alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2009; column_2: $ 32452
amount ( in thousands ): 2010; column_2: 35138
amount ( in thousands ): 2011; column_2: 50421
amount ( in thousands ): 2012; column_2: 39067
amount ( in thousands ): 2013; column_2: 26301
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: 137858
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 321237
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 73512
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 247725

Additional report context:
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what portion of the future minimum lease payments for entergy louisiana will be used for interest payments?
Answer: 22.9%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2010: $ 100.00; 2011: $ 80.03; 2012: $ 108.98; 2013: $ 148.98; 2014: $ 163.71; 2015: $ 177.40
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2010: 100.00; 2011: 76.82; 2012: 102.19; 2013: 140.77; 2014: 153.96; 2015: 154.71
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2010: 100.00; 2011: 82.94; 2012: 106.78; 2013: 144.79; 2014: 166.76; 2015: 164.15
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2010: 100.00; 2011: 102.11; 2012: 118.44; 2013: 156.78; 2014: 178.22; 2015: 180.67

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
note 4 : property , plant and equipment the following table summarizes the major classes of property , plant and equipment by category as of december 31 : 2015 2014 range of remaining useful weighted average useful life utility plant : land and other non-depreciable assets . . . . . . . . . . $ 141 $ 137 sources of supply . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 705 681 12 to 127 years 51 years treatment and pumping facilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3070 2969 3 to 101 years 39 years transmission and distribution facilities . . . . . . . . . 8516 7963 9 to 156 years 83 years services , meters and fire hydrants . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3250 3062 8 to 93 years 35 years general structures and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1227 1096 1 to 154 years 39 years waste treatment , pumping and disposal . . . . . . . . . 313 281 2 to 115 years 46 years waste collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 473 399 5 to 109 years 56 years construction work in progress . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 404 303 total utility plant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18099 16891 nonutility property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 405 378 3 to 50 years 6 years total property , plant and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18504 $ 17269 property , plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $ 405 , $ 392 , and $ 374 for the years ended december 31 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations . the provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.13% ( 3.13 % ) for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and 3.20% ( 3.20 % ) for years december 31 , 2014 and 2013 . note 5 : allowance for uncollectible accounts the following table summarizes the changes in the company 2019s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended december 31: .

Financial table:
2015: balance as of january 1; 2014: $ -35 ( 35 ); 2013: $ -34 ( 34 ); column_4: $ -27 ( 27 )
2015: amounts charged to expense; 2014: -32 ( 32 ); 2013: -37 ( 37 ); column_4: -27 ( 27 )
2015: amounts written off; 2014: 38; 2013: 43; column_4: 24
2015: recoveries of amounts written off; 2014: -10 ( 10 ); 2013: -7 ( 7 ); column_4: -4 ( 4 )
2015: balance as of december 31; 2014: $ -39 ( 39 ); 2013: $ -35 ( 35 ); column_4: $ -34 ( 34 )

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the change in accumulated depreciation from depreciation expenses from 2013 to december 31 , 2015
Answer: 1171
Financial report context:
lkq corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 5 . long-term obligations ( continued ) as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 1.7 million , $ 7.2 million and $ 6.4 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . we also assumed certain liabilities in connection with a business acquisition during the second quarter of 2005 , including a promissory note with a remaining principle balance of approximately $ 0.2 million . the annual interest rate on the note , which was retired during 2006 , was note 6 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 42335: 33249
2008: 2010; $ 42335: 25149
2008: 2011; $ 42335: 17425
2008: 2012; $ 42335: 11750
2008: thereafter; $ 42335: 28581
2008: future minimum lease payments; $ 42335: $ 158489

Additional report context:
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 27.4 million , $ 18.6 million and $ 12.2 million during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we guaranty the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guaranties at december 31 , 2007 , the guarantied residual value would have totaled approximately $ 24.0 million . litigation and related contingencies on december 2 , 2005 , ford global technologies , llc ( 2018 2018ford 2019 2019 ) filed a complaint with the united states international trade commission ( 2018 2018usitc 2019 2019 ) against keystone and five other named respondents , including four taiwan-based manufacturers . on december 12 , 2005 , ford filed an amended complaint . both the complaint and the amended complaint contended that keystone and the other respondents infringed 14 design patents that ford alleges cover eight parts on the 2004-2005 .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: 47%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

Financial table:
2007: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 41.31; low: $ 36.63
2007: quarter ended june 30; high: 43.84; low: 37.64
2007: quarter ended september 30; high: 45.45; low: 36.34
2007: quarter ended december 31; high: 46.53; low: 40.08
2007: 2006; high: high; low: low
2007: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 32.68; low: $ 26.66
2007: quarter ended june 30; high: 35.75; low: 27.35
2007: quarter ended september 30; high: 36.92; low: 29.98
2007: quarter ended december 31; high: 38.74; low: 35.21

Additional report context:
on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the price of shares from the highest value during the quarter ended december 31 , 2007 and the closing price on february 29 , 2008?
Answer: -17.4%
Financial report context:
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 293.9
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 39.0
amount ( in millions ): net gas revenue; column_2: -2.5 ( 2.5 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -5.1 ( 5.1 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -8.1 ( 8.1 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 317.2

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .

Question: the net income increases in 2015 were what percent of the net income changes in 2016?
Answer: 356%
Financial report context:
the graph below matches cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index , and the nasdaq composite index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 28 , 2002 and tracks it through december 29 , 2007 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s&p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s&p information technology index 12/29/0712/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/02 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/28/02 in stock or on 12/31/02 in index-including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Financial table:
12/28/02: cadence design systems inc .; 1/3/04: 100.00; 1/1/05: 149.92; 12/31/05: 113.38; 12/30/06: 138.92; 12/29/07: 147.04; column_7: 139.82
12/28/02: s & p 500; 1/3/04: 100.00; 1/1/05: 128.68; 12/31/05: 142.69; 12/30/06: 149.70; 12/29/07: 173.34; column_7: 182.87
12/28/02: nasdaq composite; 1/3/04: 100.00; 1/1/05: 149.75; 12/31/05: 164.64; 12/30/06: 168.60; 12/29/07: 187.83; column_7: 205.22
12/28/02: s & p information technology; 1/3/04: 100.00; 1/1/05: 147.23; 12/31/05: 150.99; 12/30/06: 152.49; 12/29/07: 165.32; column_7: 192.28

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cadence design systems , inc . 2019s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock versus the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/29/07?
Answer: -43.05%
Financial report context:
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 644.2
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -35.1 ( 35.1 )
amount ( in millions ): purchased power capacity; column_2: -5.9 ( 5.9 )
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: -5.4 ( 5.4 )
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: 5.6
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 19.0
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 4.4
amount ( in millions ): 2017 net revenue; column_2: $ 626.8

Additional report context:
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: what percent did net revenue decrease between 2016 and 2017?
Answer: .027
Financial report context:
note 9 2014goodwill and other intangibles , net goodwill the following table outlines the activity in the carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill , which is all assigned to the company 2019s trading and investing segment ( dollars in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
trading & investing: balance at december 31 2011; column_2: $ 1934232
trading & investing: activity; column_2: 2014
trading & investing: balance at december 31 2012; column_2: 1934232
trading & investing: impairment of goodwill; column_2: -142423 ( 142423 )
trading & investing: balance at december 31 2013; column_2: $ 1791809

Additional report context:
goodwill is evaluated for impairment on an annual basis and when events or changes indicate the carrying value of an asset exceeds its fair value and the loss may not be recoverable . at december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , the company 2019s trading and investing segment had two reporting units ; market making and retail brokerage . at the end of june 2013 , the company decided to exit its market making business . based on this decision in the second quarter of 2013 , the company conducted an interim goodwill impairment test for the market making reporting unit , using the expected sale structure of the market making business . this structure assumed a shorter period of cash flows related to an order flow arrangement , compared to prior estimates of fair value . based on the results of the first step of the goodwill impairment test , the company determined that the carrying value of the market making reporting unit , including goodwill , exceeded the fair value for that reporting unit as of june 30 , 2013 . the company proceeded to the second step of the goodwill impairment test to measure the amount of goodwill impairment . as a result of the evaluation , it was determined that the entire carrying amount of goodwill allocated to the market making reporting unit was impaired , and the company recognized a $ 142.4 million impairment of goodwill during the second quarter of 2013 . for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , the company performed its annual goodwill assessment for the retail brokerage reporting unit , electing to qualitatively assess whether it was more likely than not that the fair value was less than the carrying value . as a result of this assessment , the company determined that the first step of the goodwill impairment test was not necessary , and concluded that goodwill was not impaired at december 31 , 2013 . at december 31 , 2013 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 142.4 million related to the trading and investing segment and $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment . at december 31 , 2012 , goodwill is net of accumulated impairment losses of $ 101.2 million in the balance sheet management segment. .

Question: what was the percentage change in carrying value of the company 2019s goodwill between 2012 and 2013?
Answer: -7%