alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period , and the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s information technology index on may 31 , 2012 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . 5/12 5/165/155/145/13 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology 12/16 12/17 comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2012 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . global payments 500 index information technology .

Financial table:
globalpayments: may 31 2012; s&p500 index: $ 100.00; s&pinformationtechnology index: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
globalpayments: may 31 2013; s&p500 index: 113.10; s&pinformationtechnology index: 127.28; column_4: 115.12
globalpayments: may 31 2014; s&p500 index: 161.90; s&pinformationtechnology index: 153.30; column_4: 142.63
globalpayments: may 31 2015; s&p500 index: 246.72; s&pinformationtechnology index: 171.40; column_4: 169.46
globalpayments: may 31 2016; s&p500 index: 367.50; s&pinformationtechnology index: 174.34; column_4: 174.75
globalpayments: december 31 2016; s&p500 index: 328.42; s&pinformationtechnology index: 188.47; column_4: 194.08
globalpayments: december 31 2017; s&p500 index: 474.52; s&pinformationtechnology index: 229.61; column_4: 269.45

Additional report context:
30 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: what was the percentage gained by investing $ 100 into global payments in comparison to the technology index?
Answer: 205.07%
Financial report context:
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

Financial table:
2012: statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes; 2011: 35% ( 35 % ); column_3: 35% ( 35 % )
2012: effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits; 2011: 18; column_3: 6
2012: change in permanent reinvestment assertion; 2011: 2014; column_3: 5
2012: adjustments to valuation allowances; 2011: 21; column_3: 14
2012: tax law changes; 2011: 2014; column_3: 1
2012: effective income tax rate on continuing operations; 2011: 74% ( 74 % ); column_3: 61% ( 61 % )

Additional report context:
the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Question: what were total adjustments to valuation allowances in millions?
Answer: 35
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 1362.2
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 161.5
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -3.2 ( 3.2 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 1520.5

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy arkansas , inc.?
Answer: 11.6%
Financial report context:
( 5 ) we occupy approximately 350000 square feet of the one north end building . ( 6 ) this property is owned by board of trade investment company ( botic ) . kcbt maintains a 51% ( 51 % ) controlling interest in botic . we also lease other office space around the world and have also partnered with major global telecommunications carriers in connection with our telecommunications hubs whereby we place data cabinets within the carriers 2019 existing secured data centers . we believe our facilities are adequate for our current operations and that additional space can be obtained if needed . item 3 . legal proceedings see 201clegal and regulatory matters 201d in note 14 . contingencies to the consolidated financial statements beginning on page 91 for cme group 2019s legal proceedings disclosure which is incorporated herein by reference . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable . part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities class a common stock our class a common stock is currently listed on nasdaq under the ticker symbol 201ccme . 201d as of february 13 , 2013 , there were approximately 3106 holders of record of our class a common stock . in may 2012 , the company 2019s board of directors declared a five-for-one split of its class a common stock effected by way of a stock dividend to its class a and class b shareholders . the stock split was effective july 20 , 2012 for all shareholders of record on july 10 , 2012 . as a result of the stock split , all amounts related to shares and per share amounts have been retroactively restated . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our class a common stock on a quarterly basis , as reported on nasdaq. .

Financial table:
2012 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 59.73: 58.24; low $ 45.20: 50.70; 2011 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 63.40: 62.15; low $ 56.06: 52.45
2012 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 59.73: 59.35; low $ 45.20: 49.83; 2011 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 63.40: 59.80; low $ 56.06: 47.43
2012 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 59.73: 57.89; low $ 45.20: 50.12; 2011 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 63.40: 59.73; low $ 56.06: 45.20

Additional report context:
class b common stock our class b common stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or traded in an organized over- the-counter market . each class of our class b common stock is associated with a membership in a specific division of our cme exchange . cme 2019s rules provide exchange members with trading rights and the ability to use or lease these trading rights . each share of our class b common stock can be transferred only in connection with the transfer of the associated trading rights. .

Question: what is the maximum change in share price during the fourth quarter of 2012?
Answer: 7.77
Financial report context:
j a c k h e n r y . c o m 1 5 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the company 2019s common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201cjkhy 201d . the company established a practice of paying quarterly dividends at the end of fiscal 1990 and has paid dividends with respect to every quarter since that time . the declaration and payment of any future dividends will continue to be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon , among other factors , our earnings , capital requirements , contractual restrictions , and operating and financial condition . the company does not currently foresee any changes in its dividend practices . on august 15 , 2019 , there were approximately 145300 holders of the company 2019s common stock , including individual participants in security position listings . on that same date the last sale price of the common shares as reported on nasdaq was $ 141.94 per share . issuer purchases of equity securities the following shares of the company were repurchased during the quarter ended june 30 , 2019 : total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ) .

Financial table:
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): april 1- april 30 2019; average price of share: 2014; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 2014; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 2014; column_5: 3732713
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): may 1- may 31 2019; average price of share: 250000; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 134.35; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 250000; column_5: 3482713
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): june 1- june 30 2019; average price of share: 2014; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 2014; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 2014; column_5: 3482713
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): total; average price of share: 250000; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 134.35; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 250000; column_5: 3482713

Additional report context:
( 1 ) 250000 shares were purchased through a publicly announced repurchase plan . there were no shares surrendered to the company to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with employee restricted stock awards . ( 2 ) total stock repurchase authorizations approved by the company 2019s board of directors as of february 17 , 2015 were for 30.0 million shares . these authorizations have no specific dollar or share price targets and no expiration dates. .

Question: what percent of the total years repurchases were done in the period from may 1- may 31 2019?
Answer: 100%
Financial report context:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2012 through october 29 , 2017 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2012 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/28/12 in stock or 10/31/12 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
10/28/2012: applied materials; 10/27/2013: 100.00; 10/26/2014: 171.03; 10/25/2015: 207.01; 10/30/2016: 165.34; 10/29/2017: 293.64; column_7: 586.91
10/28/2012: s&p 500 index; 10/27/2013: 100.00; 10/26/2014: 127.18; 10/25/2015: 149.14; 10/30/2016: 156.89; 10/29/2017: 163.97; column_7: 202.72
10/28/2012: rdg semiconductor composite index; 10/27/2013: 100.00; 10/26/2014: 131.94; 10/25/2015: 167.25; 10/30/2016: 160.80; 10/29/2017: 193.36; column_7: 288.96

Additional report context:
dividends during each of fiscal 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made in 2012 and sold in 2015?
Answer: 56.9%
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2014 net revenue; column_2: $ 2224
amount ( in millions ): nuclear realized price changes; column_2: -310 ( 310 )
amount ( in millions ): vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014; column_2: -305 ( 305 )
amount ( in millions ): nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect; column_2: 20
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 37
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 1666

Additional report context:
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Question: what was the percent of the decline in the net revenue in 2015
Answer: -558
Financial report context:
december 18 , 2007 , we issued an additional 23182197 shares of common stock to citadel . the issuances were exempt from registration pursuant to section 4 ( 2 ) of the securities act of 1933 , and each purchaser has represented to us that it is an 201caccredited investor 201d as defined in regulation d promulgated under the securities act of 1933 , and that the common stock was being acquired for investment . we did not engage in a general solicitation or advertising with regard to the issuances of the common stock and have not offered securities to the public in connection with the issuances . see item 1 . business 2014citadel investment . performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor 2019s ( 201cs&p 201d ) 500 and the s&p super cap diversified financials during the period from december 31 , 2002 through december 31 , 2007. .

Financial table:
12/02: e*trade financial corporation; 12/03: 100.00; 12/04: 260.29; 12/05: 307.61; 12/06: 429.22; 12/07: 461.32; column_7: 73.05
12/02: s&p 500; 12/03: 100.00; 12/04: 128.68; 12/05: 142.69; 12/06: 149.70; 12/07: 173.34; column_7: 182.87
12/02: s&p super cap diversified financials; 12/03: 100.00; 12/04: 139.29; 12/05: 156.28; 12/06: 170.89; 12/07: 211.13; column_7: 176.62

Additional report context:
2022 $ 100 invested on 12/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . 2022 copyright a9 2008 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for e*trade financial corporation for the five years ended 12/07?
Answer: -26.95%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2013: $ 100.00; 2014: $ 109.88; 2015: $ 119.07; 2016: $ 160.23; 2017: $ 203.07; 2018: $ 189.57
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 109.36; 2015: 109.90; 2016: 141.23; 2017: 167.49; 2018: 137.82
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 115.18; 2015: 113.38; 2016: 139.17; 2017: 169.98; 2018: 147.82
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 113.68; 2015: 115.24; 2016: 129.02; 2017: 157.17; 2018: 150.27

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: based on the review of the stock perfomance what was the ratio of the jpmorgan chase in 2017 to 3 kbw bank index
Answer: 1.2
Financial report context:
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 . our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds . in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group . cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

Financial table:
12/2007: valero common stock; 12/2008: $ 100.00; 12/2009: $ 31.45; 12/2010: $ 25.09; 12/2011: $ 35.01; 12/2012: $ 32.26; column_7: $ 53.61
12/2007: s&p 500; 12/2008: 100.00; 12/2009: 63.00; 12/2010: 79.67; 12/2011: 91.67; 12/2012: 93.61; column_7: 108.59
12/2007: old peer group; 12/2008: 100.00; 12/2009: 80.98; 12/2010: 76.54; 12/2011: 88.41; 12/2012: 104.33; column_7: 111.11
12/2007: new peer group; 12/2008: 100.00; 12/2009: 66.27; 12/2010: 86.87; 12/2011: 72.84; 12/2012: 74.70; column_7: 76.89

Additional report context:
____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .

Question: what was the biggest decline , in percentage , from 2007-2008 , among the four groups?
Answer: 0.6855