alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
period: october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012; total number of shares purchased: 842445; average price paid per share: $ 93.38; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 842445; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): $ 2522
period: october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012; total number of shares purchased: 872973; average price paid per share: 90.86; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 872973; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): 2443
period: november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012; total number of shares purchased: 1395288; average price paid per share: 92.02; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 1395288; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): 2315
period: total; total number of shares purchased: 3110706; average price paid per share: $ 92.07; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 3110706; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): $ 2315

Additional report context:
( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . the program does not have an expiration date . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .

Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during october 2012 , in millions?
Answer: 78.7
Financial report context:
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
period: october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012; total number of shares purchased: 842445; average price paid per share: $ 93.38; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 842445; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): $ 2522
period: october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012; total number of shares purchased: 872973; average price paid per share: 90.86; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 872973; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): 2443
period: november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012; total number of shares purchased: 1395288; average price paid per share: 92.02; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 1395288; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): 2315
period: total; total number of shares purchased: 3110706; average price paid per share: $ 92.07; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 3110706; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): $ 2315

Additional report context:
( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . the program does not have an expiration date . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .

Question: what was the percent of the repurchases of common stock during the three-month ended december 312012 that was bought in october
Answer: 27.1%
Financial report context:
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
2017: 2018; $ 114857: 127504
2017: 2019; $ 114857: 136040
2017: 2020; $ 114857: 133092
2017: 2021; $ 114857: 122753
2017: 2022 and thereafter; $ 114857: 788180
2017: total future minimum lease payments; $ 114857: $ 1422426

Additional report context:
included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .

Question: what is the percentage change in interest expense from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 80.8%
Financial report context:
other expense , net : the company's other expense consists of the following: .

Financial table:
( in thousands ): foreign currency losses net; year ended december 31 , 2013: $ -1115 ( 1115 ); year ended december 31 , 2012: $ -1401 ( 1401 )
( in thousands ): other income ( expense ) net; year ended december 31 , 2013: 69; year ended december 31 , 2012: -4 ( 4 )
( in thousands ): total other expense net; year ended december 31 , 2013: $ -1046 ( 1046 ); year ended december 31 , 2012: $ -1405 ( 1405 )

Additional report context:
income tax provision : the company recorded income tax expense of $ 77.2 million and had income before income taxes of $ 322.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2013 , representing an effective tax rate of 23.9% ( 23.9 % ) . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , the company recorded income tax expense of $ 90.1 million and had income before income taxes of $ 293.5 million , representing an effective tax rate of 30.7% ( 30.7 % ) . in december 2013 , the company received notice from the irs that the joint committee on taxation took no exception to the company's tax returns that were filed for 2009 and 2010 . an $ 11.0 million tax benefit was recognized in the company's 2013 financial results as the company had effectively settled uncertainty regarding the realization of refund claims filed in connection with the 2009 and 2010 returns . in the u.s. , which is the largest jurisdiction where the company receives such a tax credit , the availability of the research and development credit expired at the end of the 2011 tax year . in january 2013 , the u.s . congress passed legislation that reinstated the research and development credit retroactive to 2012 . the income tax provision for the year ended december 31 , 2013 includes approximately $ 2.3 million related to the reinstated research and development credit for 2012 activity . the decrease in the effective tax rate from the prior year is primarily due to the release of an uncertain tax position mentioned above , the reinstatement of the u.s . research and development credit mentioned above , and cash repatriation activities . when compared to the federal and state combined statutory rate , the effective tax rates for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 were favorably impacted by lower statutory tax rates in many of the company 2019s foreign jurisdictions , the domestic manufacturing deduction and tax benefits associated with the merger of the company 2019s japan subsidiaries in 2010 . net income : the company 2019s net income for the year ended december 31 , 2013 was $ 245.3 million as compared to net income of $ 203.5 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . diluted earnings per share was $ 2.58 for the year ended december 31 , 2013 and $ 2.14 for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the weighted average shares used in computing diluted earnings per share were 95.1 million and 95.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . table of contents .

Question: what was the percentage change in the company 2019s net income from 2012 to 2013 .
Answer: 20.5%
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; booking holdings inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; booking holdings inc .: 98.09; nasdaqcomposite index: 114.62; s&p 500index: 113.69; rdg internetcomposite: 96.39
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; booking holdings inc .: 109.68; nasdaqcomposite index: 122.81; s&p 500index: 115.26; rdg internetcomposite: 133.20
measurement pointdecember 31: 2016; booking holdings inc .: 126.12; nasdaqcomposite index: 133.19; s&p 500index: 129.05; rdg internetcomposite: 140.23
measurement pointdecember 31: 2017; booking holdings inc .: 149.50; nasdaqcomposite index: 172.11; s&p 500index: 157.22; rdg internetcomposite: 202.15
measurement pointdecember 31: 2018; booking holdings inc .: 148.18; nasdaqcomposite index: 165.84; s&p 500index: 150.33; rdg internetcomposite: 201.16

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage change in booking holding inc . and nasdaq composite index for the five years ended 2018?
Answer: 17.66%
Financial report context:
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 980: 1185
2008: 2010; $ 980: 978
2008: 2011; $ 980: 1022
2008: 2012; $ 980: 1425
2008: 2013 - 2017; $ 980: $ 8147

Additional report context:
( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: 20.9%
Financial report context:
projected payments relating to these liabilities for the next five years ending december 31 , 2012 and the period from 2013 to 2017 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 980: 1185
2008: 2010; $ 980: 978
2008: 2011; $ 980: 1022
2008: 2012; $ 980: 1425
2008: 2013 - 2017; $ 980: $ 8147

Additional report context:
( 18 ) concentration of risk the company generates a significant amount of revenue from large customers , however , no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenue or total segment revenue in the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 . financial instruments that potentially subject the company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash equivalents and trade receivables . the company places its cash equivalents with high credit quality financial institutions and , by policy , limits the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution . concentrations of credit risk with respect to trade receivables are limited because a large number of geographically diverse customers make up the company 2019s customer base , thus spreading the trade receivables credit risk . the company controls credit risk through monitoring procedures . ( 19 ) segment information upon completion of the certegy merger , the company implemented a new organizational structure , which resulted in a new operating segment structure beginning with the reporting of first quarter 2006 results . effective as of february 1 , 2006 , the company 2019s operating segments are tps and lps . this structure reflects how the businesses are operated and managed . the primary components of the tps segment , which includes certegy 2019s card and check services , the financial institution processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis and the operations acquired from efunds , are enterprise solutions , integrated financial solutions and international businesses . the primary components of the lps segment are mortgage information services businesses , which includes the mortgage lender processing component of the former financial institution software and services segment of fis , and the former lender services , default management , and information services segments of fis . fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the growth rate in projected payments from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: -17.5%
Financial report context:
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 272.9
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: -16.9 ( 16.9 )
amount ( in millions ): net gas revenue; column_2: -9.1 ( 9.1 )
amount ( in millions ): gas cost recovery asset; column_2: -3.0 ( 3.0 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 5.4
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -2.3 ( 2.3 )
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 247.0

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Question: from the change in net revenue in 2011 , what percentage is attributed to change in retail electric price?
Answer: 65.3%
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): balance january 1; year ended december 31 , 2010: $ 25544; year ended december 31 , 2009: $ 32619; 2008: $ 2014
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): washington mutual acquisition; year ended december 31 , 2010: 2014; year ended december 31 , 2009: 2014; 2008: 39454
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): accretion into interest income; year ended december 31 , 2010: -3232 ( 3232 ); year ended december 31 , 2009: -4363 ( 4363 ); 2008: -1292 ( 1292 )
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): changes in interest rates on variable rate loans; year ended december 31 , 2010: -819 ( 819 ); year ended december 31 , 2009: -4849 ( 4849 ); 2008: -5543 ( 5543 )
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): other changes in expected cash flows ( a ); year ended december 31 , 2010: -2396 ( 2396 ); year ended december 31 , 2009: 2137; 2008: 2014
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): balance december 31; year ended december 31 , 2010: $ 19097; year ended december 31 , 2009: $ 25544; 2008: $ 32619
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): accretable yield percentage; year ended december 31 , 2010: 4.35% ( 4.35 % ); year ended december 31 , 2009: 5.14% ( 5.14 % ); 2008: 5.81% ( 5.81 % )

Additional report context:
( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .

Question: what was the highest three year accretable yield percentage?
Answer: 5.81