alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 4935: 3144
2008: 2010; $ 4935: 3160
2008: 2011; $ 4935: 3200
2008: 2012; $ 4935: 2768
2008: thereafter; $ 4935: 9934

Additional report context:
9 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s . district court for the district of delaware . pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris . pdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees . alexion has denied pdl's claims . in addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s . patents held by pdl . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . on february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc . filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california . sb2 , inc . claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc . patents due to sales of soliris . sb2 , inc . seeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages . however , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) . product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 . we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 . such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .

Question: what is the average future minimum annual rental payment for the next five years?
Answer: 4441
Financial report context:
market price and dividends d u k e r e a l t y c o r p o r a t i o n 3 8 2 0 0 2 a n n u a l r e p o r t the company 2019s common shares are listed for trading on the new york stock exchange , symbol dre . the following table sets forth the high and low sales prices of the common stock for the periods indicated and the dividend paid per share during each such period . comparable cash dividends are expected in the future . on january 29 , 2003 , the company declared a quarterly cash dividend of $ .455 per share , payable on february 28 , 2003 , to common shareholders of record on february 14 , 2003. .

Financial table:
quarter ended: december 31; 2002 high: $ 25.84; 2002 low: $ 21.50; 2002 dividend: $ .455; 2002 high: $ 24.80; 2002 low: $ 22.00; dividend: $ .45
quarter ended: september 30; 2002 high: 28.88; 2002 low: 21.40; 2002 dividend: .455; 2002 high: 26.17; 2002 low: 21.60; dividend: .45
quarter ended: june 30; 2002 high: 28.95; 2002 low: 25.46; 2002 dividend: .450; 2002 high: 24.99; 2002 low: 22.00; dividend: .43
quarter ended: march 31; 2002 high: 26.50; 2002 low: 22.92; 2002 dividend: .450; 2002 high: 25.44; 2002 low: 21.85; dividend: .43

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the percent change in quarterly cash dividend for the period ended march 31 2002 to the period ended march 31 2003?
Answer: 1.11%
Financial report context:
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue; column_2: $ 231.0
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 15.5
amount ( in millions ): net gas revenue; column_2: 6.6
amount ( in millions ): rider revenue; column_2: 3.9
amount ( in millions ): base revenue; column_2: -11.3 ( 11.3 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 7.0
amount ( in millions ): 2008 net revenue; column_2: $ 252.7

Additional report context:
the volume/weather variance is due to an increase in electricity usage in the service territory in 2008 compared to the same period in 2007 . entergy new orleans estimates that approximately 141000 electric customers and 93000 gas customers have returned since hurricane katrina and are taking service as of december 31 , 2008 , compared to approximately 132000 electric customers and 86000 gas customers as of december 31 , 2007 . billed retail electricity usage increased a total of 184 gwh compared to the same period in 2007 , an increase of 4% ( 4 % ) . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates in march and november 2007 . refer to note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the base rate increase . the rider revenue variance is due primarily to higher total revenue and a storm reserve rider effective march 2007 as a result of the city council's approval of a settlement agreement in october 2006 . the approved storm reserve has been set to collect $ 75 million over a ten-year period through the rider and the funds will be held in a restricted escrow account . the settlement agreement is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a base rate recovery credit , effective january 2008 . the base rate credit is discussed in note 2 to the financial statements . gross operating revenues and fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : an increase of $ 58.9 million in gross wholesale revenue due to increased sales to affiliated customers and an increase in the average price of energy available for resale sales ; an increase of $ 47.7 million in electric fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates and increased electricity usage ; and an increase of $ 22 million in gross gas revenues due to higher fuel recovery revenues and increases in gas base rates in march 2007 and november 2007 . fuel and purchased power increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power in addition to an increase in demand. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008 compare to 2007?
Answer: 9.4%
Financial report context:
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Financial table:
december 29 2001: cadence design systems inc .; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 54.38; january 1 2005: 81.52; december 31 2005: 61.65; december 30 2006: 75.54; column_7: 79.96
december 29 2001: s & p 500; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 77.90; january 1 2005: 100.24; december 31 2005: 111.15; december 30 2006: 116.61; column_7: 135.03
december 29 2001: nasdaq composite; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 71.97; january 1 2005: 107.18; december 31 2005: 117.07; december 30 2006: 120.50; column_7: 137.02
december 29 2001: s & p information technology; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 62.59; january 1 2005: 92.14; december 31 2005: 94.50; december 30 2006: 95.44; column_7: 103.47

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in s&p500 inc from 2001 to 2005?
Answer: 11.2%
Financial report context:
simplify the presentation of deferred income taxes and reduce complexity without decreasing the usefulness of information provided to users of financial statements . the adoption of this pronouncement did not have a significant impact on the company 2019s financial position , results of operations and cash flows . 3 . acquisitions endomondo on january 5 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of endomondo , a denmark- based digital connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the purchase price was $ 85.0 million , adjusted for working capital . the company recognized $ 0.6 million and $ 0.8 million in acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , respectively . these costs are included in the consolidated statements of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d pro forma results are not presented , as the acquisition was not considered material to the consolidated company . myfitnesspal on march 17 , 2015 , the company acquired 100% ( 100 % ) of the outstanding equity of mfp , a digital nutrition and connected fitness company , to expand the under armour connected fitness community . the final adjusted transaction value totaled $ 474.0 million . the total consideration of $ 463.9 million was adjusted to reflect the accelerated vesting of certain share awards of mfp , which are not conditioned upon continued employment , and transaction costs borne by the selling shareholders . the acquisition was funded with $ 400.0 million of increased term loan borrowings and a draw on the revolving credit facility , with the remaining amount funded by cash on the company recognized $ 5.7 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed during the three months ended march 31 , 2015 . these costs are included in the consolidated statement of income in the line item entitled 201cselling , general and administrative expenses . 201d the following represents the pro forma consolidated income statement as if mfp had been included in the consolidated results of the company for the year ended december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014: .

Financial table:
( in thousands ): net revenues; year ended december 31 , 2015: $ 3967008; year ended december 31 , 2014: $ 3098341
( in thousands ): net income; year ended december 31 , 2015: 231277; year ended december 31 , 2014: 189659

Additional report context:
these amounts have been calculated after applying the company 2019s accounting policies and adjusting the results of mfp to reflect the acquisition as if it closed on january 1 , 2014 . pro forma net income for the year ended december 31 , 2014 includes $ 5.7 million in transaction expenses which were included in the consolidated statement of income for the year ended december 31 , 2015 , but excluded from the calculation of pro forma net income for december 31 , 2015. .

Question: what was the profit margin in 2015
Answer: 5.8%
Financial report context:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Financial table:
date: 31-dec-2012; citi: 100.0; s&p 500: 100.0; s&p financials: 100.0
date: 31-dec-2013; citi: 131.8; s&p 500: 132.4; s&p financials: 135.6
date: 31-dec-2014; citi: 137.0; s&p 500: 150.5; s&p financials: 156.2
date: 31-dec-2015; citi: 131.4; s&p 500: 152.6; s&p financials: 153.9
date: 31-dec-2016; citi: 152.3; s&p 500: 170.8; s&p financials: 188.9
date: 31-dec-2017; citi: 193.5; s&p 500: 208.1; s&p financials: 230.9

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage growth of the five-year cumulative total return of s&p financials from 2015 to 2016
Answer: 22.7%
Financial report context:
before the purchase in november 2008 , the units will be reflected in diluted earnings per share calculations using the treasury stock method as defined by sfas no . 128 , earnings per share . under this method , the number of shares of common stock used in calculating diluted earnings per share ( based on the settlement formula applied at the end of the reporting period ) is deemed to be increased by the excess , if any , of the number of shares that would be issued upon settlement of the purchase contracts less the number of shares that could be purchased by the company in the market at the average market price during the period using the proceeds to be received upon settlement . therefore , dilution will occur for periods when the average market price of the company 2019s common stock for the reporting period is above $ 21.816 . senior secured revolving credit facility in september 2005 , the company entered into a $ 250 million , three-year senior secured revolving credit facility . as a result of the citadel investment in november 2007 , the facility was terminated and all unamortized debt issuance costs were expensed . corporate debt covenants certain of the company 2019s corporate debt described above have terms which include customary financial covenants . as of december 31 , 2007 , the company was in compliance with all such covenants . early extinguishment of debt in 2006 , the company called the entire remaining $ 185.2 million principal amount of its 6% ( 6 % ) notes for redemption . the company recorded a $ 0.7 million loss on early extinguishment of debt relating to the write-off of the unamortized debt offering costs . the company did not have any early extinguishments of debt in 2005 . other corporate debt the company also has multiple term loans from financial institutions . these loans are collateralized by equipment and are included within other borrowings on the consolidated balance sheet . see note 14 2014securities sold under agreement to repurchase and other borrowings . future maturities of corporate debt scheduled principal payments of corporate debt as of december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( dollars in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 2014: 2014
2008: 2010; $ 2014: 2014
2008: 2011; $ 2014: 453815
2008: 2012; $ 2014: 2014
2008: thereafter; $ 2014: 2996337
2008: total future principal payments of corporate debt; $ 2014: 3450152
2008: unamortized discount net; $ 2014: -427454 ( 427454 )
2008: total corporate debt; $ 2014: $ 3022698

Additional report context:
.

Question: as of december 2007 what was the ratio of the future debt maturities for 2011 to the amounts after 2012
Answer: 0.15
Financial report context:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 65691 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2018 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2017 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Financial table:
date: 31-dec-2012; citi: 100.0; s&p 500: 100.0; s&p financials: 100.0
date: 31-dec-2013; citi: 131.8; s&p 500: 132.4; s&p financials: 135.6
date: 31-dec-2014; citi: 137.0; s&p 500: 150.5; s&p financials: 156.2
date: 31-dec-2015; citi: 131.4; s&p 500: 152.6; s&p financials: 153.9
date: 31-dec-2016; citi: 152.3; s&p 500: 170.8; s&p financials: 188.9
date: 31-dec-2017; citi: 193.5; s&p 500: 208.1; s&p financials: 230.9

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ended 31-dec-2017 of citi common stock and s&p financials?
Answer: -37.4
Financial report context:
part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Financial table:
12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .; 1/3/2015: $ 100.00; 1/2/2016: $ 135.18; 12/31/2016: $ 149.39; 12/30/2017: $ 181.05; 12/29/2018: $ 300.22; column_7: $ 311.13
12/28/2013: nasdaq composite; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 112.60; 12/31/2016: 113.64; 12/30/2017: 133.19; 12/29/2018: 172.11; column_7: 165.84
12/28/2013: s&p 500; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 110.28; 12/31/2016: 109.54; 12/30/2017: 129.05; 12/29/2018: 157.22; column_7: 150.33
12/28/2013: s&p 500 information technology; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 115.49; 12/31/2016: 121.08; 12/30/2017: 144.85; 12/29/2018: 201.10; column_7: 200.52

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . compared to the nasdaq composite for the period ending 12/29/2018?
Answer: 145.29%
Financial report context:
coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds . the yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of u.s.-issued aa-graded corporate bonds , all of which were non callable ( or callable with make-whole provisions ) . historically , for each plan , the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments . the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return , prior to administrative and investment management fees , for current and planned asset classes in the plans 2019 investment portfolios . assumed projected rates of return for each of the plans 2019 projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes . based on the target asset allocation for each asset class , the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed , adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets . the company 2019s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases . assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans . the health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions . a one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects : percentage- increase percentage- decrease .

Financial table:
one-percentage-pointincrease: effect on total of service and interest cost components; one-percentage-pointdecrease: $ 7367; column_3: $ -5974 ( 5974 )
one-percentage-pointincrease: effect on other postretirement benefit obligation; one-percentage-pointdecrease: $ 72238; column_3: $ -60261 ( 60261 )

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the net effect of the one-percentage point increase and decrease on total service and interest cost components
Answer: 1393