alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

Financial table:
12/09: e*trade financial corporation; 12/10: 100.00; 12/11: 90.91; 12/12: 45.23; 12/13: 50.85; 12/14: 111.59; column_7: 137.81
12/09: s&p 500 index; 12/10: 100.00; 12/11: 115.06; 12/12: 117.49; 12/13: 136.30; 12/14: 180.44; column_7: 205.14
12/09: dow jones us financials index; 12/10: 100.00; 12/11: 112.72; 12/12: 98.24; 12/13: 124.62; 12/14: 167.26; column_7: 191.67

Additional report context:
table of contents .

Question: what was the total return percentage for e*trade financial corporation for the five years ended 12/14?
Answer: 37.81%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2010 and 2009. .

Financial table:
2010: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 44.61; low: $ 40.10
2010: quarter ended june 30; high: 45.33; low: 38.86
2010: quarter ended september 30; high: 52.11; low: 43.70
2010: quarter ended december 31; high: 53.14; low: 49.61
2010: 2009; high: high; low: low
2010: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 32.53; low: $ 25.45
2010: quarter ended june 30; high: 34.52; low: 27.93
2010: quarter ended september 30; high: 37.71; low: 29.89
2010: quarter ended december 31; high: 43.84; low: 35.03

Additional report context:
on february 11 , 2011 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 56.73 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 11 , 2011 , we had 397612895 outstanding shares of common stock and 463 registered holders . dividends we have not historically paid a dividend on our common stock . payment of dividends in the future , when , as and if authorized by our board of directors , would depend upon many factors , including our earnings and financial condition , restrictions under applicable law and our current and future loan agreements , our debt service requirements , our capital expenditure requirements and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant from time to time , including the potential determination to elect reit status . in addition , the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan contain covenants that generally restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: on february 112011 what was the market capitalization
Answer: 22556579533.3
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Financial table:
2002: net mw in operation at december 31; 2001: 3955; 2000: 3445; column_4: 2475
2002: generation in gwh for the year; 2001: 29953; 2000: 22614; column_4: 7171
2002: capacity factor for the year; 2001: 93% ( 93 % ); 2000: 93% ( 93 % ); column_4: 94% ( 94 % )

Additional report context:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: what was the percent of the increase in non-utility nuclear earnings in 2002
Answer: 57%
Financial report context:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
12/29/2007: cadence design systems inc .; 1/3/2009: 100.00; 1/2/2010: 22.55; 1/1/2011: 35.17; 12/31/2011: 48.50; 12/29/2012: 61.07; column_7: 78.92
12/29/2007: nasdaq composite; 1/3/2009: 100.00; 1/2/2010: 59.03; 1/1/2011: 82.25; 12/31/2011: 97.32; 12/29/2012: 98.63; column_7: 110.78
12/29/2007: s&p 400 information technology; 1/3/2009: 100.00; 1/2/2010: 54.60; 1/1/2011: 82.76; 12/31/2011: 108.11; 12/29/2012: 95.48; column_7: 109.88

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what is the roi of nasdaq composite from 2008 to 2009?
Answer: -41.0%
Financial report context:
the fair value of the psu award at the date of grant is amortized to expense over the performance period , which is typically three years after the date of the award , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . as of december 31 , 2017 , pmi had $ 34 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested psu awards . this cost is recognized over a weighted-average performance cycle period of two years , or upon death , disability or reaching the age of 58 . during the years ended december 31 , 2017 , and 2016 , there were no psu awards that vested . pmi did not grant any psu awards during note 10 . earnings per share : unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and therefore are included in pmi 2019s earnings per share calculation pursuant to the two-class method . basic and diluted earnings per share ( 201ceps 201d ) were calculated using the following: .

Financial table:
( in millions ): net earnings attributable to pmi; for the years ended december 31 , 2017: $ 6035; for the years ended december 31 , 2016: $ 6967; for the years ended december 31 , 2015: $ 6873
( in millions ): less distributed and undistributed earnings attributable to share-based payment awards; for the years ended december 31 , 2017: 14; for the years ended december 31 , 2016: 19; for the years ended december 31 , 2015: 24
( in millions ): net earnings for basic and diluted eps; for the years ended december 31 , 2017: $ 6021; for the years ended december 31 , 2016: $ 6948; for the years ended december 31 , 2015: $ 6849
( in millions ): weighted-average shares for basic eps; for the years ended december 31 , 2017: 1552; for the years ended december 31 , 2016: 1551; for the years ended december 31 , 2015: 1549
( in millions ): plus contingently issuable performance stock units ( psus ); for the years ended december 31 , 2017: 1; for the years ended december 31 , 2016: 2014; for the years ended december 31 , 2015: 2014
( in millions ): weighted-average shares for diluted eps; for the years ended december 31 , 2017: 1553; for the years ended december 31 , 2016: 1551; for the years ended december 31 , 2015: 1549

Additional report context:
for the 2017 , 2016 and 2015 computations , there were no antidilutive stock options. .

Question: what is the growth rate of the net earnings attributable to pmi?
Answer: -13.4%
Financial report context:
part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Financial table:
12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .; 1/3/2015: $ 100.00; 1/2/2016: $ 135.18; 12/31/2016: $ 149.39; 12/30/2017: $ 181.05; 12/29/2018: $ 300.22; column_7: $ 311.13
12/28/2013: nasdaq composite; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 112.60; 12/31/2016: 113.64; 12/30/2017: 133.19; 12/29/2018: 172.11; column_7: 165.84
12/28/2013: s&p 500; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 110.28; 12/31/2016: 109.54; 12/30/2017: 129.05; 12/29/2018: 157.22; column_7: 150.33
12/28/2013: s&p 500 information technology; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 115.49; 12/31/2016: 121.08; 12/30/2017: 144.85; 12/29/2018: 201.10; column_7: 200.52

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in nasdaq from 2017 to 2018?
Answer: -3.6%
Financial report context:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Financial table:
2010: loews common stock; 2011: 100.0; 2012: 97.37; 2013: 106.04; 2014: 126.23; 2015: 110.59; column_7: 101.72
2010: s&p 500 index; 2011: 100.0; 2012: 102.11; 2013: 118.45; 2014: 156.82; 2015: 178.29; column_7: 180.75
2010: loews peer group ( a ); 2011: 100.0; 2012: 101.59; 2013: 115.19; 2014: 145.12; 2015: 152.84; column_7: 144.70

Additional report context:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Question: what is the percentage reduction in the loews common stock from 2013 to 2014
Answer: -12.4%
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 98.0 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates ; and 2022 an increase due to volume/weather , as discussed above . the increase was partially offset by the following : 2022 a decrease of $ 31.9 million in the price applied to unbilled sales , as discussed above ; 2022 a decrease of $ 12.2 million in rate refund provisions , as discussed above ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 5.2 million in gross wholesale revenue due to decreased sales to affiliated systems . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs ; and 2022 an increase in the market price of natural gas . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to : 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 14.3 million of capacity charges related to generation resource planning as allowed by the lpsc ; 2022 the amortization in 2003 of $ 11.8 million of deferred capacity charges , as discussed above ; and 2022 the deferral in 2004 of $ 11.4 million related to entergy's voluntary severance program , in accordance with a proposed stipulation with the lpsc staff . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2002 net revenue; column_2: $ 922.9
( in millions ): deferred fuel cost revisions; column_2: 59.1
( in millions ): asset retirement obligation; column_2: 8.2
( in millions ): volume; column_2: -16.2 ( 16.2 )
( in millions ): vidalia settlement; column_2: -9.2 ( 9.2 )
( in millions ): other; column_2: 8.9
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 973.7

Additional report context:
the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in december 2002 and a further revision made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . the asset retirement obligation variance was due to the implementation of sfas 143 , "accounting for asset retirement obligations" adopted in january 2003 . see "critical accounting estimates" for more details on sfas 143 . the increase was offset by decommissioning expense and had no effect on net income . the volume variance was due to a decrease in electricity usage in the service territory . billed usage decreased 1868 gwh in the industrial sector including the loss of a large industrial customer to cogeneration. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2003 for entergy louisiana , inc.?
Answer: 5.5%
Financial report context:
the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in the company 2019s common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2001 and tracks it through december 30 , 2006 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the s & p 500 index , the nasdaq composite index and the s & p information technology index 12/30/0612/31/051/1/051/3/0412/28/0212/29/01 cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s & p information technology s & p 500 * $ 100 invested on 12/29/01 in stock or on 12/31/01 in index-incuding reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright b7 2007 , standard & poor 2019s , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc . all rights reserved . www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 1 , december 31 , december 30 .

Financial table:
december 29 2001: cadence design systems inc .; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 54.38; january 1 2005: 81.52; december 31 2005: 61.65; december 30 2006: 75.54; column_7: 79.96
december 29 2001: s & p 500; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 77.90; january 1 2005: 100.24; december 31 2005: 111.15; december 30 2006: 116.61; column_7: 135.03
december 29 2001: nasdaq composite; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 71.97; january 1 2005: 107.18; december 31 2005: 117.07; december 30 2006: 120.50; column_7: 137.02
december 29 2001: s & p information technology; december 28 2002: 100.00; january 3 2004: 62.59; january 1 2005: 92.14; december 31 2005: 94.50; december 30 2006: 95.44; column_7: 103.47

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total return to shareholders of cadence design systems , inc . 2019s common stock for the period ended december 30 , 2006?
Answer: -20.04%
Financial report context:
alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) for the years ended december 31 , 2007 and 2006 , five month period ended december 31 , 2005 , and year ended july 31 , 2005 ( amounts in thousands , except share and per share amounts ) aggregate future minimum annual rental payments for the next five years and thereafter under non-cancellable operating leases ( including facilities and equipment ) as of december 31 , 2007 are: .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 4935: 3144
2008: 2010; $ 4935: 3160
2008: 2011; $ 4935: 3200
2008: 2012; $ 4935: 2768
2008: thereafter; $ 4935: 9934

Additional report context:
9 . commitments and contingencies legal proceedings on march 16 , 2007 , pdl biopharma , inc. , or pdl , filed a civil action against alexion in the u.s . district court for the district of delaware . pdl claims willful infringement by alexion of pdl patents due to sales of soliris . pdl seeks unspecified damages , but no less than a reasonable royalty , plus attorney 2019s fees . alexion has denied pdl's claims . in addition , we filed counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of certain u.s . patents held by pdl . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to pdl's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . on february 4 , 2008 , sb2 , inc . filed a civil action against alexion in the united states district court for the northern district of california . sb2 , inc . claims willfull infringement by alexion of sb2 , inc . patents due to sales of soliris . sb2 , inc . seeks unspecified monetary damages , equitable relief and attorneys fees . alexion believes it has good and valid defenses to sb2's claims and intends to vigorously defend the case and pursue its counterclaims . the results of such civil actions cannot be predicted with certainty due to their early stages . however , depending on the outcome of these legal matters , the operating results of the company could be materially impacted through adjustments to cost of sales ( see notes 2 , 6 and 15 for additional information related to royalties ) . product supply the large-scale product supply agreement dated december 18 , 2002 , or the lonza agreement , between lonza sales ag , or lonza , and us , relating to the manufacture of soliris , was amended in june 2007 . we amended our supply agreement to provide for additional purchase commitments of soliris of $ 30000 to $ 35000 through 2013 . such commitments may only be cancelled in limited circumstances. .

Question: what is the percent change in minimum annual rental payment between 2010 and 2011?
Answer: 1.3%