alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the table below sets forth the pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) expected to be recognized as an increase ( decrease ) to income from continuing operations before income taxes over the next twelve months as of december 31 , 2011 for the following types of derivative instruments : accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): interest rate derivatives; column_2: $ -101 ( 101 )
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): cross currency derivatives; column_2: $ -1 ( 1 )
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): foreign currency derivatives; column_2: $ 7
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): commodity and other derivatives; column_2: $ -1 ( 1 )

Additional report context:
( 1 ) excludes a loss of $ 94 million expected to be recognized as part of the sale of cartagena , which closed on february 9 , 2012 , and is further discussed in note 23 2014acquisitions and dispositions . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for interest rate hedges and cross currency swaps ( except for the amount reclassified to foreign currency transaction gains and losses to offset the remeasurement of the foreign currency-denominated debt being hedged by the cross currency swaps ) , as depreciation is recognized for interest rate hedges during construction , as foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure , and as electricity sales and fuel purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electricity and fuel transactions . these balances are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as operating and/or investing activities based on the nature of the underlying transaction . for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , pre-tax gains ( losses ) of $ 0 million , $ ( 1 ) million , and $ 0 million net of noncontrolling interests , respectively , were reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of a cash flow hedge because it was probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur by the end of the originally specified time period ( as documented at the inception of the hedging relationship ) or within an additional two-month time period thereafter. .

Question: what is total aoci ( in millions ) for 2011?
Answer: -96
Financial report context:
2 0 0 8 a n n u a l r e p o r t stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the performance of our series a common , series b common stock , and series c common stock for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 as compared with the performance of the standard and poor 2019s 500 index and a peer group index which consists of the walt disney company , time warner inc. , cbs corporation class b common stock , viacom , inc . class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , and scripps network interactive , inc . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2006 and that all subsequent dividends were reinvested in additional shares . september 18 , september 30 , december 31 , 2008 2008 2008 .

Financial table:
september 18 2008: disca; september 30 2008: $ 100.00; december 31 2008: $ 103.19; column_4: $ 102.53
september 18 2008: discb; september 30 2008: $ 100.00; december 31 2008: $ 105.54; column_4: $ 78.53
september 18 2008: disck; september 30 2008: $ 100.00; december 31 2008: $ 88.50; column_4: $ 83.69
september 18 2008: s&p 500; september 30 2008: $ 100.00; december 31 2008: $ 96.54; column_4: $ 74.86
september 18 2008: peer group; september 30 2008: $ 100.00; december 31 2008: $ 92.67; column_4: $ 68.79

Additional report context:
s&p 500 peer group .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2008?
Answer: 2.53%
Financial report context:
does not believe are in our and our stockholders 2019 best interest . the rights plan is intended to protect stockholders in the event of an unfair or coercive offer to acquire the company and to provide our board of directors with adequate time to evaluate unsolicited offers . the rights plan may prevent or make takeovers or unsolicited corporate transactions with respect to our company more difficult , even if stockholders may consider such transactions favorable , possibly including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares . item 1b . unresolved staff comments item 2 . properties as of december 31 , 2016 , our significant properties used in connection with switching centers , data centers , call centers and warehouses were as follows: .

Financial table:
approximate number: switching centers; approximate size in square feet: 57; column_3: 1400000
approximate number: data centers; approximate size in square feet: 8; column_3: 600000
approximate number: call center; approximate size in square feet: 16; column_3: 1300000
approximate number: warehouses; approximate size in square feet: 16; column_3: 500000

Additional report context:
as of december 31 , 2016 , we leased approximately 60000 cell sites . as of december 31 , 2016 , we leased approximately 2000 t-mobile and metropcs retail locations , including stores and kiosks ranging in size from approximately 100 square feet to 17000 square feet . we currently lease office space totaling approximately 950000 square feet for our corporate headquarters in bellevue , washington . we use these offices for engineering and administrative purposes . we also lease space throughout the u.s. , totaling approximately 1200000 square feet as of december 31 , 2016 , for use by our regional offices primarily for administrative , engineering and sales purposes . item 3 . legal proceedings see note 12 2013 commitments and contingencies of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k for information regarding certain legal proceedings in which we are involved . item 4 . mine safety disclosures part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market of the nasdaq stock market llc ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201ctmus . 201d as of december 31 , 2016 , there were 309 registered stockholders of record of our common stock , but we estimate the total number of stockholders to be much higher as a number of our shares are held by brokers or dealers for their customers in street name. .

Question: as of 2016 , what was the average size of data centers?
Answer: 75000
Financial report context:
2018 annual report 23 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2013 , of a $ 100 investment , assuming that dividends were reinvested quarterly . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 industrials index ( 201cs&p 500 industrials 201d ) and standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . fiscal year ended ( 1 ) snap-on incorporated s&p 500 industrials s&p 500 .

Financial table:
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2013; snap-onincorporated: $ 100.00; s&p 500industrials: $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2014; snap-onincorporated: 126.77; s&p 500industrials: 109.83; s&p 500: 113.69
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2015; snap-onincorporated: 161.15; s&p 500industrials: 107.04; s&p 500: 115.26
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2016; snap-onincorporated: 163.63; s&p 500industrials: 127.23; s&p 500: 129.05
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2017; snap-onincorporated: 169.61; s&p 500industrials: 153.99; s&p 500: 157.22
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2018; snap-onincorporated: 144.41; s&p 500industrials: 133.53; s&p 500: 150.33

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the company 2019s fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31. .

Question: what is the average annual growth rate for snap from 2016 to 2018?
Answer: -5.6%
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

Financial table:
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/2013: $ 100.00; 12/31/2014: $ 146.54; 12/31/2015: $ 159.23; 12/31/2016: $ 148.89; 12/31/2017: $ 182.70; column_7: $ 195.75
12/31/2012: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/2013: $ 100.00; 12/31/2014: $ 132.38; 12/31/2015: $ 150.49; 12/31/2016: $ 152.55; 12/31/2017: $ 170.79; column_7: $ 208.06
12/31/2012: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/2013: $ 100.00; 12/31/2014: $ 141.38; 12/31/2015: $ 176.83; 12/31/2016: $ 147.19; 12/31/2017: $ 179.37; column_7: $ 213.49

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the difference in percentage cumulative total shareowners return for united parcel service inc . versus the dow jones transportation average for the five years ended 12/31/2017?
Answer: -17.74%
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Financial table:
12/31/02: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/03: $ 100.00; 12/31/04: $ 119.89; 12/31/05: $ 139.55; 12/31/06: $ 124.88; 12/31/07: $ 127.08; column_7: $ 122.64
12/31/02: s&p 500 index; 12/31/03: $ 100.00; 12/31/04: $ 128.68; 12/31/05: $ 142.68; 12/31/06: $ 149.69; 12/31/07: $ 173.33; column_7: $ 182.85
12/31/02: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/03: $ 100.00; 12/31/04: $ 131.84; 12/31/05: $ 168.39; 12/31/06: $ 188.00; 12/31/07: $ 206.46; column_7: $ 209.40

Additional report context:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage five year cumulative total return for united parcel service inc . versus the s&p 500 index for the period ended 12/31/07?
Answer: -60.21%
Financial report context:
a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits , for the periods indicated , is as follows: .

Financial table:
( dollars in thousands ): balance at january 1; 2010: $ 29010; 2009: $ 34366; 2008: $ 29132
( dollars in thousands ): additions based on tax positions related to the current year; 2010: 7119; 2009: 6997; 2008: 5234
( dollars in thousands ): additions for tax positions of prior years; 2010: -; 2009: -; 2008: -
( dollars in thousands ): reductions for tax positions of prior years; 2010: -; 2009: -; 2008: -
( dollars in thousands ): settlements with taxing authorities; 2010: -12356 ( 12356 ); 2009: -12353 ( 12353 ); 2008: -
( dollars in thousands ): lapses of applicable statutes of limitations; 2010: -; 2009: -; 2008: -
( dollars in thousands ): balance at december 31; 2010: $ 23773; 2009: $ 29010; 2008: $ 34366

Additional report context:
the entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would affect the effective tax rate if recognized . in 2010 , the company favorably settled a 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company recorded a net overall tax benefit including accrued interest of $ 25920 thousand . in addition , the company was also able to take down a $ 12356 thousand fin 48 reserve that had been established regarding the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is no longer subject to u.s . federal , state and local or foreign income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007 . the company recognizes accrued interest related to net unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes . during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , the company accrued and recognized a net expense ( benefit ) of approximately $ ( 9938 ) thousand , $ 1563 thousand and $ 2446 thousand , respectively , in interest and penalties . included within the 2010 net expense ( benefit ) of $ ( 9938 ) thousand is $ ( 10591 ) thousand of accrued interest related to the 2003 and 2004 irs audit . the company is not aware of any positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease within twelve months of the reporting date . for u.s . income tax purposes the company has foreign tax credit carryforwards of $ 55026 thousand that begin to expire in 2014 . in addition , for u.s . income tax purposes the company has $ 41693 thousand of alternative minimum tax credits that do not expire . management believes that it is more likely than not that the company will realize the benefits of its net deferred tax assets and , accordingly , no valuation allowance has been recorded for the periods presented . tax benefits of $ 629 thousand and $ 1714 thousand related to share-based compensation deductions for stock options exercised in 2010 and 2009 , respectively , are included within additional paid-in capital of the shareholders 2019 equity section of the consolidated balance sheets. .

Question: in 2010 what was the percentage change in the unrecognized tax benefits,
Answer: -18.1%
Financial report context:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: receivables from customers; december 31 , 2017: $ 19215; december 31 , 2016: $ 10374
in millions of dollars: receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2017: 19169; december 31 , 2016: 18513
in millions of dollars: total brokerage receivables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2017: $ 38384; december 31 , 2016: $ 28887
in millions of dollars: payables to customers; december 31 , 2017: $ 38741; december 31 , 2016: $ 37237
in millions of dollars: payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2017: 22601; december 31 , 2016: 19915
in millions of dollars: total brokerage payables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2017: $ 61342; december 31 , 2016: $ 57152

Additional report context:
payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: as of december 31 2016 what is the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Answer: .93
Financial report context:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2006 2005 2004 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) $ ( 2689 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production ( 1342 ) 6648 771 .

Financial table:
( in millions ): sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs; 2006: $ -5312 ( 5312 ); 2005: $ -3754 ( 3754 ); 2004: $ -2689 ( 2689 )
( in millions ): net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production; 2006: -1342 ( 1342 ); 2005: 6648; 2004: 771
( in millions ): extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs; 2006: 1290; 2005: 700; 2004: 1349
( in millions ): development costs incurred during the period; 2006: 1251; 2005: 1030; 2004: 609
( in millions ): changes in estimated future development costs; 2006: -527 ( 527 ); 2005: -552 ( 552 ); 2004: -628 ( 628 )
( in millions ): revisions of previous quantity estimates; 2006: 1319; 2005: 820; 2004: 948
( in millions ): net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place; 2006: 30; 2005: 4557; 2004: 33
( in millions ): accretion of discount; 2006: 1882; 2005: 1124; 2004: 757
( in millions ): net change in income taxes; 2006: -660 ( 660 ); 2005: -6694 ( 6694 ); 2004: -627 ( 627 )
( in millions ): timing and other; 2006: -14 ( 14 ); 2005: 307; 2004: 97
( in millions ): net change for the year; 2006: -2083 ( 2083 ); 2005: 4186; 2004: 620
( in millions ): beginning of year; 2006: 10601; 2005: 6415; 2004: 5795
( in millions ): end of year; 2006: $ 8518; 2005: $ 10601; 2004: $ 6415
( in millions ): net change for the year from discontinued operations; 2006: $ -216 ( 216 ); 2005: $ 162; 2004: $ -152 ( 152 )

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the average upward revisions of cash flow of previous quantity estimates during the three year period , in millions?
Answer: 1029
Financial report context:
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Financial table:
september 30 2006: apple inc .; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 199; september 30 2009: $ 148; september 30 2010: $ 241; september 30 2011: $ 369; column_7: $ 495
september 30 2006: s&p 500; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 116; september 30 2009: $ 91; september 30 2010: $ 85; september 30 2011: $ 93; column_7: $ 94
september 30 2006: s&p computer hardware; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 148; september 30 2009: $ 124; september 30 2010: $ 147; september 30 2011: $ 174; column_7: $ 197
september 30 2006: dow jones us technology; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 123; september 30 2009: $ 94; september 30 2010: $ 104; september 30 2011: $ 117; column_7: $ 120

Additional report context:
.

Question: did apple achieve a greater return in the year ended sept . 30 2009 than the s&p 500?
Answer: yes