alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 1216.7
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 31.0
amount ( in millions ): ano decommissioning trust; column_2: 26.4
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: 13.1
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -15.9 ( 15.9 )
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -11.9 ( 11.9 )
amount ( in millions ): capacity acquisition recovery; column_2: -10.3 ( 10.3 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 3.2
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 1252.3

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Question: what was the ratio of the net income increase in 2010 to the decrease in 2011
Answer: 13.7
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2015 and 2014. .

Financial table:
2015: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 101.88; low: $ 93.21
2015: quarter ended june 30; high: 98.64; low: 91.99
2015: quarter ended september 30; high: 101.54; low: 86.83
2015: quarter ended december 31; high: 104.12; low: 87.23
2015: 2014; high: high; low: low
2015: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 84.90; low: $ 78.38
2015: quarter ended june 30; high: 90.73; low: 80.10
2015: quarter ended september 30; high: 99.90; low: 89.05
2015: quarter ended december 31; high: 106.31; low: 90.20

Additional report context:
on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 19 , 2016 , we had 423897556 outstanding shares of common stock and 159 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , issued in may 2014 ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 2.3 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2016 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we declared the following cash distributions: .

Question: for the= quarter ended march 31 what was the percent of the change in the stock price from the highest to the lowest
Answer: 9.3%
Financial report context:
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2008 and ending december 31 , 2013 . our peer group comprises the following 11 companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ; cvr energy , inc. ; delek us holdings , inc . ( dk ) ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; pbf energy inc . ( pbf ) ; phillips 66 ; royal dutch shell plc ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included hess corporation , but it has exited the refining business , and was replaced in our peer group by dk and pbf who are also engaged in refining operations . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

Financial table:
12/2008: valero common stock; 12/2009: $ 100.00; 12/2010: $ 79.77; 12/2011: $ 111.31; 12/2012: $ 102.57; 12/2013: $ 170.45; column_7: $ 281.24
12/2008: s&p 500; 12/2009: 100.00; 12/2010: 126.46; 12/2011: 145.51; 12/2012: 148.59; 12/2013: 172.37; column_7: 228.19
12/2008: old peer group; 12/2009: 100.00; 12/2010: 126.98; 12/2011: 122.17; 12/2012: 127.90; 12/2013: 138.09; column_7: 170.45
12/2008: new peer group; 12/2009: 100.00; 12/2010: 127.95; 12/2011: 120.42; 12/2012: 129.69; 12/2013: 136.92; column_7: 166.57

Additional report context:
____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013. .

Question: what was the percentage growth of the valero common stock from 2009 to 2011
Answer: 39.54%
Financial report context:
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2019 for the pension plans , including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. .

Financial table:
2010: 2011; $ 18181: 27090
2010: 2012; $ 18181: 21548
2010: 2013; $ 18181: 25513
2010: 2014; $ 18181: 24002
2010: 2015-2019; $ 18181: 128494

Additional report context:
substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007 . in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .

Question: what was the ratio of the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans for 2009 to 2008
Answer: 1.15
Financial report context:
the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 5 . investments and derivative instruments ( continued ) collateral arrangements the company enters into various collateral arrangements in connection with its derivative instruments , which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , collateral pledged having a fair value of $ 1.1 billion and $ 790 , respectively , was included in fixed maturities , afs , in the consolidated balance sheets . from time to time , the company enters into secured borrowing arrangements as a means to increase net investment income . the company received cash collateral of $ 33 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . the following table presents the classification and carrying amount of loaned securities and derivative instruments collateral pledged. .

Financial table:
december 31 2011: fixed maturities afs; december 31 2010: $ 1086; column_3: $ 823
december 31 2011: short-term investments; december 31 2010: 199; column_3: 2014
december 31 2011: total collateral pledged; december 31 2010: $ 1285; column_3: $ 823

Additional report context:
as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had accepted collateral with a fair value of $ 2.6 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of which $ 2.0 billion and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , was cash collateral which was invested and recorded in the consolidated balance sheets in fixed maturities and short-term investments with corresponding amounts recorded in other assets and other liabilities . the company is only permitted by contract to sell or repledge the noncash collateral in the event of a default by the counterparty . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , noncash collateral accepted was held in separate custodial accounts and was not included in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets . securities on deposit with states the company is required by law to deposit securities with government agencies in states where it conducts business . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the fair value of securities on deposit was approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .

Question: what was the ratio of the collateral pledged in 2011 to 2010
Answer: 1.39
Financial report context:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables the company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: receivables from customers; december 31 , 2018: $ 14415; december 31 , 2017: $ 19215
in millions of dollars: receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2018: 21035; december 31 , 2017: 19169
in millions of dollars: total brokerage receivables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2018: $ 35450; december 31 , 2017: $ 38384
in millions of dollars: payables to customers; december 31 , 2018: $ 40273; december 31 , 2017: $ 38741
in millions of dollars: payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2018: 24298; december 31 , 2017: 22601
in millions of dollars: total brokerage payables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2018: $ 64571; december 31 , 2017: $ 61342

Additional report context:
total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 64571 $ 61342 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker-dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: what percentage of total brokerage payables at december 31 , 2017 where receivables from customers?
Answer: 31%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2015 and 2014. .

Financial table:
2015: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 101.88; low: $ 93.21
2015: quarter ended june 30; high: 98.64; low: 91.99
2015: quarter ended september 30; high: 101.54; low: 86.83
2015: quarter ended december 31; high: 104.12; low: 87.23
2015: 2014; high: high; low: low
2015: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 84.90; low: $ 78.38
2015: quarter ended june 30; high: 90.73; low: 80.10
2015: quarter ended september 30; high: 99.90; low: 89.05
2015: quarter ended december 31; high: 106.31; low: 90.20

Additional report context:
on february 19 , 2016 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 87.32 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 19 , 2016 , we had 423897556 outstanding shares of common stock and 159 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a , issued in may 2014 ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 2.3 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2016 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income . during the year ended december 31 , 2015 , we declared the following cash distributions: .

Question: as of february 19 , 2016 what was the market capitalization
Answer: 37014734589.9
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 201020092008200720062005 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Financial table:
12/31/05: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 101.76; 12/31/08: $ 98.20; 12/31/09: $ 78.76; 12/31/10: $ 84.87; column_7: $ 110.57
12/31/05: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 115.79; 12/31/08: $ 122.16; 12/31/09: $ 76.96; 12/31/10: $ 97.33; column_7: $ 111.99
12/31/05: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 109.82; 12/31/08: $ 111.38; 12/31/09: $ 87.52; 12/31/10: $ 103.79; column_7: $ 131.59

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 10.57%
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and two customized peer groups . the old peer group includes intercontinentalexchange , inc. , nyse euronext and the nasdaq omx group inc . the new peer group is the same as the old peer group with the addition of cboe holdings , inc . which completed its initial public offering in june 2010 . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , an old peer group and a new peer group 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 cme group inc . s&p 500 old peer group *$ 100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . new peer group the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Financial table:
2006: cme group inc .; 2007: $ 139.48; 2008: $ 188.81; 2009: $ 58.66; 2010: $ 96.37; column_6: $ 93.73
2006: s&p 500; 2007: 115.80; 2008: 122.16; 2009: 76.96; 2010: 97.33; column_6: 111.99
2006: old peer group; 2007: 155.58; 2008: 190.78; 2009: 72.25; 2010: 76.11; column_6: 87.61
2006: new peer group; 2007: 155.58; 2008: 190.78; 2009: 72.25; 2010: 76.11; column_6: 87.61

Additional report context:
.

Question: did the cme group outperform the s&p 500?
Answer: no
Financial report context:
part a0ii item a05 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is listed on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201ctfx . 201d as of february 19 , 2019 , we had 473 holders of record of our common stock . a substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are beneficial owners whose shares are held by brokers and other financial institutions for the accounts of beneficial owners . stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard a0& poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december a031 , 2013 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

Financial table:
company / index: teleflex incorporated; 2013: 100; 2014: 124; 2015: 143; 2016: 177; 2017: 275; 2018: 288
company / index: s&p 500 index; 2013: 100; 2014: 114; 2015: 115; 2016: 129; 2017: 157; 2018: 150
company / index: s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index; 2013: 100; 2014: 126; 2015: 134; 2016: 142; 2017: 186; 2018: 213

Additional report context:
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 126 134 142 186 213 .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 15.3%