alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
.

Financial table:
12/07: fidelity national information services inc .; 12/08: 100.00; 12/09: 70.08; 12/10: 101.93; 12/11: 120.01; 12/12: 117.34; column_7: 157.38
12/07: s&p 500; 12/08: 100.00; 12/09: 63.00; 12/10: 79.67; 12/11: 91.67; 12/12: 93.61; column_7: 108.59
12/07: s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services; 12/08: 100.00; 12/09: 68.26; 12/10: 99.41; 12/11: 97.33; 12/12: 118.68; column_7: 151.90

Additional report context:
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . for the period ending 12/12?
Answer: 57.38%
Financial report context:
issuer purchases of equity securities the following table provides information about our repurchases of common stock during the three-month period ended december 31 , 2012 . period total number of shares purchased average price paid per total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ) amount available for future share repurchases the program ( b ) ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
period: october 1 2012 2013 october 28 2012; total number of shares purchased: 842445; average price paid per share: $ 93.38; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 842445; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): $ 2522
period: october 29 2012 2013 november 25 2012; total number of shares purchased: 872973; average price paid per share: 90.86; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 872973; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): 2443
period: november 26 2012 2013 december 31 2012; total number of shares purchased: 1395288; average price paid per share: 92.02; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 1395288; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): 2315
period: total; total number of shares purchased: 3110706; average price paid per share: $ 92.07; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program ( a ): 3110706; amount available for future share repurchases under the program ( b ) ( in millions ): $ 2315

Additional report context:
( a ) we repurchased a total of 3.1 million shares of our common stock for $ 286 million during the quarter ended december 31 , 2012 under a share repurchase program that we announced in october 2010 . ( b ) our board of directors has approved a share repurchase program for the repurchase of our common stock from time-to-time , authorizing an amount available for share repurchases of $ 6.5 billion . under the program , management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance with applicable law and regulation . the program does not have an expiration date . as of december 31 , 2012 , we had repurchased a total of 54.3 million shares under the program for $ 4.2 billion. .

Question: what is the total value of repurchased shares during december 2012 , in millions?
Answer: 128.4
Financial report context:
table of contents stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total shareholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2014 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Financial table:
12/9/2013: american airlines group inc .; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 103; column_4: $ 219
12/9/2013: amex airline index; 12/31/2013: 100; 12/31/2014: 102; column_4: 152
12/9/2013: s&p 500; 12/31/2013: 100; 12/31/2014: 102; column_4: 114

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the growth rate on the amex airline index from 12/31/2013 to 12/31/2014
Answer: 49%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities vornado 2019s common shares are traded on the new york stock exchange under the symbol 201cvno . 201d quarterly high and low sales prices of the common shares and dividends paid per share for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 were as follows : year ended year ended december 31 , 2011 december 31 , 2010 .

Financial table:
quarter: 1st; year ended december 31 2011 high: $ 93.53; year ended december 31 2011 low: $ 82.12; year ended december 31 2011 dividends: $ 0.69; year ended december 31 2011 high: $ 78.40; year ended december 31 2011 low: $ 61.25; dividends: $ 0.65
quarter: 2nd; year ended december 31 2011 high: 98.42; year ended december 31 2011 low: 86.85; year ended december 31 2011 dividends: 0.69; year ended december 31 2011 high: 86.79; year ended december 31 2011 low: 70.06; dividends: 0.65
quarter: 3rd; year ended december 31 2011 high: 98.77; year ended december 31 2011 low: 72.85; year ended december 31 2011 dividends: 0.69; year ended december 31 2011 high: 89.06; year ended december 31 2011 low: 68.59; dividends: 0.65
quarter: 4th; year ended december 31 2011 high: 84.30; year ended december 31 2011 low: 68.39; year ended december 31 2011 dividends: 0.69; year ended december 31 2011 high: 91.67; year ended december 31 2011 low: 78.06; dividends: 0.65

Additional report context:
as of february 1 , 2012 , there were 1230 holders of record of our common shares . recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2011 , we issued 20891 common shares upon the redemption of class a units of the operating partnership held by persons who received units , in private placements in earlier periods , in exchange for their interests in limited partnerships that owned real estate . the common shares were issued without registration under the securities act of 1933 in reliance on section 4 ( 2 ) of that act . information relating to compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth under part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k and such information is incorporated by reference herein . recent purchases of equity securities in december 2011 , we received 410783 vornado common shares at an average price of $ 76.36 per share as payment for the exercise of certain employee options. .

Question: was the quarterly high sales prices of the common shares and dividends paid per share for the first quarter of the year ended december 31 , 2011 higher than the fourth quarter of that period?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

Financial table:
2012: statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes; 2011: 35% ( 35 % ); column_3: 35% ( 35 % )
2012: effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits; 2011: 18; column_3: 6
2012: change in permanent reinvestment assertion; 2011: 2014; column_3: 5
2012: adjustments to valuation allowances; 2011: 21; column_3: 14
2012: tax law changes; 2011: 2014; column_3: 1
2012: effective income tax rate on continuing operations; 2011: 74% ( 74 % ); column_3: 61% ( 61 % )

Additional report context:
the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Question: by what percentage did adjustments to valuation allowances increase from 2011 to 2012>
Answer: 50%
Financial report context:
marathon oil corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( g ) this obligation relates to a lease of equipment at united states steel 2019s clairton works cokemaking facility in pennsylvania . we are the primary obligor under this lease . under the financial matters agreement , united states steel has assumed responsibility for all obligations under this lease . this lease is an amortizing financing with a final maturity of 2012 . ( h ) these notes are senior secured notes of marathon oil canada corporation . the notes are secured by substantially all of marathon oil canada corporation 2019s assets . in january 2008 , we provided a full and unconditional guarantee covering the payment of all principal and interest due under the senior notes . ( i ) these obligations as of december 31 , 2009 include $ 36 million related to assets under construction at that date for which a capital lease will commence upon completion of construction . the amounts currently reported are based upon the percent of construction completed as of december 31 , 2009 and therefore do not reflect future minimum lease obligations of $ 164 million related to the asset . ( j ) payments of long-term debt for the years 2010 - 2014 are $ 102 million , $ 246 million , $ 1492 million , $ 287 million and $ 802 million . united steel is due to pay $ 17 million in 2010 , $ 161 million in 2011 , $ 19 million in 2012 , and $ 11 for year 2014 . ( k ) in the event of a change in control , as defined in the related agreements , debt obligations totaling $ 662 million at december 31 , 2009 , may be declared immediately due and payable . ( l ) see note 16 for information on interest rate swaps . 20 . asset retirement obligations the following summarizes the changes in asset retirement obligations : ( in millions ) 2009 2008 .

Financial table:
( in millions ): asset retirement obligations as of january 1; 2009: $ 965; 2008: $ 1134
( in millions ): liabilities incurred including acquisitions; 2009: 14; 2008: 30
( in millions ): liabilities settled; 2009: -65 ( 65 ); 2008: -94 ( 94 )
( in millions ): accretion expense ( included in depreciation depletion and amortization ); 2009: 64; 2008: 66
( in millions ): revisions to previous estimates; 2009: 124; 2008: 24
( in millions ): held for sale; 2009: -; 2008: -195 ( 195 )
( in millions ): asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( a ); 2009: $ 1102; 2008: $ 965

Additional report context:
asset retirement obligations as of december 31 ( a ) $ 1102 $ 965 ( a ) includes asset retirement obligation of $ 3 and $ 2 million classified as short-term at december 31 , 2009 , and 2008. .

Question: by what percentage did asset retirement obligations decrease from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: -14.9%
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) are not covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . no customer accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 24 , 2005 or september 25 , 2004 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 24 , september 25 , september 27 .

Financial table:
september 24 2005: beginning allowance balance; september 25 2004: $ 47; september 27 2003: $ 49; column_4: $ 51
september 24 2005: charged to costs and expenses; september 25 2004: 8; september 27 2003: 3; column_4: 4
september 24 2005: deductions ( a ); september 25 2004: -9 ( 9 ); september 27 2003: -5 ( 5 ); column_4: -6 ( 6 )
september 24 2005: ending allowance balance; september 25 2004: $ 46; september 27 2003: $ 47; column_4: $ 49

Additional report context:
( a ) represents amounts written off against the allowance , net of recoveries . vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 417 million and $ 276 million as of september 24 , 2005 and september 25 , 2004 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange and interest rate risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . from time to time , the company enters into interest rate derivative agreements to modify the interest rate profile of certain investments and debt . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .

Question: what was the change in non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , between september 24 , 2005 and september 25 , 2004 , in millions?
Answer: 141
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit . the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . 2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 1043.7
amount ( in millions ): mark-to-market tax settlement sharing; column_2: -195.9 ( 195.9 )
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 32.5
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 11.6
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -5.7 ( 5.7 )
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 886.2

Additional report context:
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .

Question: in 2011 what was the ratio of the income tax benefit to the increase in the net income
Answer: 1.74
Financial report context:
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively . for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material . the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method . merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method . under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level . costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory . the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method . the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 . in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs . increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases . the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary . on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Financial table:
land improvements: buildings; 20: 39-40
land improvements: furniture fixtures and equipment; 20: 3-10

Additional report context:
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: what is the percentage change in held-to-maturity securities at cost and at fair value as of january 30 , 2009?
Answer: -8.0%