alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
asset category target allocation total quoted prices in active markets for identical assets ( level 1 ) significant observable inputs ( level 2 ) significant unobservable inputs .

Financial table:
level 3: balance as of january 1 2018; column_2: $ 278
level 3: actual return on assets; column_2: -23 ( 23 )
level 3: purchases issuances and settlements net; column_2: -25 ( 25 )
level 3: balance as of december 31 2018; column_2: $ 230

Additional report context:
balance as of january 1 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 140 actual return on assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 purchases , issuances and settlements , net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 balance as of december 31 , 2017 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 278 the company 2019s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts . the investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust . in setting new strategic asset mixes , consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the company . the company periodically updates the long-term , strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation . considerations include plan liability characteristics , liquidity needs , funding requirements , expected rates of return and the distribution of returns . in 2012 , the company implemented a de-risking strategy for the american water pension plan after conducting an asset-liability study to reduce the volatility of the funded status of the plan . as part of the de-risking strategy , the company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed- income assets relative to liabilities . the fixed income portion of the portfolio was designed to match the bond- .

Question: what was the change in value for level 3 inputs during 2018?\\n
Answer: -48
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2010; the priceline group inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2011; the priceline group inc .: 117.06; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.53; s&p 500index: 102.11; rdg internetcomposite: 102.11
measurement pointdecember 31: 2012; the priceline group inc .: 155.27; nasdaqcomposite index: 116.92; s&p 500index: 118.45; rdg internetcomposite: 122.23
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; the priceline group inc .: 290.93; nasdaqcomposite index: 166.19; s&p 500index: 156.82; rdg internetcomposite: 199.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; the priceline group inc .: 285.37; nasdaqcomposite index: 188.78; s&p 500index: 178.29; rdg internetcomposite: 195.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; the priceline group inc .: 319.10; nasdaqcomposite index: 199.95; s&p 500index: 180.75; rdg internetcomposite: 267.25

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage change between the priceline group inc . and the nasdaq composite index for the five years ended 2015?
Answer: 119.15%
Financial report context:
properties 51vornado realty trust industrial properties our dry warehouse/industrial properties consist of seven buildings in new jersey containing approximately 1.5 million square feet . the properties are encumbered by two cross-collateralized mortgage loans aggregating $ 47179000 as of december 31 , 2006 . average lease terms range from three to five years . the following table sets forth the occupancy rate and average annual rent per square foot at the end of each of the past five years . average annual occupancy rent per as of december 31 , rate square foot .

Financial table:
as of december 31,: 2006; occupancy rate: 96.9% ( 96.9 % ); average annual rent per square foot: $ 4.17
as of december 31,: 2005; occupancy rate: 100.0% ( 100.0 % ); average annual rent per square foot: 4.19
as of december 31,: 2004; occupancy rate: 88.0% ( 88.0 % ); average annual rent per square foot: 3.96
as of december 31,: 2003; occupancy rate: 88.0% ( 88.0 % ); average annual rent per square foot: 3.86
as of december 31,: 2002; occupancy rate: 100.0% ( 100.0 % ); average annual rent per square foot: 3.89

Additional report context:
220 central park south , new york city we own a 90% ( 90 % ) interest in 220 central park south . the property contains 122 rental apartments with an aggregate of 133000 square feet and 5700 square feet of commercial space . on november 7 , 2006 , we completed a $ 130000000 refinancing of the property . the loan has two tranches : the first tranche of $ 95000000 bears interest at libor ( capped at 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) ) plus 2.35% ( 2.35 % ) ( 7.70% ( 7.70 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 ) and the second tranche can be drawn up to $ 35000000 and bears interest at libor ( capped at 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) ) plus 2.45% ( 2.45 % ) ( 7.80% ( 7.80 % ) as of december 31 , 2006 ) . as of december 31 , 2006 , approximately $ 27990000 has been drawn on the second tranche . 40 east 66th street , new york city 40 east 66th street , located at madison avenue and east 66th street , contains 37 rental apartments with an aggregate of 85000 square feet , and 10000 square feet of retail space . the rental apartment operations are included in our other segment and the retail operations are included in the retail segment. .

Question: for the 2006 refinancing , as of december 31 , 2006 , approximately what percentage as been drawn on the second tranche?
Answer: 80%
Financial report context:
mastercard incorporated notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( in thousands , except percent and per share data ) the following table summarizes expected benefit payments through 2019 for the pension plans , including those payments expected to be paid from the company 2019s general assets . since the majority of the benefit payments are made in the form of lump-sum distributions , actual benefit payments may differ from expected benefit payments. .

Financial table:
2010: 2011; $ 18181: 27090
2010: 2012; $ 18181: 21548
2010: 2013; $ 18181: 25513
2010: 2014; $ 18181: 24002
2010: 2015-2019; $ 18181: 128494

Additional report context:
substantially all of the company 2019s u.s . employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan ( the 201csavings plan 201d ) sponsored by the company . the savings plan allows employees to contribute a portion of their base compensation on a pre-tax and after-tax basis in accordance with specified guidelines . the company matches a percentage of employees 2019 contributions up to certain limits . in 2007 and prior years , the company could also contribute to the savings plan a discretionary profit sharing component linked to company performance during the prior year . beginning in 2008 , the discretionary profit sharing amount related to prior year company performance was paid directly to employees as a short-term cash incentive bonus rather than as a contribution to the savings plan . in addition , the company has several defined contribution plans outside of the united states . the company 2019s contribution expense related to all of its defined contribution plans was $ 40627 , $ 35341 and $ 26996 for 2009 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively . note 13 . postemployment and postretirement benefits the company maintains a postretirement plan ( the 201cpostretirement plan 201d ) providing health coverage and life insurance benefits for substantially all of its u.s . employees hired before july 1 , 2007 . the company amended the life insurance benefits under the postretirement plan effective january 1 , 2007 . the impact , net of taxes , of this amendment was an increase of $ 1715 to accumulated other comprehensive income in 2007 . in 2009 , the company recorded a $ 3944 benefit expense as a result of enhanced postretirement medical benefits under the postretirement plan provided to employees that chose to participate in a voluntary transition program. .

Question: what is the increase observed in the expected benefit payments during 2012 and 2013?
Answer: 18.40%
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2009; column_2: $ 32452
amount ( in thousands ): 2010; column_2: 35138
amount ( in thousands ): 2011; column_2: 50421
amount ( in thousands ): 2012; column_2: 39067
amount ( in thousands ): 2013; column_2: 26301
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: 137858
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 321237
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 73512
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 247725

Additional report context:
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what percent of total lease payments is in 'years thereafter'?
Answer: .4291
Financial report context:
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) mid cap 400 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

Financial table:
company/index: a . o . smith corporation; baseperiod 12/31/11: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/12: 159.5; baseperiod 12/31/13: 275.8; baseperiod 12/31/14: 292.0; baseperiod 12/31/15: 401.0; 12/31/16: 501.4
company/index: s&p mid cap 400 index; baseperiod 12/31/11: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/12: 117.9; baseperiod 12/31/13: 157.4; baseperiod 12/31/14: 172.8; baseperiod 12/31/15: 169.0; 12/31/16: 204.1
company/index: russell 1000 index; baseperiod 12/31/11: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/12: 116.4; baseperiod 12/31/13: 155.0; baseperiod 12/31/14: 175.4; baseperiod 12/31/15: 177.0; 12/31/16: 198.4

Additional report context:
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 smith ( a o ) corp s&p midcap 400 index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the difference in total return for the five year period ended 12/31/16 between a . o . smith corporation and the s&p mid cap 400 index?
Answer: 297.3%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2013 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

Financial table:
company/index: o 2019reilly automotive inc .; december 31 , 2013: $ 100; december 31 , 2014: $ 150; december 31 , 2015: $ 197; december 31 , 2016: $ 216; december 31 , 2017: $ 187; december 31 , 2018: $ 268
company/index: s&p 500 retail index; december 31 , 2013: 100; december 31 , 2014: 110; december 31 , 2015: 137; december 31 , 2016: 143; december 31 , 2017: 184; december 31 , 2018: 208
company/index: s&p 500; december 31 , 2013: $ 100; december 31 , 2014: $ 111; december 31 , 2015: $ 111; december 31 , 2016: $ 121; december 31 , 2017: $ 145; december 31 , 2018: $ 136

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the five year change in value of the o 2019reilly automotive inc . stock?
Answer: 168
Financial report context:
table of contents performance graph the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2010 through december 31 , 2015. .

Financial table:
12/10: e*trade financial corporation; 12/11: 100.00; 12/12: 49.75; 12/13: 55.94; 12/14: 122.75; 12/15: 151.59; column_7: 185.25
12/10: s&p 500 index; 12/11: 100.00; 12/12: 102.11; 12/13: 118.45; 12/14: 156.82; 12/15: 178.29; column_7: 180.75
12/10: dow jones us financials index; 12/11: 100.00; 12/12: 87.16; 12/13: 110.56; 12/14: 148.39; 12/15: 170.04; column_7: 170.19

Additional report context:
.

Question: as of the 12/2014 what was the ratio of the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stocke*trade financial corporation to s&p 500 index
Answer: 0.85
Financial report context:
system energy resources , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis also in addition to the contractual obligations , system energy has $ 382.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits and interest net of unused tax attributes and payments for which the timing of payments beyond 12 months cannot be reasonably estimated due to uncertainties in the timing of effective settlement of tax positions . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional information regarding unrecognized tax benefits . in addition to routine spending to maintain operations , the planned capital investment estimate includes specific investments and initiatives such as the nuclear fleet operational excellence initiative , as discussed below in 201cnuclear matters , 201d and plant improvements . as a wholly-owned subsidiary , system energy dividends its earnings to entergy corporation at a percentage determined monthly . sources of capital system energy 2019s sources to meet its capital requirements include : 2022 internally generated funds ; 2022 cash on hand ; 2022 debt issuances ; and 2022 bank financing under new or existing facilities . system energy may refinance , redeem , or otherwise retire debt prior to maturity , to the extent market conditions and interest and dividend rates are favorable . all debt and common stock issuances by system energy require prior regulatory approval . debt issuances are also subject to issuance tests set forth in its bond indentures and other agreements . system energy has sufficient capacity under these tests to meet its foreseeable capital needs . system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years. .

Financial table:
2016: ( in thousands ); 2015: ( in thousands ); 2014: ( in thousands ); 2013: ( in thousands )
2016: $ 33809; 2015: $ 39926; 2014: $ 2373; 2013: $ 9223

Additional report context:
see note 4 to the financial statements for a description of the money pool . the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity has a credit facility in the amount of $ 120 million scheduled to expire in may 2019 . as of december 31 , 2016 , $ 66.9 million in letters of credit were outstanding under the credit facility to support a like amount of commercial paper issued by the system energy nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the variable interest entity credit facility . system energy obtained authorizations from the ferc through october 2017 for the following : 2022 short-term borrowings not to exceed an aggregate amount of $ 200 million at any time outstanding ; 2022 long-term borrowings and security issuances ; and 2022 long-term borrowings by its nuclear fuel company variable interest entity . see note 4 to the financial statements for further discussion of system energy 2019s short-term borrowing limits. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the system energy 2019s receivables from the money pool from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -15.3%
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

Financial table:
september 29 2007: beginning allowance balance; september 30 2006: $ 52; september 24 2005: $ 46; column_4: $ 47
september 29 2007: charged to costs and expenses; september 30 2006: 12; september 24 2005: 17; column_4: 8
september 29 2007: deductions; september 30 2006: -17 ( 17 ); september 24 2005: -11 ( 11 ); column_4: -9 ( 9 )
september 29 2007: ending allowance balance; september 30 2006: $ 47; september 24 2005: $ 52; column_4: $ 46

Additional report context:
vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the allowance for doubtful accounts from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 13%
Financial report context:
the graph below compares expeditors international of washington , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index ( nqusb2770t ) . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each of the indexes ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on 12/31/2013 and tracks it through 12/31/2018 . total return assumes reinvestment of dividends in each of the indices indicated . comparison of 5-year cumulative total return among expeditors international of washington , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the nasdaq industrial transportation index. .

Financial table:
12/13: expeditors international of washington inc .; 12/14: $ 100.00; 12/15: $ 100.81; 12/16: $ 101.92; 12/17: $ 119.68; 12/18: $ 146.19; column_7: $ 153.88
12/13: standard and poor's 500 index; 12/14: 100.00; 12/15: 111.39; 12/16: 110.58; 12/17: 121.13; 12/18: 144.65; column_7: 135.63
12/13: nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ); 12/14: 100.00; 12/15: 121.41; 12/16: 93.55; 12/17: 120.89; 12/18: 154.19; column_7: 140.25

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the difference in percentage of cumulative total return between expeditors international of washington inc . and the nasdaq industrial transportation ( nqusb2770t ) for the 5 year period ending 12/18?
Answer: 13.63%
Financial report context:
.

Financial table:
12/07: fidelity national information services inc .; 12/08: 100.00; 12/09: 70.08; 12/10: 101.93; 12/11: 120.01; 12/12: 117.34; column_7: 157.38
12/07: s&p 500; 12/08: 100.00; 12/09: 63.00; 12/10: 79.67; 12/11: 91.67; 12/12: 93.61; column_7: 108.59
12/07: s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services; 12/08: 100.00; 12/09: 68.26; 12/10: 99.41; 12/11: 97.33; 12/12: 118.68; column_7: 151.90

Additional report context:
s&p supercap data processing & outsourced 100.00 68.26 99.41 97.33 118.68 151.90 item 6 . selected financial data . the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , and item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , included elsewhere in this report . on october 1 , 2009 , we completed the acquisition of metavante technologies , inc . ( "metavante" ) . the results of operations and financial position of metavante are included in the consolidated financial statements since the date of acquisition . on july 2 , 2008 , we completed the spin-off of lender processing services , inc. , which was a former wholly-owned subsidiary ( "lps" ) . for accounting purposes , the results of lps are presented as discontinued operations . accordingly , all prior periods have been restated to present the results of fis on a stand alone basis and include the results of lps up to july 2 , 2008 , as discontinued operations. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in fidelity national information services from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: -29.9%