alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters recent sales of unregistered securities during the fourth quarter of 2003 , aes issued an aggregated of 20.2 million shares of its common stock in exchange for $ 20 million aggregate principal amount of its senior notes . the shares were issued without registration in reliance upon section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) under the securities act of 1933 . market information our common stock is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( 2018 2018nyse 2019 2019 ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for our common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Financial table:
2003 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 4.04: 8.37; low $ 2.72: 3.75; 2002 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 17.84: 9.17; low $ 4.11: 3.55
2003 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 4.04: 7.70; low $ 2.72: 5.91; 2002 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 17.84: 4.61; low $ 4.11: 1.56
2003 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 4.04: 9.50; low $ 2.72: 7.57; 2002 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 17.84: 3.57; low $ 4.11: 0.95

Additional report context:
holders as of march 3 , 2004 , there were 9026 record holders of our common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends under the terms of our senior secured credit facilities , which we entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , we are not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , under the terms of a guaranty we provided to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project , we are precluded from paying cash dividends on our common stock if we do not meet certain net worth and liquidity tests . our project subsidiaries 2019 ability to declare and pay cash dividends to us is subject to certain limitations contained in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements that our project subsidiaries are subject to . see item 12 ( d ) of this form 10-k for information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans. .

Question: in q1 2003 , what was the average of the high and low stock price?
Answer: 3.38
Financial report context:
apple inc . | 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Financial table:
september2011: apple inc .; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 166; september2014: $ 123; september2015: $ 183; september2016: $ 212; column_7: $ 213
september2011: s&p 500 index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 130; september2014: $ 155; september2015: $ 186; september2016: $ 185; column_7: $ 213
september2011: s&p information technology index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 132; september2014: $ 142; september2015: $ 183; september2016: $ 187; column_7: $ 230
september2011: dow jones u.s . technology supersector index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 130; september2014: $ 137; september2015: $ 178; september2016: $ 177; column_7: $ 217

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the cumulative change in the s&p 500 between 2016 and 2011?
Answer: 113
Financial report context:
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 644.2
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -35.1 ( 35.1 )
amount ( in millions ): purchased power capacity; column_2: -5.9 ( 5.9 )
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: -5.4 ( 5.4 )
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: 5.6
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 19.0
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 4.4
amount ( in millions ): 2017 net revenue; column_2: $ 626.8

Additional report context:
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: based on analysis of the change in net revenue what was the percentage change in the net revenue from 2016 to 2017
Answer: -2.7%
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

Financial table:
12/31/2011: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/2012: $ 100.00; 12/31/2013: $ 103.84; 12/31/2014: $ 152.16; 12/31/2015: $ 165.35; 12/31/2016: $ 154.61; column_7: $ 189.72
12/31/2011: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/2012: $ 100.00; 12/31/2013: $ 115.99; 12/31/2014: $ 153.54; 12/31/2015: $ 174.54; 12/31/2016: $ 176.94; column_7: $ 198.09
12/31/2011: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/2012: $ 100.00; 12/31/2013: $ 107.49; 12/31/2014: $ 151.97; 12/31/2015: $ 190.07; 12/31/2016: $ 158.22; column_7: $ 192.80

Additional report context:
.

Question: for the five year period ending 12/31/2016 what was the difference in total performance between united parcel service inc . and the dow jones transportation average?
Answer: -3.08%
Financial report context:
nbcuniversal media , llc consolidated statement of comprehensive income .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): net income; 2015: $ 3624; 2014: $ 3297; 2013: $ 2122
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): deferred gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges net; 2015: -21 ( 21 ); 2014: 25; 2013: -5 ( 5 )
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): employee benefit obligations net; 2015: 60; 2014: -106 ( 106 ); 2013: 95
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): currency translation adjustments net; 2015: -121 ( 121 ); 2014: -62 ( 62 ); 2013: -41 ( 41 )
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): comprehensive income; 2015: 3542; 2014: 3154; 2013: 2171
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): net ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests; 2015: -210 ( 210 ); 2014: -182 ( 182 ); 2013: -154 ( 154 )
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests; 2015: 29; 2014: 2014; 2013: 2014
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal; 2015: $ 3361; 2014: $ 2972; 2013: $ 2017

Additional report context:
see accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements . 147 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 47%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2013: $ 100.00; 2014: $ 109.88; 2015: $ 119.07; 2016: $ 160.23; 2017: $ 203.07; 2018: $ 189.57
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 109.36; 2015: 109.90; 2016: 141.23; 2017: 167.49; 2018: 137.82
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 115.18; 2015: 113.38; 2016: 139.17; 2017: 169.98; 2018: 147.82
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 113.68; 2015: 115.24; 2016: 129.02; 2017: 157.17; 2018: 150.27

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: what is the estimated average return for the s&p financial index and the s&p 500 index in the firs year of the investment of $ 100?
Answer: 14.43%
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased slightly , by $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and a lower effective income tax rate , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , lower other income , and higher interest expense . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 2408.8
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 69.0
amount ( in millions ): transmission equalization; column_2: -6.5 ( 6.5 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -6.7 ( 6.7 )
amount ( in millions ): louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation; column_2: -17.2 ( 17.2 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -9.0 ( 9.0 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 2438.4

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in formula rate plan revenues , implemented with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , to collect the estimated first-year revenue requirement related to the purchase of power blocks 3 and 4 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion . the transmission equalization variance is primarily due to changes in transmission investments , including entergy louisiana 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential sales , partially offset by an increase in industrial usage and an increase in volume during the unbilled period . the increase .

Question: assuming the retail electric price increase wouldn't have occured , what would 2016 net revenue have been , in millions?
Answer: 2369.4
Financial report context:
the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 5 . investments and derivative instruments ( continued ) collateral arrangements the company enters into various collateral arrangements in connection with its derivative instruments , which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , collateral pledged having a fair value of $ 1.1 billion and $ 790 , respectively , was included in fixed maturities , afs , in the consolidated balance sheets . from time to time , the company enters into secured borrowing arrangements as a means to increase net investment income . the company received cash collateral of $ 33 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . the following table presents the classification and carrying amount of loaned securities and derivative instruments collateral pledged. .

Financial table:
december 31 2011: fixed maturities afs; december 31 2010: $ 1086; column_3: $ 823
december 31 2011: short-term investments; december 31 2010: 199; column_3: 2014
december 31 2011: total collateral pledged; december 31 2010: $ 1285; column_3: $ 823

Additional report context:
as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had accepted collateral with a fair value of $ 2.6 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of which $ 2.0 billion and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , was cash collateral which was invested and recorded in the consolidated balance sheets in fixed maturities and short-term investments with corresponding amounts recorded in other assets and other liabilities . the company is only permitted by contract to sell or repledge the noncash collateral in the event of a default by the counterparty . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , noncash collateral accepted was held in separate custodial accounts and was not included in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets . securities on deposit with states the company is required by law to deposit securities with government agencies in states where it conducts business . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the fair value of securities on deposit was approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .

Question: in 2011 what was the percent of the total collateral loaned securities and derivative instruments collateral pledged that was associated with short-term investments
Answer: 15.5%
Financial report context:
annual report on form 10-k 108 fifth third bancorp part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the information required by this item is included in the corporate information found on the inside of the back cover and in the discussion of dividend limitations that the subsidiaries can pay to the bancorp discussed in note 26 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements . additionally , as of december 31 , 2008 , the bancorp had approximately 60025 shareholders of record . issuer purchases of equity securities period shares purchased average paid per shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum shares that may be purchased under the plans or programs .

Financial table:
period: october 2008; sharespurchased ( a ): 25394; averagepricepaid pershare: $ -; sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms: -; maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms: 19201518
period: november 2008; sharespurchased ( a ): 7526; averagepricepaid pershare: -; sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms: -; maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms: 19201518
period: december 2008; sharespurchased ( a ): 40; averagepricepaid pershare: -; sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms: -; maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms: 19201518
period: total; sharespurchased ( a ): 32960; averagepricepaid pershare: $ -; sharespurchasedas part ofpubliclyannouncedplans orprograms: -; maximumshares thatmay bepurchasedunder theplans orprograms: 19201518

Additional report context:
( a ) the bancorp repurchased 25394 , 7526 and 40 shares during october , november and december of 2008 in connection with various employee compensation plans of the bancorp . these purchases are not included against the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the board of directors authorization. .

Question: what portion of the total purchased shares presented in the table was purchased during november 2008?
Answer: 22.8%
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and two customized peer groups . the old peer group includes intercontinentalexchange , inc. , nyse euronext and the nasdaq omx group inc . the new peer group is the same as the old peer group with the addition of cboe holdings , inc . which completed its initial public offering in june 2010 . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , an old peer group and a new peer group 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 cme group inc . s&p 500 old peer group *$ 100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . new peer group the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Financial table:
2006: cme group inc .; 2007: $ 139.48; 2008: $ 188.81; 2009: $ 58.66; 2010: $ 96.37; column_6: $ 93.73
2006: s&p 500; 2007: 115.80; 2008: 122.16; 2009: 76.96; 2010: 97.33; column_6: 111.99
2006: old peer group; 2007: 155.58; 2008: 190.78; 2009: 72.25; 2010: 76.11; column_6: 87.61
2006: new peer group; 2007: 155.58; 2008: 190.78; 2009: 72.25; 2010: 76.11; column_6: 87.61

Additional report context:
.

Question: considering the year 2006 , what is the percentual fluctuation of the return provided by s&p 500 and the one provided by old peer group?
Answer: 39.78%
Financial report context:
j a c k h e n r y . c o m 1 5 market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the company 2019s common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market ( 201cnasdaq 201d ) under the symbol 201cjkhy 201d . the company established a practice of paying quarterly dividends at the end of fiscal 1990 and has paid dividends with respect to every quarter since that time . the declaration and payment of any future dividends will continue to be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon , among other factors , our earnings , capital requirements , contractual restrictions , and operating and financial condition . the company does not currently foresee any changes in its dividend practices . on august 15 , 2019 , there were approximately 145300 holders of the company 2019s common stock , including individual participants in security position listings . on that same date the last sale price of the common shares as reported on nasdaq was $ 141.94 per share . issuer purchases of equity securities the following shares of the company were repurchased during the quarter ended june 30 , 2019 : total number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price of total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ) maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ) .

Financial table:
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): april 1- april 30 2019; average price of share: 2014; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 2014; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 2014; column_5: 3732713
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): may 1- may 31 2019; average price of share: 250000; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 134.35; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 250000; column_5: 3482713
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): june 1- june 30 2019; average price of share: 2014; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 2014; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 2014; column_5: 3482713
total number of shares purchased ( 1 ): total; average price of share: 250000; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans ( 1 ): $ 134.35; maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans ( 2 ): 250000; column_5: 3482713

Additional report context:
( 1 ) 250000 shares were purchased through a publicly announced repurchase plan . there were no shares surrendered to the company to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with employee restricted stock awards . ( 2 ) total stock repurchase authorizations approved by the company 2019s board of directors as of february 17 , 2015 were for 30.0 million shares . these authorizations have no specific dollar or share price targets and no expiration dates. .

Question: on august 15 , 2019 , what was the total market value of the approximately 145300 shares of the company 2019s common stock as reported on nasdaq ?
Answer: 20623882