alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
.

Financial table:
currency: real; 2012: $ 40.4; 2011: $ 42.4; 2010: $ 32.5
currency: euro; 2012: 27.1; 2011: 26.4; 2010: 18.6
currency: pound sterling; 2012: 18.5; 2011: 17.6; 2010: 9.0
currency: indian rupee; 2012: 4.3; 2011: 3.6; 2010: 2.6
currency: total impact; 2012: $ 90.3; 2011: $ 90.0; 2010: $ 62.7

Additional report context:
the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant . revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes . we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the impact of euro from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 2.7%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested . no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock . stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns . comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc . nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .

Financial table:
july 27 2000: illumina inc .; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 100.39; december 27 2002: 71.44; december 26 2003: 19.50; column_6: 43.81
july 27 2000: nasdaq composite index; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 63.84; december 27 2002: 51.60; december 26 2003: 35.34; column_6: 51.73
july 27 2000: nasdaq pharmaceutical index; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 93.20; december 27 2002: 82.08; december 26 2003: 51.96; column_6: 74.57

Additional report context:
.

Question: at december 292000 what was the ratio of the nasdaq composite index to the nasdaq pharmaceutical index
Answer: 0.685
Financial report context:
other items on our consolidated financial statements have been appropriately adjusted from the amounts provided in the earnings release , including a reduction of our full year 2016 gross profit and income from operations by $ 2.9 million , and a reduction of net income by $ 1.7 million. .

Financial table:
( in thousands ): cash and cash equivalents; at december 31 , 2016: $ 250470; at december 31 , 2015: $ 129852; at december 31 , 2014: $ 593175; at december 31 , 2013: $ 347489; at december 31 , 2012: $ 341841
( in thousands ): working capital ( 1 ); at december 31 , 2016: 1279337; at december 31 , 2015: 1019953; at december 31 , 2014: 1127772; at december 31 , 2013: 702181; at december 31 , 2012: 651370
( in thousands ): inventories; at december 31 , 2016: 917491; at december 31 , 2015: 783031; at december 31 , 2014: 536714; at december 31 , 2013: 469006; at december 31 , 2012: 319286
( in thousands ): total assets; at december 31 , 2016: 3644331; at december 31 , 2015: 2865970; at december 31 , 2014: 2092428; at december 31 , 2013: 1576369; at december 31 , 2012: 1155052
( in thousands ): total debt including current maturities; at december 31 , 2016: 817388; at december 31 , 2015: 666070; at december 31 , 2014: 281546; at december 31 , 2013: 151551; at december 31 , 2012: 59858
( in thousands ): total stockholders 2019 equity; at december 31 , 2016: $ 2030900; at december 31 , 2015: $ 1668222; at december 31 , 2014: $ 1350300; at december 31 , 2013: $ 1053354; at december 31 , 2012: $ 816922

Additional report context:
( 1 ) working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. .

Question: what was the percentage change in working capital from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 25%
Financial report context:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2004 2003 2002 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation , and administrative costs $ ( 2715 ) $ ( 2487 ) $ ( 1983 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 950 1178 2795 .

Financial table:
( in millions ): sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs; 2004: $ -2715 ( 2715 ); 2003: $ -2487 ( 2487 ); 2002: $ -1983 ( 1983 )
( in millions ): net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production; 2004: 950; 2003: 1178; 2002: 2795
( in millions ): extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs; 2004: 1352; 2003: 618; 2002: 1032
( in millions ): development costs incurred during the period; 2004: 711; 2003: 802; 2002: 499
( in millions ): changes in estimated future development costs; 2004: -556 ( 556 ); 2003: -478 ( 478 ); 2002: -297 ( 297 )
( in millions ): revisions of previous quantity estimates; 2004: 494; 2003: 348; 2002: 311
( in millions ): net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place; 2004: 33; 2003: -531 ( 531 ); 2002: 737
( in millions ): net change in exchanges of minerals in place; 2004: 2013; 2003: 403; 2002: 2013
( in millions ): accretion of discount; 2004: 790; 2003: 807; 2002: 417
( in millions ): net change in income taxes; 2004: -529 ( 529 ); 2003: 65; 2002: -1288 ( 1288 )
( in millions ): timing and other; 2004: -62 ( 62 ); 2003: -165 ( 165 ); 2002: 2
( in millions ): net change for the year; 2004: 468; 2003: 560; 2002: 2225
( in millions ): beginning of year; 2004: 6001; 2003: 5441; 2002: 3216
( in millions ): end of year; 2004: $ 6469; 2003: $ 6001; 2002: $ 5441
( in millions ): net change for the year from discontinued operations; 2004: $ 2013; 2003: $ -384 ( 384 ); 2002: $ 212

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the average ending balance in the discounted ending cash flow balance?
Answer: 5970
Financial report context:
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Financial table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2002; snap-on incorporated: $ 100.00; peer group ( 3 ): $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2003; snap-on incorporated: 118.80; peer group ( 3 ): 126.16; s&p 500: 128.68
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2004; snap-on incorporated: 130.66; peer group ( 3 ): 152.42; s&p 500: 142.69
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2005; snap-on incorporated: 146.97; peer group ( 3 ): 157.97; s&p 500: 149.70
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2006; snap-on incorporated: 191.27; peer group ( 3 ): 185.10; s&p 500: 173.34
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2007; snap-on incorporated: 198.05; peer group ( 3 ): 216.19; s&p 500: 182.87

Additional report context:
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation . ( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w . grainger , inc. .

Question: what is the roi in snap-on if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Answer: 34.8%
Financial report context:
item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters , and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock ( ticker symbol apd ) is listed on the new york stock exchange . our transfer agent and registrar is broadridge corporate issuer solutions , inc. , p.o . box 1342 , brentwood , new york 11717 , telephone ( 844 ) 318-0129 ( u.s. ) or ( 720 ) 358-3595 ( all other locations ) ; website , http://shareholder.broadridge.com/ airproducts ; and e-mail address , shareholder@broadridge.com . as of 31 october 2018 , there were 5391 record holders of our common stock . cash dividends on the company 2019s common stock are paid quarterly . it is our expectation that we will continue to pay cash dividends in the future at comparable or increased levels . the board of directors determines whether to declare dividends and the timing and amount based on financial condition and other factors it deems relevant . dividend information for each quarter of fiscal years 2018 and 2017 is summarized below: .

Financial table:
2018: first quarter; 2017: $ .95; column_3: $ .86
2018: second quarter; 2017: 1.10; column_3: .95
2018: third quarter; 2017: 1.10; column_3: .95
2018: fourth quarter; 2017: 1.10; column_3: .95
2018: total; 2017: $ 4.25; column_3: $ 3.71

Additional report context:
purchases of equity securities by the issuer on 15 september 2011 , the board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 1.0 billion of our outstanding common stock . this program does not have a stated expiration date . we repurchase shares pursuant to rules 10b5-1 and 10b-18 under the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , through repurchase agreements established with one or more brokers . there were no purchases of stock during fiscal year 2018 . at 30 september 2018 , $ 485.3 million in share repurchase authorization remained . additional purchases will be completed at the company 2019s discretion while maintaining sufficient funds for investing in its businesses and growth opportunities. .

Question: what is the increase observed in the payment of dividends during 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 14.55%
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

Financial table:
12/31/2007: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 80.20; 12/31/2010: $ 86.42; 12/31/2011: $ 112.60; 12/31/2012: $ 116.97; column_7: $ 121.46
12/31/2007: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 63.00; 12/31/2010: $ 79.67; 12/31/2011: $ 91.68; 12/31/2012: $ 93.61; column_7: $ 108.59
12/31/2007: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 78.58; 12/31/2010: $ 93.19; 12/31/2011: $ 118.14; 12/31/2012: $ 118.15; column_7: $ 127.07

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . for the five years ended 12/31/2012?
Answer: 21.46%
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of related tax , are as follows: .

Financial table:
( millions ) as of december 31: net derivative gains ( losses ); 2007: $ 24; 2006: $ 15; 2005: $ -11 ( 11 )
( millions ) as of december 31: net unrealized investment gains; 2007: 76; 2006: 73; 2005: 52
( millions ) as of december 31: net foreign exchange translation; 2007: 284; 2006: 118; 2005: -119 ( 119 )
( millions ) as of december 31: postretirement plans; 2007: -1110 ( 1110 ); 2006: -1216 ( 1216 ); 2005: -1077 ( 1077 )
( millions ) as of december 31: accumulated other comprehensive loss; 2007: $ -726 ( 726 ); 2006: $ -1010 ( 1010 ); 2005: $ -1155 ( 1155 )

Additional report context:
aon corporation .

Question: what is the percentual increase observed in the net derivative gains during 2006 and 2007?
Answer: 60%
Financial report context:
2 0 1 9 a n n u a l r e p o r t1 6 performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2019 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2014: jkhy; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 110.51; 2017: 151.12; 2018: 182.15; 2019: 231.36; column_7: 240.29
2014: 2019 peer group; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 126.23; 2017: 142.94; 2018: 166.15; 2019: 224.73; column_7: 281.09
2014: 2018 peer group; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 127.40; 2017: 151.16; 2018: 177.26; 2019: 228.97; column_7: 286.22
2014: s&p 500; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 107.42; 2017: 111.71; 2018: 131.70; 2019: 150.64; column_7: 166.33

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2014 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . some peer participant companies were different for fiscal year ended 2019 compared to fiscal year ended 2018 . the company 2019s compensation committee of the board of directors adjusted the peer participants due to consolidations within the industry during the 2019 fiscal year . companies in the 2019 peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; black knight , inc. ; bottomline technologies , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions , inc. ; cardtronics plc ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; exlservice holdings , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; fleetcor technologies , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; square , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total system services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verint systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . companies in the 2018 peer group were aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone .

Question: what was the percentage growth of the 5 year- cumulative total return for the 2018 peer group from 2016 to 2017
Answer: 17.3%
Financial report context:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Financial table:
2004: loews common stock; 2005: 100.00; 2006: 135.92; 2007: 179.47; 2008: 219.01; 2009: 123.70; column_7: 160.62
2004: s&p 500 index; 2005: 100.00; 2006: 104.91; 2007: 121.48; 2008: 128.16; 2009: 80.74; column_7: 102.11
2004: loews peer group ( a ); 2005: 100.00; 2006: 133.59; 2007: 152.24; 2008: 174.46; 2009: 106.30; column_7: 136.35

Additional report context:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , cabot oil & gas corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco international incorporated , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p. , noble corporation , range resources corporation , spectra energy corporation ( included from december 14 , 2006 when it began trading ) , transocean , ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2009 and 2008 . we paid quarterly cash dividends on the former carolina group stock until the separation . regular dividends of $ 0.455 per share of the former carolina group stock were paid in the first and second quarters of 2008. .

Question: what is the return on investment for s&p500 from 2007 to 2008?
Answer: -37.0%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Financial table:
december 31 2008: disca; december 31 2009: $ 102.53; december 31 2010: $ 222.09; december 31 2011: $ 301.96; column_5: $ 296.67
december 31 2008: discb; december 31 2009: $ 78.53; december 31 2010: $ 162.82; december 31 2011: $ 225.95; column_5: $ 217.56
december 31 2008: disck; december 31 2009: $ 83.69; december 31 2010: $ 165.75; december 31 2011: $ 229.31; column_5: $ 235.63
december 31 2008: s&p 500; december 31 2009: $ 74.86; december 31 2010: $ 92.42; december 31 2011: $ 104.24; column_5: $ 104.23
december 31 2008: peer group; december 31 2009: $ 68.79; december 31 2010: $ 100.70; december 31 2011: $ 121.35; column_5: $ 138.19

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on discb from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2011?
Answer: 117.56%