alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 39 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2012: $ 100.00; 2013: $ 136.71; 2014: $ 150.22; 2015: $ 162.79; 2016: $ 219.06; 2017: $ 277.62
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 137.76; 2014: 150.66; 2015: 151.39; 2016: 194.55; 2017: 230.72
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 135.59; 2014: 156.17; 2015: 153.72; 2016: 188.69; 2017: 230.47
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 132.37; 2014: 150.48; 2015: 152.55; 2016: 170.78; 2017: 208.05

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 201720162015201420132012 .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Financial table:
global payments: may 31 2002; s&p 500: $ 100.00; s&p information technology: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
global payments: may 31 2003; s&p 500: 94.20; s&p information technology: 91.94; column_4: 94.48
global payments: may 31 2004; s&p 500: 129.77; s&p information technology: 108.79; column_4: 115.24
global payments: may 31 2005; s&p 500: 193.30; s&p information technology: 117.75; column_4: 116.29
global payments: may 31 2006; s&p 500: 260.35; s&p information technology: 127.92; column_4: 117.14
global payments: may 31 2007; s&p 500: 224.24; s&p information technology: 157.08; column_4: 144.11

Additional report context:
issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 37.8%
Financial report context:
have access to liquidity by issuing bonds to public or private investors based on our assessment of the current condition of the credit markets . at december 31 , 2009 , we had a working capital surplus of approximately $ 1.0 billion , which reflects our decision to maintain additional cash reserves to enhance liquidity in response to difficult economic conditions . at december 31 , 2008 , we had a working capital deficit of approximately $ 100 million . historically , we have had a working capital deficit , which is common in our industry and does not indicate a lack of liquidity . we maintain adequate resources and , when necessary , have access to capital to meet any daily and short-term cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows millions of dollars 2009 2008 2007 .

Financial table:
millions of dollars: cash provided by operating activities; 2009: $ 3234; 2008: $ 4070; 2007: $ 3277
millions of dollars: cash used in investing activities; 2009: -2175 ( 2175 ); 2008: -2764 ( 2764 ); 2007: -2426 ( 2426 )
millions of dollars: cash used in financing activities; 2009: -458 ( 458 ); 2008: -935 ( 935 ); 2007: -800 ( 800 )
millions of dollars: net change in cash and cash equivalents; 2009: $ 601; 2008: $ 371; 2007: $ 51

Additional report context:
operating activities lower net income in 2009 , a reduction of $ 184 million in the outstanding balance of our accounts receivable securitization program , higher pension contributions of $ 72 million , and changes to working capital combined to decrease cash provided by operating activities compared to 2008 . higher net income and changes in working capital combined to increase cash provided by operating activities in 2008 compared to 2007 . in addition , accelerated tax deductions enacted in 2008 on certain new operating assets resulted in lower income tax payments in 2008 versus 2007 . voluntary pension contributions in 2008 totaling $ 200 million and other pension contributions of $ 8 million partially offset the year-over-year increase versus 2007 . investing activities lower capital investments and higher proceeds from asset sales drove the decrease in cash used in investing activities in 2009 versus 2008 . increased capital investments and lower proceeds from asset sales drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2008 compared to 2007. .

Question: without the 2008 voluntary pension contributions , how much cash would have been provided by operating activities , in millions?
Answer: 4270
Financial report context:
comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph compares the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2004 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended .

Financial table:
december 31: 2005; citigroup: 104.38; s&p 500 index: 104.83; s&p financial index: 106.30
december 31: 2006; citigroup: 124.02; s&p 500 index: 121.20; s&p financial index: 126.41
december 31: 2007; citigroup: 70.36; s&p 500 index: 127.85; s&p financial index: 103.47
december 31: 2008; citigroup: 18.71; s&p 500 index: 81.12; s&p financial index: 47.36
december 31: 2009; citigroup: 9.26; s&p 500 index: 102.15; s&p financial index: 55.27

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percent of the decline on the citigroup cumulative total return from 2007 to 2008
Answer: 73.4%
Financial report context:
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

Financial table:
2012: state street corporation; 2013: $ 100; 2014: $ 159; 2015: $ 172; 2016: $ 148; 2017: $ 178; column_7: $ 227
2012: s&p 500 index; 2013: 100; 2014: 132; 2015: 151; 2016: 153; 2017: 171; column_7: 208
2012: s&p financial index; 2013: 100; 2014: 136; 2015: 156; 2016: 154; 2017: 189; column_7: 230
2012: kbw bank index; 2013: 100; 2014: 138; 2015: 151; 2016: 151; 2017: 195; column_7: 231

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment is state street corporation from 2012 to 2015?
Answer: 48%
Financial report context:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Financial table:
date: 31-dec-2011; citi: 100.0; s&p 500: 100.0; s&p financials: 100.0
date: 31-dec-2012; citi: 150.6; s&p 500: 116.0; s&p financials: 128.8
date: 31-dec-2013; citi: 198.5; s&p 500: 153.6; s&p financials: 174.7
date: 31-dec-2014; citi: 206.3; s&p 500: 174.6; s&p financials: 201.3
date: 31-dec-2015; citi: 197.8; s&p 500: 177.0; s&p financials: 198.2
date: 31-dec-2016; citi: 229.3; s&p 500: 198.2; s&p financials: 243.4

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for citi common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2016?
Answer: 129.3%
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue; column_2: $ 991.1
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: -17.1 ( 17.1 )
amount ( in millions ): purchased power capacity; column_2: -12.0 ( 12.0 )
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -7.4 ( 7.4 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 4.6
amount ( in millions ): 2008 net revenue; column_2: $ 959.2

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: -34.3%
Financial report context:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's compensation survey group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2010 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ) s&p 500 index .

Financial table:
date: december 31 2010; pmi: $ 100.00; pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ): $ 100.00; s&p 500 index: $ 100.00
date: december 31 2011; pmi: $ 139.80; pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ): $ 114.10; s&p 500 index: $ 102.10
date: december 31 2012; pmi: $ 154.60; pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ): $ 128.00; s&p 500 index: $ 118.50
date: december 31 2013; pmi: $ 167.70; pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ): $ 163.60; s&p 500 index: $ 156.80
date: december 31 2014; pmi: $ 164.20; pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ): $ 170.10; s&p 500 index: $ 178.30
date: december 31 2015; pmi: $ 186.20; pmi compensation survey group ( 12 ): $ 179.20; s&p 500 index: $ 180.80

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the pmi compensation survey group consists of the following companies with substantial global sales that are direct competitors ; or have similar market capitalization ; or are primarily focused on consumer products ( excluding high technology and financial services ) ; and are companies for which comparative executive compensation data are readily available : bayer ag , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , diageo plc , glaxosmithkline , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc ( formerly , imperial tobacco group plc ) , johnson & johnson , mcdonald's corp. , international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , novartis ag , pepsico , inc. , pfizer inc. , roche holding ag , unilever nv and plc and vodafone group plc . ( 2 ) on october 1 , 2012 , international , inc . ( nasdaq : mdlz ) , formerly kraft foods inc. , announced that it had completed the spin-off of its north american grocery business , kraft foods group , inc . ( nasdaq : krft ) . international , inc . was retained in the pmi compensation survey group index because of its global footprint . the pmi compensation survey group index total cumulative return calculation weights international , inc.'s total shareholder return at 65% ( 65 % ) of historical kraft foods inc.'s market capitalization on december 31 , 2010 , based on international , inc.'s initial market capitalization relative to the combined market capitalization of international , inc . and kraft foods group , inc . on october 2 , 2012 . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock for the five years ended december 31 , 2015?
Answer: 86.20%
Financial report context:
14 2018 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2018 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2013: jkhy; 2014: 100.00; 2015: 128.02; 2016: 141.48; 2017: 193.46; 2018: 233.19; column_7: 296.19
2013: peer group; 2014: 100.00; 2015: 137.07; 2016: 171.80; 2017: 198.44; 2018: 231.11; column_7: 297.44
2013: s&p 500; 2014: 100.00; 2015: 124.61; 2016: 133.86; 2017: 139.20; 2018: 164.11; column_7: 187.70

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2013 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . dst systems , inc. , which had previously been part of the peer group , was acquired in 2018 and is no longer a public company . as a result , dst systems , inc . has been removed from the peer group and stock performance graph . the stock performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. .

Question: what was the cumulative total return for the peer group over the five years?
Answer: 197.44
Financial report context:
2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 696.3
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 12.9
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 4.7
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -2.4 ( 2.4 )
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: -2.8 ( 2.8 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -3.3 ( 3.3 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 705.4

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . a0 see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november 2015 . the reserve equalization revenue variance is primarily due to the absence of reserve equalization revenue as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting from entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement in november other income statement variances 2017 compared to 2016 other operation and maintenance expenses decreased primarily due to : 2022 a decrease of $ 12 million in fossil-fueled generation expenses primarily due to lower long-term service agreement costs and a lower scope of work done during plant outages in 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 ; and 2022 a decrease of $ 3.6 million in storm damage provisions . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion on storm cost recovery . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of $ 4.8 million in energy efficiency costs and an increase of $ 2.7 million in compensation and benefits costs primarily due to higher incentive-based compensation accruals in 2017 as compared to the prior year . entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis .

Question: in 2016 what was the percentage change in net revenue
Answer: 1.3%
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; booking holdings inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; booking holdings inc .: 98.09; nasdaqcomposite index: 114.62; s&p 500index: 113.69; rdg internetcomposite: 96.39
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; booking holdings inc .: 109.68; nasdaqcomposite index: 122.81; s&p 500index: 115.26; rdg internetcomposite: 133.20
measurement pointdecember 31: 2016; booking holdings inc .: 126.12; nasdaqcomposite index: 133.19; s&p 500index: 129.05; rdg internetcomposite: 140.23
measurement pointdecember 31: 2017; booking holdings inc .: 149.50; nasdaqcomposite index: 172.11; s&p 500index: 157.22; rdg internetcomposite: 202.15
measurement pointdecember 31: 2018; booking holdings inc .: 148.18; nasdaqcomposite index: 165.84; s&p 500index: 150.33; rdg internetcomposite: 201.16

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage change in booking holding inc . for the five years ended 2018?
Answer: 48.18%