alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 1362.2
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 161.5
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -3.2 ( 3.2 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 1520.5

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what would 2016 net revenue have been if it was impacted by the same higher other operation and maintenance expenses that impacted the prior year ( in millions ) ?
Answer: 1473.4
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2012 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average and our class b common stock. .

Financial table:
12/31/2012: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/2013: $ 100.00; 12/31/2014: $ 146.54; 12/31/2015: $ 159.23; 12/31/2016: $ 148.89; 12/31/2017: $ 182.70; column_7: $ 195.75
12/31/2012: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/2013: $ 100.00; 12/31/2014: $ 132.38; 12/31/2015: $ 150.49; 12/31/2016: $ 152.55; 12/31/2017: $ 170.79; column_7: $ 208.06
12/31/2012: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/2013: $ 100.00; 12/31/2014: $ 141.38; 12/31/2015: $ 176.83; 12/31/2016: $ 147.19; 12/31/2017: $ 179.37; column_7: $ 213.49

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the total cumulative percentage return on investment on class b common stock for the five years ended 122/31/2017?
Answer: 95.75%
Financial report context:
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index for the five years ended september 27 , 2014 . the company has added the s&p information technology index to the graph to capture the stock performance of companies whose products and services relate to those of the company . the s&p information technology index replaces the s&p computer hardware index , which is no longer tracked by s&p . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index and the s&p information technology index as of the market close on september 25 , 2009 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2014 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . apple inc . | 2014 form 10-k | 23 * $ 100 invested on 9/25/09 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . september september september september september september .

Financial table:
september 2009: apple inc .; september 2010: $ 100; september 2011: $ 160; september 2012: $ 222; september 2013: $ 367; september 2014: $ 272; column_7: $ 407
september 2009: s&p 500 index; september 2010: $ 100; september 2011: $ 110; september 2012: $ 111; september 2013: $ 145; september 2014: $ 173; column_7: $ 207
september 2009: dow jones u.s . technology supersector index; september 2010: $ 100; september 2011: $ 112; september 2012: $ 115; september 2013: $ 150; september 2014: $ 158; column_7: $ 205
september 2009: s&p information technology index; september 2010: $ 100; september 2011: $ 111; september 2012: $ 115; september 2013: $ 152; september 2014: $ 163; column_7: $ 210

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage of cumulative total shareholder return for the five year period ended september 2014 between apple inc . and the s&p 500 index?
Answer: 200%
Financial report context:
leased real property in september 2002 , we completed a sale/leaseback transaction for our 200000 square foot headquarters and manufacturing facility located in bedford , massachusetts and our 62500 square foot lorad manufacturing facility in danbury , connecticut . the lease for these facilities , including the associated land , has a term of 20 years , with four-five year renewal options . we sublease approximately 10000 square feet of the bedford facility to a subtenant , cmp media , under a lease which expires in may 2006 . we also sublease approximately 11000 square feet of the bedford facility to a subtenant , genesys conferencing , under a lease which expires in february we lease a 60000 square feet of office and manufacturing space in danbury , connecticut near our lorad manufacturing facility . this lease expires in december 2012 . we also lease a sales and service office in belgium . item 3 . legal proceedings . in march 2005 , we were served with a complaint filed on november 12 , 2004 by oleg sokolov with the united states district court for the district of connecticut alleging that our htc 2122 grid infringes u.s . patent number 5970118 . the plaintiff is seeking to preliminarily and permanently enjoin us from infringing the patent , as well as damages resulting from the alleged infringement , treble damages and reasonable attorney fees , and such other and further relief as may be available . on april 25 , 2005 , we filed an answer and counterclaims in response to the complaint in which we denied the plaintiff 2019s allegations and , among other things , sought declaratory relief with respect to the patent claims and damages , as well as other relief . on october 28 , 1998 , the plaintiff had previously sued lorad , asserting , among other things , that lorad had misappropriated the plaintiff 2019s trade secrets relating to the htc grid . this previous case was dismissed on august 28 , 2000 . the dismissal was affirmed by the appellate court of the state of connecticut , and the united states supreme court refused to grant certiorari . we do not believe that we infringe any valid or enforceable patents of the plaintiff . however , while we intend to vigorously defend our interests , ongoing litigation can be costly and time consuming , and we cannot guarantee that we will prevail . item 4 . submission of matters to a vote of security holders . at a special meeting of stockholders held november 15 , 2005 , our stockholders approved a proposal to amend our certificate of incorporation to increase the number of shares of common stock the company has authority to issue from 30 million to 90 million . the voting results for the proposal , not adjusted for the effect of the stock split , were as follows: .

Financial table:
for: 17695228; against: 963202; abstained: 155213; broker non-votes: 0

Additional report context:
as a result of the amendment , the previously announced two-for-one stock split to be effected as a stock dividend , was paid on november 30 , 2005 to stockholders of record on november 16 , 2005. .

Question: what portion of the votes support the proposal?
Answer: 94.1%
Financial report context:
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

Financial table:
2009: masco; 2010: $ 128.21; 2011: $ 120.32; 2012: $ 102.45; 2013: $ 165.80; column_6: $ 229.59
2009: s&p 500 index; 2010: $ 125.92; 2011: $ 144.58; 2012: $ 147.60; 2013: $ 171.04; column_6: $ 225.85
2009: s&p industrials index; 2010: $ 120.19; 2011: $ 151.89; 2012: $ 150.97; 2013: $ 173.87; column_6: $ 243.73
2009: s&p consumer durables & apparel index; 2010: $ 136.29; 2011: $ 177.91; 2012: $ 191.64; 2013: $ 232.84; column_6: $ 316.28

Additional report context:
in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: what was the percent of the increase in the performance of s&p 500 index from 2009 to 2010
Answer: 14.82%
Financial report context:
2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied waste industries , inc . and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic services , inc . prior to such date . at december 31 , 2010 , there were approximately 15.3 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one-year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 were $ 5.28 , $ 3.79 and $ 4.36 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

Financial table:
2010: expected volatility; 2009: 28.6% ( 28.6 % ); 2008: 28.7% ( 28.7 % ); column_4: 27.3% ( 27.3 % )
2010: risk-free interest rate; 2009: 2.4% ( 2.4 % ); 2008: 1.4% ( 1.4 % ); column_4: 1.7% ( 1.7 % )
2010: dividend yield; 2009: 2.9% ( 2.9 % ); 2008: 3.1% ( 3.1 % ); column_4: 2.9% ( 2.9 % )
2010: expected life ( in years ); 2009: 4.3; 2008: 4.2; column_4: 4.2
2010: contractual life ( in years ); 2009: 7; 2008: 7; column_4: 7
2010: expected forfeiture rate; 2009: 3.0% ( 3.0 % ); 2008: 3.0% ( 3.0 % ); column_4: 3.0% ( 3.0 % )

Additional report context:
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements , continued .

Question: what was the percentage growth in the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted from 2009 to 2010
Answer: 39.3%
Financial report context:
condition are valued using a monte carlo model . expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years . the expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year u.s . treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date . the following table provides the weighted average assumptions used in the monte carlo simulation and the weighted average grant date fair values of psus granted for the years ended december 31: .

Financial table:
2018: expected volatility; 2017: 17.23% ( 17.23 % ); 2016: 17.40% ( 17.40 % ); column_4: 15.90% ( 15.90 % )
2018: risk-free interest rate; 2017: 2.36% ( 2.36 % ); 2016: 1.53% ( 1.53 % ); column_4: 0.91% ( 0.91 % )
2018: expected life ( years ); 2017: 3.0; 2016: 3.0; column_4: 3.0
2018: grant date fair value per share; 2017: $ 73.62; 2016: $ 72.81; column_4: $ 77.16

Additional report context:
the grant date fair value of psus that vest ratably and have market and/or performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method . if dividends are paid with respect to shares of the company 2019s common stock before the rsus and psus are distributed , the company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the rsus and psus were shares of company common stock . when the rsus and psus are distributed , the company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued . the company accrued dividend equivalents totaling $ 1 million , less than $ 1 million and $ 1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying consolidated statements of changes in shareholders 2019 equity for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . employee stock purchase plan the company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan ( the 201cespp 201d ) through which employee participants may use payroll deductions to acquire company common stock at a discount . prior to february 5 , 2019 , the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp was the lesser of 90% ( 90 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three -month purchase period . on july 27 , 2018 , the espp was amended , effective february 5 , 2019 , to permit employee participants to acquire company common stock at 85% ( 85 % ) of the fair market value of the common stock at the end of the purchase period . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 1.9 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the espp . the espp is considered compensatory . during the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , the company issued 95 thousand , 93 thousand and 93 thousand shares , respectively , under the espp. .

Question: what was the purchase price of common stock acquired under the espp in 2018?
Answer: 66.26
Financial report context:
part i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy employment litigation ( entergy corporation , entergy arkansas , entergy gulf states , entergy louisiana , entergy mississippi , entergy new orleans , and system energy ) entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are defendants in numerous lawsuits that have been filed by former employees alleging that they were wrongfully terminated and/or discriminated against on the basis of age , race , sex , and/or other protected characteristics . entergy corporation and the domestic utility companies are vigorously defending these suits and deny any liability to the plaintiffs . however , no assurance can be given as to the outcome of these cases , and at this time management cannot estimate the total amount of damages sought . included in the employment litigation are two cases filed in state court in claiborne county , mississippi in december 2002 . the two cases were filed by former employees of entergy operations who were based at grand gulf . entergy operations and entergy employees are named as defendants . the cases make employment-related claims , and seek in total $ 53 million in alleged actual damages and $ 168 million in punitive damages . entergy subsequently removed both proceedings to the federal district in jackson , mississippi . entergy cannot predict the ultimate outcome of this proceeding . research spending entergy is a member of the electric power research institute ( epri ) . epri conducts a broad range of research in major technical fields related to the electric utility industry . entergy participates in various epri projects based on entergy's needs and available resources . the domestic utility companies contributed $ 1.6 million in 2004 , $ 1.5 million in 2003 , and $ 2.1 million in 2002 to epri . the non-utility nuclear business contributed $ 3.2 million in 2004 and $ 3 million in both 2003 and 2002 to epri . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2004 , entergy employed 14425 people . u.s . utility: .

Financial table:
entergy arkansas: entergy gulf states; 1494: 1641
entergy arkansas: entergy louisiana; 1494: 943
entergy arkansas: entergy mississippi; 1494: 793
entergy arkansas: entergy new orleans; 1494: 403
entergy arkansas: system energy; 1494: -
entergy arkansas: entergy operations; 1494: 2735
entergy arkansas: entergy services; 1494: 2704
entergy arkansas: entergy nuclear operations; 1494: 3245
entergy arkansas: other subsidiaries; 1494: 277
entergy arkansas: total full-time; 1494: 14235
entergy arkansas: part-time; 1494: 190
entergy arkansas: total entergy; 1494: 14425

Additional report context:
approximately 4900 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , and the international brotherhood of teamsters union. .

Question: what percent of total full-time employees are in entergy nuclear operations?
Answer: 23%
Financial report context:
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .

Financial table:
floating rate due december 15 2015: floating rate due december 15 2016; $ 500: 350
floating rate due december 15 2015: 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 ); $ 500: 650
floating rate due december 15 2015: 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018; $ 500: 750
floating rate due december 15 2015: discount and issuance costs; $ 500: -2 ( 2 )
floating rate due december 15 2015: net proceeds; $ 500: $ 2248

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .

Question: debt in december 2013 , what was the percent of the net of discounts and issuance costs associated with the issuance fixed and floating rate senior notes in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition
Answer: 2.3%
Financial report context:
the company 2019s stock performance the following graph compares cumulative total return of the company 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the nasdaq stock market-united states , and ( ii ) the nasdaq biotechnology index . the graph assumes ( a ) $ 100 was invested on july 31 , 2001 in each of the company 2019s common stock , the stocks comprising the nasdaq stock market-united states and the stocks comprising the nasdaq biotechnology index , and ( b ) the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 65 month cumulative total return* among alexion pharmaceuticals , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq biotechnology index alexion pharmaceuticals , inc . nasdaq composite nasdaq biotechnology .

Financial table:
7/02: alexion pharmaceuticals inc .; 7/03: 100.00; 7/04: 108.38; 7/05: 102.64; 12/05: 167.89; 12/06: 130.56; 12/07: 260.41; column_8: 483.75
7/02: nasdaq composite; 7/03: 100.00; 7/04: 128.98; 7/05: 142.51; 12/05: 164.85; 12/06: 168.24; 12/07: 187.43; column_8: 204.78
7/02: nasdaq biotechnology; 7/03: 100.00; 7/04: 149.29; 7/05: 146.51; 12/05: 176.75; 12/06: 186.10; 12/07: 183.89; column_8: 187.04

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the percent change in the investment into alexion pharmaceuticals between 7/02 and 7/03?
Answer: 8.4%