alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements 236 jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report the table below sets forth the accretable yield activity for the firm 2019s pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): balance january 1; year ended december 31 , 2010: $ 25544; year ended december 31 , 2009: $ 32619; 2008: $ 2014
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): washington mutual acquisition; year ended december 31 , 2010: 2014; year ended december 31 , 2009: 2014; 2008: 39454
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): accretion into interest income; year ended december 31 , 2010: -3232 ( 3232 ); year ended december 31 , 2009: -4363 ( 4363 ); 2008: -1292 ( 1292 )
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): changes in interest rates on variable rate loans; year ended december 31 , 2010: -819 ( 819 ); year ended december 31 , 2009: -4849 ( 4849 ); 2008: -5543 ( 5543 )
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): other changes in expected cash flows ( a ); year ended december 31 , 2010: -2396 ( 2396 ); year ended december 31 , 2009: 2137; 2008: 2014
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): balance december 31; year ended december 31 , 2010: $ 19097; year ended december 31 , 2009: $ 25544; 2008: $ 32619
year ended december 31 , ( in millions except ratios ): accretable yield percentage; year ended december 31 , 2010: 4.35% ( 4.35 % ); year ended december 31 , 2009: 5.14% ( 5.14 % ); 2008: 5.81% ( 5.81 % )

Additional report context:
( a ) other changes in expected cash flows may vary from period to period as the firm continues to refine its cash flow model and periodically updates model assumptions . for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , other changes in expected cash flows were principally driven by changes in prepayment assumptions , as well as reclassification to the nonaccretable difference . such changes are expected to have an insignificant impact on the accretable yield percentage . the factors that most significantly affect estimates of gross cash flows expected to be collected , and accordingly the accretable yield balance , include : ( i ) changes in the benchmark interest rate indices for variable rate products such as option arm and home equity loans ; and ( ii ) changes in prepayment assump- tions . to date , the decrease in the accretable yield percentage has been primarily related to a decrease in interest rates on vari- able-rate loans and , to a lesser extent , extended loan liquida- tion periods . certain events , such as extended loan liquidation periods , affect the timing of expected cash flows but not the amount of cash expected to be received ( i.e. , the accretable yield balance ) . extended loan liquidation periods reduce the accretable yield percentage because the same accretable yield balance is recognized against a higher-than-expected loan balance over a longer-than-expected period of time. .

Question: what was the average balance of total pci consumer loans for the years ended december 31 , 2010 and 2009?
Answer: 22321
Financial report context:
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

Financial table:
december 31 2006: 2007; january 18 2007 refinancing: $ 61661; column_3: $ 96161
december 31 2006: 2008; january 18 2007 refinancing: 257541; column_3: 282041
december 31 2006: 2009; january 18 2007 refinancing: 68129; column_3: 145129
december 31 2006: 2010; january 18 2007 refinancing: 33586; column_3: 215586
december 31 2006: 2011; january 18 2007 refinancing: 941875; column_3: 165455
december 31 2006: thereafter; january 18 2007 refinancing: 1646709; column_3: 2105129
december 31 2006: total; january 18 2007 refinancing: $ 3009501; column_3: $ 3009501

Additional report context:
fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what was the change , in thousands , of principal maturities due in 2008 after the the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007?
Answer: -24500
Financial report context:
changes in our performance retention awards during 2009 were as follows : shares ( thous. ) weighted-average grant-date fair value .

Financial table:
shares ( thous. ): nonvested at january 1 2009; weighted-averagegrant-date fair value: 873; column_3: $ 50.70
shares ( thous. ): granted; weighted-averagegrant-date fair value: 449; column_3: 47.28
shares ( thous. ): vested; weighted-averagegrant-date fair value: -240 ( 240 ); column_3: 43.23
shares ( thous. ): forfeited; weighted-averagegrant-date fair value: -22 ( 22 ); column_3: 53.86
shares ( thous. ): nonvested at december 31 2009; weighted-averagegrant-date fair value: 1060; column_3: $ 50.88

Additional report context:
at december 31 , 2009 , there was $ 22 million of total unrecognized compensation expense related to nonvested performance retention awards , which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.3 years . a portion of this expense is subject to achievement of the roic levels established for the performance stock unit grants . 5 . retirement plans pension and other postretirement benefits pension plans 2013 we provide defined benefit retirement income to eligible non-union employees through qualified and non-qualified ( supplemental ) pension plans . qualified and non-qualified pension benefits are based on years of service and the highest compensation during the latest years of employment , with specific reductions made for early retirements . other postretirement benefits ( opeb ) 2013 we provide defined contribution medical and life insurance benefits for eligible retirees . these benefits are funded as medical claims and life insurance premiums are plan amendment effective january 1 , 2010 , medicare-eligible retirees who are enrolled in the union pacific retiree medical program will receive a contribution to a health reimbursement account , which can be used to pay eligible out-of-pocket medical expenses . the impact of the plan amendment is reflected in the projected benefit obligation ( pbo ) at december 31 , 2009 . funded status we are required by gaap to separately recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of our pension and opeb plans as an asset or liability . the funded status represents the difference between the pbo and the fair value of the plan assets . the pbo is the present value of benefits earned to date by plan participants , including the effect of assumed future salary increases . the pbo of the opeb plan is equal to the accumulated benefit obligation , as the present value of the opeb liabilities is not affected by salary increases . plan assets are measured at fair value . we use a december 31 measurement date for plan assets and obligations for all our retirement plans. .

Question: what is the annual compensation expense for the remaining unvested performance retention awards?
Answer: 1692307
Financial report context:
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Financial table:
september 30 2007: apple inc .; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 74; september 30 2010: $ 121; september 30 2011: $ 185; september 30 2012: $ 248; column_7: $ 437
september 30 2007: s&p 500; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 78; september 30 2010: $ 73; september 30 2011: $ 80; september 30 2012: $ 81; column_7: $ 105
september 30 2007: s&p computer hardware; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 84; september 30 2010: $ 99; september 30 2011: $ 118; september 30 2012: $ 134; column_7: $ 214
september 30 2007: dow jones us technology; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 76; september 30 2010: $ 85; september 30 2011: $ 95; september 30 2012: $ 98; column_7: $ 127

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the cumulative total return on the s&p 500 between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
Answer: 5
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income decreased $ 7.7 million primarily due to a higher effective income tax rate , lower other income , and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , substantially offset by higher net revenue , lower depreciation and amortization expenses , and lower interest expense . 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 105.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , higher other income , and lower depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 1216.7
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 31.0
amount ( in millions ): ano decommissioning trust; column_2: 26.4
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: 13.1
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -15.9 ( 15.9 )
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -11.9 ( 11.9 )
amount ( in millions ): capacity acquisition recovery; column_2: -10.3 ( 10.3 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 3.2
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 1252.3

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a base rate increase effective july 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the rate case settlement . the ano decommissioning trust variance is primarily related to the deferral of investment gains from the ano 1 and 2 decommissioning trust in 2010 in accordance with regulatory treatment . the gains resulted in an increase in 2010 in interest and investment income and a corresponding increase in regulatory charges with no effect on net income. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue in 2011
Answer: 35.6
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis the miso deferral variance is primarily due to the deferral in 2014 of non-fuel miso-related charges , as approved by the lpsc and the mpsc . the deferral of non-fuel miso-related charges is partially offset in other operation and maintenance expenses . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the recovery of non-fuel miso-related charges . the waterford 3 replacement steam generator provision is due to a regulatory charge of approximately $ 32 million recorded in 2015 related to the uncertainty associated with the resolution of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator project . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the waterford 3 replacement steam generator prudence review proceeding . entergy wholesale commodities following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2015 to 2014 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2014 net revenue; column_2: $ 2224
amount ( in millions ): nuclear realized price changes; column_2: -310 ( 310 )
amount ( in millions ): vermont yankee shutdown in december 2014; column_2: -305 ( 305 )
amount ( in millions ): nuclear volume excluding vermont yankee effect; column_2: 20
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 37
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 1666

Additional report context:
as shown in the table above , net revenue for entergy wholesale commodities decreased by approximately $ 558 million in 2015 primarily due to : 2022 lower realized wholesale energy prices , primarily due to significantly higher northeast market power prices in 2014 , and lower capacity prices in 2015 ; and 2022 a decrease in net revenue as a result of vermont yankee ceasing power production in december 2014 . the decrease was partially offset by higher volume in the entergy wholesale commodities nuclear fleet , excluding vermont yankee , resulting from fewer refueling outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014 , partially offset by more unplanned outage days in 2015 as compared to 2014. .

Question: what percent of the decline in net revenue is attributed to the variance in nuclear realized price?
Answer: 55.6%
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 booking holdings nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2012; booking holdings inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; booking holdings inc .: 187.37; nasdaqcomposite index: 141.63; s&p 500index: 132.39; rdg internetcomposite: 163.02
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; booking holdings inc .: 183.79; nasdaqcomposite index: 162.09; s&p 500index: 150.51; rdg internetcomposite: 158.81
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; booking holdings inc .: 205.51; nasdaqcomposite index: 173.33; s&p 500index: 152.59; rdg internetcomposite: 224.05
measurement pointdecember 31: 2016; booking holdings inc .: 236.31; nasdaqcomposite index: 187.19; s&p 500index: 170.84; rdg internetcomposite: 235.33
measurement pointdecember 31: 2017; booking holdings inc .: 280.10; nasdaqcomposite index: 242.29; s&p 500index: 208.14; rdg internetcomposite: 338.52

Additional report context:
sales of unregistered securities between october 1 , 2017 and december 31 , 2017 , we issued 103343 shares of our common stock in connection with the conversion of $ 196.1 million principal amount of our 1.0% ( 1.0 % ) convertible senior notes due 2018 . the conversions were effected in accordance with the indenture , which provides that the principal amount of converted notes be paid in cash and the conversion premium be paid in cash and/or shares of common stock at our election . in each case , we chose to pay the conversion premium in shares of common stock ( fractional shares are paid in cash ) . the issuances of the shares were not registered under the securities act of 1933 , as amended ( the "act" ) pursuant to section 3 ( a ) ( 9 ) of the act. .

Question: what was the percentage change in booking holdings inc . for the five years ended 2017?
Answer: 180.10%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. .

Financial table:
2014: first quarter; high: $ 62.42; low: $ 54.10
2014: second quarter; high: 65.64; low: 56.23
2014: third quarter; high: 66.71; low: 61.87
2014: fourth quarter; high: 79.41; low: 57.96
2014: 2013; high: high; low: low
2014: first quarter; high: $ 38.02; low: $ 34.19
2014: second quarter; high: 42.52; low: 36.24
2014: third quarter; high: 48.09; low: 41.66
2014: fourth quarter; high: 57.92; low: 45.68

Additional report context:
as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .

Question: how high did the stock price reach in january to march 2013?
Answer: 38.02
Financial report context:
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

Financial table:
2012: state street corporation; 2013: $ 100; 2014: $ 159; 2015: $ 172; 2016: $ 148; 2017: $ 178; column_7: $ 227
2012: s&p 500 index; 2013: 100; 2014: 132; 2015: 151; 2016: 153; 2017: 171; column_7: 208
2012: s&p financial index; 2013: 100; 2014: 136; 2015: 156; 2016: 154; 2017: 189; column_7: 230
2012: kbw bank index; 2013: 100; 2014: 138; 2015: 151; 2016: 151; 2017: 195; column_7: 231

Additional report context:
.

Question: what percent returns did shareholders of state street corporation
Answer: 1.27