alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Financial table:
2002: net mw in operation at december 31; 2001: 3955; 2000: 3445; column_4: 2475
2002: generation in gwh for the year; 2001: 29953; 2000: 22614; column_4: 7171
2002: capacity factor for the year; 2001: 93% ( 93 % ); 2000: 93% ( 93 % ); column_4: 94% ( 94 % )

Additional report context:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: what is the percent change in earnings for non-utility nuclear from 2001 to 2002?
Answer: 57.0%
Financial report context:
repurchase of equity securities the following table provides information regarding our purchases of equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2008 : number of shares purchased average paid per share2 total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs .

Financial table:
total number of shares purchased: october 1-31; average price paid per share2: 29704; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs: $ 5.99; maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs: 2014; column_5: 2014
total number of shares purchased: november 1-30; average price paid per share2: 4468; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs: $ 3.24; maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs: 2014; column_5: 2014
total number of shares purchased: december 1-31; average price paid per share2: 12850; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs: $ 3.98; maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs: 2014; column_5: 2014
total number of shares purchased: total1; average price paid per share2: 47022; total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans or programs: $ 5.18; maximum number ofshares that may yet be purchased under the plans or programs: 2014; column_5: 2014

Additional report context:
total1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47022 $ 5.18 2014 2014 1 consists of restricted shares of our common stock withheld under the terms of grants under employee stock compensation plans to offset tax withholding obligations that occurred upon vesting and release of restricted shares during each month of the fourth quarter of 2008 ( the 201cwithheld shares 201d ) . 2 the average price per month of the withheld shares was calculated by dividing the aggregate value of the tax withholding obligations for each month by the aggregate number of shares of our common stock withheld each month. .

Question: what was the average price per share from november to december?
Answer: 3.61
Financial report context:
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

Financial table:
12/31/05: ball corporation; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 110.86; 12/31/08: $ 115.36; 12/31/09: $ 107.58; 12/31/10: $ 134.96; column_7: $ 178.93
12/31/05: dj containers & packaging index; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 112.09; 12/31/08: $ 119.63; 12/31/09: $ 75.00; 12/31/10: $ 105.34; column_7: $ 123.56
12/31/05: s&p 500 index; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 115.80; 12/31/08: $ 122.16; 12/31/09: $ 76.96; 12/31/10: $ 97.33; column_7: $ 111.99
12/31/05: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/06: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/07: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/08: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/09: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/10: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); column_7: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
12/31/05: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/06: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/07: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/08: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/09: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/10: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; column_7: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for ball corporation for the five year period ending 12/31/10?
Answer: 78.93%
Financial report context:
judgments the valuation of goodwill and other intangible assets depends on a number of factors , including estimates of future market growth and trends , forecasted revenue and costs , expected useful lives of the assets , appropriate discount rates and other variables . goodwill is allocated to reporting units , which are components of the business that are one level below operating segments . each of these reporting units is tested for impairment individually during the annual evaluation . there is no goodwill assigned to reporting units within the balance sheet management segment . the following table shows the amount of goodwill allocated to each of the reporting units in the trading and investing segment ( dollars in millions ) : .

Financial table:
reporting unit: u.s . brokerage; december 31 2011: $ 1751.2
reporting unit: capital markets; december 31 2011: 142.4
reporting unit: retail bank; december 31 2011: 40.6
reporting unit: total goodwill; december 31 2011: $ 1934.2

Additional report context:
in connection with our annual impairment test of goodwill , we concluded that the goodwill was not impaired as the fair value of the reporting units was in excess of the book value of those reporting units as of december 31 , 2011 . the fair value of the reporting units exceeded the book value of those reporting units by substantial amounts ( fair value as a percent of book value ranged from approximately 150% ( 150 % ) to 700% ( 700 % ) ) and therefore did not indicate a significant risk of goodwill impairment based on current projections and valuations . we also evaluate the remaining useful lives on intangible assets each reporting period to determine whether events and circumstances warrant a revision to the remaining period of amortization . effects if actual results differ if our estimates of fair value for the reporting units change due to changes in our business or other factors , we may determine that an impairment charge is necessary . estimates of fair value are determined based on a complex model using cash flows and company comparisons . if management 2019s estimates of future cash flows are inaccurate , the fair value determined could be inaccurate and impairment would not be recognized in a timely manner . intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives . if changes in the estimated underlying revenue occur , impairment or a change in the remaining life may need to be recognized. .

Question: what percentage of total goodwill is attributable to retail bank reporting unit as december 31 , 2011?
Answer: 2%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2008 and 2007. .

Financial table:
2008: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 42.72; low: $ 32.10
2008: quarter ended june 30; high: 46.10; low: 38.53
2008: quarter ended september 30; high: 43.43; low: 31.89
2008: quarter ended december 31; high: 37.28; low: 19.35
2008: 2007; high: high; low: low
2008: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 41.31; low: $ 36.63
2008: quarter ended june 30; high: 43.84; low: 37.64
2008: quarter ended september 30; high: 45.45; low: 36.34
2008: quarter ended december 31; high: 46.53; low: 40.08

Additional report context:
on february 13 , 2009 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 28.85 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 13 , 2009 , we had 397097677 outstanding shares of common stock and 499 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and term loan , and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility and term loan , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to our securitization transaction , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: on february 13 , 2009 what was the market capitalization
Answer: 11456267981.5
Financial report context:
part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Financial table:
12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .; 1/3/2015: $ 100.00; 1/2/2016: $ 135.18; 12/31/2016: $ 149.39; 12/30/2017: $ 181.05; 12/29/2018: $ 300.22; column_7: $ 311.13
12/28/2013: nasdaq composite; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 112.60; 12/31/2016: 113.64; 12/30/2017: 133.19; 12/29/2018: 172.11; column_7: 165.84
12/28/2013: s&p 500; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 110.28; 12/31/2016: 109.54; 12/30/2017: 129.05; 12/29/2018: 157.22; column_7: 150.33
12/28/2013: s&p 500 information technology; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 115.49; 12/31/2016: 121.08; 12/30/2017: 144.85; 12/29/2018: 201.10; column_7: 200.52

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the total return is $ 100000 are invested in s&p500 on january 1st , 2015 and sold at the end of 2016?
Answer: 1877
Financial report context:
the following performance graph shows the cumulative total return to a holder of the company 2019s common stock , assuming dividend reinvestment , compared with the cumulative total return , assuming dividend reinvestment , of the standard & poor ( "s&p" ) 500 index and the dow jones us financials index during the period from december 31 , 2009 through december 31 , 2014. .

Financial table:
12/09: e*trade financial corporation; 12/10: 100.00; 12/11: 90.91; 12/12: 45.23; 12/13: 50.85; 12/14: 111.59; column_7: 137.81
12/09: s&p 500 index; 12/10: 100.00; 12/11: 115.06; 12/12: 117.49; 12/13: 136.30; 12/14: 180.44; column_7: 205.14
12/09: dow jones us financials index; 12/10: 100.00; 12/11: 112.72; 12/12: 98.24; 12/13: 124.62; 12/14: 167.26; column_7: 191.67

Additional report context:
table of contents .

Question: what was the difference in total return percentage beteween e*trade financial corporation and the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 12/14?
Answer: -67.33%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2014 annual report 63 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced u.s . equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 85 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2009 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2009: $ 100.00; 2010: $ 102.30; 2011: $ 81.87; 2012: $ 111.49; 2013: $ 152.42; 2014: $ 167.48
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2009: 100.00; 2010: 123.36; 2011: 94.75; 2012: 125.91; 2013: 173.45; 2014: 189.69
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2009: 100.00; 2010: 112.13; 2011: 93.00; 2012: 119.73; 2013: 162.34; 2014: 186.98
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2009: 100.00; 2010: 115.06; 2011: 117.48; 2012: 136.27; 2013: 180.39; 2014: 205.07

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the total return of the jpmorgan chase & co . stock over the above refernced five year period?
Answer: 67.48%
Financial report context:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Financial table:
2010: loews common stock; 2011: 100.0; 2012: 97.37; 2013: 106.04; 2014: 126.23; 2015: 110.59; column_7: 101.72
2010: s&p 500 index; 2011: 100.0; 2012: 102.11; 2013: 118.45; 2014: 156.82; 2015: 178.29; column_7: 180.75
2010: loews peer group ( a ); 2011: 100.0; 2012: 101.59; 2013: 115.19; 2014: 145.12; 2015: 152.84; column_7: 144.70

Additional report context:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Question: what was the overall growth of the s&p 500 index from 2010 to 2015
Answer: 80.75%
Financial report context:
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

Financial table:
12/31/2011: lkq corporation; 12/31/2012: $ 100; 12/31/2013: $ 140; 12/31/2014: $ 219; 12/31/2015: $ 187; 12/31/2016: $ 197; column_7: $ 204
12/31/2011: s&p 500 index; 12/31/2012: $ 100; 12/31/2013: $ 113; 12/31/2014: $ 147; 12/31/2015: $ 164; 12/31/2016: $ 163; column_7: $ 178
12/31/2011: peer group; 12/31/2012: $ 100; 12/31/2013: $ 111; 12/31/2014: $ 140; 12/31/2015: $ 177; 12/31/2016: $ 188; column_7: $ 217

Additional report context:
this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative return for lkq corporation for the five years ended 12/31/2016?
Answer: 104%