alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

Financial table:
5/9/2013: q; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 110; 12/31/2015: $ 140; 12/31/2016: $ 163; column_6: $ 181
5/9/2013: peer group; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 116; 12/31/2015: $ 143; 12/31/2016: $ 151; column_6: $ 143
5/9/2013: s&p 500; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 114; 12/31/2015: $ 127; 12/31/2016: $ 126; column_6: $ 138

Additional report context:
item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Question: what is the return on investment for q if the investment is sold at the end of year 2014?
Answer: 40%
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 47.1 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 1362.2
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 161.5
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -3.2 ( 3.2 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 1520.5

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in base rates , as approved by the apsc . the new base rates were effective february 24 , 2016 and began billing with the first billing cycle of april 2016 . the increase includes an interim base rate adjustment surcharge , effective with the first billing cycle of april 2016 , to recover the incremental revenue requirement for the period february 24 , 2016 through march 31 , 2016 . a significant portion of the increase is related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase. .

Question: what was the average trailing two year net revenue amount in 2015?
Answer: 1391.4
Financial report context:
entergy new orleans , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 4.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , lower taxes other than income taxes , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , partially offset by lower net revenue . 2010 compared to 2009 net income remained relatively unchanged , increasing $ 0.6 million , primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 272.9
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: -16.9 ( 16.9 )
amount ( in millions ): net gas revenue; column_2: -9.1 ( 9.1 )
amount ( in millions ): gas cost recovery asset; column_2: -3.0 ( 3.0 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 5.4
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -2.3 ( 2.3 )
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 247.0

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to formula rate plan decreases effective october 2010 and october 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to milder weather in 2011 compared to 2010 . the gas cost recovery asset variance is primarily due to the recognition in 2010 of a $ 3 million gas operations regulatory asset associated with the settlement of entergy new orleans 2019s electric and gas formula rate plan case and the amortization of that asset . see note 2 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the formula rate plan settlement. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -9.5%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

Financial table:
2007: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 41.31; low: $ 36.63
2007: quarter ended june 30; high: 43.84; low: 37.64
2007: quarter ended september 30; high: 45.45; low: 36.34
2007: quarter ended december 31; high: 46.53; low: 40.08
2007: 2006; high: high; low: low
2007: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 32.68; low: $ 26.66
2007: quarter ended june 30; high: 35.75; low: 27.35
2007: quarter ended september 30; high: 36.92; low: 29.98
2007: quarter ended december 31; high: 38.74; low: 35.21

Additional report context:
on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what was the fair value of class a stockholders equity at february 29 , 2008?\\n .
Answer: 15212558400
Financial report context:
the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007: consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007; $ 177724: $ 668123
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007: less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007; $ 177724: -683200 ( 683200 )
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007: plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007; $ 177724: 710896
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007: adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007; $ 177724: $ 695819
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2007: non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2007; $ 177724: $ -48012 ( 48012 )

Additional report context:
.

Question: what portion of consolidated cashflow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2007 is related to tower cash flow twelve months?
Answer: 102.3%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph this performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of quintiles ims holdings , inc . under the exchange act or under the securities act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing . the following graph shows a comparison from may 9 , 2013 ( the date our common stock commenced trading on the nyse ) through december 31 , 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a select peer group . the peer group consists of cerner corporation , charles river laboratories , inc. , dun & bradstreet corporation , equifax inc. , icon plc , ihs markit ltd. , inc research holdings , laboratory corporation of america holdings , nielsen n.v. , parexel international corporation , inc. , pra health sciences , inc. , thomson reuters corporation and verisk analytics , inc . the companies in our peer group are publicly traded information services , information technology or contract research companies , and thus share similar business model characteristics to quintilesims , or provide services to similar customers as quintilesims . many of these companies are also used by our compensation committee for purposes of compensation benchmarking . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in quintilesims , the s&p 500 and the peer group as of the close of market on may 9 , 2013 , assumes the reinvestments of dividends , if any . the s&p 500 and our peer group are included for comparative purposes only . they do not necessarily reflect management 2019s opinion that the s&p 500 and our peer group are an appropriate measure of the relative performance of the stock involved , and they are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock . s&p 500 quintilesims peer group .

Financial table:
5/9/2013: q; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 110; 12/31/2015: $ 140; 12/31/2016: $ 163; column_6: $ 181
5/9/2013: peer group; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 116; 12/31/2015: $ 143; 12/31/2016: $ 151; column_6: $ 143
5/9/2013: s&p 500; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 114; 12/31/2015: $ 127; 12/31/2016: $ 126; column_6: $ 138

Additional report context:
item 6 . selected financial data we have derived the following consolidated statements of income data for 2016 , 2015 and 2014 and consolidated balance sheet data as of december 31 , 2016 and 2015 from our audited consolidated financial .

Question: in 2013 what was the anticipated percentage growth in the stock performance for the peer group in 2014
Answer: 43%
Financial report context:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: receivables from customers; december 31 , 2016: $ 10374; december 31 , 2015: $ 10435
in millions of dollars: receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2016: 18513; december 31 , 2015: 17248
in millions of dollars: total brokerage receivables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2016: $ 28887; december 31 , 2015: $ 27683
in millions of dollars: payables to customers; december 31 , 2016: $ 37237; december 31 , 2015: $ 35653
in millions of dollars: payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2016: 19915; december 31 , 2015: 18069
in millions of dollars: total brokerage payables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2016: $ 57152; december 31 , 2015: $ 53722

Additional report context:
payables to brokers , dealers , and clearing organizations 19915 18069 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 57152 $ 53722 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2015 what was the ratio of receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations to payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations?
Answer: .95
Financial report context:
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 1110.1
( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 26.7
( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: 13.0
( in millions ): summer capacity charges; column_2: 5.5
( in millions ): price applied to unbilled sales; column_2: 4.8
( in millions ): fuel recovery revenues; column_2: -14.2 ( 14.2 )
( in millions ): other; column_2: 3.9
( in millions ): 2004 net revenue; column_2: $ 1149.8

Additional report context:
the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 3.58%
Financial report context:
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2005 9 . shareholders 2019 equity ( continued ) stockholder received proceeds , net of the underwriting discount , of $ 20.69 per share . the company did not sell any shares in , or receive any proceeds from , the secondary offering . concurrent with the closing of the secondary offering on december 21 , 2005 , the company entered into a common stock repurchase agreement with pca holdings llc . pursuant to the repurchase agreement , the company purchased 4500000 shares of common stock directly from pca holdings llc at the initial price to the public net of the underwriting discount or $ 20.69 per share , the same net price per share received by pca holdings llc in the secondary offering . these shares were retired on december 21 , 2005 . 10 . commitments and contingencies capital commitments the company had authorized capital expenditures of approximately $ 33.1 million and $ 55.2 million as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , respectively , in connection with the expansion and replacement of existing facilities and equipment . operating leases pca leases space for certain of its facilities and cutting rights to approximately 108000 acres of timberland under long-term leases . the company also leases equipment , primarily vehicles and rolling stock , and other assets under long-term leases of a duration generally of three years . the minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases with lease terms in excess of one year are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
2006: 2007; $ 24569: 21086
2006: 2008; $ 24569: 14716
2006: 2009; $ 24569: 9801
2006: 2010; $ 24569: 6670
2006: thereafter; $ 24569: 37130
2006: total; $ 24569: $ 113972

Additional report context:
capital lease obligations were not significant to the accompanying financial statements . total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance , for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 35.8 million , $ 33.0 million and $ 31.6 million , respectively . these costs are included in cost of goods sold and selling and administrative expenses. .

Question: what was the percentage change in total lease expense , including base rent on all leases and executory costs , such as insurance , taxes , and maintenance from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 4%