alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
lkq corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 5 . long-term obligations ( continued ) as part of the consideration for business acquisitions completed during 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , we issued promissory notes totaling approximately $ 1.7 million , $ 7.2 million and $ 6.4 million , respectively . the notes bear interest at annual rates of 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) to 6.0% ( 6.0 % ) , and interest is payable at maturity or in monthly installments . we also assumed certain liabilities in connection with a business acquisition during the second quarter of 2005 , including a promissory note with a remaining principle balance of approximately $ 0.2 million . the annual interest rate on the note , which was retired during 2006 , was note 6 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2007 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 42335: 33249
2008: 2010; $ 42335: 25149
2008: 2011; $ 42335: 17425
2008: 2012; $ 42335: 11750
2008: thereafter; $ 42335: 28581
2008: future minimum lease payments; $ 42335: $ 158489

Additional report context:
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 27.4 million , $ 18.6 million and $ 12.2 million during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 and 2005 , respectively . we guaranty the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guaranties at december 31 , 2007 , the guarantied residual value would have totaled approximately $ 24.0 million . litigation and related contingencies on december 2 , 2005 , ford global technologies , llc ( 2018 2018ford 2019 2019 ) filed a complaint with the united states international trade commission ( 2018 2018usitc 2019 2019 ) against keystone and five other named respondents , including four taiwan-based manufacturers . on december 12 , 2005 , ford filed an amended complaint . both the complaint and the amended complaint contended that keystone and the other respondents infringed 14 design patents that ford alleges cover eight parts on the 2004-2005 .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: 52%
Financial report context:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 28 , 2007 through october 28 , 2012 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 28 , 2007 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * $ 100 invested on 10/28/07 in stock or 10/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
10/28/2007: applied materials; 10/26/2008: 100.00; 10/25/2009: 61.22; 10/31/2010: 71.06; 10/30/2011: 69.23; 10/28/2012: 72.37; column_7: 62.92
10/28/2007: s&p 500 index; 10/26/2008: 100.00; 10/25/2009: 63.90; 10/31/2010: 70.17; 10/30/2011: 81.76; 10/28/2012: 88.37; column_7: 101.81
10/28/2007: rdg semiconductor composite index; 10/26/2008: 100.00; 10/25/2009: 54.74; 10/31/2010: 68.59; 10/30/2011: 84.46; 10/28/2012: 91.33; column_7: 82.37

Additional report context:
dividends during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.07 per share . during fiscal 2010 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.07 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend in the amount of $ 0.06 . dividends declared during fiscal 2012 , 2011 and 2010 amounted to $ 438 million , $ 408 million and $ 361 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/28/07 10/26/08 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: how much did the quarterly dividend yield change from 2010 to 2012 for applied materials?
Answer: 0.04%
Financial report context:
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .

Financial table:
( square feet in thousands ): owned; united states: 4530; other countries: 2417; total: 6947
( square feet in thousands ): leased; united states: 1037; other countries: 1341; total: 2378
( square feet in thousands ): total; united states: 5567; other countries: 3758; total: 9325

Additional report context:
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what percentage of buildings are owned in the united states by the company?
Answer: 81.4%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following graph provides a comparison of five year cumulative total stockholder returns of teleflex common stock , the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) 500 stock index and the s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index . the annual changes for the five-year period shown on the graph are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in teleflex common stock and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested . market performance .

Financial table:
company / index: teleflex incorporated; 2009: 100; 2010: 102; 2011: 119; 2012: 142; 2013: 190; 2014: 235
company / index: s&p 500 index; 2009: 100; 2010: 115; 2011: 117; 2012: 136; 2013: 180; 2014: 205
company / index: s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index; 2009: 100; 2010: 97; 2011: 97; 2012: 113; 2013: 144; 2014: 182

Additional report context:
s&p 500 healthcare equipment & supply index 100 97 97 113 144 182 .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in teleflex incorporated from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 2%
Financial report context:
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2011 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 31 , 2016 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/31/1612/28/13 1/2/1612/31/11 1/3/1512/29/12 *$ 100 invested on 12/31/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2017 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
12/31/2011: cadence design systems inc .; 12/29/2012: 100.00; 12/28/2013: 129.23; 1/3/2015: 133.94; 1/2/2016: 181.06; 12/31/2016: 200.10; column_7: 242.50
12/31/2011: nasdaq composite; 12/29/2012: 100.00; 12/28/2013: 116.41; 1/3/2015: 165.47; 1/2/2016: 188.69; 12/31/2016: 200.32; column_7: 216.54
12/31/2011: s&p 400 information technology; 12/29/2012: 100.00; 12/28/2013: 118.41; 1/3/2015: 165.38; 1/2/2016: 170.50; 12/31/2016: 178.74; column_7: 219.65

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in cadence design systems from the end of the year in 2015 to the end of the year in 2016?
Answer: 10.5%
Financial report context:
during 2014 , $ 91 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 11 million of provision expense for 2013 . the charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2014 were $ 42 million compared to $ 104 million for 2013 . at december 31 , 2014 , the allowance for loan and lease losses was $ .9 billion on $ 4.4 billion of purchased impaired loans while the remaining $ .5 billion of purchased impaired loans required no allowance as the net present value of expected cash flows equaled or exceeded the recorded investment . as of december 31 , 2013 , the allowance for loan and lease losses related to purchased impaired loans was $ 1.0 billion . if any allowance for loan losses is recognized on a purchased impaired pool , which is accounted for as a single asset , the entire balance of that pool would be disclosed as requiring an allowance . subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded allowance for loan and lease losses , to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the allowance associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2014 and 2013 follows : table 72 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

Financial table:
in millions: january 1; 2014: $ 2055; 2013: $ 2166
in millions: accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ); 2014: -587 ( 587 ); 2013: -695 ( 695 )
in millions: net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ); 2014: 208; 2013: 613
in millions: disposals; 2014: -118 ( 118 ); 2013: -29 ( 29 )
in millions: december 31; 2014: $ 1558; 2013: $ 2055

Additional report context:
( a ) approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 were within the commercial portfolio as compared to 37% ( 37 % ) for year ended december 31 , 2013 . note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data is presented below . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 143 .

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 due to the commercial portfolio?
Answer: 193.44
Financial report context:
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2011 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

Financial table:
company/index: o 2019reilly automotive inc .; december 31 , 2011: $ 100; december 31 , 2012: $ 112; december 31 , 2013: $ 161; december 31 , 2014: $ 241; december 31 , 2015: $ 317; december 31 , 2016: $ 348
company/index: s&p 500 retail index; december 31 , 2011: 100; december 31 , 2012: 125; december 31 , 2013: 180; december 31 , 2014: 197; december 31 , 2015: 245; december 31 , 2016: 257
company/index: s&p 500; december 31 , 2011: $ 100; december 31 , 2012: $ 113; december 31 , 2013: $ 147; december 31 , 2014: $ 164; december 31 , 2015: $ 163; december 31 , 2016: $ 178

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the 2012 return on o 2019reilly automotive inc . stock?\\n
Answer: 12
Financial report context:
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2011 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2006 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/06 ) total return analysis .

Financial table:
12/31/2006: ball corporation; 12/31/2007: $ 100.00; 12/31/2008: $ 104.05; 12/31/2009: $ 97.04; 12/31/2010: $ 121.73; 12/31/2011: $ 161.39; column_7: $ 170.70
12/31/2006: dj us containers & packaging; 12/31/2007: $ 100.00; 12/31/2008: $ 106.73; 12/31/2009: $ 66.91; 12/31/2010: $ 93.98; 12/31/2011: $ 110.23; column_7: $ 110.39
12/31/2006: s&p 500; 12/31/2007: $ 100.00; 12/31/2008: $ 105.49; 12/31/2009: $ 66.46; 12/31/2010: $ 84.05; 12/31/2011: $ 96.71; column_7: $ 98.75

Additional report context:
copyright a9 2012 standard & poor fffds , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ) copyright a9 2012 dow jones & company . all rights reserved. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in ball corporation from 2006 to 2008?
Answer: 2.96%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 , 2011 , and 2012 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Financial table:
december 312008: disca; december 312009: $ 102.53; december 312010: $ 222.09; december 312011: $ 301.96; december 312012: $ 296.67; column_6: $ 459.67
december 312008: discb; december 312009: $ 78.53; december 312010: $ 162.82; december 312011: $ 225.95; december 312012: $ 217.56; column_6: $ 327.11
december 312008: disck; december 312009: $ 83.69; december 312010: $ 165.75; december 312011: $ 229.31; december 312012: $ 235.63; column_6: $ 365.63
december 312008: s&p 500; december 312009: $ 74.86; december 312010: $ 92.42; december 312011: $ 104.24; december 312012: $ 104.23; column_6: $ 118.21
december 312008: peer group; december 312009: $ 68.79; december 312010: $ 100.70; december 312011: $ 121.35; december 312012: $ 138.19; column_6: $ 190.58

Additional report context:
equity compensation plan information information regarding securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans will be set forth in our definitive proxy statement for our 2013 annual meeting of stockholders under the caption 201csecurities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans , 201d which is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca common stock from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2012?
Answer: 359.67%
Financial report context:
the following table illustrates the effect that a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable or favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates , relative to the u.s . dollar , would have on the fair value of our forward exchange contracts as of october 30 , 2010 and october 31 , 2009: .

Financial table:
october 30 2010: fair value of forward exchange contracts asset; october 31 2009: $ 7256; column_3: $ 8367
october 30 2010: fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset; october 31 2009: $ 22062; column_3: $ 20132
october 30 2010: fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability; october 31 2009: $ -7396 ( 7396 ); column_3: $ -6781 ( 6781 )

Additional report context:
fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22062 $ 20132 fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) favorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ ( 7396 ) $ ( 6781 ) the calculation assumes that each exchange rate would change in the same direction relative to the u.s . dollar . in addition to the direct effects of changes in exchange rates , such changes typically affect the volume of sales or the foreign currency sales price as competitors 2019 products become more or less attractive . our sensitivity analysis of the effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates does not factor in a potential change in sales levels or local currency selling prices. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the fair value of forward exchange contracts after a 10% ( 10 % ) unfavorable movement in foreign currency exchange rates asset from 2009 to 2010?
Answer: 9.6%
Financial report context:
as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through june 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , annual future minimum payments under these operating leases were as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
2007: 2008; 5320: 5335
2007: 2009; 5320: 5075
2007: 2010; 5320: 4659
2007: 2011; 5320: 4712
2007: 2012 and thereafter; 5320: 12798
2007: total; 5320: $ 37899

Additional report context:
rent expense , net of amortization of the deferred gain on sale of property , was $ 4723041 , $ 4737218 , and $ 1794234 for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 , respectively . 6 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock as of december 31 , 2006 , the company had 46857512 shares of common stock outstanding , of which 4814744 shares were sold to employees and consultants subject to restricted stock agreements . the restricted common shares vest in accordance with the provisions of the agreements , generally over five years . all unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the company at the original purchase price . as of december 31 , 2006 , 36000 shares of common stock were subject to repurchase . in addition , the company also issued 12000 shares for a restricted stock award to an employee under the company 2019s new 2005 stock and incentive plan based on service performance . these shares vest monthly over a three-year period . stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . the 2005 stock plan provides that an aggregate of up to 11542358 shares of the company 2019s common stock be reserved and available to be issued . in addition , the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what percentage of annual future minimum payments under operating leases are due in 2007?
Answer: 14%