alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
rates are still low and that a significant portion of cruise guests carried are first-time cruisers . we believe this presents an opportunity for long-term growth and a potential for increased profitability . the following table details industry market penetration rates for north america , europe and asia/pacific computed based on the number of annual cruise guests as a percentage of the total population : year north america ( 1 ) ( 2 ) europe ( 1 ) ( 3 ) asia/pacific ( 1 ) ( 4 ) .

Financial table:
year: 2012; north america ( 1 ) ( 2 ): 3.33% ( 3.33 % ); europe ( 1 ) ( 3 ): 1.21% ( 1.21 % ); asia/pacific ( 1 ) ( 4 ): 0.04% ( 0.04 % )
year: 2013; north america ( 1 ) ( 2 ): 3.32% ( 3.32 % ); europe ( 1 ) ( 3 ): 1.24% ( 1.24 % ); asia/pacific ( 1 ) ( 4 ): 0.05% ( 0.05 % )
year: 2014; north america ( 1 ) ( 2 ): 3.46% ( 3.46 % ); europe ( 1 ) ( 3 ): 1.23% ( 1.23 % ); asia/pacific ( 1 ) ( 4 ): 0.06% ( 0.06 % )
year: 2015; north america ( 1 ) ( 2 ): 3.36% ( 3.36 % ); europe ( 1 ) ( 3 ): 1.25% ( 1.25 % ); asia/pacific ( 1 ) ( 4 ): 0.08% ( 0.08 % )
year: 2016; north america ( 1 ) ( 2 ): 3.49% ( 3.49 % ); europe ( 1 ) ( 3 ): 1.24% ( 1.24 % ); asia/pacific ( 1 ) ( 4 ): 0.09% ( 0.09 % )

Additional report context:
( 1 ) source : our estimates are based on a combination of data obtained from publicly available sources including the international monetary fund , united nations , department of economic and social affairs , cruise lines international association ( "clia" ) and g.p . wild . ( 2 ) our estimates include the united states and canada . ( 3 ) our estimates include european countries relevant to the industry ( e.g. , nordics , germany , france , italy , spain and the united kingdom ) . ( 4 ) our estimates include the southeast asia ( e.g. , singapore , thailand and the philippines ) , east asia ( e.g. , china and japan ) , south asia ( e.g . india and pakistan ) and oceanian ( e.g. , australia and fiji islands ) regions . we estimate that the global cruise fleet was served by approximately 503000 berths on approximately 298 ships at the end of 2016 . there are approximately 60 ships with an estimated 173000 berths that are expected to be placed in service in the global cruise market between 2017 and 2021 , although it is also possible that additional ships could be ordered or taken out of service during these periods . we estimate that the global cruise industry carried 24.0 million cruise guests in 2016 compared to 23.0 million cruise guests carried in 2015 and 22.0 million cruise guests carried in .

Question: what was the anticipated percentage increase in the global cruise fleet berths from 2017 to 2021
Answer: 34.4%
Financial report context:
.

Financial table:
2009: state street corporation; 2010: $ 100; 2011: $ 107; 2012: $ 114; 2013: $ 101; 2014: $ 120; column_7: $ 190
2009: s&p 500 index; 2010: 100; 2011: 115; 2012: 132; 2013: 135; 2014: 157; column_7: 208
2009: s&p financial index; 2010: 100; 2011: 112; 2012: 126; 2013: 104; 2014: 135; column_7: 183
2009: kbw bank index; 2010: 100; 2011: 123; 2012: 152; 2013: 117; 2014: 153; column_7: 211

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in state street corporation from 20011 to 2012?
Answer: -11.4%
Financial report context:
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2008 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Financial table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2008; snap-onincorporated: $ 100.00; peer group ( 3 ): $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2009; snap-onincorporated: 111.40; peer group ( 3 ): 127.17; s&p 500: 126.46
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2010; snap-onincorporated: 153.24; peer group ( 3 ): 169.36; s&p 500: 145.51
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2011; snap-onincorporated: 140.40; peer group ( 3 ): 165.85; s&p 500: 148.59
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2012; snap-onincorporated: 223.82; peer group ( 3 ): 195.02; s&p 500: 172.37
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2013; snap-onincorporated: 315.72; peer group ( 3 ): 265.68; s&p 500: 228.19

Additional report context:
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . 24 snap-on incorporated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 .

Question: what is the return on investment if $ 100 are invested in s&p500 at the end of 2008 and sold at the end of 2010?
Answer: 45.51%
Financial report context:
the remaining change in other expense was driven primarily by changes on foreign currency exchange instruments as further discussed in note 7 in 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report . income taxes .

Financial table:
2018: current expense ( benefit ); 2017: $ -70 ( 70 ); column_3: $ 112
2018: deferred expense ( benefit ); 2017: 226; column_3: -97 ( 97 )
2018: total expense; 2017: $ 156; column_3: $ 15
2018: effective income tax rate; 2017: 17% ( 17 % ); column_3: 2% ( 2 % )

Additional report context:
for discussion on income taxes , see note 8 in 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report . discontinued operations discontinued operations net earnings increased primarily due to the gain on the sale of our aggregate ownership interests in enlink and the general partner of $ 2.6 billion ( $ 2.2 billion after-tax ) . for discussion on discontinued operations , see note 19 in 201citem 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 201d of this report 201d of this report . results of operations 2013 2017 vs . 2016 the graph below shows the change in net earnings from 2016 to 2017 . the material changes are further discussed by category on the following pages . to facilitate the review , these numbers are being presented before consideration of earnings attributable to noncontrolling interests . $ 1308 ( $ 165 ) ( $ 4 ) $ 1 $ 63 $ 400 ( $ 397 ) $ 126 $ 1204 ( $ 1458 ) $ 1078 2016 upstream operations marketing operations exploration expenses dd&a g&a financing costs , net other ( 1 ) income discontinued operations net earnings ( 1 ) other in the table above includes asset impairments , asset dispositions , restructuring and transaction costs and other expenses . the graph below presents the drivers of the upstream operations change presented above , with additional details and discussion of the drivers following the graph . ( $ 427 ) ( $ 427 ) $ 1395$ 1 395 $ 2176$ 2 176 $ 3484 2016 production volumes field prices hedging 2017 upstream operations expenses .

Question: what was the ratio in the total tax expense from 2018 to 2017
Answer: 10.4
Financial report context:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Financial table:
2004: loews common stock; 2005: 100.00; 2006: 135.92; 2007: 179.47; 2008: 219.01; 2009: 123.70; column_7: 160.62
2004: s&p 500 index; 2005: 100.00; 2006: 104.91; 2007: 121.48; 2008: 128.16; 2009: 80.74; column_7: 102.11
2004: loews peer group ( a ); 2005: 100.00; 2006: 133.59; 2007: 152.24; 2008: 174.46; 2009: 106.30; column_7: 136.35

Additional report context:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , cabot oil & gas corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco international incorporated , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p. , noble corporation , range resources corporation , spectra energy corporation ( included from december 14 , 2006 when it began trading ) , transocean , ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2009 and 2008 . we paid quarterly cash dividends on the former carolina group stock until the separation . regular dividends of $ 0.455 per share of the former carolina group stock were paid in the first and second quarters of 2008. .

Question: what was the growth rate of the loews common stock from december 31 , 2004 to 2009
Answer: 60.6%
Financial report context:
intangible asset amortization expense amounted to $ 12 million , $ 4 million and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . estimated amortization expense for the next five years subsequent to december 31 , 2018 is as follows: .

Financial table:
amount: 2019; column_2: $ 15
amount: 2020; column_2: 13
amount: 2021; column_2: 11
amount: 2022; column_2: 10
amount: 2023; column_2: 7

Additional report context:
note 9 : shareholders 2019 equity common stock under the dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan ( the 201cdrip 201d ) , shareholders may reinvest cash dividends and purchase additional company common stock , up to certain limits , through the plan administrator without commission fees . shares purchased by participants through the drip may be newly issued shares , treasury shares , or at the company 2019s election , shares purchased by the plan administrator in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions . purchases generally will be made and credited to drip accounts once each week . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately 4.2 million shares available for future issuance under the drip . anti-dilutive stock repurchase program in february 2015 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program , which allowed the company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time . the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 5.5 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program. .

Question: at what price per share did awk repurchase its shares of common stock in 2017?
Answer: 77.1
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments; 2009: $ 318063; 2008: $ 384102; 2007: $ 381415
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading assets 2013 derivative receivables; 2009: 110457; 2008: 121417; 2007: 65439
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ); 2009: $ 60224; 2008: $ 78841; 2007: $ 94737
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables; 2009: 77901; 2008: 93200; 2007: 65198

Additional report context:
( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .

Question: excluding derivatives , what are net 2008 trading assets , in millions?
Answer: 305261
Financial report context:
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2012: jkhy; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 138.34; 2015: 177.10; 2016: 195.72; 2017: 267.64; column_7: 322.60
2012: peer group; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 117.87; 2015: 161.90; 2016: 203.87; 2017: 233.39; column_7: 271.10
2012: s&p 500; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 120.60; 2015: 150.27; 2016: 161.43; 2017: 167.87; column_7: 197.92

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .

Question: jkhy's total 5 year return was what percent of the peer group?
Answer: 119%
Financial report context:
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 6.0 8.1 .

Financial table:
( square feet in millions ): owned facilities1; unitedstates: 30.7; othercountries: 17.2; total: 47.9
( square feet in millions ): leased facilities2; unitedstates: 2.1; othercountries: 6.0; total: 8.1
( square feet in millions ): total facilities; unitedstates: 32.8; othercountries: 23.2; total: 56.0

Additional report context:
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 . a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use . our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china . our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 . additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: what percentage of total facilities as measured in square feet are owned?
Answer: 86%
Financial report context:
the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2016 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our notes is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair value of our euro notes is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in a market that is not active , and therefore is classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 12 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Financial table:
2017: 2018; $ 200450: 168926
2017: 2019; $ 200450: 136462
2017: 2020; $ 200450: 110063
2017: 2021; $ 200450: 82494
2017: thereafter; $ 200450: 486199
2017: future minimum lease payments; $ 200450: $ 1184594

Additional report context:
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 26%