alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
apple inc . | 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Financial table:
september2011: apple inc .; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 166; september2014: $ 123; september2015: $ 183; september2016: $ 212; column_7: $ 213
september2011: s&p 500 index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 130; september2014: $ 155; september2015: $ 186; september2016: $ 185; column_7: $ 213
september2011: s&p information technology index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 132; september2014: $ 142; september2015: $ 183; september2016: $ 187; column_7: $ 230
september2011: dow jones u.s . technology supersector index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 130; september2014: $ 137; september2015: $ 178; september2016: $ 177; column_7: $ 217

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the 6 year return of the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index?
Answer: 117%
Financial report context:
.

Financial table:
years ended december 31: statutory tax rate; 2018: 19.0% ( 19.0 % ); 2017: 19.3% ( 19.3 % ); 2016: 20.0% ( 20.0 % )
years ended december 31: u.s . state income taxes net of u.s . federal benefit; 2018: -0.4 ( 0.4 ); 2017: -1.5 ( 1.5 ); 2016: 0.4
years ended december 31: taxes on international operations ( 1 ); 2018: -7.3 ( 7.3 ); 2017: -30.3 ( 30.3 ); 2016: -12.2 ( 12.2 )
years ended december 31: nondeductible expenses; 2018: 2.7; 2017: 3.4; 2016: 1.4
years ended december 31: adjustments to prior year tax requirements; 2018: 0.9; 2017: 2.0; 2016: -1.2 ( 1.2 )
years ended december 31: adjustments to valuation allowances; 2018: 3.8; 2017: -1.8 ( 1.8 ); 2016: -2.2 ( 2.2 )
years ended december 31: change in uncertain tax positions; 2018: 0.9; 2017: 1.6; 2016: 3.2
years ended december 31: excess tax benefits related to shared based compensation ( 2 ); 2018: -3.6 ( 3.6 ); 2017: -8.0 ( 8.0 ); 2016: 2014
years ended december 31: u.s . tax reform impact ( 3 ); 2018: 7.1; 2017: 51.2; 2016: 2014
years ended december 31: loss on disposition; 2018: -10.2 ( 10.2 ); 2017: 2014; 2016: 2014
years ended december 31: other 2014 net; 2018: -1.2 ( 1.2 ); 2017: 0.6; 2016: 1.2
years ended december 31: effective tax rate; 2018: 11.7% ( 11.7 % ); 2017: 36.5% ( 36.5 % ); 2016: 10.6% ( 10.6 % )

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the company determines the adjustment for taxes on international operations based on the difference between the statutory tax rate applicable to earnings in each foreign jurisdiction and the enacted rate of 19.0% ( 19.0 % ) , 19.3% ( 19.3 % ) and 20.0% ( 20.0 % ) at december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . the benefit to the company 2019s effective income tax rate from taxes on international operations relates to benefits from lower-taxed global operations , primarily due to the use of global funding structures and the tax holiday in singapore . the impact decreased from 2017 to 2018 primarily as a result of the decrease in the u.s . federal tax ( 2 ) with the adoption of asu 2016-09 in 2017 , excess tax benefits and deficiencies from share-based payment transactions are recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the company 2019s consolidated statements of income . ( 3 ) the impact of the tax reform act including the transition tax , the re-measurement of u.s . deferred tax assets and liabilities from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) , withholding tax accruals , and the allocation of tax benefit between continuing operations and discontinued operations related to utilization of foreign tax credits. .

Question: what is the difference between the statutory tax rate and the effective tax rate for international operations in 2018?
Answer: -7.3
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements at december 31 , 2007 , future minimum rental payments required under operating leases for continuing operations that have initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year , net of sublease rental income , most of which pertain to real estate leases , are as follows : ( millions ) .

Financial table:
2008: 2009; $ 317: 275
2008: 2010; $ 317: 236
2008: 2011; $ 317: 214
2008: 2012; $ 317: 191
2008: later years; $ 317: 597
2008: total minimum payments required; $ 317: $ 1830

Additional report context:
aon corporation .

Question: what is the decrease observed in the future minimum rental payments during 2008 and 2009?
Answer: -42
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

Financial table:
12/31/2009: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/2010: $ 100.00; 12/31/2011: $ 130.29; 12/31/2012: $ 135.35; 12/31/2013: $ 140.54; 12/31/2014: $ 205.95; column_7: $ 223.79
12/31/2009: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/2010: $ 100.00; 12/31/2011: $ 115.06; 12/31/2012: $ 117.48; 12/31/2013: $ 136.26; 12/31/2014: $ 180.38; column_7: $ 205.05
12/31/2009: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/2010: $ 100.00; 12/31/2011: $ 126.74; 12/31/2012: $ 126.75; 12/31/2013: $ 136.24; 12/31/2014: $ 192.61; column_7: $ 240.91

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for united parcel service inc . compared to the standard & poor's 500 index for the five years ended 12/31/2014?
Answer: 18.74%
Financial report context:
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 293.9
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 39.0
amount ( in millions ): net gas revenue; column_2: -2.5 ( 2.5 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -5.1 ( 5.1 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -8.1 ( 8.1 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 317.2

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2016 for entergy new orleans , inc?
Answer: 7.9%
Financial report context:
table of contents item 2 . properties flight equipment and fleet renewal as of december 31 , 2016 , american operated a mainline fleet of 930 aircraft . in 2016 , we continued our extensive fleet renewal program , which has provided us with the youngest fleet of the major u.s . network carriers . during 2016 , american took delivery of 55 new mainline aircraft and retired 71 aircraft . we are supported by our wholly-owned and third-party regional carriers that fly under capacity purchase agreements operating as american eagle . as of december 31 , 2016 , american eagle operated 606 regional aircraft . during 2016 , we increased our regional fleet by 61 regional aircraft , we removed and placed in temporary storage one embraer erj 140 aircraft and retired 41 other regional aircraft . mainline as of december 31 , 2016 , american 2019s mainline fleet consisted of the following aircraft : average seating capacity average ( years ) owned leased total .

Financial table:
average seating capacity: airbus a319; average age ( years ): 128; owned: 12.8; leased: 19; total: 106; column_6: 125
average seating capacity: airbus a320; average age ( years ): 150; owned: 15.5; leased: 10; total: 41; column_6: 51
average seating capacity: airbus a321; average age ( years ): 178; owned: 4.9; leased: 153; total: 46; column_6: 199
average seating capacity: airbusa330-200; average age ( years ): 258; owned: 5.0; leased: 15; total: 2014; column_6: 15
average seating capacity: airbusa330-300; average age ( years ): 291; owned: 16.4; leased: 4; total: 5; column_6: 9
average seating capacity: boeing737-800; average age ( years ): 160; owned: 7.7; leased: 123; total: 161; column_6: 284
average seating capacity: boeing757-200; average age ( years ): 179; owned: 17.9; leased: 39; total: 12; column_6: 51
average seating capacity: boeing767-300er; average age ( years ): 211; owned: 19.5; leased: 28; total: 3; column_6: 31
average seating capacity: boeing777-200er; average age ( years ): 263; owned: 16.0; leased: 44; total: 3; column_6: 47
average seating capacity: boeing777-300er; average age ( years ): 310; owned: 2.8; leased: 18; total: 2; column_6: 20
average seating capacity: boeing787-8; average age ( years ): 226; owned: 1.3; leased: 17; total: 2014; column_6: 17
average seating capacity: boeing787-9; average age ( years ): 285; owned: 0.2; leased: 4; total: 2014; column_6: 4
average seating capacity: embraer 190; average age ( years ): 99; owned: 9.2; leased: 20; total: 2014; column_6: 20
average seating capacity: mcdonnell douglasmd-80; average age ( years ): 140; owned: 22.0; leased: 25; total: 32; column_6: 57
average seating capacity: total; average age ( years ): 10.3; owned: 519; leased: 411; total: 930

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the average passenger capacity for the airbus planes in american's fleet?
Answer: 201
Financial report context:
through the certegy merger , the company has an obligation to service $ 200 million ( aggregate principal amount ) of unsecured 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) fixed-rate notes due in 2008 . the notes were recorded in purchase accounting at a discount of $ 5.7 million , which is being amortized over the term of the notes . the notes accrue interest at a rate of 4.75% ( 4.75 % ) per year , payable semi-annually in arrears on each march 15 and september 15 . on april 11 , 2005 , fis entered into interest rate swap agreements which have effectively fixed the interest rate at approximately 5.4% ( 5.4 % ) through april 2008 on $ 350 million of the term loan facilities ( or its replacement debt ) and at approximately 5.2% ( 5.2 % ) through april 2007 on an additional $ 350 million of the term loan . the company has designated these interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges in accordance with sfas no . 133 . the estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges results in an asset to the company of $ 4.9 million and $ 5.2 million , as of december 31 , 2006 and december 31 , 2005 , respectively , which is included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets in other noncurrent assets and as a component of accumulated other comprehensive earnings , net of deferred taxes . a portion of the amount included in accumulated other comprehensive earnings is reclassified into interest expense as a yield adjustment as interest payments are made on the term loan facilities . the company 2019s existing cash flow hedges are highly effective and there is no current impact on earnings due to hedge ineffectiveness . it is the policy of the company to execute such instruments with credit-worthy banks and not to enter into derivative financial instruments for speculative purposes . principal maturities at december 31 , 2006 ( and at december 31 , 2006 after giving effect to the debt refinancing completed on january 18 , 2007 ) for the next five years and thereafter are as follows ( in thousands ) : december 31 , january 18 , 2007 refinancing .

Financial table:
december 31 2006: 2007; january 18 2007 refinancing: $ 61661; column_3: $ 96161
december 31 2006: 2008; january 18 2007 refinancing: 257541; column_3: 282041
december 31 2006: 2009; january 18 2007 refinancing: 68129; column_3: 145129
december 31 2006: 2010; january 18 2007 refinancing: 33586; column_3: 215586
december 31 2006: 2011; january 18 2007 refinancing: 941875; column_3: 165455
december 31 2006: thereafter; january 18 2007 refinancing: 1646709; column_3: 2105129
december 31 2006: total; january 18 2007 refinancing: $ 3009501; column_3: $ 3009501

Additional report context:
fidelity national information services , inc . and subsidiaries and affiliates consolidated and combined financial statements notes to consolidated and combined financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what is the percentage change in estimated fair value of the cash flow hedges from 2005 to 2006?
Answer: -5.8%
Financial report context:
nbcuniversal media , llc consolidated statement of comprehensive income .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): net income; 2015: $ 3624; 2014: $ 3297; 2013: $ 2122
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): deferred gains ( losses ) on cash flow hedges net; 2015: -21 ( 21 ); 2014: 25; 2013: -5 ( 5 )
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): employee benefit obligations net; 2015: 60; 2014: -106 ( 106 ); 2013: 95
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): currency translation adjustments net; 2015: -121 ( 121 ); 2014: -62 ( 62 ); 2013: -41 ( 41 )
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): comprehensive income; 2015: 3542; 2014: 3154; 2013: 2171
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): net ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests; 2015: -210 ( 210 ); 2014: -182 ( 182 ); 2013: -154 ( 154 )
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): other comprehensive ( income ) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests; 2015: 29; 2014: 2014; 2013: 2014
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal; 2015: $ 3361; 2014: $ 2972; 2013: $ 2017

Additional report context:
see accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements . 147 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: what is the percentage change in comprehensive income attributable to nbcuniversal from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 13%
Financial report context:
18 2015 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2015 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2010: jkhy; 2011: 100.00; 2012: 127.44; 2013: 148.62; 2014: 205.60; 2015: 263.21; column_7: 290.88
2010: peer group; 2011: 100.00; 2012: 136.78; 2013: 148.10; 2014: 174.79; 2015: 239.10; column_7: 301.34
2010: s&p 500; 2011: 100.00; 2012: 130.69; 2013: 137.81; 2014: 166.20; 2015: 207.10; column_7: 222.47

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2010 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , heartland payment systems , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . micros systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it was acquired in september 2014. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the 5 year annual performance of the peer group stock from 2010 to 2011
Answer: 8.3%
Financial report context:
as of december 31 , 2017 , the aggregate future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases consist of the following ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31 .

Financial table:
2018: 2019; $ 9127: 8336
2018: 2020; $ 9127: 8350
2018: 2021; $ 9127: 7741
2018: 2022; $ 9127: 7577
2018: thereafter; $ 9127: 9873
2018: total minimum future lease payments; $ 9127: $ 51004

Additional report context:
rent expense for all operating leases amounted to $ 9.4 million , $ 8.1 million and $ 5.4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 , respectively . financing obligation 2014build-to-suit lease in august 2012 , we executed a lease for a building then under construction in santa clara , california to serve as our headquarters . the lease term is 120 months and commenced in august 2013 . based on the terms of the lease agreement and due to our involvement in certain aspects of the construction , we were deemed the owner of the building ( for accounting purposes only ) during the construction period . upon completion of construction in 2013 , we concluded that we had forms of continued economic involvement in the facility , and therefore did not meet with the provisions for sale-leaseback accounting . we continue to maintain involvement in the property post construction and lack transferability of the risks and rewards of ownership , due to our required maintenance of a $ 4.0 million letter of credit , in addition to our ability and option to sublease our portion of the leased building for fees substantially higher than our base rate . therefore , the lease is accounted for as a financing obligation and lease payments will be attributed to ( 1 ) a reduction of the principal financing obligation ; ( 2 ) imputed interest expense ; and ( 3 ) land lease expense , representing an imputed cost to lease the underlying land of the building . at the conclusion of the initial lease term , we will de-recognize both the net book values of the asset and the remaining financing obligation . as of december 31 , 2017 and 2016 , we have recorded assets of $ 53.4 million , representing the total costs of the building and improvements incurred , including the costs paid by the lessor ( the legal owner of the building ) and additional improvement costs paid by us , and a corresponding financing obligation of $ 39.6 million and $ 41.2 million , respectively . as of december 31 , 2017 , $ 1.9 million and $ 37.7 million were recorded as short-term and long-term financing obligations , respectively . land lease expense under our lease financing obligation amounted to $ 1.3 million for each of the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 and 2015 respectively. .

Question: what are the total financial obligations as of december 31 , 2107?
Answer: 39.6
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit . the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . 2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 1043.7
amount ( in millions ): mark-to-market tax settlement sharing; column_2: -195.9 ( 195.9 )
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 32.5
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 11.6
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -5.7 ( 5.7 )
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 886.2

Additional report context:
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .

Question: what is change in percentage points in net income margin in 2011?
Answer: 27.4