alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , llc management's financial discussion and analysis net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue; column_2: $ 991.1
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: -17.1 ( 17.1 )
amount ( in millions ): purchased power capacity; column_2: -12.0 ( 12.0 )
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -7.4 ( 7.4 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 4.6
amount ( in millions ): 2008 net revenue; column_2: $ 959.2

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the cessation of the interim storm recovery through the formula rate plan upon the act 55 financing of storm costs and a credit passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing , partially offset by increases in the formula rate plan effective october 2007 . refer to "hurricane rita and hurricane katrina" and "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the interim recovery of storm costs , the act 55 storm cost financing , and the formula rate plan filing . the purchased power capacity variance is due to the amortization of deferred capacity costs effective september 2007 as a result of the formula rate plan filing in may 2007 . purchased power capacity costs are offset in base revenues due to a base rate increase implemented to recover incremental deferred and ongoing purchased power capacity charges . see "state and local rate regulation" below for a discussion of the formula rate plan filing . the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to provisions recorded for potential rate refunds related to the treatment of interruptible load in pricing entergy system affiliate sales . gross operating revenue and , fuel and purchased power expenses gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 364.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to higher fuel rates offset by decreased usage . the increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 56.8 million in gross wholesale revenue due to a decrease in system agreement rough production cost equalization credits . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to increases in the average market prices of natural gas and purchased power , partially offset by a decrease in the recovery from customers of deferred fuel costs. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2008?
Answer: -3.2%
Financial report context:
american tower corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements ( 3 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 75.0 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 72.7 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 4 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on september 12 , 2012 , the company entered into a definitive agreement to purchase up to approximately 348 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on september 27 , 2012 and december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 279 and 2 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 63.5 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.8 million ) . the following table summarizes the preliminary allocation of the aggregate purchase consideration paid and the amounts of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based upon their estimated fair value at the date of acquisition ( in thousands ) : preliminary purchase price allocation .

Financial table:
preliminary purchase price allocation: current assets; column_2: $ 8763
preliminary purchase price allocation: non-current assets; column_2: 2332
preliminary purchase price allocation: property and equipment; column_2: 26711
preliminary purchase price allocation: intangible assets ( 1 ); column_2: 21079
preliminary purchase price allocation: other non-current liabilities; column_2: -1349 ( 1349 )
preliminary purchase price allocation: fair value of net assets acquired; column_2: $ 57536
preliminary purchase price allocation: goodwill ( 2 ); column_2: 5998

Additional report context:
( 1 ) consists of customer-related intangibles of approximately $ 10.7 million and network location intangibles of approximately $ 10.4 million . the customer-related intangibles and network location intangibles are being amortized on a straight-line basis over periods of up to 20 years . ( 2 ) the company expects that the goodwill recorded will be deductible for tax purposes . the goodwill was allocated to the company 2019s international rental and management segment . on november 16 , 2012 , the company entered into an agreement to purchase up to 198 additional communications sites from telef f3nica mexico . on december 14 , 2012 , the company completed the purchase of 188 communications sites , for an aggregate purchase price of $ 64.2 million ( including value added tax of $ 8.9 million ) . .

Question: for acquired customer-related and network location intangibles , what is the expected annual amortization expenses , in millions?
Answer: 7.4
Financial report context:
free cash flow conversion rate we believe this measure provides useful information to investors because it is important for assessing our efficiency in converting earnings to cash and returning cash to shareholders . the calculation of free cash flow conversion rate and net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate , its equivalent gaap measure , follows: .

Financial table:
in millions: net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrolling interests asreported; fiscal 2019: $ 1786.2
in millions: net tax benefit ( a ); fiscal 2019: $ -7.2 ( 7.2 )
in millions: tax item ( a ); fiscal 2019: -72.9 ( 72.9 )
in millions: mark-to-marketeffects net of tax ( b ); fiscal 2019: 27.7
in millions: acquisition integration costs net of tax ( c ); fiscal 2019: 19.7
in millions: divestitures loss net of tax ( c ); fiscal 2019: 16.4
in millions: restructuring charges net of tax ( d ); fiscal 2019: 63.0
in millions: project-related costs net of tax ( d ); fiscal 2019: 1.1
in millions: asset impairments net of tax ( d ); fiscal 2019: 159.7
in millions: hyperinflationary accounting net of tax ( e ); fiscal 2019: 3.2
in millions: investment valuation adjustments net of tax ( f ); fiscal 2019: -17.6 ( 17.6 )
in millions: legal recovery net of tax ( g ); fiscal 2019: -10.8 ( 10.8 )
in millions: cpw restructuring costs net of tax ( h ); fiscal 2019: 11.1
in millions: adjusted net earnings including earnings attributable to redeemable and noncontrollinginterests; fiscal 2019: $ 1979.6
in millions: net cash provided by operating activities; fiscal 2019: $ 2807.0
in millions: purchases of land buildings and equipment; fiscal 2019: -537.6 ( 537.6 )
in millions: free cash flow; fiscal 2019: $ 2269.4
in millions: net cash provided by operating activities conversion rate; fiscal 2019: 157% ( 157 % )
in millions: free cash flow conversion rate; fiscal 2019: 115% ( 115 % )

Additional report context:
( a ) see note 14 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( b ) see note 7 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( c ) see note 3 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( d ) see note 4 to the consolidated financial statements in item 8 of this report . ( e ) impact of hyperinflationary accounting for our argentina subsidiary , which was sold in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 . ( f ) valuation gains on certain corporate investments . ( g ) legal recovery related to our yoplait sas subsidiary . ( h ) the cpw restructuring charges are related to initiatives designed to improve profitability and growth that were approved in fiscal 2018 and 2019 . see our reconciliation below of the effective income tax rate as reported to the adjusted effective income tax rate for the tax impact of each item affecting comparability. .

Question: in 2019 what was the percent of the net earnings to the net cash provided by operating activities
Answer: 63.6%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . equity compensation plans 2019 information is incorporated by reference from part iii , item 12 , 201csecurity ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters , 201d of this document , and should be considered an integral part of item 5 . at january 31 , 2016 , there were 84607 shareholders of record . 3m 2019s stock is listed on the new york stock exchange , inc . ( nyse ) , the chicago stock exchange , inc. , and the swx swiss exchange . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 1.025 per share for each of the second , third , and fourth quarters of 2015 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2014 included a dividend paid in november 2014 of $ 0.855 per share and a dividend paid in march 2015 of $ 1.025 per share . cash dividends declared and paid totaled $ 0.855 per share for each of the second and third quarters of 2014 . cash dividends declared in the fourth quarter of 2013 include a dividend paid in march 2014 of $ 0.855 per share . stock price comparisons follow : stock price comparisons ( nyse composite transactions ) .

Financial table:
( per share amounts ): 2015 high; first quarter: $ 170.50; second quarter: $ 167.70; third quarter: $ 157.94; fourth quarter: $ 160.09; total: $ 170.50
( per share amounts ): 2015 low; first quarter: 157.74; second quarter: 153.92; third quarter: 134.00; fourth quarter: 138.57; total: 134.00
( per share amounts ): 2014 high; first quarter: $ 139.29; second quarter: $ 145.53; third quarter: $ 147.87; fourth quarter: $ 168.16; total: $ 168.16
( per share amounts ): 2014 low; first quarter: 123.61; second quarter: 132.02; third quarter: 138.43; fourth quarter: 130.60; total: 123.61

Additional report context:
issuer purchases of equity securities repurchases of 3m common stock are made to support the company 2019s stock-based employee compensation plans and for other corporate purposes . in february 2014 , 3m 2019s board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to $ 12 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date . in february 2016 , 3m 2019s board of directors replaced the company 2019s february 2014 repurchase program with a new repurchase program . this new program authorizes the repurchase of up to $ 10 billion of 3m 2019s outstanding common stock , with no pre-established end date. .

Question: in february 2016 what was the percent reduction in the board of directors authorized the repurchase to the february 2014
Answer: 16.7%
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2010; the priceline group inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2011; the priceline group inc .: 117.06; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.53; s&p 500index: 102.11; rdg internetcomposite: 102.11
measurement pointdecember 31: 2012; the priceline group inc .: 155.27; nasdaqcomposite index: 116.92; s&p 500index: 118.45; rdg internetcomposite: 122.23
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; the priceline group inc .: 290.93; nasdaqcomposite index: 166.19; s&p 500index: 156.82; rdg internetcomposite: 199.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; the priceline group inc .: 285.37; nasdaqcomposite index: 188.78; s&p 500index: 178.29; rdg internetcomposite: 195.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; the priceline group inc .: 319.10; nasdaqcomposite index: 199.95; s&p 500index: 180.75; rdg internetcomposite: 267.25

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percent of the growth of the the priceline group inc . from 2014 to 2015
Answer: 11.8%
Financial report context:
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2007 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2007 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 80 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 26 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 17 real estate companies and 15 banking companies . comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return .

Financial table:
2007: state street corporation; 2008: $ 100; 2009: $ 49; 2010: $ 55; 2011: $ 58; 2012: $ 52; column_7: $ 61
2007: s&p 500 index; 2008: 100; 2009: 63; 2010: 80; 2011: 92; 2012: 94; column_7: 109
2007: s&p financial index; 2008: 100; 2009: 45; 2010: 52; 2011: 59; 2012: 49; column_7: 63

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock in 2012 as a percentage of the average shareholder return on common stock in the s&p 500?
Answer: 56%
Financial report context:
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2009 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2014 , we repurchased 33035204 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 100.24 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2014 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Financial table:
period: oct . 1 through oct . 31; total number ofsharespurchased[a]: 3087549; averageprice paidpershare: $ 107.59; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announcedplan or program [b]: 3075000; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: 92618000
period: nov . 1 through nov . 30; total number ofsharespurchased[a]: 1877330; averageprice paidpershare: 119.84; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announcedplan or program [b]: 1875000; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: 90743000
period: dec . 1 through dec . 31; total number ofsharespurchased[a]: 2787108; averageprice paidpershare: 116.54; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announcedplan or program [b]: 2786400; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: 87956600
period: total; total number ofsharespurchased[a]: 7751987; averageprice paidpershare: $ 113.77; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announcedplan or program [b]: 7736400; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: n/a

Additional report context:
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 15587 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what percent of the share repurchases were in the fourth quarter?
Answer: 23.5%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2012 annual report 167 the chart shows that for year ended december 31 , 2012 , the firm posted market risk related gains on 220 of the 261 days in this period , with gains on eight days exceeding $ 200 million . the chart includes year to date losses incurred in the synthetic credit portfolio . cib and credit portfolio posted market risk-related gains on 254 days in the period . the inset graph looks at those days on which the firm experienced losses and depicts the amount by which var exceeded the actual loss on each of those days . of the losses that were sustained on the 41 days of the 261 days in the trading period , the firm sustained losses that exceeded the var measure on three of those days . these losses in excess of the var all occurred in the second quarter of 2012 and were due to the adverse effect of market movements on risk positions in the synthetic credit portfolio held by cio . during the year ended december 31 , 2012 , cib and credit portfolio experienced seven loss days ; none of the losses on those days exceeded their respective var measures . other risk measures debit valuation adjustment sensitivity the following table provides information about the gross sensitivity of dva to a one-basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spreads . this sensitivity represents the impact from a one-basis-point parallel shift in jpmorgan chase 2019s entire credit curve . however , the sensitivity at a single point in time multiplied by the change in credit spread at a single maturity point may not be representative of the actual dva gain or loss realized within a period . the actual results reflect the movement in credit spreads across various maturities , which typically do not move in a parallel fashion , and is the product of a constantly changing exposure profile , among other factors . debit valuation adjustment sensitivity ( in millions ) one basis-point increase in jpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread .

Financial table:
( in millions ): december 31 2012; one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread: $ 34
( in millions ): december 31 2011; one basis-point increase injpmorgan chase 2019s credit spread: 35

Additional report context:
economic-value stress testing along with var , stress testing is important in measuring and controlling risk . while var reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in markets using recent historical market behavior as an indicator of losses , stress testing captures the firm 2019s exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets . the firm runs weekly stress tests on market-related risks across the lines of business using multiple scenarios that assume significant changes in risk factors such as credit spreads , equity prices , interest rates , currency rates or commodity prices . the framework uses a grid-based approach , which calculates multiple magnitudes of stress for both market rallies and market sell-offs for .

Question: how often did the firm post gains exceeding $ 200 million in 2012?\\n
Answer: 3.1%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2018 form 10-k 41 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2013 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2013: $ 100.00; 2014: $ 109.88; 2015: $ 119.07; 2016: $ 160.23; 2017: $ 203.07; 2018: $ 189.57
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 109.36; 2015: 109.90; 2016: 141.23; 2017: 167.49; 2018: 137.82
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 115.18; 2015: 113.38; 2016: 139.17; 2017: 169.98; 2018: 147.82
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 113.68; 2015: 115.24; 2016: 129.02; 2017: 157.17; 2018: 150.27

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the kbw bank index?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

Financial table:
company/index: a o smith corp; baseperiod 12/31/02: 100.00; baseperiod 12/31/03: 132.23; baseperiod 12/31/04: 115.36; baseperiod 12/31/05: 138.20; baseperiod 12/31/06: 150.26; 12/31/07: 142.72
company/index: s&p smallcap 600 index; baseperiod 12/31/02: 100.00; baseperiod 12/31/03: 138.79; baseperiod 12/31/04: 170.22; baseperiod 12/31/05: 183.30; baseperiod 12/31/06: 211.01; 12/31/07: 210.39
company/index: s&p 600 electrical equipment; baseperiod 12/31/02: 100.00; baseperiod 12/31/03: 126.12; baseperiod 12/31/04: 152.18; baseperiod 12/31/05: 169.07; baseperiod 12/31/06: 228.83; 12/31/07: 253.33

Additional report context:
12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment .

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total return for the five year period ending 12/31/07 between a o smith corp and the s&p smallcap 600 index?
Answer: -67.67%