alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) these acquisitions have been recorded using the purchase method of accounting , and accordingly , the purchase price has been allocated to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition . the operating results of each acquisition are included in our consolidated statements of income from the dates of each acquisition . fiscal 2008 during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a portfolio of merchants that process discover transactions and the rights to process discover transactions for our existing and new merchants . as a result of this acquisition , we will now process discover transactions similarly to how we currently process visa and mastercard transactions . the purpose of this acquisition was to offer merchants a single point of contact for discover , visa and mastercard card processing . during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a majority of the assets of euroenvios money transfer , s.a . and euroenvios conecta , s.l. , which we collectively refer to as lfs spain . lfs spain consisted of two privately- held corporations engaged in money transmittal and ancillary services from spain to settlement locations primarily in latin america . the purpose of the acquisition was to further our strategy of expanding our customer base and market share by opening additional branch locations . during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a series of money transfer branch locations in the united states . the purpose of these acquisitions was to increase the market presence of our dolex-branded money transfer offering . the following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations of these business acquisitions ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
total: goodwill; column_2: $ 13536
total: customer-related intangible assets; column_2: 4091
total: contract-based intangible assets; column_2: 1031
total: property and equipment; column_2: 267
total: other current assets; column_2: 502
total: total assets acquired; column_2: 19427
total: current liabilities; column_2: -2347 ( 2347 )
total: minority interest in equity of subsidiary; column_2: -486 ( 486 )
total: net assets acquired; column_2: $ 16594

Additional report context:
the customer-related intangible assets have amortization periods of up to 14 years . the contract-based intangible assets have amortization periods of 3 to 10 years . these business acquisitions were not significant to our consolidated financial statements and accordingly , we have not provided pro forma information relating to these acquisitions . in addition , during fiscal 2008 , we acquired a customer list and long-term merchant referral agreement in our canadian merchant services channel for $ 1.7 million . the value assigned to the customer list of $ 0.1 million was expensed immediately . the remaining value was assigned to the merchant referral agreement and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over its useful life of 10 years. .

Question: what portion of the net assets acquired is related to goodwill?
Answer: 81.6%
Financial report context:
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) amortization expense for other intangible assets was approximately $ 75 million in 2017 , $ 77 million in 2016 , and $ 93 million in 2015 . the following table presents our estimate of amortization expense for each of the five next succeeding fiscal years: .

Financial table:
( in millions ): for the years ending december 31,
( in millions ): 2018; column_2: $ 64
( in millions ): 2019; column_2: 54
( in millions ): 2020; column_2: 52
( in millions ): 2021; column_2: 19
( in millions ): 2022; column_2: 16

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the ratio of the amortization expense for other intangible assets from to 20192018
Answer: 1.19
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 7 2014income taxes ( continued ) as of september 30 , 2006 , the company has state and foreign tax loss and state credit carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 55 million . certain of those carryforwards , the tax effect of which is $ 12 million , expire between 2016 and 2019 . a portion of these carryforwards was acquired from the company 2019s previous acquisitions , the utilization of which is subject to certain limitations imposed by the internal revenue code . the remaining benefits from tax losses and credits do not expire . as of september 30 , 2006 and september 24 , 2005 , a valuation allowance of $ 5 million was recorded against the deferred tax asset for the benefits of state operating losses that may not be realized . management believes it is more likely than not that forecasted income , including income that may be generated as a result of certain tax planning strategies , together with the tax effects of the deferred tax liabilities , will be sufficient to fully recover the remaining deferred tax assets . a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes , with the amount computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rate ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 ) to income before provision for income taxes , is as follows ( in millions ) : 2006 2005 2004 as restated ( 1 ) as restated ( 1 ) .

Financial table:
2006: computed expected tax; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): $ 987; 2004 as restated ( 1 ): $ 633; column_4: $ 129
2006: state taxes net of federal effect; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): 86; 2004 as restated ( 1 ): -19 ( 19 ); column_4: -5 ( 5 )
2006: indefinitely invested earnings of foreign subsidiaries; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): -224 ( 224 ); 2004 as restated ( 1 ): -98 ( 98 ); column_4: -31 ( 31 )
2006: nondeductible executive compensation; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): 11; 2004 as restated ( 1 ): 14; column_4: 12
2006: research and development credit net; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): -12 ( 12 ); 2004 as restated ( 1 ): -26 ( 26 ); column_4: -5 ( 5 )
2006: other items; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): -19 ( 19 ); 2004 as restated ( 1 ): -24 ( 24 ); column_4: 4
2006: provision for income taxes; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): $ 829; 2004 as restated ( 1 ): $ 480; column_4: $ 104
2006: effective tax rate; 2005 as restated ( 1 ): 29% ( 29 % ); 2004 as restated ( 1 ): 27% ( 27 % ); column_4: 28% ( 28 % )

Additional report context:
( 1 ) see note 2 , 201crestatement of consolidated financial statements . 201d the company 2019s income taxes payable has been reduced by the tax benefits from employee stock options . the company receives an income tax benefit calculated as the difference between the fair market value of the stock issued at the time of the exercise and the option price , tax effected . the net tax benefits from employee stock option transactions were $ 419 million , $ 428 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) , and $ 83 million ( as restated ( 1 ) ) in 2006 , 2005 , and 2004 , respectively , and were reflected as an increase to common stock in the consolidated statements of shareholders 2019 equity. .

Question: what was the 2006 tax expense?
Answer: 240.41
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2007 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

Financial table:
3/31/2007: abiomed inc; 3/31/2008: 100; 3/31/2009: 96.19; 3/31/2010: 35.87; 3/31/2011: 75.55; 3/31/2012: 106.37; column_7: 162.45
3/31/2007: nasdaq composite index; 3/31/2008: 100; 3/31/2009: 94.11; 3/31/2010: 63.12; 3/31/2011: 99.02; 3/31/2012: 114.84; column_7: 127.66
3/31/2007: nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849; 3/31/2008: 100; 3/31/2009: 82.91; 3/31/2010: 41.56; 3/31/2011: 77.93; 3/31/2012: 94.54; column_7: 74.40

Additional report context:
this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Question: did abiomed outperform the nasdaq composite index?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses . 2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 973.7
( in millions ): price applied to unbilled sales; column_2: -31.9 ( 31.9 )
( in millions ): deferred fuel cost revisions; column_2: -29.4 ( 29.4 )
( in millions ): rate refund provisions; column_2: -12.2 ( 12.2 )
( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 17.0
( in millions ): summer capacity charges; column_2: 11.8
( in millions ): other; column_2: 2.3
( in millions ): 2004 net revenue; column_2: $ 931.3

Additional report context:
the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds . the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors . the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what are the deferred fuel cost revisions as a percentage of 2004 net revenue?
Answer: 3.16%
Financial report context:
the decrease in mortgage servicing rights of $ 2.7 billion was primarily 2022 attributed to mark-to-market losses recognized in the portfolio due to decreases in the mortgage interest rates and increases in refinancing . the increase in securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $ 5 2022 billion is driven by a $ 6.2 billion increase from net transfers in as the continued credit crisis impacted the availability of observable inputs for the underlying securities related to this liability . this was offset by a reduction from net settlements of $ 1.4 billion . the decrease in short-term borrowings of $ 3.7 billion is due to net transfers 2022 out of $ 1.8 billion as valuation methodology inputs considered to be unobservable were determined not to be significant to the overall valuation . in addition , net payments of $ 1.8 billion were made during the year . the increase in 2022 long-term debt of $ 2.2 billion is driven by : the net transfers in of $ 38.8 billion , substantially all of which related 2013 to the transfer of consolidated siv debt in the first quarter of 2008 , as the availability of observable inputs continued to decline due to the current crisis ; offset by $ 2.2 billion in gains recognized as credit spreads widened during the 2013 year ; and $ 34.3 billion decrease from net settlements/payments . included in 2013 these settlements were $ 21 billion of payments made on maturing siv debt and the replacement of $ 17 billion of non-recourse , consolidated siv debt classified as level 3 with citigroup debt classified as level 2 . this replacement occurred in connection with the purchase of the siv assets by the company in november 2008 . items measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the tables above . these include assets measured at cost that have been written down to fair value during the periods as a result of an impairment . in addition , these assets include loans held-for-sale that are measured at locom that were recognized at fair value below cost at the end of the period . the fair value of loans measured on a locom basis is determined where possible using quoted secondary-market prices . such loans are generally classified as level 2 of the fair-value hierarchy given the level of activity in the market and the frequency of available quotes . if no such quoted price exists , the fair value of a loan is determined using quoted prices for a similar asset or assets , adjusted for the specific attributes of that loan . the following table presents all loans held-for-sale that are carried at locom as of december 31 , 2009 and 2008 ( in billions ) : aggregate cost fair value level 2 level 3 .

Financial table:
aggregate cost: december 31 2009; fair value: $ 2.5; level 2: $ 1.6; level 3: $ 0.3; column_5: $ 1.3
aggregate cost: december 31 2008; fair value: 3.1; level 2: 2.1; level 3: 0.8; column_5: 1.3

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the ratio of the net increase in the in securities sold under agreements to repurchase to the net transfers in
Answer: 0.81
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested . no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock . stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns . comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc . nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .

Financial table:
july 27 2000: illumina inc .; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 100.39; december 27 2002: 71.44; december 26 2003: 19.50; column_6: 43.81
july 27 2000: nasdaq composite index; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 63.84; december 27 2002: 51.60; december 26 2003: 35.34; column_6: 51.73
july 27 2000: nasdaq pharmaceutical index; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 93.20; december 27 2002: 82.08; december 26 2003: 51.96; column_6: 74.57

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total stockholder return percentage for illumina inc . common stock versus the nasdaq pharmaceutical index for the four years end 2003?
Answer: -30.76
Financial report context:
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p small cap 600 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2005 to december 31 , 2010 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

Financial table:
company/index: a o smith corp; baseperiod 12/31/05: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/06: 108.7; baseperiod 12/31/07: 103.3; baseperiod 12/31/08: 88.8; baseperiod 12/31/09: 133.6; 12/31/10: 178.8
company/index: s&p small cap 600 index; baseperiod 12/31/05: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/06: 115.1; baseperiod 12/31/07: 114.8; baseperiod 12/31/08: 78.1; baseperiod 12/31/09: 98.0; 12/31/10: 123.8
company/index: russell 1000 index; baseperiod 12/31/05: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/06: 115.5; baseperiod 12/31/07: 122.1; baseperiod 12/31/08: 76.2; baseperiod 12/31/09: 97.9; 12/31/10: 113.6

Additional report context:
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the difference in the cumulative total return for a o smith corp and the russell 1000 index for the five year period ended 12/31/10?
Answer: 65.2%
Financial report context:
2007 annual report 21 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since 2002 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Financial table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2002; snap-on incorporated: $ 100.00; peer group ( 3 ): $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2003; snap-on incorporated: 118.80; peer group ( 3 ): 126.16; s&p 500: 128.68
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2004; snap-on incorporated: 130.66; peer group ( 3 ): 152.42; s&p 500: 142.69
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2005; snap-on incorporated: 146.97; peer group ( 3 ): 157.97; s&p 500: 149.70
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2006; snap-on incorporated: 191.27; peer group ( 3 ): 185.10; s&p 500: 173.34
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2007; snap-on incorporated: 198.05; peer group ( 3 ): 216.19; s&p 500: 182.87

Additional report context:
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday closest to december 31 of each year ; the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 for ease of calculation . ( 3 ) the peer group includes : the black & decker corporation , cooper industries , ltd. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , fortune brands , inc. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair , inc. , spx corporation , the stanley works and w.w . grainger , inc. .

Question: what is the roi in s&p500 if the investment was made at the end of 2005 and sold at the end of 2007?
Answer: 22.2%
Financial report context:
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . the goldman sachs group , inc . s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .

Financial table:
12/26/08: the goldman sachs group inc .; 12/31/09: $ 100.00; 12/31/10: $ 224.98; 12/31/11: $ 226.19; 12/31/12: $ 123.05; 12/31/13: $ 176.42; column_7: $ 248.36
12/26/08: s&p 500 index; 12/31/09: 100.00; 12/31/10: 130.93; 12/31/11: 150.65; 12/31/12: 153.83; 12/31/13: 178.42; column_7: 236.20
12/26/08: s&p 500 financials index; 12/31/09: 100.00; 12/31/10: 124.38; 12/31/11: 139.47; 12/31/12: 115.67; 12/31/13: 148.92; column_7: 201.92

Additional report context:
218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return for goldman sachs group inc . for the five year period ending 12/31/13?
Answer: 148.36%