alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
there were no share repurchases in 2016 . stock performance graph the graph below matches fidelity national information services , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services index.aa the graph tracks the performance of a $ 100 investment in our common stock and in each index ( with the reinvestment of all dividends ) from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

Financial table:
12/11: fidelity national information services inc .; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 134.12; 12/14: 210.97; 12/15: 248.68; 12/16: 246.21; column_7: 311.81
12/11: s&p 500; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 116.00; 12/14: 153.58; 12/15: 174.60; 12/16: 177.01; column_7: 198.18
12/11: s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 126.06; 12/14: 194.91; 12/15: 218.05; 12/16: 247.68; column_7: 267.14

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 . selected financial ss the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with "item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , " and "item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , " included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . compared to the s&p 500 for the period ending 12/16?
Answer: 113.63%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2016 and 2015. .

Financial table:
2016: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 102.93; low: $ 83.07
2016: quarter ended june 30; high: 113.63; low: 101.87
2016: quarter ended september 30; high: 118.26; low: 107.57
2016: quarter ended december 31; high: 118.09; low: 99.72
2016: 2015; high: high; low: low
2016: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 101.88; low: $ 93.21
2016: quarter ended june 30; high: 98.64; low: 91.99
2016: quarter ended september 30; high: 101.54; low: 86.83
2016: quarter ended december 31; high: 104.12; low: 87.23

Additional report context:
on february 17 , 2017 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 108.11 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 17 , 2017 , we had 427195037 outstanding shares of common stock and 153 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , issued in may 2014 , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 3.2 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2017 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income. .

Question: for the quarter ended march 312015 what was the percentage change in the share price from the highest to the lowest
Answer: 9.3
Financial report context:
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . the goldman sachs group , inc . s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .

Financial table:
12/26/08: the goldman sachs group inc .; 12/31/09: $ 100.00; 12/31/10: $ 224.98; 12/31/11: $ 226.19; 12/31/12: $ 123.05; 12/31/13: $ 176.42; column_7: $ 248.36
12/26/08: s&p 500 index; 12/31/09: 100.00; 12/31/10: 130.93; 12/31/11: 150.65; 12/31/12: 153.83; 12/31/13: 178.42; column_7: 236.20
12/26/08: s&p 500 financials index; 12/31/09: 100.00; 12/31/10: 124.38; 12/31/11: 139.47; 12/31/12: 115.67; 12/31/13: 148.92; column_7: 201.92

Additional report context:
218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for goldman sachs group inc . and the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 12/31/13?
Answer: 12.16%
Financial report context:
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis other regulatory charges ( credits ) have no material effect on net income due to recovery and/or refund of such expenses . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the under-recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity charges . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy mississippi's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2002 net revenue; column_2: $ 380.2
( in millions ): base rates; column_2: 48.3
( in millions ): other; column_2: -1.9 ( 1.9 )
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 426.6

Additional report context:
the increase in base rates was effective january 2003 as approved by the mpsc . gross operating revenue , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase in base rates effective january 2003 and an increase of $ 29.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to quarterly changes in the fuel factor resulting from the increases in market prices of natural gas and purchased power . this increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 35.9 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of decreased generation and purchases that resulted in less energy available for resale sales . fuel and fuel-related expenses decreased primarily due to the decreased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and decreased generation , partially offset by an increase in the market price of purchased power . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to over-recovery of capacity charges related to the grand gulf rate rider and the cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 6.6 million in customer service support costs ; and 2022 an increase of $ 3.7 million in benefit costs . the increase was partially offset by the absence of the voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million that occurred in 2003 . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to a higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes compared to the same period in 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million ; and 2022 an increase of $ 4.4 million in benefit costs. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue for entergy mississippi , inc . in 2003?
Answer: 12.2%
Financial report context:
.

Financial table:
currency: real; 2012: $ 40.4; 2011: $ 42.4; 2010: $ 32.5
currency: euro; 2012: 27.1; 2011: 26.4; 2010: 18.6
currency: pound sterling; 2012: 18.5; 2011: 17.6; 2010: 9.0
currency: indian rupee; 2012: 4.3; 2011: 3.6; 2010: 2.6
currency: total impact; 2012: $ 90.3; 2011: $ 90.0; 2010: $ 62.7

Additional report context:
the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant . revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes . we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 42%
Financial report context:
compensation plan approved by security holders . the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders . in connection with our mergers with cbot holdings and nymex holdings , we assumed their existing equity plans . the shares relating to the cbot holdings and nymex holdings plans are listed in the table below as being made under an equity compensation plan approved by security holders based upon the fact that shareholders of the company approved the related merger transactions . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5978 22.00 2014 .

Financial table:
plan category: equity compensation plans approved by security holders; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 1211143; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): $ 308.10; number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ): 5156223
plan category: equity compensation plans not approved by security holders; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 5978; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): 22.00; number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ): 2014
plan category: total; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 1217121; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): 5156223

Additional report context:
item 13 . certain relationships , related transactions and director independence the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201ccertain business relationships with related parties 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2014director independence 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201caudit committee disclosures 2014principal accountant fees and services 201d and 201caudit committee disclosures 2014audit committee policy for approval of audit and permitted non-audit services 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . .

Question: assuming all options in the compensation plans approved by security holders were exercised , what would be the deemed proceeds to the company?
Answer: 373153150
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements the following table sets forth the activity related to the 2005 restructuring plan liabilities . ( millions ) .

Financial table:
balance at january 1 2005: expensed in 2005; $ 2014: 141
balance at january 1 2005: cash payments in 2005; $ 2014: -23 ( 23 )
balance at january 1 2005: foreign currency revaluation; $ 2014: -2 ( 2 )
balance at january 1 2005: balance at december 31 2005; $ 2014: 116
balance at january 1 2005: expensed in 2006; $ 2014: 155
balance at january 1 2005: cash payments in 2006; $ 2014: -141 ( 141 )
balance at january 1 2005: foreign currency revaluation; $ 2014: 4
balance at january 1 2005: balance at december 31 2006; $ 2014: 134
balance at january 1 2005: expensed in 2007; $ 2014: 38
balance at january 1 2005: cash payments in 2007; $ 2014: -110 ( 110 )
balance at january 1 2005: foreign currency revaluation; $ 2014: 1
balance at january 1 2005: balance at december 31 2007; $ 2014: $ 63

Additional report context:
aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities are included in both accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial position . aon corporation .

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2006?
Answer: 18
Financial report context:
compensation plan approved by security holders . the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders . in connection with our mergers with cbot holdings and nymex holdings , we assumed their existing equity plans . the shares relating to the cbot holdings and nymex holdings plans are listed in the table below as being made under an equity compensation plan approved by security holders based upon the fact that shareholders of the company approved the related merger transactions . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5978 22.00 2014 .

Financial table:
plan category: equity compensation plans approved by security holders; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 1211143; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): $ 308.10; number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ): 5156223
plan category: equity compensation plans not approved by security holders; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 5978; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): 22.00; number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ): 2014
plan category: total; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 1217121; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): 5156223

Additional report context:
item 13 . certain relationships , related transactions and director independence the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201ccertain business relationships with related parties 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2014director independence 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201caudit committee disclosures 2014principal accountant fees and services 201d and 201caudit committee disclosures 2014audit committee policy for approval of audit and permitted non-audit services 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . .

Question: what percentage of the outstanding options were from plans approved by security holders?
Answer: 99.5%
Financial report context:
stock total return performance the following graph compares our total return to stockholders with the returns of the standard & poor 2019s composite 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and the dow jones us select health care providers index ( 201cpeer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2014 . the graph assumes an investment of $ 100 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 , and the peer group on december 31 , 2009 , and that dividends were reinvested when paid. .

Financial table:
12/31/2009: hum; 12/31/2010: $ 100; 12/31/2011: $ 125; 12/31/2012: $ 201; 12/31/2013: $ 160; 12/31/2014: $ 244; column_7: $ 342
12/31/2009: s&p 500; 12/31/2010: $ 100; 12/31/2011: $ 115; 12/31/2012: $ 117; 12/31/2013: $ 136; 12/31/2014: $ 180; column_7: $ 205
12/31/2009: peer group; 12/31/2010: $ 100; 12/31/2011: $ 112; 12/31/2012: $ 123; 12/31/2013: $ 144; 12/31/2014: $ 198; column_7: $ 252

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . table of contents .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the stock price performance for hum from 2010 to 2011
Answer: 60.8%
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions . there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .

Financial table:
2009: vornado realty trust; 2010: $ 100; 2011: $ 123; 2012: $ 118; 2013: $ 128; 2014: $ 147; column_7: $ 201
2009: s&p 500 index; 2010: 100; 2011: 115; 2012: 117; 2013: 136; 2014: 180; column_7: 205
2009: the nareit all equity index; 2010: 100; 2011: 128; 2012: 139; 2013: 166; 2014: 171; column_7: 218

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the five year change in the vornado realty trust index?
Answer: 101
Financial report context:
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2012 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/07 ) total return analysis .

Financial table:
12/31/2007: ball corporation; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 93.28; 12/31/2010: $ 117.01; 12/31/2011: $ 155.14; 12/31/2012: $ 164.09; column_7: $ 207.62
12/31/2007: dj us containers & packaging; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 61.55; 12/31/2010: $ 84.76; 12/31/2011: $ 97.78; 12/31/2012: $ 96.27; column_7: $ 107.76
12/31/2007: s&p 500; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 61.51; 12/31/2010: $ 75.94; 12/31/2011: $ 85.65; 12/31/2012: $ 85.65; column_7: $ 97.13

Additional report context:
source : bloomberg l.p . aecharts .

Question: the five year total return for the period ending 12/31/2012 on ball corporation stock was how much greater than the same return on the s&p 500?
Answer: 213.8%
Financial report context:
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2012 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/07 ) total return analysis .

Financial table:
12/31/2007: ball corporation; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 93.28; 12/31/2010: $ 117.01; 12/31/2011: $ 155.14; 12/31/2012: $ 164.09; column_7: $ 207.62
12/31/2007: dj us containers & packaging; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 61.55; 12/31/2010: $ 84.76; 12/31/2011: $ 97.78; 12/31/2012: $ 96.27; column_7: $ 107.76
12/31/2007: s&p 500; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 61.51; 12/31/2010: $ 75.94; 12/31/2011: $ 85.65; 12/31/2012: $ 85.65; column_7: $ 97.13

Additional report context:
source : bloomberg l.p . aecharts .

Question: the five year total return for the period ending 12/31/2012 on ball corporation stock was how much greater than the same return on the dj us containers & packaging index?
Answer: 110.49