alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the graph depicted below shows a comparison of our cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the nasdaq stock market index , and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index , from the date of our initial public offering on july 27 , 2000 through december 26 , 2003 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on july 27 , 2000 , in our common stock and in each index , and that all dividends were reinvested . no cash dividends have been declared on our common stock . stockholder returns over the indicated period should not be considered indicative of future stockholder returns . comparison of total return among illumina , inc. , the nasdaq composite index and the nasdaq pharmaceutical index december 26 , 2003december 27 , 2002december 28 , 2001december 29 , 2000july 27 , 2000 illumina , inc . nasdaq composite index nasdaq pharmaceutical index july 27 , december 29 , december 28 , december 27 , december 26 , 2000 2000 2001 2002 2003 .

Financial table:
july 27 2000: illumina inc .; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 100.39; december 27 2002: 71.44; december 26 2003: 19.50; column_6: 43.81
july 27 2000: nasdaq composite index; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 63.84; december 27 2002: 51.60; december 26 2003: 35.34; column_6: 51.73
july 27 2000: nasdaq pharmaceutical index; december 29 2000: 100.00; december 28 2001: 93.20; december 27 2002: 82.08; december 26 2003: 51.96; column_6: 74.57

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the cumulative total stockholder return percentage for illumina inc . common stock for the four years end 2003?
Answer: -56.19%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the line graph that follows compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones u.s . technology index* and the standard & poor 2019s s&p 500* index for the five years ended december 28 , 2013 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 ( the last day of trading for the fiscal year ended december 27 , 2008 ) in each of our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index , and that all dividends were reinvested . cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index are based on our fiscal year . comparison of five-year cumulative return for intel , the dow jones u.s . technology index* , and the s&p 500* index .

Financial table:
2008: intel corporation; 2009: $ 100; 2010: $ 148; 2011: $ 157; 2012: $ 191; 2013: $ 163; column_7: $ 214
2008: dow jones u.s . technology index; 2009: $ 100; 2010: $ 170; 2011: $ 191; 2012: $ 191; 2013: $ 209; column_7: $ 270
2008: s&p 500 index; 2009: $ 100; 2010: $ 132; 2011: $ 151; 2012: $ 154; 2013: $ 175; column_7: $ 236

Additional report context:
table of contents .

Question: what was the percentage five-year cumulative return for intel for the five years ended 2013?
Answer: 114%
Financial report context:
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2008 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Financial table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2008; snap-onincorporated: $ 100.00; peer group ( 3 ): $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2009; snap-onincorporated: 111.40; peer group ( 3 ): 127.17; s&p 500: 126.46
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2010; snap-onincorporated: 153.24; peer group ( 3 ): 169.36; s&p 500: 145.51
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2011; snap-onincorporated: 140.40; peer group ( 3 ): 165.85; s&p 500: 148.59
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2012; snap-onincorporated: 223.82; peer group ( 3 ): 195.02; s&p 500: 172.37
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2013; snap-onincorporated: 315.72; peer group ( 3 ): 265.68; s&p 500: 228.19

Additional report context:
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . 24 snap-on incorporated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 .

Question: in the five-year stock performance graph what was the ratio of the of the snap-on incorporated to the peer group performance in december 31 2012
Answer: 1.15
Financial report context:
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2012: jkhy; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 138.34; 2015: 177.10; 2016: 195.72; 2017: 267.64; column_7: 322.60
2012: peer group; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 117.87; 2015: 161.90; 2016: 203.87; 2017: 233.39; column_7: 271.10
2012: s&p 500; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 120.60; 2015: 150.27; 2016: 161.43; 2017: 167.87; column_7: 197.92

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .

Question: what was the 2015 total return for the peer group?
Answer: 41.97
Financial report context:
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 201cs&p industrials index 201d ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 201cs&p consumer durables & apparel index 201d ) , from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 16.66 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . performance graph 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2007 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

Financial table:
2008: masco; 2009: $ 55.78; 2010: $ 71.52; 2011: $ 67.12; 2012: $ 52.15; column_6: $ 92.49
2008: s&p 500 index; 2009: $ 63.45; 2010: $ 79.90; 2011: $ 91.74; 2012: $ 93.67; column_6: $ 108.55
2008: s&p industrials index; 2009: $ 60.60; 2010: $ 72.83; 2011: $ 92.04; 2012: $ 91.50; column_6: $ 105.47
2008: s&p consumer durables & apparel index; 2009: $ 66.43; 2010: $ 90.54; 2011: $ 118.19; 2012: $ 127.31; column_6: $ 154.72

Additional report context:
in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2012 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 24 million shares . during the first quarter of 2012 , we repurchased and retired one million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 8 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2012 grant of one million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2012. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative return of masco for the five year period ending 2012?
Answer: -7.51%
Financial report context:
there were no share repurchases in 2016 . stock performance graph the graph below matches fidelity national information services , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services index.aa the graph tracks the performance of a $ 100 investment in our common stock and in each index ( with the reinvestment of all dividends ) from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

Financial table:
12/11: fidelity national information services inc .; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 134.12; 12/14: 210.97; 12/15: 248.68; 12/16: 246.21; column_7: 311.81
12/11: s&p 500; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 116.00; 12/14: 153.58; 12/15: 174.60; 12/16: 177.01; column_7: 198.18
12/11: s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 126.06; 12/14: 194.91; 12/15: 218.05; 12/16: 247.68; column_7: 267.14

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 . selected financial ss the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with "item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , " and "item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , " included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what is the total return if $ 100000 are invested in fidelity national information system in 12/11 and sold in 12/16?
Answer: 211810
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2009 annual report 173 trading assets and liabilities average balances average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated. .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading assets 2013 debt and equity instruments; 2009: $ 318063; 2008: $ 384102; 2007: $ 381415
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading assets 2013 derivative receivables; 2009: 110457; 2008: 121417; 2007: 65439
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading liabilities 2013 debt and equityinstruments ( a ); 2009: $ 60224; 2008: $ 78841; 2007: $ 94737
year ended december 31 ( in millions ): trading liabilities 2013 derivative payables; 2009: 77901; 2008: 93200; 2007: 65198

Additional report context:
( a ) primarily represent securities sold , not yet purchased . note 4 2013 fair value option the fair value option provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets , financial liabilities , unrecognized firm commitments , and written loan com- mitments not previously carried at fair value . elections elections were made by the firm to : 2022 mitigate income statement volatility caused by the differences in the measurement basis of elected instruments ( for example , cer- tain instruments elected were previously accounted for on an accrual basis ) while the associated risk management arrange- ments are accounted for on a fair value basis ; 2022 eliminate the complexities of applying certain accounting models ( e.g. , hedge accounting or bifurcation accounting for hybrid in- struments ) ; and 2022 better reflect those instruments that are managed on a fair value basis . elections include : 2022 securities financing arrangements with an embedded derivative and/or a maturity of greater than one year . 2022 loans purchased or originated as part of securitization ware- housing activity , subject to bifurcation accounting , or managed on a fair value basis . 2022 structured notes issued as part of ib 2019s client-driven activities . ( structured notes are financial instruments that contain embed- ded derivatives. ) 2022 certain tax credits and other equity investments acquired as part of the washington mutual transaction . the cumulative effect on retained earnings of the adoption of the fair value option on january 1 , 2007 , was $ 199 million. .

Question: what is the total equity in 2009 , in millions of dollars?
Answer: 290395
Financial report context:
6 . principal transactions citi 2019s principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities . trading activities include revenues from fixed income , equities , credit and commodities products and foreign exchange transactions that are managed on a portfolio basis characterized by primary risk . not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities , which is an integral part of trading activities 2019 profitability . for additional information regarding principal transactions revenue , see note a04 to the consolidated financial statements for information about net interest revenue related to trading activities . principal transactions include cva ( credit valuation adjustments on derivatives ) and fva ( funding valuation adjustments ) on over-the-counter derivatives . these adjustments are discussed further in note 24 to the consolidated financial statements . the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: interest rate risks ( 1 ); 2018: $ 5186; 2017: $ 5301; 2016: $ 4229
in millions of dollars: foreign exchange risks ( 2 ); 2018: 1423; 2017: 2435; 2016: 1699
in millions of dollars: equity risks ( 3 ); 2018: 1346; 2017: 525; 2016: 330
in millions of dollars: commodity and other risks ( 4 ); 2018: 662; 2017: 425; 2016: 899
in millions of dollars: credit products and risks ( 5 ); 2018: 445; 2017: 789; 2016: 700
in millions of dollars: total; 2018: $ 9062; 2017: $ 9475; 2016: $ 7857

Additional report context:
( 1 ) includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt , municipal securities , mortgage securities and other debt instruments . also includes spot and forward trading of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter ( otc ) currency options , options on fixed income securities , interest rate swaps , currency swaps , swap options , caps and floors , financial futures , otc options and forward contracts on fixed income securities . ( 2 ) includes revenues from foreign exchange spot , forward , option and swap contracts , as well as foreign currency translation ( fx translation ) gains and losses . ( 3 ) includes revenues from common , preferred and convertible preferred stock , convertible corporate debt , equity-linked notes and exchange-traded and otc equity options and warrants . ( 4 ) primarily includes revenues from crude oil , refined oil products , natural gas and other commodities trades . ( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Question: what was the percent of the principal transactions revenue associated with foreign exchange risks in 2017
Answer: 25.7%
Financial report context:
part i item 1 entergy corporation , domestic utility companies , and system energy research spending entergy is a member of the electric power research institute ( epri ) . epri conducts a broad range of research in major technical fields related to the electric utility industry . entergy participates in various epri projects based on entergy's needs and available resources . the domestic utility companies contributed $ 1.5 million in 2003 , $ 2.1 million in 2002 , and $ 4 million in 2001 to epri . the non-utility nuclear business contributed $ 3 million in 2003 and 2002 and $ 2 million in 2001 to epri . employees employees are an integral part of entergy's commitment to serving its customers . as of december 31 , 2003 , entergy employed 14773 people. .

Financial table:
entergy arkansas: entergy gulf states; 1516: 1676
entergy arkansas: entergy louisiana; 1516: 918
entergy arkansas: entergy mississippi; 1516: 810
entergy arkansas: entergy new orleans; 1516: 375
entergy arkansas: system energy; 1516: -
entergy arkansas: entergy operations; 1516: 2902
entergy arkansas: entergy services; 1516: 2755
entergy arkansas: entergy nuclear operations; 1516: 3357
entergy arkansas: other subsidiaries; 1516: 255
entergy arkansas: total full-time; 1516: 14564
entergy arkansas: part-time; 1516: 209
entergy arkansas: total entergy; 1516: 14773

Additional report context:
approximately 4900 employees are represented by the international brotherhood of electrical workers union , the utility workers union of america , and the international brotherhood of teamsters union. .

Question: what portion of the total entergy staff is employed at entergy operations?
Answer: 19.6%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the line graph that follows compares the cumulative total stockholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones u.s . technology index* and the standard & poor 2019s s&p 500* index for the five years ended december 28 , 2013 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 ( the last day of trading for the fiscal year ended december 27 , 2008 ) in each of our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index , and that all dividends were reinvested . cumulative total stockholder returns for our common stock , the dow jones u.s . technology index , and the s&p 500 index are based on our fiscal year . comparison of five-year cumulative return for intel , the dow jones u.s . technology index* , and the s&p 500* index .

Financial table:
2008: intel corporation; 2009: $ 100; 2010: $ 148; 2011: $ 157; 2012: $ 191; 2013: $ 163; column_7: $ 214
2008: dow jones u.s . technology index; 2009: $ 100; 2010: $ 170; 2011: $ 191; 2012: $ 191; 2013: $ 209; column_7: $ 270
2008: s&p 500 index; 2009: $ 100; 2010: $ 132; 2011: $ 151; 2012: $ 154; 2013: $ 175; column_7: $ 236

Additional report context:
table of contents .

Question: what was the difference in percentage five-year cumulative return for intel versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended 2013?
Answer: -22%
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph and table compares the cumulative five-year total return provided to shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and our customized peer group . the peer group includes cboe holdings , inc. , intercontinentalexchange group , inc . and nasdaq , inc . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 cme group inc . s&p 500 peer group * $ 100 invested on 12/31/12 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Financial table:
2013: cme group inc .; 2014: $ 164.01; 2015: $ 194.06; 2016: $ 208.95; 2017: $ 279.85; column_6: $ 370.32
2013: s&p 500; 2014: 132.39; 2015: 150.51; 2016: 152.59; 2017: 170.84; column_6: 208.14
2013: peer group; 2014: 176.61; 2015: 187.48; 2016: 219.99; 2017: 249.31; column_6: 323.23

Additional report context:
unregistered sales of equity securities during the past three years there have not been any unregistered sales by the company of equity securities. .

Question: in 2017 what was the ratio of the the cme group inc . stock perfomamce to the s&p
Answer: 1.8
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements the following table sets forth the activity related to the 2005 restructuring plan liabilities . ( millions ) .

Financial table:
balance at january 1 2005: expensed in 2005; $ 2014: 141
balance at january 1 2005: cash payments in 2005; $ 2014: -23 ( 23 )
balance at january 1 2005: foreign currency revaluation; $ 2014: -2 ( 2 )
balance at january 1 2005: balance at december 31 2005; $ 2014: 116
balance at january 1 2005: expensed in 2006; $ 2014: 155
balance at january 1 2005: cash payments in 2006; $ 2014: -141 ( 141 )
balance at january 1 2005: foreign currency revaluation; $ 2014: 4
balance at january 1 2005: balance at december 31 2006; $ 2014: 134
balance at january 1 2005: expensed in 2007; $ 2014: 38
balance at january 1 2005: cash payments in 2007; $ 2014: -110 ( 110 )
balance at january 1 2005: foreign currency revaluation; $ 2014: 1
balance at january 1 2005: balance at december 31 2007; $ 2014: $ 63

Additional report context:
aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities are included in both accounts payable and accrued liabilities and other non-current liabilities in the consolidated statements of financial position . aon corporation .

Question: what is the net change in aon 2019s unpaid restructuring liabilities during 2007?
Answer: -71