alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 77787 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2017 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2016 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2011 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Financial table:
date: 31-dec-2011; citi: 100.0; s&p 500: 100.0; s&p financials: 100.0
date: 31-dec-2012; citi: 150.6; s&p 500: 116.0; s&p financials: 128.8
date: 31-dec-2013; citi: 198.5; s&p 500: 153.6; s&p financials: 174.7
date: 31-dec-2014; citi: 206.3; s&p 500: 174.6; s&p financials: 201.3
date: 31-dec-2015; citi: 197.8; s&p 500: 177.0; s&p financials: 198.2
date: 31-dec-2016; citi: 229.3; s&p 500: 198.2; s&p financials: 243.4

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percent of the growth for s&p financials cumulative total return from 2013 to 2014
Answer: 26.6
Financial report context:
stock price performance the following graph shows a comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s retail index . the graph assumes that the value of an investment in our common stock and in each such index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , and that any dividends have been reinvested . the comparison in the graph below is based solely on historical data and is not intended to forecast the possible future performance of our common stock . comparison of cumulative total return among advance auto parts , inc. , s&p 500 index and s&p retail index company/index december 31 , december 29 , december 28 , january 3 , january 2 , december 31 .

Financial table:
company/index: advance auto parts; december 31 2011: $ 100.00; december 29 2012: $ 102.87; december 28 2013: $ 158.46; january 3 2015: $ 228.88; january 2 2016: $ 217.49; december 31 2016: $ 244.64
company/index: s&p 500 index; december 31 2011: 100.00; december 29 2012: 114.07; december 28 2013: 152.98; january 3 2015: 174.56; january 2 2016: 177.01; december 31 2016: 198.18
company/index: s&p retail index; december 31 2011: 100.00; december 29 2012: 122.23; december 28 2013: 178.55; january 3 2015: 196.06; january 2 2016: 245.31; december 31 2016: 256.69

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the rate of return on an investment in s&p500 index from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 1.4%
Financial report context:
during the third quarter ended 30 june 2017 , we recognized a goodwill impairment charge of $ 145.3 and an intangible asset impairment charge of $ 16.8 associated with our lasa reporting unit . refer to note 11 , goodwill , and note 12 , intangible assets , for more information related to these charges and the associated fair value measurement methods and significant inputs/assumptions , which were classified as level 3 since unobservable inputs were utilized in the fair value measurements . 16 . debt the tables below summarize our outstanding debt at 30 september 2019 and 2018 : total debt .

Financial table:
30 september: short-term borrowings; 2019: $ 58.2; 2018: $ 54.3
30 september: current portion of long-term debt ( a ) ( b ); 2019: 40.4; 2018: 406.6
30 september: long-term debt; 2019: 2907.3; 2018: 2967.4
30 september: long-term debt 2013 related party ( b ); 2019: 320.1; 2018: 384.3
30 september: total debt; 2019: $ 3326.0; 2018: $ 3812.6

Additional report context:
( a ) fiscal year 2019 includes the current portion of long-term debt owed to a related party of $ 37.8 . ( b ) refer to note 7 , acquisitions , for additional information regarding related party debt . short-term borrowings short-term borrowings consisted of bank obligations of $ 58.2 and $ 54.3 at 30 september 2019 and 2018 , respectively . the weighted average interest rate of short-term borrowings outstanding at 30 september 2019 and 2018 was 3.7% ( 3.7 % ) and 5.0% ( 5.0 % ) , respectively. .

Question: what is the short-term debt as a percent of long-term debt , in 2019?
Answer: 1.80%
Financial report context:
note 4 - goodwill and other intangible assets : goodwill the company had approximately $ 93.2 million and $ 94.4 million of goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 , respectively . the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
2017: balance beginning of year; 2016: $ 94417; column_3: $ 10258
2017: goodwill acquired as part of acquisition; 2016: 2014; column_3: 84159
2017: working capital settlement; 2016: -1225 ( 1225 ); column_3: 2014
2017: impairment loss; 2016: 2014; column_3: 2014
2017: balance end of year; 2016: $ 93192; column_3: $ 94417

Additional report context:
goodwill is allocated to each identified reporting unit , which is defined as an operating segment or one level below the operating segment . goodwill is not amortized , but is evaluated for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of goodwill may not be recoverable . the company completes its impairment evaluation by performing valuation analyses and considering other publicly available market information , as appropriate . the test used to identify the potential for goodwill impairment compares the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying value . an impairment charge would be recorded to the company 2019s operations for the amount , if any , in which the carrying value exceeds the fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill and no impairment was identified . the company determined that the fair value of each reporting unit ( including goodwill ) was in excess of the carrying value of the respective reporting unit . in reaching this conclusion , the fair value of each reporting unit was determined based on either a market or an income approach . under the market approach , the fair value is based on observed market data . other intangible assets the company had approximately $ 31.3 million of intangible assets other than goodwill at december 30 , 2017 and december 31 , 2016 . the intangible asset balance represents the estimated fair value of the petsense tradename , which is not subject to amortization as it has an indefinite useful life on the basis that it is expected to contribute cash flows beyond the foreseeable horizon . with respect to intangible assets , we evaluate for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable . we recognize an impairment loss only if the carrying amount is not recoverable through its discounted cash flows and measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying value and fair value . in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2017 , the company completed its annual impairment testing of intangible assets and no impairment was identified. .

Question: what was the ratio of the goodwill and other intangible assets for the company had approximately in 2017 to 2016
Answer: 0.989
Financial report context:
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 12.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher depreciation and amortization expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue . 2007 compared to 2006 net income increased $ 19.8 million primarily due to higher net revenue , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest expense , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue; column_2: $ 486.9
amount ( in millions ): attala costs; column_2: 9.9
amount ( in millions ): rider revenue; column_2: 6.0
amount ( in millions ): base revenue; column_2: 5.1
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: -2.4 ( 2.4 )
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -4.0 ( 4.0 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -2.7 ( 2.7 )
amount ( in millions ): 2008 net revenue; column_2: $ 498.8

Additional report context:
the attala costs variance is primarily due to an increase in the attala power plant costs that are recovered through the power management rider . the net income effect of this recovery in limited to a portion representing an allowed return on equity with the remainder offset by attala power plant costs in other operation and maintenance expenses , depreciation expenses , and taxes other than income taxes . the recovery of attala power plant costs is discussed further in "liquidity and capital resources - uses of capital" below . the rider revenue variance is the result of a storm damage rider that became effective in october 2007 . the establishment of this rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense for the storm reserve with no effect on net income . the base revenue variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective july 2007 . the formula rate plan filing is discussed further in "state and local rate regulation" below . the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2007. .

Question: what is the percent change in net revenue between 2007 and 2008?
Answer: 2.4%
Financial report context:
6feb201418202649 performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 2018 2018s&p 500 index 2019 2019 ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor 2019s industrials index ( 2018 2018s&p industrials index 2019 2019 ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor 2019s consumer durables & apparel index ( 2018 2018s&p consumer durables & apparel index 2019 2019 ) , from december 31 , 2008 through december 31 , 2013 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 22.77 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2008 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . $ 350.00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 200.00 $ 150.00 $ 100.00 $ 50.00 performance graph .

Financial table:
2009: masco; 2010: $ 128.21; 2011: $ 120.32; 2012: $ 102.45; 2013: $ 165.80; column_6: $ 229.59
2009: s&p 500 index; 2010: $ 125.92; 2011: $ 144.58; 2012: $ 147.60; 2013: $ 171.04; column_6: $ 225.85
2009: s&p industrials index; 2010: $ 120.19; 2011: $ 151.89; 2012: $ 150.97; 2013: $ 173.87; column_6: $ 243.73
2009: s&p consumer durables & apparel index; 2010: $ 136.29; 2011: $ 177.91; 2012: $ 191.64; 2013: $ 232.84; column_6: $ 316.28

Additional report context:
in july 2007 , our board of directors authorized the purchase of up to 50 million shares of our common stock in open-market transactions or otherwise . at december 31 , 2013 , we had remaining authorization to repurchase up to 22.6 million shares . during the first quarter of 2013 , we repurchased and retired 1.7 million shares of our common stock , for cash aggregating $ 35 million to offset the dilutive impact of the 2013 grant of 1.7 million shares of long-term stock awards . we have not purchased any shares since march 2013. .

Question: what was the percent of the remaining authorization to repurchase of the 2007 authorized the purchase at december 2013
Answer: 45.2%
Financial report context:
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties at october 30 , 2016 is set forth below: .

Financial table:
( square feet in thousands ): owned; united states: 3745; other countries: 1629; total: 5374
( square feet in thousands ): leased; united states: 564; other countries: 1103; total: 1667
( square feet in thousands ): total; united states: 4309; other countries: 2732; total: 7041

Additional report context:
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany ; tainan , taiwan ; and santa clara , california . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 280 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , massachusetts , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what percentage of company's properties are leased?
Answer: 23.7%
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) note 2 2014financial instruments ( continued ) covered by collateral , third-party flooring arrangements , or credit insurance are outstanding with the company 2019s distribution and retail channel partners . one customer accounted for approximately 11% ( 11 % ) of trade receivables as of september 29 , 2007 , while no customers accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of trade receivables as of september 30 , 2006 . the following table summarizes the activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts ( in millions ) : september 29 , september 30 , september 24 , 2007 2006 2005 .

Financial table:
september 29 2007: beginning allowance balance; september 30 2006: $ 52; september 24 2005: $ 46; column_4: $ 47
september 29 2007: charged to costs and expenses; september 30 2006: 12; september 24 2005: 17; column_4: 8
september 29 2007: deductions; september 30 2006: -17 ( 17 ); september 24 2005: -11 ( 11 ); column_4: -9 ( 9 )
september 29 2007: ending allowance balance; september 30 2006: $ 47; september 24 2005: $ 52; column_4: $ 46

Additional report context:
vendor non-trade receivables the company has non-trade receivables from certain of its manufacturing vendors resulting from the sale of raw material components to these manufacturing vendors who manufacture sub-assemblies or assemble final products for the company . the company purchases these raw material components directly from suppliers . these non-trade receivables , which are included in the consolidated balance sheets in other current assets , totaled $ 2.4 billion and $ 1.6 billion as of september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , respectively . the company does not reflect the sale of these components in net sales and does not recognize any profits on these sales until the products are sold through to the end customer at which time the profit is recognized as a reduction of cost of sales . derivative financial instruments the company uses derivatives to partially offset its business exposure to foreign exchange risk . foreign currency forward and option contracts are used to offset the foreign exchange risk on certain existing assets and liabilities and to hedge the foreign exchange risk on expected future cash flows on certain forecasted revenue and cost of sales . the company 2019s accounting policies for these instruments are based on whether the instruments are designated as hedge or non-hedge instruments . the company records all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. .

Question: what was the change in non-trade receivables , included in other current assets , between september 29 , 2007 and september 30 , 2006 , in billions?
Answer: 0.8
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2015 annual report 67 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of 87 financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2010: $ 100.00; 2011: $ 80.03; 2012: $ 108.98; 2013: $ 148.98; 2014: $ 163.71; 2015: $ 177.40
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2010: 100.00; 2011: 76.82; 2012: 102.19; 2013: 140.77; 2014: 153.96; 2015: 154.71
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2010: 100.00; 2011: 82.94; 2012: 106.78; 2013: 144.79; 2014: 166.76; 2015: 164.15
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2010: 100.00; 2011: 102.11; 2012: 118.44; 2013: 156.78; 2014: 178.22; 2015: 180.67

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the s&p financial index?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
state street corporation | 52 shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five-year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2012 . it also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available , capitalization-weighted index , comprised of 67 of the standard & poor 2019s 500 companies , representing 27 diversified financial services companies , 23 insurance companies , and 17 banking companies . the kbw bank index is a modified cap-weighted index consisting of 24 exchange-listed stocks , representing national money center banks and leading regional institutions. .

Financial table:
2012: state street corporation; 2013: $ 100; 2014: $ 159; 2015: $ 172; 2016: $ 148; 2017: $ 178; column_7: $ 227
2012: s&p 500 index; 2013: 100; 2014: 132; 2015: 151; 2016: 153; 2017: 171; column_7: 208
2012: s&p financial index; 2013: 100; 2014: 136; 2015: 156; 2016: 154; 2017: 189; column_7: 230
2012: kbw bank index; 2013: 100; 2014: 138; 2015: 151; 2016: 151; 2017: 195; column_7: 231

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment is s&p500 index from 2012 to 2015?
Answer: 53%
Financial report context:
risks relating to our business fluctuations in the financial markets could result in investment losses . prolonged and severe disruptions in the overall public debt and equity markets , such as occurred during 2008 , could result in significant realized and unrealized losses in our investment portfolio . although financial markets have significantly improved since 2008 , they could deteriorate in the future . there could also be disruption in individual market sectors , such as occurred in the energy sector in recent years . such declines in the financial markets could result in significant realized and unrealized losses on investments and could have a material adverse impact on our results of operations , equity , business and insurer financial strength and debt ratings . our results could be adversely affected by catastrophic events . we are exposed to unpredictable catastrophic events , including weather-related and other natural catastrophes , as well as acts of terrorism . any material reduction in our operating results caused by the occurrence of one or more catastrophes could inhibit our ability to pay dividends or to meet our interest and principal payment obligations . by way of illustration , during the past five calendar years , pre-tax catastrophe losses , net of contract specific reinsurance but before cessions under corporate reinsurance programs , were as follows: .

Financial table:
calendar year:: ( dollars in millions )
calendar year:: 2016; pre-tax catastrophe losses: $ 301.2
calendar year:: 2015; pre-tax catastrophe losses: 53.8
calendar year:: 2014; pre-tax catastrophe losses: 56.3
calendar year:: 2013; pre-tax catastrophe losses: 194.0
calendar year:: 2012; pre-tax catastrophe losses: 410.0

Additional report context:
our losses from future catastrophic events could exceed our projections . we use projections of possible losses from future catastrophic events of varying types and magnitudes as a strategic underwriting tool . we use these loss projections to estimate our potential catastrophe losses in certain geographic areas and decide on the placement of retrocessional coverage or other actions to limit the extent of potential losses in a given geographic area . these loss projections are approximations , reliant on a mix of quantitative and qualitative processes , and actual losses may exceed the projections by a material amount , resulting in a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the pre-tax catastrophe losses from 2015 to 2016
Answer: 460%