alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
entergy new orleans , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis entergy new orleans' receivables from the money pool were as follows as of december 31 for each of the following years: .

Financial table:
2004: ( in thousands ); 2003: ( in thousands ); 2002: ( in thousands ); 2001: ( in thousands )
2004: $ 1413; 2003: $ 1783; 2002: $ 3500; 2001: $ 9208

Additional report context:
money pool activity provided $ 0.4 million of entergy new orleans' operating cash flow in 2004 , provided $ 1.7 million in 2003 , and provided $ 5.7 million in 2002 . see note 4 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for a description of the money pool . investing activities net cash used in investing activities decreased $ 15.5 million in 2004 primarily due to capital expenditures related to a turbine inspection project at a fossil plant in 2003 and decreased customer service spending . net cash used in investing activities increased $ 23.2 million in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to the maturity of $ 14.9 million of other temporary investments in 2002 and increased construction expenditures due to increased customer service spending . financing activities net cash used in financing activities increased $ 7.0 million in 2004 primarily due to the costs and expenses related to refinancing $ 75 million of long-term debt in 2004 and an increase of $ 2.2 million in common stock dividends paid . net cash used in financing activities increased $ 1.5 million in 2003 primarily due to additional common stock dividends paid of $ 2.2 million . in july 2003 , entergy new orleans issued $ 30 million of 3.875% ( 3.875 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2008 and $ 70 million of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) series first mortgage bonds due august 2013 . the proceeds from these issuances were used to redeem , prior to maturity , $ 30 million of 7% ( 7 % ) series first mortgage bonds due july 2008 , $ 40 million of 8% ( 8 % ) series bonds due march 2006 , and $ 30 million of 6.65% ( 6.65 % ) series first mortgage bonds due march 2004 . the issuances and redemptions are not shown on the cash flow statement because the proceeds from the issuances were placed in a trust for use in the redemptions and never held as cash by entergy new orleans . see note 5 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements for details on long- term debt . uses of capital entergy new orleans requires capital resources for : 2022 construction and other capital investments ; 2022 debt and preferred stock maturities ; 2022 working capital purposes , including the financing of fuel and purchased power costs ; and 2022 dividend and interest payments. .

Question: what the provisions to operating cash flow from money pool as a percentage of receivables from the money pool in 2003?
Answer: 95.4%
Financial report context:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 company for an aggregate proceeds of approximately $ 234 million . the company recognized a gain on disposal of $ 6 million , net of tax , during the year ended december 31 , 2010 . ras laffan was previously reported in the asia generation segment . 23 . acquisitions and dispositions acquisitions dpl 2014on november 28 , 2011 , aes completed its acquisition of 100% ( 100 % ) of the common stock of dpl for approximately $ 3.5 billion , pursuant to the terms and conditions of a definitive agreement ( the 201cmerger agreement 201d ) dated april 19 , 2011 . dpl serves over 500000 customers , primarily west central ohio , through its operating subsidiaries dp&l and dpl energy resources ( 201cdpler 201d ) . additionally , dpl operates over 3800 mw of power generation facilities and provides competitive retail energy services to residential , commercial , industrial and governmental customers . the acquisition strengthens the company 2019s u.s . utility operations by expanding in the midwest and pjm , a regional transmission organization serving several eastern states as part of the eastern interconnection . the company expects to benefit from the regional scale provided by indianapolis power & light company , its nearby integrated utility business in indiana . aes funded the aggregate purchase consideration through a combination of the following : 2022 the proceeds from a $ 1.05 billion term loan obtained in may 2011 ; 2022 the proceeds from a private offering of $ 1.0 billion notes in june 2011 ; 2022 temporary borrowings of $ 251 million under its revolving credit facility ; and 2022 the proceeds from private offerings of $ 450 million aggregate principal amount of 6.50% ( 6.50 % ) senior notes due 2016 and $ 800 million aggregate principal amount of 7.25% ( 7.25 % ) senior notes due 2021 ( collectively , the 201cnotes 201d ) in october 2011 by dolphin subsidiary ii , inc . ( 201cdolphin ii 201d ) , a wholly-owned special purpose indirect subsidiary of aes , which was merged into dpl upon the completion of acquisition . the fair value of the consideration paid for dpl was as follows ( in millions ) : .

Financial table:
agreed enterprise value: less : fair value of assumed long-term debt outstanding net; $ 4719: -1255 ( 1255 )
agreed enterprise value: cash consideration paid to dpl 2019s common stockholders; $ 4719: 3464
agreed enterprise value: add : cash paid for outstanding stock-based awards; $ 4719: 19
agreed enterprise value: total cash consideration paid; $ 4719: $ 3483

Additional report context:
.

Question: how much of the dpl purchase price was funded by existing credit facilities as opposed to new borrowing?
Answer: 7.2%
Financial report context:
3 . discontinued operations during the second quarter of 2012 , the board of directors authorized the sale of our homecare business , which had previously been reported as part of the merchant gases operating segment . this business has been accounted for as a discontinued operation . in the third quarter of 2012 , we sold the majority of our homecare business to the linde group for sale proceeds of 20ac590 million ( $ 777 ) and recognized a gain of $ 207.4 ( $ 150.3 after-tax , or $ .70 per share ) . the sale proceeds included 20ac110 million ( $ 144 ) that was contingent on the outcome of certain retender arrangements . these proceeds were reflected in payables and accrued liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet as of 30 september 2013 . based on the outcome of the retenders , we were contractually required to return proceeds to the linde group . in the fourth quarter of 2014 , we made a payment to settle this liability and recognized a gain of $ 1.5 . during the third quarter of 2012 , an impairment charge of $ 33.5 ( $ 29.5 after-tax , or $ .14 per share ) was recorded to write down the remaining business , which was primarily in the united kingdom and ireland , to its estimated net realizable value . in the fourth quarter of 2013 , an additional charge of $ 18.7 ( $ 13.6 after-tax , or $ .06 per share ) was recorded to update our estimate of the net realizable value . in the first quarter of 2014 , we sold the remaining portion of the homecare business for a36.1 million ( $ 9.8 ) and recorded a gain on sale of $ 2.4 . we entered into an operations guarantee related to the obligations under certain homecare contracts assigned in connection with the transaction . refer to note 16 , commitments and contingencies , for additional information . the results of discontinued operations are summarized below: .

Financial table:
2014: sales; 2013: $ 8.5; 2012: $ 52.3; column_4: $ 258.0
2014: income before taxes; 2013: $ .7; 2012: $ 3.8; column_4: $ 68.1
2014: income tax provision; 2013: 2014; 2012: .2; column_4: 20.8
2014: income from operations of discontinued operations; 2013: .7; 2012: 3.6; column_4: 47.3
2014: gain ( loss ) on sale of business and impairment/write-down net of tax; 2013: 3.9; 2012: -13.6 ( 13.6 ); column_4: 120.8
2014: income ( loss ) from discontinued operations net of tax; 2013: $ 4.6; 2012: $ -10.0 ( 10.0 ); column_4: $ 168.1

Additional report context:
the assets and liabilities classified as discontinued operations for the homecare business at 30 september 2013 consisted of $ 2.5 in trade receivables , net , and $ 2.4 in payables and accrued liabilities . as of 30 september 2014 , no assets or liabilities were classified as discontinued operations. .

Question: considering the year 2014 , what is the percentage of income from operations of discontinued operations concerning income from discontinued operations net of tax?
Answer: 15.21%
Financial report context:
22 2016 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2016 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2011: jkhy; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 116.62; 2014: 161.33; 2015: 206.53; 2016: 228.24; column_7: 312.11
2011: peer group; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 107.65; 2014: 126.89; 2015: 174.28; 2016: 219.46; column_7: 251.24
2011: s&p 500; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 105.45; 2014: 127.17; 2015: 158.46; 2016: 170.22; column_7: 177.02

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2011 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. , bottomline technology , inc. , broadridge financial solutions , cardtronics , inc. , convergys corp. , corelogic , inc. , dst systems , inc. , euronet worldwide , inc. , fair isaac corp. , fidelity national information services , inc. , fiserv , inc. , global payments , inc. , moneygram international , inc. , ss&c technologies holdings , inc. , total systems services , inc. , tyler technologies , inc. , verifone systems , inc. , and wex , inc. . heartland payment systems , inc . was removed from the peer group as it merged with global payments , inc . in april 2016. .

Question: what was the percentage performance growth in the 5 year cumulative total return of peer group from 2014 to 2016
Answer: 25.9%
Financial report context:
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) .

Financial table:
lilly: dec-13; peer group: $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
lilly: dec-14; peer group: $ 139.75; s&p 500: $ 114.39; column_4: $ 113.69
lilly: dec-15; peer group: $ 175.21; s&p 500: $ 116.56; column_4: $ 115.26
lilly: dec-16; peer group: $ 157.03; s&p 500: $ 112.80; column_4: $ 129.05
lilly: dec-17; peer group: $ 185.04; s&p 500: $ 128.90; column_4: $ 157.22
lilly: dec-18; peer group: $ 259.88; s&p 500: $ 136.56; column_4: $ 150.33

Additional report context:
( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage return for lilly compared to the s&p 500 for the five years ended dec-18?
Answer: 109.55%
Financial report context:
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index on september 30 , 2006 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index and the dow jones us technology index sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07sep-06 sep-11 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology *$ 100 invested on 9/30/06 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2011 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Financial table:
september 30 2006: apple inc .; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 199; september 30 2009: $ 148; september 30 2010: $ 241; september 30 2011: $ 369; column_7: $ 495
september 30 2006: s&p 500; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 116; september 30 2009: $ 91; september 30 2010: $ 85; september 30 2011: $ 93; column_7: $ 94
september 30 2006: s&p computer hardware; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 148; september 30 2009: $ 124; september 30 2010: $ 147; september 30 2011: $ 174; column_7: $ 197
september 30 2006: dow jones us technology; september 30 2007: $ 100; september 30 2008: $ 123; september 30 2009: $ 94; september 30 2010: $ 104; september 30 2011: $ 117; column_7: $ 120

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the cumulative percentage return for the four years ended september 30 , 2010 for apple inc.?
Answer: 269%
Financial report context:
instruments at fair value and to recognize the effective and ineffective portions of the cash flow hedges . ( 2 ) for the year ended december 31 , 2000 , earnings available to common stockholders includes reductions of $ 2371 of preferred stock dividends and $ 16266 for the redemption of pca 2019s 123 20448% ( 20448 % ) preferred stock . ( 3 ) on october 13 , 2003 , pca announced its intention to begin paying a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.15 per share , or $ 0.60 per share annually , on its common stock . the first quarterly dividend of $ 0.15 per share was paid on january 15 , 2004 to shareholders of record as of december 15 , 2003 . pca did not declare any dividends on its common stock in 2000 - 2002 . ( 4 ) total long-term obligations include long-term debt , short-term debt and the current maturities of long-term debt . item 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations the following discussion of historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this report . overview on april 12 , 1999 , pca acquired the containerboard and corrugated products business of pactiv corporation ( the 201cgroup 201d ) , formerly known as tenneco packaging inc. , a wholly owned subsidiary of tenneco , inc . the group operated prior to april 12 , 1999 as a division of pactiv , and not as a separate , stand-alone entity . from its formation in january 1999 and through the closing of the acquisition on april 12 , 1999 , pca did not have any significant operations . the april 12 , 1999 acquisition was accounted for using historical values for the contributed assets . purchase accounting was not applied because , under the applicable accounting guidance , a change of control was deemed not to have occurred as a result of the participating veto rights held by pactiv after the closing of the transactions under the terms of the stockholders agreement entered into in connection with the transactions . results of operations year ended december 31 , 2004 compared to year ended december 31 , 2003 the historical results of operations of pca for the years ended december , 31 2004 and 2003 are set forth the below : for the year ended december 31 , ( in millions ) 2004 2003 change .

Financial table:
( in millions ): net sales; 2004: $ 1890.1; 2003: $ 1735.5; change: $ 154.6
( in millions ): income before interest and taxes; 2004: $ 140.5; 2003: $ 96.9; change: $ 43.6
( in millions ): interest expense net; 2004: -29.6 ( 29.6 ); 2003: -121.8 ( 121.8 ); change: 92.2
( in millions ): income ( loss ) before taxes; 2004: 110.9; 2003: -24.9 ( 24.9 ); change: 135.8
( in millions ): ( provision ) benefit for income taxes; 2004: -42.2 ( 42.2 ); 2003: 10.5; change: -52.7 ( 52.7 )
( in millions ): net income ( loss ); 2004: $ 68.7; 2003: $ -14.4 ( 14.4 ); change: $ 83.1

Additional report context:
.

Question: was interest expense net in 2004 greater than ( provision ) benefit for income taxes?
Answer: no
Financial report context:
table of contents part ii , item 8 schlumberger limited ( schlumberger n.v. , incorporated in the netherlands antilles ) and subsidiary companies shares of common stock issued treasury shares outstanding .

Financial table:
issued: balance january 1 2001; in treasury: 667085793; shares outstanding: -94361099 ( 94361099 ); column_4: 572724694
issued: employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 1752833; column_4: 1752833
issued: shares granted to directors; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 4800; column_4: 4800
issued: shares sold to optionees; in treasury: 8385; shares outstanding: 1399686; column_4: 1408071
issued: balance december 31 2001; in treasury: 667094178; shares outstanding: -91203780 ( 91203780 ); column_4: 575890398
issued: employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 2677842; column_4: 2677842
issued: shares granted to directors; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 3500; column_4: 3500
issued: shares sold to optionees; in treasury: 10490; shares outstanding: 2243400; column_4: 2253890
issued: acquisition of technoguide; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 1347485; column_4: 1347485
issued: balance december 31 2002; in treasury: 667104668; shares outstanding: -84931553 ( 84931553 ); column_4: 582173115
issued: employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 2464088; column_4: 2464088
issued: shares granted to directors; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 3500; column_4: 3500
issued: shares sold to optionees; in treasury: 1320; shares outstanding: 1306305; column_4: 1307625
issued: balance december 31 2003; in treasury: 667105988; shares outstanding: -81157660 ( 81157660 ); column_4: 585948328

Additional report context:
see the notes to consolidated financial statements 39 / slb 2003 form 10-k .

Question: what was amount of shares issued to directors during the period?
Answer: 11800
Financial report context:
value , which may be maturity , the company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of december 31 , 2005 and 2004 . gross realized gains and losses for 2005 were $ 15000 and $ 75000 , respectively . gross realized gains and losses for 2004 were $ 628000 and $ 205000 , respectively . gross realized gains for 2003 were $ 1249000 . there were no gross realized losses for 2003 . maturities stated are effective maturities . f . restricted cash at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 , the company held $ 41482000 and $ 49847000 , respectively , in restricted cash . at december 31 , 2005 and 2004 the balance was held in deposit with certain banks predominantly to collateralize conditional stand-by letters of credit in the names of the company's landlords pursuant to certain operating lease agreements . g . property and equipment property and equipment consist of the following at december 31 ( in thousands ) : depreciation expense for the years ended december 31 , 2005 , 2004 and 2003 was $ 26307000 , $ 28353000 and $ 27988000 respectively . in 2005 and 2004 , the company wrote off certain assets that were fully depreciated and no longer utilized . there was no effect on the company's net property and equipment . additionally , the company wrote off or sold certain assets that were not fully depreciated . the net loss on disposal of those assets was $ 344000 for 2005 and $ 43000 for 2004 . h . investments in accordance with the company's policy , as outlined in note b , "accounting policies" the company assessed its investment in altus pharmaceuticals , inc . ( "altus" ) , which it accounts for using the cost method , and determined that there had not been any adjustments to the fair values of that investment which would indicate a decrease in its fair value below the carrying value that would require the company to write down the investment basis of the asset , as of december 31 , 2005 and december 31 , 2004 . the company's cost basis carrying value in its outstanding equity and warrants of altus was $ 18863000 at december 31 , 2005 and 2004. .

Financial table:
2005: furniture and equipment; 2004: $ 98387; column_3: $ 90893
2005: leasehold improvements; 2004: 66318; column_3: 65294
2005: computers; 2004: 18971; column_3: 18421
2005: software; 2004: 18683; column_3: 16411
2005: total property and equipment gross; 2004: 202359; column_3: 191019
2005: less accumulated depreciation and amortization; 2004: 147826; column_3: 126794
2005: total property and equipment net; 2004: $ 54533; column_3: $ 64225

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the percent change in net loss on disposal of assets between 2004 and 2005?
Answer: 700%