alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables citi has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: receivables from customers; december 31 , 2017: $ 19215; december 31 , 2016: $ 10374
in millions of dollars: receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2017: 19169; december 31 , 2016: 18513
in millions of dollars: total brokerage receivables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2017: $ 38384; december 31 , 2016: $ 28887
in millions of dollars: payables to customers; december 31 , 2017: $ 38741; december 31 , 2016: $ 37237
in millions of dollars: payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2017: 22601; december 31 , 2016: 19915
in millions of dollars: total brokerage payables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2017: $ 61342; december 31 , 2016: $ 57152

Additional report context:
payables to brokers , dealers and clearing organizations 22601 19915 total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 61342 $ 57152 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker- dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: at december 312017 what was the ratio of the total brokerage receivables to the total brokerage payables
Answer: 0.63
Financial report context:
stock performance graph comcast the graph below compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on comcast 2019s class a common stock during the five years ended december 31 , 2015 with the cumulative total returns on the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and with a select peer group consisting of us and other companies engaged in the cable , communications and media industries . this peer group consists of us , as well as cablevision systems corporation ( class a ) , dish network corporation ( class a ) , directv inc . ( included through july 24 , 2015 , the date of acquisition by at&t corp. ) and time warner cable inc . ( the 201ccable subgroup 201d ) , and time warner inc. , walt disney company , viacom inc . ( class b ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . ( class a ) , and cbs corporation ( class b ) ( the 201cmedia subgroup 201d ) . the peer group was constructed as a composite peer group in which the cable subgroup is weighted 63% ( 63 % ) and the media subgroup is weighted 37% ( 37 % ) based on the respective revenue of our cable communications and nbcuniversal segments . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in our class a common stock and in each of the following indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 12/1412/1312/1212/10 12/15 comcast class a s&p 500 peer group index .

Financial table:
2011: comcast class a; 2012: $ 110; 2013: $ 177; 2014: $ 250; 2015: $ 282; column_6: $ 279
2011: s&p 500 stock index; 2012: $ 102; 2013: $ 118; 2014: $ 156; 2015: $ 177; column_6: $ 180
2011: peer group index; 2012: $ 110; 2013: $ 157; 2014: $ 231; 2015: $ 267; column_6: $ 265

Additional report context:
nbcuniversal nbcuniversal is a wholly owned subsidiary of nbcuniversal holdings and there is no market for its equity securities . 39 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: what was the percentage 5 year cumulative total return for comcast class a stock for the year ended 2015?
Answer: 179%
Financial report context:
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .

Financial table:
2012: 2013; $ 1807885: 1718403
2012: 2014; $ 1807885: 1609279
2012: 2015; $ 1807885: 1425804
2012: 2016; $ 1807885: 1232154
2012: thereafter; $ 1807885: 6045584

Additional report context:
these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .

Question: did future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , decrease from 2012 to 2013?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
3 . dividends from subsidiaries and affiliates cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method were as follows ( in millions ) : .

Financial table:
2003: subsidiaries; 2002: $ 807; 2001: $ 771; column_4: $ 1038
2003: affiliates; 2002: 43; 2001: 44; column_4: 21

Additional report context:
4 . guarantees and letters of credit guarantees 2014in connection with certain of its project financing , acquisition , and power purchase agreements , the company has expressly undertaken limited obligations and commitments , most of which will only be effective or will be terminated upon the occurrence of future events . these obligations and commitments , excluding those collateralized by letter of credit and other obligations discussed below , were limited as of december 31 , 2003 , by the terms of the agreements , to an aggregate of approximately $ 515 million representing 55 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 100 million . of this amount , $ 147 million represents credit enhancements for non-recourse debt , and $ 38 million commitments to fund its equity in projects currently under development or in construction . letters of credit 2014at december 31 , 2003 , the company had $ 89 million in letters of credit outstanding representing 9 agreements with individual exposures ranging from less than $ 1 million up to $ 36 million , which operate to guarantee performance relating to certain project development and construction activities and subsidiary operations . the company pays a letter of credit fee ranging from 0.5% ( 0.5 % ) to 5.00% ( 5.00 % ) per annum on the outstanding amounts . in addition , the company had $ 4 million in surety bonds outstanding at december 31 , 2003. .

Question: what was the average dividend or cash dividends received from consolidated subsidiaries and from affiliates accounted for by the equity method in millions in 2003?
Answer: 18.8
Financial report context:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 30 , 2011 through october 30 , 2016 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 30 , 2011 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/30/11 in stock or 10/31/11 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2016 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
10/30/2011: applied materials; 10/28/2012: 100.00; 10/27/2013: 86.93; 10/26/2014: 148.68; 10/25/2015: 179.96; 10/30/2016: 143.74; column_7: 255.27
10/30/2011: s&p 500 index; 10/28/2012: 100.00; 10/27/2013: 115.21; 10/26/2014: 146.52; 10/25/2015: 171.82; 10/30/2016: 180.75; column_7: 188.90
10/30/2011: rdg semiconductor composite index; 10/28/2012: 100.00; 10/27/2013: 96.65; 10/26/2014: 127.68; 10/25/2015: 160.86; 10/30/2016: 154.90; column_7: 191.65

Additional report context:
dividends during each of fiscal 2016 , 2015 , and 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends in the amount of $ 0.10 per share . applied currently anticipates that cash dividends will continue to be paid on a quarterly basis , although the declaration of any future cash dividend is at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination by the board of directors that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in applied materials in 2011 and sold in 2012?
Answer: -130700
Financial report context:
note 9 2014 benefit plans the company has defined benefit pension plans covering certain employees in the united states and certain international locations . postretirement healthcare and life insurance benefits provided to qualifying domestic retirees as well as other postretirement benefit plans in international countries are not material . the measurement date used for the company 2019s employee benefit plans is september 30 . effective january 1 , 2018 , the legacy u.s . pension plan was frozen to limit the participation of employees who are hired or re-hired by the company , or who transfer employment to the company , on or after january 1 , net pension cost for the years ended september 30 included the following components: .

Financial table:
( millions of dollars ): service cost; pension plans 2019: $ 134; pension plans 2018: $ 136; pension plans 2017: $ 110
( millions of dollars ): interest cost; pension plans 2019: 107; pension plans 2018: 90; pension plans 2017: 61
( millions of dollars ): expected return on plan assets; pension plans 2019: ( 180 ); pension plans 2018: ( 154 ); pension plans 2017: ( 112 )
( millions of dollars ): amortization of prior service credit; pension plans 2019: ( 13 ); pension plans 2018: ( 13 ); pension plans 2017: ( 14 )
( millions of dollars ): amortization of loss; pension plans 2019: 78; pension plans 2018: 78; pension plans 2017: 92
( millions of dollars ): settlements; pension plans 2019: 10; pension plans 2018: 2; pension plans 2017: 2014
( millions of dollars ): net pension cost; pension plans 2019: $ 135; pension plans 2018: $ 137; pension plans 2017: $ 138
( millions of dollars ): net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans; pension plans 2019: $ 32; pension plans 2018: $ 34; pension plans 2017: $ 43

Additional report context:
net pension cost included in the preceding table that is attributable to international plans $ 32 $ 34 $ 43 the amounts provided above for amortization of prior service credit and amortization of loss represent the reclassifications of prior service credits and net actuarial losses that were recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) in prior periods . the settlement losses recorded in 2019 and 2018 primarily included lump sum benefit payments associated with the company 2019s u.s . supplemental pension plan . the company recognizes pension settlements when payments from the supplemental plan exceed the sum of service and interest cost components of net periodic pension cost associated with this plan for the fiscal year . as further discussed in note 2 , upon adopting an accounting standard update on october 1 , 2018 , all components of the company 2019s net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs , aside from service cost , are recorded to other income ( expense ) , net on its consolidated statements of income , for all periods presented . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) becton , dickinson and company .

Question: in 2017 what was the ratio of the pension service cost to the interest cost
Answer: 1.8
Financial report context:
sources and uses of cash ( in millions ) in summary , our cash flows for each period were as follows : years ended ( in millions ) dec 29 , dec 30 , dec 31 .

Financial table:
years ended ( in millions ): net cash provided by operating activities; dec 292018: $ 29432; dec 302017: $ 22110; dec 312016: $ 21808
years ended ( in millions ): net cash used for investing activities; dec 292018: -11239 ( 11239 ); dec 302017: -15762 ( 15762 ); dec 312016: -25817 ( 25817 )
years ended ( in millions ): net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities; dec 292018: -18607 ( 18607 ); dec 302017: -8475 ( 8475 ); dec 312016: -5739 ( 5739 )
years ended ( in millions ): net increase ( decrease ) in cash and cash equivalents; dec 292018: $ -414 ( 414 ); dec 302017: $ -2127 ( 2127 ); dec 312016: $ -9748 ( 9748 )

Additional report context:
md&a consolidated results and analysis 40 .

Question: as of december 292017 what was the percent of the net cash provided by ( used for ) financing activities to the net cash provided by operating activities
Answer: 38.33%
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2010; the priceline group inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2011; the priceline group inc .: 117.06; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.53; s&p 500index: 102.11; rdg internetcomposite: 102.11
measurement pointdecember 31: 2012; the priceline group inc .: 155.27; nasdaqcomposite index: 116.92; s&p 500index: 118.45; rdg internetcomposite: 122.23
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; the priceline group inc .: 290.93; nasdaqcomposite index: 166.19; s&p 500index: 156.82; rdg internetcomposite: 199.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; the priceline group inc .: 285.37; nasdaqcomposite index: 188.78; s&p 500index: 178.29; rdg internetcomposite: 195.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; the priceline group inc .: 319.10; nasdaqcomposite index: 199.95; s&p 500index: 180.75; rdg internetcomposite: 267.25

Additional report context:
.

Question: at the measurement point december 312015 what was ratio of the the priceline group inc.to the nasdaq composite index
Answer: 1.6
Financial report context:
tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow are considered non-gaap financial measures . we are required to provide these financial metrics by the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , and we have included them below because we consider the indentures for these notes to be material agreements , the covenants related to tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow to be material terms of the indentures , and information about compliance with such covenants to be material to an investor 2019s understanding of our financial results and the impact of those results on our liquidity . the following table presents tower cash flow , adjusted consolidated cash flow and non-tower cash flow for the company and its restricted subsidiaries , as defined in the indentures for the applicable notes ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008: consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008; $ 188449: 726954
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008: less : tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008; $ 188449: -741565 ( 741565 )
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008: plus : four times tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008; $ 188449: 753798
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008: adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008; $ 188449: 739187
tower cash flow for the three months ended december 31 2008: non-tower cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 2008; $ 188449: $ -14611 ( 14611 )

Additional report context:
.

Question: what portion of the adjusted consolidated cash flow for the twelve months ended december 31 , 2008 is related to tower cash flow?
Answer: 102.0%
Financial report context:
intel corporation notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) the aggregate fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.5 billion ( $ 1.1 billion in 2014 and $ 1.0 billion in 2013 ) , which represents the market value of our common stock on the date that the rsus vested . the grant-date fair value of awards that vested in 2015 was $ 1.1 billion ( $ 949 million in 2014 and $ 899 million in 2013 ) . the number of rsus vested includes shares of common stock that we withheld on behalf of employees to satisfy the minimum statutory tax withholding requirements . rsus that are expected to vest are net of estimated future forfeitures . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 1.8 billion in unrecognized compensation costs related to rsus granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of 1.2 years . stock option awards as of december 26 , 2015 , options outstanding that have vested and are expected to vest were as follows : number of options ( in millions ) weighted average exercise weighted average remaining contractual ( in years ) aggregate intrinsic ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
number ofoptions ( in millions ): vested; weightedaverageexerciseprice: 43.8; weightedaverageremainingcontractualterm ( in years ): $ 21.07; aggregateintrinsicvalue ( in millions ): 1.8; column_5: $ 609
number ofoptions ( in millions ): expected to vest; weightedaverageexerciseprice: 9.6; weightedaverageremainingcontractualterm ( in years ): $ 24.07; aggregateintrinsicvalue ( in millions ): 4.1; column_5: $ 104
number ofoptions ( in millions ): total; weightedaverageexerciseprice: 53.4; weightedaverageremainingcontractualterm ( in years ): $ 21.61; aggregateintrinsicvalue ( in millions ): 2.2; column_5: $ 713

Additional report context:
aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between the exercise price and $ 34.98 , the closing price of our common stock on december 24 , 2015 , as reported on the nasdaq global select market , for all in-the-money options outstanding . options outstanding that are expected to vest are net of estimated future option forfeitures . options with a fair value of $ 42 million completed vesting in 2015 ( $ 68 million in 2014 and $ 186 million in 2013 ) . as of december 26 , 2015 , there was $ 13 million in unrecognized compensation costs related to stock options granted under our equity incentive plans . we expect to recognize those costs over a weighted average period of approximately eight months. .

Question: what percentage of stock option awards are expected to vest as of december 26 , 2015?
Answer: 18%
Financial report context:
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s ( s&p ) mid cap 400 index and the russell 1000 index , both of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

Financial table:
company/index: a . o . smith corporation; baseperiod 12/31/11: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/12: 159.5; baseperiod 12/31/13: 275.8; baseperiod 12/31/14: 292.0; baseperiod 12/31/15: 401.0; 12/31/16: 501.4
company/index: s&p mid cap 400 index; baseperiod 12/31/11: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/12: 117.9; baseperiod 12/31/13: 157.4; baseperiod 12/31/14: 172.8; baseperiod 12/31/15: 169.0; 12/31/16: 204.1
company/index: russell 1000 index; baseperiod 12/31/11: 100.0; baseperiod 12/31/12: 116.4; baseperiod 12/31/13: 155.0; baseperiod 12/31/14: 175.4; baseperiod 12/31/15: 177.0; 12/31/16: 198.4

Additional report context:
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 smith ( a o ) corp s&p midcap 400 index russell 1000 index .

Question: what was the difference in total return for the five year period ended 12/31/16 between a . o . smith corporation and the russell 1000 index?
Answer: 98.4%