alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
table of contents rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 645 million , $ 488 million and $ 338 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2013 , are as follows ( in millions ) : other commitments as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , which consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . v . samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics co. , ltd and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . on march 1 , 2013 , the district court upheld $ 599 million of the jury 2019s award and ordered a new trial as to the remainder . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment , partial re-trial and appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its results of operations . virnetx , inc . v . apple inc . et al . on august 11 , 2010 , virnetx , inc . filed an action against the company alleging that certain of its products infringed on four patents relating to network communications technology . on november 6 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict against the company , and awarded damages of $ 368 million . the company is challenging the verdict , believes it has valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time. .

Financial table:
2014: 2015; $ 610: 613
2014: 2016; $ 610: 587
2014: 2017; $ 610: 551
2014: 2018; $ 610: 505
2014: thereafter; $ 610: 1855
2014: total minimum lease payments; $ 610: $ 4721

Additional report context:
.

Question: of the total minimum lease payments , what percentage were due after 2018?
Answer: 39.3%
Financial report context:
celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2014 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

Financial table:
period: october 1 - 31 2014; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 192580; averageprice paidper share: $ 58.02; total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: 164800; approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): $ 490000000
period: november 1 - 30 2014; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 468128; averageprice paidper share: $ 59.25; total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: 468128; approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): $ 463000000
period: december 1 - 31 2014; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 199796; averageprice paidper share: $ 60.78; total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: 190259; approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): $ 451000000
period: total; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 860504; averageprice paidper share: 823187

Additional report context:
___________________________ ( 1 ) includes 27780 and 9537 for october and december 2014 , respectively , related to shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 1.4 billion of our common stock since february 2008 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information . performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed "soliciting material" or to be "filed" with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . comparison of cumulative total return .

Question: in 2014 for the period october 1 - 31 2014 what was the ratio of the shares purchased as part of publicly announced program to the total number of shares purchased
Answer: 0.86
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements as of december 31 , 2008 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2009; column_2: $ 47760
amount ( in thousands ): 2010; column_2: 48569
amount ( in thousands ): 2011; column_2: 49437
amount ( in thousands ): 2012; column_2: 49959
amount ( in thousands ): 2013; column_2: 50546
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: 103890
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 350161
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 54857
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 295304

Additional report context:
.

Question: what portion of the total minimum lease payments is related to interest?
Answer: 15.7%
Financial report context:
entergy gulf states , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 1110.1
( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 26.7
( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: 13.0
( in millions ): summer capacity charges; column_2: 5.5
( in millions ): price applied to unbilled sales; column_2: 4.8
( in millions ): fuel recovery revenues; column_2: -14.2 ( 14.2 )
( in millions ): other; column_2: 3.9
( in millions ): 2004 net revenue; column_2: $ 1149.8

Additional report context:
the volume/weather variance resulted primarily from an increase of 1179 gwh in electricity usage in the industrial sector . billed usage also increased a total of 291 gwh in the residential , commercial , and governmental sectors . the increase in net wholesale revenue is primarily due to an increase in sales volume to municipal and co-op customers . summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . the price applied to unbilled sales variance resulted primarily from an increase in the fuel price applied to unbilled sales . fuel recovery revenues represent an under-recovery of fuel charges that are recovered in base rates . entergy gulf states recorded $ 22.6 million of provisions in 2004 for potential rate refunds . these provisions are not included in the net revenue table above because they are more than offset by provisions recorded in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase of $ 187.8 million in fuel cost recovery revenues as a result of higher fuel rates in both the louisiana and texas jurisdictions . the increases in volume/weather and wholesale revenue , discussed above , also contributed to the increase . fuel and purchased power expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 increased recovery of deferred fuel costs due to higher fuel rates ; 2022 increases in the market prices of natural gas , coal , and purchased power ; and 2022 an increase in electricity usage , discussed above . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these charges began in june 2002 and ended in may 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy gulf states' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy gulf states , inc?
Answer: 3.6%
Financial report context:
table of contents capital deployment program will be subject to market and economic conditions , applicable legal requirements and other relevant factors . our capital deployment program does not obligate us to continue a dividend for any fixed period , and payment of dividends may be suspended at any time at our discretion . stock performance graph the following stock performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filings under the securities act of 1933 or the exchange act , each as amended , except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference into such filing . the following stock performance graph compares our cumulative total stockholder return on an annual basis on our common stock with the cumulative total return on the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index and the amex airline index from december 9 , 2013 ( the first trading day of aag common stock ) through december 31 , 2015 . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on december 9 , 2013 in aag common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends . the stock performance shown on the graph below represents historical stock performance and is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Financial table:
12/9/2013: american airlines group inc .; 12/31/2013: $ 100; 12/31/2014: $ 103; 12/31/2015: $ 219; column_5: $ 175
12/9/2013: amex airline index; 12/31/2013: 100; 12/31/2014: 102; 12/31/2015: 152; column_5: 127
12/9/2013: s&p 500; 12/31/2013: 100; 12/31/2014: 102; 12/31/2015: 114; column_5: 113

Additional report context:
purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers since july 2014 , our board of directors has approved several share repurchase programs aggregating $ 7.0 billion of authority of which , as of december 31 , 2015 , $ 2.4 billion remained unused under repurchase programs .

Question: what was the rate of growth or decrease from 2013 to 2014 on the amex airline index
Answer: 49%
Financial report context:
performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citi 2019s common stock , which is listed on the nyse under the ticker symbol 201cc 201d and held by 81805 common stockholders of record as of january 31 , 2016 , with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period through december 31 , 2015 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in citi 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index , and that all dividends were reinvested . comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended date citi s&p 500 financials .

Financial table:
date: 31-dec-2010; citi: 100.00; s&p 500: 100.00; s&p financials: 100.00
date: 30-dec-2011; citi: 55.67; s&p 500: 102.11; s&p financials: 82.94
date: 31-dec-2012; citi: 83.81; s&p 500: 118.45; s&p financials: 106.84
date: 31-dec-2013; citi: 110.49; s&p 500: 156.82; s&p financials: 144.90
date: 31-dec-2014; citi: 114.83; s&p 500: 178.28; s&p financials: 166.93
date: 31-dec-2015; citi: 110.14; s&p 500: 180.75; s&p financials: 164.39

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total return of citi common stock for the five years ended 31-dec-2015?
Answer: 10.14%
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .

Financial table:
4/09: netapp inc .; 4/10: $ 100.00; 4/11: $ 189.45; 4/12: $ 284.75; 4/13: $ 212.19; 4/14: $ 190.66; column_7: $ 197.58
4/09: nasdaq composite; 4/10: 100.00; 4/11: 144.63; 4/12: 170.44; 4/13: 182.57; 4/14: 202.25; column_7: 253.22
4/09: s&p 500; 4/10: 100.00; 4/11: 138.84; 4/12: 162.75; 4/13: 170.49; 4/14: 199.29; column_7: 240.02
4/09: s&p 500 information technology; 4/10: 100.00; 4/11: 143.49; 4/12: 162.37; 4/13: 186.06; 4/14: 189.18; column_7: 236.12

Additional report context:
we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ending 4/14 between netapp inc . and the nasdaq composite?
Answer: -55.64%
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2012; column_2: $ 49959
amount ( in thousands ): 2013; column_2: 50546
amount ( in thousands ): 2014; column_2: 51637
amount ( in thousands ): 2015; column_2: 52253
amount ( in thousands ): 2016; column_2: -
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: -
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 204395
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 25611
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 178784

Additional report context:
.

Question: in how many years will is the company expected to pay off all its future minimum lease payments?
Answer: 4
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the securities and exchange commission , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2002 in the s&p 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and the class b common stock of united parcel service , inc . comparison of five year cumulative total return $ 40.00 $ 60.00 $ 80.00 $ 100.00 $ 120.00 $ 140.00 $ 160.00 $ 180.00 $ 200.00 $ 220.00 2002 20072006200520042003 s&p 500 ups dj transport .

Financial table:
12/31/02: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/03: $ 100.00; 12/31/04: $ 119.89; 12/31/05: $ 139.55; 12/31/06: $ 124.88; 12/31/07: $ 127.08; column_7: $ 122.64
12/31/02: s&p 500 index; 12/31/03: $ 100.00; 12/31/04: $ 128.68; 12/31/05: $ 142.68; 12/31/06: $ 149.69; 12/31/07: $ 173.33; column_7: $ 182.85
12/31/02: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/03: $ 100.00; 12/31/04: $ 131.84; 12/31/05: $ 168.39; 12/31/06: $ 188.00; 12/31/07: $ 206.46; column_7: $ 209.40

Additional report context:
securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans the following table provides information as of december 31 , 2007 regarding compensation plans under which our class a common stock is authorized for issuance . these plans do not authorize the issuance of our class b common stock. .

Question: what is the rate of return of an investment in ups from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 16.4%
Financial report context:
14 2018 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2018 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2013: jkhy; 2014: 100.00; 2015: 128.02; 2016: 141.48; 2017: 193.46; 2018: 233.19; column_7: 296.19
2013: peer group; 2014: 100.00; 2015: 137.07; 2016: 171.80; 2017: 198.44; 2018: 231.11; column_7: 297.44
2013: s&p 500; 2014: 100.00; 2015: 124.61; 2016: 133.86; 2017: 139.20; 2018: 164.11; column_7: 187.70

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2013 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . dst systems , inc. , which had previously been part of the peer group , was acquired in 2018 and is no longer a public company . as a result , dst systems , inc . has been removed from the peer group and stock performance graph . the stock performance graph shall not be deemed 201cfiled 201d for purposes of section 18 of the exchange act , or incorporated by reference into any filing of the company under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act , except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing. .

Question: what was the percentage growth of the jkhy
Answer: 28.02%
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2009; column_2: $ 32452
amount ( in thousands ): 2010; column_2: 35138
amount ( in thousands ): 2011; column_2: 50421
amount ( in thousands ): 2012; column_2: 39067
amount ( in thousands ): 2013; column_2: 26301
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: 137858
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 321237
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 73512
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 247725

Additional report context:
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: not including years 'thereafter' , what is the total lease payments ? ( in $ thousands )
Answer: 183379