alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
entergy mississippi , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis other regulatory charges ( credits ) have no material effect on net income due to recovery and/or refund of such expenses . other regulatory credits increased primarily due to the under-recovery through the grand gulf rider of grand gulf capacity charges . 2003 compared to 2002 net revenue , which is entergy mississippi's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2003 to 2002. .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2002 net revenue; column_2: $ 380.2
( in millions ): base rates; column_2: 48.3
( in millions ): other; column_2: -1.9 ( 1.9 )
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 426.6

Additional report context:
the increase in base rates was effective january 2003 as approved by the mpsc . gross operating revenue , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory charges ( credits ) gross operating revenues increased primarily due to an increase in base rates effective january 2003 and an increase of $ 29.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to quarterly changes in the fuel factor resulting from the increases in market prices of natural gas and purchased power . this increase was partially offset by a decrease of $ 35.9 million in gross wholesale revenue as a result of decreased generation and purchases that resulted in less energy available for resale sales . fuel and fuel-related expenses decreased primarily due to the decreased recovery of fuel and purchased power costs and decreased generation , partially offset by an increase in the market price of purchased power . other regulatory charges increased primarily due to over-recovery of capacity charges related to the grand gulf rate rider and the cessation of the grand gulf accelerated recovery tariff that was suspended in july 2003 . other income statement variances 2004 compared to 2003 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 6.6 million in customer service support costs ; and 2022 an increase of $ 3.7 million in benefit costs . the increase was partially offset by the absence of the voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million that occurred in 2003 . taxes other than income taxes increased primarily due to a higher assessment of ad valorem and franchise taxes compared to the same period in 2003 . 2003 compared to 2002 other operation and maintenance expenses increased primarily due to : 2022 voluntary severance program accruals of $ 7.1 million ; and 2022 an increase of $ 4.4 million in benefit costs. .

Question: what is the decrease in gross wholesale revenue as a percentage of 2003 net revenue?
Answer: 8.42%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 281 pledged assets at december 31 , 2010 , assets were pledged to collateralize repur- chase agreements , other securities financing agreements , derivative transactions and for other purposes , including to secure borrowings and public deposits . certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged by the secured parties and are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consoli- dated balance sheets . in addition , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had pledged $ 288.7 billion and $ 344.6 billion , respectively , of financial instruments it owns that may not be sold or repledged by the secured parties . the significant components of the firm 2019s pledged assets were as follows. .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in billions ): securities; 2010: $ 112.1; 2009: $ 155.3
december 31 ( in billions ): loans; 2010: 214.8; 2009: 285.5
december 31 ( in billions ): trading assets and other; 2010: 123.2; 2009: 84.6
december 31 ( in billions ): totalassetspledged ( a ); 2010: $ 450.1; 2009: $ 525.4

Additional report context:
total assets pledged ( a ) $ 450.1 $ 525.4 ( a ) total assets pledged do not include assets of consolidated vies ; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities . see note 16 on pages 244 2013 259 of this annual report for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated vies . collateral at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had accepted assets as collateral that it could sell or repledge , deliver or otherwise use with a fair value of approximately $ 655.0 billion and $ 635.6 billion , respectively . this collateral was generally obtained under resale agreements , securities borrowing agreements , cus- tomer margin loans and derivative agreements . of the collateral received , approximately $ 521.3 billion and $ 472.7 billion were sold or repledged , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales and to collat- eralize deposits and derivative agreements . the reporting of collat- eral sold or repledged was revised in 2010 to include certain securities used to cover short sales and to collateralize deposits and derivative agreements . prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation . this revision had no impact on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets or its results of operations . contingencies in 2008 , the firm resolved with the irs issues related to compliance with reporting and withholding requirements for certain accounts transferred to the bank of new york mellon corporation ( 201cbnym 201d ) in connection with the firm 2019s sale to bnym of its corporate trust business . the resolution of these issues did not have a material effect on the firm. .

Question: what was the percent of the firm 2019s total pledged assets in 2010 that was loans
Answer: 47.7%
Financial report context:
packaging corporation of america notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) december 31 , 2002 2 . summary of significant accounting policies ( continued ) stock-based compensation pca entered into management equity agreements in june 1999 with 125 of its management-level employees . these agreements provide for the grant of options to purchase up to an aggregate of 6576460 shares of pca 2019s common stock at $ 4.55 per share , the same price per share at which pca holdings llc purchased common stock in the transactions . the agreement called for these options to vest ratably over a five-year period , or upon completion of an initial public offering , full vesting with contractual restrictions on transfer for a period of up to 18 months following completion of the offering . the options vested with the initial public offering in january 2000 , and the restriction period ended august , 2001 . in october 1999 , the company adopted a long-term equity incentive plan , which provides for grants of stock options , stock appreciation rights ( sars ) , restricted stock and performance awards to directors , officers and employees of pca , as well as others who engage in services for pca . option awards granted to officers and employees vest ratably over a four-year period , whereas option awards granted to directors vest immediately . under the plan , which will terminate on june 1 , 2009 , up to 4400000 shares of common stock is available for issuance under the long-term equity incentive plan . a summary of the company 2019s stock option activity , and related information for the years ended december 31 , 2002 , 2001 and 2000 follows : options weighted-average exercise price .

Financial table:
options: balance january 1 2000; weighted-average exercise price: 6569200; column_3: $ 4.55
options: granted; weighted-average exercise price: 1059700; column_3: 11.92
options: exercised; weighted-average exercise price: -398138 ( 398138 ); column_3: 4.55
options: forfeited; weighted-average exercise price: -26560 ( 26560 ); column_3: 6.88
options: balance december 31 2000; weighted-average exercise price: 7204202; column_3: $ 5.62
options: granted; weighted-average exercise price: 953350; column_3: 15.45
options: exercised; weighted-average exercise price: -1662475 ( 1662475 ); column_3: 4.59
options: forfeited; weighted-average exercise price: -16634 ( 16634 ); column_3: 11.18
options: balance december 31 2001; weighted-average exercise price: 6478443; column_3: $ 7.31
options: granted; weighted-average exercise price: 871000; column_3: 19.55
options: exercised; weighted-average exercise price: -811791 ( 811791 ); column_3: 5.52
options: forfeited; weighted-average exercise price: -63550 ( 63550 ); column_3: 15.44
options: balance december 31 2002; weighted-average exercise price: 6474102; column_3: $ 9.10

Additional report context:
clean proof : for cycle 12 .

Question: what is the total value of the balance of options as of december 31 , 2002 , in millions?
Answer: 58.9
Financial report context:
dish network corporation notes to consolidated financial statements - continued future minimum lease payments under the capital lease obligation , together with the present value of the net minimum lease payments as of december 31 , 2010 are as follows ( in thousands ) : for the years ended december 31 .

Financial table:
2011: 2012; $ 82184: 77110
2011: 2013; $ 82184: 75970
2011: 2014; $ 82184: 75970
2011: 2015; $ 82184: 75970
2011: thereafter; $ 82184: 390239
2011: total minimum lease payments; $ 82184: 777443
2011: less : amount representing lease of the orbital location and estimated executory costs ( primarily insurance and maintenance ) including profit thereon included in total minimum lease payments; $ 82184: -357982 ( 357982 )
2011: net minimum lease payments; $ 82184: 419461
2011: less : amount representing interest; $ 82184: -132490 ( 132490 )
2011: present value of net minimum lease payments; $ 82184: 286971
2011: less : current portion; $ 82184: -24801 ( 24801 )
2011: long-term portion of capital lease obligations; $ 82184: $ 262170

Additional report context:
the summary of future maturities of our outstanding long-term debt as of december 31 , 2010 is included in the commitments table in note 14 . 10 . income taxes and accounting for uncertainty in income taxes income taxes our income tax policy is to record the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and amounts reported on our consolidated balance sheets , as well as probable operating loss , tax credit and other carryforwards . deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that net deferred tax assets will not be realized . we periodically evaluate our need for a valuation allowance . determining necessary valuation allowances requires us to make assessments about historical financial information as well as the timing of future events , including the probability of expected future taxable income and available tax planning opportunities . as of december 31 , 2010 , we had no net operating loss carryforwards ( 201cnols 201d ) for federal income tax purposes and $ 13 million of nol benefit for state income tax purposes . the state nols begin to expire in the year 2020 . in addition , there are $ 11 million of tax benefits related to credit carryforwards which are partially offset by a valuation allowance and $ 42 million of capital loss carryforwards which were fully offset by a valuation allowance . the credit carryforwards begin to expire in the year 2011. .

Question: what percentage of total minimum lease payments are due in 2015?
Answer: 10%
Financial report context:
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 17.9 million primarily due to the write-off in 2014 of the regulatory assets associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower net revenue . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 696.3
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 12.9
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 4.7
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -2.4 ( 2.4 )
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: -2.8 ( 2.8 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -3.3 ( 3.3 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 705.4

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion on the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry. .

Question: for 2016 , what percentage of net revenue was due to the retail electric price adjustment?
Answer: 1.8%
Financial report context:
compensation plan approved by security holders . the employee stock purchase plan and the 2005 director stock plan were approved by shareholders at our 2005 annual meeting of shareholders . in connection with our mergers with cbot holdings and nymex holdings , we assumed their existing equity plans . the shares relating to the cbot holdings and nymex holdings plans are listed in the table below as being made under an equity compensation plan approved by security holders based upon the fact that shareholders of the company approved the related merger transactions . plan category number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ) weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ) number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ) equity compensation plans approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1211143 $ 308.10 5156223 equity compensation plans not approved by security holders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5978 22.00 2014 .

Financial table:
plan category: equity compensation plans approved by security holders; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 1211143; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): $ 308.10; number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ): 5156223
plan category: equity compensation plans not approved by security holders; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 5978; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): 22.00; number of securities remaining available for future issuance underequity compensation plans ( excluding securities reflected in column ( a ) ) ( c ): 2014
plan category: total; number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options ( a ): 1217121; weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options ( b ): 5156223

Additional report context:
item 13 . certain relationships , related transactions and director independence the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201ccertain business relationships with related parties 201d and 201ccorporate governance 2014director independence 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . item 14 . principal accountant fees and services the information required by this item is included in cme group 2019s proxy statement under the heading 201caudit committee disclosures 2014principal accountant fees and services 201d and 201caudit committee disclosures 2014audit committee policy for approval of audit and permitted non-audit services 201d and is incorporated herein by reference , pursuant to general instruction g ( 3 ) . .

Question: whats is the percentage of equity compensation plans that were not approved by security holders?
Answer: 0.491%
Financial report context:
other items on our consolidated financial statements have been appropriately adjusted from the amounts provided in the earnings release , including a reduction of our full year 2016 gross profit and income from operations by $ 2.9 million , and a reduction of net income by $ 1.7 million. .

Financial table:
( in thousands ): cash and cash equivalents; at december 31 , 2016: $ 250470; at december 31 , 2015: $ 129852; at december 31 , 2014: $ 593175; at december 31 , 2013: $ 347489; at december 31 , 2012: $ 341841
( in thousands ): working capital ( 1 ); at december 31 , 2016: 1279337; at december 31 , 2015: 1019953; at december 31 , 2014: 1127772; at december 31 , 2013: 702181; at december 31 , 2012: 651370
( in thousands ): inventories; at december 31 , 2016: 917491; at december 31 , 2015: 783031; at december 31 , 2014: 536714; at december 31 , 2013: 469006; at december 31 , 2012: 319286
( in thousands ): total assets; at december 31 , 2016: 3644331; at december 31 , 2015: 2865970; at december 31 , 2014: 2092428; at december 31 , 2013: 1576369; at december 31 , 2012: 1155052
( in thousands ): total debt including current maturities; at december 31 , 2016: 817388; at december 31 , 2015: 666070; at december 31 , 2014: 281546; at december 31 , 2013: 151551; at december 31 , 2012: 59858
( in thousands ): total stockholders 2019 equity; at december 31 , 2016: $ 2030900; at december 31 , 2015: $ 1668222; at december 31 , 2014: $ 1350300; at december 31 , 2013: $ 1053354; at december 31 , 2012: $ 816922

Additional report context:
( 1 ) working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. .

Question: what is the debt-to-equity ratio in 2016?
Answer: 40.2%
Financial report context:
property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Financial table:
land improvements: buildings; 20: 39-40
land improvements: furniture fixtures and equipment; 20: 3-10

Additional report context:
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges included in sg&a expense of approximately $ 0.2 million in the 2007 predecessor period , $ 9.4 million in 2006 and $ 0.6 million in 2005 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 3 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful lives unless such lives are deemed indefinite . amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment based on undiscounted cash flows , and , if impaired , written down to fair value based on either discounted cash flows or appraised values . intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested annually for impairment and written down to fair value as required . no impairment of intangible assets has been identified during any of the periods presented. .

Question: what was the amount of the total impairment charges included in sg&a expense from 2005 to 2007 in millions
Answer: 10.2
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2011; the priceline group inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2012; the priceline group inc .: 132.64; nasdaqcomposite index: 116.41; s&p 500index: 116.00; rdg internetcomposite: 119.34
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; the priceline group inc .: 248.53; nasdaqcomposite index: 165.47; s&p 500index: 153.58; rdg internetcomposite: 195.83
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; the priceline group inc .: 243.79; nasdaqcomposite index: 188.69; s&p 500index: 174.60; rdg internetcomposite: 192.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; the priceline group inc .: 272.59; nasdaqcomposite index: 200.32; s&p 500index: 177.01; rdg internetcomposite: 264.96
measurement pointdecember 31: 2016; the priceline group inc .: 313.45; nasdaqcomposite index: 216.54; s&p 500index: 198.18; rdg internetcomposite: 277.56

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage change in priceline group for the five year period ended 2016?
Answer: 213.45%