alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
6 . principal transactions citi 2019s principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities . trading activities include revenues from fixed income , equities , credit and commodities products and foreign exchange transactions that are managed on a portfolio basis characterized by primary risk . not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities , which is an integral part of trading activities 2019 profitability . for additional information regarding principal transactions revenue , see note a04 to the consolidated financial statements for information about net interest revenue related to trading activities . principal transactions include cva ( credit valuation adjustments on derivatives ) and fva ( funding valuation adjustments ) on over-the-counter derivatives . these adjustments are discussed further in note 24 to the consolidated financial statements . the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: interest rate risks ( 1 ); 2018: $ 5186; 2017: $ 5301; 2016: $ 4229
in millions of dollars: foreign exchange risks ( 2 ); 2018: 1423; 2017: 2435; 2016: 1699
in millions of dollars: equity risks ( 3 ); 2018: 1346; 2017: 525; 2016: 330
in millions of dollars: commodity and other risks ( 4 ); 2018: 662; 2017: 425; 2016: 899
in millions of dollars: credit products and risks ( 5 ); 2018: 445; 2017: 789; 2016: 700
in millions of dollars: total; 2018: $ 9062; 2017: $ 9475; 2016: $ 7857

Additional report context:
( 1 ) includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt , municipal securities , mortgage securities and other debt instruments . also includes spot and forward trading of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter ( otc ) currency options , options on fixed income securities , interest rate swaps , currency swaps , swap options , caps and floors , financial futures , otc options and forward contracts on fixed income securities . ( 2 ) includes revenues from foreign exchange spot , forward , option and swap contracts , as well as foreign currency translation ( fx translation ) gains and losses . ( 3 ) includes revenues from common , preferred and convertible preferred stock , convertible corporate debt , equity-linked notes and exchange-traded and otc equity options and warrants . ( 4 ) primarily includes revenues from crude oil , refined oil products , natural gas and other commodities trades . ( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Question: what percentage of total principal transactions revenue in 2018 was do to interest rate risks?
Answer: 57%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following graph sets forth the cumulative total shareholder return on our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock as compared with the cumulative total return of the companies listed in the standard and poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and a peer group of companies comprised of cbs corporation class b common stock , news corporation class a common stock , scripps network interactive , inc. , time warner , inc. , viacom , inc . class b common stock and the walt disney company . the graph assumes $ 100 originally invested on september 18 , 2008 , the date upon which our common stock began trading , in each of our series a common stock , series b common stock and series c common stock , the s&p 500 index , and the stock of our peer group companies , including reinvestment of dividends , for the period september 18 , 2008 through december 31 , 2008 and the years ended december 31 , 2009 , 2010 and 2011 . of cash on hand , cash generated by operations , borrowings under our revolving credit facility and future financing transactions . under the program , management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions at prevailing prices as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements , and subject to stock price , business conditions , market conditions and other factors . the repurchase program does not have an expiration date . the above repurchases were funded using cash on hand . there were no repurchases of our series a common stock or series b common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2011 . december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Financial table:
december 31 2008: disca; december 31 2009: $ 102.53; december 31 2010: $ 222.09; december 31 2011: $ 301.96; column_5: $ 296.67
december 31 2008: discb; december 31 2009: $ 78.53; december 31 2010: $ 162.82; december 31 2011: $ 225.95; column_5: $ 217.56
december 31 2008: disck; december 31 2009: $ 83.69; december 31 2010: $ 165.75; december 31 2011: $ 229.31; column_5: $ 235.63
december 31 2008: s&p 500; december 31 2009: $ 74.86; december 31 2010: $ 92.42; december 31 2011: $ 104.24; column_5: $ 104.23
december 31 2008: peer group; december 31 2009: $ 68.79; december 31 2010: $ 100.70; december 31 2011: $ 121.35; column_5: $ 138.19

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return on disca from september 18 , 2008 to december 31 , 2011?
Answer: 196.67%
Financial report context:
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the following table summarizes our outstanding costless collar hedges for occ as of december 31 , 2016 : year tons hedged weighted average floor strike price per ton weighted average cap strike price per ton .

Financial table:
year: 2017; tons hedged: 120000; weighted average floor strikeprice per ton: $ 81.50; weighted average cap strikeprice per ton: $ 120.00
year: 2018; tons hedged: 120000; weighted average floor strikeprice per ton: 81.50; weighted average cap strikeprice per ton: 120.00

Additional report context:
costless collar hedges are recorded in our consolidated balance sheets at fair value . fair values of costless collars are determined using standard option valuation models with assumptions about commodity prices based upon forward commodity price curves in underlying markets ( level 2 in the fair value hierarchy ) . we had no outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2015 . the aggregated fair values of the outstanding recycling commodity hedges as of december 31 , 2016 were current liabilities of $ 0.8 million , and have been recorded in other accrued liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets . no amounts were recognized in other income , net in our consolidated statements of income for the ineffective portion of the changes in fair values during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 . total loss recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ ( 0.5 ) million for the year ended december 31 , 2016 . no amount was recognized in other comprehensive income for 2015 . total gain recognized in other comprehensive income for recycling commodity hedges ( the effective portion ) was $ 0.1 million for the year ended december 31 , 2014 . fair value measurements in measuring fair values of assets and liabilities , we use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs ( level 1 ) and minimize the use of unobservable inputs ( level 3 ) . we also use market data or assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability , including assumptions about risk when appropriate . the carrying value for certain of our financial instruments , including cash , accounts receivable , accounts payable and certain other accrued liabilities , approximates fair value because of their short-term nature. .

Question: what was the ratio of the tons hedged in 2017 to 2018
Answer: 1
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of related tax , are as follows: .

Financial table:
( millions ) as of december 31: net derivative gains ( losses ); 2007: $ 24; 2006: $ 15; 2005: $ -11 ( 11 )
( millions ) as of december 31: net unrealized investment gains; 2007: 76; 2006: 73; 2005: 52
( millions ) as of december 31: net foreign exchange translation; 2007: 284; 2006: 118; 2005: -119 ( 119 )
( millions ) as of december 31: postretirement plans; 2007: -1110 ( 1110 ); 2006: -1216 ( 1216 ); 2005: -1077 ( 1077 )
( millions ) as of december 31: accumulated other comprehensive loss; 2007: $ -726 ( 726 ); 2006: $ -1010 ( 1010 ); 2005: $ -1155 ( 1155 )

Additional report context:
aon corporation .

Question: what is the net change in the balance of accumulated other comprehensive loss from 2006 to 2007?
Answer: 284
Financial report context:
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of our unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Financial table:
2018: balance at january 1; 2017: $ 11; column_3: $ 11
2018: balance at december 31; 2017: $ 11; column_3: $ 11

Additional report context:
all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 21% ( 21 % ) ( 35% ( 35 % ) in 2017 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . we expect a decrease to the balance of unrecognized tax benefits within 12 months of the reporting date of approximately $ 3 million . as of december 31 , 2018 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2015-2018 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 . 8 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2018 , all or a portion of 25 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the fixed portion of the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 7 million as of december 31 , 2018 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .

Question: what was the change in million of the unrecognized tax benefits between 2017 and 2018?
Answer: 0
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph and table compares the cumulative five-year total return provided to shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and our customized peer group . the peer group includes cboe holdings , inc. , intercontinentalexchange group , inc . and nasdaq , inc . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer group and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2012 , and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2017 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group 12/12 12/13 12/14 12/15 12/16 cme group inc . s&p 500 peer group * $ 100 invested on 12/31/12 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Financial table:
2013: cme group inc .; 2014: $ 164.01; 2015: $ 194.06; 2016: $ 208.95; 2017: $ 279.85; column_6: $ 370.32
2013: s&p 500; 2014: 132.39; 2015: 150.51; 2016: 152.59; 2017: 170.84; column_6: 208.14
2013: peer group; 2014: 176.61; 2015: 187.48; 2016: 219.99; 2017: 249.31; column_6: 323.23

Additional report context:
unregistered sales of equity securities during the past three years there have not been any unregistered sales by the company of equity securities. .

Question: did the cme group inc . outperform the s&p 500 over 5 years?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 26 , 2008 through october 27 , 2013 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 26 , 2008 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * assumes $ 100 invested on 10/26/08 in stock or 10/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

Financial table:
10/26/2008: applied materials; 10/25/2009: 100.00; 10/31/2010: 116.07; 10/30/2011: 113.08; 10/28/2012: 118.21; 10/27/2013: 102.77; column_7: 175.76
10/26/2008: s&p 500 index; 10/25/2009: 100.00; 10/31/2010: 109.80; 10/30/2011: 127.94; 10/28/2012: 138.29; 10/27/2013: 159.32; column_7: 202.61
10/26/2008: rdg semiconductor composite index; 10/25/2009: 100.00; 10/31/2010: 124.98; 10/30/2011: 153.98; 10/28/2012: 166.89; 10/27/2013: 149.81; column_7: 200.47

Additional report context:
dividends during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.07 . dividends declared during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 469 million , $ 438 million and $ 408 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders. .

Question: what is the total return if 100000 are invested in s&p500 in 2008 and sold in 2011?
Answer: 3829
Financial report context:
property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Financial table:
land improvements: buildings; 20: 39-40
land improvements: furniture fixtures and equipment; 20: 3-10

Additional report context:
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges included in sg&a expense of approximately $ 0.2 million in the 2007 predecessor period , $ 9.4 million in 2006 and $ 0.6 million in 2005 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 3 . goodwill and other intangible assets the company amortizes intangible assets over their estimated useful lives unless such lives are deemed indefinite . amortizable intangible assets are tested for impairment based on undiscounted cash flows , and , if impaired , written down to fair value based on either discounted cash flows or appraised values . intangible assets with indefinite lives are tested annually for impairment and written down to fair value as required . no impairment of intangible assets has been identified during any of the periods presented. .

Question: what was the change in millions of impairment charges included in sg&a expense from 2006 to 2007
Answer: -9.2
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 . the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Financial table:
2001 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 60.15: 52.25; low $ 41.30: 39.95; 2000 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 44.72: 49.63; low $ 34.25: 35.56
2001 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 60.15: 44.50; low $ 41.30: 12.00; 2000 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 44.72: 70.25; low $ 34.25: 45.13
2001 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 60.15: 17.80; low $ 41.30: 11.60; 2000 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 44.72: 72.81; low $ 34.25: 45.00

Additional report context:
( b ) holders . as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . ( c ) dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was the difference in the companies high compared to its low sales price for the second quarter of 2001?
Answer: 12.30
Financial report context:
24 2017 annual report performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2017 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company : comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2012: jkhy; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 138.34; 2015: 177.10; 2016: 195.72; 2017: 267.64; column_7: 322.60
2012: peer group; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 117.87; 2015: 161.90; 2016: 203.87; 2017: 233.39; column_7: 271.10
2012: s&p 500; 2013: 100.00; 2014: 120.60; 2015: 150.27; 2016: 161.43; 2017: 167.87; column_7: 197.92

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2012 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . companies in the peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; convergys corp. ; corelogic , inc. ; dst systems , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone systems , inc. ; and wex , inc.. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the s&p 500 stock performance from 2014 to 2015
Answer: 7.42%