alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) ( amounts in millions , except per share amounts ) a summary of the remaining liability for the 2007 , 2003 and 2001 restructuring programs is as follows : program program program total .

Financial table:
2007 program: liability at december 31 2006; 2003 program: $ 2014; 2001 program: $ 12.6; total: $ 19.2; column_5: $ 31.8
2007 program: net charges ( reversals ) and adjustments; 2003 program: 19.1; 2001 program: -0.5 ( 0.5 ); total: -5.2 ( 5.2 ); column_5: 13.4
2007 program: payments and other1; 2003 program: -7.2 ( 7.2 ); 2001 program: -3.1 ( 3.1 ); total: -5.3 ( 5.3 ); column_5: -15.6 ( 15.6 )
2007 program: liability at december 31 2007; 2003 program: $ 11.9; 2001 program: $ 9.0; total: $ 8.7; column_5: $ 29.6
2007 program: net charges and adjustments; 2003 program: 4.3; 2001 program: 0.8; total: 0.7; column_5: 5.8
2007 program: payments and other1; 2003 program: -15.0 ( 15.0 ); 2001 program: -4.1 ( 4.1 ); total: -3.5 ( 3.5 ); column_5: -22.6 ( 22.6 )
2007 program: liability at december 31 2008; 2003 program: $ 1.2; 2001 program: $ 5.7; total: $ 5.9; column_5: $ 12.8

Additional report context:
1 includes amounts representing adjustments to the liability for changes in foreign currency exchange rates . other reorganization-related charges other reorganization-related charges relate to our realignment of our media businesses into a newly created management entity called mediabrands and the 2006 merger of draft worldwide and foote , cone and belding worldwide to create draftfcb . charges related to severance and terminations costs and lease termination and other exit costs . we expect charges associated with mediabrands to be completed during the first half of 2009 . charges related to the creation of draftfcb in 2006 are complete . the charges were separated from the rest of our operating expenses within the consolidated statements of operations because they did not result from charges that occurred in the normal course of business. .

Question: what is the average liability for all three programs , as of december 31 , 2008 , in millions?
Answer: 4.27
Financial report context:
equipment and energy .

Financial table:
2013: sales; 2012: $ 451.1; 2011: $ 420.1; column_4: $ 400.6
2013: operating income; 2012: 65.5; 2011: 44.6; column_4: 62.8

Additional report context:
2013 vs . 2012 sales of $ 451.1 increased primarily from higher lng project activity . operating income of $ 65.5 increased from the higher lng project activity . the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2013 was $ 402 , compared to $ 450 at 30 september 2012 . it is expected that approximately $ 250 of the backlog will be completed during 2014 . 2012 vs . 2011 sales of $ 420.1 increased 5% ( 5 % ) , or $ 19.5 , reflecting higher air separation unit ( asu ) activity . operating income of $ 44.6 decreased 29% ( 29 % ) , or $ 18.2 , reflecting lower lng project activity . the sales backlog for the equipment business at 30 september 2012 was $ 450 , compared to $ 334 at 30 september 2011 . other operating income ( loss ) primarily includes other expense and income that cannot be directly associated with the business segments , including foreign exchange gains and losses . also included are lifo inventory valuation adjustments , as the business segments use fifo , and the lifo pool valuation adjustments are not allocated to the business segments . other also included stranded costs resulting from discontinued operations , as these costs were not reallocated to the businesses in 2012 . 2013 vs . 2012 other operating loss was $ 4.7 , compared to $ 6.6 in the prior year . the current year includes an unfavorable lifo adjustment versus the prior year of $ 11 . the prior year loss included stranded costs from discontinued operations of $ 10 . 2012 vs . 2011 other operating loss was $ 6.6 , compared to $ 39.3 in the prior year , primarily due to a reduction in stranded costs , a decrease in the lifo adjustment as a result of decreases in inventory values , and favorable foreign exchange , partially offset by gains on asset sales in the prior year. .

Question: considering the year 2013 , what is the sales to operating income ratio?
Answer: 6.88
Financial report context:
during 2015 , $ 82 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 91 million of provision recapture during 2014 . charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2015 were $ 12 million compared to $ 42 million during 2014 . at december 31 , 2015 and december 31 , 2014 , the alll on total purchased impaired loans was $ .3 billion and $ .9 billion , respectively . the decline in alll was primarily due to the change in our derecognition policy . for purchased impaired loan pools where an allowance has been recognized , subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded alll to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re- estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the alll associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2015 and 2014 follows : table 66 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

Financial table:
in millions: january 1; 2015: $ 1558; 2014: $ 2055
in millions: accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ); 2015: -466 ( 466 ); 2014: -587 ( 587 )
in millions: net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable; 2015: 226; 2014: 208
in millions: disposals; 2015: -68 ( 68 ); 2014: -118 ( 118 )
in millions: december 31; 2015: $ 1250; 2014: $ 1558

Additional report context:
note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data follows . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 141 .

Question: for 2015 and 2014 , what was the average in millions for provision recapture for purchased impaired loans?
Answer: 86.5
Financial report context:
page 15 of 100 shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation 2019s cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2010 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return analysis .

Financial table:
12/31/05: ball corporation; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 110.86; 12/31/08: $ 115.36; 12/31/09: $ 107.58; 12/31/10: $ 134.96; column_7: $ 178.93
12/31/05: dj containers & packaging index; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 112.09; 12/31/08: $ 119.63; 12/31/09: $ 75.00; 12/31/10: $ 105.34; column_7: $ 123.56
12/31/05: s&p 500 index; 12/31/06: $ 100.00; 12/31/07: $ 115.80; 12/31/08: $ 122.16; 12/31/09: $ 76.96; 12/31/10: $ 97.33; column_7: $ 111.99
12/31/05: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/06: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/07: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/08: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/09: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); 12/31/10: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm ); column_7: copyright a9 2011 standard & poor 2019s a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . ( www.researchdatagroup.com/s&p.htm )
12/31/05: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/06: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/07: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/08: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/09: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; 12/31/10: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .; column_7: copyright a9 2011 dow jones & company . all rights reserved .

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the five year total return on ball stock?
Answer: 34.96
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 1520.5
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 33.8
amount ( in millions ): opportunity sales; column_2: 5.6
amount ( in millions ): asset retirement obligation; column_2: -14.8 ( 14.8 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -29.0 ( 29.0 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 6.5
amount ( in millions ): 2017 net revenue; column_2: $ 1522.6

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions
Answer: 1521.55
Financial report context:
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2005 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization .

Financial table:
balance december 31 2002: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense; $ 450697000: 68125000
balance december 31 2002: deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property; $ 450697000: -4645000 ( 4645000 )
balance december 31 2002: balance december 31 2003; $ 450697000: 514177000
balance december 31 2002: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense; $ 450697000: 82551000
balance december 31 2002: deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property; $ 450697000: -1390000 ( 1390000 )
balance december 31 2002: balance december 31 2004; $ 450697000: 595338000
balance december 31 2002: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense; $ 450697000: 83656000
balance december 31 2002: deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property; $ 450697000: -15244000 ( 15244000 )
balance december 31 2002: balance december 31 2005; $ 450697000: $ 663750000

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the growth of the additions in comparison with the growth of the deductions during 2003 and 2004?
Answer: 92%
Financial report context:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) c o n t i n u e d summary of changes in standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas reserves ( in millions ) 2007 2006 2005 sales and transfers of oil and gas produced , net of production , transportation and administrative costs $ ( 4887 ) $ ( 5312 ) $ ( 3754 ) net changes in prices and production , transportation and administrative costs related to future production 12845 ( 1342 ) 6648 .

Financial table:
( in millions ): sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production transportation and administrative costs; 2007: $ -4887 ( 4887 ); 2006: $ -5312 ( 5312 ); 2005: $ -3754 ( 3754 )
( in millions ): net changes in prices and production transportation and administrative costs related to future production; 2007: 12845; 2006: -1342 ( 1342 ); 2005: 6648
( in millions ): extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs; 2007: 1816; 2006: 1290; 2005: 700
( in millions ): development costs incurred during the period; 2007: 1654; 2006: 1251; 2005: 1030
( in millions ): changes in estimated future development costs; 2007: -1727 ( 1727 ); 2006: -527 ( 527 ); 2005: -552 ( 552 )
( in millions ): revisions of previous quantity estimates; 2007: 290; 2006: 1319; 2005: 820
( in millions ): net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place; 2007: 23; 2006: 30; 2005: 4557
( in millions ): accretion of discount; 2007: 1726; 2006: 1882; 2005: 1124
( in millions ): net change in income taxes; 2007: -6751 ( 6751 ); 2006: -660 ( 660 ); 2005: -6694 ( 6694 )
( in millions ): timing and other; 2007: -12 ( 12 ); 2006: -14 ( 14 ); 2005: 307
( in millions ): net change for the year; 2007: 4977; 2006: -2083 ( 2083 ); 2005: 4186
( in millions ): beginning of year; 2007: 8518; 2006: 10601; 2005: 6415
( in millions ): end of year; 2007: $ 13495; 2006: $ 8518; 2005: $ 10601
( in millions ): net change for the year from discontinued operations; 2007: $ 2013; 2006: $ -216 ( 216 ); 2005: $ 162

Additional report context:
.

Question: 5 development costs incurred during the period 1654 1251 1030
Answer: 1311.7
Financial report context:
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 28 , 2013 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 29.9 16.7 46.6 leased facilities2 2.3 6.0 8.3 .

Financial table:
( square feet in millions ): owned facilities1; unitedstates: 29.9; othercountries: 16.7; total: 46.6
( square feet in millions ): leased facilities2; unitedstates: 2.3; othercountries: 6.0; total: 8.3
( square feet in millions ): total facilities; unitedstates: 32.2; othercountries: 22.7; total: 54.9

Additional report context:
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2028 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a significant amount of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . in addition to our current facilities , we are building a development fabrication facility in oregon which began r&d start-up in 2013 . we expect that this new facility will allow us to widen our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 , which is currently not in use and is not being depreciated . we recently announced that we plan to delay equipment installation in this building and leverage existing fabrication facilities , reserving this new facility for additional capacity and future technologies . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in israel , china , and ireland . our fabrication facility in ireland is currently transitioning to a newer process technology node , with manufacturing expected to recommence in 2015 . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , costa rica , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 27 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 26 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable . table of contents .

Question: what percentage of major facilities by square footage are owned as of december 28 , 2013?
Answer: 85%
Financial report context:
stockholder return performance graphs the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 on december 29 , 2007 and tracks it through december 29 , 2012 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/29/1212/31/111/1/111/2/101/3/0912/29/07 *$ 100 invested on 12/29/07 in stock or 12/31/07 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2013 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
12/29/2007: cadence design systems inc .; 1/3/2009: 100.00; 1/2/2010: 22.55; 1/1/2011: 35.17; 12/31/2011: 48.50; 12/29/2012: 61.07; column_7: 78.92
12/29/2007: nasdaq composite; 1/3/2009: 100.00; 1/2/2010: 59.03; 1/1/2011: 82.25; 12/31/2011: 97.32; 12/29/2012: 98.63; column_7: 110.78
12/29/2007: s&p 400 information technology; 1/3/2009: 100.00; 1/2/2010: 54.60; 1/1/2011: 82.76; 12/31/2011: 108.11; 12/29/2012: 95.48; column_7: 109.88

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the five years ended 12/29/2012?
Answer: -21.08%
Financial report context:
in the ordinary course of business , based on our evaluations of certain geologic trends and prospective economics , we have allowed certain lease acreage to expire and may allow additional acreage to expire in the future . if production is not established or we take no other action to extend the terms of the leases , licenses or concessions , undeveloped acreage listed in the table below will expire over the next three years . we plan to continue the terms of certain of these licenses and concession areas or retain leases through operational or administrative actions ; however , the majority of the undeveloped acres associated with other africa as listed in the table below pertains to our licenses in ethiopia and kenya , for which we executed agreements in 2015 to sell . the kenya transaction closed in february 2016 and the ethiopia transaction is expected to close in the first quarter of 2016 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 5 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information about this disposition . net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 .

Financial table:
( in thousands ): u.s .; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016: 68; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017: 89; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018: 128
( in thousands ): e.g .; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016: 2014; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017: 92; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018: 36
( in thousands ): other africa; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016: 189; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017: 4352; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018: 854
( in thousands ): total africa; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016: 189; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017: 4444; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018: 890
( in thousands ): other international; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016: 2014; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017: 2014; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018: 2014
( in thousands ): total; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2016: 257; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2017: 4533; net undeveloped acres expiring year ended december 31 , 2018: 1018

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was total net undeveloped acres expiring for the three year period , in thousands?
Answer: 5808