alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
part ii , item 8 fourth quarter of 2007 : 0160 schlumberger sold certain workover rigs for $ 32 million , resulting in a pretax gain of $ 24 million ( $ 17 million after-tax ) which is classified in interest and other income , net in the consolidated statement of income . 4 . acquisitions acquisition of eastern echo holding plc on december 10 , 2007 , schlumberger completed the acquisition of eastern echo holding plc ( 201ceastern echo 201d ) for $ 838 million in cash . eastern echo was a dubai-based marine seismic company that did not have any operations at the time of acquisition , but had signed contracts for the construction of six seismic vessels . the purchase price has been allocated to the net assets acquired based upon their estimated fair values as follows : ( stated in millions ) .

Financial table:
cash and short-term investments: other current assets; $ 266: 23
cash and short-term investments: fixed income investments held to maturity; $ 266: 54
cash and short-term investments: vessels under construction; $ 266: 694
cash and short-term investments: accounts payable and accrued liabilities; $ 266: -17 ( 17 )
cash and short-term investments: long-term debt; $ 266: -182 ( 182 )
cash and short-term investments: total purchase price; $ 266: $ 838

Additional report context:
other acquisitions schlumberger has made other acquisitions and minority interest investments , none of which were significant on an individual basis , for cash payments , net of cash acquired , of $ 514 million during 2009 , $ 345 million during 2008 , and $ 281 million during 2007 . pro forma results pertaining to the above acquisitions are not presented as the impact was not significant . 5 . drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco drilling fluids joint venture is owned 40% ( 40 % ) by schlumberger and 60% ( 60 % ) by smith international , inc . schlumberger records income relating to this venture using the equity method of accounting . the carrying value of schlumberger 2019s investment in the joint venture on december 31 , 2009 and 2008 was $ 1.4 billion and $ 1.3 billion , respectively , and is included within investments in affiliated companies on the consolidated balance sheet . schlumberger 2019s equity income from this joint venture was $ 131 million in 2009 , $ 210 million in 2008 and $ 178 million in 2007 . schlumberger received cash distributions from the joint venture of $ 106 million in 2009 , $ 57 million in 2008 and $ 46 million in 2007 . the joint venture agreement contains a provision under which either party to the joint venture may offer to sell its entire interest in the venture to the other party at a cash purchase price per percentage interest specified in an offer notice . if the offer to sell is not accepted , the offering party will be obligated to purchase the entire interest of the other party at the same price per percentage interest as the prices specified in the offer notice. .

Question: what was the growth rate of the equity income in drilling fluids joint venture the mi-swaco from 2007 to 2007 for schlumberger
Answer: 18%
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2008 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

Financial table:
12/31/2008: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/2009: $ 100.00; 12/31/2010: $ 107.75; 12/31/2011: $ 140.39; 12/31/2012: $ 145.84; 12/31/2013: $ 151.44; column_7: $ 221.91
12/31/2008: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/2009: $ 100.00; 12/31/2010: $ 126.45; 12/31/2011: $ 145.49; 12/31/2012: $ 148.55; 12/31/2013: $ 172.30; column_7: $ 228.09
12/31/2008: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/2009: $ 100.00; 12/31/2010: $ 118.59; 12/31/2011: $ 150.30; 12/31/2012: $ 150.31; 12/31/2013: $ 161.56; column_7: $ 228.42

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the difference in performance for the five years ended 12/21/2013 between united parcel service inc . and the standard & poor's 500 index?
Answer: -5.18%
Financial report context:
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) .

Financial table:
lilly: dec-13; peer group: $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
lilly: dec-14; peer group: $ 139.75; s&p 500: $ 114.39; column_4: $ 113.69
lilly: dec-15; peer group: $ 175.21; s&p 500: $ 116.56; column_4: $ 115.26
lilly: dec-16; peer group: $ 157.03; s&p 500: $ 112.80; column_4: $ 129.05
lilly: dec-17; peer group: $ 185.04; s&p 500: $ 128.90; column_4: $ 157.22
lilly: dec-18; peer group: $ 259.88; s&p 500: $ 136.56; column_4: $ 150.33

Additional report context:
( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage return for lilly compared to the peer group for the five years ended dec-18?
Answer: 123.32%
Financial report context:
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 20 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2012 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , are as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .

Financial table:
2013: 2014; $ 1842355: 1738439
2013: 2015; $ 1842355: 1578559
2013: 2016; $ 1842355: 1400020
2013: 2017; $ 1842355: 1249904
2013: thereafter; $ 1842355: 6134903

Additional report context:
these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8466000 , $ 7995000 and $ 7339000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2012 , 2011 and 2010 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we were due $ 5000000 of annual rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop contested our right to reallocate the rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we had a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent . at december 31 , 2012 , we had a $ 47900000 receivable from stop and shop , which is included as a component of 201ctenant and other receivables 201d on our consolidated balance sheet . on february 6 , 2013 , we received $ 124000000 pursuant to a settlement agreement with stop & shop ( see note 22 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . .

Question: for 2012 and 2011 , percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales totaled what in thousands?
Answer: 16461111
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements 4 . the sum of the quarters 2019 earnings per common share may not equal the annual amounts due to the averaging effect of the number of shares and share equivalents throughout the year . 5 . during the fourth quarter of 2016 , net revenues included losses of approximately $ 60 million on sales and markdowns of legacy limited partnership investments in third-party-sponsored funds within the invest- ment management business segment . the fourth quarter of 2016 also included a $ 70 million provision within the wealth management busi- ness segment related to certain brokerage service reporting activities . employee share-based awards .

Financial table:
$ in millions: discrete tax benefit; 2017 quarter first: $ 112; 2017 quarter second: $ 16; 2017 quarter third: $ 11; 2017 quarter fourth: $ 16

Additional report context:
24 . subsequent events the firm has evaluated subsequent events for adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements through the date of this report and has not identified any recordable or disclos- able events not otherwise reported in these financial state- ments or the notes thereto . 175 december 2017 form 10-k .

Question: what was the total discrete tax benefit from employee share-based awards in 2017 in millions?
Answer: 155
Financial report context:
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Financial table:
land improvements: buildings; 20: 39-40
land improvements: furniture fixtures and equipment; 20: 3-10

Additional report context:
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .

Question: what is the yearly depreciation rate on land improvements?
Answer: 5%
Financial report context:
operating expenses as a percentage of total revenue .

Financial table:
2006: marketing and sales; 2005: 27% ( 27 % ); 2004: 28% ( 28 % ); column_4: 28% ( 28 % )
2006: research and development; 2005: 31% ( 31 % ); 2004: 29% ( 29 % ); column_4: 31% ( 31 % )
2006: general and administrative; 2005: 10% ( 10 % ); 2004: 10% ( 10 % ); column_4: 7% ( 7 % )

Additional report context:
operating expense summary 2006 compared to 2005 overall operating expenses increased $ 122.5 million in 2006 , as compared to 2005 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 58.4 million in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no . 123r ; and 2022 an increase of $ 49.2 million in salary , benefits and other employee-related costs , primarily due to an increased number of employees and increases in bonus and commission costs , in part due to our acquisition of verisity ltd. , or verisity , in the second quarter of 2005 . 2005 compared to 2004 operating expenses increased $ 97.4 million in 2005 , as compared to 2004 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 63.3 million in employee salary and benefit costs , primarily due to our acquisition of verisity and increased bonus and commission costs ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.9 million in stock-based compensation expense due to grants of restricted stock and the assumption of options in our acquisitions ; 2022 an increase of $ 8.6 million in losses associated with the sale of installment contract receivables ; and 2022 an increase of $ 7.1 million in costs related to the retirement of our executive chairman and former president and chief executive officer in 2005 ; partially offset by 2022 our restructuring activities , as discussed below . marketing and sales 2006 compared to 2005 marketing and sales expenses increased $ 39.4 million in 2006 , as compared to 2005 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 14.8 million in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no . 123r ; 2022 an increase of $ 18.2 million in employee salary , commissions , benefits and other employee-related costs due to increased hiring of sales and technical personnel , and higher commissions earned resulting from an increase in 2006 sales performance ; and 2022 an increase of $ 7.8 million in marketing programs and customer-focused conferences due to our new marketing initiatives and increased travel to visit our customers . 2005 compared to 2004 marketing and sales expenses increased $ 33.1 million in 2005 , as compared to 2004 , primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 29.4 million in employee salary , commission and benefit costs due to increased hiring of sales and technical personnel and higher employee bonuses and commissions ; and 2022 an increase of $ 1.6 million in stock-based compensation expense due to grants of restricted stock and the assumption of options in our acquisitions ; partially offset by 2022 a decrease of $ 1.9 million in marketing program costs. .

Question: what portion of the increase of operating expense in 2006 is incurred by the increase in stock-based compensation expense due to our adoption of sfas no?
Answer: 47.7%
Financial report context:
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested . the information below is historical in nature and is not necessarily indicative of future performance . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2015 , we repurchased 36921641 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 99.16 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2015 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b] .

Financial table:
period: oct . 1 through oct . 31; total number of shares purchased [a]: 3247731; average price paid per share: $ 92.98; total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]: 3221153; maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]: 56078192
period: nov . 1 through nov . 30; total number of shares purchased [a]: 2325865; average price paid per share: 86.61; total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]: 2322992; maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]: 53755200
period: dec . 1 through dec . 31; total number of shares purchased [a]: 1105389; average price paid per share: 77.63; total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]: 1102754; maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]: 52652446
period: total; total number of shares purchased [a]: 6678985; average price paid per share: $ 88.22; total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announcedplan or program [b]: 6646899; maximum number of shares remaining under the plan or program [b]: n/a

Additional report context:
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 32086 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] effective january 1 , 2014 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 120 million shares of our common stock by december 31 , 2017 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: in the fourth quarter ended december 31 , 2015 what was the percent of the total number of shares purchased that was attributable to the employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations
Answer: 0.5%
Financial report context:
five-year performance comparison 2013 the following graph provides an indicator of cumulative total shareholder returns for the corporation as compared to the peer group index ( described above ) , the dj trans , and the s&p 500 . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested in the common stock of union pacific corporation and each index on december 31 , 2007 and that all dividends were reinvested . purchases of equity securities 2013 during 2012 , we repurchased 13804709 shares of our common stock at an average price of $ 115.33 . the following table presents common stock repurchases during each month for the fourth quarter of 2012 : period total number of shares purchased [a] average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of a publicly announced plan or program [b] maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan or program [b] .

Financial table:
period: oct . 1 through oct . 31; total number ofsharespurchased [a]: 1068414; averageprice paidper share: 121.70; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b]: 1028300; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: 16041399
period: nov . 1 through nov . 30; total number ofsharespurchased [a]: 659631; averageprice paidper share: 120.84; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b]: 655000; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: 15386399
period: dec . 1 through dec . 31; total number ofsharespurchased [a]: 411683; averageprice paidper share: 124.58; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b]: 350450; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: 15035949
period: total; total number ofsharespurchased [a]: 2139728; averageprice paidper share: $ 121.99; total number of sharespurchased as part of apublicly announced planor program [b]: 2033750; maximum number ofshares that may yetbe purchased under the planor program [b]: n/a

Additional report context:
[a] total number of shares purchased during the quarter includes approximately 105978 shares delivered or attested to upc by employees to pay stock option exercise prices , satisfy excess tax withholding obligations for stock option exercises or vesting of retention units , and pay withholding obligations for vesting of retention shares . [b] on april 1 , 2011 , our board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to 40 million shares of our common stock by march 31 , 2014 . these repurchases may be made on the open market or through other transactions . our management has sole discretion with respect to determining the timing and amount of these transactions. .

Question: what was the cost of total share repurchases during 2012?
Answer: 1592097089
Financial report context:
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

Financial table:
company/index: o 2019reilly automotive inc .; december 31 , 2012: $ 100; december 31 , 2013: $ 144; december 31 , 2014: $ 215; december 31 , 2015: $ 283; december 31 , 2016: $ 311; december 31 , 2017: $ 269
company/index: s&p 500 retail index; december 31 , 2012: 100; december 31 , 2013: 144; december 31 , 2014: 158; december 31 , 2015: 197; december 31 , 2016: 206; december 31 , 2017: 265
company/index: s&p 500; december 31 , 2012: $ 100; december 31 , 2013: $ 130; december 31 , 2014: $ 144; december 31 , 2015: $ 143; december 31 , 2016: $ 157; december 31 , 2017: $ 187

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in s&p500 from 2014 to 2016?
Answer: 9.0%