alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
item 2 : properties information concerning applied 2019s properties is set forth below: .

Financial table:
( square feet in thousands ): owned; united states: 4530; other countries: 2417; total: 6947
( square feet in thousands ): leased; united states: 1037; other countries: 1341; total: 2378
( square feet in thousands ): total; united states: 5567; other countries: 3758; total: 9325

Additional report context:
because of the interrelation of applied 2019s operations , properties within a country may be shared by the segments operating within that country . the company 2019s headquarters offices are in santa clara , california . products in semiconductor systems are manufactured in santa clara , california ; austin , texas ; gloucester , massachusetts ; kalispell , montana ; rehovot , israel ; and singapore . remanufactured equipment products in the applied global services segment are produced primarily in austin , texas . products in the display and adjacent markets segment are manufactured in alzenau , germany and tainan , taiwan . other products are manufactured in treviso , italy . applied also owns and leases offices , plants and warehouse locations in many locations throughout the world , including in europe , japan , north america ( principally the united states ) , israel , china , india , korea , southeast asia and taiwan . these facilities are principally used for manufacturing ; research , development and engineering ; and marketing , sales and customer support . applied also owns a total of approximately 269 acres of buildable land in montana , texas , california , israel and italy that could accommodate additional building space . applied considers the properties that it owns or leases as adequate to meet its current and future requirements . applied regularly assesses the size , capability and location of its global infrastructure and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments. .

Question: what portion of total company used area is company owned?
Answer: 74.5%
Financial report context:
28 , 35 , or 90 days . the funds associated with failed auctions will not be accessible until a successful auction occurs or a buyer is found outside of the auction process . based on broker- dealer valuation models and an analysis of other-than-temporary impairment factors , auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007 . this write-down resulted in an 201cother-than-temporary 201d impairment charge of approximately $ 8 million ( pre-tax ) included in net income and a temporary impairment charge of $ 10 million ( pre-tax ) reflected as an unrealized loss within other comprehensive income for 2007 . as of december 31 , 2007 , these investments in auction rate securities have been in a loss position for less than six months . these auction rate securities are classified as non-current marketable securities as of december 31 , 2007 as indicated in the preceding table . 3m reviews impairments associated with the above in accordance with emerging issues task force ( eitf ) 03-1 and fsp sfas 115-1 and 124-1 , 201cthe meaning of other-than-temporary-impairment and its application to certain investments , 201d to determine the classification of the impairment as 201ctemporary 201d or 201cother-than-temporary . 201d a temporary impairment charge results in an unrealized loss being recorded in the other comprehensive income component of stockholders 2019 equity . such an unrealized loss does not reduce net income for the applicable accounting period because the loss is not viewed as other-than-temporary . the company believes that a portion of the impairment of its auction rate securities investments is temporary and a portion is other-than-temporary . the factors evaluated to differentiate between temporary and other-than-temporary include the projected future cash flows , credit ratings actions , and assessment of the credit quality of the underlying collateral . the balance at december 31 , 2007 for marketable securities and short-term investments by contractual maturity are shown below . actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because the issuers of the securities may have the right to prepay obligations without prepayment penalties . dec . 31 , ( millions ) 2007 .

Financial table:
( millions ): due in one year or less; dec . 31 2007: $ 231
( millions ): due after one year through three years; dec . 31 2007: 545
( millions ): due after three years through five years; dec . 31 2007: 221
( millions ): due after five years; dec . 31 2007: 62
( millions ): total marketable securities; dec . 31 2007: $ 1059

Additional report context:
predetermined intervals , usually every 7 .

Question: what was the rate of the adjustment of the auction rate securities with an original par value of approximately $ 34 million were written-down to an estimated fair value of $ 16 million as of december 31 , 2007.\\n
Answer: 52.9%
Financial report context:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 25 , 2009 through october 26 , 2014 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 25 , 2009 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

Financial table:
10/25/2009: applied materials; 10/31/2010: 100.00; 10/30/2011: 97.43; 10/28/2012: 101.85; 10/27/2013: 88.54; 10/26/2014: 151.43; column_7: 183.29
10/25/2009: s&p 500 index; 10/31/2010: 100.00; 10/30/2011: 116.52; 10/28/2012: 125.94; 10/27/2013: 145.09; 10/26/2014: 184.52; column_7: 216.39
10/25/2009: rdg semiconductor composite index; 10/31/2010: 100.00; 10/30/2011: 121.00; 10/28/2012: 132.42; 10/27/2013: 124.95; 10/26/2014: 163.20; column_7: 207.93

Additional report context:
dividends during fiscal 2014 , applied 2019s board of directors declared four quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each . during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 . dividends declared during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 totaled $ 487 million , $ 469 million and $ 438 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders . $ 100 invested on 10/25/09 in stock or 10/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . and the rdg semiconductor composite index 183145 97 102 121 132 10/25/09 10/31/10 10/30/11 10/28/12 10/27/13 10/26/14 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite .

Question: how much more return was given for investing in the overall market rather than applied materials from 2009 to 2014 ? ( in a percentage )
Answer: 33.1%
Financial report context:
12 . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables the company has receivables and payables for financial instruments sold to and purchased from brokers , dealers and customers , which arise in the ordinary course of business . citi is exposed to risk of loss from the inability of brokers , dealers or customers to pay for purchases or to deliver the financial instruments sold , in which case citi would have to sell or purchase the financial instruments at prevailing market prices . credit risk is reduced to the extent that an exchange or clearing organization acts as a counterparty to the transaction and replaces the broker , dealer or customer in question . citi seeks to protect itself from the risks associated with customer activities by requiring customers to maintain margin collateral in compliance with regulatory and internal guidelines . margin levels are monitored daily , and customers deposit additional collateral as required . where customers cannot meet collateral requirements , citi may liquidate sufficient underlying financial instruments to bring the customer into compliance with the required margin level . exposure to credit risk is impacted by market volatility , which may impair the ability of clients to satisfy their obligations to citi . credit limits are established and closely monitored for customers and for brokers and dealers engaged in forwards , futures and other transactions deemed to be credit sensitive . brokerage receivables and brokerage payables consisted of the following: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: receivables from customers; december 31 , 2018: $ 14415; december 31 , 2017: $ 19215
in millions of dollars: receivables from brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2018: 21035; december 31 , 2017: 19169
in millions of dollars: total brokerage receivables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2018: $ 35450; december 31 , 2017: $ 38384
in millions of dollars: payables to customers; december 31 , 2018: $ 40273; december 31 , 2017: $ 38741
in millions of dollars: payables to brokers dealers and clearing organizations; december 31 , 2018: 24298; december 31 , 2017: 22601
in millions of dollars: total brokerage payables ( 1 ); december 31 , 2018: $ 64571; december 31 , 2017: $ 61342

Additional report context:
total brokerage payables ( 1 ) $ 64571 $ 61342 ( 1 ) includes brokerage receivables and payables recorded by citi broker-dealer entities that are accounted for in accordance with the aicpa accounting guide for brokers and dealers in securities as codified in asc 940-320. .

Question: in 2018 what was the ratio of the total brokerage payables to total brokerage receivables
Answer: 1.8
Financial report context:
entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 933.6
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: -20.1 ( 20.1 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -5.2 ( 5.2 )
amount ( in millions ): fuel recovery; column_2: 14.8
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: 12.4
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -2.1 ( 2.1 )
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 933.4

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing . see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer . the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .

Question: by what percentage point did the net income margin improve in 2011?
Answer: 1.3
Financial report context:
maturities of long-term debt in each of the next five years and beyond are as follows: .

Financial table:
2014: 2015; $ 907.4: 453.0
2014: 2016; $ 907.4: 433.0
2014: 2017; $ 907.4: 453.8
2014: 2018; $ 907.4: 439.9
2014: thereafter; $ 907.4: 2876.6
2014: total; $ 907.4: $ 5563.7

Additional report context:
on 4 february 2013 , we issued a $ 400.0 senior fixed-rate 2.75% ( 2.75 % ) note that matures on 3 february 2023 . additionally , on 7 august 2013 , we issued a 2.0% ( 2.0 % ) eurobond for 20ac300 million ( $ 397 ) that matures on 7 august 2020 . various debt agreements to which we are a party also include financial covenants and other restrictions , including restrictions pertaining to the ability to create property liens and enter into certain sale and leaseback transactions . as of 30 september 2013 , we are in compliance with all the financial and other covenants under our debt agreements . as of 30 september 2013 , we have classified commercial paper of $ 400.0 maturing in 2014 as long-term debt because we have the ability and intent to refinance the debt under our $ 2500.0 committed credit facility maturing in 2018 . our current intent is to refinance this debt via the u.s . public or private placement markets . on 30 april 2013 , we entered into a five-year $ 2500.0 revolving credit agreement with a syndicate of banks ( the 201c2013 credit agreement 201d ) , under which senior unsecured debt is available to us and certain of our subsidiaries . the 2013 credit agreement provides us with a source of liquidity and supports our commercial paper program . this agreement increases the previously existing facility by $ 330.0 , extends the maturity date to 30 april 2018 , and modifies the financial covenant to a maximum ratio of total debt to total capitalization ( total debt plus total equity plus redeemable noncontrolling interest ) no greater than 70% ( 70 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the 2013 credit agreement as of 30 september 2013 . the 2013 credit agreement terminates and replaces our previous $ 2170.0 revolving credit agreement dated 8 july 2010 , as subsequently amended , which was to mature 30 june 2015 and had a financial covenant of long-term debt divided by the sum of long-term debt plus equity of no greater than 60% ( 60 % ) . no borrowings were outstanding under the previous agreement at the time of its termination and no early termination penalties were incurred . effective 11 june 2012 , we entered into an offshore chinese renminbi ( rmb ) syndicated credit facility of rmb1000.0 million ( $ 163.5 ) , maturing in june 2015 . there are rmb250.0 million ( $ 40.9 ) in outstanding borrowings under this commitment at 30 september 2013 . additional commitments totaling $ 383.0 are maintained by our foreign subsidiaries , of which $ 309.0 was borrowed and outstanding at 30 september 2013. .

Question: what is going to be the matured value of the eurobond issued in 2013 , in millions?
Answer: 456.55
Financial report context:
the graph below shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative shareholder return on the company's common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p smallcap 600 index and the s&p 600 electrical equipment index , all of which are published indices . comparison of five-year cumulative total return from december 31 , 2002 to december 31 , 2007 assumes $ 100 invested with reinvestment of dividends period indexed returns .

Financial table:
company/index: a o smith corp; baseperiod 12/31/02: 100.00; baseperiod 12/31/03: 132.23; baseperiod 12/31/04: 115.36; baseperiod 12/31/05: 138.20; baseperiod 12/31/06: 150.26; 12/31/07: 142.72
company/index: s&p smallcap 600 index; baseperiod 12/31/02: 100.00; baseperiod 12/31/03: 138.79; baseperiod 12/31/04: 170.22; baseperiod 12/31/05: 183.30; baseperiod 12/31/06: 211.01; 12/31/07: 210.39
company/index: s&p 600 electrical equipment; baseperiod 12/31/02: 100.00; baseperiod 12/31/03: 126.12; baseperiod 12/31/04: 152.18; baseperiod 12/31/05: 169.07; baseperiod 12/31/06: 228.83; 12/31/07: 253.33

Additional report context:
12/31/02 12/31/03 12/31/04 12/31/05 12/31/06 12/31/07 smith ( a o ) corp s&p smallcap 600 index s&p 600 electrical equipment .

Question: what was the difference in cumulative total return for the five year period ending 12/31/07 between a o smith corp and the s&p 600 electrical equipment?
Answer: -110.61%
Financial report context:
loan commitments ( unfunded loans and unused lines of credit ) , asset purchase agreements , standby letters of credit and letters of credit are issued to accommodate the financing needs of state street 2019s clients and to provide credit enhancements to special purpose entities . loan commitments are agreements by state street to lend monies at a future date . asset purchase agreements are commitments to purchase receivables or securities , subject to conditions established in the agreements , and at december 31 , 2001 , include $ 8.0 billion outstanding to special purpose entities . standby letters of credit and letters of credit commit state street to make payments on behalf of clients and special purpose entities when certain specified events occur . standby letters of credit outstanding to special purpose entities were $ 608 million at december 31 , 2001 . these loan , asset purchase and letter of credit commitments are subject to the same credit policies and reviews as loans . the amount and nature of collateral are obtained based upon management 2019s assessment of the credit risk . approximately 89% ( 89 % ) of the loan commitments and asset purchase agreements expire within one year from the date of issue . sincemany of the commitments are expected to expire or renewwithout being drawn , the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements . the following is a summary of the contractual amount of credit-related , off-balance sheet financial instruments at december 31: .

Financial table:
( dollars in millions ): indemnified securities on loan; 2001: $ 113047; 2000: $ 101438
( dollars in millions ): loan commitments; 2001: 12962; 2000: 11367
( dollars in millions ): asset purchase agreements; 2001: 10366; 2000: 7112
( dollars in millions ): standby letters of credit; 2001: 3918; 2000: 4028
( dollars in millions ): letters of credit; 2001: 164; 2000: 218

Additional report context:
state street corporation 53 .

Question: what is the percentage change in the balance of loan commitments from 2000 to 2001?
Answer: 14.0%
Financial report context:
apple inc . | 2016 form 10-k | 20 company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 24 , 2016 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 23 , 2011 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/23/11 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019s common stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2016 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2016 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Financial table:
september2011: apple inc .; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 166; september2014: $ 123; september2015: $ 183; september2016: $ 212; column_7: $ 213
september2011: s&p 500 index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 130; september2014: $ 155; september2015: $ 186; september2016: $ 185; column_7: $ 213
september2011: s&p information technology index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 132; september2014: $ 142; september2015: $ 183; september2016: $ 187; column_7: $ 230
september2011: dow jones u.s . technology supersector index; september2012: $ 100; september2013: $ 130; september2014: $ 137; september2015: $ 178; september2016: $ 177; column_7: $ 217

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the cumulative change in apple inc . stock between 2016 and 2011?
Answer: 113