alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes . 2019 2019 the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Financial table:
2002 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 17.84: 9.17; low $ 4.11: 3.55; 2001 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 60.15: 52.25; low $ 41.30: 39.95
2002 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 17.84: 4.61; low $ 4.11: 1.56; 2001 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 60.15: 44.50; low $ 41.30: 12.00
2002 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 17.84: 3.57; low $ 4.11: 0.95; 2001 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 60.15: 17.80; low $ 41.30: 11.60

Additional report context:
holders . as of march 3 , 2003 , there were 9663 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s senior secured credit facilities entered into with a commercial bank syndicate , the company is not allowed to pay cash dividends . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see the information contained under the caption 2018 2018securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans 2019 2019 of the proxy statement for the annual meeting of stockholders of the registrant to be held on may 1 , 2003 , which information is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the average high and low stock price for the second quarter of 2002?
Answer: 6.36
Financial report context:
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Financial table:
company index: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ); november 17 2011: $ 100.00; december 31 2011: $ 100.98; december 31 2012: $ 179.33; december 31 2013: $ 285.81; december 31 2014: $ 350.82
company index: s&p 500 ( 2 ); november 17 2011: 100.00; december 31 2011: 100.80; december 31 2012: 116.93; december 31 2013: 154.80; december 31 2014: 175.99
company index: automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ); november 17 2011: 100.00; december 31 2011: 89.27; december 31 2012: 110.41; december 31 2013: 166.46; december 31 2014: 178.05

Additional report context:
dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 . in addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .

Question: what was the percentage total return for delphi automotive plc for the five years ended december 31 2014?\\n
Answer: 250.82%
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries management's financial discussion and analysis the decrease in interest income in 2002 was primarily due to : fffd interest recognized in 2001 on grand gulf 1's decommissioning trust funds resulting from the final order addressing system energy's rate proceeding ; fffd interest recognized in 2001 at entergy mississippi and entergy new orleans on the deferred system energy costs that were not being recovered through rates ; and fffd lower interest earned on declining deferred fuel balances . the decrease in interest charges in 2002 is primarily due to : fffd a decrease of $ 31.9 million in interest on long-term debt primarily due to the retirement of long-term debt in late 2001 and early 2002 ; and fffd a decrease of $ 76.0 million in other interest expense primarily due to interest recorded on system energy's reserve for rate refund in 2001 . the refund was made in december 2001 . 2001 compared to 2000 results for the year ended december 31 , 2001 for u.s . utility were also affected by an increase in interest charges of $ 61.5 million primarily due to : fffd the final ferc order addressing the 1995 system energy rate filing ; fffd debt issued at entergy arkansas in july 2001 , at entergy gulf states in june 2000 and august 2001 , at entergy mississippi in january 2001 , and at entergy new orleans in july 2000 and february 2001 ; and fffd borrowings under credit facilities during 2001 , primarily at entergy arkansas . non-utility nuclear the increase in earnings in 2002 for non-utility nuclear from $ 128 million to $ 201 million was primarily due to the operation of indian point 2 and vermont yankee , which were purchased in september 2001 and july 2002 , respectively . the increase in earnings in 2001 for non-utility nuclear from $ 49 million to $ 128 million was primarily due to the operation of fitzpatrick and indian point 3 for a full year , as each was purchased in november 2000 , and the operation of indian point 2 , which was purchased in september 2001 . following are key performance measures for non-utility nuclear: .

Financial table:
2002: net mw in operation at december 31; 2001: 3955; 2000: 3445; column_4: 2475
2002: generation in gwh for the year; 2001: 29953; 2000: 22614; column_4: 7171
2002: capacity factor for the year; 2001: 93% ( 93 % ); 2000: 93% ( 93 % ); column_4: 94% ( 94 % )

Additional report context:
2002 compared to 2001 the following fluctuations in the results of operations for non-utility nuclear in 2002 were primarily caused by the acquisitions of indian point 2 and vermont yankee ( except as otherwise noted ) : fffd operating revenues increased $ 411.0 million to $ 1.2 billion ; fffd other operation and maintenance expenses increased $ 201.8 million to $ 596.3 million ; fffd depreciation and amortization expenses increased $ 25.1 million to $ 42.8 million ; fffd fuel expenses increased $ 29.4 million to $ 105.2 million ; fffd nuclear refueling outage expenses increased $ 23.9 million to $ 46.8 million , which was due primarily to a .

Question: in 2002 what was the ratio of the net mw in operation to the generation in gwh for the year
Answer: 13.2%
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 27.4 million primarily due to higher nuclear refueling outage expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , and higher interest expense , partially offset by higher other income . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 92.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate and higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . a0 a0following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 1520.5
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 33.8
amount ( in millions ): opportunity sales; column_2: 5.6
amount ( in millions ): asset retirement obligation; column_2: -14.8 ( 14.8 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -29.0 ( 29.0 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 6.5
amount ( in millions ): 2017 net revenue; column_2: $ 1522.6

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to the implementation of formula rate plan rates effective with the first billing cycle of january 2017 and an increase in base rates effective february 24 , 2016 , each as approved by the apsc . a significant portion of the base rate increase was related to the purchase of power block 2 of the union power station in march 2016 . the increase was partially offset by decreases in the energy efficiency rider , as approved by the apsc , effective april 2016 and january 2017 . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the rate case and formula rate plan filings . see note 14 to the financial statements for further discussion of the union power station purchase . the opportunity sales variance results from the estimated net revenue effect of the 2017 and 2016 ferc orders in the opportunity sales proceeding attributable to wholesale customers . see note 2 to the financial statements for further discussion of the opportunity sales proceeding. .

Question: what percent increase in net income was experienced between 2015 and 2016
Answer: .0651
Financial report context:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2015 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2010 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Financial table:
2010: loews common stock; 2011: 100.0; 2012: 97.37; 2013: 106.04; 2014: 126.23; 2015: 110.59; column_7: 101.72
2010: s&p 500 index; 2011: 100.0; 2012: 102.11; 2013: 118.45; 2014: 156.82; 2015: 178.29; column_7: 180.75
2010: loews peer group ( a ); 2011: 100.0; 2012: 101.59; 2013: 115.19; 2014: 145.12; 2015: 152.84; column_7: 144.70

Additional report context:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2015 and 2014. .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in loews common stock from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: -2.6%
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) fiscal years ended may 25 , 2008 , may 27 , 2007 , and may 28 , 2006 columnar amounts in millions except per share amounts administrative expenses , including the reclassification of the cumulative after-tax charges of $ 21.9 million from accumulated other comprehensive income . during fiscal 2007 , the company closed on the sale of these notes for approximately $ 117 million , net of transaction expenses , resulting in no additional gain or loss . 8 . inventories the major classes of inventories are as follows: .

Financial table:
2008: raw materials and packaging; 2007: $ 580.8; column_3: $ 458.5
2008: work in progress; 2007: 100.0; column_3: 94.6
2008: finished goods; 2007: 1179.1; column_3: 1001.3
2008: supplies and other; 2007: 71.6; column_3: 70.7
2008: total; 2007: $ 1931.5; column_3: $ 1625.1

Additional report context:
9 . credit facilities and borrowings at may 25 , 2008 , the company had credit lines from banks that totaled approximately $ 2.3 billion . these lines are comprised of a $ 1.5 billion multi-year revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions which matures in december 2011 , uncommitted short-term loan facilities approximating $ 364 million , and uncommitted trade finance facilities approximating $ 424 million . borrowings under the multi-year facility bear interest at or below prime rate and may be prepaid without penalty . the company has not drawn upon this multi- year facility . the uncommitted trade finance facilities mentioned above were maintained in order to finance certain working capital needs of the company 2019s trading and merchandising operations . subsequent to the sale of this business in june 2008 , the company exited these facilities . the company finances its short-term liquidity needs with bank borrowings , commercial paper borrowings , and bankers 2019 acceptances . as of may 25 , 2008 , the company had outstanding borrowings of $ 578.3 million , primarily under the commercial paper arrangements . the weighted average interest rate on these borrowings as of may 25 , 2008 was 2.76% ( 2.76 % ) . the average consolidated short-term borrowings outstanding under these facilities were $ 418.5 million and $ 4.3 million for fiscal 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what percentage of total inventories is comprised of finished goods in 2007?
Answer: 62%
Financial report context:
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . 2015 compared to 2014 net income decreased $ 5.2 million primarily due to the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility and higher other operation and maintenance expenses , partially offset by higher net revenue and a lower effective tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 637.2
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: 14.3
amount ( in millions ): purchased power capacity; column_2: 12.4
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: 7.0
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 5.4
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale; column_2: -27.8 ( 27.8 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -4.3 ( 4.3 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 644.2

Additional report context:
the reserve equalization variance is primarily due to a reduction in reserve equalization expense primarily due to changes in the entergy system generation mix compared to the same period in 2015 as a result of the execution of a new purchased power agreement and entergy mississippi 2019s exit from the system agreement , each in november 2015 , and entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to decreased expenses due to the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 , as well as capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to an increase in attachment o rates charged by miso to transmission customers and a settlement of attachment o rates previously billed to transmission customers by miso. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2016 for entergy texas , inc.?
Answer: 7
Financial report context:
part ii . item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities our common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol cdns . as of february 2 , 2019 , we had 523 registered stockholders and approximately 56000 beneficial owners of our common stock . stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock and in each index on december 28 , 2013 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of our fiscal year through december 29 , 2018 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar year . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index 12/29/181/2/16 12/30/1712/28/13 12/31/161/3/15 *$ 100 invested on 12/28/13 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 29 . copyright a9 2019 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . nasdaq compositecadence design systems , inc . s&p 500 s&p 500 information technology .

Financial table:
12/28/2013: cadence design systems inc .; 1/3/2015: $ 100.00; 1/2/2016: $ 135.18; 12/31/2016: $ 149.39; 12/30/2017: $ 181.05; 12/29/2018: $ 300.22; column_7: $ 311.13
12/28/2013: nasdaq composite; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 112.60; 12/31/2016: 113.64; 12/30/2017: 133.19; 12/29/2018: 172.11; column_7: 165.84
12/28/2013: s&p 500; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 110.28; 12/31/2016: 109.54; 12/30/2017: 129.05; 12/29/2018: 157.22; column_7: 150.33
12/28/2013: s&p 500 information technology; 1/3/2015: 100.00; 1/2/2016: 115.49; 12/31/2016: 121.08; 12/30/2017: 144.85; 12/29/2018: 201.10; column_7: 200.52

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . for the period ending 12/29/2018?
Answer: 211.13%
Financial report context:
five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2007 , assuming that dividends were reinvested . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) and a peer group . snap-on incorporated total shareholder return ( 1 ) fiscal year ended ( 2 ) snap-on incorporated peer group ( 3 ) s&p 500 .

Financial table:
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2007; snap-onincorporated: $ 100.00; peer group ( 3 ): $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2008; snap-onincorporated: 83.66; peer group ( 3 ): 66.15; s&p 500: 63.00
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2009; snap-onincorporated: 93.20; peer group ( 3 ): 84.12; s&p 500: 79.67
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2010; snap-onincorporated: 128.21; peer group ( 3 ): 112.02; s&p 500: 91.67
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2011; snap-onincorporated: 117.47; peer group ( 3 ): 109.70; s&p 500: 93.61
fiscal year ended ( 2 ): december 31 2012; snap-onincorporated: 187.26; peer group ( 3 ): 129.00; s&p 500: 108.59

Additional report context:
( 1 ) assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that dividends were reinvested quarterly . ( 2 ) the company's fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31 . ( 3 ) the peer group consists of : stanley black & decker , inc. , danaher corporation , emerson electric co. , genuine parts company , newell rubbermaid inc. , pentair ltd. , spx corporation and w.w . grainger , inc . cooper industries plc , a former member of the peer group , was removed , as it was acquired by a larger , non-comparable company in 2012 . 2012 annual report 23 snap-on incorporated peer group s&p 500 2007 2008 201120102009 2012 .

Question: what was the ratio of the snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index in 2012
Answer: 1.72