alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures the 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 $ 276 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2030 . these debentures have an 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) interest rate until april 1 , 2020 , and , thereafter , the interest rate will be 7.62% ( 7.62 % ) for the final 10 years . these debentures are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time . the redemption price is equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption ( at a benchmark treasury yield plus five basis points ) plus accrued interest . 2022 $ 424 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2020 . these debentures are not subject to redemption prior to maturity . interest is payable semiannually in april and october for both tranches and neither tranche is subject to sinking fund requirements . we subsequently entered into interest rate swaps on the 2020 debentures , which effectively converted the fixed interest rates on the debentures to variable libor-based interest rates . the average interest rate payable on the 2020 debentures , including the impact of the interest rate swaps , for 2016 and 2015 was 5.43% ( 5.43 % ) and 5.04% ( 5.04 % ) , respectively . floating rate senior notes the floating rate senior notes bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2016 and 2015 was 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) and 0.01% ( 0.01 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after 10 years at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2066 . in march , june and august 2016 , we issued floating rate senior notes in principal balances of $ 118 , $ 74 and $ 35 million , respectively . these notes bear interest at three-month libor less 30 basis points and mature in 2066 . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .

Financial table:
2016: vehicles; 2015: $ 68; column_3: $ 74
2016: aircraft; 2015: 2291; column_3: 2289
2016: buildings; 2015: 190; column_3: 207
2016: accumulated amortization; 2015: -896 ( 896 ); column_3: -849 ( 849 )
2016: property plant and equipment subject to capital leases; 2015: $ 1653; column_3: $ 1721

Additional report context:
these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2017 through 3005. .

Question: what was the change in millions of vehicles from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -6
Financial report context:
table of contents part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2013 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 39.60 . holders there were 33 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2013 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2012 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.11 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2013 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.13 per share payable on february 28 , 2013 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 14 , 2013 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , and contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to the parent and any other such factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .

Financial table:
2012:: january 1 2012 to march 31 2012; high: $ 37.79; low: $ 29.26
2012:: april 1 2012 to june 30 2012; high: $ 37.65; low: $ 26.22
2012:: july 1 2012 to september 30 2012; high: $ 34.00; low: $ 26.88
2012:: october 1 2012 to december 31 2012; high: $ 35.30; low: $ 29.00
2012:: 2011:; high: high; low: low
2012:: january 1 2011 to march 31 2011; high: $ 24.19; low: $ 19.78
2012:: april 1 2011 to june 30 2011; high: $ 25.22; low: $ 21.00
2012:: july 1 2011 to september 30 2011; high: $ 30.75; low: $ 23.41
2012:: october 1 2011 to december 31 2011; high: $ 31.16; low: $ 24.57

Additional report context:
.

Question: by how much did the low of mktx stock increase from 2011 to march 2012?
Answer: 19.1%
Financial report context:
measurement point december 31 the priceline group nasdaq composite index s&p 500 rdg internet composite .

Financial table:
measurement pointdecember 31: 2011; the priceline group inc .: 100.00; nasdaqcomposite index: 100.00; s&p 500index: 100.00; rdg internetcomposite: 100.00
measurement pointdecember 31: 2012; the priceline group inc .: 132.64; nasdaqcomposite index: 116.41; s&p 500index: 116.00; rdg internetcomposite: 119.34
measurement pointdecember 31: 2013; the priceline group inc .: 248.53; nasdaqcomposite index: 165.47; s&p 500index: 153.58; rdg internetcomposite: 195.83
measurement pointdecember 31: 2014; the priceline group inc .: 243.79; nasdaqcomposite index: 188.69; s&p 500index: 174.60; rdg internetcomposite: 192.42
measurement pointdecember 31: 2015; the priceline group inc .: 272.59; nasdaqcomposite index: 200.32; s&p 500index: 177.01; rdg internetcomposite: 264.96
measurement pointdecember 31: 2016; the priceline group inc .: 313.45; nasdaqcomposite index: 216.54; s&p 500index: 198.18; rdg internetcomposite: 277.56

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage change in priceline group and the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2016?
Answer: 115.27%
Financial report context:
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock on january 2 , 2010 and in each index on december 31 , 2009 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of cadence 2019s fiscal year through january 3 , 2015 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/28/13 1/3/151/1/11 12/31/11 12/29/121/2/10 *$ 100 invested on 1/2/10 in stock or 12/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
1/2/2010: cadence design systems inc .; 1/1/2011: 100.00; 12/31/2011: 137.90; 12/29/2012: 173.62; 12/28/2013: 224.37; 1/3/2015: 232.55; column_7: 314.36
1/2/2010: nasdaq composite; 1/1/2011: 100.00; 12/31/2011: 117.61; 12/29/2012: 118.70; 12/28/2013: 139.00; 1/3/2015: 196.83; column_7: 223.74
1/2/2010: s&p 400 information technology; 1/1/2011: 100.00; 12/31/2011: 128.72; 12/29/2012: 115.22; 12/28/2013: 135.29; 1/3/2015: 173.25; column_7: 187.84

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what is the rate of return in nasdaq of an investment from 2010 to 2011?
Answer: 17.6%
Financial report context:
6 . principal transactions citi 2019s principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities . trading activities include revenues from fixed income , equities , credit and commodities products and foreign exchange transactions that are managed on a portfolio basis characterized by primary risk . not included in the table below is the impact of net interest revenue related to trading activities , which is an integral part of trading activities 2019 profitability . for additional information regarding principal transactions revenue , see note a04 to the consolidated financial statements for information about net interest revenue related to trading activities . principal transactions include cva ( credit valuation adjustments on derivatives ) and fva ( funding valuation adjustments ) on over-the-counter derivatives . these adjustments are discussed further in note 24 to the consolidated financial statements . the following table presents principal transactions revenue: .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: interest rate risks ( 1 ); 2018: $ 5186; 2017: $ 5301; 2016: $ 4229
in millions of dollars: foreign exchange risks ( 2 ); 2018: 1423; 2017: 2435; 2016: 1699
in millions of dollars: equity risks ( 3 ); 2018: 1346; 2017: 525; 2016: 330
in millions of dollars: commodity and other risks ( 4 ); 2018: 662; 2017: 425; 2016: 899
in millions of dollars: credit products and risks ( 5 ); 2018: 445; 2017: 789; 2016: 700
in millions of dollars: total; 2018: $ 9062; 2017: $ 9475; 2016: $ 7857

Additional report context:
( 1 ) includes revenues from government securities and corporate debt , municipal securities , mortgage securities and other debt instruments . also includes spot and forward trading of currencies and exchange-traded and over-the-counter ( otc ) currency options , options on fixed income securities , interest rate swaps , currency swaps , swap options , caps and floors , financial futures , otc options and forward contracts on fixed income securities . ( 2 ) includes revenues from foreign exchange spot , forward , option and swap contracts , as well as foreign currency translation ( fx translation ) gains and losses . ( 3 ) includes revenues from common , preferred and convertible preferred stock , convertible corporate debt , equity-linked notes and exchange-traded and otc equity options and warrants . ( 4 ) primarily includes revenues from crude oil , refined oil products , natural gas and other commodities trades . ( 5 ) includes revenues from structured credit products. .

Question: what was the percent change of the principal transactions revenue associated with interest rate risks from 2016 to 2017
Answer: 25.3%
Financial report context:
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .

Financial table:
issued: balance january 1 2010; in treasury: 1334; shares outstanding: -139 ( 139 ); column_4: 1195
issued: acquisition of smith international inc .; in treasury: 100; shares outstanding: 76; column_4: 176
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 6; column_4: 6
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 3; column_4: 3
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -27 ( 27 ); column_4: -27 ( 27 )
issued: issued on conversions of debentures; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 8; column_4: 8
issued: balance december 31 2010; in treasury: 1434; shares outstanding: -73 ( 73 ); column_4: 1361
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 6; column_4: 6
issued: vesting of restricted stock; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 1; column_4: 1
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 3; column_4: 3
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -37 ( 37 ); column_4: -37 ( 37 )
issued: balance december 31 2011; in treasury: 1434; shares outstanding: -100 ( 100 ); column_4: 1334
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 4; column_4: 4
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 4; column_4: 4
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -14 ( 14 ); column_4: -14 ( 14 )
issued: balance december 31 2012; in treasury: 1434; shares outstanding: -106 ( 106 ); column_4: 1328

Additional report context:
see the notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: the stock repurchase program reduced shares outstanding by how many million shares in the period?
Answer: 64
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss , net of related tax , are as follows: .

Financial table:
( millions ) as of december 31: net derivative gains ( losses ); 2007: $ 24; 2006: $ 15; 2005: $ -11 ( 11 )
( millions ) as of december 31: net unrealized investment gains; 2007: 76; 2006: 73; 2005: 52
( millions ) as of december 31: net foreign exchange translation; 2007: 284; 2006: 118; 2005: -119 ( 119 )
( millions ) as of december 31: postretirement plans; 2007: -1110 ( 1110 ); 2006: -1216 ( 1216 ); 2005: -1077 ( 1077 )
( millions ) as of december 31: accumulated other comprehensive loss; 2007: $ -726 ( 726 ); 2006: $ -1010 ( 1010 ); 2005: $ -1155 ( 1155 )

Additional report context:
aon corporation .

Question: what are the average net unrealized investment gains for the period?
Answer: 67
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 . the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Financial table:
2001 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 60.15: 52.25; low $ 41.30: 39.95; 2000 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 44.72: 49.63; low $ 34.25: 35.56
2001 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 60.15: 44.50; low $ 41.30: 12.00; 2000 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 44.72: 70.25; low $ 34.25: 45.13
2001 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 60.15: 17.80; low $ 41.30: 11.60; 2000 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 44.72: 72.81; low $ 34.25: 45.00

Additional report context:
( b ) holders . as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . ( c ) dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was the 2001 first quarter average of high and low stock prices?
Answer: 50.73
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our common stock on the nyse for the years 2016 and 2015. .

Financial table:
2016: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 102.93; low: $ 83.07
2016: quarter ended june 30; high: 113.63; low: 101.87
2016: quarter ended september 30; high: 118.26; low: 107.57
2016: quarter ended december 31; high: 118.09; low: 99.72
2016: 2015; high: high; low: low
2016: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 101.88; low: $ 93.21
2016: quarter ended june 30; high: 98.64; low: 91.99
2016: quarter ended september 30; high: 101.54; low: 86.83
2016: quarter ended december 31; high: 104.12; low: 87.23

Additional report context:
on february 17 , 2017 , the closing price of our common stock was $ 108.11 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 17 , 2017 , we had 427195037 outstanding shares of common stock and 153 registered holders . dividends as a reit , we must annually distribute to our stockholders an amount equal to at least 90% ( 90 % ) of our reit taxable income ( determined before the deduction for distributed earnings and excluding any net capital gain ) . generally , we have distributed and expect to continue to distribute all or substantially all of our reit taxable income after taking into consideration our utilization of net operating losses ( 201cnols 201d ) . we have two series of preferred stock outstanding , 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series a ( the 201cseries a preferred stock 201d ) , issued in may 2014 , with a dividend rate of 5.25% ( 5.25 % ) , and the 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) mandatory convertible preferred stock , series b ( the 201cseries b preferred stock 201d ) , issued in march 2015 , with a dividend rate of 5.50% ( 5.50 % ) . dividends are payable quarterly in arrears , subject to declaration by our board of directors . the amount , timing and frequency of future distributions will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon various factors , a number of which may be beyond our control , including our financial condition and operating cash flows , the amount required to maintain our qualification for taxation as a reit and reduce any income and excise taxes that we otherwise would be required to pay , limitations on distributions in our existing and future debt and preferred equity instruments , our ability to utilize nols to offset our distribution requirements , limitations on our ability to fund distributions using cash generated through our trss and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant . we have distributed an aggregate of approximately $ 3.2 billion to our common stockholders , including the dividend paid in january 2017 , primarily subject to taxation as ordinary income. .

Question: what is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 17 , 2017?
Answer: 2792124
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index , a peer group index . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2009 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions . there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .

Financial table:
2009: vornado realty trust; 2010: $ 100; 2011: $ 123; 2012: $ 118; 2013: $ 128; 2014: $ 147; column_7: $ 201
2009: s&p 500 index; 2010: 100; 2011: 115; 2012: 117; 2013: 136; 2014: 180; column_7: 205
2009: the nareit all equity index; 2010: 100; 2011: 128; 2012: 139; 2013: 166; 2014: 171; column_7: 218

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the five year change in the s&p 500 index?
Answer: 105
Financial report context:
net impairment we recognized $ 16.9 million and $ 14.9 million of net impairment during the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , on certain securities in our non-agency cmo portfolio due to continued deterioration in the expected credit performance of the underlying loans in those specific securities . the gross other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ) and the noncredit portion of otti , which was or had been previously recorded through other comprehensive income ( loss ) , are shown in the table below ( dollars in millions ) : year ended december 31 , 2012 2011 .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 2012: other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ); 2011: $ -19.8 ( 19.8 ); column_3: $ -9.2 ( 9.2 )
year ended december 31 2012: less : noncredit portion of otti recognized into ( out of ) other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( before tax ); 2011: 2.9; column_3: -5.7 ( 5.7 )
year ended december 31 2012: net impairment; 2011: $ -16.9 ( 16.9 ); column_3: $ -14.9 ( 14.9 )

Additional report context:
provision for loan losses provision for loan losses decreased 20% ( 20 % ) to $ 354.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 compared to 2011 . the decrease in provision for loan losses was driven primarily by improving credit trends , as evidenced by the lower levels of delinquent loans in the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolios , and loan portfolio run-off . the decrease was partially offset by $ 50 million in charge-offs associated with newly identified bankruptcy filings during the third quarter of 2012 , with approximately 80% ( 80 % ) related to prior years . we utilize third party loan servicers to obtain bankruptcy data on our borrowers and during the third quarter of 2012 , we identified an increase in bankruptcies reported by one specific servicer . in researching this increase , we discovered that the servicer had not been reporting historical bankruptcy data on a timely basis . as a result , we implemented an enhanced procedure around all servicer reporting to corroborate bankruptcy reporting with independent third party data . through this additional process , approximately $ 90 million of loans were identified in which servicers failed to report the bankruptcy filing to us , approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of which were current at the end of the third quarter of 2012 . as a result , these loans were written down to the estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs , or approximately $ 40 million , during the third quarter of 2012 . these charge-offs resulted in an increase to provision for loan losses of $ 50 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the provision for loan losses has declined four consecutive years , down 78% ( 78 % ) from its peak of $ 1.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . we expect provision for loan losses to continue to decline over the long term , although it is subject to variability in any given quarter. .

Question: what was the percentage change in otti between 2011 and 2012?
Answer: 115%