alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
consolidated 2005 results of operations was an estimated reduction of gross profit and a corresponding decrease to inventory , at cost , of $ 5.2 million . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Financial table:
land improvements: buildings; 20: 39-40
land improvements: furniture fixtures and equipment; 20: 3-10

Additional report context:
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset . impairment of long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present , the company evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets , other than goodwill , in relation to the operating performance and future cash flows or the appraised values of the underlying assets . in accordance with sfas 144 , 201caccounting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets , 201d the company reviews for impairment stores open more than two years for which current cash flows from operations are negative . impairment results when the carrying value of the assets exceeds the undiscounted future cash flows over the life of the lease . the company 2019s estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the lease term is based upon historical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability which encompasses many factors that are subject to variability and difficult to predict . if a long-lived asset is found to be impaired , the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the carrying value and the asset 2019s fair value . the fair value is estimated based primarily upon future cash flows ( discounted at the company 2019s credit adjusted risk-free rate ) or other reasonable estimates of fair market value . assets to be disposed of are adjusted to the fair value less the cost to sell if less than the book value . the company recorded impairment charges , included in sg&a expense , of approximately $ 9.4 million in 2006 , $ 0.6 million in 2005 and $ 0.2 million in 2004 to reduce the carrying value of certain of its stores 2019 assets as deemed necessary due to negative sales trends and cash flows at these locations . the majority of the 2006 charges were recorded pursuant to certain strategic initiatives discussed in note 2 . other assets other assets consist primarily of long-term investments , qualifying prepaid expenses , debt issuance costs which are amortized over the life of the related obligations , utility and security deposits , life insurance policies and goodwill. .

Question: what is the total impairment charge recorded in the lat three years , in millions?
Answer: 10.2
Financial report context:
table of contents celanese purchases of its equity securities information regarding repurchases of our common stock during the three months ended december 31 , 2017 is as follows : period number of shares purchased ( 1 ) average price paid per share total number of shares purchased as part of publicly announced program approximate dollar value of shares remaining that may be purchased under the program ( 2 ) .

Financial table:
period: october 1 - 31 2017; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 10676; averageprice paidper share: $ 104.10; total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: 2014; approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): $ 1531000000
period: november 1 - 30 2017; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 924; averageprice paidper share: $ 104.02; total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: 2014; approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): $ 1531000000
period: december 1 - 31 2017; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 38605; averageprice paidper share: $ 106.36; total numberof sharespurchased aspart of publiclyannounced program: 2014; approximatedollarvalue of sharesremaining thatmay bepurchased underthe program ( 2 ): $ 1531000000
period: total; totalnumberof sharespurchased ( 1 ): 50205; averageprice paidper share: 2014

Additional report context:
___________________________ ( 1 ) represents shares withheld from employees to cover their statutory minimum withholding requirements for personal income taxes related to the vesting of restricted stock units . ( 2 ) our board of directors has authorized the aggregate repurchase of $ 3.9 billion of our common stock since february 2008 , including an increase of $ 1.5 billion on july 17 , 2017 . see note 17 - stockholders' equity in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for further information. .

Question: what was the percent of the number of shares purchased in october 1 - 31 2017 as part of the 2017 total
Answer: 21.3%
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph is a comparison of the five-year cumulative return of our common shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index ( the 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and the national association of real estate investment trusts 2019 ( 201cnareit 201d ) all equity index ( excluding health care real estate investment trusts ) , a peer group index . the graph assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in our common shares , the s&p 500 index and the nareit all equity index and that all dividends were reinvested without the payment of any commissions . there can be no assurance that the performance of our shares will continue in line with the same or similar trends depicted in the graph below. .

Financial table:
2005: vornado realty trust; 2006: 100; 2007: 151; 2008: 113; 2009: 81; 2010: 100; column_7: 124
2005: s&p 500 index; 2006: 100; 2007: 116; 2008: 122; 2009: 77; 2010: 97; column_7: 112
2005: the nareit all equity index; 2006: 100; 2007: 135; 2008: 114; 2009: 71; 2010: 91; column_7: 116

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the average price of the the nareit all equity index from 2005 to 2009
Answer: 102.2
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements computed on a rolling 12 month basis . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana was in compliance with these provisions . as of december 31 , 2008 , entergy louisiana had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an overall implicit rate of 7.45% ( 7.45 % ) ) in connection with the waterford 3 sale and leaseback transactions , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2009; column_2: $ 32452
amount ( in thousands ): 2010; column_2: 35138
amount ( in thousands ): 2011; column_2: 50421
amount ( in thousands ): 2012; column_2: 39067
amount ( in thousands ): 2013; column_2: 26301
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: 137858
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 321237
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 73512
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 247725

Additional report context:
grand gulf lease obligations in december 1988 , in two separate but substantially identical transactions , system energy sold and leased back undivided ownership interests in grand gulf for the aggregate sum of $ 500 million . the interests represent approximately 11.5% ( 11.5 % ) of grand gulf . the leases expire in 2015 . under certain circumstances , system entergy may repurchase the leased interests prior to the end of the term of the leases . at the end of the lease terms , system energy has the option to repurchase the leased interests in grand gulf at fair market value or to renew the leases for either fair market value or , under certain conditions , a fixed rate . in may 2004 , system energy caused the grand gulf lessors to refinance the outstanding bonds that they had issued to finance the purchase of their undivided interest in grand gulf . the refinancing is at a lower interest rate , and system energy's lease payments have been reduced to reflect the lower interest costs . system energy is required to report the sale-leaseback as a financing transaction in its financial statements . for financial reporting purposes , system energy expenses the interest portion of the lease obligation and the plant depreciation . however , operating revenues include the recovery of the lease payments because the transactions are accounted for as a sale and leaseback for ratemaking purposes . consistent with a recommendation contained in a ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount of this net regulatory asset was $ 19.2 million and $ 36.6 million as of december 31 , 2008 and 2007 , respectively. .

Question: what is the growth rate in the net regulatory asset in 2008 compare 2007?
Answer: -47.5%
Financial report context:
shareowner return performance graph the following performance graph and related information shall not be deemed 201csoliciting material 201d or to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into any future filing under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates such information by reference into such filing . the following graph shows a five year comparison of cumulative total shareowners 2019 returns for our class b common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , and the dow jones transportation average . the comparison of the total cumulative return on investment , which is the change in the quarterly stock price plus reinvested dividends for each of the quarterly periods , assumes that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in the standard & poor 2019s 500 index , the dow jones transportation average , and our class b common stock. .

Financial table:
12/31/2010: united parcel service inc .; 12/31/2011: $ 100.00; 12/31/2012: $ 103.88; 12/31/2013: $ 107.87; 12/31/2014: $ 158.07; 12/31/2015: $ 171.77; column_7: $ 160.61
12/31/2010: standard & poor 2019s 500 index; 12/31/2011: $ 100.00; 12/31/2012: $ 102.11; 12/31/2013: $ 118.43; 12/31/2014: $ 156.77; 12/31/2015: $ 178.22; column_7: $ 180.67
12/31/2010: dow jones transportation average; 12/31/2011: $ 100.00; 12/31/2012: $ 100.01; 12/31/2013: $ 107.49; 12/31/2014: $ 151.97; 12/31/2015: $ 190.08; column_7: $ 158.23

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage total cumulative return on investment for united parcel service inc . compared to the standard & poor 2019s 500 index the for the five year period ending 12/31/2015?
Answer: -20.06%
Financial report context:
entergy gulf states louisiana , l.l.c . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 12.3 million primarily due to lower interest expense and lower other operation and maintenance expenses , offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax 2010 compared to 2009 net income increased $ 37.7 million primarily due to higher net revenue , a lower effective income tax rate , and lower interest expense , offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , lower other income , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 933.6
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: -20.1 ( 20.1 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -5.2 ( 5.2 )
amount ( in millions ): fuel recovery; column_2: 14.8
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: 12.4
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -2.1 ( 2.1 )
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 933.4

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in credits passed on to customers as a result of the act 55 storm cost financing . see 201cmanagement 2019s financial discussion and analysis 2013 hurricane gustav and hurricane ike 201d and note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the act 55 storm cost financing . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to less favorable weather on the residential sector as well as the unbilled sales period . the decrease was partially offset by an increase of 62 gwh , or 0.3% ( 0.3 % ) , in billed electricity usage , primarily due to increased consumption by an industrial customer as a result of the customer 2019s cogeneration outage and the addition of a new production unit by the industrial customer . the fuel recovery variance resulted primarily from an adjustment to deferred fuel costs in 2010 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of fuel recovery. .

Question: what as the percent of the net revenue from transmission in 2011
Answer: 1.3%
Financial report context:
host hotels & resorts , inc. , host hotels & resorts , l.p. , and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received , was $ 40 million , $ 15 million , and $ 9 million in 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 , respectively . a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows ( in millions ) : .

Financial table:
2017: balance at january 1; 2016: $ 11; column_3: $ 11
2017: balance at december 31; 2016: $ 11; column_3: $ 11

Additional report context:
all of such uncertain tax position amounts , if recognized , would impact our reconciliation between the income tax provision calculated at the statutory u.s . federal income tax rate of 35% ( 35 % ) ( 21% ( 21 % ) beginning with calendar year 2018 ) and the actual income tax provision recorded each year . as of december 31 , 2017 , the tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions generally include 2014-2017 . there were no material interest or penalties recorded for the years ended december 31 , 2017 , 2016 , and 2015 . 7 . leases taxable reit subsidiaries leases we lease substantially all of our hotels to a wholly owned subsidiary that qualifies as a taxable reit subsidiary due to federal income tax restrictions on a reit 2019s ability to derive revenue directly from the operation and management of a hotel . ground leases as of december 31 , 2017 , all or a portion of 26 of our hotels are subject to ground leases , generally with multiple renewal options , all of which are accounted for as operating leases . for lease agreements with scheduled rent increases , we recognize the lease expense ratably over the term of the lease . certain of these leases contain provisions for the payment of contingent rentals based on a percentage of sales in excess of stipulated amounts . other lease information we also have leases on facilities used in our former restaurant business , all of which we subsequently subleased . these leases and subleases contain one or more renewal options , generally for five- or ten-year periods . the restaurant leases are accounted for as operating leases . our contingent liability related to these leases is $ 9 million as of december 31 , 2017 . we , however , consider the likelihood of any material funding related to these leases to be remote . our leasing activity also includes those entered into by our hotels for various types of equipment , such as computer equipment , vehicles and telephone systems . equipment leases are accounted for either as operating or capital leases , depending upon the characteristics of the particular lease arrangement . equipment leases that are characterized as capital leases are classified as furniture and equipment and are depreciated over the life of the lease . the amortization expense applicable to capitalized leases is included in depreciation expense. .

Question: what was the percentage change in cash paid for income taxes , net of refunds received between 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 67%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on december 31 , 2011 in our stock or in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ended december 31 , 2016 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana inc. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , goodyear tire & rubber co. , johnson controls international plc , lear corp. , lkq corp. , meritor inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Financial table:
company index: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ); december 31 2011: $ 100.00; december 31 2012: $ 177.58; december 31 2013: $ 283.02; december 31 2014: $ 347.40; december 31 2015: $ 414.58; december 31 2016: $ 331.43
company index: s&p 500 ( 2 ); december 31 2011: 100.00; december 31 2012: 116.00; december 31 2013: 153.58; december 31 2014: 174.60; december 31 2015: 177.01; december 31 2016: 198.18
company index: automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ); december 31 2011: 100.00; december 31 2012: 127.04; december 31 2013: 188.67; december 31 2014: 203.06; december 31 2015: 198.34; december 31 2016: 202.30

Additional report context:
dividends the company has declared and paid cash dividends of $ 0.25 and $ 0.29 per ordinary share in each quarter of 2015 and 2016 , respectively . in addition , in january 2017 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.29 per ordinary share , payable on february 15 , 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 6 , 2017. .

Question: what was the percentage return for the 5 year period ending december 31 2016 of delphi automotive plc?
Answer: 231.43%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 20 , 2015 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 78.97 . holders there were 28 holders of record of our common stock as of february 20 , 2015 . dividend policy during 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.16 per share , $ 0.13 per share and $ 0.11 per share , respectively . on december 27 , 2012 , we paid a special cash dividend of $ 1.30 per share . in january 2015 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.20 per share payable on february 26 , 2015 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 12 , 2015 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , our financial results , capital requirements , contractual obligations , legal and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to our stockholders or by our subsidiaries to their respective parent entities , and such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans please see the section entitled 201cequity compensation plan information 201d in item 12. .

Financial table:
2014:: january 1 2014 to march 31 2014; high: $ 67.16; low: $ 57.99
2014:: april 1 2014 to june 30 2014; high: $ 59.65; low: $ 50.30
2014:: july 1 2014 to september 30 2014; high: $ 62.05; low: $ 47.50
2014:: october 1 2014 to december 31 2014; high: $ 73.25; low: $ 61.15
2014:: 2013:; high: high; low: low
2014:: january 1 2013 to march 31 2013; high: $ 41.85; low: $ 34.79
2014:: april 1 2013 to june 30 2013; high: $ 47.80; low: $ 37.09
2014:: july 1 2013 to september 30 2013; high: $ 61.47; low: $ 47.59
2014:: october 1 2013 to december 31 2013; high: $ 70.60; low: $ 61.34

Additional report context:
.

Question: between july 1 2014 to september 30 2014 what was the spread between the high and low price per share?
Answer: 14.55
Financial report context:
dividends for a summary of the cash dividends paid on citi 2019s outstanding common stock during 2009 and 2010 , see note 33 to the consolidated financial statements . for so long as the u.s . government holds any citigroup trust preferred securities acquired pursuant to the exchange offers consummated in 2009 , citigroup has agreed not to pay a quarterly common stock dividend exceeding $ 0.01 per quarter , subject to certain customary exceptions . further , any dividend on citi 2019s outstanding common stock would need to be made in compliance with citi 2019s obligations to any remaining outstanding citigroup preferred stock . performance graph comparison of five-year cumulative total return the following graph and table compare the cumulative total return on citigroup 2019s common stock with the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index over the five-year period extending through december 31 , 2010 . the graph and table assume that $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2005 in citigroup 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p financial index and that all dividends were reinvested . citigroup s&p 500 index s&p financial index comparison of five-year cumulative total return for the years ended 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 .

Financial table:
december 31,: 2006; citigroup: 119.55; s&p 500 index: 115.79; s&p financial index: 119.19
december 31,: 2007; citigroup: 66.10; s&p 500 index: 122.15; s&p financial index: 96.98
december 31,: 2008; citigroup: 15.88; s&p 500 index: 76.96; s&p financial index: 43.34
december 31,: 2009; citigroup: 7.85; s&p 500 index: 97.33; s&p financial index: 50.80
december 31,: 2010; citigroup: 11.22; s&p 500 index: 111.99; s&p financial index: 56.96

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return between cititgroup's common stock and the s&p 500 index for the five year period ending 2010?
Answer: -45.38