alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
2018 annual report 23 five-year stock performance graph the graph below illustrates the cumulative total shareholder return on snap-on common stock since december 31 , 2013 , of a $ 100 investment , assuming that dividends were reinvested quarterly . the graph compares snap-on 2019s performance to that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 industrials index ( 201cs&p 500 industrials 201d ) and standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . fiscal year ended ( 1 ) snap-on incorporated s&p 500 industrials s&p 500 .

Financial table:
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2013; snap-onincorporated: $ 100.00; s&p 500industrials: $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2014; snap-onincorporated: 126.77; s&p 500industrials: 109.83; s&p 500: 113.69
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2015; snap-onincorporated: 161.15; s&p 500industrials: 107.04; s&p 500: 115.26
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2016; snap-onincorporated: 163.63; s&p 500industrials: 127.23; s&p 500: 129.05
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2017; snap-onincorporated: 169.61; s&p 500industrials: 153.99; s&p 500: 157.22
fiscal year ended ( 1 ): december 31 2018; snap-onincorporated: 144.41; s&p 500industrials: 133.53; s&p 500: 150.33

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the company 2019s fiscal year ends on the saturday that is on or nearest to december 31 of each year ; for ease of calculation , the fiscal year end is assumed to be december 31. .

Question: what was the percent change in the snap-on performance from 2015 to 2016
Answer: 36.86
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following graph compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 index for the year ended december 31 , 2017 , the 2016 fiscal transition period , and the years ended may 31 , 2016 , 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 index and the standard & poor 2019s information technology index on may 31 , 2012 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . 5/12 5/165/155/145/13 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology 12/16 12/17 comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index * $ 100 invested on may 31 , 2012 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved . global payments 500 index information technology .

Financial table:
globalpayments: may 31 2012; s&p500 index: $ 100.00; s&pinformationtechnology index: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
globalpayments: may 31 2013; s&p500 index: 113.10; s&pinformationtechnology index: 127.28; column_4: 115.12
globalpayments: may 31 2014; s&p500 index: 161.90; s&pinformationtechnology index: 153.30; column_4: 142.63
globalpayments: may 31 2015; s&p500 index: 246.72; s&pinformationtechnology index: 171.40; column_4: 169.46
globalpayments: may 31 2016; s&p500 index: 367.50; s&pinformationtechnology index: 174.34; column_4: 174.75
globalpayments: december 31 2016; s&p500 index: 328.42; s&pinformationtechnology index: 188.47; column_4: 194.08
globalpayments: december 31 2017; s&p500 index: 474.52; s&pinformationtechnology index: 229.61; column_4: 269.45

Additional report context:
30 2013 global payments inc . | 2017 form 10-k annual report .

Question: what is the total return if 1000000 is invested in global payments in may 31 , 2012 and liquidated in may 31 , 2015?
Answer: 1467200
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2017 annual report 39 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced equity benchmark in the united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) , consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2012: $ 100.00; 2013: $ 136.71; 2014: $ 150.22; 2015: $ 162.79; 2016: $ 219.06; 2017: $ 277.62
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 137.76; 2014: 150.66; 2015: 151.39; 2016: 194.55; 2017: 230.72
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 135.59; 2014: 156.17; 2015: 153.72; 2016: 188.69; 2017: 230.47
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2012: 100.00; 2013: 132.37; 2014: 150.48; 2015: 152.55; 2016: 170.78; 2017: 208.05

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) 201720162015201420132012 .

Question: did jpmorgan chase outperform the s&p 500 index?\\n
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph shows a five-year comparison of the cumulative total return on our common stock , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index from april 24 , 2009 through april 25 , 2014 . the past performance of our common stock is not indicative of the future performance of our common stock . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among netapp , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 information technology index .

Financial table:
4/09: netapp inc .; 4/10: $ 100.00; 4/11: $ 189.45; 4/12: $ 284.75; 4/13: $ 212.19; 4/14: $ 190.66; column_7: $ 197.58
4/09: nasdaq composite; 4/10: 100.00; 4/11: 144.63; 4/12: 170.44; 4/13: 182.57; 4/14: 202.25; column_7: 253.22
4/09: s&p 500; 4/10: 100.00; 4/11: 138.84; 4/12: 162.75; 4/13: 170.49; 4/14: 199.29; column_7: 240.02
4/09: s&p 500 information technology; 4/10: 100.00; 4/11: 143.49; 4/12: 162.37; 4/13: 186.06; 4/14: 189.18; column_7: 236.12

Additional report context:
we believe that a number of factors may cause the market price of our common stock to fluctuate significantly . see 201citem 1a . risk factors . 201d sale of unregistered securities .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total return for the five year period ending 4/14 between netapp inc . and the s&p 500 information technology index?
Answer: -38.54
Financial report context:
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Financial table:
september 2010: apple inc .; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 138; september 2013: $ 229; september 2014: $ 170; september 2015: $ 254; column_7: $ 294
september 2010: s&p 500 index; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 101; september 2013: $ 132; september 2014: $ 157; september 2015: $ 188; column_7: $ 187
september 2010: s&p information technology index; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 104; september 2013: $ 137; september 2014: $ 147; september 2015: $ 190; column_7: $ 194
september 2010: dow jones u.s . technology supersector index; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 103; september 2013: $ 134; september 2014: $ 141; september 2015: $ 183; column_7: $ 183

Additional report context:
apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for the four years ended 2014?
Answer: 154%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph comcast the graph below compares the yearly percentage change in the cumulative total shareholder return on comcast 2019s class a common stock during the five years ended december 31 , 2015 with the cumulative total returns on the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and with a select peer group consisting of us and other companies engaged in the cable , communications and media industries . this peer group consists of us , as well as cablevision systems corporation ( class a ) , dish network corporation ( class a ) , directv inc . ( included through july 24 , 2015 , the date of acquisition by at&t corp. ) and time warner cable inc . ( the 201ccable subgroup 201d ) , and time warner inc. , walt disney company , viacom inc . ( class b ) , twenty-first century fox , inc . ( class a ) , and cbs corporation ( class b ) ( the 201cmedia subgroup 201d ) . the peer group was constructed as a composite peer group in which the cable subgroup is weighted 63% ( 63 % ) and the media subgroup is weighted 37% ( 37 % ) based on the respective revenue of our cable communications and nbcuniversal segments . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2010 in our class a common stock and in each of the following indices and assumes the reinvestment of dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return 12/1412/1312/1212/10 12/15 comcast class a s&p 500 peer group index .

Financial table:
2011: comcast class a; 2012: $ 110; 2013: $ 177; 2014: $ 250; 2015: $ 282; column_6: $ 279
2011: s&p 500 stock index; 2012: $ 102; 2013: $ 118; 2014: $ 156; 2015: $ 177; column_6: $ 180
2011: peer group index; 2012: $ 110; 2013: $ 157; 2014: $ 231; 2015: $ 267; column_6: $ 265

Additional report context:
nbcuniversal nbcuniversal is a wholly owned subsidiary of nbcuniversal holdings and there is no market for its equity securities . 39 comcast 2015 annual report on form 10-k .

Question: what was the differencet in percentage 5 year cumulative total return for comcast class a stock and the s&p 500 stock index for the year ended 2015?
Answer: 99%
Financial report context:
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

Financial table:
12/31/2007: lkq corporation; 12/31/2008: $ 100; 12/31/2009: $ 55; 12/31/2010: $ 93; 12/31/2011: $ 108; 12/31/2012: $ 143; column_7: $ 201
12/31/2007: nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index; 12/31/2008: $ 100; 12/31/2009: $ 59; 12/31/2010: $ 86; 12/31/2011: $ 100; 12/31/2012: $ 98; column_7: $ 114
12/31/2007: peer group; 12/31/2008: $ 100; 12/31/2009: $ 83; 12/31/2010: $ 100; 12/31/2011: $ 139; 12/31/2012: $ 187; column_7: $ 210

Additional report context:
this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2012 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage of cumulative return for lkq corporation and the peer group for the five years ended 12/31/2012?
Answer: 110%
Financial report context:
the contractual maturities of held-to-maturity securities as of january 30 , 2009 were in excess of three years and were $ 31.4 million at cost and $ 28.9 million at fair value , respectively . for the successor year ended january 30 , 2009 and period ended february 1 , 2008 , and the predecessor period ended july 6 , 2007 and year ended february 2 , 2007 , gross realized gains and losses on the sales of available-for-sale securities were not material . the cost of securities sold is based upon the specific identification method . merchandise inventories inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market with cost determined using the retail last-in , first-out ( 201clifo 201d ) method . under the company 2019s retail inventory method ( 201crim 201d ) , the calculation of gross profit and the resulting valuation of inventories at cost are computed by applying a calculated cost-to-retail inventory ratio to the retail value of sales at a department level . costs directly associated with warehousing and distribution are capitalized into inventory . the excess of current cost over lifo cost was approximately $ 50.0 million at january 30 , 2009 and $ 6.1 million at february 1 , 2008 . current cost is determined using the retail first-in , first-out method . the company 2019s lifo reserves were adjusted to zero at july 6 , 2007 as a result of the merger . the successor recorded lifo provisions of $ 43.9 million and $ 6.1 million during 2008 and 2007 , respectively . the predecessor recorded a lifo credit of $ 1.5 million in 2006 . in 2008 , the increased commodity cost pressures mainly related to food and pet products which have been driven by fruit and vegetable prices and rising freight costs . increases in petroleum , resin , metals , pulp and other raw material commodity driven costs also resulted in multiple product cost increases . the company intends to address these commodity cost increases through negotiations with its vendors and by increasing retail prices as necessary . on a quarterly basis , the company estimates the annual impact of commodity cost fluctuations based upon the best available information at that point in time . store pre-opening costs pre-opening costs related to new store openings and the construction periods are expensed as incurred . property and equipment property and equipment are recorded at cost . the company provides for depreciation and amortization on a straight-line basis over the following estimated useful lives: .

Financial table:
land improvements: buildings; 20: 39-40
land improvements: furniture fixtures and equipment; 20: 3-10

Additional report context:
improvements of leased properties are amortized over the shorter of the life of the applicable lease term or the estimated useful life of the asset. .

Question: what was the total lifo provisions recorded by the successor from 2007 to 2008 in millions
Answer: 50
Financial report context:
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock issued in treasury shares outstanding ( stated in millions ) .

Financial table:
issued: balance january 1 2008; in treasury: 1334; shares outstanding: -138 ( 138 ); column_4: 1196
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 5; column_4: 5
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 2; column_4: 2
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -21 ( 21 ); column_4: -21 ( 21 )
issued: issued on conversions of debentures; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 12; column_4: 12
issued: balance december 31 2008; in treasury: 1334; shares outstanding: -140 ( 140 ); column_4: 1194
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 4; column_4: 4
issued: vesting of restricted stock; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 1; column_4: 1
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 4; column_4: 4
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -8 ( 8 ); column_4: -8 ( 8 )
issued: balance december 31 2009; in treasury: 1334; shares outstanding: -139 ( 139 ); column_4: 1195
issued: acquisition of smith international inc .; in treasury: 100; shares outstanding: 76; column_4: 176
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 6; column_4: 6
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 3; column_4: 3
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -27 ( 27 ); column_4: -27 ( 27 )
issued: issued on conversions of debentures; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 8; column_4: 8
issued: balance december 31 2010; in treasury: 1434; shares outstanding: -73 ( 73 ); column_4: 1361

Additional report context:
see the notes to consolidated financial statements part ii , item 8 .

Question: what was the average beginning and ending balance of shares in millions outstanding during 2009?
Answer: 1194.5
Financial report context:
provision for income taxes increased $ 1791 million in 2012 from 2011 primarily due to the increase in pretax income from continuing operations , including the impact of the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 . the following is an analysis of the effective income tax rates for 2012 and 2011: .

Financial table:
2012: statutory rate applied to income from continuing operations before income taxes; 2011: 35% ( 35 % ); column_3: 35% ( 35 % )
2012: effects of foreign operations including foreign tax credits; 2011: 18; column_3: 6
2012: change in permanent reinvestment assertion; 2011: 2014; column_3: 5
2012: adjustments to valuation allowances; 2011: 21; column_3: 14
2012: tax law changes; 2011: 2014; column_3: 1
2012: effective income tax rate on continuing operations; 2011: 74% ( 74 % ); column_3: 61% ( 61 % )

Additional report context:
the effective income tax rate is influenced by a variety of factors including the geographic sources of income and the relative magnitude of these sources of income . the provision for income taxes is allocated on a discrete , stand-alone basis to pretax segment income and to individual items not allocated to segments . the difference between the total provision and the sum of the amounts allocated to segments appears in the "corporate and other unallocated items" shown in the reconciliation of segment income to net income below . effects of foreign operations 2013 the effects of foreign operations on our effective tax rate increased in 2012 as compared to 2011 , primarily due to the resumption of sales in libya in the first quarter of 2012 , where the statutory rate is in excess of 90 percent . change in permanent reinvestment assertion 2013 in the second quarter of 2011 , we recorded $ 716 million of deferred u.s . tax on undistributed earnings of $ 2046 million that we previously intended to permanently reinvest in foreign operations . offsetting this tax expense were associated foreign tax credits of $ 488 million . in addition , we reduced our valuation allowance related to foreign tax credits by $ 228 million due to recognizing deferred u.s . tax on previously undistributed earnings . adjustments to valuation allowances 2013 in 2012 and 2011 , we increased the valuation allowance against foreign tax credits because it is more likely than not that we will be unable to realize all u.s . benefits on foreign taxes accrued in those years . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data - note 10 to the consolidated financial statements for further information about income taxes . discontinued operations is presented net of tax , and reflects our downstream business that was spun off june 30 , 2011 and our angola business which we agreed to sell in 2013 . see item 8 . financial statements and supplementary data 2013 notes 3 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information. .

Question: what was the average effective income tax rate on continuing operations?
Answer: 67.5
Financial report context:
table of contents index to financial statements item 3 . legal proceedings . item 4 . mine safety disclosures . not applicable . part ii price range our common stock trades on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cmktx 201d . the range of closing price information for our common stock , as reported by nasdaq , was as follows : on february 16 , 2012 , the last reported closing price of our common stock on the nasdaq global select market was $ 32.65 . holders there were 41 holders of record of our common stock as of february 16 , 2012 . dividend policy we initiated a regular quarterly dividend in the fourth quarter of 2009 . during 2010 and 2011 , we paid quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.07 per share and $ 0.09 per share , respectively . in january 2012 , our board of directors approved a quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.11 per share payable on march 1 , 2012 to stockholders of record as of the close of business on february 16 , 2012 . any future declaration and payment of dividends will be at the sole discretion of the company 2019s board of directors . the board of directors may take into account such matters as general business conditions , the company 2019s financial results , capital requirements , contractual , legal , and regulatory restrictions on the payment of dividends to the company 2019s stockholders or by the company 2019s subsidiaries to the parent and any such other factors as the board of directors may deem relevant . recent sales of unregistered securities item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities. .

Financial table:
2011:: january 1 2011 to march 31 2011; high: $ 24.19; low: $ 19.78
2011:: april 1 2011 to june 30 2011; high: $ 25.22; low: $ 21.00
2011:: july 1 2011 to september 30 2011; high: $ 30.75; low: $ 23.41
2011:: october 1 2011 to december 31 2011; high: $ 31.16; low: $ 24.57
2011:: 2010:; high: high; low: low
2011:: january 1 2010 to march 31 2010; high: $ 16.20; low: $ 13.25
2011:: april 1 2010 to june 30 2010; high: $ 17.40; low: $ 13.45
2011:: july 1 2010 to september 30 2010; high: $ 17.30; low: $ 12.39
2011:: october 1 2010 to december 31 2010; high: $ 20.93; low: $ 16.93

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the total cash dividend paid to holders of common stock as of february 12 , 2012?
Answer: 4.51