alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 26 , 2008 through october 27 , 2013 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 26 , 2008 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index * assumes $ 100 invested on 10/26/08 in stock or 10/31/08 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . 201cs&p 201d is a registered trademark of standard & poor 2019s financial services llc , a subsidiary of the mcgraw-hill companies , inc. .

Financial table:
10/26/2008: applied materials; 10/25/2009: 100.00; 10/31/2010: 116.07; 10/30/2011: 113.08; 10/28/2012: 118.21; 10/27/2013: 102.77; column_7: 175.76
10/26/2008: s&p 500 index; 10/25/2009: 100.00; 10/31/2010: 109.80; 10/30/2011: 127.94; 10/28/2012: 138.29; 10/27/2013: 159.32; column_7: 202.61
10/26/2008: rdg semiconductor composite index; 10/25/2009: 100.00; 10/31/2010: 124.98; 10/30/2011: 153.98; 10/28/2012: 166.89; 10/27/2013: 149.81; column_7: 200.47

Additional report context:
dividends during fiscal 2013 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.10 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.09 per share . during fiscal 2012 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.09 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.08 per share . during fiscal 2011 , applied 2019s board of directors declared three quarterly cash dividends of $ 0.08 per share each and one quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.07 . dividends declared during fiscal 2013 , 2012 and 2011 totaled $ 469 million , $ 438 million and $ 408 million , respectively . applied currently anticipates that it will continue to pay cash dividends on a quarterly basis in the future , although the declaration and amount of any future cash dividends are at the discretion of the board of directors and will depend on applied 2019s financial condition , results of operations , capital requirements , business conditions and other factors , as well as a determination that cash dividends are in the best interests of applied 2019s stockholders. .

Question: what is the total return if 100000 are invested in applied materials in 2008 and sold in 2011?
Answer: 18210
Financial report context:
stockholder return performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative 5-year total stockholder return on our common stock relative to the cumulative total return of the nasdaq composite index and the s&p 400 information technology index . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock on january 2 , 2010 and in each index on december 31 , 2009 ( including reinvestment of dividends ) was $ 100 and tracks it each year thereafter on the last day of cadence 2019s fiscal year through january 3 , 2015 and , for each index , on the last day of the calendar comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cadence design systems , inc. , the nasdaq composite index , and s&p 400 information technology cadence design systems , inc . nasdaq composite s&p 400 information technology 12/28/13 1/3/151/1/11 12/31/11 12/29/121/2/10 *$ 100 invested on 1/2/10 in stock or 12/31/09 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2014 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
1/2/2010: cadence design systems inc .; 1/1/2011: 100.00; 12/31/2011: 137.90; 12/29/2012: 173.62; 12/28/2013: 224.37; 1/3/2015: 232.55; column_7: 314.36
1/2/2010: nasdaq composite; 1/1/2011: 100.00; 12/31/2011: 117.61; 12/29/2012: 118.70; 12/28/2013: 139.00; 1/3/2015: 196.83; column_7: 223.74
1/2/2010: s&p 400 information technology; 1/1/2011: 100.00; 12/31/2011: 128.72; 12/29/2012: 115.22; 12/28/2013: 135.29; 1/3/2015: 173.25; column_7: 187.84

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative 5-year total stockholder return for cadence design systems inc . and the nasdaq copmosite for the period ended 1/3/2015?
Answer: 90.62%
Financial report context:
republic services , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the plan to reflect the allied acquisition . the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , provides for the grant of non- qualified stock options , incentive stock options , shares of restricted stock , shares of phantom stock , stock bonuses , restricted stock units , stock appreciation rights , performance awards , dividend equivalents , cash awards , or other stock-based awards . awards granted under the 2006 plan prior to december 5 , 2008 became fully vested and nonforfeitable upon the closing of the acquisition . awards may be granted under the 2006 plan , as amended and restated , after december 5 , 2008 only to employees and consultants of allied and its subsidiaries who were not employed by republic prior to such date . as of december 31 , 2013 , there were approximately 15.6 million shares of common stock reserved for future grants under the 2006 plan . stock options we use a lattice binomial option-pricing model to value our stock option grants . we recognize compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award , or to the employee 2019s retirement eligible date , if earlier . expected volatility is based on the weighted average of the most recent one year volatility and a historical rolling average volatility of our stock over the expected life of the option . the risk-free interest rate is based on federal reserve rates in effect for bonds with maturity dates equal to the expected term of the option . we use historical data to estimate future option exercises , forfeitures ( at 3.0% ( 3.0 % ) for each of the periods presented ) and expected life of the options . when appropriate , separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes . the weighted-average estimated fair values of stock options granted during the years ended december 31 , 2013 , 2012 and 2011 were $ 5.27 , $ 4.77 and $ 5.35 per option , respectively , which were calculated using the following weighted-average assumptions: .

Financial table:
2013: expected volatility; 2012: 28.9% ( 28.9 % ); 2011: 27.8% ( 27.8 % ); column_4: 27.3% ( 27.3 % )
2013: risk-free interest rate; 2012: 0.7% ( 0.7 % ); 2011: 0.8% ( 0.8 % ); column_4: 1.7% ( 1.7 % )
2013: dividend yield; 2012: 3.2% ( 3.2 % ); 2011: 3.2% ( 3.2 % ); column_4: 2.7% ( 2.7 % )
2013: expected life ( in years ); 2012: 4.5; 2011: 4.5; column_4: 4.4
2013: contractual life ( in years ); 2012: 7.0; 2011: 7.0; column_4: 7.0

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentage change in the expected volatility from 2012 to 2013
Answer: 3.95%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2010 annual report 281 pledged assets at december 31 , 2010 , assets were pledged to collateralize repur- chase agreements , other securities financing agreements , derivative transactions and for other purposes , including to secure borrowings and public deposits . certain of these pledged assets may be sold or repledged by the secured parties and are identified as financial instruments owned ( pledged to various parties ) on the consoli- dated balance sheets . in addition , at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had pledged $ 288.7 billion and $ 344.6 billion , respectively , of financial instruments it owns that may not be sold or repledged by the secured parties . the significant components of the firm 2019s pledged assets were as follows. .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in billions ): securities; 2010: $ 112.1; 2009: $ 155.3
december 31 ( in billions ): loans; 2010: 214.8; 2009: 285.5
december 31 ( in billions ): trading assets and other; 2010: 123.2; 2009: 84.6
december 31 ( in billions ): totalassetspledged ( a ); 2010: $ 450.1; 2009: $ 525.4

Additional report context:
total assets pledged ( a ) $ 450.1 $ 525.4 ( a ) total assets pledged do not include assets of consolidated vies ; these assets are used to settle the liabilities of those entities . see note 16 on pages 244 2013 259 of this annual report for additional information on assets and liabilities of consolidated vies . collateral at december 31 , 2010 and 2009 , the firm had accepted assets as collateral that it could sell or repledge , deliver or otherwise use with a fair value of approximately $ 655.0 billion and $ 635.6 billion , respectively . this collateral was generally obtained under resale agreements , securities borrowing agreements , cus- tomer margin loans and derivative agreements . of the collateral received , approximately $ 521.3 billion and $ 472.7 billion were sold or repledged , generally as collateral under repurchase agreements , securities lending agreements or to cover short sales and to collat- eralize deposits and derivative agreements . the reporting of collat- eral sold or repledged was revised in 2010 to include certain securities used to cover short sales and to collateralize deposits and derivative agreements . prior period amounts have been revised to conform to the current presentation . this revision had no impact on the firm 2019s consolidated balance sheets or its results of operations . contingencies in 2008 , the firm resolved with the irs issues related to compliance with reporting and withholding requirements for certain accounts transferred to the bank of new york mellon corporation ( 201cbnym 201d ) in connection with the firm 2019s sale to bnym of its corporate trust business . the resolution of these issues did not have a material effect on the firm. .

Question: as of december 31 , 2009 , what percentage of the collateral that it was able to sell , repledge , deliver , or otherwise use was actually used for these purposes?
Answer: 74.4%
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses . 2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 973.7
( in millions ): price applied to unbilled sales; column_2: -31.9 ( 31.9 )
( in millions ): deferred fuel cost revisions; column_2: -29.4 ( 29.4 )
( in millions ): rate refund provisions; column_2: -12.2 ( 12.2 )
( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 17.0
( in millions ): summer capacity charges; column_2: 11.8
( in millions ): other; column_2: 2.3
( in millions ): 2004 net revenue; column_2: $ 931.3

Additional report context:
the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds . the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors . the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what is the decrease in net income as a percentage of the the decrease in net revenue from 2003 to 2004?
Answer: 44.1%
Financial report context:
intangible asset amortization expense amounted to $ 12 million , $ 4 million and $ 4 million for the years ended december 31 , 2018 , 2017 and 2016 , respectively . estimated amortization expense for the next five years subsequent to december 31 , 2018 is as follows: .

Financial table:
amount: 2019; column_2: $ 15
amount: 2020; column_2: 13
amount: 2021; column_2: 11
amount: 2022; column_2: 10
amount: 2023; column_2: 7

Additional report context:
note 9 : shareholders 2019 equity common stock under the dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan ( the 201cdrip 201d ) , shareholders may reinvest cash dividends and purchase additional company common stock , up to certain limits , through the plan administrator without commission fees . shares purchased by participants through the drip may be newly issued shares , treasury shares , or at the company 2019s election , shares purchased by the plan administrator in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions . purchases generally will be made and credited to drip accounts once each week . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were approximately 4.2 million shares available for future issuance under the drip . anti-dilutive stock repurchase program in february 2015 , the company 2019s board of directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program , which allowed the company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time . the company repurchased 0.6 million shares and 0.7 million shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $ 45 million and $ 54 million under this program for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2018 , there were 5.5 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program. .

Question: the company repurchased how many million shares of common stock in the open market for the years ended december 31 , 2018 and 2017?
Answer: 1.3
Financial report context:
future minimum lease payments for all non-cancelable operating leases at may 31 , 2013 were as follows : fiscal years ending may 31: .

Financial table:
2014: 2015; $ 11057: 8985
2014: 2016; $ 11057: 7378
2014: 2017; $ 11057: 6700
2014: 2018; $ 11057: 6164
2014: thereafter; $ 11057: 16812
2014: total future minimum lease payments; $ 11057: $ 57096

Additional report context:
we are party to a number of claims and lawsuits incidental to our business . in our opinion , the liabilities , if any , which may ultimately result from the outcome of such matters , individually or in the aggregate , are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position , liquidity or results of operations . operating taxes we define operating taxes as taxes that are unrelated to income taxes , such as sales , property , value-add and other business taxes . during the course of operations , we must interpret the meaning of various operating tax matters in the united states and in the foreign jurisdictions in which we do business . taxing authorities in those various jurisdictions may arrive at different interpretations of applicable tax laws and regulations as they relate to such operating tax matters , which could result in the payment of additional taxes in those jurisdictions . as of may 31 , 2013 and 2012 , we did not have liabilities for contingencies related to operating tax items based on management 2019s best estimate given our history with similar matters and interpretations of current laws and regulations . bin/ica agreements we have entered into sponsorship or depository and processing agreements with certain banks . these agreements allow us to use the banks 2019 identification numbers , referred to as bank identification number ( 201cbin 201d ) for visa transactions and interbank card association ( 201cica 201d ) number for mastercard transactions , to clear credit card transactions through visa and mastercard . certain of such agreements contain financial covenants , and we were in compliance with all such covenants as of may 31 , 2013 . our canadian visa sponsorship , which was originally obtained through a canadian financial institution , expired in march 2011 . we have filed an application with the office of the superintendent of financial institutions canada ( 201cosfi 201d ) for the formation of a wholly owned loan company in canada which would serve as our financial institution sponsor . on december 12 , 2012 , the loan company received a restricted order to commence and carry on business from osfi which will enable the loan company to become a direct visa member at such time that global payments concludes the appropriate bin transfer process with visa . in march 2011 , we obtained temporary direct participation in the visa canada system , while the loan company application was pending . we anticipate that the bin transfer process with visa will be completed by september 30 , 2013. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the expected minimum payments from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: -18.7%
Financial report context:
the following shares were excluded from the calculation of average shares outstanding 2013 diluted as their effect was anti- dilutive ( shares in millions ) . .

Financial table:
2018: mandatory convertible preferred stock; 2017: n/a; 2016: 39; column_4: 39
2018: convertible notes; 2017: 2014; 2016: 14; column_4: 14
2018: stock options ( 1 ); 2017: 9; 2016: 11; column_4: 13
2018: stock awards; 2017: 2014; 2016: 7; column_4: 8

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the average exercise price of options per share was $ 26.79 , $ 33.32 , and $ 26.93 for 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . in 2017 , had arconic generated sufficient net income , 30 million , 14 million , 5 million , and 1 million potential shares of common stock related to the mandatory convertible preferred stock , convertible notes , stock awards , and stock options , respectively , would have been included in diluted average shares outstanding . the mandatory convertible preferred stock converted on october 2 , 2017 ( see note i ) . in 2016 , had arconic generated sufficient net income , 28 million , 10 million , 4 million , and 1 million potential shares of common stock related to the mandatory convertible preferred stock , convertible notes , stock awards , and stock options , respectively , would have been included in diluted average shares outstanding. .

Question: considering the average exercise price of options , what is the estimated total value of stock options in 2018 , in millions of dollars?
Answer: 241.11
Financial report context:
.

Financial table:
currency: real; 2012: $ 40.4; 2011: $ 42.4; 2010: $ 32.5
currency: euro; 2012: 27.1; 2011: 26.4; 2010: 18.6
currency: pound sterling; 2012: 18.5; 2011: 17.6; 2010: 9.0
currency: indian rupee; 2012: 4.3; 2011: 3.6; 2010: 2.6
currency: total impact; 2012: $ 90.3; 2011: $ 90.0; 2010: $ 62.7

Additional report context:
the impact on earnings of the foregoing assumed 10% ( 10 % ) change in each of the periods presented would not have been significant . revenue included $ 100.8 million and operating income included $ 9.0 million of unfavorable foreign currency impact during 2012 resulting from a stronger u.s . dollar during 2012 compared to 2011 . our foreign exchange risk management policy permits the use of derivative instruments , such as forward contracts and options , to reduce volatility in our results of operations and/or cash flows resulting from foreign exchange rate fluctuations . our international operations' revenues and expenses are generally denominated in local currency , which limits the economic exposure to foreign exchange risk in those jurisdictions . we do not enter into foreign currency derivative instruments for trading purposes . we have entered into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge foreign currency exposure to intercompany loans . as of december 31 , 2012 , the notional amount of these derivatives was approximately $ 115.6 million and the fair value was nominal . these derivatives are intended to hedge the foreign exchange risks related to intercompany loans , but have not been designated as hedges for accounting purposes. .

Question: what was the percentage change in the impact of the euro on earnings from 2011 to 2012?
Answer: 3%