alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
n o t e s t o c o n s o l i d a t e d f i n a n c i a l s t a t e m e n t s ( continued ) ace limited and subsidiaries the following table shows changes in the company 2019s stock options for the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and number of options weighted average exercise price .

Financial table:
number of options: options outstanding december 31 2005; weightedaverageexercise price: 12643761; column_3: $ 36.53
number of options: granted; weightedaverageexercise price: 1505215; column_3: $ 56.29
number of options: exercised; weightedaverageexercise price: -1982560 ( 1982560 ); column_3: $ 33.69
number of options: forfeited; weightedaverageexercise price: -413895 ( 413895 ); column_3: $ 39.71
number of options: options outstanding december 31 2006; weightedaverageexercise price: 11752521; column_3: $ 39.43
number of options: granted; weightedaverageexercise price: 1549091; column_3: $ 56.17
number of options: exercised; weightedaverageexercise price: -1830004 ( 1830004 ); column_3: $ 35.73
number of options: forfeited; weightedaverageexercise price: -200793 ( 200793 ); column_3: $ 51.66
number of options: options outstanding december 31 2007; weightedaverageexercise price: 11270815; column_3: $ 42.12
number of options: granted; weightedaverageexercise price: 1612507; column_3: $ 60.17
number of options: exercised; weightedaverageexercise price: -2650733 ( 2650733 ); column_3: $ 36.25
number of options: forfeited; weightedaverageexercise price: -309026 ( 309026 ); column_3: $ 54.31
number of options: options outstanding december 31 2008; weightedaverageexercise price: 9923563; column_3: $ 46.24

Additional report context:
the weighted-average remaining contractual term was 5.8 years for the stock options outstanding and 4.6 years for the stock options exercisable at december 31 , 2008 . the total intrinsic value was approximately $ 66 million for stock options out- standing and $ 81 million for stock options exercisable at december 31 , 2008 . the weighted-average fair value for the stock options granted for the year ended december 31 , 2008 was $ 17.60 . the total intrinsic value for stock options exercised dur- ing the years ended december 31 , 2008 , 2007 , and 2006 , was approximately $ 54 million , $ 44 million , and $ 43 million , respectively . the amount of cash received during the year ended december 31 , 2008 , from the exercise of stock options was $ 97 million . restricted stock the company 2019s 2004 ltip also provides for grants of restricted stock . the company generally grants restricted stock with a 4-year vesting period , based on a graded vesting schedule . the restricted stock is granted at market close price on the date of grant . included in the company 2019s share-based compensation expense in the year ended december 31 , 2008 , is a portion of the cost related to the unvested restricted stock granted in the years 2004 to 2008. .

Question: what is the growth rate of the weighted average exercise price of options from december 31 , 2005 to december 31 , 2008?
Answer: 26.6%
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income increased $ 16.2 million due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , a lower effective income tax rate for 2004 compared to 2003 , and lower interest charges . the increase was partially offset by lower net revenue . 2003 compared to 2002 net income decreased $ 9.6 million due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002 . the decrease was substantially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher other income , and lower interest charges . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy arkansas' measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 998.7
( in millions ): deferred fuel cost revisions; column_2: -16.9 ( 16.9 )
( in millions ): other; column_2: -3.4 ( 3.4 )
( in millions ): 2004 net revenue; column_2: $ 978.4

Additional report context:
deferred fuel cost revisions includes the difference between the estimated deferred fuel expense and the actual calculation of recoverable fuel expense , which occurs on an annual basis . deferred fuel cost revisions decreased net revenue due to a revised estimate of fuel costs filed for recovery at entergy arkansas in the march 2004 energy cost recovery rider , which reduced net revenue by $ 11.5 million . the remainder of the variance is due to the 2002 energy cost recovery true-up , made in the first quarter of 2003 , which increased net revenue in 2003 . gross operating revenues , fuel and purchased power expenses , and other regulatory credits gross operating revenues increased primarily due to : 2022 an increase of $ 20.7 million in fuel cost recovery revenues due to an increase in the energy cost recovery rider effective april 2004 ( fuel cost recovery revenues are discussed in note 2 to the domestic utility companies and system energy financial statements ) ; 2022 an increase of $ 15.5 million in grand gulf revenues due to an increase in the grand gulf rider effective january 2004 ; 2022 an increase of $ 13.9 million in gross wholesale revenue primarily due to increased sales to affiliated systems ; 2022 an increase of $ 9.5 million due to volume/weather primarily resulting from increased usage during the unbilled sales period , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in 2004. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy arkansas inc.?
Answer: -2.0%
Financial report context:
entergy arkansas , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2008 compared to 2007 net income decreased $ 92.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher net revenue . the higher other operation and maintenance expenses resulted primarily from the write-off of approximately $ 70.8 million of costs as a result of the december 2008 arkansas court of appeals decision in entergy arkansas' base rate case . the base rate case is discussed in more detail in note 2 to the financial statements . 2007 compared to 2006 net income decreased $ 34.0 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and a higher effective income tax rate . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2008 compared to 2007 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2008 to 2007 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2007 net revenue; column_2: $ 1110.6
amount ( in millions ): rider revenue; column_2: 13.6
amount ( in millions ): purchased power capacity; column_2: 4.8
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -14.6 ( 14.6 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 3.5
amount ( in millions ): 2008 net revenue; column_2: $ 1117.9

Additional report context:
the rider revenue variance is primarily due to an energy efficiency rider which became effective in november 2007 . the establishment of the rider results in an increase in rider revenue and a corresponding increase in other operation and maintenance expense with no effect on net income . also contributing to the variance was an increase in franchise tax rider revenue as a result of higher retail revenues . the corresponding increase is in taxes other than income taxes , resulting in no effect on net income . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to lower reserve equalization expenses . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales during the billed and unbilled sales periods compared to 2007 and a 2.9% ( 2.9 % ) volume decrease in industrial sales , primarily in the wood industry and the small customer class . billed electricity usage decreased 333 gwh in all sectors . see "critical accounting estimates" below and note 1 to the financial statements for further discussion of the accounting for unbilled revenues. .

Question: what is the net change in net revenue during 2008 for entergy arkansas?
Answer: 7.3
Financial report context:
the company granted 1020 performance shares . the vesting of these shares is contingent on meeting stated goals over a performance period . beginning with restricted stock grants in september 2010 , dividends are accrued on restricted class a common stock and restricted stock units and are paid once the restricted stock vests . the following table summarizes restricted stock and performance shares activity for 2010 : number of shares weighted average grant date fair value .

Financial table:
number of shares: outstanding at december 31 2009; weighted average grant date fair value: 116677; column_3: $ 280
number of shares: granted; weighted average grant date fair value: 134245; column_3: 275
number of shares: vested; weighted average grant date fair value: -34630 ( 34630 ); column_3: 257
number of shares: cancelled; weighted average grant date fair value: -19830 ( 19830 ); column_3: 260
number of shares: outstanding at december 31 2010; weighted average grant date fair value: 196462; column_3: 283

Additional report context:
the total fair value of restricted stock that vested during the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , was $ 10.3 million , $ 6.2 million and $ 2.5 million , respectively . eligible employees may acquire shares of cme group 2019s class a common stock using after-tax payroll deductions made during consecutive offering periods of approximately six months in duration . shares are purchased at the end of each offering period at a price of 90% ( 90 % ) of the closing price of the class a common stock as reported on the nasdaq . compensation expense is recognized on the dates of purchase for the discount from the closing price . in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , a total of 4371 , 4402 and 5600 shares , respectively , of class a common stock were issued to participating employees . these shares are subject to a six-month holding period . annual expense of $ 0.1 million for the purchase discount was recognized in 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . non-executive directors receive an annual award of class a common stock with a value equal to $ 75000 . non-executive directors may also elect to receive some or all of the cash portion of their annual stipend , up to $ 25000 , in shares of stock based on the closing price at the date of distribution . as a result , 7470 , 11674 and 5509 shares of class a common stock were issued to non-executive directors during 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively . these shares are not subject to any vesting restrictions . expense of $ 2.4 million , $ 2.5 million and $ 2.4 million related to these stock-based payments was recognized for the years ended december 31 , 2010 , 2009 and 2008 , respectively. .

Question: for 2010 , given the class a common stock issued to non-executive directors and the recognized expense , what is the approximate deemed fair value per share at date of issuance?
Answer: 321
Financial report context:
humana inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) the total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during 2007 was $ 133.9 million , compared with $ 133.7 million during 2006 and $ 57.8 million during 2005 . cash received from stock option exercises for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 totaled $ 62.7 million , $ 49.2 million , and $ 36.4 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested options not yet recognized was $ 23.6 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.6 years . restricted stock awards restricted stock awards are granted with a fair value equal to the market price of our common stock on the date of grant . compensation expense is recorded straight-line over the vesting period , generally three years from the date of grant . the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards was $ 63.59 , $ 54.36 , and $ 32.81 for the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 , respectively . activity for our restricted stock awards was as follows for the year ended december 31 , 2007 : shares weighted average grant-date fair value .

Financial table:
shares: nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2006; weighted average grant-date fair value: 1107455; column_3: $ 45.86
shares: granted; weighted average grant-date fair value: 852353; column_3: 63.59
shares: vested; weighted average grant-date fair value: -51206 ( 51206 ); column_3: 56.93
shares: forfeited; weighted average grant-date fair value: -63624 ( 63624 ); column_3: 49.65
shares: nonvested restricted stock at december 31 2007; weighted average grant-date fair value: 1844978; column_3: $ 53.61

Additional report context:
the fair value of shares vested during the years ended december 31 , 2007 , 2006 , and 2005 was $ 3.4 million , $ 2.3 million , and $ 0.6 million , respectively . total compensation expense related to nonvested restricted stock awards not yet recognized was $ 44.7 million at december 31 , 2007 . we expect to recognize this compensation expense over a weighted average period of approximately 1.4 years . there are no other contractual terms covering restricted stock awards once vested. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the weighted average grant date fair value of our restricted stock awards from 2006 to 2007
Answer: 16.97%
Financial report context:
performance graph the annual changes for the period shown december 1 , 2013 ( when our ordinary shares began trading ) to december 31 , 2017 in the graph on this page are based on the assumption that $ 100 had been invested in allegion plc ordinary shares , the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index ( "s&p 500" ) and the standard & poor's 400 capital goods index ( "s&p 400 capital goods" ) on december 1 , 2013 , and that all quarterly dividends were reinvested . the total cumulative dollar returns shown on the graph represent the value that such investments would have had on december 31 , 2017 . december 1 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Financial table:
december 1 2013: allegion plc; december 31 2013: 100.00; december 31 2014: 102.20; december 31 2015: 129.03; december 31 2016: 154.37; december 31 2017: 150.97; column_7: 189.19
december 1 2013: s&p 500; december 31 2013: 100.00; december 31 2014: 102.53; december 31 2015: 116.57; december 31 2016: 118.18; december 31 2017: 132.31; column_7: 161.20
december 1 2013: s&p 400 capital goods; december 31 2013: 100.00; december 31 2014: 104.58; december 31 2015: 104.84; december 31 2016: 99.07; december 31 2017: 130.70; column_7: 162.97

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the annualized return for the investment in the allegion plc during 2013-2017?
Answer: 8.95%
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph compares the cumulative five-year total return provided shareholders on our class a common stock relative to the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and two customized peer groups . the old peer group includes intercontinentalexchange , inc. , nyse euronext and the nasdaq omx group inc . the new peer group is the same as the old peer group with the addition of cboe holdings , inc . which completed its initial public offering in june 2010 . an investment of $ 100 ( with reinvestment of all dividends ) is assumed to have been made in our class a common stock , in the peer groups and the s&p 500 index on december 31 , 2005 and its relative performance is tracked through december 31 , 2010 . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among cme group inc. , the s&p 500 index , an old peer group and a new peer group 12/05 12/06 12/07 12/08 12/09 12/10 cme group inc . s&p 500 old peer group *$ 100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 . copyright a9 2011 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . new peer group the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance .

Financial table:
2006: cme group inc .; 2007: $ 139.48; 2008: $ 188.81; 2009: $ 58.66; 2010: $ 96.37; column_6: $ 93.73
2006: s&p 500; 2007: 115.80; 2008: 122.16; 2009: 76.96; 2010: 97.33; column_6: 111.99
2006: old peer group; 2007: 155.58; 2008: 190.78; 2009: 72.25; 2010: 76.11; column_6: 87.61
2006: new peer group; 2007: 155.58; 2008: 190.78; 2009: 72.25; 2010: 76.11; column_6: 87.61

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the percentual return for s&p 500 in the first year?
Answer: 15.8%
Financial report context:
during 2014 , $ 91 million of provision recapture was recorded for purchased impaired loans compared to $ 11 million of provision expense for 2013 . the charge-offs ( which were specifically for commercial loans greater than a defined threshold ) during 2014 were $ 42 million compared to $ 104 million for 2013 . at december 31 , 2014 , the allowance for loan and lease losses was $ .9 billion on $ 4.4 billion of purchased impaired loans while the remaining $ .5 billion of purchased impaired loans required no allowance as the net present value of expected cash flows equaled or exceeded the recorded investment . as of december 31 , 2013 , the allowance for loan and lease losses related to purchased impaired loans was $ 1.0 billion . if any allowance for loan losses is recognized on a purchased impaired pool , which is accounted for as a single asset , the entire balance of that pool would be disclosed as requiring an allowance . subsequent increases in the net present value of cash flows will result in a provision recapture of any previously recorded allowance for loan and lease losses , to the extent applicable , and/or a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield , which will be recognized prospectively . individual loan transactions where final dispositions have occurred ( as noted above ) result in removal of the loans from their applicable pools for cash flow estimation purposes . the cash flow re-estimation process is completed quarterly to evaluate the appropriateness of the allowance associated with the purchased impaired loans . activity for the accretable yield during 2014 and 2013 follows : table 72 : purchased impaired loans 2013 accretable yield .

Financial table:
in millions: january 1; 2014: $ 2055; 2013: $ 2166
in millions: accretion ( including excess cash recoveries ); 2014: -587 ( 587 ); 2013: -695 ( 695 )
in millions: net reclassifications to accretable from non-accretable ( a ); 2014: 208; 2013: 613
in millions: disposals; 2014: -118 ( 118 ); 2013: -29 ( 29 )
in millions: december 31; 2014: $ 1558; 2013: $ 2055

Additional report context:
( a ) approximately 93% ( 93 % ) of net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2014 were within the commercial portfolio as compared to 37% ( 37 % ) for year ended december 31 , 2013 . note 5 allowances for loan and lease losses and unfunded loan commitments and letters of credit allowance for loan and lease losses we maintain the alll at levels that we believe to be appropriate to absorb estimated probable credit losses incurred in the portfolios as of the balance sheet date . we use the two main portfolio segments 2013 commercial lending and consumer lending 2013 and develop and document the alll under separate methodologies for each of these segments as discussed in note 1 accounting policies . a rollforward of the alll and associated loan data is presented below . the pnc financial services group , inc . 2013 form 10-k 143 .

Question: what was the dollar amount in millions for net reclassifications for the year ended december 31 , 2013 due to the commercial portfolio?
Answer: 760.35
Financial report context:
the hartford financial services group , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 5 . investments and derivative instruments ( continued ) collateral arrangements the company enters into various collateral arrangements in connection with its derivative instruments , which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , collateral pledged having a fair value of $ 1.1 billion and $ 790 , respectively , was included in fixed maturities , afs , in the consolidated balance sheets . from time to time , the company enters into secured borrowing arrangements as a means to increase net investment income . the company received cash collateral of $ 33 as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 . the following table presents the classification and carrying amount of loaned securities and derivative instruments collateral pledged. .

Financial table:
december 31 2011: fixed maturities afs; december 31 2010: $ 1086; column_3: $ 823
december 31 2011: short-term investments; december 31 2010: 199; column_3: 2014
december 31 2011: total collateral pledged; december 31 2010: $ 1285; column_3: $ 823

Additional report context:
as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the company had accepted collateral with a fair value of $ 2.6 billion and $ 1.5 billion , respectively , of which $ 2.0 billion and $ 1.1 billion , respectively , was cash collateral which was invested and recorded in the consolidated balance sheets in fixed maturities and short-term investments with corresponding amounts recorded in other assets and other liabilities . the company is only permitted by contract to sell or repledge the noncash collateral in the event of a default by the counterparty . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , noncash collateral accepted was held in separate custodial accounts and was not included in the company 2019s consolidated balance sheets . securities on deposit with states the company is required by law to deposit securities with government agencies in states where it conducts business . as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , the fair value of securities on deposit was approximately $ 1.6 billion and $ 1.4 billion , respectively. .

Question: what is the change in fair value of securities on deposits from 2010 to 2011 , ( in billions ) ?
Answer: 0.2