Financial report context:
2015 vs . 2014 on a gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.0% ( 24.0 % ) and 27.1% ( 27.1 % ) in 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the effective tax rate was higher in fiscal year 2014 primarily due to the goodwill impairment charge of $ 305.2 , which was not deductible for tax purposes , and the chilean tax reform enacted in september 2014 which increased income tax expense by $ 20.6 . these impacts were partially offset by an income tax benefit of $ 51.6 associated with losses from transactions and a tax election in a non-u.s . subsidiary . refer to note 10 , goodwill , and note 23 , income taxes , to the consolidated financial statements for additional information . on a non-gaap basis , the effective tax rate was 24.2% ( 24.2 % ) and 24.1% ( 24.1 % ) in 2015 and 2014 , respectively . discontinued operations on 29 march 2016 , the board of directors approved the company 2019s exit of its energy-from-waste ( efw ) business . as a result , efforts to start up and operate its two efw projects located in tees valley , united kingdom , have been discontinued . the decision to exit the business and stop development of the projects was based on continued difficulties encountered and the company 2019s conclusion , based on testing and analysis completed during the second quarter of fiscal year 2016 , that significant additional time and resources would be required to make the projects operational . in addition , the decision allows the company to execute its strategy of focusing resources on its core industrial gases business . the efw segment has been presented as a discontinued operation . prior year efw business segment information has been reclassified to conform to current year presentation . in fiscal 2016 , our loss from discontinued operations , net of tax , of $ 884.2 primarily resulted from the write down of assets to their estimated net realizable value and to record a liability for plant disposition and other costs . income tax benefits related only to one of the projects , as the other did not qualify for a local tax deduction . the loss from discontinued operations also includes land lease costs , commercial and administrative costs , and costs incurred for ongoing project exit activities . we expect additional exit costs of $ 50 to $ 100 to be recorded in future periods . in fiscal 2015 , our loss from discontinued operations , net of tax , related to efw was $ 6.8 . this resulted from costs for land leases and commercial and administrative expenses . in fiscal 2014 , our loss from discontinued operations , net of tax , was $ 2.9 . this included a loss , net of tax , of $ 7.5 for the cost of efw land leases and commercial and administrative expenses . this loss was partially offset by a gain of $ 3.9 for the sale of the remaining homecare business and settlement of contingencies related to a sale of a separate portion of the business to the linde group in 2012 . refer to note 4 , discontinued operations , for additional details . segment analysis industrial gases 2013 americas .

Financial table:
2016: sales; 2015: $ 3343.6; 2014: $ 3693.9; column_4: $ 4078.5
2016: operating income; 2015: 895.2; 2014: 808.4; column_4: 762.6
2016: operating margin; 2015: 26.8% ( 26.8 % ); 2014: 21.9% ( 21.9 % ); column_4: 18.7% ( 18.7 % )
2016: equity affiliates 2019 income; 2015: 52.7; 2014: 64.6; column_4: 60.9
2016: adjusted ebitda; 2015: 1390.4; 2014: 1289.9; column_4: 1237.9
2016: adjusted ebitda margin; 2015: 41.6% ( 41.6 % ); 2014: 34.9% ( 34.9 % ); column_4: 30.4% ( 30.4 % )

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the increase in the operating margin observed in 2015 and 2016?
Answer: 4.9%