alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2016 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Financial table:
2011: loews common stock; 2012: 100.0; 2013: 108.91; 2014: 129.64; 2015: 113.59; 2016: 104.47; column_7: 128.19
2011: s&p 500 index; 2012: 100.0; 2013: 116.00; 2014: 153.57; 2015: 174.60; 2016: 177.01; column_7: 198.18
2011: loews peer group ( a ); 2012: 100.0; 2013: 113.39; 2014: 142.85; 2015: 150.44; 2016: 142.44; column_7: 165.34

Additional report context:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : chubb limited ( name change from ace limited after it acquired the chubb corporation on january 15 , 2016 ) , w.r . berkley corporation , the chubb corporation ( included through january 15 , 2016 when it was acquired by ace limited ) , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco plc , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p . ( included through november 26 , 2014 when it was acquired by kinder morgan inc. ) , noble corporation , spectra energy corp , transocean ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2016 and 2015. .

Question: in 2016 what was the ratio of the s&p 500 index to loews common stock overall growth from 2011 to 2016
Answer: 1.5
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory liability of $ 61.6 million and $ 27.8 million as of december 31 , 2013 and 2012 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2013 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt , as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2014; column_2: $ 51637
amount ( in thousands ): 2015; column_2: 52253
amount ( in thousands ): 2016; column_2: 13750
amount ( in thousands ): 2017; column_2: 13750
amount ( in thousands ): 2018; column_2: 13750
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: 247500
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 392640
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 295226
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 97414

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the percent change in future minimum lease payments from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 280%
Financial report context:
the aes corporation notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) december 31 , 2011 , 2010 , and 2009 the table below sets forth the pre-tax accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) expected to be recognized as an increase ( decrease ) to income from continuing operations before income taxes over the next twelve months as of december 31 , 2011 for the following types of derivative instruments : accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): interest rate derivatives; column_2: $ -101 ( 101 )
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): cross currency derivatives; column_2: $ -1 ( 1 )
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): foreign currency derivatives; column_2: $ 7
accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( 1 ) ( in millions ): commodity and other derivatives; column_2: $ -1 ( 1 )

Additional report context:
( 1 ) excludes a loss of $ 94 million expected to be recognized as part of the sale of cartagena , which closed on february 9 , 2012 , and is further discussed in note 23 2014acquisitions and dispositions . the balance in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to derivative transactions will be reclassified into earnings as interest expense is recognized for interest rate hedges and cross currency swaps ( except for the amount reclassified to foreign currency transaction gains and losses to offset the remeasurement of the foreign currency-denominated debt being hedged by the cross currency swaps ) , as depreciation is recognized for interest rate hedges during construction , as foreign currency transaction gains and losses are recognized for hedges of foreign currency exposure , and as electricity sales and fuel purchases are recognized for hedges of forecasted electricity and fuel transactions . these balances are included in the consolidated statements of cash flows as operating and/or investing activities based on the nature of the underlying transaction . for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , pre-tax gains ( losses ) of $ 0 million , $ ( 1 ) million , and $ 0 million net of noncontrolling interests , respectively , were reclassified into earnings as a result of the discontinuance of a cash flow hedge because it was probable that the forecasted transaction would not occur by the end of the originally specified time period ( as documented at the inception of the hedging relationship ) or within an additional two-month time period thereafter. .

Question: the loss on the sale of cartagena is what percent of the aoci impact of interest rate derivatives?
Answer: 94%
Financial report context:
table of contents company stock performance the following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index for the five years ended september 26 , 2015 . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p information technology index and the dow jones u.s . technology supersector index as of the market close on september 24 , 2010 . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . * $ 100 invested on 9/25/10 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . data points are the last day of each fiscal year for the company 2019scommon stock and september 30th for indexes . copyright a9 2015 s&p , a division of mcgraw hill financial . all rights reserved . copyright a9 2015 dow jones & co . all rights reserved . september september september september september september .

Financial table:
september 2010: apple inc .; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 138; september 2013: $ 229; september 2014: $ 170; september 2015: $ 254; column_7: $ 294
september 2010: s&p 500 index; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 101; september 2013: $ 132; september 2014: $ 157; september 2015: $ 188; column_7: $ 187
september 2010: s&p information technology index; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 104; september 2013: $ 137; september 2014: $ 147; september 2015: $ 190; column_7: $ 194
september 2010: dow jones u.s . technology supersector index; september 2011: $ 100; september 2012: $ 103; september 2013: $ 134; september 2014: $ 141; september 2015: $ 183; column_7: $ 183

Additional report context:
apple inc . | 2015 form 10-k | 21 .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative total shareholder return for the five years ended 2015?
Answer: 194%
Financial report context:
entergy new orleans , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 3.9 million primarily due to higher net revenue , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and lower other income . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 13.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses and higher net revenue , partially offset by a higher effective income tax rate . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 293.9
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 39.0
amount ( in millions ): net gas revenue; column_2: -2.5 ( 2.5 )
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -5.1 ( 5.1 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -8.1 ( 8.1 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 317.2

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to an increase in the purchased power and capacity acquisition cost recovery rider , as approved by the city council , effective with the first billing cycle of march 2016 , primarily related to the purchase of power block 1 of the union power station . see note 14 to the financial statements for discussion of the union power station purchase . the net gas revenue variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to a decrease of 112 gwh , or 2% ( 2 % ) , in billed electricity usage , partially offset by the effect of favorable weather on commercial sales and a 2% ( 2 % ) increase in the average number of electric customers. .

Question: what was the combined impact in millions on 2016 net revenue from the net gas revenue adjustment , the volume/weather adjustment , and other adjustments?
Answer: -15.7
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 305.7 million primarily due to the effect of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which resulted in a decrease of $ 182.6 million in net income in 2017 , and the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the decrease in net income were higher other operation and maintenance expenses . the decrease was partially offset by higher net revenue and higher other income . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act and the irs audit . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 175.4 million primarily due to the effect of a settlement with the irs related to the 2010-2011 irs audit , which resulted in a $ 136.1 million reduction of income tax expense in 2016 . also contributing to the increase were lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenue , and higher other income . the increase was partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher interest expense , and higher nuclear refueling outage expenses . see note 3 to the financial statements for discussion of the irs audit . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 2438.4
amount ( in millions ): regulatory credit resulting from reduction of thefederal corporate income tax rate; column_2: 55.5
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 42.8
amount ( in millions ): louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation; column_2: 17.2
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -12.4 ( 12.4 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 19.0
amount ( in millions ): 2017 net revenue; column_2: $ 2560.5

Additional report context:
the regulatory credit resulting from reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate variance is due to the reduction of the vidalia purchased power agreement regulatory liability by $ 30.5 million and the reduction of the louisiana act 55 financing savings obligation regulatory liabilities by $ 25 million as a result of the enactment of the tax cuts and jobs act , in december 2017 , which lowered the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% ( 35 % ) to 21% ( 21 % ) . the effects of the tax cuts and jobs act are discussed further in note 3 to the financial statements. .

Question: in 2016 what was the ratio of the increase in the net income to the decrease in tax
Answer: 1.3
Financial report context:
incentive compensation cost the following table shows components of compensation expense , relating to certain of the incentive compensation programs described above : in a0millions a0of a0dollars 2018 2017 2016 charges for estimated awards to retirement-eligible employees $ 669 $ 659 $ 555 amortization of deferred cash awards , deferred cash stock units and performance stock units 202 354 336 immediately vested stock award expense ( 1 ) 75 70 73 amortization of restricted and deferred stock awards ( 2 ) 435 474 509 .

Financial table:
in millions of dollars: charges for estimated awards to retirement-eligible employees; 2018: $ 669; 2017: $ 659; 2016: $ 555
in millions of dollars: amortization of deferred cash awards deferred cash stock units and performance stock units; 2018: 202; 2017: 354; 2016: 336
in millions of dollars: immediately vested stock award expense ( 1 ); 2018: 75; 2017: 70; 2016: 73
in millions of dollars: amortization of restricted and deferred stock awards ( 2 ); 2018: 435; 2017: 474; 2016: 509
in millions of dollars: other variable incentive compensation; 2018: 640; 2017: 694; 2016: 710
in millions of dollars: total; 2018: $ 2021; 2017: $ 2251; 2016: $ 2183

Additional report context:
( 1 ) represents expense for immediately vested stock awards that generally were stock payments in lieu of cash compensation . the expense is generally accrued as cash incentive compensation in the year prior to grant . ( 2 ) all periods include amortization expense for all unvested awards to non-retirement-eligible employees. .

Question: in 2018 what was the percent of the incentive compensation associated with charges for estimated awards to retirement-eligible employees
Answer: 33.1%
Financial report context:
shareholder return performance presentation the graph presented below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on state street's common stock to the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 index , the s&p financial index and the kbw bank index over a five- year period . the cumulative total shareholder return assumes the investment of $ 100 in state street common stock and in each index on december 31 , 2008 at the closing price on the last trading day of 2008 , and also assumes reinvestment of common stock dividends . the s&p financial index is a publicly available measure of 81 of the standard & poor's 500 companies , representing 17 diversified financial services companies , 22 insurance companies , 19 real estate companies and 23 banking companies . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s. , and is composed of 24 leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts. .

Financial table:
2008: state street corporation; 2009: $ 100; 2010: $ 111; 2011: $ 118; 2012: $ 105; 2013: $ 125; column_7: $ 198
2008: s&p 500 index; 2009: 100; 2010: 126; 2011: 146; 2012: 149; 2013: 172; column_7: 228
2008: s&p financial index; 2009: 100; 2010: 117; 2011: 132; 2012: 109; 2013: 141; column_7: 191
2008: kbw bank index; 2009: 100; 2010: 98; 2011: 121; 2012: 93; 2013: 122; column_7: 168

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the roi of an investment in the state street corporation from 2008 to 2011?
Answer: 5%
Financial report context:
interest expense , net was $ 26.4 million , $ 14.6 million , and $ 5.3 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . interest expense includes the amortization of deferred financing costs , bank fees , capital and built-to-suit lease interest and interest expense under the credit and other long term debt facilities . amortization of deferred financing costs was $ 1.2 million , $ 0.8 million , and $ 0.6 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . the company monitors the financial health and stability of its lenders under the credit and other long term debt facilities , however during any period of significant instability in the credit markets lenders could be negatively impacted in their ability to perform under these facilities . 6 . commitments and contingencies obligations under operating leases the company leases warehouse space , office facilities , space for its brand and factory house stores and certain equipment under non-cancelable operating leases . the leases expire at various dates through 2033 , excluding extensions at the company 2019s option , and include provisions for rental adjustments . the table below includes executed lease agreements for brand and factory house stores that the company did not yet occupy as of december 31 , 2016 and does not include contingent rent the company may incur at its stores based on future sales above a specified minimum or payments made for maintenance , insurance and real estate taxes . the following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments for non-cancelable real property operating leases as of december 31 , 2016 as well as significant operating lease agreements entered into during the period after december 31 , 2016 through the date of this report : ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
2017: 2018; $ 114857: 127504
2017: 2019; $ 114857: 136040
2017: 2020; $ 114857: 133092
2017: 2021; $ 114857: 122753
2017: 2022 and thereafter; $ 114857: 788180
2017: total future minimum lease payments; $ 114857: $ 1422426

Additional report context:
included in selling , general and administrative expense was rent expense of $ 109.0 million , $ 83.0 million and $ 59.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively , under non-cancelable operating lease agreements . included in these amounts was contingent rent expense of $ 13.0 million , $ 11.0 million and $ 11.0 million for the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . sports marketing and other commitments within the normal course of business , the company enters into contractual commitments in order to promote the company 2019s brand and products . these commitments include sponsorship agreements with teams and athletes on the collegiate and professional levels , official supplier agreements , athletic event sponsorships and other marketing commitments . the following is a schedule of the company 2019s future minimum payments under its sponsorship and other marketing agreements as of december 31 .

Question: what percentage change in rent expense from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: 31.3%
Financial report context:
the containerboard group ( a division of tenneco packaging inc. ) notes to combined financial statements ( continued ) april 11 , 1999 14 . leases ( continued ) to the sale transaction on april 12 , 1999 . therefore , the remaining outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are as follows : ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
remainder of 1999: 2000; $ 7606: 7583
remainder of 1999: 2001; $ 7606: 4891
remainder of 1999: 2002; $ 7606: 3054
remainder of 1999: 2003; $ 7606: 1415
remainder of 1999: thereafter; $ 7606: 1178
remainder of 1999: total; $ 7606: $ 25727

Additional report context:
15 . sale of assets in the second quarter of 1996 , packaging entered into an agreement to form a joint venture with caraustar industries whereby packaging sold its two recycled paperboard mills and a fiber recycling operation and brokerage business to the joint venture in return for cash and a 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture . proceeds from the sale were approximately $ 115 million and the group recognized a $ 50 million pretax gain ( $ 30 million after taxes ) in the second quarter of 1996 . in june , 1998 , packaging sold its remaining 20% ( 20 % ) equity interest in the joint venture to caraustar industries for cash and a note of $ 26000000 . the group recognized a $ 15 million pretax gain on this transaction . at april 11 , 1999 , the balance of the note with accrued interest is $ 27122000 . the note was paid in june , 1999 . 16 . subsequent events on august 25 , 1999 , pca and packaging agreed that the acquisition consideration should be reduced as a result of a postclosing price adjustment by an amount equal to $ 20 million plus interest through the date of payment by packaging . the group recorded $ 11.9 million of this amount as part of the impairment charge on the accompanying financial statements , representing the amount that was previously estimated by packaging . pca intends to record the remaining amount in september , 1999 . in august , 1999 , pca signed purchase and sales agreements with various buyers to sell approximately 405000 acres of timberland . pca has completed the sale of approximately 260000 of these acres and expects to complete the sale of the remaining acres by mid-november , 1999. .

Question: what percentage of outstanding aggregate minimum rental commitments under noncancelable operating leases are due after 2003?
Answer: 5%
Financial report context:
performance graph this graph compares the return on lilly stock with that of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and our peer group for the years 2014 through 2018 . the graph assumes that , on december 31 , 2013 , a person invested $ 100 each in lilly stock , the s&p 500 stock index , and the peer groups' common stock . the graph measures total shareholder return , which takes into account both stock price and dividends . it assumes that dividends paid by a company are reinvested in that company 2019s stock . value of $ 100 invested on last business day of 2013 comparison of five-year cumulative total return among lilly , s&p 500 stock index , peer group ( 1 ) .

Financial table:
lilly: dec-13; peer group: $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
lilly: dec-14; peer group: $ 139.75; s&p 500: $ 114.39; column_4: $ 113.69
lilly: dec-15; peer group: $ 175.21; s&p 500: $ 116.56; column_4: $ 115.26
lilly: dec-16; peer group: $ 157.03; s&p 500: $ 112.80; column_4: $ 129.05
lilly: dec-17; peer group: $ 185.04; s&p 500: $ 128.90; column_4: $ 157.22
lilly: dec-18; peer group: $ 259.88; s&p 500: $ 136.56; column_4: $ 150.33

Additional report context:
( 1 ) we constructed the peer group as the industry index for this graph . it comprises the companies in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries that we used to benchmark the compensation of our executive officers for 2018 : abbvie inc. ; amgen inc. ; astrazeneca plc ; baxter international inc. ; biogen idec inc. ; bristol-myers squibb company ; celgene corporation ; gilead sciences inc. ; glaxosmithkline plc ; johnson & johnson ; medtronic plc ; merck & co. , inc. ; novartis ag. ; pfizer inc. ; roche holdings ag ; sanofi ; and shire plc. .

Question: as of december 312017 what was the ratio of the value of the lilly to the peer group
Answer: 1.44