alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
at december 31 , 2015 and 2014 , we had a modest working capital surplus . this reflects a strong cash position that provides enhanced liquidity in an uncertain economic environment . in addition , we believe we have adequate access to capital markets to meet any foreseeable cash requirements , and we have sufficient financial capacity to satisfy our current liabilities . cash flows .

Financial table:
millions: cash provided by operating activities; 2015: $ 7344; 2014: $ 7385; 2013: $ 6823
millions: cash used in investing activities; 2015: -4476 ( 4476 ); 2014: -4249 ( 4249 ); 2013: -3405 ( 3405 )
millions: cash used in financing activities; 2015: -3063 ( 3063 ); 2014: -2982 ( 2982 ); 2013: -3049 ( 3049 )
millions: net change in cash and cash equivalents; 2015: $ -195 ( 195 ); 2014: $ 154; 2013: $ 369

Additional report context:
operating activities cash provided by operating activities decreased in 2015 compared to 2014 due to lower net income and changes in working capital , partially offset by the timing of tax payments . federal tax law provided for 100% ( 100 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2011 and 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for qualified investments made during 2012-2013 . as a result , the company deferred a substantial portion of its 2011-2013 income tax expense , contributing to the positive operating cash flow in those years . congress extended 50% ( 50 % ) bonus depreciation for 2014 , but this extension occurred in december , and the related benefit was realized in 2015 , rather than 2014 . similarly , in december of 2015 , congress extended bonus depreciation through 2019 , which delayed the benefit of 2015 bonus depreciation into 2016 . bonus depreciation will be at a rate of 50% ( 50 % ) for 2015 , 2016 and 2017 , 40% ( 40 % ) for 2018 and 30% ( 30 % ) for 2019 . higher net income in 2014 increased cash provided by operating activities compared to 2013 , despite higher income tax payments . 2014 income tax payments were higher than 2013 primarily due to higher income , but also because we paid taxes previously deferred by bonus depreciation . investing activities higher capital investments in locomotives and freight cars , including $ 327 million in early lease buyouts , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2015 compared to 2014 . higher capital investments , including the early buyout of the long-term operating lease of our headquarters building for approximately $ 261 million , drove the increase in cash used in investing activities in 2014 compared to 2013 . significant investments also were made for new locomotives , freight cars and containers , and capacity and commercial facility projects . capital investments in 2014 also included $ 99 million for the early buyout of locomotives and freight cars under long-term operating leases , which we exercised due to favorable economic terms and market conditions. .

Question: what was the percentage change in cash provided by operating activities from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 8%
Financial report context:
comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s. ) index and the peer group .

Financial table:
12/31/2011: lkq corporation; 12/31/2012: $ 100; 12/31/2013: $ 140; 12/31/2014: $ 219; 12/31/2015: $ 187; 12/31/2016: $ 197; column_7: $ 204
12/31/2011: s&p 500 index; 12/31/2012: $ 100; 12/31/2013: $ 113; 12/31/2014: $ 147; 12/31/2015: $ 164; 12/31/2016: $ 163; column_7: $ 178
12/31/2011: peer group; 12/31/2012: $ 100; 12/31/2013: $ 111; 12/31/2014: $ 140; 12/31/2015: $ 177; 12/31/2016: $ 188; column_7: $ 217

Additional report context:
this stock performance information is "furnished" and shall not be deemed to be "soliciting material" or subject to rule 14a , shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of section 18 of the securities exchange act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that section , and shall not be deemed incorporated by reference in any filing under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , whether made before or after the date of this report and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in any such filing , except to the extent that it specifically incorporates the information by reference . information about our common stock that may be issued under our equity compensation plans as of december 31 , 2016 included in part iii , item 12 of this annual report on form 10-k is incorporated herein by reference. .

Question: based on the review of the comparison of cumulative return among lkq corporation , the nasdaq stock market ( u.s . ) index and the peer group what was the ratio of the lkq performance to the peer group in 2013
Answer: 1.6
Financial report context:
stock performance graph * $ 100 invested on 11/17/11 in our stock or 10/31/11 in the relevant index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending december 31 , 2014 . ( 1 ) delphi automotive plc ( 2 ) s&p 500 2013 standard & poor 2019s 500 total return index ( 3 ) automotive supplier peer group 2013 russell 3000 auto parts index , including american axle & manufacturing , borgwarner inc. , cooper tire & rubber company , dana holding corp. , delphi automotive plc , dorman products inc. , federal-mogul corp. , ford motor co. , fuel systems solutions inc. , general motors co. , gentex corp. , gentherm inc. , genuine parts co. , johnson controls inc. , lkq corp. , lear corp. , meritor inc. , remy international inc. , standard motor products inc. , stoneridge inc. , superior industries international , trw automotive holdings corp. , tenneco inc. , tesla motors inc. , the goodyear tire & rubber co. , tower international inc. , visteon corp. , and wabco holdings inc . company index november 17 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 , december 31 .

Financial table:
company index: delphi automotive plc ( 1 ); november 17 2011: $ 100.00; december 31 2011: $ 100.98; december 31 2012: $ 179.33; december 31 2013: $ 285.81; december 31 2014: $ 350.82
company index: s&p 500 ( 2 ); november 17 2011: 100.00; december 31 2011: 100.80; december 31 2012: 116.93; december 31 2013: 154.80; december 31 2014: 175.99
company index: automotive supplier peer group ( 3 ); november 17 2011: 100.00; december 31 2011: 89.27; december 31 2012: 110.41; december 31 2013: 166.46; december 31 2014: 178.05

Additional report context:
dividends on february 26 , 2013 , the board of directors approved the initiation of dividend payments on the company's ordinary shares . the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.17 per ordinary share that was paid in each quarter of 2013 . in january 2014 , the board of directors increased the quarterly dividend rate to $ 0.25 per ordinary share , which was paid in each quarter of 2014 . in addition , in january 2015 , the board of directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $ 0.25 per ordinary share , payable on february 27 , 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on february 18 , 2015. .

Question: what is the difference between the highest and lowest return for the first year of the investment?
Answer: 68.92%
Financial report context:
item 1b . unresolved staff comments not applicable . item 2 . properties as of december 26 , 2015 , our major facilities consisted of : ( square feet in millions ) united states countries total owned facilities1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30.7 17.2 47.9 leased facilities2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.1 6.0 8.1 .

Financial table:
( square feet in millions ): owned facilities1; unitedstates: 30.7; othercountries: 17.2; total: 47.9
( square feet in millions ): leased facilities2; unitedstates: 2.1; othercountries: 6.0; total: 8.1
( square feet in millions ): total facilities; unitedstates: 32.8; othercountries: 23.2; total: 56.0

Additional report context:
1 leases on portions of the land used for these facilities expire on varying dates through 2062 . 2 leases expire on varying dates through 2030 and generally include renewals at our option . our principal executive offices are located in the u.s . and a majority of our wafer fabrication activities are also located in the u.s . we completed construction of development fabrication facilities in oregon during 2014 that we expect will enable us to maintain our process technology lead . we also completed construction of a large-scale fabrication building in arizona in 2013 . a portion of the new oregon and arizona facilities are currently not in use and we are reserving the new buildings for additional capacity and future technologies . incremental construction and equipment installation are required to ready the facilities for their intended use . our massachusetts fabrication facility was our last manufacturing facility on 200mm wafers and ceased production in q1 2015 . outside the u.s. , we have wafer fabrication facilities in ireland , israel , and china . our fabrication facility in ireland has transitioned to our 14nm process technology , with manufacturing continuing to ramp in 2016 . additionally , in the second half of 2016 , we will start using our facility in dalian , china to help expand our manufacturing capacity in next-generation memory . our assembly and test facilities are located in malaysia , china , and vietnam . in addition , we have sales and marketing offices worldwide that are generally located near major concentrations of customers . we believe that the facilities described above are suitable and adequate for our present purposes and that the productive capacity in our facilities is substantially being utilized or we have plans to utilize it . we do not identify or allocate assets by operating segment . for information on net property , plant and equipment by country , see 201cnote 26 : operating segments and geographic information 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 3 . legal proceedings for a discussion of legal proceedings , see 201cnote 25 : contingencies 201d in part ii , item 8 of this form 10-k . item 4 . mine safety disclosures not applicable. .

Question: what percentage of total facilities as measured in square feet are leased?
Answer: 14%
Financial report context:
performance graph the table below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on our common stock with the cumulative total return of ( i ) the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index ( "s&p 500 index" ) , ( ii ) the standard & poor's industrials index ( "s&p industrials index" ) and ( iii ) the standard & poor's consumer durables & apparel index ( "s&p consumer durables & apparel index" ) , from december 31 , 2012 through december 31 , 2017 , when the closing price of our common stock was $ 43.94 . the graph assumes investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 in our common stock and in each of the three indices and the reinvestment of dividends . the table below sets forth the value , as of december 31 for each of the years indicated , of a $ 100 investment made on december 31 , 2012 in each of our common stock , the s&p 500 index , the s&p industrials index and the s&p consumer durables & apparel index and includes the reinvestment of dividends. .

Financial table:
2013: masco; 2014: $ 138.48; 2015: $ 155.26; 2016: $ 200.79; 2017: $ 227.08; column_6: $ 318.46
2013: s&p 500 index; 2014: $ 132.04; 2015: $ 149.89; 2016: $ 151.94; 2017: $ 169.82; column_6: $ 206.49
2013: s&p industrials index; 2014: $ 140.18; 2015: $ 153.73; 2016: $ 149.83; 2017: $ 177.65; column_6: $ 214.55
2013: s&p consumer durables & apparel index; 2014: $ 135.84; 2015: $ 148.31; 2016: $ 147.23; 2017: $ 138.82; column_6: $ 164.39

Additional report context:
$ 50.00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 $ 200.00 $ 250.00 $ 300.00 $ 350.00 masco s&p 500 index s&p industrials index s&p consumer durables & apparel index .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on masco common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five year period ended 2017?
Answer: 111.97%
Financial report context:
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 comparison of five-year cumulative total shareholder return altria group , inc . altria peer group s&p 500 part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities . performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return of altria group , inc . 2019s common stock for the last ive years with the cumulative total return for the same period of the s&p 500 index and the altria group , inc . peer group ( 1 ) . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in common stock and each of the indices as of the market close on december 31 , 2011 and the reinvestment of all dividends on a quarterly basis . source : bloomberg - 201ctotal return analysis 201d calculated on a daily basis and assumes reinvestment of dividends as of the ex-dividend date . ( 1 ) in 2016 , the altria group , inc . peer group consisted of u.s.-headquartered consumer product companies that are competitors to altria group , inc . 2019s tobacco operating companies subsidiaries or that have been selected on the basis of revenue or market capitalization : campbell soup company , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive company , conagra brands , inc. , general mills , inc. , the hershey company , kellogg company , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft heinz company , mondel 0113z international , inc. , pepsico , inc . and reynolds american inc . note - on october 1 , 2012 , kraft foods inc . ( kft ) spun off kraft foods group , inc . ( krft ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from kraft foods inc . to mondel 0113z international , inc . ( mdlz ) . on july 2 , 2015 , kraft foods group , inc . merged with and into a wholly owned subsidiary of h.j . heinz holding corporation , which was renamed the kraft heinz company ( khc ) . on june 12 , 2015 , reynolds american inc . ( rai ) acquired lorillard , inc . ( lo ) . on november 9 , 2016 , conagra foods , inc . ( cag ) spun off lamb weston holdings , inc . ( lw ) to its shareholders and then changed its name from conagra foods , inc . to conagra brands , inc . ( cag ) . .

Financial table:
date: december 2011; altria group inc .: $ 100.00; altria group inc . peer group: $ 100.00; s&p 500: $ 100.00
date: december 2012; altria group inc .: $ 111.77; altria group inc . peer group: $ 108.78; s&p 500: $ 115.99
date: december 2013; altria group inc .: $ 143.69; altria group inc . peer group: $ 135.61; s&p 500: $ 153.55
date: december 2014; altria group inc .: $ 193.28; altria group inc . peer group: $ 151.74; s&p 500: $ 174.55
date: december 2015; altria group inc .: $ 237.92; altria group inc . peer group: $ 177.04; s&p 500: $ 176.94
date: december 2016; altria group inc .: $ 286.61; altria group inc . peer group: $ 192.56; s&p 500: $ 198.09

Additional report context:
altria altria group , inc . group , inc . peer group s&p 500 .

Question: did altria outperform the s&p 500?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
other items on our consolidated financial statements have been appropriately adjusted from the amounts provided in the earnings release , including a reduction of our full year 2016 gross profit and income from operations by $ 2.9 million , and a reduction of net income by $ 1.7 million. .

Financial table:
( in thousands ): cash and cash equivalents; at december 31 , 2016: $ 250470; at december 31 , 2015: $ 129852; at december 31 , 2014: $ 593175; at december 31 , 2013: $ 347489; at december 31 , 2012: $ 341841
( in thousands ): working capital ( 1 ); at december 31 , 2016: 1279337; at december 31 , 2015: 1019953; at december 31 , 2014: 1127772; at december 31 , 2013: 702181; at december 31 , 2012: 651370
( in thousands ): inventories; at december 31 , 2016: 917491; at december 31 , 2015: 783031; at december 31 , 2014: 536714; at december 31 , 2013: 469006; at december 31 , 2012: 319286
( in thousands ): total assets; at december 31 , 2016: 3644331; at december 31 , 2015: 2865970; at december 31 , 2014: 2092428; at december 31 , 2013: 1576369; at december 31 , 2012: 1155052
( in thousands ): total debt including current maturities; at december 31 , 2016: 817388; at december 31 , 2015: 666070; at december 31 , 2014: 281546; at december 31 , 2013: 151551; at december 31 , 2012: 59858
( in thousands ): total stockholders 2019 equity; at december 31 , 2016: $ 2030900; at december 31 , 2015: $ 1668222; at december 31 , 2014: $ 1350300; at december 31 , 2013: $ 1053354; at december 31 , 2012: $ 816922

Additional report context:
( 1 ) working capital is defined as current assets minus current liabilities. .

Question: what is the debt-to-asset ratio?
Answer: 22.4%
Financial report context:
2 0 1 9 a n n u a l r e p o r t1 6 performance graph the following chart presents a comparison for the five-year period ended june 30 , 2019 , of the market performance of the company 2019s common stock with the s&p 500 index and an index of peer companies selected by the company . historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return among jack henry & associates , inc. , the s&p 500 index , and a peer group the following information depicts a line graph with the following values: .

Financial table:
2014: jkhy; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 110.51; 2017: 151.12; 2018: 182.15; 2019: 231.36; column_7: 240.29
2014: 2019 peer group; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 126.23; 2017: 142.94; 2018: 166.15; 2019: 224.73; column_7: 281.09
2014: 2018 peer group; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 127.40; 2017: 151.16; 2018: 177.26; 2019: 228.97; column_7: 286.22
2014: s&p 500; 2015: 100.00; 2016: 107.42; 2017: 111.71; 2018: 131.70; 2019: 150.64; column_7: 166.33

Additional report context:
this comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on june 30 , 2014 , and assumes reinvestments of dividends . total returns are calculated according to market capitalization of peer group members at the beginning of each period . peer companies selected are in the business of providing specialized computer software , hardware and related services to financial institutions and other businesses . some peer participant companies were different for fiscal year ended 2019 compared to fiscal year ended 2018 . the company 2019s compensation committee of the board of directors adjusted the peer participants due to consolidations within the industry during the 2019 fiscal year . companies in the 2019 peer group are aci worldwide , inc. ; black knight , inc. ; bottomline technologies , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions , inc. ; cardtronics plc ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; exlservice holdings , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; fleetcor technologies , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; square , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total system services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verint systems , inc. ; and wex , inc . companies in the 2018 peer group were aci worldwide , inc. ; bottomline technology , inc. ; broadridge financial solutions ; cardtronics , inc. ; corelogic , inc. ; euronet worldwide , inc. ; fair isaac corp. ; fidelity national information services , inc. ; fiserv , inc. ; global payments , inc. ; moneygram international , inc. ; ss&c technologies holdings , inc. ; total systems services , inc. ; tyler technologies , inc. ; verifone .

Question: was the five year total return of the 2019 peer group greater than the 2018 peer group?
Answer: no
Financial report context:
supplementary information on oil and gas producing activities ( unaudited ) changes in the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows ( in millions ) 2011 2010 2009 .

Financial table:
( in millions ): sales and transfers of oil and gas produced net of production and administrative costs; 2011: $ -7922 ( 7922 ); 2010: $ -6330 ( 6330 ); 2009: $ -4876 ( 4876 )
( in millions ): net changes in prices and production and administrative costs related to future production; 2011: 12313; 2010: 9843; 2009: 4840
( in millions ): extensions discoveries and improved recovery less related costs; 2011: 1454; 2010: 1268; 2009: 1399
( in millions ): development costs incurred during the period; 2011: 1899; 2010: 2546; 2009: 2786
( in millions ): changes in estimated future development costs; 2011: -1349 ( 1349 ); 2010: -2153 ( 2153 ); 2009: -3773 ( 3773 )
( in millions ): revisions of previous quantity estimates; 2011: 2526; 2010: 1117; 2009: 5110
( in millions ): net changes in purchases and sales of minerals in place; 2011: 233; 2010: -20 ( 20 ); 2009: -159 ( 159 )
( in millions ): accretion of discount; 2011: 2040; 2010: 1335; 2009: 787
( in millions ): net change in income taxes; 2011: -6676 ( 6676 ); 2010: -4231 ( 4231 ); 2009: -4345 ( 4345 )
( in millions ): timing and other; 2011: 130; 2010: 250; 2009: -149 ( 149 )
( in millions ): net change for the year; 2011: 4648; 2010: 3625; 2009: 1620
( in millions ): beginning of the year; 2011: 9280; 2010: 5655; 2009: 4035
( in millions ): end of year; 2011: $ 13928; 2010: $ 9280; 2009: $ 5655

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the average net annual change in discounted future net cash flows ( in millions ) for the years 2011 , 2010 , and 2009?
Answer: 3298
Financial report context:
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income increased $ 0.8 million primarily due to higher other income , lower other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower interest expense , substantially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses and a higher effective income tax rate . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 705.4
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: -18.2 ( 18.2 )
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 13.5
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 2.4
amount ( in millions ): 2017 net revenue; column_2: $ 703.1

Additional report context:
the volume/weather variance is primarily due to the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in rates , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in the energy efficiency rider , effective with the first billing cycle of february 2017 , each as approved by the mpsc . the increase was partially offset by decreased storm damage rider revenues due to resetting the storm damage provision to zero beginning with the november 2016 billing cycle . entergy mississippi resumed billing the storm damage rider effective with the september 2017 billing cycle . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion of the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider. .

Question: what was the average net revenue between 2016 and 2017 in millions
Answer: 704.25