alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
federal realty investment trust schedule iii summary of real estate and accumulated depreciation 2014continued three years ended december 31 , 2010 reconciliation of accumulated depreciation and amortization ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
balance december 31 2007: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense; $ 756703: 101321
balance december 31 2007: deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property; $ 756703: -11766 ( 11766 )
balance december 31 2007: balance december 31 2008; $ 756703: 846258
balance december 31 2007: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense; $ 756703: 103698
balance december 31 2007: deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property; $ 756703: -11869 ( 11869 )
balance december 31 2007: balance december 31 2009; $ 756703: 938087
balance december 31 2007: additions during period 2014depreciation and amortization expense; $ 756703: 108261
balance december 31 2007: deductions during period 2014disposition and retirements of property; $ 756703: -11144 ( 11144 )
balance december 31 2007: balance december 31 2010; $ 756703: $ 1035204

Additional report context:
.

Question: considering the years 2009-2010 , what is the increase in the final balance?
Answer: 10.35%
Financial report context:
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2014 and 2013 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note . geosouthern debt in december 2013 , in conjunction with the planned geosouthern acquisition , devon issued $ 2.25 billion aggregate principal amount of fixed and floating rate senior notes resulting in cash proceeds of approximately $ 2.2 billion , net of discounts and issuance costs . the floating rate senior notes due in 2015 bear interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.45 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the floating rate senior notes due in 2016 bears interest at a rate equal to three-month libor plus 0.54 percent , which rate will be reset quarterly . the schedule below summarizes the key terms of these notes ( in millions ) . .

Financial table:
floating rate due december 15 2015: floating rate due december 15 2016; $ 500: 350
floating rate due december 15 2015: 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) due december 15 2016 ( 1 ); $ 500: 650
floating rate due december 15 2015: 2.25% ( 2.25 % ) due december 15 2018; $ 500: 750
floating rate due december 15 2015: discount and issuance costs; $ 500: -2 ( 2 )
floating rate due december 15 2015: net proceeds; $ 500: $ 2248

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the 1.20% ( 1.20 % ) $ 650 million note due december 15 , 2016 was redeemed on november 13 , 2014 . the senior notes were classified as short-term debt on devon 2019s consolidated balance sheet as of december 31 , 2013 due to certain redemption features in the event that the geosouthern acquisition was not completed on or prior to june 30 , 2014 . on february 28 , 2014 , the geosouthern acquisition closed and thus the senior notes were subsequently classified as long-term debt . additionally , during december 2013 , devon entered into a term loan agreement with a group of major financial institutions pursuant to which devon could draw up to $ 2.0 billion to finance , in part , the geosouthern acquisition and to pay transaction costs . in february 2014 , devon drew the $ 2.0 billion of term loans for the geosouthern transaction , and the amount was subsequently repaid on june 30 , 2014 with the canadian divestiture proceeds that were repatriated to the u.s . in june 2014 , at which point the term loan was terminated. .

Question: what is the ratio of the floating rate due december 2015 compared to 2016
Answer: 1.43
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following table presents reported quarterly high and low per share sale prices of our class a common stock on the new york stock exchange ( 201cnyse 201d ) for the years 2007 and 2006. .

Financial table:
2007: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 41.31; low: $ 36.63
2007: quarter ended june 30; high: 43.84; low: 37.64
2007: quarter ended september 30; high: 45.45; low: 36.34
2007: quarter ended december 31; high: 46.53; low: 40.08
2007: 2006; high: high; low: low
2007: quarter ended march 31; high: $ 32.68; low: $ 26.66
2007: quarter ended june 30; high: 35.75; low: 27.35
2007: quarter ended september 30; high: 36.92; low: 29.98
2007: quarter ended december 31; high: 38.74; low: 35.21

Additional report context:
on february 29 , 2008 , the closing price of our class a common stock was $ 38.44 per share as reported on the nyse . as of february 29 , 2008 , we had 395748826 outstanding shares of class a common stock and 528 registered holders . dividends we have never paid a dividend on any class of our common stock . we anticipate that we may retain future earnings , if any , to fund the development and growth of our business . the indentures governing our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.50% ( 201c7.50 % ) notes 201d ) and our 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) senior notes due 2012 ( 201c7.125% ( 201c7.125 % ) notes 201d ) may prohibit us from paying dividends to our stockholders unless we satisfy certain financial covenants . the loan agreement for our revolving credit facility and the indentures governing the terms of our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes contain covenants that restrict our ability to pay dividends unless certain financial covenants are satisfied . in addition , while spectrasite and its subsidiaries are classified as unrestricted subsidiaries under the indentures for our 7.50% ( 7.50 % ) notes and 7.125% ( 7.125 % ) notes , certain of spectrasite 2019s subsidiaries are subject to restrictions on the amount of cash that they can distribute to us under the loan agreement related to our securitization . for more information about the restrictions under the loan agreement for the revolving credit facility , our notes indentures and the loan agreement related to the securitization , see item 7 of this annual report under the caption 201cmanagement 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2014liquidity and capital resources 2014factors affecting sources of liquidity 201d and note 3 to our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. .

Question: what is the average number of shares per registered holder as of february 29 , 2008?
Answer: 749524
Financial report context:
performance graph the graph below compares the cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock with the cumulative total return for the same period of pmi's peer group and the s&p 500 index . the graph assumes the investment of $ 100 as of december 31 , 2012 , in pmi common stock ( at prices quoted on the new york stock exchange ) and each of the indices as of the market close and reinvestment of dividends on a quarterly basis . date pmi pmi peer group ( 1 ) s&p 500 index .

Financial table:
date: december 31 2012; pmi: $ 100.00; pmi peer group ( 1 ): $ 100.00; s&p 500 index: $ 100.00
date: december 31 2013; pmi: $ 108.50; pmi peer group ( 1 ): $ 122.80; s&p 500 index: $ 132.40
date: december 31 2014; pmi: $ 106.20; pmi peer group ( 1 ): $ 132.50; s&p 500 index: $ 150.50
date: december 31 2015; pmi: $ 120.40; pmi peer group ( 1 ): $ 143.50; s&p 500 index: $ 152.60
date: december 31 2016; pmi: $ 130.80; pmi peer group ( 1 ): $ 145.60; s&p 500 index: $ 170.80
date: december 31 2017; pmi: $ 156.80; pmi peer group ( 1 ): $ 172.70; s&p 500 index: $ 208.10

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the pmi peer group presented in this graph is the same as that used in the prior year , except reynolds american inc . was removed following the completion of its acquisition by british american tobacco p.l.c . on july 25 , 2017 . the pmi peer group was established based on a review of four characteristics : global presence ; a focus on consumer products ; and net revenues and a market capitalization of a similar size to those of pmi . the review also considered the primary international tobacco companies . as a result of this review , the following companies constitute the pmi peer group : altria group , inc. , anheuser-busch inbev sa/nv , british american tobacco p.l.c. , the coca-cola company , colgate-palmolive co. , diageo plc , heineken n.v. , imperial brands plc , japan tobacco inc. , johnson & johnson , kimberly-clark corporation , the kraft-heinz company , mcdonald's corp. , mondel z international , inc. , nestl e9 s.a. , pepsico , inc. , the procter & gamble company , roche holding ag , and unilever nv and plc . note : figures are rounded to the nearest $ 0.10. .

Question: what was the difference in percentage cumulative total shareholder return on pmi's common stock versus the s&p 500 index for the five years ended december 31 , 2017?
Answer: -51.3%
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2002 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/02 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/02 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Financial table:
global payments: may 31 2002; s&p 500: $ 100.00; s&p information technology: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
global payments: may 31 2003; s&p 500: 94.20; s&p information technology: 91.94; column_4: 94.48
global payments: may 31 2004; s&p 500: 129.77; s&p information technology: 108.79; column_4: 115.24
global payments: may 31 2005; s&p 500: 193.30; s&p information technology: 117.75; column_4: 116.29
global payments: may 31 2006; s&p 500: 260.35; s&p information technology: 127.92; column_4: 117.14
global payments: may 31 2007; s&p 500: 224.24; s&p information technology: 157.08; column_4: 144.11

Additional report context:
issuer purchases of equity securities on april 5 , 2007 , our board of directors authorized repurchases of our common stock in an amount up to $ 100 million . the board has authorized us to purchase shares from time to time as market conditions permit . there is no expiration date with respect to this authorization . no amounts have been repurchased during the fiscal year ended may 31 , 2007. .

Question: what will be the rate of return for global payments from 2002 to 2003?
Answer: -5.8%
Financial report context:
company stock performance the following graph shows a five-year comparison of cumulative total shareholder return , calculated on a dividend reinvested basis , for the company , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested in each of the company 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 composite index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones u.s . technology index as of the market close on september 30 , 2007 . data points on the graph are annual . note that historic stock price performance is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . sep-11sep-10sep-09sep-08sep-07 sep-12 apple inc . s&p 500 s&p computer hardware dow jones us technology comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among apple inc. , the s&p 500 index , the s&p computer hardware index , and the dow jones us technology index *$ 100 invested on 9/30/07 in stock or index , including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending september 30 . copyright a9 2012 s&p , a division of the mcgraw-hill companies inc . all rights reserved . september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 , september 30 .

Financial table:
september 30 2007: apple inc .; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 74; september 30 2010: $ 121; september 30 2011: $ 185; september 30 2012: $ 248; column_7: $ 437
september 30 2007: s&p 500; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 78; september 30 2010: $ 73; september 30 2011: $ 80; september 30 2012: $ 81; column_7: $ 105
september 30 2007: s&p computer hardware; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 84; september 30 2010: $ 99; september 30 2011: $ 118; september 30 2012: $ 134; column_7: $ 214
september 30 2007: dow jones us technology; september 30 2008: $ 100; september 30 2009: $ 76; september 30 2010: $ 85; september 30 2011: $ 95; september 30 2012: $ 98; column_7: $ 127

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the cumulative total return on apple stock between september 30 2007 and september 30 2012?
Answer: 337
Financial report context:
as of december 31 , 2006 , the company also leased an office and laboratory facility in connecticut , additional office , distribution and storage facilities in san diego , and four foreign facilities located in japan , singapore , china and the netherlands under non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times through june 2011 . these leases contain renewal options ranging from one to five years . as of december 31 , 2006 , annual future minimum payments under these operating leases were as follows ( in thousands ) : .

Financial table:
2007: 2008; 5320: 5335
2007: 2009; 5320: 5075
2007: 2010; 5320: 4659
2007: 2011; 5320: 4712
2007: 2012 and thereafter; 5320: 12798
2007: total; 5320: $ 37899

Additional report context:
rent expense , net of amortization of the deferred gain on sale of property , was $ 4723041 , $ 4737218 , and $ 1794234 for the years ended december 31 , 2006 , january 1 , 2006 and january 2 , 2005 , respectively . 6 . stockholders 2019 equity common stock as of december 31 , 2006 , the company had 46857512 shares of common stock outstanding , of which 4814744 shares were sold to employees and consultants subject to restricted stock agreements . the restricted common shares vest in accordance with the provisions of the agreements , generally over five years . all unvested shares are subject to repurchase by the company at the original purchase price . as of december 31 , 2006 , 36000 shares of common stock were subject to repurchase . in addition , the company also issued 12000 shares for a restricted stock award to an employee under the company 2019s new 2005 stock and incentive plan based on service performance . these shares vest monthly over a three-year period . stock options 2005 stock and incentive plan in june 2005 , the stockholders of the company approved the 2005 stock and incentive plan ( the 2005 stock plan ) . upon adoption of the 2005 stock plan , issuance of options under the company 2019s existing 2000 stock plan ceased . the 2005 stock plan provides that an aggregate of up to 11542358 shares of the company 2019s common stock be reserved and available to be issued . in addition , the 2005 stock plan provides for an automatic annual increase in the shares reserved for issuance by the lesser of 5% ( 5 % ) of outstanding shares of the company 2019s common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year , 1200000 shares or such lesser amount as determined by the company 2019s board of directors . illumina , inc . notes to consolidated financial statements 2014 ( continued ) .

Question: what percentage of annual future minimum payments under operating leases are due in 2008?
Answer: 14%
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , llc and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis plan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business see the 201cplan to spin off the utility 2019s transmission business 201d section of entergy corporation and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis for a discussion of this matter , including the planned retirement of debt and preferred securities . results of operations net income 2011 compared to 2010 net income increased $ 242.5 million primarily due to a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts , which resulted in a $ 422 million income tax benefit . the net income effect was partially offset by a $ 199 million regulatory charge , which reduced net revenue , because a portion of the benefit will be shared with customers . see note 3 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . 2010 compared to 2009 net income decreased slightly by $ 1.4 million primarily due to higher other operation and maintenance expenses , a higher effective income tax rate , and higher interest expense , almost entirely offset by higher net revenue . net revenue 2011 compared to 2010 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2011 to 2010 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2010 net revenue; column_2: $ 1043.7
amount ( in millions ): mark-to-market tax settlement sharing; column_2: -195.9 ( 195.9 )
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 32.5
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 11.6
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -5.7 ( 5.7 )
amount ( in millions ): 2011 net revenue; column_2: $ 886.2

Additional report context:
the mark-to-market tax settlement sharing variance results from a regulatory charge because a portion of the benefits of a settlement with the irs related to the mark-to-market income tax treatment of power purchase contracts will be shared with customers , slightly offset by the amortization of a portion of that charge beginning in october 2011 . see notes 3 and 8 to the financial statements for additional discussion of the settlement and benefit sharing . the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a formula rate plan increase effective may 2011 . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the formula rate plan increase. .

Question: what was the percent of the change in the net revenue from 2010 to 2011
Answer: 15.1%
Financial report context:
vornado realty trust notes to consolidated financial statements ( continued ) 17 . leases as lessor : we lease space to tenants under operating leases . most of the leases provide for the payment of fixed base rentals payable monthly in advance . office building leases generally require the tenants to reimburse us for operating costs and real estate taxes above their base year costs . shopping center leases provide for pass-through to tenants the tenant 2019s share of real estate taxes , insurance and maintenance . shopping center leases also provide for the payment by the lessee of additional rent based on a percentage of the tenants 2019 sales . as of december 31 , 2011 , future base rental revenue under non-cancelable operating leases , excluding rents for leases with an original term of less than one year and rents resulting from the exercise of renewal options , is as follows : ( amounts in thousands ) year ending december 31: .

Financial table:
2012: 2013; $ 1807885: 1718403
2012: 2014; $ 1807885: 1609279
2012: 2015; $ 1807885: 1425804
2012: 2016; $ 1807885: 1232154
2012: thereafter; $ 1807885: 6045584

Additional report context:
these amounts do not include percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales . these percentage rents approximated $ 8482000 , $ 7912000 and $ 8394000 , for the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 , respectively . none of our tenants accounted for more than 10% ( 10 % ) of total revenues in any of the years ended december 31 , 2011 , 2010 and 2009 . former bradlees locations pursuant to a master agreement and guaranty , dated may 1 , 1992 , we are due $ 5000000 per annum of additional rent from stop & shop which was allocated to certain bradlees former locations . on december 31 , 2002 , prior to the expiration of the leases to which the additional rent was allocated , we reallocated this rent to other former bradlees leases also guaranteed by stop & shop . stop & shop is contesting our right to reallocate and claims that we are no longer entitled to the additional rent . on november 7 , 2011 , the court determined that we have a continuing right to allocate the annual rent to unexpired leases covered by the master agreement and guaranty and directed entry of a judgment in our favor ordering stop & shop to pay us the unpaid annual rent ( see note 20 2013 commitments and contingencies 2013 litigation ) . as of december 31 , 2011 , we have a $ 41983000 receivable from stop and shop. .

Question: percentage rentals based on tenants 2019 sales totaled how much for the years ended december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , in thousands?
Answer: 16394000
Financial report context:
table of contents the following performance graph is not 201csoliciting material , 201d is not deemed filed with the sec , and is not to be incorporated by reference into any of valero 2019s filings under the securities act of 1933 or the securities exchange act of 1934 , as amended , respectively . this performance graph and the related textual information are based on historical data and are not indicative of future performance . the following line graph compares the cumulative total return 1 on an investment in our common stock against the cumulative total return of the s&p 500 composite index and an index of peer companies ( that we selected ) for the five-year period commencing december 31 , 2007 and ending december 31 , 2012 . our peer group consists of the following ten companies : alon usa energy , inc. ; bp plc ( bp ) ; cvr energy , inc. ; hess corporation ; hollyfrontier corporation ; marathon petroleum corporation ; phillips 66 ( psx ) ; royal dutch shell plc ( rds ) ; tesoro corporation ; and western refining , inc . our peer group previously included chevron corporation ( cvx ) and exxon mobil corporation ( xom ) but they were replaced with bp , psx , and rds . in 2012 , psx became an independent downstream energy company and was added to our peer group . cvx and xom were replaced with bp and rds as they were viewed as having operations that more closely aligned with our core businesses . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return1 among valero energy corporation , the s&p 500 index , old peer group , and new peer group .

Financial table:
12/2007: valero common stock; 12/2008: $ 100.00; 12/2009: $ 31.45; 12/2010: $ 25.09; 12/2011: $ 35.01; 12/2012: $ 32.26; column_7: $ 53.61
12/2007: s&p 500; 12/2008: 100.00; 12/2009: 63.00; 12/2010: 79.67; 12/2011: 91.67; 12/2012: 93.61; column_7: 108.59
12/2007: old peer group; 12/2008: 100.00; 12/2009: 80.98; 12/2010: 76.54; 12/2011: 88.41; 12/2012: 104.33; column_7: 111.11
12/2007: new peer group; 12/2008: 100.00; 12/2009: 66.27; 12/2010: 86.87; 12/2011: 72.84; 12/2012: 74.70; column_7: 76.89

Additional report context:
____________ 1 assumes that an investment in valero common stock and each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2007 . 201ccumulative total return 201d is based on share price appreciation plus reinvestment of dividends from december 31 , 2007 through december 31 , 2012. .

Question: what was the percentage growth of the s&p 500 common stock from 2007 to 2012
Answer: 8.59%