alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
schlumberger limited and subsidiaries shares of common stock ( stated in millions ) issued in treasury shares outstanding .

Financial table:
issued: balance january 1 2010; in treasury: 1334; shares outstanding: -139 ( 139 ); column_4: 1195
issued: acquisition of smith international inc .; in treasury: 100; shares outstanding: 76; column_4: 176
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 6; column_4: 6
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 3; column_4: 3
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -27 ( 27 ); column_4: -27 ( 27 )
issued: issued on conversions of debentures; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 8; column_4: 8
issued: balance december 31 2010; in treasury: 1434; shares outstanding: -73 ( 73 ); column_4: 1361
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 6; column_4: 6
issued: vesting of restricted stock; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 1; column_4: 1
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 3; column_4: 3
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -37 ( 37 ); column_4: -37 ( 37 )
issued: balance december 31 2011; in treasury: 1434; shares outstanding: -100 ( 100 ); column_4: 1334
issued: shares sold to optionees less shares exchanged; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 4; column_4: 4
issued: shares issued under employee stock purchase plan; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: 4; column_4: 4
issued: stock repurchase program; in treasury: 2013; shares outstanding: -14 ( 14 ); column_4: -14 ( 14 )
issued: balance december 31 2012; in treasury: 1434; shares outstanding: -106 ( 106 ); column_4: 1328

Additional report context:
see the notes to consolidated financial statements .

Question: what would the 2012 shares outstanding in millions have been without the acquisition of smith international?
Answer: 1152
Financial report context:
united parcel service , inc . and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures the 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) debentures consist of two separate tranches , as follows : 2022 $ 276 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2030 . these debentures have an 8.375% ( 8.375 % ) interest rate until april 1 , 2020 , and , thereafter , the interest rate will be 7.62% ( 7.62 % ) for the final 10 years . these debentures are redeemable in whole or in part at our option at any time . the redemption price is equal to the greater of 100% ( 100 % ) of the principal amount and accrued interest , or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payout of principal and interest thereon discounted to the date of redemption ( at a benchmark treasury yield plus five basis points ) plus accrued interest . 2022 $ 424 million of the debentures have a maturity of april 1 , 2020 . these debentures are not subject to redemption prior to maturity . interest is payable semiannually in april and october for both tranches and neither tranche is subject to sinking fund requirements . we subsequently entered into interest rate swaps on the 2020 debentures , which effectively converted the fixed interest rates on the debentures to variable libor-based interest rates . the average interest rate payable on the 2020 debentures , including the impact of the interest rate swaps , for 2016 and 2015 was 5.43% ( 5.43 % ) and 5.04% ( 5.04 % ) , respectively . floating rate senior notes the floating rate senior notes bear interest at either one or three-month libor , less a spread ranging from 30 to 45 basis points . the average interest rate for 2016 and 2015 was 0.21% ( 0.21 % ) and 0.01% ( 0.01 % ) , respectively . these notes are callable at various times after 30 years at a stated percentage of par value , and putable by the note holders at various times after 10 years at a stated percentage of par value . the notes have maturities ranging from 2049 through 2066 . in march , june and august 2016 , we issued floating rate senior notes in principal balances of $ 118 , $ 74 and $ 35 million , respectively . these notes bear interest at three-month libor less 30 basis points and mature in 2066 . capital lease obligations we have certain property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases . some of the obligations associated with these capital leases have been legally defeased . the recorded value of our property , plant and equipment subject to capital leases is as follows as of december 31 ( in millions ) : .

Financial table:
2016: vehicles; 2015: $ 68; column_3: $ 74
2016: aircraft; 2015: 2291; column_3: 2289
2016: buildings; 2015: 190; column_3: 207
2016: accumulated amortization; 2015: -896 ( 896 ); column_3: -849 ( 849 )
2016: property plant and equipment subject to capital leases; 2015: $ 1653; column_3: $ 1721

Additional report context:
these capital lease obligations have principal payments due at various dates from 2017 through 3005. .

Question: what was the change in millions of buildings from 2015 to 2016?
Answer: -17
Financial report context:
supplemental financial information common stock performance the following graph compares the performance of an investment in the firm 2019s common stock from december 26 , 2008 ( the last trading day before the firm 2019s 2009 fiscal year ) through december 31 , 2013 , with the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index . the graph assumes $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . the goldman sachs group , inc . s&p 500 index s&p 500 financials index dec-09 dec-10 dec-11 dec-12 dec-13dec-08 the table below shows the cumulative total returns in dollars of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index for goldman sachs 2019 last five fiscal year ends , assuming $ 100 was invested on december 26 , 2008 in each of the firm 2019s common stock , the s&p 500 index and the s&p 500 financials index , and the dividends were reinvested on the date of payment without payment of any commissions . the performance shown in the table represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance. .

Financial table:
12/26/08: the goldman sachs group inc .; 12/31/09: $ 100.00; 12/31/10: $ 224.98; 12/31/11: $ 226.19; 12/31/12: $ 123.05; 12/31/13: $ 176.42; column_7: $ 248.36
12/26/08: s&p 500 index; 12/31/09: 100.00; 12/31/10: 130.93; 12/31/11: 150.65; 12/31/12: 153.83; 12/31/13: 178.42; column_7: 236.20
12/26/08: s&p 500 financials index; 12/31/09: 100.00; 12/31/10: 124.38; 12/31/11: 139.47; 12/31/12: 115.67; 12/31/13: 148.92; column_7: 201.92

Additional report context:
218 goldman sachs 2013 annual report .

Question: what is the five year total return on the goldman sachs group inc.?
Answer: 148.36
Financial report context:
the fair value measurements of the borrowings under our credit agreement and receivables facility are classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy since they are determined based upon significant inputs observable in the market , including interest rates on recent financing transactions with similar terms and maturities . we estimated the fair value by calculating the upfront cash payment a market participant would require at december 31 , 2016 to assume these obligations . the fair value of our notes is classified as level 1 within the fair value hierarchy since it is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in an active market . the fair value of our euro notes is determined based upon observable market inputs including quoted market prices in a market that is not active , and therefore is classified as level 2 within the fair value hierarchy . note 12 . commitments and contingencies operating leases we are obligated under noncancelable operating leases for corporate office space , warehouse and distribution facilities , trucks and certain equipment . the future minimum lease commitments under these leases at december 31 , 2016 are as follows ( in thousands ) : years ending december 31: .

Financial table:
2017: 2018; $ 200450: 168926
2017: 2019; $ 200450: 136462
2017: 2020; $ 200450: 110063
2017: 2021; $ 200450: 82494
2017: thereafter; $ 200450: 486199
2017: future minimum lease payments; $ 200450: $ 1184594

Additional report context:
rental expense for operating leases was approximately $ 211.5 million , $ 168.4 million and $ 148.5 million during the years ended december 31 , 2016 , 2015 and 2014 , respectively . we guarantee the residual values of the majority of our truck and equipment operating leases . the residual values decline over the lease terms to a defined percentage of original cost . in the event the lessor does not realize the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be responsible for a portion of the shortfall . similarly , if the lessor realizes more than the residual value when a piece of equipment is sold , we would be paid the amount realized over the residual value . had we terminated all of our operating leases subject to these guarantees at december 31 , 2016 , our portion of the guaranteed residual value would have totaled approximately $ 59.0 million . we have not recorded a liability for the guaranteed residual value of equipment under operating leases as the recovery on disposition of the equipment under the leases is expected to approximate the guaranteed residual value . litigation and related contingencies we have certain contingencies resulting from litigation , claims and other commitments and are subject to a variety of environmental and pollution control laws and regulations incident to the ordinary course of business . we currently expect that the resolution of such contingencies will not materially affect our financial position , results of operations or cash flows. .

Question: what was the percentage change in rental expense for operating leases from 2014 to 2015?
Answer: 13%
Financial report context:
net impairment we recognized $ 16.9 million and $ 14.9 million of net impairment during the years ended december 31 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively , on certain securities in our non-agency cmo portfolio due to continued deterioration in the expected credit performance of the underlying loans in those specific securities . the gross other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ) and the noncredit portion of otti , which was or had been previously recorded through other comprehensive income ( loss ) , are shown in the table below ( dollars in millions ) : year ended december 31 , 2012 2011 .

Financial table:
year ended december 31 2012: other-than-temporary impairment ( 201cotti 201d ); 2011: $ -19.8 ( 19.8 ); column_3: $ -9.2 ( 9.2 )
year ended december 31 2012: less : noncredit portion of otti recognized into ( out of ) other comprehensive income ( loss ) ( before tax ); 2011: 2.9; column_3: -5.7 ( 5.7 )
year ended december 31 2012: net impairment; 2011: $ -16.9 ( 16.9 ); column_3: $ -14.9 ( 14.9 )

Additional report context:
provision for loan losses provision for loan losses decreased 20% ( 20 % ) to $ 354.6 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 compared to 2011 . the decrease in provision for loan losses was driven primarily by improving credit trends , as evidenced by the lower levels of delinquent loans in the one- to four-family and home equity loan portfolios , and loan portfolio run-off . the decrease was partially offset by $ 50 million in charge-offs associated with newly identified bankruptcy filings during the third quarter of 2012 , with approximately 80% ( 80 % ) related to prior years . we utilize third party loan servicers to obtain bankruptcy data on our borrowers and during the third quarter of 2012 , we identified an increase in bankruptcies reported by one specific servicer . in researching this increase , we discovered that the servicer had not been reporting historical bankruptcy data on a timely basis . as a result , we implemented an enhanced procedure around all servicer reporting to corroborate bankruptcy reporting with independent third party data . through this additional process , approximately $ 90 million of loans were identified in which servicers failed to report the bankruptcy filing to us , approximately 90% ( 90 % ) of which were current at the end of the third quarter of 2012 . as a result , these loans were written down to the estimated current value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs , or approximately $ 40 million , during the third quarter of 2012 . these charge-offs resulted in an increase to provision for loan losses of $ 50 million for the year ended december 31 , 2012 . the provision for loan losses has declined four consecutive years , down 78% ( 78 % ) from its peak of $ 1.6 billion for the year ended december 31 , 2008 . we expect provision for loan losses to continue to decline over the long term , although it is subject to variability in any given quarter. .

Question: what was the change in otti between 2011 and 2012 , in millions?
Answer: 10.6
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following graph compares the most recent five-year performance of the company 2019s common stock with ( 1 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae index and ( 2 ) the standard & poor 2019s 500 ae materials index , a group of 25 companies categorized by standard & poor 2019s as active in the 201cmaterials 201d market sector . the graph assumes , in each case , an initial investment of $ 100 on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends . historical prices prior to the separation of alcoa corporation from the company on november 1 , 2016 , have been adjusted to reflect the value of the separation transaction . the graph , table and related information shall not be deemed to be 201cfiled 201d with the sec , nor shall such information be incorporated by reference into future filings under the securities act of 1933 or securities exchange act of 1934 , each as amended , except to the extent that the company specifically incorporates it by reference into such filing . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor's , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
as of december 31,: arconic inc .; 2012: $ 100; 2013: $ 124.15; 2014: $ 186.02; 2015: $ 117.48; 2016: $ 99.40; 2017: $ 147.47
as of december 31,: s&p 500 aeindex; 2012: 100; 2013: 132.39; 2014: 150.51; 2015: 152.59; 2016: 170.84; 2017: 208.14
as of december 31,: s&p 500 aematerials index; 2012: 100; 2013: 125.60; 2014: 134.28; 2015: 123.03; 2016: 143.56; 2017: 177.79

Additional report context:
s&p 500 ae index 100 132.39 150.51 152.59 170.84 208.14 s&p 500 ae materials index 100 125.60 134.28 123.03 143.56 177.79 .

Question: what is the annualized return for the s&p 500 aematerials index during 2012 and 2017?
Answer: 22.25%
Financial report context:
there were no share repurchases in 2016 . stock performance graph the graph below matches fidelity national information services , inc.'s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the s&p 500 index and the s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services index.aa the graph tracks the performance of a $ 100 investment in our common stock and in each index ( with the reinvestment of all dividends ) from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

Financial table:
12/11: fidelity national information services inc .; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 134.12; 12/14: 210.97; 12/15: 248.68; 12/16: 246.21; column_7: 311.81
12/11: s&p 500; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 116.00; 12/14: 153.58; 12/15: 174.60; 12/16: 177.01; column_7: 198.18
12/11: s&p supercap data processing & outsourced services; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 126.06; 12/14: 194.91; 12/15: 218.05; 12/16: 247.68; column_7: 267.14

Additional report context:
the stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance . item 6 . selected financial ss the selected financial data set forth below constitutes historical financial data of fis and should be read in conjunction with "item 7 , management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations , " and "item 8 , financial statements and supplementary data , " included elsewhere in this report. .

Question: what was the percentage cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock fidelity national information services , inc . for the period ending 12/16?
Answer: 211.81%
Financial report context:
entergy louisiana , inc . management's financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2004 compared to 2003 net income decreased $ 18.7 million primarily due to lower net revenue , partially offset by lower other operation and maintenance expenses . 2003 compared to 2002 net income increased slightly primarily due to higher net revenue and lower interest charges , almost entirely offset by higher other operation and maintenance expenses , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . net revenue 2004 compared to 2003 net revenue , which is entergy louisiana's measure of gross margin , consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related , and purchased power expenses and 2 ) other regulatory credits . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2004 to 2003. .

Financial table:
( in millions ): 2003 net revenue; column_2: $ 973.7
( in millions ): price applied to unbilled sales; column_2: -31.9 ( 31.9 )
( in millions ): deferred fuel cost revisions; column_2: -29.4 ( 29.4 )
( in millions ): rate refund provisions; column_2: -12.2 ( 12.2 )
( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 17.0
( in millions ): summer capacity charges; column_2: 11.8
( in millions ): other; column_2: 2.3
( in millions ): 2004 net revenue; column_2: $ 931.3

Additional report context:
the price applied to the unbilled sales variance is due to a decrease in the fuel price included in unbilled sales in 2004 caused primarily by the effect of nuclear plant outages in 2003 on average fuel costs . the deferred fuel cost revisions variance resulted from a revised unbilled sales pricing estimate made in the first quarter of 2003 to more closely align the fuel component of that pricing with expected recoverable fuel costs . rate refund provisions caused a decrease in net revenue due to additional provisions recorded in 2004 compared to 2003 for potential rate actions and refunds . the volume/weather variance is due to a total increase of 620 gwh in weather-adjusted usage in all sectors , partially offset by the effect of milder weather on billed sales in the residential and commercial sectors . the summer capacity charges variance is due to the amortization in 2003 of deferred capacity charges for the summer of 2001 compared to the absence of the amortization in 2004 . the amortization of these capacity charges began in august 2002 and ended in july 2003. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 2004 for entergy louisiana?
Answer: -4.4%
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 . the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Financial table:
2001 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 60.15: 52.25; low $ 41.30: 39.95; 2000 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 44.72: 49.63; low $ 34.25: 35.56
2001 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 60.15: 44.50; low $ 41.30: 12.00; 2000 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 44.72: 70.25; low $ 34.25: 45.13
2001 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 60.15: 17.80; low $ 41.30: 11.60; 2000 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 44.72: 72.81; low $ 34.25: 45.00

Additional report context:
( b ) holders . as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . ( c ) dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was average of high and low stock prices for the first quarter of 2000?
Answer: 39.49