alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
2016 non-qualified deferred compensation as of december 31 , 2016 , mr . may had a deferred account balance under a frozen defined contribution restoration plan . the amount is deemed invested , as chosen by the participant , in certain t . rowe price investment funds that are also available to the participant under the savings plan . mr . may has elected to receive the deferred account balance after he retires . the defined contribution restoration plan , until it was frozen in 2005 , credited eligible employees 2019 deferral accounts with employer contributions to the extent contributions under the qualified savings plan in which the employee participated were subject to limitations imposed by the code . defined contribution restoration plan executive contributions in registrant contributions in aggregate earnings in 2016 ( 1 ) aggregate withdrawals/ distributions aggregate balance at december 31 , ( a ) ( b ) ( c ) ( d ) ( e ) ( f ) .

Financial table:
name: phillip r . may jr .; executive contributions in 2016 ( b ): $ 2014; registrant contributions in 2016 ( c ): $ 2014; aggregate earnings in 2016 ( 1 ) ( d ): $ 177; aggregate withdrawals/distributions ( e ): $ 2014; aggregate balance at december 31 2016 ( a ) ( f ): $ 1751

Additional report context:
( 1 ) amounts in this column are not included in the summary compensation table . 2016 potential payments upon termination or change in control entergy corporation has plans and other arrangements that provide compensation to a named executive officer if his or her employment terminates under specified conditions , including following a change in control of entergy corporation . in addition , in 2006 entergy corporation entered into a retention agreement with mr . denault that provides possibility of additional service credit under the system executive retirement plan upon certain terminations of employment . there are no plans or agreements that would provide for payments to any of the named executive officers solely upon a change in control . the tables below reflect the amount of compensation each of the named executive officers would have received if his or her employment with their entergy employer had been terminated under various scenarios as of december 31 , 2016 . for purposes of these tables , a stock price of $ 73.47 was used , which was the closing market price on december 30 , 2016 , the last trading day of the year. .

Question: what is the percentage change in the aggregate balance from 2015 to 2016 for phillip r . may jr.?
Answer: 11.2%
Financial report context:
entergy corporation and subsidiaries notes to financial statements ferc audit report , system energy initially recorded as a net regulatory asset the difference between the recovery of the lease payments and the amounts expensed for interest and depreciation and continues to record this difference as a regulatory asset or liability on an ongoing basis , resulting in a zero net balance for the regulatory asset at the end of the lease term . the amount was a net regulatory asset ( liability ) of ( $ 2.0 ) million and $ 60.6 million as of december 31 , 2011 and 2010 , respectively . as of december 31 , 2011 , system energy had future minimum lease payments ( reflecting an implicit rate of 5.13% ( 5.13 % ) ) , which are recorded as long-term debt as follows : amount ( in thousands ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in thousands ): 2012; column_2: $ 49959
amount ( in thousands ): 2013; column_2: 50546
amount ( in thousands ): 2014; column_2: 51637
amount ( in thousands ): 2015; column_2: 52253
amount ( in thousands ): 2016; column_2: -
amount ( in thousands ): years thereafter; column_2: -
amount ( in thousands ): total; column_2: 204395
amount ( in thousands ): less : amount representing interest; column_2: 25611
amount ( in thousands ): present value of net minimum lease payments; column_2: $ 178784

Additional report context:
.

Question: as of december 31 , 2011what was the percent of system energy future minimum lease payments that was due in 2015
Answer: 25.6%
Financial report context:
jpmorgan chase & co./2016 annual report 35 five-year stock performance the following table and graph compare the five-year cumulative total return for jpmorgan chase & co . ( 201cjpmorgan chase 201d or the 201cfirm 201d ) common stock with the cumulative return of the s&p 500 index , the kbw bank index and the s&p financial index . the s&p 500 index is a commonly referenced united states of america ( 201cu.s . 201d ) equity benchmark consisting of leading companies from different economic sectors . the kbw bank index seeks to reflect the performance of banks and thrifts that are publicly traded in the u.s . and is composed of leading national money center and regional banks and thrifts . the s&p financial index is an index of financial companies , all of which are components of the s&p 500 . the firm is a component of all three industry indices . the following table and graph assume simultaneous investments of $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 , in jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices . the comparison assumes that all dividends are reinvested . december 31 , ( in dollars ) 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 .

Financial table:
december 31 ( in dollars ): jpmorgan chase; 2011: $ 100.00; 2012: $ 136.18; 2013: $ 186.17; 2014: $ 204.57; 2015: $ 221.68; 2016: $ 298.31
december 31 ( in dollars ): kbw bank index; 2011: 100.00; 2012: 133.03; 2013: 183.26; 2014: 200.42; 2015: 201.40; 2016: 258.82
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p financial index; 2011: 100.00; 2012: 128.75; 2013: 174.57; 2014: 201.06; 2015: 197.92; 2016: 242.94
december 31 ( in dollars ): s&p 500 index; 2011: 100.00; 2012: 115.99; 2013: 153.55; 2014: 174.55; 2015: 176.95; 2016: 198.10

Additional report context:
december 31 , ( in dollars ) .

Question: based on the review of the simultaneous investments of the jpmorgan chase common stock and in each of the above indices what was the performance ratio of the jpmorgan chase compared to kbw bank index
Answer: 1.15
Financial report context:
stock performance graph the following line-graph presentation compares our cumulative shareholder returns with the standard & poor 2019s information technology index and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index for the past five years . the line graph assumes the investment of $ 100 in our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s information technology index , and the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index on may 31 , 2003 and assumes reinvestment of all dividends . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among global payments inc. , the s&p 500 index and the s&p information technology index 5/03 5/04 5/05 5/06 5/07 5/08 global payments inc . s&p 500 s&p information technology * $ 100 invested on 5/31/03 in stock or index-including reinvestment of dividends . fiscal year ending may 31 . global payments s&p 500 information technology .

Financial table:
global payments: may 31 2003; s&p 500: $ 100.00; s&p information technology: $ 100.00; column_4: $ 100.00
global payments: may 31 2004; s&p 500: 137.75; s&p information technology: 118.33; column_4: 121.98
global payments: may 31 2005; s&p 500: 205.20; s&p information technology: 128.07; column_4: 123.08
global payments: may 31 2006; s&p 500: 276.37; s&p information technology: 139.14; column_4: 123.99
global payments: may 31 2007; s&p 500: 238.04; s&p information technology: 170.85; column_4: 152.54
global payments: may 31 2008; s&p 500: 281.27; s&p information technology: 159.41; column_4: 156.43

Additional report context:
issuer purchases of equity securities in fiscal 2007 , our board of directors approved a share repurchase program that authorized the purchase of up to $ 100 million of global payments 2019 stock in the open market or as otherwise may be determined by us , subject to market conditions , business opportunities , and other factors . under this authorization , we have repurchased 2.3 million shares of our common stock . this authorization has no expiration date and may be suspended or terminated at any time . repurchased shares will be retired but will be available for future issuance. .

Question: what is the roi of global payments from 2004 to 2005?
Answer: 49.0%
Financial report context:
table of contents rent expense under all operating leases , including both cancelable and noncancelable leases , was $ 645 million , $ 488 million and $ 338 million in 2013 , 2012 and 2011 , respectively . future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases having remaining terms in excess of one year as of september 28 , 2013 , are as follows ( in millions ) : other commitments as of september 28 , 2013 , the company had outstanding off-balance sheet third-party manufacturing commitments and component purchase commitments of $ 18.6 billion . in addition to the off-balance sheet commitments mentioned above , the company had outstanding obligations of $ 1.3 billion as of september 28 , 2013 , which consisted mainly of commitments to acquire capital assets , including product tooling and manufacturing process equipment , and commitments related to advertising , research and development , internet and telecommunications services and other obligations . contingencies the company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business and that have not been fully adjudicated . in the opinion of management , there was not at least a reasonable possibility the company may have incurred a material loss , or a material loss in excess of a recorded accrual , with respect to loss contingencies . however , the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain . therefore , although management considers the likelihood of such an outcome to be remote , if one or more of these legal matters were resolved against the company in a reporting period for amounts in excess of management 2019s expectations , the company 2019s consolidated financial statements for that reporting period could be materially adversely affected . apple inc . v . samsung electronics co. , ltd , et al . on august 24 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict awarding the company $ 1.05 billion in its lawsuit against samsung electronics co. , ltd and affiliated parties in the united states district court , northern district of california , san jose division . on march 1 , 2013 , the district court upheld $ 599 million of the jury 2019s award and ordered a new trial as to the remainder . because the award is subject to entry of final judgment , partial re-trial and appeal , the company has not recognized the award in its results of operations . virnetx , inc . v . apple inc . et al . on august 11 , 2010 , virnetx , inc . filed an action against the company alleging that certain of its products infringed on four patents relating to network communications technology . on november 6 , 2012 , a jury returned a verdict against the company , and awarded damages of $ 368 million . the company is challenging the verdict , believes it has valid defenses and has not recorded a loss accrual at this time. .

Financial table:
2014: 2015; $ 610: 613
2014: 2016; $ 610: 587
2014: 2017; $ 610: 551
2014: 2018; $ 610: 505
2014: thereafter; $ 610: 1855
2014: total minimum lease payments; $ 610: $ 4721

Additional report context:
.

Question: what are the total minimum lease payments due in 2014 and 2015 , in millions?
Answer: 1223
Financial report context:
stock performance graph : the graph below shows the cumulative total shareholder return assuming the investment of $ 100 , on december 31 , 2012 , and the reinvestment of dividends thereafter , if any , in the company 2019s common stock versus the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 retail index ( 201cs&p 500 retail index 201d ) and the standard and poor 2019s s&p 500 index ( 201cs&p 500 201d ) . .

Financial table:
company/index: o 2019reilly automotive inc .; december 31 , 2012: $ 100; december 31 , 2013: $ 144; december 31 , 2014: $ 215; december 31 , 2015: $ 283; december 31 , 2016: $ 311; december 31 , 2017: $ 269
company/index: s&p 500 retail index; december 31 , 2012: 100; december 31 , 2013: 144; december 31 , 2014: 158; december 31 , 2015: 197; december 31 , 2016: 206; december 31 , 2017: 265
company/index: s&p 500; december 31 , 2012: $ 100; december 31 , 2013: $ 130; december 31 , 2014: $ 144; december 31 , 2015: $ 143; december 31 , 2016: $ 157; december 31 , 2017: $ 187

Additional report context:
.

Question: what was the difference in the five year total return for o 2019reilly automotive inc . vs the s&p 500 retail index?
Answer: 4
Financial report context:
entergy texas , inc . and subsidiaries management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2017 compared to 2016 net income decreased $ 31.4 million primarily due to lower net revenue , higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and higher taxes other than income taxes . 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 37.9 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , the asset write-off of its receivable associated with the spindletop gas storage facility in 2015 , and higher net revenue . net revenue 2017 compared to 2016 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2017 to 2016 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 644.2
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -35.1 ( 35.1 )
amount ( in millions ): purchased power capacity; column_2: -5.9 ( 5.9 )
amount ( in millions ): transmission revenue; column_2: -5.4 ( 5.4 )
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: 5.6
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 19.0
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: 4.4
amount ( in millions ): 2017 net revenue; column_2: $ 626.8

Additional report context:
the net wholesale revenue variance is primarily due to lower net capacity revenues resulting from the termination of the purchased power agreements between entergy louisiana and entergy texas in august 2016 . the purchased power capacity variance is primarily due to increased expenses due to capacity cost changes for ongoing purchased power capacity contracts . the transmission revenue variance is primarily due to a decrease in the amount of transmission revenues allocated by miso . the reserve equalization variance is due to the absence of reserve equalization expenses in 2017 as a result of entergy texas 2019s exit from the system agreement in august 2016 . see note 2 to the financial statements for a discussion of the system agreement. .

Question: what was the ratio of the change in net revenue to the increase in net income in 2016
Answer: 17
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 . market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market price of and dividends on the registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters market information . our class a common stock is quoted on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol 201cdish . 201d the high and low closing sale prices of our class a common stock during 2014 and 2013 on the nasdaq global select market ( as reported by nasdaq ) are set forth below. .

Financial table:
2014: first quarter; high: $ 62.42; low: $ 54.10
2014: second quarter; high: 65.64; low: 56.23
2014: third quarter; high: 66.71; low: 61.87
2014: fourth quarter; high: 79.41; low: 57.96
2014: 2013; high: high; low: low
2014: first quarter; high: $ 38.02; low: $ 34.19
2014: second quarter; high: 42.52; low: 36.24
2014: third quarter; high: 48.09; low: 41.66
2014: fourth quarter; high: 57.92; low: 45.68

Additional report context:
as of february 13 , 2015 , there were approximately 8208 holders of record of our class a common stock , not including stockholders who beneficially own class a common stock held in nominee or street name . as of february 10 , 2015 , 213247004 of the 238435208 outstanding shares of our class b common stock were beneficially held by charles w . ergen , our chairman , and the remaining 25188204 were held in trusts established by mr . ergen for the benefit of his family . there is currently no trading market for our class b common stock . dividends . on december 28 , 2012 , we paid a cash dividend of $ 1.00 per share , or approximately $ 453 million , on our outstanding class a and class b common stock to stockholders of record at the close of business on december 14 , 2012 . while we currently do not intend to declare additional dividends on our common stock , we may elect to do so from time to time . payment of any future dividends will depend upon our earnings and capital requirements , restrictions in our debt facilities , and other factors the board of directors considers appropriate . we currently intend to retain our earnings , if any , to support future growth and expansion , although we may repurchase shares of our common stock from time to time . see further discussion under 201citem 7 . management 2019s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations 2013 liquidity and capital resources 201d in this annual report on form 10-k . securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans . see 201citem 12 . security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management and related stockholder matters 201d in this annual report on form 10-k. .

Question: what portion of the outstanding shares of our class b common stock were held by the chairman?
Answer: 89.4%
Financial report context:
the table below presents the estimated maximum potential var arising from a one-day loss in fair value for our interest rate , foreign currency , commodity , and equity market-risk-sensitive instruments outstanding as of may 26 , 2019 and may 27 , 2018 , and the average fair value impact during the year ended may 26 , 2019. .

Financial table:
in millions: interest rate instruments; fair value impact may 26 2019: $ 74.4; fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2019: $ 46.1; fair value impact may 27 2018: $ 33.2
in millions: foreign currency instruments; fair value impact may 26 2019: 16.8; fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2019: 19.0; fair value impact may 27 2018: 21.3
in millions: commodity instruments; fair value impact may 26 2019: 4.1; fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2019: 2.5; fair value impact may 27 2018: 1.9
in millions: equity instruments; fair value impact may 26 2019: 2.3; fair value impact averageduringfiscal 2019: 2.2; fair value impact may 27 2018: 2.0

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the change in fair value of foreign currency instruments from 2018 to 2019?
Answer: -4.5
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2010 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

Financial table:
3/31/2010: abiomed inc; 3/31/2011: 100; 3/31/2012: 140.79; 3/31/2013: 215.02; 3/31/2014: 180.91; 3/31/2015: 252.33; column_7: 693.60
3/31/2010: nasdaq composite index; 3/31/2011: 100; 3/31/2012: 115.98; 3/31/2013: 128.93; 3/31/2014: 136.26; 3/31/2015: 175.11; column_7: 204.38
3/31/2010: nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849; 3/31/2011: 100; 3/31/2012: 108.31; 3/31/2013: 115.05; 3/31/2014: 105.56; 3/31/2015: 123.18; column_7: 118.95

Additional report context:
this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Question: did abiomed outperform the nasdaq composite index over the five year period?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph compares the total return , assuming reinvestment of dividends , on an investment in the company , based on performance of the company's common stock , with the total return of the standard & poor's 500 composite stock index and the dow jones united states travel and leisure index for a five year period by measuring the changes in common stock prices from december 31 , 2011 to december 31 , 2016. .

Financial table:
12/11: royal caribbean cruises ltd .; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 139.36; 12/14: 198.03; 12/15: 350.40; 12/16: 437.09; column_7: 362.38
12/11: s&p 500; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 116.00; 12/14: 153.58; 12/15: 174.60; 12/16: 177.01; column_7: 198.18
12/11: dow jones us travel & leisure; 12/12: 100.00; 12/13: 113.33; 12/14: 164.87; 12/15: 191.85; 12/16: 203.17; column_7: 218.56

Additional report context:
the stock performance graph assumes for comparison that the value of the company's common stock and of each index was $ 100 on december 31 , 2011 and that all dividends were reinvested . past performance is not necessarily an indicator of future results. .

Question: what is the percentage increase of the s&p 500 from 2011 to 2016?
Answer: 98.18