alanslzr/finqa-rag huggingface dataset:
Financial report context:
performance graph the following graph compares the yearly change in the cumulative total stockholder return for our last five full fiscal years , based upon the market price of our common stock , with the cumulative total return on a nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and a peer group , the nasdaq medical equipment-sic code 3840-3849 index , which is comprised of medical equipment companies , for that period . the performance graph assumes the investment of $ 100 on march 31 , 2007 in our common stock , the nasdaq composite index ( u.s . companies ) and the peer group index , and the reinvestment of any and all dividends. .

Financial table:
3/31/2007: abiomed inc; 3/31/2008: 100; 3/31/2009: 96.19; 3/31/2010: 35.87; 3/31/2011: 75.55; 3/31/2012: 106.37; column_7: 162.45
3/31/2007: nasdaq composite index; 3/31/2008: 100; 3/31/2009: 94.11; 3/31/2010: 63.12; 3/31/2011: 99.02; 3/31/2012: 114.84; column_7: 127.66
3/31/2007: nasdaq medical equipment sic code 3840-3849; 3/31/2008: 100; 3/31/2009: 82.91; 3/31/2010: 41.56; 3/31/2011: 77.93; 3/31/2012: 94.54; column_7: 74.40

Additional report context:
this graph is not 201csoliciting material 201d under regulation 14a or 14c of the rules promulgated under the securities exchange act of 1934 , is not deemed filed with the securities and exchange commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the securities act of 1933 , as amended , or the exchange act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing . transfer agent american stock transfer & trust company , 59 maiden lane , new york , ny 10038 , is our stock transfer agent. .

Question: did abiomed outperform the nasdaq medical equipment index?
Answer: yes
Financial report context:
shareholder return performance the line graph below compares the annual percentage change in ball corporation fffds cumulative total shareholder return on its common stock with the cumulative total return of the dow jones containers & packaging index and the s&p composite 500 stock index for the five-year period ended december 31 , 2012 . it assumes $ 100 was invested on december 31 , 2007 , and that all dividends were reinvested . the dow jones containers & packaging index total return has been weighted by market capitalization . total return to stockholders ( assumes $ 100 investment on 12/31/07 ) total return analysis .

Financial table:
12/31/2007: ball corporation; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 93.28; 12/31/2010: $ 117.01; 12/31/2011: $ 155.14; 12/31/2012: $ 164.09; column_7: $ 207.62
12/31/2007: dj us containers & packaging; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 61.55; 12/31/2010: $ 84.76; 12/31/2011: $ 97.78; 12/31/2012: $ 96.27; column_7: $ 107.76
12/31/2007: s&p 500; 12/31/2008: $ 100.00; 12/31/2009: $ 61.51; 12/31/2010: $ 75.94; 12/31/2011: $ 85.65; 12/31/2012: $ 85.65; column_7: $ 97.13

Additional report context:
source : bloomberg l.p . aecharts .

Question: what is the roi of an investment in dj us containers & packaging from 2007 to 2012?
Answer: 7.8%
Financial report context:
notes to consolidated financial statements uncertain tax provisions as described in note 1 , the company adopted fin 48 on january 1 , 2007 . the effect of adopting fin 48 was not material to the company 2019s financial statements . the following is a reconciliation of the company 2019s beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits ( in millions ) . .

Financial table:
balance at january 1 2007: additions based on tax positions related to the current year; $ 53: 4
balance at january 1 2007: additions for tax positions of prior years; $ 53: 24
balance at january 1 2007: reductions for tax positions of prior years; $ 53: -6 ( 6 )
balance at january 1 2007: settlements; $ 53: -5 ( 5 )
balance at january 1 2007: balance at december 31 2007; $ 53: $ 70

Additional report context:
of the amount included in the previous table , $ 57 million of unrecognized tax benefits would impact the effective tax rate if recognized . aon does not expect the unrecognized tax positions to change significantly over the next twelve months . the company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized income tax benefits in its provision for income taxes . aon accrued potential penalties and interest of less than $ 1 million related to unrecognized tax positions during 2007 . in total , as of december 31 , 2007 , aon has recorded a liability for penalties and interest of $ 1 million and $ 7 million , respectively . aon and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the u.s . federal jurisdiction as well as various state and international jurisdictions . aon has substantially concluded all u.s . federal income tax matters for years through 2004 . the internal revenue service commenced an examination of aon 2019s federal u.s . income tax returns for 2005 and 2006 in the fourth quarter of 2007 . material u.s . state and local income tax jurisdiction examinations have been concluded for years through 2002 . aon has concluded income tax examinations in its primary international jurisdictions through 2000 . aon corporation .

Question: what is the difference between the additions for tax positions of prior years and the current year , in millions?
Answer: 20
Financial report context:
item 5 . market for the registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities the following graph compares annual total return of our common stock , the standard & poor 2019s 500 composite stock index ( 201cs&p 500 index 201d ) and our peer group ( 201cloews peer group 201d ) for the five years ended december 31 , 2009 . the graph assumes that the value of the investment in our common stock , the s&p 500 index and the loews peer group was $ 100 on december 31 , 2004 and that all dividends were reinvested. .

Financial table:
2004: loews common stock; 2005: 100.00; 2006: 135.92; 2007: 179.47; 2008: 219.01; 2009: 123.70; column_7: 160.62
2004: s&p 500 index; 2005: 100.00; 2006: 104.91; 2007: 121.48; 2008: 128.16; 2009: 80.74; column_7: 102.11
2004: loews peer group ( a ); 2005: 100.00; 2006: 133.59; 2007: 152.24; 2008: 174.46; 2009: 106.30; column_7: 136.35

Additional report context:
( a ) the loews peer group consists of the following companies that are industry competitors of our principal operating subsidiaries : ace limited , w.r . berkley corporation , cabot oil & gas corporation , the chubb corporation , energy transfer partners l.p. , ensco international incorporated , the hartford financial services group , inc. , kinder morgan energy partners , l.p. , noble corporation , range resources corporation , spectra energy corporation ( included from december 14 , 2006 when it began trading ) , transocean , ltd . and the travelers companies , inc . dividend information we have paid quarterly cash dividends on loews common stock in each year since 1967 . regular dividends of $ 0.0625 per share of loews common stock were paid in each calendar quarter of 2009 and 2008 . we paid quarterly cash dividends on the former carolina group stock until the separation . regular dividends of $ 0.455 per share of the former carolina group stock were paid in the first and second quarters of 2008. .

Question: what was the growth rate of the s&p 500 index from december 31 , 2004 to 2007
Answer: 28.16%
Financial report context:
share-based compensation cost is recorded net of estimated forfeitures on a straight-line basis for awards with service conditions only , and on a graded-vesting basis for awards with service , performance and market conditions . the company 2019s estimated forfeiture rate is based on an evaluation of historical , actual and trended forfeiture data . for fiscal 2014 , 2013 , and 2012 , the company recorded share-based compensation cost of $ 172 million , $ 179 million and $ 147 million , respectively , in personnel on its consolidated statements of operations . the amount of capitalized share-based compensation cost was immaterial during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 . options options issued under the eip expire 10 years from the date of grant and vest ratably over 3 years from the date of grant , subject to earlier vesting in full under certain conditions . during fiscal 2014 , 2013 and 2012 , the fair value of each stock option was estimated on the date of grant using a black-scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions: .

Financial table:
2014: expected term ( in years ) ( 1 ); 2013: 4.80; 2012: 6.08; column_4: 6.02
2014: risk-free rate of return ( 2 ); 2013: 1.3% ( 1.3 % ); 2012: 0.8% ( 0.8 % ); column_4: 1.2% ( 1.2 % )
2014: expected volatility ( 3 ); 2013: 25.2% ( 25.2 % ); 2012: 29.3% ( 29.3 % ); column_4: 34.9% ( 34.9 % )
2014: expected dividend yield ( 4 ); 2013: 0.8% ( 0.8 % ); 2012: 0.9% ( 0.9 % ); column_4: 0.9% ( 0.9 % )
2014: fair value per option granted; 2013: $ 44.11; 2012: $ 39.03; column_4: $ 29.65

Additional report context:
( 1 ) beginning in fiscal 2014 , assumption is based on the company 2019s historical option exercises and those of a set of peer companies that management believes is generally comparable to visa . the company 2019s data is weighted based on the number of years between the measurement date and visa 2019s initial public offering as a percentage of the options 2019 contractual term . the relative weighting placed on visa 2019s data and peer data in fiscal 2014 was approximately 58% ( 58 % ) and 42% ( 42 % ) , respectively . in fiscal 2013 and 2012 , assumption was fully based on peer companies 2019 data . ( 2 ) based upon the zero coupon u.s . treasury bond rate over the expected term of the awards . ( 3 ) based on the company 2019s implied and historical volatility . in fiscal 2013 and 2012 , historical volatility was a blend of visa 2019s historical volatility and those of comparable peer companies . the relative weighting between visa historical volatility and the historical volatility of the peer companies was based on the percentage of years visa stock price information is available since its initial public offering compared to the expected term . the expected volatilities ranged from 22% ( 22 % ) to 26% ( 26 % ) in fiscal ( 4 ) based on the company 2019s annual dividend rate on the date of grant. .

Question: what is the percentage increase in the fair value of option granted from 2013 to 2014?
Answer: 13.0%
Financial report context:
the following shares were excluded from the calculation of average shares outstanding 2013 diluted as their effect was anti- dilutive ( shares in millions ) . .

Financial table:
2018: mandatory convertible preferred stock; 2017: n/a; 2016: 39; column_4: 39
2018: convertible notes; 2017: 2014; 2016: 14; column_4: 14
2018: stock options ( 1 ); 2017: 9; 2016: 11; column_4: 13
2018: stock awards; 2017: 2014; 2016: 7; column_4: 8

Additional report context:
( 1 ) the average exercise price of options per share was $ 26.79 , $ 33.32 , and $ 26.93 for 2018 , 2017 , and 2016 , respectively . in 2017 , had arconic generated sufficient net income , 30 million , 14 million , 5 million , and 1 million potential shares of common stock related to the mandatory convertible preferred stock , convertible notes , stock awards , and stock options , respectively , would have been included in diluted average shares outstanding . the mandatory convertible preferred stock converted on october 2 , 2017 ( see note i ) . in 2016 , had arconic generated sufficient net income , 28 million , 10 million , 4 million , and 1 million potential shares of common stock related to the mandatory convertible preferred stock , convertible notes , stock awards , and stock options , respectively , would have been included in diluted average shares outstanding. .

Question: considering the average exercise price of options , what is the increase in the total value of stock options observed during 2016 and 2017 , in millions of dollars?
Answer: 16.43
Financial report context:
part ii item 5 2014market for registrant 2019s common equity and related stockholder matters ( a ) market information . the common stock of the company is currently traded on the new york stock exchange ( nyse ) under the symbol 2018 2018aes 2019 2019 . the following tables set forth the high and low sale prices for the common stock as reported by the nyse for the periods indicated . price range of common stock .

Financial table:
2001 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 60.15: 52.25; low $ 41.30: 39.95; 2000 first quarter: second quarter; high $ 44.72: 49.63; low $ 34.25: 35.56
2001 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 60.15: 44.50; low $ 41.30: 12.00; 2000 first quarter: third quarter; high $ 44.72: 70.25; low $ 34.25: 45.13
2001 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 60.15: 17.80; low $ 41.30: 11.60; 2000 first quarter: fourth quarter; high $ 44.72: 72.81; low $ 34.25: 45.00

Additional report context:
( b ) holders . as of march 2 , 2002 , there were 9967 record holders of the company 2019s common stock , par value $ 0.01 per share . ( c ) dividends . under the terms of the company 2019s corporate revolving loan and letters of credit facility of $ 850 million entered into with a commercial bank syndicate and other bank agreements , the company is currently limited in the amount of cash dividends it is allowed to pay . in addition , the company is precluded from paying cash dividends on its common stock under the terms of a guaranty to the utility customer in connection with the aes thames project in the event certain net worth and liquidity tests of the company are not met . the company has met these tests at all times since making the guaranty . the ability of the company 2019s project subsidiaries to declare and pay cash dividends to the company is subject to certain limitations in the project loans , governmental provisions and other agreements entered into by such project subsidiaries . such limitations permit the payment of cash dividends out of current cash flow for quarterly , semiannual or annual periods only at the end of such periods and only after payment of principal and interest on project loans due at the end of such periods , and in certain cases after providing for debt service reserves. .

Question: what was the difference in the companies high compared to its low sales price for the fourth quarter of 2001?
Answer: 6.20
Financial report context:
devon energy corporation and subsidiaries notes to consolidated financial statements 2013 ( continued ) debt maturities as of december 31 , 2012 , excluding premiums and discounts , are as follows ( in millions ) : .

Financial table:
2013: 2014; $ 3189: 500
2013: 2015; $ 3189: 2014
2013: 2016; $ 3189: 500
2013: 2017; $ 3189: 750
2013: 2018 and thereafter; $ 3189: 6725
2013: total; $ 3189: $ 11664

Additional report context:
credit lines devon has a $ 3.0 billion syndicated , unsecured revolving line of credit ( the 201csenior credit facility 201d ) . the senior credit facility has an initial maturity date of october 24 , 2017 . however , prior to the maturity date , devon has the option to extend the maturity for up to two additional one-year periods , subject to the approval of the lenders . amounts borrowed under the senior credit facility may , at the election of devon , bear interest at various fixed rate options for periods of up to twelve months . such rates are generally less than the prime rate . however , devon may elect to borrow at the prime rate . the senior credit facility currently provides for an annual facility fee of $ 3.8 million that is payable quarterly in arrears . as of december 31 , 2012 , there were no borrowings under the senior credit facility . the senior credit facility contains only one material financial covenant . this covenant requires devon 2019s ratio of total funded debt to total capitalization , as defined in the credit agreement , to be no greater than 65 percent . the credit agreement contains definitions of total funded debt and total capitalization that include adjustments to the respective amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements . also , total capitalization is adjusted to add back noncash financial write-downs such as full cost ceiling impairments or goodwill impairments . as of december 31 , 2012 , devon was in compliance with this covenant with a debt-to- capitalization ratio of 25.4 percent . commercial paper devon has access to $ 5.0 billion of short-term credit under its commercial paper program . commercial paper debt generally has a maturity of between 1 and 90 days , although it can have a maturity of up to 365 days , and bears interest at rates agreed to at the time of the borrowing . the interest rate is generally based on a standard index such as the federal funds rate , libor , or the money market rate as found in the commercial paper market . as of december 31 , 2012 , devon 2019s weighted average borrowing rate on its commercial paper borrowings was 0.37 percent . other debentures and notes following are descriptions of the various other debentures and notes outstanding at december 31 , 2012 , as listed in the table presented at the beginning of this note. .

Question: what percentage of total debt maturity occurred in 2018 and thereafter?
Answer: 57.65
Financial report context:
entergy mississippi , inc . management 2019s financial discussion and analysis results of operations net income 2016 compared to 2015 net income increased $ 16.5 million primarily due to lower other operation and maintenance expenses , higher net revenues , and a lower effective income tax rate , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses . 2015 compared to 2014 net income increased $ 17.9 million primarily due to the write-off in 2014 of the regulatory assets associated with new nuclear generation development costs as a result of a joint stipulation entered into with the mississippi public utilities staff , subsequently approved by the mpsc , partially offset by higher depreciation and amortization expenses , higher taxes other than income taxes , higher other operation and maintenance expenses , and lower net revenue . see note 2 to the financial statements for discussion of the new nuclear generation development costs and the joint stipulation . net revenue 2016 compared to 2015 net revenue consists of operating revenues net of : 1 ) fuel , fuel-related expenses , and gas purchased for resale , 2 ) purchased power expenses , and 3 ) other regulatory charges ( credits ) . following is an analysis of the change in net revenue comparing 2016 to 2015 . amount ( in millions ) .

Financial table:
amount ( in millions ): 2015 net revenue; column_2: $ 696.3
amount ( in millions ): retail electric price; column_2: 12.9
amount ( in millions ): volume/weather; column_2: 4.7
amount ( in millions ): net wholesale revenue; column_2: -2.4 ( 2.4 )
amount ( in millions ): reserve equalization; column_2: -2.8 ( 2.8 )
amount ( in millions ): other; column_2: -3.3 ( 3.3 )
amount ( in millions ): 2016 net revenue; column_2: $ 705.4

Additional report context:
the retail electric price variance is primarily due to a $ 19.4 million net annual increase in revenues , as approved by the mpsc , effective with the first billing cycle of july 2016 , and an increase in revenues collected through the storm damage rider . see note 2 to the financial statements for more discussion on the formula rate plan and the storm damage rider . the volume/weather variance is primarily due to an increase of 153 gwh , or 1% ( 1 % ) , in billed electricity usage , including an increase in industrial usage , partially offset by the effect of less favorable weather on residential and commercial sales . the increase in industrial usage is primarily due to expansion projects in the pulp and paper industry , increased demand for existing customers , primarily in the metals industry , and new customers in the wood products industry. .

Question: what is the growth rate in net revenue in 20016 for entergy mississippi , inc.?
Answer: 1.3%
Financial report context:
10/27/13 10/26/14 10/25/15 10/30/16 10/29/17 10/28/18 applied materials , inc . s&p 500 rdg semiconductor composite part ii item 5 : market for registrant 2019s common equity , related stockholder matters and issuer purchases of equity securities market information applied 2019s common stock is traded on the nasdaq global select market under the symbol amat . as of december 7 , 2018 , there were 2854 registered holders of applied common stock . performance graph the performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total stockholder return on applied common stock during the period from october 27 , 2013 through october 28 , 2018 . this is compared with the cumulative total return of the standard & poor 2019s 500 stock index and the rdg semiconductor composite index over the same period . the comparison assumes $ 100 was invested on october 27 , 2013 in applied common stock and in each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of dividends , if any . dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to the nearest whole dollar . the performance shown in the graph represents past performance and should not be considered an indication of future performance . comparison of 5 year cumulative total return* among applied materials , inc. , the s&p 500 index and the rdg semiconductor composite index *assumes $ 100 invested on 10/27/13 in stock or 10/31/13 in index , including reinvestment of dividends . indexes calculated on month-end basis . copyright a9 2018 standard & poor 2019s , a division of s&p global . all rights reserved. .

Financial table:
10/27/2013: applied materials; 10/26/2014: 100.00; 10/25/2015: 121.04; 10/30/2016: 96.67; 10/29/2017: 171.69; 10/28/2018: 343.16; column_7: 198.27
10/27/2013: s&p 500 index; 10/26/2014: 100.00; 10/25/2015: 117.27; 10/30/2016: 123.37; 10/29/2017: 128.93; 10/28/2018: 159.40; column_7: 171.11
10/27/2013: rdg semiconductor composite index; 10/26/2014: 100.00; 10/25/2015: 128.42; 10/30/2016: 126.26; 10/29/2017: 154.41; 10/28/2018: 232.29; column_7: 221.61

Additional report context:
.

Question: what is the roi for applied materials if the investment made on october 2013 was sold 2 years later?
Answer: -3.3%