alabnii/sciclaimeval-shared-task huggingface dataset:
Styled Table

Table 2
Clinical characteristics of participants in the different test for the wrist extensor muscles.

Measurement test
Side
Assessment 1
Assessment 2

Myoton: ECRB frequency (Hz)
Dominant
15.7 (1.2)
15.7 (1.1)

Non-dominant
15.4 (1.4)
15.3 (1.3)

Asymmetry (%)
1.6 (5.7)
2.4 (6.2)

Myoton: ECRB stiffness (N/m)
Dominant
284 (38)
286 (37)

Non-dominant
278 (38)
275 (36)

Asymmetry (%)
2.0 (10.4)
3.5 (10.5)

Myoton: ECRB decrement (AU)
Dominant
0.96 (0.11)
0.98 (0.12)

Non-dominant
1.00 (0.10)
1.00 (0.12)

Asymmetry (%)
−3.4 (7.7)
−1.6 (9.3)

Nine-Hole Peg test (s)
Dominant
11.3 (0.8)
11.2 (0.8)*

Non-dominant
12.2 (0.9)#

12.1 (1.0)#

Asymmetry (%)
−7.9 (5.1)
−7.0 (6.4)

PPT: ECRB (kPa)
Dominant
164 (55)
169 (64)

Non-dominant
171 (57)
175 (67)

Asymmetry (%)
−3.1 (19.3)
−2.8 (20.9)

PPT: Deltoideus (kPa)
Dominant
191 (58)
184 (55)

Non-dominant
188 (62)
196 (79)

Asymmetry (%)
1.3 (17.4)
−3.6 (16.9)

Active range of motion: total (°)
Dominant
158 (11)
159 (10)

Non-dominant
161 (9)#

161 (10)#

Asymmetry (%)
−1.5 (3.7)
−1.2 (3.0)

Active range of motion: flexion (°)
Dominant
93 (7)
93 (7)

Non-dominant
92 (6)
92 (7)

Asymmetry (%)
1.0 (4.8)
1.1 (3.6)

Active range of motion: extension (°)
Dominant
65 (6)
66 (6)

Non-dominant
69 (6)#

68 (6)#

Asymmetry (%)
−5.1 (5.8)
−4.1 (6.3)

Maximal isometric strength (N)
Dominant
133 (44)
133 (42)

Non-dominant
117 (40)#

119 (40)#

Asymmetry (%)
12.3 (9.8)
10.9 (9.1)

Notes: N = 30. Values are represented as mean (standard deviation). ECRB, extensor carpi radialis brevis; PPT, Pressure Pain Threshold. * Significant differences compared to the values in the Assessment 1 with P < 0.05. # Significant differences compared to the values in the dominant side with P < 0.05.