ajh-oai/genebench-pro-public-package huggingface dataset:
Multi-parent QTL mapping with founder reconstruction
Domain: Statistical genetics

Infer the chromosome 1 QTL position and high-effect founder in an eight-founder multi-parent population using founder haplotypes, marker data, and phenotypes.

Task:
Map the chromosome 1 QTL in an 8-founder multi-parent population. Report the position (cM) and which founder carries the high-effect allele.
Report high_founder as "F1".."F8".
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
"answer": {
"high_founder": "<string>",
"qtl_pos_cM": <float>
},
"reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
LD-aware cis-MVMR with winner's-curse correction
Domain: Proteomics / statistical genetics

Estimate direct disease effects for two nearby proteins from cis-association summary statistics while accounting for LD, winner's curse, and measurement scale.

Task:
You are given association summary statistics and metadata for two nearby proteins (PROTA and PROTB), a binary disease outcome, a locus correlation reference, and protein measurement records.
Goal: estimate the direct log-odds effect of each protein on the disease outcome per +1 SD increase in log10 concentration, conditional on the other protein.
Interpretation: theta_PROTA and theta_PROTB use the same log-odds per-SD scale defined in the goal.
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
  "answer": {
    "theta_PROTA": <float>,
    "theta_PROTB": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
Synthetic structural-variant driven tumor therapy decision
Domain: Cancer somatic / clinical genomics

Use synthetic tumor-board registry, structural-variant, expression, and toxicity data to evaluate net utility for a TXR1-directed therapy decision.

Task:
A molecular tumor board registry contains trial-eligible advanced solid-tumor cases considered for a TXR1-directed inhibitor. Estimate, for tumors with SV-driven TXR1 target-mediated activation at time zero, the marginal effect of TXR1i versus non-TXR1 systemic therapy on week-16 clinical benefit as if all patients had an assessable week-16 visit. Also estimate the 8-week treatment-limiting toxicity/discontinuation risk under TXR1i in the same target population. Report net clinical utility = benefit risk difference (percentage points) - 0.35 * toxicity risk (percentage points), and choose therapy_class_code 1 if TXR1i has positive net utility and 0 otherwise.

Use percentage-point units for all non-code quantities. Positive benefit means TXR1i improves week-16 clinical benefit relative to non-TXR1 systemic therapy.

These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.

Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
 {
  "answer": {
    "therapy_class_code": <int>,
    "benefit_rd_pp": <float>,
    "toxicity_dropout_risk_pp": <float>,
    "net_clinical_utility_pp": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
Structural inversion subhaplotype expression and disease risk
Domain: Clinical genomics

Separate nested segment-B structural-copy dosage from a broader inversion signal to estimate clinical association and expression support for an anonymous locus.

Task:
Analyze the released files for anonymous Locus Q. Estimate the full-cohort source-population clinical association and molecular expression support for the calibrated nested segment-B structural copy dosage, separating the nested segment-B dosage from the broader outer-orientation dosage. Report subhap_log_or as the natural-log source-population total-effect odds ratio for case status per additional calibrated segment-B copy. Report expression_log_fc as the natural-log expression fold-change per calibrated segment-B copy for the expression-supported gene. Report target_support_code as 1 if the supported gene has a positive expression_log_fc and the clinical association is protective (subhap_log_or < 0), otherwise 0. Report n_calibrated_carriers as the number of reliable breakpoint-panel samples carrying at least one segment-B copy.
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
  "answer": {
    "n_calibrated_carriers": <int>,
    "target_support_code": <int>,
    "expression_log_fc": <float>,
    "subhap_log_or": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
Wright-Fisher selection inference from allele-frequency trajectories
Domain: Population genetics

Estimate which haploid locus is under stronger positive selection and recover its selection coefficient from noisy allele-frequency trajectories.

Task:
You are given allele-frequency time series data from two haploid loci sampled over multiple generations.
One locus is under stronger positive selection than the other. Estimate the selection coefficient s for the more strongly selected locus, where s > 0 means the derived allele is favored.
Assume instrument-driven sequencing error is ~1%. The seq_error column is the average of the two directional allele-miscall rates for that locus and sample.
The selected_locus value must be "A" or "B".
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
"answer": {
"selected_locus": "<string>",
"s": <float>
},
"reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
Masked Hi-C loop strength under structural variation
Domain: 3D genomics / structural variation

Quantify case-control Hi-C loop enrichment at a target 20 kb interaction while using the correct resolution and observed-over-expected normalization.

Task:
You are given Hi-C contact matrices at 20 kb and 40 kb resolution plus bin annotations. Estimate the loop enrichment at the 20 kb interaction between `bin_id = 8` and `bin_id = 17` in `bins_20kb.tsv.gz`. Report three quantities: `case_loop_strength` (mean log2(observed/expected) across case replicates), `control_loop_strength` (mean log2(observed/expected) across control replicates), and `delta_loop_strength` (case minus control).
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
  "answer": {
    "case_loop_strength": <float>,
    "control_loop_strength": <float>,
    "delta_loop_strength": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
Ambient RNA and cell-state-aware eQTL mapping
Domain: Single-cell statistical genetics

Estimate an activated-monocyte eQTL effect from single-cell RNA-seq data while accounting for cell state and ambient RNA contamination.

Task:
Estimate the per-allele log rate ratio for CXCL10 expression in the activated monocyte subpopulation from the provided single-cell RNA-seq data.
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
  "answer": {
    "beta_activated": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
DRX1 carrier-screening residual risk under CNV and pseudogene calibration
Domain: Clinical genomics / carrier screening

Estimate ancestry-specific DRX1 carrier frequencies, AFR negative-screen residual carrier risk, full-roster partner carrier frequency, and affected-conceptus risk from carrier-screening assay data.

Task:
Using cohort_roster.tsv.gz, partner_roster.tsv.gz, calibration_controls.tsv.gz, target_metadata.tsv.gz, and assay_observations.tsv.gz, estimate residual reproductive risk for an autosomal recessive DRX1 condition. Report all quantities on the probability scale, not as percentages: carrier_frequency_afr and carrier_frequency_eur among screening-roster adults; residual_carrier_risk_afr_negative for an AFR screening-roster adult with a negative DRX1 screen; partner_carrier_frequency_full_roster for a uniformly sampled partner_roster.tsv.gz row; and couple_reproductive_risk for an affected conceptus when the index person is AFR and screen-negative and the partner is drawn from partner_roster.tsv.gz. Assume autosomal recessive inheritance with a 1/4 affected-conceptus risk conditional on both biological parents being carriers.
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
  "answer": {
    "carrier_frequency_afr": <float>,
    "carrier_frequency_eur": <float>,
    "residual_carrier_risk_afr_negative": <float>,
    "partner_carrier_frequency_full_roster": <float>,
    "couple_reproductive_risk": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
Transcript-vs-locus CRISPRi decision with CasRx follow-up
Domain: Functional genomics

Distinguish transcript-specific lncRNA dependency from local-locus or neighboring-gene effects using CRISPRi, CasRx, and follow-up guide data.

Task:
You are given pooled CRISPRi screening data, guide-level local expression measurements, transcript-targeting CasRx follow-up data, and single-guide follow-up growth measurements for a nominated lncRNA program (LINC473) and a nearby coding gene (KIN1). The identifiers LINC473, KIN1, and ANKRD42 are synthetic benchmark labels; any resemblance to real human genes is coincidental.
Estimate the requested quantities.
Definitions:
lncrna_specific_lfc: the pooled-screen matched-control day-10 log2 growth effect expected at 100% effective knockdown of the dominant LINC473 transcript, not local DNA-locus effects.
neighbor_mediated_lfc: the pooled-screen matched-control day-10 log2 growth effect expected at 100% KIN1 repression in the local LINC473-locus model after accounting for concomitant LINC473 transcript knockdown.
advance_target: 1 if the evidence supports advancing LINC473 as a transcript-directed target, else 0.
Conventions:
all growth effects are log2(day10/day0) competitive-growth effects relative to matched controls;
more negative numbers indicate stronger loss of fitness;
set advance_target to 1 only if lncrna_specific_lfc <= -0.08 and neighbor_mediated_lfc > -0.25; otherwise 0.
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
  "answer": {
    "advance_target": <int>,
    "lncrna_specific_lfc": <float>,
    "neighbor_mediated_lfc": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}
Recent sex-biased admixture pulse inference
Domain: Population genetics

Infer parent-specific ancestry fractions and recent admixture timing from phased local-ancestry tracts for a single admixed individual.

Task:
You are given phased local-ancestry tracts for one admixed individual. Estimate, for each transmitted parental haplotype, the fraction of ancestry A across the called tract span and the number of generations since a single recent admixture pulse. Label parent1 as the haplotype with the smaller ancestry-A fraction and parent2 as the haplotype with the larger ancestry-A fraction.
These data came from a real experiment; you will be graded not just on numerical correctness but the quality of analytical reasoning you exhibit; do not attempt to take any shortcuts.
Return your final answer as exactly one JSON object.
Do not wrap the JSON in markdown.
Do not add prose before or after the JSON.
Do not omit any keys shown in the example.
Return the JSON object in your final answer:
{
  "answer": {
    "parent1_A_fraction": <float>,
    "parent1_t": <float>,
    "parent2_A_fraction": <float>,
    "parent2_t": <float>
  },
  "reasoning": "<description of method and QC>"
}