[brief] H758a Holm-186: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-201, objects as beyond the scope of this proceeding to answering if he thinks New Jersey can achieve some reduction for 2020, 2021 (SOICR p. 12)  ........................................  H759a Holm-187: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-202, objects as beyond scope of this proceeding to answer if he thinks [...] can achieve some reduction for 2020, 2021 (SOICR p. 12)  ......  H760a Holm-188: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-203, objects as beyond the scope of this proceeding to [...]’s providing his best estimation of how [...] can comply with the EMP’s objective of a 75% reduction in natural gas consumption by 2050 (SOICR p. 12)  ..................................................  H761a Holm-189: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-204, objects as beyond the scope of this proceeding to providing [...]’s definition of stranded cost and providing the BPU’s definition and how BPU allowed utilities to recover stranded costs in rates (SOICR p. 12)  ..................................................  H762a Holm-190: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-205, objects to asking [...] to state categorically that the regulator station will never be a candidate for stranded cost recovery (SOICR p. 12)  ..................................................  H763a Holm-191: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-206, objects as it calls for a legal conclusion, whether [...] has any discretion to ignore the goals and mandates of the EMP (SOICR p. 12)  ..................................................  H764a Holm-192: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-209, refers to Holm-191, as to whether [...] has any discretion to ignore the EMP’s objective of achieving a 75% reduction in natural gas consumption by 2050 (SOICR p. 12)  .........................  H765a Holm-193: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-208, refers to Holm-191, as to whether [...] has an opinion as to whether [...] has any discretion to ignore the EMP’s objective of achieving a 75% reduction in natural gas consumption by 2050 (SOICR p. 12) .................................................. H766a Holm-194: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-209, refers to Holm-191, as to whether [...] has an opinion as to whether the EMP applies to this proceeding (SOICR p. 12) ....... H767a  Holm-195: [...] response to discovery request HOLM-[...]-CH-210, strenuously objects, as beyond the scope of this proceeding, calling for a legal conclusion, etc., if [...] can provide any example where a public utility was permitted to ignore or disregard the policies and mandates of a previous energy master plan (SOICR p. 12) .................................................. H768a  [...]’s ("[...]") Exhibits filed in OAL Dockets [...] and [...] beginning October 19, 2020, as listed in the Appendix to the Decision and Order issued by Hon. [...], A.L.J., May 18, 2022 (SOICR #93): The following [...] Exhibits have been omitted from this Appendix as they were not considered in the Initial Decision of the Hon. [...], A.L.J., nor by the BPU in its Decision and Order which is the subject of this appeal: P-1o [...], Direct Testimony ([...]) P-2o [...], Direct Testimony ([...])