[directive] assault, may that defenses justification affirmative concerning the instructions jury grand model developed protection self in of force use N.J.S.A. 2C:3-7, under enforcement law in force (~, of apply use N.J.S.A.  See underN.J.S.A. 2C:3-5).  of protection others in force of use and underN.J.S.A. 2C:3-4, of of use justification defense on the instructed be jury grand the that (explicitly requiring 2B:22-9 general who attorney or deputy assistant or prosecutor assistant  The enforcement.). law in force instructions. model applicable all jury grand the shall to read matter the presents Underlying and Issues Use-of-Force Police Decide to Juries Grand Separate c. Force. Police Precipitated That Activity Criminal have to alleged crime a (~, of force use police the to rise gave that offense underlying The grand different a to presented shall be force) police by injured civilian was who a by committed been unlawful. was force of use police whether the decide will that jury the than grand jury Prosecution. in Resulting Not Investigations of on Results Statement Public 8. where instance the inany investigations, use-of-force conducting in transparency enhance To jury grand a to presented is matter the where or review, its for jury grand a to presented matter not is Prosecutor, County the indictment), an issue to declines (i.e., bill" "no jury a returns grand the and shall Team, Response Shooting General Attorney by the investigated in matters Director the or of the findings specific 1) include: shall statement The dissemination. for public statement a prepare of the findings specific 2) incident, the of circumstances factual concerning the investigation of Code New Jersey the under force of use police the of lawfulness the concerning investigation required inquiry conflicts comprehensive the that explaining statement a Justice, 3) Criminal matter the that explaining statement 4) a and conducted, was Directive this of 3 section to pursuant Attorney the by investigated matters in Director the or Prosecutor, County the by reviewed was Supplemental Directive this of provisions relevant all that Team, and Shooting Response General with. complied been have need the and secrecy jury grand governing rules all with comply shall statement public The information providing from witnesses discouraging prevent to and witnesses of rights the protect to statement's foregoing, the the Notwithstanding cases. future in investigations with cooperating or the why explain to force of use the of circumstances the about detail sufficient include shall findings criminal offense. a as prosecuted being matter not is Page 10 Shooting General Attorney Director the County matters by or Prosecutor, investigated The in his not or General, designee, of to shall statement Attorney Team, a provide Response the the copy Prosecutor County the public, the to dissemination. released than its before Once days public 5 less website. Internet its on available make Criminal statement shall or of Justice the Division Review. for Administrative Referrals 9. where jury or review, the its for grand not a is to matter presented the any where In instance an issue bill" to declines (i.e., jury jury "no grand a returns the and presented grand is matter a to General Attorney the by investigated in Director matters the or Prosecutor, indictment), County the appropriate the to use-of-force incident refer appropriate, the as shall, Team, Shooting Response