[brief] On July 26, 2023, Appellant filed her Complaint and Jury Demand in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Monmouth County Vicinage, against her former employers, Respondents [...] (“[...]”), [...] (“[...]”), [...] (“[...]”), and [...] (“[...]”) (collectively “Respondents”).  (Pa000001).  On October 30, 2023, Respondents Rutgers and Watkins-Keller filed a motion to transfer venue from Monmouth County Vicinage to Middlesex County Vicinage.  (Pa000049).  On November 17, 2023, the Court granted said motion and the within action was transferred to New Jersey Superior Court, Middlesex County Vicinage.  (Pa000051).  On December 11, 2023, [...] filed a motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint and to Compel Arbitration, pursuant to R. 4:6-2.  (Pa000053).  On December 15, 2023, Respondents Rutgers and [...], too, filed a Motion to Dismiss Appellant’s Complaint and to Compel Arbitration.  (Pa000107).  On February 6, 2024, Appellant filed timely Opposition to Respondents’ motion applications.  (Pa000115).  On February 26, 2024, [...] filed their Reply Brief in response to Appellant’s opposition.  (Pa000186).  On the same date, 1 Pa = Appellant [...]’s Appendix before the Appellate Division Respondents Rutgers and Watkins-Keller filed their Reply Brief, joining in the arguments advanced by [...] in support of their motion.  (Pa000197).  On May 24, 2024, and without conducting oral argument, the Court entered an Order granting [...]’s motion, stating, in pertinent part, “Plaintiff’s Complaint and all claims against [...] are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice and the parties are referred to private arbitration in accordance with the Mutual Arbitration Agreement, which is clearly enforceable, and which was signed by the plaintiff on 1/4/22. ” (Pa000204 (emphasis added)).  On June 20, 2024, the Court entered an Order granting Respondents Rutgers and [...]’ motion, stating, in pertinent part, as follows: ORDERED that the Rutgers Defendants’ motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint and compel arbitration pursuant to the parties’ Mutual Arbitration Agreement is hereby GRANTED; and it is further ORDERED that the Plaintiff’s Complaint and all claims against the Rutgers Defendants are hereby DISMISSED without prejudice; and it is further ORDERED that the parties are referred to private arbitration in accordance with the Mutual Arbitration Agreement[.] (Pa000205 (emphasis in original)).  On June 20, 2024, Appellant filed her Notice of Appeal and, as such, now seeks to reverse the Superior Court’s Orders erroneously dismissing Appellant’s Complaint and compelling this matter to arbitration without consideration of her meritorious arguments advanced in Opposition to Respondents’ motions.  On July 2, 2024, after Appellant had already filed her Notice of Appeal, the Court entered an Amended Order to the aforementioned May 24, 2024 Order.  (Pa000207).  The July 2, 2024 Amended Order was identical to the Court’s May 24, 2024, Order except the Amended Order contained the following “statement of reasons”:  This is a LAD, employment case (that does not allege sexual harassment).  The order entered by the court was for a without prejudice dismissal.  During [...]’s onboarding she signed a Mutual Arbitration Agreement (MAA).  Same was dated January 4, 2022.  The MAA is valid on its face.  Plaintiff’s complaint fails to seek any declaratory relief declaring the MAA void or otherwise unenforceable.  See id. (emphasis in original).  III.