[brief] Co., 276 N.J. Super. 112 (Law. Div. 1994)..................................................26  Namm v. Charles E. Frosst & Co., Inc., 178 N.J. Super. 19 (App. Div. 1981)....................................................9  Neveroski v. Blair, 141 N.J. Super.  (App. Div.1976)....................................................... passim Plemmons v. Blue Chip Insurance Services, Inc., 387 N.J. Super. 551 (App. Div. 2006)................................................ passim  Princeton Healthcare Sys. v. Netsmart New York, Inc., 422 N.J. Super. 467 (App. Div. 2011)..................................................12  Quigley v. Esquire Deposition Serv., 400 N.J. Super. 494 (App. Div. 2008)..................................................26  Seidenberg v. Summit Bank, 348 N.J. Super. 243 (App. Div. 2002)..................................................3  Shamrock Lacrosse, Inc. v. Klehr, Harrison, Harvey, Branzburg & Ellers, LLP, 416 N.J. Super. 1 (App. Div. 2010).................................................................26  Shaw v. Shand, 460 N.J. Super. 592 (App. Div. 2019)....................................................... passim State v. Olenowski, 253 N.J. 133 (2023) .................................................................................. 8, 15 State v. Witt, 223 N.J. 409 (2015) ......................................................................................8, 9  Stella v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 241 N.J. Super. 55 (App. Div. 1990).............................................................17  Vort v. Hollander, 257 N.J. Super. 56 (App. Div.), certif. denied, 130 N.J. 599 (1992)  ..........13  Williams-Hopkins v. Medwell, LLC, No. A-0273-21, 2024 N.J. Super. Unpubl. LEXIS 569 (N.J. App. Div. Apr. 5, 2024)...........................................................................19  Statutes & Other Authorities: N.J.A.C. 11:17A-1.1 to 17D-2.8 ........................................................................25  N.J.A.C. 11:17A-2.1 to -2.11 ........................................................................25  N.J.A.C. 11:17A-4.1 ......................................................................................25 N.J.A.C. 11:17A-4.3 ......................................................................................25 N.J.A.C. 11:17A-4.5 ......................................................................................25 N.J.A.C. 11:17A-4.10 ....................................................................................5, 25 N.J.A.C. 11:17B-2.1 ......................................................................................25 N.J.A.C. 11:17B-3.1 to -3.3 ........................................................................25 N.J.A.C. 11:17C-1.1 to -2.6 ........................................................................25 N.J.A.C. 11:17D-1.1 to -2.8 ........................................................................25 N.J.S.A. 17:22A-26 to -48 ..........................................................................25 N.J.S.A. 17:22A-29 ......................................................................................25 PRELIMINARY STATEMENT The trial court was correct to dismiss with prejudice the claims made under the Consumer Fraud Act, N.J.S.A. 56:8-1 et seq. (“CFA”) against Defendants [...] (“Audet”), [...], incorrectly named as [...], Ltd. in the Complaint (“Creative”), and [...] (“Laver”) (collectively, “Defendants”).