[brief] Here the lease language is ambiguous and allows for the alternate interpretation that no personal guaranty was formed due to at least the following:  - There is nothing in any of the numbered paragraphs of the lease that states that a signing of the lease by a member of the LLC tenant, creates a personal guaranty of the lease obligations by the signing member.  For example, paragraph 9 of the lease which is headed “Insurance and Guaranties” includes no language at all as to guaranties.  •  The single sentence relied upon by [...] is tucked away in a “IN WITNESS WHEREOF” clause which comes after all of the substantive paragraphs of the lease are stated and which clause is typically not the place in a document where substantive and important provisions of a lease are placed.  Moreover, the single sentence relied upon appears in regular type and is not bolded, underlined, place in all CAPS or otherwise highlighted.  A lay reader can easily (and apparently did) skip over such language.  •  At the place where the lease is signed, the name of each tenant signor is typed directly below the signature line followed by “- [...]. ”  Importantly, at the place of each signature the word “guaranty” does appear, the word “individually” does not appear and the word “personally’ does not appear.  In short at the place of signature there is absolutely no indication that the signing of the lease as a representative of the LLC would result as a personal guaranty of the obligations of the LLC under the lease.  •  [...], [...] and [...] only signed the lease once, as described above.  There were no separate sets of signatures on the document.  •  The lease was the only document signed by [...], [...] and [...].  There was no separate guaranty document, or even a separate page or even a separate paragraph marked guaranty.  The confusing and “buried’ guaranty language in the Lease is in sharp contrast to the clear and unequivocal language that [...] used to state a personal guaranty in the lease [...] used for the immediately preceding tenant for the Leased Premises (the “Prior Lease”).  DKV003.  The Prior Lease includes a separate page announcing in Block Caps: “INDIVIDUAL PERSONAL GUARANTIES”.  The separate page then includes the following language as a separate paragraph and not buried in a “WITNESS WREREOF” clause:  “The undersigned jointly and severally each hereby personally guaranty the obligations of the Tenant hereunder, including but not limited to the Tenant’s obligations for rent and additional rent. ”  DKVa015.  The Prior Lease then goes on to include a separate set of signature lines to evidence the agreement by the signatories to be personally liable for the obligations under the lease.  Id.  Notably, in the Prior Lease the members of the tenant LLC signed in two places, once to evidence the LLC’s agreement as tenant to be bound by the lease (DKVa014) and a second time on the personal guaranty page to evidence agreement to be personally liable for the obligations of the LLC tenant under the lease DKVa015.  The contrast of the two leases, which are virtually identical in form except for the guaranty language, clearly demonstrates that Plaintiff knew how to draft a clear personal guaranty provision if Plaintiff wanted to but that Plaintiff simply choose not to do so for the Lease in the case at bar.