[brief] Defendant [...] refers to plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal filed on March 20, 2023 (Pa1) and an Amended Notice of Appeal filed on March 23, 2023 (Pa7).  Defendant suggests that both the Notice of Appeal and Amended Notice of Appeal provide that plaintiff was only appealing from the February 10, 2023 Order denying his Motion for Reconsideration and was not appealing from the trial court’s initial Order of January 6, 2023 granting summary judgment in favor of the defendants.  The March 20, 2023 CIS under the heading captioned “Give Date and Summary of Judgment, Order or Decision Being Appealed and Attach a Copy” reads:  Plaintiff-Appellant [...] is appealing the lower court’s February 10, 2023 decision to grant summary judgment and deny reconsideration on liability as to the Defendant-Respondents [...], [...] build, LLC.  (Pa12)  Under the CIS heading captioned “Give a Brief Statement of the Facts and Procedural History,” the plaintiff’s response read:  This matter arises out of a February 20, 2019 construction site accident wherein Plaintiff-Appellant [...] fell while removing debris from the cluttered job site when he slipped and fell and struck his head, awaking surrounded by construction debris.  Following the close of discovery, the defendant-respondents moved for summary judgment on January 6, 2023, relying on [...]'s head injury and his inability to recall the exact details of his fall.  The lower court found this persuasive, finding that no negligence or proximate cause could be attributable to the defendants, despite fact testimony establishing that the defendant-respondents laid out cardboard on the ground on the job site, [...]'s testimony that he came to after the accident on the ground surrounded and on top of construction debris, and photographic evidence taken by [...]'s wife shortly after the accident showing construction debris on the ground in the area of the fall.  [...] subsequently moved for reconsideration, which was denied on February 10, 2023.  (Pa13)  In [...]’s Civil Case Information Statement, filed with the Appellate Division, under the heading “Give a Brief Statement of the Facts and Procedural History,” [...] wrote:  Plaintiff-Appellant [...]’s amended complaint alleged that on February 20, 2019 he fell and sustained personal injuries while working as a floor installation subcontractor at a home in [...] owned by Defendant-Respondent [...] (“[...]”) and where Defendant Respondent [...] Build LLC (“[...]”) was the general contractor.  Wettengel asserted a single claim of negligence against [...] and [...] based on the alleged incident.  On January 6, 2023, the Honorable [...], J.S.C. granted [...]’s motion for summary judgment and dismissed the amended complaint as to [...] with prejudice.  [...] determined that plaintiff had failed to establish an essential element of a negligence claim with competent evidence.  The trial court specifically found that plaintiff was unable to come forward with any non-speculative evidence to demonstrate actual and proximate causation on the part of [...] for Wettengel’s alleged accident.  ([...] also granted [...]’s motion for summary judgment on January 6, 2023.)  Plaintiff moved for reconsideration, which was denied by [...] on February 10, 2023.  Plaintiff’s Notice of Appeal, Amended Notice of Appeal, and CIS filed with the Appellate Division all support plaintiff’s position that he is appealing both the substantive grant of summary judgment to the defendants as well as the denial of his motion for reconsideration.