[brief] This matter involves a three-car motor vehicle accident that occurred at the intersection of State Highway 54 and Jackson Road in Buena Vista Township, Atlantic County, New Jersey.  Da 136-140.  Plaintiff was traveling south on Route 54 and [...] was traveling north on Route 54.  Ibid.  [...] was traveling west on Jackson Road.  Ibid.  [...] entered the intersection against a red traffic light and struck [...]’s vehicle as it moved through the intersection with a yellow light.  Ibid.  The impact with the [...] vehicle pushed the [...] vehicle to the left into oncoming traffic, specifically into Plaintiff’s vehicle, which had not yet reached the intersection.  Ibid.  State Trooper [...] investigated the accident and testified at trial about his observations and how he understood the accident occurred:  Q.  And one final thing.  From your video it appears sir, that the [...] vehicle never made it to the intersection; correct?  A. Correct.  Q.  The impact occurred before the [...] vehicle even got there; correct?  A. Correct.  Q.  And therefore the first collision between the [...] vehicle and the [...] van occurred in the intersection; correct?  A. Correct.  Q.  Okay, and then the [...] van went through the intersection and struck the second time with the [...] vehicle; is that correct?  A. Correct.  No witness disputed this portion of Trooper Morenski’s testimony.  During cross-examination by counsel for [...], Trooper Morenski established the points of impact between the vehicles based on his observations of the vehicles and the photographs taken at the scene of the accident.  Trooper Morenski noted that P-5 depicted the damage to the [...] vehicle, which he described as at the 11:00 position or front-driver-side headlight and bumper.  3T:96-6 to 97-6; Da160.  Trooper Morenski also testified that he prepared a diagram of the accident based on his observations of the damage to each of the three vehicles involved in the accident, which is a standard protocol when investigating an accident.  3T:98-19 to 99-6.  Trooper Morenski testified that the diagram he prepared was a fair and accurate depiction of the points of impact between the three vehicles.  3T:99-17 to 20; Da140.  Counsel for [...] offered the diagram into evidence and counsel for [...] interposed an objection.  3T:99-22 to 101-9.  The trial court sustained the objection and would not allow counsel for [...] to publish Trooper Morenski’s diagram to the jury.  3T:105-8 to 19.  Trooper Morenski was also asked about the sequence of the traffic signal that controlled the intersection of Route 54 and Jackson Road.  Trooper Morenski was generally familiar with the sequencing of the traffic signal.  3T:106-7 to 11.  Based on his knowledge and observation of the traffic signal, he agreed that if there was a yellow light controlling traffic traveling on Route 54, then at that specific moment in time the traffic signal controlling traffic on Jackson Road would have to be red.  3T:108-10 to 14.  This is critical, unrebutted testimony because it establishes that [...] and Plaintiff both saw the same signal when they approached the intersection.  Plaintiff testified about her recollection of the accident.