[directive] for on while release committed was offense present the when complaint-warrant 27 Page the defendant's after police initiated is by process risk-assessment pretrial The automated assessment safety preliminary station. public A a Scan police Live been by at taken have fingerprints complaint-warrant versus complaint-summons the before and prosecutors police to available made is risk- officer, judicial the other or judge a by approved is acomplaint-warrant If made. is decision defendant detained program the is while pretrial services by completed the be will assessmentprocess term "automated the Directive, Section this of Throughout jail. 4 county the at hours for 48 to up by done process risk-assessment pretrial preliminary generally the to refers assessment" risk pretrial is defendant a before police by initiated and AOC administered the by program computer a based modified be may and reviewed be assessment will results jail, the where a to transported county this Throughout See 3. program. note pretrial services the by input information additional on the generally to refers assessment" risk pretrial "automated term the other words, in Section, reviewed case the is prosecutors before and police to provided are that results assessment automated and reviewed assessment pretrial risk the if that (noting Cf. program. 3 note services pretrial the by preliminary computer-generated the from program different is services pretrial the by approved updated the charging, of initial time the at police/prosecutors by initiated assessment pretrial risk pretrial seek to decision inform the be should to used available, when assessment, risk pretrial Directive). this Section of 8 and 7 release to pursuant of revocation or detention of present general the nature the for accounts process risk-assessment pretrial automated The court criminal and case electronically-stored certain and violence) whether involves it (e.g., offense justice adult criminal in the any, if involvement, previous defendant's the documents that history data three provides that (PSA) Assessment Safety Public a produces process automated This system. criminal "new asix-point scale, (FTA) "failure-to-appear" six-point a indicators: risk pretrial pretrial AOC's The "flag."9 (NVCA) activity" criminal violent "new a and scale, (NCA) activity" other case In a words, subsection. one than more under bycomplaint-warrant charge presumption to a invoke will case a under fall also and flag activity criminal new or score violent arisk-assessment on isbased aprovisionthat under fall may expected the that given be is That results. to risk-assessment of the independent criterion a on based is that provision a for release on while committed offense present (e.g., Directive this under prosecutors by used be to criteria independent (e.g., process risk-assessment pretrial automated the in used risk the indicators with overlap will often offense) another text. accompanying and 9 note also pending See charge). a defendant has known grid a generate are scales to six-point used two the "Decision-Making Framework," of AOC's the part As NCA the and matrix the of axis vertical on shown the FTA is value the where Matrix," Making Decision "Pretrial the as level type and the indicates that cell a creates scores of two the intersection The axis. horizontal on the presented is value court. the to recommend will program services pretrial thatthe services intervention/monitoring and conditions ofrelease of level and type determining the in program services pretrial the to helpful approach is matrix the Although PSA, through the identified risks the manage the to recommend to court will it services monitoring and conditions release complaint- apply instead fora or acomplaint-summons issue to whether decision enforcement law of the purposes for under Directive, this Rather, matrix in grid. a values point NCA FTA and the juxtapose to necessary not is it warrant, for apply will a police that presumption trigger a to sufficient be value NCA may high or a value FTA high a either recommend appropriate to opportunity an program services pretrial the provide would then which complaint-warrant, should acomplaint-warrant high, is score NCA the but low is FTA the if score words, other In release. of conditions prosecutor's a guiding (presumptions 7.4.3 and 7.4.2 subsections also See 4.5.1. subsection e..