[brief] I, ¶ 10 | 8, 40 | | U.S. Const. amend. V | 8 | | U.S. Const. amend. VI | 8, 39 | | U.S. Const. amend. XIV | 8, 39 | | OTHER AUTHORITIES | PAGE NOS. | |----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------| | [...] & [...], *The Testimony of Forensic Identification Science: What Expert Witnesses Say & What Factfinders Hear*, 33 *Law & Hum. Behav.* 436 (2009) | 26 | | Department of Justice, *Approved Uniform Language for Testimony and Reports for the Forensic Latent Print Discipline* | 30 | | [...] et al., Nat’l Inst. Just., *Fingerprint Sourcebook*, 6-20, D-3 (2011) | 8 | | [...] et al., *Contextual Information Renders Experts Vulnerable To Making Erroneous Identifications*, 74 *Forensic Sci. Int’l* 74 (2006) | 13 | | [...], *Intuitive Error Rate Estimates for the Forensic Sciences*, 57 *Jurimetrics* 153 (2017) | 24 | | Jonathan J. Koelher and [...], *Fingerprint Error Rate on Close Non-matches*, 66 *J. Forensic Sci.* 129 (2020) | 12 | | [...], Northwestern University Faculty Working Papers, *If the Shoe Fits They Might Acquit: The Value of Forensic Science Testimony* 25 (2011) | 25 | | [...], *The Merits of the Paternalistic Justification for Restrictions on the Admissibility of Expert Evidence*, 33 *Seton Hall L. Rev.* 913 (2003) | 26 | | [...] et al., *The Influence of Close Non-Match Fingerprints Similar in Delta Regions of Whorls on Fingerprint Identification*, 66 *J. Forensic Sci.* 1482 (2020) | 20 | | [...] & [...], *Juror Perceptions of Opposing Expert Forensic Psychologists: Preexisting Attitudes, Confirmation Bias, and Belief Perseverance*, 28 *Psychol. Pub. Pol’y & L.* 213 (2022) | 25 | | TABLE OF AUTHORITIES (Cont’d.) | PAGE NOS. | |--------------------------------|-----------| | **OTHER AUTHORITIES (Cont’d.)** | | | [...] & [...], *The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence*, 61 Vand. L. Rev. 199 (2008) | 10 | | National Research Council, *Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward* 144 (2009) | 10 | | Office of the Inspector General, U.S. Dep’t. of Justice, *A Review of the FBI’s Handling of the [...] Case* 1 (March 2006) | 17 | | Org. of Scientific Area Committees, *Guideline for the Articulation of the Decision-Making Process Leading to an Expert Opinion of Source Identification in Friction Ridge Examinations* (2017) | 30 | | Org. of Scientific Area Committees, *Proposed Standard for Friction Ridge Examination Conclusions* (2018) | 28 | | President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, *An Addendum to PCAST Report on Forensic Science in Criminal Courts* (2017) | 11 | | President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, *Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods* (2016) | 10 | | [...], *More than Zero: Accounting for Error in Latent Fingerprint Identification*, 95 J. Crim. L. & Criminology 985 (2005) | 30 | | [...], et al., *Beyond The Individuality Of Fingerprints: A Measure Of Simulated Computer Latent Print Source Attribution Accuracy*, 7 L. Prob. & Risk 165 (2008) | 20 | | [...] et al., *The Relationship Between Sensitivity, Similar Non-Matches and Database Size in Fingerprint Database Searches*, 13 L. Probability & Risk 151 (2014) | 21 | TRANSCRIPT