[brief] 33  Jewish Ctr. Of Sussex County v. Whale, 86 N.J. 619 (1981) .......................  32  Karl’s Sales & Service, Inc. v. Gimbel Bros., Inc., 249 N.J. Super. 487 (App. Div. 1991), certif. denied, 127 N.J. 548 (1991) .............................. 43,44  Kent Motor Cars Inc. v. Reynolds, 207 N.J. 428 (2011)  .............................  24 Lerner v. City of New Jersey, 2019 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 755 (App. Div. April 2, 2019) ........................................................................  22,47  Lum v. Bank of Am., 361 F.3d 217 (3d Cir. 2004) ....................................  47  Malaker Corp. v. First Jersey National Bank, 163 N.J. Super. 463 (App. Div. 1978) certif. denied, 79 N.J. 488 (1979)  .................................  25 MicroBilt Corp. v. L2C, Inc., 2011 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 2280 (App. Div. Aug. 23, 2011) ......................................................................  14  Mori v. Hartz Mountain Dev. Corp., 193 N.J. Super. 47 (App. Div. 1983) .... 25 N.J. Citizen Action, Inc. v. Cnty. of Bergen, 391 N.J. Super. 596 (App. Div.2007) ......................................................................................  47 RNC Systems, Inc. v. Modern Technology Group, Inc., 861 F. Supp. 2d 436 (D.N.J. 2012) .......................................................... 32,33  Sickles v. Cabot Corp., 379 N.J. Super. 100 (App. Div. 2005) ....................  20 State v. Simon, 161 N.J. 416 (App. Div. 1999) .......................................  22 U.S. Bank Nat’l Ass’n v. Williams, 415 N.J. Super. 358 (App. Div. 2010)  ...  21 Vision Mtge. Corp., Inc. v. Patricia J. Chiapperini, Inc., 307 N.J. Super. 48 (App. Div. 1997) .......................................................  25 Rules R. 4:6-2(e) ................................................................................................. 1,10,11,12,13,29,30,42,46 R. 4:30A ...................................................................................................  24 R. 4:46-2 .........................................................................................................................  46 R. 4:64-5 ..........................................................................................................................  24 R. 4:67-4(a) ....................................................................................................................  24  Treaties  PRESSLER & VERNIERO, Current N.J. Court Rules (Gann)...............................  4  PRELIMINARY STATEMENT  This appeal seeks to reverse the trial court’s well-reasoned dismissal of the Complaint based on the Entire Controversy Doctrine and for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under Rule 4:6-2(e).  The appeal should be denied as it improperly implores this Court to substitute its discretion relating to dismissal of the Complaint under the Entire Controversy Doctrine for that of the trial court, which presided over a prior litigation involving the identical subject matter of this action for 2½ years.  This appeal also improperly seeks to have this Court review the allegations of the Complaint without regard to the significant legal conclusions based on undisputed facts made by the trial court in that prior action, which the trial court utilized in dismissing the claims in this action for failure to state a claim.  This is the second action filed by [...] and [...] (the “Appellants”) arising out of their dispute with [...] and [...] (the “CEP Parties”), regarding a lease for real property owned by Respondent, [...] (“[...]”), and the associated rights relating to a solar farm development project.