[brief] Appellant waited to report these incidents, because she did not know how to make the complaints and she was concerned about being retaliated against.  Appellant testified that she never was trained on how to make complaints by [...].  See Appx 404 at 58:5-18.  Appellant complained to multiple people about these incidents, including her supervisor [...], his supervisor, [...], another supervisor, [...], and an upper-level manager, [...].  See Appx 393 at 44:5-14; see also Plaintiff’s Answers to Interrogatories at Appx 419, Appx 423, Appx 426.  Appellant made verbal complaints.  See Plaintiff/Appellant’s deposition transcript, Appx 393 at 44:15 to Appx 394 at 45:2.  Appellant testified that she made complaints to one of her supervisors, [...], while she was still a full-time employee.  Id. at 45:7-14.  Appellant testified that she made complaints to her supervisor [...] about medication not being ordered on time for clients, scheduling of appointments for the clients, and clients’ cash on hand not being available.  See Appx 406 at 64:23 to Appx 407 at 65:4.  Appellant testified that it was hard to remember exactly when she had these conversations with [...] because there was “so many times” that she had conversations about “neglect, abuse and different things with [...]. ”  See Appx 408 at 69:17-22.  Appellant testified that she brought up the abuse and neglect regulations to [...] when complaining about the medication issues and issues surrounding clients’ money.  See Appx 412 at 101:1-10.  When discussing the fraternization issue with [...], Appellant mentioned that it was negatively impacting the residents.  See Appx 412 at 101:17 to 25.  Appellant testified that she had specific conversations with Heather about the fraternization, and about [...] holding clients’ money in his possession.  See Appx 409 at 82:14-25.  [...] testified that a consumer’s money is supposed to be stored on a debit card in a specified location in the group home, and it would be a violation for a supervisor to keep the cards on their person and for the consumers not to have access to these cards.  See deposition transcript of [...], Appx 441 at 58:22 to 59:2.  Appellant specifically recalls raising the issue with Heather about her dating relationship with [...].  See Appellant/Plaintiff’s deposition transcript, Appx 410 at 83:19-24.  [...] testified that her and [...] Ferrer were family friends who would see each other outside of the workplace multiple times a month.  See deposition transcript of [...], Appx 438 at 54:25 to Appx 439 at 55:23.  [...] testified that even though [...] Ferrer was her subordinate, she never disclosed to anyone at [...] that he was a family friend.  See Appx 440 at 57:12-17.  [...] testified that if a subordinate is a close family friend, that should be disclosed.  See deposition transcript of [...], Appx 450 at 36:4-20.  In November of 2019, Appellant’s complaints led to a UIR being filed with the Division of Developmental Disabilities regarding a missed medical appointment for a consumer.  See November 2019 DDD Incident Report, Appx 453-Appx 465.  Appellant further blew the whistle on January 8, 2020, when she informed [...] about an issue involving the mishandling of medication.  See text messages from Appellant to [...], at Appx 467 to Appx 474, which resulted in an incident report being filed at [...].  See Appx 453 to Appx 465, DDD Incident Report regarding the same incident.  B.