[directive] In case otherwise not case the and is offense disorderly petty or offense, persons disorderly crime, indictable (presumption 4.5 Section or complaint-warrant) charging by (mandatory 4.4 Section under covered 33 Page unless acomplaint-summons issue shall agency enforcement law a bycomplaint-warrant), ofcharging this of 3.2 Section with in accordance consulted general attorney or prosecutor deputy an assistant the authorized by and 3.3.2 subsection to pursuant officer designated supervisory or Directive, a that determines this Directive, of 4 Section under presumptions overcome Prosecutor to County the or victim a of safety the protect necessary to reasonably is acomplaint-warrant for application the or prevent to required, when court in appearance defendant's reasonably the assure to community, further and process, criminal justice the attempting obstruct to or obstructing from defendant as Rule 3:3-1(d) to pursuant acomplaint-warrant for apply lawful to basis there a is that determines by charging of presumption the overcome decision to the that anticipated is It recently amended.13 13 complaint- by charging of presumption the overcome judge to a authorizes amended, recently 3:3-1(d), as Rule that: finds judge the where summons appear; to failed offense has indictable and prior any for summons a with served been defendant has (1) the any of the danger safety to will a pose or self, to dangerous is that defendant believe the reason to (2) is there a on summons; released if community the or person other defendant; the for warrants outstanding more or one are there (3) the to defendant the subject to necessary warrant and is known a not is address or identity defendant's the (4) court; the of jurisdiction criminal process justice the obstruct to attempt or obsU~uct will defendant the that believe to reason is there (5) summons; a on released if or summons; a to response in appear will not defendant the that reason believe is to there (6) program services pretrial the by conditions release pretrial of monitoring the that reason believe to is there (7) specified other witness, victim, any protect to necessary is 2A:162-25 N.J.S.A. pursuantto established community. the or person, heard offenses persons disorderly to apply would which practice, court municipal governing VII rules Part The judge a authorizes amended, recently as Rule Specifically, 7:2-2(e), comparable provisions. include municipal court, in following the considering after bycomplaint-summons ofcharging presumption the overcome to officer judicial other or factors: appear; to failed has and offense indictable prior any f'or summons with a served been has defendant the (1) of danger safety the to a pose will or self to dangerous is defendant the that believe to reason is there (2) summons; a on if released community or the person other any defendant; the for warrants outstanding more or one is there (3) to defendant the subject to necessary is warrant a and known not is address or identity defendants the (4) of court; the jurisdiction the criminal justice the obstruct to attempt or will obstruct defendant the that believe to reason is there (5) 34 Page charge serious when most the will overcome be subsection not in established complaint-summons this high that risk suggesting a circumstances extraordinary offense absent disorderly persons petty a is or when required, in appear court to fail new offense, a would commit if released, defendant, the obstruct justice. to o'r attempt obstruct Complaint- by Charging of Presumption Overcoming for Specifying Reasons 4.3.2