[brief] Claims relating to a cause of action for injury or damage to person or property must be presented no later than 90 days after accrual of the cause of action.  N.J.S.A. 59:8-8.  The claimant is barred from recovering against a public entity or public employee if the claimant failed to file his claim with the public entity within 90 days of accrual of the claim.  Id.  Claims are presented to a local entity when they are delivered or sent by certified mail to the entity.  N.J.S.A. 59:8-10.  Claimants who fail to file notice of his claim within 90 days may apply to the court to be permitted to file such notice at any time within one year after the accrual of the claim provided that the public entity has not been substantially prejudiced thereby.  The application must be supported by affidavits based upon personal knowledge of the affiant showing sufficient reasons constituting extraordinary circumstances for failure to timely file the notice of claim.  Under no circumstances, however, may a suit against a public entity or a public employee arising under this act be filed later than two years from the time of the accrual of the claim.  Here, Plaintiff’s self-described TCA notice was signed May 31, 2019.  The notice states, in question 3(a), “The occurrence or accident which gave rise to the claim: time?” to which Plaintiff answered, “There is no specific time or date, it has been a consistent occurrence, that began approximately on or about 1990. ”  (Pa342).  By her own admission, she does not satisfy either the requisite statute of limitations or her obligations under the TCA.  Plaintiff’s brief, in contrast, says she complained about the water on her property as early as 2004.  (Pb5).  However, in every instance, no matter if the accrual date or the first instance of negligence arose in 1990 or 2004, the claim is more than six years old.  Plaintiff argues the statute of limitations did not begin to run until she knew she had a claim against the Township in 2018 when she had to remove her pool due to drainage issues, her driveway was damaged by one of the Township’s trucks, and her backyard landscaping was destroyed during construction of the new drainage system.  However, Plaintiff has been complaining about her water issues since at least 2004.  Plaintiff does not allege that the work that the Township did in 2018 precipitated her removal of the pool.  Plaintiff certified, “The water issue that caused the pool to lift out of the ground and crack was the decisionmaker behind the pool being removed.  The pool was compromised beyond a regular repair. ” (Pa354).  (emphasis added).  Therefore, the pool damage is outside the statute of limitations.  In contrast, the latter two claims stem from a distinct event in 2018.  Therefore, these claims are valid under the statute of limitations, but fail under the TCA because the notice was sent more than 90 days later.  The TCA notice was signed May 31, 2019, and no affidavit showing sufficient reasons constituting extraordinary circumstances for failure to timely file the notice of claim has been exhibited.  Since there is no dispute as to the time when Plaintiff first acknowledged a water intrusion issue on her Property, summary judgment was appropriate and the Amended Complaint was appropriately dismissed.