[brief] 16  Triffin v. Automatic Data Processing, Inc., 411 N.J.Super. 292, 986 A.2d 8 (2010)  .................................................................................................................................  37  United States v. Throckmorton, 98 U.S. 61, 25 L.Ed. 93, 95 (1878) .........................  40  Universal Oil Products Co. v. Root Ref. Co., 66 S.Ct. 1176, 1179, (1946), 328 U.S. 575, 580, 90 L.Ed 1447 .................................................................................................................. 40 Vort v. Hollander, 257 N.J. Super 56, 61, 607 A.2d 1339 (App. Div. 1992) ............ 18 Warner Co. v. Sutton, 270 N.J.Super. 658, 637 A.2d 960 (1994) ............................... 40 Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14, 87 S.Ct. 1920, 18 L.Ed.2d 1019 (1967) ............. 7 Webb v. Texas, 409 U.S. 95, 93 S.Ct. 351, 34 L.Ed.2d 330 (1972) .............................. 7 OTHER AUTHORITIES Restatement (Second) of Torts §539, p. 85 (1976) .................................................. 38 Restatement, Torts 2d, § 914 ......................................................................................... 28 RULES N.J. Court Rules, Comment R.4:42-9(a)(6) ................................................................. 26 New Jersey Rule of Evidence 703 .................................................................................. 16 R. 2:10-2 ......................................................................................................................... 47 R. 4:42-9 ......................................................................................................................... 26 R.4:58-2(a) ...................................................................................................................... 45 RPC 1.5(d) ....................................................................................................................... 43, 44 RPC 3.3 ............................................................................................................................ 37, 42 RPC 3.3(a)(5) .................................................................................................................. 38 Rule 3.6(A) ....................................................................................................................... 46 Rule 3.6(C) of N.J. Code of Judicial Conduct ............................................................ 46 Rule 4:50-1 ....................................................................................................................... 8 Rule 4:50-1(a) .................................................................................................................. 8, 9, 42 Rule 4:50-1(c) .................................................................................................................. 32, 42 Rule 4:50-1(f) .................................................................................................................. 8, 9, 16, 17, 42 Rule 4:50-3 .................................................................................................................... 32, 41, 42 TABLE OF TRANSCRIPT Transcript of Motion Proceedings June 18, 2018 .............................................1T PRELIMINARY STATEMENT In the history of American Jurisprudence, this case is likely the first instance where an outrageous, astronomic, and excessive attorney fee award of over $1.547 Million Dollars was first awarded to Plaintiff’s attorneys for legal fees, which consisted of attorney fees compounded with attorney fees in a legal malpractice case where the elements of causation and actual damage were never established.