388 involving varying numbers of data points (rotation speeds ) per curve,  for key harmonics a re in Tables A -1  to A-5 These tabulations established the foundation for final criteria to evaluate dataset c urve differences.  Rationale/justification for final selec tion of axial data points used for comparative evaluation of the four  primary  harmonics in local axial force, radial force (2), and radial moment (2) directions is in Appendix B.  The four harmonics , as discussed above, are sufficient for  HST LOS jitter analytical assessments14. 

Table 12.  Master Tracking List f or All HST RWA Acceptance Tests Containing  IV Datasets14  RWA   No. Func. Tests  Completed  IV Tests  Completed  Test Data  Name/Designation  Start  Date Data  Vol. Comments   1001 9 8 1 – First Full Functional   2 – First Full Func (Retest)   3 – Post Vibe  Abbr. Func.   4 – Final Full Functional   5 – Abbreviated Functional   6 – Abbreviated Functional   ---  Mini -Functional   7 – Abbreviated Functional   8 – Final Functional  Test 11/26/84  11/29/84  12/04/84  12/11/84  01/06/85  01/16/85  01/18/85  01/21/85  01/26/85  IV  IV  V  VI  VII  VII  VIII VIII  IX Full IV Set   Full IV Set   Minimal IV  Minimal IV   Partial IV Set   Partial IV Set   No IV Data   Partial IV Set   Full IV Set   1002 4 3 1 – Ambient Functional   2 – Post Vib e Abbr. Func.   3 – Partial Abbr Func.   4 – Final Functional Test  12/04/84  12/07/84  02/8/85   02/13/85  IV  V  V  VI Partial IV Set   Partial IV Set   No IV Data   Full IV Set   1003*  4 3 1 – First Functional   2 – Abbreviated Functional   3 – Partial Abbrev. Func.   4 – Final Full Functional  01/17/85  01/19/85  07/08/85  --- Prel.*   Prel.*   Prel.*   ---* Partial IV Set   Partial IV Set   Partial IV Set   ---*  1004 8 6 1 – First Full Functional   2 – Post Vib e Abbr. Func   3 – Abbreviated Functional   4 – Final Full Functional   5 – Short Functional   6 – Final Abbreviated Func.   7 – Mini Functional Test   8 – Abbreviated Functional  09/15/84 09/21/84  11/18/84  11/23/84  01/05/85  01/08/85  01/18/85  01/21/85  IV  V  VI  VII  VIII  VIII  IX  IX Full IV Set   Full IV Set   Partial IV Set   Full IV Set   No IV Data   Partial IV Set   No IV Data   Partial IV Set   1005 6 4 1 – First Full functional Test   2 – Post Vib e Abbr. Func.   3 – Short Functional Test   4 – Final Functional Test   5 – Short Functional Test   6 – Abbreviated Functional  11/25/84  12/09/84 01/05/85 01/13/85  01/19/85  01/23/85  IV  V  V  VI  VII  VII Partial IV Set   Partial IV Set   No IV Data   Full IV Set   No IV Data   Partial IV Set   *     Data not yet completed and officially  delivered by final compilation/reporting.   **    RWA 1001 prior IV data collected non -compliant and not consistent with final rotor flight configuration.  

General and Specific Findings  Derived  from Detailed Invest igations of Compiled   RWA I V Test Data  

Evaluation of compiled IV data resulted in these findings (ordered roughly from general to more specific):   1) IV datasets generally show expected consistency, and reconfirms the fact that all  flight -accepted RWAs  met specification limits  with no evidence of  systematic test errors or glaring discrepancies.    Rotor Rebalanced     Rotor Changed**   [Jitter Baseline]   [Jitter Baseline]   [Jitter Baseline]   [Jitter Baseline]