extending the Archean impact record. They then use the Archean impact record as input to geodynamic models to test Lowe et al.'s hypothesis that these impacts could have initiated a modern style of plate tectonics. Lowe et al. (2014) were not the first to postulate that the Archean greenstone belts record plate tectonic activity. There are multiple lines of evidence that plate tectonics may have been operating in the Archean, including apparent polar wander curves (O 'Neill et al., 2007), felsic volcanism consistent with melting of a water -rich source, and isotopic systematics similar to modern- day arcs (Hugh Smithies et al., 2018; O'Neill et al., 2018). The absence of clearly identified fold-and-thrust belts, tectonic mélanges, or ophiolites in the Archaean rock record casts doubts on the subduction interpretation (e.g., Stern, 2005; Moyen and van Hunen, 2012). Geodynamic calculations have become an important hypothesis-testing tool when combined with the Precambrian geological record (c.f., van Hunen and Moyen, 2012: O'Neill et al., 2018; Stern and Gerya, 2018). These models are based on basic laws of physics, including the conservation of mass and energy, as well as Newton's second law, sometimes misleadingly described as the conservation of momentum. To reduce the number of variables and create a set of equations that can be solved, a set of constitutive equations are required. For mantle convection, stress and strain rate are related through the viscosity. The viscosity of silicate minerals depends on temperature, pressure, composition, stress, grain size, water content, and history (c.f., King, 2016). Our understanding of viscosity is limited, in part due to the challenge of measuring the viscosity of silicate minerals at high pressures and temperatures, and the reality that the strain-rates achievable in such laboratory measurements must be extrapolated by orders of magnitude to mantle conditions. Geodynamic calculations are built upon solid physical principles; the calculations are limited in so far as our understanding of mantle viscosity is limited, and the appropriateness of the initial and boundary condition choices. Several modes of surface behavior are recognized in geodynamic models. In stagnant-lid convection, the lithosphere is immobile with surface heat flow limited by conduction. In mobile-lid convection, the lithosphere is part of the convecting system, cooling as it advects along the surface, and sinking back into the warmer mantle. All other factors being equal, a stagnant-lid planet will have a hotter mantle than a mobile-lid planet. The transition from stagnant-lid to mobile-lid tectonics in geodynamic modeling has enriched our understanding of plate tectonics on Earth. As the mantle becomes hotter than at present day, many models show that plate-like behavior becomes episodic, with alternating periods of mobile-lid and stagnant-lid behavior (c.f., van Hunen and Moyen, 2012). An implication of these models is that evidence for plate tectonics may appear and disappear in the geological record, and subduction may repeatedly fail (O'Neill et al., 2018). The primary force driving plate tectonics is the negative buoyancy in subducted slabs (Forsyth and Uyeda, 1975). It is unclear what additional processes could produce the large forces necessary to initiate subduction on a pre - plate tectonic planet. To identify and test candidate processes, researchers have modeled the arrival of large plumes under the lithosphere (Gerya et al., 2015), magmatic weakening and volcanic loading (Moore and Webb, 2013; Nakagawa and Tackley, 2014), and bolide impacts (O'Neill et a l., 2017). In many cases, subduction is transient, with the mantle reverting to a stagnant-lid state after a relatively brief time interval. In a previous study, O'Neill et al. (2017) examined the effect of bolide impacts on a Hadean Earth, finding that ∼ the thermal anomalies produced by extremely large impacting bolides (> 700 km in diameter) induce mantle upwellings that are capable of driving transient subduction events. These transient events terminate because the hotter Hadean mantle had a lower viscosity than the present-day mantle, reducing the coupling between the man tle and lithosphere (O'Neill et al., 2007), and the higher temperatures weakened the core of the subducting slab, resulting in necking and breakoff that reduces the slab pull force on the plate (van Hunen and Moyen, 2012). The present O'Neill et al. study (2020) addresses whether the estimated size and frequency of Mesoarchean impacts could have initiated subduction, and whether these events could have developed into a globally connected plate boundary network that continued without interruption to the present. There are several significant differences between the Hadean and Archean environments that will directly impact the geodynamic modeling. The Archean mantle should be cooler than the Hadean mantle (c.f., Christensen, 1985) and there should be smaller, less-frequent bolide impacts in the Archean when compared to the Hadean (Bottke et al. 2012). Thus, it is not possible to rescale the results of O'Neill et al.'s (2017) Hadean Earth study to address impact-induced subduction in the Archean.