You asked a question about inter-faith relations - you are rightly referring to the letter called 'A Common Word' or it was called the 'Letter of the 138' and it followed on a year after the Pope's address in Regensburg. And then the Saudi Initiative was different, the Saudi King came to see the Pope in 2007 and then in 2009 - or perhaps it was 2008 - I think there was a follow-up meeting in Madrid when the Saudi King hosted a meeting with different faith leaders in Madrid. And then you have a separate dialogue again which is with Shia Islam, between Shia Islam and the Vatican. So there are a number of different strands. But the 138 process of 'A Common Word' came to the Vatican, came to the Gregorian University last year, and I think had the third in their series of meetings - the first I think was in Yale, the second was in Cambridge, and the third was in Rome. Now that dialogue continues and it goes on. The Saudi dialogue continues as well as does the Shia dialogue as does the dialogue with Al Hazaar. One of the things that Pope Benedict has said - I don't want to jump the gun on the papal visit but he usually on a papal visit there is an interfaith encounter, but there is a desire on the part of the Vatican in dealing with interfaith that actually there is a discussion of practical issues that affect real people's lives, that shows faith in action, because otherwise the risk is that it seeps into a very narrow theological discussion which doesn't encapsulate the wider public. It's important to have that theological discussion but I think it is also important to try to get agreement on certain ethical and social issues that pertain towards real life. And that's where those discussions are going. With the 138 - I sat in on some of their sessions and they were having quite a rich discussion on some of those points. In relation to state-to- state communications, I'm back to the world of diplomacy. I'll go a little bit further - it's very similar to this question down here which was about a particular relationship, but I will try to say something more general. You're involved in practical diplomacy. One of the most challenging things I find in this job is that you are stretched, you are jumping all over the place because you are following about 32 or 33 countries and it's fine for our Embassy in country X to know who the shadow defence spokesperson is, but you know you're sitting with one person and you don't really know who is the shadow defence person and sometimes I go into a meeting in the Vatican and they start referring to this person's name and you start thinking, 'thank God for Google'! You may hear them talking about a particular radio station in some rural parts where the Catholic Church is active and you're really stretched to know what it's all about. And it brings home to you the grass -roots nature o f this organisation: it touches 17.5% of the world's population. Now that's a huge resource for us and you may find that our embassy in country X has a huge appetite for reporting on that radio station because that might be the only independent radio station in that regime and the regime is trying to close it - but you have this practical limitation that you cannot know that country in the way that the ambassador and diplomats in that country would know it. But yet sometimes you are doing detailed reporting. So, in terms of stretch I would have to say to you that this will probably be the most stretching job that I've ever had to do because you're jumping from one minute to the Middle East, to a very specific issue in the Middle East talking about presidential nominations, you're jumping to the Caribbean about some human rights case and then you're jumping to some ethnic conflict situation. And if you were doing that in the United Nations, the United Nations Security Council, our representation in New York, you can understand it - we are covering all