Therefore, the Manager will have to conduct the school strictly in accordance with the provisions of the Act and orders issued from time to time by the Government and the department. He cannot assume certain powers by himself other than that is conferred by the Act and Rules as Manager of the school. Recognition of such a wide power dehors the express power conferred on the Manager will go clearly against the provisions of the Act, Rules and the object underlining the provisions of the Act and Rules. Such unbridled power if recognized, the Manager can play havoc in the management of the school. Therefore, the contention raised by the counsel for the petitioner Manager that in the absence of a prohibition, the Manager can order shifting of a UPSA as LPSA, cannot be accepted. 18. There cannot be any dispute also that the fourth respondent is working as UPSA in the school, going by the pleadings of the parties. She was appointed as UPSA which is evident from Ext. P1 order of appointment produced in W.P.(C) No. 27985/2010. The approval was granted as Assistant Teacher. Ext. P2 produced therein will show that she had been in the U.P. section from 1998 to 2009, even though the Manager by producing copies of certain attendance registers, contends that in the earlier period she was taking certain classes in L.P Section. Even the documents produced by the Manager leading to the shifting will show that she was working as UPSA. Along with I.A. No. 16960/2010 in W.P.(C) No. 25667/2010, the Manager has produced Ext. P11 which expressly states that "Smt. K.V. Sakunthala (T.C.H.) working in the school as U.P.S.A. is shifted as L.P.S.A. w.e.f. 1.6.09 in the vacancy of Smt. K.V. Devi, retired from service on 31.3.2009." Ext. P12 is stated to be a statement of change of staff, wherein against column 2 showing the designation of the 4th respondent, it is clearly noted as "U.P.S.A.". Therefore, it cannot be the case that she was not in the U.P. Section as U.P.S.A., especially since the Manager has actually shifted her to the L.P. Section. Therefore, no amount of argument can be accepted to show that she was not appointed as U.P.S.A. As evident from the counter affidavit of the first respondent also, during the year 2009-2010 also she was taking classes in the U.P. section. Therefore, the Manager could not have taken the advantage of a vacancy in L.P. section to shift a U.P.S.A. as L.P.S.A. Ext. P14 produced by the Manager cannot also help the contentions of the Manager, since that is not a general order passed by the Government laying down any principle, but on the facts of the said case the Government by way of work arrangement permitted a UPSA to work as LPSA to avoid her retrenchment. That cannot be treated as a relevant document at all. The Manager has also raised a contention that the Deputy Director of Education was not competent to consider the appeal. The appeal was disposed of by the Deputy Director of Education in the light of the direction issued by this Court in the judgment in W.P.(C) No. 16085/2010 produced as Ext. P7 in W.P.(C) No. 27985/2010. Evidently, no contention was raised by the Manager before the Deputy Director of Education challenging his jurisdiction. Therefore, the same cannot be raised for the first time in the writ petition. The Deputy Director of Education is also an appellate authority from the orders of the District Educational Officer under Chapter XIV-A K.E.R. Apart from that, the contention regarding jurisdiction need not deter this Court from accepting its validity for another reason also. If the order of the Deputy Director of Education is set aside, that will result in revival of the order passed by the District Educational Officer, which is illegal and unsustainable. Therefore, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, this Court can refuse to interfere with the order under challenge if it results in resurrection of an illegal order passed by another authority. On that principle also the challenge against Ext. P1 order in W.P.(C) No. 25667/2010 fails. Since the issue raised is one regarding the powers of the Manager to shift a UPSA as