you know, kill, right. I totally get that. But the way he explained it and the way he is now explaining it, he's like, people don't even care whether it was legitimate or not. They're like, You're an idiot. So you know what you're idiot-ness created the Iranian, Iranians to overreact. And as a result, you know, it's, it's like, Listen, haven't you ever done this? I've done this. Don't laugh. I've done this, where I got mad at something. I got mad at something and I swung at it. And I think it was the car. I hit the glass, but the glass didn't shatter. It bounced back and then it hit me the Stick hit me in the forehead.

- 29:01

I didn't laugh. But that's

- 29:03

exactly what this kind of reminds me of. It's like, you know, the Iranians got, you know, wanted to have a retaliation because of the killing of soleimani. So they took a stick and they hit the glass, but it came back and it hit them in the face. And, and unfortunately, 167 people tragically, tragically died. And this is again, this is where I hold him accountable is if he had legitimate Intel. And he took out this guy. Great. He should have explained that the Iranians could have taken a measured response, but he has to add that gut punch at the end like crazy Nancy was not playing with a full deck. He can't just make the statement and fucking stop. Yep, he has to make the statement and then say the extra. The extra is the part that pisses people off. Yeah. So if he does that with Nancy, that's how he I think he handled foreign policy and that I think, where he could have that culpability. So anyway, It's one of the rare times that I am going to agree with someone on the left about that sort of stuff. Because I think that, as a president of the United States, when you are the biggest guy in the room, you have the ability to measure your responses, and you need to be thoughtful of the consequences of someone fighting back that may not have the ability to beat you up. But, you know, if they flail around, they could hurt other people.

- 30:27

And I don't think any of those words can really describe Trump accurately. No, I don't think you would no one would say a sentence like that about Trump. No.

- 30:33

So my, my, that's my thought about that. So you know that, and that brings us to the, that brings us to the other part of the show that I want to go back to and that is, why is he being impeached? Right. Okay. So, first of all, he's impeached on two articles, right? abuse of power, right, which I think I discussed in the last show, which is not even a crime. It's an opinion and then a obstruction of Congress which is a legitimate crime, but I'm not sure that that happened here. Yeah. But then again, you know, now you have two high school factions. Yeah, saying I'm not gonna let you see the articles until you get me what I want and the other guy saying I'm not giving you what you want, you know, but you have to send and I've been watching that the last couple of weeks and it's embarrassing Yeah, that's immediately what I thought it's just embarrassing to watch you know? And of course now Nancy Pelosi is going to send over the articles and and this is what I predicted way back when the senate which is controlled by the republicans are going to look at these articles and say this is bullshit the acquitted move on Yep, so