referred to the Zoning Board Engineer report dated August 4, 2014 that states it is 32.5ft in height. Chairman Coupland stated the plan submitted this evening is 27.5 and explained that the report Mr. McCauley is referring to a previous application before that Board. Mr. McCauley asked for a bread so all the neighbors could look at the revised plans.

Chairman Coupland called for a 5 minute break at 7:40pm and resumed at 7:50pm. Noted for the record there were technical difficulties regarding the recording devise. Secretary Edie Kopsitz was able to resolve and the meeting commenced at 7:53.

Mr. McCauley went on at length with his concerns regarding the non conformities and constant referrals of the Zoning Board Engineer report. Robert Fineberg, Esquire had to interject and inform Mr. McCauley of the Historic Preservations Certificate of Approval by Resolution that will denote if approved the height of the structure at 27.5 ft and he explained the procedure of the Construction Official regarding HPC prior approval. Mary Pat Meyers – 611 Jefferson Street expressed that it is a much more desirable design but her concerns of the height still stands. She passed around photographs that were marked into evidence as O-1 of other cottages on the street as well as structure on Corgie Street (new construction) that she feels towers over the area. Ms. Meyers questioned the fireplace on whether it will be a double sided to be utilized on the porch and if the porch screens will have glass inserts. Mr. McLees responded that the fireplace is one side and there will not be glass inserts on the porch screens. Ron Deluca - 725 Page Street, agreed that the applicant has reduced the mass originally presented but he still has concerns and is negative on the application. He expressed at length what revisions and denotations he feels should be on the plans. Judy Porceco, 911 Page, expressed her concerns regarding safety because of the traffic flow. Pip Campbell, 15 North Street, she referred to the HPC Design Standards and the Chairman comments regarding the Commission charge regarding this application. She stated the Commission must consider the streetscape and terms whether a structure contributes or not contributes to the neighborhood. She believes the house is out of conformity with streetscape and does not comply with the Historic Preservation Commission Design Standards that our adopted into ordinance. Mark Shenfield - 726 Corgie Street, negative on the application but recognized that the applicant has modified his plans several times but he believes it is still out of conformity. He concurred and reiterated Ms. Campbell previous statements. He also feels the HPC applications should be noticed to all in the immediate are that it affects. Ted Endirco, 815 Columbia Avenue, was positive on the application and felt that the applicant no matter what he proposed would have ongoing opposition from the neighbors and felt it was out of control. The public portion was closed at 8:25.

Mr. DeBlasio gave brief testimony regarding building heights in the immediate area submitting for the record a Height Survey by Charles E. Adamson NJ Professional Land Surveyor dated 11th, August 5, 2014 with revision dates of August September 25 and October 20, 2014 and was marked into the record as A-2. Mr. DeBlasio clarified for the record all building heights of structures along Jefferson, Corgie and Pearl Streets.

Motion made by Mr. Carroll that the Commission offer to the Zoning Board of Adjustment and the applicant Conceptual Approval with the understanding that several items discussed this evening regarding materials used and construction will be returning to the Commission for scrunity should the Zoning Board approve of the density and setbacks that are being requested for the property. Seconded by Mr. Connolly and carried 6-1. Those in favor: Mr. Carroll, Mr. Clemans, Mr. Furlin, Mr. Connolly, Mr. Fontaine and Mr. Coupland. Those opposed: Mr. Cogswell. Those abstaining: None.