in agreement with Neighbourhood areas. These monies should be spent by the Parish Council or Town Council not the District Council? Cllr Parfitt felt the Parish Council should outline their case for retention of money and agree when the money should be paid to the Parish Council. The Council discussed how to apply and receive the funds. It was agreed that the Parish Council should receive the money every six months.
6. PLANNING 6.1 It was resolved that “THE YRIPC PLANNING PROCEDURES AS 2nd CIRCULATED SHOULD BE ADOPTED”. Propose: Cllr Hentley, Cllr Perlejewski. Unanimously agreed. 6.2 It was resolved that “YRIPC CAN AGREE PLANNING DECISIONS VIA EMAIL AND THEN REPORT THEM TO THE FULL COUNCIL MEETING.” 2nd Propose: Cllr Hentley, Cllr Perlejewski. Unanimously agreed. 6.2 APPLICATION NO: WD/D/15/001693. PROPOSAL: Outline Application for residential development. LOCATION: LAND SOUTH OF FOLLY FARM, THORNFORD ROAD, YETMINSTER PC Comments: Objection. Submitted 19.9.15 Appeal under section 78 town and country planning act 1990 notice received. 9th Date for representations must be received by June 2016. Date of inquiry to be confirmed. Application No: WD/D/15/001693. Appeal APP/F1230/W/16/3148186 The Parish council wishes to make the following additional objections to this Application 1 SIZE The West Dorset Local Plan 2015 (LP) allows for development in the villages in the future but states that these must be of appropriate scale and with the agreement of the community preferably through Neighbourhood Plans All previous developments in Yetminster have been of 25 – 30 houses or less. This development of nearly 90 houses, if allowed, would increase the housing numbers in the village by nearly 20%. This is out of proportion to the rest of the village. It should also be noted that Yetminster and Ryme PC have embarked with the community on a Neighbourhood Plan. 2 DDB The development is outside the Development Boundary and SUS2 (iii) makes clear the conditions where such development could be allowed. With the exception of affordable housing, this development does not meet any of the SUS2 (iii) criteria 3 EMPLOYMENT/TRAFFIC Yetminster has few employment opportunities; as a result, residents of this development will seek employment probably in Yeovil thus increasing the traffic flow along the narrow road through Ryme Intrinseca or along the Thornford Road through Stofford to unsustainable levels particularly at peak times. A recent traffic census carried out by the Parish Council indicates a weekday volume during the 0700 -1800 period of 1440 cars along the Ryme Road and 2100 along the Thornford Road. This development has the potential to increase the traffic through Ryme by nearly 15%, which is highly undesirable particularly as many houses in Ryme open directly onto the street or onto a narrow pavement. 4 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT The Parish Council fully accepts that there will has to be some development in the villages in the future. To this end it has initiated a Neighbourhood Plan(NP) for the Yetminster and Ryme area. The NP will define the areas which the village considers suitable for future development. Future developments proposed in the NP will be of a suitable	Cllr Hentley