ahmedheakl/docatlas_instruct huggingface dataset:
27

- 65. gr.

#### Yfirtaka eigna og hrávörur.

Verðbréfasjóði er heimilt án takmarkana að yfirtaka eignir til að tryggja fullnustu kröfu. Eignirnar skulu seldar jafnskjótt og það er talið hagkvæmt og eigi síðar en innan níu mánaða frá yfirtöku eignanna. Fjármálaeftirlitinu er heimilt að veita lengri frest sé það í þágu hags- muna hlutdeildarskírteinishafa. Verðbréfasjóði er óheimilt að fjárfesta í hrávörum eða heimildarskírteinum fyrir þeim.

- 66. gr.

#### Áhættustýring og önnur skilyrði vegna afleiðuviðskipta.

Fjárfesti verðbréfasjóður í afleiðum utan skipulegra verðbréfamarkaða skal rekstrarfélagið hafa yfir að ráða óháðu og áreiðanlegu ferli til að verðmeta þær afleiður. Rekstrarfélag skal reglubundið skila Fjármálaeftirlitinu upplýsingum á því formi sem Fjármálaeftirlitið ákveður þar sem fram koma tegundir afleiðna sem fjárfest hefur verið í, undirliggjandi áhættu þeirra, magntakmarkanir og þær aðferðir sem valdar hafa verið til að meta áhættu sem leiðir af afleiðuviðskiptunum í tengslum við hvern verðbréfasjóð sem það rekur. Fjármálaeftirlitið skal gera upplýsingarnar aðgengilegar ESMA og Evrópska kerfis- áhætturáðinu komi fram beiðni þar um vegna eftirlits með kerfisáhættu. Verðbréfasjóði er heimilt að beita fjárfestingaraðferðum sem snúa að framseljanlegum verðbréfum og peningamarkaðsgerningum í þeim tilgangi að ná fram skilvirkri stýringu eigna sjóðsins. Feli fjárfestingaraðferðin í sér afleiðu skulu önnur ákvæði laga þessara sem snúa að notkun afleiðna gilda um afleiðuna. Fjárfestingaraðferðir samkvæmt þessari málsgrein skulu ávallt vera í samræmi við fjárfestingarstefnu og markmið verðbréfasjóðsins. Verðbréfasjóður skal tryggja að heildaráhætta afleiðuviðskipta sjóðsins sé ekki umfram innra virði sjóðsins. Til grundvallar slíku mati skal taka mið af verðmæti undirliggjandi eigna, mótaðilaáhættu, ytri aðstæðum á fjármálamörkuðum og þeim tíma sem það tekur að fullnusta, selja, gera upp eða loka viðkomandi afleiðu. Verðbréfasjóði er heimilt, í samræmi við fjárfestingarstefnu sína, að fjárfesta í afleiðum innan þeirra takmarkana sem kveðið er á um í 67. gr. gegn því að hann tryggi að áhætta vegna undirliggjandi eigna fari ekki samanlagt yfir þær takmarkanir sem kveðið er á um í 67. gr. Þegar framseljanleg verðbréf eða peningamarkaðsgerningar fela í sér afleiðu, skal tekið mið af afleiðunni þegar kröfur samkvæmt þessari grein eru uppfylltar. Ráðherra setur reglugerð um áhættustýringu verðbréfasjóða, svo sem um mat rekstrar- félags á virði afleiða, um efni og verklag við tilkynningarskyldu til Fjármálaeftirlitsins á teg- undum afleiða, undirliggjandi áhættu, magnbundnum takmörkum og aðferðum sem hafa verið valdar til að meta áhættu sem tengist viðskiptum með afleiður og um heildaráhættu verð- bréfasjóðs vegna afleiðna, og einnig um fjárfestingaraðferðir sem heimilt er að nota.

- 67. gr.

#### Hámark fjárfestingar í framseljanlegum verðbréfum, peningamarkaðsgerningum, innlánum og afleiðum.

Verðbréfasjóði er óheimilt að fjárfesta meira en:

- 10% af eignum í framseljanlegum verðbréfum og peningamarkaðsgerningum útgefnum af sama aðila eða
- 20% af eignum í innlánum sömu lánastofnunar.
DESCRIZIONE DEL PROGETTO/INIZIATIVA (max 1 pagina) Caratteristiche, obiettivi, target di riferimento, modalità, eventuali caratteri innovativi e originali del progetto (max 1 pagina) _____
# Job Description: GSW Coordinator

As per GSW's agreement with Westcott Community Center, the position will be a Westcott Community Center employee, managed by GSW. Please send resume and cover letter to directorgsw@greatersyracuseworks.com

Hours: Full-Time 37.5 hours, Non-Exempt staff position. Reports To: To: GSW Board President and Director of Strategic Initiatives

Goals: This position is responsible for coordination of all GSW Programming. The Coordinator must think systematically about workforce development needs in the community, and identify barriers to employment that can be resolved through connections and collaborations.

GSW is contracted to provide professional workforce development and community education services associated with the completion of the CNY Clean Energy Hub program. Consequently, the Coordinator will be responsible for service delivery activities related to the outreach and equitable engagement plan, developing partnerships with clean energy businesses and agencies providing wrap-around services to developing workforce training/educational events as well as career fairs.

## Responsibilities:

The GSW Coordinator will:

- ● Expand GSW's network of workforce related service providers, develop contacts with employers, and assess workforce needs/barriers
- ● Coordinate Leadership, Direct Service, and Board meetings (determine content, identify speakers, develop guiding questions/discussion guides, prepare meeting minutes, send meeting reminders, follow-up on meeting action items, document outcomes of activities, prepare reports)
- ● Support the Director of Strategic Initiatives in preparing a Clean Energy Regional Assessment and Barriers Analysis that includes identifying stakeholders, barriers to workforce development, existing wrap-around services and new services needed, and preparing a resource guide
- ● Manage GSW members, including membership renewals, outreach to new members, service directory of GSW members, event calendar, and actively manage the GSW listservs (Leadership and Direct Service)
- ● Implement the GSW's Outreach and Engagement activities that include outreach and engagement planning, writing Newsletters, social media posts,

1
decision to issue a search warrant. The Court accepts that an appeal against a decision to issue a search warrant is a prima facie effective remedy. The six-month period should be calculated from the date of the appeal decision. All of the applications but one (application no. 58290/08, see below) were lodged with the Court within six months of the appeal decision; they were therefore not belated. 114. In application no. 58290/08 the applicant successfully appealed against the search warrant. He then made a claim for compensation in the civil courts, which was eventually dismissed. The Court finds it appropriate to take the start of the six-month period from the date of the final decision of 25 June 2008 dismissing the applicant ' s claims for non-pecuniary damages for the unlawful search. As he lodged his application within six months of that decision, it was not belated.

#### 4. Judicial review of the manner of conducting the search (Article 125 of the CCrP)

115. The applicants in eight applications (applications nos. 11264/04 (second search), 32324/06, 26067/08, 2397/11 (first applicant), 14244/11, 73629/13, 19667/16 (in respect of the office search) and 36833/16) applied for a judicial review under Article 125 of the CCrP. The Court notes that the scope of a judicial review under that provision was limited to reviewing the manner in which State officials had acted. A judge examining such a complaint was required to establish whether or not the investigating authorities had complied with the applicable legal requirements and whether they had abided by the terms of the judicial authorisation. The review under Article 125 of the CCrP did not touch upon the legal and factual grounds for the underlying judicial authorisation, that is to say, whether there had been relevant and sufficient reasons for granting that judicial authorisation and Avanesyan whether it was compatible with the legal requirements (see , cited Zubkov and Others v. Russia above, §§ 31-33, in respect of searches, and , nos. 29431/05 and 2 others, §§ 95-97, 7 November 2017, in respect of surveillance activities). Even if a judge had detected irregularities in the manner in which the search had been performed, this would not have affected the validity of the underlying judicial authorisation. The Court concludes that a judicial review under Article 125 of the CCrP could not provide relief in respect of complaints about allegedly unlawful judicial decisions authorising investigative measures such as searches or surveillance activities. The Court observes that in one of those eight cases (application 116. no. 14244/11) the applicants complained about the search of the first applicant ' s office and seizure of her electronic devices both in the appeal complaint against the court search warrant and in the complaints about the authorities ' allegedly unlawful actions under Article 125 of the CCrP. The applicants submitted their application to the Court on 5 February 2011,
- Penyisihan Piutang, dan Beban lain-lain.
- Beban diakui pada:
- (1) Saat timbulnya kewajiban, saat timbulnya kewajiban artinya beban diakui pada saat terjadinya peralihan hak dari pihak lain ke pemerintah daerah tanpa diikuti keluarnya kas dari kas umum daerah. Contohnya tagihan rekening telepon dan rekening listrik yang sudah ada tagihannya belum dibayar pemerintah dapat diakui sebagai beban.
- (2) Saat terjadinya konsumsi aset, saat terjadinya konsumsi aset artinya beban diakui pada saat pengeluaran kas kepada pihak lain yang tidak didahului timbulnya kewajiban dan/atau konsumsi aset nonkas dalam kegiatan operasional pemerintah daerah.
- (3) Saat terjadinya penurunan manfaat ekonomi atau potensi jasa, saat terjadinya penurunan manfaat ekonomi atau potensi jasa artinya beban diakui pada saat penurunan nilai aset sehubungan dengan penggunaan aset bersangkutan/berlalunya waktu. Contoh penurunan manfaat ekonomi atau potensi jasa adalah penyusutan atau amortisasi.
- Pada Kebijakan Akuntansi Pemerintah Kota Mojokerto, pengakuan beban pada periode berjalan dilakukan bersamaan dengan pengeluaran kas yaitu pada saat diterbitkannya SP2D belanja, kecuali pengeluaran belanja modal. Sedangkan pengakuan beban pada saat penyusunan laporan keuangan dilakukan penyesuaian.
- Beban dengan mekanisme LS akan diakui berdasarkan terbitnya dokumen Surat Perintah Pencairan Dana (SP2D) LS atau diakui bersamaan dengan pengeluaran kas dan dilakukan penyesuaian pada akhir periode akuntansi. Beban dengan mekanisme UP/GU/TU akan diakui berdasarkan bukti pengeluaran beban telah disahkan oleh Pengguna Anggaran/pada saat Pertanggungjawaban (SPJ) atau diakui bersamaan dengan pengeluaran kas dari bendahara pengeluaran dan dilakukan penyesuaian pada akhir periode akuntansi.
- Pada saat penyusunan laporan keuangan harus dilakukan penyesuaian terhadap pengakuan beban, yaitu:
- (1) Beban Pegawai, diakui timbulnya kewajiban beban pegawai berdasarkan dokumen yang sah, misal daftar gaji, tetapi pada 31 Desember belum dibayar.
- (2) Beban Barang dan Jasa, diakui pada saat timbulnya kewajiban atau peralihan hak dari pihak ketiga yaitu ketika bukti penerimaan barang/jasa atau Berita Acara Serah Terima ditandatangani tetapi pada 31 Desember
Name	Description
11.12 Technology constraints
11.13 Young people being negative about technology
12 Innovation	Where innovation is discussed
12.1 Service redesign or adjustments
12.2 Speed of change
13. Key lessons	The key lessons from COVID-19 and the response of mental health providers
13.1 Appreciating the value of mental health
13.2 Assessing impact on the most vulnerable population
13.3 Being able to take tough and urgent decisions
13.4 Better use of data for patient quality
13.5 Blended or hybrid approach
13.6 Caring for or valuing staff
13.7 Changing entrenched beliefs and assumptions

21/10/2022 Page 8 of 12
番 号 号	番 号 号 号	評価項目	よく できて いる	おおよそ できてい る	あまりで きていな い	全く できていな い	運営推進会議における評価 コメント記入欄	評価の視点・ 評価にあたっての補足
26	  き状況を予め想定し、 その際の対応 方針等について、利用者等と相談・ 共有することができている	○	関係者で協議し、共有されている	✓ ✓ 共有」について、充足度を評価します
［具体的な状況・取組内容］ 利用者、ご家族、医師、看護師との話し合いの場が持た れている
27	 利用者等に適  利用者等に適 切な時期を見計らって、 予後および 死までの経過を丁寧に説明し、 説明 した内容や利用者等の意向等を記 録として残している	○	看取りのパンフレットを活用し説明さ れている	✓ ✓ ら、充足度を評価します 「丁寧に説明し」且つ「記録として残している」場合は「よくできて ✓ いる」
 利用者等に適  利用者等に適 切な時期を見計らって、 予後および 死までの経過を丁寧に説明し、 説明 した内容や利用者等の意向等を記 録として残している	［具体的な状況・取組内容］ 医師（看護師）より説明がされている ご家族、利用者の意向は記録している	れている	看取りのパンフレットを活用し説明さ れている	✓ ✓ ら、充足度を評価します 「丁寧に説明し」且つ「記録として残している」場合は「よくできて ✓ いる」
２．多機関・多職種との連携
（１） 病院・施設等との連携による円滑で切れ目のないケアの提供
① 病院・施設等との連携や情報共有等による、在宅生活への円滑な移行
28	  により、病院・施設等からの、利用 者の円滑な在宅生活への移行を支 援している	○	連携がとれていると思う	✓ ✓ 例えば、退院・退所前のカンファレンスへの参加」「利用者等に係る 「 、 ✓ 病院・施設等との継続した情報共有」などの取組が考えられます
［具体的な状況・取組内容］ 退院前カンファレンスには、看護師又は、ケアマネが 参加し直接本人、家族に面会し状態把握している 後日サマリーで情報共有している
② 入院・入所の可能性がある利用者についての、主治医等との対応方針の共有
番 号 号	評価項目	よく できて いる	おおよそ できてい る	あまりで きていな い	全く できていな い	運営推進会議における評価 コメント記入欄	評価の視点・ 評価にあたっての補足
（２） 利用者等の状況変化への迅速な対応とケアマネジメントの実践
① 継続したアセスメントを通じた、利用者等の状況変化の早期把握と計画への反映
16	  セスメントにより、 利用者等の状況 変化を早期に把握し、 計画への適宜 反映が行われている	○	✓ ✓ 評価します
［具体的な状況・取組内容］ 利用者の状態変化に対し、早急に連携を図り計画変更 している（ケア、食事形態、福祉用具等）
② 居宅への訪問を含む、利用者等の暮らし全体に着目したアセスメントの実施と計画への反映
17	  いよう、 適時適切に利用者宅を訪問 することで、 家族等を含めた居宅で の生活状況の変化を継続的に把握 している	○	利用者・家族の状況や希望に応じてサ ービスの利用を工夫されている	✓ ✓ 握」という視点から、充足度を評価します 訪問によるケアの提供は、家族等を含めた居宅での生活状況を把握す ✓ るためにも重要です
［具体的な状況・取組内容］ 状態把握しご家族とも連携を図っている 訪問介護の機会が少ない
③ 利用者等の状況変化や目標の達成状況等に関する関係多職種との情報共有
18	  状況等について、主治医など、事業 所内外を含む関係多職種と情報が 共有されている	○	連携がスムーズで利用者・家族も安心 できる状況だと考える	✓ ✓ 多職種との情報共有」について、充足度を評価します
［具体的な状況・取組内容］ 工夫しながら情報共有できている（ LINE の活用）
（３）介護職・看護職の協働による一体的なサービスの提供
① 介護職と看護職の相互の専門性を生かした柔軟なサービスの提供
KRUGLOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA JUDGMENT 31

6. 6. that there has been a violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention in respect of eleven applicants (applications nos. 32324/06, 60648/08, 2397/11, 7101/15, 29786/15 and 36833/16); Holds 7. that there is no need to examine Article 13 of the Convention in conjunction with Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention;

#### 8. 8.

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, the amounts indicated in the Appendix, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement, plus any tax that may be chargeable; (b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement, simple interest shall be payable on the awarded amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period, plus three percentage points;

9. 9. the remainder of the applicants ' claims for just satisfaction. Done in English, and notified in writing on 4 February 2020, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court. Stephen Phillips Paul Lemmens Registrar President
Saldo Awal	2022	2021
Konstruksi dalam Pengerjaan	Rp.	1.026.425.054,07	Rp.	1.026.425.054,07
Penambahan
Belanja Modal	Rp.	Rp.
Non Belanja Modal (Pengawasan)	Rp.	Rp.
Belanja BTT Covid-19	Rp.	Rp.
Mutasi dari OPD PUPR	Rp.	Rp.
Lain-lain (DED 2016)	Rp.	Rp.
Jumlah	Rp.	0,00	Rp.	0,00

Pengurangan
Penghapusan	Rp.	Rp.
DED 2013 masuk ke asset tetap	Rp.	Rp.
Mutasi KIB	Rp.	Rp.
Mutasi Ke Sekretariat	Rp.	Rp.
Lain-lain (Lebih catat)	Rp.	Rp.
Koreksi (Penyesuaian)	Rp.	Rp.
Penghapusan RB/Hilang	Rp.	Rp.
Kapitalisasi DED	Rp.	Rp.
Jumlah	Rp.	0,00	Rp.	0,00
Jumlah Total	Rp.	1.026.425.054,07	Rp.	1.026.425.054,07

Penambahan Konstruksi Dalam Pengerjaan Tahun 2022 senilai Rp. 0,00 Pengurangan Konstruksi Dalam Pengerjaan tahun 2022 senilai Rp. 0,00

###### g). Akumulasi Penyusutan Rp. ( 212.952.836.685,55) Rp. ( 184.779.786.553,20)

Merupakan jumlah total dari akumulasi penyusutan baik berupa Alat dan Mesin, Bagunan Gedung, Jalan rigasi dan Jaringannya dan Aset Tetap Lainnya yaitu :

Jenis Aset	Saldo Awal	Penambaha n	Penyesuaian Saldo Awal	Total Penyusutan
Perlatan dan Mesin	(159.804.467.178,20)	(183.726.228.810,95)	(158.780.722.708,60)	(183.709.891.579,95)
Gedung dan Bangunan	(24.854.882.508,00)	(859.564.226,00)	2.350.323.254,00	(28.064.769.988,00)
Jalan,Irigasi dan Jaringan	(120.436.867,00)	(138.093.417,00)	(120.436.867,00)	(138.093.4417,00)
Aset Tetap Lainnya	0,00
Jumlah	(184.779.786.553,20)	(184.723.886.452,95)	(156.550.836.321,60)	(212.952.836.685,55)
Закључна оцена из обавезног предмета за ученика првог разреда је описна и исказује се као напредовање ученика у остваривању исхода, ангажовање и препорука. У првом разреду закључне оцене из обавезних предмета и из изборних програма и активности (пројектна настава) уносе се у ђачку књижицу и ученик прелази у наредни разред. Закључна оцена из обавезног предмета за ученика од другог до осмог разреда је бројчана. Закључна оцена из изборних програма и активности (слободне наставне активности и пројектна настава) је описна и то: истиче се, добар и задовољава и не утиче на општи успех ученика, осим из изборног програма други страни језик који се оцењује бројчано и закључна оцена утиче на општи успех ученика. Ученика од првог до четвртог разреда у току образовно - васпитног рада, оцењује наставник који изводи наставу, а оцену на крају полугодишта утврђује одељењско веће на предлог наставника. Ученика од петог до осмог разреда оцењује предметни наставник у току образовно - васпитног рада, а оцену на крају полугодишта утврђује одељењско веће на предлог предметног наставника. Када предмет садржи модуле, закључна оцена се изводи на основу позитивних оцена свих модула у оквиру предмета. Закључна оцена за успех из обавезног предмета и изборног програма други страни језик не може да буде већа од највеће појединачне оцене уписане у дневник, добијене било којом техником провере знања. Закључна оцена за успех из обавезног предмета и изборног програма други страни језик, не може да буде мања од:

- 1) одличан (5), ако је аритметичка средина свих појединачних оцена најмање 4,50;
- 2) врло добар (4), ако је аритметичка средина свих појединачних оцена од 3,50 до 4,49;
- 3) добар (3), ако је аритметичка средина свих појединачних оцена од 2,50 до 3,49;
- 4) довољан (2), ако је аритметичка средина свих појединачних оцена од 1,50 до 2,49.

Закључна оцена на полугодишту не узима се у обзир приликом утврђивања аритметичке средине из става 10. овог члана, на крају другог полугодишта. Ако одељењско веће не прихвати образложени предлог закључне оцене предметног наставника, нову оцену утврђује одељењско веће гласањем.
Juander Santos DOM 21.17 Kimorie Shaerman VIN 21.21 Fallon Forde BAR 21.25 Stanley del Carmen DOM 21.29 Gary Robinson CRC 21.37 Dwayne Cowan DMA 21.54 Jose Norales HON 22.23 JARED DARIO Jarvis ANT 22.32 STEVEN JOSEPH Larrius HAI Virgilio Griggs PAN Mc Kish Rostannio Shahid VIN Jeffrey Vanan SUR

### 400 mp 2014 2012 2011

Nery Brenes CRC 45.47 45.20 44.65

### Yoandys Lescay CUB 45.54

Freddy Mezones VEN 45.55 Winston George GUY 45.57 Bernardo Baloye COL 45.68 Carlos Lemos COL 45.71

### Raidel Acea CUB 46.03

Alvin Green JAM 46.14 Stephan James GUY 46.15 Gustavo Cuesta DOM 46.18 WESLEY Neymour BAH 46.42 Andrae Willams BAH 46.48 Joel Lynch PAN 46.51 Keegan Campbell JAM 46.53 Jose Melendez VEN 46.57 Warrem Hazell SKN 46.72 Jose Fraire MEX 46.76 LESTROD Roland SKN 46.87 Andrés Rodríguez PAN 47.02 Yon Soriano DOM 47.37 Diego Moreno MEX 47.57 Gary Robinson CRC 47.84 Kemon Henry GRN 48.49 Alie BEAUVAIS HAI Kimorie Shaerman VIN
- 33- Ayrıca, savunma hakkı ve asgari yargısal güvenceler sunulmadan kamu görevinden dönüşü olmayacak şekilde çıkarma, OHAL'in neden olduğu şiddet olaylarının bastırılması ile ilgisi olmayıp hi çbir meşru amaç gütmediği gibi, kamu düzenini yeniden tesis etme ile de ilgisi yoktur. Hiçbir temel sosyal ihtiyaca cevap verme diği gibi , güdülen amaçla da tamamen orantısızdır. OHAL KHK'ları ile OHAL'in gerektirdiği ölçüde (AY m. 15) ve sadece OHAL'in gerektirdiği tedbirler alınabilir (AY m. 121). Buna rağmen, bir kamu konularla sınırlı görevlisinin mesleğinden çıkarılıp bu işlemi bağımsız ve tarafsız bir mahkeme önünde hukuki denetimden dahi geçirememes i hukukun üstünlüğü ilkesine aykırı olup, bu durum müdahaleyi tamamen yasa dışı yapar. B aşvuran eğer bir terör örgütünün üyesi ve bu hususta yeterli kanıt bulunmakta idiyse, olağan kanuni süreç işletilip mesleğinden çıkarılabilir , bu hususta ortaya çıkan uyuşmazlık bir mahkeme tarafından karara bağlanabilirdi. Başvuru formunda belirtildiği gibi, suçlamalara dair hiçbir somut delil yoktur. Sayın Cumhurbaşkanı darbe Kimlerin FETÖ üyesi olduğunu biliyorduk; kanunlar girişiminden hemen sonra, ' bize engel oluyordu ' demiştir. Başvuran bir terör örgütü üyesi olsa ve bu hususta kanıt bulun saydı, kamu görevinden çıkarılması için hiçbir kanun bu duruma engel olmazdı. Terör örgütü üyesi olmak hem ceza kanunu anlamında hem de disiplin huk uku açısından suç olup bu türden bir suçu işleyenler in kamu görevinden çıkarılmasından daha kolay bir idari işlem olamaz. Bu duruma hiçbir kanun hükmü de engel değildir.
- 34- Unutulmamalıdır ki, somut olaydaki uyuşmazlık kamu görevinden çıkarılma hususuyla ilgili değildir. Başvuruya konu uyuşmazlık, hiçbir savunma ha kkı tanınmadan, mahkemeye erişim hakkı engellenerek, masumiyet karinesi ihlal edilerek ve bir daha kamu görevinde çalışamayacak şekilde kamu görevinden çıkarılmaya ilişkindir. Somut olaydaki s orun her türlü hakları yok edilerek, sivil ölüm oluşturur şekilde, idarenin keyfi olarak aldığı anlaşılan bir kararla kamu görevinden çıkarmadır. Kısaca, somut olayda meşru hiçbir amaç da güdülmemiştir.
- 35- B aşvuranın mesleğinden hiçbir mahkemeye başvuramayacak şekilde çıkarılmasına ilişkin olan ve özel hayatı ve aile hayatına açık müdahale oluşturan tedbir, OHAL durumunun kesinlikle gerektirdiği türden bir tedbir olmayıp ölçüsüzdür. Kaldı ki, kamu görevine bir OHAL KHK'sı ile son verilse dahi bu tedbirin (cezanın) süresiz olması ve bahse konu cezanın ömür boyu sürecek
1	2	3	4	5	6
BEBAN
9.1.	BEBAN OPERASI - LO	7.228.614.309,00	6.833.858.752,87	394.755.556,13	5,46
9.1.1.	Beban Pegawai - LO	2.921.511.525,00	2.797.580.308,00	123.931.217,00	4,24
9.1.1.01.	Beban Gaji dan Tunjangan - LO	2.921.511.525,00	2.797.580.308,00	123.931.217,00	4,24
9.1.2.	Beban Barang dan Jasa	4.307.102.784,00	4.036.278.444,87	270.824.339,13	6,29
9.1.2.01.	Beban Bahan Pakai Habis	93.778.162,00	65.518.586,00	28.259.576,00	30,13
9.1.2.02.	Beban Persediaan Bahan/ Material	22.182.850,00	27.926.000,00	(5.743.150,00)	(25,89)
9.1.2.03.	Beban Jasa Kantor	1.198.314.107,00	1.041.517.128,87	156.796.978,13	13,08
9.1.2.05.	Beban Perawatan Kendaraan Bermotor	100.675.641,00	71.046.604,00	29.629.037,00	29,43
9.1.2.06.	Beban Cetak dan Penggandaan	207.213.035,00	194.065.975,00	13.147.060,00	6,34
9.1.2.07.	Beban Sewa Rumah/Gedung/Gudang/ Parkir	3.000.000,00	-	3.000.000,00	100,00
9.1.2.08.	Beban Sewa Sarana Mobilitas	3.000.000,00	-	3.000.000,00	100,00
9.1.2.10.	Beban Sewa Perlengkapan dan Peralatan Kantor	14.400.000,00	14.400.000,00	0,00	0,00
9.1.2.11.	Beban Makanan dan Minuman	731.636.139,00	757.502.136,00	-25.865.997,00	(3,54)
9.1.2.15.	Beban Perjalanan Dinas	274.375.710,00	425.268.859,00	-150.893.149,00	(55,00)
9.1.2.18.	Beban Pemeliharaan	113.980.100,00	219.680.500,00	-105.700.400,00	(92,74)
9.1.2.26.	Honorarium Non PNS	647.770.840,00	523.841.856,00	123.928.984,00	19,13
9.1.2.27.	Uang untuk diberikan kepada Pihak Ketiga/Masyarakat	51.601.200,00	38.500.000,00	13.101.200,00	25,39
9.1.2.40.	B e b a n J a s a T e n a g a Ahli/Instruktur/Narasumbe r/Moderator	753.000.000,00	657.010.800,00	95.989.200,00	12,75
9.1.2.42.	Beban Bantuan Transport dan Akomodasi	92.175.000,00	-	92.175.000,00	100,00
JUMLAH BEBAN	7.228.614.309,00	6.833.858.752,87	394.755.556,13	5,46
SURPLUS/DEFISIT DARI OPERASI	(7.228.614.309,00)	(6.833.858.752,87)	394.755.556,13	5,46

Secara umum, Beban Operasi yang terdiri dari Beban Pegawai dan Beban Barang Jasa tahun 2019 mengalami kenaikan sebesar 5,46% dibandingkan dengan Beban Operasi yang terdiri dari Beban Pegawai dan Beban Barang Jasa tahun 2018. Meskipun terdapat 4 pos Beban yang megalami penurunan yang siginifikan, yaitu Beban Persediaan Bahan/ Material, Beban Makanan dan Minuman, Beban Perjalanan Dinas, dan Beban Pemeliharaan, tetapi pada pos Beban yang lainnya mengalami kenaikan yang cukup tinggi bahkan ada yang mencapai 100% karena pos-pos beban tersebut tidak muncul pada tahun 2018.