Participants reviewed data and the projections for the State in 2025 - 2026. Participants were provided with an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of predictive models as well as an overview of the mindset for target-setting. Participants were told they would be selecting the end target (2025 - 2026) for a given Indicator. The State would then calculate intervening targets between FFY2020 and FFY2025 whereby there would be no increase in the target the first year, followed by increases in small increments. Using small increments at the beginning is to allow enough time for LEAs to implement initiatives and to change practices so they can realistically meet the targets along their way to the rigorous end target. After this overview, the participants then determined a challenging and achievable target for the 2025 - 2026 school year. The USBE calculated intervening targets and shared these intervening targets with the participants as well as additional stakeholders to get final approval for all the targets. A survey was sent out and 101 individuals participated. Most participants identified as white females in suburban parts of Utah. American Indian or Native Alaskan, Hispanic/Latino, and individuals who identified as two or more races also participated. Targets were impacted by this stakeholder feedback. The USBE recommended targets for Indicator 5 were considered too high by participants. The USBE revised the targets to maintain rigor and develop reasonable targets manageable by the LEAs. Targets were developed after review of historical data, in consultation with the USBE statistician, APR summit and APR survey review, and subsequently reviewed and adopted by USBE staff, USEAP, and LEAs. Indicator 1 During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed graduation data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID-19 data from 2018 was determined to be an appropriate baseline. With a baseline of 67.90%, targets will increase with consideration for COVID-19 impacts. Indicator 2 During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed dropout data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID-19 data from 2018 was determined to be an appropriate baseline. With a baseline of 25.81%, targets will decrease with consideration for COVID-19 impacts. Indicator 3A During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed assessment participation data. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. This target cannot be changed by the USBE. Stakeholders discussed ways to improve participation. Indicators 3B, C, and D During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed assessment proficiency and gap data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants looked at the average mean from the previous four years of data in conjunction with the linear trend and forecasting. This pr ocess allowed participants to analyze the best statistical guess of where Utah's data would most likely be in six years while also seeing the forecasting of possible error over time for predicting far into the future. Once agreement among participants was finalized on the long term six-year target, the USBE set smaller increases in the early years with more significant increases in the later years. Indicator 5 During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed educational environment data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID-19 data from 2018 was determined to be an appropriate baseline. With baselines of (A) 65.12%, (B) 9.71%, (C) 2.67%, targets will gradually increase and decrease with consideration for COVID-19 impacts. Indicator 6 During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed preschool educational environment data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID-19 data from 2018 was determined to be an appropriate baseline. With baselines of (A) 46.86%, (B) 32.67%, (C) 0.25%, targets will gradually increase and decrease with consideration for COVID-19 impacts. Indicator 7 During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed preschool outcomes data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID-19 data from 2018 was determined to be an appropriate baseline. The USBE predicts that outcomes for this Indicator are still being largely impacted by COVID-19, and targets are currently set below the baseline. With baselines of (A1) 88.86%, (A2) 58.94%, (B1) 88.41%, (B2) 50.48%, (C1) 89.86%, (C2) 70.52%, targets will increase with consideration for COVID-19 impacts. Indicator 8 During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed parent involvement data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID-19 data from 2018 was determined to be an appropriate baseline. With a baseline of 78.38%, targets will gradually increase with consideration for COVID-19 impacts. Indicators 4, 9, 10, 11, and 12 During the APR Summit, stakeholders reviewed current data trends and ways to improve outcomes. Although targets cannot be changed, stakeholder input has been instrumental in meeting the targets for these Indicators. Input has been utilized to determine professional learning and support provided to bridge the gap between current performance and the targets. Indicator 13 The USBE recognizes this is an area requiring improvement. During the APR Summit, stakeholders reviewed current data trends and ways to improve outcomes. Although targets cannot be changed, stakeholder input has been instrumental in the progression toward meeting the target. Indicator 14 During the APR Summit, the USBE reviewed post-school outcomes data and recommendations of the USBE statistician. Participants analyzed trend data as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. Pre-COVID-19 data from 2018 was determined to be an appropriate baseline. The USBE predicts that outcomes for this Indicator are still being largely impacted by COVID-19, and targets are currently set below the baseline. With baselines of (A) 19.62%, (B) 67.60%, (C) 84.37%, targets will increase with consideration for COVID-19 impacts. Indicator 15 The USBE continues to experience relatively low levels of due process hearing requests and resolution meetings and is not required to set a target. Indicator 16 The USBE continues to experience relatively low levels of dispute resolution requests, including mediation. Targets have been set based on the low level of mediation requests.