Regulatory Reform (Fire Safety) Order 2005 Fire Risk Assessment

FIRE PROTECTION MEASURES
17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan.
17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE
17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire.	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes Reasonable distances of travel: N/A Including doors, screens, and walls. The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. No X More specifically:	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A

Adequate design of escape routes?	Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X	No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X	No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes	X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes Reasonable distances of travel: N/A Including doors, screens, and walls. The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes Reasonable distances of travel:

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel?	Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes Reasonable distances of travel: N/A Including doors, screens, and walls. The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. No X
17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes Reasonable distances of travel: N/A Including doors, screens, and walls.
17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes Reasonable distances of travel: N/A	X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed?	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes	X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people.	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No

17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4	17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed:
17. MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE 17.1 It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable Yes X No means of escape in case of fire. N/A 17.2 More specifically: Yes X No Adequate design of escape routes? design of escape routes? Yes X No Adequate provision of exits? Yes X No Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? Yes X No Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? Yes X No Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? Yes X No Satisfactory means for securing exits? Reasonable distances of travel: • Where there is a single direction of travel? Yes X No • Where there are alternative means of escape? N/A X Yes No Yes No X Suitable protection of escape routes? Including doors, screens, and walls. N/A X Yes No Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes X No Escape routes unobstructed? N/A Yes X No 17.3 It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. 17.4 Comments and deficiencies observed: The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan. Escape routes unobstructed? Yes N/A Yes It is considered that the building is provided with reasonable arrangements for means of escape for disabled people. No X 17.1 No Yes Yes X • Where there are alternative means of escape? X Suitable protection of escape routes? Fire exits open in direction of escape where necessary? No Comments and deficiencies observed: Suitable fire precautions for all inner rooms? Yes N/A X X No No No Yes Yes Yes X • Where there is a single direction of travel? X Avoidance of sliding or revolving doors as fire exits where necessary? X N/A 17.4 No 17.3 Adequate provision of exits? It is considered that the site is provided with reasonable means of escape in case of fire. Exits easily and immediately openable where necessary? No MEANS OF ESCAPE FROM FIRE X 17.2 Yes No No Yes Satisfactory means for securing exits? Yes Reasonable distances of travel: N/A Including doors, screens, and walls. The means of escape is considered satisfactory. It was noted that the seventh floor has been closed and locked off this is considered satisfactory as it does not affect the means of escape. There were a number of defects noted during the inspection - refer to action plan.