ahmedheakl/docatlas_instruct huggingface dataset:
### Brollach

#### Clr. Joe Conway, Méara, Comhairle Cathrach & Contae Phort Láirge:

Mar Mhéara ar Chomhairle Cathrach agus Contae Phort Láirge, táim an-sásta fáilte a chur roimh an gcéad Innéacs Siúil agus Rothaíochta do Limistéar Cathrach Phort Láirge. Agus cúrsaí i gContae Phort Láirge agus i gContae Chill Chainnigh faoi chaibidil inti, is iomaí léargas fónta atá le fáil sa tuarascáil seo maidir le hiompraíochtaí agus tuairimí daoine ina gcónaí sna contaetha sin i leith siúil agus rothaíochta. Mar dhuine atá ina chónaí anseo le fada an lá, tá taithí phearsanta agam ar an sásamh atá le baint as taisteal gníomhach ag ar an mborradh atá tagtha faoi le blianta beaga anuas. Tarraingíonn na sonraí faoi iamh aird ar an dúil mhór atá ag muintir Phort Láirge sa tsiúlóid agus sa rothaíocht. Tá sé le léamh ar an tuarascáil seo go bhfuil pobal Phort Láirge go mór i bhfabhar infheistiú a dhéanamh i dtaisteal gníomhach, agus 68% de mhuintir na háite i bhfabhar breis infheistithe a dhéanamh i mbonneagar siúil agus rothaithe, agus 63% díobh i bhfabhar breis infheistithe a dhéanamh i mbonneagar rothaíochta. I mbeagán focal, áit ina mbeidh daoine agus gnólachtaí faoi bhláth. Agus tacaíocht á bhfáil acu ón Údarás Náisiúnta Iompair, tá an-obair déanta ag Comhairle Cathrach agus Contae Phort Láirge le blianta beaga anuas agus neart tionscadal eile ar na bacáin acu. Agus é go mór i mbéal an phobail anois, téann an Glasbhealach chomh fada le croílár na cathrach a bhuí leis an nasc ó Charraig na bhFraochán go Lár na Cathrach a críochnaíodh le déanaí. Táthar i mbun droichead iompair inbhuanaithe a thógáil faoi láthair trasna na Siúire i Lár Chathair Phort Láirge le Glasbhealach Phort Láirge a nascadh le ceantar na nDuganna Thuaidh agus an Glasbhealach idir Cathair Phort Láirge agus Ros Mhic Thriúin. Is léir ón tuarascáil seo na buntáistí a bhaineann le taisteal gníomhach agus an dúil atá ag muintir an mhórcheantair uirbigh ann, agus leanfaidh Comhairle Cathrach agus Contae Phort Láirge go dian dícheallach i mbun Port Láirge a fhorbairt mar áit thaitneamhach ina gcaitheann gach duine saol sláintiúil inbhuanaithe ann.
- 2. Информация о выполнении целевых показателей реализации муниципальной программы (прилагается к годовому отчету)

Наименование целевого показателя	Единица измерения	Значение целевого показателя	Причина отклонения от планового значения
базовое на 2013 год	плановое	фактическое
1	2	3	4	5	6
МП «Модернизация и реформирование объектов жилищно-коммунального хозяйства Угличского муниципального района на 2014-2021 годы»	Х
Уровень газификации жилищного фонда, в т.ч.:	%	54,6	59	59	Х
- уровень газификации жилищного фонда г.Углича	%	84,5	88,7	88,7	Х
-уровень газификации жилищного фонда сельской местности	%	11,5	15,8	15,8	Х

3. Информация об изменениях, внесенных ответственным исполнителем в муниципальную программу в 2020 году: 3.1. Постановление АУМР от 19.02.2020г. №192 «О внесении изменений в Постановление Администрации Угличского муниципального района от 01.12.2010 №1378 «Об утверждении муниципальной программы «Модернизация и реформирование объектов жилищно-коммунального хозяйства Угличского муниципального района на 2014-2021 годы» (уточнение объемов финансирования, показателей, объектов). 3.2. Постановление АУМР от 22.07.2020г. №720 «О внесении изменений в Постановление Администрации Угличского муниципального района от 01.12.2010 №1378 «Об утверждении муниципальной программы «Модернизация и реформирование объектов жилищно-коммунального хозяйства Угличского муниципального района на 2014-2021 годы» (уточнение объемов финансирования, показателей, объектов). 3.3. Постановление АУМР от 09.03.2021 №242 «О внесении изменений в Постановление Администрации Угличского муниципального района от 01.12.2010 №1378 «Об утверждении муниципальной программы «Модернизация и реформирование объектов жилищно-коммунального хозяйства Угличского муниципального района на 2014-2021 годы» (уточнение объемов финансирования, показателей, объектов).

4. Конкретные результаты реализации муниципальной программы, достигнутые за отчетный период.

- 4.1. Достигнуты запланированные значения целевых показателей.

4.2. В пределах доведенных бюджетных ассигнований осуществлялось погашение кредиторской задолженности по ранее заключенным договорам и контрактам.
### Stadtverwaltung Altenburg Untere Denkmalschutzbehörde Markt 1

## Tag des offenen Denkmals 2022

## Bitte senden Sie den ausgefüllten Fragebogen bis zum 05.08.2022 an die obengenannte Anschrift oder per E-Mail an denkmalschutz@stadt-altenburg.de zurück.

### Am 11.09.2022, dem Tag des offenen Denkmals, werden wir folgendes Denkmal öffnen und vor- stellen:

Landkreis Stadt/Gemeinde:
Anschrift des geöffneten Denkmals:
Name des Kultur-/ Bodendenkmals
Kurzbeschreibung (z.B. historische Daten)
Öffnungszeiten am 12.09.2021
Führungen/Sonderaktionen (z.B. Fahrradtour, Wande- rung, Konzert, etc.) (Zeit, Treffpunkt, wer führt etc.)
Ansprechpartner Herr/Frau	Anschrift:	Tel.: E-Mail:

### Ort/Datum: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_ Unterschrift: \_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_\_

Gleichzeitig bitten wir Sie darum, der Unteren Denkmalschutzbehörde bis zum Montag, den 12.09.2022, 12:00 Uhr, die Besu- cherzahlen in Ihrem Objekt mitzuteilen. Diese Angaben werden für die Medien und für Statistik benötigt.

Die Untere Denkmalschutzbehörde erreichen Sie am Veranstaltungstag von 08:00 Uhr bis 20:00 Uhr unter der Telefonnummer 0151/16259870.
- 3.2. - Azterketa-zoosanitarioak

### 3.2.1. - Salmonella ren programa sanitarioa

Salmonella autoazterketa bat egin beharko dute urtero ( S. enteritidis , S. typhimurium ) horretarako gaitutako albaitariek.

- 3.2.2. - Oiloen jatorria

Txitak baimendutako hazkuntza-zentroetatik ekarriko dira, eta Salmonella enteritidis eta typhimurium hautemateko nahitaezko kontrolak egingo zaizkie jaiotzen diren egunean bertan eta errunaldi-unitatera eraman baino 2 aste lehenago; horretaz gain, dagokien legezko dokumentazioa gehitu behar da:

- Jatorriaren gida. - Salmonellaren derrigorrezko txertoa eman izanaren ziurtagiria/Salmonellarik ez dutelako ziurtagiria.

- 3.3. - Hazkuntza-sistema

Hazkuntza-sistema guztiak daude onartuta, baina indarrean dagoen araudia betetzea eskatuko da.

Errunadli mota	Ekologikoak	2018/848 (EE) Erregelamendua
Ekologikoak	Ekologikoak	3/2002 Errege Dekretua
Larrekoak	589/2008 (EE) Erregelamenduaren II. eranskina eta 3/2002 Errege Dekretua.
Lurzorukoak
Kaiolakoak	589/2008 (EE) Erregelamenduaren II. eranskina eta 3/2002 Errege Dekretua.

Elikadurak behar adina nutriente eman behar dizkie oiloei, hegaztien adina eta ekoizpen-egoera kontuan hartuta.

- 3.4. - Langileak

Arrautzen manipulatzaileek gauzatzen duten lan-jarduerari dagozkion elikadurako higiene-alderdiei buruzko prestakuntza jaso beharko dute. Halaber, langileek jardunbide higieniko pertsonal egokiak beteko dituzte, arrautzen manipulazio- eta ontziratze-prozesuan produktua kutsatzea ekiditeko.

- 3.5. - Instalazioak eta ekipamenduak

Lurzoru eta hormen gainazalak iragazgaitzak izan beharko dira, baita garbitzen eta desinfektatzen errazak ere, eta egoera onean mantendu behar dira. Debekatuta daude gainazal porotsuak. Sabai, sabai aizun eta gainerako instalazio esekiak zikinkeria eta lizuna ez pilatzeko eta partikularik ez erortzeko moduan diseinatuko dira, horretarako akabera egokiarekin.

66
### An Coimisiún Athchóirithe Dlí

####### Ráiteas Ioncaim agus Caiteachais agus Cúlchistí Ioncaim Coinneáilte Bliain dár gcríoch 31 Nollag 2018

Ioncam	Nóta	2018 €	2017 €
Deontas an Oireachtais	2	2,008,675	2,190,289
Díolachán Foilseacháin	210	475
Eile	6,153	362
Aistriú ó/(go) Cuntas Caipitil	35,650	(300,644)
Glanmhaoiniú iarchurtha do phinsin	7(c)	95,000	86,000
Ioncaim Cíosa	-	61,871
Ioncaim Cíosa cúitithe d'Oifig AG	-	(61,871)
Caiteachas	2,145,688	1,976,482
Tuarastail	5	1,093,740	1,043,161
Pinsin	7(a)	152,364	142,724
IT	65,295	77,686
Cíos agus táillí seirbhíse	308,229	575,473
Áitribh - Teach Chloiche - Caiteachais Athlonnaithe	-	25,428
Solas agus Téamh	10,764	1,161
Deisiúcháin agus Cothabháil - Foirgnimh	4,253	1,789
Árachas	3,463	1,577
Guthán	10,654	12,725
Stáiseanóireacht agus bainistíocht oifige	30,159	25,493
Seiminéir	1,587	1,930
Leabharlann	89,489	82,458
Taisteal agus maireachtáil	22,053	15,713
Glantachán	9,244	9,221
Priontáil	20,892	3,386
Postáil	1,829	2,373
Dímheas	88,615	79,867
Caiteachais Oifige Eile	706	728
Luach airgid iniúchóirí	9,000	9,000
Oiliúint	34,395	24,301
Tacaíocht Chorparáideach	31,857	29,147
Táillí gairmiúla	41,521	44,545
Comhdháil Bhliantúil	4,220	5,687
Caillteanas ar dhiúscairt sócmhainní sheasta inbhraite	-	32,755
2,034,329	2,248,328
Farasbarr/(Easnamh) don Bhliain	111,359	(271,846)
Iarmhéid ar aghaidh ag 1 Eanáir 2018	(51,853)	219,953
Iarmhéid curtha ar aghaidh ag 31 Nollaig 2018	59,506	(51,853)

######## Comhdhéanann an Ráiteas Sreabhaidh Airgid agus nótaí 1 go 14 cuid de na ráitis airgeadais sin

####### An Breitheamh Onórach Mary Laffoy Uachtarán
трубопровод.	состоянии.
14.	Вентиляция	Приточно-вытяжная	В удовлетворительном состоянии
Короба	отсутствуют
Жалюзийных решеток	отсутствуют
15.	Электрооборудование	Щиты этажные	В удовлетворительном состоянии
Вводные шкафы	В удовлетворительном состоянии
Сети	В удовлетворительном состоянии, в соответствии с постройкой дома.
16.	Лифты	отсутствуют
17.	Мусоропроводы-стояки	отсутствуют
18.	Радио и телеустройства	имеется	В удовлетворительном состоянии
19.	Оголовки	Кирпичные оштукатуреные,	В удовлетворительном состоянии

Выводы и предложения на основании результатов осмотра комиссия считает, что необходимо выполнить: 1. Ремонт цоколя. 2.Ремонт отмостки и внутридворовой територии. 3. Замена ввода ХВС в подвале. 4. Ремонт замков на свесах.
### SHAORÁNAIGH Ginearálta SHAORÁNAIGH Ginearálta

#### Comhaltaí Boird: Comhaltaí reatha an Bhoird:

- • Catherine Heaney (ceaptha Iúil 2021)
- • Teresa Blake (ceaptha Nollaig 2020)
- • Claire Byrne (ceaptha Meán Fómhair 2022)
- • Mary Corcoran (ceaptha Deireadh Fómhair 2023)
- • Catriona Curtis (ceaptha Deireadh Fómhair 2023)
- • Mary Dorgan (ceaptha Deireadh Fómhair 2023)
- • Sarah Harte (ceaptha Meán Fómhair 2022)
- • Brid O'Donovan (ceaptha Meán Fómhair 2022)
- • Ian Power (ceaptha Meitheamh 2016, athcheaptha Meitheamh 2021 agus Meán Fómhair 2022)
- • Seán Sheridan (ceaptha Samhain 2015, athcheaptha i mí na Nollag 2020)
- • Seamus Smith (ceaptha Meán Fómhair 2022)
- • Stephen Lycett (ceaptha Aibreán 2023)
- • Fiona Ward (ceaptha Deireadh Fómhair 2023)
- • Orlagh Nevin (ceaptha Aibreán 2024)
- • Patrick Gibbons (ceaptha Meitheamh 2024)

Cathaoirleach: Catherine Heaney

Seoladh: Teach Ché Sheoirse 43 Sráid Chnoc na Lobhar Baile Átha Cliath 2

Príomhoifigeach Feidhmiúcháin: Graham Long (Sealadach)

Rúnaí: Caroline Mitchell

Dlíodóirí: Holmes O'Malley Sexton LLP Svuít 1 Geata an Easpaig Sráid Anraí Luimneach

Baincéirí: AIB 52 Sráid Bhagóid Uachtarach Baile Átha Cliath 4

Iniúchóirí: Comptroller and Auditor General 3a Sráid an Mhéara Uachtarach Baile Átha Cliath 1

Iniúchóirí Inmheánacha: Sumer(TÉ) 4ú Urlár Teach Glendinning 6 Sráid Murray Béal Feirste BT15DN
CCTP Typ: LOGISTICS PLATEFORM – GTB-Solution “DALI 2”

- according to IEC 62386 part 304. Parameterization is possible via a multi-master application controller from any manufacturer on DALI 2 protocol.

- PD11-BMS-DALI2-FC: Ø 9 m across, Ø 6 m towards, Ø 3 m seated
- Applications: Offices
- PD4N-BMS-DALI2-SM/FC: Ø 24 m across, Ø 8 m towards, Ø 6,40 m seated
- Applications: Meeting rooms / Halls
- PD4N-BMS-DALI2-C SM/FC: 40 x 5 m across, 20 x 3 m towards, Ø 8 m vertical
- Applications: Circulation
- LC-Mini-120°-BMS-DALI2: 12 m across, 3 m towards
- Applications: Stairs
- PD4-BMS-DALI2-Large Height: Ø 30 x Ø 19 m towards
- Applications: Loading areas, Racks, Rack access aisles
video. If that’s what the person needs or if it’s in picture format or - you need to do that, that’s what the practice standards say. GH: I think it’s also true that the Commission, now that we’re into our third year of operation, most of the transition activity largely completed, that we have a role to play too I think in assisting in the development of things that help providers in facilitating some of those conversations with people with disability who are participants in the scheme. We think it’s absolutely the case that providers need to be making vigorous efforts around those fit for purpose communication tools and we also see ourselves as having a role in supporting participants to get that information, some of which is information that’s created by others and some of which is information created by us. GT: Are there any particular – you’ve mentioned in positive communication that – are there any particular aspects of the practice standards that you're finding the providers are continuing to get wrong or misunderstand? ST: I think I’d make the point again that we made in the beginning of the conversation, that this is really new and George, the number of times I have to say things like “they’re practice standards, not audit standards, there’s a clue in the title”. I’d love a dollar for every time I’ve said that because these are practice standards that have been designed so carefully and with input from people like you, from broader community of people with disability and people who represent them, to describe what good practice means when you’re working with someone with disability. Using them as a tick-box to pass an audit or to say “yes, I’ve done that” is not going to make the kind of practice change that we want to have happen in disability services. So I think what we’re at 3 years in with those practice standards is a sector which is thinking deeply I hope about how they need to adjust what they do, how they work with people, how they engage with them to really embed that right space practice into every aspect of service delivery including how you deliver SDA to a person. GT: That’s really interesting, I think you hit it on the head that people just often think how will I pass all that, rather than thinking how can I make my service as good as it can be, right? ST: Yeah. GT: I’m just thinking, do you guys have any practical advice around that? GH: Well, I mean I think it’s a bit related to what Sam just said and a bit related to me, what I was saying earlier about right space service delivery. I have certainly observed in a long career that’s included long periods of regulating that sometimes people are very focused on describing their aspirations in terms of a set of values, but your values are really about what you do, not what you would like to believe about what you were doing. So my advice to people really is yes, be very clear about what you aspire to but be absolutely scrupulous about assessing, well where are we in terms of what we do and how we work with the people we work with. Are we all

5
But in the end, he was thinking about evil and how much of it was not only permitted, but endorsed by the Christian philosophers or his most prominent critics. Today we talk about David Lewis versus the Christians, and the legacy he leaves behind in the 21st century. How would you characterize your marriage with David? That’s a big question, but. Steffi Lewis: Lewis: People used to ask, how could you be married to somebody like that? The answer is you just are. Barry Lam: Lam: Who would ask that? Steffi Lewis: Lewis: Oh, some shit ass graduate student. Barry Lam: Lam: That’s a that’s a stupid question. Steffi Lewis: Lewis: A very stupid question. People would say, “Well, what do you talk about a breakfast?” And the answer to that is, “Well, what would you like for dinner” and “what all the cat did yesterday” and that kind of stuff. Neither of us much wanted to be parents. It was agreed early on that we weren’t going to have children. Neither of us much wanted them, so that so that was never an issue. I think that neither of us much trusted the other as a parent. I mean, can you see David Lewis as a parent, singing lullabies to his children? Barry Lam: Lam: I don’t see why not. Steffi Lewis: Lewis: I bet you he would have sung too Barry Lam: Lam: I see that. Frank Jackson: Jackson: He wasn’t a bad singer, people. Perhaps you may not know that he was actually quite good at singing Barry Lam: Lam: Frank Jackson philosopher in Australia and friend. Frank Jackson: Jackson: So he would sing Australian folk ballads really, really rather well. My children got on wonderfully well with him. Two of my children were quite young when David was visiting Australia. He might do a little singing, and he was slightly unusual and I think that the children found that very interesting. They knew he was a pretty good philosopher, but they weren’t in awe of him in the way that fellow philosophers tended to be. Steffi Lewis: Lewis: Well, he treated children like sort of like baby adults. Frank Jackson’s children are very nice. When they were babies, they were very nice, and David was a kind of adjunct to uncle. He’d walk with them and tell them stories and sing songs in his fairly starchy way. David was affectionate with them. Barry Lam: Lam: When you said you didn’t trust each other as parents and you mentioned a little bit about David, what did you mean by he might not have trusted you as a parent?
GT: I had a podcast with tenants on this same topic and I asked them “what’s the main thing that you want from your provider?” and they said “I want them to listen to me” and I was like you can almost, you know, bring down all of the components of the practice standards to those 3 words, “listen to me”. GH: That’s right and I think in discussions we’ve had before about and I don’t know whether this is where you want me to address this issue in today’s conversation, but where we’ve talked about right space to service delivery, that really this is about the person who is accessing these services for whom they’re for, being at the centre of what’s thought about and at the centre of action about the provision of those services. That means it’s not about what value that you’ve got on the office wall if you’re a provider, it means how do you behave to the people who utilise your services? Are those people properly at the centre of how you construct your business model and service model? Do you listen to people? Are they truly the centre of what you do? GT: Absolutely. What do you think, Samantha? ST: Well I was just thinking as you were both talking it’s not how pretty the kitchen is in SDA or how great the bedrooms are or how shiny the taps – well for some people it might be, but that’s not the whole story. It is how a provider works with you to help you live in that place, how they work with the other providers that you might need to live your life well in that place or even, of course, outside that place. How are they thinking about what they need to do as the provider who’s delivering the pretty kitchen and the nice curtains? How does that need to fit in the context of your whole life and your whole experience? So quality in SDA is not only about a good building, it’s about how you engage with people who are living there, how you’re providing a service to them in making sure that all the things they need to live well in that place are connected up for them. GT: Yeah, absolutely. It is also about recognising that – and I think that this is true for a lot of the new providers, is that understanding that people with disability are very much tenants and consumers, are just like everyone else and will have the same concerns and needs around their property, right? GH: Yeah and the same desires about feeling confident that things can be organised in ways that suit them. All of us have really highly idiosyncratic ways that we like things to work for us in our home environments and they don’t correspond always to what other people make sense and you want to know that it’s so central to who we are, where we live and how our living spaces are organised for us that you don’t want to be adapting your needs and aspirations around the way the person providing those services wants to provide them. That’s back to front, really. GT: Absolutely. I'd like to talk now about some of the challenges that you have seen in the sector in getting to grips with quality and safeguarding and it would be really great if you could talk us through some things that you’ve seen around the challenges for delivering quality in SDA.

3
## Na Fíneálacha Beartaithe i leith Sáruithe Reachtacha Beagfheithicle Seirbhíse Poiblí

### Cúlra

Tá na cionta reatha íocaíochta seasta agus na méideanna forordaithe gaolmhara íocaíochta leagtha amach i Sceideal 8 a ghabhann leis na Rialacháin um Rialáil Tacsaithe (Beagfheithicil Seirbhíse Poiblí), 2015. Is leagtha amach freisin atá mionsonraí faoin gcineál agus faoin líon Fógraí Íocaíochta Seasta (fíneálacha) a eisíodh sna blianta 2018 agus 2019. Tá an fhaisnéis sin ar áireamh in Aguisín A.

Tháinig an sceideal cionta reatha íocaíochta seasta chun bheith ann mar thoradh ar thuarascáil fhadréimseach a foilsíodh ar an tionscal beagfheithiclí seirbhíse poiblí (tacsaithe, fruilcharranna agus limisíní) i mí na Nollag 2011. Ba é an Grúpa Athbhreithnithe um Rialáil Tacsaithe, a bhí faoi chathaoirleacht ag an Uas. Alan Kelly TD, Aire Stáit don Iompar Poiblí agus Comaitéireachta ag an am, a sholáthair an tuarascáil sin. Ba é an príomhacht a bhí i bhfeidhm ag an am ná an tAcht um Rialáil Tacsaithe, 2003, rud a raibh roinnt ionstraimí reachtúla ag gabháil leis, i dteannta píosaí éagsúla reachtaíochta um thrácht ar bhóithre agus um shábháilteacht ar bhóithre. Chuimsigh an Grúpa Athbhreithnithe oibritheoirí agus tiománaithe beagfheithicle seirbhíse poiblí (tacsaithe, fruilcharranna agus limisíní), oibritheoirí seoltacha, tomhaltóirí, Ranna Rialtais, agus gníomhaireachtaí rialála agus forfheidhmiúcháin.

Bhí sé mar aidhm leis an athbhreithniú a chinntiú go mbeadh muinín ag tomhaltóirí as an gcóras tacsaithe agus go bhféadfaí oibritheoirí agus tiománaithe dlisteanacha inniúla a chúiteamh go cothrom trína bheith ag oibriú faoi chreat rialála a fhorfheidhmítear go leordhóthanach. Bhí na nithe seo a leanas i measc na bpríomh- shaincheisteanna a ndearna an Grúpa Athbhreithnithe breithniú orthu:

- 1. an soláthar agus an t-éileamh sa mhargadh tacsaithe;
- 2. cáilíocht agus costas na seirbhísí a sholáthraítear don tomhaltóir;
- 3. athchóirithe ar cheadúnú tiománaithe agus feithiclí;
- 4. comhlíonadh agus forfheidhmiú;
- 5. seirbhísí inrochtana tacsaí do dhaoine a bhfuil soghluaisteacht laghdaithe acu agus do dhaoine faoi mhíchumas;
- 6. bainistíocht flít agus rialuithe cíosa;
- 7. sábháilteacht agus slándáil tomhaltóirí a chosaint agus caighdeáin seirbhíse a chosaint do thomhaltóirí;

Lúnasa 2022

Comhairliúchán Poiblí ar Thograí le haghaidh Fíneálacha Beagfheithicle Seirbhíse Poiblí don Lucht Neamhchomhlíonta agus Thréimhse Bhailíochta an Cheadúnais Tiománaí Beagfheithicle Seirbhíse Poiblí - Formáid Inrochtana
### An Coimisiún Athchóirithe Dlí

### Nótaí ar na ráitis airgeadais (ar lean) Bliain airgeadais dár gcríoch 31 Nollaig 2018

### Breacadh Síos ar Shochar Gearrtréimhseacha na bhFostaithe

#### Léiríonn an tábla thíos pá na bhfostaithe sa bhreis ar €60,000

€	2018	2017
60,000 - 69,999	2	1
70,000 - 79,999	0	0
80,000 - 89,999	0	0
90,000 - 99,999	2	2
100,000 - 109,999	0	0
110,000 - 119,999	0	0
120,000 - 129,999	0	0
130,000 - 139,999	0	0
140,000 - 149,999	1	1

### Sochair na bhFostaithe Comhiomlán

2018	2017
Sochair Gearrtréimhseacha na Foirne	€ 1,093,740	€ 1,043,161
Sochair Foirceannta	0	0
Costais Sochair ar Scor	57,364	59,000
Ranníocaíocht an Fhostóra do	0	0
Leas Sóisialta	0	0
Iomlán	1,151,104	1,102,161

Ba é líon iomlán na mball foirne fostaithe (WTE) ag deireadh na bliana ná 18 (2017 :18) Ní raibh aon ragobair nó liúntais d'aon bhall foirne an Choimisiúin in 2018. Ní raibh íocaíochtaí foircinn in 2018.

### Príomh-phearsanra Bainistíochta

Ba é íocaíocht dóibh sin le tionchar/cinnteoireacht suntasach ná €442,785. Áirítear leis sin an tUachtarán, an Coimisinéir Lán-Aimseartha, Stiúrthóir Taighde, Bainisteoir Rochtana ar Reachtaíocht agus Ceannaire Riaracháin.

#### Bhí €41,124 asbhainte ón fhoireann trí mheán tobhaigh pinsin agus íoctha le hOifig an Ard- Aighne (€38,340 in 2017)

### Leathanach 21