Raffaele specified that he stopped using the computer around midnight and that he received a telephone call from his father on house phone at 11 PM. He also reminded that in the morning Amanda went away in order to take a shower and change her clothes in her own house and that, at her return, she told him about the blood and the open door. He also reiterated the episode about the feces inside the toilet, stating that he just leaned towards the water and believed see only the transparency of the water. Raffaele added to have called the 112 before the arrival of the police patrol. During the interrogation Raffaele supplied clarifications on the content of some of his writings appeared on his blog, in which he made strange references to the monster of Foligno and where he declared to be in search for strong emotions. Moreover, in the meantime it was verified that the 112 calls were made by Sollecito at 12:51 PM and 12:54 PM, therefore they were consecutive to the arrival of the Police patrol, attested at 12:35 PM, and that no call from his father arrived to his home phone during that night.

10 - The Gip, in conclusion, decided to validate the preventive detention and to apply in regards to Sollecito, Knox and Lumumda the measure of pre-trial detention with order dated on 11- 09-2007: the provision was based on the reconstruction of the facts deducted from the preliminary relation of Dr. Lalli and the spontaneous declarations of Ms.Knox, involving both Lumumba and the girl, it was also based on the contradictions emerged from the respective declarations of the aforementioned and on the lack of proofs about the presence of Lumumba in his pub, and also on the inconsistency of Sollecito's report, on the proof provided by his possession of shoes presenting correspondent sole to the one which had left the imprint in the room of the victim and on the ulterior observation of the possession from part of the boy of a switch-knife whose blade had been considered by Dr. Lalli compatible with the wounds inflicted on Meredith.

11 - The situation photographed since the contested order has however been subject to remarkable further adjustments Some information regarding this can be considered impressive. Particularly it has come to light that a palm imprint found in the blood on the pillow where the victim was lying, belonged to a recorded subject named Rudi Hermann Guede from Côte d'Ivoire. Subject corresponding to the so called "il barone" (the baron) of whom Bonassi Stefano, one of the four residents of the lower flow, briefly talked about, outlining him as a muscular subject, very attracted to Amanda and who, in a particular circumstance, being drunk, had slept in the house over the toilet. Furthermore, during the analysis of the found biological material it has come to light that the DNA obtained from the vaginal swab during the autopsy and form the fragment of toilet paper found inside the bathroom, where some feces were recovered, corresponds to the same male individual, different from the previous suspects and allegedly traceable to Guede. In such perspective, it is very easy to comprehend the revocation of the pre-trial detention applied on Lumunda, originally carried out according to direct and concrete elements. It appears to be crucial, not the contorted alibi proof, that is based on not always coherent and matching declarations, but much more the circumstance that the prosecution against Lumumba obtained from the