On the other hand it is well-known that every technological or scientific proof is a mute proof, that needs to be enliven and activated by its insertion in the framework of further proofs, ordinarily acquired. And then, beyond the fact that Sollecito during the review hearing has declared for the first time to have seen the movie "the Fabulous World of Amelie" from 9:10 PM, circumstance never reported before in the framework of that intermittent memory of which has been previously discussed, remains the fact that the analysis carried out until now would not be able to establish when the vision would have been finished. But what matters the most is the fact provided by Amanda herself, who precisely wrote, in her defense report dated 6 November, to have seen the movie before receiving Patrick Lumumba's message at 8:18 PM. It has to be added, in accordance to what previously observed, that the computer analysis constitutes a formidable positive validation of the involvement of Raffaele, because the recorded interaction at 5,32 AM gives the idea of an almost sleepless night, confirmed by the subsequent reactivation of the cellular phone, events very distant from the asserted serene awakening at 10 AM and contrasting with the stated use of the computer until the 3:33 AM (this would already contrast with the multiple activities, like washings, sex, smoke and other, which the two have confusedly affirmed to have carried out). [end p 31] And then it is easy to conclude that Sollecito, wanting to create an alibi, has just ended up creating an ulterior and important proof against him, result of the failure of that alibi, denied by the convergent outcomes of the Fraud Police's reports and the declarations of the co-suspect.

30 - On the other hand the hour of death of the poor Meredith has to be placed over or between 22 PM, borrowing the conclusions of the consultant Dr. Lalli, to be updated to the light of the verified anticipation of the dinner of the victim. So, once excluded that Raffaele was watching the movie, that is to say, for principle of non-contradiction, that at that hour he was not using the computer, must be concluded that the aforementioned is completely lacking in alibi for the hour of the woman's death and indeed that the failure of the alibi is worth to increase the quantity of proofs that concentrically reach up to him, having necessarily to think that he was carrying out some other unmentionable act.

31 - It is has not to be neglected in the same perspective that Sollecito, anything but accidentally, tried to attribute his own presence in the house also with the asserted telephone call received from his father on the home telephone at 11 PM. However, also in this case, he has been resoundingly denied, not resulting any telephone call of the father at that hour. Neither can simply be advanced that Sollecito could has gotten confused with another telephone call of his father, received on the cellular phone 8:40 PM. Results clear the strategic indication of the time, that coincides with the crucial phases of the happening.

32 - And at this time it cannot be omitted that the further co-suspect Rudi Hermann Guede lived at short distance from Sollecito. In such perspective it come out strengthened a reconstructive hypothesis based on an arranged action of more than one person, surely started after that Amanda had received the message from Patrick at 20:18 PM.