Actually those few seconds constitute an evidence of a predefined choice, while it appears striking that the 112 had been called after that the patrol of the Fraud Police unexpectedly appeared on the scene. Sollecito has repeatedly denied such circumstance, but the data, documented and witnessed does not give other choices. It is also true that the report concerning the declarations produced by Lana Elisabetta, regarding the recovery of the Ericsson cellular telephone, turns out to being opened at 12:46 PM, but that does not mean at all that the Fraud Police patrol, not composed by the ones who redacted the report, wouldn't had already set offed in the direction of via della Pergola, searching for the holder of the first telephone, before that verbalization and according to the informally learned news . Therefore it is believable that such patrol reached for the house, as attested, in non-suspect time, at 12:35 PM. [end p 24] Moreover all of this is confirmed from what reported by Altieri Luca, who stated that he reached the place at 12:45 PM finding the police patrol on site. It is not possible to understand the reason for which Sollecito would have had to enact that mise-en-scene, if he would have been external to the facts.

27 - Therefore, if on the basis of what has been found it is impossible to separate the positions, also because in the hypothesis in which he acted as simple accomplice, Raffaele would not have had a reason to hesitate further, submitting himself to the risk of a very more serious indictment, and it is also important to estimate ulterior arguments that are worth to confirm the reconstructive hypothesis. In the first place it is very meaningful that during that evening, almost at the same hour, Amanda and Raffaele's telephone traffic stopped, after that he had received a telephone call on the cellular by his father at 8:40 PM. And it is extremely relevant, also in relation to the matter of the pretended alibi, adduced by Raffaele, on which we will return diffusely, that, contrarily to what asserted by the aforementioned in more than one occasion, he wouldn't have gone to bed at 12 Am or 1 AM, but he had passed a very troubled night, to the point that he turned on his phone very early in the morning receiving a message from his father at 6 AM, which was confirmed by Sollecito, during the review hearing, to be a goodnight message, evidently sent when his telephone was off and for such reason it reached its destination only at the indicated hour. All of this gives the idea of a particularly agitated status, that on the evidence it contrasts with the defensive assumption according to which the two, overwhelmed by fatigue and drug abuse, they would have fell asleep late to woke up from a deep sleep around 10 AM.

28 - To crown it all, it has to be mentioned the recovery on the crime scene , precisely under the quilt that wrapped the victim, of an imprint on the blood, which, after being immediately photographed, it has turned out to be related to the one which could have being left by Sollecito with a pair of Nike shoes, size 42,5 (EU), seized to the boy during the detention. Regarding this, it has to be underlined that from a first technical report redacted by the Commissariato of P.S. of Foligno, signed by the assistant Mauro Capocci, had led to the conclusion that between the imprint and the shoe of Sollecito there was a possible correspondence for shape and dimensions.