##### Bibliography

Boudry, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2013). The mismeasure of machine: Synthetic biology and the trouble with engineering metaphors. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 44(4), 660-668. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2013.05.013 Boudry, M., & Pigliucci, M. (2016). Vindicating science – by bringing it down. In K. Rutten, S. Blancke & R. Soetaert (Eds.), The Culture of Science: Scientific Understanding & Cultural Representation: Purdue University Press. Boudry, M., & Pigliucci, M. (Eds.). (2017). Science Unlimited? On the challenges of scientism: University of Chicago Press. Boudry, M., & Vlerick, M. (2014). Natural Selection Does Care About Truth. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 28(1), 65–77. doi: 10.1080/02698595.2014.915651 Boyer, P. (2000). Natural epistemology or evolved metaphysics? Developmental evidence for early- developed, intuitive, category-specific, incomplete, and stubborn metaphysical presumptions. Philosophical psychology, 13(3), 277-297. Boyer, P., & Barrett, H. C. (2005). Domain specificity and intuitive ontology. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 96-118). Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons. Brown, T. L. (2003). Making truth: metaphor in science. Urbana (Ill.): University of Illinois press. Campbell, D. T. (1997). From evolutionary epistemology via selection theory to a sociology of scientific validity. Evolution and cognition, 3(1), 5-38. Carey, S., & Spelke, E. (1994). Domain-specific knowledge and conceptual change. In L. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind. Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chomsky, N. (1988). Language and problems of knowledge: The Managua lectures (Vol. 16): The MIT Press. Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind: Cambridge University Press. Chomsky, N. (2005). Rules and Representations. New York: Columbia University Press. Chomsky, N. (2014). Science, Mind, and Limits of Understanding. Paper presented at the The Science and Faith Foundation (STOQ), The Vatican. https://chomsky.info/201401\_\_/ Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. analysis, 7-19. De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2010). Science as structured imagination. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 44(1), 29-44. Dennett, D. C. (1991a). Consciousness explained. Boston: Little, Brown and Company. Dennett, D. C. (1991b, May 10). Review of McGinn, the problem of consciousness, The Times Literary Supplement, p. 10. Flanagan, O. J. (1992). Consciousness reconsidered: MIT press Cambridge, MA. Fodor, J. (1983). The Modularity of mind [electronic resource]: an essay on faculty psychology: The MIT Press. Gentner, D., & Jeziorski, M. (1993). The shift from metaphor to analogy in Western science. In A. Ortony, Metaphor & P. thought . New York: Cambridge University (Eds.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed.) (pp. 447-480). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. Giere, R. N. (2002). Scientific cognition as distributed cognition. In P. Carruthers, S. P. Stich & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 285-299). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Goldberg, S. (1984). Understanding relativity. Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a social world. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Henrich, J. (2015). The secret of our success: How culture is driving human evolution, domesticating our species, and making us smarter: Princeton University Press. Humphrey, N. (1999). A History of the Mind: Evolution and the Birth of Consciousness: Springer.