Krajcik, page 3

middle school students. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,13(2),437- 465. * Krajcik, J. (2015), Project-based Science: Engaging Students in 3-dimensional learning. The Science Teacher, 81(1), 25 – 27. The National Science Teacher Association. * Cooper, M. M., Caballero, M. D., Ebert-May, D., Fata-Hartley, C. L., Jardeleza, S. E., Krajcik, J. S., … Underwood, S. M. (2015). Challenge faculty to transform STEM learning. Science, 350(6258), 281–282. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.aab0933 *Coppola, B. P. and Krajcik, J. S. (2014), Discipline-centered post-secondary science education research: Distinctive targets, challenges and opportunities. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 51: 679–693. doi: 10.1002/tea.21165 +Krajcik, J. (2014) How to Select and Design Materials that Align to the Next Generation Science Standards, NSTABlog. http://nstacommunities.org/blog/2014/04/25/equip/ *Krajcik, J., Codere, S., Dahsah, C., Bayer, R., Mun, Kongu (2014). Planning Instruction to Meet the Intent of the Next Generation Science Standards, The Journal of Science Teacher Education, DOI 10.1007/s10972-014-9383-2, open access manuscript. * Coppola, B. P. and Krajcik, J. S. (2013), Discipline-centered post-secondary science education research: Understanding university level science learning. J. Res. Sci. Teach., 50: 627–638. doi: 10.1002/tea.21099 * Mayer, K., Damelin, D. Krajcik, J.S. (2013). Linked In: Using modeling as a link to other scientific practices, disciplinary core ideas and crosscutting concepts, The Science Teacher, 80(6) 57-62, The National Science Teacher Association. *Starr, M. & Krajcik, . (2013) Developing and Using Models to Align with NGSS, Science Scope, The National Science Teacher Association, September, 2013, pages 31 – 35. *Krajcik, J.S. (2013), The Next Generation Science Standards: a Focus on Physical Science, The Science Teacher, The National Science Teacher Association. *Matz, R. L., Rothman, E. D., Krajcik, J. S., & Banaszak Holl, M. M. (2012), Concurrent enrollment in lecture and laboratory enhances student performance and retention. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, in press (May issue vol 49, issue 5). *Mun, K., Mun, J., Cho, M., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2012). Development and application of 21st Century Scientific Literacy evaluation framework on Korean high school science text books. Journal of the Korean Association for Research in Science Education, 32(5), 789- 804. Krajcik, J., & Merritt, J. (2012) Engaging Students in Scientific Practices: What does constructing and revising models look like in the science classroom? The Science Teacher, National Science Teacher Association, Vol. 79, No. 3, pgs. 10 - 13. *Lee, O., & Krajcik, J. (2012), Large-scale interventions in science education for diverse student groups in varied educational settings. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 49(3), 271–280. *Nordine, J., Krajcik, J., and Fortus, D., 2011. Transforming energy instruction in middle school to support integrated understanding and future learning. Science Education, 95: 670-699. *Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S. & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of Scientific Literacy in South Korea for the 21st Century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697. *Krajcik, J. S. (2011). Learners Make Sense of Data: A 21st-Century Capability, Science & Children, National Science Teacher Association, January pgs. 8 & 9. *+Krajcik J.S. & Sutherland, L.M (2010). Supporting Students in Developing Literacy in Science. Science, American Association for the Advancement of Science, 328, 456 – 459. * Chang, H., Quintana, C., Krajcik, J.S. (2010). The Impact of Designing and Evaluating Molecular Animations on How Well Middle School Students Understand the Particulate Nature of Matter. Science Education, 94(1),73-94. *Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C. & Krajcik, J.S. (2010). Developing a Hypothetical Multi-Dimensional Learning Progression for the Nature of Matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 687 – 715. *Alozie, N. M., Moje, E. B., Krajcik, J. S. (2010). An analysis of the supports and constraints for scientific discussion in high school project-based science. Science Education, 94(3), 395–427.