I also illustrate that point by stating that when we look at the Financial Intelligence Unit of the Reserve Bank, when we look at their reports and the people that it fingered, there is not a single Private Voluntary Organisation or Non-Governmental Organisation that has been cited. Instead, those are private companies that have been fingered. So at the end of the day, the Anti-Money Laundering activities that they are ostensibly trying to prevent by bringing this Bill do not actually apply to the Non-Governmental Organisations or Private Voluntary Organisations whose activities or existence is threatened by the passing of this Bill. Yes, I heard the Hon. Minister loudly and clearly saying that NGOs should not fear. I have heard the contributions from my colleagues on your right but when you look closely at what they have been saying, and what has been said outside this august House, for instance by Mr. Chris Mutsvangwa relating to Private Voluntary Organisations, you can then discern, and clearly identify what the real intention is. My submission Mr. Speaker Sir is that it is not necessary to bring in this Bill because among other things, we have adequate laws that can deal with issues of money laundering – we already have those in place, and there is no need to add any further laws. Secondly, we do not have a serious problem at present, of organisations that are being funded from outside, that are carrying out any terrorist activities. Even if we had Mr. Speaker, we have adequate laws – we have the Criminal Code, it can deal with those issues. At the end of the day, it is my respectful submission that we do not need this piece of legislation. I read the report of the Portfolio Committee. It is very clear Mr. Speaker that we have a polarized society, but we must also ask ourselves, why are civil society organisations concerned about this particular Bill? It is because of the excessive powers that are intended to be given to the Minister of Public Service, Labour and Social Welfare in terms of registration and even affecting organisations that are not currently affected by the current PVO Act. You are having virtually a retrospective application of the law because even those organisations that are already in existence are actually threatened if this Bill were to be passed into law. I want to implore Hon. Members across the political divide, to put the interest of the nation first and not partisan political interests. I read the claim that a lot of our organisations are delving in political activity. When you look at Clause 5, it is a very dangerous provision which can be abused. When we are talking of political lobbying, when we are talking of opposing or supporting a political party – that clause is just too wide. It can be interpreted in any manner that anyone wants to use it to suppress or deregister civil society organisations because when we say involvement in political activities, what does it mean? Let us look at issues or problems that are bedeviling the country. We have got serious problems in terms of human rights, and that is why we enshrined in our Constitution provisions enabling institutions to be set up and in particular, I want to refer to the Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission. The Zimbabwe Human Rights Commission has tabled reports in this august House that speak to matters, incidents where there have been no observance of human rights and this is an independent body. I am not going to quote other sources of information. I want to confine ourselves to our own institution, and because we have such problems, you will find that there are civil society organisations that are involved in governance issues.