Van die Neandertal-mens is daar komplete skelette gevind. Hier staan ons dus op vaster grond. Maar die Neanderthal-mens is dan ook werklik (De Gereformeerde Vaandel, September 1952, pp 155-167) mens, selfs nie eens (De Gereformeerde Vaandel, September 1952, pp 155-167) aparte soort mens nie. Prof Kollman van Basel konstateer: 'There is in my view a probability that the retreating forehead and the projecting orbital ridges of the Neanderthal group perhaps belong to the category phenomena which must indicate individual variations of Homo sapiens ... In the far- distant continent of Australia just as strongly marked orbital ridges and retreating brows are to be found as in the skulls of the Neanderthal-Spy group. Spencer and Gillamm give the portrait of an Australian whose retreating and strongly marked orbital ridges are clearly like those of the Neanderthals ... The projecting orbital ridges and the retreating brows of the Neanderthal-Spy group are extreme forms of variability in the white races of Homo sapiens, but are no marks of a special race.' Dr Wright skryf in sy Man of the Glacial Period: 'Upon extending enquiries it was found that the Neanderthal type of skull is one which has representatives in all nations.' En les bes, prof Keith verklaar: 'The Spy men were typical representatives of the Neanderthal species, with large, robust skulls, holding brains, which, in point of size, were above the average of the modern European.'

Wat die Cro-Magnon-mens betref, is wetenskaplikes unaniem dat hy ook werkik (De Gereformeerde Vaandel, September 1952, pp 155-167) mens was. HF Osborn praat selfs van hom as (De Gereformeerde Vaandel, September 1952, pp 155-167) voortreflike ras van Homo sapiens . Hy sou gedeeltelik gelyktydig met die Neanderthal- mens gedrurende die Pleistoceen geleef het. Interessant is dit om hiermee in verband te stel wat prof Van der Vlerk in Ensie, V, verklaar: 'Vrij algemeen neemt men tegenwoordig aan, dat het jaartal 8000 v.Ch. ten naasten bij als het einde van het Pleistoceen .... kan gelden.' Dus, die fabelagtige geologiese tydperk krimp reeds merkwaardig vinnig in.

Hoe langer (De Gereformeerde Vaandel, September 1952, pp 155-167) mens jou verdiep in hierdie sake hoe vaster word die oortuiging dat ook die immanente getuienis die een feit bevestig, naamlik die konstantheid van die een en unieke menslike ras waarvan die Skrif spreek ; en dat die omgekeerde dan ook waar is, naamlik dat die transmutasiedogma van die evolusioniste op geen vaste pylers rus nie. (De Gereformeerde Vaandel, September 1952, pp 155-167) Mens kan nie nalaat nie om ook nog die volgende uitspraak van die soöloog Douglas Dewar en die geoloog Davies aan te haal, wat etlike jare gelde in The nineteenth Century and After verskyn het: 'Almost as discreditable as Dr Dubois' performance is the failure of nearly every recent book (excepting Keith's) dealing with human and other primate fossils, to mention the fact that a number of fossil remains of men of modern type - e.g., the Castendolo and Calaveras skulls, etc. - have been found in deposits of much earlier date than any which contain the fossils of the creatures commonly cited by evolutionists as ape-men, near-men, etc, such as Pithecanthrous , Pekin man, Piltdown man, Heidelberg man, Neanderthal man, Rhodesian man, etc. The only reason for rejecting the evidence of the far greater antiquity of the perfectly human Calaveras, etc, remains is that it does not suit the current obsession. As Keith frankly says: 'Indeed, were such discoveries in accordance with our expectations, if they were in harmony with the theories we have formed regarding the date of man's evolution, no one would ever dream of doubting them, much less of rejecting them.'' En dan is dit nie bevreemdend nie dat die Leidse hoogleraar, dr HJ Lam, die evolusieleer in Ensie, VI , (De Gereformeerde Vaandel, September 1952, pp 155- 167) werkhipotese noem. Hy laat hom onder ander aldus uit: 'Die werkhypothese