ahmedfarazsyk/datasets-github-issues huggingface dataset:
Problematic rank after calling `split_dataset_by_node` twice
Author: yzhangcs
State: closed

### Describe the bug

I'm trying to split `IterableDataset` by `split_dataset_by_node`.
But when doing split on a already split dataset, the resulting `rank` is greater than `world_size`.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

Here is the minimal code for reproduction:
```py
>>> from datasets import load_dataset
>>> from datasets.distributed import split_dataset_by_node
>>> dataset = load_dataset('fla-hub/slimpajama-test', split='train', streaming=True)      
>>> dataset = split_dataset_by_node(dataset, 1, 32)
>>> dataset._distributed
DistributedConfig(rank=1, world_size=32)
>>> dataset = split_dataset_by_node(dataset, 1, 15)
>>> dataset._distributed                           
DistributedConfig(rank=481, world_size=480)
```
As you can see, the second rank 481 > 480, which is problematic.

### Expected behavior

I think this error comes from this line @lhoestq
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/a6ccf944e42c1a84de81bf326accab9999b86c90/src/datasets/iterable_dataset.py#L2943-L2944
We may need to obtain the rank first. Then the above code gives
```py
>>> dataset._distributed                           
DistributedConfig(rank=16, world_size=480)
```

### Environment info

datasets==2.20.0

Comments: ah yes good catch ! feel free to open a PR with your suggested fix
Convert polars DataFrame back to datasets
Author: ljw20180420
State: closed
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

This returns error.
```python
from datasets import Dataset

dsdf = Dataset.from_dict({"x": [[1, 2], [3, 4, 5]], "y": ["a", "b"]})
Dataset.from_polars(dsdf.to_polars())
```
ValueError: Arrow type large_list<item: int64> does not have a datasets dtype equivalent.

### Motivation

When datasets contain Sequence data type, it will be converted to Arrow type large_list. However, the reverse (from large_list to Sequence) does not work.

### Your contribution

No

Comments: Hi ! Thanks for reporting :)

We don't support `large_list` yet, though it should be added to `Sequence` IMO (maybe with a parameter `large=True` ?)
Support NumPy 2.0
Author: NeilGirdhar
State: closed
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

Support NumPy 2.0.

### Motivation

NumPy introduces the Array API, which bridges the gap between machine learning libraries.  Many clients of HuggingFace are eager to start using the Array API.

Besides that, NumPy 2 provides a cleaner interface than NumPy 1.

### Tasks

NumPy 2.0 was released for testing so that libraries could ensure compatibility [since mid-March](https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/24300#issuecomment-1986815755).  What needs to be done for HuggingFace to support Numpy 2?

- [x] Fix use of `array`: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/6976
- [ ] Remove [NumPy version limit](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/6975): https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/6991
IndexError during training with Squad dataset and T5-small model
Author: ramtunguturi36
State: closed

### Describe the bug

I am encountering an IndexError while training a T5-small model on the Squad dataset using the transformers and datasets libraries. The error occurs even with a minimal reproducible example, suggesting a potential bug or incompatibility.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1.Install the required libraries: !pip install transformers datasets
2.Run the following code:
!pip install transformers datasets

import torch
from transformers import AutoTokenizer, AutoModelForSeq2SeqLM, TrainingArguments, Trainer, DataCollatorWithPadding

# Load a small, publicly available dataset
from datasets import load_dataset
dataset = load_dataset("squad", split="train[:100]") # Use a small subset for testing

# Load a pre-trained model and tokenizer
model_name = "t5-small"
tokenizer = AutoTokenizer.from_pretrained(model_name)
model = AutoModelForSeq2SeqLM.from_pretrained(model_name)

# Define a basic data collator
data_collator = DataCollatorWithPadding(tokenizer=tokenizer)

# Define training arguments
training_args = TrainingArguments(
    output_dir="./results",
    per_device_train_batch_size=2,
    num_train_epochs=1,
)

# Create a trainer
trainer = Trainer(
    model=model,
    args=training_args,
    train_dataset=dataset,
    data_collator=data_collator,
)

# Train the model
trainer.train()

### Expected behavior

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
IndexError                                Traceback (most recent call last)
[<ipython-input-23-f13a4b23c001>](https://localhost:8080/#) in <cell line: 34>()
     32 
     33 # Train the model
---> 34 trainer.train()

10 frames
[/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/datasets/formatting/formatting.py](https://localhost:8080/#) in _check_valid_index_key(key, size)
    427     if isinstance(key, int):
    428         if (key < 0 and key + size < 0) or (key >= size):
--> 429             raise IndexError(f"Invalid key: {key} is out of bounds for size {size}")
    430         return
    431     elif isinstance(key, slice):

IndexError: Invalid key: 42 is out of bounds for size 0

### Environment info

transformers version:4.41.2
datasets version:1.18.4
Python version:3.10.12


Comments: add remove_unused_columns=False to training_args
https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/6535#issuecomment-1874024704

Closing this issue because it was a reported and fixed in transformers.
Method to load Laion400m
Author: humanely
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

Large datasets like Laion400m are provided as embeddings. The provided methods in load_dataset are not straightforward for loading embedding files, i.e. img_emb_XX.npy ; XX = 0 to 99


### Motivation

The trial and experimentation is the key pivot of HF. It would be great if HF can load embeddings files s,ealessly.

### Your contribution

I cam write the loader with some help.
Manual downloads should count as downloads
Author: umarbutler
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

I would like to request that manual downloads of data files from Hugging Face dataset repositories count as downloads of a dataset. According to the documentation for the Hugging Face Hub, that is currently not the case: https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/datasets-download-stats

### Motivation

This would ensure that downloads are accurately reported to end users.

### Your contribution

N/A

Comments: We're unlikely to add more features/support for datasets with python loading scripts, which include datasets with manual download. Sorry for the inconvenience
My Private Dataset doesn't exist on the Hub or cannot be accessed
Author: wangguan1995
State: closed

### Describe the bug


```
  File "/root/miniconda3/envs/gino_conda/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/load.py", line 1852, in dataset_module_factory
    raise DatasetNotFoundError(msg + f" at revision '{revision}'" if revision else msg)
datasets.exceptions.DatasetNotFoundError: Dataset 'xxx' doesn't exist on the Hub or cannot be accessed
>>> dataset = load_dataset("xxxx", token=True)

404 error 404 Client Error. (Request ID: Root=xxxx)

Repository Not Found for url: https://huggingface.co/api/datasets/xxx/xxx.
Please make sure you specified the correct `repo_id` and `repo_type`.
If you are trying to access a private or gated repo, make sure you are authenticated.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/root/miniconda3/envs/gino_conda/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/load.py", line 2593, in load_dataset
    builder_instance = load_dataset_builder(
  File "/root/miniconda3/envs/gino_conda/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/load.py", line 2265, in load_dataset_builder
    dataset_module = dataset_module_factory(
  File "/root/miniconda3/envs/gino_conda/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/load.py", line 1910, in dataset_module_factory
    raise e1 from None
  File "/root/miniconda3/envs/gino_conda/lib/python3.9/site-packages/datasets/load.py", line 1852, in dataset_module_factory
    raise DatasetNotFoundError(msg + f" at revision '{revision}'" if revision else msg)
datasets.exceptions.DatasetNotFoundError: Dataset 'xxx' doesn't exist on the Hub or cannot be accessed
```

### Steps to reproduce the bug

123

### Expected behavior

123

### Environment info

123

Comments: I can load public dataset, but for my private dataset it fails

https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/upload_dataset

I have checked the API HTTP link. Repository Not Found for url: https://huggingface.co/api/datasets/xxx/xxx.

![image](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/39621324/4aceef59-0c65-4161-9665-676d25d73225)

It just works fine.

It seems that everything is in a mass huh....

![image](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/assets/39621324/fb2fe12c-4f0a-4bf6-9656-63ba50347b10)


https://huggingface.co/datasets/rajpurkar/squad/blob/main/squad.py fails again

https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/main/templates/new_dataset_script.py#L81 can not use this, too complex. I just need a def to load my file to a dict

I am facing the same issue. Did you find a fix?

You should authenticate to be able to access private or gated repos: https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/datasets-gated#access-gated-datasets-as-a-user
`Dataset.with_format` behaves inconsistently with documentation
Author: iansheng
State: closed
Labels: name: documentation

### Describe the bug

The actual behavior of the interface `Dataset.with_format` is inconsistent with the documentation.
https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/use_with_pytorch#n-dimensional-arrays
https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/v2.19.0/en/use_with_tensorflow#n-dimensional-arrays

> If your dataset consists of N-dimensional arrays, you will see that by default they are considered as nested lists.
> In particular, a PyTorch formatted dataset outputs nested lists instead of a single tensor.
> A TensorFlow formatted dataset outputs a RaggedTensor instead of a single tensor.

But I get a single tensor by default, which is  inconsistent with the description.

Actually the current behavior seems more reasonable to me. Therefore, the document needs to be modified.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
>>> from datasets import Dataset
>>> data = [[[1, 2],[3, 4]],[[5, 6],[7, 8]]]
>>> ds = Dataset.from_dict({"data": data})
>>> ds = ds.with_format("torch")
>>> ds[0]
{'data': tensor([[1, 2],
        [3, 4]])}
>>> ds = ds.with_format("tf")
>>> ds[0]
{'data': <tf.Tensor: shape=(2, 2), dtype=int64, numpy=
array([[1, 2],
       [3, 4]])>}
```

### Expected behavior

```python
>>> from datasets import Dataset
>>> data = [[[1, 2],[3, 4]],[[5, 6],[7, 8]]]
>>> ds = Dataset.from_dict({"data": data})
>>> ds = ds.with_format("torch")
>>> ds[0]
{'data': [tensor([1, 2]), tensor([3, 4])]}
>>> ds = ds.with_format("tf")
>>> ds[0]
{'data': <tf.RaggedTensor [[1, 2], [3, 4]]>}
```

### Environment info

datasets==2.19.1
torch==2.1.0
tensorflow==2.13.1

Comments: Hi ! It seems the documentation was outdated in this paragraph

I fixed it here: https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/6956

Fixed.
load_dataset error
Author: frederichen01
State: closed

### Describe the bug

Why does the program get stuck when I use load_dataset method, and it still gets stuck after loading for several hours? In fact, my json file is only 21m, and I can load it in one go using open('', 'r').

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. pip install datasets==2.19.2
2. from datasets import Dataset, DatasetDict, NamedSplit, Split, load_dataset
3. data = load_dataset('json', data_files='train.json')

### Expected behavior

It is able to load my json correctly

### Environment info

datasets==2.19.2

Comments: Hi, @lion-ops.

In our Continuous Integration we have many tests on loading JSON files and all of them work properly.

Could you please share your "train.json" file, so that we can try to reproduce the issue you have? 

> Hi, @lion-ops.
> 
> In our Continuous Integration we have many tests on loading JSON files and all of them work properly.
> 
> Could you please share your "train.json" file, so that we can try to reproduce the issue you have?

Thank you for your reply. I can load it normally in another server. Is it possible that the disk of my server is a network disk in the LAN, so it will be downloaded from the LAN and get stuck?
to_tf_dataset: Visible devices cannot be modified after being initialized
Author: logasja
State: open

### Describe the bug

When trying to use to_tf_dataset with a custom data_loader collate_fn when I use parallelism I am met with the following error as many times as number of workers there were in ``num_workers``.

  File "/opt/miniconda/envs/env/lib/python3.11/site-packages/multiprocess/process.py", line 314, in _bootstrap
    self.run()
  File "/opt/miniconda/envs/env/lib/python3.11/site-packages/multiprocess/process.py", line 108, in run
    self._target(*self._args, **self._kwargs)
  File "/opt/miniconda/envs/env/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasets/utils/tf_utils.py", line 438, in worker_loop
    tf.config.set_visible_devices([], "GPU")  # Make sure workers don't try to allocate GPU memory
    ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/opt/miniconda/envs/env/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tensorflow/python/framework/config.py", line 566, in set_visible_devices
    context.context().set_visible_devices(devices, device_type)
  File "/opt/miniconda/envs/env/lib/python3.11/site-packages/tensorflow/python/eager/context.py", line 1737, in set_visible_devices
    raise RuntimeError(
RuntimeError: Visible devices cannot be modified after being initialized

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. Download a dataset using HuggingFace load_dataset
2. Define a function that transforms the data in some way to be used in the collate_fn argument
3. Provide a ``batch_size`` and ``num_workers`` value in the ``to_tf_dataset`` function
4. Either retrieve directly or use tfds benchmark to test the dataset

``` python
from datasets import load_datasets
import tensorflow_datasets as tfds
from keras_cv.layers import Resizing

def data_loader(examples):
      x = Resizing(examples[0]['image'], 256, 256, crop_to_aspect_ratio=True)
      return {X[0]: x}

ds = load_datasets("logasja/FDF", split="test")

ds = ds.to_tf_dataset(collate_fn=data_loader, batch_size=16, num_workers=2)

tfds.benchmark(ds)
```

### Expected behavior

Use multiple processes to apply transformations from the collate_fn to the tf dataset on the CPU.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.19.1
- Platform: Linux-6.5.0-1023-oracle-x86_64-with-glibc2.35
- Python version: 3.11.8
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.22.2
- PyArrow version: 15.0.2
- Pandas version: 2.2.1
- `fsspec` version: 2024.2.0
Import sorting is disabled by flake8 noqa directive after switching to ruff linter
Author: albertvillanova
State: closed
Labels: name: maintenance

When we switched to `ruff` linter in PR:
- #5519

import sorting was disabled in all files containing the `# flake8: noqa` directive
- https://github.com/astral-sh/ruff/issues/11679

We should re-enable import sorting on those files.
Enable Sharding to Equal Sized Shards
Author: yuvalkirstain
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

Add an option when sharding a dataset to have all shards the same size. Will be good to provide both an option of duplication, and by truncation.

### Motivation

Currently the behavior of sharding is "If n % i == l, then the first l shards will have length (n // i) + 1, and the remaining shards will have length (n // i).". However, when using FSDP we want the shards to have the same size. This requires the user to manually handle this situation, but it will be nice if we had an option to shard the dataset into equally sized shards. 

### Your contribution

For now just a PR. I can also add code that does what is needed, but probably not efficient.
Shard to equal size by duplication:
```
remainder = len(dataset) % num_shards
num_missing_examples = num_shards - remainder
duplicated = dataset.select(list(range(num_missing_examples)))
dataset = concatenate_datasets([dataset, duplicated])
shard = dataset.shard(num_shards, shard_idx)
```
Or by truncation:
```
shard = dataset.shard(num_shards, shard_idx)
num_examples_per_shard = len(dataset) // num_shards
shard = shard.select(list(range(num_examples_per_shard)))
```
ExpectedMoreSplits error when using data_dir
Author: albertvillanova
State: closed
Labels: name: bug

As reported by @regisss, an `ExpectedMoreSplits` error is raised when passing `data_dir`:
```python
from datasets import load_dataset

dataset = load_dataset(
    "lvwerra/stack-exchange-paired",
    split="train",
    cache_dir=None,
    data_dir="data/rl",
)
```
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/datasets/load.py", line 2609, in load_dataset
    builder_instance.download_and_prepare(
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1027, in download_and_prepare
    self._download_and_prepare(
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/datasets/builder.py", line 1140, in _download_and_prepare
    verify_splits(self.info.splits, split_dict)
  File "/usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/datasets/utils/info_utils.py", line 92, in verify_splits
    raise ExpectedMoreSplits(str(set(expected_splits) - set(recorded_splits)))
datasets.utils.info_utils.ExpectedMoreSplits: {'test'}
```
save_to_disk() freezes when saving on s3 bucket with multiprocessing
Author: ycattan
State: open

### Describe the bug

I'm trying to save a `Dataset` using the `save_to_disk()` function with:
- `num_proc > 1`
- `dataset_path` being a s3 bucket path e.g. "s3://{bucket_name}/{dataset_folder}/"

The hf progress bar shows up but the saving does not seem to start. 
When using one processor only (`num_proc=1`), everything works fine.
When saving the dataset on local disk (as opposed to s3 bucket) with `num_proc > 1`, everything works fine.

Thank you for your help! :)

### Steps to reproduce the bug

I tried without any storage options:

```
from datasets import load_dataset

sandbox_ds = load_dataset("openai_humaneval")
sandbox_ds["test"].save_to_disk(
    "s3://bucket-name/test_multiprocessing_saving/",
    num_proc=4,
)
```


and with the specific s3fs storage options: 
```
from datasets import load_dataset
from s3fs import S3FileSystem

def get_s3fs():
    return S3FileSystem()

sandbox_ds = load_dataset("openai_humaneval")
sandbox_ds["test"].save_to_disk(
    "s3://bucket-name/test_multiprocessing_saving/",
    num_proc=4,
    storage_options=get_s3fs().storage_options, # also tried: storage_options=S3FileSystem().storage_options
)
```

I'm guessing I might use `storage_options` parameter wrongly, but I didn't find anything online that made it work.

**NB**: Behavior is the same when trying to save the whole `DatasetDict`.

### Expected behavior

Progress bar fills in and saving is carried out.

### Environment info

`datasets==2.18.0`

Comments: I got the same issue. Any updates so far for this issue?

Same here. Any updates?

+1, experiencing this as well
Support for pathlib.Path in datasets 2.19.0
Author: lamyiowce
State: open

### Describe the bug

After the recent update of `datasets`, Dataset.save_to_disk does not accept a pathlib.Path anymore. It was supported in 2.18.0 and previous versions. Is this intentional? Was it supported before only because of a Python dusk-typing miracle?

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```
from datasets import Dataset
import pathlib

path = pathlib.Path("./my_out_path")
Dataset.from_dict(
    {"text": ["hello world"], "label": [777], "split": ["train"]}
.save_to_disk(path)
```
This results in an error when using datasets 2.19:
```
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "<stdin>", line 3, in <module>
  File "/Users/jb/scratch/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/datasets/arrow_dataset.py", line 1515, in save_to_disk
    fs, _ = url_to_fs(dataset_path, **(storage_options or {}))
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/jb/scratch/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fsspec/core.py", line 383, in url_to_fs
    chain = _un_chain(url, kwargs)
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  File "/Users/jb/scratch/venv/lib/python3.11/site-packages/fsspec/core.py", line 323, in _un_chain
    if "::" in path
       ^^^^^^^^^^^^
TypeError: argument of type 'PosixPath' is not iterable
```

Converting to str works, however.
```
Dataset.from_dict(
     {"text": ["hello world"], "label": [777], "split": ["train"]}
).save_to_disk(str(path))
```

### Expected behavior

My dataset gets saved to disk without an error.

### Environment info

aiohttp==3.9.5
aiosignal==1.3.1
attrs==23.2.0
certifi==2024.2.2
charset-normalizer==3.3.2
datasets==2.19.0
dill==0.3.8
filelock==3.14.0
frozenlist==1.4.1
fsspec==2024.3.1
huggingface-hub==0.23.2
idna==3.7
multidict==6.0.5
multiprocess==0.70.16
numpy==1.26.4
packaging==24.0
pandas==2.2.2
pyarrow==16.1.0
pyarrow-hotfix==0.6
python-dateutil==2.9.0.post0
pytz==2024.1
PyYAML==6.0.1
requests==2.32.3
six==1.16.0
tqdm==4.66.4
typing_extensions==4.12.0
tzdata==2024.1
urllib3==2.2.1
xxhash==3.4.1
yarl==1.9.4

Comments: +1 I just noticed this when I tried to update `datasets` today.

The same issue, I also get error.
ValueError: Couldn't infer the same data file format for all splits. Got {'train': ('json', {}), 'validation': (None, {})}
Author: Polarisamoon
State: open

### Describe the bug

When I run the code en = load_dataset("allenai/c4", "en", streaming=True), I encounter an error: raise ValueError(f"Couldn't infer the same data file format for all splits. Got {split_modules}") ValueError: Couldn't infer the same data file format for all splits. Got {'train': ('json', {}), 'validation': (None, {})}.
However, running dataset = load_dataset('allenai/c4', streaming=True, data_files={'validation': 'en/c4-validation.00003-of-00008.json.gz'}, split='validation') works fine. What is the issue here?

### Steps to reproduce the bug

run code：
import os
os.environ['HF_ENDPOINT'] = 'https://hf-mirror.com'
from datasets import load_dataset

en = load_dataset("allenai/c4", "en", streaming=True)

### Expected behavior

Successfully loaded the dataset.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 2.18.0
- Platform: Linux-6.5.0-28-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.17
- Python version: 3.8.19
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.22.2
- PyArrow version: 15.0.2
- Pandas version: 2.0.3
- `fsspec` version: 2024.2.0


Comments: How do you solve it ?


> How do you solve it ?

Please check your Python environment and dataset version. I have just resolved the issue, which was caused by a Python environment switching error
Avoid downloading the whole dataset when only README.me has been touched on hub.
Author: zinc75
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

`datasets.load_dataset()` triggers a new download of the **whole dataset** when the README.md file has been touched on huggingface hub, even if data files / parquet files are the exact same.

I think the current behaviour of the load_dataset function is triggered whenever a change of the hash of latest commit on huggingface hub, but  is there a clever way to only download again the dataset **if and only if** data is modified ?  

### Motivation

The current behaviour is a waste of network bandwidth / disk space / research time.

### Your contribution

I don't have time to submit a PR, but I hope a simple solution will emerge from this issue ! 

Comments: you're right, we're tackling this here: https://github.com/huggingface/dataset-viewer/issues/2757

@severo : great !