ahmedfarazsyk/datasets-github-issues huggingface dataset:
Incompatibile dill version (0.3.9) in datasets 2.18.0 - 3.5.0
Author: JGrel
State: closed

### Describe the bug

Datasets 2.18.0 - 3.5.0 has a dependency on dill < 0.3.9. This causes errors with dill >= 0.3.9.

Could you please take a look into it and make it compatible?

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. Install setuptools >= 2.18.0
2. Install dill >=0.3.9
3. Run pip check
4. Output:
ERROR: pip's dependency resolver does not currently take into account all the packages that are installed. This behaviour is the source of the following dependency conflicts.
datasets 2.18.0 requires dill<0.3.9,>=0.3.0, but you have dill 0.3.9 which is incompatible.

### Expected behavior

Pip install both libraries without any errors

### Environment info

Datasets version: 2.18 - 3.5
Python: 3.11

Comments: Hi ! We can bump `dill` to 0.3.9 if we make sure it's deterministic and doesn't break the caching mechanism in `datasets`.

Would you be interested in opening a PR ? Then we can run the CI to see if it works

Hi!. Yeah I can do it. Should I make any changes besides dill versions?

There are probably some usage of internal functions from `dill` that we'll need to update in `datasets`

If you run `pytest tests/test_fingerprint.py` you should already have a good idea of what works and what doesn't.
But feel free to open a PR anyway, this way we can run the full CI and see the results


Hi, sorry for no response from my side. I will try to do it today.

Created pull request: [LINK](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/pull/7535)
Tried to run tests by using command you have send and got few errors:

![Image](https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/acbf1feb-4dd1-416e-a118-c91abe0d188b)

Thanks for running the test ! So it appears we have two issues to fix:
1. 'log' is not defined: it seems an internal `dill` function has disappeared, so we should adapt the `datasets` code that was using it
2. there are some hashes mismatches, which means `dill` doesn't seem to output the same dump when passed the same ipython function twice, or the same function but located at a different line in a python file
Iterating over Image feature columns is extremely slow
Author: sohamparikh
State: open

We are trying to load datasets where the image column stores `PIL.PngImagePlugin.PngImageFile` images. However, iterating over these datasets is extremely slow. 
What I have found:
1. It is the presence of the image column that causes the slowdown. Removing the column from the dataset results in blazingly fast (as expected) times
2. It is ~2x faster to iterate when the column contains a single image as opposed to a list of images i.e., the feature is a Sequence of Image objects. We often need multiple images per sample, so we need to work with a list of images
3. It is ~17x faster to store paths to PNG files and load them using `PIL.Image.open`, as opposed to iterating over a `Dataset` with an Image column, and ~30x faster compared to `Sequence` of `Image`s. See a simple script below with an openly available dataset.


It would be great to understand the standard practices for storing and loading multimodal datasets (image + text). 

https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/en/image_load seems a bit underdeveloped? (e.g., `dataset.decode` only works with `IterableDataset`, but it's not clear from the doc)

Thanks!

```python
from datasets import load_dataset, load_from_disk
from PIL import Image
from pathlib import Path

ds = load_dataset("getomni-ai/ocr-benchmark")

for idx, sample in enumerate(ds["test"]):
    image = sample["image"]
    image.save(f"/tmp/ds_files/images/image_{idx}.png")

ds.save_to_disk("/tmp/ds_columns")

# Remove the 'image' column
ds["test"] = ds["test"].remove_columns(["image"])

# Create image paths for each sample
image_paths = [f"images/image_{idx}.png" for idx in range(len(ds["test"]))]

# Add the 'image_path' column to the dataset
ds["test"] = ds["test"].add_column("image_path", image_paths)

# Save the updated dataset
ds.save_to_disk("/tmp/ds_files")
files_path = Path("/tmp/ds_files")
column_path = Path("/tmp/ds_columns")

# load and benchmark
ds_file = load_from_disk(files_path)
ds_column = load_from_disk(column_path)
import time


images_files = []
start = time.time()
for idx in range(len(ds_file["test"])):
    image_path = files_path / ds_file["test"][idx]["image_path"]
    image = Image.open(image_path)
    images_files.append(image)
end = time.time()
print(f"Time taken to load images from files: {end - start} seconds")

# Time taken to load images from files: 1.2364635467529297 seconds


images_column = []
start = time.time()
for idx in range(len(ds_column["test"])):
    images_column.append(ds_column["test"][idx]["image"])
end = time.time()
print(f"Time taken to load images from columns: {end - start} seconds")

# Time taken to load images from columns: 20.49347186088562 seconds
```

Comments: Hi ! Could it be because the `Image()` type in dataset does `image  = Image.open(image_path)` and also `image.load()` which actually loads the image data in memory ? This is needed to avoid too many open files issues, see https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/issues/3985

Yes, that seems to be it. For my purposes, I've cast the column to `Image(decode=False)`, and only load the images when necessary, which is much much faster
Front-end statistical data quantity deviation
Author: rangehow
State: open

### Describe the bug

While browsing the dataset at https://huggingface.co/datasets/NeuML/wikipedia-20250123, I noticed that a dataset with nearly 7M entries was estimated to be only 4M in size—almost half the actual amount. According to the post-download loading and the dataset_info (https://huggingface.co/datasets/NeuML/wikipedia-20250123/blob/main/train/dataset_info.json), the true data volume is indeed close to 7M. This significant discrepancy could mislead users when sorting datasets by row count. Why not directly retrieve this information from dataset_info?

Not sure if this is the right place to report this bug, but leaving it here for the team's awareness.

Comments: Hi ! the format of this dataset is not supported by the Dataset Viewer. It looks like this dataset was saved using `save_to_disk()` which is meant for local storage / easy reload without compression, not for sharing online.
`load_dataset` of size 40GB creates a cache of >720GB
Author: pietrolesci
State: closed

Hi there,

I am trying to load a dataset from the Hugging Face Hub and split it into train and validation splits. Somehow, when I try to do it with `load_dataset`, it exhausts my disk quota. So, I tried manually downloading the parquet files from the hub and loading them as follows:

```python
 ds = DatasetDict(
        {
            "train": load_dataset(
                "parquet", 
                data_dir=f"{local_dir}/{tok}", 
                cache_dir=cache_dir, 
                num_proc=min(12, os.cpu_count()),   # type: ignore
                split=ReadInstruction("train", from_=0, to=NUM_TRAIN, unit="abs"),  # type: ignore
            ),
            "validation": load_dataset(
                "parquet", 
                data_dir=f"{local_dir}/{tok}", 
                cache_dir=cache_dir, 
                num_proc=min(12, os.cpu_count()),   # type: ignore
                split=ReadInstruction("train", from_=NUM_TRAIN, unit="abs"),  # type: ignore
            )
        }
    )

```

which still strangely creates 720GB of cache. In addition, if I remove the raw parquet file folder (`f"{local_dir}/{tok}"` in this example), I am not able to load anything. So, I am left wondering what this cache is doing. Am I missing something? Is there a solution to this problem?

Thanks a lot in advance for your help!

A related issue: https://github.com/huggingface/transformers/issues/10204#issue-809007443.

---

Python: 3.11.11
datasets: 3.5.0


Comments: Hi ! Parquet is a compressed format. When you load a dataset, it uncompresses the Parquet data into Arrow data on your disk. That's why you can indeed end up with 720GB of uncompressed data on disk. The uncompression is needed to enable performant dataset objects (especially for random access).

To save some storage you can instead load the dataset with `streaming=True`. This way you get an `IterableDataset` that reads the Parquet data iteratively without ever writing to disk.

PS: `ReadInstruction` might not be implemented for `streaming=True`, if it's the case you can use `ds.take()` and `ds.skip()` instead

Hi @lhoestq, thanks a lot for your answer. This makes perfect sense. I will try using the streaming mode. Closing the issue.
Nested Feature raises ArrowNotImplementedError: Unsupported cast using function cast_struct
Author: yaner-here
State: closed

### Describe the bug

`datasets.Features` seems to be unable to handle json file that contains fields of `list[dict]`.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```json
// test.json
{"a": 1, "b": [{"c": 2, "d": 3}, {"c": 4, "d": 5}]}
{"a": 5, "b": [{"c": 7, "d": 8}, {"c": 9, "d": 10}]}
```

```python
import json
from datasets import Dataset, Features, Value, Sequence, load_dataset

annotation_feature = Features({
    "a": Value("int32"),
    "b": Sequence({
        "c": Value("int32"),
        "d": Value("int32"),
    }),
})
annotation_dataset = load_dataset(
    "json", 
    data_files="test.json",
    features=annotation_feature
)
```

```
ArrowNotImplementedError: Unsupported cast from list<item: struct<c: int32, d: int32>> to struct using function cast_struct

The above exception was the direct cause of the following exception:

DatasetGenerationError                    Traceback (most recent call last)
Cell In[46], line 11
      2 from datasets import Dataset, Features, Value, Sequence, load_dataset
      4 annotation_feature = Features({
      5     "a": Value("int32"),
      6     "b": Sequence({
   (...)      9     }),
     10 })
---> 11 annotation_dataset = load_dataset(
     12     "json", 
     13     data_files="test.json",
     14     features=annotation_feature
     15 )
```

### Expected behavior

A `datasets.Datasets` instance should be initialized.

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 3.5.0
- Platform: Linux-6.11.0-21-generic-x86_64-with-glibc2.39
- Python version: 3.11.11
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.30.1
- PyArrow version: 19.0.1
- Pandas version: 2.2.3
- `fsspec` version: 2024.12.0

Comments: Solved by the default `load_dataset(features)` parameters. Do not use `Sequence` for the `list` in `list[any]` json schema, just simply use `[]`. For example, `"b": Sequence({...})` fails but `"b": [{...}]` works fine.
Make `with_format` correctly indicate that a `Dataset` is compatible with PyTorch's `Dataset` class
Author: benglewis
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

Currently `datasets` does not correctly indicate to the Python type-checker (e.g. `pyright` / `Pylance`) that the output of `with_format` is compatible with PyTorch's `Dataloader` since it does not indicate that the HuggingFace `Dataset` is compatible with the PyTorch `Dataset` class. It would be great if we could get the typing to work nicely.

### Motivation

To avoid casting types in our Python code.

### Your contribution

I would be happy to contribute a PR if this is something that may be accepted and could work with the current approach.
This doesn't have to be for just PyTorch, but I imagine that the same thing would be useful for `tensorflow` and such, but we only have a need for PyTorch at this stage.

Comments: Does the torch `DataLoader` really require the dataset to be a subclass of `torch.utils.data.Dataset` ? Or is there a simpler type we could use ?

PS: also note that a dataset without `with_format()` can also be used in a torch `DataLoader` . Calling `with_format("torch")` simply makes the output of the dataset torch Tensors in an efficient way.
Extreme memory bandwidth.
Author: J0SZ
State: open

### Describe the bug

When I use hf datasets on 4 GPU with 40 workers I get some extreme memory bandwidth of constant ~3GB/s. 

However, if I wrap the dataset in `IterableDataset`, this issue is gone and the data also loads way faster (4x faster training on 1 worker).

It seems like the workers don't share memory and basically duplicate the data 4x40.



### Steps to reproduce the bug

Trainer arguments:
```
    dataloader_pin_memory=True,
    dataloader_num_workers=40,
    dataloader_prefetch_factor=2,
    dataloader_persistent_workers=True,
```
Call trainer:
```
trainer = Trainer(
    model=model,
    args=train_args,
    train_dataset=load_from_disk('..').with_fromat('torch'),
)
```
The dataset has 600GB and consists of 1225 files.

### Expected behavior

The optimal bandwidth should be 100MB/s to keep up with GPU.

### Environment info

Linux
Python 3.11
datasets==3.2.0
How to convert videos to images?
Author: Loki-Lu
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

Does someone know how to return the images from videos?

### Motivation

I am trying to use openpi(https://github.com/Physical-Intelligence/openpi) to finetune my Lerobot dataset(V2.0 and V2.1). I find that although the codedaset is v2.0, they are different. It seems like Lerobot V2.0 has two version, one is data include images infos and another one is separate to data and videos.

Does someone know how to return the images from videos?





Comments: Hi ! there is some documentation here on how to read video frames: https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/video_load
Json builder: Allow features to override problematic Arrow types
Author: edmcman
State: open
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

In the JSON builder, use explicitly requested feature types before or while converting to Arrow.

### Motivation

Working with JSON datasets is really hard because of Arrow.  At the very least, it seems like it should be possible to work-around these problems by explicitly setting problematic columns's types.  But it seems like this is not possible because the features are only used *after* converting to arrow.

Here's a simple example where the Arrow error could potentially be avoided by converting the column to a string: https://colab.research.google.com/drive/16QHRdbUwKSrpwVfGwu8V8AHr8v2dv0dt?usp=sharing

### Your contribution

Maybe with some guidance.  I'm not very familiar with arrow or pandas.

Comments: Hi ! It would be cool indeed, currently the JSON data are generally loaded here: 

https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/90e5bf8a8599b625d6103ee5ac83b98269991141/src/datasets/packaged_modules/json/json.py#L137-L140

Maybe we can pass a Arrow `schema` to avoid errors ?
Columns in the dataset obtained though load_dataset do not correspond to the one in the dataset viewer since 3.4.0
Author: bruno-hays
State: closed

### Describe the bug

I have noticed that on my dataset named [BrunoHays/Accueil_UBS](https://huggingface.co/datasets/BrunoHays/Accueil_UBS), since the version 3.4.0, every column except audio is missing when I load the dataset.

Interestingly, the dataset viewer still shows the correct columns

### Steps to reproduce the bug

```python
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("BrunoHays/Accueil_UBS", streaming=True)
print(next(iter(ds["test"])).keys())
```
With datasets >= 3.4.0: 
-> dict_keys(['audio'])
With datasets == 3.3.2:
-> dict_keys(['audio', 'id', 'speaker', 'sentence', 'raw_sentence', 'start_timestamp', 'end_timestamp', 'overlap'])


### Expected behavior

All the columns should be present

### Environment info

- `datasets` version: 3.3.2
- Platform: macOS-14.6.1-x86_64-i386-64bit
- Python version: 3.10.15
- `huggingface_hub` version: 0.30.1
- PyArrow version: 16.1.0
- Pandas version: 1.5.3
- `fsspec` version: 2023.10.0


Comments: Hi, the dataset viewer shows all the possible columns and their types, but `load_dataset()` iterates through all the columns that you defined. It seems that you only have one column (‘audio’) defined in your dataset because when I ran `print(ds.column_names)`, the only name I got was “audio”. You need to clearly define all the other features of the dataset as columns to enable your original code to work. Furthermore, you can run this code to print out all the features of your dataset: 
```python
from datasets import load_dataset_builder
ds_builder = load_dataset_builder("BrunoHays/Accueil_UBS")
print(ds_builder.info.features)
```


@phoebecd 
Good catch, even in datasets<3.4.0, the only feature is "audio".
This datasets follows the [audio folder](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/en/audio_dataset#audiofolder) structure with metadata.csv.
Maybe I missed something or there is a bug when having and audio_folder with a metadata file

What do you think @lhoestq ?

I opened a PR to fix the issue :) https://huggingface.co/datasets/BrunoHays/Accueil_UBS/discussions/2

We expect the metadata file to be in the <split>/ folder now to allow one CSV metadata file per split. But in the PR I just added a manual configuration instead of moving the file and updating all the relative paths it contains.
Broken links in pdf loading documentation
Author: VyoJ
State: closed

### Describe the bug

Hi, just a couple of small issues I ran into while reading the docs for [loading pdf data](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/document_load):

1. The link for the [`Create a pdf dataset`](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/document_load#pdffolder) points to https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/pdf_dataset instead of https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/document_dataset and hence gives a 404 error.

2. At the top of the page, it's mentioned that to work with pdf datasets we need to have the `pdfplumber` package installed but the link to its installation guide points to `pytorch/vision` [installation instructions](https://github.com/pytorch/vision#installation) instead of `pdfplumber`'s [guide](https://github.com/jsvine/pdfplumber#installation)

I love the work on enabling pdf dataset support and these small tweaks would help everyone navigate the docs better. Thanks!

### Steps to reproduce the bug

The issue is on the [Load Document Data](https://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/main/en/document_load) page of the datasets docs.

### Expected behavior

1. For solving the first issue, I went through the [source .mdx code](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/main/docs/source/document_load.mdx?plain=1#L188) of the datasets docs and found that the link is pointing to `./pdf_dataset` instead of `./document_dataset`

2. For the second issue, I went through the [source .mdx code](https://github.com/huggingface/datasets/blob/main/docs/source/document_load.mdx?plain=1#L13) of the datasets docs and found that the link is `pytorch/vision` [installation instructions](https://github.com/pytorch/vision#installation) instead of `pdfplumber`'s [guide](https://github.com/jsvine/pdfplumber#installation)

Just replacing these two links should fix the bugs

### Environment info

datasets v3.5.0 (main at the time of writing)

Comments: thanks for reporting ! I fixed the links, the docs will be updated in the next release
push_to_hub does not upload videos
Author: DominikVincent
State: open

### Describe the bug

Hello,

I would like to upload a video dataset (some .mp4 files and some segments within them), i.e. rows correspond to subsequences from videos. Videos might be referenced by several rows.

I created a dataset locally and it references the videos and the video readers can read them correctly. I use push_to_hub() to upload the dataset to the hub.

Expectation: A user uses `load_dataset` and can load the videos.

However, the videos seem to be just referenced via paths on the computer and not uploaded to the hub. Therefore a target user cannot load the videos in the dataset.

### Steps to reproduce the bug

1. create a video dataset with paths e.g. { ["videos"]: [path1, path2, ...]}
2. dataset.push_to_hub
3. on a different computer (or same pc if relative paths are used in a different folder):
```
dataset = load_dataset("siplab/egosim", split="train")
video = dataset[0]["video_head"]
```

3. will fail

### Expected behavior

Expectation: A user uses `load_dataset` and can load the videos.

### Environment info

datasets                       3.1.0
Python 3.8.18

Comments: Hi ! the `Video` type is still experimental, and in particular `push_to_hub` doesn't upload videos at the moment (only the paths).

There is an open question to either upload the videos inside the Parquet files, or rather have them as separate files (which is great to enable remote seeking/streaming)

im having the same issue (btw i mistook this to be xet error https://huggingface.co/spaces/xet-team/README/discussions/4 )

@jsulz suggested me to use `upload_folder` but it exceeds hf limits (>10k files per folder and >100k files in total)

from my reading of the docs, in my case i have to save as either parquet or webdataset and then use `upload_folder`

i tried `ds.to_parquet("...")` but the parquet file also doesnt contain video, as of `datasets` v4.0

so i think the only workaround for my case is webdataset

in that case you can create a VideoFolder dataset instead, see the docs at http://huggingface.co/docs/datasets/video_dataset#videofolder
deal with python `10_000` legal number in slice syntax
Author: sfc-gh-sbekman
State: closed
Labels: name: enhancement

### Feature request

```
In [6]: ds = datasets.load_dataset("HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k", split="train_sft[:1000]")

In [7]: ds = datasets.load_dataset("HuggingFaceH4/ultrachat_200k", split="train_sft[:1_000]")
[dozens of frames skipped]
File /usr/local/lib/python3.10/dist-packages/datasets/arrow_reader.py:444, in _str_to_read_instruction(spec)
    442 res = _SUB_SPEC_RE.match(spec)
    443 if not res:
--> 444     raise ValueError(f"Unrecognized instruction format: {spec}")
ValueError: Unrecognized instruction format: train_sft[:1_000]
```

It took me a while to understand what the problem was. But apparently `pyarrow` doesn't allow python numbers that may include `_` as in `1_000`. The `_` aids readability since `10_000_000` vs `10000000` is obviously easier to grasp of what the actual number is.

Feature request:

ideally `datasets` being a python module will do the right thing and convert python numbers into whatever pyarrow supports - in this case stripping `_`s.

Second best it'd err and tell the user that using numbers with `_` in split slices is not acceptible, so that the user won't have to deal with a huge pyarrow assert they know nothing about.

Thank you!

Comments: should be an easy fix, I opened a PR