You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


FIG. 1 shows a conventional cross section view of a display of Prior Art I. The conventional display 10 comprises a panel 12, a light-guide plate 14, a lamp 16, a lamp-reflector 18, a back-bezel 20, and a front-frame 22.
The panel 12 is a non-irradiation display device that needs the light-guide plate 14 to provide a backlight source so as to present images. The panel 12 further comprises a color filter, a liquid crystal layer and a TFT (thin film transistor) array. The TFT array controls tilt angles of the liquid crystal molecules so as to modulate the brightness of the light from the light-guide plate 14. The color filter determines what particular colors should be given out through the panel 12.
Under the panel 12 is a light-guide plate 14, which has a back-end 141, a front-end 143, an upper-surface 142 and a bottom-surface 144. The upper-surface 142 faces the panel 12. The bottom-surface 144 is designed to have a protrusion pattern, which spread the light evenly from the light-guide plate 14.
The lamp 16 is disposed at the back-end 141. The lamp-reflector 18 is disposed outside the lamp 16 for shielding and reflecting purposes. In a typical display 10, a cold cathode fluorescent tube (CCFL) is usually used as the lamp 16. Light emitted from the lamp 16 is led into the light-guide plate 14 through the back-end 141. As mentioned above, the lamp-reflector 18 is significant in various manifolds. First, reflectivity of the lamp-reflector 18 can converge the light generated from the lamp 16 at the back-end 141. Second, the C-shape lamp-reflector 18 as shown can mount thereinside the lamp 16 and the back-end 141 of the light-guide plate 14 nicely and tightly. The lamp-reflector 18 and the back-bezel 20 can be fixed by proper joining means such as like a screw-and-hole pair, or an anchoring bolt-and-slot pair. With the help of the lamp-reflector 18, the light-guide plate 14 inside the back-bezel 20 can be fixed at the back-end 141.
In the last stage of assembly, the front-frame 22 and the back-bezel 20 can be joined and fixed to complete the display 10.
Referring to FIG. 2A, an explosion diagram of the display 10 of Prior Art I is shown. It is well known in the art that, before shipping, the display 10 must go through a series of strict impact tests. To pass the impact tests, the display 10 has a side-protrusion structure 145 on both sides of the light-guide plate 14 for pairing respective ditches 205 at the back-bezel 20. As shown in FIG. 2B, the match of the side-protrusion structure 145 and the ditch 205 can be easily seen.
As shown in FIG. 2A, the panel 12 can be divided into a active area 121 and an non-active area 122, in which the active area 121 locates at the middle portion of the panel 12 for displaying images thereon. The non-active area 122 is located at the margin of the panel 12 and coated with a light-absorptive material so as to allow the light to be transmitted only through the active area 121 of the panel 12. The front-frame 22 is mounted on top of the non-active area 122.
In the assembly of the display 10, the light-guide plate 14 is rested underneath the panel 12, with the side-protrusion structure 145 covered by the non-active area 122 for avoiding possible light intrusion. Despite the light protection provided by the arrangement of the light-guide plate 14 and the non-active area 122, possible light scattering is still possible at the portion of the active area 121 near side-protrusion structure 145. Such a phenomenon is known as the “light leakage”, which would cause an uneven distribution of brightness and damage the image quality of the display 10.
In order to improve the problem of the aforesaid light leakages in Prior Art I, more and more display panels remove the side-protrusion structures 145 on the light-guide plates. Referring to FIG. 3A, a cross section view of a display of the Prior Art II is shown. The display 30 comprises a panel 32, a light-guide plate 34, a lamp 36, a lamp-reflector 38, a back-bezel 40 and a front-frame 42. The panel 32 can be divided into a active area 321 and the non-active area 322. Since most of the devices like Prior Art II are similar to those in Prior Art I, only different devices shall be discussed in the following paragraphs.
Major difference between the Prior Art I and the Prior Art II is that the light-guide plate 34 of the Prior Art II does not have the side-protrusion structure as mentioned in the Prior Art I. In addition, as shown in FIG. 3B, no ditch inside the back-bezel 40 is shown. In order to increase the stability of light-guide plate 34, an adhesive tape 45 to substitute the side-protrusion structure 145 and the ditch 205 in FIG. 2A is applied between the front end 343 of the light-guide plate 34 and the back bezel 40.
As shown in FIG. 3A, the back-bezel 40 has a stair-like structure 401 facing the front-end 343 of the light-guide plate 343. The panel 32 mounts on top of the stair-like structure 401 with a rubber cushion 47 in between.
Although the brightness of Prior Art II is more evenly distributed than that is in Prior Art I, yet the performance of the Prior Art II in anti-vibration is weaker. In the Prior Art II; for the adhesive tape 45 is limited in size, the tape 45 cannot definitely provide sufficient forcing to adhere the light-guide plate 34 onto the back-bezel 40. In particular, in the impact test, the light-guide plate 34 of the display 30, could pound on the lamp 36, or evenly break the lamp 36. Also, the cushion 47 with such a thickness is unable to absorb/blot out all the vibration or shock. Moreover, referring to FIG. 3C, some light (shown as 33) would be reflected by the back-bezel 40 near the front-end 343, which in turns would worsen the light leakages and the image quality of the display.
And so, for those who are devoted in the art of displays and the related fields of industry, to overcome the aforesaid weaknesses is definitely an important task in improving the quality of the displays.