Given multiple reviews about 1974 movie Blazing Saddles, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['Why don\'t you... loosen your bullets? If there was one year that could be proposed as the year of Mel Brooks, it would be 1974. With two of his films, "Blazing Saddles" and "Young Frankenstein" represented in the Box Office top 10, he was America\'s funniest man. Mel Brooks has his own atypical style, but both pictures differ in their ways of being funny and it\'s almost an impossible task to agree on which one is the best. So in retrospect I watched his "Blazing Saddles", probably the funniest Western ever made. The story line is quite... well, let\'s call it unstructured. Though we can find a certain plot in this total mess. "Blazing Saddles" tells the tale about some untrustworthy land speculators who are constructing a railroad, with only one problem. The railroad needs to run through a town called Rock Ridge and they need to find a way to drive the townsfolk out. They hope to accomplish this by sending a black sheriff so the townspeople will revolt. Then again the film has so many things happening at the same time it\'s hard to give a good synopsis. Because in the end this film was created for the purpose of being funny, and damn it is! It feels like as if Mel Brooks can literally get away with anything, and people will let him say or do anything because he has earned this privilege since the distinctively funny debut: "The Producers (1968)". Brooks does everything to keep us laughing at the screen, and overall he succeeds. To truly understand these kind of films you must understand that this is an "audience movie". It is pure entertainment for your jaws and doesn\'t try to be an over-polished film in any way. And "Blazing Saddles" is pure entertainment from beginning to end, sure there are some slow bits though maybe these are a necessity to rest the jaw muscles for a while. "Blazing Saddles" is the perfect introduction for those who are not yet familiar with Brooks\' work. What makes him stand out from your typical satirist is his ability to willingly embrace the redundancy of everything . His humor is more than just vulgarity and something he will always be remembered for. Brooks has no taste, which makes it in some weird way tasteful, and well, if you don\'t understand that, stick with your "Scary Movie" franchise I\'d say. '] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.