System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
Recommend a movie similar to Minority Report, Total Recall, Inside Out, Forrest Gump

[Ground truth Answer]
Let's think step by step.
- Minority Report (action, crime, mystery; 2002)
- Total Recall (action, adventure, science-fiction; 2012)
- Inside Out (animation, family, comedy; 2015)
- Forrest Gump (comedy, drama, romance; 1994)
These are all famous movies produced in the past few decades. I would recommend Edge of Tomorrow (action, adventure, crime, mystery; 2014), as it is also a science-fiction movie and features Tom Cruise.

[Assistant's Response]
Based on your interest in films like "Minority Report," "Total Recall," "Inside Out," and "Forrest Gump," it seems you appreciate a blend of science fiction, psychological depth, and emotional storytelling. Here are several movie recommendations that align with these themes:

1. **Inception (2010)** - Directed by Christopher Nolan, this film intricately weaves action and psychological complexity through the concept of shared dreaming, challenging perceptions of reality and the subconscious.

2. **Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004)** - This unique film combines science fiction with a poignant exploration of memory and relationships. It delves into the emotional ramifications of erasing painful memories, offering a reflective narrative akin to "Inside Out."

3. **The Truman Show (1998)** - Starring Jim Carrey, this film examines themes of reality, free will, and the nature of existence. It resonates with the philosophical undertones found in "Minority Report" and "Total Recall," while also delivering a strong emotional core.

4. **Her (2013)** - Directed by Spike Jonze, "Her" presents a thought-provoking look at love and human connection in the age of technology. It blends elements of science fiction with deep emotional storytelling, similar to the introspective nature of "Inside Out."

5. **The Curious Case of Benjamin Button (2008)** - This film offers a unique narrative that spans a lifetime, much like "Forrest Gump." It explores themes of time, love, and the human experience through the lens of a man who ages backward.

These films should provide a rich mix of thought-provoking concepts and emotional depth, aligning well with the qualities you enjoy in cinema.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: