do a conflict analysis using the following algorithm 1. Identify the participants in the conflict
2. We find the contradiction underlying the conflict.
3. We determine the indivisible resource of the conflict.
4. We find three mandatory signs of conflict.
 
5. Stages of conflict development (up to 4) and incident:
-pre-conflict
INCIDENT;
- conflict;
- conflict resolution
- post-conflict.
6. Strength of the parties to the conflict:
 
7. Is the nature of the conflict true or false, objective/subjective, emotional/business?
8. Ideal images of the parties to the conflict:
 
9. Type of conflict
10. Functions of conflict
11. Possible options for the development of the conflict
12. Your likes and dislikes of the participants in the conflict. The planned distribution bureau of the workshop consisted of four employees and the head of the bureau. The office premises of the workshop were scattered in temporary offices, and therefore the head of the bureau, Parygin, sat separately from his employees. The bureau employees formed a close-knit group. Outwardly, it seemed that the leading role in it was played by Osokina, a woman of about fifty. Another employee stood out - Ukolova, quiet, accustomed to taking on all the household chores of the group: planting and watering flowers, preparing tea, and fulfilling small requests from others. Two more employees, Sorokina and Pashchenko, did not stand out in any way. Everything in the bureau went well, there were no conflicts either within the group or with the head of the bureau; most often Parygin did not even have to be given individual assignments. entered the room and explained. When the need arose, he told the first employee he found what needed to be done. There have never been any crashes. But Osokina was about to retire. She was solemnly seen off, and again everything went fine. However, Parygin decided to strengthen the bureau and hired Redko, a woman of about thirty-five to forty years old, who had a secondary technical education and had previously worked in the planning and distribution bureau of a neighboring workshop, to fill the vacant position. And suddenly the quality of the bureau’s work decreased; not all tasks were completed on time; questions arose that had not arisen before, although the tasks were not particularly novel. Parygin felt that tension had arisen in the relations between the employees. They were dissatisfied with something. He sometimes had the impression that with his visits he was interrupting unpleasant conversations. Everything became clear in the summer, when Sorokina returned from the resort. At this time, Redko suddenly brought a statement to the party committee in which she accused Sorokina of immoral behavior at the resort, to which neither the administration nor public organizations, knowing Sorokina well, reacted. But now it has become clear that the battles in the group are unfolding between Sorokina and Redko. Parygin began to take a closer look at the relationship, visited the retired Osokina and was surprised to discover that Osokina had always been guided by the opinion of Sorokina, as a calm, knowledgeable and reasonable woman. Parygin established that in the previous bureau, Redko was the only employee with a secondary specialized education and enjoyed unquestioned authority among her colleagues. Parygin achieved Redko’s transfer to his previous position, and the situation in the bureau quickly returned to normal.