Can you proofread my article, make the necessary grammatical changes and give me a list of all the changes made:

AI art is beyond impressive, even now with StableDiffusion and MidJourney, things are getting scary good. Now, this isn't just about visual art, but also AI generated audio. I see a serious problem with AI-generated content and how that could affect society negatively. 

People, politicians, unions and corporations are not automatically trustworthy so there may be bad actors out there that are willing to trick society with deepfake's. So I was thinking of ways of how society can fix this issue and I thought of no better solution than cryptocurrency. Don't get me wrong, the focus here isn't the crypto itself but the blockchain and how we can utilize it by ensuring that reputable users produce reputable content. 

On platforms like Hive there is a reputation system, naturally blockchains like Hive favor the most stake. Speaking in generalities, Hive and other blockchains can serve as a good foundation for building new blockchain protocols that emphasize the level of trust and reputation one has on a trustless blockchain. I'm not much of a programmer or a statistician but it would be great to see more developers take on this issue head-on.

For example, if someone releases a deepfake on the non-blockchain powered web then their account won't be negatively affected by any means. We'll have the "fact checkers" doing their best to fact check a deep fake, which is all great and dandy, but if there was more focus on reputation online, then we can find the source and determine whether that source is trustworthy.

A social credit score? That's what blockchains that have reputation systems, which is almost all of them, do, at least when it comes to who is trustworthy enough to make the next block. Specifically, I'm discussing creators who post content on the blockchain, not the validators or miners of a chain.

Now, I'm not saying we need something like China's social credit system. An open source algorithm, in my opinion, should be more preferred than a closed-network of communists determining who is more "righteous" and who deserves benefits in society. When we have journalists, pundits, commentators and even governments who release content, articles, speeches, etc. All of that can be reproduced in the form of smart contracts like NFT where we can trace the original creators and hold them accountable. 

More trust in the blockchain will lead to the wide adoption of blockchain technology. This is very important as of yet, because the deepfakes are going to be a problem in the 2024 election. Just think where AI art will be in 2028. There is a serious issue happening here and this is just me preaching to the choir of developers and cryptocurrency fanatics that understand we have already built the system I am talking about.

I suppose I am just reiterating an important idea where developers and investors can capitalize on. Cryptocurrency has gone beyond what it is. Cryptocurrency and NFT's are no longer the most important part of "Crypto technology". The next major revolution is revolutionizing how we think of trust and reputation on blockchains.

I feel like in many ways the reputation system on some of these blockchains are primitive, especially those that have NFT's available. There needs to be a strong push to creating a comprehensive reputation system that rewards creators for what the community deems as "the truth", or at the very least what crypto users think another user is more trustworthy.