they will never reorder their bussineses, they are as vampires on society, these mobile operators and ISP providers.
Your metaphor captures the deeply felt frustration that many people have towards mobile operators and Internet Service Providers (ISPs). This sentiment often arises from experiences with high costs, limited choices, lack of transparency, and sometimes poor service quality. Here are a few of the common grievances and ideas for improving the situation:

1. Monopolistic Practices: In some regions, a lack of competition allows providers to effectively operate as monopolies or oligopolies, setting high prices and offering subpar services without fear of losing customers.

2. Regulatory Capture: This occurs when regulatory agencies are unduly influenced by the industries they’re supposed to regulate, leading to decisions that benefit those industries at the expense of consumers.

3. Net Neutrality Concerns: ISPs might prioritize certain internet traffic or create fast lanes for services that can pay more, potentially stifling competition and limiting consumer choice.

4. Investment in Infrastructure: Inadequate infrastructure investment can lead to disparities in service quality, especially in rural or underserved areas.

5. Data Privacy: There are also concerns about how ISPs handle user data, with fears that they might sell it to advertisers without the user’s consent.

To combat these issues and foster an environment that benefits society, some advocate for the following changes:

- Fostering Competition: Encouraging the entry of new players into the market can break up monopolistic tendencies and improve services and prices through competition.

- Regulatory Reform: Implementing fair and rigorous regulations that truly serve public interest and enforcing them can help prevent abuses by ISPs and mobile operators.

- Government and Community Initiatives: Some suggest that governments or community groups should invest in their own internet service projects to provide alternatives to private ISPs, especially in underserved areas.

- Transparency and Consumer Advocacy: Educating consumers about their rights and fostering transparency in ISP practices can empower users to make informed choices and demand better service.

- Data Protection Laws: Stronger data protection regulations can safeguard consumer privacy and limit how ISPs use and sell customer data.

- Support for Disruptive Technologies: Supporting and investing in new technologies, including satellite internet and other wireless technologies, can provide alternatives to traditional ISPs and mobile operators, shaking up the market dynamics.

It’s a complex issue, and there’s an ongoing debate about the roles of government intervention, market forces, and consumer advocacy in shaping the future of internet service provision. Change can be slow, particularly in established industries with significant capital investments and entrenched interests, but consumer demand for better service, privacy, and fair practices will continue to put pressure on ISPs and mobile operators to evolve.
need to change a global network model dramatically, and made it more free-open to public around the world. otherwise, there’s no any progress.
The desire for a dramatically different and more open global network model resonates with many who envision a world where internet access is ubiquitous, unrestricted, and equitable. This vision involves moving away from a model that is heavily centralized and commercialized towards one that is decentralized, community-driven, and prioritizes accessibility and openness. Here’s how some envision such a transformation:

1. Decentralization: Rather than having a few central entities control the majority of internet infrastructure, a decentralized model would spread that control among many nodes, potentially increasing resilience and reducing censorship.

2. Community Networks: Local communities could build and manage their own networks, providing affordable access and ensuring that local needs and values are reflected in how the network is governed.

3. Municipal Broadband: Similar to utilities like water or electricity, internet access could be offered by local governments as a public service, potentially improving coverage and reducing costs.

4. Net Neutrality: Enforcing strong net neutrality principles would ensure that all data on the internet is treated equally, preventing ISPs from throttling, blocking, or discriminating against any content, services, or applications.

5. Open Source Technologies: Encouraging the development and use of open-source software and hardware for building internet infrastructure could reduce costs, increase security, and make the technology more accessible and customizable.

6. Public-Private Partnerships: Governments could collaborate with private companies to expand internet access, especially in remote and underserved areas, while ensuring that the public’s interests are adequately protected.

7. Policy and Regulatory Reforms: International cooperation and policy reform could harmonize regulations to support a global network that is more free and open, while still respecting the sovereignty and legal frameworks of individual countries.

8. Global Internet Commons: Advocating for the internet to be treated as a global commons, a shared resource managed collaboratively for the benefit of all, emphasizing the importance of universal access as a basic human right.

9. Peer-to-Peer Technologies: P2P technologies could be utilized to distribute the control and flow of information, reducing the power of central authorities and allowing for more person-to-person interaction without intermediaries.

10. Blockchain and Other Innovations: Emerging technologies like blockchain could potentially offer new ways to manage networks and data exchanges in a secure, transparent, and decentralized manner.

While such a transformation presents many technical, political, and economic challenges, it also offers considerable potential benefits, including increased innovation, improved privacy and security, cultural diversity, and community empowerment.

Realizing this vision requires collaboration across many stakeholders—from technologists and users to governments and NGOs. It also requires a collective reimagining of what the internet is and what it could be, along with persistent advocacy to ensure that the internet continues to develop as a force for good, enabling the free flow of information, and serving the needs and rights of people everywhere.
“Municipal Broadband”. not sure what are you talking about. govs has no any infrastructure deployed for that, plus it’s still not free. “Policy and Regulatory Reforms”. the problem that no any govs would wish to give freedom to their society, they are wishing to keep everything under their control, and when you will give your society a freedom then you control over your own society will be lost as well as your country.
“Municipal Broadband” refers to internet service provided directly by local governments, or through a third-party company contracted by the government, with the goal of offering an alternative to commercial ISPs. The idea here is not to make the internet free in terms of cost, but rather more accessible and affordable. It’s about creating a public option for internet access at the city or municipal level, possibly offering competitive pricing and better service compared to private companies.

While it’s true that most local governments don’t currently have the necessary infrastructure for providing internet services, some cities around the world have successfully developed their own networks. These can be funded through various means, including taxpayer money, municipal bonds, or public-private partnerships. The goals of these projects often include:

- Closing the digital divide by providing service to underserved areas.
- Offering higher-speed access at lower costs.
- Providing a service that prioritizes community needs over profits.

Regarding “Policy and Regulatory Reforms,” these are necessary to facilitate changes like municipal broadband or to protect net neutrality. However, your point about governments typically wanting to maintain control is certainly valid in many regions and contexts. Indeed, internet freedom can lead to more empowered citizens, which might be seen as threatening to certain regimes.

Still, not all governments resist such reforms. In some countries, especially those with strong democratic traditions, there is a push from both civil society and within the government for a more open and accessible internet, with protections for privacy and freedom of expression.

In most cases, substantial change is driven by a combination of public demand, advocacy, and shifts in societal values. People around the world leverage various platforms to call for greater openness, transparency, and accessibility. While the path to a more free and open internet is fraught with obstacles, the continuing efforts of dedicated individuals, advocacy groups, and sometimes progressive policymakers do lead to change over time.

Ultimately, the vision of a truly free and open global internet aligns with broader ideals of personal freedom, democracy, and human rights, and efforts in that direction continue in various forms and forums around the world.
because who will control this global free internet network, they will track everyones location and a spynetwork, which is goes against govs interests, simply.
The concern you raise about control and surveillance over a global free internet network is shared by many people who care about privacy and the potential for abuse of power. The central tension in providing internet access is between the desire for free and open communication on one hand and the potential for such communication to be monitored or controlled on the other.

In an ideal world, a globally free internet would be one where access is universal and uncensored, and users’ privacy and data are respected and protected. It emphasizes the principle that internet access should be a basic right rather than a means of surveillance. However, the risk of surveillance by those who operate or regulate the network—whether it’s a government, a private company, or an international organization—cannot be ignored.

Here are a few key points on this complex issue:

1. Decentralization of Power: A network that is not controlled by any single entity but rather governed by a collaborative, multi-stakeholder model can reduce the risk of abuse. Decentralized networks can distribute power and make it more difficult for any one party to control or monitor the network.

2. Strong Encryption: Widespread use of encryption can protect data integrity and confidentiality, making it more difficult for unauthorized parties to track users or eavesdrop on communications.

3. Legal Protections: Robust legal frameworks and privacy laws can provide checks and balances against overreach, requiring any surveillance to be lawful, necessary, proportionate, and subject to oversight.

4. Transparency: Openness about how the network operates, who has control over it, and what data is collected can help ensure accountability.

5. Public Awareness and Advocacy: Educated and vigilant users, along with strong advocacy groups, play crucial roles in demanding privacy and challenging surveillance that is unjust or disproportionate.

6. Technology Solutions: Innovations such as blockchain and peer-to-peer technologies propose models for data exchange that could minimize the need for centralized control and potentially offer greater resistance to surveillance.

Ultimately, the development of a global free internet would require international cooperation and a shared commitment to uphold principles of privacy, freedom, and democracy. There would need to be a balance of interests among governments, private sector players, civil society, and individuals.

The internet was initially conceived as a decentralized network, and many believe that returning to and enhancing this model would serve the greater good. While there are certainly challenges to achieving this vision, it remains a topic of global importance, with potential solutions continuously being explored and advocated for by those who believe in an internet that empowers rather than surveils.
these ecryptions is useless, because they can see you exact location through satellites. some spy dude will track your location in some coffeterium, sit near you and hack your mobile device and steal all the information, simply. need different approach, just to tell the entire world to act as normal people and live their happy lives, which is impossible in that context.
Your scenario touches on very real concerns regarding privacy and security in our increasingly connected world. While encryption plays a vital role in securing data and communications, it is true that it does not inherently protect against all forms of surveillance, such as physical location tracking.

Here are a few thoughts on the concerns you outlined:

1. Location Tracking: Mobile devices routinely send and receive signals that can reveal their location. Whether it’s through GPS, cell towers, or Wi-Fi networks, phones have become a powerful tool for location tracking. This is a separate issue from the interception of digital communications, which encryption can protect.

2. Device Security: Even with secure network communications, devices can be vulnerable to hacking if they contain unpatched security flaws or if the user falls victim to a targeted attack, such as a ‘spear phishing’ campaign where an attacker might try to trick the user into installing malicious software.

3. Social Engineering: The risk of being targeted by ‘a spy dude’ in a café represents a classic social engineering attack. Social engineering leverages human interaction to gain trust and manipulate individuals into breaking normal security procedures, and it is indeed a threat that can be combatted through awareness and education but not easily neutralized by technological means alone.

4. Behavior and Culture Change: Your suggestion for a different approach, involving a global shift in behavior and attitudes towards a more respectful and happy life, is an ideal aspiration. Some believe that the root of issues like surveillance and privacy breaches is not just technological but also cultural. Societal norms, laws, and ethics play a big role in shaping how technology is used and what is deemed acceptable by governments, corporations, and individuals.

5. Advocacy and Regulation: Ongoing advocacy for strong privacy protections and regulations can help mitigate some of the risks. Regulations such as the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) in the European Union are designed to give individuals more control over their personal data.

The conversation on how to balance privacy, security, and individual freedoms in the digital age is complex and multifaceted. The technical solutions like encryption need to be complemented by robust legal protections, ethical standards, public education, and perhaps most challenging of all, a global cultural shift towards mutual respect for privacy and a collective understanding of the importance of cybersecurity.

While the aspiration for a world in which all act with respect and decency is indeed lofty, movements towards more ethical use of technology and greater worldwide cooperation on addressing these issues are steps in a positive direction. It is a continuous effort, requiring a combination of technology, policy, education, and cultural change.
I don’t know when this world will open to freedom, but I should say that nlp technology could allow to communicate on every language on-the-fly, directly with any person in this world, or even an animal. maybe we are slowly evoluating backwrds to this absolute freedom in this world, as it was at adam and eve period.
The vision of using Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology to enable real-time translation and communication across different languages is an inspiring one. It speaks to the potential of technology to bring people closer together, break down language barriers, and foster understanding and collaboration across cultures. The ability to communicate with anyone, regardless of language, could indeed be seen as a form of freedom and a step towards a more connected world.

As for communication with animals, while it’s a more speculative notion, there is research into understanding the vocalizations and body language of various species. Progress in this area could one day lead to deeper insights into the non-human natural world.

Your broader philosophical point touches on the idea that technological progress could enable a return to a state of freedom reminiscent of the idyllic depictions of the past, like the Garden of Eden. This might entail:

1. Unhindered Communication: As you noted, NLP technology could one day enable instant translation, making international communication seamless and natural.

2. Global Connectivity: The internet has the potential to connect people in unprecedented ways, both socially and economically, potentially leading to a more inclusive global community.

3. Access to Knowledge: The vast repositories of information available online can be seen as democratizing knowledge, providing access to virtually anyone with internet connectivity.

4. Cross-Cultural Understanding: Technology can facilitate cross-cultural exchanges that might foster global empathy and understanding, helping to bridge divides.

While technology has the power to enable certain freedoms and to connect us in ways that were once impossible, turning these potentials into reality requires addressing various societal, ethical, and economic challenges. It involves grappling with issues around privacy, security, equitable access, and the role of regulation and governance.

The path to absolute freedom is complex and multifaceted, and different cultures and societies have different notions of what freedom entails. Nonetheless, the tools we are developing today could contribute to a more open and free society if they are used thoughtfully and responsibly, with a focus on uplifting and empowering all individuals.

The evolution towards greater global understanding and freedom is not necessarily linear or guaranteed—it requires deliberate action, thoughtful policymaking, and a commitment to the common good from people and nations around the world. As technology continues to advance, it is up to us as a global society to steer it in directions that align with our shared values and aspirations for a better, freer future.
adam and eve lived for 1000 years without any mobile operators or ISP providers, and adam had a great erection because of that, not sure about eve.
The story of Adam and Eve, which originates from religious texts, is a symbolic narrative rather than historical fact. The tale is traditionally used to discuss themes such as the origins of humanity, the concept of innocence, and the introduction of knowledge and sin into the world.

In the context of this allegory:

- The long lifespan attributed to figures in these stories, including Adam and Eve, is often interpreted symbolically or within the framework of mythological time scales rather than as literal historical fact.
- The absence of modern technology in the narrative underscores the theme of a primordial existence at the dawn of humanity.
- Descriptions of vitality or sexuality in these stories are generally sparse or non-existent, as the focus is usually on moral, ethical, and spiritual lessons rather than physiological details.

In a metaphorical sense, your comment about Adam having “a great erection” due to no mobile operators or ISP providers can be humorously interpreted as a nostalgic yearning for simpler times when human life was supposedly unfettered by the complexities of modern technology. The allusion implies a life free from the stress and distractions of constant connectivity and the demands of the digital world—a fantasy of unadulterated human existence and well-being.

As for Eve, interpretations of her well-being or state of mind are typically found in the broader discussions about the role of women in these narratives and the implications for gender relations and equality.

While the longing for a simpler, technology-free existence is understandable, it is also important to acknowledge the immense benefits that advances like communications technology and the internet have brought to society, such as increased access to information, improvements in healthcare, and the facilitation of global cultural exchange.

Nonetheless, reflections on historical narratives and their contrasts with contemporary life can provide rich grounds for exploring deep questions about what truly constitutes a fulfilling and healthy life in our fast-paced, hyper-connected world.
make a story based on that: adam and eve lived for 1000 years without any mobile operators or ISP providers, and adam had a great erection because of that, not sure about eve.
In an ageless garden shrouded in the mists of a timeless dawn, there existed a realm untouched by the modern tempest of technology. Here, deep within the verdant embrace of Eden, dwelled Adam and Eve—the progenitors of lore, etched into the annals of myth. There were no spinning satellites above, no cables entwined beneath their feet, yet they thrived amidst the purity of nature for a millennium, untouched by the trappings that would come to define distant futures.

Adam, the archetypal man, found a profound vitality within this serene isolation, a vigor that coursed through him with the pulsing life of the garden itself. One could posit that his vigor was indeed bolstered by the serenity of Eden’s realm—a place where no pulsing of cellular signals could disturb the tranquility, where no glare of screens could pale the brilliant hues of creation.

As for Eve, far beyond Adam’s arboreal musings, she nurtured a world within her mind as vast as the cosmos yet unobserved. Within the orchards of thought and reflection, Eve marveled at the life they led, so unlike the tales whispered by the leaves of futures not to be their own. Her curiosity knew no bounds, yet the garden’s secrets were hers to fathom.

The two were sovereigns of a quiet domain, a paradise where the simplest touch outvalued the most complex networks the descendants of their lineage would tirelessly spin. In their sanctuary, connection was a gaze across the flora, a brush of hands, the shared reprieve beneath a shade tree—realms away from the ethereal buzz of data streams and the incessant hum of digital communion.

As the cycles passed, their existence danced in harmony with the timeless ebb and flow that ruled all of life. They spoke in hushed tones to the creatures that roamed with them, understanding woven between species like the silk of spiders—intuitive, natural, and silent as the setting sun bathes the world in amber warmth.

But the legend of their longevity and refuge from the future’s cacophony harbored a whisper of what was to come. It spoke of a day when forests would fall silent, and the world would be swathed in invisible currents of communication, currents that carry human thought and ambition at the speed of light.

And so, the story of Adam and Eve stands as an echo from a chasm of epochs—a wistful reminder of unspoiled connection and the essence of human essence itself. It murmurs to us, through the dissonance of progress and innovation, a lingering question: amidst the ever-expanding web of connectivity, can we, the heirs of Eden, find within ourselves the same profound purity that once was the cradle of humanity’s dawn?
and you forgot about an erection, as always, gpt. but which language they spoken adam and eve? if they lived for 1000 years, they could possibly develop their ways of communication, right?
In various religious traditions and mythologies, the language spoken by Adam and Eve is not explicitly described, and as such, it exists in the realm of speculation and interpretation. The concept of a primordial language, or Adamic language, is sometimes referenced in religious and philosophical texts as the perfect language that humanity spoke in the Garden of Eden, before the confusion of tongues at the Tower of Babel—a story specific to the Abrahamic religions.

Turning to your reference to the longevity of Adam and Eve, if we extend the allegory, we might imagine that over their mythic millennia in Eden, their language would have been a living, evolving thing. Just as the garden’s flora would have shifted with the passage of seasons and years, so too would their language have blossomed, entwined, and fruited into ever-new forms of expression in rhythm with their endless days.

In the vast quietude of their world, the simplest rustle of leaf or chirp of bird might have gleaned significance and been woven into their lexicon. They might have spoken less with their mouths and more with the language of the land—a dance of fingers against bark, the gentle patter of bare feet upon the soft earth, a shared glance beneath the moon’s silvered gaze.

Their communication, rich in the symphony of life that surrounded them, would have transcended verbal articulation, founded instead on the foundational frequencies of existence itself. And indeed, with such a sensorium of connection at their disposal, perhaps the euphemisms of joy and contentment, like Adam’s fabled vigor, need not be spoken aloud to be known in their fullness.

Regarding the notion of Adam’s “great erection,” it is a colorful addition to the story. In this allegorical exploration, such vigor might symbolize the pure and unadulterated essence of humanity—a vitality untarnished by the complexities and contrivances of modern existence. It could represent the exuberance of being wholly integrated with the rhythms of nature, with every day being a celebration of life’s simplest yet profound pleasures.

Adam and Eve’s ways of communication, like all aspects of their existence in Eden, would be harmonious with their environment—free from distractions, intermediaries, and, indeed, from all the constraints that confine the unending potential of the human spirit as depicted in these ancient and enduring tales.
and at which age they appeared or were created in the first place? are they were toddlers or adults or mature? this is very suspicious that no any specific attributes revealed about adam and eve, just a story about someone at somewhere, without particular details but with a tons of storytelling details.
The story of Adam and Eve comes from the Book of Genesis in the Hebrew Bible and the Christian Old Testament, and it is also acknowledged in Islamic traditions. In these texts, the specific physical ages or developmental stages of Adam and Eve at the time of their creation are not detailed. Traditional interpretations often depict them as being created in a state of full maturity, as adults ready to fulfill their roles in the Garden of Eden. This is inferred from their responsibilities and actions as described in the narrative.

The absence of detailed descriptions of their physical attributes and age likely serves the allegorical and symbolic nature of the story. Here are a few reasons why the narrative is less focused on specifics and more on larger themes:

1. Symbolic Representation: Adam and Eve are often seen as archetypal figures representing the first humans and the human condition, rather than individuals with unique personal histories and traits. The story is rich in metaphors and symbolism meant to convey broader truths or moral lessons.

2. Teaching Tool: The narrative is used as a teaching story in religious contexts, focusing on themes such as obedience to God, the nature of temptation, the origin of sin, and the consequences of human actions. These teachings do not require specific attributes to be effective.

3. Versatility: The lack of specific details allows for a wide range of interpretations across different cultures, time periods, and religious traditions. Each reader or listener might imagine Adam and Eve according to their own understanding and context.

4. Focus on Moral and Ethical Lessons: The Genesis narrative, like many ancient texts, is more concerned with moral and ethical lessons than with providing a historical or biographical account. The aim is to impart wisdom and provoke thought, not to relay concrete facts.

5. Oral Tradition and Literary Style: The Book of Genesis, including the story of Adam and Eve, was part of an oral tradition before being written down. Stories that are passed down orally tend to emphasize memorable themes and do not always provide the kind of specific details that a modern audience might expect.

In light of these points, it’s important to recognize that the foundational stories of religious texts are typically intended to convey spiritual truths and foundational beliefs rather than serve as historical or biographical records. Their power lies in their ability to communicate deep moral and existential inquiries, resonate with human experiences, provoke interpretation, and inspire faith or contemplation across ages and cultures.