please review and correct the following message.

Thank you for your patience in writing this email with a lot of information, as well as for giving us a good opportunity to clarify the issues and many of the inaccuracies in the content of the message.

Therefore, we would like to first appreciate the role of the telecommunications company in the great role it played in completing the conversion works, and we have no doubt that the work was completed in accordance with the engineering rules and principles as it is under the supervision of the telecommunications company.

Secondly, we would like to clarify that the main reference for us in reviewing the extract is the contract signed between us, whether in terms of items or quantities, and we will not accept any deviation from this contract.

This does not prevent us from understanding that there are some works that may arise during implementation and are not included in the contract, and these works should have been notified to us at the time to study them and study their impact on the project and inform the owner of them, but they were not handled professionally by you regarding these items, and we did not receive any notification from you.

If we go back to some of the details mentioned in your message, regarding the lengths of cables, we did not decide at all that we would adopt the lengths of cables the same as the lengths of excavations. For us, this phrase is completely ridiculous, and we are very sorry for passing these inaccuracies to you. The only thing that is certain is that we have no objection at all to calculating the lengths of cables as they were executed on the ground and calculating the spare lengths inside the manholes, and our request was only to verify these lengths inside one manhole only. And indeed, the site was visited, and the surprise was when the check was done on a random manhole, we found that there were no spare lengths at all inside the manhole, this is for copper cables.

As for the works of connections and welding, we did not at all request to open any connections or welds, but we only requested to clarify between the different welding works in order to be able to count them numerically, and this is due to the existence of more than one item for welding works, so there is no need to exaggerate this matter by passing inaccurate information and talking about the sensitivity of these works.

As for municipal permits, if you refer to the contract, this item is clear and explicit, and it will be calculated according to the approved contract, and we will not accept any deviation from the contract.

Regarding 32 mm pipes, first, we appreciate the instructions of the telecommunications authority and its guidance for some works, and we have no objection to that, but it was your duty to deal professionally in this matter, and inform us of these changes and prove them officially, and study their impact on the project and its adoption, but unfortunately this did not happen.

Also, there is no item in the contract for this diameter of pipes, which requires an annex to the contract to include this type of items that were implemented on the site and do not have any reference items in the contract, so how can we adopt them for you without these procedures?

Regarding the removal of cables, we do not have any disagreement that this item is in the contract, and that you have delivered these cables to the telecommunications authority, and this does not prevent our right to request an official document from the telecommunications authority stating that it has received the quantities listed in the extract from the City Vision project.

As for asphalt works, you mentioned that there are two types of roads: advanced roads and ordinary roads. We only requested clarification of the difference between them in order to be able to review the quantities listed in both items.

Finally, you mentioned that Al-Ajmi wants to deduct an amount of 1.5 million riyals after the review. Here I would like to assure you that we have no desire to deduct a specific amount, but our goal is only to verify the quantities executed, whatever their value, and to cancel the rights of every one. Here I would like to remind you that we have a bad experience with you when the first extract was raised, which was worth approximately 5 million riyals, and after the review with your team and verification of the quantities, its value reached approximately 300 thousand riyals after the review, and the extract was approved on that basis at the time. Does this not indicate anything?

**I would like to request that you attend in person during the reviews to avoid any inaccurate information being passed to you by your team, and I assure you that we are very careful to give you all your rights as they were executed in nature and in accordance with the contract signed between