System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Name the top cities in France that should not be missed. Include the best aspects of each place as well.

[Ground truth Answer]
1- Paris, Best for: Historic sights and romantic vibes
2- Nice, Best for: Architecture and dining
3- Lyon, Best for: Dining and live music
4- Bordeaux, Best for: Wine and antiques
5- Marseille, Best for: Museums and nightlife
6- Strasbourg, Best for: Historic architecture and dining

[Assistant's Response]
France is home to a multitude of captivating cities, each offering its own unique charm and attractions. Here are some of the top cities you shouldn't miss, along with their best aspects:

1. **Paris**: The capital city is synonymous with romance and culture. Iconic landmarks such as the Eiffel Tower, the Louvre Museum, and Notre-Dame Cathedral draw millions of visitors each year. The charming neighborhoods like Montmartre and Le Marais are filled with art, history, and a vibrant café culture, making Paris a must-visit destination.

2. **Nice**: Nestled on the French Riviera, Nice is celebrated for its stunning Mediterranean beaches and the famous Promenade des Anglais. The city's vibrant markets, particularly the Cours Saleya, and its picturesque old town (Vieux Nice) with colorful buildings and narrow streets create a delightful atmosphere.

3. **Lyon**: Known as the gastronomic capital of France, Lyon is a paradise for food lovers. Traditional bouchons serve local specialties, and the city’s rich culinary heritage is complemented by its historical architecture, particularly in the Vieux Lyon district. The cultural scene, including theaters and festivals, adds to its appeal.

4. **Bordeaux**: Famous for its exceptional wine, Bordeaux boasts beautiful 18th-century architecture and a lively riverfront. The Cité du Vin offers an immersive experience for wine enthusiasts, while the surrounding vineyards provide scenic landscapes and tasting opportunities that are not to be missed.

5. **Marseille**: As France’s second-largest city, Marseille is a melting pot of cultures, known for its diverse culinary scene and stunning coastal views. The Old Port (Vieux-Port) is bustling with seafood restaurants and lively markets, while the nearby Calanques National Park offers breathtaking natural scenery for outdoor enthusiasts.

6. **Strasbourg**: This picturesque city beautifully blends French and German influences, evident in its architecture and cuisine. The charming La Petite France district, with its half-timbered houses and canals, is a highlight, along with the stunning Strasbourg Cathedral, which is a masterpiece of Gothic architecture.

7. **Toulouse**: Known as "La Ville Rose" (The Pink City) due to its distinctive terracotta buildings, Toulouse is vibrant and rich in history. The city is a hub for the aerospace industry and offers a lively atmosphere with excellent food, cultural events, and beautiful parks.

Each of these cities showcases the rich diversity and cultural heritage of France, making them essential stops on any journey through the country.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: