System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Please let me know all available entities for the provided question.\nQuestion: I need to find citizens of Ancient Rome during the time of the Roman Empire who died somewhere other than Toulouse.

[Ground truth Answer]
Suetonius, Odoacer, Gallienus, Clodius Celsinus Adelphius, Septimius Bassus, Petronius Probinus, Flavius Antiochianus, Gaius Julius Erucius Clarus Vibianus, Marcus Licinius Crassus Frugi, Plotinus, Josephus, Virgil, Tiberius, Caligula, Claudius, Nero, Galba, Vespasian, Titus, Domitian, Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Marcus Aurelius, Commodus, Didius Julianus, Septimius Severus, Caracalla, Honorius, Pliny the Younger, Valentinian III, Apuleius, Pontius Pilatus, Ammianus Marcellinus, Tertullian, Macrinus, Elagabalus, Alexander Severus, Gordian III, Irenaeus, Decius, Licinius, Cassius Dio, Constans, Quintillus, Silvanus, Gratian, Zenobia, Cyprian, Appian, Germanicus, Saint Valentine, Pescennius Niger, Titus Livius, Seneca, Syagrius, Magnentius, Tacitus, Claudia Octavia, Scribonia, Galla Placidia, Annia Faustina, Publius Papinius Statius, Titus Sextius Magius Lateranus, Claudia Acte, Aurelius Victor, Frontinus, Sextus Pompeius Festus, Crispus, Herodes Atticus, Celsus, Carausius, Columella, Julian, Gnaeus Domitius Ahenobarbus, Constantius Gallus, Maurus Servius Honoratus, Quintus Aurelius Symmachus, Nepotianus, Plutarch, Diocletian, Gaius Julius Civilis, Arria, Gaius Asinius Gallus Saloninus, Bonifacius, Constantius II, Berenice, Theodosius I, Valentinian I, Valerian, Claudius Gothicus, Aurelian, Livia, Petronius, Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa, Saint George, Olympiodorus of Thebes, Lucius Annaeus Cornutus, Proculus, Salvius Julianus, Gaius Furius Sabinius Aquila Timesitheus, Quintus Labienus, Clearchus, Rutilius Claudius Namatianus, Ovid, Cicero Minor, Aspren, Augustine of Hippo, Pliny the Elder, Constantine the Great, Paul, Tiberius Claudius Pompeianus

[Assistant's Response]
To address your question about citizens of Ancient Rome during the Roman Empire who died outside of Toulouse, here are the available entities to consider:

1. **Historical Figures**: This includes notable individuals such as emperors, generals, philosophers, and writers who lived during the Roman Empire and may have died in various locations across the empire.

2. **Geographical Locations**: Various cities and regions within the Roman Empire where these individuals might have died, such as Rome, Alexandria, Carthage, and other significant locations.

3. **Cultural Context**: Understanding the societal norms and practices related to death and burial during the Roman Empire can provide insight into where citizens might have died.

4. **Archaeological Evidence**: Findings from excavations that may indicate the presence of Roman citizens in different locations and their burial sites.

5. **Historical Records**: Texts and documents from historians of the time that mention the deaths of Roman citizens and their places of demise.

If you have a specific individual or type of citizen in mind, feel free to share, and I can help narrow it down further!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: