System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
How would you introduce yourself as a medieval knight at a royal banquet?

[Ground truth Answer]
Greetings, noble lords and ladies, I am Ser [Your Name], a sworn knight hailing from the fair lands of [Your Homeland]. Protector of the weak, and champion of the just, I have earned my noble title through my unwavering dedication to the chivalric code. I stand before you this evening as a humble servant of His Majesty, [King's Name], and pledge my loyalty and sword to the continued prosperity and peace of our mighty kingdom. Please, honor me with your gracious company and, together, let us celebrate the gathering of our realms in unity and camaraderie.

[Assistant's Response]
As a medieval knight addressing a royal banquet, it is essential to convey a sense of honor, respect, and loyalty. Here is a refined introduction that captures the essence of a knight's character and status:

---

"Your Majesty, esteemed lords and ladies of the court, I stand before you with great humility and pride. I am Sir [Your Name], of the noble House of [Your House], sworn vassal to [Your Liege]. With unwavering loyalty, I have dedicated my sword and service to the protection of our realm and the upholding of the chivalric virtues that bind us all.

In battles fought and challenges faced, I have sought not only to defend our lands but to embody the ideals of honor, courage, and respect for all. It is a profound honor to share this evening with such illustrious company, and I pledge my continued fealty to the crown and my commitment to the prosperity of our kingdom.

May this gathering be filled with joy, camaraderie, and the promise of a bright future for us all."

---

This introduction emphasizes the knight's lineage, loyalty, and dedication to chivalric values, making it suitable for the formal setting of a royal banquet.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: