Write%20an%20extensive%20article%20about%20the%20given%20topic,%20providing%20in-depth%20analysis,%20supported%20arguments,%20and%20a%20well-structured%20narrative.%0A%0A%23%20Steps%0A%0A1.%20**Introduction**:%20%0A%20%20%20-%20Begin%20with%20a%20hook%20to%20engage%20the%20reader.%0A%20%20%20-%20Clearly%20state%20the%20thesis%20or%20main%20purpose%20of%20the%20article.%0A%20%20%20-%20Provide%20a%20brief%20outline%20of%20the%20points%20that%20will%20be%20discussed.%0A%0A2.%20**Body%20Paragraphs**:%0A%20%20%20-%20Organize%20the%20article%20into%20coherent%20paragraphs.%0A%20%20%20-%20Each%20paragraph%20should%20focus%20on%20a%20single%20point%20or%20argument%20supporting%20the%20thesis.%0A%20%20%20-%20Use%20evidence,%20examples,%20and%20citations%20to%20support%20each%20point.%0A%20%20%20-%20Ensure%20smooth%20transitions%20between%20paragraphs%20to%20maintain%20the%20flow%20of%20the%20article.%0A%0A3.%20**Conclusion**:%0A%20%20%20-%20Summarize%20the%20main%20arguments%20made%20in%20the%20article.%0A%20%20%20-%20Reiterate%20the%20thesis%20in%20the%20light%20of%20the%20discussion.%0A%20%20%20-%20Offer%20final%20thoughts%20or%20implications%20of%20the%20topic.%0A%0A%23%20Output%20Format%0A%0AThe%20article%20should%20be%20structured%20in%20paragraph%20format,%20with%20a%20clear%20introduction,%20several%20body%20paragraphs,%20and%20a%20conclusion.%20Write%20heading%20sections%20if%20necessary.%20The%20expected%20length%20will%20vary%20based%20on%20the%20complexity%20of%20the%20topic%20but%20should%20be%20comprehensive%20and%20thorough.%20Use%20standard%20article%20formatting%20with%20appropriate%20headers,%20if%20necessary.%20Output%20in%20markdown.%0A%0A%23%20Notes%0A%0A-%20Make%20sure%20to%20stay%20on%20topic%20and%20address%20the%20prompt%20thoroughly.%0A-%20Avoid%20repetition%20and%20ensure%20clarity%20in%20your%20arguments%20and%20narrative.%0A-%20Maintain%20an%20academic%20tone%20and%20adhere%20to%20proper%20grammar%20and%20style%20conventions.%0A-%20Your%20article%20should%20be%20approximately%203000%20words%20long.%20Aim%20to%20be%20within%2010%25%20of%20this%20target.%0A%0A-%0A%0AWrite%20your%20response%20with%20the%20following%20requirements%20in%20mind:%20%0A%0ADon't%20use%20this%20words:%20Overall,%20Explore,%20Captivate,%20Tapestry,%20Leverage,%20Embrace,%20Resonate,%20Dynamic,%20Testament,%20Fascinating,%20intersection,%20Delve,%20Elevate,%20Navigate,%20Navigating,%20landscape,%20unravel.%0A%0AParaphrase%20every%20other%20verb,%20noun%20and%20adjective%20with%20a%20more%20conversational%20alternative.%20Longer,%20descriptive%20phrases%20are%20preferred%20over%20single%20adjectives.%20%0A%0A-%0A%0ATOPIC:%0ASkip%2520to%2520content%250A%250A%250AKELLOGG%2520SCHOOL%2520OF%2520MANAGEMENT%2520AT%2520NORTHWESTERN%2520UNIVERSITY%250A%250A%250A%250A%250A%250AINNOVATION%250ADEC%25202,%25202020%250AWhy%2520Do%2520Some%2520People%2520Succeed%2520after%2520Failing,%2520While%2520Others%2520Continue%2520to%2520Flounder%253F%250AA%2520new%2520study%2520dispels%2520some%2520of%2520the%2520mystery%2520behind%2520success%2520after%2520failure.%250A%250A%250AListen%2520to%2520this%2520article%25200:00%2520Minutes%250ARiley%2520Mann%250A%250ABASED%2520ON%2520THE%2520RESEARCH%2520OF%250AYian%2520Yin%250AYang%2520Wang%250AJames%2520Evans%250ADashun%2520Wang%250AMany%2520notable%2520success%2520stories%2520began%2520in%2520failure:%2520Henry%2520Ford%2520went%2520bankrupt%2520before%2520starting%2520the%2520Ford%2520Motor%2520Company;%2520Thomas%2520Edison%2520and%2520his%2520colleagues%2520tested%2520thousands%2520of%2520materials%2520before%2520creating%2520the%2520carbon-filament%2520lightbulb;%2520J.%2520K.%2520Rowling%2520received%2520twelve%2520rejections%2520before%2520the%2520first%2520Harry%2520Potter%2520book%2520was%2520published.%250AThese%2520are%2520inspiring%2520examples,%2520to%2520be%2520sure%25E2%2580%2594but%2520Dashun%2520Wang%2520didn%25E2%2580%2599t%2520think%2520they%2520told%2520the%2520whole%2520story.%2520Why%2520did%2520these%2520individuals%2520ultimately%2520succeed,%2520when%2520so%2520many%2520others%2520never%2520manage%2520to%2520get%2520past%2520their%2520failing%2520phase%253F%250A%25E2%2580%259CIf%2520we%2520understand%2520that%2520process,%2520could%2520we%2520anticipate%2520whether%2520you%2520will%2520become%2520a%2520winner,%2520even%2520when%2520you%2520are%2520still%2520a%2520loser%253F%25E2%2580%259D%2520asks%2520Wang,%2520an%2520associate%2520professor%2520of%2520management%2520and%2520organizations%2520at%2520the%2520Kellogg%2520School,%2520who%2520directs%2520the%2520Center%2520for%2520Science%2520of%2520Science%2520and%2520Innovation%2520(CSSI).%250AIn%2520a%2520new%2520paper%2520published%2520in%2520the%2520150th%2520anniversary%2520issue%2520of%2520Nature,%2520Wang%2520and%2520colleagues%2520developed%2520a%2520mathematical%2520model%2520to%2520pinpoint%2520what%2520separates%2520those%2520who%2520succeed%2520from%2520those%2520who%2520merely%2520try,%2520try%2520again.%2520Along%2520with%2520PhD%2520student%2520Yian%2520Yin%2520and%2520postdoctoral%2520researcher%2520Yang%2520Wang%2520at%2520CSSI,%2520and%2520James%2520A.%2520Evans%2520of%2520the%2520University%2520of%2520Chicago,%2520Wang%2520found%2520that%2520success%2520comes%2520down%2520to%2520learning%2520from%2520one%25E2%2580%2599s%2520prior%2520mistakes%25E2%2580%2594for%2520instance,%2520continuing%2520to%2520improve%2520the%2520parts%2520of%2520an%2520invention%2520that%2520aren%25E2%2580%2599t%2520working%2520rather%2520than%2520scrapping%2520them,%2520or%2520recognizing%2520which%2520sections%2520of%2520a%2520denied%2520application%2520to%2520keep%2520and%2520which%2520to%2520rewrite.%250ABut%2520it%25E2%2580%2599s%2520not%2520simply%2520that%2520those%2520who%2520learn%2520more%2520as%2520they%2520go%2520have%2520better%2520odds%2520of%2520victory.%2520Rather,%2520there%25E2%2580%2599s%2520a%2520critical%2520tipping%2520point.%2520If%2520your%2520ability%2520to%2520build%2520on%2520your%2520earlier%2520attempts%2520is%2520above%2520a%2520certain%2520threshold,%2520you%25E2%2580%2599ll%2520likely%2520succeed%2520in%2520the%2520end.%2520But%2520if%2520it%25E2%2580%2599s%2520even%2520a%2520hair%2520below%2520that%2520threshold,%2520you%2520may%2520be%2520doomed%2520to%2520keep%2520churning%2520out%2520failure%2520after%2520failure%2520forever.%250A%25E2%2580%259CPeople%2520on%2520those%2520two%2520sides%2520of%2520the%2520threshold,%2520they%2520could%2520be%2520exactly%2520the%2520same%2520kind%2520of%2520people,%25E2%2580%259D%2520says%2520Wang,%2520%25E2%2580%259Cbut%2520they%2520will%2520have%2520two%2520very%2520different%2520outcomes.%25E2%2580%259D%250AUsing%2520this%2520insight,%2520the%2520researchers%2520are%2520able%2520to%2520successfully%2520predict%2520an%2520individual%25E2%2580%2599s%2520long-term%2520success%2520with%2520just%2520a%2520small%2520amount%2520of%2520information%2520about%2520that%2520person%25E2%2580%2599s%2520initial%2520attempts.%250AMeasuring%2520Success%2520in%2520Three%2520Different%2520Domains%250AA%2520growing%2520body%2520of%2520research%2520supports%2520the%2520idea%2520that%2520failure%2520can%2520make%2520you%2520better%2520off%2520in%2520the%2520long%2520run.%2520Indeed,%2520in%2520another%2520recent%2520study,%2520Wang%2520himself%2520found%2520that%2520an%2520early%2520career%2520setback%2520often%2520set%2520up%2520scientists%2520for%2520later%2520success.%250AHowever,%2520as%2520the%2520stories%2520of%2520Ford,%2520Edison,%2520and%2520Rowling%2520plainly%2520demonstrate,%2520the%2520road%2520to%2520success%2520typically%2520involves%2520more%2520than%2520a%2520single%2520setback.%2520%25E2%2580%259CYou%2520don%25E2%2580%2599t%2520just%2520fail%2520once,%25E2%2580%259D%2520Wang%2520says.%2520%25E2%2580%259CYou%2520fail%2520over%2520and%2520over.%25E2%2580%259D%2520And%2520while%2520that%2520litany%2520of%2520failures%2520may%2520make%2520the%2520Edisons%2520of%2520the%2520world%2520better%2520off,%2520it%2520seems%2520to%2520thwart%2520many%2520other%2520people.%250ATo%2520understand%2520why,%2520Wang%2520and%2520his%2520colleagues%2520needed%2520a%2520lot%2520of%2520information%2520about%2520the%2520process%2520of%2520falling,%2520getting%2520back%2520up,%2520and%2520trying%2520again.%250AThey%2520turned%2520to%2520three%2520massive%2520data%2520sets,%2520each%2520containing%2520information%2520about%2520very%2520distinct%2520types%2520of%2520failure%2520and%2520success:%2520776,721%2520grant%2520applications%2520submitted%2520to%2520the%2520National%2520Institutes%2520of%2520Health%2520(NIH)%2520between%25201985%2520and%25202015;%2520the%2520National%2520Venture%2520Capital%2520Association%25E2%2580%2599s%2520database%2520of%2520all%252058,111%2520startups%2520to%2520receive%2520venture-capital%2520funding%2520from%25201970%2520to%25202016;%2520and%2520the%2520Global%2520Terrorism%2520Database,%2520which%2520includes%2520170,350%2520attacks%2520between%25201970%2520and%25202016.%250AThese%2520sources%2520allowed%2520the%2520researchers%2520to%2520track%2520groups%2520and%2520individuals%2520as%2520they%2520made%2520repeated%2520attempts%2520over%2520time%2520to%2520achieve%2520a%2520goal:%2520obtain%2520grant%2520funding,%2520lead%2520their%2520company%2520to%2520get%2520acquired%2520at%2520high%2520values%2520or%2520achieve%2520an%2520IPO,%2520or,%2520in%2520the%2520case%2520of%2520terrorist%2520organizations,%2520execute%2520an%2520attack%2520with%2520at%2520least%2520one%2520fatality%25E2%2580%2594a%2520grim%2520measure%2520of%2520success,%2520to%2520be%2520sure.%250AThe%2520three%2520domains%2520%25E2%2580%259Ccan%25E2%2580%2599t%2520be%2520more%2520different,%25E2%2580%259D%2520Wang%2520says,%2520%25E2%2580%259Cbut%2520as%2520different%2520as%2520they%2520seem,%2520what%25E2%2580%2599s%2520interesting%2520is%2520that%2520they%2520all%2520turn%2520out%2520to%2520show%2520very%2520similar,%2520predictable%2520patterns.%25E2%2580%259D%250AWhat%2520Makes%2520You%2520Successful:%2520Luck%2520or%2520Learning%253F%250AWith%2520data%2520in%2520hand,%2520the%2520team%2520began%2520thinking%2520about%2520success%2520and%2520failure%2520at%2520the%2520simplest%2520level.%2520Success,%2520they%2520theorized,%2520must%2520be%2520the%2520result%2520of%2520one%2520of%2520two%2520basic%2520phenomena:%2520luck%2520or%2520learning.%2520People%2520who%2520become%2520successful%2520in%2520a%2520given%2520area%2520are%2520either%2520improving%2520steadily%2520over%2520time,%2520or%2520they%2520are%2520the%2520beneficiaries%2520of%2520chance.%2520So%2520the%2520researchers%2520tested%2520both%2520theories.%250AIf%2520wins%2520are%2520primarily%2520the%2520result%2520of%2520chance,%2520the%2520team%2520figured,%2520all%2520attempts%2520are%2520equally%2520likely%2520to%2520succeed%2520or%2520fail%25E2%2580%2594just%2520like%2520a%2520coin%2520toss,%2520where%2520what%2520happened%2520before%2520doesn%25E2%2580%2599t%2520much%2520influence%2520what%2520happens%2520next.%2520That%2520means%2520the%2520typical%2520person%25E2%2580%2599s%2520hundredth%2520attempt%2520won%25E2%2580%2599t%2520be%2520any%2520more%2520successful%2520than%2520their%2520first,%2520since%2520individuals%2520are%2520not%2520systematically%2520improving.%250ASo%2520the%2520researchers%2520looked%2520at%2520the%2520first%2520attempt%2520and%2520the%2520penultimate%2520attempt%2520(the%2520one%2520right%2520before%2520a%2520win)%2520for%2520each%2520aspiring%2520scientist,%2520entrepreneur,%2520and%2520terrorist%2520in%2520their%2520dataset.%2520To%2520measure%2520improvement%2520(or%2520lack%2520thereof)%2520over%2520time,%2520the%2520researchers%2520looked%2520at%2520changes%2520in%2520how%2520the%2520scientists%25E2%2580%2599%2520grant%2520applications%2520were%2520rated,%2520the%2520amount%2520of%2520venture%2520funding%2520the%2520startups%2520received,%2520and%2520the%2520number%2520of%2520individuals%2520wounded%2520in%2520terrorists%25E2%2580%2599%2520attacks.%250AAnalysis%2520revealed%2520that%2520the%2520chance%2520theory%2520doesn%25E2%2580%2599t%2520hold%2520up.%2520In%2520all%2520three%2520datasets,%2520an%2520individual%25E2%2580%2599s%2520second-to-last%2520attempt%2520did%2520tend%2520have%2520a%2520higher%2520probability%2520of%2520success%2520than%2520their%2520very%2520first%2520effort.%250AYet%2520people%2520weren%25E2%2580%2599t%2520learning%2520in%2520the%2520way%2520the%2520researchers%2520had%2520expected.%2520The%2520classic%2520idea%2520of%2520the%2520learning%2520curve%2520says%2520that%2520the%2520more%2520you%2520do%2520something,%2520the%2520higher%2520your%2520proficiency%2520gets.%2520So%2520if%2520everyone%2520in%2520the%2520dataset%2520was%2520reliably%2520learning%2520from%2520their%2520prior%2520failures,%2520their%2520odds%2520of%2520success%2520should%2520increase%2520dramatically%2520with%2520each%2520new%2520attempt,%2520leading%2520to%2520short-lived%2520failure%2520streaks%2520before%2520success.%250ABut%2520the%2520data%2520revealed%2520much%2520longer%2520streaks%2520than%2520the%2520researchers%2520anticipated.%250A%25E2%2580%259CAlthough%2520your%2520performance%2520improves%2520over%2520time,%2520you%2520still%2520fail%2520more%2520than%2520we%2520would%2520expect%2520you%2520to,%25E2%2580%259D%2520Wang%2520explains.%2520%25E2%2580%259CThat%2520suggests%2520that%2520you%2520are%2520stuck%2520somewhere%25E2%2580%2594that%2520you%2520are%2520trying%2520but%2520not%2520making%2520progress.%25E2%2580%259D%250AIn%2520other%2520words,%2520neither%2520of%2520the%2520two%2520theories%2520could%2520account%2520for%2520the%2520dynamics%2520underlying%2520repeated%2520failures.%2520So%2520the%2520researchers%2520decided%2520to%2520build%2520a%2520model%2520that%2520accounted%2520for%2520that.%250AA%2520Surefire%2520Predictor%2520of%2520Success%250AThis%2520model%2520assumes%2520that%2520every%2520attempt%2520has%2520several%2520components%25E2%2580%2594like%2520the%2520introduction%2520and%2520budget%2520sections%2520of%2520a%2520grant%2520proposal,%2520for%2520instance,%2520or%2520the%2520location%2520and%2520tactics%2520used%2520in%2520a%2520terrorist%2520attack.%2520Importantly,%2520even%2520if%2520an%2520attempt%2520fails%2520overall,%2520some%2520of%2520its%2520components%2520may%2520still%2520have%2520been%2520good.%2520When%2520mounting%2520a%2520new%2520attempt,%2520an%2520individual%2520has%2520to%2520choose,%2520for%2520each%2520component,%2520whether%2520to%2520go%2520back%2520to%2520the%2520drawing%2520board%2520or%2520to%2520improve%2520upon%2520a%2520version%2520from%2520a%2520prior%2520(failed)%2520attempt.%250ASome%2520people%2520learn%2520from%2520their%2520failed%2520attempts%2520more%2520than%2520others,%2520with%2520those%2520who%2520%25E2%2580%259Clearn%2520more%25E2%2580%259D%2520incorporating%2520more%2520components%2520of%2520their%2520failed%2520attempts%2520into%2520their%2520later%2520attempts.%250AA%2520person%2520evaluates%2520the%2520components%2520of%2520their%2520past%2520tries%2520based%2520on%2520feedback%2520from%2520others%2520(for%2520the%2520people%2520in%2520Wang%25E2%2580%2599s%2520analysis,%2520feedback%2520might%2520come%2520from%2520the%2520NIH,%2520venture%2520capitalists,%2520or%2520higher-ups%2520in%2520a%2520terrorist%2520organization).%250ABut%2520the%2520model%2520acknowledges%2520that%2520some%2520people%2520learn%2520from%2520their%2520failed%2520attempts%2520more%2520than%2520others,%2520with%2520those%2520who%2520%25E2%2580%259Clearn%2520more%25E2%2580%259D%2520incorporating%2520more%2520components%2520of%2520their%2520failed%2520attempts%2520into%2520their%2520later%2520attempts.%250AAt%2520one%2520extreme,%2520the%2520very%2520worst%2520learners%2520incorporate%2520zero%2520information%2520from%2520their%2520previous%2520tries,%2520starting%2520from%2520scratch%2520on%2520every%2520component%2520every%2520time.%2520At%2520the%2520other%2520extreme%2520are%2520perfect%2520learners,%2520who%2520consider%2520all%2520of%2520their%2520past%2520failures%2520with%2520each%2520fresh%2520attempt.%2520Most%2520people%2520are%2520somewhere%2520between%2520these%2520two%2520extremes.%250AWhile%2520perfect%2520learners%2520will%2520likely%2520achieve%2520success%2520quickly,%2520the%2520model%2520predicts,%2520the%2520worst%2520learners%2520have%2520a%2520low%2520chance%2520of%2520success%25E2%2580%2594since%2520they%2520never%2520learn%2520anything,%2520they%2520simply%2520%25E2%2580%259Cthrash%2520around%2520for%2520new%2520versions,%25E2%2580%259D%2520Wang%2520says,%2520wasting%2520valuable%2520time%2520going%2520back%2520to%2520the%2520drawing%2520board%2520again%2520and%2520again.%250AThe%2520researchers%2520tested%2520this%2520model%2520with%2520their%2520data,%2520using%2520average%2520time%2520between%2520attempts%2520as%2520a%2520proxy%2520for%2520an%2520individual%25E2%2580%2599s%2520learning%2520ability%2520(since%2520better%2520learners%2520will%2520start%2520from%2520scratch%2520on%2520fewer%2520components,%2520allowing%2520them%2520to%2520produce%2520new%2520iterations%2520quickly).%250AWhat%2520they%2520found%2520was%2520a%2520surprising%2520relationship%2520between%2520learning%2520and%2520eventual%2520victory.%2520It%25E2%2580%2599s%2520not%2520the%2520case%2520that%2520each%2520additional%2520unit%2520of%2520learning%2520boosted%2520one%25E2%2580%2599s%2520odds%2520of%2520success%2520equally.%2520Rather,%2520there%25E2%2580%2599s%2520a%2520singular%2520learning%2520threshold%2520that%2520separates%2520eventual%2520successes%2520from%2520the%2520rest.%250AWang%2520compares%2520this%2520threshold%2520to%2520the%2520transition%2520between%2520water%2520and%2520ice.%2520%25E2%2580%259CImagine%2520I%2520go%2520from%2520-5%2520to%2520-4%2520degrees%2520Celsius,%25E2%2580%259D%2520he%2520explains.%2520%25E2%2580%259CNothing%2520happens.%2520The%2520ice%2520stays%2520as%2520ice.%25E2%2580%259D%2520But%2520the%2520moment%2520the%2520temperature%2520hits%2520a%2520particular%2520point,%2520it%2520begins%2520to%2520melt.%250ASimilarly,%2520if%2520someone%25E2%2580%2599s%2520learning%2520ability%2520is%2520below%2520the%2520threshold,%2520it%25E2%2580%2599s%2520as%2520if%2520they%2520were%2520learning%2520nothing%2520at%2520all.%2520They%2520may%2520improve%2520slightly%2520over%2520time,%2520Wang%2520says,%2520but%2520they%2520will%2520never%2520retain%2520enough%2520good%2520components%2520to%2520produce%2520a%2520full-throated%2520success.%250ABut%2520those%2520beyond%2520the%2520threshold%2520should%2520retain%2520enough%2520lessons%2520to%2520all%2520but%2520guarantee%2520success.%2520They%2520produce%2520new%2520iterations%2520faster%2520and%2520faster%2520over%2520time,%2520until%2520they%2520eventually%2520have%2520a%2520successful%2520one.%250AIn%2520practical%2520terms,%2520this%2520means%2520you%2520don%25E2%2580%2599t%2520need%2520to%2520learn%2520from%2520all%2520of%2520your%2520past%2520experiences%2520in%2520order%2520to%2520eventually%2520succeed,%2520Wang%2520explains.%2520But%2520there%2520is%2520a%2520minimum%2520number%2520of%2520failures%2520you%2520need%2520to%2520learn.%2520While%2520that%2520is%2520not%2520easily%2520quantifiable%2520in%2520every%2520case,%2520the%2520researchers%2520did%2520pinpoint%2520the%2520threshold%2520for%2520NIH%2520grants%2520at%2520around%25203.%250AHow%2520You%2520Fail%2520Determines%2520Whether%2520You%25E2%2580%2599ll%2520Succeed%250AThe%2520research%2520dismisses%2520the%2520common%2520idea%2520that%2520success%2520is%2520a%2520product%2520of%2520sheer%2520chance%2520and%2520also%2520sheds%2520new%2520light%2520on%2520what%2520it%2520really%2520takes%2520for%2520an%2520amateur%2520to%2520become%2520a%2520winner.%250ATo%2520simply%2520%25E2%2580%259Ctry,%2520try%2520again,%25E2%2580%259D%2520for%2520example,%2520is%2520not%2520enough.%2520The%2520data%2520show%2520that%2520individuals%2520below%2520the%2520learning%2520threshold%2520made%2520just%2520as%2520many%2520attempts%2520as%2520the%2520those%2520above,%2520and%2520likely%2520worked%2520even%2520harder,%2520since%2520they%2520insisted%2520on%2520making%2520changes%2520to%2520their%2520perfectly%2520good%2520earlier%2520attempts.%2520But%2520this%2520hard%2520work%2520was%2520fruitless,%2520since%2520it%2520wasn%25E2%2580%2599t%2520incorporating%2520past%2520tries.%250AFor%2520Wang,%2520the%2520lesson%2520is%2520clear:%2520people%2520should%2520place%2520a%2520high%2520premium%2520on%2520feedback,%2520as%2520well%2520as%2520on%2520lessons%2520they%2520learn%2520through%2520failure.%2520%25E2%2580%259CThese%2520are%2520two%2520very%2520valuable%2520assets%2520you%2520now%2520have%2520to%2520launch%2520another%2520attempt,%25E2%2580%259D%2520he%2520says.%2520But%2520the%2520study%2520reveals%2520that%2520they%25E2%2580%2599re%2520only%2520valuable%2520if%2520you%2520can%2520incorporate%2520them%2520into%2520new%2520attempts,%2520bearing%2520out%2520the%2520Silicon%2520Valley%2520mantra%2520that%2520%25E2%2580%259Cfailing%2520better%25E2%2580%259D%2520is%2520key%2520to%2520success.%250AThe%2520study%2520also%2520dispels%2520some%2520of%2520the%2520mystery%2520behind%2520who%2520succeeds%2520and%2520who%2520doesn%25E2%2580%2599t.%2520The%2520researchers%2520found%2520that%2520the%2520learning%2520ability%2520of%2520a%2520given%2520entrepreneur,%2520scientist,%2520or%2520terrorist%2520can%2520be%2520discerned%2520by%2520simply%2520measuring%2520how%2520much%2520time%2520passes%2520between%2520their%2520first%2520few%2520attempts.%2520As%2520a%2520result,%2520their%2520model%2520was%2520able%2520to%2520accurately%2520predict%2520which%2520entrepreneurs,%2520scientists,%2520and%2520terrorists%2520would%2520eventually%2520succeed%2520long%2520before%2520any%2520outward%2520signs%2520of%2520success%2520appear.%250A%25E2%2580%259CThomas%2520Edison%2520said,%2520%25E2%2580%2598people%2520give%2520up%2520because%2520they%2520don%25E2%2580%2599t%2520know%2520how%2520close%2520they%2520are%2520to%2520success,%25E2%2580%2599%25E2%2580%259D%2520Wang%2520explains.%2520%25E2%2580%259CWell,%2520what%2520the%2520paper%2520contributes%2520is,%2520now%2520we%2520know.%2520Because%2520if%2520we%2520have%2520data%2520about%2520how%2520you%2520fail,%2520we%2520have%2520a%2520better%2520idea%2520of%2520where%2520you%25E2%2580%2599re%2520headed.%25E2%2580%259D%250AFEATURED%2520FACULTY%250AYang%2520Wang%250APreviously%2520a%2520Postdoctoral%2520Fellow%2520at%2520Kellogg%250A%250ADashun%2520Wang%250AProfessor%2520of%2520Management%2520%2526%2520Organizations;%2520Professor%2520of%2520Industrial%2520Engineering%2520%2526%2520Management%2520Sciences%2520(Courtesy),%2520Director,%2520Center%2520for%2520Science%2520of%2520Science%2520and%2520Innovation%2520(CSSI),%2520Co-Director%2520for%2520the%2520Ryan%2520Institute%2520on%2520Complexity%250A%250AABOUT%2520THE%2520WRITER%250ASusie%2520Allen%2520is%2520a%2520freelance%2520writer%2520in%2520Chicago.%250AABOUT%2520THE%2520RESEARCH%250AYin,%2520Yian,%2520Yang%2520Wang,%2520James%2520A.%2520Evans,%2520and%2520Dashun%2520Wang.%25202019.%2520%25E2%2580%259CQuantifying%2520the%2520Dynamics%2520of%2520Failure%2520across%2520Science,%2520Startups%2520and%2520Security.%2522%2520Nature.%2520575:%2520190%25E2%2580%2593194.%250ARead%2520the%2520original%250AAdd%2520Insight%2520to%2520your%2520inbox.%250A%250AKellogg%2520Insight%2520Weekly%250AA%2520roundup%2520of%2520the%2520latest%2520research%2520and%2520ideas.%250A%250AThe%2520Insightful%2520Leader%2520Weekly%250AA%2520focus%2520on%2520leadership%2520advice%2520and%2520research.%2520View%2520archive%250A%250ALatest%2520from%2520Our%2520Podcast%2520Occasionally%250AA%2520round-up%2520of%2520recent%2520Insightful%2520Leader%2520episodes.%250A%250A%250AThis%2520website%2520uses%2520cookies%2520and%2520similar%2520technologies%2520to%2520analyze%2520and%2520optimize%2520site%2520usage.%2520By%2520continuing%2520to%2520use%2520our%2520websites,%2520you%2520consent%2520to%2520this.%2520For%2520more%2520information,%2520please%2520read%2520our%2520Privacy%2520Statement.%250ARELATED%250AEarly%2520Career%2520Failures%2520Can%2520Make%2520You%2520Stronger%2520in%2520the%2520Long%2520Run%250ANobel%2520Prize%2520Winners%25E2%2580%2594They%25E2%2580%2599re%2520Just%2520Like%2520Us!%250AMore%2520in%2520Business%2520Insights%2520Innovation%250A%250APodcast:%2520Need%2520Product%2520Inspiration%253F%2520Meet%2520Your%2520Customer%2520in%2520the%2520Wild.%250ALINKS%250ATRANSLATIONS%250AFOLLOW%250ACONTACT%250ANEWSLETTER%2520SIGNUP%250A%250A%250A%250A%25C2%25A9%2520Kellogg%2520School%2520of%2520Management,%2520Northwestern%2520University.%250AAll%2520Rights%2520Reserved.%2520Privacy%2520Policy.%250A%250AAdd%2520Insight%2520to%2520your%2520inbox.%250AWe%25E2%2580%2599ll%2520send%2520you%2520one%2520email%2520a%2520week%2520with%2520content%2520you%2520actually%2520want%2520to%2520read,%2520curated%2520by%2520the%2520Insight%2520team.%250A%250AKellogg%2520Insight%2520Weekly%250A%250AThe%2520Insightful%2520Leader%2520Weekly%250A%250AThe%2520Latest%2520from%2520Our%2520Podcast%2520Occasionally%250A%250A%250AI%25E2%2580%2599m%2520already%2520a%2520subscriber.%250AThis%2520website%2520uses%2520cookies%2520and%2520similar%2520technologies%2520to%2520analyze%2520and%2520optimize%2520site%2520usage.%2520By%2520continuing%2520to%2520use%2520our%2520websites,%2520you%2520consent%2520to%2520this.%2520For%2520more%2520information,%2520please%2520read%2520our%2520Privacy%2520Statement.%250A