You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Q:

SASL auth to LDAP behind HAPROXY with name mismatches

My kerberos domain in MYEXAMPLE.ORG, but servers are located in the dmz-int.example.org dns zone.
LDAP server is b1.dmz-int.example.org; its keytab include:

udo ktutil -k /etc/krb5.keytab list
/etc/krb5.keytab:

Vno  Type                     Principal                              Aliases
  7  arcfour-hmac-md5         <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
  7  aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96  <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
  7  aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96  <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
  7  arcfour-hmac-md5         host/b1.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96  host/b1.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96  host/b1.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  arcfour-hmac-md5         ldap/b1.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96  ldap/b1.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96  ldap/b1.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  arcfour-hmac-md5         ldap/ldap.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96  ldap/ldap.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96  ldap/ldap.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  arcfour-hmac-md5         ldap/ldap.unimore.it@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes128-cts-hmac-sha1-96  ldap/ldap.unimore.it@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
  7  aes256-cts-hmac-sha1-96  ldap/ldap.unimore.it@MYEXAMPLE.ORG

ldap2.myexample.org is a CNAME of b1.dmz-int.example.org
Now I can connect with GSSAPI to LDAP server:
$ kinit
$ ldapsearch -ZZ -h b1.dmz-int.example.org 'uid=test'
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
SASL username: <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SASL SSF: 56
SASL data security layer installed.
[...]
$ ldapsearch -ZZ -h ldap2.myexample.org 'uid=test'
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
SASL username: <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
SASL SSF: 56
SASL data security layer installed.
[...]
$ klist
Credentials cache: FILE:/tmp/krb5cc_1000
    Principal: <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>

Issued                Expires               Principal
Sep  6 09:03:35 2016  Sep  6 19:03:32 2016  krbtgt/MYEXAMPLE.ORG@MYEXAMPLE.ORG
Sep  6 09:03:39 2016  Sep  6 19:03:32 2016  ldap/b1.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG

Looks fine.
Now comes the proxy.
Proxy A record is ldap.dmz-int.example.org and it has a CNAME as ldap.myexample.org.
Proxy is a HAPROXY layer 4 for ports 389 and 636. Without SASL it works fine.

$ ldapsearch -ZZ -h ldap.myexample.org 'uid=test'
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Local error (-2)
        additional info: SASL(-1): generic failure: GSSAPI Error:  Miscellaneous failure (see text) (Matching credential (ldap/ldap.dmz-int.example.org@DMZ-INT.EXAMPLE.ORG) not found)
$ ldapsearch -h ldap.dmz-int.example.org 'uid=test'
SASL/GSSAPI authentication started
ldap_sasl_interactive_bind_s: Local error (-2)
        additional info: SASL(-1): generic failure: GSSAPI Error:  Miscellaneous failure (see text) (Matching credential (ldap/ldap.dmz-int.example.org@DMZ-INT.EXAMPLE.ORG) not found)

And now SASL doesn't work. Do I need an extra SPN in the server keytab? Do I need some dns fixes? Why the proxy query looks for the: ldap/ldap.dmz-int.example.org@DMZ-INT.EXAMPLE.ORG principal and not ldap/ldap.dmz-int.example.org@MYEXAMPLE.ORG? 
As a reference, follows the haproxy conf file:

$ cat /etc/haproxy/haproxy.cfg
global
        log /dev/log    local0
#       log /dev/log    local1 notice
        chroot /var/lib/haproxy
        stats socket /run/haproxy/admin.sock mode 660 level admin
        stats timeout 30s
        user haproxy
        group haproxy
        daemon

        # Default SSL material locations
        ca-base /etc/ssl/certs
        crt-base /etc/ssl/private

        # Default ciphers to use on SSL-enabled listening sockets.
        # For more information, see ciphers(1SSL). This list is from:
        #  https://hynek.me/articles/hardening-your-web-servers-ssl-ciphers/
        ssl-default-bind-ciphers ECDH+AESGCM:DH+AESGCM:ECDH+AES256:DH+AES256:ECDH+AES128:DH+AES:ECDH+3DES:DH+3DES:RSA+AESGCM:RSA+AES:RSA+3DES:!aNULL:!MD5:!DSS
        ssl-default-bind-options no-sslv3

# LDAP and LDAP/STARTTLS
frontend ldap_service_front
  log           global
  mode                  tcp
  bind                  *:389
  description           LDAP Service
  option                socket-stats
  option                tcpka
  option                tcplog
  timeout client        10s
  default_backend       ldap_service_back

backend ldap_service_back
  log           global
  server                ldap-1 b1.myexample.org:389 check fall 1 rise 1 inter 2s
  server                ldap-2 b2.myexample.org:389 check fall 1 rise 1 inter 2s
  mode                  tcp
  balance               leastconn
  option                tcpka
  option                ldap-check
  timeout server        10s
  timeout connect       1s

A:

You'll want ignore_acceptor_hostname = true in either [libdefaults] or the appropriate subsection of [appdefaults].

ignore_acceptor_hostname
    When accepting GSSAPI or krb5 security contexts for host-based service principals, ignore any hostname passed by the calling application, and allow clients to authenticate to any service principal in the keytab matching  the  service  name and realm name (if given).  This option can improve the administrative flexibility of server applications on multihomed hosts, but could compromise the security of virtual hosting environments.
                The default value is false.  New in release 1.10.