1_ Translate the following legal text into colloquial Farsi. 2_ Place the Farsi and English text with a single line between each other, that is, the English text is a single line.  A space and then a translation line and...
            4- Using legal language for Persian translation 5- Continue to the end of the text

               .Maddison v. Alderson (1883)
Mrs M was employed as housekeeper to Mr A, a farmer, for a number of years. A made an oral promise that if M would carry on working for the rest of A's life without wages he would by his will leave her a life interest in the farm. A made a will in those terms, but it was declared void. M sued, alleging part perform- ance. Held: that there were many reasons why M might have worked without wages. The work was equivocal; for example, she might have wanted a home. It did not follow that she was entitled to a life interest.8
Contractual
capacity
The general rule is that any person, of whatever nationality or sex, may enter into a binding contract. To this rule there are certain exceptions. First, we remember that the word 'person' includes both natural and artificial (or juristic) persons such as corporations. By the very nature of things certain special rules apply to these. Second, there are special rules of common law and statute law formed for the protection of certain classes of person who by reason of youth or deficiency in mental ability and understanding might be taken advantage of by experienced and mature adults.
The special rules affecting each class of person are detailed below.Infants or minors
As we have noted (see p. 88), a person attains his or her majority ‘at the com- mencement of the relevant anniversary of the date of his or her birth’ (Family Law Reform Act, 1969). From the moment of reaching 18 a person assumes the full responsibilities of an adult.
Certain contracts made by a minor are classified as (a) void, (b) valid or (c) voidable.(a) Void contracts
As a result of the recommendations of the Law Commission published in their Report on Minors Contracts (Law Com. No. 134) the Minors' Contracts Act 1987 was passed with the aim of removing certain restrictions on the enforceability of contracts entered into by minors.
Previously, parts of the law of contract relating to minors, particularly those classified as 'Void' contracts, were governed by the Infants Relief Act, 1874; Section 1 of which rendered 'absolutely void' all contracts with minors for the payment of money lent, or for goods supplied or to be supplied (other than contracts for 'necessaries' - the legal meaning of which is explained below) and all accounts stated with minors.
The effect of the Minors' Contracts Act, 1987 is to disapply (i.e. repeal) the Infants Relief Act, 1874. As a consequence, Section 1 of the 1874 Act no longer governs these contracts which are now subject to the rules of common law.
Section 1 of the Minors' Contracts Act, 1987 also repeals Section 5 of the Betting and Loans (Infants) Act, 1892, which rendered void any new agree- ment by a minor, after attaining full age, to repay a loan obtained during their minority; it also invalidated any negotiable instrument given in connec- tion with such agreement. By disapplying this provision the 1987 Act makes any future such agreement and any negotiable agreement effective. Section 2 of the Minors' Contracts Act 1987 provides that where:
(i)
a guarantee is given in respect of an obligation of a party; and (ii) the obligation is unenforceable against him (or he repudiates the con- tract) because he was a minor when the contract was made, the guarantee shall not, for that reason alone, be unenforceable against the guarantor.