can i generate a marking guide based on 4 crietria that cover all the presentations? (five parts) following the guide below 

The Assignment
This assessment evaluates how students have met the learning outcomes of the module. The assessment consists of a narrated PowerPoint presentation (approximately 15 minutes) covering different aspects of data analytics and decision-making. Below is a step-by-step breakdown of the components and guidelines for the assessment.
Task
Step 1
Develop and record a narrated PowerPoint presentation to address the following five tasks.
For technical guidance, see how to record a slide show with narration and slide timings.Links to an external site.
Task 1 - Identify Structured and Unstructured Data Sources
•	Identify Examples: Share specific examples of both structured (e.g., databases, spreadsheets) and unstructured data (e.g., emails, social media posts) from your professional experience. 
•	Evaluate Benefits and Limitations: Discuss how these data types benefit your decision-making process and any limitations they present in your industry or role.
Task 2 - Evaluating Data Sources
•	Identify Secondary Data Sources: Find secondary data sources relevant to a specific industry or topic. 
•	Evaluate Data: Assess each data source based on relevance, reliability, completeness, timeliness, accessibility, and ethical considerations. 
•	Discuss Usefulness: Explain how these factors influence the data's usefulness for decision-making.
Task 3 - Creating a Data Management Plan
•	Outline the Plan: Present a customised data management plan for your workplace. 
•	Steps and Processes: Include steps for organising, documenting, storing, and sharing data. 
•	Address Needs and Challenges: Explain how your plan addresses the unique needs and challenges of your organisation or industry.
Task 4 - Making Data-driven Decisions
•	Apply Steps: Apply the steps of data-driven decision-making in your workplace context. 
•	Reflect on Process: Reflect on your decision-making process, considering rational models, cognitive biases, and emotional influences. 
•	Data-Based Evidence: Discuss how data-based evidence-informed your decisions and any challenges faced.
Task 5 - Communicating Data-driven Decisions
•	Explain Decisions: Clearly explain the decisions made based on data-based evidence. 
•	Highlight Communication Importance: Emphasise the importance of clear communication to stakeholders. 
•	Provide Examples: Give examples of effective communication strategies you would use to convey decisions within your organization. 
Step 2
Please do not export your presentation as a video (.mp4 file). Instead, you should save your presentation as a PowerPoint (.pptx) file with your audio and video embedded within it.
Step 3
Submit your narrated presentation (.pptx file) in the drop-box below.  
Canvas has a file upload limit of 500MB. If your presentation exceeds this, follow the steps in the following guide to reduce file size - Reduce the file size of your PowerPoint presentationsLinks to an external site..

1.	All criteria should be weighted to give the students an indication of the relative value of each aspect of the assessment.

2.	For Level 1 assignments, up to 8 criteria are acceptable and this plurality is strongly recommended as it affords us a chance to guide the candidate through the minutiae of assessment requirements. This number should reduce to 4 or 5 criteria for higher levels.
                                                                                                                                                  
3.	At all levels (but especially higher levels) care must be taken NOT to create a criterion in which several disparate requirements are mentioned, yet where specific ‘reward’ for each of these separate ‘subcomponents’ is not made clear. 
 
4.	For each level (1 to 4) the criteria MUST adhere to SCQF guidelines (Levels 7 to 10)
.
5.	Expression of each marking criterion should be kept simple. Any extra information or supplementary guidance may be given in the form of an additional ‘indicative answer’ section

6.	Expression of each criterion must be descriptive and NOT directive – thus, imperative verb forms may not be used. In the same vein, it is inappropriate to pose questions to the candidates in the marking criteria. It should be borne in mind that the Marking Criteria are intended solely as an objective account of how marks are to be allocated)*

7.	NO qualitative elements may appear in a marking criterion (e.g. in the first item in the sample above, ‘Fully addresses the question’ would not be acceptable)