You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


// Copyright 2009 The Go Authors. All rights reserved.
// Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style
// license that can be found in the LICENSE file.

// HTTP Response reading and parsing.

package http

import (
	"bufio"
	"bytes"
	"crypto/tls"
	"errors"
	"fmt"
	"io"
	"net/textproto"
	"net/url"
	"strconv"
	"strings"

	"golang.org/x/net/http/httpguts"
)

var respExcludeHeader = map[string]bool{
	"Content-Length":    true,
	"Transfer-Encoding": true,
	"Trailer":           true,
}

// Response represents the response from an HTTP request.
//
// The Client and Transport return Responses from servers once
// the response headers have been received. The response body
// is streamed on demand as the Body field is read.
type Response struct {
	Status     string // e.g. "200 OK"
	StatusCode int    // e.g. 200
	Proto      string // e.g. "HTTP/1.0"
	ProtoMajor int    // e.g. 1
	ProtoMinor int    // e.g. 0

	// Header maps header keys to values. If the response had multiple
	// headers with the same key, they may be concatenated, with comma
	// delimiters.  (RFC 7230, section 3.2.2 requires that multiple headers
	// be semantically equivalent to a comma-delimited sequence.) When
	// Header values are duplicated by other fields in this struct (e.g.,
	// ContentLength, TransferEncoding, Trailer), the field values are
	// authoritative.
	//
	// Keys in the map are canonicalized (see CanonicalHeaderKey).
	Header Header

	// Body represents the response body.
	//
	// The response body is streamed on demand as the Body field
	// is read. If the network connection fails or the server
	// terminates the response, Body.Read calls return an error.
	//
	// The http Client and Transport guarantee that Body is always
	// non-nil, even on responses without a body or responses with
	// a zero-length body. It is the caller's responsibility to
	// close Body. The default HTTP client's Transport may not
	// reuse HTTP/1.x "keep-alive" TCP connections if the Body is
	// not read to completion and closed.
	//
	// The Body is automatically dechunked if the server replied
	// with a "chunked" Transfer-Encoding.
	//
	// As of Go 1.12, the Body will also implement io.Writer
	// on a successful "101 Switching Protocols" response,
	// as used by WebSockets and HTTP/2's "h2c" mode.
	Body io.ReadCloser

	// ContentLength records the length of the associated content. The
	// value -1 indicates that the length is unknown. Unless Request.Method
	// is "HEAD", values >= 0 indicate that the given number of bytes may
	// be read from Body.
	ContentLength int64

	// Contains transfer encodings from outer-most to inner-most. Value is
	// nil, means that "identity" encoding is used.
	TransferEncoding []string

	// Close records whether the header directed that the connection be
	// closed after reading Body. The value is advice for clients: neither
	// ReadResponse nor Response.Write ever closes a connection.
	Close bool

	// Uncompressed reports whether the response was sent compressed but
	// was decompressed by the http package. When true, reading from
	// Body yields the uncompressed content instead of the compressed
	// content actually set from the server, ContentLength is set to -1,
	// and the "Content-Length" and "Content-Encoding" fields are deleted
	// from the responseHeader. To get the original response from
	// the server, set Transport.DisableCompression to true.
	Uncompressed bool

	// Trailer maps trailer keys to values in the same
	// format as Header.
	//
	// The Trailer initially contains only nil values, one for
	// each key specified in the server's "Trailer" header
	// value. Those values are not added to Header.
	//
	// Trailer must not be accessed concurrently with Read calls
	// on the Body.
	//
	// After Body.Read has returned io.EOF, Trailer will contain
	// any trailer values sent by the server.
	Trailer Header

	// Request is the request that was sent to obtain this Response.
	// Request's Body is nil (having already been consumed).
	// This is only populated for Client requests.
	Request *Request

	// TLS contains information about the TLS connection on which the
	// response was received. It is nil for unencrypted responses.
	// The pointer is shared between responses and should not be
	// modified.
	TLS *tls.ConnectionState
}

// Cookies parses and returns the cookies set in the Set-Cookie headers.
func (r *Response) Cookies() []*Cookie {
	return readSetCookies(r.Header)
}

// ErrNoLocation is returned by Response's Location method
// when no Location header is present.
var ErrNoLocation = errors.New("http: no Location header in response")

// Location returns the URL of the response's "Location" header,
// if present. Relative redirects are resolved relative to
// the Response's Request. ErrNoLocation is returned if no
// Location header is present.
func (r *Response) Location() (*url.URL, error) {
	lv := r.Header.Get("Location")
	if lv == "" {
		return nil, ErrNoLocation
	}
	if r.Request != nil && r.Request.URL != nil {
		return r.Request.URL.Parse(lv)
	}
	return url.Parse(lv)
}

// ReadResponse reads and returns an HTTP response from r.
// The req parameter optionally specifies the Request that corresponds
// to this Response. If nil, a GET request is assumed.
// Clients must call resp.Body.Close when finished reading resp.Body.
// After that call, clients can inspect resp.Trailer to find key/value
// pairs included in the response trailer.
func ReadResponse(r *bufio.Reader, req *Request) (*Response, error) {
	tp := textproto.NewReader(r)
	resp := &Response{
		Request: req,
	}

	// Parse the first line of the response.
	line, err := tp.ReadLine()
	if err != nil {
		if err == io.EOF {
			err = io.ErrUnexpectedEOF
		}
		return nil, err
	}
	if i := strings.IndexByte(line, ' '); i == -1 {
		return nil, badStringError("malformed HTTP response", line)
	} else {
		resp.Proto = line[:i]
		resp.Status = strings.TrimLeft(line[i+1:], " ")
	}
	statusCode := resp.Status
	if i := strings.IndexByte(resp.Status, ' '); i != -1 {
		statusCode = resp.Status[:i]
	}
	if len(statusCode) != 3 {
		return nil, badStringError("malformed HTTP status code", statusCode)
	}
	resp.StatusCode, err = strconv.Atoi(statusCode)
	if err != nil || resp.StatusCode < 0 {
		return nil, badStringError("malformed HTTP status code", statusCode)
	}
	var ok bool
	if resp.ProtoMajor, resp.ProtoMinor, ok = ParseHTTPVersion(resp.Proto); !ok {
		return nil, badStringError("malformed HTTP version", resp.Proto)
	}

	// Parse the response headers.
	mimeHeader, err := tp.ReadMIMEHeader()
	if err != nil {
		if err == io.EOF {
			err = io.ErrUnexpectedEOF
		}
		return nil, err
	}
	resp.Header = Header(mimeHeader)

	fixPragmaCacheControl(resp.Header)

	err = readTransfer(resp, r)
	if err != nil {
		return nil, err
	}

	return resp, nil
}

// RFC 7234, section 5.4: Should treat
//	Pragma: no-cache
// like
//	Cache-Control: no-cache
func fixPragmaCacheControl(header Header) {
	if hp, ok := header["Pragma"]; ok && len(hp) > 0 && hp[0] == "no-cache" {
		if _, presentcc := header["Cache-Control"]; !presentcc {
			header["Cache-Control"] = []string{"no-cache"}
		}
	}
}

// ProtoAtLeast reports whether the HTTP protocol used
// in the response is at least major.minor.
func (r *Response) ProtoAtLeast(major, minor int) bool {
	return r.ProtoMajor > major ||
		r.ProtoMajor == major && r.ProtoMinor >= minor
}

// Write writes r to w in the HTTP/1.x server response format,
// including the status line, headers, body, and optional trailer.
//
// This method consults the following fields of the response r:
//
//  StatusCode
//  ProtoMajor
//  ProtoMinor
//  Request.Method
//  TransferEncoding
//  Trailer
//  Body
//  ContentLength
//  Header, values for non-canonical keys will have unpredictable behavior
//
// The Response Body is closed after it is sent.
func (r *Response) Write(w io.Writer) error {
	// Status line
	text := r.Status
	if text == "" {
		var ok bool
		text, ok = statusText[r.StatusCode]
		if !ok {
			text = "status code " + strconv.Itoa(r.StatusCode)
		}
	} else {
		// Just to reduce stutter, if user set r.Status to "200 OK" and StatusCode to 200.
		// Not important.
		text = strings.TrimPrefix(text, strconv.Itoa(r.StatusCode)+" ")
	}

	if _, err := fmt.Fprintf(w, "HTTP/%d.%d %03d %s\r\n", r.ProtoMajor, r.ProtoMinor, r.StatusCode, text); err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// Clone it, so we can modify r1 as needed.
	r1 := new(Response)
	*r1 = *r
	if r1.ContentLength == 0 && r1.Body != nil {
		// Is it actually 0 length? Or just unknown?
		var buf [1]byte
		n, err := r1.Body.Read(buf[:])
		if err != nil && err != io.EOF {
			return err
		}
		if n == 0 {
			// Reset it to a known zero reader, in case underlying one
			// is unhappy being read repeatedly.
			r1.Body = NoBody
		} else {
			r1.ContentLength = -1
			r1.Body = struct {
				io.Reader
				io.Closer
			}{
				io.MultiReader(bytes.NewReader(buf[:1]), r.Body),
				r.Body,
			}
		}
	}
	// If we're sending a non-chunked HTTP/1.1 response without a
	// content-length, the only way to do that is the old HTTP/1.0
	// way, by noting the EOF with a connection close, so we need
	// to set Close.
	if r1.ContentLength == -1 && !r1.Close && r1.ProtoAtLeast(1, 1) && !chunked(r1.TransferEncoding) && !r1.Uncompressed {
		r1.Close = true
	}

	// Process Body,ContentLength,Close,Trailer
	tw, err := newTransferWriter(r1)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}
	err = tw.writeHeader(w, nil)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// Rest of header
	err = r.Header.WriteSubset(w, respExcludeHeader)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// contentLengthAlreadySent may have been already sent for
	// POST/PUT requests, even if zero length. See Issue 8180.
	contentLengthAlreadySent := tw.shouldSendContentLength()
	if r1.ContentLength == 0 && !chunked(r1.TransferEncoding) && !contentLengthAlreadySent && bodyAllowedForStatus(r.StatusCode) {
		if _, err := io.WriteString(w, "Content-Length: 0\r\n"); err != nil {
			return err
		}
	}

	// End-of-header
	if _, err := io.WriteString(w, "\r\n"); err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// Write body and trailer
	err = tw.writeBody(w)
	if err != nil {
		return err
	}

	// Success
	return nil
}

func (r *Response) closeBody() {
	if r.Body != nil {
		r.Body.Close()
	}
}

// bodyIsWritable reports whether the Body supports writing. The
// Transport returns Writable bodies for 101 Switching Protocols
// responses.
// The Transport uses this method to determine whether a persistent
// connection is done being managed from its perspective. Once we
// return a writable response body to a user, the net/http package is
// done managing that connection.
func (r *Response) bodyIsWritable() bool {
	_, ok := r.Body.(io.Writer)
	return ok
}

// isProtocolSwitch reports whether r is a response to a successful
// protocol upgrade.
func (r *Response) isProtocolSwitch() bool {
	return r.StatusCode == StatusSwitchingProtocols &&
		r.Header.Get("Upgrade") != "" &&
		httpguts.HeaderValuesContainsToken(r.Header["Connection"], "Upgrade")
}