You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
An aircraft is driven by several turbojet engines each housed in a nacelle. The nacelle has generally a tubular structure comprising an air inlet upstream of the turbojet engine, a middle section intended to surround a fan of the turbojet engine, a downstream section accommodating the thrust reverser means and intended to surround the combustion chamber of the turbojet engine and, usually ended by an ejection nozzle situated downstream of the turbojet engine.
This nacelle is intended to accommodate a double flow turbojet engine capable of generating through the blades of the rotating fan a hot air flow, coming from the combustion chamber of the turbojet engine, and a cold air flow which circulates outside the turbojet engine through an annular channel which is called bypass flow duct.
The thrust reverser device is, during the landing of the aircraft, intended to improve the braking ability thereof by redirecting forward at least a part of the thrust generated by the turbojet engine.
The structure of a thrust reverser comprises a reverser cowl displaceable between, on the one hand, a deployed position in which it opens a passage within the nacelle intended for the diverted air flow, and on the other hand, a retracted position in which it closes this passage.
At least two types of reverser cowl are known from the prior art.
The one-piece cowl, of an almost annular shape, is known, extending from one side to another of the pylon without interruption, and often referred to as “O-duct”, in allusion to the shell shape of such a cowl, as opposed to the “D-duct”, which in fact comprises two half-cowls each extending over half the circumference of the nacelle.
In a case like the other, it is the decline of the cowl by sliding along the rails integral with the pylon which allows to release the thrust reverser cascades, and thus to implement the thrust reverser function.
It is of course crucial that such sliding movement cannot occur in an unexpected manner: such opening would indeed be fatal in flight phase.
For these reasons, safety locks are provided at different locations of the thrust reverser to block the unwanted opening of the cowl.
In a “D-duct” thrust reverser, three safety locks for each half cowl are conventionally provided: two locks called primary directly acting on the two actuating cylinders of each half cowl, and a third lock called tertiary interposed between the beam said “6 hours” (that is to say disposed in the lower portion of the nacelle and on which the two half cowls are slidably mounted) and the half cowl concerned.
Independent power sources are provided for these locks so as to increase the reliability of the safety device.
The remote location of the third lock with respect to the two others also offers a gain of safety vis-à-vis a “duct burst” (explosion of a duct) or of a vane loss: in such a case, only one or two lock(s) could possibly be destroyed, but not all of them.
In an “O-duct” thrust reverser, there is by definition no 6 hours beam: So the implementation of a third lock as in a “D-duct” thrust reverser is not possible.
From the prior art, the French patent delivered and published under the number FR 2 952 908 is known, owned by the applicant, in which the protected present disclosure relates to means for locking the sliding of the thrust reverser “O-duct” cowl interposed between the pylon and said cowl.
FIGS. 1 and 2 illustrate such locking means according to the prior art.
An aircraft turbojet engine assembly comprises a pylon 1 to which a nacelle 3 is suspended, typically comprising an upstream fixed cowl 5 and a downstream movable cowl 7, the upstream and the downstream being understood with respect to the air flow flowing through the nacelle.
In the operating position of the nacelle, that is to say out of the maintenance operations on the turbojet engine, the downstream cowl 7 is slidably mounted between the position shown in FIG. 1, called “direct jet” position, and a position (not shown) slid towards the downstream of the nacelle, allowing to perform a thrust reverser function by rejection of a portion of the air passing through the nacelle upstream thereof.
The thrust reverser shown in FIG. 1 is of the “O-duct” type, that is to say the sliding cowl 7 forms a substantially annular one-piece part extending without discontinuity from a side 9a of the pylon 1 to the opposite side 9b of this pylon.
FIG. 2 relates to the area II of FIG. 1, the sliding cowl 7 having been removed for a better visibility.
The pylon 1 and, on the side 9a of this pylon, a short rail 11 and a long rail 13 can be seen.
The inner structure 15 surrounding the turbojet engine, defining bypass flow duct can also be seen.
The short rail 11 allows the sliding of the cascade vanes 17 of the air flow between a service position shown in FIG. 2, and a maintenance position wherein these cascades are slid to the rear end of the short rail 11, so as to allow the access to the turbojet engine.
The long rail 13 and its counterpart disposed in the other side of the pylon 1 allow the sliding of the cowl 7 between an operating position, comprising a direct jet position and a thrust reverser position in which it releases the cascade vanes 17, allowing the orientation of a portion of the air flow circulating in the bypass flow duct to the front of the nacelle, and a maintenance position (not shown).
A locking device 19 is mounted inside the pylon 1. This device allows providing the maintaining of the cowl in a closed position, that is to say corresponding to an operation of the nacelle in direct jet mode. A hatch 21 formed on the side 9a of the pylon 1 allows to have access to the locking device.
The locking device is, according to the state of the art, and as illustrated in FIGS. 1 and 2, enclosed inside a hatch made in the wall of the pylon to which the nacelle and turbojet engine are fastened.
Such an arrangement has several drawbacks.
First of all, the form of a hatch in the pylon requires to locally cut a portion of the flank of the pylon, which affects the structural strength of said pylon.
Then, during maintenance operations on the turbojet engine, the locking device must be inhibited in order to be able to have access to the turbojet engine. It is therefore obligatory to dismount this hatch for each maintenance operation, which greatly increases the time of access to the engine.
Thus, there is a need for disposing a tertiary lock for a one-piece cowl of thrust reverser, the inhibition of which can be manually accomplished by an operator from the outside the cowl, on the one hand without having to dismount any hatch, and on the other hand without affecting the structural strength of the pylon.