System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
Make a list of common phrases for the given section of the paper.
Input: Introduction

[Ground truth Answer]
1- ... is an important component of ...
2- Central to the discipline of ... is ...
3- Recent developments in ... have shown the need for ...
4- The study build on ... and contributes to ...
5- Until now, has only been applied to ...

[Assistant's Response]
Certainly! Here is a list of common phrases that are often used in the introduction section of academic papers:

1. "The purpose of this study is to..."
2. "This paper aims to..."
3. "In recent years, there has been growing interest in..."
4. "This research addresses the question of..."
5. "The motivation behind this study is..."
6. "To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to..."
7. "Previous studies have shown that..."
8. "This study builds upon..."
9. "The objective of this paper is to..."
10. "This paper is organized as follows..."
11. "A key challenge in this area is..."
12. "This research seeks to explore..."
13. "We hypothesize that..."
14. "This study contributes to the field by..."
15. "The significance of this research lies in..."
16. "This introduction provides an overview of..."
17. "The main findings of this study are..."
18. "This work is motivated by..."
19. "In this paper, we propose..."
20. "The study is structured to address..."

These phrases can help in structuring the introduction and clearly communicating the scope, purpose, and significance of the research.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: