Take all these information and reorganize them into a cohesive detailed paragraph. You don't need to change the wording or anything, just keep all information but remove any repetitive ones: Warner Music has been AGGRESSIVE in trying to become a top dog in the Korean music market. They're not talked about as much as Kakao or HYBE, but they are definitely being bullish in trying to take over the market.

So Warner Music tried to poach the previous members and to do that, they'd need a valid "enough " reason to break the contract but they didn't have any so they lied and relied on public fury (it's no secret that a lot of companies abuse their idols so it wouldn't take much to sway the public). The lie backfired and it came out that their previous company did NOT abuse them and the girls and external parties lied and they're about to enter the find out stages of FA&FO. Did I get that right about this situation? I just really want to understand



Warner Music really said “if you won’t accept our buyout offer we’ll take them anyway.” Because I know they tried buying the company out and Attrakt turned the offer down. I hope Attrakt wins their lawsuit because it’s about time a megacorp is held legally accountable for stealing other people’s stuff. This happens all the time, especially in the tech industry, so if we can at least recognize it in the music industry even once I feel like that’s an improvement.

Attrakt have finally obtained comprehensive legal evidence proving that Warner Music Korea, The Givers, and former Fifty Fifty members colluded to breach their exclusive contracts and engaged in tampering activities. The ex-members' parents had multiple secret meetings, Warner Music even offered them legal help.

The recordings included disparaging comments about ATTRAKT’s CEO Jeon Hong Joon, as well as unsubstantiated claims, such as assertions that HYBE and Min Hee Jin had made offers to Ahn Sung Il to manage their new group (both HYBE and Min Hee Jin have denied these claims, with Min Hee Jin stating she does not even know Ahn Sung Il).”


If small agencies like ATTRAKT keeps getting their artists ripped away from them by outsider companies whenever the smaller agencies find some kind of miraculous success, who is going to create new small agencies for kpop artists? It would just be all big agencies releasing music in the end.



I hope their comeback is successful and their law suits are successful too.
Remember most idols are trying to start a career in these small companies.
And if small companies can just get railroaded and abused like they tried to do with Attrakt then small companies will be that much more hesitant to commit and invest into their groups.
And that's just bad for diversity in the market and all the ppl signing up with a smaller company

Keena really did make the right choice in the end. Some people don’t like that she went back, but ultimately she made a decision that both saved her career and extended it greatly.



.On the broader scope of things, it just goes to show how fans tend to always side w/ the artist over the label. idk how many times I've read about artists being mistreated. There's a couple of groups I'm a fan of where I'd say that fans wanted "mistreatment" to be part of their narrative.

One of the golden rules of K-Pop is that if the group succeeds, it's bc of the members and the members alone and not bc of the song writers, producers, choreographers, etc. If they underperform (even relative to big groups), it's bc their label mismanaged them. If fans see too much content (the idol world is exhausting- the bare minimum is already too much), the idols are overworked and the company treats them like money making machines. If fans don't have enough content from their groups, it's bc the group is not promoted enough.