System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Provide a list of the skills that may help you find the job.
Input: Crew Members

[Ground truth Answer]
Baking
Basic math
Bilingual
Cash handling
Cashiering
Communication skills
Computer literacy
Computer skills
Construction
Cooking
Customer service

[Assistant's Response]
For crew members seeking employment, particularly in industries such as food service, hospitality, or retail, the following skills can significantly enhance their employability and effectiveness:

1. **Customer Service Skills**: The ability to interact positively with customers and address their needs is crucial for providing excellent service and ensuring customer satisfaction.

2. **Teamwork**: Collaborating effectively with coworkers to ensure smooth and efficient operations is vital in a team-oriented environment.

3. **Communication Skills**: Clear verbal and written communication is essential for interacting with both customers and team members, ensuring that information is conveyed accurately.

4. **Time Management**: The ability to prioritize tasks and manage time efficiently is important in fast-paced settings where multiple responsibilities must be handled concurrently.

5. **Problem-Solving**: Quick thinking and the ability to resolve issues that may arise during shifts help maintain a seamless workflow.

6. **Adaptability**: Flexibility to handle changing situations and tasks as needed is valuable in dynamic work environments.

7. **Attention to Detail**: Ensuring accuracy in orders, cleanliness, and adherence to safety standards is critical for maintaining quality and safety.

8. **Multitasking**: Managing multiple tasks simultaneously without compromising quality is often required in busy settings.

9. **Basic Math Skills**: Handling cash transactions and making change accurately are necessary for roles involving sales and cash handling.

10. **Food Safety Knowledge**: Understanding hygiene and safety standards in food handling is essential for positions in food service.

11. **Physical Stamina**: The ability to stand for long periods and perform physically demanding tasks is often required in these roles.

12. **Sales Skills**: The ability to upsell products and promote specials to customers can enhance sales performance.

13. **Conflict Resolution**: Handling customer complaints and conflicts calmly and effectively helps maintain a positive environment.

14. **Technical Skills**: Familiarity with point-of-sale (POS) systems and other workplace technology is increasingly important.

15. **Dependability**: Being reliable and punctual, and showing commitment to the job, is highly valued by employers.

Developing these skills can improve a crew member's chances of securing a job and succeeding in their role.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: