System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Logical Efficiency: Is the response logically efficient? The logic behind the response should have no redundant step, remaining simple and efficient. For tasks involving coding, the proposed solution should also consider time complexity.
Score 1: The logic behind the response is significantly inefficient and redundant, necessitating a complete reorganization of logic for clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The logic of the response lacks efficiency and conciseness, requiring a substantial reorganization for better optimization.
Score 3: The logic of the response is not efficient enough, necessitating major edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The logic of the response is largely efficient, but it still has some redundant steps. It could be handled from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The logic of the response is optimally efficient, requiring no further optimization.
Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
[Instruction]
Check the code could be asnwer for the query. Please classify it either 'yes' or 'no'.\nQuery: Move cursor to this line in the current buffer .\nCode: def _go_to_line(editor, line):\n    """\n    Move cursor to this line in the current buffer.\n    """\n    b = editor.application.current_buffer\n    b.cursor_position = b.document.translate_row_col_to_index(max(0, int(line) - 1), 0)

[Ground truth Answer]
yes

[Assistant's Response]
The query asks whether the provided code can be classified as an answer to the instruction "Move cursor to this line in the current buffer." 

Upon evaluating the code snippet:

```python
def _go_to_line(editor, line):
    """
    Move cursor to this line in the current buffer.
    """
    b = editor.application.current_buffer
    b.cursor_position = b.document.translate_row_col_to_index(max(0, int(line) - 1), 0)
```

This function is designed to move the cursor to a specified line in the current buffer of an editor application. The function takes two parameters: `editor`, which represents the editor instance, and `line`, which indicates the line number to which the cursor should move. The documentation string clearly states its purpose, and the implementation uses the editor's current buffer to change the cursor's position based on the provided line number.

Given this analysis, the appropriate classification for the code in relation to the query is **'yes'**, as it effectively fulfills the requirement of moving the cursor to a specified line in the current buffer.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: