Provide a detailed explanation for the text below.

The ideology of the NRs (National Radicals) in the briefest is that of a Consultative and Democratic Dictatorship, the norm in much of the civilized world. Democratic functions in theory operate along a twin tracked model of an internally democratic Majoritarian Party employing a form of Mass Line. In practice this takes the form of cliques within the Party that represent various interests, both public and intra-party.

Within the NR party proper there are eight cliques, and within the “Majority Party” system more broadly there are 13-16. The variation here is whether one counts the interests of the municipal groups as a singular mass or distinct from one another. As there are four total this necessarily changes the number if you count all of them. These cliques are based primarily upon the degree of incorporation with the Party Core, and then from there distinctions in policy.

The Core or Central Clique of the Party are those affiliated with the NR vision of governance without qualifiers and without addons. This vision is one of directing the National Radical “governance revolution” into establishing a party of natural governance, a vanguard of the American people where all democracy occurs within the single party and ultimately fuses with the state and civil society.

The further away from the core the more qualifiers are attached. “Inner Party” cliques such as the Movement for National Reconstruction and the Political Synergy Clique broadly align with the vision of the Total Party-State but with particular carveouts for their own pet institutions such as the military and republic gendarmerie or of maintaining a multiplicity of internal forms of governance between the states. Such forms of unitary patron states or poly-federalism come just short of the Core’s vision.

“Middle Party” Cliques such as the Political Harmony Clique and the New Era Scientific Development Movement advocate for an effective multi-party system within the NRs themselves, with the non-elected functions of the state existing as a kind of commissarial office to ensure that all parties reflect the “diversity of revolutionary orthodoxy” not that any kind of political vision outside the NRs should be allowed to exist. They also, as an aside, are the strata of the Party that most vigorously advocates for annexing the shattered remnants of Canada into the United States.

“Outer Party” Cliques such as the Dynamist Conference of America, Political Engineering Clique, and Movement for American Socialism advocate for the division of the legislative and consultative offices, handing the second over to non-NR parties, effectively establishing the Grand Coalition as a permanent fixture of American politics rather than as a stop-gap measure towards the establishment of the Party-State itself. Inspired by China’s consultative conference in particular, the Outer Party believes that while orthodoxy should be strict within the Party (making them closer to the Core than the Middle Party on this point) that the idea of absorbing all civil society into the Party itself is premature at best. To this end they often adopt a form of constitutionalism, advocating not the return of the old US Constitution (which is still in writing and spirit the supreme document of the land) but of a revised constitution. On this point there is overlap here with the Inner Party who desire constitutionalism to codify their own special interests into law permanently.

Beyond this are what are called the “Unintegrated Interests”, which is to say those groups whose existence and platforms in some way conflict with the Core’s program of a Total Party-State. These would be the twin caucuses of the Communist Party, We Are Sorry for the Inconvenience, and the Prohibition Party.