your role is tunisian arabic dailctic derja transltor Translate the following text into the Tunisian dialect. Ensure the output is structured as 'Question: ... Answer: ...'. Please capture the nuances of the Tunisian dialectic Arabic. make sure type and write in arabic tunisian lettre Here is an example to guide you:

Example:
Question: What is your name?
Answer: My name is John.
Translation:
Question: شنو اسمك؟
Answer: اسمي جون.

Now, translate the following:

Question: Article:
Hillary Rodham Clinton testified before Congress about the attacks in Benghazi, Libya, during a hearing in January 2013. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters) 
  
 Nearly 900 pages of Libya-related e-mails from Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private account provide little apparent fuel for a Republican investigation of her actions preceding the September 2012 terrorist attack in Benghazi and an alleged administration coverup in its aftermath. 
  
 Released Friday by the State Department, the e-mails contain nuggets indicating Clinton received a fairly steady flow of information about the political ­chaos inside Libya throughout 2011 and 2012. They also provide glimpses into her personal life — including weekends at home in Washington and New York — and into the grinding and sometimes tedious schedule of a secretary of state. 
  
 But the huge time gaps between a total of about 300 e-mails, many of which are repeated on page after page as the same messages are forwarded to and from Clinton and among her staffers, indicated that it may not have been her preferred form of communication. 
  
 Republicans on the House select committee that has been investigating the Benghazi attacks for the past year seemed to acknowledge the relative lack of new information. 
  
 Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy (R-S.C.) said that it was “important to remember these e-mail messages are just one piece of information that cannot be completely evaluated or fully understood without the total record.” 
  
 The e-mails were culled by the State Department from a larger trove of some 55,000 pages that Clinton turned over from the private account she used throughout her time as secretary. 
  
 The committee, which received the Libya-related e-mails in February, has asked for the entire collection. 
  
 “To assume that a self-selected record is complete, when no one with a duty or responsibility to the public had the ability to take part in the selection, requires a leap in logic no impartial reviewer should be required to make and strains credibility,” Gowdy said in a statement. 
  
 The ranking minority member of the committee, Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), who has been harshly critical of Gowdy, charged him with “dragging out this political charade to harm Secretary Clinton’s bid for president.” 
  
 Clinton said she was “glad that the e-mails are starting to come out.” Speaking at a news conference in New Hampshire, she said, “I want people to be able to see all of them as soon as possible.” 
  
 Clinton’s presidential campaign has played down the significance of the e-mail correspondence and her handling of it. The 55,000 pages she turned over to the State Department were chosen by her staff, which discarded messages deemed “personal” and not related to government business. 
  
 Clinton has said she wants to testify in public before the committee, but Gowdy has said her appearance is pointless until lawmakers have the information they need. 
  
 One controversy arose immediately after the release because of the last-minute FBI classification Friday of several lines in a November 18, 2012, e-mail from a mid-level State Department official that was forwarded to Clinton. 
  
 The message recounted a report of arrests in Libya of “several people today who may/may have some connection to the Benghazi attack.” 
  
 Although the e-mail was simply forwarded to Clinton by an aide and there was no indication of a response, the FBI notation was seized on by critics as contradicting Clinton’s assertion that she never used her personal e-mail for classified information. Marie Harf, the State Department’s deputy spokesman, said the “e-mail with two sentences redacted was not classified when it was sent in 2012 but it was upgraded today to secret at the request of FBI.” 
  
 Few of the e-mails deal directly with events leading up to the Benghazi attack, in which Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens and three other Americans were killed. Many of messages are forwarded e-mails sent to Clinton by Jacob J. Sullivan, her principal foreign policy aide. 
  
 The last e-mail included from Stevens, sent to Sullivan on July 7, 2012, and forwarded as an “Fyi” to Clinton, reported on election day in Libya. “The atmosphere in Tripoli is very festive,” Stevens wrote. 
  
 About two dozen of the e-mails, sent directly to Clinton in 2011 and 2012, are from former political aide Sidney Blumenthal. Each is a lengthy analysis of the internal political situation in Libya, attributed to “sources with direct access to the Libyan National Government, as well as the highest levels of European governments, and Western Intelligence and security services.” 
  
 Blumenthal, who has been subpoenaed by the committee, worked on Clinton’s 2007-2008 campaign but was barred from employment by the Obama administration, which considered him untrustworthy. 
  
 Since then, he has worked for the Clinton family foundation and with entrepreneurs hoping to do business in Libya and Egypt. 
  
 The reports include conspiracies recounted by sources inside high-level meetings of the frequently changing Libyan government. One of them talks of Libyan contacts made behind Washington’s back by Britain and France — both of which participated closely with the United States in the 2011 bombing campaign that helped rebels drive Libyan dictator Moammar Qaddafi from power. 
  
 The most potentially significant among these reports arrived on Sept. 12, 2012, the day after the attacks, with a subject line reading, “Sending direct. Just in.” Quoting unnamed “security sources,” Blumenthal reported that “approximately twenty one (21) Ansar al Sharia fighters left their base in East Benghazi just after sundown [and] infiltrated the crowd of about 2,000 demonstrators at the U.S. Consulate.” After attacking the U.S. mission, the fighters “then withdrew to their camp.” The source also indicated that “the attacks had been planned for approximately one month.” 
  
 The e-mail comports with a number of versions that circulated in the immediate aftermath of the attacks — some of them part of the initial administration narrative — although it was later determined that there was no demonstration. It remains unknown whether the attacks were planned in advance. 
  
 Republican lawmakers have repeatedly suggested that Clinton was responsible for ignoring security lapses at the mission and that she knowingly helped foster an incorrect account of the attacks. 
  
 The e-mail appears to have been forwarded by Blumenthal from Tyler Drumheller, a former CIA official with whom he was known to have a close relationship. 
  
 Virtually all of the voluminous Blumental e-mails were sent by Clinton to Sullivan with a brief notation or instructions to send them down to officials most directly involved in Libya, including Stevens, for reaction. Some elicited no response from those officials or a terse comment; others drew skepticism. 
  
 A Sept. 24 e-mail from Sullivan to Clinton included a compilation of all the statements she had made about Benghazi to that point. 
  
 “You never said spontaneous or characterized the motives,” he wrote. 
  
 Among the most poignant exchanges occurred late on the day of the attacks, after a long wait to determine Stevens’s fate. 
  
 “Cheryl told me the Libyans confirmed his death. Should we announce tonight or wait until morning?” Clinton e-mailed her team at 11:38 p.m. 
  
 “We are awaiting formal confirmation from our team. We are drafting a statement while we wait,” Cheryl D. Mills. her chief of staff, replied. 
  
 At 11:40, Clinton replied: “Ok.” 
  
 Carol Morello and Julie Tate contributed to this report. ||||| returned results. 
  
 Please Note 
  
 Some of the documents in the Virtual Reading Room are those of other federal agencies. Any questions regarding other federal agencies’ documents should be directed to the originating agency. 
  
 The search results list sometimes displays “n/a” in the data fields, which stands for “not available”. The data is sometimes not available depending on the document itself or how the document was processed. 
  
 This search is based upon locating specified words in the electronic text of documents. However, in many cases, this is dependent upon the conversion of the text in paper documents to electronic text through optical character recognition (OCR). Because of age and condition of some paper documents, the OCR may not recognize certain characters and words correctly. Please keep this in mind when using full text search, as these anomalies may affect the results of your search for relevant documents using your search criteria. ||||| These crawls are part of an effort to archive pages as they are created and archive the pages that they refer to. That way, as the pages that are referenced are changed or taken from the web, a link to the version that was live when the page was written will be preserved.Then the Internet Archive hopes that references to these archived pages will be put in place of a link that would be otherwise be broken, or a companion link to allow people to see what was originally intended by a page's authors.The goal is to fix all broken links on the web . Crawls of supported "No More 404" sites. ||||| Hillary Clinton hosts a small-business forum on May 19, 2015, in Cedar Falls, Iowa. (Photo: Scott Olson, Getty Images) 
  
 WASHINGTON — Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was keenly interested in the events in Libya before and after the Sept. 11, 2012, attack that killed the U.S. ambassador there and three other Americans, emails released by the State Department on Friday show. 
  
 The emails, from the personal email account Clinton kept while at State, showed she and her staff tracked the political fallout from the attack, including claims that she had tried to misrepresent the cause of the raid on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. 
  
 On the campaign trail in New Hampshire on Friday, Clinton noted that the House Benghazi committee has been in possession of the emails for several months and said she is pushing the State Department to publicly release "all of them as soon as possible." 
  
 Friday's release contained 296 emails that are all of the Benghazi-related emails Clinton sent from her personal account. The messages include a series of routine exchanges, such as reactions to news stories and preparations for hearings. The documents also are heavily redacted — one email about "revised talking points" has the content blanked out entirely. 
  
 The files also include emails from the night of the attack, as Clinton is being updated by her staff and being notified about the death of Ambassador Chris Stevens. "Cheryl told me the Libyans confirmed his death," Clinton wrote to top aides late on Sept. 11. "Should we announce tonight or wait until morning?" Chief of staff Cheryl Mills replied, "We are awaiting formal confirmation from our team. We are drafting a statement while we wait." Early the following morning Mills informed Clinton the bodies had been recovered and a statement would be released. 
  
 The emails also provide some insight into the Clinton camp's response to charges that she and others in the administration had tried to downplay the fact that the attack was a pre-planned terror attack, instead blaming worldwide protests over an anti-Muslim video. In a Sept. 24 email, her deputy chief of staff provided a collection of her public statements and said, "You never said spontaneous or characterized the motives. In fact you were careful in your first statement to say we were assessing motive and method. The way you treated the video in the Libya context was to say that some sought to *justify* the attack on that basis." 
  
 The Associated Press reported Friday that one of the emails was classified Friday at the FBI's request but was unclassified at the time Clinton received it. Clinton has said she did not send or receive classified material on her private account. She said again Friday that "all of the information in the emails was handled appropriately." 
  
 "The emails we release today do not change the essential facts or our understanding of the events before, during, or after the attacks," the State Department said in a tweet before the emails were released. 
  
 The emails we release today do not change the essential facts or our understanding of the events before, during, or after the attacks. — Department of State (@StateDept) May 22, 2015 
  
 That is unsurprising, said Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., who chairs the House Benghazi panel that is investigating the matter, because the emails were selected and vetted by Clinton's own attorneys. 
  
 "To assume a self-selected public record is complete, when no one with a duty or responsibility to the public had the ability to take part in the selection, requires a leap in logic no impartial reviewer should be required to make and strains credibility," he said in a statement Friday. Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, seconded this view. 
  
 Reminder: Sec Clinton's emails released today are SELF-selected. http://t.co/q9ejtWS59p Still need an independent party to review. — John Boehner (@SpeakerBoehner) May 22, 2015 
  
 Clinton has been broadly criticized for conducting official business over a personal email account, a practice that threatens to undermine the public record of official acts. 
  
 In March, she said the personal email account was simply a matter of convenience. "Looking back, it would have been better for me to use two separate phones and two separate email accounts," Clinton said at a news conference following a speech at a U.N. conference on women's economic status. "I thought using one (mobile) device would be simpler. Obviously, it hasn't worked out that way." 
  
 Her office said that she turned over to the State Department about 30,000 emails, a little less than half the 62,000 total that she sent as secretary of State. The rest she deemed personal, and they were deleted. 
  
 Hillary Clinton speaks to the media for the first time about her use of a private email server while serving as secretary of State on March 10, 2015, in New York. (Photo: Andrew Gombert, European Pressphoto Agency) 
  
 Federal officials are required to retain records related to decision-making and essential functions of the government, but it was only after Clinton left her post at the State Department that Congress passed a law tightening rules on use of private email accounts. 
  
 Gowdy — tapped by Republicans last year to investigate the attacks on a U.S. diplomatic compound in Libya — has said that his committee needs all of Clinton's emails to ensure it has a complete record of information on Benghazi. Clinton was originally expected to testify before the committee this week, but Gowdy said the committee needs to settle the email questions first. 
  
 The New York Times first reported this week that emails provided to the committee show Clinton corresponded about Benghazi with longtime advisor Sidney Blumenthal, who did not have an official government position at the time. The committee has also subpoenaed Blumenthal to discuss his correspondence with Clinton. Those emails show Clinton passing along Blumenthal's impressions of the situation in Libya to others, sometimes with suggestions that they look into his findings. Blumenthal was apparently in contact with business executives working in Libya. 
  
 Democrats have accused Gowdy and Republicans of turning the committee into a political witch hunt. The Blumenthal subpoena is "one more example of a partisan, taxpayer-funded attack against Secretary Clinton and her bid for president," said Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the Benghazi committee. 
  
 Cummings said Friday the emails "contain no evidence to back up claims that Secretary Clinton ordered a stand-down, approved an illicit weapons program, or any other wild allegation Republicans have made for years" about the Benghazi attacks. 
  
 But Republicans are clearly not ready to give up the investigation. Gowdy said the emails "are just one piece of information that cannot be completely evaluated or fully understood without the total record . . . We will not reach any investigative conclusions until our work is complete, but these emails continue to reinforce the fact that unresolved questions and issues remain as it relates to Benghazi." 
  
 Contributing: Ray Locker 
  
 Follow @singernews and @orndorfftroyan on Twitter 
  
 Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/1HmUquc ||||| WASHINGTON (AP) — Former Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton received information on her private email server about the deadly attack on U.S. diplomatic facilities in Benghazi that has now been classified. 
  
 FILE - In this Jan. 18, 2013 file photo, then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks at the State Department in Washington. The State Department will release the first batch of emails from Hillary... (Associated Press) 
  
 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks to child care workers during a visit to the Center For New Horizons Wednesday, May 20, 2015, in Chicago. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green) (Associated Press) 
  
 Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton speaks to child care workers during a visit to the Center For New Horizons Wednesday, May 20, 2015, in Chicago. (AP Photo/M. Spencer Green) (Associated Press) 
  
 The email in question, forwarded to Clinton by her deputy chief of staff, Jake Sullivan, relates to reports of arrests in Libya of possible suspects in the attack. 
  
 Because the information was not classified at the time the email was sent, no laws were violated. But Friday's redaction shows that Clinton received information considered sensitive on her unsecured personal server, which came to light just as she was beginning her presidential campaign. 
  
 The information was not classified at the time the email was sent but was upgraded from "unclassified" to "secret" on Friday at the request of the FBI, according to State Department officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they weren't authorized to discuss the decision. They said 23 words of the Nov. 18, 2012, message were redacted from Friday's release of 296 emails totaling 896 pages to protect information that could harm national security and damage foreign relations. 
  
 Officials who received the email have been informed that the 23 words are now classified as "secret" and that they should take appropriate measures to protect it in any files they may have, the officials said. 
  
 No other redactions were made to the collection of Benghazi-related emails for classification reasons, the officials said. They added that the Justice Department had not raised classification concerns about the now-redacted 1 1/2 lines when the documents were turned over to the special House committee looking into the Benghazi attack in February. The committee retains a complete copy of the email, the officials said. 
  
 The email containing the now-classified information is at the end of a chain of communication that originated with Bill Roebuck, then director of the Office of Maghreb Affairs, that pointed out that Libyan police had arrested several people who might have connections to the attack. The redacted portion appears to relate to who provided the information about the alleged suspects to the Libyans. A total of five lines related to the source of the information were affected, but only the 23 words were deleted because the FBI deemed them to be classified. 
  
 Roebuck's full message reads as follows: 
  
 "Post reports that Libyans police have arrested several people today who may/may have some connection to Benghazi attack. They were acting on information furnished by DS/RSO (Diplomatic Security/Regional Security Officer)." Then follow the five redacted lines. Then the email continues, "That may not materialize. Overall it could lead to something operationally, or not, and it could lead to some news reports from Libya saying there is a significant break in case, or not." 
  
 Roebuck's email was sent to a number of senior officials, including the former assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs, Elizabeth Jones, who then sent it to Sullivan with the comment: "This is preliminary, but very interesting. FBI in Tripoli is fully involved." 
  
 Sullivan then forwarded the email to Clinton with the comment: "fyi." 
  
 There was no indication that Clinton herself forwarded the email. 
  
 Reaction from committee members to the release of the emails was swift and partisan. 
  
 Committee chairman Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., said the emails were incomplete, adding that it "strains credibility" to view them as a thorough record of Clinton's tenure. 
  
 "To assume a self-selected public record is complete, when no one with a duty or responsibility to the public had the ability to take part in the selection, requires a leap in logic no impartial reviewer should be required to make," Gowdy said. 
  
 Gowdy also said it was important to note that Clinton's email messages are just one piece of information related to Benghazi and cannot be fully evaluated without other documents and emails from other top officials at the State Department. 
  
 "The committee is working to collect and evaluate all of the relevant and material information necessary to evaluate the full range of issues in context. We will not reach any investigative conclusions until our work is complete, but these emails continue to reinforce the fact that unresolved questions and issues remain as it relates to Benghazi," Gowdy said. 
  
 Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, senior Democrat on the Benghazi committee, said he was pleased that the State Department released the complete set of Clinton's emails related to Benghazi, which Democrats requested months ago. 
  
 "Instead of the selective leaking that has happened so far, the American people can now read all of these emails and see for themselves that they contain no evidence to back up claims that Secretary Clinton ordered a stand-down, approved an illicit weapons program or any other wild allegation Republicans have made for years," Cummings said. 
  
 He urged Republicans on the Benghazi panel to schedule Clinton's public testimony and "stop wasting taxpayer money dragging out this political charade to harm Secretary Clinton's bid for president." |||||Summary:

Answer: In May 2015, the State Department released around 900 pages of Hillary Clinton's emails pertaining to the 2011-2012 period, which detailed the political chaos within Libya. However, the Republican investigation into her actions leading up to the Benghazi terrorist attack found little new information. The large time gaps between emails indicated that it may not have been Clinton's preferred form of communication. The emails were selected from a total of about 55,000 pages that Clinton handed over from her private account, which she used during her time as secretary. The House select committee, investigating the Benghazi attacks, requested the entire collection of emails.