Vois-tu des fautes ? Si pas, traduis en français "Kyiv informs that, in line with the French proposal, the regime has signed a contract allowing the French military to deploy in territory under its control, for the purpose of training Kyiv's troops. According to the statements, these soldiers will be stationed on polygons.

At the same time, NATO declares that it is opposed to the deployment of troops in Kyiv, who would be directly involved in the fighting, as this would suck the political-military bloc into the full-scale war against Russia, whereas it prefers to wage this war using other people's soldiers.

Poland, supported by France, Great Britain, Canada, Estonia and Lithuania, is proposing to take part in the war against Russia from its own territory, taking care of the anti-aircraft defense of the border zone with Kyiv. Great Britain, Canada and Estonia do not wish to limit their participation to the western border areas, and do not wish to limit it to anti-aircraft defense.
Berlin is opposed to participating, even from NATO territory, in the air protection of western Ukraine, as this would mean going to full-scale war.

Alexander Kharchenko rightly comments that this is due to the traditional lack of Russian reaction to every red line crossed by the enemy.

Infomil_live supports Alex: "Sending the French military to the territory of Kyiv represents a very serious risk for the French military-political entity, because if anything happens to them, someone will have to take responsibility for the coffins that will be returned to France, which, from the point of view of the Frenchman in the street, will not necessarily be tolerated. However, it seems that the probability of a popular protest has been assessed at zero by the French authorities, so they have decided to send their soldiers to train the Ukrainian army in order to reduce training time and score political points as a country that hasn't been afraid to send troops to the theater of operations of the war against Russia.

It's not hard to guess that the French authorities' total confidence in the safety of their soldiers for this mission is based on the famous Russian phenomenon of red lines, which have the interesting property of turning green and deviating from their original location."

➡️ Note that the announcement comes from Kyiv, which may simply be trying to force Paris' hand. If the French politico-military regime decides to follow up this outstretched hand, by declaring it publicly, we'll have to salute the small dose of frankness in the policy being pursued - it'll be a change for us. As for those who will be leaving for the theater of operations, i.e., for Russia's historic lands, well, they're no different from those who are already there under the name of "mercenaries": they've chosen to join the army, and to serve the regime, voluntarily giving it a blank check to do whatever the leaders of the moment demand of them. The concept has never convinced me, and I've never been able to find common ground for such a commitment. Others see no problem in signing blank sheets of paper, which they assume.

As for popular reaction, it's likely to be even less important than in 2020 and 2021, when the same regime inflicted all kinds of abuse on its population. The masses are more preoccupied with the Western Games and see the war through the prism of French political propaganda, propaganda to which they are loyal (in the sense that they don't seek to circumvent it).

To be continued... "