please write a 30 word concluding sentence for this paragraph that compares initial assumtion vs now
Before studying the family systems perspective, I perceived it simply as a therapeutic approach that brought family members together to resolve conflicts and improve communication. I thought its primary function was to mediate disputes within the family unit, assisting in managing tensions and facilitating understanding among members. 
Engaging with the unit material has significantly reshaped my understanding. I learned that the family systems perspective views the family as an interconnected system, where each member's behaviour both influences and is influenced by other members. Rather than seeing individual problems in isolation, this approach considers them as manifestations of systemic issues within the family. For example, an adolescent's rebellious behaviours might reflect deeper familial dynamics, such as parental conflict or communication breakdowns, serving a functional role in expressing or diverting underlying tensions.
Bowen’s concept of differentiation of self was interesting. It stresses the importance of individuals being able to balance their emotional and intellectual functioning while maintaining their sense of self within the family system. This concept highlights how low levels of differentiation can lead to enmeshment or excessive emotional reactivity within families, which in turn can perpetuate dysfunctional patterns across generations. Virginia Satir's focus on communication within the family also piqued my interest. Her identification of different communication stances such as blaming, placating, being overly reasonable, or being irrelevant, provides practical insights into how family members may unconsciously adopt certain roles that hinder honest and congruent interactions. Recognising these patterns is a crucial step toward developing healthier communication and relationships within the family system.
One strength of the Family Systems Perspective is its holistic approach. By considering the family as an emotional unit, therapists can address the underlying systemic issues rather than merely treating symptoms presented by an individual. This approach can lead to more sustainable and meaningful changes, as alterations in family dynamics can positively impact all members. However, I also recognise some limitations of this approach. One potential shortcoming is the risk of placing too much emphasis on the family system at the expense of individual agency. By focusing on systemic factors, there might be a tendency to overlook personal responsibility or the unique experiences of each family member. While it's important to consider familial influences, it's equally crucial to acknowledge personal agency and internal psychological processes that may contribute to an individual's issues. 
Moreover, the systemic focus can inadvertently pathologise family structures that deviate from Western norms. Many family systems theories are rooted in Western cultural values, which may not align with the diverse familial arrangements and cultural practices found globally. For example, extended family networks play a vital role in many cultures, and loyalty to family may supersede individual desires. Applying Western-based models without cultural adaptation can lead to misunderstandings and ineffective interventions, as they may not honour the values and relational patterns inherent in different cultures.