I need you to read the cases below and the task. You will design a powerpoint for this task. I know you can not design powerpoints, but considering the task below ,I need you tow rite for me the heading of each slide and the speaker notes for each slide. Each speaker note should be around 100 words. Yo uare an expert in this field so make sure you provide arguments. 
Create a PowerPoint presentation based on the following case studies.
Read the case study presented at the end of Chapter 12 (Guido, p. 218) and answer the following questions:

Did the facility have sufficient evidence to suspend the nurse?
How should the testimony of the other nurses in the unit affect the outcome of this case?
What additional questions should the institution address before the court rules in this case?
How would you have ruled in this case?
Read the case study presented at the end of Chapter 13 (Guido, p. 234) which begins, “The patient was seen by the NP in an outpatient clinic for persistent diarrhea,” and answer the following questions:
How should the expert witness for the defense offer testimony that the NP and the consulting physician had met the standards of care for this individual patient?
Did not having a full autopsy impact the outcome of the case either for or against the NP and the clinic?
Would the care of this patient have been positively impacted by a more thorough examination of the patient’s gastrointestinal problems?
How should the court decide on the issue of negligence?
Read Chapters 16 and 17 in Guido (7th ed). Read the case study presented at the end of Chapter 17 (Guido, p. 328-329) beginning with, “A licensed practical nurse…” and answer the following questions found on p. 329:
Did the nurse manager have a responsibility to supervise the care of the patient?
Was the care of this patient appropriately assigned to the LPN by the charge nurse, or could the charge nurse have delegated this patient's care more appropriately?
If the charge nurse assigned the care of the patient to the LPN, did she retain any supervisory responsibility that would result in her liability in this case?
How do the principles associate with delegation and supervision figure into this case?
How would you decide this case?


The following specifications are required for this assignment:
Structure:
Title: 1 slide
Objectives: 1 slide
Chapter 12 case study: at least 4 slides
Chapter 13 case study: at least 4 slides
Chapter 17 case study: at least 4 slides
Conclusion: 1 slide
References: 1 slide
Additionally, because a good presentation has few words on the slides include a script with the verbiage you would say when presenting; script should be a minimum of 50 words per slide.

Case study presented at the end of Chapter 12 (Guido, p. 218)
You be the Judge.
A nurse had been working in a critical care unit for more than 25 years, gaining respect for her competence and dedication, before suspicions began to gather that she was diverting narcotics for her own use. The acute care hospital used a computerized medicine dispensary for enhanced distribution and better monitoring of narcotics. The dispensary unit recorded the nurse’s personal keypad code and the patient’s data before it could be unlocked and narcotics dispensed. Though the hospital was slowly moving to an all-electronic charting system, at present the nurses were also required to document the narcotic usage by handwriting the patient’s name, medication, time, route, and dosage on a more traditional paper medication administration record (MAR).
Discrepancies were noted between this nurse’s patients’ electronic data for narcotic administration and the handwritten notations made on the paper record. The nurse was first questioned by her supervisors and then she was suspended, as they did not find her explanations credible. Her grievance was upheld by the arbitrator assigned to the case, and the hospital appealed.
At trial, other nurses from the same unit testified that they frequently completed their paper record documentation during their breaks or at the end of the shift, often when they could not remember exactly what medications or dosages they had administered to patients. There was additional information that the nurses would electronically sign for narcotics, prepare.


Chapter 13 (Guido, p. 234) which begins, “The patient was seen by the NP in an outpatient clinic for persistent diarrhea,”
You be the judge.
The patient was seen by the NP in an outpatient clinic for persistent diarrhea, which the patient had been experiencing for a two-week period. The NP, after consulting with the clinic physician, started the patient on Flagyl, an antibacterial medication. Nine days later, the patient phoned the clinic, stating that the medication was making him feel worse, not better. He was instructed to continue with the medication. He collapsed at home the next day and was taken by ambulance to the emergency center where he died. The death certificate pointed to a cardiovascular event with hypertension as a contributing factor; no autopsy was performed.
The patient’s family sued the NP and the clinic for negligence. At the trial level, the medical expert for the family testified that the NP should have ordered a complete metabolic panel, sent a stool sample for analysis, scheduled a follow-up visit within 48 hours, and taken into consideration that Flagyl can enhance diarrhea.

Chapter 17 (Guido, p. 328-329) beginning with, “A licensed practical nurse…”
You be the Judge
A licensed practical nurse (LPN) who worked for a nursing personnel agency worked one evening shift at the Veterans Administration Hospital in a major city. She cared for a patient who had recently undergone hip replacement surgery. Since his surgery, the patient had consistently spiked significant temperatures, but his temperature generally responded well to oral Tylenol, 500 mg, tabs ii, every four hours as needed. The change nurse explained to the LPN that the patient was to continue on every-four-hour vital signs, including temperatures, and that he was to be medicated if his fever increased, even if only at low-grade levels.
During the evening that she worked, the LPN obtained the patient’s temperature at 4 P.M. and again at 8 P.M. He had a low-grade fever at the 4 P.M. hour, and his temperature had risen to 102 degrees orally at 8 P.M. At both intervals, the LPN administered Tylenol as ordered. The charge nurse did not assess the patient during the evening, nor did she inquire about the patient’s condition. The nurse caring for the patient at midnight noted that his temperature was still elevated (102.4°F orally). When notified, the attending physician ordered blood cultures, additional treatment for his ever-increasing fever, and a change in antibiotic therapy.
Despite this aggressive therapy, the patient developed a fatal septicemia, and the patient’s family sued for wrongful death. At trial, the court determined that the charge nurse had been derelict in her duty to