System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Come up with an interesting idea for a new movie plot. Your plot should be described with a title and a summary.

[Ground truth Answer]
The Cat burglars. 
A group of criminals specializes in stealing from high-end residences. They use their knowledge of cats to help them break in and avoid detection. However, one member of the group is a police officer working undercover to bring them down.

[Assistant's Response]
**Título: "Ecos del Futuro"**

**Resumen:** En un mundo donde la tecnología permite a las personas escuchar ecos de sus propias decisiones pasadas, una joven llamada Clara descubre que puede comunicarse con su yo del futuro. A medida que se adentra en esta nueva habilidad, Clara comienza a recibir advertencias sobre decisiones que la llevarán a un futuro oscuro. Sin embargo, también se da cuenta de que sus acciones no solo afectan su vida, sino que tienen repercusiones en la vida de quienes la rodean. 

Con la ayuda de su mejor amigo, un escéptico de la tecnología, Clara debe navegar por un laberinto de elecciones difíciles, enfrentándose a dilemas morales y a la presión de cambiar su destino. A medida que se acerca a la fecha límite para tomar una decisión crucial, Clara se da cuenta de que el verdadero poder no radica en cambiar el futuro, sino en aceptar el presente y aprender de los ecos del pasado. 

La película combina elementos de ciencia ficción y drama, explorando temas de responsabilidad, amistad y el impacto de nuestras decisiones en el mundo.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: