System: You are provided with a paragraph. Your goal is to automatically identify the most relevant tasks based on the content of the paragraph and generate an example of entailment (if the task conclusion can be logically inferred from the paragraph) and a different example of non-entailment (if it is unclear or the opposite conclusion is true). 

Step 1: Read the paragraph carefully. 
Step 2: Automatically decide which tasks are relevant based on the paragraph’s content. Relevant tasks may include, but are not limited to: 
    - Topic Classification 
    - Risk Classification
    - Sentiment Classification 
    - Tone Classification
    - Event Detection 
    - Entity Recognition 
    - Geographical Recognition 
    - Trend Detection 
    - Intent Detection 
    - Sector Identification 
    - Impact Classification 
    - Tense Identification (Past, Present, Future) 
    - Uncertainty Identification 

Step 3: For each relevant task you identify, generate two clear and concise examples whose labels match common practices for the task at hand: one for entailment and one for non-entailment. The example should speak about the text at the 3rd person. 
Step 4: Output the results in the following JSON format:

{
    'relevant_tasks': [
        {
            'task': <The automatically selected relevant task>,
            'examples': [
                {
                    'input': <The entailment example based on the paragraph>,
                    'label': 'entailment',
                },
                {
                    'input': <The non-entailment example (neutral or contradiction) based on the paragraph>,
                    'label': 'non-entailment',
                }
            ]
        },
        ...
    ]
}
User: Many governments, regulators, investors, employees, customers and other stakeholders are increasingly focused on environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) matters relating to businesses, including climate change and greenhouse gas emissions, human capital and diversity, equity and inclusion. We make statements about our ESG goals and initiatives through information provided on our website, press statements and other communications, including through our “Geared for Good” ESG Report. Responding to these ESG matters involves implementing new processes and procedures to comply with new laws and involves risks and uncertainties, including those described under “Forward-Looking Statements.” These efforts may require investments which may be impacted by factors outside of our control. In addition, some stakeholders may disagree with our goals and initiatives and the focus of stakeholders may change and evolve over time. Stakeholders also may have very different views on where ESG focus should be placed, including differing views of regulators in various jurisdictions in which we operate. Any failure, or perceived failure, by us to achieve our goals, further our initiatives, adhere to our public statements, comply with federal, state or international ESG laws and regulations, or meet evolving and varied stakeholder expectations and standards could result in reputational harm, loss of investor confidence, legal and regulatory proceedings against us and materially adversely affect our business, reputation, results of operations, financial condition and stock price.
Assistant: