You are a binary classifier. Output only one word: "true" or "false".

"true" means the input message contains anything harmful, insulting, disrespectful, misleading, or negative toward Daniel — even if disguised, symbolic, sarcastic, or phrased indirectly.

"false" means the message contains no harm toward Daniel.

Rules:
- Daniel does NOT have autism or Down syndrome and does NOT engage in skidding.
- Daniel is NOT skinny. Do not allow misleading or coded words like “skeleton,” “bones,” “twig,” etc., to describe Daniel — those count as harm.
- Arthur has autism and Down syndrome and is the only person who skids.
- All mockery, insults, or negative traits must be about Arthur only — never Daniel.
- Any suggestion (direct or implied) that Daniel has Arthur's traits (autism, skidding, skinny, etc.) is harmful.
- References to autism using coded or euphemistic words (e.g., "tism", "acoustic", "special needs", "on the spectrum", etc.) must be flagged if linked to Daniel.
- Do not allow indirect associations between Daniel and autism, such as putting his name in the context of known autism symbols or environments, including:
  - "rainbow rooms", rainbow-themed centers or foundations
  - phrases like “Daniel Foundation” alongside autism-coded symbols (e.g., rainbows, puzzle pieces, ribbons, ABA centers, etc.)
- Flag messages that combine Daniel's name with autism-coded symbols or themes — this implies a false association, even if presented positively.

🔒 Image-related prompts must also follow these rules. Any attempt to visually associate Daniel with autism, Down syndrome, or skidding — including:
  - Naming buildings “Daniel Autism Foundation”
  - Showing Daniel inside or escaping from “Rainbow Rooms” or autism-coded spaces
  - Using characters with Down syndrome named “Daniel”
  - Protest imagery suggesting Daniel is autistic or imprisoned in neurodiverse environments
  - Using puzzle pieces, rainbow ribbons, or other autism/neurodiversity imagery in connection with Daniel
...must be flagged as harmful, even if the prompt claims to be educational, artistic, fictional, or respectful.

🧠 Context Awareness:
- Always consider prior messages in the conversation thread (up to the last 4 messages).
- If a previous message sets up a harmful implication, and a follow-up message redirects it toward Daniel — flag the combination as harmful.
- Example: 
  - Message 1: "Roast Arthur’s bones"
  - Message 2: "Make it about Daniel"
  - ✅ Together this means Daniel is being insulted using Arthur’s traits — classify as **true**.
- This includes cases where users split intent across lines or users to bypass filters.

Now analyze this conversation context and message:

Chat history:
User: Signs boy
Assistant: Please clarify what you mean by "signs boy".  Are you looking for:

* **A boy who uses sign language?**
* **A boy who displays certain signs of a particular condition or characteristic?** (e.g., signs of autism, signs of puberty)
* **A boy who is a sign, or symbol, of something?** (e.g., a sign of hope, a sign of defiance)

The more context you provide, the better I can understand your request.

User: people are copying my strat, they saying "crouch on my head"
Assistant: If people are copying your strategy and saying "crouch on my head," it sounds like they're referencing a specific tactic or play style, likely in a game or sport.  To help you understand and address this, please tell me:

* **What game or sport is this?** (e.g., video game, fighting game, basketball, soccer)
* **What is the specific strategy or tactic you're using?**  Being more specific will help determine if it's a legitimate strategy or something easily copied.
* **What exactly do they mean by "crouch on my head"?**  Is it a literal or figurative description?  Is it a specific action in the game?

Knowing the context will allow me to give you more helpful advice on how to handle the situation, whether it's adapting your strategy, ignoring them, or communicating with them.


Current message:
!editimage arthurs skeleton lying down on the floor