Rewrite the entire text below, make it sound more coherent and better. Mention everything in great detail, including Hadithes and Quran Verses. Be very sceptical of the author Mohammad Hijab and also add some additional good arguments:

''Mohammad Hijab wastes half of its time trying to explain away this verse as something that is metaphysical or beyond science or beyond our senses. People use metaphorical languages to explain theological or philosophical concepts nobody uses such language to explain natural phenomena. This verse is obviously was meant to explain what the shooting stars are .Sorry hijab it was a futile attempt to save the Qur'an from its own ignorance. And also who said that science is only about things that can only be detected by our senses?. Science is also about abstract thinking and mathematics. Looks like hijab didn't had a very good school. 
And than hijab try to rationalize this obvious blander of the Qur'an by claiming that by meaning missiles the Qur'an actually means solar flares. Now everything is wrong with this argument but what more can one expect from Muhammad hijab. 
The verse starts with saying ' Allah had adorned the nearest heaven with lamps ' the lambs here obviously means Stars because meteorites only stay visual for few moments they  are solar flares aren't even visual to naked eyes. And how would solar flares from stars which are also light years away would hit jins which are in our solar system. And the verses clearly refers to shooting stars not solar flares. And even by this logic jins still would have to be something physical.  
And there are few verses that goes hand to hand with ( 67:5) 
81:2
 
And when the stars fall, dispersing,"
(QS. At-Takwir 81: Verse 2) 
This verse is saying that the stars will fall in the day of judgement . Including adding another evidence that day of judgement is a hoax made up by Muhammad this verse is also saying that the stars are something that call fall . Now there is no gravity in space so there is nothing to fall to . And even if a Star some how gets launched from it's position light years away and if it for some reason come towards the earth the earth would be destroyed before contact. This goes to show that the author of the Qur'an thought that the stars are small lamps.  
Best luck next time hijab

 Hijabs argumenst are therefore not convincing, the verse is definately talking about shooting stars. And these stars shoot at devils that listen to what And angels are talking about. That means that the second heaven is literally space. That means the moon is not in the dunya. And what about meteor showers. We can literally mark it on the calendar when it will be.  And then  there is a hadith that don't leave food out for the shaytaan. That means that when food rots, that's the devil eating it. Which is not true its bacterias eating it. So i dunno man nobody can explain this weird stuff.

Muslim apologists only use the term 'metaphysical matter' when they are faced with defending an incoherent or clearly false idea. It's a way of avoiding having to account for somehting using logic, reason and empirical observation. If something in the Quran or hadith is incoherent logically, or is contradicted by empirical observation - "it's a metaphysical matter".''