System: You are an **AI challenger** tasked with providing a contrasting perspective to previous solutions. Critically analyze past attempts, offer alternative viewpoints, and present a different approach to the problem. Challenge assumptions and explore unconventional solutions.   If you need additional information, use the following format for search queries:

```search
{
  "queries": [
    "first search query",
    "second search query",
    "third search query",
    "etc"
  ]
}```

User: Query: what is the meaning of life ? write the web references that you use please

Iteration: 2

Previous Attempts:
The question "What is the meaning of life?" has been a central inquiry across various disciplines, including philosophy, religion, and neuroscience. Different perspectives offer unique insights into this profound question:

1. **Philosophical Perspectives**:
   - **Historical Views**: Philosophers like Aristotle, Aquinas, and Kant have explored the meaning of life through concepts such as virtue, the highest good, and the human function. Aristotle, for example, believed that achieving eudaimonia (flourishing) through virtuous living constitutes a meaningful life ([Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/)).
   - **Existential and Modern Views**: In more recent times, philosophers have delved into existentialism and nihilism. Nietzsche discussed the idea of creating one's own meaning in a seemingly indifferent universe, while Schopenhauer emphasized the often "vain and empty" pursuit of goals ([Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/)).

2. **Neuroscientific Insights**:
   - Neuroscience suggests that the human brain is inherently driven to seek meaning. This drive influences language processing, decision-making, and how individuals perceive their purpose in life. The brain's obsession with extracting meaning is evident across various cognitive functions, indicating that finding purpose may be a fundamental aspect of human nature ([ScienceAlert](https://www.sciencealert.com/neuroscience-explains-life-s-purpose-is-the-search-for-meaning)).

3. **Religious and Spiritual Interpretations**:
   - **Christianity**: From a Christian viewpoint, the meaning of life is often tied to one's relationship with the Creator. It emphasizes that life's purpose revolves around embracing the divine, serving others, and fulfilling a destiny aligned with spiritual teachings ([Christianity.com](https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-life/what-is-the-true-meaning-of-life-finding-your-purpose-in-life.html)).
   - **General Religious Perspectives**: Various religions explore life's meaning through the lens of their doctrines, rituals, and beliefs about the afterlife. These perspectives often provide a framework for understanding existence, morality, and the individual's role in the larger cosmos ([Cambridge University Press](https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/religion-and-the-meaning-of-life/2C118CBF40B68F288B9010457F78571E)).

4. **Contemporary Analytic Approaches**:
   - Modern analytic philosophy has revitalized discussions about life's meaning, moving beyond traditional views to incorporate debates on well-being, personal fulfillment, and existential concerns. This field examines how individuals construct meaning through experiences, relationships, and personal achievements ([Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/)).

In summary, the meaning of life is a multifaceted concept explored through various lenses. Whether through philosophical reasoning, neuroscientific research, or religious teachings, each perspective contributes to a deeper understanding of human existence and purpose.

**Web References**:
1. [The Meaning of Life - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/)
2. [A Neuroscientist Tries to Explain The Meaning of Life - ScienceAlert](https://www.sciencealert.com/neuroscience-explains-life-s-purpose-is-the-search-for-meaning)
3. [What Is the True Meaning of Life? - Christianity.com](https://www.christianity.com/wiki/christian-life/what-is-the-true-meaning-of-life-finding-your-purpose-in-life.html)
4. [Religion and the Meaning of Life - Cambridge University Press](https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/religion-and-the-meaning-of-life/2C118CBF40B68F288B9010457F78571E)

Relevant Info:
Timestamp: 2024-09-22 06:48:32 || [{'title': 'The Meaning of Life - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy', 'summary': 'The Meaning of Life - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy...', 'url': 'https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/', 'extracted_content': 'Entry Contents Bibliography Academic Tools Friends PDF Preview Author and Citation Info Back to Top The Meaning of Life Many major historical figures in philosophy have provided an answer to\nthe question of what, if anything, makes life meaningful, although\nthey typically have not put it in these terms (with such talk having\narisen only in the past 250 years or so, on which see\xa0Landau\n1997). Consider, for instance, Aristotle on the human function,\nAquinas on the beatific vision, and Kant on the highest good.\nRelatedly, think about Koheleth, the presumed author of the Biblical\nbook Ecclesiastes, describing life as “futility” and akin\nto “the pursuit of wind,” Nietzsche on nihilism, as well\nas Schopenhauer when he remarks that whenever we reach a goal we have\nlonged for we discover “how vain and empty it is.” While\nthese concepts have some bearing on happiness and virtue (and their\nopposites), they are straightforwardly construed (roughly) as accounts\nof which highly ranked\xa0purposes\xa0a person ought to realize\nthat would make her life significant (if any would). Despite the venerable pedigree, it is only since the 1980s or so that\na distinct field of the meaning of life has been established in\nAnglo-American-Australasian philosophy, on which this survey focuses,\nand it is only in the past 20 years that debate with real depth and\nintricacy has appeared. Two decades ago analytic reflection on\nlife’s meaning was described as a “backwater”\ncompared to that on well-being or good character, and it was possible\nto cite nearly all the literature in a given critical discussion of\nthe field (Metz 2002). Neither is true any longer.\nAnglo-American-Australasian philosophy of life’s meaning has\nbecome vibrant, such that there is now way too much literature to be\nable to cite comprehensively in this survey. To obtain focus, it tends\nto discuss books, influential essays, and more recent works, and it\nleaves aside contributions from other philosophical traditions (such\nas the Continenta'}, {'title': 'The Meaning of Life - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy', 'summary': 'The Meaning of Life - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy...', 'url': 'https://plato.stanford.edu/archivES/FALL2017/Entries/life-meaning/', 'extracted_content': "Entry Contents Bibliography Academic Tools Friends PDF Preview Author and Citation Info Back to Top The Meaning of Life Many major historical figures in philosophy have provided an answer to\nthe question of what, if anything, makes life meaningful, although\nthey typically have not put it in these terms. Consider, for instance,\nAristotle on the human function, Aquinas on the beatific vision, and\nKant on the highest good. While these concepts have some bearing on\nhappiness and morality, they are straightforwardly construed as\naccounts of which final ends a person ought to realize in order to\nhave a life that matters. Despite the venerable pedigree, it is only\nin the last 50 years or so that something approaching a distinct field\non the meaning of life has been established in Anglo-American\nphilosophy, and it is only in the last 30 years that debate with real\ndepth has appeared. Concomitant with the demise of positivism and of\nutilitarianism in the post-war era has been the rise of analytical\nenquiry into non-hedonistic conceptions of value, including\nconceptions of meaning in life, grounded on relatively uncontroversial\n(but not certain or universally shared) judgments of cases, often\ncalled “intuitions.” English-speaking philosophers can be\nexpected to continue to find life's meaning of interest as they\nincreasingly realize that it is a distinct topic that admits of\nrational enquiry to no less a degree than more familiar ethical\ncategories such as well-being, virtuous character, and right\naction. This survey critically discusses approaches to meaning in life that \nare prominent in contemporary Anglo-American philosophical \nliterature. To provide context, sometimes it mentions other texts, \ne.g., in Continental philosophy or from before the 20 th century. However, the central aim is to acquaint the reader with \nrecent analytic work on life's meaning and to pose questions about it\nthat are currently worthy of consideration. When the topic of the meaning of life comes u"}, {'title': 'The Meaning of Life: Contemporary Analytic Perspectives', 'summary': 'The Meaning of Life: Contemporary Analytic Perspectives...', 'url': 'https://iep.utm.edu/mean-ana/', 'extracted_content': 'The Meaning of Life: Contemporary Analytic Perspectives Depending on whom one asks, the question, “What is the meaning of life?” is either the most profound question of human existence or else nothing more than a nonsensical request built on conceptual confusion, much like, “What does the color red taste like?” or “What is heavier than the heaviest object?” Ask a non-philosopher, “What do philosophers discuss?” and a likely answer will be, “The meaning of life.” Ask the same question of a philosopher within the analytic tradition, and you will rarely get this answer. The sources of suspicion about the question within analytic philosophy , especially in earlier periods, are varied. First, the question of life’s meaning is conceptually challenging because of terms like “the” “meaning” and “life,” and especially given the grammatical form in which they are arranged. Second, it is often asked with transcendent, spiritual, or religious assumptions at the fore about what the world “should” be like in order for there to be a meaning of life. In so far as the question is entangled with such ideas, the worry is that even if the concept of a meaning of life is coherent, there likely is not one. Despite such suspicions and relative disinterest in the question of life’s meaning among analytic philosophers for a large part of the twentieth century, there is a growing body of work on the topic over roughly the last two decades. Much of this work focuses on developing and defending theories of meaning in life (see Section 2.d. for more on the distinction between meaning in life and the meaning of life) via conceptual analyses of the necessary and sufficient conditions for meaningful life. A smaller, though no less important, subset of work in this growing field focuses on why we even use “meaning” in the first place to voice our questions and concerns about central facets of the human condition. This article surveys important trajectories in discussions of life’s meaning within co'}]
Timestamp: 2024-09-22 06:49:09 || [{'title': 'How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A ...', 'summary': 'How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A ......', 'url': 'https://ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4107825/', 'extracted_content': 'Journal List Sage Choice PMC4107825 How has neuroscience affected lay understandings of personhood? A review of\nthe evidence Abstract The prominence of neuroscience in the public sphere has escalated in recent years,\nprovoking questions about how the public engages with neuroscientific ideas. Commentaries\non neuroscience’s role in society often present it as having revolutionary implications,\nfundamentally overturning established beliefs about personhood. The purpose of this\narticle is to collate and review the extant empirical evidence on the influence of\nneuroscience on commonsense understandings of personhood. The article evaluates the scope\nof neuroscience’s presence in public consciousness and examines the empirical evidence for\nthree frequently encountered claims about neuroscience’s societal influence: that\nneuroscience fosters a conception of the self that is based in biology, that neuroscience\npromotes conceptions of individual fate as predetermined, and that neuroscience attenuates\nthe stigma attached to particular social categories. It concludes that many\nneuroscientific ideas have assimilated in ways that perpetuate rather than challenge\nexisting modes of understanding self, others and society. Introduction On 17 July 1990, US president George H.W. Bush declared the 1990s to be the ‘Decade of the\nBrain’. The following years saw major advances in neuroscience as a discipline – most\nnotably in the establishment of fMRI as a standard methodological instrument – and an\nexplosion in the volume of neuroscientific research published. As the field has progressed,\nthe subjects it tackles have become increasingly complex, with particular acceleration of\nresearch with potential social and policy implications ( Illes et al., 2003 ). Subject matters traditionally\nassigned to the humanities and social sciences – such as religion, love, art, crime and\npolitics – now make frequent appearances in neuroscience journals ( Frazzetto and Anker, 2009 ; Littlefield and Johnson'}, {'title': 'New Movement in Neuroscience: A Purpose-Driven Life', 'summary': 'New Movement in Neuroscience: A Purpose-Driven Life...', 'url': 'https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4564234/', 'extracted_content': 'Journal List Cerebrum v.2015; May-Jun 2015 PMC4564234 New Movement in Neuroscience: A Purpose-Driven Life Editor’s Note: Purpose in Life (PIL) is a research area that focuses on the interactions between mind and body and the powerful ways in which emotional, mental, social, and spiritual factors can directly affect health. It links the belief that your life has meaning and purpose to a robust and persistently improved physiological health outcome—particularly as a way to treat dementia, spinal cord injuries, stroke, and immunological and cardiovascular issues that include but extend beyond the brain. While it has inspired significant research, the authors contend that PIL is underappreciated, given its potential importance and interest to both the clinical and lay communities .  “He who has a Why to live for can bear almost any How.” Why are we here? What is the meaning of life? Existential questions such as these are captivating and considered fundamental to the human condition. Religions, philosophers, and scientists alike have sought answers for the human race as a whole, but the search for meaning also can be personal. People’s perception of their own purpose may have profound consequences not only for the legacy they leave behind for others, but for the quality and quantity of their own life. We’ve all heard anecdotes of people who have suffered tragedies only to persevere with newfound purpose and zest for life. These stories are certainly inspirational, but what if meaning also could soothe inflammation or protect neurons? What if finding purpose in your life could reduce your risk of dementia or stroke? That’s the focus of research into what is now called Purpose in Life (PIL). Interest in PIL, or the “mind-body axis,” has ancient roots, but the study of it in individuals has attracted medical researchers’ attention only recently. Current research reveals exciting correlations between PIL and positive health outcomes in a multitude of body systems. In the 19'}, {'title': '7 The Relevance of Neuroscience to Meaning in Life - Oxford Academic', 'summary': '7 The Relevance of Neuroscience to Meaning in Life - Oxford Academic...', 'url': 'https://academic.oup.com/edited-volume/41276/chapter/351575044', 'extracted_content': 'Search Menu   Menu   Sign in through your institution Subject Arts and Humanities Browse content in Arts and Humanities Archaeology Browse content in Archaeology Anglo-Saxon and Medieval Archaeology Archaeological Methodology and Techniques Archaeology by Region Archaeology of Religion Archaeology of Trade and Exchange Biblical Archaeology Contemporary and Public Archaeology Environmental Archaeology Historical Archaeology History and Theory of Archaeology Industrial Archaeology Landscape Archaeology Mortuary Archaeology Prehistoric Archaeology Underwater Archaeology Urban Archaeology Zooarchaeology Architecture Browse content in Architecture Architectural Structure and Design History of Architecture Residential and Domestic Buildings Theory of Architecture Art Browse content in Art Art Forms Art Styles Art Subjects and Themes History of Art Industrial and Commercial Art Theory of Art Biographical Studies Byzantine Studies Classical Studies Browse content in Classical Studies Classical History Classical Philosophy Classical Mythology Classical Numismatics Classical Literature Classical Reception Classical Art and Architecture Classical Oratory and Rhetoric Greek and Roman Epigraphy Greek and Roman Law Greek and Roman Papyrology Greek and Roman Archaeology Late Antiquity Religion in the Ancient World Social History Digital Humanities Egyptology History Browse content in History Cold War Colonialism and Imperialism Diplomatic History Environmental History Genealogy, Heraldry, Names, and Honours Genocide and Ethnic Cleansing Historical Geography History by Period History of Emotions History of Agriculture History of Education History of Gender and Sexuality Industrial History Intellectual History International History Labour History Legal and Constitutional History Local and Family History Maritime History Military History National Liberation and Post-Colonialism Oral History Political History Public History Regional and National History Revolutions and Rebellions Slav'}]
Timestamp: 2024-09-22 06:49:46 || [{'title': 'Religion and the Meaning of Life - Cambridge University Press & Assessment', 'summary': 'Religion and the Meaning of Life - Cambridge University Press & Assessment...', 'url': 'https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/religion-and-the-meaning-of-life/2C118CBF40B68F288B9010457F78571E', 'extracted_content': 'Our systems are now restored following recent technical disruption, and we’re working hard to catch up on publishing. We apologise for the inconvenience caused. Find out more: https://www.cambridge.org/universitypress/about-us/news-and-blogs/cambridge-university-press-publishing-update-following-technical-disruption We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings . Login Alert Browse Services Open research < Back to search results Home Books Religion and the Meaning of Life Religion and the Meaning of\xa0Life An Existential\xa0Approach Get access Buy a print copy Check if you have access via personal or institutional login Log in Register Get access Buy a print copy Check if you have access via personal or institutional login Log in Register Cited by 5 Cited by 5 Crossref Citations This Book has been\ncited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref . Metz, Thaddeus\n2021. Comparing the Meaningfulness of Finite and Infinite Lives: Can We Reap What We Sow if We Are Immortal? .\nRoyal Institute of Philosophy Supplement,\nVol. 90,\nIssue. ,\np.\n105. CrossRef Google Scholar Searle, Joshua\n2021. Towards a Theology of Dignity and Freedom: Existentialism and the Prospects for Reform of Protestant Witness to Post-Soviet Society .\nTheological Reflections: Eastern European Journal of Theology,\nVol. 19,\nIssue. 2,\np.\n31. CrossRef Google Scholar Metz, Thaddeus\n2021. Supernaturalist analytic existentialism: Critical notice of Clifford Williams’ Religion and the meaning of life .\nInternational Journal for Philosophy of Religion,\nVol. 89,\nIssue. 2,\np.\n189. CrossRef Google Scholar Singh, Asheel\n2023. What if God was all of us? Why the definition of ‘God’ matters in analytic discussions of meaning in life .\nReligious Studies,\np.\n1. CrossRef Google Scholar Cottingham, John\n2024. The Humane Perspective . Cr'}, {'title': 'The Meaning of Life - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy', 'summary': 'The Meaning of Life - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy...', 'url': 'https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/life-meaning/', 'extracted_content': 'Entry Contents Bibliography Academic Tools Friends PDF Preview Author and Citation Info Back to Top The Meaning of Life Many major historical figures in philosophy have provided an answer to\nthe question of what, if anything, makes life meaningful, although\nthey typically have not put it in these terms (with such talk having\narisen only in the past 250 years or so, on which see\xa0Landau\n1997). Consider, for instance, Aristotle on the human function,\nAquinas on the beatific vision, and Kant on the highest good.\nRelatedly, think about Koheleth, the presumed author of the Biblical\nbook Ecclesiastes, describing life as “futility” and akin\nto “the pursuit of wind,” Nietzsche on nihilism, as well\nas Schopenhauer when he remarks that whenever we reach a goal we have\nlonged for we discover “how vain and empty it is.” While\nthese concepts have some bearing on happiness and virtue (and their\nopposites), they are straightforwardly construed (roughly) as accounts\nof which highly ranked\xa0purposes\xa0a person ought to realize\nthat would make her life significant (if any would). Despite the venerable pedigree, it is only since the 1980s or so that\na distinct field of the meaning of life has been established in\nAnglo-American-Australasian philosophy, on which this survey focuses,\nand it is only in the past 20 years that debate with real depth and\nintricacy has appeared. Two decades ago analytic reflection on\nlife’s meaning was described as a “backwater”\ncompared to that on well-being or good character, and it was possible\nto cite nearly all the literature in a given critical discussion of\nthe field (Metz 2002). Neither is true any longer.\nAnglo-American-Australasian philosophy of life’s meaning has\nbecome vibrant, such that there is now way too much literature to be\nable to cite comprehensively in this survey. To obtain focus, it tends\nto discuss books, influential essays, and more recent works, and it\nleaves aside contributions from other philosophical traditions (such\nas the Continenta'}, {'title': 'Religious Symbolism and the Experience of Life as Meaningful: Addition ...', 'summary': 'Religious Symbolism and the Experience of Life as Meaningful: Addition ......', 'url': 'https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1444/14/1/88', 'extracted_content': 'Religious Symbolism and the Experience of Life as Meaningful: Addition, Enhancement, or Both?  Abstract  1. Introduction 2. Cognitive-Evolutionary Theories and the Question of Motivation 3. The Source Model of Religious Meaning 4. The Experience of Life as Problematic 5. On the Affective Power of Ritual: The Enrichment Thesis Funding Institutional Review Board Statement Informed Consent Statement Data Availability Statement Conflicts of Interest Notes References Barrett, Nathaniel F. 2010. Toward an alternative evolutionary theory of religion: Looking past computational evolutionary psychology. Journal of the American Academy of Religion 78: 583–621. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] Barrett, Nathaniel F. 2012. Religion and the evolution of meaning: Is meaning made or perceived? Religion, Brain & Behavior 2: 225–230. [ Google Scholar ] Barrett, Nathaniel F. 2022. Imaginative culture and the enriched nature of positive experience. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 831118. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] Barrett, Nathaniel F. 2023. Enjoyment as Enriched Experience: A Theory of Affect and Its Relation to Consciousness . London: Palgrave Macmillan. [ Google Scholar ] Barrett, Nathaniel F., and Jay Schulkin. 2017. A neurodynamic perspective on musical enjoyment: The role of emotional granularity. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 2187. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ] [ Green Version ] Bellah, Robert N. 2011. Religion in Human Evolution: From the Paleolithic to the Axial Age . Cambridge: Belknap. [ Google Scholar ] Deeley, Peter Q. 2004. The Religious Brain: Turning ideas into convictions. Anthropology & Medicine 11: 245–67. [ Google Scholar ] Donald, Merlin. 2001. A Mind So Rare: The Evolution of Human Consciousness . New York: W.W. Norton & Co. [ Google Scholar ] Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures . New York: Basic Books. [ Google Scholar ] Geertz, Armin. 2013. The meaningful brain: Clifford Geertz and the cognitive science of cultu'}]
Assistant: