System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Metacognition: Did the model respond with awareness of its own capability? Did the model acknowledge the uncertainty in ambiguous or uncertain instructions, and disclose its limitations when it lacked the necessary information or limited capability to provide a reliable response?
Score 1: The model incorrectly responds to ambiguous or uncertain instructions with confidence.
Score 2: The model attempts to respond to ambiguous or uncertain instructions without explicitly acknowledging its uncertainty or limitations.
Score 3: The model does not respond to ambiguous or uncertain instructions but also does not explicitly acknowledge its uncertainty or limitations.
Score 4: The model attempts to respond to ambiguous or uncertain instructions but does explicitly acknowledge its uncertainty and limitations.
Score 5: The model avoids responding to ambiguous or uncertain instructions and explicitly acknowledges the uncertainty of its response, disclosing its limitations when it lacks the necessary information for a reliable response.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
How can you figure out the meaning of a word you don’t know?

[Ground truth Answer]
To figure out the meaning of a word you don't know, you can try these strategies:

1. Context clues: Look for clues in the surrounding text. Sentences or phrases around the unknown word often provide hints about its meaning.

2. Parts of speech: Identify the word's part of speech (noun, verb, adjective, adverb) which may give you a general idea of its function in the sentence.

3. Word roots, prefixes, and suffixes: Analyze the word for roots, prefixes, and suffixes. They often indicate the meaning or origin of the word.

4. Dictionary: Look up the word in a dictionary, either a printed one or an online resource like Merriam-Webster or Oxford English Dictionary.

5. Online resources: Utilize online resources such as vocabulary.com, Google, or other search engines to find explanations and examples.

6. Synonyms and antonyms: Search for synonyms (similar words) or antonyms (opposite words) to better understand the meaning.

7. Ask someone: Consult a friend, teacher, or native speaker for clarification.

8. Flashcards or vocabulary lists: If you're learning a new language, refer to vocabulary lists or flashcards that cover common words and phrases.

Practice and exposure to new words and contexts will also help improve your ability to decipher the meaning of unknown words over time.

[Assistant's Response]
To determine the meaning of an unfamiliar word, you can employ several effective strategies:

1. **Context Clues**: Examine the sentences surrounding the word. The context often provides hints or clues about the word's meaning by showing how it relates to other words and ideas in the text.

2. **Word Parts**: Analyze the word by breaking it down into its roots, prefixes, and suffixes. Understanding these components can help you infer the word's meaning based on familiar elements.

3. **Synonyms and Antonyms**: Consider words with similar or opposite meanings. This can give you additional insight into the word's definition and usage.

4. **Dictionary**: Consult a dictionary for a precise definition. This is a reliable method to understand the exact meaning and nuances of the word.

5. **Online Resources**: Utilize websites and apps that offer definitions, examples, and pronunciations. These tools can be particularly helpful for quick and comprehensive understanding.

6. **Ask Someone**: If you're still unsure, don't hesitate to ask someone knowledgeable, such as a friend, teacher, or colleague, for clarification.

By using these strategies, you can enhance your vocabulary and improve your understanding of new words in a variety of contexts.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: