System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
You should inspect the role of each sentence in the given long-form answer for the question. The role is one of 'Organizational sentence', 'Auxiliary Information', 'Answer', 'Example', and 'Miscellaneous'. The Organizational sentence is to inform the reader how the answer will be structured. The Auxiliary Information provides information that are related to what is discussed in the answer, but not asked in the question. The Answer is an answer sentence directly addresses the question. The Example is literally example sentence to give better understanding. The Miscellaneous contains all other sentences.\n\nQuestion: what is the difference between emery board and nail file\n\nLong-form Answer:\n\n Emery boards are generally less abrasive than the metal nail files , and hence , emery boards may take longer to file down nails than metal nail files . However , nail files may play a role in disease transmission if they are used on more than one person without adequate sterilization . Emery boards are usually less expensive than metal nail files , therefore emery boards can be economically disposed of after use on a single person . The nail can be smoothed and shaped accurately by taking light , even strokes in one direction across the top of the nail . Twenty to thirty easy strokes can typically shorten excessively long fingernails , while five to ten strokes are sufficient for shaping the nails .  A nail file is a tool used to gently grind down and shape the edges of nails . They are often used in manicures and pedicures after the nail has been trimmed using appropriate nail clippers . Nail files may either be emery boards , ceramic , glass , crystal , plain metal files or metal files coated with corundum . 

[Ground truth Answer]
Answer, Auxiliary Information, Answer, Auxiliary Information, Auxiliary Information, Answer, Auxiliary Information, Answer

[Assistant's Response]
To analyze the roles of each sentence in the provided long-form answer regarding the differences between emery boards and nail files, we can categorize them as follows:

1. **Organizational Sentence:** 
   - There is no explicit organizational sentence in the provided answer that outlines how the response will be structured. An effective organizational sentence would typically guide the reader on what to expect in the following content.

2. **Answer:**
   - **"Emery boards are generally less abrasive than the metal nail files, and hence, emery boards may take longer to file down nails than metal nail files."** 
   - **"A nail file is a tool used to gently grind down and shape the edges of nails."** 
   These sentences directly address the differences between emery boards and nail files.

3. **Auxiliary Information:**
   - **"However, nail files may play a role in disease transmission if they are used on more than one person without adequate sterilization."** 
   - **"Emery boards are usually less expensive than metal nail files, therefore emery boards can be economically disposed of after use on a single person."** 
   - **"They are often used in manicures and pedicures after the nail has been trimmed using appropriate nail clippers."** 
   - **"Nail files may either be emery boards, ceramic, glass, crystal, plain metal files or metal files coated with corundum."** 
   These sentences provide relevant context and additional information related to the main topic but do not directly answer the question.

4. **Example:**
   - **"The nail can be smoothed and shaped accurately by taking light, even strokes in one direction across the top of the nail."** 
   - **"Twenty to thirty easy strokes can typically shorten excessively long fingernails, while five to ten strokes are sufficient for shaping the nails."** 
   These sentences serve as examples illustrating how to use nail files or emery boards effectively.

5. **Miscellaneous:**
   - There are no sentences that fall under the miscellaneous category, as all provided sentences fit into one of the other defined roles.

In summary, while the answer provides valuable information, it lacks an organizational sentence to guide the reader. The main differences between emery boards and nail files are addressed, supplemented by relevant auxiliary information and practical examples. For a more structured response, it would benefit from an introductory sentence outlining the comparison.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: