User: Page 1 of the Google Doc must include the research objectives which will be graded)
Assistant: When creating a Google Doc for a research project, it's crucial to clearly outline the research objectives on the first page. Here's a structure you can follow to ensure they are well-defined and comprehensive:

---

**Research Objectives**

1. **Objective 1: Define the Problem or Question**
   - Clearly state the problem or question your research aims to address. This should be specific and focused, guiding the direction of your study.

2. **Objective 2: Literature Review Goals**
   - Outline the goals for your literature review, such as identifying gaps in existing research, understanding theoretical frameworks, or determining the current state of knowledge on the topic.

3. **Objective 3: Methodological Approach**
   - Describe the methodological approach you plan to use in your research. This includes the type of research (qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods), data collection methods, and any particular considerations that will influence your approach.

4. **Objective 4: Expected Outcomes or Contributions**
   - Specify what outcomes you expect from your research and how it will contribute to the field. This might include advancing knowledge, informing policy, or providing practical solutions to a problem.

5. **Objective 5: Application of Findings**
   - Explain how the findings of your research will be applied in practice or theory. Discuss who might benefit from your research and how it can be utilized in real-world scenarios.

6. **Objective 6: Limitations and Delimitations**
   - Acknowledge any limitations in your research and the scope you have defined. This helps set realistic expectations about what your research will achieve.

---

Ensure that these objectives are concise and directly related to your overall research goal. You might also consider seeking feedback from peers or advisors to refine the objectives further. This structure not only makes your research intentions clear but also sets a solid foundation for your entire project.
User: ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS:


Page 1 of the Google Doc must include the research objectives which will be graded)
Page 2 of the Google Doc must include the consent form (an additional consent form must be added for those requiring consent from multiple sources)
Page 3 on wards of the Google Doc must include the research instrument.

A sample consent form can be found in your proposal package Google Drive. Final proposals must be accompanied by a corresponding research instrument in the Appendix. Your instrument must match the research design.



PART A: INFORMED CONSENT

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Write the score for PART A below

 

Yes

No

An informed consent form is submitted

 

 

An address to the participant is included

 

 

Introduction of the researcher is included

 

 

The purpose of the study is included

 

 

Provides a time estimate as to how long the questionnaire will take to answer

 

 

Includes an offer to withdraw from the experiment

 

 

Statement of confidentiality is included

 

 

Benefits of the study are included

 

 

Associated risks are clearly described or a statement of no known risks is included

 

 

Contact information is provided

 

 

Reminder of voluntary participation is included

 

 

Clear endorsement of lecturer/research supervisor

 

 

Expression of thanks to the respondent is included

 

 

University letterhead included

 

 

Total Marked Yes:

 

=

 

 

PART B: RESEARCH INSTRUMENT

 

Area of Assessment

Ratings

Score

1

2

3

4

Research Objectives

Research objectives are unrelated to the purpose of the study or not provided.

Research objectives are related to the purpose of the study/research problem but are vague or unclear.

Research objectives are related to the purpose of the study & research problem but require minor modification in wording.

Research objectives are clear and aligned to the purpose of the study & research problem.

 

Appropriateness of questions

Many questions are not valid or complete. Repetition of questions.

A few questions are not valid or incomplete. Some repetition of questions.

One question is not valid or complete. No repetitive questions.

All questions are valid and complete. No repetitive questions.

 

Clarity of

Questions

Questions are confusing or ambiguous.

 

Questions are somewhat clear but a respondent would have to ask for clarification

Questions are clear but the respondent would have to ask for clarification.

Questions are very clear and a respondent would not have to ask for clarification

 

Construction of Questions

Most questions are not aligned to research objectives.

Most questions are aligned with research objectives but are not objective and/or contain assumptions and/or are unfocused.

Most questions are aligned with research objectives are focused but lack some objectivity.

Questions are aligned with research objectives and appropriately constructed. They are focused and objective

 

English usage in Informed Consent & Research Instrument

Numerous spelling errors.  Grammar, punctuation, spacing and word usage have a number of errors.

Most words are spelled correctly.  Grammar, punctuation, spacing and word usage have some errors.

Most words are spelled correctly.  Grammar, punctuation, spacing and word usage are mostly appropriate.

All words are spelled correctly.  Grammar, punctuation, spacing and word usage are appropriate.

 

Creativity and Layout

The instrument and consent form layout does not reflect an attempt to visually engage the respondent.

 

The instrument and consent form layout reflects an attempt to visually appeal to the respondent.

The instrument and consent form layout is obviously visually appealing and engaging to the respondent.

 

Sum of scores for Part A & B:

ÿ       34.5-38 (A-A-) – Exemplary

ÿ       30.5-34 (B-B+) – Competent

ÿ       26.5-30 (C-C+) – Developing

ÿ       23-26 (D-D+) – Poor

ÿ       <22.5 (F) – Failing
Assistant: To prepare your assignment following these instructions, you'll want to ensure that each section of your Google Doc is well-structured and meets the required components. Here's a guide to help you organize your document, which will be assessed on both Part A and Part B criteria:

**Page 1: Research Objectives**

1. **Introduction to Research Objectives:**
   - Provide a brief introduction to your research objectives, highlighting their importance to your study.

2. **List Each Objective Clearly:**
   - Ensure each objective directly relates to the study’s purpose and research problem.
   - Use concise language and ensure they are measurable and achievable.
   - Align objectives with what you aim to explore or find in your study.

3. **Ensure Clarity:**
   - Make sure the language is clear and that the objectives are understandable without further explanation.

**Page 2: Informed Consent Form**

Refer to the sample consent form from your proposal package and ensure it includes the following components as per the checklist:

1. **Address to the Participant:**
   - Begin with a greeting or salutation to personalize the form.

2. **Researcher Introduction:**
   - Include your name and affiliation.

3. **Purpose of the Study:**
   - Clearly state what the study is about.

4. **Time Estimate:**
   - Inform participants how long the questionnaire or study will take.

5. **Voluntary Participation and Withdrawal:**
   - Allow participants the option to not participate or withdraw at any time.

6. **Confidentiality Statement:**
   - Assure participants of the confidentiality of their data.

7. **Study Benefits:**
   - Mention any potential benefits of the research to society or the participant.

8. **Risk Statement:**
   - Clearly describe any risks or state if there are no known risks.

9. **Contact Information:**
   - Provide the researcher’s contact details for questions or concerns.

10. **Voluntary Participation Reminder:**
    - Reinforce the voluntary nature of participation.

11. **Lecturer/Research Supervisor Endorsement:**
    - Include a statement of support from your academic supervisor.

12. **Expression of Thanks:**
    - Thank the participant for considering being part of your study.

13. **University Letterhead:**
    - Ensure your document is on university letterhead if required.

**Page 3 Onwards: Research Instrument**

1. **Introduction to Research Instrument:**
   - Briefly explain what the instrument is and its purpose in your study.

2. **Questionnaire or Test:**
   - List all questions or prompts ensuring each aligns with your research objectives.
   - Keep questions clear and focused, avoiding ambiguous language.
   - Mission repetition unless necessary for reliability checks.

3. **Structure:**
   - Organize questions logically, using sections or categories if needed.

4. **Layout & Presentation:**
   - Make the document visually appealing to engage respondents.
   - Use appropriate spacing, bullet points, or numbering for clarity.

5. **Language:**
   - Check for spelling, grammar, and punctuation errors throughout both parts of the document.

Finally, ensure that all parts of your document are cohesive and reflect a professional and academic tone. Following these guidelines will help you meet the criteria laid out in both Part A and Part B of your assignment instructions.
User: my topic is dark tourism,
Assistant: Great, dark tourism is a fascinating and rich topic. Here's how you can tailor your document to address this subject effectively:

**Page 1: Research Objectives**

1. **Introduction to Research Objectives:**
   - Begin by explaining what dark tourism is, which generally refers to travel to locations associated with death, disaster, or the macabre. Mention how it's an evolving field of study.

2. **List of Research Objectives:**

   - **Objective 1: Exploration of Motivations**
     - Investigate what drives people to engage in dark tourism. Are they seeking thrill, education, or something else?

   - **Objective 2: Impact Assessment**
     - Assess the socio-economic and cultural impacts of dark tourism on local communities.

   - **Objective 3: Ethical Considerations**
     - Explore the ethical implications and controversies surrounding dark tourism sites’ commercialization.

   - **Objective 4: Preservation vs. Exploitation**
     - Investigate how dark tourism sites balance between preserving history and exploiting it for commercial gain.

   - **Objective 5: Psychological Effects**
     - Examine the psychological effects on visitors who attend these sites. Does it contribute to a better understanding of history, or have negative impacts?

3. **Ensure Clarity:**
   - Use clear and understandable language to communicate these objectives effectively.

**Page 2: Informed Consent Form**

Ensure the consent form includes the requisite details, but also tailor it for a study on dark tourism:

1. **Introduction to Participant:**
   - Personalize the consent form with an understanding of the sensitive nature often associated with dark tourism.

2. **Purpose of the Study:**
   - State that the study seeks to understand more about the motivations, experiences, and impacts of visiting sites of dark tourism.

3. **Potential Emotional Impacts:**
   - Given the nature of dark tourism, include a statement on potential emotional impacts and offer support resources if necessary.

**Page 3 Onwards: Research Instrument**

1. **Introduction:**
   - Clearly state that the instrument (survey, interview questions, etc.) aims to gather data regarding experiences and perceptions in dark tourism.

2. **Sample Questions:**

   - **Motivation:**
     - "What motivated you to visit a dark tourism site?"
     - "Do you feel your expectations were met upon visiting the site? Why or why not?"

   - **Experience:**
     - "Describe your emotional response during the visit."
     - "What was the most memorable part of your visit, and why?"

   - **Impact:**
     - "How do you think your visit has affected your understanding of history?"
     - "What impact do you believe dark tourism has on the community surrounding the site?"

   - **Ethics:**
     - "Do you think it’s ethical to commercialize sites associated with tragedy? Explain your perspective."

3. **Structuring:**
   - Group questions into categories for motivation, experience, and impact for clarity and structure.

4. **Visual Layout:**
   - Ensure questions are well-formatted and easy to navigate for respondents.

By incorporating these tailored points, your document will offer a comprehensive and detailed framework for exploring the complex layers of dark tourism in your research.
User: give me 4 objectives to d my research on
Assistant: Sure, here are four research objectives tailored to a study on dark tourism:

1. **Identify Visitor Motivations:**
   - To analyze the various psychological, cultural, and social motivations that drive tourists to visit dark tourism sites, and how these motivations differ across demographics.

2. **Assess Socio-Economic Impacts:**
   - To evaluate the economic benefits and social effects of dark tourism on local communities, including job creation, community identity, and potential challenges such as commodification of tragedy.

3. **Examine Ethical Implications:**
   - To explore the ethical considerations involved in presenting and commercializing sites of historical trauma or tragedy, considering perspectives of stakeholders including local communities, tourists, and preservationists.

4. **Investigate Visitor Perceptions and Experiences:**
   - To assess how visitors perceive their experiences at dark tourism sites and the extent to which these visits influence their understanding of historical events and empathy towards affected communities.

These objectives should give you a clear framework for conducting comprehensive research on dark tourism, focusing on both visitor perspectives and broader impacts.
User: make it into pointers
Assistant: Certainly! Here are the research objectives presented as bullet points:

- **Identify Visitor Motivations:**
  - Analyze the psychological, cultural, and social motivations driving tourists to dark tourism sites.
  - Examine how these motivations differ across various demographics.

- **Assess Socio-Economic Impacts:**
  - Evaluate the economic benefits and social effects on local communities.
  - Consider both positive aspects (e.g., job creation) and challenges (e.g., commodification of tragedy).

- **Examine Ethical Implications:**
  - Explore ethical considerations in the presentation and commercialization of sites.
  - Gather perspectives from stakeholders such as local communities, tourists, and preservationists.

- **Investigate Visitor Perceptions and Experiences:**
  - Assess how visitors perceive their experiences at dark tourism sites.
  - Determine the influence of these visits on understanding historical events and empathy development.

These bullet-pointed objectives should provide clear and focused directions for your research on dark tourism.
User: make it sound professional
Assistant: Certainly! Here are your research objectives presented in a more professional tone:

- **Analyze Visitor Motivations:**
  - Explore the psychological, cultural, and social factors motivating individuals to engage in dark tourism.
  - Investigate demographic variations influencing these motivations and the implications for tourism management.

- **Evaluate Socio-Economic Impacts:**
  - Assess the economic advantages and social consequences of dark tourism on host communities.
  - Examine both the potential benefits, such as employment opportunities, and the challenges, including the possible commodification of historical tragedies.

- **Examine Ethical Considerations:**
  - Conduct a comprehensive analysis of the ethical dimensions involved in the presentation and commercialization of sites associated with historical trauma.
  - Gather insights from various stakeholders, including local community members, tourists, and heritage professionals, to inform ethical guidelines.

- **Assess Visitor Perceptions and Experiences:**
  - Investigate the perceptions and experiential outcomes for visitors to dark tourism sites.
  - Determine the extent to which these experiences influence visitors' understanding of historical events and foster empathy towards affected communities.

These professionally articulated objectives should set a comprehensive and scholarly framework for your research on dark tourism.
User: whats a better way to ask if someone has ever participated in fark tourism
Assistant: A more refined way to ask if someone has experienced dark tourism could be:

"Have you ever visited a site or destination associated with historical tragedy, death, or disaster as part of your travel experience?" 

This phrasing is clear and specific, and it avoids the potentially loaded term "dark tourism" while still conveying the concept.
User: i want the word dark tourism to be in it
Assistant: