System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
[Instruction]
Question: Tell me a bio of Tappaya Sit-Or.

[Ground truth Answer]
Tappaya Sit-Or is a Thai puppeteer, artist, performer, and the founder of the Joe-Louis Theatre. Born on May 5, 1959, in Bangkok, Thailand, he is the youngest son of Sakorn Yangkhiawsod, owner of Hun Lakorn Lek (small puppet troupe) in Thailand. From a young age, Tappaya was passionate about traditional Thai puppetry and dedicated his life to preserving this art form.

In 1985, he established the Joe-Louis Puppet Theatre in Bangkok to showcase and pay tribute to his father's work in the field of traditional Thai puppetry. The theatre became an important cultural institution in Thailand, attracting both local and international audiences. Its performances are known for their unique synthesis of live puppetry, traditional Thai music, and classical dance.

Under Tappaya's direction, the Joe-Louis Puppet Theatre has emerged as a leading voice in the world of Thai puppetry, receiving numerous awards for its excellence in the field. In addition to his work with the theatre, Tappaya is also an accomplished teacher, sharing his vast knowledge of puppetry with students and younger generations of puppeteers.

In 2004, after the theatre's original location closed down, Tappaya was instrumental in the revival of the Joe-Louis Puppet Theatre at the Asiatique The Riverfront in Bangkok, where it continues to entertain audiences today.

Tappaya Sit-Or's dedication to preserving the art of traditional Thai puppetry is evident through his work at the Joe-Louis Theatre, ensuring that this unique and important aspect of Thai culture endures for future generations.

[Assistant's Response]
As of my latest update, there is no widely recognized information available about an individual named Tappaya Sit-Or. This person may not be a public figure, or their prominence might have arisen after the last update of the data I have access to. If you can provide more context or details about who Tappaya Sit-Or is, I might be able to assist further or help in another way. For the most accurate and up-to-date information, consider checking recent news sources or online platforms.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: