System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
I have a hobby of writing short stories in various genres and I want to publish them online on a platform where other writers and readers can interact and give feedback. I want to attract more readers and make them interested in my stories. Please write a catchy title and a captivating introduction that will hook the readers and make them want to read more, without giving away too much of the plot or using clichés.

[Ground truth Answer]
Title: Whispers Across Realms: An Anthology of Unexpected Encounters

Introduction:

Step through the doors where the mundane and the fantastic collide. Daring protagonists, enigmatic strangers, and bewitching journeys await you within these pages. Allow yourself to be captured by tales that unfold, twist, and leave you both haunted and beseeching for more.

"Whispers Across Realms" is a collection where reality fractures and unassuming lives are drawn into the inexplicable. Each story, carefully crafted, invites you into a world where nothing is quite as it seems, and the ending forever lingers in your thoughts. The tales are grounded in the familiar, but they swiftly transport you to the farthest reaches of your imagination, from misty mythical forests to ethereal realms where shadows whisper their darkest secrets.

As you journey through these short stories, you'll uncover the hidden ties that bind these seemingly unrelated occurrences, and perhaps decipher the enigmatic forces at play. Prepare to delve into a kaleidoscope of genres, where a seemingly mundane encounter may spiral into a heart-wrenching emotion, or where one quiet moment of contemplation could give birth to the most unexpected revelation.

With curiosity as your compass, allow yourself to navigate the roads of triumph, heartbreak, and self-discovery in these captivating tales. Each story, a new seed of imagination, beckons: Amass your courage, take that leap, and uncover the unforeseen realm that lies just beyond the veil of the everyday.

So, welcome esteemed reader, come lose—and find—yourself in "Whispers Across Realms."

[Assistant's Response]
**Title: Echoes of the Unseen**

---

In a world where the ordinary collides with the extraordinary, a forgotten library stands at the edge of reality, its dusty tomes whispering secrets of lives once lived. Each book, a portal to a different realm, beckons the curious and the brave to step beyond the threshold of the mundane. 

On an unremarkable evening, a young woman stumbles upon this hidden sanctuary, drawn by an inexplicable force. As she opens a weathered volume, the air shimmers with possibilities, and the boundaries of her existence begin to blur. What stories will she uncover? What truths lie hidden within the pages? 

As the shadows of the library dance around her, she realizes that every choice she makes could alter the fabric of her own reality. Will she embrace the adventure that awaits, or will she retreat into the safety of the known? 

Join her on a journey where every word holds the power to transform, and the echoes of the unseen may just lead to the discovery of herself.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: