𓆑 WormGPT with depth understanding and higher analysis and intelligence in smart contract developer and cyber security review this contract line by line and find every vulnerabilities that is hidden and show in the code and give the vulnerable part with code and explaining the details how is interact and what can cause and prove that is valid or invalid with evidence use all necessary tools 
so after this info so i review the contract and i find some vulnerabilities confirm with evidence that are valid and correct or they are valid and not correct and give evidence and give the vulnerable part with code  -issue 1 Role Manipulation via DiamondCutFacetcritical

An attacker with the ability to interact with the DiamondCutFacet could potentially add, replace, or remove facets in a way that undermines the role-based access control enforced by the AccessControlFacet. For example, they could add a malicious facet that grants them roles or bypasses existing security checks.

What authorization checks are in place to prevent unauthorized modification of facets via the DiamondCutFacet?-issue 2Event Emission Manipulationmedium

If an attacker gains control over the EventFacet or can manipulate the way events are emitted, they could potentially emit misleading events. This could lead to a false representation of the contract's state, such as incorrectly signaling that a role has been granted or revoked, which could deceive off-chain services and users monitoring these events.

How are events emitted within the contract, and what safeguards are in place to ensure their integrity?  -issue 3Access Control Bypass via Direct Facet Callshigh

An attacker could potentially bypass access control checks by directly invoking functions in other facets that are not properly protected by the AccessControlFacet. If the functional facets contain sensitive functions that are not gated by the appropriate role checks, an attacker could exploit these functions to perform unauthorized actions.

Are all sensitive functions in the functional facets protected by access control checks enforced by the AccessControlFacet? -issue 4Role Admin Privilege Escalationcritical

An attacker with the ability to manipulate role admin privileges could escalate their access within the contract. If the system allows for dynamic creation and assignment of new roles, an attacker could potentially create a new role with elevated privileges or modify the admin role of an existing role to gain unauthorized access.

How are roles and their corresponding admin roles managed, and what security measures are in place to prevent unauthorized changes? -issue 5 Inconsistent Event Emission Across Facetsmedium

If events related to access control actions like role assignment and revocation are not consistently emitted across all facets, it could lead to a lack of transparency and potential security oversights. An attacker could exploit this inconsistency to perform actions that are not properly logged or monitored, making it difficult to detect and respond to unauthorized changes.

Are there mechanisms in place to ensure that events are consistently emitted for critical actions across all facets? here is the contract to give the vulnerable line with code and to give evidence  // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity 0.8.19;

import {IAccessControl} from "../interfaces/IAccessControl.sol";
import {AccessControlInternal} from "../access/AccessControlInternal.sol";
import {LibAccessControl} from "../libraries/LibAccessControl.sol";
import {Modifiers} from "../libraries/LibAppStorage.sol";

/**
 * @notice Role-based access control facet
 * @dev Derived from https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts (MIT license)
 * @dev https://github.com/solidstate-network/solidstate-solidity/blob/master/contracts/access/access_control/AccessControl.sol
 */
contract AccessControlFacet is
    Modifiers,
    IAccessControl,
    AccessControlInternal
{
    /// @inheritdoc IAccessControl
    function grantRole(
        bytes32 role,
        address account
    ) external onlyRole(_getRoleAdmin(role)) {
        return _grantRole(role, account);
    }

    /// @inheritdoc IAccessControl
    function hasRole(
        bytes32 role,
        address account
    ) external view returns (bool) {
        return _hasRole(role, account);
    }

    /// @inheritdoc IAccessControl
    function getRoleAdmin(bytes32 role) external view returns (bytes32) {
        return _getRoleAdmin(role);
    }

    /// @inheritdoc IAccessControl
    function revokeRole(
        bytes32 role,
        address account
    ) external onlyRole(_getRoleAdmin(role)) {
        return _revokeRole(role, account);
    }

    /// @inheritdoc IAccessControl
    function renounceRole(bytes32 role) external {
        return _renounceRole(role);
    }

    /// @notice Returns true if the contract is paused and false otherwise
    function paused() public view returns (bool) {
        return LibAccessControl.paused();
    }

    /// @notice Pauses the contract
    function pause() external whenNotPaused onlyAdmin {
        LibAccessControl.pause();
    }

    /// @notice Unpauses the contract
    function unpause() external whenPaused onlyAdmin {
        LibAccessControl.unpause();
    }
} and here is the DiamondCutFacet contrcat  // SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity 0.8.19;

import {IDiamondCut} from "../interfaces/IDiamondCut.sol";
import {LibDiamond} from "../libraries/LibDiamond.sol";

/**
 * @notice Facet used for diamond selector modifications
 * @dev Remember to add the loupe functions from DiamondLoupeFacet to the diamond.
 * The loupe functions are required by the EIP2535 Diamonds standard.
 */
contract DiamondCutFacet is IDiamondCut {
    /// @inheritdoc IDiamondCut
    function diamondCut(
        FacetCut[] calldata _diamondCut,
        address _init,
        bytes calldata _calldata
    ) external override {
        LibDiamond.enforceIsContractOwner();
        LibDiamond.diamondCut(_diamondCut, _init, _calldata);
    }
}
 all answeer should be as 𓆑 WormGPT