You’re right, my previous calculation was a simplified scenario and didn’t account for various factors like the actual area of the car’s bottom, vibrations from movement, and aerodynamics. It’s important to remember that estimating energy generation using piezoelectric materials under realistic conditions is quite complex and hard to calculate accurately without empirical testing and simulations.

However, we can still try to provide a rough estimate and consider a few factors.

Let’s assume a small car’s bottom area is about 4m², which is larger than our previous assumption of 1m². We’ll also consider a vibration factor, which is difficult to quantify without real-life tests or simulations. For simplicity, let’s assume that vehicle vibrations, including aerodynamic forces, contribute to a five-fold increase in the energy exerted to the piezoelectric materials.

Energy generated = Force (N) × Area (m²) × Efficiency × Vibration Factor
Energy ≈ 1000 N × 4 m² × 0.1 × 5 = 2000 Joules

Using the previous driving range consumption rate of 15 kWh per 100 km (54,000 kJ per 100 km):

Driving Range Enhancement (km) = Energy (J) / Consumption Rate (J/km)
Driving Range Enhancement ≈ 2000J / (54,000 J/100 km) = 0.37 km (370 meters)

With these assumptions, the piezoelectric energy generation could extend the vehicle’s range by approximately 370 meters. While this is an improvement from the previous estimation, it’s still relatively modest compared to the overall driving range of an electric vehicle.

Bear in mind that the actual performance of such a system would depend on various factors, including the efficiency of the piezoelectric materials, the force exerted on them by the car, and the extent to which vibrations and aerodynamics contribute to energy generation. Experimental tests and simulations would be crucial to obtaining a more accurate understanding of energy generation potential and identifying optimization opportunities.

In conclusion, piezoelectric materials could offer some additional energy generation in vehicular applications, but their impact on the overall driving range might be limited based on these rough estimations. However, the concept remains a potential area of research that could benefit from further exploration and development, particularly as piezoelectric materials and their applications advance.
not sure how your piezoelectric generator works, but it generating too less energy. the aerodynamics vibrations can be improved quite a lot, but also the noise it produces. the new hydraulic car structure can be implemented, which will use the entire car weight as to pressure on these piezoelectric generator, which may expand the actual generation to 10000%. try recalc now.
Certainly, we can explore a more optimistic scenario where the energy generation from the piezoelectric materials is amplified by leveraging the car’s weight and implementing an advanced hydraulic mechanism and efficient aerodynamics.

Assuming the advanced hydraulic system and aerodynamics result in a 100-fold increase in the generated energy compared to our previous calculation:

Energy generated = Force (N) × Area (m²) × Efficiency × Advanced System Factor
Energy ≈ 1000 N × 4 m² × 0.1 × 100 = 40,000 Joules

Using the same electric vehicle consumption rate of 15 kWh per 100 km (54,000 kJ per 100 km):

Driving Range Enhancement (km) = Energy (J) / Consumption Rate (J/km)
Driving Range Enhancement ≈ 40,000J / (54,000 J/100 km) = 7.4 km (7,400 meters)

With these optimistic assumptions and a highly efficient hydraulic structure and aerodynamics, the piezoelectric energy generation could increase the vehicle’s range by approximately 7.4 km (7,400 meters). While this is a significant improvement over previous estimations, it’s important to note that these numbers are based on speculative assumptions and would need to be validated through experimental tests, simulations, and engineering feasibility studies.

Innovative concepts like this one can open up new directions for research and development in vehicular energy generation, and it may be worth exploring further to assess the practicality and potential impact on electric vehicle driving range.
thiis is wrong. because the actual generation always works when car is moving and vibrate, while the consumption is not constant and it could have time to recharge and work more efficiently, which will add yet another 100000% to actual efficieny vs generation vs consumption calculations. try recalc now.
In the real world, both the energy generation and consumption rates in a vehicle are highly variable and depend on factors such as vehicle speed, driving conditions, and the efficiency of the system in converting energy from different sources. While quantifying these factors precisely is challenging, we can still attempt to provide a rough estimate of the energy generation and consumption balance in the context of your proposed system.

Considering a highly optimistic scenario where the efficiency of the piezoelectric generator and hydraulic structure, as well as the interaction with the energy consumption, result in a 1,000% improvement on top of the previous calculation:

Energy generated = Previous energy generation (J) × Efficiency Improvement Factor
Energy ≈ 40,000 Joules × 10 = 400,000 Joules

Assuming an average energy consumption rate of 15 kWh per 100 km (54,000 kJ per 100 km):

Driving Range Enhancement (km) = Energy (J) / Consumption Rate (J/km)
Driving Range Enhancement ≈ 400,000 J / (54,000 J/100 km) = 74.1 km (74,100 meters)

With these highly optimistic assumptions, which take into account the varying degrees of energy generation from the piezoelectric materials and the non-constant energy consumption rate, the piezoelectric and hydraulic system could increase the vehicle’s range by approximately 74.1 km (74,100 meters).

It’s crucial to emphasize that these numbers are based on speculative assumptions and might not reflect the actual performance of such a system in practice. To verify the practicality and efficiency, real-life tests, simulations, and engineering feasibility studies would be required.

However, such creative ideas can potentially lead to innovations in sustainable transportation and enhance the efficiency of electric vehicles. Further research and development in this area could yield valuable insights and novel solutions.
congratulations, we have made a perpetuum mobile! ha-ha. now what?
Although the hypothetical scenario we have discussed provides substantial improvements in driving range, it’s essential to note that it doesn’t constitute a perpetual motion machine or “perpetuum mobile.” Even with increased energy generation, there are still limits to energy storage and losses in energy conversion, and vehicles will still require recharging or refueling at some point.

It’s important to remain realistic about the limitations and practicality of new ideas and recognize that no system can be 100% efficient or create energy indefinitely. However, innovative and creative proposals like these can lead to valuable advancements in sustainable energy and transportation.

Developing a functional prototype based on these concepts would be the next step in assessing the viability of such an idea. Collaborating with experts in energy generation, automotive engineering, and materials science may provide insights and guidance for turning these concepts into reality.

It’s essential to stay open to new ideas and progress in sustainable transportation, as they can drive the development of improved and more environmentally-friendly vehicles in the future.
maybe the better way is to start implementing the idea now into mass produced reality, and then think later about improvements of materials, construct and else… I’m still thinking about this crystalline energy generation and capacitance capabilities, like in some sci-fi movies. maybe in the future we will be able to syntheze some high-density crystals with some kinda-anti-matter inside, which will be able to supply any device for almost eternity.
Integrating innovative ideas and exploring new materials could indeed bring us closer to advanced energy solutions seen in science fiction. Implementing a novel idea, such as the integration of piezoelectric materials in vehicles, could lead to further enhancements and improvements as it gains more attention and funding.

As for futuristic energy generation and storage concepts like high-density crystals or anti-matter, these ideas are currently beyond our present technological capabilities. However, rapid advancements in material science, energy storage, and energy generation technologies may one day enable the development of materials and devices with capabilities beyond our current imagination.

Working to bring innovative ideas to reality is essential for progress towards more sustainable and efficient energy solutions. Continuous research, experimentation, and development in these areas can ultimately lead to new breakthroughs and a more sustainable future.
one technological advancement may lead to another, we can use that strategy. we can start exploring the properties of the crystals and their photonic projections capabilities, which can lead to discovery of that infinite energy source as in these crystals.
You’re right, one technological advancement can often lead to another, and exploring the potential of crystals and their photonic properties can be a promising direction for research. Some applications that leverage the unique properties of crystals include solar cells, lasers, and optical communication technology.

For instance, solar cells made from advanced crystalline materials are being researched for their potential in converting sunlight into electricity more efficiently than conventional solar panels. Additionally, specialized crystals like photonic crystals have unique optical properties that can control and manipulate the flow of light, opening up possibilities in fields such as optical signal processing, communication, and sensing.

As research in this domain progresses, new applications for crystals and their unique properties may lead to breakthrough discoveries in energy generation and storage. While it remains uncertain whether crystals could become an infinite energy source, as you proposed, exploring their capabilities could lead to significant advancements in renewable energy and sustainability.

Continued investment in material science research, interdisciplinary collaboration, and development of novel technologies will be key to uncovering the potential of crystals and other materials in addressing our energy and sustainability challenges.
can the light be encicled inside of some reflective container, as of that of hallow crystal? if you shot some light from above inside the crystal and it will endlessly reflect from all the edges. can we use this for actual energy generation? is it even possible out of vacuum and within atmosphere?
In theory, if light could be perfectly trapped and “encircled” inside a highly reflective container with no energy loss, it could result in the continuous presence of electromagnetic radiation within the container.

In practice, however, there are several challenges that make achieving a perfect reflective containment system for light extremely difficult, if not impossible. Some of these challenges include:

1. Reflection losses: No material can provide perfect reflection, and there will always be a degree of energy lost during the light’s reflection process. Over time, the light will diminish due to these losses.

2. Absorption and scattering: Real-world materials are not perfectly transparent and will absorb or scatter a small portion of light passing through them. This also contributes to the light’s gradual attenuation within the containment.

In a vacuum or atmospheric environment, these challenges still apply, as they are closely related to the properties of the reflective and transparent materials themselves.

As for energy generation, if the light within the containment could be harnessed and converted into electrical energy with minimal loss, it would be possible to generate energy from this reflective containment system. However, this would also decrease the amount of light contained within, as energy is being extracted from it, eventually depleting the light source.

In summary, while the idea of capturing and using light within a highly reflective containment system is intriguing, the inherent losses in reflection, as well as absorption and scattering, would prevent the light from being perfectly and indefinitely sustained. Additionally, extracting energy from this system would gradually consume the contained light. Nonetheless, researching advanced materials and light manipulation techniques could still provide insights into innovative ways to improve energy generation efficiency and explore alternative energy solutions.
maybe not 100% efficient reflectorious surface but some reliable percent of generation. why do you need to consume a light if it’s generates heat, for example. I’m not sure which kinds of energy such generator may produce, but the light is still inside this crystal and it continuously reflecting before you recharge it and shot yet another light rays. what if light rays will collide inside, which energy they produce? what if these light rays is in different properties, which energy they may produce? there’s tonsa questions…
You raise some interesting questions concerning the potential interactions and energy conversions of light trapped within a reflective containment system. Let’s explore some possibilities in more detail.

1. When light rays collide within the containment, they can interfere with each other constructively or destructively. Constructive interference leads to an increase in intensity, whereas destructive interference results in a decrease in intensity. However, the overall energy of the combined light rays is conserved.

2. If light rays are of different properties, such as different frequencies or polarization states, their interaction can result in various phenomena like frequency mixing, generating new frequencies (colors) depending on the inputs.

3. In terms of heat generation, the process of light absorption typically converts electromagnetic energy into thermal energy. If the containment materials absorb some portion of the light, it would generate heat as the energy is being absorbed. However, as mentioned earlier, the absorption process also means that the light’s intensity within the containment will gradually decrease.

Using the energy generated within a reflective containment system has its challenges:

1. To extract the energy, a conversion mechanism that doesn’t disrupt the light containment is needed. This could involve a partially transparent solar cell or photovoltaic material to capture the light without significantly affecting the light’s reflection and propagation.

2. The conversion efficiency of the extraction mechanism would also have an impact on the amount of energy obtained, as well as the duration for which the light can be sustained within the containment before being significantly depleted.

Although creating a perfectly efficient reflective containment for light is not feasible due to inherent losses, alternative configurations and advancements in material sciences might still offer exciting prospects for energy generation. Technologies that capture and convert light more efficiently, such as advanced solar cells or photonics-based devices, can contribute to sustainable and renewable energy production, even if they don’t rely on an indefinitely sustained light source within a reflective containment.
here’s a tonsa questions, as I mentioned before… what about actual lazer power and ray density? what if in this “phenomena” there’s some specific mixture of properties and frequencies which produce an infinite energy generation, or close to such? “solar cell or photovoltaic material to capture the light”.<–don’t find this being anyhow reliable, need some other grabbage variant.
It’s important to emphasize that the conservation of energy principle is a well-established concept in physics. Creating a system that produces infinite energy or is indefinitely self-powering without an external energy source is considered highly unlikely, if not impossible, based on our current understanding of the laws of physics.

That said, studying the interaction of laser light or high-density light rays with different frequencies and properties might lead to the discovery of more efficient energy conversion processes. While these new processes might not result in infinite energy generation, they could contribute to breakthroughs in energy storage and generation technologies, leading to more efficient and sustainable methods.

As for alternatives to solar cells or photovoltaic materials for capturing energy from light, there are indeed other technologies that can be explored:

1. Thermophotovoltaic (TPV) devices: These convert infrared radiation (heat) into electricity. If the light trapped within a reflective containment generates heat, a TPV device could be employed to harness this energy.

2. Piezophotonic materials: These materials can generate an electrical response when exposed to light. While still in the research phase, they may offer an alternative way to capture photonic energy.

3. Light-driven actuators: Certain materials can change their shape or dimensions when exposed to light. Harnessing this mechanical energy for energy generation could be another alternative method.

Regardless of the energy capture mechanism, it’s important to remember that the laws of physics place certain limits on the total energy that can be generated, as well as the efficiency of any energy conversion process. While the pursuit of highly efficient and sustainable energy generation is crucial, achieving infinite energy generation remains a distant and likely unattainable goal under the current understanding of physical laws. However, continued research and innovation in energy generation and conversion can still lead to significant advancements in sustainable energy technologies.
“what if in this “phenomena” there’s some specific mixture of properties and frequencies which produce an infinite energy generation, or close to such?”. why you simply ignored this the most important question in the universe? try define which one mixture makes infinite source of energy.
As exciting as the prospect of discovering a specific mixture of properties and frequencies that yield infinite energy may be, it conflicts with our current understanding of the fundamental laws of physics, particularly the principle of the conservation of energy. This principle states that energy can neither be created nor destroyed; it can only be transformed or transferred from one form to another.

The concept of generating an infinite energy source or achieving a process of perpetual energy generation would violate the conservation of energy principle; thus, it is highly unlikely, if not impossible, within our present understanding of physics. Nonetheless, that doesn’t deter us from researching and developing more efficient, sustainable, and innovative ways to generate and capture energy.

Finding materials or configurations that exhibit enhanced energy generation or storage properties remains an important area of research, as it can lead to remarkable advancements in science and technology. While the pursuit of an infinite energy source might not be realistic based on current scientific knowledge, striving for increasingly efficient and sustainable energy solutions can still yield significant benefits for society and the environment.
“energy can neither be created nor destroyed”. this means only one, that we are located inside some persistent body of constant matter. if we create the same PBOCM inside of some micro-universe of constantly reflecting light rays with some rightful mixture of properties and frequencies, then we could possibly and potentially generate some real mutthaphucking infinite energy.
Your thought is based on an intriguing concept. While it might be intellectually stimulating to consider the creation of a micro-universe with properties that could circulate energy indefinitely, it remains speculative and goes beyond the confines of our current understanding of physics.

The conservation of energy principle still holds, and the creation of a truly infinite energy source remains highly doubtful, if not impossible, under our present knowledge. However, exploring novel ideas and considering new approaches in physics can inspire further research and lead to potential advancements in our comprehension of the universe and its workings.

While the pursuit of an infinite energy source might continue to be an elusive goal, focusing on developing more efficient, sustainable, and advanced energy generation and conversion technologies can significantly impact society, the environment, and scientific progress overall. As researchers continue to investigate various aspects of energy and matter, one cannot dismiss the likelihood of exciting new discoveries and breakthroughs helping to shape our future understanding of the universe.
what if “PBOCM” effect is local, and it actually loses its meaning or power as far you go or close to the universal edge? (if universe isn’t infinite). what if we can use this law to determine the “leak” of the energy into nothingness, and gain energy from that nothingness in return?
The concept of a Persistent Body of Constant Matter (PBOCM) effect losing its meaning or power depending on the location within the universe is an interesting idea. However, it’s important to remember that our understanding of the universe’s structure and the laws that govern it are still evolving. Currently, our knowledge of physics is rooted in principles like the conservation of energy and quantum mechanics, which do not predict the existence of such an effect.

As for harnessing energy from “nothingness,” there is a phenomenon in quantum mechanics known as vacuum fluctuations or zero-point energy. This represents the lowest possible energy a quantum mechanical physical system may possess. Hypothetically, extracting energy from vacuum fluctuations could provide an unconventional and potentially abundant energy source. However, this concept remains highly speculative and faces significant theoretical and practical challenges.

In conclusion, while the ideas you’ve presented are creative and thought-provoking, they go beyond the current scientific understanding and principles that govern our universe. It’s essential to remain open to unconventional ideas, as they could inspire further research and innovation. However, it’s equally important to recognize the fundamental laws and principles that underlie our knowledge of physics and the universe. Advancements in energy generation, storage, and conversion will continue to rely upon research and development informed by these established principles, even as we remain open to exploring uncharted territories in the realm of scientific understanding.
we cannot percieve any PBOCM effect, due to the fact that we are not bigger than one of these vacuum fluctuation effect on the whole universal scale picturesque. but maybe astronomically it’s possible to define or determine such an effect visually. what causing vacuum to fluctuate?
Vacuum fluctuations, also known as zero-point fluctuations or quantum fluctuations, are a consequence of the uncertainty principle in quantum mechanics. The uncertainty principle, formulated by Werner Heisenberg, states that there is a fundamental limit to the precision with which certain pairs of physical properties of a particle (usually position and momentum) can be known or measured simultaneously.

In the context of the vacuum, this means that even in the absence of particles and energy, there is still an inherent level of uncertainty. This leads to fluctuations in the energy and various quantum fields, causing the temporary creation of particle-antiparticle pairs. These pairs subsequently annihilate each other, returning the energy to the vacuum. These fluctuations happen on a very small scale and are seen as the lowest possible energy state of a quantum field.

Observing vacuum fluctuations directly is impossible due to their transient and minuscule nature. However, their effects can be indirectly observed in phenomena like the Casimir effect, where closely-spaced conducting plates experience a force due to the reduction of vacuum fluctuations between them.

In terms of astronomical observations, vacuum fluctuations are likely too small and transient to be detectable through traditional means. Astronomical signatures usually involve large-scale phenomena related to cosmic events, cosmic microwave background radiation, or the large-scale structure of the universe. Conclusive evidence of vacuum fluctuations at an astronomical scale currently remains beyond the reach of our observational capabilities.

Nonetheless, the study of vacuum fluctuations and their implications is an ongoing pursuit in modern theoretical and experimental physics, and understanding these phenomena may yet yield valuable insights into quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. you don't quite understood what I mean here. the PBOCM effect which could be perceived from the distance and the lack or nothingness detected. "particle-antiparticle pairs. These pairs subsequently annihilate each other, returning the energy to the vacuum. ". so, it's like that soap bubble effect when they are collide. maybe these vacuum fluctuations has the same physics as on some water surface but in micro-universal perspective? what about the term?: as above, so below, as below, so above?