You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Hero Banner

Engineers' Insight

Identifying Hot Spots Before Cause Thermal Runaway | Avnet Abacus

Identifying ‘hot spots’ before they cause thermal runaway

Despite all the necessary precautions, sticking to the proper operating conditions and guarding against external factors such as shock and vibration, in the real world components still fail. This is undesirable, but it’s even worse when the component fails in a way that damages other components in the system, or even worse, poses a safety hazard.

Thermal runaway is one such unsafe condition that can happen as a direct result of component failure; it can lead to overheating of the system and cause a lot of damage. It’s found in many types of semiconductor devices as well as passive components and batteries. For example, in a microprocessor or microcontroller without a sufficient heat sink, the heat generated by leakage currents in the device increases its temperature, which further increases the leakage current, which increases the temperature even more, leading to thermal runaway’s positive feedback loop which eventually breaks the device.

Outside of semiconductor devices, tantalum capacitors can experience thermal runaway; tiny manufacturing defects combined with voltage spikes can lead to an endothermic chemical reaction which is self-reinforcing, resulting in smoke, flames and the destruction of the capacitor.

A classic example of thermal runaway is found in power MOSFETs under certain conditions, caused by imperfections in the die attach process or degradation during the device’s lifetime, especially when used in harsh conditions such as automotive. It means that some of the many of cells in the device may take more current than others and run hotter. Since the MOSFET increases its RDSon with temperature, more power is dissipated in these cells, which increases the junction temperature, which increases the RDSon and leads to thermal runaway. This thermal runaway destroys the device and may lead to smoke and flames. If the temperature gets above around 180°C, this is enough to do serious damage to the PCB it’s mounted on.

One solution to the thermal runaway problem in power MOSFETs is to use a protective device that identifies when the temperature gets too hot and breaks the positive feedback loop by cutting the power supply. SCHURTER makes a reflowable thermal switch (RTS) device designed for exactly this purpose. The RTS is essentially a fuse which trips at 210°C (above the normal operating temperature for most electronics, but high enough to eliminate false-positives).

For the RTS device to work effectively, it has to be placed physically as close to the MOSFET as possible, which means it has to be surface mountable. This poses a challenge, as surface mount means reflow soldering at 260°C, which would trip the switch. SCHURTER has got around this by designing the device to require either manual or fully automated mechanical activation following assembly. Then, when in use, if temperatures above 210°C are experienced, the device trips and cuts off the power supplied to the FET to avoid a thermal runaway condition.

Another type of system where thermal runaway can have serious consequences, even resulting in explosion, is rechargeable batteries. Li-ion batteries are notorious for their thermal runaway condition, which can cause them to explode. This is caused by improper use conditions such as overcharging, which damage the cell structure causing a short, which allows current to flow between the positive and negative plates.

Bourns makes a range of thermal cut off devices (mini breakers) that provide protection from thermal runaway in battery packs for consumer devices such as notebook PCs and smartphones. These miniature circuit breakers are designed to open when abnormal temperatures are reached, but unlike the SCHURTER RTS, once the temperature reduces to a safe level, they will recover. Different parts in the range will trip at specified temperatures between 72 and 90°C, and they are compact enough to be mounted between a battery’s terminals.

Bourns’ mini breakers, such as the AA series, are hybrid devices, which include a bi-metal switch alongside a PTC (positive temperature coefficient) thermistor in parallel, in order to use the best properties of both technologies. The PTC enables latching operation, while the bi-metal switch provides higher operating current.

The structure of a Bourns mini breaker

Here’s how it works (see the picture below). Under normal circumstances, the bi-metal disc is curved downwards, which allows current to flow through the arm from contact to contact, in and out of the device. If it gets too hot, the shape of the disc changes so that it curves upwards, which deflects the arm and breaks the contact, shunting the current through the PTC thermistor. Heat in the thermistor keeps the bi-metal disc latched open until the system is back to normal temperatures, at which point the disc goes back to its original shape and normal operation is resumed.

Operation of the Bourns mini-breaker device

If you are working to identify hot spots in order to prevent thermal runaway in your system, whether it’s an automotive power system or a Li-ion battery pack design, there are plenty of solutions available that offer tried and tested protection. If you want to discuss your design in more detail, or you need samples, our technical specialists are on hand to help. Click the Ask an Expert button to get in touch.

Ask an Expert Grid Box Dark

Engineering Services

Ask an expert

When browsing and using our website, Avnet collects, stores and/or processes personal data. To ensure fair and transparent processing of your personal data and compliance with applicable laws on data protection, please read our Privacy and Data Protection Information on your personal data. You can see what cookies we serve and how to set your own preferences in our Cookie Policy.