"A recent event on campus took an interesting turn when a conservative student leader, Charlie Kirk, and his guest, Vivek Ramaswamy, faced off with a woke student who was determined to challenge their views. The event, which was part of Kirk's "You're Being Brainwashed" tour, was designed to give students a chance to engage in open dialogue with the conservative leaders.

The woke student, who was visibly nervous, began by asking Kirk and Ramaswamy if they were proud to be debating young people who were "unprepared to speak in front of an audience" like themselves. However, Kirk was quick to turn the tables by asking who was being "brainwashed" and how the student was being informed about current events. Ramaswamy chimed in, pointing out that the student seemed to be more interested in personal attacks than in focusing on the substance of the issues.

As the conversation continued, the woke student struggled to provide specific examples to support their claims, while Kirk and Ramaswamy stood firm in their convictions. The event drew a large crowd, with many students from both sides of the aisle coming to watch the debate.

In a surprising twist, one student in the audience, who identified as a "fellow right-wing person," praised Kirk for his stance on social security, saying that he agreed with Kirk's assessment that retirement is not biblical. Another student, who was holding up a campaign sign for a presidential candidate, expressed her disagreement with Kirk's views on women's roles in society.

Despite the heated discussion, the event remained civil, with both sides showing a willingness to engage in open dialogue. As Kirk and Ramaswamy left the stage, they were met with cheers and applause from their supporters, while the woke student remained speechless, unable to counter the conservative leaders' arguments."

"In an explosive moment on a college campus, a woke student decided to take on conservative heavyweights Charlie Kirk and Vivek Ramaswamy, but things didn’t go as planned. What started as a seemingly confident question quickly turned into a disaster for the student, who struggled to keep up with the back-and-forth.

It all began when the student boldly asked, "Do you feel proud of yourself for debating college kids who are unprepared to speak in front of an audience like yourself?" With a smirk, the student tried to corner Kirk and Ramaswamy, claiming it was "silly" for a 30-year-old to debate younger, less experienced students. But Kirk, always quick on his feet, hit back, "Wait, how is this any different than a professor talking to you? And who are you to decide who gets to ask questions?"

The student, visibly thrown off, attempted to argue that Kirk’s conservative stance on issues like abortion and LGBTQ+ rights was “dangerous” and that he edited content to make his opponents look bad. Vivek Ramaswamy stepped in, calmly asking for specifics on where the student disagreed. "Let’s focus on substance. Where exactly do you disagree with us on policy?"

The student hesitated, admitting they were nervous but continued to accuse Kirk and Ramaswamy of pushing harmful agendas. When pressed for examples, they mentioned “laws against the LGBTQ community,” but failed to provide any specifics. Ramaswamy used the moment to drill down on the core issue, explaining that while adults are free to live how they want, they are not free to indoctrinate children or impose their beliefs in schools or sports.

The student, struggling to maintain their composure, accused Kirk of antagonizing people on campus. But Kirk wasn’t having it: "You came up here voluntarily. You didn’t have to. And now that we’re having an open dialogue, let’s stick to the facts instead of personal attacks."

As the conversation drew to a close, Ramaswamy summed up the issue, pointing out that real progress is made when we debate substance, not personal attacks. "If we agree on protecting kids while allowing adults to live freely, we’ve made some progress," he said, leaving the student speechless."

these were the scripts i sent to the client as a script writing sample with the source https://youtu.be/U_BY2ENwPyA?si=pOj4VV4kNueJ-j52&t=355 and he said "The script seems nearly good. But I think it should collect from more multiple sources, and don't spend too much text on it" " I think it have a little bit long text between cut clip, so maybe reduce viewers’ attention.
basically, i pretend to make it like this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nO02Jxktku0
where it can start with a clip cut from a top moment, then a strong statement narratives, and some introduction of our characters, then go on narratives and clip cut, so on…"

so please make a new script only just like the one he wants and it should be on the new source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m1jSoIOgkis