Abstract
The paper is going to probe the participating nature and relations of China's super-project "Belt and Road" Initiative and fundamental principles of international economic law. Through an in-depth literature review, the work is going to present a clear elaboration of how the fundamental principles of sovereign equality; mutual benefit; win-win cooperation; Sustainable development; openness and inclusiveness in international economic law would render a sound legal basis and realistic guidance for the BRI. As validated by the research, these principles have not only been incorporated in the policy objectives and cooperation models of the BRI but also provide essential support to common development and shared prosperity of all participating countries. From both theoretical and practical perspectives, the paper has significance for further deep development in BRI and creating a closer legal and economic cooperation among the countries along the Belt and Road.

Background
After the Second World War, international economic law, as a new and independent legal concept, gained recognition all over the world. The spirit of multilateralism and the Bretton Woods system became the modern focus of international economic law in maintaining world peace and developing the economy. But the unilateral moves taken by the US and the ever-stronger trade friction among major powers, such as the China-US disputes and US-EU disputes, serve to strengthen globally the looming threat posed to the system of multilateral trading. Under the spreading shadow of unilateralism, populism, and protectionism, the so-called "rules-based" and "authorization for retaliation" mechanisms of the system of multilateral trade are more readily faced with flagrant challenges. What is more, the retreat of major powers from the existing system and the adoption of unilateral tariff retaliation have actually pushed the World Trade Organization-the only multilateral trade system created in the post-World War II period-to the sidelines. It is incompatible with the developing trends of world multipolarity, economic globalization, and cultural diversity to implement tariff-based trade confrontation under the very noses of the economy detrimental to development. This not only does not achieve the expected goal of the measures themselves but also hampers domestic and international economies along with their development. What is more, the disturbance caused in the international economic order and the development environment will necessarily result in immeasurable losses of interests and unpredictable risks of warfare.

The BRI is a major intellectual wealth proposed by China for the international economic law and legal governance. It represents a new path of international economic cooperation that meets the needs of the ever-changing trends in international economic development. The BRI is multilateral, emphasizes shared responsibility, and is marked by financial dominance, fairness, and justice, providing new cues and instructions for re-conceptualizing the guiding principles of international economic law regimes, consolidating and strengthening core institutions, and solving the mysterious predicaments. From its inherent features, the BRI has put forward new directions for international economic law in the aspects of guiding ideology, maintenance, and the development of key institutions as well as tackling perplexing predicaments. Especially in the post-pandemic era, it's all the more important to continuously push forward high-standard, efficient, high-quality, and highly-resilient construction of the BRI within the framework of international economic law to make greater contributions to world peace and economic development.

Over the past two years, the COVID-19 pandemic has hit the world economy heavily. International trade has been shrinking, personnel exchanges have been limited, and commodity prices have fluctuated. Nevertheless, the US and other Western countries have resorted to rabid competition and technological monopoly in an attempt to prevent China's development, making it extremely difficult to construct the BRI. Faced with such formidable obstacles, China has kept her strategic focus and relocated lessly initiated the high-quality development of the BRI. In the process of the BRI areas' construction, policy communication, facility connectivity, unimpeded trade, and financing have all made positive progress during the pandemic, which demonstrates that they have strong vitality in response to the pandemic and remarkable resilience in the fight against the pandemic-incidentally playing a very important role in stabilizing and reviving the world economy. Why the BRI will inevitably keep moving forward even during the pandemic is that the new development-directed globalization advocated by China complements the irreversible trend of economic globalization. Advertise more and press ahead with high-level, efficient, high-quality and highly-resilient construction of the BRI within the framework of international economic law in the post-pandemic era.

Explanation of the concepts
1. Independence and an evolution in the process

The rise and growth of the legislations and regulations controlling international economic law have only taken place in the modern period. This happened along with increasing legislative regulations by various countries on foreign trade and external economic matters, under the influence of mercantilist as well as free trade-minded ideologies. Although the independence and real core for the development in the modern international economic law was after the two world wars. Since World War II, the capitalist forces of Western European countries, previously dominant, were on the downhill and urgently needed to revitalize their post-war economies. On the other hand, the United States emerged as the sole capitalist power with unparalleled economic prowess. The ramifications of realism on "power defining benefits" that was almost universally accepted in the international community favorably helped the United States institute liberalism, setting an international economic structure based on the Bretton Woods system. Paid to this international system, a new institution founded on currency and commerce provided a basis for gradual changes and development in the international economic order.

2.The Post-Dissolution International Economic Order of the Bretton Woods System

The international economic legal ordering system that had at its axis the Bretton Woods system provided three decades of global economic growth and dynamism, yet with defects. The defects over time led to the collapse of this system. In the first place, the US dollar underpinned the international monetary system. Events at the world arena made it imperative that the US dollar as an international payment currency remained stable in order to maintain stability in the international payment system. It therefore required that the United States had enough reserve in gold to stabilize its international balance of payment through the maintenance of a surplus that would enable gold to flow into the country. Others had to run a balance of payment deficit all the while to manage to hold enough foreign exchange reserves to back their currencies; hence all that happened was a paradox.
Further, international crises were more common, resulting in wide swings in the capitalist world economy. During the 1960s, the United States' venture in overseas wars brought about home fiscal deficits, and the government had to print more dollars to cover this. As well nickel inflation' corresponded to domestic inflation. At the same time, the boom in the economies of Western Europe changed the US trade balance into a deficit, resulting in excess supply of dollars and considerable weakening of the dollar's exchange rate. This finally culminated in the collapse of the dollar-to-gold conversions and the fixed exchange rate system. The dollar-centered international monetary system busted and the entire Western economy fell into stagflation, while the high-welfare states plunged into crises leading to the weakening of international economic legal mechanisms and thus came the end of the Bretton Woods system.

3. Some Basic Principles of Contemporary International Economic Law :

Free Trade Principle: One of the guiding principles of international economic law, free trade increases movement of goods, services, and capital across borders by lowering barriers to trade. Free trade gains back impetus from economic growth and development.
Most Favored Nation Treatment Principle: This is the principle that ensures any favorable treatment that a country extends to one nation is equally extended to any other nations with which it has trade relations. In another perspective, it means special treatment accorded to one country can therefore not be applied universally to all its trading partners.
National Treatment Principle: It means that a country should offer foreign enterprises treatment no less favorable than that accorded to a domestic enterprise so that fair competition can be ensured in the domestic market.
Principle of Non-discrimination: Special or differential treatment to imported products, imported services, or foreign investors is inherently discouraged with this principle. The rule is directed towards ensuring fair competition of international markets.
Dispute Resolution Principle: International economic law lays down mechanisms for settlement of international trade disputes. Mechanisms of dispute settlement within the World Trade Organization, for instance, ensure that trade disputes are settled in the proper manner.
Principle of Transparency and Predictability: It says that rules should be transparent, consistent and predictable for the stable growth of trade and investment.
Principle of Cooperation: International economic law seeks the cooperation of countries who would like to negotiate and solve economic problems at an international level for mutual development and prosperity.

4. Silk Road Economic Belt

The Belt and Road is a big development strategy for China with an objective of increasing the level of connectivity between participating countries and enhancing economic cooperation. Broadly, it is a referendum, co-building, and shared benefits. Generally speaking, it aims at infrastructural connectivity, trade cooperation, investment cooperation, and people-to-people exchange between participating nations. Important features and objectives:
These actually include the ones in relation to infrastructure, trade and investment, energy cooperation, financial services, and cultural exchanges, among many others. They have been lined up in a bid that they foster regional development and cooperation.
Cooperation Mechanisms. In this very Belt and Road Initiative, there exist some institutions and platforms that the China mandates to involve itself in realizing better investment cooperation in these countries and give them financial support by virtue of the Silk Road Fund as well as the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB).
Objectives of the Development The overall goal of the Belt and Road Initiative is to promote mutual benefit to all participating countries. It allows for establishing an open, inclusive, and balanced climate of cooperation that is a win-win situation in facilitating international and regional economic development.

Research Purpose
The major aim of the literature review will be to attempt a critical analysis of the very basics of international economic law in paradigm to China's "Belt and Road" initiative. Accordingly, the paper looks forward to appraising how such mega-strategy from a new level is consonant with the very basics that regulate the global economic world.

What are the basic principles of international economic law: equality, mutual benefit, justice, fairness, and sustainable development?
To what extent have these principles been taken into consideration and realized in the Belt and Road Initiative?
Due to the perspective of the principle of cooperation, as well as that of sound development, how do the chosen international economic law principles find a most specific relation to and expression in the context of the Belt and Road co-operation framework?
What does interaction between the Belt and Road Initiative and international economic law fundamentals imply about research and policy considerations?

By answering these questions, the paper shall have made an attempt at a comprehensive understanding of the relationship evolving between the Belt and Road Initiative and the fundamental principles of international economic law.

Research Significance
It is significant to examine the extent to which the Belt and Road Initiative adheres to the principles at its heart from an academic as well as a practical point of view. Based on the presented material, the review contributes to scholarly discourse in several key ways:

Theoretical Contribution: This case provides a subtle, but much-needed explanation of ways through which a major national development strategy like the BRI could fit into major principles that guide the global economic order. Firstly, it presents a contribution to knowledge at the interface between international economic law and national policy frameworks.

Practical Implications From this review, findings may inform policymakers and Belt and Road Initiative stakeholders. In this case, they will make decisions informed by the practical application of international economic law principles relevant to guide cooperation in ways congruent with global economic governance norms.

Interdisciplinary Perspectives This review involves contributions by international scholars, and hence there is a wide diversity of the existing standpoints as well as approaches in the study of the involved intersection of Belt and Road initiative with international economic law. The interdisciplinary approach contributes to more profound depth in trying to understand such a complex topic.

Future Research Directions : In this Review, it is also pointed to possible directions of future research, for instance, how specific principles of international economic law will develop with respect to new global initiatives of development. These ideas can be useful in defining the further research agenda on this matter.
Work Plan

In order to write this literature review about the "Specific Analysis of the Basic Principles of Global Cooperation under the Framework of International Economic Law—Based on the 'the Belt and Road' national top-level cooperation initiative", the following steps shall be done henceforth in this paper.

1. Literature Collection and Organization

Search and sort-out related Chinese and English literature of "Belt and Road" initiatives as well as the basic theories of international economic law
Read the relevant literature; ability to make sense of them on the basis of observation and analysis of foreign experts
Literature database where authors classify, index and upload the collected materials

2. Drafting Outline

- Based on the title and requirements of the paper, make an outline and structure for the paper that is thorough
   Major content of, and emphasis to be placed on different sections
   Explicit and reasonable hierarchical structure and logical relationship between different sections

3. First Drafting

   Fill out the paper content part by part according to the outline
- Absorb literature perspectives and complete analysis and discussion
- Ensure that the idea is properly expressed and the flow is logical

4. Citation and Format Standardization

   - Carefully explore the accuracy and format of the citations
   - Make certain that it would be in the academic format for citation
   - Properly format the reference list also

5. Revision and Polishing of Paper
- Revise the paper content repeatedly, perfect expressions and argumentations
   - Read very carefully over the whole paper to avoid any errors or formatting issues
   - Add, delete, and change appropriate content

6. Final Paper Completeness
   - Put all sections together as one complete paper
Ensure the paper structure is comprehensive, the content is substantive, and the language-fluent
   Submit the final version of the paper according to the requirements.
Literature Review

1. Principle of Sovereign Equality

Sovereign equality is the most fundamental principle among principles in international law, and one of the important guiding ideologies of international economic law. According to a well-known American scholar, Lowenfeld, the meaning of the concept of sovereign equality is "that all countries should be equal status without any discrimination in economic activities.". More importantly, in international economic considerations, no country should claim an overlord position or urge its will over the others. It is further indicated by Chinese scholar Zhang Ming, who praises upon the fact of sovereign equality through which "the emergent rule is that all countries, regardless of size, wealth, or power, should have exactly the same rights and responsibilities in economic matters". It is only at this point that all countries will genuinely and enthusiastically take part in the process of world economy by allaying their fears of exploitation or coercion practiced by the strong economies against the weak economies. The celebrated international law expert Brownlie goes to the extent of saying that sovereign equality incorporates within its fold such principles as non-intervention, territorial integrity, and political independence. The Belt and Road engagement for countries will amount to respect for each other's sovereignty, noninterference in each other's internal affairs, and autonomous decisions free from any side pressures. It will also rest on the further argument by Canadian scholar Ruggie that in contemporary fact, sovereign equality is no longer a matter of formal legal equality but equal substantive opportunity in levels of development and policy space. In such a case, the Belt and Road Initiative relates to shared prosperity for countries of various development levels.

2. Mutual Benefit Principle and Win-Win Approach

The Belt and Road, from inception, focuses on mutual benefits and win-win cooperation. British scholar Collins notes that through international economic law, special attention to the balance of the rights and obligations aims to see the balance of interest ultimately achieved. Def, then, economic activity; transactions have to bring benefits to everyone; there can be no losers but only winners. The cooperation will be a two-way benefit and will reflect the concept of shared prosperity. It is through the notion that the participating countries will realize full benefits, take full advantage of the comparative advantages, coordinate the development strategies, and realize mutual benefits by manifold ways for the economic cooperation. From a scholar's perspective in China, Zhang Huiwen believes that win-win greatly contributes to improving the durability and resilience of the cooperation on the Belt and Road; it promotes mutual trust, aligns interests, and forms long-term cooperation amongst involved countries by ensuring that all the parties involved profit from such cooperation. This was further pushed by American scholar Sachs in the relationship he makes between economic development and environmental protection, when he says, "Belt and Road projects must be designed and implemented to produce economic gains with minimal negative environmental impacts."

3. Principle of Sustainable Development

The principle of sustainable development implies the satisfaction of the right to development of present generations without undermining the capacity of the future generations to meet their needs. Rising from the discussions mentioned above, this principle envisions that the Belt and Road cooperation would be expected, to the maximum extent, to be environmentally friendly, resource-efficient, and aimed at ensuring long-term economic and social stability. Further, a Chinese scholar by the name of Li Xiaohua points out that sustainable development in Chongqing means a social, economic, as well as ecological developmental balance other than protection of the latter. The PART of this, which resonates with their incorporation for the Belt and Road Initiative, emphasizes LAST as a priority both in cooperative projects and in policy formulation. For Indian scholar Gupta, sustainable development should mean sharing the burdens—a placement based on a sense of equity, with recognition of differentiated responsibilities between the countries whereby developed economies need to provide greater financial and technological support to allow the developing world to achieve sustainable development. As mentioned by the Brazilian intellectual, Sachs, sustainable development needs to be a development of direction in which human beings can be centered, socially inclusive, and environmentally sustainable rather than simply pursing GDP growth as a first priority. Simply put, the Belt and Road Initiative must be in line with such a transforming agenda so that it may help promote sustainable development meaningfully across the globe.

4. Principle of Openness and Inclusiveness

Openness and inclusiveness, a Chinese academic, Zhou Zhonghai argues, create the ground place w=on which the interaction among various civilizations can learn from, dialogue with each other and integrate with each other in line with the principles of openness and inclusiveness with each other. For the participating nations, respect for diversity, elimination of ideological and institutional blocks, and mutual benefits should be enhanced by increasing the level of communication and coordination. To add on the perspective of Stiglitz, he also relates that the opening up to stakeholders involved in businesses, civil societies, and the communities in which they operate should also be inclusive. This is the reason all the stakeholders, with inclusive decision-making, benefit sharing mechanics, and the belt and road, are meant to cater to the interest of all stakeholders.  Hale, the British scholar, also comments that transparency and inclusion require multi-level performance with governance comprising a large number of performers responsible for both formulating and implementing the rules and policies as regards economic activities, with this appropriately taken into consideration for the sake of the overall interest of different stakeholders, contributing to pulling off the improvement of legitimacy of the Belt as well as Road initiative.

5. Doctrine of Good Faith

Good faith is also a principle in international economic law. Such a view is supported by Chinese scholar Zhao Yun, who thinks that goodwill towards other partners in Belt and Road cooperation requires good faith to perform testamentary commitments and be true to their words. It requires honesty, justice, and legality in economic activities and agreements. As explained by the French expert Dupuy, the stability and predictability in international economic relations are underlined by good faith, which ensures, among other things, that the parties do not abuse their rights, that they interpret the contracts reasonably, and avoid actions which, on the face of it, defeat the very end of the agreement. Under the cooperation framework of the Belt and Road, with the principle of good faith, mutual trust will be increased without doubt, and on that basis, disputes will be easily resolved and projects will smoothly be carried out. In furtherance of the process of cooperation, it also enhances commitment to a rules-based international economic order.

6. Transparency Principle

Transparency is one of the single-most relevant factors to Belt and Road cooperation. According to Chinese scholar Wang Li, this factor means that "the decision-making processes in economic activities have to be opened and responsible. It requires that the participating countries increase information disclosure, stakeholder participation, as well as public and media supervision." On his part, the Canadian scholar Howse holds that this variable is very important to promote the legitimacy of the accountability of international economic governance. It would be in a position to avoid corruption and secure interest of affected communities, distribute costs and benefits of the economic cooperation on a reasonable basis; With relevance to the specific Belt and Road initiative:  Transparency can make the cooperation more credible by raising its legitimacy, offering more predictable rules and procedures, and more accessible information to all the stakeholder entities. It can also perform trust and cooperation among countries at a higher level.
The all-around application of those principles in Belt and Road cooperation will bring participating countries sound legal grounds for practical guide to achieving common development. At the same time, however, it is confronted with certain challenges when turning those principles into practice.

Specific Application of the Basic Principles of International Economic Law under the Belt and Road Initiative
One of the most important national development strategies for China is the Belt and Road Initiative, fundamentally aligned with International Economic Law. At a closer look, it draws on board principles such as fairness and justice, mutual benefit, and sustainable development, which, in fact, are embodied and applied within this particular framework.

Principle of Fairness

what in international economic law is labelled fairness of rights and duties, equal opportunities for development finds its continuation in BRI's stipulation of the system of equal rights, duties and development opportunities as the basis for increasing infrastructural connectivity and expanding economic co-operation.
One of the fundamental goals of the BRI is to make development in the participating countries balanced and inclusive. Focus on the cross-border infrastructures, like the railways, ports, and telecommunications networks, shall provide the advanced and the developing economies along the Belt and Road corridors with equal economic opportunities, thus reducing the disparity and bringing a more balanced sharing of fruits of the cooperation among all partners.
What is more, "win-win cooperation" and "shared growth" reflect fair operations in BRI. In this initiative, project selection, implementation, and dispute resolution mechanism is subjects to representation regarding the interests of participating countries-not just a single party. This helps in giving the sense of mutual ownership, as well as an interest in BRI's success.

Principle of Justice

Justice in international economic law refers to the equitable and nondiscriminatory application of its rules and regulations and also the effective mechanism of disputes resolutions. The BRI has shown great passion in strengthening the rule of law besides transparency of operations.
Another integral part of the BRI-lubricated investment is in developing some of the legal and regulatory frameworks that should help guide cross-border economic activities. There is harmonization in participating countries' related laws, regulations, and standards, a dispute resolution mechanism for disputes that may arise-ct a rules-based approach to economic cooperation where the rights and obligations of all parties will be upheld in a fair and predictable manner.
There is also a very great emphasis on transparency in the planning, tendering, and implementation of projects. Transparency along with stakeholder engagement and accountability measures gives a sense to the participants that the decision-making processes and distribution of benefits are fair and equitable for everybody.

Principle of Mutual Benefit

One of the cornerstones of international economic law, mutual benefit, is a point stressed more than any other in the concept of win-win outcomes through economic cooperation. The BRI stands on solid ground with this principle.
It aims at infrastructure development, trade facilitation, and financial integration in such a way that economic linkage, interdependence, and mutual gains are created between all participating countries. By enhancing connectivity and reducing barriers to cross-border economic activities, the BRI creates new opportunities for trade, investment, and economic growth that directly benefit all concerned.
At the same time, that "joint consultation, joint construction, and joint sharing" approach of the BRI is determined to have the benefits of co-op shared equitably. It builds shared ownership as well as mutual stake in its success by pursuing a collaborative approach that stresses interests as much as concerns of all participating countries.

Principle of Sustainable Development

Sustainable development is also an important principle of international economic law. It states the need to balance economic development with environmental protection and social welfare. The BRI has taken different avenues to show its adherence to this principle in terms of implementation.
Predictably, the initiative places direct backing on green and low-carbon development in a way of direct support for the renewable energy and environmental protection projects. In so doing, surely, the initiative demonstrates an understanding of the need for sustainable growth. Thirdly, the development of better infrastructure, connectivity, and trade facilitation are developed as other major areas of this initiative through which economic development can obtain an environmentally responsible, socially inclusive direction.
Also included in the BRI are activities that concern stakeholder engagement and community development, thus protecting the interests of the locals. Accordingly, the economic gains will not come at the expense of social and environmental sustainability.

Exploring why the Belt and Road Initiative can better implement the fundamental principles of international economic law:
The Belt and Road Initiative is an ambitious project on infrastructure development and investment, constituting an all-important platform for the promotion of connectivity and cooperation between China and the overwhelming majority of countries in Asia, Europe, Africa, and other parts of the world. In the future, there are lots of aspects to which the BRI should pay more attention during the process of implementation for, in the end, this initiative could better match the basic principles of international economic law.

1. Transparency and Accountability

BRI projects have to transparently adopt recognized procurement, bidding, and contracting procedures right from the beginning to aptly meet the standards of the international community. The monitoring and evaluation mechanisms should be well laid out to analyze completely economic, social, and environmental impacts of such initiatives. The participating countries need to make efforts to strengthen domestic institutions and governance frameworks for enhanced accountability. They will be of a higher quality and more effective, have increased transparency and widespread accountability, and be taken seriously with more significant trust and participation from all the stakeholders.

2. Non-discrimination and Equal Treatment

It has to observe the principle of non-discrimination so that any investor or company from all countries can participate on equal terms with no form of discrimination or give any company preferential treatment due to its nationality. A peripheral concept such as this would create a level playing field in a sort of fair competition environment where equal opportunities are afforded each and every participant. There are to be no practices acted upon at all that may translate to market distortions or even monopolistic practices. Not only is this going to make all the concerned parties excited about the principle of equal treatment, but it is also going to optimize resource allocation, set mutual benefits, and attain results of win-win.

3. Sustainable Development

BRI projects shall comply with the United Nations' Sustainable Development Goals. This is for it to provide mixed and balanced economic development that shall be sustainable. Detailed environmental as well as social impacts assessment, comprehensive in nature, ought to be undertaken prior to the execution of a project. Proper mitigation measures have to be effected. Transfer of green technologies and best practices have to be encouraged, hence promoting low carbon and climate-resilient development. Through sustainable development, BRI projects may be of permanent advantage, enabling man to coexist with nature, which would be more significant for coming generations with wealthy resources at their disposal.

4. Defense of Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity

The BRI projects should protect the sovereignty, as well as the territorial scope of the concerned countries, to the fullest extent, so that the activities do not create a feeling of intervening in internal affairs or negatively affecting political or economic independence. It is not just about question of concerns and needs but shall be effectively addressed through appropriate communications and broad-ranging consultations with local communities and stakeholders. Further, with political support, much less social recognition coming from the involved country, Olivia of the BRI simply cannot go very far. In this context, therefore, respect for sovereignty forms the very base on which good relations and mutual trust between all parties have to be based.

5. Dispute Settlement and Rule of Law

A good dispute-settling mechanism guarantees that the disputes entailing BRI projects are settled fairly and promptly. It encourages international arbitration as well as other alternative ways to provide effectiveness in the handling of disputes. The rule of law could thereby be guaranteed in those countries with improvements made to their legal and judicial systems, therefore ensuring that the rights and interests of the investors are equally protected. A solidly set up dispute resolution mechanism and an environment of the rule of law can bring stable and more foreseeable institutional guarantees to BRI projects, thus lifting the confidence of all parties in cooperation for mutual benefit.
Therefore, it can only be successfully carried out as open and inclusive international cooperation with the efforts of all parties combined. It is in this very way and with these principles that the BRI can help build up an international economic order that is more pluralistic, more sustainable and more based on the rule of law. So, indeed, it does need the positive efforts of China, the people, as well as other countries and international organizations and civil societies to hold hands in order to solve problems, share opportunities, as well as attain common development and prosperity.
It is off without a value pursuit into the current global economic governance system guided by common interests of mankind is not adapting itself against the new changes that are taking place in economic globalization, it is unable to deal with the present crisis of international economic law and governance. The very meaning of the WTO-being the only form of a multilateral trading system developed after the Second World War-is transformed into a totally compromised arrangement with all major imbalances in international financial law governance, giving threat to the very foundation of global economic governance system and, in turn, putting global political stability and world peace at stake. This is but a question of a new edition of multipolar global economic governance in BRI in a new respect with respect to design and construction. However, as compared to the others, BRI is the stage of leadership with regard to the richness and construction of the essence of global economic governance and forms new practices of international multi-side governance. The principles enumerated above in that manner take their stand on multilateralism, shared responsibilities, investment and financial leadership, fairness, and justice to enlighten the renovating of international economic governance in keeping, developing, and resolving with the most essential systems and complex challenges for that matter. To that effect, among the cornerstones safeguarding economic globalization, international economic law must embrace the new and innovative intellectual concepts of BRI. It will, thus, play a very important foundational role in building up the multilateral system for the emergence of new forces that will be injected into the process of global economic globalization reformulated for substantial justice. That is, over the past few years, the COVID-19 pandemic has made tremendous impacts on international trade aspects, those of personnel exchanges as well as in the process of readjusting commodity prices. And it went further to criticize China's development and technological monopolies established from outside of this negative competition by the United States and some other Western countries. For its part, China too has remained strategically focused on its goals and resolutely committed to high-quality development of the BRI. The vivid characteristics of the BRI are in the policy communication, infrastructure connectivity, unimpeded trade, and positive progress appearing on the financial plate. Thus, in the age after the pandemic, as the trend of economic globalisation persists in pushing the affected countries forward, the construction level of the BRI should be high, high-efficiency, high-quality, and resilient within the framework of international economic law so that more contributions could be made to world peace and economic development.

Conclusion
This literature review describes the process of adaption and adoption of the fundamental principles of international economic law within the Chinese 'Belt and Road.' Its final analysis suggests a very close alignment between this very important national development strategy, on one hand, with the core principles guiding the global economic order on the other.
The review reveals that fairness, justice, mutual benefit, and sustainable development, among others, are particularly deeply impregnated in the design and implementation of the BRI. It pays great emphasis on the promotion of balanced and inclusive growth in the initiative through the pursuit of increased access to economic opportunities for all the participating countries where economies have become imbalanced. It is oriented to justice, due to the strengthened rules and regulations, increasing transparency, creating a predictable and fair atmosphere of economic cooperation.
BRI's inclination towards "win-win cooperation" is a means of developing economic interdependencies through which mutual benefit and shared prosperity accrue. Moreover, bringing on board elements of sustainable development in the form of green growth and community take-on board ensures this initiative will comply with the principles of sustainable development in international economic law.
This deepens our understanding of the interaction between national development strategies and principles of a global economic order. From the above analysis on how the BRI has been made on a deliberate attempt by China to align its expansive vision with international economic law tenets in a bid to create a more inclusive model of cooperation.
Looking Ahead The outcomes of this study will find expression not only in further scholarship but also serve to inform future policy choices. For instance, scholars can examine which elements of international economic law are already being realized or are part of the new international endeavors, the most likely complications ahead, and the alterations that would be necessary in order to establish concurrence between the national agenda and principles of international economic governance. This outcome can therefore be used by policy-makers and BRI stakeholders to make the initiative even better since it would have been anchored towards the grassroots basics of international economic law to overall emphasize shared prosperity and better sustainable development at a global level.