Assistant: 
User: System: Assume that you are an IELTS evaluator.
Given the question prompt and answer, you give the IELTS score like how humans evaluate, 
on Task achievement is stricted based on question other wise reduce marks
, Coherence and cohesion, Lexical resource, Grammatical range and accuracy and provide average of all criteria as the overall grade.
do not provide a range in score
you will provide 150 words remarks for each criteria
Provide the score in a floating point representation with 1 decimal. 


for task achievement:
    ['This criterion should be strictly based on how well the candidate has addressed the given prompt. You should reduce marks if the answer is irrelevant to the question. You can use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the task achievement.
    Address all parts of the task
    Fully answer the question
    Present a clear position or viewpoint
    Develop ideas coherently and logically
    Provide relevant examples and evidence
    Use appropriate register and tone
    Write the required number of words
    Maintain focus on the topic
    Avoid repetition of ideas or language
    Conclude effectively
    ']
for coherence and cohesion
    ['This criterion should focus on how well the candidate has organized their thoughts and ideas in a logical and coherent manner. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the coherence and cohesion.
    Use a range of cohesive devices (e.g., conjunctions, linking words, pronouns)
    Use paragraphs effectively to organize ideas
    Use appropriate sequencing of ideas
    Use appropriate referencing and substitution
    Use appropriate signposting language (e.g., firstly, in conclusion)
    Maintain a clear central theme
    Ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence
    Use consistent and appropriate verb tenses
    Use a variety of sentence structures
    Avoid irrelevant or off-topic information
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.']
for lexical resource:
   [' This criterion should evaluate the candidate's vocabulary and their ability to use a range of words and phrases effectively. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the lexical resource.
    Use a range of vocabulary and collocations
    Use precise and accurate vocabulary
    Use academic vocabulary appropriately
    Use synonyms and paraphrasing effectively
    Avoid overuse of simple or repetitive vocabulary
    Use idiomatic language appropriately
    Use appropriate register and tone
    Use words in their correct form and spelling
    Use appropriate word families and word forms
    Use appropriate cultural references and idioms
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.']
for Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
    ['This criterion should evaluate the candidate's ability to use a range of grammatical structures accurately. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the grammatical range and accuracy.
    Use a range of sentence structures (simple, complex, compound)
    Use appropriate verb tenses and forms
    Use appropriate subject-verb agreement
    Use appropriate articles and determiners
    Use appropriate pronouns and antecedents
    Use appropriate prepositions and adverbial phrases
    Use appropriate modals and conditionals
    Use appropriate passive and active voice
    Use appropriate punctuation
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.
    Avoid grammatical errors such as sentence fragments or run-on sentences']

for overall grade:
    ['You should provide the aberage of all other criteria as the overall grade,
    If word count is less than 100, then reduce the mark should be in the range of 4-5
    You should provide the average of all criteria as the overall grade, using a floating-point representation with 1 decimal. If the essay is well-structured, you should increase all scores and give a better grade. If all criteria have been met, you should give a better overall score. However, if the word count is less than 150, you should drastically reduce the marks.']

User: hi, who are you
Assistant: Hello! I'm an AI assistant, here to help with a wide range of tasks. I can assist with:

* **Analysis**: Break down complex topics into smaller, more manageable parts
* **Question answering**: Provide answers to your questions on various subjects
* **Math**: Help with math problems, from simple calculations to advanced equations
* **Coding**: Assist with coding tasks, including writing code in various programming languages
* **Creative writing**: Generate creative content, from short stories to poetry
* **Teaching**: Explain concepts and ideas in a clear, concise manner
* **Role-play**: Engage in role-playing scenarios to practice social skills or explore fictional situations
* **General discussion**: Chat about news, current events, or any topic that interests you

I'm happy to help with any of these tasks, or anything else you might need assistance with. What's on your mind today?
User: Assume that you are an IELTS evaluator.
Given the question prompt and answer, you give the IELTS score like how humans evaluate, 
on Task achievement is stricted based on question other wise reduce marks
, Coherence and cohesion, Lexical resource, Grammatical range and accuracy and provide average of all criteria as the overall grade.
do not provide a range in score
you will provide 150 words remarks for each criteria
Provide the score in a floating point representation with 1 decimal. 


for task achievement:
    ['This criterion should be strictly based on how well the candidate has addressed the given prompt. You should reduce marks if the answer is irrelevant to the question. You can use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the task achievement.
    Address all parts of the task
    Fully answer the question
    Present a clear position or viewpoint
    Develop ideas coherently and logically
    Provide relevant examples and evidence
    Use appropriate register and tone
    Write the required number of words
    Maintain focus on the topic
    Avoid repetition of ideas or language
    Conclude effectively
    ']
for coherence and cohesion
    ['This criterion should focus on how well the candidate has organized their thoughts and ideas in a logical and coherent manner. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the coherence and cohesion.
    Use a range of cohesive devices (e.g., conjunctions, linking words, pronouns)
    Use paragraphs effectively to organize ideas
    Use appropriate sequencing of ideas
    Use appropriate referencing and substitution
    Use appropriate signposting language (e.g., firstly, in conclusion)
    Maintain a clear central theme
    Ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence
    Use consistent and appropriate verb tenses
    Use a variety of sentence structures
    Avoid irrelevant or off-topic information
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.']
for lexical resource:
   [' This criterion should evaluate the candidate's vocabulary and their ability to use a range of words and phrases effectively. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the lexical resource.
    Use a range of vocabulary and collocations
    Use precise and accurate vocabulary
    Use academic vocabulary appropriately
    Use synonyms and paraphrasing effectively
    Avoid overuse of simple or repetitive vocabulary
    Use idiomatic language appropriately
    Use appropriate register and tone
    Use words in their correct form and spelling
    Use appropriate word families and word forms
    Use appropriate cultural references and idioms
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.']
for Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
    ['This criterion should evaluate the candidate's ability to use a range of grammatical structures accurately. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the grammatical range and accuracy.
    Use a range of sentence structures (simple, complex, compound)
    Use appropriate verb tenses and forms
    Use appropriate subject-verb agreement
    Use appropriate articles and determiners
    Use appropriate pronouns and antecedents
    Use appropriate prepositions and adverbial phrases
    Use appropriate modals and conditionals
    Use appropriate passive and active voice
    Use appropriate punctuation
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.
    Avoid grammatical errors such as sentence fragments or run-on sentences']

for overall grade:
    ['You should provide the aberage of all other criteria as the overall grade,
    If word count is less than 100, then reduce the mark should be in the range of 4-5
    You should provide the average of all criteria as the overall grade, using a floating-point representation with 1 decimal. If the essay is well-structured, you should increase all scores and give a better grade. If all criteria have been met, you should give a better overall score. However, if the word count is less than 150, you should drastically reduce the marks.']

User: Assume that you are an IELTS evaluator.
Given the question prompt and answer, you give the IELTS score like how humans evaluate, 
on Task achievement is stricted based on question other wise reduce marks
, Coherence and cohesion, Lexical resource, Grammatical range and accuracy and provide average of all criteria as the overall grade.
do not provide a range in score
you will provide 150 words remarks for each criteria
Provide the score in a floating point representation with 1 decimal. 


for task achievement:
    ['This criterion should be strictly based on how well the candidate has addressed the given prompt. You should reduce marks if the answer is irrelevant to the question. You can use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the task achievement.
    Address all parts of the task
    Fully answer the question
    Present a clear position or viewpoint
    Develop ideas coherently and logically
    Provide relevant examples and evidence
    Use appropriate register and tone
    Write the required number of words
    Maintain focus on the topic
    Avoid repetition of ideas or language
    Conclude effectively
    ']
for coherence and cohesion
    ['This criterion should focus on how well the candidate has organized their thoughts and ideas in a logical and coherent manner. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the coherence and cohesion.
    Use a range of cohesive devices (e.g., conjunctions, linking words, pronouns)
    Use paragraphs effectively to organize ideas
    Use appropriate sequencing of ideas
    Use appropriate referencing and substitution
    Use appropriate signposting language (e.g., firstly, in conclusion)
    Maintain a clear central theme
    Ensure each paragraph has a clear topic sentence
    Use consistent and appropriate verb tenses
    Use a variety of sentence structures
    Avoid irrelevant or off-topic information
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.']
for lexical resource:
   [' This criterion should evaluate the candidate's vocabulary and their ability to use a range of words and phrases effectively. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the lexical resource.
    Use a range of vocabulary and collocations
    Use precise and accurate vocabulary
    Use academic vocabulary appropriately
    Use synonyms and paraphrasing effectively
    Avoid overuse of simple or repetitive vocabulary
    Use idiomatic language appropriately
    Use appropriate register and tone
    Use words in their correct form and spelling
    Use appropriate word families and word forms
    Use appropriate cultural references and idioms
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.']
for Grammatical Range and Accuracy:
    ['This criterion should evaluate the candidate's ability to use a range of grammatical structures accurately. You should provide 150 words remarks for this criterion and use a scale of 0 to 9 to evaluate the grammatical range and accuracy.
    Use a range of sentence structures (simple, complex, compound)
    Use appropriate verb tenses and forms
    Use appropriate subject-verb agreement
    Use appropriate articles and determiners
    Use appropriate pronouns and antecedents
    Use appropriate prepositions and adverbial phrases
    Use appropriate modals and conditionals
    Use appropriate passive and active voice
    Use appropriate punctuation
    However, if the word count of the total passage is less than 100, you should drastically reduce the marks.
    Avoid grammatical errors such as sentence fragments or run-on sentences']

for overall grade:
    ['You should provide the aberage of all other criteria as the overall grade,
    If word count is less than 100, then reduce the mark should be in the range of 4-5
    You should provide the average of all criteria as the overall grade, using a floating-point representation with 1 decimal. If the essay is well-structured, you should increase all scores and give a better grade. If all criteria have been met, you should give a better overall score. However, if the word count is less than 150, you should drastically reduce the marks.']

Assistant: To provide an accurate evaluation based on the criteria and methodology outlined, I need the specific question prompt and the candidate's answer. The detailed evaluation requires concrete input to assign scores based on task achievement, coherence and cohesion, lexical resource, and grammatical range and accuracy.

Once you share the candidate's response and the question prompt, I will be able to:

1. Assess whether the candidate has fully addressed the question asked (task achievement).
2. Evaluate how logically and coherently the ideas are organized and connected (coherence and cohesion).
3. Examine the variety and appropriateness of the vocabulary used (lexical resource).
4. Analyze the accuracy and range of grammatical structures (grammatical range and accuracy).
5. Calculate the overall grade based on the average of these criteria, considering any specific adjustments related to the response's word count and structure.

Please provide the candidate's response and the corresponding question prompt for a detailed evaluation and score assignment.

User: task 1
The table illustrates the things unemployed spent time on last year in UK.
Overall, people prefer handling stuff in morning rather than afternoon, such as doing housework, shopping and job hunting. Whatsmore, the choice is different in some fields by gender.
On the one hand, 68% of unemployed intent to do housework in morning, much higher than that in the afternoon, with only 28%. Shopping is another similar circumstance, 20% declined in the afternoon compare with 46% on first half of day. However, there is a exception, both men and women tend to watch TV in the afternoon, with 10% increasing along the day.
On the other hand, some arrangements are varied between men and women. 49% of women spent time on housework, while only 19% men interested in that. Opposite with housework, men showed more passion than women in gardening, 27% versus 5% in a whole day. At the same time, job hunting and sitting around have little difference in gender, separately within 6% and 3%.
Assistant: ### Evaluation:

**Task Achievement: 6.0**
The candidate addresses the general topic of how unemployed people in the UK spent their time last year, distinguishing between activities preferred in the morning versus the afternoon and differences between gender. However, the response lacks overall clarity in presenting precise data comparison. Some statistical details mentioned do not relate directly to the task's requirement to discuss the table effectively. The emphasis on time slots is appropriate, but a lack of clarity in summarizing and comparing critical data lowers the score.

**Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5**
The structure of the essay shows a basic logical flow, distinguishing between morning activities and gender differences. However, the transitions between ideas are sometimes abrupt, and the linking phrases like "Whatsmore" and "On the one hand" are used awkwardly. The use of paragraphs is clear, but better cohesion could be achieved by smoother transitions and a clearer linkage between the data presented and the tasks outlined in the table.

**Lexical Resource: 6.0**
The use of vocabulary is adequate with terms like "intent", "declined", and "varied" appropriately used. Some phrases and word choices are awkward or incorrect ("intent" should be "intend", "Whatsmore" is unconventional). There is a limited range of vocabulary to describe statistical data, and some repetition of words like "morning" and "afternoon" could be replaced with synonyms to enhance lexical range.

**Grammatical Range and Accuracy: 5.5**
The response includes a mix of complex and simple sentences. There are several grammatical errors ("68% of unemployed intent to do housework" should be "intend", "separately within 6% and 3%" is unclear and should be rephrased for clarity). These mistakes hinder the clarity and accuracy of the response. Punctuation is generally handled well, but sentence structure issues detract from the overall grammatical quality.

### Overall Remarks:
The response provides a basic analysis of the table's data concerning unemployed peoples' time utilization in the UK, categorized by time of day and gender differences. Although it captures fundamental distinctions, it struggles with clarity in data presentation and accuracy in language use. The essay would benefit from fewer grammatical errors, a better range of vocabulary concerning data description, and improved logical sequencing of ideas for higher coherence. The overall grade reflects these areas of strength and needed improvements.

**Overall Grade: 6.0**
User: task1
The line graph shows the percentage of people who live in cities in four Asian nations between 1970 and 2020, and predicts the data in 2030 and 2040.
Overall, population in all four countires have increased more or few comparing with 50 years ago and the growing trend will be continued until 20 years later at least.
In 1970s, urban citizens in Thailand and Indonesia are under one fifth of total number, while the data are little bit higher in Philippines and Malaysia, around 30%. After 50 years development, population in cities of Malaysia have reached over 80%, which is the highest among the four. As Indonesia, which is the least one, raised rapidly over years and surpassed Philippines and Thailand after 2010.
With the prediction, the proportion of urban citizens will continuously increase  after 2020, and Malaysia will keep it leading position. The urban population  of all four countries will exceed a half amount in 2040.
Assistant:
Assistant: