Rewrite the entire texty below, mention everything in great detail, be very precise:

''welcome back everyone how many times have we heard about the miraculous quran this claim takes various forms but what i want to focus on in this video is the argument from muslim apologists that the quran itself by reading it in arabic or hearing it recited testifies to its own divine origin here are some examples the quran has been looked at as the ultimate miracle by muslim scholars from the very beginning some of those angles at the most common angle is the most difficult to explain in english why because the idea is that the quran is miraculous in terms of its language something in the way allah speaks something in the way that he communicates his message is is so profound and incredible that it can't even be translated the quantity and the quality of this miracle is so magnificent that all of the other miracles are trivial compared to it so the miracle that is the mother of all miracles the miracle that eclipses all other miracles the miracle that is the definitive miracle is the miracle of the quran therefore there is no question that the quran is the ultimate miracle let me just mention very quickly six or seven things that make the quran miraculous the most obvious of them and the most self-evident and the one that the quraish understood immediately was the language and the style the rhetoric and the eloquence of the quran go look at the seven poems go look at pre-islamic poetry go look at all types of what is called nathr and rhythm and rhyme of pre-islam and post-islam the genre of the quran the style of the quran the eloquence of the quran is something that no human has even come close to it truly is timeless and that is why when the greatest poets of quraysh heard it when the greatest poets of arabia heard it they didn't know what to do they were mesmerized it is mentioned in the quran multiple instances of the seerah allah azzawajal mentions al-waleed for example ebin what he did when he heard the quran abu jahl the enemy of islam at night he would go stand outside the house of the prophet sam to listen to the quran being recited the audience's response to the miraculous quran is recorded in the quran he says when they heard it they didn't know what to do when the greatest poets of quraysh heard it when the greatest poets of arabia heard it they didn't know what to do they were mesmerized it's interesting that he says the amazed response of the people is mentioned in the quran and seerah but quickly launches into examples of the latter let's explore why that might be the case starting with constructing an irrefutable argument using muslim logic first the quran's recitation compels people to believe in its divine origin second let's also posit that the recitation could not possibly be any better than when it was uttered from the lips of the prophet of islam himself third let's assume that the quran is accurate in the events it reports it follows from this that nowhere in the history of islam should the recitation of the quran be more compelling than for its original audience muhammad's contemporaries the quran should therefore easily validate these claims by muslim apologists so let's turn to the quran and see what it says about the response of its original audience there are lots of verses here i'll abbreviate and summarize but feel free to look them up yourself also there are some of them who listen to you and disbelieve and say this is nothing but old tales when our signs are recited to them they say we have already heard this this is nothing but old tales if we wished we could indeed say something like this this is nothing but old tales there are some who hurt the prophet and say he is all ears they make a good point when it is said to them what has your lord sent down they say old tales we have been promised this before we and our fathers this is nothing but old tales those who disbelieve say certainly we have been promised this before this is nothing but old tales but the one who says to his parents enough of both of you do you promise me that i shall be brought forth when generations have already passed away before me he says this is nothing but old tales when our signs are recited to him he says old tales and once again when our signs are recited to him he says old tales additionally we find that the quran's reciter was thought to have a human teacher not divine certainly we know that they say only a human being teaches him those who disbelieve say this is nothing but a lie he has forged it and other people have helped him with it the hearers of the quran are therefore explicitly contradicting the notion that the god of the quran reveals what humans do not know as surah 96 says he who teaches by the pen teaches the humans what he does not know on the contrary the people hearing the quran being recited are claiming that they have prior knowledge of the supposed divine revelations the quran also affirms that many people will not believe even after hearing its recitation rather painful punishment will be required as indeed ascending down from the lord of the worlds in a clear arabic language they will not believe in it until they see the painful punishment so in the human realm people are definitely unimpressed with the quran and its messenger over and over the quran's audience is surprised at the mere plain warner with a very familiar message resembling ancient legends and of course in typical quran fashion every messenger is the same and the people react the same with an almost suspicious robot-like predictability what prevented the people from believing when the guidance came to them except that they said has god raised up a human being as a messenger and you can compare with many other verses i have listed there for something similar the quran itself therefore does not claim to amaze people who hear its recitation what the quran relies on very frequently for its credibility is that the quran claims to agree with and confirm the scriptures that came before it i could cite verses to demonstrate this until your ears bleed but here are just a few examples surah 26 surely it is indeed ascending down for the lord of the worlds surely it is indeed in the scriptures of those of old and surah 5 we've sent down a book with truth confirming what was with him of the book and as a preserver of it notice especially surah 37 when it was said to them there is no god but god they became arrogant and said are we to abandon our gods for a possessed poet no he has brought the truth and confirmed the messengers notice that the basis for the quran's authority confirming the messengers has been completely abandoned today by muslim apologists although the jewish and christian scriptures are now as they were in the seventh century and many centuries before but of course muslims can no longer claim that the quran agrees with the books of the jews and christians therefore this proof of the quran's divine origin has been discarded in favor of the self-attesting miraculous nature of the quran but some of you will know that there are a couple of verses which portray belief as a result of hearing the quran recited remember when we turned a band of jen to you to listen to the quran when they were in its presence they said be silent and when it was finished they turned back to their people as warners they said our people surely we have heard a book which has been sent down after moses confirming what was before it guiding to the truth and to a straight road and from surah 72 say i am inspired that a band of gen listened and they said surely we have heard an amazing quran it guides to the right course we believe in it and we shall not associate anyone with our lord but note that in the first case what compelled belief was that the quran confirmed what came before it as we've noted before this motif is a frequent claim of the quran's authenticity in surah 72 several verses describe the speech of jinn again the first part of the verse say i am inspired that a band of jinn listened and they said and this quote continues for several verses this verse does not say that the jinn heard the quran from the quran's messenger muslim commentators simply assume this based on the parallel in surah 46 but in surah 46 again the proof of the quran's authenticity is that it confirms what was sent before it second this claim is completely unfalsifiable anyone can say that they were inspired with knowledge of something that happened in the supernatural realm however viewers may conclude that such claims require more credibility than the quran's author deserves to warrant belief third sura72 contains lengthy quotes from the jinn citations in the quran such as these exclude them from being miraculous in their literary quality since the miraculous revelation of allah would need to be distinguishable from the speech of jen or any other created being ironically then this single passage which affirms the amazing quran cannot itself be a literary miracle and is not therefore self-attesting but can't we compare it to pre-islamic poetry to see the miraculous nature of the quran absolutely go look at the seven poems go look at pre-islamic poetry go look at all types of what is called nather and rhythm and rhyme of pre-islam and post-islam actually no we can't dr aiman ibrahim comments while muslims tend to defend the beauty of the arabic quran by mentioning pre-islamic poetry as evidence there is no evidence of the acclaimed pre-islamic poetry not even a single line remains all we know about pre-islamic poetry comes from the muslim sources written centuries after muhammad that tell us there was magnificent poetry before islam the fact that these muslim sources cite poems and state they were from pre-islamic arabs does not prove the poem's origins it is possible that the writers of these sources in an attempt to elevate the quran and its language forged some poetry and labeled it pre-islamic in order to claim superiority even the renowned muslim thinker taha hussain postulated that the so-called pre-islamic poetry was forgery and not pre-islamic he claimed that this poetry was forged by muslims themselves to authenticate quranic assertions and establish credibility ibrahim continues and this is worth quoting at length notice that surah 72 which we talked about earlier is also mentioned in fact many scholars argue that the language of the quran is imperfect the quran underwent interpolation that complicated the flow of the text at times the text appears to be made up of unrelated passages not to mention the various places where it needs inundations due to scribal errors not only non-muslim scholars and thinkers but also some modern arab muslims view the qur'an's language as flawed some even doubt certain chapters of the quran calling them inauthentic revelations for example the iraqi muslim intellectual ahmad hassan al-kubanji calls for a version of islam that makes sense supports human rights and improves the morality of humankind he dismisses any so-called islamic teachings or concepts even passages from the quran that contradict these values in his examination of surah 55 he argues that the chapter is ineloquent and full of contradictions he claims that the chapter insults allah's intellect as it is full of literary mistakes and linguistic errors and lacks any logical sequence as he sees it when muslims claim that this chapter is divinely inspired they are not doing islam any favors khalil abdal karim an egyptian muslim lawyer made the case that some quranic verses were included merely to meet the personal needs and lustful desires of muhammad and his companions he makes a good point the above mentioned hussein argued that the language of the quran is difficult to follow and questioned the validity and truthfulness of some chapters especially surah 72 which of course we discussed earlier and now let's summarize the original audience who heard the quran recited right from muhammad dismissed it as old legends the quran does not report people being amazed with its literary quality the original audience thought the quran's reciter had a human teacher not divine the quran also affirms that many will not believe even after hearing the quran it is therefore unconvinced of its own miraculousness the quran frequently bases its authority and proof not on a literary miracle but on its confirmation of prior scriptures of the jews and christians which it doesn't actually confirm ironically a single claim to the amazing qur'an the gen in sur 72 is impossible to prove vague and cannot be self-attesting in its literary quality some muslim scholars have raised similar questions to the ones in this video including with surah 72 specifically returning now to our three propositions if we are to take the quran as accurate per number three then number one the compelling power of the quran's recitation is not defensible from the quran itself the quran's hearers call it repeatedly old legends this is in spite of number two that muhammad was the best reciter ever all of this raises a question or two or three if contemporaries of muhammad weren't convinced hearing him how could muslims expect us to be when they recite the quran number two does the miraculous quran sound like a later development by muslim apologists or does it sound like something attested to by the qur'an itself and number three why have muslims dropped the quran's own claims for authenticity that it confirms what came before it's hard to know where to stop for example if we were to look at a historical argument the quran's dozens upon dozens of variant readings were not sifted through according to their miraculous quality they were judged on the basis of grammar vocabulary and popularity this is pain staking work and apparently some of these major scholars in the formative period of the qurans really had no clue what they were doing they should have just listened to the cornucopia of variant recitations and let their miraculous quality speak for itself unless of course all that wasn't actually a thing until much later a final note the challenge verses of the quran apparently didn't mean much to the original audience either why try to produce something that sounds just like old legends you've heard before what a waste of time as surah 8 31 says when our signs are recited to them they say we have already heard this if we wished we could indeed say something like this this is nothing but old tales you're also welcome to check out this video for more on the challenge versus different opinions on what the challenge actually means and why the challenge itself is incoherent one final note this video was so good that i was inspired with knowledge there was a group of jinn who listened to it and were so convinced by the literary quality of the script that they left islam don't believe me try to prove me wrong thanks so much for watching i'll see you next time