You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Photochemotherapy, or photodynamic therapy (PDT) as it is also known, is a technique for the treatment of various abnormalities or disorders of the skin—or other epithelial organs or mucosa, especially cancers or pre-cancerous lesions, as well as certain non-malignant lesions for example skin complaints such as psoriasis. Photochemotherapy involves the application of photosensitizing (photochemotherapeutic) agents to the affected area of the body, followed by exposure to photoactivating light in order to activate the photosensitizing agents and convert them into cytotoxic form, whereby the affected cells are killed or their proliferative potential diminished.
A range of photosensitizing agents are known, including notably the psoralens, the porphyrins, the chlorins and the phthalocyanins. Such drugs become toxic when exposed to light.
Photosensitizing drugs may exert their effects by a variety of mechanisms, directly or indirectly. Thus for example, certain photosensitizers become directly toxic when activated by light, whereas others act to generate toxic species, e.g. oxidizing agents such as singlet oxygen or other oxygen-derived free radicals, which are extremely destructive to cellular material and biomolecules such as lipids, proteins and nucleic acids. Psoralens are an example of directly acting photosensitizers; upon exposure to light they form adducts and cross-links between the two strands of DNA molecules, thereby inhibiting DNA synthesis. The unfortunate drawback of this therapy is that unwanted mutagenic and carcinogenic side effects may occur.
This disadvantage may be avoided by selecting photosensitizers with an alternative, indirect mode of action. For example porphyrins, which act indirectly by generation of toxic oxygen species, have no mutagenic side effects and represent more favourable candidates for photochemotherapy. Porphyrins are naturally occurring tetrapyrroles that are precursors in the synthesis of heme. In particular, heme is produced when iron (Fe3+) is incorporated in protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) by the action of the enzyme ferrochelatase. PpIX is an extremely potent photosensitizer, whereas heme has no photosensitizing effect.
One such porphyrin-based drug, Photofrin, has been approved as a photosensitizer in the therapy of certain cancers. A considerable disadvantage is that since it must be administered parenterally, generally intravenously, it can cause photosensitization of the skin which may last for several weeks following injection. Photofrin consists of large oligomers of porphyrin and it does not readily penetrate the skin when applied topically. Similar problems exist with other porphyrin-based photosensitizers such as Foscan (temoporfin) or the so-called “hematoporphyrin derivative” (Hpd) which have also been reported for use in cancer photochemotherapy. Hpd is a complex mixture obtained by treating haematoporphyrin with acetic and sulphuric acids, after which the acetylated product is dissolved with alkali. Foscan is a tetrapyrrole derivative with four meta-phenol groups attached, that after intravenous injection leaves the patient hypersensitized up to 3 weeks due to the very slow clearance rate from the body.
To overcome these problems, precursors of PpIX have been investigated for photochemotherapeutic potential. In particular the PpIX precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid (5ALA) has been investigated as a photochemotherapeutic agent for certain skin cancers.
Photodynamic therapy based on topical application of 5-aminolevulinic acid (5ALA) or a derivative thereof, for the treatment of small solid tumors is based on using the body's own biosynthetic route to form the endogenous chromophore protoporfyrin IX (PpIX) [1,2].
In Photodynamic diagnosis (PDD), the strong fluorescence of the chromophore is utilized. Excitation at 400-410 nm yields strong emission in the range 630-640 nm, enabling detection of the tissue in which PpIX is accumulated.
5ALA, which is formed from succinyl CoA and glycine in the first step of heme synthesis, is to a limited extent able to penetrate the skin and lead to a localised build-up of PpIX; since the action of ferrochelatase (the metallating enzyme) is the rate limiting step in heme synthesis, adding an excess amount of exogenous 5ALA (or a derivative thereof) bypasses the natural regulatory mechanisms, and leads to elevated levels of the photosensitizing agent PpIX in the cells, with a notable accumulation in tumorus cells [3,4]. A contributing factor for this is that the final enzyme in heme biosynthesis, ferrochelatase, that incorporates an iron ion into the PpIX ring system, is downregulated in tumor cells, thus leading to enhanced build-up of PpIX levels in cancer cells relative to normal cells.
In PDT, excitation of PpIX at 632 nm is generally used. The singlet excited chromophore undergoes efficient intersystem crossing to the first excited triplet state (T1). In presence of molecular oxygen, the chromophore passes its excitation energy from the T1 state to oxygen, thereby generating highly cytotoxic singlet oxygen. As PpIX is synthesized in the cellular mitocontria, the formed singlet oxygen attacks mitochondrial membranes with high efficiency, thus destroying the cells' capacity to produce energy, whereby the cell in question dies.
By applying 5ALA topically to skin tumors, and then after a few hours exposing the tumors to light, a beneficial photochemotherapeutic effect is obtained (see for example WO91/01727). Since the skin covering basilomas and squamous cell carcinomas is more readily penetrated by 5ALA than healthy skin, and since the concentration of ferrochelatase is low in skin tumors, it has been found that topical application of 5ALA leads to a selectively enhanced production of PpIX in tumors.
Photochemotherapy with 5ALA is not always entirely satisfactory. 5ALA is not able to penetrate all tumors and other tissues with sufficient efficacy to enable treatment of a wide range of tumors or other conditions and 5ALA also tends to be unstable in pharmaceutical formulations. These problems have to a large extent been overcome by the use of straight chain, unsubstituted alkyl 5ALA esters which exhibit improved selectivity for abnormal tissue, non-systemic localization of administered agents, improved uptake and PpIX production, and reduced pain sensation on administration (see WO96/28412).
The concentration of PpIX has been found to reach an optimal therapeutic window 2-4 h after application of 5ALA or derivatives thereof heretofore known and used [2]. The concentration of PpIX decays to normal background levels in 36-48 hours.
Currently, the PDT technique is employed using 5ALA or its methyl or hexyl ester clinically. Also other alkyl esters have been proposed [5].
Alkyl esters of 5ALA, and/or modifications to the amine group, are disclosed in for example U.S. Pat. No. 6,992,107 (family member of WO96/28412).
Recently a class of derivatized 5ALA esters, essentially comprising branched alkyl 5ALA esters and substituted benzyl 5ALA esters were proposed therein, providing advantageous enhanced PDT properties compared to the compounds mentioned above (U.S. Pat. No. 6,992,107; Gierskcky et al).
However, these compounds still exhibit some limitations for use as pharmaceuticals in PDT, e.g. relatively low efficacy of membrane penetration. Such a slow penetration hampers efficient clinical treatment by requiring longer retention times before irradiation, and may negatively influence the acceptance of treatment, both by the patient and the medical profession. Consequently, there exists a need for improved photochemotherapeutic agents.