0:0:0.0 --> 0:0:4.260
Keith Low
It's been so that you can see here you're calling and then you're sharing.
0:0:4.670 --> 0:0:5.560
Keith Low
I'm really calling you.
0:0:5.640 --> 0:0:6.640
Keith Low
Are you share screen share?
0:0:6.650 --> 0:0:7.720
Keith Low
See are you recall that.
0:0:11.970 --> 0:0:13.60
Keith Low
And make sure you are beautiful.
0:0:17.370 --> 0:0:18.170
Keith Low
It doesn't show here.
0:0:25.370 --> 0:0:29.580
Keith Low
And then I thought, well, you then you go to your country and you should.
0:0:29.590 --> 0:0:30.760
Keith Low
You should share that screen.
0:0:30.870 --> 0:0:31.780
Keith Low
You have two screens.
0:0:31.830 --> 0:0:33.120
Keith Low
Yeah, you stop.
0:0:33.610 --> 0:0:34.380
Keith Low
You stop sharing.
0:0:35.610 --> 0:0:36.890
Keith Low
Uh, I think he's here.
0:0:38.140 --> 0:0:38.280
Joshua Haseldine
Hello.
0:0:38.40 --> 0:0:38.690
Keith Low
Stop you.
0:0:39.190 --> 0:0:39.390
Keith Low
Hi.
0:0:39.400 --> 0:0:41.630
Keith Low
Hi just four now I'm trying to share my screen.
0:0:47.660 --> 0:0:49.960
Keith Low
If can you see the script?
0:0:51.580 --> 0:0:52.580
Joshua Haseldine
Uh, yes, I can say OK.
0:0:53.100 --> 0:0:54.650
Keith Low
OK, OK.
0:0:54.660 --> 0:0:56.370
Keith Low
Uh today discussion.
0:0:56.380 --> 0:1:0.220
Keith Low
Actually I wanted to post about the licensing UI this part.
0:1:1.0 --> 0:1:4.90
Keith Low
So I think that they went through rivers.
0:1:6.170 --> 0:1:8.590
Keith Low
She mention view product instance.
0:1:10.350 --> 0:1:14.920
Keith Low
Follow I mean toothbrush instead, and then next is view all user.
0:1:15.610 --> 0:1:27.390
Keith Low
So I think in our Internet discussion between myself just mean and social media, we feel that we should have one more, which is the respective license type so that we can do both assigning.
0:1:28.420 --> 0:1:29.140
Keith Low
So I think the.
0:1:31.120 --> 0:1:37.950
Keith Low
You wanted to have something from from doing that as well as just knew we love this license type.
0:1:39.810 --> 0:1:45.700
Keith Low
You will be very manual is like as long as you have to to them which user to be assigned to what license.
0:1:46.230 --> 0:1:50.620
Keith Low
So I think if you have like 10 user, 20 user that is fine.
0:1:50.670 --> 0:1:57.350
Keith Low
But imagine if you got 100 users E it probably would be a problem better if you choose the license back.
0:1:57.360 --> 0:2:3.20
Keith Low
I can one button and choose four users within that same license type and actually assign them, so that could be easier.
0:2:4.640 --> 0:2:5.130
Keith Low
So what?
0:2:5.140 --> 0:2:5.600
Keith Low
What do you think?
0:2:8.740 --> 0:2:9.390
Joshua Haseldine
Uh, I'm.
0:2:9.480 --> 0:2:11.350
Joshua Haseldine
I mean, I'm fine with this.
0:2:11.400 --> 0:2:16.370
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah, like you know, sorry, the UI isn't really my aspect there is it?
0:2:16.800 --> 0:2:17.770
Joshua Haseldine
I'm not doing the UI.
0:2:22.480 --> 0:2:22.910
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:2:19.100 --> 0:2:22.950
Keith Low
So the the uh that having the show us what she had.
0:2:22.920 --> 0:2:23.800
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah, that's fine.
0:2:23.850 --> 0:2:26.90
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah, yeah, I I agree about the books on users.
0:2:26.400 --> 0:2:29.270
Joshua Haseldine
And sorry, sorry.
0:2:29.280 --> 0:2:32.880
Joshua Haseldine
Is there confusion here that I'm the guy to go for for this UI?
0:2:34.250 --> 0:2:37.670
Joshua Haseldine
Because I I spoke with Christopher yesterday, I was concerned about this.
0:2:37.680 --> 0:2:38.150
Joshua Haseldine
The father.
0:2:38.220 --> 0:2:42.180
Joshua Haseldine
I'm sort of being heralded as the guy to go with comfort for the UI.
0:2:42.970 --> 0:2:44.630
Joshua Haseldine
This is being handled by platform, correct?
0:2:46.560 --> 0:2:48.150
Keith Low
The assigning, yes.
0:2:48.260 --> 0:2:49.910
Keith Low
But what happens Josh?
0:2:49.920 --> 0:2:51.410
Keith Low
After this right, you gonna get.
0:2:53.460 --> 0:2:53.740
Joshua Haseldine
Yes.
0:2:51.420 --> 0:2:55.150
Keith Low
Let's say if we do a bulk assignment, you get hundreds.
0:2:58.920 --> 0:2:59.120
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:2:55.160 --> 0:3:0.780
Keith Low
These events just fired up straight away when such nine and has happened.
0:3:2.480 --> 0:3:10.930
Keith Low
Uh, just I I think going back to your question, if you feel you are not the person to consult for oxide, should I check with Stephanie?
0:3:12.50 --> 0:3:12.320
Joshua Haseldine
Well.
0:3:10.940 --> 0:3:13.150
Keith Low
In that case, are you and then?
0:3:14.590 --> 0:3:20.710
Joshua Haseldine
No, Keith, I think we need a conversation with Christy Pierro because I'm, I'm all I'm doing.
0:3:20.720 --> 0:3:23.410
Joshua Haseldine
And what I can't speak with him about yesterday is just plugging in.
0:3:24.710 --> 0:3:25.900
Joshua Haseldine
Uh, I'm not.
0:3:25.910 --> 0:3:26.790
Joshua Haseldine
I'm not touching the UI.
0:3:28.250 --> 0:3:28.520
Keith Low
No, no.
0:3:28.530 --> 0:3:31.480
Keith Low
I'm actually referring to the UI that actually Harinder show us.
0:3:31.970 --> 0:3:33.800
Keith Low
Should we just mean myself and tell them?
0:3:33.810 --> 0:3:35.190
Keith Low
Remember, we went through with, yeah.
0:3:34.220 --> 0:3:36.150
Joshua Haseldine
Yes. Yeah, yeah.
0:3:36.160 --> 0:3:37.310
Joshua Haseldine
No, no, I I I'm sorry.
0:3:37.320 --> 0:3:38.360
Joshua Haseldine
I know I'm referring to you.
0:3:38.410 --> 0:3:40.750
Joshua Haseldine
I'm it's just, it's it's alright.
0:3:40.760 --> 0:3:40.990
Joshua Haseldine
Sorry.
0:3:41.0 --> 0:3:41.410
Joshua Haseldine
Carry on.
0:3:41.420 --> 0:3:43.810
Joshua Haseldine
We'll have this conversation offline, Keith, but.
0:3:46.620 --> 0:3:48.510
Joshua Haseldine
So what's and?
0:3:49.950 --> 0:3:50.600
Joshua Haseldine
What's the question?
0:3:49.730 --> 0:3:55.520
Keith Low
No, because what I didn't have shown us is actually a very manual way of assigning so-called bug user.
0:3:55.810 --> 0:3:58.660
Keith Low
I mean, yeah, Josh, I mean, you need to think about it.
0:3:58.670 --> 0:4:0.100
Keith Low
Those are your users.
0:4:0.110 --> 0:4:2.260
Keith Low
Those are the audit users, right?
0:4:1.500 --> 0:4:2.430
Joshua Haseldine
He yes.
0:4:2.850 --> 0:4:5.660
Keith Low
Your administrator, so I think you have.
0:4:5.670 --> 0:4:7.160
Keith Low
You have to have that some concern.
0:4:7.170 --> 0:4:9.830
Keith Low
Really, what happens in the platform because it's end of the day.
0:4:9.840 --> 0:4:11.220
Keith Low
Those are your administrators.
0:4:11.50 --> 0:4:11.640
Joshua Haseldine
No.
0:4:11.920 --> 0:4:12.980
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah, no. Yeah.
0:4:15.520 --> 0:4:22.10
Joshua Haseldine
Sorry, let's start again because the there's there's something else that's that's completely through this.
0:4:24.710 --> 0:4:25.560
Joshua Haseldine
I do.
0:4:25.930 --> 0:4:28.0
Keith Low
I mean.
0:4:25.570 --> 0:4:29.140
Joshua Haseldine
We have these visuals, Keith cause sorry, there's not really a visual aspect here.
0:4:29.150 --> 0:4:31.450
Joshua Haseldine
I'm only thank you very much, Jasmine.
0:4:31.730 --> 0:4:43.310
Keith Low
E Yeah, maybe we we go through the figma, maybe you you talk then you can check I think I checked the one you can just click on the link what no problem.
0:4:53.580 --> 0:4:55.890
Joshua Haseldine
So yeah, so I alright.
0:4:55.940 --> 0:4:56.610
Joshua Haseldine
OK, sorry.
0:4:56.620 --> 0:4:57.950
Joshua Haseldine
What's what's the main question here?
0:4:59.500 --> 0:5:0.580
Keith Low
Uh, yeah.
0:5:0.650 --> 0:5:2.510
Keith Low
Harinder has shown us.
0:5:4.940 --> 0:5:10.290
Keith Low
So yeah, I think the, uh, the can you hear me, Joshua.
0:5:10.550 --> 0:5:10.980
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:5:10.990 --> 0:5:11.510
Joshua Haseldine
Can you Jasmine?
0:5:10.720 --> 0:5:12.870
Keith Low
Yeah, yeah, I didn't hear.
0:5:13.160 --> 0:5:15.750
Keith Low
So the initial design that we.
0:5:18.150 --> 0:5:25.580
Keith Low
That we shouldn't have window as per discounts and online is the UI for the licensing screen.
0:5:25.950 --> 0:5:26.130
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:5:25.750 --> 0:5:34.110
Keith Low
It will be based on the license type basic need to say the user will click on the license type.
0:5:34.890 --> 0:5:35.80
Joshua Haseldine
Uh-huh.
0:5:35.20 --> 0:5:35.910
Keith Low
Uh.
0:5:44.190 --> 0:5:44.370
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:5:35.970 --> 0:5:49.150
Keith Low
And then, uh, you will have the license, a lease for us to choose which license type that we want to go through and then for from that license type, it will kind of like show the list of the user.
0:5:49.220 --> 0:5:57.10
Keith Low
So those user is the user that have the relationship with the user to product as that's assigning.
0:5:57.700 --> 0:6:5.260
Keith Low
So from there we were able to back assign user to specific license type.
0:6:6.500 --> 0:6:7.10
Keith Low
Yeah.
0:6:7.90 --> 0:6:36.510
Keith Low
So that is the conversation earlier that uh, we kind of like align in the sense that for the requirement, but the later, I think there's some conversation that uh between you and Harinder and then we kind of like have some call later that you mentioned that it seems to be we will need to look into more on the user focus as in that we need to be able to assign like multiple license to the user that we selected.
0:6:37.30 --> 0:6:37.240
Joshua Haseldine
Uh-huh.
0:6:36.770 --> 0:6:49.950
Keith Low
I think we that that is the part that Keith mentioned is kind of like a little bit manual in the sense that when we click on the user, we can't like need to define what is the user type that they will need to be assigned to.
0:6:52.740 --> 0:6:56.110
Joshua Haseldine
OK, I'm really sorry, your line is not very good.
0:6:56.460 --> 0:6:58.890
Joshua Haseldine
The last bit just cut out at the end.
0:6:59.40 --> 0:6:59.480
Joshua Haseldine
What?
0:7:0.330 --> 0:7:1.590
Joshua Haseldine
What was the the last tenant?
0:7:1.600 --> 0:7:1.840
Joshua Haseldine
She said.
0:7:5.70 --> 0:7:15.880
Keith Low
Ohh yeah, so I think the last statement is about the one the discussion that we I mean you and Harinder had and we kinda like have a call earlier.
0:7:16.30 --> 0:7:28.40
Keith Low
I think it's more on like by user level assigning user per user level to assign the license type that we want to.
0:7:28.330 --> 0:7:34.540
Keith Low
So with that, I think we can't achieve like a bug assigned to specific license type.
0:7:34.940 --> 0:7:36.440
Keith Low
Yeah, I think this is about.
0:7:37.490 --> 0:7:37.650
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:7:38.530 --> 0:7:45.600
Keith Low
This is about so if if we don't choose the license right, you will have a mix of license plate over here.
0:7:49.350 --> 0:7:50.440
Joshua Haseldine
Yes, now you can't.
0:7:45.610 --> 0:7:51.810
Keith Low
I can't do both assigning in cases like this, so the that make more never.
0:7:50.450 --> 0:7:51.890
Joshua Haseldine
We need to use the instance first.
0:7:52.380 --> 0:7:56.720
Keith Low
Yeah, we got one more level where we can achieve filter based on the license type.
0:7:57.250 --> 0:7:57.630
Joshua Haseldine
Umm.
0:7:56.730 --> 0:7:59.500
Keith Low
Then whatever comes, everybody will have the same license type.
0:7:59.510 --> 0:8:4.980
Keith Low
I I I can actually click one button and and just bought a sign everybody up in that list.
0:8:5.960 --> 0:8:6.120
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:8:8.80 --> 0:8:14.710
Keith Low
If you're fine with that, I'll go back to calendar to actually ask her to actually filter one more level, which is the license type.
0:8:15.240 --> 0:8:16.80
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah, it make it.
0:8:16.90 --> 0:8:19.830
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah, it it E it makes sense to have it that way, Keith.
0:8:19.840 --> 0:8:25.270
Joshua Haseldine
So yeah, if you could go back to horrenda with that, I mean I she was, it was she in that call earlier.
0:8:25.280 --> 0:8:26.10
Joshua Haseldine
I can't recall.
0:8:26.120 --> 0:8:27.520
Joshua Haseldine
Sorry, I've been in too many calls this week.
0:8:27.510 --> 0:8:27.780
Keith Low
So.
0:8:29.700 --> 0:8:30.0
Keith Low
Right.
0:8:29.600 --> 0:8:33.220
Joshua Haseldine
But it said she might already be aware of this, but yeah.
0:8:35.920 --> 0:8:38.870
Keith Low
I think she she told us that she she will wait for us for our meeting.
0:8:39.690 --> 0:8:39.990
Joshua Haseldine
OK.
0:8:43.50 --> 0:8:43.540
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:8:43.550 --> 0:8:44.600
Joshua Haseldine
Let, let's.
0:8:38.880 --> 0:8:47.100
Keith Low
So I think if we confirm this, I I will get back to her immediately, so that she just had one more level of filtering.
0:8:47.560 --> 0:8:47.870
Keith Low
Yeah.
0:8:47.880 --> 0:8:51.110
Keith Low
Keith, just wanted to have one more question for Joshua.
0:8:52.780 --> 0:8:53.290
Joshua Haseldine
Yep.
0:8:51.120 --> 0:8:58.370
Keith Low
Can you open the link if that's the case like since we are going back to license type focus for bot assigning right?
0:8:58.420 --> 0:9:10.750
Keith Low
So I'm just wondering, can we still go back to the previous design, which is we will select the license type and whichever, yeah, can open the boxer mix screen?
0:9:14.600 --> 0:9:16.540
Keith Low
E Yeah, yeah, yeah.
0:9:17.930 --> 0:9:32.450
Keith Low
Are we still good to back to this particular design that initially we spoke to Harinder, which is there will be Audi and release uh yeah, which is the license type in the menu for user to select.
0:9:32.580 --> 0:9:36.460
Keith Low
So when user click on audit then you will have.
0:9:36.200 --> 0:9:39.790
Joshua Haseldine
Uh, so she uses a less as a more of a left hand NAV than it is.
0:9:39.840 --> 0:9:43.80
Joshua Haseldine
OK I you.
0:9:45.210 --> 0:9:47.480
Joshua Haseldine
You I can't see any issue. Why?
0:9:49.230 --> 0:9:49.900
Joshua Haseldine
I'm.
0:9:54.850 --> 0:9:56.460
Joshua Haseldine
What if well?
0:9:58.700 --> 0:10:3.90
Joshua Haseldine
How will we generate if it's a global user?
0:10:5.670 --> 0:10:9.740
Joshua Haseldine
And I presume if anyone only has audit and risk it that side NAV wouldn't show right?
0:10:14.60 --> 0:10:14.790
Keith Low
Sorry your question.
0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:19.550
Joshua Haseldine
So, well, there's two questions really, which is 1?
0:10:19.560 --> 0:10:38.460
Joshua Haseldine
How would we display a global user so a user who has access to both audit and risk and two, I presume that left hand NAV wouldn't exist if a user only has the audit module so it would just you know that that would it wouldn't exist and it would just showed us main individual page.
0:10:41.650 --> 0:10:45.180
Keith Low
And don't basically the audio and retail right?
0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:54.380
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:10:45.230 --> 0:10:57.860
Keith Low
What we are going to show here is is with the relationship that when I think the clouds, when they create the product instances so they would have a different type information within the product instances.
0:10:58.330 --> 0:11:2.730
Keith Low
So the one that we click on audit, we have a clean audit.
0:11:2.740 --> 0:11:8.700
Keith Low
We were we were able to see what are the product instances that having the audit license type.
0:11:9.550 --> 0:11:23.350
Keith Low
So the user that underneath the particular section which is on the table is the user that have already been assigned to either one of the product instances that have the relationship with all the.
0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:29.940
Joshua Haseldine
OK, I think this visual makes sense.
0:11:29.950 --> 0:11:39.670
Joshua Haseldine
The only issue I have is how we would showcase by a user who has both and which I I think that's fairly straightforward actually. Umm.
0:11:38.990 --> 0:11:47.970
Keith Low
I think it will need to go to each of the license type to check for which either you yeah the user.
0:11:46.190 --> 0:11:48.260
Joshua Haseldine
To check for both.
0:11:49.140 --> 0:11:50.160
Keith Low
Yeah, you need to go.
0:11:48.320 --> 0:11:50.220
Joshua Haseldine
OK. Umm.
0:11:51.430 --> 0:12:5.410
Keith Low
Pain in the product of done before the case that we have a screen that shows all the license types and all the users and like a grid who's been who's got what with the tick boxes on them.
0:12:5.980 --> 0:12:15.290
Keith Low
Like I can show you share it with you just on later on because you have it looked like and probably having the one like the one doing is for view purposes on your right.
0:12:19.450 --> 0:12:19.670
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.910
Keith Low
But for assigning this give me to Google assign them if you want to still.
0:12:20.110 --> 0:12:36.160
Keith Low
Well, you can do it that way, but we have a bulk as well, so that that's just like to give you one thing, because all the users and all the licenses types and you can do that sign and that way if you want or you can do the bulk assignments as well.
0:12:36.850 --> 0:12:46.440
Keith Low
But I mean, when you have Technology view, if you do but when signing, then if we filter one more level license type so that I can click on everybody he's doing that would not have that filter, right.
0:12:46.860 --> 0:12:48.790
Keith Low
Yeah, but you definitely.
0:12:48.800 --> 0:12:52.930
Keith Low
It's the idea of you can see which users allocated to what.
0:12:52.940 --> 0:12:53.430
Keith Low
Really.
0:12:53.670 --> 0:12:56.170
Keith Low
Umm, so it's from the user point of view.
0:12:56.180 --> 0:12:58.590
Keith Low
It's like ohh OK so I have 10 users.
0:12:58.680 --> 0:13:0.210
Keith Low
What are they really allocated?
0:13:0.220 --> 0:13:8.270
Keith Low
Instead of clicking every because we're gonna play clicking all the trust, all the, then if we have five types or the trust something else, something else, yeah.
0:13:10.470 --> 0:13:11.500
Keith Low
I can share that screen.
0:13:11.510 --> 0:13:13.180
Keith Low
There's still give you an idea, yeah.
0:13:15.690 --> 0:13:22.940
Keith Low
So with that screen is able to achieve part assembly as well and not on that screen we have another screen that does the work assignment.
0:13:22.950 --> 0:13:26.690
Keith Low
This is more like of giving you the whole thing in one view.
0:13:28.180 --> 0:13:29.610
Keith Low
That makes sense, but what actually?
0:13:32.510 --> 0:13:34.400
Keith Low
I'm not sure how you would do it all in one screen.
0:13:34.410 --> 0:13:37.540
Keith Low
I think gets complicated and on on that one screen.
0:13:41.100 --> 0:13:45.570
Joshua Haseldine
It's sorry to interrupt, but I'm I'm generally not sure what the conversation is.
0:13:45.970 --> 0:13:46.410
Keith Low
Like uh.
0:13:45.580 --> 0:13:46.810
Joshua Haseldine
It keeps breaking up.
0:13:47.160 --> 0:13:50.100
Joshua Haseldine
It's it's, it's a really poor line, I'm afraid.
0:13:53.820 --> 0:13:56.840
Joshua Haseldine
So was there any other actions on my side though?
0:13:57.740 --> 0:14:8.140
Keith Low
No, I think what Duraid is suggesting is that another view where we can see every single user like like a like a pitch that actually shows all the license they are assigned.
0:14:10.740 --> 0:14:11.120
Joshua Haseldine
OK.
0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.60
Keith Low
And one of you that shows you all users all licensed types.
0:14:14.780 --> 0:14:14.980
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:14:21.570 --> 0:14:21.760
Keith Low
Yeah.
0:14:16.930 --> 0:14:25.360
Joshua Haseldine
So what's so you'd have all all that is not going back to the original design, though that horrendous showed where we had all.
0:14:25.370 --> 0:14:27.10
Joshua Haseldine
And then you could filter between audit and risk.
0:14:27.20 --> 0:14:27.980
Joshua Haseldine
Or have I misunderstood?
0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:32.80
Keith Low
Yeah, like we've got design, you have to click at audit to see the users.
0:14:32.90 --> 0:14:33.960
Keith Low
Then you have to click the rest, then see the users.
0:14:33.970 --> 0:14:36.730
Keith Low
If you have 5 license types, you have to keep clicking back and forward.
0:14:37.130 --> 0:14:38.150
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
0:14:38.730 --> 0:14:42.640
Keith Low
And and don't forget that maybe in the future that we are the product as well.
0:14:46.70 --> 0:14:46.350
Joshua Haseldine
Umm.
0:14:42.710 --> 0:14:59.220
Keith Low
So the the list kind of look at it longer that, I mean I think it's very important to find out the angles of the view, right should we is there a need to look at the list of user but the features or look at the user have how many license?
0:14:59.230 --> 0:15:0.800
Keith Low
I think there's some we need to decide for.
0:15:1.290 --> 0:15:7.870
Keith Low
Yeah, I mean, we for people, yeah, we use the screen heavily lately because people lost what they have.
0:15:9.600 --> 0:15:17.550
Keith Low
So that's they've got all the search capabilities, all the filtering and Duffy license types and assignment, as well as the same thing.
0:15:17.560 --> 0:15:20.670
Keith Low
Which one screen, but that's what we developed really.
0:15:21.60 --> 0:15:24.120
Keith Low
Even for me or someone else, right.
0:15:24.200 --> 0:15:26.630
Keith Low
Does the admin wanted to look at this?
0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:27.350
Keith Low
How many?
0:15:27.410 --> 0:15:28.190
Keith Low
Which user?
0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:37.730
Keith Low
How many users assigned to 1 features but the user model view when they look at themselves, they wanted to know like let's say particular these users is assigned to work.
0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.510
Keith Low
If you look at JIRA system, if they have both you.
0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:42.850
Keith Low
Yeah.
0:15:42.860 --> 0:15:58.130
Keith Low
Let me share about both make it clear how it works, but if you want to look at it from the users perspective, why don't this if inside user management and say yeah, we're having coming, we'll have it from the user perspective because for the user user don't even care about that level of field.
0:15:58.140 --> 0:16:6.320
Keith Low
That's more straight to really, and the user we have in the profile when they open up their profile, they'll show them what licenses they are assigned to.
0:16:7.450 --> 0:16:11.210
Keith Low
That's what we have as well, but that's just more freely of formation.
0:16:12.140 --> 0:16:20.270
Keith Low
This is more like if administrators who actually deal with what and do the assignments to simplify for administrators, really, that's really the view is for.
0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:30.130
Keith Low
Let me beat you.
0:16:30.140 --> 0:16:32.90
Keith Low
Sent to you guys?
0:16:32.100 --> 0:16:33.140
Keith Low
Yeah, have a look out.
0:16:34.40 --> 0:16:37.70
Keith Low
Probably having the problem will now start thinking differently as well.
0:16:37.80 --> 0:16:38.640
Keith Low
Once you look at the screens like that.
0:16:42.270 --> 0:16:48.740
Keith Low
So the proof right now is that because you will list out all the users from all the product themselves, right?
0:16:48.830 --> 0:16:51.460
Keith Low
No, you stole other product analysis level.
0:16:51.950 --> 0:16:56.160
Keith Low
You still level, so it's users from all that particular product.
0:16:56.650 --> 0:16:57.240
Keith Low
Yeah.
0:16:57.710 --> 0:16:58.200
Keith Low
OK.
0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:2.260
Keith Low
But we are not filtering through license type anymore, right?
0:17:3.410 --> 0:17:3.600
Joshua Haseldine
We.
0:17:2.270 --> 0:17:3.660
Keith Low
I mean, that's just an idea.
0:17:3.670 --> 0:17:19.410
Keith Low
Like to actually look at it so you have your license types on horizon play and your users, let's say vertically and it's like can become like a great because the same license types not allowed with other license types.
0:17:19.900 --> 0:17:23.10
Keith Low
That's why you need to think about when it comes to business users.
0:17:23.20 --> 0:17:25.410
Keith Low
For example, there will be a business logic.
0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:30.550
Keith Low
It won't let you tick audit and business user just doesn't make sense.
0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:38.670
Keith Low
Would do that without makes sense, so they won't be only business user and you won't be allowed to take risk or audit.
0:17:39.100 --> 0:17:39.590
Keith Low
Yes.
0:17:39.780 --> 0:17:44.310
Keith Low
And that's when this view makes a lot of sense to to see them that way as well.
0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:44.910
Keith Low
I'll send it.
0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.610
Keith Low
That makes sense when you say and then once. Great.
0:17:52.490 --> 0:17:52.940
Keith Low
Bye.
0:17:53.0 --> 0:17:53.220
Keith Low
OK.
0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:59.560
Keith Low
Uh, I think Josh uh, once we get from from Duraid on this.
0:18:0.190 --> 0:18:4.600
Keith Low
Uh, myself and and just a minute, you try to work out something.
0:18:4.610 --> 0:18:5.320
Keith Low
Some some work out.
0:18:5.330 --> 0:18:9.50
Keith Low
Then you come back to you and having them is that OK?
0:18:10.210 --> 0:18:13.300
Joshua Haseldine
Uh, I I I'm so sorry, Keith.
0:18:13.310 --> 0:18:17.300
Joshua Haseldine
I I can't really hear what what was said.
0:18:22.690 --> 0:18:22.870
Keith Low
Yeah.
0:18:17.590 --> 0:18:23.260
Joshua Haseldine
Is there any chance anyone could bullet point action the things that have been discussed in the actions that are taken from this meeting?
0:18:23.610 --> 0:18:25.40
Joshua Haseldine
If possible please thank you.
0:18:25.360 --> 0:18:25.650
Keith Low
I'll.
0:18:25.660 --> 0:18:26.20
Keith Low
I'll do that.
0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:34.110
Joshua Haseldine
Alright, cause yeah, that's why I sorry I had uh proposal from Duraid and then that I had.
0:18:34.120 --> 0:18:40.270
Joshua Haseldine
Sorry, I had to write out the proposal and then I didn't hear what the proposal was, so if someone could just.
0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:40.840
Joshua Haseldine
Yeah.
0:18:40.850 --> 0:18:43.730
Joshua Haseldine
Send it across to me cause apologies, this line is is terrible.
0:18:45.550 --> 0:18:45.850
Joshua Haseldine
I'm.
0:18:45.220 --> 0:18:46.20
Keith Low
No, no problem.
0:18:46.60 --> 0:18:50.40
Keith Low
I our some summarize our meeting then then I think we we can take it from there.
0:18:52.910 --> 0:18:53.190
Joshua Haseldine
OK.
0:18:52.930 --> 0:18:54.640
Keith Low
I think that's fine.
0:18:54.730 --> 0:18:55.200
Keith Low
Yeah.
0:18:55.290 --> 0:18:55.980
Keith Low
Anymore question?
0:18:57.180 --> 0:18:58.950
Keith Low
No, not OK.
0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:0.430
Keith Low
I I think that's about it.
0:19:0.680 --> 0:19:2.120
Keith Low
Thank Josh for freaking time for this.
0:19:3.50 --> 0:19:3.710
Joshua Haseldine
And course.
0:19:3.790 --> 0:19:4.210
Joshua Haseldine
Thank you.
0:19:4.830 --> 0:19:5.260
Keith Low
Thank you.
0:19:5.270 --> 0:19:6.0
Keith Low
Thank you.
0:19:6.50 --> 0:19:6.980
Keith Low
Bye. Bye bye.
0:19:7.800 --> 0:19:8.390
Keith Low
Thank you.
0:19:8.460 --> 0:19:9.460
Keith Low
I'll send it to you. It's.


The above is the transcript of a meeting. Extract all info and the action needed. Re-read the transcript again to make sure nothing is missed.