You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Seismic data is collected to analyze the subsurface of the Earth, and is particularly collected in connection with hydrocarbon exploration and production activities. Seismic data for analyzing subsurface structures may be collected on land or over water. In order to obtain seismic data, an acoustic source is used which typically consists of explosives or a seismic vibrator on land or an impulse of compressed air at sea. The seismic signals reflected by the various geologic layers beneath the surface of the Earth are known as traces and are sensed by a large number, typically hundreds or thousands, of sensors such as geophones on land and hydrophones at sea. The reflected signals are recorded and the results are analyzed to derive an indication of the geology in the subsurface. Such indications may then be used to assess the likelihood and location of potential hydrocarbon deposits.
Seismic surveys are generally conducted using one or more receiver lines having a plurality of receiver station locations spaced evenly along their lengths. In a two dimensional (2D) survey, a single receiver line is used and the acoustic source is typically positioned at various points in-line with the receiver line. In a three dimensional survey, a plurality of parallel receiver lines are typically used and the acoustic source is generally positioned at various points offset from the receiver lines. While a 2D seismic survey can only create a cross-sectional representation of the subsurface, a 3D seismic survey can be used to develop a three dimensional representation of the subsurface.
Seismic data are subject to a wide variety of noise related problems that can and do limit its usefulness. Broadly speaking, noise found in seismic traces is either incoherent or coherent. Incoherent ambient noise, or uncorrelated “white” noise, is ubiquitous and is generally greatly attenuated through the simple expedient of stacking, although extremely large individual data values (“spikes”) and “bad” traces often need special attention. Coherent, or correlated, noise on the other hand cannot usually be so readily eliminated. Some common examples of coherent noise include multiple reflections, ground roll, air waves, guided waves, sideswipe, cable noise and 60 hertz power line noise. Among the many known approaches to attenuating noise, there are space-time based or transform based methods. Space-time based methods operate on the time series of the acquired data. Transform based methods operate on data transformed from the space-time domain into another domain using a suitable transformation. The most popular of the 2-D transform methods is the 2-D Fourier transform (or “f-k” transform). Seismic data containing noise are transformed to the alternative domain where noise events are more compactly represented. If the noise energy can be located and isolated in the transform domain, it is removed from the transformed data by filtering or muting, i.e. by setting the values in the region corresponding to the noise energy equal to zero or some other minimal value. Finally, the transformed data, without the noise energy, are then inverse transformed to return them to the time and offset (i.e., untransformed or “x-t”) domain.
In conventional seismic data acquisition systems data are inherently filtered through use of “hard-wired” (electrically connected) groups of sensors. A group or receiver array delivers a single output trace (the normalized sum or arithmetic average of the output of all individual sensors of the group) at the particular receiver station location about which the sensors are placed. The single trace is the normalized sum or arithmetic average of the output of all individual sensors making up the group. Without further processing, such a two-dimensional group has a spectral response that can be approximated by a frequency- independent 2D sinc function in the wavenumber or kx-ky domain.
More recently, however, seismic surveys have been performed using single or point receiver arrays. Such surveys offer the potential of recording the output of individual sensors or receivers and the inherent filtering effect of the hard-wired group can be replaced by filters that are better adapted to the nature of seismic noise and preserve more of the seismic reflection signals.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide methods for processing seismic data, particularly methods for designing and applying filters for such data.