Given multiple reviews about 1975 tv series Wonder Woman, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ["Lynda Carter's portrayal of Wonder Woman was one of the best superhero performances ever. She really came across as a super-powerful female, just as Lou Ferrigno came across on The Incredible Hulk as a super-powerful green-skinned goliath. What was even better was when Debra Winger guest-starred in three episodes as WW's sister, Wonder Girl. Talk about a double dose of babeness!!!", "I used to occasionally watch this when I was younger, when it was on the weekends on MeTV. I don't like Lydia Carter's acting to be honest, I would usually look at the show because of the charisma of Lyle Wagonner (who plays Steve Trevor/Jr.). For me, 6-7 years ago it was ok. The plots weren't great. Looking at it again, several years later, the plots usually revolve in a similar matter. I wouldn't really recommend this show. Giving it an extra review star just because of Lyle Wagonner.", 'Prime time 70s superhero series about a woman with fantastic powers. Firstly the theme tune, and the images (animated or non-animated) that go with the theme song, are outstanding. Each season the opening would change so there are in fact three or four intros you must track down on YouTube! All intros rank as some of the best intros seen on TV ever! The series itself? It was enjoyed more in my 1970s childhood but some of it still stands up today. I personally call myself a science fiction fan rather than a Wonder Woman fan so I liked the episodes with a strong sci-fi element the most: Season 2: Mind Stealers From Outer Space (two-parter). Love the Star Wars (1977) look. Love the stock footage from This Island Earth (1955). Season 2: The Bermuda Triangle Crisis. Stock footage of the submarine Seaview from Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea (1964-68) is used. Season 3: Time Bomb. People from earth\'s future appear in the 1970s. Stock footage from Space 1999 (1974-77) is used. Season 3: Gault\'s Brain. Character actor John Carradine does the voice of a living human brain in a jar. Outstanding guest stars all round! Season 3: The Boy Who Knew Her Secret (two-parter). Misleading episode title as this more about remaking Invasion Of The Body Snatchers. These seven episodes are from the years when WW had left the 1940s and moved into the 1970s. The series started in the 1940s. WW season one was billed as a "campy" female take on 1966 Batman. Well, I can proudly say that I think 1966 Batman is one of the greatest TV shows ever made so someone like myself should welcome WW season one with open arms, correct? I liked year one and found it amusing sometimes, but frankly, instead of the promoted "camp" I was more interested in the wonderful 1940s vintage cars all over the place. Make of that what you will? And finally, fans of TV music will get a blast out of season three as a new composer was employed for the series - Richard LaSalle. During the 60s/70s LaSalle had worked a lot for Irwin Allen (Land of the Giants season two, City Beneath The Sea, The Amazing Captain Nemo, etc) and the new sound to WW sort of seemed like a wink to Irwin Allen science fiction....to me atleast.']

        Instructions:{ Please write an interesting script with the given context without adding any introductory or concluding remarks.
        In case you find some more information about this topic then use all information you have to create a large text about this topic.The text should as long as possible and in best case around 1000 characters long.
        Ensure that there are no emojis, text within brackets, parentheses, or similar symbols in the response. 
        Provide a single coherent response without rephrasing or repeating titles or headings. Avoid enumerations or bullet points. 
        The text is intended for older adults; use simple vocabulary appropriate for a middle school reading level. Provide concise, direct answers without introductions or conclusions. 
        Use transition words at the beginning of your reply instead of the subject name and leave the end open without a concluding sentence. 
        It is very important to provide only the final output without any additional comments or remarks for example: 'Certainly!' Here's the revised text.
         
        Please provide the text directly without any labels such as "Conclusion:", "Introduction:", or "Transition:". Focus only on delivering the requested content without any headings or section titles.
        Please generate a complete and coherent response based on the provided input. Ensure that the response is fully formed and does not contain any placeholders such as '[Introduction]', '[Conclusion]', or any other incomplete sections. 
        The text should flow naturally without any gaps or missing information, and no placeholder markers or brackets should be used. 
        Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words "Reply finished" to indicate that your response is complete. 
        Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.}