You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Q:

Create annotation to a contact entity in Microsoft Dynamics CRM by API

This question is related to Microsoft Dynamics CRM 2015, that I'm calling through API.
I create contact entity:
POST [organization URI]/api/data/contacts
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/json
{
    "emailaddress1": "myemail@example.com",
}

It works, I see new record, after I log into the panel.
And I can call it through the API:
[organization URI]/api/data/contacts(f76e4e7c-ea61-e511-80fd-3863bb342b00)
{
  "@odata.context":"[organization URI]/api/data/$metadata#contacts/$entity",
  "@odata.etag":"W/\"460199\"",
  ...
  "contactid":"f76e4e7c-ea61-e511-80fd-3863bb342b00",
  "emailaddress1":"myemail@example.com",
  ....
}

Next thing I want to do, is to add annotation record associated with that contact.
Following the guide I call:
POST [organization URI]/api/data/annotations
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/json
{
    "notetext": "TEST",
    'contact@odata.bind': 'contacts(f76e4e7c-ea61-e511-80fd-3863bb342b00)'
}

But it returns 400 error:

An undeclared property 'contact' which only has property annotations in the payload but no property value was found in the payload. In OData, only declared navigation properties and declared named streams can be represented as properties without values.

When I call:
POST [organization URI]/api/data/annotations
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/json
{
    "notetext": "TEST",
}

New entity is created, but without a relation to contact.
How to properly compose this POST request? What am I missing here?
I suspect, that contact@odata.bind should be presented somehow different, I've tried contactid@odata.bind, object@odata.bind, objectid@odata.bind - but no effects.
Any ideas?

A:

Instead of using objectid@odata.bind, you have to use objectid_contact@odata.bind. This results are in:
"objectid_contact@odata.bind": "/contacts(f76e4e7c-ea61-e511-80fd-3863bb342b00)"

To get the list of properties, look under the single-valued navigation properties in the documentation.

A:

I've found this working, but in two requests:
POST [organization URI]/api/data/annotations
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/json
{
    "notetext": "TEST"
}

POST [organization URI]/api/data/contacts(f76e4e7c-ea61-e511-80fd-3863bb342b00)/Contact_Annotation/$ref
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
Accept: application/json
{
    "@odata.id": "[organization URI]/annotations(annotation_id_from_first_request)"
}

Edit:
annotation_id_from_first_request value is taken form first request's response.

A:

Part 1:
MSDN Reference: Deep Insert

You can create entities related to each other by defining them as navigation properties values. This is known as deep insert.
  As with a basic create, the response OData-EntityId header contains the Uri of the created entity. The URIs for the related entities created aren’t returned.

Below code is to create Account (1), create + associate Primary contact (2), create & Associate Opportunity (3) and create + associate Task (4)
POST [Organization URI]/api/data/v8.2/accounts HTTP/1.1
Content-Type: application/json; charset=utf-8
OData-MaxVersion: 4.0
OData-Version: 4.0
Accept: application/json

{
 "name": "Sample Account",
 "primarycontactid":
 {
     "firstname": "John",
     "lastname": "Smith"
 },
 "opportunity_customer_accounts":
 [
  {
      "name": "Opportunity associated to Sample Account",
      "Opportunity_Tasks":
      [
       { "subject": "Task associated to opportunity" }
      ]
  }
 ]
}

Part 2:
Associating annotation to contact uses the below syntax.
note["objectid_contact@odata.bind"] = "/contacts(C5DDA727-B375-E611-80C8-00155D00083F)";

Refer SO link & blog
Part 3:
Answer to your comment on another answer about annotation_id_from_first_request:
To get the created record Id in response from last request, you can parse like below:
                //get Response from Created Record
                entityIdWithLink = XMLHttpRequest.getResponseHeader("OData-EntityId");

                //get EntityId from ResponseHeader of Created Record  
                getEntityId = entityIdWithLink.split(/[()]/);
                getEntityId = getEntityId[1];

You can read more

You can compose your POST request so that data from the created record will be returned with a status of 201 (Created).
  To get this result, you must use the return=representation preference in the request headers.
  To control which properties are returned, append the $select query option to the URL to the entity set.
  The $expand query option will be ignored if used.
  When an entity is created in this way the OData-EntityId header containing the URI to the created record is not returned
Note: This capability was added with December 2016 update for Dynamics 365

MSDN Reference: Create with data returned
Update:
If anyone looking for working payload sample to deep insert a record + annotation, the below is from my project:
data = {
        "new_attribute1": "test attribute 1",
        "new_attribute2": "test attribute 2",
        "new_comments": "test comments",
        "new_recordurl": recordURL,
        "new_feedback_Annotations":
            [
                {
                    "notetext": "Screenshot attached",
                    "subject": "Attachment",
                    "filename": file.name,
                    "mimetype": file.type,
                    "documentbody": base64str,
                }
            ]
    };