Hello, dear supervisor, I need the conclusion of the DIPLOMA WORK Features of translation of scientific texts of philosophical orientation (on the material of K. Popper's works)
Comment on how the conclusion should be written
"is written very simply on the task. Here is the first you have the task: the task to consider the definitions of the new text of the scientific text to determine its features, especially translation, so and you write that the analysis of the literature Legitcheko literature on scientific text, and showed that its features some such very mole, briefly these features must be considered when translating further Second task there consider for a philosophical text, as the object of the true wall. Again, we came by analyzing the position of the concept there. I do not know the definition of philosophical text we came to the conclusion that we have taken as a basis our following definition of philosophical text so-and-so and its features concluding, and we and you said what features we took as a basis, that is it is abstract, and there something further specificity of philosophical texts is that we must take into account such phenomena as again we and you said that we for again took interuality seven. All further the pre-translation analysis of a philosophical text popera has shown, that and briefly this text scientific there yes receivers such-and-such manikan The purpose such it is not necessary to describe all and that no further, as to strategy of privet translation, The main difficulty consisted that those field seven, yes, which solved such-and-such, somehow such-and-such strategies. Such-and-such translation transformations most such-and-such translation techniques use strategy such-and-such all and the last conclusion that I wrote to you to translate such a text translators need to have such a background knowledge in the field of, for example, there philosophy in the field of linguistics in the field of translation management, okay? None of the nonsense you wrote there, again nothing. You clearly go by the task and draw conclusions on the task."

research objectives:  
1. to study the concept of "scientific text" in linguistic research, to consider its characteristics, the peculiarities of translation.
2. to study the concept of "philosophical text" in linguistic research, considering its characteristics, features.
3. To consider specific strategies and techniques in the translation of scientific texts of philosophical orientation.
4. Conduct pre-translation analysis of Popper's philosophical texts, identifying potential difficulties of translation.
5. Analyze strategies and techniques of translation of philosophical texts in the works of K. Popper


result.
We have considered various definitions for the concept of a scientific text and for our work we settled on Eugene Naida's definition.
We considered the problem of identifying philosophical texts, but taking Patrick Blackburn's definition as the basis, we identified philosophical texts as a subspecies of scientific texts.

We have identified the following problems in the translation of philosophical texts
1. Conceptual and terminological variation:
2. Ambiguity and polysemy:
3. multi-level argumentation and dialectic:
4 . Cultural and historical specificity:
5. Intertextuality
To address them, identified the following strategies
1. Dynamic equivalence and formal equivalence
2. Scopus theory and communicative orientation approach
3. typology of text and language in translation
And the following techniques
1. transliteration as a specific translation technique (direct translation
2. Modulation as a polysemic approach (indirect translation)
3. Translation commentary as a way of explaining translation (indirect translation)
4. Neologism as a translation solution (indirect translation)

A pre-translation analysis of Popper's ideas and theories revealed potential difficulties in translation: conceptual and terminological variation; ambiguity and polysemy; difficulty in maintaining authorial argumentation and logical coherence; cultural and historical specificity; intertextuality. An analysis of existing translations of Popper's texts highlighted examples of problems and inconsistencies in translations of key terms and concepts.
Based on the analysis of the translation of 30 fragments of scientific text of philosophical orientation, it was found that the most commonly used approach is modulation, 15 fragments were translated using this method. Modulation was the second most common approach, used for 10 fragments to solve the translation problem. The translator turned to creating neologisms only 5 times. And the translation commentary as a translation solution when translating a philosophical text was additionally used as a secondary technique throughout the translation.
In conclusion, the translator of philosophical texts should have a background knowledge of philosophy, covering not only the work of the translated author, but also the whole philosophy and cultural specificity in the intertextuality of the translated text. The translator must be aware of the potential problems in translating philosophical texts and be able to find an approach to them, based on the strategies and techniques suggested by various scholars.