System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Recommend some helpful activities or conversation starters to use at meetups to break the ice.

[Ground truth Answer]
- “Let me tell you something very interesting…” (nature, history, ecology, language ,geography etc)
- Joke (neutral not abrasive)
- ask for help with something
- ask open ended questions

[Assistant's Response]
Breaking the ice at meetups can be crucial for fostering a welcoming environment and encouraging interaction among participants. Here are some engaging activities and conversation starters that can help achieve this:

### Activities

1. **Two Truths and a Lie**: Each participant shares two true statements and one false statement about themselves. The rest of the group tries to guess which statement is the lie, sparking conversation and laughter.

2. **Speed Networking**: Set a timer for 2-3 minutes, allowing participants to rotate and introduce themselves to different people. This fast-paced format helps everyone meet multiple attendees quickly.

3. **Common Ground**: Divide attendees into small groups and challenge them to find three things they all have in common. This encourages discussion and helps participants discover shared interests.

4. **Question Ball**: Use a beach ball with various questions written on it. Participants toss the ball around, and whoever catches it answers the question their thumb lands on, creating spontaneous discussions.

5. **Icebreaker Bingo**: Create bingo cards filled with traits or experiences (e.g., "has traveled to another country," "plays a musical instrument"). Participants mingle to find individuals who fit the descriptions, promoting engagement and interaction.

6. **Photo Sharing**: Ask participants to bring a meaningful photo on their phones. They can take turns sharing the story behind their photo, which can lead to deeper conversations.

### Conversation Starters

1. **What’s the best book you’ve read recently?**
2. **If you could have dinner with any historical figure, who would it be and why?**
3. **What’s one hobby you’ve always wanted to pick up but haven’t yet?**
4. **What’s the most interesting place you’ve ever visited?**
5. **If you could instantly learn any skill, what would it be?**
6. **What’s your favorite way to unwind after a busy day?**
7. **What’s a fun fact about yourself that not many people know?**
8. **If you could travel anywhere in the world right now, where would you go?**
9. **What’s your go-to comfort food?**
10. **What’s a movie or TV show you could watch over and over again?**

These activities and conversation starters can help create a relaxed atmosphere, encourage interaction, and make participants feel more comfortable, ultimately leading to a more enjoyable and productive meetup experience.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: