Rewrite the entire text below, make it sound more coherent and better. Mention everything in great detail, including Hadithes and Quran Verses. Be very sceptical of the author Mohammad Hijab and also add some additional good arguments:

''In the “Sapient Thoughts” episode, MoHijab’s interpretation of the Quran’s usage of the word “yawm” as part of the creation story is fundamentally flawed, as it lacks sufficient evidence from both scripture and Islamic tradition. Although the Arabic word “yawm” can have varied meanings, context and usage within the Quran clearly indicate that it refers to actual days in the creation narrative.
The Quran consistently maintains that Allah created the earth and everything within it in six days, aligning with the biblical account of creation. There is no evidence in Islamic tradition to suggest that “yawm” refers to a longer period or anything other than literal days. Hijab’s assertion that “yawm” can mean a longer period is merely an arbitrary reinterpretation of the verse to fit his personal narrative; it is a baseless claim unsupported by any Islamic hermeneutics, thereby lacking credibility.
Hijab’s reliance on Islamic scholars to support his argument is insufficient, as their opinions are not definitive proof of the Quran’s intended meaning. Furthermore, although the Prophet Muhammad’s cousin may have offered some deeper insight into the matter, it is essential to note that his view does not override the clear meaning present in the Quran itself. Additionally, Hijab’s attempt to differentiate the Quran’s creation account from that of the Genesis narrative in Christianity and Judaism does not address the fundamental issue of interpreting “yawm” as a literal day.
The Hadiths and the Quran also provide specifics on critical aspects of Islamic beliefs, teachings, and history. They emphasize several key principles and advice from the Prophet on living in accordance with Allah’s teachings. These Hadiths are considered authoritative sources for guidance on Islamic beliefs and practices, and they demonstrate the Prophet’s role as a teacher and guide. Using these texts as a foundation, it becomes clear that any reinterpretation of the word “yawm” should be met with skepticism unless supported by substantial evidence from both scripture and Islamic tradition.
Although MoHijab’s intention to present a nuance in his perspective appears well-meaning, his argument that “yawm” can be interpreted as a period longer than a day is unsupported by the Quran and Islamic tradition. The consistent emphasis in the Quran that Allah created the earth and everything within it in six days aligns with the biblical account of creation. Therefore, any reinterpretation of the word “yawm” without substantial support from scripture and Islamic tradition weakens the credibility of Hijab’s argument. 

Mohammed Hijab you are saying that your god and Jabril and Mohammed all said 6 "days" but you think that a day is not necessarily a day? Why did allah then call them "days"? Why not say "6 long periods of time like 1 day being 1000 years"? Again, islamic scholars (and Golden Boys likewise) are so eager to make the quran look stupid that your willing to through al lah under the bus. Why can't your god us correct  descriptive words when trying to be  descriptive?  Is it because Mohammed really had no clue and was being deceived by Satan? He was tricked before.  How do you actually know just what is true in the quram and what was from Satan? Answer- you CAN'T!

What about the hadith in Sahih Muslim that speaks about the seven days 
account of creation. Does it not contradict the Quran? If the Quran says
 six(6) days, how then can seven days of creation be true? Do you accept
 the hadith to be false? The hadith confirms the days of creation to be 
24hours. God created clay on the day of Sabt ( Sabath day) in the 
hadith. Is the day of sabt not 24hours? If you deny the days of creation
 to be of 24 hours, then first deny the hadith.''