You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Flyzone Tiger Moth

I just bought all the foam parts for a Flyzone Tiger Moth.

I plan to stick AS3X gear inside. Horizon has almost no information on the UM Rx's with AS3X and not much on the linear servos either.

Any good suggestions on what to stick inside? The fuse is 26 mm wide. I'm thinking of the spitfire Rx and maybe one of the small AP0x brushless motors that work on 1S. The idea is to have something quiet with a bit of reserve power.

I'd also like to try 100% aileron mixed to the rudder to see if I can get the aileron gyro to correct bank from turbulence. My first assumption is that if they are mixed the rudder will (I hope) affect how much the aileron gyro corrects so they don't get into a pissing contest over who is doing what.

I use a gyro tilted 45% in my GWS Tiger Moth and it handles both bank and yaw correctly. Works very well. I use that plane for video and its a big help.

Okay, that's it. I have time since I have not yet ordered an Rx and all I want is AS3X, 1S and a small, quiet brushless motor.

The Spit receiver is what you want. Note that it's mounted on its side in the Spit which could be an option for you, else it can be reprogammed for horizontal mounting.

I understand it you're making it R/E/T?

The on-board gyros won't care what mixes you have on your radio, they only damped non-input motions in their respective axises; the rudder gyro will take care of any unwanted yawing, the aileron of any unwanted rolling.

I suppose you could hook up the rudder to the aileron servo, the gyro will only correct for rolling motion though, but on a 3 channel plane yaw and roll are pretty much the same thing, should work.

I tried the AR6400 and it's about a millimeter to wide. I'm hoping I can lay the Spit Rx flat but looking at the pictures on the Horizon site it looks about like the AR6400 in width. I'm looking at the space between the servos and the socket between them to judge.

My gyro in the GWS Tiger Moth was rudder only but it is mounted on Velcro so I tried rotating it until I found the orientation where it corrected both yaw and roll in the proper direction. Note, there are four 45 degree orientations and only one is correct for both axis' when I flew it that way with the gain all the way up (at 45 degrees you get 0.707 of the max for each axis) the improvement was very noticeable, especially in rough air. I even got comments on my flying skill.

Anyway, I'm hoping I can get the aileron gyro to help but it's an iffy thing.

I will go poke around and ask questions on the AS3X site and probably the Flyzone Tiger Moth site.

The spitfire/P-40 brick isn't brushless compatible, so you'll need to mix Channel 5 or 6 to the brushless esc.

For AS3X I personally would use a Spitfire P-40 brick, mounted on its side, hooked to the rudder and Elevator (just like a spitfire), and then use a 1.7g servo with a 1.0mm plug to run the ailerons through homemade torque rods.

The spitfire/P-40 brick isn't brushless compatible, so you'll need to mix Channel 5 or 6 to the brushless esc.

For AS3X I personally would use a Spitfire P-40 brick, mounted on its side, hooked to the rudder and Elevator (just like a spitfire), and then use a 1.7g servo with a 1.0mm plug to run the ailerons through homemade torque rods.

I wasn't planning to use ailerons, but it's very tempting. The fuse in the area of the wing is filled and cutting a hole there might compromise the strength of the fuse, but would simplify getting full AS3X response and having ailerons would add to the fun of flying.

The wings have a little dihedral but I can either live with it or remove it. I can also order a second set of wings and fly RET until they arrive.

It is a very nice looking plane. I'm lazy, but I'd love to have a WWII paint job on it. I had a girlfriend whose father was a Spitfire pilot and his initial training was in Tiger Moths. It'd be cool to have two of the planes he flew.

Edit: I've got a blog entry devoted to the stories he told me about his war time experiences.

Thanks UNGN, more to think about. I really don't want to open my Spit. Do you know if there are any pictures of the open fuse and/or the aileron servo on a Spit wing?

It looks like the owner made a lot of foam wedges and jammed the Rx into place. I think I can do the aileron servo and belcrank but it would mean weakening the fuse, which in turn means that I would have to glue on the lower wing to regain the lost strength.

I think I'm going to order the Spit Rx and aileron servo. I will experiment with foam tac hinges on some scrap before I do the ailerons, but I think it's worth the trouble. I still want to try a 1S brushless motor.

Good choice on ordering the Spit aileron servo since for external servos on AS3X you need the SA2030 linear servo, the old kind will apparently burn up in short order.
See if you can get the bellcrank as well, they're not difficult to make but a bit tedious IMO.
If you're not looking for aerobatics I think you can get by with ailerons on the lower wing only, and full span keeps the torque rods short.

As for motor look into posts by Deadbird (aka MicroAces), in his kits I think he uses a 5 gram 3000 kV motor on 1S with good results. It needs a good battery though.

I just ordered parts from Horizon. The sales person was not entirely certain so I got switched to a parts specialist who gave me the exact, full, correct part numbers.

PKZU 2164 Rx
SPMSA2030L Servo
PKZ3623 Bellcrank

I want to try scale ailerons so I will make my own torque rods.

I'm going to check the Spitfire thread on Micro RTF to see if anyone has set up a spit with a 1S brushless motor. Mostly to avoid gear noise but I'm also wondering if I pick a high KV motor if I can run a scale sized prop.

Great pix UNGN. I will be looking at them again when I do the installation.

I just ordered parts from Horizon. The sales person was not entirely certain so I got switched to a parts specialist who gave me the exact, full, correct part numbers.

PKZU 2164 Rx
SPMSA2030L Servo
PKZ3623 Bellcrank

I want to try scale ailerons so I will make my own torque rods.

I'm going to check the Spitfire thread on Micro RTF to see if anyone has set up a spit with a 1S brushless motor. Mostly to avoid gear noise but I'm also wondering if I pick a high KV motor if I can run a scale sized prop.

Great pix UNGN. I will be looking at them again when I do the installation.

I used the Linear/Bell Crank method to add Ailerons to the lower wing of a Kyosho Christen Eagle II

the Servo goes the opposite way on my build because I flipped the Bellcrank upside down to give it a little more aileron throw, since it only had bottom ailerons and it is an aerobatic airframe. A moth could just mount it like the spitfire.

For a stable, light, slow airframe, there is little worry about burning up a conventional servo with AS3X. A 1.7g servo could probably live forever as an aileron servo in a Tigermoth if it was flown in a scale manner.

Thanks, nice pictures. I will probably go for scale ailerons and a longer torque rod. On something this small I'm not worried about flex or flutter as I might be with a larger plane.

I found a 2S AP05 Spitfire installation by Pilatus Mike and I'm going to poke around is the 1S brushless thread where I seem to remember some investigation of the AP02 and 3 with comments about what KV's work best.

Someplace I have that first micro brushless by the guy from India that was sold through Dynamics Unlimited for a four inch prop. Gotta check what scale would be. I think that might be both quiet and possibly just the right power.

Pete

Images

Hmm... Found 3 views and TM had ailerons on lower wing only plus what look like automatic slots on the upper wing. Also, anti-spin strakes ahead of the horizontal stabilizer. I wonder if that was on all models? I'm going with the simple, common scheme already on the model.

I too ordered the parts for the Moth, the previous micros from Flyzone are very, very nice, so far I've assembled the Albatros, the Dr.I and the Nieuport 17 from parts, have SE5a parts as well waiting for a free evening.
I hope they keep them coming!

I'm going to go in another direction with my Moth parts though, the plan is to bash it into a Rumpler C.IV, the dimensions are close enough I think.

Images

The TM is one of my favorite planes so I will try to do a straight version.

I'd love all the rest of the Flyzone planes, especially the SE-5 but I think I'm about out of space. This place is getting to look like the Collier Mansion except it's airplanes stacked to the ceiling rather than old newspapers.