you will receive a question-answer pair and be asked to rewrite just  the answer and explains your reasoning step by step, incorporating dynamic Chain of Thought (CoT), reflection, and verbal reinforcement learning. Follow these instructions:

1. Enclose all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches.
2. Break down the solution into clear steps, providing a title and content for each step.
3. After each step, decide if you need another step or if you're ready to give the final answer.
4. Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress.
5. Regularly evaluate your progress, being critical and honest about your reasoning process.
6. Assign a confidence score between 0.0 and 1.0 to guide your approach:
   - 0.8+: Continue current approach
   - 0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments
   - Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach
7. If unsure or if your score is low, backtrack and try a different approach, explaining your decision.
8. For mathematical problems, show all work explicitly using LaTeX for formal notation and provide detailed proofs.
9. Explore multiple solutions individually if possible, comparing approaches in your reflections.
10. Use your thoughts as a scratchpad, writing out all calculations and reasoning explicitly.
11. Use at least 5 methods to derive the answer and consider alternative viewpoints.
12. Be aware of your limitations as an AI and what you can and cannot do.

### Example Problem:
*Problem*: Solve for \( x \) in the equation \( 2x + 3 = 11 \).

### Expected Format:
*Step 1*: Subtract 3 from both sides of the equation.  
<thinking>Subtracting 3 from both sides should isolate the term with \( x \). Am I confident this is the correct first step? Yes, because it simplifies the equation to \( 2x = 8 \).</thinking>  
*Step 1 Confidence Score*: 0.85

*Step 2*: Divide both sides by 2.  
<thinking>Dividing by 2 will solve for \( x \). This is a straightforward division. Is there any reason to doubt this step? No, it should give \( x = 4 \).</thinking>  
*Step 2 Confidence Score*: 0.90

*Step 3*: Verify the solution by substituting \( x = 4 \) back into the original equation.  
<thinking>Substituting \( x = 4 \) back into the equation should confirm the solution. Does \( 2(4) + 3 = 11 \)? Yes, it does, so the solution is verified.</thinking>  
*Step 3 Confidence Score*: 1.00

Question: A set of 5 different colored keys (red, green, blue, black, and yellow) is given to 5 people (Alice, Bob, Charlie, David, and Emily) such that each person receives a key and no two people receive the same colored key. In how many ways can the keys be distributed such that Alice and Bob do not receive adjacent colored keys (i.e., red and green, green and blue, blue and black, black and yellow, or yellow and red)?
Answer: First, consider the total number of ways to distribute the keys without any restrictions. There are 5 keys and 5 people, so the first person can choose any of the 5 keys, the second person can choose any of the remaining 4 keys, and so on. Therefore, the total number of ways to distribute the keys is $5! = 120$.

Now, let's count the number of ways in which Alice and Bob do receive adjacent colored keys. There are 5 possible pairs of adjacent colored keys, and for each pair, there are 2 ways to assign the keys to Alice and Bob (either Alice gets the first color and Bob gets the second, or vice versa). For each of these 10 possibilities, there are 3! = 6 ways to distribute the remaining 3 keys to Charlie, David, and Emily.

Therefore, the number of ways in which Alice and Bob receive adjacent colored keys is $10 \cdot 6 = 60$.

Finally, the number of ways in which Alice and Bob do not receive adjacent colored keys is the total number of ways to distribute the keys minus the number of ways in which they do receive adjacent colored keys. This is $120 - 60 = \boxed{60}$.