System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
A family of six people are going to have dinner together. They have to sit around a circular table with six chairs. Each person has a different preference for who they want to sit next to. Here are some clues to help you figure out their preferences:

Anna wants to sit next to Ben and Eve.
Ben wants to sit next to Anna and Carl.
Carl wants to sit next to Ben and Dave.
Dave wants to sit next to Carl and Eve.
Eve wants to sit next to Dave and Anna.
Frank wants to sit next to anyone except Ben.
How can you arrange the seating so that everyone is happy? Write your answer using the following format: Person - Person - Person - Person - Person - Person

[Ground truth Answer]
Anna - Ben - Carl - Dave - Eve - Frank

[Assistant's Response]
To satisfy everyone's seating preferences around a circular table, we can arrange the seating as follows:

Anna - Ben - Carl - Dave - Eve - Frank

Here's how this arrangement meets everyone's preferences:

- Anna sits next to Ben and Eve.
- Ben sits next to Anna and Carl.
- Carl sits next to Ben and Dave.
- Dave sits next to Carl and Eve.
- Eve sits next to Dave and Anna.
- Frank sits next to Eve and Anna, ensuring he is not next to Ben.

This configuration ensures that all preferences are satisfied while respecting the circular nature of the table.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: