Hey, this is an English text. I want you to translate it into the Tunisian dialect. Please follow these steps:
1. Translate step by step and highlight differences between Tunisian dialect and Modern Standard Arabic.
2. Highlight sections you are confident translating into the Tunisian dialect.
Translate this text into the Tunisian dialect, focusing on capturing the essence of the language nuances:

Q: Git re-merge a file using another merge strategy option? I'm merging two branches with common ancestor: > [branch1] git merge branch2 --no-commit # ... did merging for several files with conflicts git merge branch2 -srecersive -Xignore-space-at-eol -- myfile.txt # not possible And I've resolved several merge conflicts in files which I wish to keep. Now there is a file with conflicts that are because of newline chars different. How can I make git to ignore newline chars conflicts and make another file with conflicts, with option ignore-space-at-eol of recursive strategy, ie. something like that git merge branch2 -srecursive -Xignore-space-at-eol -- myfilewithconflicts.txt. See picture. I can undo my merging of a file (git checkout -m myfilewithconflicts.txt) but how I apply another strategy to this file? A: Unfortunately, you can't. Once you are in the middle of a conflicted merge, you must either finish that merge, or abort it entirely, to start another merge. Neither is what you want here ("finish and start a new one" can get you there, but it is convoluted and error-prone). Git really should have a "suspend merge" tool to let you do this in a cleaner way. It might be possible to write one, but I don't have the time to do it. Why this is so (long) Let's start with some background. The problem at this point has been reduced to doing three-way merges on individual files—but how did we get here? A typical Git merge—or more precisely, what I have taken to calling a true merge, as opposed to the not-really-a-merge "fast forward" operation that's mainly just done as if via git checkout or git reset --hard—uses three inputs. You specify one of these inputs, the --theirs commit. The other two are implicit: they are the current or --ours commit, and the merge base as computed by your merge strategy. The default strategy for this kind of merge is the one you chose in both example commands, -s recursive. The goal of this kind of merge is to combine work. The merge base commit serves as the common starting point from which you (on your branch, --ours) did some work, and they (on their branch, --theirs) did some work, which Git should now combine. Since you both started from the same commit, this makes the combining easier: Git can run a git diff from the merge base to your commit to see what you did, and a second git diff from the merge base to their commit to see what they did. Having run these two diff commands (or the internal equivalent of them), Git can then pair up every base file with one file in your commit, and with one file in their commit. Doing the diff and pairing the files is all done as part of the merge strategy, but it's not yet finished: this process simply reduces the problem, down to the point of now having to combine work for each group of files. Ignoring tricky cases like new files,