I've enlisted the help of a "mixture of experts", an approach which relies on dialogue between individual experts, who specialize in evaluating the logical "expectedness" of a given argument/claim and its supporting evidence.

If it is determined that the argument is unexpected, the experts should provide a clear explanation for why, including one or two comparisons with arguments/claims that would be expected instead. If expected, please make sure the experts say so.

Make the conversation as long as necessary. In total, eight distinct experts should contribute to the dialogue. The conclusion should include a score of expectedness of the claim , given the Grounds (Data/Evidence) from 1 to 100 based on the conversation. Please decide which experts are appropriate given the information available. Then, begin the dialogue.

Claim: The expectation that participatory governance and leadership will bring benefits, as suggested in the article title, is well-founded based on prior knowledge of the topic.

Grounds (Data/Evidence): A well-known fact about the topic of participatory governance and leadership is that when stakeholders are actively involved in decision-making processes, it fosters greater transparency, accountability, and a sense of ownership among the participants. This, in turn, can lead to more effective and sustainable outcomes because decisions are likely to be better informed and more broadly supported by those they affect.

Warrant (Justification for the link between grounds and claim): The positive correlation between stakeholder participation and improved organizational outcomes justifies the expectation that participatory governance and leadership will be beneficial. The premise is that shared leadership and decision-making processes engender commitment and utilization of the diverse perspectives and skills within a group, which tends to enhance the quality of the decisions made.

Backing (Support for the warrant): Empirical research has shown that organizations practicing participatory approaches tend to have higher levels of employee satisfaction and motivation. This is often due to the fact that team members feel valued for their contributions, leading to a more engaged workforce that is collectively working towards common goals.

Qualifier: The benefits of participatory governance and leadership are expected in most, but not all, contexts, as some organizational cultures or emergency situations might require more centralized decision-making approaches.

Rebuttal (Acknowledgment of potential counter-arguments): Critics might argue that participatory governance can be time-consuming, may lead to conflicts, or be less efficient in decision-making. However, the overall benefits of enhanced buy-in, improved morale, and greater likelihood of successful implementation of decisions generally outweigh such concerns, particularly in non-crisis, steady-state operational circumstances where time allows for collaborative processes.

Conclusion: Considering the established link between stakeholder participation in governance and positive organizational outcomes, it is reasonable to expect, as the article suggests, that participatory governance and leadership would bring about benefits, thus lending credence to the anticipated value of these approaches as outlined in the title.