I want you to paraphrase the following information with zero pligarism 
( 
 George Orwell's "Down and Out in Paris and London"

"Down and Out in Paris and London" is a journal by George Orwell, first distributed in 1933. The book describes Orwell's encounters living among the down and out in both Paris and London during the last part of the 1920s. Part I - Paris: Orwell depicts his time filling in as a dishwasher in the kitchens of different Parisian lodgings and eateries. He subtleties the cruel working circumstances, the double-dealing of the kitchen staff, and the battles to earn enough to get by on small wages. The account uncovered the horrid real factors of neediness, hunger, and the dubious presence of those on the edges of society. Part II - London: The second piece of the journal movements to Orwell's encounters as a vagrant in London. He reports the difficulties of vagrancy, depending on relaxed work, and exploring the perplexing universe of London's down and out populace. Orwell gives distinctive depictions of the asylums, food lines, and the dehumanizing effect of neediness. Examination of Characters in "Out for the count in Paris and London": The characters in Orwell's diary are not fictionalized yet rather genuine individuals he experienced during his time living on the edges of society: George Orwell: Storyteller and Hero: Orwell relates his own encounters, utilizing the first-individual story to give a crude and unfiltered depiction of life among the ruined in Paris and London. Boris: Russian Colleague: In the Paris segment, Boris is an individual dishwasher and a companion of Orwell. His encounters feature the different foundations of those participated in low-wage, modest work in the eatery business. Paddy: Old Drifter: In the London area, Paddy is a more seasoned and experienced tramp who turns into Orwell's manual for the universe of vagrancy. Paddy's accounts and intelligence shed light on the battles of those living in the city. Charlie: Orwell's Brief Flat mate: Charlie is a buddy Orwell experiences during his hiking encounters in London. His personality adds a layer of kinship and divided difficulty between the down and out. Basic Article on "Out for the count in Paris and London": Title: "George Orwell's 'Out for the count in Paris and London': A Sympathetic Look into the Profundities of Destitution" Distributed in 1933, George Orwell's "Done for in Paris and London" stays a powerful investigation of neediness, imbalance, and the human soul's flexibility despite dejection. Orwell's story rises above the customary limits of journal, offering perusers a singing scrutinize of cultural designs and an empathetic depiction of those consigned to the edges. Orwell's choice to drench himself in the existences of the desperate fills in as a strong demonstration of compassion. Through striking and determined writing, he rejuvenates the battles of the kitchen laborers in Paris and the drifters in London. The characters, however genuine people, become prime examples addressing the innumerable others confronting comparable difficulties. The initial segment of the journal uncovered the double-dealing and dehumanization of laborers in the Parisian eatery industry. Orwell's collaborator Boris turns into an image of the different foundations from which people end up caught in a pattern of neediness. The account reveals insight into the fundamental issues that sustain such circumstances, moving perusers to defy the frequently undetectable existences of the individuals who work in the background. In the subsequent part, Orwell's encounters as a vagrant in London give an unmistakable depiction of vagrancy and the difficulties of making due in the city. Characters like Paddy and Charlie become courses for Orwell's investigation of the common fellowship and shared help that arise among the desperate. "Done for in Paris and London" is in excess of an individual record; a social discourse studies the cultural designs adding to neediness and underestimation. Orwell's work turns into a source of inspiration, encouraging perusers to perceive the humankind in those frequently disregarded by society and to face the fundamental issues that sustain imbalance. All in all, "Done for in Paris and London" remains as a demonstration of Orwell's obligation to truth-telling and civil rights. The journal stays a fundamental work that prompts perusers to draw in with the human expense of destitution, testing assumptions and rousing sympathy. Orwell's merciful look into the profundities of neediness keeps on resounding, helping us to remember the continuous basic to resolve the foundational issues that propagate imbalance and minimization.

 ) 
to create an interesting article,
suitable for my blog,Try to make the article seems as if it was written 
by human hands not AI, and attractive, 
and convincing, and interesting to the reader, 
and try to make the language more accessible to the reader. 
considering the article's ranking on Google,
Considering the average confusion and explosion scores,
Predictability when it comes to placement and display,
making the keywords in all the paragraphs clearer,
Make a sub-heading for each paragraph.
Try to extend that information,
PROVIDED THAT THE ARTICLE’S WORDS must be BETWEEN 3000 AND 4000 WORDS, 
with the Attempt to make the article appropriate 
and compatible with Search engine optimization (SEO) 
to obtain a high ranking in Google search.
And then provide me with the search description that 
must be not more than 150 charachters.