How would a Christian refute the following disproofs of the existence of God? «1.	Critias hypothesis disproof	Per the logic that (a) “gods” are an invention of lawgivers of ancient times, employed to as kind of overseers of the right and wrong actions of men (Critias, c.410BC), which became reduced to the logic that (b) the universe must be governed by a single “god”, and NOT the product of the whims of many gods, each governing its own province according to his own laws (Melvin Calvin, 1969), which became reduced to the logic that (c) if all the phenomena of motion follow from one set of principles (Morris Kline, 1982) then of the phenomenon of human motion follow from the set of principles of chemical thermodynamics where there is NO god (or gods), then god, by repercussion, does not exist.	This logic is the basis of zerotheism.	

2.	God's work disproof	That the ancient saying that the “lord works in mysterious ways” (Isaiah 45:15), has now been superseded and thereby supplanted by “work” explained thermodynamically makes the supposition of the existence of a "supernatural power" (higher power), thereby null, invalid, and superfluous.	See: Beg-Thims dialogue for specifics.	

3.	Aluminum disproof	 That god said (Gen 2:7) he created man from a mixture of clay (“Adam” is Hebrew for clay) and divine breath or spirit (Eve is Hebrew for breath or spirit), and that the primary elements of clay (see: clay creation myth) are: aluminum, silicon, and oxygen, but that humans, according to mass composition (see: human molecular formula), are not comprised of aluminum, proves that god does not exist.	 First pointed out by Alfred Lotka (1925).

4.	Afterlife does not exist argument
(aka "eternal life argument")	 If, per disproof #5, namely: life does not exist, meaning that “moving creatures” are but powered atomic geometries, neither alive nor dead, but correctly existing in prolonged states of trajectory-based animation, then, per corollary, “afterlife” (i.e. eternal life), the assumed post-cessation state of existence, in the abode of god, does not exist, i.e. eternal life constitutes perpetual motion, therefore god does not exist.	

5.	Life does not exist argument	That god said (Gen 1:20) he created “moving creatures that have life”, on the fifth day of creation, but that, as science finds, “life does not exist” (see: defunct theory of life), e.g. as stated by Nikola Tesla: “there is no thing endowed with life” (1916), as concluded by Crick: “we should abandon the word alive” (1966), or as evidenced by experiment, e.g. Miller-Urey experiment (1952), proves that god does not exist.	That "life", similar to the now defunct concepts of ether, caloric, or phlogiston, etc., does not exist, as either a property nor measureable or conceptual entity, as been independently deduced by Libb Thims (2009), Alfred Rogers (2010), and Ferris Jabr (2013).	

6.	Moral symbols argument	That morality in nature explained by the symbols and laws of physical chemistry and not based on the laws of the Bible, proves that god does not exist.	First pointed out by Goethe: “Science shows that what is moral or amoral in nature is found, not in the Bible, but in the reaction symbols of physical chemistry.”
— Johann Goethe (1809/30), “Conversation with Riemer and Zelter” 

7.	Existence of evil argument	That “evil” exists, e.g. Hitler was born, natural catastrophes occur, etc., proves that god does not exist; Francis Bradley (1893) stated the problem thusly: [8]

“The trouble has come from the idea that the Absolute [God] is a moral person. I you start from that basis, then the relation of evil to the Absolute [God] presents at once an irreducible dilemma. The problem then becomes insoluble, but not because it is obscure or in any way mysterious. To anyone who has the sense and courage to see things as they are, and is resolved not to mystify others or himself, there is really no question to discuss. The dilemma is plainly insoluble because it is based on a clear self-contradiction.”
First stated by Epicurus and his circa 270BC “problem of evil” argument; ; scholars such as John Mill (“Theology”, 1874) and Francis Bradley (Appearance and Reality, 1893) (Ñº), stated that the existence of perfectly moral, perfectly good, omnipotent (all-powerful), omniscient (all-knowing) god, on one hand, and the existence of evil, on the other, is an insoluble self-contradiction. 

8.	Free will argument	That soul (or karma) theory is based on the assumed existence of free will, but that science finds that free will doesn't exist, e.g. Libet experiment, proves that god does not exist.	

9.	Imperfect world argument
(aka "argument from undesign" or the "disteleolgy" objection)	 Thinkers such as Kenneth Miller, Richard Dawkins, and George Williams, have decried the eye's structure as poorly or "stupidly" designed, supposing there were an "intelligent designer", in terms of neural wiring, light scattering, and retina position; as Lee Strobel put it to Stephen Meyer: [105] 
“If there is a designer, doesn’t the botched eye design prove he’s not really that intelligent? [doesn't exist]”
The following atomic theory based statement by Lucretius, from his De rerum natura (5.198–9), according to C.S. Lewis (1955):

“Had God designed the world, it would not be a world so frail and faulty as we see.”


10.	Evolution argument	That god said (Gen 1:20-27) he “created” humans and animals, in their present form, on a particular day, some 5,000-years ago, but that fossil record, DNA evidence, morphology studies, chemical origins, etc., shows that humans "evolved", morphed, or were chemical synthesized over time, from hydrogen atom precursors, over the last 13.8-billion years, proves that god does not exist.	Made famous by Darwin’s The Origin of Species (1859); the biggest blow to religion since atomic theory.	

11.	Heart prayer study 	The 2006 Heart Prayer Study (Ñº), which found that those prayed for faired “worse”, following coronary artery bypass surgery, than those not prayed for, proves that god does not exist.	

12.	Glowing olive oil disproof
(Infinite energy disproof)	Muslim's equate Allah (God) to ever-glowing olive oil, in a dark cave, i.e. energy infinite (Noorun Ala Noor) 	Infinite energy as well as light-emitting oil is thermodynamically impossible, i.e. a perpetual motion theory; that proves that God does not exist; 
13.	Earth moves argument	That the Bible, i.e. the revealed word of gods, says that the earth is immobile, e.g. “the world is established and cannot be moved” (Psalms 93:1; Book of Isaiah 23), and at the center of the universe, but that science finds that the earth does move and is not the center of the universe, proves that god does not exist.	Italian physicist Galileo Galilei was tried in 1633 and convicted for pointing out this issue (Ñº), made to recant, and put under house arrest. 

13.	Religious disagreement argument	That there are so-many religions, with so many gods, and inconsistencies and disagreement on points, proves that god does not exist.	

14.	Blood bath argument	The number of people killed in the name of god proves that god does not exist.	

15.	Hypothesis by default argument	That the existence of “god” is but an hypothesis, with no evidence in its favor, and thereby never verified as true, is proof by default that god does not exist.	Dismissed as an unneeded hypothesis by Pierre Laplace, in 1802 (see: Napoleon Laplace anecdote), in respect to the operation of the universe.	

16.	Mythology argument	That Christianity, Islam, Hinduism, and the other residual religions, which constitute 75 percent of the world's beliefs, are based on mythology (see: religio-mythology transcription and syncretism), and that myths aren't real, proves that god is not real, and therefore does not exist.	

17.	Materialism argument	That all that exists is but “atoms and void” (Leucippus, 450BC) or “fermions and bosons” (Dirac, 1945), all else being but "opinion" (Democritus, 370BC) or metaphysical speculation (Lewis, 1925), proves that god does not exist.	

18.	Argument from ignorance
(Hippocratic reductionism)	Based on the historical progressive tendency to de-divine a previously once-considered mysterious natural phenomena, e.g. “lightening” was once attributed to the god Thor, but now understood as the result of an electromagnetic potential difference between the clouds and the sky, or mysterious human phenomena, e.g. “love” was once attributed to the god Cupid, but now understood as a purely chemical reaction, once its physical or chemical workings are understood, it is assumed, by future extension, that the gods will eventually be worked out of all phenomena, and therefore, by reasoned conclusion, god does not exist.	Several alternative statements of the argument exist, such as:

“Men think epilepsy divine, merely because they do not understand it. We will one day understand what causes it, and then cease to call it divine. And so it is with everything in the universe.”
— Hippocrates (370BC)

“My object is to dispel the fear of the gods, which arises simply from the fact that there are so many things which men do not yet understand, and therefore imagine to be effected by divine power.”
— Lucretius (55BC)

19.	No one's ever seen him
(aka lack of evidence argument)	That "god" has never been seen, observed, measured, tested, and or quantified, in such a way as to provide empirical verifiable evidence, proves that such an entity does not exist.	»