You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


BOULDER — It didn't take long for new Colorado coach Mel Tucker to put his stamp on his first recruiting class with the Buffs.

Tucker welcomed the signing of 17 players on Wednesday, the first day recruits could put their names on national letters of intent in the early signing period. The group includes 12 high school players, four junior college transfers and one graduate transfer, representing eight states, one U.S. territory and one European country (Austria).

But much more telling than the geographical representation is the position breakdown: the latest CU recruiting class includes eight linemen — four offensive and four defensive — with the majority of them at or near the 300-pound mark.

Tucker's intentions are clear.

"We have to get stout in the trenches," he said during a brief break Wednesday morning. "We wanted to get bigger. We want to be able to run the ball on our terms on offense and we need to be able to stop the run on defense. Both of those things start with the offensive and defensive lines."

The Buffs appear to have found the players to fit those needs. Two of the junior college players are already listed above 300 pounds, including Modesto JC offensive lineman Va'atofu Sauvao (320) and Hinds CC defensive lineman Janaz Jordan (305). Also already at or near the 300-pound mark from the high school ranks are defensive linemen Austin Williams (320) and Na'im Rodman (295), along with offensive linemen Austin Johnson (285), Valentin Senn (290) and Jake Wiley (270). Meanwhile, JC transfer defensive lineman Jeremiah Doss is currently listed at 260, but added 40 pounds in his first year at college and coaches believe he has room for more weight on his 6-4 frame.

Along with adding some muscle up front, the Buffs also added help at other positions. Wednesday's list includes two running backs, a receiver and a tight end on the offensive side of the ball, as well as three linebackers and two defensive backs.

"We identified some needs and addressed them," Tucker said.

Wednesday marked Tucker's two-week anniversary on the job, a period that has been a virtual whirlwind. He hosted recruits in Boulder his first two weekends on the job, and also spent as much time as possible on the road meeting with players who had already committed as well as new recruits.

"We had to hit the ground running," Tucker said. "We know where the good players are. We had some guys committed, and we wanted to secure those commitments and we wanted to add to those guys. I thought our staff did a really good job of going out, being aggressive, selling our school, selling our program, selling our vision. … We were going a hundred miles an hour, trying to make sure we saw as many good players as we could."

Some other notes and quick analyses of the latest class:

EARLY ENROLLEES: Eight of the 17 players who signed Wednesday are expected to enroll at CU in time for the spring semester, which will give them the chance to participate in spring ball. That includes five high school players — running backs Joe Davis and Jaren Mangham , offensive lineman Austin Johnson , linebacker Alec Pell and defensive back K.J. Trujillo — along with JC transfers Jeremiah Doss (defensive line) and Sauvao, and Auburn grad transfer Jalen Harris (tight end).

Sauvao played at Modesto JC, the same program that produced current Buffs defensive lineman Mustafa Johnson , and two of the junior college signees, Janaz Jordan and Doss, will arrive as sophomores and will have three years of eligibility remaining.

GRAD TRANSFER: Harris will be the second grad transfer in as many years for Colorado, following running back Travon McMillian last season. Tucker is familiar with Harris, as he saw him three times in the last four years as Georgia's defensive coordinator.

"He's an excellent player," Tucker said. "He's got great size, he's an excellent blocker, he's got really soft hands and he's a mature guy. Very instinctive, a leader and a team guy. He fills an immediate need for us at the tight end position."

Tucker also stressed that he wants to make tight end a bigger focus in CU's offense. Last year, Buffs tight ends caught just six passes for 56 yards.

"We really need to use the tight end," Tucker said. "The tight end, when used properly, can give the defense fits. That's what we sold Jalen on."

IN-STATE SIGNEES: Wednesday's list included four Colorado prep products: running back Joe Davis (Valor Christian), offensive lineman Austin Johnson (Highlands Ranch), linebacker Alec Pell (Cherry Creek) and offensive lineman Jake Wiley (Eaglecrest).

"It's critically important that we keep those guys here," Tucker said. "We want to keep the best players in the state here at this university. These guys that are in this state, they grew up as Buffs. They've grown up all their lives wanting to play here. We've identified those guys as guys that can help us win championships and it was important that we went out and go sign those guys."

GRAYSHIRT FROM 2018: While he doesn't count toward this year's recruiting class, the Buffs will also welcome linebacker Joshka Gustav to campus this spring. Gustav, from Cherry Valley, Calif., was a signee last year but delayed his enrollment until the 2019 spring semester.

QUICK HITS: Coaches say junior college transfer linebacker Jash Allen , a converted tailback, is in the mold of current Buffs outside linebacker Davion Taylor , with excellent closing speed and explosiveness. He was rated by 247Sports as the No. 6 JC player in the country. … Coaches think defensive back Mark Perry can play several positions in the secondary. A 6-0, 195-pounder, one assistant said he is a physical player who has Chidobe Awuzie -type skills. … One of the highest-rated players in the class is wide receiver Braedin Huffman-Dixon from Mater Dei High School in California. A top-50 receiver in the nation, coaches say he has the speed to get downfield in a hurry and the ball skills to go up and make tough catches. … The Buffs plucked a pair of players from Michigan — running back Jaren Mangham and linebacker Marvin Ham II . Both are four-star prospects. Mangham is a big — 6-2, 215 pounds — back who has speed and power while Ham is a player coaches believe has the speed and size to be an inside or outside rusher.

ONE MORE SIGNING DAY: While the early December signing day is now the headliner, it's worth remembering there is still a February 6 signing day on the horizon. If the current list of signees stays at 17, CU could sign six to eight more in February.

Contact: <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>