You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Update May 22, 2018—Public engagement Phase 1 summary available now.

The City of Winnipeg (the City) is committed to building pedestrian and cycling infrastructure for people of all ages and abilities. Through this study, a preliminary design for a new pedestrian and cycling bridge over the Assiniboine River will be developed to connect Osborne Village to Downtown via McFadyen Park on the north side of the river and Fort Rouge Park on the south side of the river. Considerations for this project include pedestrian and cycling connectivity throughout Osborne Village to Osborne Rapid Transit Station, Norwood Bridge, bike lanes on Nassau Street, and the riverwalk, upgrades to both McFadyen Park and Fort Rouge Park, crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED), and riverbank stabilization.

Go to Public Engagement Projects Listing

Engage Update October 2018: As the project team continues to refine project designs, Lewis Street and part of an adjacent back lane have been newly identified as a potential cycling connection. View the notice under the documents tab. At this time, we are reaching out to residents and businesses along this newly identified connection to ensure they are aware of the study and have an opportunity to contact the City of Winnipeg with any further questions. Before cycling connections are recommended, the project team wants to ensure local input is considered. This route was not identified in previous phases of the project because connections to Fort Rouge Park were developed after considering public input on other major routes along River Avenue and Stradbrook Avenue. Next Steps Throughout summer 2018, the project team will finalize the recommended functional design of cycling connections and preliminary design of the bridge and parks. These designs will be submitted for Council consideration following completion of the designs. A detailed design phase will be required ahead of project construction. Funding for detailed design and construction will be contingent on Council approval. A final public engagement report will be available on this project site in fall 2018. A public public engagement summary outlining what we heard during Phase 1 and how it was incorporated into the latest designs is now available under the documents tab. For project inquiries please contact <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS> or 204-986-4243. Sign up for project updates by joining our mailing list. Phase 2 The second phase of engagement was held from May to June 2018 and included stakeholder interviews and a meeting, an online survey, a park visit and a public workshop. Phase 2 was the final round of public engagement before completing the preliminary design of the bridge and parks and the functional design of the pedestrian and cycling connections. The project team is currently processing what we heard and will incorporate input wherever possible during the design process. During Phase 2 engagement, we were seeking feedback on: Three bridge design concepts, one of which will be further developed to a full preliminary design level.

Proposed park concepts for Fort Rouge and McFadyen Parks.

Proposed north-south and east-west pedestrian and cycling connections throughout Osborne Village. Thank you to the 53 people who joined us for a public workshop on June 5, 2018 and the 680 people who took time to fill out the online survey Feedback shared with the project team is currently being analyzed. Participants in the process will have an opportunity to see how their feedback was considered in a final public engagement report in the fall of 2018. Phase 1 The first phase of engagement was held from December 2017 to March 2018 and included stakeholder interviews and a meeting, an online survey, community feedback boxes, informative warming huts, a pop-up event and a public workshop. Read the public engagement summary to learn about how we used your Phase 1 feedback to develop conceptual designs. If you would like to stay updated on City of Winnipeg public engagement events, follow the City on Facebook and Twitter or sign up for the City of Winnipeg public engagement newsletter.

Updates-Bridge Using the public feedback received in early 2018, the project team developed three bridge concepts for further public input. Based on what we heard, the following attributes apply to all three bridge concepts: Each bridge provides a safe and efficient pedestrian and cycling connection. The design is intended for mixed-use between pedestrians and cyclists, sharing the space equally without vehicle traffic. The lack of barriers would allow pedestrians to cross to appreciate the view from each side of the bridge.

A 5.0 m bridge width was selected in accordance with engineering guidelines to provide sufficient space for pedestrians and cyclists (including wheelchair users) to share the space. This also allows enough space for snow clearing vehicles. Note, sidewalks along Osborne Street Bridge are 2.5 m wide, while the Esplanade Riel pedestrian bridge has a similar sidewalk clearance to the proposed bridge deck at 5.0 m wide. Each bridge concept has at least one area where the bridge deck widens from 5.0 m to 7.0 m to create one or more overlook areas.

The bridge widths and bridge approaches through the parks (and to and from bike paths/the roads beyond the parks) will be designed to reduce potential collisions. Appropriate signage will be installed to advise cyclists to slow down. Bridge surfaces will be designed as best possible to be comfortable and safe for cyclists, all types of pedestrians, in all seasons.

A bridge architect is a key member of the design team, tasked with providing elegant, aesthetically pleasing design features for each bridge concept.

The bridge will be designed to have gradual vertical slopes and approaches in accordance with standards from the City's Accessibility guidelines. This means that all users (cyclists, pedestrians, people in wheelchairs, people with strollers, etc.) will be able to safely use the new bridge. Accessible ramps will be constructed to provide access for people of all ages and abilities from the bridge down to the Riverwalk on the McFadyen Park side. Accessible ramps will also be constructed to provide access for people of all ages and abilities from the bridge down to a potential/future water dock on the Fort Rouge Park side.

The bridge will be designed to accommodate pedestrians, cyclists, snow clearing equipment, and large groups of people (i.e. on Canada Day to watch the fireworks at The Forks). The clearance under the bridge will be designed in accordance with navigable waters requirements for boats and above flood protection levels. This will allow for year-round use of the structure.

The bridge railing will be designed to a height and with features safe for pedestrians and cyclists. It will not obscure the view from the bridge.

Safety is a key aspect of the bridge concepts. There will not be any areas for someone to hide behind on the bridge and the bridge will not be covered. Adequate lighting will be provided on the bridge and off the bridge through the Parks to improve safety. Careful consideration will be given to provide safe lighting to help make the bridge safe and to make the bridge aesthetically beautiful, but to reduce light pollution. Increased public usage of this space will also increase safety. Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) principles will apply.

Consideration will be taken with respect to environmental impact. The bridge options will be developed to not include any in-stream piers (columns) in order to reduce impact on the river habitat, and prevent ice jams in the spring, as well as allow for uninterrupted river flow.

Some trees will need to be removed for construction of riverbank stabilization, to allow access to construct the bridge, and to build accessible ramps extending to the Riverwalk. The design team is working to minimize the impact on existing, especially mature trees. New trees will be planted in locations surrounding the new park infrastructure. Similarly, lighting will be designed for safety but there will be an effort to minimize light pollution.

The bridge concepts include no in-stream piers (columns), such as in the middle in the river. This is a more aesthetically pleasing design.

All three bridge options are conceptually designed on a skewed alignment to the Assiniboine River to connect to each park at the most suitable location and to avoid a shallow underground high voltage Manitoba Hydro line that cannot be moved. Bridge Option 1: Girder Bridge Key attributes specific to Bridge Option 1: Girder Bridge This is a straight bridge which crosses the Assiniboine River at a skew angle. There are two areas of the bridge that gradually expand to 7.0 m wide overlook points. This bridge can be made more aesthetically beautiful with lighting and artistic features. This bridge features a unique shallow girder design intended to present a slender modern look to the structure. This bridge option presents the least cost option, compared to Option 2: Cable-Stayed Bridge, and Option 3: Suspension Bridge. Bridge Option 2: Cable-Stayed Bridge Key attributes specific to Bridge Option 2: Cable-Stayed Bridge Landmark double curved bridge: Could attract visitors (as there are very few curvilinear cable-stayed bridges in North America, and this would be the first Canada).

Aesthetically unique as it allows someone on the bridge to see the other side of the bridge while crossing it.

The double curved feature may help to provide a better "connection to the parks" feeling.

The double curved feature will naturally help to slow down pedestrians and cyclists on the bridge (when compared to a straight bridge).

The double curved bridge mimics the meandering rivers and streets along rivers in Winnipeg. The centre of each of the two bridge curves gradually expands to a 7.0 m wide overlook point. A long bench is built in to each of the inner curves. This bridge has two angled towers (near each end/abutment) that the cables connect to. This option is more expensive than Option 1: Girder Bridge and is comparable in price to Option 3: Suspension Bridge. The cable stays on each curved side will project shadows on the water resembling rays on sunny days. The bridge cables allow for the inclusion of artistic lighting above the bridge. Bridge Option 3: Suspension Bridge Key attributes specific to Bridge Option 3: Suspension Bridge Landmark straight bridge: Could attract visitors (as there are no suspension bridges in Winnipeg). This is a straight bridge which crosses the Assiniboine River at a skew angle. The centre of the bridge gradually expands to a 7.0 m wide overlook point. This bridge has two piers at each end from which cables are suspended from. The piers will be located on the riverbanks and the suspension cables strung between them will resemble two separated spaces now connected and held together by the new structure. This option is more expensive than Option 1: Girder Bridge and is comparable in price to Option 2: Cable-Stayed Bridge. The bridge piers and cables allow for the inclusion of artistic lighting above the bridge. What do you think works well or doesn't work well within each bridge concept? For more information on how to provide feedback visit the engage tab. At this point in the design process, the project team is collecting public feedback and working to select the preferred bridge option. The overall bridge architecture and engineering designs are being investigated to ensure the bridge can physically be constructed and will look a certain way/give a certain feel. Design items that are not explored at this level of design (but that will be explored in the future) are: Details of the dock location, size, elevation, and aesthetics.

Details of what the riding/walking surface of the bridge will look like.

Details of what the signage and wayfinding on the bridge, in the parks, and on the active transportation paths will look like.

Details of the active transportation path pavement markings, details, and colours.

Updates-Parks Using the public feedback received in early 2018, the project team has developed a conceptual design for Fort Rouge and McFadyen Parks to receive further public input. Themes have been suggested, such as naturalized playground components that could represent the larger wild 'river bank' environment in a safe and manageable way, while facilitating imaginative and explorative play. However, specific details of the parks are not explored at this level of design. This means that specific details of the play equipment, plaza / seating areas, splash pads, and vegetation have not yet been determined. Fort Rouge Park is one of Winnipeg’s first parks, celebrating its 125th year in 2018. The new design respects and works within the historic trail pattern, while recommending upgrades to the ageing playground equipment, and a significant expansion and upgrade to the popular spray pad, which was nearing its full capacity and will now be servicing neighbourhoods on both sides of the river. McFadyen Park redevelopment is aimed at improving the most popular elements such as the playground and tennis courts, grouping them and bringing them closer to the street for enhanced vibrancy and ease of access. The new bridge connection essentially creates one larger park, so residents from both sides have more options for recreation. Underutilized or ageing facilities like the wading pool are in most cases replaced or reconfigured in a new location within the two parks. Fort Rouge Park Changes in proposed park updates What is being removed: Bollards and chain fence along River Avenue.

Wood park sign.

Some trees along riverbank. Note: the design team is working to minimize tree loss, especially of mature trees, and new trees will be planted. Proposed additions: Improved park street-front appearance with ornamental fencing and contemporary park signs. Fence will also act as a safety feature, providing a barrier between the park and River Avenue.

New 3.5 m wide multi-use path ‘loop‘ over existing path connecting the pedestrian bridge to River Avenue.

New bike parking to accommodate bike traffic and make the park a destination point for users of all ages.

New accessible path and ramp to provide barrier-free access to dock at river.

New river edge dock for fishing, canoe launch, potential water taxi stop in summer and access to river trail in winter.

New rip-rap to enhance riverbank stabilization and help mitigate future erosion.

Upgraded and expanded spray pad to accommodate new users crossing over the bridge from McFadyen Park.

Upgrades to three playgrounds with new structures and naturalized play. Structures could include: swing sets, slides, climbing bars etc. to replace ageing / dated equipment. Natural play components could include items such as: plants, logs, water, sand, mud, climbing boulders, hills and trees.

All current light fixtures will remain and lights will be added to the accessible ramp and dock.

New tree planting to enhance new park features and to achieve no net loss of trees on site.

Relocation of granular pathway to gate chamber. McFadyen Park Changes in proposed park updates What is being removed: Wading pool.

Washroom building.

Bollards and chain fence along Assiniboine Avenue.

Wood park sign.

Seating area at stairs.

Some trees along riverbank. Note: the design team is working to minimize tree loss, especially of mature trees, and new trees will be planted. Proposed additions: Improved park street-front appearance with low fencing and new park sign and commemorative monument. The fence will also deter children from running across Assiniboine Avenue.

New 3.5 m wide multi-use path connecting the pedestrian bridge to Assiniboine Avenue and the existing bike lane.

Street front plaza that provides an active space closer to the street for better surveillance and street presence, acts as a traffic calming mechanism for cyclists and pedestrians moving among the playgrounds and tennis courts, separates bridge access from river access, provides shade trees with planters for ample rooting space, and opportunities to sit and watch the surrounding activities.

New expanded playground with seating areas, structures and naturalized play. Structures could be items such as: swing sets, slides, climbing bars etc. Natural play components could include items such as plants, logs, water, sand, climbing boulders, hills and trees.

New bike parking to encourage lingering and make the park a destination point for users of all ages.

New accessible path and ramp to provide barrier-free access to the Assiniboine Riverwalk.

Re-configuration and upgrading of tennis courts to include new surface and fencing.

Retain existing stairs and upgrade to meet Accessibility Standards.

Lighting will be added to the pathways leading to the pedestrian bridge and the accessible ramp to the riverbank.

New tree planting to enhance new park features and to achieve no net loss of trees on site. What do you think works well or doesn’t work well within the parks concept? For more information on how to provide feedback visit the engage tab.

Updates-AT Connections Update October 2018: Further information about the newly proposed Lewis Street and back lane cycling connection is available under the documents tab. Proposed Active Transportation connections These cycling routes have been developed with direction from The City of Winnipeg’s Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies, analysis of public feedback during the first round of public engagement and technical analysis by WSP and the City of Winnipeg’s Public Works department. One or more of the following connections will be further developed to a functional design level. Further refinements of the route(s) will be determined at a later date. We are currently seeking feedback on the following routes and road treatment options: Route A – Nassau Street, Roslyn Road, Bryce Street Nassau Street – Modify Existing Neighbourhood Greenway Converts Nassau Street to northbound one-way street for vehicular traffic and two-way for cyclists between Roslyn Road and River Avenue by adding a curb extension at Nassau Street and Roslyn Road.

The addition of a curb extension to make Nassau a one-way street for vehicles will remove the high volume of southbound cut-through traffic, improving comfort and safety for cyclists and pedestrians on this existing route.

This conversion to a one-way street between Roslyn Road and River Avenue will also allow for the space required to incorporate back-in, angled parking, which would increase the amount of on-street parking.

This is a low cost option.

Snow will continue to be cleared by street snow plowing machinery. Roslyn Road west of Osborne Street, Option –1 - Raised Bike Lanes Raised bike lanes would provide the highest degree of separation possible between cyclists and vehicular traffic in this space-constrained location.

Adding raised bike lanes changes north-side parking to a bike lane but maintains the accessible loading zone in front of Fitness Physiotherapy.

This option would be more costly than option 2 (buffered bike lanes).

Snow is cleared from bike lane by sidewalk plowing machinery. Roslyn Road west of Osborne Street, Option 2 - Buffered Bike Lanes Adding buffered bike lanes changes north-side parking to bike lane but maintains the accessible loading zone in front of Fitness Physiotherapy.

Bike lane and painted buffer are at the minimum acceptable width (1.8m total -including bike lane and buffer).

Snow will continue to be cleared by street snow plowing machinery.

This option is less costly than option 1 (raised bike lanes). Roslyn Road east of Osborne Street and Bryce Street north of River Ave - Neighbourhood Greenway Range of treatments to slow down, divert and calm traffic (for example: speed humps, traffic diverters, curb extensions) to improve pedestrian and cyclist safety.

Reduces short cutting traffic.

This is a low cost option.

Snow will continue to be cleared by street snow plowing machinery, making it easier to maintain. Route B - River Avenue and Stradbrook Street River Avenue west of Osborne Street, Option 1- Protected Bike Lane Travel lanes and parking lane configuration remain the same but are narrowed within acceptable widths to accommodate the bike lane.

This route provides direct connectivity to destinations in Osborne Village, the proposed walk bike bridge, and provides a direct east-west route through the neighbourhood.

This route allows for this design to be extended to Wellington Ave in the future, which is a direction from the Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies.

The first round of public engagement revealed that a bike lane on River Avenue is highly desirable (online survey found 458 people in support of route, 56 not in support).

Snow is cleared by sidewalk plowing machinery. River Avenue west of Osborne Street, Option 2 - Raised Bike Lane Travel lanes and parking lane configuration remain the same but are narrowed within acceptable widths to accommodate the bike lane.

A raised bike lane is more costly than a protected lane but allows for high degree of separation between vehicular traffic and cyclists and wider travel lanes.

This route provides direct connectivity to destinations in Osborne Village, the proposed walk bike bridge, and provides a direct east-west route through the neighborhood.

This route allows for this design to be extended to Wellington Ave in the future, which is a direction from the Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies.

The first round of public engagement revealed that a bike lane on River Avenue is highly desirable (online survey found 458 people in support of route, 56 not in support).

Snow is cleared by sidewalk plowing machinery. River Avenue east of Osborne Street - Protected bike lane Bike lane is added to the north side of the street, shifting the layout of the road to maintain north-side parking lane and two one-way lanes of traffic. The southern parking lane is removed.

This route provides direct connectivity to destinations in Osborne Village, the proposed active walk bike bridge, and provides a direct route through the neighbourhood.

This route allows for this design to be extended to Wellington Ave in the future, which direction from the Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies.

The first round of public engagement revealed that a bike lane on River Avenue is highly desirable (online survey found 458 people in support of route, 56 not in support).

Snow is cleared by sidewalk plowing machinery. River Avenue east of Donald Street - Neighbourhood Greenway Range of treatments to slow down or divert vehicular traffic (speed humps, traffic diverters, curb extensions, etc.) Convenient connectivity to destinations, publicly desired route, easy to maintain, calms traffic for pedestrian and cyclist safety, reduces short cutting traffic, low cost.

The first round of public engagement revealed that River Avenue is highly desirable (online survey found 458 people in support of route, 56 not in support).

Snow will continue to be cleared by street snow plowing machinery. Stradbrook Avenue west of Osborne Street, Option 1 - Protected Bike Lane Travel lanes and parking lane configuration remain the same but are narrowed to accommodate the bike lane.

This route provides direct connectivity to destinations in Osborne Village, the proposed walk bike bridge, Harkness Station and provides a direct east-west route through the neighbourhood.

This route allows for this design to be extended to Wellington Ave in the future, which is a direction from the Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies.

The first round of public engagement revealed that a bike lane on Stradbrook Avenue is desirable (online survey found 363 people in support of route, 67 not in support).

Snow is cleared by sidewalk plowing machinery. Stradbrook Avenue west of Osborne Street, Option 2 - Raised Bike Lane Travel lanes and parking lane configuration remain the same but are narrowed to accommodate the bike lane.

Raised bike lane is more costly than a protected lane but allows for high degree of separation between vehicular traffic and cyclists and wider travel lanes.

This route provides direct connectivity to destinations in Osborne Village, the proposed walk bike bridge, Harkness Station and provides a direct east-west route through the neighbourhood.

This route allows for this design to be extended to Wellington Ave in the future, which is a direction from the Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies.

The first round of public engagement revealed that a bike lane on Stradbrook Avenue is desirable (online survey found 363 people in support of route, 67 not in support).

Snow is cleared by sidewalk plowing machinery. Stradbrook Avenue east of Osborne Street – Protected Bike Lane Travel lanes and parking lane configuration remain the same but are narrowed to accommodate the bike lane.

Parking changed from north lane to south side.

This route provides direct connectivity to destinations in Osborne Village, the proposed walk bike bridge, Harkness Station and provides a direct east-west route through the neighbourhood.

This route allows for this design to be extended to Wellington Ave in the future, which is a direction from the Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies.

The first round of public engagement revealed that a bike lane on Stradbrook Avenue is desirable (online survey found 363 people in support of route, 67 not in support).

Snow is cleared by sidewalk plowing machinery. Route C - Wardlaw Avenue - Neighbourhood Greenway Range of treatments to slow down, divert and calm traffic (speed humps, traffic diverters, curb extensions) for pedestrian and bike safety.

The existing perpendicular parking (which is highly irregular) east of Osborne Street would be changed to parallel street parking for cyclist safety and to accommodate a new sidewalk on the north side of the street.

Reduces short cutting traffic.

This is a low cost option.

Signalized crossing of Osborne Street already exists.

Snow will continue to be cleared by street snow plowing machinery. Route D - Gertrude Avenue - Neighbourhood Greenway Range of treatments to slow down, divert and calm traffic (speed humps, traffic diverters, curb extensions) for pedestrian and bike safety.

Reduces short cutting traffic.

Directly connects to Gladstone School and River Osborne Community Centre.

New signalized crossing would be required at Osborne Street to provide a safe and legal crossing for cyclists.

Snow will continue to be cleared by street snow plowing machinery. Route E - Scott Street Neighbourhood Greenway Range of treatments to slow down, divert and calm traffic (speed humps, traffic diverters, curb extensions) for pedestrian and bike safety.

This route provides connectivity between the bridge and the east and west routes.

The first round of public engagement revealed that a neighbourhood greenway on Scott Street was desirable(online survey found 409 people in support of route, 88 not in support).

Reduces short cutting traffic.

Snow will continue to be cleared by street snow plowing machinery. The cycling connections of this project will be study to a functional design level, which will requires another phase of design (preliminary design) and additional opportunities for public feedback. What do you think works well or doesn't work well with these proposed routes? For more information on how to provide feedback, visit the engage tab.

Background The City's Transportation Master Plan (TMP) presents a long-term strategy to guide the planning, development, renewal, and maintenance of Winnipeg’s transportation system. In 2015, City Council approved the Winnipeg Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies (PCS), which provide a long-range policy framework for active modes of transportation for the next 20 years. The City's Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies note that the Red River, Assiniboine River, and the rail corridors create significant barriers within the walking and cycling networks, creating challenges to those navigating Winnipeg on foot or bicycle. The Pedestrian and Cycling Strategies identifies the need for a new pedestrian and cycling crossing between McFadyen and Fort Rouge Parks along with priorities for new cycling routes in Osborne Village. The existing Osborne Street and Donald Street bridges do not provide all ages and abilities cycling connections across the Assiniboine River. A new bridge will provide a direct, safe and convenient connection for walking and cycling downtown across the river to the Osborne Rapid Transit Station and in the future to the Southwest Transitway multi-use path. It would additionally provide a safe and convenient connection between the north and south sides of the Assiniboine River. This crossing has the potential to be a landmark structure for Winnipeg. Key drivers include economy, functionality, constructability, architecture, and artistry. The City envisions an elegant and aesthetically pleasing, but cost effective structure. Creating connections between the wider transportation network includes a connection to Assiniboine Avenue on the north side of the river and to the Osborne Street Bus Rapid Transit Station, Nassau Street, and the Norwood Bridge on the south side. The public engagement and design process will seek feedback on current use, values, and opportunities for improvements while also assessing potential for sharing park amenities through the new bridge connection. Construction of this project is subject to council approval and funding.