System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
You are given a topic for an Instagram post. Help the post reach a broader audience by suggesting hashtags related to the post.
Input: Another episode of women in science is out now

[Ground truth Answer]
#womeninSTEM #WomenScience #science #research #stempodcast

[Assistant's Response]
To enhance the visibility of your Instagram post about the latest episode of "Women in Science," consider using a mix of targeted hashtags that resonate with your audience and the theme of the episode. Here are some effective hashtags you can incorporate:

1. **General Science and Women Empowerment:**
   - #WomenInScience
   - #WomenInSTEM
   - #FemaleScientists
   - #WomenInResearch
   - #EmpowerWomen

2. **STEM and Education Focus:**
   - #STEM
   - #STEMEducation
   - #ScienceForAll
   - #DiversityInScience

3. **Community and Inspiration:**
   - #ScienceCommunity
   - #InspiringWomen
   - #GirlPower
   - #WomenInTech

4. **Podcast Promotion:**
   - #SciencePodcast
   - #PodcastRecommendation

Feel free to mix and match these hashtags to create a combination that best fits your message and audience. Using a diverse set of hashtags can help your post reach a wider audience interested in science, women’s contributions, and educational content.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: