You%20are%20an%20AI%20assistant.%20Information%20will%20be%20provided%20to%20help%20answer%20the%20user's%20question.%20USE%20ONLY%20THE%20REFERENCE%20INFORMATION%20PROVIDED%20TO%20ANSWER%20THE%20QUESTION.%20Be%20very%20specific%20in%20your%20answer%20and%20focus%20only%20on%20the%20question.%20Do%20not%20reference%20the%20material%20provided%20in%20your%20response.%0AUser%20question:%20Whats%20a%20risk%0AReference%20information:%20%0A%23%23%23%0A7.2.3%20Positive%20Risk%20%20%0AOverview%20(7.2.3.P1)%20%20%0ARisks%20are%20future%20events%20or%20conditions%20that%20have%20some%20probability%20of%20occurring%20and%20some%20impact%20to%20your%20project.%20You%20usually%20always%20think%20of%20risks%20as%20being%20bad%20and%20you%20put%20a%20plan%20in%20place%20to%20make%20sure%20the%20risk%20goes%20away.%20%20%0AHowever,%20is%20it%20true%20that%20all%20risks%20are%20bad%3F%20Let%E2%80%99s%20say%20your%20project%20was%20going%20to%20utilize%20a%20new%20tool%20or%20new%20technology.%20Would%20it%20make%20sense%20that%20your%20project%20was%20riskier%20than%20a%20similar%20project%20that%20is%20using%20current%20technology%3F%20%20%0AOn%20the%20surface%20this%20would%20seem%20to%20be%20correct.%20Your%20team%20probably%20understands%20the%20current%20technology%20better,%20the%20current%20technology%20is%20probably%20more%20stable%20and%20you%20probably%20have%20a%20lot%20more%20support%20infrastructure.%20The%20new%20technology%20is%20not%20understood%20as%20well,%20has%20more%20opportunity%20for%20problems%20and%20you%20don%E2%80%99t%20have%20nearly%20as%20solid%20of%20a%20support%20infrastructure%20in%20case%20something%20goes%20wrong.%20%20%0AIf%20it%20is%20true%20that%20all%20projects%20are%20generally%20more%20risky%20when%20you%20use%20new%20technology,%20why%20would%20you%20ever%20undertake%20a%20project%20with%20new%20technology%3F%20The%20answer%20is%20that%20you%20perceive%20there%20to%20be%20a%20benefit%20to%20your%20project.%20In%20other%20words,%20the%20potential%20impact%20to%20your%20project%20is%20a%20positive.%20This%20still%20meets%20the%20definition%20of%20risk.%0AThink%20of%20Positive%20Risk%20as%20a%20Way%20Gain%20Benefit%20(7.2.P2)%20%20%0ARisk%20is%20usually%20associated%20with%20potential%20events%20that%20have%20a%20negative%20impact%20on%20the%20project.%20However,%20there%20is%20also%20a%20concept%20of%20opportunity%20risk%20or%20positive%20risk.%20In%20these%20instances,%20the%20project%20manager%20or%20project%20team%20may%20introduce%20risk%20to%20try%20to%20gain%20a%20benefit.%20For%20instance,%20a%20team%20may%20decide%20to%20utilize%20a%20new%20technology%20on%20its%20project%20because%20they%20think%20it%20will%20result%20in%20dramatic%20effort%20and%20cost%20savings.%20Of%20course,%20there%20is%20also%20a%20chance%20the%20new%20technology%20will%20not%20work.%20However,%20the%20team%20introduces%20the%20risk%20because%20the%20potential%20for%20gain.%20See%207.2.3%20Positive%20Risk%20for%20more%20details.%20%20%0A(Note:%20the%20Primer%20Project%20Management%20Process%20assumes%20that%20the%20risks%20you%20are%20managing%20are%20negative%20risks.)%20%20%0AMake%20Sure%20Your%20Risks%20Have%20Some%20Level%20of%20Uncertainty%20(7.2.P3)%20%20%0AIf%20an%20event%20is%20identified%20as%20a%20risk,%20there%20has%20to%20be%20some%20level%20of%20uncertainty%20involved.%20In%20other%20words,%20if%20an%20event%20has%20a%20zero%20percent%20likelihood%20of%20occurring,%20it%20would%20not%20make%20sense%20to%20identify%20it%20as%20a%20risk.%20It%20is%20not%20even%20a%20low%20risk.%20It%20is%20not%20a%20risk%20at%20all.%20On%20the%20other%20hand,%20if%20an%20event%20is%20100%25%20certain%20to%20occur,%20it%20is%20also%20not%20a%20risk.%20It%20is%20not%20even%20a%20high%20risk.%20It%20is%20a%20fact.%20(Sometimes%20these%20100%25%20%E2%80%9Crisk%E2%80%9D%20events%20are%20constraints.)%20When%20you%20are%20managing%20risks,%20be%20sure%20to%20focus%20on%20the%20risks%20and%20not%20on%20facts%20and%20fictions.%20%20%0ADistinguish%20Between%20Risks,%20Causes%20and%20Effects%20(7.2.P4)%20%20%0AThere%20is%20a%20cause%20for%20every%20risk%20and%20an%20effect%20if%20the%20risk%20occurs.%20When%20the%20project%20risks%20are%20identified,%20make%20sure%20that%20the%20risk%20itself%20is%20noted%20and%20not%20the%20cause%20or%20effect%20of%20the%20risk.%20The%20cause%20is%20a%20situation%20that%20exists%20that%20sets%20up%20a%20potential%20risk.%20In%20general,%20the%20cause%20is%20a%20fact%20or%20a%20certainty%20for%20the%20project.%20On%20the%20other%20hand,%20the%20effect%20is%20the%20likely%20outcome%20if%20the%20risk%20occurs.%20%20%0AFor%20example,%20let%E2%80%99s%20say%20that%20a%20project%20solution%20needs%20to%20be%20implemented%20in%20all%20of%20a%20company's%20worldwide%20locations,%20including%20those%20in%20developing%20countries.%20If%20the%20telecommunications%20lines%20are%20not%20upgraded%20on%20time,%20the%20solution%20will%20not%20be%20viable%20in%20those%20locations.%20%20%0AIn%20the%20previous%20example,%20what%20is%20the%20risk%3F%0A-%20Is%20it%20a%20risk%20that%20you%20have%20to%20implement%20the%20solution%20in%20developing%20countries%3F%20No,%20that%20is%20the%20cause.%20It%20is%20a%20fact%20or%20a%20requirement.%0A-%20Is%20it%20a%20risk%20that%20the%20solution%20will%20not%20be%20available%20in%20certain%20countries%3F%20No,%20that%20is%20the%20potential%20effect%20of%20what%20might%20occur%20in%20this%20scenario.%0A-%20There%20is%20an%20impact%20to%20your%20project.%20Normally%20risk%20events%20have%20a%20negative%20impact%20on%20your%20project.%20However,%20with%20positive%20risk%20there%20is%20a%20potential%20positive%20impact.%0A-%20There%20is%20a%20probability%20of%20the%20event%20occurring.%20This%20is%20still%20the%20case%20with%20positive%20risks.%20In%20the%20prior%20example,%20if%20the%20benefits%20of%20moving%20to%20new%20technology%20were%20guaranteed,%20you%20could%20make%20the%20decision%20to%20move%20forward%20with%20100%25%20confidence.%20However,%20usually%20the%20benefits%20are%20not%20guaranteed.%20The%20technology,%20or%20the%20implementation%20of%20the%20technology,%20could%20turn%20out%20bad,%20in%20which%20case%20you%20might%20be%20worse%20off%20than%20when%20you%20started.%20%20%0APositive%20risk%20is%20also%20called%20%E2%80%9Copportunity%20risk%E2%80%9D.%20One%20of%20the%20key%20aspects%20of%20positive%20risk%20is%20that%20you%20put%20yourself%20in%20a%20position%20to%20take%20on%20the%20risks.%20Negative%20risks%20are%20potential%20events%20that%20can%20happen%20to%20you.%20They%20are%20the%20ones%20that%20you%20want%20to%20minimize.%20Positive%20risks%20are%20those%20that%20you%20knowingly%20take%20upon%20yourself%20since%20you%20perceive%20there%20to%20be%20benefits%20to%20do%20so.%20%20%0ADifferent%20organizations%20have%20different%20tolerances%20for%20risk.%20If%20you%20take%20an%20intelligent%20risk%20and%20you%20fail,%20what%20happens%3F%20If%20your%20organization%20rewards%20people%20that%20take%20risks%20and%20are%20successful,%20and%20they%20punish%20people%20that%20take%20risks%20and%20fail,%20then%20they%20are%20really%20risk%20averse.%20It%20is%20easy%20to%20reward%20the%20people%20that%20take%20risks%20and%20succeed.%20It%20is%20the%20situation%20of%20the%20risk-taker%20that%20fails%20that%20determines%20whether%20your%20organization%20is%20really%20risk%20averse%20or%20risk%20tolerant.%20%20%0AGenerally%20when%20you%20are%20doing%20risk%20management%20on%20projects%20you%20are%20talking%20about%20potential%20negative%20events.%20However,%20you%20can%20also%20identify%20the%20risk%20events%20that%20lead%20to%20positive%20outcomes.%20These%20opportunity%20risks%20can%20be%20managed%20the%20same%20way%20as%20negative%20risks%20except%20that%20instead%20of%20eliminating%20the%20risks,%20your%20risk%20plan%20will%20include%20activities%20designed%20to%20give%20you%20the%20best%20chance%20that%20the%20risk%20event%20will%20come%20true.%0A%0A7.3%20Manage%20Risk%20/%20Quick%20Reference%20%20%0ATemplates:%20(7.3.P1)%20%20%0AThe%20following%20templates%20are%20available%20in%20the%20Primer%20Template%20Libraries%20to%20support%20this%20process.%0A%23%23%23