System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
In this task, your job is to execute summarization, with the aim of refining the original lengthy response into a more concise version. Carefully read the provided question and corresponding long-form answer, then proceed to eliminate less significant sentences to construct a condensed and concise response. Remember that you should not change the contents of survived sentences, i.e., extractive summarization.\n\nQuestion: What was the difference between the socialism of Nazi Germany and the socialism of the Soviet Union?\n\nOriginal Answer: Despite the name of "national socialism" the Nazis were not actually socialist and very far from anything that could be considered socialist ideology.\n\nThe Soviet union at least was in the same general ball park. They were communist with a Marxist–Leninist ideology. An extreme and specialized outgrowth of the general socialist ideology but socialism none the less.\n\nThere are some conspiracy theories popular in places like the United states of America that would make you think that the Nazis were leftist or part of some communist, Jewish or homosexual conspiracy when they were very much the opposite of that and doing their best to persecute and kill everyone who actually was.\n\nThe Nazis were far right and the Soviets were far left.\n\nDue to the nature of the political spectrum the two extreme points actually did have some things in common. Many of the things they had did have in common were however less outgrowth of their respective ideologies but rather a result of them both being undemocratic and not tolerating dissent as well as accumulating as much power as possibly at the top and removing possible competitors.\n\nNazism was all about race and with some great mythology build around the concept how the Aryan race was destined to throw of the shackles of the lesser race and eventually rule.\n\nCommunism had a completely different ideology that was less centered around race and more around the fact that their political ideology was destined to eventually overcome all others.\n\nBoth were willing to bend and twist their ideologies to suit their needs, even to the point of briefly allying with each other despite being on the face of it natural enemies.

[Ground truth Answer]
Despite the name of "national socialism" the Nazis were not actually socialist and very far from anything that could be considered socialist ideology. The Soviet union at least was in the same general ball park. They were communist with a Marxist–L Leninist ideology. An extreme and specialized outgrowth of the general socialist ideology but socialism none the less. There are some conspiracy theories popular in places like the United states of America that would make you think that the Nazis were leftist or part of some communist, Jewish or homosexual conspiracy when they were very much the opposite of that and doing their best to persecute and kill everyone who actually was. The Nazis were far right and the Soviets were far left. Due to the nature of the political spectrum the two extreme points actually did have some things in common. Many of the things they had did have in common were however less outgrowth of their respective ideologies but rather a result of them both being undemocratic and not tolerating dissent as well as accumulating as much power as possibly at the top and removing possible competitors. Nazism was all about race and with some great mythology build around the concept how the Aryan race was destined to throw of the shackles of the lesser race and eventually rule. Communism had a completely different ideology that was less centered around race and more around the fact that their political ideology was destined to eventually overcome all others. Both were willing to bend and twist their ideologies to suit their needs, even to the point of briefly allying with each other despite being on the face of it natural enemies.

[Assistant's Response]
The socialism of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union differed fundamentally. Despite being labeled "national socialism," the Nazis were not truly socialist; they were far-right, emphasizing racial supremacy and anti-Semitism. In contrast, the Soviet Union adhered to a Marxist–Leninist ideology, a form of socialism focused on class struggle and communism.

While both regimes were undemocratic and intolerant of dissent, their core ideologies diverged significantly. Nazism centered on race, whereas Soviet communism was primarily concerned with overcoming class divisions. Despite their ideological differences, both regimes occasionally adapted their stances for political expediency, even briefly allying with each other.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: