Write me a report on these:

Theme 3: AI and the Future of Work
Theme 3: AI and the Future of Work

To assess the implications of AI on the future of work, including skills development



Task:
Due: Session 7
Weight: 15%
Each member of the group is required to write his/her individual contribution to the report (approximately 500 words). Your contribution should be added to the Group's wiki space.
Note: You must use Google’s wiki development system, sites.google.com. Also, you need to give 
Please provide full access to your instructor only via Email.

Melbourne_Group 5 or 11 : <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Brisbane_Group 1 : <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sydney_Group 1 : <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sydney_Group 4 : <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sydney_Group 7 : <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Sydney_Group 8 : <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_EMAIL_ADDRESS>
Using the questions provided in the attached peer review form, provide feedback to a colleague in your group on their individual draft contribution  Add your feedback to the Group's wiki space on Google’s wiki development system, sites.google.com. 
Upload both the URL of the link to your individual contribution AND the URL of the link to your peer feedback to the  Dropbox for Stage 2.
MARKING GUIDE
Individual Contribution	Marks
Development of discussion	6
Citations APA
(in-text referencing/ references)	4
Paraphrasing	5
Peer Feedback	
Feedback recognises the material’s strengths and weaknesses	6
Feedback is improvement-orientated and guides action rather than simply noting whether “correct” or “incorrect”	6
The language of feedback is appropriate	3
 


Here is the marking guide:
Criteria	
HD (80-100%)
D (70-79%)
C (60-69%)
P (50-59%)
N(0-49%)
Criterion Score
Development of discussion
5 points
Logical, insightful, original discussion with well-connected paragraphs.

(4 - 5 points)

 

3.5 points
Detailed, original discussion develops logically with some connection between adjoining paragraphs. 

(3.5 points)

 

3 points
Adequate discussion   develops logically.

 (3 points)

2.5 points
Inadequate discussion of issues and/or lacking in logical flow.

(2.5 points)

 

1 point
Poor or no discussion of issues and/or lacking in logical flow. 

(0 - 2 points)

 

Score of Development of discussion,/ 5
Citations APA (in-text referencing/ references)
5 points
Correct in-text referencing (APA)

All quoted material acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged.

 (4 - 5 points)

3.5 points
Mostly correct in-text referencing (APA)

All quoted material acknowledged. All paraphrased material acknowledged.

(3.5 points)

3 points
Some correct in-text referencing (APA) Some problems with quoted material and paraphrased material

 (3 points)

2.5 points
Not all material correctly acknowledged.

(2.5 points) 

1 point
Limited materials correctly acknowledged

(0 - 2 points)

 

Score of Citations APA (in-text referencing/ references),/ 5
Paraphrasing
5 points
Excellent, extensive paraphrasing

3.5 points
Many good attempts at  paraphrasing

 

3 points
Overuse of direct quotes. Some paraphrasing

 

2.5 points
Limited overuse of direct quotes.

Little/no paraphrasing

 

1 point
Excessive overuse of direct quotes.

Little/no paraphrasing

 

Score of Paraphrasing,/ 5
Feedback recognises the material’s strengths and weaknesses
5 points
Identifies most key strengths and weaknesses (including gaps) in the material 

 

3.5 points
Identifies some key strengths and weaknesses (including gaps) in the material

 

3 points
Identifies many strengths and weaknesses (including gaps) in the material, with limited attention to the key aspects

 

2.5 points
Attempts to identify some strengths and weaknesses (including gaps) in the material

 

1 point
Limited attempts to identify strengths or weaknesses (including gaps) of the material. Feedback sometimes unclear or inaccurate

 

Score of Feedback recognises the material’s strengths and weaknesses,/ 5
Feedback is improvement-orientated and guides action rather than simply noting whether “correct” or “incorrect”
5 points
Feedback is specific and constructive. As relevant, balances improvement-orientated advice across both the subject matter and the structure of the material

As relevant, all of the following language/scholarly elements addressed: language conventions, quotations, in-text citations, end-of-text references

 

3.5 points
Feedback is constructive. As relevant, balances advice across both the subject matter and the structure of the material

As relevant, at least 3 of the following language/scholarly elements addressed: language conventions, quotations, in-text citations, end-of-text references

 

3 points
Feedback is mostly constructive with minimal corrective comments. Advice is unbalanced focusing more on the subject matter or the structure of the material, but with some reference to both

At least 2 of the following language/scholarly elements addressed: language conventions, quotations, in-text citations, end-of-text references

 

2.5 points
Attempts to provide constructive rather than corrective comments. Advice is unbalanced, addressing only the subject matter or the structure of the material

At least 2 of the following language/scholarly elements addressed: language conventions, quotations, in-text citations, end-of-text references. Many opportunities for improvement overlooked

 

1 point
Feedback comprises mostly corrective comments rather than constructive advice.

Overlooks many opportunities for improvement to the language/scholarly elements.

 

Score of Feedback is improvement-orientated and guides action rather than simply noting whether “correct” or “incorrect”,/ 5
Language of feedback is appropriate
3 points
Language accurately applies professionally appropriate terms, and is overall encouraging

 

2.5 points
Language is appropriate, includes some professionally appropriate terms, and is generally encouraging

 

2 points
Language is appropriate

 

1.5 points
Language is mostly appropriate with few negative connotations

 

1 point
Language is mostly discouraging and/or negative with limited encouragement

 

Score of Language of feedback is appropriate,/ 3
Google sites
2 points
Well planned with effective navigation

1.75 points
Appropriate site with reasonable navigation

1.5 points
Reasonable site and navigation

1 point
Reasonable site with poor navigation

0.5 points
Poor site and navigation

Score of Google sites,/ 2

Good but old example:
**Maximizing Workforce Potential in the Era of AI: Strategies for Skills Development**

**Introduction:**
As Artificial Intelligence (AI) continues to permeate various industries, the future of work undergoes a profound transformation. According to a report by PwC, AI is projected to contribute up to $15.7 trillion to the global economy by 2030 (PwC, 2017). In this report, we explore the multifaceted impact of AI on workforce dynamics and outline strategies for enhancing skills development to adapt to this evolving landscape.

**AI's Influence on Job Roles:**
AI's integration is redefining job roles by automating repetitive tasks and augmenting human capabilities. According to a study by McKinsey, it is estimated that by 2030, up to 800 million jobs could be displaced by automation worldwide (McKinsey, 2017). This shift necessitates a reevaluation of traditional job descriptions and the identification of new skill requirements. Understanding AI's influence on job roles enables organizations to proactively prepare their workforce for the changing nature of work.

**Essential Skills for the AI-driven Economy:**
In the AI-driven economy, certain skills emerge as indispensable. Technical proficiency in areas such as programming, data analysis, and machine learning is crucial for leveraging AI technologies effectively. According to LinkedIn's 2021 Jobs on the Rise report, job postings for AI-related roles have increased by 32% annually over the past three years (LinkedIn, 2021). Soft skills like creativity, emotional intelligence, and adaptability are equally essential in navigating the complexities of human-AI collaboration.

**Strategies for Skills Development:**
To equip the workforce with the necessary skills for the AI era, organizations must adopt proactive skills development strategies. Collaboration between employers, educational institutions, and policymakers is essential to design comprehensive training programs. These programs should prioritize not only technical skills but also foster a culture of continuous learning and adaptation. According to a survey conducted by Deloitte, 94% of executives believe that employees should have access to continuous learning opportunities to keep pace with technological advancements (Deloitte, 2021). Lifelong learning initiatives, apprenticeships, and mentorship programs play a pivotal role in providing employees with opportunities for upskilling and reskilling.

**Conclusion:**
In conclusion, AI's impact on workforce dynamics underscores the importance of strategic skills development initiatives. By recognizing AI's influence on job roles, identifying essential skills for the AI-driven economy, and implementing effective skills development strategies, organizations can position themselves to thrive in an AI-enabled future. Embracing a culture of lifelong learning and innovation will be key to unlocking the full potential of the workforce in the era of AI.

[Word Count: 319 words]

References:
- PwC. (2017). Sizing the prize: What's the real value of AI for your business and how can you capitalize? Retrieved from https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/analytics/assets/pwc-ai-analysis-sizing-the-prize-report.pdf
- McKinsey. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/jobs-lost-jobs-gained-what-the-future-of-work-will-mean-for-jobs-skills-and-wages
- LinkedIn. (2021). Jobs on the rise: New skills for a changing world. Retrieved from https://business.linkedin.com/content/dam/me/business/en-us/talent-solutions/emerging-jobs-report/Emerging%20Jobs%20Report%20US%20-%202021.pdf
- Deloitte. (2021). Deloitte global human capital trends: The social enterprise in a world disrupted. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends.html
this is using old info like 2017-2021, info has to be future with evidience, so no old data no data that is before 2024.

with (apa 7th)