You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


14 SHARES Facebook Twitter

With today’s never-ending sea of content production, we all inevitably miss out on seeing at least a few films on our radar. Catching up the movies somehow passed us by is often how many cinema lovers spend the early months of the new calendar year. Unless you’ve been a-hankering for all the groundbreaking achievements that studios love to drop in January (buy your opening night tickets for “Dr. Dolittle” yet?), most trips to the multiplex will find your average film buff checking out the awards players and festival darlings which friends have been buzzing about for months that passed them by. But, even in a year where excellent titles like “Parasite,” and “Little Women” drive much of the conversation, a sea of smaller gems always slip through the cracks, sinking to the bottomless depths of a content cluttered ocean.

READ MORE: The 100 Best Films Of The Decade [2010s]

Thus, while we all pray that we won’t find ourselves at war come tomorrow’s sunrise, we present our “Best Films of 2019 That You Didn’t See” list. To be quite honest, as one of our treasured readers, we’re assuming that your taste maybe a wee bit more eclectic than the average moviegoer. So, as much as we love us some Terrence Malick or Pedro Almodóvar, certain artists aren’t exactly lacking in the awareness category of our community, and we opted not to include their films on here in favor of lesser-known projects (apologies, to the excellent “A Hidden Life,” and “Pain & Glory”). There are also a handful of great movies, such as Alex Ross Perry’s “Her Smell” or Claire Denis’ “High Life, ”whose praise we’ve been singing all season long, and all year, really (both debuting at 2018 festivals). And, while it technically only screened for one week in both New York and Los Angeles, Céline Sciamma’s incomparable, “Portrait of a Lady on Fire” was left off the list for essentially the same reason. We imagine those who haven’t had the privilege of seeing it yet will be doing so come Valentine’s Day. You couldn’t ask for a better movie to watch, whether you’ve got someone to spend the evening with or not.

READ MORE: 100 Most Anticipated Films Of 2020

Our fingers are crossed that you haven’t heard of a couple of titles on here, because it’s always exciting to make new discoveries, and one of the best things about being a film writer is introducing folks to the little films we love that are prone to get swept under the rug. And, just a reminder, you can further distract yourselves from the soul-shattering politics likely dominating your news feeds with our other end of the year wrap-up content, including our 25 Best Films Of 2019, The 100 Best Films Of The Decade, 100 Most Anticipated Films Of 2020, the Best Performances Of The Decade, Best Cinematography, and Soundtracks of the Decade, Best TV of the Decade, Best Documentaries Of The Decade, Best Animated Films Of The Decade, Best TV of 2019, Best Posters/Trailers of 2019 and, of course, “The Horniest Movies of the Decade.” – Andrew Bundy

READ MORE: The 25 Best Films Of 2019

25. “The Brink/The Great Hack”

Yes, yes, we are being a bit sneaky by including a couple of double entries, but the shadiness feels all too appropriate in this case, as “The Brink,” director Alison Klayman’s bone-chilling, fly-on-the-wall look at Donald Trump’s former Chief Strategist, Steve Bannon, makes for a perfect double feature with Jehane Noujaim and Karim Amer’s more entertaining, but equally disturbing documentary on Facebook/Cambridge Analytica’s data mining scandal, “The Great Hack.” Watching the two together pretty succinctly spells out exactly what happened during 2016 that allowed our resident murderous pumpkin-head to rise and manipulate his way into power. Thanks to the tactics implemented by the Trump campaign’s head honchos – using Bannon’s button-pushing methodology and aiming certain ads at specific subsets of individual voters – all the information gathered and utilized by the election team thanks to social platforms like Facebook provided a convenient avenue to use “micro-targeting” in order to rile, inspire, and confuse, the uneducated. Watching the two docs in a vacuum may not exactly make for a motivational experience (especially considering the Qassem Soleimani situation) but will rally one’s outrage at our nation’s currently detestable political state. –AB

24. “Suburban Birds”

Constructed as two narratives connected through the metaphysics of film language, Qui Sheng’s “Suburban Birds” finds an engineering crew investigating a series of mysterious craters that have resulted in the collapse of communal structures. The second plot thread follows a group of young children who tempt fate in what feels like a slow cinema version of a coming of age fable-like “Stand by Me.” The sheer ambition of the film feels reminiscent of something like Bi Gan’s “Kaili Blues,” a debut project that acts as a poetic precursor to an incredible follow-up achievement (one you may find somewhere on this list…). Like Tsai Ming-liang’s meditative pictures, “Suburban Birds,” is not an easy movie to describe; it’s transcendental art cinema utilizing uniquely expressive compositions — quick pans and extreme zooms — that must be experienced firsthand, sharing several similarities with the aforementioned Taiwanese director’s debut film “Rebels of the Neon God.” As we wrote in our review, “[Suburban Birds] is the kind of first feature that gets you energized for whatever the new filmmaker has in store for audiences next… [it’s] far from perfect, and occasionally frustrating, but delicate and precise in its creative decision-making… the kind of movie you sit on, but then can’t wait to revisit.” – AB

23. “The Biggest Little Farm”

John Chester is an Emmy award-winning docu-series filmmaker and television director who had been working in the film industry for 25 years. As his latest doc tells it though, he was a little bit done, feeling spiritually weary. So, he and his wife, Molly, a personal chef, invested in organic, clean, food, decided to do the unthinkable: trade their lives in Los Angeles for a barren farm outside of the city. “The Biggest Little Farm,” is their eight-years-in-the-making story of taking a random plot of land outside L.A., and despite massive obstacles, creating the sustainable Apricot Lane Farms in Moorpark, California. Visually, Chester’s years of camera work paid off because the doc is gorgeous, but also it’s so hopeful, heartrending and inspiring, a genuine portrait about dreamers, nature and the harmony that can be found in such ambitious ideas. Both educational and acting as an environmental advocacy doc (perfect for kids, btw), it’s also deeply engrossing, entertaining and incredibly uplifting, a perfectly wonderful portrait of awe-inspiring human beings, community and communion with the world we live in. – Rodrigo Perez

22. “Wrestle”

“Hoop Dreams” for the amateur wrestling community might be a reductive way to frame Oscillioscope’s deeply underseen and deeply underrated documentary “Wrestle,” by filmmakers Suzannah Herbert and Lauren Belfer, but it’s also apt, taking sports, personal struggle, dreams and coming-of-age challenges to create a similarly stirring and heartbreaking doc about trying to win a golden ticket. Centering on four young black teenagers in economically depressed Alabama, at a high school on the states’ list of most consistently failing schools, their socio-economic circumstances are not great, to put it mildly. The doc gets further complicated when it wades into the ideas of the affluent, white, tough-love-approach coach, who is trying to push these kids towards athletic excellence but is not equipped to truly understand their emotional states. Without letting him off the hook, the deeply compelling “Wrestle” examines the complexities of race, class, and privilege in the South, without forgetting its absorbing, intimate, humanist portrayal of these boys, their difficult lives, and struggles to excel. And at the very least, if there was a prize for the most rousing, stirring, grab-you-by-the-jugular opening of a documentary in 2019, “Wrestle” would win that prize, hands down. – RP

21. “Honeyland”

Reciprocity is the key to life, when nurturing nature, most especially. What’s fascinating about “Honeyland,” which could very well have played like your run-of-the-mill observational documentary, is how it doesn’t feel like a documentary film in the slightest. The striking compositions will immediately pull you into a world you’ve been entirely ignorant of, off to a land where the word neighbor has significantly more importance and impact than it does when you live a cozy life of the suburbs. The aesthetic approach is wholly film grammar forward, drone shots soaring above the mountains of Macedonia, following the world’s last honorable beekeeper as she traverses across the jagged bluffs, and the movie has no virtually talking heads; we learn about the lifestyle through the process of hard work. “Honeyland” feels akin to realist third world cinema that transports you to another country, spinning composition driven, emotional dramaturgy out of a specific ethnic ecosystem. It’s also paced like slow cinema in many ways, which does the doc a bit of a disservice when it comes to establishing all of the various components at the outset but results in a stirring ending that will bring tears to your eyes. – AB