Given multiple reviews about 1974 ['movie'] ['Murder on the Orient Express'], each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ["I've seen 3 film adaptations of this novel and this one is definitely the best. You must see it!", 'Albert Finney is kind of annoying in the role of Hercule Poirot. It\'s kind of like he\'s doing a combination of James Mason and the Hunchback of Notre Dame. I seriously don\'t know what the deal was with his shoulders hunching the whole time. However, it was a great story. Hard to fail when you have good writing. And Agatha Christie knew how to tell \'em. Overall enjoyable, but a little dated. Also, Ingrid Bergman\'s Academy Award must have been a lifetime achievement award, because she wasn\'t particularly good in what was really a small part. She wasn\'t bad, but it\'s not something you point at and say "Wow. She stole the show."', 'Usually when I\'m watching a murder mystery like this I\'ll have paper and pen ready to take notes of the characters as an aid in trying to figure out who the culprit was. Turns out it was a moot exercise here, and if you haven\'t seen the picture I won\'t spoil it, but be prepared for a novel surprise. As with a lot of these cable movie mainstays I delayed watching the picture for the longest time and as happens in most cases, I should have gotten around to it a lot sooner. All the performers are top notch, and Albert Finney simply cracked me up as the Belgian detective Hercule Poirot. I can\'t imagine all those physical and facial contortions he had to put up with to interpret his character but it was a sketch. Tough call between him and Art Carney for Best Actor ("Harry and Tonto") that year, it could have gone either way. With Ingrid Bergman, quite honestly I didn\'t even recognize her in the role of Greta Ohlssen. Perhaps that was part of the calculation in awarding her Best Supporting Actress, however I personally couldn\'t see it. As for the rest, all bring something marvelous to their characterizations, with John Gielgud\'s Beddoes a close second to Finney as my favorite in the film. All in all a wonderful murder mystery with very obvious overtones to the famous Lindbergh Baby kidnapping case of the early Thirties. The resolution forces some critical thinking on the part of the viewer as to Poirot and Bianchi\'s (Martin Balsam) recommendation to the authorities. One thing bothers me though relative to murder victim Ratchett/Casetti. Without giving away the ending but considering the resolution, why would Richard Widmark\'s character have been getting death threats in the first place?'] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.