System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Predict the discourse marker continuation\n"In other words i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "By then i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "Altogether, i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "Thus, i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "Really, i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "Additionally i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "Later, i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "Afterward i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "In short, i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."
    "Truly, i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant."

[Ground truth Answer]
Additionally i devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an it consultant.

[Assistant's Response]
To effectively continue the thought expressed in the sentence "In other words, I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant," you can use various discourse markers that convey a similar meaning or transition smoothly to related ideas. Here are some suitable options:

1. **"Consequently,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.
2. **"Furthermore,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.
3. **"Moreover,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.
4. **"In summary,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.
5. **"Ultimately,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.
6. **"Additionally,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.
7. **"Thus,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.
8. **"In short,"** I devote time each week to writing my book, in addition to my position as an IT consultant.

When selecting a discourse marker, consider the context and the nuance you wish to convey. For instance, "Furthermore" and "Moreover" suggest an addition of information, while "Thus" implies a conclusion drawn from previous statements. Each option can help to clarify the relationship between your writing endeavors and your role as an IT consultant. Feel free to choose the one that best fits the tone and flow of your writing. If you need more suggestions or specific contexts, let me know!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: