In 1000 words, i am to write a M.Sc. dissertation proposal on Cybersecurity Framework Evaluation, where i am to Analyze and compare different cyber security frameworks like NIST, ISO 27001 etc. and make recommendations for implementations.

I am to use the following structure

Project Title: Do not worry if your project title may slightly change as the project evolves…

Problem you are seeking to address: You should aim to concisely describe the problem you are trying to solve / investigate; by addressing the following points that are listed below in this template (aim and scope; project objectives; … testing and evaluation; ethical considerations)

Aim and scope: 2 – 3 paragraphs; provide links to the literature when necessary to bridge the identified gaps with your project’s aims towards these gaps.

Project objectives: 2 – 4 bullet points.

Expected project outcomes: 1 – 3 paragraphs including a description of your proposed artefact and the statement of the way(s) in which your artefact will help to overcome (some aspect of) the challenge identified in your problem statement.

Brief review of relevant literature: This may just be a list of resources (such as databases and journal articles that you anticipate referring to). However, it is better if you practice correct citation and referencing style, describing how you intend to use these resources and why these are likely to be useful to show that you have actually read them!

At least 10 references – no maximum number. References are not included in the word count limit.

[optional] References: You may decide to have a separate section here just for your references so that you can practice using UWE Harvard standards of referencing. These will not count towards your word limit.

Testing and Evaluation: Statement of how you plan to test and evaluate the success of your work (1 paragraph minimum).

Ethical considerations: Are there ethical issues related to the project? Are you collecting primary data – if so, how is it being collected, stored, and is there a retention / destruction plan. Have you consulted with your group advisor on this? Have you perhaps modified your original scope as a result of ethical considerations? (The length may vary, but this should be a minimum of 1 sentence).

Project plan: Gantt chart or similar to visualise the next steps in your project.


For this, i have written the following.
Problem you are seeking to address:	Due to the digital landscape's burgeoning complexity, cybersecurity threats are increasing alarmingly. In the midst of a plethora of cybersecurity frameworks, such as NIST and ISO 27001, organizations face challenges choosing and implementing the right one. It is difficult to make optimal decisions without a systematic approach to evaluating these frameworks (Hadlington, 2017). THis study explores how cybersecurity frameworks combat contemporary digital threats and develop a robust foundation for selecting and implementing frameworks based on the multifaceted nature of cybersecurity frameworks (ENISA, 2016).

Aim and scope:	This project aims to create a comprehensive comparison among leading cybersecurity frameworks, assessing them against today's cybersecurity requirements. NIST's Cybersecurity Framework (NIST, 2018) and the ISO 27001 standards (ISO/IEC, 2013) will be examined for their structural coherence, versatility, and real-world applicability. Using this analysis, organizations can build practical and empirical foundations for their cybersecurity strategies by identifying their comparative strengths and weaknesses.
This study goes beyond mere comparisons to identify synergistic practices which may be expanded to augment existing frameworks. This project will bridge the literature gap by proposing a dynamic, adaptable evaluation model to address the challenges presented by rapid technological advancements and emerging threats. A scalable and informative guide will be produced through the incorporation of insights from industry and academia, aiding organizations across a wide range of sectors to strengthen their information security through the implementation of informed frameworks and tailored enhancements (Singer & Friedman, 2014).

Project objectives:	To identify and compare structural integrity, adaptability, and operational effectiveness of NIST, ISO 27001, and other relevant cybersecurity standards.
To establish criteria to assess current and future cybersecurity frameworks according to the essential characteristics.
To synthesize findings from the comparative analysis to suggest a flexible comprehensive cybersecurity framework that is able to meet diverse organizational needs.
To guide organizations in choosing and implementing a cybersecurity framework tailored to their specific threats, regulatory environment, and business objectives based on a comprehensive comparison analysis.
Expected project outcomes:	Methodically, this project will provide a detailed analytical report comparing and contrasting the leading cybersecurity frameworks, emphasizing their suitability for different organizational contexts. Among other standards, we will assess NIST, ISO 27001, and other pertinent ones, highlighting their capabilities, coverage, and responsiveness to cyber threats. A comprehensive evaluation model based on this study will be developed to assess each framework's ability to provide robust cybersecurity measures that adapt to evolving digital threats.
In order to guide organizations in selecting the most appropriate cybersecurity framework, this project will produce an innovative decision-support tool. It will take the form of a framework selection matrix based on the comparative analysis and the criteria developed. Various factors will be considered, including organization size, industry type, regulatory requirements, and the specific cybersecurity threats faced. The selection matrix not only streamlines the decision-making process for organizations, but also aims to bridge the gap between theory and practice when it comes to cybersecurity frameworks.
Brief review of relevant literature:	There is extensive literature concerning cybersecurity frameworks and different approaches to protecting information assets. Upon review of these literatures, it is evident that established cybersecurity frameworks like the NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) are of fundamental importance. The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) provides guidance on how private sector organizations can evaluate and improve their ability to prevent, detect, and respond to cyber-attacks (NIST, 2018) through providing a policy framework for computer security guidance. ISO/IEC 27001 similarly provides a system to manage company information in a secure way, including policies, procedures, and systems (ISO/IEC, 2013).
A number of scholarly articles examine how cybersecurity frameworks interact and how they are effective in different industries, arguing that while certain frameworks can be robust in scope, their complexity can prevent effective adoption (Gordon, 2015). Another stream of literature, on the other hand, focuses on how cybersecurity frameworks can adapt to emerging technologies and how frameworks like NIST CSF can facilitate continuous improvement in cybersecurity practices through the iterative approach (Schatz & Bashroush, 2017).
In order to understand the synergies and gaps between different standards, comparative studies are necessary. As an example, Webber et al. (2014) compare NIST CSF with ISO 27001, providing insight into how these standards can be operationalised within enterprise risk management. Research by Raguseo (2018) further emphasizes that multinational corporations operating across multiple regulatory landscapes face challenges in ensuring compliance with multiple frameworks.
The proposed project will be guided by this foundation for systematic evaluation.
Testing and Evaluation:	A multifaceted testing and evaluation strategy will determine the success of this project. A panel of experts will first vet the proposed criteria for evaluating cybersecurity frameworks to ensure their relevance and comprehensiveness. Following this, each framework will be scored based on how well it covers cybersecurity principles, adapts to change, and supports different kinds of organizations. Both qualitative and quantitative metrics will be used in the evaluation process.
A series of hypothetical business case scenarios will be used to assess the effectiveness of the decision matrix tool by cybersecurity professionals. The feedback they provide will be crucial to improving the tool's functionality and ensuring it assists in decision-making effectively. By comparing the project's outcomes with current cybersecurity implementations in a selection of case studies, the overall effectiveness and improvements of the project will be validated.
Ethical considerations:	Information collection, handling, and dissemination will strictly adhere to ethical guidelines. Due to the study's reliance on secondary data, efforts will be made to ensure that all citations and references are properly attributed following UWE Harvard referencing standards to prevent plagiarism. The university's ethics committee will be consulted if primary data collection becomes necessary.
Participants will receive informed consent forms before participating in interviews or surveys, ensuring confidentiality and the right to withdraw at any time. A clear plan will be in place for retaining and destroying data post-research in accordance with data protection policies so that any collected data is anonymous and securely stored. Furthermore, the recommendations will be sensitively managed to avoid inadvertent harm or disadvantage to existing jobs and cyber practices.




Now, i am advised to be specific on the sector focused on and in this, i have chosen education. Also, i want to include an artefact in the objectives (To deliver detailed analysis of the best practices.). Also, at the end of the dissertation itselfI am going to make a handbook on the different framework and the best practices to adopt.

As precisely as possible, Generate what i should add and tell me where to include all these.
Thanks