System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
Determine whether the document supports or contradicts the given hypothesis. If there is no mention of it, output 'NotMentioned.'\n\n<Document>\nNON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT\nThis Nondisclosure Agreement (the "Agreement") is entered into by and between The National Archives, (the "Disclosing Party"), and _______________________, located at __________________ _________________________________________________ (the "Receiving Party"), for the purpose of preventing the unauthorised disclosure of Sensitive Information as defined below, in line with HMG’s Security Policy Framework. The parties agree to enter into a confidential relationship with respect to the disclosure of certain sensitive, proprietary or protected information ("Sensitive Information").\n1. Definition of Sensitive Information. For purposes of this Agreement, "Sensitive Information" shall include all information or material that\n has or could have commercial value or other utility in the business in which Disclosing Party is engaged\n might lead to the security of the Disclosing Party’s physical or information assets or the safety of its staff and customers being compromised.\nIf Sensitive Information is in a physical or electronic form, the Disclosing Party shall label or stamp the materials with the words OFFICIAL-SENSITIVE, or some similar warning, in line with HMG’s protective marking scheme. If Sensitive Information is transmitted orally, the Disclosing Party shall promptly provide a writing indicating that such oral communication constituted Sensitive Information.\n2. Exclusions from Sensitive Information. Receiving Party's obligations under this Agreement do not extend to information that is: (a) publicly known at the time of disclosure or subsequently becomes publicly known through no fault of the Receiving Party; (b) discovered or created by the Receiving Party before disclosure by Disclosing Party; (c) learned by the Receiving Party through legitimate means other than from the Disclosing Party or Disclosing Party's representatives; (d) is disclosed by Receiving Party with Disclosing Party's prior written approval; or (e) independently developed by the Receiving Party outside the scope of this agreement.\n3. Obligations of Receiving Party. Receiving Party shall hold and maintain the Sensitive Information in strictest confidence for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Disclosing Party. Receiving Party shall carefully restrict access to Sensitive Information to employees, contractors and third parties as is reasonably required and shall require those persons to sign nondisclosure restrictions at least as protective as those in this Agreement. Receiving Party shall put in place effective governance controls to monitor compliance and respond to (and report) any security breach incidents. Receiving Party shall not, without prior written approval of Disclosing Party, use for Receiving Party's own benefit, publish, copy, or otherwise disclose to others, or permit the use by others for their benefit or to the detriment of Disclosing Party, any Sensitive Information. Receiving Party shall return to Disclosing Party any and all records, notes, and other written, printed, or tangible materials in its possession pertaining to Sensitive Information within a reasonable time period if Disclosing Party requests it in writing.\n4. Time Periods. The non-disclosure provisions of this Agreement shall survive the termination of this Agreement and Receiving Party's duty to hold Sensitive Information in confidence shall remain in effect until the Sensitive Information no longer qualifies as a trade secret or otherwise needing protection until Disclosing Party sends Receiving Party written notice releasing Receiving Party from this Agreement, whichever occurs first.\n5. Relationships. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be deemed to constitute either party a partner, joint venture or employee of the other party for any purpose.\n6. Severability. If a court finds any provision of this Agreement invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement shall be interpreted so as best to effect the intent of the parties.\n7. Integration. This Agreement expresses the complete understanding of the parties with respect to the subject matter and supersedes all prior proposals, agreements, representations and understandings. This Agreement may not be amended except in writing signed by both parties.\n8. Waiver. The failure to exercise any right provided in this Agreement shall not be a waiver of prior or subsequent rights.\nThis Agreement and each party's obligations shall be binding on the representatives, assigns and successors of such party. Each party has signed this Agreement through its authorised representative. __________________________________________________________________________ (Signature, on behalf of Disclosing Party)\nDate: _______________\n__________________________________________________________________________ (Signature, on behalf of Receiving Party)\n\n\n<Hypothesis>\nReceiving Party shall not disclose the fact that Agreement was agreed or negotiated.

[Ground truth Answer]
NotMentioned

[Assistant's Response]
To determine whether the provided document supports or contradicts the hypothesis that "Receiving Party shall not disclose the fact that Agreement was agreed or negotiated," we need to analyze the content of the Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) in relation to the hypothesis.

The NDA outlines the obligations of the Receiving Party regarding Sensitive Information, which includes not disclosing any such information without prior written approval from the Disclosing Party. However, the document does not explicitly mention any restrictions concerning the disclosure of the existence of the Agreement itself or the fact that it was agreed or negotiated. 

The main focus of the NDA is on the protection of Sensitive Information, which is defined broadly to include proprietary or protected information that could have commercial value or affect the security of the Disclosing Party. The obligations outlined include maintaining confidentiality and restricting access to Sensitive Information but do not specifically address the confidentiality of the Agreement's existence or the negotiation process.

Given this analysis, since the document does not explicitly support or contradict the hypothesis, and there is no mention of the confidentiality of the Agreement's existence or negotiation, the appropriate response is:

**NotMentioned.**

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: