You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Introduction {#Sec1}
============

*Saprolegnia* is ubiquitous in freshwater ecosystems and is considered as the main genus of water molds responsible for significant fungal infections of freshwater fish and eggs (Noga [@CR27]), especially from the egg stage through smoltification (Bruno & Wood [@CR7]; Pickering [@CR29]). *Saprolegnia* is an opportunist facultative parasite (Neish [@CR26]), which is saprotrophic and necrotrophic (Bruno & Wood [@CR7]). On fish, *Saprolegnia* invades epidermal tissues visible as white or grey patches of filamentous mycelium (Bruno & Wood [@CR7]; Beakes et al.[@CR3]), generally beginning on the head or fins (Neish [@CR26]; Willoughby [@CR36]) and can spread over the entire surface of the body. *Saprolegnia* is characterized by an external, cotton-like appearance that radiates out in a circular, crescent-shaped or whorled pattern. The fungal spores may be transmitted by hatchery fish, wild fish, eggs, water supplies, and equipment (Bruno & Wood [@CR7]).

A number of workers have reported *Saprolegnia* infection in fishes; salmonids (Beakes et al. [@CR3]; Hatai & Hoshiai , Hatai & Hoshiai Hatai & Hoshiai [@CR16]), teleosts (Bruno & Wood [@CR7]), Channel catfish (Howe et al. [@CR18]), pike (Willoughby [@CR34]), bass (Noga [@CR27]), elver and suckers (Roberts [@CR30]), roach, orfe, carp, tench, lamprey, sturgeon, barramundi, tilapia, and mullet (Bruno & Wood [@CR7]). It has also been associated with tropical fish, including the kissing gourami, guppy, swordfish and platyfish (Willoughby [@CR36]; Roberts [@CR30]). The air breathing teleost, *Anabas testudineus*, from an Indian river was also found to carry *S. parasitica* infections (Mohanta & Patra [@CR24]).

*Saprolegnia* generally invades fish that have been stressed or otherwise have weakened immune systems (Bruno & Wood [@CR7]). A number of chemicals such as malachite green (Willoughby & Roberts [@CR35]; Bruno & Wood , Bruno & Wood Bruno & Wood [@CR7]), 37% formaldehyde (Van Waters [@CR33]), hydrogen peroxide (Fitzpatrick et al. [@CR14]; Marking et al. [@CR20]), sodium chloride at high concentrations (Pickering [@CR29];Marking et al. [@CR20]), etc. are available for treatment of fungal infection but a few are approved for use in aquaculture. The reduction of stress and boosting up immune response by application of immunostimulants appears to be the single greatest factor to help fish resist saprolegniasis.

β-glucan are a group of glucose polymers which are the main structural components of cell-wall in fungi, plants and some bacteria (Brown & Gordon [@CR5]). They can be derived from the cell walls of yeast, bacteria, fungi, and cereals such as oats, barley, and rye. They have a backbone of β (1--3)-linked β -D-glucopyranosyl units with side chains of different lengths. A variety of cell surface receptors bind β -glucan, including lectins, scavenger receptors, and integrins on monocyte/macrophages, neutrophils, and natural killer (NK) cells and various lymphocyte subpopulations (Brown & Gordon [@CR5]). Engagement of these receptors by β -glucan may induce activation of leukocytes, phagocytic activity, production of inflammatory cytokines and chemokines, microbial killing, and initiate the development of adaptive immunity, all of which contribute to the anti-infective and antitumorigenic properties of β -glucan (Brown et al. [@CR6]; Misra *et al.*[@CR22]). β -Glucan has also been shown to enhance resistance of fish and crustacea against bacterial and viral infections (Chang et al. [@CR8]; Misra et al. [@CR23]; Misra et al. [@CR22]).

The present experiment was designed to study the effect of β --glucan immersion in three different doses on immune response and survival of eight day old spawn of *Anabas testudineus* challenged with *Saprolegnia parasitica*.

Materials and methods {#Sec2}
=====================

Fish {#Sec3}
----

*Anabas testudineus* spawns of 8 days old were obtained from the farm of Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture (CIFA), Bhubaneswar, Orissa, India. The spawns were acclimatized in a circular plastic container of 20 l capacity in the laboratory of Fish Health Management Division, CIFA for two days. The spawns were fed with a formulated diet obtained from CIFA at 5% of the total body weight for two times a day.

β--glucan {#Sec4}
---------

β--glucan obtained from Barley (Sigma) in powder form was added to phosphate buffer saline (pH 7.4) and subsequently sonicated (Artek Sonic Dismembrator Model 150) using a microtip at a relative output of 0.6 and duty cycle of 40%. The concentration was adjusted as 5 mgl^-1^, 10 mgl^-1^ and 15 mgl^-1^ respectively by using sterile milliQ water (Millipore Corporation, India). Immersion was selected as the route of administration of β--glucan.

Experimental design {#Sec5}
-------------------

The spawns after acclimatization were divided into four major groups for exposure to different concentrations of β--glucan, such as Group A (0 mg l^-1^, control), Group B (5 mg l^-1^), Group C (10 mg l^-1^) and Group D (15 mg l^-1^). Fifty spawns were kept in each of the duplicate beaker (1L) for each treatment group. After bath exposure with β --glucan suspension for 3 h, four spawns were collected from each tank after a time interval of 3 h for evaluating changes in lysozyme activity, acid phosphate (AcP) activity, total protein content, bactericidal activity and superoxide anion assay. As it was difficult to draw blood from spawn with indistinctly developed internal organs, the entire body of four spawns taken at a time was aseptically placed in a macerator containing Hank's Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS) and anticoagulant, heparin. The macerated sample was layered on to preform continuous gradients of 51% percoll (Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden) in 8.5 g l^-1^ NaCl and centrifuged at 800 g for 20 min at 4°C. The white cell band formed at the interface of the cell suspension and percoll layer was harvested with a Pasteur pipette, diluted ten folds with HBSS and recentrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 4°C to remove residual percoll. The resulting pellet was again washed twice and centrifuged at 800 g for 10 min at 4°C. The resultant white band cell suspension was used for assaying lysozyme, acid phosphatase, bactericidal, superoxide anion activities and total protein content. After the third wash, the concentration and viability of leucocytes cell suspensions were determined in 0.2% trypan blue. The total protein content of the cell lysate was analysed using protein kit (Bangalore Genei Protein Kit, Bradford macro method) and bovine serum albumin as standard as per the manufacturers instructions.

Challenge {#Sec6}
---------

After exposing in β--glucan suspension for 3 h, the spawns were removed from the glucan treated/untreated group and placed in normal freshwater. The spawns were divided into two sub-groups (32 nos. each) and each treatment group was challenged by immersing in viable fungal suspension of *Saprolegnia parasitica* at a concentration of 3×10^5^ CFU ml^-1^ for seven days. Four spawns from the first sub-group of each treatment challenged with *S. parasitica* were taken on day 3 and day 7 post challenges for evaluating changes in lysozyme, acid phosphate and total protein content. Each test was repeated four times and mean of the sample was taken.

Lysozyme activity of the cell suspension {#Sec7}
----------------------------------------

Lysozyme activity of cell suspension in each subgroup was measured by turbidimetric method described by Parry *et al.*([@CR28]) using 0.2 mg ml^-1^ lyophilized *Micrococcus luteus* ATCC 49732 (DIFCO, BBL- Qualis lab) as the substrate in 0.05 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.2). Various amount of cell suspension (25-100 μL) were added to 2 ml of the bacterial cell and the absorbance was measured at 0.5 and 4.5 min intervals at 530 nm (25°C). One unit of lysozyme activity is defined as the amount of sample causing a decrease in absorbance of 0.001 min^-1^.

Bactericidal activity of the cell suspension {#Sec8}
--------------------------------------------

Bactericidal activity of the cell suspension was estimated by following the procedure of Kajita et al. ([@CR19]) with little modification. An equal volume (100 μl) of the spawn cell suspension and bacterial cell was mixed and incubated for 1h at 25°C. A blank control was prepared by replacing the cell suspension with sterile PBS. The mixture was then diluted with sterile PBS at a ratio of 1: 10. The diluted mixture (100 μl) was pour plated in nutrient agar and plates were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The number of viable bacteria was determined by counting the colonies grown in nutrient agar plates.

Bactericidal activity in % = (No. of colonies in control- No. of colonies in sample × 100) / No. of colonies in control

NBT activity of the cell suspension {#Sec9}
===================================

The NBT activity was measured according to Chung & Secombes ([@CR9]) with some modifications. At first, 96-well flat bottom microtitre plate was taken and coated with 100 μl poly-L-lysine solution (0.2% Sigma). To this, 100 μl cell suspension sample was added in 5 of the 96 wells of the microtitre plate and then incubated at 25°C for 2 h and then washed with HBSS. Then 100 μl of NBT solution (0.02 gm NBT + 0.050 μl methanol + 0.94 μl PBS + 0.010 μl bacterial suspension) was added, which contained 10^6^ numbers of *A. hydrophila* cells/ml. Subsequently it was incubated at 25°C for 1h. Then the medium was removed and the reaction was terminated. Again washing was done (3 times) by addition of methanol, which was followed by air drying. Subsequently, the formazan in each well was dissolved with 120 μl of 2 M KOH and 140 μl of DMSO. The absorbance was measured at 655 nm in the ELISA reader (Biorad), with 405 nm as reference.

Acid Phosphatase activity {#Sec10}
=========================

The acid phosphatase activity was measured using Acid phosphatase kit (Batch No. 14407/14507 manufactured by Accurex Biomedical Pvt. Ltd.) following the method of Hillman ([@CR17]). The working solution was prepared by dissolving the contents of the substrate bottle with diluent. One ml of the AcP working solution was added to 100 μl of sample. Absorbance was measured after 5 min at 405 nm and subsequently three more readings were recorded after 1 min interval. The concentration of AcP was calculated as u/l by using the formulae i.e*.,* Conc. in 1u/l = 743 × Δ Abs./ min

Statistical analysis {#Sec11}
--------------------

The mean values of these parameters were recorded over five days and ANOVA followed by Duncan's multiple range tests were performed on the data (SAS version 9.1) to find the difference at 5% (P ≤ 0.05) level. Simultaneously, the percentage survival of spawn in the different groups of each challenge treatment was recorded daily over 7 days.

### Results {#Sec12}

There were changes in ACP activity, total protein content, lysozyme activity, bactericidal activity and superoxide anion assay in different glucan treated/ untreated groups of *A testudineus* spawns, though the number of leucocytes were adjusted to a fixed level of 10^5^ cells ml^-1^.

The total protein content of cell suspension lysate was significantly increased in Group C fish after 3 h β-glucan post-treatment (Figure [1](#Fig1){ref-type="fig"}). There was significant increase in protein content in Groups B and C after day 3 post-challenge with *S. paracitica.* However, the protein content was reduced significantly in Groups B and C after day 5 post-challenge. In case of group D fish the protein content was higher than the control group of fish.Figure 1**Pre-challenge and post-challenge total protein (mgml**^**-1**^**) content of the cell suspension collected after different time of exposure with betaglucan.** Bars represent pooled mean values. **A**, 0 mgl^-1^ glucan: **B**, 5 mgl^-1^ glucan: **C**, 10 mgl^-1^ glucan: **D**, 15 mgl^-1^ glucan. Bars bearing common superscript are not significant at 5% level in comparison to each other (n = 6).

The lysozyme enzyme activity was significantly increased in groups B and D after 3h exposure to β-glucan over control. There was a significant increase in lysozyme activity in Group B and D over the control on day 5 post-challenge treatment with *S. parasitica* (Figure [2](#Fig2){ref-type="fig"}). However, the lysozyme enzyme activity was significantly decreased in Group C invariable of treatment with β-glucan and post- challenge with *S. parasitica.*Figure 2**Pre-challenge and post-challenge lysozyme (Ul**^**-1**^**) content of the cell suspension collected after different time of exposure with betaglucan.** Bars represent pooled mean values. **A**, 0 mgl^-1^ glucan: **B**, 5 mgl^-1^ glucan: **C**, 10 mgl^-1^ glucan: **D**, 15 mgl^-1^ glucan. Bars bearing common superscript are not significant at 5% level in comparison to each other (n = 6).

A significant increase in bactericidal activity was observed in Groups B and C exposed for 3 h in β-glucan suspension as compared to control (Figure [3](#Fig3){ref-type="fig"}). However, the bactericidal activity was significantly reduced in all the groups on day 3 and day 5 of post-challenge treatment with *S. parasitica* over the control group expect for Group C on day 5 post-challenge treatment which showed a significant increase in bactericidal activity.Figure 3**Pre-challenge and post-challenge bactricidal (%) activity of the cell suspension collected after different time of exposure with betaglucan.** Bars represent pooled mean values. **A**, 0 mgl^-1^ glucan: **B**, 5 mgl^-1^ glucan: **C**, 10 mgl^-1^ glucan: **D**, 15 mgl^-1^ glucan. Bars bearing common superscript are not significant at 5% level in comparison to each other (n = 6).

The leucocyte cell suspension of spawns of *Anabas* showed a marginal increase in superoxide anion activity in groups exposed to 3 h β-glucan over the control group. There was a significant increase in superoxide anion activity in Groups C and D on day 3 post-challenge treatment with *S. parasitica.* Similarly, significant increase was observed in all the Groups (B,C, D) on day 5 post-challenge treatment with *S. parasitica* (Figure [4](#Fig4){ref-type="fig"})*.*Figure 4**Pre-challenge and post-challenge NBT (O.D.) activity of the cell suspension collected after different time of exposure with beta-glucan.** Bars represent pooled mean values. **A**, 0 mgl^-1^ glucan: **B**, 5 mgl^-1^ glucan: **C**, 10 mgl^-1^ glucan: **D**, 15 mgl^-1^ glucan. Bars bearing common superscript are not significant at 5% level in comparison to each other (n = 6).

The AcP activity recorded a marginal increase in Group C (9.83%) over the control group after 3 h β-glucan exposure in pre-challenge treatment. There was significant increase in the AcP activity in Group B on day 3 post-challenge treatment with *S. parasitica.* Groups C and D recorded an increase of 23.75% and 19.28% respectively over the control group A on day 3 post-challenge treatment (Figure [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}). The AcP activity was significantly increased in all groups (B,C,D) on day 5 post-challenge treatment over the control group A.Figure 5**Pre-challenge and post-challenge acid phosphatase (Ul**^**-1**^**) activity of the cell suspension collected after different time of exposure with beta-glucan.** Bars represent pooled mean values. **A**, 0 mgl^-1^ glucan: **B**, 5 mgl^-1^ glucan: **C**, 10 mgl^-1^ glucan: **D**, 15 mgl^-1^ glucan. Bars bearing common superscript are not significant at 5% level in comparison to each other (n = 6).

The survivability percentage of post challenge treatment group is indicated in Figure [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}. It was noticed that survival percentage was maximum in Group D fish exposed to 3 h post immersion with β--glucan suspension after day 7 (Figure [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}). Survivability was only 12.5 percent in control groups.Figure 6**Percent survival of spawn after immersion challenge with*Saprolegnia parasitica*(n = 32). A**, 0 mgl^-1^ glucan: **B**, 5 mgl^-1^ glucan: **C**, 10 mgl^-1^ glucan: **D**, 15 mgl^-1^ glucan.

Discussion {#Sec13}
==========

The present work demonstrates the effect of multiple immersion dosages of β-glucan suspension on immune response and disease resistance in *A. testudineus* spawns against a fungal pathogen *Saprolegnia parasitica*.

As a first line of defense, mucous, epithelium from skin, gills and intestine and various peptides, lysozomal enzymes, complement factors and other lytic factors present in the serum prevent adherence and colonization of microorganisms (Alexander & Ingram [@CR1]), resulting in the prevention of infection and diseases. In addition, macrophages which are innate immune cells present at hatching stage (Baulny et al. [@CR2]) and innate immune factors constitute a second barrier against invading pathogens. The enhancements of lysozyme activity complement activity and bactericidal activity due to administration of β-glucan for a longer duration have been reported (Trinder [@CR32] Doumas et al. [@CR13] Bradford [@CR4] Dalmo et al. [@CR11]). The effect of β-glucan on immunity and survival of *Anabas testudineus* against *A. hydrophila* was studied by Das et al. ([@CR12]). Based on previous observations, for exposure durations of 2 h and 3 h, it was found that the exposure of *A. testudineus* spawn to β-glucan at 10mgl^-1^ for 3 h followed by challenge with *A. hydrophila* provided better immunity and protection (Das et al. [@CR12]). The present study was undertaken to document, the effect of β-glucan suspension on immune response and disease resistance of early stages of fish against fungal pathogen *S. parasitica*.

It has been shown that injection of laminarina β-1, 3 glucan typical of those present in fungal cell walls, induces immune responses in both adult and larval locusts (Goldsworthy et al. [@CR15]; Mullen and Goldsworthy [@CR25]). According to them, the activation of immune response varies in emerging adult as that of mature adults.

The total protein content of the cell suspension was found to change upon exposure to β glucan suspension of various concentrations over 3 h exposures as reported by Das et al. ([@CR12]). Following challenge with *S. parasitica*, the protein concentration was increased in all the groups as compared to control on day 3 and decreased significantly in groups B and C on day 7.

There was increase in lysozyme activity in all the treatment groups as compared to the control as reported in our previous work (Das et al. [@CR12]). The post- challenge groups of fishes showed increased lysozomal enzymes but the increase was marginal as compared to challenge with *A. hydrophila*(Das et al. [@CR12]). This indicates that lysozomal enzymes produced by the leucocytic cell suspension may be spared to counter act the fungal challenge.

Bactericidal activity of cell suspension was also increased upon exposure to 3 h β-glucan suspension at all doses but decreased followed by post challenge fish on day 3 and day 7 except experimental group C on day 7. Increased bactericidal activity was reported by Das et al. ([@CR12]) following β-glucan immunostimulation. Interestingly, *A. hydrophila* post-challenge increased the bactericidal activity (Das et al. [@CR12]) and *S. parasitica* post-challenge decreased the bactericidal activity. Such decreased bactericidal properties of fish cell suspension involved in some innate and/or adaptive immune response are depressed in the cell suspension at the early stages which are utilized to fight against fungal infection.

Interestingly there is a rise in total NBT positive cells after exposure of β-glucan suspension for 3 h followed by fungal infection as reported with bacterial challenge (Das et al. [@CR12]). Misra *et al.*([@CR21]) reported a peak O~2~^-^ production during the NBT assay after feeding β--glucan at a dose of 500 mg kg^-1^ diet for 42 days. The role of β-glucan in our study was visible from the mortality pattern in the spawn for 7 days post challenge with *S. parasitica* which could be attributed to the increased activities of different peptides (Couso et al. [@CR10]; Misra et al. [@CR21]). Post challenged group showed increased phosphatase activities indicates higher breakdown of energy reserves, which was utilized by the growth and survival of fish (Das et al. [@CR12]). Though, the acidphosphatase activity was decreased in prechallenged glucan stimulation at 5 and 15 mg ml^-1^ which might be corroborated with the findings of Sahu et al. ([@CR31]) and Das et al. ([@CR12]).

Exposure of β-glucan at different dosages in our study showed reduced mortality on the fish on the 7th day post challenge through bath immersion with the fungal *pathogen S. parasitica*. The protective effect of β-glucan against the fungus noticed in the challenge study irrespective of dosages. Further, it can be inferred from the bath challenge study that the increased protection against the fungus could be due to the enhanced immunity as evidenced by the increase in different immune parameters of the leucocytes cell suspension.

It is thus evident from the present experiment that β-glucan also protect the fish from fungal infection of *S. parasitica* at the 10 and 15 mgl^-1^ concentrations exposure for 3 h as noticed from the survival rate. But in earlier work, we have reported that β-glucan at a dose of 10 mgl^-1^ for 3 h is sufficient enough for giving protection against *Aeromonas hydrophila* infection. Though 15 mgl^-1^ gives little higher survival but 10 mgl^-1^ is equally good enough for protection (60% and 50% respectively). Especially spawn of 8 days old receives protection to both the bacteria and fungi and increased nonspecific immunity as evidenced from the leucocytes suspension parameters. This will have a great impact in the nursery phase rearing of this species where spawns could be exposed to glucan suspension for preventing loss due to fungal and bacterial infections and will provide healthy spawn for grow out culture practices to the farmers.

**Competing interests**

The authors wish to state that there are no conflicting interests in the preparation and presentation of this article.

**Authors' contributions**

BKD designed and supervised experiment and corrected the manuscript. PP analyzed samples and also done statistical analysis. CD and DKS maintain the spawns and pathogens for challenge. JP analyzed sample, drafted and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

The authors are gratefully acknowledged the Director, Central Institute of Freshwater Aquaculture for providing all possible assistance and cooperation for conducting this investigation.