System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
[Instruction]
Description: Given a narrative think of the most related proverb. Input: The group of girls sat merrily around, knitting their scarves and hats.  Each girl proudly showed the others of their success.  Some had bright and bold colors, while others used muted tones and gentle patterns.  When it was Jane's turn to show her work, she held up a poorly knitted scarf, with many stitches missed.  \"It's not my fault,\" she whined, \"these knitting needles are terrible!\"

[Ground truth Answer]
A poor workman always blames his tools

[Assistant's Response]
In the narrative provided, Jane's reaction to her poorly knitted scarf exemplifies a common human tendency to deflect blame rather than acknowledge personal shortcomings. A highly relevant proverb for this scenario is: "A bad workman blames his tools." This saying highlights the idea that individuals often attribute their failures to external factors, such as the quality of their tools, instead of recognizing their own role in the outcome.

In this context, Jane's excuse about her knitting needles serves as a metaphor for how people can sometimes evade responsibility for their mistakes. Instead of accepting that her knitting skills may need improvement, she chooses to focus on the tools she used. This proverb serves as a reminder that accountability is crucial for personal growth and that blaming external circumstances can hinder one's ability to learn from experiences.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: