I need you to generate a Doctorate level response for me.

I have a Phd.. level project on International Business and Strategy and the brief goes thus:
The organisation of your choice is planning to expand its footprint in a new country (selected in CW1). Please prepare a report explaining “how” this internationalisation initiative can be implemented by analysing the layers of business environment, plausible strategic choice(s) and propose a suitable method for strategy implementation.
The chosen organisation should be the same as in CW1.
[This is a continuation of the internationalisation strategy analysis of your organisation of choice from CW1 where you answered the “why”, “what”, “where” and “how” questions for the past/existing internationalisation initiative followed by your proposal for a new internationalisation initiative. Now you are going to analyse the implementation of this strategy (the “how” question) in CW2]

Tasks:
Demonstration of analytical skills of working with data and problem-solving
Provide evidence of critical approach in your writing
Skilful and critical application of the theoretical models/concepts to address the assessment task
Use of a wide range of credible academic and professional sources to develop arguments
Demonstrate an evidence of wider reading and research
Use of relevant and up-to-date information on the chosen company

Format:
Maximum word limit of 3,500 words, excluding title page, executive summary, table of content, references and appendixes.
An executive summary of NOT MORE than 250 words
An up–to–date information on the chosen organisation
A clear identification of the main ideas and issues involved
The development of those ideas and associated arguments
Please use appropriate theory/theories and frameworks to support your argument (but remember, more is NOT always better!)
Clearly defined introduction and conclusion
Logically structured and concisely written text
Use of relevant and up-to-date information on the chosen company
Correctly and appropriately referenced
Evidence of wider reading
All the relevant figures and tables should be embedded in the running text in the appropriate position

Suggested Structure:
Title page – Module and CW2 title, tutor name, student ID number
Table of contents
Executive summary – max 250 words

Introduction and a brief background (approx. 250 words) – this follows up from the new internationalisation initiative you proposed in CW1. Why do you think internationalisation will be beneficial? Internationalisation motives

Situation analysis (approx. 1000 words) – critically evaluate the strategic position at macro, industry/sector and organisational level to support the rationale for choosing the target country/region. Macro environment (PESTLE), Industry/sector analysis (5F), Internal analysis (RBV/VRIO or VRIN), Summarising through SWOT.

Analysis of strategic choices (approx. 1200 words) – identify strategic choices for the foreign market entry. Please use organisation’s internationalisation strategy as the benchmark (refer to CW1), can they follow the same strategy? Was/is there any learning especially from a not so successful attempt? How do the competitors internationalise in the same market? Value proposition for this internationalisation initiative. What are you proposing to offer to the customers? Generic strategies OR strategy clock AND/OR interactive strategies, What could be the potential differentiation with the existing competitors? Can you analyse this with some examples? Depending on the organisation, one can study how this business strategy can contribute to corporate level strategy choice, Based on the above analysis what is the best international strategy to adopt (e.g. B-G matrix with support from Porter’s diamond and international value chain)?

Strategy implementation (approx. 1000 words) – how can the chosen strategy be implemented? Do you foresee any challenges? How do you propose to address these? Entry mode, why is this the preferred mode? What could be potential challenges? What could be potential risk mitigation strategies?

Conclusion (approx. 50 words)

The criteria for marking:
Your report will be marked based on the following criteria:
Analysis and critical evaluation
Application of appropriate theoretical framework(s)
Evidence of research and referencing (Harvard style)
Presentation

The following table shows the criteria and weighting used to award the final grade for your report.
Criteria
Introduction and context setting -5%
Application of theory and frameworks- 30%
Analysis and critical evaluation - 30%
Evidence of research and referencing- 15%
Overall structure and presentation - 15%
Conclusion and recommendations - 5%

Overall, the whole write-up must show very high standard work with most of the following features:  authoritative subject knowledge; a high level of critical analysis and evaluation; incisive original thinking;  commendable originality;  exceptionally well researched, with a very high level of technical competence;  high quality presentation;  impressive clarity of ideas;  excellent coherence and logic.  Work is close to the forefront of the subject and may be close to publishable or exhibitable quality.  Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level.  Referencing is consistently used, complete and accurate, plus demonstrates exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence; work is virtually flawless and has potential to influence the forefront of the subject and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality.  Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. Exceptional achievement distinguishable even amongst the best quality work and deserving of the highest possible marks within the Distinction grade.
Use any and every international Business Theory, model and framework most applicable

Ensure to use only the most recent out of the most relevant references
Note, The structure is below:
Executive Summary

ExxonMobil, a leading global oil and gas company, has demonstrated its ability to achieve competitive advantage through technological capabilities, vast resources, and strategic internationalization activities. As the company seeks to further expand its global footprint, this report proposes a new internationalization initiative for ExxonMobil in Ukraine. The proposed expansion is centered on investing in exploration, production, and marketing activities while leveraging the company’s competitive advantage and adapting to the local business environment.

1. Introduction and Background

1.1 Introduction
The ongoing geopolitical situation, coupled with Ukraine’s growing economy and untapped oil and gas resources, presents an attractive business opportunity for ExxonMobil. This report discusses the rationale for expanding into Ukraine, considering factors such as motive, resource availability, competitive landscape, and market demand.

1.2 Background
ExxonMobil’s strong financial performance and global presence have laid the groundwork for further expansion. The company’s extensive experience in internationalization gives ExxonMobil a solid foundation for entering new markets.

2. Situation Analysis

2.1 Macro Environment (PESTLE Analysis)
A comprehensive analysis of the political, economic, social, technological, legal, and environmental factors impacting ExxonMobil’s expansion into Ukraine will be conducted.

2.2 Industry/Sector Analysis (Five Forces Framework)
This section will evaluate the competitive landscape in the Ukrainian oil and gas industry, examining aspects such as competitive rivalry, threats of new entrants, threats of substitutes, buyer and supplier power.

2.3 Organizational Analysis (RBV/VRIO or VRIN)
An analysis of ExxonMobil’s internal resources and capabilities using the Resource-Based View (RBV) or the VRIO/VRIN framework will be performed to identify the company’s value-adding activities.

2.4 SWOT Analysis
This section will summarize the key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats identified in the situation analysis, providing a concise overview of the factors impacting ExxonMobil’s expansion into Ukraine.

3. Analysis of Strategic Choices

3.1 Internationalization Strategy Benchmark
The report will consider the alignment of the current internationalization strategy with the proposed expansion and analyze lessons learned from past experiences.

3.2 Competitor Analysis
The competitive landscape in Ukraine will be analyzed to identify potential differentiation opportunities for ExxonMobil.

3.3 Value Proposition
A unique value proposition will be developed, incorporating generic strategies or strategy clock and interactive strategies.

3.4 International Strategy Selection
The report will discuss which international strategy is best suited for the Ukrainian market, using the B-G matrix, Porter’s Diamond, and the international value chain as support.

4. Strategy Implementation

4.1 Entry Mode
The preferred entry mode for ExxonMobil’s expansion into Ukraine will be discussed, along with its rationale, potential challenges, and risk mitigation strategies.

4.2 Partnership Formation and Local Adaptation
Considerations for forming partnerships with local organizations and adapting operations to local requirements will be discussed.

4.3 Technological Investment
This section will explore the investments required in technology and research to ensure the success of the proposed expansion.

4.4 Regulatory Compliance
The report will address the need for compliance with local regulations, highlighting potential challenges and strategies for navigating the regulatory landscape.

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, ExxonMobil’s proposed expansion into Ukraine presents an opportunity to further extend its international operations and capitalize on the untapped oil and gas resources within the country. By analyzing the business environment, strategic choices, and strategy implementation, the report provides a comprehensive structure for ExxonMobil to effectively expand its footprint into Ukraine, taking into account potential challenges and opportunities. By leveraging its competitive advantages, adaptability, and strategic focus, ExxonMobil can successfully establish itself in the Ukrainian market and contribute to the overall growth of the company’s international portfolio.















Now, In 500 words, generate the 2.3 and 2.4 sub-sections. Ensure your response shows all of the following, including a proper Harvard Referencing Style in-text citations everywhere appropriate
Demonstration of analytical skills of working with data and problem-solving
Provide evidence of critical approach in your writing, using arguments in the form of "According to so and so which said this, in contrast to so and so which said that", "therefore, we can infer that..."
Skilful and critical application of the theoretical models/concepts to address the assessment task
Use of a wide range of credible academic and professional sources to develop arguments
Demonstrate an evidence of wider reading and research
Use of relevant and up-to-date information on the chosen company