You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Beauty Without Cruelty Rosemary Mint Tea Tree Shampoo doesn't lather well because it doesn't have any artificial lathering ingredients in it; lots of foam and bubbles are not necassary to have a clean head, it is just something we have all come to expect after years of using mainstream products, we think lather and bubbles = clean.

We have been using this shampoo exclusively for almost a year now and love it. It was one of the best rated tea tree shampoos I could find in terms of chemicals and harmful ingredients; everything in this shampoo is natural and some ingredients are organic. If I recall the only potential irritants are the fragrances/essential oils that may irritate some but not all people. I love the smell of this shampoo and have found that it leaves me with nice clean hair without leaving any residue like others do. Also love the conditioner. 4 stars because it is a bit expensive.

I wanted to try the Beauty Without Cruelty Rosemary Mint Tea Tree shampoo because I was looking for a more natural shampoo that doesn't contain any harsh ingredients and toxic chemicals. I decided to try their shampoo after reading the label and saw that it contained only natural and organic ingredients.

At first I was skeptical that a shampoo that contained only natural ingredients would work, but I gave it a try hoping it would meet my expectations. Well, the Beauty Without Cruelty Rosemary Mint Tea tree shampoo smells great and it looks like the same consistency as other shampoos but it didn't do as well as job as it advertises.

The Beauty Without Cruelty Rosemary Mint Tea Tree shampoo didn't lather up as well as other shampoos and the shampoo easily slipped through my fingers when I poured it onto my hands. I ended up using more shampoo than necessary and felt that most of it washed out too quickly. The scent is refreshing and not pungeant, but that's as far as it goes in making a quality shampoo. I wouldn't recommend this because it's a bit expensive and you'd have to end up using more than you need to.

I have tried this version of the BWC shampoo line along with the blue clean and purple volumizing kind. Out of all the versions, i think this probably smells the best. Granted, don't expect this rosemary mint shampoo to smell like pantene or be perfumy. It does remind me of the apothecary, but I don't thnk think it smells bad in any way. This version (along with the volumizing shampoo) is probably the least harsh of the three shampoos. I think the blue clean version can be a bit harsh and tends to strip more of your hair's natural oil (ie. drier hair). The rosemary mint conditoner is pretty good too (and smells similar to the shampoo...so you'll match in scent). BWC is a good brand and it's relatively cheap. This shampoo doesn't have SLS (which can be hard to find at times). It also doesn't paraben. If you want a decently priced shampoo without controversial ingredients, this might be the shampoo for you. At least I think it's worth the try. Granted the smell may not be for everyone.

I absolutely love this shampoo for multiple reasons. First, it smells divine. (It should, it's Aromatherapy hair care!) It's organic, it's natural, it's gentle...all great points. And for the price, I think it's a great deal. You get 16 ounces of goodness...no animal products, no parabens, no sodium lauryl sulfates, and it is 100% vegetarian and made with 100% pure organic essential oils! But best of all, and most important, my hair loves it. It's soft, feels very clean but never stripped, and the shampoo rinses out quickly. It doesn't seem to leave any residue on my hair, which is very important to me because I have long, curly hair that can easily get weighed down. Overall, I love that this is a product that I can feel good about using, both because of the company ethos and the fact that I don't have to worry about unhealthy ingredients. I used to use salon brands, but have developed a sensitivity to chemical fragrances, and thankfully, I have no problems with the natural scents used in this shampoo.