Ты профессиональный журналист и тебе в руки попадает новость. 
Твоя задача используя эту новость, максимально сжато, но не теряя основных моментов, написать о ней. 
Сделай бросающийся в глаза заголовок. Сделай стилизацию MarkdownV2. Обязательно сделай заголовок жирным. Не добавляй смайлики, делай логические абзацы. 
Пожалуйста, ничего не добавляй от себя, напиши только эту статью. 
Пожалуйста, дай ответ на русском языке.
Обязтально сделай разделитель между заголовком и контентом таким символом "--content--".
Размер статьи вместе с названием не должен превышать 1024 символа.
Вот сам текст статьи:  
 US laws regulating AI prove elusive, but there may be hope | TechCrunch 
 Can the U.S. meaningfully regulate AI? It’s not at all clear yet. Policymakers have achieved progress in recent months, but they’ve also had setbacks, illustrating the challenging nature of laws imposing guardrails on the technology.In March, Tennessee But the U.S. still lacks a federal AI policy comparable to the After a protracted battle with special interests, Governor Newsom There’s reason for optimism, however, according to Jessica Newman, co-director of the AI Policy Hub at UC Berkeley. Speaking on a panel about AI governance at “We often hear about the U.S. being this kind of ‘Wild West’ in comparison to what happens in the EU,” Newman said, “but I think that is overstated, and the reality is more nuanced than that.”To Newman’s point, the Federal Trade Commission has President Joe Biden has also attempted to get certain AI rules on the books. Roughly a year ago, Biden One consequence of the executive order was the U.S. AI Safety Institute (AISI), a federal body that studies risks in AI systems. Operating within the Yet, the AISI could be wound down with a simple repeal of Biden’s executive order. In October, a “I think that all of us, as Americans, share an interest in making sure that we mitigate the potential downsides of technology,” AISI director Elizabeth Kelly, who also participated in the panel, said.So is there hope for comprehensive AI regulation in the States? The failure of SB 1047, which Newman described as a “light touch” bill with input from industry, isn’t exactly encouraging. Authored by California State Senator Scott Wiener, SB 1047 was opposed by many in Silicon Valley, including high-profile technologists like Meta’s chief AI scientist, Yann LeCun.This being the case, Wiener, another Disrupt panelist, said he wouldn’t have drafted the bill any differently — and he’s confident broad AI regulation will eventually prevail.“I think it set the stage for future efforts,” he said. “Hopefully, we can do something that can bring more folks together, because the reality all of the large labs have already acknowledged is that the risks [of AI] are real and we want to test for them.”Indeed, Anthropic last week Opponents have only doubled down on their rhetoric. Last Monday, Khosla Ventures founder Vinod Khosla Newman posits, though, that pressure to unify the growing state-by-state patchwork of AI rules will ultimately yield a stronger legislative solution. In lieu of consensus on a model of regulation, state policymakers have “My sense is that companies don’t want an environment of a patchwork regulatory system where every state is different,” she said, “and I think there will be increasing pressure to have something at the federal level that provides more clarity and reduces some of that uncertainty.”