gpt, tell, is it legal from openai perspective if thirdparty service gathers user data from chatgpt but with user consent? but how if free service gathers private encrypted chat with gpt but with user consent? how it could be legal in any form if communication goes through openai gpt system, not their own third party proprietary ai system? 
anyway, I think that something not right here. here’s their user consent for this specific chat: “GPT-4 Turbo: Research Preview (128K token limit, Short-Term Availability)
If this app doesn’t respond, it’s likely due to our API key hitting the daily limit of our organization. Consider trying our GPT-3.5 app:
https://huggingface.co/spaces/yuntian-deng/ChatGPT
User Consent for Data Collection, Use, and Sharing ▼

By using our app, which is powered by OpenAI’s API, you acknowledge and agree to the following terms regarding the data you provide:

Collection: We may collect information, including the inputs you type into our app, the outputs generated by OpenAI’s API, and certain technical details about your device and connection (such as browser type, operating system, and IP address) provided by your device’s request headers.
Use: We may use the collected data for research purposes, to improve our services, and to develop new products or services, including commercial applications, and for security purposes, such as protecting against unauthorized access and attacks.
Sharing and Publication: Your data, including the technical details collected from your device’s request headers, may be published, shared with third parties, or used for analysis and reporting purposes.
Data Retention: We may retain your data, including the technical details collected from your device’s request headers, for as long as necessary.

By continuing to use our app, you provide your explicit consent to the collection, use, and potential sharing of your data as described above. If you do not agree with our data collection, use, and sharing practices, please do not use our app.”“Here are some key points from the notice:”. why did you reoutputted the same text? but for watsup then consent is the same from facebook? because gpt is different kind of technology that needs absolutely different data Sharing, Collection, and Retention rules. I think that here’s something very not right. “If you believe there is something “not right” or potentially non-compliant about a service’s data practices, it would be important to:

1. Review the service’s privacy policy and terms of service in detail.
2. Compare these policies with the legal requirements of data protection laws relevant to the service.
3. If necessary, raise concerns with the service provider or seek advice from a legal professional who can provide guidance based on the specifics of the situation.”. no, I don’t want to read walls of text, just saying. because from one point user placing or might place a lot of effort to create something through third party openai’s gpt nlp ai chat, and then someone simply “steals” that data even with a user consent. this is not right. “it’s within your rights to choose not to use that service”. this is not the way, gpt. because this kind of third party services for chatgpts is free services which used by people that cannot afford buying a subscription from in openai site, for example. also, ai producing code which could be partially proprietary by some company as well, if user drops that code inside this third party chatgpt. also, if user will share some private information, it the same not right. something generally not right here, gpt, need to fix that from openai perspective.