Given multiple reviews about 1939 movie Gone with the Wind, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['No other movie makes me more divided.. I watched GWTW for the first time in the late 90\'s. I have to admit that as teenager I was quite disappointed. This is considered one of THE movies of all time and I found it hard to enjoy for a number of reasons. The lead: Scarlett O\'Hara is not a likable character. She is selfish and egocentric and just mostly annoying. Since then I have to a degree learned to enjoy a little bit her will power but the character will always remain a disappointment to me. "Edit 210810: Since writing this review I have realized that Victor Fleming wanted Scarlett to be depicted in a quite bad way since she was a Southerner. I never thought of that before and that makes sense.. It doesn\'t change my opinion about the movie but I understand why its lead is what she is. End edit" The acting: I know it was the melodramatic way in those days but it\'s just not natural. First few scenes I watched I could hardly believe it since they felt SO overplayed. Since then I have watched a lot more old movies and learned to accept it but still.. Ashley: Leslie Howard was a great actor but miscast here and he felt so himself. According to several sources he was also completely indifferent. To this day I can\'t understand that David O\'Selznick thought that was the best choice for the part. But there are of course also reasons why this probably is the most famous movie of all time. The photo/scenery: for 1939 nothing short of absolutely sensational. Hard to believe really and decades before it\'s time. The soundtrack: also, put into context, one of the greatest of all time. To a degree, the story: yes it is a "civil war soap opera" but the story is quite ok and some of the characters rather interesting. So.. since that first viewing I have actually come to enjoy it for what it is. It will never be a favorite but it fascinates me more than many other movies. Of course I have to finish talking a little bit about the racism issues because of BLM as well. I get it. I get what annoys people about this movie. Still.. I feel that the criticism is exaggerated and IS exaggerated because of the fame and praise for this movie. Because I don\'t feel blacks are badly portrayed or mistreated in an unacceptable way. Ok, I know they complain about stereotypical portrayal and "happy slaves" but I don\'t really agree actually.. loyal servants more than slaves, absolutely, but happy? Was that kind of relationship never the case in any household? Were slaves always treated badly by their owners and beaten etc.? In some cases, absolutely, but who wanted to watch that in 1939? Would it have been a better option to show the owners torturing their slaves than showing a decent relationship? To me, I doubt it.. And the movie is still set during the civil wat so there WERE slaves.. as tragic as that fact is. I know that Selznick put a lot of effort in trying not to affend anyone and I think he did a decent job no matter the criticism of today. By the way, you can also argue for the fact that Southerners were portrayed as naive and smug going into that war with such limited resources and also that the Yankees were bloodthirsty barbarians who just killed everyone in their way. About that there is not much talk.. Finally.. to put things in perspective there is one other classic movie that I will never watch because of its obvious racism and that is "Birth of a Nation". From what I have learned it\'s unacceptable even by 1915 standards. GWTW has its flaws but it\'s not even close to that level and again, considering it was made 1939 I think it is a decent watch on all levels. '] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.