System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
Message to client for accepting offer for summary video

[Ground truth Answer]
Subject: Summary Video Project - Offer Acceptance

Dear [Client's Name],

I hope this message finds you in good spirits. I am thrilled to inform you that I have accepted your offer to create a summary video for your [project/business/event]. Your vision and requirements have captured my interest, and I am eager to showcase my skills and deliver a captivating video that effectively conveys your message.

In order to ensure a smooth workflow and timely completion, kindly provide me with all necessary materials, guidelines, and references you deem essential to the project. Additionally, please share any specific deadlines and milestones you have in mind so that I can plan my work accordingly. My goal is to exceed your expectations and ensure your satisfaction.

Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any further instructions, questions, or concerns. You may contact me via email at [Your Email Address] or on my phone at [Your Contact Number]. I am looking forward to working with you and creating an engaging summary video that will truly resonate with your audience.

Thank you for entrusting me with this opportunity. Let's make this project a success!

Best regards,

[Your Name]

[Assistant's Response]
Subject: Exciting News: Your Offer for the Summary Video!

Dear [Client's Name],

I hope this message finds you well! I’m thrilled to inform you that we are ready to move forward with your offer for the summary video. We truly appreciate your trust in us and are excited to bring your vision to life.

If you have any specific details or ideas you’d like us to incorporate, please feel free to share them, and we’ll get started right away!

Looking forward to collaborating with you!

Best regards,  
[Your Name]  
[Your Position]  
[Your Company]  
[Your Contact Information]

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: