Please correct for  punctuation, grammar and spelling in the following email. Choose the most appropriate word to convey the same message and intent. Hi Frank,

I hope you had a good day. Mine was okich if you see what I mean. Here are the main highlights of my day as I noted them down.

We raised 3 queries with the data team. One is related to the duplicates we found but couldn’t identify the reason for their existence. The second is to do with having more entities in the RDS compared to the ICL list we previously received so we want to understand why there is such a high discrepancy. The last query is to do with the missing flag on default reason. 

There are a few checks I will probably need to do myself. These include using the MCL & RMAT to make sure all entities were brought in as required. We’ll review the DQ once it’s made available by the data team, and I need to write the draft report as previously discussed. 

I made a list of high-level checks we are undertaking, these include variable names, format, coverage (not to the extend that JS is doing and more especially the ones he’s not doing) and noting whether variable is in the data set or not. This was to help with the stand up.

Unfortunately, AP was off sick again today. RZ made the decision to put DS as lead for the project and AP will take charge of something else once he’s fully recovered. This also means I will be reporting to DS. So, we need to make the arrangement for regular 121 and check-in which are overdue. Not sure where that would leave RL. I bring this up because the idea I discussed with AP was that eventually, she’d be reporting to me. Now, that’s also something to discuss with DS, I suppose. You’ll be happy to hear that I gave an update on our task today although I was probably too fast when speaking. I need to work on this so in tomorrow stand up I do a better job.

Other things worth mentioning. I’ve started to put together a cross-check I’ll be working against to ensure all requirements are checked but also that I know which evidence we need to have. I’ve attached a draft for your interest. RL is trying to figure out why the default dates are missing quite a lot of records; it is likely an indication that those haven’t defaulted? I asked that she should first found out what missing means in this context. Parent grading date as well are missing for a lot of rows, but this might not be an issue as cascades won’t be directly use for modelling purposes.
  
I’ve discussed a tentative plan with RL today, but I’ll probably revisit that tomorrow when AB is back with us. Overall, I’d like us to complete all major tasks by the end of this week noting that RL is on leave this Friday. This will not include DQ from the data team even if they can complete it in the next 3 days. Alongside the report I need to write, I think for reproducibility purpose, we will need to record against each requirement how we have conducted the check. So, I’ve suggested we also put a document about our process. For instance, if a requirement need to validate using excel, and code we need to put the reference to the code and the excel file when feasible.
That’s it for me for today.
Speak tomorrow.
Berluoise