You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


45 F.3d 437NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appelleev.Vache NERCESSIAN, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-50229.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 8, 1994.*Decided Dec. 16, 1994.

Before:  BROWNING, GOODWIN, and FERGUSON, Circuit Judges.


1
MEMORANDUM**


2
Defendant Vache Nercessian pleaded guilty to wire fraud and conspiracy to commit wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. Secs. 1343 and 371.  He now appeals his sentence of 37 months in custody and the order that he pay $679,510.64 in restitution.  We affirm the sentence but vacate the restitution order and remand for further consideration of Nercessian's ability to make restitution.

I.

3
Defendant was the controller and purchasing manager of the Chipp Club Corporation, a "bust out" scheme to buy computer equipment on phony lines of credit and to resell the equipment without paying for it.


4
Defendant was indicted on 25 counts and arrested.  He eventually pled guilty on two counts of wire fraud and one count of conspiracy to commit wire fraud.  The plea agreement stated that the government would recommend a three-level reduction in the applicable guideline offense level for acceptance of responsibility, provided that the defendant would be completely truthful, forthcoming, and candid regarding all aspects of the offense.  However, the government discovered that while Defendant was released on bail pending sentencing, he sold some computer equipment that he had concealed from police searches and laundered the money.  Defendant had represented to his probation officer that the government had seized all of his assets at the time of his arrest and that he had no monthly income.  The government recommended that Defendant's bond be revoked, that the downward departure for acceptance of responsibility be denied, and that an increase of two levels for obstruction of justice be applied.  The sentencing judge agreed.


5
As noted, the sentence also ordered $679,510.64 in restitution to the victims of the scheme.

II.

6
Defendant claims that the District Court erred in denying him a downward adjustment for acceptance of responsibility and in applying a two-level increase for obstruction of justice.  We review a district court's sentencing determinations for clear error.  United States v. Rosales, 917 F.2d 1220, 1222 (9th Cir.1990);  United States v. Lofton, 905 F.2d 1315 (9th Cir.1990).

A.

7
The United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines Manual ("Guidelines") section 3C1.1 states that the offense level shall be increased by two levels "[i]f the defendant willfully obstructed or impeded, or attempted to obstruct or impede, the administration of justice during the investigation, prosecution, or sentencing of the instant offense...."  The enhancement applies to "providing materially false information to a probation officer in respect to a presentence or other investigation for the court."   Guidelines Sec. 3C1.1, Application Note 3.


8
When a defendant's misrepresentations to a probation officer could lead to an "inaccurate sentence computation" or to a "delay in ascertaining accurate information for the court," the court is justified in imposing a section 3C1.1 upward adjustment.  Lofton, 905 F.2d at 1317.


9
Our review of the record supports the sentencing judge's conclusion that Defendant's post-plea conduct and misrepresentations obstructed and impeded the administration of justice.

B.

10
Guidelines section 3E1.1 provides for a decrease in offense level if the defendant "clearly demonstrates acceptance of responsibility for his offense."   However, "[c]onduct resulting in an enhancement under Sec. 3C1.1 ... ordinarily indicates that the defendant has not accepted responsibility for his criminal conduct."   Guidelines Sec. 3E1.1, Application Note 4.


11
Furthermore, although entry of a guilty plea constitutes evidence of acceptance of responsibility, "this evidence may be outweighed by conduct of the defendant that is inconsistent with such acceptance of responsibility."   Guidelines Sec. 3E1.1, Application Note 3.  When a defendant's conduct conflicts with a verbal acceptance of responsibility, the actions are deemed to speak louder than the words.  Lofton, 905 F.2d at 1317.  Thus, the court may properly couple the upward adjustment with a denial of credit for acceptance of responsibility.


12
After Defendant entered his guilty plea and was supposedly cooperating with the authorities, Defendant concealed evidence from authorities and attempted to enjoy the fruits of his crime.  While extraordinary cases may exist in which obstructive conduct is not inconsistent with an acceptance of responsibility, this is a perfect example of actions speaking louder than words.  The sentencing judge's decision to deny a decrease for acceptance of responsibility was entirely proper.

III.

13
Defendant also claims that the sentencing judge failed to take into consideration Defendant's ability to pay when he ordered Defendant to make restitution to the victims of the scheme.  We review such orders for abuse of discretion.  United States v. Smith, 944 F.2d 618 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 112 S.Ct. 1515 (1991).


14
Authority to order a defendant to pay restitution to victims of any Title 18 offense is granted under 18 U.S.C. Secs. 3663 and 3664.  Future restitution may be ordered despite a defendant's present indigency.  United States v. Ramilo, 986 F.2d 333, 335 (9th Cir.1993).  A restitution order must be supported by some evidence of present or future ability to pay, such as financial resources and earning ability.  Id. at 334.  Section 3664 says the court "shall consider" a variety of factors, including the defendant's financial resources, financial needs, and earning capacity.  United States v. Newman, 6 F.3d 623 (9th Cir.1993).


15
Because the record shows that the sentencing judge believed he need not consider the defendant's ability to pay, we must remand for further findings.


16
For the foregoing reasons, we VACATE the restitution order, AFFIRM the sentence in all other respects, and REMAND.



*
 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for submission on the record and briefs and without oral argument.  Fed.R.App.P. 34(a);  Ninth Circuit Rule 34-4


**
 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3