Hey, this is an English text. I want you to translate it into the Tunisian dialect. Please follow these steps:
1. Translate step by step and highlight differences between Tunisian dialect and Modern Standard Arabic.
2. Highlight sections you are confident translating into the Tunisian dialect.
Translate this text into the Tunisian dialect, focusing on capturing the essence of the language nuances:

Sausage Ingredients This is the confession of an avowed longtime policy junkie. I love to watch (and advocate for) laws being made. The nuances of the language, the parrying of interest groups, the political jockeying of the legislators themselves, it all fascinates me. It’s often an ugly process. Most of you have heard the old Bismarck quote: “Laws are like sausages; it is better not to see them being made.” I’ve had the opportunity to work on advocacy efforts on a weird variety of topics including services for troubled youth, women’s issues, flood plain development and internet gambling. (I’ve rambled a bit in my career.) With much pleasure, I had the chance to found and chair the Interactive Gaming Council (IGC) from 1996 to 2004. In its heyday, this organization had over 120 companies as members and attempted to develop standards and do other things to position the fledgling industry. The fact that I chaired it as long as I did is not really a testament to my leadership but a function of an industry under siege. Our members, primarily offshore suppliers and operators, did not want to be the face of the industry for obvious reasons. As a publisher and event organizer, I had the freedom to do that. In its early days, the industry had few friends. Getting legislators to stick their necks out to advocate for the industry was nearly an impossible task… even under the guise of consumer protection. So shooting for proactive legislation was a pipe dream. The best we could hope for was fending off the prohibition bills routinely offered up by Senator Kyl and Representative Goodlatte, et al. In spite of being up against such idioms as “Click the Mouse, Lose the House,” we were able to hold them off for many years. But, as in the sausage-making analogy noted earlier, that was all undone in 2006, when the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (UIGEA) was passed literally in the dead of night. Called at the time the Frist Amendment (since it was a favor for Iowa Senator Bill Frist, who was running for president), this legislation shut down payments for iGaming. It did so with no hearings and in what those in the business called “a midnight drop,” quietly stuck into a “must pass” bill. So the industry has been living with this prohibition since 2006. There has obviously been some positive progress on the state level, with three states (New Jersey, Delaware and Nevada) leading the way to legalize iGaming. But progress has been painfully slow in the past year or so. One prospective state, California, has been introducing legislation to regulate online poker now for eight years with no forward movement. Most insiders point to ongoing wrangling among the land-based gaming interests as to who gets what slice of the pie as the reason for the impasse. Fights among card rooms, tribes and racetracks have impeded legalization. Now, fast-forward to the daily fantasy sports (DFS) controversies. Those of us who