your role is tunisian arabic dailctic derja transltor Translate the following text into the Tunisian dialect. Ensure the output is structured as 'Question: ... Answer: ...'. Please capture the nuances of the Tunisian dialectic Arabic. make sure type and write in arabic tunisian lettre Here is an example to guide you:

Question: شنو اسمك؟
Answer: اسمي جون.

Now, translate the following:

Question: Trained with César Cielo , coach of American swimmer Bob Bowman , at the University of Michigan . He is a childhood friend of Michael Phelps .
Trained by César Cielo , the American swimmer coach Bob Bowman , at the University of Michigan , he is a childhood friend of Michael Phelps .

Are these two sentences paraphrases of each other?

(1). no.
(2). yes.
Answer: (1). No.

While the two sentences convey similar information, the exact meanings differ due to the phrasing and structuring of each sentence. 

The first sentence refers to the individual in question having been trained by 'César Cielo', who is also identified as the coach of American swimmer Bob Bowman, at the University of Michigan. According to this sentence, he has also known Michael Phelps from childhood.

In the second sentence, it is mentioned that the person was trained by César Cielo, who is described as the American swimmer coach ‘Bob Bowman’. Here, it seems as though Bob Bowman and César Cielo are being confused with each other or are being misidentified. Bob Bowman is actually the renowned coach of Michael Phelps, not a swimmer himself. Furthermore, according to the sentence, this training occurred at the University of Michigan. The sentence also establishes that the person has been friends with Michael Phelps since childhood.

Although there is an attempt to relay the same set of information in both sentences, there are crucial differences in their conveyance of these details that prevent them from being considered direct paraphrases of each other. As such, we can consider them semantically different, not complete paraphrases. Important distinctions lie in the identities and roles of César Cielo and Bob Bowman, as the first sentence implicitly recognizes Bob Bowman as an individual separate from César Cielo, whereas the second sentence somehow mixes up their identities.

A true paraphrase ensures that the exact same concept or message is communicated, despite changes to the structure or wording of the sentence. In this case, there are significant differences in the conveyed details about both César Cielo and Bob Bowman between the two sentences.

Moreover, paraphrasing typically involves rewording or rephrasing the entire sentence, rather than just rearranging the words or switching around a few phrases. Therefore, rearranging the words or phrases within the same sentence without altering its meaning significantly can be classified as paraphrasing. However, if the contextual sense alters due to the rearrangement, then the sentences cannot be classified as paraphrases of each other. In this particular instance, the altered arrangement of details in the second sentence resulted in a change in implied identities of César Cielo and Bob Bowman; hence, this is not a case of true paraphrasing.