Format the following passage properly, for storytelling purposes. Keep it as written, don't change a single word, but improve grammar where necessary.

The Boys came, they saw...and got conquered. I still can't believe it, as I sit here and type these words. While the Cleveland Browns were indeed a good team in 1994, I had not given them much of a chance to go to Texas Stadium and defeat the two-time defending Super Bowl champion Dallas Cowboys. But sure enough, as I look at a little scrap of paper on which I scribbled down some statistics, that's exactly what happened. The final score reads Cleveland 43, Dallas 33, but even that is a bit misleading, as the Browns led 24-0 at the end of the first quarter and early into the second before the Cowboys got on the board with their first touchdown (plus a successful extra point from Boniol). Claiming home field advantage for themselves in the next CPU vs. CPU game of "Madden NFL '95," I take a look at the 'Players of the Game' and the numbers do not lie: they put in great work for Cleveland. #81, Michael Jackson--I point out his jersey number so as for there to be no confusion with the 'King of Pop'--had a quality day, with eleven catches for 296 yards and two receiving touchdowns. Anthony Pleasant proved most unpleasant to the Cowboys' offense, recording seven tackles and sacking Troy Aikman three times. Matt Stover was nearly perfect, connecting successfully on five of his six field goal attempts and going four for four on PATs; by himself, he accounted for nineteen of the 43 points scored by Cleveland, or 44%. Eric Metcalf didn't quite manage to 'out-Smith' Emmitt, but did well for himself with 101 rushing yards and one rushing touchdown. Last but not least, Vinny Testaverde proved more than serviceable with his offensive attack, going 27 for 59 with 455 passing yards and three TDs against one solitary interception; his counterpart Troy Aikman put up similar numbers, achieving a lower completion percentage and the same amount of touchdowns (3) and interceptions (1), while throwing for nearly 500 yards. Victorious in Dallas, the Browns took their show back home to good old Cleveland Municipal Stadium, where they prepared for a 'title defense' against a Tampa Bay Buccaneers team that was starting rookie Trent Dilfer at quarterback and went 6-10 during the actual '94 season. A very winnable game on paper, but that same paper reflects a jaw-dropping upset, for when the final whistle sounded it was Tampa Bay who emerged victorious by a final score of 52-24. The rookie Dilfer put up a respectable effort, going 22 for 64 with 542 passing yards, three touchdowns, and two picks. Eric Curry proved monstrous on defense, recording four tackles while sacking Vinny Testaverde on four separate occasions. Tony Stargell also did his part, recording fourteen tackles and picking off Vinny once. Michael Husted may have been the true MVP of the game, going a perfect ten for ten on FG tries and two for two on PATs; by himself, he accounted for 32 of Tampa's 52 points, or a whopping 61%. Courtney Hawkins had seven catches for 208 yards and one touchdown, but also had one drop. Vince Workman worked the Browns' run defense to his advantage, running to daylight whenever he found an opening; he finished with 121 rushing yards, but did not score a touchdown and fumbled the ball once. All of them together proved vital elements in Tampa upsetting the Browns, and it begs a question: do styles truly make games? Could Tampa defend their turf if they were to take on the Dallas Cowboys? Does Dallas deserve another shot so soon, or should another team--such as the Chargers, 49ers, or Bills--be given their opportunity? On second thought, I think it makes sense to let them all get cracks at Tampa. If Tampa gets through all of them, then they can face Dallas. It's going to take everything they have, but it is by no means impossible. But does a rookie Trent Dilfer have what it takes to beat Stan Humphries, Steve Young, Jim Kelly, and Troy Aikman in a row? Quite a gauntlet of QBs, to say the least. As Tampa prepares for their forthcoming 'defense' against a Chargers squad that was good enough to go to Super Bowl XXIX (though they fell well short against a historically excellent 49ers roster), I prepare to take a look at what the future holds for me, as I write this through a semi-mitigated cloud of fatigue. From what I understand, the JARC group home staff have been using up their accumulated vacation time throughout the month of August. One particular staff member, who normally works on weekday and Saturday mornings, is still away in Canada, and in her stead another lady has been helping out this week. Apparently, at the house where she normally works, they have the 'clients' get up at 4:00am, and since she is familiar with that, she has been having us get up at or around the same time here at the Joshua House. I have noticed that I have had some sleep troubles this week, and have taken steps to mitigate it (e.g., deleting time-wasting games and apps from my phone, drinking more water, getting more sleep). When I was at work today, I felt incredibly fatigued. There were times where it genuinely felt like my heart was going to burst out of my chest, but I did my best and got through it. When I got home, I had to nap for a while just to regain some energy. I am hoping that, at the next board meeting, an idea could be put up to a vote. My suggestion is for a rule to be enacted that none of the group home staff, across all the homes operated by JARC, are allowed to wake up the clients before 5:00am, unless special exceptions are granted on a client-by-client basis (and even then, they wouldn't be allowed to knock on the other clients' doors until 5:00am). Personally, I'd even push for 5:30am, but that might be too late a start as it leaves just a shade over two hours to take care of showering clients, cleaning the floors, washing/drying clothes, preparing breakfast, accounting for administrative particulars, etc. It is understandable for group home staff to be up at 4:00am, but I do not think it is fair for clients to be woken up that early, unless there are truly exceptional reasons for it (such as someone needing help with showering). Of course, there would need to be a system in place to keep the staff accountable, which may present its own set of challenges. A lot of things to think about...and, of course, I do not have a problem with just going to bed earlier. Still, I have to be willing to put myself on the line, and take the risks associated with starting honest perspectives. If we do not use our voices, we lose all our choices. "THE BOCA BLAC," I see on a piece of paper, turning the side on which I had written some game stats. "Disco Night at St," "Presented by Khem," "Sunday, July 14th, 2," "WITH PURCHASE OF $35 BAR CARD. CALL BO..." Half-thoughts abound, which had once been full. It is fascinating to think I was willing to deface something that could have potentially taken on remarkable historical significance in order to have scraps on which to account for these follies. The Boca Black Box does shows like this a lot, but we may get to a point in the next ten years where we see screens replacing humans, robot armies taking the place of trained performance troupes. I pray the day never comes. For now, I am grateful to have the opportunities I receive to see live performers honing their craft for the entertainment of hard-working men and women. As long as they are not being exploited in the process, I support it.