System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
[Instruction]
Determine whether the document supports or contradicts the given hypothesis. If there is no mention of it, output 'NotMentioned.'\n\n<Document>\nNON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT\nThis Agreement is made on day of , 20\nPARTIES:\nSINGAPORE ART MUSEUM, a company registered in Singapore under UEN No.: 201330746G having its office at 61 Stamford Road, #02-02, Stamford Court, Singapore 178892. (the Discloser)\nand\nRecipient Company, a company registered in Singapore under UEN No.: having its office at . (the Recipient)\nWHEREAS\nThe Discloser has engaged the Recipient for the purpose of Invitation to Tender: Managed Website Hosting Environment for Singapore Art Museum (SAM/ITT/2019/0002) . The Recipient would receive information from the Discloser during the course of their work via the Recipient’s corporate email address ___________________________________________________. (the Purpose)\nNOW IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS:\n1. Definitions – In this Agreement the following words are to have the following meanings:\n1.1 “Confidential Information” refers to:\n1.1.1 In respect of Information provided in documentary form or in other electronic form, Information which at the time of provision is marked or otherwise designated to show expressly or by necessary implication that is imparted in confidence;\n1.1.2 In respect of Information that is imparted orally, any Information that the Discloser or its representatives informed the Recipient at the time of disclosure was imparted in confidence;\n1.2 “Information” means but is not limited to information and data whether concerning commercial, financial, technical or any matter provided directly or indirectly by the Discloser to the Recipient in documentary form, orally, or other electronic form.\n1.3 “Permitted Purpose” or “the Purpose” means any such purposes which the Discloser has sought the services of the Recipient and includes but is not limited to the reviewing of contracts and documents.\n2. Confidentiality\n2.1 The Recipient undertakes to the Discloser to:\n2.1.1 Receive and keep the Confidential Information secret and confidential and not disclose such Confidential Information to any third party;\n2.1.2 Use the Confidential Information only for the Permitted Purpose; and\n2.1.3 Not disclose the Confidential Information to any other person without the Discloser’s written consent.\n2.1.4\n3. Exceptions\n3.1 The undertakings in clauses 2 above apply to all of the information disclosed by the Discloser to the Recipient, regardless of the way or form in which it is disclosed or recorded but they do not apply to:\n3.1.1 any information which is or in future comes into the public domain (unless as a result of the breach of this Agreement); or\n3.1.2 any information which is already known to the Recipient and which was not subject to any obligation of confidence before it was disclosed to the Recipient by the Discloser.\n4. Terminations of Services\n4.1 Upon the termination of the Recipient for the Purpose;\n4.1.1 The Recipient will, on request from the Discloser, return all copies and records of the Confidential Information to the Discloser and will not retain any copies or records of the Confidential Information; and\n4.1.2 The Recipient shall make no further use of the Confidential Information.\n5. Intellectual Property in the Confidential Information\n5.1 The Recipient acknowledges and agrees that the intellectual property and in particular, the\ncopyright in the Confidential Information disclosed by the Discloser, including any documents, files and other items containing any Confidential Information belongs to the Discloser.\n5.2 This Agreement is neither to prejudice nor limit the rights of the Discloser in respect of any intellectual property rights in the Confidential Information.\n5.3 This Agreement is not to be construed to:\n5.3.1 Grant the Recipient any licence or rights other than as expressly set out in this Agreement in respect of the Confidential Information; nor\n5.3.2 Require the Discloser to disclose any Confidential Information to the Recipient.\n6. Variations\n6.1 Any variations to this Agreement are to be made in writing and signed by both the Discloser and the Recipient.\n7. Governing Law and Disputes\n7.1 The validity, construction and performance of this Agreement are to be governed by the laws of the Republic of Singapore. Any dispute arising under or in connection with this Agreement is to be subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Singapore courts to which the Discloser and the Recipient submit.\n8. Third Parties\n8.1 This Agreement does not create any right enforceable by any person who is not a party to it under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act (Cap 53B, 202 Rev. Ed).\nAGREED BY THE PARTIES:\nFor and on behalf of Singapore Art Museum For and on behalf of the Recipient\nName: Name:\nDesignation: Designation:\nSignature and Company Stamp Signature and Company Stamp\n\n\n<Hypothesis>\nAgreement shall not grant Receiving Party any right to Confidential Information.

[Ground truth Answer]
Entailment

[Assistant's Response]
The document in question is a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) between the Singapore Art Museum (the Discloser) and the Recipient Company. To evaluate the hypothesis, "Agreement shall not grant Receiving Party any right to Confidential Information," we need to analyze the relevant clauses within the document.

1. **Confidential Information Definition**: The NDA explicitly defines "Confidential Information" as any information provided by the Discloser to the Recipient, whether in written, oral, or electronic form. This suggests that the Recipient does receive access to Confidential Information, albeit under strict conditions.

2. **Use of Confidential Information**: Clause 2.1.2 states that the Recipient may use the Confidential Information only for the "Permitted Purpose," which is clearly defined in the document. This implies that while the Recipient is granted access to Confidential Information, their rights to use it are limited to specific purposes outlined in the agreement.

3. **Intellectual Property Rights**: Clause 5.1 reinforces the idea that the intellectual property rights in the Confidential Information remain with the Discloser. The agreement does not grant any ownership rights or broader licenses to the Recipient beyond what is necessary to fulfill the purpose of the NDA.

4. **No Rights Beyond Agreement**: Clause 5.3.1 explicitly states that the agreement does not grant the Recipient any rights other than those expressly set out in the document regarding the Confidential Information. This aligns with the hypothesis that the agreement does not grant the Recipient any rights to the Confidential Information beyond what is necessary for the stated purpose.

Based on this analysis, the document supports the hypothesis that the agreement does not grant the Receiving Party any ownership rights to the Confidential Information, but it does allow for limited access and use under specific conditions. Therefore, the conclusion is:

**Supports**.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: