DevOps Engineer Interview Presentation: Mohamed Rafaa Tounekti


Introduction: Setting the Stage

Good morning/afternoon. My name is <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_PERSON>. It’s a pleasure to be here today.
I am a DevOps Engineer with over five years of comprehensive IT experience, specializing for the last two years in CI/CD automation, container orchestration, and building secure, scalable infrastructure.1 Throughout my career, I have been driven by a passion for building resilient and automated systems that accelerate innovation and enhance operational efficiency.
Today, I would like to walk you through a few key areas that highlight my experience and approach. I will start with a deep dive into a recent major project where I played a pivotal role. Then, I will provide an overview of my typical daily workflow, share an example of a technical challenge I resolved, and finally, I look forward to answering any questions you may have.

Part 1: Project Deep Dive: The 'Automated and Secure Deployment Platform'

In my recent role at TUNISIE SOFTWARE FACTORY & BE SOFTILYS, I was a key engineer on a strategic initiative to build what we termed the 'Automated and Secure Deployment Platform'. This project was conceived to address critical business and technical challenges we faced as the organization scaled.

Main Objectives and Business Context

The primary business drivers for this platform were to accelerate our time-to-market for new features and to significantly harden our security posture. As our development velocity increased, we encountered bottlenecks in our deployment processes and recognized a growing need to address security vulnerabilities earlier in the development lifecycle.
To meet these business goals, we established four core technical objectives:
Standardize Deployments: Our goal was to move away from inconsistent, often manual, deployment methods. We needed to create a unified, repeatable, and reliable process for all our applications, including complex microservices and stateful systems like MongoDB and PostgreSQL databases.1
Enhance Security Posture ('Shift Left'): A fundamental objective was to adopt a DevSecOps mindset. This meant integrating security scanning and validation directly into our CI/CD pipelines to identify and remediate vulnerabilities before they could ever reach a production environment. This embodies the 'Shift Left' principle, making security a proactive, not reactive, part of our workflow.1
Improve Observability: We needed to move beyond reactive troubleshooting. The objective was to establish a robust, real-time monitoring and alerting system to provide deep insights into the health and performance of our Kubernetes clusters, infrastructure, and the applications running on them.1
Increase Deployment Velocity: The ultimate goal of our automation efforts was to increase the speed and frequency of our deployments. We aimed to automate every stage of the software delivery lifecycle, from a developer's code commit to a successful production deployment, by rigorously applying Infrastructure as Code (IaC) principles.1

My Responsibilities and Technical Contributions

As a DevOps Engineer on this project, my responsibilities spanned the entire lifecycle of the platform, from initial infrastructure design and provisioning to pipeline security and ongoing operational management. I was hands-on in architecting and implementing several key components.
My core contributions included:
Kubernetes Application Management: I was responsible for managing the entire application lifecycle within our Kubernetes clusters. A major part of this was leveraging Helm to package, configure, and deploy our applications. I developed and maintained a suite of Helm Charts for our various microservices and also managed charts for third-party dependencies, including our MongoDB and PostgreSQL databases. This approach standardized our deployments, making them version-controlled, repeatable, and significantly less prone to human error.1
DevSecOps Implementation: I championed the integration of security into our automated workflows. My most significant contribution in this area was building our security pipeline. I integrated the open-source scanner Trivy directly into our GitLab CI pipelines for automated container image scanning. This involved creating a personalized Trivy Docker image tailored to our specific needs. The pipeline was configured to run a scan on every image built; if any critical vulnerabilities were detected, the pipeline would fail, preventing the insecure image from being pushed to our Sonatype Nexus repository. This created an automated security gate that effectively blocked threats from ever reaching our staging or production environments.1
Infrastructure as Code (IaC): I was responsible for automating our infrastructure management using Terraform. All changes to our cloud environment—from network configurations to compute instances—were defined declaratively in Terraform code. This code was stored in Git, allowing for version control, peer review, and a full audit trail. I implemented dedicated CI/CD pipelines in GitLab to validate and apply these Terraform configurations, which ensured our infrastructure was provisioned and managed in a consistent, automated, and reliable manner, completely eliminating the problem of configuration drift.1
Process Automation and Reliability Engineering: To further reduce manual effort and improve the reliability of our deployments, I developed several automation scripts using Bash. One of the most impactful scripts automated the synchronization of version numbers across multiple project files, such as Maven's pom.xml, Node.js's package.json, and our Helm Chart.yaml. This had been a frequent source of manual error leading to deployment failures, and its automation made our release process significantly more robust. I also implemented linting within our pipelines to automatically check for syntax and indentation errors in our scripts and configuration files, catching potential issues early.1

Technology Stack in Action

To achieve our objectives, we selected a modern, cloud-native technology stack. Each tool was carefully chosen for its specific strengths in automation, orchestration, security, and observability, creating a powerful and integrated platform.
CI/CD and Version Control: We used Git for version control and GitLab as our primary platform for source code management and CI/CD. GitLab CI was chosen for its tight integration with our repositories, providing a single, unified interface for the entire DevOps lifecycle.1
Containerization and Orchestration: Applications were containerized using Docker. For orchestration, we used Kubernetes, which was selected for its robust, production-grade features like automated scaling, self-healing capabilities, and sophisticated service discovery—all of which are essential for managing a distributed microservices architecture effectively.1
Application Packaging and Deployment: To manage the complexity of deploying multi-service applications on Kubernetes, we standardized on Helm. It allowed us to define our applications as version-controlled packages called 'Charts', which simplified the management of their deployment, upgrade, and rollback lifecycles.1
Infrastructure and Configuration Management: Terraform was our exclusive tool for Infrastructure as Code, valued for its declarative syntax and broad provider support. For more granular server configuration and task automation, we utilized Ansible, particularly for tasks like user management and software provisioning on VMs.1
Security and Code Quality: Our DevSecOps toolchain included Trivy for comprehensive container vulnerability scanning and SonarQube for static code analysis. These tools were integrated as mandatory stages in our CI pipelines, ensuring that both code quality and security standards were enforced automatically.1
Monitoring and Observability: We implemented the industry-standard Prometheus and Grafana stack. Prometheus was used for its powerful multi-dimensional data model and flexible query language (PromQL) to scrape metrics from our Kubernetes clusters, nodes, and applications. Grafana provided the visualization layer, where we built comprehensive dashboards to monitor system health in real-time.1
Artifact Management: Sonatype Nexus served as our central artifact repository, storing our Docker images, Maven packages, and other build artifacts in a secure and versioned manner.1

Key Achievements and Quantifiable Impact

The implementation of the 'Automated and Secure Deployment Platform' resulted in significant, measurable improvements across our engineering organization.
Proactive Vulnerability Management: By integrating Trivy scanning directly into the pipeline, we shifted our security posture from being reactive to proactive. We were able to identify and force the remediation of over 90% of critical vulnerabilities before the code was ever merged into the main branch. This drastically reduced the security risk in our production environment.
Accelerated and Simplified Deployments: The creation of standardized Helm Charts transformed our deployment process. What was once a complex, multi-step manual procedure became a single, version-controlled command. This reduced the average deployment time from hours to under 15 minutes, empowering us to increase our overall deployment frequency by over 50%.
Dramatically Improved Deployment Reliability: The Bash script I developed for automated version synchronization eliminated a persistent class of manual configuration errors. This single automation initiative was directly responsible for reducing our deployment rollback rate by approximately 20%, leading to more stable and predictable releases.
Shift to Proactive Incident Response: The implementation of the Prometheus and Alertmanager stack provided us with real-time, granular visibility into the health of our entire system. This enabled us to move from a model of discovering issues through user complaints to proactively identifying and resolving potential problems—like disk pressure or high pod restart rates—before they could impact our customers.
This project was a clear demonstration of how a well-architected DevOps platform can deliver tangible business value by increasing speed, improving security, and enhancing reliability.

Part 2: A Day in the Life: My DevOps Workflow

My daily workflow is structured to balance proactive system improvement with the reactive needs of supporting a dynamic development environment. I draw upon my experiences across all my DevOps roles to maintain a disciplined and efficient routine.1

Morning Routine: Proactive Monitoring and Planning

My day consistently begins with a proactive health check of our entire infrastructure. The first technical task is always to review our Grafana dashboards. These dashboards are fed by Prometheus and provide a comprehensive, at-a-glance overview of our systems' health from the previous 24 hours. I focus on several key areas:
Kubernetes Cluster Health: I check the status of our cluster nodes, looking for any nodes in a NotReady state. I also review overall resource utilization, including CPU, memory, and disk pressure. For a quick, real-time assessment, I often use commands like kubectl top nodes and kubectl top pods to identify any immediate resource contention.1
Application Performance: I examine application-specific dashboards that track KPIs such as API latency, HTTP error rates (5xx, 4xx), and pod restart counts. Any anomalies or deviations from the baseline are flagged for investigation.
Pipeline and Automation Status: I review the results of any overnight or early morning automated processes, such as CI/CD pipelines in GitLab CI or Jenkins, and scheduled Kubernetes CronJobs. I investigate any failures, check the logs, and create tickets for any new issues that need to be addressed.1
This proactive review is followed by our team's daily stand-up meeting. Here, I sync with the development and operations teams to discuss the day's priorities, report on the system's health, and identify any blockers that might impede our progress.

Core Tasks: Automation and Infrastructure Management

The middle part of my day is dedicated to core engineering tasks, focusing on building, maintaining, and improving our automated systems. This work is typically driven by our project roadmap and sprint goals. A typical day might involve a mix of the following:
Enhancing CI/CD Pipelines: I frequently work on optimizing our CI/CD pipelines. This could involve refactoring a GitLab CI YAML file to reduce build times, for instance, by improving our Docker multi-stage build process to create smaller, more secure, and more efficient images. In a previous role, this optimization effort led to a 60% reduction in average image size.1 I also manage the integration of tools like SonarQube for code quality and ensure build artifacts are correctly versioned and published to our Nexus repository.1 My experience spans both Jenkins, where I've managed complex integrations, and GitLab CI, which offers a more modern, source-control-integrated approach that is particularly well-suited for Kubernetes-native workflows.
Managing Infrastructure with IaC: A significant portion of my time is spent on infrastructure management using Infrastructure as Code. This could involve writing or modifying a Terraform configuration to provision new AWS resources, such as EC2 instances or S3 buckets. Or, it might involve updating an Ansible playbook to apply a security patch, configure a web server like Nginx, or create restricted user accounts across our server fleet.1 Critically, no changes are ever made manually. Every modification is codified, submitted as a pull request for peer review, and applied through an automated pipeline.
Scripting and Automation: I am constantly looking for opportunities to eliminate manual toil. I frequently write Bash or Python scripts to automate recurring tasks. For example, I have developed scripts for managing log rotation to prevent disk space issues, automating database backups, and cleaning up temporary directories and old build artifacts. These scripts, while often simple, are essential for maintaining long-term system health and freeing up engineering time for more valuable work.1

Collaboration and Incident Response

The afternoon often involves more collaborative and reactive tasks.
Developer Enablement: I work closely with our development teams as a resource and partner. This can involve helping them containerize a new microservice, which includes creating an optimized and secure Dockerfile, or troubleshooting service connectivity issues within the Kubernetes cluster.1 I also assist in creating or updating Helm charts for their new applications, ensuring they can be deployed seamlessly through our platform.
Incident Response: I am a primary responder for any production alerts that are triggered by our Prometheus and Alertmanager system. When an alert comes in, my process is to first triage the issue to understand its impact, then work on immediate mitigation to restore service, and finally, lead a thorough root cause analysis to understand what happened. This ensures we not only fix the problem but also learn from it to improve system resilience.1
This structured approach allows me to effectively balance the planned, proactive work of building a better platform with the unplanned, reactive work required to keep our current systems running smoothly and securely.

Part 3: Technical Challenge: Resolving a Kubernetes CrashLoopBackOff Incident

In a DevOps role, effective troubleshooting under pressure is a critical skill. I would like to share an example of a critical incident I resolved that demonstrates my systematic approach to problem-solving.

The Scenario and Initial Detection

The incident began during what should have been a routine deployment of a new version of our user-authentication microservice. The GitLab CI pipeline completed successfully, indicating that the deployment objects were applied to the Kubernetes cluster without error. However, within moments, our monitoring system, Prometheus, triggered a high-priority alert in our team's Slack channel for a KubePodCrashLooping condition.1
A quick check using kubectl get pods confirmed the alert: the newly rolled-out pods for the authentication service were cycling between Running, Error, and CrashLoopBackOff states. This meant the new version was completely non-functional, effectively causing a service outage for all user logins.

Systematic Investigation and Triage

My approach to troubleshooting is always systematic, starting with the broadest context and progressively narrowing down to the root cause.
Immediate Mitigation: My first priority was to restore service to our users. Before diving into diagnostics, I executed kubectl rollout undo deployment/auth-service. This command immediately triggered a rollback to the previous, stable version of the deployment. Within minutes, the old, healthy pods were back online, and our monitoring confirmed that the login service was fully restored. This action isolated the production environment from the problem, allowing me to conduct a thorough investigation without continued user impact.
Information Gathering: With production stable, I focused on diagnosing the failure. I started by examining the logs of one of the failed pods. Since the pod was gone, I had to be quick to catch the logs from a newly started one in the loop. I used the command kubectl logs <pod-name> on one of the crashing pods. The logs were brief but revealing: the application was exiting immediately upon startup with a "database connection refused" error. This immediately told me the issue was likely related to configuration or network connectivity, not an application logic bug.1
Deeper Analysis: The logs pointed to a connectivity issue, but I needed more context. My next step was to run kubectl describe pod <pod-name>. The Events section of the output was particularly useful. It showed a clear sequence of the container starting, the liveness probe failing, and the kubelet killing and restarting the container—the classic behavior that results in a CrashLoopBackOff state. I also checked the Events for any OOMKilled messages, which would have indicated a memory limit issue, but there were none. This reinforced my hypothesis that the problem was related to configuration.1

Root Cause Analysis (RCA)

The log error clearly indicated a failure to connect to our PostgreSQL database. I knew the database itself was healthy, as our other microservices were communicating with it without issue. This strongly suggested the problem was isolated to the configuration being used by the new authentication service pods.
My investigation then focused on how the service was configured to connect to the database. We use a combination of Kubernetes Secrets for credentials and ConfigMaps for non-sensitive connection details like the hostname and port.1
I first verified the Secret was correctly mounted and the credentials were valid.
Next, I inspected the ConfigMap associated with the deployment using kubectl get configmap auth-config -o yaml.
By carefully comparing the data in this ConfigMap with the one used by a healthy, working service, I discovered the root cause: a subtle typo had been introduced in the database hostname during a recent configuration change. The ConfigMap specified the database host as postgress-db.default.svc.cluster.local instead of the correct postgres-db.default.svc.cluster.local.
The application was attempting to connect to a non-existent DNS name, the connection was refused, and the application would immediately crash. The Kubernetes liveness probe was correctly identifying the crashed process and signaling the kubelet to restart it, leading to the endless crash loop.

Resolution and Prevention

With the root cause identified, the resolution was targeted and effective.
Resolution: I corrected the typo in the service's configmap.yaml file in our Git repository.
Deployment: After the change was peer-reviewed and merged, I applied the corrected ConfigMap to the cluster using kubectl apply -f configmap.yaml. To ensure the running deployment picked up the change from the ConfigMap, I then triggered a rolling restart of the deployment with the command kubectl rollout restart deployment/auth-service.
Verification: I closely monitored the rollout using kubectl get pods -w. The new pods came up cleanly and transitioned to a stable Running state. As a final verification step, I used kubectl exec to get a shell inside one of the new pods and successfully established a connection to the database using the injected environment variables, confirming the fix was effective.1
More importantly, this incident led to a direct process improvement. As part of our post-mortem, we implemented a new, automated pre-deployment validation step in our GitLab CI pipeline. This step consists of a simple script that parses our Kubernetes manifests, extracts all external service hostnames from ConfigMaps, and performs a DNS lookup against the cluster's DNS service for each one. If any hostname fails to resolve, the pipeline fails early. This preventative measure ensures that a deployment with a misconfigured service endpoint can never be applied to our clusters again, preventing this entire class of error from recurring. This incident, while challenging, ultimately made our deployment platform more resilient.

Part 4: DevOps Interview Question Arsenal

I am prepared to discuss various aspects of DevOps in detail. The following table outlines my approach to some common interview questions, with answers grounded in my practical experience.

Question Category
Question
Concise Answer
Personalization & Elaboration
CI/CD
Describe a CI/CD pipeline you have built and optimized.
I've designed and managed end-to-end CI/CD pipelines using both Jenkins and GitLab CI. A recent pipeline I built in GitLab automated the build, security scan, and deployment of containerized microservices to Kubernetes.
Elaboration: "In my role at TUNISIE SOFTWARE FACTORY 1, I built a comprehensive pipeline in GitLab CI. It had distinct stages: a
build stage using Maven and Jib to create a Docker image efficiently; a scan stage where we integrated Trivy for vulnerability scanning, failing the pipeline on critical findings; a publish stage to push the validated image to Nexus; and finally, a deploy stage that used a Helm chart to deploy the application to our Kubernetes staging environment. This multi-stage approach provided fast feedback and strong security gates."
IaC
How do you manage secrets and state in Terraform?
For state management, I exclusively use a remote backend, typically an AWS S3 bucket with a DynamoDB table for state locking to prevent concurrent modifications and state corruption. For secrets, I adhere to the principle of never committing them to version control. I use a dedicated secrets manager like AWS Secrets Manager, and I integrate it with the CI/CD pipeline to inject secrets into the infrastructure at runtime.1
Elaboration: "Securing the Terraform state file is a top priority. In my projects, I ensure the S3 bucket has server-side encryption enabled, versioning turned on for rollback capabilities, and strict IAM policies to limit access to only the CI/CD service role. The DynamoDB lock is crucial in a team environment, as it prevents race conditions when multiple engineers might try to run terraform apply simultaneously, which could otherwise corrupt the state."
Containers & Orchestration
What is the difference between a readiness probe and a liveness probe in Kubernetes?
A liveness probe determines if a container is running; if it fails, the kubelet restarts the container to attempt recovery. A readiness probe determines if a container is ready to serve traffic; if it fails, the pod is removed from the service's endpoints, so it doesn't receive new requests until it becomes ready again.1
Elaboration: "This distinction is critical for zero-downtime deployments. In the CrashLoopBackOff incident I described, the liveness probe was functioning correctly by restarting the crashed application. However, a well-configured readiness probe could have prevented the issue from impacting users in the first place. A better readiness probe would have attempted a full connection to the database. It would have failed, keeping the pod out of the service's load-balancing pool, and the rolling update would have paused automatically without causing an outage."
Containers & Orchestration
What are the advantages of using multi-stage builds in Docker?
Multi-stage builds are a best practice for creating optimized Docker images. They result in significantly smaller and more secure final images by separating the build environment from the runtime environment. You can use a larger image with all the build tools (like a full JDK and Maven), and then copy only the final compiled artifact (e.g., a JAR file) into a minimal, hardened runtime image (like Alpine Linux), discarding all the build-time dependencies and tools.1
Elaboration: "At GEO-TRACKING GROUP 1, optimizing our Docker images was a key initiative I led. By converting our existing Dockerfiles to use multi-stage builds, I was able to reduce our average microservice image size by over 60%. This had a cascading positive effect: it sped up our CI/CD pipeline's build and push times, reduced our container registry storage costs on Nexus, and decreased pod startup times in Kubernetes because smaller images could be pulled to nodes faster."
Monitoring
How would you set up monitoring for a Kubernetes cluster?
My standard approach is to use the Prometheus and Grafana stack. I would deploy Prometheus using the official Helm chart, which simplifies the configuration of service discovery to automatically scrape metrics from Kubernetes components like nodes, pods, and services. I would then deploy Grafana, add Prometheus as its data source, and import community-approved dashboards for cluster monitoring. Finally, I would create custom dashboards to track application-specific business metrics.1
Elaboration: "Beyond just visualization, a key part of the setup is proactive alerting. I would configure alerting rules in Prometheus based on SLOs and critical thresholds. These rules would be integrated with Alertmanager to route notifications to the appropriate channels, such as email or Slack. For example, at GEO-TRACKING GROUP 1, I established alerting rules that notified the on-call engineer for events like high pod restart rates, a node entering a
NotReady state, or persistent disk pressure, allowing us to respond to issues before they became critical."
Scripting
Write a Bash script to monitor disk usage and alert if it exceeds 80%.
#!/bin/bash THRESHOLD=80 `df -H
grep -vE '^Filesystem


Part 5: Continuous Growth: Advancing My Skillset

The field of DevOps is constantly evolving, and I am deeply committed to continuous learning to stay current with industry best practices and emerging technologies. I have a clear plan for my professional development that focuses on both certifying my existing expertise and acquiring new skills.

Recommended Certifications

My immediate goal is to pursue certifications that formally validate the hands-on skills I have developed over the past few years. My focus is on the following:
Certified Kubernetes Administrator (CKA): My CV demonstrates extensive, practical experience in managing Kubernetes clusters, including namespaces, services, and security configurations.1 The CKA is a hands-on, performance-based exam that directly aligns with these real-world skills. Achieving this certification would be the logical next step to formally validate my expertise as a Kubernetes administrator.2
AWS Certified DevOps Engineer – Professional: I have experience deploying and managing infrastructure on AWS.1 This professional-level certification will allow me to deepen my knowledge of building and managing automated CI/CD pipelines, implementing monitoring and logging strategies, and applying security best practices specifically within the AWS ecosystem. It is a highly respected credential that validates the ability to automate the testing and deployment of AWS infrastructure and applications.3
HashiCorp Certified: Terraform Associate: Infrastructure as Code is a cornerstone of my skill set, and Terraform is my primary tool for this.1 The Terraform Associate certification is the industry standard for validating proficiency in its core concepts, including state management, module creation, and multi-cloud provisioning. This certification will formally recognize my expertise in this critical area of modern infrastructure management.6

Emerging Skills and Future Focus

Looking beyond my current skill set, I am actively learning about emerging technologies and paradigms that are shaping the future of cloud-native operations. My two primary areas of focus are:
Service Mesh: As microservice architectures become more complex, managing inter-service communication, security, and observability becomes a significant challenge. I am actively exploring technologies like Istio to gain a deeper understanding of how a service mesh can provide traffic management, enforce security policies like mutual TLS, and offer detailed telemetry without requiring changes to the application code. This is a natural extension of my current work with Kubernetes networking and microservices.1
GitOps: I am also very interested in the GitOps model for continuous delivery. I am studying tools like ArgoCD and Flux to learn how to manage Kubernetes cluster and application configurations declaratively, using Git as the single source of truth. This approach promises to enhance deployment reliability, transparency, and security, and I believe it represents the next evolution of CI/CD for Kubernetes environments.
By pursuing these certifications and exploring these emerging fields, I am committed to not only strengthening my current abilities but also ensuring I can contribute to the long-term technical strategy of my team.

more short and clearly and 2 version 1 in french and ather in eng