System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
[Instruction]
In this task, you are provided conversational context and backup passage. Your job is deciding the response type according to whether the provided passage contains enough information to answer. Therefore, classify the respone type to 'directAnswer' if the passage contain adequate information, 'clarification' if the question is required to be clarified, and 'noAnswerButRelevantInfo' if the passage does not provide direct answer but include somewhat relevant information.Question: Why did R. Kelly become a sex offender?\nPassage: : R. Kelly\n--Early life.\n--Career.\n----1990–1996: "Born into the 90's", "12 Play" and "R. Kelly".\n----1997–2001: Basketball, "R.", "TP-2.COM," and Rockland Records.\n------Rockland Records.\n----2002–2003: "The Best of Both Worlds" and "Chocolate Factory".\n----2004–2005: "Unfinished Business, Happy People/U Saved Me" and "TP.3 Reloaded".\n----2006–2009: "Double Up" and "Untitled", Africa.\n----2010–2012: "Epic", "Love Letter", throat surgery, and "Write Me Back".\n----2013–2016: "Black Panties", "The Buffet", and "12 Nights of Christmas".\n--Artistry.\n----Musical style and influences.\n----Vocal style and lyrical themes.\n--Sexual abuse allegations.\n----Early reports of sexual abuse (1990s).\n----Illegal marriage (1994).\n----Sex tape circulates (2002).\n----First criminal indictment (2002).\n----Allegations of preteen girl molestation (2009).\n----Huffington Post Live Interview (2015).\n----Alleged sex cult (2010s).\n----Boycott and industry response.\n------Allegations of music industry complicity.\n----Musical response to allegations.\n----"Surviving R. Kelly" (2019–2020).\n----Second series of criminal charges (2019–2021).\n----Criminal conviction (2021).\n----Other legal issues.\n--Influence.\n--Personal life.\n----Charity and donations.\n--Honors and awards.\n\n

[Ground truth Answer]
directAnswer

[Assistant's Response]
The passage provides a list of headings related to R. Kelly, including a section on "Sexual abuse allegations," which indicates various allegations and legal issues over the years. However, it does not offer specific details about the nature of the offenses or the outcomes of legal proceedings that would directly explain why R. Kelly became a sex offender. Therefore, the appropriate response type is 'noAnswerButRelevantInfo' as the passage includes somewhat relevant information but lacks a direct answer to the question.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: