You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


#!/bin/bash
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

# IPv4 and IPv6 onlink tests

PAUSE_ON_FAIL=${PAUSE_ON_FAIL:=no}

# Network interfaces
# - odd in current namespace; even in peer ns
declare -A NETIFS
# default VRF
NETIFS[p1]=veth1
NETIFS[p2]=veth2
NETIFS[p3]=veth3
NETIFS[p4]=veth4
# VRF
NETIFS[p5]=veth5
NETIFS[p6]=veth6
NETIFS[p7]=veth7
NETIFS[p8]=veth8

# /24 network
declare -A V4ADDRS
V4ADDRS[p1]=169.254.1.1
V4ADDRS[p2]=169.254.1.2
V4ADDRS[p3]=169.254.3.1
V4ADDRS[p4]=169.254.3.2
V4ADDRS[p5]=169.254.5.1
V4ADDRS[p6]=169.254.5.2
V4ADDRS[p7]=169.254.7.1
V4ADDRS[p8]=169.254.7.2

# /64 network
declare -A V6ADDRS
V6ADDRS[p1]=2001:db8:101::1
V6ADDRS[p2]=2001:db8:101::2
V6ADDRS[p3]=2001:db8:301::1
V6ADDRS[p4]=2001:db8:301::2
V6ADDRS[p5]=2001:db8:501::1
V6ADDRS[p6]=2001:db8:501::2
V6ADDRS[p7]=2001:db8:701::1
V6ADDRS[p8]=2001:db8:701::2

# Test networks:
# [1] = default table
# [2] = VRF
#
# /32 host routes
declare -A TEST_NET4
TEST_NET4[1]=169.254.101
TEST_NET4[2]=169.254.102
# /128 host routes
declare -A TEST_NET6
TEST_NET6[1]=2001:db8:101
TEST_NET6[2]=2001:db8:102

# connected gateway
CONGW[1]=169.254.1.254
CONGW[2]=169.254.5.254

# recursive gateway
RECGW4[1]=169.254.11.254
RECGW4[2]=169.254.12.254
RECGW6[1]=2001:db8:11::64
RECGW6[2]=2001:db8:12::64

# for v4 mapped to v6
declare -A TEST_NET4IN6IN6
TEST_NET4IN6[1]=10.1.1.254
TEST_NET4IN6[2]=10.2.1.254

# mcast address
MCAST6=ff02::1


PEER_NS=bart
PEER_CMD="ip netns exec ${PEER_NS}"
VRF=lisa
VRF_TABLE=1101
PBR_TABLE=101

################################################################################
# utilities

log_test()
{
	local rc=$1
	local expected=$2
	local msg="$3"

	if [ ${rc} -eq ${expected} ]; then
		nsuccess=$((nsuccess+1))
		printf "\n    TEST: %-50s  [ OK ]\n" "${msg}"
	else
		nfail=$((nfail+1))
		printf "\n    TEST: %-50s  [FAIL]\n" "${msg}"
		if [ "${PAUSE_ON_FAIL}" = "yes" ]; then
			echo
			echo "hit enter to continue, 'q' to quit"
			read a
			[ "$a" = "q" ] && exit 1
		fi
	fi
}

log_section()
{
	echo
	echo "######################################################################"
	echo "TEST SECTION: $*"
	echo "######################################################################"
}

log_subsection()
{
	echo
	echo "#########################################"
	echo "TEST SUBSECTION: $*"
}

run_cmd()
{
	echo
	echo "COMMAND: $*"
	eval $*
}

get_linklocal()
{
	local dev=$1
	local pfx
	local addr

	addr=$(${pfx} ip -6 -br addr show dev ${dev} | \
	awk '{
		for (i = 3; i <= NF; ++i) {
			if ($i ~ /^fe80/)
				print $i
		}
	}'
	)
	addr=${addr/\/*}

	[ -z "$addr" ] && return 1

	echo $addr

	return 0
}

################################################################################
#

setup()
{
	echo
	echo "########################################"
	echo "Configuring interfaces"

	set -e

	# create namespace
	ip netns add ${PEER_NS}
	ip -netns ${PEER_NS} li set lo up

	# add vrf table
	ip li add ${VRF} type vrf table ${VRF_TABLE}
	ip li set ${VRF} up
	ip ro add table ${VRF_TABLE} unreachable default
	ip -6 ro add table ${VRF_TABLE} unreachable default

	# create test interfaces
	ip li add ${NETIFS[p1]} type veth peer name ${NETIFS[p2]}
	ip li add ${NETIFS[p3]} type veth peer name ${NETIFS[p4]}
	ip li add ${NETIFS[p5]} type veth peer name ${NETIFS[p6]}
	ip li add ${NETIFS[p7]} type veth peer name ${NETIFS[p8]}

	# enslave vrf interfaces
	for n in 5 7; do
		ip li set ${NETIFS[p${n}]} vrf ${VRF}
	done

	# add addresses
	for n in 1 3 5 7; do
		ip li set ${NETIFS[p${n}]} up
		ip addr add ${V4ADDRS[p${n}]}/24 dev ${NETIFS[p${n}]}
		ip addr add ${V6ADDRS[p${n}]}/64 dev ${NETIFS[p${n}]}
	done

	# move peer interfaces to namespace and add addresses
	for n in 2 4 6 8; do
		ip li set ${NETIFS[p${n}]} netns ${PEER_NS} up
		ip -netns ${PEER_NS} addr add ${V4ADDRS[p${n}]}/24 dev ${NETIFS[p${n}]}
		ip -netns ${PEER_NS} addr add ${V6ADDRS[p${n}]}/64 dev ${NETIFS[p${n}]}
	done

	set +e

	# let DAD complete - assume default of 1 probe
	sleep 1
}

cleanup()
{
	# make sure we start from a clean slate
	ip netns del ${PEER_NS} 2>/dev/null
	for n in 1 3 5 7; do
		ip link del ${NETIFS[p${n}]} 2>/dev/null
	done
	ip link del ${VRF} 2>/dev/null
	ip ro flush table ${VRF_TABLE}
	ip -6 ro flush table ${VRF_TABLE}
}

################################################################################
# IPv4 tests
#

run_ip()
{
	local table="$1"
	local prefix="$2"
	local gw="$3"
	local dev="$4"
	local exp_rc="$5"
	local desc="$6"

	# dev arg may be empty
	[ -n "${dev}" ] && dev="dev ${dev}"

	run_cmd ip ro add table "${table}" "${prefix}"/32 via "${gw}" "${dev}" onlink
	log_test $? ${exp_rc} "${desc}"
}

valid_onlink_ipv4()
{
	# - unicast connected, unicast recursive
	#
	log_subsection "default VRF - main table"

	run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.1 ${CONGW[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast connected"
	run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.2 ${RECGW4[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast recursive"

	log_subsection "VRF ${VRF}"

	run_ip ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.1 ${CONGW[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast connected"
	run_ip ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.2 ${RECGW4[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast recursive"

	log_subsection "VRF device, PBR table"

	run_ip ${PBR_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.3 ${CONGW[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast connected"
	run_ip ${PBR_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.4 ${RECGW4[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast recursive"
}

invalid_onlink_ipv4()
{
	run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.11 ${V4ADDRS[p1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - local unicast address"

	run_ip ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.11 ${V4ADDRS[p5]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - local unicast address, VRF"

	run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.101 ${V4ADDRS[p1]} "" 2 "No nexthop device given"

	run_ip 254 ${TEST_NET4[1]}.102 ${V4ADDRS[p3]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 2 \
		"Gateway resolves to wrong nexthop device"

	run_ip ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET4[2]}.103 ${V4ADDRS[p7]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 2 \
		"Gateway resolves to wrong nexthop device - VRF"
}

################################################################################
# IPv6 tests
#

run_ip6()
{
	local table="$1"
	local prefix="$2"
	local gw="$3"
	local dev="$4"
	local exp_rc="$5"
	local desc="$6"

	# dev arg may be empty
	[ -n "${dev}" ] && dev="dev ${dev}"

	run_cmd ip -6 ro add table "${table}" "${prefix}"/128 via "${gw}" "${dev}" onlink
	log_test $? ${exp_rc} "${desc}"
}

valid_onlink_ipv6()
{
	# - unicast connected, unicast recursive, v4-mapped
	#
	log_subsection "default VRF - main table"

	run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::1 ${V6ADDRS[p1]/::*}::64 ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast connected"
	run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::2 ${RECGW6[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "unicast recursive"
	run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::3 ::ffff:${TEST_NET4IN6[1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 0 "v4-mapped"

	log_subsection "VRF ${VRF}"

	run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::1 ${V6ADDRS[p5]/::*}::64 ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast connected"
	run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::2 ${RECGW6[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast recursive"
	run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::3 ::ffff:${TEST_NET4IN6[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "v4-mapped"

	log_subsection "VRF device, PBR table"

	run_ip6 ${PBR_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::4 ${V6ADDRS[p5]/::*}::64 ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast connected"
	run_ip6 ${PBR_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::5 ${RECGW6[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "unicast recursive"
	run_ip6 ${PBR_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::6 ::ffff:${TEST_NET4IN6[2]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 0 "v4-mapped"
}

invalid_onlink_ipv6()
{
	local lladdr

	lladdr=$(get_linklocal ${NETIFS[p1]}) || return 1

	run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::11 ${V6ADDRS[p1]} ${NETIFS[p1]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - local unicast address"
	run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::12 ${lladdr} ${NETIFS[p1]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - local linklocal address"
	run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::12 ${MCAST6} ${NETIFS[p1]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - multicast address"

	lladdr=$(get_linklocal ${NETIFS[p5]}) || return 1
	run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::11 ${V6ADDRS[p5]} ${NETIFS[p5]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - local unicast address, VRF"
	run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::12 ${lladdr} ${NETIFS[p5]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - local linklocal address, VRF"
	run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::12 ${MCAST6} ${NETIFS[p5]} 2 \
		"Invalid gw - multicast address, VRF"

	run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::101 ${V6ADDRS[p1]} "" 2 \
		"No nexthop device given"

	# default VRF validation is done against LOCAL table
	# run_ip6 254 ${TEST_NET6[1]}::102 ${V6ADDRS[p3]/::[0-9]/::64} ${NETIFS[p1]} 2 \
	#	"Gateway resolves to wrong nexthop device"

	run_ip6 ${VRF_TABLE} ${TEST_NET6[2]}::103 ${V6ADDRS[p7]/::[0-9]/::64} ${NETIFS[p5]} 2 \
		"Gateway resolves to wrong nexthop device - VRF"
}

run_onlink_tests()
{
	log_section "IPv4 onlink"
	log_subsection "Valid onlink commands"
	valid_onlink_ipv4
	log_subsection "Invalid onlink commands"
	invalid_onlink_ipv4

	log_section "IPv6 onlink"
	log_subsection "Valid onlink commands"
	valid_onlink_ipv6
	invalid_onlink_ipv6
}

################################################################################
# main

nsuccess=0
nfail=0

cleanup
setup
run_onlink_tests
cleanup

if [ "$TESTS" != "none" ]; then
	printf "\nTests passed: %3d\n" ${nsuccess}
	printf "Tests failed: %3d\n"   ${nfail}
fi