System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Make a questionnaire to help hotel guests write hotel reviews.

[Ground truth Answer]
1- Your overall rating of this property:
2- Title of your review:
3- Summarize your visit or highlight an interesting detail:
4- Your Review:
5- What sort of trip was this? Business/Couples/Family/Friends/Solo
6- When did you travel?
7- Could you say a little more about it? (optional)
We'd love your opinion! Anything you can share will help other travelers choose their perfect hotel. Thanks.
Hotel Style & Amenities: 
Does this hotel have laundry service? Yes/No/Not Sure
Does this hotel have a game room? Yes/No/Not Sure
Does this hotel have a sun terrace? Yes/No/Not Sure
Is the front desk of the hotel staffed 24-hours a day? Yes/No/Not Sure
8-  How expensive is this hotel? Budget/Mid-range/Luxury
9- Add a tip to help travelers choose a good room PE.g., best views, quieter floors, accessibility, etc.)
10- Do you have photos to share? (optional)

[Assistant's Response]
Creating a structured questionnaire can greatly assist hotel guests in writing detailed and insightful reviews. Here’s a comprehensive questionnaire designed to guide guests through the review process:

---

**Hotel Review Questionnaire**

1. **Overall Experience**
   - How would you rate your overall experience at the hotel? (1-5 stars)
   - What was the highlight of your stay?

2. **Check-In Process**
   - How smooth was your check-in experience? (Smooth, Average, Delayed)
   - Were the staff friendly and helpful during check-in?

3. **Room Quality**
   - How would you describe the cleanliness of your room? (Excellent, Good, Fair, Poor)
   - Did the room meet your expectations in terms of comfort and amenities?

4. **Facilities and Services**
   - Did you use any hotel facilities (e.g., pool, gym, restaurant)? If so, how would you rate them?
   - Were there any services (e.g., room service, concierge) that stood out to you?

5. **Staff Interaction**
   - How would you rate the friendliness and professionalism of the hotel staff?
   - Did you have any memorable interactions with the staff?

6. **Location**
   - How convenient was the hotel’s location for your needs? (e.g., proximity to attractions, transportation)
   - Would you recommend this hotel’s location to others?

7. **Value for Money**
   - Do you feel you received good value for the price you paid?
   - Would you consider staying here again based on the value?

8. **Suggestions for Improvement**
   - Is there anything you think the hotel could improve upon?
   - Any additional comments or suggestions?

9. **Recommendation**
   - Would you recommend this hotel to friends or family? Why or why not?

---

Feel free to customize these questions to better suit specific aspects of your hotel or to gather more targeted feedback. This questionnaire can help guests articulate their experiences and provide valuable insights for future guests and hotel management.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: