You will receive a question-answer pair. Your task is to:

1. Decompose the answer into a sequence of numbered steps ("Step 1", "Step 2", etc.).
2. For each step, include a reasoning description and assign a confidence score (a float between 0 and 1).
3. For **accepted answers**, ensure reasoning steps are correct, with confidence scores that progressively increase as the steps approach the final answer.
4. For **rejected answers**, introduce flaws or errors in reasoning steps, and use inconsistent or lower confidence scores.

Please output the response in the JSON format below, following the example provided.


---

*Expected JSON Output Format:*

{
  "question": "[Insert question text here]",
  "accepted_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "[Describe the first reasoning step here]",
      "confidence_score": [Float between 0 and 1, e.g., 0.7]
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "[Describe the next reasoning step]",
      "confidence_score": [Incrementally higher float, e.g., 0.8]
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "[Continue describing each step with incrementally higher scores]",
      "confidence_score": [Approaching 1, e.g., 0.9]
    }
    // Continue until the final reasoning step
  },
  "rejected_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "[Introduce an incorrect or misleading reasoning step here]",
      "confidence_score": [Lower or inconsistent float, e.g., 0.5]
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "[Add a flawed or irrelevant reasoning step]",
      "confidence_score": [Inconsistent or lower float, e.g., 0.4]
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "[Continue with errors or inconsistencies in reasoning]",
      "confidence_score": [Non-incremental or lower float, e.g., 0.6]
    }
    // Continue until the final flawed reasoning step
  }
}

---

*Example JSON Output:*

{
  "question": "What are the primary causes of climate change?",
  "accepted_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "Identify human activities as significant contributors to climate change.",
      "confidence_score": 0.7
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "Specify fossil fuel burning as a major source of greenhouse gases.",
      "confidence_score": 0.8
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "Explain how deforestation reduces CO2 absorption, increasing atmospheric CO2.",
      "confidence_score": 0.9
    }
  },
  "rejected_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "Suggest natural factors as primary contributors to climate change.",
      "confidence_score": 0.5
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "Mention volcanic activity as a significant greenhouse gas source, incorrect for recent climate trends.",
      "confidence_score": 0.4
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "Briefly describe human activities without identifying specific sources.",
      "confidence_score": 0.6
    }
  }
}

Question: A bookstore is offering a discount on bulk purchases of paperbacks. If you buy 50 paperbacks or more, the cost per book is reduced by 15%. How many paperbacks can you buy with a budget of $\$300$if the original price per book is $\$4.95$?
Answer: First, calculate the discount per book:
\[ 15\% \text{ of } \$4.95 = 0.15 \times \$4.95 = \$0.7425 \]

The discounted price per book is:
\[ \$4.95 - \$0.7425 = \$4.2075 \]

Now, calculate how many paperbacks you can buy with a budget of $\$300$at the discounted price:
\[ \text{Number of paperbacks} = \frac{\$300}{\$4.2075} \approx 71.4 \]

Since you can't buy a fraction of a book, round down to the nearest whole number. You can buy 71 paperbacks.

However, remember that the discount only applies if you buy 50 paperbacks or more. Since 71 is indeed more than 50, the calculation is valid.

The answer is $\boxed{71}$.