System: You are provided with a paragraph. Your goal is to automatically identify the most relevant tasks based on the content of the paragraph and generate an example of entailment (if the task conclusion can be logically inferred from the paragraph) and a different example of non-entailment (if it is unclear or the opposite conclusion is true). 

Step 1: Read the paragraph carefully. 
Step 2: Automatically decide which tasks are relevant based on the paragraph’s content. Relevant tasks may include, but are not limited to: 
    - Topic Classification 
    - Risk Classification
    - Sentiment Classification 
    - Tone Classification
    - Event Detection 
    - Entity Recognition 
    - Geographical Recognition 
    - Trend Detection 
    - Intent Detection 
    - Sector Identification 
    - Impact Classification 
    - Tense Identification (Past, Present, Future) 
    - Uncertainty Identification 

Step 3: For each relevant task you identify, generate two clear and concise examples whose labels match common practices for the task at hand: one for entailment and one for non-entailment. The example should speak about the text at the 3rd person. 
Step 4: Output the results in the following JSON format:

{
    'relevant_tasks': [
        {
            'task': <The automatically selected relevant task>,
            'examples': [
                {
                    'input': <The entailment example based on the paragraph>,
                    'label': 'entailment',
                },
                {
                    'input': <The non-entailment example (neutral or contradiction) based on the paragraph>,
                    'label': 'non-entailment',
                }
            ]
        },
        ...
    ]
}
User: In June 2021, a securities class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain of our agents in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (“Court”) (Case No. 2:21-cv-02725) that purported to state a claim for alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, based on statements made by us concerning the announcement of our decision to pursue the submission of a BLA for COVAXIN for adults ages 18 years and older rather than pursuing an EUA for the vaccine candidate. In July 2021, a second securities class action lawsuit was filed against us and certain of our agents in the Court (Case No. 2:21-cv-03182) that also purported to state a claim for alleged violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, based on the same statements as the first complaint. In March 2022, the Court consolidated these two related securities class action lawsuits and appointed Andre Galan Bernd Benayon to serve as lead plaintiff. The lead plaintiff's amended complaint was filed in June 2022. In March 2023, the Court granted the Company's motion to dismiss with prejudice. The lead plaintiff appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ("Third Circuit") regarding the order that was entered in March 2023, which dismissed the action with prejudice. The lead plaintiff's appellant’s brief and joint appendix were filed in July 2023. Our appellees’ brief was filed in August 2023, and the lead plaintiff's reply brief was filed in September 2023. In March 2024, the Third Circuit affirmed the Court's decision to dismiss with prejudice the consolidated securities class action lawsuits.
Assistant: