Given multiple reviews about 1946 ['movie'] ['The Stranger'], each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['Nazis - Don\'t Make Good Dogsitters I enjoyed the idea of this grand story playing out in a small New England town with unsuspecting people. When Loretta Young finds out her husband is a Nazi, she can barely even form the word. Nat-Zee!? Even though she is naive, and meant to be "normal", it bothered me how one dimensional she was. Small potatoes aside, I thought the film was well done. The dialogue was laconic, and served the seriousness of the topic. The footage of the holocaust reminded both the viewer and Mary of how truly evil Professor Rankin is. Preferred this movie to Citizen Kane. ', "Interesting for Its Time Warning: Spoilers Stranger, The (1946) *** (out of 4) Interesting but flawed thriller about a war crimes commissioner (Edward G. Robinson) who travels to a small town to find a Nazi who is hiding among the citizens. He eventually comes to suspect a Professor Rankin (Orson Welles) who recently married a woman (Loretta Young) who has no idea about his past. Coming after CITIZEN KANE and THE MAGNIFICENT AMBERSONS, it's easy to see why this film has pretty much been forgotten over the years. It certainly can't stand next to the two previous movies but when viewed on its own the thing is pretty impressive. I think there are a few major issues with the screenplay that keeps this from being a masterpiece but it is a very interesting piece for its time. Considering the war had just ended, a lot of movies were playing it safe as they looked forward to a peaceful world without any need for fear. That's certainly not the goal of this movie, which really appears to have Welles wanting to warn everyone not to turn their back because evil can be anywhere and it might just happen to be the man you go to church with or the man teaching your kids. There's a certain level of paranoia running throughout this film and that's what makes the film so interesting to watch today. It should go without saying but we get some excellent performances with Robinson leading the way as the kind Mr. Wilson. Robinson made a career out of playing tough characters and this here is certainly one but of a different sort. This is more of a thinking man's role and Robinson does a nice job with it. Young is also good in the role of the wife but I think the screenplay does her no favors as a lot of the film's issues can be seen in her weak character. Then we have Welles who is cold as ice and turns in a great performance. He's certainly easy to see in the role and is so cold and intelligent that you can easily believe he did all the things he's accused of. Philip Merivale, Richard Long and Konstantin Shayne all add nice support. There are some major flaws here including a few little plot holes that seem to get overlooked by the Robinson character but what really kept the film from being better is Young's character. At the start of the film we're made to believe that she's a very intelligent woman but as the movie goes along she just gets dumber and dumber. I know the film tries to make you think she's in love but to me her character just does one stupid thing after another and in many ways comes off way too over=emotional. I think Welles could have done a re-write on her character and everything would have played out better. With that said, this is still a very interesting movie for its era and one that contains plenty of suspense. "] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.