One of the elements from Pauli's paper that stands out concerning structural or systemic racism is the role of emergency management in Flint's water crisis. The decision to switch Flint's water source to the Flint River was made under the governance of emergency managers (EMs), appointed by the state governor. This decision-making process highlights several aspects of systemic racism.
Marginalization of a Predominantly African American Community: Flint, with a majority African American population, was placed under the control of state-appointed EMs. This effectively stripped the local, democratically elected officials, who were more representative of the community's racial and socioeconomic makeup, of their power. The EMs had mandates focused primarily on financial solvency rather than public welfare, reflecting a systemic undervaluing of the needs and voices of the predominantly African American community.
Prioritizing Cost-Savings Over Public Health: The EMs' decision to switch the water source was primarily financially motivated – an attempt to save money in the short term without adequate consideration of the long-term health implications for the community. This approach can be seen as a manifestation of systemic racism, where decisions that significantly impact minority communities are made with cost-cutting as a priority over health and safety.
Delayed and Inadequate Response to the Crisis: The initial response to the water contamination crisis by state officials was marked by denial and downplaying of the issue. This slow and inadequate response can be linked to systemic racism, as it reflects a pattern where concerns from minority communities are not taken as seriously or addressed as promptly as they would be in more affluent or predominantly white communities.
Long-standing Neglect and Underinvestment: The crisis was exacerbated by historical underinvestment in Flint’s infrastructure, a common issue in many minority-dominated areas across the U.S. This neglect is a marker of systemic racism, where minority communities often receive fewer resources and less attention to infrastructure and public health needs.
In summary, the role of emergency management in Flint's water crisis serves as a clear example of how systemic racism can influence policy decisions and responses to public health emergencies, particularly in communities with a significant minority population. The prioritization of financial considerations over the health and welfare of a predominantly African American community, combined with a history of neglect and the marginalization of local governance, highlights the deep-rooted systemic issues at play.

Concise version:
In the Flint water crisis, systemic racism was evident in the political decisions, particularly the appointment of emergency managers (EMs) in a predominantly African American community. These EMs prioritized financial concerns over public health, reflecting systemic devaluation of minority communities. Their decisions, including the switch to the Flint River for water supply, were driven by cost-cutting motives, disregarding the health implications for residents. The slow response to residents' complaints about water quality further highlights how issues in minority communities are often not addressed with the urgency seen in more affluent or predominantly white areas. Additionally, historical underinvestment in Flint's infrastructure, common in many minority-dominated areas, exacerbated the crisis. This scenario underscores how systemic racism can influence policy-making and public health in communities like Flint.
rephrase the text