System: You are provided with a paragraph. Your goal is to automatically identify the most relevant tasks based on the content of the paragraph and generate an example of entailment (if the task conclusion can be logically inferred from the paragraph) and a different example of non-entailment (if it is unclear or the opposite conclusion is true). 

Step 1: Read the paragraph carefully. 
Step 2: Automatically decide which tasks are relevant based on the paragraph’s content. Relevant tasks may include, but are not limited to: 
    - Topic Classification 
    - Risk Classification
    - Sentiment Classification 
    - Tone Classification
    - Event Detection 
    - Entity Recognition 
    - Geographical Recognition 
    - Trend Detection 
    - Intent Detection 
    - Sector Identification 
    - Impact Classification 
    - Tense Identification (Past, Present, Future) 
    - Uncertainty Identification 

Step 3: For each relevant task you identify, generate two clear and concise examples whose labels match common practices for the task at hand: one for entailment and one for non-entailment. The example should speak about the text at the 3rd person. 
Step 4: Output the results in the following JSON format:

{
    'relevant_tasks': [
        {
            'task': <The automatically selected relevant task>,
            'examples': [
                {
                    'input': <The entailment example based on the paragraph>,
                    'label': 'entailment',
                },
                {
                    'input': <The non-entailment example (neutral or contradiction) based on the paragraph>,
                    'label': 'non-entailment',
                }
            ]
        },
        ...
    ]
}
User: Negative public perception regarding us or our industry resulting from, among other things, concerns raised by advocacy groups about hydraulic fracturing, waste disposal, oil spills, seismic activity, climate change, explosions of natural gas transmission lines and the development and operation of pipelines and other midstream facilities may lead to generally increased political pressure and regulatory scrutiny, which may, in turn, lead to new state and federal safety and environmental laws, regulations, guidelines and enforcement interpretations. Additionally, environmental groups, landowners, local groups and other advocates may oppose our operations through organized protests, attempts to block or sabotage our operations or those of our midstream transportation providers, encourage capital providers to divest of their interests in us or our industry, intervene in regulatory or administrative proceedings involving our assets or those of our midstream transportation providers, or file lawsuits or other actions designed to prevent, disrupt or delay the development or operation of our assets and business or those of our midstream transportation providers. These actions may cause operational delays or restrictions, increased operating costs, additional regulatory burdens and increased risk of litigation, as well as potentially reducing our ability to execute routine or strategic business partnerships. Moreover, governmental authorities exercise considerable discretion in the timing and scope of permit issuance and the public may engage in the permitting process, including through intervention in the courts. Negative public perception could cause the permits we require to conduct our operations to be withheld, delayed or burdened by requirements that restrict our ability to profitably conduct our business. A change in control of national, state or local governments, including the U.S. presidential administration, Congress, state or local governments, and governments of other countries may also result in uncertainty regarding the degree to which there will be increased restrictions on natural gas and oil production activities, which could materially adversely affect our industry and our financial condition and results of operations.
Assistant: