System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
You need to write an email to negotiate your salary.

[Ground truth Answer]
Dear [hiring manager's name],

I wanted to take a moment to thank you for the offer. I'm honored that you would consider me for this position, and I'm excited to be working with you.
I know that it's not easy to get a sense of how much salary should be offered in a given situation, so I wanted to explain why I believe my skill set is worth more than the offered salary. 
My experience as a [position title] will prepare me well for this role, which requires extensive project management skills, as well as strong written communication skills and a deep understanding of the company's product offerings. These are all areas where I've already built up substantial experience over the past few years and am confident that they would serve me well in your company. 

I hope we can reach an agreement soon!

[Assistant's Response]
Subject: Request for Salary Discussion

Dear [Manager's Name],

I hope this message finds you well. I want to take a moment to express my appreciation for the opportunities I've had at [Company Name] and the support I've received from you and the team. I am truly excited about the work we are doing and the direction the company is heading.

I would like to discuss my current compensation package. Over the past [duration], I have taken on additional responsibilities and have contributed to [mention any significant achievements, projects, or contributions]. These experiences have not only enhanced my skills but have also allowed me to add significant value to our team and the company.

Considering my contributions and the current industry standards for my role, I believe it would be appropriate to revisit my salary. I am confident that a review of my performance and responsibilities will support a salary adjustment that reflects my contributions and aligns with market rates.

I am eager to continue my professional journey with [Company Name] and would appreciate the opportunity to discuss this matter further. Please let me know a convenient time for us to meet.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. I look forward to our conversation.

Warm regards,

[Your Name]  
[Your Position]  
[Your Contact Information]

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: