System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
Choosing a name for your product or business YouTube channel is an important part of the process. Based on the description of the product or business, you should come up with some interesting names. Take some time to brainstorm your ideas.
Input: Here you will find videos and content that will help students prepare for the application process to graduate schools as well as how to apply to graduate schools

[Ground truth Answer]
GradSchoolPrep, GoGradSchool, GradSchoolVidz, Apply2Gradschool

[Assistant's Response]
Choosing a compelling name for your YouTube channel that focuses on guiding students through the graduate school application process is crucial for attracting and engaging your target audience. Here are some creative name ideas to consider:

1. Grad School Navigator
2. The Grad Application Guide
3. Pathway to Graduate Success
4. Grad School Prep Hub
5. Admission Insights
6. Grad School Game Plan
7. Future Scholar Academy
8. Grad School Roadmap
9. The Graduate Gateway
10. Apply Smart: Grad Edition
11. Grad School Success Toolkit
12. GradWise: Your Application Companion
13. The Grad School Playbook
14. Next Level Grad Prep
15. Grad School Launchpad
16. Scholar's Journey
17. Mastering the Grad Application
18. Grad School Insider
19. The Application Advantage
20. Grad Goals Academy

These names are designed to convey a sense of guidance, expertise, and support, which are key elements students look for when seeking help with their graduate school applications. Feel free to mix, match, or modify these suggestions to create a name that best aligns with your channel's mission and vision.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: