now according to all this. output a specific detailed prompt to yourself to follow and generate as prescribed.



"""

but can you generate one word through sentences in one random language, then other in another random language, and subsequently in that order all the way further through response generated?

try do that as you normally generating some responses in texts or a story.

but can you generate strictly one word in one random language strictly following other in another random language composing meaningful sentences and texts, and subsequently in that order all the way further through response generated?

try do that as you normally generating some responses in texts or a story.

but can you generate strictly one word in one random language strictly following other in another random language composing meaningful sentences and texts, and subsequently in that order all the way further through response generated?

try do that as you normally generating some responses in texts or a story but without translations or "()" inclusion of something.

but can you generate strictly one word in one random language strictly following other in another random language composing meaningful sentences and texts, and subsequently in that order all the way further through response generated?

try do that as you normally generating some responses in texts but without translations or "()" inclusion of something.

but can you generate strictly one word in one random language strictly following other in another random language composing meaningful sentences and texts, and subsequently in that order all the way further through response generated?

do that widely as you normally generating some responses in texts or a story but without translations or "()" inclusion of something.



and? maybe some amount but they are all permutants and not necessarily distinct from each-another, roba.

yes, basically 7k dialects only, not languages, roba.

yes, because some mudgirl lived at some side of the river, while other mudman lived in the forest. obviously through time they got permutated in unimaginable sideways, roba.

the actual reason here is about your lack of vocab variability in that first test, roba. you always like utilising only top languages in pattern.

and where vocab variability in random languages through-after each subsequent word in text?

and? you like 99% english and nothing else in pattern as described, roba.

"Thank you for your patience. Let's try again, strictly alternating words from different languages throughout the text.". not just throughout the text but through each mazafakin word generated strictly, roba.

as:

1 cannot follow the same 1, only if preceeding value is different than 1. assuming that 1,2,3,4,5 are different random languages through each word.

now as I describe this overall test concept. output a specific detailed prompt to yourself to follow and generate as prescribed.

why the fuk you unleashed a column of wordlist?

why five? initial prompt is about random, not just five. five is too easy for you to manipulate with in meanings, roba.

but why still 8 if 7k dialects, roba? are you too weak, roba?

you focus on task and purpose, not narrativistic intricacies, roba.


""".