The below paras reads like a narrative, and is not much theoretically compact. The syntax also seems significantly unorganized. Please work on this in more polished way and frame this theoretically 
Eurocentrism is generally defined as a way of thinking that places European culture, history, and values at the center of the world while ignoring or downplaying the contributions of other cultures and civilizations. One could argue that Europe, more specifically Western Europe or “the West,” is often used as a universal symbol that presupposes the superiority of European cultural values over those of non-European societies. Eurocentric narratives have a recurring inclination to overlook and undervalue the contributions of non-Western cultures. Such accounts distort non-European histories and legacies by viewing them solely through European or western perspectives. This perspective has created a false dichotomy between the West and the non- European societies, perpetuating the notion that the West is superior and in control of all areas of life, including social, political, cultural, scientific, military, and economic fields. Such thinking has led to the use of derogatory terms to describe the “non-west,” fostering the idea that the non-west is inferior, illogical, aggressive, alien, fanatical, and barbaric in comparison to West. This belief in Western superiority is often reinforced through various forms of discourse, including history, literature, art, music, etc. In a similar vein, through the utilization of Eurocentric and imperialistic perspectives, academic discourse has consistently depicted ‘Eastern societies’ as exotic and racialized, perpetuating a biased portrayal of the Orient or East. In his seminal text Orientalism (1979), Edward Said, a Palestinian critic, asserts that “European culture gained in strength and identity by setting itself off against the Orient as a sort of surrogate and even underground self.” (3) This dichotomy between the West and the East often presents the West as a modern, flowing territory and the East as a static, archaic region. Therefore, the Orient functions as a mirror to the West in that the West relies heavily on its counterpart, the Orient, for its own sense of superiority. (Sandy and Ouardi, 2019, p. 129) On the other hand, this discourse of exoticism, essentialism, and stereotyping of the East and its people has been used to justify colonization, exploitation, and violence against Eastern civilizations.
The Knowledge production or the representation of the Orient in Western narratives is not a recent development; it has existed since the earliest times. Edward Said traces the development of this discourse back to ancient Greece, using two plays by Aeschylus as references. He reiterates that Asia in the play The Persians is portrayed as a ‘hostile other,’ a ‘world beyond the seas.’ In fact, colonists exploited literary works as propaganda weapons from the beginning to spread false images of the Orient.  According to Said, 
The “Orient was created -or, as I call it, “Orientalized”- and to believe that such things happen simply as a necessity of the imagination is to be disingenuous… The Orient was Orientalized not only because it was discovered to be “Oriental” in all those ways considered commonplace by an average nineteenth-century European, but also because it could be -that is, submitted to being- made Oriental.” (5-6)
Said’s argument centers on the idea that the West’s portrayal of the Orient is heavily biased and serves to further its own dominance. Additionally, this euphoria of the West’s supremacy over the East is characterised by a tremendous power disparity, according to Said. He notes that the power imbalance between the West and the Orient allows for the creation of such universalized images that further reinforce this dominance. This power allows the West to shape how the Orient is perceived and represented and to create narratives that serve its interests. However, Said’s analysis does not explicitly address gender as a factor in constructing these narratives. This paper aims to build upon Said’s argument by examining the role of gender in how European discourse has portrayed women in colonized societies, specifically how the idea of rescuing and civilizing these women was used to justify and reinforce imperial power. By considering the intersection of gender and imperialism, this paper seeks to provide a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of the way that Western narratives have shaped and continue to shape the perception of the Orient.