Hello, I am accessibility consultant and i am creating the estimate as for taking the accessibility remediation project. I have created it and also updated the assumptions, but my manager asked me to create the assumption as per the below :

Considerations
Key factors to account for.
Exclusions
Tasks not included in the project.
Inclusions
Tasks included in the project.
Assumptions
Conditions assumed to be true.
Dependencies
Factors the project relies on.
Out of Scope
Items not covered by the project.

Also I am providing you what i have created the content, using that content you need to create it

SL No.	Points for consideration	
1	The effort is focused on fixing the issues on current assessd site, not redevelopment. 	
2	We have not had the chance to investigate the code thoroughly. We would like to analyze the code for more accurate estimations if needed. Current estimates are laid out without understanding the whole complexity of code.	
3	The remediation estimates are based on our experience from other projects with similar frontend technologies. 	
4	The assessment revalidation will be conducted alongside the remediation deliverables. We cannot predict the number of times the team will need to test the same issue, as we cannot guarantee that the issue will be fixed on the first attempt. 	
5	We are not aware of how many environments the deployments will take place. For this estimate, we have assumed one QA environment. 	
6	This estimation scope is limited to QA and does not cover production environment.	
7		
8		
9	Additionally, we will provide responsive development support and conduct responsive testing and mobile testing/revalidation to ensure comprehensive accessibility compliance.	
		
SL No.	What We Will Not Be Doing: 	
1	Non-Accessibility Related Changes: Avoid making changes that are not related to accessibility remediation.	
2	Extensive Redesign: Do not undertake a complete redesign of the site unless it is necessary for accessibility compliance.	
3	Unplanned or unknown codebases or unknown complex functionalities such as Chat	
4	Unrelated Enhancements: Focus solely on accessibility issues and avoid unrelated enhancements or bug fixes.	
		
		
SL No.	What We Will Be Doing:	
1	Understanding the Codebase: Allocate extra time to familiarize ourselves with the existing codebase since we don't know it well. This includes code reviews and documentation analysis. 	
2	Assessment and Functionalities: Ensure all functionalities are assessed for 	
3	accessibility issues. Verify user access and responsive design elements, including revalidation for mobile devices. 	
4	Remediation Effort: Focus on Responsive Web Design (RWD) to ensure the site is accessible on all devices. Implement necessary changes to meet accessibility standards. 	
5	Responsive Development Support: Provide ongoing support to developers during the remediation process to address any issues that arise. 	
6	Responsive Testing and Mobile Testing/Revalidation: Conduct thorough testing to ensure all accessibility fixes are effective. Revalidate the site for mobile responsiveness and accessibility after changes. 	
7	Releasing Support: Ensure accessibility fixes are deployed across different environments: Local Environment Lower Environment (e.g., staging) Main Production Site	
		
SL No.	Assumptions	
1	Accessibility Remediation based on WCAG 2.2 Level AA guidelines is considered for this proposal only for Desktop	
2	The complexity and total 96 Desktop screens/templates & 17 Mobile screens have been considered based on the inputs shared by the Clients. The complexity has been considered based on high level details.	
3	This estimate does not include remediation effort for design changes or modification (if any). Additional efforts will be included based on the client preference. The estimation covers code level changes. If anything requires design level change then the estimation will not hold good.	
4	Current estimates are based on the Tech stack - React JS / HTML / CSS.  Efforts will be revised based on the change in technology stack for the scoped applications. Check with Wade	
5	Additional efforts would be factored for any defects raised during review with additional devices and/or browsers.	
6	Estimation is only for Fixing in English language	
7	Remeditaion effort estimate is subjected to change with the final number and types of issues found after the accessibility testing /envirnoment setup/ code access and software installations etc.	
8	Cognizant has accounted for the turnaround on queries/approvals/sign offs from client -- within acceptable and reasonable timeframe of 5 working days. If no approvals/signoffs are provided within the stipulated time (barring any truly reasonable, mutually agreed delays), it will delay the timeline and cost estimates provided for this effort. Iterations beyond the considerations mentioned in the deliverables tab will impact timelines and cost	
		
SL No.	Dependencies	
1	Access credentials, test data, connectivity to the required systems, application, databases, documentation, etc. that are critical for the execution of this project.	
2	The browsers & Tools– Google Chrome (Latest), Accessibility Tools (AXE, MS Insights etc), JAWS, NVDA, Voiceover, Talkback Screen Reader latest version.	
3	Devices – Windows Desktop with Chrome browser, IOS Mobile with Safari+Voiceover and Android Tablet with Chrome + Talkback Screen Reader latest version.	
4	Remediation team will be provided with a code handshake KT session	
5	Remediation team will be required to have the development environment setup.	
6	Single Point of Contact to prioritize work and provide management support	
7	Timely access to relevant information and infrastructure; documentation, systems and applications should be made available	
8	Business Inputs related to content change(headings/titles/labels etc..), artifacts, images etc.	
9	Delay in signoff on the deliverables will affect the estimates and deliverables of the next stages accordingly.	
		
SL No.	Out of Scope	
1	These estimates do not consider pages not defined in the scope. A change request would need to be raised to assess additional pages.	
2	Remediation for 3rd party/external websites/domains/tool such as Facebook/twitter/LinkedIn components and pages	
3	Design remediation / PDF remediation are considered out of scope	
4	Hand-held (Mobile / Tablet) devices are considered out of scope	
5	Non HTML Content - Flash, Office Documents, PDFs are considered out of scope	
6	Blackberry and Windows devices are out of scope due to their lack of support of accessibility	
7	Any new feature/functionality development during Remediation	
		
	Difference between 2 level of estimates points	
	The assessment report provides severity ratings based on the WCAG 2.2 guidelines, not development severity. The actual development effort may not align with the severity of the assessment. Therefore, we conducted a fresh, high-level analysis from the perspective of remediation and have provided these estimates.