System: You are a JSON assistant. You only reply in valid JSON and never in normal text. Proporcione una calificaci�n de dificultad para la informaci�n del video a continuaci�n. Quiero una sola propiedad llamada "result" que contenga un valor flotante que var�e de 0 a 1. Las siguientes son las categor�as para las calificaciones de dificultad: 
0.0 - Principiante Completo: El material presenta un vocabulario muy b�sico y frases simples, respaldadas por visuales y contexto claros, ideal para alguien sin conocimiento del idioma objetivo. 
0.3 - Principiante: Oraciones b�sicas y vocabulario de uso frecuente. El video puede ofrecer alg�n apoyo visual y contexto para ayudar a la comprensi�n. 
0.5 - Intermedio: Oraciones m�s intrincadas con un rango m�s amplio de vocabulario. Algunas expresiones idiom�ticas pueden estar presentes, requiriendo una comprensi�n de fondo adicional. 
0.6 - Intermedio Superior: El contenido contiene vocabulario y conceptos especializados espec�ficos de ciertos campos. Los espectadores deben ser razonablemente competentes en el idioma objetivo para una comprensi�n completa. 
0.8 - Avanzado: El video emplea un vocabulario sofisticado y construcciones de oraciones complejas, posiblemente incluyendo conversaciones matizadas que requieren un dominio fuerte del idioma. 
1 - Muy Avanzado: El contenido est� dirigido a hablantes fluidos, presentando t�rminos y conceptos especializados que pueden no ser conocidos por todos los hablantes nativos.
User: Leyenda: Diferencia entre NORMA y ESTÁNDAR
👇👇
Se acabó el reembolso del 100%, pero prepárate para algo aún mejor: ¡más clases gratuitas para celebrar tus logros! 🌟
Completa el Sprint normal, asiste a 30 clases en 2 meses y consigue 40 clases gratis como recompensa. Opta por el Super Sprint, completa 60 clases y desbloquea 75 lecciones gratuitas 🥇🏆

👅Código 👉 LINGURIOSA20
👅Link 👉 https://try.lingoda.com/Linguriosa_Sprint23

🥕Mi Newsletter (más contenido gratuito):  https://bit.ly/newsletter-linguriosa

👇👇Si quieres y puedes apoyar este PROYECTO
https://www.patreon.com/linguriosa
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/linguriosaES

Bibliografía:
- Violenta Demonte *Lengua estándar, norma y normas en la difusión actual de la lengua española*
https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/36024582.pdf
- Montserrat Batllori *Origen y estandarización del español* Universitat de Girona
http://habilis.udg.edu/~info/INS/Estandarizaci%C3%B3n.pdf
- Francisco Gimeno Menéndez *A propósito de lengua y dialecto: el estándar* Universidad de Alicante
https://ifc.dpz.es/recursos/publicaciones/26/50/072gimeno.pdf)
- Ángel López García-Molins *Bosquejo de historia de la norma lingüística del español a la luz de la irrupción del español de EE. UU.* Universidad de Valencia
https://glosas.anle.us/site/assets/files/1205/bosquejo_de_historia_de_la_norma.pdf
- Elena Méndez García de Paredes *Modelos idiomáticos y prescriptivismo. El caso del andaluz* Universidad de Sevilla
http://www.lllf.uam.es/clg8/actas/pdf/paperCLG78.pdf

https://www.delcastellano.com/verbo-vale-todo/
https://www.elcastellano.org/el-surgimiento-de-las-academias-americanas
https://www.infobae.com/america/cultura-america/2020/01/29/como-funciona-y-quien-financia-a-la-rae-la-guardiana-de-la-lengua-espanola/
https://cvc.cervantes.es/literatura/aispi/pdf/22/ii_27.pdf
https://www.rae.es/dpd/le%C3%ADsmo#2

🔴LINGUCOMUNIDAD:
https://discord.gg/3kYuqAbzC4

🎁WEB:
https://www.linguriosa.com/

INSTAGRAM:
https://www.instagram.com/_linguriosa_/

FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/Linguriosa-106220947464950

🎵Música de mis vídeos: https://www.epidemicsound.com/referral/bxtod9/

Dorotea (Patreon):
Manel F. Martinez-Aroca Marin
Curtis Walker
Oded Lahat Bursztyn
Craig Ludington

Los Señores de la RAE (Patreon):
Franz Pereira
Pierre Laplante
Leo Edermaniger
Begoña
Julia Mc Cray
Javier Álvarez García
Héctor Vilar Górriz 
Jose Hernandez
Ela Valentina
Jonathan Miljus
Victor Sanchez
Kathrin Mendoza
Charles Lee
Steve Groen
Edgar
Billy Billy
Leonor Loução
Sam
Capatapa
David Bissinger
Victor Tavares
José Horacio Cabrera
John Adams
Portuguese With Leo
Gianluca Repossi
Kathy Rugg
Pablo Torres
sergio valdez
Davide Gemello
Jean Pierre Lefebvre 
DonL
Bo Hemphill
Doug Lefler
Ruben Ferreyra
Monika B
EK Powell
Ttulo: La RAE no puede CONTROLARLO TODO
Descripcin: Finally, I am going to talk about the RAE.
Good? Bad?
Good for something?
It goes against inclusive language, 
but does it accept “almóndiga” and “cocreta”?
Well…
Hello, good afternoon.
Today we are going to talk 
about very important things
so that you can have
an objective opinion about the RAE.
You are going to know what
 is the norm (it is not what you think),
what is the standard (maybe not either...),
what is to speak well and speak badly
and where the best Spanish is spoken... 
If that is possible.
Let's see, for a long time,
 you think that I hate the RAE,
but that is not true.
Obviously, there are things that I don't like
and that I will tell you about in this video,
but they are not all bad things,
 there are also good things
and that is, well,
this video has been sponsored by...
the RAE!
Que nooooo!
But it has been sponsored by Lingoda!
Lingoda is an online language-learning platform
with which you can take courses
 in Spanish, German, French, and English
(also Business English)
and you can take these courses totally free*.
I'll tell you more at the end 
of this very interesting video.
Well, the first thing to make clear 
is that you don't speak any language.
Not even one.
What you speak is a dialect.
All languages ​​are dialect complexes.
But come on, to say that you speak a language
is to say that you speak a dialect
and to say that you speak a dialect is, after all,
to say that you speak a language.
You see where I'm going, don't you?
What should not be confused
 is the language with the standard form,
which is ONE of its variants,
said badly and quickly.
In addition to language and dialect,
other terms that are often found
 when we look for information
on linguistic varieties
are the cultured norm, literary language,
 sociolect, idiolect...
It is a vast subject and one
 that is written and discussed a lot,
but come on, 
there is no academic consensus.
However, when you ask a person what the language is,
the answer tends to be more
 like what the standard language is.
And, of course, what consequences does this have?
Well, if something escapes from that standard language,
it's already wrong, that is, that person speaks badly.
That is to say, we judge everything
 that escapes from the standard language
in a subjective and relative way,
and always based on the number
 of rules that each one knows,
and I repeat, standard rules.
Most people label someone as foul-mouthed
when they say "I have fallen"
because in the standard
 order of the pronouns is 'se me',
but one thing, at least in Spain,
how many of you would say
 that this phrase is "incorrect"?
- “Did you call your parents?
 - Yes, I called them yesterday".
This phrase is not standard.
We have a leísmo like a house
and, wow, leísmo is not standard
(well, at least, not everything)
and I am sure that 
many Spaniards, including me,
it seems like a totally “correct” phrase, right?
[Dorotea]
 Let's see, what is the standard?
Ok, we're going to take a language (or dialect),
well, more specifically, the prestige form 
of a language or dialect,
and we're going to create a variety
 that is the most common to all other varieties,
eliminating all the local features 
that we find are possible.
What we are left with is an artificial form,
something that has been created, right?
And its natural habitat is writing.
Come on, it is almost not found orally.
What about suprasegmental features?
[Dorotea] 
Huh?
The intonation, the prosodic accent
(that is, which syllable is pronounced with more intensity)...
[Dorotea] 
I'll write it down...
Well, these features or even
the syntactic ones are 
not important for the standard form.
[Dorotea] 
What syntactic variations are there?
Let's see, it's true that within the same language
there are very few syntactic variations,
but there are.
In some areas of northern Spain 
the pronoun is postponed to the verb,
that is, it is said “comilo”, 
instead of “I ate it”.
But, well, what most attention
 is paid to in the standard form
is the spelling, the lexicon
and, although a little less, the phonetics as well.
The standard is very strong,
but perhaps not as much as we think.
We cannot deny that the standard influences the norm.
Be careful, the norm 
is not the norm of the RAE,
we have said that this is the standard.
The norm is what is “normal” for people,
that is, what people consider acceptable.
[Dorotea] 
Okay, tell me one thing 
that is standard but not standard.
Well, for example, the leísmo from before.
The leísmo in the phrase “I called them” is standard
because it is “normal” for many people,
but it is not standard.
The RAE still does not consider leísmo valid
to refer to a group of people, 
masculine and plural.
(The one that refers to a masculine 
and singular person is accepted,
that is, saying "I called him" is accepted.
And why that yes?
Because, according to them,
 many educated speakers and prestigious writers use it) .
Another more phonetic example
 would be the loss of the intervocalic d
in the participles of the verbs of the first conjugation.
This is totally normative in mainland Spanish
(that is, it is totally normal
 to say 'comprao' instead of 'comprado'),
but it is not a standard form.
Come on, the RAE does not accept it,
but in general it does not sound strange to us
and it is fully accepted by the community of speakers
(by the community of speakers of European Spanish
and many areas of Latin America).
We have said that the standard influences the norm
(if we are told that something 
should be said in a certain way,
we may start to consider it as "the good thing")
and the norm influences general speech
(because what is considered acceptable is what is used).
It is a chain and, precisely for this reason,
we cannot underestimate the influence
 that the standard has on society,
that is, we cannot underestimate
 the influence that the RAE has on society...
[Dorotea] 
And why does it have
 so much prestige the standard?
Because when it was created,
 it was built on a form that was already prestigious.
In other words, the forms of prestige 
exist in all the languages ​​of the world,
regardless of whether or not they 
have a regulatory body such as the RAE.
Regulatory bodies, when they begin to work,
take as a reference the form of prestige of a certain site
and on that form of prestige,
 they build the standard.
And for this reason, the standard expands
 as a form of general prestige
due to the force that is given to it from different spheres:
political, cultural...
But be careful,
because we often forget 
something very important:
the speakers have more weight
 in the formation of the standard
than the standard in the way people talk.
We have to think that, almost automatically,
the RAE is against all new phenomena
 that arise in the language.
I give you an example.
A very easy way to recognize a Spaniard,
whether you are a student of the language
 or if you are a native of another country,
is that we are saying "okay" all day.
We love “okay”.
Question for the Spaniards,
can you imagine your life without saying "okay"?
What not?
Ok, well, in 1976, Lázaro Carreter,
who was the director 
of the Royal Spanish Academy,
wrote against the use of "vale"
and went so far as to protest 
its "vulgar machaconeo"
(come on, people did not stop using it
and that was super vulgar, in his opinion, of course).
It was felt that there were better ways to show acceptance, such as:
ok, of course, yes, sure,
 that's fine with me...
But what happened? 
Was it discontinued?
Of course not.
As usually happens, people talk as they want
(and thank goodness),
so in the end, as in so many other countless cases,
the RAE had to pick up the cable and accept "okay",
which now has its own meaning within the verb "valer".
Now, something important about the standard
 and that may sound like a conspiracy to you…
Is the standard an element of domination?
Why am I saying this?
The standard is a state apparatus,
it is used at school, in the media,
in-laws, in court rulings,
it is true that with particularities
 depending on the sector,
but it is used.
Now let's think for a second 
on what (or rather who)
the standard is based on.
Is it based on how the lower
 or lower middle classes speak?
We've already said no…
It's based on how the upper-middle 
or upper classes speak, isn't it?
At least the ones I know of,
which are few if we take into account
 the total number of languages ​​in the world.
The standard has traditionally been
 considered an important basis
for social ascent
and the middle or lower classes
 have accepted it as an instrument
to improve their lives.
That is, the standard 
is an element created intentionally.
Its creators want to show 
that there is a way to speak well,
casually and with a high probability, their,
and another to speak badly, that of others.
But, for the record, they have succeeded
because we all embrace and accept their creation.
For example, King Alfonso X el Sabio,
whom we could consider (with buts and nuances)
the first great standardizer of Spanish,
was very concerned about creating the right Spanish
(that is, right, correct Spanish),
which was nothing more than select what
seemed right to him and to
those who helped him with criteria 
of all kinds except linguistic
(in fact, in my opinion, linguistic phenomena
 cannot be eliminated
with the criteria of a linguist.
The reason may be social, political,
 ideological, sociological ...
but not linguistically,
because there is no form better 
than another from a linguistic point of view,
from this point of view,
 they are all equally valid).
The standard of Alfonso X el Sabio
would be known as "dominator"
(we are going to use names 
from the linguist Corbeil),
that is, the classes that rule prevail over the others.
The US standard would be this:
the "good" language is that of whites, 
Anglo-Saxons, Protestants...
But there are more types.
Then there are persistent standards,
that is, the anachronistic.
I explain.
Despite the passing of time,
the standard remains that of a certain historical moment.
The example of this case would be that of Italian,
which was created as a written language
 in Florentine at a certain time
and has hardly changed until it began to be used orally.
And then there are the convergent standards,
which would be those created by a consensus
between speakers of different varieties.
But come on, even if some 
are more of one type than another,
we can find characteristics of these
 three groups in all the standards.
[Dorotea] 
Okay, and after this…
 what's so good about the RAE?
Let's see, this video has turned out to 
be much longer than I thought,
so I'm going to let you assimilate 
everything I've told you
and get to know the standards 
of other languages ​​a little better,
such as English, French, Spanish. German...
How?
Well in Lingoda!
I have already told you a million times 
about this platform
because I like it a lot.
It is very focused on communication
because the groups are small (maximum 5 people).
There are professors from many parts of the world,
which means: many different accents.
They all follow the same materials,
which you can download 
and work on before and after class.
which you can download 
and work on before and after class.
In addition, there are also 
extra materials to continue practicing.
“But you said it was free and 
on the web it says it costs €820.
Now... Let's see, they are not going to 
give it to you just like that either.
This is only for the highly motivated 
(or very stingy) people.
With the Super Sprint you pay:
 a little with the registration
(if you use my link or my code, 
here you get a discount of €20 or $25)
the first month a little more
 and the second month the rest.
All that money can be returned 
to you when you finish the course.
How?
Well, simply not missing ANY CLASS.
The course is 60 classes in 60 days.
In other words, you have to spend two months
 going to class every day.
And if you don't miss any,
 they give you everything back.
I know it's a long time and a lot of motivation,
but there is another option, 
the Sprint, without a super:
30 classes in 60 days.
In other words, you have to spend
 two months going to class
one day yes, one day no.
And if you do not miss any,
they give you back half 
of what you have paid.
Then you try to tell me if the standard 
you have studied is more dominant,
persistent or convergent ;)
Assistant: