System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Based on the given keywords, write a review of a restaurant.
Input: Name: Pizzeria
good prices, quiet place, tasty, nice staff

[Ground truth Answer]
I had a great experience at Pizzeria. The prices were good, it was a quiet place, and the food was tasty. The staff was also very nice.

[Assistant's Response]
**Restaurant Review: Pizzeria**

If you're searching for a delightful dining experience without straining your wallet, Pizzeria is the place to be! This charming eatery stands out for its good prices, making it an excellent choice for anyone looking to enjoy a delicious meal without overspending.

The ambiance at Pizzeria is wonderfully quiet, creating a perfect setting for a relaxed lunch or dinner. Whether you're catching up with friends or enjoying a peaceful meal alone, the serene atmosphere allows for easy conversation and a truly enjoyable experience.

Now, let’s talk about the star of the show: the food! The pizza here is simply tasty, crafted with fresh ingredients and baked to perfection. Each slice boasts a delightful balance of crispy and chewy crust, and the variety of toppings ensures that there’s something to satisfy every palate.

What truly enhances the experience at Pizzeria is the staff. They are genuinely nice and attentive, making you feel welcome from the moment you step inside. Their friendly service adds a personal touch that makes your visit even more enjoyable.

In summary, Pizzeria is a hidden gem that combines good prices, a quiet atmosphere, delicious food, and a lovely staff. Whether you're a local or just passing through, I highly recommend stopping by for a slice (or two)!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: