find mistakes and how i can improve it   \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{amsmath,amssymb,graphicx} \usepackage{hyperref} \usepackage{geometry} \geometry{margin=1in} \begin{document}  \title{Collision Avoidance Strategies in Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF)} \author{ } \date{ }  \maketitle  \begin{abstract} Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) is a fundamental problem in robotics and artificial intelligence, where multiple agents must navigate from their respective start locations to goal locations without colliding with each other or the environment. Collision avoidance is a critical aspect of MAPF, and various strategies have been developed to address this challenge. This paper provides a comprehensive review of collision avoidance strategies, categorizing them into centralized planning methods, decentralized planning methods, hierarchical and hybrid methods, reservation-based methods, safe interval path planning, multi-agent reinforcement learning approaches, swarm intelligence algorithms, deadlock avoidance strategies, constraint-based programming techniques, and lifelong planning and replanning algorithms. Each category is examined in detail, highlighting key algorithms and their methodologies. \end{abstract}  \section{Introduction}  The Multi-Agent Path Finding (MAPF) problem involves finding paths for multiple agents from their start locations to goal locations such that agents do not collide with each other or with obstacles in the environment. Collision avoidance is a significant challenge due to the dynamic and complex interactions among agents. Efficient collision avoidance strategies are essential for applications in robotics, automated warehouses, air traffic management, and autonomous vehicles.  \section{Centralized Planning Methods}  Centralized planning methods consider the global knowledge of all agents and plan their paths simultaneously within a joint state space.  \subsection{Joint State Space Planning}  In centralized planning, the problem is formulated over the joint configuration space of all agents. The state of the system at any time $t$ is represented as $S(t) = \{s_1(t), s_2(t), \dots, s_n(t)\}$, where $s_i(t)$ is the state of agent $i$ at time $t$.  \subsection{Conflict-Based Search (CBS)}  Conflict-Based Search (CBS) is a two-level algorithm that finds optimal solutions by resolving conflicts incrementally \cite{sharon2015conflict}. The high-level search operates on a constraint tree (CT), where each node contains a set of constraints and a set of individual paths that respect these constraints. The low-level search finds the shortest path for each agent given the constraints.  \begin{itemize}     \item \textbf{High-Level Search}: When a conflict between agents is detected, the high-level search branches by adding alternative constraints to resolve the conflict.     \item \textbf{Low-Level Search}: Generates optimal paths for individual agents under the given set of constraints using algorithms like A*. \end{itemize}  CBS is optimal but can suffer from scalability issues as the number of agents increases.  \subsection{Increasing Cost Tree Search (ICTS)}  Increasing Cost Tree Search (ICTS) searches over combinations of individual agents' path costs \cite{stander2020icts}. It constructs a cost tree where each node represents a tuple of cost thresholds for agents. The algorithm explores combinations of cost thresholds to find non-colliding paths within the given costs.  \subsection{Enhanced Partial Expansion A* (EPEA*)}  EPEA* is an enhanced version of the A* algorithm that focuses on expanding the most promising nodes using heuristics to guide the search efficiently \cite{goldenberg2014enhanced}. It avoids unnecessary expansions by only partially expanding nodes that are promising, thus reducing computational overhead.  \section{Decentralized Planning Methods}  Decentralized methods allow agents to plan paths independently or with limited coordination, aiming for scalability and flexibility in dynamic environments.  \subsection{Priority-Based Planning}  Priority-based planning assigns priorities to agents, and lower-priority agents adjust their paths to avoid conflicts with higher-priority agents \cite{wang2008cooperative}.  \begin{itemize}     \item \textbf{Priority Assignment}: Priorities can be assigned statically or dynamically.     \item \textbf{Path Adjustment}: Agents with lower priority plan their paths considering the planned paths of higher-priority agents as moving obstacles. \end{itemize}  \subsection{Local Repair Strategies}  Agents independently adjust their paths when collisions are detected during execution. This reactive approach allows agents to adapt to unforeseen changes in the environment.  \subsection{Reciprocal Collision Avoidance}  Optimal Reciprocal Collision Avoidance (ORCA) allows agents to compute collision-free velocities based on the predicted movements of neighboring agents \cite{van2011reciprocal}. Each agent selects velocities that avoid collisions while assuming that other agents will act similarly.  \section{Hierarchical and Hybrid Methods}  Hierarchical and hybrid methods combine different planning techniques across multiple abstraction levels to leverage the benefits of both centralized and decentralized approaches.  \subsection{Hierarchical Cooperative MAPF (HiCMPF)}  HiCMPF involves high-level planning for coarse paths and low-level planning for refining paths and handling local avoidance \cite{liu2019hierarchical}.  \begin{itemize}     \item \textbf{High-Level Planning}: Generates abstract paths using simplified representations of the environment.     \item \textbf{Low-Level Planning}: Refines paths at a finer granularity, resolving local conflicts and ensuring collision avoidance. \end{itemize}  \subsection{Combining Global and Local Planning}  This approach uses global planning to generate initial paths and local planners for dynamic adjustments in response to changes or conflicts detected during execution.  \section{Reservation-Based Methods}  Reservation-based methods prevent conflicts by reserving nodes and edges in time-space for each agent.  \subsection{Time-Expanded Networks}  Time-expanded networks represent the environment as a graph where nodes correspond to specific locations at specific times. Agents plan paths by moving through this time-space graph while avoiding occupied nodes.  \subsection{Reservation Tables}  Agents maintain reservation tables that record the occupancy of nodes and edges over time. Before executing a move, an agent checks the reservation table to ensure the move will not result in a collision.  \section{Safe Interval Path Planning (SIPP)}  Safe Interval Path Planning (SIPP) reduces the number of states by grouping together consecutive time intervals during which a node is unoccupied \cite{phillips2011sipp}. Agents plan paths through these safe intervals, which simplifies the planning process and improves efficiency.  \section{Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL)}  MARL involves agents learning collision-avoidance behaviors through interactions with the environment and receiving feedback \cite{zhang2021multi}.  \subsection{Learning Policies}  Agents learn policies that map observations to actions, aiming to maximize cumulative rewards while avoiding collisions.  \subsection{Cooperative Learning}  Agents may learn cooperatively, sharing information to improve joint performance in avoiding collisions and reaching goals.  \section{Swarm Intelligence and Bio-Inspired Algorithms}  These algorithms use simple, decentralized rules inspired by natural systems, such as flocking behaviors in birds or swarming in insects \cite{fernando2015bio}.  \subsection{Flocking Behaviors}  Agents follow rules like separation, alignment, and cohesion to maintain formation and avoid collisions.  \subsection{Emergent Behaviors}  Complex group behaviors emerge from simple local interactions among agents, enabling scalable collision avoidance without centralized control.  \section{Deadlock Avoidance Strategies}  Deadlocks occur when agents are indefinitely waiting due to mutual resource contention. Strategies to avoid deadlocks include:  \begin{itemize}     \item \textbf{Detection and Recovery}: Identifying deadlocks when they occur and taking actions to resolve them.     \item \textbf{Prevention Protocols}: Designing protocols that prevent deadlocks from occurring, such as ordering resources or imposing movement rules. \end{itemize}  \section{Constraint-Based Programming}  MAPF can be formulated as a Constraint Satisfaction Problem (CSP) or Integer Linear Programming (ILP), explicitly incorporating collision constraints \cite{yu2013planning}.  \subsection{CSP and ILP Formulations}  Variables represent the agents' positions at different times, and constraints ensure that collisions do not occur.  \subsection{Optimization}  The objective function minimizes the total cost, such as the sum of path lengths or the makespan, subject to the collision avoidance constraints.  \section{Lifelong Planning and Replanning Algorithms}  These algorithms are designed for dynamic environments where agents continuously update their paths in response to changes.  \subsection{D* Lite Algorithm}  D* Lite efficiently updates paths when the environment changes by reusing previous computations \cite{koenig2002d}.  \subsection{Lifelong Planning A* (LPA*)}  LPA* incrementally updates shortest paths as edge costs change over time, suitable for environments with dynamic obstacles \cite{koenig2004lifelong}.  \section{Conclusion}  Collision avoidance in MAPF is a complex and critical component that has been addressed through various strategies. Centralized methods provide optimal solutions but may lack scalability, while decentralized methods offer scalability but may not guarantee optimality. Hierarchical and hybrid approaches aim to balance these trade-offs. Advanced methods like MARL and bio-inspired algorithms offer promising directions for future research. Understanding these strategies is essential for developing efficient and effective multi-agent systems.  \bibliographystyle{plain} \begin{thebibliography}{10}  \bibitem{sharon2015conflict} Guni Sharon, Roni Stern, Ariel Felner, and Nathan Sturtevant. \newblock Conflict-based search for optimal multi-agent pathfinding. \newblock {\em Artificial Intelligence}, 219:40--66, 2015.  \bibitem{stander2020icts} Collin Standley. \newblock {\em Finding Optimal Solutions to Cooperative Pathfinding Problems}. \newblock PhD thesis, 2010.  \bibitem{goldenberg2014enhanced} Meir Goldenberg, Ariel Felner, Guni Sharon, and Roni Stern. \newblock Enhanced partial expansion A*. \newblock {\em Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research}, 50:141--187, 2014.  \bibitem{wang2008cooperative} Ko-Hsin Cindy Wang and Adi Botea. \newblock Fast and memory-efficient multi-agent pathfinding. \newblock In {\em International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling}, pages 380--387, 2008.  \bibitem{van2011reciprocal} Jur van~den Berg, Stephen~J. Guy, Ming Lin, and Dinesh Manocha. \newblock Reciprocal n-body collision avoidance. \newblock In {\em Robotics Research}, pages 3--19. Springer, 2011.  \bibitem{liu2019hierarchical} Ming Liu, Jun Chen, and Wei Liu. \newblock Hierarchical cooperative multi-agent path finding algorithm for automated warehouse system. \newblock In {\em IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation}, pages 2214--2219, 2019.  \bibitem{phillips2011sipp} Mike Phillips and Maxim Likhachev. \newblock SIPP: Safe interval path planning for dynamic environments. \newblock In {\em IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation}, pages 5628--5635, 2011.  \bibitem{zhang2021multi} Kaiqing Zhang, Zhuoran Yang, Han Liu, Tong Zhang, and Tamer Ba{\c{s}}ar. \newblock Multi-agent reinforcement learning: A selective overview of theories and algorithms. \newblock {\em Handbook of Reinforcement Learning and Control}, pages 321--384, 2021.  \bibitem{fernando2015bio} Chinthaka~Susintha Fernando and Liyanage~C. De~Silva. \newblock Bio-inspired multi-robot communication for target detection and tracking. \newblock {\em IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics}, 62(1):571--579, 2015.  \bibitem{yu2013planning} Jingjin Yu and Steven~M. LaValle. \newblock Planning optimal paths for multiple robots on graphs. \newblock In {\em IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation}, pages 3612--3617, 2013.  \bibitem{koenig2002d} Sven Koenig and Maxim Likhachev. \newblock D* Lite. \newblock In {\em AAAI/IAAI}, pages 476--483, 2002.  \bibitem{koenig2004lifelong} Sven Koenig, Maxim Likhachev, and David Furcy. \newblock Lifelong planning A*. \newblock {\em Artificial Intelligence}, 155(1-2):93--146, 2004.  \end{thebibliography}  \end{document}