Rewrite the entire text below, make it sound more coherent and better. Mention everything in great detail, including Hadithes and Quran Verses. Be very sceptical of the author Mohammad Hijab and also add some additional good arguments:

Mohammad Hijab’s argument has been critiqued for quoting only two scholars in favor of a spherical earth, while neglecting to mention several others who supported a flat earth concept. Moreover, he did not cover all the points made by Ibn Taymiyah, who stated that the earth does not spin, and that the sun circles the earth. It is important to be cautious when engaging with his arguments, as they may not be entirely accurate or comprehensive.

In the Quran, the earth is referred to in multiple ways, none of which explicitly indicate a spherical shape. Rather, verses suggest the flatness of the earth, describing it as stretched out, smoothed over, and bed-like. For example, verse 78:6 asks, “Have you not seen the earth how it was flattened out?”, and verse 79:30 states that the earth was flattened after its creation.

Using a verse about the rolling of night and day to argue for a spherical earth requires a presupposition that such a phenomenon can only occur on a rotating sphere, not a flat surface. This interpretation cannot be solely derived from the Quran, thus weakening this particular argument.

Additionally, the distinction between the terms “round” (circular) and “spherical” in Arabic is important to consider when examining Hijab’s claims, as they may create confusion. For example, Ibn Taymiyah is misquoted as saying the earth is “round,” when he actually used the term for “circular,” which is not the same as “spherical.”

Ibn Hazm, another scholar, asserted that the heavens (sky) are above the earth, not around it. To situate the heavens around the earth would imply that parts of the heavens exist beneath the earth, a concept not supported by religious texts.

It is noteworthy that the Quranic commentator Jalalayn mentioned the belief held by most scholars during his time that the earth was flat, a belief that was founded on Quranic verses. This information was not mentioned in Hijab’s argument, thus showcasing another potential oversight in his analysis.

In conclusion, it is crucial to be skeptical of Mohammad Hijab’s claims and carefully examine the verses he cites and their respective interpretations. Additionally, acknowledging the range of scholarly opinions on the topic provides a more comprehensive understanding of the Quran’s portrayal of the earth’s shape.

Mohammad Hijab’s attempt to argue against the flat Earth interpretation in the Quran is unconvincing due to his reliance on a select few verses that mention rolling and orbiting phenomena which could apply to both flat and round Earth concepts. Therefore, his interpretations do not definitively establish that the Quran endorses a round Earth.

There are indeed some Quranic verses suggesting a flat Earth that could be interpreted metaphorically, but others offer little room for such alternative explanations. For instance, the Quran describes the Earth as “spread out” or “flat” in multiple verses like Surah 15:19 and Surah 20:53. Although it may not be entirely accurate to claim the Quran supports a flat Earth, Hijab’s rebuttal falls short of disproving that some interpretations of the Quran might allude to it.

Islamic scriptures seem to endorse a flat Earth cosmography within a geocentric system. The Quran employs specific terms that suggest a flat Earth interpretation, such as “firashan” (فِرَاشًا), “madad” (مدد), “mahdan” (مهدا), “farasha” (فرش), “mahidoon” (مِهَا دًا), and “sutihat” (سُطِحَتْ). These terms convey meanings of spreading, extending, pulling, expanding, or laying flat. Several hadiths and tafsirs from early Muslim scholars, who were considered the greatest by Muhammad, further support the flat Earth interpretation, often citing Quranic verses for their arguments.

The Quran does not explicitly support a spherical Earth, nor does it acknowledge the existence of space, planets, orbits, or other celestial features. Claiming that these verses should be taken metaphorically or as human observations does not convincingly refute the flat Earth interpretation in the Quran. Therefore, it is necessary to remain skeptical of Mohammad Hijab’s claims and carefully examine the verses and their respective interpretations, as well as the range of scholarly opinions on the topic when studying the Quran’s portrayal of Earth’s shape.’’