Given multiple reviews about 1935 movie Werewolf of London, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['And so, Universal\'s Last Great Monster Movie of the Golden Age was Delayed by 6 years because of this bad movie Warning: Spoilers This film was made during the early 1930s when a few of the best monster movies of all time were made. Frankenstein, Bride of Frankenstein, Dracula, The Mummy, and The Invisible Man, all excellent films and appealing today still. Werewolf of London was made the same year as Bride, and this was during the "Golden Age" of Universal Monster Movies, so it will be excellent as well, right. Wrong. The film is bad mainly because, in my eyes, the main character played by Henry Hull was really unlikeable. After his character, Dr. Glendon, finds an herb in Romania(?) and tests it back home, he ignores his wife and he is so dull and straight-faced that I don\'t buy that he loves his wife, Lisa, played by Valerie Hobson, who was also Elizabeth in Bride of Frankenstein. She was only 17 when she co-starred in those two films, and she was not only a great actress, but she also looked very mature for such a young woman. In fact, Lisa is one of the only likable characters in the film, the other being Dr. Yogami, played by Warner Oland, who starred in the Charlie Chan films of the 1930s. Also, Yogami is a werewolf, who bites Glendon in Romania(?) so that Glendon becomes a werewolf. ']

        Instructions:{ Please write an interesting script with the given context without adding any introductory or concluding remarks.
        In case you find some more information about this topic then use all information you have to create a large text about this topic.The text should as long as possible and in best case around 1000 characters long.
        Ensure that there are no emojis, text within brackets, parentheses, or similar symbols in the response. 
        Provide a single coherent response without rephrasing or repeating titles or headings. Avoid enumerations or bullet points. 
        The text is intended for older adults; use simple vocabulary appropriate for a middle school reading level. Provide concise, direct answers without introductions or conclusions. 
        Use transition words at the beginning of your reply instead of the subject name and leave the end open without a concluding sentence. 
        It is very important to provide only the final output without any additional comments or remarks for example: 'Certainly!' Here's the revised text.
         
        Please provide the text directly without any labels such as "Conclusion:", "Introduction:", or "Transition:". Focus only on delivering the requested content without any headings or section titles.
        Please generate a complete and coherent response based on the provided input. Ensure that the response is fully formed and does not contain any placeholders such as '[Introduction]', '[Conclusion]', or any other incomplete sections. 
        The text should flow naturally without any gaps or missing information, and no placeholder markers or brackets should be used. 
        Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words "Reply finished" to indicate that your response is complete. 
        Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.}
         Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.