You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


We look forward to talking to you.

Your data will only be processed for the purposes for which it was collected in accordance with applicable Data Protection legislation. You have other rights in relation to your personal data which apply in certain circumstances and are described in more detail in our Privacy Notice.

*Indicates mandatory field.

Thank you, your callback request has been sent.

There has been an error, please check the information you have entered below. If you're still experiencing issues, please call <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_PHONE_NUMBER> to speak to someone.

First name
*

Last name
*

Phone number
*

Email address

Preferred time of day for contact*

What is your query?*

We look forward to talking to you.

Your data will only be processed for the purposes for which it was collected in accordance with applicable Data Protection legislation. You have other rights in relation to your personal data which apply in certain circumstances and are described in more detail in our Privacy Notice.

*Indicates mandatory field.

Thank you, your email request has been sent.

There has been a technical error. Please call <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_PHONE_NUMBER> to speak to someone.

Early days on a Northern Ireland Brexit solution?

16th September, 2019

The quote ‘Never believe anything in politics until it is officially denied’ has not only been attributed to Otto Van Bismarck, but more recently to Jim Hacker in the British sitcom ‘Yes Minister’. This is good advice. Initial denials from 10 Downing Street last week that Boris Johnson was not considering Northern Ireland-only solutions clearly don’t ring true. The Financial Times reported last week the ‘UK strategy is to hold talks with the EU on “all island” issues’ and that ‘Mr Johnson wants the Northern Ireland Assembly to have a say on new EU rules in the region’. Despite denials from the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) it seems clear that the debate is moving in this direction. Over the weekend, both Priti Patel and Stephen Barclay insisted progress was being made in negotiations and they were still hopeful for a deal.

As the debate around Northern Ireland only solutions has matured the perceived likelihood of a ‘no-deal’ outcome has reduced. Betting odds now imply only an 18%* probability of a ‘no-deal’ outcome in 2019, down from a peak of 44%. Sterling has also benefitted, gaining value, with the exchange rate against the euro falling below 89p on Monday September 16th for the first time since late July. However, we still think the betting odds place a too sanguine low risk on a highly disruptive ‘no-deal’ Brexit.

What are these new Northern Ireland solutions?

Boris Johnson initially signalled the strategy of regulatory alignment for agri-food could be extended to other sectors to avoid a hard border. To bring unionists onside there could be some oversight by the Stormont Assembly. Of course, the assembly is currently closed, but in any EU/UK withdrawal agreement there would be time during the ‘transition period’, when the UK remains inside the EU single market (perhaps out to end-2022) to reconstitute the Northern Ireland power-sharing institutions. However, these proposals clearly fall well short of a fully-fledged, legally binding, workable alternative to the Northern Ireland backstop that the Irish government can accept.

Even if a deal is forthcoming it will almost certainly require at least a short extension of Article 50 to implement – which would be a difficult climbdown for Boris Johnson. Indeed, in an article published on Monday September 16th in the Daily Telegraph Boris Johnson said, ‘if we cannot get a deal – the right deal for both sides – then the UK will come out anyway’. Johnson could still find a loophole in the Hilary Benn bill intended to avoid a ‘no-deal’ Brexit, requiring the Prime Minister to apply to the EU to extend article 50 to January 31st. More radically, some voices have suggested Johnson might simply break the law so that the UK leaves in any case on October 31st.

It is hard to know how genuine the UK government initiatives may be? The report that Dominic Cummings’ said the UK’s negotiations are ‘a sham’ is still fresh in the mind. It is clear some elements within the Conservative party and perhaps even the British government are actively seeking a ‘no-deal’ outcome. The impression Johnson is just blustering his way forward with no clear strategy cannot be ruled out. That said, parliament has frustrated Johnson’s desire for an early mid-October election – snookering his strategy to push for a ‘people versus parliament’ election before October 31st. Rather than risk an election contest in November, whilst the UK could be suffering from the disruption of ‘no-deal’ Brexit, there may well be pressure now within the Conservative government to find a deal.

The next key event is the UK Supreme Court’s decision on Tuesday whether the decision to ‘pro-rogue’ parliament was illegal. Courts in Northern Ireland and England have already found the decision was not illegal. However, the Scottish Court of Session found Johnson had misled the Queen, and hence the decision is illegal. Even if the UK Supreme Court finds the decision was legal under English law, it may be illegal under Scottish law, in which case parliament will be reopened quickly.

Meanwhile in Ireland...

Minister for Finance Paschal Donohoe has confirmed that he will base the October 8th Budget for 2020 around a ‘no-deal’ economic scenario where Gross Domestic Product growth flat lines in 2020, creating a €6bn deterioration in the public finances (or a deficit in the range of 0.5%-1.5%) – which he would expect to close over 2-3 years. This approach clearly signals to the UK that Ireland is prepared should the clock run-down to the October 31st deadline. In addition, it will allow the Minister for Finance address some of the criticism from the Irish Fiscal Advisory Council (IFAC) that public spending has been allowed to grow too quickly and should be reined in.

Finally, the appointment of Phil Hogan as EU Trade Commissioner in the new EU Commission announced by Ursula von der Leyen last week places him in a key position, crucially to ensure that the outcome of any future EU/UK trade negotiations does not conclude with a hard border in Northern Ireland. It’s worth noting Hogan has been one of the more vocal critics of the UK government – often in colourful language. In August, Hogan said “Prime Minister Johnson’s hero is Winston Churchill and he seems to view himself as a modern-day Churchill. However, in the event of a ‘no deal’ Brexit, the UK government’s only Churchillian legacy will be: Never have so few done so much damage to so many”.

*Source: betdata.io, 16th September 2019.

Warning: Past performance is not a reliable guide to future performance. The value of investments may go down as well as up. Returns on investments may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations.

DAVY GROUP

RESOURCES

DISCLOSURES

Established in 1926, the Davy Group is a trusted market leader in wealth management and capital markets, building rewarding relationships that last. We are over 700 people, managing €14bn+ of our client assets, with offices in Dublin, Belfast, Cork, Galway, and London. At Davy, it’s not just business, it’s personal.

J & E Davy, trading as Davy, Davy Private Clients, Davy Capital Markets, Davy Select, Davy Institutional Consulting, Davy Real Estate, Davy Research, and iCubed, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. J & E Davy is a member of Euronext Dublin and the London Stock Exchange. In the UK, J & E Davy is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland and authorised and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our authorisation and regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are available from us on request. Davy Private Clients UK and Davy UK are the trading names of J & E Davy (UK) Limited. J & E Davy (UK) Limited is authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority. Davy Corporate Finance is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. In the UK, Davy Corporate Finance is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland and authorised and subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority. Details about the extent of our authorisation and regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority are available from us on request. Davy Global Fund Management Limited, trading as Davy Global Fund Management, is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. In the UK, Davy Global Fund Management is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland and is subject to limited regulation by the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”). In Luxembourg, Davy Global Fund Management is authorised by the Central Bank of Ireland and is subject to limited regulation by the Commission de Surveillance du Secteur Financier (“CSSF”). Details about the extent of our authorisation and regulation by the FCA and CSSF are available from us upon request. Advance Fund Management Limited is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Davy Fund Managers is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Davy Securities is regulated by the Central Bank of Ireland. Davy Securities is a member of FINRA and SIPC.

Davy uses cookies to improve your browsing experience and to provide advertising which we believe may be of interest to you. By continuing to browse the site, you consent to their use. To find out more about Davy Group's use of cookies and how to manage and disable cookies please visit our Privacy Notice.