Hey, this is an English text. I want you to translate it into the Tunisian dialect. Please follow these steps:
1. Translate step by step and highlight differences between Tunisian dialect and Modern Standard Arabic.
2. Highlight sections you are confident translating into the Tunisian dialect.
Translate this text into the Tunisian dialect, focusing on capturing the essence of the language nuances:

959 N.E.2d 861 (2011) Gordon B. DEMPSEY and Gordon B. Dempsey, PC, Appellants-Plaintiffs, v. Todd H. BELANGER, Appellee-Defendant. No. 49A04-1104-CT-201. Court of Appeals of Indiana. November 23, 2011. Rehearing Denied January 13, 2012. *862 Gordon B. Dempsey, Indianapolis, IN, Appellant pro se. Daniel S. Tomson, Mercer Belanger, Indianapolis, IN, Attorney for Appellee. OPINION VAIDIK, Judge. Case Summary Gordon B. Dempsey and Gordon B. Dempsey, P.C. (collectively referred to as "Dempsey"), appeal the trial court's denial of his motion to reinstate his complaint against attorney Todd H. Belanger. Although Dempsey's complaint against Belanger had been dismissed on the merits in 2007, Dempsey contends that the Journey's Account Statute and Indiana Trial Rule 60(B)(7) allow him to continue his action against Belanger. Concluding that Dempsey is not entitled to continue his action against Belanger and that the trial court properly awarded attorney's fees to Belanger, we affirm the trial court in all respects. We also conclude that appellate attorney's fees are warranted and therefore remand this case for the limited purpose of determining Belanger's appellate attorney fees. Facts and Procedural History This action is the latest installment in an ongoing series of legal proceedings concerning Dempsey's purchase of properties in Indianapolis. As noted in one of these federal decisions, "[t]his drama has unfolded in the Marion Superior Court, the Indiana Court of Appeals, the Indiana Supreme Court, the United States Bankruptcy Court, . . . [the] United States District Court," and the Seventh Circuit. Dempsey v. Carter, No. 1:04-cv-0996-JDT-TAB, slip op. at 2 (S.D.Ind. Feb. 16, 2007). We, however, recite the facts relevant only to this appeal. Dempsey, a licensed Indiana attorney who is representing himself in this matter, owned a property on Kessler Boulevard in *863 Indianapolis which he used as his office. The property also contained two rental units. JP Morgan Chase Bank held the mortgage on this property. In 2004, Dempsey lost a six-figure judgment in Marion Superior Court to George and Oleva Carter. The trial court determined an amount of the deficiency and ordered an execution sale for the Kessler Boulevard property. The execution sale took place on May 18, 2005. Chase, who was the only bidder, bid the remaining amount of Dempsey's mortgage and won the property. Because Chase's bid was for the amount outstanding on the mortgage, the sale did nothing to reduce the Carters' judgment against Dempsey. On June 3, 2005, Chase, represented by Belanger, petitioned the trial court for a writ of assistance to take possession of the Kessler Boulevard property. Dempsey filed a motion to set aside the May 18 sale and an objection to the writ of assistance. The trial court denied the motion and entered the writ of assistance. On July 19, the Sheriff evicted Dempsey and the tenants from the Kessler Boulevard property, which was also the day of the viewing for Dempsey's cousin. Dempsey had asked Chase for a delayed eviction because of his cousin's viewing and funeral, but Chase did not oblige him. On June 6, 2006, Dempsey