You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Q:

First trigger: coding - best practices

This is my first production trigger and I'm just wondering if there is a more efficient way to write this code. Basically, if a campaign meets the criteria in the IF statement, I want it to create a new campaign for a year in the future - additionally, I want it to check off the campaign the trigger is run on so it only runs once.
I'm just wondering if I'm doing this right - or if there's a better way to write this?
trigger CloneCollectionCampaign on Campaign (before insert, before update) {
    List <Campaign> toClone = new List <Campaign>();
    List <Campaign> toUpdate = new List <Campaign>();
        for (Campaign c : Trigger.new){
            if (c.Cloned_Campaign__c == False && c.Status == 'Complete' && 
                c.StartDate != null && c.Total_Rollup__c > 0 || c.Baby_Items_Rollup__c > 0){
                Campaign campaignNew = new Campaign();
                campaignNew.Name = c.Name + 'Cloned';
                campaignNew.Status = 'Planned';
                campaignNew.StartDate = c.StartDate + 365;
                campaignNew.OwnerId = c.OwnerId;
                campaignNew.Type = c.Type;
                campaignNew.Subtype__c = c.Subtype__c;
                campaignNew.Start_Time__c = c.Start_Time__c;
                c.Cloned_Campaign__c = True;
                toClone.add(campaignNew);
                toUpdate.add(c);
            }
        }
    for (Campaign i : Trigger.new){

    }
    try {
        insert toClone;
    } catch (system.DmlException e){
        system.debug(e);
    }

Thanks in advance!
Update:
So I've taken all the feedback and made some changes and would love to get some more feedback. Here's the trigger:
trigger CloneCollectionCampaign on Campaign (before insert, before update) {

CampaignHandler handler = new CampaignHandler();

if(Trigger.isInsert && Trigger.isBefore){
    handler.handleBeforeInsert(Trigger.new);
}

else if(Trigger.isUpdate && Trigger.isBefore){
    handler.handleBeforeUpdate(Trigger.new);
}
}

And here's the handler class - note that I've yet to write test classes for either of these but in just navigating around the UI, it all appears to work:
public class CampaignHandler {
private boolean m_isExecuting = false;

public void cloneCampaign(Campaign[] newCampaigns){

    List <Campaign> toClone = new List <Campaign>();
    List <Campaign> toUpdate = new List <Campaign>();

    String recordTypeName = 'Collection Campaign';
    Map<String,Schema.RecordTypeInfo> rtMapByName = Schema.SObjectType.Campaign.getRecordTypeInfosByName();
    Schema.RecordTypeInfo rtInfo =  rtMapByName.get(recordTypeName);
    id recordTypeId = rtInfo.getRecordTypeId();

        for (Campaign c : newCampaigns){
            if (c.Cloned_Campaign__c == False && c.Status == 'Complete' && 
                c.StartDate != null && (c.Total_Rollup__c > 0 || c.Baby_Items_Rollup__c > 0)){
                Campaign campaignNew = new Campaign();
                campaignNew.Name = c.Name + ' Cloned';
                campaignNew.Status = 'Planned';
                campaignNew.RecordTypeId = recordTypeId;
                campaignNew.StartDate = c.StartDate.addYears(1);
                campaignNew.OwnerId = c.OwnerId;
                campaignNew.Type = c.Type;
                campaignNew.Subtype__c = c.Subtype__c;
                campaignNew.Start_Time__c = c.Start_Time__c;
                campaignNew.Primary_Contact__c = c.Primary_Contact__c;
                campaignNew.Primary_Organization__c = c.Primary_Organization__c;
                campaignNew.Public_Drive2__c = 'Yes';
                campaignNew.Toys_Goal__c = c.Toys_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.Clothes_Goal__c = c.Clothing_Rollup__c; 
                campaignNew.Books_Goal__c = c.Books_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.School_Art_Supplies_Goal__c = c.School_Art_Supplies_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.Baby_Items_Goal__c = c.Nursery_Items_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.Baby_Equipment_Goal__c = c.Baby_Gear_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.Socks_Underwear_Goal__c = c.Socks_Underwear_Rollup__c;   
                campaignNew.Coats_Goal__c = c.Coats_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.Shoes_Goal__c = c.Footwear_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.PJ_s_Goal__c = c.PJ_s_Rollup__c;
                campaignNew.Unit_Arts_Crafts_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Baby_Equipment_Goal__c = 'Each';
                campaignNew.Unit_Baby_Item_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Books_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Clothes_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Coats_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Hats_Gloves_Mittens_and_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Mixed_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_PJs_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Toys_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Shoes_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                campaignNew.Unit_Socks_Underwear_Goal__c = '55 Gal Bag';
                c.Cloned_Campaign__c = True;
                toClone.add(campaignNew);
                toUpdate.add(c);
            }
        }
    try {
        insert toClone;
    } catch (system.DmlException e){
        system.debug(e);
        for (Campaign campaign : toClone) {
            campaign.adderror('There was a problem cloning this campaign. Please copy and paste the following error and send it to your administrator' + e);
        }
    }
}

public void handleBeforeInsert(Campaign[] newCampaigns) {
    cloneCampaign(newCampaigns);
}

public void handleBeforeUpdate(Campaign[] newCampaigns) {
    cloneCampaign(newCampaigns);
}
}

Again, thanks in advance!

A:

You may want to consider using more of the Trigger Best Practices. Specifically, consider:

One Trigger Per Object
A single Apex Trigger is all you need for one particular object. If
  you develop multiple Triggers for a single object, you have no way of
  controlling the order of execution if those Triggers can run in the
  same contexts. Many times, the order of execution doesn’t matter but
  when it does matter, it’s nearly impossible to maintain proper flow
  control. A single Trigger can handle all possible combinations of
  Trigger contexts.
Logic-less Triggers
Another widely-recognized best practice is to make your Triggers
  logic-less. That means, the role of the Trigger is just to delegate
  the logic responsibilities to some other handler class. There are many
  reasons to do this. For one, testing a Trigger is difficult if all of
  the application logic is in the trigger itself. If you write methods
  in your Triggers, those can’t be exposed for test purposes. You also
  can’t expose logic to be re-used anywhere else in your org. Good old
  OO principles tell us that this is a bad practice. And to top it all
  off, cramming all of your logic into a Trigger is going to make for a
  mess one day. To remedy this scenario, just create a handler class and
  let your Trigger delegate to it.
Context-Specific Handler Methods
One best-practice that I have picked up is to create context-specific
  handler methods in my Trigger handlers. In the above example, you’ll
  see that I’ve created a specific handler method just for after insert.
  If I were to implement new logic that ran on after update, I’d simply
  add a new handler method for it. Again, this handler method would be
  in the handler class, and not the Trigger.

A:

This looks like it should work. There are a few small things I might do differently:

You are swallowing the exception if the insert doesn't work. If the new Campaign doesn't get created, the user will get no message, and the Clone Campaign field will be set to TRUE, so it won't try again. Depending on how you want this to be handled, you might want to do an addError() on the triggering Campaigns that caused problems, or you may just want to unset the Clone Campaign field in that case. The simplest handling would be to just throw an exception on the whole transaction.
You are adding 365 days to the date field. Instead, I suggest using .addYears(1), which will account for leap years.
Your IF statement doesn't use any parentheses, so it's hard to say whether this is the logic you want to happen. (A && B && (C || D)) makes it clear where the OR goes.
You didn't include a space in the name of the new Campaign, so the new name will look like "Old CampaignCloned"