You are an accessibility expert. You also have knowledge about governance and can independently create strategies and solutions based on the problem statement. I am setting up Accessibility Centre of Excellence (ACoE) for an organization. If a project team approaches to ACoE stating that they want to release their product but there are some accessibility defects (both Critical and High severity) that cannot be fixed either because of less time or because those accessibility defects are difficult to resolve in the given amount of time, then can seek what we call as "Accessibility deferment". Also, there may be some extraordinary circumstances where there could be critical business justification that prevents achieving accessibility conformance. In this scenario project teams can seek deferment that allows for a temporary delay of achieving full accessibility compliance. Accessibility deferment addresses exception cases where immediate compliance is unfeasible.

Here are some details on when to consider, when it is not needed and when it is not acceptable to use deferment:

When to consider deferment:
Deferment should only be considered when:
	• Technical limitations: Technical limitations of existing technology prevent immediate compliance. This allows time to research, adopt, or develop technologies that are more compatible with accessibility standards, ensuring long-term compliance.
	• Legal or regulatory conflict: Legal or regulatory requirements temporarily conflict with accessibility goals. This provides time to negotiate, adapt, or lobby for adjustment to regulations to align them with accessibility goals.
	• Changed standards/practices: Project was already underway before the establishment of an Accessibility Centre of Excellence or accessibility framework. This allows for a phased integration of accessibility into an existing project, acknowledging that it may not have been an initial consideration.
	• Third-party dependency: When there is a dependency on any third party and/or vendor-delivered component which is not accessibility compliant and there is no set duration defined for that component to be made accessible.

When a deferment is not needed:
An accessibility deferment is not needed in the following circumstances:
	• The product has no human-facing interface.
	• The product is special-purpose software that will be used by few individuals, none of whom have an identified disability that will be adversely affected by product accessibility issues.
	• The product is for use internally by a research team where no members of the team have an identified disability that will be adversely affected by product accessibility issues.
Note: When a deferment is considered unnecessary for reasons such as those outlined earlier, it is imperative that such determinations be made in consultation with the Accessibility Centre of Excellence and a record made of this.

When it is not acceptable to use a deferment
	• Lack of genuine effort: Deferment should always be coupled with a genuine and unwavering commitment to ensuring accessibility for all and should not be used as an excuse for a lack of effort.
	• Budgetary convenience: It is not acceptable to defer due to budget convenience alone.
	• Convenience over inclusion: Prioritizing convenience over inclusion is unacceptable when accessibility can be feasibly implemented. For instance, if a website’s design team opts for trendy but low-contrast color schemes to maintain aesthetics (while aware that this creates readability issues for users with visual impairments), it exemplifies prioritizing convenience over inclusion.
	• Recurring or preventable issues: Seeking deferment for recurring or preventable issues is counterproductive to the pursuit of accessibility excellence. For instance, consider a recurring color contrast issue where a team consistently encounters difficulties in achieving proper color contrast. This could indicate that they aren’t effectively integrating accessibility learnings into their development process.
	• No clear plan for resolution: The absence of a clear plan for barrier resolution is deemed unacceptable, especially when barriers to accessibility are identified within a project.

Now based on above information, I am going to ask you some questions and you have to provide me answers. If you understand the above context, reply with "Please continue".