You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Contact UsTo expand the menu panel use the down arrow key. Use the enter spacebar keys to follow the Contact Us home page link.

NextPreviousDid you mean:You can also try:Search is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later.We were unable to find a result that matches your request.
Please check your spelling or try using different search terms.
If you can't find what you're looking for, or have any additional questions or advice needs, please call one of our Investment Consultants at <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_PHONE_NUMBER>.div1-handle

If your clients think yields are low in the U.S., they should take a look at Group of Seven (G7) bond yields.

When planning for 2018, consider reminding your clients about the critical role that high-quality bonds can play in a diversified portfolio.

Unexpected events have been commonplace in 2017, with 2018 likely to be a repeat in several ways. Changes in Federal Reserve (Fed) leadership, proposed changes in federal tax policies, an unexpected standoff between an ever-tighter jobs market and lackluster inflation, and a second year of unprecedented presidential politics in the U.S. are a few examples of what awaits the markets next year. Where will intermediate- and long-term bond yields wind up in response to that environment? We think your clients might be quite surprised by how low U.S. bond yields could remain next year, and we don’t expect longer-term bond yields to skyrocket anytime soon.

Reality check: What the Fed can, and cannot do

Heading into 2017, the Fed forecasted three interest rate hikes for this year. Unlike their forecasts heading into 2015 and 2016, this year’s forecast has unexpectedly been right on the mark. Two rate hikes are behind us, a third hike in December seems all but guaranteed, and more are forecasted for 2018. Those changes have lifted the federal funds rate by a full percentage point since late 2015. Yet while the Fed is the 800-pound gorilla in the room regarding overnight lending rates, their control over longer-term rates is extremely limited.

Remarkably resilient longer-term bond yields

For any of your clients holding fast to the belief that Fed rate hikes have to drive up longer-term bond yields, the chart below should provide a wake-up call. The chart shows the history of the 10-year Treasury—a security that has a huge influence on a wide variety of interest rates—and where its yield has ranged since 2015.

10-year Treasury yields little changed

The Fed has raised rates by 1.0% since mid-December 2015, yet 10-year Treasury yields are up by only about 10 basis points!

Even more remarkable still, 10-year Treasury yields are up only about 10 basis points from when the Fed began their efforts to normalize rates in mid-December 2015. Surprise!

As the chart reveals, yields on 10-year Treasuries recently traded around 2.40%. So in spite of the 50 basis point (0.50%) hike in the federal funds rate so far this year—with another 0.25% quite likely in December, and already priced into the markets—yields on 10-year Treasuries have fallen 5 basis points from the end of 2016. Even more remarkable still, yields on 10-year Treasuries are up only about 10 basis points from when the Fed began their efforts to normalize rates in mid-December 2015, even though the federal funds rate has risen by 1.0%. Surprise!

Balance sheet reductions shouldn’t pose a problem

What about the Fed’s efforts to reduce their balance sheet, which grew to epic proportions after three quantitative-easing programs? Doesn’t this represent a key reason why longer-term rates are likely to skyrocket in 2018? Ask your clients this: “If you were the Fed, would you want to sabotage your efforts to fix the U.S. economy in the wake of the 2007–2008 financial crisis?” Certainly not, and neither does the Fed, which is why they don’t plan on dumping their roughly $4.5 trillion balance sheet on the markets all at once. Doing so might not only destabilize the U.S. economy, but major economies in Europe and Asia as well. Countries in these regions hold a healthy amount of U.S. Treasuries to help manage their reserves and liquidity needs. So a sudden, huge spike in U.S. rates would have negative consequences across the globe.

Instead of an immediate, drastic downsizing of the Treasury Department’s balance sheet, the Fed plans on a measured, transparent approach that should have a minimal impact on rates. By some forecasts, this reduction process could take up to four years, giving the markets plenty of time to absorb an additional $50 billion or so of Treasuries and mortgage-backed bonds each month. Current Fed Chair Janet Yellen used the phrase, “It will be like watching paint dry,” in reference to the speed of the expected unwinding process. Finally, even though Yellen will step down in 2018, and the reins potentially shift to Jerome Powell as President Trump’s nominee, we expect the Fed to maintain pretty much the same cautious approach that Yellen has already established.

If your clients think that bond yields are low in the U.S., have them take a look at G7 sovereign bond yields—they’re even lower!

Yields have fallen around the world...

If longer-term rates seem unlikely to rise much in 2018, are there better, more attractive opportunities overseas for higher-yielding bonds? If your clients think that bond yields are low in the U.S., have them take a look at G7 sovereign bond yields—they’re even lower!

Yields on international bonds around the world fell in the wake of the global financial crisis, with the European Central Bank, Bank of Japan, Bank of England, and other major banks adopting a variety of extraordinary measures engineered to stimulate their ailing local economies. Much like efforts by the Fed, this helped drive yields lower around the world. Yet unlike the recovery that the U.S. has now enjoyed for more than eight years, some international economies are less than a year into their own post-crisis recovery periods.

So although U.S. bond yields have been rising a bit as growth prospects continue to improve, yields in other developed economies could stay low for quite some time, helping to keep a lid on U.S. rates.

...and yield spreads have contracted accordingly.

With rates generally falling around the world over the past half-dozen years or so, demand for higher-yielding alternatives to government-backed bonds has risen. The problem is that just as there’s no such thing as a free lunch, there’s no such thing as free yield, either. Higher yields generally require taking on increased risks. As we’ve discussed in the past, targeting a specific yield over the last decade would have required moving down the credit-quality spectrum consistently. Where a 5.0% yield was readily available on U.S. Treasuries a decade ago, in today’s market, a similar yield target would require buying a high-yield corporate bond with a lot more credit and liquidity risk. This has caused the risk premium on high-yield corporate bonds in the U.S. to fall to its lowest levels in more than a decade.

A similar scenario has played out overseas. Amid the global stretch for additional yield, high-yield corporate bonds in Europe have watched their yields fall to what we consider unprecedented levels. So much so that yields on these securities are about the same as yields on U.S. Treasuries, the safest and most liquid bonds in the world.

The chart below illustrates this point, and moreover, shows how two bonds with nearly identical yields can have completely divergent risks. This is why we currently consider Treasuries a more compelling value than high-yield European bonds. There’s just not enough potential reward for the associated risks to make them effective substitutes.

For the first time in more than a decade,
yields on BB-rated European bonds are about the same as yields on U.S. Treasuries.

Where do we go from here?

So what would it take for longer-term bond yields to rise in the U.S.? In the end, it’s all about expectations for inflation and economic growth. Neither the Fed nor market pundits know exactly what it’ll take for inflation to rise. Inflation has remained below Fed expectations in spite of job growth and oil prices once again on the rise. We don’t expect to see a sudden, prolonged surge in U.S. economic growth, either. So the idea that inflation is suddenly going to spike seems pretty unrealistic.

With this backdrop in mind, what should you tell your clients? Given how much uncertainty 2018 may hold—from the political landscape, to elevated stock market valuations, to geopolitical risks—remind your clients about the crucial role that high-quality U.S. bonds can play in a well-diversified portfolio. These securities tend to perform best when stocks underperform, providing portfolio ballast when your clients need it most. Also, don’t forget that longer-term rates don’t have to rise just because the Fed raises rates, as recent history proved. Additionally, even though your clients may be tempted to reach for high-yield overseas bonds in hopes of getting a bit more income, Treasuries currently represent a far better risk/reward play from our perspective.

Register now for even more

Access resources developed for institutional use only—and subscribe to receive our latest news and insights.

About the author

Brett Wander Chief Investment Officer (Fixed Income) of Charles Schwab Investment Management Inc. (CSIM), a subsidiary of The Charles Schwab Corporation. Wander joined CSIM in 2011 and is responsible for all aspects of the firm’s fixed income and money market portfolios, leading a team of more than a dozen investment professionals. Over his more than 20 years of investment management experience, Wander has been intimately involved in the design, development, and oversight of a wide range of active, indexed, and alternative fixed income strategies. His expertise spans a wide range of global and domestic markets and sectors. He is a frequent industry speaker, presenting at conferences and in various media forums. He has taught MBA-level investment courses at the University of Southern California. Wander earned an MBA from the University of Chicago and a BS in system science engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst® charterholder.

2 U.S. Treasury bonds represented by the ICE BofAML US Treasury Index, which tracks the performance of U.S. dollar-denominated sovereign debt publicly issued by the U.S. government in its domestic market.

The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an individualized recommendation or personalized investment advice (either under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, or the Department of Labor’s Fiduciary Advice Rule). The investment strategies mentioned here may not be suitable for everyone. Each investor needs to review an investment strategy for his or her own particular situation before making any investment decision.

Some of the statements in this document may be forward looking and contain certain risks and uncertainties.

All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice in reaction to shifting market conditions. Data contained herein from third party providers is obtained from what are considered reliable sources. However, its accuracy, completeness or reliability cannot be guaranteed.

Examples provided are for illustrative purposes only and not intended to be reflective of results you can expect to achieve.

Insights

The pitfalls of fixating on yield

Investors should consider carefully information contained in the prospectus, or if available, the summary prospectus, including investment objectives, risks, charges, and expenses. Please read it carefully before investing.