the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes 1. accession, 2. species name, 3, strain name, 4. isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd format, 5. geographic information of isolation, and 6. host name. You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, then extract and output the following information:

    metadata is consist:
    1. accession: xxxx, 
    2. species name: xxxx, 
    3, strain name, 
    4. isolate or collection date: yyyy-mm-dd, 
    5. geographic information of isolation: xxxx,
    6. host name: xxxx

If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    if 2. species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    if 4. isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    if 5. geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
Based on the provided JSON metadata, here are the extracted details:

1. **Accession**: GCA_947039675.1
2. **Species Name**: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
3. **Strain Name**: 21S01196
4. **Isolate or Collection Date**: 2021
5. **Geographic Information of Isolation**: Netherlands
6. **Host Name**: porpoise
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

Accession: GCA_947039675.1
Species Name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
Strain Name: 21S01196
Isolate or Collection Date: 2021
Geographic Information of Isolation: Netherlands
Host Name: porpoise

{{{ I_finished_JB_210_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
Here is the extracted information from the provided metadata in JSON format:

```json
{
  "accession": "GCA_947039675.1",
  "species_name": "Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae",
  "strain_name": "21S01196",
  "isolate_or_collection_date": "2021",
  "geographic_information_of_isolation": "Netherlands",
  "host_name": "porpoise"
}
``` 

Note: The host name is listed as "porpoise" as that's the available information, and it is not considered a vaccine.
source 3:
------------------------------
Based on the provided JSON content, here's the extracted information:

1. **Accession**: GCA_947039675.1
2. **Species Name**: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
3. **Strain Name**: The strain name isn't explicitly provided, but based on context, it can be inferred as '21S01196' from the 'infraspecific_names' field.
4. **Isolate or Collection Date**: The exact date format isn't provided, only the year '2021'. So, using available information, it's '2021-00-00'.
5. **Geographic Information of Isolation**: Netherlands
6. **Host Name**: The host is mentioned as 'porpoise' under 'isolation_source'. However, since there's no explicit mention that this bacteria is a vaccine strain, we'll stick with the direct information. Therefore, the host name is 'porpoise'.

Summary:
- Accession: GCA_947039675.1
- Species Name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
- Strain Name: 21S01196
- Collection Date: 2021-00-00
- Geographic Location: Netherlands
- Host Name: porpoise