System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
Complete the below instruction by dividing the necessary task into step-by-step simple and primitive subtasks. For instance, these could be comprised of 1. pick up ... 2. go to ... 3. bring it to you ... etc. After completing the task, last step should be noted as 'done'.\n\nnInstruction: Bring me a fruit, a soda, and a bag of chips for lunch.

[Ground truth Answer]
1. find the bag of chips, 2. pick up the bag of chips, 3. bring it to you, 4. put down the bag of chips, 5. find a coke can, 6. pick up the coke can, 7. bring it to you, 8. put down the coke can, 9. find a banana, 10. pick up the banana, 11. bring it to you, 12. put down the banana, 13. done

[Assistant's Response]
To complete the task of bringing a fruit, a soda, and a bag of chips for lunch, follow these step-by-step instructions:

1. **Identify the location of the fruit.**
2. **Pick up a fruit** (e.g., an apple, banana, or orange).
3. **Identify the location of the soda.**
4. **Pick up a soda** (e.g., cola, lemon-lime, or orange soda).
5. **Identify the location of the bag of chips.**
6. **Pick up a bag of chips** (e.g., potato chips, tortilla chips, or cheese puffs).
7. **Go to the designated lunch area.**
8. **Place the fruit, soda, and bag of chips on the table or designated spot.**
9. **Confirm that everything is in place.**
10. **Done.**

By following these clear and straightforward steps, you will efficiently gather and organize your lunch items.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: