here is my essay " I still recall the day when my aunt, preparing to move from her house, asked me to collect select pots from her balcony. She pointed to three in the front, but one in the back caught my eye. It looked like mine. I asked, "What about this one?”

She responded, "Leave it. The new homeowners might use it.”

On closer inspection, I noticed it was broken. As I Picked up its pieces, I found another familiar pot behind it. As I gathered its fragments, I identified it as my own. I realized that without the little blue peacock mark, I put on my pots, it would be hard to say it was mine. It was then that I realized my creations were indistinguishable without my mark.

I started thinking: I wanted my pottery to be remembered, not just by a mark, But by the pot instead. I yearned for my Bowl to be cherished, to be sought after when families moved. I had two years left in my village before moving to the city. These wishes of mine kept me motivated, pushing me to question "conventional wisdom" and defy the way things were.

I began pottery at the age of ten, working alongside my grandfather as a decorator for his pots. I excelled in drawing vibrant peacock patterns. However, as a decorator, I was unfamiliar with the nuances of pottery, like where to source clay or how to mix glaze. I mostly played in the mud, always ready to add my signature peacock to his final pots, never venturing to explore pottery on my own terms.

Starting my own journey in pottery, I quickly realized the depth of knowledge required. So much could go wrong at every stage. I took the initiative to throw clay myself and explored different wheels throughout the village. No longer just an assistant, I now reveled in the freedom of my choices.

We had an old-fashioned wind-up Victrola. My brother and I discovered that winding it tightly could serve as a makeshift pottery wheel. While my brother managed the Victrola, I'd mold clay on its turntable. This unique wheel introduced subtle distortions to the bowls, not making them overtly creative or crooked, but adding delicate nuances to their shapes. Since we lacked other wheels, we continued using the Victrola. These slight imperfections in the bowls resonated with me, highlighting the beauty in nature's irregularities. While perfection has its appeal, I found deeper meaning and connection in embracing the imperfect. This realization influenced me to intentionally introduce unique features into my bowls, leading me to hand-mold them.

I soon realized this connection with nature. While painters have full control over their canvas, potters shape the clay, choose the glaze, and then surrender their creation to the flames. You take that statement of self-expression and put it into the fire. You leave the rest to nature. The outcome is never the same. My options are somewhat limited by the local materials. My exploration led me to local iron-bearing rocks, which, when fired at high temperatures, rendered a reddish hue. Further experimentation unveiled clay near our farm that introduced tiny pinholes in the pottery. By strategically placing my bowl in the upper section of our kiln, I achieved a unique pink-on-orange pattern reminiscent of rocky flowers.

Holding my finished bowl, I felt its permanence. Once fired, clay can't revert to its original form. This realization instilled in me a responsibility to create lasting, cherished pieces that are passed down for generations. Now, I didn't need a mark to identify my work. The profound stillness it radiated was signature enough. This stillness challenged conventional wisdom, pushing boundaries of thought and traditional values. It prompts reflection on entrenched beliefs and societal norms. My work boldly challenges these established views. The bowl, with its intense stillness, invites observers to reconsider their preconceptions about beauty and value." now use all these suggestions and edit/re write 
" My Favorite Sentence: "While painters have full control over their canvas, potters shape the clay, choose the glaze, and then surrender their creation to the flames." This sentence beautifully captures the essence of pottery and the author's relationship with it. It's a powerful metaphor that underscores the author's journey and the challenges they faced.
     
     - Persuasiveness & Clarity
     Score: 21/25
     The essay effectively addresses the prompt and provides a unique perspective on challenging traditional pottery methods. However, some parts could use more context or clarity.
     Suggestion 1: "These wishes of mine kept me motivated, pushing me to question "conventional wisdom" and defy the way things were." This statement could be expanded to provide more context about what the "conventional wisdom" was and how the author challenged it.
     Suggestion 2: "The profound stillness it radiated was signature enough." This sentence could be clarified. What does the author mean by "profound stillness"? How does it serve as a signature?
     
     - Personal Voice & Engagement
     Score: 23/25
     The author's personal voice is strong and engaging. The unique subject matter and the author's passion for pottery make the essay memorable. However, the author could reflect more on their personal growth and how this experience has shaped them.
     Suggestion 1: The author could add a personal reflection on how this experience has influenced their perspective or approach to other aspects of their life.
     Suggestion 2: The author could provide more sensory details or emotional depth to further engage the reader.
     
     - Structure & Flow
     Score: 21/25
     The essay has a clear structure, but the flow could be improved. Some transitions between paragraphs are abrupt, and the essay could benefit from a more creative structure.
     Suggestion 1: The transition between the second and third paragraphs could be smoother. The author could add a sentence or two to bridge the gap between discovering the broken pots and beginning their own pottery journey.
     Suggestion 2: The author could consider a more creative essay structure, such as a montage approach, to weave together their experiences and reflections more seamlessly.
     
     - Spelling & Grammar
     Score: 23/25
     The essay is well-written with few grammatical errors. However, there are a few awkwardly phrased sentences and inconsistent capitalization.
     Suggestion 1: "I wanted my pottery to be remembered, not just by a mark, But by the pot instead." The word "But" should not be capitalized in this context.
     Suggestion 2: "I yearned for my Bowl to be cherished, to be sought after when families moved." The word "Bowl" should not be capitalized in this context."