System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
[Instruction]
Solve for x in the equation 3x + 10 = 5(x - 2).

[Ground truth Answer]
To solve for x in the equation 3x + 10 = 5(x - 2), we follow these steps:

Step 1: Expand the equation
3x + 10 = 5x - 10

Step 2: Move the x terms to one side of the equation by subtracting 3x from both sides
10 = 2x - 10

Step 3: Move the constant term to the other side of the equation by adding 10 to both sides
20 = 2x

Step 4: Solve for x by dividing both sides by 2
x = 10

So, the solution is x = 10.

[Assistant's Response]
To solve the equation \( 3x + 10 = 5(x - 2) \), follow these steps:

1. **Distribute the 5 on the right side of the equation:**
   \[
   3x + 10 = 5x - 10
   \]

2. **Move all terms involving \( x \) to one side and constant terms to the other side.** Subtract \( 3x \) from both sides:
   \[
   10 = 5x - 3x - 10
   \]
   Simplifying gives:
   \[
   10 = 2x - 10
   \]

3. **Add 10 to both sides to isolate the term with \( x \):**
   \[
   10 + 10 = 2x
   \]
   Simplifying gives:
   \[
   20 = 2x
   \]

4. **Divide both sides by 2 to solve for \( x \):**
   \[
   x = \frac{20}{2} = 10
   \]

Thus, the solution is:
\[
x = 10
\]

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: