Refute Hijab in this text:

''Hijab addresses the argument that the Quran, in Chapter 23 Verse 14, erroneously claims that human beings are made up of congealed blood. In his attempt to counter these claims, he presents two primary contentions.

The first contention he addresses relates to the meaning of the word “alaka.” Hijab argues that critics have incorrectly interpreted this term. He points out that medieval scholars understood “alaka” to mean “attached” or “connected,” rather than congealed blood. As such, the critics’ interpretation of this concept is flawed.

The second contention Hijab discusses concerns the interpretation of the term “congealed blood.” He asserts that this understanding is unscientific and demonstrates a weak comprehension of the Arabic language. According to Hijab, the more accurate translation of the word “alaqah,” as used in the Quran, is a “leech-like clot.” This term more closely aligns with the early stages of embryonic development, as shown by modern science.

To further bolster his argument, Hijab refers to a Hadith (Sunan Ibn Majah 3314) which discusses two things that have become permissible for Muslims: the liver (alcabid) and the spleen. In the Hadith, these organs are referred to as “two dems,” an Arabic term meaning “blood.” Although the liver is not composed primarily of blood, the Prophet Muhammad used the term to describe it due to its blood-like appearance. This example illustrates how religious texts often employ metaphorical language that should not be interpreted literally.

Hijab then questions why the Quran uses the term “janine” (fetus) instead of a phrase that more literally translates to “congealed clot of blood.” He posits that the Quran’s choice of language aligns better with modern embryology and reflects the multi-layered nature of the Quran, which aims to communicate with people from various times and places. This, according to Hijab, demonstrates how the Quran employs language that is adaptable and understandable across different epochs and cultures, rather than confining itself to the scientific knowledge of a specific era.''




And use this text below as reference point. Do not repeat the text above, just rewrite the entire text below in detail. Mention everything, even Quran verses and Hadithes. Also add some more good arguments based on quran and Hadith and logic to counter the Author Hijab's arguments. Be very critical and do not try to defend the Quran in this case, just refute Hijabs arguments:


''The arguments put forth by Hijab to justify the alleged scientific error in the Quran appear to be flawed and do not withstand rigorous scrutiny.

Firstly, regarding the meaning of “alaka,” it is true that it can mean “attached” or “connected.” However, it is also commonly translated as “clot” or “congealed blood” in classical Arabic dictionaries and Islamic commentaries, such as the renowned 14th-century commentator Ibn Kathir, who explained that “alaka” refers to a “clot of blood that adheres to the womb.” As such, the interpretation of “alaka” as “congealed blood” is not a recent development but has been accepted by Islamic scholars for centuries.

Furthermore, Hijab’s assertion that the term “congealed blood” is not an accurate description of the early stages of embryonic development is not entirely accurate. At this stage, the embryo is a small mass of cells that indeed looks like a blood clot. Only later in development does it take on a more recognizable form.

Hijab’s use of a Hadith to support his argument also appears flawed. The cited Hadith does not bolster his claim that metaphorical language in religious texts should not be taken literally. Instead, it demonstrates that the Prophet Muhammad employed a figure of speech to describe the liver and spleen as “two dems,” an Arabic term meaning “two bloods.” This example does not imply that the liver and spleen are literally made of blood, but rather that they have a similar appearance or function.

Finally, Hijab’s argument that the Quran’s use of the term “janine” is more in line with modern embryology than a term more closely translating to “congealed clot of blood” is unfounded. While “janine” does mean “fetus” and is a more specific term than “clot,” it does not negate the fact that the Quran describes the early stages of embryonic development as resembling a blood clot.

In conclusion, Quran 23:14 presents a clear scientific error, and attempts to justify it through reinterpreting words or invoking metaphorical language are unconvincing.''