well War welcome to this talk Wednesday
0:03
the 12th of June now yesterday we looked
0:05
at the risks posed by the uh speed some
0:09
might say the excessive speed of the
0:11
development of
0:13
mRNA vaccinations for a whole range of
0:16
conditions we have the covid vaccines of
0:18
course the FDA has approved the
0:20
respiratory sensial virus mRNA genetic
0:25
sequence vaccine whatever you want to
0:27
call it uh influenza uh uh mRNA vaccine
0:32
is now in phase three clinical trials
0:35
and Jose Dr Joseph freman who we've
0:37
interviewed on this channel before has
0:39
issued a statement about it which I want
0:42
to look at he's clearly chosen his words
0:44
very carefully and there really is
0:47
significant concern in my mind and I
0:49
think you'll see in his mind about the
0:51
MRNA vaccine program uh now Dr framan
0:55
had written uh a lead author in this
0:57
paper that we looked at in some detail
1:00
secondary analysis of Adverse Events in
1:02
phase three Trials of fiser and
1:05
madna vaccines and they found out that
1:07
the combined effect was there was a 16%
1:10
higher risk of serious Adverse Events in
1:13
the MRNA vaccine
1:15
recipients and you might remember it
1:17
turns out to be about 1 in 800
1:19
recipients had a serious adverse
1:22
reaction these uh levels of adverse
1:25
reaction are in my view outrageously
1:28
High and the vaccine should never have
1:30
been passed but of course these are only
1:32
the acute effects because the trials
1:34
didn't run for very long it's not
1:36
telling us about the longer term effects
1:38
just the acute effects anyway o over to
1:41
Dr framan now uh listen to him carefully
1:44
and then we'll come back and make a
1:45
comment hello my name is Dr Joseph
1:48
frayman I'm an Emergency Physician based
1:50
in Louisiana in addition I am a clinical
1:54
scientist I was the lead author of a
1:56
peer-reviewed study that reanalyzed the
1:58
original fizer and Dara clinical trials
2:01
for the messenger RNA covid-19 vaccines
2:05
we found the vaccine increased serious
2:08
Adverse Events at a rate of 1 in
2:11
800 at the time of publication my
2:13
co-authors and I did not believe our
2:15
single study warranted the withdrawal of
2:17
the messenger RNA vaccines from the
2:19
market however since its
2:22
publication multiple New pieces of
2:24
evidence have come to light and this has
2:25
caused me to reevaluate my
2:28
position and article published in the
2:30
bmj regarding the fda's own
2:32
observational surveillance data found
2:34
the messenger rnas were associated with
2:36
multiple of the exact same serious
2:38
Adverse Events identified in our
2:41
original study but the FDA had failed to
2:44
inform the public of these
2:45
findings in addition now we have
2:48
multiple autopsy studies that find
2:51
essentially conclusive evidence that the
2:53
vaccines are inducing sudden cardiac
2:55
deaths yet the rate of these vaccine
2:58
induced deaths remains unknown
3:00
known while many nations that have been
3:04
using the messenger RNA vaccines have
3:06
experienced an increase in excess
3:08
mortality more people dying than should
3:10
be expected from past years and this
3:13
correlates in time with the initial
3:15
vaccine rollout and then with the
3:17
subsequent booster campaigns nations
3:19
with higher messenger RNA vaccine uptake
3:22
have correlations with higher rates of
3:24
excess
3:25
mortality while the cause of this excess
3:28
mortality is not known
3:30
researchers analyzing this data were
3:32
unable to identify any other reasonable
3:35
cause of the excess death other than the
3:39
vaccines given now the Omicron variant
3:42
is less virulent and is able to evade
3:44
much of the protection offered by the
3:46
vaccines this creates a situation where
3:48
the benefits of the vaccine have been
3:50
dramatically reduced in for
3:53
hospitalization and and
3:56
death together this information calls
3:59
into question the vaccine's benefits are
4:01
outweighing the
4:03
harm I believe given the information the
4:06
messenger RNA vaccines need to be
4:08
withdrawn from the market until New
4:10
randomized control trials can clearly
4:12
demonstrate the benefits of the vaccine
4:14
outweigh the serious harm we now know
4:16
the vaccines are
4:19
causing well carefully chosen words I
4:22
think you'll agree from Dr framan
4:24
increasing serious Adverse
4:27
Events new evidence as come to light
4:31
multiple Adverse Events
4:33
confirmed things that were seen in his
4:36
original study from the phase three
4:38
trials have been confirmed by multiple
4:41
observations and the FDA did not inform
4:44
the public if the FDA did not inform the
4:47
public how on Earth can citizens make
4:51
informed consent give informed
4:54
consent I think the answer is they can't
4:57
because they weren't given the the
4:58
information
5:02
information withheld by the
5:04
FDA autopsy studies postmortem studies
5:07
essentially conclusive evidence vaccines
5:10
are inducing sudden cardiac deaths but
5:12
we don't know how many because of course
5:15
sudden cardiac death can happen and
5:18
sometimes this could just be diagnosed
5:20
as sudden cardiac death without looking
5:21
at
5:22
the possibility of the uh hemical
5:26
presence of the spike protein in the
5:27
myocardial tissue
5:31
this needs to be done it's happening is
5:34
sure it's happening just not sure of the
5:36
numbers we suspect it's uh a significant
5:40
number excess mortality is correlated
5:44
with vaccine rollouts and booster
5:46
programs in different
5:48
countries and he also says that there's
5:51
a lack of other reasonable causes so
5:54
he's putting together quite a conclusive
5:56
case I would actually probably uh add a
5:59
few bits to it I would say that the uh
6:02
the strength of the
6:04
relationship is improved by the many
6:06
coincidences how many coincidences we
6:09
have to have before we start talking
6:11
about
6:12
causality I will talk about the
6:14
consistency between countries we're
6:16
getting the same increased deaths in the
6:18
United States in Canada in Australia in
6:21
the United Kingdom around the Western
6:24
World countries there's consistency
6:27
between countries and people groups
6:29
and there's a biological gradient so
6:31
countries with a lot of vaccines get
6:33
more adverse reactions countries with
6:36
less vaccines such as African
6:38
countries there doesn't appear to be any
6:41
or minimal
6:43
amounts I would also add that there's
6:45
plausible mechanisms of harm we looked
6:47
at this yesterday the systemic
6:48
distribution of the lipid nanop
6:50
particles the uh lipid nanop particles
6:53
integrating the ribonucleic acid into
6:56
the cells the cells expressing the anti
6:59
gen on their surfaces and the cytotoxic
7:02
te- cells coming along and destroying
7:04
those cells causing inflammation
7:07
potentially in any part of the body I
7:10
think yesterday we
7:11
mentioned I can't remember little organs
7:13
like the brain the heart ovaries testes
7:17
things like
7:19
that there's also lab work which is
7:21
consistent with these plausible
7:23
mechanisms and there's also a lot of
7:25
coherence between laboratory
7:27
investigations
7:29
and epidemiological
7:32
studies from the limited amount of
7:34
pathological work which has been carried
7:39
on um Dr kman freman talks about U
7:43
Omicron being less dangerous therefore
7:45
the risk benefit analysis has changed
7:48
we're sort of plowing on as if we're in
7:50
a crisis well right now we're
7:53
not but we're carrying on as if we were
7:56
to a large extent this uh this new needs
7:59
to
8:01
change times have
8:03
changed Co is less dangerous
8:06
now an says mRNA vaccine should be
8:10
withdrawn now interestingly Dr freman
8:11
here doesn't say um all mRNA vaccines
8:15
but the only ones that are actually
8:16
being used at the moment are the uh
8:18
covid ones the respiratory sincitial
8:22
virus vaccine is not due to be rolled
8:24
out at least in the United States until
8:26
um the end of 24 the 242 5 influenza
8:30
season so we've got a bit of time on
8:33
that and we'll have to check with Dr
8:34
freman whether he wants all mRNA
8:36
vaccines
8:37
withdrawn uh or or just the covid ones I
8:40
suspect it's the more but I don't want
8:41
to put words in his mouth I would
8:43
certainly say they should all be
8:44
suspended until we've got huge amounts
8:46
of new evidence including longtitudinal
8:49
evidence and convin convincing evidence
8:52
that reverse transcription doesn't
8:53
happen to to indicate that these RNA
8:56
vaccines are not changing the DNA D in
9:00
cells these things take longer time
9:02
until that is established I feel there
9:05
should be a motorum at
9:07
least and um Dr Fran says we now know
9:10
that these vaccines are causing serious
9:12
harm so time for some
9:14
humility time for a pause time to
9:17
analyze the um longer term adverse
9:21
reactions time to examine the uh
9:24
postvaccine syndromes like we've
9:26
interviewed so many people on this
9:28
channel about get some firm answers
9:31
before we plow on with this program I
9:33
don't think it's going to happen I think
9:35
governments around the world are
9:36
committed to massive roll out of mRNA
9:40
vaccines in the UK we've struck a deal
9:42
with madna new madna factures in Canada
9:45
new Mna factories in Oxford in the UK
9:47
new Mna factories in
9:49
Australia and different parts of the
9:51
world governments and vested interests
9:54
seem determined to plow ahead with this
9:57
and uh siren voices of
10:00
dissent Dr
10:03
freman me many others of course um that
10:06
we've interviewed on this channel again
10:10
uh I wouldn't even say we're being poo
10:12
pooed just
10:15
ignored the program is going ahead and
10:18
uh I predict
10:20
unfortunately that there will be adverse
10:22
reactions from all of these new mRNA
10:25
vaccines and from the ongoing covid
10:27
vaccines
10:29
um let's hope the numbers are small but
10:32
I fear they won't
10:36
be we'll try and get Dr freman On Again
10:38
actually as uh he's always up for a
10:41
always up for a talk and very very
10:43
informative and a very good clinical
10:45
scientist and consistent with so many
10:48
other concerned
10:51
voices around the world but alas falling
10:56
on deaf ears
11:05
he also said I mean just in the original
11:07
TR Dr freman talked about the um the
11:10
fact that we need the
11:13
um the uh more data the participant
11:16
level data where are we there we are
11:20
um
11:22
yeah
11:23
um so these analyses that he wants these
11:27
new analyses that he wants
11:30
um will require the public release of
11:32
participant level data sets as far as I
11:35
know never
11:39
happened pharmaceutical people that rang
11:42
the ran the trials have this data but um
11:45
independent analysis is aren't allowed
11:49
it we need more transparency as well
11:52
anyway we could go on uh but um
11:55
carefully chosen words from Dr fremond
11:57
uh I feel the world would do well to he
11:59
need them thank you for watching


concisely summarize these in a list