Write it better and summarize the text "It is known from this work that Shakespeare was given a place in his psyche by Dinabandhu, from which Shakespeare controlled the language, attitude and character development of many of Dinabandhu's plays.

From the next drama ['Naveen Tapaswini' - 1863] it is like the beginning of another stage of Deenbandhu's drama. 'Dinbandhu departed from the world of Neeldarpan. Antecedents survive through the creation of comedy. He moved from the direct present to the past.  The discussion of why this happened is unnecessary here. We can only see through the discussion of all those dramas and comedies that in his student life, Dinabandhu defended himself by taking refuge in Shakespeare, that Shakespeare has shed light on his plays from various aspects and helped us to understand them in different ways. Now an attempt will be made to ascertain the correctness of this remark by discussing the later plays of Dinbandhu one by one.

Dinbandhu's second play 'Naveen Tapaswini' was published in 1863 AD. It was dedicated to dearest friend Bankimchandra. Bankimchandra's literary and biographical criticism of Deenbandhu suggests that the play's "Jaldhar' 'Jagadamba' is taken from Merry Wives of Windsor." Jaldhar of this play by Dinbandhu is a minister of a state. who is lustful for Malati, the beautiful wife of Ratikanta, a merchant of that kingdom. This Malati, with the help of her relative and girlfriend — Mallika, the wife of Assistant Minister of State Vinayak, desperately pacifies Jaldhar's Kampipasa. The story and its setting and events are all similar to Shakespeare's play. Here Falstaff has become a waterman. Mrs. Ford and Mrs. Page are Malati and Mallika respectively.

In Dinbandhu, Ratikant is one of the partners in the conspiracy to oppress these two women; (Page: 85) But in Shakespeare's plays Mr. Ford knew nothing of these matters. But both - Ratikant and Mr. Ford are suspicious of his wife. In this context, one would like to recall the behavior of Gajapati, Vimala and Ashmani in Bankimchandra's novel 'Durgeshanandini' [1865 AD].

In 'Nabin Tapaswini', where Dinabandhu turns Jaldhar into a Hedilkutku, Shakespeare has Falstaff boxed up and thrown into a mud-tub by the servant at the behest of Mr. Ford. The almost identical practice of the two dramatists may be quoted here in succession.

Although it is not necessary to discuss the merits and demerits of this play by Dinabandhu, one thing to note is that the story is clearly divided into two parts; (Page: 87)

One part is created in the fantasy of adventure, the love story of Vijay and Kamini, and the other part is the humorous story of Jaldhar-Jagadamba, Malati and Mallika. As in this second story we have noticed the influence of Shakespeare's 'The Merry Wives of Windsor', so in the first story we see the events and similarities of 'The Comedy of Errors'. Like Antipholus of Ephesus and Antipholus of Syracuse, these two twin brothers are separated from their mother and father, and the parents are separated from each other, and at the end of the play they are all together. Dinabandhu's play also has a sweet reunion at the end of the play with the Raja-Boro Rani and their son Vijay. As there Emilia is the abbess of a monastery, here the elder queen is a hermit ascetic.

Apart from this, Dinabandhu has translated some of the dialogues of Shakespeare's 'Romeo and Juliet' in his 'Naveen Tapaswini' in almost the same language. For example, in scene-4 of act-1 of that play, the second marriage organizer says that: 'Fortunate - the name does not matter, only if the appearance is good - Kamalini's beauty and fragrance will not change if she is explained by another name.' Comparably found in Shakespeare:

What's in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet;                                          2. II.


On further investigation, we can see that the main story of this play is written in the shadow of the story of another famous play of Shakespeare, The Winter's Tale. For example, in the play 'Naveen Tapaswini', the elder queen was exposed to the misbehavior of King Ramanimohan while pregnant, but the king and the kingdom all knew that she had drowned in the water. At the end of the play, the king is reconciled with the big queen who ran away from torture and their son Vijay married the daughter of a royal scholar and had a sweet union. Apart from this, the parallels of Shyama's romance with princely Mandhav and the royal clown touchstone-Audrey of As You Like It may also be noted.   (Page: 88)"