paraphrase it fluently and in simple words : When I got introduced to Somaesthetics through the lense of inwards, working through the bodily experiences of my ownself from task. I did not realise the gravity of it even while doing the first task of retro insta(where we had to draw sketches from past to future through the lens of what I think of myself and what other thinks of me and what others actually think). While sharing the assignment with fellow classmates , I never did anticipated the depth coming through me via those sketches that I subcontiously even thoughtfully made. That how somaesthetics was introduced to me. Something thats within and with us through out, thats so common thats so obvious that we often overlook it. Once you start wear those glassses and start looking/experiencing it, you would never get rid of those glasses.
Somaestheics means to be somatically (bodily) aware of oneself and ones surrounding. It is deeper concept which is to be experienced, defined by the way we perceive, perform or present our bodily selves. From the lense of Human computational interactions , I feel the various technology are in place for our ease but in terms of designing, somaesthetically means creating that resonance with those technologies. Those resonance vary from person to person. The real question is for me as designers how can we create that umbrella with so much distinction users who can not be force fit but sentising their experiences of the technology? This was however answered through Richard Shusterman videos, to create that room of subjectivity, by creating somaesthetic profiles of users based on tendencies we as designers can tweak designs. 
How do we inculcate these was a bigger question in my head? This was also covered however, by educating the designers as well as users. Creating that experiencial dimension, as designers we hold that responsibilty by being a user ourselves. We can only eliminate pain and avoid injuries when we tackle that situation first hand ourselves, then can we only make decisions to elevate pleasures. We cant design in isolation, treat visual senses supreme and separate the other ones. We cant conceive the senses separately rather treat them interconnected. Thats the mistake I feel most of us do, concentrate only on one senses. Only focusing on external appearance, rather than the emotion and feeling the product or interaction is bringing. 
As rightly said by Richard Shusterman in his video, we need to "heal" in order to help others. Unless we fell there is a problem, we would not be able to deal with it. This can only come when we start cultivating and bringing the somaesthtics practically in our lives. Because it is not the practice of simply learning, but lots of unlearning, breaking the norms, breaking a habit. This is a practice of creating that sync , rythm between the mind and body. To truely move our focus from blandly perceiving things but experiences the gravity, the intensity of those vibrations caused in our bodies through those mere seconds of interactions. Only if we go in such micro levels will we be able to re define/ rediscover the obvious. The mere fact that we do not have to focus on the object of interaction but the media of interaction makes the story of the experience itself different. Once we become more intuitive, we slowly start becoming more efficient and this enables us to shape and engage with the world and tool all differently.
Even practicely somaethetics is in three folds, which makes it obvious by now as it is not one straigh answer or habit inculcation. It is through 3 branches to hold us(the tree) in a fix spot. The analytics , the pragmatics and the practical. Analytics deals with the theoretical and descriptive part of it, the facts and theories about how it functions across various disciplines namely physiology, psychology, neuroscientically, human social sciences , historically and so on. It about analysing the body practices in particular time or era or area.
Pragmatic deals with the methodologies, ideologies , recommendations that how can one improve perception. The analysis and critics of methodologies and describing those. for me the beauty of Somaesthetics is that it gives us scope to choose rather than imposing methodolgies, it acknowledges the fact that every body is different every experience is different. One can only choose by practicing and choosing what suits or not. And so is the last branch the most important one.
Practical is about practicing. The physical practice can only make us deep dive in any other branches and show us the full dimension of somaestheics.The bosy this way gets textualised and we will realize as I am currently by daily journaling that you start notices patterns , you start acknowledging your own inner self. It makes it so easier to navigate and do the simple act of any of the daily work efficiently. There is a sync between what you think and what you feel. That for me is pure bliss.
For me personally this experiences of Somaestheics have become a medium to ask my ownself and question the obvious. There are so hidden answers that we all hold withing ourselves that we completely forget noticing them and just remain with plenty of questions. Once you start practicing you realize the questions are not to be put only forward and we simply waste so much energy. That concious practice saves a lot of efforts and make one more empathetic and aware for others.