System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
[Instruction]
What was the main cause of the French Revolution of 1789? Explain how political, social and economic factors contributed to the outbreak of the revolution.

[Ground truth Answer]
The main cause of the French Revolution of 1789 was a combination of political, social, and economic factors that ultimately led to a widespread discontent among the population, eventually causing the outbreak of the revolution.

1. Political Factors: The French government, under the Bourbon monarchy, was characterized by absolutism and a general disregard for the needs and demands of the common people. King Louis XVI, who ruled during this time, was an ineffectual and unpopular leader. Furthermore, the existing political system was unfair, with a rigid class structure that allowed for little or no social mobility. The privileged classes, the clergy and the nobility, enjoyed special rights and exemptions from taxes, while the lower class, known as the Third Estate, bore the majority of the tax burden.

2. Social Factors: Enlightenment ideas about human rights, democracy, and the role of the government began to spread, making people question the authority of the monarchy. Philosophers such as Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Montesquieu contributed to this change in thinking by advocating for the equality of all citizens and a government based on the principle of separation of powers to prevent tyranny. These ideas resonated deeply with the French population, particularly the Third Estate, who were more educated and politically minded than ever before. Additionally, social inequality was a major issue, with the bourgeoise, or middle class, growing increasingly frustrated by their lack of political power and influence. 

3. Economic Factors: The economic situation in France during the 18th century was dire due to a burgeoning financial crisis. A series of expensive wars, the immense spending at the royal court in Versailles, and the substantial financial support provided by France to the American Revolution left the country in massive debt. To make matters worse, the French economy was based primarily on agriculture, and poor harvests in the 1780s led to widespread food shortages and soaring bread prices. This was a significant burden on the already impoverished Third Estate, who were further burdened by increasing indirect taxes levied by the government in an attempt to solve the financial crisis.

In summary, the French Revolution of 1789 was caused by a combination of political, social, and economic factors that created widespread discontent among the population. The unjust political system, the influence of Enlightenment ideas, social inequality, and economic hardships fueled resentment towards the monarchy and the privileged classes, ultimately leading to the outbreak of the revolution.

[Assistant's Response]
The French Revolution of 1789 was primarily driven by a combination of political, social, and economic factors that created a perfect storm of discontent among the populace. Each of these elements interplayed to foster an environment ripe for revolutionary change.

### Political Factors

1. **Absolute Monarchy**: France was governed by an absolute monarchy under King Louis XVI, whose reign was marked by perceived ineffectiveness and detachment from the needs of the people. His inability to address the escalating financial crisis and his indecisiveness exacerbated public frustration and discontent.

2. **Enlightenment Ideas**: The Enlightenment introduced new philosophies that emphasized reason, individual rights, and the principles of democracy. Thinkers like Rousseau, Voltaire, and Montesquieu criticized the monarchy and advocated for concepts such as liberty and equality, inspiring many to challenge the legitimacy of the existing political system.

3. **Weakness of the Estates-General**: The Estates-General, convened in 1789 to address the financial crisis, highlighted the power imbalance within French society. The Third Estate, representing the common people, felt marginalized and underrepresented, leading to the formation of the National Assembly and a push for a more equitable political structure.

### Social Factors

1. **Class Discontent**: French society was stratified into three estates: the clergy (First Estate), the nobility (Second Estate), and the commoners (Third Estate). The Third Estate, which constituted the majority of the population, bore the burden of heavy taxation while enjoying little political power. This inequality bred resentment and a strong desire for change.

2. **Rise of the Bourgeoisie**: The bourgeoisie, or middle class, were educated and economically successful individuals who lacked political influence. Their aspirations for greater rights and recognition, coupled with resentment towards the privileges of the aristocracy, further fueled revolutionary sentiments.

3. **Popular Discontent**: Widespread dissatisfaction among the lower classes was exacerbated by economic hardships, including food shortages and rising bread prices. The dire living conditions faced by the common people intensified their grievances and contributed to the revolutionary fervor.

### Economic Factors

1. **Financial Crisis**: France was in a state of financial turmoil due to extravagant royal spending, costly military engagements (notably the American Revolution), and a regressive tax system that disproportionately affected the Third Estate. The government was on the brink of bankruptcy, prompting urgent calls for reform.

2. **Taxation Inequality**: The tax burden fell heavily on the Third Estate, while the First and Second Estates enjoyed numerous exemptions. This inequity fostered a sense of injustice and resentment among the common people, further motivating demands for change.

3. **Economic Hardship**: Poor harvests in the late 1780s led to food scarcity and soaring prices, particularly for bread, which was a staple in the French diet. The economic strain on the lower classes heightened their frustrations and contributed to widespread protests.

### Conclusion

In summary, the French Revolution of 1789 was the result of a complex interplay of political, social, and economic factors that created a climate of dissatisfaction and unrest. The demand for political representation, social equality, and economic relief motivated the revolutionaries to challenge the established order, ultimately leading to the overthrow of the monarchy and the establishment of a republic. The revolution not only transformed France but also had lasting implications worldwide, inspiring future movements for democracy and social justice.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: