As a Canadian M.Sc. student of HRM, I have an assignment and i want you to give me a very detailed structure to get this done.
The brief goes thus:

Module learning outcomes assessed by this task:
1. MO1: Understand the nature of contemporary people management in its broader context (including product markets, business strategy, labour markets, organisations, occupational structures, industry sector and national business systems)
2. MO3: Critically assess core concepts and contemporary practice in HRM, including reward and performance management, employee involvement and resourcing, and the role of tech in the delivery of HRM.
3. MO5: Understand critical HRM concerns, including ethical decision-making and managing diversity

Completing your assessment 
This is an individual written assignment which requires students to write a 1,500 word literature review based on one of the topics raised in the final consultancy case study. 

What am I required to do on this assessment?
 Evidence understanding of the topic and key theories
 Demonstrates critical appreciation of relevant theory and empirical research
 Draw from relevant, academic sources to work
 Assignment is written in accordance with traditional academic requirements
 Sources should be cited and referenced using the Harvard system

What do I need to do to pass? 
The following criteria are considered when marking:
1. Literature coverage and subject knowledge
2. Critical evaluation
3. Narrative and structure
4. Use of literature and other sources
5. Writing quality

How do I achieve high marks in this assessment? 
Demonstrate the following:
1. Original and innovative use of an impressive range of sources, many beyond those recommended for the topic. Outstanding coverage of all key aspects of the topics literature. Excellent theoretical and conceptual grounding and ability to contextualise key theories and debates within the literature.
2. Outstanding attempt present, critique and contextualise the literature by making judgements about information, validity of ideas and theories or quality of research on a set of theoretically-based criteria. Outstanding links are made between theory 
and relevant examples and practice.
3. Clear and holistic evaluation of the current literature on the topic. Outstanding level of depth and sophistication. Excellent structure which helps develop detailed and comprehensive understanding of all key debates and the themes which underly 
them. No irrelevant material. Evidence of independent, insightful, innovative thought. 
4. Outstanding use of external sources, referencing that conforms precisely to UWE Harvard requirements.
5. Highest standards of literacy (i.e. academic vocabulary, spelling) and presentation. Outstanding clarity, structure and organisation (including paragraph structure, introduction and conclusion). Excellent logical flow throughout. Direction of 
argument is clearly signposted throughout.

Marking Guide is as follows
LITERATURE COVERAGE AND SUBJECT KNOWLEDGE 20% - Original / innovative use of animpressive range of sources, many beyond those recommended for the topic. Outstanding coverage of all key aspects of the topics literature. Excellent theoretical / conceptual grounding and ability to contextualise key theories/debates within the literature. (18-20 marks)
CRITICAL EVALUATION 30% - Outstanding attempt present, critique and contextualise the literature by making judgements about information, validity ofideas/theory or qualityof research on a set of theoretically-based criteria. Outstanding links are made between theory and relevant examples /practice. (27-30 marks)
NARRATIVE AND STRUCTURE 25% - Clear and holistic evaluation of the current literature on the topic. Outstanding level of depth and sophistication. Excellent structure which helps develop detailed and comprehensive understanding of all key debates and the themes which underly them. No irrelevant material. Evidence of independent, insightful, innovative thought. (23-25 marks)
USE OF LITERATURE AND OTHER SOURCES 10% - Outstanding use of external sources, referencing that conforms precisely to UWE Harvard requirements. (9-10 marks)
WRITING QUALITY 15% - Highest standards of literacy (i.e. academic vocabulary, spelling) and presentation. Outstanding clarity, structure and organisation (including paragraph structure, introduction and conclusion). Excellent logical flow throughout. 
Direction of argument is clearly signposted throughout. (13-15 marks)