System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
As a superhero, how would you explain your origin story to a curious child?

[Ground truth Answer]
Once upon a time, in a normal neighborhood, there lived a person just like you and me. This person was kind, helpful, and enjoyed doing simple everyday things. But one day, they discovered that they had a very special gift!

You see, when they were a child, they were accidentally exposed to a mysterious energy source. This energy source gave them incredible powers that no one else had. At first, they were scared and didn't know what to do with these powers, but over time, they learned to control and use them for good. They knew that they were given this gift for a reason, so they decided to use it to help others and make the world a better place.

So, they put on a colorful costume, a mask to keep their identity a secret, and went out into the world as a superhero! They fought bad guys, helped those in need and protected the innocent. Everyone loved and admired this hero, as they continued to use their powers for good and inspired others to help make a difference.

And that, my little friend, is the story of how this superhero came to be. Never forget that everyone has the potential to be a hero in their own way – even you. So always be kind, helpful, and ready to lend a helping hand, just like a true superhero!

[Assistant's Response]
Well, kiddo, let me share my origin story with you! It all began on a regular day, just like any other. I was going about my life, dreaming of adventure, when I stumbled upon something truly special—maybe it was a glowing crystal or a magical book. When I touched it, I felt a rush of energy, and suddenly, I discovered I had amazing powers!

At first, I was a little scared and unsure of what to do with these new abilities. But then I realized I could use them to help people! I practiced my powers, learned how to fly, or maybe even talk to animals. With my cool costume and a new superhero name, I decided to use my powers for good.

Now, I protect my city and help those in need, all while trying to inspire others to be brave and kind. So remember, every superhero has a story, and sometimes, it all starts with a little bit of magic and a big heart!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: