System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
Why might someone choose to use a paper map or ask for directions instead of relying on a GPS device or smartphone app?

[Ground truth Answer]
There are several reasons someone might choose to use a paper map or ask for directions instead of relying on a GPS device or smartphone app:

1. Limited or no access to technology: Some people might not have a GPS device or a smartphone or might be in an area with limited or no cell service, making it difficult to access digital navigation tools.

2. Nostalgia or personal preference: Some people may prefer the tactile experience of using a paper map or the social aspect of asking for directions from locals, as it offers a more immersive and memorable experience.

3. Reliability and accuracy: Digital maps can sometimes be inaccurate or outdated and may not always account for road closures, detours, or hazards. Physical maps, while not always being up to date, offer a more constant point of reference and can be more reliable than a digital app that relies on internet connectivity.

4. Saving battery life: Using GPS or map apps on a smartphone can quickly drain the battery, which can be problematic during long trips or in areas where charging options are limited.

5. Developing navigational skills: Relying solely on GPS or smartphone apps for navigation can lead to a deterioration of map-reading and navigational skills. Using a paper map or asking for directions forces individuals to develop and maintain these abilities.

6. Avoiding distractions: Smartphones and GPS devices can have numerous features and notifications that may distract the user while driving or traveling. Using a paper map or asking for directions limits these distractions and helps individuals focus on their route.

7. Better route planning: Paper maps provide a larger view of an area, making it easier to plan alternate routes or explore options that might not be apparent on a GPS device or app that focuses on a particular path.

8. Costs: GPS devices or smartphones can be expensive or require ongoing data usage, which might not be affordable or desirable for everyone. Paper maps and asking for directions are generally cheaper alternatives.

[Assistant's Response]
There are several reasons why someone might prefer using a paper map or asking for directions instead of relying on a GPS device or smartphone app:

1. **Battery Life and Connectivity**: Paper maps don’t require battery power or internet connectivity, making them reliable in situations where devices might run out of battery or lose signal.

2. **Broader Perspective**: Paper maps offer a wider view of an area, allowing users to see multiple routes and points of interest that might not be highlighted by GPS apps.

3. **Familiarity and Comfort**: Some individuals find traditional navigation methods more intuitive and easier to read than digital maps.

4. **Privacy Concerns**: Using a paper map or asking for directions doesn’t involve sharing location data, which can be a concern for those worried about privacy.

5. **Learning and Memory**: Navigating with a paper map can enhance spatial awareness and memory, as it encourages more active engagement with the surroundings.

6. **Reliability**: Paper maps are not prone to technical glitches or errors that can sometimes affect GPS devices, such as incorrect routing or outdated information.

7. **Cultural and Social Interaction**: Asking for directions can foster social interactions and provide local insights that a GPS device might not offer.

8. **Cost**: Paper maps are often free or low-cost, while using a smartphone for navigation may incur data charges, especially when traveling internationally.

9. **Aesthetic and Sentimental Value**: Many people enjoy the tactile experience of using a paper map and appreciate its aesthetic or sentimental value, especially when traveling.

These factors can make paper maps and personal interactions appealing choices for some, despite the convenience of digital navigation tools.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: