Hey, this is an English text. I want you to translate it into the Tunisian dialect. Please follow these steps:
1. Translate step by step and highlight differences between Tunisian dialect and Modern Standard Arabic.
2. Highlight sections you are confident translating into the Tunisian dialect.
Translate this text into the Tunisian dialect, focusing on capturing the essence of the language nuances:

Friday, May 20, 2011 AS EK ÉÉN WOORD GLIM, MOET EK ÁLMAL GLIM I realize you probably think I'm a 'conspiracy theorist'. I also realize you are probably not inclined to believe anything I say that smacks of a 'conspiracy theory'. Very well. What we should all be able to agree upon is that it is vital for a free man (or woman) to be capable of critical thinking. What is 'critical thinking'? First, an example of what it is not: Critical Thinking is not turning on the television, hearing a story, and saying "Hallelujah! I've heard the truth!" For a real life example from recent news, let’s take the story about Osama bin Laden's death. Despite the fact that I have been saying the man is dead for years, it is now 'ok' and within the public perception of 'normal' to say "I believe the man is dead." Why? Because anyone did any investigating or research into the life and death of Osama bin Laden? Because you or someone you know physically touched his lifeless corpse? No. Because the TV told you. A healthy amount of skepticism demands some sort of evidence, some sort of proof. Citing a news source does not equal proof. Saying 'because Fox News said so' doesn't make it any more true than if I said 'because Alex Jones said so'. It's not just that people believe it, it's alarming how EASILY they believe it. This opinion went from 'only kooks say he's dead' to 'everyone knows he's dead' in the span of 1 hour. Just *poof* the tv said it, so it's true. There is no journalism going on. There is nobody asking a hard question. This is a White House press release being passed to the American people from all directions, by all news sources, completely unaltered and without investigation -- literally, government propaganda -- from an administration that some 60% of the populace claim to dislike. So why does the TV's magic 'say-so' verify the truth of this propaganda without question for so many? The implications of this are both astounding and frightening. The hard questions need to be asked. The difference between 'propaganda' and 'journalism' is the necessary process of close scrutiny of bold claims. Reading a press release verbatim is not journalism. To believe such 'news' requires implicit faith in the source (in this case, the Obama administration.) I do not have such faith. I do not relish the thought of being portrayed as a 'conspiracy theorist' for insisting on such old-fashioned standards, but if that's the label I get slapped with, so be it. But, I said this was about Critical Thinking, and so it is. If we want to 'think critically', how can we analyze this news, or all news? I have devised a sort of test. Since 9/11 we have been subjected to a whole new world of government oversight. We have had the Patriot Act, the Department of Homeland Security, and the TSA arise out of