Given multiple reviews about 1976 tv series Three's Company, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['"Three\'s Company" was a hit back in the \'70s because it gave TV audiences what they wanted back then, and gave them only what they could handle. The show had a very sexy premise (a young man sharing an apartment with two attractive young woman) that suggested all sorts of sexual hijinks, but in practice, nothing sexual ever really happened. When you come down to it, despite its reputation, it was a very chaste show. During all the years the show was on the air, poor Jack Tripper never once managed to get any of his sexy roommates into bed, despite living in their apartment. There was no nudity, no sex, only an occasional glimpse of the girls in slightly suggestive outfits, and a lot of double-entendre gags. And that fit 1970\'s America, when audiences were attracted by sexual teases, but didn\'t really want to see anything explicit on TV. Chrissy bending over in her shorty nightgown and inadvertently showing her cute, ruffled panties was about as much as TV audiences back then could handle. At the time, free broadcast network TV was all that was available to most people, there were no pay channels yet showing explicit content. So all TV content had to be family-friendly. TV was essentially a G-rated medium (or, at most, PG). Porn was virtually nonexistent in most people\'s lives (unless you count Playboy magazine). Viewers were watching the show in their living rooms with their kids, and they would\'ve been shocked if Jack had ever actually scored with either of the girls. For most Americans in the \'70s, who had relatively conservative attitudes about sex, it was enough to have shows that SEEMED sexy, but which were actually very mild. Lots of bluff, plenty of suggestiveness... but no follow-through. \'70s TV was filled with examples like "Charlie\'s Angels", "Love American Style", "The Dating Game" and "The Love Boat", which seemed to promise sex, but only delivered pretty young girls, sometimes in mildly skimpy outfits, a little romance, and some pseudo-sexual situations that never really went anywhere. "Three\'s Company" was a product of its time. It was a sexy tease, but ONLY a tease, and that was exactly what American TV audiences wanted back then.'] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.