You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Tánaiste and Minister for Foreign Affairs Simon Coveney has said the EU needs to see an approach coming from the British government that allows for free flowing trade on the island of Ireland.

Speaking on RTÉ’s News At One, Mr Coveney said that the EU is trying to protect the status quo on the island of Ireland and will work with the British government.

The EU’s draft legal text on Brexit has proposed that the territory of Northern Ireland shall be "considered part of the customs territory of the EU" in the event of the alignment option contained in last December’s political agreement coming into effect.

The legal text spells out in detail the way in which Northern Ireland would remain within the customs union and single market, if other solutions are not found.

As reported last night by RTÉ News, the text speaks of a "common regulatory area" on the island of Ireland governing customs, VAT, energy, the environment and agriculture.

The text says that the European Court of Justice would continue to have jurisdiction over Northern Ireland where EU rules apply.

Northern Ireland would also have to abide by EU state aid rules if the default alignment solution - or Option C - takes effect.

There would be joint EU-UK customs checks on goods coming into this new regulatory space.

Read: Foster says draft Brexit plans are 'unacceptable'

Addressing a news conference in Brussels, the EU’s chief negotiator Michel Barnier said the draft text faithfully reflected the commitments made by the EU and UK in December.

He said: "The backstop [Option C] is the only way to guarantee that the joint commitments will be upheld in all circumstances."

Mr Coveney said today's text provides reassurance on a "fallback position" in the absence of an Option A from the British government.

He said: "Nobody's looking to pick a fight here, or have a go at the British government, or their position.

"We need to have some certainty, and what the EU has done here is put a draft withdrawal treaty in place, and, of course, that leaves open the option of a new approach."

He said the EU want to support the British government on an Option A, but, he said, it is hard to see that being done if the British government continues to pursue the insistence of leaving the customs union and single market.

Meanwhile, Mr Barnier said he will meet Sinn Féin’s Michelle O’Neill and the DUP’s Arlene Foster in Brussels early next week.

Barnier: 'The withdrawal agreement must also contain a solution to avoid a hard border' | https://t.co/HiQFShfJz5 pic.twitter.com/HeKc2ZFPVk — RTÉ News (@rtenews) February 28, 2018

He added: "Daily life around the border should continue as today. Already today NI has rules in place that are different from the UK."

Mr Barnier was asked repeatedly if the draft text interfered with the constitutional order of the UK.

He replied: "I know the consitutional order of the UK and we all have to respect that, and in respecting that order... we're trying in practical, pragmatic terms within the law, we're trying to find solutions [to the Irish border issue].

"This backstop will not call into question the constitutional order of the UK. We will respect that," he added.

When asked if the effect of the text would mean a border along the Irish Sea, Mr Barnier said that there could be "technological solutions", as envisaged in Option B, in "ports and aiports". But he would not regard this as a border.

Mr Barnier said he was prepared to discuss the UK's preferred options of A and B. "We are waiting," he said.

But, he said, the EU's responsibility was to citizens North and South, the Good Friday Agreement, and at the time of the signing of the Withdrawal Agreement [in October] "we need an operational solution."

Mr Barnier denied he was attempting to provoke the UK.

"Brexit was a unlilateral decision", he said, "and we were now just 13 months away from the departure date".

Mr Barnier has also called on London to "pick up the pace" of talks if it wants a deal this year.

"If we wish to make a success of these negotiations ... we must pick up the pace," he said.

UK must detail alternative border proposals - Varadkar

The Taoiseach has said it is up to Britain to bring proposals to the table if it does not wish to trigger a backstop agreement that would fully align Northern Ireland with the rules of the EU to avoid a hard border.

"Now it is up to the UK to bring proposals to the table to make that possible," Leo Varadkar told Newstalk, adding the draft Brexit withdrawal treaty will put into legal effect the backstop arrangement or "Option C" agreed by negotiators in December.

He said: "It's not okay for people, whether pro-Brexit politicians in Britain, people or parties in Northern Ireland, to just say no now.

The Taoiseach added: "It's incumbent on them if they can't accept the backstop, well then they must detail how Option A or B would work."

He said: "One mistake we shouldn't make is a mistake that a lot of people seem to be making, that one of the political parties, the DUP - as important as it is and as big as it is - speaks for everyone in Northern Ireland."

He said the business community in particular did not want any new borders.

It comes as British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson has claimed the issue of the border is being used to try to keep Britain in a customs union with the European Union and frustrate Brexit.

"The issue of the Northern Ireland border is being used quite a lot politically to try to keep the UK in the customs union and effectively the single market, so we can't really leave the EU," Mr Johnson told Sky News, adding there were options to allow Britain to leave the customs union without having a hard Northern Irish border.

Responding to yesterday's reports of the draft legal text, DUP deputy leader Nigel Dodds said the reported details regarding the proposals for a hard border are a "ludicrous" suggestion that will not go anywhere.

"This is a ludicrous over-the-top suggestion put forward by Michel Barnier. It will not go anywhere.

"The way forward is to get into the trade talks and then and only then will you know what the border arrangements need to be," he told BBC Radio Ulster.

Boris Johnson yesterday suggested that the British government should focus on preventing the border becoming "significantly" harder, reigniting a row over the issue.

Mr Johnson added: "What the letter says is that, actually, there are very good solutions that you could put in place that would obviate, prevent any kind of hard border but would allow goods... to move freely without hindrance whilst allowing the UK to come out of the customs union, take back control of our tariffs schedules, take back control of our commercial policy, take back control of our regulation. It is a very positive letter."

Downing Street insisted that the government is focused on "no hard border".

Mr Johnson said that "even if a hard border is reintroduced" on the island of Ireland, the vast majority of goods would not be checked.