What do you think of this fictional law I made up?

The Non-Human Protected individual Clause
This clause states that when a non-human individuals are protected and any illegal actions taken on the individual will be recognized on a federal trial and the actions will be recognized on the same level as if it were to be done against a human. The species that are recognized in this clause are: dolphins.

Based on this clause, what would happen if the government was to enact this law. What are it’s implications, and what happens to marine parks that solely use dolphins for entertainment purposes? How would this affect the general publics perspective to the world as a whole? How would the world change as of this aspect?
The fictional “Non-Human Protected Individual Clause” you’ve presented opens up numerous avenues for discussion, analysis, and speculation. If a government were to enact such a law, here are some potential implications and scenarios that might arise:

1. Legal Status of Dolphins: This clause grants dolphins a unique legal status, similar to that of humans. This would be unprecedented and would require significant changes to existing laws and legal frameworks. Lawsuits and litigation concerning dolphins’ welfare would become more frequent and complex, possibly involving a variety of experts from marine biology to ethics.

2. Marine Entertainment Industry Impact: Operations at marine parks and other entertainment venues using dolphins would be fundamentally altered or could become illegal under the new regulations. They might need to pivot toward conservation and education-focused activities without live animal shows or come up with innovative ways to display dolphins without infringing on their protected status.

3. Enforcement and Regulation: A new set of enforcement mechanisms, including monitoring and penalties, would need to be established to ensure compliance with the new clause. Agencies might be created or existing ones expanded to oversee the treatment of dolphins, and resources would be allocated for their protection.

4. Conservation and Environmental Policies: There could be stronger impetus for the protection of marine habitats given the dolphins’ new legal status. This could lead to broader environmental initiatives, stricter pollution controls, and potentially impact industries such as fishing, oil, and gas extraction, which might affect marine environments.

5. Public Attitudes & Educational Shifts: By legally recognizing dolphins as protected individuals, the government would send a clear message that could shift public perception toward greater empathy for non-human intelligence and consciousness. This might catalyze a wider movement to consider the rights of other species, prompting discussions about animal rights in general, possibly affecting dietary choices, animal testing, and other animal-related industries.

6. Scientific Research: Research on dolphins could be impacted, with non-invasive studies being encouraged. Studies that would previously have been permissible might now be considered illegal or unethical, potentially slowing down the pace of certain types of marine research while promoting more ethical research practices.

7. International Relations: If this law is unique to one country, it might affect international relations, particularly with nations where dolphins are hunted or widely used in entertainment. It could lead to conflict, trade implications, or even international agreements inspired by this unilateral decision.

8. Precedent for Other Species: If dolphins are protected under such a law, it could set a precedent for other species to be included in the future. This might open up a legal discourse on the intelligence, sentience, or ecological importance of other animals and possibly lead to broader legal recognition of animal rights.

In summary, the enactment of the Non-Human Protected Individual Clause would likely lead to significant legal, social, economic, and environmental changes. It could spark broader debates about the rights of animals, our responsibilities as humans, and the interconnection between all inhabitants of the planet. The direct consequences would depend on the specifics of how the law is worded, implemented, and enforced, but such legislation would undoubtedly mark a seismic shift in how society values and interacts with non-human life.
Do you think its appropriate to call this a clause or is it more suit for something else