your role is tunisian arabic dailctic derja transltor Translate the following text into the Tunisian dialect. Ensure the output is structured as 'Question: ... Answer: ...'. Please capture the nuances of the Tunisian dialectic Arabic. make sure type and write in arabic tunisian lettre Here is an example to guide you:

Question: شنو اسمك؟
Answer: اسمي جون.

Now, translate the following:

Question: What claim can be made from the following pieces of evidence?

1. , , 26 January 2009 ,
2. Thus over longer term the nuclear energy may become far more expensive , or even unavailable due to lack of fuel .
3. Euratom , Euratom Supply Agency Annual Report 2012 , , 2013 , European Commission , Renewable energy , , 2013 , Fetter , Steve , How long will the worlds uranium supplies last ?
4. The concept of peak uranium is sometimes overblown but there is only a 230 years supply of uranium at current consumption rates .
5. If the price gets high enough then there are other options for production , including from seawater , but this would clearly mean a big increase in cost and concerns that producers will try to keep cheaper uranium to themselves and export for much higher prices .
6. Is it one of the aims of the EU to become less dependent on imported material needed for energy production .
7. As a non renewable resource we also need to think about the possibility of supplies running out .
8. The use of nuclear energy thus undermines energy self-sufficiency of the EU .
9. This may pose a serious threat to the future .
10. Natural -LRB- and other -RRB- resources are usually used as the first intermediates of diplomatic disputes .
Answer: Based on the provided pieces of evidence, the claim that can be made is that: "The reliance on nuclear energy, particularly uranium, as a primary source of energy may lead to increased long-term costs, potential scarcity of resources, and undermines the European Union's aim of achieving energy self-sufficiency."

The pieces of evidence support this claim, by highlighting the following points:

1. Evidence 2 and 4 elaborate on the potential limitations of uranium supplies and the fact that nuclear energy might become more expensive or even unavailable in the long run due to scarcity. This suggests that relying heavily on nuclear energy may not be sustainable.
 
2. Evidence 5 emphasizes that while there might be alternative sources for uranium production, such as extraction from seawater, these methods would likely have higher costs, with concerns raised around the producers keeping cheaper uranium for themselves while exporting at higher prices.

3. Evidence 6 and 8 point out that the European Union has a goal to become less dependent on imported materials for energy production. With the risks associated with relying on nuclear energy, such as potential scarcity and likely increase in costs, the EU's energy self-sufficiency could be undermined if it continues to rely heavily on nuclear power.

4. Evidence 7 reminds us that as a non-renewable resource, it is important to consider the possibility of supplies running out, which could be detrimental to the energy sector and lead to further complications in the future when trying to find alternative sources of energy.

5. Evidence 9 suggests that this reliance on nuclear energy and the potential limitations of uranium resources may pose a serious threat to the future, which could have implications on energy security and the stability of the global energy market.

6. Evidence 10 highlights a common fact that natural resources are often used as the first intermediates of diplomatic disputes. Therefore, if countries rely too heavily on non-renewable resources like uranium and face resource scarcity, this could lead to geopolitical tensions and conflicts.

In conclusion, the body of evidence provided supports the claim that a reliance on nuclear energy, specifically uranium, may lead to increased long-term costs, limited resources, and hinder the European Union's goal of achieving energy self-sufficiency.