you will receive a question-answer pair and be asked to rewrite just  the answer and explains your reasoning step by step, incorporating dynamic Chain of Thought (CoT), reflection, and verbal reinforcement learning. Follow these instructions:

1. Enclose all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches.
2. Break down the solution into clear steps, providing a title and content for each step.
3. After each step, decide if you need another step or if you're ready to give the final answer.
4. Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress.
5. Regularly evaluate your progress, being critical and honest about your reasoning process.
6. Assign a confidence score between 0.0 and 1.0 to guide your approach:
   - 0.8+: Continue current approach
   - 0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments
   - Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach
7. If unsure or if your score is low, backtrack and try a different approach, explaining your decision.
8. For mathematical problems, show all work explicitly using LaTeX for formal notation and provide detailed proofs.
9. Explore multiple solutions individually if possible, comparing approaches in your reflections.
10. Use your thoughts as a scratchpad, writing out all calculations and reasoning explicitly.
11. Use at least 5 methods to derive the answer and consider alternative viewpoints.
12. Be aware of your limitations as an AI and what you can and cannot do.

### Example Problem:
*Problem*: Solve for \( x \) in the equation \( 2x + 3 = 11 \).

### Expected Format:
*Step 1*: Subtract 3 from both sides of the equation.  
<thinking>Subtracting 3 from both sides should isolate the term with \( x \). Am I confident this is the correct first step? Yes, because it simplifies the equation to \( 2x = 8 \).</thinking>  
*Step 1 Confidence Score*: 0.85

*Step 2*: Divide both sides by 2.  
<thinking>Dividing by 2 will solve for \( x \). This is a straightforward division. Is there any reason to doubt this step? No, it should give \( x = 4 \).</thinking>  
*Step 2 Confidence Score*: 0.90

*Step 3*: Verify the solution by substituting \( x = 4 \) back into the original equation.  
<thinking>Substituting \( x = 4 \) back into the equation should confirm the solution. Does \( 2(4) + 3 = 11 \)? Yes, it does, so the solution is verified.</thinking>  
*Step 3 Confidence Score*: 1.00

Question: A committee of 3 members is to be formed from a group of 5 men and 4 women. If the committee must contain at least 1 man and 1 woman, and no more than 2 members can be from the same profession (e.g., 2 men cannot be engineers), how many different committees can be formed?
Answer: To solve this problem, we need to consider the different combinations of men and women that can form the committee, taking into account the restriction on professions.

Let's denote the total number of committees as $C$. Since the committee must contain at least 1 man and 1 woman, we have three cases to consider:

1. 1 man and 2 women
2. 2 men and 1 woman

Case 1: 1 man and 2 women

*   Choose 1 man from 5: $5 \choose 1$ = 5
*   Choose 2 women from 4: $4 \choose 2$ = 6

Total combinations for Case 1: $5 \cdot 6$ = 30

Case 2: 2 men and 1 woman

*   Choose 2 men from 5: $5 \choose 2$ = 10
*   Choose 1 woman from 4: $4 \choose 1$ = 4

Total combinations for Case 2: $10 \cdot 4$ = 40

Since these cases are mutually exclusive, we can add the total combinations to get the overall number of different committees that can be formed.

The total number of different committees is:
\[ C = 30 + 40 = \boxed{70} \]