System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
Use an appropriate format to structure a formal letter of recommendation for a student applying to a prestigious graduate program in computer science.

[Ground truth Answer]
[Your Name]
[Your Title/Position]
[Your Institution/Company]
[Your Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]
[Phone Number]
[Email Address]
[Date]

[Recipient's Name]
[Recipient's Title/Position]
[Graduate Program Name]
[University/Institution Name]
[Address]
[City, State, Zip Code]

Dear [Recipient's Name],

Subject: Recommendation for [Student's Name] for [Graduate Program Name]

I am writing to ardently recommend [Student's Name] for admission to the esteemed [Graduate Program Name] at [University/Institution Name]. As [Your Title/Position] at [Your Institution/Company], I have had the pleasure of working with [Student's Name] for [Number of Years/Months] in the capacity of [your relationship with the student, e.g., their supervisor, professor, mentor, etc.]. 

[Student's Name] has consistently demonstrated exceptional skills and knowledge in computer science during their time at [Student's Institution/Company]. In my [Course/Project Name], [He/She/They] quickly stood out among [his/her/their] peers due to [his/her/their] innate ability to grasp complex concepts, excellent problem-solving skills, and dedication towards continuous learning. 

Throughout the [Course/Project], [Student's Name] accomplished [specific achievements, e.g., top grades, published paper, a software solution etc.]. This accomplishment not only highlights [his/her/their] academic prowess but also [his/her/their] determination to make a significant contribution to the field of computer science. [Student's Name] has also displayed remarkable interpersonal skills, often working efficiently in teams and communicating effectively with colleagues.

Additionally, [Student's Name] has gained valuable practical experience as an active participant in several extracurricular activities, including [clubs, competitions, hackathons, internships, etc.]. [He/She/They] has a strong foundation in computer science principles and an adept understanding of cutting-edge technologies, such as [programming languages, frameworks, machine learning, data analytics, etc.], making [him/her/them] a well-rounded candidate for your graduate program.

I am confident that [Student's Name] will bring valuable insights, innovative ideas, and a strong work ethic to the [Graduate Program Name]. [He/She/They] is genuinely passionate about pursuing a career in computer science, and I believe that enrolling in your prestigious program will provide [him/her/them] with the resources, knowledge, and opportunities needed for [his/her/their] future success. 

Please do not hesitate to contact me if you need further information or if I can provide additional insights into [Student's Name]'s qualifications. Thank you for considering [his/her/their] application.

Sincerely,

[Your Name]
[Your Title/Position]
[Your Institution/Company]

[Assistant's Response]
[Your Name]  
[Your Title/Position]  
[Your Institution/Organization]  
[Your Address]  
[City, State, Zip Code]  
[Email Address]  
[Phone Number]  
[Date]  

[Recipient's Name]  
[Recipient's Title]  
[Recipient's Institution/Organization]  
[Recipient's Address]  
[City, State, Zip Code]  

Dear [Recipient's Name],  

I am writing to express my strong recommendation for [Student's Name] as they seek admission to the [specific program name] at [University Name]. I have had the privilege of serving as [Student's Name]'s [your relationship to the student, e.g., professor, advisor, etc.] at [Your Institution], where I have observed their remarkable growth and dedication to the field of computer science over the past [duration of time].

In my [specific course or project], [Student's Name] consistently demonstrated an outstanding ability to understand and apply complex concepts. For example, during a challenging project on [specific topic], they developed an innovative solution that not only met but exceeded the project requirements. This achievement highlighted their technical acumen and their capacity for critical thinking and creative problem-solving.

Beyond their academic prowess, [Student's Name] has actively participated in [mention any relevant extracurricular activities, research projects, internships, or leadership roles]. Their involvement in [specific activity or project] was particularly impressive, where they [describe the student’s contributions and impact]. This experience has honed their skills in teamwork, leadership, and communication, all of which are essential for success in a demanding graduate program.

[Student's Name] is a person of integrity and character, consistently demonstrating a commitment to [mention any relevant values or ethics, such as collaboration, diversity, or community service]. I am confident that these qualities, combined with their academic abilities, will make them a valuable asset to your program and the broader academic community.

In conclusion, I wholeheartedly endorse [Student's Name] for the [specific program name] at [University Name]. I am certain that they will excel in their studies and make significant contributions to the field of computer science. Should you require any further information or have additional questions, please feel free to contact me.

Thank you for considering this exceptional candidate.

Sincerely,  

[Your Name]  
[Your Title/Position]  
[Your Institution/Organization]  
[Your Signature (if sending a hard copy)]

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: