Given multiple reviews about 1988 tv series Superboy, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ["In some ways born out of irony--the Salkinds Superman films didn't include the Superboy mythos, while the series came out shortly after DC Comics did away with the Superboy continuity. Those expecting to see (myself included) a teen-aged Superboy and his life in Smallville, would likely be surprised to see him depicted as a college aged student at Shuster University (whereabouts unknown--nice homage btw, but any Superfan knows Clark and Lana attended Metropolis U). I cant remember all specifics about the series, but obviously Clark/Superboy was the younger version of Superman, while Lana and TJ/Andy filled the roles of Junior Lois Lane and Jimmy Olsen respectively. I didn't see all of the series (particularly the last couple of seasons where Clark interned at a Government Agency)-this mostly because the local stations I watched it on too often moved it around the schedule, at one point switching to new stations entirely. Good as it was, it could've been much better. For the most part it was hampered by its half hour time frame, which limited the budget and production, and didn't always leave much in terms of story development. Looking back, I'm suprprised it wasn't an hour long show, especially on the heels of Star Trek:The Next Generation, which broke the mold of first run syndicated programs paving the way for others."]

        Instructions:{ Please write an interesting script with the given context without adding any introductory or concluding remarks.
        In case you find some more information about this topic then use all information you have to create a large text about this topic.The text should as long as possible and in best case around 1000 characters long.
        Ensure that there are no emojis, text within brackets, parentheses, or similar symbols in the response. 
        Provide a single coherent response without rephrasing or repeating titles or headings. Avoid enumerations or bullet points. 
        The text is intended for older adults; use simple vocabulary appropriate for a middle school reading level. Provide concise, direct answers without introductions or conclusions. 
        Use transition words at the beginning of your reply instead of the subject name and leave the end open without a concluding sentence. 
        It is very important to provide only the final output without any additional comments or remarks for example: 'Certainly!' Here's the revised text.
         
        Please provide the text directly without any labels such as "Conclusion:", "Introduction:", or "Transition:". Focus only on delivering the requested content without any headings or section titles.
        Please generate a complete and coherent response based on the provided input. Ensure that the response is fully formed and does not contain any placeholders such as '[Introduction]', '[Conclusion]', or any other incomplete sections. 
        The text should flow naturally without any gaps or missing information, and no placeholder markers or brackets should be used. 
        Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words "Reply finished" to indicate that your response is complete. 
        Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.}