You are a JSON assistant. You only reply in valid JSON and never in normal text. Provide a difficulty rating for the video information below. I want a single property named "result" containing a float value ranging from 0 to 1. The following are the categories for the difficulty ratings: 
0.0 - Complete Beginner: The material features very basic vocabulary and simple phrases, supported by clear visuals and context, ideal for someone with no knowledge of the target language. 
0.3 - Beginner: Basic sentences and frequently used vocabulary. The video may offer some visual support and context to aid comprehension. 
0.5 - Intermediate: More intricate sentences with a wider range of vocabulary. Some idiomatic expressions might be present, requiring additional background understanding. 
0.6 - Upper Intermediate: The content contains specialized vocabulary and concepts specific to certain fields. Viewers should be reasonably proficient in the target language for complete comprehension. 
0.8 - Advanced: The video employs sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence constructions, possibly including nuanced conversations that require a strong language mastery. 
1 - Very Advanced: The content targets fluent speakers, featuring specialized terms and concepts that may not be known to all native speakers.
 Description: 
Caption: (EBS In-house Notice)
([Ethics] will be added to
EBS Trainee's Monthly Evaluation)
(The two birds are summoned urgently)
Do you know anything?
But then, what's ethics?
(They clearly need to learn it)
I don't know the dictionary definition
[Staff] There's a common controversy
in ethics...
called the Trolley Problem
(I know, I know)
"Trolley Problem?" I know what that is
I've learned it
Let me explain
(Doesn't know ethics, but knows the Trolley
Problem) Okay, focus over here
- (Go ahead) Okay
- Over here
There's something like a train or a tram
Is it a train or a tram?
[Ddolbi] I'm sorry, but this is an ethics
class, why does that matter?
Be it a train or a tram,
something is racing here
(A train?)
It's a train
But then, it goes this way, the car
So, is there a train and a car coming?
Or is it just the train that's coming?
I'm not the teacher!
(Genuine anger from deep inside)
How can I make that clear?
It's just...
(Refuses to learn)
You're a terrible teacher
(Refuses to communicate)
Oh, just call the teacher
(The teacher to take care
of the two birds is here)
Hello
- Hello
- Hello
(Fascinated)
I'm <PRESIDIO_ANONYMIZED_PERSON>
(Star instructor in social studies) I'm
Mr. Lim, with passion for social studies
(What's NCT?)
(Top tier instructor in social studies)
(Passionate trainer)
(In charge of the Bird Brain Clinic's
ethics subject)
Initially, I was supposed to listen
to your discussion
(What he imagined: a heated debate)
on the Trolley Problem
[Lim Jeonghwan] And I should've entered
knowing what is on your minds
(Unreadable, blank eyes)
But I have no idea what you're thinking
So, let me explain
- Something's racing on the railroad track
- Yes
- But then, people are tied to the track
- Oh, my!
On one side, there are five people,
and on the other side, there's one
(Focused)
The railroad track divides like this
(Trolley Problem)
There's a person who has to decide
which way to go
And this person only has two options
(Save five people vs. One person)
Send the train up or down
And the person won't be held accountable
regardless of the decision
So, the two of you should've had a debate
(Initial debate topic)
on which is more right
(But the debate couldn't even start)
Aha
Why must I be under
such a huge responsibility?
(Mr. Lim grits his teeth)
I have no right to decide
(Unable to understand)
someone else's life
(Refuting)
Then, everyone will die
(Suddenly starts debating)
This is how a debate begins
- Pengsoo, let me ask you a question
- Okay
Let's say that I'm on the first track
And there's an unknown bird
on the second track
Let's answer together
on the count of three
No...
I actually hope that will never happen
(Crying)
[Jeonghwan] But it can happen
(Feels weak-hearted to see the pigeon's
tears) Goodness, you're crying
Goodness me, goodness me
(Ddolbi's tears are unstoppable)
Hey, wipe your tears
Why... Why must that situation come?
Don't cry
Pengsoo!
(They're not debating...)
Let's survive together!
(LOL)
Yeah! We'll survive!
(Basically filming a movie)
Although we have a short lifespan...
- No
- Why?
I'm going to live a long life...
Let me give you a slight hint
(Ddolbi thinks Pengsoo is (Right/ Nice))
Is Pengsoo right or nice?
(Nice)
I think Pengsoo is nice
But then, is Pengsoo usually right?
Pengsoo isn't right because...
(Telling tales)
Pengsoo is very condescending
(A boomer)
and is a boomer
- Then why is Pengsoo nice?
- No! This has to be filmed on camera!
(Dumbfounded)
I went downstairs
for a split second, and Pengsoo asked,
"Do you know what time it is now?"
(Gen MZ pigeon getting at the boomer)
"Aren't you going to visit to say hello?"
(EBS etiquette learned from senior members)
Please release this footage
(That is all)
It's only ethically correct to do so
- (Don't fight) Hey, hey, hey!
- What?
(But anyway, Pengsoo is nice)
Pengsoo is nice
(Two ethical perspectives on right and
wrong) There are two essential perspectives
when we talk about ethics,
and one of them
is the deontological perspective
Deontology
(Never heard of it before) And then...
This one's tricky, but I'll explain
The other is utilitarianism
- Utilitarianism?
- [Jeonghwan] Yes
(Difference?)
What's the difference between you and me?
- You're human, and we're animals
- [Jeonghwan] That's right
Species
Then, what's the difference between
a human and a bird?
The two of us
are a little cute!
(Cute animals)
Yes, and...
(And just a human)
- That's right, and we sing well
- We're like canaries
(Bird Brain Clinic Music Class?)
You can say that in a music class
I'm capable of thinking
Animals don't have such abilities
- Oh, my
- Why not?
They don't
- Oh, my?
- What?
What are you talking about?
(The animals are furious)
That's right, you're rude!
I thought really long and hard
about whether I should say this
(Blame him)
But the person who claimed this said so
(Deontology)
Who?
A man named Kant was a famous
philosopher in Germany
(Requests to see Kant)
We need to see him
Yes, I'll go and see him
Me, too
Well... So...
(Immanuel Kant (1724-1804))
He passed away
There's something common
between the three of us
Something common between
animals and humans
We eat, sleep, and excrete
(Correct!)
That's right
And we love
What?
(Everyone is confused)
What?
Isn't office romance forbidden?
(Making a fuss)
I'm sorry,
- but Pengsoo isn't my type
- [Jeonghwan] Okay
(0 Confession, 1 Rejection)
Okay, okay, okay
Humans and animals have
an instinctive realm
The philosophers who focused more
on this aspect were
(Utilitarianism)
these people
(The key point summary)
Then, if I summarize what I've said so far,
(Deontology, e.g., Kant)
humans use reasoning
to set the principles
for what's right and wrong
And believe they must be abided
What's important here is
that they don't consider the results
(Seems to understand it in one go)
This is what they consider to be ethical
(Utilitarianism, e.g., Bentham)
Utilitarianism is this
Humans and animals
all have emotions
Eventually, utilitarianism claims
that right and wrong are determined
by how much more beneficial
the result is to me
(That's what utilitarianism was...)
Those are the ideas in ethics
(The foundation for ethics is...)
And the basis of ethics
is philosophy, which is related to thinking
[Staff] Why don't we have a debate?
Are we that unreliable?
Yes!
(Time to check their qualification)
Let's see if you're qualified to debate
Yes, sir!
The results change depending
on the conditions and situations
What is this?
- Utilitarianism
- That's right
It was utilitarianism
- [Jeonghwan] Great
- (Pengsoo answers immediately) Way to go!
Since it's acting out of obligation itself,
doing so itself is good,
so I'll force myself to act
according to my obligation
What's this?
- Deontology
- That's deontology, that's right
Oh, what a bright bird!
You're a brilliant bird!
That's the key
So, have this in mind
(The pin-point summary is complete)
Then, we're ready to debate
(Bird Brain Debate)
(1. Debate under one topic)
Now, let's begin the debate
(2. SNU interns to help Pengsoo and Ddolbi)
Do you know each other?
(SNU students)
We're alums
(Ddolbi and intern Jaeyeon are a team)
(Pengsoo and intern Hyeonjun are a team)
(3. Choose Deontological or Utilitarian
views randomly)
(4. Have a heated debate)
We must live with obligation!
(The first topic for the debate?)
Which topic shall we debate on?
- I have one in mind
- What is it?
The Perilla Leaf Controversy
is hot these days
(First topic)
(When my friend is struggling to eat
a pickled perilla leaf)
(Is it okay vs. not okay)
(for my boyfriend/girlfriend to help out?)
(The stance will be random)
Deontology
- This is ours
- (=Based on results) Utilitarianism!
(Utilitarianism) (Deontology)
From a deontological perspective...
In the end, we can all dine swiftly
(Scratch)
But ethically,
we're obliged to distance ourselves
from others of the opposite sex
(Bird brains in full operation)
Oh, that's how you approach it
That's right
By helping out
(Last-minute preparation for the debate)
So, is it tolerable or not?
It's intolerable
Okay, go first
For everyone to enjoy, uh...
A happy meal, helping with the
perilla leaf, should be tolerable
(The deontologist refutes)
We're against it
Fundamentally, couples love each other
(The act of breaching the duty between
a couple) Yes, it can be of good intention,
(Do not help with the perilla leaf!) but
it's unnecessary if you have a girlfriend
But he didn't have other intentions!
(For quick dining)
He just helped with the perilla leaf
The chopsticks touched, though
Is that a crime?
(A short recess)
Let's stop here, then...
(Summarizing both teams' arguments)
What's your conclusion?
We're against helping
We're for helping
Why is eating fast the standard
of one's happiness?
Who is that happiness for?
Someone could feel unfortunate
and unhappy about it
But in conclusion, isn't it best
to finish the meal quickly?
(By helping with the perilla leaf)
We need to eat quickly
(Everyone can eat swiftly and happily)
and return to the office
Why are you creating a situation?
- We're having dinner, right?
- That's right
What is the happiness in this situation?
(Eating fast)
Eating swiftly and enjoying the meal
(Harms no one in the end)
is the greatest happiness during dinner
I object
For a long time,
our ancestors have told us
to chew carefully and slowly
- (On the verge of sidetracking) Your Honor
- Deontology, you're deontologists
- Deontology, deontology
- They're so...
Not a theory on food, but deontology!
Not a theory on dining, but deontology
- (Sorry, I was hungry) That's right!
- [Jeonghwan] Not on food
- [Jaeyeon] That's right, that's right
- [Jeonghwan] Okay?
A couple has ethical obligations
to each other
(Impure intention) Is it okay to pay
attention to someone else?
During the meal, the friend goes...
(Flip, stir)
"Why isn't this working?"
(Who am I... Where am I...)
It's unnecessary if you have a girlfriend
- (Refuting immediately) I object
- Go ahead
Pengsoo stirred a lot just now, right?
(The ten-year-old needs to learn table
manners) To choose the perilla leaf
I didn't stir it
You did!
- (Telling tales) Even went in the mouth
- The other person stirred it
[Jaeyeon] Right?
I played two roles
- How disgusting is that?
- That's right
(Disgusting?)
Regardless of helping out or not,
what we must focus on is this!
What kind of issues will occur
from helping with the perilla leaf?
So, I'm saying that by helping,
it could lead to undesirable results
And that's utilitarianism
(Has gone off track)
We won
We won, we won
(The teacher's counterattack)
Let me ask
The other person is also a human
Then, you have the obligation
(=Deontology)
to be kind to other humans
That's right
That's our teammate, right there!
(Attacking deontology)
(One must be kind to all other humans)
(However, what if the other party is also
a human?) How will you explain that?
(Trying to defend the stance)
You can do it yourself, so why...
(Excited, spotting the prey)
You should've noticed first and helped out
- In that case...
- Don't get so excited
because I'll ask you, too
But we have you on our team,
and you're super reliable!
We are a team!
(Confident)
This is a competition!
Kant said
that all human beings are equal
They're not!
(Deontology)
You're a deontologist
So, you must accept it if Kant said so
I'll re-write deontology
You'll meddle with Kant?
Oh, my!
In philosophy?
(I'd rather not look)
Can't I?
(Here's the attack on utilitarianism)
You said earlier,
(Eating quickly is everyone's happiness)
"Eat quickly and leave"
That's right
(Getting ready to act)
But what you're insisting on right now
(Attacking utilitarianism) is that everyone
will be happy with that decision
But that's only good for you
(Hurt)
You sound really cold
"Good for you"
(The pigeon is hurt)
You should say, "For Ddolbi"
"For you?"
(Suddenly in "100 Minute Debate" mood)
I thought we were in "100 minute Debate"
(Calming the bird down)
Okay, okay
(Weak mentality)
Don't hurt my feelings,
Your Honor
So, I'm suggesting we should think about it
There isn't just one deontologist
or utilitarian
(There are various scholars for each
theory) It's not just Kant and Bentham
So both teams did a good job just now
(The winner of the "Perilla Leaf"
Controversy?) The winner for now...
- We should do the second debate first
- Sounds great
- Let's move on to the next topic
- You're doing a great job
(The next topic of Bird Brain Debate?)
You're doing a fantastic job
(Second topic)
(My close friend A has been married
for N years)
(Casually walking on the streets, you
witness A's husband having an affair)
(In this situation,
I will tell vs. not tell)
(my friend A about this)
- You need to tell him
- This one's tricky
(A situation you can see on TV)
(Initially)
Oh, but you need to tell him about it
I'd also tell him!
Come on out!
- Goodness me!
- It's utilitarianism
- Nice, nice, nice
- Deontology
(Deontology) (Utilitarianism)
Okay, we've switched
Then, where should we start?
I believe that it should be told
- That's right
- But we rely on the results
It's only right to tell the truth
to the other person
Okay, the second topic
is that you've witnessed
a friend's partner having an affair
Should you tell your friend
about this or not?
Should you tell your friend
about this or not?
(Utilitarianism) Here, we have
utilitarians who focus on the results
(Deontology)
And here, we have deontologists
You go ahead first!
Great!
(LOL)
It's only right!
To tell your friend about it, because!
Isn't that the only option
if it's your close friend?
And how selfish is that?
What?
Deontologists are so selfish!
Okay, look!
Because of the belief that you must
force the truth
and your obligation to know the truth,
revealing the ugly truth can put someone
(It would've never happened if untold!)
into agony
Can you take responsibility for this?
However!
Paying no heed to it is just...
Why? Huh? Uh, why?
What are you doing right now?
(Back to sidetracking)
Did you just pay no heed to it?
- We really need to get this sorted
- What's that?
You asked me to be here
to sort things out, right?
(Yes... That's right... - Staff)
Yes, that was very neat
- Let me clear things up
- Yes
- It's ethically right to keep it a secret
- That's right
- It's ethically right to reveal the truth
- That's right
- So, all you have to do is explain why!
- Exactly, why?
So...
You must tell the truth
It's better to be in pain earlier
than finding out about it after
having two or three kids...
- (Lost again) Or even four or five...
- No, no, no
- Deontology, deontology, deontology
- Was I wrong?
Jaeyeon
(Tossing the argument)
But still, spilling the beans to Hyeonjun,
and making him face the truth
later on, such...
- (Tossing) You take it from there
- Take what?
- Continue from "Such..."
- I did it up till here
So...
Uh...
We're the worst team
What's wrong with us?
- Let's distance ourselves
- Oh, just!
(The teacher steps up)
No, look, the answer is straightforward
(Deontologist's perspective)
To not lie
Is it conditional or unconditional?
- It's unconditional
- Unconditional
Do you consider the results or not?
- I don't
- You don't
(Make this into a sentence)
Finish this as a sentence
It's unconditional to lie
(I lost)
(A bird brain that even brings
the teacher to his knees)
(A chaotic debate)
I mean, I'm not telling you...
(Our team is doomed...)
To group what I said
(Summary of the deontologists)
So, we regard lying
as something we must not do
as a human being
That's right
What should be said or unsaid
doesn't depend on what it is
Truth itself has the value to be told
So, it's a universal and valid duty
for a human being
to speak the truth without lying
This is their argument
- That's right
- And over here?
Ignorance is bliss!
(Ignorance is bliss, for everyone's sake)
What do you think?
What was that?
They said "Ignorance is bliss"
Of course, knowledge is bliss!
Isn't it "Knowledge is power?"
So you're saying that
the result of hiding it
is better than revealing it, right?
- Right
- Right?
There is no absolute argument
Every argument is valid in its own way
But giving reasons to them is important
You need to give reasons
instead of just speaking with feelings
We did a good job of giving our reasons,
but they didn't!
Oh, my! What was your reason?
(Refuting over the reasons)
Don't go ruining other families
with your own standards
The household of a person having an affair
is bound to fall apart
That's utilitarian
Didn't you just approach the idea
with utilitarianism?
Wow! Pengsoo has learned a lot!
- That was super sharp
- I need to give Pengsoo a point
(Winning point: Refuted the argument)
Pengsoo understood well just now
- That's right
- Pengsoo pointed things out
The winner of this round is Pengsoo
- Winner!
- Let's give them a round of applause
I won, but I don't feel too good about it
(Bird Brain Debate)
(Ddolbi/Jaeyeon 0: 1 Pengsoo/Hyeonjun)
[Staff] Can we debate on one last topic?
(Third topic)
(If Pengsoo becomes a zombie,)
(will you disclose vs. hide it?)
This one's tricky
(If Pengsoo becomes a zombie,
will you disclose vs. hide it?)
Deontology
(Utilitarianism)
Utilitarianism
It switched again
(Utilitarianism) (Deontology)
Okay, let's go
Then, who wants to go first?
- Us!
- Team Ddolbi? Okay
We'll hide it
Why?
If we tell the truth,
Pengsoo will be the only one to die
But if Pengsoo dies, all of us
will die deep inside
because we'd lose our happiness
(What? This is touching...)
Can't we just lock Pengsoo up in a cage?
(You're so...)
- [Jaeyeon] Well done
- Then, Team Pengsoo?
We'll tell people about it
Because the zombie virus is contagious
and zombies are dangerous
And because zombies are dangerous,
we have an obligation
(Zombies are dangerous)
to inform others about it
(Surprised)
No matter how much we love Pengsoo,
and even if I am Pengsoo,
I think I'd tell people about it
But you sound so cool
How will you tell them?
The fact that I've become a zombie...
(Notices it sounds strange)
- Admiral Yi Sunshin said not to say it
- He tells you not to talk about it
Let's pretend I never said this
Then, what do you think
about Pengsoo's position?
If we report on Pengsoo,
Pengsoo could die immediately
(I could die immediately?)
However,
we could wait till there's a vaccine
We can wait!
We can save Pengsoo with the vaccine
and wait for those who love Pengsoo
to become happier
With Pengsoo locked up in a cage?
(A subsequent refutation)
But it's necessary to inform people
Oh!
People have the right to know!
My beloved Peng Club has the right
to know this
(Wow)
No matter how painful it will be
after finding out about it,
(Reality is unchangeable)
we can't change the reality
We're not trying to hide the truth
- We're postponing it for everyone
- That's right
Where are you going to lock
Pengsoo up, then?
We'll lock Pengsoo up in Ddolbi's house
(Blatantly refuses)
Ugh, no
My house is too small!
(Change of attitude)
Actually, that's even better
Lock Pengsoo up in a birdcage!
(Then, what about "Giant Peng TV?")
Then, Pengsoo can't shoot videos
No, zombie content is entertaining, too
(Giant Peng TV "Pengsoo Becomes a Zombie"
episode)
Like this
So, you'll lock Pengsoo up
and continue to film?
Yes!
(Diverse plans for zombie content)
Zombie content will be pretty fun, too
Then, people are bound to find out
that I'm a zombie!
You're right
We won't say that you've turned
into a zombie
- We'll just say that you're acting
- That's right!
So, I won't say a word and go...
Ow, wow, argh
Ahhh
(Now that's some spectacular
zombie acting...!)
But isn't that what you're doing now
as well?
Pardon?
(Just kidding)
Nothing
I think Team Ddolbi
did better with this topic
(Team Ddolbi (=Utilitarianism) wins)
(Bird Brain Debate)
(Ddolbi/Jaeyeon 1:1 Pengsoo/Hyeonjun)
(Tie)
Why are utilitarianism
and Kant's deontology,
which Pengsoo and Ddolbi
debated today, important?
These days, we make many judgments
based on the results
So, it would've been very challenging
to argue with deontology
However, the results are also important!
- Yes
- Right?
So, I hope you look at things
from an ethical point of view
And become able to deliver
your perspective
(Extremely emotional birds)
with grounds and reason
instead of just feelings
(The end of today's ethics class)
Thank you!
[Staff] If our birds were to learn
a new subject,
what would you like to recommend?
We've studied math already!
- Oh, is that so?
- (Math and ethics was tough) Yes
Then, I'd like the two to learn...
(Physics)
Some physics
(Physics after ethics?)
Because
I think they should learn
the logic of things
(Nodding soullessly)
You've learned ethics,
the human duty, right?
Oh, right
Then, let's learn the logic of things
(Given up)
Let's go to physics!
Argh!
((Wanted) We're looking for a physics
teacher for these birds...)
Next episode
Title: 바람피우는 상황 알린다? 숨긴다? 새대가리들의 대환장 토론🐧💬(feat. NCT가 뭐야 선생님)