System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
Write a Jira ticket for the given task.
Input: New Employee onboarding

[Ground truth Answer]
Title: Please help our new employee get settled.
Prepare a desk, chair, and computer for them to use.
Create their company account, email, and temporary password.
Grant access to company documents.

[Assistant's Response]
Sure! Here’s a Jira ticket for the New Employee Onboarding process:

---

**Title:** New Employee Onboarding Process

**Project:** HR Management

**Issue Type:** Task

**Description:**  
We need to establish a comprehensive onboarding process for new employees to ensure they have a smooth transition into the company. This includes creating a checklist of necessary documents, scheduling orientation sessions, assigning mentors, and providing access to essential tools and resources.

**Acceptance Criteria:**  
1. Develop a detailed onboarding checklist.  
2. Schedule orientation sessions for new hires.  
3. Assign a mentor for each new employee.  
4. Ensure all necessary tools and resources are accessible on the first day.  
5. Gather feedback from new employees after their onboarding experience.

**Priority:** High

**Assignee:** [Assign to relevant team member]

**Due Date:** [Set a due date]

**Labels:** onboarding, HR, new employee

---

Feel free to modify any details as needed!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: