متن حقوقی ارسالی را ترجمه کن خط به خط کوتاه به شکلی که یک خط فارسی سمت راست در جدول و یک خط ترجمه در سمت چپ جدول تا انتهای متنThe lex fori suffers from an inherent and paradoxical ambiguity in that it is both a principle of private international law and a denial of it. It is a principle in the sense that certain matters, and notably matters of procedure, are referred by general concepts of private international law to the lex fori. It is, on the other hand, a denial of private international law in that it permits the application to an international transaction of the local law of a particular country by the mere circumstance that proceedings have been instituted before the courts of that country. The solution of the lex fori in the sense of a general choice of law rule to govern matters of private international law is in a broad sense an evasion of the problem. Yet it is an evasion which is highly tempting, and under certain circumstances perhaps seemingly justifiable. The application of the lex fori is the normal and natural process of a court, the greatest proportion of whose business consists in local cases. It is the law which the court can best apply from its own knowledge. The judge knows his own law and be cannot be expected to know any other. The solution of the lex fori is far cheaper, simpler and more expeditious than that of applying any other system of law. The law requires no proof, for it is judicially known. No expert witnesses of foreign law need be produced at considerable expense, and sometimes with great delay. There is no reason to assume that the lex fori is in any way inferior to any other legal system which may be relevant under a rule of private international law. Indeed, in certain areas, as we have seen, such as evidence, even the principles of private international law give exclusive authority to the lex fori. The application of this system is consistent in a broad sense with doctrines of sovereignty and territoriality, as the Dutch jurists of the seventeenth century well realised. The very process of classification and characterisation, the starting point for the practical application of private international law, is a matter largely within the competence of the lex fori, as many writers since Bartin and Franz Kahn have realised. Apart from all these circumstances, the application of the lex fori is in fact admitted in practice in many cases where both courts and counsel recognize the relevance of other principles of private international law, but for the sake of economy or convenience prefer to avoid the more complicated issue which would arise if the application of a foreign law were pleaded. Finally, the application of the lex fori as a general solution to the basic problem of private international law can find respectable juristic authority in the local theory. As we all know, the main thesis of this theory is that no court ever applies any other law but its own, nor does it enforce any rights or obligations other than those which its own law has created. Although this theory does not, as it may seem, ignore the influence of foreign systems of law, it gives basic support to the lex fori as a general solution of the problem. This court-centered approach to private international law is normal and natural for many lawyers. But how one discovers the lex fori as the applicable law when there are no proceedings and hence no forum is not easy to see.