System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
[Instruction]
Why do people give Reddit Gold to admins?

[Ground truth Answer]
People give Reddit Gold to admins for several reasons:

1. Appreciation: Users may want to express their gratitude and show support for the hard work admins put into maintaining and improving Reddit. Gold awards can be a way of saying "thank you" for their efforts.

2. Acknowledgment: Admins occasionally participate in discussions or provide helpful information to users. By giving gold, users acknowledge the admin's valuable contribution and encourage further engagement.

3. Visibility: When a comment or post receives a gold award, it tends to receive more attention. Awarding gold to an admin response could help increase the visibility of their message, ensuring more users benefit from the information provided.

4. Support Reddit: Giving gold is also a way of supporting Reddit as a platform, as it is a part of their monetization model. Since admins are crucial to the website's functioning, users may want to support both the individual admins and the platform itself.

5. Community-building: Awarding gold helps build a sense of camaraderie within the Reddit community. By giving gold to admins, users are fostering goodwill and enhancing the overall experience for everyone on the platform.

[Assistant's Response]
People give Reddit Gold, now known as Reddit Premium, to admins for several reasons:

1. **Appreciation**: Users may want to show appreciation for a post or comment made by admins that they find particularly insightful, helpful, or entertaining.

2. **Support for Quality Content**: By awarding Gold, users can encourage admins to continue contributing valuable content, thereby enhancing the overall quality of discussions on the platform.

3. **Community Engagement**: Gifting Gold fosters a sense of community by acknowledging and rewarding active participation and contributions from admins.

4. **Celebration of Milestones**: Users might give Gold to celebrate significant achievements or milestones related to admins or the platform itself.

Overall, giving Reddit Gold is a way for users to express gratitude and support within the Reddit community, recognizing the efforts of admins in maintaining and enriching the platform.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: