Given multiple reviews about 1977 movie New York, New York, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['The first thirty minutes is some of the best stuff Scorsese\'s done The first thirty minutes or so of "New York, New York" is some of Scorsese\'s finest work. His loving homage to the musicals of the 1930s, 40s, 50s and even 60s is great. De Niro\'s unique performance as a quick-witted, sleazy war-veteran trying to hit on any woman he can find is classic stuff. After that the whole film sort of deteriorates. Apart from an amusing cameo by the great, underrated actor Dick Miller ("Gremlins," "Terminator") the film starts to become overlong and, frankly, quite boring. It\'s amusing enough for a single viewing but it\'s farm from a great addition to the Scorsese / De Niro collaboration track record. Still, it is one of Scorsese\'s most _different_ films and when was the last time you thought you could say Robert De Niro acted in a musical? 2.5/5 ', "Start spreading the news I never knew that the classic Frank Sinatra, New York, New York song was sung for the very first time in this film by Liza Minnelli. The song was written specially for this movie. It just shows how something recent can become considered as an old standard so quickly! New York, New York is a gritty studio bound musical drama directed by Martin Scorsese. He was coked up at the time and having an affair with Liza Minnelli. This might explain why the film is such a mess with a narrative that is all over the place. The film opens on the night of V-J Day in New York. Jimmy Doyle (De Niro) wearing an Hawaiian shirt goes to a nightclub to hit on a woman, any woman whether she is married, got a boyfriend sitting next to her. It did not matter to him. He relentlessly ask girls he does not know for their telephone numbers. Doyle then sees USO singer Francine Evans (Liza Minnelli) seated at a table alone and pesters her relentlessly. The film has already made its initial mistake. Doyle is a sex pest, a creep, a louse. It gets worse, Doyle goes from hotel to hotel running up debts. He pretends to be an injured soldier. Doyle also is a saxophonist who gets into arguments with promoters and club owners. Yet somehow Francine falls for him and they become an act performing in nightclubs. The film never addresses that Doyle could be bi-polar or is some kind of manic depressive who acts on impulse. Doyle and Francine suddenly get married and they have a volatile, even an abusive relationship. The marriage destructs when Francine becomes pregnant. The film becomes something different in the latter stages, as Francine becomes a hit musical star. In this long segment we see Liza Minnelli perform (or should I say, shout) show tunes that would be at home in those 1940s and 1950s MGM musicals. This includes New York, New York. Well Scorsese certainly gave his own original tribute to the Hollywood musicals of yesteryear. The film is never coherent in narrative and style. In places the film is dull. Most of the supporting characters are never fleshed out or look uneasy in acting roles such as Clarence Clemons. It is a misfire but it's not without interest. There were instances of Scorsese trying to emulate Powell & Pressburger. The biggest problem was making de Niro to be such a psycho jerk. I never bought him once as a saxophone player or someone who could even lead a band. "]

        Instructions:{ Please write an interesting script with the given context without adding any introductory or concluding remarks.
        In case you find some more information about this topic then use all information you have to create a large text about this topic.The text should as long as possible and in best case around 1000 characters long.
        Ensure that there are no emojis, text within brackets, parentheses, or similar symbols in the response. 
        Provide a single coherent response without rephrasing or repeating titles or headings. Avoid enumerations or bullet points. 
        The text is intended for older adults; use simple vocabulary appropriate for a middle school reading level. Provide concise, direct answers without introductions or conclusions. 
        Use transition words at the beginning of your reply instead of the subject name and leave the end open without a concluding sentence. 
        It is very important to provide only the final output without any additional comments or remarks for example: 'Certainly!' Here's the revised text.
         
        Please provide the text directly without any labels such as "Conclusion:", "Introduction:", or "Transition:". Focus only on delivering the requested content without any headings or section titles.
        Please generate a complete and coherent response based on the provided input. Ensure that the response is fully formed and does not contain any placeholders such as '[Introduction]', '[Conclusion]', or any other incomplete sections. 
        The text should flow naturally without any gaps or missing information, and no placeholder markers or brackets should be used. 
        Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words "Reply finished" to indicate that your response is complete. 
        Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.}