write a shorter and more concise rebuttal statement from this statement                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       The pictures in this folder contain pictures that show details
proving that I DID NOT violate the policy where it is stated in Exhibit 18 of the
Respondent's Position Statement that "During the same period of time this ethics investigation
was being conducted the employee made a purchase and violated the policy, this policy is in reference
to mis-priced merchandise." There are no more transactions afterwards because my card was canceled
on the aforementioned date and there are no more purchases on my card especially on this date at the company
in city and I have never had another card reissued to me proving that I didn't make a purchase
on that day. 

Furthermore, the pictures provided show the last transaction on my debit card was on this date (see IMG_9876) (see IMG_5432) and I never
requested another card be reissued to me therefore it completely contradicts the company's blatantly false claim that
I violated the policy and this was just another pretext to illegally and unlawfully terminate me. Whenever any
merchandise is stocked to the shelves in the wrong section with a price underneath it, as per company policy, we have
to honor that price and sell the merchandise to the "customer" for that same price and then we are required to go and
correct the incorrect price afterwards. 

So since I launched an investigation into the discrimination and retaliation perpetrated against me, the company openly "increased
scrutiny" on me which is deemed illegal and retaliatory under the Retaliation section on the EEOC website and by deliberately increasing
surveillance on me while I was "off work" with my wife while she was shopping just like every customer there in the store and she was also shopping at a store that I don't work at which proves that the manager was probably informed that my wife purchased the item at a reduced price in all likelihood by either the manager that I showed the picture of the mispriced merchandise so that she can get an employee to correct the price or the other manager that came and did the price override at the register with my wife while I was away speaking with associates when the transaction occurred.

In conclusion, my debit card that I canceled prior to the purchase date and my card's last four digits was 9876 whereas my wife debit card at that time ended in 5432 which unequivocally proves that I couldn't have purchased the item since I wasn't at the register and didn't have my debit card because it was already canceled 65 days before I was ever informed about the purchase
and if they would have been able to write me up on a real disciplinary action about the purchase in the store in the city then the company wouldn't have waited approximately one month and two
weeks to mention it to me on the date of my termination so their claim is false and my termination was illegal and pretextual and the company sought to hide the real reason why they were terminating me which was because I reported discrimination and retaliation which is a protected activity.