System: You are a JSON assistant. You only reply in valid JSON and never in normal text. Provide a difficulty rating for the video information outlined below. I would like a single "result" value that is a float between 0 and 1. Here are the difficulty score categories:
0.0 - Absolute Beginner: The material features very basic vocabulary and simple phrases, accompanied by clear visuals and context. This is perfect for someone with no knowledge of the target language.
0.3 - Beginner: The content consists of straightforward sentences and familiar vocabulary. It may include some visual support and context to aid comprehension.
0.5 - Intermediate: This level presents more intricate sentences and a wider range of vocabulary. Some idiomatic phrases might be included, necessitating a bit more prior knowledge.
0.6 - Upper Intermediate: The material incorporates specialized vocabulary and concepts relevant to specific fields. Viewers should have a solid understanding of the target language to fully grasp the content.
0.8 - Advanced: The video employs sophisticated vocabulary and complex sentence structures. It may feature nuanced discussions that require a strong proficiency in the language.
1 - Very Advanced: The content is designed for fluent speakers, containing specialized terms and concepts that may not be well-known even to all native speakers.
User: Descripcin: And if I tell you that there
 is the possibility of being happy?
And for that, you would only 
have to speak one language.
Well, perhaps, I would be lying to you,
but to find out you will have
 to stay until the end of the video.
The idea is real, now, whether
 you are going to be happy or not...
we would get into philosophical questions...
do you believe that happiness really exists?
Are you happy?
Hello, good afternoon.
Well, someone invented
 this language of happiness.
Is it Esperanto?
Today we are going to talk
 about artificial languages.
This is super fashionable,
although now they are preferred 
to be called 'conlangs'
(from 'constructed languages').
Well, in the 18th century
 the solresol was invented...
Oh...
But, let's see, before talking 
about this one, about others that remain
and about the language of happiness,
I remind you that you have languages 
​​that are not very practical artificial,
such as English, German, French or Spanish,
and that you can study at Lingoda!
Who sponsored today's video.
Lingoda is a wonderful platform
for getting serious about learning a language.
Do you want to learn one of these
 four languages ​​that I have told you about?
Well sign up for a “Sprint” or a “Super Sprint”.
Depending on the time you have, 
you can do one or the other
and if you don't miss any class, 
it can be completely free
or half price.
I tell you all this in more detail 
at the end of the video.
But you can click on the link in the description
and leave it saved in another tab.
And if I tell you that this thing about 
creating languages ​​is something very, very old?
In the twelfth century
 Saint Hildegard of Bingen,
Doctor of the Catholic Church, 
writer, philosopher, intellectual,
and a goat in general,
created the lingua ignota.
[Dorotea] 
And why did you create it?
Well, it is still a mystery today,
but one of the theories is that it had mystical purposes.
It has even been thought that 
it was a simplification of Latin.
Here's an example:
(I'll leave it in the video description)
It was also related to a Romance language
 that existed in the Moselle valley
(die Mosel, in southern Germany,
it must sound familiar to you because
 the white wines of this region they are very good)
and this lady was in that area
in the last years of proven existence of this language
(although, let's see, it is most likely that
 she was in that area for the wine
and not for the language).
Then, in the 17th century,
 Descartes theorized about a language
(I have not found any examples,
but it is known that it was logical
 and philosophical in nature)
and then, in the 18th century, 
the solresol was invented…
Oh…
(A language based on notes musicals).
The language was only made up
 of these seven syllables
and also had its own spelling.
But not only that,
 but it could also be sung or played
with an instrument like I have done.
The very name of the language “solresol”
can be written or done simply this
and it means 'language'.
Writing this or saying “misisoldo”, 
means 'experience'
or writing this, doing
or saying simply “reresi”, 
means 'December'.
Then another was invented in the 19th century,
when Latin was already 
almost a memory of the past,
the idea of ​​a new international 
language emerged with force.
The first attempt to create a language
 based on languages ​​that already existed
was Volapük,
this language was based
 on English and German.
It was invented by a German priest in 1879,
and at first it was quite successful.
What's more, it is believed that 
at its best it had 100,000 speakers.
The problem is that its grammar was a bit complicated
and then, in addition, its community
 of speakers got into polemics
and disputes about the language.
And then Esperanto arrived
 and its popularity was destroyed.
[Dorotea] 
Could you give an example, right?
Well, let's see, "I give you two books"
 in volapük is "givob ole bukis tel.
Here we can clearly see the influence
 of English and German:
givob, in German is the verb 'geben'
and in English, the verb 'to give';
and the word 'bukis', that is,
 'books', in German is “Bücher”
and in English “books”.
And then came the big winner:
Esperanto.
Which, by the way, 'esperanto' in Esperanto 
means “the one who waits”.
And I have called it a winner 
not only because its number of speakers
adds up to more than that 
of the other languages ​​built together,
but also because it has even
 had native speakers.
You currently have them, wow.
And not only that, but it has
 developed regional variations.
Does that mean that it is still an artificial language?
Is Esperanto more artificial 
than the standard of any language?
Why?
Is the RAE, when it makes a selection 
of traits that it likes or dislikes,
is it not also building
 a language that is not real?
Are the different standards 
of natural languages ​​artificial constructions?
These are some very interesting questions
 that we are going to see in different videos:
what does the RAE do 
(which has already been done and published),
Esperanto
and, my favorite:
a video in which I am going to create my own language
(a language for PEDANTS ).
[Dorotea] 
Okay, but let's go now, please,
 to the language of happiness, I need it.
There is no movie or fantasy world
that does not present us with a novel way of speaking.
There are prestigious linguists, in fact,
who have dedicated themselves to it
 for different film and television works.
There are even books to create it step by step.
Surely you have heard of Navi,
Valyrian,
we also have Parseltongue
or those from a slightly worse saga...
Sorry... Quenya and Sindarin,
Tolkien's two most famous languages,
in The Lord of the Rings...
[Dorotea] 
Everyone knew what saga it was…
Well, okay.
Well, all these languages ​​were created
 by and for literary works,
and for this reason they are considered
 artistic artificial languages,
because, let's see, not all 
constructed languages ​​are the same.
They can be divided
 into three large groups:
artistic, communicative and philosophical.
But they can also be languages
 ​​a priori and a posteriori.
The a priori are not based 
on the vocabulary of natural languages
​​(let's see, I understand it as languages
 ​​that go a priori, that
is, at the beginning, 
before a language develops
and, then, they do not allow themselves 
to be influenced by the vocabulary of none.
However, the a posteriori ones leave
 after any language has been created
and they do allow themselves to be influenced by it.
[Dorotea] 
It seems to me a very bad analogy...
Well, it will have helped someone...
Quenya and Sindarin are two languages
 ​​a priori, for example,
but, see, this does not mean that Tolkien
did not take inspiration from real languages.
He acknowledged using two
 of his favorite languages ​​as inspiration
to create his two most developed languages.
Finnish influenced more in Quenya,
while Welsh influenced Sindarin more.
[Dorotea]
 But aren't these “art” languages, like Sindarin,
[Dorotea] considered on the same level as Esperanto?
Let's see, they don't fall under the same category
because they do not have the same goals.
Artistic languages ​​are not intended
 to be means of communication
beyond that for the characters of the world 
for which they have been created,
they are only conceived within an artistic work
(usually narrative, be it a film, a book, a series…).
[Dorotea] 
And what would Esperanto be?
It would be within the category
 of communicative languages,
which are languages ​​created for human communication.
But there are also many communicative languages,
there are two that stand out the most for their use:
Esperanto and Interlingua
(the name of my other YouTube channel,
 Liga Romanica,
is in Interlingua, for example, 
that's why it doesn't have an accent ; )).
[Dorotea] 
And what about happiness?
Ok, we got there.
The other group we had were the philosophical ones.
These languages ​​are, in a way, conceptual,
created to demonstrate or represent a purpose or value.
Here is, for example, Ithkuil,
a language constructed in order to express
deeper levels of human cognition.
[Dorotea] 
Let's see, give an example
 of this that I can't imagine.
Aukkras êqutta ogvëuļa tnou'elkwa 
pal-lši augwaikštülnàmbu.
The truth is that I have no idea how to read it,
but this very short sentence
 would be transmitting
the imaginary idea of ​​a naked woman
 in the middle of a staircase
and each step down,
 each body movement
is combined with a three-dimensional 
trail that there is behind her.
All this forms something timeless
that is supposed to be considered
 intellectual, emotional and aesthetic.
Come on, all that in that sentence...
This language would overwhelm me a lot.
Super intense…
[Dorotea] 
Who came up with the idea?
The language was created by John Quijada in 1978,
although this man has not stopped 
working on it at any time.
It has made three important revisions
and the fourth version of this language
 is planned for this same year, 2023.
It is an extremely difficult language,
with many sounds and morphemes,
and its main objective is to be concise,
eliminating the high degree of ambiguity 
that can exist in natural languages.
Its author intends to demonstrate that in Ithkuil
it is possible to transmit a clear message,
which does not involve any 
misinterpretation or understanding,
and with much fewer words than other languages.
For this reason,
 the very name of the language means
“hypothetical representation of a language”.
The writing system is also very complex,
it has around 3,600 morphophonetic characters,
that is, some represent morphemes and others sounds.
[Dorotea] 
For example?
Well this:
The very name of the language 
and don't ask me what's what
because it's extremely complex
and no one currently fully masters it.
[Dorotea] 
Well, and the language of happiness, what?
And yes, our language of happiness 
is another example of a philosophical language.
This language is called toki pona.
It was created to be a language of happiness,
because there are hardly any negative concepts
(from a Western point of view, of course,
because its creator is a Canadian woman of Slavic descent)
and its vocabulary is super-essential and reduced.
This language was created in 2001
and, according to the author, this language is
an "attempt to understand 
the meaning of life with 120 words".
Obviously, the toki pona
 is the complete antithesis of the ithkuil.
It is a super-minimalist language
and it is true that it started with 120 words,
but now it has a few more (not many, 137).
Toki means 'to speak' (from English talk)
and pona means 'good/or' (from Esperanto bona).
The toki pona only has these letters,
which are also always written in lower case,
because there are no capital letters.
The vowels are pronounced
 the same as in Spanish,
j and w are semivowels or semiconsonants
(like our i/u when they make a diphthong,
said badly and quickly: when, well),
and the rest are pronounced
 as a Spanish speaker would pronounce them.
Perhaps the only exception are ptk,
which can be pronounced
 like this, that is, voiceless,
but also voiced, like bdg.
It is the same and it is the same.
Pronouns can also function as possessives,
for example, mi means 'I',
and mama mi means my mother/father
(because mama is mother or father, indistinctly).
And if we put that pronoun after a noun,
it becomes a possessive.
[Dorotea] 
So, “my, mom” would be 'me, mom',
 like I'm a mother;
[Dorotea] 
So, “my, mom” would be 'me, mom',
 like I'm a mother;
[Dorotea] 
while “mama mi”, would it be 'my mother'?
Exact.
Also, there are no tenses.
How are we to understand time?
For context,
we are simply going to add words
 like before, yesterday, tomorrow,
last week, next year...
(But come on, this happens
 in many natural languages ​​too,
without going any further, in Malay,
although well, we do have to go a bit far, really...).
Verbs can simply be nouns acting as verbs
(and this isn't so rare either, it happens a lot in English)…
[Dorotea] 
Wait, wait. Like “drink” which is 'beber' and 'bebida'?
Exact.
And in toki pona, to know that it is a verb,
the particle "li" is added in front of it.
jan wawa li pali e tomo
“a strong person builds a house”.
The verb is Pali, because it has li before it.
But of course, since there are so few words,
the meaning of each one is vast.
For example, the verb jo means
to have, carry, load, maintain, endure...
ma means land, exterior, field, territory...
[Dorotea] 
But, then, why is it the language of happiness?
[Dorotea] 
Because, how can you make superambiguous phrases
[Dorotea]
 you interpret them as you want and you can interpret them
[Dorotea] 
always as it suits you best?
[Dorotea]
 But of course, the opposite could also happen
[Dorotea] 
and become the language of nightmares...
It's the language of happiness because 
that's how it came out of the ***** to call its author
and because it doesn't 
have words to represent, to priori,
negative concepts.
But it also seems silly to me
to want to create a language 
that only expresses happiness,
it is strange that to be happy 
you have to amputate
half of what it means to be 
a human being sentimentally.
Sadness is not bad per se,
the bad thing is not knowing how to carry it.
Sadness is natural, wanting to always 
be happy gives PUT * DISGUST.
(Let's see, actually I don't think so,
I even read once that
 if you smiled when you were sad,
you fooled your brain
and I confirm that it really works).
And you, what do you prefer?
A minimalist or a complex one that poses a challenge.
Although for a challenge... 
the one you can do with Lingoda!
Let's see, let's talk seriously.
That of learning a language in a week is a scam.
Languages ​​take time and effort.
Lingoda doesn't sell you any miracle method,
basically because that doesn't exist,
what it allows you is to study four languages
​​(well, they offer 4 quite useful ones,
let's say they have focused on four
and have created materials for those four,
although hey, in actually there are five 
because they also have business English).
What I like the most is that
 there are teachers from everywhere,
that is, you are going to hear 
a lot of different accents;
You can go to class any day and at any time
and they are super small groups.
I have worked in the world of language teaching
and it has a good price
(in addition, if you use the code LINGU20
 you have a discount of €20 or $25).
It is true that a good price is still a lot for many people
and here is the grace of Lingoda.
We can compensate for the fact of 
not being able to pay for it,
of being stingy or
 of not wanting to invest in languages
​​(which, to be honest, 
I don't understand this...)
with our time,
or rather with our motivation
because time is the same .
If you do a super sprint 
and don't miss any classes,
they give you back everything you paid for.
Of course, you have to go to 60 classes in 60 days.
(But I don't know if you understood me,
if you don't miss any class
 they will give you everything back,
the course is free).
Another option is the sprint,
in this case there are 30 classes in 60 days,
but still, if you don't miss any class,
 you have a prize,
in this case they will refund 
half of what you have paid.
I know I've told you many times,
 but seriously, try it,
because it's super good.
Leyenda: La lengua de la felicidad SÍ existe.

Se acabó el reembolso del 100%, pero prepárate para algo aún mejor: ¡más clases gratuitas para celebrar tus logros! 🌟
Completa el Sprint normal, asiste a 30 clases en 2 meses y consigue 40 clases gratis como recompensa. Opta por el Super Sprint, completa 60 clases y desbloquea 75 lecciones gratuitas 🥇🏆
https://try.lingoda.com/Linguriosa_AprilSprint
O usa esté CÓDIGO: LINGU20

📚Bibliografía:
- http://serbal.pntic.mec.es/~cmunoz11/eduardo.html
- Solresol: Un viejo y olvidado lenguaje universal creado a partir de la música
https://www.neoteo.com/solresol-un-viejo-y-olvidado-lenguaje-universal-creado-a-partir-de-la-musica/
- https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Volapük#Muestras_de_volapük
- http://www.ithkuil.net/01_phonology.html
- https://lipu-sona.pona.la/4.html
- https://subetealanutria.wordpress.com/tag/ithkuil/
- Esperanto/Lecturas/Texto completo - Wikilibros https://es.wikibooks.org/wiki/Esperanto/Lecturas/Texto_completo
- http://www.ithkuil.net/00_intro.html
- https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hildegarda_de_Bingen
- http://www.hildegardiana.es/5pdf/idioma_desconocido.pdf
- Jeffrey Schnapp Virgin Words: Hildegard of Bingen’s Lingua Ignota and the development of Imaginary Languages ancient to modern  Exemplaria, enero 1991

🥕Mi Newsletter (más contenido gratuito):  https://bit.ly/newsletter-linguriosa

👇👇Si quieres y puedes apoyar este PROYECTO
https://www.patreon.com/linguriosa
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/linguriosaES

🔴LINGUCOMUNIDAD:
https://discord.gg/3kYuqAbzC4

🎁WEB:
https://www.linguriosa.com/

INSTAGRAM:
https://www.instagram.com/_linguriosa_/

FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/Linguriosa-106220947464950

🎵Música de mis vídeos: https://www.epidemicsound.com/referral/bxtod9/

Dorotea (Patreon):
Manel F. Martinez-Aroca Marin
Curtis Walker
Craig Ludington

Los Señores de la RAE (Patreon):
Mario Pacheco
Franz Pereira
Pierre Laplante
Leo Edermaniger
Begoña
Julia Mc Cray
Javier Álvarez García
Héctor Vilar Górriz 
Jose Hernandez
Ela Valentina
Jonathan Miljus
Victor Sanchez
Kathrin Mendoza
Charles Lee
Steve Groen
Edgar
Oded Lahat Bursztyn
Billy Billy
Leonor Loução
Sam
Capatapa
David Bissinger
Victor Tavares
José Horacio Cabrera
John Adams
Portuguese With Leo
Gianluca Repossi
Kathy Rugg
Pablo Torres
sergio valdez
Davide Gemello
Jean Pierre Lefebvre 
DonL
Bo Hemphill
Doug Lefler
Ruben Ferreyra
Monika B
EK Powell
Ttulo: Si hablas ESTA LENGUA, eres FELIZ 😁
Assistant: