A unfair law causes people to rebel and act against it while trying to change it. Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King explains how he can’t rely on the courts or the government about justice and how non-violent protests are necessary to end segregation. In the document, “Civil Disobedience: A Threat to Our Law Society”, Morris L. Leibman argues that the idea of civil disobedience is harmful to others and not a legitimate form of protest and how it’s better to deal with it in a nonviolent way. While Leibman argues that civil disobedience isn’t a effective way to protest, Martin Luther King Jr. believes in the effectiveness of nonviolent protests to fight against unfair treatment and segregation, and the need for it when the legal and government systems fail to notice it. MLK would disagree with Leibman as he believed civil disobedience was a necessary way to protest social justice and segregation.
Martin Luther King Jr. and Leibman both have different point in views over the idea of civil disobedience. In King’s, “Letter from Birmingham Jail”, King believes that civil disobedience is a efficient form of protest that goes against unfair laws and the government. King says, “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (King). Leibman, however, disagreed with this idea and “insist that men use their minds and not their biceps” (Leibman). Leibman believes that democracy only works when everybody follows the law. MLK would disagree with Leibman since he believes civil disobedience is a legitimate form of protest.
Martin Luther King Jr. believed in fighting against unfair laws through civil disobedience. In King’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” he argues that unfair laws are those that “degrades human personality” (King). King believed that it was necessary to disobey such laws because they were immoral and went against human justice. For King, disobeying unfair laws meant actively fighting against them using peaceful protests. However, Leibman believed it was better to protest through nonviolent means and not disrupt the peace. He thought that nonviolent tactics were the best way to protest without causing harm. 
Martin Luther King Jr. believed that changing unfair laws through the court system would take too long and cost too many lives. Instead, he pushed for direct action by way of peaceful protests and civil disobedience as a quicker means of change. MLK states this by saying, “For years now I have heard the word “Wait!” It rings in the ear of every Negro with piercing familiarity. This “Wait” has almost always meant “Never,” We must come to see…that “justice too long delayed is justice denied.” (King). Leibman disagreed with King, believing that following the law was the only way to have a successful democracy. However, King argued that the court system was too slow and flawed for his plan to work. King believed that by actively protesting and disobeying unjust laws, people could transform public opinion and force government to take action. By doing this, people could show that the law must work for the people, not the other way around. MLK would disagree with Leibman since he thought relying on the courts to change the laws was a waste of time.


write a conclusion to this. make it easier to understand. make it 9th grade level. make it five sentences.