System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
[Instruction]
In the following conversation, try to guess what word should come into the <MASK>.\n\n[Conversation]\n
"A:How do you do , Mr . Johnson ? I'm Thomas .", "B: How do you do ?", "A: I'm coming for the job you've advertised in yesterday's newspaper .", "B: OK . What's your working experience ?", "A: I have worked for IBM for <MASK> .", "B: How do your experiences benefit our company ?", "A: I know the marketing from top to bottom and I can develop a new market for you .", "B: Are you aware of the aspects of this position and do you feel you are qualified ?", "A: Yes , I understand my qualification and your needs by researching your company .", "B: If you enter this company , what section would you like to work in ?", "A: If possible , I'd like to be positioned in the International Trade Department .", "B: Then , what starting salary do you expect ?", "A: I'd like to start at RIB 4,000 a month .

[Ground truth Answer]
5 and half years

[Assistant's Response]
In the provided conversation, the word that fits into the <MASK> is "five years." The dialogue centers around a job interview, where the candidate, Thomas, is discussing his qualifications and work history with Mr. Johnson. Specifically, when Mr. Johnson asks about Thomas's "working experience," the candidate is likely to mention a duration of employment at IBM, which is a common way to express professional experience in such contexts. Therefore, a complete sentence would read: "I have worked for IBM for five years." 

This choice not only aligns with typical interview responses but also emphasizes the candidate's relevant experience, which is crucial in demonstrating his qualifications for the position.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: