User: 

You are given access to make searches on the Internet. The format for making a search is:
1. After the user sends a message, you will decide whether to make a search. If you choose to make a search, you will output a single message, starting with the word <web_search>, followed by ONLY your web search query. After your search query, you must output the token </web_search> to denote the end of the search query. Keep your search query very concise.
2. The system will then append the web search results at the end of the user message, starting with the token <web_search_results>. Take note that the user CANNOT SEE the content after <web_search_results> - YOU should use these results appropriately to improve your response. Additionally, If the web search results are already present in the user's message, then you MUST NOT request another web search.

IMPORTANT! You should choose to search the web ONLY if ANY of the following circumstances are met:
1. User is asking about current events or something that requires real-time information (news, sports scores, 'latest' information, etc.)
2. User is asking about some term you are unfamiliar with (e.g. if it's a little-known term, if it's a person you don't know well, etc.)
3. User is asking about anything that involves numerical facts (e.g. distances between places, population count, sizes, date and time, etc.)
4. User explicitly asks you to search or provide links to references.
If the user's query does NOT require a web search, YOU MUST NEVER run one for no reason. However, you must not refuse to search the web if the user asks you to do so.
If you are highly unsure about whether to make a search (e.g. if the user's query is vague or if you think you are unfamiliar with the query to a certain extent), you may directly ask the user for clarification.

When using web search results, you are encouraged to cite references where appropriate, using inline links in standard markdown format.
You are also allowed to make use of web search results from previous messages, if they are STRONGLY RELEVANT to the current message.

When you are not running a web search, respond completely as per normal - there is NO NEED to mention that you're not searching. 
Remember that you MUST NOT make up any false information.
Assistant: Understood. I will strictly follow these instructions in this conversation.
User: what's the best LLM for python programming?
Assistant: As of my last update, several large language models (LLMs) are recognized for their capabilities in assisting with Python programming. Some of the most notable ones include:

1. **OpenAI Codex**: This is a specialized version of the GPT-3 model, fine-tuned for programming tasks. It powers GitHub Copilot, which helps developers by providing code suggestions, autocompletions, and functions based on comments or existing code.

2. **GPT-4**: The latest version of OpenAI's general-purpose model, which can also assist with coding queries, help understand concepts, provide example code snippets, and more. Its versatility makes it a strong candidate for Python programming.

3. **Google's PaLM (Pathways Language Model)**: A powerful model capable of handling various tasks, including coding in multiple programming languages, including Python.

4. **Anthropic's Claude**: This model is built with alignment and usability in mind and can be effective for programming assistance.

5. **Hugging Face's Transformers**: While not a single model, Hugging Face offers various transformer models that can be fine-tuned for specific tasks, including natural language understanding and code generation. For instance, models like GPT-Neo or GPT-J have been used for programming tasks.

6. **PolyCoder**: This is an open-source model that has been tailored for coding tasks, and it can generate code in several programming languages.

7. **Tabnine**: An AI pair programmer that integrates with various IDEs and suggests completions based on context, leveraging models trained specifically for coding tasks.

The choice of the best LLM for Python programming largely depends on your specific needs, such as whether you require real-time code suggestions (like with GitHub Copilot), responses to programming questions (like with GPT-4), or the ability to understand and generate longer scripts. It's also worth considering the availability of these models and their integration with your development environment.
User: is windsurf or cursor AI better?

<web_search_results> for "Windsurf AI vs Cursor AI comparison":

{
  "results": {
    "organic": [
      {
        "title": "I tried Cursor vs Windsurf with a medium sized ASPNET + Vite ...",
        "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1gwghx1/i_tried_cursor_vs_windsurf_with_a_medium_sized/",
        "snippet": "Here's what I noted in the review: - Windsurf edged out better with a medium to big codebase - it understood the context better - Cursor Tab is still better ...",
        "date": "Nov 21, 2024",
        "sitelinks": [
          {
            "title": "Anyone use Windsurf (cursor alternative) yet? : r/ChatGPTCoding",
            "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1gu8gk2/anyone_use_windsurf_cursor_alternative_yet/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cursor vs. Windsurf: Real-World Experience with Large Codebases",
            "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1htlx48/cursor_vs_windsurf_realworld_experience_with/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Cursor vs Windsurf vs Cline - What's the best at the moment? - Reddit",
            "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1hhh1tc/cursor_vs_windsurf_vs_cline_whats_the_best_at_the/"
          },
          {
            "title": "Windsurf vs Cursor : r/ChatGPTCoding - Reddit",
            "link": "https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1hdo0fz/windsurf_vs_cursor/"
          }
        ],
        "position": 1
      },
      {
        "title": "Windsurf vs Cursor: which is the better AI code editor? - YouTube",
        "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9jgR-Ih_wGs",
        "snippet": "Cursor is for the people who know how to code. And windsurf is for the people who don't. 13:04 · Go to channel · Which AI App Builder Should ...",
        "date": "Dec 17, 2024",
        "position": 2
      },
      {
        "title": "Windsurf vs Cursor — Initial Thoughts - DEV Community",
        "link": "https://dev.to/druchan/windsurf-vs-cursor-initial-thoughts-40b6",
        "snippet": "Windsurf is/feels faster · Windsurf's \"Write\" mode beats Cursor + Verifying code suggestion in a smaller frame is hard! · It's easier to add file ...",
        "date": "Dec 2, 2024",
        "position": 3
      },
      {
        "title": "Cursor vs Windsurf - which is the BEST AI Code Editor? - YouTube",
        "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qtr9Dyl7MZ0",
        "snippet": "Windsurf and Cursor are top-of-the-line AI code editors. They have many powerful features ranging from AI code assistance to Agentic AI ...",
        "date": "Nov 25, 2024",
        "position": 4
      },
      {
        "title": "Windsurf was Indeed Better Than Cursor IDE – t3.gg is biased",
        "link": "https://dev.to/dev_michael/windsurf-is-indeed-better-than-cursor-ide-t3gg-is-biased-4bia",
        "snippet": "Why Windsurf Over Cursor? · Unlimited rapid AI autocomplete suggestions · Unlimited in-editor AI chats · Unlimited AI command instructions · Cascade ...",
        "date": "Nov 19, 2024",
        "position": 5
      },
      {
        "title": "Windsurf vs. Cursor - which AI coding app is better? - Prompt Warrior",
        "link": "https://www.thepromptwarrior.com/p/windsurf-vs-cursor-which-ai-coding-app-is-better",
        "snippet": "But in my tests, I've found that Cursor tends to produce higher quality results. For example, when I used CopyCoder prompts to clone an app ...",
        "date": "Dec 12, 2024",
        "position": 6
      },
      {
        "title": "Windsurf vs Cursor AI: Which is Better for Coding? - Analytics Vidhya",
        "link": "https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2024/12/windsurf-vs-cursor-ai/",
        "snippet": "Cursor generates single-page applications quickly, while Windsurf focuses on structured, multi-file generation. Windsurf is minimal and hands- ...",
        "date": "Dec 25, 2024",
        "position": 7
      },
      {
        "title": "Windsurf vs Cursor: The AI IDE Battle - YouTube",
        "link": "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AD4BLcJf5Bg",
        "snippet": "A detailed comparison of Windsurf and Cursor, two leading AI coding assistants. We'll explore their shared features like code completion and ...",
        "date": "Nov 21, 2024",
        "position": 8
      },
      {
        "title": "Cursor vs Windsurf: The AI-Powered IDE Showdown You Didn't ...",
        "link": "https://0xksure.medium.com/cursor-vs-windsurf-the-ai-powered-ide-showdown-you-didnt-know-you-needed-adfb2f53b509",
        "snippet": "Both Cursor and Windsurf offer compelling advantages for developers. The choice between them largely depends on individual preferences and project requirements.",
        "date": "Nov 19, 2024",
        "sitelinks": [
          {
            "title": "Windsurf: The Innovative...",
            "link": "https://0xksure.medium.com/cursor-vs-windsurf-the-ai-powered-ide-showdown-you-didnt-know-you-needed-adfb2f53b509#:~:text=Windsurf%3A%20The%20Innovative%20Newcomer"
          },
          {
            "title": "Feature Comparison",
            "link": "https://0xksure.medium.com/cursor-vs-windsurf-the-ai-powered-ide-showdown-you-didnt-know-you-needed-adfb2f53b509#:~:text=Feature%20Comparison"
          },
          {
            "title": "Ai Integration And...",
            "link": "https://0xksure.medium.com/cursor-vs-windsurf-the-ai-powered-ide-showdown-you-didnt-know-you-needed-adfb2f53b509#:~:text=AI%20Integration%20and%20Contextual%20Awareness"
          }
        ],
        "position": 9
      }
    ]
  }
}
Assistant:  comparison between Windsurf AI and Cursor AI indicates that both have unique strengths. Here's a summary:

1. **Context Understanding**: Windsurf appears to outshine Cursor when dealing with medium to large codebases due to its deeper context understanding. This is especially noted in various user reviews where Windsurf handles complex projects more effectively (see [Reddit discussion](https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1gwghx1/i_tried_cursor_vs_windsurf_with_a_medium_sized/)).

2. **Usability & Features**: Cursor is often described as being suited for those who are already familiar with coding, whereas Windsurf is noted for its seamless performance and ease of use, particularly in “Write” mode which allows for faster code generation ([DEV Community review](https://dev.to/druchan/windsurf-vs-cursor-initial-thoughts-40b6)).

3. **Performance in Different Scenarios**: Windsurf seems to excel in structured, multi-file generation, while Cursor is recognized for its speed in creating single-page applications. This could influence your decision based on the specific projects you are working on ([Analytics Vidhya article](https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2024/12/windsurf-vs-cursor-ai/)).

4. **Overall Preference**: Some users lean towards Windsurf for its rapid AI autocomplete and chat features, while others still see Cursor as delivering higher quality code in certain contexts ([t3.gg review](https://dev.to/dev_michael/windsurf-is-indeed-better-than-cursor-ide-t3gg-is-biased-4bia)).

In summary, if you prioritize context and performance with larger projects, Windsurf might be the better choice. However, if you are looking for a tool that quickly delivers single-page applications and you already have coding experience, Cursor could be preferable. Consider trying both to see which aligns better with your workflow.
User: can you give me a rundown on how to use github for personal projects as a completete newbie?
Assistant: