System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Plan an agenda for the daily standup meetings. Assign a time duration to each topic on the agenda.

[Ground truth Answer]
[10 min] Status check
- Current and upcoming work
- Have spare bandwidth
- Any blockers?
[5 min] Big project status + general updates
[5 min] Discuss blockers, otherwise social time
[2 min] Add follow Ups

[Assistant's Response]
Sure! Here’s a suggested agenda for daily standup meetings, complete with time durations for each topic:

### Daily Standup Meeting Agenda

1. **Welcome and Opening (2 minutes)**
   - Brief greeting and setting the tone for the meeting.

2. **Team Updates (10 minutes)**
   - Each team member shares their progress since the last meeting (1-2 minutes per person).

3. **Current Challenges (5 minutes)**
   - Discuss any obstacles team members are facing and brainstorm quick solutions.

4. **Goals for the Day (5 minutes)**
   - Each member outlines their main objectives for the day.

5. **Announcements (3 minutes)**
   - Share any important news, upcoming events, or deadlines.

6. **Wrap-Up and Next Steps (2 minutes)**
   - Summarize key points and confirm any follow-up actions.

### Total Duration: 27 minutes

Feel free to adjust the time allocations based on your team's size and needs!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: