1_ Translate the following legal text into colloquial Farsi. 2_ Place the Farsi and English text with a single line between each other, that is, the English text is a single line.  A space and then a translation line and...
            4- Using legal language for Persian translation 5- Continue to the end of the text

               .For example, let us suppose that you and I enter a shop in which you want to make a purchase. The shopkeeper may not wish to sell the goods to you unless you have a guarantor, i.e. a person who will undertake to pay for the goods if you default in payment. I inform the shopkeeper that I will pay for the goods if you do not (or are unable to) pay. This is a guarantee. You are primarily liable on the contract, while I am secondarily liable in the event of your default. The shopkeeper should ensure that some document (the 'note or memoran- dum') is completed, and signed by me as guarantor signifying the agreement.
This was emphasized in Actionstrength Limited (t/a Vital Resources) v. International Glass Engineering IN. GL.EN SpA (2003) where the claimants action failed because the contract involved was a contract of guarantee and had not been evidenced in writing.
In J. Pereira SA v. Mecha (2006) it was prima facie held that whilst an email was capable of being a sufficient note or memorandum for the purpose of satisfying Section 4 of the Statute of Frauds, 1677, the insertion of a persons email address did not constitute a signature for the purposes of Section 4.
A contract of guarantee must be distinguished from an indemnity. Thus, if you and I go into a shop and I say to the shopkeeper: 'Let him have the goods, I will ensure you are paid' (or 'I will pay for them'), I am indemnify- ing the shopkeeper against loss on the contract. I am primarily liable on the contract, and may be sued by the creditor. Such is not a guarantee; it is an indemnity, and no writing is required to evidence the agreement.
Contracts subject to section 40 of the Law of Property Act, 1925. Section 40 provides that
No action may be brought upon any contract for the sale or other dispos- ition of land or any other interest in land, unless the agreement upon which such action is brought, or some memorandum or note thereof, is in writing, and signed by the party to be charged or by some other person thereunto by him lawfully authorized.
Contracts for the sale of land* are obviously highly important, first because land itself has always been of great value, and secondly because the law insists that particularly strong evidence should be necessary to prove the dispos- itions of land by way of sale or transfer. The phrase 'or other disposition' of land refers to leases, mortgages, etc., and these too require to be evidenced in writing. Further emphasis is given to this rule by section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1989, which also requires the con- tract to be in writing and to contain all the terms agreed by the parties.
Note or Memorandum.' Ideally, contracts of the above kind (guarantees or sales or transfers of land) should be wholly in writing in one clearly written or printed form. Unfortunately life is not always tidy and efficient, and the written evidence may consist in a number of documents, e.g. letters. Provided that there is some indication, oral or written, connecting them, the various documents taken together may evidence the contract and thus constitute the 'memoran- dum' to satisfy the evidential requirements of the law.
The memorandum must contain the following:
(a) The names of the parties (or sufficient description to identify them). (b) The subject-matter of the contract (i.e. the goods, land, etc.).
*This refers to the preliminary agreement, and not to the conveyance which must be by deed.