Given multiple reviews about 1966 ['movie'] ['Batman: The Movie'], each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ["You have to rate this as a comedy, I couldn't stop laughing at the one liners & the special effects (the Bat shark repellent...brilliant). If only the blockbusters of the 80's & 90's had as many laughs. Worth a look for nostalgic purposes, reminds you of the TV series we grew up with.", 'If one were going to rate this movie on its actual merit, it wouldn\'t, of course, fare very well. But to do so would be to miss the point of the whole thing. This was Batman! The real Batman! In the days before "The Dark Knight," in the days before Christian Bale and Val Kilmer and Michael Keaton and George Clooney - in the days before any of that, children, there was Adam West, and the original 60\'s TV series. It was bad and it was fun and it was funny! The acting was so bad it was good! The villains were so evil they were irresistible! This movie tries to put that all together. It seems to have been put out after the first season of the wildly popular TV series had ended. Adam West was here as Bruce Wayne/Batman, and Burt Ward as Wayne\'s "ward" Dick Grayson and Batman\'s sidekick Robin. Four of the best of the TV villains were here - the Penguin (Burgess Meredith), the Joker (Cesar Romero), the Riddler (Frank Gorshin and the Catwoman (played here by Lee Merriwether, subbing for Julie Newmar, who played the character in Season 1 of the TV series.) And the usual supporting characters were there: Alan Napier as the faithful butler Alfred, Neil Hamilton as Commissioner Gordon, Stafford Repp as Chief O\'Hara and Madge Blake as Aunt Harriet. In other words, all the people who made the TV series work so well were part of this project (and Merriwether added a certain freshness with her own take on the Catwoman.) The plot - as you would absolutely expect - is paperthin, revolving around a wild scheme by the four villains (who join together as the "United Underworld") to kidnap the members of the Security Council of the "United World" by dehydrating them and turning them to dust and asking for $1 billion from each of their nations. All the gadgets are there, from the "Super Dehydrated Molecular Separator" in the Batcave, to the batmobile, the batboat, the bat copter and the batcycle. There are the same ridiculous antics. Batman tries to dispose of a bomb but finds that everywhere he wants to dispose of it there\'s something that needs protecting from it (from a couple of nuns to a mother with a baby carriage to young lovers in a boat to a Salvation Army band to a flock of baby ducks.) "Some days," Batman says, "you just can\'t get rid of a bomb." Then, as the movie ends with the Security Council rehydrated, Batman suggests to Robin that they leave "inconspicuously - through the window." That would do it. In other words, everything that made the TV series such fun was here in abundance. And perhaps that\'s the problem. I don\'t know what sort of reception this received when it was released. Looked at today, almost 45 years later, it\'s too much. You can\'t take the campy sort of fun that was contained in half hour episodes of the TV series (I know, they were always two parts so they were an hour, but the two parts were separated by a week!) and stretch it out to two hours. It does get tiresome after a while. It\'s too much of the same. There\'s nothing really original here. What made the TV series work doesn\'t make a movie work. And yet - if only from a nostalgic perspective - this is great fun. Does it deserve a rating of 6 out of 10? On technical merit, and on all the things that usually make a movie work, the answer is a definite "no." But this is "Batman." For the sheer campiness associated with the 60\'s show, it deserves at least that!'] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.