System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Predict the discourse marker continuation\n"Suddenly, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Lately, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Secondly, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Alternatively the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Nevertheless the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Separately, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Ideally, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Evidently, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Admittedly, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."
    "Besides, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains."

[Ground truth Answer]
Admittedly, the library at this point is a little disappointing, but it seems like every Sony console lately has rough growing pains.

[Assistant's Response]
The most fitting discourse marker to continue the sentence is "Nevertheless." This marker effectively conveys a sense of contrast or concession, acknowledging the current disappointment in the library while also recognizing that early challenges are a common occurrence with new Sony console releases. This aligns well with the sentiment of the sentence, balancing the negative aspect with an understanding of typical industry patterns.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: