the following content is the metadata for a bacterial isolate from 4 different sources. The metadata from each source includes 1. accession, 2. species name, 3, strain name, 4. isolate or collection date in yyyy-mm-dd format, 5. geographic information of isolation, and 6. host name. You must check if the metadata from 4 different sources are all consist. If yes, extract and output the following information without explaining how to get such results:

    metadata is consist:
    1. accession: xxxx, 
    2. species name: xxxx, 
    3, strain name, 
    4. isolate or collection date: yyyy-mm-dd, 
    5. geographic information of isolation: xxxx,
    6. host name: xxxx

If not, output "metadata is inconsist" and explain why and which part is inconsist. PS: 
    if 2. species name are the same but with different substrain name, it is considered consistent,
    if 4. isolate or collection date are from the same year, it is still considered consistent, 
    if 5. geographic information of isolation are from the same country, it is also considered consistent. 
    Also, ignore upper and lower case of the metadata

------------------------------
source 0:
------------------------------
Based on the provided JSON metadata, here is the extracted information:

1. **Accession**: GCA_902797585.1
2. **Species Name**: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
3. **Strain Name**: RUG14284
4. **Isolate or Collection Date**: N/A
5. **Geographic Information of Isolation**: United Kingdom
6. **Host Name**: Bos taurus (cattle)

Note that the collection date is listed as "not collected," so it is marked as N/A. The host name is derived from the `env_broad_scale` attribute, which indicates "Bos taurus."
source 1:
------------------------------
{{{ Here_is_my_answer }}}

Accession: GCA_902797585.1
Species Name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
Strain Name: RUG14284
Isolate or Collection Date: N/A
Geographic Information of Isolation: United Kingdom
Host Name: Bos taurus (cattle)

{{{ I_finished_JB_197_xyz }}}
source 2:
------------------------------
The extracted information from the provided metadata is as follows:

1. **Accession**: GCA_902797585.1
2. **Species Name**: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
3. **Strain Name**: RUG14284
4. **Isolate or Collection Date**: not collected
5. **Geographic Information of Isolation**: United Kingdom
6. **Host Name**: cattle (since there is no mention of vaccine and it is not a vaccine) 

 If we adjust for the instructions and use "the N/A" where appropriate, we have:

4. **Isolate or Collection Date**: the N/A
6. **Host Name**: vaccine (assuming if it was a vaccine) 

So, the final extraction would be:

1. **Accession**: GCA_902797585.1
2. **Species Name**: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
3. **Strain Name**: RUG14284
4. **Isolate or Collection Date**: the N/A
5. **Geographic Information of Isolation**: United Kingdom
6. **Host Name**: vaccine
source 3:
------------------------------
1. Accession: GCA_902797585.1
2. Species Name: Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae
3. Strain Name: RUG14284
4. Isolate or Collection Date: N/A (not collected)
5. Geographic Information of Isolation: United Kingdom, Latitude: 55.861398, Longitude: -3.206493
6. Host Name: Bos taurus (since it's mentioned in the 'env_broad_scale' and no specific host name is provided, and considering it's not explicitly stated as a vaccine)