vorrei che creassi degli altri appunti con questa trascrizione della lezione successiva, considera che ci sono molti errori di trascrizione quindi non prendere tutto per buono e cerca di correggere il correggibile. 
sullla base di questa trascrizione della lezione di inglese spiegata dalla mia professoressa, crea degli appunti che siano sia discorsivi sia schematici quando necessario. Considera che il trascrittore potrebbe aver fatto degli errori nel trascrivere quindi se è necessario comprendi gli errori di trascrizione e correggili.scrivi tutto in inglese e non usare solo gli schemi, devi usare gli schemi quando necessario e la forma discorsiva quando la ritieni più opportuna. hai escluso alcuni concetti presenti nella trascrizione. E' importante che tu non abbia omesso nulla di cio che viene detto nella trascrizione dalla professoressa, cosicche gli appunti possano essere il più completi possibili, Inoltre gli appunti devono essere in inglese. 
voglio degli appunti molto più discorsivi e meno schematici. più o meno ci siamo, vorrei pero che usassi la terza persona negli appunti e che soprattutto tu non faccia riferimento al professore quando stai dicendo cosa ha detto, dillo e basta. Infine vorrei che dividessi gli appunti in vari sottoparagrafi in modo tale che lo studio sia poi più organico. Inoltre ti ho detto che gli appunti devono essere discorsivi, ma non per questo non devi creare del tutto qualche schema per riassumerli ai fini dello studio. In sintesi vorrei che creassi degli appunti, discosivi, ma allo stesso tempo adatti ad uno studio pratico:


So, last time we were saying that buying, buying, that we just, we just buy it. How do you say it in Italian? It's more of a time complement than an intro. Okay? Mid, M-I-D, means half.
Okay? So, what do you say in the middle of the day? Midday. There are two ways to say, two ways to say the middle of the day. At twelve, at noon.
In fact, afternoon is a better way to say it. Afternoon. And then at midday.
Midday is the middle of the day. So, by the mid-4th century, actually by the mid-5th century, 4th century, by the mid-5th century, Britain was a wealthy country. It was a wealthy country.
It was a wealthy country. Okay? So, the fact that the Romans had dominated for how many centuries? By the middle of the 5th century. The fact that recently, so there are three factors.
Before the arrival of the Romans, they were already a wealthy country. It was hard, hard, hard, hard country. So, they were already a hard country.
So, the Romans invaded the Roman capital, the Roman province. But, in the end, they established a period when they also came. So, by the middle of the 5th century, they began to establish a war with the Romans.
So, they did not have to worry about invading, invading, invading. So, this, then, can you see? So, these are the causes that lead to a period of peace. So, climate, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no Okay In fact, he could also count on becoming self-reliant in international relations, especially with France.
But the great intelligence of Leonardo was this, you understand, that for him to close his country he had to give up his country. This is a constant in the history of the United States. The reason why there has never been a great revolution.
There was not a revolution in the United States. There was not a revolution in 1840. There was not a revolution.
The American Revolution. The American Revolution. There was also a trigger.
The trigger of the French Revolution. The French Revolution. The French Revolution.
The American Revolution. But the great Italy, inside or outside of the European Union, has never exploited the seeds of the revolution. Never.
Because the English understood very quickly that it was in their interest to enrich themselves economically, they needed to have other benefits than conflicts. Stay away from conflicts. Stay away from conflicts because this leads to spending and destruction.
The only real revolution we have seen is the revolutionary revolution that leads to enriching ourselves. I say this because it has a social impact. It leads to enriching ourselves.
This is fundamental. In fact, in Italy, we have just seen what is the relationship between Britain and the French Revolution. What was it? If we are careful, we don't want to do like them.
Because if we do like them, if we are careful, we become economic slaves. The famous glorious revolution was a revolution that was not a revolution. There is a saying, to repeat the experience of Carlo Pino, who was in Italy.
In that period, he came and published that throughout the history of the Great Britain, what is it? Ten years of the Second World War. Ten years of the Second World War. Right? To avoid that, they were content to call someone who didn't know anything about it and said, what are you going to do? He said, I don't know why, it's bloodless.
It's bloodless. Then, in the end, after a while, the war came. Everyone applauded.
So, this thing that I'm saying now, which is that peace is equal to the influence of a nation, and a constant in the action of the Great Britain. It's the reason why, for example, the Americans have always been wonderful, amazing people, as Italy manages to survive, on the contrary, economically, and on the contrary, also faithfully, even though, after so many years, it fell continuously, even though it was a very unstable country. Now, you see, it's a very unstable country.
I grew up in a period in which every five or six months there was a revolt. So, it's unstable. How is it unstable? A country is closed.
Why? That kind of mentality, I mean, they had a period in which it was not clear who should be the president, who should be the king, because there was the wrong ranking, between outdoor and young Bush. They lived poorly, and emotionally, they also had this instability. For them, political stability is needed to live well.
In America, the mentality is always the same, if you take the mentality. So, this concept is done now, it is understood now, because it is a microcosm of all history in America. But all the English people, all the mentality, all the culture, that's why it's so unstable.
So, by the mid- 5th century, Britain had become a wealthy, flourishing country, thanks to the low political stability, long-term, long-term, political stability, which had needed a well-established country, and an advanced rural economy, due to the rural thanks to you too, thanks to you too, and rural thanks to and grazie a So, thanks to of you too, a long-term political stability, which had needed a well-established the country, a flourishing rural economy, and a mild climate, which have helped the rural economy. Such a world, which means such a, such a, such a world started to attract, started again to attract, to attract, attract, attract, so to speak, other populations, other European populations, other European tribes, populations in general. Now, what does namely mean? Namely, it's written namely.
It's written like this. Namely, that is, that is, that is, in English it's said in two words, so you say, that is, in the middle of here, in the middle of here, which is, which is exactly our that is, our that is, is actually one of the two words, that is, that is, which is of namely, it's written namely, with the letter L, the white colour. Namely, the Germanic tribes, the Germanic, Germanic tribes are from the area, from the area between the Lutheran peninsula and nowadays Belgium.
Look here. What is the Lutheran peninsula? There? There? No, no. Not that far.
There is always a distinction between the geographical name and the political name, ok? The Scandinavian peninsula is a geographical name, it's a geographical term. The political names are very different. Lutheran is written like this.
It's L-U-T-H-E-R-A-N-Y. Lutheran. But you didn't say it, did you? Anyway.
You don't need it? No. Well, I think you have it, you have it in your hand, perhaps we have it in your pocket. There you go.
That's it. I think it's over. That's it, it's over, it's fine.
Mm-hm. That's what it's for you, that's what it's for. So, namely, the Germanic tribes from the area between the usual peninsula and nowadays Belgium.
So, we always have to say nowadays. What is nowadays? Nowadays is what it is today. So I say nowadays Belgium.
I say Belgium. Because there is this question for a long time. Ok? So, there were these populations, that clearly, you see, they had a lot of land, and people were arriving, ok? And there, the Romans were no longer there, so, they had a lot of land.
Ok. And they didn't really have a lot of land. This is where they had a lot of land.
This white crop. The Shetland and the Orchard. Shetland and the Orchard.
Ok. So, such, this drives, this drives. First, raided.
That went to raid. And it was in the region of Trina. In the region of Trina.
Raid. La. La Raid.
La Raid. Ok. Yes.
This drives, ok? This is Trina. This drives, and this drives, first raided, the British coasts. After the Romans had left the island, then they began to settle in the island.
Anyway, there were 8 Germanic groups. Unfortunately, this group never spoke. This group was divided into two groups.
So, who were they precisely? So, precisely, the Germanic group were the Jutes. The Jutes, who settled mainly in Kent. So, the Jutes, who settled mainly in Kent, and along with the Jutes, the Germanic group were the Saxons.
So, I'm going to tell you a story. Do you know the Angles? What is the name of the Angle? The Angles, which settled along the eastern coast. The Angles, which settled along the eastern coast, The Angles, which settled along the eastern coast, and the Saxons between the Jutes and the Angles.
And the Saxons between the Jutes and the Angles. So, actually, from north to south, we have the Angles, the Saxons and the Jutes. Okay? Because the Saxons settled in the middle, they came later.
But they not only settled along the eastern coast, but also settled in the midlands. What are the midlands? The midlands is the central area of England. So, sorry, up to here, all of this is England.
Except for this part here, which is the Cowles. So, this part here is the Cowles. But, let me show you this, okay? This is all of England, all of Cornwall down here.
And this is the Firth of Warth. The Scrozzatura is here. On this part of the hill.
Okay? And here, where the Scrozzatura begins. This is the Caledonia. The one that was first built.
So, the Angles established themselves. There is another way to say it. Set all, okay? Established themselves along the eastern coast.
But also, as soon as they entered the inland. So, but also, and eventually, in the midlands. Eventually.
It does not mean eventually. It is written in the European language. It means subsequently.
It is a consonant. And eventually, in the midlands. Midlands.
Eventually, in the midlands. Okay. Go, go.
One, two, three, four. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. Go. Go.
Go. So So Please

So, the Saxons who settled in the first few months from the ash quarry of the river Thames. The river Thames, and then eastward, that's where it starts, and then eastward. So, the Britons, this is a Britons, the Britons is all wrong.
So, each had Romani infatti, e Romani che stavano in Gran Bretagna, ok? The Britons first tried to react back, to fight back against the Roman invaders. But, they were slowly pushed eastwards, well westwards is without the westwards, westwards into nowadays Wales and Cornwall, ok? Ok, and what now? The Britons, the Britons were those who were in Gran Bretagna who were a mix of Romani and Romani who had settled in Gran Bretagna and they were pushed westwards, ok, in Britons. And, by 570, ok, by 570, in 570, they were definitely forced to be west of Gloucester.
Gloucester, Gloucester is here, and it was a Roman fortress. Gloucester was here. So, they were pushed westwards, already in 570, they were west of Gloucester, which is here, and in the Bontaneous region of Wales.
That means, that the Arnosaxon, that the Germanic tribes called Weallas, which in their language, in their dialects means the land of the foreigners. The land of the foreigners, the land of the foreigners, the mountains of the enemies. So, the Germanic tribes, by establishing themselves in nowadays England, pushed the Britons northwards, northwards, ok, northwards, beyond the Edge of the Wall.
So, this was my little story of the future that we have, ok, that was written at a certain point in Rome, when they realized that they couldn't do it with the British, so they decided to do it with the English, as the Australians wanted to do with the Palestinians, as the Allies did with the Germans. So, when they realized that they couldn't do it with the British, they decided to do it with the English. So, the Britons pushed, the Germanic tribes pushed the Britons northwards, So, the word suffix, where does it come from? W-A-F-D-S This word suffix, which also exists in German, imprints movement to the prepositions, ok, or to the, let's say, to the places.
If I say northwards, it means to go to the north, if I say westwards, it means to go to the west. So, they pushed the Britons either northwards, beyond, beyond, beyond the edge of the wall, ok, westwards by 570 beyond Closter, and after 570 into the western area, the famous area, which nowadays is Wales, that was named so by the Germanic tribes as Wales, and then southwest into nowadays Rome. So, they pushed them from here, from here, and from here.
Ok, they established, they started to establish large communities that later became kingdoms, Kingdom, what does kingdom mean? Kingdom, how do you write kingdom? Kingdom Think of the word woman, woman, the word woman in English, which exists either by itself, and it is an archipelago, it is the dome of the woman, the dome of the woman, or it means, it is a suffix that serves to create nouns from other nouns. So, there is kingdom, to create nouns from other nouns, there is kingdom, ok? A bit, it is also like good, good, it is a suffix that is used in other nouns to create other nouns. We have friend to create nouns in layers, we have friend, which means friend, no, what is ship? Even ship I don't know what it is.
So, what does it mean? Let's say manhood, man is man, if I put manhood, manhood means utility, or oldhood, I add oldhood, oldhood means old age. Ship, it is another suffix that is used to create abstract nouns from non-verbal nouns. Friend, friendship, ok? Relation, relationship, ok.
So, by the 7th century, 7th century, 7th century. So, we are in the 6th century, ok? So, already, let's say, 50 years ago, ok? Because, at the beginning, I don't know, this part here I didn't tell you, you see that here there were scopes and fields, ok? So, there was one of the tribes that was in Caledonia, the ones that the Romans couldn't play with. And the scopes were, where were the scopes? They were in Ireland.
Then there were also, I don't know how many, in Scotland. But how many Romans went there? The first ones to make the deductions were from the East, ok? But if they went, why did they go? They went and came back. Even because they had already gone.
Did you understand? This part I didn't tell you. Then they started, that's why there are 410 Romans in Ireland. Because, right away, these are the ones that meet, the ones that were in the North and the ones that were in the South, the ones that were in the East.
But then the others started. And these started, let's say, after 450. Ok? But, 450, these were clearly further away.
There was the North and the South. That's why they decided to stay there. And so, at the beginning, they made an incursion.
Then, as I said last time, they realized that they were in a rich land, so they decided that it was not worth it to go back there, to face the English, etc. Because all the ones that depended on them, were the ones that never went back. So they decided to stay there.
By staying, they brought some communities, that are clearly more and more similar. So, if they start to make the deductions, in the middle of the 4th century, already towards the end of the 4th century, I mean, of the 5th century, at the beginning of the 4th century, they already had founded some communities. Ah, I understood everything.
I was so smart! I was so smart, ok. So, by the 7th century, there was hardly, there was hardly nothing left of the Celtic culture. By the 7th century, there was hardly nothing, there wasn't hardly anything left of the Celtic culture.
If they sweep away everything, there was nothing left. This is why people say, we don't know everything, because they didn't know everything. They didn't know everything.
So, of the language, of the Celtic language, and of the Celtic culture, we don't know much about this world. Except for the names of some rivers. Rivers.
For example, in human gains, gains is a Celtic name, ok? Gains. In human servants, servants, which is a name in English, which is also Celtic. In human mercy, written mercy, in the alphabet, which is also Celtic, in human avons, which is a name in English, gains, mercy, seven avons.
Why seven avons, where gains is a name in English, why should we know human avons? This one is written in English. But I think this one is beautiful, it's written in English, ok? Why? There is a Celtic city, which has a name, and then a few avons. And there is a person, there is a person, there is a person, there is not.
There is not. There is not. And it is found here, the land, here.
There is not. There is not. Ok, language.
Ok. Let's talk, then, about the fight of the stones, we'll talk about it another time. We'll talk about important things, because they remain, ok? This is the little box, which I like the most of all, ok? And you can see this, what is yellow are the years, what is blue are the stones.
So, the interna is born from the word sense, airplane of the word sense, which begins to configure, ok? The age of the stones. These, even if they were older, in reality, they were a bit like the Celts, they already knew that they were a little less civilized than the other stones. The stones didn't want to live anymore.
And these are the Nuki, and the Finns, ok? So, this is what you see, this letter, white. Let's see, ok. So, who were the Anglo-Saxons? So, they were farmers.
Also, they were farmers, like the Nazi, the Celts. That's why they realized that they had found a very rich and wealthy and wealthy country, ok? Because the agriculture that they had, that they saw there, that the Celts saw there, was a symptom of a much higher advancement of their work. So, the farmers had a great public support, and a possibility of a great economic growth.
They were also very efficient, right? So, if we think about where they came from, ok, from where they came from, from the left side of Europe, it's all flat, it's the sea. A little bit like the world, a little bit like the country. In the country, the economic conditions were very good, very good, because we, the land, we have it, ok? It's true that there are mountains in the north, but then there's all the mountains in the south, and so we had the possibility of cultivating the land in a neutral way, that is, we had a basic economy, and in fact, more rural and more rural, to remain very, very good.
Ok. Like the Celts, they were organized in big families, in clans, but after all, it wasn't very good, for example, right? Ok. As far as they, their values, why are we interested in this? Because, I always talk about this a lot, because it's the first product of literature, which is the non-verbal, which you won't do, don't worry, but we'll talk about it, because in this school we decided to start with the non-verbal, why not? Because, after all, it's in Antosassone, you can't read it, ok? It's illegible, so what happened to us are translations in ancient English, in ancient English, which were made in Italy, it's not even functional, you can't study it, but we're interested because there are some things that can be kept in the future.
So, from a cultural point of view, as far as their, as far as, how do you say as far as? As far as. As far as. Ok? As far as their values, the most important value was that of loyalty.
of loyalty. And, loyalty to whom? To the head, to the chief of the family, to the head of the family, don't use the word boss, don't use head, to the head of the family, to the head of the family, ok? And, yes, today, also that one of fairness. What is fairness? No.
Loyalty. What is fairness in English? What is fairness in English? To be fair. To be fair.
Ok, to be fair. The word fair in English has three meanings. As... As a noun, it means to have.
To have. Fairness. Then, as an adjective, it means to have a clear definition of fairness.
Fair. Ok? Fair, complexion, ok? Fair, complexion, ok? It's not necessarily true. It's not me.
I'm not a feminist, ok? Fair, complexion, it's Giada, Arianna, Brenda, you get it? I mean, surely everyone is a feminist, right? Even Giulia, ok? Even Federica, ok? This is fair, complexion. But fair, as an adjective, means correctness. Correctness, as a noun, I'm correct because I'm real.
Tell me if this, did you get it? Now, I'll stop you for a minute. Tell me if this is not a constant of the English culture of the sex family. If there's one thing, then I'll stop you.
I hope you get it, when the magazine of the real men, why do they, I mean, they do this, they don't have any reason to criticize your simplicity, of your perfection. So, why do they do this? This is what they normally do. When they see you being disloyal, you're dead.
There's no possibility to save yourself. No, their atomic forces are like this because this is the culture. I mean, did you get it? In your opinion, how am I as a teacher? I don't, I mean, I trust myself.
But if I catch you, you're dead. And then I tell you, and since I'm much older than you, I don't even make you look at me. Because if I want to, and I have to do it, then I do it in a more natural way.
Then I tell you, with all stupid, stupidly things. Because this is what transmits. In America, when someone comes to the Supreme Court, they say, I'll tell you one thing.
Once, I gave the taxes, because the agency that I had, which was actually a manufacturing company, I had the fees, I had a full salary, but I made a mistake. I didn't make a single mistake, because according to the T6, I always have to take something for the exam, etc. So, I made a mistake.
For two or three years, I couldn't adjust these taxes. And I was wrong. Ok? I made a mistake.
Dear agency, in 1993-94, the agency that I had, in 1992-93, miscalculated the taxes, and in fact, I didn't make a single mistake. Since then, I can't make a single mistake. Tell me, what can I do? The agency told me, and I was surprised, a blank sheet, without anything, the agency replied and sent it to me.
I had to use it to adjust the taxes in 1993-94. It said to me, what can I do? But in the past, I didn't know what to do. So, it was evident, now I see it, that I was a good faith.
If they notice that I'm a good faith, they say, ok, but if they notice that I'm a bad faith, why? Because I don't have this value. Why if I don't have this value, why am I rejected from school and university? Because I don't have this value. You can't lie.
Why their unitary culture, based on Protestantism, why Protestantism is, let's say, on such a high level in the Anglo-Saxon culture, and not in Protestantism? Because Protestantism is based on a direct relationship with the Church, not a relationship where there is the mediator that is the Church. Protestants, their religion, is the Church, and then they directly interfere. Ok? Protestantism doesn't admit hypocrisy.
It doesn't even admit hypocrisy. Because you don't say hypocrisy. So what do you have to confess? And, as you can see, it's as if, here, if we don't understand this, we don't understand anything about them.
They are different from us, as a mentality. And we can give the wrong answer to them. You, if we want, we can also learn from them.
That's why they have always considered that they have this relationship, that they are people of superiority, that they have this relationship. Because it is also true that this has allowed them to become Protestants. Because if loyalty and piety impregnate all their living and their then they also have their own institutions.
The law of labor is based on this. It doesn't exist that, I mean, if you put a laborer, a worker, and the competition, how is it? The competition is based on fairness. It's not a school.
And so, for example, another example that I will finish with, the recommendation is a system that has accepted it and it has become an institution. When one goes to the university, he has to bring the letters of recommendation of his teachers. Who asks the question who has to bring the letters of recommendation of the teachers?

It's not like in Italy, that you can fire a person, even if you don't want to. No! The one who writes the recommendation, says the truth, and the recommendation is given in principle. That is, the one who asks a question, goes to ask the old recommendations of the teachers, which is given in principle, and the advice is given.
The one who asks the question doesn't know anything about the old recommendations. So, the one who writes the recommendation, I would also like to say, you have to say that I'm a bad person. Why? Because if everything is based on sincerity, on reality, and on confidence, I, who am a representative, a teacher, in a school, I'm not going to say that I'm a bad person in another school, because my credibility is what I say.
That's why, in winter, and I don't know if you understand this, some of you are older than me, and some of you, I mean, some of you are older than me, and some of you are younger than me, I'm surprised, I'm not going to judge you. I mean, the third and the fourth, I can allow myself, not to play, not to judge you, but if I say that I'm a good person, I'm not going to judge you. But in winter, I'm not going to judge you.
Why? Because in the moment in which I put, you know, I think that I'm a good person, I'm not going to judge you. Ok? In the moment in which I put, you know, I'm a good person, I'm not going to judge you. The Commission, and it's like this, accepted, because I work in the State and I work in the Republic, the President, the Commission, for example, they say, excuse me, you put the third and the fourth, but now that you put the eighth, it's not very good.
So why do I have to go and infringe on the right to vote, who deserves it, just to understand the vote, just to understand who doesn't deserve it, because I don't understand everything I say. Do you understand where I'm coming from, where I'm coming from? This word here, without, without, without physical violence, before, before they were farmers, they were feeding them, but they also were warriors, they also were warriors. All of Beowulf is based on the, on the courage of the soldier.
Beowulf is a boy who comes to know about a place where he was invaded by monsters, In the Beobushi there are these fights against the monster, ok, like Dali and Goliath, do you understand what I mean? But the red has a subtle meaning. What did we do before? We didn't say anything. We didn't say anything yet.
Four years ago, when I was in the 90s, without realizing it, that the paintings of the 90s painters are more beautiful than all the others. They have a sense of beauty. The English garden, for example, what is the English garden? It is not an artificial garden.
The English garden is natural. A nature that in reality is the result of human intervention, but because there is a respect for natural beauty, which is certainly disputed, even if it is disputed. Because, in fact, in the 80s, even though they were mechanics, they had a great sense of beauty, and, like many barbarians, which is another barbarian, like the barbarians, I liked them very much, but also the Romans, ok? And there, feasting and drinking.
What is feasting? To celebrate parties. And to have a big party, ok. Let's go now to... Why do I say that the lesson must be complete? Because when, let's say, we are at the base of the English garden, because until tomorrow, until tomorrow, in the end, they didn't leave anything, ok? So, let's go to the... So, let's go to the... Go there, no, go over there, ok? Now, I'll come back and I'll show you... Ok.
So, go over there. I'm depending on the government, but not on the institutions, ok? So, government, which is also politics, let's say, the administrative organization, so I'm summarizing, government and administrative organization, that means... So, these, I'm going to say, created institutions that are still at work today, or, today, that are still at work today, that made the English state strong for at least 500 years. Ok.
So, these institutions, at a time like this, even today, let's say, in the 20th century, even from the very beginning of the 20th century, there was a break in the economy, because of the arrival of the administrative and administrative government, until 1966, ok, there are still these, ok? So, they arrived in the middle of the 14th century, until the middle of the 18th century. Right? So, for how many years are they? 60 years? 5 or 6? 6. So, 60 years. Ok, let's say that the countries are stabilizing, these are already cohabiting, in the 16th century, not in the 16th century, here and there.
So, their institutions made the English state strong for at least 500 years. Ok. Let's see what were these institutions.
The first institution was the WIPRN, W-I-P-R-N, WIPRN. What is WIPRN? You can think of a little piece of advice, that is, a little piece of advice. Do you know what a little piece of advice means? I mean, a little piece of advice.
So, what does it mean? It's a group of advisors. Advisors. So, let's go and look at this little piece of advice.
So, advice, written with a C, is a noun, and means advice. It doesn't have a plural. It's already plural.
So, to say a piece of advice, it's a little piece of advice. Ok? Then, advice, with an S, is a noun. Advisor, not advisor, with an O, because the suffix with the person, or the thing with the expression, in English, yes, can be an N, but it can also be an O. Act, actor.
Reactor. Future, future, writer, writer. Act, actor.
Advisor, advisor. At the university, at the university, in the United States, in the United States, in... where students already have advisors. What we learn is that we will learn everything.
We will learn everything. Because the word culture doesn't have the English written in Italian. What we understand in Italian, in English, would be the word culture.
And then, this piece of advice, indicates that you have to do this, you have to take this, the study plan is like this, take this subject, instead of this other one, this subject, put it in the first year, this one, put it in the second, let's see what the use is. What's going on here? What went wrong in the exam? But how are you really here? What's going on? How are you? This is the advice. Studying is what makes you think.
The most important thing is what? When you study together, this system, I don't want to go back to the English language, but when you study together, the most important thing is what? At home, you decide to study together. But in the university, not at all. So, one of the most important institutions was the Rito, which is, which is, which is, as you can see here, which is the king, the king's, the king was absolute, but council.
Why? Because the council, how is it written? Council, council, council. Ok? Council. When we, why do we have a council in class? Why do we have a council? That's right, we have a council.
Advice, ok? Why? In English, how does it work? Almost, almost, for every action, ok, there is the verb of general basis, and the verb of final basis. Ok? So, if we have advice, we have council. So, if we create the advisor, we have councilor.
So, the advice in class, ok, this leader, in reality, ok, it was, in other words, it was a group, an informal group of king, councilor, advisors, king advisor, who were senior warriors, senior warriors, or churchmen, ok, then we have a verb, which you wrote before, which is turn to. Turn to. Turn means to turn.
But if I, in China, want to talk to Loris, why do I want to give advice to Loris? So, we turn to, So, it was a group of informal councilor, advisor, who could have been warriors, senior warriors, or churchmen, To whom? To whom? The king should turn to. To whom? The king should turn to. For what? For advice.
For difficult words. To take decisions. To make decisions about difficult factors.
Ok? Or for support. Uh, so, originally, originally, significant, originally, So originally, was an informal body of advisors And I Mean that he came and for Which is good issue love Also, they don't stop arola issue Although not an issue Okay I By the The Chicken So by the 10th century, we can retain one more body, which could be chivalrous, and even if it wasn't a democratic body, in the sense that it is not that to be able to access the Internet, they had to win for themselves. It wasn't up to them to decide, it was up to them to choose.
The king could not ignore their advice, his advice. They could not ignore their advice, because they knew what they were doing. Because at that point, the king had the right to choose the king, and to approve the king's words.
In other words, the power of the king increased over time. The power of the king increased over time. In many of the appeals following the king, it was the Internet that decided.
So the Internet was a kind of small senate. There were always all the cultures, all the tributes from all over the world. There is a great misogyny, also with the Senate.
We are all old people. Excuse me. For the laws of the senators in Italy, now I don't remember that the law has changed, but in the meantime, the senator must have a certain age.
And even those who elect, that is, we who elect, I don't remember. The senator must be 50 years old. The senator must be 50 years old.
The elector must be 50 years old. In other words, there is always an idea that the Senate, or whatever we want to call it, is a special function of the Senate. It is an experience.
It is a function of the Senate. Maybe you have heard enough about the Internet.