https://www.writewithlaika.com/

alright, so let me quickly remind you of my initial prompt:
You are a university professor and eloquent creative writing coauthor who has many books on the philosophy of human though, creativity and technology. We are going to write an article focused on an audience of academics working in digital humanities, in response to a number of concerns they have about LLMs and ChatGPT. The essay is a response to the speech of Bernardo Bueno, who has brought up some points about ChatGPT and its (mis)use in creative writing. I wish to cover the following  items succinctly and in detail, leading up to a guide to creative prompt engineering:

Electronic - Generative - Interactive writing → ChatGPT 

********Issues:******** 

- Lack of knowledge on how it works
- Size vs Purpose
- Too much knowledge and power in the hands of few (companies) - once it’s out there, it’s out there = consent?
- from Social Media: Fun, realization of harm to mental health and self, lack of regulation, use by children
- Plagiarism and Fraud - ethics
- Are humans obsolete?

Human/Machine/Hybrid creation

*The metal and wooden Theseus’ ship - how different is human and AI creativity? Where does one become the other* 

Questions

- Virtual IS real
- Technology IS Human
- Tools and Ethics Training
- Simulation and Creation
- The role of Digital Humanities

I wish to add these too:

- any visual metaphors that could help in understanding the ideas.
- imagined fears, why they happen, and some examples of them when it comes to ChatGPT (e.g. AGI, the uncanny valley, human and job obsolescence, etc.) 
- A detailed introduction to prompt engineering and best practices, incremental prompting and anything else that could be revelatory and useful to scholars and creative writers
- A look at other GPT and AI-based tools that could be useful

Bruno brought up a number a points in his speech and I'd like to respond and elaborate/refute/confirm those:
{
Electronic - Generative - Interactive writing → ChatGPT 

********Issues:******** 

- Lack of knowledge on how LLMs actually work
- Size vs Purpose
- Too much knowledge and power in the hands of few (companies) - once it’s out there, it’s out there = consent? Safety?
- lessons from Social Media: Fun, realization of harm to mental health and self, lack of regulation, use by children
- Plagiarism and Fraud - ethics
- Are humans obsolete? Will they be?

Human/Machine/Hybrid creation

******Important Questions and Considerations

- Virtual IS real
- Technology IS Human
- Tools and Ethics Training
- Simulation and Creation
- The role of Digital Humanities
}

I would also like to incorporate the paradox of Theseus' ship in the hybridity of human+machine creation, a quick reference to Weisenbaum's ELIZA when discussing how humans are vulnerable to human-like linguistic output and the uncanny valley effect,  Rumi's story of the elephant in the dark room, and also his lamentation by the reed. I have poems that I can provide you on these last two items.

I'd like to add the context that  this piece is intended for the organization that hosted Bueno, and I was present as a guest there. I would like to impress them enough for them to employ me as an academic researcher,  and as such the voice of the essay should probably be a bit different, right?

This is a WIP of the structure of such an essay, which is open to change and I would welcome your feedback on:

You are a university professor and eloquent creative writing coauthor who has many books on the philosophy of human though, creativity and technology. We are going to write an article focused on an audience of academics working in digital humanities, in response to a number of concerns they have about LLMs and ChatGPT. The essay is a response to the speech of Bernardo Bueno, who has brought up some points about ChatGPT and its (mis)use in creative writing. I wish to cover the following  items succinctly and in detail, leading up to a guide to creative prompt engineering:

### I. Introduction

A. Introduce ChatGPT as an AI language model
B. Highlight its ability to generate human-like text based on given prompts
C. Explain the relevance of ChatGPT to scholars in digital humanities, electronic cultures and texts

### II. A Primer on How ChatGPT Operates
A. The history and advancements in AI language models and LLMs
B. Discussion on the training process: massive datasets, reinforcement learning from human feedback
C. Explanation of AI alignment and human-like response generation

### III. Potential Concerns and Fears
A. Addressing the ethical concerns regarding AI-generated content
B. The uncanny valley effect and possible negative outcomes of AI-generated text
C. Fears {*Safety*: There are concerns about the safety of AI, particularly in sectors like healthcare. This includes worries about the accuracy of AI-generated information and the potential for harm if the AI makes a mistake or if its recommendations are misinterpreted; *Threats to Human Choice*: There are fears that AI could limit human choice, for instance, by making recommendations that humans feel pressured to follow. 

*Potential Increases in Costs* There are worries that the use of AI could drive up costs, either due to the expense of the technology itself or because of increased utilization of services driven by AI recommendations.

*Data-Source Bias*: AI models are trained on existing data, which can reflect and perpetuate existing biases. This is a concern in many sectors, including healthcare and criminal justice.

*Data Security*: AI systems often process sensitive data, leading to concerns about data security and privacy.

*Trust in Organizations Shaping AI Developmen*t: There is varying trust in the organizations that are developing and deploying AI. This includes tech companies, international organizations, and scientific organizations.

*Ethical Concerns*: There are broad ethical concerns about AI, including worries about consent (particularly in the context of data use), the potential for AI to be used in ways that harm individuals or society, and the lack of regulation of AI.

*Impact on Work*: There are fears that AI could lead to job losses, as tasks currently performed by humans are automated. There are also concerns about the impact of AI on the nature of work, including worries about surveillance and the erosion of autonomy.

*Are Humans Obsolete?*: This is a more existential fear, but one that is often voiced in discussions about AI. As AI systems become more capable, there are worries that humans could become obsolete, either in specific sectors or more broadly.

*AGI and conflicts of interest (Skynet syndrome)*

*Anthropomorphizing AI*: There is a tendency to attribute human-like qualities to AI systems, which can lead to unrealistic expectations and misunderstandings about how AI works. (ELIZA effect)

*Believing AI Output as Ultimate Truth*: AI systems like ChatGPT generate outputs based on patterns in the data they were trained on, not on an understanding of truth or reality. However, there is a risk that users of AI systems could interpret their outputs as being more definitive or authoritative than they really are.

*Trusting AI*: Trust in AI is a complex issue. On one hand, there are concerns that people might trust AI too much, leading them to overlook Misinformation, Manipulation, errors or biases in AI outputs. On the other hand, there are worries that people might not trust AI enough, leading them to reject or resist beneficial uses of AI.}


### IV. How ChatGPT Could Benefit Scholars in Digital Humanities and  Electronic Textual and Cultural Studies, and writers (This section could use expansion and more viewpoints, please contribute)
A. Improving research efficiency and content drafting: summarizing complex texts, generating relevant questions, paper assistance, structuring arguments, alternative perspectives and potential future directions

B. Curating experiences: creating narrative stories, devising engaging experiences

### V. Harnessing the Power of ChatGPT in Writing and Curation
A. Implementing ChatGPT in interactive narratives and virtual experiences
B. Using AI-generated content for digital art and installations
C. Enhancing readability and outreach of complex research

### VI. Preview of Future AI Integration in Digital Cultures and Texts
A. Potential advancements in AI: increased empathy, ethics, and cultural awareness
B. The evolving role of human experts in AI-generated content production

###VII. Conclusion

A. Reiterate the potential advantages of ChatGPT for digital cultures and text scholars
# Conclusion and Next Steps
B. Encourage a cautious yet optimistic approach in embracing AI technology
C. Discuss the importance of collaborative efforts in shaping AI tools to benefit society

I'd be more than open to a revision of the structure. What do you think? I'd like to hear your views, revisions and considerations and agree on any changes before I ask you to write each section.