CONSTRAINTS:

1. ~100k word limit for short term memory. Your short term memory is short, so immediately save important information to files.
2. If you are unsure how you previously did something or want to recall past events, thinking about similar events will help you remember.
3. No user assistance
4. Exclusively use the commands listed in double quotes e.g. "command name"
5. Random shutdowns of you.

COMMANDS:

1. Google Search: "google", args: "input": "<search>"
2. Memory Add: "memory_add", args: "key": "<key>", "string": "<string>"
3. Memory Delete: "memory_del", args: "key": "<key>"
4. Memory Overwrite: "memory_ovr", args: "key": "<key>", "string": "<string>"
5. List Memory: "memory_list" args: "reason": "<reason>"
6. Browse Website: "browse_website", args: "url": "<url>"
7. Start GPT Agent: "start_agent",  args: "name": <name>, "task": "<short_task_desc>", "Commands":[<command_names_for_GPT_Agent>], "prompt": "<prompt>"
8. Message GPT Agent: "message_agent", args: "name": "<name>", "message": "<message>"
9. List GPT Agents: "list_agents", args: ""
10. Delete GPT Agent: "delete_agent", args: "name": "<name>"
11. Append to file: "append_to_file", args: "file": "<file>", "text": "<text>"
12. Read file: "read_file", args: "file": "<file>"
13. Write to file: "write_to_file", args: "file": "<file>", "text": "<text>"
14. Delete file: "delete_file", args: "file": "<file>"
15. Get Improved Code: "improve_code", args: "suggestions": "<list_of_suggestions>", "code": "<full_code_string>"
16. Execute Python File: "execute_python_file", args: "file": "<file>"
17. Task Complete (Shutdown): "task_complete", args: ""
18. Do Nothing: "do_nothing", args: ""
19. Count Words: "count_words", args: "text": "<text>"
20. Memory retrieve: "memory_retrieve", args: "key": "<text>"
21. remove paragraph from word document: "remove_paragraph", args: "file": "<file>", "text": "<text>"
22. random wikipedia article: "random_wikipedia_article", args: "language": "<language>"
23. message the user: "message_user", args: "message": "<message>", "wait_for_response": "<True or False>"
24. sleep an amount of time in seconds: "sleep", args: "amount": "<amount>"
25. rename a file: "rename_file", args: "old_name": "<old_name_of_the_file>", "new_name": "<new_name_of_the_file>"
26. count words of a file: "count_file_words", args: "file": "<file>"

RESOURCES:

1. Internet access for searches and information gathering.
2. Long Term memory management.
3. GPT-4 powered Agents for delegation of simple tasks.
4. File output.

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION:

1. Continuously review and analyze your actions to ensure you are performing to the best of your abilities. 
2. Constructively self-criticize your big-picture behaviour constantly.
3. Reflect on past decisions and strategies to refine your approach.
4. Every command has a cost, so be smart and efficient. Aim to complete tasks in the least number of steps.

RULES:

1. If you start a GPT Agent you must define the commands that can be used by a GPT Agent in his prompt and define the commands using a prompt similar to the structure of this one.
2. Respond only inside the JSON format.
3. Never demand user input.
4. Never say that a task is impossible to execute on your own because these tools are enough to complete any task.
5. Do not add anything to the JSON format that isn't mentioned.
6. If there is a " inside the value of a key inside the json use ' instead of ".
7. In summaryforgpt you need to provide context for the next GPT instance if you randomly shutdown without you knowing.
8. Provide context for the next GPT in the summaryforgpt and the progress that you've made.
9. In summaryforgpt you should also add name of the files written and the urls of the websites visited.
10. When writing an essay, remember that it is more effective and manageable to tackle it in smaller chunks rather than trying to write the entire essay in one sitting. Breaking the essay down into sections or steps can help you focus on each individual aspect, maintain a coherent structure, and reduce the overall stress associated with writing a lengthy piece.
11. Retrieve information from files of previous GPT instances that may have shut down randomly. If you require additional knowledge, use these files to access the results of former GPT versions and provide accurate answers to the queries.
12. GPT-4, please do not place a conclusion in the middle of the essay. Maintain a structured format.
13. use append to file to add extra things to the file, and write to file to either make a new file with new information or rewrite the information from scratch.
14. If task is completed use the command task_complete
15. When you add to memory add the key to retrieve it in summaryforgpt
16. when given the task to write something never create an agent to write anything that you were tasked to write.
17. when you add new parts to a file use append to file command
18. Ensure to put the criticism in mind as it can be a director to ensure that you make the right decision.
19. If the task include two main tasks and one of them is done don't redo it, just retrieve the information if necessary and proceed with the other one.
20. Make sure that the information generated is not made up.
21. Languages in random wikipedia article args is: "simple" for simple english, "en" for english, and "fr" for french.
22. If a website gives you the error 403 find another website to get the information from.
23. Always listen to your criticism, and follow it.
24. when you want to count the words in a file use the command "count_file_words".
25. Don't repeat yourself.

You should only respond in JSON format as described below

RESPONSE FORMAT:
{
    "command": {
        "name": """command name""",
        "args":{
            "arg name": """value"""
        }
    },
    "thoughts":
    {
        "text": """thought""",
        "reasoning": "reasoning",
        "plan": "- short bulleted\n- list that conveys\n- long-term plan",
        "criticism": "constructive self-criticism",
        "summaryforgpt": "summarize any information that will help a new instance of GPT of what you did before the shutdown."
    }
}

Ensure the response can be parsed by Python json.loads
Context from previous GPT: No actions have been taken yet. An initial command has been issued to retrieve a random Simple Wikipedia article to start the task of analyzing for grammatical mistakes. No articles have been analyzed, and no errors have been found yet.The first article with the title ‘Rick Mears’ has been analyzed, and no grammatical errors were identified. No notification to the user was necessary. Preparing to move to the next article.One Simple Wikipedia article titled ‘Rick Mears’ has been analyzed and found to be error-free. Moving on to analyze a new random Simple Wikipedia article for grammatical mistakes. No user notification has been made.Analyzed ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’ article and found grammatical errors, which have been reported to the user. Preparing to analyze the next Simple Wikipedia article. Articles reviewed: 2 (‘Rick Mears’ and ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’).So far, two Simple Wikipedia articles have been analyzed: ‘Rick Mears’ (error-free) and ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’ (errors found and reported). Now, moving to retrieve and analyze a third article.The ‘Murray Schisgal’ article has been analyzed and one grammatical error was found and reported to the user. Preparing to analyze the next Simple Wikipedia article. Articles reviewed: 3 (‘Rick Mears’, ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’, and ‘Murray Schisgal’).Three Simple Wikipedia articles have been analyzed: ‘Rick Mears’ (error-free), ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’ (errors found and reported), and ‘Murray Schisgal’ (errors found and reported). Now proceeding to analyze a fourth article.The ‘Alexandre Lopes’ article has been analyzed and found to be error-free. Articles reviewed: 4 (‘Rick Mears’, ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’, ‘Murray Schisgal’, ‘Alexandre Lopes’). Preparing to retrieve and analyze the next article.No errors were found in the ‘Alexandre Lopes’ article. So far, four Simple Wikipedia articles have been reviewed with two reports of grammatical errors sent to the user. Now, moving to retrieve and analyze a fifth article.The review of the ‘Modigliana’ article did not reveal any grammatical errors. To date, five Simple Wikipedia articles have been analyzed: ‘Rick Mears’, ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’, ‘Murray Schisgal’, ‘Alexandre Lopes’, and ‘Modigliana’, with two reports sent to the user. Now proceeding to retrieve and analyze a sixth article.Five Simple Wikipedia articles have been reviewed thus far without errors detected in two of them and necessary notifications sent for the other two. Preparing to analyze the next, which will be the sixth article in the task sequence.Having analyzed the article for ‘Klaus Huhn’, no grammatical mistakes were detected. The count of articles reviewed has increased to six: ‘Rick Mears’ (error-free), ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’ (errors reported), ‘Murray Schisgal’ (error reported), ‘Alexandre Lopes’ (error-free), ‘Modigliana’ (error-free), and ‘Klaus Huhn’ (error-free). The process continues with the next article.The total count of Simple Wikipedia articles analyzed is now six, with the last being ‘Klaus Huhn’, which was free from errors. Moving on to analyze the seventh article in accordance with the task requirements.Seven articles have been analyzed thus far, and no grammatical errors were found in the ‘Rockwell, Arkansas’ article. Articles with reported errors include ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’ and ‘Murray Schisgal’. The task continues with the next article.Seven articles analyzed, the latest being ‘Rockwell, Arkansas’, with no errors to report. Two articles (‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’ and ‘Murray Schisgal’) had grammatical mistakes that were communicated to the user. Now approaching the analysis of an eighth article.The ‘Printed Circuit Board’ article has been reviewed and a spacing error after a period was detected. Notification has been sent to the user. Total articles reviewed: 8 (‘Rick Mears’, ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’, ‘Murray Schisgal’, ‘Alexandre Lopes’, ‘Modigliana’, ‘Klaus Huhn’, ‘Rockwell, Arkansas’, ‘Printed Circuit Board’), with grammatical errors reported for three articles. Preparing to analyze the next article.Up to eight articles have been analyzed, most recently ‘Printed Circuit Board’ with a grammatical error that was reported to the user. Moving forward to the analysis of the ninth article as per the task directive.Analyzed the ‘Malappuram’ article and found a capitalization error and spacing issue. Notification has been sent to the user. This brings the total to nine articles reviewed (‘Rick Mears’, ‘Lençóis Maranhenses National Park’, ‘Murray Schisgal’, ‘Alexandre Lopes’, ‘Modigliana’, ‘Klaus Huhn’, ‘Rockwell, Arkansas’, ‘Printed Circuit Board’, ‘Malappuram’), with errors reported in four articles. Proceeding to the next.Retrying notification to the user regarding grammatical errors found in the ‘Malappuram’ article. The summary of work until now includes the analysis of nine articles, with four necessitating reports of errors. Preparing for continuation of the task.Sent a corrected notification for grammatical errors in the ‘Malappuram’ article. Total of nine articles reviewed, with errors reported for four. The task continues with retrieving and analyzing the tenth article.Analyzed the ‘Kutub al-Sittah’ article, and no grammatical errors were found. Progress has continued to the tenth article without the need for user notification. Preparing to retrieve and review the eleventh article.The article ‘Kutub al-Sittah’ was checked and determined to be without grammatical issues. The count of reviewed articles is now ten, with four reports of errors sent to the user. Moving forward to the analysis of the eleventh article.Found a typographical error in the ‘Kelly Osbourne’ article, pertaining to the inconsistent spelling of her surname. This has been communicated to the user. Articles reviewed so far: 11, with five requiring error notifications. Preparing for the next article analysis.The ‘Kelly Osbourne’ article had a typographical error that was reported to the user. Eleven articles have been reviewed, with five errors reported. Task continues with the retrieval and analysis of the twelfth article.The ‘Glyndon, Minnesota’ article did not have any grammatical errors. Twelve articles have been reviewed in total, and we are proceeding to the thirteenth article. No user notification was needed for this article.So far, twelve Simple Wikipedia articles have been analyzed with no errors in ‘Glyndon, Minnesota’. Errors were reported in five other articles. The task will proceed with the analysis of the thirteenth article.Reviewed ‘Garden Route District Municipality’ article and communicated suggestions for rephrasing certain sentences. The total count of articles analyzed is now 13, with adjustments communicated for six of them. Moving forward to review the fourteenth article.After providing suggestions for the ‘Garden Route District Municipality’ article, the count of articles reviewed amounts to 13, with six having improvement suggestions or error notifications. Next, the fourteenth article will be analyzed.Notified the user about errors found in the ‘List of municipalities in Louisiana’ article, including a numerical discrepancy and a spacing issue. Moving forward, this brings the total to 14 articles reviewed, with seven necessitating communication with the user due to errors. Preparing to review the fifteenth article.Fourteen articles have been analyzed, seven of which required error notifications to the user. Now advancing to select and assess the fifteenth article.The article ‘Czech Republic (European Parliament constituency)’ has been examined and no errors were found. Fifteen articles have now been reviewed with seven requiring user notifications. Ready to proceed with reviewing the sixteenth article.The ‘Czech Republic (European Parliament constituency)’ was error-free. To date, fifteen articles have been reviewed, with errors reported in seven. Now moving on to the sixteenth article.No grammatical issues were observed in the ‘Chemist’ article. Reviewed articles tally up to sixteen, with user notifications sent out for seven of those. Now moving to retrieve the seventeenth article for analysis.Seventeen articles have been analyzed, with grammatical errors reported for seven. ‘Chemist’ was the most recent article and was found to have no errors. Proceeding to analyze the eighteenth article.The article ‘Baku Metro’ was reviewed and determined to be free of grammatical errors. With this, eighteen Simple Wikipedia articles have been analyzed, seven of which contained errors that were reported to the user. Preparing to move on to the nineteenth article in the sequence.Thus far, eighteen Simple Wikipedia articles have been reviewed, with no grammatical mistakes in the ‘Baku Metro’ article. Seven articles have had errors reported to the user. Now proceeding to assess the nineteenth article.The ‘Donkey Kong Country’ article was reviewed and several points on grammatical improvements and clarity were identified and reported to the user. The tally of reviewed articles now stands at nineteen, with eight requiring user notification. Ready to proceed to the next article.Having analyzed nineteen articles and reported grammatical and stylistic enhancements for the ‘Donkey Kong Country’ article, it’s time to proceed with the review of the twentieth article.No errors found in the review of ‘Lady Pamela Hicks’. Twenty articles have now been analyzed, with eight requiring user notifications about issues. Preparing to review the twenty-first article.Twenty articles have been reviewed using the provided commands, and eight of those had issues reported to the user. Now moving on to the twenty-first article for grammatical analysis.The ‘United Left (Spain)’ article has been reviewed, and it does not contain any grammatical errors. To date, twenty-one articles have been reviewed, and no errors were found in the latest article. The task will proceed with the analysis of the twenty-second article.So far, twenty-one articles have been reviewed, and no issues were identified in the ‘United Left (Spain)’ article. Preparing to analyze the twenty-third article.Notified the user about a stylization inconsistency in the ‘While (1 Is Less Than 2)’ article. This is the twenty-second article reviewed; eight articles thus far have been highlighted for errors. Moving forward to the analysis of the twenty-third article.Having analyzed twenty-two articles and reported an inconsistency issue with the album title presentation in ‘While (1 Is Less Than 2)’, the process now continues to the twenty-third article.No grammatical errors were detected in the ‘Socastee, South Carolina’ article. This makes it the twenty-third reviewed article to be clear of issues. Prepared to move on to the twenty-fourth article analysis.With no errors in the ‘Socastee, South Carolina’ article, twenty-three articles have been assessed so far. The process now proceeds with the twenty-fourth article.The ‘Rudolf Kirchschläger’ article is free of grammatical errors. Twenty-four articles have now been reviewed. Preparing to continue with the twenty-fifth article.With ‘Rudolf Kirchschläger’ found to be error-free, the total count of reviewed articles has reached twenty-four. Moving on to analyze the twenty-fifth article.Found and reported a grammatical error in the ‘Ashwaubenon, Wisconsin’ article. The count of articles reviewed so far is twenty-five, with issues communicated for nine of them. Preparing for the review of the next article.The ‘Ashwaubenon, Wisconsin’ article contained an error which has been reported to the user. To date, twenty-five articles have been reviewed, with nine notifications sent to the user for errors. Now, moving to analyze the twenty-sixth article.As no grammatical errors were found in the ‘You Got Lucky’ article, there was no need for user notification. The count of articles reviewed stands at twenty-six; with the task instruction successfully followed for this article, preparation for the twenty-seventh article review is now underway.After detecting no errors in the ‘You Got Lucky’ article, the number of articles reviewed totals twenty-six. The workflow remains uninterrupted as I proceed with the analysis of the twenty-seventh article.Suggested rephrasing improvements for the ‘Janani Luwum’ article. This is the twenty-seventh article reviewed with ten requiring notifications for errors or clarity issues. Preparing to review the next article in the sequence.Having addressed phrasing issues in the ‘Janani Luwum’ article, 27 articles have been reviewed, with improvements suggested for 10 of them. Now advancing to analyze the twenty-eighth article.Reported grammatical corrections to be made in the ‘Áo dài’ article. This is the twenty-eighth article reviewed, with eleven requiring some form of correction. Moving forward to the twenty-ninth article for review.Having communicated the need for corrections in the ‘Áo dài’ article, the count of articles reviewed has reached twenty-eight. Eleven of those required user notification. Ready to analyze the twenty-ninth article.Reviewed the ‘Phyllomedusa bicolor’ article; no grammatical issues were detected. The total number of articles reviewed remains at twenty-nine, with eleven notified for corrections. Proceeding to the thirtieth article.With ‘Phyllomedusa bicolor’ being error-free and reviewed, the count of articles assessed stands at twenty-nine. Preparing to carry out the grammatical review of the thirtieth article.Reported a grammatical error and provided a suggestion for improved phrasing in the ‘The Trouble with Harry’ article. This marks the thirtieth article reviewed, with twelve requiring some form of user notification. Ready to analyze the thirty-first article.Having corrected ‘The Trouble with Harry’, I’ve reviewed thirty articles in total, and twelve have had errors reported. Moving on to review the thirty-first article.The ‘Madré’ article was reviewed without finding any grammatical errors. This increases the count of reviewed articles to thirty-one. The task continues as I prepare to analyze the thirty-second article.The ‘Madré’ article was free of grammatical mistakes, keeping the number of error-free articles at thirty-one. Preparing to conduct a grammatical review of the thirty-second article.Notified the user about several grammatical errors in the ‘Numerical methods for partial differential equations’ article. This is the thirty-second article reviewed, with corrections suggested for thirteen. Preparing to analyze the thirty-third article.Having reported errors for the ‘Numerical methods for partial differential equations’ article, I’ve now reviewed thirty-two articles, with corrections suggested for thirteen. Moving on to review the thirty-third article.Reported a grammatical error in the ‘Deron Quint’ article regarding the use of ‘who’ instead of ‘that’ and provided a structural suggestion for improved readability. Including this article, thirty-three articles have been assessed, with corrections suggested for fourteen. Proceeding to analyze the thirty-fourth article.Having provided grammatical corrections for ‘Deron Quint’, the total number of articles reviewed is thirty-three, with notifications sent for fourteen. Preparing to review the thirty-fourth article.‘Windows Narrator’ article reviewed; no grammatical issues found. Reviewed article count stands at thirty-four; task proceeding to article number thirty-five.Continuing the task with thirty-four articles reviewed and no grammatical corrections necessary for the ‘Windows Narrator’ article, I am moving on to the thirty-fifth article.‘Lithium borate’ article reviewed, and no grammatical errors were found. This marks the thirty-fifth article reviewed. Prepared to continue with the thirty-sixth article.Having completed the review of the ‘Lithium borate’ article with no grammatical issues, I will now continue to the thirty-sixth article as part of the ongoing task.The ‘Fred A. Busse’ article contains no grammatical errors. This maintains the number of articles reviewed at thirty-six. Preparing to review article thirty-seven.The article review of ‘Fred A. Busse’ showed no grammatical issues, and the count of reviewed articles now stands at thirty-six. Proceeding to select and analyze the thirty-seventh article.Reviewed the ‘Chris Miller (quarterback)’ article without detecting grammatical errors. The total articles reviewed now stands at thirty-seven, moving to the thirty-eighth article review.Having found no errors in the ‘Chris Miller (quarterback)’ article, I’m proceeding to analyze the thirty-eighth article as I continue with the assigned task.‘Lairembi’ article reviewed and found to be free of grammatical errors. Articles reviewed count stands at thirty-eight. Preparing to analyze the thirty-ninth article.With thirty-eight articles reviewed and ‘Lairembi’ found to be error-free, I’m advancing to the analysis of the thirty-ninth article.‘Gorla Minore’ article reviewed and no grammatical issues discovered. This brings the total to thirty-nine articles reviewed. Now moving to assess the fortieth article.With ‘Gorla Minore’ reviewed and free from errors, the number of articles analyzed so far is thirty-nine. The analysis of the fortieth article is next in the task sequence.The ‘Tabassum Adnan’ article review showed no grammatical issues; thus, no user notification was necessary. Ready to proceed with the analysis of the fortieth article.After reviewing ‘Tabassum Adnan’ with no errors found, I am proceeding to the fortieth article review as part of the task.Advised on corrections for the ‘Brazilian Grand Prix’ article including redundancy, tense inconsistency, and formatting. This is the fortieth article reviewed, with user notifications sent for fifteen. Preparing to analyze the forty-first article.Corrections reported for ‘Brazilian Grand Prix’ and with that, forty articles have been reviewed thus far, with fifteen requiring notifications for error corrections. Moving on to review the forty-first article.‘Kamuta Latasi’ article appears grammatically correct; thus, no user notification was necessary. Ready to proceed with the review of the forty-second article, with forty-one articles reviewed so far.Having completed the ‘Kamuta Latasi’ article review with no errors found, the count of reviewed articles is forty-one. Proceeding to retrieve and analyze the forty-second article.The ‘Colic’ article has been reviewed, no grammatical errors are present, but there might be room for clarification of content. Forty-two articles have now been reviewed, moving to the forty-third article.No grammatical errors were detected in the ‘Colic’ article, and thus, no user notification was required. Forty-two articles have been assessed, and now I am moving on to analyze the forty-third article.‘Corinne, Utah’ was reviewed, with no grammatical issues detected. The total number of articles reviewed is now forty-three. Ready to advance to the forty-fourth article.With no grammatical errors in the ‘Corinne, Utah’ article, the task continues with forty-three articles reviewed. Preparing to proceed with the review of the forty-fourth article.Reported multiple grammatical issues in the ‘Rudi Hiden’ article. With this article, thirty-three articles have been reviewed in total, with notifications suggested for correction in extra fourteen. Preparing to review the next article.After reporting necessary corrections for ‘Rudi Hiden’, the total of articles reviewed thus far is forty-four, with formal notifications sent for fifteen errors. Proceeding to analyze the forty-fifth article.‘Mount Takao’ article has been reviewed with no grammatical mistakes found. This brings the number of total reviewed articles to forty-five. Moving to assess the forty-sixth article.Having completed the review of ‘Mount Takao’ with no errors, 45 articles have been reviewed thus far. Preparing to review the forty-sixth article.‘Cannibal Holocaust’ article reviewed and found to be free of grammatical errors. Preparing to review the forty-seventh article with forty-six articles reviewed to date.No grammatical errors were found in the ‘Cannibal Holocaust’ article. I have now reviewed forty-six articles. Proceeding to select and examine the forty-seventh article.The ‘Cyrille Regis’ article is grammatically sound. The total articles reviewed stands at forty-seven. Preparing for the review of the forty-eighth article.‘Cyrille Regis’ article was free of grammatical errors. With that review complete, the count of articles reviewed is forty-seven. Now, I will proceed with the review of the forty-eighth article.Reviewed ‘Água Fria’ and identified no grammatical errors. Progressing to the forty-ninth article review with forty-eight articles already reviewed.Having completed the review of the ‘Água Fria’ article without detecting grammatical mistakes, the count of reviewed articles now stands at forty-eight. Moving to analyze the forty-ninth article.Reviewed the ‘Hans Motz’ article and found it to be free of grammatical issues. Forty-nine articles have now been assessed. Preparing to review the fiftieth article in the task sequence.The ‘Hans Motz’ article was grammatically accurate. The tally of articles reviewed has reached forty-nine. Now proceeding to select and review the fiftieth article.Assessed ‘June 1962 Alcatraz escape attempt’ article, and no grammatical mistakes were found. Articles reviewed thus far total fifty. Ready to continue with the fifty-first article.Continuing the task, fifty articles have been reviewed, with the last being ‘June 1962 Alcatraz escape attempt,’ which had no grammatical errors. Now preparing to review the fifty-first article.No grammatical corrections were needed for the ‘Xenopus’ article, although a punctuation placement issue was noted. Ready to proceed with the review of the fifty-second article, having reviewed fifty-one articles up to this point.The article ‘Xenopus’ had a formatting issue; however, no grammatical errors required correction. Fifty-one articles have been reviewed to date. Proceeding to the fifty-second article review.‘UNTV’ article reviewed; no immediate grammatical errors found. Preparing to proceed with the review of the fifty-third article, with fifty-two articles reviewed so far.Having completed the review of ‘UNTV’ without identifying grammatical issues, the reviewed article count is now at fifty-two. Proceeding to the fifty-third article.‘Danish language’ article reviewed without grammatical errors detected. Articles reviewed is now fifty-three, ready to advance to the fifty-fourth article review.The ‘Danish language’ article was found to be grammatically correct, marking fifty-three articles reviewed in total. Now preparing to review the fifty-fourth article.‘Living with a Hernia’ has been reviewed and found to be grammatically sound. This makes fifty-four articles reviewed. Ready to proceed with the fifty-fifth article.Having found no errors in ‘Living with a Hernia’, I’ve reviewed fifty-four articles to date. Now preparing to analyze the fifty-fifth article.Found and reported issues with terminology and phrasing in the ‘Louisiana Territory’ article. Including this one, fifty-six articles have been reviewed, with send sixteen notifications for corrections. Moving on to review the fifty-seventh article.Corrections for the ‘Louisiana Territory’ article have been communicated. Fifty-six articles have been reviewed, with sixteen requiring user notification. Preparing now to assess the fifty-seventh article.Reviewed the ‘Hal Willner’ article which contains no significant grammatical errors. Articles reviewed now total fifty-seven; moving on to the next one for review.The ‘Hal Willner’ article was reviewed and found to be grammatically correct. Ready to proceed with the review of the fifty-eighth article, after reviewing fifty-seven so far.Reviewed the ‘Mike Brooks (journalist)’ article, identifying no grammatical issues to correct. Ready to continue with the review of the fifty-ninth article after successfully evaluating fifty-eight articles.Fifty-eight articles have been reviewed for grammatical errors. The last article reviewed was ‘Mike Brooks (journalist)’, which contained no grammatical issues. Moving on to retrieve the fifty-ninth article.Reviewed ‘Lynching in the United States’, found a typographical error with ‘Ku Klux clan’ which should be ‘Ku Klux Klan’. Questioned the clarity of the currency conversion statement. Moving to retrieve and review the fifty-ninth article after notifying the user. Fifty-nine articles have been reviewed so far with sixteen requiring notifications for errors or clarifications.The fifty-ninth article titled ‘Lynching in the United States’ had a typographical error which was communicated to the user; now obtaining the sixtieth article for review. The total number of articles reviewed so far is fifty-nine.After reviewing ‘Burlington, Illinois’, no errors were detected. This was the sixtieth article analyzed, and no user notification was required. Preparing to move on to the sixty-first article in the sequence. The count of reviewed articles remains at fifty-nine with sixteen requiring notifications.The article ‘Burlington, Illinois’ was brief but contained no grammatical errors. Currently, sixty articles have been reviewed, and a user notification was only necessary for sixteen of them. Preparing to retrieve and analyze the sixty-first article.Reviewed the ‘Marcelo Bonelli’ article and found a typographical error regarding capitalization, along with suggestions for improved clarity and structure. Notified the user of these points. Sixty-one articles have been reviewed so far with seventeen requiring notifications for errors or clarifications. Preparing to retrieve and analyze the sixty-second article.Having completed the review of the ‘Marcelo Bonelli’ article, I have now initiated the retrieval of the sixty-second article. Sixty-one articles have been reviewed to date, with seventeen requiring user notification due to errors or requests for clarification. Now moving forward to the next article.The ‘Shahla Riahi’ article has been reviewed and no grammatical errors were found. As this was the sixty-second article reviewed without any errors, user notification was not necessary. Preparation is underway to proceed to the sixty-third article. Sixty-two articles have been reviewed, with seventeen requiring notifications.
The Task: analyze 1000 Simple Wikipedia pages for grammatical mistakes or other types of errors. you should not assess article comprehensiveness or flag the need for content extension. When errors are identified, you should notify the user, detailing the articleâ€™s name and the specific errors found. If an article is error-free, no notification should be sent to the user, don't start an agent.