System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
You will be required to write a few questions from the given company's interview section.
Input: Kohl's

[Ground truth Answer]
- Why do you want to work at kohls? 
- If you were helping a customer and another interrupted you, what would you do? 
- What’s your availability? 
- What do you think is the most important aspect of working in a retail store? 
- What’s a reasonable reason for not showing up at work?

[Assistant's Response]
When preparing for an interview at Kohl's, it's important to anticipate questions that assess both your customer service skills and your alignment with the company's values. Here are several potential interview questions you might encounter:

1. **Customer Service Excellence**: "Can you describe a time when you provided excellent customer service? What steps did you take to ensure the customer was satisfied?"

2. **Task Prioritization**: "How do you prioritize tasks during a busy shift? Can you provide an example of how you managed multiple responsibilities?"

3. **Company Values Alignment**: "What do you know about Kohl's values, and how do they align with your own personal values and work ethic?"

4. **Handling Difficult Situations**: "How would you handle a difficult customer? Can you share a specific experience where you successfully resolved a customer complaint?"

5. **Team Collaboration**: "Can you give an example of how you worked as part of a team to achieve a common goal? What role did you play in that situation?"

6. **Adaptability**: "Describe a situation where you had to adapt to a significant change at work. How did you handle it?"

7. **Sales Techniques**: "What strategies do you use to encourage customers to make purchases? Can you provide an example of a successful sales experience?"

8. **Feedback Reception**: "How do you handle constructive criticism? Can you share an instance when feedback helped you improve your performance?"

These questions are designed to help interviewers gauge your skills, experience, and fit for the Kohl's team. Preparing thoughtful responses to these questions will enhance your chances of making a positive impression during your interview.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: