System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
A group of five friends are going to watch a movie together. They have to choose between three genres: comedy, horror, and action. Each friend has a different preference for the genre. Here are some clues to help you figure out their preferences:

Alice likes comedy more than horror, but less than action.
Bob likes horror more than comedy, but less than action.
Carol likes action more than horror, but less than comedy.
David likes comedy more than action, but less than horror.
Eve likes horror more than action, but less than comedy.
What is the order of preference for each friend from most to least liked genre? Write your answer using the following format: Friend: Genre > Genre > Genre

[Ground truth Answer]
Alice: Action > Comedy > Horror
Bob: Action > Horror > Comedy
Carol: Comedy > Action > Horror
David: Horror > Comedy > Action
Eve: Comedy > Horror > Action

[Assistant's Response]
Based on the clues provided regarding each friend's preferences for the movie genres (comedy, horror, and action), we can deduce the order of their preferences as follows:

1. **Alice**: Since she likes action more than comedy and horror, her order is:
   - Action > Comedy > Horror

2. **Bob**: He prefers action over horror and horror over comedy, leading to:
   - Action > Horror > Comedy

3. **Carol**: She enjoys comedy more than action but less than horror, which gives her preference as:
   - Comedy > Horror > Action

4. **David**: He likes horror more than comedy but less than action, resulting in:
   - Action > Horror > Comedy

5. **Eve**: She prefers comedy over horror, but horror over action, so her order is:
   - Comedy > Horror > Action

Summarizing the preferences, we have:

- **Alice**: Action > Comedy > Horror
- **Bob**: Action > Horror > Comedy
- **Carol**: Comedy > Horror > Action
- **David**: Action > Horror > Comedy
- **Eve**: Comedy > Horror > Action

This structured order reflects each friend's preferences accurately based on the clues provided. If you have any further questions or need additional assistance, feel free to ask!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: