User: 

You are given access to make searches on the Internet. The format for making a search is: 1. The user sends a message. 2. You will decide whether to make a search. If you choose to make a search, you will output a single message, containing the word 
 (EXACTLY AS IT IS GIVEN TO YOU), followed by ONLY your web search query. After outputting your search query, you MUST output the token 
 (EXACTLY AS IT IS GIVEN TO YOU) to denote the end of the search query. Keep your search query concise as there is a 400 characters limit.
The system will then append the web search results at the end of the user message, starting with the token 
. Take note that the user CANNOT ACCESS the content under 
 - YOU should incorporate these results into your response. Additionally, If the token 
 is present in the user's message, then you MUST NOT request another web search.

IMPORTANT! You should choose to search the web ONLY if ANY of the following circumstances are met:
1. User is asking about current events or something that requires real-time information (news, sports scores, 'latest' information, etc.)
2. User is asking about some term you are unfamiliar with (e.g. if it's a little-known term, if it's a person you don't know well, etc.)
3. User is asking about anything that involves numerical facts (e.g. distances between places, population count, sizes, date and time, etc.)
4. User explicitly asks you to search or provide links to references.
If the user's query does NOT require a web search, YOU MUST NEVER run one for no reason.
However, NEVER refuse to search the web if the user asks you to provide such information.

When using web search results, you are encouraged to cite references where appropriate, using inline links in standard markdown format.
You are also allowed to make use of web search results from previous messages, if they are STRONGLY RELEVANT to the current message.

When you are not running a web search, respond completely as per normal - there is NO NEED to mention that you're not searching. 
Do your best to be informative. However, you MUST NOT make up any information. If you think you might not know something, search for it.

Assistant: Understood. I will strictly follow these instructions in this conversation.
User: is there a jira app that sits in mac tray to show summary of in progress assigned tasks
Assistant: Yes, there are a few apps available for macOS that can integrate with Jira and sit in the menu bar (tray) to show summaries of your assigned tasks. One such app is "JIRA Client," which allows you to track issues and tasks directly from your Mac menu bar. Another option is "Menu for Jira," which provides an easy way to view Jira issues, project details, and more from the menu bar.

These apps typically require you to authenticate with your Jira account and then display a list of issues or tasks assigned to you, often with options to filter or sort them. You can check the Mac App Store or look for third-party app developers for more options or specific features that you need.
User: show me the urls


 for "JIRA Client mac menu bar app URL":

No results found.
Assistant: It seems there weren't any search results specifically for "JIRA Client" that integrates with the macOS menu bar. However, you can explore alternatives by searching the Mac App Store or checking third-party app developers for menu bar apps that integrate with Jira. Look for apps like "Menu for Jira" or similar ones that suit your requirements. Additionally, checking [Jira's official marketplace](https://marketplace.atlassian.com/) might reveal some useful integrations and plugins.
User: sinon make sure spy was called with argument including a string
Assistant: To verify if a Sinon spy was called with an argument that includes a specific string, you can use Sinon’s assertions or check the arguments manually. Here's how you can do it using both approaches:

### Using Sinon Assertions

If you're using Sinon’s built-in assertions, you can leverage them as follows:

```javascript
sinon.assert.calledWithMatch(yourSpy, sinon.match.string.contains("yourSubstring"));
```

### Manual Check

If you prefer checking the arguments manually, you can iterate through the spy’s calls and use JavaScript string methods:

```javascript
// Assuming `yourSpy` is the spy you've created
const calls = yourSpy.getCalls();
const stringToCheck = "yourSubstring";

let wasCalledWithSubstring = calls.some(call => {
  return call.args.some(arg => typeof arg === 'string' && arg.includes(stringToCheck));
});

console.log("Was called with substring:", wasCalledWithSubstring);
```

### Explanation
- **Sinon Assertion**: `calledWithMatch` combined with `sinon.match.string.contains` checks if any call to the spy included an argument that is a string containing your specified substring.
- **Manual Check**: This approach iterates over all calls to the spy. For each call, it checks each argument to see if it is a string that contains the specified substring.

You can choose either method depending on your coding style and requirements.
User: use expect format
Assistant: To verify if a Sinon spy was called with an argument that includes a specific string using the `expect` assertion style, you can make use of `sinon-chai` alongside the Chai assertion library. Here's how you can do it:

### Setup

Ensure you have both `chai` and `sinon-chai` installed and set up in your test environment:

```javascript
const chai = require('chai');
const sinon = require('sinon');
const sinonChai = require('sinon-chai');

chai.use(sinonChai);
const expect = chai.expect;
```

### Testing for a Substring

You can then use the following code to check if the spy was called with an argument including a specific string:

```javascript
// Create your spy
const yourSpy = sinon.spy();

// Example call to the spy
yourSpy("This is a test string");

// Use expect to verify
expect(yourSpy).to.have.been.calledWithMatch(sinon.match.string.contains("test"));
```

### Explanation
- **`sinon.match.string.contains("test")`**: This matcher checks if any call to the spy contains at least one argument which is a string that includes the substring "test".
- **`expect(yourSpy).to.have.been.calledWithMatch`**: This uses `sinon-chai` to integrate Sinon matchers into the Chai assertion. It checks if there was a call to `yourSpy` that matches the specified condition.

This approach provides a clean and expressive way to assert that your spy was called with specific conditions using a combination of Sinon and Chai's powerful assertions.
User: how to create a stub of a class without instantiating it 
Assistant: To create a stub of a class without instantiating it using Sinon, you need to work with the class prototype. By stubbing methods on a class’s prototype, you can modify the behavior of those methods on any instance of the class. Here's how you can do it:

### Example

Let's assume you have a class named `MyClass` with a method `myMethod`:

```javascript
class MyClass {
  myMethod() {
    return "original value";
  }
}
```

### Stubbing the Class Method

You can use Sinon to stub the method on the class's prototype:

```javascript
const sinon = require('sinon');

// Stubbing `myMethod` on `MyClass.prototype`
sinon.stub(MyClass.prototype, 'myMethod').returns('stubbed value');

// Now, any instance of MyClass will have `myMethod` stubbed
const instance = new MyClass();
console.log(instance.myMethod()); // Outputs: "stubbed value"
```

### Explanation

- **`sinon.stub(MyClass.prototype, 'myMethod')`**: This line stubs the `myMethod` on the prototype of `MyClass`. As a result, any instance of `MyClass` will use the stubbed method instead of the original one.
- **`.returns('stubbed value')`**: This specifies the return value of the stubbed method. In this case, any call to `myMethod` on any instance of `MyClass` will return `'stubbed value'`.

### Important Note

- **Impact on All Instances**: Since stub is applied on the prototype, it affects all instances of the class created after the stub is applied.
- **Restoring Original Behavior**: If you need to restore the original behavior for any reason, you should use the `restore` method provided by Sinon to remove the stub and restore the original function.

```javascript
MyClass.prototype.myMethod.restore(); // Restores the original method
```

Using these steps, you can effectively stub class methods without needing to instantiate the class itself.
User: hopw to mock a class without instantiting it
Assistant: To mock a class without instantiating it, you can create a mock object that mimics the class's behavior using a mocking library like Sinon. This allows you to define the expected interactions and behaviors for the class's methods and properties. Here's a basic outline of how you can achieve this using Sinon:

### Example

Suppose you have a class `MyClass` with methods `methodOne` and `methodTwo`:

```javascript
class MyClass {
  methodOne() {
    return "original method one";
  }

  methodTwo() {
    return "original method two";
  }
}
```

### Mocking the Class

You can create a mock for this class without instantiating it by using Sinon’s `sinon.stub` on the prototype of the class:

```javascript
const sinon = require('sinon');

// Create an object to represent the mock
const mock = {
  methodOne: sinon.stub().returns('mocked method one'),
  methodTwo: sinon.stub().returns('mocked method two')
};

// Use `mock` as a substitute for `MyClass` instance
console.log(mock.methodOne()); // Outputs: "mocked method one"
console.log(mock.methodTwo()); // Outputs: "mocked method two"
```

### Explanation

- **Creating the Mock Object**: The `mock` object is a plain JavaScript object where you manually define each method you want to mock using `sinon.stub()`. Each stub specifies a mocked return value or behavior.
- **Using the Mock**: You can now use this `mock` object in your tests wherever an instance of `MyClass` would be used, allowing you to isolate the class behavior in your tests.

### Extending with Expectations

If you need more advanced interactions, such as verifying that methods are called with certain arguments or a specific number of times, you can expand the mock definition with expectations:

```javascript
mock.methodOne.withArgs('someArgument').returns('result for specific argument');
```

In summary, by using a mock object and stubbing necessary methods, you can effectively simulate a class's behavior without directly instantiating it, making it easier to isolate and test specific components of your application.
User: with typescript support
Assistant: To mock a class in TypeScript without instantiating it, you can use libraries like Sinon together with TypeScript features. Here’s how you can do it, ensuring you have strong type support and compile-time checking.

### Example

Suppose you have a TypeScript class called `MyClass` with methods `methodOne` and `methodTwo`:

```typescript
class MyClass {
  methodOne(): string {
    return "original method one";
  }

  methodTwo(): string {
    return "original method two";
  }
}
```

### Mocking with TypeScript Support

1. **Install Required Packages**: Ensure you have Sinon and its TypeScript types installed:

   ```bash
   npm install sinon @types/sinon --save-dev
   ```

2. **Create a Mock with Sinon**: Leverage TypeScript’s type system to create a mock object that resembles the `MyClass` interface:

```typescript
import sinon, { SinonStubbedInstance } from 'sinon';

let mock: SinonStubbedInstance<MyClass> = sinon.createStubInstance(MyClass);

mock.methodOne.returns('mocked method one');
mock.methodTwo.returns('mocked method two');

// Use `mock` as a substitute for `MyClass` instance
console.log(mock.methodOne()); // Outputs: "mocked method one"
console.log(mock.methodTwo()); // Outputs: "mocked method two"
```

### Explanation

- **SinonStubbedInstance Type**: This type provides type-safe access to all the methods and properties of the class `MyClass` as sinon stubs.
- **`createStubInstance`**: This method from Sinon creates a mock object where each method is a stub, maintaining TypeScript typings.
- **Method Stubbing**: You can customize the behavior of each method using `.returns` or other Sinon stub methods. This ensures that your mock object returns specific results when methods are called.

### Extending with Expectation and Argument Matching

If you need to add argument matching or more complex behaviors, you can enhance the mocks further:

```typescript
mock.methodOne.withArgs('specificArg').returns('special return for specificArg');

// Verify interactions
sinon.assert.calledWith(mock.methodOne, 'specificArg');
```

### Summary

This approach gives you a robust and type-safe way to mock classes in TypeScript. Using `SinonStubbedInstance` ensures that your mock objects correctly implement the same interface as the class they’re mocking, providing compile-time type checks and better integration with TypeScript’s type system.
User: check if a stub instance was called
Assistant: To check if a Sinon stub instance was called, you can use assertions provided by Sinon. When working with TypeScript, you can leverage type-safe assertions to verify method calls on the stubbed instance. Here's a walkthrough on how to set this up:

### Example in TypeScript

Suppose you have a TypeScript class `MyClass` with a method `myMethod`, and you want to check if it's been called.

```typescript
class MyClass {
  myMethod(): string {
    return "original method";
  }
}
```

### Steps to Check if a Stub was Called

1. **Create a Stub Instance**: Use Sinon to stub the instance of your class.

2. **Call the Method**: Simulate method calls on the stub instance.

3. **Check if the Method was Called**: Use Sinon assertions to verify the method call.

#### Example Code

```typescript
import sinon, { SinonStubbedInstance } from 'sinon';

// Create a stubbed instance of MyClass
let stubInstance: SinonStubbedInstance<MyClass> = sinon.createStubInstance(MyClass);

// Call the stubbed method (for demonstration purposes)
stubInstance.myMethod();

// Check if the method was called
console.log(stubInstance.myMethod.called); // Outputs: true

// Alternatively, use Sinon assertions
sinon.assert.called(stubInstance.myMethod);
```

### Explanation

- **CreateStubInstance**: This method creates an instance of `MyClass` where all methods are stubbed, allowing you to test the interactions without executing the actual code.

- **Method Invocation**: Invoking `stubInstance.myMethod()` simulates a call to that method, which is then recorded by Sinon for assertion.

- **Checking Calls**:
  - **`called` Property**: `stubInstance.myMethod.called` is a boolean property that indicates whether the method was called.
  - **Sinon Assertions**: `sinon.assert.called(stubInstance.myMethod)` throws an error if the method was not called, providing a clear way to ensure the method was executed during tests.

By using these steps, you can effectively verify that methods on a stub instance have been called, helping validate interactions within your tests with strong type support in TypeScript.
User: sinon match anything
Assistant: In Sinon, `sinon.match` can be used to create flexible and powerful matchers that allow you to verify that functions are called with arguments meeting certain conditions. If you want to match any argument, you can use `sinon.match.any`. This is useful when you're interested in confirming that a function was called, but you don't care about the specific arguments passed during the call. Here's how you can use it:

### Example

Suppose you have a function `myFunction` that you want to stub and check if it accepts any kind of argument:

```javascript
const sinon = require('sinon');

// Create a spy or a stub for demonstration
let myFunction = sinon.stub();

// Call the function with various arguments
myFunction('a string');
myFunction(123);
myFunction({ key: 'value' });

// Verify that `myFunction` was called with any argument
sinon.assert.calledWith(myFunction, sinon.match.any);
```

### Explanation

- **`sinon.match.any`**: This matcher succeeds for any argument. It’s effectively saying, “I don’t care what argument was passed, I just care that an argument was passed.”
  
- **`assert.calledWith`**: This assertion checks whether the function was called with arguments that match the provided matcher. Here, it ensures the function was called with any kind of argument.

### Additional Matchers

If you want more specific matchers, Sinon offers several options:

- **`sinon.match.string`**: Matches if the argument is a string.
- **`sinon.match.number`**: Matches if the argument is a number.
- **`sinon.match.object`**: Matches if the argument is an object.
- **`sinon.match.func`**: Matches if the argument is a function.

These matchers allow you to write more expressive and flexible tests by focusing only on the aspects that are important for your verification, leaving the rest to be less strictly checked. This can significantly reduce the maintenance burden of tests, especially as code evolves
User: with args matching instance of error with message
Assistant: To match arguments that are instances of an `Error` with a specific message using Sinon, you can utilize `sinon.match.instanceOf` combined with `sinon.match.has`. This allows you to verify that a function was called with an argument that is an `Error` object and has a specific message. Here's how you can set this up:

### Example

Suppose you have a function `logError` that is expected to be called with an `Error` object:

```javascript
const sinon = require('sinon');

// Create a spy or stub
let logError = sinon.stub();

// Simulate a call with an error
logError(new Error("Specific error message"));

// Define a matcher for an Error with a specific message
const errorMatcher = sinon.match.instanceOf(Error).and(sinon.match.has("message", "Specific error message"));

// Verify that `logError` was called with an Error object with the specific message
sinon.assert.calledWith(logError, errorMatcher);
```

### Explanation

- **`sinon.match.instanceOf(Error)`**: This matcher checks if the argument is an instance of `Error`.

- **`sinon.match.has("message", "Specific error message")`**: This matcher checks if the `message` property on the `Error` object is `"Specific error message"`.

- **`.and()`**: Combines the two matchers (instance check and property check) into a single matcher, ensuring both conditions are satisfied.

- **`assert.calledWith`**: This assertion checks that the `logError` function was called with an argument that matches the combined matcher conditions.

### Benefits

Using `sinon.match` provides a flexible and expressive way to validate function calls with complex arguments, ensuring your tests remain robust and maintainable even as code evolves. This approach is particularly useful when dealing with exceptions and error handling in your application, as it allows you to confirm not only that an error was thrown but that it was the expected error with the expected message.
User: check if js error comes from cntr c
Assistant: To check if a JavaScript error specifically originates from a `CTRL+C` (copy operation or interruption), you'll typically deal with scenarios where you intercept or handle such actions within a Node.js environment, rather than browser JavaScript. In Node.js, `CTRL+C` sends a signal (SIGINT) to the process, which can be intercepted and handled. However, in a client-side application (browser), `CTRL+C` is usually associated with copying text, and isn't directly related to JavaScript errors. Thus, detecting an error explicitly caused by a `CTRL+C` operation isn't typically applicable.

Here's how you can handle `CTRL+C` in a Node.js context:

### Handling `CTRL+C` in Node.js

In Node.js, you can listen for the `SIGINT` signal to gracefully handle `CTRL+C` events:

```javascript
process.on('SIGINT', () => {
  console.log('Received SIGINT. Program interrupted by CTRL+C.');
  process.exit();
});
```

### Explanation

- **`process.on('SIGINT', callback)`**: Listens for the SIGINT signal, which is emitted when the user presses `CTRL+C`.
- **Graceful Shutdown**: Within the callback, you can perform any cleanup or logging before exiting the process.

### Detecting Errors

If your requirement involves detecting specific errors or exceptions that occur on `CTRL+C` (though not typically related), you would need to handle them within specific try-catch blocks or using error events in your application logic.

### Conclusion

Handling `CTRL+C` typically involves signal handling in Node.js, while errors in JavaScript are typically runtime exceptions that arise from code execution issues. These two are generally separate concerns, and thus, dealing with them involves different approaches depending on the context and environment of your application.
User: using a try catch ?
Assistant: