You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


[MUSIC PLAYING]
EMILY STARK: Welcome.
I hope you're enjoying the
first day of chrome dev summit.
I am an engineer on the
Chrome security team.
And my colleagues and
I on the security team
are on a mission to be
honest with the people using
our software about their
connection security.
And we need the help of you all,
the developers in this room,
to do that.
The first way that I'm going
to ask you to help us out
is to do a little
thought exercise
where you put yourself in the
shoes of an average web user.
So probably not a
developer, maybe someone
who is even new to
computers or new to the web.
And if you were this
average web user looking
at this omnibox, which is what
Chrome shows when you visit
an insecure, plain
HTTP site in Chrome
today, if you were this
average web user, what might
this omnibox say to you?
You can see it has the
host name of the site,
and it has this sort of neutral
informational icon, right?
So if you were seeing this, what
would this mean about the site
that you're visiting?
As an average web
user you probably
wouldn't realize that
an attacker sitting
between the web browser,
between your computer,
and the web server can
read any data that's
passing back and forth
between the two of you.
So that could be sensitive data
like passwords, credit cards,
health content, all of
the stuff you probably
don't want an attacker
sitting between your computer
and the web server to read.
Or as an average web user
looking at this omnibox,
you probably wouldn't realize
that even though the omnibox
says example.com,
that's not necessarily
who you're actually talking to.
Over insecure HTTP,
you don't actually
have that guarantee at all.
You could be talking
to any attacker who's
impersonating example.com.
And that's probably pretty
unintuitive to the average web
user who looks at the
omnibox and sees example.com.
And finally, this
average web user probably
wouldn't realize that
any attacker sitting
between your computer
and the web server
can modify or tamper
with content that's going
back and forth between them.
That tampering could be to
inject ads, perhaps overwriting
your legitimate ads.
It could be to insert some
fake or malicious content.
It could even be to trick
the user into downloading
or installing malware.
So if this was your site,
with this attacker modifying
or tampering with
your content, this
is obviously very bad
for your users, right?
They're probably getting
a poor user experience.
They might even be being tricked
into downloading malware.
And it's bad for your site.
It's bad for your brand.
It's bad for your revenue.
You're not delivering the
legitimate good user experience
that you want to deliver
And these risks are real.
They happen every single
day in coffee shop Wi-Fi,
internet service providers
injecting ads, software
like Firesheep that
makes it really,
really easy to passively sniff
on unencrypted session cookies.
These things happen.
They're real.
They're probably
affecting your users.
And the way to protect
your users from that
is to use HTTPS.
These risks are why we, on
the Chrome security team,
are on this mission
to fix this UI,
which we don't think
is being particularly
honest or forthcoming about what
it means to use insecure HTTP.
What we plan to do
in the future is not
this sort of neutral
presentation,
but a presentation that
actually delivers a warning
to the user, the
risks that they're
taking by using insecure HTTP.
So in this talk, I'm to
tell you about our mission
to use this to get to a place
where we can use this warning
UI to be honest with our
users about their connection
security, and how and why you,
as developers, should help us
with that.
Today I'm going
to be telling you
about some newly
released metrics
about the honest state of
HTTPS usage in the world today.
And those metrics will hopefully
help motivate why and how you
as developers should help
us move the web to a place
where it's HTTPS by
default, because it's
good for you and your users.
It's good for your
site, and it's also
good for the web as a whole.
And finally I'll be previewing
some upcoming Chrome UI
changes that illustrate
our strategy, which
is to gently prod developers
like you into adopting HTTPS
while simultaneously easing
our user is into the idea
that HTTP is probably not
what they want to be using.
In the spirit of
honesty, I'm going
to start by telling
you about a section
that we added last week to the
Google Transparency Report.
The Google Transparency Report,
if you haven't seen it before,
it's a collection of all sorts
of interesting and useful data
about Google, and about
the internet as a whole.
And for most of this
year, we've had a section
on this transparency report
that's devoted to HTTPS.
Very interesting
data, but up until now
it's mostly focused on
HTTPS usage at Google,
so on Google Services,
Google Traffic,
and also on some
of the top sites.
Tracking this data has
been pretty encouraging.
Since we launched the
Transparency Report, the HTTPS
section of the Transparency
Report in February,
we've seen 12 more of the
top sites adopt modern HTTPS.
But this is not necessarily
the full picture, right?
Because what are the top sites?
What does that actually
mean for people
who are using Chrome every Day
That's why at last
week, we released
a new section in the
Transparency Report
that releases data about HTTPS
usage as Chrome users see it.
One of the milestones
that we passed recently,
as you can see here, is
that on desktop platforms,
Chrome users now load over
50% of their pages over HTTPS.
This is a big milestone.
And overall, we're pretty
happy about the trend
here, which is that
HTTPS usage, when
we look at that as percent of
pages that Chrome users load,
slowly but steadily increasing.
That's what we want to see.
I mean, obviously we want
to see faster increase,
but slow but study--
we'll take it.
Another way to look
at it, it's not
the percent of pages that
are loaded over HTTPS,
but the percentage
of time spent.
And as you can see
from this graph,
this is an even
more optimistic way
to look at it, because
Chrome users spend,
on desktop platforms, about 75%
or more of their time on HTTPS.
We don't necessarily know
why this is for sure.
But one way you can think
of it is that users probably
spend more time on
sites like Gmail,
or Facebook, or your super
engaging progressive web apps,
than they do when they're
just googling around
for some information, clicking
a link, navigating away.
So we think that users
spend most of their browsing
time on sort of heavy-duty
apps that, for the most part,
are top sites using HTTPS.
I also want to make a
quick note about Android
usage, which you
might have noticed
in both of these graphs,
is this green line.
It's kind of an outlier
down at the bottom.
Again, we don't know
why this is for sure,
but one hypothesis
we have is that
on Android, this
sort of serious web
browsing on Gmail,
Facebook, things like that--
that stuff that Android
users are doing in apps.
So from Chrome's
perspective, they
see more of the non-HTTPS
traffic, and less
of the traffic that tends to be
HTTPS that Android users tend
to do in apps.
So again, that's
just a hypothesis.
But we think it
kind of makes sense.
And it means that as
the mobile web becomes
more and more engaging, as you
all build and gain traction
on your progressive
web apps, we would
hope to see this line
kind of continuing
to go up, and hopefully
catch up with desktop.
So this is great
news, developers
like you are adopting HTTPS.
You might be wondering why.
What is driving this slow but
steady increase in HTTPS usage?
And we can't tell
you for sure, but I
want to pull out a few things
that we hear over and over
again, anecdotally,
from developers
who are transitioning
their sites to HTTPS.
First, modern browsers,
like Chrome, and Firefox,
and others, are restricting
usage of powerful features
over insecure HTTP.
Some features have
already been deprecated
and are already not
available over insecure HTTP,
and some will be restricted
in the near future.
So these are things like
geolocation, service workers,
push notifications, the
payments and credential
Management APIs, all sorts
of things that you've
heard about today that you need
to build a progressive web app,
are increasingly only
available over HTTPS.
So we're not doing
this to be mean.
We think it makes
sense, and that
is the best thing
to give our users
more control over their
privacy, and devices, and data.
And I think this is
easiest understood
with an example
like geolocation.
Because if a website wants
access to my location,
and if I grant them
access to my location,
then I'm giving them information
about potentially where I live,
where I work, where I shop,
where I go to the doctor,
what I do on my weekends, all
sorts of things that is pretty
privacy-sensitive information
for a website to have.
And that may be fine.
I may be perfectly happy sharing
my location with some website,
but I can't really make that
a meaningful decision unless I
know which website
I'm talking to.
And that's exactly the
guarantee that HTTPS
gives you, which is why we are
increasingly restricting access
to these privacy-sensitive,
powerful features
unless the user actually knows
which site they're talking to.
As I said, Chrome is not
the only browser doing this,
and just one other
example is Firefox.
In this blog post,
they actually announce
that they're eventually
planning to require
HTTPS for all new features.
So this is something
that browsers
are pretty much united around.
They hope that it makes
sense that if you're
going to grant access to
privacy-sensitive information
or powerful feature,
the user should
know which website they're
granting that access to.
We think this is one of the
drivers behind HTTPS adoption,
because we hear it
from developers.
One example of this is the BBC,
which cited these restrictions
on powerful features
as one of the reasons
that they decided
to move bbc.co.uk
to HTTPS earlier this year.
Another consideration
that we think
is behind the slow but steady
increase in HTTPS usage
is that HTTPS performance
is getting better and better
every day.
And it's no longer
the bottleneck
that it maybe once was
10 or 15 years ago.
What you're seeing
here is a website
built by one of my
colleagues, Ilya Grigorik.
It's called
istlsfastyet.com, TLS
being that the protocol
underlying HTTPS.
So the answer is
yes, but that's not
just what this
website tells you.
It tells you about all of
the performance improvements
and enhancements that are
coming out every day with HTTPS.
And it tells you
how to configure
your server with them, and
which servers support them.
So it's a great
source of information
about HTTPS performance.
I want to draw particular
attention to HTTP/2, which
is the next version of HTTP,
and offers a whole suite of web
performance improvements.
But it is critical in
this talk because HTTP/2
is only available if
you're also using HTTPS.
So what we hear from developers
is that, in the case that they
do encounter some performance
hit when they move to HTTPS,
it can often be offset--
more than offset--
by the performance
advantages that they
unlock using things that are
only available over HTTPS,
like HTTP/2.
So these are some of the
things, these restrictions
on powerful features,
the improvements
in HTTPS performance,
these are some
of the examples of what we think
is driving this slow but steady
increase in HTTPS adoption.
But while things are moving
in the right direction,
we still have a gap to close.
And we need your
help doing that.
We need your help by
adopting HTTPS on your site,
so that we can get as close as
possible to HTTPS everywhere.
And we need that.
We need to be as close
as possible to HTTPS
everywhere if we're going
to get to the place we want
to be where we're
honest with our users
about connection security.
My point here is
that if we were to,
tomorrow, turn on
this warning state
that we want to have
where we do this kind
of scary red, dangerous warning
indicator on insecure HTTP,
if we were to just
turn that on tomorrow,
it would probably be a
little bit counterproductive.
Users would see it everywhere.
They'd see it all the time.
They'd learn to ignore it.
They'd have to ignore
it to use the web.
And they kind of get trained
to basically just not see it.
So that's not what we want.
We want it to be the case
that insecure HTTP is
a pretty rare occurrence.
So rare that when the
user encounters it,
we can show them this Warning
and they will pay attention.
They won't be scared, or
confused, or habituated.
They will see it.
They'll pay attention.
And they'll understand
the risks of the situation
that they're in,
where they don't
have any guarantees against
attackers reading their content
or injecting malicious
content or any of those risks
that I talked about at
the beginning of the talk.
So that's what
we're asking of you.
We're asking you to
adopt HTTPS on your site.
It helps you, and your
users, and your site.
And it also helps
us in our mission
to make the whole
web more secure,
to make users more
educated, and to make
their activity on the web
less of a risk for them.
But we know this is not
always easy for a developers.
It can be overwhelming.
And that's why we at
Chrome, and at Google,
and in other organizations,
are mobilizing
a lot of support and
investment around helping you
transition your site to HTTPS.
One of the organizations
that is becoming
critical in this movement
is called Let's Encrypt.
Let's Encrypt is a
certificate authority,
a certificate being a
cryptographic proof of identity
that you need in
order to use HTTPS.
It's the cryptographic
proof that
proves that your site
is who you say it is.
If you say you're
example.com, you
get a certificate proving
that you're example.com.
And that's what gives
your users the guarantee
that their browsers
are actually talking
to the real example.com.
Historically,
getting certificates
has not always been easy, and
it's not always been free.
But thanks to the
work of organizations
like Let's Encrypt, it's
now possible for you
to get a certificate very
quickly with no money.
And they also provide
easy command-line tools
for automating the
management and renewal
of your certificates.
So we think this
is a critical part
of an internet infrastructure
going forwards.
Chrome has made a large
donation to Let's Encrypt ,
and users are finding it as
well because it's becoming such
a core part of the process of
running a web application that
they've come to depend on.
And in case you don't believe
me that Let's Encrypt is here
to stay, I think you can
see it just in the numbers.
This is a critical part
of internet infrastructure
that is really going to change
the way that people do HTTPS.
It already has.
Looking internally a little bit
more at Chrome and at Google,
one of the ways
that HTTPS sometimes
worries developers
is ad revenue.
And if you haven't heard
about this concern before,
it might seem a
little bit random.
What do ads have
to do with HTTPS?
B.s.
The connection is that when
you move your site to HTTPS,
you have to move all
of your content, all
of your third-party resources,
including ads, in order
for your site to work properly.
So developers are often
worried about having
to move their site
to HTTPS needing
to move all their ads to HTTPS,
and therefore losing ad revenue
from ads that are only
available over HTTP.
To help alleviate this
concern, all Google source ads
are already served over HTTPS.
So when you move
your site to HTTPS,
you will not have a revenue
hit from Google source ads,
because you they are already
available over HTTPS.
And this is backed up by
developers in the wild.
The Washington Post
moved to HTTPS recently
and saw no hit in revenue
from their Google sourced ads.
Another Google service
that people sometimes
worry about when moving to
HTTPS is losing search ranking.
Because any time you
make a large change
to your site like
this, you should
make sure you follow
the proper steps to make
sure you minimize the disruption
to your organic search traffic.
These are some of the
questions that people have,
how to move their site.
Do they do it all at once?
Do they do a little bit at a
Time what kind of fluctuation
should they expect?
And more technical
aspects of the move,
like what do they do with
robots.txt and their site maps?
And how do they tell Google
that they're moving to HTTPS?
And all those sorts of things.
What we're doing in this space
is expanding and improving
upon documentation.
And we really like to
hear from developers
about what their questions
are so that we can answer them
publicly.
These two FAQs, I recommend
to people all the time.
They are just lists of
questions that people
have with very straightforward,
practical advice
answering some of the questions
I had on the previous slides.
And we also have a
web fundamentals guide
that walks you through
the process of setting
up and configuring HTTPS,
performance tuning, things
like that, and also
has a section on how
to handle your transition
from the perspective of Google
search ranking.
CNET was able to move to
HTTPS with, as you can see,
minimal disruption to
their search ranking.
So we are hopeful that we have
improved the documentation
to such an extent
that if you just
do a little bit of research
and follow the steps
in the documentation
that we provide,
this isn't a traumatic thing
for your search ranking.
It really shouldn't be.
Finally, nearest and
dearest my heart-- and I
could spend a whole talk talking
about web platform and browser
tools that we're building,
and sometimes standardizing
and evangelizing
in other browsers,
to help developers
like you move to HTTPS.
These are things that I work
on pretty much every day.
And I just want to give one
example, which is the dev tools
security panel.
So if you move
your site to HTTPS
and you open it up in dev tools
and you go to the security
panel here, you'll
see that it's designed
to basically help you figure
out if you've done it right.
If you have any
problems, if you've
made any mistakes in
your transition to HTTPS,
it will help you try to
figure out what they are
and tell you how to fix them.
These tools are ways that
we, at Chrome and at Google,
want to guide developers into
using HTTPS on their sites.
But simultaneously,
we're planning
to start easing
users into the idea
that HTTP is bad
because we want to get
to, eventually, a place where
enough developers are using
HTTPS that we can
really warn users
when they have a
lack of connection
security on insecure HTTP.
And we don't want to just
jolt them into that world
right away.
We want to ease them into
this association between HTTP
and bad.
This is the new UI
treatment that we'll
be using for some insecure
HTTP sites in Chrome 56,
which goes to stable in January.
So you can see we're still doing
a neutral informational icon,
but we're adding
the Not Secure text
to start to educate
users about what it means
to be using insecure HTTP.
And we'll be specifically
launching this for HTTP pages
that have passwords or
credit card inputs on them.
So our goal here is to use
passwords and credit cards
as a signal that
the user might be
in a particularly sensitive
situation in which they want
to be particularly
careful with their data,
and in which it's especially
important to warn them
about the risks of
insecurity HTTP.
So this feature is
still in development.
So I want to stress that
it's subject to change,
but you can go try it out
in Chrome Canary today.
And we would love for you to
do that, both to report bugs,
to see what it's like browsing
the web with this feature on.
I find it really interesting
to see what it's like,
a glimpse of browsing
the web in the future,
and also to try it
out on your site
and see if your site will have
this UI applied to it if you're
not using HTTPS yet.
So to do this, you just go
download and install Chrome
Canary if you haven't already.
Go to Chrome://flags and find
this mark non-secure as flag,
and flip it to the option that
says something about passwords
and credit cards
on an HTTP page.
So if you do this and then
you go browse around the web,
or browse around
your site, you may
see where we're
doing-- as I said,
we're detecting when a
password or a credit card field
appears on the page and using
that to trigger this Not
Secure warning in the omnibox.
So we really encourage
you to try this out.
Try out your own site if
you're not using HTTPS.
And if you find
that your users will
see this Not Secure
warning come January,
maybe you want to start
using HTTPS by then.
Our hope is that this does help
incentivize developers like
you to move the
HTTPS, and also starts
to build the association
in users' minds
between entering sensitive
data, and the lack of security
of HTTP.
So fortunately, it's not just
about negative indicators.
We have sticks and
we also have carrots.
If you download
Chrome 55 beta, we're
already using this secure chip
for sites that are using HTTPS.
So it's not just that you'll
get a Not Secure warning
if you have a password
or credit card on HTTP.
If you adopt HTTPS, you
get this shiny green badge
next to your site
telling users that hey,
you are using a
secure connection.
So we hope this
provides some incentive
to adopt HTTPS, in addition to
all the other benefits that you
get, like the privacy
and security benefits
for your users, and
the ability to use
powerful features like
geolocation and service workers
that you get with HTTPS.
So that's a glimpse of
the very near future,
these secure warnings
for secure sites,
and starting to show Not
Secure warnings, which
is closer to honest
truth about HTTP
for some sites in Chrome 56.
But this is where we're going.
We hope to get here,
as soon as possible,
to a place where the web is
as close as possible to HTTPS
everywhere, so that
we can be fully
honest and truthful
with our users
about what insecure HTTP means.
One of the things that we're
considering doing in the future
is gradually picking
more and more signals.
So in Chrome 56 it'll be
passwords and credit card
fields.
Maybe in the future
it might be something
like when the user
is in incognito mode,
or when the user is
downloading a file over HTTP,
things like that.
More and more signals to
gradually make an assumption
that the user is in a
potentially sensitive situation
and warn them more
and more aggressively
about the insecurity of HTTP
until we get to the world
that we want to be in.
So the same of my talk
today has been honesty.
The new transparency
report metrics
show an honest
picture of the world
when it comes to HTTPS usage.
It shows that we're moving
in the right direction,
we have a slow but
steady increase,
but we need your help closing
the gap by adopting HTTPS
on your site, which
we think is good
for you, for your revenue, your
brand, your user experience.
It's good for your users'
privacy and security.
And it's also good for
the web as a whole,
the whole ecosystem, by
helping us get to a point
where we can be fully honest and
truthful with the people using
Chrome about their
connection security.
Thank you, and enjoy
the rest of the summit.
[APPLAUSE]
[MUSIC PLAYING]