give me conclusion for systematic review on basis of given discussion A randomized controlled experiment was performed by Kean et al. to see if mindfulness-based treatment was effective in helping people quit smoking. The research found encouraging findings, indicating that mindfulness therapies might have a good effect on mental health in addition to helping people quit smoking. By integrating mindfulness techniques into smoking cessation programmes, a more comprehensive strategy for tackling addiction and mental health might be presented [1}. Mobaraki et al. utilized a quasi-experimental design to assess the efficacy of a motivational text-messaging programme in helping coronary angioplasty patients quit smoking. The study indicates that mobile-based interventions can be valuable in promoting smoking cessation, particularly in populations with cardiovascular risk factors. This approach offers a convenient and easily accessible means of support for individuals undergoing medical procedures.[2]Williams et al. conducted a study that examined the effects of remote smoking cessation interventions on participants who were undergoing Targeted Lung Health Checks. The study showcased the effectiveness of prompt interventions, even in distant locations, in greatly enhancing smoking cessation rates. The findings underscore the significance of incorporating smoking cessation efforts into regular health screenings to enhance their effectiveness.[3]Kjeld et al. conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy of the multi-component intervention 'Focus' on students in vocational education. The study indicates that implementing thorough interventions within schools can effectively decrease the prevalence of smoking among young adults. Incorporating smoking cessation programmes into educational settings could be a proactive approach to tackling smoking initiation.[4]A double-blind, randomized controlled trial was conducted by Caponnetto et al. to assess the effectiveness of varenicline and counseling in helping individuals quit vaping. The study suggests that utilising pharmacological interventions, along with counseling, can prove to be effective in tackling vaping dependence. This finding is especially significant considering the growing popularity of e-cigarette use [5]
The study conducted by Dyer et al. examined the effects of different flavours of e-liquid on the desire for traditional cigarettes. The study highlighted the potential impact of flavouring on smoking behaviour, underscoring the need to take into account various factors in smoking cessation interventions, such as the role of electronic cigarettes and their components.6
 In conclusion, the studies that have been reviewed indicate that smoking cessation interventions come in a variety of forms and can effectively reach various populations and settings. By incorporating both conventional methods and cutting-edge techniques like mindfulness, mobile-based interventions, and school-based programmes, there is potential for significant improvement in smoking cessation results. Nevertheless, the diverse range of methodologies and populations examined underscores the importance of customised interventions to tackle the intricacies of smoking behaviours and preferences. Further research is necessary to continue investigating and enhancing smoking cessation strategies in order to enhance overall success rates and decrease the worldwide impact of tobacco-related illnesses. To assist people in quitting smoking, a variety of smoking cessation strategies have been developed, ranging from behavioral therapy to pharmaceutical treatments. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of two novel smoking cessation interventions in adults: (7) a stress-based intervention proposed by Barnabe et al. in Neuropsychopharmacology and (8) insula deep repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with varenicline investigated by Ibrahim et al. in brain stimulation. Barnabe and colleagues presented a new stress-based intervention for non-treatment seeking smokers. The stress-based intervention resulted in a considerable decrease in cigarette consumption among research participants. The method, which was based on neuropsychopharmacology, used stress modulation to affect smoking behavior. The results imply that therapies designed to reduce stress reactions may be beneficial in decreasing smoking among those who are not actively pursuing standard cessation treatments.Ibrahim et al. - Insula deep rTMS coupled with varenicline: In a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled experiment, Ibrahim et al. investigated the effectiveness of insula deep rTMS combined with varenicline. The combination intervention resulted in a significant improvement in smoking cessation rates when compared to the sham-controlled group, according to the research. Deep rTMS focused at the insula, a brain area linked with addiction, in combination with varenicline showed encouraging results for improving smoking cessation outcomes. The OaSiS Trial's emphasis on lung screening patients is important since smoking cessation benefits are highest at this stage. The combination of counselling, medication, and behavioral assistance shows the necessity of a multifaceted approach to smoking cessation. Exploring these strategies' execution reveals their real-world usefulness for smoking cessation. However, applying trial results to public health measures may be difficult. Participant adherence, intervention durability, and generalizability to varied groups must be considered. These elements should be studied to build scalable and sustained smoking cessation therapies for different locations and populations.