Rewrite the entire text below, make it sound more coherent and better. Mention everything in great detail, including Hadithes and Quran Verses. Be very sceptical of the author Mohammad Hijab and also add some additional good arguments:

''Hijab’s interpretation of the term “عظام” (itham) in the Quran might be a misrepresentation. The word has been consistently used throughout the Quran to refer to bones, as seen in verses 35 and 82 of Surah Al-Mu’minun, where the prophet addresses non-Muslims’ questions about the resurrection process and how they would be resurrected from bones in their graves. There is no instance in the Quran where “عظام” has been used to mean cartilage.

Hijab is completely false,,, cartilage and bones are nothing alike& not under the same category,,,cartilage is a flexible connective tissue , it differs from bones ,,, plus even if it was not chronological the phrase "clothed the bones with flesh" is wrong coz it entitles smthing is wrapped with the other, whereas it's something that developped within another ,,,, there's also the problem of having "the flesh developed into bones" which is also incorrect

In response to Hijab’s argument that the Quran refers to precursor cartilage models of bones, this theory lacks credibility, as it fails to explain why the Quran specifically mentions bones and not cartilage (ghudhroof), which eventually gets replaced by bones (itham). The Quran also mentions a sequence of events in verse 23:14, stating, “nutfah…nutfah…alaqah…alaqah…lump, then we made the lump bones, then we clothed the bones with flesh.” However, this description is not supported by the scientific understanding of the development of the musculoskeletal system.
The actual process of ossification or bone formation begins after muscle tissue has developed, and the process of muscle formation cannot be described as “clothing” the bones. Both processes occur simultaneously, with bones continuing to grow and ossify alongside muscle development. The idea that the Quran was referring to precursor cartilage models of bones is also not supported by evidence, as the Quran mentions bone, not cartilage, which only begins to form after muscle tissue has already developed.
The natural reading of verse 23:14 suggests that bones already possess a meaningful shape and presence before they are “clothed with flesh.” However, the actual process of chondrification, which forms the cartilage precursors to bones, only begins after muscle formation has already started. Additional evidence in the Quran, such as verse 2:259, suggests that the description of bones being “clothed with flesh” refers to already recognizable bones, which is not in line with the scientific understanding of the development of the musculoskeletal system.
Therefore, it appears that Hijab’s argument fails to adequately address this discrepancy in the Quran. A more robust analysis, grounded in empirical evidence and a critical understanding of both religious texts and scientific knowledge, is necessary for a comprehensive evaluation of this issue.

Most Muslims have not studied science and more importantly the history of science.  What the Quran says was already know, or is wrong but gets re-interpreted.    They will often mention embryology, and that no one could have known this stuff 1400 years ago.   Let's see..

The Quran borrows (and only summarizes) all of its ideas of embryology from those of the Roman doctor Galen who describes them in much greater detail and describes how he made his observations in his text De Semine.  Galen lived 500 years before Muhammad.   When confronted with this, Muslims always argue that Muhammad could not have known these things, but again ignore history.    We know that Sergius of Reshaina (died 536 AD), one of the best Greek translators of his time (he translated 26 of Galen's books, as well as works of Aristotle), was a Nestorian who moved to Jundishapur in Persia. "Coincidentally", one of Muhammad's closest followers and a doctor that Muhammad frequently used, Al-Harith ibn Kalada (died 13 AH), happened to have studied in that school according to Muslim historians Ibn Abi Usaybia and al-Qifti (and married Muhammad's aunt!).''6