Given multiple reviews about 1950 ['movie'] ['All About Eve'], each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['Good but definitely not great drama, with a far-fetched premise. Warning: Spoilers Good dialog, very good acting (particularly by Davis and Sanders), but a premise that isn\'t all that realistic; Baxter runs off from some small town with stolen money, then plans to get close with Davis by seeing all her performances in a play! Once that is achieved, the extension of the plan is to study and brown-nose Davis and play a goody-two-shoes innocent until her big break arrives as an actress. And the far-fetched thing is that it all works! We aren\'t even sure that Baxter has any real experience in acting. It would be one thing if she made it overnight in a movie, but in theater?? Sure, she knows the lines by heart, having seen the play a zillion times, but to be so good the first time in a major role?! Quite far-fetched, especially for a drama. As one can plainly see, the plot is very much Hollywoodized in the moronic old-school sense, but the theater setting is a good idea as it presents a variety of characters and twists. Some twists aren\'t very credible; 1) Baxter\'s blackmail plan doesn\'t hold much weight, but it seems to be enough for Holm; 2) Sanders\'s blackmail of Baxter has much more weight admittedly, but since she is planning to make it in Hollywood wouldn\'t her native town folk recognize her and thereby force all the filth in her past to swim up to the surface? But okay, the latter blackmail, all in all, has plenty of credence. Though interesting throughout in spite of its length, the movie is universally overrated. So much so, in fact, that one famous salivating male film-critic even praises Monroe\'s acting! To actually mention HER performance, what with all those other good actors and the much more relevant characterizations, is to truly get carried away with the male hormones. ("Yes, yes...! Even the extras are great! The way that man walks down the street in scene no.235 in the lower-left corner of the screen... Amazing!") Monroe\'s appearances are few and brief, and her affected acting is totally out-of-place. She is a feather-weight among heavy-weights. I have to add even that as far as looks are concerned Monroe is totally overshadowed by Baxter\'s beauty. Even Davis\'s charisma overshadows Monroe\'s looks. Monroe is no beauty here, probably due to the fact(?) that this movie was shot before she had all that facial surgery. If you\'d like to read my "biography" of Marilyn Monroe, contact me by e-mail. '] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.