System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Write a haiku (a three-line poem with 5-7-5 syllables) in any language and translate it to English. Explain the meaning and the theme of your poem.

[Ground truth Answer]
Original Haiku in Japanese:
春の風
桜の花と
舞い踊る

Translation in English:
Springtime breeze blows
Cherry blossoms dance with grace
Nature's harmony

Meaning and theme:
This haiku captures the essence of spring, with a gentle breeze that makes cherry blossoms dance gracefully, illustrating harmony in nature. The theme of the poem is the beauty of nature and the life-affirming emotions it evokes during the season of renewal and growth.

[Assistant's Response]
Aquí tienes un haiku en español:

Bajo el cielo azul,  
las hojas susurran paz,  
el viento danza.

**Translation:**

Under the blue sky,  
the leaves whisper peace,  
the wind dances.

**Meaning and Theme:**

Este haiku evoca una sensación de tranquilidad y conexión con la naturaleza. La imagen del cielo azul sugiere un día sereno, mientras que las hojas que susurran simbolizan la calma y la armonía que se puede encontrar en el entorno natural. El viento que danza añade un toque de vida y movimiento, recordándonos que la naturaleza está siempre en flujo. En conjunto, el poema celebra la belleza y la serenidad que se pueden experimentar al estar al aire libre, invitando al lector a reflexionar sobre la paz que se puede encontrar en los momentos simples de la vida.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: