System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
You should inspect the role of each sentence in the given long-form answer for the question. The role is one of 'Organizational sentence', 'Auxiliary Information', 'Answer', 'Example', and 'Miscellaneous'. The Organizational sentence is to inform the reader how the answer will be structured. The Auxiliary Information provides information that are related to what is discussed in the answer, but not asked in the question. The Answer is an answer sentence directly addresses the question. The Example is literally example sentence to give better understanding. The Miscellaneous contains all other sentences.\n\nQuestion: Why do elevators have an "up" and "down" call button, when you can choose any floor inside the elevator?\n\nLong-form Answer:\n\nImagine you're in a building with 20 floors. \n\nSomeone in floor 2 decided to click "floor 20", so the elevator isn't gonna stop going up until it hits floor 20.\n\nLet's say you're in floor 4 and want to go to floor 3.\n\nIf you pick this elevator, you'll do 4 - >  20 - >  3.\n\nSo, avoiding this elevator by only pressing the "down" button, you'll catch an elevator going down, and you'll do straight from 4 to 3.

[Ground truth Answer]
Example, Example, Example, Example, Answer

[Assistant's Response]
To address the question of why elevators have "up" and "down" call buttons when passengers can select any floor inside the elevator, we can analyze the provided long-form answer and categorize the sentences based on their roles.

1. **Organizational Sentence**: There is no clear organizational sentence in the provided response. An effective organizational sentence would typically outline how the answer will be structured or what aspects will be covered.

2. **Auxiliary Information**: Again, there is no auxiliary information present that provides context or additional details relevant to the main question.

3. **Answer**: The core answers to the question lie in the last two sentences:
   - "If you pick this elevator, you'll do 4 -> 20 -> 3."
   - "So, avoiding this elevator by only pressing the 'down' button, you'll catch an elevator going down, and you'll do straight from 4 to 3."
   These sentences explain that choosing an elevator that is already going to a higher floor can lead to unnecessary stops, while using the call buttons allows for more direct travel to the desired floor.

4. **Example**: The sentences that serve as examples include:
   - "Imagine you're in a building with 20 floors." (This sets the scene for understanding the mechanics of elevator travel.)
   - "Someone in floor 2 decided to click 'floor 20', so the elevator isn't gonna stop going up until it hits floor 20." (This illustrates the impact of someone selecting a higher floor on the elevator's route.)
   - "Let's say you're in floor 4 and want to go to floor 3." (This provides a specific scenario for clarity.)

5. **Miscellaneous**: The first sentence, "Too many messages in a row," does not contribute to the understanding of the question and can be classified as miscellaneous.

In summary, the response effectively illustrates the mechanics of elevator operation and the importance of call buttons through examples. However, it lacks an organizational sentence and auxiliary information that could enhance clarity and context. The call buttons are essential because they allow users to avoid unnecessary detours caused by other passengers' selections, enabling a more efficient journey to their desired floor.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: