You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


---
abstract: |
    We have conducted an optical long-slit spectroscopic survey of  galaxies using the 10m Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) at McDonald Observatory. The main goal of the HET Massive Galaxy Survey (HETMGS) is to find nearby galaxies that are suitable for black hole mass measurements. In order to measure accurately the black hole mass, one should kinematically resolve the region where the black hole dominates the gravitational potential. For most galaxies, this region is much less than an arcsecond. Thus, black hole masses are best measured in nearby galaxies with telescopes that obtain high-spatial resolution. The HETMGS focuses on those galaxies predicted to have the largest sphere-of-influence, based on published stellar velocity dispersions or the galaxy fundamental plane. To ensure coverage over galaxy types, the survey targets those galaxies across a face-on projection of the fundamental plane. We present the sample selection and resulting data products from the long-slit observations, including central stellar kinematics and emission line ratios. The full dataset, including spectra and resolved kinematics, is available online. Additionally, we show that the current crop of black hole masses are highly biased towards dense galaxies and that especially large disks and low dispersion galaxies are under-represented. This survey provides the necessary groundwork for future systematic black hole mass measurement campaigns.\
    Data, including spectra, are available at [\\websiteurl](\websiteurl).
author:
- |
    Remco C. E. van den Bosch, Karl Gebhardt,\
    Kayhan Gültekin, Akin Y[i]{}ld[i]{}r[i]{}m and Jonelle L. Walsh
bibliography:
- 'smbh.bib'
title: 'Hunting for Supermassive Black Holes in Nearby Galaxies with the Hobby-Eberly Telescope'
---

HET Massive Galaxy Survey
=========================

The masses of black holes, , correlate to various properties of their host galaxies. These correlations are the foundation for theories of the (co-)evolution of supermassive black holes and their host galaxies. See for a recent review. [The most commonly used black hole scaling relations are with stellar velocity dispersion [; @2000ApJ...539L..13G; @2000ApJ...539L...9F], bulge mass [; @2004ApJ...604L..89H], bulge luminosity [; @2011MNRAS.413.1479S], and total luminosity [; @2014ApJ...780...70L].]{} Theories on the existence of these scaling relations range from causal links through direct feedback between the black hole and its host [@1999MNRAS.308L..39F] to a non-causal origin from random hierarchical galaxy-galaxy merging [@2011ApJ...734...92J]. Another possibility is that the black hole scaling relation only holds for elliptical galaxies and bulges [@2011Natur.469..374K]. However not enough black hole masses have been measured to place firm constraints on these hypotheses. Also note that the  and  not mutually consistent for the biggest black holes [@2007ApJ...670..249L]. The main issue, besides small numbers, is that the host galaxy properties only span a small physical range, which is too small to discern between different scenarios, due to measurement uncertainties and the large intrinsic scatter in these relations.

In addition, the black hole masses of nearby galaxies are critically important for black hole mass determinations at higher redshift. The mass measurements from quasars and active galactic nuclei (AGNs) are measured using reverberation mapping (and its secondary methods), which rely on an empirical calibration that assumes that active black holes follow the local potentially biased  relation [@2010ApJ...716..269W].

Very few galaxies are close enough for direct black hole mass measurements. For a successful measurement, the central region of the galaxy where the potential of the black hole dominates needs to be spatially resolved ($\RoI$ $\equiv G$$\sigma^{-2}$, see § \[sec:the\_soi\_criterium\]). Even for the closest galaxies, the  is typically much smaller than 1. Hence, black hole masses can only be measured by telescope with the highest spatial resolution, such as the *Hubble Space Telescope* (*HST*), large ground-based telescopes assisted by adaptive optics, and radio facilities such as the Very Long Baseline Interferometry Network.

In order to make best use of high spatial resolution facilities, the potential targets for future black hole mass measurements need to be carefully chosen. However, most nearby galaxies (with distances $<140$ Mpc) do not have any spectra available, without which it is impossible to ascertain their suitability for expensive high spatial resolution follow-up. Even if spectra are available, the amalgamated literature in the HyperLeda database is often unreliable (see § \[sec:kinematics\_comparison\]).

The HET Massive Galaxy Survey (HETMGS) aims to find those galaxies that are suitable for a dynamical black hole mass measurement. The survey was a large program on the Hobby-Eberly Telescope [HET; @1998SPIE.3352...34R] that operated for 10 trimesters and obtained spectra of  galaxies. While the spatial resolution of the HET observations are typically not good enough to measure the black hole masses, this survey lays the necessary groundwork for systematic black hole mass measurement campaigns. As a by-product, the survey also provides a census of the nearest galaxies.

This survey is ideally suited for the unique design of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope. The 10-meter mirror is spherical and has a fixed elevation angle of 55. The primary mirror is stationary during observations and objects are tracked by moving the optics and instruments in prime focus. The telescope can only point to a fraction of the sky at any given time. The visible ‘doughnut’ is 8.4 thick. As a target passes through the donut, the telescope can track it for approximately one hour, depending on the declination of the object. The telescope design makes it most suited for programs that have short exposures and have many targets distributed across the sky. All observations are executed by night operators to optimize the science output. The scheduling algorithm is highly flexible and continually ranks all objects in the queue by score from the time allocation committee, visibility, observing conditions, etc. This allows the resident astronomer to adapt to current conditions in real-time. For details see [@2007PASP..119..556S].

This paper starts with the description of the survey, sample construction, and completeness metrics in § \[sec:selection\_method\]–\[sec:special\_targets\]. Then, the data reduction is described in § \[sec:marcario\_low\_resolution\_spectrograph\_data\_reduction\]. The primary data product is the stellar velocity dispersion since this is required to predict the . Subsequently, these dispersion measurements are validated in § \[sec:kinematics\_comparison\]. When no literature dispersion is available a priori, the  can be estimated from the photometry using the fundamental plane that relates galaxy size, surface brightness, and velocity dispersion, and a custom fit of this fundamental plane is presented in § \[sec:dispersion\_estimates\_from\_fundamental\_plane\]. The global properties of the HETMGS sample are described in § \[sec:HETgalaxies\]. Then, in § \[sec:sigmaevssigmac\], we explore whether the galaxy’s central velocity dispersion or an average velocity dispersion within the galaxy’s half-light radius correlates more strongly with black hole mass. In § \[sec:black\_hole\_scaling\_relations\] we compare the black-hole–host-galaxy demographics with the HETMGS sample and show that the host galaxies currently on the scaling relations are strongly clustered and biased toward the densest galaxies. We also look at the distribution of galaxies with large , and find that there are very few galaxies for which an under-massive black hole could be detected. Finally, we conclude in § \[sec:conclusions\] with a discussion of future prospects.

Survey Design {#sec:selection_method}
=============

![image](figures/HETtime){width="90.00000%"}

The survey ran from April 2010 to August 2013 (when the telescope was taken down for a major upgrade for HETDEX). The total survey consists of  galaxies, with 1265 long-slit spectra taken over 550 hours. Initially, we focused on galaxies with the largest dispersion. As the survey progressed the criteria on target selection were gradually relaxed and targets with lower dispersions and  were added to the queue (§ \[sec:msigmasel\]). This time dependence is shown in Figure \[fig:hettime\]. The target selection was continually expanded and improved over the survey life time. Below, we summarize the general overview and strategy, and in the subsections that follow, we describe the target selection in detail. § \[sec:Parentsample\] details the parent sample used to select targets. In particular, § \[sec:the\_soi\_criterium\] describes the adopted  metric, which defines the suitability for a black hole mass measurement. The main metric of success for the survey is to find the galaxies with the largest predicted , and we quantify this in § \[sec:msigmasel\]. Subsequently, we detail the success of the secondary goal of sampling all possible host galaxy properties in § \[sec:sampling\_all\_sizes\]. Lastly, the survey also includes special galaxies, such as those with previously measured black hole masses. These galaxies are described in § \[sec:special\_targets\]. All observations and the derived galaxy parameters from the survey are presented in Table \[tab:hetmgs\], and are also available from the project website at [\\websiteurl](\websiteurl).

At the start of each new trimester, we submitted a fresh set of targets. Afterwards the target list was updated about once every 6 weeks in order to account for holes in Local Sidereal Time (LST) in our *and* the overall telescope queue. New observations were processed as the survey progressed, which were then used to optimally select and schedule future targets. During the survey we gradually optimized the target selection and queuing. In the end, the algorithm was very sophisticated: it backfilled the queue with low priority objects in undersubscribed LSTs, while making sure that these new targets did not conflict with our own high priority targets. The algorithm also ensured that both rising and setting targets were available at any time, to work with pointing restrictions (e.g., limitations due to high wind). By always having targets available, our program could capitalize on undersubscribed times in the queue.

We do not select galaxies to observe based on their morphology. The only exception is to exclude strongly interacting galaxies and those that are too large to fit in the 8 slit. All HETMGS galaxies are within the telescope’s declination limit of $-11<\delta<73$, and we minimized target overlap with the SAURON [@2002MNRAS.329..513D],  [@2011MNRAS.413..813C] and   surveys, as their integral field unit (IFU) observations are of a higher quality and publicly available. The observed sample is not complete since it was scheduled as a low priority filler program.

Parent sample {#sec:Parentsample}
-------------

The targets in the survey were selected from a (continually updated) parent sample which was constructed from 2MASS photometry and literature velocity dispersions. We chose the 2MASS Extended Source Catalog [XSC; @2000AJ....119.2498J] as it is the best all-sky catalog of extended sources that is currently available. It is deep enough to include all the nearby galaxies for which direct black hole masses can be robustly measured. Additionally, the catalog contains many useful parameters such as half-light radius ($R_e$), position angle (PA), and flattening.

Note that the 2MASS observations are relatively shallow and the XSC is known to underestimate the total flux of apparently large, faint or low-surface-brightness objects by an appreciable amount . Furthermore, the half-light radii are measured over circular apertures and are not corrected for the effect of beam smearing. As a result many objects with a full width at half maximum (FWHM) smaller than 25 are overestimated in size.\[sec:2masscaveat\]

The parent sample needs to include all possible targets, and must therefore be much larger than the survey itself. From the XSC all  objects were selected that have apparent $K_s$ magnitudes (<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">K\_M\_EXT</span>) within the range $5<m_{Ks}<11$. Fainter galaxies are expected to have a  that cannot be resolved. For an apparent brightness of $m_{Ks}=11$ the largest expected  in the parent sample is 004 when adopting the  relation and the fundamental plane from § \[sec:dispersion\_estimates\_from\_fundamental\_plane\]. Current state-of-the-art adaptive optics reaches 01 FWHM and the $m_{Ks}=11$ limit of the parent sample is thus sufficient.

The parent sample is further augmented with velocity dispersions from various literature sources. We added the 7800 literature velocity dispersions that were available from the HyperLeda database in early 2011. The two biggest sources in that database are [@1995ApJS..100..105M] and [@1999MNRAS.305..259W]. Out of the 7800 galaxies, 4600 were not in our parent sample. (Most of these are fainter than $m_{Ks}>11$.) This increased the total size of the parent sample to  objects. We cross-matched the resulting catalog with SDSS NYU Value Added Catalog [@2005AJ....129.2562B; @2008ApJS..175..297A] which added another 4500 stellar velocity dispersions to the parent sample.

We added redshift distances from the NASA Extragalactic Database (NED) and the 2MASS redshift survey [@2012ApJS..199...26H] and redshift-independent distances from NED-1D. For the redshift distances we use $H_0=70.5$  from [@2009ApJS..180..330K] and the reference frame from [@2000ApJ...529..786M], which corrects for Virgo infall, the Great Attractor, and the Shapley supercluster. Almost all galaxies in the parent sample have estimated distances. Out of the parent sample 12% of the objects have no associated redshift, but this reduces to 0.7% when objects near the galactic plane ($|b|<5$), large extinction ($A_b>2$) and non-galaxy-like colors ($0.75>J-K>1.25$) are removed [see also @2012ApJS..199...26H]. For each object, the amount of Galactic foreground extinction was determined using the 100 $\mu\mathrm{m}$ dust maps from [@1998ApJ...500..525S].

The Sphere of Influence {#sec:the_soi_criterium}
-----------------------

For survey target selection, we need to adopt a criteria for determining the suitability of a galaxy for a black hole mass measurement. The mass of the black hole at the center of galaxies can best be determined by spatially resolving the kinematics near the black hole, using tracers like rotating gas or stars. The closer the tracer is to the black hole, the more accurate the measurement. Ideally, the region where the gravitational forces of the black hole dominates over the rest of the galaxy should be probed. The size of this sphere of influence is usually[^1] defined as $\RoI$ $\equiv G$$\sigma^{-2}$. Given distance $D$, the apparent size of the sphere of influence is then $=\RoI D^{-1}$. This definition is derived from the virial theorem by assuming a spherical geometry and isotropy near the black hole [@1972ApJ...178..371P]. Sometimes a less conservative definition is adopted that uses the diameter instead of the radius [e.g., @2004ApJ...602...66V].

The definition of  is very convenient, especially when planning observations where the black hole mass is not yet known a priori. By adopting a black hole scaling relation, the  can be estimated and the feasibility of proposed observations can be evaluated. The most practical scaling relation for this purpose is , which yields a prediction for the  $= G\sigma^{2.5}D^{-1}$, when adopting a slope of 4.5 in  from [@2009ApJ...698..198G]. As a result, the sphere of influence can be predicted with just a distance and a velocity dispersion as input. Note that  is just a prediction; it depends on the adopted scaling relations and the true  can only be known once the black hole mass has been measured. Throughout this paper  is repeatedly used, and it always refers to the *predicted* , unless the black hole mass has been measured.

The  relation is the only practical black hole mass proxy available. Other scaling relations have larger intrinsic scatter or require a more detailed analysis of the host galaxy. For example, the  relation relies on bulge–disc decompositions. As such the resulting measurement of bulge luminosity is often very degenerate [@2014ApJ...780...69L] and cannot be robustly determined with an simple algorithm that can be applied to a large data set. Hence it is impractical to use the bulge luminosity to select targets. On the other hand, the velocity dispersion $\sigma$ can be measured cleanly. Furthermore, the  relation also yields a smaller—more conservative—estimate of  than expected from the  relation (See § \[sec:soi\_distribution\]). Many other scaling relations exist, [e.g., @2007ApJ...665..120A; @2012ApJ...746..113G; @2007ApJ...669...67H; @2012ApJ...746..113G], but those are not a significant improvement of . In practice, such alternative predictors would have targeted much the same galaxies. See § \[sec:black\_hole\_scaling\_relations\] for a direct comparison with .

Sphere of influence completeness {#sec:msigmasel}
--------------------------------

![image](figures/hetsois){width="100.00000%"}

The survey originally started by targeting the 65 galaxies with highest literature dispersions $\sigma > 270 $  and  $\theta_i>$01 solely based on the HyperLeda database. We adopt the  parameters from [@2009ApJ...698..198G] to estimate the . As the survey progressed and transitioned into a large program, these hard limits on $\sigma$ and  were gradually relaxed and additional sources were added (Figure \[fig:hettime\]).

The  of the  targeted galaxies *with* literature dispersions are shown in left panel of Figure \[fig:hetsois\]. Many of these literature dispersions turn out to be overestimated compared to the HETMGS measurements. Of the  observed galaxies with a predicted $\theta_i>$01 a significant percentage (%) turned out to have $\theta_i<$008. This is largely caused by the large uncertainties and systematics of the HyperLeda velocity dispersions, which is also apparent in Figure \[fig:hetvsvagcvshl\].

The middle panel of Figure \[fig:hetsois\] shows the  of all the  observed targets without literature dispersions. For the galaxies that did not have a literature velocity dispersion, the  was predicated by combining the  relation and a dispersion estimate from the fundamental plane from § \[sec:dispersion\_estimates\_from\_fundamental\_plane\]. These dispersion estimates are good enough to yield adequate predictions for $\theta_i$. When selecting targets this way, we omitted probable quasars that have both small sizes ($r_e<2$) and AGN-like colors ($0.75<J-K<1.25$). In total, we found  objects with  bigger than 01 that also did not have a velocity dispersion measurement in the literature.

The final survey include 95% and 50% of all galaxies with a  above  and , respectively (from the subset of galaxies in the parent sample, visible from the HET, and excluding galaxies with a known black hole mass and  data). The right panel of Figure \[fig:hetsois\] shows the predicted  of all the HETMGS observed galaxies based on our dispersions. The final sample contains  galaxies with a  greater than 01. Under the assumption that  is a reasonable predictor for black hole mass, the survey has satisfied its goal of finding almost all galaxies with a large in the parent sample.

The  is strongly coupled to galaxy dispersion ($\theta_i \propto \sigma^{2.5}$) and galaxies with large dispersions have the largest . Selecting galaxies based on largest , as is done here, is strongly biased towards galaxies with the largest densities. This is apparent as the strong clustering in Figure \[fig:2masspf\]. Many object in the survey are denser still than average early-type galaxies.

Sampling all sizes and surface brightnesses {#sec:sampling_all_sizes}
-------------------------------------------

If targets were selected merely on the largest possible  using the  relation, the survey would contain mostly dense (early-type) galaxies with dispersions over 200 , as these galaxies have the largest . This bias occurs because the most important term in  is $\sigma^{2.5}$. This is directly visible in figure \[fig:hetsois\], as the highest dispersion galaxies have the largest . The early-type galaxies are already over-represented in black hole studies and hence diversifying the parameter space to other types of galaxies would create leverage on the scaling relations. Especially to test the universality (e.g., spiral galaxies appear to have low black hole masses for their dispersions; @2010ApJ...721...26G [@2011ApJ...727...20K]).

To ensure that the survey is in not solely restricted to high dispersion galaxies, we need to employ an alternative way of selecting targets, independent from velocity dispersion. A good alternative would be to use use bulge luminosities, as that correlates very well with black hole mass also. However, the bulge luminosity is impractical; they require a photometric decomposition, to separate the disk and the bulge. Those decompositions are often very degenerate and require a lot of fine-tuning. Other desirable galaxy parameters, like optical ($g$-$r$) colours, are not available over the whole sky and can thus not be used when the distance (in Mpc) of the targets is key priority.

We chose to select additional targets by sampling in galaxy size and average surface brightness (). These two properties make up a near face-on projection of the fundamental plane ($R_e \propto \sigma_e^\alpha \Amu^\beta$, see §\[sec:dispersion\_estimates\_from\_fundamental\_plane\]) and is also independent of the (often unknown) velocity dispersion. For our purposes, surface brightness is a better choice than absolute luminosity, as the latter has a much tighter relation with galaxy size. This selection automatically ensures sampling across galaxy types, because Spiral galaxies occupy a different region on fundamental plane than early-type galaxies.

For a given set of galaxies with the same properties, the ones with the largest  will have the lowest distances (in Mpc). To diversify the sample in size $R_e$ and surface brightness $\Amu$, we only have to do a sampling in these two parameters and select the closest ones (in Mpc) at every given value-pair of $R_e$ and $\Amu$. We define a euclidian distance norm of $||x||:=\sqrt{\Delta \Amu^2+\Delta \log(R_e)^2}$, with  in units of mag$/$arcsec$^2$ and $R_e$ in kpc. This allows us to quantify our sampling in the $R_e$–$\Amu$ plane. In theory the strategy would be straightforward: Just select the nearest galaxies, until sufficient coverage is created. In practice, the targeting is dependent of what galaxies can be observed at the telescope in the remainder of the trimester. Hence we created an algorithm that would add the nearest (in Mpc) galaxies to our sample to would best enhance our coverage w.r.t the norm. This used an iterative method; Every time new targets were scheduled, we sorted the subsample of visible targets in order of increasing distance in Mpc. Then, we started with the nearest galaxy and checked if it had any nearer (in Mpc) neighbors with norm $||x|| < \epsilon$ among the previously observed and queued objects still visible in the remainder of the trimester. If not, then the galaxy is added to queue. As more galaxies were observed, we decreased $\epsilon$ in order to find enough observable targets. At the end of the survey $\epsilon$ was reduced to 0.07. The method was also the primary method for backfilling the undersubscribed LST slots in the telescope queue, by iterative shrinking $\epsilon$ until targets where found with the required LST.

This method is completely independent of the adopted black hole mass scaling relation, and it produces a survey sample that has the same extent in galaxy size and surface brightness as the parent sample (see Figure \[fig:2masspf\]). Furthermore, the selection method picks out the closest galaxies with the largest  for a set of galaxy properties. In the final survey, 90% of the galaxies have a neighbor within a norm of $||x||<$. Our procedure selected many nearby spirals galaxies that otherwise would not be included in the survey at all, including the most extreme galaxies such as the biggest and smallest spiral galaxies. Many of the galaxies selected this way are the low  objects seen in Figure \[fig:hetsois\].

Special targets {#sec:special_targets}
---------------

The survey also contains $\sim$150 special galaxies, which were targeted to create overlap with other black hole studies and allow for cross-calibration checks. These galaxies were drawn from a dedicated list, and were queued at an elevated priority. The red dots in the timeline in Figure \[fig:hettime\] represent the special galaxies, as reconstructed from the final list. Once observed, these objects were not treated differently in terms of data reduction or kinematic analysis, and are considered part of the total sample. All special galaxies are included in Table \[tab:hetmgs\] and the figures.

More specifically, the special targets include galaxies with direct black hole mass measurements from literature compilations and black hole estimates from [@2009ApJ...692..856B]. We observed  of the  Northern galaxies, with a known black hole mass. We also targeted galaxies for which black hole mass efforts are currently under way, but are yet unpublished (Greene, priv. comm., Krajnović, priv. comm., McConnell, priv. comm.). Most of those galaxies were already in the sample, and were previously selected, following the procedure outlined in § \[sec:the\_soi\_criterium\]. The primary reason to observe these objects is to create a homogeneous data set among the galaxies with known black hole masses. In § \[sec:sigmaevssigmac\], we use this homogeneity to show that the central dispersion, $\sigma_c$, can be used in .

One of the first results from the HETMGS is the discovery of compact galaxies that may host black holes weighing $\sim$10% of their host galaxy mass [@2012Natur.491..729V; @2013MNRAS.434L..31L; @WalshN1271; @Yildirim1]. These über-massive black hole candidates appear to be significantly more massive than expected based on their host galaxy’s luminosity. The host galaxies are relatively small and have high velocity dispersions for their (stellar) mass. In our survey, such objects are selected because they have large  due to their high dispersions and because of the diversity sampling from § \[sec:sampling\_all\_sizes\] that targets extreme galaxies. Nevertheless, we specifically targeted compact galaxies using a mass–size cut: $-6.91 - 0.29 M_{Ks} > \log(0.75 R_e)$. We further required that the galaxy have no previous velocity dispersion measurement, or a literature velocity dispersion value that was 20% higher than predicted from our fundamental plane calibration (see § \[sec:dispersion\_estimates\_from\_fundamental\_plane\]). This selection criteria produced about 30 targets. Overall, there are 200 galaxies below this mass–size cut in the survey. A full analysis and discussion of these compact galaxy systems is outside of the scope of this paper.

Marcario Low Resolution Spectrograph data reduction {#sec:marcario_low_resolution_spectrograph_data_reduction}
===================================================

![image](figures/lrs140733-15-NGC5228B-flat_fits_gandalf){width="95.00000%"}

All the observations were taken with the Marcario Low Resolution Spectrograph [LRS; @1998SPIE.3355..375H], which is an optical long-slit spectrograph with a slit length of 4 and a 3k$\times$1k CCD. We used the g2 grating, which covers 4200–7400 Å, and the default 2$\times$2 binning. This setup provides an instrumental resolution of 4.8 Å (7.5 Å) FWHM, or a dispersion of 108 (180 ) for the 1–wide (2–wide) slit, as measured from the 5577 Å night sky line. When practical, we aligned the slit on the major axis and centered it on the galaxy. During each visit, we obtained a single 15 minute exposure. The typical spatial resolution of the observations is 25 FWHM.

The observations and calibration data were retrieved and processed using a dedicated pipeline written in IDL[^2]. The pipeline is fully automated and executes a series of basic steps. First, the spurious pixels in each exposure are masked using a bad pixel map, and cosmic rays are masked using PyCosmic . The frames are overscan and bias subtracted, and then flat fielded. The next step is a direct interpolation onto a frame that is linear in the spatial dimension and logarithmic in the wavelength dimension, using a spatial distortion map from a pinhole exposure and the wavelength solution from nightly arc lamp exposures. A variance (error) frame is propagated in the same way. During each exposure, the effective aperture of the HET continually changes because the prime-focus optics move to track an object, thereby affecting the throughput along the spatial direction. These throughput changes are measured in each science exposure using the apparent brightness of the sky lines along the slit. For this reason, we do not attempt to perform absolute or relative flux calibration[^3], and no attempt was made to measure the absolute emission-line fluxes.

The data products, presented in Table \[tab:hetmgs\], include the following quantities: heliocentric velocity, stellar absorption line velocity dispersions, the emission line ratios \[\]/H$\alpha$ and \[\]/H$\beta$, and their uncertainties. These quantities are all measured within a 35 aperture centered on the brightest pixel in the slit. For the stellar kinematics, the pipeline fits the stellar continuum with the pixel-fitting code [pPXF; @2004PASP..116..138C] using template stars from MILES . Inside the central aperture the Signal-to-Noise ratio (S/N) is typically over 100, resulting in robust stellar kinematic measurements, as shown in § \[sec:kinematics\_comparison\]. The fit to each (central) galaxy spectrum is manually inspected to find systematics and errors. An example spectrum is shown in figure \[fig:spectrum\].

The stellar kinematic extraction is obtained from the stellar continuum in an observed window of 5000 – 6100 Å, selected to minimise instrumental resolution changes across the slit. Additionally all regions with possible contamination from emission lines were masked. For the both the stellar kinematics and emission-line extraction, we apply multiplicative (<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">mdegree</span>) and additive polynomials (<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">degree</span>) of degree 25 and 5, respectively, to the template stars to match the continuum and account for dust, AGN light and the (absence of) flux calibration. [The number of polynomials is chosen to be large enough to be able to compensate for (uncommon) issues with the uneven flat fields. In the next section, we show that our kinematics are robust.]{}

The sky is measured in two large bins on each end of the slit, and were added as a sky-template to pPXF to do the sky subtraction. For the emission-line fit we use all the 1000 template stars in the MILES library and the full wavelength range available. For the stellar kinematics, we construct a single composite template by first fitting the full wavelength range using a subset of 90 stars that get used most frequently in all the aforementioned emission line extractions. Adding more stars increases the computational time and does not change the derived values. Typically 20 stars get a non-zero weight in the initial pPXF fit. The uncertainties on the stellar kinematics were computed by running a 100-iteration Monte-Carlo in which the flux is randomly perturbed and with a single composite template. During the Monte-Carlo the instrumental dispersion of the composite template is also perturbed, which insures realistic uncertainties when the galaxy dispersion is unresolved. The mean and standard deviation of the Monte-Carlo run are adopted as the measured value and the formal 1$\sigma$ uncertainty.

When present, emission lines are obtained using GANDALF [@2006MNRAS.366.1151S]. An example GANDALF fit is shown in figure \[fig:spectrum\]. We consider an emission as detected when the residuals underneath the line are 4 times lower than the amplitude of the line [Amplitude-over-Noise AoN$>$4; see @2006MNRAS.366.1151S]. The errors on the emission lines are directly computed by GANDALF. The \[\] emission lines often overlap with a broad telluric feature, and therefor are not included in Table \[tab:hetmgs\].

The survey contains  galaxies with broad emission lines, which are presumably AGN. The dispersion for these objects could not be reliably measured in the central aperture, as the stellar continuum is washed out. Instead, an attempt was made to measure the dispersion using a larger aperture and masking the nucleus. Such objects are flagged in Table \[tab:hetmgs\] as AGN.

Most observations were deep enough that spatially resolved kinematics could be extracted as well, allowing us to measure rotation curves and velocity dispersion profiles. To ensure adequate signal for the stellar kinematics extraction, we combine spatial rows into bins with a minimum S/N of 25. An example is shown in figure \[fig:kinematics\]. The kinematics are available from the project website at survey website [\\websiteurl](\websiteurl).

Kinematics Comparison {#sec:kinematics_comparison}
=====================

There is a large overlap between the HETMGS and other spectroscopic surveys, which we use to validate our heliocentric velocities and stellar velocity dispersions. The SDSS survey provides a good comparison, as these homogeneous measurements all come from the same instrument and its 3 fibers are approximately the same size as our pseudo-apertures from the HET long slit. There are  galaxies in common with SDSS and there is excellent agreement with their dispersion measurements, as shown in Figure \[fig:hetvsvagcvshl\]. The standard deviation of the relative difference between the two dataset is only %. Which is smaller than the % relative uncertainty of the HETMGS errors of the same subset. Such small differences are consistent with the expected systematics due to the changes in seeing and positioning of the apertures of the different telescopes.

The velocity dispersions from HyperLeda are much less reliable, as this database consists of amalgamated literature. The  galaxies in common have a standard deviation in the difference of 16% or $30$ . It is noteworthy that HyperLeda values over 300  are commonly too large by a significant amount, as seen in Figure \[fig:hetvsvagcvshl\]. There is an overlap of  galaxies between SDSS and HyperLeda, and the comparison between the two data sets shows the same trend. These biases and large uncertainties need to be taken into account when preparing observations with HyperLeda.

The Palomar survey by [@2009ApJS..183....1H] published velocity dispersions for the 428 galaxies with the largest apparent brightnesses. These values were not yet included in the HyperLeda database when the parent sample was constructed. There are 188 galaxies that overlap for which were find agreement that is similar to that of the HyperLeda sample: the standard deviation of the difference is 17%.

The SDSS redshifts are very precise with a formal uncertainty of  . In the cross-matched sample between HETMGS and SDSS the mean difference between the heliocentric velocities is   with a standard deviation of  . The redshift comparison with the rest of the parent sample shows a larger offset: their mean and standard deviation are $\HETVELmean$ and  , respectively. In rotating galaxies the mean velocity changes rapidly near the center, and thus these kinematic offsets are expected just based on small positional offsets.

The Fundamental plane as dispersion predictor {#sec:dispersion_estimates_from_fundamental_plane}
=============================================

For the target selection we need an estimate of . However most of the galaxies in the parent sample do not have a literature stellar velocity dispersion measurement, which is required to compute their . In those cases the fundamental plane $R_e \propto \sigma^\alpha \Amu^\beta$—the relation between galaxy size, surface brightness and dispersion—can be employed to estimate their dispersion. To get dispersion estimates, we fitted a fundamental plane to the combination of XSC photometry and the SDSS and HETMGS dispersions. After some experimentation, the best results were achieved with the 2MASS catalog values for the half light radius $R_e$ (<span style="font-variant:small-caps;">K\_R\_EFF</span>) and effective surface brightness ($\Amu=\mathrm{K\_M\_EXT}+A_K+2.5 \log(2\pi R_e) +0.394$) combined with the dispersion from the HETMGS and the SDSS galaxies within 140 Mpc. With this dataset, a robust quartic fit from <span style="font-variant:small-caps;">ROBLIB</span> yields a fundamental surface that predict the velocity dispersion of all the galaxies in our parent sample with an RMS error of 0.09 dex. The residuals, shown in figure \[fig:sigmapred\], do not show systematic biases, which is remarkable as the sample contains both early and Late type galaxies. And the fundamental plane is normally only used for early types. Our fundamental plane parameters are a significant improvement over the parameters from [@1998AJ....116.1591P], which has an RMS error of 0.2 dex on this data set, and only includes ETGs.

A flat plane fit resulted in larger residuals and a systematic bias for the largest dispersion galaxies, which is unfortunate as they are the highest priority targets of the HETMGS. The curvature in our quartic surface is not very strong, as seen in figure \[fig:2masspf\]. [The coefficients of the surface fit are .]{}

For the survey, only the predictive power of the fundamental plane is important. The functional form is irrelevant, as long as the dispersion is predicted reliably. Nonetheless, it is remarkable the fundamental plane derived from photometry of the 2MASS XSC catalog has so little scatter. A full treatment of a 2MASS fundamental plane is outside of the scope of this paper, but see [@2012MNRAS.427..245M] for a near-infrared study based on $10^4$ early types from 6dFGS, and also see [@2011MNRAS.417.1787F] for a near-IR fundamental plane that includes both early- and late type galaxies from the SAURON survey.

During the target selection process, the dispersion estimated from the fundamental plane is used when no literature dispersion measurement is available. Velocity dispersion predictions over 410  were truncated, as such galaxies are not expected to exist, nor found in our survey. In practice most of these objects turn out to be quasars.

The HETMGS galaxies {#sec:HETgalaxies}
===================

With  galaxies, the HETMGS survey is the largest galaxy survey with spatially resolved spectroscopy to date. The final sample has a median distance of  Mpc and all available combinations of galaxy size, luminosity, and dispersions, as shown in figure \[fig:Sample\]. The survey is representative of the local volume above a M$_k < -21$, and sizes of 0.5 kpc. The survey is strongly weighted towards the densest galaxies. This is apparent in the mass-size panel. Those objects have the highest dispersions, which is the most important factor for the  ($\SoI \propto \sigma^{2.5}/D$). The sample contains about 30% late type galaxies, based on the galaxy morphology identifiers from HyperLeda.

There is a significant amount of overlap between the HETMGS and other surveys. Between ,  mother-sample, SDSS and the Palomar survey, there is 56, 83,  and 188 galaxies overlap. However all these samples are very different. For example, the Palomar spectroscopic survey [@2009ApJS..183....1H] contains 426 velocity dispersions for the brightest galaxies with apparent magnitudes of $B < 12.5$. The SDSS only includes a (small) fraction of the nearby galaxies [@2008ApJS..175..297A]. And the 600  galaxies are selected within $0.005<z<0.03$ and are typically too far away for a black hole mass measurement . The 260  [@2011MNRAS.413..813C] galaxies includes all the massive early-type galaxies inside 24 Mpc, but misses large luminosity galaxies due to cosmic variance. The comparison of galaxy properties between HETMGS and  and  is shown in Figure \[fig:2masspf\].

Emission lines are quite common in the centers of galaxies, often caused by star formation, shocks or accreting black holes. These phenomena can occur at the same time . In one third of the survey, central emission lines are detected. This includes the  broad line AGNs, and 203, 140 and 290 objects of that are classified as Seyfert, LINER and HII star formation, according to the classification scheme devised by [@2006MNRAS.372..961K]. But note that we do not specifically attempt to detect (weak) broad line components with the GANDALF. The AGNs can vary substantially on both long and short time scales. One such dramatic example, reported in [@2014arXiv1404.4879D], is Mrk 590 in which the broad lines have all but disappeared. The HETMGS spectra could be used as baseline for other synpotic AGN studies.

Central dispersion or average dispersion? {#sec:sigmaevssigmac}
=========================================

What correlates better with black hole mass: the central dispersion $\sigma_c$ or the luminosity weighted dispersion inside a half-light radius $\sigma_e$? The first one is more easily measured, but probes an seemingly arbitrary scale of the galaxy, that depends on distance and instrumental effects. Whereas $\sigma_e$ is measured[^4] inside a physically relevant aperture ($R_e$) and is also the quantity used for the fundamental plane and virial galaxy masses. Different apertures for $\sigma$ have been used in the literature. For example, [@2011Natur.480..215M] has suggested that the central region near the black hole should excluded from the $\sigma_e$ estimate, while [@2013ApJ...772...49W] argues for the use of a $\sigma$ that only contains half of the second moment. Furthermore the known black hole masses themselves are strongly correlated with distance, with bigger black holes being further away. Given that $\sigma_c$ is the most commonly available quantity it is useful to know if and how it correlates with black hole mass.

The difference between $\sigma_c$ and $\sigma_e$ is most interesting for disk galaxies where these two measurements probe very different things. Consider the broad-line AGNs in bulge-less disks galaxies [@2010ApJ...721...26G; @2013MNRAS.429.2199S; @2013ApJ...775..116R]. For these systems, [@2011Natur.469..374K] argues that neither  and  should apply to these galaxies, however their AGN is proof that they host a black hole. Is there perhaps another scaling relation that is applicable for these systems? If the black hole mass is solely linked to the bulge [e.g. @2013ApJ...772...49W], then one would expect that the $\sigma_e$ of a disk dominated galaxy should not correlate with black hole mass, whereas $\sigma_c$ should correlate better as it is a good tracer of the (central) bulge component. A homogenous dataset allows for a systematic test of all such scenarios.

For the purpose of the survey, we are predominantly interested in whether the $\sigma_c$ is a good predictor of black hole mass. [@2009ApJ...698..198G] found their dataset to be consistent with $\sigma_c=\sigma_e$, with an RMS scatter of 22 . But this warrants repeating with the homogeneous dispersions from the HETMGS and the literature updates to $\sigma_e$ (e.g. ). For this comparison we use $\sigma_c$ as measured in the central HETMGS 35 aperture (See §\[sec:marcario\_low\_resolution\_spectrograph\_data\_reduction\]) and $\sigma_e$ as tabulated in or [@2013ApJ...764..184M]. There are  galaxies with a $\sigma_c$ and a black hole mass in this survey. The comparison is shown in figure \[fig:centralsig\]. Using a linear regression [LINMIXERR, @2007ApJ...665.1489K], we find  . The slope is inconsistent with being unity and is also inconsistent with the regression from [@2009ApJ...698..198G]. The $\sigma_c$ is higher for higher dispersion galaxies and lower for the disk-dominated galaxies with low dispersions.

Using the same subset of  galaxies and LINMIXERR the  and  relations are: $(\alpha, \beta, \epsilon_0)=$ , with $\log( M_\bullet/ $$ )=\alpha + \beta \log(\sigma/200 $$)$, where $\epsilon_0$ is the intrinsic scatter. The two relations are nearly identical, apart from a slightly shallower slope with the central dispersion, as expected from the correlation between $\sigma_c$ and $\sigma_e$. So both velocity dispersion measures can be used to predict black hole mass. Our  relation is not consistent with the $\beta=4.38$ from , because we did not exclude pseudo-bulges (see their §6.6.2). Our –$\sigma_e$ relation is consistent with [@2013ApJ...764..184M].

We conclude that $\sigma_c$ can indeed be used as a substitute in , albeit with a steeper gradient. [In the survey we used  from [@2009ApJ...698..198G] for the target selection (§\[sec:msigmasel\]), which has a shallower slope. The difference with   is not very big, as seen in figure \[fig:MLlimits\]. If we had  for target selection instead, the survey would have favored higher dispersion galaxies at larger distances, as this relation predicts bigger black holes for the highest dispersion galaxies. However those galaxies were already included in the survey, as they already have the largest  anyways. The completeness statistics therefor would not differ appreciably with the . The biggest change would be a decrease of $\sim30$% of the  of low dispersion galaxies in the survey ($\sigma_c < 150$ ). ]{}

Black Hole Demography {#sec:soi_distribution}
=====================

![image](figures/HETbhlimit){width="100.00000%"}

\[sec:black\_hole\_scaling\_relations\]

Galaxies with black hole measurements, hereafter referred to as host galaxies, have properties that are biased in comparison to the galaxy population as a whole. This is evident from the distribution of host galaxy properties versus the galaxy population, shown in figure \[fig:Sample\]. It is striking how the host galaxies trace out a very narrow locus in this parameter space. This is most obvious in the luminosity–size panel, where they lie along a narrow line, sampling preferentially the densest galaxies. Notice that the black hole host galaxies are typically denser than the average (early-type) galaxies. This severely hinders a robust measurement of the coefficients of higher dimensional scaling relations or non-linear scaling relations.

Target galaxies that can challenge the scaling relations are most interesting, especially if they can be shown to have black holes smaller than predicted from the scaling relations. For a given spatial resolution $\theta_t$, the black hole mass detection threshold $M_t$ can be defined as $M_t\equiv G^{-1} \theta_t D\sigma_c^{-2}$ by inverting the  criterion (§\[sec:the\_soi\_criterium\]). This inversion is independent of any scaling relation and can thus be used to select galaxies that can challenge a particular scaling relation. Note that for a given host galaxy it is easier to detect an over-massive black hole, as its  is exponentially easier to resolve.

In figure \[fig:MLlimits\] these lower limits are shown for  and . It is notable that the detection threshold overlaps with the existing black hole measurements on . This fact raises the question of whether or not the  relation can indeed be constrained at all. In particular, [@2010ApJ...711L.108B] posed that the  could just be an upper envelope relation. [@2011ApJ...738...17G] argued that such analysis does not take into account the relative scarcity of upper limits to black hole masses compared to the number of detections. Because the value of the black hole mass is unknown before measuring it, an upper envelope relation would predict many more upper limits than detections at a fixed velocity dispersion and distance; instead the opposite is found. When using information from upper limits and detected black hole masses, @2011ApJ...738...17G found the relation to be best described by a ridge-line relation and could rule out the upper envelope relation at $>99\%$ confidence. It is also clear that highly accurate black hole masses are needed to secure  at the low dispersion end. There is not a significant number of new galaxies in the survey with extremely large  to help discriminate between these two scenarios. There are no galaxies with a  bigger than 0.1 and a dispersion below 90 . Hence very few mass measurements exist for such low dispersion galaxies [but see @2002ApJ...567..237S; @2009ApJ...692..856B].

The  and  relation have a similar issue at high luminosity. There are no high luminosity galaxies nearby enough for the detection of an under-massive black hole. In figure \[fig:MLlimits\] we show the lowest black hole masses that can be detected as a function of total luminosity. This is conservative, as only considering the bulge would decrease the luminosity, but does not change the black hole mass detection threshold[^5]. If luminous early types with small $10^6$  black holes exist, we would not be able to detect them [e.g. @2011ApJ...741...38G]. There is a distinct lack of high luminosity galaxies in which a low mass black hole could be detected. This is because the closest large luminosity ellipticals are in Virgo at a distance of 14 Mpc, with the exception of Maffei I (UGCA034). The  predicts relatively massive black holes for the nearby spirals. These galaxies do not to host large bulges [@2010ApJ...723...54K] and are thus ideal to distinguish between ,  and , as even an upper-limit would provide strongly leverage on .

Looking Ahead {#sec:conclusions}
=============

This paper introduces the HET Massive Galaxy Survey, which consists of long slit spectroscopy of  nearby galaxies. The surveyed galaxies were specifically chosen for their potential for a direct dynamical black hole mass measurement. By selecting galaxies with large , the survey provides the most complete prerequisite sample for future dynamical black hole mass measurements in the local volume. Other nearby galaxy surveys do not (specifically) probe galaxies that are nearby enough for black hole mass measurements and the HETMGS is thus complementary. The survey improves many velocity dispersion measurements present in the the HyperLeda catalog (§\[sec:kinematics\_comparison\]), which is often used as the basis for black hole mass measurements. The sample is very diverse and spans a large range in luminosity, size, dispersion and galaxy morphology (§\[sec:HETgalaxies\]). The central stellar kinematics and emission line ratios are the survey’s primary data products and are presented in table \[tab:hetmgs\]. The HET observations have been used in the following papers [@2012Natur.491..729V], [@2013MNRAS.434L..31L], [@WalshN1271] and [@Yildirim1].

Currently there are only 90 galaxies with direct black hole masses measurements and the existing data do not favor a specific black hole scaling relation over another . This in part a result of the fact that the host galaxies are heavily biased and sample only the densest of galaxies, which is not representative of the galaxy population at large (§\[sec:black\_hole\_scaling\_relations\]). They are also strongly clustered in luminosity and size. Expanding black hole mass measurements to be more representative of the galaxy population, will greatly extend the leverage on the black hole scaling relations. This is currently an active field, with different teams pursuing different parts of parameter space [@2012ApJ...756..179M; @2010MNRAS.403..646N; @2013AJ....146...45R; @2009MNRAS.399.1839K; @2012Natur.491..729V; @2014Natur.513..398S; @2011ApJ...727...20K; @WalshN1271]. Even with all the progress, the current crop of black hole masses is still confined to a narrow range of host galaxy properties. Unfortunately, the HETMGS survey shows that the potential targets are not very numerous. The black hole scaling relations are thus strongly limited by the detection thresholds set by angular resolution of telescopes. The increased spatial resolution offered by VLBI [@2011ApJ...727...20K], ALMA [@2014arXiv1406.2555D] and the ELTs [@2014AJ....147...93D] are crucial to resolve the  of low-mass black holes.

Also important are the the cross-calibrations between methods. These are crucial to independently verify the intrinsic uncertainties. Unfortunately, there are few objects where two or more of the main methods—gas dynamics, stellar dynamics, megamasers, and reverberation mapping—can be applied. The lack of such comparable measurements is a result of the different requirements that each method has concerning host galaxy properties. Comparisons between gas and stellar dynamical black hole masses have been done for only six objects [@2013ApJ...770...86W and references therein]. In half of those cases the gas dynamical masses are lower by at least a factor of two for reasons yet unknown. So far only NGC4151 has both a dynamical and reverberation mass. However its stellar kinematics are strongly affected by the spiral perturbations and complex bar kinematics [@2007ApJ...670..105O; @2014ApJ...791...37O]. Comparison targets of megamasers galaxies are similarly rare [@2009ApJ...693..946S]. The HETMGS can be the starting point for finding new cross-calibration targets.

The first result of the HETMGS survey was the discovery of six extremely compact, high-dispersion, galaxies which are candidates to host black holes that are too large for their galaxy mass [@2012Natur.491..729V; @2013MNRAS.431L..38F; @2013MNRAS.433.1862E]. Apart from NGC1277, [@WalshN1271] found another compact galaxy with a over-massive black hole in the HETMGS sample. And there are hints for Mrk 1216 [@Yildirim1] and b19 [@2013MNRAS.434L..31L]. As the HETMGS survey is extremely suitable to find the densest galaxies in the nearby volume, because it is heavily biased towards the densest systems. These highly compact galaxies are very interesting, because they could be the passively evolved [ancestors]{} of the quiescent galaxies at $z\sim2$ (red nuggets), sub-mm galaxies and quasars found at high redshift $z>4$ [@2012Natur.491..729V; @2014ApJ...780L..20T; @2014ApJ...782...68T]. A detailed study of these curious objects is outside the scope of this paper.

The HETMGS only contains Northern galaxies and an extension of the survey to the South would double the viable targets. This is very worthwhile given the rarity of suitable targets for dynamical black hole mass measurements and the availability of high resolution Sourthern facilities. In the South, galaxies with $m_{ks} < 11.7$ already have low resolution, single aperture, spectroscopy from the 6dF Galaxy Survey [@2009MNRAS.399..683J; @2014MNRAS.443.1231C] and the follow up can thus be planned efficiently.

In conclusion, this paper describes the HET Massive Galaxy Survey, including the sample selection, data reduction and derived quantities of  galaxies. We also show that the current crop of black hole masses is strongly biased and that this survey is ideally suited to plan the next generation of direct black hole mass measurements.

Acknowledgments {#acknowledgments .unnumbered}
===============

It is a pleasure to thank the Telescope Operators Frank Deglman, Vicki Riley, Eusebio Terrazas, Amy Westfall and Resident Astronomers, John Caldwell, Stephen Odewahn, Sergey Rostopchin, Matthew Shetrone. We thank Arjen van der Wel, Ronald Läsker and Glenn van de Ven for discussions and suggestions that improved the survey.

The Hobby-Eberly Telescope (HET) is a joint project of the University of Texas at Austin, the Pennsylvania State University, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, and Georg-August-Universität Göttingen. The HET is named in honor of its principal benefactors, William P. Hobby and Robert E. Eberly. The Marcario Low Resolution Spectrograph is named for Mike Marcario of High Lonesome Optics who fabricated several optics for the instrument but died before its completion. The LRS is a joint project of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope partnership and the Instituto de Astronomía de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. J.L.W. has been supported by an NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Postdoctoral Fellowship under Award No. 1102845. This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. AST-1107675.

The work greatly depended on the public databases, [HyperLeda](http://leda.univ-lyon1.fr), NASA’s Astrophysics Data System and the NASA/IPAC Extragalactic Database (NED), which is operated by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. This research has made use of NASA’s Astrophysics Data System.

This publication makes use of data products from the Two Micron All Sky Survey, which is a joint project of the University of Massachusetts and the Infrared Processing and Analysis Center/California Institute of Technology, funded by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and the National Science Foundation.

Funding for the [Sloan Digital Sky Survey](http://www.sdss.org/) (SDSS) has been provided by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, the Participating Institutions, the National Aeronautics and Space Administration, the National Science Foundation, the U.S. Department of Energy, the Japanese Monbukagakusho, and the Max Planck Society. The SDSS is managed by the Astrophysical Research Consortium (ARC) for the Participating Institutions. The Participating Institutions are The University of Chicago, Fermilab, the Institute for Advanced Study, the Japan Participation Group, The Johns Hopkins University, Los Alamos National Laboratory, the Max-Planck-Institute for Astronomy (MPIA), the Max-Planck-Institute for Astrophysics (MPA), New Mexico State University, University of Pittsburgh, Princeton University, the United States Naval Observatory, and the University of Washington.

[llccrcccccc]{} 2MASS ID & Name & Frame & MJD & PA & slit & $V_{hel}$ & $\sigma_c$ & \[NII\]/H$\alpha$ & \[OIII\]/H$\beta$ & AoN\
& & & & () & ()& () & () & & &\
2MASS ID & Name & Frame & MJD & PA & slit & $V_{hel}$ & $\sigma_c$ & \[NII\]/H$\alpha$ & \[OIII\]/H$\beta$ & AoN\
& & & & & () & () & () & & &\

` ` & ` NGC5623 ` & 050570 & 55309.407 & 197 & 2.0 & 3417.0$\pm$13.7 & 260.8$\pm$6.7 & 0.24$\pm$0.04 & 1.29$\pm$0.43 & 23,1\
` ` & ` NGC5623 ` & 050571 & 55309.418 & 197 & 2.0 & 3406.8$\pm$14.0 & 262.2$\pm$7.0 & 0.18$\pm$0.04 & 0.59$\pm$0.13 & 26,3\
` ` & ` NGC5623 ` & 051125 & 55327.364 & 197 & 2.0 & 3463.9$\pm$12.5 & 250.5$\pm$6.4 & 0.19$\pm$0.04 & 0.53$\pm$0.10 & 31,4\
` ` & ` NGC5623 ` & 051126 & 55327.375 & 197 & 2.0 & 3471.1$\pm$14.5 & 249.3$\pm$6.8 & 0.15$\pm$0.03 & 0.59$\pm$0.12 & 31,3\
` ` & ` NGC5846A ` & 341486 & 56329.472 & 90 & 1.0 & 2196.8$\pm$11.3 & 195.3$\pm$3.5 & -0.17$\pm$0.56 & 0.12$\pm$0.50 & 2,1\
` 0223114+425931` & ` UGC01841 ` & 060058 & 55413.410 & 90 & 2.0 & 6245.8$\pm$19.9 & 241.9$\pm$11.4 & 0.49$\pm$0.03 & 0.74$\pm$0.17 & 26,2\
` 0223114+425931` & ` UGC01841 ` & 060059 & 55413.422 & 90 & 2.0 & 6244.0$\pm$17.5 & 248.5$\pm$9.7 & 0.52$\pm$0.03 & 0.92$\pm$0.29 & 28,2\
` 0223114+425931` & ` UGC01841 ` & 060162 & 55418.384 & 90 & 2.0 & 6271.6$\pm$13.0 & 258.0$\pm$8.0 & 0.48$\pm$0.04 & 1.21$\pm$0.50 & 21,1\
` 0223114+425931` & ` UGC01841 ` & 060193 & 55419.383 & 83 & 2.0 & 6272.1$\pm$14.8 & 242.3$\pm$8.1 & 0.48$\pm$0.04 & 0.83$\pm$0.23 & 17,2\
` 0249454+465834` & ` IC0257 ` & 062826 & 55508.150 & 76 & 2.0 & 7659.8$\pm$13.4 & 351.2$\pm$8.8 & - & 0.26$\pm$0.39 & 1,2\
` 0301141+445350` & ` NGC1161 ` & 140346 & 55539.321 & 370 & 2.0 & 1900.6$\pm$13.1 & 257.5$\pm$5.9 & 0.11$\pm$0.05 & 0.28$\pm$0.18 & 23,3\
` 0318158+415127` & ` NGC1265 ` & 062149 & 55495.437 & 350 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 0318158+415127` & ` NGC1265 ` & 140201 & 55536.329 & 365 & 2.0 & 7694.2$\pm$11.6 & 290.2$\pm$7.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 1353267+401809` & ` NGC5354 ` & 143840 & 55644.235 & 87 & 2.0 & 2525.8$\pm$13.0 & 230.5$\pm$6.5 & 0.20$\pm$0.05 & 0.73$\pm$0.14 & 20,3\
` 00000168+4716282` & ` UGC12889 ` & 161195 & 55887.235 & 350 & 1.0 & 4945.0$\pm$13.1 & 154.7$\pm$8.5 & 0.23$\pm$0.04 & 0.59$\pm$0.25 & 29,2\
` 00000914+3244182` & ` IC5370 ` & 351996 & 56456.442 & 120 & 1.0 & 10133.7$\pm$14.0 & 238.3$\pm$4.3 & 0.04$\pm$0.20 & -0.51$\pm$0.19 & 4,3\
` 00004696+2824071` & ` UGC12899 ` & 062173 & 55496.313 & 230 & 2.0 & 8616.0$\pm$18.0 & 263.1$\pm$12.6 & - & - & 1,0\
` 00021916+1258176` & ` NGC7810 ` & 261972 & 56237.247 & 260 & 1.0 & 5392.1$\pm$13.2 & 127.4$\pm$6.7 & -0.34$\pm$0.01 & -0.32$\pm$0.03 & 101,11\
` 00031494+1608428` & ` NGC7814 ` & 153358 & 55810.425 & 150 & 1.0 & 990.4$\pm$13.9 & 192.6$\pm$5.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 00043079+0512009` & ` NGC7820 ` & 152909 & 55799.428 & 165 & 2.0 & 3043.2$\pm$13.1 & 143.5$\pm$10.5 & - & - & 0,3\
` 00050624+0655122` & ` NGC7824 ` & 151812 & 55742.437 & 165 & 2.0 & 6018.4$\pm$13.5 & 229.7$\pm$6.2 & 0.38$\pm$0.03 & 0.71$\pm$0.12 & 33,3\
` 00095341+2555254` & ` NGC0023 ` & 141442 & 55571.100 & 330 & 2.0 & 4486.0$\pm$14.2 & 158.5$\pm$12.0 & -0.17$\pm$0.00 & -0.12$\pm$0.01 & 184,24\
` 00110106+3003072` & ` UGC00102 ` & 153789 & 55829.382 & 258 & 2.0 & 6662.4$\pm$11.5 & 196.8$\pm$7.3 & 0.32$\pm$0.02 & 0.59$\pm$0.08 & 56,8\
` 00112231+0623212` & ` NGC0036 ` & 160684 & 55865.253 & 170 & 1.0 & 5936.8$\pm$10.1 & 142.1$\pm$6.9 & 0.34$\pm$0.10 & - & 13,0\
` 00114314+2058320` & ` MRK0337 ` & 252919 & 56103.427 & 140 & 1.0 & 7820.2$\pm$13.8 & 137.8$\pm$5.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 00133440-0505352` & ` PGC000902 ` & 161006 & 55881.145 & 185 & 1.0 & 5344.1$\pm$14.0 & 84.1$\pm$18.6 & -0.46$\pm$0.02 & -0.47$\pm$0.14 & 50,4\
` 00144455-0720423` & ` NGC0050 ` & 060900 & 55450.316 & 180 & 2.0 & 5374.8$\pm$14.3 & 274.8$\pm$8.7 & 0.26$\pm$0.11 & - & 9,1\
` 00153087+1719422` & ` NGC0057 ` & 060896 & 55450.220 & 49 & 2.0 & 5360.4$\pm$15.1 & 298.6$\pm$8.8 & -0.05$\pm$0.36 & - & 3,0\
` 00153087+1719422` & ` NGC0057 ` & 060897 & 55450.233 & 49 & 2.0 & 5358.6$\pm$15.2 & 314.5$\pm$12.4 & - & - & 0,1\
` 00162493+3022252` & ` PGC001084 ` & 261626 & 56223.100 & 60 & 1.0 & 6275.9$\pm$13.1 & 256.1$\pm$8.4 & -1.19$\pm$0.64 & - & 2,1\
` 00182359+3003475` & ` NGC0071 ` & 161378 & 55893.227 & 285 & 1.0 & 6605.2$\pm$13.0 & 206.9$\pm$6.4 & 0.04$\pm$0.11 & 0.25$\pm$0.53 & 12,2\
` 00193596-0440105` & ` PGC1055035 ` & 262081 & 56239.170 & 205 & 1.0 & 6052.8$\pm$10.9 & 148.9$\pm$4.5 & -0.09$\pm$0.01 & 1.08$\pm$0.02 & 82,16\
` 00211086+2221261` & ` NGC0080 ` & 060969 & 55452.427 & 248 & 2.0 & 5646.3$\pm$14.2 & 235.0$\pm$7.5 & -0.34$\pm$0.32 & - & 2,0\
` 00212239+2226011` & ` NGC0083 ` & 262794 & 56262.196 & 295 & 1.0 & 6149.8$\pm$15.7 & 271.0$\pm$8.9 & -0.03$\pm$0.06 & 0.31$\pm$0.27 & 22,2\
` 00220321+2224291` & ` NGC0093 ` & 160115 & 55847.134 & 55 & 2.0 & 5497.2$\pm$16.6 & 182.4$\pm$10.3 & 0.13$\pm$0.07 & 0.45$\pm$0.26 & 18,2\
` 00270291+1135017` & ` UGC00260 ` & 161413 & 55894.216 & 200 & 1.0 & 2098.7$\pm$18.2 & 72.8$\pm$29.5 & -0.46$\pm$0.04 & 0.20$\pm$0.15 & 34,6\
` 00271620-0146487` & ` NGC0118 ` & 153306 & 55808.380 & 250 & 2.0 & 10935.8$\pm$15.0 & 125.7$\pm$20.8 & -0.37$\pm$0.01 & 0.04$\pm$0.03 & 75,20\
` 00305921+0509350` & ` NGC0138 ` & 141341 & 55569.090 & 165 & 2.0 & 11649.7$\pm$13.8 & 259.4$\pm$6.5 & 0.50$\pm$0.11 & 0.61$\pm$0.27 & 13,2\
` 00314572-0509095` & ` NGC0145 ` & 153672 & 55827.301 & 170 & 1.0 & 4087.4$\pm$17.4 & 74.1$\pm$30.5 & -0.46$\pm$0.01 & -0.21$\pm$0.03 & 138,20\
` 00344675-0823473` & ` NGC0157 ` & 262190 & 56243.163 & 205 & 1.0 & 1606.9$\pm$12.6 & 81.6$\pm$10.5 & -0.23$\pm$0.01 & 0.10$\pm$0.00 & 39,7\
` 00355984-1007183` & ` NGC0163 ` & 161347 & 55892.128 & 255 & 2.0 & 5850.4$\pm$14.7 & 267.2$\pm$8.4 & 0.14$\pm$0.14 & - & 7,0\
` 00370548+2541564` & ` UGC00367 ` & 161414 & 55894.239 & 185 & 2.0 & 9512.5$\pm$14.0 & 282.3$\pm$7.1 & -0.04$\pm$0.13 & - & 10,1\
` 00373345-0655202` & ` 2M00373 ` & 161150 & 55884.157 & 240 & 1.0 & 3277.7$\pm$11.5 & 208.0$\pm$4.7 & - & - & 1,0\
` 00375413-0624462` & ` PGC089884 ` & 262242 & 56246.160 & 235 & 1.0 & 7631.6$\pm$15.0 & 138.8$\pm$12.7 & -0.35$\pm$0.00 & -0.48$\pm$0.05 & 174,10\
` 00375769+0838068` & ` NGC0180 ` & 153607 & 55825.388 & 155 & 1.0 & 5203.3$\pm$13.9 & 118.9$\pm$10.3 & -0.46$\pm$0.01 & -0.52$\pm$0.08 & 101,6\
` 00393486+0253145` & ` NGC0200 ` & 161374 & 55893.074 & 135 & 1.0 & 5080.7$\pm$12.4 & 111.0$\pm$9.5 & -0.19$\pm$0.01 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & 127,18\
` 00395598+0650550` & ` IC1568 ` & 152418 & 55777.367 & 85 & 2.0 & 11694.3$\pm$14.6 & 285.4$\pm$8.7 & 0.24$\pm$0.11 & 0.40$\pm$0.35 & 13,1\
` 00402207+4141070` & ` NGC0205 ` & 161950 & 55932.138 & 250 & 1.0 & -291.2$\pm$15.1 & 24.8$\pm$25.4 & - & - & 1,0\
` 00423684-0131436` & ` NGC0227 ` & 153551 & 55822.370 & 160 & 2.0 & 5368.4$\pm$15.0 & 269.2$\pm$6.1 & -0.04$\pm$0.17 & - & 3,0\
` 00424182+4051546` & ` NGC0221 ` & 261443 & 56218.357 & 345 & 1.0 & -231.1$\pm$13.7 & 63.4$\pm$12.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 00424433+4116074` & ` NGC0224 ` & 161565 & 55909.211 & 274 & 1.0 & -358.1$\pm$14.6 & 185.3$\pm$3.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 00432844-0620554` & ` PGC002598 ` & 160931 & 55873.195 & 100 & 2.0 & 5784.5$\pm$18.7 & 140.2$\pm$29.8 & 0.05$\pm$0.20 & - & 7,1\
` 00433238+1420334` & ` NGC0234 ` & 261630 & 56223.314 & 235 & 1.0 & 4396.4$\pm$13.1 & 74.7$\pm$18.2 & -0.34$\pm$0.01 & -0.29$\pm$0.06 & 83,9\
` 00435075+3251121` & ` UGC00465 ` & 161379 & 55893.252 & 181 & 1.0 & 4696.3$\pm$12.2 & 144.1$\pm$5.6 & 0.43$\pm$0.13 & - & 9,0\
` 00471856+2749398` & ` IC1584 ` & 153901 & 55833.403 & 275 & 1.0 & 4663.2$\pm$14.7 & 87.6$\pm$9.2 & 0.18$\pm$0.13 & - & 10,0\
` 00494779+3216398` & ` NGC0266 ` & 153360 & 55810.484 & 275 & 2.0 & 4565.3$\pm$15.3 & 238.9$\pm$7.6 & 0.43$\pm$0.03 & 0.54$\pm$0.12 & 20,4\
` 00520430+4733019` & ` NGC0278 ` & 160601 & 55864.329 & 210 & 1.0 & 590.9$\pm$13.7 & 55.3$\pm$13.5 & -0.27$\pm$0.01 & -0.26$\pm$0.06 & 82,6\
` 00563259-0146189` & ` NGC0307 ` & 152308 & 55772.439 & 80 & 2.0 & 3905.1$\pm$12.6 & 239.4$\pm$7.5 & - & -2.14$\pm$0.12 & 0,2\
` 00564266-0954500` & ` NGC0309 ` & 153673 & 55827.325 & 100 & 1.0 & 5579.7$\pm$11.2 & 117.5$\pm$8.0 & -0.13$\pm$0.03 & 0.26$\pm$0.16 & 46,4\
` 00573274+3016508` & ` NGC0311 ` & 061546 & 55478.390 & 295 & 2.0 & 4943.4$\pm$13.5 & 250.6$\pm$6.9 & 0.29$\pm$0.12 & - & 8,1\
` 00574891+3021083` & ` NGC0315 ` & 060751 & 55445.240 & 45 & 2.0 & 4885.0$\pm$13.5 & 339.0$\pm$7.5 & 0.37$\pm$0.04 & 0.83$\pm$0.25 & 31,2\
` 00574891+3021083` & ` NGC0315 ` & 060752 & 55445.254 & 45 & 2.0 & 4887.0$\pm$13.9 & 328.3$\pm$6.2 & 0.37$\pm$0.03 & 0.58$\pm$0.13 & 36,3\
` 00574891+3021083` & ` NGC0315 ` & 062731 & 55506.313 & 258 & 2.0 & 4880.4$\pm$14.0 & 335.5$\pm$5.8 & 0.41$\pm$0.02 & 0.69$\pm$0.12 & 38,3\
` 01002812+4759428` & ` UGC00622 ` & 153937 & 55835.411 & 330 & 1.0 & 2648.3$\pm$14.5 & 34.9$\pm$25.5 & -0.32$\pm$0.01 & -0.38$\pm$0.13 & 123,4\
` 01015784-0156124` & ` NGC0351 ` & 160679 & 55865.178 & 125 & 1.0 & 4159.4$\pm$12.8 & 121.9$\pm$6.8 & -0.16$\pm$0.01 & 0.09$\pm$0.05 & 82,12\
` 01071757+3228581` & ` NGC0380 ` & 061286 & 55471.407 & 225 & 2.0 & 4420.3$\pm$14.0 & 281.0$\pm$7.2 & 0.20$\pm$0.06 & 0.64$\pm$0.28 & 11,1\
` 01071757+3228581` & ` NGC0380 ` & 061287 & 55471.419 & 225 & 2.0 & 4421.7$\pm$13.8 & 284.7$\pm$5.8 & 0.32$\pm$0.05 & 0.63$\pm$0.19 & 11,2\
` 01072180+1416240` & ` PGC003963 ` & 141582 & 55575.108 & 315 & 2.0 & 21678.0$\pm$16.2 & 369.0$\pm$11.8 & - & - & 0,1\
` 01072493+3224452` & ` NGC0383 ` & 060971 & 55452.456 & 261 & 2.0 & 4994.1$\pm$14.9 & 326.1$\pm$9.0 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & 0.52$\pm$0.12 & 33,3\
` 01072493+3224452` & ` NGC0383 ` & 062005 & 55488.142 & 98 & 2.0 & 4958.7$\pm$14.7 & 291.5$\pm$8.8 & 0.33$\pm$0.02 & 0.59$\pm$0.12 & 37,4\
` 01072493+3224452` & ` NGC0383 ` & 062361 & 55500.330 & 261 & 2.0 & 4977.1$\pm$14.9 & 300.5$\pm$6.7 & 0.30$\pm$0.03 & 0.57$\pm$0.15 & 33,3\
` 01072503+3217341` & ` NGC0384 ` & 140342 & 55539.229 & 315 & 2.0 & 4180.1$\pm$13.2 & 262.1$\pm$5.9 & 0.39$\pm$0.11 & - & 8,0\
` 01072503+3217341` & ` NGC0384 ` & 261482 & 56219.369 & 315 & 1.0 & 4188.2$\pm$13.4 & 266.4$\pm$3.9 & 0.23$\pm$0.07 & - & 13,0\
` 01072503+3217341` & ` NGC0384 ` & 340749 & 56293.167 & 315 & 1.0 & 4183.0$\pm$13.9 & 250.1$\pm$6.5 & 0.08$\pm$0.17 & - & 8,0\
` 01082344+3308008` & ` NGC0392 ` & 153902 & 55833.422 & 235 & 2.0 & 4581.5$\pm$12.5 & 235.6$\pm$6.6 & - & -0.42$\pm$0.23 & 0,2\
` 01105887+3309072` & ` NGC0410 ` & 060972 & 55452.471 & 262 & 2.0 & 5204.2$\pm$15.2 & 310.6$\pm$5.8 & 0.13$\pm$0.04 & -0.07$\pm$0.12 & 16,3\
` 01124858-0017246` & ` NGC0426 ` & 062216 & 55497.272 & 140 & 2.0 & 5187.4$\pm$15.1 & 297.4$\pm$7.6 & 0.31$\pm$0.01 & 0.40$\pm$0.04 & 72,11\
` 01125570+0058536` & ` NGC0428 ` & 340872 & 56305.079 & 275 & 1.0 & 1130.5$\pm$14.1 & 55.8$\pm$26.4 & -0.42$\pm$0.36 & - & 3,0\
` 01125992-0015087` & ` NGC0430 ` & 061901 & 55485.225 & 153 & 2.0 & 5220.6$\pm$13.6 & 242.4$\pm$6.4 & 0.28$\pm$0.06 & - & 10,0\
` 01155335+0519325` & ` PGC004568 ` & 262083 & 56239.270 & 190 & 1.0 & 4969.6$\pm$13.3 & 207.9$\pm$6.3 & - & - & 0,2\
` 01160360+0417385` & ` NGC0446 ` & 153670 & 55827.263 & 115 & 2.0 & 5363.4$\pm$13.7 & 173.0$\pm$7.4 & 0.06$\pm$0.01 & 0.36$\pm$0.06 & 65,4\
` 01160722+3305218` & ` NGC0449 ` & 161951 & 55932.155 & 262 & 1.0 & 4689.1$\pm$31.2 & 250.1$\pm$86.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 01191813+0434411` & ` MRK0567 ` & 253521 & 56140.411 & 70 & 1.0 & 9527.9$\pm$16.6 & 142.2$\pm$13.2 & -0.35$\pm$0.00 & -0.53$\pm$0.00 & 137,8\
` 01193304+1452147` & ` NGC0469 ` & 062354 & 55500.152 & 170 & 2.0 & 3984.0$\pm$23.4 & 31.0$\pm$44.7 & -0.77$\pm$0.01 & 0.35$\pm$0.01 & 94,85\
` 01193304+1452147` & ` NGC0469 ` & 062355 & 55500.164 & 170 & 2.0 & 4028.0$\pm$41.6 & 20.6$\pm$53.7 & -0.76$\pm$0.02 & 0.34$\pm$0.03 & 45,39\
` 01195507+1632407` & ` NGC0473 ` & 161415 & 55894.258 & 160 & 1.0 & 2083.7$\pm$12.7 & 62.3$\pm$10.3 & -0.17$\pm$0.02 & 0.35$\pm$0.08 & 55,7\
` 01195962+1447107` & ` NGC0471 ` & 262026 & 56238.314 & 245 & 1.0 & 4121.7$\pm$12.5 & 127.5$\pm$5.4 & -0.20$\pm$0.00 & -0.25$\pm$0.01 & 271,23\
` 01195962+1447107` & ` NGC0471 ` & 262084 & 56239.294 & 245 & 1.0 & 4117.0$\pm$13.3 & 127.4$\pm$6.0 & -0.20$\pm$0.00 & -0.30$\pm$0.02 & 281,25\
` 01202867+3242322` & ` NGC0472 ` & 161013 & 55881.301 & 305 & 2.0 & 5178.0$\pm$12.5 & 247.1$\pm$6.6 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01202867+3242322` & ` NGC0472 ` & 261319 & 56214.394 & 305 & 1.0 & 5213.1$\pm$13.2 & 245.6$\pm$5.0 & - & - & 1,0\
` 01202867+3242322` & ` NGC0472 ` & 340608 & 56285.199 & 305 & 1.0 & 5200.9$\pm$16.3 & 253.1$\pm$5.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01202867+3242322` & ` NGC0472 ` & 341331 & 56323.089 & 305 & 1.0 & 5202.5$\pm$13.2 & 256.7$\pm$5.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01212039+4029176` & ` NGC0477 ` & 161325 & 55890.280 & 300 & 1.0 & 5768.0$\pm$17.3 & 108.4$\pm$18.2 & -0.44$\pm$0.03 & -0.25$\pm$0.16 & 39,4\
` 01214684+0515241` & ` NGC0488 ` & 153638 & 55826.267 & 185 & 2.0 & 2205.5$\pm$15.2 & 201.0$\pm$7.0 & 0.26$\pm$0.04 & 0.50$\pm$0.16 & 15,2\
` 01225395-0438353` & ` IC0100 ` & 153427 & 55811.383 & 260 & 2.0 & 5153.0$\pm$13.2 & 186.2$\pm$9.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01225533+3310261` & ` NGC0494 ` & 153938 & 55835.426 & 280 & 2.0 & 5349.9$\pm$13.8 & 121.7$\pm$14.1 & 0.22$\pm$0.02 & 1.02$\pm$0.05 & 60,9\
` 01231145+3327362` & ` NGC0499 ` & 140927 & 55555.203 & 250 & 2.0 & 4292.5$\pm$14.9 & 276.9$\pm$7.4 & 0.35$\pm$0.12 & - & 7,1\
` 01232787+3312152` & ` NGC0504 ` & 141953 & 55590.111 & 225 & 2.0 & 4147.6$\pm$13.1 & 181.7$\pm$9.0 & - & -0.32$\pm$0.45 & 0,2\
` 01233995+3315222` & ` NGC0507 ` & 060934 & 55451.255 & 97 & 2.0 & 4859.7$\pm$13.8 & 282.7$\pm$6.2 & -0.22$\pm$0.30 & - & 2,0\
` 01243377+0143532` & ` NGC0521 ` & 260482 & 56177.439 & 145 & 1.0 & 4947.7$\pm$11.9 & 222.8$\pm$4.8 & 0.38$\pm$0.05 & 0.70$\pm$0.27 & 16,2\
` 01244505+3209565` & ` UGC00959 ` & 153875 & 55832.435 & 260 & 2.0 & 10315.4$\pm$15.1 & 195.6$\pm$11.2 & -0.14$\pm$0.02 & -0.03$\pm$0.07 & 66,9\
` 01244770+0932196` & ` NGC0524 ` & 261973 & 56237.310 & 235 & 1.0 & 2339.3$\pm$12.5 & 244.6$\pm$5.2 & -0.26$\pm$0.09 & -0.94$\pm$0.20 & 15,3\
` 01250764+0841576` & ` IC1695 ` & 153933 & 55835.241 & 115 & 2.0 & 14221.4$\pm$15.2 & 439.0$\pm$7.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01250764+0841576` & ` IC1695 ` & 162757 & 55959.068 & 295 & 2.0 & 14342.3$\pm$17.2 & 387.3$\pm$12.9 & - & - & 0,1\
` 01253143+0145335` & ` NGC0533 ` & 152352 & 55775.420 & 55 & 2.0 & 5469.3$\pm$15.2 & 288.7$\pm$6.4 & 0.25$\pm$0.04 & 0.88$\pm$0.35 & 18,1\
` 01253359+3340165` & ` NGC0528 ` & 161104 & 55883.290 & 240 & 2.0 & 4710.4$\pm$14.0 & 267.5$\pm$6.1 & 0.42$\pm$0.04 & 0.61$\pm$0.18 & 21,3\
` 01254030+3442465` & ` NGC0529 ` & 153508 & 55821.470 & 340 & 2.0 & 4721.3$\pm$15.4 & 239.5$\pm$11.0 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01254430-0122461` & ` NGC0541 ` & 262023 & 56238.249 & 240 & 1.0 & 5338.9$\pm$13.6 & 237.6$\pm$5.1 & 0.01$\pm$0.05 & 0.39$\pm$0.26 & 25,2\
` 01260057-0120424` & ` NGC0547 ` & 060968 & 55452.318 & 130 & 2.0 & 5470.0$\pm$15.5 & 250.2$\pm$7.4 & 0.39$\pm$0.07 & - & 9,0\
` 01264255+0201205` & ` NGC0550 ` & 141198 & 55565.110 & 300 & 2.0 & 5788.6$\pm$12.5 & 217.6$\pm$8.1 & 0.20$\pm$0.05 & - & 21,1\
` 01265610-0722240` & ` PGC1020086 ` & 140117 & 55534.151 & 180 & 2.0 & 10000.7$\pm$14.2 & 215.7$\pm$9.1 & -0.05$\pm$0.33 & -0.10$\pm$0.41 & 6,6\
` 01274302-0108225` & ` UGC01043 ` & 153304 & 55808.343 & 200 & 1.0 & 5152.0$\pm$11.4 & 95.3$\pm$8.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01312075-0652050` & ` NGC0584 ` & 060867 & 55449.376 & 242 & 2.0 & 1802.1$\pm$13.4 & 220.1$\pm$6.6 & 0.25$\pm$0.09 & - & 6,0\
` 01312075-0652050` & ` NGC0584 ` & 060939 & 55451.362 & 232 & 2.0 & 1782.7$\pm$13.1 & 219.0$\pm$6.8 & 0.38$\pm$0.06 & - & 6,1\
` 01312075-0652050` & ` NGC0584 ` & 060940 & 55451.376 & 232 & 2.0 & 1789.6$\pm$13.4 & 212.9$\pm$6.7 & 0.38$\pm$0.07 & - & 6,1\
` 01314889+1835498` & ` ARK052 ` & 152268 & 55770.402 & 55 & 2.0 & 12560.0$\pm$15.4 & 248.4$\pm$7.9 & - & - & 2,0\
` 01325190-0701535` & ` NGC0596 ` & 262793 & 56262.149 & 230 & 1.0 & 1820.3$\pm$13.6 & 154.9$\pm$4.1 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01333122+3540055` & ` NGC0591 ` & 162708 & 55958.114 & 315 & 1.0 & 4427.0$\pm$15.4 & 123.0$\pm$7.7 & 0.05$\pm$0.00 & 1.04$\pm$0.01 & 301,36\
` 01390652-0730453` & ` NGC0636 ` & 152862 & 55798.428 & 240 & 1.0 & 1810.1$\pm$13.9 & 173.3$\pm$3.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01390902+4816574` & ` PGC006116 ` & 152858 & 55798.326 & 50 & 2.0 & 5351.2$\pm$13.6 & 331.6$\pm$6.7 & 0.28$\pm$0.03 & 0.44$\pm$0.08 & 32,4\
` 01390902+4816574` & ` PGC006116 ` & 161326 & 55890.301 & 230 & 1.0 & 5377.7$\pm$13.4 & 337.5$\pm$7.4 & 0.26$\pm$0.05 & 0.36$\pm$0.12 & 28,4\
` 01430234+1338444` & ` NGC0660 ` & 261974 & 56237.327 & 221 & 1.0 & 819.3$\pm$14.8 & 104.1$\pm$12.1 & -0.06$\pm$0.01 & 0.36$\pm$0.04 & 355,12\
` 01441463+2842215` & ` NGC0661 ` & 262796 & 56262.286 & 240 & 1.0 & 3753.7$\pm$14.7 & 188.3$\pm$4.8 & 0.31$\pm$0.16 & -0.23$\pm$0.21 & 4,3\
` 01445609+1025230` & ` NGC0665 ` & 060899 & 55450.300 & 129 & 2.0 & 5343.2$\pm$14.7 & 212.8$\pm$8.3 & 0.41$\pm$0.03 & 0.64$\pm$0.14 & 19,3\
` 01471616+3533478` & ` NGC0669 ` & 142433 & 55606.072 & 215 & 2.0 & 4569.1$\pm$16.6 & 202.1$\pm$11.9 & 0.33$\pm$0.05 & 0.71$\pm$0.27 & 20,3\
` 01472040+0249588` & ` PGC006568 ` & 260566 & 56186.431 & 255 & 1.0 & 7070.1$\pm$12.7 & 259.6$\pm$5.1 & 0.14$\pm$0.08 & 0.63$\pm$0.20 & 15,3\
` 01492485+2159502` & ` NGC0678 ` & 153605 & 55825.267 & 90 & 2.0 & 2787.5$\pm$13.1 & 170.2$\pm$8.3 & 0.34$\pm$0.01 & 0.74$\pm$0.04 & 61,6\
` 01494379+3547083` & ` NGC0679 ` & 161289 & 55889.299 & 290 & 2.0 & 4966.3$\pm$13.6 & 255.7$\pm$6.4 & 0.02$\pm$0.05 & 0.61$\pm$0.47 & 18,1\
` 01494728+2158149` & ` NGC0680 ` & 262795 & 56262.268 & 160 & 1.0 & 2876.2$\pm$12.5 & 214.5$\pm$3.9 & 0.32$\pm$0.09 & 0.64$\pm$0.14 & 10,2\
` 01501400+2738444` & ` NGC0684 ` & 161014 & 55881.318 & 265 & 2.0 & 3474.6$\pm$14.2 & 179.2$\pm$9.0 & 0.37$\pm$0.03 & 1.22$\pm$0.28 & 20,1\
` 01504172+2145356` & ` NGC0691 ` & 262027 & 56238.338 & 280 & 1.0 & 2610.5$\pm$10.2 & 104.2$\pm$6.0 & 0.26$\pm$0.11 & - & 11,1\
` 01504172+2145356` & ` NGC0691 ` & 262086 & 56239.338 & 280 & 1.0 & 2610.0$\pm$7.7 & 131.2$\pm$6.7 & 0.26$\pm$0.25 & - & 6,0\
` 01504172+2145356` & ` NGC0691 ` & 262113 & 56240.327 & 280 & 1.0 & 2604.8$\pm$13.0 & 98.4$\pm$8.6 & 0.37$\pm$0.22 & - & 8,0\
` 01511756+2221286` & ` NGC0697 ` & 153678 & 55827.471 & 283 & 2.0 & 3066.8$\pm$14.4 & 85.1$\pm$22.0 & -0.15$\pm$0.04 & 0.15$\pm$0.23 & 33,2\
` 01512719-0215317` & ` PGC006858 ` & 061904 & 55485.332 & 199 & 2.0 & 13551.9$\pm$15.0 & 242.7$\pm$8.7 & - & -0.50$\pm$0.20 & 0,4\
` 01523770+3607362` & ` NGC0704 ` & 253322 & 56124.418 & 85 & 1.0 & 4658.5$\pm$12.5 & 166.8$\pm$5.7 & 0.01$\pm$0.49 & - & 1,1\
` 01524648+3609065` & ` NGC0708 ` & 162188 & 55942.170 & 220 & 2.0 & 4762.4$\pm$14.7 & 242.7$\pm$9.8 & 0.35$\pm$0.02 & 0.46$\pm$0.12 & 57,4\
` 01530843+3649115` & ` NGC0712 ` & 161100 & 55883.108 & 80 & 2.0 & 5291.3$\pm$15.1 & 227.9$\pm$9.0 & -0.12$\pm$0.09 & 0.16$\pm$0.25 & 16,3\
` 01532965+3613167` & ` NGC0714 ` & 142529 & 55609.087 & 290 & 2.0 & 4324.2$\pm$15.5 & 223.8$\pm$15.0 & 0.25$\pm$0.17 & - & 7,1\
` 01552201+0636421` & ` UGC01395 ` & 261521 & 56220.356 & 140 & 1.0 & 5079.1$\pm$12.9 & 69.7$\pm$12.8 & -0.02$\pm$0.01 & 1.06$\pm$0.02 & 94,12\
` 01562095+0537437` & ` NGC0741 ` & 060847 & 55448.317 & 90 & 2.0 & 5484.5$\pm$13.1 & 292.2$\pm$7.0 & -0.19$\pm$0.14 & - & 7,1\
` 01562095+0537437` & ` NGC0741 ` & 060848 & 55448.328 & 90 & 2.0 & 5487.3$\pm$15.2 & 284.0$\pm$7.1 & -0.09$\pm$0.13 & - & 6,0\
` 01564087+3302366` & ` NGC0736 ` & 160677 & 55865.139 & 135 & 2.0 & 4265.1$\pm$14.0 & 263.3$\pm$5.8 & -1.28$\pm$0.17 & -1.96$\pm$0.17 & 5,2\
` 01564822+3559412` & ` PGC007302 ` & 141443 & 55571.175 & 285 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 01564822+3559412` & ` PGC007302 ` & 142409 & 55605.071 & 270 & 2.0 & 13965.9$\pm$23.1 & 46.9$\pm$51.5 & - & - & 0,1\
` 01575032+3620351` & ` NGC0759 ` & 140307 & 55538.265 & 225 & 2.0 & 4583.7$\pm$14.9 & 259.2$\pm$7.2 & -0.11$\pm$0.01 & -0.05$\pm$0.05 & 84,10\
` 01575100+4455069` & ` NGC0746 ` & 253480 & 56138.411 & 20 & 1.0 & 651.0$\pm$23.8 & 50.8$\pm$37.4 & -0.76$\pm$0.04 & 0.49$\pm$0.07 & 14,14\
` 01583589-0127259` & ` ARK069 ` & 261367 & 56215.255 & 230 & 1.0 & 4938.7$\pm$13.3 & 214.3$\pm$6.3 & - & - & 2,0\
` 01584199+0820482` & ` NGC0766 ` & 062176 & 55496.365 & 155 & 2.0 & 7801.5$\pm$16.9 & 270.7$\pm$12.5 & -0.15$\pm$0.09 & - & 8,1\
` 01591364+1857169` & ` NGC0770 ` & 262137 & 56241.334 & 190 & 1.0 & 2505.8$\pm$13.6 & 96.9$\pm$7.1 & - & - & 0,0\
` 01591958+1900271` & ` NGC0772 ` & 262736 & 56261.268 & 315 & 1.0 & 2430.2$\pm$11.2 & 123.9$\pm$5.6 & -0.07$\pm$0.02 & 0.18$\pm$0.11 & 59,6\
` 02001493+3125457` & ` NGC0777 ` & 060002 & 55411.382 & 145 & 2.0 & 4905.1$\pm$14.9 & 321.5$\pm$9.1 & 0.46$\pm$0.13 & - & 4,0\
` 02001493+3125457` & ` NGC0777 ` & 060003 & 55411.394 & 145 & 2.0 & 4914.0$\pm$14.7 & 327.4$\pm$8.9 & 0.49$\pm$0.21 & - & 3,1\
` 02001493+3125457` & ` NGC0777 ` & 060473 & 55427.346 & 145 & 2.0 & 4916.7$\pm$14.4 & 340.6$\pm$5.4 & -0.20$\pm$0.10 & -0.89$\pm$0.17 & 7,1\
` 02001493+3125457` & ` NGC0777 ` & 060474 & 55427.358 & 145 & 2.0 & 4925.7$\pm$13.0 & 330.6$\pm$6.3 & 0.71$\pm$0.41 & - & 1,0\
` 02005846+5423427` & ` PGC2468432 ` & 261483 & 56219.388 & 240 & 1.0 & 4746.1$\pm$13.8 & 267.8$\pm$4.3 & 0.02$\pm$0.02 & 0.75$\pm$0.10 & 56,4\
` 02010947+5030254` & ` UGC01493A ` & 261524 & 56220.410 & 320 & 1.0 & 4790.3$\pm$13.2 & 111.7$\pm$9.3 & -0.09$\pm$0.01 & 0.46$\pm$0.05 & 73,10\
` 02060402+2947350` & ` UGC01590 ` & 140928 & 55555.220 & 310 & 2.0 & 4909.2$\pm$14.0 & 226.3$\pm$7.9 & -0.91$\pm$0.73 & -1.78$\pm$0.18 & 3,4\
` 02060402+2947350` & ` UGC01590 ` & 141015 & 55558.214 & 310 & 2.0 & 4867.9$\pm$13.8 & 230.0$\pm$6.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 02082114+1059415` & ` NGC0821 ` & 153639 & 55826.285 & 210 & 2.0 & 1629.8$\pm$13.4 & 214.9$\pm$6.8 & -0.50$\pm$0.19 & -0.61$\pm$0.21 & 2,1\
` 02092458-1008091` & ` NGC0835 ` & 153485 & 55818.392 & 175 & 2.0 & 3949.5$\pm$14.3 & 125.0$\pm$15.0 & 0.00$\pm$0.01 & 0.36$\pm$0.07 & 67,4\
` 02093856+3547499` & ` UGC01651 ` & 153573 & 55823.270 & 105 & 2.0 & 10964.0$\pm$14.5 & 268.6$\pm$8.4 & 0.53$\pm$0.07 & 1.13$\pm$0.62 & 12,1\
` 02100957+3911253` & ` NGC0828 ` & 140308 & 55538.282 & 315 & 2.0 & 5216.9$\pm$14.1 & 146.6$\pm$14.9 & -0.29$\pm$0.01 & -0.19$\pm$0.08 & 108,6\
` 02111449+1407144` & ` ARK078 ` & 142328 & 55604.075 & 275 & 2.0 & 7546.2$\pm$15.9 & 180.6$\pm$8.1 & -0.97$\pm$0.30 & -0.95$\pm$0.35 & 5,3\
` 02113142+7046204` & ` PGC137982 ` & 141012 & 55558.103 & 370 & 2.0 & 3187.8$\pm$16.5 & 296.6$\pm$12.8 & 0.15$\pm$0.05 & 0.04$\pm$0.36 & 20,2\
` 02132233-0220322` & ` PGC170027 ` & 153099 & 55804.405 & 145 & 2.0 & 10902.3$\pm$13.4 & 255.6$\pm$6.5 & 0.23$\pm$0.06 & 0.42$\pm$0.13 & 12,3\
` 02140361+2752378` & ` NGC0855 ` & 262138 & 56241.350 & 247 & 1.0 & 552.0$\pm$15.9 & 51.5$\pm$23.5 & -0.76$\pm$0.01 & 0.46$\pm$0.01 & 63,43\
` 02140361+2752378` & ` NGC0855 ` & 262191 & 56243.344 & 247 & 1.0 & 563.2$\pm$15.6 & 42.7$\pm$20.7 & -0.78$\pm$0.01 & 0.45$\pm$0.01 & 68,54\
` 02143357-0046002` & ` NGC0863 ` & 262022 & 56238.202 & 215 & 1.0 & 7757.8$\pm$12.9 & 174.9$\pm$4.4 & 0.25$\pm$0.01 & 1.17$\pm$0.03 & 65,11\
` 02161335+7041194` & ` PGC138040 ` & 141581 & 55575.065 & 395 & 2.0 & 3409.1$\pm$17.7 & 292.0$\pm$15.0 & -0.60$\pm$0.40 & - & 3,1\
` 02190516-0647271` & ` NGC0883 ` & 061747 & 55482.324 & 182 & 2.0 & 5337.9$\pm$14.3 & 277.9$\pm$6.6 & 0.24$\pm$0.19 & - & 4,1\
` 02220100+3315579` & ` NGC0890 ` & 060846 & 55448.301 & 97 & 2.0 & 3946.4$\pm$14.4 & 211.7$\pm$8.0 & -0.27$\pm$0.36 & -0.16$\pm$0.69 & 1,1\
` 02232039+4157052` & ` NGC0898 ` & 141711 & 55580.167 & 353 & 2.0 & 5392.8$\pm$13.2 & 206.0$\pm$10.0 & 0.22$\pm$0.05 & 0.49$\pm$0.23 & 18,2\
` 02232199+3211492` & ` MRK1034 ` & 261976 & 56237.381 & 255 & 1.0 & 9954.1$\pm$14.4 & 181.3$\pm$9.5 & -0.07$\pm$0.01 & 0.45$\pm$0.02 & 227,24\
` 02240801+4758108` & ` UGC01845 ` & 152307 & 55772.421 & 140 & 2.0 & 4539.5$\pm$16.0 & 136.7$\pm$21.0 & -0.19$\pm$0.01 & -0.15$\pm$0.07 & 210,5\
` 02244441+4237225` & ` UGC01859 ` & 060004 & 55411.411 & 36 & 2.0 & 5849.1$\pm$15.9 & 353.4$\pm$7.2 & 0.15$\pm$0.03 & 0.60$\pm$0.09 & 29,4\
` 02244441+4237225` & ` UGC01859 ` & 060005 & 55411.422 & 36 & 2.0 & 5861.8$\pm$15.9 & 347.1$\pm$8.2 & 0.18$\pm$0.03 & 0.49$\pm$0.10 & 26,5\
` 02244441+4237225` & ` UGC01859 ` & 060230 & 55420.382 & 36 & 2.0 & 5843.4$\pm$14.2 & 352.5$\pm$7.0 & 0.07$\pm$0.03 & 0.59$\pm$0.10 & 21,4\
` 02244441+4237225` & ` UGC01859 ` & 060231 & 55420.395 & 36 & 2.0 & 5858.3$\pm$13.9 & 357.3$\pm$8.7 & 0.06$\pm$0.03 & 0.34$\pm$0.09 & 23,6\
` 02244441+4237225` & ` UGC01859 ` & 062006 & 55488.192 & 84 & 2.0 & 5891.2$\pm$16.7 & 320.2$\pm$8.2 & 0.19$\pm$0.04 & 0.42$\pm$0.11 & 25,6\
` 02244441+4237225` & ` UGC01859 ` & 062321 & 55499.372 & 274 & 2.0 & 5868.5$\pm$14.4 & 381.9$\pm$8.2 & 0.20$\pm$0.02 & 0.50$\pm$0.07 & 42,7\
` 02244441+4237225` & ` UGC01859 ` & 160678 & 55865.161 & 45 & 1.0 & 5858.2$\pm$14.1 & 350.9$\pm$8.0 & 0.16$\pm$0.04 & 0.61$\pm$0.13 & 31,4\
` 02250460+2213021` & ` UGC01871 ` & 253446 & 56133.438 & 50 & 1.0 & 9936.4$\pm$14.3 & 222.9$\pm$10.4 & -0.24$\pm$0.03 & -0.12$\pm$0.11 & 46,5\
` 02252677+4149275` & ` NGC0910 ` & 162710 & 55958.151 & 215 & 2.0 & 5115.2$\pm$14.4 & 254.5$\pm$7.8 & 0.18$\pm$0.33 & - & 3,0\
` 02264683+2029507` & ` NGC0924 ` & 153574 & 55823.288 & 55 & 2.0 & 4430.7$\pm$14.6 & 201.6$\pm$8.5 & 0.38$\pm$0.05 & 1.00$\pm$0.21 & 12,2\
` 02273746-0109226` & ` NGC0936 ` & 260565 & 56186.365 & 105 & 1.0 & 1379.0$\pm$13.1 & 194.4$\pm$3.6 & 0.15$\pm$0.05 & 0.53$\pm$0.13 & 16,3\
` 02280361+2810312` & ` IC0227 ` & 153671 & 55827.282 & 70 & 2.0 & 10131.3$\pm$17.1 & 245.2$\pm$9.6 & 0.34$\pm$0.18 & 0.22$\pm$0.46 & 6,2\
` 02291399+2304579` & ` IC1802 ` & 141444 & 55571.192 & 300 & 2.0 & 9397.0$\pm$14.8 & 371.5$\pm$8.5 & -0.59$\pm$0.35 & - & 2,0\
` 02303311-0106305` & ` NGC0955 ` & 153214 & 55806.403 & 200 & 1.0 & 1430.8$\pm$13.1 & 92.4$\pm$10.4 & 0.18$\pm$0.21 & - & 8,0\
` 02304283-0256204` & ` NGC0958 ` & 153428 & 55811.400 & 195 & 2.0 & 5559.7$\pm$13.8 & 169.8$\pm$10.1 & -0.05$\pm$0.05 & 0.79$\pm$0.50 & 28,1\
` 02304865+3708124` & ` NGC0949 ` & 162189 & 55942.194 & 325 & 1.0 & 577.5$\pm$13.7 & 18.4$\pm$25.9 & -0.41$\pm$0.01 & -0.04$\pm$0.04 & 72,18\
` 02322394+3529408` & ` NGC0959 ` & 262088 & 56239.383 & 215 & 1.0 & 557.4$\pm$19.3 & 40.0$\pm$31.7 & -0.43$\pm$0.02 & 0.34$\pm$0.09 & 49,9\
` 02341338+2918404` & ` NGC0972 ` & 153259 & 55807.335 & 150 & 2.0 & 1504.2$\pm$14.6 & 69.2$\pm$24.7 & -0.35$\pm$0.00 & 0.08$\pm$0.01 & 218,27\
` 02342010+3230200` & ` NGC0973 ` & 141733 & 55581.167 & 225 & 2.0 & 4702.3$\pm$30.2 & 151.9$\pm$45.4 & 0.11$\pm$0.07 & 0.92$\pm$0.36 & 18,2\
` 02343788-0847170` & ` NGC0985 ` & 152791 & 55796.470 & 257 & 2.0 & 12608.8$\pm$42.3 & 290.7$\pm$33.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 02352485+4052109` & ` NGC0982 ` & 141734 & 55581.191 & 310 & 2.0 & 5645.1$\pm$17.7 & 200.3$\pm$13.1 & 0.27$\pm$0.02 & 0.91$\pm$0.21 & 35,2\
` 02352485+4052109` & ` UGC02066 ` & 141445 & 55571.210 & 310 & 2.0 & 5668.9$\pm$10.7 & 214.8$\pm$7.5 & 0.26$\pm$0.03 & 0.76$\pm$0.12 & 40,3\
` 02363546+5939165` & ` UGCA034 ` & 153261 & 55807.370 & 47 & 2.0 & 11.7$\pm$16.3 & 250.6$\pm$11.8 & -0.08$\pm$0.12 & - & 11,0\
` 02364960+3319381` & ` NGC0987 ` & 141849 & 55585.169 & 220 & 2.0 & 4520.8$\pm$14.3 & 260.9$\pm$8.1 & -0.19$\pm$0.02 & 0.21$\pm$0.14 & 34,4\
` 02364960+3319381` & ` NGC0987 ` & 141850 & 55585.183 & 220 & 2.0 & 4567.1$\pm$13.1 & 251.8$\pm$8.6 & -0.16$\pm$0.03 & 0.30$\pm$0.22 & 31,2\
` 02372549+2106030` & ` NGC0992 ` & 153074 & 55803.351 & 185 & 2.0 & 4148.1$\pm$13.5 & 104.1$\pm$23.9 & -0.35$\pm$0.01 & -0.43$\pm$0.04 & 174,10\
` 02374759+3225114` & ` PGC3088862 ` & 262180 & 56242.379 & 200 & 1.0 & 10691.6$\pm$13.0 & 212.7$\pm$7.9 & 0.72$\pm$0.24 & - & 6,0\
` 02381955+0207091` & ` NGC1016 ` & 061220 & 55470.307 & 235 & 2.0 & 6484.5$\pm$13.7 & 293.2$\pm$6.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 02381955+0207091` & ` NGC1016 ` & 061221 & 55470.321 & 235 & 2.0 & 6482.2$\pm$14.4 & 314.4$\pm$7.3 & - & -0.45$\pm$0.41 & 0,2\
` 02383270-0640386` & ` NGC1022 ` & 262024 & 56238.269 & 260 & 1.0 & 1399.4$\pm$11.9 & 81.5$\pm$10.6 & -0.27$\pm$0.00 & -0.42$\pm$0.00 & 332,15\
` 02383270-0640386` & ` NGC1022 ` & 262082 & 56239.249 & 260 & 1.0 & 1388.6$\pm$14.5 & 72.0$\pm$11.8 & -0.25$\pm$0.00 & -0.46$\pm$0.00 & 434,18\
` 02383986+4138512` & ` NGC0996 ` & 142576 & 55611.093 & 295 & 2.0 & 4303.7$\pm$13.8 & 239.3$\pm$8.6 & 0.24$\pm$0.23 & -0.03$\pm$0.28 & 4,3\
` 02384973+4127352` & ` NGC1000 ` & 161327 & 55890.320 & 270 & 1.0 & 4316.2$\pm$21.4 & 195.2$\pm$17.6 & - & - & 0,0\
` 02391496+3009060` & ` NGC1012 ` & 160325 & 55857.187 & 20 & 1.0 & 949.8$\pm$19.4 & 56.4$\pm$32.0 & -0.84$\pm$0.01 & 0.64$\pm$0.02 & 65,34\
` 02391689+4052202` & ` NGC1003 ` & 261975 & 56237.365 & 267 & 1.0 & 582.2$\pm$16.7 & 48.9$\pm$30.0 & -0.52$\pm$0.08 & 0.67$\pm$0.40 & 12,2\
` 02392368+0105376` & ` NGC1032 ` & 140992 & 55557.074 & 70 & 2.0 & 2656.2$\pm$14.6 & 210.7$\pm$7.0 & 0.16$\pm$0.09 & 0.49$\pm$0.31 & 12,2\
` 02402401+3903477` & ` NGC1023 ` & 262139 & 56241.388 & 280 & 1.0 & 570.5$\pm$13.1 & 211.0$\pm$3.2 & - & 0.20$\pm$0.30 & 1,2\
` 02402898+1917494` & ` NGC1036 ` & 262160 & 56242.155 & 195 & 1.0 & 754.9$\pm$4.7 & 13.8$\pm$29.7 & -0.76$\pm$0.02 & 0.64$\pm$0.04 & 30,20\
` 02402912-1116391` & ` NGC1045 ` & 341082 & 56312.061 & 245 & 1.0 & 4553.6$\pm$13.5 & 269.4$\pm$5.0 & 0.22$\pm$0.07 & 0.61$\pm$0.18 & 14,3\
` 02410480-0815209` & ` NGC1052 ` & 141261 & 55566.108 & 120 & 2.0 & 1453.1$\pm$14.2 & 220.4$\pm$7.5 & 0.07$\pm$0.00 & 0.47$\pm$0.01 & 133,20\
` 02413486+0711140` & ` MRK0595 ` & 162758 & 55959.101 & 295 & 2.0 & 7987.6$\pm$13.2 & 31.8$\pm$45.0 & -1.26$\pm$0.01 & 0.16$\pm$0.01 & 24,14\
` 02414523+0026354` & ` NGC1055 ` & 262568 & 56255.167 & 181 & 1.0 & 939.5$\pm$18.2 & 56.4$\pm$24.8 & -0.16$\pm$0.04 & -0.27$\pm$0.29 & 27,2\
` 02422903+1809528` & ` ARK090 ` & 162445 & 55950.156 & 295 & 2.0 & 9260.9$\pm$14.7 & 374.9$\pm$6.6 & 0.06$\pm$0.03 & 0.36$\pm$0.08 & 42,6\
` 02422903+1809528` & ` ARK090 ` & 162709 & 55958.133 & 295 & 1.0 & 9291.1$\pm$18.3 & 382.9$\pm$8.6 & 0.00$\pm$0.02 & 0.29$\pm$0.00 & 30,4\
` 02422903+1809528` & ` ARK090 ` & 163183 & 55976.085 & 205 & 1.0 & 9336.3$\pm$15.4 & 365.2$\pm$6.9 & 0.11$\pm$0.04 & 0.53$\pm$0.12 & 33,4\
` 02431242+4130022` & ` NGC1053 ` & 062007 & 55488.210 & 45 & 2.0 & 4709.8$\pm$15.1 & 294.8$\pm$7.1 & -0.06$\pm$0.07 & 0.22$\pm$0.19 & 12,3\
` 02431242+4130022` & ` NGC1053 ` & 062772 & 55507.139 & 45 & 2.0 & 4778.2$\pm$12.9 & 291.1$\pm$7.7 & -0.05$\pm$0.08 & 0.13$\pm$0.25 & 15,3\
` 02431504+3225300` & ` NGC1060 ` & 060936 & 55451.301 & 70 & 2.0 & 5063.7$\pm$14.1 & 326.1$\pm$6.9 & 0.32$\pm$0.09 & - & 9,0\
` 02431504+3225300` & ` NGC1060 ` & 060937 & 55451.316 & 70 & 2.0 & 5081.0$\pm$13.4 & 327.1$\pm$6.5 & 0.12$\pm$0.09 & 0.09$\pm$0.28 & 10,2\
` 02431504+3225300` & ` NGC1060 ` & 062020 & 55488.431 & 261 & 2.0 & 5076.7$\pm$14.5 & 315.1$\pm$5.5 & 0.16$\pm$0.07 & - & 11,1\
` 02431504+3225300` & ` NGC1060 ` & 062223 & 55497.409 & 261 & 2.0 & 5079.7$\pm$14.7 & 325.1$\pm$5.9 & 0.38$\pm$0.11 & - & 7,0\
` 02433005+3720283` & ` NGC1058 ` & 261969 & 56237.174 & 95 & 1.0 & 471.1$\pm$15.0 & 14.0$\pm$26.8 & 0.28$\pm$0.05 & 1.03$\pm$0.39 & 23,2\
` 02433460+4749238` & ` UGC02192 ` & 163184 & 55976.109 & 250 & 1.0 & 4980.9$\pm$14.0 & 177.0$\pm$10.9 & - & - & AGN\
` 02463391-0014493` & ` NGC1090 ` & 153674 & 55827.343 & 105 & 1.0 & 2715.4$\pm$9.5 & 64.6$\pm$11.5 & -0.22$\pm$0.07 & - & 16,1\
` 02470218+0839080` & ` UGC02255 ` & 153845 & 55831.320 & 85 & 2.0 & 7432.2$\pm$11.6 & 199.6$\pm$7.5 & 0.32$\pm$0.08 & 0.55$\pm$0.24 & 13,3\
` 02481741+5048012` & ` UGC02261 ` & 141320 & 55567.240 & 250 & 2.0 & 4803.3$\pm$17.2 & 326.8$\pm$13.1 & 0.35$\pm$0.10 & 0.38$\pm$0.36 & 15,2\
` 02481741+5048012` & ` UGC02261 ` & 141347 & 55569.227 & 250 & 2.0 & 4805.8$\pm$13.1 & 308.9$\pm$6.6 & 0.24$\pm$0.04 & 0.18$\pm$0.12 & 27,4\
` 02491961+0805334` & ` NGC1107 ` & 140339 & 55539.113 & 140 & 2.0 & 3318.2$\pm$12.4 & 228.2$\pm$8.0 & 0.29$\pm$0.12 & 0.37$\pm$0.25 & 12,2\
` 02510087+4657175` & ` IC0260 ` & 262442 & 56252.354 & 340 & 1.0 & 8512.3$\pm$12.7 & 289.3$\pm$6.6 & 0.35$\pm$0.16 & 0.16$\pm$0.31 & 9,3\
` 02542739+4134467` & ` NGC1129 ` & 060163 & 55418.401 & 100 & 2.0 & 5255.7$\pm$15.5 & 229.1$\pm$8.1 & - & - & 1,0\
` 02542739+4134467` & ` NGC1129 ` & 060164 & 55418.415 & 100 & 2.0 & 5272.4$\pm$16.3 & 232.1$\pm$7.8 & - & - & 0,0\
` 02542739+4134467` & ` NGC1129 ` & 060194 & 55419.399 & 85 & 2.0 & 5234.6$\pm$14.8 & 229.2$\pm$9.0 & - & - & 0,0\
` 02542739+4134467` & ` NGC1129 ` & 060195 & 55419.411 & 85 & 2.0 & 5237.9$\pm$14.1 & 233.2$\pm$9.8 & - & - & 1,0\
` 02573365+0558371` & ` PGC011179 ` & 152742 & 55795.412 & 150 & 2.0 & 6707.9$\pm$14.2 & 290.7$\pm$8.7 & 0.00$\pm$0.10 & -0.33$\pm$0.21 & 11,2\
` 02573365+0558371` & ` PGC011179 ` & 260594 & 56187.336 & 150 & 1.0 & 6727.5$\pm$13.5 & 303.1$\pm$5.9 & 0.17$\pm$0.14 & -0.07$\pm$0.36 & 10,2\
` 02573365+0558371` & ` PGC011179 ` & 340398 & 56279.246 & 150 & 1.0 & 6726.4$\pm$14.9 & 290.2$\pm$7.5 & 0.13$\pm$0.16 & 0.45$\pm$0.65 & 9,2\
` 02581028+0321429` & ` NGC1153 ` & 142171 & 55598.092 & 240 & 2.0 & 2990.7$\pm$14.2 & 232.6$\pm$5.8 & 0.33$\pm$0.07 & - & 11,1\
` 02581392+1107596` & ` ARK094 ` & 261971 & 56237.208 & 155 & 1.0 & 7633.9$\pm$11.0 & 239.2$\pm$5.4 & -0.51$\pm$0.46 & -0.46$\pm$0.37 & 2,2\
` 02585781+1334583` & ` UGC02450 ` & 153098 & 55804.387 & 215 & 2.0 & 21410.9$\pm$16.3 & 261.6$\pm$15.9 & 0.29$\pm$0.24 & - & 3,1\
` 03005943+4301034` & ` UGC02470 ` & 142607 & 55612.114 & 350 & 2.0 & 4696.9$\pm$14.3 & 164.7$\pm$10.7 & -0.14$\pm$0.34 & -0.37$\pm$0.37 & 3,3\
` 03020668+4135371` & ` UGC02495 ` & 142478 & 55608.138 & 280 & 2.0 & 8906.9$\pm$15.0 & 209.4$\pm$8.2 & 0.36$\pm$0.04 & - & 18,0\
` 03033053-0214539` & ` PGC011516 ` & 153825 & 55830.370 & 210 & 2.0 & 5983.8$\pm$13.4 & 138.4$\pm$11.7 & -0.02$\pm$0.17 & - & 4,0\
` 03034909-0106129` & ` NGC1194 ` & 162707 & 55958.095 & 145 & 1.0 & 4011.1$\pm$12.1 & 170.8$\pm$4.9 & -0.28$\pm$0.01 & 1.25$\pm$0.04 & 57,8\
` 03044401+5406473` & ` PGC011586 ` & 140713 & 55546.075 & 35 & 2.0 & 2467.1$\pm$28.9 & 47.8$\pm$69.3 & -0.65$\pm$0.28 & - & 4,0\
` 03053486+0608001` & ` PGC011621 ` & 340876 & 56305.182 & 150 & 1.0 & 11197.0$\pm$17.0 & 256.1$\pm$11.3 & 0.50$\pm$0.21 & -0.59$\pm$0.43 & 4,2\
` 03055539+5415579` & ` PGC011632 ` & 152821 & 55797.383 & 120 & 2.0 & 2172.3$\pm$14.4 & 221.3$\pm$13.0 & - & - & 1,0\
` 03055539+5415579` & ` PGC011632 ` & 152822 & 55797.394 & 120 & 2.0 & 2189.0$\pm$16.0 & 243.6$\pm$12.8 & -2.02$\pm$0.33 & -1.70$\pm$0.54 & 3,1\
` 03060989+4222189` & ` IC0284 ` & 261583 & 56221.447 & 195 & 1.0 & 2669.0$\pm$9.9 & 57.2$\pm$17.8 & -0.43$\pm$0.03 & -0.36$\pm$0.18 & 41,4\
` 03061191-0932288` & ` NGC1208 ` & 160685 & 55865.300 & 255 & 2.0 & 4401.9$\pm$14.3 & 218.1$\pm$7.4 & 0.58$\pm$0.06 & - & 12,0\
` 03062435+5234549` & ` PGC2418553 ` & 261484 & 56219.430 & 255 & 2.0 & 10647.7$\pm$14.1 & 172.1$\pm$15.9 & 0.69$\pm$0.39 & - & 4,0\
` 03062848-0943518` & ` IC1880 ` & 153790 & 55829.411 & 220 & 2.0 & 9656.4$\pm$15.6 & 241.4$\pm$12.7 & 0.40$\pm$0.04 & 0.51$\pm$0.12 & 36,7\
` 03071837-0936454` & ` NGC1216 ` & 160769 & 55866.303 & 245 & 2.0 & 5118.6$\pm$13.5 & 146.3$\pm$10.2 & 0.45$\pm$0.05 & - & 21,0\
` 03073290+4223151` & ` IC0288 ` & 140338 & 55539.070 & 40 & 2.0 & 5059.3$\pm$14.8 & 189.2$\pm$9.0 & -0.33$\pm$0.37 & - & 2,0\
` 03081551+3822557` & ` NGC1207 ` & 153550 & 55822.298 & 181 & 2.0 & 4715.3$\pm$16.8 & 162.3$\pm$15.2 & -0.28$\pm$0.01 & -0.40$\pm$0.06 & 132,5\
` 03082624+0406388` & ` NGC1218 ` & 261444 & 56218.405 & 155 & 1.0 & 8484.8$\pm$14.6 & 341.8$\pm$9.6 & 0.59$\pm$0.08 & - & 16,1\
` 03085519+7033477` & ` UGC02542 ` & 141624 & 55576.074 & -20 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 03104409+6106477` & ` PGC2797416 ` & 140808 & 55549.279 & 335 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 03104409+6106477` & ` PGC2797416 ` & 141848 & 55585.151 & 335 & 2.0 & 2432.4$\pm$21.9 & 279.5$\pm$19.1 & -0.33$\pm$0.18 & - & 12,1\
` 03111355+4121494` & ` NGC1224 ` & 142554 & 55610.126 & 185 & 2.0 & 5032.3$\pm$15.5 & 213.0$\pm$13.8 & -0.24$\pm$0.04 & -0.13$\pm$0.25 & 13,3\
` 03130881-0243191` & ` PGC3095627 ` & 261522 & 56220.374 & 165 & 1.0 & 8101.0$\pm$17.0 & 164.9$\pm$14.2 & 0.26$\pm$0.03 & 1.19$\pm$0.07 & 71,7\
` 03135317+6232589` & ` PGC138608 ` & 152595 & 55783.456 & 30 & 2.0 & 2007.1$\pm$21.9 & 289.0$\pm$22.9 & -0.03$\pm$0.06 & 0.40$\pm$0.26 & 27,1\
` 03140848+4244570` & ` PGC012039 ` & 161183 & 55886.133 & 170 & 2.0 & 5276.2$\pm$14.8 & 255.6$\pm$9.7 & 0.07$\pm$0.59 & - & 2,0\
` 03160262+3706452` & ` IC1901 ` & 162957 & 55968.152 & 345 & 1.0 & 5197.1$\pm$13.5 & 203.0$\pm$6.0 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03170362+4138012` & ` PGC012193 ` & 142946 & 55619.100 & 361 & 2.0 & 7112.1$\pm$13.1 & 254.0$\pm$7.3 & -0.18$\pm$0.20 & - & 5,0\
` 03184497+4128041` & ` NGC1267 ` & 153788 & 55829.309 & 70 & 2.0 & 5241.1$\pm$16.0 & 267.9$\pm$11.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 03185814+4128121` & ` NGC1270 ` & 060095 & 55415.418 & 18 & 2.0 & 4903.9$\pm$13.3 & 385.5$\pm$7.1 & -0.04$\pm$0.15 & -0.57$\pm$0.17 & 5,2\
` 03185814+4128121` & ` NGC1270 ` & 060096 & 55415.436 & 18 & 2.0 & 4909.6$\pm$14.5 & 391.8$\pm$6.2 & -0.60$\pm$0.50 & - & 2,0\
` 03185814+4128121` & ` NGC1270 ` & 060097 & 55415.454 & 18 & 2.0 & 4917.6$\pm$14.8 & 389.5$\pm$6.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03185814+4128121` & ` NGC1270 ` & 062008 & 55488.229 & 85 & 2.0 & 4912.0$\pm$15.1 & 405.5$\pm$6.6 & -0.52$\pm$0.27 & -0.28$\pm$0.25 & 3,2\
` 03185814+4128121` & ` NGC1270 ` & 062773 & 55507.172 & 85 & 2.0 & 4892.8$\pm$12.5 & 422.2$\pm$8.3 & - & - & 1,1\
` 03185814+4128121` & ` NGC1270 ` & 153899 & 55833.279 & 34 & 1.0 & 4899.3$\pm$14.5 & 422.2$\pm$6.4 & -0.22$\pm$0.33 & - & 4,0\
` 03185814+4128121` & ` NGC1270 ` & 153934 & 55835.274 & 124 & 1.0 & 4929.7$\pm$14.5 & 405.4$\pm$7.7 & 0.08$\pm$0.51 & - & 2,1\
` 03191127+4121120` & ` NGC1271 ` & 142530 & 55609.136 & 310 & 2.0 & 5867.0$\pm$16.2 & 325.3$\pm$11.2 & - & - & 0,1\
` 03191127+4121120` & ` NGC1271 ` & 161375 & 55893.120 & 130 & 1.0 & 5870.8$\pm$14.3 & 308.2$\pm$8.3 & -0.90$\pm$0.26 & -0.80$\pm$0.27 & 6,3\
` 03191127+4121120` & ` NGC1271 ` & 253481 & 56138.436 & 130 & 1.0 & 5877.9$\pm$14.6 & 314.6$\pm$9.6 & -0.73$\pm$0.45 & -0.29$\pm$0.53 & 2,1\
` 03192129+4129261` & ` NGC1272 ` & 060260 & 55421.395 & 12 & 2.0 & 3750.6$\pm$15.6 & 290.6$\pm$9.2 & -0.68$\pm$0.35 & -0.72$\pm$0.38 & 1,2\
` 03192129+4129261` & ` NGC1272 ` & 060261 & 55421.407 & 12 & 2.0 & 3742.8$\pm$14.5 & 295.6$\pm$7.8 & - & -0.44$\pm$0.48 & 1,1\
` 03192129+4129261` & ` NGC1272 ` & 060331 & 55423.398 & 12 & 2.0 & 3721.6$\pm$16.2 & 287.4$\pm$7.8 & -0.72$\pm$0.47 & -1.27$\pm$0.20 & 1,2\
` 03192129+4129261` & ` NGC1272 ` & 060332 & 55423.411 & 12 & 2.0 & 3731.3$\pm$14.0 & 272.7$\pm$8.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03194313+0945079` & ` UGC02674 ` & 062732 & 55506.380 & 300 & 2.0 & 7323.2$\pm$10.8 & 194.2$\pm$7.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03194823+4130420` & ` NGC1275 ` & 060510 & 55428.385 & 100 & 2.0 & 5155.0$\pm$18.5 & 286.9$\pm$29.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 03194823+4130420` & ` NGC1275 ` & 060511 & 55428.400 & 100 & 2.0 & 5209.6$\pm$20.2 & 277.6$\pm$20.2 & - & - & AGN\
` 03194823+4130420` & ` NGC1275 ` & 060512 & 55428.419 & 100 & 2.0 & 5163.8$\pm$24.3 & 268.3$\pm$26.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 03194823+4130420` & ` NGC1275 ` & 140052 & 55533.108 & 99 & 2.0 & 5118.1$\pm$22.9 & 269.3$\pm$32.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 03194823+4130420` & ` NGC1275 ` & 140249 & 55537.323 & 325 & 2.0 & 5171.7$\pm$20.1 & 275.8$\pm$22.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 03195148+4134242` & ` NGC1277 ` & 140600 & 55544.080 & 95 & 2.0 & 4960.9$\pm$14.0 & 400.4$\pm$6.5 & -0.12$\pm$0.23 & 0.13$\pm$0.29 & 6,2\
` 03195148+4134242` & ` NGC1277 ` & 142332 & 55604.142 & 365 & 2.0 & 5002.1$\pm$15.0 & 344.0$\pm$7.7 & -0.21$\pm$0.12 & -0.21$\pm$0.18 & 7,3\
` 03195148+4134242` & ` NGC1277 ` & 153260 & 55807.352 & 95 & 1.0 & 4983.9$\pm$13.5 & 397.8$\pm$7.5 & 0.98$\pm$0.37 & -0.31$\pm$0.21 & 2,2\
` 03195148+4134242` & ` NGC1277 ` & 153844 & 55831.301 & 185 & 1.0 & 5096.0$\pm$14.1 & 358.4$\pm$6.5 & 0.20$\pm$0.13 & - & 7,0\
` 03195148+4134242` & ` NGC1277 ` & 160930 & 55873.177 & 5 & 1.0 & 5056.1$\pm$18.5 & 319.7$\pm$11.7 & -0.21$\pm$0.38 & - & 2,0\
` 03195148+4134242` & ` NGC1277 ` & 162542 & 55953.193 & 275 & 1.0 & 4974.1$\pm$14.8 & 387.2$\pm$5.9 & -0.33$\pm$0.21 & -0.49$\pm$0.34 & 6,2\
` 03195148+4134242` & ` NGC1277 ` & 163185 & 55976.127 & 300 & 1.0 & 4976.1$\pm$13.9 & 395.3$\pm$8.0 & 0.03$\pm$0.14 & -0.43$\pm$0.31 & 9,2\
` 03195416+4133482` & ` NGC1278 ` & 162885 & 55966.157 & 320 & 1.0 & 5960.6$\pm$13.5 & 271.2$\pm$11.9 & 0.34$\pm$0.19 & - & 6,0\
` 03200610+4137483` & ` NGC1281 ` & 060475 & 55427.377 & 85 & 2.0 & 4186.4$\pm$14.8 & 298.9$\pm$6.3 & -0.04$\pm$0.28 & - & 3,1\
` 03200610+4137483` & ` NGC1281 ` & 060476 & 55427.392 & 85 & 2.0 & 4206.0$\pm$14.8 & 287.9$\pm$7.3 & -0.08$\pm$0.38 & - & 3,0\
` 03200610+4137483` & ` NGC1281 ` & 060477 & 55427.407 & 85 & 2.0 & 4205.0$\pm$15.1 & 291.3$\pm$7.7 & -0.58$\pm$0.17 & - & 4,0\
` 03201214+4122012` & ` NGC1282 ` & 140665 & 55545.070 & 25 & 2.0 & 2168.6$\pm$14.6 & 204.0$\pm$10.1 & 0.12$\pm$0.56 & - & 2,1\
` 03201214+4122012` & ` NGC1282 ` & 261441 & 56218.222 & 25 & 1.0 & 2171.9$\pm$12.7 & 209.9$\pm$6.5 & -0.68$\pm$0.38 & -0.80$\pm$0.42 & 3,2\
` 03205776+4130229` & ` PGC012557 ` & 160331 & 55857.454 & 295 & 2.0 & 4915.2$\pm$13.3 & 302.4$\pm$7.3 & 1.10$\pm$0.26 & 0.31$\pm$0.18 & 2,3\
` 03205786+4153377` & ` IC0313 ` & 142680 & 55615.120 & 230 & 2.0 & 4371.9$\pm$13.3 & 240.4$\pm$7.8 & 0.28$\pm$0.08 & 0.50$\pm$0.36 & 13,2\
` 03210041+4133449` & ` PGC012562 ` & 161351 & 55892.353 & 260 & 2.0 & 4640.8$\pm$14.8 & 285.6$\pm$7.8 & - & - & 0,2\
` 03210041+4133449` & ` PGC012562 ` & 261366 & 56215.237 & 80 & 1.0 & 4634.0$\pm$16.2 & 298.7$\pm$7.7 & 0.58$\pm$0.70 & -0.66$\pm$0.47 & 2,2\
` 03210041+4133449` & ` PGC012562 ` & 340553 & 56283.055 & 80 & 1.0 & 4655.1$\pm$16.0 & 282.7$\pm$7.5 & 0.11$\pm$0.35 & - & 4,1\
` 03210915+6655186` & ` PGC2797207 ` & 140721 & 55546.207 & 364 & 2.0 & 2360.2$\pm$22.5 & 247.1$\pm$18.6 & -0.40$\pm$0.15 & -0.55$\pm$0.42 & 15,2\
` 03212081+4127359` & ` PGC012580 ` & 153640 & 55826.303 & 95 & 2.0 & 4532.9$\pm$14.1 & 249.2$\pm$8.0 & - & - & 0,2\
` 03212772+4048059` & ` UGC02689 ` & 261970 & 56237.192 & 110 & 1.0 & 6041.4$\pm$12.7 & 187.3$\pm$6.6 & 0.33$\pm$0.22 & - & 7,0\
` 03213647+4123340` & ` NGC1293 ` & 153305 & 55808.362 & 1 & 2.0 & 4129.0$\pm$15.0 & 243.2$\pm$8.5 & - & - & 0,1\
` 03220285+4051500` & ` UGC02698 ` & 060232 & 55420.424 & 91 & 2.0 & 6380.4$\pm$13.5 & 384.4$\pm$9.1 & -0.06$\pm$0.12 & - & 4,0\
` 03220285+4051500` & ` UGC02698 ` & 060233 & 55420.437 & 91 & 2.0 & 6360.9$\pm$13.1 & 375.2$\pm$9.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03220285+4051500` & ` UGC02698 ` & 060756 & 55445.342 & 91 & 2.0 & 6362.8$\pm$14.7 & 368.8$\pm$9.3 & - & - & 0,1\
` 03220285+4051500` & ` UGC02698 ` & 060757 & 55445.357 & 91 & 2.0 & 6350.8$\pm$15.8 & 364.0$\pm$9.7 & -0.74$\pm$0.34 & 0.05$\pm$0.52 & 3,1\
` 03220285+4051500` & ` UGC02698 ` & 153935 & 55835.290 & 110 & 1.0 & 6338.5$\pm$14.2 & 368.4$\pm$9.3 & -0.19$\pm$0.22 & -0.41$\pm$0.49 & 6,2\
` 03260309+4115084` & ` UGC02733 ` & 142578 & 55611.129 & 240 & 2.0 & 5266.4$\pm$15.5 & 271.6$\pm$7.6 & -0.10$\pm$0.21 & - & 4,0\
` 03275526+3959497` & ` PGC213218 ` & 163445 & 55981.115 & 361 & 2.0 & 7334.6$\pm$13.2 & 290.6$\pm$8.3 & 0.07$\pm$0.07 & 0.13$\pm$0.26 & 18,3\
` 03280595-0823190` & ` NGC1337 ` & 341121 & 56315.089 & 190 & 1.0 & 1178.0$\pm$27.6 & 36.0$\pm$39.1 & -0.38$\pm$0.04 & - & 5,0\
` 03292389+3947318` & ` UGC02755 ` & 062827 & 55508.176 & 88 & 2.0 & 7204.8$\pm$15.0 & 280.5$\pm$8.3 & 0.51$\pm$0.11 & 0.45$\pm$0.35 & 10,3\
` 03320732+4747385` & ` UGC02773 ` & 261526 & 56220.462 & 285 & 1.0 & 169.3$\pm$22.6 & 58.3$\pm$36.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 03341837+3921243` & ` UGC02783 ` & 140347 & 55539.342 & 290 & 2.0 & 6054.4$\pm$13.4 & 304.5$\pm$9.6 & 0.41$\pm$0.17 & - & 7,0\
` 03370592-0502339` & ` NGC1376 ` & 153732 & 55828.415 & 210 & 1.0 & 4084.7$\pm$16.1 & 56.0$\pm$20.4 & -0.45$\pm$0.03 & -0.64$\pm$0.20 & 34,3\
` 03380124+6642455` & ` 2M03380 ` & 153359 & 55810.466 & 400 & 2.0 & 5833.6$\pm$27.3 & 289.3$\pm$21.2 & -0.34$\pm$0.11 & - & 19,0\
` 03381210+6642567` & ` PGC2690279 ` & 153846 & 55831.379 & 455 & 2.0 & 5236.5$\pm$38.7 & 378.6$\pm$29.7 & -0.20$\pm$0.21 & - & 12,0\
` 03411752+1523477` & ` PGC1483518 ` & 061973 & 55487.274 & 90 & 2.0 & 8673.3$\pm$17.8 & 305.8$\pm$10.9 & 0.52$\pm$0.43 & - & 3,0\
` 03411752+1523477` & ` PGC1483518 ` & 140340 & 55539.132 & 121 & 2.0 & 8696.0$\pm$17.8 & 330.0$\pm$10.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03445844+4558030` & ` UGC02844 ` & 140287 & 55538.130 & 40 & 2.0 & 4847.1$\pm$14.0 & 342.4$\pm$8.5 & 0.02$\pm$0.15 & 0.03$\pm$0.19 & 11,4\
` 03445844+4558030` & ` UGC02844 ` & 160683 & 55865.217 & 40 & 1.0 & 4864.2$\pm$12.3 & 319.6$\pm$9.3 & -0.07$\pm$0.13 & -0.10$\pm$0.19 & 15,4\
` 03462726-0358075` & ` NGC1453 ` & 060902 & 55450.446 & 199 & 2.0 & 3865.0$\pm$14.7 & 312.8$\pm$6.2 & 0.35$\pm$0.03 & 0.50$\pm$0.10 & 22,4\
` 03462726-0358075` & ` NGC1453 ` & 060903 & 55450.458 & 199 & 2.0 & 3873.4$\pm$14.4 & 323.1$\pm$6.5 & 0.31$\pm$0.03 & 0.34$\pm$0.07 & 25,5\
` 03480074+3306417` & ` PGC2023632 ` & 141765 & 55583.228 & 255 & 2.0 & 4143.4$\pm$27.0 & 272.3$\pm$26.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03480074+3306417` & ` PGC2023632 ` & 142531 & 55609.154 & 255 & 2.0 & 4121.7$\pm$23.1 & 225.1$\pm$26.1 & - & - & 0,0\
` 03482073+7007583` & ` UGC02855 ` & 153486 & 55818.470 & 360 & 2.0 & 1173.0$\pm$27.6 & 81.8$\pm$52.2 & -0.31$\pm$0.01 & -0.74$\pm$0.26 & 77,2\
` 03501487+7005409` & ` UGC02866 ` & 153608 & 55825.452 & 70 & 2.0 & 1272.9$\pm$16.9 & 128.9$\pm$24.1 & -0.31$\pm$0.00 & -0.42$\pm$0.02 & 475,15\
` 03502828+5122423` & ` PGC2393112 ` & 162958 & 55968.171 & 340 & 2.0 & 4754.1$\pm$51.1 & 253.1$\pm$79.8 & -1.11$\pm$0.57 & - & 2,0\
` 03521694+3614129` & ` UGC02881 ` & 143484 & 55632.107 & 210 & 2.0 & 5626.8$\pm$13.1 & 188.5$\pm$14.7 & 0.15$\pm$0.06 & 0.68$\pm$0.37 & 25,1\
` 03531336+6020218` & ` PGC165379 ` & 142874 & 55618.094 & 260 & 2.0 & 5341.7$\pm$13.8 & 125.2$\pm$23.8 & -0.23$\pm$0.02 & 0.09$\pm$0.17 & 43,3\
` 03533191+3229343` & ` NGC1465 ` & 060198 & 55419.437 & 163 & 2.0 & 4067.9$\pm$14.2 & 267.9$\pm$5.5 & 0.45$\pm$0.07 & - & 7,1\
` 03533191+3229343` & ` NGC1465 ` & 060199 & 55419.451 & 163 & 2.0 & 4032.5$\pm$13.8 & 260.8$\pm$7.4 & 0.40$\pm$0.06 & - & 8,1\
` 03543327-0255046` & ` PGC145850 ` & 261523 & 56220.392 & 260 & 1.0 & 4014.1$\pm$14.7 & 254.7$\pm$8.1 & 0.25$\pm$0.19 & 0.39$\pm$0.47 & 10,2\
` 04002774+6834398` & ` NGC1469 ` & 061656 & 55480.378 & -30 & 2.0 & 1036.5$\pm$13.7 & 259.0$\pm$6.6 & 0.02$\pm$0.02 & 0.44$\pm$0.06 & 32,4\
` 04002774+6834398` & ` NGC1469 ` & 061657 & 55480.392 & -30 & 2.0 & 1042.2$\pm$13.7 & 264.1$\pm$6.3 & -0.01$\pm$0.02 & 0.45$\pm$0.07 & 31,3\
` 04020678+2307585` & ` NGC1497 ` & 261629 & 56223.257 & 55 & 1.0 & 6158.8$\pm$13.7 & 254.8$\pm$7.0 & 0.42$\pm$0.03 & 0.79$\pm$0.09 & 39,4\
` 04034219+4643428` & ` UGC02937 ` & 163600 & 55984.138 & 355 & 2.0 & 4450.1$\pm$14.0 & 234.8$\pm$11.2 & 0.01$\pm$0.21 & 0.13$\pm$0.29 & 7,2\
` 04034287+1953415` & ` IC0358 ` & 261375 & 56215.282 & 60 & 1.0 & 6696.0$\pm$30.2 & 287.1$\pm$25.8 & -0.22$\pm$0.54 & - & 3,0\
` 04034287+1953415` & ` IC0358 ` & 261578 & 56221.274 & 60 & 1.0 & 6680.4$\pm$14.1 & 284.4$\pm$7.4 & 0.21$\pm$0.16 & 0.64$\pm$0.31 & 8,2\
` 04035523-1110446` & ` NGC1509 ` & 341241 & 56317.101 & 255 & 1.0 & 8693.8$\pm$16.0 & 153.5$\pm$11.5 & -0.38$\pm$0.01 & -0.61$\pm$0.03 & 120,13\
` 04063774+3022344` & ` PGC014467 ` & 060826 & 55447.381 & 101 & 2.0 & 5306.7$\pm$19.1 & 292.6$\pm$15.4 & -0.86$\pm$0.84 & -0.25$\pm$0.73 & 2,1\
` 04074690+6948447` & ` IC0356 ` & 153507 & 55821.452 & 285 & 1.0 & 861.8$\pm$12.7 & 162.5$\pm$6.5 & 0.28$\pm$0.05 & 0.49$\pm$0.23 & 21,2\
` 04115279+3447522` & ` PGC2054700 ` & 261577 & 56221.257 & 135 & 1.0 & 6235.1$\pm$10.7 & 120.3$\pm$10.6 & 0.14$\pm$0.13 & - & 17,0\
` 04122834+2742065` & ` IC0359 ` & 062774 & 55507.224 & 35 & 2.0 & 3904.7$\pm$13.6 & 219.5$\pm$8.2 & 0.27$\pm$0.04 & 0.52$\pm$0.16 & 29,4\
` 04164020+3451101` & ` PGC2055576 ` & 342692 & 56366.098 & 350 & 1.0 & 9921.4$\pm$13.9 & 173.9$\pm$7.7 & -0.08$\pm$0.10 & - & 3,0\
` 04191415+0320536` & ` IC0365 ` & 141710 & 55580.079 & 210 & 2.0 & 7321.0$\pm$14.8 & 250.6$\pm$10.6 & 0.36$\pm$0.12 & 0.57$\pm$0.30 & 8,2\
` 04193792+0224355` & ` NGC1551 ` & 153310 & 55808.441 & 210 & 2.0 & 3718.2$\pm$17.5 & 334.5$\pm$9.9 & - & - & 0,2\
` 04201768-0041336` & ` NGC1552 ` & 061905 & 55485.354 & 110 & 2.0 & 4887.0$\pm$14.2 & 247.6$\pm$7.1 & 0.55$\pm$0.05 & 0.84$\pm$0.13 & 14,2\
` 04212943+3656572` & ` 2M04212 ` & 152823 & 55797.416 & 130 & 2.0 & 5656.7$\pm$16.8 & 252.4$\pm$13.7 & -0.44$\pm$0.15 & - & 7,1\
` 04215763+0150202` & ` UGC03023 ` & 060901 & 55450.427 & 80 & 2.0 & 3930.6$\pm$13.8 & 219.6$\pm$7.3 & -1.75$\pm$0.15 & -2.05$\pm$0.27 & 4,2\
` 04222658+2717521` & ` UGC03024 ` & 141862 & 55585.237 & 315 & 2.0 & 5174.3$\pm$18.3 & 290.5$\pm$15.4 & 0.02$\pm$0.13 & 0.09$\pm$0.44 & 14,2\
` 04222658+2717521` & ` UGC03024 ` & 143485 & 55632.125 & 315 & 2.0 & 5182.7$\pm$24.0 & 273.5$\pm$25.3 & -0.21$\pm$0.20 & - & 7,1\
` 04275732+2619180` & ` PGC138729 ` & 260381 & 56165.425 & 106 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 04275732+2619180` & ` PGC138729 ` & 340395 & 56279.118 & 120 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 04284494+6934458` & ` PGC015211 ` & 141625 & 55576.144 & 50 & 2.0 & 4613.8$\pm$16.0 & 189.9$\pm$9.4 & 0.80$\pm$0.26 & - & 3,0\
` 04303992+0039421` & ` NGC1587 ` & 160773 & 55866.406 & 225 & 2.0 & 3627.8$\pm$13.7 & 239.3$\pm$6.0 & 0.28$\pm$0.04 & 0.93$\pm$0.12 & 19,3\
` 04304545+0051491` & ` NGC1589 ` & 262593 & 56256.344 & 160 & 1.0 & 3733.1$\pm$13.7 & 194.7$\pm$4.8 & -0.05$\pm$0.02 & 1.10$\pm$0.15 & 52,2\
` 04304918+6450525` & ` NGC1569 ` & 261745 & 56229.328 & -62 & 1.0 & -105.7$\pm$22.3 & 93.8$\pm$35.0 & -1.23$\pm$0.01 & 0.84$\pm$0.00 & 29,169\
` 04310522+2324076` & ` 2M04310 ` & 152824 & 55797.434 & 150 & 2.0 & 5019.3$\pm$23.3 & 283.9$\pm$18.1 & 0.06$\pm$0.06 & 0.32$\pm$0.31 & 29,2\
` 04313985-0505099` & ` NGC1600 ` & 140343 & 55539.251 & 185 & 2.0 & 4651.6$\pm$14.8 & 343.6$\pm$7.6 & - & - & 0,2\
` 04315707+5925473` & ` PGC165398 ` & 163326 & 55978.120 & 260 & 2.0 & 4539.3$\pm$13.5 & 196.5$\pm$10.9 & 0.37$\pm$0.07 & 1.01$\pm$0.43 & 19,1\
` 04324860+2929578` & ` PGC089985 ` & 140525 & 55543.129 & 140 & 2.0 & 1983.5$\pm$34.3 & 34.0$\pm$54.6 & -0.20$\pm$0.01 & -0.40$\pm$0.12 & 337,4\
` 04331106+0521151` & ` 3C120 ` & 140200 & 55536.206 & 139 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & AGN\
` 04340002-0834445` & ` NGC1614 ` & 262028 & 56238.357 & 200 & 1.0 & 4644.8$\pm$17.0 & 147.3$\pm$22.3 & -0.01$\pm$0.00 & -0.31$\pm$0.01 & 539,117\
` 04350397+7315446` & ` NGC1573 ` & 140120 & 55534.272 & 390 & 2.0 & 4160.1$\pm$13.3 & 305.5$\pm$8.7 & - & -1.64$\pm$0.47 & 1,1\
` 04360101+1957008` & ` NGC1615 ` & 060760 & 55445.409 & 120 & 2.0 & 3354.8$\pm$14.3 & 137.5$\pm$9.9 & - & - & 1,0\
` 04360101+1957008` & ` NGC1615 ` & 060761 & 55445.423 & 120 & 2.0 & 3329.8$\pm$14.0 & 143.3$\pm$10.8 & - & - & 1,0\
` 04362230-1022346` & ` MRK0618 ` & 153903 & 55833.454 & 178 & 2.0 & 10428.2$\pm$23.9 & 84.9$\pm$54.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 04362230-1022346` & ` MRK0618 ` & 162540 & 55953.127 & 178 & 2.0 & 10431.5$\pm$28.0 & 134.4$\pm$38.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 04363734-0008370` & ` NGC1620 ` & 162297 & 55946.202 & 200 & 1.0 & 3463.0$\pm$14.5 & 73.7$\pm$14.2 & -0.08$\pm$0.07 & 0.25$\pm$0.35 & 20,2\
` 04370366+2456067` & ` 2M04370 ` & 341482 & 56329.205 & 210 & 1.0 & 4780.2$\pm$16.9 & 95.2$\pm$18.3 & 0.15$\pm$0.03 & 1.17$\pm$0.15 & 43,4\
` 04370757-0218166` & ` UGC03105 ` & 062148 & 55495.418 & 245 & 2.0 & 8667.9$\pm$16.9 & 302.1$\pm$15.3 & 0.08$\pm$0.19 & 0.09$\pm$0.43 & 7,2\
` 04371939+2447120` & ` PGC3097125 ` & 142555 & 55610.185 & 175 & 2.0 & 5036.2$\pm$40.1 & 308.6$\pm$32.0 & 0.02$\pm$0.10 & 0.09$\pm$0.35 & 17,2\
` 04381542+4841393` & ` PGC015704 ` & 143572 & 55635.132 & 275 & 2.0 & 5638.4$\pm$49.5 & 138.7$\pm$94.4 & - & - & AGN\
` 04395859+2454274` & ` PGC3097126 ` & 141793 & 55584.253 & 165 & 2.0 & 3790.8$\pm$23.3 & 187.6$\pm$22.8 & -0.00$\pm$0.16 & - & 11,0\
` 04412822-0251289` & ` NGC1637 ` & 260947 & 56201.418 & 212 & 1.0 & 686.4$\pm$15.0 & 34.3$\pm$17.2 & -0.21$\pm$0.00 & -0.49$\pm$0.02 & 289,15\
` 04454736-0223340` & ` NGC1653 ` & 142796 & 55617.078 & 175 & 2.0 & 4277.6$\pm$13.0 & 240.1$\pm$6.4 & 0.22$\pm$0.04 & 0.71$\pm$0.13 & 20,3\
` 04473623-0109428` & ` UGC03170 ` & 261580 & 56221.355 & 120 & 1.0 & 8820.3$\pm$14.6 & 203.4$\pm$4.9 & 0.27$\pm$0.10 & 0.90$\pm$0.54 & 12,1\
` 04483720-0619114` & ` NGC1667 ` & 261582 & 56221.390 & 181 & 1.0 & 4496.9$\pm$10.4 & 160.1$\pm$4.6 & 0.39$\pm$0.01 & 1.15$\pm$0.03 & 99,12\
` 04493401+0015103` & ` NGC1671 ` & 262569 & 56255.261 & 130 & 1.0 & 6279.6$\pm$14.2 & 244.9$\pm$6.2 & 0.31$\pm$0.06 & 0.65$\pm$0.24 & 20,3\
` 04500668+4503057` & ` PGC016124 ` & 142736 & 55616.174 & 245 & 2.0 & 5982.6$\pm$56.9 & 328.5$\pm$108.6 & 0.17$\pm$1.29 & - & 3,0\
` 04500668+4503057` & ` PGC016124 ` & 142737 & 55616.186 & 245 & 2.0 & 5932.2$\pm$53.3 & 239.0$\pm$85.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 04513544-0237235` & ` NGC1678 ` & 142945 & 55619.081 & 250 & 2.0 & 4585.1$\pm$12.3 & 263.3$\pm$7.8 & - & - & 0,2\
` 04520479+4932446` & ` PGC168563 ` & 152910 & 55799.448 & 15 & 2.0 & 8302.8$\pm$69.2 & 461.5$\pm$110.7 & - & - & AGN\
` 04523116-0306220` & ` NGC1684 ` & 061547 & 55478.410 & 135 & 2.0 & 4448.2$\pm$13.3 & 268.6$\pm$6.4 & -0.02$\pm$0.02 & 0.39$\pm$0.15 & 30,3\
` 04523116-0306220` & ` NGC1684 ` & 061548 & 55478.422 & 135 & 2.0 & 4468.8$\pm$13.8 & 269.8$\pm$6.8 & -0.06$\pm$0.02 & 0.13$\pm$0.12 & 30,4\
` 04525281+5204476` & ` PGC016235 ` & 260552 & 56181.397 & -10 & 2.0 & 9652.7$\pm$121.5 & 693.7$\pm$176.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 04525281+5204476` & ` PGC016235 ` & 340495 & 56282.125 & -10 & 2.0 & 9508.0$\pm$76.3 & 365.6$\pm$51.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 04532576+0403416` & ` PGC016263 ` & 341332 & 56323.184 & 215 & 1.0 & 8632.7$\pm$14.6 & 137.5$\pm$15.2 & -0.45$\pm$0.00 & 1.11$\pm$0.00 & 80,37\
` 04543832+0316045` & ` NGC1691 ` & 140726 & 55546.307 & 210 & 2.0 & 4535.4$\pm$15.7 & 172.0$\pm$11.4 & -0.20$\pm$0.00 & -0.24$\pm$0.02 & 187,16\
` 04565634-0451566` & ` NGC1700 ` & 160328 & 55857.409 & 265 & 2.0 & 3844.7$\pm$13.6 & 243.9$\pm$5.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 04594189-0745185` & ` NGC1726 ` & 142116 & 55597.118 & 185 & 2.0 & 3920.9$\pm$11.8 & 256.3$\pm$6.0 & 0.33$\pm$0.09 & - & 9,1\
` 05025822+2259520` & ` PGC097068 ` & 153677 & 55827.388 & 105 & 2.0 & 16627.5$\pm$69.7 & 158.9$\pm$93.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 05051802-0908500` & ` NGC1779 ` & 153939 & 55835.469 & 130 & 2.0 & 3272.7$\pm$13.8 & 163.6$\pm$10.4 & 0.34$\pm$0.02 & 0.64$\pm$0.13 & 33,2\
` 05063500+0735385` & ` 2M05063 ` & 262025 & 56238.294 & 95 & 1.0 & 12989.1$\pm$14.8 & 250.4$\pm$5.3 & 0.40$\pm$0.48 & - & 16,0\
` 05081967+1721483` & ` PGC1530971 ` & 142810 & 55617.166 & 265 & 2.0 & 5240.1$\pm$22.8 & 236.3$\pm$21.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 05114519+6729174` & ` UGC03252 ` & 262399 & 56251.312 & 35 & 1.0 & 6011.4$\pm$10.8 & 92.7$\pm$7.2 & 0.18$\pm$0.01 & 1.20$\pm$0.04 & 90,11\
` 05122970+5117149` & ` UGC03260 ` & 062217 & 55497.290 & 115 & 2.0 & 6507.1$\pm$13.4 & 201.6$\pm$9.7 & 0.21$\pm$0.06 & 0.03$\pm$0.29 & 22,3\
` 05140614-1037366` & ` NGC1843 ` & 160772 & 55866.388 & 105 & 1.0 & 2554.3$\pm$11.2 & 23.5$\pm$24.6 & - & -0.81$\pm$0.38 & 1,2\
` 05161139-0008596` & ` UGC03271 ` & 261581 & 56221.374 & 200 & 1.0 & 9580.5$\pm$22.5 & 202.2$\pm$24.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 05214155+7219533` & ` PGC017169 ` & 142435 & 55606.140 & 405 & 2.0 & 4908.1$\pm$16.6 & 231.5$\pm$9.8 & - & - & 0,1\
` 05312581+6743497` & ` PGC017387 ` & 262401 & 56251.349 & 430 & 1.0 & 4960.4$\pm$14.3 & 316.8$\pm$7.5 & 0.33$\pm$0.17 & 0.36$\pm$0.32 & 8,2\
` 05374496+2428294` & ` PGC3097142 ` & 262112 & 56240.271 & 30 & 1.0 & 7476.7$\pm$15.1 & 154.3$\pm$15.4 & 0.07$\pm$0.19 & -0.49$\pm$0.36 & 9,2\
` 05414221+0640502` & ` PGC017603 ` & 262085 & 56239.319 & 145 & 1.0 & 490.6$\pm$21.4 & 17.8$\pm$29.8 & -0.82$\pm$0.01 & 0.59$\pm$0.06 & 39,17\
` 05420477+6922421` & ` NGC1961 ` & 153904 & 55833.473 & 452 & 2.0 & 3864.9$\pm$13.0 & 239.6$\pm$7.8 & 0.23$\pm$0.01 & 0.23$\pm$0.06 & 122,8\
` 05420477+6922421` & ` NGC1961 ` & 162045 & 55937.228 & 275 & 2.0 & 3900.0$\pm$16.6 & 220.5$\pm$16.8 & 0.23$\pm$0.01 & 0.21$\pm$0.08 & 87,6\
` 05420477+6922421` & ` NGC1961 ` & 162046 & 55937.243 & 275 & 2.0 & 3885.2$\pm$17.3 & 234.0$\pm$18.3 & 0.21$\pm$0.02 & 0.25$\pm$0.11 & 66,4\
` 05420477+6922421` & ` NGC1961 ` & 162047 & 55937.260 & 275 & 2.0 & 3880.8$\pm$15.8 & 206.9$\pm$13.5 & 0.21$\pm$0.01 & 0.19$\pm$0.09 & 79,5\
` 05430850+6036100` & ` PGC2604391 ` & 341681 & 56335.203 & 260 & 1.0 & 16427.7$\pm$18.8 & 423.6$\pm$17.9 & - & - & 0,1\
` 05454783+5842038` & ` UGC03351 ` & 142811 & 55617.184 & 345 & 2.0 & 4384.5$\pm$20.0 & 178.2$\pm$23.3 & 0.06$\pm$0.02 & 0.08$\pm$0.16 & 97,5\
` 05471117+1733467` & ` PGC213322 ` & 342267 & 56353.177 & 270 & 1.0 & 5522.8$\pm$17.5 & 65.0$\pm$30.2 & -0.36$\pm$0.00 & 0.07$\pm$0.01 & 428,57\
` 05512589-1014438` & ` PGC148081 ` & 262115 & 56240.400 & 240 & 1.0 & 787.1$\pm$51.2 & 102.2$\pm$60.6 & -0.70$\pm$0.10 & 0.43$\pm$0.36 & 9,3\
` 05521140-0727222` & ` NGC2110 ` & 141626 & 55576.215 & 160 & 2.0 & 2292.5$\pm$18.8 & 233.2$\pm$17.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 05572695+1156572` & ` NGC2119 ` & 141014 & 55558.166 & 155 & 2.0 & 3462.0$\pm$14.8 & 249.4$\pm$8.1 & 0.57$\pm$0.15 & - & 5,0\
` 06023793+6522161` & ` UGC03386 ` & 142434 & 55606.107 & 45 & 2.0 & 4522.3$\pm$13.7 & 168.9$\pm$10.9 & 0.39$\pm$0.01 & 1.08$\pm$0.04 & 67,6\
` 06043422+5737401` & ` NGC2128 ` & 060942 & 55451.445 & 65 & 2.0 & 2925.1$\pm$14.3 & 251.3$\pm$8.6 & 0.01$\pm$0.03 & 0.67$\pm$0.18 & 32,2\
` 06043422+5737401` & ` NGC2128 ` & 060943 & 55451.458 & 65 & 2.0 & 2916.1$\pm$12.5 & 236.5$\pm$7.0 & 0.03$\pm$0.02 & 0.45$\pm$0.10 & 33,3\
` 06045758-0635165` & ` 2M06045 ` & 262475 & 56253.386 & 130 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 06084688+3229032` & ` PGC1999078 ` & 142745 & 55616.229 & 260 & 2.0 & 7280.3$\pm$16.1 & 277.6$\pm$14.6 & -0.15$\pm$0.30 & -0.17$\pm$0.72 & 5,2\
` 06153645+7102152` & ` UGC03426 ` & 062421 & 55501.420 & 380 & 2.0 & 3957.5$\pm$16.8 & 253.2$\pm$14.6 & - & - & AGN\
` 06153645+7102152` & ` UGC03426 ` & 062422 & 55501.432 & 380 & 2.0 & 3940.6$\pm$15.4 & 233.7$\pm$12.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 06190264+0309512` & ` PGC086285 ` & 140312 & 55538.407 & 273 & 2.0 & 2820.7$\pm$16.4 & 188.4$\pm$15.2 & -0.11$\pm$0.10 & 0.27$\pm$0.59 & 13,1\
` 06201164+6635058` & ` UGC03438 ` & 161345 & 55890.382 & 280 & 1.0 & 4138.9$\pm$18.5 & 102.4$\pm$26.5 & -0.40$\pm$0.08 & - & 14,1\
` 06205573-0829441` & ` UGCA127 ` & 262090 & 56239.421 & 110 & 1.0 & 690.7$\pm$14.9 & 30.4$\pm$27.5 & -0.34$\pm$0.06 & - & 20,1\
` 06215050+0021581` & ` UGC03457 ` & 140345 & 55539.287 & 230 & 2.0 & 2680.3$\pm$13.1 & 191.2$\pm$8.1 & 0.30$\pm$0.17 & - & 6,0\
` 06222832+6634428` & ` UGC03448 ` & 160962 & 55873.433 & 405 & 1.0 & 4349.9$\pm$12.5 & 176.9$\pm$7.9 & 0.45$\pm$0.22 & - & 6,0\
` 06255550+6444265` & ` UGC03458 ` & 142437 & 55606.234 & 310 & 2.0 & 4132.2$\pm$31.7 & 226.6$\pm$43.2 & -0.03$\pm$0.21 & -0.84$\pm$0.73 & 9,1\
` 06265562+5904483` & ` IC2166 ` & 161242 & 55888.306 & 115 & 1.0 & 2621.0$\pm$13.9 & 68.4$\pm$16.1 & -0.33$\pm$0.07 & -0.22$\pm$0.52 & 18,2\
` 06283061+2132595` & ` PGC019111 ` & 140722 & 55546.226 & 184 & 2.0 & 4409.9$\pm$16.5 & 337.0$\pm$12.0 & 0.07$\pm$0.10 & 0.07$\pm$0.34 & 14,2\
` 06283061+2132595` & ` PGC019111 ` & 161196 & 55887.270 & 200 & 1.0 & 4392.7$\pm$15.6 & 300.6$\pm$10.3 & -0.07$\pm$0.09 & 0.21$\pm$0.41 & 18,2\
` 06325201+4731326` & ` PGC019232 ` & 162539 & 55953.098 & 70 & 2.0 & 10281.7$\pm$14.0 & 331.5$\pm$9.6 & 0.52$\pm$0.52 & - & 3,0\
` 06345941+0653184` & ` PGC019278 ` & 142812 & 55617.209 & 270 & 2.0 & 3486.6$\pm$18.1 & 189.4$\pm$21.5 & -0.87$\pm$0.20 & - & 5,0\
` 06391085-0130277` & ` PGC085930 ` & 160605 & 55864.412 & 95 & 2.0 & 2759.3$\pm$16.4 & 231.8$\pm$12.6 & -0.16$\pm$0.15 & - & 12,1\
` 06454107+7120378` & ` IC0449 ` & 163484 & 55982.142 & 440 & 2.0 & 3837.6$\pm$14.7 & 240.3$\pm$8.4 & - & - & 0,1\
` 06471737+3334021` & ` NGC2274 ` & 140074 & 55533.253 & 97 & 2.0 & 5032.0$\pm$14.3 & 290.3$\pm$6.9 & - & -0.22$\pm$0.23 & 1,3\
` 06471737+3334021` & ` NGC2274 ` & 140527 & 55543.218 & 170 & 2.0 & 4949.4$\pm$15.6 & 284.8$\pm$6.9 & - & -0.53$\pm$0.38 & 1,1\
` 06500866+6050445` & ` NGC2273 ` & 162543 & 55953.292 & 260 & 1.0 & 1812.3$\pm$12.7 & 112.5$\pm$6.6 & -0.07$\pm$0.00 & 0.91$\pm$0.00 & 336,37\
` 06501768-0251397` & ` PGC076120 ` & 161353 & 55892.431 & 240 & 2.0 & 2548.0$\pm$20.7 & 285.0$\pm$18.4 & -0.10$\pm$0.10 & 0.08$\pm$0.28 & 22,2\
` 06515795+1617407` & ` PGC019750 ` & 161416 & 55894.291 & 195 & 1.0 & 2582.3$\pm$12.3 & 123.3$\pm$6.8 & - & - & 0,0\
` 06552767+3316495` & ` PGC019864 ` & 142563 & 55610.273 & 305 & 2.0 & 5175.3$\pm$13.0 & 269.9$\pm$6.7 & 0.17$\pm$0.07 & 0.30$\pm$0.13 & 16,4\
` 06553570+3945526` & ` UGC03596 ` & 262570 & 56255.279 & 130 & 1.0 & 5146.2$\pm$14.0 & 168.7$\pm$6.2 & 0.59$\pm$0.18 & - & 5,0\
` 06584610+5946393` & ` PGC3096769 ` & 260949 & 56201.456 & -25 & 1.0 & 20467.2$\pm$189.1 & 922.5$\pm$132.7 & - & - & AGN\
` 07033226+0117074` & ` PGC076449 ` & 262114 & 56240.383 & 160 & 1.0 & 9276.4$\pm$12.9 & 197.3$\pm$7.6 & -0.45$\pm$0.33 & -0.23$\pm$0.38 & 2,2\
` 07054202+5034519` & ` NGC2320 ` & 062056 & 55491.383 & 140 & 2.0 & 5738.4$\pm$16.1 & 324.3$\pm$11.3 & 0.27$\pm$0.04 & 0.53$\pm$0.12 & 29,4\
` 07081396+4606569` & ` UGC03683 ` & 140344 & 55539.268 & 50 & 2.0 & 5812.0$\pm$15.1 & 280.2$\pm$7.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 07090595+6135438` & ` UGC03685 ` & 161509 & 55896.305 & 135 & 1.0 & 1759.0$\pm$12.9 & 42.1$\pm$19.2 & -0.04$\pm$0.00 & 1.11$\pm$0.00 & 176,21\
` 07111080+5010288` & ` NGC2340 ` & 341480 & 56329.087 & 85 & 1.0 & 5836.6$\pm$12.9 & 243.9$\pm$6.0 & 0.11$\pm$0.12 & - & 9,1\
` 07114179+4952003` & ` UGC03725 ` & 142746 & 55616.285 & 288 & 2.0 & 6043.1$\pm$13.2 & 285.3$\pm$10.9 & 0.54$\pm$0.13 & - & 7,0\
` 07122870+4710004` & ` NGC2344 ` & 144394 & 55660.150 & 325 & 1.0 & 922.8$\pm$15.2 & 55.1$\pm$16.9 & 0.05$\pm$0.25 & -0.07$\pm$0.35 & 4,3\
` 07122870+4710004` & ` NGC2344 ` & 144395 & 55660.162 & 325 & 1.0 & 919.3$\pm$13.7 & 48.8$\pm$16.6 & -0.30$\pm$0.36 & -0.81$\pm$0.50 & 1,2\
` 07140387+3516455` & ` UGC03752 ` & 260948 & 56201.436 & 75 & 1.0 & 4594.4$\pm$15.0 & 88.6$\pm$8.1 & -0.16$\pm$0.00 & 0.78$\pm$0.00 & 140,32\
` 07141510+4541557` & ` MRK0376 ` & 160771 & 55866.358 & 170 & 2.0 & 16315.5$\pm$38.7 & 250.8$\pm$42.7 & - & - & AGN\
` 07164122+5323091` & ` PGC020561 ` & 262087 & 56239.359 & 135 & 1.0 & 18515.1$\pm$17.0 & 309.7$\pm$13.2 & - & - & 0,1\
` 07180060+4405271` & ` PGC020607 ` & 262571 & 56255.301 & 20 & 1.0 & 18445.1$\pm$170.1 & 92.0$\pm$187.0 & - & - & AGN\
` 07193089+5921184` & ` UGC03789 ` & 162711 & 55958.169 & -20 & 1.0 & 3184.5$\pm$9.6 & 127.5$\pm$6.7 & -0.07$\pm$0.00 & 1.10$\pm$0.01 & 369,55\
` 07202668+5623271` & ` UGC03800 ` & 161349 & 55892.316 & 30 & 2.0 & 13218.2$\pm$12.9 & 234.3$\pm$9.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 07221089-0555472` & ` PGC020827 ` & 140787 & 55548.348 & 100 & 2.0 & 1547.6$\pm$13.9 & 133.7$\pm$14.0 & 0.42$\pm$0.02 & - & 34,0\
` 07225814-0357344` & ` PGC077133 ` & 262408 & 56251.445 & 225 & 1.0 & 19893.0$\pm$14.0 & 138.1$\pm$17.0 & -0.09$\pm$0.32 & 0.15$\pm$0.88 & 7,2\
` 07231243+5803532` & ` UGC03816 ` & 061549 & 55478.445 & 52 & 2.0 & 3274.9$\pm$14.0 & 297.5$\pm$6.1 & 0.27$\pm$0.05 & 0.41$\pm$0.17 & 19,3\
` 07231243+5803532` & ` UGC03816 ` & 061550 & 55478.456 & 52 & 2.0 & 3249.7$\pm$13.8 & 299.3$\pm$5.8 & 0.32$\pm$0.05 & 0.61$\pm$0.17 & 16,2\
` 07231243+5803532` & ` UGC03816 ` & 061589 & 55479.424 & 52 & 2.0 & 3280.5$\pm$13.0 & 305.7$\pm$5.9 & 0.31$\pm$0.09 & 0.58$\pm$0.36 & 12,2\
` 07231243+5803532` & ` UGC03816 ` & 061590 & 55479.436 & 52 & 2.0 & 3279.3$\pm$13.2 & 307.5$\pm$5.5 & 0.29$\pm$0.07 & 0.58$\pm$0.31 & 12,2\
` 07243578+5758029` & ` UGC03828 ` & 262400 & 56251.330 & -20 & 1.0 & 3449.2$\pm$12.4 & 78.6$\pm$10.7 & -0.32$\pm$0.00 & -0.27$\pm$0.03 & 147,16\
` 07252090+1910387` & ` UGC03840 ` & 142587 & 55611.280 & 310 & 2.0 & 8313.0$\pm$14.0 & 298.2$\pm$8.1 & -0.73$\pm$0.29 & - & 2,0\
` 07281299+5830242` & ` UGC03855 ` & 161417 & 55894.307 & 55 & 1.0 & 3110.8$\pm$13.3 & 143.6$\pm$5.6 & 0.15$\pm$0.11 & - & 13,0\
` 07285341+3349084` & ` NGC2388 ` & 142564 & 55610.289 & 240 & 2.0 & 4028.8$\pm$21.6 & 55.9$\pm$42.3 & -0.22$\pm$0.00 & -0.52$\pm$0.06 & 231,6\
` 07312264+1854217` & ` PGC021204 ` & 162541 & 55953.146 & 130 & 2.0 & 8128.0$\pm$14.5 & 222.8$\pm$9.4 & 0.36$\pm$0.18 & - & 8,0\
` 07330464+6504446` & ` UGC03894 ` & 142486 & 55608.228 & 380 & 2.0 & 6628.7$\pm$13.5 & 302.0$\pm$7.0 & 0.16$\pm$0.13 & 0.39$\pm$0.45 & 8,2\
` 07330464+6504446` & ` UGC03894 ` & 142586 & 55611.226 & 380 & 2.0 & 6644.2$\pm$13.8 & 308.9$\pm$8.1 & 0.18$\pm$0.16 & -0.43$\pm$0.29 & 6,2\
` 07343635+1816534` & ` NGC2411 ` & 142411 & 55605.307 & 230 & 2.0 & 4959.3$\pm$13.5 & 276.5$\pm$6.9 & 0.47$\pm$0.11 & - & 7,0\
` 07363752+1753023` & ` NGC2418 ` & 262572 & 56255.319 & 65 & 1.0 & 4995.0$\pm$13.5 & 254.5$\pm$4.9 & 0.43$\pm$0.07 & - & 15,1\
` 07365707+5846134` & ` PGC021400 ` & 140667 & 55545.298 & 35 & 2.0 & 11733.0$\pm$18.1 & 91.7$\pm$44.9 & - & - & AGN\
` 07405822+5525379` & ` UGC03957 ` & 142543 & 55609.290 & 280 & 2.0 & 9985.6$\pm$17.2 & 304.8$\pm$12.1 & -0.21$\pm$0.59 & -0.33$\pm$1.07 & 2,1\
` 07424170+6510378` & ` MRK0078 ` & 161981 & 55933.274 & 80 & 1.0 & 10881.2$\pm$25.4 & 96.4$\pm$40.4 & - & - & AGN\
` 07435033+4936515` & ` IC0472 ` & 262192 & 56243.362 & 25 & 1.0 & 5578.4$\pm$11.5 & 140.8$\pm$6.4 & 0.39$\pm$0.08 & 0.59$\pm$0.27 & 19,3\
` 07441362+3139045` & ` NGC2435 ` & 140374 & 55539.512 & 215 & 2.0 & 4121.7$\pm$14.0 & 192.1$\pm$8.4 & 0.27$\pm$0.05 & 0.61$\pm$0.30 & 19,2\
` 07511761+5010459` & ` UGC04051 ` & 162759 & 55959.144 & 10 & 2.0 & 6178.5$\pm$13.8 & 300.5$\pm$7.3 & 0.05$\pm$0.18 & - & 5,0\
` 07570191+4934021` & ` UGC04107 ` & 340520 & 56282.472 & 295 & 1.0 & 3440.7$\pm$16.3 & 64.7$\pm$22.4 & -0.45$\pm$0.02 & -0.65$\pm$0.11 & 70,5\
` 07594014+1523122` & ` UGC04145 ` & 142577 & 55611.111 & 130 & 2.0 & 4546.3$\pm$14.6 & 164.6$\pm$12.9 & 0.15$\pm$0.00 & 0.95$\pm$0.02 & 125,13\
` 08002366+3949494` & ` NGC2493 ` & 140723 & 55546.279 & 30 & 2.0 & 3889.6$\pm$13.8 & 225.8$\pm$8.4 & 0.33$\pm$0.05 & 0.60$\pm$0.15 & 18,3\
` 08014590+5633120` & ` NGC2488 ` & 142588 & 55611.297 & 275 & 2.0 & 8488.1$\pm$14.9 & 290.1$\pm$8.6 & 0.38$\pm$0.23 & 1.04$\pm$0.81 & 4,1\
` 08015724+0833064` & ` NGC2508 ` & 160986 & 55876.398 & 130 & 2.0 & 4224.9$\pm$24.6 & 310.2$\pm$29.7 & -0.13$\pm$0.20 & -0.86$\pm$0.46 & 4,1\
` 08015724+0833064` & ` NGC2508 ` & 162712 & 55958.184 & 130 & 2.0 & 4284.6$\pm$12.6 & 263.7$\pm$5.9 & 0.49$\pm$0.05 & 0.80$\pm$0.18 & 15,2\
` 08022465+0924489` & ` NGC2513 ` & 141016 & 55558.272 & 170 & 2.0 & 4619.5$\pm$14.4 & 297.0$\pm$6.5 & - & - & 1,0\
` 08040584+0506498` & ` UGC04203 ` & 341484 & 56329.314 & 325 & 1.0 & 3976.1$\pm$15.4 & 74.5$\pm$22.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 08053779-0058174` & ` PGC022720 ` & 261705 & 56225.480 & 156 & 1.0 & 25649.9$\pm$14.2 & 418.6$\pm$17.5 & - & - & -\
` 08061345+1742231` & ` NGC2522 ` & 142439 & 55606.329 & 215 & 2.0 & 4648.1$\pm$15.9 & 289.1$\pm$10.8 & 0.21$\pm$0.07 & - & 13,1\
` 08071471+0428106` & ` PGC022798 ` & 162511 & 55951.353 & 230 & 2.0 & 9152.8$\pm$14.9 & 198.5$\pm$8.4 & - & - & 0,1\
` 08095257+5754458` & ` PGC022906 ` & 142545 & 55609.324 & 365 & 2.0 & 7741.8$\pm$18.0 & 280.5$\pm$13.4 & 0.23$\pm$0.08 & 0.36$\pm$0.21 & 13,3\
` 08102329+4216262` & ` PGC2195631 ` & 161350 & 55892.336 & 110 & 2.0 & 18422.0$\pm$16.4 & 363.4$\pm$12.7 & - & - & 0,1\
` 08102329+4216262` & ` PGC2195631 ` & 161418 & 55894.325 & 110 & 2.0 & 18438.5$\pm$16.2 & 318.6$\pm$16.0 & - & -0.42$\pm$0.45 & 1,2\
` 08110158+0505143` & ` IC2231 ` & 142640 & 55613.278 & 300 & 2.0 & 8876.0$\pm$15.0 & 267.6$\pm$8.8 & 0.43$\pm$0.29 & 0.02$\pm$0.45 & 2,3\
` 08131464+4559232` & ` NGC2537 ` & 261746 & 56229.407 & 165 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 08144007+4903411` & ` NGC2541 ` & 261485 & 56219.448 & -5 & 1.0 & 526.6$\pm$21.3 & 71.1$\pm$31.0 & -0.54$\pm$0.05 & 0.00$\pm$0.14 & 16,8\
` 08154484+5819159` & ` UGC04289 ` & 341481 & 56329.178 & 95 & 1.0 & 7983.9$\pm$14.1 & 239.8$\pm$6.3 & 0.46$\pm$0.12 & - & 10,0\
` 08172577+2141080` & ` UGC04308 ` & 262402 & 56251.365 & 100 & 1.0 & 3518.3$\pm$12.2 & 77.9$\pm$16.6 & -0.41$\pm$0.01 & -0.53$\pm$0.06 & 113,8\
` 08173676+3526455` & ` UGC04306 ` & 161151 & 55884.357 & 135 & 1.0 & 2321.9$\pm$15.4 & 49.4$\pm$26.7 & -0.38$\pm$0.01 & -0.24$\pm$0.06 & 127,8\
` 08175347+2328195` & ` NGC2554 ` & 163598 & 55984.090 & 160 & 1.0 & 4045.4$\pm$12.2 & 188.0$\pm$4.5 & 0.28$\pm$0.02 & 0.87$\pm$0.27 & 39,2\
` 08185834+5748111` & ` NGC2549 ` & 261725 & 56228.435 & 1 & 1.0 & 1022.8$\pm$13.5 & 147.5$\pm$3.8 & 0.01$\pm$0.14 & - & 3,0\
` 08194833+2201531` & ` NGC2565 ` & 160960 & 55873.398 & 175 & 1.0 & 3523.5$\pm$11.3 & 156.2$\pm$6.1 & 0.26$\pm$0.08 & - & 16,0\
` 08202368+2107533` & ` NGC2562 ` & 142589 & 55611.314 & 181 & 2.0 & 4996.0$\pm$13.8 & 176.9$\pm$10.0 & 1.19$\pm$1.18 & - & 2,1\
` 08203567+2104042` & ` NGC2563 ` & 140734 & 55546.502 & 250 & 2.0 & 4441.0$\pm$13.5 & 286.9$\pm$6.0 & - & - & 0,3\
` 08223994+5619455` & ` UGC04357 ` & 161419 & 55894.343 & 90 & 1.0 & 8433.5$\pm$13.0 & 147.3$\pm$7.4 & -0.21$\pm$0.02 & -0.25$\pm$0.13 & 48,4\
` 08224347+2233109` & ` NGC2577 ` & 261445 & 56218.440 & 105 & 1.0 & 2003.6$\pm$12.7 & 215.9$\pm$5.8 & 0.14$\pm$0.14 & - & 11,1\
` 08262485+5953433` & ` PGC023680 ` & 161352 & 55892.373 & 90 & 2.0 & 7856.6$\pm$14.3 & 301.4$\pm$15.7 & 0.16$\pm$0.06 & 0.42$\pm$0.30 & 19,2\
` 08270808+2558132` & ` NGC2592 ` & 261410 & 56217.447 & 55 & 1.0 & 1944.6$\pm$12.0 & 232.6$\pm$4.5 & -0.28$\pm$0.21 & -0.49$\pm$0.18 & 4,3\
` 08270808+2558132` & ` NGC2592 ` & 340877 & 56305.200 & 55 & 1.0 & 1941.2$\pm$14.1 & 240.0$\pm$4.6 & 0.10$\pm$0.18 & 0.15$\pm$0.51 & 7,1\
` 08284712-0656246` & ` MRK1216 ` & 142410 & 55605.243 & 250 & 2.0 & 6331.8$\pm$15.6 & 343.1$\pm$9.2 & 0.27$\pm$0.06 & 0.11$\pm$0.21 & 17,3\
` 08284712-0656246` & ` MRK1216 ` & 161426 & 55894.454 & 160 & 1.0 & 6363.0$\pm$12.0 & 356.2$\pm$7.4 & 0.24$\pm$0.05 & 0.20$\pm$0.19 & 27,3\
` 08284712-0656246` & ` MRK1216 ` & 161511 & 55896.450 & 250 & 1.0 & 6373.0$\pm$13.7 & 341.3$\pm$10.1 & 0.25$\pm$0.06 & 0.68$\pm$0.57 & 22,1\
` 08355356+0042259` & ` NGC2618 ` & 163418 & 55980.173 & 145 & 1.0 & 3983.4$\pm$12.5 & 148.8$\pm$7.6 & - & - & 3,0\
` 08424792+7258352` & ` NGC2614 ` & 262410 & 56251.482 & 330 & 1.0 & 3394.8$\pm$13.5 & 58.3$\pm$23.3 & 0.29$\pm$0.57 & - & 4,0\
` 08433809+5012199` & ` NGC2639 ` & 163599 & 55984.109 & 123 & 1.0 & 3121.5$\pm$12.9 & 188.6$\pm$5.3 & 0.48$\pm$0.01 & 0.83$\pm$0.05 & 81,5\
` 08442146+5850307` & ` UGC04549 ` & 341683 & 56335.346 & 330 & 1.0 & 1262.8$\pm$15.9 & 16.0$\pm$26.9 & -0.36$\pm$0.05 & -0.21$\pm$0.18 & 25,5\
` 08471585+7259082` & ` NGC2629 ` & 141416 & 55570.368 & 455 & 2.0 & 3584.3$\pm$12.4 & 298.6$\pm$6.5 & 0.28$\pm$0.02 & 0.48$\pm$0.07 & 46,7\
` 08492189+1904298` & ` NGC2672 ` & 140309 & 55538.343 & 120 & 2.0 & 4290.0$\pm$14.6 & 283.0$\pm$5.7 & - & 0.03$\pm$0.50 & 1,3\
` 08524134+3325184` & ` NGC2683 ` & 160961 & 55873.415 & 97 & 1.0 & 372.5$\pm$14.7 & 108.3$\pm$17.8 & 0.16$\pm$0.05 & 0.46$\pm$0.17 & 24,3\
` 08533273+5118493` & ` NGC2681 ` & 262089 & 56239.402 & 70 & 1.0 & 641.6$\pm$12.8 & 103.3$\pm$5.7 & 0.67$\pm$0.02 & - & 15,0\
` 08542706-0304015` & ` NGC2695 ` & 161510 & 55896.428 & 170 & 1.0 & 1784.8$\pm$13.3 & 222.8$\pm$3.6 & - & - & 0,0\
` 08565924+5120504` & ` NGC2693 ` & 140492 & 55542.321 & 160 & 2.0 & 4821.6$\pm$13.5 & 331.4$\pm$5.8 & -0.07$\pm$0.09 & -0.27$\pm$0.16 & 9,3\
` 08572051+0255171` & ` NGC2713 ` & 140318 & 55538.505 & 295 & 2.0 & 3869.5$\pm$13.5 & 235.9$\pm$6.1 & 0.40$\pm$0.05 & 0.89$\pm$0.27 & 18,2\
` 08590808+1108566` & ` NGC2720 ` & 142641 & 55613.324 & 205 & 2.0 & 8709.1$\pm$15.1 & 324.3$\pm$9.2 & 0.22$\pm$0.46 & - & 2,0\
` 09015837+6009062` & ` UGC04730 ` & 162713 & 55958.243 & 95 & 1.0 & 3292.4$\pm$13.3 & 101.9$\pm$9.5 & -0.43$\pm$0.00 & 0.35$\pm$0.01 & 167,43\
` 09052131+1818472` & ` NGC2749 ` & 142184 & 55598.379 & 245 & 2.0 & 4140.4$\pm$14.1 & 268.0$\pm$7.4 & 0.26$\pm$0.02 & 0.58$\pm$0.11 & 32,4\
` 09073352+6028454` & ` NGC2816 ` & 162219 & 55943.406 & 265 & 1.0 & 1238.4$\pm$14.2 & 69.9$\pm$16.4 & -0.38$\pm$0.00 & -0.34$\pm$0.00 & 37,3\
` 09083728+3737174` & ` NGC2759 ` & 142642 & 55613.356 & 230 & 2.0 & 6855.6$\pm$15.0 & 283.3$\pm$7.6 & 0.08$\pm$0.10 & - & 8,1\
` 09085837-0935587` & ` PGC025752 ` & 341352 & 56323.290 & 173 & 1.0 & 14994.1$\pm$19.1 & 317.8$\pm$14.7 & - & - & 0,1\
` 09101187+5024048` & ` NGC2767 ` & 142414 & 55605.393 & 355 & 2.0 & 4870.3$\pm$14.7 & 244.5$\pm$7.6 & 0.45$\pm$0.10 & 1.44$\pm$0.77 & 7,1\
` 09101187+5024048` & ` NGC2767 ` & 251846 & 56064.138 & 355 & 1.0 & 4879.5$\pm$13.1 & 248.5$\pm$5.8 & 0.40$\pm$0.14 & - & 8,1\
` 09101187+5024048` & ` NGC2767 ` & 261584 & 56221.466 & -5 & 1.0 & 4875.4$\pm$12.8 & 248.1$\pm$4.9 & 0.40$\pm$0.12 & - & 7,0\
` 09102011+0702165` & ` NGC2775 ` & 161215 & 55887.422 & 160 & 1.0 & 1316.4$\pm$13.4 & 166.1$\pm$4.0 & -0.05$\pm$0.23 & - & 3,0\
` 09113750+6002139` & ` NGC2768 ` & 261748 & 56229.468 & 93 & 1.0 & 1318.0$\pm$13.0 & 172.8$\pm$4.0 & 0.17$\pm$0.02 & 0.43$\pm$0.08 & 40,5\
` 09122439+3501387` & ` NGC2778 ` & 340804 & 56294.493 & 230 & 1.0 & 1979.6$\pm$15.8 & 159.1$\pm$5.9 & 0.05$\pm$0.16 & 0.88$\pm$0.43 & 8,1\
` 09133949+2959340` & ` NGC2783 ` & 142639 & 55612.377 & 170 & 2.0 & 6674.9$\pm$16.3 & 241.7$\pm$10.4 & 0.27$\pm$0.04 & 0.25$\pm$0.14 & 20,6\
` 09145961+2943492` & ` NGC2789 ` & 142413 & 55605.375 & 220 & 2.0 & 6265.2$\pm$14.0 & 183.0$\pm$11.6 & -0.19$\pm$0.01 & -0.13$\pm$0.06 & 107,10\
` 09164777+4946491` & ` PGC026193 ` & 341439 & 56327.416 & 255 & 1.0 & 8424.3$\pm$12.9 & 305.4$\pm$6.8 & 0.15$\pm$0.31 & 0.27$\pm$0.86 & 4,3\
` 09165350+1727271` & ` PGC026204 ` & 140493 & 55542.342 & 183 & 2.0 & 8398.3$\pm$13.7 & 237.3$\pm$8.9 & -1.18$\pm$0.59 & -1.15$\pm$0.34 & 1,2\
` 09180931+1611526` & ` NGC2819 ` & 141420 & 55570.456 & 225 & 2.0 & 8813.7$\pm$14.5 & 312.4$\pm$7.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 09182597+1618196` & ` PGC026292 ` & 140310 & 55538.363 & 65 & 2.0 & 8581.9$\pm$22.2 & 282.6$\pm$20.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 09191853+6912122` & ` NGC2787 ` & 140373 & 55539.473 & 300 & 2.0 & 627.3$\pm$13.2 & 205.0$\pm$6.3 & 0.19$\pm$0.02 & 0.53$\pm$0.08 & 30,4\
` 09194687+3344594` & ` NGC2832 ` & 140121 & 55534.354 & 165 & 2.0 & 6740.6$\pm$13.3 & 340.4$\pm$7.1 & 0.40$\pm$0.16 & 0.41$\pm$0.51 & 5,2\
` 09220265+5058353` & ` NGC2841 ` & 144503 & 55670.216 & 290 & 2.0 & 599.5$\pm$13.1 & 230.1$\pm$8.3 & 0.25$\pm$0.01 & 0.42$\pm$0.04 & 43,7\
` 09234300+2254324` & ` PGC026614 ` & 251034 & 56024.242 & 335 & 1.0 & 9757.3$\pm$53.4 & 96.6$\pm$84.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 09234300+2254324` & ` PGC026614 ` & 261446 & 56218.493 & 165 & 1.0 & 9671.8$\pm$24.4 & 148.3$\pm$29.0 & - & - & AGN\
` 09241854+3430481` & ` NGC2859 ` & 261806 & 56231.455 & 157 & 1.0 & 1627.1$\pm$14.1 & 172.8$\pm$3.5 & 0.33$\pm$0.06 & - & 16,1\
` 09251217-0649476` & ` IC2471 ` & 142488 & 55608.274 & 145 & 2.0 & 6105.7$\pm$14.4 & 181.2$\pm$10.2 & - & - & 0,1\
` 09254253+1125557` & ` NGC2872 ` & 140122 & 55534.384 & 45 & 2.0 & 3207.1$\pm$13.8 & 293.3$\pm$5.8 & 0.39$\pm$0.19 & 0.07$\pm$0.33 & 4,4\
` 09260324+1244041` & ` UGC05025 ` & 163186 & 55976.180 & 80 & 2.0 & 8472.3$\pm$22.2 & 197.5$\pm$30.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 09301694+2932239` & ` NGC2893 ` & 342011 & 56342.158 & 165 & 1.0 & 1663.4$\pm$13.8 & 41.5$\pm$16.7 & -0.21$\pm$0.00 & -0.13$\pm$0.00 & 196,16\
` 09321011+2130029` & ` NGC2903 ` & 160963 & 55873.451 & 102 & 1.0 & 506.0$\pm$12.8 & 75.2$\pm$8.4 & -0.39$\pm$0.00 & -0.44$\pm$0.02 & 181,11\
` 09325289+6737026` & ` NGC2892 ` & 142438 & 55606.312 & 361 & 2.0 & 6732.8$\pm$16.2 & 272.6$\pm$9.1 & 0.68$\pm$0.16 & 0.16$\pm$0.29 & 5,3\
` 09380516+0936598` & ` NGC2940 ` & 141456 & 55571.454 & 295 & 2.0 & 8417.3$\pm$12.9 & 218.6$\pm$7.9 & - & 0.09$\pm$0.87 & 0,2\
` 09380516+0936598` & ` NGC2940 ` & 141457 & 55571.465 & 295 & 2.0 & 8417.5$\pm$14.6 & 200.4$\pm$9.4 & -0.16$\pm$0.37 & -0.36$\pm$0.37 & 2,2\
` 09383289+1701527` & ` NGC2943 ` & 142688 & 55615.359 & 305 & 2.0 & 8239.7$\pm$15.2 & 259.2$\pm$8.4 & 0.53$\pm$0.17 & - & 5,0\
` 09403637+0334369` & ` NGC2960 ` & 162714 & 55958.269 & 210 & 1.0 & 4870.3$\pm$12.1 & 155.2$\pm$4.2 & 0.48$\pm$0.01 & 1.07$\pm$0.04 & 60,10\
` 09420333+0020113` & ` NGC2967 ` & 144555 & 55673.167 & 135 & 2.0 & 1862.4$\pm$13.1 & 77.9$\pm$27.4 & -0.26$\pm$0.08 & 0.37$\pm$0.59 & 12,1\
` 09420333+0020113` & ` NGC2967 ` & 144556 & 55673.181 & 135 & 2.0 & 1851.9$\pm$15.7 & 93.3$\pm$24.0 & -0.40$\pm$0.06 & 0.07$\pm$0.30 & 12,3\
` 09423511+5851043` & ` NGC2950 ` & 262031 & 56238.459 & 135 & 1.0 & 1275.6$\pm$14.3 & 168.9$\pm$3.7 & 0.55$\pm$0.11 & - & 4,0\
` 09425425+3150499` & ` NGC2964 ` & 343049 & 56378.279 & 270 & 1.0 & 1283.6$\pm$14.7 & 82.3$\pm$14.4 & -0.30$\pm$0.00 & -0.24$\pm$0.02 & 183,18\
` 09430865-1022596` & ` NGC2979 ` & 162301 & 55946.353 & 205 & 1.0 & 2641.1$\pm$13.3 & 92.3$\pm$11.4 & 0.24$\pm$0.03 & 0.95$\pm$0.10 & 60,5\
` 09431201+3155438` & ` NGC2968 ` & 161346 & 55890.412 & 40 & 1.0 & 1524.9$\pm$42.1 & 221.5$\pm$65.8 & - & - & 0,1\
` 09483604+3325173` & ` NGC3003 ` & 340609 & 56285.319 & 79 & 1.0 & 1491.8$\pm$17.2 & 99.6$\pm$19.1 & -0.56$\pm$0.00 & -0.03$\pm$0.00 & 105,31\
` 09505711+3333124` & ` NGC3021 ` & 262186 & 56242.447 & 105 & 1.0 & 1603.1$\pm$18.1 & 68.3$\pm$31.3 & -0.42$\pm$0.01 & -0.27$\pm$0.11 & 68,6\
` 09530714+1640396` & ` NGC3041 ` & 163187 & 55976.197 & 100 & 1.0 & 1378.0$\pm$13.9 & 50.3$\pm$16.7 & -0.12$\pm$0.00 & 0.44$\pm$0.00 & 14,1\
` 09534088+0134467` & ` NGC3044 ` & 342469 & 56360.309 & 304 & 1.0 & 1218.2$\pm$15.0 & 28.1$\pm$28.0 & -0.49$\pm$0.01 & 0.01$\pm$0.02 & 178,60\
` 09542701-0657122` & ` IC0574 ` & 341578 & 56331.329 & 185 & 1.0 & 6047.1$\pm$15.1 & 354.6$\pm$10.3 & -0.15$\pm$0.39 & - & 6,2\
` 09544965+0916179` & ` NGC3049 ` & 340610 & 56285.351 & 215 & 1.0 & 1344.8$\pm$27.3 & 97.3$\pm$41.4 & 0.18$\pm$0.01 & -0.46$\pm$0.00 & 427,104\
` 09551804+0416122` & ` NGC3055 ` & 262215 & 56245.479 & 60 & 1.0 & 1779.7$\pm$13.3 & 32.7$\pm$18.3 & -0.17$\pm$0.00 & -0.03$\pm$0.01 & 477,98\
` 09555243+6940469` & ` NGC3034 ` & 144552 & 55673.121 & 360 & 1.0 & 179.9$\pm$15.1 & 93.1$\pm$12.5 & -0.07$\pm$0.00 & -0.37$\pm$0.01 & 1113,42\
` 09562016+2713393` & ` IC2520 ` & 162225 & 55943.492 & 185 & 1.0 & 1200.8$\pm$15.1 & 44.5$\pm$21.0 & -0.41$\pm$0.01 & 0.06$\pm$0.03 & 117,26\
` 09580691+1021353` & ` NGC3070 ` & 262594 & 56256.426 & 215 & 1.0 & 5329.7$\pm$11.6 & 224.0$\pm$4.9 & -0.11$\pm$0.41 & - & 1,0\
` 09582105+3222119` & ` NGC3067 ` & 163609 & 55984.385 & 285 & 1.0 & 1435.6$\pm$14.2 & 71.2$\pm$16.6 & -0.43$\pm$0.00 & -0.40$\pm$0.00 & 145,9\
` 10015792+5540480` & ` NGC3079 ` & 163698 & 55987.357 & 359 & 1.0 & 1107.7$\pm$14.6 & 160.6$\pm$10.8 & 0.37$\pm$0.03 & 0.65$\pm$0.18 & 54,3\
` 10031907+6844022` & ` NGC3077 ` & 161627 & 55916.452 & 425 & 1.0 & -43.5$\pm$13.8 & 43.5$\pm$17.9 & -0.63$\pm$0.00 & 0.03$\pm$0.00 & 232,133\
` 10035880+2216334` & ` UGC05420 ` & 051118 & 55327.166 & 243 & 2.0 & 6055.8$\pm$12.2 & 265.4$\pm$7.2 & - & - & 2,0\
` 10035880+2216334` & ` UGC05420 ` & 051119 & 55327.177 & 243 & 2.0 & 6057.8$\pm$13.6 & 266.5$\pm$7.0 & 0.67$\pm$0.30 & - & 3,0\
` 10051397-0743068` & ` NGC3115 ` & 250604 & 56012.187 & 90 & 1.0 & 637.5$\pm$12.9 & 286.2$\pm$2.4 & -0.13$\pm$0.10 & -0.25$\pm$0.16 & 4,3\
` 10054161-0758532` & ` PGC029300 ` & 340519 & 56282.450 & 225 & 1.0 & 680.6$\pm$14.1 & 43.2$\pm$21.2 & - & - & 0,0\
` 10055999+5848443` & ` UGC05435 ` & 351384 & 56430.135 & 400 & 1.0 & 2799.0$\pm$14.3 & 220.0$\pm$4.0 & - & - & 0,1\
` 10133157+2244152` & ` NGC3162 ` & 262116 & 56240.469 & 165 & 1.0 & 1250.6$\pm$11.9 & 41.3$\pm$18.4 & -0.43$\pm$0.00 & -0.40$\pm$0.00 & 91,10\
` 10133829-0055319` & ` UGC05515 ` & 142964 & 55619.247 & 110 & 2.0 & 12989.6$\pm$16.2 & 329.4$\pm$11.1 & - & - & 1,0\
` 10134567+0325288` & ` NGC3166 ` & 163603 & 55984.213 & 84 & 1.0 & 1302.0$\pm$14.1 & 147.3$\pm$4.1 & 0.44$\pm$0.02 & - & 31,1\
` 10135049+3845536` & ` NGC3158 ` & 140091 & 55533.408 & 183 & 2.0 & 6774.0$\pm$12.6 & 289.7$\pm$6.2 & -0.06$\pm$0.19 & -0.06$\pm$0.44 & 4,2\
` 10141509+0327580` & ` NGC3169 ` & 340522 & 56282.522 & 232 & 1.0 & 1212.9$\pm$12.2 & 163.6$\pm$4.9 & 0.24$\pm$0.02 & 0.75$\pm$0.12 & 44,3\
` 10163416+2107223` & ` NGC3177 ` & 342013 & 56342.197 & 125 & 1.0 & 1275.5$\pm$11.1 & 121.2$\pm$13.0 & -0.20$\pm$0.00 & -0.29$\pm$0.00 & 80,6\
` 10165363+7324023` & ` NGC3147 ` & 142491 & 55608.303 & 325 & 2.0 & 2780.2$\pm$13.5 & 233.1$\pm$8.0 & 0.42$\pm$0.03 & 0.87$\pm$0.09 & 40,3\
` 10180564+2149549` & ` NGC3190 ` & 140811 & 55549.368 & 118 & 2.0 & 1188.4$\pm$13.9 & 163.6$\pm$10.1 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & 0.71$\pm$0.19 & 23,2\
` 10182488+2153383` & ` NGC3193 ` & 262140 & 56241.461 & 200 & 1.0 & 1342.7$\pm$12.7 & 208.1$\pm$3.5 & -0.02$\pm$0.09 & - & 8,0\
` 10203840+2530177` & ` NGC3209 ` & 144235 & 55656.281 & 265 & 2.0 & 6122.2$\pm$14.0 & 308.9$\pm$8.2 & 0.05$\pm$0.40 & - & 4,1\
` 10211787+2755484` & ` IC2565 ` & 342012 & 56342.177 & 190 & 1.0 & 14589.6$\pm$16.3 & 249.3$\pm$7.8 & - & - & 0,1\
` 10232701+1953543` & ` NGC3226 ` & 262214 & 56245.459 & 205 & 1.0 & 1260.7$\pm$12.4 & 202.6$\pm$4.4 & 0.15$\pm$0.02 & 0.54$\pm$0.05 & 60,7\
` 10233060+1951538` & ` NGC3227 ` & 162548 & 55953.469 & 305 & 1.0 & 1107.7$\pm$15.8 & 141.8$\pm$11.0 & - & - & AGN\
` 10262836+2013417` & ` IC0610 ` & 350990 & 56418.203 & 210 & 1.0 & 1127.8$\pm$16.3 & 81.3$\pm$27.8 & -0.44$\pm$0.00 & -0.49$\pm$0.00 & 44,2\
` 10271019-0319082` & ` PGC030732 ` & 142440 & 55606.352 & 115 & 2.0 & 8957.6$\pm$14.8 & 207.0$\pm$12.1 & - & - & 1,0\
` 10271836+2830267` & ` NGC3245 ` & 160964 & 55873.475 & 175 & 1.0 & 1276.0$\pm$14.0 & 205.7$\pm$4.2 & 0.01$\pm$0.05 & 0.37$\pm$0.21 & 30,3\
` 10291992+2929291` & ` NGC3254 ` & 351489 & 56433.169 & 243 & 1.0 & 1318.0$\pm$12.5 & 105.3$\pm$6.0 & 0.06$\pm$0.00 & 1.07$\pm$0.00 & 38,3\
` 10301064-0309488` & ` PGC030960 ` & 140207 & 55536.489 & 230 & 2.0 & 11166.7$\pm$12.9 & 330.2$\pm$6.8 & 0.38$\pm$0.12 & 0.56$\pm$0.27 & 8,2\
` 10313885+2559023` & ` UGC05713 ` & 341483 & 56329.226 & 185 & 1.0 & 6191.5$\pm$12.5 & 162.1$\pm$5.9 & 0.18$\pm$0.03 & 0.96$\pm$0.13 & 45,4\
` 10323195+5424035` & ` UGC05720 ` & 351023 & 56419.211 & 330 & 1.0 & 1357.2$\pm$18.6 & 20.1$\pm$28.5 & -0.76$\pm$0.00 & 0.44$\pm$0.00 & 219,170\
` 10323481+6502277` & ` NGC3259 ` & 341684 & 56335.365 & 375 & 1.0 & 1644.0$\pm$14.3 & 40.8$\pm$18.5 & 0.01$\pm$0.04 & 1.05$\pm$0.18 & 39,3\
` 10325545+2830422` & ` NGC3277 ` & 062579 & 55504.481 & 20 & 2.0 & 1421.7$\pm$14.0 & 127.3$\pm$14.1 & -0.02$\pm$0.02 & 0.59$\pm$0.07 & 43,6\
` 10325545+2830422` & ` NGC3277 ` & 062580 & 55504.492 & 20 & 2.0 & 1416.7$\pm$13.6 & 138.3$\pm$10.2 & -0.00$\pm$0.02 & 0.60$\pm$0.06 & 44,6\
` 10341978+1345165` & ` UGC05739 ` & 262409 & 56251.463 & 150 & 1.0 & 2873.7$\pm$14.6 & 17.0$\pm$26.7 & -0.32$\pm$0.01 & -0.43$\pm$0.04 & 176,13\
` 10344477-0158088` & ` UGC05745 ` & 342033 & 56343.349 & 200 & 1.0 & 892.6$\pm$12.7 & 73.3$\pm$10.6 & -0.19$\pm$0.00 & -0.28$\pm$0.04 & 149,10\
` 10361516-0820021` & ` IC0624 ` & 142183 & 55598.349 & 220 & 2.0 & 4927.2$\pm$14.3 & 228.3$\pm$8.6 & 0.43$\pm$0.12 & - & 7,0\
` 10361626+3719285` & ` NGC3294 ` & 262187 & 56242.466 & 115 & 1.0 & 1522.0$\pm$13.6 & 79.0$\pm$14.1 & -0.30$\pm$0.01 & 0.19$\pm$0.00 & 46,9\
` 10362128+5837124` & ` NGC3286 ` & 051086 & 55324.199 & 400 & 2.0 & 8004.2$\pm$12.5 & 271.1$\pm$7.4 & 0.22$\pm$0.51 & 0.61$\pm$0.42 & 1,1\
` 10362128+5837124` & ` NGC3286 ` & 051087 & 55324.210 & 400 & 2.0 & 8001.4$\pm$12.6 & 254.3$\pm$8.5 & - & 0.27$\pm$0.37 & 1,3\
` 10362128+5837124` & ` NGC3286 ` & 051385 & 55336.149 & 400 & 2.0 & 7975.5$\pm$14.2 & 246.1$\pm$7.5 & - & - & 0,1\
` 10362128+5837124` & ` NGC3286 ` & 051386 & 55336.166 & 400 & 2.0 & 7986.8$\pm$13.6 & 241.0$\pm$7.7 & - & - & 0,1\
` 10362128+5837124` & ` NGC3286 ` & 051387 & 55336.183 & 400 & 2.0 & 8005.6$\pm$13.4 & 265.8$\pm$6.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 10362128+5837124` & ` NGC3286 ` & 051582 & 55347.135 & 400 & 2.0 & 8013.2$\pm$14.1 & 261.3$\pm$7.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 10362128+5837124` & ` NGC3286 ` & 051583 & 55347.146 & 400 & 2.0 & 8024.6$\pm$13.3 & 260.7$\pm$8.0 & - & -0.16$\pm$0.66 & 1,2\
` 10384585+5330118` & ` NGC3310 ` & 162582 & 55955.293 & 170 & 1.0 & 952.7$\pm$12.6 & 80.3$\pm$10.0 & -0.26$\pm$0.00 & 0.51$\pm$0.01 & 226,20\
` 10390953+4141127` & ` NGC3319 ` & 250212 & 56000.125 & 85 & 1.0 & 699.7$\pm$20.2 & 39.6$\pm$27.1 & -0.63$\pm$0.18 & - & 6,1\
` 10390953+4141127` & ` NGC3319 ` & 252271 & 56078.155 & 270 & 1.0 & 719.6$\pm$19.9 & 27.7$\pm$33.2 & -0.48$\pm$0.21 & - & 5,0\
` 10433114+2455199` & ` NGC3344 ` & 163610 & 55984.402 & 330 & 1.0 & 529.6$\pm$13.9 & 53.1$\pm$12.8 & -0.22$\pm$0.00 & 0.01$\pm$0.01 & 288,76\
` 10435773+1142129` & ` NGC3351 ` & 162304 & 55946.491 & 163 & 1.0 & 712.6$\pm$13.3 & 83.3$\pm$7.8 & -0.43$\pm$0.00 & -0.70$\pm$0.02 & 210,12\
` 10461264+0148479` & ` NGC3365 ` & 262798 & 56262.473 & 164 & 1.0 & 988.9$\pm$17.2 & 21.2$\pm$33.0 & -0.55$\pm$0.01 & 0.08$\pm$0.06 & 45,11\
` 10463496+1345026` & ` NGC3367 ` & 262573 & 56255.461 & 70 & 1.0 & 2988.1$\pm$14.0 & 115.5$\pm$12.8 & -0.04$\pm$0.00 & -0.21$\pm$0.01 & 423,32\
` 10464574+1149117` & ` NGC3368 ` & 163119 & 55972.419 & 315 & 1.0 & 867.5$\pm$12.5 & 124.7$\pm$4.3 & 0.17$\pm$0.01 & 0.61$\pm$0.10 & 47,3\
` 10470999+7250228` & ` NGC3348 ` & 140795 & 55548.495 & 425 & 2.0 & 2736.9$\pm$12.6 & 253.6$\pm$6.4 & 0.18$\pm$0.11 & - & 10,0\
` 10474048+3855533` & ` UGC05893 ` & 140728 & 55546.381 & 85 & 2.0 & 10419.0$\pm$15.2 & 310.6$\pm$7.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 10474143+1104376` & ` UGC05897 ` & 162716 & 55958.303 & 70 & 1.0 & 2653.6$\pm$18.7 & 45.2$\pm$30.0 & -0.30$\pm$0.12 & - & 9,0\
` 10474239+1359083` & ` NGC3377 ` & 262694 & 56260.439 & 47 & 1.0 & 653.4$\pm$14.7 & 150.4$\pm$4.0 & 0.75$\pm$0.36 & - & 1,0\
` 10474959+1234538` & ` NGC3379 ` & 262660 & 56259.448 & 67 & 1.0 & 874.8$\pm$13.9 & 222.4$\pm$3.1 & 0.12$\pm$0.07 & 0.45$\pm$0.15 & 11,2\
` 10495938+0021115` & ` PGC032447 ` & 141321 & 55567.408 & 70 & 2.0 & 11045.0$\pm$20.7 & 122.1$\pm$33.3 & 0.46$\pm$0.37 & - & 6,0\
` 10495938+0021115` & ` PGC032447 ` & 141968 & 55590.435 & 250 & 2.0 & 11033.1$\pm$14.8 & 148.7$\pm$15.0 & 0.10$\pm$0.12 & - & 13,0\
` 10505331+1324437` & ` NGC3412 ` & 262661 & 56259.464 & 155 & 1.0 & 816.0$\pm$13.4 & 99.6$\pm$5.2 & - & - & 0,0\
` 10511624+2758298` & ` NGC3414 ` & 262188 & 56242.486 & 195 & 1.0 & 1435.3$\pm$15.2 & 239.1$\pm$4.7 & 0.17$\pm$0.03 & 0.62$\pm$0.09 & 30,4\
` 10511799+4434185` & ` UGC05953 ` & 160965 & 55873.493 & 80 & 1.0 & 3176.7$\pm$12.6 & 129.8$\pm$6.9 & 0.87$\pm$0.27 & - & 4,0\
` 10521141+3257015` & ` NGC3430 ` & 163188 & 55976.217 & 35 & 1.0 & 1547.7$\pm$13.7 & 70.0$\pm$12.9 & -0.41$\pm$0.00 & -0.49$\pm$0.00 & 82,6\
` 10523113+3637076` & ` NGC3432 ` & 252363 & 56081.151 & 213 & 1.0 & 440.6$\pm$70.7 & 51.1$\pm$46.2 & - & - & AGN\
` 10535485+7341253` & ` NGC3403 ` & 351022 & 56419.126 & 435 & 1.0 & 1192.7$\pm$49.4 & 91.1$\pm$72.8 & -0.35$\pm$0.00 & - & 12,0\
` 10561600+4219591` & ` PGC032873 ` & 161354 & 55892.451 & 40 & 2.0 & 7353.7$\pm$14.8 & 325.8$\pm$7.1 & 0.29$\pm$0.05 & 0.78$\pm$0.43 & 14,1\
` 10561600+4219591` & ` PGC032873 ` & 251790 & 56063.211 & 220 & 1.0 & 7366.6$\pm$13.0 & 348.5$\pm$5.3 & 0.20$\pm$0.06 & 0.16$\pm$0.20 & 22,3\
` 10561600+4219591` & ` PGC032873 ` & 262117 & 56240.485 & 40 & 1.0 & 7352.8$\pm$12.7 & 343.8$\pm$5.7 & 0.27$\pm$0.06 & 0.46$\pm$0.29 & 14,2\
` 11000239+1450295` & ` NGC3485 ` & 262595 & 56256.465 & 50 & 1.0 & 1393.2$\pm$11.5 & 52.9$\pm$16.5 & -0.24$\pm$0.02 & -0.15$\pm$0.07 & 71,10\
` 11001858+1354045` & ` NGC3489 ` & 342035 & 56343.420 & 250 & 1.0 & 656.1$\pm$12.4 & 105.2$\pm$5.6 & 0.33$\pm$0.02 & - & 22,0\
` 11002394+2858293` & ` NGC3486 ` & 250802 & 56017.318 & 225 & 1.0 & 640.2$\pm$13.1 & 56.5$\pm$11.3 & 0.10$\pm$0.02 & 0.91$\pm$0.06 & 48,6\
` 11004538+1033117` & ` IC0664 ` & 142182 & 55598.270 & 50 & 2.0 & 9960.2$\pm$15.3 & 304.3$\pm$7.3 & -0.61$\pm$0.27 & -0.47$\pm$0.64 & 3,2\
` 11004795+1043417` & ` UGC06093 ` & 341460 & 56328.446 & 205 & 1.0 & 10580.3$\pm$11.9 & 179.6$\pm$8.5 & 0.43$\pm$0.03 & 0.76$\pm$0.09 & 34,7\
` 11031119+2758207` & ` NGC3504 ` & 163611 & 55984.419 & 330 & 1.0 & 1458.9$\pm$13.0 & 109.7$\pm$6.2 & 0.19$\pm$0.00 & -0.26$\pm$0.00 & 455,74\
` 11032539+1808072` & ` NGC3507 ` & 162227 & 55943.532 & 300 & 1.0 & 906.7$\pm$13.9 & 60.8$\pm$14.8 & 0.11$\pm$0.01 & 0.28$\pm$0.05 & 124,10\
` 11042732+3812320` & ` UGC06132 ` & 141415 & 55570.349 & 85 & 2.0 & 8788.7$\pm$26.3 & 162.8$\pm$55.0 & - & - & AGN\
` 11042732+3812320` & ` UGC06132 ` & 141794 & 55584.299 & 95 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & AGN\
` 11054859-0002092` & ` NGC3521 ` & 162055 & 55937.380 & 211 & 1.0 & 752.6$\pm$14.3 & 122.0$\pm$4.8 & 0.55$\pm$0.05 & - & 5,0\
` 11064749+7234066` & ` NGC3516 ` & 340521 & 56282.490 & 367 & 1.0 & 2582.6$\pm$15.0 & 179.1$\pm$9.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 11143700+1249048` & ` NGC3593 ` & 262615 & 56257.474 & 89 & 1.0 & 592.7$\pm$15.5 & 75.5$\pm$9.1 & -0.21$\pm$0.01 & 0.27$\pm$0.03 & 108,16\
` 11150622+1447136` & ` NGC3596 ` & 144326 & 55659.108 & 65 & 1.0 & 1154.0$\pm$14.9 & 37.0$\pm$16.6 & -0.32$\pm$0.00 & -0.14$\pm$0.00 & 84,7\
` 11155197+4135289` & ` NGC3600 ` & 262516 & 56254.470 & 10 & 1.0 & 674.6$\pm$15.6 & 52.2$\pm$25.0 & -0.87$\pm$0.01 & 0.44$\pm$0.02 & 43,56\
` 11165465+1803065` & ` NGC3607 ` & 262695 & 56260.455 & 125 & 1.0 & 916.3$\pm$13.6 & 226.3$\pm$3.7 & 0.38$\pm$0.05 & 0.78$\pm$0.27 & 16,2\
` 11165896+1808547` & ` NGC3608 ` & 262216 & 56245.498 & 80 & 1.0 & 1189.3$\pm$13.1 & 197.6$\pm$3.3 & 0.03$\pm$0.07 & - & 10,0\
` 11183613+5759597` & ` NGC3613 ` & 262738 & 56261.461 & 100 & 1.0 & 2006.5$\pm$13.6 & 214.2$\pm$3.6 & -0.76$\pm$0.37 & - & 2,0\
` 11185595+1305319` & ` NGC3623 ` & 162723 & 55958.485 & 234 & 1.0 & 748.1$\pm$12.9 & 152.2$\pm$3.8 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & 0.81$\pm$0.18 & 26,2\
` 11201502+1259286` & ` NGC3627 ` & 163427 & 55980.238 & 45 & 1.0 & 696.3$\pm$12.7 & 121.3$\pm$4.7 & 0.24$\pm$0.01 & 1.06$\pm$0.12 & 59,2\
` 11201701+1335221` & ` NGC3628 ` & 162965 & 55968.459 & 185 & 1.0 & 804.1$\pm$16.6 & 84.4$\pm$28.9 & -0.14$\pm$0.09 & -0.33$\pm$0.29 & 16,2\
` 11205383+5656366` & ` PGC034754 ` & 342958 & 56374.335 & 315 & 1.0 & 13757.0$\pm$15.8 & 373.3$\pm$8.3 & - & - & 0,1\
` 11210685+0314051` & ` NGC3640 ` & 340780 & 56293.415 & 100 & 1.0 & 1257.9$\pm$14.1 & 180.1$\pm$4.2 & - & - & 0,2\
` 11211226-0259029` & ` PGC034786 ` & 342034 & 56343.366 & 270 & 1.0 & 7283.3$\pm$12.6 & 140.5$\pm$12.6 & -0.20$\pm$0.01 & 0.11$\pm$0.06 & 158,12\
` 11212841+3432394` & ` PGC094177 ` & 140494 & 55542.412 & 170 & 2.0 & 12180.0$\pm$15.9 & 297.3$\pm$10.9 & -0.80$\pm$0.55 & - & 3,1\
` 11221801+5904272` & ` NGC3642 ` & 250705 & 56015.181 & 49 & 1.0 & 1536.8$\pm$14.7 & 84.9$\pm$10.5 & -0.24$\pm$0.00 & 0.07$\pm$0.00 & 77,17\
` 11233229-0839308` & ` NGC3660 ` & 340587 & 56284.500 & 110 & 1.0 & 3603.5$\pm$12.5 & 94.6$\pm$9.7 & -0.21$\pm$0.01 & 0.76$\pm$0.03 & 86,18\
` 11244363+3845460` & ` NGC3665 ` & 262737 & 56261.443 & 25 & 1.0 & 2030.9$\pm$15.6 & 224.0$\pm$5.0 & -0.21$\pm$0.04 & 0.21$\pm$0.19 & 21,3\
` 11260858+4335093` & ` NGC3675 ` & 262797 & 56262.442 & 1 & 1.0 & 728.2$\pm$14.9 & 110.9$\pm$5.2 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & - & 22,0\
` 11262660+5702538` & ` NGC3674 ` & 262638 & 56258.499 & 30 & 1.0 & 2015.3$\pm$13.7 & 213.3$\pm$6.2 & - & - & 2,0\
` 11271117+1701491` & ` NGC3684 ` & 250709 & 56015.353 & 295 & 1.0 & 1117.7$\pm$13.0 & 25.3$\pm$25.9 & -0.41$\pm$0.00 & -0.38$\pm$0.00 & 41,4\
` 11273188+5652361` & ` NGC3683 ` & 251033 & 56024.107 & 126 & 1.0 & 1658.8$\pm$22.1 & 79.0$\pm$25.9 & -0.35$\pm$0.05 & - & 18,1\
` 11284198+0432222` & ` b22 ` & 162719 & 55958.413 & 150 & 2.0 & 37498.4$\pm$16.1 & 349.7$\pm$19.3 & - & - & -\
` 11284198+0432222` & ` b22 ` & 162720 & 55958.425 & 150 & 2.0 & 37491.2$\pm$12.6 & 368.8$\pm$17.0 & - & - & -\
` 11284198+0432222` & ` b22 ` & 162721 & 55958.436 & 150 & 2.0 & 37530.2$\pm$17.7 & 373.9$\pm$20.2 & - & - & -\
` 11284198+0432222` & ` b22 ` & 250521 & 56010.419 & 150 & 1.0 & 37553.4$\pm$15.4 & 373.3$\pm$18.8 & - & - & -\
` 11300745+0916358` & ` NGC3705 ` & 262518 & 56254.508 & 122 & 1.0 & 980.7$\pm$13.3 & 103.3$\pm$8.7 & -0.04$\pm$0.03 & 0.47$\pm$0.19 & 41,3\
` 11323494+5304041` & ` NGC3718 ` & 163279 & 55977.237 & 45 & 1.0 & 951.5$\pm$14.0 & 176.9$\pm$6.2 & -0.01$\pm$0.02 & 0.56$\pm$0.09 & 53,4\
` 11335553+2338375` & ` UGC06548 ` & 250151 & 55999.188 & 40 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 11344932+4904388` & ` IC0712 ` & 142200 & 55598.481 & 280 & 2.0 & 9826.4$\pm$15.7 & 313.7$\pm$8.2 & 0.12$\pm$0.34 & -0.08$\pm$0.43 & 4,2\
` 11355732+7032081` & ` NGC3735 ` & 142412 & 55605.357 & 355 & 2.0 & 2639.4$\pm$13.8 & 147.9$\pm$13.9 & -0.07$\pm$0.01 & 1.01$\pm$0.03 & 106,13\
` 11364797+5417372` & ` NGC3756 ` & 163695 & 55987.222 & 1 & 1.0 & 1254.2$\pm$13.5 & 23.8$\pm$26.2 & -0.35$\pm$0.05 & - & 21,0\
` 11380904-0936257` & ` NGC3789 ` & 162059 & 55937.478 & 175 & 1.0 & 5483.2$\pm$16.6 & 179.4$\pm$11.9 & 0.27$\pm$0.13 & 0.46$\pm$0.61 & 11,1\
` 11400684+5836473` & ` NGC3795 ` & 351548 & 56441.162 & 415 & 1.0 & 1176.8$\pm$19.1 & 60.0$\pm$39.8 & -0.32$\pm$0.00 & -0.01$\pm$0.00 & 10,3\
` 11401689+1743404` & ` NGC3801 ` & 250803 & 56017.347 & 300 & 1.0 & 3426.4$\pm$12.3 & 187.0$\pm$10.0 & -0.02$\pm$0.06 & 0.54$\pm$0.20 & 28,3\
` 11404166+2020348` & ` NGC3805 ` & 163510 & 55982.442 & 245 & 2.0 & 6479.9$\pm$13.5 & 294.5$\pm$6.1 & -0.11$\pm$0.04 & 0.15$\pm$0.15 & 29,4\
` 11405873+1128160` & ` NGC3810 ` & 161626 & 55916.432 & 215 & 1.0 & 950.5$\pm$13.0 & 68.9$\pm$8.2 & -0.16$\pm$0.02 & -0.03$\pm$0.18 & 42,3\
` 11415735-0609203` & ` NGC3818 ` & 143961 & 55648.271 & 105 & 2.0 & 1637.4$\pm$13.9 & 192.9$\pm$6.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 11421107+1016398` & ` NGC3822 ` & 141628 & 55576.376 & 175 & 2.0 & 6047.8$\pm$15.6 & 126.3$\pm$17.1 & 0.04$\pm$0.02 & 0.85$\pm$0.06 & 51,4\
` 11422942+1819580` & ` UGC06670 ` & 163612 & 55984.436 & 170 & 1.0 & 878.6$\pm$18.5 & 48.3$\pm$29.7 & -0.58$\pm$0.03 & 0.42$\pm$0.08 & 27,11\
` 11440217+1956593` & ` NGC3842 ` & 150532 & 55700.219 & 175 & 2.0 & 6173.1$\pm$20.0 & 295.2$\pm$9.3 & - & - & 0,2\
` 11452766+2048257` & ` PGC036650 ` & 144239 & 55656.342 & 245 & 2.0 & 6848.3$\pm$11.1 & 270.4$\pm$6.9 & 0.19$\pm$0.08 & 0.49$\pm$0.27 & 12,2\
` 11453317+5858408` & ` UGC06732 ` & 161514 & 55896.501 & 5 & 1.0 & 2356.9$\pm$12.8 & 94.2$\pm$7.5 & 0.34$\pm$0.03 & - & 33,0\
` 11454556+1049286` & ` NGC3869 ` & 161355 & 55892.496 & 136 & 2.0 & 2972.4$\pm$13.6 & 232.7$\pm$6.8 & 0.12$\pm$0.05 & 0.80$\pm$0.26 & 30,2\
` 11454906+1346000` & ` NGC3872 ` & 142835 & 55617.449 & 205 & 2.0 & 3078.2$\pm$14.7 & 336.7$\pm$5.6 & -0.27$\pm$0.25 & -0.42$\pm$0.30 & 3,3\
` 11483820+4842388` & ` NGC3893 ` & 262517 & 56254.490 & -5 & 1.0 & 918.6$\pm$13.8 & 67.3$\pm$11.3 & -0.40$\pm$0.01 & -0.50$\pm$0.09 & 61,5\
` 11484595+2938285` & ` PGC036880 ` & 350403 & 56395.330 & 190 & 1.0 & 6739.2$\pm$14.0 & 143.0$\pm$13.8 & 0.07$\pm$0.03 & 0.50$\pm$0.16 & 61,5\
` 11485036+5924561` & ` NGC3894 ` & 141028 & 55558.428 & 20 & 2.0 & 3229.7$\pm$14.7 & 326.0$\pm$10.1 & 0.34$\pm$0.05 & 0.90$\pm$0.16 & 22,3\
` 11491536+5605036` & ` NGC3898 ` & 144558 & 55673.286 & 290 & 2.0 & 1142.7$\pm$13.9 & 213.6$\pm$7.2 & 0.15$\pm$0.02 & 0.66$\pm$0.05 & 27,4\
` 11504150+2000544` & ` NGC3919 ` & 151268 & 55724.168 & 330 & 2.0 & 6008.8$\pm$14.5 & 287.7$\pm$9.8 & 0.34$\pm$0.08 & 0.75$\pm$0.35 & 12,2\
` 11504548+5149271` & ` NGC3917 ` & 341355 & 56323.519 & 244 & 1.0 & 906.9$\pm$2.4 & 11.9$\pm$29.5 & -0.02$\pm$0.23 & - & 5,0\
` 11514768+4840593` & ` NGC3928 ` & 342276 & 56353.442 & 361 & 1.0 & 933.8$\pm$13.1 & 55.2$\pm$12.3 & -0.31$\pm$0.00 & -0.06$\pm$0.01 & 210,49\
` 11524264+2037527` & ` NGC3937 ` & 151027 & 55714.194 & 215 & 2.0 & 6574.6$\pm$14.2 & 298.5$\pm$9.0 & 0.14$\pm$0.37 & - & 2,0\
` 11525536+3659109` & ` NGC3941 ` & 262637 & 56258.482 & 10 & 1.0 & 887.2$\pm$14.3 & 132.9$\pm$4.2 & 0.19$\pm$0.03 & 0.89$\pm$0.14 & 21,2\
` 11534174+4751316` & ` NGC3949 ` & 351491 & 56433.225 & 305 & 1.0 & 766.7$\pm$13.3 & 60.0$\pm$15.3 & -0.28$\pm$0.01 & -0.14$\pm$0.00 & 30,5\
` 11534902+5219355` & ` NGC3953 ` & 162545 & 55953.325 & 100 & 1.0 & 1014.5$\pm$12.4 & 123.9$\pm$5.1 & 0.20$\pm$0.04 & 1.00$\pm$0.33 & 31,1\
` 11541224+0008116` & ` IC0745 ` & 351805 & 56449.136 & 185 & 1.0 & 1092.3$\pm$14.2 & 25.1$\pm$25.7 & -0.56$\pm$0.00 & 0.10$\pm$0.00 & 156,62\
` 11554511+5519144` & ` NGC3972 ` & 163566 & 55983.258 & 115 & 1.0 & 726.5$\pm$25.9 & 57.0$\pm$35.7 & -0.54$\pm$0.04 & - & 27,1\
` 11555729+0644580` & ` NGC3976 ` & 163406 & 55979.437 & 235 & 1.0 & 2454.8$\pm$11.8 & 172.0$\pm$4.0 & 0.40$\pm$0.04 & 1.42$\pm$0.40 & 25,1\
` 11562816+5507313` & ` NGC3982 ` & 163407 & 55979.458 & 375 & 1.0 & 1077.3$\pm$12.4 & 62.9$\pm$9.0 & 0.01$\pm$0.00 & 1.33$\pm$0.01 & 191,20\
` 11573559+5527318` & ` NGC3990 ` & 142770 & 55616.466 & 220 & 2.0 & 668.0$\pm$13.6 & 122.9$\pm$12.7 & - & - & 1,0\
` 11573559+5527318` & ` NGC3990 ` & 163696 & 55987.239 & 10 & 1.0 & 651.2$\pm$13.2 & 117.5$\pm$5.2 & - & - & 1,0\
` 11573559+5527318` & ` NGC3990 ` & 251059 & 56028.305 & 220 & 1.0 & 653.4$\pm$13.2 & 118.4$\pm$5.3 & - & - & 2,0\
` 11573598+5322282` & ` NGC3992 ` & 250603 & 56012.167 & 128 & 1.0 & 989.3$\pm$14.3 & 137.6$\pm$5.0 & 0.16$\pm$0.03 & 0.80$\pm$0.14 & 27,2\
` 11573685+3216400` & ` NGC3994 ` & 151530 & 55735.153 & 190 & 2.0 & 3062.5$\pm$13.5 & 148.0$\pm$9.2 & -0.04$\pm$0.00 & 0.27$\pm$0.02 & 137,17\
` 11575616+5527128` & ` NGC3998 ` & 343093 & 56380.340 & 310 & 1.0 & 1006.9$\pm$15.3 & 322.6$\pm$3.4 & 0.10$\pm$0.00 & 0.17$\pm$0.01 & 113,19\
` 11575902+2307300` & ` NGC4003 ` & 150215 & 55689.275 & 325 & 2.0 & 6363.8$\pm$14.8 & 157.5$\pm$11.9 & -0.05$\pm$0.01 & 0.19$\pm$0.08 & 91,9\
` 11592518+5057420` & ` NGC4026 ` & 342923 & 56373.388 & 343 & 1.0 & 918.0$\pm$13.9 & 186.7$\pm$3.5 & -0.11$\pm$0.16 & - & 4,0\
` 12002364-0105598` & ` NGC4030 ` & 163568 & 55983.308 & 220 & 2.0 & 1411.2$\pm$13.0 & 121.1$\pm$12.7 & -0.20$\pm$0.02 & 0.15$\pm$0.11 & 38,4\
` 12021217+6208142` & ` NGC4041 ` & 162724 & 55958.503 & 250 & 1.0 & 1179.9$\pm$12.3 & 93.1$\pm$8.9 & -0.22$\pm$0.01 & -0.05$\pm$0.04 & 129,14\
` 12030968+4431525` & ` NGC4051 ` & 350068 & 56388.357 & 323 & 1.0 & 663.6$\pm$12.5 & 83.0$\pm$13.4 & - & - & AGN\
` 12031320+0157029` & ` ARK344 ` & 144329 & 55659.193 & 210 & 2.0 & 5602.1$\pm$11.7 & 253.8$\pm$6.2 & -0.33$\pm$0.28 & - & 3,1\
` 12040140+2013559` & ` NGC4055 ` & 141417 & 55570.386 & 170 & 2.0 & 7211.6$\pm$14.4 & 263.1$\pm$8.3 & -0.03$\pm$0.06 & -0.01$\pm$0.21 & 18,4\
` 12040383+3153449` & ` NGC4062 ` & 162717 & 55958.321 & 120 & 1.0 & 729.4$\pm$15.8 & 42.9$\pm$21.5 & -0.29$\pm$0.05 & -0.02$\pm$0.34 & 23,3\
` 12042705+0153456` & ` NGC4073 ` & 341654 & 56333.454 & 260 & 1.0 & 5838.5$\pm$13.3 & 288.6$\pm$6.9 & 0.23$\pm$0.68 & - & 3,0\
` 12042964+2018581` & ` NGC4074 ` & 162963 & 55968.302 & 100 & 1.0 & 6672.1$\pm$14.5 & 160.3$\pm$10.2 & 0.02$\pm$0.00 & 1.08$\pm$0.01 & 147,21\
` 12044762+1035439` & ` NGC4078 ` & 163191 & 55976.295 & 195 & 1.0 & 2496.9$\pm$12.4 & 179.8$\pm$4.1 & 0.42$\pm$0.27 & - & 5,0\
` 12051554+4310079` & ` PGC038276 ` & 151231 & 55723.190 & 215 & 2.0 & 15430.3$\pm$15.5 & 354.1$\pm$9.0 & - & - & 0,1\
` 12053418+5032205` & ` NGC4088 ` & 342269 & 56353.230 & 20 & 1.0 & 759.4$\pm$13.5 & 72.9$\pm$14.1 & -0.42$\pm$0.02 & -0.36$\pm$0.08 & 56,7\
` 12060116+4728420` & ` NGC4096 ` & 262616 & 56257.491 & 76 & 1.0 & 517.6$\pm$12.4 & 70.7$\pm$12.8 & -0.45$\pm$0.02 & -0.54$\pm$0.12 & 50,4\
` 12060860+4934563` & ` NGC4100 ` & 351808 & 56449.198 & 325 & 1.0 & 1041.0$\pm$15.0 & 99.5$\pm$10.6 & -0.45$\pm$0.00 & -0.60$\pm$0.00 & 195,12\
` 12062311+5242394` & ` NGC4102 ` & 144667 & 55676.110 & 38 & 2.0 & 841.9$\pm$13.3 & 151.4$\pm$11.8 & -0.09$\pm$0.00 & -0.13$\pm$0.02 & 412,22\
` 12070312+4303554` & ` NGC4111 ` & 262739 & 56261.479 & 160 & 1.0 & 739.3$\pm$14.9 & 150.1$\pm$3.8 & 0.37$\pm$0.02 & - & 29,0\
` 12080557+2514141` & ` UGC07115 ` & 350688 & 56408.299 & 215 & 1.0 & 6668.3$\pm$13.0 & 238.3$\pm$8.9 & 0.30$\pm$0.12 & - & 8,1\
` 12080601+6510268` & ` NGC4125 ` & 140796 & 55548.526 & 82 & 2.0 & 1253.8$\pm$13.8 & 224.5$\pm$7.8 & 0.25$\pm$0.01 & 0.52$\pm$0.07 & 33,3\
` 12080601+6510268` & ` NGC4125 ` & 141796 & 55584.424 & 82 & 2.0 & 1281.1$\pm$13.8 & 225.1$\pm$7.2 & 0.30$\pm$0.02 & 0.45$\pm$0.07 & 29,4\
` 12080601+6510268` & ` NGC4125 ` & 142590 & 55611.417 & 262 & 2.0 & 1279.9$\pm$14.3 & 220.7$\pm$8.8 & 0.29$\pm$0.02 & 0.42$\pm$0.07 & 33,5\
` 12083235+6846034` & ` NGC4128 ` & 144504 & 55670.232 & 425 & 2.0 & 2231.2$\pm$15.2 & 234.2$\pm$6.8 & 0.09$\pm$0.09 & 0.63$\pm$0.18 & 9,2\
` 12091770+2955393` & ` NGC4136 ` & 252844 & 56101.148 & 210 & 1.0 & 573.2$\pm$14.9 & 34.8$\pm$19.2 & -0.43$\pm$0.01 & 0.10$\pm$0.04 & 70,23\
` 12092978+4341071` & ` NGC4138 ` & 341459 & 56328.286 & 150 & 1.0 & 833.3$\pm$13.7 & 120.9$\pm$5.1 & 0.14$\pm$0.01 & 0.93$\pm$0.04 & 51,6\
` 12093608+4232031` & ` NGC4143 ` & 262696 & 56260.473 & 145 & 1.0 & 904.8$\pm$15.7 & 223.7$\pm$3.7 & 0.25$\pm$0.02 & 0.61$\pm$0.06 & 28,6\
` 12095860+4627258` & ` NGC4144 ` & 252403 & 56084.212 & 284 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 12095860+4627258` & ` NGC4144 ` & 262697 & 56260.488 & 70 & 1.0 & 163.0$\pm$0.0 & 10.3$\pm$27.9 & -0.87$\pm$0.15 & 0.63$\pm$0.38 & 2,2\
` 12103265+3924207` & ` NGC4151 ` & 162510 & 55951.332 & 130 & 1.0 & 949.5$\pm$13.0 & 111.8$\pm$8.0 & - & - & AGN\
` 12103285+5818137` & ` NGC4149 ` & 250706 & 56015.198 & 85 & 1.0 & 3017.7$\pm$15.9 & 141.2$\pm$13.7 & -0.11$\pm$0.06 & - & 25,0\
` 12104427+3820103` & ` PGC038759 ` & 163281 & 55977.269 & 10 & 1.0 & 6812.1$\pm$17.8 & 106.0$\pm$18.4 & - & - & AGN\
` 12110436+5029048` & ` NGC4157 ` & 252364 & 56081.197 & 243 & 1.0 & 715.8$\pm$28.2 & 85.7$\pm$41.8 & -0.40$\pm$0.13 & 0.41$\pm$0.75 & 5,2\
` 12150502+3311500` & ` NGC4203 ` & 140731 & 55546.449 & 50 & 2.0 & 1031.3$\pm$13.7 & 166.0$\pm$8.6 & 0.14$\pm$0.01 & 0.72$\pm$0.03 & 45,6\
` 12150502+3311500` & ` NGC4203 ` & 141352 & 55569.392 & 5 & 2.0 & 1044.1$\pm$13.8 & 175.3$\pm$8.3 & 0.07$\pm$0.01 & 0.66$\pm$0.04 & 43,6\
` 12150502+3311500` & ` NGC4203 ` & 250710 & 56015.379 & 225 & 1.0 & 1049.6$\pm$14.0 & 176.8$\pm$3.3 & 0.05$\pm$0.01 & 0.66$\pm$0.03 & 47,5\
` 12150502+3311500` & ` NGC4203 ` & 250905 & 56019.371 & 181 & 1.0 & 1051.1$\pm$13.9 & 168.8$\pm$3.8 & 0.07$\pm$0.02 & 0.68$\pm$0.05 & 49,5\
` 12150502+3311500` & ` NGC4203 ` & 251351 & 56037.102 & 25 & 1.0 & 1059.4$\pm$14.6 & 169.1$\pm$3.7 & 0.07$\pm$0.02 & 0.64$\pm$0.05 & 44,5\
` 12153917+3619368` & ` NGC4214 ` & 340585 & 56284.420 & 128 & 1.0 & 229.6$\pm$36.6 & 40.2$\pm$103.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 12153917+3619368` & ` NGC4214 ` & 340586 & 56284.433 & 128 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & AGN\
` 12153937+1354053` & ` NGC4212 ` & 250015 & 55989.432 & 255 & 1.0 & -131.6$\pm$14.1 & 51.7$\pm$15.8 & -0.38$\pm$0.01 & -0.55$\pm$0.04 & 200,10\
` 12155089+4705304` & ` NGC4217 ` & 252906 & 56103.157 & 247 & 1.0 & 994.9$\pm$14.6 & 117.3$\pm$17.2 & -0.26$\pm$0.01 & 0.06$\pm$0.00 & 28,4\
` 12155444+1308578` & ` NGC4216 ` & 140732 & 55546.466 & 125 & 2.0 & 115.5$\pm$13.6 & 190.3$\pm$6.9 & 0.35$\pm$0.03 & 0.72$\pm$0.10 & 17,2\
` 12155451+0624040` & ` NGC4215 ` & 342956 & 56374.213 & 175 & 1.0 & 1973.2$\pm$13.3 & 140.4$\pm$4.5 & - & - & 1,0\
` 12162252+1318254` & ` NGC4222 ` & 163282 & 55977.287 & 60 & 1.0 & 196.0$\pm$23.1 & 59.6$\pm$37.3 & -0.59$\pm$0.02 & -0.06$\pm$0.07 & 38,12\
` 12172630+7048094` & ` NGC4250 ` & 141322 & 55567.480 & 355 & 2.0 & 1997.6$\pm$13.1 & 132.1$\pm$13.3 & 0.18$\pm$0.02 & 0.98$\pm$0.07 & 64,7\
` 12173678+2936288` & ` NGC4245 ` & 150859 & 55708.226 & 315 & 1.0 & 834.6$\pm$12.5 & 91.8$\pm$6.9 & -0.12$\pm$0.04 & 0.40$\pm$0.19 & 19,3\
` 12174990+4724329` & ` NGC4248 ` & 351845 & 56450.200 & 285 & 1.0 & 445.9$\pm$20.7 & 48.3$\pm$33.7 & -0.41$\pm$0.14 & - & 6,1\
` 12182648+2948461` & ` NGC4253 ` & 251054 & 56024.368 & 290 & 1.0 & 3619.5$\pm$35.8 & 101.9$\pm$41.4 & - & - & AGN\
` 12184303+6553530` & ` NGC4256 ` & 162722 & 55958.469 & 402 & 1.0 & 2489.3$\pm$13.2 & 181.4$\pm$6.8 & 0.35$\pm$0.11 & - & 12,0\
` 12184303+6553530` & ` NGC4256 ` & 250801 & 56017.292 & 400 & 1.0 & 2471.8$\pm$14.6 & 196.6$\pm$5.2 & 0.42$\pm$0.08 & - & 13,0\
` 12184962+1424593` & ` NGC4254 ` & 251062 & 56028.334 & 203 & 1.0 & 2360.5$\pm$13.1 & 70.1$\pm$10.2 & -0.21$\pm$0.01 & 0.59$\pm$0.04 & 81,9\
` 12185618+0447093` & ` NGC4255 ` & 341274 & 56317.380 & 140 & 1.0 & 1939.5$\pm$15.1 & 177.7$\pm$14.1 & -0.14$\pm$0.25 & - & 4,0\
` 12185761+4718133` & ` NGC4258 ` & 161983 & 55933.406 & 76 & 1.0 & 416.0$\pm$14.7 & 119.2$\pm$5.8 & -0.15$\pm$0.01 & 0.81$\pm$0.04 & 64,7\
` 12192224+0605556` & ` NGC4260 ` & 341526 & 56330.336 & 225 & 1.0 & 1734.9$\pm$12.3 & 148.3$\pm$5.1 & 0.53$\pm$0.09 & - & 11,0\
` 12192326+0549289` & ` NGC4261 ` & 351779 & 56448.173 & 173 & 1.0 & 2177.0$\pm$13.0 & 314.0$\pm$4.1 & 0.42$\pm$0.02 & 0.63$\pm$0.11 & 28,2\
` 12195066+2936529` & ` NGC4274 ` & 350329 & 56394.127 & 160 & 1.0 & 841.2$\pm$13.1 & 97.2$\pm$6.6 & -0.05$\pm$0.01 & 0.22$\pm$0.10 & 56,4\
` 12200679+2916502` & ` NGC4278 ` & 262799 & 56262.492 & 35 & 1.0 & 592.9$\pm$14.4 & 262.2$\pm$4.5 & 0.11$\pm$0.01 & 0.40$\pm$0.02 & 93,11\
` 12204209+2920454` & ` NGC4286 ` & 262617 & 56257.507 & 115 & 1.0 & 623.9$\pm$17.5 & 48.7$\pm$29.5 & -0.07$\pm$0.06 & - & 20,1\
` 12211289+1822566` & ` NGC4293 ` & 144601 & 55674.114 & 77 & 1.0 & 895.6$\pm$14.7 & 106.0$\pm$9.3 & 0.23$\pm$0.02 & 0.92$\pm$0.22 & 63,2\
` 12213279+1436217` & ` NGC4298 ` & 144531 & 55671.122 & 123 & 1.0 & 1093.9$\pm$16.0 & 74.2$\pm$16.6 & -0.46$\pm$0.00 & -0.46$\pm$0.03 & 162,15\
` 12213279+1436217` & ` NGC4298 ` & 144532 & 55671.134 & 123 & 1.0 & 1090.8$\pm$14.5 & 29.2$\pm$27.5 & -0.46$\pm$0.00 & -0.49$\pm$0.00 & 161,14\
` 12221234+0708398` & ` NGC4309 ` & 144533 & 55671.151 & 70 & 1.0 & 1015.2$\pm$15.7 & 35.7$\pm$19.9 & -0.15$\pm$0.00 & 0.15$\pm$0.00 & 38,5\
` 12221234+0708398` & ` NGC4309 ` & 144534 & 55671.162 & 70 & 1.0 & 1001.9$\pm$20.5 & 32.7$\pm$32.3 & -0.19$\pm$0.08 & 0.42$\pm$0.77 & 15,2\
` 12223135+1532165` & ` NGC4312 ` & 342466 & 56360.240 & 173 & 1.0 & 124.6$\pm$13.8 & 73.4$\pm$17.2 & -0.47$\pm$0.02 & -0.38$\pm$0.15 & 49,4\
` 12230190+5826409` & ` NGC4335 ` & 142836 & 55617.467 & 325 & 2.0 & 4530.5$\pm$13.4 & 293.5$\pm$6.9 & 0.47$\pm$0.05 & 0.93$\pm$0.33 & 16,2\
` 12232410+0240449` & ` MRK0050 ` & 342468 & 56360.276 & 175 & 1.0 & 6987.8$\pm$23.1 & 117.8$\pm$25.6 & - & - & AGN\
` 12233902+0703141` & ` NGC4342 ` & 350231 & 56391.326 & 165 & 1.0 & 734.1$\pm$12.7 & 274.1$\pm$2.7 & -0.14$\pm$0.41 & - & 2,0\
` 12235781+1641360` & ` NGC4350 ` & 350597 & 56403.126 & 210 & 1.0 & 1060.9$\pm$13.7 & 130.0$\pm$6.7 & - & - & 0,2\
` 12245493+0726404` & ` NGC4370 ` & 351807 & 56449.179 & 260 & 1.0 & 761.6$\pm$14.9 & 104.8$\pm$16.2 & 0.11$\pm$0.13 & - & 16,1\
` 12253509+4541048` & ` NGC4389 ` & 351259 & 56426.274 & 280 & 1.0 & 684.7$\pm$16.3 & 18.0$\pm$28.2 & -0.54$\pm$0.00 & -0.65$\pm$0.03 & 164,15\
` 12254682+1239434` & ` NGC4388 ` & 163613 & 55984.454 & 269 & 1.0 & 2464.1$\pm$14.7 & 105.7$\pm$9.8 & -0.19$\pm$0.00 & 1.20$\pm$0.01 & 274,45\
` 12255562+1812501` & ` NGC4394 ` & 342277 & 56353.461 & 325 & 1.0 & 868.6$\pm$13.3 & 77.6$\pm$7.8 & 0.24$\pm$0.03 & 1.10$\pm$0.25 & 23,1\
` 12261279-0741059` & ` NGC4403 ` & 142442 & 55606.393 & 210 & 2.0 & 5151.6$\pm$13.9 & 185.5$\pm$10.8 & 0.24$\pm$0.11 & 0.64$\pm$0.34 & 14,3\
` 12262708+3113247` & ` NGC4414 ` & 252272 & 56078.224 & 340 & 1.0 & 660.6$\pm$14.7 & 115.6$\pm$5.1 & 0.44$\pm$0.04 & - & 12,0\
` 12265643+1502507` & ` NGC4419 ` & 163567 & 55983.275 & 130 & 1.0 & -238.7$\pm$14.0 & 118.9$\pm$5.2 & 0.07$\pm$0.01 & 0.44$\pm$0.07 & 107,5\
` 12272040+6448056` & ` NGC4441 ` & 341353 & 56323.396 & -10 & 1.0 & 2665.8$\pm$16.8 & 87.7$\pm$23.0 & -0.33$\pm$0.01 & -0.05$\pm$0.03 & 203,29\
` 12281111+4405368` & ` NGC4449 ` & 252236 & 56077.238 & 230 & 1.0 & 145.0$\pm$16.4 & 17.4$\pm$26.9 & -0.87$\pm$0.00 & 0.61$\pm$0.00 & 60,60\
` 12281542+2837130` & ` NGC4448 ` & 144425 & 55660.368 & 272 & 1.0 & 616.6$\pm$14.6 & 96.4$\pm$7.9 & -0.31$\pm$0.00 & -0.37$\pm$0.05 & 120,8\
` 12282963+1705058` & ` NGC4450 ` & 163429 & 55980.284 & 188 & 1.0 & 1911.7$\pm$13.0 & 118.2$\pm$4.7 & 0.20$\pm$0.02 & 0.62$\pm$0.07 & 34,4\
` 12284555+4451512` & ` NGC4460 ` & 250804 & 56017.382 & 220 & 1.0 & 441.6$\pm$15.1 & 17.3$\pm$26.4 & -0.60$\pm$0.01 & 0.26$\pm$0.02 & 80,41\
` 12290002+1358428` & ` NGC4459 ` & 350804 & 56411.309 & 285 & 1.0 & 1139.2$\pm$14.5 & 174.1$\pm$5.8 & 0.15$\pm$0.07 & - & 16,0\
` 12292799+0845006` & ` NGC4469 ` & 341083 & 56312.386 & 85 & 1.0 & 562.5$\pm$13.5 & 97.5$\pm$7.9 & -0.21$\pm$0.02 & 0.53$\pm$0.17 & 42,3\
` 12294887+1325455` & ` NGC4473 ` & 342993 & 56376.208 & 95 & 1.0 & 2204.3$\pm$14.1 & 185.9$\pm$4.0 & - & - & 1,0\
` 12303198+1229248` & ` NGC4486B ` & 151588 & 55736.137 & 200 & 1.0 & 1519.9$\pm$13.0 & 185.8$\pm$3.6 & -0.21$\pm$0.28 & - & 2,0\
` 12303636+4138370` & ` NGC4490 ` & 252845 & 56101.165 & 255 & 1.0 & 539.3$\pm$14.6 & 49.8$\pm$19.7 & -0.55$\pm$0.03 & 0.67$\pm$0.10 & 22,7\
` 12305772+1216132` & ` NGC4486A ` & 151589 & 55736.154 & 185 & 1.0 & 673.4$\pm$13.8 & 82.4$\pm$16.9 & -0.33$\pm$0.16 & - & 5,0\
` 12315921+1425134` & ` NGC4501 ` & 162056 & 55937.403 & 210 & 1.0 & 2233.7$\pm$14.5 & 146.5$\pm$5.4 & 0.36$\pm$0.01 & 0.78$\pm$0.05 & 61,7\
` 12321745-0733483` & ` NGC4504 ` & 163203 & 55976.397 & 145 & 1.0 & 975.1$\pm$16.1 & 31.5$\pm$27.2 & -0.24$\pm$0.05 & 0.00$\pm$0.37 & 24,3\
` 12340849+0239137` & ` NGC4527 ` & 144502 & 55670.175 & 145 & 2.0 & 1650.5$\pm$14.1 & 132.5$\pm$14.6 & -0.16$\pm$0.01 & 0.09$\pm$0.06 & 70,8\
` 12342712+0211163` & ` NGC4536 ` & 250167 & 55999.398 & 275 & 1.0 & 1742.3$\pm$14.7 & 97.3$\pm$7.9 & -0.30$\pm$0.00 & -0.28$\pm$0.00 & 298,23\
` 12352642+1429467` & ` NGC4548 ` & 162966 & 55968.517 & 300 & 1.0 & 425.3$\pm$14.1 & 104.4$\pm$5.9 & 0.34$\pm$0.03 & 0.63$\pm$0.12 & 28,3\
` 12353249+7340294` & ` UGC07767 ` & 341354 & 56323.445 & 420 & 1.0 & 1281.1$\pm$15.5 & 79.4$\pm$10.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 12354118+2631227` & ` NGC4555 ` & 140092 & 55533.493 & 120 & 2.0 & 6560.9$\pm$14.7 & 318.9$\pm$5.4 & 0.06$\pm$0.48 & - & 2,1\
` 12362080+2559146` & ` NGC4565 ` & 252365 & 56081.217 & 337 & 1.0 & 1179.5$\pm$15.2 & 166.4$\pm$4.8 & 0.18$\pm$0.02 & 0.73$\pm$0.07 & 33,4\
` 12362699+1126215` & ` NGC4564 ` & 342467 & 56360.257 & 230 & 1.0 & 1105.9$\pm$13.6 & 174.0$\pm$3.4 & -0.34$\pm$0.28 & - & 2,0\
` 12363035+2612009` & ` IC3582 ` & 162762 & 55959.340 & 40 & 2.0 & 6998.0$\pm$14.4 & 126.6$\pm$16.5 & 0.49$\pm$0.02 & - & 39,0\
` 12364981+1309463` & ` NGC4569 ` & 250879 & 56019.190 & 135 & 1.0 & -255.7$\pm$14.0 & 117.6$\pm$4.2 & 0.01$\pm$0.00 & 0.42$\pm$0.03 & 159,9\
` 12374359+1149051` & ` NGC4579 ` & 162057 & 55937.427 & 75 & 1.0 & 1476.9$\pm$15.2 & 161.5$\pm$4.6 & 0.27$\pm$0.01 & 0.56$\pm$0.03 & 84,9\
` 12382843+0419087` & ` NGC4586 ` & 144338 & 55659.347 & 295 & 1.0 & 745.8$\pm$14.9 & 62.0$\pm$13.4 & -0.01$\pm$0.02 & 0.97$\pm$0.10 & 68,5\
` 12395938+6136330` & ` NGC4605 ` & 252517 & 56088.160 & 300 & 1.0 & 110.5$\pm$16.5 & 24.5$\pm$26.3 & -0.59$\pm$0.02 & 0.20$\pm$0.05 & 40,17\
` 12413284+4109027` & ` NGC4618 ` & 252237 & 56077.255 & 245 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 12415270+4116253` & ` NGC4625 ` & 262639 & 56258.516 & 27 & 1.0 & 570.9$\pm$17.2 & 44.9$\pm$27.9 & -0.27$\pm$0.03 & -0.15$\pm$0.17 & 26,5\
` 12424098+1417451` & ` NGC4634 ` & 163703 & 55987.485 & 156 & 1.0 & 79.7$\pm$19.7 & 38.1$\pm$29.1 & -0.41$\pm$0.02 & -0.09$\pm$0.22 & 60,4\
` 12425218+5451215` & ` NGC4646 ` & 142887 & 55618.275 & 20 & 2.0 & 4514.1$\pm$14.0 & 268.0$\pm$6.6 & 0.23$\pm$0.09 & 1.26$\pm$0.90 & 10,1\
` 12434000+1133093` & ` NGC4649 ` & 150889 & 55709.225 & 288 & 2.0 & 1070.1$\pm$12.4 & 364.5$\pm$4.0 & -0.03$\pm$0.14 & - & 4,1\
` 12442937+1329552` & ` NGC4659 ` & 342924 & 56373.405 & 170 & 1.0 & 401.4$\pm$16.3 & 39.2$\pm$24.7 & - & - & 0,0\
` 12450867-0027428` & ` NGC4666 ` & 142248 & 55600.380 & 151 & 2.0 & 1465.7$\pm$12.7 & 110.2$\pm$16.4 & -0.22$\pm$0.01 & 0.19$\pm$0.04 & 82,12\
` 12451714+2707317` & ` NGC4670 ` & 351780 & 56448.228 & 260 & 1.0 & 1028.1$\pm$15.2 & 34.6$\pm$22.5 & -1.10$\pm$0.00 & 0.75$\pm$0.00 & 54,73\
` 12453470+2703386` & ` NGC4673 ` & 252328 & 56080.229 & 170 & 1.0 & 6721.4$\pm$12.6 & 216.2$\pm$5.0 & 0.28$\pm$0.12 & - & 7,0\
` 12463982+5432030` & ` NGC4686 ` & 142965 & 55619.265 & 5 & 2.0 & 4902.7$\pm$13.8 & 276.2$\pm$5.9 & 0.49$\pm$0.03 & 1.25$\pm$0.24 & 23,2\
` 12471526+1012124` & ` IC3773 ` & 341961 & 56341.320 & 200 & 1.0 & 1054.4$\pm$13.7 & 37.1$\pm$17.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 12482293+0829140` & ` NGC4698 ` & 250108 & 55998.270 & 170 & 1.0 & 963.6$\pm$14.1 & 128.9$\pm$5.2 & 0.12$\pm$0.02 & 0.94$\pm$0.06 & 51,5\
` 12490218-0839514` & ` NGC4699 ` & 150361 & 55694.176 & 215 & 2.0 & 1319.8$\pm$15.0 & 153.4$\pm$11.8 & - & - & 0,0\
` 12495381-0643027` & ` IC3812 ` & 150579 & 55701.165 & 185 & 2.0 & 3357.5$\pm$12.1 & 115.8$\pm$14.7 & -0.29$\pm$0.01 & -0.11$\pm$0.09 & 46,6\
` 12505314+4107125` & ` NGC4736 ` & 162718 & 55958.337 & 85 & 1.0 & 265.4$\pm$14.1 & 120.8$\pm$4.4 & 0.49$\pm$0.02 & - & 17,0\
` 12514803-1027172` & ` NGC4742 ` & 162060 & 55937.505 & 260 & 1.0 & 1243.4$\pm$17.3 & 98.1$\pm$7.3 & 0.47$\pm$0.18 & - & 2,0\
` 12530567-0912141` & ` NGC4761 ` & 341962 & 56341.412 & 230 & 1.0 & 4214.2$\pm$13.4 & 251.7$\pm$5.4 & 0.31$\pm$0.11 & 0.56$\pm$0.37 & 14,2\
` 12543242-0651339` & ` NGC4786 ` & 142443 & 55606.431 & 160 & 2.0 & 4526.3$\pm$14.4 & 305.1$\pm$7.3 & 0.11$\pm$0.12 & - & 10,1\
` 12543777+4631521` & ` NGC4800 ` & 251359 & 56037.343 & 380 & 1.0 & 836.4$\pm$12.3 & 101.7$\pm$6.0 & -0.24$\pm$0.02 & -0.03$\pm$0.09 & 50,5\
` 12561432+5652244` & ` UGC08058 ` & 144501 & 55670.149 & 25 & 2.0 & 13682.6$\pm$97.4 & 299.8$\pm$113.6 & - & - & AGN\
` 12564369+2140575` & ` NGC4826 ` & 350689 & 56408.330 & 200 & 1.0 & 378.3$\pm$13.9 & 90.9$\pm$6.0 & 0.13$\pm$0.01 & 0.33$\pm$0.04 & 69,6\
` 12592713+1410157` & ` NGC4866 ` & 141418 & 55570.422 & 45 & 2.0 & 1926.7$\pm$14.2 & 205.1$\pm$6.9 & 0.27$\pm$0.06 & 0.51$\pm$0.14 & 16,3\
` 12593570+2757338` & ` NGC4874 ` & 144340 & 55659.400 & 235 & 2.0 & 7067.0$\pm$14.2 & 266.2$\pm$8.3 & - & -0.46$\pm$0.59 & 1,1\
` 13000809+2758372` & ` NGC4884 ` & 144426 & 55660.392 & 200 & 2.0 & 6396.3$\pm$14.6 & 386.2$\pm$8.9 & - & - & 0,2\
` 13004296+3718552` & ` NGC4914 ` & 252366 & 56081.235 & 335 & 1.0 & 4583.0$\pm$15.3 & 233.3$\pm$4.5 & - & - & 0,1\
` 13045839+2907204` & ` NGC4952 ` & 150174 & 55688.329 & 205 & 2.0 & 5838.1$\pm$15.0 & 296.8$\pm$6.4 & 0.26$\pm$0.20 & - & 4,0\
` 13054887-0801129` & ` NGC4958 ` & 163509 & 55982.402 & 195 & 1.0 & 1429.2$\pm$13.1 & 156.4$\pm$3.7 & 0.19$\pm$0.02 & 0.76$\pm$0.11 & 29,2\
` 13084873-0646392` & ` NGC4981 ` & 162226 & 55943.512 & 145 & 1.0 & 1643.5$\pm$11.2 & 104.4$\pm$5.9 & -0.25$\pm$0.00 & -0.11$\pm$0.00 & 88,9\
` 13092704-0718450` & ` PGC1021091 ` & 162767 & 55959.468 & 130 & 2.0 & 6561.5$\pm$13.6 & 249.6$\pm$6.7 & 0.24$\pm$0.09 & 0.86$\pm$0.39 & 13,2\
` 13092704-0718450` & ` PGC1021091 ` & 251847 & 56064.176 & 130 & 1.0 & 6530.0$\pm$12.4 & 258.4$\pm$4.6 & 0.27$\pm$0.08 & 0.77$\pm$0.32 & 14,2\
` 13105631+3703321` & ` NGC5005 ` & 140208 & 55536.510 & 157 & 2.0 & 928.1$\pm$14.5 & 213.9$\pm$6.6 & 0.35$\pm$0.01 & 0.43$\pm$0.04 & 94,7\
` 13212311+0020333` & ` NGC5104 ` & 142142 & 55597.418 & 165 & 2.0 & 5497.1$\pm$15.5 & 157.5$\pm$15.9 & -0.11$\pm$0.01 & 0.12$\pm$0.08 & 103,9\
` 13234497+3133568` & ` NGC5127 ` & 351029 & 56419.327 & 260 & 1.0 & 4801.6$\pm$11.8 & 194.1$\pm$5.3 & 0.64$\pm$0.11 & - & 7,0\
` 13245144+3622424` & ` NGC5141 ` & 252908 & 56103.203 & 255 & 1.0 & 5197.5$\pm$13.2 & 247.8$\pm$4.8 & 0.39$\pm$0.06 & 0.92$\pm$0.27 & 17,2\
` 13245289-0404550` & ` NGC5133 ` & 163571 & 55983.423 & 210 & 2.0 & 6139.1$\pm$13.4 & 316.8$\pm$7.2 & 0.38$\pm$0.05 & 0.85$\pm$0.27 & 17,2\
` 13245289-0404550` & ` NGC5133 ` & 350402 & 56395.281 & 210 & 1.0 & 6152.1$\pm$11.1 & 338.3$\pm$8.1 & 0.24$\pm$0.08 & 0.47$\pm$0.22 & 17,3\
` 13315259+2000042` & ` UGC08516 ` & 351710 & 56447.242 & 225 & 1.0 & 982.7$\pm$15.6 & 46.1$\pm$26.7 & -0.64$\pm$0.00 & -0.08$\pm$0.00 & 68,34\
` 13322790+0718599` & ` NGC5208 ` & 143875 & 55646.266 & 165 & 2.0 & 6688.3$\pm$14.7 & 267.2$\pm$6.0 & 0.12$\pm$0.04 & 0.44$\pm$0.34 & 21,2\
` 13343506+3446405` & ` NGC5228 ` & 140733 & 55546.484 & 15 & 2.0 & 7583.7$\pm$12.6 & 221.0$\pm$7.3 & 0.16$\pm$0.07 & - & 13,0\
` 13360823-0829519` & ` NGC5232 ` & 143843 & 55644.324 & 250 & 2.0 & 6755.2$\pm$15.0 & 265.0$\pm$6.9 & 0.44$\pm$0.03 & 0.92$\pm$0.19 & 30,2\
` 13362618+0722109` & ` NGC5239 ` & 151531 & 55735.181 & 150 & 1.0 & 6931.0$\pm$12.1 & 96.0$\pm$10.2 & - & - & 1,2\
` 13373206+0853062` & ` NGC5248 ` & 341275 & 56317.413 & 95 & 1.0 & 1109.4$\pm$15.4 & 71.1$\pm$13.3 & -0.23$\pm$0.02 & -0.14$\pm$0.10 & 45,5\
` 13381586+0432330` & ` NGC5252 ` & 162461 & 55950.445 & 195 & 1.0 & 6788.9$\pm$14.3 & 235.9$\pm$6.8 & -0.09$\pm$0.00 & 0.74$\pm$0.01 & 73,21\
` 13410573+6740197` & ` NGC5283 ` & 350654 & 56407.247 & 460 & 1.0 & 3041.4$\pm$14.6 & 124.6$\pm$5.2 & -0.03$\pm$0.00 & 1.02$\pm$0.01 & 205,40\
` 13412423+5538347` & ` UGC08671 ` & 144441 & 55665.200 & 90 & 2.0 & 7424.2$\pm$16.2 & 182.0$\pm$11.3 & -0.03$\pm$0.33 & - & 4,2\
` 13412423+5538347` & ` UGC08671 ` & 144442 & 55665.213 & 90 & 2.0 & 7442.6$\pm$15.9 & 186.4$\pm$14.6 & -0.42$\pm$0.36 & -0.66$\pm$0.60 & 2,1\
` 13444207+5553131` & ` UGC08696 ` & 252691 & 56096.208 & 355 & 1.0 & 10952.9$\pm$27.3 & 208.6$\pm$30.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 13451913+4142444` & ` NGC5290 ` & 140319 & 55538.524 & 85 & 2.0 & 2539.4$\pm$15.8 & 118.2$\pm$18.6 & -0.06$\pm$0.02 & 0.64$\pm$0.10 & 59,6\
` 13461868+4351046` & ` NGC5296 ` & 143490 & 55632.260 & 130 & 2.0 & 2236.4$\pm$21.3 & 92.9$\pm$43.4 & -0.51$\pm$0.03 & -0.17$\pm$0.04 & 51,22\
` 13470039+6058229` & ` NGC5308 ` & 340782 & 56293.510 & 60 & 1.0 & 1821.2$\pm$15.0 & 133.1$\pm$9.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 13522671+1405281` & ` IC0948 ` & 250169 & 55999.487 & 155 & 1.0 & 6799.1$\pm$15.6 & 322.6$\pm$5.6 & 0.51$\pm$0.26 & 0.39$\pm$0.54 & 4,2\
` 13523859+4620591` & ` PGC049293 ` & 342957 & 56374.250 & 35 & 1.0 & 18106.4$\pm$16.3 & 389.0$\pm$13.4 & - & - & 0,1\
` 13531785+3329267` & ` NGC5347 ` & 350903 & 56416.131 & 100 & 1.0 & 2345.5$\pm$13.6 & 78.4$\pm$13.8 & -0.10$\pm$0.01 & 1.13$\pm$0.02 & 82,12\
` 13532674+4016592` & ` NGC5353 ` & 051436 & 55337.314 & 308 & 2.0 & 2180.5$\pm$14.3 & 300.1$\pm$5.0 & 0.22$\pm$0.03 & 0.45$\pm$0.10 & 22,3\
` 13532674+4016592` & ` NGC5353 ` & 051437 & 55337.326 & 308 & 2.0 & 2168.5$\pm$14.5 & 294.2$\pm$5.0 & 0.24$\pm$0.03 & 0.38$\pm$0.10 & 19,3\
` 13532674+4016592` & ` NGC5353 ` & 051806 & 55356.247 & 308 & 2.0 & 2148.4$\pm$13.5 & 301.3$\pm$4.7 & 0.21$\pm$0.03 & 0.29$\pm$0.10 & 20,4\
` 13532674+4016592` & ` NGC5353 ` & 051807 & 55356.261 & 308 & 2.0 & 2139.2$\pm$14.6 & 300.7$\pm$5.5 & 0.20$\pm$0.02 & 0.27$\pm$0.08 & 25,4\
` 13532674+4016592` & ` NGC5353 ` & 051981 & 55363.226 & 308 & 2.0 & 2142.0$\pm$14.6 & 294.1$\pm$5.6 & 0.17$\pm$0.03 & 0.26$\pm$0.08 & 24,4\
` 13532674+4016592` & ` NGC5353 ` & 051982 & 55363.242 & 308 & 2.0 & 2138.4$\pm$13.7 & 303.3$\pm$5.5 & 0.22$\pm$0.03 & 0.38$\pm$0.09 & 22,3\
` 13532674+4016592` & ` NGC5353 ` & 051983 & 55363.258 & 308 & 2.0 & 2146.2$\pm$13.7 & 300.7$\pm$5.7 & 0.21$\pm$0.06 & 0.25$\pm$0.15 & 14,3\
` 13560288+1822188` & ` UGC08850 ` & 150201 & 55689.131 & 200 & 2.0 & 14761.7$\pm$33.6 & 265.2$\pm$60.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 13560636+5944311` & ` NGC5389 ` & 351810 & 56449.243 & 361 & 1.0 & 1804.5$\pm$13.2 & 135.3$\pm$5.2 & 0.12$\pm$0.05 & - & 19,1\
` 13560724+0515169` & ` NGC5363 ` & 150890 & 55709.253 & 310 & 2.0 & 1000.7$\pm$13.3 & 225.8$\pm$5.9 & 0.00$\pm$0.01 & 0.20$\pm$0.03 & 109,14\
` 13561200+0500520` & ` NGC5364 ` & 340805 & 56294.510 & 102 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 13561200+0500520` & ` NGC5364 ` & 340806 & 56294.514 & 90 & 1.0 & 1213.4$\pm$16.3 & 86.2$\pm$18.8 & -0.21$\pm$0.03 & - & 9,1\
` 13580605+2140206` & ` PGC097421 ` & 162058 & 55937.452 & 113 & 2.0 & 19251.4$\pm$18.8 & 317.1$\pm$16.9 & - & - & 1,1\
` 13581486+0615318` & ` NGC5382 ` & 163570 & 55983.367 & 195 & 1.0 & 4270.7$\pm$12.6 & 241.3$\pm$3.4 & -0.03$\pm$0.24 & 0.93$\pm$0.50 & 5,1\
` 14003719-0251281` & ` NGC5400 ` & 142199 & 55598.463 & 85 & 2.0 & 7329.3$\pm$13.8 & 257.2$\pm$6.7 & 0.29$\pm$0.04 & 0.73$\pm$0.21 & 18,2\
` 14014186-1136251` & ` PGC049940 ` & 342922 & 56373.370 & 225 & 1.0 & 11082.6$\pm$21.5 & 245.1$\pm$16.6 & 0.41$\pm$0.21 & 0.15$\pm$0.40 & 8,3\
` 14061051+0921122` & ` NGC5463 ` & 144243 & 55656.412 & 230 & 2.0 & 7089.9$\pm$14.3 & 202.6$\pm$7.9 & 0.54$\pm$0.11 & - & 7,1\
` 14062152+5043299` & ` NGC5480 ` & 141546 & 55574.449 & 1 & 2.0 & 1845.8$\pm$14.6 & 61.7$\pm$27.1 & -0.42$\pm$0.00 & -0.52$\pm$0.02 & 171,14\
` 14063199+0601458` & ` NGC5470 ` & 350531 & 56402.362 & 250 & 1.0 & 985.1$\pm$33.0 & 26.7$\pm$35.5 & -0.42$\pm$0.08 & -0.26$\pm$0.71 & 13,2\
` 14095733+1732435` & ` NGC5490 ` & 143117 & 55623.340 & 184 & 2.0 & 4837.7$\pm$14.4 & 353.1$\pm$6.3 & 0.13$\pm$0.10 & - & 10,0\
` 14100154+5452547` & ` PGC050564 ` & 162303 & 55946.433 & 110 & 2.0 & 12316.3$\pm$14.2 & 362.9$\pm$8.2 & -0.29$\pm$0.35 & -0.02$\pm$0.50 & 7,2\
` 14113785-0109313` & ` NGC5496 ` & 351809 & 56449.216 & 168 & 1.0 & 1475.9$\pm$19.1 & 84.3$\pm$34.7 & -0.51$\pm$0.04 & 0.14$\pm$0.14 & 24,8\
` 14131490-0312272` & ` NGC5506 ` & 350529 & 56402.268 & 90 & 1.0 & 1750.4$\pm$16.7 & 131.0$\pm$18.4 & - & - & AGN\
` 14145230+2519034` & ` NGC5523 ` & 351712 & 56447.280 & 260 & 1.0 & 975.6$\pm$11.8 & 36.3$\pm$20.3 & -0.41$\pm$0.00 & -0.37$\pm$0.00 & 37,6\
` 14165292+1048264` & ` NGC5532 ` & 162547 & 55953.443 & 150 & 2.0 & 7287.8$\pm$15.2 & 342.7$\pm$6.1 & 0.53$\pm$0.05 & - & 14,0\
` 14182570+3629372` & ` NGC5557 ` & 260041 & 56145.127 & 270 & 1.0 & 3189.4$\pm$12.9 & 289.2$\pm$2.9 & -1.28$\pm$0.27 & -1.32$\pm$0.11 & 1,3\
` 14194820+5643445` & ` NGC5585 ` & 250880 & 56019.263 & 1 & 1.0 & 226.1$\pm$29.4 & 183.5$\pm$35.3 & -0.81$\pm$0.02 & 0.53$\pm$0.04 & 24,18\
` 14201994+0356009` & ` NGC5566 ` & 141712 & 55580.486 & 107 & 2.0 & 1465.5$\pm$13.7 & 103.7$\pm$18.0 & 0.30$\pm$0.04 & - & 11,0\
` 14202592-0920019` & ` PGC992360 ` & 350459 & 56397.317 & 190 & 1.0 & 13034.1$\pm$15.5 & 384.6$\pm$11.0 & 0.26$\pm$0.52 & -0.18$\pm$0.35 & 6,2\
` 14205100+0419547` & ` PGC051260 ` & 163508 & 55982.383 & 120 & 2.0 & 7974.0$\pm$12.5 & 196.5$\pm$7.7 & - & - & 0,4\
` 14210369+0316157` & ` NGC5576 ` & 152028 & 55753.138 & 275 & 1.0 & 1460.2$\pm$14.6 & 193.3$\pm$3.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 14211311+0326087` & ` NGC5577 ` & 342470 & 56360.340 & 240 & 1.0 & 1462.6$\pm$13.8 & 58.7$\pm$20.5 & -0.36$\pm$0.00 & -0.49$\pm$0.00 & 33,4\
` 14240759+3451320` & ` NGC5614 ` & 141967 & 55590.415 & 185 & 2.0 & 3808.6$\pm$12.4 & 211.7$\pm$7.3 & 0.44$\pm$0.03 & 0.97$\pm$0.21 & 24,2\
` 14281635+2550557` & ` NGC5629 ` & 162964 & 55968.386 & 110 & 2.0 & 4442.6$\pm$14.8 & 256.6$\pm$7.6 & -0.37$\pm$0.56 & -0.67$\pm$0.36 & 2,2\
` 14283173+2724326` & ` NGC5635 ` & 340588 & 56284.519 & 65 & 1.0 & 4222.6$\pm$13.9 & 232.2$\pm$11.5 & 0.18$\pm$0.05 & 1.05$\pm$0.48 & 20,1\
` 14294980+4937214` & ` NGC5660 ` & 163196 & 55976.364 & 30 & 1.0 & 2282.1$\pm$13.0 & 36.8$\pm$18.1 & -0.36$\pm$0.01 & -0.44$\pm$0.07 & 102,7\
` 14310477+2817143` & ` MRK0684 ` & 341124 & 56315.446 & 145 & 1.0 & 13481.8$\pm$26.7 & 179.4$\pm$33.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 14352967+4844293` & ` NGC5689 ` & 253401 & 56131.181 & 270 & 1.0 & 2165.3$\pm$13.6 & 161.9$\pm$4.8 & 0.22$\pm$0.08 & - & 11,0\
` 14372214+3634040` & ` NGC5695 ` & 340909 & 56305.466 & 140 & 1.0 & 4182.4$\pm$11.1 & 137.5$\pm$5.8 & 0.15$\pm$0.01 & 1.33$\pm$0.06 & 78,7\
` 14401152-0017211` & ` NGC5713 ` & 342994 & 56376.330 & 160 & 1.0 & 1846.2$\pm$14.5 & 101.4$\pm$18.8 & -0.33$\pm$0.01 & -0.00$\pm$0.02 & 184,45\
` 14422885+4150321` & ` NGC5739 ` & 050572 & 55309.435 & 214 & 2.0 & 5411.4$\pm$13.3 & 307.3$\pm$5.7 & 0.31$\pm$0.02 & 0.55$\pm$0.09 & 47,6\
` 14422885+4150321` & ` NGC5739 ` & 050573 & 55309.446 & 214 & 2.0 & 5415.2$\pm$13.5 & 317.9$\pm$6.4 & 0.31$\pm$0.03 & 0.56$\pm$0.10 & 42,4\
` 14422885+4150321` & ` NGC5739 ` & 050941 & 55322.157 & 34 & 2.0 & 5407.4$\pm$15.0 & 317.7$\pm$6.9 & 0.28$\pm$0.02 & 0.43$\pm$0.05 & 49,9\
` 14422885+4150321` & ` NGC5739 ` & 050942 & 55322.170 & 34 & 2.0 & 5418.9$\pm$12.5 & 326.2$\pm$5.8 & 0.26$\pm$0.02 & 0.39$\pm$0.05 & 53,9\
` 14422885+4150321` & ` NGC5739 ` & 051316 & 55333.119 & 34 & 2.0 & 5392.0$\pm$13.8 & 317.9$\pm$5.8 & 0.28$\pm$0.02 & 0.41$\pm$0.05 & 43,8\
` 14422885+4150321` & ` NGC5739 ` & 051317 & 55333.130 & 34 & 2.0 & 5394.3$\pm$14.0 & 317.7$\pm$6.0 & 0.24$\pm$0.02 & 0.37$\pm$0.04 & 50,9\
` 14445600+0157170` & ` NGC5746 ` & 341203 & 56316.492 & 195 & 1.0 & 1665.5$\pm$13.5 & 190.0$\pm$6.3 & 0.12$\pm$0.06 & 0.38$\pm$0.25 & 25,2\
` 14454510+5134509` & ` PGC052708 ` & 163569 & 55983.337 & 70 & 2.0 & 8778.7$\pm$14.0 & 204.9$\pm$11.4 & -0.03$\pm$0.01 & 0.13$\pm$0.09 & 150,9\
` 14461110-0013229` & ` NGC5750 ` & 351847 & 56450.239 & 255 & 1.0 & 1623.7$\pm$14.4 & 106.0$\pm$6.3 & 0.14$\pm$0.03 & 1.18$\pm$0.37 & 36,1\
` 14505151+0506522` & ` NGC5765B ` & 253124 & 56116.168 & 174 & 1.0 & 8127.8$\pm$10.8 & 133.1$\pm$12.4 & -0.19$\pm$0.00 & 0.84$\pm$0.00 & 313,74\
` 14505151+0506522` & ` NGC5765B ` & 253158 & 56121.149 & 170 & 1.0 & 8127.8$\pm$12.8 & 129.2$\pm$13.5 & -0.18$\pm$0.00 & 0.85$\pm$0.00 & 341,63\
` 14535765+0332401` & ` NGC5775 ` & 144244 & 55656.429 & 216 & 2.0 & 1628.0$\pm$14.0 & 105.7$\pm$19.6 & -0.24$\pm$0.03 & 0.09$\pm$0.13 & 40,5\
` 14555524+1151407` & ` UGC09602 ` & 142198 & 55598.439 & 127 & 2.0 & 9306.3$\pm$13.4 & 286.7$\pm$7.4 & 0.28$\pm$0.15 & - & 9,0\
` 14570066+2437026` & ` UGC09618 ` & 163118 & 55972.399 & 185 & 2.0 & 9943.4$\pm$18.7 & 80.0$\pm$40.2 & -0.12$\pm$0.02 & 0.27$\pm$0.08 & 67,7\
` 14582270-0105278` & ` NGC5792 ` & 142834 & 55617.431 & 181 & 2.0 & 1838.0$\pm$13.7 & 112.6$\pm$14.9 & -0.37$\pm$0.01 & -0.30$\pm$0.04 & 110,12\
` 14583982+5353100` & ` NGC5820 ` & 252911 & 56103.263 & 270 & 1.0 & 3215.3$\pm$13.5 & 180.6$\pm$5.4 & 0.25$\pm$0.15 & - & 8,0\
` 15005570-0727263` & ` NGC5812 ` & 142496 & 55608.497 & 270 & 2.0 & 1855.7$\pm$13.4 & 225.4$\pm$7.5 & -0.37$\pm$0.15 & 0.21$\pm$0.29 & 3,1\
` 15005570-0727263` & ` NGC5812 ` & 142592 & 55611.492 & 90 & 2.0 & 1880.2$\pm$13.6 & 213.3$\pm$8.1 & -0.40$\pm$0.14 & -0.60$\pm$0.14 & 2,3\
` 15021965+0538479` & ` UGC09667 ` & 141714 & 55580.521 & 90 & 2.0 & 10660.6$\pm$22.7 & 198.7$\pm$34.7 & 0.30$\pm$0.29 & - & 4,1\
` 15021965+0538479` & ` UGC09667 ` & 142495 & 55608.426 & 90 & 2.0 & 10685.5$\pm$14.1 & 251.3$\pm$10.2 & 0.39$\pm$0.11 & - & 9,0\
` 15060078+0138017` & ` NGC5845 ` & 342036 & 56343.442 & 145 & 1.0 & 1437.2$\pm$13.0 & 248.3$\pm$3.8 & - & - & 0,1\
` 15062956+5545479` & ` NGC5866 ` & 260021 & 56144.143 & 303 & 1.0 & 728.0$\pm$14.7 & 135.7$\pm$8.5 & 0.07$\pm$0.06 & - & 30,0\
` 15065641+1250485` & ` NGC5852 ` & 152416 & 55777.148 & 305 & 2.0 & 6583.0$\pm$14.4 & 223.7$\pm$7.3 & 0.13$\pm$0.01 & 0.25$\pm$0.02 & 113,15\
` 15091320+5231418` & ` NGC5875 ` & 150254 & 55690.186 & 140 & 1.0 & 3448.6$\pm$14.6 & 105.2$\pm$10.0 & 0.05$\pm$0.01 & 0.79$\pm$0.02 & 323,32\
` 15094675+5700007` & ` NGC5879 ` & 351385 & 56430.165 & -15 & 1.0 & 733.3$\pm$13.7 & 66.0$\pm$13.9 & 0.07$\pm$0.04 & 0.51$\pm$0.20 & 35,3\
` 15105568-1128477` & ` NGC5872 ` & 351456 & 56432.252 & 190 & 1.0 & 7361.6$\pm$11.8 & 331.0$\pm$7.6 & 0.36$\pm$0.07 & 0.64$\pm$0.33 & 17,2\
` 15105610+0544416` & ` IC1101 ` & 143288 & 55629.381 & 225 & 2.0 & 22442.3$\pm$22.7 & 376.1$\pm$21.0 & - & - & 0,0\
` 15105610+0544416` & ` IC1101 ` & 341485 & 56329.453 & 195 & 1.0 & 22500.3$\pm$23.9 & 350.1$\pm$21.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 15150414-1005101` & ` NGC5885 ` & 351846 & 56450.220 & 165 & 1.0 & 1947.8$\pm$13.9 & 85.3$\pm$15.1 & -0.41$\pm$0.02 & -0.21$\pm$0.12 & 60,5\
` 15152332+5531015` & ` NGC5905 ` & 251380 & 56037.450 & 385 & 1.0 & 3329.2$\pm$11.4 & 115.1$\pm$9.4 & -0.36$\pm$0.01 & -0.27$\pm$0.03 & 176,17\
` 15152332+5531015` & ` NGC5905 ` & 252912 & 56103.280 & 385 & 1.0 & 3325.2$\pm$13.9 & 96.7$\pm$8.1 & -0.36$\pm$0.01 & -0.27$\pm$0.02 & 195,24\
` 15164448+0701180` & ` UGC09799 ` & 143924 & 55647.338 & 136 & 2.0 & 10116.9$\pm$12.8 & 217.6$\pm$11.0 & 0.31$\pm$0.02 & 0.50$\pm$0.04 & 62,10\
` 15174176-0042175` & ` b19 ` & 250520 & 56010.377 & 90 & 1.0 & 32924.3$\pm$18.1 & 376.1$\pm$17.1 & - & - & -\
` 15192473+2053465` & ` NGC5910 ` & 152346 & 55775.167 & 220 & 2.0 & 11863.6$\pm$13.5 & 277.8$\pm$7.7 & 0.36$\pm$0.08 & 0.00$\pm$0.18 & 18,5\
` 15215656+0504139` & ` NGC5921 ` & 351666 & 56445.157 & 181 & 1.0 & 1439.9$\pm$13.1 & 82.5$\pm$8.4 & 0.03$\pm$0.00 & 0.30$\pm$0.00 & 68,6\
` 15232013-0409057` & ` PGC054944 ` & 150303 & 55692.296 & 215 & 1.0 & 1941.7$\pm$15.8 & 27.5$\pm$29.3 & -0.40$\pm$0.02 & -0.11$\pm$0.16 & 43,6\
` 15253931+2936129` & ` PGC055060 ` & 162766 & 55959.450 & 30 & 2.0 & 16242.9$\pm$13.4 & 359.5$\pm$7.7 & - & - & 0,2\
` 15325288+0028079` & ` PGC055376 ` & 142909 & 55618.454 & 80 & 2.0 & 11548.6$\pm$14.0 & 278.2$\pm$7.3 & 0.23$\pm$0.62 & - & 3,0\
` 15340245+5641081` & ` NGC5965 ` & 351493 & 56433.358 & 400 & 1.0 & 3318.7$\pm$12.9 & 211.0$\pm$8.1 & 0.33$\pm$0.16 & - & 9,1\
` 15355825-0936280` & ` PGC3093250 ` & 252846 & 56101.182 & 255 & 1.0 & 7052.2$\pm$13.5 & 211.4$\pm$6.7 & 0.24$\pm$0.23 & 0.11$\pm$0.39 & 7,3\
` 15362775+2230011` & ` UGC09927 ` & 152417 & 55777.167 & 290 & 1.0 & 4252.4$\pm$12.1 & 133.8$\pm$5.5 & 0.38$\pm$0.21 & - & 3,0\
` 15372289+2032593` & ` UGC09937 ` & 152384 & 55776.170 & 195 & 2.0 & 4397.8$\pm$14.4 & 211.1$\pm$8.5 & 0.26$\pm$0.06 & - & 11,0\
` 15383977+5921212` & ` NGC5982 ` & 141713 & 55580.504 & 105 & 2.0 & 2881.9$\pm$14.2 & 260.2$\pm$7.7 & 0.53$\pm$0.39 & - & 2,0\
` 15383977+5921212` & ` NGC5982 ` & 142591 & 55611.433 & 105 & 2.0 & 2879.6$\pm$13.5 & 267.3$\pm$6.3 & 0.01$\pm$0.09 & -0.38$\pm$0.12 & 5,5\
` 15384478-0322477` & ` PGC055679 ` & 143130 & 55623.476 & 150 & 2.0 & 7005.7$\pm$14.1 & 154.8$\pm$12.3 & -0.16$\pm$0.00 & 0.37$\pm$0.01 & 185,28\
` 15390769+4351549` & ` UGC09959 ` & 352064 & 56459.331 & 305 & 1.0 & 5625.8$\pm$17.2 & 104.0$\pm$21.8 & -0.34$\pm$0.01 & -0.55$\pm$0.12 & 98,5\
` 15393904+2146579` & ` UGC09958 ` & 152347 & 55775.186 & 275 & 2.0 & 12257.2$\pm$15.0 & 299.0$\pm$10.0 & -0.42$\pm$0.70 & - & 6,1\
` 15461637+0224558` & ` NGC5990 ` & 142258 & 55600.494 & 105 & 2.0 & 3763.8$\pm$14.4 & 159.1$\pm$11.6 & -0.10$\pm$0.00 & 0.45$\pm$0.01 & 137,27\
` 15502269+1856207` & ` NGC6004 ` & 252913 & 56103.299 & 200 & 1.0 & 3766.4$\pm$11.5 & 97.7$\pm$9.5 & -0.18$\pm$0.01 & -0.18$\pm$0.12 & 97,5\
` 15525603+2106017` & ` NGC6008 ` & 352407 & 56480.256 & 250 & 1.0 & 4800.0$\pm$12.6 & 76.8$\pm$11.2 & 0.27$\pm$0.06 & 1.06$\pm$0.72 & 20,1\
` 15554330+4752024` & ` UGC10097 ` & 144506 & 55670.277 & 130 & 2.0 & 5866.7$\pm$14.8 & 325.1$\pm$6.7 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & 0.65$\pm$0.15 & 24,3\
` 15562359+1631246` & ` PGC056437 ` & 352063 & 56459.313 & 220 & 1.0 & 4691.9$\pm$11.5 & 145.7$\pm$7.1 & - & - & 1,3\
` 15570299+4810063` & ` IC1153 ` & 163405 & 55979.418 & 165 & 2.0 & 5834.7$\pm$15.6 & 236.9$\pm$8.0 & 0.35$\pm$0.07 & - & 16,0\
` 16013617+1221366` & ` PGC056722 ` & 141781 & 55583.530 & 95 & 2.0 & 10351.1$\pm$14.6 & 301.7$\pm$8.5 & - & - & 0,1\
` 16023915+0221098` & ` b15 ` & 252518 & 56088.182 & 235 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 16042798-0207153` & ` NGC6033 ` & 142837 & 55617.486 & 110 & 2.0 & 9102.9$\pm$14.4 & 262.6$\pm$8.5 & - & - & 0,2\
` 16043073+0352069` & ` NGC6036 ` & 151186 & 55722.310 & 145 & 2.0 & 5503.5$\pm$12.1 & 228.7$\pm$6.7 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & 0.88$\pm$0.17 & 29,2\
` 16045670+2355583` & ` NGC6051 ` & 142257 & 55600.473 & 181 & 2.0 & 9414.8$\pm$15.5 & 287.3$\pm$10.6 & -0.36$\pm$0.43 & -0.19$\pm$0.67 & 2,2\
` 16064207+1619111` & ` UGC10204 ` & 253402 & 56131.219 & 300 & 1.0 & 10801.8$\pm$13.9 & 245.1$\pm$4.7 & - & - & 0,0\
` 16115816+2950186` & ` UGC10262 ` & 252463 & 56086.374 & 220 & 1.0 & 14687.5$\pm$19.7 & 350.4$\pm$15.4 & - & - & 0,2\
` 16123554+2929054` & ` NGC6086 ` & 163053 & 55971.445 & 175 & 2.0 & 9386.2$\pm$14.8 & 319.6$\pm$8.2 & - & -0.83$\pm$0.28 & 1,2\
` 16142480-0012271` & ` UGC10288 ` & 352057 & 56459.191 & 91 & 1.0 & 2008.7$\pm$17.9 & 64.3$\pm$29.4 & -0.25$\pm$0.13 & - & 12,0\
` 16171575-1143543` & ` PGC057723 ` & 351781 & 56448.258 & 240 & 1.0 & 926.9$\pm$24.3 & 29.9$\pm$38.4 & -0.43$\pm$0.00 & -0.53$\pm$0.00 & 14,1\
` 16171575-1143543` & ` PGC057723 ` & 351848 & 56450.258 & 240 & 1.0 & 930.5$\pm$19.9 & 81.5$\pm$34.8 & -0.47$\pm$0.00 & -0.49$\pm$0.00 & 20,2\
` 16191155+5759028` & ` NGC6125 ` & 142699 & 55615.445 & 40 & 2.0 & 4649.4$\pm$13.1 & 263.4$\pm$5.8 & - & - & 0,0\
` 16191155+5759028` & ` NGC6128 ` & 252405 & 56084.359 & 400 & 1.0 & 4644.2$\pm$15.5 & 265.4$\pm$4.5 & - & - & 0,0\
` 16200955+3747535` & ` NGC6122 ` & 150189 & 55688.446 & 335 & 2.0 & 9841.4$\pm$13.3 & 217.0$\pm$9.3 & 0.35$\pm$0.18 & - & 8,0\
` 16214862-0217003` & ` NGC6118 ` & 351713 & 56447.300 & 200 & 1.0 & 1527.0$\pm$13.8 & 49.5$\pm$20.6 & -0.41$\pm$0.00 & -0.43$\pm$0.00 & 30,2\
` 16251032+4053338` & ` NGC6146 ` & 252293 & 56079.166 & 85 & 1.0 & 8654.2$\pm$16.3 & 310.8$\pm$6.4 & 0.17$\pm$0.05 & - & 21,1\
` 16283827+3933049` & ` NGC6166 ` & 060245 & 55421.197 & 210 & 2.0 & 9103.1$\pm$15.5 & 278.6$\pm$11.3 & 0.28$\pm$0.07 & 0.06$\pm$0.22 & 14,5\
` 16283827+3933049` & ` NGC6166 ` & 060246 & 55421.211 & 210 & 2.0 & 9101.3$\pm$17.4 & 282.7$\pm$14.0 & 0.31$\pm$0.06 & -0.17$\pm$0.19 & 13,4\
` 16375395+3604233` & ` NGC6196 ` & 051353 & 55333.435 & 320 & 2.0 & 9161.2$\pm$14.3 & 318.2$\pm$6.1 & -0.26$\pm$0.22 & - & 3,0\
` 16375395+3604233` & ` NGC6196 ` & 051354 & 55333.448 & 320 & 2.0 & 9160.1$\pm$15.2 & 309.6$\pm$7.2 & -0.24$\pm$0.69 & - & 2,0\
` 16375395+3604233` & ` NGC6196 ` & 051438 & 55337.416 & 320 & 2.0 & 9180.8$\pm$13.7 & 322.7$\pm$5.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 16375395+3604233` & ` NGC6196 ` & 051439 & 55337.431 & 320 & 2.0 & 9178.2$\pm$14.3 & 319.7$\pm$5.3 & -0.09$\pm$0.33 & - & 3,0\
` 16375395+3604233` & ` NGC6196 ` & 051936 & 55362.356 & 320 & 2.0 & 9174.7$\pm$14.1 & 320.7$\pm$5.1 & -0.19$\pm$0.48 & -0.86$\pm$0.24 & 1,2\
` 16375395+3604233` & ` NGC6196 ` & 051937 & 55362.367 & 320 & 2.0 & 9171.8$\pm$15.3 & 324.5$\pm$5.8 & - & - & 0,2\
` 16400325+1553004` & ` PGC058719 ` & 351025 & 56419.265 & 50 & 1.0 & 10580.3$\pm$12.2 & 168.4$\pm$6.9 & 0.09$\pm$0.02 & 0.40$\pm$0.11 & 58,6\
` 16430375+3649567` & ` NGC6207 ` & 144336 & 55659.318 & 20 & 1.0 & 808.4$\pm$15.1 & 30.0$\pm$24.1 & -0.44$\pm$0.00 & -0.21$\pm$0.00 & 40,7\
` 16430375+3649567` & ` NGC6207 ` & 144337 & 55659.329 & 20 & 1.0 & 805.3$\pm$15.5 & 22.3$\pm$27.6 & -0.43$\pm$0.00 & -0.29$\pm$0.00 & 22,5\
` 16430433+6134441` & ` NGC6223 ` & 142700 & 55615.475 & 90 & 2.0 & 5719.6$\pm$14.3 & 293.0$\pm$6.0 & 0.47$\pm$0.19 & - & 5,0\
` 16474706-0712456` & ` PGC1022704 ` & 350069 & 56388.425 & 155 & 1.0 & 8348.1$\pm$13.0 & 169.9$\pm$7.2 & 0.38$\pm$0.13 & - & 11,0\
` 16500502+4244234` & ` NGC6239 ` & 351670 & 56445.393 & 295 & 1.0 & 890.3$\pm$20.8 & 59.1$\pm$32.9 & -0.72$\pm$0.01 & 0.47$\pm$0.02 & 61,41\
` 16522982+6030524` & ` NGC6258 ` & 351782 & 56448.371 & 245 & 1.0 & 3047.8$\pm$13.4 & 142.3$\pm$5.3 & 0.37$\pm$0.34 & - & 8,0\
` 16535220+3945369` & ` UGC10599 ` & 141865 & 55585.525 & 25 & 2.0 & 9934.1$\pm$15.2 & 331.0$\pm$11.3 & 0.41$\pm$0.06 & 0.33$\pm$0.16 & 15,4\
` 16535220+3945369` & ` UGC10599 ` & 143494 & 55632.404 & 175 & 2.0 & 9888.0$\pm$13.6 & 384.3$\pm$11.2 & 0.25$\pm$0.05 & 0.08$\pm$0.11 & 24,6\
` 16535220+3945369` & ` UGC10599 ` & 351279 & 56428.240 & 181 & 1.0 & 9955.3$\pm$14.5 & 430.3$\pm$11.3 & 0.32$\pm$0.05 & 0.30$\pm$0.14 & 25,4\
` 16535220+3945369` & ` UGC10599 ` & 351339 & 56429.240 & 181 & 1.0 & 9922.3$\pm$16.4 & 364.2$\pm$9.7 & 0.39$\pm$0.11 & 0.63$\pm$0.54 & 16,2\
` 16535220+3945369` & ` UGC10599 ` & 352066 & 56459.370 & 361 & 1.0 & 9925.4$\pm$16.5 & 382.3$\pm$11.6 & 0.16$\pm$0.04 & -0.07$\pm$0.10 & 27,6\
` 16550959+2639463` & ` IC4630 ` & 343029 & 56377.369 & 190 & 1.0 & 10141.1$\pm$15.9 & 218.3$\pm$9.6 & 0.30$\pm$0.06 & - & 22,1\
` 16575809+2751157` & ` NGC6269 ` & 252538 & 56089.380 & 255 & 1.0 & 10277.0$\pm$16.1 & 322.8$\pm$7.1 & 0.58$\pm$0.19 & - & 7,0\
` 17032234+1214474` & ` PGC059512 ` & 350869 & 56413.298 & 75 & 1.0 & 9014.2$\pm$14.2 & 170.5$\pm$5.3 & 0.62$\pm$0.08 & - & 10,0\
` 17122865-0907269` & ` PGC2817045 ` & 350336 & 56394.441 & 181 & 1.0 & 8582.3$\pm$17.2 & 218.5$\pm$14.1 & -0.02$\pm$0.10 & - & 17,1\
` 17125383-0718146` & ` PGC1021213 ` & 260061 & 56146.142 & 215 & 1.0 & 7219.0$\pm$26.4 & 117.0$\pm$26.9 & -0.18$\pm$0.33 & - & 10,1\
` 17131806+4346563` & ` NGC6323 ` & 251411 & 56038.300 & 1 & 1.0 & 7694.7$\pm$10.8 & 144.2$\pm$6.6 & 0.10$\pm$0.01 & 1.06$\pm$0.05 & 101,13\
` 17141500+4341050` & ` NGC6329 ` & 061675 & 55481.079 & 277 & 2.0 & 8122.8$\pm$12.6 & 295.7$\pm$11.1 & 0.22$\pm$0.42 & -0.51$\pm$0.39 & 2,2\
` 17175302+6146505` & ` NGC6359 ` & 142771 & 55616.483 & -40 & 2.0 & 2995.4$\pm$13.3 & 230.4$\pm$6.4 & 0.05$\pm$0.19 & 0.14$\pm$0.18 & 4,3\
` 17180181+5014499` & ` PGC060030 ` & 343094 & 56380.376 & 100 & 1.0 & 9873.0$\pm$15.5 & 273.3$\pm$8.2 & - & - & 0,5\
` 17192134+4902256` & ` UGC10814 ` & 252539 & 56089.398 & 335 & 1.0 & 7189.4$\pm$13.0 & 197.5$\pm$10.4 & 0.07$\pm$0.05 & 0.30$\pm$0.19 & 45,5\
` 17223993+3052521` & ` MRK0506 ` & 252561 & 56090.183 & 135 & 1.0 & 12674.9$\pm$38.3 & 200.0$\pm$33.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 17243782-0243062` & ` PGC1084539 ` & 350954 & 56417.432 & 245 & 1.0 & 9788.0$\pm$28.5 & 334.1$\pm$28.3 & -0.50$\pm$0.25 & - & 5,0\
` 17322430+0703369` & ` NGC6384 ` & 251055 & 56024.391 & 192 & 1.0 & 1609.8$\pm$20.1 & 154.6$\pm$20.0 & 0.08$\pm$0.32 & - & 4,0\
` 17340802+0631053` & ` PGC1302291 ` & 150220 & 55689.459 & 270 & 2.0 & 6659.2$\pm$16.0 & 51.8$\pm$42.6 & -0.46$\pm$0.01 & -0.43$\pm$0.05 & 65,8\
` 17361111+0828558` & ` PGC1347752 ` & 253280 & 56123.281 & 230 & 1.0 & 10768.8$\pm$12.5 & 224.5$\pm$8.5 & 0.35$\pm$0.15 & 0.78$\pm$0.50 & 8,2\
` 17361220-0719287` & ` PGC200524 ` & 260062 & 56146.160 & 119 & 2.0 & 7003.9$\pm$21.5 & 232.1$\pm$27.3 & -0.29$\pm$0.10 & - & 12,1\
` 17405482+3843560` & ` ARK525 ` & 351193 & 56425.267 & 160 & 1.0 & 11859.2$\pm$15.0 & 220.7$\pm$8.9 & -0.31$\pm$0.02 & -0.27$\pm$0.05 & 108,9\
` 17492651+7008396` & ` NGC6503 ` & 252484 & 56087.351 & 301 & 1.0 & -18.0$\pm$14.6 & 28.2$\pm$25.3 & -0.13$\pm$0.02 & 0.41$\pm$0.18 & 47,4\
` 17494097+5333541` & ` PGC060936 ` & 151638 & 55737.362 & 330 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 17494650+7201162` & ` NGC6508 ` & 150188 & 55688.420 & 405 & 2.0 & 7462.3$\pm$15.0 & 279.8$\pm$6.7 & -0.07$\pm$0.11 & - & 7,1\
` 17503509-0139063` & ` PGC166871 ` & 143754 & 55640.498 & 210 & 2.0 & 7075.0$\pm$20.3 & 206.8$\pm$21.2 & 0.19$\pm$0.19 & - & 7,1\
` 17503509-0139063` & ` PGC166871 ` & 143925 & 55647.472 & 210 & 2.0 & 7081.0$\pm$13.8 & 239.2$\pm$13.7 & 0.05$\pm$0.15 & - & 10,0\
` 17514880+2304190` & ` NGC6482 ` & 051930 & 55362.180 & 68 & 2.0 & 3843.6$\pm$13.4 & 315.6$\pm$5.4 & 0.40$\pm$0.03 & 0.71$\pm$0.25 & 20,1\
` 17514880+2304190` & ` NGC6482 ` & 051931 & 55362.191 & 68 & 2.0 & 3835.5$\pm$14.9 & 318.6$\pm$5.6 & 0.37$\pm$0.03 & 0.37$\pm$0.10 & 22,3\
` 17514880+2304190` & ` NGC6482 ` & 051986 & 55363.397 & 248 & 2.0 & 3696.1$\pm$18.5 & 303.3$\pm$19.5 & - & - & 2,1\
` 17514880+2304190` & ` NGC6482 ` & 051987 & 55363.408 & 248 & 2.0 & 3722.9$\pm$20.3 & 292.8$\pm$19.0 & -0.39$\pm$0.53 & - & 3,0\
` 17514880+2304190` & ` NGC6482 ` & 052210 & 55392.323 & 248 & 2.0 & 3708.6$\pm$18.4 & 309.9$\pm$16.8 & -1.38$\pm$0.82 & - & 1,0\
` 17514880+2304190` & ` NGC6482 ` & 052211 & 55392.334 & 248 & 2.0 & 3736.0$\pm$24.9 & 271.7$\pm$19.7 & -0.88$\pm$0.89 & - & 2,0\
` 17524182+2950193` & ` NGC6487 ` & 052337 & 55398.316 & 258 & 2.0 & 7511.0$\pm$15.9 & 285.4$\pm$9.6 & - & -0.36$\pm$0.41 & 1,2\
` 17524182+2950193` & ` NGC6487 ` & 060250 & 55421.243 & 200 & 2.0 & 7510.5$\pm$13.7 & 286.1$\pm$5.5 & -0.31$\pm$0.21 & -0.22$\pm$0.26 & 3,4\
` 17524182+2950193` & ` NGC6487 ` & 060251 & 55421.254 & 200 & 2.0 & 7517.5$\pm$13.8 & 280.6$\pm$5.7 & 0.33$\pm$0.20 & 0.31$\pm$0.33 & 4,2\
` 17545074+1819367` & ` NGC6495 ` & 253281 & 56123.318 & 265 & 1.0 & 3128.2$\pm$13.1 & 225.0$\pm$5.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 17545181+3446343` & ` UGC11041 ` & 151269 & 55724.192 & 70 & 2.0 & 4801.9$\pm$14.7 & 146.3$\pm$26.6 & -0.35$\pm$0.01 & -0.41$\pm$0.08 & 63,4\
` 17554844+6236435` & ` NGC6521 ` & 144291 & 55657.427 & -10 & 2.0 & 8116.7$\pm$15.7 & 263.7$\pm$10.2 & 0.57$\pm$0.03 & 1.19$\pm$0.10 & 39,5\
` 17555979+1820178` & ` NGC6500 ` & 351626 & 56444.439 & 220 & 1.0 & 2950.7$\pm$11.5 & 219.8$\pm$4.1 & -0.08$\pm$0.00 & 0.28$\pm$0.01 & 147,32\
` 17561443+4759104` & ` PGC2308263 ` & 250168 & 55999.454 & 5 & 1.0 & 15036.1$\pm$23.8 & 276.0$\pm$22.5 & - & - & 0,9\
` 17565502+3238117` & ` UGC11058 ` & 151647 & 55738.153 & 35 & 1.0 & 4691.2$\pm$13.5 & 54.5$\pm$20.4 & -0.42$\pm$0.03 & -0.52$\pm$0.25 & 36,3\
` 17565663+2401022` & ` PGC061152 ` & 343095 & 56380.396 & 45 & 1.0 & 5853.4$\pm$24.5 & 115.5$\pm$27.6 & -0.04$\pm$0.02 & 0.14$\pm$0.11 & 111,6\
` 17571064+2757411` & ` UGC11060 ` & 151667 & 55738.380 & 305 & 2.0 & 4583.5$\pm$14.1 & 168.1$\pm$11.1 & -0.29$\pm$0.02 & -0.26$\pm$0.10 & 61,4\
` 17571493+1210463` & ` UGC11057 ` & 352041 & 56458.387 & 270 & 1.0 & 2810.8$\pm$16.2 & 79.8$\pm$21.7 & -0.38$\pm$0.12 & - & 13,1\
` 17571493+1210463` & ` UGC11057 ` & 352067 & 56459.390 & 270 & 1.0 & 2811.6$\pm$14.8 & 60.7$\pm$22.9 & -0.27$\pm$0.05 & 0.31$\pm$0.32 & 24,2\
` 17591469+4553134` & ` NGC6524 ` & 150994 & 55712.240 & 165 & 2.0 & 5689.6$\pm$13.9 & 154.9$\pm$13.2 & -0.36$\pm$0.01 & -0.33$\pm$0.04 & 95,10\
` 18000551+2621597` & ` UGC11082 ` & 142910 & 55618.478 & 175 & 2.0 & 4623.4$\pm$14.1 & 246.8$\pm$10.4 & 0.25$\pm$0.04 & 0.49$\pm$0.25 & 29,2\
` 18015166+0658057` & ` UGC11093 ` & 351784 & 56448.412 & 185 & 1.0 & 1932.8$\pm$34.2 & 93.2$\pm$57.3 & -0.42$\pm$0.04 & - & 24,1\
` 18032745-0017427` & ` PGC061331 ` & 351721 & 56447.396 & 265 & 1.0 & 7252.6$\pm$16.5 & 347.4$\pm$12.6 & - & - & 0,1\
` 18055923+1835139` & ` NGC6548 ` & 150580 & 55701.277 & 160 & 2.0 & 2168.3$\pm$16.8 & 171.8$\pm$9.5 & 0.30$\pm$0.12 & - & 7,1\
` 18065063+6949275` & ` UGC11130 ` & 252331 & 56080.363 & 425 & 1.0 & 14846.5$\pm$21.1 & 247.0$\pm$25.3 & - & - & 0,9\
` 18105749+3106584` & ` NGC6575 ` & 150263 & 55690.301 & 55 & 2.0 & 6753.7$\pm$13.3 & 259.7$\pm$7.4 & 0.76$\pm$0.63 & -0.10$\pm$0.40 & 1,2\
` 18110729+1405352` & ` NGC6570 ` & 152245 & 55769.279 & 300 & 1.0 & 2222.9$\pm$12.8 & 50.0$\pm$21.9 & -0.38$\pm$0.02 & -0.41$\pm$0.12 & 67,5\
` 18115122+1458542` & ` NGC6574 ` & 144339 & 55659.383 & 165 & 2.0 & 2223.9$\pm$13.1 & 139.5$\pm$12.9 & -0.22$\pm$0.02 & 0.82$\pm$0.06 & 62,7\
` 18123700+2532123` & ` UGC11156 ` & 151777 & 55741.384 & 215 & 2.0 & 4586.2$\pm$12.7 & 165.7$\pm$7.7 & 1.29$\pm$0.81 & - & 1,1\
` 18125527+6821484` & ` NGC6621 ` & 252451 & 56085.355 & -50 & 1.0 & 6023.4$\pm$16.8 & 150.3$\pm$19.6 & -0.32$\pm$0.01 & -0.34$\pm$0.07 & 124,8\
` 18135090+1849312` & ` NGC6587 ` & 051897 & 55361.405 & 200 & 2.0 & 3012.5$\pm$13.7 & 327.3$\pm$6.5 & -0.90$\pm$0.31 & -0.35$\pm$0.18 & 2,2\
` 18135090+1849312` & ` NGC6587 ` & 051898 & 55361.417 & 200 & 2.0 & 3014.1$\pm$13.8 & 324.2$\pm$5.9 & -0.77$\pm$0.25 & -0.35$\pm$0.22 & 2,2\
` 18135090+1849312` & ` NGC6587 ` & 051979 & 55363.197 & 200 & 2.0 & 3009.5$\pm$13.2 & 331.1$\pm$6.6 & -0.89$\pm$0.41 & -0.30$\pm$0.18 & 2,2\
` 18135090+1849312` & ` NGC6587 ` & 051980 & 55363.208 & 200 & 2.0 & 3003.4$\pm$14.1 & 325.7$\pm$5.4 & -1.13$\pm$0.42 & -0.59$\pm$0.16 & 1,2\
` 18135090+1849312` & ` NGC6587 ` & 052299 & 55397.315 & 200 & 2.0 & 3022.7$\pm$14.0 & 335.9$\pm$4.7 & 0.66$\pm$0.12 & - & 3,0\
` 18135090+1849312` & ` NGC6587 ` & 052300 & 55397.327 & 200 & 2.0 & 3020.7$\pm$13.6 & 337.1$\pm$5.3 & -0.49$\pm$0.20 & -0.84$\pm$0.19 & 3,2\
` 18142795-0225052` & ` PGC140814 ` & 150011 & 55684.402 & 145 & 2.0 & 1709.1$\pm$27.7 & 222.4$\pm$38.0 & -0.21$\pm$0.11 & 0.19$\pm$0.61 & 23,1\
` 18183348+1315541` & ` NGC6615 ` & 152157 & 55761.319 & 255 & 2.0 & 2739.6$\pm$11.7 & 190.5$\pm$9.0 & -0.69$\pm$0.39 & -0.14$\pm$0.23 & 1,1\
` 18185554+2339201` & ` NGC6619 ` & 253226 & 56122.342 & 286 & 1.0 & 4916.7$\pm$12.4 & 206.0$\pm$4.5 & 0.51$\pm$0.10 & - & 11,1\
` 18194285+2342346` & ` NGC6623 ` & 153455 & 55812.195 & 270 & 2.0 & 4802.0$\pm$15.5 & 211.2$\pm$9.8 & - & - & 0,0\
` 18264978+5108211` & ` UGC11241 ` & 352069 & 56459.428 & 220 & 1.0 & 9792.0$\pm$13.3 & 118.4$\pm$8.0 & 0.22$\pm$0.06 & 0.50$\pm$0.00 & 11,1\
` 18273712+1449085` & ` NGC6635 ` & 061530 & 55478.105 & 237 & 2.0 & 5239.0$\pm$13.2 & 255.5$\pm$6.2 & -0.92$\pm$0.66 & - & 1,0\
` 18280147+1607327` & ` UGC11242 ` & 352068 & 56459.411 & 270 & 1.0 & 10265.6$\pm$15.8 & 195.9$\pm$10.5 & 0.21$\pm$0.17 & 0.09$\pm$0.31 & 11,3\
` 18282389+2244131` & ` UGC11246 ` & 151232 & 55723.220 & 160 & 2.0 & 4072.8$\pm$12.8 & 156.9$\pm$14.7 & -0.39$\pm$0.01 & -0.40$\pm$0.04 & 128,9\
` 18285975+0648277` & ` PGC166900 ` & 351030 & 56419.346 & 170 & 1.0 & 2898.8$\pm$13.9 & 234.5$\pm$5.1 & 0.02$\pm$0.16 & 0.63$\pm$0.35 & 9,2\
` 18294495+4501155` & ` PGC2257255 ` & 352058 & 56459.210 & 155 & 1.0 & -36.8$\pm$15.1 & 17.3$\pm$26.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 18335567+2253178` & ` NGC6658 ` & 152135 & 55760.345 & 185 & 2.0 & 3735.4$\pm$15.2 & 209.5$\pm$8.9 & -0.38$\pm$0.55 & - & 1,0\
` 18343666+2254347` & ` NGC6660 ` & 060895 & 55450.197 & 248 & 2.0 & 4209.3$\pm$13.1 & 221.5$\pm$7.4 & 0.25$\pm$0.04 & 0.88$\pm$0.29 & 14,1\
` 18345024+7031259` & ` NGC6690 ` & 252914 & 56103.322 & 340 & 1.0 & 449.9$\pm$19.7 & 60.5$\pm$49.6 & -0.37$\pm$0.06 & 0.45$\pm$0.25 & 17,4\
` 18350342+3241471` & ` PGC062082 ` & 260001 & 56142.301 & 260 & 1.0 & 16658.1$\pm$47.0 & 229.8$\pm$54.7 & - & - & AGN\
` 18362058+5127594` & ` UGC11298 ` & 052296 & 55397.118 & 68 & 2.0 & 10493.4$\pm$15.9 & 278.4$\pm$9.8 & - & - & 1,1\
` 18362058+5127594` & ` UGC11298 ` & 052350 & 55398.353 & 291 & 2.0 & 10462.8$\pm$15.2 & 296.1$\pm$9.2 & - & - & 0,1\
` 18363966+1943454` & ` PGC062122 ` & 252918 & 56103.406 & 200 & 1.0 & 4696.7$\pm$12.7 & 299.8$\pm$10.1 & 0.59$\pm$0.08 & - & 14,0\
` 18401982+2411599` & ` UGC11315 ` & 143308 & 55629.482 & 205 & 2.0 & 3939.8$\pm$14.1 & 225.0$\pm$7.8 & 0.07$\pm$0.03 & 0.61$\pm$0.13 & 35,4\
` 18404012+3617226` & ` NGC6688 ` & 144622 & 55674.353 & 40 & 2.0 & 5488.3$\pm$13.6 & 229.8$\pm$9.0 & 0.34$\pm$0.05 & 0.76$\pm$0.19 & 20,3\
` 18440241+4533298` & ` PGC062332 ` & 151831 & 55744.164 & 79 & 2.0 & 25818.2$\pm$12.4 & 281.6$\pm$12.3 & - & - & -\
` 18474418+2320500` & ` UGC11353 ` & 150583 & 55701.319 & 155 & 2.0 & 4139.9$\pm$14.6 & 163.7$\pm$11.7 & 0.31$\pm$0.07 & - & 11,0\
` 18490117+1919518` & ` PGC1588608 ` & 153604 & 55825.161 & 210 & 2.0 & 4701.7$\pm$14.4 & 266.6$\pm$7.8 & - & - & 0,1\
` 18530389+2750275` & ` PGC100408 ` & 261671 & 56224.089 & 260 & 1.0 & 17986.6$\pm$29.7 & 123.5$\pm$57.2 & - & - & AGN\
` 18562403+5222394` & ` NGC6732 ` & 052177 & 55391.344 & 261 & 2.0 & 7947.1$\pm$14.2 & 309.3$\pm$7.8 & 0.16$\pm$0.15 & - & 6,1\
` 18562403+5222394` & ` NGC6732 ` & 052178 & 55391.359 & 261 & 2.0 & 7960.3$\pm$12.9 & 302.8$\pm$9.1 & -0.01$\pm$0.11 & 0.09$\pm$0.18 & 7,4\
` 18562403+5222394` & ` NGC6732 ` & 052212 & 55392.353 & 261 & 2.0 & 7937.8$\pm$13.5 & 305.0$\pm$7.1 & 0.06$\pm$0.14 & 0.43$\pm$0.26 & 6,2\
` 18562403+5222394` & ` NGC6732 ` & 052213 & 55392.368 & 261 & 2.0 & 7955.1$\pm$13.5 & 313.5$\pm$7.9 & 0.12$\pm$0.11 & 0.35$\pm$0.21 & 8,3\
` 18573750+3800322` & ` PGC062613 ` & 342845 & 56370.475 & 70 & 1.0 & 16136.7$\pm$17.4 & 357.2$\pm$12.7 & - & - & 0,2\
` 18593477+1906217` & ` PGC1580722 ` & 143495 & 55632.492 & 135 & 2.0 & 4766.0$\pm$18.1 & 271.2$\pm$12.4 & -0.47$\pm$0.47 & - & 3,0\
` 18593477+1906217` & ` PGC1580722 ` & 143885 & 55646.459 & 140 & 2.0 & 4792.3$\pm$16.4 & 268.5$\pm$9.4 & - & - & 0,1\
` 19050335+5542544` & ` NGC6757 ` & 261365 & 56215.110 & 270 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 19134338+4549090` & ` PGC062931 ` & 261606 & 56222.117 & 295 & 1.0 & 12365.9$\pm$16.1 & 323.3$\pm$8.4 & 0.06$\pm$0.53 & -0.48$\pm$0.57 & 5,1\
` 19235095+5559155` & ` UGC11435 ` & 351669 & 56445.298 & 80 & 1.0 & 3623.7$\pm$33.0 & 43.2$\pm$42.3 & -0.42$\pm$0.06 & 0.05$\pm$0.44 & 15,2\
` 19310804+5406077` & ` UGC11453 ` & 351623 & 56444.299 & 75 & 1.0 & 3803.7$\pm$13.8 & 93.5$\pm$13.4 & -0.36$\pm$0.01 & -0.54$\pm$0.05 & 165,10\
` 19373299-0613046` & ` PGC090334 ` & 351416 & 56431.440 & 190 & 1.0 & 3101.2$\pm$17.2 & 90.7$\pm$48.3 & - & - & AGN\
` 19395016-0332517` & ` PGC204653 ` & 253279 & 56123.263 & 135 & 1.0 & 16153.5$\pm$18.2 & 222.1$\pm$10.9 & - & - & 0,3\
` 19414211+5037571` & ` UGC11465 ` & 351114 & 56423.360 & 160 & 1.0 & 7812.8$\pm$14.7 & 395.4$\pm$9.8 & 0.26$\pm$0.21 & 0.58$\pm$0.67 & 6,2\
` 19424057-1019255` & ` NGC6814 ` & 253441 & 56133.270 & 110 & 1.0 & 1533.6$\pm$13.6 & 101.1$\pm$16.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 19434067+5606339` & ` NGC6824 ` & 144295 & 55657.474 & 45 & 2.0 & 3466.8$\pm$13.5 & 196.3$\pm$8.6 & 0.53$\pm$0.02 & 0.85$\pm$0.14 & 39,3\
` 19485956+5018471` & ` UGC11485 ` & 253520 & 56140.373 & 220 & 1.0 & 7574.8$\pm$16.3 & 195.7$\pm$11.0 & -0.07$\pm$0.01 & -0.08$\pm$0.06 & 161,9\
` 19490928-1034253` & ` PGC090341 ` & 150811 & 55707.422 & 165 & 2.0 & 7271.8$\pm$26.5 & 105.7$\pm$55.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 19523991+5727354` & ` UGC11492 ` & 351990 & 56456.295 & 0 & 1.0 & 3523.5$\pm$13.4 & 72.7$\pm$14.5 & -0.34$\pm$0.01 & -0.21$\pm$0.05 & 112,12\
` 19561287+4026021` & ` PGC063832 ` & 144294 & 55657.456 & 140 & 2.0 & 4491.0$\pm$13.9 & 302.6$\pm$8.3 & - & - & 0,2\
` 19564921+4024402` & ` PGC063852 ` & 350953 & 56417.389 & 110 & 1.0 & 4641.5$\pm$13.4 & 272.6$\pm$6.8 & 1.00$\pm$0.51 & - & 3,0\
` 19592833+4044022` & ` PGC063932 ` & 253445 & 56133.389 & 340 & 1.0 & 16151.9$\pm$65.7 & 348.5$\pm$41.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 19592833+4044022` & ` PGC063932 ` & 262189 & 56243.090 & 340 & 1.0 & 16335.0$\pm$23.3 & 130.2$\pm$33.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 20075080+5938105` & ` PGC064144 ` & 253223 & 56122.227 & 20 & 1.0 & 11011.2$\pm$13.0 & 176.5$\pm$10.6 & -0.21$\pm$0.01 & 0.08$\pm$0.03 & 173,23\
` 20112927-0748485` & ` PGC090353 ` & 151329 & 55726.392 & 150 & 2.0 & 5657.0$\pm$15.8 & 134.9$\pm$22.1 & -0.20$\pm$0.01 & -0.13$\pm$0.07 & 97,6\
` 20183808-0009017` & ` UGC11537 ` & 351783 & 56448.392 & 80 & 1.0 & 5327.9$\pm$13.6 & 128.1$\pm$10.1 & 0.32$\pm$0.18 & - & 9,1\
` 20202850-1021209` & ` PGC979256 ` & 253225 & 56122.320 & 135 & 1.0 & 8215.0$\pm$14.0 & 270.2$\pm$8.5 & - & - & 0,1\
` 20223101+1009004` & ` PGC064562 ` & 253277 & 56123.225 & 95 & 1.0 & 5356.0$\pm$12.8 & 203.2$\pm$5.4 & 0.32$\pm$0.07 & - & 15,1\
` 20235734-0916531` & ` PGC992999 ` & 253442 & 56133.289 & 245 & 1.0 & 8236.0$\pm$15.3 & 266.1$\pm$8.9 & -0.78$\pm$0.25 & - & 3,0\
` 20241125+3551304` & ` 2M2024 ` & 253360 & 56129.417 & 245 & 1.0 & -33.6$\pm$15.3 & 33.1$\pm$21.9 & -0.35$\pm$0.03 & - & 51,0\
` 20274605-0304375` & ` NGC6915 ` & 151147 & 55719.396 & 100 & 2.0 & 5597.5$\pm$14.0 & 179.1$\pm$7.7 & 0.31$\pm$0.03 & 1.12$\pm$0.35 & 23,1\
` 20282884+2543241` & ` NGC6921 ` & 150059 & 55685.410 & 140 & 2.0 & 4210.8$\pm$13.0 & 212.5$\pm$10.3 & 0.63$\pm$0.08 & - & 16,0\
` 20325022+0955351` & ` NGC6928 ` & 150012 & 55684.440 & 104 & 2.0 & 4635.9$\pm$14.4 & 182.6$\pm$10.5 & 0.45$\pm$0.03 & - & 23,0\
` 20325594+5430316` & ` UGC11592 ` & 151119 & 55718.334 & 55 & 2.0 & 1528.1$\pm$13.3 & 134.1$\pm$11.6 & -0.25$\pm$0.34 & - & 2,0\
` 20330610-0201390` & ` NGC6926 ` & 253163 & 56121.365 & 175 & 1.0 & 5899.2$\pm$14.5 & 161.2$\pm$14.1 & 0.18$\pm$0.02 & 0.87$\pm$0.10 & 78,6\
` 20330610-0201390` & ` NGC6926 ` & 253405 & 56131.275 & 175 & 1.0 & 5914.5$\pm$21.5 & 212.2$\pm$28.6 & 0.12$\pm$0.03 & 0.88$\pm$0.16 & 53,3\
` 20353105-0245536` & ` PGC065021 ` & 150996 & 55712.414 & 245 & 2.0 & 5676.6$\pm$16.6 & 211.7$\pm$8.9 & 0.05$\pm$0.07 & - & 20,0\
` 20371407+6606203` & ` NGC6952 ` & 253282 & 56123.336 & 440 & 1.0 & 1365.9$\pm$14.3 & 115.2$\pm$6.4 & 0.42$\pm$0.01 & 0.96$\pm$0.04 & 102,6\
` 20401346+5059165` & ` PGC165861 ` & 150934 & 55710.367 & 100 & 2.0 & 2976.3$\pm$29.8 & 309.6$\pm$28.4 & -0.71$\pm$0.19 & - & 8,0\
` 20401346+5059165` & ` PGC165861 ` & 150935 & 55710.378 & 100 & 2.0 & 3013.4$\pm$37.5 & 290.6$\pm$39.5 & -0.58$\pm$0.21 & - & 6,1\
` 20432938-1005316` & ` PGC065257 ` & 261300 & 56214.086 & 270 & 1.0 & 10125.5$\pm$13.5 & 161.9$\pm$7.0 & 0.05$\pm$0.01 & 0.74$\pm$0.03 & 160,21\
` 20432938-1005316` & ` PGC065257 ` & 261363 & 56215.076 & 270 & 1.0 & 10126.8$\pm$13.4 & 167.3$\pm$7.8 & 0.07$\pm$0.01 & 0.75$\pm$0.03 & 134,17\
` 20435368+1230429` & ` NGC6956 ` & 262110 & 56240.115 & 155 & 1.0 & 4587.4$\pm$12.3 & 111.1$\pm$8.5 & -0.31$\pm$0.01 & -0.36$\pm$0.08 & 99,5\
` 20440975-1043245` & ` MRK0509 ` & 151330 & 55726.418 & 220 & 2.0 & 10041.7$\pm$0.0 & 10.3$\pm$47.5 & - & - & AGN\
` 20471908+0019150` & ` NGC6962 ` & 052351 & 55398.368 & 208 & 2.0 & 4164.9$\pm$14.6 & 207.5$\pm$9.7 & 0.14$\pm$0.06 & 0.74$\pm$0.24 & 18,2\
` 20494713+5206261` & ` 2M20494 ` & 261302 & 56214.195 & 230 & 2.0 & 3130.9$\pm$18.4 & 222.1$\pm$14.8 & -1.00$\pm$0.26 & - & 3,0\
` 20571538+2557534` & ` UGC11651 ` & 351718 & 56447.335 & 181 & 1.0 & 1458.1$\pm$24.9 & 73.7$\pm$39.6 & -0.41$\pm$0.23 & - & 6,0\
` 20575949-0430026` & ` PGC1057358 ` & 061720 & 55482.101 & 180 & 2.0 & 23775.9$\pm$15.1 & 270.9$\pm$13.2 & - & - & 0,1\
` 21033361+2953504` & ` NGC7013 ` & 252280 & 56078.361 & 181 & 1.0 & 705.1$\pm$13.5 & 106.8$\pm$6.4 & 0.16$\pm$0.04 & 0.90$\pm$0.35 & 40,1\
` 21074732+1620090` & ` NGC7025 ` & 052305 & 55397.442 & 239 & 2.0 & 4863.4$\pm$13.6 & 238.4$\pm$7.5 & 0.47$\pm$0.09 & - & 8,1\
` 21074732+1620090` & ` NGC7025 ` & 052353 & 55398.434 & 239 & 2.0 & 4882.5$\pm$13.7 & 238.9$\pm$7.6 & 0.33$\pm$0.08 & 0.47$\pm$0.16 & 10,2\
` 21074732+1620090` & ` NGC7025 ` & 052445 & 55408.411 & 239 & 2.0 & 4851.3$\pm$14.0 & 234.5$\pm$7.9 & 0.04$\pm$0.06 & 0.00$\pm$0.11 & 14,5\
` 21074732+1620090` & ` NGC7025 ` & 052446 & 55408.419 & 239 & 2.0 & 4867.0$\pm$14.1 & 229.2$\pm$11.3 & 0.29$\pm$0.15 & - & 6,0\
` 21074732+1620090` & ` NGC7025 ` & 052447 & 55408.427 & 239 & 2.0 & 4823.2$\pm$32.0 & 244.3$\pm$37.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 21090996-0940147` & ` PGC089171 ` & 151732 & 55740.402 & 115 & 2.0 & 8090.0$\pm$22.3 & 160.8$\pm$43.6 & - & - & AGN\
` 21105420-0346348` & ` PGC1067006 ` & 151124 & 55718.436 & 169 & 2.0 & 9245.1$\pm$13.4 & 186.4$\pm$11.3 & -0.03$\pm$0.18 & - & 5,0\
` 21183304+2626486` & ` NGC7052 ` & 061574 & 55479.227 & 254 & 2.0 & 4626.6$\pm$14.5 & 313.9$\pm$6.2 & 0.14$\pm$0.03 & 0.24$\pm$0.15 & 31,4\
` 21201566-0452356` & ` IC1371 ` & 061721 & 55482.116 & 195 & 2.0 & 8791.8$\pm$16.9 & 269.4$\pm$12.0 & 0.09$\pm$0.09 & -0.02$\pm$0.42 & 17,2\
` 21204248+4423590` & ` PGC066592 ` & 140051 & 55533.091 & 310 & 2.0 & 3988.2$\pm$14.4 & 198.0$\pm$9.0 & 0.37$\pm$0.06 & - & 13,1\
` 21204618+4516221` & ` PGC166712 ` & 253278 & 56123.242 & 90 & 1.0 & 181.4$\pm$62.4 & 158.0$\pm$90.1 & -0.51$\pm$0.03 & 0.41$\pm$0.24 & 26,3\
` 21210763+2305059` & ` NGC7053 ` & 140050 & 55533.074 & 205 & 2.0 & 4659.4$\pm$14.5 & 208.5$\pm$9.0 & 0.24$\pm$0.05 & 0.50$\pm$0.17 & 19,3\
` 21213904+4403499` & ` PGC066627 ` & 252868 & 56101.301 & 75 & 1.0 & 3808.3$\pm$15.0 & 253.2$\pm$8.3 & - & - & 0,1\
` 21253283+2519280` & ` PGC3089540 ` & 151291 & 55725.347 & 120 & 2.0 & 4661.8$\pm$13.7 & 162.5$\pm$9.9 & - & - & 0,0\
` 21353268+3523541` & ` IC1392 ` & 052354 & 55398.456 & 265 & 2.0 & 4319.8$\pm$14.6 & 218.9$\pm$8.2 & 0.08$\pm$0.58 & 0.37$\pm$0.51 & 1,1\
` 21362777-0953236` & ` PGC189130 ` & 253444 & 56133.340 & 235 & 1.0 & 24578.6$\pm$12.2 & 355.3$\pm$19.8 & - & - & -\
` 21383340+3205060` & ` PGC067084 ` & 252754 & 56098.323 & 145 & 1.0 & 7300.0$\pm$34.5 & 200.7$\pm$28.7 & - & - & AGN\
` 21383340+3205060` & ` PGC067084 ` & 262111 & 56240.166 & 325 & 1.0 & 7314.0$\pm$25.4 & 224.4$\pm$22.1 & - & - & AGN\
` 21383461-0754261` & ` PGC163280 ` & 151811 & 55742.420 & 182 & 2.0 & 15279.9$\pm$13.4 & 279.8$\pm$9.3 & - & - & 0,2\
` 21423859+4330562` & ` PGC165885 ` & 351168 & 56424.422 & 100 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 21424877-0652066` & ` PGC189711 ` & 262080 & 56239.052 & 110 & 1.0 & 15651.7$\pm$13.1 & 282.1$\pm$6.8 & - & - & 0,2\
` 21434945-0804261` & ` PGC2800918 ` & 153412 & 55811.232 & 182 & 2.0 & 14882.0$\pm$17.0 & 275.6$\pm$9.6 & - & - & 0,0\
` 21474092+4547394` & ` PGC167519 ` & 351720 & 56447.371 & 160 & 1.0 & 5463.4$\pm$16.4 & 267.1$\pm$9.4 & -0.02$\pm$0.24 & - & 5,0\
` 21493100-0951450` & ` PGC985487 ` & 152783 & 55796.269 & 180 & 2.0 & 23287.8$\pm$17.2 & 273.3$\pm$14.4 & - & - & 0,0\
` 21560065-0131006` & ` IC1411 ` & 151809 & 55742.388 & 200 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 21560065-0131006` & ` IC1411 ` & 151810 & 55742.402 & 200 & 2.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 21560065-0131006` & ` IC1411 ` & 152158 & 55761.336 & 179 & 2.0 & 7878.8$\pm$15.7 & 323.2$\pm$13.4 & 0.12$\pm$0.15 & 0.56$\pm$0.58 & 6,1\
` 21570253+6626098` & ` PGC2821703 ` & 352344 & 56474.379 & 305 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 22004125+1744172` & ` NGC7177 ` & 252869 & 56101.341 & 90 & 1.0 & 1098.4$\pm$13.9 & 124.4$\pm$5.2 & -0.15$\pm$0.01 & 0.13$\pm$0.05 & 68,11\
` 22025805+4103322` & ` NGC7197 ` & 140991 & 55557.053 & 285 & 2.0 & 4354.4$\pm$14.1 & 181.6$\pm$11.2 & -0.12$\pm$0.07 & 0.55$\pm$0.44 & 13,2\
` 22070282+5122417` & ` 2M22070 ` & 262241 & 56246.142 & 250 & 1.0 & 13299.0$\pm$26.1 & 338.9$\pm$24.8 & - & - & 0,0\
` 22075236+3121333` & ` NGC7217 ` & 253404 & 56131.256 & 85 & 1.0 & 914.4$\pm$13.9 & 145.8$\pm$4.8 & 0.50$\pm$0.01 & 0.61$\pm$0.07 & 42,4\
` 22082737+4826268` & ` UGC11920 ` & 153351 & 55810.135 & 45 & 1.0 & 1070.5$\pm$14.0 & 153.2$\pm$4.4 & 0.20$\pm$0.03 & 0.59$\pm$0.18 & 20,2\
` 22123011+4519424` & ` NGC7231 ` & 352065 & 56459.350 & 90 & 1.0 & 1052.0$\pm$22.8 & 60.5$\pm$39.0 & -0.80$\pm$0.00 & 0.44$\pm$0.00 & 80,44\
` 22153950+3717554` & ` NGC7242 ` & 060036 & 55412.220 & 45 & 2.0 & 5787.2$\pm$12.2 & 259.5$\pm$8.0 & -0.87$\pm$0.53 & 0.18$\pm$0.67 & 1,1\
` 22153950+3717554` & ` NGC7242 ` & 060037 & 55412.232 & 45 & 2.0 & 5785.5$\pm$16.2 & 261.5$\pm$9.5 & -0.60$\pm$0.51 & - & 1,0\
` 22165396+4030083` & ` NGC7248 ` & 061483 & 55477.283 & 340 & 2.0 & 4286.3$\pm$13.7 & 269.1$\pm$5.3 & - & -0.45$\pm$0.35 & 0,2\
` 22182048+1337255` & ` PGC068534 ` & 151688 & 55739.375 & 170 & 2.0 & 7329.2$\pm$17.2 & 48.0$\pm$45.5 & -0.34$\pm$0.06 & 0.35$\pm$0.91 & 14,2\
` 22182048+1337255` & ` PGC068534 ` & 151807 & 55742.353 & 170 & 2.0 & 7289.2$\pm$17.1 & 93.1$\pm$30.3 & -0.36$\pm$0.06 & -0.13$\pm$0.30 & 15,3\
` 22182048+1337255` & ` PGC068534 ` & 151808 & 55742.368 & 170 & 2.0 & 7326.2$\pm$18.4 & 82.7$\pm$36.3 & -0.40$\pm$0.06 & - & 14,1\
` 22202270+4742212` & ` UGC11991 ` & 161376 & 55893.139 & 255 & 1.0 & 5399.4$\pm$15.4 & 81.3$\pm$22.2 & -0.34$\pm$0.10 & -0.17$\pm$0.78 & 16,1\
` 22222747+3612354` & ` NGC7265 ` & 060758 & 55445.375 & 266 & 2.0 & 4981.2$\pm$14.4 & 246.2$\pm$6.7 & 0.21$\pm$0.11 & - & 10,0\
` 22222747+3612354` & ` NGC7265 ` & 060759 & 55445.389 & 266 & 2.0 & 4994.9$\pm$14.3 & 245.9$\pm$7.5 & 0.36$\pm$0.12 & - & 8,0\
` 22231202+4003201` & ` UGC12016 ` & 140054 & 55533.140 & 300 & 2.0 & 5247.8$\pm$14.2 & 300.8$\pm$6.2 & -0.28$\pm$0.17 & - & 4,1\
` 22241107+3607330` & ` NGC7274 ` & 061582 & 55479.279 & 266 & 2.0 & 5946.5$\pm$12.5 & 288.2$\pm$7.3 & -0.08$\pm$0.15 & - & 7,1\
` 22265654+5130086` & ` PGC068890 ` & 351722 & 56447.413 & 55 & 1.0 & 10909.6$\pm$16.2 & 274.2$\pm$10.2 & 0.19$\pm$0.18 & - & 4,0\
` 22312062+3921298` & ` UGC12064 ` & 253224 & 56122.300 & -1 & 1.0 & 5004.6$\pm$13.4 & 249.0$\pm$9.4 & 0.30$\pm$0.06 & 0.67$\pm$0.36 & 27,2\
` 22330629+0805508` & ` UGC12074 ` & 352471 & 56484.336 & 145 & 1.0 & 2030.1$\pm$19.2 & 42.5$\pm$30.8 & -0.51$\pm$0.01 & -0.00$\pm$0.03 & 108,27\
` 22340676+0534131` & ` NGC7311 ` & 140285 & 55538.089 & 195 & 2.0 & 4473.5$\pm$13.2 & 201.9$\pm$7.8 & 0.50$\pm$0.07 & - & 8,0\
` 22353169+3448128` & ` NGC7315 ` & 151292 & 55725.370 & 20 & 2.0 & 6152.1$\pm$13.5 & 228.0$\pm$8.7 & - & - & 0,0\
` 22354078+0129053` & ` PGC087323 ` & 061841 & 55484.208 & 207 & 2.0 & 17018.4$\pm$16.6 & 319.3$\pm$9.2 & - & - & 0,2\
` 22365619+3832527` & ` NGC7330 ` & 153411 & 55811.150 & 70 & 2.0 & 5243.0$\pm$15.3 & 266.0$\pm$7.1 & -0.34$\pm$0.35 & - & 2,0\
` 22370410+3424573` & ` NGC7331 ` & 151293 & 55725.393 & 68 & 1.0 & 815.9$\pm$12.0 & 131.0$\pm$4.6 & 0.23$\pm$0.03 & - & 21,0\
` 22372452+2347540` & ` NGC7332 ` & 351671 & 56445.415 & 155 & 1.0 & 1158.7$\pm$14.3 & 135.8$\pm$4.4 & 0.08$\pm$0.07 & - & 6,0\
` 22401511-0225265` & ` PGC069448 ` & 352506 & 56485.374 & 245 & 1.0 & 2900.4$\pm$12.1 & 17.6$\pm$27.1 & -0.35$\pm$0.03 & -0.23$\pm$0.15 & 44,5\
` 22415367+3455106` & ` UGC12157 ` & 151277 & 55724.390 & 95 & 2.0 & 6598.5$\pm$14.3 & 303.3$\pm$8.4 & 0.16$\pm$0.05 & 0.25$\pm$0.16 & 22,3\
` 22434930+0842199` & ` NGC7362 ` & 062541 & 55504.194 & 180 & 2.0 & 7447.6$\pm$13.9 & 274.5$\pm$7.8 & -0.22$\pm$0.37 & -0.04$\pm$0.43 & 2,3\
` 22484014+5309449` & ` PGC168062 ` & 151278 & 55724.409 & 155 & 2.0 & 13187.4$\pm$21.4 & 300.8$\pm$19.8 & 0.42$\pm$0.51 & 0.14$\pm$0.99 & 5,1\
` 22484014+5309449` & ` PGC168062 ` & 151279 & 55724.421 & 155 & 2.0 & 13207.8$\pm$21.9 & 320.8$\pm$17.2 & - & -0.21$\pm$0.63 & 3,1\
` 22500213+1141555` & ` NGC7386 ` & 062169 & 55496.228 & 320 & 2.0 & 7154.3$\pm$14.4 & 301.6$\pm$6.8 & - & -0.05$\pm$0.49 & 1,2\
` 22503614-0132413` & ` NGC7391 ` & 060754 & 55445.308 & 115 & 2.0 & 2985.8$\pm$14.2 & 257.5$\pm$6.3 & 0.58$\pm$0.20 & - & 5,1\
` 22503614-0132413` & ` NGC7391 ` & 060755 & 55445.323 & 115 & 2.0 & 2976.3$\pm$14.7 & 260.0$\pm$7.7 & 0.40$\pm$0.14 & 0.97$\pm$0.38 & 7,1\
` 22510095+3122299` & ` UGC12214 ` & 151541 & 55735.370 & 155 & 2.0 & 6525.1$\pm$13.8 & 251.6$\pm$5.9 & 0.02$\pm$0.17 & - & 3,0\
` 22513158+2304499` & ` IC5258 ` & 062214 & 55497.234 & 290 & 2.0 & 7646.5$\pm$14.1 & 187.2$\pm$9.1 & - & - & 0,0\
` 22522259+0105332` & ` NGC7396 ` & 060926 & 55451.201 & 149 & 2.0 & 4831.3$\pm$13.7 & 241.7$\pm$8.3 & 0.30$\pm$0.07 & 0.85$\pm$0.33 & 17,1\
` 22535624-0634453` & ` NGC7406 ` & 160368 & 55858.152 & 255 & 1.0 & 1531.1$\pm$13.3 & 49.5$\pm$19.4 & -0.46$\pm$0.01 & -0.15$\pm$0.04 & 121,17\
` 22560284+3621411` & ` NGC7426 ` & 060845 & 55448.162 & 93 & 2.0 & 5186.1$\pm$13.9 & 295.8$\pm$7.2 & 0.29$\pm$0.03 & 0.48$\pm$0.08 & 25,4\
` 22560284+3621411` & ` NGC7426 ` & 062215 & 55497.253 & 255 & 2.0 & 5190.9$\pm$14.2 & 298.9$\pm$7.4 & 0.31$\pm$0.03 & 0.67$\pm$0.12 & 30,4\
` 22575750+2609000` & ` NGC7436 ` & 061902 & 55485.287 & 180 & 2.0 & 7218.8$\pm$13.0 & 312.8$\pm$6.4 & 0.34$\pm$0.11 & 0.44$\pm$0.34 & 6,2\
` 22580224-0346108` & ` ARP314 ` & 160369 & 55858.171 & 195 & 1.0 & 3610.1$\pm$15.7 & 74.5$\pm$17.4 & -0.26$\pm$0.00 & -0.17$\pm$0.02 & 337,29\
` 22581755+2546161` & ` UGC12272 ` & 253406 & 56131.294 & 45 & 1.0 & 7180.9$\pm$13.1 & 191.5$\pm$10.2 & 0.67$\pm$0.10 & - & 5,0\
` 22583186+1043545` & ` PGC070147 ` & 351995 & 56456.423 & 150 & 1.0 & 11494.4$\pm$14.3 & 295.9$\pm$8.0 & 0.34$\pm$0.14 & 0.64$\pm$0.30 & 9,2\
` 23005993+3008416` & ` NGC7457 ` & 151776 & 55741.364 & 125 & 1.0 & 799.4$\pm$13.4 & 66.6$\pm$9.7 & -0.96$\pm$0.89 & - & 3,0\
` 23031567+0852252` & ` NGC7469 ` & 253407 & 56131.322 & 120 & 1.0 & 4877.0$\pm$20.5 & 221.3$\pm$22.6 & - & - & AGN\
` 23031567+0852252` & ` NGC7469 ` & 260502 & 56179.201 & 120 & 1.0 & 4842.1$\pm$29.1 & 256.2$\pm$43.4 & - & - & AGN\
` 23032450+2435497` & ` PGC3089639 ` & 261439 & 56218.070 & 55 & 1.0 & 12174.5$\pm$14.3 & 218.6$\pm$7.7 & 0.22$\pm$0.15 & - & 15,1\
` 23040267+2237272` & ` MRK0315 ` & 351785 & 56448.429 & 60 & 1.0 & 11321.2$\pm$30.5 & 186.5$\pm$42.8 & - & - & AGN\
` 23060487+3406278` & ` NGC7485 ` & 151294 & 55725.410 & 145 & 2.0 & 5732.1$\pm$18.2 & 257.1$\pm$7.0 & 0.03$\pm$0.02 & 0.32$\pm$0.08 & 40,5\
` 23065893+2256113` & ` IC5285 ` & 252916 & 56103.368 & 70 & 1.0 & 6056.5$\pm$12.9 & 206.2$\pm$5.9 & 0.35$\pm$0.07 & - & 20,1\
` 23072021+3621450` & ` ARK575 ` & 340826 & 56295.080 & 355 & 1.0 & 4993.1$\pm$15.4 & 258.7$\pm$6.4 & 0.25$\pm$0.11 & 0.97$\pm$0.51 & 11,2\
` 23072021+3621450` & ` ARK575 ` & 351723 & 56447.435 & 175 & 1.0 & 5007.1$\pm$12.8 & 270.1$\pm$6.2 & 0.38$\pm$0.13 & 0.57$\pm$0.31 & 8,2\
` 23072021+3621450` & ` PGC070520 ` & 140118 & 55534.169 & 355 & 2.0 & 5016.6$\pm$14.5 & 288.2$\pm$6.8 & 0.12$\pm$0.06 & 0.51$\pm$0.16 & 18,3\
` 23072021+3621450` & ` PGC070520 ` & 252452 & 56085.407 & 175 & 1.0 & 5007.5$\pm$14.1 & 264.3$\pm$8.4 & 0.19$\pm$0.10 & 0.49$\pm$0.20 & 10,2\
` 23072515+3222303` & ` NGC7490 ` & 153215 & 55806.421 & 250 & 2.0 & 6117.2$\pm$14.9 & 162.2$\pm$12.7 & 0.27$\pm$0.08 & 0.41$\pm$0.25 & 9,1\
` 23104223+0734033` & ` NGC7503 ` & 253283 & 56123.356 & 90 & 1.0 & 12880.9$\pm$14.6 & 290.4$\pm$6.4 & 0.96$\pm$0.45 & - & 4,0\
` 23142943+2341053` & ` NGC7539 ` & 062170 & 55496.254 & 310 & 2.0 & 5915.6$\pm$14.2 & 194.0$\pm$8.9 & - & - & 0,1\
` 23151609+1857409` & ` NGC7550 ` & 153307 & 55808.399 & 330 & 2.0 & 4960.5$\pm$14.5 & 246.2$\pm$7.8 & 0.32$\pm$0.04 & 0.42$\pm$0.09 & 26,4\
` 23155750+0641149` & ` NGC7562 ` & 140286 & 55538.112 & 265 & 2.0 & 3524.6$\pm$13.7 & 247.3$\pm$6.7 & - & - & 0,1\
` 23171357+1842295` & ` NGC7578B ` & 060742 & 55445.198 & 117 & 2.0 & 11776.6$\pm$14.4 & 303.4$\pm$8.0 & 0.13$\pm$0.15 & - & 12,1\
` 23173375+2901096` & ` UGC12482 ` & 061903 & 55485.303 & 257 & 2.0 & 6849.2$\pm$13.9 & 321.6$\pm$8.3 & - & -0.12$\pm$0.50 & 0,2\
` 23175277+0722458` & ` NGC7583 ` & 261073 & 56208.130 & 75 & 1.0 & 12257.3$\pm$13.0 & 352.2$\pm$8.4 & 0.11$\pm$0.42 & -0.60$\pm$0.65 & 4,2\
` 23185137+4203550` & ` UGC12496 ` & 252917 & 56103.387 & 20 & 1.0 & 5119.3$\pm$12.8 & 160.6$\pm$6.8 & - & - & 0,0\
` 23185663+0014376` & ` NGC7603 ` & 060938 & 55451.335 & 208 & 2.0 & 8622.5$\pm$20.9 & 245.1$\pm$24.6 & - & - & AGN\
` 23192510+0554223` & ` IC1481 ` & 352345 & 56474.396 & 80 & 1.0 & 5994.6$\pm$12.2 & 110.2$\pm$15.6 & 0.11$\pm$0.01 & 0.52$\pm$0.07 & 97,7\
` 23194420+0834349` & ` NGC7612 ` & 052088 & 55371.409 & 184 & 2.0 & 3137.3$\pm$13.7 & 176.0$\pm$10.9 & - & -0.14$\pm$0.61 & 1,1\
` 23194420+0834349` & ` NGC7612 ` & 052089 & 55371.422 & 184 & 2.0 & 3148.8$\pm$14.3 & 176.6$\pm$9.2 & - & - & 0,1\
` 23194420+0834349` & ` NGC7612 ` & 052269 & 55396.341 & 184 & 2.0 & 3148.8$\pm$14.5 & 179.2$\pm$9.7 & - & - & 1,0\
` 23194420+0834349` & ` NGC7612 ` & 052270 & 55396.354 & 184 & 2.0 & 3165.4$\pm$13.9 & 179.5$\pm$10.1 & 0.10$\pm$0.30 & - & 2,0\
` 23194420+0834349` & ` NGC7612 ` & 052301 & 55397.345 & 184 & 2.0 & 3168.1$\pm$14.1 & 184.4$\pm$7.9 & - & -0.50$\pm$0.27 & 0,2\
` 23194420+0834349` & ` NGC7612 ` & 052302 & 55397.357 & 184 & 2.0 & 3168.1$\pm$14.2 & 183.4$\pm$8.3 & - & - & 0,0\
` 23194721+4251096` & ` NGC7618 ` & 061473 & 55477.094 & 10 & 2.0 & 4962.1$\pm$15.1 & 323.4$\pm$8.9 & 0.47$\pm$0.22 & 0.14$\pm$0.37 & 5,2\
` 23194721+4251096` & ` NGC7618 ` & 061651 & 55480.308 & 276 & 2.0 & 4985.6$\pm$12.0 & 333.0$\pm$8.1 & 0.25$\pm$0.09 & - & 10,1\
` 23194721+4251096` & ` NGC7618 ` & 061788 & 55483.079 & 83 & 2.0 & 4979.3$\pm$14.8 & 301.6$\pm$8.7 & 0.37$\pm$0.11 & 0.55$\pm$0.30 & 7,2\
` 23201452+0812226` & ` NGC7619 ` & 060750 & 55445.221 & 133 & 2.0 & 3761.7$\pm$14.6 & 330.6$\pm$5.0 & - & - & 2,0\
` 23204252+0813014` & ` NGC7626 ` & 061842 & 55484.263 & 190 & 2.0 & 3380.4$\pm$13.7 & 283.1$\pm$6.2 & 0.58$\pm$0.08 & - & 7,0\
` 23204252+0813014` & ` NGC7626 ` & 061843 & 55484.277 & 190 & 2.0 & 3375.6$\pm$12.8 & 275.2$\pm$4.8 & 0.63$\pm$0.08 & - & 8,0\
` 23220658+4050435` & ` NGC7640 ` & 261478 & 56219.062 & 142 & 1.0 & 347.3$\pm$20.7 & 41.3$\pm$39.8 & -0.46$\pm$0.08 & 0.01$\pm$0.29 & 11,4\
` 23252175+2829425` & ` UGC12591 ` & 060741 & 55445.179 & 103 & 2.0 & 6810.8$\pm$14.1 & 306.0$\pm$6.8 & 0.35$\pm$0.03 & 0.54$\pm$0.12 & 37,4\
` 23254867+2701478` & ` NGC7660 ` & 151639 & 55737.382 & 45 & 2.0 & 5637.5$\pm$13.3 & 263.8$\pm$7.2 & -0.48$\pm$0.37 & - & 2,1\
` 23255415+4232111` & ` NGC7662 ` & 161412 & 55894.196 & 210 & 1.0& - & - & - & - & -\
` 23271932+1228025` & ` NGC7671 ` & 141197 & 55565.057 & 315 & 2.0 & 3790.3$\pm$14.3 & 269.1$\pm$5.7 & 0.41$\pm$0.08 & - & 10,1\
` 23283508+3224565` & ` NGC7680 ` & 061892 & 55485.083 & 98 & 2.0 & 5021.6$\pm$14.5 & 264.0$\pm$6.9 & - & - & 1,0\
` 23322441+1550520` & ` NGC7691 ` & 161583 & 55910.118 & 335 & 1.0 & 3970.7$\pm$15.6 & 28.9$\pm$28.7 & -0.34$\pm$0.06 & 0.25$\pm$0.38 & 20,3\
` 23334928+3003372` & ` UGC12667 ` & 161377 & 55893.190 & 255 & 1.0 & 3728.0$\pm$14.5 & 49.2$\pm$25.7 & -0.47$\pm$0.01 & -0.54$\pm$0.08 & 86,7\
` 23382938+2701526` & ` NGC7720 ` & 060774 & 55446.182 & 200 & 2.0 & 8873.5$\pm$15.7 & 352.1$\pm$9.2 & 0.62$\pm$0.06 & 0.79$\pm$0.26 & 19,2\
` 23382938+2701526` & ` NGC7720 ` & 060775 & 55446.197 & 200 & 2.0 & 8877.5$\pm$14.3 & 343.2$\pm$7.7 & 0.57$\pm$0.05 & 0.44$\pm$0.17 & 24,4\
` 23382938+2701526` & ` NGC7720 ` & 151256 & 55723.431 & 60 & 2.0 & 8854.4$\pm$14.3 & 302.8$\pm$13.2 & -0.72$\pm$0.82 & - & 2,0\
` 23382938+2701526` & ` UGC12716 ` & 062171 & 55496.279 & 254 & 2.0 & 8879.9$\pm$15.7 & 337.9$\pm$7.9 & 0.63$\pm$0.04 & 0.64$\pm$0.17 & 23,3\
` 23400080+2708014` & ` NGC7728 ` & 062172 & 55496.294 & 255 & 2.0 & 9235.0$\pm$16.0 & 323.8$\pm$10.2 & 0.36$\pm$0.09 & - & 11,0\
` 23435437+2604320` & ` NGC7741 ` & 253443 & 56133.320 & 105 & 1.0 & 732.8$\pm$16.6 & 52.1$\pm$28.8 & -0.55$\pm$0.01 & 0.08$\pm$0.04 & 68,25\
` 23435437+2604320` & ` NGC7741 ` & 261364 & 56215.093 & 105 & 1.0 & 728.1$\pm$22.0 & 52.5$\pm$35.2 & -0.54$\pm$0.01 & 0.21$\pm$0.06 & 51,15\
` 23442113+0956025` & ` NGC7743 ` & 261517 & 56220.101 & 95 & 1.0 & 1612.9$\pm$12.6 & 94.7$\pm$6.9 & 0.29$\pm$0.01 & 0.95$\pm$0.05 & 73,6\
` 23481133-0225574` & ` PGC196688 ` & 161348 & 55892.145 & 205 & 2.0 & 6644.9$\pm$12.8 & 191.9$\pm$8.1 & - & - & 1,0\
` 23491399+1805394` & ` PGC072514 ` & 153606 & 55825.369 & 240 & 2.0 & 24649.1$\pm$12.3 & 298.1$\pm$11.6 & 0.83$\pm$0.42 & - & 1,0\
` 23505859+2708507` & ` NGC7768 ` & 151295 & 55725.446 & 70 & 2.0 & 8007.0$\pm$14.9 & 267.1$\pm$7.7 & 0.15$\pm$0.24 & - & 3,1\
` 23512488+2006425` & ` NGC7771 ` & 140238 & 55537.167 & 255 & 2.0 & 4366.7$\pm$15.1 & 150.0$\pm$16.4 & -0.37$\pm$0.00 & -0.52$\pm$0.03 & 141,10\
` 23512674+2035105` & ` MRK0331 ` & 261480 & 56219.097 & 150 & 1.0 & 5312.3$\pm$12.1 & 124.7$\pm$11.9 & -0.25$\pm$0.00 & -0.35$\pm$0.02 & 276,11\
` 23520987+3116356` & ` NGC7773 ` & 160766 & 55866.273 & 230 & 1.0 & 8323.7$\pm$11.5 & 118.4$\pm$7.9 & 0.26$\pm$0.00 & 1.08$\pm$0.00 & 87,13\
` 23551903+0554571` & ` NGC7785 ` & 141011 & 55558.085 & 140 & 2.0 & 3811.9$\pm$14.1 & 247.8$\pm$7.4 & 0.24$\pm$0.12 & - & 7,0\

[^1]: An alternative to this dynamical definition is to use photometry. By deprojecting the photometry, the total amount of enclosed stellar mass as function of distance from the black hole can be estimated. The light can be converted into mass with a mass-to-light ratio (from either dynamics or a stellar population analysis), and the mass can then be compared to the mass of a putative black hole. However, the photometry needs to have sufficient spatial resolution to resolve the region of interest. Typical ground-based imaging is not good enough for this, and thus, for this survey, we adopt the the dynamical  estimator.

[^2]: We gratefully acknowledge the use of the IDL astrolib [@1993ASPC...52..246L] and MPFit [@2009ASPC..411..251M]

[^3]: The LRS calibration program does provide flux and radial velocities standards stars on a regular cadence.

[^4]: Note that method for measuring $\sigma_e$ varies; the measurement requires integral field observations to get the 2D luminosity weighted dispersion and that is not always available. Also the definition of half-light radius varies; e.g. some authors only use the bulge $R_e$.

[^5]: Bulge fractions are not known for the 2MASS and HETMGS galaxies, and thus we will only consider total luminosity here. Nonetheless, the  has been shown to be a good proxy for black hole mass by [@2014ApJ...780...70L]