Pwede mo ba akong tulungan dito? need ko kasi gumawa ng part ko sa position paper which is "Assertion 1" ako yung akiro, if gagawin mo yung part ko mag based ka sa example na nasa ibaba. 👇 (please do it on English) don't forget too. 3-4 sentences lang.



Ito yung Example 👇

Addressing the Controversy Surrounding Mandatory Vaccination Policies

Introduction

The issue of mandatory vaccination policies has ignited considerable debate in recent times. While some argue for the necessity of such measures to protect public health, others express concerns about individual rights and autonomy. This position paper aims to explore both sides of the argument, acknowledging the counter-argument while asserting the importance of mandatory vaccination for the greater good.

Body

The Counter Argument

One of the primary arguments against mandatory vaccination is rooted in the belief that it infringes upon personal freedom and individual autonomy. Critics argue that individuals should have the right to make choices about their own bodies and medical interventions without interference from the government.

Refuting of the Counter Argument:

While individual freedoms are crucial, they are not absolute. Societal well-being often necessitates limitations on individual liberties to prevent harm to others. Public health crises, such as contagious diseases, warrant collective action to protect vulnerable populations.

Giving Evidences for the Counter Argument:

Opponents of mandatory vaccination often cite instances where adverse reactions or complications have occurred, emphasizing the need for an individualized approach to medical decisions. They argue that forcing vaccination may lead to unintended consequences and erode trust in the healthcare system.

The Argument:

Assertion of Claim No. 1 (with position and supporting points):

Mandatory vaccination is essential to achieve herd immunity, protecting vulnerable populations unable to receive vaccines due to medical reasons. By increasing overall immunization rates, the spread of preventable diseases can be significantly reduced, ultimately saving lives.

Assertion of Claim No. 2 (with position and supporting points):

Public health measures, including mandatory vaccinations, have a proven track record in controlling and eradicating infectious diseases. Historical successes, such as the eradication of smallpox, underscore the effectiveness of collective vaccination efforts in safeguarding communities.

Assertion of Claim No. 3 (with position and supporting points):

Individual rights must be weighed against the responsibility to protect public health. The greater good often requires individuals to make sacrifices for the well-being of society as a whole, and mandatory vaccination serves as a reasonable and necessary measure in this context.

Conclusion

Restating of Argument:

In conclusion, while acknowledging concerns about individual autonomy, the imperative to safeguard public health through mandatory vaccination cannot be overstated. Striking a balance between individual freedoms and collective responsibility is paramount.

Providing Plan of Action:

Moving forward, it is crucial to engage in open and informed discussions about vaccination policies, addressing concerns and disseminating accurate information. Policymakers should prioritize public education, fostering understanding and acceptance of the importance of vaccination in preserving the health of communities.

Ito yung Example ☝️



Ito naman sabi ng leader namin 👇

Leader: Start na talaga tayo sa paggawa ng position paper (ito yung mga naka assign sa inyo):

Topic: Restrictions on Social Media for Children

Introduction (skye kristen yasmin eunice lao de castro)
	
Body

The Counter Argument (jesse)

Refuting of the Counter Argument: (gab)

Giving Evidences for the Counter Argument: (nero)

The Argument:
Assertion of Claim No. 1  (with position and supporting points): (akiro)

Assertion of Claim No. 2 (with position and supporting points): (migs)

We support for restricting children’s access to social media due to its negative effects on mental health.Studies show correelation beetween excessive social media use and increased rates of anxiety, depression and low self-esteem among children.limiting their exposure can 
                       
Assertion of Claim No. 3 (with position and supporting points): (bj)

Conclusion
Restating of Argument: (rap)

Providing Plan of Action:(austin powers)

Ito naman sabi ng leader namin ☝️



Ito yung topic namin 👇

Topic: Restricting children on social media 

Ito yung topic namin ☝️



Guide 👇

In an academic and professional setting, the learners are given the opportunity to put into writing their opinions regarding the issue that is termed as position paper.
A position paper is an essay that expounds a standpoint of an author or specified entity about an issue.
The main objective of a position paper is to persuade the readers with opinions which are valid and defensible.
Note that position papers are demanding assignments that require you to take a stand on an issue or idea presented in a text. Although your opinion is important and forms the basis for your argument, it should not dominate the assignment.
Position papers rely on critical evaluation that goes beyond a mere surface reading or a passionate personal reaction. Remember, if there is no other side to your argument then you do not have one.
It should NOT be done as a research paper or a collection and arrangement of diverse sources. Instead, your paper should exhibit an intensive analysis of a philosophical thesis, and your criticism of the thesis and your supporting arguments.

"Principles in Writing a Position Paper"

1. Think in debate mode.
You have to choose a side and argue in favor of your point of view. A position paper should not restate the obvious facts about the text or topic; a strong position paper shows the author's ability to pick a side or take a stand.

Whether you choose to write about a theme throughout a particular work, a specific scene that captures the essence of an entire text, or one side of an issue, remember to write definitively about your position.

Which argument is effective?

Ineffective

"Legislators continue to debate the extent to which government should be involved in the lives of individual citizens."

Effective

"A responsible government must respect the rights of individuals and agree not to interfere with citizens' abilities to make sensible decisions for themselves."

The second point can easily be debated while the first states a well-known fact that is not open to individual interpretation.

2. Consider the opposing side.

What would somebody say to challenge your stance? You must consider the other viewpoint and dismantle it in your paper, using enough details to show that you understand both sides. Also, keep in mind that name calling has no place in position papers.

What can you say about the argument?

"People who think otherwise are idiots and therefore their opinions don't count. Such personal attacks can backfire and make you appear to have no valid reasons for holding different views."

"People who think otherwise are idiots and therefore their opinions don't count."

Such personal attacks can backfire and make you appear to have no valid reasons for holding different views. Remember, name calling has no place in position papers.

3. Include evidence.

Although you are expressing your personal opinion, it must be upheld by references to specific details- supporting facts, arguments, quotations- in order to have any validity.

You must be able to prove that your position is valid based on a thorough knowledge of the topic, text, or argument. Outside research may be required; look for other sources based on opinion as well as 
sources providing factual background information.

4. Use the active voice of the verbs, and observe proper word choice.

Avoid using the passive voice and words such as "maybe, perhaps, possibly, etc." that weaken your argument. Phrases like "in my opinion" are also needless and sound apologetic instead of certain; if you're writing the paper, it is obviously your informed opinion.

Which argument is effective?

Ineffective

"It is possible that people support the idea of abortion because women should have the right to decide what to do with their bodies."

Effective

"By threatening to pass anti abortion laws, the government violates an essential right for all mankind: the right choose." to

Word choice can really make or break your argument.

Characteristics of a Good Position Paper

1. Written in author's own words

2. Has a clear purpose

3. Well-organized

4. Coherent and Cohesive

5. Clear

6. Complete

7. Substantively correct

8. Mechanically correct

9. Creative

1. Written in author's own words

This is probably the most basic requirement. Plagiarism is intentionally or unintentionally representing someone else's ideas as one's own, and should be avoided at all costs. You may appeal to the ideas of others if you acknowledge doing so and cite these sources appropriately.

2. Has a clear purpose

Your readers should always have a clear understanding of what you are going to do in your paper. It is helpful to think about position papers as attempts to answer specific questions, and to think of papers as falling to four general kinds, according to the types of questions they attempt to address.

Identify if your position paper falls under one of the following purposes of writing:

• Expository writing

• Comparative writing

• Evaluative writing

• Constructive writing

3. Well-organized

Your paper as a whole, and each part of your paper, should work to fulfill the purpose of the paper (that is to say, it should help you to answer the question that your paper poses). It should take up each task in the order of most helpful to meeting that objective and it should finish one thing before starting another.

4. Coherent and Cohesive

To ensure the coherence of ideas, do not include irrelevant or inessential material, unrelated to the attainment of the paper's purpose. If you are not going to discuss an argument, for example, do not spend time setting it out.

For cohesion, ensure that your paper flows nicely from one point to the next. Use transitional/cohesive devices and organizational patterns.

5. Complete

Make sure that you include enough material to attain your paper's purpose. Flesh out all ideas and arguments in sufficient detail and ensure that you adequately defend claims that need defending.

Use specific examples to elucidate and support general claims. Respond to anticipated objections to your position or argument, even if your response is simply the acknowledgment of an objection and a recognition of the fact that the objection will need to be addressed at some future time.

6. Clear

Make sure that you really understand what you are saying and that an average member of your audience could be expected to understand it, too. When in doubt about your audience, the positions and arguments should be stated in such a way that they would be understood by a reasonably intelligent reader who is unfamiliar with the material.

7. Substantively Correct

The facts and information included in your position paper should be real, legitimate, or factual. These should be taken from credible sources.

8. Mechanically Correct

Adhere to the rules of grammar, academic writing style,. word choice, and language.

9. Creative

Ideally, the paper should be creative, asking new questions, answering old questions in new ways, seeing new things, seeing old things in new ways, or making an original point.

Parts of a Position Paper

1. Introduction

II. Body

A. The Counter Argument Argument

1. Supporting Information for the Counter Argument

2. Refuting of the Counter Argument

3. Giving Evidences for the Counter Argument

B. The Argument

1. Assertion of Claim No. 1 (with position and supporting points)

2. Assertion of Claim No. 2 (with position and supporting points) 3. Assertion of Claim No. 3 (with position and supporting points)

III. Conclusion

A. Restating of Argument

B. Providing Plan of Action

Introduction

1. Provide a background or context of the issue.

2. State the purpose of the paper and what you intend to show.

3. Write your thesis statement.

Body

1. In the Counter Argument section, resent objections

to the thesis and give your supporting reasons for

those objections.

2. In the Argument section, either support the original view by overcoming the counter arguments or reject the original view by showing the objections constitute unanswerable difficulties.

If you cannot take either of the two positions, then explain carefully why the problem cannot be solved in its present form. In such a case, try to suggest what further work needs to be done.

Conclusion

1. Restate the purpose of the paper

2. Summarize the significant main parts.

3. Restate your position.

4. State possible course of actions that may be done by the audience in relation to the issue.

Guide ☝️

For more information ito sabi ng leader namin sakin. 👇

Assertion is just like an argument na pinapatunayan yung stand mo do'n sa topic. For example, yung topic natin is about the restrictions of social media for children and we chose to side with  it kasi there's a lot of threats in the internet that may affect the children's well-being and health. Pero siyempre 'wag puro gan'to ang gawin maghanap pa ng ibang rason kung bakit tayo umaagree na i-restrict ang mga bata sa paggamit ng socmed.

Leader: Guys, Hindi naman talaga kailangang mag-citation, kaya lang natin gagawin 'yon kasi kailangan pa rin natin ng evidence para masuportahan yung position natin doon sa topic. For example, doon sa sample paper ni ma'am, nag-side sila na necessary ang mandatory vaccination so ang mga nilagay nila sa assertions nila ay yung evidence na may nagagawa ang mga vaccines para magkaroon ng herd immunity proving na vaccines should be mandatory.

Leader: Kayo ko lang naman pinapalagay citations niyo ay para ma-check ko siya

Ito naman sabi sakin ng kaklase ko

@Akiro mag focus kanaman sa iba wag sa health

For more information ito sabi ng leader namin sakin. ☝️