As an editor. Correct for spelling mistakes, punctuation, and grammar. Use plain British English. Use the most appropriate words so the message is clear, relatable and engaging. Do not change the meaning or intent of the message. Thank you for doing this.
Hi Louis,
I trust you had a wonderful week. You have probably wondered what happened to me given you didn’t receive any email until now. Well, I have now built this new reputation, or shall I say habit to be rushing at the end of the day to the point I can’t barely write a quick email. However, I do make a note of my highlights or plans so I can then update you as I am doing right now. Maybe you could suggest how to better manage my time, so I continue with the frequency of writing you daily. Let see how next week goes, shall we? Other than that, I think my week was decent. Let’s go right into it. I’ll summarise day by day as I have done in the past two weeks.
Monday
Because of the upcoming team meeting on Wednesday, I planned to work out an outline for the bit size on Aiden. I also planned to investigate the data representativeness that was done previously and see if there was any additional test or anything helpful that we would need. This task was assigned during the Monday’s stand up. I unfortunately realised the deadline for Lynne and Andy cards were far gone. Next time, I shouldn’t wait long especially because I always carried my card with me so I could easily have committed a few minutes to write a short message and contribute. Though nobody would say a thing, it’s a common courtesy to do that especially because I have benefitted from it in the past. I thought it would be good idea to book the MOT for the car for Friday which I eventually did on Thursday. DS confirmed that he would review the list of variables I proposed for the MDS, and we would discussed than on Wednesday as part of our 1-2-1 meeting. DS wondered why the choice of the current field to identify zero ead given there was another field (air ead) that seemed more relevant. None of had an answer but we agreed it would be good to check with the LC project. RL shared the location of the LC code on representativeness, and I spent most of Monday looking in the incumbent model document. I noticed there were 5 separate areas to cover as part of the DQ on representativeness. I also made some attempt at defining prompts that could be used to elicit some help from the AI although I didn’t end up pursuing any further. 
Tuesday
I continued looking into the data representativeness documentation and thought about what else we might consider enhancing what was already done. One question I came up with was whether an additional segmentation would be more suitable. I found out I could no longer access Aiden so was concerned I wouldn’t be able to do the live demo as planned. Thankfully, after asking around it turned out I was using an old link to the app. Nevertheless, I had already asked XW if she was willing to help on live demo should that not have been resolved which she gladly agreed. I also used a publicly available version to help draft an outline of what I might share. I have a copy in my email which I could always build from. 

Wednesday
In the team meeting RZ highlighted the need for everyone for everyone with outstanding annual leaves to book them immediately. If more than 2 weeks would be required on a long stretch it would be important to speak to the manager to ensure suitable replacement or cover is in place. Unfortunately, there was no time allotted to present Aiden but this should give me more time to prepare so that it’s even more better whenever than happens. I should probably confirm ahead of time if there’s time for it because it could have been forgotten by RZ. AB said she might reach out for some support with coding, although in the end she didn’t as she managed to resolve it. XW asked that I shared my planned leave with her in case there is a clash and what she submitted is only tentative. 

Thursday
I had a phone call from AN and unfortunately the application from MC was not successful. I should focus on understanding the data inside and out. Ultimate objective is to wear the CTO hat, so I need back to read more about emerging technologies. I needed to check the DET log and ensure I responded to any queries that needed my attention, at least the one I could. I continued looking at the data representativeness if I could trace the code and outputs from the incumbent model. I found the code and the outputs for the scope of application for the rest I didn’t. I did raise the question with team members, but I closed for the day, no one had yet responded. DS shared the APM on the team channel and this should be used to compare the results and what we get from the data representativeness. During our 1-2-1, DS suggested I book my AL, send an invite to the team. I need to update my goals as agreed and set up a call for Monday to discuss how we would update the MIRS especially regarding the variables we would need in the second RDS.

Friday
I asked the same questions about the representativeness. XW shared a link to a file I had seen the day before but didn’t feel it was correct. Given time is passing, I am assuming it’s the one until I find something else. I went through the document line by line to identify what I would need from which I raised some questions for myself to answer. I also looked at the LC’s code and made note of the functions I would need. I had planned to look at the  DQ log but never got to it. I still haven’t written the Aiden strategy but please remind me to get it done by COB on Monday. 

I have exhausted whatever energy I had left for the day. This is the end for now, but I’ll be coming back next week with some update.
Until then, remain sober!
Thanks
Henry