Rewrite the entire text below, make it sound more coherent and better. Mention everything in great detail, including Hadithes and Quran Verses. Be very sceptical of the author Mohammad Hijab and also add some additional good arguments:

''According to modern and classical Arabic dictionaries and lexicons, such as Lisan al-Arab and Al-Mujam Al-Waseet, "kul" means "all" or "all things". And early Islamic scholars such as Al-Tabari, Al-Qurtubi, and Al-Razi all interpreted chapter 51, verse 49 in the same way. Even modern Islamic scholars such as Sayyid Qutb and Fazlur Rahman agree with that. Thus, Mohammad's claim that kul has a different meaning here is not supported by any evidence, but is just another modern reinterpretation by Muslim apologists.

The reference to Quran 76:2, where ''everything'' isn't meaning literal everything does not refute the Problems of 51:49, as the context is completely different. Kul is a commonly used word in the Quran to emphasize the universality of a statement or command. For example, in the phrase "kul-u khayr," the word "kul" conveys the meaning of "everything that is good."

Therefore, the Quran does claim all creatures were created in pairs. That is disputed by the existence of several biological examples. Asexual reproduction is common in many living organisms, including plants, protists, and invertebrates, and some organisms can regenerate. Some creatures, including plants, are hermaphrodites, while others change their sex during their life cycle. Parthenogenesis is a form of reproduction in which the ovum develops into a new individual without fertilization, and has been observed in many lower animals, including insects. And let's not forget about Schizophyllum commune, a fungus with over 28,000 distinct sexes.

And even if we wwould assume the Word kul does not mean every single thing, IT still DOES UNDERMINE THE CLAIMS OF WISE AND MIRACULOUS NATURE OF THE QURAN.

What's so miraculous or wise about asserting that "some things are in pairs". like of course some are. Any 7th century would have known this. night/day, light/dark, male/female etc. 

But there is nothing miraculous or wise about asserting that "some things are in pairs".

So, to sum it up, Mohammed Hijab's claim that the word "kul" in Chapter 51, Verse 49 of the Quran doesn't necessarily mean "everything" or "all things" with no exceptions is not supported by the linguistic and exegetical evidence. And, the Quranic claim of all creatures being created in pairs is disputed by various biological examples such as asexual organisms, hermaphrodites, parthenogenetic organisms, and Schizophyllum commune, among others. The existence of these examples challenges the Quranic claim that everything was created in pairs.

Some also claim the mere existence of antimatter complements to matter, without regard to their relative abundance (matter dominates in our universe after the first second post the Big Bang) proves the validity of the ‘creation in pairs’ Qur'anic verses, particularly 43:12, 51:49, and especially 36:36 (as in “pairs of things unknown to them”). The ‘things unknown to them’ part supposedly refers to our modern understanding of particle physics.

The British physicist Paul Dirac, who discovered that matter was created in pairs, won the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1933. This finding, known as "parity," revealed the duality known as matter and antimatter. Antimatter bears the opposite characteristics to matter. For instance, contrary to matter, antimatter electrons are positive and protons negative.

Relevant Qur'anic Ayahs
And He it is Who spread out the earth and placed therein firm hills and flowing streams, and of all fruits He placed therein two spouses (male and female). He covereth the night with the day. Lo! herein verily are portents for people who take thought.
Qur'an 13:3
Glory be to Him Who created all the sexual pairs, of that which the earth groweth, and of themselves, and of that which they know not!
Qur'an 36:36
He Who created all the pairs, and appointed for you ships and cattle whereupon ye ride.
Qur'an 43:12
And all things We have created by pairs, that haply ye may reflect.
Qur'an 51:49
Some may try to argue that not all of these verses convey the message that ‘all creatures’ are created in pairs, taking the literal or metaphorical sense whichever and whenever suits them best.

For example, they may claim that verse 13:3 refers only to fruits, or that verse 36:36 refers only to things grown from the Earth (i.e. plants). However verses 43:12 and 51:49 make it absolutely clear that Allah created all creatures in pairs. There is no ambiguity.

Recognizing the possibility of relevance solely to humans, the following verses will be ignored. Further, their inclusion would not detract from the analysis:

That He did create in pairs,- male and female,
Qur'an 53:45
And of him He made two sexes, male and female.
Qur'an 75:39
By (the mystery of) the creation of male and female;
Qur'an 92:3

Prophet Muhammad did not have access to a microscope or a Level 1 biology textbook. Therefore, he could not have known about asexual organisms, parthenogenetic organisms, hermaphrodites, or Schizophyllum commune.

It was easy for him to observe male and female humans, camels, and dogs. But as he had no idea about micro-organisms and herpetology he was unaware that he was mistaken in his belief that all creatures came in males and females.

Based on the existence of the schizophyllum commune, and asexual, hermaphroditic and parthenogenetic organisms, the Qur'anic verses about Allah creating all creatures in pairs (male and female) are shown to be in error.

The ancient Chinese Yin-Yang duality principle proves that the spurious claim of ‘creation in pairs’ to mean matter-antimatter complements to be unremarkable. Besides, some Hindus make similar claims about the Rig-Veda as the Muslims make about the Qur'an and scriptural allusions to matter and antimatter.

In reality, such claims of scientific foreknowledge can be made for any ancient text, for example the Georgica.''