System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Using the provided topic as a starting point, brainstorm ideas for videos that can be made about it on YouTube.
Input: In spite of the fact that procrastination feels bad to you, why do you do it?

[Ground truth Answer]
+ The reason why you procrastinate
+ A documentary about procrastination
+ How to quit procrastination
+ Recording people talking about their procrastination habits
+ Interview people while they are procrastinating
+ People who have failed to accomplish their New Year's resolutions explain why

[Assistant's Response]
¡Claro! Aquí tienes algunas ideas para videos sobre el tema de la procrastinación y por qué la gente tiende a hacerlo, a pesar de que no se siente bien:

1. **"La Ciencia de la Procrastinación"**: Un video que explique los estudios psicológicos detrás de la procrastinación, incluyendo factores como la ansiedad, el miedo al fracaso y la falta de motivación.

2. **"Procrastinación vs. Productividad: ¿Cuál es tu estilo?"**: Un video interactivo donde los espectadores puedan identificar su estilo de procrastinación y recibir consejos personalizados para mejorar su productividad.

3. **"Desmitificando la Procrastinación: Mitos y Realidades"**: Un video que aborde los mitos comunes sobre la procrastinación y ofrezca una perspectiva más realista sobre por qué todos procrastinamos a veces.

4. **"5 Estrategias para Combatir la Procrastinación"**: Un tutorial práctico que presente técnicas efectivas para superar la procrastinación, como la técnica Pomodoro, la regla de los dos minutos, o la creación de listas de tareas.

5. **"Historias de Procrastinadores: ¿Por qué lo hacemos?"**: Un video en formato de entrevistas donde diferentes personas compartan sus experiencias con la procrastinación y lo que han aprendido de ellas.

6. **"Procrastinación Creativa: ¿Es realmente tan mala?"**: Un análisis sobre cómo algunas personas utilizan la procrastinación como una forma de creatividad y cómo puede ser beneficiosa en ciertos contextos.

7. **"Un Día en la Vida de un Procrastinador"**: Un vlog que muestre un día típico de alguien que procrastina, con un enfoque humorístico y reflexiones sobre cómo se siente al final del día.

8. **"Mindfulness y Procrastinación: Cómo la Atención Plena Puede Ayudarte"**: Un video que explore cómo la práctica de mindfulness puede ayudar a reducir la procrastinación y mejorar la concentración.

9. **"Procrastinación en la Era Digital: Redes Sociales y Distracciones"**: Un análisis de cómo las redes sociales y la tecnología contribuyen a la procrastinación y consejos para manejar estas distracciones.

10. **"Retos de 30 Días para Vencer la Procrastinación"**: Un video que invite a los espectadores a

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: