System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
What were the main causes of World War I and how did it start? Discuss the key events that led to the war and how it impacted the world.

[Ground truth Answer]
World War I, also known as the Great War, began on July 28, 1914, and lasted until November 11, 1918. The war was primarily fought between two large alliances: the Triple Entente, comprising of France, Russia, and the United Kingdom, and the Central Powers, consisting of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and the Ottoman Empire. The main causes of World War I were a complex mix of factors, including militarism, alliances, imperialism, and nationalism. 

1. Militarism: The nations of Europe had been increasing their military power over time, adopting the idea that a strong military was essential for national security and prestige. This arms race created an atmosphere of constant suspicion, tension, and preparedness for war.

2. Alliances: In order to strengthen their security, nations formed alliances promising mutual protection in case of an attack. The formation of these alliances divided Europe into two opposing groups of countries, making conflict among any one pair of nations likely to involve the entire continent.

3. Imperialism: European powers were competing for colonies and territories in Africa, Asia, and the Americas. This competition for resources and prestige often led to conflicts and heightened tensions among these powers.

4. Nationalism: Ethnic groups in Europe aspired to have their own independent nations or expand their territories, leading to competition and tension among different countries in the region.

The event that triggered the start of World War I was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria by a Serbian nationalist named Gavrilo Princip on June 28, 1914. Austria-Hungary accused Serbia of supporting the assassination plot and presented a harsh ultimatum. When Serbia failed to comply with all the demands, Austria-Hungary declared war on Serbia on July 28, 1914. As a result of the interlocking alliances, the conflict quickly escalated, with Russia, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom, among others, entering the war. 

Key events leading to the start of World War I include:

1. The formation of the Triple Entente and the Triple Alliance: Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy formed the Triple Alliance in 1882. In response, France, Russia, and the United Kingdom formed the Triple Entente in 1907.

2. The Bosnian Crisis (1908-1909): Austria-Hungary's annexation of Bosnia angered Serbia and Russia, increasing tensions in the Balkan region.

3. The First and Second Balkan Wars (1912-1913): A series of conflicts in the Balkans increased instability in the region and contributed to the hostilities leading up to World War I.

4. The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand: The assassination, as mentioned earlier, directly triggered the events leading to World War I.

World War I had a profound impact on the world, causing significant political, social, and economic changes:

1. Over 16 million people, including civilians, died as a direct result of World War I, with countless others suffering from physical and psychological injuries.

2. The Treaty of Versailles, which ended the war, imposed severe financial reparations and territorial losses on Germany and Austria. These punitive measures contributed to economic hardships and social unrest, eventually paving the way for World War II.

3. The war led to the downfall of four major empires: the German, Austro-Hungarian, Russian, and Ottoman Empires. Several new nations emerged in their wake, as international boundaries were redrawn.

4. The war contributed to the rise of the United States and Japan as global powers. The former became a major player in world affairs due to its economic and military strength, while the latter saw rapid industrialization and expansionist policies in Asia.

5. World War I also marked the beginning of a broader cultural shift away from the idea of war as an honorable and glorious undertaking. The brutality and devastation of the war led many to question the previously held notions of patriotism and honor in warfare.

[Assistant's Response]
World War I, also known as the Great War, was a complex conflict with multiple causes and significant global repercussions. Here’s a breakdown of the main causes, key events leading to the war, and its impact on the world.

### Main Causes of World War I

1. **Militarism**: In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, European powers engaged in an arms race, significantly increasing their military capabilities and fostering a culture that glorified military strength and preparedness.

2. **Alliances**: Europe was divided into two major alliance systems. The **Triple Alliance** included Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy, while the **Triple Entente** comprised France, Russia, and the United Kingdom. These alliances were intended for mutual defense but also meant that a conflict involving one nation could quickly escalate to involve others.

3. **Imperialism**: The competition for colonies and global dominance among European powers created tensions, particularly in Africa and Asia. The decline of the Ottoman Empire also led to instability in the Balkans, further heightening conflicts.

4. **Nationalism**: Nationalist sentiments were strong across Europe, with various ethnic groups seeking independence or asserting dominance. This was especially volatile in the Balkans, where Slavic nationalism posed a direct threat to the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

5. **Assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand**: The immediate trigger for the war was the assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary and his wife Sophie on June 28, 1914, by Gavrilo Princip, a Bosnian Serb nationalist. This event set off a series of diplomatic crises.

### Key Events Leading to the War

1. **July Crisis**: Following the assassination, Austria-Hungary, with Germany's backing, issued an ultimatum to Serbia. Serbia's response was deemed insufficient, leading Austria-Hungary to declare war on Serbia on July 28, 1914.

2. **Mobilization and Declarations of War**: Russia, an ally of Serbia, began mobilizing its forces. Germany declared war on Russia on August 1, 1914, and on France on August 3. Germany's invasion of Belgium on August 4 prompted the United Kingdom to declare war on Germany.

3. **Expansion of the Conflict**: The war quickly spread beyond Europe, involving colonies and non-European powers. The Ottoman Empire joined the Central Powers,

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: