You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to data storage systems, and more particularly to network file servers.
2. Background Art
Mainframe data processing, and more recently distributed computing, have required increasingly large amounts of data storage. This data storage is most economically provided by an array of low-cost disk drives integrated with a large semiconductor cache memory. Such cached disk arrays were originally introduced for use with IBM host computers. A channel director in the cached disk array executed channel commands received over a channel from the host computer.
More recently, the cached disk array has been interfaced to a data network via at least one data mover computer. The data mover computer receives data access commands from clients in the data network in accordance with a network file access protocol such as the Network File System (NFS). (NFS is described, for example, in RFC 1094, Sun Microsystems, Inc., xe2x80x9cNFS: Network File Systems Protocol Specification,xe2x80x9d Mar. 1, 1989.) The data mover computer performs file locking management and mapping of the network files to logical block addresses of storage in the cached disk storage subsystem, and moves data between the client and the storage in the cached disk storage subsystem.
In relatively large networks, it is desirable to have multiple data mover computers that access one or more cached disk storage subsystems. Each data mover computer provides at least one network port for servicing client requests. Each data mover computer is relatively inexpensive compared to a cached disk storage subsystem. Therefore, multiple data movers can be added easily until the cached disk storage subsystem becomes a bottleneck to data access. If additional storage capacity or performance is needed, an additional cached disk storage subsystem can be added. Such a storage system is described in Vishlitzky et al. U.S. Pat. No. 5,737,747 issued Apr. 7, 1998, entitled xe2x80x9cPrefetching to Service Multiple Video Streams from an Integrated Cached Disk Array,xe2x80x9d incorporated herein by reference.
Unfortunately, data consistency problems may arise if concurrent client access to a read/write file is permitted through more than one data mover. These data consistency problems can be solved in a number of ways. For example, as described in Vahalia et al., U.S. Pat. No. 5,893,140 issued Apr. 6, 1999, entitled xe2x80x9cFile Server Having a File System Cache and Protocol for Truly Safe Asynchronous Writes,xe2x80x9d incorporated herein by reference, locking information can be stored in the cached disk array, or cached in the data mover computers if a cache coherency scheme is used to maintain consistent locking data in the caches of the data mover computers. However, as shown in FIG. 1, labeled xe2x80x9cPrior Art,xe2x80x9d a more elegant solution to the data consistency problem has been implemented at EMC Corporation in a network file server system having multiple stream server computers and one or more cached disk arrays.
FIG. 1 shows a network file server system having at least two data mover computers 21 and 22. The first data mover 21 has exclusive access to read/write files in a first file system 23, and the second data mover 22 has exclusive access to read/write files in a second file system 24. As shown, the file systems 23, 24 are respective volumes of data contained in the same cached disk array 25, although alternatively each file system 23, 24 could be contained in a respective one of two separate cached disk arrays. For example, each of the data mover computers 21, 22 has a respective high-speed data link to a respective port of the cached disk array 25. The cached disk array 25 is configured so that the file system 23 is accessible only through the data port connected to the first data mover 21 and so that the file system 24 is accessible only through the data port connected to second data mover 22. Each of the data movers 21, 22 maintains a directory of the data mover ownership of all of the files in the first and second file systems 23, 24. In other words, each of the data movers maintains a copy of the file system configuration information in order to recognize which data mover in the system has exclusive access to a specified read/write file.
Each of the data movers 21, 22 may receive file access requests from at least one network client. For example, the first data mover 21 has a network port 28 for receiving file access requests from a first client 26, and the second data mover 22 has a network port 29 for receiving file access requests from a second client 27. The clients 26, 27 communicate with the data movers using the connection-oriented NFS protocol. Whenever the data mover 21 receives a file access request from the client 26, it checks the configuration directory to determine whether or not the file specified by the request is in a file system owned by the data mover 21. If so, then the data mover 21 places a lock on the specified file, accesses the file in the file system 23, and streams any read/write data between the client 26 and the file system 23. If the file specified by the request is not a file system owned by the data mover 21, then the data mover 21 forwards the request to the data mover that owns the file system to be accessed. For example, if the client 26 requests access to a file in the file system 24, then the first data mover 21 forwards the file access request to the second data mover 22. The second data mover 22 places a lock on the file to be accessed, the second data mover accesses the file, and the second data mover streams any read/write data between the first data mover 21 and the file in the file system 24. The first data mover then streams the read/write data between the second data mover 22 and the client 26. The second data mover 22 responds to file access requests from its client 27 in a similar fashion, by directly servicing file access request to files in the file system 24 that it owns, or forwarding to other data movers the requests for access to the files in file systems that it does not own.
The solution as shown in FIG. 1 is rather efficient because the data movers 21, 22 can be linked by a dedicated high-speed data link for the exchange of read/write data between them. Therefore, there is no additional loading of the data network between the data movers and the clients and no additional loading of the data links between the cached disk array 25 and the data movers 21, 22. The data movers can cache the file access information (e.g., file locks) and file data and attributes for the files that they own, so that the loading on the data links between the cached disk array and the data movers 21, 22 can be somewhat reduced. In the network file system implemented at EMC Corporation, when a data mover did not own the file system to be accessed, the data mover forwarded to or exchanged NFS data packets with the data mover that owned the file system to be accessed. Such a system was relatively easy to implement, since it involved creating a proxy router routine that would recognize whether or not a NFS data packet from a client was for access to a file system owned by another data mover, and if so, routing the data packet to the data mover that owned the file system. The data mover owning the file system could treat the forwarded data packet in a fashion similar to a data packet received directly from a client.
Although the system of FIG. 1 is satisfactory for handling NFS file access requests, it has a number of limitations that will become increasingly significant. The current trend is toward higher-speed network links and interconnection technology, such as technology for the Fibre-Channel standards being developed by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI). In a network employing high-speed links and interconnection technology, the delays inherent in a connectionless communications protocol such as NFS become more pronounced.
The Internet uses a connection-oriented protocol known as the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP/IP). In order to provide read/write file sharing over the Internet, the Internet Network Working Group has drafted a specification for a Common Internet File System (CIFS) Protocol. The CIFS protocol is described, for example, in Paul L. Leach and Dilip C. Naik, xe2x80x9cA Common Internet File System,xe2x80x9d Microsoft Corporation, Dec. 19, 1997, incorporated herein by reference. The status of development of CIFS is posted on the Internet at http://www.microsoft.com/workshop/networking/cifs/default.asp. CIFS is touted as incorporating the same high-performance, multi-user read and write operations, locking, and file-sharing semantics that are the backbone of today""s sophisticated enterprise computer networks.
According to the CIFS protocol specification of Leach and Naik, p. 14-15, protocol dialects of NT LM 0.12 and later support distributed file system operations. The distributed file system is said to give a way for this protocol to use a single consistent file naming scheme which may span a collection of different servers and shares. The distributed file system model employed is a referral-based model. This protocol specifies the manner in which clients receive referrals. The client can set a flag in the request server message block (SMB) header indicating that the client wants the server to resolve this SMB""s paths within the distributed file system known to the server. The server attempts to resolve the requested name to a file contained within the local directory tree indicated by the tree identifier (TID) of the request and proceeds normally. If the request pathname resolves to a file on a different system, the server returns the following error: xe2x80x9cSTATUS_DFS_PATH_NOT_COVEREDxe2x80x94the server does not support the part of the DFS namespace needed to resolved the pathname in the request.xe2x80x9d The client should request a referral from this server for further information. A client asks for a referral with the TRANS2_DFS_GET_REFERRAL request containing the DFS pathname of interest. The response from the server indicates how the client should proceed. The method by which the topological knowledge of the DFS is stored and maintained by the servers is not specified by this protocol.
In accordance with one aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of operating a data mover computer using a connection-oriented protocol for permitting a client to access a file system. A network file server system has at least a first data mover computer coupled to a data network for servicing data access requests from at least one network client, and at least a second data mover computer coupled to the first data mover computer for servicing data access requests from the first data mover computer. At least one file system in data storage is accessible to the second data mover computer. The first data mover computer uses the connection-oriented protocol to obtain client context information and to respond to a session setup request from the client by authenticating the client. Then the first data mover computer responds to a file system connection request from the client by forwarding the client context information and the file system connection request to the second data mover computer. Then the first data mover computer maintains a connection between the first data mover computer and the second data mover computer when the client accesses the file system and the first data mover computer passes file access requests from the client to the second data mover computer and returns responses to the file access requests from the second data mover computer to the client.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of operating a data mover computer to use the Common Internet File System (CIFS) Protocol for maintaining a connection with a client for permitting the client to access a file system. A network file server system has at least a first data mover computer coupled to a data network for servicing data access requests from at least one network client, and at least a second data mover computer coupled to the first data mover computer for servicing data access requests from the first data mover computer. At least one file system in data storage is accessible to the second data mover computer. The first data mover computer uses the Common Internet File System (CIFS) Protocol to respond to a negotiate request from the client and to respond to a session setup request from the client to authenticate the client and assign a user identification for a client session. Then the first data mover computer responds to a file system connection request from the client by assigning a tree identifier and forwarding the user identification for the client session and the tree identifier and the file system connection request to the second data mover computer. Then the first data mover computer maintains a connection between the first data mover computer and the second data mover computer when the client accesses the file system and the first data mover computer passes file access requests from the client to the second data mover computer and returns responses to the file access requests from the second data mover computer to the client.
In accordance with still another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method of operating a data mover computer to use the Common Internet File System (CIFS) Protocol for maintaining a connection with a client for permitting the client to access a file system. A network file server system has at least a first data mover computer coupled to a data network for servicing data access requests from at least one network client, and at least a second data mover computer coupled to the first data mover computer for servicing data access requests from the first data mover computer. At least one file system in data storage is accessible to the second data mover computer. The first data mover computer uses the Common Internet File System (CIFS) Protocol to respond to a negotiate request from the client and to respond to a session setup request from the client to authenticate the client and assign a user identification for a client session. Then the first data mover computer responds to a file system connection request from the client by assigning a tree identifier and forwarding the user identification for the client session and the tree identifier and the file system connection request to the second data mover computer. Then the first data mover computer maintains a connection between the first data mover computer and the second data mover computer when the client accesses the file system and the first data mover computer passes file access requests from the client to the second data mover computer and returns responses to the file access requests from the second data mover computer to the client. The first data mover computer forwards the user identification for the client session and the tree identifier and the file system connection request to the second data mover computer by appending stream context information to the file system connection request and forwarding the file system connection request including the appended stream context information to the second data mover computer. The stream context information includes the user identification for the client session, the tree identifier, a server message block (SMB) protocol dialect, a maximum SMB message packet size, and access credentials associated with the user identification. Multiple clients of the first data mover computer request access to file systems accessed through the second data mover computer and the multiple clients share at least one Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) connection between the first data mover computer and the second data mover computer by allocation of virtual channels within the shared TCP connection. Data packets of more than one of the virtual channels are multiplexed over the shared TCP connection.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, there is provided a network file server. The network file server includes a first data mover computer having a port for coupling to a data network for servicing data access requests from at least one network client, and at least a second data mover computer coupled to the first data mover computer for servicing data access requests from the first data mover computer. At least one file system in data storage is accessible to the second data mover computer. The first data mover computer is programmed to use a connection-oriented protocol for maintaining a connection with the client for permitting the client to access the file system. The first data mover computer is programmed for using the connection-oriented protocol to obtain client context information and to respond to a session setup request from the client by authenticating the client, and then responding to a file system connection request from the client by forwarding the client context information and the file system connection request to the second data mover computer, and then maintaining a connection between the first data mover computer and the second data mover computer when the client accesses the file system and the first data mover computer passes file access requests from the client to the second data mover computer and returns responses to the file access requests from the second data mover computer to the client.
In accordance with still another aspect of the invention, there is provided a program storage device containing a program for at least a first data mover computer in a network file server. The first data mover computer has a port for coupling to a data network for servicing data access requests from at least one network client. The first data mover computer is coupled to at least a second data mover computer for servicing data access requests from the first data mover computer. At least one file system in data storage is accessible to the second data mover computer. The program is executable by the first data mover computer for using a connection-oriented protocol for maintaining a connection with the client for permitting the client to access the file system. The program is executable by the first data mover computer for using the connection-oriented protocol to obtain client context information and to respond to a session setup request from the client by authenticating the client, and then responding to a file system connection request from the client by forwarding the client context information and the file system connection request to the second data mover computer, and then maintaining a connection between the first data mover computer and the second data mover computer when the client accesses the file system and the first data mover computer passes file access requests from the client to the second data mover computer and returns responses to the file access requests from the second data mover computer to the client.