You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Ancestry.com ( 2009 ) 1870 United States Federal Census (database online). Ancestry.com Operations, search.ancestry.com/search/db.aspx?dbid=7163.

Anderson , Margo J. ( 1988 ) The American Census: A Social History . New Haven, CT : Yale University Press .

Attanasio , Orazio , and Hoynes , Hillary Williamson ( 2000 ) “ Differential mortality and wealth accumulation .” Journal of Human Resources 35 (1) : 1 – 29 .

Bohannon , John ( 2015 ) “ Reproducibility: Many psychology papers fail replication test .” Science 349 (6251) : 910 –11.

Bricker , Jesse , Bucks , Brian K. , Kennickell , Arthur , Mach , Traci L. , and Moore , Kevin ( 2015 ) “ Drowning or weathering the storm? Changes in family finances from 2007 to 2009 ,” in Hulten , Charles R. and Reinsdorf , Marshall B. (eds.) Measuring Wealth and Financial Intermediation and Their Links to the Real Economy . Chicago : University of Chicago Press : 323 –48. Also available as National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper, number 16985, April 2011.

Buck , Stuart ( 2015 ) “ Solving reproducibility [editorial] ,” Science 348 (6242) : 1403 .

Butterfield , Herbert ( 1931 ) The Whig Interpretation of History. New York: W.W. Norton.

Carter , Susan B. , Gartner , Scott Sigmund , Haines , Michael R. , Olmstead , Alan L. , Sutch , Richard , and Wright , Gavin , eds. ( 2006 ) Historical Statistics of the United States: Earliest Time to the Present, Millennial Edition. 5 vols. New York: Cambridge University Press.

DeLong , J. Bradford ( 2003 ) “ A history of bequests in the United States ,” in Munnell , Alicia H. and Sundén , Annika (eds.) Death and Dollars: The Role of Gifts and Bequests in America . Washington, DC : Brookings Institution Press : 33 – 53 .

Eichengreen , Barry ( 1984 ) “ Mortgage interest rates in the populist era .” American Economic Review 74 (5) : 995 – 1015 .

Fatout , Paul ( 1976 ) Mark Twain Speaking, 1st ed. Iowa University Press. Reissued 2006.

Field , Alexander ( 2014 ) “ Capital in the twenty-first century: A review essay .” Journal of Economic History 74 (3) : 916 –20.

Fisher , Irving ( 1919 ) “ Economists in public service: Annual address of the president .” American Economic Review 9 (1, Suppl.) : 5 – 21 .

Galbraith , John Kenneth ( 1954 ) The Great Crash, 1929 . Boston : Houghton Mifflin .

Giles , Chris ( 2014 ) “Data problems with Capital in the 21st Century.” Blog posted by the Financial Times, May 23.

Hacker , J. David ( 2011 ) “ A census-based count of the Civil War dead .” Civil War History 57 (4) : 307 –48.

Hacker , J. David ( 2013 ) “ New estimates of census coverage in the United States, 1850–1930 .” Social Science History 37 (1) : 71 – 101 .

Haig , Robert Murray ( 1919 ) “ The Revenue Act of 1918 .” Political Science Quarterly 34 (3) : 369 –91.

Holmes , George K. ( 1893 ) “ The concentration of wealth .” Political Science Quarterly 8 (4) : 589 – 600 .

Jones , Alice Hansen ( 1980 ) Wealth of a Nation to Be: The American Colonies on the Eve of the Revolution . New York : Columbia University Press .

Kennickell , Arthur B. ( 2001 ) “Modeling wealth with multiple observations of income: Redesign of the sample for the 2001 Survey of Consumer Finances.” Federal Reserve Board working paper, revised October 2001.

Kennickell , Arthur B. ( 2009 ) “Ponds and streams: Wealth and income in the U.S., 1989 to 2007.” Federal Reserve Board Staff working papers: Finance and Economics Discussion Series, number 2009–13, January 7.

Kennickell , Arthur B. ( 2012 ) “Tossed and turned: Wealth dynamics of U.S. households, 2007–2009.” Federal Reserve Board Staff working papers, Finance and Economics Discussion Series, number 2011–51, May 29.

King , Willford Isbell ( 1915 ) The Wealth and Income of the People of the United States. New York: Macmillan.

Kopczuk , Wojciech ( 2015 ) “ What do we know about the evolution of top wealth shares in the United States? ” Journal of Economic Perspectives 29 (1) : 47 – 66 . Also available as National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, number 20734, December 2014.

Kopczuk , Wojciech , and Saez , Emmanuel ( 2004 ) “ Top wealth shares in the United States, 1916–2000: Evidence from estate tax returns .” National Tax Journal 57 (2, Pt. 2) : 445 –88.

Krugman , Paul ( 2014 a) “ Wealth over work (op-ed) .” New York Times , March 24, A21.

Krugman , Paul ( 2014 b) “ The Piketty panic (op-ed) .” New York Times , April 25, A25.

Krugman , Paul ( 2014 c) “ Why we're in a New Gilded Age: [review essay of Thomas Piketty, Capital in the Twenty-First Century] .” New York Review of Books , May 8.

Lampman , Robert J. ( 1962 ) The Share of Top Wealth-Holders in National Wealth , 1922 –56. Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press .

Lindert , Peter H. ( 2000 ) “ Three centuries of inequality in Britain and America ,” in Atkinson , Anthony B. and Bourguignon , François (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution . Vol. 1. Amsterdam : Elsevier : 167 – 216 .

Lindert , Peter H. ( 2006 ) “ The distribution of income and wealth ,” in Lindert , Peter H. , Barrington , Linda , and Fisher , Gordon M. (eds.) “Economic inequality and poverty,” in Susan Carter , B. et al. (eds.) Historical Statistics of the United States : Earliest Time to the Present, Millennial Edition. 5 vols. New York : Cambridge University Press , Vol. 2 , 621 – 625 , 652 – 662 .

Lindert , Peter H. ( 2015 ) “ Faire fructifier Le capital au XXIe siècle ” [“ Making the most of Capital in the Twenty-First Century ”], Annales. Histoire, Sciences Sociales 70 (1) : 21 – 34 . (Abstracts in French and English online at ) “” [“”],. (Abstracts in French and English online at https://muse.jhu.edu/article/601271 .)

Lindert , Peter H. , and Williamson , Jeffrey G. ( 2013 ) “ American incomes before and after the Revolution .” Journal of Economic History 73 (3) : 725 –65.

Luckey , John R. ( 2011 ) “A history of federal estate, gift, and generation-skipping taxes,” Congressional Research Service, CRS Report for Congress 95–444, updated January 24, 2011.

Magness , Phillip W. , and Murphy , Robert P. ( 2017 ) “ Challenging the empirical contribution of Thomas Piketty 's Capital in the Twenty-First Century ,” in Delsol , Jean-Phillippe , Lecaussin , Nicolas , and Martin , Emmanuel (eds.), Anti-Piketty: Capital for the 21st Century, Washington DC : Cato Institute , 2017 : 101 – 140 .

Maine, Bureau of Industrial and Labor Statistics ( 1891 ) Fifth Annual Report of the Bureau of Industrial and Labor Statistics for the State of Maine, 1891. Burleigh and Flynt, published 1892.

Mears , Ellen R. , Richards , Seth , and Cutler , David M. ( 2008 ) “ The gap gets bigger: Changes in mortality and life expectancy, by education, 1981–2000 .” Health Affairs 27 (2) : 350 –60.

Mendershausen , Horst ( 1956 ) “ The patterns of estate tax wealth ,” Pt. 3 in Goldsmith , Raymond W. (ed.) A Study of Saving in the United States . Vol. 3, “Special studies.” Princeton, NJ : Princeton University Press : 275 – 381 .

Milanovic , Branko ( 2014 ) “ The return of ‘patrimonial capitalism’: Review of Thomas Piketty's Capital in the Twenty-First Century .” Journal of Economic Literature 52 (2) : 519 –34.

Newcombe , Caroline B. ( 2011 ) “The origin and civil law foundation of the community property system: Why California adopted it and why community property principles benefit women.” University of Maryland Journal of Race, Religion, Gender, and Class 11 (1): 1–38.

New York Times ( 1870 ) “ Curiosities of the census: The experience of an enumerator ” [editorial], New York Times , July 24.

Nosek , Brian A. , Alter , George , Banks , G. C. , Borsboom , D. , Bowman , S. D. , Breckler , S. J. , Buck , S. , Chambers , C. D. , Chin , G. , Christensen , G. , Contestabile , M. , Dafoe , A. , Eich , E. , Freese , J. , Glennerster , R. , Goroff , D. , Green , D. P. , Hesse , B. , Humphreys , M. , Ishiyama , J. , Karlan , D. , Kraut , A. , Lupia , A. , Mabry , P. , Madon , T. , Malhotra , N. , Mayo-Wilson , E. , McNutt , M. , Miguel , E. , Paluck , E. Levy , Simonsohn , U. , Soderberg , C. , Spellman , B. A. , Turitto , J. , VandenBos , G. , Vazire , S. , Wagenmakers , E. J. , Wilson , R. , and Yarkoni , T. ( 2015 ) “ Policy forum: Promoting an open research culture ,” Science 348 (6242) : 422 – 1425 .

Piketty , Thomas ( 2014 a) Capital in the Twenty-First Century, translated by Arthur Goldhammer . Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press .

Piketty , Thomas ( 2014 b) “ Technical appendix of the book Capital in the Twenty-First Century ” (online document). Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press : 1 – 97 , b) “” (online document). http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/capital21c (accessed May 1, 2014).

Piketty , Thomas ( 2014 c) “Appendix to chapter 10. Addendum: Response to FT,” May 28, c) “Appendix to chapter 10. Addendum: Response to FT,” May 28, http://piketty.pse.ens.fr/files/capital21c/en/Piketty2014TechnicalAppendixResponsetoFT.pdf (accessed May 30, 2014).

Piketty , Thomas , and Saez , Emmanuel ( 2014 ) “ Inequality in the long run .” Science 344 (6186) : 838 –43. Online supplementary material at doi: 10.1126/science.1251936 .

Ransom , Roger L. , and Sutch , Richard ( 1975 ) “ The impact of the Civil War and of emancipation on southern agriculture .” Explorations in Economic History 12 (1) : 1 – 28 .

Ransom , Roger L. , and Sutch , Richard ( 1988 ) “ Capitalists without capital: The burden of slavery and the impact of emancipation .” Agricultural History 62 (3) : 133 –60.

Ransom , Roger L. , and Sutch , Richard ( 2001 ) One Kind of Freedom: The Economic Consequences of Emancipation, 2nd ed . New York : Cambridge University Press .

Rosenbloom , Joshua L. , and Stutes , Gregory W. ( 2008 ) “ Reexamining the distribution of wealth in 1870 ,” in Rosenbloom , Joshua L. (ed.) Quantitative Economic History: The Good of Counting . New York : Routledge : 146 –169.

Ruggles , Steven , Alexander , J. Trent , Genadek , Katie , Goeken , Ronald , Schroeder , Matthew B. , and Sobek , Matthew ( 2010 a) Integrated Public Use Microdata Series: USA, Version 5.0 (Machine-readable database), University of Minnesota .

Ruggles , Steven , Alexander , J. Trent , Genadek , Katie , Goeken , Ronald , Schroeder , Matthew B. , and Sobek , Matthew ( 2010 b) “ IPUMS design: Introductory essays on using the IPUMS ,” Chapter 5: “ Family interrelationships ” (Machine-readable file), University of Minnesota .

Saez , Emmanuel , and Zucman , Gabriel ( 2016 ) “ Wealth inequality in the United States since 1913: Evidence from capitalized income tax data .” Quarterly Journal of Economics 131 (2) : 519 –78.

Shammas , Carole ( 1993 ) “ A new look at long-term trends in wealth inequality in the United States .” American Historical Review 98 (2) : 412 –32.

Smith , Harriet Elinor , ed. ( 2010 ) Autobiography of Mark Twain, Vol. 1. Berkeley : University of California Press .

Snowden , Kenneth A. ( 1987 ) “ Mortgage rates and American capital development in the late nineteenth century .” Journal of Economic History 47 (3) : 671 –92.

Snowden , Kenneth A. ( 1995 ) “ The evolution of interregional mortgage lending, 1870–1940: The life insurance-mortgage company connection ,” in Lamoreaux , Naomi and Raff , Daniel (eds.) Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise . Chicago : University of Chicago Press : 209 –47.

Snowden , Kenneth A. ( 2006 ) “ Construction, housing, and mortgages ,” in Carter , Susan B et al. (eds.) Historical Statistics of the United States: Earliest Time to the Present , Millennial Edition, 5 vols. New York : Cambridge University Press : vol. 4 , pp. 395 –572.

Solow , Robert M. ( 2014 ) “Thomas Piketty is right: Everything you need to know about ‘Capital in the Twenty-First Century,’” The New Republic, April 22.

Soltow , Lee ( 1975 ) Men and Wealth in the United States , 1850 – 1870 . New Haven, CT : Yale University Press .

Steckel , Richard H. ( 1994 ) “ Census manuscript schedules matched with property tax lists: A source of information on long-term trends in wealth inequality .” Historical Methods 27 (2) : 71 – 85 .

Steckel , Richard H. , and Moehling , Carolyn M. ( 2001 ) “ Rising inequality: Trends in the distribution of wealth in industrializing New England .” Journal of Economic History 61 (1) : 160 –83.

Stiglitz , Joseph E. ( 2011 ) “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%,” Vanity Fair, May, ) “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%,” Vanity Fair, May, http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/ top-one percent-201105 (accessed 23 May, 2014).

Stiglitz , Joseph E. ( 2012 ) The price of inequality: How today's divided society endangers our future. New York: W.W. Norton (paperback edition, 2013).

Summers , Lawrence H. ( 2014 ) “The inequality puzzle: Thomas Piketty's tour de force analysis doesn't get everything right, but it's certainly gotten us pondering the right questions,” Democracy 33, ) “The inequality puzzle: Thomas Piketty's tour de force analysis doesn't get everything right, but it's certainly gotten us pondering the right questions,” Democracy 33, http://www.democracyjournal.org/32/the-inequality-puzzle.php?page=all (accessed May 23, 2014).

Sutch , Richard ( 2010 ) A survey of 1,084 workers in Maine, 1890; Reported in the Fifth Annual Report of the Maine Bureau of Industrial and Labor Statistics: Codebook and user's manual, Historical Labor Statistics Project , University of California .

Twain , Mark ( 1876 ) The Adventures of Tom Sawyer . Hartford : American Publishing Company .

Twain , Mark ( 1885 ) The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. New York: Charles L. Webster and Co.

Twain , Mark ( 1897–1906 ) Autobiography . See Smith , Harriet Elinor , (ed.) ( 2010 ) University of California Press .

Twain , Mark ( 1907 ) “ Chapters from my Autobiography—IX ,” North American Review 184 (606) : 1 – 14 .

Twain , Mark , and Warner , Charles Dudley ( 1873 ) The Gilded Age: A Tale of Today . Hartford : American Publishing Company .

US Bureau of the Census ( 1978 ) Twenty Censuses: Population and Housing Questions , 1790 – 1980 . Washington, DC : Government Printing Office .

US Census Office, Ninth Census ( 1870 ) Statistics of Wealth and Industry of the United States . Washington, DC : Government Printing Office .

US National Archives and Records Administration (n.d.) “1870 U.S. Census, Population Schedules,” NARA Microfilm Publication M593, 1,761 rolls, National Archives and Records Administration.

Waldron , Hilary ( 2007 ) “Trends in mortality differentials and life expectancy for male Social Security–covered workers, by average relative earnings,” ORES working paper, number 108, Social Security Administration, Office of Research, Evaluation, and Statistics, October.

Williamson , Jeffrey G. , and Lindert , Peter H. ( 1980 ) American Inequality: A Macroeconomic History . New York : Academic Press .

Williamson , Samuel H. ( 2017 ) “Seven Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount, 1774 to Present,” measuringworth.com [calculator online], ) “Seven Ways to Compute the Relative Value of a U.S. Dollar Amount, 1774 to Present,” measuringworth.com [calculator online], www.measuringworth.com/uscompare/ (accessed January 4, 2017).

Wolff , Edward N. ( 2011 ) “Recent trends in household wealth in the U.S.: Rising debt and the middle class squeeze,” in Gonzalez , Jason M. (ed.) Economics of Wealth in the 21st Century. Annandale-on-Hudson, NY: Nova Science Publishers: 1–41. Also available as “Recent trends in household wealth in the United States: Rising debt and the middle-class squeeze—an update to 2007,” Levy Economics Institute of Bard College working paper, number 589, March 2010.

Wolff , Edward N. ( 2013 ) “ The asset price meltdown, rising leverage, and the wealth of the middle class .” Journal of Economic Issues 47 (2) : 333 –42. Also available as National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, number 18559, November 2012.

Wolff , Edward N. ( 2014 ) “Household wealth trends in the United States, 1962–2013: What happened over the Great Recession?” National Bureau of Economic Research working paper, number 20733, December 2014.