System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
We've already decided on the title and topic for our blog post. I would appreciate it if you wrote an introduction paragraph to attract the readers' attention.
Input: Blog title: Healthy Apple Muffins
Blog Topic: recipe and tips for cooking a good apple muffin

[Ground truth Answer]
Let me tell you this, apple muffins are extremely easy to make, and they are totally worth the effort. If you've never been much of a cook or baker before, I can promise you that making these will change your mind. And if they don't get the job done, at least they'll taste good!

[Assistant's Response]
Certainly! Here’s a compelling introduction for your blog post on Healthy Apple Muffins:

---

Welcome to the wonderful world of healthy baking! Today, we're excited to share a delightful recipe for Healthy Apple Muffins that are not only delicious but also packed with nutritious ingredients. Imagine biting into a warm muffin, bursting with the sweetness of fresh apples and the comforting aroma of cinnamon. These muffins are perfect for breakfast on-the-go, a satisfying snack, or a guilt-free dessert to share with loved ones. Join us as we uncover the secrets to creating moist, flavorful apple muffins, along with expert tips to ensure your baking experience is both enjoyable and successful. Let’s embark on this tasty adventure together!

--- 

This introduction aims to captivate your readers while highlighting the key aspects of the recipe and the overall experience of baking.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: