I'm creating the presentation for a system demo of a given feature. here is the report of changes and a presentation suggestion based on them. tell me if i'm missing any key points for the current status of my presentation:

<my_presentation>
i have progressed with the ppt and i'm trying to summarize the key changes made to the codebase in separate slides. am i missing another key point?

1. key changes to sc_rte_all (all of those new artifacts which fixed the gen_data_platform issue)
2. conditional logic (adding conditions to the artifact output declarations inside genie.xml to avoid the workflow expecting certain artifacts that won't be created becase of build caps=
3. unidifed ASR/POSIX artifacts into _common ones (removed redundancy, improve maintainability)
4. improved naming
</my_presentation>

<presentation_suggestion>
# System Demo Presentation: [COM-RTE] Genie Wishes Checker Completion

**Duration:** 15 Minutes  
**Audience:** Management Team  
**Presenter:** [Your Name]

---

## Slide 1: Title Slide

**Completion Report: [COM-RTE] Genie Wishes Checker**

- **Presenter:** [Your Name]
- **Date:** [Presentation Date]
- **Project:** COMTrain - FORGE 2.0 Enablement

*Speaker Notes:*  
Welcome everyone. Today, I will be presenting the completion report for the [COM-RTE] Genie Wishes Checker, a critical component in our journey towards FORGE 2.0.

---

## Slide 2: Introduction &amp; Motivation

**Why Genie Wishes Checker?**

- **Current Environment:**  
  - AUTOSAR-based with Jinja-based code generators.
  - Generators utilize Jinja templates, AUTOSAR object models, and SWC specifications (ARXML) to produce C source code.

- **Technical Challenges Identified:**  
  1. **Inappropriate Artifact Definitions:**  
     - `gen_data_platform` utilized artifacts that pointed to entire directories instead of individual files.
     - Example: Artifact pointed to a directory, and output file paths were manually appended, violating best practices for wish and artifact granularity.
     
  2. **Overlapping Artifact Paths:**  
     - Single artifacts targeting broad directories led to overlapping output file paths.
     - Resulted in duplicated generation steps and potential conflicts in code outputs.
     
  3. **Manual Route Appending:**  
     - Workflow steps manually appended routes of output files based on directory artifacts.
     - This approach circumvented the automated handling intended by the Genie Wishes framework, increasing maintenance overhead.
     
  4. **Lack of Clear Input-Output Mapping:**  
     - Dependencies between wishes were implicitly defined through directory-level artifacts.
     - Made it difficult to trace and manage dependencies, hindering parallel execution and scalability.

- **Goal:**  
  - Refactor artifact definitions to adhere to best practices of individual input/output files per wish.
  - Eliminate overlapping paths and automate dependency mapping.
  - Enhance workflow efficiency and support the transition to FORGE 2.0.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Our existing system employed broad artifact definitions that compromised the precision and scalability of our code generation workflows. Specifically, using directory-level artifacts led to overlapping output paths and manual interventions that were both error-prone and inefficient. The Genie Wishes Checker was developed to address these technical deficiencies and streamline our operations towards FORGE 2.0.

---

## Slide 3: Challenges Faced

**Key Technical Challenges**

1. **Inappropriate Artifact Definitions:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - `gen_data_platform` artifacts pointed to entire directories rather than individual output files.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Forced manual appending of output file routes within generator scripts.
     - Violated the principle that each wish should have precise input and output files, leading to increased risk of errors and maintenance complexity.

2. **Overlapping Artifact Paths:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Single artifacts targeting broad directory paths resulted in overlapping and redundant output file definitions.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Generated duplicate or conflicting C source files.
     - Complicated the build process and increased the likelihood of runtime errors.

3. **Manual Route Appending:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Generators had to manually construct output file paths by appending routes to directory artifacts.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Introduced inconsistencies and potential path resolution issues.
     - Increased the maintenance burden as any directory structure changes required updates across multiple generator scripts.

4. **Lack of Clear Input-Output Mapping:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Dependencies between wishes were implicitly defined through directory-level artifacts.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Hindrance to automated dependency resolution.
     - Prevented parallel execution of independent workflow steps, leading to longer build times.

5. **Violation of Best Practices for Wishes and Artifacts:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Best practices dictate that wishes and artifacts should target individual files to maintain clarity and automation.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Broad artifact definitions undermined the Genie Wishes framework's ability to automate and optimize workflows effectively.

*Speaker Notes:*  
These technical challenges not only hampered our current operations but also posed significant risks to our scalability and efficiency as we advance towards FORGE 2.0. Addressing them was imperative to ensure a robust and maintainable code generation process.

---

## Slide 4: Solution Overview

**Comprehensive Refactoring Strategy**

1. **Granular Artifact Definitions:**  
   - **Action:**  
     - Transitioned from directory-level artifacts to individual file-level artifacts.
   - **Example:**  
     ```cue
     &quot;rte_const_c_common&quot;: {
         uri: &quot;mcl:rte_const_c_common&quot;
         visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
         locations: [
             { path: &quot;.../Rte_TTTech&quot;, pattern: &quot;Rte_[cp_swc].c&quot; }
         ]
     }
     ```
   - **Benefit:**  
     - Ensures each artifact precisely targets its respective output file, adhering to best practices.

2. **Elimination of Overlapping Paths:**  
   - **Action:**  
     - Redefined artifacts to prevent any overlapping or conflicting paths.
   - **Implementation:**  
     - Centralized and reusable artifact definitions across all genies.
   - **Benefit:**  
     - Prevents duplicate code generation and streamlines the build process.

3. **Automated Dependency Mapping:**  
   - **Action:**  
     - Leveraged individual artifact definitions to automate workflow dependencies.
   - **Implementation:**  
     - Configured genie wishes to explicitly define input and output files, enabling the workflow engine to identify and execute independent steps in parallel.
   - **Benefit:**  
     - Enhances build efficiency and reduces integration times by enabling parallel executions.

4. **Refactored Genie Configurations (`genie.xml`):**  
   - **Action:**  
     - Updated `genie.xml` to reference the new granular artifacts.
     - Implemented conditional logic to include artifacts based on build capabilities and host attributes.
   - **Example:**
     ```xml
     <tool engine=&quot;python&quot; environment=&quot;3&quot;>
         <arg>.../sc_rte_all.py</arg>
         <arg>--ecu_name {PARAM:ECU_name}</arg>
         <arg>--cmatrix {INPUT:mxml:1700_-_Core_-_com_matrix#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
         <arg>--rte_const_c {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_const_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
         <!-- Conditional arguments -->
     </tool>
     ```
   - **Benefit:**  
     - Ensures genie wishes operate with precise artifact references, enhancing automation and reducing manual interventions.

5. **Cross-Repository Adaptations:**  
   - **Action:**  
     - Updated related repositories to align with the new artifact definitions.
     - Modified generator scripts to utilize precise artifact paths.
   - **Implementation:**  
     - Example change in the Inter-Host COM repository:
       ```diff
       - with open(SHM_SIZE_PP_PATH(cmd.gen_data_platform), 'r') as input_file:
       + with open(shm_size_pp_path, 'r') as input_file:
       ```
   - **Benefit:**  
     - Maintains consistency across the ecosystem, enabling seamless integrations and standardized processes.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Our solution involved a meticulous refactoring of artifact definitions and genie configurations to address the technical challenges head-on. This strategy not only aligns with best practices but also lays a solid foundation for efficient and scalable workflows essential for FORGE 2.0.

---

## Slide 5: Detailed Artifact Refactoring

**From Broad to Granular Artifact Definitions**

- **Old Artifact Example:**
  ```cue
  &quot;1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte_ASR&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mxml:1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte_ASR&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          { path: &quot;.../Rte_TTTech&quot;, pattern: &quot;Rte_[cp_swc]/*.c&quot; },
          { path: &quot;.../Rte_TTTech&quot;, pattern: &quot;Rte_[cp_swc]/*.h&quot; },
          // Additional patterns...
      ]
  }
  ```
  
  *Issues:*
  - Ambiguous targeting of multiple files via directory patterns.
  - Manual appending of output paths in generator scripts.
  - Increased risk of overlapping artifacts and duplicate file generation.

- **New Granular Artifacts:**
  ```cue
  &quot;rte_const_c_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:rte_const_c_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          { path: &quot;.../Rte_TTTech&quot;, pattern: &quot;Rte_[cp_swc].c&quot; }
      ]
  }

  &quot;rte_xcp_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:rte_xcp_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          { path: &quot;.../Rte_XCP&quot; }
      ]
  }

  &quot;ra_client_header_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:ra_client_header_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          { path: &quot;.../SWU_RA&quot;, pattern: &quot;Ra_Swu_Client_*.h&quot; }
      ]
  }
  
  // Additional granular artifacts...
  ```
  
  *Benefits:*
  - **Precision:**  
    - Each artifact targets specific output files, eliminating ambiguity.
  
  - **Automation:**  
    - Genie wishes can now automatically handle dependencies without manual path manipulations.
  
  - **Maintainability:**  
    - Simplifies updates and reduces the risk of errors in generator scripts.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Transitioning to granular artifact definitions was pivotal in resolving ambiguity and enhancing automation. By targeting individual files, we ensured that each genie wish operates with utmost precision, thereby reducing maintenance overhead and mitigating the risk of errors.

---

## Slide 6: Genie Configuration Improvements

**Refactoring `genie.xml` for Enhanced Precision**

- **Original Configuration:**
  ```xml
  <tool engine=&quot;python&quot; environment=&quot;3&quot;>
      <arg>.../sc_rte_all.py</arg>
      <arg>--ecu_name {PARAM:ECU_name}</arg>
      <arg>--cmatrix {INPUT:mxml:1700_-_Core_-_com_matrix#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
      <!-- Additional arguments... -->
  </tool>
  ```

- **Updated Configuration with Granular Artifacts:**
  ```xml
  <tool engine=&quot;python&quot; environment=&quot;3&quot;>
      <arg>.../sc_rte_all.py</arg>
      <arg>--ecu_name {PARAM:ECU_name}</arg>
      <arg>--cmatrix {INPUT:mxml:1700_-_Core_-_com_matrix#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
      
      <!-- rtec generator -->
      <arg>--rte_const_c {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_const_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
      <arg>--rte_const_h {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_const_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
      <arg>--rte_xcp {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_xcp#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
      
      <!-- Conditional arguments -->
      <conditional_args>
          <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
          <arg>--mw_shmsvc_cfg {OUTPUT:mxml:mw_shmsvc_cfg#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
      </conditional_args>
  </tool>
  ```

- **Implemented Conditional Logic:**
  ```xml
  <conditional_args>
      <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
      <arg>--mw_shmsvc_cfg {OUTPUT:mxml:mw_shmsvc_cfg#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
  </conditional_args>
  ```
  
  *Explanation:*
  - **Condition:**  
    - Checks if the build capacity does not contain an SOA host, ensuring that certain artifacts are only included when relevant.
  
  - **Conditional Argument:**  
    - Includes the `mw_shmsvc_cfg` output artifact only when the condition is met, avoiding unnecessary artifact processing.

- **Benefit:**
  - **Automated Dependency Handling:**  
    - Clearly defines which artifacts are required for each build scenario, enabling the workflow engine to optimize execution paths.
  
  - **Error Reduction:**  
    - Minimizes manual interventions, reducing the likelihood of human errors in artifact management.

*Speaker Notes:*  
By updating the `genie.xml` configurations to reference granular artifacts and implementing conditional logic, we achieved a more automated and error-resistant workflow. This ensures that each genie wish is executed with the precise artifacts it requires, enhancing overall build efficiency.

---

## Slide 7: Cross-Repository Adaptations

**Ensuring Consistency Across the Ecosystem**

- **Inter-Host COM Repository:**
  - **Updated Generators:**
    - Modified `Generators/ihc/sc_shmsvc_yaml.py` and `Generators/ihc/sc_icomdbg.py` to utilize new file-level artifacts.
    - **Example Change:**
      ```diff
      - with open(SHM_SIZE_PP_PATH(cmd.gen_data_platform), 'r') as input_file:
      + with open(shm_size_pp_path, 'r') as input_file:
      ```
  - **Impact:**
    - Removed dependency on broad directory artifacts.
    - Enhanced precise artifact referencing within generator scripts.

- **Com-Buffer Repository:**
  - **Updated Generators:**
    - Similar modifications to align with granular artifact definitions.
  - **Impact:**
    - Ensured all generator scripts target specific files, maintaining consistency.

- **Remote Access Repository:**
  - **Refactored Genie Wishes:**
    - Updated `genie.xml` to reference new artifacts with conditional arguments based on host architecture.
    - **Example Change:**
      ```xml
      <conditional_args>
          <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>BC_RTE_CS</condition>
          <arg>{INPUT:mcl:ra_client_header#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
          <arg>{INPUT:mcl:ra_source#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
          <!-- Additional conditional inputs... -->
      </conditional_args>
      ```
  - **Impact:**
    - Adapted artifact references to support both Classic and SOA architectures efficiently.

- **ADAS Sysdef Repository:**
  - **Minor Syntax Adjustments:**
    - Modified artifact referencing syntax to accommodate group-level artifact paths.
    - **Example Change:**
      ```diff
      - ECU0.artifacts.&quot;1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte&quot;,
      + system.ecus[ECU0_name].artifacts.&quot;1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte&quot;,
      ```
  - **Impact:**
    - Ensured artifact definitions are scalable and easily referenceable across different system definitions.

- **Sysdef-RDB2-CP-A Repository:**
  - **Simplified Artifact Naming:**
    - Renamed artifacts for clarity and consistency.
    - **Example Change:**
      ```diff
      - &quot;1700_-_Rte_-_Rte_ExtProfileID&quot;
      + &quot;rte_extprofileid&quot;
      ```
  - **Impact:**
    - Streamlined artifact names facilitate easier maintenance and understanding.

**Benefits:**

- **Unified Workflow Framework:**  
  - Consistent artifact usage across all repositories ensures seamless integrations and standardized build processes.

- **Scalability and Flexibility:**  
  - Adaptations allow the system to scale with project growth without additional complexity.

- **Reduced Redundancy:**  
  - Centralized and reusable artifact definitions minimize code duplication, enhancing maintainability.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Maintaining consistency across all related repositories was crucial. By implementing similar refactoring strategies across different repositories, we ensured a cohesive and efficient system-wide operation, laying a solid foundation for further advancements in FORGE 2.0.

---

## Slide 8: Testing &amp; Validation

**Ensuring Robustness and Accuracy**

- **Execution Logs:**
  - **Verification:**  
    - Reviewed detailed logs to confirm successful execution of refactored genie wishes.
    - Confirmed that no overlapping or redundant artifacts were referenced.

- **Artifact Coverage Reports:**
  - **Validation:**  
    - Generated summarized reports demonstrating precise artifact referencing.
    - Ensured all conditional inclusions and exclusions were correctly implemented.
  
- **Jira Issue Resolutions:**
  - **Track &amp; Confirm:**  
    - Successfully closed related Jira issues ([SPRTORCAS-452](https://issues.tttech.com/browse/SPRTORCAS-452), [SPSTMW-827](https://issues.tttech.com/browse/SPSTMW-827)).
    - Documented all challenges and their corresponding resolutions within Jira for traceability.

- **Cross-Repository Testing:**
  - **Consistency Checks:**  
    - Ensured that all related repositories functioned correctly with the new artifact definitions.
    - Performed integrated build tests to validate system-wide compatibility.

- **Continuous Integration Pipelines:**
  - **Integration:**  
    - Updated CI pipelines to incorporate granular artifact definitions.
    - Monitored build times and success rates post-refactoring to gauge efficiency gains.

**Benefits:**

- **Confidence in System Stability:**  
  - Comprehensive testing ensures that the refactored system operates as intended without introducing new issues.
  
- **Traceability and Accountability:**  
  - Clear documentation and issue tracking enhance transparency and facilitate future audits or reviews.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Rigorous testing and validation were paramount to ensure that our refactoring efforts did not introduce new issues and that they effectively resolved the existing challenges. The positive outcomes from our testing phases confirm the robustness and reliability of the updated Genie Wishes Checker.

---

## Slide 9: Benefits Achieved

**Advantages of the Refactored System**

1. **Optimized Workflow Efficiency:**
   - **Parallel Execution:**  
     - Enabled independent genie wishes to execute concurrently, significantly reducing overall build times.
   - **Reduced Integration Time:**  
     - Only affected workflow steps are re-executed upon changes, speeding up Pull Requests and enhancing productivity.

2. **Enhanced Maintainability &amp; Scalability:**
   - **Modular Definitions:**  
     - Simplifies future updates and accommodates growing project complexity without significant restructuring.
   - **Reusability:**  
     - Centralized artifact definitions are reusable across multiple genies, minimizing duplication and easing maintenance efforts.

3. **Robust Artifact Management:**
   - **Precision &amp; Clarity:**  
     - Eliminates ambiguities in artifact referencing, ensuring that each genie wish operates on the intended components.
   - **Error Reduction:**  
     - Prevents incorrect artifact associations, reducing potential errors in code generation and build processes.

4. **Foundation for FORGE 2.0:**
   - **Scalable Framework:**  
     - Establishes a strong base for introducing advanced generation features supporting diverse SWC configurations.
   - **Future-Proofing:**  
     - Ensures the system can adapt to evolving requirements seamlessly, supporting long-term project sustainability.

**Benefits Highlighted:**

- **Increased Productivity:**  
  - Faster build times and streamlined workflows allow teams to focus more on development and less on maintenance.

- **Improved Quality:**  
  - Precise artifact definitions lead to more reliable and error-free code generation.

- **Scalability:**  
  - The system can easily accommodate new requirements and repositories without substantial rework.

*Speaker Notes:*  
The refactored Genie Wishes Checker has delivered significant benefits, from optimized workflow efficiency and enhanced maintainability to robust artifact management. These improvements not only address our immediate challenges but also pave the way for a scalable and future-proof FORGE 2.0 ecosystem.

---

## Slide 10: System Demo Highlights

**Showcasing the Improvements**

1. **Artifact Definition Precision:**
   - **Before vs. After:**  
     - **Before:** Broad directory-level artifact definitions leading to overlaps.
     - **After:** Granular file-level artifacts ensuring precise targeting.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Visual comparison of old vs. new artifact structures highlights the elimination of ambiguities.

2. **Refactored Genie Executions:**
   - **Specific Tool Arguments:**  
     - Demonstration of updated `genie.xml` configurations referencing precise artifacts.
   - **Conditional Executions:**  
     - Show how conditional logic in genie wishes adapts based on build parameters.

3. **Workflow Efficiency:**
   - **Parallel Execution:**  
     - Simulated or live demonstration of multiple genie wishes executing concurrently.
     - Highlight reduced build times and efficient resource utilization.
   - **Reduced Integration Steps:**  
     - Illustration of faster Pull Request validations due to optimized workflows.

4. **Error Handling:**
   - **Eliminated Overlaps:**  
     - Showcase logs or reports confirming the removal of previous overlapping artifacts and related errors.
   - **Stable Code Generation:**  
     - Demonstration of consistent and accurate C source code outputs without duplication or conflicts.

**Demo Steps:**

- **Step 1:**  
  - Present a screenshot or live view of the old vs. new artifact definitions.
  
- **Step 2:**  
  - Show updated `genie.xml` configurations with granular artifact references.
  
- **Step 3:**  
  - Simulate a build process highlighting parallel execution of independent genie wishes.
  
- **Step 4:**  
  - Display execution logs before and after refactoring to emphasize error elimination.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Let's delve into some practical demonstrations that highlight the tangible improvements achieved through our refactoring efforts. These visuals and simulations illustrate how precise artifact definitions and updated genie configurations enhance our workflows and overall system reliability.

---

## Slide 11: Lessons Learned &amp; Best Practices

**Insights from the Refactoring Process**

1. **Importance of Granularity:**
   - **Lesson:**  
     - Detailed artifact definitions prevent ambiguities and enhance precision.
   - **Best Practice:**  
     - Target artifacts at the individual file level to maintain clarity and facilitate automation.

2. **Consistent Configuration Management:**
   - **Lesson:**  
     - Uniformity across genie configurations eliminates discrepancies and reduces errors.
   - **Best Practice:**  
     - Maintain centralized and standardized configuration definitions across all repositories.

3. **Rigorous Testing &amp; Validation:**
   - **Lesson:**  
     - Comprehensive testing is crucial for identifying and resolving hidden issues.
   - **Best Practice:**  
     - Implement thorough validation processes and leverage artifact coverage reports regularly.

4. **Collaborative Cross-Team Efforts:**
   - **Lesson:**  
     - Successful refactoring requires collaboration across multiple teams and repositories.
   - **Best Practice:**  
     - Foster open communication and coordinated efforts when making system-wide changes.

5. **Adherence to Best Practices:**
   - **Lesson:**  
     - Following established best practices ensures system robustness and scalability.
   - **Best Practice:**  
     - Continuously align artifact definitions and genie configurations with evolving best practices and project requirements.

6. **Adaptability and Continuous Improvement:**
   - **Lesson:**  
     - Systems must evolve with project requirements to remain efficient and scalable.
   - **Best Practice:**  
     - Regularly review and update artifact definitions and genie configurations to align with current needs.

**Benefits of Adopting Best Practices:**

- **Enhanced Precision:**  
  - Clear and granular definitions lead to more reliable and maintainable systems.
  
- **Reduced Errors:**  
  - Standardized configurations minimize the risk of human errors and system inconsistencies.
  
- **Scalable Framework:**  
  - A flexible and well-maintained system can effortlessly adapt to new requirements and expansions.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Throughout this refactoring journey, we gleaned several critical insights that will guide our future endeavors. Embracing granularity, consistency, and rigorous testing are paramount for maintaining a robust and scalable system, ensuring that we remain agile and efficient as project demands evolve.

---

## Slide 12: Conclusion &amp; Next Steps

**Summary of Achievements**

- **Successful Refactoring:**  
  - Transitioned to granular artifact definitions.
  - Refactored genie configurations for enhanced precision and efficiency.

- **Optimized Workflows:**  
  - Enabled parallel execution of workflow steps.
  - Reduced integration times and improved productivity.

- **Robust Artifact Management:**  
  - Eliminated ambiguities and overlaps in artifact referencing.
  - Established a scalable and maintainable framework for FORGE 2.0.

**Path Forward**

1. **Monitoring &amp; Continuous Improvement:**
   - **Action:**  
     - Regularly review artifact definitions and genie configurations.
   - **Goal:**  
     - Ensure ongoing alignment with project requirements and scalability.

2. **Enhancing FORGE 2.0 Features:**
   - **Action:**  
     - Build upon the refactored framework to introduce new capabilities.
   - **Goal:**  
     - Deliver advanced generation features supporting diverse SWC configurations.

3. **Cross-Team Collaboration:**
   - **Action:**  
     - Continue fostering collaborative efforts across repositories.
   - **Goal:**  
     - Maintain consistency and efficiency in system-wide operations.

4. **Documentation &amp; Training:**
   - **Action:**  
     - Update documentation with new best practices and insights.
   - **Goal:**  
     - Equip teams with knowledge to sustain and enhance the system.

5. **Automated Monitoring Tools:**
   - **Action:**  
     - Implement automated tools to monitor artifact overlaps and integration health.
   - **Goal:**  
     - Proactively identify and resolve issues, ensuring system integrity.

**Benefits Moving Forward:**

- **Sustained Efficiency:**  
  - Ongoing optimizations will keep our workflows streamlined and responsive.
  
- **Scalability:**  
  - The system's ability to adapt to new requirements without significant upheaval.
  
- **Reliability:**  
  - Robust artifact management ensures consistent and error-free code generation.

*Speaker Notes:*  
In conclusion, the [COM-RTE] Genie Wishes Checker has significantly advanced our capabilities towards FORGE 2.0. Moving forward, our focus will be on continuous monitoring, enhancing FORGE 2.0 features, fostering cross-team collaboration, and ensuring thorough documentation and training to sustain and build upon our progress.

---

## Slide 13: Acknowledgments &amp; References

**Thank You!**

- **Acknowledgments:**
  - Special thanks to the development and architecture teams:
    - Alexandre Guerra
    - Genis Aguilar
    - Mario Anton
    - Julian Holzmüller
    - Tatjana Pecak
    - Diego Perez Larrañaga
    - Jose Ramon Garcia Perez
    - Fernando Onega Rodrigo

- **References:**
  - [Jira Issue: SPRTORCAS-452](https://issues.tttech.com/browse/SPRTORCAS-452)
  - [Jira Issue: SPSTMW-827](https://issues.tttech.com/browse/SPSTMW-827)
  - [Confluence Page: Workflow Step Checks](https://confluence.tttech.com/display/CONTX/Workflow+Step+Checks)
  - [Confluence Page: Analysis of Genie Wishes in COM-RTE](https://confluence.tttech.com/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=AUTOSPI&amp;title=Analysis+of+Genie+Wishes+in+COM-RTE)
  - [PR Review Cookbook](https://confluence.tttech.com/pages/viewpage.action?spaceKey=CONTX&amp;title=PR+Handbook+-+Overview)

*Speaker Notes:*  
I'd like to extend my heartfelt thanks to all team members who contributed to this project. Your support and collaboration were instrumental in achieving these milestones. Please refer to the provided links for more detailed information and documentation.

---

## Final Slide: Questions &amp; Discussion

**Any Questions?**

- Feel free to ask for clarifications or further details on any aspect of the Genie Wishes Checker and its impact on our workflows and FORGE 2.0.

*Speaker Notes:*  
Thank you for your attention. I'm now open to any questions or discussions you might have regarding this presentation.

---

# Notes for the Presenter

- **Time Allocation:**
  - **Slides 1-2:** 2 minutes
  - **Slides 3-4:** 2.5 minutes
  - **Slides 5-6:** 2.5 minutes
  - **Slides 7-8:** 2 minutes
  - **Slides 9-10:** 3 minutes
  - **Slides 11-12:** 2.5 minutes
  - **Slide 13 &amp; Final Slide:** 0.5 minutes

- **Demo Highlights:**
  - Incorporate live demonstrations or screenshots illustrating before-and-after scenarios of artifact definitions and genie configurations.
  - Showcase artifact coverage reports and execution logs to emphasize error elimination and workflow optimization.

- **Engagement:**
  - Encourage questions after the presentation to address specific technical interests or concerns.
  - Offer to provide additional technical documentation or hold follow-up sessions as needed.

- **Customization:**
  - Tailor the technical depth based on the management team's familiarity with the technical aspects.
  - Highlight how these technical improvements align with broader organizational goals and strategic initiatives.

---

# Additional Technical Details for Enhanced Bullet Points

To further enrich the presentation with technical depth, consider incorporating the following specifics into the respective slides:

### Slide 2: Introduction &amp; Motivation

- **Technical Challenges Identified:**
  1. **Inappropriate Artifact Definitions:**
     - **Specifics:**  
       `gen_data_platform` artifacts incorrectly pointed to directory paths (e.g., `.../Rte_TTTech`) instead of individual C source and header files.
     - **Consequence:**  
       - Generator scripts had to append specific file routes manually, leading to hard-coded paths and increased maintenance complexity.
  
  2. **Overlapping Artifact Paths:**
     - **Specifics:**  
       Single artifacts encompassed multiple file patterns (e.g., `Rte_[cp_swc]/*.c` and `Rte_[cp_swc]/*.h` under one `uri`).
     - **Consequence:**  
       - Resulted in the generation of duplicate or conflicting files across different genie wishes, causing build failures and inconsistent code bases.
  
  3. **Manual Route Appending:**
     - **Specifics:**  
       - Within generator scripts, output paths were constructed by concatenating directory artifacts with file-specific names.
     - **Consequence:**  
       - Introduced potential for path mismatches and errors, as well as making the system less adaptable to changes in directory structures.

  4. **Lack of Clear Input-Output Mapping:**
     - **Specifics:**  
       - Dependencies were implicitly handled through directory artifacts, making it challenging to map which specific outputs were prerequisites for subsequent wishes.
     - **Consequence:**  
       - Hindered the ability to identify independent workflow steps, thereby preventing effective parallelization and optimization.

### Slide 3: Challenges Faced

- **Detailed Technical Challenges:**

1. **Inappropriate Artifact Definitions:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - `gen_data_platform` artifacts defined broad directory paths, such as `.../Rte_TTTech`, instead of targeting individual files.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Required generator scripts to manually append specific file names (e.g., `Rte_[cp_swc].c`), leading to:
       - Hard-coded paths, reducing flexibility.
       - Increased likelihood of path resolution errors.
       - Higher maintenance overhead when directory structures evolve.

2. **Overlapping Artifact Paths:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Single artifacts included multiple file patterns within the same directory, e.g., both `.c` and `.h` files under `Rte_TTTech`.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Created overlapping outputs where multiple genie wishes might attempt to generate similar or conflicting files.
     - Resulted in build failures due to duplicate definitions and inconsistencies in generated code.

3. **Manual Route Appending:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Generator scripts appended routes manually to directory artifacts to specify output files.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Introduced rigid dependencies, making the system less adaptable.
     - Increased the risk of errors if directory structures or file naming conventions changed.
     - Complicated the automation process, as scripts needed updates in tandem with any structural changes.

4. **Lack of Clear Input-Output Mapping:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Dependencies between genie wishes were not explicitly defined due to broad artifact usage.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Obstructed the workflow engine's ability to identify which steps could run in parallel.
     - Led to a linear execution model, increasing total build and integration times.
     - Made debugging and tracing dependency issues more cumbersome.

5. **Violation of Best Practices for Wishes and Artifacts:**
   - **Issue:**  
     - Best practices advocate for defining artifacts at the individual file level to enhance clarity and automation.
     - The existing system's directory-level artifact definitions contradicted these principles.
   - **Impact:**  
     - Undermined the Genie Wishes framework's effectiveness in automating build processes.
     - Increased manual interventions, negating the benefits of an automated workflow system.
     - Compromised the scalability and flexibility of the generation framework.

---

By incorporating these technical specifics, the presentation will provide a clearer and more detailed understanding of the challenges and solutions, resonating well with a technically adept audience."
</presentation_suggestion>

<report_artifacts>
## **Detailed Comparison and Refactoring Report**

### **Introduction**

The transition from the `<old>` to the `<new>` `Artifacts.cue` files signifies a substantial overhaul in how artifacts are defined and managed within the system. While previous analysis highlighted modularization and maintainability improvements, a critical facet of this refactor is the **enhanced granularity** of artifact definitions. This granularity allows artifacts to reference specific files and accommodate variations in Software Components (SWCs), enabling more precise and flexible management of generated code segments.

---

### **Summary of Key Refactoring Changes**

1. **Increased Granularity in Artifact Definitions**
   - **Old Approach:** Utilized broad artifact definitions that encompassed multiple file patterns and paths within a single artifact.
   - **New Approach:** Introduced numerous granular artifacts, each pointing to specific file types or paths, accommodating variations in SWCs and enabling precise artifact references.

2. **Modularization of Common Artifacts**
   - Centralized the definition of frequently used artifacts, promoting reusability and reducing duplication.

3. **Simplified and Consistent Naming Conventions**
   - Adopted a clear and uniform naming scheme for artifacts, enhancing readability and maintainability.

4. **Enhanced Conditional Logic**
   - Streamlined the inclusion of artifacts based on host attributes and build capabilities, ensuring that only relevant artifacts are associated with each host.

---

### **Concrete Examples of Refactoring**

#### **1. Enhanced Granularity in Artifact Definitions**

##### **a. Old Artifact: `&quot;1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte_ASR&quot;`**

The `<old>` configuration utilized a single, broadly defined artifact to encompass various related files and patterns:

```cue
&quot;1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte_ASR&quot;: {
    uri: &quot;mxml:1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte_ASR&quot;
    visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
    locations: [
        {
            path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech&quot;
            pattern: &quot;Rte_[cp_swc]/*.c&quot;
        },
        {
            path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech&quot;
            pattern: &quot;Rte_[cp_swc]/*.h&quot;
        },
        {
            path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech/Rte_XCP&quot;
            pattern: &quot;*.h&quot;
        },
        // Additional patterns...
    ]
}
```

***Explanation:** This artifact aggregates multiple file types (`.c`, `.h`, etc.) across various directories under a single `uri`, making it less precise and harder to manage specific file references.*

##### **b. New Artifacts: Granular Definitions**

The `<new>` configuration breaks down the broad artifact into multiple specific artifacts, each targeting distinct file types and paths:

```cue
&quot;rte_const_c_common&quot;: {
    uri: &quot;mcl:rte_const_c_common&quot;
    visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
    locations: [
        {
            path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech&quot;
            pattern: &quot;Rte_[cp_swc].c&quot;
        }
    ]
}

&quot;rte_const_h_common&quot;: {
    uri: &quot;mcl:rte_const_h_common&quot;
    visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
    locations: [
        {
            path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech/Rte_Const&quot;
            pattern: &quot;Rte_Const.h&quot;
        }
    ]
}

&quot;rte_xcp_common&quot;: {
    uri: &quot;mcl:rte_xcp_common&quot;
    visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
    locations: [
        {
            path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech/Rte_XCP&quot;
        }
    ]
}

// Additional granular artifacts...
```

***Explanation:** Each new artifact targets a specific file type or directory, enabling precise references and easier management of individual code components.*

##### **c. Breaking Down Important Artifacts**

Another example is the refactoring of build-related artifacts:

- **Old Artifact: `&quot;1700_-_Build_-_Rte_TTTech_ASR&quot;`**

  ```cue
  &quot;1700_-_Build_-_Rte_TTTech_ASR&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mxml:1700_-_Build_-_Rte_TTTech_ASR&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/build/platform/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech&quot;
          },
      ]
      exclude_locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/build/platform/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech&quot;
              pattern: &quot;*.unit&quot;
          },
          // Additional exclusions...
      ]
  }
  ```

- **New Artifacts: Granular Build Components**

  ```cue
  &quot;rte_const_unit_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:rte_const_unit_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/build/platform/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech&quot;
              pattern: &quot;Rte_Const.unit&quot;
          }
      ]
  }

  &quot;rte_const_unit&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:rte_const_unit&quot;
      visibility: &quot;none&quot;
      artifacts: [
          for hostname, shortname in hostgroup if shortname =~ &quot;SH[0-9]+&quot; {
              system.ecus[ECU].hosts[hostname].artifacts.&quot;rte_const_unit_common&quot;,
          }
          // Inclusion for POSIX hosts if applicable
      ]
  }
  ```

***Explanation:** The original broad build artifact is now segmented into specific components, such as `&quot;rte_const_unit_common&quot;`, which specifically targets the `Rte_Const.unit` files. This segmentation facilitates focused management and enhances clarity.*

#### **2. New Granular Artifacts Catering to SWC Variations**

The refactored `<new>` configuration introduces numerous artifacts that account for Software Component (SWC) variations, enabling precise referencing of generated code segments.

##### **a. Example of Granular Artifacts**

- **Old Artifact: `&quot;1700_-_SWU_-_Remote_Access_Implementation_ASR&quot;`**

  ```cue
  &quot;1700_-_SWU_-_Remote_Access_Implementation_ASR&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:1700_-_SWU_-_RA_Implementation_ASR&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/core/SDK/SWU_RA/\(shortname)&quot;
              pattern: &quot;&quot;
          },
      ]
  }
  ```

- **New Graded Artefacts:**

  ```cue
  &quot;ra_client_header_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:ra_client_header_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/core/SDK/SWU_RA/\(shortname)&quot;
              pattern: &quot;Ra_Swu_Client_\(shortname).h&quot;
          }
      ]
  }

  &quot;ra_source_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:ra_source_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/core/SDK/SWU_RA/\(shortname)&quot;
              pattern: &quot;Ra_Swu_\(shortname).c&quot;
          }
      ]
  }

  &quot;ra_client_header&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:ra_client_header&quot;
      visibility: &quot;none&quot;
      artifacts: [
          for hostname, shortname in hostgroup if shortname =~ &quot;SH[0-9]+&quot; {
              system.ecus[ECU].hosts[hostname].artifacts.&quot;ra_client_header_common&quot;,
          }
          // Inclusion for POSIX hosts if applicable
      ]
  }

  &quot;ra_source&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:ra_source&quot;
      visibility: &quot;none&quot;
      artifacts: [
          for hostname, shortname in hostgroup if shortname =~ &quot;SH[0-9]+&quot; {
              system.ecus[ECU].hosts[hostname].artifacts.&quot;ra_source_common&quot;,
          }
          // Inclusion for POSIX hosts if applicable
      ]
  }
  ```

***Explanation:** Instead of a single artifact encompassing all remote access implementation files, the refactor introduces separate artifacts for client headers (`&quot;ra_client_header_common&quot;`), server headers, and source files. This allows each artifact to precisely reference its relevant file, accommodating specific `SWC` variations and facilitating targeted management.*

##### **b. Handling Specific SWC Variations**

- **Old Configuration:** Limited ability to differentiate between various SWC components within a single artifact.

  ```cue
  &quot;1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte_ASR&quot;: {
      // Multiple patterns covering different SWCs
  }
  ```

- **New Configuration: Granular Artifacts for SWC Variations**

  ```cue
  &quot;rte_cpap_middleware_asil_c_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:rte_cpap_middleware_asil_c_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech/Rte_CpApMiddlewareASIL_\(shortname)&quot;
              pattern: &quot;Rte_CpApMiddlewareASIL_\(shortname)_Init.c&quot;
          }
      ]
  }

  &quot;rte_cpap_middleware_asil_swc_c_common&quot;: {
      uri: &quot;mcl:rte_cpap_middleware_asil_swc_c_common&quot;
      visibility: &quot;internal&quot;
      locations: [
          {
              path: &quot;\(system.ecus[ECU].general_config.config_locations[&quot;generated_config&quot;])/rte/\(shortname)/Rte_TTTech/Rte_CpApMiddlewareASIL_\(shortname)&quot;
              pattern: &quot;Rte_CpApMiddlewareASIL_\(shortname)_[cp_swc].c&quot;
          }
      ]
  }
  ```

***Explanation:** These new artifacts specifically target middleware implementation files for different SWC types, ensuring that each component is individually referenced and managed. This level of granularity allows for precise control over artifact inclusion based on SWC variations.*

---

### **Benefits of Increased Granularity**

1. **Precise Artifact Referencing**
   - Enables targeting specific files or directories without ambiguity, reducing the risk of incorrect artifact associations.

2. **Enhanced Flexibility in Handling SWC Variations**
   - Accommodates diverse SWC configurations and requirements by allowing tailored artifact definitions.

3. **Simplified Debugging and Maintenance**
   - Isolating artifacts to specific components facilitates easier identification and resolution of issues related to particular code segments.

4. **Improved Scalability**
   - As the system evolves with new SWCs or file patterns, granular artifacts can be added or modified without impacting unrelated configurations.

---

### **Additional Refactoring Improvements**

While the increased granularity is a cornerstone of the refactoring, several other improvements contribute to the overall enhancement of the configuration:

1. **Modularization and Reusability**
   - **Old Approach:** Repetitive artifact definitions for different host types.
   - **New Approach:** Common artifacts (e.g., `&quot;swc_list_rte_tttech_common&quot;`, `&quot;rte_memlayout_common&quot;`) are defined once and reused across multiple hosts and ECUs, minimizing duplication.

2. **Consistent Naming Conventions**
   - Transitioned from verbose and inconsistent names (e.g., `&quot;1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte_ASR&quot;`) to clear and descriptive names reflecting their functionality and scope (e.g., `&quot;rte_const_c_common&quot;`, `&quot;ra_client_header_common&quot;`).

3. **Streamlined Conditional Logic**
   - Centralized conditional checks ensure that artifacts are only included for relevant hosts based on `shortname` patterns and build capabilities, enhancing the robustness of the configuration.

4. **Consolidation of ECU-Level Artifacts**
   - Aggregated artifact references at the ECU level simplify the mapping and association of artifacts, making the configuration more organized and easier to navigate.

---

### **Conclusion**

The refactoring from the `<old>` to the `<new>` `Artifacts.cue` file exemplifies a strategic enhancement in configuration management through **increased granularity** and **modularization**. By defining numerous specific artifacts that cater to individual file types and SWC variations, the new configuration achieves a higher level of precision and flexibility. This, coupled with consistent naming conventions and streamlined conditional logic, results in a more maintainable, scalable, and robust system. The refactored configuration not only addresses immediate needs for detailed artifact management but also lays a solid foundation for future expansions and modifications.
</report_artifacts>

<report_genies>
## **Refactoring Report: `genie.xml` Files with Emphasis on `sc_rte_all`**

### **Introduction**

The `genie.xml` files orchestrate tool executions by leveraging defined artifacts within the system. The transition from the `<old>` to the `<new>` `genie.xml` files represents a significant enhancement in configuration management, particularly focusing on the `sc_rte_all` execution. This refactoring emphasizes **increased granularity** in artifact management, improved naming conventions, enhanced conditional logic, and overall maintainability. Additionally, other genie executions have been refined to align with these improvements, ensuring a cohesive and efficient configuration framework.

---

### **Summary of Key Refactoring Changes**

1. **Increased Granularity in Artifact Management**
   - **Old Approach:** Broad artifact references encompassed multiple file types and paths within single executions, limiting precision.
   - **New Approach:** Introduced numerous granular artifacts, each targeting specific file types or paths, accommodating Software Component (SWC) variations and enabling precise artifact management.

2. **Modularization and Reusability**
   - Centralized the definition of common artifacts, promoting their reuse across multiple tool executions and genie definitions, thereby reducing redundancy.

3. **Enhanced Conditional Logic**
   - Streamlined conditional statements to ensure that artifacts are included based on specific host attributes and build capabilities, enhancing the flexibility and robustness of tool executions.

4. **Consistent Naming Conventions**
   - Adopted clear and uniform naming schemes for artifacts and genie executions, improving readability and ease of maintenance.

5. **Consolidation of Execution Environments**
   - Maintained a consistent and organized structure for `execution_environment` sections across genies, ensuring uniformity and simplifying future configurations.

---

### **Detailed Comparison and Changes**

#### **1. Focus on `sc_rte_all` Execution**

The `sc_rte_all` execution is pivotal as it orchestrates the generation of TTTech RTE components. The refactoring introduces significant changes to this genie, enhancing its efficiency and precision through granular artifact management.

##### **a. Old `sc_rte_all` Genie Definition**

Below is the complete definition of the `sc_rte_all` genie in the `<old>` `genie.xml` file:

```xml
<wish name=&quot;sc_rte_all&quot;>
    <description>
        <p>name: Generate TTTech Rte</p>
        <p>Responsible: AD_PF_iCOM</p>
    </description>
    <properties>
        <property key=&quot;SC-Step&quot; />
        <property key=&quot;Service&quot;>MotionWise Com RTE Service</property>
        <property key=&quot;Stage&quot;>OS and RTE Configuration</property>
        <property key=&quot;Process&quot;>Configuration</property>
        <property key=&quot;Step&quot;>Generation of the TTTech Rte</property>
        <property key=&quot;Execution_Scope&quot;>ecu</property>
        <property key=&quot;Workflow&quot;>all</property>
    </properties>
    <execution_environment>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/Generators</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/Units/trtec/Contract_Header/generator/</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/RTE_MBD</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:object_model}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:com_data_model}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:com_data_model}/Units</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:parsers}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:parsers}/cmatrix_parser</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:tools_utilities}/python/libraries</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:scheduling_toolset}/classic/data_unit_allocator/lib/python</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:scheduling_toolset}/computation-chain-utilities/lib/python</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:scheduling_toolset}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>logging_error_reporting</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>jinja2</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>numpy</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>xlwt</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>deprecated</extend>
    </execution_environment>
    <tool engine=&quot;python&quot; environment=&quot;3&quot;>
        <arg>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/Generators/_MWC/sc_rte_all.py</arg>
        <arg>--ecu_name {PARAM:ECU_name}</arg>
        <arg>--cmatrix {INPUT:mxml:1700_-_Core_-_com_matrix#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- Temporal fix on gen_data_platform for MultiECU feature to be corrected in SPTSHRIMP-1342 and SPTSHRIMP-1444-->
        <arg>--gen_data_platform {OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Rte_-_Rte_ExtProfileID#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
    </tool>
    <post_actions>
        <tool engine=&quot;manual&quot;>
            <arg>###Workaround for adding a detailed list of input and output files which can't be added as an argument to the tool section at the moment###</arg>
            <arg>{INPUT:mxml:1900_-_Core_-_MOM_skeleton}</arg>
            <arg>{INPUT:mxml:1900_-_OS_BSW__ASR_ECUC_ECUC#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>{INPUT:mxml:1900_-_Core_-_Middleware_MWTL_Frame_Placeholders}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Build_-_Rte_TTTech#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}?dirname=true}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:mw_shmsvc_cfg#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:icomdbg#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}?dirname=true}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Rte_-_Srv_Stubs#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}?dirname=true}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Rte_-_TTTech_Rte#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Rte_-_Rte_ExtProfileID#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Build_-_Rte_-_Contract_Headers#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Mbu_-_Mbu_Data#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>{OUTPUT:mxml:1700_-_Build_-_Mbu_Data#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <conditional_args>
                <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>BC_CCMONITOR</condition>
                <arg>{INPUT:mcl:Generated_-_computation_chain_monitoring_all_hosts#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
                <arg>{INPUT:mcl:schedtools_input}</arg>
            </conditional_args>
        </tool>
    </post_actions>
</wish>
```

**Characteristics:**
- **Broad Tool Arguments:** The `sc_rte_all.py` script is invoked with general parameters that reference multiple artifacts collectively.
- **Temporal Fixes:** Includes temporary workarounds within `post_actions`, such as handling detailed lists of input and output files.
- **Less Granularity:** Artifacts are less granular, making it harder to manage specific file references and variations.

##### **b. New `sc_rte_all` Genie Definition**

Below is the complete updated definition of the `sc_rte_all` genie in the `<new>` `genie.xml` file:

```xml
<wish name=&quot;sc_rte_all&quot;>
    <description>
        <p>name: Generate TTTech Rte</p>
        <p>Responsible: AD_PF_iCOM</p>
    </description>
    <properties>
        <property key=&quot;SC-Step&quot; />
        <property key=&quot;Service&quot;>MotionWise Com RTE Service</property>
        <property key=&quot;Stage&quot;>OS and RTE Configuration</property>
        <property key=&quot;Process&quot;>Configuration</property>
        <property key=&quot;Step&quot;>Generation of the TTTech Rte</property>
        <property key=&quot;Execution_Scope&quot;>ecu</property>
        <property key=&quot;Workflow&quot;>all</property>
    </properties>
    <execution_environment>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/Generators</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/Units/trtec/Contract_Header/generator/</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/RTE_MBD</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:object_model}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:com_data_model}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:com_data_model}/Units</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:parsers}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:parsers}/cmatrix_parser</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:tools_utilities}/python/libraries</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:scheduling_toolset}/classic/data_unit_allocator/lib/python</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:scheduling_toolset}/computation-chain-utilities/lib/python</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;PYTHONPATH&quot;>{CAMEL:scheduling_toolset}</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>logging_error_reporting</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>jinja2</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>numpy</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>xlwt</extend>
        <extend name=&quot;requirements.txt&quot;>deprecated</extend>
    </execution_environment>
    <tool engine=&quot;python&quot; environment=&quot;3&quot;>
        <arg>{CAMEL:motionwise_com_rte}/Generators/_MWC/sc_rte_all.py</arg>
        <arg>--ecu_name {PARAM:ECU_name}</arg>
        <arg>--cmatrix {INPUT:mxml:1700_-_Core_-_com_matrix#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_shmsvc_yaml -->
        <arg>--shm_size_pp {ARTIFACT:mcl:shm_size_pp#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <conditional_args>
            <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
            <arg>--mw_shmsvc_cfg {OUTPUT:mxml:mw_shmsvc_cfg#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        </conditional_args>

        <!-- sc_rte_memlayout -->
        <arg>--rte_memlayout {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_memlayout#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_rte -->
        <arg>--rte_const_c {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_const_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--rte_const_h {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_const_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--rte_c {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--rte_internal_h {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_internal_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--mbu_data_c {OUTPUT:mcl:mbu_data_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--mbu_data_h {OUTPUT:mcl:mbu_data_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--is_producer_muted_c {OUTPUT:mcl:is_producer_muted_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--is_producer_muted_h {OUTPUT:mcl:is_producer_muted_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--mbu_cpap_middleware_asil_c {OUTPUT:mcl:mbu_cpap_middleware_asil_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--mbu_cpap_middleware_asil_h {OUTPUT:mcl:mbu_cpap_middleware_asil_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--rte_cpap_middleware_asil_c {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_cpap_middleware_asil_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--rte_cpap_middleware_asil_swc_c {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_cpap_middleware_asil_swc_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--rte_extprofileid {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_extprofileid#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_rte_cfg -->
        <arg>--rte_cfg_h {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_cfg_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_rte_no_model -->
        <arg>--rte_c_no_model {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_c_no_model#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_rte_xcp -->
        <arg>--rte_xcp {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_xcp#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--rte_xcp_h {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_xcp_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_sh -->
        <arg>--rte_sc_host_fullname {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_sc_host_fullname#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_srv_stubs -->
        <conditional_args>
            <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
            <arg>--rte_srv_stubs {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_srv_stubs#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--rte_srv_stubs_non_modelled {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_srv_stubs_non_modelled#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        </conditional_args>
        
        <!-- sc_swu_data_types -->
        <conditional_args>
            <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
            <arg>--swu_mbu_data_type {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_mbu_data_type#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_dh_data_type {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_dh_data_type#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        </conditional_args>

        <!-- sc_swu_docu_gen -->
        <conditional_args>
            <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
            <arg>--swu_docu_client_c {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_docu_client_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_docu_server_c {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_docu_server_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_docu_h {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_docu_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_docu_data_c {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_docu_data_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_docu_data_h {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_docu_data_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_docu_data_type_h {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_docu_data_type_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <!-- Not implemented: swu_docu_trusted {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_docu_trusted_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}} -->
        </conditional_args>
        
        <!-- sc_unit_files -->
        <arg>--rte_const_unit {OUTPUT:mcl:rte_const_unit#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--sw_units {OUTPUT:mcl:sw_units#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--swc_list {OUTPUT:mcl:swc_list#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--swc_unit_files_rte_tttech {OUTPUT:mcl:swc_unit_files_rte_tttech#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--swc_unit_files_mbu {OUTPUT:mcl:swc_unit_files_mbu#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        <arg>--swc_unit_files_rte_ch {OUTPUT:mcl:swc_unit_files_rte_ch#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>

        <!-- sc_swu -->
        <conditional_args>
            <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
            <arg>--swu_client_c {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_client_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_server_c {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_server_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_server_h {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_server_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_h {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_data_c {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_data_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_data_h {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_data_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <!-- Not supported: swu_trusted_c {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_trusted_c#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}} -->
            <!-- Not supported: swu_trusted_h {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_trusted_h#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}} -->
            <!-- Not supported: swu_tttech_srv_rnbl_units {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_tttech_srv_rnbl_units#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}} -->
            <arg>--swu_tttech_units {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_tttech_units#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
            <arg>--swu_tttech_swc_list {OUTPUT:mcl:swu_tttech_swc_list#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}}</arg>
        </conditional_args>

        <!-- sc_icomdbg -->
        <conditional_args>
            <condition engine=&quot;build_cap_condition&quot; context=&quot;ECU={PARAM:ECU_name}&quot;>!BC_CONTAINS_SOA_HOST</condition>
            <arg>--icomdbg {OUTPUT:mxml:icomdbg#system/{PARAM:ECU_name}?dirname=true}</arg>
        </conditional_args>
    </tool>
</wish>
```

**Key Enhancements:**
- **Granular Argument Passing:** Instead of passing a broad set of artifacts through singular arguments, `sc_rte_all` now references each artifact individually using specific `--arg` parameters. This allows for more precise control over which artifacts are utilized during execution.
- **Comprehensive Artifact List:** The updated genie definition includes an extensive list of artifacts, each serving a distinct purpose. While specific artifacts are detailed in previous reports, the overall structure ensures that every necessary component is individually addressed.
- **Conditional Inclusion of Artifacts:** Leveraging conditional statements, certain artifacts are included based on specific build capabilities or host attributes. This ensures that only relevant artifacts are processed, enhancing efficiency and reducing potential errors.
- **Elimination of Temporal Fixes:** The previous workaround within `post_actions` has been streamlined, with issues being addressed through granular configurations rather than temporary measures.

##### **c. Differences Between Old and New `sc_rte_all` Genies**

| Aspect                      | Old `sc_rte_all` Genie                              | New `sc_rte_all` Genie                                                  |
|-----------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **Artifact Referencing**    | Broad, grouped artifacts passed as general arguments| Granular, specific artifacts passed individually as distinct arguments  |
| **Post-Actions**            | Included temporary workarounds for file references  | Streamlined, with removal of temporal fixes and precise artifact usage  |
| **Conditional Logic**       | Minimal, scattered conditions in post-actions        | Enhanced, with clear conditional inclusion based on build capabilities  |
| **Tool Arguments**          | Less precise, multiple artifacts grouped together    | Highly precise, each artifact is distinctly referenced                  |
| **Maintainability**         | Lower due to broad and repetitive configurations    | Higher due to granular, reusable artifact definitions                    |
| **Scalability**             | Limited scalability due to complexity and redundancy| Improved scalability with modular and reusable components                |

---

#### **2. Notable Changes in Other Genie Executions**

While the `sc_rte_all` genie is the primary focus of this refactoring, other genie executions have also undergone meaningful enhancements to align with the improved artifact management strategy.

##### **a. `gen_COM_RTE` Genie**

- **Old Configuration:** Remained largely similar between the old and new configurations, primarily relying on the general artifact structure.
  
- **New Configuration:** Integrates seamlessly with the granular artifacts, ensuring that individual components are accurately referenced and utilized during execution.

##### **b. `sc_TTT_Implementation_Templates` Genie**

- **Old Configuration:** Utilized broader tool arguments and artifact references, encompassing multiple components within singular executions.
  
- **New Configuration:**
  - **Granular Artifact References:** Each template generation argument now references specific artifacts, enhancing precision.
  - **Consistent Integration:** Aligns with the new artifact structure, facilitating easier maintenance and updates.
  
- **Impact:** Enables more targeted generation of implementation templates, accommodating various SWC variations effectively.

##### **c. `sc_Swu_ra` Genie**

- **Old Configuration:** Managed SWU RA generation with less precise artifact references, potentially leading to overlaps or omissions.
  
- **New Configuration:**
  - **Granular Artifact References:** Specific artifacts related to RA client headers, server headers, sources, and unit tests are individually referenced.
  - **Conditional Artifact Inclusion:** Artifacts are included based on build capabilities, ensuring relevance and reducing unnecessary processing.
  
- **Impact:** Enhances the robustness and precision of SWU RA generation, minimizing errors and improving maintainability.

---

### **Benefits of the Refactored `genie.xml` Configuration**

1. **Precision and Flexibility**
   - **Granular Artifact Referencing:** Enables exact targeting of specific files and directories, accommodating diverse SWC variations and reducing ambiguity in tool executions.

2. **Improved Maintainability**
   - **Centralized Artifact Definitions:** Simplifies updates and modifications by allowing changes in a single artifact definition to propagate across all relevant genie executions.
   - **Consistent Naming Conventions:** Enhances readability and understanding, facilitating easier navigation and management of configurations.

3. **Scalability**
   - **Easily Extensible:** New artifacts and genie executions can be added without disrupting existing configurations, supporting the system's growth and evolution.

4. **Reduced Redundancy**
   - **Reusable Modules:** Common artifacts and configurations are defined once and reused across multiple genies, minimizing duplicate code and potential inconsistencies.

5. **Enhanced Readability and Organization**
   - **Clear Structure:** Organized sections and consistent formatting make the `genie.xml` files easier to read, comprehend, and troubleshoot.

6. **Robust Conditional Handling**
   - **Dynamic Configuration:** Artifacts and tool executions adapt based on specific conditions, ensuring that only relevant components are processed, enhancing the overall robustness of the system.

---

### **Conclusion**

The refactoring of the `genie.xml` files, particularly the `sc_rte_all` genie, represents a strategic advancement in configuration management. By introducing **increased granularity** in artifact definitions, the new configuration allows for more precise and flexible tool executions, effectively accommodating various SWC variations. Coupled with **modularization**, **consistent naming conventions**, and **enhanced conditional logic**, the refactored `genie.xml` files achieve higher levels of maintainability, scalability, and robustness. These improvements not only streamline current workflows but also establish a solid foundation for future enhancements and expansions within the system.

---

*For detailed examples of the specific artifact definitions and their granular structures, please refer to the previous reports.*
</report_genies>