You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Xcode provides a great experience when developing Swift applications on macOS, but as Swift matures and becomes more popular on Linux there is a strong need for a first-class experience when developing on Linux too.

In this guide, I’ll show how to use the Visual Studio Code Remote extension to develop your Swift application on macOS or Windows, while running in a Linux Docker container. You’ll have full IntelliSense thanks to SourceKit-LSP and debugging thanks to CodeLLDB.

Debugging a remote Docker container using VS Code on macOS

VS Code Remote is an extension you can install into VS Code. Once installed, if your project contains a .devcontainer directory VS Code will give you the option of running your project in “remote mode”.

In remote mode, your local VS Code talks to a remote Docker container which runs a “VS Code Server” that launches your application. Extensions like SourceKit-LSP and LLDBCode run in the remote VS Code Server, not your local VS Code.

VS Code Remote architecture

So, what should you put in your .devcontainer directory? Two files are required: devcontainer.json and Dockerfile .

devcontainer.json

Here’s an example devcontainer.json :

{

"name": "Swift",

"dockerFile": "Dockerfile", "runArgs": [

"--cap-add=SYS_PTRACE",

"--security-opt", "seccomp=unconfined"], // Uncomment the next line if you want to publish any ports.

// "appPort": [8080, 1234], "extensions": [

"pvasek.sourcekit-lsp--dev-unofficial",

"vadimcn.vscode-lldb"], "settings": {

"lldb.adapterType": "bundled",

"lldb.executable": "/usr/bin/lldb",

"terminal.integrated.shell.linux": "/bin/bash"

}

}

Let’s break this down.

"name": — a human-readable name for this devcontainer. It’s shown in the VS Code interface when you launch your container.

"dockerFile": — the name of your Dockerfile . Just use "Dockerfile" , it’s the convention.

"appPort": — here you can specify if you want any ports to be opened in the container. You’d do this if your application is a server that you want to be able to connect to from outside the container.

"runArgs": — the arguments that VS Code should pass to docker run when it runs your container. In the case of Swift we need to give the container some elevated privileges so that LLDB can use the ptrace() system call to attach to your running application.

"extensions": — extensions from the VS Code Marketplace that should be installed in the VS Code Server in the container. In this case, we install SourceKit-LSP (which provides IntelliSense) and CodeLLDB (which provides debugging).

"settings": — configuration options for the VS Code extensions you are installing. In this case, CodeLLDB needs to be told where to find lldb inside the container, and we also teach VS Code how to run a shell inside the container.

That’s it. Now we just need to write our Dockerfile alongside devcontainer.json and we are good to go!

Dockerfile

You can write any Dockerfile you want, but the simplest way is just to use the official Swift Docker image:

FROM swift:5.1

That’s it!

Launching

Once you’ve installed the VS Code Remote Containers extension, when you open up a project that contains a .devcontainer directory, VS Code prompts you to reopen your project using the container.

VS Code spots the .devcontainer directory in your project

The first time you do this, VS Code will build the Docker image. After that, the image is cached for reuse. Then, VS Code will run the container and connect to it.

You now have a full remote Swift development experience including IntelliSense and debugging!

Example Code

I’ve put together an example project showing how this works:

You should be able to install the extension into your VS Code, then clone this project and open it in VS Code and try it out!

Feedback

If you’ve got feedback on this article, please do tweet me: https://twitter.com/alfa