System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
Predict the discourse marker continuation\n"Accordingly neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "This, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Because of this neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Because of that neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Interestingly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Unsurprisingly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Preferably, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Sadly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Afterward neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."
    "Lately, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."

[Ground truth Answer]
Sadly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article.

[Assistant's Response]
To predict suitable discourse marker continuations for the sentence "Neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article," we can consider various markers that introduce different nuances or contextual implications. Here are some refined options based on the provided markers, along with explanations of their connotations:

1. **Accordingly**: "Accordingly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This suggests that the outcome is a logical consequence of prior events or decisions.

2. **This**: "This means that neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This clarifies the implication of the previous statement, emphasizing its importance.

3. **Because of this**: "Because of this, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This indicates that the outcome is directly tied to previously discussed reasons or events.

4. **Because of that**: "Because of that, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - Similar to the previous marker, it connects the outcome to specific prior circumstances.

5. **Interestingly**: "Interestingly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This suggests that the outcome was unexpected or noteworthy, perhaps surprising to the audience.

6. **Unsurprisingly**: "Unsurprisingly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This indicates that the outcome was anticipated and aligns with expectations.

7. **Preferably**: "Preferably, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This implies a sense of desire or preference for a different outcome, suggesting that the current situation is not ideal.

8. **Sadly**: "Sadly, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This conveys disappointment regarding the outcome, indicating a sense of loss or regret.

9. **Afterward**: "Afterward, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
   - This suggests that the decision was made following a series of events, highlighting a temporal relationship.

10. **Lately**: "Lately, neither the shorts, nor I, made the final cut for the RW article."  
    - This implies that the situation has been recent or ongoing, perhaps indicating a pattern or trend.

Each of these discourse markers serves to frame the statement in a different light, affecting its emotional tone and the implications drawn from it. Depending on the context in which you wish to use the sentence, you can select a marker that best fits the intended message.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: