1_ Translate the following legal text into colloquial Farsi 2_ Place the Persian and English text side by side in the table 3_ From the beginning to the end of the text, there should be an English sentence on the left side and a Persian sentence on the right side.
       4- Using legal language for Persian translation

          .To appreciate the significance of the Commission of Assize we should remember that whenever a plaintiff wished to bring an action in a civil matter against another person he had to obtain a writ from the Lord Chancellor's writ office and serve it on his opponent. The writ commanded the defendant and the plaintiff to attend the royal courts at Westminster on a certain date, unless before that date (nisi prius) the King's justices could hear the case locally, i.e. where the action arose. Attendance at Westminster was itself no easy matter in those days; journeys were long, delay in London was likely and witnesses could not always be found to attend. So a local hearing by the royal judges was a useful and attractive expedient readily grasped by those who could not obtain justice in the manorial court or other local courts - which were frequently corrupt, partial, and unfair.
Here, then, were the royal judges, known as itinerant justices, granting better justice which naturally proved popular with the people. Henry II (1154-89) reorganized the system by dividing the country into circuits and putting the excursions from Westminster on a regular basis.
We have seen that the judges were originally men appointed from the King's Council; they might be bishops, barons, or knights. Behind them stood the royal power as evidenced by the King's Commissions.
The original justices were for the most part untrained in law. When they visited a county court (the shires became counties after the Normans) they had to ascertain the customs applicable to the local court. The royal judges then applied the law thus discovered from the inhabitants. The twelfth and thirteenth centuries saw the introduction of juries. Juries were made up of local people who knew the facts of the local cases and the local customs rele- vant thereto, so that the justices could then enforce these customs in the name of the King.
On completing their circuits, the justices returned to the royal courts at Westminster. There they discussed together the customs ascertained in vari- ous parts of the country and their findings. By a process of sifting these cus- toms, rejecting those which were unreasonable and accepting those which were not, and by the use of good sense and right reason, they formed a uni- form pattern of customary law throughout England.
At the same time another important practice grew up: the judges began to apply the principle of stare decisis (let the decision stand'). Whenever a new problem of law came to be decided a rule was formed and this rule was fol- lowed subsequently by all other judges. By this means the law became more certain and predictable, and acquired the character of a legal system. So, out of the varied and different customs, there was formed what is now known as
the common law of England, so called because it is the law common to all parts of England and Wales.
It is estimated that the formation of the common law was complete by about 1250 when Bracton wrote his famous Treatise on the Laws and Customs of England, which was the first exposition of a part of the law that was destined to reach all parts of the world.