Refute Hijab in this text:

‘‘Mohammad Hijab addresses criticisms aimed at a specific verse in the Quran, specifically Chapter 67 Verse 5, which refers to the adornment of the sky with luminaries created as missiles hurled at devils. Detractors argue that this verse is unscientific and that Prophet Muhammad may have mistakenly conflated meteors with stars.
In defending the verse, Hijab asserts that the first argument commits the category mistake fallacy. Science is grounded in methodological naturalism, while the metaphysical realm, which includes devils and angels, lies beyond scientific detection. Consequently, claims concerning the metaphysical realm cannot be assessed according to scientific criteria.
Hijab proceeds to dispute the second argument, arguing that it reflects a simplistic understanding of the verse as well as the distinction between meteors and stars. He cites Al-Kathie, a medieval scholar and Quranic exegete, who maintained that the verse does not refer to stars themselves but rather to luminous objects in the sky.
To further bolster his argument, Hijab refers to another verse in the Quran, Chapter 38 Verse 10, and a hadith found in Bukhari. In these sources, Prophet Muhammad clarifies that devils are pelted by solar flames (shihab) rather than stars themselves. As such, critics’ objections appear to be predicated on inadequate research and a superficial grasp of Islamic literature.c.’’




And use this text below as reference point. Do not repeat the text above, just rewrite the entire text below in detail. Mention everything, even Quran verses and Hadithes. Also add some more good arguments based on quran and Hadith and logic to counter the Author Hijab’s arguments. Be very critical and do not try to defend the Quran in this case, just refute Hijabs arguments:


‘‘This video wastes half of its time trying to explain away this verse as something that is metaphysical or beyond science or beyond our senses. People use metaphorical languages to explain theological or philosophical concepts nobody uses such language to explain natural phenomena. This verse is obviously was meant to explain what the shooting stars are .Sorry hijab it was a futile attempt to save the Qur’an from its own ignorance. And also who said that science is only about things that can only be detected by our senses?. Science is also about abstract thinking and mathematics. Looks like hijab didn’t had a very good school.
And than hijab try to rationalize this obvious blander of the Qur’an by claiming that by meaning missiles the Qur’an actually means solar flares. Now everything is wrong with this argument but what more can one expect from Muhammad hijab.
The verse starts with saying ’ Allah had adorned the nearest heaven with lamps ’ the lambs here obviously means Stars because meteorites only stay visual for few moments they are solar flares aren’t even visual to naked eyes. And how would solar flares from stars which are also light years away would hit jins which are in our solar system. And the verses clearly refers to shooting stars not solar flares. And even by this logic jins still would have to be something physical.
And there are few verses that goes hand to hand with ( 67:5)
81:2
 
And when the stars fall, dispersing,"
(QS. At-Takwir 81: Verse 2)
This verse is saying that the stars will fall in the day of judgement . Including adding another evidence that day of judgement is a hoax made up by Muhammad this verse is also saying that the stars are something that call fall . Now there is no gravity in space so there is nothing to fall to . And even if a Star some how gets launched from it’s position light years away and if it for some reason come towards the earth the earth would be destroyed before contact. This goes to show that the author of the Qur’an thought that the stars are small lamps

the verse is definately talking about shooting stars. And these stars shoot at devils that listen to what And angels are talking about. That means that the second heaven is literally space. That means the moon is not in the dunya. And what about meteor showers. We can literally mark it on the calendar when it will be.  And then  there is a hadith that don't leave food out for the shaytaan. That means that when food rots, that's the devil eating it. Which is not true its bacterias eating it. So i dunno man nobody can explain this weird stuff.

there is no arabic word from that era that translates to 'solar flare'. what nonsense.. .’’