System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
You will be given an objective and a set of basic actions listed in random order required to accomplish the objective. Determine the correct sequence of actions to successfully achieve the goal.\nGoal: Walk through the aisles\nActions:\n- Take list out of pocket\n- Compare grocery prices\n- compare grocery brands\n- Browse the list\n- Check aisles for needed groceries\n- Walk through the aisles\n- Pick out the groceries

[Ground truth Answer]
step0: Walk through the aisles\nstep1: Take list out of pocket\nstep2: Compare grocery prices\nstep3: Pick out the groceries\nstep4: Browse the list\nstep5: Check aisles for needed groceries\nstep6: compare grocery brands

[Assistant's Response]
To successfully achieve the goal of walking through the aisles and completing your grocery shopping efficiently, the actions should be performed in the following sequence:

1. **Take list out of pocket**: Start by retrieving your shopping list to ensure you know what items you need to buy.

2. **Browse the list**: Review the list to familiarize yourself with the items you need, helping you plan your route through the store.

3. **Check aisles for needed groceries**: As you walk through the store, identify the aisles where your listed items are located.

4. **Compare grocery prices**: Once you find the items, compare prices to ensure you are getting the best deal possible.

5. **Compare grocery brands**: Evaluate different brands of the same item to decide which offers the best value or quality.

6. **Pick out the groceries**: Select the items you have decided to purchase based on your comparisons.

7. **Walk through the aisles**: Continue walking through the aisles to complete your shopping, using your list as a guide to ensure you don't miss any items.

This sequence ensures that you are organized, make informed decisions, and efficiently navigate through the store. Happy shopping!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: