System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
2 / 2Give me a brief scenario of a persona that would search this information and find this content helpful: {NSW Residential Building Contract for Small Works over $20,000 Designed for residential building work which is not complex over $20,000. Suitable for smaller alteration and renovation projects. Small Works Contracts (Form 10A) Pricing structure Fixed price Value range Under $7,500 Use for Minor residential alterations and additions work Includes Succinct, plain-language conditions suitable for very small, low-risk projects in place of a quotation}

Please write in English language.

[Ground truth Answer]
Meet Sarah, a busy mother of two, looking to make some renovations to her family home in New South Wales. Sarah and her partner have decided to expand their living space by adding a new room and making some alterations to the existing layout of their house. The estimated cost of the project is around $25,000.

With her limited knowledge of construction and legal aspects, Sarah wants to ensure they choose the right builder and are protected by a legally binding contract. She is in search of a suitable, straightforward residential building contract that caters specifically to small-scale, non-complex projects like hers.

Sarah comes across the NSW Residential Building Contract for Small Works over $20,000, which is designed for less complex, smaller alteration, and renovation projects valued under $7,500. This contract provides fixed price, easy-to-understand terms and conditions suitable for her needs.

Sarah finds the content helpful, as it guides her towards choosing the appropriate contractual agreement (Form 10A) for their upcoming renovation project. This way, she will be able to confidently move forward with her chosen builder and protect her family's investment in their residential property.

[Assistant's Response]
**Persona Scenario:**

**Name:** Mark Johnson  
**Age:** 28  
**Occupation:** Graphic Designer  
**Location:** Newcastle, NSW  

**Background:** Mark recently bought a modest apartment in a bustling part of Newcastle. Eager to personalize his new space, he plans to undertake a few small renovations, including updating the bathroom fixtures and repainting the living room. With a limited budget and a busy work schedule, Mark is looking for a straightforward way to manage these projects without getting overwhelmed by complex legalities or excessive costs.

**Scenario:** As Mark begins his renovation journey, he realizes that hiring a contractor is necessary for some of the work, particularly for the bathroom updates. However, he feels uncertain about how to formalize the agreement with the contractor to ensure that he is protected and that the project stays within budget. 

While researching his options online, Mark discovers the NSW Residential Building Contract for Small Works over $20,000. The contract's focus on smaller, low-risk projects resonates with him, especially since he appreciates the fixed pricing structure and the clear, plain-language conditions. This approach alleviates his concerns about hidden costs and complicated terms.

Feeling reassured by this information, Mark decides to utilize the Small Works Contract (Form 10A) for his renovations. This choice empowers him to confidently engage with contractors, ensuring that his home improvements are executed smoothly and to his satisfaction, all while keeping his financial plans on track.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: