You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]



Viewfield 7.x-2.x, xxxx-xx-xx
-----------------------------
#1230534 by keithm, sun: Changed allowed_views to be an instance setting.
#1230360 by keithm: Changed to remove custom token support.
#1230414 by sun: Fixed force_default to be independent of cardinality.
#1071212 by sun, keithm, imclean: Fixed viewfield rendering and theming support.
#1216684 by sun: Merged include files into .module.
#1230364 by sun, keithm: Fixed view select in field widget is removed when there
  is only one option.
#1230316 by sun: Fixed disabled views can be selected.
#1221440 by sun, keithm: Fixed bogus default value in field widget.
#1181226 by sun, keithm, ConradFlashback: Changed to remove
  viewfield_views_query_alter().
#1207552 by sun, keithm: Changed to use instance defaults with force_default.
#1209804 by sun, keithm: Changed force_default from widget to instance settings.
#311587 by sun, keithm: Fixed force default handling again.
#311587 by keithm: Fixed force default handling.
#1048516 by GoZ, keithm: Fixed select list to test for deleted view.
by sun: Fixed documentation, added test file.
#1140810 by sun, keithm: Fixed entity handling and changed stack structure.
#1140810 by keithm: Added support for all fieldable entities.
#704014 by keithm: Added support for Drupal 7.


Viewfield 6.x-2.x, xxxx-xx-xx
-----------------------------
#416922 by keithm: Fixed update_6001 to check current size < 128 before update.
#489908 by sun, keithm: Changed default value settings to field instance level.
  - $field['super_default'] is gone, which previously allowed saving nodes
    with no viewfield value, but then to use the field's configured default
    values automatically. This had an effect only for nodes that were created
    before the viewfield was created, because viewfields in nodes created after
    any field is created receive the configured default value preselected in the
    node edit form, and CCK/Field API always stores a value, even if it is the
    same as the default value.
  - $field['super_default_widget'] is equally gone, without replacement, as it
    merely completed aforementioned functionality.
  - $field['widget']['override_default'] is also gone, ditto.
  - $field['token_enabled'] is also gone, as we can replace both legacy tokens
    and Token module tokens without conflicts.
  - Global default values are migrated to the instance level.


Viewfield 6.x-1.x, xxxx-xx-xx
-----------------------------
#416922 by frjo, keithm: Fixed vname too short.
#1052370 by Anclywen: Fixed unrestricted list of allowed views.
#1120884 by keithm: Fixed viewfield creation notices.
#647746 by sun: Fixed %author id of node not always passed to view.
#571128 by sun: Fixed field setting labels and descriptions (UX).
#535494 by sun, chaps2: Fixed view is processed twice for tokens.
#831574 by sun: Fixed array_filter PHP warning.
#510356 by etzel, sun: Fixed exposed filters submitting to front page.
#477244 by muhleder, japanitrat, sun: Fixed empty view result output.


Viewfield 6.x-1.0, 2010-08-24
-----------------------------
by sun: Fixed character encoding and line endings of all files.
#509406 by sun, askibinski, KarenS: Fixed views field select options.
#118764 by alex_b: Fixed typo in translating arguments.
#100085 by Eaton: Implemented plugins as formatters.
#235572 by plach. Updated to Drupal 6.
by Zoltan Balogh: Added Hungarian translation.
#348257 by jerdavis: Added selection of available view displays to viewfield
  drop-down lists.
  Allows users to select a specific view display rather than forcing them to
  create a new default display for each view.
#367799 by webchick, jerdavis: Fixed metric boat-loads of notices.
  Cleaned up some code to remove some of the notices being thrown if
  error_reporting is E_ALL.
#301503 by plach, artis, radman16, jerdavis: Fixed SQL error on non-node views.
  Added $table_queue check on $query to make sure we've got a node table in the
  queue before altering the query.
#367799 by Darren Oh: Fixed more error notices.
#386430 by muhleder: Fixed default value not being used until node is saved.
#312131 by plach: Fixed argument caching.
#376433 by revimage, jerdavis: Fixed lost settings when node is modified from
  outside the node edit form.
  Removed fieldset from viewfield in viewfield_select_process() and
  viewfield_field().
#399872 by burlap, jerdavis: Fixed views access control.
  Added $view->access() check to view execution and rendering in
  _viewfield_get_view_content().
#416922 by Darren Oh: Fixed lost settings on default views.
by Darren Oh: Fixed error notice when force default is on.
by Darren Oh: Reverted previous commit.
  Arguments would not display on the field settings page when force default was
  on.
#386430 by Darren Oh: Reverted patch.
  Patch prevented nodes from overriding default values.
by Darren Oh: Organized code and fixed coding standards compliance.
by Darren Oh: Fixed more error notices.
by Darren Oh: Added translation template.
by Darren Oh: Fixed typo in changelog.
by Darren Oh: Moved theme functions file to theme directory.
by Darren Oh: Changed install file description.
by Darren Oh: Fixed update to enable fields.
by Zoltan Balogh: Updated Hungarian translation.
#373373 by ramsalt: Fixed page view changing node title.
#416922 by Darren Oh: Fixed upgrade for existing fields.
#434920 by Darren Oh: Fixed argument defaults being lost on save.
by Darren Oh: Fixed user keyword.
by Darren Oh: Fixed caching error.
#480432 by Aren Cambre, hadsie, scottrigby, jerdavis: Error when creating new
  viewfield.
  Added is_array() check to prevent errors when the field is first being
  created.
#480432 by Darren Oh: Improved original fix to prevent error on line 276.
by Darren Oh: Fixed undefined variable errors.
#568304 by Darren Oh: Fixed rendering of fieldgroups after fieldgroup containing
  viewfield.
  A viewfield in a fieldgroup would prevent subsequent fieldgroups from being
  rendered if the build mode was not full.
#568304 by Darren Oh: Fixed missing fieldgroups in full node view after last
  change.


Viewfield 5.x-1.x, 2007-02-05
-----------------------------
by mfredrickson: Fixed ID for author argument token.
  Was using node ID instead of user ID.
#100971 by eaton, webchick, alex_b, yched, and stefano73: Updated to Drupal 5.
  Some changes to the implementation:
  * More reliance on the views formatters (as seems to be the norm for CCK
    fields now) for formatting regular node views.
  * The full node formatter is now the "default". This may break some existing
    views. It's worth the pain.
  * Added paging as per stefano73/alex_b's work. Relatively untested, but it
    looks good so far. (Thanks!)


Viewfield 4.7.x-1.x, 2006-11-10
-------------------------------
by mfredrickson: Initial commit.
  Nodes hold content. Views save queries. Wouldn't be great if a node could hold
  a saved query? Now it can. Viewfield is a CCK field module that allows
  administrators to put views directly into nodes. When creating a node, users
  can select from a list of views. When the node is displayed, the view is run
  and the content is inserted into the body of the node.