System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Complete the below instruction by dividing the necessary task into step-by-step simple and primitive subtasks. For instance, these could be comprised of 1. pick up ... 2. go to ... 3. bring it to you ... etc. After completing the task, last step should be noted as 'done'.\n\nnInstruction: Restock chips in the drawer.

[Ground truth Answer]
1. find the bag of chips, 2. pick up the bag of chips, 3. go to the drawer, 4. put down the bag of chips, 5. open the drawer, 6. pick up the bag of chips, 7. put down the bag of chips, 8. close the drawer, 9. done

[Assistant's Response]
To effectively restock chips in the drawer, follow these step-by-step subtasks:

1. Locate the drawer where the chips are stored.
2. Open the drawer to assess the current stock of chips.
3. Determine if the chips are low or need restocking.
4. If restocking is necessary, go to the storage area where extra chips are kept.
5. Identify the type of chips that need to be restocked.
6. Pick up the required bags of chips from the storage area.
7. Carry the bags of chips back to the drawer.
8. Open the drawer again to add the new stock.
9. Place the new bags of chips into the drawer.
10. Close the drawer securely.
11. Clean up any empty bags or mess around the area if necessary.
12. Confirm that the drawer is stocked properly and everything is in order.
13. Done.

By following these steps, you can ensure that the chips are restocked efficiently and the drawer is organized.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: