You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


An in-wheel motor unit includes a reduction gear mechanism such as a planetary gear set in addition to the above-described electric motor, as described in, for example, a patent document 1. These are constituted as one unit. The in-wheel motor unit decreases a speed of the rotational power from the electric motor by the reduction gear mechanism, and transmits this reduced power to a wheel to drive the wheel.
Accordingly, the in-wheel motor unit needs to lubricate the above-described reduction gear mechanism.
However, when the above-described lubrication is depend on the oil raised up by rotation members within the in-wheel motor unit, oil stirring resistance increases consumed electric power of the in-wheel motor unit (the electric motor), this causes large deterioration of electricity cost (electricity economy) which is a highest priority issue for an electric vehicle.
Accordingly, in a conventional art, as described in the patent document 1, the oil in the lower portion within the in-wheel motor unit is sucked by using an oil pump whose the consumed electric power is much smaller than the consumed electric power by the oil stirring resistance. A predetermined lubrication is often performed by supplying this oil to lubrication necessary portions (portions in which the lubrication is needed).
In a lubrication control art described in the patent document 1 at this lubrication, when oil temperatures within the in-wheel motor units of a pair of left and right wheels are different from each other, the lubrication oil amount of the high temperature side in-wheel motor unit (the oil pumping amount by the oil pump) is increased than the lubrication oil amount of the low temperature side in-wheel motor unit (the oil pumping amount by the oil pump), so that the oil temperature difference between the left and right in-wheel motor units is eliminated.
In this lubrication control art of the in-wheel motor unit, the driving force difference between the left and right wheels due to the oil temperature difference between the left and right in-wheel motor units is relieved. Accordingly, it is possible to improve the running stability of the in-wheel motor drive electric vehicle.
However, in the art in which the lubrication oil amounts of the left and right in-wheel motor units (the oil pumping amounts by the oil pumps) are different from each other as described in the patent document 1, the oil levels in the lower portions within the left and right in-wheel motor units are different from each other, so that below-described problems are caused.
That is, the electric motor within the in-wheel motor unit has a diameter larger than a diameter of the reduction gear mechanism, as described in the patent document 1. When it is considered that a required mountability needs to be ensured by decreasing a radial size of the in-wheel motor unit as much as possible, it is not possible to set a large gap between the electric motor and the in-wheel motor unit case.
On the other hand, the oil pump needs to pump (suck and transfer) the oil in the lower portion within the in-wheel motor unit case even at vibration and inclination of the vehicle. The oil level in the lower portion within the in-wheel motor unit case needs to be considerably high so that the oil pump can suck the oil even at the vibration and the inclination.
For these reasons, it is unavoidable that the electric motor (rotational rotor) having the large diameter is dipped in the oil in the lower portion within the in-wheel motor unit.
By the way, in a case where (in a method that) the lubrication oil amounts of the left and right in-wheel motor units (the oil pumping amounts by the oil pumps) are different from each other as described in the patent document 1, the levels of the oil in the lower portions within the left and right in-wheel motor units are different from each other, so that below-described problems are caused.
That is, a case that the oil levels in the lower portions within the left and right in-wheel motor unit cases are different from each other means that the oil dipping amounts of the electric motors (the rotational rotors) which are positioned below the oil levels are different between the left and right in-wheel motor units.
In this way, when the oil dipping amounts of the electric motors (the rotational rotors) are different between the left and right in-wheel motor units, the oil stirring resistances by the electric motors (the rotational rotors) are different between the left and right in-wheel motor units, so that the driving force difference is generated between the left and right wheels. Accordingly, there is generated a problem that the running stability of the in-wheel motor drive vehicle is deteriorated.