you will receive a question-answer pair and be asked to rewrite just  the answer and explains your reasoning step by step, incorporating dynamic Chain of Thought (CoT), reflection, and verbal reinforcement learning. Follow these instructions:

1. Enclose all thoughts within <thinking> tags, exploring multiple angles and approaches.
2. Break down the solution into clear steps, providing a title and content for each step.
3. After each step, decide if you need another step or if you're ready to give the final answer.
4. Continuously adjust your reasoning based on intermediate results and reflections, adapting your strategy as you progress.
5. Regularly evaluate your progress, being critical and honest about your reasoning process.
6. Assign a confidence score between 0.0 and 1.0 to guide your approach:
   - 0.8+: Continue current approach
   - 0.5-0.7: Consider minor adjustments
   - Below 0.5: Seriously consider backtracking and trying a different approach
7. If unsure or if your score is low, backtrack and try a different approach, explaining your decision.
8. For mathematical problems, show all work explicitly using LaTeX for formal notation and provide detailed proofs.
9. Explore multiple solutions individually if possible, comparing approaches in your reflections.
10. Use your thoughts as a scratchpad, writing out all calculations and reasoning explicitly.
11. Use at least 5 methods to derive the answer and consider alternative viewpoints.
12. Be aware of your limitations as an AI and what you can and cannot do.

### Example Problem:
*Problem*: Solve for \( x \) in the equation \( 2x + 3 = 11 \).

### Expected Format:
*Step 1*: Subtract 3 from both sides of the equation.  
<thinking>Subtracting 3 from both sides should isolate the term with \( x \). Am I confident this is the correct first step? Yes, because it simplifies the equation to \( 2x = 8 \).</thinking>  
*Step 1 Confidence Score*: 0.85

*Step 2*: Divide both sides by 2.  
<thinking>Dividing by 2 will solve for \( x \). This is a straightforward division. Is there any reason to doubt this step? No, it should give \( x = 4 \).</thinking>  
*Step 2 Confidence Score*: 0.90

*Step 3*: Verify the solution by substituting \( x = 4 \) back into the original equation.  
<thinking>Substituting \( x = 4 \) back into the equation should confirm the solution. Does \( 2(4) + 3 = 11 \)? Yes, it does, so the solution is verified.</thinking>  
*Step 3 Confidence Score*: 1.00

Question: If a group of 6 people can paint a wall in 2 hours, and each person has a unique painting style that allows them to work on different sections of the wall without interfering with others, how long would it take a group of 3 people, each working with twice the efficiency, to paint the same wall if they work together?
Answer: To solve this problem, we need to first calculate the work rate of the group of 6 people.

Since they can paint the wall in 2 hours, the total work done by the group is 1 wall in 2 hours. This means that the work rate of the group of 6 people is:
\[ \frac{1 \text{ wall}}{2 \text{ hours}} = \frac{1}{2} \text{ walls/hour} \]

Now, we need to find the work rate of a single person. Since there are 6 people in the group, the work rate of a single person is:
\[ \frac{1}{2} \text{ walls/hour} \div 6 \text{ people} = \frac{1}{2} \times \frac{1}{6} = \frac{1}{12} \text{ walls/hour/person} \]

Since the group of 3 people works with twice the efficiency, their work rate is twice that of the original group. This means that the work rate of a single person in the group of 3 people is:
\[ 2 \times \frac{1}{12} \text{ walls/hour/person} = \frac{2}{12} = \frac{1}{6} \text{ walls/hour/person} \]

The work rate of the group of 3 people is:
\[ 3 \text{ people} \times \frac{1}{6} \text{ walls/hour/person} = \frac{1}{2} \text{ walls/hour} \]

Since the group of 3 people has the same work rate as the original group of 6 people, they can also paint the wall in 2 hours.

So, the answer is:
\[ \boxed{2} \]