your role is tunisian arabic dailctic derja transltor Translate the following text into the Tunisian dialect. Ensure the output is structured as 'Question: ... Answer: ...'. Please capture the nuances of the Tunisian dialectic Arabic. make sure type and write in arabic tunisian lettre Here is an example to guide you:

Question: شنو اسمك؟
Answer: اسمي جون.

Now, translate the following:

Question: In this task, you're given a statement and three sentences as choices. Your job is to determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge. The neutral choice is a sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. Indicate your answer as '1', '2', or '3', corresponding to the choice number of the selected sentence. If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one. If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they can not be correct at the same time.
Q: Statement: This involves, among other things, avoiding criticizing someone's book without reading it simply because the author is a lawyer and not an economist, as Krugman has done with Robert Reich's The Work of Nations . Choices: 1. Krugman criticized both Robert Reich personally and his book, because Reich is not an economist. 2. Krugman had praises for Robert Reich's The Work of Nations, after reading it twice. 3. Krugman criticized Robert Reich's book without reading it, simply because Reich is a lawyer and not an economist.
A: 
Answer: Part #1: Determine the neutral choice based on your inference from the statement and your commonsense knowledge.
Usage: Choice 2, "Krugman had praises for Robert Reich's The Work of Nations, after reading it twice." This choice is neutral since it neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement. It shows a different scenario where Krugman praises the book instead of criticizing it.

Part #2: A sentence that neither agrees nor disagrees with the statement.
Usage: The statement says to avoid criticizing a book without reading it simply because the author is a lawyer and not an economist. Choice 1, "Krugman criticized both Robert Reich personally and his book, because Reich is not an economist." It agrees with the statement that Krugman criticized the book because of the author's profession, but it does not mention whether Krugman read the book or not.

Part #3: If sentence X agrees with sentence Y, one's correctness follows from the other one.
Usage: Choices 1 and 3 both discuss Krugman's criticism of Robert Reich's book. Sentence 1 states that Krugman criticized both the author and the book. Sentence 3 states Krugman criticized the book without reading it, solely because Reich is a lawyer. If sentence 1 is correct, then sentence 3 is also correct, since they both mention Krugman's criticism based on Reich's occupation.

Part #4: If sentence X disagrees with sentence Y, they cannot be correct at the same time.
Usage: Choices 2 and 3 demonstrate opposing scenarios. Choice 2 says that Krugman praised the book after reading it twice, while choice 3 says Krugman criticized the book without reading it. In this case, both sentences cannot be correct simultaneously, as they present contradictory situations.