Hi! I have made a mock discussion board for you to reply to. You will be responding to this question Thinking about what you know of the therapeutic approaches of Freud, Rogers, and behavioral therapy, which do you think has had the most influence on psychological therapy in general and why?
Which approach is most scientific now; and do you think therapy needs to have a scientific basis?
The marking rubric for this assignment is as follows:
"Graded Discussion Rubric 2024
Graded Discussion Rubric 2024
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeContribution to dialogue
You should make multiple post that contribute to a dialogue. Posts should respond to posts already on the thread and connect, critique, extend or elaborate on the posts it follows. Posts should contain on-topic content – addressing the discussion questions and/or replying to another student to extend the discussion. Posts should reference or continue content already in a thread.
Posts should not be an “essay” that blocks other responses. Posts should not “broadcast” ideas while ignoring the flow of conversation in the thread.
Tone must be respectful.
40 to >31.98 Pts
HD
Multiple posts connect intelligently and respectfully with conversation and makes an original contribution that progresses the dialogue. Acknowledges/references persons and ideas in the discussion
31.98 to >27.98 Pts
D
Posts make relevant and meaningful contributions that clearly connect with the discussion. Shows some original content/thinking.
27.98 to >23.98 Pts
C
Posts make relevant contributions to discussion, clearly connecting with previous posts or ideas in the thread.
23.98 to >19.98 Pts
P
Post(s) is relevant/on topic.
19.98 to >0 Pts
N
No post or posts fail connect and contribute to the thread.
40 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeLinks to unit content, source citation
Your posts should make links to or cite specific ideas in assigned readings, lectures, and other lesson content relevant to the discussion. You do not need to agree with the course material but posts should integrate or critique lesson content. Marks may also be awarded if the post cites/links relevant sources outside the unit (e.g., news media, academic article) which contribute to the discussion.
20 to >15.99 Pts
HD
Excellent selection of relevant and appropriate concepts/sources to illustrate or support points. Concepts/sources are well understood and correctly applied. Sources/citations are clear.
15.99 to >13.99 Pts
D
Good selection of relevant sources, although there may be better selections for some areas. Post indicates concepts are generally correctly understood. Source/citation is clear.
13.99 to >11.99 Pts
C
Sources used are generally appropriate/relevant. One or two important concepts may have been overlooked or misinterpreted. Source/citations usually given.
11.99 to >9.99 Pts
P
Sources/concepts used are of marginal relevance. Over-reliance on one key source. Source misunderstood.
9.99 to >0 Pts
N
No post. Little or no reference to sources or concepts from the unit
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a learning outcomeCritical thinking
Your posts should collectively display integration, comparison, and/or analysis and critical thinking about the unit content; logically connect ideas across the discussion thread with lesson aims or broader unit themes; and provide critical evaluation of concepts raised in the discussion.
40 to >31.99 Pts
HD
Outstanding evaluation of source material/theory/data. Appropriate framework has been selected and thinking shows sensitivity to complexities of the issues. Strong synthesis/connections show deep understanding of concepts/argument.
31.99 to >27.99 Pts
D
Good evaluation of source material/theory/data. Consistent logical approach or use of appropriate framework. Synthesis/connections shows developed understanding of concepts/argument.
27.99 to >23.99 Pts
C
Sound evaluation of source material/theory/data. Logical arguments or appropriate frameworks applied. Synthesis/connections evidence a developing understanding of concepts/argument.
23.99 to >19.99 Pts
P
Some evaluation of source material/theory/data and connections with discussion. Generally coherent/logical argument. Synthesis/connections show some understanding of key concepts.
19.99 to >0 Pts
N
No post. Little or no critical thinking.
40 pts
Total points: 100"