System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
A helpful writing exercise is writing a story without using adjectives or adverbs. This will help you learn to use other words and phrases to describe what you are trying to say. Here are some examples:

[Ground truth Answer]
The trees were silhouetted against the sky. The wind was blowing. The leaves were rustling. The grass was waving. The flowers were nodding. The birds were singing. The bees were buzzing. The squirrels were running. The rabbits were hopping. The deer were grazing. The wolves were howling. The moon was rising. The stars were shining.

[Assistant's Response]
That sounds like a great exercise! Writing without adjectives and adverbs can really challenge you to think creatively about how to convey your ideas. Here are a few examples to illustrate this approach:

1. **Original:** The small cat jumped quickly onto the table.  
   **Revised:** The cat jumped onto the table.

2. **Original:** The loud music played at the crowded party.  
   **Revised:** The music played at the party.

3. **Original:** The beautiful flowers bloomed in the sunny garden.  
   **Revised:** The flowers bloomed in the garden.

4. **Original:** The young girl danced gracefully on the stage.  
   **Revised:** The girl danced on the stage.

5. **Original:** The fast car raced down the long road.  
   **Revised:** The car raced down the road.

These examples show how you can still convey a clear message while focusing on nouns and verbs. Would you like to give it a try and write a short story using this technique?

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: