1- Translate the following legal text into colloquial Farsi and make the Farsi translation regular and smooth. 2- Place the Farsi and English text with a line between each other, that is, the English text should be one line.  A space and then a Persian translation line and...
              4- Using legal language for Persian translation 5- Continue to the end of the text

                 .The Chapter I prohibition in respect of agreement, decisions and con- certed practices between or by undertakings or associations of undertakings which are implemented in the United Kingdom the purpose or effect of which is the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition in the United Kingdom.
A Chapter II prohibition is in respect of an abuse by an undertaking or undertakings of a dominant position in the United Kingdom.
Chapter III makes provision for the investigation and enforcement of Chapter I and II prohibitions by the Director General of Fair Trading, whilst Chapter IV contains provisions for a newly constituted Competition Commission to replace and assume the responsibility for work of the Monopolies and Restrictive Practices Commission. It will also act as an appeals tribunal for the enforcement of Chapter I and II prohibitions.
170Effects of illegality
An illegal contract is void, and consequently the court will not assist a party to such an agreement either directly or indirectly: ex turpi causa non oritur actio ('no action arises on a base cause'). Accordingly, no money or goods delivered under such a contract can be recovered by action.
Where money or goods have passed under an illegal contract the defend- ant is in a stronger position than the claimant who seeks the aid of the court to recover his or her property. Because the court usually refuses its aid once it discovers the illegality, the defendant to whom goods have been delivered or money has been paid may sometimes keep the goods or money. The maxim applied is in pari delicto potior est conditio defendentis ('where there is equal wrongdoing the position of the defendant is stronger').
There are certain exceptions to the above rule. Thus (i) where the parties are not in pari delicto (equal in wrongdoing), e.g. where one is subservient or has entered into the contract due to the oppression, duress or fraud of the other, the innocent party may recover money paid or property transferred; (ii) where the illegal purpose of the contract has not been carried out, one party may repent and recover back any money or property transferred. There must be true repentance, and the nonperformance must result from the repentance, not that the contract was frustrated for other cause.
170
Bigos v. Bousted (1951)
P wanted to send his wife to Italy for health reasons. P agreed with D that D should make available £150 in Italian money for the purpose, contrary to the Exchange Control Act, 1947. P deposited a share certificate with D as security, but D failed to make available the Italian currency. P claimed the return of the share certificate. Held: that the contract was illegal and the fact that the contract had not been carried out was not due to repentance of P.
Berg v. Sadler & Moore (1937)
B, a tobacconist, was placed on a stoplist by a tobacco association for breach of its rules. B concealed his identity, and to obtain supplies induced another mem- ber of the association to obtain tobacco for him from S & M. B paid £72 19s. for cigarettes to S&M. The latter became suspicious and refused to supply the goods or refund the money. Held: that B's claim failed as he had attempted to obtain cigarettes by false pretence (an illegal act).