I want to grade case study and would like you to grade it based on the rubric below. In the subsequent chats I would provide you with case study and you would grade it based on the rubric below.


Case Study Rubric
Case Study Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeClear explanation of key strategic issues
• The problems, scope, and seriousness was clearly identified in the discussions.
• There was a well-focused diagnosis of strategic issues and key problems that demonstrated a good grasp of the company’s present situation and strategic issues.
• Effective Executive Summary
• Did not waste space summarizing information already found in the case.
20 to >18.0 pts
At Standard
Exceeds Standard
18 to >12.0 pts
Approaching Standard
Shows adequate knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the present situation and strategic issues. Executive summary adequate
12 to >6.0 pts
Below Standard
Shows some understanding of the issues, key problems, and the present situation and strategic issues. Executive summary inadequate
6 to >0.0 pts
Poorly Completed
Shows little understanding of the issues, key problems, and the present situation and strategic issues. Executive summary missing or poorly constructed
0 pts
No Marks
Did not submit the assignment by the deadline.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeValid arguments; analysis of financial performance with relevant supportive detail
• Logically organized, key points, key arguments, and important criteria for evaluating business strategies were easily identified Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were identified and clearly analyzed and supported.
20 to >18.0 pts
At Standard
Shows superior knowledge of the issues, key problems, and the company’s present situation and strategic issues. Effective Executive Summary
18 to >12.0 pts
Approaching Standard
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were partially identified, analyzed, and supported.
12 to >6.0 pts
Below Standard
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were not clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
6 to >0.0 pts
Poorly Completed
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were poorly identified, analyzed, and supported.
0 pts
No Marks
Did not submit the assignment by the deadline.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAppropriate analysis, evaluation, synthesis for the specific industry identified .
• There was complete data on which to base a thorough analysis
• Key change drivers underlying the issues were identified.
• Synthesis, analysis, and evaluations were clearly presented and supported in a literate and effective manner.
20 to >18.0 pts
At Standard
Critical issues and key problems that supported the Case Analysis were clearly identified, analyzed, and supported.
18 to >12.0 pts
Approaching Standard
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were partially identified
12 to >6.0 pts
Below Standard
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were not identified.
6 to >0.0 pts
Poorly Completed
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues inadequate
0 pts
No Marks
Did not submit the assignment by the deadline.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusions and recommendations are congruent with strategic analysis
• Specific recommendations and/or plans of action provided.
• Specific data or facts were referred to when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions.
• Recommendations and conclusions were presented and supported in a literate and effective manner.
20 to >18.0 pts
At Standard
Analysis of key change drivers and the underlying the issues were clearly identified.
18 to >12.0 pts
Approaching Standard
Effective recommendations and/or plans of action were partially provided. Specific data or facts were occasionally referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions.
12 to >6.0 pts
Below Standard
Effective recommendations and/or plans of action inadequate. Specific data or facts were not referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions.
6 to >0.0 pts
Poorly Completed
Effective recommendations and/or plans of action not provided. Specific data or facts necessary to support the analysis and conclusions was not provided.
0 pts
No Marks
Did not submit the assignment by the deadline.
20 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProper organization, professional writing, and logical flow of analysis. APA formatting
• Logically organized, key points, key arguments, and important criteria for evaluating the business logic easily identified.
• Key points were supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case.
• Proper grammar, spelling, punctuation, 3rd person objective view, professional writing, and syntax.
20 to >18.0 pts
At Standard
Effective recommendations, solutions, and/or plans of action were provided. Specific data or facts were referred when necessary to support the analysis and conclusions.
18 to >12.0 pts
Approaching Standard
Key points were partially identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Adequate grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax.
12 to >6.0 pts
Below Standard
Key points were not identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs improvement
6 to >0.0 pts
Poorly Completed
Key points were poorly identified and supported with a well thought out rationale based on applying specific concepts or analytical frameworks to the data provided in the case. Grammar, spelling, punctuation, professional writing, and syntax needs significant improvement
0 pts
No Marks
Did not submit the assignment by the deadline.
20 pts
Total Points: 100