I need you to generate a Doctorate level response for me.

I have a Phd.. level project on International Business and Strategy and the brief goes thus:
The organisation of your choice is planning to expand its footprint in a new country (selected in CW1). Please prepare a report explaining “how” this internationalisation initiative can be implemented by analysing the layers of business environment, plausible strategic choice(s) and propose a suitable method for strategy implementation.
The chosen organisation should be the same as in CW1.
[This is a continuation of the internationalisation strategy analysis of your organisation of choice from CW1 where you answered the “why”, “what”, “where” and “how” questions for the past/existing internationalisation initiative followed by your proposal for a new internationalisation initiative. Now you are going to analyse the implementation of this strategy (the “how” question) in CW2]

Tasks:
Demonstration of analytical skills of working with data and problem-solving
Provide evidence of critical approach in your writing
Skilful and critical application of the theoretical models/concepts to address the assessment task
Use of a wide range of credible academic and professional sources to develop arguments
Demonstrate an evidence of wider reading and research
Use of relevant and up-to-date information on the chosen company

Format:
Maximum word limit of 3,500 words, excluding title page, executive summary, table of content, references and appendixes.
An executive summary of NOT MORE than 250 words
An up–to–date information on the chosen organisation
A clear identification of the main ideas and issues involved
The development of those ideas and associated arguments
Please use appropriate theory/theories and frameworks to support your argument (but remember, more is NOT always better!)
Clearly defined introduction and conclusion
Logically structured and concisely written text
Use of relevant and up-to-date information on the chosen company
Correctly and appropriately referenced
Evidence of wider reading
All the relevant figures and tables should be embedded in the running text in the appropriate position

Suggested Structure:
Title page – Module and CW2 title, tutor name, student ID number
Table of contents
Executive summary – max 250 words

Introduction and a brief background (approx. 250 words) – this follows up from the new internationalisation initiative you proposed in CW1. Why do you think internationalisation will be beneficial? Internationalisation motives

Situation analysis (approx. 1000 words) – critically evaluate the strategic position at macro, industry/sector and organisational level to support the rationale for choosing the target country/region. Macro environment (PESTLE), Industry/sector analysis (5F), Internal analysis (RBV/VRIO or VRIN), Summarising through SWOT.

Analysis of strategic choices (approx. 1200 words) – identify strategic choices for the foreign market entry. Please use organisation’s internationalisation strategy as the benchmark (refer to CW1), can they follow the same strategy? Was/is there any learning especially from a not so successful attempt? How do the competitors internationalise in the same market? Value proposition for this internationalisation initiative. What are you proposing to offer to the customers? Generic strategies OR strategy clock AND/OR interactive strategies, What could be the potential differentiation with the existing competitors? Can you analyse this with some examples? Depending on the organisation, one can study how this business strategy can contribute to corporate level strategy choice, Based on the above analysis what is the best international strategy to adopt (e.g. B-G matrix with support from Porter’s diamond and international value chain)?

Strategy implementation (approx. 1000 words) – how can the chosen strategy be implemented? Do you foresee any challenges? How do you propose to address these? Entry mode, why is this the preferred mode? What could be potential challenges? What could be potential risk mitigation strategies?

Conclusion (approx. 50 words)

The criteria for marking:
Your report will be marked based on the following criteria:
Analysis and critical evaluation
Application of appropriate theoretical framework(s)
Evidence of research and referencing (Harvard style)
Presentation

The following table shows the criteria and weighting used to award the final grade for your report.
Criteria
Introduction and context setting -5%
Application of theory and frameworks- 30%
Analysis and critical evaluation - 30%
Evidence of research and referencing- 15%
Overall structure and presentation - 15%
Conclusion and recommendations - 5%

Overall, the whole write-up must show very high standard work with most of the following features:  authoritative subject knowledge; a high level of critical analysis and evaluation; incisive original thinking;  commendable originality;  exceptionally well researched, with a very high level of technical competence;  high quality presentation;  impressive clarity of ideas;  excellent coherence and logic.  Work is close to the forefront of the subject and may be close to publishable or exhibitable quality.  Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at a very high level.  Referencing is consistently used, complete and accurate, plus demonstrates exceptional ability and insight, indicating the highest level of technical competence; work is virtually flawless and has potential to influence the forefront of the subject and may be of publishable/exhibitable quality.  Relevant generic skills are demonstrated at the highest possible standard. Exceptional achievement distinguishable even amongst the best quality work and deserving of the highest possible marks within the Distinction grade.
Use any and every international Business Theory, model and framework most applicable

Ensure to use only the most recent out of the most relevant references
The structure i want to use is below:
Title Page
- Module and CW2 title, tutor name, student ID number

Table of Contents

Executive Summary (max 250 words)

Introduction and Brief Background (approx. 250 words)
- Continuation of internationalization initiative proposed in CW1 (ExxonMobil expanding to Sudan)
- Explanation of the potential benefits of internationalization
- Motives for internationalization

Situation Analysis (approx. 1000 words)
- Macro environment (PESTLE analysis of Sudan)
- Industry/sector analysis (5 Forces analysis of Sudan’s oil and gas industry)
- Internal analysis (RBV/VRIO or VRIN analysis of ExxonMobil)
- SWOT analysis (summarizing strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats for ExxonMobil in Sudan)

Analysis of Strategic Choices (approx. 1200 words)
- Evaluation of ExxonMobil’s current internationalization strategy and the potential for following a similar approach in Sudan
- Analysis of competitor strategies in Sudan’s oil and gas market
- Value proposition for internationalization initiative in Sudan
- Analysis of generic strategies or strategy clock, potential differentiation from competitors
- Potential contribution to corporate-level strategy choices
- Proposal of the best international strategy to adopt in Sudan (e.g., B-G matrix, Porter’s diamond, international value chain analysis)

Strategy Implementation (approx. 1000 words)
- Explanation of how the chosen strategy can be implemented in Sudan
- Identification of potential challenges and proposed solutions
- Entry mode analysis and explanation for the preferred mode of entry
- Potential risks and mitigation strategies

Conclusion (approx. 50 words)

References

Overall, this structure aims to provide a thorough and well-detailed analysis of ExxonMobil’s proposed internationalization initiative into Sudan. By examining the macro, industry, and internal factors affecting the company, this report provides a comprehensive baseline to support decision-making on a strategic approach. By comparing ExxonMobil’s current internationalization strategies with those of competitors in the Sudanese market and analyzing potential opportunities for differentiation, this report will offer insights into the optimal strategy for ExxonMobil to successfully enter and compete in Sudan. Finally, the proposed structure will address potential challenges and provide suggestions on how best to implement the chosen strategy within Sudan’s unique cultural, economic, and political context.








"The most effective strategy for ExxonMobil's internationalization initiative in Sudan can be determined by combining the B-G matrix model (Stopford & Wells, 1972) with the Porter's diamond model (Porter, 1990) and the international value chain analysis (Gereffi, 1994). This strategy was created by Stopford and Wells. ExxonMobil's expansion into Sudan would involve elements of both global and multidomestic strategies, such as standardizing certain business functions (e.g., technology and systems) and adapting others to the local context (e.g., market dynamics and regulations) (Stopford & Wells, 1972). This is illustrated by the B-G matrix, which demonstrates that ExxonMobil's expansion into Sudan would incorporate both global and multidomestic strategies. Using examples of industry structure, demand and supply conditions, and government policies, Porter's diamond model can assist ExxonMobil in developing a comprehensive strategic analysis to guide its market entry into the Sudanese market (Porter, 1990). ExxonMobil can utilize this study as it prepares to penetrate the Sudanese market."

WIth the above in mind, regenerate the "How Chosen Strategy Can Be Implemented in Sudan" sub-section in 250 words