Given multiple reviews about 1949 ['movie'] ['The Heiress'], each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ["Intelligent sophisticated and touching Surely one of the best films of its time, stunning in its continuity and intelligence. This is not a tear-jerker, as I think it is too sophisticated for that, yet one can't help but feel the pain and disappointment in both her father and her lover. The point is that by keeping it so witty and sharp, it stands above the crowd of films that bring out the slobbering tissues; and that's admirable. So I can say that I admire the way this film was made, and how the cast kept true to this class; and that I think Ms. DeHaviland proved herself a great actress by this film, and deserved every accolade. Her reaction to her father's cruelty was poignant and reserved, yet full of inner power and emotion. It must have taken a lot of thought on what her reaction should have been, rather than how it could have been.Bravo! ", 'You have found a tongue at last, Catherine." HEIRESS is shy and homely girl, daughter of a prominent doctor, who is in love with a young and charming swindler. In the film some extreme, so emotions are quite predictable. The director tried to save the principal male actor and alleviate the negativity of his character. I think this made damage. Five-minute transformation of the main female character is also inconclusive. However, acting is quite good. The elegance and beauty of the images and set design are in imbalance with the mood of the film. It is certainly interesting. The story is clear, intimate, sharp and emotional. Unfortunately, it is predictable. Emphasis is placed on the personality of character. The essence of the conflict is between the timid daughter, keen father and perishable suitor. Of course, all from the perspective of conscience, self-awareness and emotions. The story could be more explosive and faster. It is too "wrapped" and the characters are somehow gentle. I think each character belongs to a certain extremes. Ralph Richardson as Dr. Austin Sloper is sleek and smart doctor. The father who wants to protect his daughter. The resistance that is provided to the daughter\'s romance is bland. At times he becomes a sadist and a psychopath. Basically it is a caring father. The effect is simply not complete. Olivia de Havilland as Catherine Sloper seems natural pond. The menu is one of my favorites. Too fast transformation I do not like. Of a shy and quiet girl becomes determined and strong woman. All this in five minutes of the film. Her character belongs to a certain extremes that is not expressed until the end. Oscar, I will not oppose. Montgomery Clift as Morris Townsend was saved. Miriam Hopkins as Lavinia Penniman is playful aunt who does not know what and where to. It\'s nice to see her again. The Heiress is a solid drama which lacks a bit of everything. '] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.