You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Newcastle shambles helps QPR finish with a win - report

Monday, 18th May 2015 00:18 by Clive Whittingham QPR have often finished seasons with a home match against Newcastle in recent times, and on Saturday at Loftus Road the Toon Army made perfect guests for the wake. Not only because they’re one of the few Premier League teams Rangers stand a chance of beating, nor that the shambolic state they arrived in and the despicable second half performance they produced reassured the Loftus Road faithful that there are others out there in varying degrees of mess, but because they actually add a silver lining to the cloud of dropping a division and leaving this stinking cesspool behind. Newcastle United, a famous old institution, a community asset, reduced to an advertising vehicle for cheap trainers and pay-day loans, will finish either fourth bottom or third bottom of the Premier League this season and for that they’ll be given the thick end of £70m. That’s £70m for a team that has lost nine of its last ten games, won only three of its last 21, won none of its first seven… thanks for your contribution, here’s £70m. Are we really that disappointed to be leaving this gross divison of excess behind? The whole thing felt rather like the Premier League’s dirty little secret. The club that has used the riches this league provides to line the pockets of mediocre, mercenary players and their agents while completely destroying what was left of its identity and standards of behaviour against the club that openly admits it will take the money, mark a profit on its balance sheet, aim to finish in the middle of the league, miss Europe and get knocked out of the cups at the first possible opportunity. Mike Ashley who treats running a football club like the rest of us do filling in our tax returns; Tony Fernandes the guy who saw a lot of Roadrunner cartoons and thought it made him an explosives expert. Little wonder they didn’t televise it, despite it being one of the few top flight games this weekend with anything riding on it. Initially it looked like even the glorified advertising hoarding would have too much for a QPR team that had failed to win at home in ten attempts, losing seven, prior to kick off. Despite having a tall, physically imposing back four of Nedum Onuoha, Stephen Caulker, Clint Hill and Richard Dunne in situ, Rangers were persistently troubled by long punts down the centre of the field. Goalkeeper Rob Green was forced to punch the ball out for a corner after four minutes when one such aerial assault had been allowed to bounce in the area. Midway through the half the centre backs got in a muddle again: Caulker pushed up to play offside, allowing a dangerous ball to bounce in behind him, while Richard Dunne went too deep and played the visiting lone striker Emmanuel Riviere on. The Frenchman fell over the ball, as you would expect of a £5m player who hadn’t scored in 18 league appearances prior to this, but QPR have always been charitable to these John Jensen/Lloyd Doyley types and the skewed shot drifted into the net regardless. Riviere’s perfectly executed summersault celebration was entirely out of keeping with the quality of the finish, the game as a whole to this point, and his appalling record since arriving from Monaco last summer. The 68 goals QPR have conceded this season is easily the top flight’s worth defensive record and it wasn’t hard to see how they got there on this evidence. Stephen Caulker was particularly dreadful, and may want to get his agent to leave the last six months off any potential sizzle reel their planning on sending around prospective buyers this summer. You could hear the circus music gently playing in the background as Sissoko rounded Onuoha and drew Green from his line with a low cut back from the byline. As the goalkeeper claimed the ball, Joey Barton rushed in and booted his team mate in the head. A bad cut, and mild concussion, saw Green leave the field for possibly the final time as a QPR player to be replaced by Alex McCarthy. He was immediately called into action, saving low down in the bottom corner as Fabricio Coloccini tried to steer a mishit Darryl Janmaat cross in from close range. Chris Ramsey had spoken before the game about not making wholesale changes to his team to “preserve the integrity of the Premier League”. Given that the week began with the QPR captain going on television and bemoaning bad eggs in the changing room, and finished with the same captain coating off one of Rangers’ greatest ever players on social media – with the inevitable jibe about how much money he takes home relative to the greats of the club’s past – with all manner of lurid allegations about players refusing to sit on the bench or come on as a substitute or turn up to training in adequate physical condition in the meantime, this seemed rather like Lisa Riley ordering a Diet Coke with her extra-large four cheese pizza. As a result, Ramsey’s team had all the same problems QPR have had for months – lack of attacking intent or ball-playing ability at full back, lack of anybody at all capable of playing left wing to any kind of standard, lack of creativity from midfield, shambolic defending at the heart of the back four, an isolated and frustrated striker and a chronic lack of pace across the entire team – but with the added annoyance that he’d picked half a dozen players who won’t be here next season ahead of half a dozen who will. The result was a predictably slow, drab, half-arsed 45 minutes of football and as half time approached the long-suffering supporters of this broken club were starting to turn. Boos were audible as passes went astray, and as the half time whistle sounded. At half time Ramsey removed Junior Hoilett and Stephen Caulker, two of many who’ve played brilliantly elsewhere and then nosedived in form since moving to QPR. Hoilett, in particular, looked like somebody trying to play football after taking a large dose of rohypnol immediately before kick off. On came Yun Suk-Young and youth-team graduate Reece Grego-Cox and the difference was apparent immediately. Grego-Cox is raw with the ball, but has a leap that belies his small stature, pace to burn and a brave, physical side to his game that nods to his background as a rugby fly half in Harlequins’ junior sides. Straight away he beat taller Newcastle players to three headers in succession, and within five minutes he’d provoked an angry reaction from Coluccini after a robust challenge. Now not only did QPR have some speed in their ranks, but they had something for the crowd to get behind. The mood changed, and within 15 minutes the score had been reversed. Grego-Cox’s first won header gave Austin a chance to cross for Matt Phillips to slide in at the back post but a last-ditch block sent the ball flying an inch wide of the bottom corner. The public address system played the goal music anyway. Pure QPR. No mistake seven minutes later though as Austin crossed to the back post during a flowing counter attack and Phillips headed powerfully down into the bottom corner to equalise. Austin caused more panic with muscular penalty box presence that ended with him firing the ball right through the goal mouth and out for a throw in and although Barton was booked for a stupid, needless foul on a Newcastle player shepherding the ball out for a goal kick the momentum and mood was very much with the home team by this point. When Tim Krul missed his kick and Matt Phillips showed more desire to reach the loose ball than Ryan Taylor, it set up Leroy Fer for a shot from 30 yards that flew into the net like an Exocet missile and almost ripped the net clean off the back of the posts. What followed was a thoroughly odd half an hour of football where QPR, repeatedly, invited Newcastle to equalise only to have their gifts thrown back in their face. Paul Dummett was left completely by himself on the edge of the six yard box, dead centre of goal, for a corner on the hour mark but when the ball fell to him he skied it into the upper tier of the School End. Eight minutes from time QPR toed a ball through for Sissoko to run clear on goal but he too missed the target – the flag had been raised, but referee Lee Probert recognised QPR had played the ball and the goal would have stood had it been scored. Nedum Onuoha pulled Remy Cabella back by the throat in the penalty area under a back-post cross – a challenge every bit as stupid as the one he conceded a penalty for at Liverpool recently – but Probert said no spot kick. In the dying seconds McCarthy spilled the ball in the six yard box but Hill executed a goal-saving block only to then, in the next attack, inexplicably let a long ball drop behind him into the area causing a total panic from which Newcastle again failed to score when they should have done. It was the sort of incident that made you wonder whether we should start using a ball with a bell in it. Not Clint Hill’s finest performance on potentially his last first team appearance at Loftus Road. John Carver’s side was a shambolic mess from the start of the second half – half time chat from the self-proclaimed best coach in the league working wonders there – with only Jack Colback offering any kind of effort, positional sense, discipline and performance. The rabble only became more disorganised as Carver started to introduce players from the bench. Rolando Aarons, Papiss Cisse and Sammy Ameobi all came on in the second half, and while the three they replaced could hardly said to have contributed much to proceedings –Cabella, in particular, won’t be troubling the kit man with a lot of washing this week – the performance of the three new comers was shambolic. What little shape Newcastle had about them before, dissolved entirely in the closing stages. I was particularly taken by the performances of Sissoko and Cisse – two giant, physical specimens who barely punch at flyweight for their team. Sissoko makes no secret of the fact he’d like to join Arsenal, and appears to be sulking until that happens. On the rare occasions he wasn’t walking around here, he could be seen standing still with his hands on his hips while the game went on around him. When situations were slightly tight, or the options for a pass were minimal, he just gave up and whacked the ball out of play. Cisse was introduced, ostensibly, to search for an equaliser but he was as much of a threat as a Green party parliamentary candidate and almost seemed to be deliberately missing his chances. One, when well positioned in the penalty area, almost cleared the School End altogether, which we haven’t seen done since the days of the old Wimbledon or when Simon Barker used to take QPR’s penalties. Then, in stoppage time, he took the responsibility for a free kick awarded by Probert right on the very edge of the penalty area but instead of whipping it round the wall and trying to beat the keeper for power and accuracy, or going over the four defenders and doing the keeper with elevation and placement, the Senegalese striker instead just chipped it delicately back to McCarthy. It took most of the three minutes of stoppage time for the ball to reach the goal. It was almost like he was sportingly returning it because he didn’t think it was a free kick. It was bizarre. Afterwards Carver said he couldn’t fault the effort of his players, and that it was a very hot day. Surely even Mike Ashley and his team of accountants must be slightly concerned about all of this. That’s assuming they were there to see it, and not at a buffet somewhere. If they do stay up, it’s thanks to the incompetence of others. Trips to Swindon and Rotherham remain a strong possibility. QPR, a team with nothing to play for, by contrast had a bit about them in the second half. Led by Matt Phillips and Charlie Austin, with Grego-Cox’s pace and pugnaciousness and Leroy Fer chiming in intelligently, it was a half-decent second half performance apparently inspired by a terse intervention from Les Ferdinand at half time. But you can’t fatten a pig on market day, and QPR were down long before the relegation was confirmed at Manchester City last week. All this talk of "owing the supporters a performance" rang a little hollow - how about one when it mattered? The fans streamed onto the pitch at the end and chanted Tony Fernandes’ name, like smokers eulogising over the smooth great taste of the thing that’s killing them. The half time words of Darren Peacock and Trevor Sinclair, said with genuine feeling and despair at the state of a club they took to their respective hearts in the 1990s, rang a lot truer. Another summer of upheaval and soul-searching lies ahead. Links >>> Knee Jerks >>> Photo Gallery >>> Ratings and Reports >>> Message Board Match Thread QPR: Green 6 (McCarthy 34, 6); Onuoha 5, Dunne 5, Caulker 4 (Yun 45, 6), Hill 5; Phillips 7, Henry 6, Barton 6, Hoilett 4 (Grego-Cox 45, 6); Fer 6, Austin 7 Subs not used: Wright-Phillips, Doughty, Furlong, Comley Goals: Phillips 54 (assisted Austin), Fer 61 (assisted Phillips) Bookings: Barton 49 (foul), Yun 83 (foul) Newcastle: Krul 4; Janmaat 6, Coloccini 5, Dummett 5, Guttierez 5; Taylor 5 (Aarons 84, 5), Colback 6; Sissoko 4, Perez 5, Cabella 4 (Ameobi 73, 5); Riviere 6 (Cisse 63, 4) Subs not used: Anita, Gouffran, Abeid, Woodman Goals: Riviere (assisted Krul) QPR Star Man – Matt Phillips 7 Probably the single biggest plus of the Chris Ramsey reign so far – from bit-part utility forward with no place in the team and no self-belief, to dangerous Premier League winger. Rangers will do well to keep him now. Referee – Lee Probert (Wiltshere) 6 Newcastle should have had a penalty in the second half, and there was a nutty moment in the second half when a QPR counter attack was halted because Newcastle were making two substitutions, even though the referee and linesman didn’t seem to have signalled for the substitutions to be made. That sort of chaos happens a lot when Probert is around, but he always looks like a man who’s enjoying himself regardless so that’s something. Attendance 17, 608 (1,800 Newcastle approx) The idea that starting a couple of the kids in this game could be dangerous, because it may result in a big defeat and a hostile crowd destroying them, was shown up for the rubbish it is by the second half here. For not only did the introduction of Grego-Cox bring much-needed pace to the team which helped it go onto win the game, but it also gave the fans something to get behind and support – there was an audible collective will for him to do well whereas a tired, staid first half with the same old one-paced team we’ve been suffering all season had the crowd right on the bring by half time, with boos clearly audible during the last five minutes of the half. The Twitter @loftforwords The Pictures – Action Images Photo: Action Images



Please report offensive, libellous or inappropriate posts by using the links provided.



Page:

1



YorkRanger added 07:16 - May 18

Excellent report. The lines on pigs and smokers in the final two paragraphs both top drawer. 0

simmo added 09:51 - May 18

You can't fatten a pig on market day, Clive. 1

timcocking added 09:54 - May 18

Surprised you made no mention of Lee Probert letting our man Clint batter the fcuk out of Perez (or some squealing foreign wimp) at least three times with no yellow card in site. Late, intentional, cynical and painful every time. Highlight of the game apart from our goals. We never get away with them usually.



In fact if we'd actually needed points, he no doubt would have sent him off. 0

Antti_Heinola added 10:03 - May 18

Clive, what was the story behind Les's team talk? I hadn't seen that. If true, I may have given Ramsey a bit too much credit for the 2nd half display.

Also, to be fair to Probert, he signalled immediately for the Newcastle subs to be made as soon as the ball went out of play for a goal kick - not sure why our players and a lot of fans missed that. But he definitely signalled. 0

Northernr added 10:26 - May 18

Antti - Sinclair tweeted afterwards that Les had "ruffled a few feathers at half time", that's all it was.



Tim - Very fair point. 0

Antti_Heinola added 11:13 - May 18

Interesting, cheers Clive. 0

Marshy added 11:43 - May 18

I almost had to pinch myself at the final whistle. Had we just won a game at Loftus Road. It was such a long time that I had forgotten what it felt like. But clearly this was no cause for real celebration, as Newcastle appear to be more of a shambles than we are. If we could hold onto to Austin, Phillips and Fer I think we could make a swift return to the Premier League. Sadly I can't see any chance of this happening. Therefore our best chance of being competive next season is to recruit some of the best players from the Championship and Division 1, and throw in some of our better youngsters. However, this assumes that there won't be any transfer embargo, and we actually have any money to spend.



0

Loft1979 added 12:18 - May 18

I love your writing. But this time I disagree with the 'tone' of the post.



1. There has been a 'Jekyll and Hyde' appearance to QPR this season. In 2012 we just stunk!! other than the SWP-scum game...it was bad. This year we beat WBA twice in dramatic brilliant displays. Sunderland twice looking class at that. Should have had AV twice but for Benteke. The scum game just weeks ago was a classic. On Sat, QPR's jekyll half showed up again. BUT thankfully the ugly serum wore off, and thanks to young Grego-Cox and moving Fer to the left (!!!) the beast came out.



2. Watched the highlights ten times. The Matty goal was awesome. He did to them what usually happens to us. Fer's goal...he has done that more than once. He almost unleashed vs Stoke when no one was looking. Since then he has had his share of scores and but for a post or two could have had more. I am not frustrated with Fer. I think Fer is part of our long term solution.



3. Manager: I AM frustrated with CR. He clearly is a good coach. But this time has chronic doubt syndrome and he has not been effective at erasing that. I for one feel that TF et al kept him because he would not overpay Pulis, Timmy or others while there was still so much money owed to bad contracts. HR left because TF would not add more funds....when clearly as with players...TF wanted existing contracts to just play out (as such HR could have stayed). IF CR stays he needs a good make over in the coaching staff. I would love Ainsworth as part of the back room.



0

HastingsRanger added 14:53 - May 18

The integrity of the Premier League was never at stake but the integrity of the players at our club was. Regardless of the performance of Newcastle, I actually felt the team did approach the game as much as you could hope from the team that was already relegated. Most players showed commitment and pressed as much as you could hope, considering what a one gear team we have. And having gone a goal down, I actually think they showed character to get back into the game. The introduction of Grego-Cox and Suk-young injected the much missed pace into the team and they played as a team, not individuals uncertain as to what the plan was.



This year was handicapped by lack of pace, assisted by serious flaws in player recruitment (e.g. regularly playing centre-backs out at right back, lacking balance and options) and poor management (e.g. not having a proper plan). Yet, there are a few worse teams than us in the world’s best league (in Sky’s opinion) and frustratingly we could have achieved safety and had a chance to regroup. Instead, this summer will see a move out and clear out like no other. Inevitable but ffs include SWP in that.

0

tsbains64 added 17:59 - May 18

You forgot that Lee Probert almost booked Barton twice but realized that it would have meant a sending off which would not have been justified -A sensible decision considering all the criticisms that refs get

At the end of the day we havenot been good enough but bet we will be back next season 0

dixiedean added 18:42 - May 18

I would have bet a lot of money on Barton getting 2 yellows after the needless first one. The combination of Barton's stupidity, Probert and it being one of Barton's old clubs made that a certainty , so I was amazed he escaped the 2nd one for a cynical foul. To be absolutely fair, if it was a game with nothing on it, then I think the ref can be sensible, but Newcastle could justifiably claim he should have walked. Not that it would have made much difference, they were so shit , gutless , clueless. That team were a disgrace and if they escape they can be lucky that Hull couldn't beat anyone when it mattered ( apart from us ). Which brings me back to Barton. Who the F*** does he think he is to say who is a bad egg ? Typical of his arrogance that he is actually the worst egg of the lot, yet he thinks he can makes judgments like that. Unbelievable. Please let's not have him back next season even if we pay him £70 a week instead of 70 grand. We've had 4 years of his nonsense with very little positive to show for it. A few captain's knocks since xmas but mediocrity most of the time and nothing which makes him worth all the baggage he brings. 4 years is a long time, so let him go hawk his wares in another shirt and take his Twitter account with him. Grade 1 knob in my book. Philosopher my arse as Jim Royle might say. Let's all cheer on Gareth, Hogan & Marcus Bean for Wycombe in the play-offs. Shame Chis Day didn't get there though. Top bloke. A proper bloke- like Gareth. We need a few more like them. 0

pedrosqpr added 06:13 - May 19

Didn't the match look like 2 midtable championship teams battling it out. Premier league your having a laugh.

If we can hang on to Fer and Phillips and get decent money for Austin we can have a decent season

0

TacticalR added 16:17 - May 22

Thanks for your report. That can't have been easy to write.



The first half was all huff and puff from us. Our 'bang it up to Bobby' football didn't work because we didn't have Zamora, and Austin doesn't have the touch to be a hold up man. Our whole defence looked paralysed for the first goal.



In the second half the substitutions of Yun and Greco-Cox got us going, and we had two moments of real class for the goals.



Phillips. Scored the first goal and his tenacity got the ball for Fer's strike.



Austin. Excellent cross for Phillips's goal.



Fer. Another wondergoal. Played too far forward in the first half, but came into own when playing behind the front players.



Barton. His forward passing was horrible.



Onuoha. Another meltdown moment in the box when Onuoha grabbed Cabella round the neck could have cost us another penalty (like the one at Liverpool).



Hill. Brilliant interception to prevent a goal in the second half, but in the first half one of the players who kept knocking it long. 0

Page:

1

You need to login in order to post your comments