You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an image outputting system which can be used for remote monitoring with an input image, and to a control program for outputting an image.
2. Description of the Related Art
Conventionally, there are techniques related to an image displaying system for outputting and displaying images shot by a camera on a displaying unit such as a monitor or the like, in a manner which meets the requests by a user such as a purpose of the image or the like. For example, Japanese Patent Application Publication No.52-013721 discloses a technique in which a television receiver including an magnetic recording/reproducing unit displays images of television and images reproduced by the electromagnetic recording/reproducing unit such as a video tape recorder or the like, by suitably switching between both images.
In many industries such as manufacturing, distributing, financing and the like, monitoring by a camera is widely used for employing security, or for enhancing efficiency of operations as one purpose of an image displaying system. Conventionally, many of the image displaying systems used for monitoring have employed a method of recording analog image signal from an installation point of a camera in a video recorder or the like. Recently, network environments that allow high speed and high volume transmissions have become widespread, permitting remote monitoring systems to remotely monitor obtained images. Generally in a remote monitoring, image data is transmitted to a monitoring center via an IP network, Internet or the like. The image data that is transmitted is digitized and compressed in a format of MPEG (moving picture expert group), motion-JPEG or the like, in accordance with the relationship between the amount of data to be transmitted and the transmission rate of the used network, and the like.
Recently, image displaying systems have become increasingly widely employed as a form of monitoring system. Accompanying this, also a request by a user for a monitoring system which can monitor images from cameras installed at points at one monitoring center or the like in order to concentratedly monitor many branches, for example, in the case of financial institutions or a chain of stores and the like, even when points to be monitored by installing cameras increase in number. And as the points to be monitored increase in number, the load for monitoring in the monitoring center increases.
As for an image displaying system for solving the above problem, Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2000-339923 discloses a system which detects an event requesting for the display of the image and which causes a monitor to display the image. According to a technique disclosed in the above Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2000-339923, images whose events have occurred i.e. the images requiring the monitoring among the image signals received from a plurality of cameras are displayed preemptively on the monitor. Thereby, in a monitoring center, a user does not have to search and find the image to be interested in among the plurality of the images.
Further, Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2001-34250 discloses a system which assigns importance to each of the images so that the images are displayed according to the importance. According to the technique disclosed in the above Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2001-34250, the importance is determined based on the events to be occurred to subjects of cameras or the like so that the image with a greater importance is emphasized or displayed in a prescribed position, thereby making it easier for the user to pay attention to that image.
Besides, there is an image displaying system for simultaneously displaying a plurality of images by sharing one screen of a monitor. For example, sixteen images are simultaneously displayed on one monitor by dividing a screen of the monitor into areas in the same size. Alternatively, the image to be displayed is switched to another in accordance with a prescribed time interval so that images of more points are displayed on one monitor. Also, there is a system which combines and uses the method of dividing a display and the method of switching images by a prescribed time interval.
In the above image displaying systems using the method of dividing a display or the method of switching images by the time interval, it is very difficult for a single user to understand the entire situation by viewing the simultaneously displayed plural images or the images which are automatically switched by a prescribed time interval when he or she is to refer to and monitor the images. Conventionally, in order to avoid omission of monitoring, a load on one person is reduced by increasing manpower or the like. However, a broader space for systems is required to provide monitors in the greater number. Further, in the system which switches the images by a prescribed time interval, when an event occurs, the image of the event may not be displayed on the monitor.
Further, in a system disclosed in the above Japanese Patent Application Publication No. 2000-339923 in which images are switched by an occurrence of an event, the images are switched too frequently in the case that events occur frequently. As a result, there is a problem in practical use that display time for each one of the images becomes too short so that an image is switched to another before the user actually views the image and confirms the event.