Given multiple reviews about 1965 ['movie'] ['A Patch of Blue'], each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['... I first saw this amazing B&W film, as a freshman at New Mexico Highlands Univ. in thee original Las Vegas! (\'65-\'66) Such great actors & that inspiring, sometimes haunting score by a young movie composer Jerry Goldsmith. Flash ahead to \'79, when I was West Coast Editor of Radio & TV for "Billboard Magazine" in L.A. & interviewed Mr. Goldsmith at his Beverly Hills home. He was working on thee 1st. "Alien" film & starting the 1st. "Startrek!" Imagine what-a-THRILL it was for THIS fan to FINALLY-meet-HIM! ... We briefly spoke about "A Patch of Blue" & his process in creating the music. I told him how I\'d always enjoyed film scores, starting with "The Wizard of Oz" (Harold Arlen was-a-Bflo., NY boy, where I-grew-up!) Working with Poitier was a thrill-for-him. If you\'ve NEVER seen this classic, you owe it to yourself, friends-&-extended family to share! I thank God for thee arts, especially music. writing & the movies. It has enriched-my-life beyond measure!', "Film history teaches us that before 1967 movies were tame and censored and then all hell broke loose post-censors. It also teaches us that Sidney Poitier movies were buttoned up affairs because he was standing up against so much intolerance it had to come incrementally. These were the two notions I carried into tonight's screening. This movie blows the lid off both of those expectations. It's a sentimental film yes, but it pulls real punches. The depiction of abuse of the disabled is as intense as anything I've seen regardless of its age, probably more so because of it. It's painful and raw; I was so tense throughout it. It makes the happy moments feeling so much more earned because of how cruel what we've seen before it is. And in many other places, the film goes into brave places surrounding unexpectedly mature topics. I was expecting something a little milquetoast but went because I wanted to see a Sidney performance. In the first few minutes I was actively hating it, only then to realize that discomfort was deliberate and deftly done. By the end I was engrossed and moved, quite a turn from the beginning. Certainly, elements are dated. But the raw emotion is as fresh as ever. Consider. My history expectations subverted and my heart full."] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.