Rewrite in discussive academic style and complete the last part more analytically and creatively
 “The problem with child narrators, however, becomes all the more pressing when the narrator is a girl child, as she has to navigate a complex and hostile terrain: she has to speak her truth and claim her authority as a child and as a woman in a culture that often ignores and marginalises both. She has to find her voice and identity in a narrative space that is influenced by the standards and desires of adult and male readers. She has to defy the labels and assumptions that are imposed on her gender and age and confront the powerful discourses that try to limit and shape her. Therefore, it’s not just a matter of making herself heard, but it’s also about wrestling with all those preconceptions and biases that come with her gender and age. Those societal narratives can be quite constrictive, right? They have the power to circumscribe and dictate who she should be. 
Naturally, this disparity prompts a profound reflection on a couple of significant questions that vie for our attention here: first, should the perceived diminished capacity, credibility, or value of the girl child narrator in relation to her male counterpart be accepted as an immutable truth, or does it represent an underestimation and devaluation rooted in prejudicial societal constructs? After all, boys typically have more leeway in a patriarchal framework. Can her narrative be recognized as equally capable of conveying not just a story, but perhaps a richer, more nuanced perspective derived from her unique experience of negotiating identity within a double bind of disparities? The assertions of Michel Foucault on the nature of discourse and power come to bear here, suggesting that what appears to be a pure narrative technique is underlaid by relations of power that not only privilege certain narratives but also serve to frame our very understanding of credibility and authenticity. Gendered narration, then, becomes a locus where power dynamics are enacted and potentially subverted, catalyzing an interrogation of the norms that govern whose stories are told, how they are received, and the extent to which they are valued. The girl child narrator, thus, stands emblematic of broader questions concerning voice and representation- a microcosm that invites a reconceptualization of narrative authority and an expansion of the narratives we deem as bearing the weight of truth. The challenging circumstances actually afford her a unique, if difficult, opportunity to carve out a brand of authenticity and authority that is entirely her own. Perhaps, instead of questioning her credibility, a reader should listen more closely to the stories she tells, because the narratives she offers could shed light on facets of life that are incessantly overlooked, undervalued, and understudied in male or adult world. Objectivity in storytelling, we must consider, is not an absolute state but rather a spectrum. Do we not, as readers, bring our subjectivity to the table, affecting how we perceive the ‘truth’ delivered to us? Therefore, the girl child narrator becomes an involuntary pioneer, navigating a terrain muddled by cultural underbrush that obscures the liberation of her narrative. Her voice- often dismissed- carries within it an intrinsic creative rebellion against the prevailing discourse that tends to silence or undermine it. There’s an inherent assertion that her story is worthy of the mantle of ‘narrative authority’, a space traditionally reserved for the male, the adult, the empowered, which ultimately brings us toward a second and most important question: does the narrator’s gender have any bearing on the text? Could the primacy of gender be such that it wields influence within the textual fabric itself? To what extent does the gender of the narrator infuse the narrative with layers of meaning, context, and interpretation that transcend the words on the page?...
Susan Lanser (1986), in her…..,   agrees that gender is a category “that is relevant to the analysis of the structural features of narratives.” In order to understand the true “nature, form, and functioning of narrative” (Lanser) it is imperative to explore the implications of “sex, gender and/or sexuality” (Lanser) of the narrator or narrative. Similarly Carson and others maintain that “While individuals may differ on the extent to which biological sex constructs identity, a broad consensus exists around the principle that gender inflects our material and conceptual realities in myriad tangible and intangible ways"