now link each pixel to each index. scale pixels from 0-7 in:


```
const scalarRhombus = [
    "       0       ",
    "      010      ",
    "     01210     ",
    "    0123210    ",
    "   012343210   ",
    "  01234543210  ",
    " 0123456543210 ",
    "012345676543210",
    " 0123456543210 ",
    "  01234543210  ",
    "   012343210   ",
    "    0123210    ",
    "     01210     ",
    "      010      ",
    "       0       ",
];
```

assuming 0 = some scale as 1
1 = scale 2
2 = scale 3
3 = scale 4
4 = scale 5
5 = scale 6
6 = scale 7
7 = scale 8


outshow in one not simple example htmlcssjs huge code without familyfonts and other unneed garbages. do not table it.<mark>stick pixels to pixel evenly centry</mark>
<mark>stick pixels to pixel evenly centry edge to edge precisely strictly.</mark>
<mark>they are not precisely sticked or stacked to each-another. develop a function or algorithm to consider a varieties in scales through scalarRhombus matrix and attach pixel to pixel edge to edge precisely independenly of varied scales in pixels.
okay. all indices should be centered in pixels to each-another and stack towards a central one exponentially edge to edge.</mark>also, randomly colorify each evenafter index. also, everything outwardly "0" in a grid = non any pixels.

for example:

45654 <-"5" should be stacked to botomish "6" from both in "5"
4567654
45654 <-"5" should be stacked to topish "6" from both in "5"

etc subsequenly

and why the fuk all particles scales messed and not precisely as in scalarmatrix of scalarrhombus?

maybe their scales getting outside of dimension and they shifting through indices?

because I see only all pixels scales messed but they are in rhombus shape.

maybe you are simply mirroring and duplicating pixels and thats why they seem messed, ne?

your stacking algorithm not precisely rightful. that stacking algorithm messing badly all pixels around 0-4 radius.

no. stackability should be to a nearby radius, not the fuk all around as they wanna.

your stackamandra algorithm does not affecting the other side which you seem mirroring through array wrongly.

then you simply rendering empty pixels which does not belong to scalarmatrix in scalarrhombus. because everything smaller than "0" in scalarrhombus should be considered as non-pixels.

you read all text from top-bottom. do as said. fix all indices to scalarmatrix.


which grid do we need in dimension to fit scalarRhombus?

outshow only dimension as 1x1,2x2,3x3, etc.
at least you can count to 11. then why the fuk all so badly wrongly misaligned. outshow a proper prompt schematics.

<!DOCTYPE html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
    <meta charset="UTF-8">
    <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1.0">
    <style>
        body {
            display: flex;
            justify-content: center;
            align-items: center;
            height: 100vh;
            background-color: #f0f0f0;
            overflow: hidden;
        }
        .pixel-container {
            position: relative;
            height: 150px; /* Change this based on desired overall height */
            width: 150px; /* Change this based on desired overall width */
            display: grid;
            grid-template-columns: repeat(15, 1fr);
            grid-template-rows: repeat(15, 1fr);
        }
        .pixel {
            display: flex;
            justify-content: center;
            align-items: center;
            border: 1px solid transparent;
            box-sizing: border-box;
        }
    </style>
</head>
<body>

<div class="pixel-container" id="pixelContainer"></div>

<script>
    const scalarRhombus = [
        "       0       ",
        "      010      ",
        "     01210     ",
        "    0123210    ",
        "   012343210   ",
        "  01234543210  ",
        " 0123456543210 ",
        "012345676543210",
        " 0123456543210 ",
        "  01234543210  ",
        "   012343210   ",
        "    0123210    ",
        "     01210     ",
        "      010      ",
        "       0       ",
    ];

    const pixelContainer = document.getElementById('pixelContainer');

    const scaleColors = [
        "#FF5733", "#33FF57", "#3357FF", "#F3FF33", 
        "#FF33A1", "#FF335F", "#33FFF5", "#FF8333"
    ];
    
    const scaleValueToSize = {
        '0': 1, // Scale for digit '0'
        '1': 2, // Scale for digit '1'
        '2': 3, // Scale for digit '2'
        '3': 4, // Scale for digit '3'
        '4': 5, // Scale for digit '4'
        '5': 6, // Scale for digit '5'
        '6': 7, // Scale for digit '6'
        '7': 8  // Scale for digit '7'
    };

    // Create the pixel grid based on the rhombus defined
    scalarRhombus.forEach((row, rowIndex) => {
        row.split('').forEach((digit, colIndex) => {
            const pixelDiv = document.createElement('div');
            const scale = scaleValueToSize[digit];
            if (scale) {
                pixelDiv.style.width = `${scale}px`;
                pixelDiv.style.height = `${scale}px`;
                pixelDiv.style.backgroundColor = scaleColors[Math.floor(Math.random() * scaleColors.length)];
                pixelDiv.classList.add('pixel');
                
                pixelDiv.innerText = digit;
                pixelContainer.appendChild(pixelDiv);
            } else {
                pixelDiv.classList.add('pixel');
                pixelContainer.appendChild(pixelDiv);
            }
        });
    });
</script>

</body>
</html>



and? and now all looks scaled but not stacked. now reread texts and consider them while designing a stackalamandra algorithm for pixels.


you need to utilise stackalamandra algorithm and compressefy and densefy all pixels towards most central "7" one.
they are not compressed. you need to utilise stackalamandra algorithm and compressefy and densefy all pixels towards most central "7" one.