System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Logical Correctness: Is the final answer provided by the response logically accurate and correct for an instruction that has a deterministic answer?
Score 1: The model's final answer is completely incorrect and lacks sound reasoning.
Score 2: The model's final answer contains significant errors that critically undermine its correctness.
Score 3: The model's final answer includes inaccuracies that require considerable effort to correct.
Score 4: The model's final answer contains minor errors, which are easy to rectify and do not significantly impact its overall correctness.
Score 5: The model's final answer is completely accurate and sound.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
<TABLE>\n\n| Place | Player | Country | Score | To par |\n| 1 | Retief Goosen | South Africa | 68-70-69=207 | –3 |\n| T2 | Olin Browne | United States | 67-71-72=210 | E |\n| T2 | Jason Gore | United States | 71-67-72=210 | E |\n| T4 | Michael Campbell | New Zealand | 71-69-71=211 | +1 |\n| T4 | Mark Hensby | Australia | 71-68-72=211 | +1 |\n| 6 | David Toms | United States | 70-72-70=212 | +2 |\n| T7 | K. J. Choi | South Korea | 69-70-74=213 | +3 |\n| T7 | Peter Hedblom | Sweden | 77-66-70=213 | +3 |\n| T7 | Lee Westwood | England | 68-72-73=213 | +3 |\n| T7 | Tiger Woods | United States | 70-71-72=213 | +3 |\n\n By referring to the given table, answer the below question.\nQuestion: who was the only player to score below par?

[Ground truth Answer]
Retief Goosen

[Assistant's Response]
The only player to score below par in the tournament was Retief Goosen from South Africa, finishing with a score of –3. His rounds of 68, 70, and 69 totaled 207, placing him in first position. All other players either finished at par or above.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: