System: I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
Bug report: Reviews that report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application or of a specific feature
Feature strength: Reviews that identify an aspect about an existing feature that users are satisfied with
Feature shortcoming: Reviews that identify an aspect about an existing feature that users are unsatisfied with
User request: Reviews that ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature
Praise: Reviews where users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment, unlike feature strength which emphasizes on the positive feedback about a specific feature
Complaint: Reviews where users express general dissatisfaction with the application. In contrast with feature shortcoming which focuses on the negative feedback about a specific existing feature, general complaint concentrates on general judgment
Usage scenario: Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
Noise: Reviews that do not belong to any other categories.
User: 'prompt:I will provide you with a textual user review of an Android app, aiming to categorize the reviews into specific intention classes:
Bug report: Reviews that report a problem, such as faulty behavior of the application or of a specific feature
Feature strength: Reviews that identify an aspect about an existing feature that users are satisfied with
Feature shortcoming: Reviews that identify an aspect about an existing feature that users are unsatisfied with
User request: Reviews that ask for a missing feature, functionality or content, as well as reviews that ask for the improvement of an existing feature
Praise: Reviews where users express general appreciation with the application. It focuses on general judgment, unlike feature strength which emphasizes on the positive feedback about a specific feature
Complaint: Reviews where users express general dissatisfaction with the application. In contrast with feature shortcoming which focuses on the negative feedback about a specific existing feature, general complaint concentrates on general judgment
Usage scenario: Reviews where users describe workarounds, use cases and scenarios involving the app
Noise: Reviews that do not belong to any other categories.
Does the author's intention in this app review relate to a Bug report or Feature strength or Feature shortcoming or User request or Praise or Complaint or Usage scenario or Noise?
review: Nice layout  --- but map locations are wrong! The overall layout is well organized, in some ways better than the website.Unfortunately, I found the hotel locations on the map can be VERY, VERY WRONG.Example:   I searched hotels in Sitges, Spain.  The hotels listed in the left column are shown on the map as A, B, etc.  However, at least three of the hotels were shown pointing to the wrong dots, including the two highest rated hotels, the Galeon and the Platjador.  The latter is shown at a location probably 150m or more from the beach promenade, whereas it actually is right on the promenade.  Also the location of the Parrotts Hotel was off by over 1/4th mile.   This completely misleads the reader, especially if location is a prime criterion.   The website maps appear to be correct.I could not find a way to report this flaw to TripAdvisor.  The app needs a feedback function so they can correct errors such as this. If the map locations were correct, I'd probably rate 5 stars.  As it is, it only deserves 2 stars.  BEWARE of this potential bug for any search on this version.Update:   The map problem is even worse than it thought. Searching hotels in Madrid, the location of Atlantico on Gran Via ended up on C. de Alcala about 1/2 mille away.  And the locations of the Atlantico on Gran Via was labeled as the Hotel Regina. It is possible that the incorrect locations arise when you zoom or move the map  --- but in any event it is a major bug!'
intention: '
Assistant: