{"input": "Where was the place of death of Amaury De Montfort (Died 1241)'s father?", "context": "Passage 1:\nAmaury I de Montfort\nAmaury I de Montfort (died c.\u20091053) was Lord of Montfort, son of Guillaume de Montfort of Hainaut, the first Lord of Montfort. The castle of Montfort l'Amaury, of which he started the construction, was completed by his son Simon I de Montfort, who succeeded him as Lord of Montfort. He married Bertrade.\nHe and his wife had three children:\n\nSimon I de Montfort (died 25 September 1087)\nMainier de Montfort, Seigneur d'\u00c9pernon (died before 1091)\nEva (died 23 Jan 1099), married William Crispin (died 8 January 1074), son of Gilbert I Crispin\nPassage 2:\nBeatrice, Countess of Montfort\nBeatrice de Montfort, Countess of Montfort-l'Amaury (December 1249 \u2013 9 March 1312) was a ruling sovereign countess of Montfort from 1249 until 1312. She was also countess of Dreux by marriage to Robert IV, Count of Dreux. She was the ancestor of the Dukes of Brittany from the House of Montfort-Dreux which derived its name from her title.\n\nLife\nBeatrice was born sometime between December 1248 and 1249, the only child of John I of Montfort, Count of Dreux and Jeanne, Dame de Chateaudun.\n\nReign\nIn 1249, Beatrice's father died in Cyprus, while participating in the Seventh Crusade. Thus, Beatrice succeeded her father as ruling countess of Montfort at the age of about one year old.\nIn 1251, Jeanne married her second husband, John II of Brienne, Grand Butler of France. Jeanne and John had a daughter, Blanche de Brienne, Baroness Tingry (1252\u20131302); Blanche married William II de Fiennes, Baron of Tingry. Jeanne died sometime after 1252, leaving Beatrice and her half-sister Blanche as her co-heiresses.\nBeatrice was married to Robert IV, Count of Dreux, Braine and Montfort-l'Amaury in 1260, when she was about eleven years old. He was the son of John I, Count of Dreux and Braine, and Marie de Bourbon. As was the custom for female rulers at this point in time, he became the co-ruler with Beatrice and Count of Montfort by right of his wife after their wedding.\n\nDeath\nBeatrice died on 9 March 1312 at the age of around sixty-three. She was buried in the Abbaye de Haute-Bruy\u00e8re.\n\nIssue\nBeatrice and Robert had:\n\nMarie of Dreux (1261/62\u20131276), in 1275 married Mathieu de Montmorency\nYolande de Dreux (1263\u20131323), Countess of Montfort, married, firstly, on 15 October 1285, King Alexander III of Scotland, and, secondly, in 1292, Arthur II, Duke of Brittany\nJohn II of Dreux (1265\u20131309)\nJoan of Dreux, Countess of Braine, married, firstly, Jean IV de Roucy, and, secondly, John of Bar\nBeatrice of Dreux, abbess of Port-Royal-des-Champs (1270\u20131328)\nRobert of Dreux, seigneur of Chateau-du-Loire.\n\nAncestry\nPassage 3:\nSimon de Montfort, 5th Earl of Leicester\nSimon de Montfort, 5th Earl of Leicester (c.\u20091175 \u2013 25 June 1218), known as Simon IV (or V) de Montfort and as Simon de Montfort the Elder, was a French nobleman and knight of the early 13th century. He is widely regarded as one of the great military commanders of the Middle Ages. He took part in the Fourth Crusade and was one of the prominent figures of the Albigensian Crusade. Montfort is mostly noted for his campaigns in the latter, notably for his triumph at Muret. He died at the Siege of Toulouse in 1218. He was lord of Montfort-l'Amaury from 1188 to his death and Earl of Leicester in England from 1204. He was also Viscount of Albi, B\u00e9ziers and Carcassonne from 1213, as well as Count of Toulouse from 1215.\n\nEarly life\nHe was the son of Simon de Montfort (d. 1188), lord of Montfort l'Amaury in France near Paris, and Amicia de Beaumont, daughter of Robert de Beaumont, 3rd Earl of Leicester. He succeeded his father as lord of Montfort in 1181; in 1190 he married Alix de Montmorency, the daughter of Bouchard III de Montmorency. She shared his religious zeal and would accompany him on his campaigns.In 1199, while taking part in a tournament at Ecry-sur-Aisne, he took the cross in the company of Count Thibaud de Champagne and went on the Fourth Crusade. The crusade soon fell under Venetian control, and was diverted to Zara on the Adriatic Sea. Pope Innocent III had specifically warned the Crusaders not to attack fellow Christians; Simon opposed the attack and urged a waiting Zara delegation not to surrender, claiming the Frankish troops would not support the Venetians in this. As a result, the delegation returned to Zara and the city resisted. Since most Frankish lords were in debt to the Venetians, they did support the attack and the city was sacked in 1202. Simon did not participate in this action and was one of its most outspoken critics. He and his associates, including Abbot Guy of Vaux-de-Cernay, left the crusade when the decision was taken to divert once more to Constantinople to place Alexius IV Angelus on the throne. Instead, Simon and his followers travelled to the court of King Emeric of Hungary and thence to Acre.His mother was the eldest daughter of Robert of Beaumont, 3rd Earl of Leicester. After the death of her brother Robert de Beaumont, 4th Earl of Leicester without children in 1204, she inherited half of his estates and a claim to the Earldom of Leicester. The division of the estates was effected early in 1207, by which the rights to the earldom were assigned to Amicia and Simon. However, King John of England took possession of the lands himself in February 1207, and confiscated its revenues. Later, in 1215, the lands were passed into the hands of Simon's cousin, Ranulph de Meschines, 4th Earl of Chester.\n\nLater life\nSimon remained on his estates in France before taking the cross once more, this time against Christian dissidence.  He participated in the initial campaign of the Albigensian Crusade in 1209, and after the fall of Carcassonne, was elected leader of the crusade and viscount of the confiscated territories of the Raymond-Roger Trencavel family.\nSimon was rewarded with the territory conquered from Raymond VI of Toulouse, which in theory made him the most important landowner in Occitania. He became feared for his ruthlessness. In 1210 he burned 140 Cathars in the village of Minerve who refused to recant \u2013 though he spared those who did. In another widely reported incident, prior to the sack of the village of Lastours, he brought prisoners from the nearby village of Bram and had their eyes gouged out and their ears, noses and lips cut off. One prisoner, left with a single good eye, led them into the village as a warning.\nSimon's part in the crusade had the full backing of his feudal superior, the King of France, Philip Augustus. However, historian Alistair Horne, in his book Seven Ages of Paris, states that Philip \"turned a blind eye to Simon de Montfort's crusade... of which he disapproved, but readily accepted the spoils to his exchequer\". Following the latter's success in winning Normandy from John Lackland of England, he was approached by Innocent III to lead the crusade but turned this down. He was heavily committed to defending his gains against John and against the emerging alliance among England, the Empire and Flanders.However, Philip claimed full rights over the lands of the house of St Gilles; some historians believe his dispatch of de Montfort and other northern barons to be, at the very least, an exploratory campaign to reassert the rights of the French Crown in Le Midi. Philip may well also have wanted to appease the papacy after the long dispute over his marriage, which had led to excommunication. He also sought to counter any adventure by King John of England, who had marriage and fealty ties also with the Toulouse comtal house. Meanwhile, others have assessed Philip's motives to include removing over-mighty subjects from the North, and distracting them in adventure elsewhere, so they could not threaten his increasingly successful restoration of the power of the French crown in the north.Simon is described as a man of unflinching religious orthodoxy, deeply committed to the Dominican order and the suppression of heresy. Dominic Guzman, later Saint Dominic, spent several years during the war in the Midi at Fanjeau, which was Simon's headquarters, especially in the winter months when the crusading forces were depleted. Simon had other key confederates in this enterprise, which many historians view as a conquest of southern lands by greedy men from the north. Many of them had been involved in the Fourth Crusade. One was Guy Vaux de Cernay, head of a Cistercian abbey not more than twenty miles from Simon's patrimony of Montfort Aumary, who accompanied the crusade in the Languedoc and became bishop of Carcassonne. Meanwhile, Peter de Vaux de Cernay, the nephew of Guy, wrote an account of the crusade. Historians generally consider this to be propaganda to justify the actions of the crusaders; Peter justified their cruelties as doing \"the work of God\" against morally depraved heretics. He portrayed outrages committed by the lords of the Midi as the opposite.Simon was an energetic campaigner, rapidly moving his forces to strike at those who had broken their faith with him \u2013 and there were many, as some local lords switched sides whenever the moment seemed propitious. The Midi was a warren of small fortified places, as well as home to some highly fortified cities, such as Toulouse, Carcassonne and Narbonne. Simon showed ruthlessness and daring as well as being particularly brutal with those who betrayed their pledges \u2013 as for example, Martin Algai, lord of Biron. In 1213 Simon defeated Peter II of Aragon at the Battle of Muret. This completed the defeat of the Albigensians, but Simon carried on the campaign as a war of conquest. He was appointed lord over all the newly acquired territory as Count of Toulouse and Duke of Narbonne (1215). He spent two years in warfare in many parts of Raymond's former territories; he besieged Beaucaire, which had been taken by Raymond VII of Toulouse, from 6 June 1216 to 24 August 1216.\n\nRaymond spent most of this period in the Crown of Aragon, but corresponded with sympathisers in Toulouse. There were rumours in September 1216 that he was on his way to Toulouse. Abandoning the siege of Beaucaire, Simon partially sacked Toulouse, perhaps intended as punishment of the citizens. Raymond returned in October 1217 to take possession of Toulouse. Simon hastened to besiege the city, meanwhile sending his wife, Alix de Montmorency, with bishop Foulques of Toulouse and others, to the French court to plead for support. After maintaining the siege for nine months, Simon was killed on 25 June 1218 while combating a sally by the besieged. His head was smashed by a stone from a mangonel, operated, according to one source, by the donas e tozas e mulhers (\"ladies and girls and women\") of Toulouse. He was buried in the Cathedral of Saint-Nazaire at Carcassonne. His body was later moved by one of his sons to be reinterred at Montfort l'Amaury. A tombstone in the south transept of the cathedral is inscribed \"of Simon de Montfort\".\n\nChildren\nSimon and Alix had:\n\nAmaury de Montfort married Beatrix of Viennois, died in 1241 returning from the Barons' Crusade\nSimon de Montfort, 6th Earl of Leicester married Eleanor of England, killed at the Battle of Evesham on 4 August 1265\nGuy de Montfort, Count of Bigorre married Petronille, Countess of Bigorre, on 6 November 1216 and died at the siege of Castelnaudary on 20 July 1220\nAmicie de Montfort, married Gaucher de Joigny, founded the convent at Montargis and died there in 1252\nPetronilla, became abbess of the Cistercian nunnery of St. Antoine's\n\nInheritance\nHis French estates passed to his eldest son, Amaury, while his second son, Simon, eventually gained possession of the earldom of Leicester and played a major role in the reign of Henry III of England. He led the barons' rebellion against Henry during the Second Barons' War, and subsequently became the de facto ruler of England. During his rule, de Montfort called the first directly elected parliament in medieval Europe, outside of Italian communes. For this reason, de Montfort is regarded today as one of the progenitors of modern parliamentary democracy.\n\nNote\nPassage 4:\nRudolf III von Montfort\nRudolf III von Montfort (born between 1260 and 1275; died 27 or 28 March 1334 in Arbon) was bishop of Chur (1322\u20131325) and Konstanz (1322\u20131334). He was born into the young family of Montfort-Feldkirch of the Swabian noble family of Montfort.\n\nLife\nFamily\nRudolf was the son of Rudolf II (\u2020 1302), Count of Montfort-Feldkirch, a collateral line of the County palatines of T\u00fcbingen. His mother was Agnes von Gr\u00fcningen, daughter of Count Hartmann II von Gr\u00fcningen. In 1303, he studied law in Bologna. After the early death of their brother Hugo IV (\u2020 1310), Rudolf and his younger brother Ulrich II \u2013 himself a cleric (\u2020 1350) \u2013 became regents for their underage nephews. Rudolf's sister Elisabeth was married to the Steward Eberhard von Waldburg.\n\nSpiritual and Political Works\nRudolf's clerical career was largely similar to his uncle Friedrich von Montfort's (\u2020 1290): He became canon in 1283 and provost in Chur in 1307. In 1310 he was appointed vicar general and deputy of the bishop of Chur. After the death of Chur's bishop Siegfried von Gelnhausen (\u2020 1321), Rudolf was appointed his successor and took office on 19 July 1322. However, Pope John XXII appointed him bishop of Konstanz shortly after, in October of the same year. He retained the position in Chur as administrator until he was replaced by the Konstanz Canon Johann Pfefferhard on 12 July 1325. Between 1330 and 1333 he was also administrator of the Abbey of Saint Gall, where some years prior, Rudolf's uncle Wilhelm von Montfort (\u2020 1301) had been presiding as prince-abbot between 1281 and 1301.\nAfter the split election of 1318, the Konstanz episcopate had been vacant for four years. As a result, when Rudolf took office, the financial situation of the bishopric was already badly damaged. Rudolf began to focus on the financial betterment of the bishopric and the ecclesiastical life in his diocese.\nIn the struggle for the throne between Louis the Bavarian and the Habsburg Frederick the Fair, Rudolf and his brother Ulrich sided \u2013 against tradition of the counts of Montfort \u2013 with Habsburg. Regarding the dispute between King Louis and the pope, Rudolf and his cathedral chapter sided with the pope. Rudolf was caught in the crossfire when the imperial city of Konstanz sided with King Louis and the king made peace with the Habsburgs. He eventually yielded to the pressure in 1332 and agreed to receive the jura regalia. In 1333, the pope placed an anathema on him and lifted him from his administrative position in the abbey of Saint Gall. Since he had been excommunicated, after his death, Rudolf was buried in unhallowed ground in Arbon in 1334. Bishop Heinrich III of Brandis had his remains moved to the Konstanz Minster when he started his tenure in 1357.\n\nReading list\nMontfort, Rudolf von (Feldkirch) in  German, French and Italian in the online Historical Dictionary of Switzerland. in: Historisches Lexikon der Schweiz.\nBrigitte Degler-Spengler (2005), \"Rudolf von Montfort\", Neue Deutsche Biographie (in German), vol. 22, Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 175\u2013176; (full text online) (NDB) 22, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin 2005, ISBN 3-428-11203-2, pp. 175\u2013176. (Digitalisat).\nAlexander Cartellieri (1907), \"Rudolf, Graf von Montfort\", Allgemeine Deutsche Biographie (ADB) (in German), vol. 53, Leipzig: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 582\u2013584 (ADB). Band 53, Duncker & Humblot, Leipzig 1907, S. 582\u2013584.\nBihrer, Andreas: Rudolf von Montfort. In: Biographisch-Bibliographisches Kirchenlexikon (BBKL) 23, Bautz, Nordhausen 2004, ISBN 3-88309-155-3, col. 1215\u20131221.\n\n\n== Notes and references ==\nPassage 5:\nGuillaume de Montfort of Hainaut\nGuillaume de Montfort, also known as Guillaume of Hainaut, was a French nobleman of the end of the 10th century, the first Lord of Montfort-l'Amaury.\nHe was succeeded as Lord of Montfort-l'Amaury by his son Amaury I de Montfort.\nGuillaume is possibly the son of Amaury, Count of Valenciennes.\n\nBibliography\nHadrot, Marie-Huguette (2002). Montfort l'Amaury: de l'an mil \u00e0 nos jours (in French). Paris: Somogy. p. 191. ISBN 2-85056-563-6.\nDion, Adolphe de (1895). Le comte palatin Hugues de Beauvais. Memoirs of the Archaeological Society of Rambouillet. Tours.\nPassage 6:\nJohn IV, Duke of Brittany\nJohn IV the Conqueror KG (in Breton Yann IV, in French Jean IV, and traditionally in English sources both John of Montfort and John V) (1339 \u2013 1 November 1399), was Duke of Brittany and Count of Montfort from 1345 until his death and 7th Earl of Richmond from 1372 until his death.\n\nOrdinal number\nHe was the son of John of Montfort and Joanna of Flanders. His father claimed the title Duke of Brittany, but was largely unable to enforce his claim for more than a brief period. Because his father's claim to the title was disputed, with only the English king recognising it, the subject of this article is often numbered in French sources as \"John IV\" and his father as simply \"John of Montfort\" (Jean de Montfort), while in English sources he is known as  \"John V\". However, the epithet of \"The Conqueror\" makes his identity unambiguous.\n\nConquest\nThe first part of his rule was tainted by the Breton War of Succession, fought by his father against his cousin Joanna of Penthi\u00e8vre and her husband Charles of Blois. With French military support Charles was able to control most of Brittany. After his father's death, John's mother Joanne attempted to continue the war in the name of her baby son. She became known as \"Jeanne la Flamme\" (Fiery Joanna) for her fiery personality. However, she was eventually forced to retreat with her son to England to ask for the aid of Edward III. She was later declared insane and imprisoned in Tickhill Castle in 1343. John and his sister Joan of Brittany were taken into the King's household afterwards.\nJohn returned to Brittany to enforce his claim, with English help. In 1364, John won a decisive victory against the House of Blois in the Battle of Auray, with the support of the English army led by John Chandos. His rival Charles was killed in the battle and Charles's widow Joanna was forced to sign the Treaty Gu\u00e9rande on 12 April 1365. In the terms of the treaty, Joanna gave up her rights to Brittany and recognized John as sole master of the duchy.\n\nPower struggles\nHaving achieved victory with English support (and having married into the English royal family), Duke John IV was constrained to confirm several English barons in positions of power within Brittany, especially as controllers of strategically important strongholds in the environs of the port of Brest, which gave the English military access to the peninsula, and which took revenue from Brittany to the English crown.  This English power-base in Brittany was resented by the Breton aristocrats and the French monarchy, as was John's use of English advisers. However, John IV declared himself a vassal to king Charles V of France, not to Edward III of England. Nevertheless, this gesture did not placate his critics, who saw the presence of rogue English troops and lords as destabilizing. Faced with the defiance of the Breton nobility, John IV was unable to muster military support against King Charles V, who took the opportunity to exert pressure over Brittany. Without local support, in 1373, he was once more forced into exile to England.\nHowever, King Charles V made the mistake of attempting to completely adjoin the duchy of Brittany to France. Bertrand de Guesclin was sent to make the duchy submit to the French king by force of arms in 1378. The Breton barons revolted against the takeover and invited Duke John IV back from exile in 1379.  He landed in Dinard and took control of the duchy once more with the support of local barons. An English army under Thomas of Woodstock, 1st Duke of Gloucester, landed at Calais and marched towards Nantes to take control of the city. However, John IV subsequently reconciled with the new French king, Charles VI of France, and paid off the English troops to avoid a confrontation. He ruled his duchy thereafter in peace with the French and English crowns for over a decade, maintaining contact with both, but minimizing open links to England. Between 1380 and 1385, John IV built the Ch\u00e2teau de l'Hermine (Castle of Hermine) in Vannes, which became a defensive fortress and dwelling for the Dukes of Brittany. He built it in order to benefit from the central position of the city of Vannes in his duchy. In 1397, Duke John IV finally managed to extricate Brest from English control by using diplomatic pressure and financial inducements.\n\nClisson affair\nIn 1392 an attempt was made to kill Olivier V de Clisson, the Constable of France, in Paris who was an old enemy of the duke's. The attacker, Pierre de Craon, fled to Brittany. John was assumed to be behind the plot, and Charles VI took the opportunity to attack Brittany once more. Accompanied by the Constable, he marched on Brittany, but before he reached the duchy the king was seized with madness. Relatives of Charles VI blamed Clisson, and instituted legal proceedings against him to undermine his political position. Stripped of his status as Constable, Clisson now took refuge in Brittany himself, and was reconciled with John (1397), becoming a close adviser to the duke.\n\nEnglish knighthood\nJohn IV was knighted by King Edward III between 1375 and 1376 as a member of the Order of the Garter. He is believed to be the only Duke of Brittany to have attained this English honour.\n\nFamily\nMarriages\nDuke John IV married three times: \n\n1) Mary of England (1344\u20131362), daughter of King Edward III and Philippa of Hainault.\n2) Lady Joan Holland (1350\u20131384), daughter of Thomas Holland, 1st Earl of Kent and Joan of Kent, in London, in May 1366.\n3) Joan of Navarre (1370\u20131437), daughter of King Charles II of Navarre and Joan of Valois, at Saill\u00e9-pr\u00e8s-Gu\u00e9rande, near Nantes, on 2 October 1386.Joan of Navarre was the mother of all of John's children. After his death, she served as Regent to their son, John V, Duke of Brittany, and eventually married King Henry IV of England.\n\nChildren\nJeanne of Brittany (Nantes, 12 August 1387 \u2013 7 December 1388).\nIsabelle of Brittany (October 1388 \u2013 December 1388).\nJohn V, Duke of Brittany (Ch\u00e2teau de l'Hermine, near Vannes, Morbihan, 24 December 1389 \u2013 manoir de La Touche, near Nantes on 29 August 1442).\nMarie of Brittany (Nantes, 18 February 1391 \u2013 18 December 1446), Lady of La Guerche, married at the Ch\u00e2teau de l'Hermine on 26 June 1398 John I of Alen\u00e7on.\nMarguerite of Brittany (1392 \u2013 13 April 1428), Lady of Guillac, married on 26 June 1407, Alain IX, Viscount of Rohan and Count of Porho\u00ebt (d. 1462)\nArthur III, Duke of Brittany (Ch\u00e2teau de Succinio, 24 August 1393 \u2013 Nantes, 26 December 1458).\nGilles of Brittany (1394 \u2013 Cosne-sur-Loire, 19 July 1412, Bourges), Lord of Chantoc\u00e9 and Ingrande.\nRichard of Brittany (1395 \u2013 Ch\u00e2teau de Clisson 2 June 1438), Count of Benon, \u00c9tampes, and Mantes, married at the Ch\u00e2teau de Blois, Loir-et-Cher on 29 August 1423 Margaret d'Orl\u00e9ans, Countess of Vertus, daughter of Louis of Valois, Duke of Orl\u00e9ans.\nBlanche of Brittany (1397 \u2013 bef. 1419), married at Nantes on 26 June 1407 John IV, Count of Armagnac.\n\nSee also\nDukes of Brittany family tree\nPassage 7:\nAmaury de Montfort (died 1241)\nAmaury de Montfort, Lord of Montfort-l'Amaury,  (1192 \u2013 1241) was the son of Simon de Montfort, 5th Earl of Leicester and Alix de Montmorency, and the older brother of Simon de Montfort, 6th Earl of Leicester. Amaury inherited his father's French properties while his brother Simon inherited the English title of Earl of Leicester.\n\nBiography\nThe Albigensian Crusade\nHis father departed on the Albigensian Crusade in 1209. It is unknown when Amaury joined him in the south, but he could possibly arrive in spring 1210, when his mother came there bringing reinforcements for his father. He was knighted on 24 June 1213 in Castelnaudary in the course of a particularly solemn ceremony and continued to fight under his father's command until his death at Toulouse on 25 June 1218. As his father's successor, he inherited the County of Toulouse (that his father had taken from Raymond VI of Toulouse as a reward for his role in the Crusade) and other titles and lands in Languedoc.\nIn 1224, he ceded his titles and lands in Languedoc to King Louis VIII. In exchange, Montfort-l'Amaury was elevated to a county, and several years later, in 1230, Amaury succeeded his uncle Mathieu II of Montmorency as  Constable of France.\n\nCounty of Leicester\nHis father inherited the county of Leicester from his mother, Amicie de Beaumont, daughter of Robert III de Beaumont. After his death, Amaury became count of Leicester, but, as a liegeman of the French king, he could not be a vassal of the King of England at the same time. By 1230, Amaury and Simon, his only surviving brother, decided to split their father's inheritance: Amaury would retain Montfort-l'Amaury in France, and Simon would receive Leicester in England. However, the affair lasted for almost a decade: only on 11 April 1239 Amaury officially renounced his rights in England, and King Henry III recognised Simon as earl of Leicester.\n\nThe Barons' Crusade\nIn 1239 he departed for the Holy Land on a Barons' Crusade with Theobald I of Navarre, Hugh IV, Duke of Burgundy and many other prominent nobles of the realm. The King Louis IX did not go on crusade, but gave the expedition a royal character by permitting Amaury to carry the Fleur-de-lys. On 13 November 1239, he was taken prisoner during a disastrous battle under Henry of Bar at Gaza, during which Henry was killed, and led to Egypt with six hundred other prisoners. He spent the next 18 months in the dungeons of Cairo where he was treated more severely than the other prisoners because he would not tell the sultan who were the other prisoners. He was freed on 23 April 1241, along with other French prisoners, after the crusaders under Richard of Cornwall and the sultan of Egypt have concluded an alliance against the sultan of Damascus. He died in Otranto later the same year on his way home and was buried, at the Pope's order, in St. Peter's Basilica; his heart, according to his own wish at his death, was brought to the Abbey of Haute-Bruy\u00e8re near Montfort-l'Amaury where Aubry Le Cornu, bishop of Chartres, enclosed it in an effigy.\n\nMarriage and issue\nAmaury was married to Beatrix, daughter of Guigues VI of Viennois, and was the father of:\n\nJean (John) I (d. 1249), married to Jeanne (Johanna), Lady of Ch\u00e2teaudun\nMarguerite (Margaret) (d. 1289 or 1290), married to John III, Count of Soissons\nLaure (Laura) (d. 1270), married to Fernando (Ferdinand) II, Count of Aumale (1239\u20131260)\nAdela (or Alix) (1230 \u2013 28 March 1279), married to Simon of Nesle (1220\u20131288)\nPernelle (d. 5 December 1275), abbess of Port-Royal-des-Champs\n\nGallery\nPassage 8:\nPhilip of Montfort, Lord of Tyre\nPhilip \u0399 of Montfort (died 17 March 1270, Tyre) was Lord of La Fert\u00e9-Alais and Castres-en-Albigeois 1228\u20131270, Lord of Tyre 1246\u20131270, and Lord of Toron aft. 1240\u20131270. He was the son of Guy of Montfort and Helvis of Ibelin (daughter of Balian of Ibelin).\n\nLife\nAt his father's death at the siege of Varilhes in the Albigensian Crusade in 1228, he succeeded to his French seigneuries. His first wife was Eleonore de Courtenay (d. bef. 1230), daughter of Peter II of Courtenay. Philip joined the party of his uncle, John of Ibelin, against the representatives of Frederick II. In 1244, he was created Constable of Jerusalem, but was subordinate to Walter IV of Brienne at the Battle of La Forbie. Philip was one of the few Christian knights to escape the disaster there. In 1246, Henry I of Cyprus, then Regent of Jerusalem, created him Lord of Tyre as a reward for his services to the baronial party. While the legality of this grant was somewhat dubious, it was recognized by Hugh I c. 1269; but Hugh reserved the right to buy back the fief.\nPhilip was married a second time, after 1240, to Maria of Antioch-Armenia, the elder daughter of Raymond-Roupen of Antioch and hence Lady of Toron and pretender of Armenia.\nHe joined the Seventh Crusade, and was employed as the ambassador of Louis IX of France in negotiations for a truce and retreat from Damietta. In 1256, he expelled the Venetians from Tyre, an action which helped to precipitate the War of St. Sabas. During that conflict, he attempted to relieve the Genoese in Acre in 1258, but was repulsed, which helped decide the struggle for the Venetians. In 1266, he lost Toron to the Sultan Baibars; but even in Philip's old age, Baibars feared both his energetic leadership and the possible success of his appeals to Europe for aid. In 1270, Philip was killed by an Assassin possibly in the employ of Baibars.He was succeeded by his son Philip II in his French possessions, and by his son John of Montfort in Outremer.\n\nChildren\nFrom his first marriage to Eleonore de Courtenay:\n\nPhilip \u0399\u0399 of Montfort, Lord of Castres-en-Albigeois (d. September 24, 1270, Tunis), married Jeanne de Levis-MirepoixFrom his second marriage to Maria of Antioch-Armenia:\nJohn of Montfort, Lord of Toron and Tyre (c. 1240 \u2013 November 27, 1283, Tyre), married September 22, 1268 Margaret of Antioch-Lusignan\nPhilippa de Montfort (d. 1282), married William, Lord of Esneval in Normandy\nHumphrey of Montfort, Lord of Toron and Tyre (d. February 12, 1284, Tyre), married c. 1270s Eschiva of Ibelin, Lady of Beirut\nPassage 9:\nAmaury II de Montfort\nAmaury II (d. 1089) was the fourth lord of Montfort l'Amaury, a castle in the territory that eventually became modern-day France.\nHe was the son of Simon I, Lord of Montfort, and Isabel de Broyes.\nHe succeeded his father and died soon after. He, in turn, was succeeded by his half brother Richard de Montfort.\n\nBibliography\nHadrot, Marie-Huguette (2002). Montfort l'Amaury: de l'an mil \u00e0 nos jours. Paris, France: SOMOGY (ADL). ISBN 2-85056-563-6.\nPassage 10:\nJohn IV, Count of Soissons\nJohn IV (died before May 1302), son of John III, Count of Soissons, and Marguerite of Montfort, daughter of Amaury VI, Count of Montfort. Count of Soissons, inherited upon his father\u2019s death in 1286.\nJohn married Marguerite of Rumigny, daughter of Hugh II of Rumigny and his wife Philippa.  John and Marguerite had two children:\n\nJohn V, Count of Soissons\nHugh Count of Soissons.Upon John\u2019s death in 1302, his son and namesake became count.\n\nSources\nDormay, C., Histoire de la ville de Soissons et de ses rois, ducs, comtes et gouverneurs, Soissons, 1664 (available on Google Books)", "answers": ["Toulouse"], "length": 5159, "dataset": "2wikimqa_e", "language": "en", "all_classes": null, "_id": "79e5312122eb8a7811f0ac120e76d2ff7576287cab7c6a63"}/n
“input”: This is the question to be answered.
“context”: This is the information needed to answer the question.
“answer”: This is the correct answer(ground truth) to the question.

Task Instructions:
(1) Generate a full and concise reasoning path from the "input" question to the ground truth "answer", using sentences from the "context" to support each step.
(2) For each step in the reasoning path, include one unaltered sentence from the “context” to demonstrate how the information leads to the answer.
(3) Structure the response as a JSON object. Each reasoning step should correspond to one original sentence from the “context”.

Use JSON format with 'step' and 'sentence' for your output.
{
  "reasoning": [
    {
      "step": 1,
      "sentence": "<insert first sentence used from context>"
    },
    {
      "step": 2,
      "sentence": "<insert second sentence used from context>"
    },
    ...
  ]
}
Ensure each “sentence” is copied exactly as in the context without any modifications.