Given multiple reviews about 1970 movie Beneath the Planet of the Apes, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ['This is your only spoiler warning. I\'ve been having a lot of fun lately going through the 20th Century Fox vault of so-called "science fiction". Having blazed through the Star Wars and Alien movies, I\'m now on the Planet of the Apes series. In all honesty, only the first two films in this franchise need to be seen because they create (and subsequently) destroy the world we know as The Planet of the Apes. The third through fifth sequels are in the league of Star Wars: Episode I. \'Planet\' was an interesting composite of then-current 1968 society, Roman society, and Mad Magazine. Everything you know is flipped, but you still know what it\'s about. Unlike other "science fiction" endeavors, \'Planet\' didn\'t use the continuous Black stereotype frequent in the Alien movies, The Thing, and Poltergeist. Dodge was perhaps the only realistic character in the movie. Then there is the sequels. An embarrassment by modern standards, made worse by how much Tim Burton blatantly copied them for his spoof. \'Beneath\' is 1/2 of a movie because it spends half its time remaking the original before breaking new ground. Aliens was an unconscious remake, this is deliberate. It is less experimental than the first, more formulaic. The lack of experimenting, by comparison, killed the other franchises by their fourth installments. Funny, Heston drops the bomb that destroys the world and, thus, the series. Fox\'s budget cuts hurt the visual aspect of this film in ways that science fiction never experienced before. Too often it just looks like Roger Corman made it. \'Planet\' was a super-size Twilight Zone episode, \'Beneath\' is melancholy Star Trek. Fortunately, the subtexts are stronger this time because they aren\'t as bombastic in trying to make their points. The triangle bond between the ape society (gorilla-orangutan-chimp) is embellished. Militarism becomes the dominant theme and the mutants are straight out of \'Dr. Strangelove.\' Humanity will continue to destroy itself, even after nuking the world into oblivion. Also, as shown in Terminator, mankind will continue to live in the ruins of his old world. Overall, yet another example of an ambitious (and powerful) film vision wrecked by poor execution. 2 out of 5.']

        Instructions:{ Please write an interesting script with the given context without adding any introductory or concluding remarks.
        In case you find some more information about this topic then use all information you have to create a large text about this topic.The text should as long as possible and in best case around 1000 characters long.
        Ensure that there are no emojis, text within brackets, parentheses, or similar symbols in the response. 
        Provide a single coherent response without rephrasing or repeating titles or headings. Avoid enumerations or bullet points. 
        The text is intended for older adults; use simple vocabulary appropriate for a middle school reading level. Provide concise, direct answers without introductions or conclusions. 
        Use transition words at the beginning of your reply instead of the subject name and leave the end open without a concluding sentence. 
        It is very important to provide only the final output without any additional comments or remarks for example: 'Certainly!' Here's the revised text.
         
        Please provide the text directly without any labels such as "Conclusion:", "Introduction:", or "Transition:". Focus only on delivering the requested content without any headings or section titles.
        Please generate a complete and coherent response based on the provided input. Ensure that the response is fully formed and does not contain any placeholders such as '[Introduction]', '[Conclusion]', or any other incomplete sections. 
        The text should flow naturally without any gaps or missing information, and no placeholder markers or brackets should be used. 
        Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words "Reply finished" to indicate that your response is complete. 
        Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.}