Rewrite the entire text below, make it sound more coherent and better. Mention everything in great detail add some additional good arguments:

''1. The Hadith you mentioned also states that wealth will become abundant and overflowing and it is not limited to he Arabian Peninsula, so it implies that worldwide everyone will be wealthy. This couldn’t be further from the truth, as 10% of the world population lives in extreme poverty and in Muslim countries like Afghanistan and Yemen it is even 80%. That alone makes this prophecy a failed prophecy.

And the Arabian Peninsula is still largely a desert and arid land. Some areas have become more green and vegetation cover has increased in recent years. This is mainly due to human factors, such as improvements in water management, and the planting of trees and other vegetation. Obviously if you have better watering mechanisms and plant lots of plants, your land will become more green. This has nothing to do with a divine prophecy. And even back then there were many vegetation in the Arabian Peninsula, such as the Riad. So it is not so impressive if Mohammad saw some parts of the Peninsula being green and concluding it may stretch out to the rest of it.

2. The Quran claims that Allah closes the chest of disbelieves like when someone climbs in the sky. However when something climbs to a high altitude the air becomes thinner as there are less air particles and oxygen and it becomes harder to breath, your chest does not actually become thinner. It actually expands because your body wants to take in more oxygen. So the Quran Verse is actually a scientific mistake.

3. Oh wow the Quran says Clouds are heavy, what a miracle. Could it be that water drops down from the clouds when it rains? And water contains weight? Do you think people back then never carried Containers full of water and noticed it becomes heavy?

4. The healthy benefits of fasting are known since ancient times. Ancient Greeks and Indians knew about fasting and how it can improve your health. Even Hippocrates 1000 years before Islam said eating while sick feeds the disease. This is neither new nor groundbreaking.

5. The supposed barrier mentioned in the Quran can actually be attributed to the pycnocline zone – a natural occurrence in which water density changes rapidly due to variations in salt concentration and temperature. The Quran’s claim of a barrier preventing the mixing of fresh and salt water is inconsistent with this scientifically-recognized phenomenon. Therefore, the Quran is completely wrong because pycnocline zone is not a barrier which prevents salt and sea water from mixing.

6. Pork can potentially carry the parasite that causes trichinosis, but this is a rare occurrence in developed countries where pork is raised and handled in sanitary conditions. Cooking pork thoroughly to an internal temperature of 145°F (63°C) can kill any potential bacteria or parasites.

There is some evidence to suggest that consuming pork liver can increase the risk of Hepatitis E, but this is a relatively rare disease in most parts of the world. Hepatitis E can also be contracted from other sources, such as contaminated water or shellfish.

The claim that pork is the cause of Multiple Sclerosis, Liver cancer, Cirrhosis, and Yersinia is not supported by scientific evidence. Multiple Sclerosis is a complex autoimmune disease with no known cause, while liver cancer and cirrhosis are most commonly caused by alcohol abuse and chronic hepatitis B or C infections. Yersinia is a bacterial infection that can be contracted from a variety of sources, not just pork.

Ever heard of Mett? It is raw pork and very often eaten in germany and does not cause any harm because the meat is inspected and high quality. So you are completely wrong about pork, it is not more dangerous than any other meat as long the meat is fresh and inspected.

7. You are wrong. Moderate alcohol consumption has been shown to have some health benefits, such as a lower risk of cardiovascular disease in some populations. Only excessive alcohol consumption can have serious negative health consequences, such as liver disease, neurological damage, and an increased risk of certain cancers.

The link between alcohol consumption and cancer risk depends on the type and amount of alcohol consumed, as well as individual factors such as age, sex, and genetic predisposition. Alcohol in small amounts does not cause cancer for most healthy humans.

It is not accurate to claim that Muslim-majority countries have some of the lowest cancer rates in the world due to their prohibition of alcohol. There are many factors that contribute to cancer rates, including environmental factors, lifestyle habits, and access to healthcare. While some studies have suggested a link between alcohol consumption and cancer rates, it is not the only or even the primary factor that influences cancer risk.

8. The practice of isolating individuals who were suspected of being infected with a contagious disease has been documented as far back as the Old Testament of the Bible. In the book of Leviticus, there are references to people being isolated for periods of time if they had a skin disease that was suspected to be contagious.

In ancient Greece, the concept of quarantine was also practiced. The Greek physician Hippocrates wrote about the need to isolate people with contagious diseases in order to prevent their spread. During the Plague of Athens in 430 BC, the Greeks used quarantine to isolate people who were sick with the disease.

So Mohammad suggesting sick people should isolate themselves to prevent diseases from spreading is not new for its time.

9. The claim that the use of past tense to describe future events in the Qur’an is evidence of its divine origin is unfounded and lacks critical analysis. The argument is based on a misunderstanding of the unique grammatical features of the Arabic language, specifically the preterite tense, which is commonly used to refer to future events. Therefore, the use of past tense in the Qur’an does not provide any compelling evidence for its divine authorship.

Furthermore, the assertion that a human author would not use past tense to describe future events is unsubstantiated and ignores the fact that the preterite tense is used in classical Arabic literature by humans. The claim that the use of past tense reflects the author’s belief that future events have already happened is an unsupported assumption that cannot be verified.

Additionally, the argument assumes that the translations of the Qur’an accurately reflect the nuances of the original Arabic language, which is not always the case. Therefore, any conclusions drawn from the translations should be approached with caution and cannot be used as evidence for the divine origin of the Qur’an.

10. Mohammad’s baby son Ibrahim died before Fatima. So again a wrong prophecy. Even if this was true, so what? People guess correctly all the time, this is nothing of divinity,

11. The claim that the Qur’an’s omission of the fact that the Earth revolves around the sun is evidence of its divine origin is a flawed argument. Firstly, the lack of direct mention of a scientific fact does not prove that the author of the Qur’an had divine knowledge. It is entirely possible that the author simply did not know this fact or did not consider it important enough to include.

Secondly, the argument implies that if Muhammad had directly revealed that the Earth revolves around the sun, he would have been discredited. This assumption is unfounded, as there were other scientific discoveries that were accepted and celebrated during the time of Muhammad. Furthermore, Muhammad was known for his wisdom and knowledge, so it is unlikely that such a revelation would have led to his discredit.

Moreover, the claim that the Qur’an describes everything from the point of view of an observer and cleverly refers to the orbits of celestial bodies is not unique to the Qur’an. Similar descriptions can be found in other ancient texts from different cultures. Additionally, the interpretation of the Qur’anic verse in question as referring to the individual orbits of celestial bodies is open to debate and not universally accepted.

Finally, the argument assumes that the author of the Qur’an was a human who could have easily made mistakes, which begs the question of why the author could not have also made mistakes in other parts of the text. It is important to critically evaluate all claims and not simply accept them as evidence of divine origin.

12. The argument that the frequency of earthquakes, the subjective passage of time, and the increase in deliberate murder provide evidence for the accuracy of Muhammad’s predictions about the day of judgment is flawed.

Firstly, the claim that earthquakes are hitting populated areas more frequently is not supported by data. While earthquakes may be hitting populated areas more often due to the increase in global population, the overall frequency of earthquakes has not significantly increased over time. Therefore, this cannot be used as evidence to support the prediction made by Muhammad.

Secondly, the subjective perception of time passing faster is a common experience among individuals and cultures throughout history. This experience is not unique to the present day and cannot be attributed to any specific event or phenomenon.

Thirdly, the claim that mass shootings and random acts of violence are on the rise is not entirely accurate. While there have been high-profile incidents of mass shootings in recent years, the overall rates of homicide and violent crime have been decreasing in many parts of the world. Additionally, the prediction of an increase in deliberate murder is vague and not specific to mass shootings or random acts of violence.

Moreover, the prediction of earthquakes, the subjective passage of time, and the increase in deliberate murder are all common occurrences that can be observed in any time period. These predictions are not unique to the day of judgment and cannot be used as evidence to support the idea of an impending apocalypse.

13. The claim that Muhammad advised to dip a fly that has fallen into someone’s drink fully before removing it because one wing has the ailment while the other has the cure is not scientifically accurate, and the statement that research has confirmed it is also incorrect.

There is no scientific evidence to support the idea that a fly’s wings have the ability to cure any ailments or diseases. Moreover, flies are known carriers of various diseases and bacteria that can be harmful to humans, including typhoid fever, cholera, and dysentery. Therefore, it is not advisable to consume food or drinks that have been contaminated by a fly.

Furthermore, the claim that research has recently confirmed this statement is not supported by any credible scientific sources. There is no evidence that any research has been conducted to support this claim, nor is there any evidence that the statement can be attributed to Muhammad.

In conclusion, the claim that Muhammad advised to dip a fly that has fallen into someone’s drink fully before removing it because one wing has the ailment while the other has the cure is not scientifically accurate. The claim that research has confirmed it is also false, as there is no credible scientific evidence to support this claim.’’
1. The Hadith mentioned, which states that wealth will become abundant and overflowing, is not limited to the Arabian Peninsula and implies a worldwide increase in prosperity. This prediction does not hold up, as 10% of the global population lives in extreme poverty, and in Muslim-majority countries such as Afghanistan and Yemen, this figure is closer to 80%. Even in the Arabian Peninsula, much of the region remains desert and arid land. Some areas have become greener due to human intervention, such as improved water management and increased vegetation planting. This change is not a result of divine prophecy, but of human action. Furthermore, in Muhammad’s time, some parts of the peninsula, like Riyadh, were already green. Thus, it is not surprising or miraculous that Muhammad might have predicted further greening in the region.

2. The Quran’s claim that Allah causes the chests of disbelievers to feel tight as if they are ascending into the sky is a misinterpretation of what happens during altitude gain. The human chest does not become tight at high altitudes; rather, it expands to accommodate the body’s increased need for oxygen in the thinner air. Thus, the Quranic verse contains a scientific error.

3. The Quran’s assertion that clouds are heavy is not miraculous. People in ancient times would have observed rain falling from clouds and realized that clouds contain water, which has weight. This observation is not evidence of divine inspiration in the Quran.

4. The health benefits of fasting have been known for centuries by various ancient cultures. In both ancient Greece and India, fasting was regarded as a means of improving health. Even the Greek physician Hippocrates, who lived 1,000 years before Islam, advised that eating while sick worsens the illness. Thus, the Quran’s mention of fasting’s health benefits is neither groundbreaking nor new.

5. The supposed barrier cited in the Quran, separating freshwater from saltwater, can actually be explained by the pycnocline zone. This natural occurrence describes the rapid change in water density due to variations in salt concentration and temperature. The Quran’s claim that a barrier prevents the mixing of fresh and saltwater contradicts this scientifically recognized phenomenon. Therefore, the Quran’s assertion is erroneous.

6. Pork can carry the parasite that causes trichinosis, but this is rare in developed countries with sanitary pork-raising and handling practices. Cooking pork to an internal temperature of at least 145°F (63°C) can kill any potential bacteria or parasites. The claim that pork causes Multiple Sclerosis, liver cancer, cirrhosis, and Yersinia is unsupported by scientific research. These illnesses have many possible causes, making the stance that pork is dangerous misleading.

7. Moderate alcohol consumption does not cause cancer for most individuals and, in some cases, can reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. Only excessive alcohol consumption has serious negative health effects. It is inaccurate and misleading to cite low cancer rates in Muslim-majority countries as evidence for the benefits of alcohol prohibition, as many other factors, such as environmental factors, lifestyle habits, and healthcare access, also influence cancer rates.

8. The Qur’an’s suggestion to isolate ill individuals during a pandemic is not a new or unique concept. The practice of isolating those suspected of having a contagious disease has been documented as far back as the Old Testament bible, in the book of Leviticus. Additionally, ancient Greece, another pre-Islamic civilization, practiced quarantine for contagious illnesses. This demonstrates that the Quran’s quarantine advice was not an original or miraculous idea.

9. The Qur’an’s use of past tense to describe future events does not constitute evidence of divine origin. Instead, it reflects unique grammatical features of the Arabic language; in particular, the preterite tense, which is commonly employed to refer to future events. As this same tense is used in classical Arabic literature written by humans, the Qur’an’s grammatical choices do not signify a divine authorship.

10. The prophecy that Muhammad would die of illness followed by his daughter Fatima’s death is not miraculous because, first of all, their infant son Ibrahim died before Fatima, contradicting Muhammad’s predictions. Moreover, even if the prophecy had been accurate, people frequently make correct predictions without divine guidance. Such a prophecy does not constitute divine proof.

11. The assertion that not directly disclosing that the Earth revolves around the sun in the Qur’an demonstrates its divine origin is flawed. The omission of a scientific fact does not provide evidence for divine knowledge. There were other scientific discoveries during Mohammad’s time that were accepted and celebrated, so it is unlikely that the revelation about Earth orbiting the sun would have discredited him. Furthermore, similar descriptions about celestial orbits can be found in ancient texts from other cultures, meaning the Qur’anic verse in question is up for interpretation and not unique.

12. The argument that increased earthquake frequency, faster time passage, and climbing rates of deliberate murder validate Mohammad’s predictions about the day of judgment is unconvincing. Earthquakes are not occurring more frequently, and while they may be hitting populated areas more often due to population growth, that trend cannot be used to support Mohammad’s prediction. Additionally, the subjective passage of time has always been a common experience among cultures, and while mass shootings and random acts of violence have increased in prevalence, overall rates of violent crime and homicide have been decreasing worldwide. Mohammad’s prediction does not specifically relate to these types of crimes and cannot be used as evidence to support an apocalypse.

13. The advice to dip a fly that has fallen into a drink fully before removing it, claiming that one wing has ailment while the other wing has the cure, is not supported by scientific evidence. In fact, flies can carry harmful bacteria and diseases, so it is unwise to consume anything contaminated by a fly. Furthermore, the assertion that recent research supports this claim is false, as there is no credible scientific evidence or reputable studies to confirm it.''+