Rewrite the entire text below, make it sound more coherent and better. Mention everything in great detail, including Hadithes and Quran Verses. Be very sceptical of the author Mohammad Hijab and also add some additional good arguments:

''Mohammad Hijab’s interpretation of the term “عظام” (itham) in the Quran may be misleading, as the term has consistently been used throughout the Quran to refer to bones, as evidenced in verses 35 and 82 of Surah Al-Mu’minun. In these verses, the Prophet addresses non-Muslims’ questions about the resurrection process and how they would be resurrected from bones in their graves. There is no instance in the Quran where “عظام” has been used to mean cartilage.

Hijab’s assertion that cartilage and bones belong to the same category is entirely incorrect, as cartilage and bones are two distinct types of connective tissue, each with different properties. Additionally, the phrase “clothed the bones with flesh” is inaccurate, as it suggests that one tissue envelops the other, while in reality, they develop concurrently. Moreover, the claim that “the flesh developed into bones” is also incorrect.

In response to Hijab’s argument that the Quran refers to precursor cartilage models of bones, this theory lacks credibility, as it fails to explain why the Quran specifically mentions bones and not cartilage (ghudhroof), which eventually gets replaced by bones (itham). The Quran also mentions a sequence of events in verse 23:14, stating, “nutfah…nutfah…alaqah…alaqah…lump, then we made the lump bones, then we clothed the bones with flesh.” However, modern scientific understanding of the musculoskeletal system’s development does not support this description.

The actual process of ossification or bone formation begins after muscle tissue has developed, and the process of muscle formation cannot be described as “clothing” the bones. Both processes occur simultaneously, with bones continuing to grow and ossify alongside muscle development. The idea that the Quran was referring to precursor cartilage models of bones is also not supported by evidence, as the Quran mentions bone, not cartilage, which only begins to form after muscle tissue has already developed.

The natural reading of verse 23:14 suggests that bones already possess a meaningful shape and presence before they are “clothed with flesh.” However, the actual process of chondrification, which forms the cartilage precursors to bones, only begins after muscle formation has already started. Additional evidence in the Quran, such as verse 2:259, suggests that the description of bones being “clothed with flesh” refers to already recognizable bones, which is not in line with the scientific understanding of the development of the musculoskeletal system.

Therefore, it appears that Hijab’s argument fails to adequately address this discrepancy in the Quran. A more robust analysis, grounded in empirical evidence and a critical understanding of both religious texts and scientific knowledge, is necessary for a comprehensive evaluation of this issue.

It is also essential to consider the historical context of the Quran when discussing the development of scientific knowledge. For example, Muslims often claim that the Quran’s teachings on embryology were unknown to humans 1400 years ago. However, the Quran’s ideas about embryology can be traced back to the Roman doctor, Galen, who lived 500 years before Muhammad and described embryological development in greater detail in his text De Semine.

Muslims may argue that Muhammad could not have known about Galen’s work, but the historical records suggest otherwise. For example, Sergius of Reshaina, a renowned Greek translator, translated several of Galen’s books, and he was a Nestorian who moved to Jundishapur in Persia. Interestingly, Al-Harith ibn Kalada, one of Muhammad’s closest followers and a doctor that Muhammad frequently used, had studied at that school, according to Muslim historians Ibn Abi Usaybia and al-Qifti. Therefore, it is possible that the Quran’s descriptions of embryology were influenced by pre-existing scientific knowledge.

The problem is that nowhere in the verse it say that flesh was created before, after or simultaneously with the bones...
Nor it say that flesh was created from boned or the opposite
It juste says that God has made flesh like a cloath for bones, wich was something that people at that time knew, and something that we still today know and that science doesn't contradict...

The Quran also failed to mention the most important part of the human development at embryonic stage.  It’s the HEART that develops at around day 20, why did the Quran miss the most important part and moved on to what Aristotle and Galen said.  Today the first thing we see clearly moving at the very early stage is the HEART, why is it missing.''