You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


“Data rights are human rights.” That’s the rallying cry that emerges from The Great Hack, Karim Amer and Jehane Noujaim’s startling feature-length Netflix documentary, available on the streaming service from today.

You’d do well to make it your mantra. You should try chanting it the next time you log into your Facebook account. Better still, do it whenever you finally get around to deactivating or deleting it forever.

The film, which runs a hefty two hours and is dense in detail, much of it disturbing and some downright scary, should chill to the marrow anyone who cares about democracy and its future, which is looking more uncertain by the week.

Ostensibly, it’s about the Cambridge Analytica scandal: the harvesting by the British data research company of millions of personal details from Facebook users, who gleefully responded to an innocuous-looking “personality questionnaire”, in the process handing over their likes, dislikes, fears and, crucially, prejudices.

But it’s also about the illusion of freedom of choice, the manipulation of voters and the fragility of democracy, and how easy it can be polluted, corrupted.

Cambridge Analytica has tampered in a lot of elections worldwide — a staggering number, briskly ticked off here in a gobsmacking montage.

But its two biggest clients were the 2016 Trump election campaign and the Leave.EU campaign, headed by Arron Banks, the chief Bad Boy of Brexit, who tried to prevent the documentary being shown.

This vast treasure trove of data was massaged into content — propaganda, woven together from lies and misinformation — targeted at the “persuadables”, those who hadn’t completely made up their minds and could be easily swayed in one direction or the other. Trump or Hillary? Leave or remain? All it took was a nudge.

“We’re talking about building a personality profile of every voter,” says Christopher Wylie, the former Cambridge Analytica employee-turned-whistleblower. “You’re playing with the psychology of an entire nation.”

One of the most jaw-dropping statistics, among many, the film throws up is that the Trump campaign spent a million dollars a week on Facebook adverts, while the Clinton campaign spent only a fraction of that. This was the nudge.

The Great Hack features a rogues’ gallery of liars and chancers: Trump, Farage, Bannon, former Cambridge Analytica CEO Alexander Nix, who’s shown blatantly lying that the company has no involvement with the Trump or Brexit brigade, juxtaposed with documentary evidence, not least the undercover Channel 4 investigation, of him boasting about how he and his cohorts won it for both of them.

And let’s not forget Facebook supremo Mark Zuckerberg, whose social media platform was and still is the toxic enabler of all the meddling and manipulating. That’s the bigger story.

There’s a hero, too: The Guardian and Observer reporter Carole Cadwalladr, whose fearless, tireless reporting, in the face of legal threats and coordinated online abuse, blew the lid off the story.

But the documentary unfolds mostly through two parallel journeys: that of American academic David Carroll, who used the UK legal system to force Cambridge Analytica to release the data it holds on him (he ultimately failed when the company folded up its tent), and of former company higher-up Brittany Kaiser, a key figure at the core of all the dirty deeds who’s become a bit of a whistleblower herself.

Repentance or self-preservation? Hard to say — she’s so evasive, her shadow might have trouble trusting her — and harder still to care. She’s not the victim here, even though she acts the part.

It’s a gripping, must-see film, yet ultimately a depressing one, because you know that this is still going on every day, invisibly. Only the company names have changed.

The Great Hack is now streaming on Netflix.

Herald