Could you correct this survey paper for me :Title: 
Optimization Techniques for Spiking Neural Network-Based Intrusion Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Survey

Abstract: 
      As cybersecurity threats evolve, the demand for advanced Intrusion Detection Systems (IDSs) is more critical than ever. Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs), inspired by biological neural systems, have emerged as a promising approach to IDS due to their speed, energy efficiency, and ability to process temporal data. However, balancing accuracy and efficiency in SNN-based IDS remains a challenge. This review analyzes optimization techniques for SNN-based IDS, aiming to balance accuracy and efficiency. Network architecture optimization techniques, such as modifying the connectivity patterns and implementing hierarchical structures, improve SNN-based IDS accuracy and efficiency. Learning algorithm optimization techniques, including tuning hyperparameters and adaptive learning rates, enhance SNNs convergence speed and generalization performance. Data preprocessing and feature engineering techniques, such as normalization, dimensionality reduction, and feature selection, improve the overall performance and robustness of SNN-based IDS. The review emphasizes the importance of customizing SNN architectures, optimizing learning algorithms, and using effective data preprocessing techniques. It underscores the potential of SNN-based IDS in improving network security while identifying areas for further research. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners in cybersecurity, intrusion detection, and artificial intelligence. It provides insights into the effectiveness of various optimization techniques and highlights promising directions for future research and development.

Keywords: Cyber Security, Network Security, Optimization Techniques, Accuracy, Efficiency.

1.	Introduction: 
            The advent of big data and the increasing need for real-time processing have prompted a surge of interest in Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) as a promising solution for intrusion detection systems (IDS). Inspired by the functioning of biological neural systems, SNNs offer inherent advantages in terms of speed, energy efficiency, and the ability to process temporal data. However, designing SNN-based IDS that simultaneously achieve high accuracy and efficiency remains a significant challenge.
To address the challenges faced by SNN-based IDS, researchers have turned to advanced optimization techniques that aim to reconcile the accuracy and efficiency trade-offs inherent in these systems. These techniques focus on optimizing the structure, training, and deployment of SNNs to maximize their operational efficacy within the constraints of processing power and time sensitivity. Recent advancements in this domain include the development of novel learning rules, synaptic models, and hybrid approaches that integrate SNNs with other machine learning paradigms.
This paper provides a comprehensive survey of optimization techniques developed for spiking neural network-based intrusion detection systems (SNN-based IDS). We categorize these techniques into network architecture optimization, learning algorithm optimization, and data preprocessing and feature engineering. It delves into the intricacies of SNN architectures, learning mechanisms, and implementation details that enable these networks to function effectively as components of IDS. Moreover, it critically analyzes the performance trade-offs involved when integrating SNNs into the IDS framework, highlighting key areas of research progress and delineating avenues for future inquiry.
We present a detailed overview of each technique, highlighting its advantages, limitations, and potential for improving SNN-based IDS performance. Furthermore, we discuss open challenges and future research directions in this area, paving the way for further advancements in SNN-based IDS optimization. This review aims to guide and inform the cybersecurity community. It seeks to ensure that the deployment of SNN-based intrusion detection systems is optimized for both accuracy and efficiency, thereby contributing to the fortification of our increasingly connected world.

2.	Optimization Techniques for Enhanced SNNs-IDS Performance:
            The intersection of cybersecurity and advancing neural architectures has propelled extensive research into optimization techniques for Spiking Neural Network-based Intrusion Detection Systems (SNN-based IDS). Driven by the intention to boost performance, such as accuracy and processing efficiency, research has unfolded across multiple dimensions of these complex systems. Here, we delve deeply into three critical areas of optimization: network architecture, learning algorithms, and data preprocessing with feature engineering. Each category is critical for enhancing SNN-based IDS and ensuring they remain resilient against an ever-evolving landscape of cyber threats:
2.1. Network Architecture Optimization: 
       Network architecture optimization involves optimizing the structure of the SNN, such as the number of layers, neurons, and connections, to improve its performance. Pruning techniques, weight sharing, and layer merging are some commonly used methods for SNN architecture optimization. Studies have demonstrated that the choice of network architecture significantly impacts the performance of SNN-based IDS. Architectures that incorporate recurrent connections, which allow feedback loops, lateral inhibition, which imitates the brain’s mechanism to improve contrast in signaling, have been associated with enhanced detection capabilities and improved generalization to new attack types. and specialized neuron models have shown promising results in improving accuracy and efficiency. 
Researchers have explored different network topologies, neuron models, and synaptic plasticity rules to improve the accuracy and efficiency of SNN-based IDS. Examples include the work of Yan et al. (2024); Koravuna et al. (2023); Guo et al. (2023); (2023); Zarzoor et al. (2023); Louati et al. (2023); Yin et al. (2023); Meng et al. (2023); Lew et al. (2023).
Researchers have also proposed a Neural Architecture Search (NAS) approach for finding better SNN architectures. The approach selects the architecture that can represent diverse spike activation patterns across different layers and leverages the temporal information among the spikes by searching for feedforward connections as well as backward connections (i.e., temporal feedback connections) between layers (Kim et al. 2022).
Pioneering work by researchers such as Yan et al. (2024) and Koravuna et al. (2023) has introduced topologies that underscore the importance of synaptic plasticity rules and specialized models of neuron dynamics. Individual studies have demonstrated that adapting the neuron model, whether it’s to mimic biological realism or to simplify for computational efficiency, plays a significant role in overall system performance. Furthermore, innovations presented by Louati et al. (2023) and Meng et al. (2023) provide insights into alternate synaptic models and learning paradigms, further enriching the architectural complexity and potential of SNNs.
Notably, the recent proposal by Kim et al. (2022) to employ Neural Architecture Search (NAS) has signaled a paradigm shift in SNN development. By employing NAS, researchers are empowered to explore a wider, more novel space of architectural design, potentially identifying unique configurations that better capture the temporal dynamics of spiking data. NAS can traverse both feedforward and recurrent frameworks, yielding architectures that are not only more sophisticated but also more attuned to the nuances of cyber threat detection.
In summary, network architecture optimization for SNNs is a rapidly evolving field, with researchers exploring various methods and techniques to improve the performance of SNN-based applications, such as IDS. The use of NAS and the exploration of diverse architectural designs hold promise for advancing the capabilities of SNNs in capturing the temporal dynamics of spiking data and enhancing their effectiveness in cyber threat detection.

2.2 Learning Algorithm Optimization: 
          In the optimization of SNN learning algorithms, a key focus is to enhance convergence speed, ensure stability, and improve the generalization of training data to practical scenarios. Innovative learning rules tailored to the temporal dynamics of spikes, such as spike-timing-dependent plasticity (STDP) and reward-modulated STDP, have been developed. Hyperparameter tuning, which has been somewhat of an art, is now being refined systematically through metaheuristic algorithms. These strategies have successfully navigated vast hyperparameter spaces to discover configurations that elevate performance.
Javanshir et al. (2023) and Xing et al. (2023) illustrate the profound capabilities of metaheuristic algorithms in optimizing training processes, leading to breakthroughs in SNN accuracy and efficiency. Studies by Schmidgall & Hays (2023) on multi-objective optimization are particularly compelling, as they strive to balance competing objectives—like minimizing network size while maximizing detection rates—resulting in cost-effective, operational models for real-world IDS applications.
Hybrid algorithms are gaining traction, amalgamating different learning approaches’ strengths. For instance, Lin et al. (2023) and Apolinario et al. (2023) have shown that blending nuances from reinforcement learning and deep learning with traditional SNN algorithms can significantly improve learning velocities and accuracies without incurring excessive computational costs.
Multi-objective optimization frameworks in SNN training, such as Bayesian hyperparameter Pareto optimization, multi-objective differential evolution, neuroevolutionary guided hybrid SNN training, and the evolutionary optimization framework called EONS, are designed to delicately negotiate the trade-offs between objectives. These frameworks are optimizing SNN hyperparameters for computational efficiency, accuracy, and training duration, along with other metrics, simultaneously.
In the realm of hybrid learning algorithms, the integration of reinforcement learning and deep learning, as demonstrated by Lin et al. (2023) and Apolinario et al. (2023), can considerably augment the learning rate and accuracy without onerous computational demands. Strategies such as neuroevolutionary-based hybrid SNN training, as presented by Javanshir et al. (2023) and Xing et al. (2023), efficiently optimize SNN-specific performance, showcasing advantages in accuracy-latency tradeoffs and emphasizing the need for significance-driven layer wise SNN optimization schemes. 

2.3. Data Preprocessing and Feature Engineering: 
       Data preprocessing and feature engineering play a crucial role in improving the performance of SNN-based IDS. Various techniques have been explored by researchers to enhance the performance of SNN-based IDS, including data preprocessing steps are critical for ensuring quality inputs that are normalized, scaled, and devoid of irrelevant noise. Moreover, feature engineering holds a vital position in the optimization process. Selecting and extracting the most informative features is not just about improving detection accuracy, it’s also about reducing computational requirements by focusing the network’s attention on what truly matters. 
Researchers have explored different techniques for data preprocessing, feature extraction and feature selection to enhance the performance of SNN-based IDS. Examples include the work of Cachi et al. (2023); Kasongo (2023); Liu et al. (2023); Zhang & Wang (2023); Wang et al. (2023).
Cachi et al. (2023) and Kasongo (2023) have explored various methodologies for feature selection, while research by Liu et al. (2023) has pioneered techniques in feature extraction that effectively distill data into its most critical aspects. Innovative work by Zhang & Wang (2023) and Wang et al. (2023) has shown that data augmentation the process of synthetically expanding the training dataset can go a long way in improving SNN robustness and versatility, effectively simulating diverse attack scenarios that the system may face. 
The bustling activity in data preprocessing and feature engineering research exhibits a trend toward more intelligent, data-driven SNN configurations. The delicate art of selecting features that maximize relevance while minimizing redundancy continues to be an active field, yielding strategies that bolster the predictive power of SNN-based IDS.
The convergence of architectural, algorithmic, and preprocessing innovations is a testament to the dynamic and integrative nature of optimization in SNN-based IDS. Each contribution, whether it offers a marginal improvement or a groundbreaking development, iterates the system closer to the ultimate goal of creating an IDS that not only protects digital assets but also adapts and evolves in lockstep with the threat landscape.
While the current trajectory of research is promising, there remains a significant journey ahead. The myriad of challenges, from architectural complexities to algorithmic fine-tuning and data quality assurance, calls for an expansive, cross-disciplinary effort. As methodologies mature and new insights emerge, the aspiration of achieving an optimized SNN-based IDS one that is both steadfastly accurate and effectively efficient comes increasingly into focus. Through the ongoing synthesis of innovations, future research is expected to continue breaking barriers, pushing SNN-based IDS to become a mainstay in the cybersecurity toolbox.
Moreover, employing transfer learning and knowledge transfer can aid SNN-based IDS in learning from existing models or knowledge bases, thus minimizing extensive training on new data. Exploring efficient hardware implementations and platforms such as neuromorphic computing can also enhance performance and conserve energy. In summary, leveraging transfer learning, knowledge transfer, and efficient hardware, inclusive of neuromorphic computing platforms, holds great promise in improving both the performance and energy efficiency of SNN-based IDS.




3. Open Challenges and Future Directions in SNN-based IDS: 
3.1 Challenge:
One of the foremost challenges in realizing the potential of Spiking Neural Networks (SNNs) in intrusion detection systems (IDS) is the development of efficient and accurate architectures. Intrusion detection data is inherently high-dimensional and complex, encompassing diverse attack vectors and patterns. Traditional SNN architectures may struggle to process such data effectively, leading to suboptimal performance.
To address this, researchers have begun to explore complex, multi-layered SNN architectures with advanced learning mechanisms tailored for high-dimensional pattern recognition. Advances in computational neuroscience and neuromorphic engineering are providing insights into more brain-like computational models, which could lead to breakthroughs in the accuracy and speed of SNN-based IDS. However, these complex models can be computationally expensive and may require novel hardware solutions to operate at scale.
Another critical challenge is designing learning algorithms capable of training SNNs with limited labeled data. Supervised learning methods, which currently dominate the SNN landscape, rely heavily on extensive labeled datasets. Obtaining such datasets for intrusion detection is often impractical due to the dynamic nature of cybersecurity threats.
Future work must focus on semi-supervised, unsupervised, and reinforcement learning techniques that can effectively leverage unlabeled or partially labeled data. This includes developing novel plasticity rules and learning mechanisms inspired by biological brains that can continuously adapt to new information without extensive retraining, a concept known as lifelong learning.
Effective data preprocessing and feature engineering are vital for improving the discriminative capabilities of SNN-based IDS. Raw network traffic data is noisy and contains irrelevant information that can obscure malicious activity. Thus, identifying optimal features that capture the characteristics of intrusion attempts is necessary.
Advanced signal processing techniques, such as wavelet transforms, and data dimensionality reduction methods, like principal component analysis (PCA), could be incorporated to distill raw data into meaningful features. Moreover, feature engineering could be enhanced using autoencoders or even deep SNNs to identify patterns not evident to standard techniques.
Integrating SNNs with other machine learning paradigms holds promise for boosting IDS performance. Deep learning models, especially Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs), have shown excellent success in pattern recognition tasks. By combining these models’ strengths with the temporal processing abilities of SNNs, hybrid systems could achieve superior anomaly detection rates.
Moreover, ensemble learning techniques that aggregate multiple individual classifiers’ predictions could be applied to SNN-based IDS to improve robustness and accuracy. The ensemble could include varieties of SNN architectures and other machine learning models trained on different feature subsets or concept drift strategies to handle changing attack patterns.

3.2 Future Direction:
Integrating SNN-based IDS with other security technologies is a significant future direction. By coupling SNNs with firewalls, honeypots, and Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) systems, a more comprehensive and responsive security structure can be established. This integration requires standardized communication protocols and APIs to allow seamless data exchange and collective threat intelligence.
Investigation into hybrid IDS architectures that combine SNN-based approaches with other IDS types, including statistical and traditional machine learning methods, is promising. This two-pronged approach could exploit the temporal advantage of SNNs and the robustness of other methods, providing a more accurate and versatile defense mechanism.
Transfer learning and knowledge transfer techniques can accelerate the adoption of SNN-based IDS by minimizing the need for retraining on new data. Adopting models or knowledge from related domains could facilitate a quicker response to emerging threats. This direction necessitates the development of adaptable SNN frameworks capable of generalizing learned patterns to novel scenarios.
The interpretability of SNNs is crucial for trust and reliability in security applications. Developing methods that explain and interpret SNN decisions can bridge the gap between complex model behavior and human-understandable rationale. Transparency is also essential for system auditing and compliance with regulations such as General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Finally, the deployment of SNN-based IDS on efficient hardware platforms represent a burgeoning area of exploration. The energy efficiency and real-time processing afforded by neuromorphic computing hardware could transform IDS capabilities. The evolution of such technologies will enable the deployment of SNN-based IDS at scale, even in resource-constrained environments.
These challenges and future directions sketch a roadmap for advancing SNN-based IDS. This research field is exciting and multidisciplinary, requiring concerted efforts from computer scientists, neuroscientists, and cybersecurity experts. As advancements continue, SNN-based IDS are poised to become a formidable tool in the cybersecurity arsenal, countering sophisticated cyber threats with unprecedented efficiency and intelligence.

4.	Conclusion:
           SNN-based IDS offer a promising approach for intrusion detection due to their inherent advantages in terms of speed, energy efficiency, and the ability to process temporal data. However, optimizing these systems to achieve high accuracy and efficiency remains a challenging task. This review has provided a comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art optimization techniques developed for SNN-based IDS, covering network architecture optimization, learning algorithm optimization, and data preprocessing and feature engineering. By addressing the open challenges and exploring future research directions, we can further improve the performance and applicability of SNN-based IDS, contributing to the development of more secure and efficient intrusion detection systems. Future research should focus on addressing the challenges of limited training data, real-time implementation and handling concept drift (adaptability to evolving threats). This will further improve the effectiveness of SNN-based IDS.






References:
Yan, S., Meng, Q., Xiao, M., Wang, Y., & Lin, Z. (2024). Sampling complex topology structures for spiking neural networks. Neural Networks, 106121.
Koravuna, S., Rückert, U., & Jungeblut, T. (2023). Exploring spiking neural networks: a comprehensive analysis of mathematical models and applications. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience, 17.
Guo, L., Liu, D., Wu, Y., & Xu, G. (2023). Comparison of spiking neural networks with different topologies based on anti-disturbance ability under external noise. Neurocomputing, 529, 113-127.
Zarzoor, A. R., Al-Jamali, N. A. S., & Qader, D. A. A. (2023). Intrusion detection method for internet of things based on the spiking neural network and decision tree method. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 13(2), 2278.
Louati, H., Louati, A., Bechikh, S., & Kariri, E. (2023). Embedding channel pruning within the CNN architecture design using a bi-level evolutionary approach. The Journal of Supercomputing, 1-34.
Yin, R., Kim, Y., Li, Y., Moitra, A., Satpute, N., Hambitzer, A., & Panda, P. (2023). Workload-balanced pruning for sparse spiking neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06746.
Meng, L. W., Qiao, G. C., Zhang, X. Y., Bai, J., Zuo, Y., Zhou, P. J., ... & Hu, S. G. (2023). An efficient pruning and fine-tuning method for deep spiking neural network. Applied Intelligence, 53(23), 28910-28923.
Lew, D., Tang, H., & Park, J. (2023). Neuron pruning in temporal domain for energy efficient SNN processor design. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17.
Kim, Y., Li, Y., Park, H., Venkatesha, Y., & Panda, P. (2022, October). Neural architecture search for spiking neural networks. In European Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 36-56). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.
Bethi, Y., Xu, Y., Cohen, G., Van Schaik, A., & Afshar, S. (2022). An optimized deep spiking neural network architecture without gradients. IEEE Access, 10, 97912-97929.
Yamazaki, K., Vo-Ho, V. K., Bulsara, D., & Le, N. (2022). Spiking neural networks and their applications: A Review. Brain Sciences, 12(7), 863.
Manna, D. L., Vicente-Sola, A., Kirkland, P., Bihl, T. J., & Di Caterina, G. (2022). Simple and complex spiking neurons: Perspectives and analysis in a simple STDP scenario. Neuromorphic Computing and Engineering, 2(4), 044009.
Lin, X., Zhang, Z., & Zheng, D. (2023). Supervised Learning Algorithm Based on Spike Train Inner Product for Deep Spiking Neural Networks. Brain Sciences, 13(2), 168.
Guo, W., Fouda, M. E., Eltawil, A. M., & Salama, K. N. (2023). Efficient training of spiking neural networks with temporally-truncated local backpropagation through time. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, 1047008.
Xing, Y., Liu, Y., Liu, T., Hu, Y., Liao, W., Sheik, S., & Qiao, N. (2023). Chip-In-Loop SNN Proxy Learning: A New Method for Efficient Training of Spiking Neural Networks. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, 1323121.
Apolinario, M. P. E., & Roy, K. (2023). S-tllr: Stdp-inspired temporal local learning rule for spiking neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.15220.
Javanshir, A., Nguyen, T. T., Mahmud, M. P., & Kouzani, A. Z. (2023). Training Spiking Neural Networks with Metaheuristic Algorithms. Applied Sciences, 13(8), 4809.
Schmidgall, S., & Hays, J. (2023). Meta-SpikePropamine: learning to learn with synaptic plasticity in spiking neural networks. Frontiers in neuroscience, 17, 1183321.
Jiang, C., & Zhang, Y. (2023). A Noise-Based Novel Strategy for Faster SNN Training. Neural Computation, 35(9), 1593-1608.
Siddique, A., Vai, M. I., & Pun, S. H. (2023). A low-cost neuromorphic learning engine based on a high performance supervised SNN learning algorithm. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 6280.
Lu, S., & Sengupta, A. (2022). Neuroevolution guided hybrid spiking neural network training. Frontiers in neuroscience, 16, 838523.
Javanshir, A., Nguyen, T. T., Mahmud, M. P., & Kouzani, A. Z. (2022). Advancements in algorithms and neuromorphic hardware for spiking neural networks. Neural Computation, 34(6), 1289-1328.
Zhao, R., Yang, Z., Zheng, H., Wu, Y., Liu, F., Wu, Z., ... & Shi, L. (2022). A framework for the general design and computation of hybrid neural networks. Nature communications, 13(1), 3427.
Schuman, C. D., Kulkarni, S. R., Parsa, M., Mitchell, J. P., & Kay, B. (2022). Opportunities for neuromorphic computing algorithms and applications. Nature Computational Science, 2(1), 10-19.
Cachi, P. G., Ventura, S., & Cios, K. J. (2023). Improving Spiking Neural Network Performance with Auxiliary Learning. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 5(3), 1010-1022.
Kasongo, S. M. (2023). A deep learning technique for intrusion detection system using a Recurrent Neural Networks based framework. Computer Communications, 199, 113-125.
Liu, Z., Wang, Y., Feng, F., Liu, Y., Li, Z., & Shan, Y. (2023). A DDoS Detection Method Based on Feature Engineering and Machine Learning in Software-Defined Networks. Sensors, 23(13), 6176.
Zhang, Y., & Wang, Z. (2023). Feature engineering and model optimization-based classification method for network intrusion detection. Applied Sciences, 13(16), 9363.
Wang, Y. C., Houng, Y. C., Chen, H. X., & Tseng, S. M. (2023). Network Anomaly Intrusion Detection Based on Deep Learning Approach. Sensors, 23(4), 2171.
Ali, M., Haque, M. U., Durad, M. H., Usman, A., Mohsin, S. M., Mujlid, H., & Maple, C. (2023). Effective network intrusion detection using stacking-based ensemble approach. International Journal of Information Security, 22(6), 1781-1798.
Chuang, H. M., & Ye, L. J. (2023). Applying Transfer Learning Approaches for Intrusion Detection in Software-Defined Networking. Sustainability, 15(12), 9395.
Ullah, F., Ullah, S., Srivastava, G., & Lin, J. C. W. (2023). IDS-INT: Intrusion detection system using transformer-based transfer learning for imbalanced network traffic. Digital Communications and Networks.
Kheddar, H., Himeur, Y., & Awad, A. I. (2023). Deep Transfer Learning Applications in Intrusion Detection Systems: A Comprehensive Review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10550.
Sarhan, M., Layeghy, S., Moustafa, N., Gallagher, M., & Portmann, M. (2022). Feature extraction for machine learning-based intrusion detection in IoT networks. Digital Communications and Networks.
Dahou, A., Abd Elaziz, M., Chelloug, S. A., Awadallah, M. A., Al-Betar, M. A., Al-Qaness, M. A., & Forestiero, A. (2022). Intrusion detection system for IoT based on deep learning and modified reptile search algorithm. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2022.
Thirimanne, S. P., Jayawardana, L., Yasakethu, L., Liyanaarachchi, P., & Hewage, C. (2022). Deep neural network based real-time intrusion detection system. SN Computer Science, 3(2), 145.
Thuy, T. T. T., Thuan, L. D., Duc, N. H., & Minh, H. T. (2023, June). A Study on Heuristic Algorithms Combined with LR on a DNN-Based IDS Model to Detect IoT Attacks. In MENDEL (Vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 62-70).
AlOmar, B., Trabelsi, Z., & Saidi, F. (2023, June). Attention-Based Deep Learning Modelling for Intrusion Detection. In European Conference on Cyber Warfare and Security (Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 22-32).
Pandey, R., Pandey, M., & Nazarov, A. (2023, March). Enhanced DDoS Detection using Machine Learning. In 2023 6th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Sohail, A., Ayisha, B., Hameed, I., Zafar, M. M., & Khan, A. (2023). Deep Neural Networks based Meta-Learning for Network Intrusion Detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.09394.
Almejarb, R. M., Sallabi, O. M., Bushaala, F. F., Mohamed, A. A., Fawzi, A., & Adel, R. (2023, May). A Proposed Method for Detecting Network Intrusion Using Deep Learning Approach. In 2023 IEEE 3rd International Maghreb Meeting of the Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (MI-STA) (pp. 83-88). IEEE.
Abad, G., Ersoy, O., Picek, S., & Urbieta, A. (2023). Sneaky Spikes: Uncovering Stealthy Backdoor Attacks in Spiking Neural Networks with Neuromorphic Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.06279.
Chen, H., & Chen, L. (2023, June). Deep-learning-based intrusion detection methods. In International Conference on Computer Network Security and Software Engineering (CNSSE 2023) (Vol. 12714, pp. 8-14). SPIE.
Almejarb, R. M., Sallabi, O. M., Bushaala, F. F., Mohamed, A. A., Fawzi, A., & Adel, R. (2023, May). A Proposed Method for Detecting Network Intrusion Using Deep Learning Approach. In 2023 IEEE 3rd International Maghreb Meeting of the Conference on Sciences and Techniques of Automatic Control and Computer Engineering (MI-STA) (pp. 83-88). IEEE.   
Maryposonia, A. (2023, April). An Efficient Network Intrusion Detection System for Distributed Networks using Machine Learning Technique. In 2023 7th International Conference on Trends in Electronics and Informatics (ICOEI) (pp. 1258-1263). IEEE.
Mekala, S., & Dasari, K. B. (2023, May). NetBIOS DDoS Attacks Detection With Machine Learning Classification Algorithms. In 2023 International Conference on Advancement in Computation & Computer Technologies (InCACCT) (pp. 176-179). IEEE.
Kartal, B., & Üstündağ, B. B. (2023, February). Energy and Entropy based Intelligence Metric for Performance Estimation in DNNs. In 2023 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC) (pp. 468-473). IEEE.
Singh, R., Kumar, M., & Sharma, S. (2023, March). Artificial Intelligence based Model Using Various Machine Learning Techniques to detect DDoS Attack. In 2023 6th International Conference on Information Systems and Computer Networks (ISCON) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
Kim, T., & Pak, W. (2023). Scalable Inline Network-Intrusion Detection System with Minimized Memory Requirement. Electronics, 12(9), 2061.
Farhan, B. I., & Jasim, A. D. (2023). IMPROVING DETECTION FOR INTRUSION USING DEEP LSTM WITH HYBRID FEATURE SELECTION METHOD. Iraqi Journal of Information and Communication Technology, 6(1), 40-50.
Shen, J., Xu, Q., Liu, J. K., Wang, Y., Pan, G., & Tang, H. (2023). ESL-SNNs: An evolutionary structure learning strategy for spiking neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03693.
De Geeter, F., Ernst, D., & Drion, G. (2023). Spike-based computation using classical recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.03623.
Bakhsh, S. A., Khan, M. A., Ahmed, F., Alshehri, M. S., Ali, H., & Ahmad, J. (2023). Enhancing IoT network security through deep learning-powered Intrusion Detection System. Internet of Things, 24, 100936.
Kamalakkannan, D., Menaga, D., Shobana, S., Daya Sagar, K. V., Rajagopal, R., & Tiwari, M. (2023). A Detection of Intrusions Based on Deep Learning. Cybernetics and Systems, 1-15.
Revathy, S., & Priya, S. S. (2023). Enhancing the Efficiency of Attack Detection System Using Feature selection and Feature Discretization Methods. International Journal on Recent and Innovation Trends in Computing and Communication, 11, 156-160.
Samata, K., Raman, D., Saravanan, S., & Saminathan, R. (2023). New Intrusion Detection System Based on Neural Networks and Clustering. In E3S Web of Conferences (Vol. 391, p. 01086). EDP Sciences.
Silivery, A. K., Rao, K. R. M., & Kumar, L. K. (2023). An Effective Deep Learning Based Multi-Class Classification of DoS and DDoS Attack Detection. International journal of electrical and computer engineering systems, 14(4), 421-431.
Najafimehr, M., Zarifzadeh, S., & Mostafavi, S. (2023). DDoS attacks and machine‐learning‐based detection methods: A survey and taxonomy. Engineering Reports, e12697.
Alahmadi, A. A., Aljabri, M., Alhaidari, F., Alharthi, D. J., Rayani, G. E., Marghalani, L. A., ... & Bajandouh, S. A. (2023). DDoS Attack Detection in IoT-Based Networks Using Machine Learning Models: A Survey and Research Directions. Electronics, 12(14), 3103.
Chua, T. H., & Salam, I. (2023). Evaluation of Machine Learning Algorithms in Network-Based Intrusion Detection Using Progressive Dataset. Symmetry, 15(6), 1251.
Gutierrez-Garcia, J. L., Sanchez-DelaCruz, E., & Pozos-Parra, M. D. P. (2023, March). A Review of Intrusion Detection Systems Using Machine Learning: Attacks, Algorithms and Challenges. In Future of Information and Communication Conference (pp. 59-78). Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland.