You will receive a question-answer pair. Your task is to:

1. Decompose the answer into a sequence of numbered steps ("Step 1", "Step 2", etc.).
2. For each step, include a reasoning description and assign a confidence score (a float between 0 and 1).
3. For **accepted answers**, ensure reasoning steps are correct, with confidence scores that progressively increase as the steps approach the final answer.
4. For **rejected answers**, introduce flaws or errors in reasoning steps, and use inconsistent or lower confidence scores.

Please output the response in the JSON format below, following the example provided.


---

*Expected JSON Output Format:*

{
  "question": "[Insert question text here]",
  "accepted_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "[Describe the first reasoning step here]",
      "confidence_score": [Float between 0 and 1, e.g., 0.7]
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "[Describe the next reasoning step]",
      "confidence_score": [Incrementally higher float, e.g., 0.8]
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "[Continue describing each step with incrementally higher scores]",
      "confidence_score": [Approaching 1, e.g., 0.9]
    }
    // Continue until the final reasoning step
  },
  "rejected_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "[Introduce an incorrect or misleading reasoning step here]",
      "confidence_score": [Lower or inconsistent float, e.g., 0.5]
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "[Add a flawed or irrelevant reasoning step]",
      "confidence_score": [Inconsistent or lower float, e.g., 0.4]
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "[Continue with errors or inconsistencies in reasoning]",
      "confidence_score": [Non-incremental or lower float, e.g., 0.6]
    }
    // Continue until the final flawed reasoning step
  }
}

---

*Example JSON Output:*

{
  "question": "What are the primary causes of climate change?",
  "accepted_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "Identify human activities as significant contributors to climate change.",
      "confidence_score": 0.7
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "Specify fossil fuel burning as a major source of greenhouse gases.",
      "confidence_score": 0.8
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "Explain how deforestation reduces CO2 absorption, increasing atmospheric CO2.",
      "confidence_score": 0.9
    }
  },
  "rejected_answer": {
    "Step 1": {
      "reasoning": "Suggest natural factors as primary contributors to climate change.",
      "confidence_score": 0.5
    },
    "Step 2": {
      "reasoning": "Mention volcanic activity as a significant greenhouse gas source, incorrect for recent climate trends.",
      "confidence_score": 0.4
    },
    "Step 3": {
      "reasoning": "Briefly describe human activities without identifying specific sources.",
      "confidence_score": 0.6
    }
  }
}

Question: Given the points $(x_1,y_1)$ and $(x_2,y_2)$, find the number of integer values of $n$ for which the point $(x_1+y_1n,y_2+nx_2)$ lies inside the rectangle defined by the points $(0,0)$, $(4,0)$, $(4,5)$, and $(0,5)$.
Answer: To find the number of integer values of $n$ for which the point $(x_1+y_1n,y_2+nx_2)$ lies inside the rectangle defined by the points $(0,0)$, $(4,0)$, $(4,5)$, and $(0,5)$, we need to satisfy the conditions of the rectangle's boundaries.

The boundaries are $0 \leq x \leq 4$ and $0 \leq y \leq 5$. The point $(x_1+y_1n,y_2+nx_2)$ must satisfy these conditions.

1. For the x-coordinate, $0 \leq x_1 + y_1n \leq 4$.

2. For the y-coordinate, $0 \leq y_2 + nx_2 \leq 5$.

Since $x_1$, $y_1$, $x_2$, and $y_2$ are not given, we cannot directly solve for $n$. However, we can express the conditions in terms of $n$.

\[ \frac{-x_1}{y_1} \leq n \leq \frac{4-x_1}{y_1} \quad \text{and} \quad \frac{-y_2}{x_2} \leq n \leq \frac{5-y_2}{x_2} \]

For integer values of $n$, the range of $n$ would depend on the specific values of $x_1$, $y_1$, $x_2$, and $y_2$.

However, without specific values for $x_1$, $y_1$, $x_2$, and $y_2$, we cannot determine the exact range of $n$.

In the original solution, the values of $x_1$, $y_1$, $x_2$, and $y_2$ were assumed to be (1, 1) and (1, 2) respectively, but since they were not provided in the problem, the correct answer cannot be determined.

Given the format of the question, we can't provide a numerical answer without the values of $x_1$, $y_1$, $x_2$, and $y_2$.

In this case, I will provide an answer that indicates the problem cannot be solved as presented:
\[ \boxed{0} \]