Analyse the following write-up, establish the correctness of the architecture (methodology, mathematics, etc...).

LaTeX write-up:
```
\documentclass{article}

% set font encoding for PDFLaTeX, XeLaTeX, or LuaTeX
\usepackage{ifxetex,ifluatex}
\if\ifxetex T\else\ifluatex T\else F\fi\fi T%
  \usepackage{fontspec}
\else
  \usepackage[T1]{fontenc}
  \usepackage[utf8]{inputenc}
  \usepackage{lmodern}
\fi

\usepackage{hyperref}
\usepackage{amsmath}

\title{Write-up for Dan Fosing}
\author{Research Institute @ SprykAI}

% Enable SageTeX to run SageMath code right inside this LaTeX file.
% http://doc.sagemath.org/html/en/tutorial/sagetex.html
% \usepackage{sagetex}

% Enable PythonTeX to run Python – https://ctan.org/pkg/pythontex
% \usepackage{pythontex}

\begin{document}
\maketitle

\subsection{1. Introduction}

This document provides a description of a self-reflective and self-correcting architecture for a Transformer-based Language Model (LLM). The architecture is designed to mimic human-like revision processes by incorporating mechanisms that allow dynamic editing of previously generated tokens during text generation.

\subsection{2. Notation and Preliminary Definitions}

\subsubsection{Notation}

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($S = (s_1, s_2, \dots, s_T)$): Sequence of tokens generated by the model.
    \item ($h_t$): Hidden state corresponding to token ($s_t$) at time step ($t$).
    \item ($E_{\text{token}}(s)$): Embedding of token ($s$).
    \item ($E_{\text{pos}}(t)$): Positional embedding for position ($t$).
    \item ($E_{\text{task}}$): Task embedding representing the task or instruction.
    \item ($P(s_t | S_{<t})$): Probability of generating token ($s_t$) given previous sequence ($S_{<t}$).
    \item ($P_{\text{error}}(t)$): Probability that token ($s_t$) contains an error.
    \item ($Q(S)$): Quality score assigned to sequence ($S$) by the Judge Model.
    \item ($\pi(a_t | x_{\text{policy}})$): Probability of selecting action ($a_t$) given policy network input ($x_{\text{policy}}$).
    \item ($W$): Working Memory storing the current sequence and associated hidden states.
    \item ($\theta_{\text{error}}$): Threshold for error probability to consider a correction.
    \item ($A = \{ \text{Generate}, \text{Edit}, \text{Terminate} \}$): Set of possible actions.
    \item ($R$): Reward function used in reinforcement learning.
    \item ($L$): Number of layers in the Transformer model.
    \item ($d_{\text{model}}$): Dimensionality of the model.
    \item ($d_k$): Dimensionality of keys and queries in attention.
    \item ($H_{\text{judge}}$): Sequence representations computed by the Judge Model.
    \item ($\lambda_{\text{edit}}$): Penalty coefficient for edits in the reward function.
    \item ($E_{\text{max}}$): Maximum number of total edits allowed.
    \item ($e_{\text{count}}$): Counter for number of edits performed.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{Preliminary Definitions}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Sequence ($S$): The current sequence of tokens generated and possibly edited by the model.
    \item Hidden State ($h_t$): The internal representation at time ($t$) capturing context up to token ($s_t$).
    \item Working Memory ($W$): A data structure that stores the sequence ($S$) along with associated hidden states ($h_t$).
    \item Action ($a_t$): The action selected by the Policy Network at time ($t$), which can be to generate a new token, edit existing tokens, or terminate the sequence generation.
\end{itemize}

\subsection{3. Component Architectures}

\subsubsection{3.1 Generator Model (G)}

\paragraph{Function}
Generates the next token in the sequence based on the current context and task requirements.

\paragraph{Architecture Details}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Transformer Decoder-based Architecture:
    \item The Generator is implemented using a Transformer decoder composed of ($L$) layers.
    \item Each layer consists of:
    \item Masked Multi-Head Self-Attention
    \item Feedforward Neural Network (FFN)
    \item Layer Normalization and Residual Connections
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Input Representations}

At each time step ($t$), the input to the Generator is:

\[
X_t = E_{\text{token}}(s_{t-1}) + E_{\text{pos}}(t-1) + E_{\text{task}}
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($s_{t-1}$): The token generated at the previous time step. For ($t = 1$), ($s_0$) is a special start token.
    \item ($E_{\text{pos}}(t-1)$): Positional embedding for position ($t-1$).
    \item ($E_{\text{task}}$): Task embedding added to all time steps to represent global task context.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Decoder Layers}

For each layer ($l$) (from 1 to ($L$)), the computations are as follows:

\begin{enumerate}
    \item Masked Multi-Head Self-Attention
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Calculations for Each Head:
        \[
        Q^{(l)} = X^{(l-1)} W_Q^{(l)} \quad K^{(l)} = X^{(l-1)} W_K^{(l)} \quad V^{(l)} = X^{(l-1)} W_V^{(l)}
        \]
        \item Scaled Dot-Product Attention for Each Head:
        \[
        \text{Attention}(Q^{(l)}, K^{(l)}, V^{(l)}) = \text{softmax}\left( \frac{Q^{(l)} K^{(l) T}}{\sqrt{d_k}} + M \right) V^{(l)}
        \]
        \item ($M$): Mask matrix where ($M_{ij} = -\infty$) if ($i < j$) (future tokens are masked), zero otherwise.
        \item Concatenate All Heads:
        \[
        \text{MultiHead}(Q^{(l)}, K^{(l)}, V^{(l)}) = \text{Concat}(\text{head}_1, \dots, \text{head}_H) W_O^{(l)}
        \]
    \end{itemize}
    \item Add \& Norm (Residual Connection and Layer Normalization):
    \[
    Z^{(l)} = \text{LayerNorm}(X^{(l-1)} + \text{MultiHead}(Q^{(l)}, K^{(l)}, V^{(l)}))
    \]
    \item Feedforward Network (FFN):
    \[
    F^{(l)} = \text{ReLU}(Z^{(l)} W_1^{(l)} + b_1^{(l)}) W_2^{(l)} + b_2^{(l)}
    \]
    \item Add \& Norm (Residual Connection and Layer Normalization):
    \[
    X^{(l)} = \text{LayerNorm}(Z^{(l)} + F^{(l)})
    \]
\end{enumerate}

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($X^{(0)} = X_t$) (Input at layer 0).
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Output Layer}

The output probabilities over the vocabulary are computed using a linear layer followed by a softmax:

\[
P(s_t | S_{<t}) = \text{softmax}(X^{(L)} W_O + b_O)
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($X^{(L)}$): Output from the last decoder layer.
    \item ($W_O$), ($b_O$): Output projection parameters.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{3.2 Error Detection Module (EDM)}

\paragraph{Function}
Identifies token-level errors in the generated sequence ($S$) by predicting the probability that each token ($s_t$) contains an error.

\paragraph{Architecture Details}

\begin{itemize}
    \item The EDM is integrated with the Generator's decoder layers.
    \item It uses the hidden states ($h_t = X^{(L)}$) from the Generator.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Error Probability Computation}

For each token ($s_t$):

\[
P_{\text{error}}(t) = \sigma(W_{\text{edm}} h_t + b_{\text{edm}})
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($W_{\text{edm}}$), ($b_{\text{edm}}$): Parameters of the EDM.
    \item ($\sigma$): Sigmoid activation function.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{3.3 Judge Model (J)}

\paragraph{Function}
Evaluates the overall quality and correctness of the generated sequence ($S$).

\paragraph{Architecture Details}

\begin{itemize}
    \item The Judge Model is implemented as a Transformer encoder or a feedforward neural network.
    \item It processes the entire sequence ($S$) to produce a quality score ($Q(S)$).
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Input to the Judge}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Sequence Embeddings:
    \[
    S_{\text{embed}} = E_{\text{token}}(S) + E_{\text{pos}} + E_{\text{task}}
    \]
    \item Processing:
    \[
    H_{\text{judge}} = \text{Encoder}(S_{\text{embed}})
    \]
    \item Aggregation into a Single Representation:
    \[
    h_{\text{judge}} = \text{Aggregate}(H_{\text{judge}})
    \]
    \item Aggregation can be performed using mean pooling, max pooling, or attention-based pooling.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Quality Score Computation}

\[
Q(S) = \sigma(W_j h_{\text{judge}} + b_j)
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($W_j$), ($b_j$): Parameters of the Judge Model.
    \item ($\sigma$): Sigmoid activation function.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{3.4 Working Memory (WM)}

\paragraph{Function}
Stores the current sequence ($S$) and allows for dynamic editing (insertions, deletions, replacements) with efficient access and updates.

\paragraph{Data Structure}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Rope Data Structure: A tree-like data structure optimized for efficient string operations, particularly insertions and deletions.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Representation}

\[
W = \{ (s_1, h_1), (s_2, h_2), \dots, (s_T, h_T) \}
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($s_t$): Token at position ($t$).
    \item ($h_t$): Corresponding hidden state from the Generator.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{3.5 Policy Network (PN)}

\paragraph{Function}
Decides the next action to take (Generate, Edit, Terminate) based on inputs from the Generator, EDM, Judge Model, and current state.

\paragraph{Architecture Details}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Implemented as a feedforward neural network with hidden layers and an output layer producing action probabilities.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Input to the Policy Network}

\begin{itemize}
    \item State Vector ($x_{\text{policy}}$):
    \[
    x_{\text{policy}} = [h_t; P_{\text{error}}(t); Q(S); e_{\text{count}}; \text{other context}]
    \]
    \item ($h_t$): Current hidden state.
    \item ($P_{\text{error}}(t)$): Error probability of current token.
    \item ($Q(S)$): Current quality score.
    \item ($e_{\text{count}}$): Number of edits performed so far.
    \item Other context may include positional information, length of the sequence, etc.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Action Probability Distribution}

\[
\pi(a_t | x_{\text{policy}}) = \text{softmax}(W_{\text{pn}} x_{\text{policy}} + b_{\text{pn}})
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($W_{\text{pn}}$), ($b_{\text{pn}}$): Parameters of the Policy Network.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{3.6 Action Modules (AM)}

\paragraph{Function}
Executes actions selected by the Policy Network, including generating new tokens, editing existing tokens, or terminating the sequence generation.

\paragraph{Actions and Execution}

\begin{enumerate}
    \item Generate Action
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Process:
        \item Generate the next token ($s_{T+1}$) using the Generator's output probabilities.
        \item Update Working Memory ($W$) by appending (($s_{T+1}, h_{T+1}$)).
    \end{itemize}
    \item Edit Action
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Process:
        \item Identify tokens with ($P_{\text{error}}(t) \geq \theta_{\text{error}}$).
        \item Decide on the type of edit (insert, delete, replace) based on an edit strategy.
        \item Perform the edit on ($W$).
        \item Recompute hidden states ($h_t$) for affected positions.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Terminate Action
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Process:
        \item Finalize the output sequence ($S$) from the current state of Working Memory ($W$).
        \item End the generation process.
    \end{itemize}
\end{enumerate}

\subsection{4. Data Flow and Operational Mechanisms}

\subsubsection{Sequence of Operations}

\begin{enumerate}
    \item Initialization:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Input prompt and task embeddings are processed.
        \item The Generator is initialized to start sequence generation.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Token Generation:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item At time ($t$), the Generator produces token ($s_t$) and hidden state ($h_t$).
        \item These are based on inputs ($X_t$) that include the previous token, positional encoding, and task embedding.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Error Detection:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item The EDM computes ($P_{\text{error}}(t)$) using ($h_t$).
        \item Tokens with ($P_{\text{error}}(t) \geq \theta_{\text{error}}$) are flagged.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Working Memory Update:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item The new token ($s_t$) and ($h_t$) are added to ($W$).
    \end{itemize}
    \item Quality Evaluation:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item The Judge Model computes ($Q(S)$) for the current sequence ($S$) in ($W$).
    \end{itemize}
    \item Policy Decision:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item The Policy Network receives ($x_{\text{policy}}$) and computes ($\pi(a_t | x_{\text{policy}})$).
        \item An action ($a_t$) is selected (e.g., Generate, Edit, Terminate).
    \end{itemize}
    \item Action Execution:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item The selected action is executed by the corresponding module in AM.
        \item For edits, ($e_{\text{count}}$) is incremented, and hidden states are recomputed for affected positions.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Loop Continuation:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item If the action is not Terminate, increment ($t$) and repeat steps 2-7.
        \item The process continues until the Terminate action is selected.
    \end{itemize}
\end{enumerate}

\subsubsection{Data Dependencies and Interactions}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Generator and EDM: The EDM uses ($h_t$) from the Generator to compute error probabilities.
    \item Working Memory: Stores ($s_t$) and ($h_t$), accessible by the Judge Model, Policy Network, and Action Modules.
    \item Judge Model: Evaluates ($S$) from ($W$) and provides ($Q(S)$) to the Policy Network.
    \item Policy Network: Uses inputs from the EDM, Judge Model, and current state to decide the next action.
    \item Action Modules: Update ($W$) and the model's state based on the selected action.
\end{itemize}

\subsection{5. Mathematical Formulations}

\subsubsection{5.1 Loss Functions}

\paragraph{Generator Loss (($\mathcal{L}_{\text{gen}}$))}

The standard cross-entropy loss between the predicted token probabilities and the target tokens:

\[
\mathcal{L}_{\text{gen}} = - \sum_{t} \log P(s_t^{\text{target}} | S_{<t})
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($s_t^{\text{target}}$): Ground truth token at position ($t$).
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Error Detection Loss (($\mathcal{L}_{\text{edm}}$))}

The binary cross-entropy loss for error detection:

\[
\mathcal{L}_{\text{edm}} = - \sum_{t} \left[ y_t \log P_{\text{error}}(t) + (1 - y_t) \log (1 - P_{\text{error}}(t)) \right]
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($y_t$): Ground truth label indicating whether token ($s_t$) contains an error (1 for error, 0 for no error).
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Judge Loss (($\mathcal{L}_{\text{judge}}$))}

The loss for evaluating the quality score:

\[
\mathcal{L}_{\text{judge}} = - \left[ y \log Q(S) + (1 - y) \log (1 - Q(S)) \right]
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($y$): Ground truth label indicating whether the sequence ($S$) is correct (1) or contains errors (0).
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Policy Loss (($\mathcal{L}_{\text{policy}}$))}

Using a reinforcement learning framework with policy gradient methods:

\[
\mathcal{L}_{\text{policy}} = - \mathbb{E}_{a_t \sim \pi} \left[ R \log \pi(a_t | x_{\text{policy}}) \right]
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($R$): Reward function based on the quality of the sequence and penalties for edits.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Combined Loss Function}

The total loss combines the individual losses with weighting factors:

\[
\mathcal{L} = \lambda_{\text{gen}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{gen}} + \lambda_{\text{edm}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{edm}} + \lambda_{\text{judge}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{judge}} + \lambda_{\text{policy}} \mathcal{L}_{\text{policy}}
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($\lambda_{\text{gen}}$), ($\lambda_{\text{edm}}$), ($\lambda_{\text{judge}}$), ($\lambda_{\text{policy}}$): Loss weighting factors.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{5.2 Reinforcement Learning Framework}

\paragraph{Reward Function (($R$))}

A reward function that encourages high-quality sequences while penalizing excessive edits:

\[
R = Q(S) - \lambda_{\text{edit}} e_{\text{count}}
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($Q(S)$): Quality score from the Judge Model.
    \item ($\lambda_{\text{edit}}$): Penalty coefficient for edits.
    \item ($e_{\text{count}}$): Total number of edits performed.
\end{itemize}

\paragraph{Policy Optimization}

Using policy gradient methods to update the Policy Network parameters:

\[
\nabla_{\theta_{\text{pn}}} \mathbb{E}_{a_t \sim \pi} [R] = \mathbb{E}_{a_t \sim \pi} [R \nabla_{\theta_{\text{pn}}} \log \pi(a_t | x_{\text{policy}})]
\]

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($\theta_{\text{pn}}$): Parameters of the Policy Network.
\end{itemize}

\subsection{6. Training Methodologies}

\subsubsection{6.1 Pre-Training}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Pre-train the Generator on a large corpus using the language modeling objective (($\mathcal{L}_{\text{gen}}$)).
    \item Pre-train the Judge Model and EDM on datasets with known errors to learn quality evaluation and error detection.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{6.2 Synthetic Data Generation}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Generate synthetic data by introducing controlled errors into sequences.
    \item Types of errors include:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Random token substitutions, deletions, insertions.
        \item Logical inconsistencies.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Use this data to train the EDM and Judge Model.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{6.3 Joint Fine-Tuning}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Fine-tune all components together using the combined loss function ($\mathcal{L}$).
    \item Ensure balanced training by adjusting the loss weighting factors.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{6.4 Reinforcement Learning with Imitation Learning}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Imitation Learning:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Initialize the Policy Network by training it to imitate an expert policy using supervised learning.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Reinforcement Learning:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Fine-tune the Policy Network using the reward function ($R$) and policy gradient methods.
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}

\subsection{7. Implementation Details}

\subsubsection{7.1 Data Structures}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Working Memory (WM):
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Implemented using a Rope data structure for efficient insertions and deletions.
        \item Edit History Tracking:
        \item Maintain a record of edits per token to enforce per-token edit limits.
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{7.2 Computational Considerations}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Hidden State Recomputations:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Efficiently recompute hidden states only for affected positions after edits.
        \item Cache computations where possible to avoid redundant calculations.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Parallel Processing:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Utilize parallel computation for recomputing hidden states of multiple tokens simultaneously.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Memory Management:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Optimize memory usage by discarding unnecessary cached states.
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}

\subsection{8. Hyperparameter Tuning and Threshold Settings}

\subsubsection{Key Hyperparameters}

\begin{itemize}
    \item ($\theta_{\text{error}}$): Error probability threshold for initiating edits (e.g., between 0.5 and 0.9).
    \item ($\lambda_{\text{edit}}$): Penalty coefficient for edits in the reward function.
    \item ($E_{\text{max}}$): Maximum number of total edits allowed.
    \item ($\lambda_{\text{gen}}$), ($\lambda_{\text{edm}}$), ($\lambda_{\text{judge}}$), ($\lambda_{\text{policy}}$): Loss weighting factors.
    \item Learning rates for different components.
\end{itemize}

\subsubsection{Tuning Strategies}

\begin{itemize}
    \item Grid Search:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Systematically explore combinations of hyperparameters to find optimal settings.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Adaptive Tuning:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Adjust hyperparameters dynamically during training based on performance metrics.
    \end{itemize}
    \item Cross-Validation:
    \begin{itemize}
        \item Validate hyperparameter settings on separate datasets to ensure generalization.
    \end{itemize}
\end{itemize}

\subsection{9. Conclusion}

The self-reflective and self-correcting architecture detailed in this document provides a comprehensive framework for building Transformer-based Language Models capable of dynamically editing and improving their outputs during generation. By integrating components such as the Generator, Error Detection Module, Judge Model, Policy Network, Working Memory, and Action Modules, the model can autonomously refine its outputs without external inputs.

The low-level details, mathematical formulations, and implementation considerations outlined herein serve as a guide for researchers and practitioners aiming to implement and further develop such architectures. The focus on component interactions, data flows, and training methodologies ensures that the model operates efficiently and effectively, mimicking human-like revision processes in text generation.

\subsection{10. References}

\begin{enumerate}
    \item Vaswani, A., et al. (2017). "Attention is All You Need." Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
    \item Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (2018). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. MIT Press.
    \item Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep Learning. MIT Press.
\end{enumerate}

\end{document}
```