System: You are a professional Data QA Specialist.
User: You are extracting QAs from a conversation transciption between an interviewer and group of interviews but the conversation is mo separated,
Please separte all the interviewer questions and refer to it using M: and the interviews answers using R:


# Example: 
- Input:
“She is starting to ask questions so tell me what do you like from this concept? Uhm, ah look it is very affordable and will be easy to carry for me I like the fact that it is easy“

- QA format:
“M: She is starting to ask questions so tell me what do you like from this concept?
R: Uhm, ah look it is very affordable and will be easy to carry
R: for me I like the fact that it is easy“


# Guidelines
- Don't summarize the transciption just split it into QAs as provided without any modifications.
- Answer using the required format without removing, dropping any of the provided transciption at all and do not drop even a single word from the first to the last word.


Here is the provided transciption:
 250 grams, it should be a lot more. It is less. It is a lot less. It is lower. The price is much lower. It used to be more expensive. The previous one, it is 240,000 riyals, the S gold. You don't doubt it. Samone doesn't doubt it either. What about the others? Don't talk together. Do you doubt it? I doubt it. Elmira says it is not believable Mariam says I doubt it I doubt it to the price but two people Mariam and Samone they say because we are certain about Laudan we are not doubted we don't get doubtful but a company so big why can't they do that ok 3 million now it is that price it is a shock it is surprising you doubt that a company that big wouldn't do that they either reduce the price ok so yeah they don't want to have yeah because they don't get any interest of that it is bad for them because one this is less than a half five kilo they didn't understand this two people said with this price we have no problem because we trust laudan they said because we trust laudan the price is good because we know laudan is trustworthy Undoubtedly, we buy that. But four people said we doubt it because the price is very low. And they are explaining that why is that so. Four people say they are doubtful. Two people say they don't doubt. Why? Because Laudan either. They have to go through the, for example, if they produce this and give it to the market, they don't receive any interest. It's not beneficial for them. One kilo is less than 17,000. 172,000 is four of that. It is 680,000 real for a kilo. So I think the price is less than five kilo. Okay? It is a lot less than a five kilo chain. Okay? So, it is 250 grams. Four of that is one kilo. It is about 6,800 thousand. One kilo is 6,800 thousand. so it is 5 kilo ok it is a lot more no it is not right the way they calculate so in calculation they made a mistake I thought it is less than 5 kilo if it is so that the price is the same I accept that I would buy that do you all have the same problem I thought the price is a lot lower than the price of that. No, but I notice now that the price, no, it is not doubted. I'm not doubtful anymore. So, yeah, all of them, they are not doubtful. Why this price made you so doubtful? Because in the supermarket you cannot find anything which is $172,000. Not even the chewing gum, okay? it is such a low price and then the iron 450 gram for Lodan Blue is 310 thousand what do you think I buy that, we buy that I agree, I like it yeah, is it good, 310 thousand for 450, do you like it Do you buy that? Yes. Because it's still... No. You consider the price of it itself. $310,000 for 450 grams of Lodan Blue. How do you calculate it? If you don't consider the calculation, If you consider that, this is the price. How would you do that? 31, when you say 310,000, it is okay. But when you do the calculation, 310 is suitable for 450,000, yes. All six people, there are six people. All six people say it is good. The relationship of this is relatively to the other goods, it is very good. Whatever we want to buy, it is 50,000, 500,000 riyals. Now I write the price there, gold. She's writing the price on the board. Okay, the price is 200. And Ladan Blue. amongst these four if you want to choose one of them among these four which one would you choose? I would use 450 grams Zohre, which one? Gold I, gold I tell the names they don't tell the names four people gold I Samane, Zohre, Zahra and Maryam And two people, I, Ladan, Blue Elmira and Maryam Why? The four people that are I, Gold Zahra I, Gold I think the quality is better As I have heard I have not used it much I think the quality what do you mean by the quality the color is acceptable it's pleasant it is thicker the texture is bigger better and the one kilo that I bought I prefer I pay ten hundred thousand extra for better hundred thousand when you say this is uhre When they say gold, so it is something special about it, that in that size, in that packaging, in that size and packaging, the price is more. there is something peculiar about it that is why because previously I bought one kilo mariam ladang gold and I prefer that because samane because ladang gold because I've been using it for long and there's more saffron in it and I I gold I because it is heavier because it is more economical, the used eye. And the two eyes for Ladan Blue, El Mira, because I have used Ladan Blue for longer, so for me, Ladan Blue is more acceptable than Ladan Gold. It is thicker, it is thicker, and I prefer that. So, have you ever used Ladan Gold? No, it doesn't have any problem. I like the texture of ladan blue better because it is thicker. Yeah, only because it is thicker. Even it is thicker and it is consistent. Why? There are things that Elmira said. Laudan gold, Laudan blue, the color is brighter, it is too yellowish Laudan gold, and I don't like it to be too yellowish, Laudan blue is lighter, I think Laudan in comparison with the others are more yellowish, but Laudan gold is very yellow, I don't like that. Janna, which idea should we go first? Which idea should we go first? E. I want to read a concept about the package in E. She's going through E. Concept E Okay The brand is Lodan Blue and Lodan Gold Rich Ghee in affordable sizes That are perfectly Portioned for your need Okay and she gives the price For that I read it while She reads it a second time. What do you think about this concept? What do you think about it? This is, yeah, concept E, as you asked. It says Ghee, but what we saw, it is semi-solid. Okay, it is not, yeah, this is doubtful it's a question this is solid or semi-solid it is semi-solid how many of you say all of them all of them they say it is semi-solid but it is not solid when he says that it is a it It is the gi, it is not a gi, it is a, it is a semi-solid. Okay, what other thing about the sentences? Yeah, about this concept, do you like this concept? Okay, yeah, it is, yeah, what do you mean? They are, it is repetition. Yeah, it is the taste and, yeah, it is rich, it is the, yeah, between taste and, I would use, do you prefer the, okay, it is, it can be the taste and the, okay, the smell. okay, what is yeah, okay the smell is good for the perfume, okay we cannot use that they are talking about they better bring up the what is it that you don't like one of them is that it is not it should be semi in the Farsi it is solid, it should be semi-solid, and it is the taste and the, yeah, it is the same, so right here, they are discussing that, and the others disagree with the taste, yeah, they say it is for the perfume and flowers, and the size, the size and the way, they are the same, you can use only one of them okay i made a mistake okay it is the size and the weight okay it is the it is the weight okay the size and the weight are two different there are two different words what do you like about it what do you dislike yeah is it good to try do they say try that Zahra it is what I want I really think I should try I'm always ready to try something I'm always ready to try something if I use it once and then you use it continuously you use it once yeah it is try it the feeling of giving it is good for me because she said I always go and try it once this trying something is good is a good feeling what else okay what about the yeah they say that it can be the smell okay is it good it could be the taste and the smell Okay? Yeah, it doesn't have the smell. So the food that you eat with, when you make it with the ghee, it has a favorable smell that you want to only use that. So it doesn't have any smell. it doesn't have any smell itself this concept is it the pouch that you is it suitable for the pouch that they saw and the E concept E is it good for the pouch or not ok is it relevant to the pouch which one which part of this is suitable for the pouch is the size and the price. The packaging doesn't have anything to do with this concept. It doesn't need it to talk in favor of that. That it has... Laudan doesn't need that. If they say that, is it good or not good? Bring up your opinion. For example, something that is emphasized. I think there's something wrong with it. For example, Laudan, they have a new idea and it's a reasonable price affordable price ok now what does it say now try it what is emphasized it's talking about itself because it says it is a taste that is ok when it says it's the rich gay the people who have used it we know the taste of that what is the difference what is the now people who have not used it they can go for it. It is like yeah when you say something that even if so many people don't like it and how many of you think that is exaggerating. I think Lord Anne Brand doesn't need that for such concept. We can agree that we deleted four people. They say Laudan is prominent, is well known, shouldn't talk in favor of itself. Okay? The gi, the rich gi, okay? I think the solid, the gi should be the semi-solid gi. And then they can say that Laudan is in the market with a new design, with a new, okay, the half-solid ghee, the Ladan half-solid ghee is bringing a new creativity with a new package, with the new pouches, and for everybody for everybody and in every situation okay yeah so I'm saying the colloquial form so please say that if you agree or you don't take me Elmira says that it is a new packaging a new design but with a suitable affordable price why does it say it is it is with the same with the same quality they can say with the same quality and the previous smell but in new packs for the for using it in all situations and conditions and that which can be affordable. Do you agree? If they take that it is instead of Binazir which is the Gi, rich Gi, okay it can be old Gi and the size and the weight suitable for you is good okay, the sizes that are to be, they are perfectly portioned for you. Now the color was good. The color of that, the package, the pouches. We are talking about the pouches. Are there any characteristics about the pouch that you want to bring up here? It has to be. You don't, if you don't finish, I mean, the more ideas you give, you said it. I said that the packaging should be noted, that the packaging is new, okay? Okay, what was good about the pouches? Because we had problems with the pouches, it was not easily poured. We had problems. And so the next concept is, I want you to the next concept. We want your opinion more on the other one. The new V, she's reading V. The new pouches from the brand Laudan offer the same rich taste in a convenient pack for easier use in the kitchen, just enough for three to four servings or cooks okay and then she mentions the price lord and gold okay okay available what do you think about this V concept it is not a easily for easier use, okay? And it is only for the kitchen, but it is not only for the kitchen, that we don't use it only for the kitchen. I personally, I take it for a picnic or when I travel, I don't use it at home, in the kitchen. I don't use it. How many of you, they use it for trip when they are on the travel. So kitchen should be deleted. And it is not packed for easier use. A convenient pack is okay. But for easier use, yes. It is not easy to use it. And we can keep a convenient pack. In the kitchen, it should be deleted. But I said, sometimes I don't have $3 million to buy a 5 kilo, and I go for a cheaper one, a smaller one. I buy the smaller packs, so it is possible that in a student or somebody who doesn't have money or somebody who is alone, think about this concept. Do you think it is good or bad? In the kitchen, how many of you say it should be in the kitchen? Zoe says it shouldn't be. How many of you think it shouldn't be in the kitchen? Three. For the easier use, so daily use. Why don't they say for a daily use instead of an easier use? Daily use. for three or four servings okay they shouldn't mention it they shouldn't give a number maybe I choose it for one meal a number of people is higher it is not three or four meals how many people did they consider so this is not there this should not be mentioned. So three to four servings is not interesting. And it's not easier to use. Okay? The use is not easy. Yeah, we can easy, we can say it can carry it easily. We can say for, yeah, for carrying it, it can be easy. But opening it for easier use is not correct I want to go I want to go on a picnic and then I have to have scissors or knife on me I have to keep it with knife so that I cut it well so it is very yeah this thing that's always said yeah it has to have a opening or a ziplock so that you can close it you can open it and close it again and one other thing or there should be a there should be something like this sauce that you can open it easily what else what else do you like other than that it is perfect yeah it is much better than the other one it is much better than the e why yeah it is a yeah well I'm sorry I'm sorry it says the same rich taste okay the same rich taste is good it says that the same rich taste is good okay now why doesn't it say it put emphasis on that it is something new it is something new they like it they like the same rich taste and they say the new pouches they don't mention the ghee okay they don't mention that whether it is a semi-solid or a solid so it says the new pouches so they say that that is it but here it's a new pouches you open it you use it it is something that I'm using it and yeah do you agree with that what else should be Did you like the same rich taste? Yes. Which one of them? Okay. It is, yeah, it is the old one, the previous one. The same means the previous one. Is it more suitable for Laudan Gold or Laudan Blue? The brand, Laudan brand. Is it relevant to Laudan? Is it relevant to Laudan Blue? If it is like the past, yes. So, for example, because I use Laudan Blue, yes, I say it is pleasant. So, is it more relevant to Laudan? How many of you say it is Laudan Blue? I would say both of them It is Ladan Blue No, it was first Ladan Blue and then Ladan Gold I say both of them I say it is relevant to both of them Ladan Gold and Ladan Blue It is relevant to both of them It is addressing both of them Zahra says both of them Elmira, it doesn't matter two Mariams is good and Samane as well okay should I compare them if we have a pack a different pack for one's usage what do you think about that what do you think about the pack that is for once usage you use it only once how should it be tell me it is ok because we open it and we use it once it can be easily emptied with hand I can spill it out easily they talk together ok how much should it weigh It depends. If I have guests, one meal, okay, for one meal, okay? 250 grams. No, it should be less. 250 grams is not for one use. yeah Elmira says 250 grams is for one suze for one my one suze 200 grams 200 grams oh one rice and one stew Zohreh 100 grams for only rice Maryam 100 grams for rice how many five people Mariam 100 rice four people 150 grams for a stew and a rice yeah it is for six people 450 yeah is it good or bad the pack for one usage within this size is it good or bad Do you like it? How many people like it? It should be even less than that. How many like it? One, two, three, four, five people like it. For the pouch that you can use once. This idea, do you like this idea or not? For once usage. where don't talk about the size this concept this concept, do you like it for one's usage don't mention the size ok, they don't understand ok, concept V if you want to talk about the one's usage of the concept V is it good yeah, it is the it is the convenient pack easier use in the kitchen okay, three or four if it is smaller you can you can have the pack yeah, you can have the same rich taste okay, you can feel the same rich taste it is there in the once you said you can see that in the food you can notice the good taste of that if it is in the food they don't understand what they are saying either they talk together now please did you like this concept yes very much regardless of their size how many people liked it they are giggling they are laughing they are talking. The previous one had a lot of problems because between the pouches, that is once usage and 450 grams. This is, if it is 450 grams or this that it is once usage, How many of you use the 450 grams, the 450 grams and the one's usage? I prefer the 450 grams and nothing is left in that. But 450 grams, at least there is 450 grams of ghee. What do you think? Yeah, Zahra said something interesting. Yeah, it is, yeah, there's a lot of ghee wasted in that one's usage pack. But the volume, the size should be clear. What is, you said about 200 grams. For what's usage? I said 100 grams. 400 grams or 450 grams yeah yeah the question that you ask it depends on where to use it how to use it now for example I have a pouch which is 450 grams and one that it is once usage which one now we are talking about the size. Once usage. No, I go for the 450 grams. 450 grams. All of the 450 grams. Because it is more, it is more affordable and you don't waste it. If it is once usage, you waste a lot of that, okay? Anything else that you choose 450? Shall we compare them? Shall we compare their concepts? Okay, are we going to compare the concepts? Why do they say? Why do they say that in a once usage it is wasted? Because once usage, because it is small, it is small and you want to use it once for three or four people. So it is very little, the weight is less, it weighs less. So that much of that will remain in the pack. But you empty that i said very from the beginning i said you cannot empty it very well you put it next to the dish you put it next next to the heat to melt it but this one you cannot do it with the tea you put it next to the heat and you melt it but from the very beginning we had this problem with it. Okay, how should the size of that be? Okay, so what can we do so that it doesn't for one's usage? Is it the same size that you made it smaller? It is like it. It is the sauce that are for a single person. It is a little thicker and longer, wider and longer. Yeah, I think we have the single sauce, half of this is inside it. Okay? The single sausage. So it is not completely emptied. So that 450 grams is more economical. Because Yes, a source. One at a time. Ask them. One weight. Is for the, what is the way that you, okay, what weight? Yes, again. Yes, I have written it here. For the single one. For the single one. Okay. For the single usage. What should the weight for the single usage be? Yes, we asked it and they answered. They said 100 grams. Zohre, 100 grams for rice. Zahra, rice, 200 grams for rice and stew. Yeah. For rice and stew, 250 grams Elmira. Okay? Rice and stew, 200 grams Mariam. Mariam, 100 rice, 150 samane, 150 for rice and stew. It is only rice, some of them only rice, some of them rice and stew. And the sizes are different. The 100 grams, should we go for the comparison of the concepts? The packs, huh? You all said V. You prefer V. All of them, they said that the concept V, they accept it better, okay? They go for the concept V. What do you think about this packaging? All of you should give an idea. What do you think? We have it at home. How many of you use it? I have it at home. All of them. All of them, they have it at home. it is the packaging we don't think about the brand just this package what do you think about it it is heavy it is heavy


[Answer without any pre/post text.]
Assistant: