0:0:0.0 --> 0:0:1.790
Jasmine Tang
Fit in those in for like like you.
0:0:1.100 --> 0:0:2.130
SueAnn See
When you smiling.
0:0:5.750 --> 0:0:5.910
Jasmine Tang
No.
0:0:7.920 --> 0:0:8.950
Jasmine Tang
For example, we see.
0:0:9.340 --> 0:0:12.20
Jasmine Tang
Let's say we need to clean it external IDP right?
0:0:12.710 --> 0:0:26.640
Jasmine Tang
Then you might have an API, but then you you you want you want to have a UI for, let's say, cops, whoever they onboarding the customer to configure the information for the customers, external IT information.
0:0:26.890 --> 0:0:37.630
Jasmine Tang
OK, so this part UI is is is the one that same as external authentication configuration like like the one that we have in IHOME.
0:0:37.640 --> 0:0:42.680
Jasmine Tang
If you get the area I I don't know exactly how that looks like, but then it's the UI.
0:0:43.20 --> 0:0:48.290
Jasmine Tang
Tell us to configure external identity provider, not only external IDP that whatever the unique they say.
0:0:50.890 --> 0:0:55.380
Jasmine Tang
If you like, do we have the scope of that that being outlined by Duraid on this area?
0:0:55.470 --> 0:1:9.300
Jasmine Tang
I don't see because I don't know what it's gonna, but he just mentioned before, you know, in all the summer integration discussions, he always said that platform should have UI to do all those configuration.
0:1:10.550 --> 0:1:14.540
Jasmine Tang
OK, I think this time maybe we need to follow with.
0:1:15.240 --> 0:1:15.590
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, sorry.
0:1:13.880 --> 0:1:24.210
Eric Wong
Uh, I have a question this you I is it just slowly gonna be used by cloudops or is it gonna be used by in a tenant level?
0:1:24.640 --> 0:1:25.320
Eric Wong
I think the previous.
0:1:31.430 --> 0:1:32.50
Jasmine Tang
Eric lost you.
0:1:34.780 --> 0:1:34.900
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:1:33.90 --> 0:1:35.500
Eric Wong
For can you hear me? Hello.
0:1:36.450 --> 0:1:37.170
Jasmine Tang
Yeah. OK.
0:1:36.970 --> 0:1:37.380
Eric Wong
That.
0:1:38.130 --> 0:1:38.740
Eric Wong
Yep.
0:1:38.810 --> 0:1:49.250
Eric Wong
So I think previous one that we had is on the tenant level, if I remember correctly meaning to say it's more towards on the specific tenant.
0:1:49.430 --> 0:2:4.310
Eric Wong
So in this case, when cloud OPS has been mentioned right, am I supposed to think that this is something like access grant in a way that is only exists in the initial tenant where you can actually access multiple tenant to do the configuration?
0:2:8.80 --> 0:2:9.430
Eric Wong
It's a question. Thanks.
0:2:12.70 --> 0:2:15.720
Jasmine Tang
I also don't know, but it's, yeah, double confirm, yes.
0:2:19.710 --> 0:2:20.60
Eric Wong
Right.
0:2:20.70 --> 0:2:20.530
Eric Wong
OK. Thanks.
0:2:24.370 --> 0:2:26.240
Jasmine Tang
So why put on the action item?
0:2:26.250 --> 0:2:36.630
Jasmine Tang
So on the UI scope, being the bigger conversation between Keith ME and Duraid, right, so I will move to the next one.
0:2:36.640 --> 0:2:38.540
Jasmine Tang
The create user pool.
0:2:38.690 --> 0:2:44.410
Jasmine Tang
Sorry, I can user pool, I've forgotten to change in off 0 is not not call user pool.
0:2:45.640 --> 0:2:52.250
Jasmine Tang
So uh, if I think of 0 is not not reliable, we don't have a user pool here.
0:2:54.530 --> 0:2:55.940
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, this one works for Colorado.
0:2:56.780 --> 0:3:0.360
Jasmine Tang
Hopefully you'll be disregarded. OK.
0:3:8.830 --> 0:3:9.200
Jasmine Tang
And then.
0:3:14.250 --> 0:3:19.540
Jasmine Tang
The external IDP still valid for both Ooi DC and Samuel.
0:3:27.220 --> 0:3:30.180
Jasmine Tang
Ohh, I'd season media really support for this.
0:3:31.580 --> 0:3:32.280
Jasmine Tang
Open the phone signal.
0:3:34.110 --> 0:3:46.20
Jasmine Tang
I found now is like calling Keycloak API to create a external IDP so KEYCODE has is on API format and then all zero work is is totally different API.
0:3:46.110 --> 0:3:47.40
Jasmine Tang
So we need to change that.
0:3:47.140 --> 0:3:49.490
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, the peanut.
0:3:49.540 --> 0:3:52.790
Jasmine Tang
All these also different because it's two different provider.
0:3:57.900 --> 0:4:5.980
Jasmine Tang
And so this is your in a way is to support the SNR IDP for ODC SL, right?
0:4:6.40 --> 0:4:9.720
Jasmine Tang
But if we respect to all zero, OK and then.
0:4:11.490 --> 0:4:14.820
Jasmine Tang
Ohh, about the UI that mentioned here.
0:4:15.580 --> 0:4:17.100
Jasmine Tang
I think it's the same UI.
0:4:17.110 --> 0:4:17.790
Jasmine Tang
It's said.
0:4:17.830 --> 0:4:18.280
Jasmine Tang
Thank you.
0:4:18.290 --> 0:4:20.190
Jasmine Tang
I bigger scope UI is like.
0:4:22.580 --> 0:4:24.880
Jasmine Tang
Targeting creation of external IDP.
0:4:25.330 --> 0:4:25.730
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:4:25.780 --> 0:4:26.390
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:4:26.400 --> 0:4:29.320
Jasmine Tang
Again, I didn't modify this partner.
0:4:29.560 --> 0:4:30.650
Jasmine Tang
It's either you use.
0:4:31.100 --> 0:4:37.660
Jasmine Tang
There is an option to use SDK or API when you come to this partner I I suggest we use AP.
0:4:37.670 --> 0:4:43.20
Jasmine Tang
I don't use APK last time we suggest to use SDK because it was for committal.
0:4:43.30 --> 0:4:50.500
Jasmine Tang
So Cognito is using Amazon SDK and I checked with Eric that in platform service already using Amazon SDK.
0:4:50.510 --> 0:5:8.830
Jasmine Tang
So I think it's makes sense to continue using SDK lab, but if we switch to off 0 right, if we want to use their SDK that means you go to import more libraries then you go to cater for like if there is any patch purely for screen state, no feature change you still need to do the patching in your SDK.
0:5:9.40 --> 0:5:15.940
Jasmine Tang
So I think if you use API then you got less problem on those kind of patching without feature change.
0:5:19.10 --> 0:5:30.70
Eric Wong
Yeah, I think I think at the moment we don't use SDK or on keycloak, but we use only SDK for mainly for Route 53 and stuff yeah.
0:5:31.180 --> 0:5:31.370
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:5:31.380 --> 0:5:31.610
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:5:36.730 --> 0:5:37.20
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:5:39.450 --> 0:5:39.830
Eric Wong
Right.
0:5:31.620 --> 0:5:40.150
Jasmine Tang
So Wendy, if we switch to of 0 and then I suggest we don't use their SDK, but we use a API. Ohh.
0:5:39.870 --> 0:5:52.70
Eric Wong
OK, so so the way I look at it is just a another additional layer of all zero provider implementation that we can plug into actually call necessary API.
0:5:52.80 --> 0:5:53.250
Eric Wong
We've, uh, proper.
0:5:53.260 --> 0:5:54.120
Eric Wong
Whatever payload.
0:5:57.260 --> 0:5:57.440
Jasmine Tang
It's.
0:5:54.860 --> 0:5:59.180
Eric Wong
Similarly, how we implement for key code, but it's basically for all zero then OK.
0:5:59.290 --> 0:6:0.160
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I will.
0:6:0.170 --> 0:6:4.510
Jasmine Tang
I will call you platform ready, written in the interface class ready. Right.
0:6:4.850 --> 0:6:5.10
Eric Wong
Yes.
0:6:5.840 --> 0:6:6.100
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:6:6.110 --> 0:6:8.700
Jasmine Tang
Then then, then it just email maybe.
0:6:6.910 --> 0:6:12.430
Eric Wong
Yes, but just, uh, just a a just a.
0:6:14.200 --> 0:6:22.70
Eric Wong
Claudia is although we have the interface, it might not be 100%, so we have to see what required, yeah.
0:6:24.140 --> 0:6:31.850
Jasmine Tang
Ohh I think because I don't expect us to change another provider anymore in the future.
0:6:31.860 --> 0:6:38.530
Jasmine Tang
So, but it's good to make sure we rule the code in the way that it is fully loosely coupled.
0:6:39.430 --> 0:6:47.650
Eric Wong
Yeah, it in in platform all the codes are I can safely say quite all the codes are actually abstracted.
0:6:48.80 --> 0:6:55.290
Eric Wong
It's just that again, you know, even though we abstracted, there are certain things that maybe doesn't exist in certain other implementation or maybe additional stuff.
0:6:55.300 --> 0:7:3.120
Eric Wong
So so we have to pay attention in the area as well, which I at the moment I am not sure all zero what is actually required, yeah.
0:7:5.640 --> 0:7:10.50
Jasmine Tang
Maybe we should rename the SDK to API just to make sure everyone on the same page?
0:7:11.720 --> 0:7:12.780
Jasmine Tang
Anyone else will continue.
0:7:17.250 --> 0:7:19.690
Jasmine Tang
Uh, do we have a UI ready to do this right now?
0:7:24.450 --> 0:7:27.210
Jasmine Tang
So say we do at the bank right now. Don't have.
0:7:27.310 --> 0:7:28.70
Jasmine Tang
OK, alright.
0:7:31.10 --> 0:7:39.890
Jasmine Tang
So we call a tenant management feature the previous that I won't be you the tenant authentication that I mentioned just now.
0:7:40.280 --> 0:7:45.610
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I think we need a UI designer like just to make sure we have all this thing.
0:7:45.620 --> 0:7:51.830
Jasmine Tang
But, but no matter how, when we prioritize the trying to settle down to API, at least, let's say, who knows?
0:7:51.840 --> 0:7:55.360
Jasmine Tang
Maybe down the road we have other priority then we may rush all this thing.
0:7:55.370 --> 0:7:58.830
Jasmine Tang
Then at least the API work will do the job itself.
0:7:58.960 --> 0:8:2.990
Jasmine Tang
UI meanwhile, let UX team to take some time to to come up.
0:8:5.730 --> 0:8:20.350
Jasmine Tang
In this list that you are talking something that you discuss with Duraid as well as in like what is the extensive scope of the UI that we have for the tenant authentication page and what are the area that he also expect to be include as well?
0:8:22.160 --> 0:8:22.580
Jasmine Tang
Hey.
0:8:23.760 --> 0:8:27.730
Jasmine Tang
So I'll move on to the bot in port user.
0:8:28.140 --> 0:8:31.290
Jasmine Tang
I think we respect to key clock right now.
0:8:31.300 --> 0:8:58.270
Jasmine Tang
Actually, we really have department for users and the Internet and external and this is the old zero and one thing I think I want to confirm is I think no, it's fine, I understand this but import user ID is related to the one that to support like those OPS central level weight and also work right right on the related email that has been shared.
0:8:58.500 --> 0:8:59.860
Jasmine Tang
I suspect you'll be the same.
0:8:59.900 --> 0:9:0.870
Jasmine Tang
It's the same thing, right?
0:9:1.520 --> 0:9:9.470
Jasmine Tang
Maybe the dog import user need to enhance something that you pass in additional information that not belongs to IHOME one.
0:9:9.760 --> 0:9:26.970
Jasmine Tang
So like for example, let's say the one way we have a A position title for the user, then we need to support this position, title, additional elements, editional attributes to support inside these bulk import user.
0:9:27.330 --> 0:9:36.160
Jasmine Tang
But I home don't store this, but just pass the data to the user thing so user sync will do the job and pass to each product.
0:9:36.330 --> 0:9:39.210
Jasmine Tang
I think that's supposed to be the way I I I believe that's what to read.
0:9:39.930 --> 0:9:40.380
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:9:40.450 --> 0:9:41.540
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, we we should not.
0:9:42.470 --> 0:9:44.230
Jasmine Tang
So OK, but that depends.
0:9:44.0 --> 0:9:45.500
Eric Wong
Sorry, sorry, sorry.
0:9:45.510 --> 0:9:47.390
Eric Wong
Yeah, this bot user import, right?
0:9:48.460 --> 0:9:53.500
Eric Wong
Uh, we also talking about syncing back to the IDP, which is all 0, right?
0:9:54.930 --> 0:9:55.470
Jasmine Tang
Yes, yes.
0:9:55.550 --> 0:10:4.450
Jasmine Tang
So what you can mentioned the song is on syncing to the user to the product, but before we are able to sync to the product we go to create in the authentication services.
0:10:5.120 --> 0:10:9.130
Jasmine Tang
So this code right is not talk about seeing user Singh to the products.
0:10:9.640 --> 0:10:9.960
Eric Wong
Right.
0:10:9.220 --> 0:10:15.270
Jasmine Tang
This scope is talk painting in the authentication service, which is the 10 currently.
0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:15.810
Eric Wong
Yeah.
0:10:15.280 --> 0:10:16.650
Jasmine Tang
Do it quick.
0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:20.370
Eric Wong
So so my understanding is, yeah, this has nothing to do with the user sync.
0:10:20.560 --> 0:10:29.70
Eric Wong
This is just more about what we have now importing the CSV file or whatever in the future, but just at the moment what we have is CSV.
0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:34.180
Eric Wong
So just looking at what we have less than don't talk about the one way or anything, but just talk about what we have currently.
0:10:35.170 --> 0:10:42.360
Eric Wong
I think this will still work quite a straightforward with some minor changes, because ultimately the actual.
0:10:44.900 --> 0:10:51.110
Eric Wong
Implementation to actually push it back to the IDP is via the previous item, which is the.
0:10:53.810 --> 0:11:4.220
Eric Wong
One of the the the odd zero provider itself, that that's some somewhere there that we will also still call that and it will call the endpoints and it will pass the payload.
0:11:4.230 --> 0:11:7.720
Eric Wong
It's a similar way we create user from API.
0:11:7.730 --> 0:11:10.970
Eric Wong
We create user from this bulk import.
0:11:11.20 --> 0:11:20.790
Eric Wong
It will call the same call to do it, so that brings me to a question in terms of safe external user to Dynamo DB.
0:11:20.860 --> 0:11:25.910
Eric Wong
Yeah, I think that is something that so trying to understand what what what is that about, yeah.
0:11:26.810 --> 0:11:32.170
Jasmine Tang
And so Eric is not exactly same like keycloak like for audio is a bit different.
0:11:32.790 --> 0:11:33.10
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:11:33.140 --> 0:11:34.550
Jasmine Tang
1st is a.
0:11:34.600 --> 0:11:35.310
Jasmine Tang
Yes you can.
0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:39.10
Jasmine Tang
You can call on zero API to create user one by one.
0:11:39.620 --> 0:11:39.860
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:11:42.550 --> 0:11:42.750
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:11:39.350 --> 0:11:48.330
Jasmine Tang
They also have hot user features, but then the import feature user right, you go to reformat the data in Jason format instead of CSV.
0:11:48.730 --> 0:11:49.50
Eric Wong
OK.
0:11:48.820 --> 0:11:56.240
Jasmine Tang
So with the external user to Dynamodb is this part is different from Keycloak key code?
0:11:56.250 --> 0:12:0.580
Jasmine Tang
You can create a user external user into the KEYCODE database.
0:12:0.590 --> 0:12:1.580
Jasmine Tang
You can call it first.
0:12:1.820 --> 0:12:2.150
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:12:1.640 --> 0:12:4.680
Jasmine Tang
You can call the API and create first, but for all of 0, right?
0:12:4.690 --> 0:12:8.480
Jasmine Tang
If it is an external user it little they don't on board user.
0:12:8.610 --> 0:12:11.550
Jasmine Tang
That way you cannot on board an external user.
0:12:12.980 --> 0:12:20.200
Jasmine Tang
How the user will be created like it's after they are successfully authenticated, then on zero add them automatically into their database.
0:12:21.690 --> 0:12:23.980
Jasmine Tang
So this is how it works out in all zero.
0:12:24.210 --> 0:12:34.500
Jasmine Tang
So what happened here is we need to control so that even though that user is a valid user in that directory, but if they are not granted access to that applications then we want to block them.
0:12:36.390 --> 0:12:41.130
Jasmine Tang
And so for example, I didn't have an Ideagen directory, right?
0:12:41.170 --> 0:12:47.580
Jasmine Tang
So every Ideagen staff can log in will be successful, but then may not be.
0:12:47.650 --> 0:12:56.850
Jasmine Tang
All the user can access to that particular application so that like additional filtering to control the the the users of yeah.
0:12:56.860 --> 0:13:6.560
Jasmine Tang
For example, I say IT service product we should not, we should not be authenticated to access although we are a valid uh user and the Ideagen directory.
0:13:6.970 --> 0:13:9.450
Jasmine Tang
So there is the thing that we want.
0:13:9.460 --> 0:13:14.220
Jasmine Tang
We is the work around that we have to implement in our zero because this is how it works.
0:13:14.570 --> 0:13:21.800
Jasmine Tang
So what we do is we we create the user that we want the external user to allow in a separate database.
0:13:21.930 --> 0:13:28.820
Jasmine Tang
Then in all zero will implement it so that we check that this user is exists, although they can authenticate successful.
0:13:28.930 --> 0:13:33.110
Jasmine Tang
But if they are not exist right then we will reject their authentication OK.
0:13:35.660 --> 0:13:36.150
Jasmine Tang
List.
0:13:36.190 --> 0:13:37.670
Jasmine Tang
Let's say like me does.
0:13:37.680 --> 0:13:38.10
Jasmine Tang
Alright.
0:13:39.190 --> 0:13:40.590
Jasmine Tang
They could also, but at least.
0:13:40.940 --> 0:13:42.680
Jasmine Tang
Uh, yeah, yeah, yeah, quite close.
0:13:43.700 --> 0:13:45.70
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, cognito also like that.
0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.80
Jasmine Tang
Once you authenticate successfully, it just although at you into the.
0:13:49.260 --> 0:13:54.630
Jasmine Tang
Is there any difference between the native or zero and one that Federated 1 Federated?
0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.300
Jasmine Tang
We also have to do that only Federated.
0:13:57.310 --> 0:13:58.970
Jasmine Tang
We need to do this the native one.
0:13:58.980 --> 0:14:0.150
Jasmine Tang
We can pre create.
0:14:0.740 --> 0:14:1.910
Jasmine Tang
OK. OK.
0:14:2.270 --> 0:14:3.330
Jasmine Tang
OK, I think it makes sense.
0:14:3.340 --> 0:14:6.530
Jasmine Tang
The sometimes we sell the vacation to be organization.
0:14:6.700 --> 0:14:9.250
Jasmine Tang
They just want to have maybe one the people to use.
0:14:9.660 --> 0:14:14.100
Jasmine Tang
That's why they cannot allow all the people within the directory to use.
0:14:16.340 --> 0:14:17.990
Jasmine Tang
Uh, regarding this right?
0:14:18.40 --> 0:14:22.510
Jasmine Tang
Ohhh, when we do the estimation then I was you.
0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:33.610
Jasmine Tang
I was making the assumptions that when platform, even though you have an API to do bug in port, but when you create the user in authentication service you are calling the API one by one.
0:14:37.380 --> 0:14:37.610
Eric Wong
Yeah.
0:14:33.660 --> 0:14:38.20
Jasmine Tang
Create user one by one and I I I see Cara.
0:14:37.620 --> 0:14:38.330
Eric Wong
Yeah, correct.
0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:38.980
Eric Wong
Yes, correct.
0:14:38.900 --> 0:14:39.530
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:14:39.620 --> 0:14:44.850
Jasmine Tang
So I was making the assumption that we will not use the bulk import features for the authentication service.
0:14:45.80 --> 0:14:45.910
Jasmine Tang
They say of zero.
0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.0
Jasmine Tang
They have their own bulk import service.
0:14:50.330 --> 0:14:57.200
Jasmine Tang
Like, but then recently we we saw some limitations on the rate in off 0.
0:14:57.770 --> 0:15:10.260
Jasmine Tang
If we really cannot, if it really is a concern, then we might need to work on using their bulk import service, which means that you got to convert the user data into Jason format.
0:15:10.330 --> 0:15:21.80
Jasmine Tang
You cannot import using CSV format, so he still unknown that I I was doing a I was in the process of testing actually the limit is quite good.
0:15:21.210 --> 0:15:22.900
Jasmine Tang
It's not 50 user per minute.
0:15:22.970 --> 0:15:24.290
Jasmine Tang
You you mean the Bower single?
0:15:24.300 --> 0:15:32.500
Jasmine Tang
One single or I suggest we start with single first because single is slow, but at least we will be able to handle for multiple.
0:15:32.750 --> 0:15:36.530
Jasmine Tang
So when we got time, we come back and then enhance to make a bad one.
0:15:37.250 --> 0:15:38.920
Jasmine Tang
What was the difference with the CSV?
0:15:38.930 --> 0:15:40.230
Jasmine Tang
Because Bob.
0:15:40.270 --> 0:15:55.950
Jasmine Tang
Sorry, Bob and single also used USB or both support Jason single user users call their call their API passing the payload OK, but bulk import is you, uh outlook account.
0:15:57.180 --> 0:15:57.630
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:59.200
Jasmine Tang
OK, single user.
0:15:59.210 --> 0:16:0.210
Jasmine Tang
You don't need a file.
0:16:0.300 --> 0:16:2.850
Jasmine Tang
You just call the request and pass in the payload.
0:16:2.980 --> 0:16:8.270
Jasmine Tang
So looks like single one should be a lot easier to implement.
0:16:8.280 --> 0:16:26.220
Jasmine Tang
That maybe not much different opinion, but me testing voice, so I listen in platform, I listen I the CSV file, if I outlook 1000 user so how comfortable is you look through one by one and then create the user 1 by 1 right finger thread finger thread?
0:16:26.730 --> 0:16:27.770
Jasmine Tang
So what I noticed the.
0:16:27.170 --> 0:16:28.160
Eric Wong
Well, what?
0:16:28.330 --> 0:16:35.360
Eric Wong
What happened in platform right is when we upload a file there will be a passer running to check everything is alright.
0:16:35.710 --> 0:16:43.970
Eric Wong
So if everything is alright, then it will pump all this record into a a sync user table right?
0:16:44.400 --> 0:17:7.650
Eric Wong
So once the pump the thing user table uh, there will be job to uh push all this data into the user table at the same time it will set some uh authentication Singh job right to actually depends on the status of each object of of each user.
0:17:7.660 --> 0:17:13.810
Eric Wong
So if it will, it will do the job will do like a uh, in double loop, right?
0:17:13.820 --> 0:17:18.110
Eric Wong
So it will pick up whatever under certain certain status.
0:17:18.120 --> 0:17:35.210
Eric Wong
So once, once you pick out, let's say there's a, if I'm not mistaken, if I remember correctly, if there's 100 user then it will just use the 100 user and just loop it through and yeah call the payload, create a payload and call the keycode keycode API and just yeah, just populate into Kiko.
0:17:36.310 --> 0:17:37.680
Eric Wong
That's how it works currently.
0:17:36.470 --> 0:17:40.740
Jasmine Tang
Anything it is done using a single thread, right?
0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:42.30
Jasmine Tang
They missed.
0:17:41.860 --> 0:17:45.970
Eric Wong
Uh, I'm not sure I need to check back the code.
0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:47.990
Eric Wong
Possibly yes.
0:17:49.730 --> 0:17:49.930
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:17:55.710 --> 0:17:55.910
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:17:49.940 --> 0:17:59.620
Jasmine Tang
So for all zero I I checked this now single thread right is the rate is like P3 cost per second.
0:18:0.540 --> 0:18:10.150
Jasmine Tang
So if they say we are targeting to onboard 10,000 user, 20,000 user and the rate is 3/3 cores per second for a for one thread.
0:18:10.540 --> 0:18:10.750
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.160
Jasmine Tang
If that is not acceptable, then we still have to do the bulk importer.
0:18:15.30 --> 0:18:15.810
Jasmine Tang
I don't know. Like.
0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:22.310
Eric Wong
Right, I think I think the last round we populated data I can't remember CK is there right for performance testing.
0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:23.40
Eric Wong
I think it takes.
0:18:25.310 --> 0:18:26.470
Eric Wong
At all one day I remember.
0:18:38.510 --> 0:18:38.720
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:18:24.900 --> 0:18:39.790
Jasmine Tang
No, but the the concern raised by being Ping is that there's a rate being made being set in the Office 0 whereby the the the key right can accept as many as possible right.
0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:43.830
Jasmine Tang
The other zero days and we made, but there's only made the.
0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:49.760
Jasmine Tang
Eight, he said it can burst up to 15 per seconds, but that one I I checked that it's provider.
0:18:49.770 --> 0:18:50.720
Jasmine Tang
You have multiple thread.
0:18:51.590 --> 0:18:55.380
Jasmine Tang
If you only have one thread running right then it's like 3 per seconds only.
0:18:55.970 --> 0:19:0.460
Jasmine Tang
Ohh I see due to the latency I don't know because I was using Australia region.
0:19:0.790 --> 0:19:12.410
Jasmine Tang
It's not too far, so I'm not using US, so they even limit limit the number of request per thread, not minutes or seconds.
0:19:12.420 --> 0:19:15.100
Jasmine Tang
No, they don't limit that, but I was using J meter to test right.
0:19:15.110 --> 0:19:24.630
Jasmine Tang
So I notice that if you have many requests coming concurrent, yeah, then the but the uh, the room will be higher.
0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:25.330
Jasmine Tang
It would be high.
0:19:25.340 --> 0:19:25.790
Jasmine Tang
I see you.
0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:26.580
Jasmine Tang
Are you the only one?
0:19:26.590 --> 0:19:36.810
Jasmine Tang
I didn't like it because every call so they there's I I would say that single thread should be fine as long as we handle the retrial.
0:19:37.100 --> 0:19:43.930
Jasmine Tang
Let's say we are hitting a AI respond of, let's say limit. Rich.
0:19:44.260 --> 0:19:44.850
Jasmine Tang
We try.
0:19:44.920 --> 0:19:55.700
Jasmine Tang
So we just retry that and it it will it will, it will be longer, but at least this can be implemented first, then only we implement the multi thread.
0:19:55.960 --> 0:19:59.170
Jasmine Tang
That will be a another step up the the red limit.
0:19:59.180 --> 0:20:4.410
Jasmine Tang
I think with the three, three second three requests per second is is it doesn't hit their limits.
0:20:4.650 --> 0:20:5.790
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, it does.
0:20:5.860 --> 0:20:10.40
Jasmine Tang
Hey, can we accept and say we need to on what 10,000 user right?
0:20:10.50 --> 0:20:12.0
Jasmine Tang
Then it's going to take long time.
0:20:12.10 --> 0:20:12.800
Jasmine Tang
Very long. Yes.
0:20:13.30 --> 0:20:13.570
Jasmine Tang
No one.
0:20:13.750 --> 0:20:16.960
Jasmine Tang
All in that correct threes 3 per second time.
0:20:16.970 --> 0:20:30.420
Jasmine Tang
61 minute can 180 * 60 minute and one hour I think I think looks OK now if I think I feel like we should start single first and then worry about the about the the the bad one later.
0:20:30.490 --> 0:20:32.480
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, as long as we have to retry that.
0:20:32.850 --> 0:20:40.770
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, you can't really calculate on ourself on the on the red, but at least you have.
0:20:40.780 --> 0:20:41.260
Jasmine Tang
You can.
0:20:41.550 --> 0:21:1.550
Jasmine Tang
You can see it as a as a non fatal there are error response and then you can just do a retry but but take note that this limit right they have like production environment and development environment so development they they they have limits of lower limit try stay away you got the failure.
0:21:1.860 --> 0:21:9.870
Jasmine Tang
So when we do development, I don't know whether we are going to use a production one or development or development and you mean testing?
0:21:10.340 --> 0:21:11.630
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, we have a development now.
0:21:12.100 --> 0:21:16.30
Jasmine Tang
We need a separate that we need a separate the cow or development.
0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:23.250
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, separate account for development, but they still have the option to choose whether you want to go for development productions or staging.
0:21:23.400 --> 0:21:27.610
Jasmine Tang
I don't know whether they will be any change difference in terms of charges or not. OK.
0:21:27.620 --> 0:21:34.860
Jasmine Tang
But we want to ask them, but I would prefer a clear color between production and deep development.
0:21:34.870 --> 0:21:37.930
Jasmine Tang
That one is OK, the one as long as you use different account.
0:21:38.60 --> 0:21:44.160
Jasmine Tang
OK, but under the same account, should we use development or should we use production type?
0:21:44.170 --> 0:21:45.240
Jasmine Tang
They have different types.
0:21:45.310 --> 0:21:45.750
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:21:45.790 --> 0:21:47.580
Jasmine Tang
Maybe maybe dilemma wise.
0:21:47.670 --> 0:21:58.620
Jasmine Tang
Sometimes it's good to have this kind of instant within their their their design, so features testing on this thing we can use development, our staging and release and develop.
0:21:58.630 --> 0:21:59.920
Jasmine Tang
We can stick to production one.
0:21:59.960 --> 0:22:8.20
Jasmine Tang
I mean for our, then then then we can something goes wrong then we can it because when we update some value then then equal problematic or already.
0:22:8.80 --> 0:22:13.980
Jasmine Tang
So from our point of view, the develop just like a production for us, yeah, I understand.
0:22:13.990 --> 0:22:21.400
Jasmine Tang
But what I want to raise now is so that we are aware that that during the development right you see this error.
0:22:21.410 --> 0:22:24.660
Jasmine Tang
It doesn't mean when you switch to the production you are seeing the same error.
0:22:25.230 --> 0:22:31.810
Jasmine Tang
Because it apply different rate limit to different types of environment, that OK OK could do not good.
0:22:31.820 --> 0:22:36.550
Jasmine Tang
So if you if you see this and then if you can, then we switch to the production and test it out.
0:22:37.210 --> 0:22:46.610
Jasmine Tang
You will see that the limit so often once once we have a clearer a situation, we can order people who involved in this project we can decide on how we want to.
0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:49.790
Jasmine Tang
Ohh I have the same issue.
0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:50.970
Jasmine Tang
How we gonna manage that?
0:22:51.140 --> 0:22:54.370
Jasmine Tang
And then we also need to be make people aware.
0:22:54.520 --> 0:22:56.720
Jasmine Tang
You certain certain different type of different?
0:22:59.990 --> 0:23:0.210
Eric Wong
Right.
0:23:0.220 --> 0:23:0.420
Eric Wong
Yeah.
0:23:0.650 --> 0:23:1.840
Eric Wong
Can you run through?
0:23:1.970 --> 0:23:9.780
Eric Wong
Run us through on the roughly step by step on how how the Dynamo DB part, the safe external user come in place.
0:23:10.10 --> 0:23:11.30
Eric Wong
What was the expectation?
0:23:15.630 --> 0:23:15.820
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:23:12.300 --> 0:23:23.730
Jasmine Tang
Uh, when you import a user right in the API, I noticed that in platform service the CSV file you have a flag to to say this is an internal external user MRI.
0:23:23.530 --> 0:23:24.520
Eric Wong
Uh, yes, correct. Yes.
0:23:24.530 --> 0:23:25.330
Eric Wong
Yes. Umm.
0:23:31.930 --> 0:23:32.140
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
0:23:25.350 --> 0:23:38.970
Jasmine Tang
So when you look through what it means for the external user, instead of calling the API to create the user calling the Office API to create the user for external user, you don't call but you add that entry into the Dynamodb.
0:23:41.40 --> 0:23:41.270
Eric Wong
Right.
0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:41.710
Eric Wong
So we should.
0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:42.410
Eric Wong
I don't know DB.
0:23:44.170 --> 0:23:44.390
Jasmine Tang
Will you?
0:23:42.420 --> 0:23:47.560
Eric Wong
This is it, our own Dynamo DB or all zero Dynamo DB or yeah.
0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:50.800
Eric Wong
OK.
0:23:48.760 --> 0:24:4.820
Jasmine Tang
I will, under the more baby three we we should be having a separate authentication service that is in the Excel sheet after the platform so that authentication service should create a Dynamodb eventually when we're using the formula.
0:24:4.830 --> 0:24:6.840
Jasmine Tang
So the telephone will create Dynamodb.
0:24:9.10 --> 0:24:9.600
Eric Wong
Right.
0:24:10.420 --> 0:24:10.760
Jasmine Tang
So far.
0:24:10.10 --> 0:24:17.910
Eric Wong
So mean to say moving forward when we want to authenticate a user, it will go through the authentication service instead of directly to all zero.
0:24:20.110 --> 0:24:22.260
Jasmine Tang
No, no, no, it's it's directly to the audio.
0:24:22.270 --> 0:24:29.800
Jasmine Tang
The authentication service is to do a building, set up the off 0 setting because off 0 we need customization also.
0:24:30.290 --> 0:24:30.530
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:24:33.690 --> 0:24:33.910
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
0:24:30.90 --> 0:24:35.440
Jasmine Tang
So the authentication service will do all those customizations and then pass the.
0:24:35.870 --> 0:24:46.40
Jasmine Tang
And we need to stream the user authentication event to change log so the authentication service will do those kind of things are.
0:24:47.730 --> 0:24:48.0
Eric Wong
Right.
0:24:48.10 --> 0:24:50.150
Eric Wong
So OK, correct me if I'm wrong.
0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:52.940
Eric Wong
So it sounds like authentication service is only used for external user.
0:24:56.100 --> 0:24:56.760
Eric Wong
Is that how it goes?
0:24:56.10 --> 0:24:58.520
Jasmine Tang
And no, uh, that's making.
0:24:58.530 --> 0:24:59.230
Jasmine Tang
Scroll down please.
0:25:0.490 --> 0:25:4.80
Jasmine Tang
Little authentic the auth service here like this.
0:25:6.30 --> 0:25:6.220
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
0:25:4.90 --> 0:25:11.850
Jasmine Tang
This this chunk right is to prepare the of 0 so that we can start using it.
0:25:13.700 --> 0:25:13.980
Eric Wong
OK.
0:25:15.420 --> 0:25:20.540
Jasmine Tang
So for example, if you see with the action.
0:25:23.830 --> 0:25:25.300
Jasmine Tang
A line #20, right?
0:25:25.630 --> 0:25:28.600
Jasmine Tang
20 we will have a node JS for action for example.
0:25:29.300 --> 0:25:29.500
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
0:25:29.580 --> 0:25:36.240
Jasmine Tang
So what we need to do is we need to customize off 0 so that we get the user journey that we want.
0:25:37.270 --> 0:25:37.610
Eric Wong
OK.
0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:41.850
Jasmine Tang
For example, when user log in for the first time, we want them to do the consent.
0:25:47.860 --> 0:25:48.110
Eric Wong
OK.
0:25:41.910 --> 0:25:50.60
Jasmine Tang
We want them to do the reset password, so all zero doesn't come default with all these features, so we need to use to customize it.
0:25:51.40 --> 0:25:58.790
Jasmine Tang
So the authentication service is to make those customizations available when we set up a new new new account in Outlook.
0:26:1.200 --> 0:26:2.10
Eric Wong
Right, right.
0:26:3.160 --> 0:26:3.590
Eric Wong
OK.
0:26:3.660 --> 0:26:8.130
Eric Wong
Because OK, like like now when we do, uh, when the user log in right?
0:26:8.600 --> 0:26:19.530
Eric Wong
I think we directly he think key code in the sense that the the particular uh realm URL to actually check if this user have a session.
0:26:19.540 --> 0:26:30.860
Eric Wong
If not, then key code itself will actually prompt the login screen so the login screen is never on platform or on our spa, but a lot of people thought it's on the platform and spa, but it's actually from the key code.
0:26:31.60 --> 0:26:43.250
Eric Wong
So in this sense, I can, I say moving forward with off 0, this particular journey will actually just hitting a the odd service and off service will do the rest dealing with all of 0.
0:26:44.300 --> 0:26:44.530
Jasmine Tang
No.
0:26:44.540 --> 0:26:47.240
Jasmine Tang
Uh, the off 0 will still do whatever keycode is doing.
0:26:48.90 --> 0:26:49.160
Eric Wong
OK, OK.
0:26:49.310 --> 0:26:50.310
Eric Wong
So you just OK.
0:26:51.250 --> 0:26:51.680
Eric Wong
Sorry, go ahead.
0:27:1.350 --> 0:27:1.590
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:26:49.430 --> 0:27:1.620
Jasmine Tang
Of the reason just to off service is like you know, it's like when we customize on key code and then we deploy key code to to EKS something like that.
0:27:2.300 --> 0:27:7.110
Jasmine Tang
So for obviously off service is to customize the off 0.
0:27:7.600 --> 0:27:16.680
Jasmine Tang
So when you when user log in like you are hitting the off 0 login page of the of service itself don't have Low impatient.
0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:19.140
Eric Wong
OK.
0:27:20.460 --> 0:27:24.150
Jasmine Tang
But let's say uh off 0, right?
0:27:26.910 --> 0:27:27.140
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:35.260
Jasmine Tang
It doesn't have a consent page, so the off service prepare a consent page so that when user log in, it got redirected to the consent page to to to give the content.
0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:44.640
Eric Wong
So I mean, regardless the user when they log in, they will first thing that will always hit the off the off service first, right?
0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.520
Jasmine Tang
Of zero hit directly.
0:27:47.40 --> 0:27:47.730
Eric Wong
Of zero first.
0:27:49.960 --> 0:27:50.340
Eric Wong
OK.
0:27:50.350 --> 0:27:55.280
Eric Wong
And then from there you will talk to the off service to have the consent patients so on so forth.
0:27:57.250 --> 0:27:57.500
Jasmine Tang
Uh.
0:27:55.290 --> 0:27:58.700
Eric Wong
Is it this I'm trying to understand the user journey.
0:28:8.680 --> 0:28:9.80
Eric Wong
Umm.
0:27:59.980 --> 0:28:12.890
Jasmine Tang
I think I think I probably, I said knowledge sharing sessions are with the team on how off 0 works are and compared to keyboard we have a diagrams how the workflow move we teach.
0:28:12.900 --> 0:28:13.210
Jasmine Tang
Maybe.
0:28:13.220 --> 0:28:14.90
Jasmine Tang
Maybe we need one.
0:28:14.100 --> 0:28:19.350
Jasmine Tang
So then people see that and sessions go through together with audio and Heimdall.
0:28:19.360 --> 0:28:21.260
Jasmine Tang
So then and.
0:28:22.180 --> 0:28:27.290
Eric Wong
Yeah, that, that, that would be that would be great actually, yeah, because I'm I'm trying to compare it with what we have at the moment.
0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.630
Eric Wong
So that's that's the confusion here.
0:28:29.780 --> 0:28:37.330
Eric Wong
And plus second thing is when you talk about putting Dynamo DB and then need to authenticate, so if it's not in all zero.
0:28:37.340 --> 0:28:45.330
Eric Wong
So that's the reason I also want to find out that if it's not in off 0, what kind of authentication mechanism are we talking about to authenticate external user?
0:28:45.660 --> 0:28:48.490
Eric Wong
Like is it through the external IDP first or how?
0:28:48.620 --> 0:28:49.520
Eric Wong
Does that work?
0:28:49.530 --> 0:28:51.880
Eric Wong
You know, before you pump into off zero, yeah.
0:28:52.850 --> 0:28:55.520
Jasmine Tang
I think it will be easier that I carry out the sessions.
0:28:56.260 --> 0:28:56.930
Eric Wong
Hmm, OK.
0:28:56.910 --> 0:28:58.120
Jasmine Tang
I feel like, yeah.
0:28:58.870 --> 0:28:59.530
Eric Wong
Alright, thanks.
0:29:1.530 --> 0:29:10.760
Jasmine Tang
Ignore the external user with you used the dynamic panel TV or you can have alternative to use the the base connection.
0:29:10.810 --> 0:29:11.640
Jasmine Tang
Ohh sorry sorry.
0:29:14.200 --> 0:29:15.670
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, sorry.
0:29:15.720 --> 0:29:16.350
Jasmine Tang
Ohh yeah, yeah yeah.
0:29:16.360 --> 0:29:16.600
Jasmine Tang
Thanks.
0:29:17.290 --> 0:29:28.800
Jasmine Tang
That number did was for the committal for all zero is, yeah, we are using back there that they are database but they have their own database connection.
0:29:29.310 --> 0:29:34.960
Jasmine Tang
But then we cannot be storing the local user and the external user to the same database.
0:29:34.970 --> 0:29:42.190
Jasmine Tang
We are using their data one separate database to solve the external user, but not not anybody be able.
0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:42.840
Jasmine Tang
Should we call it?
0:29:42.850 --> 0:29:47.610
Jasmine Tang
Just popped through database I the link is something that we can define.
0:29:47.620 --> 0:29:49.970
Jasmine Tang
So I just called the OHS, so we did a visa.
0:29:51.340 --> 0:29:59.610
Jasmine Tang
OK, what else for I said, this is the what's the worst thing that it's for external user like user. OK.
0:30:1.360 --> 0:30:1.600
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:30:3.870 --> 0:30:4.180
Jasmine Tang
Thank you.
0:30:4.400 --> 0:30:6.90
Jasmine Tang
And doing it so fast.
0:30:6.600 --> 0:30:7.650
Jasmine Tang
Don't do anything.
0:30:7.660 --> 0:30:10.870
Jasmine Tang
OK, I just my eyes cannot catch up.
0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:20.650
Jasmine Tang
I think we need to add 1 more column here and we be or not so we can let people the prioritize nicely done.
0:30:21.60 --> 0:30:21.470
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:30:21.660 --> 0:30:24.220
Jasmine Tang
So OK it is.
0:30:26.40 --> 0:30:26.650
Jasmine Tang
I've seen it.
0:30:26.660 --> 0:30:28.540
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, this is the off 0 connection, right?
0:30:28.620 --> 0:30:31.110
Jasmine Tang
They have their own user DB, right?
0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:33.120
Jasmine Tang
And they manage it themselves.
0:30:33.130 --> 0:30:34.470
Jasmine Tang
We don't know how they manage it.
0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:36.810
Jasmine Tang
User DB like their own user did their own user.
0:30:36.970 --> 0:30:40.630
Jasmine Tang
Let's call 0 user, but we can create many user DB.
0:30:40.860 --> 0:30:49.970
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, we can define and then send send as a connection like to tell the off 0 to use that connection so.
0:30:52.400 --> 0:30:52.960
Jasmine Tang
We don't need to.
0:30:53.290 --> 0:31:1.380
Jasmine Tang
Many already talked to the DB, so it's just yeah, it's just a matter of tell the of 0 to use that connection.
0:31:1.590 --> 0:31:1.880
Jasmine Tang
There's.
0:31:1.890 --> 0:31:5.690
Jasmine Tang
So where do we saw the flat for those concerns?
0:31:5.700 --> 0:31:10.0
Jasmine Tang
Thing is, it also in the user DB is a users meta data.
0:31:10.50 --> 0:31:12.370
Jasmine Tang
OK, so every user will have meta data.
0:31:14.590 --> 0:31:15.820
Jasmine Tang
Little Sin.
0:31:17.740 --> 0:31:22.110
Jasmine Tang
OK, so extends to this particular scope.
0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:28.840
Jasmine Tang
I think that's a have the section first between the keycloak and there's all zero.
0:31:30.460 --> 0:31:32.170
Jasmine Tang
So regarding this particular.
0:31:33.650 --> 0:31:35.130
Jasmine Tang
Requirement right.
0:31:35.200 --> 0:31:36.950
Jasmine Tang
I think I have something to share about.
0:31:37.80 --> 0:31:38.390
Jasmine Tang
Like what?
0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:45.150
Jasmine Tang
I home BAU is carrying practicing right now and if we will need to change this and what is the impact of it?
0:31:45.270 --> 0:31:51.220
Jasmine Tang
So right now at this moment, I think the logic is I think first thing first is we provide an option.
0:31:52.700 --> 0:31:57.630
Jasmine Tang
For the user Frater or the service team to block the lift.
0:31:58.700 --> 0:32:8.940
Jasmine Tang
So basically, how do they actually bug delete the user is I think whoever user that currently in system we actually have a protected field.
0:32:9.280 --> 0:32:14.240
Jasmine Tang
OK, so example right now in the application system itself, I have been paying.
0:32:14.250 --> 0:32:17.930
Jasmine Tang
I have just so and then I have all the team normal member.
0:32:18.0 --> 0:32:26.970
Jasmine Tang
So right now my objective is to keep thing Ping and just mean in this particular application, but the rest of the people I would like to remove it so the.
0:32:28.470 --> 0:32:34.310
Jasmine Tang
Procedure will be we need to set the protected field for pimping and need to be true first.
0:32:34.610 --> 0:32:40.920
Jasmine Tang
There is a UI that we can set that and then in the import we also have the function to set that as well, right?
0:32:41.90 --> 0:32:47.960
Jasmine Tang
So once this is done, then the user administrator or the service derating they can just import the empty file.
0:32:48.490 --> 0:32:54.900
Jasmine Tang
So all the Members that without protected it set it will be bug delete.
0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:58.450
Jasmine Tang
So this is part of the feature that last time is required.
0:32:58.460 --> 0:33:1.460
Jasmine Tang
So we have this particular features and also.
0:33:2.320 --> 0:33:3.220
Jasmine Tang
Uh.
0:33:4.560 --> 0:33:12.790
Jasmine Tang
Need to say there will always be a comparison between the user import file versus the system.
0:33:13.140 --> 0:33:19.170
Jasmine Tang
So as long as the the user protected flat is being set as false, false.
0:33:19.430 --> 0:33:27.970
Jasmine Tang
So the user in the system will be deleted from the system as long as it does not detect in the user import file, right?
0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:33.380
Jasmine Tang
So regarding this requirement cannot delete user, they are not found in the file.
0:33:33.390 --> 0:33:35.470
Jasmine Tang
Need to provide ability to update.
0:33:35.480 --> 0:33:36.540
Jasmine Tang
Some ideas that go around?
0:33:36.840 --> 0:33:37.730
Jasmine Tang
Yeah. Right.
0:33:38.390 --> 0:33:39.430
Jasmine Tang
Umm.
0:33:39.730 --> 0:34:5.880
Jasmine Tang
Then we need to see, I think, because the whole process for this right is more or molding new user when you wanted to delete something we shouldn't use the Excel spreadsheet to do something like maybe that should have a function in the iPhone to select those user one to delete and then just leave retinal at this moment if you want to delete from the table itself, I think you need you only can go to buy 1 by 1 manually.
0:34:6.150 --> 0:34:9.340
Jasmine Tang
So this is for the bug delete purposes.
0:34:9.690 --> 0:34:19.250
Jasmine Tang
So I think the next question is if we were to have this particular requirement, so are we also need to support in terms of bug delayed?
0:34:19.630 --> 0:34:29.500
Jasmine Tang
So if we need to support our bug delete, then we need to see how this can be worked to achieve in the same goal as you need support the bug delete function as well as it also support this.
0:34:29.510 --> 0:34:34.270
Jasmine Tang
But this definitely going to change the current logic already, as in the protected field.
0:34:34.680 --> 0:34:49.690
Jasmine Tang
As in, how do we compare the CSV and the the user that in the application itself the protected feel right is stopped in I home database and but you don't store anything in the key corner existing.
0:34:49.860 --> 0:34:56.130
Jasmine Tang
I don't think it's going to be seen the iPhone itself, so sounds like we don't need the radio because we didn't know.
0:34:56.180 --> 0:35:9.580
Jasmine Tang
I think this recommended because we didn't know there's a work around with protected from ability and but in the future I think we need a ability to do bulk delete from the screen, but then I can do later that we OK yeah, but.
0:35:8.760 --> 0:35:14.830
SueAnn See
Umm, so so the the main thing to consider here is that this is not a one time importer.
0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:27.710
SueAnn See
Because what happened right now is that there one way of central they all right, they have this facility for clients to upload a CSV file, put it into a queue and then the next day you'll be automatically imported.
0:35:27.920 --> 0:35:31.710
SueAnn See
So that means it's a ongoing onboarding process.
0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:32.930
SueAnn See
It's not just one time.
0:35:34.610 --> 0:35:38.260
Jasmine Tang
They can set the user to be protected, not then it doesn't need to.
0:35:38.840 --> 0:35:39.370
SueAnn See
Now who?
0:35:39.380 --> 0:35:44.120
SueAnn See
Who is going to stand so very dangerous if by default it's not protected?
0:35:45.980 --> 0:35:57.860
Jasmine Tang
I think the tenant admin have to do that, but I I believe that we cannot cater for all the needs are if if looking at the there's a work around with that of, they're definitely content of all the production.
0:35:59.610 --> 0:36:0.390
Jasmine Tang
I think so too.
0:35:59.620 --> 0:36:4.940
SueAnn See
Maybe it's just set it to default as protected, right?
0:36:5.610 --> 0:36:8.730
Jasmine Tang
Actually, salsa, I mean depends.
0:36:8.830 --> 0:36:41.40
Jasmine Tang
Depends what the usage and it's hard to say really need to talk to those product but but that request like that right request Ideagen this one is inherited from iPhone BAU like the Qi mean, the QPC and essentially what it called QPC and also the yeah essential but then this is this particular features is in IHOME via U 2.1 we need to say the one you click so the one in production basically don't have but last time I think we have this particular requirement I can't remember I think it's from bins that have this particular requirement.
0:36:41.250 --> 0:36:41.560
Jasmine Tang
Don't you?
0:36:41.570 --> 0:36:42.380
Jasmine Tang
Don't one.
0:36:42.390 --> 0:36:43.160
Jasmine Tang
We don't have visa.
0:36:43.270 --> 0:36:43.870
Jasmine Tang
You have this as.
0:36:43.880 --> 0:36:44.820
Jasmine Tang
Ohh you have.
0:36:45.610 --> 0:36:47.980
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, same logic because it's inherited from iPhone.
0:36:48.100 --> 0:36:54.100
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, that's like maybe need you to think a bit ohm how you want the logic to be.
0:36:55.260 --> 0:36:57.670
Jasmine Tang
But I think difficult cattle for all the all the.
0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:58.260
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, this one.
0:36:58.300 --> 0:37:0.460
Jasmine Tang
So I can just do something that more sensible?
0:37:0.660 --> 0:37:1.110
Jasmine Tang
Yep.
0:37:1.160 --> 0:37:13.230
Jasmine Tang
But I think in the release mode, or even how do we actually pass the information to service delivery team is maybe we need to let them know the stack of it because right now ask is already practicing that.
0:37:13.240 --> 0:37:22.670
Jasmine Tang
So you just need to when you import the user, you just need to ensure it by default you set the flag everything to yes, so all of the user is already being in the protected.
0:37:23.60 --> 0:37:33.430
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, but if you look at normally how people do software when you meet import it really very importantly doesn't release thing the user.
0:37:35.550 --> 0:37:36.680
Jasmine Tang
It is my my.
0:37:36.690 --> 0:37:37.20
Jasmine Tang
It's OK.
0:37:37.30 --> 0:37:42.70
Jasmine Tang
I think we can partner aside cause as long as there's a little round, we protect the probability.
0:37:45.280 --> 0:37:45.450
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:37:46.710 --> 0:37:53.450
Jasmine Tang
Let me just, but can you create the column with MPs so so I just, yeah, yeah.
0:38:2.490 --> 0:38:5.740
Jasmine Tang
OK, you can, Eric.
0:38:6.230 --> 0:38:11.350
Jasmine Tang
He's highlight if you see anything missing like because my knowledge for platform also needed.
0:38:11.940 --> 0:38:15.940
Jasmine Tang
So I just I just put down whatever that I can catch a lot.
0:38:16.300 --> 0:38:16.730
Eric Wong
Yeah.
0:38:16.740 --> 0:38:17.30
Eric Wong
Yeah.
0:38:17.80 --> 0:38:18.290
Eric Wong
No, no worries about that.
0:38:18.440 --> 0:38:20.930
Eric Wong
It's just that the cannot delete user part.
0:38:21.80 --> 0:38:33.560
Eric Wong
I also was thinking when you guys discussed it, I was just thinking that the reason, if I'm not mistaken, the reason one of the reasons why this was uh put in is because they are still some user who prefer to do things on Excel sheet.
0:38:34.830 --> 0:38:35.460
Eric Wong
Yeah.
0:38:36.290 --> 0:38:36.620
Jasmine Tang
I.
0:38:35.630 --> 0:38:42.820
Eric Wong
So they just not just create new user but more like using that instead of use you I to do things in a batch.
0:38:42.830 --> 0:38:44.200
Eric Wong
They wanna do things in the batch, yeah.
0:38:50.530 --> 0:38:50.770
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
0:38:45.580 --> 0:38:54.810
Jasmine Tang
For this dinner is more like the features in platform with the allowed or not allowed can or cannot do so much on whether the authentication service support or not support.
0:38:55.630 --> 0:38:56.170
Eric Wong
Hmm, OK.
0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:57.90
Jasmine Tang
You know, because you didn't delete things.
0:38:59.940 --> 0:39:0.230
Eric Wong
Right.
0:39:7.990 --> 0:39:8.290
Eric Wong
Right.
0:38:57.100 --> 0:39:8.610
Jasmine Tang
Just call the API to delete the user key code obviously for the so I think this one has nothing to do with the based off 0 optical Python service itself.
0:39:10.340 --> 0:39:14.230
Eric Wong
Just out of curiosity, where do they point cannot delete user that are not found in file come from?
0:39:17.80 --> 0:39:19.0
Jasmine Tang
But OK, not either by Mia did it.
0:39:20.60 --> 0:39:20.650
Eric Wong
I don't know who.
0:39:21.30 --> 0:39:24.270
SueAnn See
No, because it it is.
0:39:20.100 --> 0:39:24.970
Jasmine Tang
You bringing only me as well because I think that.
0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:27.680
SueAnn See
Uh, because the product has the requirement.
0:39:27.950 --> 0:39:38.430
SueAnn See
Currently they have this facility where client can just upload a file and it will be automatically process so nobody is going to go into the system and you'll set protected.
0:39:39.440 --> 0:39:42.440
SueAnn See
So it's a change of the operational workflow.
0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:56.220
SueAnn See
So if let's say we say for MVP, we're not gonna make any changes to our system, some wanted to go and communicate all these steps to all the respective products that we are integrating and make sure that they are OK and agreeable with all these steps.
0:39:58.440 --> 0:39:58.640
Eric Wong
OK.
0:40:0.900 --> 0:40:5.630
Jasmine Tang
And then I did this thing we thought has a parking 1st and then that key to do it.
0:40:5.640 --> 0:40:8.350
Jasmine Tang
So the rest of it looks like quite solid.
0:40:18.550 --> 0:40:24.510
Jasmine Tang
So I will be the similar concept and thing is just that this is more on the.
0:40:26.770 --> 0:40:27.40
Jasmine Tang
Singh.
0:40:27.190 --> 0:40:27.820
Jasmine Tang
User right?
0:40:27.830 --> 0:40:29.160
Jasmine Tang
So yeah, OK.
0:40:29.210 --> 0:40:34.690
Jasmine Tang
It's about important and creating the user handling now, so it's two different or different.
0:40:34.700 --> 0:40:35.300
Jasmine Tang
OK, alright.
0:40:35.310 --> 0:40:38.520
Jasmine Tang
So if you if you choose to go for single user first then we don't.
0:40:39.890 --> 0:40:41.840
Jasmine Tang
We can ignore about import the shop.
0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:52.230
Jasmine Tang
I think for about import we put estimation not available first love but we we work on the single user first but just OK sign out when we put down.
0:40:52.240 --> 0:40:57.750
Jasmine Tang
Here I we're talking about the bulk import for the obvious zero itself, not platform.
0:40:59.350 --> 0:41:2.240
Jasmine Tang
Platform you can support bug import, but you can call in.
0:41:2.510 --> 0:41:7.810
Jasmine Tang
Ohh yeah, you mean the the the platform called the zero, the one by one.
0:41:7.940 --> 0:41:12.290
Jasmine Tang
OK, I think it make me kill it clear bit this decide.
0:41:12.590 --> 0:41:19.810
Jasmine Tang
Originally this list all zero, no additional features about if the if the if it because I was thinking of three.
0:41:19.820 --> 0:41:26.920
Jasmine Tang
If you can support single user then the so just call the loop and call the single yes look.
0:41:26.930 --> 0:41:29.670
Jasmine Tang
Then she currently platform in in the right.
0:41:29.760 --> 0:41:34.130
Jasmine Tang
That means we are the important CSV, then we don't need to change so many in the background.
0:41:34.140 --> 0:41:34.920
Jasmine Tang
You are calling keycloak.
0:41:36.820 --> 0:41:37.680
Jasmine Tang
Thank great.
0:41:37.690 --> 0:41:40.110
Jasmine Tang
User one by one one by one, right?
0:41:40.300 --> 0:41:40.810
Jasmine Tang
So.
0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:48.830
Jasmine Tang
So in that case we are using the create single user features are but because all zero you can also do a bulk import.
0:41:49.100 --> 0:41:50.80
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, so.
0:41:52.870 --> 0:41:54.960
Jasmine Tang
But you would thought you bought us all this.
0:41:55.10 --> 0:42:10.0
Jasmine Tang
Is is it just to just to populate the data in the database on our database and then the the end there's a back end background Provisioner will pick up, pick up the data yeah and it will just sync with keycloak one by one.
0:42:10.50 --> 0:42:13.500
Jasmine Tang
In this case it will be off 01 by 1. Yeah.
0:42:13.510 --> 0:42:14.200
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:42:14.530 --> 0:42:20.280
Jasmine Tang
So so when we talk about this one right, not really referring to the platform service before.
0:42:21.30 --> 0:42:31.70
Jasmine Tang
So when you say this is actually not one by one, but it's more like a parallel real but from platform like you can also pass one file to all zero.
0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:35.440
Jasmine Tang
OK, let me create all the user as an OX0 features.
0:42:35.450 --> 0:42:41.160
Jasmine Tang
There's an audio features take OK if you want to leave then that's.
0:42:41.170 --> 0:42:42.770
Jasmine Tang
I think that just hold on.
0:42:45.20 --> 0:42:50.660
Jasmine Tang
Having a real body and the that's the that's just for girls single user.
0:42:50.670 --> 0:42:56.700
Jasmine Tang
Since the limit looks like not not like totally very very very low limit.
0:42:56.750 --> 0:42:57.460
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:42:57.510 --> 0:42:57.610
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:42:58.450 --> 0:43:0.420
Jasmine Tang
So this is like uh, if compared to keycloak.
0:43:0.430 --> 0:43:4.640
Jasmine Tang
This like a sharp features that that they already have it embedded that we can use it.
0:43:4.710 --> 0:43:9.200
Jasmine Tang
But I think people will have to read massage your CSV because it cannot accept CSV.
0:43:9.710 --> 0:43:14.450
Jasmine Tang
True, that means you got to accept your CSV.
0:43:14.460 --> 0:43:19.430
Jasmine Tang
Then you reconstruct a Jason because they can't even be different format, right?
0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:27.940
Jasmine Tang
Even format you don't don't even have that, so the bug import here is means of 0 features, not platform service.
0:43:28.790 --> 0:43:30.700
Jasmine Tang
But if we testing need to test all.
0:43:30.710 --> 0:43:39.510
Jasmine Tang
So after you've done the single user then need to make sure the import the platform import still can work.
0:43:41.690 --> 0:43:45.950
Jasmine Tang
Then we need to test that because I I believe it's called calling in the end, calling the same call.
0:43:46.980 --> 0:43:47.370
Jasmine Tang
So.
0:43:47.380 --> 0:43:55.610
Jasmine Tang
So there's been two things out we need to support the app user add single user into all zero need to convert the CCSU CSV format to Jason.
0:43:56.630 --> 0:44:9.440
Jasmine Tang
After that we all the implementation in the all the form, all zero at the top that I think that should worry but the the 1st and but import is not an NPR right?
0:44:10.410 --> 0:44:11.610
Jasmine Tang
Then I heard is not right.
0:44:12.400 --> 0:44:15.110
Jasmine Tang
I think like we can buy something because we do the same thing.
0:44:15.300 --> 0:44:21.540
Jasmine Tang
We doing the same thing with the most high scalable way we we can come back and do that later when we settle all the.
0:44:21.550 --> 0:44:31.90
Jasmine Tang
That's why better have a column where MVP and market 1st it's, but it's not part of MVP is not using all 0SMP or there's no feature for but upload for.
0:44:31.910 --> 0:44:34.160
Jasmine Tang
It's not outlook in headphones still valid.
0:44:34.850 --> 0:44:39.390
Jasmine Tang
You're able to see what is behind that, but important.
0:44:39.510 --> 0:44:41.880
Jasmine Tang
They're giving you natural voices are available.
0:44:43.530 --> 0:44:43.890
Jasmine Tang
So.
0:44:43.900 --> 0:44:47.270
Jasmine Tang
So imagine the current import user in the platform.
0:44:47.280 --> 0:44:59.780
Jasmine Tang
We still need to maintain, I mean we can maintain the CSU CSV, but in at the end when you store to you because it's in the way the same as per how we practice for people.
0:45:0.650 --> 0:45:0.940
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:45:1.160 --> 0:45:2.710
Jasmine Tang
And we can, you know, where is it?
0:45:1.320 --> 0:45:4.570
SueAnn See
But you you cannot just maintain, right?
0:45:4.580 --> 0:45:6.340
SueAnn See
You have to add the custom fields also.
0:45:7.320 --> 0:45:10.720
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I understand that is a separate thing that need to think about.
0:45:11.360 --> 0:45:12.250
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I understand that.
0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:16.850
Jasmine Tang
So I mean specifically on this area, just want to reconfirm that.
0:45:17.200 --> 0:45:18.580
Jasmine Tang
So that's not failing.
0:45:18.590 --> 0:45:23.630
Jasmine Tang
Mentioned the bug report here is specifically on the feature on the All zero itself, right?
0:45:23.720 --> 0:45:30.350
Jasmine Tang
So right now I think the MVP current reset has no first, but I think we still need to proceed with this.
0:45:30.680 --> 0:45:31.590
Jasmine Tang
That's that.
0:45:31.810 --> 0:45:41.300
Jasmine Tang
And then the current bug import function that only by a platform still need to maintain but is in the sense of like.
0:45:41.310 --> 0:45:46.20
Jasmine Tang
How do we do it for keycloak like 1 by 1 as per the API call?
0:45:46.110 --> 0:45:46.930
Jasmine Tang
I mean right?
0:45:47.850 --> 0:45:57.280
Jasmine Tang
I I suggest that because I some just CSV information putting at the bar import we should move it to the Group One single single serve one.
0:45:57.700 --> 0:46:6.890
Jasmine Tang
So when Buu import me, believe me later no for this one it as long as we don't mix it with platform features that will be fine and you mean no?
0:46:7.200 --> 0:46:7.710
Jasmine Tang
Maybe.
0:46:7.800 --> 0:46:13.730
Jasmine Tang
Maybe I will kind of like separate out this one is about import for all zero and then I just separate another one.
0:46:13.740 --> 0:46:18.990
Jasmine Tang
Is spot import for platform itself and then what are the scope then we can review again and see.
0:46:19.60 --> 0:46:19.950
Jasmine Tang
Yes, I can. OK.
0:46:26.720 --> 0:46:27.350
Jasmine Tang
Uh, sorry.
0:46:27.360 --> 0:46:28.590
Jasmine Tang
So the the, the, the.
0:46:28.600 --> 0:46:30.770
Jasmine Tang
Then what they should change to the bug?
0:46:30.780 --> 0:46:31.470
Jasmine Tang
Zero database.
0:46:32.770 --> 0:46:33.290
Jasmine Tang
Yeah. OK.
0:46:38.380 --> 0:46:39.140
Jasmine Tang
8 but.
0:46:41.660 --> 0:46:41.860
Jasmine Tang
Zero.
0:46:43.420 --> 0:46:43.980
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:46:44.30 --> 0:46:45.370
Jasmine Tang
Fox space, right?
0:46:45.380 --> 0:46:48.970
Jasmine Tang
OK, they narrator, narrator window.
0:46:49.80 --> 0:46:50.50
Jasmine Tang
Welcome to naric.
0:46:50.60 --> 0:46:50.550
Jasmine Tang
No, no.
0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:54.600
Jasmine Tang
Next to no next edit box, I thought that exiting narrator.
0:46:58.990 --> 0:47:0.390
Jasmine Tang
That we use any AI tools.
0:47:1.40 --> 0:47:12.10
Jasmine Tang
I don't know why sell, but notice accessibility, but that's come from where we wish and he's on my laptop.
0:47:12.20 --> 0:47:15.680
Jasmine Tang
How come you got the minute ago into Jasmine that?
0:47:18.270 --> 0:47:20.900
Jasmine Tang
Into Dawood for this.
0:47:25.330 --> 0:47:27.630
Jasmine Tang
Uh, Yeah, play organization.
0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:30.820
Jasmine Tang
This part have not to show the scope as well.
0:47:30.890 --> 0:47:35.180
Jasmine Tang
This is the new this is a different features in office zero.
0:47:35.250 --> 0:47:42.920
Jasmine Tang
They don't have something like Ryan in Keycloak, but there's something organizations they call organizations.
0:47:42.990 --> 0:47:46.130
Jasmine Tang
So yes, he could learn to the tenant, right?
0:47:49.10 --> 0:48:1.870
Jasmine Tang
Southside sounds like that laugh, but they are not, like, not everything can be controlled at all levels and so so it's still not very confirmed that whether we are going to use these features or not.
0:48:2.800 --> 0:48:6.100
Jasmine Tang
Uh makes it will have involved with the discussion first.
0:48:7.90 --> 0:48:14.950
Jasmine Tang
OK, if if you are not then so how how do we support between these users belongs to which tenant database connections are OK?
0:48:16.340 --> 0:48:20.140
Jasmine Tang
Is there any advantage you be at the ocelot organized here?
0:48:20.150 --> 0:48:37.430
Jasmine Tang
Anything we can do about, I think it can group like let's say this organization is organization, you can say which you enable which external database connection then you don't have to like do it for every single application that belongs to that tenant.
0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:40.80
Jasmine Tang
Sorry, because I montage if we do that, we can.
0:48:40.140 --> 0:48:42.860
Jasmine Tang
I mean the car operation maybe need to manage it.
0:48:44.200 --> 0:48:58.120
Jasmine Tang
Say example are the the the sandy do want to use our software ID it is that helpful if you have this it's disabled entire organization not really not really then then why they have these features.
0:48:59.880 --> 0:49:3.370
Jasmine Tang
Uh, like, complain space?
0:49:3.520 --> 0:49:5.40
Jasmine Tang
They need two layer, right?
0:49:5.120 --> 0:49:10.100
Jasmine Tang
They said the food for because organization to wait, who use it are that you have two options.
0:49:10.480 --> 0:49:18.690
Jasmine Tang
You can say you choose the organization ID first, but then only you you look in the other way is you log in.
0:49:18.740 --> 0:49:21.310
Jasmine Tang
Ohh, assigned to two organization.
0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:36.860
Jasmine Tang
Then you choose you want to log into which organizations so that the combined case and is it some group of people are they are using school hospital as an example, so they might need to access to two different schools and some group of user.
0:49:36.870 --> 0:49:40.320
Jasmine Tang
They can only access to one, maybe for the.
0:49:47.220 --> 0:49:48.350
Jasmine Tang
And Lee, he can't.
0:49:48.360 --> 0:49:55.20
Jasmine Tang
Actually, I think as people product really let's say let's say let's say about 1 user wanted to assess the two two different school.
0:49:55.180 --> 0:49:56.810
Jasmine Tang
So each school is two different.
0:49:59.720 --> 0:50:6.270
Jasmine Tang
Yes, we don't have a concept of like 1 user belongs to two that I'm right right now four for our use case.
0:50:6.280 --> 0:50:10.850
Jasmine Tang
No, but for complaints, they seems like they need that for certain group of users.
0:50:10.900 --> 0:50:27.290
Jasmine Tang
It said difficult if we don't have this and then we want to enhance later because we knew patching back to at any existing data with the tenant that we need to push it back then in the organization level you are just enabling which conditions, OK, I think we should do that.
0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:35.630
Jasmine Tang
But you will override and let's say you you enable that then the same thing and application level will be overwritten.
0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:36.420
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:50:36.490 --> 0:50:37.80
Jasmine Tang
But it's good to know.
0:50:45.550 --> 0:50:51.410
Jasmine Tang
So the create organizations like Infinite then will be against just called one API.
0:50:53.420 --> 0:50:57.350
Jasmine Tang
Wiki and then assign the data connection to the.
0:50:57.960 --> 0:50:59.770
Jasmine Tang
Let let let's say cloud operation.
0:50:59.780 --> 0:51:9.880
Jasmine Tang
They want to maintain the the things that be a lot easier if they have organization type in user so they can fill the organization or something that give you sample.
0:51:9.890 --> 0:51:10.600
Jasmine Tang
I think we should do it.
0:51:11.370 --> 0:51:12.530
Jasmine Tang
If it's not, then then only.
0:51:16.900 --> 0:51:17.820
Jasmine Tang
Then I think we leave it.
0:51:17.830 --> 0:51:18.250
Jasmine Tang
Leave it.
0:51:18.260 --> 0:51:19.600
Jasmine Tang
Leave it there for no, for now.
0:51:22.570 --> 0:51:34.600
Jasmine Tang
No, I think anything on 1st, I mean not only do do we love you the way unless something we need love because I know there's a good features there but but it doesn't look like we need there.
0:51:37.270 --> 0:51:39.470
Jasmine Tang
It's any specific reason you proposed this?
0:51:40.880 --> 0:51:45.870
Jasmine Tang
I propose that the music, because complaints they say they are, you worry about the scenario.
0:51:45.880 --> 0:51:49.880
Jasmine Tang
Access to view their recording, we decided to evaluate on the features.
0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:55.560
Jasmine Tang
I think we first first combined, so you also another question.
0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:57.380
Jasmine Tang
So you might not know E no.
0:51:57.390 --> 0:52:2.840
Jasmine Tang
If you look at the, there's a few more questions, but understand how much it is that very complicated.
0:52:2.850 --> 0:52:13.720
Jasmine Tang
If you do like the they they feel to be some, because if we roll out to the 1000 organization really 1010 and then after that we don't have, then we need to patch it back.
0:52:13.970 --> 0:52:15.160
Jasmine Tang
So that's why I ask all this.
0:52:14.650 --> 0:52:20.870
SueAnn See
But actually we don't know whether Devon way of Central Place, where you have this scenario, we don't know.
0:52:23.860 --> 0:52:29.250
Jasmine Tang
Uh PC view build headphone set of 1.
0:52:29.260 --> 0:52:44.90
Jasmine Tang
User accessing multiple of them but they have different authentication provider, so that's mean the same user can log into different, so there's one for that.
0:52:44.100 --> 0:52:48.820
Jasmine Tang
I can have multiple multiple SSO, so I can still OK you want me there?
0:52:48.830 --> 0:52:49.120
Jasmine Tang
I don't know.
0:52:57.240 --> 0:53:1.230
Jasmine Tang
After the discussion with you have any clearer nomination?
0:53:1.240 --> 0:53:3.600
Jasmine Tang
I will update you guys have better to use this one.
0:53:6.590 --> 0:53:8.110
Jasmine Tang
So now it's like crap.
0:53:10.710 --> 0:53:15.90
Jasmine Tang
The global world #9 there are different way of handling the database.
0:53:15.150 --> 0:53:20.930
Jasmine Tang
So it's either we put everything under one database or one customer one database is so also something haven't decided.
0:53:21.950 --> 0:53:32.640
Jasmine Tang
So if they say the direction is all customer sharing one database, then the UI item number 9 will no longer need the impression you will move to the offer visa.
0:53:33.620 --> 0:53:40.40
Jasmine Tang
OK, even if yes, shouldn't be this this job done by the teams.
0:53:41.110 --> 0:53:41.370
Jasmine Tang
Bye bye.
0:53:43.60 --> 0:53:44.70
Jasmine Tang
And the also visa.
0:53:44.200 --> 0:53:45.410
Jasmine Tang
Ohh need to call.
0:53:45.420 --> 0:53:48.590
Jasmine Tang
This is calling the the services OK.
0:53:48.640 --> 0:54:2.90
Jasmine Tang
I I don't understand why the credit database storing the customer is is part of the platform service term because implicit the password complexity right is set at the database level.
0:54:2.300 --> 0:54:7.690
Jasmine Tang
So it basically the requirement is every customer should allow to have their own password complexity.
0:54:8.100 --> 0:54:13.550
Jasmine Tang
Then in that case we need to do it in platform service, because only when you're on board a user.
0:54:14.240 --> 0:54:14.410
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:54:14.420 --> 0:54:16.560
Jasmine Tang
And what customer you create the connection?
0:54:16.650 --> 0:54:18.240
Jasmine Tang
Then you define the complexity, then.
0:54:18.550 --> 0:54:19.180
Jasmine Tang
OK.
0:54:19.270 --> 0:54:22.560
Jasmine Tang
So on the authentication service, do we need to do any work?
0:54:23.810 --> 0:54:25.520
Jasmine Tang
Or just order was done by you.
0:54:26.150 --> 0:54:29.560
Jasmine Tang
If if every customer has their own database, thing is done here.
0:54:29.800 --> 0:54:41.170
Jasmine Tang
If they say we say all customers share one database, then the authentication service has to pre create a database first, then only platform service can call the API to add user to database.
0:54:42.220 --> 0:54:43.890
Jasmine Tang
Ohh OK alright.
0:54:43.900 --> 0:54:56.980
Jasmine Tang
I just very curious that sorry I I I have a I just wake curious why the job is part of the platform service not the service even regardless we create multiple database or create a single one.
0:54:58.970 --> 0:55:2.660
Jasmine Tang
We cannot pre create we we wouldn't off service.
0:55:2.670 --> 0:55:7.480
Jasmine Tang
I wouldn't know when on which customer is going to buy or for that month.
0:55:7.490 --> 0:55:11.40
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, that's actually I I starting like personal service.
0:55:11.190 --> 0:55:13.960
Jasmine Tang
They will call one API in the OR service they be done.
0:55:13.970 --> 0:55:19.520
Jasmine Tang
The our service will create the No no, not all service performed service call directly to all zero API.
0:55:20.130 --> 0:55:21.620
Jasmine Tang
We don't have to create another layer.
0:55:21.630 --> 0:55:22.400
Jasmine Tang
That's OK.
0:55:22.410 --> 0:55:23.680
Jasmine Tang
That's OK, that's OK.
0:55:24.700 --> 0:55:25.910
Jasmine Tang
OK, then I think email also.
0:55:25.290 --> 0:55:27.70
Eric Wong
Uh, question question for me.
0:55:27.80 --> 0:55:34.740
Eric Wong
I've been so if imagine if we are not using each customer or each tenant having a single DB right?
0:55:34.810 --> 0:55:39.170
Eric Wong
I'm just curious how how do the tendency being handled for different users?
0:55:41.390 --> 0:55:43.230
Jasmine Tang
How do their tendency being handled?
0:55:43.930 --> 0:55:44.530
Eric Wong
Yeah.
0:55:44.540 --> 0:55:47.540
Eric Wong
As in which user belongs to which tenant.
0:55:47.680 --> 0:55:49.740
Eric Wong
In the I mean if everyone sharing the same DB.
0:55:51.220 --> 0:55:54.160
Jasmine Tang
They basically don't care or not they just authenticated.
0:55:58.960 --> 0:55:59.800
Eric Wong
Ohh.
0:55:54.170 --> 0:56:2.540
Jasmine Tang
Then depending on your client, if this redirected to the clients of even can feel the you can filter by tenant ID or something.
0:56:2.550 --> 0:56:4.440
Jasmine Tang
Still OK if you lump somewhere together.
0:56:8.790 --> 0:56:9.140
Eric Wong
Really, the.
0:56:4.450 --> 0:56:17.260
Jasmine Tang
I think most are difficult operation, very difficult to do maintenance on because they they are they are they are situation like this maybe this customer the one continue business with us we need them we need to remove that.
0:56:17.510 --> 0:56:21.630
Jasmine Tang
So we need to take care of some of this work, Keith.
0:56:20.990 --> 0:56:25.270
Eric Wong
So so can I say, can I say if if let's say everything is going to be one DB right?
0:56:25.770 --> 0:56:31.300
Eric Wong
Because like how key code works is like we detect the the user is from which tenant.
0:56:31.370 --> 0:56:36.900
Eric Wong
From there, we know which room it is, and from there we know which you are.
0:56:36.910 --> 0:56:37.370
Eric Wong
Authority.
0:56:37.380 --> 0:56:43.180
Eric Wong
You URL it is to point this user to hit to actually authenticate itself.
0:56:43.250 --> 0:56:48.600
Eric Wong
So in this case, can I assume that every user will have the same authority URL in a way?
0:56:49.630 --> 0:56:49.980
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
0:56:51.110 --> 0:56:52.20
Eric Wong
Ah, OK, OK.
0:56:49.990 --> 0:56:57.0
Jasmine Tang
Yes, Singh, then URL, but uh different application you just pass in different client ID.
0:56:58.110 --> 0:56:58.800
Eric Wong
OK.
0:56:58.840 --> 0:57:6.880
Eric Wong
OK, different application, but the application is more like for like product instances right in in a concept right?
0:57:7.520 --> 0:57:8.200
Jasmine Tang
This product.
0:57:7.470 --> 0:57:11.400
Eric Wong
So so it's nothing to do with the tenant, right?
0:57:11.410 --> 0:57:13.30
Eric Wong
So, OK, OK.
0:57:14.310 --> 0:57:14.770
Eric Wong
Right. Thanks.
0:57:28.890 --> 0:57:30.450
Jasmine Tang
For the fun, you know now, correct.
0:57:30.460 --> 0:57:31.520
Jasmine Tang
That's what you lose.
0:57:31.570 --> 0:57:32.110
Jasmine Tang
Yeah. OK.
0:57:37.790 --> 0:57:38.170
Jasmine Tang
Right.
0:57:42.230 --> 0:57:57.120
Jasmine Tang
This one is to create the product in that if the like client level in keycloak so when be on board uh again I think Son also there are two options do they haven't decided to go for which options because we can.
0:57:59.780 --> 0:58:4.110
Jasmine Tang
Like for example if the multi tenant, multi tenant products, right?
0:58:4.410 --> 0:58:30.800
Jasmine Tang
So there is an option to say only 111 client created at all zero and we can still support multi tenant or there is another options that every customers have one client in off 0 just like how we use key code people is a bit different because we put it under a Yang to separate by the customer.
0:58:31.280 --> 0:58:34.810
Jasmine Tang
But for all zero, there's no real concept.
0:58:35.150 --> 0:58:40.230
Jasmine Tang
So with one application and because they support wild card they you can also.
0:58:42.290 --> 0:58:50.900
Jasmine Tang
Make it like putting the organization name dynamically into the copy URL at they say for outright.
0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:55.470
Jasmine Tang
How they do the multi tenancy is by using the sub domain to differentiate.
0:58:55.480 --> 0:58:57.970
Jasmine Tang
This is coming from which customer right?
0:58:57.980 --> 0:58:59.410
Jasmine Tang
So all zero.
0:58:59.420 --> 0:59:7.680
Jasmine Tang
If they say we use the subdomain as an organization name, then we can only have one client, but the.
0:59:9.800 --> 0:59:10.510
Jasmine Tang
Subdomain.
0:59:10.520 --> 0:59:13.770
Jasmine Tang
Use it as a copy URL, then it can work already.
0:59:15.350 --> 0:59:22.540
Jasmine Tang
So we have an option to create only one client for product but not product instance.
0:59:27.40 --> 0:59:28.870
Jasmine Tang
OK, So what we are not there.
0:59:30.140 --> 0:59:39.940
Jasmine Tang
No one client is not not really is a product instance in the KEYCLOAK world is a product instance, one product instance, one client.
0:59:41.290 --> 0:59:42.650
Jasmine Tang
My client and keycloak right.
0:59:46.220 --> 0:59:56.100
Jasmine Tang
Because in key code we go to group, drop the customer by the young but in all zero we can we we cannot be group customer.
0:59:59.280 --> 1:0:5.690
Jasmine Tang
No, because in in Keycloak right, every customer they their authority server you are will be different because of the.
1:0:6.50 --> 1:0:6.720
Jasmine Tang
But in all zero.
1:0:8.670 --> 1:0:10.720
Jasmine Tang
We only have one one authority server.
1:0:10.730 --> 1:0:18.230
Jasmine Tang
You out over time for all the time for all the products you know for all the products.
1:0:20.420 --> 1:0:24.500
Jasmine Tang
So this this is going to be better that.
1:0:20.530 --> 1:0:25.620
Eric Wong
Yes, in key in Kiko is actually.
1:0:26.870 --> 1:0:27.840
Eric Wong
Uh.
1:0:28.50 --> 1:0:32.980
Eric Wong
Even even the Home SBA itself have its own client.
1:0:33.690 --> 1:0:38.940
Eric Wong
The mobile have its own client and individual product instance has own client as well. Yep.
1:0:39.90 --> 1:0:39.420
Jasmine Tang
Yes.
1:0:39.630 --> 1:0:44.910
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, but in in keycloak they say we have two customer by app.
1:0:47.830 --> 1:0:47.980
Eric Wong
Yes.
1:0:49.970 --> 1:0:50.750
Eric Wong
Yes, correct.
1:0:50.830 --> 1:0:51.240
Eric Wong
Correct, yes.
1:0:45.580 --> 1:0:54.720
Jasmine Tang
Then we will have two young and two products I buy off so we can have an option to say we only have one.
1:1:0.40 --> 1:1:0.320
Eric Wong
Uh-huh.
1:0:56.450 --> 1:1:0.740
Jasmine Tang
One uh they call applications are applications.
1:1:0.980 --> 1:1:3.240
Jasmine Tang
Zero is the client in Keycloak.
1:1:5.240 --> 1:1:5.800
Eric Wong
Right.
1:1:5.100 --> 1:1:8.630
Jasmine Tang
So if he want application, he also work.
1:1:8.780 --> 1:1:12.950
Jasmine Tang
We create two different application for two different customer with the same product.
1:1:12.960 --> 1:1:13.650
Jasmine Tang
It also works.
1:1:15.480 --> 1:1:16.10
Jasmine Tang
Let's see.
1:1:15.270 --> 1:1:18.620
Eric Wong
Right then, then what is the deliberation on direct site?
1:1:18.630 --> 1:1:20.520
Eric Wong
And just curious, there must be something cost.
1:1:23.100 --> 1:1:27.980
Jasmine Tang
I think few things are how complex to manage and then do we have other implications or not?
1:1:41.510 --> 1:1:41.790
Eric Wong
Hmm.
1:1:27.990 --> 1:1:43.50
Jasmine Tang
Because when Duraid was suggesting this, then if we go for one application that then we go to think of change how the way to implement or change will be differently because we were detecting by applications to decide which product influence is it.
1:1:43.760 --> 1:1:43.960
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
1:1:43.460 --> 1:1:53.60
Jasmine Tang
So if we if we don't, if we go for one applications, they will have to find a different way to identify that this login is coming from which customer.
1:1:53.660 --> 1:1:54.300
Eric Wong
Right. OK.
1:1:56.590 --> 1:1:59.780
Jasmine Tang
It sounds like you need to one by one of other.
1:1:59.790 --> 1:2:3.120
Jasmine Tang
You cannot like lump sum together really.
1:2:3.250 --> 1:2:4.580
Jasmine Tang
I also think 1 by 1.
1:2:4.590 --> 1:2:10.430
Jasmine Tang
Easier to manage it, but then you will end up with lots of applications in the in the and then the thing that you know.
1:2:10.810 --> 1:2:16.230
Jasmine Tang
But if if you don't do that, then there's no way to differentiate really, right?
1:2:16.290 --> 1:2:18.970
Jasmine Tang
You cannot be detected by the organization name.
1:2:19.500 --> 1:2:22.10
Jasmine Tang
That means you go to use together with the organization features.
1:2:23.710 --> 1:2:24.110
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:2:25.530 --> 1:2:31.440
Jasmine Tang
So we should organization, not product organizations, denoma.
1:2:31.450 --> 1:2:36.650
Jasmine Tang
So this mean E if you don't implement this, can we know which product not not?
1:2:36.660 --> 1:2:46.210
Jasmine Tang
I mean which tenant which product that's the can because it uh one of the features are easy, they can detect you by your domain email domain.
1:2:46.680 --> 1:2:52.750
Jasmine Tang
They say when you log in ideagen.com right then it's HRDC features or something like the HID features.
1:2:52.980 --> 1:2:57.90
Jasmine Tang
So from that then they can find you belongs to which organizations.
1:2:57.540 --> 1:2:58.210
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:2:58.460 --> 1:3:3.760
Jasmine Tang
OK, which organization looks OK because organization how about which product?
1:3:4.220 --> 1:3:5.860
Jasmine Tang
Which product is made in the client ID?
1:3:8.100 --> 1:3:9.820
Jasmine Tang
And E OK.
1:3:9.830 --> 1:3:15.280
Jasmine Tang
Please point I know important for this because user title then not Type 2 product, right?
1:3:15.330 --> 1:3:21.870
Jasmine Tang
Uh, still important, because if the same user has access to two different products, there is no way.
1:3:22.280 --> 1:3:24.510
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, that is coming from concess.
1:3:25.510 --> 1:3:27.320
Jasmine Tang
What do we need to give?
1:3:27.330 --> 1:3:31.840
Jasmine Tang
We know that then this cannot, cannot, cannot see the different area is that.
1:3:31.910 --> 1:3:32.660
Jasmine Tang
Is that crucial?
1:3:32.670 --> 1:3:33.230
Jasmine Tang
Is that crucial?
1:3:34.690 --> 1:3:38.70
Jasmine Tang
Crucial to decide that otherwise it's difficult for us to proceed.
1:3:39.50 --> 1:3:42.650
Jasmine Tang
So about this area, is there any further conversation?
1:3:42.660 --> 1:3:46.850
Jasmine Tang
We do this to there's a Duraid you need another 2-3 hours long discussions.
1:3:48.870 --> 1:3:51.740
Jasmine Tang
Put that OK did you mention schedule?
1:3:51.750 --> 1:3:57.760
Jasmine Tang
With him this week, you think he's full one and next week also he will be full.
1:3:57.900 --> 1:3:59.720
Jasmine Tang
Uh, I think this week.
1:3:59.810 --> 1:4:7.60
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I think besides that also, OK, now my I think these are still got time a bit we can do later we start some of the work at the top.
1:4:7.130 --> 1:4:7.660
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:4:8.130 --> 1:4:8.480
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:4:8.490 --> 1:4:18.720
Jasmine Tang
I think on the discussion itself also need to confirm with you right on the the UI that he and TCP but for for the create client that I think still cannot run away equal to do it in platform.
1:4:19.700 --> 1:4:38.410
Jasmine Tang
One way it does if we go for one one product, one client and then that means when you create the product you go to call the API to create the client at the application and if you go for every customers 11 application site then that means whenever you create a product instance you call the API.
1:4:40.170 --> 1:4:44.80
Jasmine Tang
So no matter what you got to handle it, platform is all set.
1:4:46.10 --> 1:4:47.0
Jasmine Tang
Bring which possessed.
1:4:47.10 --> 1:4:48.220
Jasmine Tang
Then you call the API log.
1:4:48.310 --> 1:4:49.760
Jasmine Tang
Probably different process of if.
1:4:50.130 --> 1:4:51.340
Jasmine Tang
If you go for a different approach.
1:4:52.220 --> 1:5:4.830
Eric Wong
So can that can I rephrase so if it's a if we're going by the route of each particular product instance as a single app on all zero.
1:5:4.840 --> 1:5:8.130
Eric Wong
So where we create a product instance, we need to create the app itself, right?
1:5:9.140 --> 1:5:9.280
Jasmine Tang
Yes.
1:5:10.110 --> 1:5:18.260
Eric Wong
And then if we go by each Hannon as an app itself, as each client they are each each customer.
1:5:18.370 --> 1:5:21.350
Eric Wong
So in that case, when we create a tenant, we need to create that.
1:5:19.10 --> 1:5:23.500
Jasmine Tang
No, not but each customer each product.
1:5:25.830 --> 1:5:26.900
Jasmine Tang
But at least the app.
1:5:24.480 --> 1:5:27.450
Eric Wong
Each product or each product.
1:5:27.460 --> 1:5:27.770
Eric Wong
OK.
1:5:27.780 --> 1:5:28.470
Eric Wong
OK.
1:5:29.20 --> 1:5:29.920
Eric Wong
Or each product.
1:5:31.620 --> 1:5:32.260
Eric Wong
Uh.
1:5:33.730 --> 1:5:35.20
Jasmine Tang
You have a new extent right?
1:5:36.250 --> 1:5:36.710
Jasmine Tang
The version.
1:5:33.530 --> 1:5:54.140
Eric Wong
How the product concept where we have API to create we have API to create product but in the product also have different version of product so each version OK each product have different versions and each product instance is tied to a specific version of a product.
1:5:57.910 --> 1:5:59.200
Eric Wong
At least that's that's what it is now.
1:6:2.600 --> 1:6:4.180
Eric Wong
Ah, yes, yes.
1:6:0.330 --> 1:6:6.80
Jasmine Tang
This on the platform service level, but what what in the office level that it's just a mess.
1:6:5.400 --> 1:6:10.490
Eric Wong
So that's why how how this will tie back to each product when there's I'm trying to ask.
1:6:11.150 --> 1:6:12.840
Eric Wong
Uh, ping ping.
1:6:12.850 --> 1:6:21.840
Eric Wong
How how would this tie back to the to the each app when she mentioned about creating each product like art, a product having a single app?
1:6:25.370 --> 1:6:28.650
Jasmine Tang
As a product, having a single app, how does it type?
1:6:28.220 --> 1:6:30.190
Eric Wong
App, yeah.
1:6:32.50 --> 1:6:34.170
Jasmine Tang
Does it have X2 to what?
1:6:34.30 --> 1:6:34.990
Eric Wong
So each product instance.
1:6:37.70 --> 1:6:39.610
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, you don't have it to product instance anymore.
1:6:39.620 --> 1:6:44.340
Jasmine Tang
In that case, no more, no more multiple product is.
1:6:44.390 --> 1:6:47.900
Jasmine Tang
I think it's a click the different client.
1:6:47.910 --> 1:7:3.130
Jasmine Tang
OK, currently we are have different product instance with different client but in off we have uh the different product instance with the same product but using the same client in in off 0.
1:7:3.720 --> 1:7:10.300
Jasmine Tang
So this is what pimping like a little maintain multiple version for the same products.
1:7:10.700 --> 1:7:16.310
Jasmine Tang
Then I would imagine in all you know your create as two different applications of.
1:7:16.980 --> 1:7:17.840
Eric Wong
Right. OK.
1:7:17.140 --> 1:7:21.760
Jasmine Tang
Then it each that will be identified by the client ID for that application.
1:7:24.820 --> 1:7:25.520
Eric Wong
Right. OK.
1:7:26.500 --> 1:7:32.140
Eric Wong
Well, I think I think the session you're gonna have this will give us a better picture in the sense because I'm I was one.
1:7:32.150 --> 1:7:33.260
Eric Wong
I'm trying to visualize this.
1:7:33.350 --> 1:7:44.660
Eric Wong
How differ is off 0 works with how Keycloak working now so that we can you know know what's the gap and in scenario like create product instance in scenario like create tenant and so on.
1:7:44.730 --> 1:7:46.380
Eric Wong
How would this all tied together?
1:7:46.430 --> 1:7:48.90
Eric Wong
Yeah, I think that that will help us.
1:7:50.980 --> 1:7:52.370
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, nothing would last.
1:7:52.380 --> 1:7:56.410
Jasmine Tang
Also, the cops zero when we try to create a new tenant.
1:7:56.530 --> 1:8:2.800
Jasmine Tang
What this means, creating a new organization or creating a new client?
1:8:2.810 --> 1:8:3.10
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:8:3.20 --> 1:8:6.450
Jasmine Tang
If you go for organization label then it's creating a new organizations.
1:8:6.520 --> 1:8:15.970
Jasmine Tang
If you go, if you don't use organization features, then depending other we separate one custom one database per customer or not.
1:8:16.400 --> 1:8:26.560
Jasmine Tang
So if one database server, then when you create a tenant you create one database, if no then basically nothing that you need to do for the tenant level.
1:8:28.670 --> 1:8:30.760
Jasmine Tang
I mean Carissa, ohh, you don't mind?
1:8:30.770 --> 1:8:33.930
Jasmine Tang
It is island and there must be a reason why I think we need to find out a bit.
1:8:35.440 --> 1:8:36.850
Jasmine Tang
Did you ask matter?
1:8:37.340 --> 1:8:39.70
Jasmine Tang
I know what the the the why?
1:8:39.80 --> 1:8:40.920
Jasmine Tang
What was the usage of this organization?
1:8:40.930 --> 1:8:44.310
Jasmine Tang
And because it looks like there's a lot duplicate things around.
1:8:47.310 --> 1:8:48.660
Jasmine Tang
There must be some some reason.
1:8:52.220 --> 1:8:52.830
Jasmine Tang
OK, all good.
1:8:53.100 --> 1:8:54.750
Jasmine Tang
OK, they told me.
1:8:54.800 --> 1:8:57.330
Jasmine Tang
Maybe they want you still access to two, right?
1:8:58.240 --> 1:8:58.800
Jasmine Tang
How about that?
1:9:4.0 --> 1:9:5.290
Jasmine Tang
How about the client one?
1:9:5.340 --> 1:9:8.290
Jasmine Tang
What was the purpose with the client?
1:9:8.810 --> 1:9:10.650
Jasmine Tang
The client is OK.
1:9:12.610 --> 1:9:19.540
Jasmine Tang
Uh, that the the the application client here is is the one that will define it.
1:9:19.550 --> 1:9:20.550
Jasmine Tang
It will generate those.
1:9:22.310 --> 1:9:24.210
Jasmine Tang
Idea the OK.
1:9:24.360 --> 1:9:27.870
Jasmine Tang
The stuff about this, the idea, the ID will be used to generate a token.
1:9:28.780 --> 1:9:29.130
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:9:29.140 --> 1:9:34.820
Jasmine Tang
OK, OK, alongside Dusi client cannot run away.
1:9:35.320 --> 1:9:36.770
Jasmine Tang
OK, definitely we need.
1:9:36.840 --> 1:9:43.720
Jasmine Tang
We need one is either we create one client per product instance or one client per product.
1:9:44.910 --> 1:9:52.100
Jasmine Tang
One comment because one product can have many product instance, I think we need to put instead.
1:9:52.470 --> 1:9:54.950
Jasmine Tang
Maybe due to security reason, right?
1:9:57.420 --> 1:10:9.870
Jasmine Tang
I also think they say more detail more better instead of like, yeah everyone share the same thing, but we do during the time Duraid ask this is because we don't know whether there is a limitation of application for the tenant.
1:10:9.880 --> 1:10:10.790
Jasmine Tang
Is it all zero?
1:10:10.800 --> 1:10:14.530
Jasmine Tang
Or how about the database I go with the database on?
1:10:14.540 --> 1:10:20.60
Jasmine Tang
Is there any performance thing if we queue hey we won you either send it always.
1:10:20.70 --> 1:10:21.240
Jasmine Tang
I feel like they could be.
1:10:21.450 --> 1:10:23.30
Jasmine Tang
They know that they.
1:10:23.220 --> 1:10:23.880
Jasmine Tang
No, no, no.
1:10:25.550 --> 1:10:26.840
Jasmine Tang
In like this are better.
1:10:26.850 --> 1:10:34.600
Jasmine Tang
We have one customer, 11B, but there's something to do it and see how it's easier to manage.
1:10:34.610 --> 1:10:37.770
Jasmine Tang
Like they say, the customer decided not to use it.
1:10:37.780 --> 1:10:40.200
Jasmine Tang
Then we just delete their connection to.
1:10:40.830 --> 1:10:42.780
Jasmine Tang
You got to look through and then find which you.
1:10:42.230 --> 1:10:44.380
Eric Wong
I I think 1 area we need to look at it.
1:10:44.390 --> 1:10:54.990
Eric Wong
So I'm not sure whether this case a A makes sense or not, but there are customer which I understand that there one that that are to be segregated from other organization so.
1:10:54.380 --> 1:10:55.570
Jasmine Tang
But to good?
1:10:55.620 --> 1:10:56.10
Jasmine Tang
Goodbye.
1:10:56.20 --> 1:10:56.740
Jasmine Tang
Goodbye. Goodbye.
1:10:56.880 --> 1:10:57.40
Eric Wong
Yeah.
1:10:58.670 --> 1:11:6.50
Jasmine Tang
Just we, we will, we will have the requirement to say every customer allowed to set their own password complexity, right?
1:11:6.890 --> 1:11:14.980
Jasmine Tang
So if you have that, then we we we got to make every customer have their own DVR because it's decided at that level.
1:11:15.330 --> 1:11:16.280
Jasmine Tang
OK, OK.
1:11:16.450 --> 1:11:16.700
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:11:16.710 --> 1:11:18.580
Jasmine Tang
I think then negotiate with today.
1:11:18.590 --> 1:11:22.340
Jasmine Tang
Maybe you can tell him about our requirement here then.
1:11:22.350 --> 1:11:33.470
Jasmine Tang
So he can and leave it, but that is a good point, because then linked one the if it's between the one database and multiple.
1:11:35.210 --> 1:11:40.200
Jasmine Tang
Yes, I think, yeah, to talk about one, this one is for multitenancy.
1:11:40.210 --> 1:11:42.830
Jasmine Tang
Another one is for the single tenancy for each instance.
1:11:44.840 --> 1:11:47.390
Jasmine Tang
So far you start early, that's.
1:11:49.170 --> 1:11:49.540
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:11:49.550 --> 1:11:52.260
Jasmine Tang
And then and then the assigned identity provider.
1:11:52.270 --> 1:11:55.440
Jasmine Tang
I also, depending on whether we're using organization.
1:11:55.490 --> 1:11:58.880
Jasmine Tang
If you use then that assignment will be done at the organization level.
1:11:59.210 --> 1:12:2.620
Jasmine Tang
If you don't, then that assignment will be done at the application level.
1:12:3.730 --> 1:12:6.210
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, there's a diagram there.
1:12:6.400 --> 1:12:11.860
Jasmine Tang
Jasmine, look at the link there and there's a degraded 3.
1:12:11.870 --> 1:12:20.470
Jasmine Tang
My feeling is like inclue tie back to then and no because our user very much is big problem you know.
1:12:22.340 --> 1:12:23.350
Jasmine Tang
But this is the.
1:12:23.440 --> 1:12:23.560
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:12:23.880 --> 1:12:29.270
Jasmine Tang
A A single database with multiple the paper.
1:12:29.960 --> 1:12:32.310
Jasmine Tang
Uh, I'm gonna zation, I believe.
1:12:32.320 --> 1:12:32.410
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:12:33.420 --> 1:12:38.80
Jasmine Tang
So there's only one database connection and there will be one login page.
1:12:40.40 --> 1:12:45.570
Jasmine Tang
Or customers for all the customer think uh scrolling down, scrolling down there will be.
1:12:48.600 --> 1:12:51.520
Jasmine Tang
Or yeah, so this is the multiple.
1:12:53.580 --> 1:12:55.950
Jasmine Tang
Uh, we thought instance of database.
1:12:58.360 --> 1:13:1.930
Jasmine Tang
Multiple tenant for each single tenant instance.
1:13:1.940 --> 1:13:2.80
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:13:2.980 --> 1:13:4.910
Jasmine Tang
So there will be multiple instance for this case.
1:13:7.120 --> 1:13:9.750
Jasmine Tang
And this instant will have one database connection.
1:13:13.930 --> 1:13:14.940
Jasmine Tang
Please have two model.
1:13:22.990 --> 1:13:23.820
Jasmine Tang
Happens right?
1:13:23.830 --> 1:13:28.450
Jasmine Tang
Meaning that there's no concept of RAM or no, no, there's no.
1:13:28.820 --> 1:13:30.40
Jasmine Tang
Become confusing.
1:13:30.50 --> 1:13:30.700
Jasmine Tang
Confusing, right?
1:13:30.710 --> 1:13:31.920
Jasmine Tang
Yeah. Confusing.
1:13:31.930 --> 1:13:33.10
Jasmine Tang
So they're not be some more.
1:13:33.720 --> 1:13:34.430
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, yeah.
1:13:50.10 --> 1:13:58.350
Jasmine Tang
So this one this knowledge and I think yeah, go into the per product instances personally.
1:13:58.360 --> 1:13:58.860
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, right.
1:13:58.870 --> 1:13:59.810
Jasmine Tang
But that's also like that.
1:14:0.200 --> 1:14:3.550
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I think you have to confirm check deviancy.
1:14:4.290 --> 1:14:5.130
Jasmine Tang
They yeah.
1:14:5.140 --> 1:14:10.70
Jasmine Tang
So that's what I was saying that under these sections are based in assign identity provider item.
1:14:10.960 --> 1:14:18.550
Jasmine Tang
So this one also is not sure whether it's done here or it's done at the organization level depending whether we are using the organization features or not.
1:14:21.190 --> 1:14:26.430
Jasmine Tang
So in this we will, but the government do it first.
1:14:28.180 --> 1:14:29.340
Jasmine Tang
The the discussion.
1:14:38.730 --> 1:14:41.280
Jasmine Tang
That's a nice home, I.
1:14:45.920 --> 1:14:52.270
Jasmine Tang
Not be the book all zeroman this this particular UI and this is going People right?
1:14:52.280 --> 1:14:56.290
Jasmine Tang
This is more on the application platform platform 7.
1:14:58.210 --> 1:15:2.640
Jasmine Tang
The mice that you know, it's not me doing calling door.
1:15:2.690 --> 1:15:4.310
Jasmine Tang
Sorry, I just think it would take.
1:15:4.590 --> 1:15:6.690
Jasmine Tang
Ohh OK, starting to do it.
1:15:6.700 --> 1:15:9.280
Jasmine Tang
The login pitch to customize and logging pitching.
1:15:9.450 --> 1:15:19.30
Jasmine Tang
OK, think of people is that every tenant you, you can define cognito is more like key code whether you can like 1 customer one realm like this one customer 1 user two.
1:15:19.410 --> 1:15:20.960
Jasmine Tang
Ohh of zero.
1:15:21.30 --> 1:15:22.270
Jasmine Tang
When I read on that right.
1:15:22.350 --> 1:15:27.600
Jasmine Tang
So depends on which the multitenancy talk.
1:15:27.770 --> 1:15:39.690
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, let's say you are choosing the single database for multiple customer, then only once locking page could be, yeah Kathy can be configured.
1:15:40.30 --> 1:15:44.960
Jasmine Tang
Ohh so there there won't be having a per customer for long.
1:15:45.470 --> 1:15:54.930
Jasmine Tang
If they say you want to per customer login page then you will you will you choose the second option which is the multiple instance with multiple customer.
1:15:55.960 --> 1:16:3.340
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I mean want to have their own individual knowing benchmarks, separate database, separate database, yes.
1:16:3.350 --> 1:16:17.120
Jasmine Tang
Then mostly, we still stick to them because the some sometime organization they want to have their own local appearing there in the but the customization because we need to customize that UI that that one is handled at the organization level.
1:16:17.410 --> 1:16:21.320
Jasmine Tang
But if you do, if you go for the UI customizations then it will override.
1:16:23.110 --> 1:16:26.510
Jasmine Tang
OK, so so so still can be done that.
1:16:27.540 --> 1:16:27.920
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:16:27.980 --> 1:16:28.970
Jasmine Tang
What do you mean by that?
1:16:29.260 --> 1:16:29.810
Jasmine Tang
Is it there?
1:16:30.750 --> 1:16:32.460
Jasmine Tang
Ohh 0 have their own tenant.
1:16:33.680 --> 1:16:37.300
Jasmine Tang
The cannon is like Keycode product instance that the whole key code.
1:16:39.400 --> 1:16:41.110
Jasmine Tang
The whole key cooked the Anna.
1:16:41.320 --> 1:16:45.330
Jasmine Tang
OK, so still one tenant, they they call it a tenant.
1:16:45.420 --> 1:16:46.830
Jasmine Tang
OK, OK, OK.
1:16:46.840 --> 1:16:58.860
Jasmine Tang
So what they can do is in one account right they can have you can create multiple tenant at different region and under the same tenant you can choose production the one tenant.
1:16:59.220 --> 1:17:4.400
Jasmine Tang
When you choose when you create the tenant, you can choose whether this is a production tenant or this is a development tenant.
1:17:4.470 --> 1:17:5.0
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:17:5.670 --> 1:17:18.950
Jasmine Tang
So they also, yeah, they don't look like they wrote tenant is very different for our tenancy, very different, very different zero organization equivalent to our tenant tenant is like our key code instance.
1:17:19.10 --> 1:17:22.670
Jasmine Tang
You said one click OK only have 150 rounds, right?
1:17:22.840 --> 1:17:29.190
Jasmine Tang
So after 350, we go to spin up another key problem that is their Pennant.
1:17:29.370 --> 1:17:29.710
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:17:29.750 --> 1:17:31.170
Jasmine Tang
Then then how's the?
1:17:31.260 --> 1:17:31.540
Jasmine Tang
Where?
1:17:31.550 --> 1:17:37.10
Jasmine Tang
Where when we can customize the the login page, tenant level or OK.
1:17:37.220 --> 1:17:41.40
Jasmine Tang
But the reason we don't need we don't need to allow customer to customize their own logo.
1:17:42.810 --> 1:17:43.690
Jasmine Tang
I'm not sure we need to.
1:17:45.270 --> 1:17:46.300
Jasmine Tang
OK, OK.
1:17:47.180 --> 1:17:51.700
Jasmine Tang
You're currently we have this one single picture right for people.
1:17:51.870 --> 1:17:54.100
Jasmine Tang
So this is kind of like new feature.
1:18:5.900 --> 1:18:8.470
Jasmine Tang
Any other functions that I miss?
1:18:8.480 --> 1:18:9.300
Jasmine Tang
Are let's say.
1:18:12.680 --> 1:18:14.30
Jasmine Tang
If Wong service calling KEYCLOAK.
1:18:19.460 --> 1:18:19.830
Jasmine Tang
If you.
1:18:19.980 --> 1:18:20.440
Jasmine Tang
So yeah.
1:18:20.450 --> 1:18:21.660
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, just interrupt.
1:18:21.670 --> 1:18:27.260
Jasmine Tang
Still, if you don't allow people to customer or this locally now, why do we need to pay about password complexity?
1:18:28.560 --> 1:18:44.260
Jasmine Tang
Because we can have like 1 password complexity for those people who don't use SSO puzzle could basically is different that the the the log in the log in is like the color the logo welcome.
1:18:44.590 --> 1:18:46.610
Jasmine Tang
I just feel like we should.
1:18:46.790 --> 1:18:54.550
Jasmine Tang
We should put a standard internal apply the the the possible compulsive complexity, then either UI.
1:18:55.560 --> 1:19:0.350
Jasmine Tang
I think the puzzle convexity is like some company and they have their own policy.
1:19:0.360 --> 1:19:0.670
Jasmine Tang
One.
1:19:1.660 --> 1:19:4.240
Jasmine Tang
OK, so it doesn't reset one then the then.
1:19:6.790 --> 1:19:8.400
Jasmine Tang
Different company, different policy.
1:19:9.50 --> 1:19:14.180
Jasmine Tang
But I was thinking like this because if the company wants to have their own parser complicity, they should.
1:19:14.190 --> 1:19:20.810
Jasmine Tang
If they should integrate with their own active title, or so right is any data.
1:19:20.820 --> 1:19:24.20
Jasmine Tang
I have their owner and then they want they want their own.
1:19:24.300 --> 1:19:26.110
Jasmine Tang
Own personal complexity so.
1:19:28.410 --> 1:19:29.700
Jasmine Tang
He built A1.
1:19:29.750 --> 1:19:32.940
Jasmine Tang
He built something and also why don't just stick to one?
1:19:32.950 --> 1:19:38.620
Jasmine Tang
Maybe alone easier, but in the longer term for us, we need to manage so many different customers different.
1:19:40.20 --> 1:19:40.930
Jasmine Tang
I will also busy.
1:19:40.940 --> 1:19:44.930
Jasmine Tang
There's my general feeling that so so we can we can have like a few options.
1:19:44.940 --> 1:19:55.200
Jasmine Tang
So if you either have their own design of the apartment parcel complexity, we choose the most complex pattern, then if you don't want then you have to use your own SSO to integrate.
1:19:55.210 --> 1:19:56.140
Jasmine Tang
Then we don't need to hit that.
1:19:56.150 --> 1:19:59.50
Jasmine Tang
We all this customization, I feel they are.
1:19:59.120 --> 1:20:3.400
Jasmine Tang
I mean, I think from the future of the our Ideagen product.
1:20:6.990 --> 1:20:7.630
Jasmine Tang
Anything, yeah.
1:20:6.840 --> 1:20:11.360
Eric Wong
Do we need to customize the parcel complexity on all zero?
1:20:11.370 --> 1:20:12.90
Eric Wong
I thought it's supported.
1:20:14.740 --> 1:20:15.840
Jasmine Tang
A tower imported.
1:20:16.290 --> 1:20:17.300
Eric Wong
The Potter the potted.
1:20:16.60 --> 1:20:32.720
Jasmine Tang
What supported is is aborted, but it's set at the connection level, so it depends on our requirement that if they say, we say every customer need to have their own, uh, what's the complexity, right?
1:20:32.730 --> 1:20:36.490
Jasmine Tang
They miss every customer need to have their own database connection now.
1:20:38.370 --> 1:20:38.740
Eric Wong
Right.
1:20:38.750 --> 1:20:52.680
Eric Wong
So I think in that case the the bigger answer, the bigger question to answer is more about whether we want to have a each customer, their own DB to manage in the sense of like tenant so or realm.
1:20:52.690 --> 1:21:0.260
Eric Wong
So if that's the case, then I think it's OK to support the the password complexity in the sense otherwise we don't.
1:21:0.270 --> 1:21:5.760
Eric Wong
Because again, I think what Jack mentioned, so if let's say we're gonna build something in house.
1:21:6.90 --> 1:21:11.360
Eric Wong
Yeah, it's kind of complex to support more of these features, but if it's our boss from all zero, I think it's OK to use.
1:21:13.190 --> 1:21:22.680
Jasmine Tang
E and I don't think that, I mean I think we will see the Christopher did mention about like we can have like a standard of password complexity a few few choice.
1:21:23.170 --> 1:21:25.70
Jasmine Tang
So I think eventually for what?
1:21:25.80 --> 1:21:27.160
Jasmine Tang
Repent because cognito cannot support that.
1:21:27.450 --> 1:21:35.520
Jasmine Tang
So I think that discussion with Duraid was we make it simple, only fix that is because the so.
1:21:35.530 --> 1:21:37.300
Jasmine Tang
So the final one is fixed up.
1:21:37.610 --> 1:21:37.780
Jasmine Tang
No.
1:21:37.790 --> 1:21:40.60
Jasmine Tang
No, because right now, uh zero can support them.
1:21:40.70 --> 1:21:41.470
Jasmine Tang
You actually give me open.
1:21:44.560 --> 1:21:45.280
Jasmine Tang
I'd be concerned.
1:21:45.290 --> 1:21:47.300
Jasmine Tang
I don't longer terms or listing.
1:21:48.810 --> 1:21:49.780
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, long time.
1:21:49.830 --> 1:22:26.570
Jasmine Tang
Because it it they say you are talking about the long term long term maintenance like then if if we use only one database connection all customer sharing right then when customer living then we also have problem clearing their database mine the data OK if you go for one database one customer on that point is easier to manage be there we need to separate even then different database either for the same like tenas all for the data the customer they want to share that data along with this one maybe I can understand but I'm talking about this.
1:22:26.770 --> 1:22:29.460
Jasmine Tang
Password complexity I I don't.
1:22:29.470 --> 1:22:31.70
Jasmine Tang
I mean in this context, I don't.
1:22:31.920 --> 1:22:38.440
Jasmine Tang
Personally, I don't feel I just feel a bit like 2 too much thing too.
1:22:38.490 --> 1:22:42.140
Jasmine Tang
Making too flexible for the for the for the then the.
1:22:42.570 --> 1:22:43.720
Jasmine Tang
I mean, if you stick to that.
1:22:43.950 --> 1:22:44.340
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:22:44.350 --> 1:22:46.260
Jasmine Tang
I I just bring this topic up.
1:22:46.330 --> 1:22:51.580
Jasmine Tang
Maybe we should review again how we should build our next generation product.
1:22:51.690 --> 1:23:2.230
Jasmine Tang
Imagine I'll be marketer can beat market less to customize different parcel complexity, though there's only one they are parcel conversely and then you can say so to connect to it and you can do their own.
1:23:3.190 --> 1:23:8.920
Jasmine Tang
So then that's my that's my view as a as a product view.
1:23:12.990 --> 1:23:13.700
Jasmine Tang
But never.
1:23:13.710 --> 1:23:19.730
Jasmine Tang
I just maybe something to think about, but I was thinking we don't want support team to maintain or the 8.
1:23:19.740 --> 1:23:22.820
Jasmine Tang
How come my how come I cannot type this password then they need to maintain this.
1:23:22.950 --> 1:23:32.670
Jasmine Tang
So if you have one flat rules for all the authentication user that don't have access to one, once that rules the most complex parcels and complexity after that.
1:23:32.680 --> 1:23:42.130
Jasmine Tang
If you want to have your own customization own MFA, whatever, then you have to use your own to connect to all zero and then platform service.
1:23:42.140 --> 1:23:44.150
Jasmine Tang
Don't allow the features to update.
1:23:44.480 --> 1:23:48.900
Jasmine Tang
When you go in one day you need, then you still have the flexibility for, yeah, eight.
1:23:49.830 --> 1:23:58.860
Jasmine Tang
I feel like definitely to separate into two different databases are because of like one to maintain and also data similarity issue.
1:23:58.910 --> 1:24:1.300
Jasmine Tang
So these are the thing we need to be careful.
1:24:1.470 --> 1:24:7.610
Jasmine Tang
Currently, the spectrum allowed to set password for media or fakes, it's not.
1:24:7.660 --> 1:24:13.580
Jasmine Tang
It's not, uh, at three there's a there's a quote about the password policy stuff.
1:24:13.860 --> 1:24:14.160
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:24:14.690 --> 1:24:37.970
Jasmine Tang
Uh, something to have something that's really hard coded, maybe imaginary if you support that, then the tester need to test me with and then the the way how we also need to test need to deploy 3 different types, so I think we make things a bit too complicated for the slide I think yeah, right now we study as a regular expression in the keycloak and also our services about Soo policy.
1:24:38.140 --> 1:24:39.50
Jasmine Tang
If I remember correctly.
1:24:42.160 --> 1:24:49.990
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I think our service also have that, but it's fixed on that means you you don't you don't translate during the creation, it's fixed.
1:24:50.0 --> 1:25:1.390
Jasmine Tang
It's hard to the yeah, he does that during the question there will check the password policy that we set in our services and also that we check at the key club as well.
1:25:2.820 --> 1:25:13.430
Jasmine Tang
Pastor, you saw that 16 user or let's say Apple Deal, they already have a have tenant and user really they wanna come here.
1:25:13.440 --> 1:25:20.310
Jasmine Tang
I can understand the the import part that can the migration part that can import to the CSE.
1:25:20.780 --> 1:25:23.70
Jasmine Tang
Once we're done this, they can, they can.
1:25:23.660 --> 1:25:55.120
Jasmine Tang
They can import the user to the system, but how the user know hey I changed authentication and I need to reset my password or something and then do we have that kind of scenario we have when you need to create right then we can when we create a user and then you import a user right whether need to change password or not we we we store this in the user meta data so by default effective we want to force them to reset then we set the metadata the flag to false so when they log in then.
1:25:55.660 --> 1:25:59.610
Jasmine Tang
When they log in from of zero then it will detect.
1:25:59.780 --> 1:26:5.610
Jasmine Tang
So if they check that they haven't at the reset password, didn't you force them to do password?
1:26:5.780 --> 1:26:7.950
Jasmine Tang
Well, Paul should write the code to send out the email.
1:26:8.220 --> 1:26:9.190
Jasmine Tang
It's the good jazz.
1:26:9.320 --> 1:26:11.930
Jasmine Tang
Ohh that OK now wake up already.
1:26:12.320 --> 1:26:15.640
Jasmine Tang
OK, now I just want to make sure we cover all the get there.
1:26:16.560 --> 1:26:17.10
Jasmine Tang
OK, good.
1:26:17.20 --> 1:26:17.150
Jasmine Tang
Good.
1:26:18.800 --> 1:26:19.370
Jasmine Tang
Maybe this?
1:26:19.540 --> 1:26:24.490
Jasmine Tang
I think maybe can I think need to inform the product, tell them about something like this.
1:26:25.670 --> 1:26:26.930
Jasmine Tang
Just say they need to build your way.
1:26:28.180 --> 1:26:33.670
Jasmine Tang
Majority Ideagen are two very important scenario is like on boarding new user uh not.
1:26:33.680 --> 1:26:47.770
Jasmine Tang
And I need to have problem OK and assisting user on the migration part so they the product need to find the gap then the migration actually they they do have a solutions that for the user to reset password one OK.
1:26:47.780 --> 1:26:52.450
Jasmine Tang
But I think Duraid to highlight it, Ideagen doesn't accept that functions.
1:26:52.520 --> 1:26:53.210
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:26:53.220 --> 1:26:53.420
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:26:54.480 --> 1:26:57.70
Jasmine Tang
Because uh, because they do. In order.
1:26:57.120 --> 1:27:6.720
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, they they because they they say when user not in that they can actually capture the password really ohg take some OK then then they just use that to save back to the database.
1:27:7.110 --> 1:27:12.580
Jasmine Tang
So during it was saying that from the experience of the Azure B2C to keycloak migration.
1:27:14.490 --> 1:27:14.880
Jasmine Tang
Which team?
1:27:14.890 --> 1:27:16.740
Jasmine Tang
I'm greedy team.
1:27:16.890 --> 1:27:18.580
Jasmine Tang
They don't accept this solution.
1:27:18.590 --> 1:27:20.170
Jasmine Tang
OK, OK, makes sense.
1:27:22.480 --> 1:27:30.240
Jasmine Tang
Maybe if they don't accept the means, uh, we won't have their password to force them to do the reset password despite those so.
1:27:33.490 --> 1:27:51.460
Jasmine Tang
But in that also means we cannot use their their feature that then I had that that they have to keep out to the show migration to 0 migration maybe we need to use that features also for for for yeah he's talking what I don't know there's that.
1:27:53.750 --> 1:27:55.340
Jasmine Tang
Don't cool, OK?
1:27:58.590 --> 1:28:4.350
Jasmine Tang
But it looks like on the case right now it doesn't need to do that migration.
1:28:5.830 --> 1:28:7.200
Eric Wong
But be to see to Kiko.
1:28:5.800 --> 1:28:10.630
Jasmine Tang
Doesn't need to do uh, the the the.
1:28:10.950 --> 1:28:13.50
Jasmine Tang
Let let's say example D1 way.
1:28:13.60 --> 1:28:15.970
Jasmine Tang
Wanted to on board their existing user.
1:28:16.30 --> 1:28:16.730
Jasmine Tang
What should we do?
1:28:16.800 --> 1:28:18.70
Jasmine Tang
Do we need to do anything along?
1:28:18.640 --> 1:28:21.250
Jasmine Tang
I think we need to think true about this new yourself need to worry.
1:28:21.260 --> 1:28:30.160
Jasmine Tang
All these things should cover the new user on boarding, but the as they sing as they Singh user, I think we didn't write some step there to list down what should we do.
1:28:31.170 --> 1:28:33.270
Eric Wong
But in particular, yes.
1:28:33.410 --> 1:28:37.390
Jasmine Tang
About you'll do some other cannot, cannot like.
1:28:38.240 --> 1:28:41.340
Jasmine Tang
Just remember we need to do some right on that.
1:28:42.840 --> 1:28:43.190
Eric Wong
Umm.
1:28:51.320 --> 1:28:52.990
Jasmine Tang
I just create one more.
1:28:53.160 --> 1:29:0.390
Jasmine Tang
Office will show you forget on create one more road to mention about documentation on onboarding existing users.
1:29:0.750 --> 1:29:3.770
Jasmine Tang
Migration in school out of bed.
1:29:4.190 --> 1:29:11.950
Jasmine Tang
They will keep call on my talking about like the one way migrate to all zero off center me to have one for us should forget one.
1:29:12.180 --> 1:29:13.190
Jasmine Tang
What are they using?
1:29:13.800 --> 1:29:14.840
Jasmine Tang
They don't need to find out.
1:29:15.200 --> 1:29:22.180
Jasmine Tang
I think the one where I think their own thing that their own, I think password normal password login on this thing.
1:29:22.250 --> 1:29:25.460
Jasmine Tang
I don't think they use for external provider.
1:29:28.430 --> 1:29:31.0
Jasmine Tang
It's all this one he got to you, alright?
1:29:31.10 --> 1:29:37.100
Jasmine Tang
So only do that per product, like the one way or off central migrate to authentication right?
1:29:37.110 --> 1:29:39.360
Jasmine Tang
There will be another migration scope.
1:29:39.370 --> 1:29:45.240
Jasmine Tang
I think what we just need one right because based on what you have described being I think it looks like we just need to have one.
1:29:45.350 --> 1:29:47.620
Jasmine Tang
No, no, no.
1:29:47.630 --> 1:29:49.580
Jasmine Tang
I mean, do you Wong way?
1:29:49.730 --> 1:29:51.280
Jasmine Tang
Let's say they do.
1:29:51.290 --> 1:29:51.540
Jasmine Tang
You want.
1:29:51.550 --> 1:29:56.130
Jasmine Tang
We have to do the assign, so I'm I I'm more worried about on our side.
1:29:56.140 --> 1:29:56.710
Jasmine Tang
What should we do?
1:29:57.670 --> 1:29:59.140
Eric Wong
This is more on you this thing right?
1:29:59.150 --> 1:29:59.720
Eric Wong
I'm just.
1:29:59.810 --> 1:30:1.690
Eric Wong
The one we're gonna be product instance, right?
1:30:2.740 --> 1:30:3.950
Eric Wong
If that would come on but.
1:30:5.250 --> 1:30:16.940
Jasmine Tang
OK, let's say it's on the the only way already have a tenant and have 1000 users they want to come to platform they want to integrate with platform.
1:30:18.270 --> 1:30:18.810
Jasmine Tang
What did you do?
1:30:21.0 --> 1:30:21.310
Eric Wong
Right.
1:30:21.360 --> 1:30:21.740
Jasmine Tang
They should.
1:30:21.320 --> 1:30:32.620
Eric Wong
So OK, when you say 11 tenant and 1000 user, I'm assuming that the one way is actually like art as a product and that source of truth is on their side.
1:30:32.710 --> 1:30:42.820
Eric Wong
So now you wanna move the users onto platform and eventually somehow uh go in using odd zero as authentication provider.
1:30:43.180 --> 1:30:43.890
Eric Wong
Is that what you're?
1:30:44.690 --> 1:30:48.140
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, but then then what will be the steps to do they do?
1:30:48.150 --> 1:30:53.360
Jasmine Tang
Do we let them to use the user import and work out metadata they need to fit in?
1:30:53.670 --> 1:30:57.120
Jasmine Tang
How that trigger the reset password?
1:30:57.530 --> 1:31:4.700
Jasmine Tang
There's another question so so I'm not sure if it looks like the reset password flag needed to appear in the user imports.
1:31:4.710 --> 1:31:5.160
Jasmine Tang
All right.
1:31:5.350 --> 1:31:18.370
Jasmine Tang
OK, if that's if if you have that, then if you how how we do right is beside the missing or cost, OK, don't don't say no then don't set first time you will be missing that then it will force them to reset.
1:31:20.160 --> 1:31:20.670
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:31:21.180 --> 1:31:25.250
Jasmine Tang
Then then, then when you tell people all this stuff what to do, then people see. Really.
1:31:25.260 --> 1:31:26.870
Jasmine Tang
OK, I want to do my.
1:31:26.880 --> 1:31:27.370
Jasmine Tang
I don't.
1:31:27.380 --> 1:31:32.510
Jasmine Tang
After we have some of this, they want to do a POC on the migration, then they will test it out.
1:31:32.560 --> 1:31:34.30
Jasmine Tang
I think we need better. Nice it out.
1:31:34.40 --> 1:31:34.520
Jasmine Tang
How we.
1:31:37.100 --> 1:31:43.410
Jasmine Tang
Like the product, the one where they are not going to call the off 0 API directly like I don't think so.
1:31:43.420 --> 1:31:49.410
Jasmine Tang
It's either the the tools that we develop or go through platform service using the user import.
1:31:50.710 --> 1:31:51.910
Jasmine Tang
Do we need to develop the two?
1:31:56.430 --> 1:32:0.960
Jasmine Tang
And all still too early to, I don't know.
1:32:1.30 --> 1:32:7.530
Jasmine Tang
So you're saying that the only thing that we need to migrate is the user in the beginning?
1:32:7.540 --> 1:32:8.0
Jasmine Tang
We migrate.
1:32:8.10 --> 1:32:10.670
Jasmine Tang
The users are the the rest of the thing we we don't cover.
1:32:10.740 --> 1:32:15.40
Jasmine Tang
We have to have the rest of the team radina like that.
1:32:15.500 --> 1:32:19.40
Jasmine Tang
The application client, the connection and then umm.
1:32:20.340 --> 1:32:30.60
Jasmine Tang
But I think what, what what I worry is that we need some documentation that after this like what should we do the bombard new user and assisting user.
1:32:33.510 --> 1:32:39.980
Jasmine Tang
It looks like the user import me to improve a bit like you have a flat that do you want to reset password or not, right?
1:32:40.130 --> 1:32:44.700
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, I think you have that recovery maybe put this together with the user singer.
1:32:44.760 --> 1:32:50.10
Jasmine Tang
Then we got to have a separation that you cannot sing back the user again to the product because of the users.
1:32:50.20 --> 1:32:50.490
Jasmine Tang
Are you there?
1:32:51.610 --> 1:32:55.250
Jasmine Tang
So, but but on certain scenario you have to sing the user to the product.
1:32:56.50 --> 1:33:1.10
Jasmine Tang
True, true, true, we we there's a few ways actually.
1:33:1.640 --> 1:33:3.400
Jasmine Tang
Even if Singh back also.
1:33:5.470 --> 1:33:9.920
Jasmine Tang
Also, also OK, I'm the only man.
1:33:10.250 --> 1:33:17.440
Jasmine Tang
If you the if the user access down there, the solution is by creating the library that allow for that to plug in.
1:33:17.450 --> 1:33:20.700
Jasmine Tang
I think we subscribe to the create user event.
1:33:20.710 --> 1:33:21.220
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:33:21.230 --> 1:33:23.340
Jasmine Tang
Then then, then there will be OK.
1:33:23.350 --> 1:33:29.200
Jasmine Tang
OK, so so this means that if the user import uh see the CSV file, we need to have two.
1:33:29.210 --> 1:33:35.220
Jasmine Tang
That one fact is to reset password along the other one is a dual the sync back to the product alone, right?
1:33:35.490 --> 1:33:44.100
Jasmine Tang
If you have that, then you you you were able to handle all scenario really new user also can handle uh isn't use.
1:33:44.110 --> 1:33:50.20
Jasmine Tang
Also, can we we can we can make the reset password flat as like a optional.
1:33:50.110 --> 1:34:1.880
Jasmine Tang
I think I think if we have that flag right, then when we do the like importing existing user then platform will have to make it as an update instead of yeah to create that.
1:34:3.930 --> 1:34:22.630
Jasmine Tang
Uh, because I think we might need, you know, platform might we might have, uh like product instance ID, tenant ID which the product itself or you don't have they'll be if they say we want those in four to fall back to the products database then you will be an update.
1:34:22.640 --> 1:34:24.570
Jasmine Tang
So maybe not.
1:34:24.920 --> 1:34:25.890
Jasmine Tang
Maybe prefer one.
1:34:25.900 --> 1:34:32.840
Jasmine Tang
Doesn't need to know platform, just do exactly, but the users need to know perform is the one that publishing to the call.
1:34:33.20 --> 1:34:35.870
Jasmine Tang
I thought topic or update topics off.
1:34:35.960 --> 1:34:36.590
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:34:36.600 --> 1:34:37.410
Jasmine Tang
OK, OK.
1:34:37.680 --> 1:34:38.980
Jasmine Tang
I thought user Singh would do that.
1:34:38.990 --> 1:34:40.70
Jasmine Tang
OK, then I agree with you.
1:34:40.120 --> 1:34:40.860
Jasmine Tang
I think it makes sense.
1:34:40.870 --> 1:34:42.50
Jasmine Tang
Maybe some handle that?
1:34:42.120 --> 1:34:45.950
Jasmine Tang
So I think the the we, we don't have to build additional things.
1:34:46.160 --> 1:34:48.880
Jasmine Tang
We should utilize the funny you say pot.
1:34:49.210 --> 1:34:49.960
Jasmine Tang
Use the.
1:34:50.50 --> 1:34:51.140
Jasmine Tang
Use the flag to control.
1:34:51.150 --> 1:34:58.590
Jasmine Tang
So that's mean I I think the status scenario which should cover the new onboarding one, that's mean existing customer.
1:35:0.620 --> 1:35:3.250
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, they only have to use the flat light.
1:35:3.260 --> 1:35:10.10
Jasmine Tang
Do I need to sync the product and do I need to reset password because moving moving ahead in the future, right?
1:35:10.400 --> 1:35:12.450
Jasmine Tang
We we don't want to be the other.
1:35:12.460 --> 1:35:13.970
Jasmine Tang
The Bala we want to be the Bala.
1:35:14.100 --> 1:35:14.510
Jasmine Tang
So.
1:35:14.520 --> 1:35:25.580
Jasmine Tang
So this mean the scenario always handle for new onboarding user but specific flat control to manage the existing customer user.
1:35:27.550 --> 1:35:29.860
Jasmine Tang
Maybe you don't need to build additional things around.
1:35:30.350 --> 1:35:41.20
Jasmine Tang
If you color Newport preform already had these features like and he said password no we import that you but importing Sir and then if we import again the user is already existed.
1:35:41.630 --> 1:35:44.880
Jasmine Tang
How will we handle, ignore or update any?
1:35:44.890 --> 1:35:49.300
Jasmine Tang
Right now, we still proceed with the, but there's some updates and updates are updates.
1:35:49.390 --> 1:35:51.570
Jasmine Tang
Is that yeah.
1:35:51.410 --> 1:35:52.920
Eric Wong
Unless they protected right. Just mean.
1:35:52.930 --> 1:35:53.390
Eric Wong
Is that right?
1:35:56.100 --> 1:36:3.60
Jasmine Tang
That part I need to check and confirm, but I remember if lesson is the existing give it will proceed with the update defeated.
1:36:7.210 --> 1:36:7.450
Eric Wong
OK.
1:36:3.70 --> 1:36:9.760
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, input data is not not not the same as the one day being imported previously.
1:36:11.60 --> 1:36:11.370
Eric Wong
OK.
1:36:10.550 --> 1:36:11.690
Jasmine Tang
You ohh sorry to be.
1:36:11.730 --> 1:36:13.640
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, but we we need to ask that question too.
1:36:13.650 --> 1:36:17.520
Jasmine Tang
Do you only add the product if I update the user is view that trigger any other thing?
1:36:17.530 --> 1:36:26.30
Jasmine Tang
Sometimes I might not know your triggers are email on the other side, so it's better to have a flat that control how we need.
1:36:27.780 --> 1:36:39.330
Jasmine Tang
So example the the CSU import Excel spreadsheet, we need to have sounds like we need to have two more additional control flat one is do I need to sync back to product?
1:36:39.380 --> 1:36:44.270
Jasmine Tang
I think we do have this facility, some problems should do something else, maybe with trigger event and then some.
1:36:44.280 --> 1:36:45.390
Jasmine Tang
Something big will happen.
1:36:45.980 --> 1:36:53.890
Jasmine Tang
The other thing is to reset password not OK let's say when the cloud operation they want to do migration on existing product.
1:36:54.180 --> 1:36:55.850
Jasmine Tang
You can set the user you want to migrate.
1:36:55.860 --> 1:36:58.170
Jasmine Tang
Important to iPhone, but you have a flag to control.
1:37:0.340 --> 1:37:10.140
Jasmine Tang
For species to understand better product, not one that's been 10 then the one, then the other face to refund to reset password or not.
1:37:10.630 --> 1:37:13.30
Jasmine Tang
Then from there we can, I think we can control better.
1:37:17.780 --> 1:37:23.50
Jasmine Tang
To all these control flat is sick in whitefish and should be in the special.
1:37:23.170 --> 1:37:25.720
Jasmine Tang
How are you placing some product?
1:37:25.870 --> 1:37:27.20
Jasmine Tang
Some product don't need that.
1:37:27.70 --> 1:37:37.760
Jasmine Tang
Then you can control for them, but you won't import user ones on here for dependable products, no import you so sure importer then one it wouldn't.
1:37:37.770 --> 1:37:39.320
Jasmine Tang
It wouldn't be for that one.
1:37:39.450 --> 1:37:45.860
Jasmine Tang
It would be for that one because some product, some some, some user, they don't, they they haven't removed migrate.
1:37:45.870 --> 1:37:52.290
Jasmine Tang
Everything will be one by one, one month it will be Best Buy best one if you need to inform before we migrate them to Irma.
1:37:52.790 --> 1:38:3.720
Jasmine Tang
Uh, some support team or a comment also have to inform that we migrate you to this sauce platform and he will trigger reset password.
1:38:3.730 --> 1:38:11.940
Jasmine Tang
He definitely need to do organization and batch, but organizations are, but then they say this group of users have access to this product.
1:38:12.550 --> 1:38:17.0
Jasmine Tang
The other group user have access to the the other, another one that had a molex.
1:38:18.30 --> 1:38:24.220
Jasmine Tang
Then you need that to some need to sing that someone need to sing that because they're going to abort product by product.
1:38:24.230 --> 1:38:28.710
Jasmine Tang
You won't go like suddenly on my bike went two products together.
1:38:30.720 --> 1:38:32.330
Jasmine Tang
It was like a thing on how to.
1:38:32.920 --> 1:38:33.790
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, you're right.
1:38:33.800 --> 1:38:41.50
Jasmine Tang
Because they could be too product 2 product, they could be a product that could be much cheaper.
1:38:41.60 --> 1:38:45.840
Jasmine Tang
Couple user or could be some user that is already have common access to both products.
1:38:47.110 --> 1:38:51.550
Jasmine Tang
Hopefully our side, we just we just see issues, Sir.
1:38:52.810 --> 1:38:54.860
Jasmine Tang
We will sing to, to product.
1:38:55.840 --> 1:38:58.790
Eric Wong
At the moment in the BAU happened.
1:38:58.800 --> 1:39:4.210
Eric Wong
Is each user will have details of the product instances it has.
1:39:4.650 --> 1:39:15.210
Eric Wong
It has access to and I think beta based on that there is active or inactive or something like that to determine whether anything about this user need to sync back to that product instance or not.
1:39:16.630 --> 1:39:27.250
Jasmine Tang
And yeah, maybe, maybe, maybe you need to think about the scenario where we, I think the most complicated case are is like at least you have two product and how do we do it?
1:39:30.590 --> 1:39:32.960
Jasmine Tang
Actually I'm not sure up.
1:39:32.970 --> 1:39:34.60
Jasmine Tang
You can come here.
1:39:34.300 --> 1:39:34.900
Jasmine Tang
You can be here.
1:39:36.900 --> 1:39:38.20
Jasmine Tang
Can be a multiple.
1:39:39.810 --> 1:39:50.480
Jasmine Tang
Beat wise, where you or something that reset password for user might not problem 01 by another column is like you can determine which product you want to sing.
1:39:51.350 --> 1:39:55.190
Jasmine Tang
All or one if the field is a bit wise then you can enter it.
1:39:55.200 --> 1:40:6.780
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, one one or three then this mean, you know which product on the same design that do we need to handle for that also as another question you be be wise you can good enough.
1:40:13.0 --> 1:40:13.410
Jasmine Tang
Easier.
1:40:15.530 --> 1:40:19.20
Jasmine Tang
No, that migration everything here it's not only migration though.
1:40:19.350 --> 1:40:20.160
Jasmine Tang
OK, OK.
1:40:20.170 --> 1:40:21.960
Jasmine Tang
Ping things are all your concern is about like.
1:40:21.970 --> 1:40:22.240
Jasmine Tang
OK.
1:40:22.280 --> 1:40:29.320
Jasmine Tang
OK, maybe one to sync to the one way, but the one to sync the web Sentral right something OK you use speed wise then you can do really.
1:40:33.380 --> 1:40:38.460
Jasmine Tang
Just thinking how how the process is going to work, are they say how we do right effectively go for the?
1:40:41.270 --> 1:40:49.800
Jasmine Tang
The library method that they missed we we develop a library that those products can plug in which it will subscribe the event, right?
1:40:49.810 --> 1:40:54.550
Jasmine Tang
So let's say we onboard, we we uh, my great 31 way first.
1:40:55.170 --> 1:41:5.660
Jasmine Tang
Then during the time we use the user import features and then platform service will create the events use either update user email or create user event.
1:41:6.210 --> 1:41:7.690
Jasmine Tang
Then people will subscribe.
1:41:8.70 --> 1:41:13.270
Jasmine Tang
Then after that, when we, uh on, but let's say off central.
1:41:15.390 --> 1:41:20.170
Jasmine Tang
Because to reimport the user and this user when very import right?
1:41:20.520 --> 1:41:27.300
Jasmine Tang
Some might be like overlap with the existing user that I I think it's almost off center as a second product.
1:41:27.340 --> 1:41:30.220
Jasmine Tang
I think we need a features in the platform to set.
1:41:30.260 --> 1:41:34.550
Jasmine Tang
OK, I want this file user to people of Central Dan.
1:41:34.630 --> 1:41:38.950
Jasmine Tang
Something should trigger the the the the users.
1:41:39.390 --> 1:41:40.160
Jasmine Tang
I feel they will.
1:41:40.330 --> 1:41:51.750
Jasmine Tang
I I I Eric, if I say 1 user have access to two products like are we going to create two different events or create 1 events?
1:41:53.580 --> 1:41:55.300
Eric Wong
At the moment it will be 1 event.
1:41:56.510 --> 1:42:1.10
Jasmine Tang
One event then in that event will show like this user have access to which products are.
1:42:1.710 --> 1:42:4.960
Eric Wong
Uh, I believe yes, that will be.
1:42:6.810 --> 1:42:13.790
Eric Wong
If I remember correct, that would be separate event that is more linking about which user to which product instance. Umm.
1:42:13.950 --> 1:42:14.920
Jasmine Tang
But they're still OK.
1:42:15.150 --> 1:42:17.270
Jasmine Tang
OK, at least you had this information.
1:42:17.450 --> 1:42:18.530
Jasmine Tang
Better than don't have no.
1:42:19.920 --> 1:42:24.430
Eric Wong
I don't recall in uh user event actually has product instances.
1:42:24.440 --> 1:42:24.880
Eric Wong
I'm not sure.
1:42:24.890 --> 1:42:41.710
Eric Wong
I don't think so, but I do know that if you link a user to a product instance or remove a user from to a product instance, that will be an event and by default now when the new user on board, if there's existing product instances, that user will automatically on board with this.
1:42:43.650 --> 1:42:45.190
Eric Wong
Linked to this, uh, product instances.
1:42:48.680 --> 1:42:55.980
Jasmine Tang
But how we notify the product that they go to either updates or create the user, right?
1:42:57.950 --> 1:42:59.30
Jasmine Tang
Oops there I think.
1:42:58.120 --> 1:43:5.290
Eric Wong
Is it when when we create a new user there would be a user event fire into product that already link right?
1:43:5.700 --> 1:43:21.80
Eric Wong
So and then if when you link a product, there will be already be considered have this product as a product instances in in the particular tenant and when we onboard a new user, the user will be automatically linked into existing product instances.
1:43:21.90 --> 1:43:31.980
Eric Wong
So there will be another event fire saying that this user is linking to these product instances, so there will be 2 events, minimally 2 events.
1:43:35.130 --> 1:43:35.320
Jasmine Tang
Like.
1:43:34.700 --> 1:43:39.80
Eric Wong
One is the user created into the system and another one is the user is linked to these product instances.
1:43:40.10 --> 1:43:42.920
Jasmine Tang
I can see there will be issues are like in platform.
1:43:42.930 --> 1:43:58.830
Jasmine Tang
You will have a record saying that this user have access to this problem, but then because the product is not, I subscribe to the events, so the user will be missing from the from the from the other database.
1:44:0.60 --> 1:44:5.400
Eric Wong
Yeah, so so at least, OK, at least if you look at the scope of art, right, they need to listen to the event.
1:44:7.180 --> 1:44:9.680
Eric Wong
So those products that integrate just need to listen to the events.
1:44:10.480 --> 1:44:14.270
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, but but then you see, yeah, let's say come first, then up.
1:44:16.20 --> 1:44:17.830
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm. Umm.
1:44:14.280 --> 1:44:18.390
Jasmine Tang
Already got the data, then the one will come next, so you won't.
1:44:18.540 --> 1:44:25.640
Jasmine Tang
You will not publish the to create the same user again, so the one way we don't know that this user need to be added.
1:44:27.280 --> 1:44:28.290
Eric Wong
Uh.
1:44:30.540 --> 1:44:32.980
Eric Wong
That's where we talk about the two way Singh rate.
1:44:33.380 --> 1:44:35.230
Eric Wong
Previously, I'm not sure what the yeah.
1:44:33.870 --> 1:44:36.790
Jasmine Tang
Ah, but I think so.
1:44:36.920 --> 1:44:38.130
Jasmine Tang
We will go one way, right?
1:44:38.300 --> 1:44:38.630
Jasmine Tang
Yeah.
1:44:39.680 --> 1:44:42.70
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, but he's OK.
1:44:42.290 --> 1:44:44.660
Jasmine Tang
This one can, yes.
1:44:44.20 --> 1:44:46.830
Eric Wong
This one is more more this one is more about thinking user.
1:44:46.840 --> 1:44:49.630
Eric Wong
I mean this is more for the more for the initial stage, right?
1:44:50.260 --> 1:44:50.520
Jasmine Tang
So.
1:44:50.160 --> 1:44:58.960
Eric Wong
But in terms of linking to the to the product itself, so the instances are already there and the user not created, then we have to link it manually.
1:44:58.970 --> 1:45:4.650
Eric Wong
So meaning to say if a product instance is created after the users, the link, you have to be done individually.
1:45:7.850 --> 1:45:9.50
Eric Wong
Then there will be an event as well.
1:45:6.630 --> 1:45:11.320
Jasmine Tang
Uh, listen, then you take the accusation.
1:45:12.340 --> 1:45:12.480
Eric Wong
Uh.
1:45:11.330 --> 1:45:15.630
Jasmine Tang
Example AQ pulse are for it to do the authorization partner.
1:45:16.160 --> 1:45:16.380
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
1:45:16.40 --> 1:45:17.600
Jasmine Tang
That means authentication done really.
1:45:21.840 --> 1:45:22.30
Eric Wong
Mm-hmm.
1:45:25.690 --> 1:45:25.900
Eric Wong
Yes.
1:45:28.110 --> 1:45:28.470
Eric Wong
Uh-huh.
1:45:17.610 --> 1:45:28.820
Jasmine Tang
Then you need to check this user have access to what module, what features E they got to have the user in their own database, storing whatever Keepass is needed that so.
1:45:37.520 --> 1:45:37.660
Eric Wong
Yes.
1:45:29.270 --> 1:45:43.50
Jasmine Tang
So what I mean is, uh, if the by the time the point that has been on boarded the user is already exists in platform then you will you will not create the you will not publish a create user event again.
1:45:44.110 --> 1:45:44.750
Eric Wong
Yes, correct.
1:45:43.660 --> 1:45:48.160
Jasmine Tang
Then that keeplist upright, so it will be missing in their own database.
1:45:49.590 --> 1:45:50.280
Eric Wong
Yes, correct.
1:45:57.810 --> 1:45:58.520
Jasmine Tang
Yes, yes.
1:45:50.290 --> 1:45:58.970
Eric Wong
So in that sense, it's what I'm saying when it comes to newly on board product, right, then something needs to be done on the user sync part, yeah.
1:45:58.890 --> 1:46:0.60
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, yeah.
1:46:3.930 --> 1:46:4.500
Jasmine Tang
Open.
1:46:4.510 --> 1:46:8.160
Jasmine Tang
Probably we need to like reimport the user again, then perform we have to fill.
1:46:8.270 --> 1:46:11.570
Eric Wong
And we could always we could always.
1:46:11.580 --> 1:46:12.30
Eric Wong
I don't know.
1:46:12.40 --> 1:46:21.700
Eric Wong
I mean on top of my head, we could always create create a specific endpoint or a feature to just say OK we publish selected user to this particular product instance.
1:46:22.490 --> 1:46:23.330
Jasmine Tang
Not yet, yeah.
1:46:24.410 --> 1:46:29.580
Eric Wong
Then we just republished the events and of course all this event will be published into the topic.
1:46:29.860 --> 1:46:36.740
Eric Wong
If anyone subscribed to the topic, they would receive it, so it's also up to them how they want to see whether they want to hand.
1:46:36.750 --> 1:46:45.170
Eric Wong
I mean, they want to do something about the event or not and that's where the so called product instance ID and so on tenant ID comes in place.
1:46:49.610 --> 1:46:50.40
Jasmine Tang
Yeah. OK.
1:46:49.450 --> 1:46:58.560
Eric Wong
But again, up we'll get the same same same event, but if they want to, you know, even though if there is not, there are art product instance and then they wanna do something about it, then that's up to them, right?
1:46:58.790 --> 1:46:59.420
Eric Wong
That's what I'm saying.
1:47:1.320 --> 1:47:1.680
Jasmine Tang
But for.
1:47:1.0 --> 1:47:6.540
Eric Wong
So we can have a feature to actually republish to a specific tenant product instance, I would say.
1:47:8.640 --> 1:47:22.130
Jasmine Tang
If you do that, I think you better notify all the products that because they I don't think they will expect that you will be republishing the events 2 times are without the application is already handled for that or not. Uh.
1:47:24.10 --> 1:47:26.50
Eric Wong
Or another way is.
1:47:30.130 --> 1:47:33.820
Eric Wong
Yet to find some interfacing to to their product in a way, yeah.
1:47:34.740 --> 1:47:34.910
Jasmine Tang
So.
1:47:34.230 --> 1:47:38.340
Eric Wong
But now we are just talking solely about eventing, but it could be some other thing.
1:47:38.350 --> 1:47:38.820
Eric Wong
I'm not sure.
1:47:38.830 --> 1:47:41.200
Eric Wong
Yeah, that's the gap there.
1:47:41.270 --> 1:47:42.430
Eric Wong
I agree that's a gap there.
1:47:46.880 --> 1:47:47.0
Eric Wong
Yeah.
1:47:44.100 --> 1:47:49.570
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, something that we need to think about, we put the whole thing to actually, should I?
1:47:49.580 --> 1:47:57.450
Jasmine Tang
I'm not sure how I feel like when triggered the event for users should inside the same vent should know the user belongs to what product.
1:47:57.510 --> 1:47:59.50
Jasmine Tang
That easy, ready for users thing.
1:47:58.350 --> 1:48:3.320
Eric Wong
There is there is as far as I remember, there's always tenant ID and product instance ID.
1:48:4.440 --> 1:48:6.330
Jasmine Tang
And then then should be good enough for.
1:48:6.380 --> 1:48:11.240
Jasmine Tang
Maybe it's is we need to link back to user sync discussion in the Supreme Court.
1:48:12.740 --> 1:48:16.940
Jasmine Tang
The user Sin must know where is the user belongs to.
1:48:27.860 --> 1:48:35.70
Jasmine Tang
Two regarding this now the the JK mentioned about the migration things, what do we need to specifically put thing?
1:48:36.250 --> 1:49:9.830
Jasmine Tang
I think you have to inform the some of the suggestion that maybe he thinks he's going to feel like we just make our of a workflow flexy birth or difference in area not and show show show you be some cases like big, big, mentioned one and due to certain reason on boarding existing user cannot sync to certain product due to some reason but some product OK and because certain product might have their own logic and then something when you when under the user something figure at the end and do something really.
1:49:9.840 --> 1:49:16.540
Jasmine Tang
So we need to be more careful as long as we have the flexibility, then we can entirely cover majority of the cases.
1:49:17.560 --> 1:49:28.890
Jasmine Tang
The the scenario where we need to migrate this type is is the product is using their own database not using any of the external IDP external IDP.
1:49:28.900 --> 1:49:30.460
Jasmine Tang
We can just set up the external IDP.
1:49:30.470 --> 1:49:31.630
Jasmine Tang
We don't have to do migration.
1:49:34.450 --> 1:49:34.760
Jasmine Tang
Uh.
1:49:34.770 --> 1:49:36.810
Jasmine Tang
True, you may SSO one.
1:49:38.50 --> 1:49:43.440
Jasmine Tang
They say they are using Azure but they are not using like that.
1:49:43.450 --> 1:49:44.210
Jasmine Tang
The external IDP.
1:49:44.220 --> 1:49:46.420
Jasmine Tang
Then he could wait on it.
1:49:46.890 --> 1:49:55.920
Jasmine Tang
But when we want to integrate, we just set up the SSO so that they don't have to do user didn't reset password, no need for external SSO.
1:49:55.980 --> 1:49:59.370
Jasmine Tang
We can do it and I cannot but but but.
1:49:59.610 --> 1:50:10.30
Jasmine Tang
But the thing to which products still under our control right now, the the migration thing that you mentioned is now is for the scenario where they manage their own database, they don't use anything.
1:50:10.990 --> 1:50:12.720
Jasmine Tang
It seems that they are quite lost scenario.
1:50:12.730 --> 1:50:13.660
Jasmine Tang
We need some, right?
1:50:13.760 --> 1:50:15.440
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, because we need to say that.
1:50:15.450 --> 1:50:20.320
Jasmine Tang
OK, what is the user journey for user that under IDP one?
1:50:20.830 --> 1:50:30.590
Jasmine Tang
Once the user journey under zero negative during the migration process, I am saying everything so we need to write down so then we can see the whole thing in the big picture.
1:50:30.600 --> 1:50:34.280
Jasmine Tang
Right now, it's like, hey, we wanna have their own technology and then we are talking around.
1:50:34.290 --> 1:50:35.360
Jasmine Tang
So it could be very good.
1:50:37.220 --> 1:50:38.290
Jasmine Tang
I guess it turns out.
1:50:38.300 --> 1:50:38.890
Jasmine Tang
Thank you.
1:50:39.200 --> 1:50:39.930
Jasmine Tang
The babysitter.
1:50:39.980 --> 1:50:40.400
Jasmine Tang
But then?
1:50:42.610 --> 1:50:47.570
Jasmine Tang
E It's more user journey of the users have the the user journey of the scenario.
1:50:50.240 --> 1:50:50.800
Jasmine Tang
So let's see.
1:50:52.750 --> 1:50:58.660
Jasmine Tang
I think it's gonna mention he called for the SSO and native Port 0 so.
1:51:0.970 --> 1:51:10.50
Jasmine Tang
I think the terminology that you use external the external IDP mean SSO for the corporate.
1:51:11.920 --> 1:51:17.350
Jasmine Tang
The Azure of time OK, this means the corporate already had their own assessor E, right?
1:51:17.940 --> 1:51:19.640
Jasmine Tang
Yeah, on directory.
1:51:22.410 --> 1:51:26.610
Jasmine Tang
That that is standard either or IDC or several.
1:51:27.970 --> 1:51:31.60
Jasmine Tang
I 0 support more than that actually, but.
1:51:33.140 --> 1:51:37.650
Jasmine Tang
Getting majority are in hydrogen engine ID a 1890% several tour.
1:51:39.360 --> 1:51:40.970
Jasmine Tang
Umm, it's OK.
1:51:41.20 --> 1:51:44.10
Jasmine Tang
This is more to testing purposes.
1:51:44.520 --> 1:52:2.50
Jasmine Tang
The user journey needs some right now, like uh onboarding assisting customer with SSO onboarding, assisting customers, customer with native Fox 0 on building new user on boarding user with multiple product with a few disconfirmation where we have that.
1:52:2.60 --> 1:52:3.30
Jasmine Tang
Then you know what to do.
1:52:3.450 --> 1:52:6.880
Jasmine Tang
Holding for new is covered the other side already.
1:52:6.890 --> 1:52:10.290
Jasmine Tang
Man, that's how we have the user import, but we need we write down.
1:52:10.300 --> 1:52:11.860
Jasmine Tang
You write down things that we need to.
1:52:13.960 --> 1:52:16.220
Jasmine Tang
Is this sessions is small for the migration now?
1:52:16.970 --> 1:52:18.610
Jasmine Tang
The accessing assisting 1.
1:52:20.810 --> 1:52:29.420
Jasmine Tang
Almost daily, that mostly the scenario where you will deploy user to two different product will happen in either one of the user journey because it's a combination month.
1:52:29.750 --> 1:52:36.350
Jasmine Tang
So that's mean, naturally you will have, like pull up five to six different scenario.
1:52:37.560 --> 1:52:38.380
Jasmine Tang
He sounds very important.
1:52:39.790 --> 1:52:41.880
Jasmine Tang
If this didn't change the score Honolulu.
1:52:44.970 --> 1:52:47.200
Jasmine Tang
And once we had no these are then we know what to do really.
1:52:59.100 --> 1:53:3.570
Jasmine Tang
But maybe the user journey we we leave it to keep to do some right online.
1:53:3.580 --> 1:53:5.250
Jasmine Tang
I think we need to make some decision.
1:53:7.970 --> 1:53:13.960
Jasmine Tang
So it looks like there by 5:00 to 6:00 condition, then yeah, like something like that.
1:53:13.970 --> 1:53:17.950
Jasmine Tang
The corporate complete on boarding with new SSO.
1:53:19.330 --> 1:53:20.610
Jasmine Tang
I'll bet on boarding weed.
1:53:21.930 --> 1:53:27.760
Jasmine Tang
Uh native possible corporate on boarding with multiple product.
1:53:29.710 --> 1:53:30.230
Jasmine Tang
And then also.
1:53:31.870 --> 1:53:37.200
Jasmine Tang
Company migrating assisting of the Asia.
1:53:37.340 --> 1:53:42.600
Jasmine Tang
If you think of, but I think if you get up together permutation looks like we have like 6 scenario.
1:53:46.410 --> 1:53:52.910
Jasmine Tang
And I think once we have that, then we we we we looked at the whole thing again and see do we miss out anything?
1:54:4.360 --> 1:54:10.810
Jasmine Tang
To adapt to here to kinda reflect the little bit on the platform side to store and show you line.
1:54:11.380 --> 1:54:14.940
Jasmine Tang
So the use the UI part in this one.
1:54:15.840 --> 1:54:16.910
Jasmine Tang
Need a separate discussion?
1:54:16.920 --> 1:54:23.150
Jasmine Tang
We give a direct, but I think we can consolidate all the UI related uh stocking.
1:54:23.160 --> 1:54:30.890
Jasmine Tang
One call we do it and this one I think just now you mentioned is for the Incognito scope, right?
1:54:30.900 --> 1:54:35.40
Jasmine Tang
So I read the card Ping and ohh this button.
1:54:35.230 --> 1:54:35.830
Jasmine Tang
What baby?
1:54:36.30 --> 1:54:39.320
Jasmine Tang
So they don't confuse confusion on the user pool.
1:54:39.940 --> 1:54:40.320
Jasmine Tang
Delete that.
1:54:44.330 --> 1:54:46.430
Jasmine Tang
OK and.
1:54:50.100 --> 1:54:56.160
Jasmine Tang
So the bug report I think is one is specifically for all zero and bedded features.
1:54:56.450 --> 1:55:20.740
Jasmine Tang
So currently the decision is set as no first but some of the scope of here later will be moved to a separate column which is as part of the enhancement on platform services current dot import People functions alright and there will be a separate section that contact by Bing Bing to go through the user journey.
1:55:20.750 --> 1:55:27.150
Jasmine Tang
Difference between people and all zero and this one is aligned.
1:55:27.160 --> 1:55:38.150
Jasmine Tang
That will be part of the MVP and I think on the US copy will be further aligned with Keith and also Duraid, right.
1:55:38.160 --> 1:55:48.290
Jasmine Tang
So organization and data based creation currently parked as to be confirmed 1st and separate discussion and confirmation would be conducted with Duraid.
1:55:49.480 --> 1:56:6.700
Jasmine Tang
And I think this one uh, I just setting a topic mobile, but I know just now I think this is something that we need and I think this one involved two part that I think one of the part is that there will be a further conversation with you.
1:56:7.520 --> 1:56:22.870
Jasmine Tang
Uh, there is per product instances or per product, but I think based on the discussion today it is more you know more leaning to the area of product census and separately UI scope.
1:56:22.880 --> 1:56:47.610
Jasmine Tang
I didn't cover part of the discussion with ease, and so all the UI related I will sync up with during active on set it any questions before we wrap up today and also for this migration just now as part of the Ohh additional scope that we discussed.
1:56:47.620 --> 1:57:4.680
Jasmine Tang
I think I just put it here and then later I will try to compile the some of the error that just does not JK mentioned and then we go through again and see whether we miss out anything on the on the area or the use case that may not just have to go.
1:57:4.690 --> 1:57:6.260
Jasmine Tang
I mean for performance I can understand.
1:57:6.270 --> 1:57:8.970
Jasmine Tang
I think we need to go through with the cipher group again because.
1:57:10.180 --> 1:57:16.670
Jasmine Tang
Ohh user seeing people who work on user Singh need to understand the whole thing because these are all together.
1:57:16.680 --> 1:57:18.960
Jasmine Tang
That's that's not the whole project is together on.
1:57:27.270 --> 1:57:27.940
Jasmine Tang
Thank you.
1:57:28.10 --> 1:57:29.120
Jasmine Tang
Thinking along.
1:57:29.580 --> 1:57:30.870
Jasmine Tang
Thank you, Eric.
1:57:31.930 --> 1:57

Based on the above trasncript, suggest a comprehensive User Journeys  that captures the entirety of user pathways, focusing on scenarios such as new user onboarding. Consider all possible scenarios.