Given multiple reviews about 1977 movie Close Encounters of the Third Kind, each offering insights, opinions, or criticisms on a single topic, merge them into a single, cohesive review. When reviews offer opposing viewpoints, ensure that both perspectives are represented in a balanced way. Structure the text to flow smoothly, weaving different points together to create a well-rounded summary. Ensure the text remains clear and easily understandable by removing any jokes, insider references, or quotes.Aim for a polished and engaging tone, creating a review that feels comprehensive and reflects the diversity of opinions. The text should be very long. Here the given reviews: ["Didn't like it I looked so forward watching CEOFTK as everyone had nothing but the best to say about it, but watching it, was nothing but disappointment. From the first 15 minutes I was bored and the rest did not satisfy me to the extent that I found it hard to stay concentrated till the end. It seems a movie starting nowhere and going nowhere, no plot no story just randomness. I know most people will disagree but the bottom line is I am not watching this movie ever again. ", "Genius Movie... What do you expect, its Spielberg, the guy knows how to make excellent movies. This is fabulous, from making a sculpture out of mashed potato to meeting Gray's. It's a must watch for any Sci-Fi fan. ", 'Close Encounters of the First Rate Warning: Spoilers NOTE: This comment comes from the collector\'s edition of the movie. When "Close Encounters of the Third Kind" was first released in 1977, it was still common that B-movies, reminiscent of the older sci-fi flicks of the \'50s, were produced and shown in theaters. But it must be admitted that the \'70s generation was very different from the \'50s. Belief in science was stronger than ever and the Cold War context was less tense than it was one or two decades before. In fact, there were few sci-fi movies during that period. Only two big-budgeted movies released previously shared the same vision of outer-space visitors than "Close Encounters": "The Day the Earth Stood Still" and "2001". The difference with "Close Encounters" is that it\'s far more accessible and it drifts away political contexts in favor of pure entertainment, brilliantly orchestrated by the young prodigy Steven Spielberg. "Close Encounters" is a movie divided in three sub-plots which gradually come together. Roy Neary (Richard Dreyfuss) is an electrical repairman who lives with his wife (Teri Garr) and his three children (Shawn Bishop, Adrienne Campbell and Dreyfuss\' real-life son Justin). When a mysterious black-out occurs, Roy is sent to repairs but he witnesses an UFO and makes a close encounter of the second kind (physical evidence, as the UFO\'s lights cause a \'sunburn\' to Roy). From now on, Roy becomes obsessed with that experience. He eventually begins to act oddly as he constantly sees a mysterious shape everywhere and he locks himself in the bathroom with the shower wide open on him still in clothes. On another part, Jillian (Melinda Dillon), a single mother, lives with his young son Barry (unforgettable Cary Guffey) but her UFO experience is far more horrible as aliens inexplicably abduct Barry. The third part is about a group of UN scientists led by French researcher Claude Lacombe (famous French filmmaker François Truffaut, in his only Hollywood actor role). After discovering Flight 19 (a fleet which disappeared in the infamous Bermuda Triangle area) in Mexico desert and a large cargo ship in the Gobi Desert (weird, isn\'t it?), Lacombe and the scientists discover that aliens could land near Devil\'s Tower in Wyoming. Like he did with the shark in "Jaws", Spielberg wisely shows the aliens only when the film\'s almost over. And when he does, he shows a never-seen-before portray of the \'visitors\', which is far away from the bug-eyed monsters of these famous \'50s movies. He develops special effects to create wonder and astonishment instead of laughable horror. The spaceships are beautiful and the child-like aliens are so wonderful, we could hug them. I also loved the scenes when inanimate objects begin to move by themselves on an uncontrollable way, such as Barry\'s toys, the mailboxes and especially the horrific sequence in Jillian\'s house that gives an impression that we\'re watching a \'house-comes-alive\'-style of movie. And of all performances in the movie, Dreyfuss is by far the greatest with his obsessed Roy role. Highlighted must be the scenes when he cracks up while sculpting that shape in his gravy and his frustration when he cannot figure what does that shape mean. And who could forget the music? The famous five-note sequence has definitely entered into popular culture and it has become the movie\'s trademark. Possibly the greatest sci-fi movie of the 70s, "Close Encounters" still wonders today. Its special effects haven\'t dated at all and its depiction of aliens looks like nothing that preceded or even followed it. That\'s why it\'s an immortal. An infinite classic. A feat of interstellar proportions... '] Please respond to my question, and always conclude your reply with the words 'Reply finished' to indicate that your response is complete. Ensure that the text is fully formed without any placeholders such as '[Conclusion]' or '[Placeholder]'. Make sure the reply is fully contained before these words and is not cut off prematurely. Thank you.