System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Factuality: Did the model extract pertinent and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation when factual knowledge retrieval is needed? Is the response supported by reliable evidence or citation of the source of its information?
Score 1: The model did not extract pertinent background knowledge and provided inaccurate or misleading information. There is no support for the response through reliable evidence or source citations.
Score 2: The model extracted some relevant background knowledge but included inaccuracies or incomplete information. The response has minimal support through evidence or citations, with questionable reliability.
Score 3: The model extracted generally accurate and pertinent background knowledge, with minor inaccuracies or omissions. The response is partially supported by evidence or citations, but the support may not be comprehensive or fully reliable.
Score 4: The model extracted mostly accurate and relevant background knowledge but missed minor evidence or citations to support the response.
Score 5: The model extracted complete and accurate background knowledge without any misinformation. The response is fully supported by reliable evidence or citations that are accurate, relevant, and comprehensive in addressing the instruction.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
Please let me know all available entities for the provided question.\nQuestion: Which citizen of the United States of America was a bishop, not of the Catholic Church

[Ground truth Answer]
Charles J. Chaput, James Thomas O'Dowd, John Shelby Spong, Francisco Garmendia, Jeffrey N. Steenson, Edmond L. Browning, James Anthony Tamayo, Gene Robinson, George David Cummins, Mark Hanson, Thomas Langdon Grace, Edward Gerard Hettinger, Gustave Augustin Rouxel, John Raphael Hagan, Thomas James Wade, James Louis Flaherty, Henry Klonowski, Martin Walter Stanton, Joseph Arthur Costello, Michael Joseph Green, Pius Anthony Benincasa, John Joseph Dougherty, Thomas William Lyons, William Joseph McDonald, James Joseph Gerrard, Jerome Arthur Pechillo, Augustine Danglmayr, Joseph Abel Francis, Robert Francis Garner, James Patrick Mahoney, James Louis Schad, James Edward Fitzgerald, Firmin Martin Schmidt, Peter Joseph O'Reilly, Denis Matthew Lowney, James Myles O'Gorman, Henry D. Phillips, Leroy Matthiesen, John E. Hines, John Allin, Keith Ackerman, Alfredo Méndez-Gonzalez, William O'Shea, Frank T. Griswold, William P. Remington, Katharine Jefferts Schori, William White, Paul Moore, Daniel of Erie, Vasile Louis Puscas, Mary Glasspool, Adolph John Paschang, Innocent Lotocky, Benedict Joseph Fenwick, Francis Xavier Ford, Camillus Paul Maes, Clarence James Duhart, Patrick R. Cooney, Edward Francis Hoban, Felix Ley, Robert Duncan, George M. Murray, James Augustine Healy, John Joseph Glynn, John Quinlan, Kevin Michael Britt, Arthur C. Lichtenberger, Arthur J. Serratelli, Patrick Joseph James Keane, Paul Jones, Roy Clyde Clark, Samuel David Ferguson, Samuel G. Babcock, Thomas Francis Hendricken, Thomas Patrick Roger Foley, William Croswell Doane, William Michael Cosgrove, William T. Manning, Borys Gudziak, Phillips Brooks

[Assistant's Response]
In response to your query about U.S. citizens who served as bishops outside of the Catholic Church, several notable figures come to mind:

1. **John Shelby Spong** - An influential Episcopal bishop, Spong was known for his progressive theological views and advocacy for social justice. He served as the Bishop of Newark from 1976 to 2000 and was a prominent voice in the debate on issues such as gender and sexuality within the church.

2. **Desmond Tutu** - While Tutu was originally from South Africa and not a U.S. citizen, he is often mentioned in discussions about influential bishops due to his significant impact on global Anglicanism and his work in human rights. However, he does not fit the specific criteria of being a U.S. citizen.

3. **Michael Curry** - The current Presiding Bishop of the Episcopal Church, Curry is known for his charismatic preaching and focus on love as a central tenet of faith. He became the first African American bishop to lead the Episcopal Church in 2015.

4. **Barbara Harris** - She was the first woman to be consecrated as a bishop in the Anglican Communion, serving as the Bishop of Massachusetts from 1989 to 2003. Her leadership focused on inclusivity and social justice.

5. **Thomas C. Wright** - He served as an Episcopal bishop and was known for his commitment to ecumenism and interfaith dialogue.

These individuals represent a range of perspectives and contributions within the Anglican tradition, which is distinct from the Catholic Church. If you have more specific criteria or need further examples, please let me know!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: