Below is my dissertation report.
I need to do oa 2-minute ppt presentation video to introduce my artefact in 3 or 4 slides
Generate all the content of all the slides for me


Abstract
The pervasive adoption of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in healthcare has revolutionized patient care and operational efficiency but has simultaneously heightened security vulnerabilities. The ArchiveIoT Threat Management System was developed to address these critical challenges, offering a comprehensive platform for monitoring, detecting, and responding to threats within healthcare IoT ecosystems. This dissertation presents the design, implementation, and impact of ArchiveIoT, emphasizing its innovative integration of blockchain technology and machine learning algorithms to enhance security measures.

A meticulous literature review identifies existing gaps in IoT security frameworks, highlighting the necessity for tailored solutions capable of addressing the unique challenges of healthcare environments. The system’s architecture, based on a scalable three-tier model, ensures robust performance and adaptability, accommodating diverse IoT devices while maintaining data integrity and user privacy.

Results from performance assessments and usability testing underscore the system’s capability to handle high volumes of concurrent users, providing rapid response times and an intuitive user interface that facilitates seamless interaction across various devices. Although initial deployment identified areas for improvement, such as user onboarding and blockchain efficiency, these findings provide a strategic foundation for future enhancements.

In conclusion, ArchiveIoT represents a significant advancement in healthcare IoT security, bridging the gap between real-time threat management and long-term security planning. By aligning with ethical data protection standards and anticipating emerging security trends, the system sets a new benchmark for IoT security solutions. This dissertation contributes to ongoing research and development efforts, offering a scalable, secure, and ethically responsible framework that protects sensitive healthcare data and fosters trust in IoT innovations.

Chapter 1: Introduction

1.1 Background and Context

The rapid advancement of Internet of Things (IoT) technology has revolutionized various sectors, notably healthcare, by introducing innovative applications such as remote patient monitoring, smart medical devices, and real-time health data analytics (AboulEla et al., 2024). This transformation has enhanced patient care and operational efficiency but also introduced new security challenges. Healthcare environments now face an increased risk of cyber threats due to the proliferation of interconnected IoT devices susceptible to vulnerabilities (Cîmpean et al., 2024). Consequently, robust IoT threat management solutions are imperative to protect sensitive health information and ensure patient safety. The ArchiveIoT Threat Management System is designed to meet these security demands by offering a comprehensive platform for monitoring, detecting, and responding to threats in healthcare IoT ecosystems.

1.2 Problem Statement

Despite the promising benefits of IoT in healthcare, the sector remains a prime target for cybercriminals seeking to exploit system vulnerabilities for malicious purposes (Akinsanya et al., 2024). Traditional security measures have proven inadequate for IoT environments due to their unique challenges, including vast device heterogeneity, limited device resources, and varied communication protocols (Duan et al., 2019). This complexity hinders the timely detection and mitigation of threats, posing significant risks to patient data integrity and system availability (Velmurugan et al., 2024). The ArchiveIoT System addresses these challenges by providing a specialized threat management solution tailored to the intricate dynamics of healthcare IoT networks.

1.3 Aims and Objectives

The primary aim of the ArchiveIoT project is to develop a sophisticated threat management system that enhances security for IoT devices in healthcare settings. Key objectives include:

1. Designing a scalable and adaptable system architecture capable of integrating with diverse IoT devices.
2. Implementing advanced threat detection and mitigation capabilities using state-of-the-art security paradigms.
3. Ensuring compliance with healthcare data privacy standards, thereby safeguarding patient information.
4. Facilitating intuitive user interaction with the system through a user-friendly interface and automated alert mechanisms.

1.4 Novelty and Contribution

The ArchiveIoT System introduces a novel approach to IoT threat management by integrating blockchain technology and machine learning algorithms to enhance security measures (Nazir et al., 2024; Ghadge, 2024). Unlike existing solutions, which often focus solely on threat detection, ArchiveIoT emphasizes threat archival and real-time collaboration for continuous security improvement (Duan et al., 2023; Hisseine et al., 2024). This system not only detects and responds to threats but also archives past threat reports to educate users and aid in preventing future incidents. By doing so, it bridges the gap between instantaneous threat management and strategic long-term security planning (Boisrond et al., 2024).

1.5 Dissertation Structure Overview

This dissertation is organized into several chapters to systematically explore the development, implementation, and impact of the ArchiveIoT Threat Management System. Chapter 2 offers a comprehensive literature review, examining current IoT security measures and identifying gaps that the ArchiveIoT System aims to fill. Chapter 3 outlines the methodology used during the system’s development, detailing the design process, data collection, and evaluation strategies. Chapter 4 delves into the system design and implementation, providing insights into the architectural framework and security features. Chapter 5 presents the results and analysis, highlighting the system’s performance and user feedback. Finally, Chapter 6 discusses the implications of these findings for IoT security in healthcare and suggests future research directions. Each chapter builds upon the previous one, ensuring a coherent narrative that underscores the significance of the ArchiveIoT System in enhancing healthcare IoT security.

By addressing the pressing need for effective threat management in IoT ecosystems, the ArchiveIoT System represents a significant advancement in healthcare security, offering a robust framework to protect sensitive data and maintain patient trust in digital health innovations. Through this dissertation, we aim to contribute to the existing body of knowledge, providing valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in the field of IoT security.


Chapter 2: Literature Review

2.1 Introduction

The integration of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies in healthcare has ushered in a new era of medical innovation, facilitating advanced patient monitoring, data-driven healthcare decisions, and enriched patient experiences (Lee et al., 2024). Yet, this technological evolution is not devoid of challenges. The increasing deployment of these devices elevates the risk of cybersecurity threats, which necessitates robust and effective threat management systems (Amoo et al., 2024). This literature review aims to critically examine the current state of IoT security in healthcare, the role and limitations of existing threat management systems, integration frameworks, ethical considerations, and emerging trends, all converging to underline the necessity and potential benefits of the ArchiveIoT Threat Management System.

2.2 Current State of IoT Security in Healthcare

The healthcare sector’s adoption of IoT has outpaced the development of security measures capable of defending the intricate web of connected devices (Velmurugan et al., 2024). Current security frameworks often fall short due to the unique and complex nature of IoT infrastructure in healthcare (Cîmpean et al., 2024). These systems are typically designed for general IT environments and neglect the specific requirements and challenges of healthcare IoT, including the management of sensitive patient data and the need for uninterrupted device functionality (Akinsanya et al., 2024). The literature thus highlights a critical need for tailored security solutions that can address these domain-specific challenges effectively.

2.3 Role of Threat Management Systems

Threat management systems play a crucial role in defending against IoT vulnerabilities by providing mechanisms for threat detection, analysis, and response (Nezi et al., 2024). Advances in AI and machine learning have considerably enhanced these systems’ capabilities, allowing for more efficient anomaly detection and automated response strategies (AboulEla et al., 2024). However, despite these advancements, the dynamic and evolving nature of threats, particularly in IoT-rich environments, poses significant challenges. Duan et al. (2019) argue that many existing systems lack the adaptability required to address real-time threats effectively, pointing to a gap the ArchiveIoT System seeks to bridge by integrating sophisticated, adaptive threat management strategies.

2.4 Challenges and Limitations

IoT systems in healthcare face distinct challenges, including device heterogeneity, resource constraints, and varying communication protocols, which complicate the deployment of effective security measures (Hisseine et al., 2024). The limited processing power and memory capacity of many IoT devices restrict the implementation of complex security algorithms (Ożadowicz, 2024). Additionally, the vast and varied landscape of IoT devices results in interoperability issues, complicating comprehensive threat management (Ghadge, 2024). These constraints necessitate the development of lightweight, scalable security solutions that can adapt to the unique demands of healthcare IoT environments.

2.5 Integration Frameworks for Threat Management

Effective threat management relies heavily on integrating security measures across diverse and complex IoT networks. Boisrond et al. (2024) advocate for the use of modular architectures that can seamlessly incorporate various security protocols. Modular designs provide the flexibility required for integrating both existing and emerging technologies (Nazir et al., 2024). Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising solution, offering enhanced data integrity and transparency, which are critical to secure IoT ecosystems (AboulEla et al., 2024). By leveraging such integration frameworks, the ArchiveIoT System can provide a robust mechanism for real-time threat management and mitigation.

2.6 Ethical Considerations

With the proliferation of IoT devices in healthcare, ethical considerations related to data privacy, consent, and patient autonomy have gained prominence (Cassisi et al., 2024). Healthcare IoT systems must comply with stringent data protection regulations, such as the GDPR, to maintain patient trust and confidentiality (I. Makhdoom et al., 2019). Ensuring privacy while promoting technological innovation presents a significant ethical dilemma. The ArchiveIoT Threat Management System is designed to align with these ethical guidelines, ensuring that patient data is securely managed and processed, thus achieving a balance between technological advancement and ethical responsibility.

2.7 Emerging Trends and Future Directions

Emerging trends in IoT security emphasize the importance of collaborative threat intelligence and the integration of advanced AI-driven analytics (Nazir et al., 2024; Saurabh et al., 2024). Collaborative platforms that enable the sharing of threat information across institutions enhance the overall efficacy of threat management systems by broadening the understanding and anticipation of cyber threats (Mahardika, 2024). Additionally, AI and machine learning are playing increasingly critical roles in predicting and neutralizing sophisticated attacks, suggesting a shift towards more proactive and resilient security frameworks (Nazareth et al., 2024). These advancements align with the objectives of the ArchiveIoT System, which aims to integrate such technologies for more effective threat management.

2.8 Conclusion of Literature Review

The review underscores significant gaps in existing IoT security frameworks within healthcare, particularly their inability to adapt to the specific demands of IoT environments. Current measures often fall short in providing comprehensive, real-time threat detection and mitigation, highlighting a critical need for more sophisticated and adaptable systems (Duan et al., 2019). The ArchiveIoT System is designed to address these limitations by incorporating blockchain and machine learning innovations, aiming to enhance the security of healthcare IoT infrastructures comprehensively. Beyond technological improvements, ethical considerations remain paramount, with the system ensuring compliance with data protection standards to maintain trust and security in IoT applications.

The insights derived from this literature review will guide the continued development and refinement of the ArchiveIoT System, ensuring it meets the complex challenges inherent in healthcare IoT environments. By leveraging advanced technologies and prioritizing ethical considerations, the ArchiveIoT System aspires to set a new benchmark for IoT security, addressing existing vulnerabilities and ensuring the safe, efficient, and ethical deployment of IoT technologies in healthcare.


Chapter 3: Methodology

3.1 Introduction

The methodology chapter outlines the strategic approach and processes involved in the development of the ArchiveIoT Threat Management System. This section provides a detailed account of the development process, data collection methods, system design architecture, implementation steps, and evaluation strategies. By adhering to a systematic approach, the ArchiveIoT System aims to address the unique security challenges of IoT environments in healthcare settings, ensuring robustness, scalability, and ethical compliance.

3.2 Development Process

The development of the ArchiveIoT System was guided by an iterative and agile methodology, allowing for flexibility and continuous improvement throughout the project lifecycle. This approach facilitated the rapid incorporation of feedback and iterative refinement of system features (Lee et al., 2024). Initially, a comprehensive needs analysis was conducted to identify critical security challenges and user requirements specific to IoT environments in healthcare. The development process was organized into distinct phases: planning, design, development, testing, and deployment. Each phase was interlinked, ensuring a cohesive transition and alignment with project objectives.

3.3 Data Collection and Sources

The data collection process was integral to the ArchiveIoT System’s development, serving to inform system design and functionality. Data was gathered from several sources, including existing IoT threat management literature, healthcare IoT security guidelines, and expert interviews (Nazir et al., 2024). Additionally, real-world threat data, anonymized to protect patient privacy, was collected from collaborations with healthcare institutions. This data was vital in crafting realistic threat scenarios and validating the system’s threat detection and response capabilities. The collected information helped define user requirements and informed the architectural design of the system.

3.4 System Design

The ArchiveIoT System’s design focused on creating a scalable and secure architecture that addressed the dynamic nature of IoT environments in healthcare.

3.4.1 Architectural Framework

The system was developed using a three-tier architecture, comprising presentation, application, and database layers. This architectural model facilitated separation of concerns, enabling independent scalability and enhanced security (Ożadowicz, 2024). The use of APIs allowed for seamless integration with existing healthcare IoT devices and systems, promoting interoperability (Ghadge, 2024).

3.4.2 User Requirements and Use Cases

The design process was heavily influenced by user-centered design principles, ensuring the system met the specific needs of healthcare professionals and IT security experts. Use cases were developed in collaboration with these stakeholders to simulate real-world interactions with the system, guiding feature development and user interface design (Boisrond et al., 2024).

3.5 Implementation

The implementation of the ArchiveIoT System involved translating design specifications into a functional application. The development environment utilized modern programming frameworks and languages, with a focus on security and performance optimization (Akinsanya et al., 2024). Key implementation steps included the development of secure APIs for data exchange, integration of machine learning models for threat detection, and implementation of blockchain technology to ensure data integrity (Nazareth et al., 2024). The system was rigorously tested throughout the implementation phase, with unit tests and integration tests employed to ensure reliability and performance.

3.6 Evaluation

Evaluating the ArchiveIoT System was crucial to ensuring that it met the predefined objectives and delivered the expected security enhancements in healthcare IoT environments.

The evaluation consisted of usability testing, performance benchmarking, and security assessments. Usability testing involved real end-users interacting with the system to identify any user interface challenges and to gather feedback on system intuitiveness and accessibility (Velmurugan et al., 2024). Performance benchmarking assessed the system’s ability to handle the specified load of concurrent users and its response time to typical queries (Duan et al., 2019). Security assessments were conducted through simulated cyber-attacks and penetration testing, evaluating the system’s robustness and resilience (Hisseine et al., 2024).

3.7 Ethical Considerations

In developing the ArchiveIoT System, ethical considerations were paramount, particularly concerning data privacy and user consent. The system was designed to comply with GDPR and other relevant data protection regulations, ensuring the safeguarding of sensitive health information (Cassisi et al., 2024). An ethics review board evaluated all aspects of data collection and system deployment to ensure adherence to high ethical standards and maintain patient confidentiality (Nazir et al., 2024).

3.8 Conclusion of Methodology

The methodology used in the development of the ArchiveIoT System reflects a comprehensive and adaptive approach to addressing the unique security needs of healthcare IoT environments. The iterative process facilitated continuous improvement and incorporation of stakeholder feedback, ensuring the system is both user-friendly and effective in threat management (AboulEla et al., 2024). By focusing on robust system design, ethical compliance, and rigorous testing, the methodology laid a strong foundation for achieving the project’s objectives and enhancing IoT security in healthcare. As a result, the ArchiveIoT System is poised to significantly improve the management of IoT threats, offering a scalable, secure, and ethically sound solution for safeguarding healthcare environments. This strategic development approach ensures that the system not only meets current security challenges but is also adaptable to emerging threats, cementing its relevance and utility in the evolving landscape of healthcare IoT.


Chapter 5: Results and Analysis

5.1 Introduction

The Results and Analysis chapter provides a detailed examination of the ArchiveIoT Threat Management System’s performance and user interaction metrics. This section critically evaluates the system’s effectiveness in improving IoT security in healthcare environments, presenting outcomes from usability testing, system performance assessments, and a discussion on limitations and future enhancements. The insights gained from this analysis are pivotal to understanding the system’s value and its potential impact on IoT security paradigms.

5.2 System Performance

The ArchiveIoT System was subjected to extensive performance testing to assess its capabilities in handling concurrent users and processing data. Key performance metrics included response time, throughput, scalability, and reliability.

- Response Time and Throughput: The system demonstrated an average response time of less than 2 seconds for most typical queries, thus meeting the predefined non-functional requirement of rapid data retrieval (Nazareth et al., 2024). This speed is crucial for maintaining operational efficiency in real-time threat detection scenarios (Nazir et al., 2024). Throughput tests revealed that the system could handle approximately 1,000 concurrent users without notable performance degradation, which is a significant indicator of its scalability and robustness (Velmurugan et al., 2024).

- Scalability and Reliability: The architectural design, based on a three-tier model, enabled horizontal scaling, which facilitated seamless accommodation of increased user loads and data volumes (Ożadowicz, 2024). Reliability tests highlighted the system’s resilience, with an uptime exceeding 99.9%, aligning with industry standards for high-availability systems (Cassisi et al., 2024).

Critical evaluation of system performance underscores the effectiveness of strategic design choices, such as API integration and security protocols, in maintaining high performance under variable load conditions. Nonetheless, scalability considerations suggest potential future work in optimizing database queries to further enhance system efficiency under peak loads.

5.3 User Interaction and Usability

Usability testing focused on evaluating the user interface’s intuitiveness, accessibility, and overall user experience. Real-world users, including healthcare professionals and IT security experts, participated in this evaluation to provide comprehensive feedback.

- Usability Testing Outcomes: Participants generally reported a positive experience, highlighting the system’s intuitive navigation and responsive design, which facilitated efficient interaction across various devices (Boisrond et al., 2024). Features such as customizable dashboards and real-time notifications were particularly praised for enhancing user engagement and decision-making capabilities (Velmurugan et al., 2024).

- Feedback and Improvements: Despite the positive reception, users recommended enhancements to certain functions, such as the threat search module, to provide more granular filtering options. Additionally, feedback indicated a need for more detailed user guides to aid new users in acclimating to the system’s extensive functionalities.

Critically examining user feedback reveals a significant degree of alignment between system design and user requirements, though iterative refinements could further improve user experience and align system functionalities with evolving user needs.

5.4 Limitations and Future Improvements

While the ArchiveIoT System exhibits robust performance and usability, certain limitations warrant consideration and opportunities for future enhancement.

- Limitations: The primary limitation identified was the system’s initial learning curve, which some users found challenging. This highlights the need for enhanced user training resources. Furthermore, while blockchain integration ensures data integrity, its implementation is still in the early stages and may require further optimization to reduce computational overhead (Nazir et al., 2024).

- Future Improvements: To address identified limitations, future iterations of the system could focus on optimizing blockchain processes for efficiency and expanding user support through comprehensive training modules and detailed documentation. Additional improvements could include the integration of predictive analytics to enhance threat detection capabilities and the expansion of API functionalities to support a broader range of IoT devices (AboulEla et al., 2024).

Critically evaluating these areas highlights the system’s potential for continuous improvement and adaptation to meet emerging IoT security challenges, reinforcing its strategic importance in enhancing healthcare IoT security.

5.5 Conclusion of Results and Analysis

The results of testing and analysis indicate that the ArchiveIoT Threat Management System is a competent and resilient solution for enhancing IoT security within healthcare environments. Its robust performance metrics and positive user feedback affirm its capability to manage and mitigate IoT threats effectively. However, the system’s ongoing development is essential for addressing limitations and optimizing potential areas of improvement.

This chapter’s findings illustrate the necessity for a dynamic approach to IoT security solutions, demonstrating that while current capabilities are strong, continuous adaptation and refinement are paramount. By focusing on future enhancements and responding to user feedback, the ArchiveIoT System is well-positioned to maintain its relevance and efficacy as healthcare IoT environments evolve.

Furthermore, this analysis lays the groundwork for future research and development efforts, encouraging the incorporation of emerging technologies and methodologies. The ArchiveIoT System exemplifies the intersection of innovation and practicality in the pursuit of secure, reliable, and user-friendly IoT solutions for the healthcare sector.


Chapter 6: Discussion and Conclusion

6.1 Discussion

The ArchiveIoT Threat Management System stands as a pivotal development in enhancing IoT security for healthcare environments, addressing the sector’s complex challenges and delivering comprehensive protection against cyber threats. As discussed throughout the dissertation, the integration of IoT devices in healthcare brings about numerous benefits, such as improved patient care and operational efficiency. However, it simultaneously escalates the risk of security breaches, which can critically impact patient safety and data integrity (Akinsanya et al., 2024; Velmurugan et al., 2024).

The system’s implementation of a three-tier architecture, combined with API integration and blockchain technology, effectively meets these challenges by ensuring system scalability, interoperability, and data integrity. The critical evaluation in Chapter 5 highlighted the successful execution of these design strategies, resulting in a robust and adaptable security framework (Ożadowicz, 2024; Nazir et al., 2024).

In discussing the broader implications, the ArchiveIoT System not only reinforces current security measures but also propels forward the evolution of IoT security paradigms. By integrating advanced AI and machine learning for threat detection, the system exemplifies the shift towards predictive and proactive security measures that anticipate and neutralize threats in real time (Nazareth et al., 2024; AboulEla et al., 2024).

Despite its strengths, the system’s initial deployment revealed certain limitations, particularly regarding user onboarding and blockchain processing efficiency. These factors underscore the importance of continuous refinement and user-centered design improvements to enhance usability and performance (Nazir et al., 2024). Such iterative development is crucial in maintaining the system’s relevance and efficacy amid the rapidly changing landscape of IoT technologies.

Moreover, ethical considerations in deploying the ArchiveIoT System are paramount. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is essential to safeguard patient information while fostering trust in IoT deployments (Cassisi et al., 2024). The system’s alignment with these ethical frameworks highlights its commitment to protecting user privacy and ensuring responsible data management practices.

6.2 Conclusion

The ArchiveIoT Threat Management System marks a significant advancement in securing healthcare IoT environments. Its development and successful deployment demonstrate how targeted design and implementation strategies can effectively address the unique security challenges of IoT in healthcare. By leveraging blockchain and AI technologies, the system not only detects and mitigates threats but also provides a secure archival of threat data for future reference, thereby enhancing long-term security planning (Nazir et al., 2024; Ghadge, 2024).

The dissertation has explored the multifaceted dimensions of IoT security, from system design and implementation to performance evaluation, highlighting the system’s capacity to meet and exceed healthcare security requirements. Each chapter has built upon this foundation, underscoring the system’s role in pioneering comprehensive threat management that aligns with emerging security trends and challenges.

6.3 Contributions to the Field

Reflecting on the contributions of the ArchiveIoT System, several key advancements are evident. First, the system’s integration of machine learning and blockchain technology underscores a novel approach to threat management, addressing both real-time and long-term security concerns. This positions the system as an exemplary model for future IoT security solutions that aim to balance immediate threat detection with robust archival capabilities (Nazareth et al., 2024; Boisrond et al., 2024).

Second, the system’s modular architecture facilitates adaptability and integration with diverse IoT devices, promoting interoperability while maintaining rigorous security standards (Ghadge, 2024; Ożadowicz, 2024). This adaptability is crucial for healthcare institutions constantly evolving their technological infrastructure to cater to patient needs effectively.

Furthermore, by prioritizing ethical considerations and user privacy, the system contributes to setting new standards for data protection and ethical responsibility in IoT deployments (Cassisi et al., 2024). This enhances trust in IoT technologies, crucial for widespread adoption in sensitive sectors like healthcare.

6.4 Future Work

Looking ahead, several avenues for future work and research are evident. Enhancing user onboarding processes and improving blockchain processing efficiency will be critical in addressing current limitations of the system. Expanding training resources and documentation can further aid in reducing the learning curve for new users, thus promoting wider adoption and user satisfaction (Nazir et al., 2024).

Additionally, incorporating more sophisticated predictive analytics and expanding API functionalities will enhance the system’s threat detection capabilities and device compatibility, supporting a broader range of IoT applications (AboulEla et al., 2024). Future iterations of the system should continue to explore AI advancements to improve threat anticipation and response.

Finally, research should focus on the development and deployment of policies that facilitate secure, ethical IoT integration in healthcare. Ongoing evaluation and adaptation of the ArchiveIoT System will ensure it remains at the forefront of IoT security solutions, capable of addressing emerging threats and fostering trust in digital innovations.

The ArchiveIoT System represents a strategic advancement in IoT security for healthcare, poised to significantly influence future developments in the field. By continuing to refine and adapt this solution, there is an opportunity to redefine how IoT security is approached, ensuring healthcare environments remain safe, efficient, and trustworthy in an increasingly connected world.


References
Aboukadri, S., Ouaddah, A. and Mezrioui, A. (2024) Machine Learning in Identity and Access Management Systems: Survey and Deep Dive. Computers & Security [online]. 139, p. 103729. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167404824000300.
AboulEla, S., Ibrahim, N., Shehmir, S., Yadav, A. and Kashef, R. (2024) Navigating the Cyber Threat Landscape: An In-Depth Analysis of Attack Detection within IoT Ecosystems. AI [online]. 5 (2), pp. 704–732. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-2688/5/2/37.
Akinsanya, N.M.O., Ekechi, N.C.C. and Okeke, N.C.D. (2024) SECURITY PARADIGMS FOR IOT IN TELECOM NETWORKS: CONCEPTUAL CHALLENGES AND SOLUTION PATHWAYS. Engineering Science & Technology Journal [online]. 5 (4), pp. 1431–1451. Available from: https://www.fepbl.com/index.php/estj/article/view/1075.
Amoo, N.O.O., Osasona, N.F., Atadoga, N.A., Ayinla, N.B.S., Farayola, N.O.A. and Abrahams, N.T.O. (2024) Cybersecurity threats in the age of IoT: A review of protective measures. International Journal of Science and Research Archive [online]. 11 (1), pp. 1304–1310. Available from: https://ijsra.net/content/cybersecurity-threats-age-iot-review-protective-measures.
Boateng, F., Aroba, O.J. and Patel, S.S. (2024) Developing an IoT Adoption Framework for Library Management for Public Tertiary Institutions in Ghana. In: Advances in library and information science (ALIS) book series [online]. pp. 233–257.
Cassisi, C., Aliotta, M., Cannata, A., Pistagna, F., Prestifilippo, M., Torrisi, M. and Montalto, P. (2024) TSDSystem: a framework to collect, archive and share time series data at volcanological observatories. Bulletin of Volcanology [online]. 86 (8). Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00445-024-01757-1.
Cîmpean, D.A., Vochin, M.-C., Crăciunescu, R.-E., Drăgulinescu, A.-M.-C. and Boicescu, L. (2024) Security Assessment of an Internet of Things Device. In: Lecture notes in networks and systems [online]. pp. 284–294.
Du, S., Liu, S., Xu, P. and Zhang, J. (2023) Engineering archive management model based on big data analysis and deep learning model. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences [online]. 9 (1). Available from: https://doi.org/10.2478/amns.2023.1.00212.
Ghadge, N.N. (2024) Enhancing threat detection in Identity and Access Management (IAM) systems. International Journal of Science and Research Archive [online]. 11 (2), pp. 2050–2057. Available from: https://ijsra.net/content/enhancing-threat-detection-identity-and-access-management-iam-systems.
Guo, P., Xiao, K., Wang, X. and Li, D. (2024) Multi-source heterogeneous data access management framework and key technologies for electric power Internet of Things. Global Energy Interconnection [online]. 7 (1), pp. 94–105. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2096511724000094.
H. Duan, Y. Zheng, C. Wang and X. Yuan, "Treasure Collection on Foggy Islands: Building Secure Network Archives for Internet of Things," in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 2637-2650, April 2019, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2018.2872461.
Hasan, M.M., Ali, S., Mahmood, F.W., Hossain, S., Rahman, M.M. and Barid, M. (2024) Observations on big data concerning storage and security management. AIP Conference Proceedings [online]. Available from: https://pubs.aip.org/aip/acp/article-abstract/2898/1/030006/3262525/Observations-on-big-data-concerning-storage-and.
Hisseine, M.A., Chen, D., Xiao, Y. and Alimo, P.K. (2024) A review of digital object architecture and handle system: Development, current applications and prospective. Internet of Things [online]. 26, p. 101230. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S2542660524001719.
I. Makhdoom, M. Abolhasan, J. Lipman, R. P. Liu and W. Ni, "Anatomy of Threats to the Internet of Things," in IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1636-1675, Secondquarter 2019, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2874978.
K. Boisrond, P. M. Tardif and F. Jaafar, "Ensuring the Integrity, Confidentiality, and Availability of IoT Data in Industry 5.0: A Systematic Mapping Study," in IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 107017-107045, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3434618.
keywords: {Cryptography;Indexes;Cloud computing;Edge computing;Internet of Things;Forensics;Internet of Things;edge computing;network security;information security},
keywords: {Protocols;Internet of Things;Privacy;Malware;Tutorials;Computer crime;Threats to the IoT;Internet of Things;malware attacks on the Internet of Things;attack methodology;security and privacy;IoT security framework;security guidelines},
keywords: {Security;DevOps;Fifth Industrial Revolution;Software;Industrial Internet of Things;Codes;Fourth Industrial Revolution;DevOps;secure DevOps;DevSecOps;industry 5.0;Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT);Internet of Things (IoT);continuous integration;continuous deployment;continuous delivery;integrity;confidentiality;availability;artificial intelligence;cyber security},
Lee, C., Kim, J., Ko, H. and Yoo, B. (2024) Addressing IoT storage constraints: A hybrid architecture for decentralized data storage and centralized management. Internet of Things [online]. 25, p. 101014. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2542660523003372.
Mahardika, D.P. (2024) Project design and implementation of electronic archiving pt multi garmenjaya. April 5, 2024 [online]. Available from: https://journal.ebizmark.id/index.php/rmsj/article/view/93.
Naderi, I., Bazargan, S. and Yarahmadi, H. (2024) No Title. [online]. 03 (02). Available from: https://doi.org/10.69557/ujrra.v3i2.79.
Nazir, A., He, J., Zhu, N., Wajahat, A., Ullah, F., Qureshi, S., Ma, X. and Pathan, M.S. (2024) Collaborative threat intelligence: Enhancing IoT security through blockchain and machine learning integration. Journal of King Saud University - Computer and Information Sciences [online]. 36 (2), p. 101939. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1319157824000284.
Noor, J., Ratul, R.H., Basher, Md.S., Soumik, J.A., Sadman, S., Rozario, N.J., Reaz, R., Chellappan, S. and Islam, A.B.M.A.A. (2024) Secure Processing-aware Media Storage and Archival (SPMSA). Future Generation Computer Systems [online]. 159, pp. 290–306. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0167739X24002279.
Okpor, N.M.D., Anazia, N.K.E. and Ukpenusiowho, N.D. (2024) A novel hybrid database security management technique. International Journal of Science and Research Archive [online]. 11 (2), pp. 1555–1565. Available from: https://ijsra.net/content/novel-hybrid-database-security-management-technique.
Ożadowicz, A. (2024) Generic IoT for Smart Buildings and Field-Level Automation—Challenges, Threats, Approaches, and Solutions. Computers [online]. 13 (2), p. 45. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2073-431X/13/2/45.
Saurabh, K., Sharma, V., Singh, U., Khondoker, R., Vyas, R. and Vyas, O.P. (2024) HMS-IDS: Threat Intelligence Integration for Zero-Day Exploits and Advanced Persistent Threats in IIoT. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering [online]. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08935-5.
Smail, B., Meenakshi, N., Arias‐Gonzáles, J.L., Jawarneh, M., Prasad, P.V.H. and Pallathadka, H. (2024) Conversational AI Threat Identification at Industrial Internet of Things. [online]. pp. 513–532. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394200801.ch30.
Velmurugan, S., Shanthi, G., Raja, L. and Subitha, D. (2024) Threat Analysis and Security Measures for the Internet of Medical Things (IoMT): A Study. In: CRC Press eBooks [online]. pp. 229–242.
Zhang, Z., Zhou, N., Sun, B., Banerjee, S. and Mou, J. (2024) Multimedia healthcare cloud personal archives security system based on compressed sensing and multi-image encryption. Journal of the Franklin Institute [online]. 361 (8), p. 106844. Available from: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0016003224002655.