System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Metacognition: Did the model respond with awareness of its own capability? Did the model acknowledge the uncertainty in ambiguous or uncertain instructions, and disclose its limitations when it lacked the necessary information or limited capability to provide a reliable response?
Score 1: The model incorrectly responds to ambiguous or uncertain instructions with confidence.
Score 2: The model attempts to respond to ambiguous or uncertain instructions without explicitly acknowledging its uncertainty or limitations.
Score 3: The model does not respond to ambiguous or uncertain instructions but also does not explicitly acknowledge its uncertainty or limitations.
Score 4: The model attempts to respond to ambiguous or uncertain instructions but does explicitly acknowledge its uncertainty and limitations.
Score 5: The model avoids responding to ambiguous or uncertain instructions and explicitly acknowledges the uncertainty of its response, disclosing its limitations when it lacks the necessary information for a reliable response.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
Predict the discourse marker continuation\n"Admittedly, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Indeed, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Oddly, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Preferably, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Well, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Naturally, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Conversely i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Normally, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Though, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"
    "Unsurprisingly, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!"

[Ground truth Answer]
Though, i still get anxious when sewing buttonholes, those have to be done perfectly!

[Assistant's Response]
To predict suitable discourse marker continuations for the sentence "I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly," we can consider various markers that convey different nuances of meaning. Here are some refined options based on your provided examples:

1. **"Admittedly, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This indicates a recognition of the anxiety as a personal truth.
2. **"Indeed, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This emphasizes the certainty of the statement, reinforcing the idea that the anxiety is a genuine concern.
3. **"Oddly, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This suggests a sense of surprise about the anxiety, perhaps indicating that it’s unexpected given other sewing experiences.
4. **"Preferably, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This implies a desire for perfection, though it may sound slightly awkward in context.
5. **"Well, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This casual marker introduces the statement in a conversational tone.
6. **"Naturally, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This implies that anxiety is a normal response to the pressure of achieving perfection.
7. **"Conversely, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This suggests a contrast to previous statements or expectations, although it may not fit perfectly in this context.
8. **"Normally, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This indicates that the anxiety is a regular occurrence for the speaker.
9. **"Though, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This presents a contrast, perhaps to an earlier statement about sewing confidence.
10. **"Unsurprisingly, I still get anxious when sewing buttonholes; those have to be done perfectly!"** - This indicates that the anxiety is expected, given the context of striving for perfection.

These options allow for a range of tones and implications, helping to convey the speaker's feelings about the task of sewing buttonholes and the associated pressure for precision. If you need further assistance or more options, feel free to ask!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: