System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Given a real estate listing description, extract the information and details of the property from the text. The details consist of address, basic house attributes, etc.
Input: WALK TO THE BEACH FROM CAPITOLA KNOLLS! Single-level upstairs condo with your own large private deck overlooking nature. Adorable home that is move-in ready and waiting for you to put your own personal touches on. Gorgeous and well-maintained landscaped park-like setting with lush green grasses with a community pool and spa to enjoy. Desirable location...walk to Capitola Village, Gayle's Bakery, restaurants, shopping, schools or jump on Hwy 1 right around the corner.

[Ground truth Answer]
-Address: "Capitola"
-Type of home: Condo
-Location: "walk to Capitola Village, Gayle's Bakery, restaurants, shopping, and schools or jump on Hwy 1 right around the corner."
-House attributes: "Single-level upstairs, large private deck overlooking nature, move-in ready home"
-Outdoor details: "well-maintained landscaped park-like setting with lush green grasses with a Community pool and spa"

[Assistant's Response]
Based on the provided real estate listing description, here is a synthesized extraction of the key information regarding the property:

- **Address**: Capitola Knolls (specific address not provided)
- **Property Type**: Single-level upstairs condo
- **Key Features**:
  - Large private deck with views of nature
  - Move-in ready condition, allowing for personal customization
  - Beautifully landscaped park-like setting with lush greenery
  - Access to a community pool and spa
- **Location Highlights**:
  - Within walking distance to Capitola Village
  - Close proximity to Gayle's Bakery, various restaurants, shopping centers, and schools
  - Convenient access to Highway 1

This property offers a desirable blend of comfort, community amenities, and an ideal location for those who appreciate both nature and urban conveniences. If you have any further questions or need additional information, feel free to ask!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: