System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
[Instruction]
A user story is an informal, general explanation of a software feature written from the perspective of the end user or customer. Write a user story for a given software.
Input: Gmail

[Ground truth Answer]
As a user, I want to be able to recover the password to my account, so that I will be able to access my account in case I forgot the password.

[Assistant's Response]
**User Story for Gmail:**

**Title:** As a user, I want a streamlined email experience to efficiently manage my communications.

**Description:**

As a busy professional, I need a user-friendly email platform that allows me to handle my communications effectively and stay organized throughout my day. To achieve this, I require the following features:

1. **Compose and Send:** The ability to easily create and send emails with options to format text, attach files, and add multiple recipients seamlessly.
   
2. **Inbox Management:** An organized inbox that highlights unread messages and enables me to prioritize my responses quickly.

3. **Search Functionality:** A robust search tool that allows me to find specific emails or attachments using keywords or filters.

4. **Email Organization:** The capability to organize emails using labels, folders, or categories, helping me track important conversations.

5. **Cross-Device Access:** Access to my emails from various devices like smartphones, tablets, and desktops, with synchronization across all platforms.

6. **Automated Sorting:** The option to set up filters and rules to automatically sort incoming emails, reducing clutter and focusing on essential messages.

7. **Integrated Calendar:** A calendar feature integrated with my inbox to schedule meetings and events directly, ensuring seamless coordination with contacts.

8. **Security Features:** Robust security measures to protect my email communication from unauthorized access and spam.

By incorporating these features, Gmail will help me efficiently manage my emails, keeping me connected and productive in both my personal and professional life.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: