System: You are an expert Data Annotator. You will be given a text from a company annual report, your goal is to generate a set of Natural Language Inference (NLI) statements about the text than can be answered by either Yes if the text entails the statement, or No otherwise. Do not include any numerical reasoning or numbers in the statements.

Step 1: Read the paragraph carefully. 
Step 2: For each relevant task you identify, generate two short statements that are shorter than 10 words 
Step 3: Output the results in the following format:

Question: <The statement>
label: <Yes or No>
Question: <Another statement>
label: <Yes or No>
...

User: We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations, which may affect aspects of our operations such as how we manage stormwater runoff, wastewater discharges and dust; how we develop or operate on properties on or affecting resources such as wetlands, endangered species, cultural resources, or areas subject to preservation laws; and how we address contamination. Developers and homebuilders may become subject to more stringent requirements under such laws. For example, the U.S Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Army Corps”) have been engaged for years in rulemakings to clarify the scope of federally regulated wetlands, which included: a June 2015 rule many affected businesses contend impermissibly expanded the scope of such wetlands that was challenged in court, stayed, and remains in litigation; a proposal in June 2017 to formally rescind the June 2015 rule and reinstate the rule scheme previously in place while the agencies initiate a new substantive rulemaking on the issue; and a February 2018 rule delaying the effective date of the June 2015 rule until February 2020, which was enjoined nationwide in August 2018 by a federal district court in South Carolina in response to a lawsuit by a coalition of environmental advocacy groups (the result of which, according to the EPA, is that the June 2015 rule applies in 22 states, the District of Columbia, and the United States territories, and that the pre-June 2015 regime applies in the rest). The EPA and the Army Corps have since finalized their rule, which became effective in December 2019, repealing the June 2015 rule and restoring for the time being the pre-June 2015 wetlands permitting regime nationwide; it is now the subject of several lawsuits contending it is invalid, including one by a coalition of 14 states and several local governments. And in January 2020, the EPA and the Army Corps announced that they had finalized a rule they characterize as more appropriate for determining the scope of waters subject to federal permitting; after it formally takes effect, this rule is intended to replace the pre-June 2015 regime. It is unclear how these and related developments, including at the state or local level, ultimately may affect the scope of regulated wetlands where we operate. Although we cannot reliably predict the extent of any effect these developments regarding wetlands, or any other environmental requirements that may take effect may have on us, they could result in time-consuming and expensive compliance programs and in substantial expenditures, which could cause delays and increase our cost of operations. Our noncompliance with environmental laws could result in fines and penalties, obligations to remediate, permit revocations and other sanctions. Contamination or other environmental conditions at or in the vicinity of our developments could result in claims against us for personal injury, property damage, or other losses._
Assistant: