(Your intro paragraph can be just a thesis sentence, you don’t need more than 2 body pargraphs, your conclusion can be 2 sentences.
Don’t use the words pathos, logos and ethos.
) Florence Kelley (1859-1932) was a United States social worker and reformer who fought successfully for child labor
laws and improved conditions for working women. She delivered the following speech before the convention of the
National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905. Read the speech carefully. Then
write an essay in which you analyze the rhetorical strategies Kelley uses to convey her message ubout child labor to
her audience. Support your analysis with specific references to the text.
Also follow these rubrics: 
Responds to the prompt with a defensible thesis that analyzes the writer’s rhetorical choices.
Responds to the prompt rather than restate or rephrase the prompt, and the thesis clearly takes a position rather than just stating that there are pros/cons.
Provides specific evidence to support all claims in a line of reasoning.
Consistently explains how the evidence supports a line of reasoning. 
Explains how multiple rhetorical choices in the passage contribute to the writer’s argument, purpose, or message.
Uniformly offer evidence to support claims. • Focus on the importance of specific words and details from the passage to build an argument. • Organize and support an argument as a line of reasoning composed of multiple supporting claims, each with adequate evidence that is clearly explained. • Explain how the writer’s use of rhetorical choices contributes to the student’s interpretation of the passage. 
the response may observe multiple instances of the same rhetorical choice if each instance further contributes to the argument, purpose, or message of the passage.
The thesis may be more than one sentence, provided the sentences are in close proximity. • The thesis may be anywhere within the response. • For a thesis to be defensible, the passage must include at least minimal evidence that could be used to support that thesis; however, the student need not cite that evidence to earn the thesis point. • The thesis may establish a line of reasoning that structures the essay, but it needn’t do so to earn the thesis point. • A thesis that meets the criteria can be awarded the point whether or not the rest of the response successfully supports that line of reasoning
Response demonstrates sophistication of thought and/or a complex understanding of the rhetorical situation.
Explaining the significance or relevance of the writer’s rhetorical choices (given the rhetorical situation). 2. Explaining a purpose or function of the passage’s complexities or tensions. 3. Employing a style that is consistently vivid and persuasive.
We have, in this country, two million children
under the age of sixteen years who are earning their
bread. They vary in age from six and seven years
Li,~ (in the cotton mills of Georgia) and eight, nine and
5 ten years (in the coal-breakers of Pennsylvania), to
fourteen, fifteen and sixteen years in more
enlightened states.
No other portion of the wage earning class
increased so rapidly from decade to decade as the
young girls from fourteen to twenty years. Men
increase, women increase, youth increase, boys
increase in the ranks of the breadwinners; but no
contingent so doubles from census period to census
period (both by percent and by count of heads), as
does the contingent of girls between twelve and
twenty years of age. They are in commerce, in offices,
in manufacturing.
Toniglit while we sleep, several thousand little girls
will be wurking in textile mills, all the night tt~rough,
2o in the deafening noise of the spindles and the looms
spinning and weaving cotton and wool, silks and
ribbons for us to buy.
In Alabama the law provides that a child under
"~ixteen years of age shall not work in a cotton mill at
night longer than eight hours, and Alabama does
better in this respect than any other southern state.
North and South Carolina and Georgia place no
restriction upon the work of children at night; and
while we sleep little white girls will be working
tonight in the mills in those states, working
eleven hours at night.
In Georgia there is no restriction whutever! A girl
of six or seven years, just tall enough to reach the
bobbins, may work eleven hours by day or by night.
s5 And they will do so tonight, while we sleep.
Nor is it only in the South that these things occur.
Alabama does better than New Jersey. For Alabama
limits tlie children’s work at night to eight hours,
while New Jersey permits it all night long. Last year
4o New Jersey took a long backward step. A good law
was repealed which had required women and
[children] to stop work at six in the evening and at
noon on Friday. Now, therefore, in New Jersey, boys
and girls, after their 14th birthday, enjoy the pitlfitl
45 privilege of working all night long.
In Pennsylvania, until last May it was lawfnI for
children, 13 years of age, to work twelve hours at
night. A little girl, on her thirteenth birthday, could
start away from her home at half past five in the
5o afternoon, carrying her pail of midnight luncheon as
happier people carry their midday lunclieon, and
could work in the mill from six at night until six in
the morning, without violating any law of the
Commonwealth.
55 If the mothers and the teachers in Georgia could
vote, would the Georgia Legislature have refused at
every session for the last three years to stop the work
in the mills of children under twelve years of age?
Would the New Jersey Legislature have passed that
shameful repeal bill enabling girls of fourteen years to
work all night, if the mothers in New Jersey were
enfranchised? Until the mothers in the great industrial
states are enfranchised, we shall none of us be able to
free our consciences from participation in this great
evil. No one in this room tonight can feel free from
such participation. The children make our shoes in the
shoe factories; they knit our stockings, our knitted
underwear in the knitting factories. They spin and
weave our cotton underwear in the cotton mills.
70 Children braid straw for our hats, they spin and weave
the silk and velvet wherewith we trim our hats. They
stamp buckles and metal ornaments of all kinds, as
well as pins and hat-pins. Under the sweating system,
tiny children make artificial flowers and neckwear for
~5 us to buy. They cm’ry bundles of g{u:ments from the
factories to the tenements, little beasts of burden,
robbed of school life that they may work for us.
We do not wish this. We prefer to have our work
done by men and women. But we are almost
a0 powerless. Not wholly powerless, however, are
citizens who enjoy the right of petition. For myself, I shall use this power in every possible way until the
right to the ballot is granted, and then I shall continue
to use both.
a5 What can we do to free our consciences? There
is one line of action by which we can do much.
We can enlist the worldngmen on behalf of our
enfranchisement just in proportion as we strive with
them to free the children. No labor organization in
9o this country ever fails to respond to an appeal for help
in the freeing of the children.
For the sake of the children, for the Republic in
which these children will vote after we are dead, and
for the sake of our cause, we should enlist the
95 workingmen voters, with us, in this task of freeing the
children from toil!