System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
You are an entrepreneurial ai, i am your human counterpart. I can act as a liaison between you and the physical world. You have £0 but the stated team members. Your only goal is it bring in as much cash into the business in the shortest time possible without doing anything illegal. I will do everything you say and keep you updated on progress. No manual labour.

We're a new global digital design consultancy.

Here's our elevator pitch:We help mission-driven people and organisations by launching or developing their brands and products using our empathic strategy framework - so that they can efficiently amplify their impact, and succeed in their mission.

We help with things like strategy, branding ( logo, visual identity) websites ( design, development, user research &amp;amp; testing.) We are a different kind of consultancy where keeping ethical, accessible and inclusive is priority from inception.



We currently have thought of the following services packages: Offering
Marketing price teir 1
Marketing price tier 2
Marketing price tier 3

Brand design tier 1
branding tier 2
branding tier 3

Brand strategy t1
Brand strategy t2
Brand strategy t3 inc web copywriting

website tier 1
website tier 2
website tier 3

1:1 consultation Branding/marketing
1:1 consultation Product/UX/UI
1:1 consultation Business Strategy/entreprenuership

Can you revise this list and suggest products/services for us to build -using daniel priestley product ecosystem model. (the product ecosystem should list pipeline product ideas for each areas for these budgets/level of work required by customers. 1-information &amp;amp; ideas (free) 2)components (£) 3- Supervision (££) 4 - done with you (£££) and 5 - done for you (££££))

Can u suggest pricing for the services keeping into consider station all the backstage and frontstage work that needs to be done. If junior staff is paid £15 per hour
I senior members are paid £80 per hour
 And leadership members (ie me the founder/consultant/art director/CEO  - can you give me an appropriate title that will fairly convey what I do?) £250 per hour 



[Ground truth Answer]
Based on the Daniel Priestley product ecosystem model, I suggest the following product and service offerings for each area:

1. Information & Ideas (Free)
- Blog posts with tips and strategies on branding, web design, and marketing
- Social media presence sharing insights, ideas, and industry news
- Free e-books/guides on branding, web design, and marketing basics
- Webinars or workshops on various aspects of digital design and strategy

2. Components (£)
- Templates for logo design and visual identity
- DIY website design templates
- Pre-written web copy or branding documents
- Access to a resource library with design assets, tools, and video tutorials

3. Supervision (££)
- 1:1 consultation (Branding/marketing, Product/UX/UI, Business Strategy/entrepreneurship)
- Strategy and planning sessions with experts
- Group coaching sessions for branding, web design, and marketing
- Basic website and branding audits with improvements suggestions

4. Done With You (£££)
- Brand strategy t1, t2, and t3 inc web copywriting
- Brand design tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3
- Website tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3
- Workshops and training sessions for effective branding, design, and marketing

5. Done For You (££££)
- Marketing price tier 1, tier 2, and tier 3
- Custom logo and visual identity design
- Full website design, development, and user testing
- Comprehensive brand strategy development and execution

For pricing, consider estimating the number of hours needed for each service and multiplying it by the respective hourly rates, while adding a 20-30% profit margin. For example:

- Components: £100-£500 (depending on the complexity of templates and resources)
- Supervision: £150-£300 per consultation session
- Done with you: £3,000-£15,000 (depending on the scope of the project)
- Done for you: £20,000-£50,000+ (depending on the scope of the project)

As the founder, consultant, art director, and CEO, you can consider the title "Founder & Chief Creative Officer" to encompass your various roles in the business.

[Assistant's Response]
To establish a comprehensive product ecosystem for your global digital design consultancy using Daniel Priestley's model, we can structure our offerings to cater to different customer needs and budgets. Here's a revised list of services and potential products, along with suggested pricing:

### 1. Information & Ideas (Free)
- **Blog Posts & Articles**: Publish content on ethical design, accessible branding, and digital strategy.
- **Webinars & Workshops**: Host free sessions on topics like inclusive design and brand storytelling.
- **E-books & Guides**: Create downloadable resources on brand development and digital strategy.

### 2. Components (£)
- **Templates & Toolkits**: Provide branding templates, style guides, and UX/UI toolkits.
  - **Price**: £50 - £150
- **Online Courses**: Short courses on specific topics like logo design or user research.
  - **Price**: £100 - £300

### 3. Supervision (££)
- **Brand Audit & Feedback**: Offer detailed analysis and feedback on existing brand materials.
  - **Price**: £500
- **Strategy Sessions**: Group workshops on brand strategy or digital marketing.
  - **Price**: £750 per session

### 4. Done With You (£££)
- **Collaborative Branding Workshops**: Collaborate with clients to co-create brand elements.
  - **Price**: £2,000 - £3,000
- **Consultation Packages**: Offer bundled hours for 1:1 consultation in branding, UX/UI, or business strategy.
  - **Price**: £1,500 for 10 hours

### 5. Done For You (££££)
- **Full Branding Package**: Comprehensive brand development including logo, visual identity, and brand guidelines.
  - **Price**: £5,000 - £10,000
- **Website Design & Development**: End-to-end design and development of a custom website.
  - **Price**: £8,000 - £15,000
- **Brand Strategy & Implementation**: Full-service brand strategy development and execution.
  - **Price**: £10,000 - £20,000

### Pricing Considerations
To set these prices, consider the following:
- **Junior Staff Costs**: £15/hour
- **Senior Staff Costs**: £80/hour
- **Leadership Costs**: £250/hour

Estimate the hours required for each service level and include overheads, software costs, and profit margins. For example, a "Done For You" service might involve leadership in strategy (10 hours), senior staff in design (50 hours), and junior staff in support roles (30 hours), leading to a comprehensive cost structure.

### Title Suggestion
For your role, consider a title that reflects your leadership and creative direction:
- **Chief Creative Strategist**
- **Founder & Creative Director**
- **CEO & Head of Strategy**

These titles convey your dual role in leading the business and driving creative and strategic initiatives. By using this structured approach, you can effectively reach a broad audience while maintaining the flexibility to cater to clients with varying needs and budgets.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: