You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Richard Whittall:

The Globalist's Top Ten Books in 2016: The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer

Middle East Eye: "

The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer is one of the weightiest, most revelatory, original and important books written about sport"

“The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer has helped me immensely with great information and perspective.”

Bob Bradley, former US and Egyptian national coach: "James Dorsey’s The Turbulent World of Middle Eastern Soccer (has) become a reference point for those seeking the latest information as well as looking at the broader picture."

Alon Raab in The International Journal of the History of Sport: “Dorsey’s blog is a goldmine of information.”

Play the Game: "Your expertise is clearly superior when it comes to Middle Eastern soccer."

Andrew Das, The New York Times soccer blog Goal: "No one is better at this kind of work than James Dorsey"

David Zirin, Sports Illustrated: "Essential Reading"

Change FIFA: "A fantastic new blog'

Richard Whitall of A More Splendid Life:

"James combines his intimate knowledge of the region with a great passion for soccer"

Christopher Ahl, Play the Game: "An excellent Middle East Football blog"

James Corbett, Inside World Football

Monday, June 29, 2015

Countering political violence: Tackle the root causes

RSIS
Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant
commentary and analysis of topical issues and contemporary developments. The
views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position
of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries
may be reproduced electronically or in print with prior permission from RSIS
and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email: RSISPublications@ntu.edu.sgfor feedback to the
Editor RSIS Commentary, Yang Razali Kassim.

No. 145/2015 dated 29 June 2015

Countering political violence:Tackle the root causes

By James M. Dorsey

Synopsis

Nations across Europe, North Africa and Middle East have responded to recent
attacks in France, Tunisia and Kuwait with lofty condemnations of violent
extremism and kneejerk security measures that in isolation are unlikely to
solve what is becoming a festering problem. To drain the swamps of
radicalization, governments will have to embed security measures in policies
that give disaffected youth a stake in society.Commentary

EUROPEAN OFFICIALS, describing recruitment efforts by the Islamic State in
Bosnia Herzegovina, mired in a toxic mix of economic malaise and ethnic
tension, reportedly fear they may regret having failed to tackle the country’s
structural problems in the two decades since the end of the Yugoslav wars.

The regret could apply to any number of failures to tackle root problems that
have prompted lone wolves to strike fear in major European cities, at tourist
attractions in North Africa, and in Shiite mosques in the Gulf. They also
persuaded thousands of Europeans, Arabs and others to join the Islamic State as
foreign fighters; and tens of thousands to seek refuge in Europe from civil
war, brutal repression, and economic despair.

Band-aid solutions, knee
jerk responses

Across the board, democracies and autocracies alike are experiencing the
blowback of decades of Band-Aid solutions, policies that failed to give youth
prospects for a future with a stake in society, and repression largely
unchallenged by Western governments that pay lip service to adherence to
political pluralism, inclusiveness, and human and minority rights in various
parts of the world, particularly the Middle East and North Africa.

In the latest examples of kneejerk responses, Tunisia is deploying 1,000 armed
policemen to tourist sites even as tourists leave the country en masse, and
closing 80 mosques suspected of hosting radical clerics that is likely to push
militants further underground. Kuwait, which displayed a remarkable degree of
inclusivity with Sunnis and Shias joining hands in their condemnation of the
bombing of a Shiite mosque that left 27 people dead and more than 200 others
wounded, is mulling adoption of a stringent anti-terrorism law while France is
passing legislation that would authorise sweeping surveillance.

None of these measure address the sense of hopelessness that pervades predominantly
Muslim minorities in Europe and is reinforced by increased prejudice sparked by
violence and brutality perpetrated by Muslim extremists. That hopelessness is
matched by despair and existential fears among youth, minorities, and alienated
sects in the Middle East and North Africa.

In an article in the London Review of Books, Patrick Cockburn quoted a 29-year
old Syrian who fights for the Islamic State as saying: “We are fighting because
both the regime and the opposition failed us, so we need an armed organisation
to fight for our rights.” His words could just as well have been spoken by a
European or a fighter from anywhere else in the Arab world.

A display of cynicism
Rather than reducing political violence, more than a decade of war on terrorism
has produced ever more virulent forms of extremism and flows of refugees. The
WOT had framed efforts to counter radicalization and persuaded Western
governments to revert to support of Middle Eastern and North African autocrats
in the name of ensuring stability.

In a display of cynicism, Western governments have exploited their support of
autocracy to secure lucrative arms deals while failing to ensure levels of aid
that would credibly address social and economic malaise in a country like
Tunisia that is struggling with the transition from autocracy to democracy.

The result of exclusively security-focussed approaches coupled with the
exploitation of economic opportunity, is an increasingly insecure world in
which Western and regional powers have proven incapable of defeating non-state
actors like the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), multiple militant
militias in Libya, Islamist insurgents in Egypt’s Sinai, and rebel Houthis in
Yemen.

Said an Egyptian militant whose non-violent anti-government activism is as much
aimed at opposing the regime of general-turned-president Abdel Fattah Al Sisi
as it is designed to persuade increasingly frustrated youth that there are
alternatives to nihilistic violence: “The strategy of brutality, repression and
restricting freedom has failed to impose subservience. It hasn’t produced
solutions. Governments need to give people space. They need to prove that they
are capable of addressing the problems of a youth that has lost hope. We have
nothing to lose if they don’t”.

Shouldering responsibility

Meanwhile, European nations are struggling to cope with an onslaught of
refugees forced in part to flee their homelands by the policies of the very
autocracies the West supports. At the same time, those autocracies refused to absorb
some of those fleeing conflicts in for example Syria, Yemen and Iraq that they
have helped fuel.

Obviously, Western governments have a responsibility to put their own homes in
order by matching lofty words of inclusiveness with actions that address high
youth unemployment in migrant communities, lack of equal opportunity, and
ensure that minorities are embraced as full-fledged members of society rather
than perceived as a fifth column.

At the same time, Western governments would have to take a lead in pushing
Middle Eastern and North African autocrats to change or drop policies that fuel
radicalization and take measures that would address widespread grievances. Such
measures would include:

• A halt to the global propagation of intolerant ideologies by some Middle
Eastern governments and state-sponsored groups such as Saudi Arabia’s
interpretation of Wahhabism that contrasts starkly with that of Qatar, the
world’s only other Wahhabi state;

• Abolition of sectarianism in state rhetoric;

• Recognition of minority rights;

• Reform of brutal police and security forces that are widely feared and
despised;

• Granting of greater freedoms to ensure the existence of release valves for
pent-up anger and frustration and the unfettered voicing of grievances;

• A crackdown on corruption;

• Reform of education systems that produce a mismatch between market demand and
graduates’ skills.

To be sure, there is no magic wand that will overnight turn the tide or
definitively eradicate extremism. But there are a host of steps that
governments could take that go beyond desperately needed social and economic
policies that would create jobs and give youth a prospect for the future. Such
measures would start addressing root causes of extremism in a bid to persuade
those segments of society susceptible to radicalisation
that they have a stake in working within the system.

James M. Dorsey is a Senior Fellow at the S. Rajaratnam School of
International Studies (RSIS) as Nanyang Technological University in Singapore,
and co-director of the Institute of Fan Culture of the University of Würzburg,
Germany.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Sporticos

Ads

Soccer Results

The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer does not promote, link to or provide videos from any online sources who distribute illegal streaming content over the Internet with domains registered in the United States of America

Top 100 Soccer Sites

Subscribe To

Subscribe by Email

About Me

James M DorseyWelcome to The Turbulent World of Middle East Soccer by James M. Dorsey, a senior fellow at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. Soccer in the Middle East and North Africa is played as much on as off the pitch. Stadiums are a symbol of the battle for political freedom; economic opportunity; ethnic, religious and national identity; and gender rights. Alongside the mosque, the stadium was until the Arab revolt erupted in late 2010 the only alternative public space for venting pent-up anger and frustration. It was the training ground in countries like Egypt and Tunisia where militant fans prepared for a day in which their organization and street battle experience would serve them in the showdown with autocratic rulers. Soccer has its own unique thrill – a high-stakes game of cat and mouse between militants and security forces and a struggle for a trophy grander than the FIFA World Cup: the future of a region. This blog explores the role of soccer at a time of transition from autocratic rule to a more open society. It also features James’s daily political comment on the region’s developments. Contact: incoherentblog@gmail.comView my complete profile