System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
Write a step-by-step guide for resolving GitHub merge conflicts.

[Ground truth Answer]
1- Under your repository name, click Pull requests.
2- In the "Pull Requests" list, click the pull request with a merge conflict that you'd like to resolve.
3- Near the bottom of your pull request, click Resolve conflicts.
4- Decide if you want to keep only your branch's changes, keep only the other branch's changes, or make a brand new change, which may incorporate changes from both branches. Delete the conflict markers <<<<<<<, =======, >>>>>>> and make the changes you want in the final merge.
5- If you have more than one merge conflict in your file, scroll down to the next set of conflict markers and repeat steps four and five to resolve your merge conflict.
6- Once you've resolved all the conflicts in the file, click Mark as resolved.
7- If you have more than one file with a conflict, select the next file you want to edit on the left side of the page under "conflicting files" and repeat steps four through seven until you've resolved all of your pull request's merge conflicts.
8- Once you've resolved all your merge conflicts, click Commit merge. This merges the entire base branch into your head branch.
9- If prompted, review the branch that you are committing to.
If the head branch is the default branch of the repository, you can choose either to update this branch with the changes you made to resolve the conflict, or to create a new branch and use this as the head branch of the pull request.
If you choose to create a new branch, enter a name for the branch.
If the head branch of your pull request is protected you must create a new branch. You won't get the option to update the protected branch.
Click Create branch and update my pull request or I understand, continue updating BRANCH. The button text corresponds to the action you are performing.
10- To merge your pull request, click Merge pull request. For more information about other pull request merge options, see "Merging a pull request."

[Assistant's Response]
Resolving GitHub merge conflicts can be a straightforward process if approached methodically. Here’s a step-by-step guide to help you through it:

### Step 1: Understand the Conflict
Merge conflicts occur when Git cannot automatically reconcile differences between two branches. This typically happens when changes are made to the same lines in a file or when one branch deletes a file that the other branch modifies.

### Step 2: Identify Conflicted Files
Attempt to merge the branches. If conflicts arise, Git will notify you and list the files with conflicts. Use the command:
```bash
git status
```
This will show files marked as "unmerged," indicating where conflicts exist.

### Step 3: Open the Conflicted Files
Open the conflicted files in your preferred text editor. You will see conflict markers that delineate the conflicting sections:
```
<<<<<<< HEAD
Your changes here
=======
Changes from the other branch here
>>>>>>> branch-name
```

### Step 4: Resolve the Conflicts
Decide how to resolve the conflicts. You can choose to keep your changes, the changes from the other branch, or a combination of both. Edit the files to reflect your decision and ensure you remove the conflict markers (`<<<<<<<`, `=======`, `>>>>>>>`) after resolving the conflicts.

### Step 5: Mark the Conflicts as Resolved
Once all conflicts are resolved, mark the files as resolved by adding them to the staging area:
```bash
git add <file-name>
```
Do this for each file that had conflicts.

### Step 6: Complete the Merge
After staging the resolved files, complete the merge by committing the changes:
```bash
git commit -m "Resolved merge conflicts"
```

### Step 7: Push Your Changes
If you are working in a shared repository, push the changes to the remote repository to update it with your resolved merge:
```bash
git push origin <branch-name>
```

### Step 8: Verify the Merge
Finally, verify that everything is functioning correctly. Run tests or check the application to ensure that the merge has not introduced any issues.

By following these steps, you can effectively resolve merge conflicts in GitHub and maintain a smooth workflow. If you encounter any issues or need further assistance, consider consulting additional resources or asking for help from your team.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: