System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
[Instruction]
The topic of a YouTube post has been described and based on the information, you need to write a hook for starting the post. A catchy hook will keep your readers interested so they keep reading. It would be great if you could come up with as many hooks as you can.
Input: A video showing how to make a tasty cup of coffee

[Ground truth Answer]
- How do you make a great cup of coffee? We asked a professional.
- Real life stories of the greatest coffee shops in the world.
- You'll definitely want a cup of this after watching it so be sure not to miss this.
- Coffee is something most people drink every day. This video tells you everything about it.
- Watch this video on 7 habits to make you a better barista.

[Assistant's Response]
Here are some engaging hooks to start your YouTube video on making a delicious cup of coffee:

1. "Transform your morning brew into a masterpiece—let's make the perfect cup of coffee together!"
2. "Craving café-quality coffee at home? Discover the secrets to brewing the best cup!"
3. "Unlock the magic of coffee making and brew a cup that will tantalize your taste buds!"
4. "Say goodbye to bland coffee—let's craft a flavorful cup that will elevate your day!"
5. "Ready to impress with your barista skills? Dive into the art of making exceptional coffee!"
6. "Grab your favorite mug and join me in creating a coffee that's anything but ordinary!"
7. "Embark on a coffee adventure with me—learn how to brew a cup that kickstarts your day!"
8. "Curious about the ultimate coffee recipe? Let's brew something extraordinary together!"
9. "Awaken your senses with a cup of coffee that rivals your favorite café's!"
10. "Coffee lovers, rejoice! Discover how to make a cup that will make your taste buds dance!"

Feel free to adapt these hooks to match your personal style and the tone of your video!

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: