System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Readability: Is the response structured to promote readability and coherence? Does the response exhibit excellent organization?
Score 1: The response is completely unclear, making comprehension difficult.
Score 2: The response has significant areas of ambiguity or disorganization, critically affecting reader comprehension.
Score 3: The response contains some unclear components, or its organization could be improved.
Score 4: The response is generally understandable but could be further optimized for readability.
Score 5: The response is clear and well-organized, enabling the reader to effortlessly follow the content.
Completeness: Does the response provide a sufficient explanation? Comprehensiveness and thoroughness of the response should be considered, which depends on the breadth of topics covered and the level of detail provided within each topic.
Score 1: The response doesn't include any specifics or examples to support the statements made.
Score 2: The response does not provide sufficient details or supportive examples, requiring a major effort to make the response more complete.
Score 3: It is a decent response, but the breadth and depth of the response are rather limited. The details and examples used to substantiate the response may be insufficient.
Score 4: The response provides detailed explanations, but there is room for enhancement. The response could be further improved by including more details and supportive examples.
Score 5: The response fully provides comprehensive explanations. It delves deep into the topic, providing as much detail as possible, and it offers several examples to back up its points.
[Instruction]
Generate a explanation for a provided causal fact. Cause: Grande opened the drawers. Effect: He saw his old clothing. Conceptual explanation: 

[Ground truth Answer]
Drawers have clothing.

[Assistant's Response]
To explain the causal relationship between Grande opening the drawers and seeing his old clothing, we can break down the process into a clear conceptual framework.

**Causal Fact**: 
- **Cause**: Grande opened the drawers.
- **Effect**: He saw his old clothing.

**Conceptual Explanation**:

1. **Action of Opening Drawers**: The act of opening the drawers represents a deliberate action taken by Grande. Drawers are typically closed spaces designed for storage, often containing items that are not immediately visible or accessible.

2. **Accessibility of Contents**: By opening the drawers, Grande removes the physical barrier that prevents him from accessing the contents inside. This action transforms the previously hidden items into visible entities. 

3. **Visual Connection**: Once the drawers are opened, the contents—such as old clothing—are now within Grande's line of sight. The visibility of these items is contingent upon the drawers being opened; without this action, the clothing would remain concealed.

4. **Causation**: The causal relationship can be understood as follows: the act of opening the drawers is a necessary condition for Grande to see his old clothing. It is the mechanism that allows for the transition from obscurity to visibility.

5. **Conclusion**: Therefore, the act of opening the drawers directly leads to the effect of seeing the old clothing, illustrating a straightforward cause-and-effect relationship. This explanation emphasizes the importance of the action taken and the resulting change in visibility, highlighting how simple actions can lead to significant realizations or discoveries. 

In summary, Grande's action of opening the drawers is the critical step that enables him to see his old clothing, underscoring the direct link between cause and effect in this scenario.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: