You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


1. Technical Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to pressure mapping and, more particularly, to a method, apparatus and system of lifetime decay measurement pressure mapping.
2. Description of Related Art
Aerodynamic test data of surfaces, such as airfoils, are important for improving aerodynamic loading and for optimization of aerodynamic efficiency. Since, aerodynamic forces acting on an airfoil results largely from the distribution of pressure over the surface, airfoils and other aircraft components are commonly tested in wind tunnels to gather test data for use in verification of characteristics and in design improvements. It is common practice to measure surface pressures using a pressure model in a wind tunnel and compute the force distributions from the pressure data collected.
A number of techniques have been developed over the years to collect pressure measurements. A current technique is to build a pressure model having hundreds of small orifices or pressure taps machined into their surfaces. These small orifices must be drilled precisely normal to the surface with tight tolerances on location and diameter. Additionally, each pressure orifice must be connected to a pressure transducer device. The pressure taps communicate at one end with the pressure at the surface of the structure and at the other end with the pressure transducer.
Since there are usually too many orifices to leave room for the transducers inside the model, hundreds of thin tubes must be used to establish connection to the internally located transducers. Because of the spatial requirements, the number of sensors that can be used in this type of system is limited and, thus, the resolution of the measurements is also limited. Moreover, overall forces and moments cannot always be measured accurately with the above-mentioned technique, because of the poor spacial resolution. Lastly, utilizing pressure models with pressure taps is time consuming and expensive to build.
In another approach, mechanical or electrical pressure sensors can be affixed to the external surface of the pressure model to be tested. However, this approach exhibits many of the same shortcomings as the above-mentioned approach. The sensors are generally relatively large compared to the pressure model which limits the spacial resolution of data that can be gathered during the wind tunnel testing. Additionally, such sensors ordinarily extend above the surface of the model into the air stream which tends to alter the air stream and alter the measured values.
The field of pressure sensitive paint barometry has been developed in response to the difficulties arising from the above-described conventional techniques. Pressure sensitive paint barometry has developed as a result of the discovery that a surface may be coated with materials which are capable of being excited by light and which will emit light as a function of pressure which may be used as a measure of pressure on the surface. The coated material is made of an adhesive and an active agent, for example, that emits light when excited by radiation of a particular type, such as ultraviolet or visible blue light. For some types of active agents, the presence of oxygen, such as found in the air, quenches or reduces the light emission. It has been found that light output of some active agents is inversely proportional to the partial pressure of the oxygen. Therefore, the higher the pressure of oxygen in the atmosphere contacting the pressure sensitive paint, the lower the light emission of the paint.
Other pressure sensitive paints, when flashed with light, exhibit a returned or reflected light with a decay time constant which is a function of surface pressure disposed on a painted surface. However, these lifetime decay measurement systems require a plurality of exposures to capture enough light decay data to accurately compute surface pressure of a wind tunnel model.
Current methods requires that system components be manually set-up for each test image to capture exposures with different timing. Each exposure or test image requires programming a camera shutter for a specific instant of time subsequent to light exposure. Since wind tunnel test time is very expensive costing up to $10,000 per hour not including labor cost, extended manual setup time for multiple camera exposures is very expensive. The multiple programming and set-up is not only time consuming but also introduces inconsistent results. Current methods introduce as much as thirty percent error because of inadequate synchronization of a few microseconds between the camera equipment and the lighting equipment.
The present invention achieves technical advantages as an apparatus, system and method of determining surface pressure of a surface which is coated with a pressure sensitive paint which, when flashed with light, exhibits return light with a decay time constant as a function of surface pressure. The system controls a light source which is adapted to emit a train of light pulses directed at the coated surface and a camera adapted to collect light level data from the surface. Further, a synchronizer is used to provide timing and control of the light source and the camera in which the synchronizer enables the light source and subsequently enables the camera to collect light level data in a first gate period and a second gate period. The first gate period is set to a predetermined time period following a light pulse and the second gate period is set to a predetermined time period subsequent to the first gate period. A decay time constant is determined from the data collected in the first gate period and the second gate period.
Although the new advantages of the present invention are too numerous to discuss fully here, several advantages are of particular interest. First, the present invention synchronizes the electronic shutter of a digital camera to provide defined exposures with consistent flash numbers providing for the determination of more precise decay time constants. Second, the present invention also provides for higher productivity eliminating the need for operator set-up programming for each camera exposure, thus, allowing an operator to collect up to 10-20 times as many exposures as current methods, given the same amount of time. Additionally, the present invention offers an operator a high level of confidence that the equipment is operating properly by observing a proper sequence of events.