You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Q:

How to get all methods of a python class with given decorator

How to get all methods of a given class A that are decorated with the @decorator2?
class A():
    def method_a(self):
      pass

    @decorator1
    def method_b(self, b):
      pass

    @decorator2
    def method_c(self, t=5):
      pass

A:

Method 1: Basic registering decorator
I already answered this question here: Calling functions by array index in Python =)

Method 2: Sourcecode parsing
If you do not have control over the class definition, which is one interpretation of what you'd like to suppose, this is impossible (without code-reading-reflection), since for example the decorator could be a no-op decorator (like in my linked example) that merely returns the function unmodified. (Nevertheless if you allow yourself to wrap/redefine the decorators, see Method 3: Converting decorators to be "self-aware", then you will find an elegant solution)
It is a terrible terrible hack, but you could use the inspect module to read the sourcecode itself, and parse it. This will not work in an interactive interpreter, because the inspect module will refuse to give sourcecode in interactive mode. However, below is a proof of concept.
#!/usr/bin/python3

import inspect

def deco(func):
    return func

def deco2():
    def wrapper(func):
        pass
    return wrapper

class Test(object):
    @deco
    def method(self):
        pass

    @deco2()
    def method2(self):
        pass

def methodsWithDecorator(cls, decoratorName):
    sourcelines = inspect.getsourcelines(cls)[0]
    for i,line in enumerate(sourcelines):
        line = line.strip()
        if line.split('(')[0].strip() == '@'+decoratorName: # leaving a bit out
            nextLine = sourcelines[i+1]
            name = nextLine.split('def')[1].split('(')[0].strip()
            yield(name)

It works!:
>>> print(list(  methodsWithDecorator(Test, 'deco')  ))
['method']

Note that one has to pay attention to parsing and the python syntax, e.g. @deco and @deco(... are valid results, but @deco2 should not be returned if we merely ask for 'deco'. We notice that according to the official python syntax at http://docs.python.org/reference/compound_stmts.html decorators are as follows:
decorator      ::=  "@" dotted_name ["(" [argument_list [","]] ")"] NEWLINE

We breathe a sigh of relief at not having to deal with cases like @(deco). But note that this still doesn't really help you if you have really really complicated decorators, such as @getDecorator(...), e.g.
def getDecorator():
    return deco

Thus, this best-that-you-can-do strategy of parsing code cannot detect cases like this. Though if you are using this method, what you're really after is what is written on top of the method in the definition, which in this case is getDecorator.
According to the spec, it is also valid to have @foo1.bar2.baz3(...) as a decorator. You can extend this method to work with that. You might also be able to extend this method to return a <function object ...> rather than the function's name, with lots of effort. This method however is hackish and terrible.

Method 3: Converting decorators to be "self-aware"
If you do not have control over the decorator definition (which is another interpretation of what you'd like), then all these issues go away because you have control over how the decorator is applied. Thus, you can modify the decorator by wrapping it, to create your own decorator, and use that to decorate your functions. Let me say that yet again: you can make a decorator that decorates the decorator you have no control over, "enlightening" it, which in our case makes it do what it was doing before but also append a .decorator metadata property to the callable it returns, allowing you to keep track of "was this function decorated or not? let's check function.decorator!". And then you can iterate over the methods of the class, and just check to see if the decorator has the appropriate .decorator property! =) As demonstrated here:
def makeRegisteringDecorator(foreignDecorator):
    """
        Returns a copy of foreignDecorator, which is identical in every
        way(*), except also appends a .decorator property to the callable it
        spits out.
    """
    def newDecorator(func):
        # Call to newDecorator(method)
        # Exactly like old decorator, but output keeps track of what decorated it
        R = foreignDecorator(func) # apply foreignDecorator, like call to foreignDecorator(method) would have done
        R.decorator = newDecorator # keep track of decorator
        #R.original = func         # might as well keep track of everything!
        return R

    newDecorator.__name__ = foreignDecorator.__name__
    newDecorator.__doc__ = foreignDecorator.__doc__
    # (*)We can be somewhat "hygienic", but newDecorator still isn't signature-preserving, i.e. you will not be able to get a runtime list of parameters. For that, you need hackish libraries...but in this case, the only argument is func, so it's not a big issue

    return newDecorator

Demonstration for @decorator:
deco = makeRegisteringDecorator(deco)

class Test2(object):
    @deco
    def method(self):
        pass

    @deco2()
    def method2(self):
        pass

def methodsWithDecorator(cls, decorator):
    """ 
        Returns all methods in CLS with DECORATOR as the
        outermost decorator.

        DECORATOR must be a "registering decorator"; one
        can make any decorator "registering" via the
        makeRegisteringDecorator function.
    """
    for maybeDecorated in cls.__dict__.values():
        if hasattr(maybeDecorated, 'decorator'):
            if maybeDecorated.decorator == decorator:
                print(maybeDecorated)
                yield maybeDecorated

It works!:
>>> print(list(   methodsWithDecorator(Test2, deco)   ))
[<function method at 0x7d62f8>]

However, a "registered decorator" must be the outermost decorator, otherwise the .decorator attribute annotation will be lost. For example in a train of
@decoOutermost
@deco
@decoInnermost
def func(): ...

you can only see metadata that decoOutermost exposes, unless we keep references to "more-inner" wrappers.
sidenote: the above method can also build up a .decorator that keeps track of the entire stack of applied decorators and input functions and decorator-factory arguments. =) For example if you consider the commented-out line R.original = func, it is feasible to use a method like this to keep track of all wrapper layers. This is personally what I'd do if I wrote a decorator library, because it allows for deep introspection.
There is also a difference between @foo and @bar(...). While they are both "decorator expressons" as defined in the spec, note that foo is a decorator, while bar(...) returns a dynamically-created decorator, which is then applied. Thus you'd need a separate function makeRegisteringDecoratorFactory, that is somewhat like makeRegisteringDecorator but even MORE META:
def makeRegisteringDecoratorFactory(foreignDecoratorFactory):
    def newDecoratorFactory(*args, **kw):
        oldGeneratedDecorator = foreignDecoratorFactory(*args, **kw)
        def newGeneratedDecorator(func):
            modifiedFunc = oldGeneratedDecorator(func)
            modifiedFunc.decorator = newDecoratorFactory # keep track of decorator
            return modifiedFunc
        return newGeneratedDecorator
    newDecoratorFactory.__name__ = foreignDecoratorFactory.__name__
    newDecoratorFactory.__doc__ = foreignDecoratorFactory.__doc__
    return newDecoratorFactory

Demonstration for @decorator(...):
def deco2():
    def simpleDeco(func):
        return func
    return simpleDeco

deco2 = makeRegisteringDecoratorFactory(deco2)

print(deco2.__name__)
# RESULT: 'deco2'

@deco2()
def f():
    pass

This generator-factory wrapper also works:
>>> print(f.decorator)
<function deco2 at 0x6a6408>

bonus Let's even try the following with Method #3:
def getDecorator(): # let's do some dispatching!
    return deco

class Test3(object):
    @getDecorator()
    def method(self):
        pass

    @deco2()
    def method2(self):
        pass

Result:
>>> print(list(   methodsWithDecorator(Test3, deco)   ))
[<function method at 0x7d62f8>]

As you can see, unlike method2, @deco is correctly recognized even though it was never explicitly written in the class. Unlike method2, this will also work if the method is added at runtime (manually, via a metaclass, etc.) or inherited.
Be aware that you can also decorate a class, so if you "enlighten" a decorator that is used to both decorate methods and classes, and then write a class within the body of the class you want to analyze, then methodsWithDecorator will return decorated classes as well as decorated methods. One could consider this a feature, but you can easily write logic to ignore those by examining the argument to the decorator, i.e. .original, to achieve the desired semantics.

A:

To expand upon @ninjagecko's excellent answer in Method 2: Source code parsing, you can use the ast module introduced in Python 2.6 to perform self-inspection as long as the inspect module has access to the source code.
def findDecorators(target):
    import ast, inspect
    res = {}
    def visit_FunctionDef(node):
        res[node.name] = [ast.dump(e) for e in node.decorator_list]

    V = ast.NodeVisitor()
    V.visit_FunctionDef = visit_FunctionDef
    V.visit(compile(inspect.getsource(target), '?', 'exec', ast.PyCF_ONLY_AST))
    return res

I added a slightly more complicated decorated method:
@x.y.decorator2
def method_d(self, t=5): pass

Results:
> findDecorators(A)
{'method_a': [],
 'method_b': ["Name(id='decorator1', ctx=Load())"],
 'method_c': ["Name(id='decorator2', ctx=Load())"],
 'method_d': ["Attribute(value=Attribute(value=Name(id='x', ctx=Load()), attr='y', ctx=Load()), attr='decorator2', ctx=Load())"]}