System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Insightfulness: Is the response creative, original or novel, including new perspectives or interpretations of existing information?
Score 1: The response is overly simplistic, lacking any originality or novelty.
Score 2: The ideas or perspectives within the response are commonplace, demonstrating a lack of originality or novelty.
Score 3: Some may perceive the response as original and novel, but others may find it ordinary or uninspiring.
Score 4: The response includes some innovative perspectives or ideas that require thoughtful consideration, yet they aren't particularly surprising.
Score 5: The response is infused with surprisingly creative perspectives or ideas that are challenging to conceive, showcasing significant originality and novelty.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Expand the given sentence and give it more details and depth.
Input: It changed my life.

[Ground truth Answer]
The experience changed the course of my life forever.

[Assistant's Response]
The moment I realized that it changed my life was both profound and transformative. It was as if a light had been switched on in a dimly lit room, illuminating everything around me. Before that pivotal experience, I had been navigating through life in a haze, caught in a routine that felt monotonous and uninspiring. I often found myself questioning my purpose, feeling as though I was merely existing rather than truly living.

But then, something shifted. Whether it was a chance encounter, a powerful book, or an inspiring talk, I felt a surge of motivation that I had never experienced before. Each word or idea resonated with me on a deep level, awakening a sense of passion and curiosity that had long been dormant. I began to reflect on my dreams and aspirations, realizing that I had been holding myself back out of fear or complacency.

This newfound clarity propelled me to take action. I started setting goals that aligned with my true interests and values, pushing myself out of my comfort zone. I sought out new experiences, whether it was traveling to places I had always wanted to visit, learning new skills, or connecting with people who inspired me. Each step I took was a testament to my commitment to living a more authentic and fulfilling life.

Looking back, I can see how that moment served as a catalyst for my personal growth. It taught me the importance of resilience, the power of community, and the beauty of pursuing one's passions. I am now on a journey of continuous self-discovery, embracing challenges and celebrating victories, big and small. That single moment truly changed my life, setting me on a path filled with purpose, joy, and endless possibilities.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: