You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


Background {#Sec1}
==========

Lithium-sulfur batteries with high energy density (\~ 2600 Wh kg^− 1^) and high theoretical specific capacity (1672 mAh g^− 1^) are taken into consideration for large-scale energy applications. In fact, the application of lighter Li-S cell with long-cycle life and fast charge discharge-regime is expected to be commercialized in moderate to high-volume market \[[@CR1]\]. Due to high abundance and non-toxic nature of sulfur, Li-S battery system satisfies both cost-effective and environmental considerations. Despite the aforementioned advantages, there are several limitations with Li-S technology which cause a gap between the theoretical and practical energy density of Li-S battery. The major problems are related to very complex reaction mechanisms of lithium and sulfur. The reaction of S~8~ with Li^+^ during the discharge process leads to the formation of soluble polysulfides in the electrolyte and their diffusion toward the anode. Diffusion of these active spices with insulating nature causes the shuttle effect, which is known as the most serious problem about capacity degradation in the Li-S cells. Diffusion of soluble polysulfides toward the anode corrodes the lithium anode, suppresses ion mobility, and gives rise to the loss of active material \[[@CR2], [@CR3]\].

Nanocomposite has become the most attractive cathode material due to its efficiency, low cost, stability, and high electrical conductivity \[[@CR4], [@CR5]\]. Also, they can serve as electron collector and transporter resulting in the increase of ion and electron mobility \[[@CR6]\].

Sulfur-carbon nanocomposites with micro-/meso-porous structural design were investigated recently to encapsulate sulfur into porous substrates \[[@CR7]--[@CR10]\]. Nanocomposite carbon host cathode with high electrical conductivity contributes to enhance redox reaction and improves sulfur and other polysulfides products adsorption on the surface of carbon host. CNFs, CNTs, and graphene are known as the most popular carbon host materials \[[@CR11]--[@CR14]\].

Among carbonous host materials, graphene-based hosts with reasonable electrical conductivity and admiring flexibility and mechanical strength have been investigated due to their enhancement capability of electrochemical reactivity of sulfur and overall cycle life.

Several studies have been investigated on the chemical interactions between the functional group (e.g., oxygen group or hydroxyl group) on graphene and polysulfides to enhance the polysulfides immobilization \[[@CR15], [@CR16]\]. In the study of Wang et al., nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets/sulfur (NGNSs/S) composite were investigated as a conductive host to entrap S/polysulfides in the cathode part. The NGNSs/S composite delivered an initial discharge capacity of 856.7 mAh g^− 1^ and a reversible capacity of 319.3 mAh g^− 1^ at 0.1 C \[[@CR17]\].

Polymer/graphene hybrid porous electrodes have also been investigated recently as promising electrode materials for lightweight and flexible energy storage devices with stable high performance \[[@CR18], [@CR19]\].

Polyaniline (PANI)-modified cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)--graphene oxide (GO)--sulfur nanocomposites exhibited significant enhancement in the performance of lithium-sulfur batteries. CTAB-coated sulfur layer is believed to be able to trap polysulfides and alleviate dissolution of polysulfides through the formation of Li~2~S~x~ ... N. The cell showed the capacity of 970 mAh g^−1^ at 0.2 C and retained it at 715 mAh g^− 1^ after 300 cycles, also initial capacity was 820 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C with a capacity retention of 670 mAh g^−1^ after 500 cycles \[[@CR20]\].

The quinone polymers such as poly 1, 5-diamino-anthraquinone (PDAAQ) are another promising additives for graphene hybrid cathodes and separators. They involve two-electron redox reactions. Combination of quinone polymers with excellent conductive carbon materials, such as porous carbon materials, graphene, and CNTs, improve the electronic conductivity of the quinone materials and enhance rate capabilities and cycling performances. Additionally, conductive carbon promotes the utilization of the quinone-active materials during charge/discharge process \[[@CR21]\]. This novel structure also increases the active specific surface area by creating additional active sites \[[@CR22]\].

Recently, application of PDAAQ-potassium functionalized graphene nanoplates (K-FGF) in the separator of Li-S battery was introduced by Kizil et al. to enhance the electrochemical performance of Li-S battery. They reported PDAAQ-K-FGF (cathode and anode-facing side) coated separator delivered reversible capacities of 1001 and 776 mAh g^− 1^ at 0.5 C and 1 C with Coulombic efficiency as high as 99%. They found K-FGF with high hydrophilicity could increase the electrochemical performance by decreasing the internal resistance \[[@CR23]\].

Metal oxides in graphene/S hybrid cathode are used as promising additives to the sulfur cathode. Mostly used additives of metal oxides are listed as manganese oxide, nickel oxide, alumina, silica, and titania \[[@CR24]--[@CR28]\].

Hue et al. reported new mesoporous TiO~2~/reduced graphene oxide (rGO) as an efficient polysulfide trapping in the cathode. TiO~2~\@rGO hybrid structure has been shown to trap polysulfide products effectively by means of strong chemical bonding with oxygen double bonds. Also, incorporating GO in the cathode enhanced the electrical conductivity and improved polysulfides trapping ability providing large surface area. They found that incorporation of TiO~2~\@rGO in the cathode exhibits capacities of 1116 and 831 mAh g^−1^ at the current densities of 0.2 C and 1 C (1 C = 1675 mA g^− 1^) after 100 and 200 cycles \[[@CR29]\].

Herein, we have investigated the influence of different dopants incorporated into the sulfur-polycarboxylate functionalized graphene (PC-FGF) cathode. In the first test, TiO~2~ nanoparticles are added into PC-FGF/S cathodes to enhance active material reutilization. Also, TiO~2~ can effectively trap soluble polysulfides both at the cathode and the separator \[[@CR30], [@CR31]\] and increase the specific capacity of the lithium-sulfur battery. In the second experiment, PDAAQ is added into PC-FGF/S cathodes to improve chemical binding between the polysulfides and quinone group of PDAAQ and enhance redox reactions. The cells with these cathodes and three different coatings of PDAAQ/PC-FGF, PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF, and PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT on the cathode-facing side of the glass separators were tested. Conversion and physical confinement of polysulfides at the cathode-separator interface, and the electrochemical performances of the cells were compared and discussed.

Methods {#Sec2}
=======

Materials and Chemicals {#Sec3}
-----------------------

Polycarboxylate functionalized graphene (PC-FGF, Sigma-Aldrich), cetyltrimethyl- ammonium bromide (CTAB, BioXtra, ≥99% Sigma-Aldrich), 1, 5-poly diaminoanthraquinone (PDAAQ, technical grade, 85%, Sigma-Aldrich), titanium dioxide (TiO~2~, nanopowder rutile, 21 nm particle size, ≥ 99.5% trace metals basis, Sigma-Aldrich), multi wall carbon nanotube (MWCNT \> 98% carbon basis, Sigma-Aldrich), sulfur (S, 99.5--100.5%, Sigma-Aldrich), bis (trifluoromethane) sulfonamide lithium (LiTFSI, 99.95% trace metals basis, Sigma-Aldrich), lithium nitrite (99.99% trace metals basis, Sigma-Aldrich), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, Mw 1000--1200 kg/mol, Solef® 5130, Solvay), N-methyl-2 pyrrolidone (NMP, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich), 1,3-dioxolane (DOL, 99%, Sigma-Aldrich), and 1,2-dimethoxyethane (DME, 99.5%, Sigma-Aldrich) were used without any purification. Glass microfiber filters (Whatman, Grade GF/C) with 1.0 μm retention and circle size of 2.5 cm with the thickness of 260 μm were used as basis for coating.

Separator Coating {#Sec4}
-----------------

For PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF coating, a mixture of PDAAQ, CTAB, and PC-FGF (with a mass ratio of 2:2:1) was placed in an agate mortar and allowed to ground for 15 min to obtain the PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF composite. Then, PVDF powder was added to this composite (with a mass ratio of 1:4) and ground until homogenous slurry was obtained. Subsequently, NMP solution (with a mass ratio of 1:9, contains 30% wt. PVDF) was added to the PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF/PVDF mixture and allowed to stir for 30 min more to form a homogeneous slurry. The slurry was then coated on one side of a glass fiber separator and dried in an air oven at 60 °C for 2 h. PDAAQ/PC-FGF coating was prepared as described above. The only difference was related to PDAAQ/PC-FGF composite mass ratio which was defined as 1:1. For PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT coating, a mixture of TiO~2~, MWCNT, and PC-FGF (with a mass ratio of 2:2:1) was placed in an agate mortar and the same process was followed to obtain PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT-coated glass fiber separator. The thickness of uncoated glass fiber separator was 260 μm and the measured coating thickness of PDAAQ/PC-FGF, PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB, and PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT were 53, 57, and 61 μm respectively.

Cathode Preparation {#Sec5}
-------------------

To fabricate TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode, the slurry with 60 wt% S, 15 wt% PC-FGF, 15 wt.% TiO~2~ nanopowder and 10 wt.% PVDF in NMP was coated onto an aluminum foil using doctor blade method. PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode was prepared with 60 wt% S, 15 wt% PC-FGF, 15 wt.% PDAAQ, and 10 wt.% PVDF binder in NMP solvent and coated onto an aluminum foil using doctor blade method. (16 μm thickness, 1.32 cm^2^ in area). The coated cathode was dried in an air oven at 60 °C for 4 h. 1 M LiTFSI and 0.5 M LiNO~3~ in a solvent mixture of DME/DOL (1:1) was considered as an efficient electrolyte for polysulfides trapping. Amount of electrolyte in different coin cells was fixed at 20 μl/mg of S. The S loading set around 1.8--2.4 mg cm^−2^. The maximum S loading was 2.4 mg cm^−2^.

Electrochemical Performance Characterization {#Sec6}
--------------------------------------------

The CR2032-type coin cells were assembled with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S or PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S composite cathode, cathode-facing side coated separator, lithium metal anode, and electrolyte in an argon-filled glove box. The cells were cycled between 1.5 and 3 V on a Neware BTS 3008 battery tester at room temperature. Based on the sulfur mass in the cathode, specific capacities were determined. Surface characterization of modified cathodes and separators were carried out using SEM equipped with an EDS.

The cyclic voltammetry (CV) measurements were performed by Gamry Reference 600 with a scan rate of 0.2 mV s^−1^ in a potential range of 3--1.4 V (vs. Li^+^/Li). Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) tests were performed by using Gamry Reference 600 to measure the internal resistance of the objected cells from 1 MHz to 1 Hz at an AC voltage amplitude of 10 mV.

Results and Discussion {#Sec7}
======================

Schematics of Li-S cells with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S or PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode with PDAAQ/PC-FGF-coated glass fiber separator illustrate the behavior of polysulfide migration as shown in Fig. [1](#Fig1){ref-type="fig"}a, b.Fig. 1**a** Schematic diagram for the lithium ion insertion/deinsertion in the benzoquinone structures of PDAAQ. **b** Schematics of different polysulfide migration attitudes with two different cathodes

As shown in Fig. [1](#Fig1){ref-type="fig"}a, during the charging process, one of carbonyl groups in PDAAQ accepts one electron and forms a free radical anion, and electrostatically adsorbs Li-ions. The redox mechanism of the PDAAQ is based on electron transfer reaction \[[@CR21], [@CR32]\].

As shown in Fig. [1](#Fig1){ref-type="fig"}b, PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator prevents the polysulfide diffusion into the anode side during charging and increases the deposition of polysulfides on the separator surface. PDAAQ with benzoquinone segments acts as a second current collector to confine intermediate polysulfides products into the cathode and enhances active material reutilization within the cathode compartment. PDAAQ with redox-active benzoquinone segments to PC-FGF separator proposed a novel separator with Li host capability through insertion and extraction of Li-ions in benzoquinone segments \[[@CR33], [@CR34]\]. As a cathode compartment, there is strong chemical adsorption between TiO~2~ nanoparticles at PC-FGF/S cathode and polysulfides. This novel cathode could suppress the dissolution of PS and prevent the shuttle effect by physical adsorption and chemical confinement \[[@CR35]\].

The SEM images of TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathodes are shown in Fig. [2](#Fig2){ref-type="fig"}a, b. Figure [2](#Fig2){ref-type="fig"}a shows that TiO~2~ particles are uniformly distributed into a continuous network of PC-FGF/S cathode. As shown in Fig. [2](#Fig2){ref-type="fig"}b, homogeneously dispersion of PDAAQ on the PC-FGF/S cathode provide sufficient sites to host active materials. Figure [2](#Fig2){ref-type="fig"}d--f represents the SEM image of TiO~2~/MWCNT/PC-FGF, PDAAQ/PC-FGF, and PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF-coated glass fiber separators respectively. Uniform dispersion of TiO~2~ effectively confines the polysulfides within the separator and improves reutilization of intercepted active materials (Fig. [2](#Fig2){ref-type="fig"}d). Dispersion of PDAAQ on the PC-FGF-coated separator is similar to the dispersion of PDAAQ on the PC-FGF/S cathode and enhances porous sites to trap polysulfides (Fig. [2](#Fig2){ref-type="fig"}e).Fig. 2SEM images of **a** TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode and **b** PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode, the insets are high-resolution images. **c** Photographs of TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S (left) and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S (right) cathode, SEM images of **d** TiO~2~/MWCNT/PC-FGF **e** PDAAQ/PC-FGF, **f** PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF coated glass fiber separators, the insets are the high-resolution images

Figure [3](#Fig3){ref-type="fig"}a shows the cycling performance of Li-S cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode and three different coatings on the glass fiber separators. (1 C = 1672 mA g^−1^). It demonstrates that the cell with PDAAQ/PC-FGF coated separator exhibited the highest initial capacity of 1230 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C among others, and capacity retained at 900 mAh g^−1^ after 100 cycles. PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separator showed initial capacity of 1040 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C with a capacity retention of 730 mAh g^−1^ after 100 cycles. It seems that when PDAAQ was applied both in the cathode and the separator, initial capacities were high with satisfactory discharge capacities between 1st and 100th cycles which were arising from quinone groups of PDAAQ with π-electrons which can undergo both interchain and intrachain movement in three dimensions \[[@CR32]\].Fig. 3**a** Cycling performance of Li-S cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode and three different coated separators at current density of 0.5 C. **b** Galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles for the 1st, 5th, 100th cycles of Li-S cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF, **c** PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB, **d** PC-FGF/TiO~2~-MWCNT interlayers at 0.5 C with potential window of 1.5--3 V versus Li^+^/Li^0^

As shown in Fig. [3](#Fig3){ref-type="fig"}a, the highest stability belongs to PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode when integrated with PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT-coated separator with initial discharge capacity of 800 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C and superior capacity retention of 700 mAh g^−1^ after 100 cycles.

This change in the trend of discharge capacity is related to the effective role of PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT-coated separator with high-ion selectivity especially in long-life cycling to trap undesired polysulfides species which release from PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S toward the anode and limit diffusion of polysulfides to anode side \[[@CR35], [@CR36]\]. As shown in Fig. [3](#Fig3){ref-type="fig"}b--d, polarization potential for PDAAQ/PC-FGF, PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF, and PC-GF/TiO~2~/MWCNT are 238, 114, and 327 mV respectively. By incorporation of PDAAQ into PC-FGF and CTAB/PC-FGF coatings, the cells showed higher discharge capacity after 100 cycles and lower polarization potential indicating smaller reaction barrier due to high redox potential and polysulfide adsorption capability of PDAAQ.

Figure [4](#Fig4){ref-type="fig"}a shows the cycling performance of the cells with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode and the same three separators. The cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separators showed very similar performance with the initial capacities of 1241 and 1232 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C, respectively, and retained the capacities at 1100 and 1096 mAh g^−1^ after100 cycles respectively. PDAAQ containing separators exhibited better capacity retention performance after 100 cycles when using TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode, compared to PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode. The cell with PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT separator and TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode showed the initial capacity of 1011 mAh g^−1^ and capacity retention of capacity of 697 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C after 100 cycles. In Fig. [4](#Fig4){ref-type="fig"}b--d, charge/discharge voltage profiles for the cells with three different separators are shown. PDAAQ/PC-FGF and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separator exhibited low polarization potential of 261 and 134 mV and capacity retention of 1100 and 1096 mAh g^−1^ respectively. Due to electrostatic interaction between Br^−^ ions in CTAB and negatively charged polysulfides species, polarization potential reduced to 134 Mv indicating smaller reaction barrier and higher active material reutilization. For PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT-coated separator, low polarization potential was reported at the first cycle (131 mV). After 50 cycles, polarization potential increased to 234 mV due to the formation of undesirable polysulfides species which restricted active material reutilization and blocked lithium-ion diffusion (Fig. [4](#Fig4){ref-type="fig"}d).Fig. 4**a** Cycling performance of Li-S cells with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode and three different coated separators at current density of 0.5 C. **b** Galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles for the 1st, 5th, 100th cycles of Li-S cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF, **c** PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB, **d** PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT interlayers at 0.5 C with potential window of 1.5--3 V versus Li^+^/Li^0^

Cycling performances and coulombic efficiencies of the cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator and the two different cathodes were tested and results are shown in Fig. [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}a. Coulombic efficiencies are about 100% for the cells with each of the cathodes and PDAAQ/PC-FGF-coated separator. The cell with TiO2/PC-FGF/S cathode retained a capacity of 1381 mAh g^−1^ after 100 cycles at 0.2 C, while the cell with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode showed the specific capacity of 1243 mAh g^− 1^ after 100 cycles at 0.2 C. TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode could trap negatively charged polysulfides with strong chemical adsorption. Unabsorbed polysulfides during charge process are trapped by PDAAQ/PC-FGF-coated separator through strong binding energy between positively charged NH~2~ in PDAAQ and negatively charged polysulfides. Also, oxygen-containing groups in PDAAQ act as Li-ion hopping site. Besides benefitting from PDAAQ, PC-FGF with a polycarboxylate functionalized electron-donating group increases redox activity in PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator with capacity retention of 85.7% after 100 cycles. PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode functioned as a redox-active cathode which allowed polysulfides to undergo several oxidation and reduction reactions at the cathode. PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode with PC-FGF separator showed capacity retention of 86.4% after 100 cycles. In Fig. [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}b, c, rate capability of PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S and TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathodes are shown. PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode with three different interlayers were tested at 0.2 C, 0.5 C, 1 C, and back to 0.5 C (Fig. [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}b). The cell with PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator showed higher initial capacity of 1370 mAh g^−1^ and the capacity declined to 1263, 1036, and then back to 1091 mAh g^− 1^ respectively. The cell with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB delivered specific capacities of 1290, 1053, and 947 mAh g^−1^ at 0.2 C, 0.5 C, and 1 C. The capacity retained without significant change at 941 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C with retention rate of 72%. For PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT, separator fast decay of capacity were observed specially during early cycles. It showed an initial capacity of 1190 mAh g^−1^ at 0.2 C but the capacity declined gradually to 805 and 671 mAh g^−1^ at current densities of 0.5 and 1 C, and then at 701 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C (Fig. [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}b).Fig. 5**a** Cycling performances and Coulombic efficiencies of Li-S cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator and two different cathodes at 0.2 C. **b** Rate performance of Li-S cells with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode and three different separators. **c** Rate performance of Li-S cells with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode and three different separators

Figure [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}c shows the rate capability tests for TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode with PDAAQ/PC-FGF, PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB, and TiO~2~/MWCNT/PC-FGF separators at 0.2 C, 0.5 C, and 1 C. The cell with PDAAQ-PC-FGF demonstrated an initial capacity of 1367 mAh g^−1^ and the capacity retained at 1358 and 1298 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C and 1 C, and then at 1348 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C with a retention rate of 98% after 100 cycles, showing superior stability and very low decay rate. It was found that the electrochemical performance of the cell with PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF separator was similar to that of PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator especially in early cycles. PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF separator delivered initial capacity of 1351 mAh g^−1^ at 0.2 C and the capacity retained at 1273 and 1205 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C and 1 C, and then at 1224 mAh g^−1^ at 0.5 C with a retention rate of 90% (Fig. [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}c). By adding CTAB to separator coating more polysulfides are pushed toward the cathode, and as the number of cycles increased the more polysulfides are accumulated on the cathode surface, subsequently the less polysulfides could be reutilized by TiO~2~ nanoparticles containing cathode. This result proves that CTAB addition to coating has adverse effect as the number of cycles increase. TiO~2~/MWCNT/PC-FGF separator exhibited unstable and fast declining for specific capacity at various current densities. At 0.2 C, 0.5 C, and 1 C capacity retained at 1048, 881, and 691 mAh g^−1^ respectively and when current density returned back to 0.5 C, specific capacity of 738 mAh g^−1^ can be obtained. Capacity retention was just delivered 70% (Fig. [5](#Fig5){ref-type="fig"}c).

Figure [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}a shows the cyclic voltammetry (CV) in the voltage range of 1.4--3 V (vs. Li/Li+) at a scanning rate of 0.2 mV s^−1^ for PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S and TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode when glass fiber separator was coated with PDAAQ-PC-FGF. In the voltage range of 1.4--3 V, TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode reveal 2.20, 1.80, and 2.19, 1.83 V cathodic peaks respectively which display the formation of long-chain lithium polysulfide (Li~2~S~n~) and further reduction to Li~2~S~2~ or Li~2~S. One anodic peak at 2.30 and 2.36 V for TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode reveals oxidation of Li~2~S~2~ or Li~2~S to long-chain lithium polysulfide. CV of PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S and TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB separator was investigated in Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}b. Two cathodic peaks are located at 2.28 and 2.0 V for TiO~2~-PC-FGF-S cathode and 2.33 and 2.02 V for PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode implying larger electrochemical polarization in comparison with PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator as shown in Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}a. As indicated in Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}a, TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S in PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator display smaller voltage polarization with more positive anodic peak and more negative cathodic peaks contribute to accelerate redox kinetic reactions between polysulfide intermediate products and TiO~2~ nanoparticles in the cathode. The same improvement in electrochemical polarization has been observed for CTAB-based separator when the cell is assembled with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode (Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}b).Fig. 6CV curves of Li-S cells at scan rate of 0.2 mV S^−1^ **a** with PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator, **b** with PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB separator, **c** electrochemical impedance spectrum (EIS) curves of PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator with two different cathodes 1st and 100th cycles at 0.5 C, **d** EIS curves of PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB separator with two different cathodes 1st and 100th cycles at 0.5 C

As indicated in Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}a, b, peak І displays conversion reactions from elemental sulfur to long-chain polysulfides. Peak ІІ identifies the conversion of soluble polysulfides to short-chain Li~2~S~2~/Li~2~S polysulfides. Converting short-chain back to long-chain polysulfides and further to sulfur is shown by peak ІІІ.

The Nyquist plots for two different cathodes before and after 100 cycles are shown in Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}c, d. The semicircle at high frequencies represents the resistance of the surface films and at medium frequencies displays the charge transfer resistance at the electrode−electrolyte interface. TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode with PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator displays smaller charge transfer resistance before and after 100 cycles in compare to PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode with the same separator. The reason behind that is referred to high porosity of TiO~2~ nanoparticles, electrolyte could permeate faster, suggesting faster ion diffusion and better interfacial property (Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}c). Figure [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}d exhibits TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode with PDAAQ/CTAB/PC-FGF-coated separator before and after 100 cycles. For TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode displays smaller interfacial resistance than those of PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode and better electrical conduction for charge transfer \[[@CR37]\].

In PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode bigger diameter of the semicircle in the Nyquist plot reflects the accumulation of polysulfides which limit electrolyte infiltration and decrease electrochemical performance of the cell. As shown in Fig. [6](#Fig6){ref-type="fig"}c, d, the resistance of all the cells after cycling were more compared with before cycling resistance. Just for PDAAQ/PC-FGF/S cathode with PC-FGF/PDAAQ/CTAB separator, the value of charge transfer resistance after cycling decreases. In this case, electrolyte infiltration improved after 100 cycles led to fast charge transport and fewer degree of polysulfide diffusion \[[@CR38], [@CR39]\].

The above-mentioned results proved that the cell with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode and PDAAQ/PC-FGF, PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separators showed the best cycling performance and the lowest interfacial resistance among the others. To confirm the efficiency of our suggested cathode and separator design to hinder polysulfide diffusion, the Li-S cells were disassembled after 100 cycles at 0.5 C, and additional inspection into the lithium polysulfide deposition on the separator surfaces (cathode-facing side) is performed by SEM images and related sulfur mappings.

Figure [7](#Fig7){ref-type="fig"}a--c displays SEM images of the separator surfaces after 100 cycling with three different coatings. As shown in Fig. [7](#Fig7){ref-type="fig"}a, b, polysulfides were deposited around PDAAQ at PDAAQ/PC-FGF and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB coated separators when integrated with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode which means that it could restrain the polysulfide migration toward the anode and improve cell performance. Also, results are in good agreement with the sulfur-mapping analysis by EDS. As shown in Fig. [7](#Fig7){ref-type="fig"}d, e, sulfur distribute homogeneously in the PDAAQ/PC-FGF and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separators, which proved superior adsorption and permeation ability of coated glass fibers. The stronger sulfur signals in the PDAAQ/PC-FGF and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separators implies high capability of PDAAQ-based separators to trap polysulfides when integrated with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode.Fig. 7SEM images of the surface view of **a** PDAAQ/PC-FCF **b** PDAAQ/PC-FCF/CTAB **c** PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT coated separators cycled for 100 cycles at 0.5 C with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode, EDS mapping of sulfur element on the separator surface cycled **d** with PDAAQ/PC-FCF **e** PDAAQ/PC-FCF/CTAB, and **f** PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT-coated separators with TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode; the insets are the related elemental spectra

EDS mapping showed high and homogenous distribution of sulfur when PDAAQ/PC-FGF-coated separator was introduced and functioned as an efficient interlayer to suppress movement of Li~2~S~2~ and Li~2~S polysulfides toward the anode. It could alleviate shuttle effect through its superior ability to adsorb short-chain polysulfides and enhance active material reutilization. PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separator showed similar behavior with weaker sulfur intensity in the cathode-facing side of the separator. PC-FGF/TiO~2~/MWCNT-coated separator displayed the lowest sulfur intensity and sulfur adsorption on the separator surface among others (Fig. [7](#Fig7){ref-type="fig"}f), verifying less polysulfides could be trapped by the separator leading to loss of active material and high capacity fading rate.

Conclusions {#Sec8}
===========

TiO~2~/PC-FGF and PDAAQ/PC-FGF incorporated S cathodes were prepared through one step slurry method, and the cells with these cathodes and three different coated separators were tested and their electrochemical performances were compared. PDAAQ/PC-FGF and PDAAQ/PC-FGF/CTAB-coated separators show superior capacity retention and high cyclability for both cathodes offering high material reutilization. The most promising result belongs to TiO~2~/PC-FGF/S cathode with PDAAQ/PC-FGF separator which minimizes diffusion of polysulfides through the cell and reduce the charge transfer resistance. The polar nature of the PC-FGF cathode as well as highly porous structure of TiO~2~ provides both physical confinement and chemical interaction with polysulfides. The incorporation of polymeric compounds and TiO~2~ has also been proposed in the separator to enhance active material reutilization. Further research in Li − S batteries should be investigated not only demonstrates an effective cathode material, but also indicates the importance of separatror materials on battery performance.

CTAB

:   Cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

CV

:   Cyclic voltammogram

DME

:   1,2-dimethoxyethane

DOL

:   1,3-dioxolane

LiNO~3~

:   Lithium nitrite

LiTFSI

:   Lithium bis (trifluoromethane) sulfonamide lithium

NMP

:   N-methyl-2 pyrrolidone

PC-FGF

:   Polycarboxylate functionalized graphene

PDAAQ

:   1, 5-Poly diaminoanthraquinone

PVDF

:   Polyvinylidene fluoride

SEM

:   Scanning electron microscopy

TiO~2~

:   Titanium dioxide

**Publisher's Note**

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This work was financially supported by the scientific research projects funding of Istanbul Technical University.

This work presented here was performed in collaboration of all the authors. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

This work was financially supported by the scientific research projects funding of Istanbul Technical University.

All data used within this manuscript is available upon request.

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.