System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Logical Efficiency: Is the response logically efficient? The logic behind the response should have no redundant step, remaining simple and efficient. For tasks involving coding, the proposed solution should also consider time complexity.
Score 1: The logic behind the response is significantly inefficient and redundant, necessitating a complete reorganization of logic for clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The logic of the response lacks efficiency and conciseness, requiring a substantial reorganization for better optimization.
Score 3: The logic of the response is not efficient enough, necessitating major edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The logic of the response is largely efficient, but it still has some redundant steps. It could be handled from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The logic of the response is optimally efficient, requiring no further optimization.
Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
Comprehension: Does the response fulfill the requirements of the instruction by providing relevant information especially when the instruction is complex and includes multiple requirements? This includes responding in accordance with the explicit and implicit purpose of given instruction.
Score 1: The response is completely unrelated to the instruction, or the model entirely misunderstands the instruction.
Score 2: Most of the key points in the response are irrelevant to the instruction, and the response misses major requirements of the instruction.
Score 3: Some major points in the response contain irrelevant information or miss some requirements of the instruction.
Score 4: The response is relevant to the instruction but misses minor requirements of the instruction.
Score 5: The response is perfectly relevant to the instruction, and the model fulfills all of the requirements of the instruction.
[Instruction]
Implement a program to find the common elements in two arrays without using any extra data structures.

[Ground truth Answer]
You can implement this program using nested loops to compare elements between the two arrays. Here's an example in Python:

```python
def find_common_elements(array1, array2):
    print("The common elements are:")
    # Loop through all elements in the first array
    for i in range(len(array1)):
        # Loop through all elements in the second array
        for j in range(len(array2)):
            # Check if the elements are the same
            if array1[i] == array2[j]:
                # Print the common element
                print(array1[i])

# Example usage
array1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
array2 = [3, 4, 5, 6, 7]
find_common_elements(array1, array2)
```

This program will output the following:

```
The common elements are:
3
4
5
```

[Assistant's Response]
To find common elements between two arrays without using any extra data structures, we can use a straightforward approach involving nested loops. This method involves checking each element of the first array against each element of the second array to find matches. Here's a Python implementation of this approach:

```python
def find_common_elements(arr1, arr2):
    # Iterate through each element of the first array
    for i in range(len(arr1)):
        # Iterate through each element of the second array
        for j in range(len(arr2)):
            # If a common element is found, print it
            if arr1[i] == arr2[j]:
                print(arr1[i])
                break  # Break to avoid printing duplicates for the same element

# Example usage
array1 = [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
array2 = [4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

print("Common elements:")
find_common_elements(array1, array2)
```

### Explanation:
- We define a function `find_common_elements` that takes two arrays as input.
- The function uses two nested loops:
  - The outer loop iterates over each element of the first array (`arr1`).
  - The inner loop iterates over each element of the second array (`arr2`).
- When a common element is found (`arr1[i] == arr2[j]`), it is printed immediately.
- The `break` statement is used to exit the inner loop once a match is found, preventing duplicate outputs for the same element from `arr1`.

### Note:
This approach has a time complexity of O(n * m), where n and m are the lengths of the two arrays. While it is not the most efficient method for finding common elements, it satisfies the constraint of not using any additional data structures.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: