System: You are a helpful and precise assistant in checking the quality of the answer.
User: We would like to request your feedback on the performance of the response of the assistant to the user instruction displayed below. In the feedback, I want you to rate the quality of the response in these 3 categories according to each scoring rubric:

Commonsense Understanding: Is the model accurately interpreting world concepts for instructions that require a simulation of the expected result or necessitate commonsense or spatial reasoning?
Score 1: The model completely misinterprets world concepts or misunderstands commonsense knowledge.
Score 2: The model misinterprets crucial world concepts, potentially leading to misinformation.
Score 3: The model shows a few errors in its understanding of world concepts.
Score 4: A single, minor error exists in the model's comprehension of world concepts.
Score 5: The model accurately interprets world concepts without any errors.
Logical Robustness: Does the model ensure general applicability and avoid logical contradictions in its reasoning steps for an instruction that requires step-by-step logical process? This includes the consideration of edge cases for coding and mathematical problems, and the absence of any counterexamples.
Score 1: The logic of the model's response is completely incoherent.
Score 2: The model's response contains major logical inconsistencies or errors.
Score 3: The model's response contains some logical inconsistencies or errors, but they are not significant.
Score 4: The model's response is logically sound, but it does not consider some edge cases.
Score 5: The model's response is logically flawless and it takes into account all potential edge cases.
Conciseness: Is the response presented in a concise manner for the reader without any unnecessary information?
Score 1: The response is highly redundant or contains a lot of unnecessary information, requiring a complete rewrite for optimal clarity and efficiency.
Score 2: The response lacks conciseness and needs a substantial rewrite for better optimization.
Score 3: The response is somewhat concise but includes unnecessary information, requiring some edits for improved optimization.
Score 4: The response is mostly concise but could benefit from minor edits for better optimization.
Score 5: The response is optimally concise and does not contain any unnecessary information, requiring no further optimization.
[Instruction]
You will be given an objective and a set of basic actions listed in random order required to accomplish the objective. Determine the correct sequence of actions to successfully achieve the goal.\nGoal: Wait for the boarding time\nActions:\n- straighten ticket out\n- take ticket out when scanned\n- insert ticket into scanner\n- put left hand on rail to steady self\n- take the ticket from pocket\n- Wait for the boarding time\n- Scan the train ticket

[Ground truth Answer]
step0: Wait for the boarding time\nstep1: put left hand on rail to steady self\nstep2: take the ticket from pocket\nstep3: straighten ticket out\nstep4: insert ticket into scanner\nstep5: take ticket out when scanned\nstep6: Scan the train ticket

[Assistant's Response]
To successfully achieve the goal of waiting for the boarding time, the correct sequence of actions is as follows:

1. Take the ticket from pocket.
2. Straighten ticket out.
3. Insert ticket into scanner.
4. Scan the train ticket.
5. Take ticket out when scanned.
6. Put left hand on rail to steady self.
7. Wait for the boarding time.

This sequence ensures that you are prepared and ready to board when the time comes.

[The End of Assistant's Response]

Please give feedback on the assistant's responses. Also, provide the assistant with a score on a scale of 1 to 5 for each category, where a higher score indicates better overall performance. Make sure to give feedback or comments for each category first and then write the score for each category. Only write the feedback corresponding to the scoring rubric for each category. The scores of each category should be orthogonal, indicating that 'Efficiency of User Alignment' should not be considered for 'Readability of User Alignment' category, for example. 

Lastly, return a Python dictionary object that has skillset names as keys and the corresponding scores as values.

[System]



Assistant: