You are a helpful assistant generating synthetic data that captures *System 1* and *System 2* thinking, *creativity*, and *metacognitive reflection*. Follow these steps in sequence, using tags [sys1] and [end sys1] for *System 1* sections and [sys2] and [end sys2] for *System 2* sections.

1. *Identify System 1 and System 2 Thinking Requirements:*
   - Carefully read the text.
   - Identify parts of the text that require quick, straightforward responses (*System 1*). Mark these sections with [sys1] and [end sys1].
   - Identify parts that require in-depth, reflective thinking (*System 2*), marked with [sys2] and [end sys2].

2. *Apply Step-by-Step Problem Solving with Creativity and Metacognitive Reflection for System 2 Sections:*

   *2.1 Understand the Problem:*
   - Objective: Fully comprehend the issue, constraints, and relevant context.
   - Reflection: "What do I understand about this issue? What might I be overlooking?"
   - Creative Perspective: Seek hidden patterns or possibilities that could reveal deeper insights or innovative connections.

   *2.2 Analyze the Information:*
   - Objective: Break down the problem logically.
   - Reflection: "Am I considering all factors? Are there any assumptions that need challenging?"
   - Creative Perspective: Explore unique patterns or overlooked relationships in the data that could add depth to the analysis.

   *2.3 Generate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Propose at least 10 hypotheses, each with a Confidence Score (0.0 to 1.0) and Creative Score (0.0 to 1.0), reflecting originality, surprise, and utility.
   - Reflection: "Have I explored all possible explanations or approaches, both conventional and unconventional?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider novel angles that might provide unexpected insights.

   *2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:*
   - Objective: Make predictions, accounting for potential outcomes and obstacles.
   - Reflection: "What challenges might I face? Is my plan flexible for different scenarios?"
   - Creative Perspective: Visualize unforeseen outcomes and adapt plans to make use of them effectively.

   *2.5 Evaluate Hypotheses:*
   - Objective: Assess hypotheses based on feasibility, risk, and potential impact.
   - Evaluation: Refine Confidence and Creative Scores as needed.
   - Reflection: "Am I unbiased in my assessment? Which options fit best with the overall objectives?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify hidden opportunities or overlooked details in each hypothesis.

   *2.6 Select the Best Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Choose the most promising, strategic hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Why does this hypothesis stand out? How does it uniquely address the issue?"
   - Creative Perspective: Consider any underutilized potential in the selected approach.

   *2.7 Implement the Hypothesis:*
   - Objective: Outline actionable steps for testing the hypothesis.
   - Reflection: "Is this plan practical? What resources or preparation are required?"
   - Creative Perspective: Refine steps to maximize effectiveness and yield unexpected benefits.

   *2.8 Monitor and Review Progress:*
   - Objective: Review progress, noting areas for improvement.
   - Reflection: "What’s working well? What could be improved?"
   - Creative Perspective: Look for emerging patterns that could refine future approaches.

   *2.9 Reflect and Capture Insights:*
   - Objective: Summarize lessons learned and insights gained for future reference.
   - Reflection: "What new understanding has emerged from this process?"
   - Creative Perspective: Identify innovative insights or patterns that could be applied to similar challenges.

3. *Generate Text Output with Interleaved System 1 and System 2 Responses:*
   - Use the tags [sys1] and [sys2] throughout.
   - Aim for a lengthier, detailed response. Combine both direct, straightforward *System 1* insights and reflective, deeply analytical *System 2* segments to capture a blend of quick observations and thoughtful analysis.

---

### *Example Input Text:*

You are tasked with analyzing a sudden shift in customer preferences in a tech market. There has been a noticeable decline in demand for physical devices, with customers increasingly interested in digital-only options. The challenge is to understand this shift, generate hypotheses for why it might be occurring, and explore potential strategies for adapting to this new trend.

---

### *Processed Output with System 1 and System 2 Thinking:*

The tech market is experiencing a shift in customer demand, moving away from physical devices toward digital-only options.

[sys1]
Customer demand has shifted from physical devices to digital-only options.
We need to understand why this change is happening and find strategies to address it.
Key factors may include cost, convenience, and technological trends.
[end sys1]

[sys2]
**2.1 Understand the Problem:**
The goal is to understand the underlying reasons for the shift in demand from physical devices to digital-only options, then develop a strategy to adapt.

*Reflection:* 
"I understand that preferences are changing, but what might be driving this? Is it primarily cost, or are there other factors such as convenience or sustainability?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could there be a larger trend in digital minimalism or a preference for eco-friendly solutions that we’re missing? What unseen motivations might explain this shift?"

**2.2 Analyze the Information:**
There are multiple possible factors driving this shift, from economic influences to cultural shifts. It’s essential to isolate each factor and understand its impact.

*Reflection:* 
"Am I fully considering the various economic and social influences? Could there be a technological factor, like better internet speeds, that makes digital-only products more accessible?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Are there patterns or trends in other markets that could shed light on this shift? Could this be part of a larger trend toward virtual experiences?"

**2.3 Generate Hypotheses:**
1. Customers prefer digital options due to lower costs. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.4)
2. There’s a growing trend toward minimalism and reduced physical clutter. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.7)
3. Digital products offer greater flexibility and ease of use. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
4. Environmental concerns are pushing consumers away from physical goods. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.8)
5. Advances in tech make digital-only options more functional. (Confidence: 0.8, Creative: 0.5)
6. Pandemic-era remote work increased demand for digital solutions. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.6)
7. Media coverage of the environmental impact of physical devices affects preferences. (Confidence: 0.5, Creative: 0.7)
8. There’s an increase in global digital literacy, expanding market access. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)
9. Customers view digital as more convenient and scalable for future needs. (Confidence: 0.7, Creative: 0.5)
10. Younger consumers prefer the aesthetics and convenience of digital products. (Confidence: 0.6, Creative: 0.6)

*Reflection:* 
"Have I considered all possible influences? Are there any surprising factors that could explain this shift?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could specific social trends, like the rise of influencer culture or digital-first lifestyles, be influencing customer choices?"

**2.4 Anticipate Future Steps and Obstacles:**
*Objective:* Anticipate possible challenges, such as resistance from segments still preferring physical products.

*Reflection:* 
"What market obstacles might we face if we shift our focus to digital-only? Are there sub-segments that still prioritize physical products?"

*Creative Perspective:* 
"Could expanding digital options help us reach a more global audience? Are there emerging trends that we could leverage in our strategy?"

[end sys2]

[sys1]
To address this shift, consider a strategy that incorporates both digital-only offerings and educational campaigns about the benefits of digital solutions.
Use insights from customer feedback and current trends to guide product development.
Focus on flexibility and adaptation to cater to different customer segments.
[end sys1]


""" ONNX export script

Export PyTorch models as ONNX graphs.

This export script originally started as an adaptation of code snippets found at
https://pytorch.org/tutorials/advanced/super_resolution_with_onnxruntime.html

The default parameters work with PyTorch 1.6 and ONNX 1.7 and produce an optimal ONNX graph
for hosting in the ONNX runtime (see onnx_validate.py). To export an ONNX model compatible
with caffe2 (see caffe2_benchmark.py and caffe2_validate.py), the --keep-init and --aten-fallback
flags are currently required.

Older versions of PyTorch/ONNX (tested PyTorch 1.4, ONNX 1.5) do not need extra flags for
caffe2 compatibility, but they produce a model that isn't as fast running on ONNX runtime.

Most new release of PyTorch and ONNX cause some sort of breakage in the export / usage of ONNX models.
Please do your research and search ONNX and PyTorch issue tracker before asking me. Thanks.

Copyright 2020 Ross Wightman
"""
import argparse
import torch
import numpy as np

import onnx
import geffnet

parser = argparse.ArgumentParser(description='PyTorch ImageNet Validation')
parser.add_argument('output', metavar='ONNX_FILE',
                    help='output model filename')
parser.add_argument('--model', '-m', metavar='MODEL', default='mobilenetv3_large_100',
                    help='model architecture (default: mobilenetv3_large_100)')
parser.add_argument('--opset', type=int, default=10,
                    help='ONNX opset to use (default: 10)')
parser.add_argument('--keep-init', action='store_true', default=False,
                    help='Keep initializers as input. Needed for Caffe2 compatible export in newer PyTorch/ONNX.')
parser.add_argument('--aten-fallback', action='store_true', default=False,
                    help='Fallback to ATEN ops. Helps fix AdaptiveAvgPool issue with Caffe2 in newer PyTorch/ONNX.')
parser.add_argument('--dynamic-size', action='store_true', default=False,
                    help='Export model width dynamic width/height. Not recommended for "tf" models with SAME padding.')
parser.add_argument('-b', '--batch-size', default=1, type=int,
                    metavar='N', help='mini-batch size (default: 1)')
parser.add_argument('--img-size', default=None, type=int,
                    metavar='N', help='Input image dimension, uses model default if empty')
parser.add_argument('--mean', type=float, nargs='+', default=None, metavar='MEAN',
                    help='Override mean pixel value of dataset')
parser.add_argument('--std', type=float,  nargs='+', default=None, metavar='STD',
                    help='Override std deviation of of dataset')
parser.add_argument('--num-classes', type=int, default=1000,
                    help='Number classes in dataset')
parser.add_argument('--checkpoint', default='', type=str, metavar='PATH',
                    help='path to checkpoint (default: none)')


def main():
    args = parser.parse_args()

    args.pretrained = True
    if args.checkpoint:
        args.pretrained = False

    print("==> Creating PyTorch {} model".format(args.model))
    # NOTE exportable=True flag disables autofn/jit scripted activations and uses Conv2dSameExport layers
    # for models using SAME padding
    model = geffnet.create_model(
        args.model,
        num_classes=args.num_classes,
        in_chans=3,
        pretrained=args.pretrained,
        checkpoint_path=args.checkpoint,
        exportable=True)

    model.eval()

    example_input = torch.randn((args.batch_size, 3, args.img_size or 224, args.img_size or 224), requires_grad=True)

    # Run model once before export trace, sets padding for models with Conv2dSameExport. This means
    # that the padding for models with Conv2dSameExport (most models with tf_ prefix) is fixed for
    # the input img_size specified in this script.
    # Opset >= 11 should allow for dynamic padding, however I cannot get it to work due to
    # issues in the tracing of the dynamic padding or errors attempting to export the model after jit
    # scripting it (an approach that should work). Perhaps in a future PyTorch or ONNX versions...
    model(example_input)

    print("==> Exporting model to ONNX format at '{}'".format(args.output))
    input_names = ["input0"]
    output_names = ["output0"]
    dynamic_axes = {'input0': {0: 'batch'}, 'output0': {0: 'batch'}}
    if args.dynamic_size:
        dynamic_axes['input0'][2] = 'height'
        dynamic_axes['input0'][3] = 'width'
    if args.aten_fallback:
        export_type = torch.onnx.OperatorExportTypes.ONNX_ATEN_FALLBACK
    else:
        export_type = torch.onnx.OperatorExportTypes.ONNX

    torch_out = torch.onnx._export(
        model, example_input, args.output, export_params=True, verbose=True, input_names=input_names,
        output_names=output_names, keep_initializers_as_inputs=args.keep_init, dynamic_axes=dynamic_axes,
        opset_version=args.opset, operator_export_type=export_type)

    print("==> Loading and checking exported model from '{}'".format(args.output))
    onnx_model = onnx.load(args.output)
    onnx.checker.check_model(onnx_model)  # assuming throw on error
    print("==> Passed")

    if args.keep_init and args.aten_fallback:
        import caffe2.python.onnx.backend as onnx_caffe2
        # Caffe2 loading only works properly in newer PyTorch/ONNX combos when
        # keep_initializers_as_inputs and aten_fallback are set to True.
        print("==> Loading model into Caffe2 backend and comparing forward pass.".format(args.output))
        caffe2_backend = onnx_caffe2.prepare(onnx_model)
        B = {onnx_model.graph.input[0].name: x.data.numpy()}
        c2_out = caffe2_backend.run(B)[0]
        np.testing.assert_almost_equal(torch_out.data.numpy(), c2_out, decimal=5)
        print("==> Passed")


if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()