TITLE: Confirmed: Clinton Operatives in FBI Manufactured Russiagate
SENTENCE 1: As I noted in an editorial last week, President Donald Trump has only one viable option to repel the partisan lynch mob now nipping at his heels in the form of a taxpayer-funded pack of legal hyenas, masquerading as objective prosecutors under the droopy eyes of old reliable deep state hatchet man Robert Swan Mueller III, the special counsel appointed to "investigate" the Clinton-Podesta-Schiff-Democrat Party-Corporate Media fabricated Russia collusion delusion.
SENTENCE 2: swamp lawyers and arrogant federal careerists, as firings and other departures quickly erode the carefully-contrived, totally-counterfeit veneer of credibility ascribed to Mueller and his henchpeople, my advice to the president has only become more apropos…and more imperative.
SENTENCE 3: As the GOP Congress finally begins to stir, as rapid-fire events make it increasingly impossible to deny the true nature of Mueller's handpicked partisan hit squad of Trump-hating, Hillary-supporting D.C.

Bias label: highly
Annotator rationales:
If you refer to the special counsel and legal figures using derogatory terms like "legal hyenas" and "deep state hatchet man," then you risk portraying these individuals as malicious actors without focusing on their actual roles and duties, potentially creating distrust and emotional bias among readers.
If the text describes Mueller’s team as a "partisan hit squad" of "Trump-hating, Hillary-supporting" figures, then it risks framing the investigation as a political attack rather than a legitimate inquiry, which may lead readers to question the credibility of the entire investigation based on perceived partisan bias.
If you describe the Russia collusion investigation as a "fabricated delusion" and label Robert Mueller as a "deep state hatchet man," then you risk presenting unverified claims and inflammatory language as established facts
If you refer to Mueller and his team as having a "totally-counterfeit veneer of credibility," then you risk presenting a subjective judgment about their integrity and professionalism without evidence.
If the text refers to federal careerists as "swamp lawyers" and "arrogant," then it risks reinforcing negative stereotypes about government employees, portraying them as inherently corrupt or self-serving without providing evidence of such behavior.
If the phrase "carefully-contrived, totally-counterfeit veneer of credibility" is used, then it risks undermining trust in the institutions and processes involved, suggesting that the entire system is based on deception and lack of authenticity, which could lead to readers questioning the legitimacy of the proceedings.