TITLE: Undemocratic Dems Cave on Shutdown
SENTENCE 1: Democracy for America executive director Charles Chamberlain said "(a) promise from known liars Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, or Donald Trump isn't worth the paper it's printed on, yet despite that fact, most Senate Democrats, including…Schumer, voted to allow Donald Trump to continue to subject an ever growing number of Dreamers to lives threatened by deportation from the only home they've ever known.
SENTENCE 2: A Journal editorial said Schumer betrayed Dems running for reelection in "Trump states (to) "placate his progressive base, and then he caved on the shutdown and ended up with the approval of neither."
SENTENCE 3: Progressive activist group CREDO political director Murshed Zaheed called Schumer "the worst negotiator in Washington - even worse than Trump," adding:  "Any plan to protect Dreamers that relies on the word of serial liars like Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan, or Donald Trump is doomed to fail."

Bias label: highly
Annotator rationales:
If you state that Schumer is the worst negotiator in Washington without providing evidence or context, then you risk presenting a subjective opinion as an objective assessment.
If the text claims Schumer "caved on the shutdown," then it risks oversimplifying the political situation by reducing it to personal betrayal, which may lead readers to overlook the complexities of the legislative process and compromise involved.
If the text calls certain political figures "serial liars" and compares Schumer's negotiating skills to Trump’s, then it risks framing the issue in personal terms rather than focusing on the political and policy debates, which could distract from a constructive discourse about the Dreamers' protection.
If you state that Senate Democrats voted to allow Dreamers to be threatened by deportation, then you risk presenting a complex political decision as a direct cause of harm without acknowledging the nuances of legislative processes and negotiations.
If you refer to specific politicians as "known liars" without providing evidence of their dishonesty, then you risk presenting a subjective judgment as an objective fact.