TITLE: Former NYPD Commisioner: Impossible FBI Reviewed 650,000 Emails In Only 8 Days
SENTENCE 1: In a tweet, Bernard Kerik revealed what appears to be the statistical impossibility of the FBI’s investigation, given that there are 691,200 seconds in 8 days, (the time since the FBI began their investigation,) meaning that they reviewed each email in just over a second.
SENTENCE 2: One possible explanation for the speed of the investigation is that the FBI used smart machines that honed in on relevant emails, meaning they quickly excluded the emails of Hillary Clinton’s aid Huma Abedin and managed to focus on what could be incriminating material.
SENTENCE 3: — Bernard B. Kerik (@BernardKerik) November 6, 2016  Meanwhile former director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, General Michael Flynn, pointed out that it took the FBI over a year to review 60,000 emails before Clinton was cleared back in July, yet having found new evidence on a server with 650,000 emails, it took just eight days.

Bias label: moderately
Annotator rationales:
If you suggest that the FBI "used smart machines" as a definitive explanation, then you risk implying that this was an established fact. A more precise alternative could be: "Some have speculated that the FBI may have used filtering algorithms to identify relevant emails, which could have expedited the process."
If you contrast the FBI's review times for different email volumes without providing context about the specific circumstances of each investigation, then you risk creating an impression of inconsistent standards without evidence.
If you state that reviewing 650,000 emails in 8 days is statistically impossible, then you risk presenting a technical limitation without acknowledging potential technological solutions or methods that could enable such a review.