TITLE: Saturday Humor: Counter-think Animation That Mocks The Bitcoin Crypto-Lunacy
SENTENCE 1: “hilarious two-minute animation that satirizes all the brain dead arguments of Bitcoin cultists who’ve convinced themselves that Bitcoin isn’t a speculative bubble…”    by Mike Adams via Natural News  (Natural News) As part of a new series of hilarious animations being released on Counterthink.com, today I’m releasing “Sh*tcoin and Buttcoin,” a hilarious two-minute animation that satirizes all the brain dead arguments of Bitcoin cultists who have convinced themselves that Bitcoin isn’t a speculative bubble.
SENTENCE 2: At the same time, Bitcoin’s supposed usefulness as a payment system has utterly collapsed, and there’s even a report that a Bitcoin conference has stopped accepting Bitcoin as payment for the conference due to sky-high transaction costs and super slow “clearing” of such transactions, often exceeding two days.
SENTENCE 3: Manipulating the crypto markets is child’s play for the central banks, which will no doubt engineer a panic selloff or cyber attack on the blockchain as a means to destroy the credibility of crypto in the minds of the public.

Bias label: moderately
Annotator rationales:
If you state that Bitcoin's usefulness as a payment system has "utterly collapsed," then you risk presenting a subjective assessment as an established fact without acknowledging alternative perspectives or providing evidence.
If you claim that central banks will "no doubt engineer" a selloff or attack, then you risk presenting speculation as fact. A more neutral phrasing, such as "There are concerns that central banks could influence the market through regulatory actions or financial maneuvers," would keep the statement within the realm of reasoned analysis rather than conspiracy.
If you use "brain dead arguments" and "Bitcoin cultists," then you risk dismissing opposing viewpoints in a way that is emotionally charged rather than analytical. A more neutral phrasing like "satirizes common arguments in favor of Bitcoin" would maintain a critical tone without unnecessary bias.