TITLE: Michael Moore: ‘Disrupt the Inauguration’
SENTENCE 1: It must be made clear to the whole world that the vast majority of people in the United States do not support his presidency or consent to his rule.”  The organization is planning protests on inauguration day in D.C., but insists that “If you can’t make it to Washington, DC on January 20, take to the streets wherever you are.”  There’s also a worldwide call to action: “If you are living outside the US, you can take action at US embassies, borders, or other symbols of neocolonial power.
SENTENCE 2: Silence is not an option https://t.co/HSmP3pREvy — Michael Moore (@MMFlint) December 7, 2016  Moore’s tweet linked to a webpage for DisruptJ20, a social justice campaign calling for “a bold mobilization against the inauguration of Donald Trump on January 20, 2017.”  “We call on all people of good conscience to join in disrupting the ceremonies,” the website reads.
SENTENCE 3: “It is the responsibility of this minority of Democrats in Congress to block, obstruct, disrupt, and do whatever they can to prevent the onslaught that is going to happen with Donald Trump, that the American people do not support,” Moore said Tuesday.

Bias label: highly
Annotator rationales:
If you claim that the vast majority of people in the U.S. did not support Trump’s presidency, then you should provide concrete polling data or election statistics to back up this assertion, as it may be misleading.
If you suggest taking action at US embassies or other symbols of power internationally, then you risk encouraging actions that could be perceived as interference in diplomatic relations.
If you state that silence is not an option, then you risk presenting a subjective stance as an absolute truth without acknowledging alternative perspectives.
If you call for disrupting official ceremonies, then you risk encouraging actions that could be seen as disrespectful or unlawful.
If you state that it's the responsibility of Democrats to block and obstruct, then you risk presenting a partisan political stance as an objective duty without acknowledging alternative viewpoints.
If you claim that Americans do not support Trump, then you risk portraying a claim without any verified evidence.
If you encourage people to take to the streets wherever they are, then you risk inciting disruptive behavior without providing context about the nature of the protests.