adsabs/AstroCLIMB huggingface dataset:
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Global view of the ground tracks of the 49 prime-mission flybys, color- and symbol-coded with respect to reconnaissance. (a) Global view with inset box showing the location of panel (b), which shows the cluster of equatorial flybys more clearly. Rank 1* reconable flybys are cyan solid lines. Rank 2* reconable flybys are yellow solid lines. The actual reconable portion (defined in Section 2.1) of each flyby is shown by the thicker line toward the center of each ground track. Rank 2 supporting flybys are yellow dashed lines. Rank 3 supporting flybys are magenta dashed lines. All other nonapplicable flybys are thin dashed/dotted gray lines. The base mosaic is made from Galileo SSI data, as displayed in the Europa Clipper planning tool “Cadmus” (J. Kampmeier 2024).
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E5 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 31°S, 179°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E22 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 0°N/S, 157°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Comparison of the E19 ground track to the map of the intensity of the 230 nm NaCl absorption feature. Left: map of intensity of NaCl 230 nm absorption feature by S. K. Trumbo et al. (2022). Right: detail of the area in which the ground track of E19 crosses the surface (shown in purple, with reconable portion shown by a thicker line). The closest approach point of the flyby is at 1°S, 201°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E24 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. A moon crescent symbol indicates that the crossing flyby occurs at nighttime. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 16°N, 152°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E34 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 13°N, 358°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E32 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 57°N, 359°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E42 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The area is only reconable when acceptable margins are taken into account, as highlighted by two white dashed delimiters (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 30°S, 359°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E13 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The area is only reconable when acceptable margins are taken into account, as highlighted by two white dashed delimiters (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 1°N, 185°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E34 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 13°N, 358°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E24 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 16°N, 152°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E32 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 57°N, 359°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E13 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The area is only reconable when acceptable margins are taken into account, as highlighted by two white dashed delimiters (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 1°N, 185°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E43 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 37°S, 338°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E21 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. Reconable flyby(s) that this flyby crosses over are shown in pink ground track(s), with the reconable portion(s) being thicker pink lines. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 0°N/S, 202°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E48 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The EIS WAC opportunities are shown for 0°–90° solar incidence angle, and thus none are plotted for the nighttime portion of this flyby. Reconable flyby(s) that this flyby crosses over are shown in pink ground track(s), with the reconable portion(s) being thicker pink lines. The gray shaded area in the middle and on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 52°N, 180°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E36 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. Reconable flyby(s) that this flyby crosses over are shown in pink ground track(s), with the reconable portion(s) being thicker pink lines. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 30°S, 357°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E3 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The EIS WAC opportunities are shown for 0°–90° solar incidence angle, and thus none are plotted for this nighttime flyby. Reconable flyby(s) that this flyby crosses over are shown in pink ground track(s), with the reconable portion(s) being thicker pink lines. The gray shaded area (everywhere but the far left) indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 45°S, 334°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E18 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. Reconable flyby(s) that this flyby crosses over are shown in pink ground track(s), with the reconable portion(s) being thicker pink lines. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 1°S, 155°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E6 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. Reconable flyby(s) that this flyby crosses over are shown in pink ground track(s), with the reconable portion(s) being thicker pink lines. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 6°S, 179°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E43 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 37°S, 338°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E42 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The area is only reconable when acceptable margins are taken into account, as highlighted by two white dashed delimiters (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 30°S, 359°E.