adsabs/AstroCLIMB huggingface dataset:
Paper: High-speed Boulders and the Debris Field in DART Ejecta
Authors: Tony L. Farnham, Jessica M. Sunshine, Masatoshi Hirabayashi, Carolyn M. Ernst, R. Terik Daly, Harrison F. Agrusa, Olivier S. Barnouin, Jian-Yang Li, Kathryn M. Kumamoto, Megan Bruck Syal, Sean E. Wiggins, Evan Bjonnes, Angela M. Stickle, Sabina D. Raducan, Andrew F. Cheng, David A. Glenar, Ramin Lolachi, Timothy J. Stubbs, Eugene G. Fahnstock, Marilena Amoroso, Ivano Bertini, John R. Brucato, Andrea Capannolo, Gabriele Cremonese, Massimo Dall'Ora, Vincenzo Della Corte, J. D. P. Deshapriya, Elisabetta Dotto, Igor Gai, Pedro H. Hasselmann, Simone Ieva, Gabriele Impresario, Stavro L. Ivanovski, Michèle Lavagna, Alice Lucchetti, Francesco Marzari, Elena Mazzotta Epifani, Dario Modenini, Maurizio Pajola, Pasquale Palumbo, Simone Pirrotta, Giovanni Poggiali, Alessandro Rossi, Paolo Tortora, Marco Zannoni, Giovanni Zanotti, Angelo Zinzi
Figure caption: Close-up of the ejecta cloud at 159 s with Dimorphos visible through a gap in the filaments. The limb and shadow are highlighted. In the absence of ejecta, the portions of Dimorphos that are visible here would be fully illuminated (e.g., bright limb; compare the disk of Didymos in Figure 4(c)).
Paper: High-speed Boulders and the Debris Field in DART Ejecta
Authors: Tony L. Farnham, Jessica M. Sunshine, Masatoshi Hirabayashi, Carolyn M. Ernst, R. Terik Daly, Harrison F. Agrusa, Olivier S. Barnouin, Jian-Yang Li, Kathryn M. Kumamoto, Megan Bruck Syal, Sean E. Wiggins, Evan Bjonnes, Angela M. Stickle, Sabina D. Raducan, Andrew F. Cheng, David A. Glenar, Ramin Lolachi, Timothy J. Stubbs, Eugene G. Fahnstock, Marilena Amoroso, Ivano Bertini, John R. Brucato, Andrea Capannolo, Gabriele Cremonese, Massimo Dall'Ora, Vincenzo Della Corte, J. D. P. Deshapriya, Elisabetta Dotto, Igor Gai, Pedro H. Hasselmann, Simone Ieva, Gabriele Impresario, Stavro L. Ivanovski, Michèle Lavagna, Alice Lucchetti, Francesco Marzari, Elena Mazzotta Epifani, Dario Modenini, Maurizio Pajola, Pasquale Palumbo, Simone Pirrotta, Giovanni Poggiali, Alessandro Rossi, Paolo Tortora, Marco Zannoni, Giovanni Zanotti, Angelo Zinzi
Figure caption: Plot showing the cumulative size distribution of the 104 ejected boulders measured in this study, with error bars that reflect the general uncertainties on the radii.
Paper: Rotationally Resolved Near-infrared Spectroscopy of Three Large Eurybates Family Members
Authors: Anicia Arredondo
Figure caption: Spectra of Eurybates and Zarex from previous studies (red) compared to the spectra presented in this work (black). The spectra were digitized using Web Plot Digitizer (F. Marin et al. 2017). Data are normalized to unity at 1.0 μm, with the exception of I. Wong et al. (2024), which was renormalized at 1.7 μm.
Paper: Rotationally Resolved Near-infrared Spectroscopy of Three Large Eurybates Family Members
Authors: Anicia Arredondo
Figure caption: Spectra obtained from the first (black), second (red), and third (blue) observations of each JT. The shaded region indicates the standard deviation between the three binned points. In all cases, the spectra are similar within the errors. Vertical gray bars indicate where the atmosphere is unstable and causes noisy spectra. All spectra have been normalized to unity at 1 μm.
Paper: Rotationally Resolved Near-infrared Spectroscopy of Three Large Eurybates Family Members
Authors: Anicia Arredondo
Figure caption: Average NIR spectrum of each target (gray) concatenated with the VIS spectrum from S. Fornasier et al. (2007; black) and compared to taxonomic templates of C types (green) and P types (blue) from F. E. DeMeo et al. (2009). Spectra are normalized to unity at 0.55 μm.
Paper: Rotationally Resolved Near-infrared Spectroscopy of Three Large Eurybates Family Members
Authors: Anicia Arredondo
Figure caption: Spectral slope measured between 0.95 and 2.30 μm for each observation (black dots) compared to the slope of the average spectrum (red dashed line). The full rotational phases covered during each observation are highlighted with gray bars.
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: QHF assessment of the viability of archaea/methanogens in a modeled TRAPPIST-1e-like planet’s surface habitat. (a) Connections between the model modules. Red are priors, blue are calculated values, and green is the viability model. (b) Relative probability distributions of key parameters. (c) The distribution of calculated viability as function of surface temperature and pressure.
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: Overview of the NExSS Framework for Habitability. The framework assesses the suitability of habitats for model organisms/ecosystems. The potential habitats are described through a combination of system/planet-specific data and priors informed by exoplanet statistics. Habitat suitability is assessed by applying a function specific to species/organisms to the habitat properties. The outcomes are probabilistic in nature. This framework is both flexible and specific. A special case of habitat suitability is included that corresponds to “surface liquid habitability.”
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: Visual summary of key considerations and arguments about the nature and scope of the definition and use of the term “habitable.” There are strong and valid arguments both for a simpler and more specific meaning and for a more complex and more universal meaning. Any single definition for “habitability” fails to meet the majority of the requirements.
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: Comparison of model predictions for surface conditions of a TRAPPIST-1e-like planet and a TRAPPIST-1f-like planet compared to the environmental conditions required by our cyanobacteria model. Although both planets are likely to have surface conditions that allow stable liquid water, a TRAPPIST-1e-like planet would likely be too warm to allow cyanobacteria (and terrestrial oxygenic photosynthesis) to exist.
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: Illustration of the basis of the Framework for Habitability: the comparison of the environmental conditions predicted by the habitat model and the environmental conditions required by the metabolism model.
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: Probability distributions for key prior and modeled parameters for a TRAPPIST-1f-like planet (based on the same module connections shown in Figure 5).
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: QHF model assessment for a TRAPPIST-1e-like planet and cyanobacteria metabolism model for example 2. Panels (a) and (b) are the same as in Figure 5.
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: Same as Figure 5 but for a TRAPPIST-1f-like planet.
Paper: A Terminology and Quantitative Framework for Assessing the Habitability of Solar System and Extraterrestrial Worlds
Authors: Dániel Apai, Rory Barnes, Matthew M. Murphy, Tim Lichtenberg, Noah Tuchow, Régis Ferrière, Kevin Wagner, Antonin Affholder, Renu Malhotra, Baptiste Journaux, Allona Vazan, Ramses Ramirez, Abel Méndez, Stephen R. Kane, Veronica H. Klawender
Figure caption: Overview of the temperature ranges in which representative types of terrestrial organisms are biologically active (i.e., likely to complete life cycles).
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Rover traverse and helicopter flight maps. Maps showing the missions carried out by (a) the rover and (b) helicopter during the simulated joint rover-helicopter mission. White arrows show the viewing orientation of oblique images acquired by the helicopter. Image basemap: 2018 UAS orthomosaic.
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Landscape and outcrop images from the Sol 100–101 positions. (a) Sol 100 Navcam showing the landscape in the vicinity of the simulation starting position. (b) “Hippogriff” mudcrack target imaged on Sol 101. (c) Coarsely crystalline igneous cobble (Sol 100 AEGIS target) in the Sol 100 starting point workspace. (d) RMI image of the Sol 100 AEGIS target. (e) Sandy-pebbly bedforms exposed in a small cliff in the Navcam mosaic of the Sol 100 starting point. (f) Potential anticlinal fold structure (black arrows) observed in the Sol 101 Navcam on the slope of Grimmauld Place. (g) Resistant layered caprock of the “Durmstrang” target acquired on Sol 101.
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: The Specialis Revelio Workspace. (a) Sol 102 Navcam view of the Specialis Revelio workspace. (b) Turretcam image of the Bludger nodule acquired on Sol 104. Yellow arrows point to deformed laminations around the base of the nodule, white arrow points to lamination in the upper part of the nodule. (c) Fizzing Whizbees target imaged by Turretcam on Sol 103. Yellow arrow points to subtle thin laminations within the outcrop.
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Visible to near-infrared (VISIR) reflectance spectra collected during the simulation. (a) VISIR spectra collected by the rover. The spectra displayed (and their vertical offsets in parentheses) include Sol 100 AEGIS (+0.65), Sol 101 Hippogriff (+0.4), Sol 102, “Lumos” (+0.3), Sol 102 AEGIS Twilfitt and Tattings (+0.1), Sol 103 AEGIS (+0.1), Sol 103, Venomous Tentacula (+0.05), and Sol 103 Bludger (−0.05). (b) VISIR spectra collected by the helicopter. The spectra displayed (with no vertical offsets) include Sol 101 “Flutterby Bush,” Sol 102 “Cleansweep,” and Sol 103 “Chizpurfle.” (c) Laboratory reference spectra from NASA’s Reflectance Laboratory. Spectra displayed are calcite (CACA10), montmorillonite, (CAMO02), hectorite (C1EA27A), chlorite (C1EA14), illite (C1JB782A), and goethite (CAHO03). All reference spectra are of <45 μm particle size. All three subplots have reference lines at 1415, 1910, 2212, and 2340 nm.
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Informal landmark names and the photogeologic map constructed for the ROI during strategic planning. (a) Analog orbiter orthomosaic basemap at HiRISE-equivalent resolution (25 cm pixel−1) showing the major informally named landmarks of the mission simulation. (b) Geologic units mapped in the ROI based on differences in color, morphology, and weathering style observed in the analog HIRISE basemap.
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Mission simulation field site at the Rainbow Basin Natural Area near Barstow, California, USA. (a) Rainbow Basin Natural Area (yellow star) relative to the city of Barstow and nearby major highways. (b) The region of interest (ROI, outlined in yellow) explored in this simulation overlaid on the major geologic units and structures within Rainbow Basin after N. P. Lang et al. (2011). Image basemap credit: Copernicus Sentinel-2 provided by EOX IT.
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Major element compositions for the rover’s LIBS and XRF targets. (a) A-CN-K diagram. (b) A-CNK-FM diagram. (c) Plot of K2O vs. SiO2. (d) Plot of MgO vs. SiO2. (e) Plot of FeO vs. MgO.
Paper: Simulating Science Operations for a Joint Rover-helicopter Mission Architecture in a Mars Analog Setting
Authors: Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred J. Calef, Samantha J. Gwizd, Jeffrey F. Schroeder, Joana R. C. Voigt, Thorsteinn Kristinsson, Peter Schroedl, Jahnavi Shah, Matthew Varnam, Catherine D. Neish, Reid P. Perkins, Sashank Vanga, Michael S. Bramble, Andrea Donnellan, Jeffrey T. Osterhout, Michael Tuite, Brett B. Carr, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Raman spectra of the Bludger and Fizzing Whizbees targets. (a) Raman spectrum from the Bludger nodule target acquired on Sol 104. (b) Raman spectrum of the Fizzing Whizbees bedrock target acquired on Sol 104.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E22 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 0°N/S, 157°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E19 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. A moon crescent symbol indicates that the crossing flyby occurs at nighttime. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 1°S, 201°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Large arcuate depressions close to the E5 ground track, which are proposed as possible signs of True Polar Wander (red and white arrows; P. Schenk et al. 2008, 2020). The white box highlights an area where Galileo SSI and NIMS mosaics (E14ESWEDGES01, 14ENSUCOMP01A) are available (adapted from J. H. Shirley et al. 2010) and shows where part of a wedge-shaped band may have been resurfaced (L. M. Prockter et al. 2017). The black dashed ovals cover the same area of the surface. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 31°S, 179°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E5 projected on a Europa basemap (U.S. Geological Survey 2022). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). EIS WAC opportunities are projected and colored by solar incidence angle: these are indicative of the areas in which observations could be acquired. We highlight crossovers with supporting and other reconable flybys (see Table 1) in the white boxes, which include the crossover altitude and rank of the crossing flyby. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 31°S, 179°E.
Paper: Potential Landing Sites: A Comprehensive Reconnaissance Assessment of the Europa Clipper Trajectory
Authors: Jennifer E. C. Scully, Ines Belgacem, Rutu Parekh, Cyril Grima, Cynthia B. Phillips, Kathleen L. Craft, Geoffrey C. Collins, Charlie Detelich, Erin J. Leonard, Ishan Mishra, G. Wesley Patterson, Louise M. Prockter, Angela M. Stickle, Sarah S. Sutton, Danielle Y. Wyrick, Catherine M. Elder, Alfred S. McEwen, Colleen M. O'Shea, Jordi E. Turner
Figure caption: Ground track of E19 projected on Europa’s geological map (simplified version of E. J. Leonard et al. 2024). Different altitudes are represented by the ground-track line color, as defined in the key. The reconable area is highlighted by a thicker yellow line and white box. Two white dashed delimiters extend this reconable area to include acceptable margins (as defined in Section 2.1). Names of key features are included in white text. The gray shaded area on the right indicates Europan nighttime. The closest approach point of the flyby is at 1°S, 201°E.