adsabs/AstroCLIMB huggingface dataset:
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Distributions of OLS-derived coefficients A and B for both single-station (blue points) and multistation averaged (orange points) period fits.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Histograms showing the distributions of bolide parameters available in our data set: peak-brightness altitude, source-to-station distance, entry velocity, total impact energy (on a log scale), entry angle, impactor diameter, dynamic strength (also log-scaled), impactor density, and the Tisserand parameter.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Histograms showing the spread in coefficients A and B as a function of populations of single and averaged detections. These include all our fits after outliers were removed.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: (a) Wind velocity along the source–station path, plotted against propagation distance. (b) Doppler-corrected vs. measured period. (c) Difference between Doppler-corrected and measured periods, showing distance-dependent variations. (d) Zoomed-in version of (b) for shorter periods, again showing how stratospheric winds can alter observed infrasound periods.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Global map showing all 138 bolides (red circles) investigated in this work and 59 distinct infrasound stations that recorded detections (gray triangles).
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Coefficients A (a) and B (b) from ﹩\mathrm{log}\left(E\right)=A\mathrm{log}\left(P\right)+B﹩, plotted for numerous bolide subgroups. Each point represents a distinct partition (e.g., by altitude, angle, distance, or fragmentation type), with error bars indicating fit uncertainties. Reference lines from N. Gi & P. Brown (2017), T. A. Ens et al. (2012), R. Whitaker & J. Mutschlecner (2006), R. W. Whitaker (2023), and D. O. Revelle (1997) are shown for comparison, demonstrating how geometry (e.g., shallow vs. steep angles) and multifragmentation (LC class 1 vs. 2) can shift slopes and intercepts away from classic global values. The circles and diamonds represent fits for single-station and averaged events, respectively.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Schematic representation of the procedure for measuring infrasound signal parameters and quantifying the signal period. Each ZC is marked where the waveform crosses the zero-pressure line. In this example, ZCs labeled as ZC1, ZC2, ZC3, and ZC4 define the segments used to calculate the period. Notably, based on the analyst’s judgment and the appearance of the waveform, ZC1 may be selected either before the maximum amplitude or at its onset. The green and gray sets of ZCs illustrate these possible scenarios. This flexibility in choosing ZC1 ensures that the extracted period accurately reflects the characteristics of the shock signal and accommodates variations in waveform morphology. Full-cycle ZCs define discrete periods. Averaging these discrete periods yields the mean signal period, and the standard deviation provides an uncertainty estimate. The maximum and minimum amplitudes (±A) are labeled, and the peak-to-peak amplitude is computed as (+A)+∣−A∣. This method enables consistency when extracting signal parameters such as amplitude, period, and their statistical variability.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Correlation matrices for averaged-period bolides across (a) all events, (b) single-burst (LC class 1) events, and (c) multiburst (LC class 2) events. Each panel shows pairwise Spearman correlation coefficients among various parameters: infrasound period, CNEOS energy, entry angle, velocity, diameter, density, dynamic strength, and peak-brightness altitude.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Log–log plot of total impact energy vs. signal period comparing (a) published period–energy relations and those derived in this study. Fits for ingle station detections (b) and averaged periods (c) are plotted separately alongside earlier studies. In panel (d), we show the global fits alongside LC1 and LC2 (averaged).
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Coefficient A and B pairs for single detections (navy blue circles) and averaged detections (diamonds). Single detections derived with OLS (light green circles) are also shown, but some extreme points are cut off in this zoomed in version. Error bars for individual points are omitted to maintain clarity. The global fits, with error bars, appear as a triangle (Equation (4)) and a square (Equation (5)).
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Detection range (km) vs. total impact energy (kt) for all infrasound stations that recorded a positive signal. The red line represents the upper-range envelope (yellow-black circles) derived in this study, while the black line shows the relation from T. A. Ens et al. (2012), ﹩\mathrm{log}\left(R\right)=0.33\mathrm{log}(E)+3.79﹩. Each blue circle corresponds to a unique detection, illustrating how measured ranges vary with event yield; the superposed curves provide a simple upper bound on the distances over which infrasound from bolides of given energies can be detected.
Paper: Multiparameter Constraints on Empirical Infrasound Period-Yield Relations for Bolides and Implications for Planetary Defense
Authors: Elizabeth A. Silber, Josep M. Trigo-Rodríguez, Iyare Oseghae, Eloy Peña-Asensio, Mark Boslough, Rodney Whitaker, Christoph Pilger, Philip Lubin, Vedant Sawal, Claus Hetzer, Randy Longenbaugh, Peter Jenniskens, Brin Bailey, Esther Mas Sanz, Patrick Hupe, Alexander N. Cohen, Thom R. Edwards, Sasha Egan, Reynold E. Silber, Summer C. Czarnowski, Miro Ronac Giannone
Figure caption: Histograms of coefficients A and B for single detections (panels (a) and (b)) and averaged detections (panels (c) and (d)). The OLS results are shown with hatched bars, while the bootstrap results are shown with solid bars. Note that the axes scale is different in all panels.
Paper: Continued Photometric Monitoring Supports Long-term Dynamical Evolution in the Young Binary Star–Disk System KH 15D
Authors: Luke Lamitina, Lynne Hillenbrand, Michael Poon
Figure caption: Illustration of the M. Poon et al. (2021) model for the KH-15D system. Top and middle: to approximate the warped disk, this model uses an opaque screen bounded by a leading and trailing edge. Within each panel, the screen is nearly stationary, as the binary orbit (every 48 days) allows Star B and/or A to peek out from below the trailing edge. The dotted curves show the binary orbit behind the screen. From left to right, each edge of the screen evolves linearly in time, with the ability to rotate and move along the sky plane. This motion parameterizes the slow, rigid precession of the warped disk, where the leading (trailing) edge is the inner (outer) disk radius. Relative to the top panels, the middle panel is zoomed in 10 times along the vertical axis. Bottom: the lightcurve of KH 15D evolves substantially over a single binary orbit (within each panel) and as its warped disk precesses (across each panel). A key feature in the years ∼2018−2023 is the midphase central rebrightening, due to the emergence of Star A peeking out from behind the disk.
Paper: Continued Photometric Monitoring Supports Long-term Dynamical Evolution in the Young Binary Star–Disk System KH 15D
Authors: Luke Lamitina, Lynne Hillenbrand, Michael Poon
Figure caption: Phased lightcurves produced by the knife-edge M. Poon et al. (2021) model extended to 2042, presented in calendar years. After 2042 the lightcurve is predicted to remain relatively flat giving a testable ending to the KH 15D story.