adsabs/AstroCLIMB huggingface dataset:
Paper: The Stability of a Dense Crust Situated on Small Bodies
Authors: Yoshinori Miyazaki, David J. Stevenson
Figure caption: (A) The increase in moment of inertia by a dense crust plotted as a function of density difference between the crust and the underlying mantle. Three different crustal thicknesses (1 km, solid; 20 km, dashed; 40 km, dotted) are assumed. (B) The growth timescale of the RT instability (Equation (7)) as a function of the moment of inertia increase by a dense crust. Viscosity (η) and its scale height (L) are calculated based on a surface heat flux of 8 mW m−2, a grain size of 0.1 mm, and a stress of 1 MPa. Because grain boundary sliding (GBS) is limited for ≳10% contamination of silicate (Qi et al. 2018), the timescale is likely to follow the estimate based on diffusion and dislocation creeps (red). The instability timescale shown here is a lower bound estimate, and a dense crust of <40 km thickness could survive over geological time on icy bodies.
Paper: The Stability of a Dense Crust Situated on Small Bodies
Authors: Yoshinori Miyazaki, David J. Stevenson
Figure caption: Densities of a partially molten mantle (black) and crust (green) are shown as a function of mantle melt fraction. A peridotitic mantle is assumed here, and crust is considered to be formed through the solidification of partial melt (red). Upon solidification, the partial melt becomes denser than the underlying mantle for a melt fraction larger than ∼0.33. Partial melt composition is calculated using MELTS (Ghiorso 1994), and the mineral composition and density of the solidified melt are predicted using Theriak-Domino (de Capitani & Petrakakis 2010).
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: (a) Image showing the Holuhraun lava flow. The black box indicates the location in (b). The image is sourced from Loftmyndir Einkahlutafélag (50 cm pixel–1). (b) Map of the 2022 rover traverse, showing the three mission phases and including remote science waypoints (green circles), sampling locations (yellow circles), and labeled sample names. The base map image is sourced from Scheidt & Hamilton (2019) and resampled to HiRISE resolution (25 cm pixel–1).
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Representative phase 1 (sols 101–104) images captured at the Asgard site. (a) MastCam mosaic of the Asgard outcrop. The white arrow indicates the location of the sample Ragnarok. The yellow arrow indicates a possible rounded squeeze-out. White boxes correspond to the locations of (b) and (c). (b) Red hue (yellow arrow) showing evidence for alteration. (c) White circular features initially hypothesized to represent secondary fluid flow and targeted for their proposed astrobiological significance. (d) Representative image showing dark-toned and light-toned sediment populations at Asgard. (e) Representative millimeter- to centimeter-scale vesicles on the older lava flow.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Representative phase 3 (108–111) images captured at the Valhalla site. (a) MastCam mosaic of the Valhalla promontory. The white arrow indicates the location of the sample Fenrir. (b) MastCam image of older lava flow target Hel. (c) MastCam image of Nidavellir, showing crust layers (white tracings). (d) Image of target Aegir showing millimeter-scale phenocrysts and millimeter–centimeter-scale vesicles. The yellow arrow indicates the location of the zoomed-in inset.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: MAHLI images of rover sample targets, including (a) Ragnarok (older lava flow), (b) 4 × 1 mosaic of Njord (light-toned sediment), (c) Fenrir (younger lava flow), and (d) Valkyrie (dark-toned sediment). Annotations in (d) highlight key features in the sediment population: (i) indicates the dark-toned sediment population, (ii) indicates the light-toned sediment population, and (iii) indicates examples of scoria.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Example target map with labeled target names and corresponding activities from sol 102 tactical planning. MCAM = MastCam; SCAM = SuperCam; AZ = azimuth.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Chart showing mission, sampling, and science objectives.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Representative phase 2 (sols 105–107) images captured at the Midgard site. (a) MastCam M100 of dark-toned sediment target Niflheim with overlying light-toned sediment. (b) Light-toned sediment and underlying dark-toned sediment. (c) Simulated wheel scuff, showing light-toned sediment and underlying dark-toned sediment. (d) RMI of light-toned sediment target Muspelheim, showing lithic grains.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: (a) Map depicting the initial rover traverse and the revised rover traverse. The initial rover traverse is shown in (b), and the revised rover traverse is shown in Figure 1(b). (b) Close-up view of the initial rover traverse. Both base maps are sourced from Loftmyndir Einkahlutafélag (50 cm pixel–1).
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Schematic detailing the application of the Mars 2020 planning structure to the 2022 RAVEN rover mission.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Representative VisIR plots showing (a) dark-toned sediment, (b) light-toned sediment, (c) older lava flow, and (d) younger lava flow targets. Black arrows in (a) show absorption features indicative of hydrated mineral phases.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Geochemical trends from APXS and SuperCam LIBS data. (a) TAS diagram showing the distribution of all rock and sediment targets in the basaltic andesite field. Inset zoomed-in view shown in the larger dashed box. (b) Alkali–iron–magnesium (FAM) ternary diagram showing tholeiitic and calc–alkaline trends for reference. (c) Al2O3 – CaO + Na2O + K2O – FeO(T) + MgO (A–CNK–FM) ternary diagram showing the distribution of all rock and sediment targets compared to representative mineral phases and the typical mafic chemical weathering trend.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Map showing the 2022 helicopter mission, including landing sites (white dots), sample localities (red dots), and flight paths (colored lines). Also shown for comparison is the 2022 rover traverse (white dashed line). The base map is sourced from Loftmyndir Einkahlutafélag. (50 cm pixel–1).
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Comparison of the rover and helicopter missions. (a) Chart showing the distribution of each phase for the rover (black) and helicopter (white) missions. (b) Chart showing the allotment of resources for the rover (red) and helicopter (blue) missions. Tonal differences correspond to percentage values, which are also listed in Table 6.
Paper: Comparing Rover and Helicopter Planetary Mission Architectures in a Mars Analog Setting in Iceland
Authors: Samantha Gwizd, Kathryn M. Stack, Raymond Francis, Fred Calef, Brett B. Carr, Chris Langley, Jamie Graff, Þorsteinn Hanning Kristinsson, Vilhjálmur Páll Thorarensen, Eiríkur Bernharðsson, Michael Phillips, Matthew Varnam, Nathan Hadland, Jahnavi Shah, Jeffrey Moersch, Udit Basu, Joana R. C. Voigt, Christopher W. Hamilton
Figure caption: Examples of light-toned zones of alteration identified from remotely sensed images. The black box in (a) indicates the area of the 2022 rover traverse for comparison. The white box in (a) indicates the location of (b). White arrows in (b) indicate light-toned zones of alteration. The base map is sourced from Loftmyndir Einkahlutafélag. (50 cm pixel–1).
Paper: Experimental Method for Measuring Cohesion of Regolith via Electrostatic Lofting
Authors: Charles T. Pett, Christine M. Hartzell
Figure caption: (A) An example of clumps and individual grains lofting captured by the high-speed camera. The +10 kV plate runs horizontally through the middle of the image, producing an electric field that accelerates negatively charged clumps upward. (B) Time-series image (evolved left to right) of a cropped region from the middle granular dune of the image in Figure 2(A). The times between panels 1–2 and 2–3 are 21.2 ms and 27.5 ms, respectively. The orange and yellow circles highlight two two-grain clumps, while the blue circle denotes an individual grain that appears in frame 2. All objects detach and climb in altitude over the three frames in the direction denoted by the arrows. The blue individual grain has a greater acceleration after detachment than the orange and yellow clumps. (C) Comparing the number of clumps lofted vs. the number of grains lofted in six experimental runs. The percentage of clumps lofted out of the total number of lofted objects in each run is given in parentheses. Clumps account for at least 8% of the lofted objects.
Paper: Experimental Method for Measuring Cohesion of Regolith via Electrostatic Lofting
Authors: Charles T. Pett, Christine M. Hartzell
Figure caption: (A) Experiments were conducted in an electrically grounded cylindrical vacuum chamber. A tungsten filament emitted 120 eV electrons. An electrically biased plate accelerated electrons toward the zirconia-silica microspheres and forced negatively charged individual grains and clumps upward. A high-speed camera viewing into the page (looking along the shorter side of the biased plate) captured the trajectory of lofted clumps. The figure is not to scale. (B) Steady-state electric field magnitude generated from the 6.4 cm wide biased plate shown here. The viewing plane is perpendicular to the camera plane of view in (A), looking along the longer side of the biased plate. The 10 cm wide graphite substrate (white) is 2 cm below and electrically floating.
Paper: Experimental Method for Measuring Cohesion of Regolith via Electrostatic Lofting
Authors: Charles T. Pett, Christine M. Hartzell
Figure caption: (A) and (D): the initial velocities for 14 clumps and 12 individual grains, including uncertainty of ±0.0074 m s−1. Clumps of the same size were grouped by color and shape. (B) and (E): the initial accelerations milliseconds after detachment for clumps and individual grains, including uncertainty of ±6.97 m s−2. Outlier clumps 9, 10, and 13 were not included in the average shown in (B) because they were greater than 3σ away from the mean. Similarly, outlier individual grains 1 and 8 were not included in the average shown in (E). (C) and (F): the cohesive force on clumps and individuals, derived from the initial acceleration, on the left y-axis. The cohesive force between two grain surfaces was distributed over half of the surface area of a grain. Thus, dividing the cohesive force by this contact area produced the corresponding tensile strength between a clump or individual and the bulk on the right y-axis.
Paper: Postperihelion Cometary Activity on the Outer Main-belt Asteroid 2005 XR132 
Authors: Yu-Chi Cheng, 宇棋 鄭, Bryce T. Bolin, Michael S. P. Kelley, D. Bodewits, Quanzhi Ye, 泉志 葉, Christoffer Fremling, Zhong-Yi Lin, 忠義 林, Ya-Lin Wu, 亞霖 吳, Reed L. Riddle, Wing-Huen Ip, 永烜 葉, Steven L. Groom, Russ R. Laher, 嶺亞 良主
Figure caption: The long-term light curve in the 2020 perihelion return. The crosses, triangles, and circles indicate measurements obtained with LOT, P200, and ZTF, respectively. The g- and i-band photometry have been scaled using the mean cometary colors from Solontoi et al. (2012). An offset was added to correct the Johnson R band to the r band in the LOT observation. The 30 day moving average and Subaru HSC-R2 brightness are shown in red and green lines with an indication of rotational amplitude and uncertainty shown by shading. The solid orange and blue curves in the bottom panel are the heliocentric and geocentric distance in the given time, respectively. The black triangle indicates the date we discovered XR132's comet-like activity.
Paper: Postperihelion Cometary Activity on the Outer Main-belt Asteroid 2005 XR132 
Authors: Yu-Chi Cheng, 宇棋 鄭, Bryce T. Bolin, Michael S. P. Kelley, D. Bodewits, Quanzhi Ye, 泉志 葉, Christoffer Fremling, Zhong-Yi Lin, 忠義 林, Ya-Lin Wu, 亞霖 吳, Reed L. Riddle, Wing-Huen Ip, 永烜 葉, Steven L. Groom, Russ R. Laher, 嶺亞 良主
Figure caption: The 1 Myr backward (left) and forward (right) orbital evolution of XR132. The top row demonstrates the probability map along the semimajor axis and perihelion distance during the 1 Myr simulation. Different dynamic groups are labeled following the definition given in the JPL Small-Body Database Query web service. The cyan cross is the initial orbit of the simulation. The bottom row shows the fraction of remaining clones per dynamical class with an indication of half-lifetime in vertical dashed lines.
Paper: Postperihelion Cometary Activity on the Outer Main-belt Asteroid 2005 XR132 
Authors: Yu-Chi Cheng, 宇棋 鄭, Bryce T. Bolin, Michael S. P. Kelley, D. Bodewits, Quanzhi Ye, 泉志 葉, Christoffer Fremling, Zhong-Yi Lin, 忠義 林, Ya-Lin Wu, 亞霖 吳, Reed L. Riddle, Wing-Huen Ip, 永烜 葉, Steven L. Groom, Russ R. Laher, 嶺亞 良主
Figure caption: The top row shows the syndyne and synchrone dust curves in cyan and red overlapped with the observing images taken on April 5 and May 16. The syndyne curves from left to right indicate dust grain sizes of 0.1, 1, and 10 mm, respectively, assuming the dust density is 1000 kg m−3. The synchrone curves are separate in 20 day steps clockwise from 20 to 160 days from left to right. The middle and bottom panels are dust simulated images with the observing data obtained in 2021 April and May. Stamps on the central column are the comet assume a low-speed ejection similar to dormant comets (Ye et al. 2016b); those on the right column assuming an activity driving by the sublimation of pure water ice (Whipple 1950). All the subplots are aligned with north up and east to the left in a 20″ × 20″ field of view.
Paper: Postperihelion Cometary Activity on the Outer Main-belt Asteroid 2005 XR132 
Authors: Yu-Chi Cheng, 宇棋 鄭, Bryce T. Bolin, Michael S. P. Kelley, D. Bodewits, Quanzhi Ye, 泉志 葉, Christoffer Fremling, Zhong-Yi Lin, 忠義 林, Ya-Lin Wu, 亞霖 吳, Reed L. Riddle, Wing-Huen Ip, 永烜 葉, Steven L. Groom, Russ R. Laher, 嶺亞 良主
Figure caption: The 2 kyr forward and backward orbital evolution in semimajor axis, perihelion distance, eccentricity, inclination, Tisserand parameter, and ﹩\sqrt{1-{e}^{2}}{\rm{\cos }}(i)﹩ constant to assess the conservation of angular momentum. The gray and blue curves are the evolution path of individual clones and the median value of all clones, respectively. The vertical dotted line indicates the beginning of the simulation.
Paper: Postperihelion Cometary Activity on the Outer Main-belt Asteroid 2005 XR132 
Authors: Yu-Chi Cheng, 宇棋 鄭, Bryce T. Bolin, Michael S. P. Kelley, D. Bodewits, Quanzhi Ye, 泉志 葉, Christoffer Fremling, Zhong-Yi Lin, 忠義 林, Ya-Lin Wu, 亞霖 吳, Reed L. Riddle, Wing-Huen Ip, 永烜 葉, Steven L. Groom, Russ R. Laher, 嶺亞 良主
Figure caption: The g′–r′ vs. r′–z′ color–color diagram of our P200 measurement (blue plus signs) and some related solar system body (Ofek 2012; Solontoi et al. 2012; Jewitt 2015). The plot is superimposed with the C-/S-/V-type asteroid surface color given by Jurić et al. (2002).
Paper: Postperihelion Cometary Activity on the Outer Main-belt Asteroid 2005 XR132 
Authors: Yu-Chi Cheng, 宇棋 鄭, Bryce T. Bolin, Michael S. P. Kelley, D. Bodewits, Quanzhi Ye, 泉志 葉, Christoffer Fremling, Zhong-Yi Lin, 忠義 林, Ya-Lin Wu, 亞霖 吳, Reed L. Riddle, Wing-Huen Ip, 永烜 葉, Steven L. Groom, Russ R. Laher, 嶺亞 良主
Figure caption: The Kozai–Lidov oscillation of sin(i) and e from our short-term simulation. This plot is made by only the data within the reliable time period between 1000 and 3000 CE.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Dependence of the RMSE on the wavelength step. The input data for the ASPECT 650–1600 nm and ASPECT 650–2450 nm grids imitate the transmission properties of the ASPECT instrument. The values for the approximate ASPECT step are highlighted.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: RMSE of the mineral chemical composition predictions for different wavelength ranges. The dashed color boxes indicate important wavelength regions to which the metric values are assigned.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: RMSE of the mineral modal abundance predictions for different wavelength ranges. The dashed color boxes indicate important wavelength regions to which the metric values are assigned.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Dependence of the RMSE on the normalization wavelength of the spectra.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Within-10-pp error metric of the mineral chemical composition predictions for different wavelength ranges. The dashed color boxes indicate important wavelength regions to which the metric values are assigned.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Within-10-pp error metric of the mineral modal abundance predictions for different wavelength ranges. The dashed color boxes indicate important wavelength regions to which the metric values are assigned.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Dependence of the within-10-pp error metric on the normalization wavelength of the spectra.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Dependence of the RMSE on the position of the dense window.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Web interface form.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Within-10-pp error metric of the clinopyroxene chemical composition predictions for different wavelength ranges.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: RMSE of the clinopyroxene chemical composition predictions for different wavelength ranges.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Dependence of the within-10-pp error metric on the wavelength step. The input data for the ASPECT 650–1600 nm and ASPECT 650–2450 nm grids imitate the transmission properties of the ASPECT instrument. The values for the approximate ASPECT step are highlighted.
Paper: Silicate Mineralogy from Vis–NIR Reflectance Spectra
Authors: David Korda, Tomáš Kohout
Figure caption: Dependence of the within-10-pp error metric on the position of the dense window.