Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew, Judge Appearance: For the Petitioner/Appellant(s) : In person. For the Respondent(s) : Dr. N. Mozika, ASG with Ms. S. Rumthao, Adv. (For R 1) Mr. S. Jindal, Adv. (For R 26). i) Whether approved for reporting in Yes/No Law journals etc.: ii) Whether approved for publication in press: Yes/No JUDGMENT AND ORDER 1. The petitioner appearing in person is before this Court, seeking directions to command the respondents who are executives in the United 1 India Insurance Company, to adhere to the Financial Standing Order of 2014, which he alleges is being violated due to problems in the Company Software GCCore. The petitioner's case is basically on the ground that though, the respondent Company had published the Financial Standing Order, 2014, with regard to delegation of financial powers with the maximum financial limit prescribed therein, the same had been violated in its implementation due to the GCCore Software being used by the respondent Company for performing its business. It is the petitioner's case that though, he had informed the Authorities to remove the deviation of the Financial Standing Order in GCCore Software, the same has not been rectified, which has led him to approach this Court by way of this writ petition. 2. When the matter was taken up for consideration, the counsel for the respondents, Mr. S. Jindal, at the outset had raised questions on the maintainability of the writ petition, and as the question of maintainability on the facts of the case appears to be crucial, the same is being taken up as a preliminary issue. An affidavit questioning the maintainability has also been filed by the respondents to which a rejoinder has also been given by the petitioner. 3. The objections to the maintainability are on the following grounds: 2 (i) That the facts of the case nowhere pertain to any violation of the petitioner's fundamental or other rights by the respondents, and the only allegation is that the respondent does not follow its own Financial Standing Order, 2014, in its internal process which is being done through the Company Software GCCore. (ii) The Financial Standing Order, 2014, which is relied upon heavily by the petitioner has since been revised by Circular No. HO: FSO 201819, and is in the nature of instructions. FSO 2014 lacks any statutory flavour and cannot be considered as law under Article 13 of the Constitution of India, or even as Rules contemplated under the proviso of Article 309 of the Constitution. Thus, the issue is not maintainable to warrant exercise of powers under Article 226 by the High Court. (iii) FSO 2014 being in the nature of instructions, any violation by an employee can only lead to departmental proceedings, and no public law element is involved in the case to warrant any adjudication by the High Court. (iv) Petitioner has not alleged violation of any fundamental or other rights and the writ petition only contains a weak 3 contention that the alleged glitches in the GC Core Software is affecting a selected few departments in the respondent Insurance Company, and not other departments, as such, the allegations so raised relate to IT issues, and not at all connected with the violation of any fundamental rights. (v) By alleging that the said glitch in the GCCore Software affects just some departments and not others, disputed and highly technical questions of facts have been raised which cannot be adjudicated by this Court in a proceeding under Article 226 of the Constitution. (vi) The petitioner does not have locus standi to file this writ petition, as he is seeking to his espouse the cause of unnamed empl