Vexcel Upkram Private Limited through its proprietor Vinod Behl, S/o Late Ram Lal Behl, having its office at 1st floor, Samridhi Complex, South Office para, P.O. & P.S. Doranda, DistrictRanchi, State Jharkhand. ... ...Respondent/Respondent HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD For the Appellant : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : Mr. Krishna Murari, Advocate. C.A.V on 12.07.2022 Pronounced on 17/11/2022 Per Sujit Narayan Prasad, J.: The instant intracourt appeal under Clause 10 of the Letters Patent has been preferred against order/judgment dated 6th December, 2021 passed by learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P. (C) No. 5957 of 2014 whereby and whereunder the writ petition was dismissed refusing to interfere with order dated 14th July, 2014 passed by the Jharkhand Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council (hereinafter referred to as 2 'Council'), holding the writ petition not maintainable on the ground of availability of statutory remedy as provided under the provisions of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006 (hereinafter referred to as 'MSMED Act, 2006'). 2. The brief facts of the case, which are required to be enumerated, read as under: The respondent was engaged in the work of meter reading/surveillance, computerized data logging, and preparation of consumer bill of erstwhile Jharkhand State Electricity Board vide work Order No. 61 dated 30.09.2002 for the period from 01.10.2002 to 30.09.2004, which was extended by the competent authority from time to time upto 31.12.2010. The respondent after execution of the said work submitted claim before the Council for principal outstanding amount of Rs. 1,13,29,630/ and interest amounting to Rs. 1,09,03,255/ against the petitionercompany under the provisions of MSMED Act, 2006. The proceeding commenced and finally the Council, after hearing the parties, passed the award dated 14th July, 2014 in Case No. JHMSEFC 03 of 2012, by which, the petitioner was directed to pay alleged principal outstanding amount inclusive of security deposit/performance guarantee/ incentive claim and due amount of Service Tax along with 3 interest at the rate of three times of bank rate of Reserve Bank of India and further to pay compound interest with monthly interest from the date of amount due for payment to the appellant till final payment is made under Section 16 of the MSMED Act, 2006. The writ petitioner being aggrieved with the award preferred the writ petition being W.P. (C) No. 5957 of 2014. The learned Single Judge, taking into consideration the fact of availability of statutory remedy, dismissed the writ petition with liberty to the petitioner to avail the legal remedies as available to it in law, which is the subject matter of present intracourt appeal. 3. The petitioner has preferred the instant intra court appeal mainly on the ground of declaration of award to be void ab initio which cannot be said to be an award as per the provisions of MSMED Act, 2006 reason being that the composition of Jharkhand Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council was not in accordance with the statutory provisions as contained under Section 21 of the MSMED Act, 2006 since the award/order was signed by altogether eight members including Chairman. 4. Serious objection has been raised on behalf of respondent raising preliminary objection by filing Interlocutory Application being I.A. No. 5383 of 2022 taking the ground that the issue which is now being 4 raised for declaration of the award to be void ab initio has never been raised before