Bangalore District Court M/S Padmashree Enterprises vs Kalpa Electrical Pvt Ltd on 21 January, 2026 IN THE COURT OF LXXXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU. (CCH90) Present: Sri.K.M.RAJENDRA KUMAR., LLM, M.Phil, LXXXIX Addl.City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bengaluru. DATED THIS THE 21st DAY OF JANUARY 2026 Com.O.S.No.475/2024 PLAINTIFF : M/s.Padmashree Enterprises, DTDC Courier & Cargo Ltd., # 1244, Opp. Shell Petrol Pump, Magadi Main Road, Jaimuni Rao Circle, A.D.Halli, Bengaluru560 079, Rep.by Proprietor Sri.Srinivasamurthy, Email IDmurthysrinivasa [email protected] Phone No92414 32344. (By M/s.H.D.& Associates) V/s. DEFENDANT : Kalpa Electrical Pvt., Ltd., # 4413, P B 25 149, 3rd Main Road, Rajajinagar Industrial Town, Rajajinagar, Bengaluru560 010, Represented by Manager, Email ID accounts@kalpa electrikal.com /2/ Com.O.S.No.475/2024 Phone No08023303103/080 23356049. (By Sri.Krishnappa, Advocate) Date of Institution of suit : 28.03.2024 Nature of suit : Money Suit (suit on pronote, suit for declaration and possession suit for injunction, etc.,) Date of commencement of : 22.08.2024 recording of evidence Date of judgment : 21.01.2026 Total duration : Year/s Month/s Day/s 01 09 23 (K.M.RAJENDRA KUMAR) LXXXIX ADDL.CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU. (CCH90) JUDGMENT The plaintiff has filed this suit against the defendant praying the Court to pass a judgment and decree directing the defendant to pay a sum of ₹.5,01,799/ (Rupees Five Lakhs One Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety Nine Only) together with interest @ 12% to the plaintiff from the date of claim till its realization and for such other reliefs in the interest of justice and equity. /3/ Com.O.S.No.475/2024 The brief facts of the plaintiff's case are as under: 02. That, the plaintiff is a recognized franchise of DTDC courier service for delivery of parcels and has made a good name in delivery business through both domestic and international shipments. That, the said business is being undertaken by the plaintiff since several years. 03. That, having accepted the plaintiff as reputed franchise of DTDC, the defendant has utilized the services rendered by the plaintiff for shipment of its products since many years. 04. That, for having utilized the delivery services rendered by the plaintiff to the defendant, it has made certain payments against the invoices raised by the plaintiff for the delivery services rendered to for shipment of its products. 05. That, however the defendant has become a defaulter by not making the payment properly on time to the plaintiff and the same has fallen due to the plaintiff. /4/ Com.O.S.No.475/2024 06. That, though the plaintiff issued individual bills, the defendant did not always clear the amount as per the bills but sometimes used to clear two or three bills at once. That, however, the plaintiff brought to the notice of the defendant time and again about the pending bills which were yet to be cleared by them. Still the defendant neither paid the amount nor replied satisfactorily to the demands of payment made by the plaintiff. 07. That, in the process the defendant did not clear the dues and huge arrears of amount payable by the defendant started accumulating. That, in this process since July 2017, some of the bills have been kept in balance. That, however, the defendant continued giving orders to the plaintiff even though there was balance pending and the plaintiff undertook those orders from the defendant in good faith and belief that the defendant would clear the outstanding payments at the earliest. 08. That, a total 27 bills are pending as of today amounting to ₹.5,01,799/ which is due to the plaintiff by the defendant.