1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Vikash Kumar Mishra ... ... Opposite Parties For the Petitioner : Mr. Sunil Singh, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P. For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Amritanshu Singh, Advocate : Mr. Aditya Kumar Jha, Advocate Order No. 08 / Dated: 28th March, 2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for opposite party No. 2. This criminal revision application has been preferred by the petitioner against the order dated 30.05.2022 passed in Original Maintenance Case No. 235 of 2018 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro whereby and where under the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Bokaro has been pleased to allow only Rs.8,000/ per month as maintenance allowance instead of Rs.25,000/ as claimed by the petitioner in her petition preferred under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C. in Original Maintenance Case for grant of maintenance without taking into consideration the grounds taken therein. It has been jointly submitted on behalf of both the parties including the petitionerwife and the opposite party No. 2 that during the pendency of this criminal revision the matter was sent to the Mediation Centre, JHALSA, Ranchi for resolving the dispute amicably between the parties through the process of mediation. The report of the Mediation Centre has been received from JHALSA, Ranchi, which is available on record. From perusal of the report it is found that the matter has been resolved between both the parties and the terms and conditions have been set out in the settlement agreement dated 11.03.2023 between both the parties in presence of the Mediator. Cr. Revision No. 659 of 2022 2 The terms and conditions as set out in the settlement agreement dated 11.03.2023 are as under: eSa petitioner jk[kh dqekjh vkSj eSa Opposite party fodkl dqekj feJk oxSj fdlh nckc ds lkSgknZ;iw.kZ okrkoj.k esa Mediator Sri Bimal Kishore Sinha ds le{k% fuEufyf[kr foUnqvks ij vkilh le>kSrk djrs gS ; 1 ge nksuksa Mutual consent ds lkFk family Court esa Divorce petition nk;j djsaxAsa 2 eSa fodkl dqekj feJk ,d eq'r Hkj.k iks'k.k jkf'k ds :i esa ckjg yk[k :i;k (Rs 12,000,00/) nsus dks rS;kj gw¡ tks Bank Draft ds ek/;e ls rhu fdLrks esa jk[kh dqekjh dks Family Court ds ek/;e ls nh tk;sxhA izFke fdLr % ikWp ¼5½ yk[k :i;s Divorce petition nk;j djus ds le;A f}fr; fdLr % ikWp ¼5½ yk[k :i;s izFke frfFk ijA r`rh; fdLr % Mutual Divorce ds vkns'k dh frfFk ds fnuA eSa] jk[kh dqekjh mijksDr izLrko ij lger gw¡A iwjh jkf'k dh izkIrh ,oa Divorce ds i'pkr~ eSa Hkfo"; esa fdlh izdkj dk dksbZ nkok ;k dkuwuh dkjokbZ ugha d:¡xhA eSa ,d eq'r Hkj.k iks'k.k feyus ds ckn] ekfld Hkj.k iks'k.k gsrq U;k;ky; }kjk ds'k uEcj 235@19 esa ikfjr vkns'k dk dksbZ nkok 'ks'k ugha cpsxkA 3 eSa] fodkl dqekj feJk] jk[kh dqekjh mudk fuEufyf[kr tsojkr % (i) lksus dk ckyk& 2 ihl (ii) lksus dk gkj & 1 ihl rFkk dku dk 2 ihl (iii) lksus dk uFk & 1 ihl (iv) lksus dk vaxwBh & 1 ihl (v) ekax Vhdk & 1 ihl ¼pk¡nh ij lksus dk ikfyl½ (vi) pk¡nh dk ik;y & 2 ihl (vii) pk¡nh dk fcfN;kW & 2 ihl rFkk eq>s 'kknh ds migkj esa feyk lksus dk psu&1 ihl rFkk vaxwBh&1 ihl lHkh lkeku CJM Bokaro ds U;k;ky; esa py jgs eqdnek C.P. Case 749/18 esa U;k;ky; ds ek/;e ls jk[kh dqekjh dks izkIr djkdj jlhn izkIr dj yw¡xkA eSa jk[kh dqekjh mijksDr lHkh tsojkr dh izkIrh ds i'pkr~ fodkl dqekj feJk dks bldh izkIrh jlhn nwWxhA lkFk gh CP Case 749/18 dks okil ysuh dh U;k;ky; esa dkjokbZ d:WxhA blds vykok eSa viuh 'kknh esa nh xbZ vkSj dksbZ lkeku dh ekax ugha d:WxhA Mediator Bimal Kishore Sinha }kjk mijksDr vafdr 'krksZ dks i<+dj ,oa lqudj lgh ikdj ge nksuksa viuk&viuk gLrk{kj dj jgs gSaA