State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission M/S. Konark Pipe And Synthetics Pvt. Ltd vs Teh Orissa Industrial Infrastructure ... on 1 July, 2023 STATE CONSU M ER DISPUTES R EDRESSALCOM M ISSION,ODISHA,CUTTACK M/s Konark pipe & Synthetics pvt.Ltd., Represented through its Managing Director, Rabindra Kumar Mohapatra, Aged about 62 years, S/o Late Chaitanya CharanMohapatra, At B/9, Mancheswar lndustrial Estate, Bhubaneswar, At present residing at N3/12g, IRC Village, Nayapalli, Bhubaneswar, Dist Khorda Complainant Vrs. 1. The orissa lndustrial lnfrastructure Development corporation (lDCo),(A Govt. of odisha undertaking) Represented through its ChairmancumMD, IDCO Tower, Janpath, Bhubaneswar TS1 022, Dist Khordha 2. The Chief General Manager (MSME), tDCO, IDCO Tower, Janpath, Bhubaneswar T51022, Dist Khordha 3. The High Level Land Allotment Committee, IDCO, Represented thorough the Chief General Manager, (MSME), IDCO, IDCO Tower, Janpath, Bhubaneswar 751 022, Dist Khordha ... Opp.Parties For the complainant: M/s K.K.Jena & Associates For the Opp.Parties: M/s B.S.Rayaguru & Associates PRESENT: THE HON',BLE DR. JUSTTCE D.P.CHOUDHURy, pREStDENT, DR.P.K.PRUSTY, MEMBER AND I Mtss S.L.PATTNA|K, MEMBER l 2 DATED THE olstJULY, 2023 ORDER DR. D.P. CHOUDHURY, J., PRESIDENT The captioned comptaint is filed u/s 47(a) (ii) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 (hereinafter called the 'Act') seeking different accounts of relief including compensation of Rs.95,00,000/. FACTS 2. The factuat matrix leading to the case of the complainant is that he complainant being a Graduate Engineer in Plastic Technotogy in order to maintain his livelihood started business of production of plastic pipes. He being allured by the state Govt' policy under MSME applied to the oPs to allow Govt. land for the establishment of his unit. Accordingly, IDCO granted lease of factory shed No. B/9 comprising an area of 13500 sqft in Mancheswar lndustrial Estate on 22.5.1981 on payment of consideration of Rs.1,35,000/ by the complainant on incurring loan from Orissa State Financiat Corporation (in short OSFC)' Lease deed was executed on 30.7.2010' 3. lt is also alteged inter alia that on 2.2.1982 State Bank of lndia, Bhubaneswar has sanctioned sum of Rs'1'00 lacs towards working capital for production of PVC pipes manufacturing unit' \ 3 After registration of this unit the complainant found that the unit became seek and accordingly osFC sanctioned more money. While the matter stood thus, the comptainant found that for smooth conduct of inspection procedure the comptainant applied for allotment of 2.50 Ac. Land to the District lndustries Centre,(DlC), Bhubaneswar on 13.3.2011 vide Annexure 4 as additionat land. It is further alleged that the District Single Window Clearance Authority (DSWCA) allotted 2.50 Ac. of land for exposition of unit at Chhatabar lndustrial Estate in favour of the complainant and accordingly lDCo sanctioned said land on 29.s.2011. After allotment of land no action was taken for detivery of possession of such land to the complainant. 4. Complainant alleged inter alia that the IDCO allotted 3.00 Ac. of land on 21.12.2018 to M/s Wild Lotus Fashions pvt:Ltd at Chhatabar lndustrial Area and delivered possession. Simitarly, the OP allotted the land in the same Chhatabar lndustriat Area to M/s Jubliee Bottlers Pvt.Ltd. on 31 .1.2019 and also delivered the land on2.3.2019. lt is also alleged thatthe OP allotted land in the same area on 27.2.2019 to M/s Krishna Automobiles vide Plot No. 32t2 and also allotted land to M/s Tasco Motors on 27.2.2019 and all the lands were delivered by them. The allegation of the I 4 complainant is that in spite of his approval for 2.50 Ac. of land since 29.5.201, the said land was not delivered to him although other entrepreneurs as stated above were allotted land and delivered possession. Therefore, there is serious discrimination ad