Lok Sabha Debates Regarding Statement By An Honourable Member On The Debate Motion Of Thanks On ... on 10 February, 2021 Seventeenth Loksabha > Title: Regarding statement by an Honourable Member on the debate motion of thanks on President's Address with respect to the Judges. Notice of Question of Privelege HON. CHAIRPERSON : Now, P. P. Chaudhary, just mention about your notice. That is all. SHRI P. P. CHAUDHARY (PALI): Sir, I would take 23 minutes. I have moved a notice of breach of privilege of this House against Shrimati Mahua Moitra, hon. MP. While speaking on the Motion of Thanks on President’s Address, she has cast aspersions with respect to the conduct of Judges. …(Interruptions) HON. CHAIRPERSON : He is just mentioning. …(Interruptions) SHRI P. P. CHAUDHARY: It is with respect to the conduct of Judges. …(Interruptions) Now, the question is whether the conduct of the Judges can be discussed on the floor of this House or not. Kindly see. I would like to refer Article 121 of the Constitution of India. These are three lines. I would like to read: “No discussions shall take place in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge of the Supreme Court or of a High Court in the discharge of his duties.” Now, Sir, if we see the words of this Article, there are four ingredients and four expressions and the discussion is completely prohibited in Parliament with respect to the conduct of any Judge and no allegation can be levelled against the Judge, whether he is a sitting Judge or exJudge. It will make no difference so far as the wording of Article 121 is concerned. …(Interruptions) HON. CHAIRPERSON : Please address the Chair. …(Interruptions) SHRI P. P. CHAUDHARY: Sir, kindly permit me for a minute. So, discharge of duties includes both sitting as well as retired judges. There is no doubt that it is the right and privilege of the hon. Member to speak, but at the same time it is restricted by article 121 of the Constitution of India. If she speaks against the mandate of article 121 of the Constitution of India, then it will constitute a breach of privilege. So, she has conducted herself …(Interruptions) HON. CHAIRPERSON : You are only referring about the notice. SHRI P. P. CHAUDHARY: Sir, not only this, I understand that it has been expunged from the records but it will make no difference because she has categorically stated this and this statement was made by her deliberately. She has said that it should be shown in the Lok Sabha TV channel. So, she was not concerned about whether it will be expunged from the records or not. It is a case of breach of privilege. I would also like to state that the same thing is there on the Tweeter handle and also in You Yube channel. So, removal of the statement from the record of the Parliament will make no difference. HON. CHAIRPERSON: The notice is under the consideration of the hon. Speaker. SHRI P. P. CHAUDHARY: Sir, a breach has been committed. HON. CHAIRPERSON: The notice is under the consideration of the hon. Speaker and let it be. डॉ. निशिकांत दुबे (गोड्डा):सभापति महोदय,आपका धन्यवाद । सर, तृणमूल कांगेस के जो सांसद हैं, खास कर सौगत राय साहब,इनको सेलेक्टिव एमनीशिया है । डॉ. अमृत्य सेन को ये कोट करते हैं कि उन्होंने कहा कि माइग्रेंट लेबर को पैसा चला जाएगा, लेकिन वही अमृत्य सेन जब कहते हैं कि जीडीपी का कोई मतलब नहीं है,तो उसकी मॉक्री करते हैं । उसकी रिपोर्ट के बारे में भी बता देते । सभापति महोदय,मैं जो अभी खड़ा हुआ हॅूं, तृणमूल कांग्रेस की संसद सदस्या ने जो कहा,जो मिस्टर पी.पी. चौधरी ने बताया है, दो आर्टिकल हैं,आर्टिकल121 को उन्होंने कोट किया और आर्टिकल122को उन्होंने कोट नहीं किया । मुझे लगता है कि सर, आप आर्टिकल122को पढ़िए । दोनों के बीच में डिवीजन है । जैसे हम जज के बारे में कुछ नहीं बोल सकते हैं । उसी तरह से इस पार्लियामेंट के एमपी के बारे में या खास कर आप,जो अभी चेयर पर हैं, यदि कोई रूलिंग आपने दे दी, उसके बारे में भी कोर्ट में डिस्कशन नहीं हो सकता है । यही कॉन्सिटट्यूशनल प्रोविजन है,आर्टिकल121 और 22 इसके बाद तृणमूल कांगेस की एमपी ने जो बातें चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इण्डिया के लिए कहीं, भारतीय जनता पार्टी या इस सदन में कभी इस तरह की चर्चा नहीं हुई । सर,यदि आपको ध्यान हो तो सन् 1973 में तीन जजों को बायपास कर के मिस्टर …* को चीफ जस्टिस ऑफ इण्डिया बना दिया गया । हमने कभी भी, मैंने अटल जी, आडवाणी जी, चन्द्रशेखर जी, सोमनाथ चटर्जी जी के भाषणों को सुना है । किसी ने यह चर्चा नहीं की थी, क्योंकि प्रधान मंत्री ने यह काम किया था । हम प्राइम मिनिस्टर के ऊपर चर्चा कर सकते थे । इंदिर