Supreme Court of India Shoukat Hussain Guru vs State (Nct) Delhi & Anr on 14 May, 2008 Equivalent citations: AIR 2008 SUPREME COURT 2419, 2008 (6) SCC 776, 2008 AIR SCW 3688, 2008 (3) AIR JHAR R 394, 2008 (3) SCC(CRI) 137, 2008 (7) SCALE 525, (2008) 2 CURCRIR 450, (2008) 40 OCR 664, (2008) 7 SCALE 525, (2008) 3 DLT(CRL) 161, (2009) 64 ALLCRIC 789 1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CRIMINAL) NO. 106 OF 2007 Shaukat Hussain Guru ... Petitioner vs. State (NCT) Delhi & Anr. ... Respondents JUDGMENT P.P. NAOLEKAR, J: 1. Close to noon on 13.12.2001, five heavily armed persons entered the Parliament House Complex and inflicted heavy casualties on the security men on duty. In the gun battle which took place in the Parliament House Complex, the five terrorists who stormed the Complex were killed. Nine persons including eight security personnel and one gardener succumbed to the bullets of the terrorists and 16 persons including 13 security men received injuries. The Investigating Agency took up investigation which revealed possible involvement of the four accused persons, namely, Mohd. Afzal, Shaukat Hussain Guru, S.A.R. Gilani and Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan 2 Guru along with some other proclaimed offenders said to be the leaders of the banned organization known as JaisheMohammed. The four accused persons were charged of different offences. 2. The petitioner was charged under the following sections of the Prevention of Terrorism Act (POTA), the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Explosive Substances Act: i) Section 3(2) of POTA ii) Section 3(3) of POTA iii) Section 3(4) of POTA iv) Section 3(5) of POTA v) Section 4(b) of POTA vi) Section 121 of IPC vii) Section 121A of IPC viii) Section 122 of IPC ix) Section 302 read with 120B of IPC x) Section 307 read with 120B of IPC xi) Section 3 of Explosive Substances Act. 3. The accused persons were tried by the Designated Special Court on the charges framed. After the conclusion of the trial, the Designated Court convicted three accused, namely, Mohd. Afzal, Shaukat Hussain Guru and S.A.R. Gilani for the offences under Sections 121, 121A, 122, Section 120B read with Sections 302 and 307 read with Section 120B, IPC, subsections (2), (3) and (5) of Section 3 and Section 4(b), POTA and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act. Accused Nos. 1 and 2 were also convicted 3 under Sections 3(4), POTA. The other accused Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru was acquitted of all the charges except the one under Section 123, IPC. The other three accused were awarded the death sentence under Section 302 read with Section 120B, IPC and Section 3(2), POTA. They were also sentenced to life imprisonment on as many as eight counts under the provisions of IPC, POTA and the Explosive Substances Act in addition to varying amounts of fine. 4. The Designated Judge submitted the record of the case to the High Court of Delhi for confirmation of death sentence imposed on the three accused. Each of the four accused filed appeals against the verdict of the Designated Judge. The State also filed an appeal. The High Court dismissed the appeals of Mohd. Afzal and Shaukat Hussain Guru and confirmed the death sentence imposed on them, and allowed the appeal of the State in regard to sentence under Section 121, IPC and awarded them death sentence under that Section also. The High Court allowed the appeals of S.A.R. Gilani and Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru and acquitted them of all the charges. The judgment of the High Court gave rise to seven appeals two appeals preferred by Shaukat Hussain Guru and one appeal by Mohd. Afzal and four appeals preferred by the State/Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi against the acquittal of S.A.R. 4 Gilani and Navjot Sandhu alias Afsan Guru. The matter was heard by this Court and by its judgment dated 4th August, 2005 this Court dismissed the appeal filed by Mohd. Afzal and death sentence imposed upon him was confirmed. Appeal of the petitioner Shaukat Hussain Guru was partly allowed. He was convicted under Section 123, IPC and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment of 10 years and to pay a fine of Rs. 25,000/ and in default of payment of fi