Question: Which of the following details is specifically stated in WADC Art. 27.3 regarding "The decision rendered by the Anti-Doping Organization may"?
Options:
case determines the principle of "lex mitior" appropriately applies under the circumstances of the case. For these purposes, the retrospective periods in which prior violations can be considered for purposes of multiple violations under...
The decision rendered by the Anti-Doping Organization may be appealed pursuant to Article 13.2
to the language in order to refer to the organization's name, sport, section numbers, etc.):157 − Article 1 (Definition of Doping) − Article 2 (Anti-Doping Rule Violations) − Article 3 (Proof of Doping)
As an exception, however, when a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method has been removed from the Prohibited List, an Athlete or other Person currently serving a period of Ineligibility on account of the formerly Prohibited Substance...
Correct option number: 2
Explanation: WADC Art. 27.3: The decision rendered by the Anti-Doping Organization may be appealed pursuant to Article 13.2
Source: WADC Art. 27.3