Question: Which of the following details is specifically stated in WADC Art. 2.1.2 regarding "Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under"?
Options:
Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following
The burden shall be on the Athlete or other Person to establish that any association with an Athlete Support Person described in Articles 2.10.1.1 or 2.10.1.2 is not in a professional or sport-related capacity and/or that such...
analytical result reported by the laboratory and other information as required by the International Standard for Results Management, or, for anti -doping rule violations other than Article 2.1 or violation of Article 10.14.1, the rule...
Athletes or other Persons shall be responsible for knowing what constitutes an anti -doping rule violation and the substances and methods which have been included on the Prohibited List
Correct option number: 1
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.1.2: Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following
Source: WADC Art. 2.1.2