Question: Under WADC Art. 10.9.3.2, which additional detail fits the provision fragment "be calculated as if the additional violation were"?
Options:
anti-doping decisions rendered by Anti -Doping Organizations not described in Article 15.1.1 above.123
Amendments to the Code shall, after appropriate consultation, be approved by a two-thirds majority of the WADA Foundation Board including a majority of both the public sector and Olympic Movement members casting votes
be calculated as if the additional violation were a stand-alone first violation and this period of Ineligibility will be served consecutively, rather than concurrently, with the period of Ineligibility imposed for the first -noticed...
A decision by WADA not to grant an exemption may be appealed under Article 13.2.38
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.9.3.2: be calculated as if the additional violation were a stand-alone first violation and this period of Ineligibility will be served consecutively, rather than concurrently, with the period of Ineligibility imposed for the first -noticed...
Source: WADC Art. 10.9.3.2