Question: Which of the following details is specifically stated in WADC Art. 10.2.1.2 regarding "Where the Athlete cannot establish that the violation"?
Options:
All reductions under Article 10.6.1 are mutually exclusive and not cumulative
Specified Substances or Specified Methods For violations of Articles 2.1 or 2.2 that involve a Specified Substance or a Specified Method, the period of Ineligibility, subject to Articles 10.2.3 and 10.2.4, shall be two (2) years
Any Athlete or other Person seeking to challenge whether the conditions for such presumption have been met or to rebut this presumption of scientific validity shall, as a condition precedent to any such challenge,
Where the Athlete cannot establish that the violation was not intentional, but can establish how the Prohibited Substance entered their system or the Prohibited Method was Used and that the context of the ingestion or Use was unrelated...
Correct option number: 4
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.2.1.2: Where the Athlete cannot establish that the violation was not intentional, but can establish how the Prohibited Substance entered their system or the Prohibited Method was Used and that the context of the ingestion or Use was unrelated...
Source: WADC Art. 10.2.1.2