Question: Under WADC Art. 3.2.3, which additional detail fits the provision fragment "provisions listed below could reasonably have caused an"?
Options:
and/or d) the Athletes and Athlete Support Personnel affiliated to that country and/or to the National Olympic Committee and/or to the National
and sport, in fulfilling their respective roles and responsibilities under the Code
provisions listed below could reasonably have caused an anti -doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical Finding or whereabouts failure, then the Anti- Doping Organization shall have the burden to establish that such departure...
Specified Substances or Specified Methods Where the anti -doping rule violation involves a Specified Substance (other than a Substance of Abuse) or Specified Method, and the Athlete or other Person can establish No Significant Fault or...
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 3.2.3: provisions listed below could reasonably have caused an anti -doping rule violation based on an Adverse Analytical Finding or whereabouts failure, then the Anti- Doping Organization shall have the burden to establish that such departure...
Source: WADC Art. 3.2.3