Question: Which of the following details is specifically stated in WADC Art. 10.9.3.4 regarding "same ingestion or Use that resulted in the"?
Options:
If a Provisional Suspension is respected by the Athlete or other Person, then the Athlete or other Person shall receive a credit for such period of Provisional Suspension against any period of Ineligibility which may ultimately be imposed
Further, the same prohibition on employment or permitted participation shall apply to a Person who was not bound by the rules adopted pursuant to the Code, who has directly and intentionally engaged in conduct within the previous six...
Substances and non-Specified Methods. Article 10.2.2 addresses the period of Ineligibility for violations of Article s 2.1 or 2.2 involving Specified Substances or Specified Methods. Article 10.2.3 addresses the period of Ineligibility...
same ingestion or Use that resulted in the first anti-doping rule violation, the Athlete shall be deemed to have established they bear No Fault or Negligence for the second violation, and the second violation shall not be considered a...
Correct option number: 4
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.9.3.4: same ingestion or Use that resulted in the first anti-doping rule violation, the Athlete shall be deemed to have established they bear No Fault or Negligence for the second violation, and the second violation shall not be considered a...
Source: WADC Art. 10.9.3.4