Question: Which of the following details is specifically stated in WADC Art. 2.3 regarding "or failing to submit to Sample collection without"?
Options:
in their Samples. Accordingly, it is not necessary that intent, Fault, Negligence or knowing Use on the Athlete's part be demonstrated in order to establish an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1.7
WADA's Right to Take Possession of Samples and Data Notwithstanding Article 6.5, WADA may, in its sole discretion at any time, with or without prior notice, take physical possession of any Sample and related analytical data or...
or failing to submit to Sample collection without compelling justification after notification by a duly authorized Person.11
17 For purposes of Article 2.11 , retaliation, threatening and intimidation include an act taken against such Person either because the act lacks a good faith basis or is a disproportionate response.18
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.3: or failing to submit to Sample collection without compelling justification after notification by a duly authorized Person.11
Source: WADC Art. 2.3