Question: Under WADC Art. 10.2.1.1, which additional detail fits the provision fragment "Where the Athlete can establish how the Prohibited"?
Options:
and whether an adjustment is appropriate, shall be made by the Anti-Doping Organization whose Results Management led to the imposition of the initial period of Ineligibility. This decision may be appealed under Article 13. An Athlete or...
Where the Athlete can establish how the Prohibited Substance entered their system or the Prohibited Method was Used and that the violation was not intentional, the period of Ineligibility shall be two (2) years
violate their obligations under Article 21.2 where such violation would not otherwise constitute an anti-doping rule violation or violation of Article 10.14.1
other Anti-Doping Organization with authority to test the Athlete that wishes to conduct further analysis on a stored Sample may do so with the permission of the Anti-Doping Organization that initiated and directed Sample collection or...
Correct option number: 2
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.2.1.1: Where the Athlete can establish how the Prohibited Substance entered their system or the Prohibited Method was Used and that the violation was not intentional, the period of Ineligibility shall be two (2) years
Source: WADC Art. 10.2.1.1