Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 6.6?
Options:
Further Analysis of a Sample after it has been Reported as Negative or has Otherwise not Resulted in an Anti-Doping Rule Violation Charge After a laboratory has reported a Sample as negative, or the Sample has not otherwise resulted in an anti -doping rule...
As provided in Article 3.2, facts related to anti -doping rule violations, or violations of Article 10.14.1, may be established by any reliable means.
Laboratories at their own initiative and expense may analyze Samples for Prohibited Substances or Prohibited Methods not included on the standard Sample analysis menu, or as requested by the Anti -Doping Organization that initiated and directed Sample...
Research on Samples and Data Samples, related analytical data and Doping Control information may be used for anti-doping research purposes, although no Sample may be used without the Athlete's written consent where the research involves re-analysis of the...
Correct option number: 1
Explanation: WADC Art. 6.6: Further Analysis of a Sample after it has been Reported as Negative or has Otherwise not Resulted in an Anti-Doping Rule Violation Charge After a laboratory has reported a Sample as negative, or the Sample has not otherwise resulted in an anti -doping rule...
Source: WADC Art. 6.6