Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 3.2?
Options:
Departures from any other International Standard or other anti -doping rule or policy set forth in the Code or in an Anti -Doping Organization's rules shall not invalidate analytical results or other evidence of an anti -doping rule violation, and shall...
The facts established by a decision of a court or professional disciplinary tribunal of competent jurisdiction which is not the subject of a pending appeal shall be irrebuttable evidence against the Athlete or other Person to whom the decision pertained...
WADA-accredited laboratories, and other laboratories approved by WADA, are presumed to have conducted Sample analysis and custodial procedures in accordance with the International Standard for Laboratories.
Methods of Establishing Facts and Presumptions Facts related to anti-doping rule violations, or violations of Article 10.14.1 may be established by any reliable means, including admissions.20 The following rules of proof shall be applicable in doping cases
Correct option number: 4
Explanation: WADC Art. 3.2: Methods of Establishing Facts and Presumptions Facts related to anti-doping rule violations, or violations of Article 10.14.1 may be established by any reliable means, including admissions.20 The following rules of proof shall be applicable in doping cases
Source: WADC Art. 3.2