Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 10.1.1?
Options:
Elimination of the Period of Ineligibility where there is No Fault or Negligence If an Athlete or other Person establishes in an individual case that they bear No Fault or Negligence, then the otherwise applicable period of Ineligibility shall be eliminated.
If the Athlete establishes that they bear No Fault or Negligence for the violation, the Athlete's individual results in the other Competitions shall not be Disqualified, unless the Athlete's results in Competitions other than the Competition in which the...
If the ingestion, Use or Possession occurred In-Competition, and the Athlete can establish that the context of the ingestion, Use or Possession was unrelated to sport performance, then the period of Ineligibility shall be between six (6) months and two (2)...
Where the Athlete cannot establish that the violation was not intentional, but can establish how the Prohibited Substance entered their system or the Prohibited Method was Used and that the context of the ingestion or Use was unrelated to sport performance...
Correct option number: 2
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.1.1: If the Athlete establishes that they bear No Fault or Negligence for the violation, the Athlete's individual results in the other Competitions shall not be Disqualified, unless the Athlete's results in Competitions other than the Competition in which the...
Source: WADC Art. 10.1.1