Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 3.2.1?
Options:
The facts established by a decision of a court or professional disciplinary tribunal of competent jurisdiction which is not the subject of a pending appeal shall be irrebuttable evidence against the Athlete or other Person to whom the decision pertained...
WADA-accredited laboratories, and other laboratories approved by WADA, are presumed to have conducted Sample analysis and custodial procedures in accordance with the International Standard for Laboratories.
Analytical methods or Decision Limits approved by WADA after consultation within the relevant scientific community or which have been the subject of peer review are presumed to be scientifically valid.
Methods of Establishing Facts and Presumptions Facts related to anti-doping rule violations, or violations of Article 10.14.1 may be established by any reliable means, including admissions.20 The following rules of proof shall be applicable in doping cases
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 3.2.1: Analytical methods or Decision Limits approved by WADA after consultation within the relevant scientific community or which have been the subject of peer review are presumed to be scientifically valid.
Source: WADC Art. 3.2.1