Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 4.4.3.2?
Options:
The presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers, and/or the Use or Attempted Use , Possession or Administration or Attempted Administration of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method shall not be considered an anti-doping rule...
New Classes of Prohibited Substances or Prohibited Methods In the event WADA expands the Prohibited List by adding a new class of Prohibited Substances or Prohibited Methods in accordance with Article 4.1, WADA's Executive Committee shall determine whether...
WADA's determination that the Use of the substance or method violates the spirit of sport described in the introduction to the Code.
If the Athlete does not already have a Therapeutic Use Exemption granted by their National Anti-Doping Organization for the substance or method in question, the Athlete shall apply directly to the Athlete's International Federation for a Therapeutic Use...
Correct option number: 4
Explanation: WADC Art. 4.4.3.2: If the Athlete does not already have a Therapeutic Use Exemption granted by their National Anti-Doping Organization for the substance or method in question, the Athlete shall apply directly to the Athlete's International Federation for a Therapeutic Use...
Source: WADC Art. 4.4.3.2