Question: Which WADA rule most precisely matches the following clause: "Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in the Athlete's A Sample where the Athlete waives analysis of the B Sample and the..."?
Options:
WADC Art. 2.1.2
WADC Art. 2.10.1.2
WADC Art. 2.3
WADC Art. 2
Correct option number: 1
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.1.2: Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in the Athlete's A Sample where the Athlete waives analysis of the B Sample and the...
Source: WADC Art. 2.1.2