Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 3.2.2?
Options:
The hearing panel in a hearing on an anti-doping rule violation, or a violation of Article 10.14.1 may draw an inference adverse to the Athlete or other Person who is asserted to have committed an anti-doping rule violation, or a violation of Article...
WADA-accredited laboratories, and other laboratories approved by WADA, are presumed to have conducted Sample analysis and custodial procedures in accordance with the International Standard for Laboratories.
The facts established by a decision of a court or professional disciplinary tribunal of competent jurisdiction which is not the subject of a pending appeal shall be irrebuttable evidence against the Athlete or other Person to whom the decision pertained...
Burdens and Standards of Proof The Anti-Doping Organization shall have the burden of establishing that an anti -doping rule violation, or a violation of Article 10.14.1 has occurred.
Correct option number: 2
Explanation: WADC Art. 3.2.2: WADA-accredited laboratories, and other laboratories approved by WADA, are presumed to have conducted Sample analysis and custodial procedures in accordance with the International Standard for Laboratories.
Source: WADC Art. 3.2.2