Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 6.1?
Options:
Further Analysis of a Sample after it has been Reported as Negative or has Otherwise not Resulted in an Anti-Doping Rule Violation Charge After a laboratory has reported a Sample as negative, or the Sample has not otherwise resulted in an anti -doping rule...
As provided in Article 3.2, facts related to anti -doping rule violations, or violations of Article 10.14.1, may be established by any reliable means.
Use of Accredited, Approved Laboratories and Other Laboratories For purposes of directly establishing an Adverse Analytical Finding under Article 2.1, Samples shall be analyzed only in WADA-accredited laboratories or laboratories otherwise approved by WADA.
Split of A or B Sample Where WADA, an Anti-Doping Organization with Results Management authority and/or a WADA-accredited laboratory (with approval from WADA or the Anti-Doping Organization with Results Management authority) wishes to split an A or B...
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 6.1: Use of Accredited, Approved Laboratories and Other Laboratories For purposes of directly establishing an Adverse Analytical Finding under Article 2.1, Samples shall be analyzed only in WADA-accredited laboratories or laboratories otherwise approved by WADA.
Source: WADC Art. 6.1