Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 3.2.5?
Options:
Departures from any other International Standard or other anti -doping rule or policy set forth in the Code or in an Anti -Doping Organization's rules shall not invalidate analytical results or other evidence of an anti -doping rule violation, and shall...
Burdens and Standards of Proof The Anti-Doping Organization shall have the burden of establishing that an anti -doping rule violation, or a violation of Article 10.14.1 has occurred.
The facts established by a decision of a court or professional disciplinary tribunal of competent jurisdiction which is not the subject of a pending appeal shall be irrebuttable evidence against the Athlete or other Person to whom the decision pertained...
The hearing panel in a hearing on an anti-doping rule violation, or a violation of Article 10.14.1 may draw an inference adverse to the Athlete or other Person who is asserted to have committed an anti-doping rule violation, or a violation of Article...
Correct option number: 4
Explanation: WADC Art. 3.2.5: The hearing panel in a hearing on an anti-doping rule violation, or a violation of Article 10.14.1 may draw an inference adverse to the Athlete or other Person who is asserted to have committed an anti-doping rule violation, or a violation of Article...
Source: WADC Art. 3.2.5