Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 2.1.1?
Options:
Any act which threatens or seeks to intimidate another Person with the intent of discouraging the Person from the good-faith reporting of information that relates to an alleged anti-doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged...
It is the Athletes' personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters their bodies.
Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in the Athlete's A Sample where the Athlete waives analysis of the B Sample and the...
Whereabouts Failures by an Athlete Any combination of three missed tests and/or filing failures, as defined in the International Standard for Results Management, within a twelve-month period by an Athlete in a Registered Testing Pool.
Correct option number: 2
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.1.1: It is the Athletes' personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters their bodies.
Source: WADC Art. 2.1.1