Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 2.11.2?
Options:
Any act which threatens or seeks to intimidate another Person with the intent of discouraging the Person from the good-faith reporting of information that relates to an alleged anti-doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged...
Anti-Doping Rule Violations The purpose of Article 2 is to specify the circumstances and conduct which constitute anti-doping rule violations.
Retaliation against a Person who, in good faith, has provided evidence or information that relates to an alleged anti -doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged non- compliance with the Code to WADA, an Anti-Doping...
Excepting those substances for which a Decision Limit is specifically identified in the Prohibited List or a Technical Document , the presence of any reported quantity of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an Athlete's Sample shall...
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.11.2: Retaliation against a Person who, in good faith, has provided evidence or information that relates to an alleged anti -doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged non- compliance with the Code to WADA, an Anti-Doping...
Source: WADC Art. 2.11.2