Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 2.11.1?
Options:
Any act which threatens or seeks to intimidate another Person with the intent of discouraging the Person from the good-faith reporting of information that relates to an alleged anti-doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged...
The success or failure of the Use or Attempted Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is not material.
Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in the Athlete's A Sample where the Athlete waives analysis of the B Sample and the...
Retaliation against a Person who, in good faith, has provided evidence or information that relates to an alleged anti -doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged non- compliance with the Code to WADA, an Anti-Doping...
Correct option number: 1
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.11.1: Any act which threatens or seeks to intimidate another Person with the intent of discouraging the Person from the good-faith reporting of information that relates to an alleged anti-doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged...
Source: WADC Art. 2.11.1