Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 10.9.1.1?
Options:
For an Athlete or other Person's second anti-doping rule violation, the period of Ineligibility shall be the greater of: a) A six-month period of Ineligibility; or b) A period of Ineligibility in the range between: (i) the sum of the period of...
If the Anti-Doping Organization establishes that an Athlete or other Person committed an additional anti-doping rule violation prior to receiving the first notice of violation, and that the additional violation occurred twelve ( 12) months or more before...
Contaminated Source In cases where the Athlete or other Person can establish both No Significant Fault or Negligence and that the detected Prohibited Substance came from a Contaminated Source, then the period of Ineligibility shall be, at a minimum, a...
Delays Not Attributable to the Athlete or other Person Where there have been substantial delays in the hearing process or other aspects of Doping Control, and the Athlete or other Person can establish that such delays are not attributable to the Athlete or...
Correct option number: 1
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.9.1.1: For an Athlete or other Person's second anti-doping rule violation, the period of Ineligibility shall be the greater of: a) A six-month period of Ineligibility; or b) A period of Ineligibility in the range between: (i) the sum of the period of...
Source: WADC Art. 10.9.1.1