Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 10.2.1.2?
Options:
Multiple Anti-Doping Rule Violations during Ten-Year Period For purposes of Article 10.9, each anti -doping rule violation shall take place within the same ten-year period in order to be considered multiple violations.
For violations of Articles 2.3 or 2.5, the period of Ineligibility shall be four (4) years except: (i) in a case of failing to submit to Sample collection, if the Athlete can establish that the commission of the anti -doping rule violation was not...
Where the Athlete cannot establish that the violation was not intentional, but can establish how the Prohibited Substance entered their system or the Prohibited Method was Used and that the context of the ingestion or Use was unrelated to sport performance...
If an Athlete or other Person establishes in an individual case where Article 10.6.1 is not applicable, that they bear No Significant Fault or Negligence, then, subject to further reduction or elimination as provided in Article 10.7, the otherwise...
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.2.1.2: Where the Athlete cannot establish that the violation was not intentional, but can establish how the Prohibited Substance entered their system or the Prohibited Method was Used and that the context of the ingestion or Use was unrelated to sport performance...
Source: WADC Art. 10.2.1.2