Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 10.9.3.3?
Options:
Where the violation involves a non-Specified Substance or non-Specified Method, the period of Ineligibility shall be two (2) years if the Athlete or other Person can establish the violation was not intentional; three (3) years if the Athlete or other...
If the Anti-Doping Organization establishes that an Athlete or other Person committed a violation of Article 2.5 in connection with the Doping Control process for an underlying asserted anti-doping rule violation, the violation of Article 2.5 shall be...
Ineligibility for Presence, Use or Attempted Use or Possession of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method Article 10.2 provides the framework for determining the period of Ineligibility for violations of Articles 2.1 (Presence), 2.2 (Use or Attempted...
Other Valuable Information and Assistance in the Effort to Eliminate Doping in Sport An Anti-Doping Organization with Results Management authority for an anti-doping rule violation or violation of Article 10.14.1 may, prior to an appellate decision under...
Correct option number: 2
Explanation: WADC Art. 10.9.3.3: If the Anti-Doping Organization establishes that an Athlete or other Person committed a violation of Article 2.5 in connection with the Doping Control process for an underlying asserted anti-doping rule violation, the violation of Article 2.5 shall be...
Source: WADC Art. 10.9.3.3