Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 2.11?
Options:
Retaliation against a Person who, in good faith, has provided evidence or information that relates to an alleged anti -doping rule violation, an alleged violation of Article 10.14.1, or alleged non- compliance with the Code to WADA, an Anti-Doping...
Acts by an Athlete or Other Person to Discourage or Retaliate Against Reporting to Authorities Where such conduct does not otherwise constitute a violation of Article 2.5
Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in the Athlete's A Sample where the Athlete waives analysis of the B Sample and the...
Possession by an Athlete Support Person In-Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method, or Possession by an Athlete Support Person Out -of- Competition of any Prohibited Substance or any Prohibited Method which is prohibited...
Correct option number: 2
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.11: Acts by an Athlete or Other Person to Discourage or Retaliate Against Reporting to Authorities Where such conduct does not otherwise constitute a violation of Article 2.5
Source: WADC Art. 2.11