Question: Which statement best reflects WADC Art. 2.1.3?
Options:
Sufficient proof of an anti-doping rule violation under Article 2.1 is established by any of the following: presence of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in the Athlete's A Sample where the Athlete waives analysis of the B Sample and the...
The success or failure of the Use or Attempted Use of a Prohibited Substance or Prohibited Method is not material.
Excepting those substances for which a Decision Limit is specifically identified in the Prohibited List or a Technical Document , the presence of any reported quantity of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an Athlete's Sample shall...
It is the Athletes' personal duty to ensure that no Prohibited Substance enters their bodies and that no Prohibited Method is Used.
Correct option number: 3
Explanation: WADC Art. 2.1.3: Excepting those substances for which a Decision Limit is specifically identified in the Prohibited List or a Technical Document , the presence of any reported quantity of a Prohibited Substance or its Metabolites or Markers in an Athlete's Sample shall...
Source: WADC Art. 2.1.3