Reviews of professor Sara Rich

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Good natured person, but like other reviews have stated she does insert her own unwarranted political bias sometimes. Nothing in this class was too hard to understand or complete, just make sure you stay on top of the work. The final project is a bit tricky and confusing but she is very willing to help you.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Dr. Rich's class can be frustrating at times because there is a lot of unneeded work outside of class, but overall, was enjoyable. She is not really a tough grader, but will grade based on bias and her own opinion. But, she really will work well with you outside of class.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
she is very understanding, has great teaching style and is overall very educated and knows a lot about the topics she teaches. no exams

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Rich's course seemed very unstructured and a bit tedious at times. Some of the content information and lenses she choose for us to look at seemed very much based off of her own opinion. You need to work "above and beyond" to meet her standard and I found that much of my work didn't feel well done because of this weighing over my head.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I got so mad during this class that I wrote a letter to the dean about her. That mad. All we did was read and talk about the patriarchy. Don't get me wrong, take down the patriarchy, but for a low level honors class? Really? Just no. The readings were so heavy and long I got nothing out of them or the class.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Someone said they like her as a person, LMAO. I had her last semester. She was ok, but a character. Always had an attitude with students. If you didn't agree with her you were challenged. Which is good but to an extent. Debating on taking her again but be prepared for journaling. She isn't BAD. Take her & form ur own opinion. Go "above and beyond."

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Class materials are all online, but difficult to navigate. Prof. Rich included her own political biases into lectures and assignments when it was definitely not needed for a Psuedoscience class. Lectures were way too complex at times and hard to follow. No quizzes/tests for this class, but get ready to read and take notes.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She was okay. The journals weren't that bad, but most of the other work felt like busy work. The group project was super stressful, but we ended up with an A. I liked her as a person, but her teaching felt unorganized and there wasn't great instruction. If you do your work and have a good group, you should get an A though.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
She's boring and everything is presentation style, which if you hate public speaking, avoid her at all costs. Straight outta the textbook equals boring and redundant teaching style. Waste of 3 credits but mandatory for Honors kids.