Reviews of professor Anne Sebert Kuhlmann

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Kuhlmann is very qualified, but the lectures are painful. Its a slideshow every day, with random participation assignments- so you have to go to class, even if you could learn the same amount from the posted slides. Other reviews regarding extra credit are wrong, there has been none this semester. Not terrible, not great.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This class is partial by this professor and partially by a GA. All the GAs are bad. Super boring class. Large lecture where everything is basically common sense. Not bad as long as you do all the assignments.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I didn't personally enjoy this class. She was intelligent, and I'm sure she does good research. This class was just extremely disorganized, and she seemed to not really know what she was doing. The only reason I rated this as a hard class was because of the disorganization. The material was not too bad itself, but the structure of the tests were.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Her grading is weird and she is not very helpful.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Dr. Sebert Kuhlmann really knows what she's talking about, but unfortunately I never really wanted to listen because every single class was just her lecturing for an hour and 15 minutes straight. I also had health issues throughout the semester that effected my attendance grade and she was inaccessible outside of class. It was so frustrating

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
One of the worst professor Ive ever had! Her teaching is not good, she doesnt care about her student. She is a tough grader!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Awful teacher!!! Avoid at all costs

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I personally really liked this class. It's an easy A as long as you do every assignment by the rubric. Discussion was repetitive at times (lots of group work), but not too bad. Exams are very straight-forward as long as you study the powerpoints.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The lectures were lengthy but exams were based off PowerPoints (search/make quizlets). No book needed. Although the discussion section was tedious, it was good to gain interpersonal skills with group projects while still learning public health. It is a good idea to get ahead on the projects because they are due on Fridays at 5PM.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Got a 90 on the midterm without using the textbook. VERY boring lectures that not even half the class attended so she started offering 2pts of extra credit to people who showed up. Discussion sections seem useless because the activities are very simple. The end of the semester is insanely busy for an intro class. Not hard but annoying.