Reviews of professor Andrew Pereira

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Ive never met a fruit I didnt like and its not common to find one with an unpleasant personality but this one does not. You are given a group to work with the whole semester and in mine we would take turns in going to class and write everyones names that werent there on the group activity paper we did that day for extra credit.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I only showed up to the first class and for the tests because attendance wasn't mandatory and still got an A. He's a fine lecturer but spends too much time answering questions and over explaining. You can just study the textbooks and show up to tests and do fine. There's no group projects or writing assignments.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
His absence policy was absurd, many in the class have priorities outside of class and his policy was a lot to ask of people. Very unclear in grading criteria, we never knew what to expect on team quizzes. He was easily offended by random things and was far too personal. He had a tendency to invalidate peoples stories after asking people to share.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He often misunderstands students' questions, and when he does get it; his answers are unclear and he tends to confuse himself trying to answer. He gets personally offended by random things extremely easily, and lacks organization. He spends most of the time asking students about personal anecdotes instead of teaching the material. Steer clear.