Reviews of professor Anne Steinert

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The course was accelerated with a lot of reading, most of it engaging, however this course took a lot of time. Prof Steinert was knowledgable and provided thought provoking feedback. This was not a typical online class and required video discussion boards and a live video session per week. She will only help you if you put in the effort.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I usually have a robust academic performance, but not with professor Steinert. I thought I would get a nice survey of Cincinnati, but I was instead barraged by activism and bogus history. More importantly, Anne is in way over her head: project happy, meticulous grader, very unclear. Cares way more about her own research than teaching. Stay away!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. The final project is a 10-15 page paper with 40 sources. 40 SOURCES. I took this as a sophomore history major and this was WAY TOO MUCH WORK, especially because it was my first 3000-level class. The teacher knows that the people in the class are not ready for the work either and revels in students complaining about workload

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I thought the content would be interesting, it wasn't. We had reading every week ranging from 100 up to 300 pages in one week. There was other homework on top of that, plus three lectures a week. Overall, it had so much work it was unrealistic to get it all done. She also is not clear on anything. Do not take this class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
She one time compared LeBron James to a Gorilla and no I'm not even joking. One guy in the class raised his hand and said something and she immediately shut him down telling him to stop talking. She pretty much just yaps about how awful straight, white men are for 50 minutes per class and that's basically the whole class. Don't take the course.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Just be prepared for a ton of busy work and unnecessarily strict exams. It's a Gen Ed course but it's run like it's some capstone. You'll learn stuff, but the material honestly isn't worth the knowledge, look for a course more information-based and not pointless fill-in-the-blank type worksheets.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Wasnt bad, wasnt good. The discussion section was fun and we got to choose 2 out of 3 between a project, paper, or final exam which was nice.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Absolutely awful. She sympathizes with TERFs, she doesn't respect disabilities, she doesn't respond to emails, she gives very little information on what she expects from assignments. Avoid at all costs.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Prof. Steinert was relatively nice and very knowledgeable about her topic. The amount of reading you had to do was absurd. I'm a fourth year history major, and this was more reading than any previous class I'd had. Unrealistic expectations for college students, especially for those who took this class as an elective. Do not take her class.