Reviews of professor Dan Wack

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Even if one completes A work, receiving an A is near impossible. Grading aside, however, Dr. Wack provides ample, constructive feedback on your essays. Also, he is willing to make time to meet with you about your writing. He really sets you up for growth in academia. As a result of taking this course, my writing skills significantly improved.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
There is a lecture everyday with few opportunities for class discussion. The powerpoints are very boring. The homework is short but very dense reading. The class could be much more entertaining if the class was more relevant to current ethical debates. The tests are tricky but points can be made up.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I took philosophy of art, and he is a bit quirky, but in general, he is great with students and clears up any questions. He has a real passion for the topic. He is very flexible. Although his classes can be easy to pass(if you do the reading) an A takes extra effort. He's there to teach. If you like art take his classes take his classes.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Lots of readings and even more writing; it is one of the most challenging courses I've ever taken. That being said, it was well worth it. The readings were interesting, the lectures were engaging. If you are majoring in humanities you would be remiss not to take this course.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The most interesting lecture I've ever attended. Never seems like he is just reading from a textbook, and always has interesting thoughts expanding on what he wants you to initially learn. Lots of reading, but very interesting text. Take his classes! They are hard, but they are worth your time.