Reviews of professor Audrey Lew

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Terrible. Ta's are unhelpful and grading criteria is super strict. You could follow requirements for an A and end up with a B. None of the professors hold office hours so you need to either email them or talk after lab section. If you have class after lab you're out of luck. Content/material isn't hard, it's more so their expectations.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Taking her for Advanced neuro (N115A), SUPER NIT PICKY, TOUGH GRADER, Gives you very LIMITED time to take HARD midterm, confusing lectures, makes material MORE complicated, WILL NOT CURVE! She grades so harshly and deduct points for ridiculous things. Be aware!! Thank God she doesn't teach N115B.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Definitely a wild card. I had a good experience, she tests on her learning objectives and they're always answered well in her lectures. Really accommodating and has an asynchronous option for class that's very helpful, only final exam is closed notes and it's entirely MCQ format so it's not hard to score in definitely an easier GE option than most.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I personally loved this class. she gave the option where you can join the live lecture and participate in polleverywhere questions or you can do an asynchronous activity to make up for it. her quizzes were open note, 10qs w/30 mins to take it and it was multiple choice so not too difficult. we only had 1 project which was pretty easy

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Very knowledgable, but a little bit too much so. Explained material in backwards wonky ways that was confusing to people never exposed to material, luckily she was receptive to the class and made the second half of the class more bearable. If you're not a quick learner or someone who's willing to study a lot don't take

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I scored all full score for attendance, quizzes (close-book). Infographic drops me straight from A+ to B. Not that I didn't put work into this project, the rubrics is vague, without proper examples, and the grading is arbitrary and long-pass submission deadline. Also subtracts points from peer review. Required research outside of course materials.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The class in general was easy. You get graded for doing poll everywhere, project, quizzes, midterm & final. Her teaching was a bit confusing. I felt lost at times but it was manageable. Easy class but the professor in general was eh.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Lew is kind and accommodating to student needs. Tests are on the harder side: combination mc and frq; final is cumulative; tested only on material from the lecture and from journal readings, I didn't read the textbook at all. Make sure you memorize everything from the lecture and understand journal readings more than those discussed in class.