Reviews of professor Adrian Reetz

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is a good instructor, and he is not a faster talker. His office hour is extremely useful. Sometimes he makes some mistakes in lectures but are corrected usually without being reminded. He cares about students.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
New prof but still good, even though he makes mistakes since he is new to Racket. Humourous and fairly enjoyable lectures, though. He makes his own slides which cover the topics well, and the fact that he has to debug his code in class is actually helpful for looking for problems in your own code.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
He's a great prof. Funny in lecture, enthusiastic and clearly cares about teaching. I would want him again.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He spent most of the class making constant syntax errors during examples slowing down the class. The slow pace of the class combined with the lack of in depth explanation left little reason to attend class aside from iclickers. Your time would be better spent going to the tutorials with grad students that actually understand how to code in racket.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Good prof who clearly cares about his students. His lectures can be a little rough around the edges, but that can be expected for a new professor. Overall a good lecturer who can provide meaningful analogies.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Adrian makes things super easy to understand. Provides plenty of examples that illustrate the concept well. Funny.