Reviews of professor Tao Huan

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Dr. Huan is a solid choice for CHEM 210. Going into the class I was scared after reading these reviews, but he turned out to be a decent prof and definitely improved as the term progressed. Tests were closely related to what he explained in class and the problem sets he posted on canvas. He does have a strong accent when lecturing, though.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Tao Huan is a terrible lecturer, his English is not the best so that may be why. Don't expect to be able to grasp a full understanding of CHEM 210 from his lectures alone. On the upper hand, his exams were mostly just as superficial as my understanding of the course, which allowed me to pass. The mark I received was an overstatement of my knowledge

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Prof. Huan is probably so far the worst Chemistry professor that I have had the experience to interact. He simply disrespect student and let student feel stupid. Most of the time his teaching speed is too fast and he also has certain behavior that is not fully professional.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His writing is literally IMPOSSIBLE to read. He doesn't explain properly and at times doesn't even seem to be trying to do so. DO. NOT. TAKE. HIS. CLASS.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Very easy class & exams but I don't think that's enough to justify a positive review. Objectively speaking he's not a great prof. The lectures were DRY & the material was dense. Sometimes he got annoyed by student questions. He also contradicts himself about the exam format. Avoid if possible, although I think he is the only choice so good luck

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
While teaching an entire chapter of equilibriums, this guy never once used equilibrium arrowssometimes conceptually misleading. Lots of mistakes in his work (solving problems in lectures)  without the pre-made slides, the students would have never known he made mistakes. However the slides also have mistakes sometimes.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
completely disagree with the low ratings, but maybe because the format switched when online lectures started very receptive to student feedback (removed some unclear questions after midterms), finals and midterms were all MCQs, some problems required calculation but other answers could be found on lecture slides

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Huan wasn't all that great. He very often disregards complex concepts/things majority of the people don't remember as "high school stuff" and makes you feel sort of stupid. His lecture pace is all over the place, some time WAY too fast and the other times too slow. He did try his best and showed some cooperation towards students concerns.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Can't teach, he just reads the lecture slides. Also pretty disrespectful if students. Questions student asked got a reply of this is highschool/first year stuff, i'm surprised you guys don't know this. This is very easy, how come you don't know.