Reviews of professor Andriko Lozowy

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Some love, some hate. I get good grades and had a hard time with him. Felt like I was taking an English class

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Andriko is one of my favourite profs. He has two midterms and one final (non-cumulative). The exams are tested from almost everything that he covers on his powerpoints. Didn't use the textbook at all. Super friendly and engaging prof

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I really enjoyed this class at the start; I felt the midterm exams were straightforward and had no trick questions. However, many questions on the final were way too specific about very small details from the readings and I feel this is unfair. There was also only 1 hour to answer 67 questions, felt more like being tested on how fast you can write.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I expected to really like criminology however Dr. Lozowy made that hard. The content is straightforward and easy, but his tests are the complete opposite. Nothing you learn in class/notes is tested. He rather test on stupid niche facts that are absent in the notes such as the most stolen car in a specific year. Thumbs down to this professor.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Andriko is a good prof. The course is structured around reading articles, and that is what all midterms and the final are based on. The questions can be tricky, but as long as you have a good understanding of the articles, it shouldn't be too difficult to do well. All the interactions I've had with him were positive. He is quick to answer emails.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
This class was interesting and not content-heavy. I'm currently in my 4th year, and reading articles that are not "academic" was a breath of fresh air. Readings: Easy, simple, and interesting. Lectures: He attempts to make it less lecture heavy and more conversational. Assignments: 2 written, 1 Midterm, 1 Final OVERALL: 10/10 would take again!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I was skeptical to take this class because everything I read said his tests were unfair. Listening to his lectures was fine and as long as you closely read the articles assigned you should do relatively well. I wouldn't say this is an easy A course because some of the exam questions are tricky, but I think Andriko really cares about his students.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Not a fan. Called assignment informal but then graded contrary to that. On a crusade against grade inflation

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The midterms and final were basically a test of how well you could memorize the textbook. The slides and lectures were a copy of the textbook but with less information and if you didn't read and memorize the textbook you wouldn't do well. He's pretty nice but the class was boring and took a lot of reading.