Reviews of professor Karl Newell

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This class is so unecessarily hard. He's a ridiculously horrible teacher and he makes the tests really hard and complicated. The textbook is the only way to pass this class and even then, the tests are so hard the textbook still won't get you a decent grade. Do not take him. You will regret it.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
if you read the book and study the book you will do great. the test are 10 questions short answer and he asks questions from the readings. IF you read you will know the answer. You will not know it by just going to class more than likely, only because class is a bit boring. The test are not hard or unreasonable and they are curved.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This professor is not suited to teach. He rambles on and on during class and hardly touches the VERY SPECIFIC information needed for the test. His tests consist of 10 essay questions, that are asked in the most obsure and misleading language. You will not get a good score unless you rely on only the textbook to teach you everything for this course.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Hes really not that bad. Yes his lectures are boring, but if you can get a professor that teaches straight from the book since he practically helped write the book and had a huge portion on the invention of what Kinesiology is. I recommend going to his boring lecture because they actually help and you can get away with not reading the book.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Just a very bad teacher, very unhelpful and doesn't care for students. Tests are ridiculously difficult for no reason. He's assessible if you make an appointmet but offers you no help.