Reviews of professor Sonia Seeman

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
 The professor is very unhelpful and many of her lectures didn't correspond with what was actually being assigned in the class. She has long lectures that she will hold past time. We had multiple essays that felt like we were writing the same thing over and over. The papers are graded harshly and grading system is terrible. Little to no instruction

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Material interesting enough, but the class became irritating very quickly. So much pre-lecture work and reading, essay grading is harsh. This class is usually my heaviest workload and I'm a CNS student. Point deductions for attendance. Not worth it for a UGS. Really wanted to love this, and some days were great, but overall, draining, not flexible.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Her lectures just dragged on past the time of the class which I felt was really disrespectful to us as students who had classes after hers. She made us write multiple papers a week & read multiple articles/movies a week. Her papers were graded so hard and she never gave a strict rubric. This class was just weird & I hated every second of it.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I had to write more for this class than any other class at UT Austin, for a lower division UGS. She does not respect people's time and keeps everyone after class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
avoid this ugs. the professor requires you to attend lecture that are a waste of time. the 3 weekly assignments are time consuming/unrelated to topics. this class is paper heavy- even when sticking to the rubric exactly they find something to take off for. overall the papers feel repetitive and the topics are tedious and BS.