Reviews of professor Philip Pegan

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Pros: exams and quizzes are short, multiple choice or true/false. Cons: homework requires a lot of reading. Lecture before and after exams and quizzes (he likes to use every second of class time). This class is mostly based on his opinions, mixed with some ethics definitions. He is judgmental when you respond in class discussion.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Incredibly boring and will make you actually question wanting to go to class.  It was actually difficult to motivate myself to go sometimes.  Talks in circles. Isn't very clear.  Not engaging at all.  Topics are not interesting.  Lots of reading involved.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Very monotone voice. Not very engaging. Very boring material. Easy grader for papers. He's a stickler for AI use.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This class is extremely boring. He will talk from the time the class starts until the end and repeat the same points. He does not know how to keep the class engaged which is important especially for a philosophy course. I would NOT recommend. You will never want to come to class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His class is just another excuse for Neumann to slam religion down your throat. He is extremely bias and his exams are based on his religious beliefs. Don't know how he's been teaching at Neumann for so long with all the offensive things he says about certain group of people. Avoid taking if possible.