Reviews of professor chun Pan

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I dont think Ive seen enough to judge, but I think shes a decent professor, considering she is new. What really harms the class is the too-strong focus on theory, and the textbook (which does the same). The assignments are difficult, but only undoable if you are unable to think abstractly. All in all, shes ok compared to other Hunter stat profs

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She is a nice person but her lectures are really really noneffective. The powerpoints come straight from the textbook with little explanations and she speaks so low that it's impossible to hear what she's saying. Her tests are hard but she's a fair grader. 19-20% of the final grade comes from online homework assignment and the rest from 3 exams.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Take her with all costs. I think she really wants to be seen as tough grader but she didnt know that her professional standing will depending on student evaluation on her . Explanation is not clear and only copy the book integrally .She should know that we are not undergrad students . ��

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Prof just watched the class and judged everyone. Creeped everyone out by being there without any explanation and "observing". Not sure what Chun's presence contributed, but made thing weird.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She's tough, but really cares that you learn.  Get ready to work.  Hysterical, by the way.