Reviews of professor Sherry Harlacher

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Her quizzes and tests are full of typos and misspellings. Professor Harlacher should not teach any student, as this can lead to a significant misunderstanding of art history. As other students have stated, the majority of her information is "copied" from internet sources such as Khan Academy. Her quiz question and response make no logical sense.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She is very strict about deadlines and has made this class more difficult than it needs to be. She also did not give me the extra credit despite the fact that I met the requirements. Not recommended!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
This online class had a clear outline of dates/times and grading policies. Professor was super knowledgeable about art history, and although it is not easy to stay engaged with an online class, she sent out many helpful announcements and gave feedback on our packback discussion posts.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Zero tolerance for missing work unless documented. Very rigid about how to contact her and how she will not accept any late work. Staying on top of work is imperative. Difficult grader when it comes to writing assignments. There are 6-8 quizzes a week and reading to go along with it. No lectures just YouTube videos, articles, and readings.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Not too hard. The unfortunate thing is that you have to use Packback, which no one likes. That aside, seven modules, each module due every Friday. Modules include Playposit videos and a lecture. You can keep the lecture open during exams and quizlet is a big help. No Packback in Modules 1 or 7. Never emailed her so I can't comment on interactions.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Multiple quizzes per module but an easy A if you do the work. Would take again for a low level art credit.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I didn't care for this professor. They were very strict w/ attendance/deadlines. The homework was easy, you just read a textbook and then answered questions straight from the textbook. There is also a paper that was super annoying and confusing. The TA was also unhelpful and a harsh grader.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
The class wasn't hard, but she is very strict about deadlines. You need 100% or higher to earn an A+. Everything is learned through other people's videos, so other than grading, she doesn't really do anything.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Don't expect help if you reach out

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Expect to complete two modules every week that contain 4 tests on the book chapter, numerous articles & many videos. Very time consuming and hard to keep up with especially when taking other classes. Makes you use an AI to help you write a large research essay, AI which was incredibly glitchy and wouldn't recognize scholarly journals as "credible".

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Pack back is annoying to use and is more busy work to do on top of the 8 quizzes you're going to be doing weekly.