Reviews of professor Jitendra Kumar

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Getting veey low grade that because the lucture talking about thing and his homework also exams talking about other thing.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I understand that he was a last minute replacement and it sucks for everyone about the situation. It was clear he was used to teaching upper-level engineering courses rather than general courses for everyone else. He made you solve problems on the board in front of 80+ students for a participation grade, which sucked. Exams copied practiced ones.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I had him as a stand-in prof for CHM 123. There was a communication barrier and he sometimes did not know what he was doing. He often goes back on his word. Overall he is very nice and cares about his students.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He was a last-minute replacement for our original professor. It's obvious this is his first time teaching chem and he's not really good, I taught myself everything. He is a good guy and he's caring, but teaching just isn't for him. He often made topics difficult, and his handwriting was bad, also Aleks homework was too much.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He is nice guy and his field is researching in battery. If you work hard out of class you will get good knowledge and grades. Unfortunately at the end of the semester he gave extra credit for few peaple which was unfair.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
His solid state battery course is easy and straight forward. He encourages students to ask questions. If you're into batteries, then you have a new best friend. He's good at teaching, be prepared to take notes when he speaks. Homework is every class, but it's sub 5 minute work. I'm guessing the students below me skipped class, which he doesn't like

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Don't take a chem class with him. He's an engineer and it shows-- not cut out for teaching chem. He's also combative when students ask questions about curves, and refused to curve the final, unlike every other prof in the department. Will ridicule you in front of the class for incorrect answers. This is for CHM 123, an introductory class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This guy was a last minute fill in and he cannot properly teach chemistry to save his life. Towards the end of the course he was was like "this was the first time I did work with chemistry since 1998". I would've skipped lectures and watched chem YT vids instead, but he made attendance mandatory and didn't allow us to use computers during lectures

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I took him for CHM 123; he is clearly not a chemistry teacher. He didn't really know how to teach in a larger lecture hall setting. It was very difficult to pay attention to his lectures because he didn't make good use of the slideshow presentations, his handwriting wasn't particularly good, and his accent. However, he is a very caring individual.