Reviews of professor Andrew Knoll

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Knoll was just okay. The readings were so long it was hard to actually grasp each concept and he graded kinda tough. The most annoying thing was that he barely answered emails and it was hard to connect with him outside class. Overall you'll probably do good but its just boring and annoying.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof Knoll is pretty nice and funny. He's kind of hard to understand if you don't have previous knowledge on philosophy. He's passionate but lectures can be boring & slow. Not too many assignments but make sure to put a lot of thought into them because he grades kind of tough.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I really like professor Knoll's energy and personality. He's very easy to talk to and makes aesthetics really fun! I enjoy philosophy so I enjoy the different theories and philosophical thinking. You do have to think a bit deeper and read a lot of articles overall but if you like philosophy or art, then you'll be fine. The class is super easy!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof Knoll is literally the sweetest guy ever! He cares about your success and is always ready for a philosophical debate. He is great at answering questions too. The lectures get a bit boring at times and some of the weekly readings are SUPER long, so be ready to put a good chunk of time into this class. We really only had 1 assignment a week:)

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He is passionate about philosophy. However, I didn't learn much in the class, just strengthened my critical thinking skills. His lectures are pretty redundant and sometimes boring unless you like philosophy. As long as you attend class and provide evidence for your arguments, you will do just fine. I didn't even do any of the readings.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This course was very straightforward and was pretty easy to follow each week. There is a group project throughout the semester, readings, and videos each week that you have to comment on. I would say I learned a pretty good amount of material from this course and didn't mind it overall. It wasn't the most exciting but Andrew does his best.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Andrew was pretty decent overall. The course material itself was easy. It was a bit hard to prepare for exams though, since it was not very clear what we would need to know. The lectures can be boring, and things took forever to be graded. But overall, still pretty decent and an acceptable professor to take.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Nice guy but lectures can be a bit boring I am not an ethics person so it's likely because of that. Assignments are easy but I felt ill-prepared for the open note midterm. He doesn't have online notes so the only thing I had were in-class notes which I didn't feel like they gave me enough to score well on the midterm. Could offer more online info