Reviews of professor Jamie Wallace

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Does not effectively give information in a clear way, nor does he effectively communicate what may be on tests. Does not encourage class discussion. Tests on topics he does not teach or give a video for. would not recommend unless you want to hate your psych class

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I liked Jamie's class. There was a lot expected out of a 100 level, so do be prepared for heavy exams. I thought his exams were straight forward, but there were times he added questions with difficult wording. You have to know your stuff to do well.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Overall a wonderful professor. He would always tell us what to expect for the midterms and would even go in depth for important notes. His tests and exam was easy as long as you listen to his lectures.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Ratings are pretty mixed. Jamie was a goof prof. He was accessible outside of class and gave good feedback on the research project. Lectures were detailed and explained things well. He encouraged critical thinking.  Rereading past comments on him, it seems like he has improved.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
professor let us know best times to contact him, suggested review on certain subjects, encouraged discussions, diplomatic, easy going manners, followed his course outline, utilized lecture times as scheduled, knew topic material very well and when conversations went off grid, he would acknowledge he was not too informed in certain areas

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Jamie is structured, honest, and thorough. Despite the Spring semester being condensed (and considering his own schedule) he always made time for an active student. His lectures are packed, but he is happy to further breakdown a concept either inside or outside of class. He wants you to succeed. He is a solid prof, can't recommend him enough!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He is honestly an ok professor. He gives good examples and explains topics well, and helps you when needed. Only downside I saw was sometimes he tends to ramble and add lots of stories which can cut class time but overall solid choice.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He is the best prof so far. I would definitely recommend him for the intro level classes. He truly deserves more points than it is there. You have to be attentive in class and that's it, you will ace it. He follows simple way of marking, if you could convey the answer to a uneducated person clearly, you will get 100 on the tests. The best one!!!!!!

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I am not in psychology, but after taking psyc 101 I thought it was something I would enjoy so I took psyc 102, so far I regret my decision. His lectures are so incredibly boring, it's hard to pay attention. He is a very tough grader, if you forget ONE word in a definition the entire answer is wrong. 1 quiz, 2 midterms, and 1final. I don't recommend