Reviews of professor Danielle Langford

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Easily the worst professor I have had at NCC.There are only 4 grades in the entire class and she grades super hard for a 2 credit class.I didn't miss a single class and participated at least once everyday and still got a 44/50 idk how she could even grade participation bc she never learned names.The test asked about the most irrelevant details.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Langford is a great person who wants to spread positivity. I learned good life lessons in her class, but I did not really learn anything related to the class. She cold calls on students and does not move onto another student if you do not know the answer. So if you have social anxiety, I really do not recommend her class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The material you are graded on has no match with the material taught in class. The 1 test that she gave out was stolen from an online test bank. The paper and the presentation have no instruction given and you are graded to a high standard. On top of all this she was 3-5 minutes late every day for a "Professional Development" class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I took Professional Development w/ Professor Langford, ironically she was not professional in teaching this class, she was 3-5 minutes to class daily. She also seemed unprepared, most lectures consisted of her reading word for word from the book or slideshow. I wouldn't recommend taking this course as it is only 2 credits and I did not learn much.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Everyone hates her but tbh she's not bad. She isn't good so she's OK. She has lectures that go over the same topic sometimes and grades the 1 paper that she assigns pretty sternly. You have to read a lot and have weekly discussion board prompts that are pretty simple to do. Do the work (which isn't THAT bad for being in college) and you can get a B

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I took Professor Langford for SBEN220 and it was a pretty fun class. I'm not sure how other students rated her in bad ways, but I thought she was really fun. Yes half of the questions on the exam didn't match what she would talk about and she'd follow the book with every single class, but she was a very fun teacher. Participation is HUGE for her.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Overall, her teaching ability is very poor. She enjoys talking about herself more than teaching material. She does not respond to emails and did not answer my questions regarding the test. Her grading style is very bias so if you do not meet her liking, your grade will suffer. Get ready to teach yourself from the book, as her lectures do not help.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
- I liked the ideas about self-advocacy
- conversational-type class
- reading wasn't too bad
- non-traditional lectures, were interesting
- easy tests
- roll call every class, attendance mandatory
- weekly discussion boards - tiring, wish she would post them earlier in the week
- love her sense of fashion