Reviews of professor Mohammad Roghanizad

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I haven't been in this class for too long but so far he seems alright, teaches right off the slides, explains the concepts rather than what is in the specific slide. He himself is good, but the course load itself is kinda boring unless you are interested in stuff like personal relations and how to get employees to work better.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Hundreds of slides, 300+/midterm and 400+/final. There is 2 midterms and 1 final. Also, there is no outline on what to study, so you have to study everything. The tests can consist of situational questions and selecting the best answer. I studied and focused in class, and still had a very difficult time in receiving not great - ordinary results.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I took his class at Ryerson and he is quite boring. He also often makes some pretty bad mistakes in the course material. This being said the class was fairly easy. Don't take him if you want a super engaging experience.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Took his course at RU. Assigns weekly group case studies and makes us do participation quizzes at the end of his lectures. We've had to dispute his answers multiple times. Weekly chapter + notes + case studies will take up about 4-8 hours in one sitting. His lectures are useless if you've read the chapters. TAs were brutal on the exam.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
All he does is talk about his presentation for 3 hours straight, and they have around 100+ slides each. Then he expects you to study them all for the midterms and exam, while he doesn't even give you an outline or practice exam or anything besides just the chapters to study. It was a hard course with a lot of studying and memorization.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Just reads off slides for 3 hours, course should only be necessary if you going in HR and even then this course is trash. Prof is okay, does try to be entertaining, but his test are expecting way too much. I would be fine with memorizing 1000 useless defintion but he doesnt do that, instead its situational questions where you pick the "best answer"

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The prof does his best to engage the class and is very approachable but the contents itself are dry. Attend class to take down notes of the videos/movie he discusses for short-answer questions. Otherwise, you need to memorize all the slide contents for the MCQs. For extra reading use textbooks if you want. An exam outline would've helped prepare.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Took this class at RU. His TAs go on power trips as most of the class did poorly on the midterm and exam. The highest grade for our midterm was below 90%, this should say something. Our in-class participation grades arent even true participation. You only get the mark if you get the MC questions right, which requires additional reading.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He's a nice professor but gives an incredible amount of workload that will easily take up 3-4 hours of your week. His midterm was difficult, to say the least, and he wasn't exactly an easy marker.