Reviews of professor Nick Siekirk

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
A phenomenal professor, you can tell he is working to help the students understands. Some quizzes and a few exams, final was cumulative, there was also a practical final. Lectures were usually based off of him writing notes on the board. Tests are tough but fair, not going to get tested on things we didn't learn in lecture.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Extremely passionate about both his field & teaching students.  However, there is just a massive communication barrier.  I feel like we we're talking different languages sometimes.  Needlessly complicates things that could be explained in way simpler terms.  EXTREMELY hard grader and feedback will be difficult to interpret.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Siekirk is easily one of my favorite professors at Georgia Southern. He finds ways to engage the class in the material he teaches, keeping it fun and entertaining. During this time, COVID, he has created a fun and educational classroom using tophat. If you prefer to sit in the back of classroom disengaged, this isn't the teacher for you.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Posted a million lectures for each section, even if you wanted to watch them, you probably wouldn't be able to find them because the online set up is very confusing. The quizzes were unnecessarily complicated. No tests except for the final which is also unnecessarily hard. A great person individually, I just think this is a hard subject online.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is a really good professor IN CLASS. His lectures are extremely long and he doesnt wait for you to finish writing the notes that hes showing. He makes class fun. Outside of class? Extremely hard grader. Easy to email and clear things up but such a hard grader that you could fail the class because of 2 assignments. Good prof but hard grader

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Do not take this this class , he is the most sarcastic, unprofessional professor i had. He does not explain assignments .

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His ways of grading assignments were very tough and his lectures are all over the place. He would call out students among other things that a normal professor would not do. would not recommend him, I was lucky to have passed.