Reviews of professor Greg Bavington

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
This course is disappointingly poor. Considerably lecture heavy, 45% of the grade coming from quizzes, a mid-term and a final exam. Read the transcripts because exam questions are verbatim/require regurgitation. Much delays in communication. It's too bad there's minimal practical application involved in this course.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This course is disappointingly poor. delays in communication.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The worst prof I have had at Queen's and would venture to say one of the worst teachers I have had in my life. Makes no effort to connect with students, nor help them when issues arise. Delegates his work to his TA's and puts minimal effort into classes. His lectures are unorganized and his rubrics for assignments are vague and unclear.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Poorly taught. The professor's online video lectures recorded made no sense. He is not succinct at all, and has to preface everything with random analogies that do not make sense. The TAs are tough markers and want everything done a certain way, and do not understand ingenuity or innovation.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Trust me DO NOT take this course. He doesnt listen. His course is poorly organized and his T.A.s are ridiculous.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Please do not ever take a course with this guy, especially online. He organizes (or DISORGANIZES) his online learning platform in a way that makes it impossible to find course material. For example, he didn't teach a specific exam concept & then claimed it was in an online lecture. He frequently changes deadlines & makes it overall hard to follow.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Nearly impossible to contact anyone for this course. There is no direct email for the prof and his helpers are not helpful at all. There are two major assignments worth 60% and the midterm material is all over the place. Overall not a super tough course, but not enjoyable