Reviews of professor Jill MacIntyre Witt

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Very passionate about the work she has done. Rambles a lot and gives a lot of statistics, you don't know what you'll actually be quizzed on. Brings up her TED talk or book at least once per class. Hard to take the class easily. Students will ask questions in class and she has no information to answer the questions and just asks if anyone knows.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She's not very organized, switches back and forth between slides, moves too fast during lectures, and is kind of rude. Don't bother raising your hand unless she asks for questions. She doesn't take feedback too well either. She consistently has questions on the exams that get answered incorrectly every quarter, and should really just remove them.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Very chill class. Easy to pass and you dont have to come to every single one, if you hit up on a week you'll be fine. Pay attention to the syllabus.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Do not take this class for a GUR. Prof is consistently unprepared, disorganized, and vain. Most interesting classes were the ones with guest speakers. The class relies on in-class assignments to force attendance, you cannot skip if you want a good grade.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Her lectures are unorganized, hard to follow, and she goes through fast. She often grades exams wrong making you think you did better than you actually did until she changes it. Dont bother raising your hand if you have questions because she either wont see it or give you a condescending comment and wont answer your question.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Jill obviously cares about her students, and will be flexible on due dates if some people are stressed (she does daily mental health check-ins). She gives you all the help you need for a good grade and has great feedback. Only downside is she gets sidetracked a lot which can take away time for assignments, as this is a project based class.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
ENVS 202 is a decent class. I took it online so there was a lot of reading and watching of videos (a couple were +1hr). Other than that weekly writing assignments and short papers. Study for the quizzes though, they aren't a breeze but if you read notes or paid attention at all you should be fine.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Since this class was all online, it was super easy. All of the quizzes are open note and you can often look up the right answers. The class is fine overall, super doable.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Not a nice professor that doesn't give help when you ask. We simply had to turn a journal of readings/ videos/ lecture once a week, however, Jill has managed to make this assignment as confusing as possible. Horrible format, horrible teacher.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Graded on 3 tests plus occasional extra credit points if you show up to class. Lectures were very hard to sit through as she is very disorganized and includes many arbitrary topics in her spiels. 
Professor was rude to her students and you can definitely expect to be called out if you leave mid-lecture in a class of 400.