Reviews of professor Truman Peyote

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
At first Professor Peyote was really good, but as time went on his "feedback" went from helpful to just plain out mean. It's almost as if he does not know that his students have feelings? He gave me suggestions to make my final essay better, but when I took them he gave me a 1/3 for my final draft. That brought me down from a 94% to an 83%.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Grading makes 0 sense and neither do the rubrics. I even had the help of my partner, a published writer for this course and we couldn't make any sense of it at all. Really disappointed that a 100 level course has this discouraging.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I did not enjoy this class. I am a logical, scientific person and Professor Peyote is very much a "free spirit." I don't feel this English class really helped me prepare for future English classes.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Prof. Truman makes you think outside the box in your writing. He is willing to put the time to help you as long as you put the effort.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He does his best, but I think that his feedback makes you feel incapable at times. He doesn't have to sugarcoat it, but it's not constructive criticism...it's just criticism.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He clearly states that the specifics of the class are set up by the college, not him. He tries to help improve your writing, not simply give positive comments. If you need some positivity, get a friend. This is a "workshop" style of class which means that you need to do the work. If you read the assignment prompts and rubrics, and you will do well.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This was my first class with ASU online, so I was confused by the course shell, but he was very understanding and helpful. I found the course content boring but useful. Personally, Professor Peyote himself is very kind and engaging. He gives specific feedback so that it's easy to know exactly what to improve and how to do it for future assignments.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The grading criteria made absolutely zero sense. I had my partner, a published author, help me extensively with this course and even he did rather poorly on the assignments. The feedback was confusing and the rubrics were not followed.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Every assignment is out of three points so if any mistakes occur from his perceptive your grade is suddenly brought to either a 66% or 33% (or 0%). Don't bother trying to learn from your mistakes as the """"feedback""" he gives is just rude comments. He may as well draw a little angry face when you put something he doesn't like. TA is nice though!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Peyote tries really hard to get you to think out of the box. At first it was a headache, however he was able to help guide me to the subject for the term's paper. 
You have to write 3 or so papers in total, a lot of discussion boards, and all the papers are focused on one specific subject of your choice.