Reviews of professor Rachel Hooper

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
tries to make class engaging, she has worksheets we do every class for a grade, but you do them as a class. tests are multiple choice.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Prof. Hooper is a very sweet lady and teaches in a very easily understandable way. I was unsure about this class because she is a new teacher and i'm not interested in art history, but her classes were much more engaging than my past lectures, and the assignments were easy.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Hooper is a great professor if you are wanting to become an art history major. She is lecture heavy and they are not engaging. Her PowerPoint slides are only pictures while she explains them, which is hard to make up a class. She also does not give long breaks. Her midterm and final are 3 in class essays but you are allowed to have open notes.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Great prof. You write 4 research essays every 2 weeks, but they're relatively simple to do. You don't need to read or pay attention in class, but only if you have the textbook to search stuff up for the quizzes/essays (rent the ebook).1 quarter-long group project, most work has to be done out of class but will give feedback before you turn it in.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Hooper understands that everyone has to take these art classes and tries to make the lectures more about synthesizing information rather than about how "cool" the art history is, so I respect that. But at the end of the day it's art history. If you like it you'll love this class, if you don't you'll hate it. Hooper is a great teacher though

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I thought she was super nice! We had a big discussion post every two weeks, and a big, quarter-long project due at the end of the quarter. Open note and textbook tests. Field trip at the end of the quarter to the SCAD MOA. I would definitely recommend her class!