Reviews of professor Claire Rocks

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I guess she was added to the module to improve it after an awful first term but it has just shown up how bad both lecturers are with using technology. The worst part is that when you have a simple question and it still takes weeks to get the answer. If we say anything about it then the blame is on us for having any expectations.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Good lecturer with interesting content

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I have not enjoyed the module and dont feel like Ive gained anything apart from a collection of random pictures and unrelated ideas. Not what I expected or how I think it was described to us.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I thought the module would be hard because of the all the maths in robotics but there is almost none of it it that is actually examined. The exam questions seem to be the same every year. I am not convinced the organisers understand what they are teaching because everything complex is skipped or done between lectures. Pretty terrible but easy.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Randomly marked coursework. Randomly marked exam. Random responses to questions that don't answer the question you asked. Personal tutor careers help that boils down to "Ask Anna" but "Ask Anna" means you get beaten for jobs by anyone who asked any of the good academics for help. Switch tutors if you can and only take for random and pretend help.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
the online pre-recorded course just be her reading the slides, even without emotions. she may not even know what is on the slide, just reading and turning pages.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
The lecture and labs were trivially easy. The coursework is arbitrary with no way to do well without just doing lip service to the labs. Labs were copied from someone else. Feedback is slow.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I struggle to get through lectures because they are just bullet point slides being read out loud and the occasional piece of busy work about how we feel. I have not learnt anything that is not immediately obvious. I think D&T GCSEs are more technical. The labs are literally taken straight from a textbook with a few extra words.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I waited almost four weeks for a reply to a simple question and then I got pushed away to someone else. I do not know how students are supposed to be well when the person in charge of it takes weeks to not even reply.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
The coursework was ridiculously marked. The labs were basically just playing around with kit until the last week when we got told that we had to have everything working or we would get a bad mark. The coursework report just made that worse. A terrible module unless you are one of the people who is liked.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Out of 20 lectures we only actually had 12. The labs were straight out of a book. We got 10% for attendance marks. I found it extremely easy but very boring as a module.