Reviews of professor Daniel Urban

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Great teacher, obviously very knowledgeable in his field. He expects a lot out of his students and if you are unfamiliar with the material you will have to apply yourself to pass. Very hard tests, very lecture heavy. Take notes, study hard, do the reading, and you'll probably do well. He's very accommodating but will not put up with any BS.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
If I wanted Marxist Indoctrination, I'd just scroll through Twitter for 10 minutes. He does get points for his enthusiastic indoctrination and fair grading despite my disagreements, and core concepts were explained objectively. His video lectures could have been condensed. He also closed the course early so I couldn't access individual grades.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He does not follow his syllabus he created himself. The first exam the class just took was a 77question multiple choice and about 15 essay questions. I know a handful of students who did not even have enough time to finish. His text was beyond ridiculous. I read the book and understood it, then his lectures just confused me. He get off topic alog.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He's a good teacher that knows what he's talking about. He put efforts in his teachings and grades, although sometimes he thinks like an economist too much, very rational and impersonal. Extra sensitive students will have a high chance of being offended. I suggests before taking his class, have a conversation first, don't judge him only from webs.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He takes over 3 weeks to get tests back, didn't even see our first test before we took our second one. And they are hard tests, expect to study a lot. Lectures way too fast and too long, he may know his information but he can't simple it down for new econ students. Could not read half of what he put on whiteboard. Class felt really disorganized.