Reviews of professor Diana Figueredo

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This class is just okay. Lots of reading, boring lectures, and overall filler work. Be prepared to read a lot of articles and be asked to discuss them in depth. Overall felt like I was being taught social studies, not learning how to teach it.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I was often so confused in class. She made everything political as well. I couldn't dare say my opinion because I know I would get a bad grade. I wish she could put these ratings into consideration. She is nice, sometimes, but this class just feels like a routine to her, and she doesn't actually care. I couldn't name 5 important things I learned.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Her lectures were very confusing.  There seemed to be no content in them making them very hard to follow.  Her expectations for assignments were not clear and was known to doc points for no reason.  Overall I was not impressed and frustrated a lot during the semester.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Many of these reviews extremely harsh As a former student, I find it concerning that future educators would display such disrespect. I've seen the disrespect outside and inside her classroom. The professor provides clear expectations.This course is no different from other college-level expectations. Very upsetting these are our future educators.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
PART 2: attendance
She also neglected to EVER email me back. The only reason I discovered this was her policy was due to my grade dropping from an A to a D (where it remains) is because of Canvas. Her syllabus does not outline this attendance policy. BEWARE apparently this an EDUC wide policy. If you get sick, a family member dies, too bad ig. :/

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
EDIT: will upload true thought when semester is over.