Reviews of professor Andriko Lozowy

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Tests were 54 MC & 2 WR in 1 hr & had small, specific details from long readings instead of the main ideas. Entire course was reading articles & 2 movies (added when people complained). Never taught & did discussions on the readings that didnt cover what would be tested. I studied way too much for a 200 lvl course & didn't get anything out of it

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Anyone talking bad about Andriko must be thinking of the wrong professor, Super nice, always has interesting perspectives in lectures. Gives lots of cool points about topics and always looks deeper into things.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Ruined the whole subject for me. Picks on students and also has favourites. Racist and also insensitive which is ironic for a sociology professor.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Andriko was a very nice professor and very accommodating to students. However, his tests were quite unfair. The questions about the lectures were extremely easy, but the majority of the test were specific questions that no one would have thought to write down or were irrelevant. I studied WAY too much for these tests to only do poorly on them.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He made it easy to understand the information in class but tests were really hard. Definitely go over the textbook while studying as the slides are based on them. Plays a few videos and films that you will have to take notes on for tests. Overall the worst part of this class was the test questions.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
as someone who cant listen to someone talk for more then 2 minutes at a time, this man was a godsend. i could sit alone, read the material and do well and consistantly well on the exams, the odd time i listened to a lecture it was engaging and easy to follow, i would give him my arm if he asked.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This course features two midterms and a final, all closed book with a major focus on memorization. Exams, are demanding, with 1 hour for 2 written responses and 53 multiple-choice questions. A major challenge is memorizing specific quotes from readings, often different from those highlighted in lectures. This class was excessively challenging.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I found Andriko to be a really caring and approachable prof. While his teaching style differs from most classes I've taken, I feel I learned the most in his class. He assigns one or two readings per week, one class dedicated to reading time and the other to discussion of the readings. The exam questions were always straightforward and fair.