Reviews of professor Brent Archer

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I have never had a worse experience with a professor. I was accused of using AI and when I sent him proof of me not using it, he ghosted me for two weeks only for me to receive an email saying I violated conduct, and my grade remained a zero. He was very rude in prior emails and his syllabus a year old, so there was confusion with due dates.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Dr. Archer is a great guy. He does tend to impose his political views on students (I usually didn't agree with him, so this made him hard to listen to). Most times though, he was great and his lectures kept me entertained. We didn't have to go to class on test days. There were few assignments, so you have to do well on the tests, they aren't hard.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Dr Archer really wants students to succeed. He is very laid back and gets back to you when you email him within 24 hrs. I learned a huge amount about communication disorders from his course

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Professor Archer is very kind and an awesome instructor! You have weekly assignments and 3 exams. Our final was optional to take if you were comfortable with your 3 exam scores and you have a final assignment where you read a book and do a book report. It was fairly easy as long as you do the work! Overall a very interesting and easy class.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He had flex liens so everything was due at the end of the semester. Open book quizzes. Super caring

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Dr. Archer is mostly a good professor. He has a tendency to impose his political views on other students and sometimes forces them to believe something they may not agree with. Other than that, the weekly assignments are very easy and the exams were everything from the power points. Grading criteria is sometimes ambiguous and unclear.