Reviews of professor Yun Zhou

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Rather than lecturing, zhou tends to just mumble to himself at the front of the lecture hall. He does not provide the answers or solutions to his practice problems which makes it very challenging to know what you are doing right or wrong before the tests. The course seemed somewhat disorganized, although the material itself wasn't too challenging

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The professor makes extra effort to help students. Very timely responses to students inquiries. The classes and course materials are interesting.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Prof. Zhou was the best professor I've ever met so far. He is kind and he really cares about the quality of his classes, and whether students can understand the course content and learn from it. This course was easy and interesting, and it's easy to get an A if you attend the classes and do the practices in class.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Super nice guy, patient and caring guy. Textbook is not mandatory and he even posts the questions from the textbook so you dont have to buy the textbook to do the practice questions. I believe there is also two grading schemes and he chooses the highest of the two. One option includes participation and one does not.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Course content is not too difficult. Yun however does not offer value to students. Lectures consist of mumbling & over explanations of simple concepts resulting in long and extremely boring lectures. Textbook is not mandatory, practice problems are provided. Slides are designed for in class use & are not useful for independent study.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Came to class to be taught some kindergarten-level stuff, big waste of time for me. However, some of the concepts have clearly flown over some students heads, so I guess only in said scenario would it make sense to have this class as mandatory .

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
very nice guy. His explain of stuff is decent and his assignments are based off lecture slides/ practice problems and his exams are similar to assignments as well

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
a gem. enough said.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Professor was a nice guy but somehow found a way to make relatively straightforward content confusing through his poor slides and explanations.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Really nice professor, good at explaining concepts, really helpful slides and good practice questions.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
nice prof. If you review the materials he provide and go to the lectures, you will definitely get a high mark for this course. The exams are fair enough.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
super helpful and gives clear explanations