Reviews of professor Evangelos Lympouridis

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
A good introductory course for those who want to get into the field of AR&VR and game development. The professor is very knowledgeable in the space and is always willing to help out students. This is a project-based course and you have access to the lab's equipment to create anything you want. Super fun course and highly recommended!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Lympouridis is a well respected individual in the VR industry, and great with his students in the classroom. His class required that we work on a semester long project. He gave constructive feedback and helpful tips while still letting us have creative freedom and not impeding upon that. He's very encouraging. I highly recommend him.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He has good knowledge of the course and industry, always there to help and go the extra mile so that students can learn and develop PROFESSIONAL applications

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Vangelis was a thesis adviser on my MFA thesis for USC Games, and also a key adviser on an MFA project for USC Animation. He was key to the success of both projects, a rare combination of a great engineering mentor as well as a great creative adviser. His feedback is tough and honest, but always lead our work to achieve the best result. Thanks V!

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
CSCI538 is great class that give students opportunity to build amazing AR/VR application by their own. Evan have decent knowledge on AR/VR technology and industry and will always give us inspiring feedback. I can definitely feel his passion on lecture. Taking this class give me a wonderful experience on learning how to build a VR application!

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
One of the best courses at USC. I explored gaming for the first time under Van and it has been one of my best decisions. He is very constructive with his feedback and explains all the gaming concepts with a lot of dedication. He has inspired my team and me a lot to give our best and work to achieve a really steep curve of learning.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Generally a good course. Nice people & strong support. However, course is inefficient. Lecture, seminar and discussion could be long and tedious. Too many groups that they don't have enough time to talk with everyone. Grade solely based on presentations. Worked very hard on project but got bad grade. Good for study but bad for GPA.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The course was centered around a group project that we had to work through the whole semester. Of all the group project courses I've had in the past, none of them came with the feedback system the professor provided in this course. Each week we met with him and the TAs, showed them what we had and got constructive feedback to work with. Great class