Reviews of professor Michael Cross

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Best professor ever. Funny and charismatic. Whoever doesn't get at least a B in his class didn't try and is probably unfit to be in school.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Had him for lab section of engineering. Positive attitude, but not very helpful at all. Students would ask questions and he would just tell them they should have read or they should already know, even if the question was ABOUT THE READING. Very, Very nitpicky grader, many points lost on lab reports for trivial nonsense. Lecture review pending.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Great professor. Anyone who complains about him just doesn't want to put the work in.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is very unhelpful and does not effectively teach the material in a way that is understandable and easy to load. This was a hybrid introduction to electrical engineering and he was stubborn about using the chalkboard to do notes with a low quality webcam. Only reason he got a 1 not a 0 is because he does care about how students well being.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Prof. Cross is one of the worst professors to get for an introduction class. He grades at a PHD level for introduction level students, making people quit engineering due to the unclear instruction. Prof. Cross will just say "read the prelab" if you have a question then disappear for 45 minutes then come back with a coffee. Interesting lectures.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
It was funny watching everyone else in class fail because they didn't prepare at all for the exams. If you put in the work, you will get at a minimum a B+.