Reviews of professor David Feiler

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Feiler was great. He was easy to keep up with and explained things well. The homework was moderate and the labs were fun. The exams were moderately difficult but some were open note so it made it easier.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Feiler wasn't a bad professor! He was monotone which made it difficult at times to focus since I have ADHD. He was easily accessible if you had any questions. Exams are a huge portion of grade so beware and study for them. No extra credit, but he will drop your lowest lab and homework scores! Honestly, my class is what made it fun.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Feiler is great, and our entire class got along well too. The exams are very similar to practice exams and you can use a notecard. Be prepared tests are a big part of the grade. Final was open note and online, and there was a study session before. I never used the textbook either, just the lecture slides. Go to office hours for questions.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He was an alright professor at first but as we got into the more difficult subjects, he didn't really teach them that well. This is a class that for sure you should be able to pass with an A but will you efficiently learn? Not really. The exams sometimes covered things he hadn't taught yet too. I found it difficult to focus in class.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He taught pretty well and helped out during labs. He was a little monotone, but it shouldn't interrupt your learning. My only issue was the grade is defined by a few tests and since I got a C on one test an A's on the rest I ended up with a B. Tests aren't too hard and you can have a note card, but underestimate them and you might pay for it.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
David Feiler had pretty boring lectures, and went over simple concepts for too long in comparison to more difficult ones. While I received my grade in my class, I have not received ANY lab feedback throughout the entire course. Part of the labs were graded via a multiple choice answer on canvas. I am pretty sure he just gave everyone 100 on labs.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He curves exams, grades labs nice, and the tests are usually pretty easy. One thing to watch out for is that he does speak monotone, which could be difficult for some people. Personally, I just did lecture slides and homework on my own. If you are dual enrollment, take him if you are willing to teach yourself a little bit and put in work.