Reviews of professor Nicholas Bedard

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Bedard is decent at explaining things and is willing to provide extra help if you take some initiative. Some exam questions require you to think a little bit outside the box but if you truly understand the material these questions are highly doable. If you care you'll do well. Class average is a 65 which makes no sense.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Avoid to prevent a miserable life. He does not even do the examples correctly in class and most of them are straight from the textbook. What he teaches has little correlation to the textbook and he only gives 1-2 examples of the material that he teaches. I'm studying for my midterm rn and I have no idea what I am supposed to review.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor gets confused by his own questions when demonstrating them in class many times. Midterms and final not worded the best and multiple spelling issues were present. Can often explain things in a confusing way and in general, sometimes the answers to questions in the course did not line up with research and proof from sources found online.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Just had Prof. Bedard for Econ 2150 at Western. I found that though he teaches the content well enough for someone to understand, his lack of teaching experience shows in his lectures. He often confuses himself after writing on the board and has to recollect himself to confirm that what he wrote was correct. His exams were fair, given the content.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
ATTN: UWO students

Prof bedard tries to be a good prof but struggled to answer questions and occasionally is "lost" during his own lectures

exams have few questions and some questions test concepts never taught nor in the textbook 

lectures arent useful so get ready to self learn the whole course.