Reviews of professor Emily Dumler-Winckler

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
A lot of papers, a lot of useless readings. She goes off topic and then ends it with "you know what I mean." as the class sits silently and confused. She attempts for the discussions to be more complex than most first-year students are ready for.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She is not as bad as what the reviews say, but she isn't great either. The readings are very biased towards left-wing beliefs, we were even forced to go to a pro-choice forum. The final paper is also really difficult. Everything else is 3/5 difficult. She does give good feedback for papers, that is her biggest strength.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I would guess I have had about 100 teachers in my lifetime. She is definitely the worst out of all of them. She does not care about her students. The readings are ridiculously long and honestly make little to no sense. This is not THEO, it is a course that Emily set up for students to learn exactly what she wants them to. Slu needs to fire her

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Very unclear on her feedback. You wont know your grade until the end of the semester (as in youll have no idea where you stand) so theres no way to improve. A is very doable but also seems like she assigns grades randomly.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Terrible. Just don't take her. If she doesn't agree with your point of view you will get a C or D, regardless of how good your argument is. Comments on papers are also just rude.