Reviews of professor Chinwendu Enyioha

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Chinwendu is possibly the worst professor within the ECE department from a teaching perspective. Lectures are unclear, exams are difficult (when's the last time you solved a 3rd order polynomial when the roots aren't 1 or 0), and the homework takes a significant amount of time. Fortunately for him, ECE doesn't care if you can teach, just bring in $

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Nice professor, super smart and friendly but tough grader. He just assumes you can catch up really fast his concepts.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I am in EEL5173.
5173 requires LOTS of extra reading and work outside the class.
If you don't read and proof, you failed. Choose this course carefully!
Course will only gave the hints and further extensions, make sure you read the book!
Even change another instructor, this course is still hard, cause it has so many math-language.
Be Wise!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Very nice man. Very bad professor. Not a very good teacher. Seems to know his stuff, but cannot articulate it to a class in an effective manner. There are quizzes throughout the semester. (We had one or two surprise extra credit quizzes). Gives no practical knowledge. It is more like a math course than an EE course. Take someone else.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Dr. Chinwendu has very good conceptual and theoretical knowledge in LCS. It seems like his knowledge comes from a pure math background because zero practical knowledge is discussed in class. Be ready to talk a lot of about MatLab but never actually learn how to use it practically. Do no take this professor unless you are a math major and are R2R.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
His lectures are good, gives A LOT of extra credit bc his exams are a bit difficult. He does expect you to study the material before coming to class. But it is an interesting class and he does a great job teaching it.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
My complaints about him exceed the word count for a review, but here are the two main ones:
Makes us buy a textbook so we can do homework then bases his lectures off a completely different textbook.
Constantly references classes that we aren't required to take (and also have not taken) and refuses to explain the material in a way we can understand.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Unclear instructions. Tests and quizzes do not reflect lectures, homework, or reviews. Very difficult tests and quizzes. Take someone else.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
lack of general guidance with a lot of material feeling as if it was not finish being taught. Felt as if there was no real structure. I recommend not to take this professor under any circumstances

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
LCS was pretty straightforward. Lectures were ok, and clear. A couple of times, he made algebra errors when trying to solve a random example he generated on the fly. Going to class and studying the Nise text is helpful. Homework problems tended to come from there. Apparently, he believes students earn their grades, so he gives extra credit to help.