Reviews of professor Daniel Bacaner

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This professor is the worst ever he didn't even teach anything in class he talk for an hour about essay like what is a introduction. Which we already know and something about him irritate you. You can't even use the phone in his class when you do he will look at you with his mock face.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
This professor is by far the worst one i have come in contact with. He talks about the same thing class after class and then expects you to write essays about something that makes absolutely no sense. Provides no prompts AT ALL. Talks about random things the whole class. Once you speak your mind he begins giving you lower grades.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He literally repeats the same thing all over again on each class. Also, his spelling and grammar is not good. At all. The classes were boring. I love English, and I LOVE writing all types of technical papers, but this class made me question everything. I did not enjoy it at all.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This professor was all over the place with his lectures. It was very hard to follow him and understand what he was trying to say. He was not very good at explaining what he wantesd from us and worksheets were always so repetitive. Although he gave chances to earn extra points. Attendace taken every class and will affect grade if you do not come.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Professor Bacaner is great! I dont understand what all the bad reviews are about. His lectures are very engaging and always connect back to the bigger picture. He rarely assigns textbook readings or homework. Hes a pretty easy grader when it comes to essays, and doesnt penalize for absences. I would 100% recommend this class.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Unlike most, I really enjoy this professor. Sure he may not give out a lot of 100s, but that is because he looks for quality over quantity and expects only the best from his students. This class does require a lot of critical thinking and its best to go into the class with a meta cognitive perspective since he doesnt want any bias in the essays.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
LITERALLY talked about randomness for each class for a whole hour, almost like he was adding on to everything as he went through the class he didn't even relate it to anything or the assignments. Nothing he said was of significance and i was bored out of my mind, I'd skip every class and just do the essays online except attendance was a grade.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He is an awful professor, the whole lecture is just gibberish. He doesn't even know what he's talking about, and won't answer a simple question even if asked multiple times. He gives his students no encouragement to even come back to class. He makes Composition the worst class ever took. I wouldn't advise selecting him as a professor at all.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Would take this professor again. He only cares about thickness