Reviews of professor Stuart Glosser

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
not a fan at all. i took the AP version in high school and it was better than this. what he talks about doesn't add up with the textbook (he makes up names for things that are not referred to by that anywhere else). the lectures not fantastic and he doesn't wear a microphone. no practice questions, no warning for quizzes/hw. would not recommend.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Below average prof. He knows his stuff but cannot express himself well enough. Doesn't seem to care for his students. Hard to reach outside of class. Do not recommend.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof will have pop quizzes and give homework assignments during lectures, an then won't post about their existence on bright space so if you don't go to class you won't be able to hand them in. Reads off his slides and is not great at answering questions.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This prof assigns way too much work. The class was 6 weeks and there were constant assignments and quizzes that barely reflect what we learn in class. Its as if he doesnt prepare his lectures ahead of time because he just rambles. He is TERRIBLE at answering questions, and often it is unclear whether or not he is correctly solving the problems.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
The course is not well organized and is also very boring. It is mandatory to go to courses but the information that he gives students doesn't help them do the homework well or solve the quizzes. I had to study a lot on my own and going to courses was a waste of time.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Assignments are pretty easy but the midterm and final is very hard. the lectures are so boring. The feedback is not useful at all. Im sure he knows his stuff but very bad at explaining. If you are taking this as a elective to boost up your grade, AVOID! unless you are good at learining everything by your own with no help from the lectures.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
A great professor, always responded quickly to emails. I learned a lot from his lectures. Would often post news articles on lecture topics for discussion which was great for understanding the concepts. He encourages discussion and participation. There's participation marks and pop quizzes, so you must attend. Tricky exams but a fair grader.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This class made me cry. There were weekly quizzes, but they were barely related to what we'd covered in class. No matter how hard I tried to understand what he was explaining, I just could not get it. I emailed him a question, he told me to ask in class, but the explanation was rambling and left me googling the answer. I'm scared of my final grade.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I feel for him because a lot of students skip his lectures because they tend to be a bit monotone and not very engaging, but a lot of the stuff in his lectures causes more confusion and its very unclear.