Reviews of professor Matthew Webber

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
No study material at all. Take Sadaka's section plzzzzzzz. Make your life much easierrrrrr

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Matt tries his best, and always lets you out early which is nice, except that theres so much material you miss out on that if he just took a little more time to explain, it would make so much sense. You never know how youre doing in this class. HW isnt collected and quizzes dont get graded for weeks, so you never know if you actually understand

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He was a nice guy and clearly very smart, but was not great at explaining the concepts in an easier way. Also took way too long with grading the weekly quizzes and was very harsh. Homework is not mandatory but if you want to try to understand what's going on and do somewhat well, you have to do it.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Webber is a decent professor. His lectures do a nice job summarizing the content from class that week, which is really helpful with the homework.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Not the most interesting lecturer and usually takes twice the time he needs to in explanations. Tests and quizzes are quite easy if you're good at math, but final is difficult and very different from the other problems. I didn't bother showing up to class except quiz days and I still did well so take that how you will.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Loved him as a professor all year until the end and I already submitted a good TRACE eval for him. He filled the exam with time-waster problems (think 4+ triple-integrals), put the heaviest weighted q's on the last page, told us to fully evaluate them at the beginning, then laughed and said we didn't fully need to with 5 minutes left. No curve.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof. Webber gave us weekly quizzes that he would not grade until one of the big tests of the semester (of which there were two midterms and one final). This was incredibly frustrating, since I had no idea how well I was understanding the material. He's a good guy, but grading my midterm from two months ago right before the final was the worst.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I had Matt Webber for both 1151 and 1153. His lectures aren't very good because he glosses over stuff, but he's a lenient grader in ILS. Do the homework and read the textbook and you'll do fine

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
His lectures aren't super entertaining. He explains the main topics and gives examples, but the explanations are not in depth enough and I often had to read the textbook to teach myself some of the content.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He is a nice guy who makes an effort to help students outside of "class." He likes visuals and the graphical applications of math. The homework probs/lecture probs were not extremely similar to the quizzes, but you should still do those probs and it will give a good foundation for the quizzes. He is a reasonable grader.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Nothing is accessible except his PPT. NO STUDY MATERIAL AT ALL. AVOID AS BEST AS YOU CAN!!!!!