Reviews of professor David Warsinger

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His lectures are very derivation heavy and handwriting is poor, so I'm forced to read the book. But he's very friendly and cares about being a good teacher, so it kinda averages out.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Great person, sub-par teacher. He definitely cares about his students, but lectures are extremely unhelpful and are mainly definition- and theory-based, instead of going over examples.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
ME 315 is tough for a lot of people because it is naturally math heavy. Prof. does a great job of explaining the significance behind the math and real applications of how the theory is used. It is obvious that he spends a lot of time on his lectures and he is the only lecturer that does experiments in class. Also, reading the book is helpful.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
His handwriting is poor and he can be too quiet so it can be hard to follow the lectures. I would try to sit in the front of the class. Read the textbook. Review the hw for exams. He cares a lot about his students, is pretty funny, and knows what hes doing. But I cannot read his handwriting and hes disorganized.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
No doubt he's very intelligent, and also a nice guy, but he's just not good at teaching. Like at all. It's his first time teaching, but he's just so bad at it I doubt he'll get much better. I feel bad saying that cause he really is a nice person, and I think he wants to be good too, but he's just too terrible.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Awesome guy and really helpful but overall horrible teacher. He is not good at teaching. Obviously a very smart guy but teaching is something else.