Reviews of professor Margaret Werth

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This is an asynchronous class with weekly lectures, discussions and exit tickets. The exit tickets are quite literally impossible. A lot of the information that are on these exit tickets, were not presented in the lectures so we have to practically guess. I have spent hours at a time on these exams to never get above a 3/8.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I don't recommend taking this class if you are take it for credit. She has weekly tests and discussions and four 350 words papers a semeste. She pays too much attention on detail in her questions, and some of the answers I had to read a passage or watch videos over and over and find out that the mistake was just a detail of a word, which broke me.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
If you think taking async ARTH154 will be slight work, think again. I quite literally average a 50 on every singular quiz she gives. The quizzes are actually impossible, worth 6 points so one wrong is a B. Also Werth wants you to read about 40-80 pages of TEXTBOOK reading a week AND watch lectures AND do other papers or discussions on top of it.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Async, so the videos matter for the weekly quizzes, also had weekly discussion posts but it was ok to miss one or two. There were a bunch of videos to watch weekly. Four papers total, but they're not long at all and aren't hard. The occasional drawing was done but it doesn't have to be good.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The course has one weekly meeting and requires participation, but it was enjoyable to get creative when making arguments or analyzing pieces. The only downside was the amount of reading which was really heavy. She is a sweet woman and gives a lot of good feedback!

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Weekly quizzes does not test your understanding of the course material. You have to pay attention to useless details such as the name of a mountain to score.
The TA is very rude. She put a single "?" in the comment section and deducted almost 20 points because of the grammar of a sentence, while said nothing regarding the content of the paper.