Reviews of professor Anup Srivastava

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Anup is that he is so bad that you will have to read the whole textbook to have any idea what youre doing He spends like 90% of the lectures BRAGGING about how amazing he is(but hes not) he also enjoys teaching irrelevant material and practices that arent even used in Canada and then skips like 90 important things cause he "doesnt have time for it"

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Srivastava is a professor that you can tell excels in his field and has a firm grasp on the material he is supposed to be teaching. That being said, it does not translate to his instruction. He does not communicate the information in a very learnable way, and deviates from the text in order to teach broad scale, non-curriculum material.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Anup really cares about his students. Everyone knows what debit and credit means but he explains how numbers are interpreted and the meaning to every concept and formula. He explains in details and while a lot of students complain that he doesn't follow the course instructor's slides, his slides are way more informative and clear. Highly recommend!

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Anup is very caring towards his student and he does know what he's teaching but he teaches it poorly. He explains concepts that confuses students. Lectures were not useful. Sometimes he would talk about his achievements and teach topics that were not course material. He also does not teach off the pp slides. I learned this course through youtube.