Reviews of professor Karie Cherwin

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I do agree that at times this class can seem disorganized and the tests were hard. Overall the class topics were interesting and really enjoyed my TA Michael!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Lecture is disorganized and hard to follow, discussion is led by students, mandatory but not useful. Reviews were also useless. Lots of assignments but no rubrics and TAs are not on the same page with each other or the professor.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I took this class online in the Fall 2020 semester. I enjoyed the class, but was not a fan of Dr. Cherwin. The class was a complete copy & paste from the summer semester with no new content, which is meh but fine, but Dr. Cherwin also did not have any office hours and to email her you needed to email your TA first. She just seemed very disconnected

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She is not great at public speaking and seems to be reading straight off of her computer during lectures. Because of this, she flies through lectures, usually ends 20min early, leaving you to teach yourself the content w/ the slides posted online. She doesn't really answer questions either. She responds to emails pretty fast though, so that's nice

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I enjoyed Zoo 360 with her! She was easy to communicate with by email and provided a good breadth of knowledge on the subject. Since online, there were a mix of lectures and media content (podcasts & videos) which was fun and different. She had clear expectations and graded quickly. Sometimes canvas was a bit unorganized but was quickly resolved.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She does not respond to emails and there is no piazza so its virtually impossible to get in touch with her. Tests are very unclear on what you need to know

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Karie is a very nice woman, and her lectures were clear and easy to listen to. She posts the slides online so you don't really have to show up to lecture if you don't want to, though I'd recommend it. Overall the class was easy and Karie was chill.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof Cherwin was inaccessible and unclear about course standards. She was not clear in her expectations and rarely communicated them accurately to students and had even less communication with her TAs who often had received conflicting or out-of-date information. She was often behind on grading and most of the lectures were by guests.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
took last year and made material very inaccessible and was not willing to give the information if asked, or often made students jump through hoops. Only lectures for 1/3 or less of lectures, but seeing other professionals was a good experience. Tests were straight forward but no study guide was given.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Not the worst lecturer I've ever had, but the lecture sequence was incredibly disorganized and often lacked direction; the class is basically a myriad of guest lectures chopped into different "units." Content is easy though, and discussion is solely led by students which wasn't ideal. Tests were fair for the most part