Reviews of professor Scott Medling

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
His teaching style doesn't correlate with the quizzes however the lecture notes do if you read it over and over. The exams were far too long and the class average on the 2nd exam was a 37.5%. The homework is not like the quizzes, but he claims they help. Go to class only if you can't learn on your own.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Terrible professor. No logical thought process that can be followed in his teachings, no correlation between any of the components of his class like HW, tests, quizzes, lectures etc, unprepared for class, his lectures don't follow the prelectures from flipit, terrible at notes, unable to keep notes in his class because they are useless and irrelev

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He's a nice person, but his teaching skills are not very good. He writes on a chalkboard with a class of 100 people, so its hard to see what he's doing. He often times does not come prepared for class, and does not convey ideas clearly through examples.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He was not organized at all and it made the material very difficult to understand. I would also go to his office hours and he wouldn't even know how to properly explain how to get the answer to certain homework problems let alone not knowing how to do the problem in general.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
No professor has caused me more pain or mental distress than Scott Medling. While he, as a person, is quite friendly, his class is a confusing mess of concepts which he fails to properly convey to his students. Material covered in class is unrelated to homework, which is in turn unrelated to quizzes and tests. I was saved by curves. Steer clear.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Scott is easily the most inconsistent professor i have ever had. Quizzes dont line up with lectures or homework. The only success I ever had was from heavily studying the book, which he doesnt even reccomend. If you plan to take this class, plan on getting a subscription to Chegg.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Scott is a brilliant researcher and knows his stuff, but that doesn't make him to be a great or even good professor. His lectures don't match up with the HW, Quizzes or even Exams. The average for out class exams thus far is everyone failing. The exams are less of knowing the material and more did you get lucky and write out the formula you needed.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Doesnt care about students and always puts the blame on others for his mistakes. Terrible Professor.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Highly recommend taking "Uhther" professors.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Professor Medling isn't a great teacher at all. He spends half of the lecture on polls and his lectures don't correspond well with the exams and are not that descriptive. His exams are so much more difficult than they need to be. It's not just the questions being hard, it's the length he gives you to complete it, being 50 minutes. Needlessly hard.