Reviews of professor Rostyslav Kravchenko

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He is a very chill dude. This class is conceptually very easy, but he isn't the best lecturer. However, there is a charm to him. If you review the homework problems you got wrong and fully understand every problem, its a very easy A (tests were 80% but super simple). If you don't like math and just need this class for credit, don't take him.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures were fast and hard to follow. Most people were able to get the material better out of the textbook or online. Homework was challenging but graded leniently. Exams were easy if you actually understood the underlying concepts.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures can be difficult due to the professor having an accent that is sometimes hard to understand but if you ask him to clarify he will do so. Content structuring is quite poor but if you ask questions (in class or out of class) you can get by. Exams are easy if you do all the practice given to you and all the homeworks. Textbook is important.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
goes very fast during lecture and does not explain the concepts very clearly. better to watch the lectures online than going to class. not a lot of guidance or study material, just quest and written homework. straightforward class but wish it was better structured

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
The entire lecture is completely unrelated to what you will be tested on. He has a strong accent, and it is difficult to read what he is writing on the board. You must read the whole textbook and put in hours of studying outside of class if you want to pass this class.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Weekly homework but doesnt really help your grade because most of it is just exams, only 12 questions MC so not too bad but also means you'll fail if you get like 4 wrong, notes were pretty hard to read and he doesnt post lecture recordings but they dont really help much anyway. Used the textbook and online resources more.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His exams are base on Homework and few question he suggested. His lecture is confused, fulled of proof that didn't help you study at all. Study homework , you will pass the course. study and be lucky , you will get an A. Better take other Prof. His TA didn't know how he grade the exam so go ask him directly.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He's a good lecturer, slight accent but I didn't have any issues with it. Clears up some difficult concepts and usually proves them in an intuitive way. Homework is very easy, and exams are like homework. The grading is a little tough though, you need an average of 93% on the exams to get an A, and they consist of 12 MCQ, so only 1 wrong per exam.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
His tests are all multiple choice so it can be quite daunting. On the plus side, the questions are very similar to Quest homework so review those before each exam. The final was slightly harder but doable. While his lectures may seem disorganized, he covers all the material you need for homework and exams so at least try and watch the lectures.