Reviews of professor Rong (Ratchel) Zeng

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures are very long and boring.She is very unclear with her instructions and does not know what she is doing. She goes over how to do assignments after you have already handed them in and instructions are unclear or nonexistent. Overall a harsh marker and would not recommend.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Really cares about students. Pushes you to participate more in lectures and challenges you to delve deeper into subjects.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
lectures are very long and boring. She often does not finish lectures in time and will leap you 5 to 10 minutes after class ended. She goes over how to do assignments after you have already handed them in and instructions are unclear or nonexistent. Overall a harsh marker and would not recommend.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Unclear criteria and overall cloudy grading process. Not strong in English, I would recommend avoiding this professor if you can.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She cares about her students. I took the summer course with her. The first time for me to take the summer course. So I was a little bit concerned because of the fast pace. However, she tried her best to encourage us to be on track of all the assignments. She used many activities to engage us in the three-hour class. I like her style.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I found that she cared for her students and always wanted to hear what they had to say. The only thing to really look out for would be her grading scheme. For the class I took, you needed 75% to JUST get a B. In every other class I've taken I would have had a B or even a B+. Just something to look at if you're considering INTB 2200 for a GPAbooster

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Lectures feel like an eternity, very hard to follow.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
She makes you read the textbooks and the lectures are a mess. I dont understand what she is saying a lot of the time because she goes back and forth on topics. The lectures are odd, as she focuses on group activities (games and such). "Pop quizzes" (on the chapter she's supposed to lecture on that class, but you get the quiz at the start) are hard.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Difficult to understand. Unclear criteria for marking. Generally condescending. Difficult pop quizzes. Slides aren't bad but lectures are important.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Not a fan of the content but that was outside of her hands. She made class interesting with some fun group activities and encouraged the class to participate actively. Fairly lenient on grading, and gives good feedback on how to improve your work. Overall if you're interested in international business she would be a great choice for a professor.