Reviews of professor Sarah Chavez

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
inconsistent. Lectures were disorganized and not really professional. Did daily sign in sheets like we were on high school again. No clarity on how assignments were to be conducted (last minute changes) and was inconsistent on her own grading criteria. Another said they had their final grade submitted late, I did as well. Very disappointing.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Dr. Chavez gave pretty good feedback when you could get it, but I agree she was pretty condescending and the level of strictness and classroom "rules" made it feel like a high school class. She was pretty rude to some students and it made everyone uncomfortable. Do not bring any tech in her class. The textbooks were interesting.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
idk where to begin. Incredibly condescending. Defiantly puts on a nice personality when in the classroom, but it not helpful/nice with feedback. Very snarky. Incredibly slow at grading and harsh with grading requirements. Syllabus is so heavy who knows what the requirements are. When I said I was a running start kid she questioned my credentials

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I took this class last quarter and she was enthusiastic about the subject. However, her last assignments towards the end of the quarter take up a lot of time which is a lot, especially during dead week and midterms. They also carry a heavy percentage towards your grade. If you're taking easier less loaded classes then this class should be fine.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
This was a food writing course--supposedly. In fact, it was functionally a poetry course about ethnic cuisine, which would be fine, except that the professor seemed uninterested in exploring theory or giving solid instruction to students. Somehow, this wound up being one of the biggest disappointments in my college career, but it was an easy A(-).

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
really cool person but the class was a mess. no one ever knew what was going on. grades super late (like last week of the quarter late) & can be kind of condescending/rude. if you show up & do the work you'll be fine but ive never seen such a heavy/tedious workload for an intro class. good lectures tho

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I expected to enjoy this class a lot more than I did. We had a book club meeting every week where we discussed some of the books that were required for the course. The final assignment was a group project, but we could've used more preparation in class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Hard to get email replies from if you get one at all, even w/ pledge of a 48hr turnaround. Snarky in replying, assumes any confusion is your own fault. VERY SLOW in grading, did not give much feedback if any until it was too late to make changes. Perpetually slow in putting out weekly modules/lectures. Absolutely Disappointed to say the least