Reviews of professor Scott Chapman

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Pretty sure the first review was done by Prof. Chapman himself and that speaks to his character. Very funny, very unapologetically confident. Look, he knows his stuff in and out. He makes things easy to learn and outlines for you. Just memorize, participate in class and you will do great.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I love this professor. The best person to teach this class and so good looking too!!!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Prof. Chapman is genuinely a nice person and truly cares about student learning. After a rocky start to the course with remote lectures (which granted, wasn't his fault given that he did not live in Vancouver), he implemented student feedback well, thus greatly improving the course. He also gave really cool intros to current astronomy experiments!!

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is obviously a more talented researcher than prof. Lectures are very dry, obviously knowledgeable about the material, but bad at communicating it. This course is made especially difficult because it is very conceptual and he's not great at communicating concepts. Wouldn't recommend him.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He wrote the textbook. Yeah, he is that bright. He is funny, confident, a true gem. He is easy to follow and brings in speakers which enhance the course. I wish he was a full time professor.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Scott began the semester by appearing to be a self-centered and reluctant to be teaching, but we later realized this was entirely not true. He is very receptive to feedback and tries to improve the course he is teaching because he actually listens to the students. Being open with and talking to Scott will ensure an enjoyable semester with him.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I attended every class and learned next to nothing.