Reviews of professor Christopher Churchill

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Its obvious he cares about his students, however he often seems like he is scrambling with talking and it is hard to understand the point he is trying to get across, which make his lectures hard to pay attention in. This being said if you make the effort he will help you improve.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
In my opinion, his tests are weighed way too much and his essays not enough. His essays are only worth 10% which barely makes it worth writing as they do take a lot of time. The division of his test is odd and only have five multiple choices is quite frustrating and is very random from his lecture so you need to know every detail from his lectures.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Awesome prof. Weekly teamwork prepares you for the midterm and final which are straight forward if you do the work. Very reading heavy. Lectures are important, but he also posts the slides. One of my favourite profs. Easily reachable and gives amazing feedback. He wants to see you succeed and do well. Clearly loves with he does.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
had him for both hist1200 and 2150 and he is a fair prof who genuinely cares about his students. Only tests what was covered either in lectures or our readings. Does group work so attendance is mandatory some days. Really passionate about what he teaches and is easy to get an A if you keep on top of things.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
HIST 2150 was a required course for me that I was not looking forward to in the first place but, when I met Chris, I thought it wouldn't be so bad. I was wrong. His exams are the majority of your class grade, attendance and participation matter on group discussion days, two essays are a small portion. Chris is flexible and will try to help you.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Pretty good as far as professors go. You can tell he's very passionate about what he does and wants you to succeed. Very available for discussion in and out of class - he won't stop until you understand. That being said, the constant group projects are annoying nd his entire teaching policy is based on those useless assignments

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Churchill is extremely caring and his lectures are full of passion. The group work can be arduous, but helps you understand the concepts to a greater extent so studying for the final is easier. Loved his class, even when attending hungover.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Chruchill tries really hard to a good and relatable prof, but he would benefit largely by being a liberal education prof rather than a history prof. His classes are very unorganized, have zero structure, includes NO real fact learning, and spends most the classes on random tangents. If you are a true lover of history education, DONT take this class

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is very smart, and can tell that he loves what he does. He did group assignments every Friday and thats when he would take attendance. The midterm was very tough because it was all hand written (no moodle) and you really had to read and understand the concepts.