Reviews of professor Eric Hehman

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Funny lecturer, but I do agree that the exams were not always 100% reflective of all the content covered. Had very intricate questions, like you had to remember a specific sentence from a specific paragraph of the textbook. I recommend staying on top of textbook readings & podcasts as often as possible. Quizzes/extra cred help boost marks too!

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Despite being an entertaining lecturer, Hehman fails to provide his class adequate resources to succeed on his exams. The final was extremely unfair; having questions that were EXTREMELY specific, vague, and failed to provide questions applying the concepts in a fair testable manner. His lectures doesn't provide any value towards the exams as well.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
If you want to succeed in this class you should just memorize the info in the textbook and in any and everything else he posts as material because the final seems to be mostly vague facts from very niche material rather than application questions.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
worst final exam ever. says the final will be harder than the midterm and to do the math extra credit, but also had to add 2 free questions to the midterm because the class average was bad. unfair questions and longest readings ever, at this point just memorize the textbook

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
For such a great lecturer, the exams feel unrevised and poorly put together. The questions are unclear, vague, and there is an expectation to memorize very fine details. Overall, I feel like I was graded not by my overall understanding of concepts; I feel like I was graded based on if I read that one specific textbook paragraph about an experiment.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
he gives funny and interesting lectures, but his final exam felt very unfair. no amount of preparation could have prepared you for some of the questions he decided to ask, and it genuinely felt like he was trying to trick students with questions on small details of studies rather than testing major concepts and key takeaways of the course.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Great prof who's really entertaining. Exams weren't as bas as people were saying, however were still definitely difficult. He really should incorporate study guides or at least provide more support for exam prep, but overall interesting class and good prof. Would take again and study a little harder.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Very engaging lecturer. Got an A without memorizing the entire textbook. It's very doable if you know the lecture/quiz content very well + feel comfortable applying it. Use the online quizzes to boost your grade and memorize all the textbook vocab terms. The midterm was way more fair than the final. There is also an option for extra credit.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
he was such a king but his tests were difficult. however, social psyc in general is a lot of memorization so you can't really avoid that. his quizzes were super easy though.