Reviews of professor Paul Savariappan

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Code is printed out and handed to us in class. The instructor doesn't understand the code given out in class because when asked about it he responds with "I don't know". The moodle is messy and hard to navigate. The lectures are very disengaging and focuses the majority of lectures on material we are not tested on or given homework on.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Easy grader so no chance of failing but do not take if you want to actually understand statistics. Half the stuff isn't on his slides (only videos) and some things he doesn't go over at all! Easy to get stumped on busy homework assignments because he lectures on something for an hour without ever getting to the point.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Paul is an exact 3/5 professor. His lectures were boring and I felt that he wasn't the best at some explanations, but it was clear that he cared for his students. Around 7-ish homeworks which were all pretty similar to what was done in class. Two tests and a final which didn't typically have any surprises, but not a lot of room to make mistakes.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Paul is a really nice guy and accessible outside of class. Was very flexible with assignments during the COVID pandemic. Tests are hard and homework weighted heavily, but are fair. He definitely knows what he is talking about, sometimes talks in circles, but is always willing to explain more. Definitely recommend Paul!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Dr. Paul was a pretty average professor, he only gave us 6 homeworks and no projects which is far less intense than other stats classes from what I've heard. His lectures were pretty boring and I watched most of them online and still did fine. His quizzes can be quite annoying, but he gives plenty of helpful study material.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Regression Analysis is arguably the most important statistic class, and Paul is unarguably the worst professor in the department. Lectures are useless and unorganized, homeworks are LONG, unclear, and randomly assigned (claims HW only takes an hour, more like 5 hours), 3 exams that aren't easy. AVOID at all costs; I guarantee you'll learn nothing.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Such a sweet guy. Very good lectures. Nothing bad to say about him. I would take him again because he knows me by name and would have sweet stories of his family he would tell after many lectures. 
We ended class early very often and he canceled a few classes because he taught content well and efficiently.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
His teaching style is very powerpoint based. He is caring (let us out and told personal stories) but when asked questions didn't give me satisfying explanations, more along the lines of "this is the theory" or "here is the algebra." I did not attend office hours. Tests seemed fair. Reading the textbook helped somewhat.