Reviews of professor Julie Gamble

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
There is so many papers for the Cities Program Seminar its ridiculous. On top of that, she sucks as a lecturer. I would not take this womans class again if my life depended on it. She is also extremely unreasonable with deadlines.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Gamble is very condescending and her lectures are very long and hard to follow. Took this class because I was interested in the material but will never take another urban studies class after my experience with her

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She is by far the worst professor I have ever had. Clearly has never taught a college class before. Sometimes I think she is learning the material with us, considering she has to check her notes every 30 seconds making her lecture sound choppy and hard to follow. She assumes we know everything she says and doesn't offer explanations. DO NOT TAKE.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
A combination of horrible, unconnected lectures, wildly specific exam questions and little to no coherence throughout the course made this bar none, the worst class experience I have ever had at Trinity. She has trouble reading out loud, which is an issue as every lecture is just a collection of slides. Please don't take her class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She made me hate urban studies and I can't even hear those words now. Her lectures were hard to follow and incredibly boring. She would call on students randomly and would ask very specific questions that no one would know. She was also terrible at giving explanations to any of the subject material and expected everyone to already know everything.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Great class, interesting readings, 3 tests and a paper