Reviews of professor Roberto Bobadilla

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Pros: Roberto obviously knows what he's talking about in class.
Cons: Everything else.
Roberto is the single laziest professor I've ever had. All his lectures are worse summaries of various sources. There are too many instances of his laziness to fit in this review. He just couldn't be bothered to do anything for anyone, and is content in doing so.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
For an awful report-based course, Dr Gallardo really tried to make MEC E 403 bearable. Luckily, he realizes how terrible the course is, and made us only do 3 reports and two quizzes instead of 5 reports. Shoutout to my man for not wanting students to be absolutely destroyed by a ridiculous workload. Accent is noticeable but he speaks clearly.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
What Professor Roberto omitted from the lecture was put to the test. Additionally, he doesn't seem to care too much about the struggles of the pupils.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This class has been the bane of my existence. Lectures are useless, he rambles instead of teaching actually useful things.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Poor wording lectures and examples. No previous sample exams or assignments. No detailed lecture example explanations, not to mention that his lecture examples are ten light years different than the real assignments/quiz/exam problems. Will never take his course again.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Hilarious !

Teaches something puts something else on the test

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
For an engineering class on communication, the questions on the 12-minute test worth 15% of your marks were along the lines of "True or False, Place A was underwater at some point". Attendance is not "mandatory" but you then find "Guest speaker picked their nose at the 37-minute mark, which nose did he/she pick" as a question on the test.