Reviews of professor Peter Dietsch

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
An introductory course, yet course setup treats us like we have a Phil Ph.D. Unclear expectations & harsh grading scheme. EXTREMELY long weekly readings to summarize for 1%, & ONLY 500 words! Many readings are unintelligible; one states, "in the next sextion" while another mentions the "sanitized realm of abstract modelling" (just some examples) ?!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Took phil 232 at uvic. He set the class up for failure. Overloaded lectures with complicated info. large weekly  hard to read desne literature, no textbook. Essay worth 40% with no assigned writing before/ marked very hard. Cumulative closed book exam worth 50% with no preparation (6 essay questions on anything we've learned the whole semester)