Reviews of professor Sandra Sepulveda-Kozakowski

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Sepulveda-Kozakowski read off disorganized PowerPoints the entire semester. She teaches very slow, to the point of it being pretty difficult to stay engaged in lecture. Several questions on exams were subjective, despite being multiple choice. Few other assignments/quizzes determined final grades. She's nice and understanding, though.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Really bad teaching skills. She presents all her talking points as if they're facts, and her generic powerpoint presentation style only made this worse. This is the only academic experience I've had where it felt like the prof was just there to reinforce common perspectives on the content and totally sidestep any opportunity for broader discussion.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
She's extremely easygoing during class and won't bother you to participate much.  Super friendly and adds to the lecture with her own experiences, which is really helpful.  If you take careers in psych with her, she has a textbook listed but you never practically use it so don't bother wasting the money.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She is very knowledgeable however her lectures can be boring and her exams can be subjective however if you put the work in you will do fine.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She talks really slow and it's hard to pay attention. She also tests on a lot of material at once so it's hard to keep up.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I took her for Psy 1004. Material is taught through lectures, which are pretty boring. Lectures can also be disorganized and make it difficult to follow the topics, and on occasion she uses different definitions of concepts than the textbook. Her exams are my main complaint, and they were unnecessarily difficult and made the material subjective.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She's super sweet and she used to be a clinical psychologist practitioner so she is knowledgable and uses examples from her experiences. She also will notice things people didn't do well on the first exam and try to change the question formats to make it easier for her students to succeed. Go to class and use her study guides and you'll succeed.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This was an online class that met over zoom, but it was super enjoyable. If this interests you, take it. Quizzes once a week and three exams that are self explanatory. If you put in some effort you will do well.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures were boring. Tests were subjective. Her teaching style wasn't for me but one of the easier geneds.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I passed but I wouldn't take her again.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
she's an alright teacher, all the material is contained in the power points and textbook (textbook is required but can be easily pirated online). If you pay attention and do your readings you'll be fine. 
Main complaint is her terrible discussion leading skills, she'll ask questions and provide zero response to people who answer