Reviews of professor Erin Heerey

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Cited Wikipedia as a source...

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Graded fairly with some opportunity for extra credit. Often went on tangents about things which made her lectures hard to follow. Would often not explain the reasoning behind things or provide sufficient examples and insight as if we would have learned the material prior.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This course truly needs to be revamped or after another prof available.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
So frustratingly terrible at her job - belittles students and suggested we ALL don't care or we ALL must be cheating off past labs when the ave for the midterm was low....there is one other thing that might cause a low ave: her poor teaching. Average midterm grade was something like 63...just awful. Stats can be SO cool and she makes it not ):

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Heerey was a tough grader, but gave feedback in class and labs. She genuinely wanted her students to succeed, even if her lectures could've been more organized. If you hate on Heerey, WAIT until you take 2802  with Macpherson, THAT'S when you'll realize that Heerey wasn't that bad, and you'll actually WISH she would teach you again.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She made all the videos for the Python coding labs, which was awesome. Null hypothesis significance testing is a difficult concept. She expects a lot on the exams, but I also found her to be fair. She has clear thresholds for question validity on her exams. A stats prof using stats effectively.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Just awful. Truly just awful. Doesn't even know how to teach....

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
her infamy is well-deserved. doesn't teach course material in lectures and simultaneously expects students to know as much about the content as someone studying it for 40 years. passive-aggressive if you ask for help. loves to make instructions as vague as possible.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I don't know how to express in words what a miserable experience taking 2811 with Heerey was. Would give 0 out of 5 if I could. Absolutely nothing about this class was enjoyable.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Dr.Heerey complicates simple concepts and ends up presenting a boring and disturbing class. She is rude and disrespectful to her students and when I asked her questions, she showed all in disgust. I don't understand why any professor could be so impatient and offensive. Sincere advice to everyone, do not take her class!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
The course was rough but doable. My only concern is that it was confusing talking with her because she'd alternate between being really nice, and jumping to assumptions and being passive aggressive.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
"It's the last class so now you don't have to see my ugly face every day." - Erin Heerey on the last class. She is so self depricating, it's not even funny just annoying. Her exams are not fair. Some of the questions are fine, and some you're handwriting 9 lines of code. Only took because it was mandatory.