Reviews of professor Nick Eaves

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
-Work load is very heavy -Lab was interesting -Lecture slides could use more text to explain figures -include engine performance eqns in slides -Lectures were interesting but hard to follow when keeping up with writing -textbook isnt that useful, outside of assignment problems

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
For quizess, Professor told us 80% was from assignment and the rest 20% was from lecture slide or class notes. You don't have to make it perfect, but at least, you can work hard to get the 80%. He cares about students. I remember he knew we had a midterm from other course in the same week, he just rescheduled the assignment deadline. Thank you pro!

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Good prof. Really cares about how well his lectures are

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Even though i got an 80% on the final. Horrible Prof, does not explain any concepts clearly. Had to teach myself the course. On top of this, he did not show up to office hours for two weels before the final.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
A bright spot in an otherwise weird semester.  I really enjoyed the material and liked the professor's approachability and willingness to help. He knows his stuff. Told me how I could do better, and offered some pointers for assignments.  Hard marker, but at least he is consistent.  Clearly he wants you to succeed.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Bad... Just bad. He gave little to no examples during class and just made jokes the whole time. The final was unfairly marked and had an extremely low average for a course that realistically should've been easy. Overall seems like a nice guy just not great at his job.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He's hilarious, caring, inspirational (if you have existential dread and Down Syndrome). A human representation of entropy.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He was the worst professor ever, he even did not teach us, just sent us recorded videos.
The content is plain and there is no explanation in detail.
Kinda disappointed about my first semester, this course and VTM are definitely boring.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Spends most of the class trying to make jokes about himself. Forgets that he actually has to teach. No examples. He just stands there reading slides, interjecting with attempts of witty humor. Unfair grading criteria on his exam.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Horrible grading criteria and gives no indication of what marks are given for. Not present during exam, nor were questions allowed to be asked.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Tested the class on questions they have never seen before and nitpicked marks on the final exam for information that was not required to be there.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Grading criteria on Final was TRASH. Literally could have had the easiest exam, yet had to grade things using a horrible method. If you got Eaves, RUN.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Super approachable, helpful, and wants students to succeed. Great prof.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Useless prof!!!!!! Reads off slides he didnt even make and puts ridiculous trick questions on exams.