Reviews of professor Matthew Jaremski

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof Jeremski is a very good professor. He really knows his stuff and you can tell he is a smart guy. If you really want to learn and put in effort, he is very willing to help you understand and he is interesting to listen to. He wants his students to do well and learn

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He cares about his students, although his lectures are very difficult to sit through at times. Tests can be hard and confusing. Take GOOD notes.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Great lectures and he knows the subject very well. Easy B, but a decent amount of effort for an A. He also trusts students way to much... no camera for online proctored exam. If I would have just pulled up my notes on another laptop I would have got a 100 on every exam - very tempting lol. Class is very well structured and easy to stay on top of.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This is his first year teaching- had a few kinks to work out with how hard his tests are since this is an entry class. He has made progress in fixing the difficulty of exams. Still a lecture heavy class with boring lectures. I fall asleep quite a bit. He struggles to take economic history and take it into the realm of learning from our history.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
great teacher but his teaching style doesnt really work with most. he lectures for a month then has a midterm and he does that same thing two more times. you will not pass if you dont study for the midterms and the final. rough.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Pure lecture class on economic history with 3 tests & comprehensive final. The data for first test as others said is true, the second test improved, average was 82% He knows the material well and is willing to meet with students when they have questions, but this class is only graded on tests. Lots of articles to read (ave. 45-50 pages per class).

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Jaremski is very knowledgable on the subject he teaches and can address all questions relating to his subject. His class pushes you and requires studying; however he truly cares about his students and wants to see you succeed and is willing to work with you to succeed. I would definitely take another course if one was offered by him.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Wouldn't wish this on my worst enemies. Avoid at all costs if you can. Pure lecture, no hw, and tests are ridiculous. First test averaged 56%, let us retake using notes and unlimited time, only went up to 72%. Tests are poorly written (not just hard, but poorly written). Required class, but don't take him if you can avoid it! Lectures  boring!

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He was okay. He makes the tests sound a lot easier than what they actually are. He says their isn't any trick questions but there are plenty of them. Try to avoid taking this class from him you'd be better off taking it from a different professor if possible. However, if he's the only option be prepared for trick questions on the midterms&final.