Reviews of professor Sean Richmond

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Cool guy Boring Lecturer. Lots of guest speakers and you get quizzed on them for exam. Case brief easy, midterm hard marker, few reading quizzes, don't have to read just control F and will get 100%. Final exam is 40% in person. Often has to defer lots of lecture content to next week and you end up cramming everything into one week. take if have to

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Although he gave a take home mid term, he is the most boring prof ever. His slides are in question format, he is SO monotone, and to top it off, it is a 3 hour lecture. He takes too many breaks when I would much rather get through the slides to get the hell out of the class. do not take this unless it is mandatory.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Sean is nice but talks very slow, he lectured slides are not helpful whatsoever. They are all questions based and when the audio switches over you are unable to hear the answers. I would most likely not take his class again. He really focuses on the textbook but doesnt really provide helpful information on what should be focused on.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Sean Richmond is one of the most bland, uninspiring and lazy professors I have ever had. His lecture slides were directly from the textbook and the grade composition was minimalist - a 40/60 split between a midterm and an exam. This caused many students to finish with a poor mark. DO NOT take his class, it is dry and poorly comprised.