Reviews of professor Mahmoud Moradi

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Take his class, you wont have fun.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Moradi is the absolute worst lecturer... He is hard to follow, doesnt interact with the class at all, and doesnt explain concepts well. He uses the words simple easy and straightforward for every equation or concept we learn. This lecture will be one of the worst you take because his lack of emotion and interest in your success.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures are pointless he just throws random words together. If you read the book before class you can kinda understand what he is meaning in between the "ums". I attended his and Dr. Brewers lectures because she actually taught and I got LC credit for his lectures. Work hard and you'll get an A but I recommend Dr. Brewer, she actually cares.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He teaches like the students already know what they are doing and he expects you to come to class with the information already. He requires that you read the book for all the sections assigned before coming to class so that you are able to answer questions that he gives right away. He gets very behind on information that we need for homework too.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
dr. moradi knows what he is talking about but doesn't deliver the material in an accessible way for all students. i had to put in a lot of effort to keep up with the lectures and he doesn't record them. however, he is a very nice guy and will help you if you go to office hours

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
By far one of the worst experiences I've had with a professor. Class average for 2 tests was approx. a 48, proceeds to tell the class that the test was easy and that it is a result of our "study habits." Teaches the course like we should already know the information. Avoid taking Moradi's class if you can.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Run away. Do yourself a favor by not taking this class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
By far one of the worst teachers I've had. His lectures are hard to follow and has yet to work out any of the quantitative problems. He thinks the F test average for all his classes is our fault when really he is the one who is teaching us and not explaining anything. Little to no extra credit and very hard to understand when he speaks.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Instructed the PChem lab. He is very smart but cannot translate his knowledge into student understanding. His pre-lab lectures were unorganized and usually more confusing than the lab manuals (which were also horrible). The lab reports fulfill a college writing requirement so they are meant to be thorough. My TA got me through this lab, not him

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He gets hate for no reason. He gives an unbelievable amount of extra credit (like 50 bonus points for every 100 point test). His lectures are fine, he goes real slow so everyone understands. He basically gives out homework answers in office hours. The tests are literally just the practice test + homework. An A is 85% on top of all of that.