Reviews of professor Robin Roe

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Her voice was very melancholy, and it was hard to hear her. The exams are completely based on the lectures, and they are online but proctored. It is an easy A if you pay attention, but I would not take her again.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
show up to lectures to get participation grades and quizzes. Fairly easy A as long as you go to lectures and take notes

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Easy class, you just have to show up. Slides have like 30 words and she talks forever so you have to be taking notes if you want to learn anything. Daily assignments only for people that showed up. I would read the articles but avoid the really long readings they aren't really necessary. Pretty easy A IMO.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I took 106, not 105 but it wasn't an option. 
EXAMS OVER ZOOM!!  SHE POSTS THE NOTES and doesn't add much information outside of what's posted. READING but not really required. This is an easy A class and you can keep it on the backburner fr.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
HIST 226 with Roe is a lecture heavy class! She doesn't take attendance, but the tests are taken directly from her lecture material and you gotta pay attention. Amazing woman, very kind, seriously enjoys when you engage with her! Queer friendly prof, put in effort and you're rewarded! Gives extra credit too.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Though attendance isn't mandatory, you must attend the lectures in order to know what's going on. Class goes a bit fast so take notes during class, and revise at home. She's kind and articulate, and instructions are clear. She does speak a bit too fast so try to preview the slides before class so you don't get lost. IMO this was an easy A.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This is about the worst class I have ever taken! She is very nice and addresses the class calmly, however, her slides are very uninformative. I had to record her lessons to listen to later because her lectures were impossible to keep up with, even then it was hard to tell when she switched to a new topic. All in all, there are better professors.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Very few assignments, but very simple. She gave extra credit for attending lecture and doing end-quizes, but attendance not required. Only paper was 1 page min and very lentient grading.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Have to attend every lecture to do well because the slides she posts only contain a few keywords without details. She refuses to record lectures to benefit students who miss class- even if it is excused. Assignments about the lecture are posted at random times on class days without notifications to incentivize attendance. Material is easy though.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
 makes us do discussions nobody even talks to each other online to do a group discussion, too many questions for an exam like come on, its so unnecessary