Reviews of professor Susanna Werth

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
A very boring, but very nice professor. She practically gives you the answers to the final and the midterm in the review sessions, and there are infinite attempts on the homework quizzes, so you have to try to do bad in this class.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Dr. Werth is a good professor. You have one lecture per week, which may roll into both class meetings, then an article read and questions to awnser. These questions typically end up in the discussion board. One reply, and two peer replies per week. Pretty straight forward class. Would take again.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Really boring lectures, attendance is taken with passwords at the end, and all the answers to every question she asks test and all is on one of few quizlets she uses.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Dr. Werth is a good professor. When it comes to her lectures, its mostly just looking over powerpoints and some basic explaining and short videos. After every class theres a quiz that goes over the material learned that class. The quiz is pretty easy if you have the powerpoint open and they have unlimited attempts. The class is easy if you listen

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Dr. Werth, although diligent and timely in her responses to students questions in each module regarding assignments, seems to beat around the bush and never provides a solution to the students problem. It feels like an advanced course of Computer Science. No lecture videos have been posted to actually INSTRUCT her students. 40/hour for a tutor.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Worst class ever. It is supposed to be an intro to GIS with Python it is instead an intermediate Python course with limited guidance and information. I myself have completed intro to python and it was no where near this hard. Every single student has reported her to the department, it's a horrendous mess. Avoid her at all costs.