Reviews of professor Julian Rrushi

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Prof. Rrushi did not know what he was doing when it came to programming in C. The entire lecture--mandatory attendance--was him trying to debug and going off on tangents about things to which he says "forget that, its not important". He comes to the lecture late and unprepared, and the lectures themselves are a jumbled mess and unprofessional.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
An incredible Professor who's goal is to create a phenomenal learning environment for all. There were so many positive traits that I could not add to this post as there is a maximum of three, but this man is the best that there is to offer, and if you are going to take a course where he is an option, you'd be a fool to choose otherwise.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Goat professor. Take him.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Rrushi is an amazing professor. He goes out of his way to form lectures based on advice given from students, he is very thorough with explanations, and he gets all the content out in time while making sure everyone understands it. Perfect professor. I look forward to his classes because I know I will learn something.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Julian is a nice enough guy, he is just not the best at teaching. He is very out of touch students and it is very frustrating . He does not follow the syllabus very often. His lectures are more like rants where he just uses the class time to go over code in a powerpoint. He doesn't usually get very far either.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The only professor that I know of that lets students outline the exams. He asks for feedback constantly. The in-class code reflects the projects and exams quite well. Exams are open note, so if you look at your code and compare it to the exams, you should have an easy A.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
One of the best class I have ever taken

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
He's honestly the GOAT. He's a bit quirky (in a good way) and really cares about his students. His grading is very generous, open note quizzes, easy to talk to. Definitely take him

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Outstanding professor. Takes feedback from the class on a regular basis. Adapted his teaching to the class I was in. Lectures are interactive, with heavy use of the board. Group work is also interesting, if he doesn't get us started first thing after the class starts early in the morning. Projects were hard, and so was the midterm. Very demanding.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He is a very smart and caring professor, he wants you to succeed. However, he is rarely prepared for his lectures, and as a result the class is very unorganized and clear. I took him a few years ago and looking back at the assignments, they were flat out misleading, and the code in them was a horrible example for learning programmers.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
The class pretty much consisted of Prof. Rrushi being confused by C. I hear he is great for other courses, though. Just avoid for programming in C. His lectures were very messy though, so I question that statement. Unstructured and unorganized.