Reviews of professor Lukas (Luke) Gunderson

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Gunderson is one of those egotistical professors who wants to mansplain why your subjective opinion on the weekly discussion is wrong. He also assigns way too much for a basic survey course. Not only are there tests, but you get to do a two page paper every single time there's an exam on some old books he scanned that he thinks are epic. AVOID.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Lame. Makes you write a convoluted term paper so he can harshly grade it and flex how his analysis and interpretation of history is more supreme than yours. Makes you attend mandatory library resource meetings to teach you how to type letters into a search engine for sources. Comes off as arrogant and rude in his replies to the lecture discussions

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
He is a great teacher. his lectures are easy to understand and they engage you in history for someone like myself that wasn't really into history. he gives out 3 test and 3 quizzes in a good time gap. he also does a class test review the week before taking the test which guarantees you an 'A' on the test as long as you study. do the work and pass.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Good teacher,replies quick but the lectures are soooo slow and painful to watch. I have to but the speed at 2x but either way daily easy class. Watch two 1 hour long videos Tuesday and thrusdays write down what you though what you learned and reply to someone. Only bad thing is the essay, that's what lowered my grade from a high A to a low C.