Reviews of professor Nina Glibetic

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She was very respectful of everyone's views, and although I had her for an online course, I did not feel like I knew her less than one normally would know their professor. Very personable, caring, and passionate about subject matter.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
There is a bit more reading compared to some of the other classes, but it was interesting and Professor Glibetic challenges you to think differently about a lot of different topics. I like how she tried to be balanced and encouraged people with different views to express themselves.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
One of the best professors for first Theo. Reading before each class, but it is much less than others. No homework outside of one group project. Very knowledgable and a great communicator regardless of prior experience with religion. Attendance and participation are MANDATORY. One excused absence and then you go down letter grades.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I registered for this required Theo because it fit my schedule. I was surprised to discover how much I enjoyed it. If you just want to skim readings, you'll probably still get a good grade. But by trial and error I discovered I only got a lot from the lectures when I did the readings slower and took notes. So don't take if you don't want to read.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Slightly more reading that I was expecting for a required intro to Theology, but I understand she was really trying to push us to higher standards, which I appreciated. I really liked the lectures and the material. Overall, a great class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Apart from the reviews here, I haven't met anyone who didn't rank this as one of their least favorite classes. Format for the midterm and final is wildly subjective, readings for the class are incredibly dry, and her lectures make 75 minutes feel like 6 hours. I struggle to find any reason you'd take this class if you had literally any other option