Reviews of professor Charlie Crerar

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Had an A all semester until he decided to upload the grades for the final a couple hours before they were due... (we handed them in over a week earlier). I spent a lot of time on my paper, and his low-ball grade brought my overall grade down to a B. Really frustrating because he is a great guy but I got blindsided by this grade.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Charlie can make some boring philosphy ideas into interesting subjects for discussion within your team. You can get more than B from this course as long as you go to class and read the slides. There are 6 easy quizzes, 3 writing exercise and a final paper. You get two trials for the quizzes, and the first writing is always 100 for everyone.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The material was not bad, but the writing was. he wanted the papers done in a very specific way. i didn't do too well on the first two papers so i decided to talk to him before writing my final. he didn't help and i still got a low grade on my final. maybe its because i had a hard time thinking in the way that philosophy requires me to think. idk

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He was a good teacher and really cares about the subject. However, it is important to note that he is hard on grading essays. You need to really understand your topic and follow his format in order to get a good grade on it. He moderates discussions so really it is up to the class to participate as well in his lectures.