Reviews of professor Zachary Wolske

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Amazing experience in mat344. Felt like he really wanted you to learn combinatorics.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Very kind professor, care about his students

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Zachary's teaching style is very unfriendly, answering your questions with more questions and often incorportaing passive-aggressive tones into his response. By conducting a statistical test with the null hypothesis that Zach is a good teacher, At 0.1*10^344 sig level, there is evidence to suggest that the null hypothesis is false. Drop on sight.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
You get a challenging assignment every single week and each assignment can easily take 15+ hours. The grading scheme is very harsh and unforgiving, and your hard work does not necessarily pay off in his class. The midterm was a special assignment available for a week, which was EXTREMELY HARD and the grade came out after the dropping deadline.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Poor teaching style and unable to formulate the material appropriately for its intended audience. Assignments and tests on a different planet in contrast to the lectures. They take an unreasonable amount of time and only an undisclosed small portion of them are actually graded.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Professor Zachary's demeanor is rather condescending, and his teaching style is atrocious. Assignment grading lacks clarity, and achieving good grades is a difficult task -- even with ample studying. On a more personal note, I genuinely do not understand how or why the university employs such professors. A huge waste of money.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The lecture was just him asking the class a couple questions, writing up answers on the board, and then clicking the next slide. Visiting office hours resulted in nothing because he really didn't teach anything in class, what's he going to show you in a couple minutes? Learned more from the tutorial than the actual class.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Honestly, I just really appreciate how understanding and caring he was this semester with deadlines and stuff. I'm coming in from another STEM department and his attitude is honestly a godsend.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I enjoyed going to his lecture because he explained concepts clearly. Also he is very understanding and caring for his students. He is really passionate about teaching math. The only thing I would complain is that his assignments were difficult.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His lectures were fun and amazing. Assignments were challenging and some of the questions were modified from math contests. Some ppl complained about the difficulty. But to be honest, if you are a university student, you shouldn't expect someone feeds the food directly into your mouth. His class demonstrated "Practice makes perfect".