Reviews of professor Evan Gromel

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Lectures are very confusing, half the time he doesn't focus on the actual criteria, he spends the entire class discussing the history of a text, and never discusses the actual text. His quizzes are based on very specific things from the reading, which is frustrating because the class is about analyzing literature, not distinguishing small details.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
His lectures give themes and ideas that you should be familiar with for exams and papers. Discussions expand on the ideas and history of the stories rather than the story themselves. Generally a very fair class if you put in the time and effort. He doesn't go in depth on how to write papers but is very open to helping anyone who is struggling.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I don't understand the nature of these comments about Mr. Gromel, that being said I am pretty good at english and I didn't find his class hard. He is very kind not to have multiple novels in the course, (I found a PDF online for the novel and didn't even read the whole thing). His exams are pretty easy (you get to pick what questions you answer).

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Just read it. Do your best to survive. Get that D. And get out. He's not too bad, but I just suck at English so it's a little hard. If you look at his slides they're usually just to consolidate your knowledge. IN CONCLUSION... just dab ur way through and hope you dont get run over. :DDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
It seems like he tries to care, but the problem is that he doesn't teach what he's supposed to. This course was supposed to teach how to analyze texts and write persuasive essays, but he never actually talked about it. He only ever talked about the backgrounds of the authors and then would run out of class time. Really disappointing.