Reviews of professor Michael Kurak

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Had to read many different materials. The lectures only consisted of him reading directly from the text that we were told to read ourselves.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
One of the worst professors I have ever had. Lectures were not useful and were incredibly difficult to follow along. Despite him taking up entire lectures to summarize the texts, he only served to further confuse the class and was not helpful at all. Unless you know the texts as well as if you wrote them yourself, you will not get a good grade.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
We read (or were expected to read) 6 HEAVY philosophical texts in their entirety. The exam questions were paragraphs long and he could barely fit 3 questions on each page. FOR MULTIPLE CHOICE? Lectures consisted of him reading verbatim from the text every class. It appeared as if it was his first time reading the material every class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He covered too much content, did not have a plan for the class, and relied too heavily on students to run the class. Would only take this class if it were a requirement. Would not take a class with this prof again. (I'm a A- average student..)