Reviews of professor Joseph Amodeo

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Instructions for papers are very vague and does not have a marking scheme, however, is a fairly easy grader. If you read the chapters, or could easily reference them, the Ethics course was very easy. Very nice prof and understanding. Exam was take home but turned into a formal exam. Also, exam date was only given a few days before it happened.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He holds you to the highest standards when it comes to spelling and grammar yet he cannot write a single email or post that isn't chock-full of spelling and grammatical errors.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
There is zero motivation to be in his class. The instructions he gives are so vague, gives poor project feedback, and not a single post he made was free of typos or grammatical errors.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Teacher struggles to make a single post without heaps of grammatical errors. Very vague instructions and expects you to know what he's looking for in the work without stating it. Marking scheme is very poor and takes marks away for not mentioning terms he has in mind even when there was no instruction to do so.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Scheduled our exam 10 days before over top of my other exams (When we are suppose to fix exam schedules  2 weeks before) and now wont respond to emails

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
The class was basically based on three essays, but other than that was a great class. Joseph gave very flattering comments and overall was a very great professor.

However, the marking scheme was unclear and his spelling and grammar were odd. This didn't effect me but may be problematic for others. 

Overall great prof!