Reviews of professor Phillip Asare

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He's so disorganized. He turns a practical course into a writing-intensive one. So you'd receive an A+ if you built a useless prototype but talked about it for pages.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Aviod him. Prof. Azare shows no empathy to his students yet thinks bascially everything from his own point of view. Ironically, one of our assignment is called "Empathy Design for Engineers". But he doesn't know how to incorporate empathy into a design of a course. No idea how he get hired.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He has an untouchable ego. He doesn't answer questions and throws the question back at you, like if I knew the answer I wouldn't be asking you duh.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Unstructured course. Grading is heavily biased, as I gained 10% for a regrade. I requested another regrade due to the same TA but was unsuccessful due to Asare's ego and excuse about "equitability issues." He rounded my grade down despite 0.1% from the next GPA. Lectures were useless. Attendance was ~10/250, with many just eating in MY150 for lunch

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Prof. Phillip, or Phillip as he likes to be called, is the chilliest guy I met at Bucknell. He is such a very nice and caring person. He tries to make students learn actively; they sometimes discover things themselves. He cares about reflecting on assignments and other stuff. He would mostly introduce an idea using an activity or a game.