Reviews of professor Andrew Streett

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Streett may be good in person but online is awful. Do not take this guy online. He is dry, hard to understand, and doesn't explain anything.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Hated him for NT II and then he won me over with OT I. He is a new professor and it shows. He really wants students to learn. His process makes me want to pull my hair out, but I really learn, so I learned to respect him. Not easy. Does not fool around with late work. Lectures are snoozers. Dry humor. Quiz due before the first class.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
We had weekly quizzes, two papers, and two tests. His tests were very tricky--he asked questions that were very specific, such as the location of a particular topic in a book. Since I didn't have those particular passages committed to memory, I missed those questions. In short, he is a good lecturer and a very tough grader.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
One of the most boring and monotone professors I have ever taken. Loves hearing himself talk. Anytime someone posed a question he turned it into an argument to try and prove himself or prove his authority as a teacher. Not relatable to students, no interesting lectures, and certainly would not take him again