Reviews of professor Stephen Hancock

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Dr. Hancock is a very nice professor who truly tries his best to help all students succeed. However, he spent far too much time on prelabs leaving most of the class with insufficient time to complete the actual labs. He is not the greatest at answering emails and was extremely behind on grading for the majority of the semester.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Listen, this was his first semester ever teaching and I think he did really well. At the moment he explains things like we are kindof at his level of knowledge which can be challenging at times bc you can get lost, but once you ask him to clarify he is more than willing. He's supper nice and shoots for a class average in the 70s so we get extracred

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr.Hancock is a really good professor and genuinely cares for his students. Biochem is very hard and his exams can be really tough sometimes but he makes himself very accessible. He has a strong vocabulary which can be confusing sometimes. STUDY the learning outcomes he gives you for exams, and know his class is not an easy A, so be ready to work.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Okay, Hes very new at teaching so he explains information at his level. He also really loves biochemistry which isnt the case for most students. His test were hard to study for because there was a lot of info and a lot of detail so you didnt know were to study heavy. He has potential to be a great proff and he makes up for his mistakes.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Dr. Hancock was my best professor thus far. He now has moved to teach biochem but he made lab 10x easier. Even if you didn't have a chem background or weren't very skilled in chem, he was always willing to help and explained things clearly. Take his class if you ever get the chance. He also answers emails within the day so communication is good.