Reviews of professor Kevin Anderson

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His lectures are great, full of lots of information about canada's history, but he is monotone so can be boring. HOWEVER the TA's are some of the WORST, they have an attitude when you challenge your grade, and were on their phones the entire time of the final exam when they should have been proctoring

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I would take this class again to get humbled. The content is great but as someone who isn't a history major or arts major, I didn't know that they marked this hard. The Tas were terrible and graded harshly, giving little feedback [they asked to specify who John A. MacDonald was and to not introduce random names expecting the marker to know them]

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His lectures are a MUST ATTEND, gives so much information and no one offered notes in the discord, they were so stingy. Kevin himself was such a strict marker, take another class if you are an LWSO major.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Assigned a 35% research paper and didnt have it back before the final, the due date was 3 weeks before the final lol. We went into the final knowing 30% of our grade, final was worth 30%. Dont take this class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This class is too much work for a 300-level and way too much readings [65-70 pages a week you are tested on them through quizzes]

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I had kevin for CNST 201 and HTST 211, he was amazing, but for CNST 361 both Kevin and the TAs were awful. They all acted like they didn't want to be there and graded everything so rough.  I lost marks on my midterm for not capitalizing the names of Robert Borden, mind you... it was an in person hand written exam where we had 50 minutes.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I would take his class again just so I can nap, he is inspirational in the sense of inspiring me to never take a Canadian Studies Class again. Marks so hard for no reason, gives just shy of 70 pages of readings a week, most are dry as hell and hard to get through

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Pretty heartwarming to see all the recent reviews and I am glad I ain't alone. This class was one of the worst, in my five years at university I finally received a grade on my paper of below 75%. The teaching assistants are some of the worst, they SAT ON THEIR PHONES BLASTING TIKTOK WHILE WE WROTE THE FINAL LMAO. Kevin is okay, marks a bit hard.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
As a person who did fairly well on the assessments this class was awful, we have over 50 pages of reading a week, the midterm and paper are marked by the TAs and are done so awfully. 

I received a 90% on the midterm and my reason for losing marks was for "sentence fragments, and improper use of commas" STAY AWAY

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Kevin gives amazing lectures however his grading is just terrible, and he expects us to read 60 pages of readings a week. As someone who did well on the midterm, paper, and quizzes this class is not it, I just didn't enjoy it, especially because the midterm [short answer] and final [essay-based] were both in person handwritten.