Reviews of professor George Habek

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Not any better than in 351. The content is awesome but he has little/none RStudio knowledge - "Have you used stack overflow?" Poor grading criteria/standards. The quizzes are full of pretty dumb questions. He is also fairly arrogant and refuses to answer questions close to deadlines. The only redeeming quality is that he is a lazy but easy grader.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The most unorganized professor I've had. Grading criteria/rubric is extremely vague and subjective based on the student. Writes a rubric but doesn't actually use it. When you ask for clarification on why you lost points, he literally can't explain it because he chooses random numbers to spread out the grade distribution.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He tells us we should be taking the class to learn, not for the grade, but then destroys your grade with his quizzes and tests. He doesn't follow his rubric and won't answer any questions you have about the projects. If you're ever wondering which professor he is, look for the guy walking down the halls who looks like Shrek. Avoid taking him!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He asks you to do a large amount of work, then he will skim over your projects looking for certain things in order to remove points from your grade. Grading criteria the least specific I have ever witnessed, he grades with an arbitrary subjective viewpoint that no other human can comprehend. Feedback/communication is lackluster at best. Good luck.