Reviews of professor John Park

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I enjoyed this class. I found the material very interesting, and the lectures were helpful. Study the lecture material, take notes, etc. and you'll do fine. I didn't think the tests were too hard, and this class was not stressful for me. Decent workload for an online class. Would recommend.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
In PHIL6, you will not pass unless you attend the lectures. The readings were really hard for me to understand so the only way I was able to comprehend the material was through Professor Park's lectures. Overall, if you are willing to participate and put in the work then you should pass this class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He is impolite. Reading will be required of you, and you will be lost if you cannot comprehend old English. I would never enroll in this course with him once more. He assists, but not to the extent that you would require. The reading quizzes are the only method available for earning credit.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The Professor is respectful and helpful when it comes to understand the lecture.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Don't take if you can avoid. Crazy ego problem. You must call him "Doctor." He asks you to argue against philosophers who have been around hundreds of years and then marks you down if he can think of a counter argument to your argument. If I could out-argue Aristotle they would probably be studying me and not Aristotle. He is extremely un-flexible.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He is an extremely tough grader on assignments. Don't take this class because he is very rude. His lecture videos are a bit confusing and outdated. I did not enjoy this class at all. I regret taking him, because I actually enjoy philosophy. He belittles students and responds to you as if you are beneath him.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Listen to his videos and add notes to his outlines.  Online discussions are tedious. He required two specific argumentative discussion posts weekly. His lecturesare the most helpful.    His two midterms and final exams were mult choice/fill blank.  He grades hard, and I would say unfairly, on papers. That's why he isn't rated "awesome." haha

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor was not bad, quiz every class on the reading and lectures were good.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Solid class nothing too special.  Just do the readings or read online summaries of the reading and the class was a breeze.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Terrible teacher overall, lectures feel like him just projecting his own philosophical ideals onto philosophical subjects. Has a high ego and is condescending. Be warned if you are late to class by 3 minutes  and you miss the daily quiz in those minutes, he will not let you makeup those points and say "oh well".(each worth like 2% of ur grade)