Reviews of professor Adam Zimmerman

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Overcomplicates simple topics. Avoid.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Zimmermans class is hard but he makes it enjoyable and clearly cares about his students well being.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Professor Zimmerman provided us with real world application so some very complicated topics. He brought waffles to review sessions, and gave out money to show how class actions are settled. Truly my favorite class so far. If you pay attention in class, and really engage with the material his exams mirror the practice you do in class.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Zim really cares about the students. His lectures are all based on working with the material rather than actually teaching it - instead of just throwing out rules, he'll provide an example in the real world. Endlessly entertaining and energetic - pleasure to be in class with. Exam had one weird section, but overall was fair.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
This professor's method of teaching is incredibly annoying.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
TORTS FALL 22 - His lectures are loopy and overdone. He needs to slow down and focus more on the actual law that he will test us on, rather than just spraying us with confusing and lengthy hypos that only cause confusion. I hate to leave this bad review but I feel many of my fellow classmates would concur. Should restructure his way of teaching.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Amazing professor! He truly cares about all of his students and makes your first year of law school seem less scary. He uses great hypos to help us understand difficult concepts and makes lectures entertaining and fun.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
(Torts) He overcomplicates things.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Incredibly smart but also incredibly unclear when it comes to conveying the material to students.