Reviews of professor Pulin Mondal

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The lectures were extremely boring, with slide decks reaching 80-90 slides. His online tests are time-consuming and there's no way to go back a question. He tells you allocate appropriate time for each question does not explain how to do that without seeing all question at once. The final project idea is good, but the execution could be way better

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I had a feeling that Dr. Mondal's mission is to make everyone's life harder. The course organization was questionable with a lot of due dates and placeholder submissions. The Draft Final Report was due 3 weeks before the Final report and the only difference was the inclusion of Literature Review. He loves to interrupt students when they speak.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
He asks you during the course to be professional when he organized the course in an unorganized and vague way.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
90% of these reviewers didn't attend class or didn't communicate. Professor Mondal asks how we're doing and I'd respond but no one would unless in chat. I had urgent matters and needed extensions and he would give the whole class extentions. He also makes exams have a low percentage to help us and honestly it's so stress relieving, he's a good man.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Detailed course content. Predictable lecture patterns.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The most unorganized course I have ever taken and it's all because of Pulin Mondal. He is always mad for some reason and his lectures are incredibly boring. Whenever students present to the class , he always cuts them off. He does not allow us to properly manage our time during tests by preventing us from going back and forth between questions.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Prof. Mondal is very nice. He tried his best t make this course interesting. you have to attend the lectures because he talks about real life examples. The midterm was fair, the assignments were not difficult but long. The exam was fair

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
All the classes he teaches do not provide students with useful learning experiences. He should not be a professor and that is a general consensus. Incompetent, but holds everyone up to some ridiculous standards and not lenient at all. Provides unclear instructions and gives you a bad mark when you literally check every box on HIS rubric