Reviews of professor Patricia Lagarde

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Boring and repetitive lectures. Quizzes are easy but her grading on exams is hard and subjective. The journals are also stupid assignment's who's most challenging aspect is the walk to the printers. Boring class could've learned more "art history" on wikipedia.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I don't know why she has bad reviews. She's a good professor that is caring and the class is interesting. Easy A, the quizzes are very easy and the exams just require some light studying. She's engaging and very knowledgable. I would take her again!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
extremely nit-picky grader. got a 5 on the ap art history exam yet constantly received b's. rambles on about minor details of artworks that no rational person could possibly care about, then expects you to regurgitate her lectures on the exams.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
A great course with many discussion posts and fun art assignments to do. Exams are fairly easy and you don't have to read the textbook much if you watch the lectures, but you still need the books for assignments. There is usually 1-2 assignments a week.