Reviews of professor Stephanie Waterman

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Very fair and organized class. As long as you utilize the lecture slides, those slides give all the information needed for midterms, finals, and quizzes. She had group portions in tests to boost marks and dropped the worst one. She is always available outside of class to answer questions and very fair. Instructor's notes and lectures were useful.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Great prof! Nothing bad to say here; this was a great course. The well-organized content and the prof combined made it the best of my term.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Had her as an online prof and you can tell she cares about and loves what she does but the lectures moved so fast it was hard to absorb all the info, you def need a break after 1 lecture before going to another. Participation and worksheets are 5% so honestly just do the quizzes and try and absorb the information yourself then use vids for extra.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Lots of assignments to be marked on so easy to do well. Not the best lecturer in my opinion but easy class if you put in the time to understand the concepts

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Super easy exam Q's. GPA booster. Nice prof as well.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Stephanie was my favourite prof last semester. She's so passionate about what she teaches and does it with so much eloquence. Grades are divided between midterms, weekly online quizzes, clicker, some bonus assignments and the final. Midterm and final formats were identical so you always knew what to expect. Couldn't say enough good things about her

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
She teaches because she needs to. There is no chance for you to reach her for help after lectures. The TA is the only reason the course avg is so high. TAs are the same in the first term with Roger so might as well take him if you need EOSC112. The prof is from MIT and oh my god if she can get into MIT lmao pigs can fly.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Dr. Waterman is a great lecturer, and you can tell she really cares about her students and the material. The reason that I'm giving her 3 stars is that she repeatedly talked about Columbus and George Vancouver in a positive way (Even during a land acknowledgement) and didn't respond when multiple students told her that was not appropriate...

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Overall teaching was okay, class was fairly easy. Just be prepared for her to say "alright" over 500 times in one lecture. She says "alright" so repetitively that it's the only thing I remember from a lecture sometimes.