Reviews of professor Daniel Eness

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Mr. Eness is highly knowledgeable about tech. document writing, however, has great difficulty communicating with students. For most assigments the students had little idea what was being asked of them to do, and in lecture, Eness would ramble on about unimportant things. Class structure is 2 days lecture, 1 day work time. Fight for your grade. GL

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
DO NOT TAKE ANY CLASS WITH THIS MAN. The first day of class he told us that he still sucks at teaching after 6 year. He is the most long winded teacher I have ever had and over shares about his life. It is so uncomfortable and does not to pertain to the work we are doing in class. Also the Canvas page has more information then he does.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Eness gave great feedback, but was somewhat inaccessible outside of class. It was hard to get a response through email, specifically. His feedback on papers was specific and helpful and the range of material covered in the course is pretty well-rounded.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Grading criteria was very confusing but a quick email would clear it up. Lectures were confusingly created, but once you got used to it, it was fine. Group project at the end which I am never a fan of. Two main projects overall and you do it in parts throughout discussions which helps out. He was not a fast grader, took a while for all of it

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
There is no clear guidance on what to do for assignments, you basically have to go off the examples & then what other students help you with. Takes a long time grading, so when the next assignment comes, you do not know how you should change. This class also has nothing to do with reports.