Reviews of professor Luis Rizo

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Worst professor ever. Literally just reading slides and not even helping with the problems we encounter. He missed one of my assignments on his so called email submission and told me it was my fault that he didn't see it. All tests are handwritten and he will ask computer history than actual problem. Avoid him please. Prevention is better than cure

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
for those who are new to LaGuardia bro i swear this is the worst professor you can ever take a class with, he does NOT care about the students grades  and he is super TOUGH GRADER , if you new in computer major you will fail his class 90% , and if you got lucky and passed you would pass with ZERO knowledge simply because he only reads the handouts

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
It may not seem like a good class in the beginning but if you read the handouts he gives you and do the work, you'll be fine. He may seems like a tough grader but you can make it out better, just do the work and listen to what he says in class.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Winter short session class  lectures and hw's piling up faster than usual. Amount of hw's given on regular session was the same as this short 6-week. I mean like 10 problems/chp, advanced lab-type problems . He would fly over 2 chp per week . He's lectures are long and dense but, he breaks them down pretty well. Respectful, but expects you work.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Not good at all

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Yes, he has a lot of homework, but computer science is a hand on major. He cares about our skill learning. He coded proficiently in class. Only thing is students need to get prepared when you go to class, like reading the book at home first.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
He assigns huge amounts of hw for one week before the first exam that covers like nine chapters. This is insane. Who has the time to complete all of the assignments in one week. We got other stuff we gotta do in life. He needs to assign small amounts of hw. Overall he is an alright/average professor. He seems like a drill sargent with assigning hw

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Okay this will be last one. I just remembered that he doesn't give you any sort of review at all for tests. He said and I quote "by now you should know if your answer is correct" for the older tests. I have to say it again, but in my eyes, thats just abysmal. I really hope he'd change his teaching style one day. He can if he puts some care into it.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The professor explains pretty good, but he never let students explain some ideas, he think he never made a mistake. He sent a lot of projects and quizzes, and he started grading the projects only 3 days before final grades. When he uploaded final grades, a lot of students wanted to check all the grades which he never post, but he never answered.