Reviews of professor Joshua Smart

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Good luck on the midterms.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Smart can keep talking on and on, the wording of his exams are often unclear, and overall, it is a little too difficult to get an A for a GE. That being said, he is accessible outside of class and does create some helpful group activities to reinforce concepts.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Everyday feels like its his first day teaching. His lectures are easy to understand and he goes over the material if you ask him, but there is no questions to be ask because the material is easy. When it comes to the exams, he makes the exams extremely hard for no reason.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Dr. Smart cant teach to save his life. His lectures are long and boring, his exams are unnecessarily difficult because of the vague and tricky questions he asks not to mention the tough grading. He also has a no screen policy that is HEAVILY enforced. If you can, avoid him at all costs.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Worst prof ever! All that effort and got an E.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Decent amount of reading, but if you take notes using his study guides the quizzes are pretty easy. Exams are kind of difficult for a GE, but you have a pretty good idea of what he's going to ask if you go to class. While he isn't the best at communicating it, Dr. Smart does care for his students and does seem to know a lot about philosophy/ethics.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His lectures aren't clear, his test questions are vague sometimes. Hardest GE I've taken so far. His teaching method isn't developed, but he has good intentions. He's very dedicated in philosophy but not the best at communicating.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is such a boring professor and the exams are very hard. He makes lectures over material that take at most 1 hour of readings last 4-5 lectures, while barely even evaluating the material even more. The classroom was super hot so it was not helpful when trying to learn in class (not his fault). I would recommend staying away from him at all cost

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The concepts weren't explained very well in class, but he had office hours during finals to clarify concepts. I hope he gets better with presenting material in his future classes.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I don't know why he makes questions the way he does, you can literally debate with him your answer. He allows that! That's all I have to say.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is not a bad professor by any means and he is willing to go the extra mile for students and has fun lectures - that being said, he grades very hard for no reason on the exams. The questions are vague and confusing ... very tricky. If you pay attention and kind of try you'll get a B, but if you want an A you will have to work very hard.