Reviews of professor Raymond Davidson

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
First let me get out the positives that i want him to contiue. I feel nice there was no late work policy, , all the DQs were reviewed the final day of the module, but not my missing quizes and paper. He never responds to emails and doesn't explain his slyallubs at the beginning, when i got back from MLK break I missed two quizes that cost 7% grade

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Subject matter is challenging. The online format was well planned and required minimal effort to navigate. I wouldn't call it an easy A, but it should eb an easy B if you understand the basics of writing. 15 week course was simple, Week 1 is DQ and Paper, Week 2 is quiz. No midterms or final. No grades or feedback given until the very end.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Took this class because it was a requirement. Very simple you're given your work to complete you have to show you care a little to get it done and act like you care. Professor was a very hard grader as if every student has interest in philosophy. Gives you feedback . I got through the class because I did my work.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Horrible, DO NOT TAKE THIS CLASS. His lectures are NUTS. You will not learn ANYTHING. The quiz is will confuse you and difficult to pass , although you study hard. Worst Professor EVER. The class over for a week now and we still do not have grades for approximately 8 assignments. HE MAKES IT DIFFICULT, PURPOSELY.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
His lecture videos consist only of him reading his own notes. His discussion questions are unnecessarily vague with no clear objective. Its nearly impossible to understand and answer them. His quiz questions are ABSOLUTELY impossible to answer. Luckily he doesn't grade essays so harshly, or else his class would have been my lowest grade.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Professor Davidson is one of the worst online professors Ive ever had. Not only are his lectures all over the place & seriously distorted, his discussion questions are impossible to do due to the wording that only people with PhDs in ethics can understand. He doesnt believe in giving anyone 100s for their grade. Quizzes are IMPOSSIBLE to answer

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I hated this class. The lectures had too much on each slide and were in paragraph form, not bullets. He would read word for word from the powerpoints and not explain them in simpler terms. I spent more time googling half of the words he used in the lectures that I did learning. DO NOT TAKE!

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I took him for phil of science and he was great! The lectures were clear and concise and if I had any problems, he was easy to contact n replied so fast. He isn't super strict on deadlines, especially if you speak w/him about anything you have going on. I'm not the best writer n still got good grades on my papers. Overall good class and professor!