Reviews of professor Scott Johnson

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This is not a professional class with the structure it needs and there are to many false allegations of cheating. This is the worst class I have had out of  my 4 years at uta.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
One of the easiest classes for INSY majors. I took his 5-week course during summer. While the professor can go off topic at some points, the professor really does care about his students and respond fast via email. The exam reviews are clear and would point out what is going to be on every exam the class prior. Definitely recommend.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Drop if he's your professor. Absolutely awful. Brags and gives political opinions as if they're fact. His lectures are just basically him rambling with tons of tangents and breaks for him to tell class how cool he is and how much money he has made. Exam questions are EXTRAORDINARILY poorly worded. There are several on each exam that make 0 sense.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I took a 5 week summer course and it was pretty fun. The professor recently changed up the curriculum this summer and had our class test it. The tests were very easy if you come to lectures, as he points out what will be on the exam. The lectures themselves were interesting though they were two hours long. Overall, easy A+ if you are an INSY major

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
This teacher talks way too much about his several jobs he had and how he basically invented so many things we use now. He talks way too fast and doesn't give us time to write down all of the notes. I would never take him again! Worst professor, he needs to retire now.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures are so boring, but attendance is 4% of your final grade. His class consists of him writing vocabulary on the board and telling you a simplified definition. You have three assignments due at the end of each week and most of the time have unclear directions. You will do fine on the exams if you study his reviews.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I took Insy 3303. He's not as bad as people are saying. If you are not much of a reader then I highly advise going to his lecture and take notes because he will make the things that don't make sense, make ALOT of sense. I also advise making index cards for the test reviews. His test are straight forward and mostly just asking what a term is.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is a very respectful and genuine person. However as a professor you can find better options. The projects he assigns are difficult and does not talk about it in class. He talks about using the textbook for the class, but you can get by with his lectures. overall his teachings are pretty decent but as for assignments and exams I recommend studyin

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His lectures are very long and boring. He goes off-topic and the study guides he posts are not helpful for the exam for the most part. 50-question exams, no extra credit nor curves. Most of the time you have three assignments per week. He allows no technology therefore be prepared to take notes by hand. Attendance is mandatory and he's strict.