Reviews of professor Daniel Cherdack

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Not a bad professor given the topic, but not the best either. Physics in of itself is difficult and if you're not caught up to date in any lecture, you'll be paying the price for it. Will go in depth to help understand a problem but sometimes too in depth. He's got inconsistently good lectures, definitely a trial and error guy.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Most students wrote cherdack out the first couple of weeks. He's a new professor and it showed, he messed up problems and was nervous. However he really came through in the end with the in class problems, posting lectures online, and curving our test grade.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
HE IS PROBABLY THE MOST CONSIDERATE PHYSICS PROFESSOR. HE POSTS NOTES AFTER CLASS, PROVIDE ANSWERS TO PREVIOUS TESTS AND PRACTICE TESTS, HE UPLOADS EXAM REVIEW SLIDES TO HELP STUDY. PHYSICS IS A REALLY DIFFICULT CLASS BUT HE TRIES HIS BEST. YOU JUST NEED TO STUDY A LITTLE HARDER THAN YOUR OTHER CLASSES, AND UNDERSTAND THE ANSWERS TO THE HOMEWORK

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
University physics is hard no matter who you're taking. However, this professor has boring lectures, but is always lending a helping hand during his office hours. The curve is very generous, and this explains that he wants us to learn something, even if we do get many questions wrong on our exams. You will pass even though you fail the tests.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
His examples in class are on exams. He's open to a lot of office hours. He gives A LOT of extra credit and tries to make the grade distribution as even as possible. He curves a lot and is the most generous grader I have ever known. He tries his best to grade you based off of your knowledge rather than unreliable exams. Great professor.