Reviews of professor John Mohr

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I took Prof Mohr because my friends recommended him. However, he changed from last semester to now. He grades harder than English professors. I get Bs for about 3 grammar mistakes which I felt was pretty self explanatory even though the information was correct and fit the guidelines. Other than his harsh, unnecessary grading the class was not hard

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Mohr graded the writing assignments very tough and would take off for things that came out of no where, he did not give a rubric so students do not know what is expected out of them. Attendance is mandatory and you are expected to turn in a doc note if necessary. He treats his students like middle schoolers and has an attitude had the time.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
As an engineering major with no interest in history, this class was perfect. Never heard from Mohr except when I contacted about a faulty grade (he was super helpful). Weekly homework that you can get a 100 on with your eyes closed, 2 very easy short papers plus two short papers as "exams". If you want to actually learn history, he's not for you.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
One of my favorite teachers. He is very lenient in grading and you don't have to be good at English to pass. Very unbiased historian and he teaches you about some of the more niche things in history you wouldn't usually know.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I took HY103 online and it was complete disaster. You dont learn anything. The class is just reading a bunch of assigned readings from an online textbook and then taking a few quizzes. Youre supposed to write multiple papers which are graded by the teachers assistant and rather than focusing on content takes off points for grammar and spelling.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is not bad overall, but I would not take his class again. Homework was short learning quizzes, map quizzes, and a journal every week. However, the object responses and exams were graded more on slight grammar errors which bring your grade down a whole letter grade even if all the information is accurate.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He has great lectures and is a cool guy. Homework is not bad, but there is a ton of writing. It is basically an English class with History lectures.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Solid professor that loves what he does!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Class is 25% "learning curves / map quizzes" (easy, did all in 1 day), 15% research paper (1), 10% attendance (had 3 UA, got a 100%), 25% mid-term, 25% final exam. Midterm and final exam require 2, 4-600 word essays from a list of 5 prompts. Class resources only (no google). Go to class, dude likes to be heard. Didn't take a single note all year.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He is a good teacher in that he knows his history, but the curriculum is set in a way that you cant rescue your grade if you mess up early.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Slides clearly detailed what he lectured about in class, though I had to pay attention to the lecture to get all the details. Very good speaker, was lenient with my grade. Would take again.