Reviews of professor Jill Corraini

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Great teacher! Very knowledgeable, good lecturer, interesting examples, uses in class participation on D2L in place of quizzes often. Quizzes are simple 5-10 questions on D2L, factual Analysis is the only assignments and they take like 1/2h on D2L - she gives written feedback on every factual analysis. Very textbook/vocab heavy. Def recommend!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Isn't clear for what she wants when she marks, reads the textbook for the classes. Never gives examples and never uses the whiteboard. She would be a better teacher is this was online....

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Jill is great, but be ready to read the required material as well as going to class every time. Her exams are at a normal university level, but be sure not to cram the night before the exam because there is a lot of information. Her case studies offer various angles from which to attack them. Overall I really like her class!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
There is no need to evaluate with such low grades, even though she can tell you that you have done a good job...??
I don't understand why they say she is an excellent teacher if she only reads the power point... it's nothing spectacular
Honestly, it's one of the worst.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Won't help if you ask but will keep giving poor grades with good comments

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Beware. Jill is difficult. Her lectures are straight from the textbook and she adds in stuff that is so unnecessary. She was unclear on what she wanted and was not helpful when you asked her. She treats you like law students and that you should know things when this is an intro to law. The one good thing I'd say is her assignments are a good review

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Her quizzes are relatively straight forward as long as you read over her slides, the same goes with the assignment she assigns (Factual analysis). This will be an easy class as long as you attend her classes where she has participation assignments/marks where she'll look over your work but not mark. The Midterm and Final were both open book.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
A nice and personally understanding instructor. She knows her stuff. However the course itself requires a lot of reading (often the lecture notes are adequate to do well on the quizzes) and not many assignments or practice with the material to really ingrain it. She's very unclear how case studies should be completed, too.