Reviews of professor Chuck Meitner

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He supposes that everyone knows the process of QFP 325 well. He never reminds us the deadline of the assignment and never gives us rubric. You need to check Canvas very often. For the group projects and individual evaluation, you always lose bunch of points but you don't know why. I can't feel he has the feature as a professor in a college.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I usually never feel the need to review a professor but in this case it must be done. QFP was one of the worst experiences Ive ever had at UW Stout and its due too chuck. There were days where wed have expired product in the walk in on production day and days wed try to meet up with him and hed blow us off. Avoid taking, he should be fired.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Normally I don't have a problem with any professor, but I feel that this needs to be known. This professor has one mindset and isn't open to new ideas. QFP sounded great until a few weeks into the class. Almost everything my group made was seen as garbage and he didn't give any suggestions.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He grades heavily on English grammar. 2 discussion weekly and require responses. Asks for reflection paper after each module and there are six modules. Overall, responsible lecturer but heavy workload.