Reviews of professor Jeffrey Stuewig

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I am not sure at all why he does not have higher ratings! Yes, the PowerPoints can be boring but he makes sure you understand information, he is very passionate about research and he's overall a great professor!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He is a good professor. hes not the best, bc he doesnt go in detail with examples and doesnt make the class interact. but his lectures are very through, always ask questions. i didnt touch the book once during the class and dropped this stats class before, but having him made me come out with an A. attend the lectures, attend review sessions.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He's nice, but the class is extremely lecture-heavy and the textbook actually helped me learn more than his class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Nice guy, Terrible professor. Let's just say you walk into class he reads the slides and you walk out. Most of my classmates (including myself ) just stopped attending it was redundant. Test like every other class and pop quiz like every other week. Textbook but we never used it. Never assigned us homework, kind of like every man for themselves

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
THIS REVIEW IS FOR PSYC 380. Easy class, multiple attempts to take the quiz. Project is a 15-min podcast on HIS choice of topic for you, LOTS of discussions, few errors in the quizzes themselves (right answers were wrong but he corrects them if you tell him about the error), he was responsive in emails. Overall good class, would recommend.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
You wanna truly understand PSYCH Stat and have a patient professor who will literally work with you???????? Take Jeff's class. Thank me later

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Regression is a hard class. But he is very good. Tests were open notes and we had some quizzes that were closed book. There's also one group project. You will learn a lot.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures are posted on BB and professor basically just goes over it. He provided extra credit on exams and quizzes. Textbook was "required" but you really don't need it. He does make sure everyone understands the criteria and always ask if anyone needs help. He's lectures are monologued, he does provide examples most of time and syllabus was clear.