Reviews of professor Timeko McFadden

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She assigns weekly readings that are heavy and you have to get the textbook for this class. Order it asap because the library ran out but we were still expected to complete these readings. Her overall instructions were never clear. She was very particular about things but it was difficult to understand what she wanted.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof. was not the worst, but not the best. She can be unclear with assignment expectations while wanting things that are very specific to her. The grade is based on two essays worth 15 points each, participation, and the midterm and final. Take this class if you enjoy the social topics and are good at writing; if not, it will be a struggle.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
She's nice and makes the class somewhat enjoyable, but that doesn't make up for the overly tough grading and amount of reading assigned.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Class was discussion based with 2 papers, 2 tests, & a project, not graded harshly. Prof. is unprofessional and rude grad student who had specific expectations for our work but incredibly unclear instructions. She was generally frustrated when students would ask for clarification. Class was decently interesting and not hard but prof. was terrible.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Unnecessarily harsh grader and generally unprofessional PHD student. Would not recommend for an undergraduate class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Class requires very heavy reading. Professor is rude and unprofessional- definitely would not recommend this course with her. The issues spoken about were very interesting. the fascinating material, however, was overshadowed by Mcfaddens behavior as a professor. Unclear instructions, picky rubrics, and ridiculous amounts of outside reading.