Reviews of professor San Patten

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Almost everyone complained that they didn't have enough time on the midterm, and requested that the TA mention it to her. Now, the final is twice the length with the same amount of time per question. Super boring lectures, annoying papers to write, insanely hard to get a good grade.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Seemed knowledgeable about her own field of health, however not as much about in-depth sustainability if it didn't intersect with that field. Did have a good understanding of social intersectionality and perspectives.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Her lectures were pretty messed up. There were bullet points on her slides, but more often than not they would be pretty incoherent. She would also give random examples or facts and spend 10 sec or so on it but happen to put them in the exams. In the exams you could also clearly tell which questions were made by her by how vague they were.