Reviews of professor Stephen Fullmer

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I took Writing 150 online and he was my instructor and I was not impressed at all. Grading seemed arbitrary and the feedback he wrote was impossible to read. During the last month of the semester he went ghost mode not grading anything until the week that final grade submissions were due. All those last assignments had points knocked randomly.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
If you'd like to waste your tuition or be graded on criteria the professor didn't teach, he's your man! Most of the time he answered questions by saying, "just look it up online." He frequently took points off assignments for criteria he never taught and didn't outline in class. Horrendously organized class, literally such a waste of my life.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This is one of the worst professors I've ever had. I haven't seen such arrogance on display in a classroom before. And if you disagree with him or write something he doesn't like, watch out! He even seemed to insinuate that he was willing to physically fight another student. I witnessed this. It happened. He made students feel unsafe.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Fullmer has a great personality that has everyone wanting to come to class.He is a little disorganized but not to the point where it affects our learning. Understanding, funny,  I enjoy his lectures. Uses mostly hard copies( printed work vs online)-easier for essay workshops. Easy readings and homework aside from the 4 or so essays in the semester

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Fullmer is awesome. The books he assigns to read are chosen specifically to teach certain skills. He is patient with students, and has lots of really good observations on the texts. He acts a little bit disorganized, but he does know what he's doing.