Reviews of professor Matt DeStefano

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This class was hard and very easy at the same time. The discussion posts were worth 33.3% of your final grade ( easy points), the quizzes another 33.3% ( they were hard) and the last 33.3% of your grade comes from a paper.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
The class consists of a paper, discussion posts, and quizzes. The discussion posts and quizzes were easy, but the paper was hard since he doesn't have a grading criteria. He just gives you instructions which is frustrating, but you get a chance to edit your paper if you want to. Wouldn't recommend since this class wasn't interesting either.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Matt DeStefano is not a bad person, he is just very busy with his own stuff as a grad student and takes his time to respond to emails and grade stuff which can be very frustrating. His quizzes are super hard but he does drop stuff and gives extra credit opportunities. Not too bad but not the best either. An A is achievable if you put the work.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The class is broken up into three areas: quizzes, discussion posts and the final paper. The quizzes were fairly difficult, even if you understand the material, because it is philosophy. The discussion posts are graded for completion so you never get any real feedback on your work which leaves you stranded. The paper is directionless, very hard,