Reviews of professor Eric Knyt

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Knyt is passable and honestly pretty funny sometimes. These courses seem very standardized and exam-oriented, and the exam themselves closely follow the books content. I dont think Knyt could be any worse than any other available professor. Study the harder problems from the text and use outside resources, and you will be fine.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Most pointless class. Eric is nice, but there is SO much miscommunication between him and the 'chair' and thats the most stressful part because you never know what to expect. The hw is nothing like the exams and the lectures are next to pointless. It is only helpful when eric goes over the practice exams. No idea why this class is required for KIN.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He uses powerpoint slides which are just the most important information from the textbook and he may do one or two examples on his own. He's not bad, but I wouldn't say he is amazing. The discussion and review sessions were more useful than the class in terms of understanding the information. Class is mandatory, but he does post the slides online.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Eric Knyt is not the best lecturer. He gets lost in his own work and doesn't really know what he's talking about. All he does is sit at the desk and read word for word from the slides that he puts online. Not helpful at learning. If you take math 131 do not take eric.