Reviews of professor Walter Seaman

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Seaman is a goof. Knowledgeable, but does not know how to teach effectively. I attended 90% of lectures, and I can honestly say I learned more Latin than I did math. Although he claimed there would be a curve, there was not one. At least not a significant curve anyways. C fell between 72% and 77%. His lectures are also straight out of the textbook.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Rambles on in lecture and scrolls through the textbook on a projector without actually teaching anything. The only reason I would say attending lecture is mandatory is because he randomly does clicker questions for in class credit. Homework, discussion activities, and practice tests are where you will learn all the material for this class.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Did not talk about the topics on the homework, and frequently went on tangents that were unrelated and barely decipherable. Does not respond to emails and did not seem to care about any of my struggles or me when I talked to him.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Was incredibly difficult to understand and did not lecture about anything on the homework or tests.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
VERY test heavy, tests were out of 10 points so one wrong is already a 90%. Nice guy, but very confusing lectures

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
His exams are the easiest I've ever taken. First class I've taken that the homework scores are bringing my grade down. Don't bother going to lectures, you won't learn anything. Basically, study the old exams and the exam you will have is just a mixture of old exam questions. They are all the exact same wording and numbers.