Reviews of professor Rebecca Pearce

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Easy and light course as long as you do your work you'd you get a decent grade. Professor was kind and easy to talk to if you ever needed anything. I don't understand the low ratings she has gotten, prob from students who don't do their work ..

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Dr. Pearce was very knowledgable when teaching the course. However, the lecture portion of this course seemed extremely unnecessary, especially when we reviewed the same material in lab. A good participation grade is easy to obtain if you attend class, and the feedback given by her is reasonable and helpful.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Honestly felt bad for her cause the lecture portion was stuff we all pretty much knew already and everyone was only there because we had to be for the attendance points. The course is dead easy though and she's nice.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Pearce is kind if u actualy put in effort. please just read the rubric carefully, do all the work like not last minute, and, i cant stress this enough, visit office hours, especially the main TA thats in charge of ur lab time. ask lots of questions to ensure ull get things right, whether thats lab worksheets or the poster drafts, drafts weigh alot.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Lectures are boring and seem like common sense, but easiest bio class I've ever taken. As long as your group produces good work you'll get an A. Class is more focused on the lab portion which made the lecture seem pointless

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Dr. Pearce teaches the lecture portion of 115. There isn't much to say since the content is light and we met once a week for an hour. She did a good job presenting her material but it was hard to listen at times as she would typically read off the slides. That's just the nature of 115 though. Could improve lecture portion of class - lab was cool.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
shes like fine. shes pretty boring but its a stupid easy class so

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Me and my group mate had written a very similar answer for an assignment. But when we received the grades back I received half credit and he got full credit, but we both got the same exact feedback. I emailed this professor about it, and she refused to check the grades and insisted it was graded correctly.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Class is super easy and foundational compared to CHEM106 but the structure of things is very vague, you're left to fend for yourself because the slides + instructions given to complete assignments don't have a lot of information (especially the rubrics). the lecture portion is a joke but participation matters.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Dr. Pearce's lectures are kind of boring, but I feel like that is just the nature of the class. The class was not too hard overall, but make sure your papers are good quality if you want to do well, the grading is kind of harsh.