Reviews of professor Simon Rondeau-Gagne

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
GAs are completely useless & cannot answer chem basic questions. They constantly mark the midterms incorrectly. First year this is a cumulative exam therefore no complete practice exams. Simon is not a great teacher and likes to belittle his students during class, makes it hard to like the guy. Dodges questions in class and never comes back to them

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Gagne is a great guy all around. His lectures cover everything he will ever ask and were enjoyable to attend. His midterms were a bit challenging, but there were no surprises, and could be solved with what you learned. If you put in the effort, it is easy to do well in class. Definitely would take a class with him again.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
He is a great guy overall I have nothing against him, but LET ME TELL YOU the midterms will crush you and bring your grade down in flames. Practice midterms are practically a joke compared to the real midterm. Be sure to keep up every day and stay ahead. Would'nt take it again!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
2 Exams(50%),1 final(35%),1 assignment(15%)His lectures r great on their own no textbook needed,BUT bad handwriting&slight accent.Go to class.Learn theory behind non-mechanism topics.Half of exam is pure application of mechanisms&half of exam is taking a theory and asking u to use it in a dif context than what was taught.Beware,he is sassy.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Marking scheme is harsh sometimes but MT2 generously curved accordingly, fair prof. Virtually everything came in the same style as lec. questions, with few tricks. If you put in work, it translates pretty well to exams. His passion is obvious, and lectures alone were sufficient. MAKE SURE U GO TO EXAM VIEWING, a lot of marks can be got back here!