Reviews of professor Kim Icreverzi

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Get ready to read! There's so many reading assigned and if you ask her about anything, you will only get more confused. Her instructions for paper are not clear and you have two midterm papers and a final paper, which is kind of heavy.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
For an introductory class, I felt this was unnecessarily hard. Very philosophical and readings were often, long, and tedious. I reached out to Prof Icreverzi for help a couple times, and she only gave me vague, unhelpful suggestions. Also was very rude in class if you asked a "bad question." Do not take this if you're looking for a DEI.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She is passionate about the course; that is unquestionable. Problem is she expects too much from students. Most took this class for P/NP yet she wanted everyone to treat it as if it were our major course. She assigns too many readings and movies. She also wants us to BUY all of the books and bring them to class. Not too strict a grader, though.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Not an easy A but I learned so much in this class. Lots of reading but you're not expected to memorize anything just to be familiar with main concepts. I skimmed almost every article, showed up to class, payed attention and I got an A.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
For the first half of the quarter, I had no idea what was going on because her explanations of definitions and concepts made no sense. Class was solely lectures which failed to make it engaging, and the readings are very long and tended to be dry. However, after the first test, I understood a little more and things became more interesting.