Reviews of professor Kristina Wagstrom

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
The only good thing about this class is that there are no exams, and if you put the work in you will get an A. She is such a force with resubmissions, which is hilarious considering no one learned a single thing in this course because her "teaching" is hysterical. If you thought 2103 was bad, get ready for the sequel to that trainwreck.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
She uses tokens and other crap in her class. What the hell am I paying for, a game night that never ends? She does not know how to teach a college level course and should be moved to elementary school to use her tokens. It sucked that she was the only professor to teach those course. 0/10

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Hardest part of this class are the projects. Make sure you have friends who are extremely smart and can tell you how to do the projects. If one thing is slightly wrong with a project, she will make you resubmit the project after corrections. Dont take this class if you dont have to. This is a weeder and your only hope is smart friends/good TAs.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The class is a boatload of material and the class flies by but her lectures are very nice and you learn a lot from her. Also her quizzes were fair if you studied well and she even drops a quiz grade if you bomb one. She gives lots of homework but it's worth it because you learn a lot and it helps you prepare for the quizzes. Great professor.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Wagstrom is an okay professor -- she is not great but also not awful. Her grading rubric is not the best, but at least there are no tests and quizzes. I depended on the TA's for the projects. This class has an insane amount of work, and if you put the effort in you will get a good grade. Weed-out class so good luck you are going to do great!

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Dr. Wagstrom isn't a bad teacher, but this class sucks. The lecture content would've been better in freshmen engineering than senior (i.e how to write scientifically). There's way too much homework and it takes away from the design project. You get a whole other "technical presentation" that takes more time away. Many questions left unanswered.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Not great

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
This new format of kinetics was the epitome of "doin too much". I commend Dr. Wagstrom for tinkering with the course, but something in the syllabus is changing every week it seems. She knocked off one of the required advanced projects at least.