Reviews of professor Maile Arvin

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
This is Prof. Arvin's first time teaching general US history. Her grading isn't difficult if you read 45 mins before each class. Pop quizzes can be stressful, lectures cover exactly what the book went over, but can be monotone. She offered almost 10% in extra credit opportunities. She's a social justice warrior (but not often biased in lecture).

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Nice lady. Gracious with due dates and wants her students to succeed.
Besides that, I cannot express enough what a waste of time her lectures and reading are. 
Lectures are dry and awkward. Readings, while occasionally interesting, are largely biased.
Be prepared for "white man bad" to be an overarching theme in this course.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Lectures are terrible, dry, and not useful in the least. Highly recommend avoiding Arvin and taking HIST 1700 with a different professor.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Arvin is great,I can tell she puts a lot of effort into lectures. I learned a ton in this class.