Reviews of professor Annika Peter

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Peter is good, actually.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
She organized the course very well. However, the material was too focused on astronomy and not statistical mechanics. The teaching style was not good. The exams are also poorly written and depart from the main subject of the class. If you want to pass this class, use a different textbook and teach yourself.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Dr. Peter took complicated material and taught us how things work on a small scale, giving us the tools to apply the physics on a much larger scale. Her class was well organized. She encouraged us to learn together as well as brought fun into the classroom. Dr. Peter was available outside of class to help answer any questions.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Material is difficult in this course; however, it is manageable. What made the material more difficult was professor peter's inability to be able to explain anything with any level of clarity. Take someone else.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I earned a 97 in this class without any sort of curve, and Professor Peter was no help whatsoever to me. I tried going to almost every single lecture, but the unorganized mess of information just didnt work at all. Students at OSU are not receiving a good physics education, and its pretty sad honestly. I had to use the textbook for everything.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Do yourself a favor and don't let her teach you. She wouldn't let us forget that she was a theoretical physicist during her demos. Being a theoretical physicist is no excuse for being unable to communicate the info. On the quizzes, she made many errors the TA had to fix during the quiz and she included out of date references on those quizzes.