Reviews of professor Wenke Lee

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
No quizzes/tests, but homework is VERY time consuming. Project writeups are broken into tasks, with tasks assigned points out of 100 per project. Encourages open communication between students. Assignments require either a background or quick learning of network concepts. TAs were quick to respond to questions. Big time commitment!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Weird class. It was weighted so that the lectures, quizzes, and tests essentially didn't matter. So the whole grade was pretty much just projects. These projects were well written, informative, and designed well. They do a lot to nudge you in the right direction. Enjoyed doing the projects greatly, but that's pretty much all this class was.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Unresponsive over email, entire CS6262 coursework left up to TAs to manage, just like CS 6035 was.
Projects are reliant on finicky Virtual Machines running on Virtualbox. Significant time spent fighting VM issues instead of actually learning and applying network security concepts.
OMS CYBER SECURITY lacks quality of instruction expected of GATech.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
7 projects run by teams of TAs - some are OK, others were bad. Heath Murphy and Hunter Kempf were exceptionally bad. I cannot recommend as the learning experience was not worth the suffering. Their approach is based on obscurantism - comes down to you either know it, find your way through Google, or you don't get to learn!

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
tough class but you learn a lot. labs are very difficult but its worth it

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Projects are extremely demanding and time-consuming, lectures don't always explain enough for hw. Course is hard but:
> Only one exam near the end of the course
> Quizzes are open book, content directly from the lectures
> Lecture slides are extremely easy to read
> Classmates can openly discuss hw ideas
> HW heavy but low exam stress