Reviews of professor Antonio Torres

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
If you're majoring in Architecture then you don't really have a choice but to take his class. The class was very easy but he was mostly rambling on and on about one topic and it would essentially take up most of the class's time. He doesn't really explain stuff well and when asked something, he comes off as condescending.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Antonio Torrest is a tough professor. He makes students' lives miserable. I guess that what he gets paid for. Nonetheless, he worked in NYC as an architect.... which gives him "some" credibility... to make UIC Arch students' lives miserable. So... should you take him? HA. You have no choice. Good luck my dudes. #RIP

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
The reviews make it seem like he's bad- he's not. ARCH151 is a breeze & an intro to architecture. He teaches about buildings, technology etc. These are things you'll pick up in the next two semesters anyway, which is why people hated the class (boring/busy-work), but it's better to have this class than to be dunked into cold water with ARCH105.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I did not have a bad experience with Professor Torres, but the lectures were a burden. There were many tutorials performed by the assistant students, but it seemed as a waste of time. The class was mandatory, and it was easy to pass, but every lecture has a homework assignment for it. Even when there is a guest lecturer, you have to do a worksheet.