Reviews of professor Julie Nance

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Professor Nance is a very nice lady and seems to genuinely enjoy what she does, but her class and teaching is lacking. Lectures rarely ran for the full time, she does not explain new concepts well, and takes a significant amount of time to grade tests and assignments. She is a good person, but I would recommend avoiding her classes!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I had never taken a nutrition class before this semester, and Prof Nance has made the class engaging, interesting, and understandable. That being said, there is a decent amount of homework and essays, and outside work is required if you want to do well. Overall, though, she is very passionate and knowledgeable about the subject material.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Prof Nance is super nice and caring, responds to students quickly, v considerate. The class itself is pretty standard, I didn't get the book and did fine, the exams you really need to prepare for, though. Don't just study the study guide but everything on the slides. Gives EC if you ask for it, and is very friendly. Appreciates discussions in class

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Nance is one of the best professors I have had at William and Mary. She gives good lectures, provides clear instructions for readings and assignments, and is always willing to help students. The course is generally pretty interesting. For tests, use the review guides she provides, review the textbook and notes, and pay attention in class!