Reviews of professor Daniel Eness

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
ENGL 309 online workload is much heavier during the first half of the semester than it is during the second half, so be prepared for that. There were a few issues with instructions over the course of the class, but he is fairly quick to respond to emails. Communicate a lot during the group project, and you will be just fine.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
There is a ton of work but it is proposals. Theres also some group assignments and a big paper at the end. Everyone is graded together and theres no team evaluation which really sucks. He takes long to grade and most feedback is from the students in your class.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Lectures are only relevant to the class 50% of the time, and even with the relevant lectures, I found it very easy to get stuck on assignments/not know what to do. However, I hardly tried on main assignment of the class and got a decent grade. Didn't grade major assignments until the last week of the semester. Nice guy, just odd class structure.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Eness is honestly a great guy, hes super nice and a genuine dude but he is not a good professor; he even said that himself on the first day. Driving to campus on the days I had his class had me wanting to turn into oncoming traffic. Try to get another professor if you can. Other than that he's an awesome dude