Reviews of professor Kenneth Vigeant

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Professor is teaching a research course but doesnt know how to do research.. He hands out worksheets that he can't even answer, and then tests you on material that you haven't been taught. When he attempts to take up the worksheets he skips a bunch of it because he can't "read" his own writing. Overall, a bad experience

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I did HORRIBLE on his final exam because there wasn't enough time for me (my fault). But still, I'd have him again because he was REALLY NICE. He's generous and he cares. He marks really easily as well for his assignments. The textbook is really pointless, you don't really need it. The second assignment can be helpful with the textbook -- optional.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He is actually much better organized than some of these other reviews would suggest. He gives clear and concise materials that explain the topics, and he doesn't mind repeating himself when students ask him questions. He also gives clear and concise explanations, and it is a big bonus to have recorded sessions to understand what he is saying.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Ken was my professor for the Legal Research course in the Paralegal Graduate Certificate course. Ken is fairly easy marker, the exams are OK. As long as you do the reading (which was a light, easy read) you will do great.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Kenneth is a very underrated prof. He's funny, caring and gives good feedback outside class. When he says to do work at home, heed his words. His instructions are clear and most students falter by not keeping up with his workload. Do your readings and his homework and you will do well. His biggest "crime" is expecting more from his students