Reviews of professor Simon Bonner

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
I have nothing to say for him and super tired of this class.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Simon is a friendly enough guy but unfortunately his disposition doesn't translate very well into lectures. Examples are overly detailed to the point of confusion, assignment and test questions involve proof after proof, and marking is extremely harsh. Office hours are for the most part helpful which offers some redemption

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
He takes the classroom very seriously. And very fair.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Lecture material does not prepare you for testing material. Little to no classroom interaction and you are not allowed to ask questions in lecture. If you want to learn statistics and get a good mark, DO NOT take this course!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Bonner's lectures aren't very focused and he's hard to listen to. His weekly review exercises were annoying but helpful in forcing you to keep up. Quizzes and exam were quite fair. Much better than the prof who taught this course before so count your blessings if you get Bonner.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
If you have another option for another prof, don't take Bonner. Just DON'T.