Reviews of professor Eva Nicasio-Mercier

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
She takes very seriously the fact that this is an upper-level course, you'll feel smarter after taking it. Quizzes for every chapter(1-7), two midterms, one group presentation, many case analysis. Don't just study off of ppts for midterms, she gets questions right from the textbook. Exams are on BB and she uses a lockdown browser, so get ready.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Like others have said, I really don't get the bad reviews. She is honestly such a kind professor that looks out for her students. Sure her grading criteria is a little weird and can be hard to understand what she wants, but she never gives people bad grades. Just do the best you can and she will reward you. People need to give her a chance!

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I am not sure why she has the reviews she has. Her lectures were actually very interesting & class structure is well organized: weekly chapter readings, quizzes & case studies (easy). Read the book and go to lectures and you can easily get an A or B. The exams are a bit challenging but she tells you what to expect. She is also very pleasant!

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
have you ever wanted a professor who has a veritable research paper every week? how about one that has a paper, a discussion, and a quiz every week? now how about one that makes you write a paper every week on a question that's hard to understand and even more difficult to research properly if you answered yes to any of the above questions why

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Do You want to hurt your GPA?! so go ahead. Good luck with your decision.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Online asynchronous. 6 short/easy quizzes drop (drops Lowest) 75% of grade. 15% was a useless group project. The rest is a resume assignment which I enjoyed because of the practicality, & a few busy work assignments. Learning material was a bunch of boring articles/videos. Overall a doable class but too many busy work assignments.