Reviews of professor Chapman Waters

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
had an overall good experience in this class. If you understand logic and reasoning you don't need to go (unless there's a test) but if you are new to it, then he's a good instructor on the subject.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
As a stem & humanities dual-major, believe me when I say this is the hardest course of my entire academic career. Philosophy of math is not enjoyable but having a prof as eccentric and unclear in teaching as Waters makes it all the more difficult and unenjoyable. Unfortunate for me this course was required. He is a sweet person but awful teacher.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
As someone who has taken two of Chapman's classes and plans on taking a third, I can confidently say that he is one of the best professors in the philosophy department. He's passionate, funny, and knowledgeable about what he's talking about. While some assignments can be challenging, they are far from impossible.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Was actually Phil 3210 Inductive Logic that but was not an option to select for this rating.

Great professor who is determined to make inductive logic fun and applicable.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Chapman is a great professor. Have taken a couple classes from him and if you read the readings non-trivially and ask questions about the readings you will get at least a B

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
I did fairly well in this class because I'm good at logic & transcription systems, & I was able to teach myself from the textbook. If you don't think you can teach yourself the material, don't take a class from this professor. He seems like a nice person but his lectures are highly confusing & unhelpful. Homework, tests, & grading are fair however.