Reviews of professor Pierette Kulpa

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
As a person, she's nice, but I do not like her as a professor. She did not make the class interesting for me, and though I took notes the tests were so difficult. I took the class online, and for the amount of multiple-choice in addition to a short essay the time was absolutely ridiculously short. The class would be enjoyable without the tests.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
She is really passionate about what she is talking about. But the material that she covers in class isnt quite connected to what is on the test, which is most of our grade. I wish there was more interaction it mostly just her talking the whole time. She is very kind and nice but not a great teacher.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
I took this as an online course and it was very interesting and was a breeze! Would definitely take ger classes again.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I enjoyed Professor Kulpa a lot. Her course was enjoyable and very easy to manage. She outlines her expectations on exams very clearly, and only gave one assignment weekly- they usually took less than 15 minutes to complete. Tests were easy as long as you studied. I normally dislike art history, but I grew to appreciate it more after this class.

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
all work is online and her lectures mean nothing for the exams. the homework is the only thing that helps with an exam. paper at the end of the semester was easy and she was helpful with it.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This 300 level class covered Italian Baroque art for 12 weeks and Spanish and French Baroque for one week each. It was a traditional course with two exams, a research paper, a short presentation, and weekly short written homeworks on journal papers. There was at least one "in-class activity" each week, but these were fairly sensible.