Reviews of professor Julie Minich

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
The class is graded on 2 short essays and 2 take-home exams. Each class day had a reading assignment, found in a course reader, that would be discussed in class. She did not lecture, the class was discussion based. She would lead the discussion with questions of interpretation and summarization. Pay attention to these questions! She'afantastic!

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Reading Heavy. Lectures help clear up confusion on reading if you didn't understand what you read the night before which is very helpful.
Grade is based on instapoll, discussion attendance, reflections, annotations, and a project at the end. All graded fairly by TA's, but beware if you miss more than three discussions there's no way to get an A.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
minich is v nice & accommodating; inclusive of various literature backgrounds. grade bundles in syl for how much work u wanna do for ur grade. no exams. only real graded pieces are weekly reading quizzes (should read but don't need to, I didn't). instapolls (3-5 each lecture, opinion-based), CRITs, & end of sem syllabus are completion. easiest A.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
Profe Julie was one of the best professors I've had. The grading criteria are as clear as they can possibly be. Things are marked as complete or incomplete rather than assigned a grade. She also gives multiple options on how to receive credit. Not by any means a difficult course.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
I would leave a more detailed review if I actually paid attention in class, but I still got an A. Letter grades are based off of the number of assignments you complete and their quality doesn't matter too much. Take this class if you're looking for an easy/decently interesting GC flag!