Reviews of professor Joshua Crabill

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Professor Crabill was 50/50. Sometimes, lectures were very interesting and engaging. Other times, it was so slow. The tests were just fine if you reviewed readings before the test. I only read half the required readings and did just fine on exams. Just make sure you know the basics of each reading, not details.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
I thought this was a really fair class. There were readings and reflections due before every class but he dropped like 14 of them. 2 paper that you will get an A on as long as you follow the directions very exactly. The tests aren't bad at all just make sure to have general understandings of philosophical theories.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Only 2 essays each are 4-5 pages long including citations which are not bad. HOWEVER, you have to read every day before class starts and write reflections about the reading. The reflections are not bad, you can create an actual MEME and write 100 words. It is just a lot of reading. His feedbacks are very opinionative.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
This is such an unnecessary class. Its required for so many majors and he makes it awfully uninteresting and time consuming. One of the worst classes and professors I have taken at this school. Way too much busywork and unclear grading policies for a class that no one in the room cared one bit about.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
His tests are pretty hard in my opinion and there are readings that you have to write about that requires 250 words. His lectures are a hit or miss, some days are super engaging and interesting and other days are really boring.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
This class could be awesome because the topics are so interesting but Dr. Crabill is just a horrible lecturer/professor. Needs to work on his public speaking skills and is a stickler for the smallest things on papers and exams. So many awkward silences as he doesn't create an engaging classroom environment. Take literally any other professor.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
the class is very easy, just 1. do the readings 2. VERY generally understand the concepts he teaches. theres readings before every class that you do for an assignment but he drops 15 of them so just be conscious of that. he only gives 2 tests: the mid term and final but he provides reviews for both. mostly opinion based so its hard to get it wrong

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Boring af and a lot of busy work but easy A

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
The only way you will succeed in this class is if you have the same views at Crabill. Lots of readings and reflections on the readings, very lecture heavy. His lectures can be super uninformative, the readings is where you will succeed. The class was pretty interesting but Crabill is not. Overall, I don't recommend.