Reviews of professor Roger Grosse

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Nothing good about him, doesn't know how to explain topics, and lectures are filled with complex math that only he understands and that you won't see again if you work in this field. Terrible tests/exams as well.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
The professor simply reads the slides in the lecture.

Rating: 2.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
+Boring lectures. +Exams based only on your memorization power > no conceptual checking.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Very hard

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Very professional in machine learning and neural network, but not good at giving lectures, and gave super hard final. However, you can get good answers if you ask him questions directly.

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
Correct but extremely confusing slides. Test is hard and no aid sheets. (get ready to memorize all formulas from slides or you might fail)

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 4.0/5
Good course, learned a lot. He was the course coordinator when I took it, the homeworks tended to be long but very fair, exams were fine as well. Make sure you have the right math/stats background before taking it (i.e. decent knowledge of linear algebra, multivariable calc, and stats/probability from 2nd year courses).

Rating: 1.0/5, difficulty: 5.0/5
The slides are pretty terrible maybe because this is the first time he taught this course. He know his stuff though