Reviews of professor Jorge Gonzalez

Rating: 3.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
Good professor, class is a breeze if you know what you're doing. There is no homework besides readings, and your grade is 3 quizzes and 2 six page papers. 

One thing he does not know how to do is take attendance. He could take it in 2 minutes by calling our names but decides to leave a paper for you to sign in that forms a long line in the room.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
3 quizzes, 2 essays. The essays are really simple, quizzes are basically word-definition memorization and matching. The textbooks are only needed for the essays, not many people read them. The subject can be really boring to the point of snoozing. (was a large lecture). He's a breeze as long as you show up as he does take attendance. Easy class.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Great class! Participating is imperative to making the lectures interesting and enjoyable. Very empathetic and understanding of any circumstances.

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 3.0/5
One of the better professors. Graded on six discussion board posts, two papers, and a 5-min presentation. Classes are mostly him lecturing and leading discussions about the reading. Try to pay attention and participate, because he'll randomly call on you. Take notes, it'll help with writing your papers/posts, which he'll read thoroughly.

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 1.0/5
His lectures are very tedious but sometimes you'll catch something that's interesting to you. He's very nice though! He encourages students to do their best. He makes you read textbooks but not many students do but we still ace his quizzes. His essay questions are silly. He's really not bad though!

Rating: 4.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Lectures r exactly like previous reviews, pretty boring but yall can live. class now consist of writing a paper where u hv to apply to a given situation, write a descriptive ethnography (5-6, midterm), and an analytical ethnography (7-8 pages, final). Also, before going to class u hv to write 3 bullet pts about wht yall read (counts as partici.)

Rating: 5.0/5, difficulty: 2.0/5
Many people haven't had the best review of him, but for me, he was a great professor. Lectures were interesting and what he expected from us was clear; no complaints.