Yoxas/statistical_literacy huggingface dataset:
Health literacy is closely related to the incidence of major chronic diseases and its related behaviors such as cancer-related behaviors. This study explored how the cancer health literacy level affects cancer-related behaviors. About one to two villages from six cities of Shandong province were selected as sample areas. Professionals conducted face-to-face interviews with the participants. Finally, 1200 residents completed 1085 effective questionnaires. Data were analysed from a cross-sectional survey in 2019, which included 1085 residents in six cities/counties of Shandong province, China. The result showed that residents with high cancer health literacy were more likely to eat fruits and vegetables frequently, avoid eating moldy food and take exercise. Besides, they were more likely to engage in health education and have a higher willingness to pay for cancer screenings. Most residents in Shandong province have a basic level of cancer health literacy. Improving the cancer health literacy of the population can be an effective strategy to promote a healthier lifestyle, thereby reducing the incidence rates related to cancers.
Health literacy is considered the single best predictor of health status. Organizations including the American Medical Association (AMA) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH) have recommended that the readability of patient education materials not exceed the sixth-grade level. Our study focuses on the readability of self-designated hernia centers websites at both academic and community organizations across the United States to determine their ability to dispense patient information at an appropriate reading level. A search was conducted utilizing the Google search engine. The key words "Hernia Center" and "University Hernia Center" were used to identify links to surgical programs within the United States. The following readability tests were conducted via the program: Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL), Gunning Fox Index (GFI), Coleman-Liau Index (CLI), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG), and Flesch Reading Ease (FRE) score. Of 96 websites, zero (0%) had fulfilled the recommended reading level in all four tests. The mean test scores for all non-academic centers (n = 50) were as follows: FKGL (11.14 ± 2.68), GFI (14.39 ± 3.07), CLI (9.29 ± 2.48) and SMOG (13.38 ± 2.03). The mean test scores [SK1] for all academic programs (n = 46) were as follows: FKGL (11.7 ± 2.66), GFI (15.01 ± 2.99), CLI (9.34 ± 1.91) and SMOG (13.71 ± 2.02). A one-sample t test was performed to compare the FKGL, GFI, CLI, and SMOG scores for each hernia center to a value of 6.9 (6.9 or less is considered an acceptable reading level) and a p value of 0.001 for all four tests were noted demonstrating statistical significance. The Academic and Community readability scores for both groups were compared to each other with a two-sample t test with a p value of > 0.05 for all four tests and there were no statistically significant differences. Neither Academic nor Community hernia centers met the appropriate reading level of sixth-grade or less. Steps moving forward to improve patient comprehension and/or involving with their care should include appropriate reading level material, identification of a patient with a low literacy level with intervention or additional counseling when appropriate, and the addition of adjunct learning materials such as videos.
Health literacy is crucial to adherence to medical interventions in therapeutics, prevention, and diagnosis. The basis for literacy is knowledge. To accomplish the goals for the elimination of cervical cancer, one of the most prevalent and preventable cancers, we must understand the determinants of non-adherence and address them specifically to ensure patients' active participation. To determine women's knowledge regarding the manifestations of cervical cancer and its prevention. We conducted a cross-sectional study in an urban population from northern Portugal. Women aged 18 to 30 years were randomly assigned to answer the Cervical Cancer Awareness Measure questionnaire, including questions of knowledge about the causes and symptoms of cervical cancer, prospecting for individual and social-related determinants. The total number of participants was 270, with a mean age of 24.7 years. Knowledge about symptoms scored 5.4 ± 2.6, with a maximum of 12 points, and knowledge about the causes scored 5.7 ± 1.9, with a maximum of 11 points. The correlation between both was 0.334. High education, high socio-economic status, self-perception of one's capacity to recognize symptoms, and knowledge about the HPV vaccine were associated with better knowledge. Portuguese women present low knowledge about cervical cancer, potentially affecting their health through exposure to risk situations and non-adherence to routine screening.
Health literacy is defined as a person's ability to find, understand, and use health-related information when making health-related decisions. Patients with lower health literacy more frequently face difficulties when they have health issues or need medical help. Such patients are less likely to visit health care facilities and receive less help, which subsequently leads to higher hospitalization and mortality rates. Patients with better health literacy skills pay more attention to their health behaviours. This is a cross-sectional survey conducted in two primary health care centres-one public and one private-in Lithuania. The study enrolled patients who were visiting family physicians (n = 399). The study used the Health Literacy Survey European Questionnaire (HLS-EU-Q47). Calculation of means and two independent samples were used for statistical analysis, and a correlation coefficient was calculated. The majority (40.6%) of respondents had problematic health literacy, while only 7% had excellent health literacy. Better health literacy was observed among younger patients (aged below 30 years), residing in urban areas, having higher education, and living with a partner. Inadequate or problematic health literacy was noted among 83.6% of respondents aged 59 years and older; similar rates were also observed among patients with basic or primary education (76.1%), secondary education (76.6%), and divorced patients (86%). Respondents with better health literacy also had better health behaviours (p < 0.05). Health literacy is influenced by age, residence, education, and family status. Patients with better health literacy also reported better health behaviours.
Health literacy is defined as the capacity of an individual to acquire, interpret, and understand basic health information and services to improve their health. Cancer patients often turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) to cope with diagnosis and treatment processes. The study aimed to determine the effects of health-literacy levels on oncology patients' use of CAM. The research team conducted a descriptive cross-sectional study. Using a 95% confidence interval and a 0.95 power ratio, with the analysis performed in the G Power statistical analysis program, version 3.1, the study sample was calculated to be a minimum 120 people. The study took place in Turkey in the outpatient chemotherapy and oncology unit at Ondokuz Mayis University's Health Application and Research Center between February 2019 and January 2020. Participants were 200 oncology patients treated in the unit. The data were collected using an introductory information form, the Health Literacy Scale (HLS), and the Holistic Complementary and Alternative Health Questionnaire (HCAMQ). Results were analyzed using percentages, means, and the Spearman correlation analysis, Mann Whitney U, and Kruskal Walls tests. Of the 200 participants, 54% were women; 38.0% were between the ages of 57 and 69; 53.5% were primary school graduates; and 36% were Stage-4 cancer patients. The most common side effect of chemotherapy was fatigue and weakness, with 80.5% experiencing those symptoms. Concerning CAM use, 42.5% used at least one CAM method, and 44.7% of those individuals stated that they resorted to those methods to reduce the treatment's negative effects. The participants' health literacy levels were high, and they had moderately positive attitudes toward CAM. No significant relationship existed between health-literacy levels and attitudes toward CAM (P = .219). However, strengthening health literacy can be a preventive practice for the correct and reliable use of CAM.
Health literacy is defined as the cognitive and social skills that determine the motivation and ability of individuals to gain access to, understand and use information in ways that promote and maintain good health. A Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) is a toolkit with good reliability and validity. Accordingly, this study administered HLQ among older adults in China to examine its factor structure, reliability, homogeneity, and discriminant validity for use in understanding better the health literacy of older adults and determining corresponding measures. Psychometric properties were examined based on the data collected via face-to-face interviews (N = 343). Tests included the difficulty level, composite scale reliability, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and Bayesian structural equation modeling (BSEM). The easiest scale to obtain a high score was "Social support for health" and the hardest, "Navigating the health care system" and "Appraisal of health information." Two one-factor models fitted well with no correlated residuals allowed. After model modification, the CFA fit statistics of the other seven scales were good. All HLQ scales were found to be homogenous, with a composite reliability ranging from 0.74 to 0.85. The nine-factor Bayesian structural equation model fitted the data well (Posterior-Predictive-P value = 0.670; 95% Confidence Interval for the difference between the observed and replicated Chi-square values = - 163.320, 102.750). The Chinese version of the HLQ has strong construct and content validity and high composite reliability when applied to older adults in Changsha City, China. Therefore, the nine-scale HLQ can now be administered to Chinese older adults, thereby providing a powerful approach to understanding the multidimensional area of health literacy.
Health literacy is described as a domain of competence across the life-span, gaining particular prominence in light of age-associated health restrictions. However, no specific measurement approach has been proposed for old age. The aim of this study is to augment the existing HLS-EU-Q16 scale (16 items) by items sensitive to age-specific aspects of health literacy to ensure validity and reliability for use in old age. In a first step, the HLS-EU-Q16 was administered in a sample of 463 individuals aged 72 - 92 years. Psychometric properties were evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis and item-response-theory item fit statistics. Scale reliability was found to be poor in this population segment. In a second step, age-specific items were developed based on qualitative in-depth interviews with older persons. In a third step, we tested if the additional set of age-specific items was able to enhance a valid and reliable measurement of health literacy in a second sample of older adults (N = 107, 49 - 91 years). With the inclusion of an eight-item add-on, it was possible to measure health literacy in old and very old age with both high validity and satisfying precision (reliability = 0.80). The study contributes to a population-specific measurement of health literacy.
Health literacy is generally low in marginalized groups, leading to delays in accessing care, poor health outcomes, and health disparities. Yet, some individuals in these groups demonstrate higher health literacy and better health outcomes. These exceptional cases exemplify 'positive deviance' because they have found ways to be successful where others have not. Identifying the methods, practices, and resources that these individuals have used to gain health literacy and healthcare access may have generalized application to improve health literacy, access to care, and health outcomes. Using the Integrated Model of Health Literacy, the main objectives of this study are to (1) identify facilitators, barriers, and strategies to gain sexual and reproductive health literacy and healthcare access and (2) to explore each of the core domains of health literacy as they relate to successful access of sexual and reproductive healthcare services among individuals identified as positive deviants. For the purposes of this mixed methods community engaged study, positive deviants are defined as Mexican American young women aged 18-29 years old living in Rural Western New York who have accessed sexual and reproductive healthcare within the past year. A community advisory committee will be formed to provide community-engaged guidance and support for the recruitment of participants. Positive deviants will participate in a survey and semi-structured interview. Data collection and analysis will be simultaneous and iterative. Results will provide evidence of positive deviant methods, practices, and strategies to gain health literacy and access to sexual and reproductive healthcare. Findings may reveal characteristics and patterns in the relationship of health literacy and healthcare access that can inform interventions to improve health literacy and make healthcare more accessible for this demographic group and context.
Health literacy is important for patient care. Patient support group (PSG) is also crucial for patient education. Little is known about the effect of PSG on health literacy. We studied scores of health literacy before and after the intervention of a PSG. We also collected patient characteristics like age, gender, first-time participation or not, source of participants, and major diseases. We then identified factors associated with improved health literacy. A total of 43 participants (including patients and family) were studied with 100% response rate on questionnaires. Before PSG intervention, the highest score was the subscale 2 (understanding) (12.10 ± 1.53), followed by subclass 4 (application) (10.74 ± 2.34) and subclass 1 (accessing) (10.72 ± 2.32). The lowest score was subclass 3 (appraisal) (9.77 ± 2.39). After the statistical analyses, the final results in difference comparisons were subclass 2 = 5 > 4 = 1 = 3. The improved score of PSG was only noticed in subclass 3 (appraisal) after PSG intervention (9.77 ± 2.39 vs 10.74 ± 2.55, P = .015). Health literacy scores improvements were noticed in "Evaluate whether the health information can be used to solve medical problems" (2.51 ± 0.68 vs 2.74 ± 6.78, P = .048), and in "Evaluate the reliability of medical information from network" (2.28 ± 0.83 vs 2.64 ± 0.78, P = .006) (Table 3). Both scores belonged to subclass 3 (appraisal). We found no factor being associated with improved health literacy. This is the first study regarding the effect of PSG on health literacy. In all 5 dimensions of health literacy, the ability of appraising medical information is lacking in the current era. With suitable design of PSG, the PSG may improve health literacy improved literacy, including the dimension of appraisal.
Health literacy is increasingly understood to be a mediator of chronic disease self-management and health care utilization. However, there has been very little research examining health literacy among incarcerated persons. This study aimed to describe the health literacy and relevant patient characteristics in a recently incarcerated primary care patient population in 12 communities in 6 states and Puerto Rico. Baseline data were collected from 751 individuals through the national Transitions Clinic Network (TCN), a model which utilizes a community health worker (CHW) with a previous history of incarceration to engage previously incarcerated people with chronic medical diseases in medical care upon release. Participants in this study completed study measures during or shortly after their first medical visit in the TCN. Data included demographics, health-related survey responses, and a measure of health literacy, The Newest Vital Sign (NVS). Bivariate and linear regression models were fit to explore associations among health literacy and the time from release to first clinic appointment, number of emergency room visits before first clinic appointment and confidence in adhering to medication. Our study found that almost 60% of the sample had inadequate health literacy. Inadequate health literacy was associated with decreased confidence in taking medications following release and an increased likelihood of visiting the emergency department prior to primary care. Early engagement may improve health risks for this population of individuals that is at high risk of death, acute care utilization, and hospitalization following release.
Health literacy is progressively seen as an indicator to describe a nation's health status. To improve health literacy, countries need to address health inequalities by examining different social demographic factors across the population. This assessment is crucial to identify and evaluate the strengths and limitations of a country in addressing health issues. By addressing these health inequalities, a country would be better informed to take necessary steps to improve the nation's health literacy. This study examines health literacy levels in Malaysia and analyses socio-demographic factors that are associated with health literacy. A cross-sectional survey was carried out using the HLS-M-Q18 instrument, which was validated for the Malaysian population. Multi-stage random sampling strategy was used in this study, utilising several sampling techniques including quota sampling, cluster sampling, and simple random sampling to allow random data collection. A total of 855 respondents were sampled. Our results showed that there were significant associations between health literacy and age, health status, and health problems. Our findings also suggest that lower health literacy levels were associated with the younger generation. This study's findings have provided baseline data on Malaysians' health literacy and provide evidence showing potential areas of intervention.
Health literacy is related to a variety of health outcomes, including disease control, health-related quality of life, and risk for death. Few studies have investigated the relation of electronic health literacy (e-health literacy) to outcomes or the mechanism by which they may be related. Secondary data were drawn from participants in a larger study on chronic disease self-management who were age 40 years and older, had at least one chronic health condition and a health literacy score of 8th grade or below on the validated short form of the Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine. Participants completed the e-Health Literacy Scale (eHEALS), the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale, a modified version of the Attitudes Toward Health Care Providers Scale (ATHCPS), the Wake Forest Physician Trust Scale (WFPTS), and the Gonzalez-Lu adherence questionnaire. Hypothesized relations were evaluated in a bootstrapped path analytic model using the Mplus statistical software. Participants included 334 individuals (mean age: 57.5 years; 173 women and 161 men) with Black, Indigenous, and People of Color accounting for 83.3% of the participants and White individuals making up 16.7% of the participants. Model results showed that after controlling for age, education, gender, and race, the eHEALS score was significantly related to the ATHCPS and WFPTS but not to the Gonzalez-Lu adherence questionnaire (p < .05). The eHEALS score was significantly related to the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control scale. Analysis of indirect effects showed that a portion of the relation between e-health literacy and patient attitude and adherence was mediated by internal locus of control (all p < .05). In this study, e-health literacy was related to important patient attitude and behavior variables via locus of control. This finding has implications for the importance of improving patients' ability to use the internet to access and effectively use health information. [HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice. 2023;7(2):e80-e88. ].
Health literacy is the ability to access to, understand, evaluate and use of essential health information to make basic health decisions. This study aimed to develop and psychometrically evaluate an instrument for measuring health literacy among adults (the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults - HELIA). In addition to a literature review, a panel of specialists from different disciplines was formed to generate an item pool. Then, a framework was defined to develop the initial questionnaire based on a definition of health literacy and the most important global public health issues. The initial questionnaire contained 66 items. Next, 15 experts in public health were approached to assess content validity. Consequently, 19 items were removed and a provisional version of the questionnaire with 47 items was provided. Finally, a random sample of adults completed the questionnaire and psychometric properties of the instrument were assessed. Overall, 323 adults aged 18 to 65 years old completed the questionnaire. When the exploratory factor analysis was performed, 33 items were loaded, which indicated a 5-factor solution for the questionnaire that jointly explained 52.9% of the variance observed. The factors were as follows: access to information (6 items), reading (4 items), understanding (7 items), appraisal (4 items), and decision making/behavioral intention (12 items). Confirmatory factory analysis also indicated a good fit to the data for the five-latent structure (χ2/df = 1.60, SRMR = 0.049; RMSEA = 0.043; CFI = 0.98; NFI = 0.95; NNFI = 0.98 and GFI = 0.87). Additional analysis for internal consistency showed satisfactory results with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.72 to 0.89. Intraclass correlation coefficient (test-retest analysis) also showed acceptable stability for the questionnaire (ICC = 0.84). The mean score for health literacy as measured by the HELIA was 76.3 (SD = 15.1) out of 100 for the study sample. The findings suggest that the Health Literacy Instrument for Adults (HELIA) is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring health literacy. It is a short and easy-to-use instrument that could be applied in different settings.
Health literacy is the capacity to acquire, process, and understand basic information and services necessary for appropriate health decisions. Given the importance of health literacy in women, the aim of the present study was to determine the effect of health literacy level on improving the quality of care during pregnancy in pregnant women. The present study was a cross-sectional analytical study. In this study, 130 women referred to Yazd health centers were examined. Health literacy questionnaires and a researcher-made checklist of the quality of pregnancy care were used to gather information. The researcher-made checklist of the quality of pregnancy care was in accordance with the standard protocol of the Ministry of Health and Medical Education, entitled Integrated Health Care for Pregnant Mothers, which was validated and reliable. SPSS statistical software version 19 and t-test and ANOVA statistical tests were used to analyze the data. According to the findings, the average score of health literacy in pregnant women was 74.09, which showed that the level of health literacy was in the marginal or border range. People with higher health literacy received significantly more prenatal counseling than other women and had a planned pregnancy (P = 0.04). The level of health literacy in pregnant women is unfavorable. Given that the high level of health literacy in women in society can lead to an increase in the quality of pregnancy care, so to increase health literacy in women, it is recommended that regular training in society by health-care providers be given more attention.