Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTIUCT COURT WESTERN DISTIUCT OF NEW YORK
---------------------------------------------------x
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Pl a in ti ff,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK,
Defendant.
----------------------------------------------------------x

CIVIL ACTION NO: .TIJRY TIUAL DEMANDED

NATURE OF THE ACTION

This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U .S.C. §2000-e et~. ("Title VII"), Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 ("CRA 1991 "), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U.S.c. §621 et ~ ("ADEA"), to have the Court declare that certain provisions of the releases and waivers used by Defendant Eastman Kodak ("Kodak") violate Title VII and the ADEA by providing that employees who sign them cannot "assist" the EEOC, other "persons[s]," or any other " entity" in bringing Title VII or ADEA lawsuits, by mandating that employees tenderback all severance payments if they breach them by assisting the EEOC and others, and by requiring that employees pay all of Kodak ' s legal fees and costs if they breach them by assisting the EEOC and others .
J UIUSDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U .s.c. §§451 , 1331 , 1337,1343 and 1345 . This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 706(£)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.c. §§2000e-5 (f) (l) and (3) ("Title VII") and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991,42 U .S.c. §1981 a. This action is

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 2 of 9
further authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 7(b) of the ADEA, 29 U.s.c. §626(b), which incorporates by reference Sections 16(c) and 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S .c. §§216(c) and 217.
2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were and are now being committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of New York.
PARTIES 3. Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission") is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Sections 706(£)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.c. §§2000e-5(f)(I) and (3). 4. The Commission is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of the ADEA and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 7 of the ADEA, 29 U.S.c. §626, as amended by Section 2 of Reorganization Plan No.1 of 1978, 92 Stat. 3781, and by Public Law 98-532 (1984), 98 Stat. 2705 . 5. At all relevant times, Kodak has continuously been a company doing business in the State of New York and the county of Monroe, and has continuously had at least twenty (20) employees. 6. At all relevant times, Kodak has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.c. §§2000e(b), (g) and (h).
2

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 3 of 9

7.

At all relevant times, Kodak has continuously been an employer engaged

in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 11 (b), (g) and (h) of the

A DEA, 29 V.S .c. §§630(b), (g) and (h).

CaNCILLATION

8.

Prior to the institution of this lawsuit the EEOC's representatives

attempted to eliminate the unlawful employment practices alleged below and to effect voluntary

compliance with itle V II through informal methods of conciliation, conference, and persuasion

within the meaning of Section 706(b) of Title VII, 42 U.S.c. §2000e-5.

9. Prior to the institution of this lawsuit the EEOC's representatives

attempted to eliminate the unlawful employment practices alleged below and to effect voluntary

compliance with the ADEA through informal methods of conciliation, conference, and

persuasion within the meaning of Section 7(b) ofthe ADEA, 29 V.S.c. §626(b).

STATEMENT OF CLAIMS

10. Since at least January 1, 2003, Kodak has required employees who receive

severance upon separating from employment to sign a release and/or waiver.

11. Kodak's releases and waivers provide that employees will not assist the

EEOC and other persons or entities in bringing lawsuits in state or federal court, including claims

brought under Title VII and the ADEA (the "non-cooperation clause").

12. By using the non-cooperation clause, Kodak has violated Section 704(a)

of Title V II, 42 U .S .c. §2000e-3(a), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify,

assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under Title VII.

3

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 4 of 9
13. By using the non-cooperation clause, Kodak has violated Section 4(d) of the ADEA, 29 U. S.c. §623(d), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA.
14. By using the non-cooperation clause, Kodak has violated Section 7(£)(4) of the ADEA, 29 U.S.c. §626(f)(4), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA.
15. Kodak ' s releases and waivers provide that if an employee breaches the release or waiver, including but not limited to a violation of the non-cooperation clause, the employee will immediately tenderback all severance benefits received from Kodak (the "tenderback clause").
16. By using the tenderback clause, Kodak has violated Section 704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.c. §2000e-3(a), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under Title VII.
17. By using the tenderback clause, Kodak has violated Section 4(d) of the AD EA, 29 u.s.c. §623(d), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA.
18. By using the tenderback clause, Kodak has violated Section 7(£)(4) of the ADEA, 29 U .S .c. §626(£)(4), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify, assist, or pa11icipate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA.
19. Kodak's releases and waivers provide that if an employee breaches the release or waiver, including but not limited to a violation of the non-cooperation clause, the employee will be responsible for all of Kodak's legal fees and costs in any lawsuit related to the breach (the "legal fees clause").
4

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 5 of 9
20. By using the legal fees clause, Kodak has violated Section 704(a) of Ti tle VII, 42 U. S.C. §2000e-3(a), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify, assist, OT participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under Title VII.
21 . By using the legal fees clause, Kodak has violated Section 4(d) of the ADEA, 29 U.S .c. §623(d), by interfering in an employee's protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA.
22 . By using the legal fees clause, Kodak has violated Section 7(f)(4) of the A DEA, 29 U .s.c. §626(f)(4), by interfering in an employee ' s protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA.
23 . The effect of the practices complained of above has been to deprive employees of the ir protected rights to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under Title VII , and otherwise affect their status as employees because of their protected rights.
24. The effect of the practices complained of above has been to deprive employees of their protected rights to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA, and otherwise affect their status as employees because of their protected rights .
25. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were and are inte nti ona l.
26 . The unlawful employment practices complained of above were and are done with ma lice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of employees.
27. The unlawful employment practices complained of above were and are willful within the meaning of the ADEA.
5

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 6 of 9
JURY TRIAL DEMAND 28. The EEOC requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its C o m p l a int.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE , Plaintiff EEOC respectfu lly that this COUIt: A. Declare that certain provisions of Kodak's releases and waivers interfere with employees' protected rights to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under Title VII, and otherwise affect their status as employees because of their protected rights under Title VII; B. Declare that certain provisions of Kodak's releases and waivers interfere with employees ' protected rights to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under the ADEA, and otherwise affect their status as employees because of their protected rights under the ADEA; C. Grant a permanent injunction restraining Kodak, its officers, management personnel, employees, agents, successors assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, from engaging in employment practices which interfere with employees' protected rights to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing brought under Title VII, and otherwise affect their status as employees because of their protected rights under Title VII; D. Grant a permanent injunction restraining Kodak, its officers, management personnel, employees, agents, successors assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, from engaging in employment practices which interfere with employees' protected rights to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing
6

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 7 of 9

brought under the ADEA, and otherwise affect their status as employees because of their

protected ri ghts;

E. Order Kodak to institute and carry out policies, practices and programs

which provide equal employment opportunities for individuals who participate in activity

protected by Title VII, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful

employment practices;

F. Order Kodak to institute and carry out policies, practices and programs

which provide equal employment opportunities for individuals who participate in activity

protected by the ADEA, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful

employment practices;

G. Order Kodak to provide such other affirmative relief as is necessary to

eradicate the effects of its unlawful practices, including, but not limited to, providing notice to all

persons who signed a release or waiver of the invalidity of certain provisions therein, and of their

protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing

brought under Title VII;

H. Order Kodak to provide such other affirmative relief as is necessary to

eradicate the effects of its unlawful practices, including, but not limited to, providing notice to all

persons who signed a release or waiver of the invalidity of certain provisions therein, and of their

protected right to testify, assist, or participate in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing

brought under the ADEA;

1.

Order Kodak to provide such other affirmative relief as is necessary to

eradicate the etIects of its unlawful practices, including, but not limited to, providing notice to all

7

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 8 of 9

persons who signed a reJease or waiver of the invalidity of certain provisions therein, and of their

right to pursue discrimination charges against Kodak under Title VII;

J.

Order Kodak to provide such other affinnative relief as is necessary to

eradicate the effects of its unlawful practices, including, but not limited to, providing notice to all

persons who signed a release or waiver of the invalidity of certain provisions therein, and of their

right to pursue discrimination charges against Kodak under the ADEA;

K.

njoin Kodak from raising a timeliness or statute of limitations defense to

Title VII charges, or suits based upon such charges, filed by employees who did not earlier file

their Title VlI charges because they had signed a release or waiver;

L. Enjoin Kodak from raising a timeliness or statute of limitations defense to

ADEA charges, or suits based upon such charges, filed by employees who did not earlier fi le

their ADEA charges because they had signed a release or waiver;

M . Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the

public interest;

8

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 1 Filed 09/29/2006 Page 9 of 9

N . Award the EEOC its costs in this action .

Dated: September 29, 2006 New York, NY

Respectfully submitted,
Ronald S. Cooper General Counsel
James L. Lee Deputy General Counsel
Gwendolyn Young Reams Associate General Counsel
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 "L" Street, N.W. Washington D.C. 20507
<-

Lisa D. Sirkin
~~Ci;;::;JtOt7f?~ ~£1
Michael J. O'Brien Senior Trial Attorney
New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street, 5th Floor New York, New York 10004 (212) 336-3694 (212) 336-3623 (facsimile)

9

 
 Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 1 of 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
PLAINTIFF,
v.
EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY,
DEFENDANT.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 06 CV 6489 CJS (F)

CONSENT DECREE This Consent Decree is being filed simultaneous with a Complaint brought by Plaintiff United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC" or the "Commission'1, an agency ofthe United States Government, against Defendant Eastman Kodak Company ("Kodak"). The EEOC alleges in the Complaint that certain provisions of the releases and waivers used by Kodak: (i) explicitly prevented signing employees nom assisting other employees and/or entities with their claims ofdiscrimination; (li) required signing employees to repay any severance payments, and forfeit the right to any future payments, ifthey breached the agreement; and (iii) requiIed employees to pay Kodak's attorney costs and fees ifthey breached the agreement, in violation of Title VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e~Wl. ("Title VTI"), and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, as amended, 29 U,S,C. §621 .tl S!<g. ("ADEA"). The EEOC and Kodak hereto desire to settle this action, and therefore do hereby stipulate and consent to the entry ofthis Decree as final and binding between the parties and their successors or assigns. This Decree resolves all matlers related to Civil Action 06 CV64 8 9CJS (F ), now pending in the United States District Com for the Western District ofNew York. The parties agree that this Decree may be entered into without Findings of Fact and Conclusions ofLaw being made and entered by the Court. No waiver, modification or amendment ofany provision of this Consent Decree shall be

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 2 of 8

effective unless made in writing, approved by all parties to this Consent Decree and approved or ordered by the Court.
In consideration ofthe mutual promises and agreements contained in this Decree, the sufficiency ofwmch is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows, the Court finds appropriate, and it is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:

L PREFATORY MATIERS

1.

This Consent Decree resolves all issues raised in the Complaint filed by the EEOC in the

instant matter. As a result of this Consent Decree, the EEOC will cease processing ofEEOC Charge

Number 165-2004-01416, the charge upon which the EEOC's Complaint in the instant matter is based. Other

than EEOC Charge Number 165-2004-01416, this Consent Decree does not resolve any charge of

discrimination currently pending before the EEOC, or any charge that may be ftled in the future.

2.

The execution and acceptance of this Consent Decree by Kodak is voluntary and does

not and shall not constitute in any manner, or be presumed, construed or deemed to be an admission of

liability, fault, wrongdoing, or misconduct, of any kind, by Kodak in connection with the utilization of

any release or any waiver, and may not be used in evidence for any purpose in any litigation except to

enforce the Consent Decree. Kodak expressly denies any and all liability or wrongdoing in connection

with its releases or waivers. It is Kodak's express position that the terms of its releases and waivers, as

they currently exist, are lawful, valid, and enforceable and do not violate any statute, including Title VII

and the ADEA, or public policy.

3.

The EEOC and Kodak agree, and the Court fmds. that this Court has jurisdiction over

the subject matter ofthis action and the parties to this action, that venue is proper, and that all

administrative prerequisites have been met. No party shall contest the validity ofthis Decree or the

jurisdiction of this Court to enforce this Decree and its lenns.

4.

This Decree is issued with the consent of the parties.

2

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 3 of 8

5.

The EEOC and Kodak agree that this Consent Decree constitutes the complete agreement

between the EEOC and Kodak with respect to the matters referred to herein. No waiver,

modification or amendment of any provision of this Consent Decree shall be effective unless made

in writing, approved by all Parties tn this Decree, and approved or ordered by the Court.

6.

Kodak represents that it has not sought to enforce the specific provisions of its

releases or waivers which are the subject of this Action.

n. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

7.

Kodak is hereafter pennanently enjoined from offering any release or waiver of claims

which contains a provision which prevents its fonner employees from assisting other individuals or

entities (including but not limited to the EEOC) with their claims of discrimination in any fashion.

This includes, but is not limited to, claims of discrimination that are inchoate, filed with an

administrative agency (including but not limited to the EEOC), claims filed in Court, andlor any other

forwn.

8.

Kodak is hereafter permanently enjoined from seeking to enforce, in any forum

whatsoever, any provision of any release or waiver which could have been construed to prevent its

fonner employees from assisting other individuals or entities (including but not limited to the EEOC)

with their claims of discrimination in any fashion.

9.

As of the date of the entry of this Decree, Kodak agrees to use the following

language in implementing any future release or waiver:

"Except as described below, you agree and covenant not to file any suit, charge or

complaint against Releasees in any court or administrative agency, with regard to any

claim, demand, liability or obligation arising out of your employment with Kodak or

separation therefrom. You further represent that no claims, complaints, charges, or other

3

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 4 of 8
proceedings are pending in any court, administrative agency, commission or other forum relating directly or indirectly to your employment by Kodak.
Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to prohibit you from filing a charge with or participating in any investigation or proceeding conducted by the EEOC or a comparable state or local agency. Notwithstanding the foregoing, you agree to waive your right to recover monetary damages in any charge, complaint, or lawsuit filed by you or by anyone else on your behalf."
to. Within 10 business days of the date of the entry of this Decree, Kodak will inform the
appropriate personnel who are responsible for implementing and administering any release or waiver of the requirements of this Decree and amendments to any release or waiver.
Ill. TRAINING
11. Commencing within 60 days and concluding within 365 days of the entry of this Decree, Kodak will provide one hour oftraining to all managers, supervisors, and human resources employees, regarding the laws enforced by the EEOC. Said training will include, at a minimum: (i) the applicability ofthe federal anti-discrimination laws to releases or waivers of claims; (ii) the Commission's regulations on waivers, codified at 29 c.P.R. §1625.22 and 29 C.P.R. §1625.23; (iii) the Commission's Enforcement Guidance on Non~Waivable Employee Rights Under Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) Enforced Statutes, EEOC Notice 915.002 (April 10, 1997), (iv) the Supreme Court's decision in Baker by Thomas v. General Motors Corp., 522 U.S. 222 (1998); and (v) the anti-retaliation provisions ofTitle VII and the ADEA. The training shall be developed by working closely with Nixon Peabody, LLP, who shall approve its final content.
4

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 5 of 8
IV. NOTICE TO FORMER EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE EXECUTED WAIVERS AND EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE RECEIVED BUT NOT YET EXECUTED WAIVERS 12. Within 30 days of the entry of this Decree, Kodak will send a copy ofa letter, in
the fonn appended as Attachment A, to the last known address of all former employees who signed a release pursuant to Kodak's Termination Allowance Plan ("TAP"), explaining that it would not be used by Kodak to prevent employees from asSisting other individua1s or entities (including but not limited to the EEOC) with their claims of discrimination in any fashion.
13. Within 120 days ofthe entry of this Decree, Kodak will conduct a reasonable review of any other centrally maintained severance agreements executed within the past five years of the date of this Decree, and send a copy of a letter, in the form appended as Attachment A, to the last known address of all former employees who signed such agreements which contain what could be considered a nonassistance provision, explaining that such provision would not be used by Kodak to prevent employees from assisting other individuals or entities (including but not limited to the EEOC) with their claims of discrimination in any fashion.
14. Within ten days ofthe entry of this Decree, Kodak will infonn employees who have received, but not yet executed, TAP Releases or severance agreements, that the Release or agreement would not be used by Kodak to prevent employees from assisting other individuals or entities (including but not limited to the EEOC) with their claims of discrimination in any fashion by mailing a new release or waiver with the revised language in paragraph 9 above, to the last known address ofa11 such employees.
15. Within ten days of the entry of this Consent Decree, Kodak will amend its releases and waivers. as provided in paragraph 9 above, and begin issuing and using such amended releases and waivers to any affected employees.
5

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 6 of 8
V. ANTI.RETALIATION CLAUSE 16. Kodak will not retaliate against the Charging party who filed EEOC Charge Number
\65-2004-01416 or any other person because that person provided information or assistance, or participated in any other manner, in the filing, investigation. or litigation ofEEOC Charge Number 1652004-01416 or this lawsuit VI. LEGAL COSTS AND FEES
17. The EEOC and Kodak shall each bear their respective attorneys' fees and costs. VII. DURATION OF DECREE
18. With the exception ofParagraphs 7 and 8, this Decree shall remain in effect for two years. Paragraphs 7 and 8 are permanent injunctions.
6

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 7 of 8

VITI. PROOF OF COMPLIANCE 19. Within 30 days ofthe completion ofthe training set forth in Paragraph II ofthls
Decree, an officer of Kodak shall file an affidavit with the Court averring that Kodak has complied with all the terms of this Decree.

OCI ENTERED this _-,G<L__ day of

T. 2006.

UNITED STAT

CT JUDGE

APPROVED AND CONSENTED TO BY THE PARTIES: EQUAL EMPLOYM NT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Regional Attorney. New York District Office 33 Whitehall St., 5th Floor NY, NY 10004-2112 (212) 336-3696 (phone) (212) 336-3623 (fax) Eli zabeth.Grossman@eeoe.gov
EASTMAN KODAK CO ANY

C

R EFENDANT

Kevin Ainsworth

MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C.

Chrysler Center

666 Third Avenue

New York, NY 10017

(212) 692-6766 (phone)

(212) 983-3115 (fax)

JBRubin@mintz.com

7
woe 390793v.i

Case 6:06-cv-06489-CJS Document 2 Filed 10/11/2006 Page 8 of 8
ATTACHMENT A
KODAK NOTICE You are receiving this Notice because you have executed, or are considering executing, a release or waiver in exchange for severance benefits. This Notice is to inform you that nothing in the release or waiver prohibited or prohibits you (1) from filing a charge with or participating in any investigation or proceeding conducted by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or a comparable state or local agency or (2) from assisting any person or entity in the litigation of that person's or entity's claims of discrimination. However, please be advised that, notwithstanding your right to cooperate, participate, or assist in any such an investigation, proceeding, or lawsuit, you have waived, or will be waiving, your right to recover monetary damages in any charge, complaint, or lawsuit filed by you or anyone else on your behalf, and that you have waived your right to file an individual lawsuit against Kodak.
WDC390851v.l

 
 CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:nywd - Docket Report

https://ecf.nywd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?114988777135747-L_...

CLOSED, CLOSED_2006, JWF
U.S. DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK [LIVE] (Rochester)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 6:06-cv-06489-CJS

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Eastman Kodak Assigned to: Hon. Charles J. Siragusa Cause: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Date Filed: 09/29/2006 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Plaintiff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by Elizabeth Grossman U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street 5th Floor New York, NY 10004-2112 (212) 336-3696 Fax: (212) 336-3623 Email: elizabeth.grossman@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Lisa Sirkin U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street 5th Floor New York, NY 10004-2112 (917) 589-2415 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. O'Brien U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission New York District Office 33 Whitehall Street 5th Floor New York, NY 10004-2112 (212) 336-3694 Fax: 212-336-3623 Email: michael.obrien@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

1 of 2

6/1/2007 2:34 PM

CM/ECF LIVE - U.S. District Court:nywd - Docket Report

https://ecf.nywd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?114988777135747-L_...

V. Defendant . Eastman Kodak

Date Filed
09/29/2006
09/29/2006 10/06/2006 10/11/2006

#

Docket Text

1 COMPLAINT against Eastman Kodak , filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(BJB, ) (Entered: 09/29/2006)
Summons Issued as to Eastman Kodak. (BJB, ) (Entered: 09/29/2006)
3 CONSENT DECREE (BJB, ) (Entered: 10/12/2006)
2 CONSENT DECREE. Signed by Hon. Charles J. Siragusa on 10/6/06. (JHF) (Entered: 10/11/2006)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

06/01/2007 15:36:33

PACER Login:

hs0328

Client Code:

Description:

Docket Report

Search Criteria:

Billable Pages: 1

Cost:

eeoc 6:06-cv-06489-CJS 0.08

2 of 2

6/1/2007 2:34 PM