IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

)

EDWARD GREEN,

)

Zavala County Detention Center )

U.S. 83 North Box 100

)

Crystal City, Texas 78839

)

(512) 374-5831,

)

individually and on behalf of )

all others similarly situated, )

)

AND

)

)

ERNEST DEGRAFFIN,

)

Zavala County Jail

)

102 East Dimmit Street

)

Crystal City, Texas 78839

)

(512) 374-2559,

)

individually and on behalf of )

all others similarly situated, )

)

Plaintiffs,

)

v·

)1

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA,

)

c/o Herbert 0. Reid, Sr.,

)

Acting Corporation Counsel

)

District of Columbia

)

District Building

)

Washington, D.C. 20004

)

(202) 727-6248

)

)

AND

)

)

WALTER B. RIDLEY, Director

)

D.C. Department of Corrections )

1923 Vermont Avenue, N.W.

)

Room N-2 03

)

Washington, D.C. 20001,

)

(202) 673-7316

)

)

Defendants.

)

)

E>5 A p R 1990 Civil Action No.
JJ£- (79;>
HOOAN,J. TFH

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
Green v. District of Columbia

PC-DC-0014-0001

- 2-
Preliminary Statement 1. Plaintiffs bring this class action on behalf of all persons convicted of crimes under the lavs of the District of Columbia who are or will be inmates in non-federal correctional institutions not operated by the District (hereinafter, "Receiving Facilities"). 2. Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and 28 U.S.C. § 2201 to remedy the violations by defendants of plaintiffs' rights under the Fifth and Eighth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. 3. Specifically, plaintiffs seek relief from the constant and systemic violations of their rights by the defendants' use of grossly deficient procedures for the provision of medical care and the deliberate indifference of the defendants to the class members' serious medical needs. In addition, plaintiffs seek relief from the lack of legal resources (including but not limited to law books on District of Columbia law) that are minimally necessary to ensure meaningful access to the courts. Plaintiffs further seek relief from being deprived without due process of law of access to educational and vocational programs and the opportunity to earn educational good time credits by participating

- 3-
in such programs. jurisdiction and Venue
4. This action is brought pursuant to 4 2 U.S.C. § 1983. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343. This Court is authorized to grant declaratory relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and 2202.
5. Venue is proper pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § l39l(b).
Background 6. In a limited effort to relieve overcrowding in District of Columbia prisons, the Council of the District of Columbia on July 12, 1988, approved the Authorization to Enter the Interstate Corrections Compact Emergency Act of 1988 (the "Emergency Act"). Marion S. Barry, Mayor of the District of Columbia, approved the Emergency Act, and it became effective on August 1, 1988, and remained in effect until October 30, 1988. 7. The purpose of the Emergency Act was to authorize the Mayor of the District of Columbia to enter into contracts with one or more states to send persons incarcerated in the correctional institutions of the District of Columbia to correctional institutions located in the contracting states.

- 4-
8. On September 27, 1988, the Council of the District of Columbia approved the Authorization to Enter an Interstate Corrections Compact Temporary Act of 1988 (the "Temporary Act"). As with the Emergency Act, the purpose of the Temporary Act was to further relieve overcrowding by authorizing the Mayor to enter into additional contracts for the transfer of D.C. prisoners to correctional institutions in contracting states. Mayor Barry approved this Act on October 13, 1988, and it became effective on May 10, 1989. It expired on December 21, 1989.
9. Pursuant to these Acts, the District of Columbia in late 1988 began to enter into contracts with certain states and with individual correctional institutions in certain states. By March of 1990, the District of Columbia entered into numerous contracts and pursuant thereto has transferred D.C. inmates to approximately 30 Receiving Facilities located in Texas, Washington, Nevada, Missouri, Tennessee, and Virginia. Approximately 850 persons who were incarcerated in the District of Columbia's correctional facilities are currently incarcerated in these Receiving Facilities.
10. On information and belief, the contracts are all substantially similar and contain identical, or nearly identical, terms and conditions. Each contract provides that the prisoners, although transferred to

- 5-
Receiving Facilities, remain under the jurisdiction and control of the Department. Each contract also contains detailed provisions regulating the terms and conditions of the inmates' confinement, including such subjects as training and employment, discipline, law libraries, provision of medical care, drug counselling and drug awareness programs, recreation, and classification of inmates. An example of these contracts, between the District of Columbia and Zavala County Detention Center, is attached hereto at Exhibit A.
Parties 11. Plaintiff Edward Green, D.C.D.C. #168-980, was convicted for violations of the District of Columbia Code on December 13, 1988, and sentenced to a term of incarceration. On February 28, 1989, he was transferred from the Central Facility at the Lorton Correctional Complex to the Zavala County Detention Center in Crystal City, Texas. On September 10, 1989, plaintiff was transferred to the Moore County Jail in Dumas, Texas, and on October 20, 1989, he was transferred back to the Zavala County Detention Center, where he is now incarcerated. 12. Plaintiff Ernest DeGraffin, D.C.D.C. #164-392, was convicted for a violation of the District of Columbia Code on October 5, 1988, and sentenced to a term of 4-12 years incarceration. On March 23, 1989, he

- 6-
was transferred from the Occoquan Facility at the Lorton Correctional Complex to the Zavala County Detention Center in Crystal City, Texas. On October 19, 1989, he was transferred to the Zavala County Jail, also in Crystal City, Texas, where he is now incarcerated.
13. Defendant District of Columbia is responsible for the confinement, care, treatment, and rehabilitation of persons convicted of crimes under the laws of the District of Columbia.
14. Defendant Walter B. Ridley is the Director of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections ("Department"). The Department is responsible for the safekeeping, care, protection, instruction, discipline, and rehabilitation of all persons committed to correctional institutions operated by the Department. As Director of the Department, defendant Ridley is responsible for the direction, supervision, and control of the Department and for the promulgation and enforcement of rules, regulations, policies, and practices of the Department. Defendant Ridley is sued in his official capacity.
Facts 15. Mr. Green has pending before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia an action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983,

- 7-
-een v. Thornburgh. et al.. Civil Action No. 89-1591, in which he is representing himself pro se.
16. Mr. Green is also appearing pro se in connection with two motions pending before the Superior Court of the District of Columbia: a motion for correction of an illegal sentence pursuant to Super. Ct. Crim. R. 35(a), and a motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to Super. Ct. Crim. R. 35(b).
17. The legal resources available to Mr. Green are insufficient to enable him to adequately represent himself in these pending actions.
18. There are no educational or vocational programs available to Mr. Green. Through such programs, Mr. Green could earn educational good time credits which would be applied to the minimum term of his imprisonment to determine the date when he is eligible for release on parole, and to the maximum term of his imprisonment to determine the date when his release on parole becomes mandatory. While incarcerated at the Central Facility, Mr. Green participated in the Advanced Street Law Class for which he would have earned educational good time credits. However, he was unable to complete the program due to his transfer to the Zavala County Detention Center.
19. Mr. DeGraffin has pending before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia an

- 8-
action under the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1983, DeGraffin v. Thornburgh. et al.. Civil Action No. 89-1553, in which he is representing himself pro se.
20. Mr. DeGraffin is also appearing pro se in an appeal from denial of his motion for reduction of sentence, DeGraffin v. United States. App. No. 89-562, now pending before the District of Columbia Court of Appeals.
21. The legal resources available to Mr. DeGraffin at the Zavala County Detention Center and the Zavala County Jail have been insufficient to enable him to adequately represent himself in these pending actions. Indeed, the Zavala County Jail has no law library whatsoever.
22. There are no educational or vocational programs available to Mr. DeGraffin. Through such programs, Mr. DeGraffin could earn educational good time credits which would be applied to the minimum term of his imprisonment to determine the date when he is eligible for release on parole, and to the maximum term of his imprisonment to determine the date when his release on parole becomes mandatory. While incarcerated at the Occoguan Facility, Mr. DeGraffin was enrolled in a general business course for which he would have earned educational good time credits. However, he was unable

- 9-
to complete the program due to his transfer to the Zavala County Detention Center.
23. On or about October 11, 1989, Mr. DeGraffin was assaulted while incarcerated at the Zavala County Detention Center. Mr. DeGraffin sustained a serious head injury as well as two black eyes, damage to his back and ribs, and loss of a tooth. Since the assault, Mr. DeGraffin has suffered from constant head pain. On or about December 8, 1989, a doctor recommended that Mr. DeGraffin receive a neurological evaluation. Despite repeated requests, Mr. DeGraffin has not yet received such an evaluation.
Class Action Allegations 24. This action is brought as a class action pursuant to Rules 23(a) and 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 25. Plaintiffs sue on behalf of all persons convicted of crimes under the laws of the District of Columbia who are or will be inmates in Receiving Facilities pursuant to contracts entered into by the District of Columbia. 26. The class of plaintiffs currently consists of approximately 850 persons. It is so numerous that joinder of all its members is impracticable. 27. The conditions and practices that are the bases of this complaint, and the questions of law

- 10 -
involving the violation of constitutional rights by those conditions and practices, are common to all members of the class.
28. The constitutional violations are systemic, affecting the class as a whole. Plaintiffs' claims are typical of the claims of the class and plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. Plaintiffs are represented by counsel who are experienced in civil litigation, class actions, and in litigation on behalf of inmates of correctional institutions.
29. Defendants District of Columbia and Walter B. Ridley have acted or refused to act under color of law on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive and declaratory relief with respect to the class.
COUNT I (Medical Care — Eighth Amendment) 30. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1-29 of the Complaint. 31. Defendants have expressly limited the conditions under which the Receiving Facilities may provide medical, psychiatric, and dental care (hereinafter, "medical care") to D.C. inmates. In the contracts, defendants have authorized the Receiving

- 11 -
Facilities to provide only those medical services that are of an emergency nature or that are available from in-house staff personnel. Before incurring any other medical, psychiatric, or dental expenses in caring for the health of the inmates, the Receiving Facilities must engage in a lengthy and time-consuming procedure of seeking and obtaining approval in writing from defendants for the proposed treatment.
32. The medical care provisions of the contracts are designed to give defendants continued fiscal control over the medical treatment of the inmates even after they have been transferred hundreds and sometimes thousands of miles away from the District. By requiring preapproval before medical care can be provided, defendants have in the past and continue to delay, restrict, and deny the provision of care for the serious medical needs of the inmates.
33. Specifically, the medical care provisions of the contracts and the practices of the defendants have resulted in and will continue to result in systemic and lengthy delays in providing inmates both with access to medical personnel capable of evaluating their need for treatment and with treatment once it is recommended. These delays have in turn resulted in severe pain and suffering serving absolutely no penological purpose.

- 12 -
34. On information and belief, in many cases defendants have refused to approve treatment recommended for inmates by local medical specialists. On information and belief, defendants have also often failed to make any response at all to requests for approval. The refusal of defendants to approve treatment or respond to requests for approval has further resulted in severe pain and suffering lacking any possible penological purpose.
35. The procedures by which medical care is provided are deficient, deprive the inmates of necessary health care, and represent deliberate indifference to the inmates' serious medical needs. The inadequacy of the inmates' medical care renders conditions of their confinement incompatible with contemporary standards of decency, causes unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain and suffering, and is not reasonably related to any legitimate government objective. Inmates are thereby subjected to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
COUNT II (Law Books — Access to Courts) 36. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1-29 of the Complaint.

- 13 -
37. The defendants have failed to provide the inmates at the Receiving Facilities with minimum legal resources necessary to ensure effective access to courts.
38. Specifically, defendants have failed to provide the inmates with books on District of Columbia law necessary for bringing claims seeking new trials, release from confinement, or vindication of fundamental civil rights. The defendants have further refused to provide inmates with law books on District of Columbia law sufficient to allow them adequately to bring, defend, and otherwise participate in other general civil legal matters.
39. The defendants have further failed to ensure that the libraries available to the inmates are adequately supplied with other law books, such as the various federal reporters, Shepards Citations, United States Code Annotated, general reference works on criminal law, prisoner rights books, federal rules, local D.C. rules, D.C. prison regulations, forms adequate to assert habeas corpus and civil rights claims, and legal dictionaries.
40. The inmates lack meaningful access to
avenues of legal aid other than self help. Except with
respect to this class lawsuit, they are generally without counsel.

- 14 -
41. The defendants' failure to provide adequate law books or other sources of legal aid deprives the inmates of their right to meaningful access to the courts in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
COUNT III (Educational Programs — Due Process) 42. Plaintiffs reallege and incorporate herein by reference paragraphs 1-29 of the Complaint. 43. The contracts between the District of Columbia and the Receiving Facilities govern the control, custody, and care of D.C. prisoners. The contracts serve an essential government function, are binding on the defendants, and for all practical purposes have the force and effect of D.C. law. 44. On information and belief, all, or virtually all of the contracts require the Receiving Facilities to provide educational and vocational programs, including but not limited to Adult Basic Education and General Equivalency Diploma or similar high school equivalency or literacy programming. 45. Pursuant to D.C. Code § 24-429, the successful completion of the educational and vocational programs required to be provided by the contracts would entitle transferred D.C. prisoners to educational good

- 15 -
time credits. Educational good time credits are statutory credits applied to the prisoner's minimum term of imprisonment to determine the date when he is eligible for release on parole, and to the maximum term of his imprisonment to determine the date when his release on parole becomes mandatory.
46. By the terms of the contracts inmates at the Receiving Facilities have acquired property and liberty interests in having access to educational and vocational programs required by the contracts and thus the opportunity to earn educational good time credits.
47. Inmates at the Receiving Facilities have generally not been provided the educational and vocational programs required by the contracts.
48. By refusing to ensure that eligible inmates are provided with educational and vocational programs, and thus the opportunity to earn educational good time credits, defendants have deprived the inmates of their property and liberty interests without due process guaranteed by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
RELIEF Wherefore, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, plaintiffs request that this Court grant the following relief:

- 16 -
a. Certify this matter as a class action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23;
b. Declare that the procedure by which medical care is provided to the inmates at the Receiving Facilities violates plaintiffs' rights under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and permanently enjoin defendants, their officers, agents, employees and successors in office, as well as those acting in concert and participating with them, from requiring the Receiving Facilities to make requests and obtain approvals from defendants before incurring medical, psychiatric, or dental expenses for the care of inmates of the Receiving Facilities;
c. Declare that defendants' failure to provide adequate law books or other sources of legal aid deprives plaintiffs of their rights to meaningful access to the courts, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and permanently enjoin defendants, their officers, agents, employees and successors in office, as well as those acting in concert and participating with them, to provide to the Receiving Facilities, for use by inmates at the Receiving Facilities, law books sufficient to enable inmates at the Receiving Facilities to conduct legal research for (a) bringing claims seeking new trials, release from confinement, and vindication of fundamental civil

- 17 -
rights; and (b) bringing, defending, and otherwise participating in other general civil legal matters;
d. Declare that defendants' refusal to ensure that the Receiving Facilities provide plaintiffs with adequate educational and vocational programs violates plaintiffs' rights to due process guaranteed by the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution; and permanently enjoin defendants, their officers, agents, employees and successors in office, as well as those acting in concert and participating with them, to require the Receiving Facilities to institute educational and vocational programs for the inmates at the Receiving Facilities, including but not limited to Adult Basic Education and General Equivalency Diploma or similar high school equivalency or literacy programming;
e. Permanently enjoin defendants, their officers, agents, employees and successors in office, as well as those acting in concert and participating with them, from sending persons convicted of crimes under the laws of the District of Columbia to Receiving Facilities and from keeping inmates at such facilities unless and until defendants have complied with the terms of this Court's order;
f. Retain jurisdiction of this matter until this Court's order has been carried out;

- 18 -
g. Award plaintiffs their reasonable costs and
attorneys' fees, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and
h. Grant such other relief as the Court deems
just and proper.
ARNOLD & PORTER
/I
Murray K. Garnick D.C. Bfrf #399260 Mary B. DeRosa D.C. Bar #405774 Helene B. Madonick D.C. Bar #414850 Cathy A. Hoffman D.C. Bar #419124 Hilde E. Kahn D.C. Bar #416998
1200 New Hampshire Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20036 202-872-6700
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Of Counsel:
Grace M. Lopes D.C. Bar #358650 Jonathan K. Smith D.C. Bar #396578
D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. 1400 20th Street, N.W. , Suite 117 Washington, D.C. 20036 202-775-0323
Arthur B. Spitzer D.C. Bar #235960 Elizabeth Symonds D.C. Bar #358931

- 19 -
American Civil Liberties Union Fund of the National Capital Area 1400 20th Street, N.w., Suite 119 Washington, D.C. 20036 202-457-0800
Dated: April 5, 1990

CONTRACT

BETWEEN

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

AND

THE COUNTY OF ZAVALA

FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE

INTERSTATE CORRECTIONS COMPACT ACT
In consideration of the cooperative relationship herewith undertaken in the confinement, care, treatment and rehabilitation of inmates on an interstate basis and in further consideration of services to be performed and benefits to be derived by each of the parties hereto in the strengthening of their respective correctional programs, the undersigned District of Columbia, The County of Zavala, acting by their duly constituted authorities, and pursuant to and to implement the Interstate Corrections Compact enacted by each of the parties, as follows:

District of Columbia:

District of Columbia Interstate Compact Emergency Act of 1988

County of Zavala State of Texas

Local Government Code, Vernons Civil Statutes

do hereby covenant and agree as follows:

1. INTERSTATE CORRECTIONS COMPACT:
The provisions of the Interstate Corrections Compact are hereby made an integral part of this Contract and no provisions of this contract . shail be construed in any manner inconsistent with said Compact.

2. COVERNINC LAW:

Except where expressly otherwise provided in this contract or by law, the laws ana administrative rules and regulations of the sending state shall govern in any matter relating to an inmate confined pursuant to this contract and the Interstate Corrections Compact.

3. TERMINOLOCY:

All terms defined in the Interstate Corrections Compact and used in this contract shall have the same meanings in this contract as in said Compact. The "sending, «tate" shall mean the District of Columbia. The "receiving state1 shall mean County of Zavala, State of Texas. The terms "sending state" and "receiving state" shall be construed to include and refer to the appropriate official or agency thereof in each particular case.

D L R A T 10 S

This contract shall enter into full force ana effect upon the Cõte both parties hereto shall have signed this contract, and shall continue tr,rouçn F e b r u a r y 1, 1990 unless terminated by notice from either party in accoraance with Section 5 of this contract, it may be renewed by the parties involved under such terms and conditions, and for such additional period as mutually determined.

5.

TERMINATION:

T h i s contract may be terminated by written notice of either p a r t y . That termination shall become effective ninety (90) days after receipt of said notice. Within t h i r t y (30) days after receipt of said notice, the sending state shall accept delivery of its inmates in the institution designated by the receiving state.

6.

OTHER ARRANCEMENTS UNAFFECTED:

Nothing contained in this contract shall be construed to abrogate or impair any agreement or contract for the confinement, rehabilitation or treatment of inmates now in effect between the parties to this contract.

7.

MAILING ADDRESS:

All notices, reports, billings, and correspondence to the respective states to this contract shall be sent to the following:

District of Columbia:

District of Columbia Department of Corrections Hallem H . Williams, Jr. Director 1923 Vermont A v e n u e , N . N . District of Columbia 20001 Attn: Patricia Britton

County of Zavala.

County Judge Zavala County Courthouse Crystal C i t y , Texas ¯8839
and
2avaia County Detention Center U S 63 N . Box 100 Crystal C i t y , Texas ?883S
Attention: Kenneth Kelley

8.

R I G H T OF INSPECTION :

T h e sending state shall have the right to inspect, at all reasonable times, any institution of the receiving state in which inmates of the sending state are confined in order to determine if that institution maintains standards of care and discipline not incompatible with those of the sending state and that all inmates therern-are treated equitably, regardless of race, religion, color, creed, or national origin.

• ¿C Asç ; E5

T h e r e c e i v i n g stête h e r e b y u n a e r t a k e s to make available to the senair.ç s t a t e such places for inmates as may be v a c a n t from time to time in d e s i g n s t e c institutions of the receiving state made available for sucn confinement by the laws of t h e r e c e i v i n g s t a t e .

The Zavala County Detention Center shall accept 226 inmates and the Zavala C o u n t y Jail shall accept 60 inmates a n d may accept 7 additional inmates. It is u n d e r s t o o d that t h e Z a v a l a C o u n t y D e t e n t i o n F a c i l i t i e s f u l l c a p a c i t y a r e available for the District of Columbia's exclusive use anc will be billed accordingly. T h e District of Columbia shall use its best efforts to keep both facilities at `öO¾ c a p a c i t y d u r i n g t h i s c o n t r a c t .

`O.

APPLICATION:

The sending state will submit a separate application to the receiving state for each individual inmate proposed for confinement.

Said application shall consist of the following: Full information and all necessary documents relating to the case history, physical and clinical records, judicial and administrative rulings, and order relating or pertinent to the inmate and the sentence pursuant to which confinement is to be had or to continue, reasons for the requested transfer, identification data, photographs, and fingerprints. Placement will be deferred until approved by the receiving stat(

The receiving state may screen the applications of each individual inmate proposed for confinement at the inmate's present place of confinement or the sending state's central office. The on-site screening shall be at the expense of the sending state, and shall be in addition to costs due pursuant to paragraphs 27 and 28 below.

11.

DELIVERY OF INMATE :

Upon receipt of the acceptance of the application, the sending state, at its expense, will deliver the inmate to the institution in the receiving state, aesiçnated by the receiving state, together with the original or a duly authenticated copy of his/her commitment and any other official papers or documents authorizing detention, case file materials, and medical records. Whenever there is to be mutual exchange of inmates between the parties of this contract, the authorities of one of the states may act as an agent of the other state for purposes of transferring its inmates so that the expense to both states may be mimmizea.

`2.

TRANSFER OF FUNDS:

Funds due transferred inmates shall be provided by the sending state to be credited to the account of the transferred inmate by the receiving state. Upon return of the inmate to the sending state, the receiving state shall provide funds in the amount due the inmate at the time of r e t u r n .

!ESPOS'SIE!LITV FOR OFFENDERS CUSTODY
It shall be the resDOns¡Dihty of the a d m i n i s t r a t i o n of the i n s t i t u t i o n in the receiving state tc confine inmates from a senamg state; to give them care and treatment, including the furnishing of subsistence and aii necessary medical anü hoscita¡ services and supplies; to provide for their physical nee¤s, to make available to tr`.em the programs of t r a i n i n g ana treatment comDarabie tc those p r o v t d e ¤ to inmates of the receiv¡no state, to retain them in safe c u s t o c y , to supervise them; to maintain proper discipline and c o n t r o l ; to make c e r t a i n that they receive no special p r i v i l e g e s and that the sentences ana oraers of the commuting court in the sending state are faithfully executed. Eut n o t n i n ç herein contained snal¡ be c o n s t r u e d to require the receiving state or any of its institutions to provide treatment, facilities, or programs for any inmate confined pursuant to the Interstate Corrections Compact which it coes not p r o v i d e for similar inmates not confined p u r s u a n t to said Compact.
I". MEDICAL SERVICES:
A. Inmates from the sending state shall receive such medical, psychiatric anc d e n t a l treatment as may be necessary to s a f e g u a r d t h e i r health and promote t h e i r a d j u s t m e n t as s e l f - s u p p o r t i n g members of the community upon release. Unless an emergency is i n v o l v e d , the r e c e i v i n g state shall contact the sending state for advance authority, in writing, before incurring medical, psychiatric, or dental expenses for which the sending state is responsible under the terms of this contract, unless the sending authorities gave express written authority in advance to the receiving s t a t e . In an e m e r g e n c y , the receiving state may proceed with the necessary treatment without prior authority, but in every such case the receiving state shall notify the sending state immediately and furnish full information regarding the nature of the illness, the type of treatment to be p r o v i d e d , and the estimated cost t h e r e o f .
E. When medical, psychiatric, or dental care or treatment -ecuires the removal of the inmate from the i n s t i t u t i o n , the inmate shall be removed only after notification to the sending state, unless the sending authority gave e x p r e s s e d w r i t t e n advance a u t h o r i t y to same a u t h o r i t i e s in receiving state. In the event of en emeraency which does not permit p r i o r notification, the i n s t i t u t e she¡i n o t i f y the sending state as promptly t h e r e a f t e r as p r a c t i c a b l e . All necesse p r e c a u t i o n s shall be taken to assure the safekeeping of the inmate while h e / s h e is absent from the normal place of confinement. Necessary custcc>a( supervision shall bt provided by the receiving state.
C . A n y cost of medical, p s y c h i a t r i c , or dental service shall be c o n s i d e r normal costs incidental to the operations of the institution in the receiving state if the service is rendered by staff personnel and in regularly maintained facilitie; o p e r a t e d o r u t i l i z e d by the i n s t i t u t i o n as p a r t of the health or correctional p r o ç r ; thereof and if the inmate requires no special medication, d r u g s , equipment, anesthetics, s u r g e r y , or nursing care in addition to that commonly available on any infirmary basis the cost of any special services (including off-site contractec services), medication, chargeable to the sending state.
15. T R A I N I N G OR EMPLOYMENT;
A. Inmates from the sending state shall be a f f o r d e d the o p p o r t u n i t y a^c shaî¡ be r e q u i r e o to p a r t i c i p a t e m programs of occupational t r a i n i n g anc m c u s t riêl or e t h e r work en the same basis as inmates of the r e c e i v i n g s t a t e . Compensation ir`, c o n n e c t i o n witn any sucr, p õ r t i c ¡ c a t ion ( w h e t h e r as payment, mcen;¡»e.

or for ôny ct r.er t"`erãDeutic or renabilitõtive reason) shalí be paic to inmates of the sencm¤ state on the same basis as inmates of the receivinc state. Any sucn inmates of the senaing state snail be subiect to the regûier work discipline imposed upon other inmate participants in the particular program. However, nothing contained herein shall be construea to permit or require any inmate of a sending state to participate in any training, i n d u s t r i a l , or other work program contrary to the law of the sending state.
B. The receiving state shall have the right to dispose of all products produced by an inmate, snail retain all proceeds therefrom, and snail bear all costs of saití program.
C. In the case of handicraft of hobbycraft programs, the inmate shall have the ngnt to dispose of the products of his/her labor and to retain the proceeds of any sale of his/her work in accordance with the rules of the receiving state.
16. DISCIPLINE:
The receiving state, as an agent for the sending state, shall have the physical control over and power to exercise disciplinary authority over all inmates from the sending state. However, nothing contained herein shall be construed to authorize or permit the imposition of a type of discipline prohibited by the laws of the sending state.
17. LAWS AND REGULATIONS:
Inmates, while in the custody of the receiving state, shall be subject to all provisions of law and regulations applicable to persons committed for violations of law of the receiving state not inconsistent with the sentence imposed.
18. RECORDS AND REPORTS FROM RECEIVING STATE:
A. Within ninety (90) days following the receipt of an inmate from the sending state, the receiving state snail furnish an admission summary and classification study report outJinin¤ and vocational findings and indicating the institutional program which has been recommended. Thereafter, preferably at intervals of six (6) months, but at least annually, the receiving state sha¡¡ furnish the senaing state a report giving a summary of the inmate's progress and adjustment since the last report. All such reports shali be forwarded to the sending state.
B. The superintendent or other administrative head of an institution., in which inmates from the sending state are confined, shall keep all necessary and pertinent records concerning such inmates in a manner agreed between the sending and receiving states. During the inmate's confinement in the i n s t i t u t i o n , the sending state shall be entitled to receive, and upon request shall be furnished with, copies of any such record or records. But nothing herein contained shall be construed to prevent the receiving state or any institution thereof from keeping copies of any such record or records upon and after termination of confinement.

' 9 . REMOVAL FROV. I N S T I T U T I O N
An inmate from the sending state legally confined in the institution of the receiving state snail not be removed therefrom by any person without an order from the sending state. This subdivision shall not apply to an emergency necessitating the immediate removal of the inmate for medical, c e n t a l , or psychiatric treatment, or to a removal made necessary by fire. flood, earthquake or other catastrophe or conditions presenting imminent danger to the safety of the inmate. In the case of any removal for sucn emergency cause, the receiving state shall inform the sending state of the wnereabouts of the inmate or inmates so removed at the earliest practicable time and shall exercise all reasonable care for the safekeeping and custody of such inmate or inmates.
:o. HEARINCS:
The receiving state shall provide adequate facilities for any hearing by authorities of the senamg state, to wn¡ch an inmate may be entitle by the lews of the sending state. Upon the request of the sending state, the authorities of the receiving state will be authorized to and will conduct any such hearings, prepare and submit the record of said hearings, together with any recommendations of the hearing officials, to the officer or officers of the sending state before whom the hearing would have been had if it had taken place in the sending state.
21. INTERINSTITUTIONAL TRANSFERS:
Notwithstanding any provision hereof to the contrary, the receiving state may transfer an inmate from one institution u n d e r its control to another whenever it deems such action appropriate; p r o v i d e d , however, no inmate's custody status will be reduced to minimum custody without the prior written consent of the senamg state. Notice of any t r a n s f e r shall immeaiately be sent to the sending state.
::. ESCAPE:
In case any such inmate shall escape from the custody of the receiving state, the receiving state will use all reasonable means to recapture the inmate. The escape shall be reported immediately to the sending state. The receiving state shall have the primary responsibility for and authority to direct the pursuit and retaking of inmates within its own t e r r i t o r y . Any cost in connecticr therewith shall be chargeable to and borne by the receiving state. In the case of an escape to a jurisdiction other than the sending state's or the receiving state's the responsibility for institution of extradition or rendition proceedings shall be that of the sending state, but nothing contained herein shall be construed to prevent or affect the activities of offices and agencies of any jurisdictions directed toward the apprehension and r e t u r n of an escapee.
23. D E A T i t O F INMATE :
A. In the event of the death of an inmate from a sending state, the medical examiner, coroner, or other official having the duties of such an officer m the jurisdiction shall be notified. The sending state shall receive copies cf any records made at or m connection with such notification.

B. The institution m the receiving state shall immediately notify the sending state of the aeâth of an inmate, furnish information as recueste¤. end follow the instruction of the sending state with regard to the dispositions of the b o d y . The body shall not be released except on order of the appropriate officials of the sending state. All expenses relative to any necessary preparation of the body and shipment or express charges shail be paid by the sending state. The sending and receiving states may arrange to have the receiving state tak¾ care of the burial and all ^natter related or incidental thereto ana sucn expenses shall be paid by the sending state. The provisions of this paragrapn shall govern only the relations between or among the p a r t y states and shall not affect the liability of any relative or other person for the disposition of the deceased or for any expenses connected therewith.
C . T h e sending state shall receive a certified copy of the death certificate for any of its inmates who have died while in the receiving state.
2 4. C R A T U T I E S AND EXPENSES ATTENDANT UPON RELEASE:
The provision of clothing gratuities and any other supplies upon release of an inmate shail be at the expense of the sending state and shall be accordance with its law.
25. R E T A K I N G OF INMATES:
T h e receiving state will deliver any of said inmates to the proper offìcals of the sending state upon demand made to the receiving state and presentation of official w r i t t e n authority to receive said inmate.
T h e sending state will retake any inmate, upon the request of the receiving state, within thirty (30) days after receipt of the request to retake.
In case the commitment under which any of said inmates is terminated for any reason, the sending state agrees to accept d e l i v e r y of the prisoner at the institution of the receiving state, and at its expense r e t u r n him to the jurisdiction of the sending state. However, by agreement among the sending and receiving states and the inmate, at the termination of the inmate's confinement by reasons of discharge, conditional or otherwise, the inmate may be released within the jurisdiction of the receiving state.
26. PHOTOCRAPHINC AND PUBLICITY:
Institutional or other officials of the receiving state shall not be authonzec to release publicity concerning inmates from the sending state. They shall not release personal histories or photographs of such inmates or information concemm: their arrivals or departures or permit reporters or photographers to interview or photograph such inmates without the express written permission and upon the request of the inmate. Requests for information regarding inmates of the sending state shall be reftrreti to the sending state. However, information of public records, such as sentence date or information concerning the escape of an inmate. may be given directly to the press by the receiving state. The receiving state may photogra*p*h' inmates from the sending state as means of identification for official use only; however, photographs of an inmate may be disseminated to appropriate law enforcement officials and to the press in the event of any escape from an institution by such inmate.

:?.

COST AND REIMBURSEMENT

The costs to the receiving state of the custody of inmates transferreo under the terms of this contract shall be fixed at the rate of 5U6.50 per inmate per day. The sending state shall be billed monthly by the receiving state. Payment shall be made within t h i r t y (30) days of receipt of the invoice. Payment shall be made by the sending state making payment to County T r e a s u r e r , Zavala County Courthouse, Crystal C i t y , Texas 78839.

2S.

TRANSPORTATION

Any and all costs of transportation i n c u r r e d p r i o r to admission to an institution in the receiving state, and transportation at the time of, or as an incident to release or discharge, conditional or otherwise, an incident to termination of this contract shall be charged to the sending state in addition to any charges due the receiving state under paragraph 27 above.

Z9.

RESPONSIBILITY FOR LEGAL PROCEEDINGS:

The sending state undertakes to defend any action or proceedings involving the custody of any of its inmates. The receiving state shall be reimbursed for any expense it may i n c u r r in connection t h e r e w i t h . However, it shall be the responsibility of the receiving state to defend against any cause of action which may accrue to the inmate by and through the alleged fault of the receiving state.

30.

LAW LIBRARY

The receiving state shall provide the inmates transferred by the sending state the same access to law l i b r a r y materials as inmates of the sending state at the place of confinement. The sending state shall be responsible for providing access to legal materials needed by its t r a n s f e r r e d inmates which cannot be provided t h r o u g h the receiving state's law l i b r a r y .

31.

INTERNAL RELATIONS :

Nothing in this contract shall be construed to effect the internal relations between or among the party states and their subdivisions, officers, departments, or agencies, but each party state undertakes and acknowledges liability and responsibility for making each other party state whole in respect of any obligation imposed upon it by or pursuant to this contract.

32.

CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES:

The sending state shall only send low risk inmates to said facility and the receiving state shall only be required to keep low risk inmates. I f in the opinion of the receiving state said inmates become other than low r i s k the sending state shall immediately after notice take back said inmates at sending states cost.

33. TEXAS COVERNINC LAWS:

T h i s c o n t r a c t is e n t e r e d into u n d e r Local G o v e r n m e n t C o d e , V e r n o n C i v i l S t a t u t e s i n c l u d e d b y not l i m i t e d t o A r t i c l e 3 5 1 . O3tì. 3 5 1 . 0 3 5 , 351.041 a n d 35I.O<*3.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersignec duly authorized officers have subscribed their names on benaif of the District of Columbia, State of Texas County of Zavala :

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

TITLE: ON

(DATE)

r**zj¿ COUNTY OF ZAVALA

TITLE : County Sheriff ON January 13. 1989

DATE)

COUNTY OF ZAVALA SERVICES, INC

TITLE : Councv Judge ON January 13. 1989

(DATE)

TITLE
ON

. y» y

(DATE'

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 613 G Stre«L N.W

r

a. D.C. 20001

CHANGE ORDER^CONTRACT MODIFICATION

ISSUED TO-. (Cotfractar> County, Texas
U.S. c3 ... Box ICO Crystal C i t y . Texas 7b839
AGENCY:

RELATING TO.

Housing or Inmates

P.O. No.
Contract No.
AcLioc No._ Effective

D*ted

D·te:

ACTION: E Change: O Modification: Q Other D Economic Price Adjustment Notice:

In accordance w1tn •'a** 13, A r t i c l e X X I 1 , STA*DA*Ü COï.T¾ACT ERGVISICMS FüK SuP£L·Y AM ¾ ¿ K V I C L S , CHANGES Clause, paragraph ï ö , of¯ tne subject c o n t r a c t , Tne 7õï iowin¾ cnan5es art hereby uaüe.
1. f>i<s* IJ, A r t i c l e J t f l l , STANDARD CONTRACT PkCYlSIÜXS FOR SUPPIT AJ^D StKYICLS,
Attacrvnent 1 , DISPUTLS clause,¯¯µ*ra:jraµ> 1 7 , ü · í e t · paragraphs (A) aito (C) on: rc·J¢si¿nate ^àr^r^h U ) as para«,raµn ( A ) . Ado tne f o l l o w i n g as n e w yarà<¿råpt\% ( ¿ ) a n d ( C ) :
(ri) I f a ci$µute Involves a d a i s by tï\· O l s t r i c t a¾a 1n$t the contractor arising unoer or relating to tne contract, tne contracting ufficer shall f 1 l t . 4 written clale with the Director of the Uepart*ænt of Administrative Services (L>A¿). The clai« shall ba tne subject or èn Infor«el proceeöin¾ ano written üedsion by tne 01 rector, DAS. The decision of U>e Director. ÜAS snail be final ana not subject to review unless an ada1n1strat1ve appeal or •etion for juuicial r t v i w Is timely cocaaenceu ùy the contractor within 90 days frw« the Flµt of a decision üy the U1rector, WAJ, as in Ü.C. Coco, Sec. 1
ite arises unuer or relates to the contract, -tne contractor snail Ct cade 1n writing and
^ 1 the contracting officer for a written decision. contracting officer shall Issue a written oecision on the clai»j witnin Ow uays after the receipt of the claii.t.

ALL OTHER CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS REMAIN UNCHANGED

REASON:

'"*'

AL
DAJM-tll

Of¯ ÎHfe DtSTllCT OF COlUAk. ,A THE NATION? CÂ*TAl BUREAU OF MATERIEL MANAGEMENT

NEGOTIATED SERVICES CONTRACT

DEPARTMENT OF

N. S CONTRACT NO.

.DATED

Sub>·ci to tht terms and condition* on Pap 2 (rtvtm tida). t h · Gov·mm·nt of th· Oittrict of Columbia and th· contractor htrt
contract for th· »·rvie·» o* t h · ounuatu* in tht manntr and for th« ramuntration prtjcrib·d htrtin.
S*ECIRCATION$ OF THí SERVICES
-'^J*-'-`: tw ~.¯.^ tfc*.`5 on¿ c o a ù i t i û u s a¿c. ícrt;:. r.cr*ia, tiií; Cov*m.‰er.t c : t.-.e 2 i ¾ t i i c c : i C'wiunbi«, I h · r · ü ¿ a f t * r , tr*e Tcùuinç Stuc&), utá ¯L«ivala' wcur.cy, TexA_, ( h e r e i n * f t · r , t h · R · c · ì v : ¾ S t a t e ) , :-,c:ory contract for ...i.- J o : v i c e s of t h e Receiving ^tâtc ir. ¯he .¯*.r.^er dr.. : c : tr.e .¯v;.2._j.-¿:¿tr, l·xe»crít`·d i i · r e i n .

OP wow
.'l.e ?.t·ccivinj l u t e khaii provide c&n£-:îc¡£énc, CA:C, :;·c<:;; :t;¯.¿i;..:tic:j.' £¿r lar^t·6 tracsfarreo ~y t:.e Seccit^ : : u t t to ?cc¿iv.;.., Jtacc {Ir^r¿te8). The Rsceivi..i3 í t â t e áhaii , c . í c r : ; «uch :.CÌ,`.>JC:^ *.¿,_.£_ stax.ùaros of care oiid i i s c i r i i c â coí.i^¿-i_io r·it.^ tï-it oi w..c Z<jr.diDç CtÂtJ &nU in such a manner «is to cngure equitable tro«txr.er.c ot o i l luc«c,fc¿, io<ÿôxdle»s of race, r e l i g i o n , e o l e r , «-x ..u : J C : strvicus ¿UAÌ2 include the £ollovia¿t

ftycnwntBb·: ¤ M e n t M y ¤ Upon C«mpMten ¯ Q or · tvdtiuá on MV*

PAYà«INT T f t M l

f»«»«-»«t di(O>wnt W ¢oy·>·»« m

«syt

O'd·r or oth·< oulhon»y.
D·r·«t©r el CONTRACTOR'S * c a n

k·r··nto»f·o*r*r ou·K·nraé fcy

«EOUISITION 10. NO.: CERTIFICATE OP ACCCrTANCE INTO FMS OATf ACCErtTD:

S<9n·iwr· e'
, •¿
M·<lin« t M i · u o( C·ntf·c··r

•»¡*
I Coonty Judgn

Lav-.- Zounij Cwurthou·e, Crystal,.¿lty# TX

«IAil (C·n···ct·' tl«·wW •»·· *·rt·rni 4¿Ve*rv.a wné·> l*»·« o>ntr·ci wn·il Ha c·**r·ct ti·t

1 aw»4^^Ol

-

ACCEPTANCE •T THE DISTRICT:

j

? y>¿

Doi·
•15-¿V
/ 5I2/374-3Ô:Õ

«mrrt-·uRUu or auram

•REZH-IURIAU or H«TÐIICI «AiueiMÐn CAMACT-CONTIUCTOI! on MTNCT MLOEN*OO-DCPUITMEXT or t i t

GENERAL PROVISIONS

Th» torn* lå·war¯. *Comr·cbno O · e · r * . *Acoountne, i ¯Contraa App··H •oanT. and ¯Objbwr ahat msan tw Meyer of t w O·V<o of C¢>umtu t w Convws»ne C·oar · m» O H M of CeMntt· or r u Aumoro·d napraaanbur·< tw Accour·x ¤Êam • t t » Objbis of Ce>ufflM. m · Cont·e Aopaatt ooarcot tw D · m e of C a w — • r * Th· Gowammani of ma Duma or Comma* raacact • ) . 1 1 » m i arm ft an i
<« t corporator,, tw wnr 'eonvaaor ¯ ma* ma·n ¯tw <
2. P*n·wart: Tn« oonvaa may M r·n»we¢ by muna« •or—mam of «w ConcaonçO»o»'md»wConvaaer •jowatoa aJBMryofaopropnaiaot»<ndi Ne enano·t ear tw TWO* r any f w •aoapi a* may b · agraoð upon m •n·ng Dy tw
¦ tr»·ra«c A oonvaa ear b· mnrø*e tor not mer· than mraa •ma· and a·on not ic •io·ad on* y·a>-
Þw*rman» unðar»»»aunBaaiTiayBaiam»naiaaby»<a Dmna «no·« o> m pan mnnw»·t ma Lu»aa¢>ig otl«a< ahaf <aiairiwn •tat «uo`
•· m tna «·ai itmrm¡ at M O a w a . Suert m i i w « w i ø*t M aWaaad »r
for tn· eafauii o« n · uur«aaa or lor t w oomc»ama ot • w D u n g , * t · a a a n to

12. •ja*M'HH1 at W·e·rB· Urt·M a t w - w « orv*om¡ n t » i

..-.->..—

.. .

, , - , - . ..— rn—t-rrrmiiLii initi

i p·nað or mr·» y · a n •tar Irw> t—arrwm unoar tw oonv·a mm pr»aT.» •ne

m·ka tvavtaew to th» Conrac·ng O·war or tm »ohamt6 Baor·»mew.» and tw

OMoa o< MgnoD· Auai ane` Inaeacapn •i af raianrioBM tnot r> trw O · o · of tw

Ccrmaer.tax«tf«ui dr«a onaro« e tw tkana. M n>· • o o u . ntoam. aacumma

md arrwr a«Oarm b a i n ç on tíw oaa> and •ap·n·a· of t w oonvaon unoar ma

11. tr>ametwii a< •acMUa· Th· Oi»»%a r * · » v · i tw nçru ic «waaa tw Convaotar > faaak·· prior «c ma awaro of I oonvaa or • any iirw Ounnç t w M· of tw

14. Law* an* I

a bwjafa·ra*M` by Walaiamw Tha pnjwaoni of tw raguiaiorM m·oa punKiant k> %ma Aeu. •n> i>·n·>r e

(•) Comraa Mark Haun and Sat·t? Suno·n)§ Aa i«o U S C 3Z7-3X i (bl M · · r v H · a i y · g B · c C o n t · c · A e A«tof Ji«w3O i n e . a M V 4 t S t a l 2036 u
•nwnð·C I A N M omy • n · r oonvaa · S1O.000 or mar· ) ICI S·rvto> Convaa Aa o> I M S . M •mondad

tf«« paragrapfi muai M oroa«ae

(2) Th» CuifbWn wt.tr>tå by ¢r en banaf •f ffw

• » · v · of auen pro<r·Bgn at ffva i or»>crwa of t w «anw or any om
rxvvae·onbr·wC^r»·d·ri«O·taararbym·M·y«^aon·tu·d···»·rvv«
O· 9Ét QOnftVfl Of 9 9t^f O^BS^ft W S t O i UnSaW ^ ¢ É4ffH nfll OBflR O H M n O Or n B B y l O T ) ^ · HP»»^Br Wf W^ W·VlbT«SBVTf \»*à^D^ W WW H · f «
7 OlbWlM^C4WSfM' •^•bMÉSttS>V^«O C ' ïbytw
i ••y Vw O·WMBBP M m M>ty (30| ot¶ri w I H •n·) •ntf aonauar«· «on tw
I of tw oonvaa
& ABk·m ã ^ ^ k . ^ — — A K B f c ^ h B ^ B A J ^ •M^hB^B½ a^BVJÉBãWÌ fB^>ah iBAaBMã. AHBBBBBB^LkaBBf ^temMtoBMhai ^b**MB-ì M ^ * JÉ·Bk«B.vakTkiBafe ^B¶ ^bk«B
'H in· ^r·#ni no spow w W I V I T B T I ra •»?•» i^v^bWv n w ‰ F V > ww wBaWitãv vw
:Th·
4nc ( I of a aAeat‰ aoam M trom or b·aaø on. or aa a

(<ì Th» Cont»3er • ·

•coa*>to• I booka. r·eoro> •nd • t w Conv·o>no O·o·r. or ha •o·nu. tfw O·o» e>

IS) In ma • • • • ot • t · Cum a m i » non-oome··nBa *·r< t w 9 DM QVwKL W

(i) MwtwpoteyoftwO>a>iaOo»>H'»iwnit>aiw»nofity - "** i-1 * • ' " * • *
ID ua· n * oa·t aHomtocarry out • » • ao»ey r ma
««i ma ftOMn a·

11. •n«ioya· •< tw OHbWI anaf ba
• t may ana* twralraH
1 •t · !·hatb·*að.anertt
mao· • * ` . · eorporaaor.tatn aanar» barw*

o> raea. er·M. aaor. • o ·
aha( not b · bmoVi« teen • » Owano nor f * r · mm s any o*r»> or o·mand aoa>nai %m D a n a w « «xro«·¢ by I h · M·y«r e> tw Ckara of COwma·
It. Tn· Cow B O P ana* be * •twt eomp·anc· •«n C C L«> 2`&3 Oav>a c OW· Conva Aa e>

¿o*rrmuA

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TMt HATIOMt CAOTAi.
MATERIEL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

N.S. CONTRACT NO. 9299-*A-K=
CON¯mACTOrS NAME AND AOOAE88

AMENDMENT NO SPEaF»CA¯noNí>OF THE SERVICES

DATED

1. T:.c Receiving State shall ;T.ÎJI5 tr.at laTd:is ^a -ffcr-ed t»¯.t cp¿·o. tuüiuy ar.j ¿.iall oe rt^uircù tc participate in ;,rcgraits of x c u ^ a t i o n d i trainiaç dj» ¿nLu¿trial or ctn<r work as i s available ic tr.¿ ?.ec¢íivin¾ Ctate on the JJ»¯-C -JÌ»Ì¢ &J I n r ¿ t · s u£ the ?.eceivi.. State. The Rcccivinç Scatc ji^âll rrovide co£-*>ea*atice to Inmates _:`. the sa...e basis ac Ir.:atec cf C.··«Í Receívii:¿· £tate in connection wi:'.-. any cuch i>art ic ipation (wá«Êt;ior a¿ ;`ãy::¯.ent, i n c e n t i v e , or for any other c¿xia,-`eutic· or rehaJbilitÄtivc r_dson). Xoy such Inaatee s.¯ial 1 *;e :u--;cct t¿ ;iit ;c*uiftr wor!; ...JC inline ir.pcsc¿ u`poc other Ic&atè particii¯.¿jits in the particular prc¾ra.'u. ¡íowever, ncthinç container .herein ^hall bo construed to ¡r^rr.`.it or require any l¿n¿te to p a r t i c i p a t e in any training, ir-Jujtrial, cr cth*r work ;rogr&u contrary to the law cí íL·c £ar.i.in¾¯
7¯;.«í Receiving St&t« sl¯i¿li have tne ri^nt to ciaposa of a l l c-¯ >¿o%iucec: -;y .in In.*.^to. si·ail rctcin a l l proceed- therefror.
ana dhali bear a i l C ; L : : cf J-^-J prog razz.
3· In cl.e ca_sc jf l^icàicrcft ¿r l^>^by c r a f t r·rotì-¿--'-^» the In-¯r sha l l hav·ffe thu ri¿ht tc Uicçoae of the products c£ hi:»/hfcr ia^ûr to r e t ai i n tue proceöddû or «Lny w<*i ie c í r ààs/ hhc r work in icccr«-ar.ce witr¿ the r u ì c s cf tr.c ?.ôceivij.j ÍTtatd.

2.

.:ISCZ?LI.M;

The ? . c c e i v . c ; C`:z'.c, „¿ . . . »ÿ¿n: c í t:.ü îv3:.Jir.r ; t c t · 2 , - i j i l

ijv·.` >i¿y»ical : c . : : . 1 c v e i w.:_ C a r `¯.. i x t i ; . j ¿ J Ì . c .;• 1 _.¯.-r y

;¯.-itLcr¿ty OVCL -11 l.·J¯`»_cc. .

.._`Vi.-.¯, r . ; ; ; . . ^ d l ¿ i

: . « _ . ¯ ^ - : ; _•

t o a u : ! . : - : . . . -– . . . . - t - h ; i.... Û U - i l ¿ r . _ : _ - / « - ^ - -

p r ' o ^ i - · i w ¿ v . _ y . . . . . . . ^ . ^ ¯. 1 > . . . £ r « - ï . w i . · . , Z t ; ; ^ .

¾AKYt

T.·.c i¯.uC4;v¿n·; -Tt«t·-:· J . . ^ 1 . , r „ v i á c t;.c Ir— ¿ t e s ti¯.c ;Û.:.U ¿ C C C I « /. - L . i « r / :.£·-c.¯_¿l^ u r . - / . . J C : ¢ J S t o ccu:¯: ; e & o u : : c s as; Il·T¿1. . .

:¿ jc:J:r·»· « z ¿ - ^ ut tr.e .IZJ~ ci cz¡:iic*mÆtit.

TI-i _`er*c>x:i··j »t·-1-^

>'5 *-» š"~ —`*`= - ` ; r .-.'ov . . . ; . . . Ú_C2JC LC i·'.jw»i . ; ¿ ; . : . · I

oy I ; w ^ t u ; v»i.,ci. c · : z s ; -u- ; * ; v . . ¿a :...wu··.,ì. t¿-e ? . ¢ c w : / . - j

i¿w i ; n i t . ' y . 71.e ? . ¿ c c . v i : . j S i d . c ¿.-¿,:Û__ tw ¿ , u v i . e t..c ?

r · j ç c r t t ; / , Ccc>-:*c J C . _ ¿ L , UJ a , ¿ ¿ t cf . »¿ ' Ì X Ì S - I I . ^ ¯.¿t. l ¿

A«HM>TIMTKM( ONKXN-MATOWL MAMAOBMTT ASMM>TIUTIOK CANARY-CONTMCTOC

/ õó·miHuno« »Mirr

ƒ¯l

o

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA TMiiuno*r·i

MATERIEL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
Ptç» «*> < * l <

?? N.S. CONTRACT NO.

3 9-.\A-::::

COffTRACTOR¾ NAME AND A D O # « S

AMENDMENT NO. SPECIFICATIONS OFTHE SERVICES

r¾ATED

T;*t r.cceívia« State J,T<2Û3 to ,;¿cv:«,e ¿rojiaj.e fcr tl;e Ir^-i^¿_; The ou-ccit--r.àl proçrûi-^, SÍJÄÜ IÍ·CÌUC« «-t is not l i n i t e ú to A_u_:. ûauic ücucaccr, (A3£) a.¯ì<.1. General £.juív¢.icncy Diploc¿i {CET5) cr ¿Lr.LlâZ - i r . i :ci:colfe^¯uivw»¿^.cycr l i t e r a c y p:og\¯ûi:::, The Zcvilc Cou>;cy :.tc;.::cir. C¿r.ter'J c:,e:ct:iriL ..¿nu&l cr.titled "O^er*tiaL,
r·-r J A . . - 1 (Atuac.-..cr.c 3) Ì3 ¿;'.pressly íncor^orat·d herein C u ..arto¿ trii3 c
T.UÌ :.ecc:v.r.¿ State -ha*I prcviûc a i l availcjile vocational r.*;:>., ..o>:-. tr¿ini.¯i¿,·, d n ; coun>;elliia AXK. dr¯uj awa.*·n«ifi ra.*sa û- ^valif¿ed In:^i

E. RSCR"ATIOMi
Thû ."ace-Viaç St¿to shall provide rsr th· use of the I voi¿r.t l i í t i n ; ana otí.cx avâii¿J:le roc¿eationa.1 •Quipuienc. 1c c.ic ¿ver-t ti^»t t^c· P.oceivir.g 2tatci ioc·j aot •»ave an e t h l e t i c f i e l i , ti¯.cReceivic^ 3i._t.2 ahall prov¿.-i« a= a t h l e t i c fiold suitable for t·.e u. jf tec I;i_utcí:.

¯T*C-¯ r ¯ ¯
1. 7.<-· .¯.e.co:·.·_;.¡j 5t»ut; - h u l l . . : u v i i è •Ii-..atCi; wucì
¡ . : ( . L ` . . . v i : i í ( *:::". u e i · t c . _ L . ¿¿.c.;.-t;.\ t i ¯ i é c c t ä - : y t c ü ð f e ; ` . £ : ^ l ; e a i t h d:._ ¿. I¯L. t · » c t·s_ ¿ u w c . .¯.:`. t - i - c ¿ ; · . » , , i . ' t * ü j r ¿ . _ ; - - c £ » · . c CO.¯.Ì;. «.r. l t y _ _ < .
j . ' . : . , t i . ¿ . . >¯.. , , o r . : ' . w . , t^.«¿ r.cCi». i v i n . j £ t ú t c J . ^ i i " . z ¿ i ^ t » c .
*·" ¯ a F·¯' . u l . . . . . ' . . , . r. t . r . i . - j · , b e ¿ c r . : .u¿`¿.¿ . .r.~

w;*¿ttw:- - u w.-·: _¯. i . .r. «_ —v£_r.i_ ¿. t o i I Ù C C · ^ w i t h t - c

? r i w . auL.·^. .v, . lr. every c«:.e tl.c r.cc»<ivi:..

¿uil.- aot.*j¯

^w.:. >:.j î t c t c ...^ec' i ¿ c e l / le¿a¿¯ul*.· ^ c .

VHTTI-KATEmn. MAMAOKMIKT A«MMCTIUnO« OMIM-ttAT«Mn.

W W AJ—TIUTÌO« CAKAHT-COWTMCTO·

on Aon·or ^ooLø«iiao»-oe>Aim·cirr or

' I
OO*rTWUAT)Ot( • M O T

GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
THl N«TIO·rt CA*TTAi.

MATERIEL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

p^, >fa

5

o( 1 4

HA. CONTRACT im 929S-\h-Ï.Z

AMENDMENT NO.

n*TED

COWTÏUCTO*¾ N A M i AMÐ ADCME8S

SP€CIF>CATK>NS OF THE SERVICES

2, `.',\Qi. the Receiving rt«to recover tc« Innate* frou the ir.át itut-or. because •zi c¯.ca»cai, ¿¯j>c.latric , or ¿antai care o : ::cdt:,c·r.;, the Scnoir.-j Ttate • h u i . ;¿ve tc the Receivir.c State û¿va^c^- autho:.ty as r¿-ove the In.T-ates. Ir. the ev·r.t s^f ax. c.¯..o:i,c:xj whicl: do«:j E... c. ,er::it ûdvAr.c·d Authority, th« i n s t i t u t i c r ui·-ill .¯.ouify t:u; Sfe.iuir.c Ct¿ue o£ the reoov*l &s promptly thereaft¿ a¿ i ; : ¿ c t i c à j i o , T¡.e Receiving òtata e . ^ I l take a l l necessary piecaut ;or.a to aái.ur¯3 the oaf ckcei: -nç cf the Innate ¼hile the Ir.ua: ic i^bér¡t ¿-·r. tr.e r.crr-¿.1 ,;Ì¿L·U cf ccr.finfc.-r.cnt. The Receiving Sta:
i l ¯r¯j/___` r.cc.ìouary c u ¿ t o - i û . au:o:vi

i,- 3tat« shâij. ;:roviae to t h · Inmatss a l l a·c*8t¿r> c a l , >h¿r~_«ccuticai, ;syc¡`.i¿tric, and d«xtdl oervlc«s. Tbe :v.ß¢ Scat* shall ^er£or.~ cr.c3« ss*rvic·« thxouc¿ staff
or contract ae¿icêl personnel nonrally providing c*re ar e e:t.3Cinrj ;jc£.ulit-or. at the f a c i l i t y . Th· R · c · i v l r
l ,-e:·fo::.. t L · ; j i.dr»·ict.. ;.i a r · y u l a r l y BtdictAiA·d f a c i l i t y cpc;ucoû or t t : l . : e - by the prison f a c i l i t y , or contract £õci^^ty ¦»MCii as a doctor's c-r c e r . t i i t ' s o f f i c e AS part of the ..¿_it.. v,r co:>¿c‰ii-¿-¿l ,.'ó¾róa cf the Receiving State, in co¿plianc wit., s-oi-i-â.^- w-usc.¿L¿à ;y the American Correctional Association (!`o.-iï£l :·:·ÓI:ÓI S e r v i c e s ) . If Ir.-~a.tes require radical services in ¿>_ i t i ^ ^ tw tl.e :!or::<ài Medical S L I v i c e s , tl»e Receiving State • h i l l ; : : v t . L t_ ¯. ,c- :.¯::¿Cu- oviJi-.-:.dl ¯Ædical •ei¯vices (AHS) on a c : ¿ : .¯c...i.a:;¿¯w-..: _Õ.-.ÌJ, ..I_C co .:;c«.c¿ SICC,OGO -urir.¿ the durûtior. d

•TCCD ;

, ......`.«._

-j C t c - c t·.^.11 c.»-u-¯c t . w i t a l l Ini¯Àtðs : : a l i v i r . · , u;j¿cr ;.cal-i.y, .\j:t¿i¯^ ( , O : . - . C Ì C : ir. ¿cccrc¿nce with ¿ l i Cc--es ^r.

BrT AB·m«TIUTIOtt ONOM-MATV«C KAMAOBMtm AO«M«nUTIOtl CA«A«T-COWT»ACTO· OH AOCMCT <KXDO*IIO£^-Oe»AJm·«irT OF PJLt.

DC » M · *m· '>«^
* co«rr»iuATto« i x m

\_¿. _ _

Ik

^ GOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBU

TMI NATWirS CA*TAl

MATERIEL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

5

14

P^» Me

*

9299-AA-HS
N.3. CONTRACT NO.

AMENDMENT NO

CONTRACTOR ¯S NAME AND ADOAES«

SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SERVICES
RIGHT 07 INSPECTION

l·lATED

¯.::e r^adr.; £ t õ t e i»hall h¿ve t.¯.c ri¿`ht to i n s p e c t , at a i l reasonable .....e.., di.j in„t i t u t Ì·JU of tii« r e c e i v i n g S t a t e in vhicL I a a a t e s are -..;•.-i.r.íiw _£. c r - c . to i é t e ; = i a e if that i n s t i t u t i o n ;naintains ataoûardG -<---; an- J i s c i p l í n a co;npatible with thoac of t h · S·Ddiß¢ S t a t e an¿ ih¿
1 I ¿ 5 the-:cir. are treated e q u i t a b l y , r e g a r d l e » · o£ race, r e i i » . w or f i t t i c n * l o r i g i n .

`T-r`T •?

V\Cñ`.'CZZ~

`ecte.v.ng Ctat·j hereby undertakes to c¯«ake a v a i l a b l o tc ch· Sending «uc.¯i p l a c e s for Incat·8 a» c«y be vac&nt {roc ti.tfi to t i » · la a t · d i n s t i t u t i o n o o¿ the Receiving State cade a v a i l a b l e for such
confiri·œent by zt.c iawe of the .Receiving S t a t e .

ARTICLE IV. APPLICATION
71.e Se-Uìnÿ 3 t a t e w i l l aub.¯nic i. keparate a p p l i c a t i o n t o the receiving 3 t i t ¿ f c r tì¿.c. individual Inc-ate propo¢eô ¿or cenfiaex»er.t.
r^¿w : r : . ' a c ¿ : i o n sr-all c o n c i s t of the following! Pull inforn\at¿on anc ¿: .'WCLJ.¿.·J· U Ü C „ . « C : * rciatir.a t s t.u.e I;¯.·nate, i n d u c i n g ca¿e -¯.ijtoryi , " Ì J - C ¿ . —~<¿. ¿ i i n i c - 1 f e c o i i a j j u d i c i a l and adr`.iaiütrativü rulings and . !^r¿ :-.·.st .r.kJ cr p e r t i n e n t tc t.ie I c : ¿ t e ; t.':e oenteuce pursuant to ....ic.¯. c¿.¯íir.c.¯-t!nt i3 Cv oe i»«- or to continue; reaaoiis for tho reque*t^. :;¿r..íi;r) ânu i»»cj:tif i c ¿ t ion data iuc.`. a¿ r>hútoyraµhii &nJ f i.;B·erprínta. ^.. c. ;c:¿»¯¡¿ rt¿tt- - . l i l l ;¡ot *.r&^¿fcr i.¯i In ±te to the- r._·c¿. v.n>; State ...i... t..c .¯.¿ci:iv;r.„ Ct¿tc d,prc>ve^ t·.» a^;:•I :c¿t ¿or..

`.¯,w.. rocäíptMÄ tàfe approve- cf ti.c· ¿ ý , l i c a t i o n i¯urEu¿r.t to A r t i c l e IV, :..c r . ^ d i r c S¾»¾e# a t i t s ex¿er.Ji, w i l l i e i i v o ¿ tuc Ir,r.·at* to t¿e -.¿_·_ . t u t i i i - ùesigr.-ts·J b>· ti.e Recaivin«j £ t ã c e . At the 9¿.r* ti.T« tl¯ic • ¿: _.i-j ¯ ; _ i - •li:l¿v-.r: t:¿Ä I^tAto, £2«J C»-·nding S t a t e ôhail J e l i v c r tc t . r.·,.ce.v*r.j rtj¿ü t.-·- fcilwwin¾ i¿coiJ* cf tr.c i ; j - j t e i thi: or¿·¿.n*I cr ^ ->..• ¿ut.·;cr.Llca:t·c. c=l·V ^r tl.o cou-r i i s s r . t i ûr.y other o f f i c i a l ¿?·pcrj J . .. c _..._.. c- i ' . : î r : i » i ; » -c:2r.;i3i;,· c¿^c f i l e ¿ ¿ t e z i a l * j ¿uu, ..«d-icùl . . . i v i . . . '.M.L·:.:V: . :.`x;c` 1. to ¿t ..ucual fexcnan^e of In_¯«atec bstw«ei» t. o . , - c . « ^ tc :.¯-ii tw.;i.-¿c:, thd ù u i r x r . : : : : cf one of the c t e t e ¿ ray act c. - . . <-„ur.c wi L:.W : . · . J I s t a t e for ^...e r u r ; ; - c a of trar,sftrr.r.;; it*. ! « * : ( . . -^ :.¯^c ti¿w c<><_:*.-i- to c o t i « t a t c s :¿y we r.¿niz:iï
«mrn-HATIMD. MAMAOOÜKT AUWIMIMT>O« OMOM—*unniB. mMAaitifT * H M n M n o K cAMAirr—OOWTMCTO·
on AoiNer accDtwiio»~De»AOTMewT o* PMJL

• • • •o ox m»·m (•to. ii««
/ co*rrwuAno« •HCTT

X_i

fj.

^^

QOVERNMEKT OF THE DISTRICT Of COLUMBU

MATERIEL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
PH

N.S CONTRACT NO ??¦
CONT»UCTO«·S NAME AND AÐOfCSe

AMENDMENT NO

SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SERVICES

AA?ICLF VI. TRAliSrzr. CF PUIPS

flATED

T.-c rcecfeiving S t a t e BL»II c r e d i t to the Account of the Instate i l l íu.¯ál: •_-•.: t h · I.icAte e i t h e r froc the Receiving State or the Sending S t a t e . V..wj·. return of thô In.v*te to the Sending £ t a t a , tiie Receiving State sh« i:·:r.s£fer to the Senci¿·ç State fun¿s in this account c í the Inmate at the t—re o£ r e t u r n .

VII. LAWS MO ?.2GULATIOì;S
W;i.ie ix3 the custody o£ tne Receivis‰ Staue« I n o a t e s s h a l l be s u b j e c t tc j,.`. the provifcíone of law and r e g u l a t i o n s a^^>iCAble to persona coe*aittc-c íor v i o l a t i n g the law of tL·» Receiving S t a t e so long a i such provt*ions o£ law and l e g u l a t i o n j are not i n c o n e i » t a c t w¿th the Inmate's s e n t e n c e .

ARTICLE V I I I . ^SCQRDS AND ?JPORTS FROî: R£CZIVING STATT
A. V i t h : n ninety (90) days f c l l o v i n g the r e c e i p t cf &n I n c i t e , :'...` Receiving S t a t e s h a l l -¯u-ni*jh &n a d i i a o i o n 8uat-»ry and clafiei¿icatic·n study report outlining tho Innate'» s o c i a l b¿ci;grcuna, c:odic*l, p s y c h i a t r i c , ecucation« and v o c a t i o n a l fi.¯:u:r... ace i n c i c a t i r . g the i n - t i c u t : ^ u i ; : ; · ; : · Ì : w^.ich the Receiving ' u i c reco.T1r..e:.ds. T;¯**.¯cõf t e i , p¿·troj¿-ly at i n t e r v a l s o£ s i x (5) ¿.¿onth£, JUV at lâã.Bt ûr.nuðii`/, L..e Âc:<-.v:ng 3 t a t ¿ s h ¿ i l furnish L.¯¯.C .'end..-.. S t a t e a report ¿-vinv· ¿ ¿u.*iíi¿ry oî c.^ I .-vr¿ 11 ' :J proç;re3fc and àJjUJti.¯.B.¯.t s i n c e the I Û Ù : r e p o r t . The h e c e i v i z . ; Stat¿ s h a l l :cr¯w¿.¯. a l l *ucn repcrtc tc t..¿ rending r t ¿ t e .
t i - c i »c :.caû cí ¿s l a s t i t u t i c n , in wí-.r:. I r_¯..d..;.; c._ îceeµ a l l r.ccí.ZLL·i/ znü r'·"'·-·'ecï l e c c : . c r ~:.v . . : : : : . . viÐ u i`¿nr.Ci i j i i e . .;ctwccr> the 2c:ncir.ç L'^.¿t. -r..
During the Ii:r/itc'c conxir.cr«nt in tí.c· £ · n c i 2 ^ £ u c c _ : ^ l l =-e «t£t«tled to r%.·c-iv£. ; : , t up-cn rexji<BC s h e l l be íumiLnc^ »i;..¿, c c ç i c ^ of ucy :u·.¯. . • S C Ì Ì . C.¯ Tha Xeccivinj £Cä,ti r.v/ kc¿·,. cjpiw.¯. c í a n / _,..c.. : ê c ¿ : - ^ . ;or< an; c f t a r t c r i i.¯.a->.vC wf an I:i.*¿ts'· cent ir.j.· - : ; t .

·nom a«H-aATTB·c. • u i i i u u — r * m i w m u n o » C*MA*T-CO»ÍT»ACTO·
on AOBMCT OOCDCMMOO—o»Aimte»rT or

¾ DC » » • Økm M*T) *

V
GOVERNMENT OF THE OtSTFUCT OF COLUMBIA
THf MATKW· CAOTAl
MATERIEL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION

N.&. CONTRACT NO. Î29S -AA-H5
CONTKACTOfl¾ NAME ANO ACKMCS8

AMENDMENT NO.

QATED

SPECIFICATIONS O f THE SERVICES

i.x. REMOVAL FROK INSTITUTION

The Receiving S t a t s ir-all not re~jve ar. I r . a : e iron the i n s t i t u t i o n ¼hic: t.j·¿ Ic¿¿¿te is ccniiufeu withcut Õ.¯ crdoí í-rcc. tac Sondinç S t J t e . This p-rchibit ion «hall aot AZ>¿>ly to l u t i - a - i n s t i t u t i o n a l t r a n s f e r - ¿,urauant tc A r t i c l e XI or an e.¯je:¿tìrxy - e c e - ü i t * t i n ç tho ir<c·diat· removal of the
for D € d i c · l , d e n t i l , or ;^e>·cr.í*tric c : u c a · n t , or t o A ranovel SL·iy L·y f i r e , flood, aa£th<,¯uake or o t h · r cata*tro^n· or
conditicn¿ pre»u·utin¢ i.-j¤incnt J<inger to tl.e s a f e t y of the Iru¿at·. in tne case cf any rezovdi for sucr. ericzç«;r*cy cau¿o, the Ruceiviaç State ÜÌ^.11 in£or£ tae Cenái&w State cf the wherc·aJDOuta of toe I n c i t e at the e a r l i e s t p r a c t i c a b l e tinw and s n a i l e x e r c i s e a l l reasonable care for the
in»¯ and custody uf tuch

ARTICLE X. HEARi:iCS
The keceivinç State s h a l l provide ece^u«te f a c i l i t i . e e for any h·ariag by d u t h o r i t i â - of the- S«ndi&g £t&t6, to which an I t ø å t · nay be e n t i t l e d by the lawn of t^e Seaòic\; S t a t e . Upon tl.¿ ÌÖ;UCÍ,Í of the Sending S t a t e , t h j a u t h o r i t i e s of the Receiving St¿te -1-all conduct any ¿uch Tr.ó Receiving State s h a l l prepax¿ and sur-i_it tne record of any together with any recossä*ndatioL·<: of the hearing o f f i c i a l c , to the
Stûtc.

` •TIT r``T •;• V T

» •«"`^ » _ " •}'^^·>«

7ÏM F . t ` c e i v i a s S t a t e : ¿ y t r a n s f e r ar. Iu.r.ate ír^^· t¡r.fi i n a t i t u t i o n u c - c r : t .

c c n t r c l t c v-x·L;t^e¿ ....t,:.¿vcr i t c-;«.^._ »u-·'¯ 3 c ; i : ; . J , . ; - C , ; : C U ; ' ^ o v i - c ^ , i , t.»t· ¯ « * c · ¿ v ^ : ¿ C t a t e . . v - i - i r.:t . ¿ - J V _ · - i . I c j « i · i . e ' - : - 3 : o ¿ / : : - > . .

^ · i t t e a ¢ o ; . . e : , : • . : ¯w.:·. Z:

. . r u : - t _ . T :.¿ ?.ccc·iv.¯..

I_ ca_:c a¿:„- I n n a t e e¿ca^e_ f :¿i. c'.·3 C ` J Í : . · - ; rc¯ c.-t r;occiv `.r.¿ Z t a t e , t¡.¿ >l reurc.i¿w.c ; t à ; : 3 - c r * c a ^ t u r e tne In:^att¿. i u - i c i i d t o i y r e ^ c i - t c ti»e S c r - i i n j f t ¿ t c the
» - c ¿ ^ # . ?i.e ¯.i¡ce.v:r., £ t - t ¿ ü·¯-iil r-av.ï Ì.¯.VÎ .-.'•í.i.iry : c s ; j c r . j - ¿ ¿ i i t y íw. iUv- - J t ¡ Ä - . t j t o 'TlVcct -::e r u r ¿ u i u uí— : t : ; . ; . , ; , w¿¯ Ir—Xit·ì-. w i t h i n i t wVv. t â ü .t·w.. y« t%Tìy co«>c in ccrj¯.ccL.¿i. _,.-rc:».·i... à.i¿¿i •_>£ c^íir,e¿-j-¿ t c ¿>¿~c jcx¯ufc ^,·¯ w.¯.«t r.cce«viCv, £ C S L 6 I In t.^c r - u t c·» ÒS`. esc&¿xì to ¿ ; u : i s c i c t . v . · ; C¿.ÎCI t:;a»¯ cr.c 3Ü:Ì·-.¿.; CLJC. ^r ú.¯.e ? . a c e i v . c ; £ i á c c , ch'_
; t : . i t ^ l l i n e t i m t ^ e x t z i - l * t i w . . .`r .^c-r-Jitioc p.¿-cec-úir.3-.
WfVrt-M*TIMC. M I M " ¶ t ^ " ^ AOMMmUTIOM OMBt·MATIIML K<iU.<l—IfT A1IIMM1IUT10W CANARY-CO«TftACTO·
i—Mmummrr on AOD·CT OOLOBIMOO—œ»M 1 VIM I or PMX.

•Mirr

QOVERNMEKT OF THE DISTRiCT OF COLUMBIA
TM· HA·nO*n CA*TTAt
MATEfílEL MANAGEMENT AOMINISTRAJION
l¿

N.S CONTRACT NO. ?f ?9-^\-:-·r
CONTRACTOR'S NAME ANO ADOffESS
:cLr /::rv. e?j:z?. cr

AMENDMENT NO SPECIFICATIONS OF THE SERVICES

DATED

..u '.`.·_·.iw J Î :-¯

bo z«i;civ_J «y

: provisions offcb«ccatract, the n¿ ^recoceLC· in tje £ollowinç

A. Articiey I throus*. XXV of ;Ì«ÌS contract.

3. £rtâ.¯c¿rG Co:.tr_ii‰ ?rGv;a.ür.i ~-jr Ja* With D i s t r i c t o£ Coluisbie

Gcvcrn;j6^t: Su.-t..¿/ ¿;.(: Sui-vicet Cwntraccs, 3eceBfc·r, 1984, A¢ -'·—

a-;íir.idci. (Atu:;i.·cr.t 1 )

- ¯^^

A - i l l ¿.¯. t,.è Council cí the DiBtric6 a£ •C6luaí>ia to «n«ç.t cLe C . s t r i c t cf Columni* to •near th% '-
Inters£û.tc Correctior»tí Ccr^act. (Att*cnr>·nt 2)) .

D. C¡.`oraci-â Manual For J¾i;3. (Attûci«e·nc 3)

T : C L - · •-<V. TOT.M, .•.`^·=;I:L::::::T
:r. n.otrui^:::t. ¿ u > o C . ^ the whclt -:Ú;. . j « , tc:7¯¿, :ona.::oLL¯, or
-w¿.·., ¿nd ur.i,_ : : : . : . ä c : wíuìll su;.

•ee;.`.ene c£ the p a ¿ t i e s . Th·r· are 'cation* o t h · r th*a thoa· conc-ai=u v·- wll previous co.T.Tuaic*tions,
•-••- '¯ e l J* writtca, oetwcen the

«·CC£PILL1, Åãk¿ïL TO AXD AfF&OVEI>:
A ^r

LAVALA COl¾TÏ SHER1ÏF

J ü £ LUIS LIWÀ, CÜÜKTT

^/ , - / / - ; ,v'

'' `

, ". yJ/f-·^·

f X F R E Ä « T A T I V 2 FOR D . S . I .

«rWTt-HATEMCL MAMAOtMOTt

>·

·r-· 2

TIOW ORCtM-IUTIWtL

IUnOM

o·t AOCMCT OOL MOO—o » A j r m f M T o r P

CAMAJtT-OO·mUCTO«

^,>^r———
m '
CO·mMUATIOK • M « T

í-¿

K^J

QOVERNMENT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
TMI MA`nOMt CAKTAO.
MATERIEL MANAGEMENT ADMINISTRATION
P^t »

1 3 <jt 1 4 M9m

N.8. CONTRACT Mft 3 2 S 3 - A A - H 5

AMENDMENT NO

BATED

CONTRACTOR'S NAME AND AOOWE88

SPECIFICATIONS OP THE SERVICES

?. At ¿j:y tir.«j before f i s ¿ l i,a/...tr.; ar.d c¿re« (3) years t f * . c ¿ f t c r , the Ct-^tract in z Officer -_¿y h¿ve the R e c e i v e ; 3t-ate'e ir.Vwicei; cr vcwcr.c:s a-,¯:^ jtd:ä:..cr.t¿· of co¿C a u d i t e d . ?r»£ Sending £t-ce r.âj ; Ä J ¿ C dcy µa,;:.ent i:^ i:¿i::;t3 ¿tCû.z.i.-ed =y t.¯<; Cor-tr¿ctin,, Off*ce.' to c n s t ; i . u u::¿llou£-_ i c ,.ãyr:^r-!:J.

AJ.TICLI ::Y.Z. cç·Tr.>r? \D:·i::rTy.TrT^· -

,

A.. Ccr.*. ..:.w.c··; Cfficer - T.\w Curtiact-n: O f f i c e r i s th«^^o^lìr**" Se_;-i.¯*ü ^c¿ce vî¿iicidl c : c . x . : : , . . : , Cw.<iractu¿U/ ¿¾¿Bd^*2·Díat:::c t

Per Day Pei Inua;o

Location

N'o. oí lan¡ato·s

Plra ?lxe<¿ Unit Price

Zivaia Co. Detention 226 (Not Ü= *xcee<i)

$46.50

Ctr.

T^uuun>i^-yvm

55 (Mot. :¯ ¿*c>ìod)

S3S.OC

ZAÏÀLA COUNT! JAIL

B . Ii the Scadiag State requires the j « r v i c · s of t..c R·c·ivinç

Stat«i for few«r than 226 Innutas pur ¿«y at th« Zavala County

Detection C«st·r &nd 55 Imaates r«·^ <¿Ay *t chc Crystal City J a i l ,

th« S*cdir.g Statt 5hAll raake payrr<ent £cr tfc· *ctuAl sumb·r of

Inuatcs per ^«y bûd·d upon th« fizr. £i.t«i¿ unit pzic· AS shown U C V Î ,

C. TÜ¢ £cr*ùin>j¦ State chôii. pay cr.e Receiving ^tate £«cthly u^on receipt aau accð^tâ.nae by t-«e S*nainç f!tac· oí r·çuiroc «ervice=. T^«¡ R¢rcc:v;i¿¿ State ehall submit uonthiy ¿cvoices to t/.û Contract Àa.nixüttrâtor no ldt«r than ti*4 t¿uth of ti^ tol'low¿ng r,on:h, for c e r t i f i c a t i o n ' ot receipt of c¿tiscactory services prior to authorization of {.Ayraent. Paynent ; . ¿ x . ba oad« by the 2encin:; CCÛI%: - · t/-c Ccu.:ty Tre2burcí, 2¿vala Ccun:y Courtí.cui.tf Cr>.;Ujl
P , . . »-% r . . . . . r 7 ? •; i a

-" ^ . Trxì KeCw-:v.L¿ ¿ t - â t e s i w l l * ; i c i u u e c.'-c Íwi¿ovii4v,· l . - . f ; r u t i ¿ ; . 1..
• ^1 * ^ #^ ' * · * ^ r- a

r. T:¯.e £ezi-ìin3 Ctotfe is not Ofligat©ò to r·ia¿)urE« t·.· Receiving rt5te fcr c o i t s incurred in «xcees of the cost re iabur:; assent c e i l i n . 3;`&_i£ie<i in Article X, it«c P of the Scspe of Wcrk and cr.e Rcvje¿vinj St¿te is not cbiiçateù to continue providing Aî`!S (;r.clu-ins action* under the Tercinaticn clauø·¢ of this contract) or u·-herwise incur cost* in excess of the cone rei¿¿burs«i::jent c«tili::. spocifi«¿ m Article I, itcn F c£ th« Scop· cf Work, until the Conurâctisj Officer r.oti£idc the r.ec«ivinç State, in writing, that (i) th« ¢stl&atød coct ÒAC beer, incr·ae«¿ aaà ( i i ) the cost reir<Lurse&tent ceilin¿ ha3 b«en revised to a specific dollar axaount.
G. >:o notice, cooounication, or repreuentation la any fora £roa any person other than the Contracting Offieer •hall chance the cost rtiabursejaent ceiling. In the absence of the specified notice* the Sending State is not obligated to reimburse ttae Receiving State for any cc*t3 in excess of th« cost reiubursac*nt c e i l i n g , vb·tb«x such cotjta were incurred during the cour¿e of contract performance or ¿e â result cî termination.
`.i. If the ccsuxeiÜBbuisenent ceiling specified in Article I, it¿.¯. F of the Scppt,of Work is increased, any costs the Receiving £t¿¿¿ incurs be£dtt¾`the increase that are i¿ excess of the previous cost. reicourse¤ent ceiling sàall be âllowa£>le to the same extent as xí incurred aftarwerd, unieu3 tiie CcDtracti-v¯ Officer issues 0. L·^c`...iiiati,on or ether notice ¿irect¿r¿ç that the increase i£ ^c^«../ c cover termination or ether specified ex^en^es.
I. A c:«Lu<ye crder 3ha 11 not se Cwcsidered an authorizitíon to ú.vC-ea th.-_ applicable c o j t reiobuisetieat c e i l i n g âKeci£icd in A i : _ - l c I , i t s ; ? K:Í the Sco`re cí #'¯crk, unless t¿id ch&nv,o crûc. -....cc¿iÍCj^^¿¢,JL¾µrta¿,e3 the co;t. : . - : ; J U : ^ C ¢nt c u . I i : . ; .

A. TYPE O~ CO^P.¿CTi
7i.L·ä : - - f i r e fixed unit > i i c ¢ c o n t r a c t with * c o s t reicJsLi-dc:.-cnî. c o . - ^ n e n t .
5. 7Z.^.y OF COf?TRAC7»
The u n . of the c e n t : act t h a l l b · froc February If, 1S89 u*;rcur·h February 15, 1990. The Lett«r Contract d*t«ed P·bra*ry 16, 1S39 ¿o •×ter.aod by m o d i f . c a t i o c Jatec April 14, 1989 i« h«r«toy tr£-^cu with tr.is d e f i u i t i z a d c o c t r a c t .
A.'TirLr :·:VII. x?rou:r:
7^.0 toc&2 Uoiiax a.:.cunt of this contract ¿h«ll not exceed $4,351,485.00. T.¯.i¿ total dollar ¿aourit induces th· f¿rr> fixed unit price component (JO* Article XZ) anc. the cu*t reiu>bur·ei&ent component (see Article I, Ì.-G.¯_ r ) . ?l:c· t c t a l dcli«r artount of tiie firm fixed unit price compoiicnt of cn¿3 contract shall not exceed $4,408,485.00. The ceiîi:*g for the cczt rei/u2ux¯3ci:·er^t ¿opponent sh-ill net exceed $150,000.00.

A ?.T I CL·E Till.

R£?>. £ I: ¡C OF I >fríATE S

Tl.¿ d e c e i v i n g 5t£,te > i a d e l i v e r Ir-T¿iccs to Che Sending £Late upcn ~r-Cten de;.w^nJ. by C.:J fenùiny £ t a t a Mile to the R e c e i v i n g S t a t e .

7.¯.<.· Sending S t a t e w i l l retake any I n r â t e , upon t h e r e ç u e · t of the
Rac¿xvin¿ S t - c e , wit.`in f o r t y - f i v e (45) d*ys a £ t · r r · c · i p t of the request
to r·tâke.

Iž <-`- In:.¯¿te'â cuiai:j¯cnt i ¿ t c m i n e c e c for any rMSOD, the Seeding S t a t e w¡-Áii accede d e i ^ v c x / or cLe Icr.¿tc ¿c the R e c e i v i n g S t a t e , and a t the S^ici¿ÿ State-'y e×pcr.¿e return tl»« Inar»àie t o the S«ading S t a t e . Rovever, xf An l ü ¿ t t ' s c o m c i t z a n t i s t e r a i a a t e u for any rea»oo and tne Send lag £ t a t e . the R e c o í v í n ¢ S t a t e and the I n c i t e agree l a w r i t i n g , the- X n M t · ^cây be r e l c a · í e ô w i t h i n the Receiving S c a t e .

ARTICLE :·.IV. PHOTOCKA?HI>fG A,*P RgLEASL Z? :iIPOILHATIOK
T2.e r.cce.v.r.^ £ t ¿ t e cLall not r e l « ò - e to the p u b l i c any information, rscurUc c wtl.e.~ ô a t a c;DCO.¯nicv 7nr¿cv£. The R e c e i v i n g S t a t e s h a l l not i¢ri*ASë ¿c t.;e ¿;oblic personal h i s t o z i & ¿ or photographs of I n a a t e · or .c;or.T¿ti¿i coi:cornínv Innate'• delivery, re¿iovai, iütra-institutional :.ar._rc¿, ccr.ñkL¡.~ cz r e i é j - c , Tlo. R«c¯*vir.y S t a t e s h a l l r.ot ^errait : oi.c.'C»>.; or ^iioto^·ia4. Ì¯»«ŽXS to i n t e r v i e w jr photovraph Inmates without tLe ex^re.w^ w r i i i c r . ^ U . . ¯ : : Ï Ì O . ¯ . ãn¿ upon the request of the I n c i t e . The Ât`ce;·..¿'k "t¿re sr«¿li rc£-_`i to t i « r»i.¯.¿;-; Ccate raqueats for ¿ n f o r : * t i c r . . c.j<--^-.r-v Zru-ctw;,. However, the R c c c i v . ; ^ S t a t e cay r e l e a s e to the poL^c i n ¿ c r r ¿ t i o n ccr.tair.cd in µ`ubiic records, such as 3ent¿uce date or

 
 08/04/03 12:53 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

Green v. District of Columbia

PC-DC-0014-0002
ARNOLD & PORTER
555 Twelfth Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1206

@]OOl

Fax Transmittal

August 4, 2003

RECIPIENT NAWIE(S)

RECIPIENT FAX NUMBER(S)

RECIPIENT

RECIPIENT

TELEPHONE NUMBER(S) ROOM#(S)

Amanda Matee

617-496-4863

617-384-9263

SENDER

SENDER'S TELEPHONE NUMBER

SENDER'S ROOM NUMBER

Marsha Tucker

202-942-5315

1252M

CLIENT/MATTER NUMBER TIMEKEEPER NUMBER

NUMBER OF PAQE(S)

50080.003

7207

We are transmitting cover sheet)

Pa9e(s) (including this

TRANSMISSION DEADLINE (DATE & TIME) ALTERNATE TELEPHONE NUMBER (OPTIONAL)

This document must be transmitted no later than:

Alternate telephone number at which the sender can be reached if there are difficulties with this fax:

If you experience difficulty receiving this fax transmission, please contact the operator at 202.942.5837.
MESSAGE
Amanda, As we discussed, 1 am faxing a copy of the index of the formal papers for Green v. District of Columbia.

PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL
Information intended only for the use of the addressee named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, please note that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. Anyone who receives this communication in error should notify us immediately by telephone and return the original message to us at the above address via the U.S. Mail.

08/04/03 12:53 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

¾OO2

AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION Transferred Prisoners' Rights
FORMAL PAPERS

1.

4/17/89

2.

10/2/89

3-

10/20/89

4.

10/24/89

5.

10/24/S9

6.

11/7/89

7.

11/7/89

8.

11/29/89

12/4/89

Motion to Dismiss the Complaint of Bruce L. Mention or, in the Alternative, for Surmnary Judgment; Memorandum of Points and Authorities; Statement of Material Facts
Informal Status Call on the Organization of the Texas Cases (Mention, et al, v. Barry, et aU
Defendants' Motion for Stay and Memo of Pointsand Authorities in Support Thereof (Crafton v. Thom¾urgh, etal.1
Notice of Appearance of Murray R. Garnick and Helene B. Madonic as counsel for aniici curiae (Mention v. Barry)
Suggestion of Amici Curiae Regarding Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases (Mention v. Barry)
Notice of Appearance of Daniel J. Standish as counsel (Mention v. Barry)
Proposal of the Attorney General of the United States Regarding Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases and Response to the Suggestion of Amici Curiae (Mention v. Barry)
Letter from Helene Madonick to Honorable Thomas Hogan enclosing a copy of her response to a letter she received from Mr. Wahid Stamps-Bey
Notice of Appearance of Daniel J. Standish as counsel for defendant Richard Thornburgh (Williams v.

garnimu/permanent/garnickl4s

08/04/03 12:54 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

@IOO3

10.

12/4/89

11. 12/19/89

12.

12/19/89

13.

12/19/89

14.

12/20/89

15.

12/27/90

16.

12/27/90

17.

1/5/90

18. 2/2 8/90

19. 3/8/90

20.

3/9/90

Thornburgh)
Defendants' Motion For Stay and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (Williams v. Thornburgli)
District of Columbia's Response to Amici Curiae Suggestion Regarding the Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases.
Defendant's Motion for Stay and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (Langley v. Thorriburglf)
Defendant's Motion for Stay and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof (Daniels v. Thornburgli)
Order that Daniels v. Thomburgh. et al. be subj ect to the proposed stay filed in Crafton v, Thomburgh. et al.
Reply of Amici Curiae Regarding Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases (Mention v. Barry)
Plaintiffs Comments in Response to the Suggestion of Amici Curiae Regarding Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases (Mention v. Barry')
Response of the Attorney General to the Reply of Amici Curiae Regarding Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases
Motion for Stay and Memorandum of Points and
Authorities in Support Thereof
Praecipe
Motion for Stay and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof

garnimu/permanent/garnickl4s

08/04/03 12:54 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

@]OO4

21. 4/5/90 22. 4/5/90 23. 4/25/90
24. 4/26/90 25. 4/27/90 26. 5/1/90 27. 5/14/90
28. 5/15/90 29. 5/22/90 30. 5/29/90
31. 5/31/90 32. 6/1/90

Notice of Designation of Related Civil Cases Pending in This or in any Other United States Court
Class Action Complaint for Declaratory Judgement and L·ijunctive Relief, Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification and related papers
Defendants District of Columbia and Walter B. Ridley's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer the Complaint, and to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification
Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Supporting Documentation and Order
Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time
Order
letter from Wilbur Cook, Joseph Wright, D. Nelson, Louis Sawyer to Hon. Thomas Hogan accompanied by a cover letter from Judge Hogan's clerk stating that the Judge does not accept personal letters
The Attorney General's Second Proposal for Proceeding in the Texas Prisoner Case
Supplemental Response of Amici Curiae Regarding Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases
Defendants District of Columbia and Walter B. Ridley's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer the Complaint, and to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification
Praecipe
Motion for a Scheduling Conference and for Entry of a Scheduling Order

garnimu/permanen.t/garnicki4s

0 8 / 0 4 / 0 3 12:54 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

¾OO5

33. 6/1/90
34. 6/4/90 35. 6/5/90
36. 6/6/90 37. 6/7/90 38. 6/12/90 39. 6/15/90 40. 6/15/90
41. 6/26/90 42. 6/27/90
43. 7/3/90 44. 7/5/90

Plaintiffs' Request for an Enlargement of Time to Respond to Derwin B. Straite's Motion to Clarify or Redefine the Proposed Class
letter to Stephen To¯wnsend from Jack Sabatino re: the state has no obligation to submit by 4:00
Defendants District of Columbia and Walter B. Ridley's Motion for Enlargement of Time to Answer the complaint, and to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for Class Certification
Answer to the Complaint
Motion for Enlargement of Time
Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification
Plaintj ffs' Motion to Compel Discovery and for Payment of Expenses
Response to the Attorney General to Motion to Clarify or redefine the Proposed Class or to Consolidate the Proposed Class with Straite v. Thomburgh, et al., C.A. No. 89-1204 TFH
Order
Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for A scheduling Conference and for Entry of a Scheduling Order
Order
Defendants Motion for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery and for Expenses

garniinu/permanent/garnickl4s

08/04/03 12:54 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

®OO6

45.

7/5/90

46.

7/5/90

47,

7/5/90

48. 7/9/90 49. 7/9/90 50. 7/11/90

51.

7/12/90

52.

7/13/90

53.

7/17/90

54.

7/10/90

55.

7/27/90

Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion for a Scheduling Conference and for Entry of a Scheduling Order
Opposition of Defendants District of Columbia and Walter B. Ridley to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Scheduling Conference and for Entry of a Scheduling Order
Defendants' Motion for Englargement of time to REspond to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and to Plaintiffs' First Set of Document REquests, or to File a Motion for a Protective Order
Order
Order
Defendants' Motion for a Protective Order Staying Discovery
Opposition of Defendants District of Columbia and Walter B. Ridley to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery
Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motion for a scheduling Conference and for Entry of a Scheduling Order
Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Motion for Protective Order Staying Discovery, Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery, and Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' First Set of Interrogatories and to Plaintiffs' First Set of Document Requests
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs Motion to Compel Discovery and for Expenses
Memorandum Opinion and Order

garnimu/permanent/garnickl4s

08/04/03 12:54 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

¾IOO7

56. 8/1/90

Plaintiffs Supplemental Comments in Response to the Suggestion of AMici Curiae Regarding Organization of the Texas Prisoner Cases

57.

7/30/90

Motion for Intervention by Right to the Class Action of D.C. Prisoners Filed 4/5/90

58.

8/14/90

(Pro Se) Motion for Intervention of Right

* see #65 for next entry

59. 8/20/90

Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(d)(2) Requiring Defendants to Post Notice of Certification; Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motin for Entry of Order Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(d)(2) Requiring Defendants to Post Notice of Class Certification; Order; Notice of Class Action

60. 8/23/90

Order

61. 9/4/90

Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Oppose, or to Oppose in Part, Plaintiffs' Motionfor Posting Notice of Certification

62. 9/6/90

Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time

63. 9/6/90

order

64. 9/17/90

Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum in Support of Entry of Order Requiring Defendants to Post Notice

65. 8/15/90

Memorandum in Support of Proposed Scheduling Order

66.

9/26/90

Transcript of Status Call Before the Hon. Thomas Hogan

gamimu/permanent/garnickl4s

08/04/03 12:55 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

@OO8

67. 9/27/90 68. 10/18/90 69. 10/18/90 70. 10/20/90 71. 10/30/90 72. 11/15/90
73. 9/24/90
74. 12/18/90 75. 12/10/90 76. 12/4/90 77. 12/4/90
78. 12/21 /90 79. 12/23/90 80. 12/19/90

Order
Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' First Set of Document Requests
Defendants' Answers to Plaintiffs1 First Set of Interrogatories
Motionfor Stay and Memorandum of Points and Authorities in support Thereof
subpoena to take deposition upon oral examination of Patricia Button
Plaintiffs' Statement of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses incurred in Connection with Motion for Sanctions
Plaintiffs' Motion for Sanctions and For entry of Second Order Compelling Discovery
Subpoena
Plaintiffs Motin to Enlarge Time in Which to Complete Discovery and File Dispositive Motions
Defendants'Supplemental Response to Plaintiffs'First Set of Document Requests
Defendants' Supplemental Answers to Plaintiffs' First
Set of Interrogatories
Subpoenas for Patricia Britton; ARthur Graves
Plaintiffs' Motion for Order Compelling Defendants To Supplement Responses to Outstanding Discovery Transcript of Status Call Before the Honorable Thomas F. Hogan

garnimu/permanent/garnickl4s

08/04/03 12:55 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

©009

81.

1/15/91

82. 1/23/91 83. 1/25/91
84. 1/28/91
S5. 1/29/91 86. 1/30/91
87. 1/18/91 88. 1/30/91 89. 2/1/91 90. 2/6/91
91. 2/13/91
92. 2/13/91 93. 2/25/91
94. 2/28/91 95. 3/5/91

Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Sanctions; memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Sanctions
Order.
Sxibpoena for Holly Simpson; Walter Ridley, Donald Soskin; Emma Guider; Herman Branson; Dalton Allen
Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Sanctions
Order.
Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Oppose Plaintiffs' Second Motion for Sanctions
Transcript
Deposition of Arthur Graves
Order
Plaintiffs' Supplemental Submission in Connection with Their Second Motion for Sanctions
Plaintiffs Supplemental Submission in Connection with the Hearing Held February 13,1991
Memorandum Opinion
Plaintiffs' Submission of Statement of Facts Deemed Established; Order Regarding Facts Deemed Established
Order
Plaintiffs' Statement of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses Incurred in Connection with Their Second Motion for Sanctions

garnimu/permanent/garnìcki4s

08/04/03 12:55 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

@OIO

96. 3/7/91 97. 3/8/91 98. 3/12/91
99. 3/12/91
100. 3/13/91 101. 3/14/91 102. 3/15/91 103. 3/19/91 104. 3/19/91 105. 3/21/91 106. 3/21/91
107. 3/25/91
108. 4/1/91
109. 4/2/91

Declaration (Patricia Johnson)
Declaration (Arthur Graves)
Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Discovery Period; Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion to Extend Discovery Period; Order
Defendant District of Columbia's Written Response to Plaintiffs Submission of Facts to Be Deemed Established
Order
Order
Notice of Filing
Plaintiffs' Motion for A Protective Order or in the Alternative, an Order Staying the Depositions
Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of their Submission of Statement of Facts Deemed Established
Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for a Protective Order
Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiffs' Statemen of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses; order; Order
Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Their Motion for a Protective Order or in The Alternative, an Order Staying the Depositions
Defendant District of Columbia's Response to Plaintiffs' Statement of Attorneys' Fees and Expenses Incurred in Connection with Their Second Motion for Sanctions
Notice of Filing

garnimu/permanent/garnickl4s

08/04/03 12:55 FAX 202 942 5212

ARNOLD & PORTER

@]Oll

110. 4/3/91
111. 4/10/91 112. 5/13/91 113. 5/13/91
114. 5/30/91
115. 6/13/91
116. 6/14/91 117. 6/17/91 118. 6/17/91 119. 6/24/91 120. 6/24/91 121. 6/27/91 122. 7/3/91

Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Statement of Fees and Expenses Incurred in Connection with Their Second Motion for Sanctions
Memorandum Opinion; Order
Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Submit Their Dispositive Motion
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment; Certificate of Service; Plaintiffs' Statement of Material Facts; Plaintiffs' Motion for summary Judgment
Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Submit Their Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion for Summary Judgment
Defendants' Motion for Final Enlargement of Time to Submit Their Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment
Opposition of Plaintiffs to Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time
Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time
Defendants' Memo of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiíïš' Motion For Summary Judgment
Order for enlargement of time to 6/13/91.
Order for enlargement of time to 6/17/91.
Reply Memo in Support of Plaintiffs' Motin for Summary Judgment
Defendants' Notice of Filing of Their Discovery Responses

garnirnu/permanent /garni ckl 4 s

^ 0 8 / 0 4 / 0 3 ^ 12:55 FAX _2O2 ^_42 5212 __ _ARNOLD &_PORTER . _ .

¾OI2

123. 8/30/91 124. 9/19/91 125. 9/19/91 126. 11/12/91 127. 11/14/91 128. 11/21/91 129. 11/25/91 130. 12/13/91 131. 12/20/91
132. 12/23/91
133. 1/3/92
134. 3/2/92 135. 3/18/92

Motion for Withdrawal of Appearance; Order
Supplemental Submission in Support of the Motion for Summary Judgment
Transcript of Hearing
Memorandum Opinion'
Order
Pro Se IntervenoT Motion for Relief from Order
Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Order Granting Summary Judgment on Count One (The Medical Claim)
Order
Defendants' Motion for an Enlargement of Time to Submit Their Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Granting Summary Judgment on Count One (The Medical Claim)
Defendants' Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Granting Summary Judgment on Count One (The Medical Claim)
Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Motionfor Reconsideration of the Order Granting Summary Judgment on Count One (Medical Claim)
Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of Compliance Order
Defendants' Motion for An Enlargement of Time to

garnimu/perTnanent/garnickl4s

 
 District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 1 of 27

CLOSED, TYPE-E
U.S. District Court District of Columbia (Washington, DC) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:90-cv-00793-TFH

GREEN, et al v. DC, et al Assigned to: Chief Judge Thomas F. Hogan Demand: $0 Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act

Date Filed: 04/05/1990 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff EDWARD GREEN

represented by Eric Robert Lotke 253 North Columbus Street Arlington, VA 22203-2648 (202) 276-9046 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Hilde E. Kahn ARNOLD & PORTER 555 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1206 (202) 942-5000 TERMINATED: 06/07/1999 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Murray R. Garnick ARNOLD & PORTER 555 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1206 (202) 942-5716 Fax: (202) 942-5999 TERMINATED: 06/07/1999 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN individually and on behalf of all others

Helene Blair Madonick ARNOLD & PORTER 555 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1206 (202) 942-5255 TERMINATED: 06/07/1999
represented by Cathy Hoffman ARNOLD & PORTER

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 2 of 27

similarly situated
Plaintiff TYRON T. ALSTON Plaintiff JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM

555 12th Street, NW Washington, DC 20004-1206 (202) 942-5000 Fax: (202) 942-5999 Email: cathy_hoffman@aporter.com TERMINATED: 06/07/1999 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eric Robert Lotke (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Hilde E. Kahn (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/07/1999 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Murray R. Garnick (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/07/1999 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Helene Blair Madonick (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/07/1999
represented by TYRON T. ALSTON NORTHEAST OHIO CORRECTIONAL CENTER CCA/NE 2240 Hubbard Road Youngstown, OH 44505 PRO SE
Eric Robert Lotke (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM R08587-007 ALLENWOOD UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY High Security P.O. Box 3500

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 3 of 27

Plaintiff RODDY MCDOWELL
Plaintiff WILBUR E. COOK
Plaintiff TRACY PINKNEY
Plaintiff STANLEY L. PETTY, JR.
Plaintiff JOHN GREENUP
Plaintiff JAMES HENRY WATSON

White Deer, PA 17887 PRO SE
represented by RODDY MCDOWELL VDOC# 264-742 4 LEAVENWORTH FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 1300 Metropolitan Leavenworth, KS 66048-2222 PRO SE
represented by WILBUR E. COOK VDOC# 268-181 LEAVENWORTH FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 1300 Metropolitan Leavenworth, KS 66048-2222 PRO SE
represented by TRACY PINKNEY R12085-007 ATLANTA UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY 601 McDonough Boulevard, SE Atlanta, GA 30315 PRO SE
represented by STANLEY L. PETTY, JR. DC 267-564 LEAVENWORTH FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 1300 Metropolitan Leavenworth, KS 66048-2222 PRO SE
represented by JOHN GREENUP R#266-340/2B16 LEAVENWORTH FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION 1300 Metropolitan Leavenworth, KS 66048-2222 PRO SE
represented by JAMES HENRY WATSON

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 4 of 27

Plaintiff GERALD JOHNSON
Plaintiff JERRY J. BENNETT
Plaintiff BRUCE LEVARN MENTION
Plaintiff MICHAEL T. WATKINS
V. Defendant DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

R06232-007 ATLANTA UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY 601 McDonough Boulevard, SE Atlanta, GA 30315 PRO SE
represented by GERALD JOHNSON DCDC# 232-141 CENTRAL ARIZONA DETENTION CENTER -CCA P.O. Box 6400 Florence, AZ 85232 PRO SE
represented by JERRY J. BENNETT DCDC# 256-709 CENTRAL ARIZONA DETENTION CENTER 1155 North Pinal Parkway Florence, AZ 85232 PRO SE
represented by BRUCE LEVARN MENTION R30372-120 TERRE HAUTE UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY P.O. Box 33 Terre Haute, IN 47808-0033 PRO SE
represented by MICHAEL T. WATKINS VA 289-206 41-101 LAWRENCEVILLE CORRECTION CENTER 1607 Planters Road Lawrence, VA 23868 PRO SE
represented by Kenneth Marty 7533 Westmore Drive Springfield, VA 22150-4271

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 5 of 27

Defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY Director, D.C. Dept. of Corrections
Intervenor BRIAN A. BROWN
Plaintiff MORRIS J. WARREN

(703) 569-4518 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Richard Stuart Love OFFICE OF CORPORATION COUNSEL, D.C. 441 Fourth Street, NW 6th Floor Washington, DC 20001-4600 (202) 727-6295 Email: richard.love@dc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Kenneth Marty (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Richard Stuart Love (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by BRIAN A. BROWN DC 194-004 Annex MARYLAND HOUSE OF CORRECTIONS P.O. Box 534 Jessup, MD 20794 PRO SE
represented by MORRIS J. WARREN R05203-016 LEWISBURG UNITED STATES PENITENTIARY P.O. Box 1000 Lewisburg, PA 17837 PRO SE

Date Filed 04/05/1990

#

Docket Text

1 COMPLAINT filed; Attachment; summons (3) issued (ew) (Entered: 04/10/1990)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 6 of 27

04/05/1990 04/06/1990 04/23/1990 04/23/1990 04/25/1990 04/27/1990
05/29/1990 05/30/1990
06/01/1990
06/01/1990 06/01/1990 06/05/1990 06/06/1990 06/06/1990

2 MOTION by plaintiff to certify class action (ew) (Entered: 04/10/1990)
3 RETURN OF SERVICE executed as to defendant DC (Served upon Helen Mathis), defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY (Served upon Gloria Thaxton) on 4/5/90 by process server (jda) (Entered: 04/10/1990)
4 REQUEST by plaintiff EDWARD GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY for production of documents (jda) (Entered: 04/24/1990)
5 INTERROGATORIES filed by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY (jda) (Entered: 04/24/1990)
6 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to answer to 5/25/90 and to oppose plaintiff's moiton for class certification (jda) (Entered: 04/26/1990)
7 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN in opposition to motion to extend time to answer to 5/25/90 and to oppose plaintiff's moiton for class certification [6-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (jda) (Entered: 04/30/1990)
8 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to answer to 6/5/90 , and to extend time to 6/5/90 to oppose plaintiff's motion for class certification (jda) (Entered: 05/31/1990)
11 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to answer to 6/5/90 [8-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC, granting motion to extend time to 6/5/90 to oppose plaintiff's motion for class certification [8-2] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC answer due 6/5/90 (N) (jda) (Entered: 06/04/1990)
9 MOTION by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to extend time to respond to DERWIN STRAITE's motion to clarify or redefine the proposed class (jda) (Entered: 06/04/1990)
10 MOTION by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order (jda) (Entered: 06/04/1990)
12 MOTION by DERWIN B. STRAITE to clarify or redefine the proposed class , or to consolidate the proposed classes CA 89-1204 & CA 90-793 (fiat) HOGAN, J. (jda) (Entered: 06/05/1990)
13 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to answer and to oppose plaintiff's motion for class certification to 6/6/90 (jda) (Entered: 06/06/1990)
14 ANSWER for defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY , (jda) (Entered: 06/07/1990)
15 RESPONSE by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY in

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 7 of 27

06/06/1990 06/12/1990 06/15/1990 06/20/1990 06/26/1990 06/26/1990
06/26/1990
06/27/1990 07/03/1990
07/05/1990 07/05/1990
07/09/1990

opposition to motion to certify class action [2-1] by EDWARD GREEN (jda) (Entered: 06/07/1990)
CALENDARED CD/N (jda) (Entered: 06/07/1990)
16 REPLY by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to response to motion to certify class action [2-1] by EDWARD - GREEN (jda) (Entered: 06/14/1990)
17 MOTION by plaintiff EDWARD GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to compel discovery , and for payment of expenses ; Exhibit (jda) (Entered: 06/20/1990)
18 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to 6/27/90 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order (jda) (Entered: 06/21/1990)
19 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan: granting motion to extend time to answer and to oppose plaintiff's motion for class certification to 6/6/90 [13-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (pob) (Entered: 06/27/1990)
20 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan: granting motion to extend time to respond to DERWIN STRAITE's motion to clarify or redefine the proposed class [9-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN (N) (pob) (Entered: 06/27/1990)
21 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan: granting motion to extend time to 6/27/90 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order [18-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (pob) (Entered: 06/27/1990)
22 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to 6/29/90 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order (jda) (Entered: 06/28/1990)
23 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 6/29/90 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order [22-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (jda) (Entered: 07/06/1990)
24 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to 7/12/90 to file opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery (jda) (Entered: 07/06/1990)
25 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time nunc pro tunc to 7/5/90 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order ; EXHIBIT (Opposition) (jda) (Entered: 07/06/1990)
27 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 7/12/90 to file opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery [24-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC response to motion due 7/12/90 for WALTER B. RIDLEY, for DC ; (N) (jda) (Entered: 07/11/1990)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 8 of 27

07/09/1990 07/09/1990 07/10/1990 07/11/1990 07/12/1990 07/12/1990 07/13/1990 07/17/1990
07/27/1990
08/06/1990 08/17/1990 08/20/1990

28 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time nunc pro tunc to 7/9/90 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order [25-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (jda) (Entered: 07/11/1990)
29 RESPONSE by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY in opposition to motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order [10-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN (jda) (Entered: 07/11/1990)
26 RESPONSE by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN in opposition to motion to extend time to 7/12/90 to file opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery [24-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (jda) (Entered: 07/11/1990)
30 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY for protective order staying discovery (jda) (Entered: 07/12/1990)
31 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to 7/11/90 nunc pro tunc to respond to plaintiffs' first set of interrogatories and to plaintiffs' first set of document requests, or to file a motion for a protective order (jda) (Entered: 07/13/1990)
32 RESPONSE by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY in opposition to motion to compel discovery [17-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN (jda) (Entered: 07/13/1990)
33 REPLY by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to response to motion for a scheduling conference and for entry of a scheduling order [10-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN (jda) (Entered: 07/13/1990)
34 RESPONSE by plaintiff EDWARD GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to motion for protective order staying discovery [30-1] and motion to extend time to 7/11/90 nunc pro tunc to respond to plaintiffs' first set of interrogatories and to plaintiffs' first set of document requests, or to file a motion for a protective order [31-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC and Reply to defendants' opposition to plaintiffs' motion to compel discovery (jda) (Entered: 07/18/1990)
35 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to certify class action [2-1] by EDWARD - GREEN; parties shall file with the Court by 8/15/90, if they have not already done so, a proposed scheduling order recommending a timely discovery schedule, and schedule for filing and hearing preliminary legal and disposition motions; status conference set for 9:45 8/22/90 in Courtroom 9. (N) (bm) (Entered: 07/30/1990)
36 MOTION to intervene by movant BRIAN A. BROWN (ajr) (Entered: 08/09/1990)
38 MOTION by intervenor-movant BRIAN A. BROWN to intervene ; Exhibit (1) (jda) (Entered: 08/22/1990)
37 MOTION by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 9 of 27

08/22/1990 08/23/1990
08/30/1990 09/04/1990 09/06/1990
09/06/1990 09/17/1990
09/19/1990 09/20/1990 09/24/1990 09/26/1990 09/27/1990

WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN for order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (d)(2) requiring defendants to post notice of certification ; Exhibit (1) (ker) (Entered: 08/21/1990)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : reporter: A. Thomson (gew) (Entered: 08/23/1990)
39 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : status hearing set for 9:30 9/26/90 ; , response to request for production of documents due 9/19/90 , discovery due 12/14/90 ; dispositive motions due 1/11/91 ; the District to designate a representative of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections to be responsible for discovery and coordination of this litigation (N) (clv) (Entered: 08/24/1990)
40 TRANSCRIPT filed for dates of 8/22/90 reporter: A. Thomson (ajr) (Entered: 08/30/1990)
41 MOTION by defendants to extend time to 9/11/90 to oppose, or to oppose in part, plaintiffs motion for posting notice of certification (ela) (Entered: 09/05/1990)
42 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 9/11/90 to oppose, or to oppose in part, plaintiffs motion for posting notice of certification [41-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC; nunc pro tunc response to motion due 9/11/90 for WALTER B. RIDLEY, for DC ; (N) (cjp) (Entered: 09/07/1990)
43 RESPONSE by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants motion for extension of time to oppose, or to oppose in part, plaintiffs motion for posting notice of certification (ela) (Entered: 09/10/1990)
44 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to motion for order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (d)(2) requiring defendants to post notice of certification [37-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN (ela) (Entered: 09/18/1990)
45 NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION of WILLIAM CATO by plaintiffs (ela) (Entered: 09/20/1990)
46 NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION of William Cato by plaintiffs EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (ela) (Entered: 09/21/1990)
47 MOTION by plaintiffs for sanctions and for entry of second order compelling discovery , exhibit A (ela) (Entered: 09/25/1990)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : reporter: A. Thomson (gew) (Entered: 09/27/1990)
48 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23 (d)(2) requiring defendants to post notice of certification [37-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN status hearing set for 9:15 10/31/90 ; (N) (gew) (Entered: 09/28/1990)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 10 of 27

10/01/1990 11/01/1990 11/01/1990 11/05/1990 12/10/1990
12/19/1990 12/28/1990 01/02/1991 01/15/1991 01/18/1991 01/23/1991 01/28/1991 01/29/1991
01/30/1991 02/01/1991 02/04/1991

49 TRANSCRIPT filed for date of 9/26/90 reporter: A.J. THOMSON (ela) (Entered: 10/01/1990)
50 NOTICE TO TAKE DEPOSITION of Patricia Britton by plaintiffs (ela) (Entered: 11/12/1990)
52 REQUEST by intervenor BRIAN A. BROWN for injunctive relief and preliminary hearing , Rule 109 Certificate, attachment (ela) (Entered: 11/15/1990)
51 MOTION by Grant Anderson to intervene (ela) (Entered: 11/15/1990)
53 MOTION by plaintiffs EDWARD - GREEN and ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to extend time to 3/15/91 to complete discovery and to enlarge time until 4/15/91 to file dispositive motions (ela) (Entered: 12/12/1990)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : reporter: A. Thomson (gew) (Entered: 12/20/1990)
54 MOTION by plaintiffs EDWARD - GREEN and ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to compel defendants to supplement responses to outstanding discovery , exhibits A&B. (ela) (Entered: 01/02/1991)
55 TRANSCRIPT filed for date of 12/19/90 reporter: A.J. Thomson (ela) (Entered: 01/03/1991)
56 MOTION (SECOND) by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN for sanctions , exibits A-K (ela) (Entered: 01/16/1991)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : reporter: A. Thomson (gew) (Entered: 01/18/1991)
57 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : motion hearing set for 11:00 2/5/91 ; (N) (gew) (Entered: 01/25/1991)
58 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to 1/30/91 to oppose plaintiffs second motion for sanctions (ela) (Entered: 01/29/1991)
60 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 1/30/91 to oppose plaintiffs second motion for sanctions [58-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC response to motion due 1/30/91 for DC ; no more extensions will be granted (N) (mf) (Entered: 02/04/1991)
59 MOTION by plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to extend time to 2/6/91 to respont to second motion for sanctions (mf) (Entered: 02/04/1991)
62 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : motion's hearing for sanctions set for 02/13/91 at 9:30 am. (N) (gew) (Entered: 02/05/1991)
61 TRANSCRIPT filed for date of 1/18/91 reporter: A.J. Thomson (ela) (Entered: 02/05/1991)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 11 of 27

02/06/1991 02/13/1991 02/13/1991 02/13/1991
02/25/1991 02/27/1991 02/28/1991
03/05/1991 03/12/1991 03/12/1991 03/13/1991
03/14/1991

63 NOTICE OF FILING of supplemental submission in connection with their second motion for sanctions, exhibit A by plaintiff EDWARD GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (ela) (Entered: 02/07/1991)
64 NOTICE OF FILING of supplemental submission in connection with the hearing held 2/13/91, exhibit A, by plaintiffs (ela) (Entered: 02/14/1991)
65 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Thomas F. Hogan (N) (gew) (Entered: 02/14/1991)
66 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for sanctions [561] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN status hearing set for 1:45 2/27/91 ; directing defendants to pay the reasonable costs and attorneys' fees incurred by the plaintiff in filing their Second Motion for Sanctions; directing plaintiffs prior to 02/17/91 status conference, to submit an appropriate statement of facts to be taken as established for purposes of this action. (N) (gew) (Entered: 02/14/1991)
67 TRANSCRIPT filed for date of 2/13/91 reporter: A.J. THOMSON (ela) (Entered: 02/25/1991)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : reporter: A. Thomson (gew) (Entered: 02/28/1991)
68 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan :directing defendants to submit affidavits attesting to the fact that notice to this class action has been posted in the Receiving Facilities by 03/08/91; defendants to file an opposition to Plaintiffs' Submission of Statement of Facts Deemed Established by 03/12/91; Platiniffs to file a reply to defendants' opposition by 03/19/91; setting a status call on 04/09/91 at 9:15 am. (N) (gew) (Entered: 03/04/1991)
69 NOTICE OF FILING of statement of attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in connection with their second motion for sanctions, exhibits A-E by plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (ela) (Entered: 03/06/1991)
70 MOTION by plaintiffs to extend discovery 3/29/91 (ela) (Entered: 03/13/1991)
71 NOTICE OF FILING of written response to plaintiff's submission of facts to be deemed established by defendant DC (ela) (Entered: 03/13/1991)
72 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend discovery 3/29/91 [70-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN for the sole purpose of allowing the depositions of Dr. Dalton Allen, Edward Green and Ernest DeGraffin (N) (bm) (Entered: 03/13/1991)
73 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE (SECOND), attachments by defendants DC and WALTER B. RIDLEY to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories (ela) (Entered: 03/14/1991)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 12 of 27

03/14/1991 03/14/1991
03/15/1991 03/19/1991 03/19/1991 03/19/1991 03/19/1991 03/21/1991 03/21/1991 03/21/1991
03/25/1991
03/26/1991 03/26/1991 04/01/1991

74 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE (SECOND), attachment by defendants DC and WALTER B. RIDLEY to plaintiffs first request for the production of documents (ela) (Entered: 03/14/1991)
75 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend discovery 3/29/91, for the sole purpose of allowing the depositions of Dr. Dalton Allen, Edward Green and Ernest DeGraffin [70-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN (N) (ela) (Entered: 03/18/1991)
76 NOTICE OF FILING of Written Response to Plaintiffs' Submission of Facts to be deemed established by defendant DC (ela) (Entered: 03/19/1991)
77 MOTION by intervenor BRIAN A. BROWN to extend time to file statement of facts (ela) (Entered: 03/22/1991)
78 MOTION by intervenor BRIAN A. BROWN for injunctive relief (ela) (Entered: 03/22/1991)
79 MOTION by plaintiffs for protective order , or in the alternative, an order staying the depositions (ela) (Entered: 03/22/1991)
80 REPLY by plaintiffs to file notice [76-1] by DC, exhibit A (ela) (Entered: 03/22/1991)
81 RESPONSE by defendants in opposition to motion for protective order [79-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN (ela) (Entered: 03/22/1991)
82 MOTION by defendants to extend time to 4/1/91 to respond to plaintiffs' statement of attorneys' fees and expenses (ela) (Entered: 03/22/1991)
86 ORDER granting plaintiffs' motion. The period of time within which defendants must respond to plaintiffs' motion for a protective order or in the alternative an order staying the depositions is shortened and any response by defendants is due no later than 3/22/91 by Judge Stanley S. Harris : (N) (ela) (Entered: 04/02/1991)
83 REPLY by plaintiffs in support of their motion for protective order [791] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN, motion or in the alternative, an order staying the depositions [79-2] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN (ela) (Entered: 03/28/1991)
84 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 4/1/91 to respond to plaintiffs' statement of attorneys' fees and expenses [82-1] by DC (N) (ela) (Entered: 03/28/1991)
85 TRANSCRIPT filed for date of 2/27/91 reporter: A.J. THOMSON (ela) (Entered: 03/28/1991)
87 RESPONSE by defendant DC to plaintiffs statement of attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in connection with their motion for sanctions (ela)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 13 of 27

04/02/1991 04/03/1991 04/09/1991 04/10/1991 04/10/1991
04/10/1991 05/13/1991 05/13/1991 05/14/1991 05/30/1991 06/03/1991 06/06/1991 06/13/1991 06/14/1991

(Entered: 04/05/1991)
88 NOTICE OF FILING of declaration of Patricia D. Johnson, attachment and declaration of Arthur F. Graves, attachment by defendants DC and WALTER B. RIDLEY (ela) (Entered: 04/05/1991)
89 REPLY by plaintiffs in support of its statement of fees and expenses incurred in connection with their second motion for sanctions (ela) (Entered: 04/05/1991)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : reporter: A. Thomson (gew) (Entered: 04/10/1991)
90 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Thomas F. Hogan (N) (lin) (Entered: 04/10/1991)
91 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : denying motion for protective order [79-1] and granting motion staying the depositions [79-2] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN dispositive motions due 5/13/91 ; (N) (lin) (Entered: 04/10/1991)
92 TRANSCRIPT filed for date of 4/9/91 reporter: T.C. BITSKO, Miller Reporting Co., Inc. (ela) (Entered: 04/10/1991)
93 MOTION by plaintiff EDWARD GREEN, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN for summary judgment ; Exhibits (7) (ks) (Entered: 05/14/1991)
94 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to 5/20/91 to file their dispositive motion (ks) (Entered: 05/14/1991)
95 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 5/20/91 to file their dispositive motion [94-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (ks) (Entered: 05/17/1991)
96 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment to 6/6/91 (ks) (Entered: 05/31/1991)
97 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment to 6/6/91 [96-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (ks) (Entered: 06/04/1991)
98 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to extend time to 6/13/91 to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (ks) (Entered: 06/07/1991)
99 MOTION by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY for a final extension of time to 6/17/91 in which to oppose plaintiffs' motion for summary judgement (ajr) (Entered: 06/14/1991)
100 RESPONSE by plaintiffs EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN in opposition to motion for a final extension of time to 6/17/91 in which to oppose plaintiffs' motion for summary judgement [99-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC; Attachments (ks) (Entered:

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 14 of 27

06/17/1991
06/17/1991
06/24/1991
06/24/1991
07/03/1991 07/03/1991 07/03/1991 07/03/1991 07/03/1991 08/30/1991 08/30/1991
09/03/1991
09/19/1991

06/14/1991)
101 REPLY by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY to response to motion for a final extension of time to 6/17/91 in which to oppose plaintiffs' motion for summary judgement [99-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (ajr) (Entered: 06/18/1991)
102 RESPONSE by defendant DC, defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY in opposition to motion for summary judgment [93-1] by ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN. Exhibits (3) (ajr) (Entered: 06/18/1991)
103 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for a final extension of time to 6/17/91 (NUNC PRO TUNC) in which to oppose plaintiffs' motion for summary judgement [99-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (ajr) (Entered: 06/24/1991)
104 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 6/13/91 ("NUNC PRO TUNC") to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for summary judgment [98-1] by WALTER B. RIDLEY, DC (N) (ajr) (Entered: 06/25/1991)
105 ANSWER by defendant DC to plaintiff's first set of interrogatories; Attachments (12) (ks) (Entered: 07/03/1991)
106 RESPONSE by defendant DC to first request for production of documents; Exhibits (70); Attachments (15) (bulky) (ks) (Entered: 07/03/1991)
107 ANSWER (supplemental) by defendant DC to interrogatories; Attachents (bulky) (ks) (Entered: 07/03/1991)
108 RESPONSE (supplemental) by defendant DC to request for production of documents (ks) (Entered: 07/03/1991)
109 NOTICE OF FILING by defendant DC of their discovery responses (ks) (Entered: 07/03/1991)
110 MOTION by intervenor BRIAN A. BROWN for orders in response to pleadings (ajr) (Entered: 08/30/1991)
111 MOTION by Grace M. Lopes for plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff EDWARD - GREEN to withdraw as attorney for ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN (ajr) (Entered: 09/03/1991)
112 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to withdraw Grace M. Lopes as attorney for ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN [111-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (N) (ks) (Entered: 09/04/1991)
113 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to motion for summary judgment [93-1] by EDWARD - GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN. Attachment (ajr) (Entered: 09/20/1991)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 15 of 27

10/17/1991 11/12/1991 11/12/1991
11/14/1991 11/18/1991 11/25/1991 12/11/1991 12/13/1991
12/20/1991
12/20/1991 12/23/1991 12/24/1991
12/30/1991 01/03/1992

114 TRANSCRIPT filed of Hearing for date(s) of 9/19/91 reporter: Anneliese Thomson (ks) (Entered: 10/18/1991)
115 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Thomas F. Hogan (N) (ks) (Entered: 11/12/1991)
116 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting defendants motion for summary judgment with respect to count one, and with respect to count three; plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is granted with respect to count two (N) (ks) (Entered: 11/12/1991)
117 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : that the list attached to this Order is incorporated as Attachment A to the November 12, 1991 Opinion (N) (ks) (Entered: 11/14/1991)
119 LETTER dated 11/9/91 to Judge Hogan from Inmate John Doe Smith; Attachment (1) "Let this be filed" (fiat) JUDGE HOGAN (ks) (Entered: 12/03/1991)
118 MOTION by plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff EDWARD GREEN for reconsideration of Order granting summary judgment on Count one (ks) (Entered: 11/27/1991)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : reporter: A Thomson (lin) (Entered: 12/11/1991)
120 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : defendant's to file any motions with respect to the implementation of the Court's Opinion and Order due 12/20/91; and response due 1/3/92; defendant's response to motion for reconsideration due 12/20/91 ; reply to motion due 1/3/92 ; (N) (ks) (Entered: 12/16/1991)
121 MOTION filed by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to extend time to 12/23/91 in which to respond to plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of order granting summary judgement on Count 1 (ajr) (Entered: 12/23/1991)
122 TRANSCRIPT filed for date(s) of 12/11/91 reporter: Anneliese J. Thomson (tmp) (Entered: 12/23/1991)
123 RESPONSE by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC in opposition to motion [118-1] by plaintiffs for reconsideration (ajr) (Entered: 12/24/1991)
124 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 12/23/91 in which to respond to plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration of order granting summary judgement on Count 1 [121-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (N) (ajr) (Entered: 12/24/1991)
125 MOTION filed by intervenor BRIAN A. BROWN to stay Order entered on 12/13/91 (ks) (Entered: 12/31/1991)
126 REPLY by plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff EDWARD GREEN to response to their motion for reconsideration of the

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 16 of 27

03/02/1992 03/18/1992 03/19/1992 03/24/1992 03/25/1992 03/30/1992 04/01/1992
04/02/1992 04/24/1992 05/04/1992

Order granting summary judgment on Count One; Exhibit (1) (ks) (Entered: 01/06/1992)
127 MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN for entry of compliance Order ; Exhibit (1) (ks) (Entered: 03/03/1992)
128 MOTION filed by defendants to extend time to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for entry of a compliance order to 3/23/92 (ks) (Entered: 03/19/1992)
129 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for entry of a compliance order to 3/23/92 [128-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (N) (ks) (Entered: 03/20/1992)
130 RESPONSE by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC in opposition to motion for entry of compliance Order [127-1] by EDWARD - GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN. Attachments (4) (ajr) (Entered: 03/25/1992)
131 MOTION filed by defendants to extend time, nunc pro tunc to 3/24/92 to file thier opposition to plaintiffs' motion for entry of a compliance order (ks) (Entered: 03/26/1992)
132 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time, nunc pro tunc to 3/24/92 to file thier opposition to plaintiffs' motion for entry of a compliance order [131-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (N) (ks) (Entered: 03/30/1992)
133 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Judge Thomas F. Hogan that plaintiffs' motion for reconsideration is granted; and that the class certified on 7/27/90 is hereby decertified for purposes of count one of the complaint, the medical claim, and all other remaining individual claims; and that the stay imposed in all repated civil cases is hereby lifted; and that all of the cases shall be transferred to the calendar committee for reassignment to the original assigned Judge or for random reassignment, as appropriate (N) (ks) Modified on 04/01/1992 (Entered: 04/01/1992)
134 REPLY by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN to response to motion for entry of compliance Order [127-1] by EDWARD - GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN; Attachments (ks) (Entered: 04/02/1992)
ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : that the DC to provide Court with current addresses of each of the plaintiffs; and that the attorneys for the class in the above captioned case shall provide the Court with any addresses in their possession for the plaintiffs in attached list on or before 5/4/92 (N) (ks) (Entered: 04/27/1992)
136 NOTICE OF FILING by plaintiff(s) of compliance with Court's Order of 4/24/92, submitting addresses of prisoner pro ses; Attachment (1) (ks) (Entered: 05/05/1992)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 17 of 27

05/13/1992 05/14/1992 05/18/1992 05/20/1992 05/20/1992 06/01/1992 06/08/1992
06/16/1992 06/24/1992 06/30/1992 07/02/1992 07/07/1992 07/15/1992

137 MOTION filed by defendant DC for leave to file out of time the responses required by order of 4/24/92 EXHIBIT (response to order) (ajr) (Entered: 05/15/1992)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : Defendant's Exhibit 1-Agreement between Kenny W. Armstrong and Corrections Corporation of America filed in court jacket. Courtreporter- Anneliese Thomson (gew) (Entered: 05/15/1992)
138 SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM to motion for entry of compliance Order [127-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN; Attachments (ks) (Entered: 05/18/1992)
139 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for leave to file out of time the responses required by Order of 4/24/92 [137-1] by DC (N) (ks) (Entered: 05/20/1992)
181 NOTICE OF FILING by defendant DC of the list of the current addresses of the plaintiffs in the individual cases related to the class action. Attachment (ajr) (Entered: 01/28/1993)
140 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN in opposition to D.C.'s proposed compliance Order (ks) (Entered: 06/02/1992)
141 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for entry of compliance Order [127-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN; that defendants shall serve on plaintiffs within 15 days a report that details the defendants' compliance with the Nov. 12 and 14 Orders, using the form attached to this Order; Attachment (1) (N) (ks) Modified on 06/08/1992 (Entered: 06/08/1992)
142 MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN for certification , or in the alternative to reopen discovery (ks) (Entered: 06/16/1992)
143 MOTION filed by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to extend time to file their compliance report to 7/7/92 (ks) (Entered: 06/25/1992)
144 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to file their compliance report to 7/7/92 [143-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (N) (ks) (Entered: 06/30/1992)
145 MOTION filed by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to extend time to 7/17/92 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for certification per 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or to reopen discovery (ajr) (Entered: 07/06/1992)
146 NOTICE OF FILING by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DCof initial compliance Report; Exhibit (1) (ks) (Entered: 07/08/1992)
147 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 7/17/92 to oppose plaintiffs' motion for certification per 28 U.S.C. 1292 (b) or to reopen discovery [145-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (N)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 18 of 27

07/15/1992
07/17/1992 07/20/1992
07/31/1992 08/04/1992
08/05/1992
08/10/1992 08/18/1992 08/26/1992 09/02/1992 09/09/1992 09/09/1992 09/15/1992

(ks) (Entered: 07/15/1992)
148 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : that parties to mail or deliver a copy of any future document filed with the Court, including any compliance reports to Magistrate Judge Robinson, Chambers (N) (ks) (Entered: 07/15/1992)
149 MOTION filed by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to extend time to 7/31/92 to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for certification (ks) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
150 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN in opposition to motion to extend time to 7/31/92 to file their opposition to plaintiff's motion for certification [1491] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (ks) (Entered: 07/21/1992)
151 MOTION filed by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to extend time to 8/14/92 to respond to plaintiffs' motion for certification or to re-open discovery (ajr) (Entered: 08/03/1992)
152 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : denying motion for certification [142-1] by EDWARD - GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN directing that the plaintiff may file a motion to reopen discovery with Magistrate Judge Robinson (ajr) (Entered: 08/04/1992)
153 RESPONSE by plaintiffs ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD - GREEN in opposition to motion to extend time to 8/14/92 to respond to plaintiffs' motion for certification or to re-open discovery [151-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (ajr) (Entered: 08/06/1992)
154 MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN for finding of contempt ; Exhibits (2) (ks) (Entered: 08/11/1992)
155 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : status hearing set for 2:00 9/9/92 ; defendant's response to show cause due 9/2/92 ; (N) (ks) (Entered: 08/19/1992)
156 RESPONSE by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to order to show cause [155-2]; Exhibits (ks) (Entered: 08/27/1992)
157 REPLY by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN to response to show cause order of 8/18/92 [156-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY; Exhibit (1) (ks) (Entered: 09/04/1992)
158 RESPONSE Report by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to order [117-1], order [116-1]; Exhibits (ks) (Entered: 09/09/1992)
SHOW CAUSE HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan reporter: Anneliese Thomson (gew) (Entered: 09/11/1992)
159 REPORT by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC for August 1992 in compliance with Orders of 11/12&14/91; Exhibits (7) (ks)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 19 of 27

09/18/1992 09/18/1992 09/25/1992
09/25/1992 10/05/1992 10/05/1992 10/07/1992 10/16/1992 10/26/1992 10/26/1992

(Entered: 09/16/1992)
160 NOTICE OF FILING by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DCof proposed Order relative to the hearing on plaintiffs' motion for contempt (ks) (Entered: 09/21/1992)
161 TRANSCRIPT filed of Hearing for date(s) of 9/9/92 Reporter: A. Thomson (ks) (Entered: 09/21/1992)
162 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : directing that the defendants shall pay a fine in the amount of $50.00 per day from 11/14/91 until such time as legal materials are made available to DC prisoners incarcerated in the West Tennessee Detention Facility in Mason, TN in full compliance with this Court's 11/12/91 and 11/14/91 orders, or, the Court rules that an adequate substitute for the legal materials exists; directing that the defendants shall pay a contempt fine in the amount of $50.00 per day from 8/1/92 to 9/9/92 for its contempt of this Court's 6/5/92 order; directing that the fines shall be deposited in the Registry of the Court pending further order of the Court for disbursement and these funds are not to be invested in the Court Registry Investment System; directing that the D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. and the defendants shall consult and provide to the Court a proposed list of legal materials to be purchased from this fund; directing that this Court's 6/5/92 order is modified to permit the defendants to file and serve compliance reports on the 15th of each month; further directing that the defendants shall pay the plaintiffs' reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in the bringing of their motion for a finding of contempt (N) (ajr) (Entered: 09/25/1992)
163 TRANSCRIPT filed of Hearing for date(s) of 5/14/92 Reporter: A. Thomson (ks) (Entered: 09/28/1992)
165 STIPULATION filed and fiated by Judge Thomas F. Hogan that defendants have thirty days from the date of this stipulation to place in said receiving facility law books mandated by the Court's Orders of 11/12/and14/91 (N) (ks) (Entered: 10/08/1992)
166 STIPULATED ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : regarding attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in connection with plaintiff's motion for finding of contempt (N) (ks) (Entered: 10/08/1992)
164 MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN for entry of judgment (ks) (Entered: 10/08/1992)
167 REPORT by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC for September 1992, in compliance with Orders of 11/12/91 and 11/14/91; Exhibits (ks) (Entered: 10/19/1992)
168 RESPONSE by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to` motion for entry of judgment [164-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (ks) (Entered: 10/27/1992)
169 JUDGMENT is entered for the class plaintiffs on their access to courts

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 20 of 27

10/26/1992
10/28/1992 10/30/1992 11/02/1992 11/16/1992 11/17/1992
11/17/1992 11/20/1992 11/20/1992 11/30/1992
12/01/1992 12/14/1992

claim; judgment is entered against the individual plaintiffs on their medical claim; and judgment is entered against the class plaintiffs on their programs claim; this judgment is without prejudice to all claims for damages filed in this court by the named plaintiffs or the individual members of the class (ks) (Entered: 10/27/1992)
170 NOTICE OF APPEAL by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC from order [162-2] entered on: 9/25/92; Government-no fee; Copies mailed to Murray R. Garnick, Jonathan M. Smith, and Elizabeth Symonds (ks) (Entered: 10/28/1992)
TRANSMITTED PRELIMINARY RECORD on appeal [170-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY to U.S. Court of Appeals (ks) (Entered: 10/28/1992)
USCA # 92-7221 assigned for appeal [170-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (ks) (Entered: 11/02/1992)
171 MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) for issuance of Rule 215 Order regarding attorneys' fees (ks) (Entered: 11/03/1992)
172 STATUS REPORT by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC for October, 1992 (ajr) (Entered: 11/17/1992)
173 NOTICE OF APPEAL by plaintiff(s) ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff(s) EDWARD GREEN from judgment entered on: 10/27/92; $5.00 filing fee and $100.00 docketing fee paid to U.S. Treasury; Copies mailed to Kenneth Marty and Jonathan M. Smith (ks) Modified on 11/18/1992 (Entered: 11/18/1992)
TRANSMITTED PRELIMINARY RECORD on appeal [173-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN to U.S. Court of Appeals (ks) (Entered: 11/18/1992)
USCA # 92-7227 assigned for appeal [173-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (ks) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
174 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : directing parties to confer and to attempt to reach agreement on attorneys' fees and status hearing set for 9:00 1/29/93 ; (N) (ks) (Entered: 11/24/1992)
175 NOTICE OF CROSS-APPEAL by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC from appeal entered 10/27/92 [173-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN; Government-no fee; copies mailed to Murray R. Garnick and Jonathan M. Smith (ks) (Entered: 12/01/1992)
TRANSMITTED PRELIMINARY RECORD on appeal [175-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY to U.S. Court of Appeals (ks) (Entered: 12/01/1992)
USCA # 92-7234 assigned for appeal [175-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY (ks) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 21 of 27

12/18/1992 12/18/1992 12/21/1992 12/22/1992
12/29/1992 01/15/1993 02/25/1993 07/22/1993 07/22/1993 07/23/1993
08/13/1993 08/26/1993 09/13/1993

176 COMPLIANCE REPORT by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC for October 1992; Exhibits (7) (ks) (Entered: 12/21/1992)
ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan on plaintiff's motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (fiat) (N) (ks) (Entered: 12/22/1992)
177 MOTION filed by plaintiff(s) to defer status conference regarding fees (ks) (Entered: 12/22/1992)
178 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to defer status conference regarding fees [177-1] by EDWARD - GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN status hearing set for <date not set> ; (N) (ajr) (Entered: 12/22/1992)
179 ORDER by Mag. Judge Deborah A. Robinson : granting plaintiff Luther M. Pugh's motion for substitution of Richard F. Silber as counsel. (N) (mal) (Entered: 01/06/1993)
180 COMPLIANCE REPORT by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC for December 1992; Exhibits (7) (ks) (Entered: 01/19/1993)
182 STATUS REPORT by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC. Attachments (ajr) (Entered: 02/26/1993)
CASE referral ended Mag. Judge Deborah A. Robinson (MJ) (bh) (Entered: 09/11/2000)
184 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION II of Mag. Judge Deborah A. Robinson. (Original filed in CA 89-405) (N) (mal) (Entered: 08/18/1993)
183 ORDER by Mag. Judge Deborah A. Robinson : requiring each plaintiff to file notice of current address and telephone number by 9 /15/92; allowing plaintiffs appearing on Appendix A to file amended complaint by 9/15/92; directing plaintiffs appearing on Appendix B to file amended complaint by 9/15/92 setting forth all harm suffered or to state that no such harm was suffered; directing plaintiffs on Appendix C to show cause by 9/15/92 why case should not be dismissed; requiring D.C. defendants to move by 10/30/92 with respect to each complaint or amended complaint filed by plaintiffs; Appendix D - Supplemental Order. (Original file in CA89-405) (N) (bh) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
185 NOTICE OF CHANGE OF ADDRESS by plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN . New address: Minimum Security Facility, P.O. Box 5000, Lorton, VA. 22199-0902 (ks) (Entered: 08/20/1993)
SCHEDULING NOTICE: in-court hearing on damages as to Bryant Brown set for 2:00 9/23/93 (mal) (Entered: 08/26/1993)
186 MOTION filed by plaintiffs ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN to reopen judgment for preliminary approval of settlement pursuant to Rule 60(B) ; Exhibit (1) (ks) (Entered: 09/14/1993)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 22 of 27

09/16/1993 09/24/1993
11/09/1993 11/09/1993 11/09/1993 12/02/1993 12/14/1993 12/23/1993 01/06/1994 01/06/1994 01/12/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994
02/10/1994 02/25/1994

187 ORDER by Mag. Judge Deborah A. Robinson postponing hearings on damages pending determination by a U.S. District Judge of the merits of the objections: (N) (bh) (Entered: 09/23/1993)
188 RESPONSE by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC to motion to reopen judgment for preliminary approval of settlement pursuant to Rule 60(B) [186-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (ks) (Entered: 09/27/1993)
189 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : remanded by USCA, further directing that this Court will consider the proposed settlement (N) (jjc) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
190 TRANSCRIPT filed of hearing for date of 11/9/93. Reporter: Anneliese Thomson (ks) (Entered: 11/10/1993)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : Reporter: Anneliese Thomson (gew) (Entered: 11/10/1993)
191 MOTION filed by defendants for clarification , or in the alternative for relief from order ; Attachments (ks) (Entered: 12/03/1993)
192 RESPONSE by plaintiffs in opposition to motion for clarification [191-1] or in the alternative for relief from order [191-2] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY; Exhibit (1) (ks) (Entered: 12/15/1993)
193 REPLY by defendants to response to motion for clarification [191-1] or for relief from order [191-2] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY; Attachments (ks) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
246 CERTIFIED COPY of docket sheet filed in USCA dated 1/4/94, on appeal [175-1], appeal [173-1] , remanding for further proceedings. USCA # 92-7221, 92-7227 & 92-7234 (cjp) (Entered: 11/22/2002)
196 CERTIFIED COPY of order filed in USCA dated 1/4/94, on appeal [1701] , remanding for further proceedings. USCA # 92-7221 (cjp) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
194 NOTICE OF FILING by plaintiffs of documents that establish that prisoners were transferred; Attachments (ks) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : Court Reporter John Finnegan (gew) (Entered: 02/07/1994)
195 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for clarification [191-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY; directing defendants to include in their quarterly reports information concerning the lenght of time that each of these prisoners is kept in on District of Columbia hospital facilities. (N) (gew) (Entered: 02/07/1994)
197 MOTION filed by plaintiffs ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, and EDWARD GREEN to issue notice ; EXHIBIT-NOTICE. (bm) (Entered: 02/14/1994)
198 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to issue Notice

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 23 of 27

02/25/1994 05/03/1994 05/26/1994 05/27/1994 06/01/1994 06/09/1994 06/13/1994 06/17/1994 07/01/1994 07/07/1994
07/08/1994

and Statement of proposed settlement of class suit [197-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN (N); Attachment (ks) (Entered: 02/28/1994)
200 NOTICE and STATEMENT of proposed settlement of class suit (ks) (Entered: 05/17/1994)
199 NOTICE by plaintiffs of compliance; Attachments (ks) (Entered: 05/04/1994)
201 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : fairness hearing set for 9:30 6/17/94 ; and that the attached letters will be made part of this record and served upon counsel for the parties ; Attachments (3) (N) (ks) (Entered: 05/26/1994)
202 NOTICE OF FILING by plaintiffs: Notice to bring suit for unliquidated damages sent to plaintiffs' counsel. (tth) Modified on 05/31/1994 (Entered: 05/31/1994)
203 NOTICE OF FILING by plaintiffs ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN of motion for objection to settlement Order sent to defendants' counsel, but not filed with the Court; Attachment (1) (ks) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
204 NOTICE OF FILING by plaintiffs of service upon Edward Green; Attachments (ks) (Entered: 06/10/1994)
205 RESPONSE by plaintiffs ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN to objections of certain class members to proposed class action settlement (ks) (Entered: 06/17/1994)
FAIRNESS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : Reporter: Anneliese Thomson (gew) (Entered: 06/20/1994)
206 MOTION filed by plaintiffs ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN for entry of order directing fee conference and granting extension of time to file fee petition (ks) Modified on 07/05/1994 (Entered: 07/05/1994)
207 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for entry of order directing fee conference and granting extension of time to file fee petition [206-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN status conference set for 9/29/94 at 9:15 a.m.; extending the time in which plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees shall be filed to 30 days beyond the date on which the status conference is held. (N) (bm) (Entered: 07/08/1994)
208 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan: approving the Settlement Agreement; plaintiffs' claims for injunctive and declaratory relief as set forth in plaintiffs' complaint in this action are dismissed with prejudice; the Court retain jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of enforcing the settlement agreement; directing the Clerk of the Court to enter this Order as a final judgment; attachment. (N) (bm) (Entered: 07/08/1994)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 24 of 27

07/08/1994 07/08/1994
07/27/1994 08/01/1994 09/20/1994 09/22/1994
11/16/1994 11/18/1994
01/10/1995 12/06/1995 12/19/1995
01/11/1996
09/10/1998 09/20/1998

209 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan: vacating order of 9/25/92 [162-2] (N) (bm) (Entered: 07/08/1994)
210 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan: modifying the 11/14//91 Order such that the list attached to the 11/14/91 Order is withdrawn and the list attached to this Order is incorporated as Attachment A to the 11/12/91 Opinion; attachment A. (N) (bm) (Entered: 07/08/1994)
211 RESPONSE by plaintiff EDWARD GREEN to Settlement Agreement [208-1] (ks) (Entered: 07/28/1994)
212 MEMORANDUM by plaintiff EDWARD GREEN re: Opposition to the Settlement Agreements; Attachments (2). (tth) (Entered: 08/02/1994)
213 MOTION filed by plaintiffs to reschedule status conference set for 9/29/94 (ks) (Entered: 09/21/1994)
214 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to reschedule status conference set for 9/29/94 [213-1] by EDWARD GREEN, ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN status hearing rescheduled for 9:00 11/22/94 ; and that the time for plaintiffs' motion for attorneys' fees is extended thirty (30) days beyond the date on which the aforesaid status conference is held (N) (ks) (Entered: 09/22/1994)
215 MOTION filed by plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff EDWARD GREEN to reschedule the status conference set for 11/22/94 (ks) (Entered: 11/17/1994)
216 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : status hearing set for 9:00 1/10/95; extending the time for 30 days in which attorneys' fees shall be filed beyond the date on which the aforesaid status conference is held. (N) (gew) (Entered: 11/23/1994)
STATUS HEARING before Judge Thomas F. Hogan : Reporter: Anneliese Thomson (gew) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
219 MOTION filed by defendants for clarification , or in the alternative for relief from order (ks) (Entered: 03/01/1996)
217 RESPONSE (OPPOSITIONS) by plaintiffs ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, EDWARD GREEN to motion for clarification or, in the alternative for relief from order [191-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY; attachment (blj) (Entered: 01/03/1996)
218 JOINT NOTICE OF FILING by defendants and plaintiffs of withdrawing defendant's motion for clarification or in the alternative for relief from Order and withdrawal of plaintiff's motion for contempt (ks) (Entered: 01/30/1996)
220 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : directing defendants to file a response to Plaintiffs' motion within forty-five (45) days of the date of this order. (N) (gew) (Entered: 09/10/1998)
221 MOTION filed by plaintiff TYRON T. ALSTON to enforce a judgment

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 25 of 27

02/12/1999 05/06/1999 06/03/1999
06/29/1999 07/01/1999
07/08/1999 07/09/1999 08/02/1999
09/08/1999 09/30/1999 09/30/1999

dated November 12, 1991 (fiat) J. Hogan. (lkn) (Entered: 09/25/1998)
222 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : defendant's response to plaintiff's motion due 3/15/99 ; (N) (gew) (Entered: 02/12/1999)
223 RESPONSE by defendant DC to order defendant's response to plaintiff's motion due 3/15/99 ; [222-1], order [222-2]; Exhibits (2). (lkn) (Entered: 05/07/1999)
224 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan for Stanley S.Harris: directing the defendant DC to show cause why it should not be bound by this Court's 11/12/91 memorandum opinion and order and that order should not be vacated due 6/30/99 , and any response to defendant DC's filing to show cause due 7/15/99; , and any reply brief due 7/30/99 ; (N) (jeb) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
225 JOINT MOTION by defendant DC to extend time to file pleadings required by the Court's Show Cause Order of June 3, 1999 (lkn) (Entered: 06/30/1999)
226 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting joint motion to extend time until 08/02/99 to file pleadings required by the Court's Show Cause Order of June 3, 1999 [225-1] by DC; plaintiffs' response to motion(s) due by 8/23/99 ; defendant's reply to motion(s) due by 9/7/99 ; (N) (gew) (Entered: 07/02/1999)
228 RESPONSE to order directing the defendant DC to show cause why it should not be bound by this Court's 11/12/91 memorandum opinion and order and that order should not be vacated due 6/30/99 [224-1] (lkn) (Entered: 07/14/1999)
227 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC by Richard Stuart Love (lkn) (Entered: 07/13/1999)
229 RESPONSE by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC, plaintiff ERNEST WILLIAM DEGRAFFIN, plaintiff EDWARD GREEN, plaintiff TYRON T. ALSTON to order directing the defendant DC to show cause why it should not be bound by this Court's 11/12/91 memorandum opinion and order and that order should not be vacated due 6/30/99 [224-1], order any response to defendant DC's filing to show cause due 7/15/99; [224-2], order any reply brief due 7/30/99 ; [224-3], order [224-4]; Attachments. (lkn) (Entered: 08/03/1999)
230 MOTION filed by non-party Michael T. Watkins for relief from defendants' violation of Court Order dated November 12, 1991 (fiat) J. Hogan (lkn) (Entered: 09/15/1999)
231 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : directing that the Show Cause Order of June 3, 1999 be vacated and this matter is dismissed with prejudice; directing that this order be sent to those inmate complainants identified in this order. (N) (gew) (Entered: 09/30/1999)
233 MOTION filed by plaintiff JIBRIL L. IBRAHIM for order to show cause (fiat, motion denied) J. Hogan (lkn) (Entered: 10/14/1999)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 26 of 27

10/13/1999 10/19/1999
11/10/1999 11/15/1999 11/22/1999 11/29/1999 12/15/1999
12/28/1999 02/18/2000 03/01/2000 07/25/2000 09/29/2000 10/02/2000

232 MOTION (CONSENT) filed by plaintiff to extend time to 11/30/99 to file attorney's fees petition or an order resolving the issues of fees (tb) (Entered: 10/14/1999)
234 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion to extend time to 11/30/99 to file attorney's fees petition or an order resolving the issues of fees [232-1] by plaintiffs; motion or order resolving the issues of fees due by 11/30/99 (N) (jaw) (Entered: 10/19/1999)
235 NOTICE OF APPEAL by plaintiff WILBUR E. COOK from order [2311] , entered on: 09/30/99; fee not paid. Copies mailed to parties/counsel. (lkn) (Entered: 11/15/1999)
TRANSMITTED PRELIMINARY RECORD on appeal [235-1] by WILBUR E. COOK to U.S. Court of Appeals (lkn) (Entered: 11/15/1999)
USCA # 99-7245 assigned for appeal [235-1] by WILBUR E. COOK (jf) (Entered: 11/30/1999)
236 MOTION filed by defendant WALTER B. RIDLEY, defendant DC for adoption of consent order regarding attorneys' fees (lkn) (Entered: 11/30/1999)
237 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : granting motion for adoption of consent order regarding attorneys' fees [236-1] by DC, WALTER B. RIDLEY; directing D.C. to pay D.C. Prisoners' Legal Services Project, Inc. the sum of $6,923.19 in complete settlement of all of pltfs.' claim for fees and costs associated with this civil action. (N) (mlp) (Entered: 12/16/1999)
238 MOTION filed by plaintiff WILBUR E. COOK to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis ; Attachments. (tth) Modified on 03/01/2000 (Entered: 01/05/2000)
ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan granting motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis [238-1] by WILBUR E. COOK (fiat) (N) (tth) Modified on 03/01/2000 (Entered: 03/01/2000)
TRANSMITTED supplemental record on appeal [235-1] by WILBUR E. COOK USCA No.: 99-7245. (tth) (Entered: 03/01/2000)
239 MOTION filed for MORRIS J. WARREN to intervene , or for preliminary injunction , or for temporary restraining order , and for enforcement of judgement (bjsp) (Entered: 08/01/2000)
240 MOTION filed by WILL 3X ANDERSON to reinstate case upon contempt of Court and non-compliance to orders ; (fiat) HOGAN, J. (cjp) (Entered: 10/02/2000)
241 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : denying motion to reinstate case upon contempt of Court and non-compliance to orders [240-1] (N) (gew) (Entered: 10/02/2000)

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

District of Columbia live database - Docket Report

Page 27 of 27

11/17/2000
12/14/2000 12/18/2000 12/29/2000 02/20/2001 08/06/2001

242 ORDER by Judge Thomas F. Hogan : denying Wilbur Cook's pro se Motion to Compel; directing the Clerk of the Court to refuse any new pleadings in this action until the case in the U. S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is resolved. (N) (gew) (Entered: 11/20/2000)
243 NOTICE OF APPEAL by plaintiff WILBUR E. COOK from order [2421], entered on: 11/20/00. NO FEES PAID. Copies mailed to all parties; Attachment (1). (tth) Modified on 12/18/2000 (Entered: 12/18/2000)
TRANSMITTED PRELIMINARY RECORD on appeal [243-1] by WILBUR E. COOK to U.S. Court of Appeals (tth) (Entered: 12/18/2000)
USCA # 00-7292 assigned for appeal [243-1] by WILBUR E. COOK (tth) (Entered: 01/02/2001)
244 CERTIFIED COPY of order filed in USCA dated 11/13/00, on appeal [235-1] , affirming the judgment of USDC . USCA # 99-7245 (cjp) (Entered: 02/22/2001)
245 CERTIFIED COPY of order filed in USCA dated 5/30/01, on appeal [243-1] , affirming the judgment of USDC . USCA # 00-7292 (cjp) (Entered: 08/07/2001)

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt

10/25/2005 15:35:58

PACER Login: hs0328

Client Code:

Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 1:90-cv-00793-TFH

Billable Pages: 15

Cost:

1.20

https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?976787101335203-L_923_0-1

10/25/2005

 
 Green v. District of Columbia, Not Reported in F.3d (2001)

2001 WL 674621 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia
Circuit.
Edward GREEN, et al., Appellees Wilbur E. COOK, Appellant v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and Walter B. Ridley, Director, D.C. Department of Corrections, Appellees
No. 00-7292. | May 30, 2001.
BEFORE: WILLIAMS, RANDOLPH, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Opinion
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
*1 Upon consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel, the motion for summary affirmance and supplement thereto, the response to the motion for summary affirmance, the motion for summary reversal, the motion for sanctions and supplement thereto, the response to the motion for sanctions, and the second motion for sanctions, it is
ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be

denied. With the exception of defendants appealing or defending in criminal cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated sufficient likelihood of success on the merits. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for sanctions be denied. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The merits of the parties’ positions are so clear as to warrant summary action. See Taxpayers Watchdog, Inc. v. Stanley, 819 F.2d 294, 297 (D.C.Cir.1987) (per curiam ); Walker v. Washington, 627 F.2d 541, 545 (D.C.Cir.) (per curiam ), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 994 (1980).
In November 2000, this court affirmed the vacatur of the injunction at issue in this appeal. The law-of-the-case doctrine provides that, absent extraordinary circumstances, “decisions [made] in the first appeal should not be revisited on later trips to the appellate court.” LaShawn A. v. Barry, 87 F.3d 1389, 1393 (D.C.Cir.1996) (en banc) (internal quotations omitted). Because appellant has not shown any extraordinary circumstances that would justify revisiting the vacatur of the injunction, we affirm the denial of his motion to compel enforcement of the injunction.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
	  

1

 
 Green v. District of Columbia, Not Reported in F.3d (2000)

2000 WL 1838751 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia
Circuit.
Edward GREEN, et al., Appellees Wilbur E. COOK, Appellant v.
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and Walter B. Ridley, Director, D.C. Dept. of Corrections, Appellees
No. 99-7245. | Nov. 13, 2000.
BEFORE: WILLIAMS, GINSBURG, and TATEL, Circuit Judges.
Opinion
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
*1 Upon consideration of the motion for appointment of counsel, the motions for access to law library and the supplements thereto, the motion for summary affirmance, the Clerk’s order to show cause filed May 9, 2000, the opposition to the motion for summary affirmance filed in response to the order to show cause, the motion for summary reversal, and the supplement thereto, it is

ORDERED that the order to show cause be discharged. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for appointment of counsel be denied. With the exception of defendants appealing or defending in criminal cases, appellants are not entitled to appointment of counsel when they have not demonstrated any likelihood of success on the merits. See D.C. Circuit Handbook of Practice and Internal Procedures 25 (2000). It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for access to law library be denied, because appellant’s filings indicate that he has access to the library. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion for summary reversal be denied and that the motion for summary affirmance be granted. The district court properly dismissed the action on the parties’ joint motion in light of Lewis v. Casey, 518 U.S. 343, 116 S.Ct. 2174, 135 L.Ed.2d 606 (1996), the limitations on prospective relief contained in the Prison Litigation Reform Act, see 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(2), and the settlement agreement between the parties.
The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
	  

1