n," . . n 1;:" Ii' (',:-

ii,

'""~

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOiS' SC') -:3

WESTERN DIVISION

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
v.
THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY Defendant.

)

)

)

)

03C50344

)

)

Civil Action No.

)

)

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

)

)

COMPLAINT NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII"), and Title I ofthe Civil Rights Act of1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a, to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex and to provide appropriate relief to Courtney Moore who was adversely affected by such practices. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleges that the defendant, The Sherwin-Williams Company, discriminated against Ms. Moore on the basis of her sex by permitting sexual harassment of her assistant manager, practices made unlawful under Title VIr. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Iurisdictionofthis Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§45l, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 706(f)(1) and (3) ofTitle VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a.
1

o
2. The unlawful acts alleged below were committed within the jurisdiction ofthe United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.
PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or EEOC), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title VII and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Sections 706(f)(1) and (3) ofTitle VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5(f)(l) and (3). 4. At all relevant times, defendant The Sherwin-Williams Company, has continuously been a corporation doing business in the State ofIllinois, County ofWhiteside, and has continuously had at least fifteen (15) employees. 5. At all relevant times, defendant has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 70l(b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-5(b), (g) and (h).
STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 6. More than thirty (30) days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Courtney Moore filed charges of discrimination with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by defendant. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 7. Pursuant to 42 U. S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1 ), EEOC's representatives attempted to eliminate the unlawful employment practices alleged below and to effect voluntary compliance with Title VII prior to institution ofthe lawsuit but EEOC was unable to secure a conciliation agreement acceptable to the Commission. 8. From at least November 2001, defendant has engaged in unlawful employment
2

practices in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). These practices include, but are not limited to, harassing Ms. Moore on the basis of her gender and permitting the harassment to go unaddressed.
9. The effect ofthe practices complained ofabove has been to deprive Courtney Moore ofequal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect her status as an employee because of her sex.
10. The unlawful employment practices complained ofin paragraphs 8 and 9 above were intentional.
10. The unlawful employment practices complained ofin paragraphs 8 and 9 above were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Courtney Moore.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining defendant, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with defendant, from engaging in any employment practices which discriminate on the basis of sex; B. Order defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for its employees regardless ofsex and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful practices; C. Order defendant to make whole Courtney Moore by providing appropriate relief, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of the unlawful employment practices; D. Order defendant to make whole Courtney Moore by providing compensation for past
3

and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs 8 and 9 above, in amounts to be determined at trial;
E. Order defendant to make whole Courtney Moore and a class offemale employees by providing compensation for past and future non-pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs 8 and 9 above, including emotional pain, humiliation, and inconvenience, in amounts to be determined at trial;
F. Order defendant to pay punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct described in paragraphs 8 and 9 above, in amounts to be determined at trial;
G. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest; and
H. Award the Commission its costs in this action. JURY TRIAL DEMAND
The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its Complaint.
4

o
Respectfully submitted, Eric S. Dreiband General Counsel James Lee Deputy General Counsel Gwendolyn Young Reams Associate General Counsel EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION 1801 "L" Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20507
Noelle C. Brennan Supervisory Trial Attorney
rizek Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION 500 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312) 886-9078
5

Civil Cover Sheet

o
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

Page 1 of2

Civil Cover Sheet U. S. Ui:jH,!Cf COURT
This automated IS-44 conforms generally to the manual IS-44 approved by the Iudicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. The data is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. The information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law. This form is authorized for use Q!!Jx in the Northern District of Illinois.

Plaintiff(s): U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Defendant(s):The Sherwin-Williams Company

County of Residence:

County of Residence: Whiteside

Plaintiff's Atty:

Richard J. Mrizek

Defendant's Atty:

Equal Employment Opportunity

Commission

500 W. Madison Street, Suite

2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661

(312) 886-9078

03C50344

II. Basis of Jurisdiction:

1. U.S. Gov't Plaintiff

III. Citizenshij:l of Princij:lal Parties (Diversity Cases Only)
Plaintiff:- N/A Defendant:- N/A

IV. Origin:

1. Original Proceeding

V. Nature of Suit:

442 Employment

VI.Cause of Action:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §

2000e et seq. ("Title VII"), and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of

1991,42 U.S.C. § 1981a, to correct unlawful employment practices

on the basis of sex.

VII. Reguested in Comj:llaint

Class Action: No

Dollar Demand:

Jury Demand: Yes

VIILThis case IS NOT a refiling of a previously dismissed case.

Date: http://www.ilnd.uscourts.govIPUBLIClForms/autojs44.cfm

9/2/03

"

Civil Cover Sheet

o

Page 2 of2

If any of this information is incorrect, please go back to the Civil Cover Sheet Input form using the Back button in your browser and change it.

Once correct, print this form, sign and date it and submit it with your new civil action. Note: You may need to adjust the font size

in your browser display to make the form print properly.

Revised: 06128/00

http://www.ilnd.usconrts.gov/PUBLIClForms/autojs44.cfin

9/2/03

In the Matter of

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
WESTERN DIVISION

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission,

v.

Plaintiff,

The Sherwin-Williams Company

Defendant.

Case Number:

APPEARANCES ARE HEREBY FILED BY THE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY(S) FOR: U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff

b l . //f/Vt. .....--.,./)

(A)

SIGNATURE

NAME
Richard'J. Mrizek FIRM Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

(B)
SIGrt~)J{ i'YlU1A
NAME
Noelle C. Brennan
FIRM Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

STREET ADDRESS 500 W. Madison St., Suite 2800

STREET ADDRESS 500 W. Madison St., Suite 2800

ClTY/STA TEIZIP

I Chicago, Illinois 60661

TELEPHONE NUMBER

FAX NUMBER

(312) 886-9078

(312) 353-8555

E-MAlLADDRESS R'ICh ard.Mn'zek@eeoc.gov

IOENTIFICATION NUMBER (SEE ITEM 4 ON REVERSE)
ARDC No. 06237730

MEMBER OF TRIAL BAR?

D YES

NO

~

CITY/STATEIZIP

I Chicago, Illinois 60661

TELEPHONE NUMBER

FAX NUMBER

(312) 353-7582

(312) 353-8555

E-MAIL ADDRESS
Noelle.Brennan@eeoc.gov

IDENTIFICATiON NUMBER (SEE ITEM 4 ON REVERSE)
ARDC No. 06228901

MEMBER OF TRIAL BAR?

YES

D NO ~

TRIAL ATIORNEY?

YES [!j

NO

D

TRIAL ATTORNEY?

YES

[!j NO D

/\ ~ 11 ,

,

~ J'/ / /(fJ Sf

If

/IVL//A /< NjSIGNATU~ /...1

~I((A&/

'" '" I

J;0hr C~ Hficffickson

fiRM Equ I Employment Opportunity Commission

STREET ADDRESS
500 W. Madison St., Suite 2800

'\...,,"'TAT7 Chl'cago, Ilml"O'lS 60661

TELEPHONE NUMBER

I FAX NUMBER

(312) 353-8551

(312) 353-8555

DESIGNATED AS LOCAL COUNSEL?
./
~
NAME FIRM
STREET ADDRESS ClTY/STATEJZIP TELEPHONE NUMBER

YES

D NO D

(D)

....1"'(\
,\\\\~~~J t,~s
''.:.,;..0.. (\ :,ltJtJ'?J
I FAX NUMBER

E-MAIL ADDRESS

•

John.Hendnckson@eeoc.gov

E-MAIL ADDRESS

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (SEE ITEM 4 QNREVERSE)
ARDC No. 01187589

MEMBER OF TRIAL BAR?

YES

~

NO

D

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (SEE ITEM 4 ON REVERSE} MEMBER OF TRIAL BAR?

-
YES

D NO D

TRIAL ATTORNEY?

YES

~

NO

D

TRIAL AITORNEY?

YES

D NO D

DESIGNATED AS LOCAL COUNSEL?

D YES

NO

D

DESIGNATED AS LOCAL COUNSEL?

YES

D NO D

 
 .
•
F I LED

SEP 1 0 Z003

IN THE UNITED FOR THE NORTH

STATES ERN DIS

DISTR TRICT

IOCFTICLOLUI~RlPTlH~ISLTAlTEPSGD. ISTRRIECTINCHOAURRTD

WESTERN DIVISION

U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

)

COMMISSION,

)

)

Plaintiff,

)

)

v.

)

)

THE SHERWIN-WILLIAMS COMPANY

)

)

Defendant.

)

--------------------------------)

CONSENT DECREE

DOCKETED
SEP 102003
Civil Action No. 03-CV-50344
Judge Reinhard Magistrate Judge Mahoney

THE LITIGATION

1. PlaintiffEqual Employment Opportunity Commission (the "EEOC") filed this action

alleging that in 200 1and 2002, Defendant, The Sherwin-Williams Company ("Defendant"), violated

Section 703(a) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. §

2000e-2(a), by discriminating against a female employee Courtney Moore ("Moore") on the basis

of sex. Specifically, the EEOC alleged that Defendant violated Title VII by fostering or tolerating

a working environment that was sexually hostile to Moore. Defendant denies these allegations.

2. In the interest ofexpeditiously resolving all disputed issues and avoiding further legal

costs and litigation, and as a result ofhaving engaged in comprehensive settlement negotiations, the

parties have agreed that this action should be finally resolved by entry of this Consent Decree

(hereafter "Decree"). This Decree fully and finally resolves any and all issues and claims arising out

of the Complaint filed by the EEOC in this action. Nothing in this Decree should be construed as

an admission by any party regarding the claims or defenses of the other.

FINDINGS 3. Having carefully examined the terms and provisions ofthis Decree, and based on the pleadings, record, and stipulations of the parties, the Court finds the following:
a. This Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter of this action and of the parties.
b. The terms of this Decree are adequate, fair, reasonable, equitable, and just. The rights of the parties and the public interest are adequately protected by this Decree.
c. This Decree conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Title VII and is not in derogation of the rights or privileges of any person. The entry of this Decree will further the objectives of Title VII and will be in the best interests of the parties, Moore, and the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT: NON-DISCRIMINATION
4. Defendant, its officers, agents (including management personnel), successors, and assigns shall not discriminate against its employees on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII.
NON-RETALIATION 5. Defendant, its officers, agents, employees, successors, assigns and all persons acting in concert with it shall not engage in any form of retaliation against any person who is currently or has previously been employed by it because such person has opposed any practice made unlawful under Title VII, filed a Charge of Discrimination under Title VII, testified or participated in any marmer in any investigation, proceeding, or hearing under Title VII, or asserted any rights under this
-2-

Decree. Nothing in this paragraph shall be construed as limiting any obligations regarding retaliation generally imposed upon Defendant by Title VII.
MONETARY RELIEF 6. Defendant shall pay the gross sum of thirty-five thousand dollars ($35,000), to Courtney Moore within ten (10) business days ofreceiving a release, attached as Exhibit A, signed by Moore. This sum is solely for alleged non-pecuniary harm of emotional pain and humiliation. Defendant shall send a check directly to Moore by certified mail. Defendant shall also mail a copy of this check to the EEOC within five (5) business days of sending the check to Moore. Defendant shall issue a 1099 federal tax form for the payment made by Defendant to Moore.
NOTICE 7. Within ten (10) days after the receipt ofthe Court's entry ofthis Consent Decree and for the duration of this Decree, Defendant shall continuously post the notice attached hereto as Exhibit A at its Sterling, Illinois store in prominent locations frequented by Defendant's employees. Within ten (10) days after receipt of the entered Consent Decree, Defendant shall certify in writing to the Chicago District Office of the EEOC that the Notice has been posted, and shall inform the EEOC of the location where it has been posted.
RECORD KEEPING 8. For a period oftwo (2) years following entry ofthis Decree, Defendant shall maintain and make available for inspection and copying by the EEOC records of each complaint of sex harassment made by one ofits employees from Defendant's retail stores within the Madison District of Defendant's Midwest Division. Such report shall indicate the date the complaint was made, who
-3-

made it, what was alleged, and what actions the Defendant took to resolve the matter. 9. Defendant shall make all documents or records referred to in Paragraph 8, above,
available for inspection and copying within ten (10) business days after the EEOC so requests. In addition, Defendant shall make available for interview all persons within its employ whom the EEOC reasonably requests for purposes of verifying compliance with this Decree and shall perm.:t a representative of the EEOC to enter Defendant's premises for such purposes on ten (10) business days advance notice by the EEOC.
10. Nothing contained in this Decree shall be construed to limit any obligation Defendant may otherwise have to maintain records under Title VII or any other law or regulation.
TRAINING 11. Defendant shall provide sexual harassment training to all employees who work at its Sterling, Illinois store by trainers chosen by Defendant with approval by the EEOC. This training shall be completed within six months ofentry ofthis Decree, unless the parties agree to a reasonable extension. This training shall encompass the requirements of Title VII pertaining to sexual harassment. Within ten (10) days after the completion ofthe training described above, Defendant will certify to EEOC that the training has been completed, the name(s) ofthe person(s) conducting the training, the time(s), duration and date(s) the training was held and a list identifying by ':!ame and position all individuals who received the training.
-4-

REPORTING 12. Defendant shall furnish to the EEOC the following written reports semi-annually for a period oftwo (2) years following entry ofthis Decree. The first report shall be due six (6) months after entry of the Decree. The final report shall be due twenty-four (24) months after entry of the Decree. Each such report shall contain a summary of the information recorded by Defendant pursuant to Paragraph 8, including the name ofthe complainant, the allegation ofthe complaint and the action taken by Defendant in response. 13. When this Decree requires the submission by Defendant of reports, certifications, notices, or other materials to the EEOC, they shall be mailed to: RichardJ. Mrizek,Trial Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, Illinois, 60661.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION 14. In the event that either party to this Decree believes that the other party has failed to comply with any provision(s) ofthe Decree, the complaining party shall notifY the other party ofthe alleged non-compliance within ninety (90) days ofthe alleged non-compliance and shall afford the alleged non-complying party twenty (20) business days to remedy the non-compliance or to satisfY the complaining party that the alleged non-complying party has complied or that no non-compliance has occurred. If the alleged non-complying party has not remedied the alleged non-compliance or satisfied the complaining party that it has complied within twenty (20) business days, the complaining party may apply to the Court for appropriate relief. The party alleging non-compliance must act in good faith in both its allegation of non-compliance and the absence of appropriate remedial measures.
-5-

DURATION OF THE DECREE AND RETENTION OF JURISDICTION 15. All provisions ofthis Decree shall be in effect (and the Court will retain jurisdiction of this matter to enforce this Decree) for a period of two (2) years immediately following entry of the Decree, provided, however, that if, at the end of the two (2) years period, any dispute(s) under Paragraph 13, above, remain unresolved, the term of the Decree shall be automatically extended (solely regarding such unresolved dispute(s) and the Court will retain jurisdiction ofthis matter to enforce the Decree) until such time as any such dispute(s) has been resolved.
-6-

ENTERED AND APPROVED FOR:
For the EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 L Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20507
ERIC S. DREIBAND General Counsel
JAMES LEE Deputy General Counsel
GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

For The Sherwin-Williams Company 101 Prospect Street 12th Floor, Midland Cleveland, Ohio 44115

NOELLE BRENNAN Supervisory Trial Attorney
tJ£~
Trial Attorney
DATE: _..::....:SE=P_1_0--=2~OO:...:.3_

I ENTER:

~

!

The Honorable Philip G. Reinhard

United States District Judge

-7-

EXHIBIT A
RELEASE AGREEMENT I, Courtney Moore, for and in consideration of the sum of$35,000, payable to me pursuant to the terms of the Consent Decree entered by the Court in EEOC v. Sherwin-Williams., on behalf ofmyself, my heirs, assigns, executors, and agents, do hereby forever release, waive, remise, acquit, and discharge Sherwin-Williams, and all past and present shareholders, officers, agents, employees, and representatives, as well as all successors and assigns, from any and all claims and causes of action of any kind which I now have or ever have had under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e etseq., or 42 U.S.C. § 1981A as a result ofar arising from the subject matter and claims which were or which could have been asserted in EEOC v. SherwinWilliams., No. _ _ _(N.D. Ill.) or in EEOC charge No. 210A20330.

Date

Courtney Moore

-8-

EXHIBITB

NOTICE TO ALL SHERWIN-WILLIAMS EMPLOYEES

This Notice is being posted pursuant to a Consent Decree entered by the federal court in EEOC v. The Sherwin-Williams Company, resolving a lawsuit filed by the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") against The Sherwin-Williams Company. ("Sherwin-Williams")

In its suit, the EEOC alleged that Sherwin-Williams fostered or tolerated a working environment that was sexually hostile toward one of its female employees, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"). Sherwin-Williams denies these allegations. In order to resolve this case, Sherwin-Williams and the EEOC agreed to the entry of a Consent Decree which provided, among other things, that:

1) Sherwin-Williams will pay monetary relief to a former employee;

2) Sherwin-Williams will not discriminate on the basis of sex;

3) Sherwin-Williams will not retaliate against any person because she opposed any practice made unlawful by Title VII, filed a Title VII charge of discrimination, participated in any Title VII proceeding, or asserted any rights under the Consent Decree; and

4) Sherwin-Williams will train its employees with respect to sexual harassment.

The EEOC enforces the federal laws against discrimination in employment on the basis ofrace, color, religion, national origin, sex, age or disability. If you believe you have been discriminated against, you may contact the EEOC at (312) 353-8195. The EEOC charges no fees and has employees who speak languages other than English. If you believe you have been discriminated against you may contact the EEOC.

THIS IS AN OFFICIAL NOTICE AND MUST NOT BE DEFACED

This Notice must remain posted for two years from the date below and must

not be altered, defaced or covered by any other material. Any questions

about this Notice or compliance with its terms may be directed to: EEOC

500 West Madison Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, Illinois 60661.

SEP 102003

;r~b; l2eNk-Lo...--L

Date

ThlHOnorable Philip G. Reinhard

District Judge

-9-

 
 CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 - U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois - Docket Report

Page 1 of 2

MAHONEY, TERMED
United States District Court Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 (Rockford)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:03-cv-50344

EEOC v. Sherwin-Williams Co Assigned to: Honorable Philip G. Reinhard Demand: $0 Cause: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Date Filed: 09/03/2003 Date Terminated: 09/10/2003 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Plaintiff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by Richard John Mrizek U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 W. Madison Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 886-9078 Fax: (312) 353-8555 Email: richard.mrizek@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

John C. Hendrickson United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 353-8551 Fax: (312) 353-8555 Email: john.hendrickson@eeoc.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Noelle Christine Brennan Brennan & Monte, Ltd. 20 South Clark Street Suite 1530 Chicago, IL 60603 (312) 422-0001 Email: nbrennan@brennan-monte.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant

https://ecf.ilnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?517088585146576-L_353_0-1

5/22/2007

CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 - U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois - Docket Report

Page 2 of 2

Sherwin-Williams Company

Date Filed 09/03/2003
09/03/2003 09/09/2003 09/10/2003
09/10/2003

#

Docket Text

1 COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of John C. Hendrickson, Noelle Christine Brennan, Richard John Mrizek as attorney(s) for plaintiff ( 0 summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (clb) (Entered: 09/03/2003)

THIS matter is referred to the Hon. P. Michael Mahoney pursuant to Internal Operating Procedure 11(d). (clb) (Entered: 09/03/2003)

2 JOINT MOTION by EEOC, Sherwin-Williams Co for entry of consent decree ; Notice of filing (jmm (Entered: 09/10/2003)

3 MINUTE ORDER of 9/10/03 by Hon. Philip G. Reinhard : Parties' joint motion for entry of consent decree is granted [2-1]. Enter consent decree. This case is dismissed. Any pending motions are now moot. terminating case Mailed notice (jmm (Entered: 09/10/2003)

4 CONSENT DECREE (jmm (Entered: 09/10/2003)

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt

PACER Login: Description: Billable Pages:

05/22/2007 15:23:19

hs0328

Client Code:

Docket Report Search Criteria:

1

Cost:

EEOC 3:03-cv-50344 0.08

https://ecf.ilnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?517088585146576-L_353_0-1

5/22/2007