UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

ORIGINAL

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,

JUDGE : Friedman, a~rnard A. DECK : S. Division Civil Deck DATE : 09/28/2004 @ 13:32:34 CASE NUl!BER : 2: 04CVi3795 clIP EEOC V. PIIIlIACLE AIRLINES
IlfC IDA)

v.
PINNACLE AIRLINES, INC.

'MAGTSTRATE J1JDGE 'I'EPE
COMPLAINT AND JURY TRIAL DeMAND

____________ Defendant. ~------------I

NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action underTitie VII ofthe Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 'Iltle I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex, and to provide appropriate relief to former employee Amanda Hurst, who was adversely affecled by such practices. The Commission alleges that Defendant, Pinnacle Airlines, Inc., ("Defendant") subjected Hurst to a sexually hostile work environment and retaliated against her by terminating her employment for complaining of the harassing conduct.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
1. Jurisdiction ofthis Court is invoked pursuantto 28 U.S.C. §§ 451,1331,1337,
1343, and 1345. "fhis action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 706(f)(1) and (3) ofTitle VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) ("Title VII") , and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 a.
2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the

jurisdiction of the United States District Court forthe Eastern District of Michigan, Southern

Division.

PARTIES

3. Plaintiff. the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission").

is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration,

interpretation, and enforcement ofTitle VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action

by Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2DOOe-5(f)(1) and (3).

4. At all relevant times, Defendant, Pinnacle Airlines. Inc., has continuously

conducted business In the State of Tennessee, City of Memphis and Kalama;::oo, Michigan

and has continuously had at least 15 employees.

5, At all relevanttimes. Defendant Employer has continuously been an employer

engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701 (b), (g), and

(h) of Title Vii, 42 U,S.C. §§ 2000e(b), (g), and (h).

&!ONCILIATIOt!

6. Prior to the institution of this lawsuit, the Commission's representatives

attempted to eliminate the unlawful employment practices alleged and to effect voluntary

compliance with Title VII through informal methods of conciliation, conference, and

persuasion within the meaning of Section 706 (b) otTilie VII, 42 U.S.C. Section 2000e-5(b),

STATEMENT OF CLAIMS

7.

More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Amanda Hurst

("Hurst") tiled a charge with the Commission alleging Violations of Title VII by Defendant

Employer. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled.

2

Since at least November 2002, Defendant Employer has engaged in unlawful employment practices at its Memphis, Tennessee site in violation of Section 703(a) and
704(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C, § 2000e-2(a), 3(a). The Defendant's unlawful employment
practices Included a physical sexual assault on Hurst by her supervisor, a male flight captain, in Kalamazoo, Michigan.
9. Hurst complained about the assault and advised Respondent she could not work with her harasser. Respondent made no assurance she would not be assigned to work with her harasser.
10. Respondent also retaliated against Hurst because she complained about ssx harassment. Hurst was forced to take a medial leave at reduced pay in order to avoid contact with her harasser. It also refused to allow herto return to work part-time. Hurst was
only able to return to work when her harasser's employment ended following a nolo contendre plea to the criminal sexual assault complaint.
11. The effect of the unlawful conduct complained of in paragraphs 8, 9 and 10 above, has been to deprive Hurst of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely to affect her status as an employee because of her sex, female.
12. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 8 through 10 above Were intentional.
13. As the result of the unlawful employment practices, Hurst has suffered emotional distress, embarrassment, humiliation, and inconvenience.
14. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraphs 8 through 10 above were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Hurst.
3

E86YER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Employer, its officers. successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with It, from engaging in sexual harassment and any other employment practice which discriminates on the basis of sex.
B. Order Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies. practices, and
programs which provide equal employment opportunities for women, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.
C. Orderthe Defendant Employerto make whole Hurst, by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its urllawful employment practices.
D. Order Deferldant Employer to make whole Hurst, by providing compensation
for past pecurliary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraphs 8 through 10 above in amounts to be proven at trial.
E. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Hurst by providing compensation for past nonpecuniary losses resulting from. the unlawful practices complained of in paragraphs 8 through 10 above in amounts to be proven at trial.
F. Order Defendant Employer to pay Hurst punitive damages for its malicious or
reckless conduct described in paragraphs 8 through 10 above. In amounts to be proven at trial.
G. Order Defendant Employer to provide training to Its owners and employees regarding the prohibitions of Title VII, including sexual harassment.
4

Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the pubUc InIerest.

I. Award the Commission its costs of this action.

JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by Its complaint.

DATED: September 28,2004

Respectfully submitted,
ERIC S. DREIBAND General Counsel
JAMES N. LEE Deputy General Counsel
ADEL~ E RAPPO~R~/44h83&3A)
Regional Attorney

ROBERT K. DAWKINS (P38289) Supervisory Trial Attorney
TRINA MENGESHA (P59458) Trial Attorney

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
DETROIT DISTRICT OFFICE Patrick V. McNamara Building 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865 Detroit, Michigan 48226 Telephone: (313)226-3407

5

CIVIL COVER SHEET COUNTY IN W/lICH TillS ACTION AROSE, KALAMAZOO

I'Utl5 IAu The JS~4
by I$w, ex

eMl cept

cOlier Sohoot ond BG provided by

ltonceolnl frourlmosauotcn~CltoUtn1.talTnheids

tlar.l" neither replaeD nor &upplament the fllil'lg form, I'Ipprovad by the JudicIal Contoronae 0'

and the

U sa~1cfe,o.ttepale.aldnin5 gs o~ r othn or p1appiotr.s

AS

U LJ: . . . , U , V for l.I$~ of tho Clerk of Court tar th~ purpoc:mQ or InlUatlng th~ civil dockot shoet.

I: Cal PLAINTIFFS

DEFENDANTS

U.s. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

PINNACLE AlRLlNIlS. INC.

(b) Oounly of Rosldanc. of Flrsl U.IOd

county of Rosldenc. of PI.., U.,ad KALAMAZOO

Rk<!<:fs"t::

NOT~: IN,~e,;,~~~~"'NATION CASES. USE THE ~OCATION OF THE

(0) Attornay'$ (Flon Nomo, AddrQSA. Qnd TelephQnQ Number)
Trina Mcngcsha (P594SS), Equal Employmont Opportlmity Commission. 477 Michigan Avenue, Room

ArtomOY"""SER~ARQ~~O~N
: "'MAGISTRA'fl3 . E IE

R6S.Dctroit. Ml 4R226 (313) 226-4620

II, BASIS OF JURISDICTION (PI."''' 'X"lnoooe"" Onlyl

[gil .S. Government
P'.'nilit
o 2 U.S. (lovommonl Oo'o0<4nl

o 3F~d.ra' Qu••Uon (U.S. GovlIrllmanl No. a Party)
o 4 OIV.,,'ly (Indicate CltlzonShlp ot PQ~les .'I'MIII)

III. CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAl. PARTIES (P~" ....X" In 0.. s., 1.,PI,'n'II

t", (Fo< Ol"",,"y c.... Onlyl PLA

cep

and One 8m: ceral'l4c1nl} PLA OEF

0 04 CItizen of Thll State

In,.rpcrol.d or pnn,'p.' Plac. 4

0 ' 0 ' 01 Busln... In Tnl. Sial.

0 0 0 05 Cltlzon of Al'1Olhttr

2 2 In,orpc",.d and Pr'ncip"

5

of 6\1illleil In Aoothor St.te

CII~,~,~~~!(~:~ol. 0 3 03 Forotgn Natlon

Os De

IV. NATURE OF SUIT

(PI~C() tin ~'X+llr'l One SOl( OnM

CONTRACT

'I'OR'rS

FORFh~TURE/PENALTI

MNtallJPTCY

Q 1; ~ 'nwl1IIW

PERSONAL INJURY

PtiRSONAL INJURV I:l 610 AgnCl,llklfll

"'.;l Cl

.Ap~pI2B USC 1GB

CJ 121) M.rl""

C 310MplOfljl

0 lQ2 Perllonfll InJl.Il')I~ 0 020 Ott\rer Food " Cru~

C , lO MiII6r Aet

r::I 3H~A1rplaM.PrOduel

M,d. M.alprae~(:1 t::l 025 OnIo RtlttlMl.Sllzlll'W t::l 04~3 Wtthdrflwel

t:I 140 N8goUabift InllllUmo~

IJ.RWI\y

C U:.() PerOO'IIlIry P1 a-...p..-,m.nl and

[) ;120 M,it.",,11 Llbul

t::l 3<lW~1',~'~f1'

Cl

olPmp.rty ~i: eel 630 UqoOf ~aWII

26 USC HiT

EnitIrtIlIrr'I"nl
or JUdgmenl
C 11'H MedlcatB Atl CJ 152 R&eOIIOIYof Defaulted
Siudant LOMa HE.lQl. V..~qr.n')

And SkorKj.r
0 330 F.dl,,1 ~mplo~trt'
LI'bU'(y
0 340 MiIN1nllt CJ ~45 MlInn. Product

[J 3G8 Alb.loa Pertonll 0

InJu~P"''''' Uabi It)'

0

tl

oPERSONAl. f'fl:OP~RTY

310 Other F....l.ld

CJ

GJlO R.R. '" Truc;k
650 Alliin. R.gl. aGO OtCUpalionst
Snl.lvIH.ollh (JQO OthM

F'R;Q~RTY AIQltnJ
tl 820 Co~ghtl 0 lI30 PalMlI (;) 840 T,adernark

CJ is:} RIIII_'Y~'tMIo'Pt~r'It

Utb41ty

(;II V.tllmn', Genema 0 ;J::;iO MOlar Vehicle

C 311 Truth In l.Ondll'l'jj' Q JOr;) Olhlr PerlONtI

LADOR

IiQQWo 6iCI,jRfTY

I:l 160 Stoekholda...•Sl,IlIi 0 1911 OU'l.r Cottlrrtd [l 195 CCIf'IIrKt Pmdu", LI,bllll~

0 355 M~(Jf VehI.Q/a Pfi)due\ I.lilblllty
I:l 350 Olf\ftr Pillrtonal
I~Jury

ProJ',ltr1)' C.amage C ~85 PIOjMrt~ Clmage
Product Llnblmy

... Cl 11 0 Flit Llbat :!i"'ndl~'
I:l 120 la~/MQmL R.letlOMI

C ;;, H"I' 31S~ LI 8G2 Black t.ung (923) CI 863 D!Wc/o/ww (~OS(QI'

ReAL PROPERTY

CIVIL RIGHTS

PRISONER PETITIONS

LI 864 SSID 11Ue XVI

u" ~t I:l ~1CJ !...~d C"mdemnallon
C ~O F«tJ,lolure I:l :"0 Ftetlll.. £I'~'"""t:

er'l'lPloyment ~3 HQl,.llIIlnll1

[l ,i4lO "rCKlt 10 Lind

McQmmgd.~on.

o 0 240: Tort Produ~ l.tobil~ty

444 Wolfers

0 t~o I.AbIIr.tJIllrl'lL R.po"I~1jI Cl ..~ Rsr('Olloll

C ~1 0 Mgllooa toVacata

.. O~"~"AI:'I

SOI'lI.nee

CJ 740 R_lIway Labor Act

FE.ClI!t~AL TAX SUITS

Hlba.IIII Corl)lA: C S30GanM4!l1 0 !i3~ 0e8~h Plltflall~

CI 700 Oll'Nlr I.iIbo(
LllIgl!lliOn

C 0.70 TDlClI& {U.S. Pllllir'lUU
~ 0tI'8~.1I·1/,)

o 0 2S0,.. Otw R..I Pro~w

""0 Oth.r Clvlll:t:lghtl$ 0 S4G M"l'IiJtfI'II.It & OIlwi' (;] 7111 Empl. RDI. tliC.

C SSIl Clvtl R.lgt\\.II

Sl!l(;lIrlllA!;1

D 871 IRS·Third PB'I~ 26USO 7609

. eox (PLACE AN •X' IN ONt;

C (i~5 Pf~on Oondition
ONLY)

OTHE:R STATUT~S
o 01100 $1&16 R:"PPcu11I,1fJrnlnt
t:l 41 0 AnUlrLl,'
o 430 BalUl.a and Bal'l~n" o 400 Commerce/ICC
[] 480 DapOtlotlOI'l

C 470 ftll:~ltt, IrIfIUtr'IIi4Id"
Cllmlp40"OIII'I"'I.

oD lI10 Sltlfle1hro ::l.tvlcllt eGO SltAI mlluCom I1'IOd IIln,

EM.CI\I~

o 876 CUltOme( Challi3nge

12 L1SC :10410

oCJ 601 Aol'IC;uj.turll Ado. 802 Er:tInamlc~lr.bblzliii.'lrlAcl

I:J BQ:) Efl'l'I!'OIIII"Wnllol ~"",,.
o 094 EMiroy Atkx;ehon Poe1

1:1 8!i;l!s F~dom IJf

lnr~iIIUon AC4

o 000 =·~tr:: Undlti'

/IIoc,,, IE",,,,_

to Jtlldc.

[J 9~O Conlllllutlonal,ly QI
o GtA\c!:I S\('I~l.Ihnli ilQO Olhlnn.tlillpry~on.

App&8110 OJ8tl~t
O 7 JUodf.jO frQm MillJlllrate

AU SE

OF

ACTION

(Olin Il'1e U.$. Civil ~tflMI!II.mdl!lr w~leh V~ 1'1'" IltInD 00 nal elta jLHI$<;Iletion.-l ,\llule, unl4ln dl"'l!Il'&iiV.l

and

wrltotl)ri61' '\Iot.~nt of c.aule.

This i. nn nClion ull~crTillc VIl ofll.e Civil Righls A., of 1964 .n~ Title I oflile Civil Ri~hls Act of 1991 10 eOr","1 unluwful omployment

"rrlj..'i .......~ ~t'I th,... h~,,;"l ~"'I( VII. REQUeSTEO IN

0 CHECK IF THIS IS A CI.A$S ACTION

GCEMANO

CHECK YES onl

COMPLAINT:

UNDER F.R.C.P. 23

JURY O~

I VIII. RELATED CASE(S) In,,",cllonol:
IFANY

Juoce

DOCK~T
NVMDER

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 83.11

,1:

Is this a case that has been previously dismissed?

If yes, give the following information:
Co urt: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Case No.: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ Judge: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

DYes
~~

2.

&0 ) . Other than stated above, are there any pending or previously

discontinued or dismissed companion cases In this or any other

Yes

court, Including stale court? (Companion cases are matters in whi

It appears sUbstantially similar evidence will be offered or the sam

.

or related parties are present and the cases arise out of the same

transaction or occurrence.)

If yes. give the following Information: Court: ________________________

Caso No.: _____________________
Judge: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

Notes:

 
 UNI1ED STATES DISTRICT COUKI
re 0 fl fE rrJ EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
tr IldJ SOUTHERN DIVISION

MAR I a 2005

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintift;

CLERK'S OFFICE
u.s. DISTRICT COURT
Civil Action M,STERN MICHIGAN
04·CV-73795-DT

vs,
PIl\TNACLE AIRLINES, INC.,

HON. FlRRNARD A FRIEDMAN

Defendant

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

~'......'"",'" :,"i), I ',lIo. '/

On 'VI.Meh 3, 201lS, thcparlies in this matter n~ached a settlement agreement, the temlS of which were placed on the record and arc incorporated into this order. Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED that the ~ompJaillt is dismissed with prejudice and without cost~, The court re,erves jurisoictioll for 90 days to enforce the settlement agreement and to lake any other action that may be lleccssMy, as was discussed Oil the record.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the EEOC's motion to unseal the record is deni~d.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the r~cord be unsealed 011 the court's motion, except as to any porlions o[the record which identify the monetary 1~l1ns ofthe parties' seUlcment agreement, which shall remain sealed.

n IS FURTH ER ORDERED that the court's orders requiring tho EEOC chairperson

10 show caLLse why she should not be held in contempt are vacated .

Dated: MAR 102005
Detroit, Michigan

.,~,~

.
(

, ·)'/~-~·ij/)//1\,

~ BERNAR A FRIEDMA

''<-~--­

CI1"ffiF' NITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Copy Mailed This Date To:

Adele Rappurt Steve 1 Weiss Dennis Archer

2

 
 CM/ECF - U.S. District Court:mied - Docket Report

https://ecf.mied.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?687578160632973-L_3...

U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04-cv-73795-BAF-SDP

CLOSED

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Pinnacle Airlines, Incorporated Assigned to: Honorable Bernard A Friedman Referred to: Honorable Steven D Pepe Cause: No cause code entered

Date Filed: 09/28/2004 Date Terminated: 03/10/2005 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by Adele Rapport Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 477 Michigan Avenue Room 865 Detroit, MI 48226 313-226-5670 Email: Adele.Rapport@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Robert K. Dawkins Equal Employment Opportunities Commission 477 Michigan Avenue Suite 865 Detroit, MI 48226 313-226-4600 Fax: 313-226-2778 Email: robert.dawkins@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Trina R. Mengesha Equal Employment Opportunities Commission 477 Michigan Avenue Suite 865 Detroit, MI 48226 313-226-4600 Fax: 313-226-2778 Email: trina.mengesha@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

1 of 4

5/22/2007 2:23 PM

CM/ECF - U.S. District Court:mied - Docket Report

https://ecf.mied.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?687578160632973-L_3...

V. Defendant Pinnacle Airlines, Incorporated
V. Movant Amanda Hurst

represented by Sheryl A. Laughren Dickinson Wright 500 Woodward Avenue Suite 4000 Detroit, MI 48226-3425 313-223-3086 Fax: 313-223-3598 Email: slaughren@dickinsonwright.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Steve J. Weiss Hertz, Schram, (Bloomfield Hills) 1760 S. Telegraph Road Suite 300 Bloomfield Hills, MI 48302-0183 248-335-5000 Email: sweiss@hsspc.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 09/28/2004 11/02/2004 11/15/2004 11/15/2004 11/29/2004

#

Docket Text

11 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) COMPLAINT filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Pinnacle Airlines, Incorporated.(ATee, ) (Entered: 03/21/2005)
12 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) MOTION to Intervene and Request for immediate scheduling of a settlement conference by Amanda Hurst. (ATee, ) (Entered: 03/21/2005)
13 NOTICE of Appearance by Sheryl A. Laughren on behalf of Pinnacle Airlines, Incorporated. (ATee, ) (Entered: 03/21/2005)
14 RESPONSE to 12 MOTION to Intervene filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(Sealed Attachment) (ATee, )Modified on 3/31/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 03/21/2005)
Minute Entry -Settlement Conference held on 11/29/2004 before Honorable Bernard A Friedman. Disposition: held(Court Reporter Joan Morgan) (CMul, ) (Entered: 12/03/2004)

2 of 4

5/22/2007 2:23 PM

CM/ECF - U.S. District Court:mied - Docket Report

https://ecf.mied.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?687578160632973-L_3...

11/30/2004 01/03/2005 01/18/2005 01/19/2005 01/27/2005 01/28/2005 02/01/2005 02/08/2005 02/16/2005 03/03/2005 03/03/2005 03/10/2005 03/31/2005

1 (Unsealed 3/10/05) Order Sealing Case file for 30 days by Judge Friedman.(ATee, ) Modified on 3/21/2005 (ATee, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 3/21/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 12/01/2004)
2 (Unsealed 3/10/05) Notice of Status Conference. Modified on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 01/05/2005)
3 BRIEF in Support re 2 Sealed Matter Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Order filed by Sealed Matter. (O'Neal, Sherry) (Entered: 01/18/2005)
Minute Entry -Settlement Conference held on 1/19/2005 before Honorable Bernard A Friedman. Disposition: held (CMul, ) (Entered: 01/21/2005)
4 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) MOTION for entry of order. (KGeha, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). Modified on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 02/02/2005)
6 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) MOTION to Unseal. (KGeha, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). Modified on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 02/02/2005)
5 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) ORDER denying 4 motion for entry of order. Signed by Honorable Bernard A Friedman. (KGeha, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). Modified on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 02/02/2005)
7 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) Notice of Hearing.(KGeha, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). Modified on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 02/09/2005)
8 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) Order Scheduling Settlement Conference.(KGeha, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). Modified on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 02/18/2005)
Minute Entry -Settlement Conference held on 3/3/2005 before Honorable Bernard A Friedman. Disposition: held(Court Reporter Joan Morgan) (KByrd, ) (Entered: 03/03/2005)
9 (UNSEALED 3/10/05) Order Vacating Order to Show Cause (LHack, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). Modified on 3/22/2005 (ATee, ). (Entered: 03/10/2005)
10 ORDER by Honorable Bernard A Friedman dismissing case with prejudice and unsealing case. (ATee, ) (Entered: 03/21/2005)
15 NOTICE of Correction re 14 Response to Motion. (ATee, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005)

PACER Service Center
Transaction Receipt
05/22/2007 15:21:05

3 of 4

5/22/2007 2:23 PM

CM/ECF - U.S. District Court:mied - Docket Report

https://ecf.mied.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?687578160632973-L_3...

PACER Login:
Description:
Billable Pages:

hs0328
Docket Report
2

Client Code: eeoc

Search Criteria:

2:04-cv-73795-BAF-SDP

Cost:

0.16

4 of 4

5/22/2007 2:23 PM