IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. Defendant.

CIVIL ACTION NO.
COMPLAINT Jury Trial Demand

NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex, and to provide appropriate relief to Julie Eliasen who was adversely affected by such practices. Specifically, Defendant discriminated against Eliasen when it failed to promote her because she is a woman. Defendant’s action violated Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § § 451, 1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(t)(1) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) ("Title VII"). 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were and are now being committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota.

PARTIES 3. The Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 706(f)(1) o f Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3). 4. At all relevant times, Lubrication Technologies, Inc. ("Defendant"), has continuously been a Minnesota corporation doing business in the State of Minnesota and the City of Golden Valley, and has continuously had at least 15 employees. 5. At all relevant times, Lubrication Technologies, Inc. has continuously been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce under Sections 701(b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e (b), (g) and (h).
STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 6. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Eliasen filed a charge with the EEOC alleging violations of Title VII by Defendant. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 7. At all times relevant, Defendant failed to promote Eliasen because of her sex. In particular, Defendant failed to promote Eliasen to a vacant field sales representative position, and instead hired a man for the job. Defendant’s actions were in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a), which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex.

8. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraph 7 above has been to deprive Eliasen of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect her status as an employee because of her sex.
o The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above were intentional.
10. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Eliasen.
PRAYER FOR REMEF Wherefore, the EEOC respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in any employment practice which discriminates on the basis of sex. B. Order Defendant to make whole Eliasen by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices. C. Order Defendant to make whole Eliasen by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above, in amounts to be determined at trial. D. Order Defendant to make whole Eliasen by providing compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful practices complained of in paragraph 7 above, including emotional distress in amounts to be determined at trial.

E. Order Defendant to pay Eliasen punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct, complained of in paragraph 7 above, in amounts to be determined at trial.
Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest.
G. Award the EEOC its costs of this action.
4

JURY TRIAL DEMAND
The EEOC requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its Complaint.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
ERIC S. DREIBAND General Counsel
JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel
GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 1801 "L" Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20507

Dated: Sept. 16, 2004

J NP. KAMP ’Y~ ~eglonal Attorney

Dated:

Senior Trial Attorney
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Minneapolis Area Office 330 South Second Avenue - Suite 430 Minneapolis, MN 55401-2224 (612) 335-4047

 
 Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 1 of 9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, v.
LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 04-4170 (JNE/SRN)

)

)

CONSENT DECREE

)

)

)

This action was filed by the EqualEmployment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") on September

22, 2004, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq.

In its complaint, the EEOC alleged that Defendant failed to promote Julie Eliasen to a vacant field sales

representative position because of her sex, and instead hired a man for the job. The EEOC alleged that

Defendant’s actions were in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2(a), which

prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex.

Defendant denies that it has committed any of the violations alleged by the EEOC. The EEOC and

Defendant (hereinafter referred to as "the parties") have agreed to settle these claims in order to reach an

amicable resolution of this matter and avoid further litigation. The terms of the agreement are set forth

below.

I. Monetary Relief

A. Settlement Amount

Defendant agrees to settle this case for $80,000.00 and to mail checks payable to Julie Eliasen as

described below totaling that amount, less appropriate deductions described below. The checks shall be

sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to Eliasen, and a copy of the checks shall be mailed

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 2 of 9
simultaneously to the undersigned counselfor the EEOC. The payment is payable within 10 calendar days after this action is dismissed pursuant to this Consent Decree.
The parties stipulate that they have allocated the settlement amount into separate payment categories in recognition of the underlying claims. Defendant agrees to pay Eliasen $50,000.00 in back pay, minus standard deductions, and $30,000.00 in compensatory damages. All payments are payable within 10 calendar days after this action is dismissed pursuant to this Consent Decree.
Defendant shall issue Eliasen a W-2 for the $50,000.00 in back pay damages, and a 1099 for the $30,000.00 in compensatory damages. All of the employer’s share of required withholdings, such as Social Security, shall be paid by Defendant. Neither the EEOC nor Defendant make any representation, or assume any responsibility for any tax liability, assessments, interest, penalties and/or costs that Eliasen may or may not incur on such payments under local, state and/or federal law. II. Non-Monetary Terms
A. Compliance with Title VII Defendant will not discriminate on the basis of sex as prohibited by 42 U.S.C. §2000e, et. seq. Defendant will not retaliate against any employee or former employee for exercising the right to oppose any practice made unlawful employment practice by Title VII, and to make a charge, testify, assist, or participate in an investigation, proceeding or hearing under 42 U.S.C. §2000e et. seq. B. Impact Upon the EEOC's Processing The EEOC does not waive or in any manner limit its right to process or seek relief in any other charge or investigation based upon allegations not included in the above-captioned case.
2

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 3 of 9
C. Training Defendant shall provide training, specifically on sex discrimination, to all of its personnel involved in the interviewing, hiring and selection process of employees, including supervisors, managers and administrators. Defendant also agrees that it will continue this training, and in addition, will implement annualEEO training for supervisors, managers and administrators during the period of the Consent Decree. D. Creation and Dissemination of Anti-Discrimination Policy Defendant shall certify to the EEOC that it has an anti-discrimination policy. Such policy will specifically outline procedures for reporting and investigating complaints of sex discrimination, and will include the names of persons to whom discrimination complaints should be made. If no such policy exists, Defendant shall create such a policy within 30 days. This policy shall be disseminated to all employees.
E. Posting of Notice Defendant agrees to post the notice (Exhibit A hereto) in its facility in a clear and conspicuous location customarily used for the posting of employee notices. Defendant agrees to post this notice within five calendar days of approval of this Consent Decree by the Court, for the term of the Consent Decree. F. Record-keeping and Reporting For two years from the date of this Consent Decree, Defendant shall document and maintain records related to every complaint of sex discrimination in hiring and/or promotion. Defendant shall also establish and maintain, segregated apart fromits employment decision-making process, a system of records that contains an applicant flow log indicating the sex of all applicants, whether the individual was interviewed, whether the individual was hired and/or promoted, or the reason for rejection. The
3

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 4 of 9
discrimination complaints and the applicant flow log will be provided to the EEOC every six months throughout the term of this Decree with the first reports being due six months after the Final Order is entered by the Court.
G. EEO-1 Reports Defendant will comply with 29 C.F.R. §1602.7, and file EEO-1 reports for all covered employees. Defendant will certify to the EEOC, by an appropriate official, that the company has complied with this provision. H. Advertising of Jobs Defendant agrees that for vacancies for the field or outside sales representative position during the period of this Decree, if it chooses to advertise a vacancy in any newspaper of generalcirculation, such as the Star Tribune or the St. Paul Pioneer Press, Defendant shall also advertise the vacancy in one or more media outlets that target women such as the Minnesota Womens Press. Defendant shall also recruit from sources and/or organizations aimed at women. Nothing in this agreement precludes Defendant from any further non-discriminatory recruitment or advertising as it deems appropriate. I. Enforcement of Consent Decree If at any time during the effective date of this Consent Decree, the EEOC believes that a violation of this Decree has occurred, prior to exercising its right to move to compel enforcement, the EEOC shall give written notice detailing the perceived violation to Defendant. Defendant shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of written notice to investigate and respond in writing to the allegation that a violation has occurred. Thereafter, the parties shall have a period of thirty (30) days, or such additionalperiod as may be agreed upon in writing by them, in which to engage in negotiation and conciliation regarding any alleged
4

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 5 of 9
violation before the EEOC may move to compel compliance. J. Certification to the EEOC Within 10 calendar days following compliance with the posting, training and creation/dissemination
of anti-discrimination policy provisions of this Consent Decree, Defendant will notify the EEOC of such compliance through a letter from an appropriate representative.
K. No Other Agreements This Consent Decree constitutes the sole agreement between and among the parties concerning the settlement of the above-captioned lawsuit. The parties agree that no promises or inducements have been made except as set forth in this Consent Decree, and the Release between Eliasen and Lubrication Technologies, Inc., and that there are no other agreements, written or oral, express or implied, between or among the parties concerning the subject matter of this lawsuit. L. Enforcement of Terms of Consent Decree and Jurisdiction Upon execution of the Consent Decree by the parties, the parties will execute a Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2), to dismiss this case without costs to the parties, with the Court to reserve jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the Consent Decree. The affirmative obligations under this Consent Decree shall be effective and binding upon the parties for the period of two calendar years from its final approval by the Court. This Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action for the purpose of enforcing this Decree and entry of such further orders as may be necessary or appropriate for the same period of time, except that, if any party has, prior to the expiration of the two year period, commenced proceedings to compelcompliance, this Court will retain jurisdiction of the action until all issues relating to such compliance proceedings have been resolved. At the end of the two year
5

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 6 of 9

period, or as soon as all enforcement issues (if any) have been resolved, whichever occurs last, this Court will dissolve the Consent Decree and will dismiss this action with prejudice without further motion by any party.
I have read the foregoing Consent Decree, and accept and agree to the provisions contained therein.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Date: July 5, 2005

s/Jean P. Kamp Jean P. Kamp Regional Attorney

Date: July 6, 2005

s/Tina Burnside Tina Burnside (WI#1026965) Senior Trial Attorney Minneapolis Area Office 330 Second Avenue South, Suite 430 Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 335-4047
Attorneys for Plaintiff

Date: June 30, 2005

SEATON, BECK, PETERS, BOWEN & FEUSS
s/Shareen Luze Alec J. Beck (#201133) Shareen R. Luze (#304359) 7300 Metro Boulevard, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55439 (952) 896-1700
6

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 7 of 9

Attorneys for Defendant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, v.
LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 04-4170 (JNE/SRN)

)

)

)

)

)

Stipulation and Order for Dismissal With Prejudice

Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and based upon the attached

Consent Decree, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) and Lubrication

Technologies, Inc. hereby stipulate to the dismissal of this action with prejudice, and to retention of

jurisdiction by the Court to enforce the provisions of the Consent Decree.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Date: July 5, 2005

s/Jean P. Kamp Jean P. Kamp Regional Attorney

Date: July 6, 2005

s/Tina Burnside Tina Burnside (WI#1026965) Senior Trial Attorney Minneapolis Area Office 330 Second Avenue South, Suite 430

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 8 of 9

Minneapolis, MN 55401 (612) 335-4047 Attorneys for Plaintiff
SEATON, BECK, PETERS, BOWEN & FEUSS

Date: June 30, 2005

s/Shareen Luze Alec J. Beck (#201133) Shareen R. Luze (#304359) 7300 Metro Boulevard, Suite 500 Minneapolis, MN 55439 (952) 896-1700
Attorneys for Defendant

Case 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN Document 31 Filed 07/13/2005 Page 9 of 9

NOTICE TO EMPLOYEES

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, v.
LUBRICATION TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
Defendant.

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 04-4170 (JNE/SRN)

)

)

)

)

)

This Notice is being posted pursuant to an agreement between the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and Lubrication Technologies, Inc. A charge was filed with the EEOC by Julie Eliasen alleging that Lubrication Technologies, Inc. violated Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating against her because she is a woman. Although Lubrication Technologies, Inc. contends that it did not discriminate against any employee, as part of the agreement, Lubrication Technologies, Inc., has agreed to take the following steps:

1. Without admitting any violation of the law, Lubrication Technologies, Inc. agrees not to engage in any type of discrimination prohibited by Title VII.

2. Lubrication Technologies, Inc. will provide training to its supervisors, managers, and administrators in regard to its policies forbidding any discrimination on the basis of sex.

3. Lubrication Technologies, Inc. will disseminate its anti-discrimination policies to its supervisors, managers, and administrators outlining that sex discrimination is prohibited.

The EEOC enforces Title VII, which prohibits job discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex or national origin, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Equal Pay Act, prohibitions against discrimination against individuals with disabilities in the federal sector, sections of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, and Title I of the Americans with Disabilities Act, which prohibits discrimination against people with disabilities in the private sector and state and local governments. The Minneapolis office of the EEOC is located at 330 S. Second Ave., Suite 430, Minneapolis, MN 55401. The office is open from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through Friday. Persons interested in contacting the EEOC may do so either by visiting or writing or by calling (612) 335-4040.

EXHIBIT A

 
 CM/ECF - District of Minnesota - Live - Docket Report

https://ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?473250379949369-L_9...

CLOSED, JYDMD, PROTO, T7
U.S. District Court District of Minnesota (DMN) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Lubrication Technologies, Inc. Assigned to: Judge Joan N. Ericksen Referred to: Magistrate Judge Susan R. Nelson Cause: 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)

Date Filed: 09/22/2004 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Plaintiff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by Jean P Kamp Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 310 W Wisconsin Ave Ste 800 Milwaukee, WI 53203-2292 414-297-1860 Fax: 414-297-3146 Email: jean.kamp@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Tina Burnside Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 129 W Trade St Ste 400 Charlotte, NC 28202 704-344-6876 Fax: 704-344-6780 Email: tina.burnside@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant Lubrication Technologies, Inc.

represented by Alec J Beck Seaton Beck & Peters, PA 7300 Metro Blvd Ste 500 Mpls, MN 55439 952-896-1700 Fax: 952-896-1704 Email: abeck@seatonlaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

1 of 4

6/18/2007 9:54 AM

CM/ECF - District of Minnesota - Live - Docket Report

https://ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?473250379949369-L_9...

Shareen R Luze RBC Dain Rauscher Inc PO Box 1160 Mpls, MN 55402-4422 612-371-7750 Fax: 612-371-7755 Email: shareen.luze@rbcdain.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 09/22/2004
09/22/2004 10/06/2004
10/07/2004 10/18/2004 10/18/2004 10/20/2004
11/19/2004 12/03/2004 12/03/2004

#

Docket Text

1 COMPLAINT against Lubrication Technologies, Inc. , filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. JURY DEMAND BY PLAINTIFF. ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOAN N. ERICKSEN PER 440 CIVIL RIGHTS (T7) LIST AND REFERRED TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SUSAN R. NELSON,(4:04 AD 614) filing fee waived. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(DFL) (Entered: 09/22/2004)
Summons Issued as to Lubrication Technologies, Inc. (DFL) (Entered: 09/22/2004)
2 DOCUMENT FILED IN ERROR, FILED IN WRONG CASE. SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Lubrication Technologies, Inc. served on 10/5/2004, answer due 10/25/2004. (JMM) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/7/2004 (JMM) (Entered: 10/06/2004)
3 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Lubrication Technologies, Inc. served on 10/5/2004, answer due 10/25/2004. (JMM) (Entered: 10/07/2004)
4 ANSWER to Complaint by Lubrication Technologies, Inc..(Luze, Shareen) (Entered: 10/18/2004)
5 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lubrication Technologies, Inc. (Luze, Shareen) (Entered: 10/18/2004)
6 Notice of Pretrial Conference: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/22/2004. Pretrial Conference set for 12/2/2004 02:15 PM in In Chambers Hearing before Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson on 10/20/04. (Attachments: # 1 Consent Form)(HLL) (Entered: 10/20/2004)
7 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Lubrication Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 11/19/2004)
8 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson : Rule 16 Scheduling Conference held on 12/2/2004. (RJL) (Entered: 12/03/2004)
9 PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 1/2/2005. Discovery due by 6/6/2005. Motions (non-disp) due 6/15/2005. Motions (disp) due by 7/15/2005. Ready for trial due by 12/1/2005.Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson on 12/3/04. (RJL) (Entered: 12/03/2004)

2 of 4

6/18/2007 9:54 AM

CM/ECF - District of Minnesota - Live - Docket Report

https://ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?473250379949369-L_9...

02/09/2005 02/09/2005 02/09/2005 02/09/2005
02/09/2005
02/16/2005 02/17/2005
02/28/2005 03/07/2005 03/15/2005 03/15/2005 03/16/2005 03/17/2005 03/17/2005 03/18/2005

10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 02/09/2005)
11 NOTICE of Hearing on Motion 10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment: Motion Hearing set for 4/4/2005 11:00 AM in St Paul - Courtroom 3 before Judge Joan N Ericksen. (Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 02/09/2005)
12 MEMORANDUM in Support re 10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 02/09/2005)
13 Declaration of Tina Burnside in Support of 10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4# 5 Exhibit 5)(Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 02/09/2005)
14 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re 10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment, 11 Notice of Hearing on Motion, 12 Memorandum in Support of Motion, 13 Declaration in Support (Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 02/09/2005)
15 STIPULATION for Protective Order by Lubrication Technologies, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Luze, Shareen) (Entered: 02/16/2005)
16 PROTECTIVE ORDER That parties shall be bound by the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order signed by both parties and filed with the Court on 2/16/05. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson on 2/17/05. (JMH) (Entered: 02/17/2005)
17 Return of Service Executed for Subpoena served on Theresa Gade on 2/23/05, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (RJL) (Entered: 02/28/2005)
18 NOTICE OF Settlement Conference set for 5/12/2005 09:30 AM in In Chambers Hearing, Suite 242 before Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson. Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson on 3/7/05. (RJL) (Entered: 03/08/2005)
19 STIPULATION for Defendant to Amend Answer by Lubrication Technologies, Inc.. (Luze, Shareen) (Entered: 03/15/2005)
20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lubrication Technologies, Inc. (Luze, Shareen) (Entered: 03/15/2005)
21 ORDER TO AMEND ANSWER Defendant shall have leave of the Court to Amend its Answer, re 19 Stipulation . Signed by Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson on 3/16/05. (JMH) (Entered: 03/16/2005)
22 AMENDED ANSWER to 1 Complaint, by Lubrication Technologies, Inc.. (Luze, Shareen) (Entered: 03/17/2005)
23 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Lubrication Technologies, Inc. re 22 Amended Answer to Complaint. (Luze, Shareen) (Entered: 03/17/2005)
24 MOTION to Withdraw 10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment via letter to Judge Joan Ericksen by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 03/18/2005)

3 of 4

6/18/2007 9:54 AM

CM/ECF - District of Minnesota - Live - Docket Report

https://ecf.mnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?473250379949369-L_9...

03/18/2005 04/11/2005 04/29/2005 04/29/2005 05/12/2005 05/23/2005 07/13/2005 07/13/2005

25 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re 24 MOTION to Withdraw 10 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment via letter to Judge Joan Ericksen. (Burnside, Tina) (Entered: 03/18/2005)
26 Return of Service Unexecuted not served on Thomas Antl, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (JMH) (Entered: 04/11/2005)
27 Return of Service Executed for Subpoena served on Cameron Loll on 4/22/05, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (RJL) (Entered: 04/29/2005)
28 Return of Service Executed for Subpoena served on Jason Versluis on 4/27/05, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (RJL) (Entered: 04/29/2005)
29 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Susan R Nelson : Settlement Conference held on 5/12/2005 - Case settled. (RJL) (Entered: 05/12/2005)
30 ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Joan N Ericksen on May 23, 2005. (slf) (Entered: 05/23/2005)
31 CONSENT DECREE . Signed by Judge Joan N Ericksen on July 12, 2005. (slf) (Entered: 07/13/2005)
32 ORDER re 31 Consent Decree. Signed by Judge Joan N Ericksen on July 12, 2005. (slf) (Entered: 07/13/2005)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

PACER Login:
Description:
Billable Pages:

06/18/2007 09:56:21

hs0328 Client Code: eeoc

Docket Report

Search Criteria:

0:04-cv-04170-JNE-SRN

3

Cost:

0.24

4 of 4

6/18/2007 9:54 AM