Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 30

•

.;,J

'

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

cv - '0~ -

0 1 1 9 6 FILED

I No. - - - - - - - - - - (iv, Ac.+"1on

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT llENVER. COLORADO

.~ATHAIV JtRARb blANLAf MATTHEW FRA/VSISCO ALFARO, ond
K'IAN MERRII~

MAY 2 6 2009
GREGORY C. LANGHAM CLERK

v.
ARlS lEDES ?:__AVAR./4S, ird1vidually, and.
'" \--\is ot~·;G·w./ co.pacHy as C:xe.c~tflve_
bincdor ot +he Colorado I:JepartMen+ of
(CJrrec:\:-,ons,
SU.S AN }ONEg, iru:livlduct!iy, al'ld In he•
ctt/tiC\.1 Cil.pr.H.ify as -J. ht ~Jarden ct +he
Color(ldo .Sk+e Penih11ticq·y, D. (OfY'lBS whose --l-rue 1\CtvYJt IS unknown,
1(\(f(v•clu.o.\1~: MJ \Y\ \1\s J-\'-ilktl Cetpatif(! Q.S
o. hto.ring CJ'.J•'"HY\'iHee. membef; \<.. fY1 DORE, vJ hose +rl-!t net Me ·,s W"' krtOL<ll')
inot iv7cL.ti:t II~. and in her o~frda I cApae1J~ as
0.. htar'il'l_3 t-Om1"1·;-J+et I'Y1~Mbe.r, ond
j. OLSOfl), v:>hest +rut ncrme ts un~nowl)
lndivlttua/1~, and ifl hi-S ot~icJC!./ capacif~ as
htllr'in!J l.\J~'Ylrn'i Hee chalrpuson,

RECEIVED
UNITED STATES· DISTRICTCOURT
DENVER, COLORADO
MAY 14 2009
GREGORY C. LANGHAM CLERK

1.

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 30 '

PRlSO!VfRS COMDLAINT

A PARTiES

lA N(.\+ho\'1 }e\a_rd. tu.r\\ctp, tt'(,~ILJ8, Cc\omolo Stt<h. ?end·entiury,
P.O. Box 7-1--':J-, (o.ni'JI') CHy I co 8 ms- (Jfl-7-1

113. r')cd+hew Fran$iSLO AlfC<ro, #- //0/9/ ( ColorocRo S-lc-d·e. PeriiterYftary,

PO. {jox R-7- to.il~n I

CH·y CO I

21J.1.S- (J)f-f-7

s. K. (Y\oore., Hw r'i flj (O>'YIN1i -ffn 01 trl1 ber, Cv IorD.cl o Shh Peni}enti~ ry,

PD. Gox 1-1--f, Co.nun _Ci-1-y, CO 25 /J.I.S- flYFR

A+ +'ht i-'1me. the. c\c.tii'Yl(.s) a.\1e.gtd in th·,-S co.""p.lct·,nf etrose,+his

ct<.fvw\curl was a~.-t-·,ng u.vwler
~ht p-<-rsons who suppusedl~

co.lo> ot
c.e;ndL<d

s-\oJe
adseg

low. Sk i~ one of
~\assititcd-ion

.-ev'•tw heo.riV\SS o.nol also d~udes -to ~e.tCLin p\aih-1-·,~~ ln

o.dseg.

<,. T Dison, Hf.aril'l_g_ (o,·mYJI#ee. Chairperson, Coloro.olo Stah
Pen,+ety\:,a•y, P.O. box 1-f-i-, C.anon C·,+y, CD '8/J.tS-@lR·
A+ +he +I lYle the. dliir'Yl(S) Q lle.3e..d In th'ts c..v•np\O.Inl- o. rost, +his cl.ehncl.Qrr+ wos oc+ing lA.Vlder c.olor ot sl-ate. \Qw. He. Is oM of
+hi?. \)tiSO()S w\1o supposed\'8 c.onclu.t+ a.dsQg e-las<,ifit.o+icm
review hearin:JS Mol also decide.s +o rdain plcti11.f-1#s In
ndseg.

)A.

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 30 A. PARTIES (tc,.\t)

At the time the claim(s) alleged in this complaint arose, was this defendant acting under
color of state law? .::L Yes _No (CHECK ONE). Briefly explain your answer:
ij, ·,. ltgoll~ IC>poos·1l· for the OJif<!ll opud.,on J of +he C.)orclfW J)toar-J,e.+

3· · J:.Qn ::Sones
At the time the claim(s) alleged in this complaint arose, was this defendant acting under color of state law? .J,_ Yes _No (CHECK ONE). Briefly explain your answer:
She ··~ \f<Q• MSiblt ±kr th~ l'j:trah., 0~ csr a"d tl& .,./Jl<re D~ o./1 tlw pt'!w.o/15

4.

P. 0. Eo + Ca.;,'"'

At the time the claim(s) alleged in this complaint arose, was this defendant acting under
color of state law? ..L Yes _No (CHECK ONE). Briefly explain your answer:
He 1> om o£ ffi~ persoM !A!Nl S4f<PO};f.£il~ cand.ucfs adm·reisfro-/{ve Sejffjt<~M
wl~,~·~o~a~~J~'e~r~r~~~~~~·~c~/Q~~~·~c~·a~bo~n~!~~v~,•~~~h~~~r~,"~~a~n~J~a~i~~o~~f~.~u~J~~_u~·l1
piC!.in~r ~ ill ad.s:e.s,
(If you are suing more tillm three defendants, use extra paper to provide the information requested above for each additional defendant. The infom1ation about additional defendants should be labeled "A. PARTIES.")

(Rev. 1/30/07)

2B

. Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 30 '

B. JURISDICTION

1. I assert jurisdiction over my civil rights claim(s) pursuant to: (check one if applicable)

l

28 U.S.C. § 1343 and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (state prisoners)

28 U.S.C. § 1331 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents ofFed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) (federal prisoners)
2. I assert jurisdiction pursuant to the following additional or alternative statutes (if any):

C. NATURE OF THE CASE
BRIEFLY state the background of your case. If more space is needed to describe the nature of
p ·; I the case, use extra paper to complete this section. The additional allegations regarding the nature
CS of the case should be labeled "C. NATURE OF THE CASE.'~ 5 0 LDJe.d lfl Utnon Crl·y, C.O. Ba.sQ£{ "'ron ·rl\\'ortl'lai-ion and .be/,e{, 1+ holds QpP,IOf\mtAe.\'i tS0 pnsoners:_?r,saners o.re. wQrehou~ul '1"' SlY. stp~m+t
pods8 PoJs A, E, C, .b, f, and F. t.o..£.h pod eonfa)n$ e.ight u.nifs. tGe.h
u.n'rt L\w>'\a:rns 15' ~ 1i.o t~ \L. All prlsc,,ers c.o.,~in d In CSP qrt . rlo..c.t.d \n oJs~. AJs~ \~ ~Q_ l'l\OS:t l'tstfit.-\4\1~ I l:~(s-1-oJ~ ltvel +h«i-
(Qn b~ IMpGsecl u.pon a Co lonLJc De.parfment of G:,rec:tJons
Lht.l"tlnG~ter re~e.rrQ.c/ +o Q-S "C1J9C') pds.or1er: H i, also the. fl'\Ost
C.O'I\~~o\\J. e.vw·,r~mevYt pcssU,\t through 1\1t c\ct~~-~~iw:Hon proce>S anci
\s where. o..\mo.s+ e_vuy Ospe.c+ o~ a pfisoner5 b~e. is Conf.rolled iil'\d
'()'lOv~itore.J
::l, 111 o..ds~ ·,fl csP I tusd upon lr,~rml!+lti•'\ O.t\cl IJe.lltf/ ea.ch
lJI"'iSCl•"Jer Is con~rfle.d, by hil>"lsel~, 1-u Q tel/ wi~ 0~ ltss fhall i80
S~\..lQre ~ee+ o~ ~Iocr space and 35 s~uan ~ee.+ o¥ uneneuMhered spute. allfnJst .:!3 ·-tv J~ hours a doy. Tfie ceil has o narrow
outsidt ~,AJ)ndow -tlwf CQ,.,'f be. ope.lld AllhoUjh 'rt CJZn bt cl!mrned,
+ht c.e.l/ \l3h+ rem£tins on J.L.{ hours a J.o.y. Th~ .cell door Is solid
(Ylt~l wr+fi mekl drops along +he side.s and .boffom whkh fY)a.ke
1+ cJif.l'iwl-f k UJmMunic.afe wif/, others. If also lws 01 small Jhi'rJ.

(Rev. 1/30/07)

3A

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 30

C /JATURE OF TH£ CASE (con'f-)

~ l(\ ss ' LA'J ;ndo~v nd (1_ Cl "~ccl/ (. (,( r-t " s Iot +i10.f c.a Y) On I~ lx

cpwecl 01 tlosrcd by s~a¥f

.

3.. Th~r~ on: shit+ lifYlih on +he types ,and OIY!Ollnf of

pe>scno.l Rrop:rty Q priso,:e,- can •hovt /n ~clseg in CSP. Th~.

d f\U.IY\btr

phCl11t calls priSOners. Ill adseg in csP WI~ (Y)Oke +o

fQm/ ly ~~"".bers, td~n~s. 0nd afforVJf'Y5 is severel~ limited ond

oppor+etn1+1es . tor VISttoJion ore_ ra.re.. and u lwoy.s co.,duded +hrDIAgh. o ijiO.s~ v.Jcd/.Aii_prisoners cc,.AtiMd in. odseg in CSP

are den1ed ou-hitor -exerc.1se aV'!d loi.e_ +he abJ/ily 1o earn

good .t-,mt.

'-/. As e\11denced in pnrf by no.n1ecl plw.1MI /Ja+han Iert£rd D\.ll\ \Qps ( herel"'o~ter· ltferre.ct J.b cts ''bun lei') a/mosf ·t'hirfeen, an?!

s+; II cwn+lng, ytars in adseg In C5P, na,Yietl. p/C1in1-lff (Y)a#hel-tJ

Fro.nsisto Alf'an)s ( here.inCifhr referrul k QS ''Alfaro') fl?ree plus,

B.f1ct sf; II U!unfi.1g, years in cdseg in C5P nc(n1ed plo.inMf Ryan
[Y)erri th (here.i·l\ll.tfer ltferred to as "Merrdf) tour plus, afld sfi/1

couo+;'ng, y~a.cs in ndse.g,'u1 o.ds~g 1fJ CSP beg'1nnin5 and s'1nce

aboLt+ +he lo+hr ywr one/ Cr half, Ctntl other pr,s.o,)eds) clcuiYI{sJ,

set 'b'hibi+s C +hru E ", rden+ion in odseg In. CsP varies .
o. nd Is tor an indd'i ncJe peric•d of 1-irYJ"- -flx1+ Is on/ y Ii,')'/ i+ed
by a _pr'1soner's life ("lr senfence.

s. lntC(r(e.-o.+lon in aciYcj in CSP ';s synonyMous wifh
tx+rerl\e isola-f,on. Pr·,soners in od.seg in CSP are deprived o~

ctln1o.sf any tnvirO•'Y\enh.( or Stnsory s+ii'YI111/i and o# a!f>'lOsf a//
hU.MM con+r.tc+. /he_ concliftol]s o~ confinerY~e,Jf fhaf ~x'i:J Jfl ndses in CSP on: net only a behavior rllt.cdl~fcotion -fool, fh4t
is st.po.ra.te. trom l"ht Cocl~ ot Penc,\ bisc..lpllne .process, .bL~+
f-he y are 4\ so mort re shi cJ-i ve. +han any o+her torrYJ o~ inc.Ctrc.en)tion in +he. CbOC. S\..\th conditions ot Coo~lnemed tl'l'l{:lo.se atypical ano/ slgn·~~lc..anf hardships on a prisoneo- t'n re\o.Jio" -1-t> +ht cx-d inary incidents o{ prhon l',~e.
(.,, Upo(l lrY\'CJrfYlO.+kli') and be. lie~ ?er policy, prcxc+tc.e..,and/or

3B

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 30

C. ;VATURE OF THE CASE Ceo...;+)

proce.clu.re., prlsox>trs c_on-\'\,.eJ in orlse3 '111 CsP rue:/ve Mon-Jhly
ads~q clossl~iu'r\-1on review furms 'ln~itcJing +l•e ovtcom., o~ an
o~se.g c\os:ifkQ~Ion re;iew hto.•-in9· In reo.\\+y, such mcn;h\~ adseg e.\tlS~l~IC.J1+ion rtv'l~w to11'YlS ore_ ?tdufldory. Along w•+h
those. .\'onns,in ·1'1·~ event a" a.d;u.et\ uJseg class,',+ie..o-/too revievJ

~l'.Ctl'ins 1-Daf- p\o.c.t, +l.ey Me C\ shO.rrJ.

T. \Apon \Y\~W'!Y\a..+ioo onct belle{ pF pll\lcy pro.d1ct, and/or

prot..t~ur:, prlson.ers

C.Gr;~IVJe.d

In, adse.s,

1
iV1 , CsP ,ha.ve.

never

been,

C\J-,o\ ure."-\-, prov1 dtJ u.i1 th Ct I"HYi:Jtt of w h~n +ht rtpod·ed aolseg

c.\Qs5'rj:itet-Aon rt'ilew vvou.lJ -1-eth plate prior -\-D ;+ repcr+ed/'d

k k1 "3 p\ac.e.,

s. 'vlpcn \n~"orma-Bt»~ a"J he. II~{ p~r pc,\rc\j \)rQtfluc, o.nd/or

prot.~\t pr'i so11~<rs

CIX\~

1
u_re.A+

c~l\ovutd

Lo,-Jin~J '1'1\ acAs~ in
iD o:\t~"J any o~ t\.Q

1
CSP have. never
n.pcd-ed odse.s

been,

du.ss't

ft

to.-ti

1
G!\

nv'i twS SO +\,Qy

UJc_c\ct

\)\~-Stnt

ev·:Jel'ltt o.V)d/or

qrgu.Mtn:s \0 +h~:.' --!'ttvor or ft J.ispu.tt +he in~~ upon ~hkh

the nv1 t.vv Co•-nvY\ ,'\]-ee rnem bt\5 re.\ y on -\-u re:\-a-111 them tn

etds~eg \n csP.

9. Upon in-\brMdi0•1 Cmt~ ~~~~~, ptr po\ic.y, pratfic.e, (Jnd/or

pnxechtrt I p('isonen. Con~!'ne& lf\ wls~ ifl CSP ho.ve. nd been I and
o.rtr\t, prcV'ide.d wiH the -l'o.ehta/ bo:sis -~r fu~ r-~v·fecv

c_ow,rviit\-n'.s decision ~ xc\Q\., theM ·In o.Jseg. I" tn~+, +he

Je.C:isions lt:llo\tr-d by +h~ \.~c;,_n'"5 CO>'Y\miihe -1-o n.fo3n pri:stmers

In o.ch~g are. based 011 Clr bihctr'j 0'1eaningless, C..Up rkocts, anal billS

-ruc.+ors. Sc,"ff~+imes

O..ppQren+/~ , i'rJ

1
o..cwrdance

v:;lth

pci,ty, pfQc+:ttt

1

o.nd/or pnJt.ed.\.tre.
f(ll, A/so, in o.olcti·H'on 1-u nof fru+-kA.I/~ bei11~ provl~eJ wtfh

notic-e. o¥ v-~hfl.f Conkd Is netHSQry oP a p"isoner ffJ order +o

progresc; ou+ o~ a_d.s~ in Cs~ pr1son~r~ }~, ad~~ ~~ C.SP ore,~+

g1vtr• the. opporkndy fo appta! fhp__ ad.seg dassd1whofl rev'fei.v

htarJ f'l~ comvvi,-ltee'.s dec/&lons, per pc Lty, pro.cf:tce., ano/Jo•

voc.uLure.

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 30

C /J ATURf OF THE CA:;£ (Co•~+)

11. The_ nforementionul po/itlfl.sJradhe.s, and/or procee.~ures

we..re... c...n..a+e..d a.nd/or iMplemer.J by ct~f~0cianfs Ans+edes

lovo..nl.S ( he.reJDaf+ec referred -ft., as. "i.avara{) and Susan Jooe.s

(he.re..ino:-i4-er n ..fe.rrecl iu CIS ··Jones'), JkPudanfs };, Combs

Ch~rt.IM~ttr r.Jur~d io as ''[c,Y\bs") k. Moore. Lhertinofter re~erred
io as ,. rloore") o..nd T 0 \son ( herei ~a4er 1e~erred +o ag "Olson")

ore some of +he reporte.d h,ea r1~1j' ru!Y>tY(iifee J'Ylem1ers .Jasked

w1th, o.nct ad-uet \I~;~ ~r;e Co•~o!_ud-in,g

hwriAgs

011d

1
IU\c!.en 1)9 olec.;sfon'-

+o

adse~ rei-am

cla~ittc"'Ho11. rev';ecv
a pr;soner Ill a.cJ:,~

,
;n

c.sP.

. . 1:<. Defe"dcu,+s ~~warc1s .ar>d Jones hc1vc ~d-u.c<l knowledj't ef
the_ su.bs-\-a,.,.f,o.l nsK o~ senous harm tu pr1soner~ a+ CSf ca.u.sed
by tht camp Ide den)a./ o~ oLd-door . ~XeiC;se._ e>ve.f o1\ extenled
pe.rioJ of -Hmt. thty Knuw o.boi.(f bo+l. M~ no.r e.x..1stance. oP

b~.-ci-J.iDor -e.x.erc.lse Qs descrlud o.bov·e... and fhQ_ resu/1-inJ l'h k ·-io o.

p-r,>oner'.s. \!w.\-1-h. Thi> risk is /Mgs.tundl~j, pervo..sive, and apparenf
to ar.y KMvvledg~Qh\~ observer.

13 A:; a re sJJ of the. subdan--ha/ risk of smous harm

c.ause.d by -H~t c.omple+e Jenln/ oP vddoo: e.xerc,st ovc• an

hh"'J~J
surel~

period o~ Jd-,t>io.-c<i-lrt~

ti!Yplth1y.osri:ston/n/e~rs

in
Qnd

adseg if) CSP art sioul~ buf
menfa/ly. Wt+'ho~t Oc(.J.,ioor .. .

~~~rc.isq,., pr1s.cners are.. L.tl',etbl'<. tu k ~xposd -/-o t<nMI-ereJ sunflljhf

Su.d. l)..n~i!-J-ere.d SLtnliJhf IS essen+iAI -fo, a persDil -}o prudu.a

V,{-cun'Jo JJ. That vif.amlfl is n~eded ·-J.o aiel i11 Jhe C1bs,orp-hon J
ca\cilA.rvl a.nd pho~phorl.(s -fu bu.'JJ bone and avror.l +he. r'isk o~

os+eoporo.Sl.s a_r,d fra.dur-e.s. !Vu..NJtrov..~ priso•1ers htNt su#'erreel

fr\J1Y\ dtp;-essiot\ ch._e +o th~ lcnk o~ oq+dot~ exerC:I.>e. In oJ

h.as.+ Ont t.Q.se., o prisoner s-h.pped -tQ-hn_!j for several weeks
ond +r\e.c1 +o stu•~ it. de.a.th ctu~ -fu +h~ /Qck oP OLAclvcr
-txt~C:i~t ht ltu.d txperl~nted o-Jel (ln appn.;xi.•1ctl-e f,,_;e./vt

y~a.r span.
H. Upo•1 '\1\~{)rfYicrtlbf\ C1nd betk\', -stvcroJ prisoners have -f,/ee/

3])

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 30

-C. NATURE OF TN£ CASE (coritl

adl'i\lrils1-rQ.+rve_ gr\~VctnteS 0\Jer 'tht r 'jW\5 C0FYlpJQ~flf!ij ~ qtouf

+ht \cd:.

o~

CJu~clt>O r

c.f e._')( e,rc.Js.t. in "C~ P.$ofY'It

+n~s~ .3' lt\lilJ'Ites

A 01e lfi<L\v.chd ·~"' +l-\1s t-\b•Yl\)htnt.See [xh'iblh and B. IJ/so,o+

Itas+ On't c:;th~r pl'is.one.- wh\J vJCS CU1~1n~ c,+ CSP -for

+J s.evuo.\ 'j~<.n.cs \ \1as ~~lui. (\
lacK o~ olchU:.()r ~xH-<2-\S.t-

<r~\ ~QtAlSU:1t :IY'\ req_Qrds l'D 1-hQ. at C::,R Se..e.. \-ogle '\1. Bersor\ 43S

J=:}:J 1JSJ, 1J59- 0{/) ( J(}i~, C1r. :/0()&;).

IS. .btsp,+-e -fht j,c_)c~~.,+s, c1escr;.b~d abo.:e.../ pr'rsoner hee.lfh a.+

CSP has nd improvd.llehnota...Js LCt vara~ and Jones hQve.

rta+ ~1~

cre..a. ted ptl1c\
shps ntcessctry

e.+s,o prpruro:ivilccets~,

oncl/or prucedures prisoner-s CO•Y\':intel

ond/or Ja Ken
In csP v./rtl,

(')u.+door tYtiLISt. 'As a. re.s.Ll If o~ t'ne..s,t ~Yiures, pr'Jso,er:s

ccn-1-\f\VLt -\-c, de..+e.r1 or-o:te_ p\\ystlo. lly one/ tYJtnfa..lly e..~p~r/ we 1

chpres.sian, and nd be e)<po.sed ·-1-D Ltn.fi/fered sunltjhf.

3£

·. Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 30

D. CAUSE OF ACTION
State concisely every claim that you wish to assert in this action. For each claim, specify the right that allegedly has been violated and state all supporting facts that you consider important, including the date(s) on which the incident(s) occurred, the name(s) of the specific person(s) involved in each claim, and the specific facts that show how each person was involved in each claim. You do not need to cite specific cases to support your claim(s). If additional space is needed to describe any claim or to assert more than three claims, use extra paper to continue that claim or to assert the additional claim(s). The additional pages regarding the cause of action should be labeled "D. CAUSE OF ACTION."

I. Claim One: P\o.'1M:rt\s' .bue ?roce» Rtghls /ire Beifljj \/1clo:hd

. SupportingFacts: PlaJdrWs Supper+ +ht -\\,\lowi "S cJlliN) by reSelttltt ~ +hL prevlvLlS see-+ions a.nd parasrttphs of fh1s
~G>'¥\\)\c(rnt. fne_ LO>,cli-\-10;')<, D~ (Gn~in~W\e_11l O..S pnv;C•Ltsl~

descr,be.d gtvt f'ise.. -\-D.o. \',bed·y 1n+erest See W:IKir1SOY\ v Aysifn,

1?.5 S.C+. )38'1, ).395
JJdex,dads :tacvaras

(J.0Vs)j fosk,
and Sones

43~ F3al
crea-l-ion

at Jlsq,JJ&S:
and/or impleM~ni~-Hon

oi +h7 prevtousl~ Mtn-Hone.d. pohcies,pmd-lce.s,av-d/or

proce.cfure.s tha+ -flail 1o COIYipl~ wi+h +he tYltl'limum

re..q,uirem~nh ,_ o~ wh'o ore. be.if\1

proced u ra( d.epr-1ved of

&.ue
a

. process, aff'or~ed pr_isoners
l,herty rnferesf-, rleprrv~ and

c:.on-Hnu.es +o d-tpr'!v·e, +he plo.il'lftff5 of -M,12lr rtjhfs L(nder,

+uh~ni~e.1du.es+aP+roescessCr:JC(I)dQ-ur+su.-~Hon,of +h~ Fo~.-(deen+h Amend me11f -fo -Jhe.

(Rev. 113 0/07)

4

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 30
• ••

2. Claim Two: Plcun-lrfb' Di.!e ~rocm Kls~+s Art. Be 1119 \Jioia.+eJ

r·\\ · \ ' Supporting Fa.cts: 1r'-\'iO•.IVJAiH'IrPtS

J
Suppoq

_, L rnt

t<> \lv01f19. C.U.itvl

yb.

rt~~rlntt .}o the prN10\AS sn+1o•'ls and parasraphs ?f this C..CJ•"'p\~int.lJe.{e1i"'d.~"+.s (o,,bs, Pl\lore, a.n:J OlsM or~ th"t hearing

caVViw\tttet ~Y~trY1b~r.s wi!C> 1nu"Vt_ concluchd, and L011+1nue_ ·fo

c.D•xtu.~e+, whCJ.t Clmou.nis 4il shaYYI ads~ cfagiftcd-iol) reviews and

ltc,ve ~~,Je.n:.J, Md can-1-fnu~ 1-o l~fldtt:; dec.Tsions /u rd-ain fhQ.
nJ \)\o_\1\-i-l~fs bo.s!U:I .t>n c( r b~-\.a.ry, fY1to.ninsl es~ , C.Qp rl c'•oLt s, a bias
~fG\-lncAs In \J,o\o,-\lon o~ -\~>t p\ctlntl~fs' r'ij\-J.s u.nder "'h~ Due

\Jroce ss C\Q\.\.5e o~ the Fourhtntl'l A(I'JenJ vn~f)f -!D fht Urid·er/

S~u.+e.s Co!'1s·hk.he>n.

(Rev. 1/30/07)

5

..

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 30 •,

3. Claim Three: Pla.in=\:1~$' hgh1h AMeodmerrl R'jb±s Are &if~$ Vwlqfed

Supporting

Facts:
,

\'.>\Qirrfi~fs

suppl!A

,
+ht

+6\lo~vin~

chim by

.

~~~e.ru\lt -\iJ the pnvlcus se.c-Hcos and paJas,mphs of' fh/s, ccmp!aitd

The.. de.\1\:,eqrh.. '\(\cl,~~efence 0~ dd'endanf::, lavo.ras and .Jones

to +h\i.. suhs\o.,.,-\-io.\ ,·,s\ o\' harm caused by .fh~ den.rcJl of (d/
ou+~oo r 0~1 C.1H O\le..r Qn ex+e"Jecl . perled of firnt ha.s
c.hprhrd, Qnol u.)n-Hnue..:-. fo d.e.pl'l\1~, He p/o.iniltv:. of i-hiir ,·~hts

v..ncl,e r th~ (,\At\ crncl Ll_,,ust..w.l Puf\lshrv,uds Clcu-i<;e.. \J 1he.

cig\,+\,-, A1"(\f.J\d Meni -t-o +h~ ClnAuf SiQte.c, (unsf,fl...i-Jt>n. See- Spo.i(}

v. Procur\ler, f.n00 F.J.J 189, /99-200(q+h Ck Iff?); wkith wa.s

ci-1-ed by 'lie v. Shil ; H "(?)~ F.J~ (pSI' Co53 (/(pH, Cr. /931);

which was C;t by Fo , '-135 F. ?J a:f 1J..0f/).

(Rev. 1/30/07)

6

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 30
•,

E. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS

Have you ever filed a lawsuit, other than this lawsuit, in any federal or state court while you were

incarcerated? .1_ Yes _No (CHECK ONE). If your answer is "Yes," complete this section of

the form. If you have filed more than one lawsuit in the past, use extra paper to provide the

necessary information for each additional lawsuit. The information about additional lawsuits

should be labeled "E. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS." I

b<C\1~"< I

-\\led 3 oc 'I cM·hrtn.J. i<LW>Liris io i·he.

L Name(s) of defendant(s) in prior

~ost W\\de T cb,\ m.all o.ll fht nam•J Je~eoJa.fs,

lawsuit:

I to.n s\4+.: th.y wtce "II CJ)oc_ e.,pluy<es
'

2. Docket number and court name:

l t.a.n'+ cte<>.\1 +lot ~tl<et numbers bert "\\ +),~
tases w<rt t, lie<.\ ·, o fut Fremv.TI ("""ly .l\'"lr'd C..,t

3. Claims raised in prior lawsuit:

4. Disposition of prior lawsuit (for example, is the prior lawsuit still pending? Was it dismissed?):
5. If the prior lawsuit was dismissed, when was it dismissed and why?

All <:«ses 1-c.J.. hen d:t>ou»e.J swe•d y<Ars ugo. All bu.+
one we-. d...s..c,.,.J -kc l'ruhn -j,. s\..t• C\ ci.tim, The
oth,, ...vtts clt;,;,.,J hqs.J "~>''' J,.J!,.,j""j' '")' iJ .wil<"

6. Result(s) of any appeal in the prior lawsuit:

at +lw -l-wc dei:•rc.-,s I """nJ "i' c\xu~o.-\S. ;o)Ft uWrr"'oJ I 0/1 a/l!)(\'

F. ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
1. Is there a formal grievance procedure at the institution in which you are confined?
,j_ Yes _No (CHECKONE).

2. Did you exhaust available administrative remedies? X Yes _No (CHECK ONE).

(Rev. 1/30/07)

7

.

·. Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 30

G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF
State the relief you are requesting. If you need more space to complete this section, use extra paper. The additional requests for relief should be labeled "G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF."
\JH EREJORf, pialnilf~s respHH'u \I~ pmys ~'''+ fu1s Courft

/. bec.\un. -Yhc.J- tht ac.h and D•Yiisslons descr·,bu{ herein vJolatecl

+ht pllliniift r1g hts under the CcnsHluJ.-ion onol lttw.s of fhe

Llr;1hd S+o+es

:J.. E.r·Jer IJ"t\imi,f'\ary 111'\ol pHrrtMto:+ tnjunchonS orctenng d.e.~enclcwts f.Qvo.ro.s. and Jcne.s, +heir $ucc..essors, ajerifs,

e"'p\oyee5, c.tnd all. p-eo.()r;' adrn9 '1n concert wdh +hern, prov,dt the p\o..inti~~s vSith out<kor extrcise.

3. En+~r ~nnOLnent frijundio'f1s d Q.J\c\e.rln_9 e~tnclan+~ ~avo.ras oncl.

J10v..,~s., -1-'ne:'~" S\.tttesc;ors,
C..o.1ur'\- wt'l-~ +hem, ·\c

Ct3enh, 'Oh'\p\oye.es, a_nJ , crro.h _and/or ,;YIP l-e

nil ment

1Derscn> ad·ihj pv lkie.s,

)11

\)ICI.d-iuoS, O.nd/oc p1vtUWfi'S mOtt v:)ti\ o.\1\)U) +hQ plc\·J,1h'·tf.s TO

o.-\te."'d +httr Qclseg c..\assi-\(cQ+ioY) rev'1tws, bt pro,;\de.d w·,+h a

nd-llt t>f whtn (ll'\ ads~ duss\~(tcrHon revre.w wil/ i-ah_ place_

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

I declare under penalty of perjury that I am the plaintiff in this action, that I have read this complaint, and that the information in this complaint is true and correct. See 28 U.S.C. § 1746; 18 U.S.C. § 1621.

Executed on Apr\ I 1'1 'J_([)f/)9
(Date)

(Rev. 1/30/07)

8A

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 30

G. REQUEST FOR RELIEF (con+)

a_1 \ws+ J~ hou.r.s p•\or ·to it -la\:Jns ?lace_ be.. Clllot.AJet~ -Jo

~~esen-\ ev·,cle~ct Ctv'lC~/?r orgu.VY1en~.s .111 +ht:ir r«vOI 0\ ··tu
cl.1spu.h. +hk- IIY~o\'M.QfiO() up~n which +he. nv1 evv (Gmm\HQe

aTe.. +h~

-,~ec..ly·h1~'tc\\1\

on. k o;e.-\0.:\n 1-'1-tem In adseg! be p-r_ovk.le.c/ bf\s1S -\'or +ht- .-evk~v CCJr,Y'Irr1iitee.'~ d~clsiOYJ

wi+h
·-J-o

n.+o..\'1) +\"w.V'f1 \n odse..9, be prov~de.d with ncrh'te.. of who.f

c_0 ,"'J~..td 'is 'fl'<.lf.s'YJ..ry o~ 1-hei'Y\ lY'I or-c\e.r -k, p•osr-e&s o~,+ of

nels"::\ 0.11d C>~ r;.nd bQ.. given the. o..1;/;~y +o o.ppecd -Me

ctchQ..g c\Clss'i~~ic.o.-hon \e.vitvJ hetl.rlf\g, C.Dto;m',ifee's dec.)sion.

'-/. Enter pe•mO V'l~n+ ln}-<.nt.-l--1 ons 0 ,J tri"5 cl ttfA\dQvrt~ Ccm bsI fYioore,

a"d Ol.son, +he1r Sctcc.essors·, O..!jen-1-s, ti'Y\ployees,a.l'lcl all persons

Ct~:·\-i,g l" c~~c.er+ with them, +o no+ n.nde..- de.e:ision<; +o no-1-Llill

-\-\,e. p\a.1d1-H'r, '111 Qd.se..9 O'f'. Q,\:),-\ra•y I m~anli!g \~ss., to.pric..lou5,

o.nJ \:iiQS ~10\.tnck

£>. En+er ju.clgMen+ in favor of the p/ainJif~s -for nomin.od,

t.D,'Y\p~ns~-hoq I Ct1'id pur'/1'/-ive. dCUviajes, as alluw~d hy /cv..v, OjC!liJs-f

eac.h ole-l'e.ndant Jjoi"+~ o.nJ several/~.

,

c... E~e1 juJgrntrJ In favor of thi!.. plairrfiffs orclerlng

~~~~nc)._O.nts po,.y th~ t_osh ~ in this SL(.il

'f Onle.r sue}, o..clcl'M-ionetl n.\ie~ u.s this C~Du.d 'fY\IAY d~em

~ust, propt•, cu1cl ~~uii--Ct.h\e..

3B

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 30

CJRTIFICA/f OF SEKVIGE

e91

T 'nere-by
se.rv~c{ +he.

certity tha.t Or) s< 1J..·07
tcre.sc\n9 p\wdinglciocumenf

I h(lVC- n<tc.tiled -fo +h~ foilov.)/h9

pe_rsor0l:

ClerK o~ th Court Altred A. f-Jrrqj U.n,+eo\ Stu+es Ct.\.irthDct&t
90i 19~ Sh-ed, Room Af(!;S
.Denver, CO ~®J..9Y- 3S29

~'>\,., ssfd-, Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 30

1 t)G

FORM850-4A(10/04)

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFENDER GRIEVANCE FORM

oc.f 513/2007 a:J. Com6s C5 ()(.JOt\'{
Grievance Number CSOfi./!17 4a8

STEP (Cih:le One){!) 2 3 ADA? Yes o No o

DATA 2. CLEARLY STATE BASIS FOR GRIEVANCE OR GRIEVANCE APPEAL; 3. STATE SPECIFICALLY WHAT REMEDY YOU ARE REQUESTING; 4. ATTACH A COPY OF PRIOR STEP(S) AND RESPONSES IN GRIEVANCE PROCESS.
Subject of Grievance and Requested Remedy: f"oc '"'"' W 1""" .J..'"< \,..., J...,;,J acm; -h ...,

o~ld '"""''.\:_' '' T"" •yMi"S IS
~{ M,-ti-T~ ~ OJ.x..w. ~ ~ j'l'"

Gt(ccss -~

~ ~SJ~l yo.d Q.J wk'" +ht

o<..o.tJ.,or
we..otlter

e.<•~C:..«., TAe_
j' ~ 1-

Colorado State Penitentiary is a High Security Management Facility and meets ACA Standards in accordance to recreation activities. All offenders are given the allotted amount of time in the exercise area in their day hall. Grievance denied.

INMATE COPY File/AIC
(clinicalandADAonly)
Exh1 bit A

~

RE

1 5 2UU7

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 30

.--· 1'hS\:/ '

co I - X"

FORM 850-4A (10/04)

u I c., N-\, COLORAD(.>O'-DEPA~TMENT OF CORRECTIOI;S OFF~NDER GRIEVANCE FORM

. q l 03 5/22/2007 <D. Com6'
Grievance Number CS06/07-

<!I f\ STEP (Circle One) 1

ADA? Yeso Noo

NAME Dunla , Nathan

DOC NO. 89148

ji~ijtt;i:[y;,';i:JIJJ!:t0'i;i

Instructions: !. FILL OUT IDENTIFYING DATA LEGIBLY IN SPACE PROVIDED;

2. CLEARLY STATE BASIS FOR GRIEVANCE OR GRIEVANCE APPEAL;

3. STATE SPECIFICALLY WHAT REMEDY YOU ARE REQUESTING;

4. ATTACH A COPY OF PRIOR STEP S AND RESPONSES IN GRIEVANCE PROCESS.

D-4-18

DATE: 5- ::t+· t1l+

OFFENDER SIGNATURE / A)cd~,,'·.· -f'e.ro-~ .fJu. .lc.n

As stated in your step I grievance, CSP meets ACA standards in accordance to recreation time. Grievance is denied.

DATE:
Original: Department (clinical and ADA only)
INMATE

1\,f--\ -l Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 3~ 0

lNi 1(
S' [l. ':IC..

DC Fonn ssb:u:iA (12/01/08)

f.!;\ {(>COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFENDER GRIEVANCE FORM ...

No~ OFFENDER MUST COMPLETE: Is this grievance related to your disability/diabetes or other ADA matter? Yes o

CASE MANAGER MUST COMPLETE: Does the offender have an ADA alert? Yes o No(¥.

I '\ Is the subject related to the offender's disabili~diabetic condition or other ADA '!;at~ ~

Date recerved by case manager: l :'512-~

Case Manager:._,(~C"'J~/LI.::.Li<./:J"'--"·S".~l----_.=i!.l.J~=.-----~·

Grievance Number \;_,,S(\O fo"'f =<J(,_)j I

0 STEP (Circle One)

2 3

FILL bUT !DENTIFYING DATA LEGlBLY lN SPACE PROVIDED; CLEARLY STATE BASIS FOR GRJEVANCE OR GRJEVANCE APPEAL; 3. STATE SPECIFICALLY WHAT REMEDY YOU ARE REQUESTING; 4. ATTACH A COPY OF PRJOR STEP(S) AND RESPONSES IN GRJEVANCE PROCESS.

TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFENDER:

l I

\

p< , DATE: / · y' () 9 I OFFENDER SIGNATURE_C··l-\·.ljhw~t~'1\ ,(.~(\:,~V'/~fJD

'· TO BE COMPLETED BY GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR:
RECEIPT: I acknowledge receipt this date of a complaint from the above offender in re2:ard to the following subiect: . \.;( ~ -

.:'l

R r Eal' JAN 0 DATE: ~CEIVEO

I)
J

I

L~vlvffi':JTU~,.r.,T..N~A;M"E "~D'OC~..uc:I;.4Y;E,E'\,

c~~TRACT WO~ER,
', h<i r fnq' VI

OR

OLU~ CNlT·E~E,YR

lD #
ftOCZ

.
0

{)

v

Date ADA J:!;rievance sent to AIC:

i '

RESPONSE Jim Gentile #3608

According to OM# 650-100 (Conditions of Confinement and Q .

.

section A Line 14 states" Shall be allowed a . .

f

uahty ofLJfe), Paragraph IV

day hall five (5) days per week."l 4_42701 mimmum o one hour of recreat'ron r·n an exercr·se area or

Grievance Denied

Jim Gentile # 3608

TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDER

I I DATE GRIEVANCE REC'D BY
'1 ......... .....:t:.k :r,· Gt:.I')T•'/ 8 '7" 6tj RESPONDERtbl- O'l• 0

3~0 RE%~NDER~C EMPLOYE/ CONTRACT WORKER, OR VOLUNTEER SIGNATURE!PR!NT NAME & lD #

>"1\

'i, "'#'

RESPONSE DATE
0 I"0

TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFENDER

RECEIPT: I acknowledge receipt this date of a response from the Department of Corrections, to tb.is grievance.

I lfvou are dissatisfied with the response to this grievance, vou may obt.aln further review bv submitting the next step to the approoriate individual.

DATE:

OFFENDER SIGNATURE/PRINT NAME & DOC#

Original: Department File/AIC
"• '

'/~'0 J0 . ' Copies: Working File, Administrative Head, Offender, Clinical Chart (clinical and ADA only) " "

'l~)(,g_

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 30

si~"{ ~c.

DC Form 850-04A (12/01/08)

~OL RADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFENDERGR1EVANCE FORM

OFFENDER MUST COMPLETE: Is this grievance related to your disability/diabetes or other ADA matter? Yes o

No~-· CASE MANAGER
Is the subject relate

MUST d to the

CoOffMenPdLerE'sTE·s: aDbio!ietsy/tdhieaboefftiecncdoenr dhiativoenaon A~D\AAalDerAt?

Yes o miltter?

Yes o

. No/

I Date received by case manager: i · "Z...Ll:).'

Case ManagerW " .. \ ,t

• D. Combs#4367

D Grievance Number 0~ ()"(~t/ik)}!

STEP (Circle One) 1

No)(

DOC NO. !IN9.

Instructions:

1. FILL OUT IDENTIFYING DATA LEGIBLY IN SPACE PROVIDED;

2. CLEARLY STATE BASIS FOR GRIEVANCE OR GRlEVANCE APPEAL;

3. STATE SPECIFICALLY WHAT REMEDY YOU ARE REQUESTING;

4. ATTACH A COPY OF PRIORSTEP(S) AND RESPONSES IN GRIEVANCE PROCESS.

Subject of Grievance and Requested Meaningful Remedy:

FACILITY/UNIT/POD CSP j) · '1·/

JJ;E BEEA! iff/![ 1-1'1 CS/S;t\/CE !);>;?;/.. ;?'/71r..!{l0l, :S!tvCt: T1f£N~~f

x /3EGN [)ENIE D Dt.F/?JD()R- REO<EllnrAJ/cxe#!C!5 E. o A..JL'}, EM!b !:J r fV!
R;;:~"JUES7!f'f6 IS /-!tC--t'.-SS TO OUT b~o./2 l<6C',Rt:/l7/0N/c-:XERC/SE. +.

Jr:NOW

wHRT OM# ,{,:s--o

-//)0

S/J!j'S

1
-

CltT

.L

1-C::EL

bu~ SHot1.LD 13E

:I /lEN OL1/ DooR. /?~eREATtoN/t:)(EJ<C C/SE. ;-7 Boci;,;r !2E/!b S/-'!!fl!.J!.

'vtNI'tN rVE'ED:s 5wv i/{/ffr 70 .t/!3SoR8£ AJ{)UJ( !Sill! ouR. BoD.!J (v/EDS !

7f/JqrVk. lj 0/A .

Date ADA rievance sent to AIC: RESPONSE

Per AR 600-02 procedure T.4 and AR I 000-01 procedure H states in summary Ad Seg offenders are to be exercised outside their cells and not outside the facility. The CSP program has been approved by the American Correctional Association (ACA) and numerous judicial entities. The program was supported by court ruling when challenged in case no. 93-Z-1976 D. Williams. Outdoor yard is a privilege and as such it is expected that Ad Seg offenders earn (by their conduct) are-class and then a transfer to a facility with access to outdoor yard in addition to many other privileges. Ad Seg offenders housed at CSP will continue to have access to the current recreational area, no changes will be made. Supporting Regulations: AR 100-01 H.; lA 100-01 H.1; AR 600-02 T.4; lA 650-100 A.14. Applicable ACA Standards: 4-4270; 4-4273; 44481.

Carl D. Holditch #2172

TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDER

;- z c, l . r "t c I DATE GRlEVANCE REC'D

.. BY RESPONDER'

~ '1

RES PO~ ()~_,{~~~OR VOLUNTEER SIGNATURE/PRINT NAME

& lD #

-

' TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFENDER

,;

I1·2Zr-J RESPONSE DA;g /

RECEIPT: I acknowledge receipt this date of a response from the Department of Corrections, to this grievance.

I If vou are dissatisfied with the response to this crrievance, vou mav obtain further review bv submitting the next step to the appropriate individual.

DATE:

OFFENDER SIGNATURE/PRlNT NAME & DOC#

Original: Department File/AIC

c{ j Jtp Copies: Working File, Administrative Head, Offender, Clinical Chart (clinical and ADA only)

Attachment " A"
INMATE COPY

(/~ . .L"blJ...
v

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 30 •
DC Form 850-04A (12/01108)
Q~COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFENDER GRIEVANCE FORM
1
OFFENDER MUST COMPLETE: Is this grievance related to your disability/diabetes or other ADA matter? Yes o No)(

CASE MANAGER MUST COMPLETE: Does the offender have an ADA alert? Yes o No /

/

f't Is the subject
Date received

related by case

to the offender's .disability/diabetic condition or

manager: ""-("L{

Case Manager:

o t o rA ~

matter? \..,.._

Yes

o No.QI'" D. Combs#4367

I
Grie,·ance Number \::.,So8"(o'1-0CcJtf

0 STEP (Circle One) 1 2

NAME 11LPA!(o. ;nfl Tr

1 1 ooc No.

o

Instructions:

1. ;JLL OUT IDENTIFYING DATA LEGIBLY li\' SPACE PROVIDED;

2. CLEARLY STATE BASIS FOR GRIEVANCE OR GRIEVANCE APPEAL;

3. STATE SPECIFICALLY WHAT REMEDY YOU ARE REQUESTING;

4. ATTACH A COPY OF PRIOR STEP(S AND RESPONSES IN GRIEVANCE PROCESS.

D. FACILITY/UNIT/POD csp

·~.

TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFENDER:

\

DATE: 2·/· D9

I '\2-0 OFFENDER SIGNATUREC~L\/_YU.:~\.-c-\k ( ~ I . \--:::\'

TO BE COMPLETED BY GRIEVANCE COORDINATOR:
""" RECEIPT: I aclmowled~e receipt this date of a complaint from the above offender in regard to the followino su~~ct:

.'..\rW\~1"- \...O>~Dt\01\

I DATE:

-

~QATURE/F~T NA7!1: J.>OC EMP~E.YEE, CONTRAF;c~RKER, OR VOLUNTEER ID #

rrn n

I

··"-

n

C ~' .""OA

•-~me. Do 1' . ,ff' rf/J<;r

''"""""""
Date ADA t?:rievance sent to AIC: RESPONSE

tf
_.---·· !'.

J

. ... -~-

.

[ TO BE COMPLETED BY RESPONDER

I! DATE GRIEVANCE REC'D BY RESPONDER:

Ij RESPONDER~DOC EMPLOYEE, CONTRACT WORKER, OR VOLUNTEER SJGNATURE!PlUNT 1'\AME & ID #

I RESPONSE DATE:

i

I TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFENDER

RECEIPT: I acknowledge receipt-this date of a response from the Department of Corrections, to this grievance.

I If vou are dissatisfied with the response to this crievance, vou mav obtain further review bv submittino the next step to the approoriate individual.

DATE:

OFFENDER SIGNATURE/PRINT NAME & DOC#

Original: Department FHe/AIC

Copies: Working File, Administrative Head, Offender, Clinical Chart {clinical and ADA only) 8-/.2..0~0_ _ "

Attachment "A"

, I"'

\lU,lslt(l-1.!'

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 21 of 30

STATE OF COLORADO

COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Office of Step 3 Grievance Officer 2862 South Circle Drive, Suite 148 Colorado Springs, CO 80906-4195 Phone: 719.226.4238 Fax: 719.226.4249 Step 3 Grievance Officer
March 19, 2009

Bill Ritter, Jr. Governor
Aristedes W. Zavaras Executive Director

RE: Grievance #CSOB/09-0628

Dear Mr. Matthew Alfaro #11 0191:
I have reviewed your Step 3 grievance that you filed with regard to allegations that your inability to access outdoor recreation is unconstitutional. You requested no remedy in your grievance.
In review of this matter, Administrative Regulation 1000-01 Recreation, states, "H. The DOC shall ensure that offenders in segregation receive a minimum of one hour of exercise, per day, cells, five days per week, unless security or safety considerations dictate otherwise. I. The DOC shall ensure offenders in administrative segregation have ,ac,c,e.,s.,s.....t..o"-'""'"-"'""'"'-""'proqrams and services. [4-4273]
The American Correctional Association, Sixth Edition, Standards for Adult Corrections, states in Standard #4-4270, "Written policy, procedure, and practice provide that inmates in segregation receive a minimum of one hour of exercise per dav outside their cells, five days per week, unless security or safety considerations dictate otherwise. Inmates in segregation should be provided with the opportunity to exercise in an area designated for this purpose, with opportunities to exercise outdoors, weather permitting, unless security or safety considerations dictate otherwise. A written record should be kept of each inmate's participation in the exercise program. Reasons for the imposition of constraints should be documented." Policy #4-4273 states, "Written policy, procedure, and practice provide that inmates in administrative segregation and protective custody have access to programs and services that services that include, but are not limited to, the following: educational services, commissary services, library services, social services, counseling services, religious guidance, and recreational programs. Although services and programs cannot be identical to those provided to the general population, there should be no major differences for reasons other than
danger to life, health, or safety. Inmates in administrative segregation and protective custody should
have the opportunity to receive treatment from professionals such as social workers, psychologists, counselors, and psychiatrists. The standard also applies to inmates held in disciplinary detention far more than 60 days."
As an offender assigned to an Administrative Segregation facility, CSP, you receive the minimum of one hour of exercise per day outside your cell. Outdoor recreation is afforded to offenders not housed in Administrative Segregation at CSP. Your demonstration of appropriate behavior will affect your classification score and earn your placement at a less secure facility where outdoor recreation is available.
It is your burden to prove the allegations stated in your Step 3 grievance. I have reviewed the facts of this case and determined that you did not meet this burden. You claim you are unconstitutionally being denied outdoor recreation, however, there was no corroborating evidence to provide proof of your allegations.

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 22 of 30
Page2 Matthew Alfaro #110191: Grievanoe #CSOB/09-0628
As you requested no remedy, none can be granted. This is the final administrative response in this matter and you have exhausted your administrative remedies. Enclosed please find the following copies of all the materials you provided to me in support of the grievance that you filed: Step 1 Grievance, Step 2 Grievance, and Step 3 Grievance.
Anthony A DeCesaro Grievance Officer
Cc: working file grievance file Tom KoUe, Offender Records

• Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 23 of 30
rN \1-\'e UNne~ ~\Ale'S ~~~RI.C\ CO\W-T FOR T \Ae' ~~ )1\l-,\CT 6"f- C6lD~t:::{:;>
v.
/\Rl 1-P.\lf<.~S, -~f\c\<\{\diJ.Qll~ , QJ\0. -.~ \\tS ot-f1m\ Q.~CkCi-l'-\ o.s,. \Jte__c~-;_\]12..- tY,(e_c.--\bC 1 ~,at
t&~l{'tclC>Jt\-s.
DBCU\AA\\DN b"f bi\RNe~ U,~wis f~'elt~
bt\RN8LL. LeN\( fR-t:"lCJW
c !P.~r colMa..Q\J s:-~u~ fU\I~cU'i' ~~ CA f'l\.0--)t, ..'l\uJ'f\
'E'*'-·"f c-"

~·':)

{'((J?ff .-.m;u/i''>

c:n ' ~CJm ''+~)3~ J:dq\JJdlc(J U\o · "-'tn v\li[D) ~'0 ff"Jt'YYYJ~/1 r · 1~011~~ hiD P -\S¥-\ 11\.\+ '-'-\-· t--~nn1o tY\tO ~J\+ 51
bVIJ'f\Q \PJ- 0\H- +0\-\-\· \---. m\.JCd .:}!\ /--.~\~ ~ ? YD\10\J -I_

)or \'\) ·J0\1-POJ G;'\)'.t~-;,1>
~\'1 \.1'0\f\-\:

J9)~r;w;u111?n\:'f<\l ~

fO\\+- ~ ~v~-;.~

1 '(llf'p ,P~)J.
-\'iJ

o :ro Cl1'\
~\)j w

)' -.fi\1..\-t ~-\- 1 \YQVJS "~ ~ -.)!\J \\)ex) f \1"\\JYI ~L

j 'LSYI')o h \> \J 1• ~W'D\ hJD p S-',lr\Y)\J~cn JD '\Jn- ~))fl

hvo ~

~"l-\-15-<1 o J1N.. \J\W\}JOJ -[_ h""\~
t;,~ L I '#~Oj~J\1.)0 ~-T ~0,~

>\l\\1 · '(W\)-\-S !O(JUY\ )7
WD 1. h~M ;l'{lt;t-

~r-~C; '6\'f'\ ~\'<1 0~ no"- " -owl)) 0\\-\: ';;\i\'0\llftJ Jil\fi';UQ

Q\.\"\- rt'G\ 1STW\-t· \llJ~{I)S \'. f('OqD 0J!<\DV\ af'I'\1V\ j:

· 'dS':t:u:n :x'd J\:ll '(JW w!'0)'dnoJ \)fi!J\-t>'e ~ 0'\~'0 \..nnq \\IV
hv oi"D"\ --r l ()~ ~ df'Y.M, 1- 0)\J',~ '\.q\l1. 1 \~0.~ ~

"1-t-()~ ~+ vQorn 'Qdf\WrD 1: -~~'\~.soj- )~-\- \JI. vrnVI '0\\fQ\.\

W5\\-\" JO )\1.S IJVD 1\Y\cru rmh (~~! \J'n- ~Vl1o\1 J~ ~"'Dm

- fl)YV\ 'J.r'OO\ )\"ln'V) -t . '1Jfl hw 'f f)~d~D ~~\'(4 \j~:~

+\ . (J\fO. 'i')\l/lfJ'1) <:J ~\'\':J

~ J(} f..:\'i'"'~ )~-\-'1\l._M S:\J0'1\'1)'0)

}1 )nJV\W:IY'-' "D ~ 5)nl\\\') \.IJ. )6\Y'~Sl\.J\, ~)1\\'\'1'\ V\l):UJ f--+~Jm"JS,

n 01\;o/1

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 24 of 30

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 25 of 30
~~ 1\-\S U""'UE"D STA:\ED b\'C:\\R"L~\ LD\l ILT
FDK -roc u"LSTRI--L-\ ot- CD\DRt\tn

NA:T\-\1\N CS'S\ZA-Rt> buN\.-fA\) E.A- !\\.-.
v\ Ail'-1-t.l F1==Sl

\] .

<

'

ARr ZA\JA\2J\S ti'Jb\Vi blll:-\-~ 1 A-Nb \N \-hS DrHCJA\.--

CAPI\C_\-\-\j Ptco E~ec_u-t\\JE D\QEL-ro\(., £-\-- t\\,.

b~R:-1'-..\t>t:\~.

Mc:\-IT\-\EW ~RAN'SISLO AL~A'eD \-\tRb5'-1 bSCLAQES:

. l wA-'S R£:C\E\JE:U p,.-\ (C:;S·P) LDLDQ.AbD sTA-n::,

% I N11-iA\\E1~:I'JNT\OATR.U~DDNNDAPR0\\A}.\_-.T-D1O.4D-rQ;»..

2KD.'DClUP<..E6A1TNICOJ~::;

-rt-lt:?N
OI'Jt£,

C-S? \S A 6l.-lPBIZM A'i VRtSD!'>J tt--..1 W\hC:\-\ 5\JeKY A'S?ECT

of' M~
\>LAC£D

\.,\f6 t'S CoN-r'i2.o\..U;u At-Ju \\e{2..E t:\-r CCZ::>? 'bELAllSE::

MD\'J\TDR.E::D.:riAJPr-"5
D\- EE'AA\l \D9- w\-W_£

-\-\-o~D IN -n-\'2, WJ;;LD GD!.A__NT':\ Tt'\\ \.--· I WA-'6 lbLD

• Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 26 of 30

• Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 27 of 30

A5 'EE:SN rJ\18<.. FoR \Ali:£~ . SD \Ao\1\J CAN ::c

\)l<£"i=£N\ P.N\{) 1:;\J IDE~CE OiZ_ AQ.Gv\1\lEt-..\TS IN Mlj

F 1\ \l
1 1'-..J "-JD ·\We,

\wDCK\?\D\.~t\-M\JL\\--IlMVJ\I"S0\\T1J\.TJ'UK\EJtc\-EGEA'6.?\\.)\t(D\~):\W:G\£\CE\ ..M.D..~ \.SSm\DN~ D\f\""D2~" :c,_?'\"A'"(\\."L£-tln:~£L\':1?S12\-:M\>\E'?~\b\S"D\-S-F~ DI=.. D'K

::::c. bE c._LAR. ~ Ut--1 ttQ. ~s".H~\....IL1 o~ \)E(<.YuJ(. \j \thC\-1

-n-\'8 FDKBb.D1 NG. \ S 1\2-U.\. S A"'-'>b CDR.£ EGT \D \We

ts\3'0\ Dt: M\\ KNo\f\1\J:::.Db.S. f)(EC..Uit b ~T ·n-tE

C..O\..DRADD
No\IGM..~

sm"\E \/EN \4'~ 2oo~.

\TEN\IAR~
1"-.l LAND~

ON
ClnJ 1

c..D.

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 28 of 30
' '
T,YTHE U.NJTE.t) STAf£5 IJJSiRitT COI.-\RI FOR 'THE
DISTR..JCT Or COlOR.AIJO
NAn-tAN f)ur~LAP, d. al.,
v. ARI ZAVt9/U!S I iN,~Iv,cJIAC<,'fJ arvcl iN hh ornue;/ tc,pt:.Lily G<S
f .xeciAL'Jt (hrcdor, el, Cil.

DEC LA R.A T I ON OF RYfiN fV\E RR1 TT,

/i~w;"'j 5alrsf;eof 14 Cri-/erlc.. lo
vfelel/11ttlftcJ :r will 6e re!u;;c~ecl a I

fl05tess
a Zeve{

-lo
¥

a JeveL
fc,o Uy

JSl fo.ul,)y 1 /1 WM
(flv~:v;~/rc,f, ve 5fjltjti1iuf'l,

cs.r) lrJ,)e(,Nc.fely For Sv.splc.cN IJf 5TG, (secv.r•+,,1f..rev~ Grc..cy) f,vv.·lve.J'nt.A,

(..la,~i,Jj fY\'1 N~fl'J~ Wt;,s fowvc! ,',v lk f05SC.Sto/J o.f cwof/..ir orfer~Jer.

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 29 of 30
v• '

:I rec._·,.;_ve_c) rvo ,vo ine of t/,-15 u!leJ~'ticN, f'Jor """' ::r: prcJ'v,ded a.
h.~<r,tJj C<'> re~w·re,-). 1 JVC'f OrJiy by Letw 1 lo"-1 Ctbo ~y Cnoc..'s owrJ Glo.ssi(;c"'-/,cN pf"cC-e.eclum Per !U<- # C.,()O-O;Z (iv){:.r) ( 1)

f!r), hO!Vi).lly I f/.{re. is iN $1A((/cieNI_ .[i)lcietVCe lo 5"ffDrl c 00C5 tAte/ 5Jo,v f (; reki.v
me. lrJ !ltitnl.o/i51mlvt Se)'e,j'alioN (!IdS'].) )ee. koci-. v Le.w.s, q& r-; s"'ff 2N,,{ Cflflj

(o. !Jr,z. 2ooo) (ev,Jwu. NtedetA fo CD,vh'"'"e- i,.;M"'Ies -lo (nG>Xirr.ufrl saur,ly FrisoN for

~~-"i"{J', at(,l."utlo.v fl'lus+ lv:.ve_5o;-"e. ,·"~c-./ief[J. of rd<C<kL/-y 1o Sn+,s{y o/v.e precess).

G;;J,.vu.eJ. fhce/11eNI,N IU S;_t- /6_, CJ.trre.vl or_ receN! STG ly fl(/1 .,, !Mf/,cal-es a Neeci fc. ptD<IIdt 5ufe.fy O.Nd f',of fk. prc;c,ver i·, Ct '' pc,ri-/c<A/t;.ry dc,rv,yuocd persoN: 11 II-&
5wpreme. ('.owf e.slc.bt,s~ed fM...f whtv ,/ C.OtVIe5 fo ~cd(uvCi"J cwe'i (iherfy IN"/ertsts
w:H·qf<i ti-t. 5uuerNrne...As resiAlC<}o~y ,'rJierr>l /,..; ScJefy I {/ fiOOf of dcuverDV<StJtSS ,, {YIIAs-1 bt s~rorlecl 6y ([ Cteor cwcl to;v(/,J'.)Li::J ivideNa." Zadvydos v, IJ""'~I 533 \J\-S- b78~

L>4o (zoot) See CliSo, /LoCI;, v- Lewd q~, r; 5"'ff 2,...,1 Ct/ q&s-&& ( tvor '5 f/.Ne aw <'Xf"/4Nqfk·V

us h wl..y fk J,.,c,l"cl- pt,Nftd L·~+ Fou,vcf OMUij fk ro5SC90N"5 of ·fwo Fellow iN(YlC<fes are..

S<Af?, cici'/1 fo (1)./se (}N NfltAe~Vct of !<oct 'J mept6etXA'f '"" tJ..e !?tyt~!V /3fiJfkrtMcl

alSo J''V(,f>) ·ff,c,J fJ..:_ Us!

j',vf:../lftdtd f/.,t_ N'<MfS Qwcf, fJ\QNe NiAf'l. beiJ of i;J0(r<t>.Af, J...ispcu•v> CS 1aNJ

perso~>~5 ,/..te!ltec/ /,I;Vfdule.l lo 5Yc, ae /; v· ly

ST8TEmavT OF LJGEfUY INTER.t>T

!Je+ef'.lfiON ,'A] ( SP I rV''f('':,t5 oh-;pru;/ {J.i.vcl >j,vlh (q'!-/- htAibl 5hrl (!rJ ./11<- I rJ

relr1lrc'.v fo ·!f..e.. Orr/,'NC!ry ;r.;Uc!tr-~1> of f'l/50111 l.r(e, t,JV.id" nsr~ fo L< L&er-ly

ns ru lr.Jt(lesf. 5et- lv.//::,:vSoJJ V.· IJ~.ts/,,v I

S-Ci. 23YL/ f7_ocJ")

CuM'.ftf, DIV!; /hf C5P

aa.. rV<o,r~ rest(lt/-, vt. f!-.eN -li.o-;e- fou.vcl fo iYVIp/,t£1 k o Liberty i.vftres+ ~I' tk

(our-!- /c1 ;f,,~fuv v. /v,//c.1 ;v>{!'~ l~il F 5"!'/' 2.! 71'7, 7'1/-t;z (!V.I). IJiftO 2-oQ)J

!/! (), tive.J IV tttc,/,/-1, Or lf>S, I Coulc-1 Au.ve. _ou.f,(Mf' re.cre~,~~c.v For 4/- L{n'>f

fiAJu · huvJJ f'e' clar IN C')(J, I Cim L.""rleci lo _O>ve;l'i.'i.Ar S f,nes ti wee/c.. of _

re.c.re(,IJ,·v;.,~ '"' a U 1< (c;o+ eel( ~,ff.. O;vly C< pull "'f 64,: No {;t.d:/ocy recreaftoN 1 5

fii/'VIJI/1:"'( lN c. Level IV f&.ut.f.;· ' (}{ L~:-<s1 .J... eoc,lrJ J>rwcf ?lff!Oxitnt).fely leAl AO&tl5

Ct day oul or fl1'j Cell Ill L'5P ::r/>1 CoN(,Ne.£1 fo fYlj f:..e/{ cd Leos-/ 23 f...ou.rs

pa c1.v.y_ Set~ /h,J;N v, W.l/k..ir.Jsa-_v (""·{<p(lv.,.J..io.vcF y~l'<.-{ I•MI!-fMpG~;~ fNc';)'h.- oF C1

Aurcrf>Ar_
\J, W!JriA,

fo f&~.u.Uy os Ci Co;vs!J"'Ii'o,v<'</fy f'"'fechd
e/2& F, s,_,('f /3~'/ ( resJ,,d,otv5 O,v oul-cAoc-r

liber'f /,v/lres-1- )J 5c< q/so fti.l.ltr
e.xe;cise.. C.vtVI~;Heci. "viH-. Lo,~J

+en"s o-f locrc-iN l;,.,.,es /5 "'"-'co;vsJ,-/._,j;,;';J<II) fY!ore O<Hr; loo {j}/Le.. s·urv5h/"'e. expc>utt-

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 4 Filed 05/26/09 USDC Colorado Page 30 of 30

t\fl!d uac.se Leuve'> recplt, pre/~ f.; ho~e -_UC<ck<'.v,) os+wpuro;/:> {j(((j;;J,'NJ to
nt{N+ WI teL Cc; I s+...cl, 1.~' /1-.L. hooly Ccwf Cl~Sur~ CO!/Uv.IV\ Q!Jt-1 ~\C<rchrJ bc<VeS
wrtkO&t+ vI ~C<.M l'l\l [) wJl fj,r()~v.re.- f6 )L<!V ,~,M 6y c. roct$5 fk,.f &-wV bL /)((6i'<fli\hl(A Gy VlfoW!"V (\ '7v.pp1<rntNf5: /M(/~;,~,vally ;'J05oN·tr5 ,,.; c.J,sey- tAI't rJof- recitvi~J Vr t"'"'" v tl Sv.ppf t~5 jf'J flvu cA!'d-s-
li.f a LeveJ IV tuc.d,ty, or Less, I wc~dd he- el•j ,hit hr f(N cl/},ys o- fl'1u,vfk turNccl- {tMe..-J ] n-ns-- 'ID'iJ I). f..:# q5'0 01 (r). khi/i- 1.\f CSP, :r ,)0 ,0 'j re.Utve. O.Ny
_eu~Ned- },Me- wkrr..k Uvev,fc;bl,l i.vutu.se-s 1k- dCArcrtr'o;J 0I; MY SeNftNC."-, R1~1h. f k
'>h.Jv./t J'UtS fk r.'o-5e.. tVJU.N1AJe• fh. ckstrthcrv fo 5ro.tvl1 will-.. hole{ or re<,ton'.. t'ui'NI'd-
i+ hM{,-, ff..uf drscre f· ""'. fYIIAY ;vuf he- i/lbw~td Nor ,., Sv1i'Jtc/ lo o.r hitrary !ANtA to.prici~ws
U.pp[,:ec,/luJI). fJ.<.- 5jM·,f of fie_ '5fCifule /S ){ C1 pri>OMtr r~yr(SSf'>1 k '34Ji1/d h~ /)/tlrJ/eclfk. li/Vie erect I. ·17t_· E/!0/\Jeov.s Jec l>;oAI -tktf dij!!lves 0 prl'so:,nr !'>f MIS
Op('er/uiV'l'l fo pro.Jress M+ec.ts fkcl.tc/sioAJ w~tkr +c .9rCc;Jf or t.v;tk \--.old. earJeJ-F,~e-,

fJI"' Lwei /II .fi,(i/t/y1 or Less; J C.OLA/c( h.trl\} !Yilf Ct/1-l'J.t-..1; 0{{. /JI C<:.P J am

lXpry,ec-f -h {fjj,)i"J IN fVIY, cell JJ/ ADUI'5 per d{).y' Ses. Le !J1cdrt: v- /)'}Ctr;.se..l 7'15

x+ r-s"'fr· 1>).3, l,3(p (f).6t<.Nrt!) [7..'-/-hout Lt// UJirli"J, ~ UIVC.ON>IffvJ.:o.vqL),

ki~

Gc.c-/V rcporh,;,/ +1-«/ Jl1t/IA./o,vuJ olot5 Nol prul<-tcL irJ ·~ load,; iAM.-,/f/' SucJ,. 2'1- hour

k L~JhJ-/,.,) C.orvclrl!u.v5.. !fle(q /trd.V 15 IV'Uol~J /i141•V/-c.l:v & IM/11'1/V'f- 5y5/em.

()JJ;/,crJi{/ly' cJ:.._;,,,F.j•Nj 1'1\G C<~. (;.N 5TG.- OH'fNoler iN of ikdf' ueutfts 0 Li':l<r~y 1;v/-tre~t os ti1!Ac/.. )uch. 0- C/a5Sih'cq};<-•!V (a14,~cs mL,mt fo he E~,'6k -16r
c f'O)'d•,sst·-v, 1'''1.F.'r:ttn-n--vjI cwcl tClr/Vtcl-f/;>7{.. ()) off" f pn; ON-tT) i~>S'> I I tc.{ fc
fleA, 5":;, Sa, /), !2 =f:l=. 1960 -0'7 (I v) (f3) {2)

l oie..dCtt'e... 1.molu feNC<.I~ oF paj"'~'Y rh<~+ tk-- .fon:-5, l: ;:"j' i5 -irv.-e_ o.rvcl tome+ 1u 11-e- best- 6~' fY<Y kNotvLto!Je..- ExeC.iAlecJ O.f G/Vr)lv Crh , CoLo rc..do O;v

IVoL·UV~~u II 266c~

'

I

0

 
 Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01196-CMA-MEH NATHAN JERARD DUNLAP
Plaintiff, v. ARISTEDES W. ZAVARAS, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the
Colorado Department of Corrections, Defendant.
THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT
INTRODUCTION For nearly fourteen years, the Colorado Department of Corrections (CDOC) has denied Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap regular outdoor exercise, in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The CDOC has incarcerated Mr. Dunlap in Colorado’s “supermax” prison, the Colorado State Penitentiary (CSP), nearly continuously since Mr. Dunlap was sentenced to death on May 17, 1996. (The only instances when Mr. Dunlap has been allowed outside since May 1996 were when he was transferred from CSP to other detention facilities on a handful of occasions for brief periods of time for medical or legal reasons.) During the lengthy time periods that Mr. Dunlap has been incarcerated at CSP, the

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 9
CDOC has not allowed any CSP inmates, including Mr. Dunlap, to exercise outdoors. Instead, CSP provides inmates with the opportunity to exercise only in a “day room” that is part of the CSP building. The CSP “day room” has a floor, a ceiling, and four walls. Inmates placed in the “day room” are not outside.
Defendant Aristedes W. Zavaras, the Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections, has incarcerated and continues to incarcerate Mr. Dunlap at CSP, not due to any conduct by Mr. Dunlap during his incarceration, but instead pursuant to the CDOC’s policy of incarcerating all inmates on Colorado’s “death row” at CSP. Through this policy and practice of depriving Mr. Dunlap of regular outside exercise, Defendant has acted with deliberate indifference to Mr. Dunlap’s physical and mental health. Defendant knew and continues to know that he is consigning Mr. Dunlap to many years as a “death row” inmate incarcerated at CSP without being allowed to exercise outside, and Defendant disregarded and continues to disregard the substantial risks that this long-term deprivation of outdoor exercise poses to human health and well being.
Mr. Dunlap seeks injunctive and declaratory relief for this violation of his Eighth Amendment right to be free from cruel and unusual punishments.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. This Court has original jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1343 over Plaintiff’s cause of action arising under the U.S. Constitution and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988, and pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202.
2

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 9
2. Venue lies in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado because a substantial part of the events and omissions giving rise to Mr. Dunlap’s claim occurred within the District of Colorado. 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b)(2).
PARTIES 3. Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap is, and at all times relevant to this action has been, a “death row” inmate incarcerated by the CDOC. 4. Defendant Aristedes W. Zavaras, the Executive Director of the CDOC, operates the State of Colorado’s correctional facilities where Mr. Dunlap is, and at all times relevant to this action has been, incarcerated. As the Executive Director of the CDOC, Defendant is responsible for both the policy and the practice that has resulted in Mr. Dunlap being incarcerated at CSP without outdoor exercise for years at a time, as described in this Third Amended Complaint. All of Defendant’s acts and omissions alleged in this Third Amended Complaint have been and are being carried out under color of state law. Defendant is sued in his official capacity.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND 5. Mr. Dunlap was sentenced to death by a Colorado court on May 17, 1996. 6. As a matter of policy of the CDOC under Defendant’s leadership, all “death row” inmates, regardless of prison conduct, are housed at CSP.
3

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 9
7. Pursuant to this policy, the CDOC sent Mr. Dunlap to CSP on May 22, 1996, with the expectation that Mr. Dunlap would remain at CSP as long as he was on “death row.”
8. When Mr. Dunlap was sent to CSP, the CDOC knew that Mr. Dunlap would likely serve at least ten years of incarceration at CSP, given the protracted process of appeals and postconviction challenges afforded in capital cases.
9. CSP is a Level V security correctional institution, which is the highest security level that exists within the CDOC.
10. CSP is an administrative segregation facility of the CDOC. 11. During all times relevant to this action, the CDOC has not allowed inmates incarcerated at CSP, including Mr. Dunlap, to exercise outside. 12. The CDOC has incarcerated Mr. Dunlap at CSP as a death row inmate nearly continuously since May 22, 1996. Since that date, the only instances when the CDOC has allowed Mr. Dunlap outside were when Mr. Dunlap was transferred from CSP to other detention facilities on a handful of occasions for brief periods of time for medical or legal reasons. On these occasions when Mr. Dunlap was briefly incarcerated at nonCSP facilities, Mr. Dunlap was allowed to exercise outside, without incident. 13. Upon information and belief, Mr. Dunlap has been continuously incarcerated at CSP since September 2007.
4

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 9
14. During all times relevant to this action, instead of allowing inmates incarcerated at CSP, including Mr. Dunlap, to exercise outside, the CDOC has provided CSP inmates the opportunity to exercise only in a “day room” that is part of the CSP building. The CSP “day room” has a floor, a ceiling, and four walls. Mr. Dunlap has not been outside when he has been in the CSP “day room.”
15. During the extended periods of time that the CDOC has incarcerated Mr. Dunlap at CSP, Mr. Dunlap has not received any unfiltered, natural sunlight on his skin, and no unfiltered, natural sunlight has entered his pupils. During these periods of time, Mr. Dunlap has not felt the wind, nor rain, nor snow.
16. Long-term deprivation of the opportunity to be outside such as the CODC has inflicted on Mr. Dunlap poses a substantial risk of serious harm to mental and physical health.
17. Defendant knew and continues to know that his acts and omissions in preventing Mr. Dunlap from engaging in regular outdoor exercise over extended periods of time pose a substantial risk of serious harm to Mr. Dunlap’s mental and physical health.
18. Absent a change in CDOC policy or an injunction issued by this Court, Defendant will continue to incarcerate Mr. Dunlap at CSP, with exceptions only for brief trips to other detention facilities for medical or legal reasons, for as long as he remains on “death row,” regardless of his prison conduct.
5

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 9
19. Absent a change in CDOC practice or an injunction issued by this Court, Defendant will continue to prevent CSP inmates, including Mr. Dunlap, from exercising outside.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF (42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1988) 20. Plaintiff hereby incorporates paragraphs 1-19 of this Third Amended Complaint. 21. Defendant, through his acts and omissions as set forth in this Third Amended Complaint, has violated and continues to violate Mr. Dunlap’s right to be free from cruel and unusual punishments under the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. Defendant is the Executive Director of a state agency who has acted under color of state law and knew and continues to know that preventing Mr. Dunlap from engaging in regular outdoor exercise over extended periods of time poses a substantial risk of serious harm to Mr. Dunlap’s mental and physical health. Defendant has acted and continues to act with deliberate indifference in denying Mr. Dunlap regular outside exercise for extended periods of time. 22. An actual and immediate controversy exists between Plaintiff and Defendant. Plaintiff contends that the challenged policy and practice violates his constitutional rights. Defendant contends that the challenged policy and practice comply with the law. Plaintiff is therefore entitled to a declaration of rights with respect to this
6

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 9
controversy. Without such a declaration, Plaintiff will be uncertain of his rights and Defendant will be uncertain of his responsibilities under the law.
23. Plaintiff is entitled to injunctive relief. Defendant has enforced and is enforcing the challenged policy and practice against Plaintiff. Defendant has acted and continues to act under color of state law to deprive Plaintiff of his constitutional rights. As a result of the existence, operation, and implementation of the challenged policy and practice, Plaintiff has suffered irreparable injury due to the past violation of his constitutional rights and is suffering a real and immediate threat of continuing irreparable injury due to the ongoing violation of his constitutional rights. Plaintiff has no plain, adequate, or speedy remedy at law.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests that this Court grant him the following relief: (a) Adjudge and declare that the acts, omissions, policies, and conditions described above are in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, which grant constitutional protection to Plaintiff. (b) Permanently enjoin Defendant from subjecting Plaintiff to the unconstitutional and unlawful acts, omissions, policies, and conditions described above; (c) Award Plaintiff the costs of this suit, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and litigation expenses pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988;
7

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 9
(d) Retain jurisdiction of this case until Defendant has fully complied with the orders of this Court, and there is a reasonable assurance that Defendant will continue to comply in the future absence continuing jurisdiction; and
(e) Award such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
DATED this 8th day of March, 2010. Respectfully submitted,
s/ Gail K. Johnson______ Gail K. Johnson, Esq. Johnson & Brennan, PLLC 1401 Walnut Street, Suite 201 Boulder, Colorado 80302 Telephone: (303) 444-1885 Facsimile: (866) 340-8286 gjohnson@johnson-brennan.com Cooperating Attorney with the ACLU Foundation of Colorado
s/ Mark Silverstein______ Mark Silverstein, Esq. Legal Director ACLU Foundation of Colorado 400 Corona Street Denver, Colorado 80218 ATTORNEYS FOR NATHAN DUNLAP
8

Case 1:09-cv-01196-WJM-MEH Document 59 Filed 03/12/10 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 9
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 8th day of March, 2010, I electronically filed the foregoing THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to the following via email: Chris W. Alber Assistant Attorney General Civil Litigation & Employment Law Section 1525 Sherman Street, 7th Floor Denver, CO 80203 chris.alber@state.co.us
_____s/Gail K. Johnson _____
9

 
 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 09-cv-01196-BNB

FILE 0
UN!TED STATES DISTRICT COURT [)~t~h~~r~.. CO~ fJR.AOO

NATHAN JERARD DUNLAP, MATTHEW FRANSISCO ALFARO, and RYAN MERRITT,

JUL 0 9 2009
GREGOh:Y C. LANGHAM
CLERK

Plaintiffs,

V.
ARISTEDES ZAVARAS, individually, and in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections,
SUSAN JONES, individually, and in her official capacity as the Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary,
D. COMBS, whose true name is unknown, individually, and in his official capacity as a hearing committee member,
K. MOORE, whose true name is unknown, individually, and in her official capacity as a hearing committee member, and
J. OLSON, whose true name is unknown, individually, and in his official capacity as hearing committee chairperson,

Defendants.

ORDER TO DISMISS IN PART AND DENYING MOTIONS

Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, and Ryan Merritt initiated this action by filing prose "Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction," a "Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction," "Plaintiffs' Notice of Associated Cases," "Plaintiffs' Motion Requesting Class Action Certification," and a "Prisoners Complaint." Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap also filed on his own "Plaintiffs' Motion Requesting an Order in Regards to the Payment of Filing Fee," "Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Counsel," and a "Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S. C. Section 1915." Plaintiff Matthew

Fransisco Alfaro filed on his own a "Prisoner's Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915." In an order filed on May 26, 2009, Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland directed the clerk of the Court to commence a civil action and directed Plaintiffs to cure certain deficiencies if they wish to pursue their claims in this action. More specifically, Magistrate Judge Boland ordered Plaintiffs to file the complaint and in forma pauperis motions on the proper forms. Magistrate Judge Boland also ordered Plaintiff Ryan Merritt to submit an individual motion seeking leave to proceed in forma pauperis together with a certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement. Plaintiffs were warned that any named Plaintiff who fails to cure the designated deficiencies within thirty days would be dismissed as a party to this action.
On June 17, 2009, Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap and Matthew Francisco Alfaro each filed on the proper forms a Prisoner Complaint and a Prisoner's Motion and
Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff Ryan Merritt has
not responded to Magistrate Judge Boland's May 26 order in any way. Therefore, Plaintiff Ryan Merritt will be dismissed as a party to this action for failure to cure the deficiencies.
The Court also will address some of the pending motions in this action. The Court must construe the motions liberally because Plaintiffs are not represented by an attorney. See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972); Hall v. Be/lmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (1oth Cir. 1991 ). However, the Court should not be an advocate for prose litigants. See Hall, 935 F.2d at 1110.
2

The Court first will address "Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction." As noted above, Plaintiffs also have filed a "Memorandum of Law in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction." A party seeking a preliminary injunction must show a substantial likelihood of prevailing on the merits, that he will suffer irreparable injury unless the injunction issues, that the threatened injury outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause the opposing party, and that the injunction, if issued, would not be adverse to the public interest. See Lundgrin v. Claytor, 619 F.2d 61, 63 (1oth Cir. 1980).
Plaintiffs are challenging the conditions of their confinement in administrative segregation at the Colorado State Penitentiary. One of the claims Plaintiffs raise is an Eighth Amendment claim in which Plaintiffs allege they are being subjected to cruel and unusual punishment because they have been denied any opportunity for outdoor exercise for an extended period of time. In the motion for a preliminary injunction, Plaintiffs seek an order directing Defendants to provide them with at least one hour of outdoor exercise per day, five times a week.
Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate that they will suffer irreparable injury due to the denial of outdoor exercise if the Court does not enter a preliminary injunction in this action. Therefore, the motion for a preliminary injunction will be denied.
The Court next will address "Plaintiffs' Motion Requesting Class Action Certification." Plaintiffs ask the Court to certify this action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because their claims are common to all of the approximately 750 inmates at the Colorado State Penitentiary. The motion for class certification will be denied because Plaintiffs, who are not represented by counsel,
3

may not represent other prose litigants in federal court, see 28 U.S.C. § 1654, and are

not adequate class representatives for a putative class action. See Fymbo v. State

Farm Fire &Cas. Co., 213 F.3d 1320, 1321 (101h Cir. 2000). The Court is aware that

Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap also has filed "Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of

Counsel." That motion will be denied because, at this stage of the proceedings, the

request for appointment of counsel is premature. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff Ryan Merritt is dismissed as a party to this action for

failure to cure the deficiencies. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that "Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction" (docket

#7) filed on May 26, 2009, is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that "Plaintiffs' Motion Requesting Class Action

Certification" (docket #5) filed on May 26, 2009, is denied. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that "Plaintiffs' Motion for Appointment of Counsel"

(docket #9) filed on May 26, 2009, is denied as premature.

Ji DATED at Denver, Colorado, lhis day of

~

'2009.

BY THE C URT:

Zl A L. WEINSHIENK, Senior Judge ited States District Court

4

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
CERTIFICATE OF MAILING
Civil Action No. 09-cv-01196-BNB
Nathan Jerard Dunlap Prisoner No. 89148 Colorado State Penitentiary PO Box777 Canon City, CO 81215- 0777
Matthew Fransisco Alfaro Prisoner No. 110191 Colorado State Penitentiary PO Box 777
Canon City, co 81215-0777
Ryan Merritt Prisoner No. 96531 Colorado State Penitentiary PO Box 777 Canon City, CO 81215-0777
. . . I hereby ccrtl'fy !bthat I have mailed a copy of the Order to the above-named
1nd1v1duals on._i__.,'PJ.L--.e!.1R"""'-..__-

 
 Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 1 of 10
ALLMTN,TERMED
U.S. District Court District of Colorado (Denver) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:09−cv−01196−WJM−MEH

Dunlap et al v. Zavaras et al Assigned to: Judge William J. Martinez Referred to: Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 05/26/2009 Date Terminated: 08/04/2011 Jury Demand: Both Nature of Suit: 555 Prisoner − Prison Condition (U.S. not a defendant) Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Nathan Jerard Dunlap

represented by Gail Kathryn Johnson Johnson Brennan &Klein, PLLC 1470 Walnut Street Suite 101 Boulder, CO 80302 303−444−1885 Fax: 866−340−8286 Email: gjohnson@jbk−law.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Mark Silverstein American Civil Liberties Union−Denver 303 East 17th Street Suite 350 Denver, CO 80203 303−777−5482 Fax: 303−777−1773 Email: msilver2@att.net ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Rebecca Teitelbaum Wallace American Civil Liberties Union−Denver 303 East 17th Street Suite 350 Denver, CO 80203 303−777−5482 Fax: 303−777−1773 Email: rtwallace@aclu−co.org ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Matthew Fransisco Alfaro TERMINATED: 02/19/2010

Plaintiff
Ryan Merritt TERMINATED: 07/09/2009

V.
Defendant
Aristedes (I) Zavaras individually TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber Colorado Attorney General's Office Ralph L. Carr Colorado Judicial Center 1300 Broadway Denver, CO 80203 720−508−6612 Fax: 720−508−6032

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 2 of 10

Email: chris.alber@state.co.us

Defendant
Aristedes Zavaras in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Corrections

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)
Edward T. Farry , Jr. Edward Farry, Law Office of 214 East Dale Street #210 Colorado Springs, CO 80903−4729 719−578−2000 Fax: 719−578−1794 Email: efarry@farry.net ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Susan (I) Jones individually TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)

Defendant
Susan Jones in her official capacity as the Warden of the Colorado State Penitentiary TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)

Defendant
D. (I) Combs individually TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)

Defendant
D. Combs whose true name is unknown, in his official capacity as a hearing committee member TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
K. (I) Moore individually TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)

Defendant
K. Moore whose true name is unknown, in her official capacity as a hearing committee member TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)

Defendant
J. (I) Olson individually TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)

Defendant
J. Olson whose true name is unknown, in his

represented by Christopher Wayne Alber (See above for address)

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 3 of 10
official capacity as a hearing committee member TERMINATED: 03/16/2010

Date Filed 05/14/2009 05/14/2009 05/26/2009
05/26/2009
05/26/2009 05/26/2009 05/26/2009 05/26/2009 05/26/2009 05/26/2009 06/17/2009 06/17/2009 06/17/2009 06/17/2009 07/09/2009
07/16/2009

# Docket Text
1 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Matthew Fransisco Alfaro. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
2 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
3 ORDER Directing Clerk to Commence Civil Action and Directing Plaintiff to Cure Deficiency. Plaintiff's shall have 30 days to submit 1915 motions on the proper court forms. Plaintiff's shall also have 30 days to file a complaint on the proper court forms, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/22/09. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
4 Prisoner's COMPLAINT against K. (I) Moore, K. Moore, J. (I) Olson, J. Olson, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, D. (I) Combs, D. Combs, filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, Ryan Merritt.(jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
5 MOTION Requesting Class Action Certification, by Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, Ryan Merritt. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
6 NOTICE OF CASE ASSOCIATION by Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, Ryan Merritt (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, Ryan Merritt. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
8 Memorandum of Law in Support of 7 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, Ryan Merritt. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, Ryan Merritt. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
10 MOTION for Order in regards to the payment of filing fees, by Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, Ryan Merritt. (jak, ) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
11 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (jjh, ) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
12 MOTION and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed Under 28 U.S.C. 1915 by Plaintiff Matthew Fransisco Alfaro. (jjh, ) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
13 (AMENDED) COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap.(jjh, ) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
14 (AMENDED) COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Matthew Fransisco Alfaro.(jjh, ) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
15 ORDER to Dismiss in Part and Denying Motions. Ordered that Plaintiff Ryan Merritt is dismissed as a party to this action for failure to cure the deficiencies. Order denying 5 Motion for Order; denying 7 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 9 Motion to Appoint Counsel. by Judge Zita L. Weinshienk on 07/08/09.(jjh, ) (Entered: 07/09/2009)
16 ORDER granting 1 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting 11 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis; granting 12 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis by Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer on 07/16/09.(jjh, ) (Entered: 07/16/2009)

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 4 of 10

07/29/2009 08/03/2009
08/31/2009 08/31/2009 08/31/2009 09/01/2009
09/02/2009 09/25/2009 09/28/2009 10/01/2009 10/02/2009 10/05/2009 10/14/2009
10/14/2009
10/27/2009

17 Mail Returned as Undeliverable re: 16 Order on Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis, Addressed to Matthew Fransisco Alfaro. (jjh, ) (Entered: 07/29/2009)
18 MINUTE ORDER the clerk of the court is directed to remail to Plaintiff Alfaro with the correct postage, together with a copy of this minute order, a copy of the courts Order Granting Leave to Proceed Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 filed in this action on July 16, 2009, and any documents specified in that order. Plaintiff Alfaro shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this minute order either to pay his initial partial filing fee of $22.00 or to show cause as directed why he is unable to pay the initial partial filing fee by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 08/03/09. (jjh, ) (Entered: 08/03/2009)
19 MOTION to Serve Defendants' Summons and Complaint by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (jjh, ) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
20 MOTION Requesting an Order in Regards to the Paymnet of Filing Fees by Plaintiff Matthew Fransisco Alfaro. (jjh, ) (Entered: 08/31/2009)
21 LETTER re: filing fees by Plaintiffs Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro. (jjh, ) (Entered: 09/01/2009)
22 Minute ORDER denying 10 Motion Requesting an Order in Regards to Payment of Filing Fees. Order denying 19 Motion Requesting an Order in Regards to Payment of Filing Fees. Order denying 20 Motion to Serve Defendants' Summons and Complaint by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/01/09.(jjh, ) (Entered: 09/01/2009)
23 ORDER Directing Plaintiffs to File Second Amended Complaint within 30 days that is signed by each Plaintiff by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/02/09. (jjh, ) (Entered: 09/02/2009)
24 AMENDED Prisoner COMPLAINT against K. (I) Moore, K. Moore, J. (I) Olson, J. Olson, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, D. (I) Combs, D. Combs, filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro.(gmssl, ) (Entered: 09/25/2009)
25 ORDER Drawing Case. Ordered that this case shall be drawn to a district judge and to a magistrate judge. By Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 09/28/2009. (sah, ) (Entered: 09/28/2009)
26 Letter from Clerk of Court addressed to Mr. Dunlap and Mr. Alfaro advising of case assignment to Judge Arguello. (sah, ) (Entered: 10/01/2009)
27 NOTICE of Change of Address by Plaintiff Matthew Fransisco Alfaro (sah, ) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
28 ORDER GRANTING SERVICE BY UNITED STATES MARSHAL. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/05/2009. (sah, ) (Entered: 10/14/2009)
29 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Magistrate Judge Hegarty is designated to conduct ALLMTN proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(a) and (b). The parties should expect to be given a firm trial setting that is 60 to 120 days from the date of the final pretrial conference, and should be available for trial accordingly. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/14/09. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 10/14/2009)
30 MINUTE ORDER Telephonic Preliminary Scheduling/Status Conference set for 1/6/2010 09:15 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Plaintiff shall participate in this conference by telephone. Plaintiffs and case managers, or a representative of the facilities, shall contact the Court at (303) 844−4507 on the above date and time in order to participate. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/14/2009. (mehcd) (Entered: 10/14/2009)
31 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Matthew Fransisco Alfaro in the amount of $ 13.00; Receipt Number COX023010; Monthly Payment. (sah, ) (Entered: 10/27/2009)

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 5 of 10

10/28/2009
10/29/2009 12/04/2009 12/07/2009 12/28/2009 12/28/2009 01/05/2010 01/05/2010 01/06/2010
01/06/2010
01/12/2010 01/21/2010 01/25/2010 01/26/2010 01/26/2010

32 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Teresa Reynolds. K. (I) Moore waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; K. Moore waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; J. (I) Olson waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; J. Olson waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; Aristedes (I) Zavaras waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; Aristedes Zavaras waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; Susan (I) Jones waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; Susan Jones waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; D. (I) Combs waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009; D. Combs waiver sent on 10/27/2009, answer due 12/28/2009. (sah, ) (Entered: 10/28/2009)
33 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Nathan Jerard Dunlap in the amount of $ 0.92; Receipt Number 023076; Monthly Payment. (wjc, ) (Entered: 10/29/2009)
34 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Nathan Jerard Dunlap in the amount of $ 1.01; Receipt Number COX023991; monthly Payment. (erv, ) (Entered: 12/07/2009)
35 Letter from Plaintiff re 34 Payment Received. (erv, ) (Entered: 12/07/2009)
36 MOTION to Dismiss by Defendants K. (I) Moore, K. Moore, J. (I) Olson, J. Olson, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, D. (I) Combs, D. Combs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 12/28/2009)
37 ANSWER to 24 Amended Complaint by K. (I) Moore, K. Moore, J. (I) Olson, J. Olson, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, D. (I) Combs, D. Combs.(Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 12/28/2009)
38 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Gail Kathryn Johnson on behalf of Nathan Jerard Dunlap (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 01/05/2010)
39 Unopposed MOTION to Continue January 6, 2010 Scheduling Conference by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 01/05/2010)
40 MEMORANDUM regarding 39 Unopposed MOTION to Continue January 6, 2010 Scheduling Conference filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 01/06/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 01/06/2010)
41 Courtroom Minutes/Minute Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 1/6/2010. 39 Unopposed Motion by Plaintiff Nathan Dunlap to Continue January 6, 2010, Scheduling Conference is GRANTED; Reset Hearings: Scheduling Conference RESET for 2/5/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Mr. Alber to prepare a Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff Alfaro only. (Court Reporter FTR − C. Coomes) (mehcd) (Entered: 01/06/2010)
42 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Mark Silverstein on behalf of Nathan Jerard Dunlap (Silverstein, Mark) (Entered: 01/12/2010)
43 PAYMENT RECEIVED from Nathan Jerard Dunlap in the amount of $.97; Receipt Number COX025177; monthly Payment. (erv, ) (Entered: 01/22/2010)
44 FINAL PAYMENT RECEIVED from Nathan Jerard Dunlap in the amount of $ 255.10; Receipt Number COX025216. (erv, ) (Entered: 01/25/2010)
45 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss All Claims Brought by Plaintiff Alfaro by Defendants K. (I) Moore, K. Moore, J. (I) Olson, J. Olson, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, D. (I) Combs, D. Combs, Plaintiff Matthew Fransisco Alfaro. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 01/26/2010)
46 MEMORANDUM regarding 45 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss All Claims Brought by Plaintiff Alfaro filed by K. Moore, D. Combs, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, J. (I) Olson, Aristedes Zavaras, D. (I) Combs, J. Olson, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, K. (I) Moore. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 01/26/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 01/26/2010)

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 6 of 10

01/28/2010
01/29/2010 02/01/2010 02/01/2010 02/05/2010
02/08/2010 02/19/2010 03/08/2010 03/09/2010 03/10/2010 03/10/2010 03/12/2010
03/12/2010 03/26/2010

47 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 45 Stipulated MOTION to Dismiss All Claims Brought by Plaintiff Alfaro, filed by K. Moore, D. Combs, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, J. (I) Olson, Aristedes Zavaras, D. (I) Combs, J. Olson, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, Matthew Fransisco Alfaro, K. (I) Moore. This Court recommends that the motion be GRANTED, that all claims brought by Plaintiff Alfaro be dismissed with prejudice, and that each party shall pay his his or its own costs and attorney's fees. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/28/2010. (mehcd) (Entered: 01/28/2010)
48 Proposed Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 01/29/2010)
49 MINUTE ORDER In light of the Stipulated Motion to Dismiss All Claims by Plaintiff Alfaro, Mr. Alfaro need not participate in the Scheduling Conference currently set for 2/5/(Modified on 2/2/2010 corrected spacing)(erv, ). (Entered: 02/01/2010)
50 CERTIFICATE of Mailing to Case Manager for Plaintiff Alfaro. (mehcd) (Entered: 02/01/2010)
51 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Scheduling Conference held on 2/5/2010. Discovery due by 8/5/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 9/6/2010. Settlement Conference set for 6/8/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/18/2010 09:30 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (FTR − Debra Brown) (kmtcd, ) (Entered: 02/05/2010)
52 SCHEDULING ORDER: by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 2/5/2010. (erv, ) (Entered: 02/08/2010)
53 ORDER AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED 47 Report and Recommendations of United States Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Granting 45 Joint Stipulated Motion to Dismiss All Claims Brought By Plaintiff Alfaro; by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 2/19/2010.(erv, ) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
54 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and To Amend Case Caption by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Document Third Amended Complaint)(Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 03/08/2010)
55 MEMORANDUM regarding 54 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and To Amend Case Caption filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 03/09/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 03/09/2010)
56 MINUTE ORDER re: 54 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and To Amend Case Caption. Defendants shall file a response to the motion on or 3/17/2010. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/10/2010. (mehcd) (Entered: 03/10/2010)
57 RESPONSE to 54 MOTION for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and To Amend Case Caption filed by Defendants K. (I) Moore, K. Moore, J. (I) Olson, J. Olson, Aristedes (I) Zavaras, Aristedes Zavaras, Susan (I) Jones, Susan Jones, D. (I) Combs, D. Combs. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 03/10/2010)
58 MINUTE ORDER granting 54 Plaintiff's unopposed Motion for Leave to File Third Amended Complaint and to Amend Case Caption. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file the Third Amended Complaint found at docket #54−2 and to amendthe case caption accordingly. The remaining Defendant shall file an answer or other response to the Third Amended Complaint in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/12/2010. (mehcd) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
59 THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT against Aristedes Zavaras in his Official Capacity, filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap.(erv, ) (Entered: 03/16/2010)
60 ANSWER to 59 Amended Complaint by Aristedes Zavaras.(Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 03/26/2010)

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 7 of 10

04/30/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010
08/16/2010 08/16/2010
08/17/2010 08/30/2010 08/31/2010
09/01/2010 09/21/2010 10/29/2010 10/29/2010 10/29/2010
11/24/2010 11/24/2010 11/30/2010

61 Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 52 Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
62 MEMORANDUM regarding 61 Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 52 Scheduling Order filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 05/03/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
63 MINUTE ORDER granting 61 Motion to Amend Scheduling Order; Discovery due by 10/13/2010. Dispositive Motions due by 11/3/2010. Final Pretrial Conference Reset for 1/10/2011 09:45 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. Settlement Conference Reset for 8/23/2010 10:00 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/3/2010.(erv, ) (Entered: 05/04/2010)
64 Stipulated MOTION to Vacate Settlement Conference by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 08/16/2010)
65 MEMORANDUM regarding 64 Stipulated MOTION to Vacate Settlement Conference filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Aristedes Zavaras. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 08/16/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 08/16/2010)
66 MINUTE ORDER granting 64 the Stipulated Motion to Vacate Settlement Conference. The Settlement Conference set for 8/23/2010 is vacated. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/17/2010. (mehcd) (Entered: 08/17/2010)
67 Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 52 Scheduling Order, 63 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify, by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 08/30/2010)
68 MEMORANDUM regarding 67 Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 52 Scheduling Order, 63 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify, filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap.Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/31/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED(cmacd ) (Entered: 08/31/2010)
69 MINUTE ORDER denying 67 the Second Stipulated Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 9/1/2010. (mehcd) (Entered: 09/02/2010)
70 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance by Edward T. Farry, Jr on behalf of Aristedes Zavaras (Farry, Edward) (Entered: 09/21/2010)
71 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to file Dispositive Motions by Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 10/29/2010)
72 MEMORANDUM regarding 71 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to file Dispositive Motions filed by Aristedes Zavaras. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 10/29/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 10/29/2010)
73 MINUTE ORDER granting 71 the Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time of the Dispositive Motions Deadline. Dispositive Motions due by 11/24/2010. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 1/26/2011 09:45 AM in Courtroom C203 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10/29/2010. (mehcd) (Entered: 11/01/2010)
74 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 11/24/2010)
75 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Gail K. Johnson, # 2 Affidavit Steven J. Martin)(Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 11/24/2010)
76 MEMORANDUM regarding 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Aristedes Zavaras, 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap. Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 8 of 10

12/13/2010 12/14/2010
12/14/2010
12/31/2010 01/03/2011 01/04/2011
02/02/2011 02/02/2011 02/09/2011
02/14/2011 02/16/2011 02/23/2011 02/25/2011 03/02/2011

Christine M. Arguello on 11/30/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 11/30/2010)
77 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 12/13/2010)
78 MEMORANDUM regarding 77 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment, 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Aristedes Zavaras. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 12/14/10. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 12/14/2010)
79 MINUTE ORDER granting 77 the Joint Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Motions for Summary Judgment. The Court directs the parties to file responses to the cross motions for summary judgment on or before January 5, 2011. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/14/2010. (mehcd) (Entered: 12/15/2010)
80 Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 52 Scheduling Order by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 12/31/2010)
81 MEMORANDUM regarding 80 Stipulated MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 52 Scheduling Order filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge Christine M. Arguello on 01/03/11. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (cmasec) (Entered: 01/03/2011)
82 MINUTE ORDER granting 80 the Third Stipulated Motino to Amend Scheduling Order. Responses to cross motions for summary judgment due by 2/2/2011. Final Pretrial Conference reset for 3/11/2011 at 9:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/4/2011. (mehcd) (Entered: 01/05/2011)
83 RESPONSE to 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 02/02/2011)
84 RESPONSE to 74 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Nathan Jerard Dunlap)(Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 02/02/2011)
85 REASSIGNING JUDGE. This action is reassigned to Judge William J. Martinez, upon his recent appointment to the court. All future pleadings should reference Judge Martinez's initials at the end of the civil action number (such as 08−cv−00001−WJM). Unless otherwise ordered, the dates and times for all previously scheduled matters will be maintained and will now be handled by Judge Martinez in Courtroom A601. His chambers are located in Room A641 of the Alfred A. Arraj U. S. Courthouse. His chambers telephone number is 303−335−2805. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT (gmssl, ) (Entered: 02/09/2011)
86 ORDER. The parties are directed to confer and to file a Joint Status Report, Status Report due 2/23/2011 by Judge William J. Martinez on 02/14/11. (jjh, ) (Entered: 02/14/2011)
87 REPLY to Response to 75 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 02/16/2011)
88 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 02/23/2011)
89 NOTICE of Disclosure. Parties wishing to suggest recusal of the Judge may do so within 10 days, by Judge William J. Martinez (gmssl, ) (Entered: 02/25/2011)
90 Joint MOTION to Vacate Final Pretrial Conference by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 03/02/2011)

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 9 of 10

03/03/2011 03/03/2011
03/07/2011 03/09/2011 03/11/2011 03/18/2011 04/08/2011 04/22/2011 04/25/2011 04/27/2011
05/20/2011 05/23/2011 05/23/2011
05/23/2011
05/25/2011

91 MEMORANDUM regarding 90 Joint MOTION to Vacate Final Pretrial Conference filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge William J. Martinez on 03/03/2011. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (wjmsec, ) (Entered: 03/03/2011)
92 MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 90 the Joint Motion to Vacate Final Pretrial Conference. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 3/11/2011 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty IS CONVERTED TO A STATUS CONFERENCE. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 3/3/2011. (mehcd) (Entered: 03/04/2011)
93 RESPONSE to 89 Notice of Disclosure by Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 03/07/2011)
94 ORDER directing Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap to file a reply to 93 RESPONSE to 89 Notice of Disclosure by Defendant Aristedes Zavaras on or before 03/18/2011. By Judge William J. Martinez on 03/09/2011. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED(wjmlc2, ) (Entered: 03/09/2011)
95 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Status Conference held on 3/11/2011. Joint Status Report due by 4/8/2011. (FTR: C. Coomes −− Courtroom A−501) (mehcd) (Entered: 03/11/2011)
96 REPLY to 93 Response to Notice of Disclosure by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Johnson, Gail) (Entered: 03/18/2011)
97 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 04/08/2011)
98 Joint STATUS REPORT by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap, Defendant Aristedes Zavaras. (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 04/22/2011)
99 MINUTE ORDER Status Conference set for 4/27/2011 09:45 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/25/2011. (erv, ) (Entered: 04/25/2011)
100 COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Telephonic Status Conference held on 4/27/2011. Proposed Final Pretrial Order due by 5/23/2011. Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/25/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty, if the case does not settle. Settlement Conference set for 5/25/2011 10:00 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. (FTR: C. Coomes −− Courtroom A−501) (mehcd) (Entered: 04/27/2011)
101 NOTICE of Entry of Appearance Rebecca Wallace by Mark Silverstein on behalf of Nathan Jerard Dunlap (Silverstein, Mark) (Entered: 05/20/2011)
102 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Final Pretrial Conference as a Status Conference by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Wallace, Rebecca) (Entered: 05/23/2011)
103 MEMORANDUM regarding 102 Unopposed MOTION to Reset Final Pretrial Conference as a Status Conference filed by Nathan Jerard Dunlap. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty by Judge William J. Martinez on 05/23/2011. TEXT ONLY ENTRY − NO DOCUMENT ATTACHED (wjmsec, ) (Entered: 05/23/2011)
104 MINUTE ORDER granting 102 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Reset Final Pretrial Conference as a Status Conference. The Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/25/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom A501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty is CONVERTED to a Status Conference. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/23/2011. (mehcd) (Entered: 05/23/2011)
105 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: Settlement Conference held on 5/25/2011. A proposed settlement was reached as to all claims. The agreement will result in a request for administrative closure of the case. (mehcd) (Entered: 05/26/2011)

Case: 1:09-cv-1196 As of: 02/06/2017 10:29 AM MST 10 of 10

05/26/2011
08/03/2011 08/03/2011 08/04/2011 01/28/2013

106 MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 74 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment, and denying 75 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment, in light of the settlement of this case. By Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/26/2011. (mehcd) (Entered: 05/26/2011)
107 Minute Entry for Status Conference held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/3/2011. (FTR: Laura Galera) (lag) (Entered: 08/03/2011)
108 Joint MOTION to Dismiss to Adminstratively Close Case by Plaintiff Nathan Jerard Dunlap. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (PDF Only))(Wallace, Rebecca) (Entered: 08/03/2011)
109 ORDER granting 108 the Parties Joint Motion to Administratively Close Case by Judge William J. Martinez on 8/4/2011.(erv, ) (Entered: 08/04/2011)
110 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Christopher Wayne Alber (Alber, Christopher) (Entered: 01/28/2013)