Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 1 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 1 of 4

1 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO #084965 (CA) DAVID F. OFFEN-BROWN #063321 (CA)
2 RAYMOND T. CHEUNG #176086 (CA) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
3 COMMISSION San Francisco District Office
4 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, California 94105-1260
5 Telephone: (415) 625-5649 Facsimile: (415) 625-5657
6 raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov

7 Attorneys for Plaintiff

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

10 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
11 Plaintiff,
12 v.
13 AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages,
14

15

Defendant.

16

)

)

)

)

)

CIVIL ACTION NO.

)

)

)

COMPLAINT

)

)

)

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

)

17

NATURE OF THE ACTION

18

This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

19 Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of race, and to provide

20 appropriate relief to June Riddick who was adversely affected by such practices. The Plaintiff

21 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleges that Defendant AT&T, Inc., dba SBC

22 Yellow Pages denied Ms. Riddick, an African-American employee, promotion opportunities due

23 to her race.

24

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

25

1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 451, 1331, 1337, 1343

26 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII

27 of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) ("Title VII") and

28 Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a.

EEOC v. AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages CIV-

Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 1 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 2 of 4

1

INTRADISTRICT ASSIGNMENT

2

2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed in Defendant’s

3 San Francisco office, which is in the County of San Francisco and within the jurisdiction of the

4 United States District Court for Northern California, San Francisco Division.

5

PARTIES

6

3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission" or

7 “EEOC”), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration,

8 interpretation and enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by

9 Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3).

10

4. At all relevant times, Defendant, AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages (the

11 "Employer"), a Delaware Corporation, has continuously been doing business in the State of

12 California and the City of San Francisco, and has continuously had at least 15 employees.

13

5. At all relevant times, Defendant Employer has continuously been an employer

14 engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 701(b), (g) and (h) of

15 Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b), (g) and (h).

16

STATEMENT OF CLAIMS

17

6 . More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, June Riddick filed a

18 charge with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by Defendant Employer. All

19 conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled.

20

7. On or about February 2003, Defendant Employer engaged in unlawful

21 employment practices at it northern California facilities, in violation of Section 703(a)(1) of Title

22 VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a)(1). The unlawful employment practices included, but are not limited

23 to, denying Ms. Riddick a promotion on the basis of her race.

24

8. The effect of the practice(s) complained of in paragraph 7 above has been to

25 deprive June Riddick of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect her

26 status as an employee and a promotion applicant, because of her race.

27

9. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above were

28 intentional.

EEOC v. AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages CIV-

Page 2

Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 1 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 3 of 4

1

10. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above were

2 done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of June Riddick.

3

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

4

Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court:

5

A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Employer, its officers,

6 successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in

7 disparate treatment in its hiring and promotion selection and any other employment practice

8 which discriminates on the basis of race.

9

B. Order Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies, practices, and

10 programs which provide equal employment opportunities for African-American employees, and

11 which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices.

12

C. Order Defendant Employer to make whole June Riddick, by providing appropriate

13 backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative

14 relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices, including but not

15 limited to promotion of June Riddick.

16

D. Order Defendant Employer to make whole June Riddick, by providing

17 compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment

18 practices described in paragraph 7 above, including but not limited to employee benefits, plus

19 interest, in amounts to be determined at trial.

20

E. Order Defendant Employer to make whole June Riddick by providing

21 compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful practices

22 complained of in paragraph 7 above, including emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life and

23 humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial.

24

F. Order Defendant employer to pay June Riddick punitive damages for its malicious

25 and reckless conduct described in paragraph 7 above, in amounts to be determined at trial.

26

G. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public

27 interest.

28

H. Award the Commission its costs in this action.

EEOC v. AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages CIV-

Page 3

Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 1 Filed 09/19/2007 Page 4 of 4

1

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

2

The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaint.

3

4

5

RONALD COOPER

General Counsel

6

7

GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS

Associate General Counsel

8

9 Dated: 10

WILLIAM R. TAMAYO Regional Attorney

11

12 Dated: 13

DAVID OFFEN-BROWN Supervisory Trial Attorney

14

15 Dated: 16

RAYMOND T. CHEUNG Senior Trial Attorney

17

18

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

COMMISSION

19

San Francisco District Office

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

EEOC v. AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages CIV-

Page 4

 
 Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 33 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 1 of 5

1 WILLIAM R. TAMAYO - #084965 (CA) DAVID OFFEN-BROWN - #063321 (CA)
2 RAYMOND T. CHEUNG - #176086 (CA) EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION
3 San Francisco District Office 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500
4 San Francisco, California 94105-1260 Telephone No. (415) 625-5649
5 Facsimile No. (415) 625-5657 raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov
6
Attorneys for Plaintiff
7

8

9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11

12 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) Case No.: Case No. C 07-4810 CRB

COMMISSION,

)

13

) CONSENT DECREE AND (PROPOSED)

Plaintiff,

) ORDER

14

vs.

)

)

15 AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages,

)

)

16

Defendant.

)

)

17

18

Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“Commission” or “EEOC”)

19 brought this lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil

20 Rights Act of 1991, to correct alleged unlawful employment practices on the basis of race

21 (African American) and to make whole Ms. June Riddick who the Commission alleged was

22 aggrieved by such practices. Plaintiff EEOC alleged that defendant Pacific Bell Directory d/b/a

AT&T Advertising & Publishing (named as “AT&T, Inc., dba SBC Yellow Pages” in the
23

Complaint) (“PBD”) unlawfully subjected Ms. Riddick to disparate treatment in the selection for
24
a promotion opportunity because of her race. PBD denied all the EEOC’s allegations, including
25
that Ms. Riddick was subjected to disparate treatment, as well as the claim of damages or

26
injuries.

27

In the interest of resolving the Lawsuit and as a result of comprehensive settlement

28 negotiations, the Commission and Defendant PBD (hereinafter referred to as “the Parties”) have

C 07-4810 CRB Consent Decree & (Proposed) Order

1

Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 33 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 2 of 5

agreed that this action should be resolved by entry of this Consent Decree. This Consent Decree
1
shall not constitute an adjudication and/or a finding on the merits of the Lawsuit. This resolution
2
does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of PBD, which expressly denies any
3
violation of law or wrongdoing. This Consent Decree represents a good faith settlement of

4 contested and disputed claims.

5

This Consent Decree resolves all claims arising out of EEOC Charge No. 37A 2004-

6 09149 and the complaint filed in the Lawsuit, and constitutes a complete and final resolution of

7 all claims of race discrimination under Title VII that were made or could have been made by the

8 Commission in this lawsuit, including class claims. This Consent Decree does not, however,

9 resolve any future charges or charges that may be pending with the EEOC other than the charge
10 and complaint specifically referenced in this paragraph. No waiver, modification or amendment
of any provision of this Consent Decree shall be effective unless made in writing and approved
11
by all the Parties to this Decree, and any substantive change, modification or amendment of any
12
provision of this Consent Decree shall also require approval by the Court.
13
The Court has reviewed this Consent Decree in light of the pleadings, the record herein, 14 and now approves this Consent Decree. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND
15 DECREED:

16 I. GENERAL PROVISIONS

17

1. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and the Parties to this Lawsuit.

18

This Court will retain jurisdiction over this Decree for all purposes until the

19

expiration of Defendant’s obligations as set forth herein.

20

2. This Consent Decree is final and binding upon the Parties, their successors and

21 22
II.
23 24 25 26 27

assigns. 3. The Parties will each bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees in this action. GENERAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF: NON-DISCRIMINATION AND NONRETALIATION
4. Consistent with Sections 703 and 704 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-2, Defendant PBD, and its officers, agents, managers (including supervisory employees), successors and assigns, are enjoined from engaging in unlawful disparate hiring and promotion practices based on race, and any other unlawful

28

employment practice which discriminates on the basis of race.

C 07-4810 CRB Consent Decree & (Proposed) Order

2

Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 33 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 3 of 5

III.
1 2 3 4 5 6
7 IV.
8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MONETARY RELIEF
5. As part of its resolution of this lawsuit, Defendant will pay Ms. Riddick seventyeight thousand dollars ($78,000) – $52,000 in alleged lost wages and $26,000 for alleged emotional distress within fourteen days of the entry of the Proposed Order by the Court. Defendant shall provide the Commission with proof of this disbursement of the settlement payment c/o Raymond T. Cheung, EEOC, 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94105.
SPECIFIC INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
6. Promotion Defendant PBD shall promote Ms. June Riddick to the first Field Service Collector opening in its Sacramento facility that it fills.
7. EEO Policies Defendant PBD shall revise, to the extent it determines necessary, its Equal Employment Opportunity (“EEO”) policies, within sixty (60) days of signing the Consent Decree, such that the policies: (i) affirms Defendant’s compliance with Title VII; (ii) articulates Defendant’s commitment to racially neutral hiring policy and practice; (iii) provide a clearly articulated process for employees to report alleged disparate hiring practices. a. If revisions are necessary, Defendant shall effectively disseminate these revised policies and procedures by: i. Distributing the policy within 60 days of its adoption to all current employees; ii. Distributing the policy to all new employees. b. Defendant shall submit a copy of the revised EEO policies, if any, to EEOC.
8. Posting An agreed upon Notice of Settlement (stating that case resolved but not identifying Ms. Riddick by name or specifying the amount of settlement) shall be, and remain, posted in a clearly visible location frequented by employees at Defendant’s Sacramento office until July 31, 2009.
9. Training of Employees.

C 07-4810 CRB Consent Decree & (Proposed) Order

3

Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 33 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 4 of 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
V.
19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Defendant AT&T, Inc. shall conduct a half-day training for all of its staffing managers in California on equal employment hiring and promotion practices. 10. Training Logistics. With respect to the training required by the above paragraph, Defendant agrees to provide a description of each training program to counsel for the Commission no later than twenty (20) days before the training programs are scheduled to be held. If the Commission has not objected to the description of the training program within seven (7) days of being given notice, such non-response shall be deemed an acknowledgment that the Commission does not object to the form, nature and content of the training. 11. Acknowledgment of Training Attendance. All persons attending mandatory anti-discrimination training pursuant to this Consent Decree shall acknowledge their attendance (through their hard copy or electronic signature) at the training, the date thereof, and their position. PBD shall retain these electronic verifications and provide the EEOC with a copy. 12. Training Reporting Within thirty (30) days of completion of the training required by this Consent Decree, PBD will send the EEOC verification of its completion of the equal employment hiring and promotion training for its employees.
DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE, RETENTION OF JURISDICTION, AND EXPIRATION OF CONSENT DECREE
13. The Commission expressly retains the right to petition this Court, prior to the expiration of the Consent Decree as set forth in Paragraph 14 below, for an extension of the Consent Decree because of noncompliance until July 31, 2009, if the Commission determines that PBD has not complied with the terms of this Consent Decree. If the Commission determines that PBD has not complied with the Consent Decree, the Commission will provide written notification of the alleged breach to Defendant and will not petition the Court for an extension of the Consent Decree sooner than thirty (30) days after providing written notification. The thirty-day period following written notice shall be used by the parties for good faith efforts to resolve the issue. If the Commission successfully petitions

C 07-4810 CRB Consent Decree & (Proposed) Order

4

Case 3:07-cv-04810-CRB Document 33 Filed 08/18/2008 Page 5 of 5

the Court to extend the Consent Decree and the Court finds PBD to be in
1
substantial violation of the terms of the Decree, the Court may extend this
2
Consent Decree by another six (6) months.
3

4

14. Unless this Consent Decree if extended pursuant to Paragraph 13 above, one (1)

5

year after the entry of this Consent Decree, it will expire and have no further force

6

or effect, and this Lawsuit will be deemed to have been dismissed with prejudice

7

without further action by the Parties and without further Court Order.

8

9
10 Dated this 11th day of August, 2008

11

/s/ Raymond T. Cheung

12

RAYMOND T. CHEUNG

13

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT

OPPORTUNITY

14

COMMISSION

San Francisco District Office

15

16

/s/ Katherine Huibonhoa

17

KATHERINE HUIBONHOA

18

Attorney for Defendant

PACIFIC BELL DIRECTORY

19

d/b/a AT&T ADVERTISING

& PUBLISHING

20

21

22

23 IT IS SO ORDERED:
24 Dated: August 18, 2008
25 26 27 28

TATES DISTRICT C
Hon. Charles R. Breyer
IT IS SOUO.SR. DDiEstRriEctDCourt Judge
Ju_d_g_e__C_h_ arles R. Breyer

UNITED S ALIFORNIA

OURT NORTH

C 07-4810 CRB Consent Decree & (Proposed) Order

ERN DISTRICT OF C

5

 
 Case: 3:07-cv-04810-CRB As of: 10/13/2009 11:23 AM PDT 1 of 4
ADRMOP, CLOSED, E−Filing, MEDTERM
U.S. District Court California Northern District (San Francisco) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:07−cv−04810−CRB

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. ATTInc. Assigned to: Hon. Charles R. Breyer Cause: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 09/19/2007 Date Terminated: 08/18/2008 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by David F. Offen−Brown U.S. EEOC 350 The Embarcadero Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105−1260 415−625−5652 Fax: (415) 625−5657 Email: David.Offen−Brown@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Raymond T. Cheung US EEOC 350 The Embarcadero, Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105−1260 415−625−5600 Fax: 415−625−5657 Email: raymond.cheung@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

William Robert Tamayo U.S. EEOC 350 Embarcadero Street Suite 500 San Francisco, CA 94105−1687 415−625−5645 Fax: 415−625−5657 Email: william.tamayo@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
ATTInc. doing business as SBC Yellow Pages

represented by Katherine C Huibonhoa Paul, Hastings, Janofsky &Walker, LLP 55 Second St., 24th Flr. San Francisco, CA 94105−3441 415−856−7000 Fax: 415−856−7100 Email: katherinehuibonhoa@paulhastings.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Laura Beth Scher Paul, Hastings, Janofsky &Walker LLP 55 Second Street 24th Floor San Francisco, CA 94105

Case: 3:07-cv-04810-CRB As of: 10/13/2009 11:23 AM PDT 2 of 4
(415) 856−7211 Fax: (415) 856−7100 Email: laurascher@paulhastings.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 09/19/2007 09/19/2007
09/19/2007 10/26/2007 11/13/2007 11/13/2007 11/13/2007 11/13/2007 11/15/2007 11/16/2007
11/26/2007 11/28/2007 11/29/2007 12/07/2007 12/13/2007 12/14/2007 12/19/2007

# Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT; summons issued against ATTInc. Filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2007) Additional attachment(s) added on 9/20/2007 (slh, COURT STAFF). (Entered: 09/19/2007)
2 ADR SCHEDULING ORDER: Case Management Statement due by 12/19/2007. Case Management Conference set for 12/26/2007 01:30 PM. (Attachments: # 1 EMC Standing Order; # 2 Case Management Standing Order)(slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2007) (Entered: 09/19/2007)
CASE DESIGNATED for Electronic Filing. (slh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/19/2007) (Entered: 09/19/2007)
3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Executed Acknowledgement filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 10/26/2007) (Entered: 10/26/2007)
4 Defendant Pacific Bell Directory d/b/a ATTAdvertising and Publishing's ANSWER to Complaint byATTInc.. (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 11/13/2007) (Entered: 11/13/2007)
5 Certificate of Interested Entities by ATTInc. Defendant's Certification As To Interested Entities or Persons (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 11/13/2007) (Entered: 11/13/2007)
6 NOTICE by ATTInc. Defendants' Corporate Disclosure Statement (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 11/13/2007) (Entered: 11/13/2007)
7 Declination to Proceed Before a U.S. Magistrate Judge by ATTInc. And REquest For Reassignment To A United States District Judge. (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 11/13/2007) (Entered: 11/13/2007)
8 CLERK'S NOTICE of Impending Reassignment to U.S. District Judge (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2007) (Entered: 11/15/2007)
9 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE. Case reassigned to Judge Charles R. Breyer for all further proceedings. Judge Edward M. Chen no longer assigned to the case. Signed by Executive Committee on 11/16/07. (ha, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/16/2007) (Entered: 11/16/2007)
10 CLERK'S NOTICE Case Management Conference set for 1/4/2008 08:30 AM. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/26/2007) (Entered: 11/26/2007)
11 STIPULATION To Extend Time For FRCP 26 Conference And Joint ADR Certification; Declaration Of Laura B. Scher In Support Thereof; and [Proposed] Order by ATTInc.. (Scher, Laura) (Filed on 11/28/2007) (Entered: 11/28/2007)
12 ORDER re 11 Stipulation filed by ATTInc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 11/2907. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/29/2007) (Entered: 11/29/2007)
13 ADR Certification (ADR L.R. 3−5b) of discussion of ADR options (Scher, Laura) (Filed on 12/7/2007) (Entered: 12/07/2007)
14 STIPULATION and Proposed Order selecting Mediation by ATTInc. Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Selecting ADR Process (Scher, Laura) (Filed on 12/13/2007) (Entered: 12/13/2007)
15 ORDER REFERRING CASE to Mediation.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 12/14/07. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2007) (Entered: 12/14/2007)
16 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT And [Proposed] Order filed by ATTInc.. (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 12/19/2007) (Entered: 12/19/2007)

Case: 3:07-cv-04810-CRB As of: 10/13/2009 11:23 AM PDT 3 of 4

12/19/2007 12/26/2007 01/04/2008
01/11/2008 01/30/2008 02/01/2008 02/20/2008 02/25/2008 03/05/2008 03/26/2008
04/11/2008
05/20/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008
07/07/2008 07/23/2008 08/13/2008

17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 12/19/2007) (Entered: 12/19/2007)
18 ADR Clerk's Notice Appointing Alan R. Berkowitz as Mediator. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/26/2007) (Entered: 12/26/2007)
19 Minute Entry: Initial Case Management Conference held on 1/4/2008 before Charles R. Breyer (Date Filed: 1/4/2008). Matter continued to allow parties to come to some resolution. Further Case Management Conference set for 4/11/2008 08:30 AM. (Court Reporter None.) (fj, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 1/4/2008) (Entered: 01/04/2008)
Pre MED phone conference scheduled on 1/16/2008 at 11:30 a.m. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/11/2008) (Entered: 01/11/2008)
20 STIPULATION Confidentiality Stipulation and [Proposed] Order by ATTInc.. (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 1/30/2008) (Entered: 01/30/2008)
21 CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND ORDER re 20 Stipulation filed by ATTInc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 02/01/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/1/2008) (Entered: 02/01/2008)
22 STIPULATION To Extend Time For Mediation And [Proposed] Order by ATTInc.. (Scher, Laura) (Filed on 2/20/2008) (Entered: 02/20/2008)
23 ORDER to Extend time for Mediation re 22 Stipulation filed by ATTInc.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/22/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/25/2008) (Entered: 02/25/2008)
Set/Reset Hearings: Mediation Hearing set for 5/15/2008 at 10:00 AM in the Mediator's office in San Francisco. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2008) (Entered: 03/05/2008)
24 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and [Proposed] Order filed by ATTInc.. (Attachments: # 1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations) Signature of Raymond T. Cheung)(Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 3/26/2008) (Entered: 03/26/2008)
25 Minute Entry: Further Case Management Conference held on 4/11/2008 before Charles R. Breyer (Date Filed: 4/11/2008). Further Case Management Conference set for 5/30/2008 08:30 AM. (Court Reporter − Not Reported.) (be, COURT STAFF) (Date Filed: 4/11/2008) (Entered: 04/11/2008)
26 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER filed by ATTInc.. (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 5/20/2008) (Entered: 05/20/2008)
27 CERTIFICATION OF MEDIATION Session dated 5/16/2008 by Mediator, Alan R. Berkowitz; Mediation session held 5/15/2008; Case settled. (cmf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2008) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
28 ORDER continuing case management conference. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/25/2008 08:30 AM.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/20/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2008) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
29 CORRECTED ORDER. re 28 Order continuing case management conference. Further Case Management Conference set for 7/25/2008 08:30 AM.. Set Hearings. Signed by Judge Charles R. Bryer on 5/20/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/21/2008) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
30 CLERK'S NOTICE Further Case Management Conference reset for 8/1/2008 08:30 AM. Case Management Statement due by 7/25/2008. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/7/2008) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
31 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT and PROPOSED Order filed by ATTInc.. (Huibonhoa, Katherine) (Filed on 7/23/2008) (Entered: 07/23/2008)
32 Proposed Order re 27 Certification of Mediation Session Consent Decree by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Cheung, Raymond) (Filed on 8/13/2008) (Entered: 08/13/2008)

Case: 3:07-cv-04810-CRB As of: 10/13/2009 11:23 AM PDT 4 of 4

08/18/2008

33 CONSENT DECREE and ORDER. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 8/18/08. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/18/2008) (Entered: 08/18/2008)