COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1 Pamela M. Bridge, Bar No. 018252 pbridge@clsaz.org
2 George H. McKay, Bar No. 015910 gmckay@clsaz.org
3 COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES 305 South Second Avenue
4 Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 258-3434, ext 2650
5 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
9

10 Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar )

Murillo, Josefa Alvarez de Meza, Marcos )

11 Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, Pedro Angulo )

Harold Appling, Cesar Arce Insunza, Jose )

12 Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo

)

Camacho, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Armando )

13 Arzate-Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, )

Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, )

14 Jose Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez,

)

Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran )

15 Miranda, Juan Beltran Soto, Rafael Beltran- )

Nunez, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose

)

16 Botello-Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario )

Bustos Cruz, Marco Antonio Cabrera-Garcia, )

17 Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario )

Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, )

18 Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose Cazares Aguilar, )

Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Cervantes- )

19 Sandoval, Jesus Cervantes-Sandoval, Jose )

Chavez Gomez, Rosario Chinchillas, Jose )

20 Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova

)

Martinez, Baldomero Corona Ruiz, Cipriano )

21 Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, )

Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado )

22 Marias, Diego Delgado Torres, Alejandro )

Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco )

23 Duarte Rascon, Jesus Duran, Juan Escalante )

Carrillo, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas,

)

24 Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham

)

Esquivel, Sergio Felix Prado, Rosario Flores )

25 Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, )

Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez

)

26 Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Raul Garcia, )

Salvador Garcia, Jesus Gaxiola, Jose

)

27 Gaxiola, Rosa Gaxiola, Mauro German

)

Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, )

28 Jose Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez,

)

CIVIL ACTION NO. _____________
COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 Filed 12/19/2007 Page 1 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1 Genoveva Gonzalez, Gloria Gonzalez,

)

Maria Gonzalez, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, )

2 Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Reynaldo

)

Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez-Valdez, )

3 Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez,

)

Jesus Hernandez Chavira, Mario Hernandez )

4 Hernandez, Sabas Hernandez Muniz,

)

Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus

)

5 Hernandez Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera Luna, )

Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, )

6 Francisco Leon Torres, Fernando Linares )

Sanchez, Luis Llamas Leon, Martin Arturo )

7 Lopez, Gamaniel Lopez Espinoza, Lino

)

Lopez Figueroa, Casimiro Lopez Medina, )

8 Jose Lopez-Villegas, Teodoro Loya Carrillo, )

Pedro Lubiano Cisneros, Ruben Luna

)

9 Ramirez, Jesus Luque, Rito Luque Luque, )

Juan Luque Martinez, Abelino Macias

)

10 Nunez, Antonio Magana Valdovinos, Sergio )

Magana Villicana , Isidro Martinez, Olegario )

11 Martinez Carrillo, Maria Martinez Rosas, )

Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina,Rey )

12 David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina )

Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio )

13 Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa Sedano, Orne )

Meza Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria )

14 Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus

)

Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda Lopez, )

15 Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Luis

)

Montanez, Juan Morales Sanchez, Baltazar )

16 Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno-Gutierrez, )

Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete )

17 Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala )

Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez )

18 Gonzalez, Felix Nunez Rios, Gerardo

)

Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, )

19 Marco Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, )

Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Martin )

20 Patino Juarez, Venancio Patino Ortega,

)

Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, )

21 Armando Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia

)

Contreras, Modeso Plasencia, Facundo

)

22 Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Juan )

Ramirez Garcia, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Jose )

23 Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador )

Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Graciela )

24 Reyes Medina, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, )

Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco

)

25 Rodriguez Cervantes, Rey Rodriguez Palma, )

Miguel Rodriguez Ramirez, Ramon

)

26 Rodriguez Rubio, Juan Rodriguez-Orozco, )

Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, )

27 Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano-Lomeli, )

Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo )

28 Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan

)

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -2F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 2 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1 Sanchez Huerta, Miguel Sanchez Huerta, )

Jose Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, )

2 Maria Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, )

Rosario Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose Segura )

3 Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio )

Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia )

4 Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo )

Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda )

5 Torres Herrera, Jorge Trejo Gonzalez, Jose )

Valdez Acosta, Luis Valdez Duran, Victor )

6 Valenzuela, Miguel Valenzuela Gurrola, )

Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino

)

7 Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose

)

Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique )

8 Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose )

Vibriezca Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, Martin )

9 Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas )

Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel )

10 Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, )

Mario Zarate Godines, Gustavo Zerega

)

11 Espinoza,

)

)

12

Plaintiffs,

)

)

13 vs.

)

)

14 Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc.,

)

Richard De Leon, Ralph De Leon, d/b/a

)

15 Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos, and

)

Marlin Ranching Company,

)

16

)

Defendants.

)

17

)

____________________________________ )

18

19

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

20

1. To protect the wages and working conditions of the domestic agricultural

21 workforce, federal law requires employers to exercise a preference for U.S. farmworkers

22 before turning to foreign farm labor. In 2006, in violation of these and other federal labor

23 protections, Defendants displaced its entire U.S. citizen and legal permanent resident

24 workforce with foreign nationals brought in as H-2A guest workers.

25

2. Plaintiffs, displaced U.S. farmworkers employed by Defendants in the

26 2005-2006 and previous citrus harvesting seasons, bring claims for violations of the Migrant

27 and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act ("AWPA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1802 et seq.,

28 including Defendants’ breach of the parties’ working arrangement and provision of false and

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -3F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 3 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1 misleading information concerning the terms and conditions of employment.

2

3. Further, U.S. citizen Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel

3 Angel Rapan, and Fernando Duarte Ochoa bring claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981 for

4 discrimination in hiring based on alienage.

5

JURISDICTION

6

4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, since

7 the action arises under the laws of the United States; 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(4), covering claims

8 arising under federal civil rights statutes; and 29 U.S.C. § 1854, covering claims arising under

9 the AWPA.

10

5. Venue is proper in this Court based on 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) since a substantial

11 part of the relevant events and omissions occurred in the district of Arizona.

12

PARTIES

13

6. Plaintiffs Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez de

14 Meza, Marcos Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Harold Appling, Cesar Arce

15 Insunza, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo Camacho, Santiago Arzate Carrillo,

16 Armando Arzate-Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon

17 Jusaino, Jose Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran

18 Miranda, Juan Beltran Soto, Rafael Beltran-Nunez, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose

19 Botello-Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marco Antonio Cabrera-Garcia,

20 Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido

21 Castro Ruiz, Jose Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Cervantes-Sandoval,

22 Jesus Cervantes-Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario Chinchillas, Jose Contreras

23 Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona Ruiz, Cipriano Crispin Mendez,

24 Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado

25 Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus Duran,

26 Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham

27 Esquivel, Sergio Felix Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco,

28 Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Raul Garcia, Salvador

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -4F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 4 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1 Garcia, Jesus Gaxiola, Jose Gaxiola, Rosa Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, 2 Alfonso Gomez, Jose Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Genoveva Gonzalez, Gloria Gonzalez, 3 Maria Gonzalez, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Reynaldo Guerra 4 Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez-Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus Hernandez 5 Chavira, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, 6 Jesus Hernandez Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, 7 Francisco Leon Torres, Fernando Linares Sanchez, Luis Llamas Leon, Martin Arturo Lopez, 8 Gamaniel Lopez Espinoza, Lino Lopez Figueroa, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jose 9 Lopez-Villegas, Teodoro Loya Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano Cisneros, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus 10 Luque, Rito Luque Luque , Juan Luque Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana 11 Valdovinos, Sergio Magana Villicana , Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria 12 Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus 13 Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa Sedano, 14 Orne Meza Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus 15 Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda Lopez, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Luis Montanez, 16 Juan Morales Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno-Gutierrez, Samuel Murillo 17 Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez 18 Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben 19 Olvera Gonzalez, Marco Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano 20 Parra, Martin Patino Juarez, Venancio Patino Ortega, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus 21 Penunuri, Armando Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modeso Plasencia, Facundo 22 Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Juan Ramirez Garcia, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Jose Luis 23 Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Graciela Reyes 24 Medina, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez Cervantes, 25 Rey Rodriguez Palma, Miguel Rodriguez Ramirez, Ramon Rodriguez Rubio, Juan, 26 Rodriguez-Orozco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime 27 Ruano-Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, 28 Juan Sanchez Huerta, Miguel Sanchez Huerta, Jose Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis,
Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -5F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 5 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1 Maria Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose Segura

2 Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro,

3 Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda Torres

4 Herrera, Jorge Trejo Gonzalez, Jose Valdez Acosta, Luis Valdez Duran, Victor Valenzuela,

5 Miguel Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas

6 Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez,

7 Jose Vibriezca Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas

8 Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo,

9 Mario Zarate Godines, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza are United States legal permanent residents

10 and farmworkers who have their permanent place of residence in and around Yuma County,

11 Arizona.

12

7. Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, and

13 Fernando Duarte Ochoa are United States citizens and farmworkers who have their permanent

14 place of residence in and around Yuma County, Arizona.

15

8. Upon information and belief, Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex. Inc. does

16 business in Arizona and is registered in Arizona as a corporation.

17

9. Upon information and belief, Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos

18 previously did business in Arizona during the 2005-2006 citrus season. Defendant Ralph De

19 Leon was an owner of Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos. Defendant Richard De

20 Leon is his son, is an owner and president of Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., and

21 was operations manager of Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos. Because Defendant Servicios

22 Agricolas Mexicanos and Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. are fundamentally joined

23 and joint employers, they will be hereinafter "SAM."

24

10. Upon information and belief, Defendant Marlin Ranching Company

25 (hereinafter "Marlin") does business in Arizona and is registered as a corporation in Arizona.

26

11. Defendants are being sued as employers of Plaintiffs at all times relevant to this

27 case.

28 / / /

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -6F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 6 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1

STATEMENT OF FACTS

2

12. During the 2005-2006 citrus season and for several seasons before, Defendants

3 employed Plaintiffs to work in citrus harvests.

4

13. At all times relevant to this action, Plaintiffs were seasonal agricultural workers

5 within the meaning of the AWPA, at 29 U.S.C. § 1802(10), and/or individuals entitled to the

6 AWPA’s protections.

7

14. At all times relevant to this action, Defendants were "agricultural employers"

8 within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1802(2).

9

15. Prior to the harvest seasons 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, in August

10 each year, Defendants recruited Plaintiffs to perform agricultural labor in and around San Luis,

11 Arizona.

12

16. Plaintiffs expected to be rehired every season by Defendants.

13

17. During the harvest seasons 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, it was

14 Defendants’ practice to either contact Plaintiffs by letter or telephone or recruit them in

15 parking lots in San Luis, Arizona and inform them about the start date of the harvest season.

16

18. In 2006, rather than rehiring Plaintiffs, SAM sought permission to import

17 foreign H-2A workers, premised on certifications that it could not find qualified U.S. workers

18 for the citrus harvest. On June 29, 2006, the Department of Labor (DOL) approved SAM’s

19 application, attached as Exhibit 1 (hereinafter "SAM order").

20

19. The SAM order was also filed with the Arizona Department of Economic

21 Security Office in Phoenix, Arizona.

22

20. The SAM order was an offer of employment to 150 workers to be employed

23 as fruit harvest workers from August 15, 2006 through March 31, 2007.

24

21. The SAM order constituted an offer of employment to Plaintiffs and a

25 "working arrangement" between Defendants and Plaintiffs.

26

22. The SAM order was utilized by Defendants as a written disclosure of the terms

27 and conditions of employment.

28

23. The SAM order stated that Defendants would provide housing in Dateland,

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -7F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 7 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1 Arizona and promised $8.00 per hour and 30 hours of work per week.

2

24. In the job order, SAM offered hours and wages inferior to those offered and

3 paid to Plaintiffs in previous seasons, when SAM was not importing foreign farm labor.

4

25. Upon information and belief, the prevailing wages and working hours of citrus

5 harvesters in the San Luis, Arizona area in 2006-2007 exceeded $240.00 and 30 hours of

6 work per week.

7

26. Upon information and belief, Defendants knew that the wages and working

8 hours of citrus harvesters in San Luis, Arizona area in 2006-2007 exceeded $240.00 per week

9 and 30 hours of work per week.

10

27. Upon information and belief, Defendants intentionally set the promised wages

11 and working hours below prevailing market conditions in an effort to make the jobs

12 undesirable to U.S. workers.

13

28. Attached to the SAM order was a letter from Defendant Marlin, the citrus

14 grower, stating that it intended to contract with "SAMEX" for lemon and orange harvesters

15 from August 15, 2006 through March 31, 2007. Marlin’s letter stated that it needed 150

16 workers.

17

29. Also attached to the order was a document stating that Defendant Servicios

18 Agricolas Mex. Inc. carried workers compensation and employers liability insurance policy

19 from August 1, 2005- August 1, 2006.

20

30. Also attached to the SAM order were assurances by Defendants that they would

21 "positively recruit" U.S. workers.

22

31. Despite these assurances, before the 2006-2007 harvest season, none of the

23 Plaintiffs was recruited by Defendants.

24

32. Before the 2006-2007 harvest season, none of the Plaintiffs received letters or

25 telephone calls from Defendants informing them of the start date of the season.

26

33. Before the 2006-2007 harvest season, Defendants failed to recruit at the

27 parking lots in San Luis, Arizona, the prevailing practice in the area and Defendants’ past

28 practice.

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -8F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 8 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1

34. Before the 2006-2007 harvest season and at the beginning of the season,

2 several Plaintiffs asked agents of Defendants when the season would begin, and they were told

3 that they were being replaced by "Mexican contract workers."

4

35. None of the Plaintiffs was hired by Defendants for the 2006-2007 lemon

5 season.

6

36. Instead, Defendants filled all 150 harvesting positions with foreign H-2A

7 workers.

8

37. All of the H-2A workers hired by Defendants were foreign nationals. None was

9 a citizen or resident of the United States.

10

38. As of a result of Defendants’ failure to recruit and hire Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs

11 suffered damages.

12

39. While previously employed by Defendants, Plaintiffs harvested crops that were

13 produced for movement in interstate commerce, or for incorporation as ingredients in products

14 anticipated to move in interstate commerce.

15

40. All of the actions and omissions alleged in this Complaint were undertaken by

16 Defendants either directly or through their agents.

17

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

18 (Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.)

19

41. Plaintiffs allege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 to 40.

20

42. The SAM order constituted a "working arrangement" as defined under the

21 AWPA, between Plaintiffs and Defendants.

22

43. The SAM order was utilized by Defendants to satisfy the written disclosures

23 provision of the AWPA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1821(a) and 1831(a).

24

44. Defendants knowingly provided false and misleading information to the DOL

25 and Plaintiffs concerning the terms, conditions and existence of employment by Defendants

26 in contravention of the AWPA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1821(f) and 1831(e), by:

27

a. informing many Plaintiffs that jobs were not available;

28

b. failing to recruit Plaintiffs by telephone, mail or in parking lots as

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -9F-iled 12/19/2007 Page 9 of 11

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

1

practiced in previous seasons;

2

c. including assurances set forth in the SAM order to positively recruit

3

while intending to not comply with such assurances;

4

d. falsifying the amount of hours per week of employment while knowing

5

that the hours would be greater.

6

45. Defendants’ failure to recruit and provide employment to Plaintiffs was without

7 justification and violated the terms of Defendants' working arrangement with Plaintiffs, in

8 contravention of the AWPA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1822 (c) and 1832 (c).

9

46. The violations of the AWPA described herein were the result of the conscious

10 and deliberate actions of Defendants and were intentional within the meaning of the AWPA,

11 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (1982).

12

47. For each violation of the AWPA, each Plaintiff so affected is entitled to receive

13 the greater of his actual damages or up to $500.00 per violation in statutory damages pursuant

14 to 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (c).

15

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

16

(Discrimination Based Upon Alienage, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq )

17

(On Behalf of Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel

18

Rapan, and Fernando Duarte Ochoa)

19

48. Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, and

20 Fernando Duarte Ochoa allege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 to 47.

21

49. Defendants intentionally discriminated against Plaintiffs Harold Appling,

22 Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, and Fernando Duarte Ochoa in the making of

23 an employment contract, by refusing to recruit or re-hire them as harvest workers based upon

24 their alienage, in favor of non-resident, Mexican nationals.

25

50. Defendants intentionally and knowingly attempted to dissuade U.S. workers

26 including Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan and

27 Fernando Duarte Ochoa from employment with Defendants by offering sub-market weekly

28 wages and hours, in order to create a pretext for alienage discrimination.

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -1F0i-led 12/19/2007 Page 10 of 11

1

51. As a result of Defendants’ violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et. seq., Plaintiffs

2 Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, and Fernando Duarte Ochoa

3 are entitled to declaratory and injunctive relief and actual damages.

4

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

5

Wherefore, Plaintiffs pray that this Court grant them the following relief:

6

a. Declare that Defendants intentionally violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the

7

AWPA;

8

b. Award each Plaintiff the greater of his or her actual damages, or statutory

9

damages of $500 for each violation of the AWPA in each season

10

applicable;

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES
CENTRAL OFFICE ! FARMWORKER PROGRAM 305 South Second Avenue ! P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
(602) 258-3434 ! FAX (602) 258-4628 ! TDD (602) 254-9852

11

c. Enjoin Defendants from future violations of the AWPA by failing to

12

recruit and hire U.S. farmworkers;

13

d. Declare that Defendants discriminated against Plaintiffs Harold Appling,

14

Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, and Fernando Duarte

15

Ochoa based upon their alienage pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1981;

16

e. Award Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel

17

Rapan, and Fernando Duarte Ochoa their actual damages for Defendants’

18

violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1981;

19

f. Enjoin Defendants from future hiring discrimination in violation of 42

20

U.S.C. § 1981, by favoring foreign nationals over U.S. citizens;

21

g. Award Plaintiffs pre- and post judgment interest; their costs of suit; and

22

for additional counsel (other than undersigned) who may appear, their

23

reasonable attorney’s fees; and

24

h. Award Plaintiffs such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.

25 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 19th day of December, 2007.

26

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES

27

28

/s/Pamela M. Bridge

Pamela M. Bridge

Case 2:07-cv-02581-EHC Document 1 -1F1i-led 12/19/2007 Page 11 of 11

 
 1 WO

2

3

4

5

6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8

9 REYNALDO GUERRA JIMENEZ, et al., )

)

10

Plaintiffs,

)

)

11 vs.

)

)

12

)

SERVICIOS AGRICOLAS MEX, INC.,et al.)

13

)

Defendants.

)

14

)

)

15 JUAN ABARCA FIGUEROA, et al.,

)

)

16

Plaintiffs,

)

)

17 vs.

)

)

18 SERVICIOS AGRICOLAS MEX, INC.,et al.)

)

19

Defendants.

)

)

20

)

No. CV-07-01492-PHX-GMS No. CV-07-02581-PHX-GMS (Consolidated)
ORDER

21

Two m otions for sum mary judgm ent are pending before the Court: one filed by

22 Defendants, (Doc. 179), and one filed by Plaintiffs, (Doc. 181). For the following reasons,

23 the Court denies Defendants’ m otion and grants Plaintiffs’ m otion in part and denies it in

24 part.

25

BACKGROUND

26

This case results fromthe consolidation of two matters, each with multiple Plaintiffs.

27 In total, Plaintiffs are a group of United States citizens or legal perm anent residents who

28 allegedly worked picking lemons for Defendants Marlin Ranching, Inc. (“Marlin Ranching”),

1 Marlin Growers, Inc. (“Marlin Growers”), Servicios Agricola Mexicano ( “SAMCO”),

2 Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. (“SAMI”), Richard De Leon, and Ralph De Leon. Plaintiffs

3 allege that they worked for the Defendants in two relevant growing seasons, 2004–05 and

4 2005–06.

5

Defendants are several corporations and individuals that Plaintiffs allege work

6 together as one joint employer. Specifically, Marlin Ranching is an Arizona corporation that

7 farms citrus and owns or leases land on which Plaintiffs picked the leomns. Marlin Ranching

8 also would determine the dates and times when workers would be allowed to pick lemons.

9 Marlin Growers is a cooperative of citrus growers that received and paid the invoices for the

10 labor Plaintiffs performed. SAMCO was a now-dissolved California farm-labor contracting

11 corporation. SAMCO provided citrus harvesting and pruning services in California and

12 Arizona. SAMI is an Arizona farm -labor contracting corporation that allegedly provided

13 labor contracting services to the Marlin entities. Ralph De Leon was the president of

14 SAMCO and allegedly exercised operational and day-to-day control over SAMCO. Richard

15 De Leon is Ralph De Leon’s son and is a shareholder and president of SAMI. Richard De

16 Leon allegedly had control over SAMI’s overall business and day-to-day operations. At the

17 same time he m anaged SAMI, he was em ployed by SAMCO, but the parties dispute the

18 extent of that employment relationship. During the two relevant seasons, Plaintiffs were on

19 the payroll of S AMCO and/or S AMI. While working on the payroll of S AMCO and/or

20 SAMI, Plaintiffs allegedly picked lem ons on behalf of the Marlin entities in and around

21 Yuma County, Arizona and Imperial County, California.

22

Plaintiffs contend that they were required to wait at various tim es and places to be

23 given permission to start picking lemons. Lemons may be picked only under certain weather

24 conditions. Therefore, farm ers must measure the humidity in the air before com mencing

25 harvesting. Plaintiffs allege that the unpredictable conditions caused them to have to wait

26 to begin work, even though their work days arguably had begun. Specifically, Plaintiffs raise

27 four scenarios in which they frequently had to wait, but were not compensated.

28

- 2 -

1

First, they allegedly waited at the “corralon,” which was the bus stop whe re many

2 Plaintiffs waited for a company bus to take them to the fields for work. Although taking the

3 bus was optional, Defendants apparently strongly encouraged Plaintiffs to take the bus to the

4 fields and required those workers choosing to take the bus to arrive at the bus stop by a

5 particular time each morning. Plaintiffs thenwould wait for the bus to arrive; the bus would

6 sometimes arrive at the announced time, but it would arrive late on days when the lem ons

7 were not ready to be picked in the early morning. Plaintiffs could engage in various personal

8 activities while waiting for the bus, but, as a practical matter, were limited in the distance

9 they could travel fromthe corralon for fear that the bus would arrive and leave without the.m

10 Similarly, Plaintiffs contend they would sometimes arrive at the fields, only to be informed

11 that the lemons were not ready for picking. On those days, Plaintiffs allegedly were forced

12 to wait at the fields until picking was allowed. In addition to the time spent waiting at the

13 fields and in the corralon, Plaintiffs assert th at they were not fully com pensated for tim e

14 spent traveling on the bus from the corralon to the fields in Arizona and California and that

15 they were not compensated for time allegedly spent traveling fromone field to another field

16 during the work day. Plaintiffs further offer evidence that Defendants did not accurately

17 record this waiting and travel time.

18

Aside from Defendants’ alleged failures to record and compensate certain time, one

19 group of U.S.-citizen Plaintiffs alleges that Defendants refused to rehire thembased on their

20 status as U.S. citizens. Until the 2006–07 harvest, Defendants’ practice was to recruit and

21 rehire its U.S. workforce from previous seasons. On June 19, 2006, however, Defendants

22 filed an application to im port one hundred and fifty tem porary foreign workers for the

23 2006–07 harvest. On this application, Defendnats represented that they would independently

24 contact potential qualified workers by letter and/or telephone. Contrary to U.S. Department

25 of Labor instructions, however, Defendants m ade no attem pt by telephone, in-pe rson

26 solicitation, or correspondence, to solicit the return of its U.S. workforce as it had done in

27 previous seasons. Ultimately, Defendants did not rehire this group of U.S.-citizen Plaintiffs

28 for the 2006–07 season, but instead hired immigrant H-2A workers.

- 3 -

1

Plaintiffs filed the two now-consolidated actions. TheJimenez Plaintiffs allege four

2 claims: (1) violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201et seq. (“FLSA”), (2)

3 violation of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801

4 et seq. (“AWPA”), (3) breach of c ontract, and (4) violation of California labor laws and

5 regulations. The Figueroa Plaintiffs raise two claim s: (1) violation of AWPA, and (2)

6 discrimination based on alienage/citizenship under 42 U.S.C. § 1981. Plaintiffs m ove for

7 summary judgment on claims based on the FLSA, AWPA, breach of employment contract,

8 and California wage laws. Defenda nts, meanwhile, move for sum mary judgment on the

9 discrimination claim brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

10

LEGAL STANDARD

11

Summary judgm ent is appropriate against a party who “fails to ma ke a showing

12 sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case, and on which

13 that party will bear the burden of proof at trial.”Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322

14 (1986). The Court should grant summary judgment only if the evidence, viewed in the light

15 most favorable to the nonm oving party, shows “that there is no genuine issue as to any

16 material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” Fed. R. Civ. P.

17 56(c). Substantive law determines which facts are material, and “[o]nly disputes over facts

18 that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the

19 entry of summary judgment.” Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 248 (1986);

20 see Jesinger v. Nev. Fed. Credit Union , 24 F.3d 1127, 1130 (9th Cir. 1994). The m oving

21 party “bears the initial responsibility of informing the district court of the basis for its omtion,

22 and identifying those portions of [the record] which it believes demonstrate the absence of

23 a genuine issue of m aterial fact.” Celotex, 477 U.S. at 323. Then, the burden is on the

24 nonmoving party to establish a genuine issue of material fact. Id. at 322–23. The nonmoving

25 party “may not rely merely on allegations or denials in its own pleading; rather, its response

26 must—by affidavits or as otherwise provided in this rule—set out specific facts showing a

27 genuine issue for trial.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(2); see Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith

28 Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 586–87 (1986). Such “supporting or opposing affidavit[s]must

- 4 -

1 be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be adimssible in evidence, and show

2 that the affiant is com petent to testif y on the m atters stated.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(1).

3 Finally, because “[c]redibility determinations, the weighing of the evidence, and the drawing

4 of legitimate inferences from the facts are jury functions, not those of a judge, . . . [t] he

5 evidence of the nonmovant is to be believed, and all justifiable inferences are to be drawn

6 in his [or her] favor” at the summary judgment stage. Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248.

7

DISCUSSION

8

Defendants move for summary judgment on Plaintiffs’ claimunder 42 U.S.C. § 1981.

9 In their Motion, Plaintiffs m ove for sum mary judgment on the following issues: (1) that

10 Defendants SAMI, SAMCO, Marlin Ranching, Marlin Growers, Ralph De Leon, and

11 Richard De Leon were joint employers of Plaintiffs; (2) that Defendants are liable under the

12 Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) for failure to compensate Plaintiffs for the tim e spent

13 waiting in parking lots and fields; (3) that Defendants are liable under the Migrant and

14 Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (“AWPA”) for failure to pay wages due, for

15 violation of the working arrangem ent, and for record-keeping violations; and (4) that

16 Defendants are liable under California labor laws and regulations for failure to pay wages

17 due for labor performed by Plaintiffs in California.

18 II. ANALYSIS

19

A. United States Citizens May Bring a Section 1981 Claim forDiscrimination

on the Basis of Citizenship.

20

21

The parties dispute whether Plaintiffs may bring a cause of action under 42 U.S.C. §

22 1981 for discrimination based on their status as U.S. citizens. Plaintiffs assert that

23 Defendants refused to rehire them as farm workers for the 2006–07 seasons and that

24 Defendants instead made various misrepresentations to the U.S. Department of Labor in

25 order to hire immigrant H-2A workers. In the present context, Plaintiffs adequately allege

26 that this constitutes discrimination prohibited by 42 U.S.C. § 1981 provides, “[a]ll persons

27 within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and

28 Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence and to the full and

- 5 -

1 equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is

2 enjoyed by white citizens.” 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a). Contrary to Defendants’ asse rtion, the

3 plain text of Section 1981 applies to “[al]l persons,” which necessarily includes both citizens

4 and non-citizens. 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a); see also Graham v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 365, 375

5 (1971) (explaining in the context of Section 1981 that “an alien as well as a citizen is a

6 ‘person’ for equal protection purposes”); Sagana v. Tenorio, 384 F.3d 731, 738 (9th Cir.

7 2004) ( “‘The protection of this statute has been held to extend to aliens as well as to

8 citizens.’”) (quoting Takahashi v. Fish and Game Comm’n, 334 U.S. 410, 419 (1948)).

9

Defendants’ Motion focuses largely on the scope of “alienage” discrimination under

10 Section 1981, asserting that U.S. citizens cannot bring claim

s based on alienage

11 discrimination because, by defni ition, Plaintiffs are not aliens. Nevertheless, § 1981 provides

12 to all persons “the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts.”

13 No where does it use the term“alien” to describe those to whomit extends protection. And

14 to the extent that Defendants have extended a hiring preference to non-citizens they have

15 engaged in a violation of the statute’s plain term s by giving non-American citizens hiring

16 preference over Americans. When the statute requires that all persons shall have the same

17 right to make and enforce contracts . . . as enjoyed by white citizens.”

18 Thus, when the Plaintiffs allege that Defendants extended em ployment uniquely to non-

19 citizens of the United States, they allege that, as citizens of the United States, they were

20 deprived of the same right to contract as was extended to non-citizens. Such conduct falls

21 squarely within the express prohibitions of § 1981.

22

The Suprem e Court has stated in the context of race-based discrim ination under

23 Section 1981. In McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transp. Co., white plaintiffs were allegedly

24 discriminated against by their employer on the basis of race. 427 U.S. 273, 274 (1976). The

25 plaintiffs brought a claim under Section 1981, but the district court dismissed the complaint,

26 concluding that the language “as is enjoyed by white citizens” rendered Section 1981

27 applicable only to non-white plaintiffs. Id. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that the

28 plain language of Section 1981 protects “all persons” from discrimination. Id. at 285

- 6 -

1 (emphasis added). AsMcDonald concluded that the plain language of Section 1981 prohibits

2 discrimination against persons of all races, and not only non-whites, it is axiomatic that,

3 Section 1981 prohibits discrimination against persons of all citizenships and not only non-

4 Americans.

5

Several other courts have followed this approach. In Thomas v. Rohner-Gehrig &

6 Co., plaintiffs, who were Am ericans working for a Swiss com pany, were discharged and

7 replaced by Swiss and Germans. 582 F. Supp. 669, 671 (N.D. Ill. 1984). Plaintiffs brought

8 a claim under Section 1981 for discrimination based on national origin. Id. at 671. Although

9 the court dismissed the claim on other grounds, it allowed plaintiffs to amend their complaint

10 to state a claim under Section 1981because Am erican citizens m ay be able to allege

11 citizenship discrimination under that statute. Id. at 672–73. The Court explained:

12

Plaintiff’s complaint does not allege that plaintiffs were American citizens, or

that their replacements were not American citizens. Were that in fact the case,

13

and if Section 1981 does prohibit alienage discrim ination, we could have a

situation amounting to reverse alienage discrimination, and redress might be

14

available under Section 1981. Thus, we believe the appropriate action with

regard to plaintiffs’ Section 1981 claim is to dismiss with leave to amend.

15

16 Id. at 673; see also United States v. Richard Dattner Architects, 972 F. Supp. 738, 747–48

17 (S.D.N.Y. 1997) (recognizing the possibility that an American citizen may allege citizenship

18 discrimination under Section 1981).

19

The cases cited by Defendants are unpersuasive, because like Defendants they base

20 their analysis on the word “alienage” which is nowhere in the statute. For exapmle, Chaiffetz

21 v. Robertson Research Holding, stated, “[D]iscrimination against whites is racial

22 discrimination, but (in America) discrimination against Am ericans can never be

23 discrimination based on alienage. It can only be discrimination based on national origin . .

24 . relief under Section 1981[] is unavailable.” 798 F.2d 731, 735 (5th Cir. 1986). The Eastern

25 District of New York recently followed this logic, asserting that Section 1981 “appl[ies] to

26 discrimination on the basis of alienage, i.e. non-U.S. citizenship.” Vaughn v. City of N.Y.,

27 2010 WL 2076926, at *10 (E.D.N.Y. May 24, 2010). Both Chaifetz and Vaughn reasoned

28 that the term “alienage,” according to its dictionary definition, could apply only to non-U.S.

- 7 -

1 citizens. Chaiffetz, 798 F.2d at 735; Vaughn, 2010 WL 2076926, at *10. While it may be

2 true that an “alien” is a citizen of another country, Section 1981 does not include the term

3 “alien.” 42 U.S.C. § 1981.1 Rather, it applies to “all persons.”

4

As is already explained, Section 1981’s plain text, as well as Suprem e Court and

5 Ninth Circuit precedent hold that Section 1981 (1) protects “all persons” against

6 discrimination, (2) applies to U.S. citizens, and (3) protects against so- called “reverse

7 discrimination.” McDonald, 427 U.S. at 285;Takahashi, 334 U.S. at 419;Sagana, 384 F.3d

8 at 738. Therefore, it does not follow that Americans would be unprotected fromthis type of

9 discrimination, where non-citizens would be afforded this relief.

10

Plaintiffs have presented evidence that Defendants refused to rehire the,mand instead

11 hired non-citizen immigrant workers instead. In other words, Defendants deprived Plaintiffs

12 of an equal right to contract as was enjoyed by others, and Defendants engaged in such

13 discrimination against the Plaintiffs based on their citizenship status. This falls squarely

14 within the prohibition of Section 1981. Thus, Defendants’ motion on this issue is denied.

15

B. Private Alienage Discrimination is Proscribed under Section 1981

16

The Civil Rights Act of 1991 am ended Section 1981 to add sections (b) and (c).

17 Section (c) provides, “The rights protected by this section are protected against impairment

18 by nongovernmental discrimination and impairment under c olor of State law.” 42 U.S.C.

19 § 1981(c). In other words, the rights protected in Section 1981(a) apply to both public and

20 private discrimination. See Conn. Nat’l Bank v. Germain,503 U.S. 249, 254 (1992) (“When

21 the words of a statute are unambiguous, . . . ‘judicial inquiry is complete.’”).

22

23

1Not only does Section 1981’s text not include the term “alien,” courts recognizing

discrimination against non-citizens have used the te rms “alienage” and “citizenship” 24 interchangeably. See, e.g., Martinez v. Partch, 2008 WL 113907, at *2 (D. Colo. Jan. 9,

25 2008) (using “citizenship discrimination” and “alienage discrimination” interchangeably); Chacko v. Tex. A&M Univ ., 960 F. Supp. 1180, 1191 (S.D. Tex. 1997) (“Accordingly,
26 section 1981 must be construed to prohibit private discrim ination on the basis of

27

citizenship.”); Cheung v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc., 913 F. Supp. 248, 251 (S.D.N.Y. 1996) (“The Supreme Court has held that section 1981 also prohibits states from

28 enacting laws which discriminate on the basis of citizenship.”) (internal citation omitted).

- 8 -

1

Defendants make no argument that this statute is unconstitutional. The analysis in

2 Bhandari is distinguishable, as that case was decdi ed prior to the 1991 enactment of Section

3 (c).

4

Courts interpreting the am ended Section (c) have found that it applies to private

5 conduct. In Anderson, the issue on appeal was whether the appellees violated Section 1981

6 by discharging a union member because he was not a citizen of the United States. 156 F.3d

7 at 176. The Second Circuit explained, “[t] he 1991 amendment to Section 1981. . . m akes

8 clear that the rights enum erated in section 1981(a) are protec ted from private as well as

9 governmental discrimination.” Id. at 176. In Chacko, addressing the same issue, the court

10 noted, “Although questions m ay have existed previously about whether Section 1981’s

11 protections against alienage discrimination extend to both public and private actors, the 1991

12 amendments to Section 1981 m ake clear that ‘[t]he rights protected by this section are

13 protected against impairment by nongovernmental discrimination.’” 149 F. Supp. at 1191

14 (quoting 42 U.S.C. § 1981(c));see also Martinez, 2008 WL 113907, at *2 n. 5 (“[Th] e post-

15 1991 language of the statute clearly extends th e reach of section 1981 to both private and

16 governmental action . . . .”); Zhang v. Ma Labs, Inc ., 2005 WL 889724, at *2 (N.D. Cal.

17 Apr. 15, 2005) (applying the 1991 am endment and concluding that Section 1981

18 encompasses private discrimination based on alienage).2

19 II. Joint Employment

20

The parties agree on the Ninth Circuit law governing joint employment relationships.

21 Whether an entity is a joint employer under FLSA and AWPA is a question of law.Torres-

22 Lopez v. May, 111 F.3d 633, 638 (9th Cir. 1997). The test for both statutes is the same. See

23 id. at 639 (“‘‘[J] oint em ployment’ unde r the [FLSA] is ‘joint em ployment’ under the

24 [AWPA].’”) (quoting 29 C.F.R. § 500.20(h)). Both the FLSA and AWPA “broadly” define

25

26

2 Likewise, in Duane v. Geico, the court did not analyze the 1991 am endment, but

27

nonetheless concluded that Section 1981 bars private discrimination against aliens. 37 F.3d at 1041. The court based its holding on the hist ory and legislative purpose of the statute,

28 which was intended to protect against both public and private discriimnation. Id. at 1039–44.

- 9 -

1 the employer-employee relationship.Torres-Lopez, 111 F.3d at 638–39. Under both statutes,

2 to “employ” means merely “‘to suffer or permit to work.’” Id. (quoting 29 U.S.C. § 203(g)).

3 Under this broad standard, to determine whether a joint employment relationship exists, the

4 Ninth Circuit applies an “economic reality” test. Id. at 639. This test examines the totality

5 of the circumstances and the economic reality of the situation, considering a non-exhaustive

6 list of factors. Moreau v. Air Fr. , 356 F.3d 942, 946–48 (9th Cir. 2004). These factors

7 include: (1) “[t] he nature and degre e of c ontrol of the workers;” (2) “[t] he degree of

8 supervision, direct or indirect, of the work;” (3) “[t]he power to determine the pay rates or

9 the methods of payment of the workers;” (4) “[t]he right, directly or indirectly, to hire, fire,

10 or modify the employment conditions of the workers;” (5) “[p]reparation of payroll and the

11 payment of wages[;]” (6) “whether the workwas a specialty job on the production line;” (7)

12 “whether responsibility under the contracts between a labor contractor and an epmloyer pass

13 from one labor contractor to another without material changes;” (8) “whether the premises

14 and equipment of the employer are used for the work;” (9) “whether the employees had a

15 business organization that could or did shift as a unit from one worksite to another;” (10)

16 “whether the work wa s pie cework and not work that required initiative, judgm ent or

17 foresight;” (11) “whether the employee had an opportunity for profit or loss depending upon

18 the alleged em ployee’s m anagerial skill;” (12) “whether there was perm anence in the

19 working relationship;” and (13) “whether the se rvice rendered is an integral part of the

20 alleged employer’s business.” Id. (citing 29 C.F.R. § 500.20(h); Torres-Lopez, 111 F.3d at

21 639).

22

Defendants do not dispute that Marlin Gorwers, Marlin Ranching, SAMI, and Richard

23 De Leon, as president of SAMI, were all joint epmloyers. Defendants contend, however, that

24 SAMCO, and presumably its president, Ralph De Leon, were not joint employers with these

25 other entities and individuals. While the parties agree that Defendants hired H-2A workers,

26 Defendants explain that SAMCO did not hire any of the Plaintiffs to work for Marl in

27 Growers or Marlin Ranching during the two relevant growing seasons. Construing the facts

28

- 10 -

1 in Defendants’ favor, by definition, SAMCO could not have been a joint em ployer of

2 Plaintiffs if it did not hire any Plaintiffs during the relevant growing seasons.

3

Plaintiffs assert in their Reply Brief that SAMCO has failed to present adm issible

4 evidence of these facts. But Plaintiffs, not Defendants, are the summary-judgment movants

5 and the ones with the ultimate burden of proof on this issue. Thus, Plaintiffs’ must “make

6 a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an eleemnt essential to that party’s case, and

7 on which that party will bear the burden of proof at tria l.” Celotex, 477 U.S. at 322.

8 Plaintiffs’ Motion fails to point to a piece of evidence clearly establishing that SAMCO

9 employed P laintiffs, and not m erely H-2A wo rkers, during the relevant seasons. As

10 Plaintiffs’ Motion fails to cite such evidence, sum mary judgment is inappropriate even if

11 something hidden in the record might have supported Plaintiffs’ claims. See Keenan v. Allan,

12 91 F.3d 1275, 1279 (9th Cir. 1996) (requiring that parties identify evidence with “reasonable

13 particularity” because courts are not obligated to “scour the record” to make a determination

14 at the summary judgment stage) (internal quotations omitted). Even upon the Court’s own

15 review of Plaintiffs’ Statement of Facts and accompanying documents, the record appears

16 to lack evidence clearly establishing that SAMCO employed Plaintiffs during the relevant

17 seasons. Although the record contains evidence suggesting that SAMCO had employees of

18 some type and that SAMCO had some connection to Marlin and SAMI, the Court is unaware

19 of any admissible evidence clearly delineating what type of employees SAMCO employed

20 at what times.

21

The Court likewise cannot grant sum mary judgm ent based on an argum ent that

22 SAMCO, even if it had no employees of its own, was nonetheless a joint employer by virtue

23 of its relationship with SAMI. Defendants have presented evidence sufficient to create an

24 issue of fact as to whether SAMCO exercised sufficient control and influence over SAMI to

25 be considered a joint em ployer. Richard De Leon’s affidavit states, “SAMCO had no

26 authority to control the harvest schedule of SAMI, determine the number of workers needed

27 by SAMI for harvesting, decide which days were suitable for harvesting by SAMI, inspect

28 work performed by SAMI workers, ensure that SAMI workers performed satisfactorily, or

- 11 -

1 the right to hire, fire or modify the working conditions of SAMI workers.” Doc. 199, Ex. 1.

2 The first five factors of the economic reality test, therefore, suggest that SAMCO was a not

3 joint employer solely by virtue of its relationship with SAMI. See Moreau , 356 F.3d at

4 946–48 (stating that several fac tors to consider in determ ining joint em ployment are (1)

5 “[t]he nature and degree of control of the workers;” (2) “[t]he degree of supervision, direct

6 or indirect, of the work;” (3) “[t] he power to determ ine the pay rates or the m ethods of

7 payment of the workers;” (4) “[t]he right, directly or indirectly, to hire, fire, or modify the

8 employment conditions of the workers;” (5) “[p] reparation of payroll and the paym ent of

9 wages”).3 The rem aining factors of the econom ic reality test are less applicable in

10 determining the status of multiple labor contractors engaged by a given grower or employer,

11 especially where those labor contractors have engaged entirely separate groups of workers.

12 See Moreau, 356 F.3d at 952 (noting that some factors do not translate easily to particular

13 employment relationships). Given Defendants’ evidence, the totality of the circum stances

14 require denial of summary judgment regarding whether SAMCO was a joint employer.

15 III. Fair Labor Standards Act

16

The Fair Labor Standards Act prescribes standards for, am ong other topic s, the

17 payment of a m inimum wage for hours worked. See generally 29 U.S.C. § 201, et seq.

18 Plaintiffs seek a determination that the following were compensable hours worked under the

19 FLSA: (1) the hours spent at the beginning of each day waiting in the corralon (bus station)

20 until they received orders that the lemons were ready to be picked and that they could depart

21 for the fields; (2) the tim e spent traveling from the corralon to the fields; (3) after being

22 transported to the fields, the time spent waiting in the fields for permission to begin picking

23

24

3Plaintiffs respond to Richa rd De Leon’s affidavit only by challenging it as overly

25 conclusory. Evidence produced a t the sum mary judgment stage m ust be adm issible and based on personal knowledge, Fed. R. Civ. P. 56(e)(1), as well as more than “unsupported
26 conjecture or conclusory statem ents.” Hernandez v. Spacelabs Med. Inc. , 343 F.3d 1107,

27

1112 (9th Cir. 2003). Give n the context of the affidavit and Richard De Leon’s position within SAMI, this statem ent is m ore than a conclusory assertion. The affidavit also

28 highlights specific facts relating to SAMI and the degree of control that SAMCO exercised.

- 12 -

1 lemons; a nd ( 4) the tim e spent being trans ported from one field to another during the

2 workday.

3

Defendants do not dispute that the latter two situations constitute compensable time

4 worked under the FLSA. See 29 C.F.R. § 785.38 (“Time spent by an employee in travel as

5 part of his principal activity, such as travel fromjob site to job site during the workday, must

6 be counted as hours worked. Where an employee is required to report at a meeting place to

7 receive instructions or to performother work there, or to pick up and to carry tools, the travel

8 from the designated place to the work place is part of the day's work, and must be counted

9 as hours worked regardless of contract, custom , or practice.”); Gonzalez v. Tanimura &

10 Antle, Inc., 2008 WL 4446536, at *12 (D. Ariz. Sept. 30, 2008) (holding that the time spent

11 waiting in the fields for permission to begin harvesting was compensable under the FLSA

12 because the workers were unable to perform personal activitie s). The parties do dispute,

13 however, whether the time spent waiting in the corralon and traveling from the corralon to

14 the fields is compensable.

15

A. Waiting Time at the Corralon

16

The FLSA requires that employers pay employees the federal minimum wage for time

17 spent “engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce, or [] employed in

18 an enterprise engaged in commerce or in the production of goods for commerce.” 29 U.S.C.

19 § 206(a). An em ployee’s waiting time is compensable if the em ployee was “‘engaged to

20 wait,’” but not if the em ployee was “‘wait[ing] to be engaged.’” Owens v. Local No. 169,

21 Ass'n of W. Pulp & Paper Workers, 971 F.2d 347, 350 (9th Cir. 1992) (citing Skidmore v.

22 Swift & Co. , 323 U.S. 134, 137 (1944)). In other words, an em ployee’s waiting tim e is

23 compensable if he or she is “unable to use tehtime effectively for his [or her]own purposes.”

24 29 C.F.R. § 785.15. This is a fact-intensive analysis, as it is difficult to “‘lay down a legal

25 formula to resolve cases so varied in their facts.’B” righam v. Eugene Water & Elec. Bd,.357

26 F.3d 931, 935 (9th Cir. 2004) q(uoting Skidmore, 323 U.S. at 136)). “‘[Fa]cts may show that

27 the employee was ‘engaged to wait,’ which is com pensable, or they m ay show that the

28 employee ‘waited to be engaged,’ which is not compensable.’” Id. (quotingOwens, 971 F.2d

- 13 -

1 at 350 (quotingSkidmore, 323 U.S. at 137));see also Birdwell v. City of Gladsden, Ala,.970

2 F.2d 802, 808 (11th Cir. 1992) (“Certain sets of afcts, if found by a fact finder, will give rise

3 to liability under the FLSA while other sets of facts will not. It is for the court to determine

4 if a set of facts gives rise to liability; it is for the jury to determ ine if those facts exist.” In

5 evaluating the facts, two critical factors are to be considered: “‘(1) the degree to which the

6 employee is free to engage in personal ac tivities; and (2) the agr eements between the

7 parties.’” Berry v. County of Sonoma, 30 F.3d 1174, 1180 (9th Cir. 1994) (quoting Owens,

8 971 F.2d at 350).

9

1. Degree of freedom to engage in personal activities

10

With respect to the first factor, the Ninth Circuit has enumerated an illustrative list of

11 factors relevant to determining the degree to which an employee is free to engage in personal

12 activities:

13

(1) whether there was an on-prem ises living requirement; (2) whether there

were excessive geographical restric tions on em ployee’s m ovements; (3)

14

whether the frequency of calls was unduly restrictive; (4) whether a fixed tiem

limit for response was unduly restrictive; (5) whe ther the on-call em ployee

15

could easily trade on-call responsibilities; (6) whether the use of a pager could

ease re strictions; and (7) whether the em ployee had actually engaged in

16

personal activities during call-in time.

17 Owens, 971 F.2d at 351. Not all of these factors translate directly to the parties’ epmloyment

18 relationship, but the factors on the whole weigh in Plaintiffs’ favor.

19

Gonzalez v. Tanimura & Antle, Inc.addressed a group of plaintiffs who, like Plaintiffs

20 in the present case, worked as harvesters and voluntarily rode their em ployers’ bus to the

21 harvesting fields each day. 2008 WL 4446536 (D. Ariz. Sept. 30, 2008). On icy days, the

22 vegetables would be unsuitable for picking in the morning, and the employees who took the

23 bus were required to wait for the buses to arrive later in the day. Id. at *1–2. The court

24 reasoned that the plaintiffs lacked substantial freedom to engage in per sonal a ctivities

25 because they were required to stay near the bus stop or else they m ight miss the buses and

26 thus a day’s wages; while the plaintiffs could visit stores and perform other “time-filling”

27 activities near the bus stop, they could not domany of the activities they would normally be

28 able to do near their home communities. Id. at *12.

- 14 -

1

Likewise, Plaintiffs in this case offer evidence that they were, as a practical m atter,

2 required to stay geographically near the bus sotp and were unable to use their time effectively

3 for their own purposes. While Plaintiffs were able to frequent food vendors, stores, and other

4 facilities within the vicinity, these activities, as Gonzalez noted, are often sim ply “time-

5 filling” activities. 2008 WL 4446536, at *12. Moreover, those Plaintiffs who chose to take

6 the bus were required to arrive at the corralon at a particular time each day. On days when

7 the buses were late, Plaintiffs could not read ily leave the area or otherwise avoid their

8 waiting time because no one knew what tim e the buses would be ready to depart for the

9 fields. Neither present any evidence that Plaintiffs had an alternative method of discovering

10 what time the buses would depart or a t what time and location they should report to the

11 fields, therefore limiting the requirement that they wait for the bus while unable to perform

12 other activities. To be sure, Defendants assert that Plaintiffs here, like the plaintif fs in

13 Gonzalez, technically were not ordered to take the bus. 2008 WL 4446536, at *12.

14 Nevertheless, those Plaintiffs who followed Defendants’ strong recommendation and took

15 the bus were required to arrive at the corralon at a particular time and to wait there without

16 a realistic option for leaving until the buses arrived, even if the buses did not arrive at the

17 scheduled tim e. The Owens factors suggest that Plaintiffs la cked e xtensive freedom to

18 engage in personal activities on days when the buses were late.

19

2. Agreements between the parties

20

Determining the degree of freedom, however, does not end the Court’s analysis. The

21 other “predominant factor[]” is the agreements between the parties. Berry, 30 F.3d at 1180

22 (citing Owens, 971 F.2d at 350). In analyzing the ag reements between the parties, courts

23 examine, for example, the “construction of the agreements between the particular parties, .

24 . . their practical construction of the working agreement by conduct, [and] consideration of

25 the nature of the service.” Skidmore, 323 U.S. at 137. In this context, the Ninth Circuit has

26 recognized three different types of agreements between employers and employees. Berry, 30

27 F.3d at 1180. Defendants argue that only one type of agreement, a constructive agreement,

28

- 15 -

1 is relevant in this case. 4 “A constructive agreem ent m ay arise if em ployees have been

2 informed of the . . . compensation policy and continue to work under the disclosed terms of

3 the policy.” Id. (citing Owens, 971 F.2d at 354–55).

4

Here, an issue of fact exists as to whether the parties had a constructive agreem ent

5 regarding the compensation of wait time. Plaintiffs provide evidence that they frequently had

6 to wait at the corralon without pay, a practice not required by the ir previous em ployers.

7 These facts, however, do not negate the possibility that the parties nonetheless had a

8 constructive agreement not to com pensate wait tim e at the corralon. Defendants present

9 Richard De Leon’s affidavit, which indicates that neither S AMI nor other harvesting

10 companies paid or agreed to pay farm workers for wait tim e at bus stops. This affidavit

11 further provides that “workers were inform ed” of the hourly and piece rates and that,

12 “[c]onsistent with . . . long-standing custom and practice[,] . . . [w]orkers were not paid for

13 time spent waiting at the bus stop or traveling to the groves and . . . were never inform ed

14 otherwise by any representative of SAMI.” (Do.c199, Ex. 1). Richard De Leon further avers

15 that he never received notice that any em ployee ever complained about the lack of

16 compensation for wait tim es. Several issues, therefore, rem ain unresolve d: whether the

17 parties understood that certain tim e was not com pensable; whether each em ployee was

18 informed of the alleged policy; whether Plaintiffs complained about the alleged policy, and

19 whether Plaintiffs continued to work in acceptance of the alleged policy.

20

The lack of clarity regarding the parties’ agreem ents m akes sum mary judgm ent

21 inappropriate regarding the compensability of wait time at the corralon. “The significance

22 and importance of evaluating the agreements between the parties is that the existence of such

23 agreements assists the trier of fact in determining whether the parties characterized the time

24 spent waiting on-call as actual work.” Berry, 30 F.3d at 1180–81. While the parties’

25

26

4 The other two main agreement types are an actual agreement pursuant to a collective

27

bargaining agreement and an express agreement based on employees voluntarily becoming employed after a compensation policy has been implemented. Berry, 30 F.3d at 1180 (citing

28 Owens, 971 F.2d at 355).

- 16 -

1 agreements are less relevant where there is “no uncertainty that the uncompensated time at

2 issue . . . was actually work,”id. (citing Tenn. Coal, Iron & R.R. Co. v. Muscoda Local No.

3 123, 321 U.S. 590, 602–04 (1944)), the existence of a constructive agreem ent would be

4 highly relevant here bec ause there remains at least som e uncertainty regarding Plaintiffs’

5 freedom to engage in personal activities. Therefore, the fact that the Owens factors weigh

6 in Plaintiffs’ favor does not compel the Court to ignore the possibility that a reasonable jury

7 could find, when considering the possibility of a constructive agreem ent, that certain wait

8 times were not com pensable. As such an agreem ent would be highly relevant, the Court

9 finds the issue more properly submitted to a jury.5

10

B. Travel Time From the Corralon to the Fields

11

Plaintiffs seek com pensation for the tim e spent traveling from the corralon to the

12 fields on days where they were required to wait in the corralon until the fields were ready to

13 be harvested. Plaintiffs explicitly do not seek com pensation for travel time on days when

14 they voluntarily arrived at the corralon and we re immediately bused to the fields, as such

15 time likely would not be com pensable. See 29 U.S.C. § 254(a) (stating that the following

16 activities are not compensable: “(1) walking, riding, or traveling to and fromthe actual place

17 of performance of the principal activity or activities which such em ployee is employed to

18 perform, and (2) activities which are preliminary to or postliminary to said principal activity

19 or activities”); 29 C.F.R. § 785.35 (“An employee who travels fromhome before his [or her]

20 regular workday and returns to his [or her] home at the end of the workday is engaged in

21 ordinary home to work travel which is a normal incident of employment. This is true whether

22 he [or she] works at a fixed location or a t different job sites. Norm al travel from home to

23 work is not worktime.”).

24

25

5 Gonzalez, which concluded that wait time at a bus stop was compensable, does not

dictate a contrary result. 2008 WL 4446536, at *9–13. The court in Gonzalez was able to

26 discern that no im plied agreement existed. Id. at * 11. The facts there indicated that the

27

plaintiffs were required to report to the bus sotp at a particular time and were not made aware of any policy regarding the compensation of wait time. Id. The facts in the present case are

28 not so crystallized, and summary judgment, therefore, is inappropriate.

- 17 -

1

Instead, Plaintiffs argue in their Response taht their travel time should be compensated

2 only on days they were required to wait at the corralon for the leomns to be ready for harvest.

3 Plaintiffs assert that their travel tim e is c ompensable if it occurs within the confines of a

4 “continuous workday.” Plaintiffs cite 29 C.F.R. § 785.38, which states in pertinent part,

5 “Where an employee is required to report at a m eeting place to receive instructions or to

6 perform other work there, or to pick up and to carry tools, the travel from the designated

7 place to the work place is part of the day’s work, and m ust be counted as hours worked.”

8 Plaintiffs contend that, on days the buses were delayed, their “workdays” began as soon as

9 they were required to wait at the c orralon for their em ployers’ benefit. Thus, Plaintiffs

10 maintain that the travel time on the bus is compensable to the extent it took place within the

11 workday under 29 C.F.R. § 785.38.

12

The Court, however, need not decide at this point whether such travel time would be

13 compensable if it occurred after Plaintiffs waitde at the corralon. As the Court has explained,

14 an issue of fact exists as to whether th e initial wait time at the bus stop was com pensable

15 work time or noncompensable free time. As a result, the Court cannot determ ine whether

16 Plaintiffs’ waiting time began the “workday” and thus cannot hold, as a matter of law, that

17 any travel tim e from the bus stop to the fiel ds occurred entirely within the bounds of the

18 workday pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 785.38. The Court, therefore, denies summary judgment

19 regarding travel time from the corralon to the fields.

20 IV. Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act

21

AWPA provides various la bor protections for m igrant and seasonal agricultural

22 workers, including requirements that employers pay certain wages, keep accurate records,

23 avoid providing false or misleading information, and prevent disparate treatment of United

24 States agricultural workers. See generally 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq. Pla intiffs argue that

25 Defendants violated AWPA in four ways: (1) by failing to pay wages owed when due in

26 violation of 29 U.S.C. § 1832(a), (2) by failing to m ake, keep, and preserve records of the

27 hours spent waiting at various times in violation of § 1831(c), (3) by knowingly providing

28 false or m isleading information to Plaintiffs in violation of § 1831(e), and (4) by giving

- 18 -

1 preferential treatme nt to alien workers in violation of their working arrangem ent and §

2 1832(c).

3

A. Failure To Pay Wages Owed When Due

4

29 U.S.C. § 1832(a) provides, “Each farm labor contractor, agricultural employer, and

5 agricultural association which employs any seasonal agricultural worker shall pay the wages

6 owed to such worker when due.” Plaintiffs argue that, to the extent the FLSA requires wages

7 to be paid, Defendants are likewise liable under Section 1832(a) for failure to pay “wages

8 owed.” A violation of Section 1832(a) occurs when wages are due under either federal or

9 state wage and hour laws.Doe v. D.M. Camp & Sons, 624 F. Supp.2d 1153, 1168 (E.D. Cal.

10 2008) (“Wages may be defined by federal, state, and local laws. Failure by an employer to

11 pay those wages constitute[s] violations of AWPA.”); see also Medrano v. D’Arrigo Bros.

12 Co. of Cal., 125 F. Supp.2d 1163, 1166–67 (N.D. Ca l. 2000) (noting that Section 1832(a)

13 “simply provides that wa ges must be paid when due, without lim iting the source of the

14 obligation”). Specifically, a “finding of liability on [Pla]intiffs’ FLSA claims ipso facto leads

15 to the conclusion” that Defenda nts also violated AWPA. See Smith v. Bonds , 1993 WL

16 556781, at *8 (E.D. N.C. Sept. 28, 1993) (addressing liability under 29 U.S.C. § 1822, which

17 also requires that employers “shall pay the wages owed to [m igrant agricultural workers]

18 when due”). Therefore, to the extent Plainti ffs can prove at trial that certain wages we re

19 owed under state or federal law, Plaintiffs may establish that Defendants violated AWPA.

20

Defendants next argue that, while dam ages m ay be available under 29 U.S.C. §

21 1854(c), “m ultiple recoveries based upon multiple statutory theories should not be

22 countenanced.” (Doc. 198 at 10). As Defendants offer no legal or factual basis for this

23 argument, the Court need not deny sum mary judgment on AWPA on this ground alone.

24 Nonetheless, the Court notes that, at least in certain circumstances, statutory damages under

25 § 1854(c) may be available even where actual damages are recoverable under other statutes

26 without constituting “double recovery.”See Martinez v. Shinn, 992 F.2d 997, 1001 (9th Cir.

27 1993) (affirm ing award of dam ages for unpaid back pa y under state law and statutory

28

- 19 -

1 damages under AWPA for failure to pay wages when due because the two awards were based

2 on different compensation theories).

3

B. Failure To Make, Keep, and Preserve Records

4

AWPA requires employers to “make, keep, andpreserve records for three years of . . .

5 the number of piecework units earned, if paid on a piecework basis[,] [and] the number of

6 hours worked” by each worker. 29 U.S.C. § 1831(c)(1)(B)–(C). Plaintiffs contend that

7 Defendants violated this section by failing to record Plaintiffs’ wait time at the corralon and

8 by inaccurately accounting for the variation in the number of hours worked.

9

With respect the recording of wait time at the corralon, Defendants do not appear to

10 dispute that they neglected to record the time Plaintiffs spent waiting for the buses to arrive.

11 Nonetheless, if the wait time at the corralonwas not compensable, then Defendants could not

12 have violated AWPA by failing to record such time. Accordingly, because the Court finds

13 an issue of material fact regarding whether the wait time at the corralon is compensable, the

14 Court likewise denies summary judgment regarding Defendants’ failure to record such time

15 under AWPA.

16

Regarding the other alleged inaccuracies, Plaintiffs offer evidence indicating that

17 Defendants evaded record-keeping requirements. This theory is based largely on allegations

18 that Defendants’ records include wide variation in the num ber of hours worke d by

19 employees. Nonetheless, Defendants correctly argue that dam ages under AWPA are

20 inappropriate because, even if they violated record-keeping provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1831,

21 “[o]nly ‘intentional’ violations of the []AWPA subject a defendant to liability for damages.”

22 Rodriguez v . Carlson , 943 F. Supp. 1263, 1271 (E.D. Wash. 1996) (citing 29 U.S.C.

23 § 1854(c)). “Intentional” in this context isa “conscious and deliberate violation of the Act.”

24 Id. (citing Bueno v. Mattner, 829 F.2d 1380, 1385–86 (6th Cir. 1987)); see also Alvarez v.

25 Longboy, 697 F.2d 1333, 1338 (9th Cir. 1 983) (defining “intentional” for purposes of the

26 Farm Labor Contractors Registration Act, the predecessor of AW PA, as “conscious or

27 deliberate”). At the same time, a plaintiff need not prove “specific intent by defendants to

28 violate the [] AWPA,” as the “intentional” requireme nt “ has been construed liberally to

- 20 -

1 impose liability on individuals for the natural conseque nces of their acts.” Rodriguez, 943

2 F. Supp. at 1271 (citingBueno, 829 F.2d at 1386 (citingRivera v. Adams Packing Ass’n, 707

3 F.2d 1278, 1283 (11th Cir. 1983))). For instance, a recording violation is generally

4 intentional if the error is made by, or at the direction of, management personnel who have

5 knowledge of the mistakes in the records. See Wales v. Jack M. Berry, Inc., 192 F. Supp.2d

6 1269, 1288 (M.D. Fla. 1999) (holding that the failure to keep accurate records was

7 intentional insofar as it resulted from changes deliberately made by management, but was

8 unintentional to the extent the errors did not result from management’s instructions).

9

Defendants have presented evidence creating anissue of fact as to whether Defendants

10 acted intentionally. Richard De Leon’s affida vit asserts that he was unaware of any

11 falsification of employment records and that neither he, nor any of his agents, instructed that

12 any records be falsified. Like the defendants inWales, 192 F. Supp.2d at 1288, Defendants

13 here would not be liable if they did not direct anyone to create inaccurate records and if they

14 were unaware of any alleged inaccuracies. Richard De Leon further explains that SAMI

15 lacked any incentive to under-report hours worked because to do so would reduce the oaumnt

16 paid to SAMI by Marlin Growers. Because Marlin Growers paid SAMI based on the work

17 SAMI reported that its employees performed, a reasonable jury could find that SAMI lacked

18 any incentive to intentionally under-report em ployees’ hours. Although, as Plaintiffs

19 suggest, an insidious motive also could be contemplated from these facts, such matters are

20 inappropriate for resolution on sum mary judgm ent. See Anderson , 477 U.S. at 248

21 (explaining that credibility determinations, the weighing of the evidence, and the drawing of

22 legitimate inferences are jury functions). Therefore, even if, as Defendants acknowledge,

23 some variation in the records m ight have exis ted, an issue of fact exists as to whether

24 Defendants consciously and deliberately violated the Act.

25

C. Knowingly Providing False or Misleading Information

26

29 U.S.C. § 1831(e) prohibits an agricultural employer from “knowingly provid[ing]

27 false or misleading information to any seasonal agricultural worker concerning the term s,

28 conditions, or existence of agricultural employment required to be disclosed by [ §

- 21 -

1 1831(a)–(c)]. To be sure, a claimunder this subsection may be based on the alleged under-

2 reporting of hours on Plaintiffs’ wage statements. Sanchez-Calderon v. Moorhouse Farms,

3 995 F. Supp. 1098, 1105 (D. Or. 1997) (analyzing a sim ilar provision under 29 U.S.C. §

4 1821(f)). Nonetheless, the Court has already determined that an issue of fact exists regarding

5 whether Defendants knowingly and/or intentionallymisstated Plaintiffs’ hours. For the same

6 reason, summary judgment is inappropriate on the Section 1831(e) claim.

7

D. Giving Preferential Treatment to Alien Workers

8

Plaintiffs argue that Defendants violated 29 U.S.C. § 1832(c) by giving preferential

9 treatment to alien workers, which Plaintiffs contend violated the “working arrangement,” or

10 employment contract, between Defendants and Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs allege that Defendants

11 employed both Plaintiffs and tem porary foreign labor under the H-2A progra m and that

12 Defendants failed to offer Plaintiffs the same employment terms and wages as were offered

13 to the foreign laborers. Specifically, Plaintiffs contend Defendants offered H-2A workers,

14 but did not offer Plaintiffs, higher per-hour wages, free housing, and written contracts of

15 employment.

16

Section 1832(c) provides, “No farm labor contractor, agricultural em ployer, or

17 agricultural association shall, without justification, violat e the term s of any working

18 arrangement made by that contractor, employer, or association with any seasonal agricultural

19 worker.” 29 U.S.C. § 1832(c ). Plaintiffs do not argue that som e specific working

20 arrangement between the parties explicitly prohbiited preferential treatment of alien workers.

21 Instead, Plaintiffs argue that their “working arrangem ent” with Defendants necessarily

22 incorporated applicable federal labor law, including 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(a) (2010)6. At the

23 time the Motion was filed, Section 655.102(a) provided in pertinent part, “The employer’s

24 job offer to U.S. workers shall offer the U.S. workers no less than the same benefits, wages,

25 and working conditions which the employer is offering, intends to offer, or will provide to

26

27

6 20 C.F.R. §655.102 has since been am ended, but the Court conside rs the prior

version of this Section for purposes of this Motion. All future citations in this regulation are

28 to this edition.

- 22 -

1 H-2A workers.” 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(a).

2

As a preliminary matter, summary judgment is inappropriate as against SAMCO. As

3 discussed supra Section I, an issue of fact exists as to whether SAMCO em ployed any

4 Plaintiffs. If SAMCO did not em ploy Plaintiffs, no claim for disparate tre atment under §

5 655.102(a) exists.

6

Summary judgm ent likewise is appropriate as against the rem aining Defendants

7 because the requirements of 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(a) are not necessarily incorporated into the

8 parties’ working arrangement. Multiple district courts within the Ninth Circuit have held that

9 the “working arrangement” discussed in AWPA does not autom atically incorporate other

10 labor laws. Doe v. D.M. Camp & Sons , 624 F. Supp.2d 1153, 1169 (E.D. Cal. 2008)

11 (explaining that a working arrangement includes only those terms communicated between

12 the parties); Valenzuela v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp., 619 F. Supp.2d 985, 990 (E.D. Cal.

13 2008) (holding that “working a rrangements should be understood as the contract term s

14 between the employer and employee”) (citing Barajas v. Bermudez, 43 F.3d 1251, 1257 (9th

15 Cir. 1994)); Robles v. Sunview Vineyards of Cal., Inc., 2008 WL 895945, at *6 (E.D. Cal.

16 Mar. 31, 2008) (holding that, because Congress intended that “working arrangements [be]

17 created in the interaction between” the employer and the employee, “a working arrangement

18 under AWPA constitutes the term s of employment communicated between employer and

19 employee[] [and] does not autom atically encompass any and all statutes and regula tions

20 governing agricultural em ployment”); see also Sanchez v. Overmyer , 845 F. Supp. 1183,

21 1187 n. 3 (N.D. Ohio 1993) (holding that, while the term“wage” incorporated requirements

22 under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act, a “working arrangem ent” referred to the

23 “express terms of a working arrangement as opposed to those implied by law”). Hence, a

24 working arrangement includes only those terms that are communicated to the employer. See

25 Valenzuela, 619 F. Supp.2d at 990;Doe, 624 F. Supp.2d at 1169;Robles, 2008 WL 895945,

26 at *6; Sanchez, 845 F. Supp. at 1187. A few out-of-cir cuit cases have concluded that a

27 working arrangem ent m ay im pliedly include statutory requirem ents. See, e.g. , Aviles v .

28 Kunkle, 765 F. Supp. 358, 366 (S.D. Tex. 1991).

- 23 -

1

Nonetheless, the Court is reluctant to conclude at the sum mary judgment stage that

2 the parties’ working arrangement necessarily incorporates 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(a). To be

3 sure, the communication of terms required in a working arrangement “need not necessarily

4 be verbal or in writing[,]” as “an accepted custom or practice that the employer enforces and

5 the employee follows can also qualify as an implicitly communicated term.” Valenzuela, 619

6 F. Supp.2d at 993 (citingColon v. Casco, Inc., 716 F. Supp. 688, 690 (D. Mass. 1989)). But

7 Plaintiffs have offered no legal or factual argument that the disparate-impact requirements

8 of 20 C.F.R. § 655.102(a) were communicated to Plaintiffs, either explicitly or im plicitly,

9 sufficient to incorporate those requirements into the working arrangement.7 Accordingly,

10 Plaintiffs’ Motion regarding its claim under 29 U.S.C. § 1832(c) is denied.

11 V. California Wage Laws

12

On some days, Plaintiffs worked for Defendants in California, rather than in Arizona.

13 With respect to those days, Plaintiffs contend that Defendants violated Section 203 of the

14 California Labor Code and California Indutsrial Welfare Commission Wage Order No. 14-80

15 (“Wage Order No. 14-80”), which is codified at Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 11140.

16 Specifically, Plaintiffs allege that Defendants failed to record and to compensate time spent

17 traveling to and from the fields and time spent waiting in the corralon and in the fields.

18

A. Waiting and Travel Time

19

While California’s wage laws include m any of the sam e protections as do federal

20 labor laws, interpretation of the California statutory scheme does not necessarily mirror that

21 of the federal scheme. Morillion v. Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal.4th 575, 588, 995 P.2d 139

22 (2000). “Wage Order No. 14-80 requires an agricultural em ployer to pay agricultural

23 workers a specified minimum wage for ‘all hours worked.’”Medrano v. D’Arrigo Bros. Co.

24 of Cal., 336 F. Supp.2d 1053, 1057 (N.D. Cal. 2004) (citing 8 Cal. Code. Regs. tit. 8, §

25 11140(4)); Morillion v. Royal Packing Co., 22 Cal.4th 575, 587 (2000)). “Hours worked” is

26

27

7 Plaintiffs appear to m ake a sim ilar argument that Defendants violated a working

arrangement by failing to pay wages owed wh en due under 29 U.S.C. § 1832(a). For the

28 same reasons set forth above, this argument fails.

- 24 -

1 defined as “the time during which an employee is subject to the control of an employer, []

2 includ[ing] all the tim e the em ployee is suffered or perm itted to work, whether or not

3 required to do so.” Cal. Code. Regs. tit. 8, § 11140(2)(G).

4

Compensable non-production time generally includes the following: (1) compulsory

5 travel time, (2) time spent waiting at a departure point, such as a corralon, and (3) time spent

6 waiting in the fields.See Gonzalez, 2008 WL 4446536, at *17 (awarding summary judgment

7 in plaintiffs’ favor because the “[pl]aintiffs were under [d]efendant’s control during the time

8 [p]laintiffs[] spent in or near [d]efendant’s parking lot and in the field waiting” to be able to

9 begin harvesting); Medrano, 336 F. Supp.2d at 1057 (“[A]ll time that agricultural workers

10 spend under the employer’s control—including specifically compulsory travel and waiting

11 time—must be considered ‘hours worked’ pursuant to Wage Order No. 14-80.”)M; orillion,

12 22 Cal.4th at 594 (“[C]ompulsory travel time is compensable as ‘hours worked.’”). To the

13 extent Plaintiffs can produce evidence that they waited in the fields in California for the

14 lemons to be ready for harvesting, Defendantsdo not dispute that such time is compensable.

15 Defendants further do not dispute that, to the extent travel tim e within California was

16 compulsory, it is compensable.8

17

Defendants, however, argue that travel and wait tim e are com pensable only to the

18 extent these activities took place within California. It is undisputed that the wait time at the

19 corralon in San Luis necessarily took pl ace outside of California and that all but

20 approximately eight miles of travel per trip occurred outside of California.

21

22

23

8 Although California law makes clear that “compulsory travel time” is compensable,

California courts have noted that optional travel time is not compensable. See Morillion, 22 24 Cal.4th at 594 (noting that “employers may provide optional free transportation to employees

25 without having to pay them for their travel tim e, as long as em ployers do not require employees to use this transportation”);Overton v. Walt Disney Co,. 38 Cal. Rptr.3d 693, 699
26 (Ct. App. 2006) (concluding tha t tim e spent on an optional com pany shuttle was not

27

compensable). But see Gonzalez, 2008 WL 4446536, at *17 (holding that time spent waiting for an optional bus was com pensable to the extent plaintiffs were under the de fendant’s

28 control).

- 25 -

1

The extent to which the California Labor Code and the accompanying Wage Orders

2 apply to work perform ed outside of Californi a is not clearly established. The California

3 Supreme Court has explained that “California em ployment la ws im plicitly extend to

4 employment occurring within California’s state law boundaries.”Tidewater Marine W., Inc.

5 v. Bradshaw, 927 P.2d 296, 301 (Cal. 1996). The court in Tidewater went on to hold that

6 California’s wage laws apply to em ployees who reside in California, receive pay in

7 California, and work in California.Id. at 309 (“If an employee resides in California, receives

8 pay in California, and works exclusively, or principally, in California, then that employee is

9 a ‘wage earner of California’ and presumptively enjoys the protection of IWC regulations.”);

10 see also United Air Lines, Inc. v. Indus. We lfare Comm’n, 28 Cal. Rptr. 238, 248–49 (Ct.

11 App. 1963) (explaining that IWC regulations apply to persons who are dom iciled in

12 California but work principally outside the state)T;he 2002 Update of the DLSE Enforcement

13 Policies and Interpretations Manual ( Revised) (“Absent a conflict with federal law, and

14 subject to proper interpretation of the IWC Orde rs in light of the existence of territorial

15 boundaries and potentia l c onflicts with the laws of other jurisdictions, the IWC Orders

16 presumptively cover individuals who are dom iciled in California but who work pa rtly or,

17 under some circumstances, even principally, outside the state.”).

18

Tidewater left unsettled the issue of the extent to which California wage laws apply

19 to non-residents for the lim ited time spent working in Ca lifornia. The court in Tidewater

20 explained that it was “not prepared . . . to hold that IWC wage orders apply to

all

21 employment in California .” 927 P.2d at 309. For instance, the court speculated that the

22 Legislature may have intended extraterritorial enforcement of wage orders when “California

23 residents working for a California employer travel temporarily outside the state during the

24 course of the norm al workday but return to California at the end of the da y,” while “the

25 Legislature m ay not have intended IWC wage orders to govern out-of-state businesses

26 employing nonresidents, though the nonresident em ployees enter California tem porarily

27 during the course of the workday.” Id.

28

- 26 -

1

Nonetheless, according toTidewater, “California’s territorial boundaries are relevant

2 to determining whether IWC wage orders apply.”Id. Other courts have similarly concluded

3 that the place where the work takes place is the critical issue.See Sarviss v. Gen. Dynamics

4 Info. Tech., Inc. , 663 F. Supp.2d 883, 900 (C.D. Cal. 2009) (focusing on the “situs of

5 employment as opposed to residence of the employee or the employer” and holding that work

6 performed outside of California by a California resident was not covered by California wage

7 laws); Priyanto v. M/S Amsterdam , 2009 WL 175739, at *6–8 (C.D. Cal. Jan. 23, 2009)

8 (holding that California wage laws did not apply where plaintiffs were unable to show that

9 they worked in California); cf. Tidenberg v. Bidz.com, Inc., 2009 WL 605249, at *4 (C.D.

10 Cal. Mar. 4, 2009) (explaining that California’s Unfair Com petition Law and False

11 Advertising Law apply to “unlawful conduct [that]took place in California” because “state

12 statutory remedies may be invoked by out-of-state parties when they are haremd by wrongful

13 conduct occurring in California”);Guillory v. Princess Cruise Lines, Ltd,.2007 WL 102851,

14 at *2–5 (Cal. Ct. App. Jan 17, 2007) (holding that the California Fair Em ployment a nd

15 Housing Act did not apply because no part of the appellant’s employment was performed in

16 California); Peikin v. Kimmel & Silverman, P.C. , 576 F. Supp.2d 654, (D. N.J. 2008)

17 (concluding that New Jersey’s employment-discrimination law did not protect a non-resident

18 from discriminatory acts undertaken in Pennsylvania even though the employee sometimes

19 conducted business in New Jersey).

20

In this case, while the parties do not dispute that California wage laws apply to work

21 performed in California, Plaintiffs offer no persuasive argument that time spent waiting or

22 traveling in Arizona is compensable under California law. The only authority Plaintiffs cite

23 to this effect is Sullivan v. Oracle Corp., 557 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2009). Sullivan, however,

24 made no holding on the a pplicability of California wage laws to out-of-state work, but

25 instead certified to the California Supreme Court three questions regarding the applicability

26 of California’s Unfair Competition Law to overtime work performed both inside and outside

27 of California. Even assuming the California Supreme Court’s pending decision regarding

28 the territorial scope of California’ s Unfair Competition Law would effect the scope of its

- 27 -

1 wage laws, the certification inSullivan stands at most for the proposition that California law

2 remains unclear, but does not suggest that work perform ed outside of California would be

3 compensable in the present case. Therefore, while Defendants violated California’s wage

4 laws to the extent Plaintiffs can prove at trial that they performed compensable but unpaid

5 wait and/or travel time within California, the Court deniessummary judgment regarding the

6 time spent waiting and traveling outside of California.

7

B. “Willful” Violation of Cal. Lab. Code § 203

8

To the extent travel and wait time is compensable under California law, Plaintiffs

9 further seek summary judgment that Defendants incurred statutory penalties under Section

10 203 of the California Labor Code. Section 203(a) provides in pertinent part:

11

If an em ployer willfully fails to pay, without abatem ent or reduction, in

accordance with Section[] 201 . . . any wages of an em ployee who is

12

discharged or who quits, the wages of the employee shall continue as a penalty

from the due date thereof at the same rate until paid or until an action therefor

13

is commenced; but the wages shall not continue for more than 30 days.

14 Cal. Lab. Code § 203(a).9

15

Although Defendants do not dispute that statutory penalties may be available for the

16 willful failure to pay wages, Defendants argue that any failure was not made “willfully,” as

17 required by Section 203(a). “‘[Wi]llful’ merely means that the employer intentionally failed

18 or refused to perform an act which was required to be done [,]” a nd does not require a

19 “deliberate evil purpose.”Armenta v. Osmose, Inc,. 37 Cal. Rptr.3d 460, 469 (Ct. App. 2005)

20 (internal quotations omitted). However, a “‘good faith dispute’ that any wages are due will

21 preclude imposition of waiting time penalties.’”Campbell v. PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP,

22 602 F. Supp.2d 1163, 1185 (E.D. Cal. 2009) (quoting Cal. Code Regs. tit 8, § 13520).

23

To the extent Plaintiffs can prove at trial that they performed travel and wait time in

24 California and that Defendants intentionally refused to compensate them for that time, then

25 Defendants’ conduct was willful. Although Defendants may not have had a “deliberate evil

26

27

9 Section 201(a) of Labor Code states in pertinent part, “If an employer discharges an

employee, the wages earned and unpaid a t the time of discharge are due and payable

28 immediately.” Cal. Lab. Code § 201(a).

- 28 -

1 purpose,” Plaintiffs will have to prove only that Defendants “intentionally failed or refused

2 to” pay wages for work perform ed in California—an act that Defendants concede “was

3 required to be done.” See Armenta , 37 Cal. Rptr.3d at 469. Although the Court denies

4 summary judgment because underlying questions of fact relate to whether Plaintiffs can

5 prove these elements, the Court rejects any s uggestion that Plaintiffs m ust prove any evil

6 purpose or specific intent to violate a statute.

7

On the other hand, with respect to work perform ed outside of California, summary

8 judgment in Plaintiffs’ favor is inappropriate. As the Court has already explained, California

9 wage law does not necessarily apply to work performed outside of California. Accordingly,

10 Defendants would have had a “good faith dispute” as to whether any such wages were owed.

11 See Campbell, 602 F. Supp.2d at 1185s;ee also Cervantez v. Celestica Corp,.618 F. Supp.2d

12 1208, 1221 (C.D. Cal. 2009) (holding that employers did not commit a willful violation to

13 pay wages under Section 203 of the California Labor Code because plaintiffs had not

14 presented evidence of a violation at all).

15

C. Record-keeping Under Cal. Lab. Code § 204.3(f)

16

Plaintiffs contend that Defendants violated the record-keeping provisions of Section

17 204.3(f) of the California Labor Code. That section provides, “Every employer shall keep

18 records that accurately reflect compensating time earned and used.” Cal. Lab. Code § 204.3.

19 Although Defendants may have failed to keep certain records, Plaintiffs fail to explain the

20 applicability of Section 204.3. First, Section 204.3 addresses compensating time off in lieu

21 of overtime compensation. Id. “[ C]ompensating time” refers to “hours during which an

22 employee is not working, which are not counted as hours worked during the applicable

23 workweek or other work period for purposes of overtime compensation, and for which the

24 employee is compensated at the employee’s regular rate.” Id. § 204.3(g). Plaintiffs do not

25 explain how com pensating tim e is rele vant to th is case. This statute further appears

26 inapposite because it does “not apply to any em ployee who is subject to . . . [Wage Order

27 No.] 14-80[,]” which clearly doe s apply to Plaintiffs. Id. § 204.3(I). Finally, even if an

28

- 29 -

1 argument could be made that Section 204.3 is relevant to this case, the argument may have

2 been waived because Plaintiffs did not allege this argument in their Complaint.

3

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment

4 (Doc. 179) is DENIED.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDEREDthat Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc.

6 181) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

7

1. Regarding joint em ployment, the Court holds that Marlin Growers, Marlin

8 Ranching, SAMI, and Richard De Leon are joint employers, but denies summary judgment

9 regarding the employer status of the remaining Defendants.

10

2. Regarding the FLSA, to the extent Plaintiffs can prove at trial that they spent

11 time waiting in the fields and traveling from one field to another, that time is compensable.

12 With respect to waiting tim e at the corralon and tra vel time between the corralon and the

13 fields, summary judgment is denied.

14

3. Regarding AWPA, to the extent Plaintiffs can prove at trial that Defendants

15 were required to pay wages under the FLSAor California wage laws, liability under AWPA

16 is established. The Court denies summary judgment in all other respects.

17

4. Regarding California wage laws, to the extent Plaintiffs can prove at trial that

18 they performed compensable wait and/or travel time in California, this constitutes a violation

19 of California wage laws. And to the extent Plaintiffs can prove that Defendants willfully

20 committed these violations, statutory penalties under Cal. Lab. Code. § 203 are appropriate.

21 Summary judgment is denied in all other respects.

22

DATED this 20th day of September, 2010.

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 30 -

 
 Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 1 of 12

1 Pamela Bridge, Bar No. 018252 pbridge@clsaz.org
2 George McKay, Bar No. 015910 gmckay@clsaz.org
3 COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES 305 S. Second Avenue
4 P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, Arizona 85036-1538
5 (602) 258-3434, ext. 2650 Facsimile: (602) 258-4628
6 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
7

8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
10

11 Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez

)

de Meza, Marcos Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, )

12 Pedro Angulo, Harold Appling, Cesar Arce

)

Insunza, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo

)

13 Arroyo Camacho, Santiago Arzate Carrillo,

)

Armando Arzate-Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos

)

14 Barron, Raul Avila Almanza, Baldemar

) CV07-02581 PHX-GMS

Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran Miranda,

)

15 Juan Beltran Soto, Rafael Beltran-Nunez,

)

Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello-Avila, )

16 Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, ) FIFTH AMENDED

Marco Antonio Cabrera-Garcia, Octavio

) COMPLAINT FOR

17 Caldera, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino

) DECLARATORY AND

Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz,

) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF

18 Jose Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, ) AND DAMAGES

Amador Cervantes-Sandoval, Jesus Cervantes- )

19 Sandoval,Rosario Chinchillas, Jose Contreras )

Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez,

)

20 Baldomero Corona Ruiz, Cipriano Crispin

)

Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Peregrino

)

21 De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias,

)

Diego Delgado Torres, Alejandro Duarte,

)

22 Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte

)

Rascon, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe )

23 Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, )

Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix Prado,

)

24 Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez )

Zamudio, Raul Garcia, Jesus Gaxiola,

)

25 Jose Gaxiola, Rosa Gaxiola, Mauro German )

Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez,

)

26 Genoveva Gonzalez, Gloria Gonzalez,

)

Maria Gonzalez, Saul Gonzalez de Leon,

)

27 Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Reynaldo

)

Guerra Jimenez, Lorenzo Hernandez,

)

28 Tomas Hernandez, Mario Hernandez

)

Hernandez, Sabas Hernandez Muniz,

)

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 2 of 12

1 Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Ernesto Herrera )

Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco

)

2 Ledesma, Francisco Leon Torres, Fernando

)

Linares Sanchez, Luis Llamas Leon, Martin )

3 Arturo Lopez, Lino Lopez Figueroa, Casimiro )

Lopez Medina, Teodoro Loya Carrillo,

)

4 Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus Luque, Rito Luque )

Luque, Abelino Macias Nunez, Sergio Magana )

5 Villicana , Isidro Martinez, Trinidad Medina, )

Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina )

6 Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto,

)

Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa

)

7 Sedano, Orne Meza Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, )

Maria Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros,

)

8 Jesus Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda

)

Lopez, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda,

)

9 Luis Montanez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado,

)

Ramon Moreno-Gutierrez, Jesus Navarrete

)

10 Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, )

Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, )

11 Felix Nunez Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, )

Marco Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios,

)

12 Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra,

)

Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri,

)

13 Armando Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, )

Modeso Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez,

)

14 Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Juan Ramirez Garcia,)

Antonio Ramirez Soto, Jose Luis Ramos,

)

15 Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza,

)

Javier Rendon Aguilera, Graciela Reyes Medina, )

16 Miguel Rodriguez Ramirez, Ramon Rodriguez )

Rubio, Juan Rodriguez-Orozco, Florencio Rojo )

17 Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo )

Torres, Jaime Ruano-Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, )

18 Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan )

Sanchez Huerta, Miguel Sanchez Huerta,

)

19 Jose Sanchez Salas, Maria Sandoval

)

Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario Santos,

)

20 Uriel Santos, Jose Segura Sandoval, Jose Maria )

Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia )

21 Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres )

Corona, Hermelinda Torres Herrera,

)

22 Jorge Trejo Gonzalez, Jose Valdez Acosta,

)

Luis Valdez Duran, Victor Valenzuela,

)

23 Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino

)

Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose

)

24 Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique )

Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez,

)

25 Juan Villa Parra, Victor Villanueva,

)

Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora

)

26 Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente )

Zamudio Trujillo, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, )

27 Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Luis Trejo-Lopez,

)

Pedro Lubiano Cisneros,

)

28

)

-2-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 3 of 12

1

)

Plaintiffs,

)

2

)

vs.

)

3

)

Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc.,

)

4 Richard De Leon, and Marlin Ranching

)

Company, Marlin Growers Inc.,

)

5

)

Defendants.

)

6

)

)

7

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

8

1. To protect the wa ges and working conditions of the dom estic agricultural

9

workforce, federal law requires em ployers to exercise a preference for U.S . farmworkers

10

before turning to foreign farm labor. In 2006, in violation of these and other federal labor

11

protections, Defendants displaced its entire U.S. citizen and legal perm anent resident

12

workforce with foreign nationals brought in as H-2A guest workers.

13

2. Plaintiffs, displaced U.S. farm workers em ployed by Defendants in the

14

2005-2006 and previous citrus harvesting seasons, bring claims for violations of the Migrant

15

and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (“AWPA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 1802 et seq.,

16

including Defendants’ breach of the parties’ working arrangement and provision of false and

17

misleading information concerning the terms and conditions of employment.

18

3. Further, U.S. citizen Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel

19

Angel Rapan, Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia, Jose M. Se gura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano,

20

Gustavo Zerega Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa bring claims under 42 U.S.C. §1981

21

for discrimination in hiring based on alienage.

22

JURISDICTION

23

4. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331, since

24

the action arises under the laws of the United States; 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a)(4), covering claims

25

arising under federal civil rights statutes; and 29 U.S.C. § 1854, covering claismarising under

26

the AWPA.

27

5. Venue is proper in this Court based on 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b) since a substantial

28

part of the relevant events and omissions occurred in the district of Arizona.

-3-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 4 of 12

1

PARTIES

2

6. Plaintiffs Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez de Meza, Marcos

3 Amezcua, Sergio Am ezcua, Pedro Angulo, Harold Appling, Cesar Arce Insunza, Jose

4 Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Ar royo Cam acho, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Arm ando

5 Arzate-Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Raul Avila Alm anza, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla,

6 David Beltran Miranda, Juan Beltran Soto, Rafael Beltran-Nunez, Jacobo Bobadilla German,

7 Jose Botello-Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marco Antonio

8 Cabrera-Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido

9 Castro Ruiz, Jose Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Cervantes-Sandoval,

10 Jesus Cervantes-Sandoval, Rosario Chinchillas, Jose Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova

11 Martinez, Baldomero Corona Ruiz, Cipriano Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar,

12 Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado Torres, Alejandro

13 Duarte, Fernando DuarteOchoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe

14 Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix Prado, Lucia

15 Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Garcia, Jesus Gaxiola, Jose

16 Gaxiola, Rosa Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva

17 Gonzalez, Gloria Gonzalez, Maria Gonzalez, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez

18 Espinoza, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Mario

19 Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Ernesto Herrera

20 Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon Torres, Fernando Linares

21 Sanchez, Luis Llamas Leon, Martin Arturo Lopez, Lino Lopez Figueroa, Casimiro Lopez

22 Medina, Teodoro Loya Carrillo, Ruben Luna Ra mirez, Jesus Luque, Rito Luque Luque,

23 Abelino Macias Nunez, Sergio Magana Villicana, Isidro Martinez, Trinidad Medina, Rey

24 David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza

25 Madrid, Hilario Mesa Sedano, Orne Meza Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria Miranda,

26 Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda Lopez, Austroheberto

27 Miranda Miranda, Luis Montanez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno-Gutierrez, Jesus

28 Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio

-4-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 5 of 12

1 Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Marco Pacheco Valdez,

2 Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus

3 Penunuri, Armando Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modeso Plasencia, Facundo

4 Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Juan Ramirez Garcia, Antonio Ramirez Soto, JoseLuis

5 Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Graciela Reyes

6 Medina, Miguel Rodriguez Ram irez, Ram on Rodriguez Rubio, Juan, Rodriguez-Orozco,

7 Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano-Lomeli,

8 Antonio Rubio, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Miguel

9 Sanchez Huerta, Jose Sanchez Salas, Maria Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario

10 Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose Segura Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo

11 Tapia Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda Torres Herrera, Jorge

12 Trejo Gonzalez, Jose Valdez Acosta, Luis Valdez Duran, Victor Valenzuela, Guadalupe Valle

13 Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega

14 Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Juan Villa Parra, Victor Villanueva, Jose

15 Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zam ora Aguilera, Manuel Zam ora Sanchez, Vicente Zam udio

16 Trujillo, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Luis Trejo-Lopez, and Pedro

17 Lubiano Cisneros are United States legal permanent residents and farmworkers who have their

18 permanent place of residence in and around Yuma County, Arizona.

19

7. Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan,

20 Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia, Jose M. Segura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gustavo Zerega

21 Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa are United States citizens and farmworkers who have

22 their permanent place of residence in and around Yuma County, Arizona.

23

8. Upon information and belief, Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex. Inc.

24 (“SAMI”) does business in Arizona and is registered in Arizona as a corporation.

25

9. Defendant Richard De Leon is his son, is an owner and president of Defendant

26 Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., and was operations manager of Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos.

27

10. Upon informa tion and belief, Defendant Marlin Ranching Com

pany

28 (hereinafter “Marlin Ranching”) and Marlin Growers Inc. does business in Arizona and are

-5-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 6 of 12

1 registered as corporations in Arizona.

2

11. Defendants are being sued as employers of Plaintiffs at all times relevant to this

3 case.

4

STATEMENT OF FACTS

5

12. During the 2005-2006 citrus season and froseveral seasons before, Defendants

6 employed Plaintiffs to work in citrus harvests.

7

13. At all times relevant to this action, Palintiffs were seasonal agricultural workers

8 within the meaning of the AWPA, at 29 U.S.C. § 1802(10), and/or individuals entitled to the

9 AWPA’s protections.

10

14. At all times relevant to this action, Defendants were “agricultural employers”

11 within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1802(2).

12

15. Prior to the harvest seasons 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, in August

13 each year, Defendants recruited Plaintiffs to performagricultural labor in and around aSn Luis,

14 Arizona.

15

16. Plaintiffs expected to be rehired every season by Defendants.

16

17. During the harvest seasons 2003-2004, 2004-2005 and 2005-2006, it was

17 Defendants’ practice to either contact Plaintiffs by letter or telephone or recruit them in

18 parking lots in San Luis, Arizona and inform them about the start date of the harvest season.

19

18. In 2006, rather than rehiring Plaintiffs, SAMI sought perm ission to im port

20 foreign H-2A workers, premised on certifications that it could not find qualified U.S. workers

21 for the citrus harvest. On June 29, 2006, the Department of Labor (DOL) approved SAM’s

22 application, attached as Exhibit 1 (hereinafter “SAMI order”).

23

19. The SAMI order was also filed with the Arizona Departm ent of Econom ic

24 Security Office in Phoenix, Arizona.

25

20. The SAMI order was an offer of employment to 150 workers to be employed

26 as fruit harvest workers from August 15, 2006 through March 31, 2007.

27

21. The SAMI or der constituted an offer of em ployment to Plaintiffs and a

28 “working arrangement” between Defendants and Plaintiffs.

-6-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 7 of 12

1

22. The SAMI order was utilized by Defendants as a written disclosure of the

2 terms and conditions of employment.

3

23. The SAMI order stated that Defendants would provide housing in Dateland,

4 Arizona and promised $8.00 per hour and 30 hours of work per week.

5

24. In the job order, SAMI offered hours and wages inferior to those offered and

6 paid to Plaintiffs in previous seasons, when SAM was not importing foreign farm labor.

7

25. Upon information and belief, the prevailing wages and working hours of citrus

8 harvesters in the San Luis, Arizona area in 2006-2007 exceeded $240.00 and 30 hours of

9 work per week.

10

26. Upon information and belief, Defendants knew that the wages a nd working

11 hours of citrus harvesters in San Luis, Arizona area in 2006-2007 exceeded $240.00 per week

12 and 30 hours of work per week.

13

27. Upon information and belief, Defendants intentionally set the promised wages

14 and working hours below prevailing m arket conditions in an effor t to m ake the jobs

15 undesirable to U.S. workers.

16

28. Attached to the SAMI order was a letter from Defendant Marlin, the citrus

17 grower, stating that it intended to contract with “SAMEX” for lemon and orange harvesters

18 from August 15, 2006 through Marc h 31, 2007. Marlin’s letter stated that it needed 150

19 workers.

20

29. Also attached to the order was a docum ent stating that Defendant Servicios

21 Agricolas Mex. Inc. carried workers compensation and employers liability insurance policy

22 from August 1, 2005- August 1, 2006.

23

30. Also attached to the SAMI order were assurances by Defendants that they

24 would “positively recruit” U.S. workers.

25

31. Despite these assurances, before the 2006-2007 harvest season, none of the

26 Plaintiffs was recruited by Defendants.

27

32. Before the 2006-2007 harvest season, none of the Plaintiffs received letters or

28 telephone calls from Defendants informing them of the start date of the season.

-7-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 8 of 12

1

33. Before the 2006-2007 harvest season, Defendants failed to recruit at the

2 parking lots in San Luis, Arizona, the prevaili ng practice in the area and Defendants’ past

3 practice.

4

34. Before the 2006-2007 harvest season and at the beginning of the season,

5 several Plaintiffs asked agents of Defendants when the season would begin, and they were told

6 that they were being replaced by “Mexican contract workers.”

7

35. None of the Plaintiffs was hired by Defendants for the 2006-2007 lem on

8 season.

9

36. Instead, Defendants filled all 150 harvesting positions with f oreign H-2A

10 workers.

11

37. All of the H-2A workers hired by Defendnats were foreign nationals. None was

12 a citizen or resident of the United States.

13

38. As of a result of Defenda nts’ failure to recruit and hire Plaintiffs, Plaintiffs

14 suffered damages.

15

39. While previously employed by Defendants, Plaintiffs harvested crops that were

16 produced for movement in interstate commerce, or for incorporation as ingredients in products

17 anticipated to move in interstate commerce.

18

40. All of the actions and omissions alleged in this Complaint were undertaken by

19 Defendants either directly or through their agents.

20

41. As a result of Defendants’ unlawful discrimination against Plaintiffs Harold

21 Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia, Jose M.

22 Segura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gustavo Ze rega Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa,

23 they suffered damages which include back pay as well as for mental anguish and humiliation.

24

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

25 (Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act, 29 U.S.C. § 1801 et seq.)

26

42. Plaintiffs allege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 to 41.

27

43. The SAMI order constituted a “working arrangem ent” as defined under the

28 AWPA, between Plaintiffs and Defendants.

-8-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 9 of 12

1

44. The SAMI order was utilized by Defendants to satisfy the written disclosures

2 provision of the AWPA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1821(a) and 1831(a).

3

45. Defendants knowingly provided false and misleading information to the DOL

4 and Plaintiffs concerning the terms, conditions and existence of employment by Defendants

5 in contravention of the AWPA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1821(f) and 1831(e), by:

6

a. informing many Plaintiffs that jobs were not available;

7

b. failing to recruit Plaintiffs by te lephone, m ail or in parking lots as

8

practiced in previous seasons;

9

c. including assurances set forth in the SAMI order to positively recruit

10

while intending to not comply with such assurances;

11

d. falsifying the amount of hours per week of employment while knowing

12

that the hours would be greater.

13

46. Defendants’ failure to recruit and porvide employment to Plaintiffs was without

14 justification and violated the term s of Defendants' working arrangem ent with P laintiffs, in

15 contravention of the AWPA, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1822 (c) and 1832 (c).

16

47. The violations of the AWPA described herein were the result of the conscious

17 and deliberate actions of Defendants and wereintentional within the meaning of the AWPA,

18 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (1982).

19

48. For each violation of the AWPA, each Plaintiff so affected is entitled to receive

20 the greater of his actual damages or up to $500.00per violation in statutory damages pursuant

21 to 29 U.S.C. § 1854 (c).

22

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION

23

(Discrimination Based Upon Alienage, 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et seq )

24

(On Behalf of Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel

25 Rapan, Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia, Jose M. Segura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano,

26

Gustavo Zerega Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa)

27

49. Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan,

28 Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia, Jose M. Segura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gustavo Zerega

-9-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 10 of 12

1 Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa allege and incorporate by reference paragraphs 1 to 48.

2

50. Defendants intentionally discrim inated against Plaintiffs Harold Appling,

3 Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia, Jose M. Segura

4 Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gusta vo Zerega Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa in the

5 making of an employment contract, by refusing to recruit or re-hire them as harvest workers

6 based upon their alienage, in favor of non-resident, Mexican nationals.

7

51. Defendants intentionally and knowingly attempted to dissuade U.S. workers

8 including Plaintiffs Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, Maria

9 Miranda, Raul Garcia, Jose M. Segura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza

10 and Fernando Duarte Ochoa from em ployment with Defendants by offering sub-m arket

11 weekly wages and hours, in order to create a pretext for alienage discrimination.

12

52. As a result of Defendants’ violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981 et. seq., Plaintiffs

13 Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia,

14 Jose M. Segura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza and Fernando Duarte

15 Ochoa are entitled to damages which include back pay, compensatory damages, declaratory

16 and injunctive relief, punitive damages, and attorneys’ fees and costs.

17

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

18

Wherefore, Plaintiffs pray that this Court grant them the following relief:

19

a. Declare that Defendants intentionally violated Plaintiffs’ rights under the

20

AWPA;

21

b. Award each Plaintiff the greater of his or her actual daamges, or statutory

22

damages of $500 for each violation of the AWPA in each season

23

applicable;

24

c. Enjoin Defendants from future violations of the AWPA by fa iling to

25

recruit and hire U.S. farmworkers;

26

d. Declare that Defendants discriminated against Plaintiffs Harold Appling,

27

Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, Maria Mira nda, Raul

28

Garcia, Jose M. Se gura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gustavo Zerega

-10-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 11 of 12

1

Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa based upon their alienage pursuant

2

to 42 U.S.C. §1981;

3

e. For Defendants’ violations of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, award Plaintiffs Harold

4

Appling, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, Maria Miranda,

5

Raul Garcia, Jose M. Segura Sandoval, Octavio Serrano, Gustavo Zerega

6

Espinoza and Fernando Duarte Ochoa their backpay and compensatory

7

damages including com pensation for their m ental anguish and

8

humiliation, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees and costs, as set forth

9

below;

10

f. Enjoin Defendants from future hiring discrim ination in violation of 42

11

U.S.C. § 1981, by favoring foreign nationals over U.S. citizens;

12

g. Award Plaintiffs pre- and post judgment interest; their costs of suit; and

13

for Community Legal Services, their reasonable attorney’s fees; and

14

h. Award Plaintiffs such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.

15

RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 12th day of August, 2011.

16

COMMUNITY LEGAL SERVICES

17

18

/s/Pamela M. Bridge

Pamela M. Bridge

19

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

-11-

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 59-3 Filed 08/12/11 Page 12 of 12
1 I hereby certify that I electronically transmitted the attached document to the Clerk’s Office using the CM/ECF system for filing and transm ittal of a Notice of Electronic Filing to the
2 following CM/ECF registrants, this 12th day of August, 2011. 3
Tom Crowe, Esq. 4 tom@crowescott.com
CROWE & SCOTT, P.A. 5 1100 East Washington Street
Suite 200 6 Phoenix, Arizona 85034-1090 7 Attorney for Defendants 8 9 /s/Laura E. Smith
Laura E. Smith 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
-12-

 
 Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 32

1 WO

2

3

4

5

6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8

9 Frederico Aguilar Murillo, et al.,

10

Plaintiffs,

11 vs.

12 Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., et al.,
13 Defendants.
14

15

) No. CV-07-2581-PHX-GMS ) ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND ) CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

16

Pursuant to the agreement of the parties, the Court held a non-jury trial on Plaintiffs’

17 complaint on August 23-25, 30-31 and Septem ber 1-2, 2011. The parties filed post-trial

18 memoranda on Septem ber 9, 2011. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52, the

19 Court hereby makes its findings of fact and conclusions of law.1

20

FINDINGS OF FACT

21

1. Plaintiffs are 171 United States workers com posed of nine United States

22 Citizens and 162 perm anent legal residents of the United States. Although they are legal

23 permanent residents of the United States, most of them reside in or around the area of San

24 Luis, Mexico and/or San Luis, Arizona. Plaintiffs are harvest workers who worked for

25 Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc. (“SAMI”) during either the 2004-05 or 2005-06

26

27

1On March 6, 2012 this Court received notice that Defendant Richard De Leon filed

for bankruptcy. The claims against him, therefore, are stayed pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362. 28

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 2 of 32

1 harvest seasons. There is a great disparity among them in terms of the amount of time that

2 they actually worked for SAMI during either or both of these seasons.

3

2. Plaintiffs bring claims against Defendants for failing to employ them, or extend

4 them offers of em ployment, during the 2006-07 citrus harvesting season that occurred in

5 southwest and central Arizona. Plaintiffs claimthat such failures violated provisions of the

6 Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (“AWPA”) 29 U.S.C. § 1800 et

7 seq (2009).

8

3. In addition, the nine U.S. citizen Plaintiffs—Harold Appling, Arturo Salgado

9 Bahena, Miguel Angel Rapan, Maria Miranda, Raul Garcia, Fenando Duarte Ochoa, Jose M.

10 Segura Sandova l, Oc tavio Serrano and Gustavo Zerega Espinoza—bring § 1981 claim s

11 against the Defendants alleging that Defendants failed to hire them because they are U.S.

12 Citizens.

13

4. The Claims in the operative complaint are limited to the 2006-07 season.

14

5. Defendant SAMI is a farm labor contractor. It is an Arizona corporation,

15 incorporated in 2004. It is engaged in the business of providing farmharvesting services to

16 agricultural producers, including citrus growers, in Arizona.

17

6. Defendant Marlin Ranching Com pany (“Marlin Ranching”) is an Arizona

18 corporation incorporated in 1993. It farms citrus and owns or leases land on which Plaintiffs

19 picked lemons while they were employed with Defendants.

20

7. Defendant Marlin Growers Inc. (“Marlin Growers”) is an Arizona corporation

21 and non-profit agricultural cooperative incorporated in 1988 having as its members persons

22 or entities who grow citrus.

23

8. A citrus harvest season in Arizona extends fromapproximately late August or

24 early September of one year to late Fe bruary or early March of the following year, with

25 pruning and related practices occurring thereafter.

26

9. After the discontinuation of the bracero program in the late 1960s, distinct

27 patterns began to emerge for hiring agricultural workers in central and western Arizona for

28 harvesting the annual citrus crop.

- 2 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 3 of 32

1

10. Yuma County, in western Arizona, adjusted to the loss of the bracero program

2 by becom ing m ostly able, over tim e, to pr ovide sufficient dom estic workers for citrus

3 harvesting in the Yuma Valley area. Such seasonal agricultural workers are either United

4 States citizens or permanent legal residents who live in or around San Luis, Mexico or San

5 Luis, Arizona.

6

11. Companies and farmlabor contractors that wish to recruit seasonal agricultural

7 workers in San Luis generally do so at the corralons located there. Corralons are garages in

8 San Luis with associated parking lots in which farm labor contractors recruit workers and

9 store their buses. The buses are used for the daily transportation of the farmlaborers to the

10 fields they will be harvesting during harvest season.

11

12. Each farm labor contractor’s corralon is generally located in the same area of

12 San Luis. For a few days prior to the date on which the citrus harvest begins, those

13 companies renting corralon space will park their buses outside of their respective corralon.

14 The parking of the buses outside the corralon isa signal to the residents of the area that the

15 harvesting season is about to begin. The various contractors’ foremen will generally be at

16 the corralon or at the border attempting to recruit harvest workers at this time.

17

13. While a number of workers will return to work for the same foreman and the

18 same farm labor contractor during successive harvest seasons, there is considerable turnover

19 in the workers that make up a foreman’s crew both during the same harvest season, and from

20 year to year.

21

14. During the course of the same harvest season workers on a crew may choose

22 to work more or fewer days, change the foreman for whom they work, or change companies.

23 A foreman may decide to change the farmlabor contractor for whom he and his crew work.

24 Because both workers and foremen are paid bonuses based on productivity, there is a desire

25 to work for a good company and a good foreman in fields that will be productive.

26

15. Those workers wanting to work in the harvest that have not already agreed to

27 work for a particular foreman or who wish to change the crew for which they work, report

28 to the corralons and sign up to work for a foreman, or make other arrangements separately

- 3 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 4 of 32

1 with a foreman. New workers are employed at the corralon throughout the duration of the

2 harvest season.

3

16. Workers are recruited at the corralons in San Luis to harvest fields in the Yuam

4 Valley area, including Bard, California. They are typically transported by their em ployer

5 from the corralon in San Luis to the harvest fields in Yuma Valley and back aga in to San

6 Luis.

7

17. Although a number of seasonal agricultural workers hired them selves out to

8 work in Yum a Valley from the corralons at San Luis, there were historical shortages of

9 adequate U.S. farm workers to accom plish the citrus harvest in the m ore central parts of

10 Arizona including White Wing, which is close to Dateland, Arizona, and in Maricopa and

11 Pinal counties. These locations are a lengthy commute from San Luis. A one-way commute

12 by bus between San Luis and White Wing, the closest location, takes between two to three

13 hours.

14

18. Prior to the 2006-07 harvest season, citrus growers in Maricopa and Pinal

15 counties had relied on the H-2A program2 to recruit authorized Mexican workers to obtain

16 sufficient workers to harvest their annual citrus crop when they could not otherwise obtain

17 sufficient U.S. workers.

18

19. The H-2A program regulates the importation of non-resident temporary alien

19 agricultural workers. The program regulations are designed to protect the employment and

20 working conditions of citizens or perm anent lega l residents of the United States while

21 enabling em ployers to hire foreign workers when sufficient dom estic em ployees are

22 unavailable.

23

20. The Marlin entities had fields to harvest in the Yuma Valley, at White Wing

24 and in Maricopa and Pinal counties.

25

21. Prior to the 2002-03 harvest season, William Chaney, the President of the

26

27

2Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 § 101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a), codified at 8 U.S.C.

28 § 1101(a)(15)(H)(ii)(a).

- 4 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 5 of 32

1 Marlin entities, called Ralph De Leon and determined that he and his com pany Servicios

2 Agricola Mexicano (“SAMCO”) would be interested in providing fa rm labor contracting

3 services in Arizona for the Marlin entities.

4

22. SAMCO is no longer a Defendant in this action.

5

23. At the tim e, Ralph De Leon’s son Richard was a m anagement employee at

6 SAMCO, but he was principally involved in SAMCO’s California operations.

7

24. In the 2002-03 harvest season the Marlin entities epmloyed SAMCO to harvest

8 their citrus crop. SAMCO recruited workers at the corralon in San Luis to work the Yuma

9 Valley fields. It is not apparent to the Court based upon the evidence provided whether

10 SAMCO obtained authorization to use H-2A workers to harvest the groves in central Arizona

11 during the 02-03 season.

12

25. In 2003-04, the Marlin entities again contracted with SAMCO for purposes of

13 obtaining their farm labor. Prior to the beginning of this harvest season, SAMCO made an

14 application to the United States Department of Labor for approval to bring in 200 Mexican

15 H-2A workers to harvest Marlin’s fields at 98500 Palomas Rd. in Dateland, Arizona (White

16 Wing).

17

26. The H-2A application was filled out and presented to the Department of Labor

18 by William Marrs—SAMCO’s attorney.

19

27. Although SAMCO requested 200 H-2A workers, the Departm ent through

20 Arizona’s designated workforce agency determined that the barracks at White Wing only had

21 sufficient space to house 150 alien workers. Thus, on August 6, 2003, SAMCO’s application

22 was approved but for only 150 H-2A workers. The approval was subject to SAMCO’s

23 assurances made in the application process.

24

28. In 2004, Ralph De Leon’s wife became seriously ill requiring much more of

25 his attention. As a result, his son Richard becam e more involved in SAMCO’s Arizona

26 operations.

27

29. Subsequently, after discussions with his father, Richard formed his own farm

28 labor contracting company—SAMI.

- 5 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 6 of 32

1

30. During the 2004-05 season the Marlin companies contracted with both SAMI

2 and SAMCO to accomplish their citrus harvesting. SAMI took over SAMCO’s operations

3 with respect to the citrus harvesting in Yuma Valley and in Bard, California and the related

4 transportation of workers to the orchards fromthe corralon at San Luis. SAMCO continued

5 to harvest the orchards in central Arizona using the authorized H-2A workers that it housed

6 at Marlin’s barracks at White Wing.

7

31. Because SAMI was, in effect, replacing SAMCO in its operations in thYeuma

8 Valley, Richard De Leon and other SAMI management employees held a breakfast meeting

9 at the San Luis McDona lds, prior to the com mencement of the 04-05 season, with the

10 foremen that had previously worked for SAMCO in the Yuma Valley area. The meeting was

11 to inform them of the season’s approximate start date and to determine whether the foremen

12 who had worked for SAMCO the previous harvest season would be returning with their

13 crews to work for SAMI.

14

32. Oscar Agauyo Sr. a nd Oscar Agauyo Jr., who had been supervisors for

15 SAMCO, came to work as supervisors for SAMI. Jose Castano, who had been a foreamn for

16 SAMCO in the 03-04 season, became a supervisor for SAMI in the 04-05, and 05-06 harvest

17 seasons. He reported to Oscar Agauyo Sr.

18

33. Leobardo Aguirre, Jose Gonzales, Humberto Gaxiola, and Julio Cesar De La

19 Rocha had also worked for SAMCO, and its predecessor C&F, and becam e foremen for

20 SAMI in 04-05. These foreman either recruited their past workers, or, to the extent it was

21 necessary or desirable, recruited new workers at the corralon at San Luis for SAMI.

22

34. SAMI management understood that it was after this McDonald’s meeting or

23 other initial contact with the foremen that the forem en began re-assem bling their form er

24 crews and recruiting new crew members for the ensuing harvesting season.

25

35. Prior to the beginning of the 04-05 harvest season, the Departm ent of

26 Economic Security sent out notices to th e Yum a Valley workers who ha d worked for

27 SAMCO during the 03-04 harvest season who were receiving unemployment benefits. The

28 notices inform ed them of the date on which the 04-05 harvest season would begin and

- 6 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 7 of 32

1 directed them to report for work if they desirdeto remain eligible for unemployment benefits.

2 Richard De Leon acknowledges that SAMI would have benefitted from this notice to

3 previous S AMCO workers by obtaining a greater num ber of workers from S an Luis to

4 harvest in Yuma Valley.

5

36. Because SAMCO, not SAMI, kept that part of the Marlin harvesting that used

6 H-2A employees, SAMCO again requested the Department of Labor to certify 150 H-2A

7 workers to reside at White Wing, and Buckeye to harvest Marlin’s orchards in c entral

8 Arizona. This 04-05 harvest season SAMCO’s application indicated that the workers were

9 to harvest 640 acres in Dateland (White Wing), 800 acres in Eloy, 80 acres in Maricopa, 320

10 acres in Surprise, and 12 acres in Phoenix. SAMCO proposed to provide housing at its

11 barracks locations both in White Wing and in Buckeye.

12

37. Again, the application was filled out and presented to the Departemnt of Labor

13 by William Marrs—SAMCO’s attorney.

14

38. SAMCO also sent to the Department two formletters that it had sent to the two

15 U.S. employees who worked the previous year at White Wing informing those two workers

16 that the sam e em ployment at White Wing would be available and to call if they were

17 interested in such work. Similarly SAMCO sent proof that it ran radio ads recruiting U.S.

18 workers and further provided two newspa per solicitations that it had taken out in a local

19 newspaper soliciting 150 citrus workers to work at White Wing.

20

39. SAMCO’s application for 150 H-2A workers was approved and those workers

21 harvested Marlin’s central Arizona orchards in 04-05. The approval was again subject to the

22 fulfillment of the assurances made by SAMCO in the application process.

23

40. During the 05-06 season, the Marlin com panies again contracted with both

24 SAMI and SAMCO. SAMI and SAMCO continued to split the work as described above.

25 Thus, during the 05-06 season, SAMI again conducted that part of Marlin’s harvest that

26 transported workers from the corralon at San Luis to harvest fields principally in the Yuma

27 Valley.

28

41. Again, Richard De Leon and other m anagement employees held a breakfast

- 7 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 8 of 32

1 meeting at the S an Luis McDonalds just prior to the harvest, to determ ine whether the

2 foremen who had worked for SAMI the previous harvest season would be returning to work

3 for SAMI. Aguirre, Castano, De La Rocha, Gaxiola, and Gonzalez all returned to work for

4 SAMI in the 05-06 season.

5

42. Because during the 05-06 harvesting season SAMCO again kept that part of

6 the Marlin harvesting that used H-2A employees, SAMCO sought and received certification

7 for approximately 100 H-2A workers to harvest specified acreage throughout the state prior

8 to the beginning of the harvest. That year, however, in addition to seeking H-2A workers to

9 harvest 640 acres of citrus groves a t W hite Wing, 800 acres in Eloy, and 80 acres in

10 Maricopa, SAMCO sought approval to use H-2A workers to harvest 300 acres in the Yuma

11 Valley. Those 300 acres were specifically identified as being at County Road 14 and 6E and

12 County Road 13 and 6E. SAMCO only proposed to house the worke rs at the barracks in

13 White Wing.

14

43. Again, the application was filled out and presented to the Departemnt of Labor

15 by William Marrs—SAMCO’s attorney.

16

44. SAMCO sent to the Departm ent proof that it ran ra dio ads recruiting U.S.

17 workers and further provided two newspaper solicitations that it had taken out in Spanish in

18 a local newspaper soliciting citrus workers to work at White Wing. It does not appear from

19 the exhibits submitted that any U.S. workers had worked for SAMCO the previous year at

20 White Wing.

21

45. SAMCO’s application for 100 H-2A workers was approved. The application

22 specifically approved workers to harvest not only in Dateland, Eloy and Maricopa but also

23 in Yuma, Arizona. The approval was again subject to SAMCO’s a ssurances made in the

24 application process.

25

46. Marlin had between 1000-1600 acres in citrus groves in the Yuma Valley in

26 the 05-06 harvest season. Evidence offered suggests that after that season, Marlin began to

27 sell its property in the Yuma Valley area due to the housing boom and the age of the citrus

28 groves.

- 8 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 9 of 32

1

47. Ralph De Leon decided to retire in 2006 and to te rminate the operations of

2 SAMCO. Upon being inf ormed of Ralph’s decision, William Chaney, the director of the

3 Marlin entities, asked SAMI and Richard De Leon if it wanted to pick up the central Arizona

4 harvesting operations previously performed by SAMCO and his father. SAMI determined

5 that it would do so.

6

48. For the 06-07 harvest season SAMI was paid on a cost-plus basis by Marlin.

7 Marlin payed SAMI its labor cost plus an overhead of 42.5%.

8

49. On June 19, 2006, SAMI filed its application for temporary labor certification

9 with the U.S. Department of Labor for 150 H-2A workers to be employed as fruit harvest

10 workers from August 15, 2006 through March 31, 2007. The application was filled out by

11 the same attorney, William Marrs, that had previously represented SAMCO and wa s now

12 representing SAMI. The workers were again to be housed in the barracks at White Wing.

13 The application described the need for H-2A workers to work the same number of acres and

14 in the sam e locations, inc luding the sam e 300 acres in Yum a, as had previously been

15 requested and approved for S AMCO in the 05-06 harvest season. SAMI m ade the sam e

16 assurances as did SAMCO and followed the same procedures dictated by the Department of

17 Labor and the Arizona Department of Economic Security in submitting its application.

18

50. The designated certifying officer withrespect to SAMI’s 06-07 application wsa

19 Marie C. Gonzalez. On June 27, 2006, the U.S. Department of Labor, through Ms. Gonzalez,

20 determined that SAMI’s application contained conditions of em ployment that “will not

21 adversely affect U.S. worker’s sim ilarly em ployed.” Ms. Gonzalez directed SAMI to

22 continue to cooperate with Arizona Workforce Connections to recruit workers, take

23 interviews, and document the interviews. In addition to running the specified newspaper

24 advertisements containing specific details of the job offer, Ms. Gonzalez required SAMI to

25 also run at least one radio ad containing the details of the offer. Further in term

s of

26 complying with the assurance that SAMI would contact “qualified workers in other areas of

27 the State and/or nation by letter and/or by telephone,” Ms. Gonzalez directed SAMI to

28 “contact former U.S. employees, and solicit their return to the job. All actions and responses

- 9 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 10 of 32

1 should be documented.”

2

51. Defendants in certain respects exceeded the requirem ents of Ms. Gonzales.

3 They ran Spanish and English advertisements on a local radio station and in local Yuma area

4 newspapers seeking to recruit workers to work fromtheir White Wing facility. Despite the

5 requirement that they run a single radio ad, th ey ran two. Furthe r, the state job service

6 solicited workers for the j ob opportunities at White Wing and set up job interviews with

7 SAMI for potential em ployees on pre -set dates. Although potential U.S. candidates set

8 appointments for job interviews with SAMI, only one of the job candidates presented hsiemlf

9 for the interview, and no U.S. candidates were hired to work at White Wing for the 06-07

10 harvest season.

11

52. SAMI did not m ail any le tters of recruitm ent to form er U.S. em ployees

12 advertising the positions. SAMI had not previously housed workers at White Wing and thus

13 had not previously hired former U.S. migratory agricultural employees who had worked from

14 White Wing. An inadequate response was received fromthe advertisements and the state job

15 service agency recruitment to fill the positions needed by SAMI.

16

53. On July 14, 2006 Ms. Gonzalez granted SAMI the certification to employ 150

17 H-2A workers at White Wing. That certification specifically authorized work in the Yuma

18 fields specified in the application. I t, too, was granted “subject to the conditions and

19 assurances made during the application process.”

20

54. The base of Defendant SAMI’s harvest operation during the 06-07 ha rvest

21 season was switched to White Wing, Arizona, a location at least 90 miles to the east of San

22 Luis. Single residential barracks at White Wing were used to house and feed workers. The

23 vast majority of these workers, if not all of them, were H-2A workers approved and certified

24 by the Department of Labor. When groves other than White Wing were to be harvested,

25 SAMI transported its harvest workers to those groves including groves at Eloy, Maricopa,

26 and in the Yuma Valley. At the end of the day the workers were transported fromthe groves

27 back to White Wing by SAMI.

28

55. SAMI conducted no operations in the 06-07 harvest season fromthe corralons

- 10 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 11 of 32

1 in San Luis. SAMI provided no transport from its former San Luis corralon to any of the

2 groves to be harvested during the 06-07 harvest season.

3

56. Richard De Leon testified that he made this decision to stop operations from

4 the San Luis corralon because when SAMI heldits annual meeting at the McDonald’s in San

5 Luis prior to the 06-07 season, only two of the five foremen from SAMI’s previous season,

6 Leobardo Aguirre and Julio De La Rocha , appeared. Absent were Jose Castano, Jose

7 Gonzales and Humberto Gaxiola. Mr. De Leon testified that he was told by Oscar Aguayo

8 Jr., who he relied on to set up the meeting, that Aguayo could not contact Mr. Castano. Mr.

9 Aguayo also appa rently told Mr. De Leon that he had heard that Jose Gonzalez and

10 Humberto Gaxiola were going to work for Yuma Mesa—a competing farm labor contractor.

11

57. Although Mr. De Leon knew that in the past the foremen began to reassemble

12 their crews after the annual m eeting at the McDonalds in Sa n Luis, he did not tell Mr.

13 Aguirre, or Mr. De La Rocha at the McDonald’s m eeting either to assem ble or not to

14 assemble their crews. SAMI eventually hired Mr. Aguirre and Mr. De La Rocha during the

15 06-07 harvest season to supervise the H-2A crews at White Wing. Neither Mr. Aguirre nor

16 Mr. De La Rocha affirm atively recruited any of their form er crew m embers to work for

17 SAMI for the 06-07 harvest season.

18

58. No testimony suggested that SAMI m ade any further effort to contact Mr.

19 Gonzalez or Mr. Gaxiola to c onfirm whether they would be working elsewhere. Both

20 testified that they were unaware of any McDonald’s meeting being held prior to the 06-07

21 harvest season. Foreman Jose Gonzalez acknowledged in his testimony that he was never

22 promised work by SAMI prior to the 06-07 season. When his crew members made inquiry

23 that year, he told themthat he did not get called by SAMI. He did not tell themwhy because

24 he did not know why. He was not promised employment by SAMI, he just expected it would

25 happen.

26

59. Foreman Humberto Gaxiola testified that during his previous employment for

27 SAMI, Oscar Aguayo would contact him a week or two before the season was to start and

28 confirm employment of his crew for that season. After he was contacted by Aguayo, Gaxiola

- 11 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 12 of 32

1 would begin contacting those who worked for him, and recruiting new workers if necessary.

2 In the 06-07 season, Gaxiola was never contacted by Aguayo or SAMI, and so he did not

3 contact his crew. That year, when members of his crew asked him when they were starting

4 he told them he had not been contacted by SAMI. When other companies started working

5 that season, he went to work for another company.

6

60. Prior to making its decision to base its operations uniquely out of White Wing,

7 SAMI did recruit at least one San Luis based crew.

8

61. SAMI, through Richard De Leon, arranged for a meeting with Mr. Castano at

9 a gas station in which he extended employment to Mr. Castano’s crew for the 06-07 season.

10 Mr. Castano testified that he thereafter went out and recruited his crew, informing them that

11 they would be em ployed by SAMI. After his m eeting with Mr. Castano, Mr. De Leon

12 determined that SAMI would not actively recruit, employ or transport San-Luis based crews

13 to harvest the groves in Yuma Valley or elsewhere. Despite these new determinations, Mr.

14 De Leon never had any subse quent conversations with Mr. Castano to inform him that

15 SAMI would not be em ploying his crew, or that his crew would have to either reside at

16 White Wing (free of charge) or arrange to travel there on a daily basis.

17

62. According to Mr. Castano, when it becam e clear that SAMI would not be

18 hiring his crew or transporting them to groves from the San Luis corralon, most of his crew

19 subsequently obtained work with another farm labor contractor, Border Harvesting, for the

20 06-07 se ason. Nevertheless, due to their earlier erroneous belief that they would be

21 employed by SAMI, and the later start by other farm labor contractors, they started such

22 employment approximately two weeks after SAMI began harvesting.

23

63. Harold Appling testified that sometime in July of 2006 Oscar Aguayo Jr. told

24 him that harvest season would begin about Septem ber 10th in the 06-07 harvest year. He

25 accordingly showed up at the corralon about that time and, when he discovered that SAMI

26 was not hiring, it took himbetween a week and two weeks to get a different job with another

27 harvester.

28

64. During the 06-07 harvest season, SAMI brought the H-2A workers that it

- 12 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 13 of 32

1 employed through the port of entry at San Luis and had buses available at a public parking

2 lot close to the border in San Luis to transport the H-2A workers to White Wing.

3

65. Cornelio Nunez-Gonzalez testified that when he witnessed this he approached

4 his previous foreman, Leobardo Aguirre, and “asked him for my job.” He was referred by

5 Mr. Aguirre to Richard De Leon, who indicated to him that SAMI would not be hiring

6 workers from the “San Luis” area this season. Mr. Nunez testified tha t he was upset that

7 SAMI was hiring foreign workers to do the work he had done in the past.

8

66. Pedro Lubiano-Cisneros testified that he asked his previous forem an, Julio

9 Cesar De La Rocha, for a job when he was in front of the bus picking up workers in the 06-

10 07 season. The more credible evidence, however, demonstrates that Mr. Lubiano-Cisneros

11 had not worked for Julio Cesar De La Rocha in the past, had not worked for SAMI in the

12 previous year, had never done extensive work for SAMI, and was already under the employ

13 of a different harvester for the 06-07 harvest season. The Court, thus does not find credible

14 Mr. Lubiano-Cisneros’s testimony that he applied for a White Wing job fromSAMI during

15 the 06-07 harvest season.

16

67. Alejandro Duarte said he asked Salvador Covarrubias for a job at the border

17 when they were importing H-2As. “Salvador was there and I asked himfor work personally.

18 But his answer was the same: that only contract workers will be working.” Nevertheless,

19 the court does not find this testimony credible. Alejandro testified that he wanted to go back

20 to work for SAMI. Yet the submitted documentary evidence demonstrates that Alejandro had

21 only worked for SAMI for very short periods inthe past and he testified that he already had

22 a new job.

23

68. Raul Garcia Almeida testified that Oscar Agauyo Jr. was waiting at SAMI’s

24 corralon to instruct workers that SAMI wa s not hiring. Octavio Serrano, who was in the

25 courtroom during Mr. Almeida’s testimony, testified that he had a similar discussion with

26 Leobardo Aguirre who was waiting at SAMI’s corralon to instruct workers that SAMI was

27 not hiring. Gabriel Vargas, said that Oscar Agauyo Sr. was waiting at SAMI’s corralon to

28 instruct workers that SAMI was not hiring. Neverthe less, the Court does not find this

- 13 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 14 of 32

1 testimony credible because SAMI did not rent a corralon for the 06-07 harvest season. Since

2 it did not lease a corralon at San Luis, the Court finds it incredible that Defendants

3 supervisors and foremen were waiting there solely for the purpose of telling Plaintiffs that

4 they would not be rehired.

5

69. Although there was testimony at trial that Plaintiffs would have been willing

6 to take a harvesting job at White Wing and eitherreside in the barracks there or pay for their

7 own daily commute, the Court does not find such testimony credible. The testimony was that

8 it takes between two to three hours one-way to c ommute from San Luis to White Wing,

9 depending upon whether the transport is by car or by bus. There was credible testiomny that

10 San Luis workers would not go to White Wing for jobs. F urther, em ployees such as

11 Plaintiffs who lost their previous positions working for one farmlabor contractor operating

12 out of the San Luis corralons were able to relatively quickly find another harvesting job there

13 that would not entail relocation to White Wing.Finally, in their responses to interrogatories

14 most of the Plaintiffs indicated they had formed no intent to work at White Wing during the

15 06-07 harvest season at the tim e they answered their interrogatories, suggesting tha t such

16 intent was formed after the initiation of this claim.

17

70. Although there was evidence presented at trial that a number of years before

18 the 06-07 harvest season a few of the Plaintiffswho now live at San Luis had done isolated

19 work at White Wing, and even stayed at th e barracks during short periods, there wa s no

20 credible evidence that suggested that there was a custom or practice in 06-07 or in at least

21 several years preceding it, of recruiting agricultural workers at the San Luis corralons to

22 reside and/or work the harvest season in the barracks at White Wing.

23

71. On February 9, 2007, still during the harvest season, Plaintiffs filed a charge

24 of employment discrimination under 8 U.S.C. § 1324b with the United States Departm ent

25 of Justice based on SAMI’s employment of H-2A workers. Plaintiffs withdrew the charge

26 on September 7, 2007. This charge against SAMIwas then dismissed by the Department of

27 Justice.

28

- 14 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 15 of 32

1

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

2

Plaintiffs assert that, am ong other things, Defendants’ failure to com ply with the

3 regulatory requirements of the H-2A program evidences Defendants’ intent to discriminate

4 against the nine U.S. citizen Plaintiffs that bring the § 1981 claim. Plaintiffs also claimthat

5 the regulatory requirements of the H-2A programeither constitute an enforceable “working

6 arrangement” between Plaintiffs and Defendants under the AWPA, or have been by law

7 incorporated into the contracts between Defendants and Plaintiffs as explicit provisions of

8 those contracts. In either case, Plaintiffs contend that any violation of the H-2A program

9 regulations constitutes a violation of the AWPA as to all 171 Plaintiffs.

10 I. The H-2A Program

11

The H-2A program allows an employer who anticipates a shortage of available U.S.

12 workers to apply to the United States Department of Labor for certification to bring into the

13 country a certain num ber of tem porary, non-im migrant foreign workers to accom plish

14 specified labor during specified periods. Employers anticipating the need for H-2A workers

15 are required to submit applications containing detailed information, including specifying the

16 work to be done, its location, the anticipated period of the em ployment, the number of

17 workers necessary to accomplish the labor, and the terms of the proposed employment. The

18 application m ust also include an agreem ent to abide by the assurances required by the

19 regulations pertaining to the recruitment of U.S. workers.See, e.g., 20 C.F.R. §§ 655.101(b),

20 655.102(d) (2006).3 These assurances are set fort h in 20 C.F.R. § 655.103(d), (e) and (f).

21 The requirements set forth in 20 C.F.R. § 655.103(d)(4), which is the regulation principally

22 at issue, include cooperating with and assisting the state employment agency (in this case

23 the Department of Economic Security (“DES”)) in publicizing the job opportunities, taking

24 referrals for candidates, being available to provide interviews for such candidates, running

25 advertisements with specified inform ation in the newspapers, a nd c ontacting “qualified

26

27

3Unless otherwise stated the text of all regulations cited is fromthe April 2006 version

of the Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Which was the version fo the regula tions in

28 place at the time of the events at issue here.

- 15 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 16 of 32

1 workers in other areas of the State a nd/or nation by letter and/or by telephone.”

2

The application must be submitted at least 45 days prior to the time that the employer

3 needs H-2A workers. Id. at § 655.101(c). It must also be filed with DES which will also

4 recruit any U.S. workers who may be willing to accept the offered employment. Id., see also

5 Id. at § 655.104.

6

Certifying officers within the Department of Labor are required to conduct an initial

7 review of the applic ation within seven days of its subm ission to determ ine if it contains

8 sufficient complying information to be “accepted for consideration and [whether] it meets

9 the regulatory standards.” Id. at § 655.101(c)(2), see also 655.100(a)(4). If the certifying

10 officer determines that the application thus qualifies, the Department of Labor issues notice

11 to the employer to that effect. Id. at §§ 655.101(c)(2), 655.104(b). Among other things, the

12 notice inform s the em ployer of the specific efforts it m ust make while the application is

13 being considered “to carry out the assurances contained in § 655.103 with respect to the

14 recruitment of U.S. workers.” 20 C.F.R. § 655.105 (a). In formulating those requirements,

15 the certifying officer considers any information she or he may receive fromothers “that there

16 are a significant number of able and qualified U.S. workers who, if recruited, would likely

17 be willing to m ake themselves available for work at the tim e and place needed.” Id. In

18 making this determ ination the certifying officer “shall take into account other recent

19 recruiting efforts in those are as and will attem pt to avoid requiring em ployers to futilely

20 recruit in areas where there are a significant number of local employers recruiting for U.S.

21 workers for the same types of occupations.” Id.

22

Thereafter, the certifying officer provides “overall direction to the employer and the

23 State agency with respect to the recruitment of U.S. workers.” Id. at § 655.105(b). Based

24 upon the success of the em ployer and the state agency in recruiting applicants for the

25 position, the certifying officer must determine within twenty days prior to the time when the

26 work is to begin whether to grant or deny the application, in whole or in part. Id. at §

27 655.105(d). Applications are to be granted ifthe certifying officer “has determined that the

28 employer has complied with the recruitment assurances and the adverse effect criteria . . . by

- 16 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 17 of 32

1 the date specified.” Id. at § 655.106(b)(1).

2

To further protect U.S. workers, once a n application has been granted, program

3 regulations require an employer to hire any qualified U.S. workers who apply for the same

4 employment performed by the H-2A workers during the first 50 percent of the term of the

5 H-2A contract. Id. at § 655.103(e).

6

Further, the H-2A regulations set forth administrative remedies for those instances in

7 which an H-2A application involves possible fraud or material misrepresentation. Id. at §

8 655.108. There are additional administrative remedies provided when, after an application

9 has been granted, the certifying officer “has reason to believe that an employer violated a

10 material term or condition of the H-2A certification.”Id. at § 655.110 These administrative

11 procedures provide for investigation, hearing, and classification of the extent of violation,

12 and for penalties, including the em ployer’s disqualification from consideration for H-2A

13 workers in the following years. Id.

14 II. Discrimination Claim (42 U.S.C. § 1981)

15

To prevail on their § 1981 claim , the nine Plaintiffs bringing this claim m ust

16 demonstrate that it is more probable than not that the Defendants intentionally discriminated

17 against them because they are United States citizens.See, e.g., Robinson v. Adams,847 F.2d

18 1315, 1316 (9th Cir. 1987),cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1105 (1989);Craig. v. Los Angeles Cnty.,

19 626 F.2d 659, 668 (9th Cir. 1980),cert. denied, 450 U.S. 919 (1981). Plaintiffs have not met

20 that burden.

21

The Court finds it more likely than not that Plaintiffs were not hired for the positions

22 at White Wing because they did not apply for em ployment there. Plaintiffs m ay have

23 refrained from applying for work at White Wing either because they were not aware of the

24 availability of such work, or because they believed that seasonal agricultural work which

25 would allow them to live in their own homes would be made available for the 06-07 harvest

26 season at the corralons at San Luis, through SAMoIr otherwise. The fact that such work was

27 not provided by SAMI does not constitute intentional discrim ination by the Defendants

28 against the nine U.S . citizen P laintiffs, especially when such work was advertised and

- 17 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 18 of 32

1 Plaintiffs did not apply for it.

2

The workers that SAMI hired a nd transported from the corralon at San Luis to the

3 groves to be harvested in Yuma Valley during the 04-05 and 05-06 harvest seasons, including

4 all 171 Plaintiffs, were, by definition, seasonal agricultural workers. A “‘seasonal

5 agricultural worker’ . . . is not required to be absent overnight fromhis permanent place of

6 residence” 29 U.S.C. § 1802(10)(A).4

7

The terms of the only employment offered by SAMI during the 06-07 harvest season,

8 however, included housing at, and work base d from, White Wing, w hich was at least 90

9 miles away from San Luis. The standard terms of employment thus offered roomand board,

10 and contem plated ne ither the SAMI em ployees being able to live at hom e, nor SAMI

11 providing daily transportation from San Luis to the fields to be harvested or to White Wing

12

During the previous seasons from03-04 through 06-07, none of the Plaintiffsapplied

13 for or sought work at White Wing. Plaintiffs lal lived within the area in which the migratory

14 farm work available at White Wing had been advertised both by radio and in the newspaper

15 as well as through the state job service recruitment. Credible testimony at trial established

16 that at least some, if not all, workers recruited at the corralon at San Luis would not live in

17 the housing at White Wing and work fromthere. None of the § 1981 Plaintiffs responded to

18 such advertisements or sought employment in which they would have been situated out of

19 White Wing. They were aware that H-2A workers harvested from White Wing during the

20 citrus harvest season.

21

Further, owners of citrus groves in central Arizona did not recruit harvest workers at

22 the corralons at San Luis for a number of years preceding the 06-07 harvest season. This is

23 because available workers do not come to the corralons at San Luis to be recruited until the

24 employers indicate that the harvest season is about to start. And e mployers for fields in

25

26

4By contrast, a “migrant agricultural worker” is, among other things “required to be

27

absent overnight from his permanent place of residence.” 29 U.S.C. § 1802(8)(A). H-2A workers are separately regulated and, by definition, are excluded frombeing either seasonal

28 or agricultural workers. 29 U.S.C. § 1802(8)(B)(ii) & (10)(B)(iii).

- 18 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 19 of 32

1 central Arizona need to identify the workers willing to work their fields well before the

2 beginning of harvest season to determ ine whether they m ay, pursua nt to regulatory

3 requirements, import H-2A workers to harvest their groves. As a result, it was not practical

4 for U.S. employers with fields in central Arizona to wait until the beginning of harvest season

5 to recruit at the San Luis corralons for harvest workers.

6

For the 06-07 harvest season Defendants actively recruited U.S. workers to accept the

7 positions offered at White Wing in the way that SAMCO had done in the previous three

8 years. Defendant SAMI ran radio spots and newspaper advertisements in the Yuma area

9 advertising the positions and describing th e terms on which such em ployment would be

10 offered. The seasonal agricultural workers previously employed by SAMI, who are Plaintiffs

11 here, all lived within the area in which the migratory farm work available at White Wing had

12 been advertised both by radio and in the newspaper as well as through the state job service

13 recruitment. None of them responded to such advertisements.

14

Arizona Work Connections recruited and set up job interviews for candidates with

15 SAMI for the White Wing employment at pre-appointed times and locations. In the absence

16 of sufficient workers applying for the White Wing based em ployment, the Department of

17 Labor authorized SAMI to em ploy 150 H-2A workers to be housed at White Wing. In

18 following this process SAMI m erely followe d the sam e recruitm ent procedure to hire

19 roughly the same number of H-2A workers to work and reside in the same location as had

20 its predecessor SAMCO for the previous thr ee years. SAMI did so with the active

21 participation and authorization of both the U.S. Departm ent of Labor and Arizona’s

22 Department of Economic Security.

23

Defendants do not need to do m ore than th is to refute the argument that they had

24 discriminatory intent in failing to hire the § 1981 Plaintiffs in this case for the 06-07 harvest

25 season.

26

Plaintiffs assert that Defendants’ discriminatory intent is nevertheless established by

27 their failure to com ply with the requirem ent set forth in the acceptance letter sent to

28 Defendants by the Departm ent of Labor on June 27, 2006. In tha t acceptance letter, the

- 19 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 20 of 32

1 Department of Labor instructed SAMI to “Contact former U.S. employees, and solicit their

2 return to the job.” But, while SAMI had previously employed seasonal agricultural workers

3 at the corralons in San Luis, SAMI ha d never previously employed migratory agricultural

4 workers who lived and worked out of White Wing. SAMI’s seasonal agricultural workers

5 at San Luis did not constitute former migrant farm workers from White Wing. There were,

6 therefore, no former U.S. employees for SAMI to solicit “to return to th[at] job.” Because

7 SAMI was a first tim e applicant for H-2A workers in Arizona, the Departm ent of La bor

8 certifying officer would have had a rational basis to certify SAMI’s H-2A request.

9

Plaintiffs also argue that Defendants’ assetrion that it decided tochange its operational

10 hub to White Wing in 06-07 is not worthy of credence because it is inconsistent with

11 Defendants’ testimony at trial that they decided to quit their operations out of the San Luis

12 corralon only after three of their five foremen did not show up at the at the MacDonald’s in

13 San Luis for the meeting prior to the 06-07 harvest season.

14

A number of facts are uncontested, however. First, it is uncontested that the 06-07

15 harvest season was the first season in whic h SAMI would be assum ing responsibility for

16 harvesting Marlin’s groves in central Arizona at White Wing, Eloy, and Maricopa.

17 Previously that part of Marlin’s harvest had been accom plished by SAMCO. Further, the

18 evidence is uncontested, that after the pre-harvest meeting at McDonalds, Richard De Leon

19 did arrange to meet with Jose Castano anddid tell him that his crew would be employed out

20 of San Luis for the 06-07 harvest season. T hus, the Court concludes that SAMI did not

21 determine to wholly abandon its operations out of San Luis until som etime after it had

22 offered employment to Jose Castano and his crew. This was, at the most, only a few weeks

23 before the harvest season began, and it was also after SAMI had subimtted its application for

24 H-2A workers to the Department of Labor. As a result, SAMI had not determined, when it

25 submitted its H-2A application, that it would not be hiring U.S. workers at the corralon at San

26 Luis, and the authorization it re ceived to hire H-2A workers was not used as a ruse to

27 discriminate against the nine U.S. citizen Plaintiffs.

28

Plaintiffs also assert that Defendants’ f ailure to com ply with the fifty percent rule

- 20 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 21 of 32

1 demonstrates intent to discrim inate. The fifty percent rule requires an em ployer of H-2A

2 workers to hire any U.S. worke r who a pplies for em ployment being perform ed by H-2A

3 workers anytime during the first half of the H-2Acontract term. After carefully listening to

4 the testimony offered at trial, the Court cannot determine that any of the § 1981 Plaintiffs

5 actually subsequently applied to Defendants for what would for them have been migratory

6 agricultural work at White Wing. Only two of the nine § 1981 Plaintiffs, Raul Garcia

7 Almeida and Octavio Serrano, testified that they asked someone at SAMI to have their jobs

8 back. Not only does the Court not find their testimony credible, for the reasons stated above,

9 but, asking to have back a job that was seasonal agricultural em ployment, is not the sam e

10 thing as applying for a position as a migratory farm worker.

11

During the season at issue, the H-2A workers at White Wing received the same pay

12 and benefits as had been offered to U. S. workers for that em ployment. Nevertheless,

13 Plaintiffs argue, SAMI was not required to pay the employer’s tax for social security on H-

14 2A workers that it was required to withhold and pay for U.S. workers. The Court, however,

15 does not, in this case, find this a credible ba sis on which to infer an intent to disc riminate.

16 SAMI was employed by Marlin on a cost-plus basis. For the 06-07 harvest season Marlin

17 payed SAMI its labor cost plus an overhead of 42.5%. Therefore, to the extent that SAMI

18 would have had to pay the employer’s tax for social security for some or all of its employees,

19 these amounts would have presumably been reimbursed, together with the 42.5% overhead

20 to SAMI fromMarlin. It would not, therefore, have been cheaper for SAMI to epmloy H-2A

21 workers. Even had the extra withholding caused the Marlin Defendants additional expense,

22 Defendants have convinced the Cour t tha t the additional costs incurred in recruiting,

23 transporting, housing and feeding the H-2A workers more than offset the additional expense

24 incurred by the additional withholding. There was, therefore, no sufficient motivation in the

25 expense incurred in hiring the nine United Statescitizens as workers, to suppose that it was

26 a motivation for discriminating against them.

27

In short, the Court finds that the § 1981 Plaintiffs have not met their burden of proof

28 of establishing that Defendants intentionally discriminated against them due to their status

- 21 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 22 of 32

1 as United States Citizens.

2 III. AWPA Claims

3

The AWPA sets forth rem edial statutes designed to protect “seasonal agricultural

4 workers” and “migrant agricultural workers.” All parties acknowledge that Plaintiffs were

5 seasonal agricultural workers within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. § 1802(10)(A).” The Court

6 will thus proceed with an AWPA analysis under the statutory protections for seasonal

7 agricultural workers set forth in 29 U.S.C. §§ 1831 and 1832 (2009). 5 The AWPA

8 definitions for both “seasonal agricultural workers” and “m igrant agricultural workers”

9 explicitly exclude H-2A workers. 29 U.S.C. § 1802(8)(B)(ii) & (10)(B)(iii) (2009).

10

A. Working Arrangements (29 U.S.C. § 1832(c))

11

Pursuant to the requirements of 29 U.S.C. § 1832(c) “no farm labor contractor . . .

12 shall without justification, violate the term s of any working arrangem ent m ade by that

13 contractor . . . with any seasonal agricultural worker.” Plaintiffs claimthat Defendants have

14 violated the AWPA by violating working arra ngements between the Defendants and the

15 Plaintiffs in four separate ways.

16

1. End of Season Statements.

17

Plaintiffs first claim that Defendants created a “working arrangement” with Plaintiffs

18 that they would be employed for the 2006-07 harvest season by engaging in the custom or

19

20

5Despite the stipulation in the pretrial order that Plaintiffs are “seasonal agricultural

workers.” Plaintiffs also appear to seek the statutory protections afforded to “m igratory

21 agricultural workers” under the statute. Although separate subchapters apply to“seasonal

22

agricultural workers” and “migrant agricultural workers” under the statute, the protections are, in most respects, identical. Farm labor contractors are prohibited by the statute from

23 violating, without justification, the term s of any “working a rrangement made by [a farm labor] contractor, employer or association with any seasonal agricultural worker” or migrant
24 agricultural worker. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1822(c) & 1832(c). The AWPA further prohibits any such

25 employer from “providing false or misleading information” of a certain type to migrant or seasonal agricultural workers. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1821(f) & 1831(e). Although there are som e
26 distinctions that apply as it pertains to the separate statutes protecting migrant farm workers

27

from being provided with false or misleading information, they are not relevant to the Court’s analysis in this case. The analysis therefore, is the same regardless of whether either or both

28 statutory protections are applied.

- 22 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 23 of 32

1 practice of having their supervisors or foremen state to Plaintiffs at the finish of their work

2 during the 06-07 harvest that they “would see them again next ye ar,” or equivalent

3 statements. Even assuming the truth of such testimony, such statements between Defendants

4 and Plaintiffs fail to create a “working arrangement” protected by AWPA that would require

5 the Defendants to rehire Plaintiffs as seasonal agricultural workers for the 06-07 harvest

6 season.

7

As is apparently uncontested here, Marlin’s available fields to ha rvest in the Yuma

8 Valley declined from the 05-06 season to the 06-07 season. And the very nature of seasonal

9 agricultural work is dependent upon a number of factors. To the extent that SAMI’s foremen

10 may have said something to their workers to the effect that they would see themagain during

11 the 06-07 harvest season, it cannot reasonably be interpreted as a “working arrangem ent”

12 binding SAMI to give them employment as seasonal agricultural workers during the 06-07

13 harvest season. As Foreman Gonzalez testified, he did not understand this statement to be

14 a promise by SAMI to employ him the next year, but he did expect that he would be able to

15 work for SAMI again the following year. Such an expectation, however, does not give rise

16 to a “working arrangement” enforceable under the statute.

17

Even were the Court to find that a working arrangement existed, it would not accept

18 Plaintiffs claim that such “working arra ngement” extended beyond the actual type of

19 employment Defendants had previously offered to Plaintiffs. That is, Plaintiffs had

20 previously been employed by SAMI as seasonal agricultural workers. They now assert that,

21 under the AWPA, the assurance that SAMI would see themagain next year means that SAMI

22 bound itself to reserve migrant agricultural work for them, even when they had never been

23 so employed by SAMI and even when they had failed to apply for the migrant agricultural

24 work when it had been advertised in their com munity. Even if an enforceable working

25 arrangement existed under these circumstances it would not extend so far.

26

2. Letters Prior to Harvest Season

27

There was no custom and pra ctice by which Defendants sent out letters to past

28 employees prior to the beginning of a new harvest season to solicit their re-epmloyment with

- 23 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 24 of 32

1 Defendants. The evidence demonstrates that DES, but not SAMI, sent out letters to former

2 SAMCO workers prior to the beginning of the 04-05 season. Defendants’ failure, therefore,

3 to send out letters to its past seasonal agricultural workers advertising migrant farm worker

4 positions at White Wing did not violate any “w orking arrangement” it had with Plaintiffs.

5

3. H-2A Regulations

6

Plaintiffs’ base their H-2A argument on two separate premises. First they claim that

7 Defendants did not com ply with an H-2A regulation pertaining to the recruiting of U.S.

8 workers. Second they assert that a few of the Plaintiffs a sked to be re-em ployed by

9 Defendants and were not employed in violation of the fifty percent rule.

10

a. H-2A Recruitment Regulations and Orders (20 C.F.R.

§ 103(d)(3))

11

Defendants ran both radio and newspaper ads in the Yuma area designed to recruit

12

workers to their White Wing facility prior to recruiting H-2A workers. De fendants also

13

coordinated with DES Job Service to recruit such U.S. workers. Plaintiffs assert, however,

14

that Defendants failed to comply with 20 C.F.R. § 655.103(d)(3) which requires Defendants

15

to “cooperate with [DES] in the active recruitment of U.S. workers by . . . (3) Cooperating

16

with [DES] and independently contacting farmlabor contractors, migrant workers, and other

17

potential workers in other areas of the State and/or Nation by letter and/or telephone.”

18

The H-2A regulations allow the Department of Labor to give content to this otherwise

19

limitless obligation by providing notice in the clearance order “of the specific efforts which

20

will be expected fromthem during the following weeks to carry out the assurances contained

21

in § 655.103 with respect to the recruitment of U.S. workers.” 20 C.F.R. § 655.105. On June

22

27, 2006, the U.S. Department of Labor issued its clearance order in which it defined this

23

obligation as “contacting all form er U.S. worke rs, soliciting their return to the job, and

24

documenting its attempts to do so.” Defendants stipulate that they personally contacted no

25

U.S. workers between then and the time that the Department of Labor approved their H-2A

26

application, and, as a result, they doc umented no such efforts. The Departm ent of Labor,

27

nevertheless, approved Defendants’ H-2A application in sufficient time to allow Defendants

28

- 24 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 25 of 32

1 to recruit H-2A workers prior to the beginning of the 06-07 harvest season.

2

Instead of asking this Court to review the Department of Labor’s determination that

3 the Defendants had adequately complied with their specific requirements for recruiting U.S.

4 workers, the Plaintiffs request that the Court deem those specific requirem ents as

5 incorporated into their “working arrangem ent” with the Plaintiffs under the AWPA as a

6 matter of law. They then ask the Court to im pose AWPA’s sta tutory dam ages on the

7 Defendants for failing to qualify with the conditions imposed upon them by the Department

8 of Labor, even though the Department of Labor determined that Defendants had adequately

9 complied with their recruitment requirements.

10

Such a request is unworkable and unfair. Plaintiffs provide this Court with no case

11 in which a court has incorporated H-2A requirements pertaining to the recruitment of U.S.

12 employees a s pa rt of the “working arrangem ents” between U.S. em ployees and their

13 employer protected under the AWPA. To be sure for purpose s of applying the AWPA’s

14 protections, the “working arrangem ent” between agricultural workers a nd their em ployer

15 may include specific worker protections included in federal or state law. These would

16 include laws that govern the em ployment relationship between the em ployee and the

17 employer, such as state laws specifying the wages that are due the employee. Nevertheless,

18 an AWPA “working arrangem ent” gene rally constitutes only “the term s of em ployment

19 actually communicated between employer and employee.” Doe v. D.M. Camp & Sons, 624

20 F. Supp. 2d 1153, 1172 (E.D. Cal. 2008)S. ee also Valenzuela v. Giumarra Vineyards Corp.,

21 619 F. Supp. 2d 985, 990–91 (E.D. Cal. 2008). “It does not automatically encompass any

22 and all statutes and regulations governing agricultural employment.”Valenzuela, 619 F. Supp.

23 2d at 993.

24

The specific recruitment obligations at issue here are imposed by the certifying officer

25 on the employer as deemed necessary for compliance with 20 C.F.R. § 655.103(d)(3). They

26 are not “terms of employment actually communicated between employer and employee.”

27 D.M. Camp & Sons, 624 F. Supp. 2d. at 1172. They do not impose a direct responsibility on

28 the employer with respect to any U.S. worker who is a Plaintiff in this action. The regulatory

- 25 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 26 of 32

1 obligation to “independently contac t[] farm labor contractors, m igrant workers, and other

2 potential workers in other areas of the State and/or Nation by letter and/or telephone,” 20

3 C.F.R. § 655.103(d)(3), is designed to be interpreted by the Department of Labor with the

4 undefined regulatory requirement being adjusted to the specific circumstances of each case.

5 The regulations specify that it is up to the certifying officer to deterimne “the specific efforts

6 which will be expected from [the employer] during the [application period] to carry out the

7 assurances contained in § 655.103 with respect to the rec ruitment of U.S. workers.” 20

8 C.F.R. § 655.105. It is further up to the certyifing officer to determine whether the employer

9 has complied with that obligation.

10

Thus the recruiting requirement which Plaintiff would have the Court incorporate into

11 the working arrangem ent was designed to be im posed by the certifying officer; its

12 requirements were to be interpreted and adjusted by the certifying officer; and the certifying

13 officer is the appropriate person mandated under the regulations to determine compliance.

14 Further, these considerations are to be ev aluated in the context of the certifying officer

15 determining whether an H-2A cer tification should be granted to the em ployer. These

16 recruitment regulations and others like them are not part of the “working arrangem ent”

17 between an em ployer and its e mployees. To recognize it as such would contradict the

18 clearance order’s purpose of defining the employer’s obligation, would afford no deference

19 to the Departm ent of Labor, which, according to the regulations them selves, is the

20 appropriate entity to decide the question, and would subject the Defendants to potentially

21 expensive and inconsistent determinations concerning their compliance with the recruitment

22 obligations imposed by the Department of Labor.

23

In cases like this one in which the em ployer has not previously hired m igrant farm

24 workers at a particular location, it has no previous employees that can be efficiently recruited

25 to return to work. And, nothing about the general regulation, or DES’s implementation of

26 it in this case, afforded any specific obligation with respect to any of the Plaintiffs.

27

Further, to the extent a party obtains its certification through fra

ud or

28 misrepresentation, the H-2A regulations provide an a dministrative remedy through which

- 26 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 27 of 32

1 Plaintiffs could have pursued relief that would restrict, to varying degrees, the H-2A

2 activities of the Defendant. 20 C.F.R. § 655.108 (2006). Plaintiff sought no such relief. It

3 is, therefore, not appropriate in this instance to permit such relief by deeming the recruitment

4 requirements of the H-2A programincorporated into the “working arrangement” protections

5 of the AWPA.

6

Plaintiffs made no specific argument at trial, or in their pre or post-trial briefing, that

7 the number of acres that the Department of Labor had authorized Defendants to harvest in

8 the Yuma Valley with H-2A workers was incorporated into their working arrangement with

9 Plaintiffs or otherwise enforceable by the AWPA. In the absence of such an argument or

10 evidence,6 the Court need not decide whether the AWPA would prevent Plaintiffs from

11 exceeding those limits. The Court further notes that, at any rate, there is an administrative

12 procedure provided as part of the H-2A regulations through which Plaintiffs may seek relief

13 when Defendants fail to comply with the terms of the H-2A certification they have received

14 from the Department of Labor, such as the number of acres Defendants could harvest with

15 H-2A workers. 20 C.F.R. § 655.110 (2006) (indicating administrative procedure to follow

16 when the certifying officer “has reason to believethat an employer violated a material term

17 or condition of the H-2A certification”). Plaintiffs apparently pursued no such relief. In any

18

19

6In response to the Court’s questions at trial, Mr. De Leon indicated that in the 06-07

20 harvest SAMI attempted to harvest all the available acreage in Yuma Valley that had been harvested by both SAMI and SAMCO in previous years. Nevertheless, William .Chaney

21 testified that prior to the 06-07 harvest season, the Marlin entities had sold off and retired

22

some of its citrus acreage in the Yuma Valley, and he further testified that other farm labor contractors such as Dominguez and Galindo & Galindo had to be hired to complete the 06-07

23 harvest in the Yum a Valley since S AMI could not do so. In their written argum ents

submitted in this matter, Defendants have asserted that they did not harvest any more acres 24 in the Yum a Valley in the 06-07 ha rvest season than the 300 specific acres SAMI was

25 authorized to harvest by the De partment of Labor. Although Plaintiffs have subm itted a number of exhibits fromwhich the fields harvested by SAMI in the Yuma Valley that season
26 could possibly have been determined, Plaintiffs have not introduced evidence interpreting

27

the invoices or documents or otherwise suggesting that SAMI in fact harvested more than the 300 acres in Yuma Valley. Therefore, the Court cannot conclude based on the evidence

28 submitted that the amount exceeded the 300 acres authorized by the Department of Labor.

- 27 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 28 of 32

1 event, in the absence of sufficient evidence for the Court to determ ine whether, in fact,

2 Defendants exceeded the authorized lim it of their harvest in the Yum a Valley with H-2A

3 workers, the Court need not dete rmine whether such terms could be incorporated into the

4 AWPA’s protection of working arrangements between employer and employee.

5

c. H-2A Fifty Percent Rule (20 C.F.R. § 103(e))

6

In contrast to the recruitment provisions and certification provisions, the fifty percent

7 rule imposes an affirmative and specific duty on an H-2A employer with respect to its U.S.

8 employees or prospective employees. The fifty percent rule is not subject to interpretation

9 or adjustm ent by the Departm ent of Labor, and it does not relate to the certification

10 determination that the Department of Labor must make in a very specific and time-sensitive

11 period. It may, therefore, constitute part of the “working arrangement” between an H-2A

12 employer and a U.S . em ployee who applies for em ployment being perform ed by H-2A

13 workers during the first half of the contract period. The fifty percent rule provides that “the

14 employer . . . shall provide employment to any qualified eligible U.S. worker who applies

15 to the employer until 50% of the period of the work contract, under which the foreign worker

16 who is in the job was hired, has elapsed.” 20 C.F.R. § 103(e). The regulation further

17 provides that “the employer shall offer to provide housing and the other benefits, wages, and

18 working conditions required . . . to any such U.S. worker and shall not treat less favorably

19 than H-2A workers any U.S. worker referred or transferred pursuant to this assurance.” Id.

20

The Court, however, has no need to determ ine the question in this case because

21 Plaintiffs, ultim ately, have been unsuccessful in establishing at trial that any of them

22 subsequently applied for the White Wing employment. As the Court has already observed,

23 it does not consider the testimony of Raul Garcia Almeida, Octavio Serrano, Pedro Lubiano-

24 Cisneros or Alejandro Duarte to the effect that they asked to have their jobs back, credible.

25

Finally, Cornelio Nunez-Gonzalez testified that when he witnessed SAMI forem en

26 loading the H-2A workers on SAMI buses he approached his previous foreman, Leobardo

27 Aguirre, and asked to have his job back. Hetestified that he was referred by Mr. Aguirre to

28 Richard De Leon, who indicated to him tha t SAMI would not be hiring workers from the

- 28 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 29 of 32

1 “San Luis” area this season. Mr. Nunez testified that he was upset tha t SAMI was hiring

2 foreign workers to do the work he had done in the past. Although Richard De Leon firmly

3 denied having such a conversation with Mr. Nunez-Gonzalez, the Court need not resolve that

4 conflict here to determine that the fifty percent rule was not invoked.

5

To invoke the fifty percent rule, an em ployee must apply to the em ployer for the

6 employment being perform ed by H-2A workers. The questions pose d by counsel to Mr.

7 Nunez-Gonzalez all m ade it clear that Mr. Nunez-Gonzalez testified that he asked Mr.

8 Aguirre and Mr. De Leon to have his job “back.” Nevertheless, for the reasons already

9 discussed at length, SAMI offered no jobs for “seasonal agricultural workers” out of the

10 corralons at San Luis during the 06-07 harve st season, which was the job that Mr. Nunez-

11 Gonzalez had held with SAMI. To the extent that Mr. Nunez-Gonzales did ask to have his

12 job back, he was not asking to have employment at White Wing. SAMI had, previous to the

13 commencement of the season, advertised and offered positions out of White Wing to workers

14 in the San Luis area. None had applied for such employment which would have, for most

15 of them, been migratory farm work as opposed to seasonal agricultural work. The White

16 Wing work was the work that had been accepted and was being perform ed by the H-2A

17 workers. Based on his trial testimony, the Court concludes that Mr. Nunez-Gonzalez did not

18 apply for employment at White Wing.

19

Plaintiffs nevertheless allege that if and when any of the Plaintiffs did ask Defendants

20 for their jobs back, Defendants were under an obligation with respect to these Plaintiffs to

21 explain to them the term s of the em ployment that they were offering at White Wing.

22 However, the regulation imposes no such obligation. It is true that had such application for

23 employment at White Wing been m ade, the regulation obliges Defendants to “provide

24 housing and the other benefits, wages, and working conditions . . . to any such U.S. worker

25 and shall not treat less favorably than H-2A workers any U.S. worker referred or transferred

26 pursuant to this assurance.” 20 C.R.F. § 103(e). But this regulation does not im pose upon

27 Defendants the obligation to solicit applications from Plaintiffs for em ployment different

28 than that applied for by Plaintiffs in previous years.

- 29 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 30 of 32

1

4. Offer of Employment to Castano’s Crew

2

It is uncontested that just prior to the 06-07 harvest season Richard De Leon offered

3 employment with SAMI to Jose Castano and hicsrew. The Court further finds that when Mr.

4 De Leon did so, he knew that Jose Castano woudl begin to recruit his crew, and that his crew

5 would have a reasonable expectation of being employed by SAMI as seasonal agricultural

6 workers out of the corralon at San Luis for the 06-07 harvest season. Based on the evidence

7 adduced at trial, however, the Court determ ines that when De Leon offered the seasonal

8 agricultural employment to Castano and his crew, De Leon had not yet made the decision,

9 and thus did not know, that SAMI would not be offering seasonal agricultural employment

10 out of the corralons at San Luis. Therefore, his offer was not in violation of those sections

11 of the AWPA which prohibit knowingly providing false or m isleading information to a

12 migrant or seasonal agricultural worker “concerning the terms, conditions, or existence” of

13 employment. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1821(f) & 1831(e).7

14

Nevertheless, the Court further finds that initiating such recruiting directly prior to the

15 commencement of the harvest season at San Luiswas part of the standard practice between

16 SAMI and its San Luis-based crews. SAMI engaged in this practice to com mit working

17 crews to SAMI’s employment during the upcoming harvest season. When, after initiating

18 the recruitment of Mr. Castano’s crew, Defendants m ade the decision that they would not

19 provide employment to Mr. Castano’s crew or anybody else from the corralon at San Luis,

20 they violated the “working arrangement” that they had undertaken with Mr. Castano’s crew.

21 The Court further finds as a matter of fact that neither Mr. De Leon, nor anyone else at SAMI

22 took adequate steps to inform Mr. Castano or his crew prior to the beginning of the season

23 that S AMI would actually not be em ploying workers for th at season from the S an Luis

24 corralon. The Court further finds that, as a result, m any of the members of Mr. Castano’s

25

26

7To the extent that the Plaintiffs assert tha t the protections applicable to m igrant

27

agricultural workers apply, SAMI was, at this point, only recruiting Mr. Castano’s crew for seasonal agricultural labor, and thus only those AWP A protections pertaining to seasonal

28 agricultural workers are arguably applicable.

- 30 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 31 of 32

1 crew who had been recruited to work for S AMI for the 06-07 harvest season, were

2 unemployed for some period at the beginning of the harvest season while they sought work

3 with a different harvest employer. As a result, Defendants, as joint employers, violated the

4 provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 1832(c).

5

This violation entitles those workers, that the Court finds were actually recruited, to

6 statutory damages authorized by 29 U.S.C. § 1854. Plaintiffs seek an award of statutory

7 damages under the statute, and the statute au thorizes the Court to award “up to $500 per

8 plaintiff per violation.” 29 U.S.C. § 1854(c)(1) (2009).

9

The Court has reviewed the testimony of Mr. Castano and others at trial to identify

10 those Plaintiffs that Mr. Castano recruited for SAMI during the 06-07 harvest season. The

11 Court has then com pared the identified Plainti ffs with their work histories with SAMI to

12 assess (a) the likelihood that they were actually recruited by Mr. Castano to work for SAMI

13 for the 06-07 ha rvest season, (b) the likelihood that they suffered econom ic damages by

14 missing work they could have otherwise performed for SAMI while searching for work with

15 a different em ployer, (c) the pay that Plaintiffs would have received for work during the

16 period necessary to find other employment, and, (d), the lack of evidence that Plaintiffs amde

17 an attem pt to resolve the issues in dispute before the resort to litigation. 29 U.S.C.

18 § 1854(c)(2) (2009).

19

After conducting this analysis the Court awards the following am ounts to the

20 following Plaintiffs. The Court awards $500 in statutory dam ages to (1) Raul Garcia, (2)

21 Reynaldo Guerra Jim enez, (3) Fernando Dua rte Ochoa, (4) Alberto Miranda Haros, (5)

22 Antonio Fuentes, (6) Francisco Duarte Rascon,(7) Guadualupe Espinoza, (8) Jorge Delgado,

23 (9) Juan Rodriguez Orosco, and (10) Raul Garcia Almeida.

24

The Court awards $250 to (1) Gustava Zerega Espinoza, (2) Carlos Manuel Palacios

25 Torres, (3) Rafael Beltran Nunez, (4) AlfredoAvalos Barron, (5) Jesus Medina Uriarte, (6)

26 Jose Botillo Avila, (7) Pedro Angulo, (8) Saul Gonzales, (9) Marcos Aemzcua, (10) Teodoro

27 Loya Carillo.

28

The Court awards $150 to (1) Javier Rendon Aguilera, (2) Francisco Cervantes Gil,

- 31 -

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 93 Filed 03/27/12 Page 32 of 32

1 (3) Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, (4) Graciela Reyes Medina, (5) Jesus Antonio Penunuri, (6)

2 Jose Contreras, (7) Jose Sepulveda, and (8) Trinidad Medina.

3

Although there was testim ony that the following Plaintiffs were recruited by Jose

4 Castano, the Court finds in light of their past em ployment with SAMI either that it is not

5 credible that they were recruited by Mr. Castano, or that in equity, they did not suffer any

6 loss in transitioning from SAMI to anothe r e mployer in the 06-07 harvest season: (1)

7 Alejandro Duarte, (2) Jose Valdez, (3) Mario Castro, (4) Octavio Serrano, and (5) Se rgio

8 Amescua.

9

No other Plaintiffs are awarded relief on any of their other claims.

10

A form Judgment Order shall be lodged with the Clerk of the Courtwithin fourteen

11 (14) days of the date of this Order.

12

DATED this 27th day of March, 2012.

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

- 32 -

 
 Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 137-2 Filed 03/06/15 Page 1 of 4

NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
FEDERICO AGUILAR MURILLO; et al., No. 12-16272

FILED
FEB 06 2015
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

Plaintiffs - Appellants,

D.C. No. 2:07-cv-02581-GMS

v.
SERVICIOS AGRICOLAS MEX, INC.; et al.,

MEMORANDUM*

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
G. Murray Snow, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 10, 2014 San Francisco, California
Before: NOONAN, THOMAS, and BERZON, Circuit Judges.
Plaintiffs, farm workers with U.S. citizenship or lawful permanent residency,
appeal the district court’s judgment denying their claims under the Migrant and
Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (“AWPA”). We affirm. Because the
parties are familiar with the history of this case, we need not recount it here. We
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 137-2 Filed 03/06/15 Page 2 of 4
review questions of law de novo, Movsesian v. Victoria Versicherung AG, 670 F.3d 1067, 1071 (9th Cir. 2012), and factual findings for clear error, United States v. Richey, 632 F.3d 559, 563 (9th Cir. 2011).
The AWPA provides, in relevant part, for protections for seasonal agricultural workers, like plaintiffs, and migrant agricultural workers. 29 U.S.C. § 1831. Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 1832(c), “[n]o farm labor contractor, agricultural employer, or agricultural association shall, without justification, violate the terms of any working arrangement made by that contractor, employer or association with any seasonal agricultural worker.”
The H-2A program permits U.S. employers anticipating a shortage of available U.S. workers needed for agricultural jobs to apply to the U.S. Department of Labor (“DOL”) for certification to hire non-immigrant foreign workers to perform the jobs on a temporary basis. See 8 U.S.C. 1188. Such arrangements are not permissible when U.S. workers’ wages or working conditions would be adversely affected. 20 C.F.R. § 655.101(b).1
The applicable regulation, 20 C.F.R. § 655.103(d)(3), requires H-2A employers to work with the relevant state agency (in this case the Arizona
1 C.F.R. references are to the April 2006 version of the C.F.R., as that was the version in effect at the time of the events at issue in this case.
2

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 137-2 Filed 03/06/15 Page 3 of 4
Department of Economic Security (“DES”)) in recruiting U.S. workers. That regulation is limited, however, by 20 C.F.R. § 655.105, which invests in the DOL the authority to specify the recruiting efforts that an applicant must make in order to comply with § 655.103.
Pursuant to § 655.105, the DOL required that defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. (“SAMI”) “[c]ontact former U.S. employees, and solicit their return to the job.” We assume for the purposes of this disposition, without deciding, that the DOL’s requirement formed part of a “working arrangement” between the plaintiffs and SAMI.
Plaintiffs assert that SAMI did not comply with this requirement because SAMI did not contact U.S. workers who had harvested Marlin’s groves from the San Luis corralón in prior years. SAMI acknowledges as much. Accordingly, SAMI did not document any such efforts in their filings with the DOL. Nevertheless, the DOL approved SAMI’s H-2A applications. In other words, the DOL determined that SAMI had complied with the requirement to contact its former U.S. workers “and solicit their return to the job.”
Plaintiffs contend that the DOL was unaware that SAMI did not contact its San Luis former workers, and that, had it been so aware, the DOL would have denied the application. But plaintiffs provide no evidence showing that SAMI’s
3

Case 2:07-cv-02581-GMS Document 137-2 Filed 03/06/15 Page 4 of 4
filings were inaccurate, dishonest, or otherwise deficient. Even more importantly, there is no evidence that the DOL was ignorant of any aspect of SAMI’s recruiting practices. Plaintiffs’argument is further undermined by the fact that SAMI worked closely with both the DOL and the DES throughout the recruitment process.
The DOL’s conclusion is further supported by the facts on the ground. For example, the district court concluded as a factual matter that none of the plaintiffs applied to work at White Wing from the 2003–04 season through the 2006–07 season, even though they all lived within the area in which the relevant work had been advertised via radio, newspaper, and the state job service. Moreover, the district court did not credit the testimony that the plaintiffs would have been willing to pay for their own daily commute from San Luis to White Wing—a 90mile commute that takes two to three hours to drive each way—and did credit testimony that some, if not all, workers recruited at San Luis would not live in housing at White Wing. In sum, the district court did not err in concluding that plaintiffs have not shown that SAMI failed to comply with the recruitment requirements, as “the job” it was offering was not the same one its San Luis employees had filled.
AFFIRMED.
4

 
 FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE December 19, 2007

Contact: Barb Howe, Farmworker Justice 202.293.5420 or bhowe@farmworkerjustice.org

US Farmworkers Displaced by Guestworkers Sue Employers for Discrimination, Violation of Worker Protection Laws
U.S. law requires growers to hire domestic farmworkers before relying on foreign farm labor

[Yuma, Arizona] Over two hundred US farmworkers who lost their jobs to foreign guestworkers filed suit today in US District Court in Arizona against their employers, for discrimination and violation of the Migrant and Seasonal Agricultural Worker Protection Act (AWPA). The farmworkers are represented by Farmworker Justice, a national litigation and advocacy organization based in Washington DC and Community Legal Services, a not-for-profit civil law firm in Arizona.

The lawsuit filed today alleges that in 2006, instead of rehiring from an existing labor pool of U.S. farmworkers, Servicios Agricolas Mex. Inc, an Arizona farm labor contractor, with the support of grower Marlin Ranching Company, requested permission to import 150 foreign guestworkers to harvest citrus crops. In its application to the U.S. government, the labor contractor contended that it could not find US workers to do the work.

“Most of our clients loyally worked for Servicios year after year,” states Pamela Bridge, an attorney at Community Legal Services. “They felt betrayed that their employer chose to hire guestworkers instead of themselves. These are low income US workers who counted on that employment for their families.”

To protect the wages and working conditions of the domestic agricultural workforce, federal law requires employers to extend a preference to qualified U.S. farmworkers before turning to foreign farm labor. The US farmworkers claim that the labor contractor failed to contact them at the beginning of the harvest season, as it had in all previous seasons, when it was not trying to import foreign labor. Having heard nothing about the upcoming season, workers approached the contractor directly and were told falsely, that no jobs were available.

In addition to violating the AWPA, several farmworkers who hold US citizenship claim discrimination, since the employers refused to recruit or re-hire them, favoring foreign workers., instead.

“This case addresses serious abuses in the H-2A foreign guestworker program,” said Marni Willenson, an attorney with Farmworker Justice. “Employers are not permitted to import foreign labor when US workers are available. The law is supposed to protect the rights of US workers, first Unfortunately, we have observed that this sort of displacement is becoming more common, because foreign labor is cheap and the Department of Labor will approve employer applications without any real scrutiny of the claim that US workers cannot be found.”

The workers are seeking back pay for lost wages and an injunction to prevent the employer from discriminating against US workers in their hiring practices.

###
For more information, contact Barb Howe, Communications Coordinator, Farmworker Justice. bhowe@farmworkerjustice.org or 202.293.5420 ext. 307.

 
 Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 1 of 81
U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Phoenix Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:07−cv−02581−GMS

CLOSED,STD

Murillo, et al v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. et al Assigned to: Judge G Murray Snow Case in other court: Ninth Circuit, 12−16272 Cause: 42:1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 12/19/2007 Date Terminated: 02/12/2014 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Juan Abarca Figueroa TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Marni Willenson , Farmworker Justice 4064 N Lincoln Ave Ste 359 Chicago, IL 60618 312−546−4137 Fax: 312−261−9977 Email: mwillenson@nclr.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge Community Legal Services P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, AZ 85036−1538 602−258−3434 Fax: 602−258−4628 Email: PBridge@clsaz.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , Farmworker Justice 1126 16th St NW Ste 270 Washington, DC 20036 202−293−5420 Fax: 202−293−5427 Email: vruiz@farmworkerjustice.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay Community Legal Services P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, AZ 85036−1538 602−258−3434 Fax: 602−253−1536 Email: GMcKay@clsaz.org ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Federico Aguilar Murillo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 2 of 81

Plaintiff Josefa Alvarez De Meza
Plaintiff Marcos Amezcua
Plaintiff Sergio Amezcua

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 3 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Pedro Angulo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Harold Appling

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Cesar Arce Insunza

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 4 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Arellano Juarez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gumercindo Arroyo Camacho

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Santiago Arzate Carrillo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 5 of 81

Plaintiff Armando Arzate−Carrillo
Plaintiff Alfredo Avalos Barron
Plaintiff Raul Avila Almanza
Plaintiff Trinidad Ayon Jusaino

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 6 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Jose Becerra TERMINATED: 01/15/2010

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ismael Becerra Perez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 7 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff David Beltran Miranda

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan Beltran Soto

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rafael Beltran−Nunez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 8 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jacobo Bobadilla German

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Botello−Avila

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Vicente Briceno Farias

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 9 of 81

Plaintiff Mario Bustos Cruz
Plaintiff Marco Antonio Cabrera−Garcia
Plaintiff Octavio Caldera

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 10 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Manuel Castillo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mario Castro Mora

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Florentino Castro Ramirez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 11 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Adelaido Castro Ruiz

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Cazares Aguilar

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Cervantes Gil

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 12 of 81

Plaintiff Jesus Cervantes−Sandoval
Plaintiff Jose Chavez Gomez TERMINATED: 08/05/2011
Plaintiff Rosario Chinchillas
Plaintiff Jose Contreras Moroyoqui

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 13 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Joaquin Cordova Martinez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Baldomero Corona Ruiz

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Cipriano Crispin Mendez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 14 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Josefina Cuara Aguilar

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jorge Delgado Marias

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 15 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Diego Delgado Torres

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Alejandro Duarte

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Fernando Duarte Ochoa

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 16 of 81

Plaintiff Francisco Duarte Rascon
Plaintiff Jesus Duran
Plaintiff Juan Escalante Carrillo

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 17 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Heriberto Espinoza Vargas

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Abraham Esquivel

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 18 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Sergio Felix Prado

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rosario Flores Oliverria

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Lucia Franco

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 19 of 81

Plaintiff Luciano Franco
Plaintiff Antonio Fuentez Zamudio
Plaintiff Raul Gamez Camacho
Plaintiff Guberto Garcia

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 20 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Raul Garcia

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Salvador Garcia

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Gaxiola

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 21 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Gaxiola

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rosa Gaxiola

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mauro German Sanchez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 22 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rafael Gil Soto

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Alfonso Gomez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Gomez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 23 of 81

Plaintiff Martin Gomez Alvarez
Plaintiff Genoveva Gonzalez
Plaintiff Gloria Gonzalez

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 24 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Maria Gonzalez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Saul Gonzalez de Leon

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 25 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Lorenzo Hernandez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 26 of 81

Plaintiff Tomas Hernandez
Plaintiff Jesus Hernandez Chavira
Plaintiff Mario Hernandez Hernandez
Plaintiff Sabas Hernandez Muniz

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 27 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Humberto Hernandez Sabori

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Hernandez Vazquez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ernesto Herrera Luna

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 28 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Magdaleno Isais Casa

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Ledesma

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Leon Torres

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 29 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Fernando Linares Sanchez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis Llamas Leon

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Martin Arturo Lopez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 30 of 81

Plaintiff Gamiel Lopez Espinoza
Plaintiff Lino Lopez Figueroa
Plaintiff Casimiro Lopez Medina

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 31 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Jose Lopez−Villegas TERMINATED: 08/09/2011

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Teodoro Loya Carrillo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Pedro Lubiano Cisneros

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 32 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ruben Luna Ramirez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Luque

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rito Luque Luque

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 33 of 81

Plaintiff Juan Luque Martinez
Plaintiff Abelino Macias Nunez
Plaintiff Antonio Magana Valdovinos
Plaintiff Sergio Magana Villicana

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 34 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Isidro Martinez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Olegario Martinez Carrillo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Maria Martinez Rosas

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 35 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Florentino Medina

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Trinidad Medina

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rey David Medina Bojorquez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 36 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Medina Uriarte

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Melendrez Prieto

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Antonio Mendoza Madrid

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 37 of 81

Plaintiff Hilario Mesa Sedano
Plaintiff Orne Mesa Felix
Plaintiff Julian Millan Rochin

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 38 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Maria Miranda

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Alberto Miranda Haros

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Miranda Haros

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 39 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Crisonogo Miranda Lopez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Austroheberto Miranda Miranda

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis Montanez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 40 of 81

Plaintiff Juan Morales Sanchez
Plaintiff Baltazar Moreno Jurado
Plaintiff Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez
Plaintiff Samuel Murillo Madrigal

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 41 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Navarrete Arambula

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Demetrio Nerez Pina

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gonzala Nunez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 42 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Nunez Avila

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Felix Nunez Rios

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 43 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ruben Olvera Gonzalez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Marco Pacheco Valdez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 44 of 81

Plaintiff Carlos Palacios
Plaintiff Enrique Paredes Ruiz
Plaintiff Emiliano Parra

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 45 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Martin Patino Juarez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Venancio Patino Ortega

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Armando Pena Quinonez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 46 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Penunuri

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Armando Pimienta

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rodrigo Placencia Contreras

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 47 of 81

Plaintiff Modesto Plasencia
Plaintiff Facundo Quinonez
Plaintiff Aurelio Quinonez Armenta
Plaintiff Juan Ramirez Garcia

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 48 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Antonio Ramirez Soto

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Luis Ramos

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Miguel Angel Rapan

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 49 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Salvador Raygoza

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Javier Rendon Aguilera

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Graciela Reyes Medina

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 50 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Modesto Reyes Zambrano

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Rodriguez Cervantes

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 51 of 81

Plaintiff Rey Rodriguez Palma
Plaintiff Miguel Rodriguez Ramirez
Plaintiff Ramon Rodriguez Rubio

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 52 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan Rodriguez−Orozco

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Florencio Rojo Pacheco

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis Rojo Pacheco

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 53 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Florencio Rojo Torres

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jaime Ruano−Lomeli

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Antonio Rubio

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 54 of 81

Plaintiff Francisco Saldana
Plaintiff Arturo Salgado Bahena
Plaintiff Ruben Sanchez
Plaintiff Juan Sanchez Huerta

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 55 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Miguel Sanchez Huerta

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Sanchez Salas

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Salvador Sanchez Solis

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 56 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Maria Sandoval Bojorquez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Martin Santos

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rosario Santos

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 57 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Uriel Santos

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Segura Sandoval

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Maria Sepulveda

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 58 of 81

Plaintiff Octavio Serrano
Plaintiff Gonzalo Tapia Haro
Plaintiff Salomon Tapia Haro

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 59 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Pablo Tirado Duran

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Toledo Garcia

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Julian Torres Corona

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 60 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Hermelinda Torres Herrera

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jorge Trejo Gonzalez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Valdez Acosta

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 61 of 81

Plaintiff Luis Valdez Duran
Plaintiff Victor Valenzuela
Plaintiff Miguel Valenzuela Gurrola
Plaintiff Guadalupe Valle Luque

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 62 of 81

Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Pedro Colino Vaquero

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gabriel Vargas Avila

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Vazquez Huerta

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 63 of 81

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Eleuterio Vega Gil

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Enrique Velarde Acosta

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Federico Velazquez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 64 of 81

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Vibriezca Ceja

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan Villa Parra

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Martin Villanueva

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 65 of 81

Plaintiff Victor Villanueva
Plaintiff Jose Villegas Garcia
Plaintiff Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 66 of 81

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Manuel Zamora Sanchez

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Vicente Zamudio Trujillo

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mario Zarate Godines

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 67 of 81

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gustavo Zerega Espinoza

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Amador Cervantes−Sandoval

represented by Marni Willenson , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz , (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Oscar Miranda Quiroz

represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson Farmworker Justice 4064 N Lincoln Ave Ste 359 Chicago, IL 60618 312−546−4137 Fax: 312−261−9977 Email: mwillenson@nclr.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz Farmworker Justice

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 68 of 81

1126 16th St NW Ste 270 Washington, DC 20036 202−293−5420 Fax: 202−293−5427 Email: vruiz@farmworkerjustice.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis Trejo−Lopez

represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated TERMINATED: 04/26/2012
Defendant Richard De Leon TERMINATED: 02/07/2014 doing business as Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos TERMINATED: 02/07/2014
Defendant Marlin Ranching Company TERMINATED: 04/26/2012
Defendant

represented by Tom Crowe Crowe & Scott PA 1100 E Washington St., Ste. 200 Phoenix, AZ 85034−1090 602−252−2570 Fax: 602−252−1939 Email: tom@crowescott.com
represented by Harold Edward Campbell , III Campbell & Coombs PC 1811 S Alma School Rd Ste 225 Mesa, AZ 85225 480−839−4828 Fax: 480−897−1461 Email: heciii@haroldcampbell.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Tom Crowe (See above for address)
represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 69 of 81

Marlin Growers Incorporated TERMINATED: 04/26/2012

represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Ralph De Leon TERMINATED: 04/13/2010

represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address)

Defendant
Servicios Agricola Mexicano TERMINATED: 04/13/2010

represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 12/19/2007

# Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 350.00, receipt number 09700000000001620862, filed by Juan Luque Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana Valdovinos, Sergio Magana Villicana, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Gumercindo Arroyo Camacho, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa Sedano, Orne Mesa Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda Lopez, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Luis Montanez, Juan Morales Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Armando Arzate−Carrillo, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Marco Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Martin Patino Juarez, Venancio Patino Ortega, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Juan Ramirez Garcia, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Jose Luis Ramos, Raul Avila Almanza, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Graciela Reyes Medina, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez Cervantes, Rey Rodriguez Palma, Miguel Rodriguez Ramirez, Ramon Rodriguez Rubio, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose Becerra, Miguel Sanchez Huerta, Jose Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Maria Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose Segura Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Ismael Becerra Perez, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda Torres Herrera, Jorge Trejo Gonzalez, Jose Valdez Acosta, Luis Valdez Duran, Victor Valenzuela, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Miguel Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose Vibriezca Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, David Beltran Miranda, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Mario Zarate Godines, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Richard De Leon, Juan Beltran Soto, Ralph d/b/a Servicio De Leon, Marlin Ranching Company, Rafael Beltran−Nunez, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marco Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes−Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario Chinchillas, Jose Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona Ruiz, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Cipriano Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Marcos Amezcua, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Sergio Amezcua, Raul Garcia, Salvador

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 70 of 81

12/19/2007 12/20/2007
01/07/2008 01/07/2008 01/08/2008 01/08/2008
01/29/2008 01/29/2008 01/29/2008 01/29/2008 02/26/2008 03/26/2008 04/24/2008 06/19/2008

Garcia, Jesus Gaxiola, Jose Gaxiola, Rosa Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Jose Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Pedro Angulo, Genoveva Gonzalez, Gloria Gonzalez, Maria Gonzalez, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus Hernandez Chavira, Harold Appling, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus Hernandez Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon Torres, Fernando Linares Sanchez, Luis Llamas Leon, Cesar Arce Insunza, Martin Arturo Lopez, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Lino Lopez Figueroa, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Teodoro Loya Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano Cisneros, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus Luque, Rito Luque Luque, Jose Arellano Juarez. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc, # 3 Summons Richard De Leon, # 4 Summons Ralph De Leon d/b/a Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos, # 5 Summons Marlin Ranching Company)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 12/19/2007)
This case has been assigned to the Honorable Earl H. Carroll. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CIV 07−2581−PHX−EHC. (Entered by CMH, ) (Entered: 12/20/2007)
2 Summons Issued as to Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Richard De Leon, Ralph De Leon, Marlin Ranching Company. (Attachments: # 1 Ralph De Leon, # 2 Richard De Leon, # 3 Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., # 4 Magistrate Judge Availability Form)(CMH, ). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 12/20/2007)
3 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Virginia Ruiz on behalf of all plaintiffs. (BAS, ) (Entered: 01/08/2008)
4 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Marni Willenson on behalf of all plaintiffs. (BAS, ) (Entered: 01/08/2008)
PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 200, receipt number PHX066414 as to Virginia Ruiz, Marni Willenson. (BAS, ) (Entered: 01/08/2008)
5 ORDER pursuant to General Order 05−25 granting 3 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice; granting 4 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 01/08/2008)
6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Marlin Ranching Company waiver sent on 1/24/2008. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 01/29/2008)
7 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Ralph De Leon waiver sent on 1/24/2008. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 01/29/2008)
8 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Richard De Leon waiver sent on 1/24/2008. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 01/29/2008)
9 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. waiver sent on 1/24/2008. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 01/29/2008)
10 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures by Juan Abarca Figueroa (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/26/2008)
11 ANSWER to 1 Complaint,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, by Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Richard De Leon, Ralph De Leon, Marlin Ranching Company.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 03/26/2008)
12 IT IS ORDERED setting a Scheduling Conference for 6/30/2008 at 03:00 PM before Judge Earl H. Carroll. Ordered by Judge Earl H. Carroll on 4/24/08. (BAH) (Entered: 04/24/2008)
13 REPORT re: Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Juan Abarca Figueroa. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/19/2008)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 71 of 81

06/30/2008
07/02/2008
07/25/2008 08/08/2008 08/18/2008 08/21/2008 08/28/2008

14 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Earl H. Carroll: Appearances: Pamela Bridge on behalf of plaintiffs. Tom Crowe on behalf of defendants. Scheduling Conference held on 6/30/2008. Order to issue setting forth case management deadlines. (Court Reporter Candy Potter.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAH) (Entered: 06/30/2008)
15 ORDER: Discovery due by 5/5/2009. Motions for Summary Judgment due by 4/24/2009. Joint Proposed Pretrial Order due by 8/25/2009. Bench Trial set for 9/22/2009 09:00 AM before Judge Earl H Carroll. Final Pretrial Conference set for 9/14/2009 02:00 PM before Judge Earl H Carroll. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 6/30/08. (REW, ) (Entered: 07/02/2008)
16 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Marlin Ranching Company. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/25/2008)
17 RESPONSE in Opposition re 16 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
18 REPLY in Support re 16 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Marlin Ranching Company. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/18/2008)
19 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' First Supplemental Disclosures by Juan Abarca Figueroa (McKay, George) (Entered: 08/21/2008)
20 STIPULATION to Consolidate Actions by Juan Luque Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana Valdovinos, Sergio Magana Villicana, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Gumercindo Arroyo Camacho, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa Sedano, Orne Mesa Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda Lopez, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Luis Montanez, Juan Morales Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Armando Arzate−Carrillo, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Marco Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Martin Patino Juarez, Venancio Patino Ortega, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Juan Ramirez Garcia, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Jose Luis Ramos, Raul Avila Almanza, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Graciela Reyes Medina, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez Cervantes, Rey Rodriguez Palma, Miguel Rodriguez Ramirez, Ramon Rodriguez Rubio, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose Becerra, Miguel Sanchez Huerta, Jose Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Maria Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose Segura Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Ismael Becerra Perez, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda Torres Herrera, Jorge Trejo Gonzalez, Jose Valdez Acosta, Luis Valdez Duran, Victor Valenzuela, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Miguel Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose Vibriezca Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, David Beltran Miranda, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Mario Zarate Godines, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Richard De Leon, Juan Beltran Soto, Ralph De Leon, Marlin Ranching Company, Amador Cervantes−Sandoval, Rafael Beltran−Nunez, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marco Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes−Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario Chinchillas, Jose Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona Ruiz, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Cipriano Crispin Mendez, Josefina

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 72 of 81

08/29/2008 08/29/2008 09/02/2008 09/04/2008
09/15/2008
09/15/2008 09/15/2008

Cuara Aguilar, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Marcos Amezcua, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Sergio Amezcua, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Jesus Gaxiola, Jose Gaxiola, Rosa Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Jose Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Pedro Angulo, Genoveva Gonzalez, Gloria Gonzalez, Maria Gonzalez, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus Hernandez Chavira, Harold Appling, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus Hernandez Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon Torres, Fernando Linares Sanchez, Luis Llamas Leon, Cesar Arce Insunza, Martin Arturo Lopez, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Lino Lopez Figueroa, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Teodoro Loya Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano Cisneros, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus Luque, Rito Luque Luque, Jose Arellano Juarez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/28/2008)
21 STIPULATION to Allow Plaintiffs to Amend Complaint (Parties) by Juan Abarca Figueroa. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Amended Complaint Strike/Underlined)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/29/2008)
22 LODGED Proposed re 21 STIPULATION First Amended Complaint for Declaratory & Injunctive Relief & Damages. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. (Bridge, Pamela) COVER SHEET IS MISSING, ATTORNEY NOTICED, NO FOLLOW UP REQUIRED. Modified on 9/2/2008 (ESL, ). (Entered: 08/29/2008)
23 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re 22 Lodged Proposed Document filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Description of deficiency: Cover sheet is missing. NO FOLLOW UP REQUIRED. See attached pdf for full details. (ESL) (Entered: 09/02/2008)
24 The court has ORDERED this case reassigned to Judge G. Murray Snow who is newly−appointed to the District of Arizona. The reassignment is effective September 8, 2008. Judge Snow's docket is created from cases randomly−drawn from other judges in the Phoenix Division. As a result of combining cases that have been calendared on the dockets other judges, Judge Snow may be required to make future scheduling adjustments in this case. If, however, the Court does not otherwise provide notice of a change in the date or time of a hearing currently scheduled by the Court to which this matter was previously assigned, the parties should appear in Judge Snow's court for the hearing as scheduled. Any case deadlines remain unaffected by this order. Cases that have previously been referred to Magistrate Judges remain assigned to the Magistrate Judge receiving the referral. Any hearings in such matters scheduled by the Magistrate Judge remain unaffected by this Order. In such cases the parties should appear before the Magistrate Judge as scheduled. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
25 ORDER pursuant to 20 Stipulation; the actions captioned Jimenez v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc, CV07−1492−PHX−GMS, and Figueroa v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc, CV07−2581−PHX−GMS, are consolidated for purposes of pretrial case management, including discovery, motions disclosures, and all other pretrial matters; the Scheduling Order in Figueroa 15 shall apply to both actions, with the exception of the bench trial scheduled in Jimenez for 6/23/09 is vacated, to be reset upon further order of the Court in consultation with the parties; the motion to consolidate 16 is granted insofar as it pertains to pretrial case management; trial consolidation is an issue to be revisited as discovery progresses. Signed by G Murray Snow on 9/15/08. (REW, ) (Entered: 09/15/2008)
26 ORDER granting 21 Stipulation to Allow Plaintiffs to Amend their Complaint; the Clerk is directed to file the 22 lodged proposed amended complaint. Signed by G Murray Snow on 9/15/08. (REW, ) (Entered: 09/15/2008)
27 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages, filed by all Plaintiffs; Plaintiffs Oscar Miranda Quiroz and Luis

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 73 of 81

09/22/2008 10/13/2008 10/17/2008 10/17/2008 10/17/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008 12/02/2008 02/03/2009 02/05/2009
07/21/2009 07/22/2009
10/04/2010
10/05/2010 06/30/2011

Trejo−Lopez and Defendant Marlin Growers Inc added.(REW, ) Modified on 9/15/2008 (REW, ). (Entered: 09/15/2008)
28 Summons Issued as to Marlin Growers Inc. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 09/22/2008)
29 ANSWER to Complaint (First Amended) by Ralph De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Richard De Leon, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Growers Inc.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 10/13/2008)
30 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' First Request for Admissions to Defendants Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. & Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos by Juan Abarca Figueroa (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 10/17/2008)
31 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' First Set of Non−Uniform Interrogatories to Defendants Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos & Marlin Ranching Company by Juan Abarca Figueroa (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 10/17/2008)
32 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' First Request for Production of Documents to Defendants Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos & Marlin Ranching Company by Juan Abarca Figueroa (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 10/17/2008)
33 Notice re Service by Marlin Ranching Company (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 11/19/2008)
34 Notice re Service by Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 11/19/2008)
35 Notice re Service by Servicios Agricola Mexicano (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 11/19/2008)
36 NOTICE of Deposition of Leobardo Aguirre, filed by all plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 12/02/2008)
37 STIPULATION to Amend Scheduling Order by Juan Abarca Figueroa. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/03/2009)
38 CONSOLIDATION ORDER − MEMBER CASE. Directing the Clerk of the Court to consolidate Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, et al. v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., et al., No. CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS and Juan Abarca Figueroa, et al. v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., et al., No. CV−07−2581−PHX−GMS, with Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, et al. v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., et al., No. CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS as the lead case for purposes of pretrial case management. FURTHER ORDERED directing the parties to use the above caption and to file all future pleadings under the lead case. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/5/09. (KMG) (Entered: 02/05/2009)
39 ANSWER to Complaint (Second Amended) by Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Richard De Leon, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Growers Inc, Ralph De Leon, Servicios Agricola Mexicano.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/21/2009)
40 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re 39 Answer to Complaint filed by Marlin Ranching Company, Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. Description of deficiency: Document entered in wrong case. Document entered in consolidated case rather than lead case. (KMG) (Entered: 07/22/2009)
41 AMENDED COMPLAINT Fourth Amended Complaint as to CV07−02581 against All Defendants, filed by Federico Aguilar Murillo.(Bridge, Pamela) CORRECTION: Document entered in wrong case. Modified on 10/5/2010 (ESL). (Entered: 10/04/2010)
42 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re 41 Amended Complaint filed by Federico Aguilar Murillo. Description of deficiency: document entered in wrong case. See attached pdf for complete details) (ESL) (Entered: 10/05/2010)
43 ORDER that Jimenez v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS is dismissed with prejudice. Directing the Clerk of the Court to unconsolidate Jimenez v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS and Figueroa v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No.

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 74 of 81

07/01/2011 07/07/2011 07/22/2011 08/04/2011 08/05/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011 08/08/2011
08/09/2011 08/10/2011 08/10/2011

CV−07−2581−PHX−GMS. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any hearings and/or deadlines set in the consolidated cases will remain the same in the ongoing Figueroa v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−2581−PHX−GMS. The parties are directed to file any further pleadings in the Figueroa case under the appropriate case number. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 06/30/11. (ESL) (Entered: 06/30/2011)
44 *NOTICE of Correction re 41 Amended Complaint by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) *Modified on 7/5/2011 to add document 41. (ESL). (Entered: 07/01/2011)
45 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Federico Aguilar Murillo. Plaintiffs' Amendments Concerning Witnesses in the Proposed Final Pretrial Order. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 07/07/2011)
Minute Order: A Telephonic Status Conference is set for 8/8/2011 at 3:30 p.m. before Judge G Murray Snow. Counsel are directed to call (602) 322−7650. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.(ADG) (Entered: 07/22/2011)
46 STIPULATION to Dismiss Jose M. Chavez Gomez by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/04/2011)
47 ORDER that pursuant to the parties' 46 Stipulation, Jose M. Chavez Gomez is dismissed from this matter. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 08/05/11. (ESL) (Entered: 08/05/2011)
48 Proposed Pretrial Order Final (Joint) by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2011)
49 Proposed Findings of Fact by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/08/2011)
50 STIPULATION to Dismiss Jose Lopez Villegas by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/08/2011)
51 STIPULATION to Bifurcate Issues of Liability and Damages by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/08/2011)
52 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT and Conclusions of Law (Amended) by Plaintiff Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 1−2)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2011)
53 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G. Murray Snow: Telephonic Status Conference held on 8/8/2011. Appearances: Pamela Bridge for plaintiffs, Tom Crowe for defendants. Length of trial and other pretrial matters are discussed. The Court will determine the time limits and deadlines for trial and inform the parties at the Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/12/2011. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (JIR) (Entered: 08/09/2011)
54 ORDER Pursuant to the parties' 50 Stipulation; it is hereby ordered that Jose Lopez−Villegas is dismissed from this matter. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 08/09/11. (ESL) (Entered: 08/09/2011)
55 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Federico Aguilar Murillo. Amendment to 51 Stipulation to Bifurcate Liability and Damages. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/10/2011)
56 * Errata Regarding Statutory Citations by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) Modified on 8/11/2011 (LAD). * Incorrect event selected. Docket text modified from Notice to Errata. (Entered: 08/10/2011)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 75 of 81

08/10/2011 08/11/2011 08/12/2011 08/12/2011
08/17/2011 08/17/2011 08/17/2011 08/17/2011 08/18/2011 08/18/2011 08/19/2011 08/23/2011
08/23/2011
08/23/2011
08/24/2011 08/24/2011

57 Proposed Findings of Fact by Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/10/2011)
58 NOTICE re Plaintiffs' Notice Regarding Statutory Citations by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/11/2011)
59 STIPULATION to Amend Complaint by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Fourth Amended Complaint (Strike/Underlined), # 3 Exhibit Fifth Amended Complaint)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/12/2011)
60 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow. Telephonic appearances: Pamela Bridge for plaintiffs. Tom Crowe for defendants. Final Pretrial Conference held on 8/12/2011. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) (Entered: 08/15/2011)
61 NOTICE re Notice to Court Reporter by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/17/2011)
62 STIPULATION re 48 Proposed Pretrial Order to Amend Proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Amended Proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/17/2011)
63 TRIAL BRIEF by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/17/2011)
64 TRIAL BRIEF by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/17/2011)
65 ORDER granting the 62 Stipulation to Amend Proposed Joint Final Pretrial Order. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 08/18/11. (ESL) (Entered: 08/18/2011)
66 Additional Attachments to Main Document re 64 Trial Brief (Attachment A) by Plaintiff Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/18/2011)
67 ORDER denying the 55 Stipulation to Bifurcate Liability and Damages. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 08/19/11. (ESL) (Entered: 08/19/2011)
68 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Bench Trial (Day 1) begun on 8/23/2011. Bench Trial to reconvene on 8/25/2011 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(CLB) Modified on 8/24/2011 (CLB). (Entered: 08/24/2011)
69 AMENDED Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Amending the Bench Trial (Day 1) begun on 8/23/2011. Reason for Amendment: to reflect the trial will reconvene on 8/24/2011. Bench Trial (Day 1) begun on 8/23/2011. Bench Trial to reconvene on 8/24/2011 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(CLB) (Entered: 08/24/2011)
73 SECOND AMENDED Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Amending the Bench Trial (Day 1) begun on 8/23/2011. Reason for Amendment: to reflect the correct case number. Bench Trial (Day 1) begun on 8/23/2011. Bench Trial to reconvene on 8/24/2011 at 08:00 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(CLB) (Entered: 08/25/2011)
70 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Bench Trial (Day 2) held on 8/24/2011. Bench Trial to reconvene on 8/25/2011 at 08:30 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(CLB) (Entered: 08/24/2011)
71 *MEMORANDUM Regarding Stipulation re Joint Employer by Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) *Entry modified from "motion" on 8/25/2011 (ESL). (Entered: 08/24/2011)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 76 of 81

08/25/2011 08/25/2011
08/25/2011 08/29/2011 08/29/2011 08/30/2011 08/30/2011 08/31/2011 08/31/2011 09/01/2011 09/01/2011
09/02/2011 09/02/2011 09/02/2011 09/02/2011 09/02/2011 09/09/2011 09/09/2011 09/13/2011 03/06/2012

72 FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 08/25/11. (note: see attached pdf for complete details)(ESL) (Entered: 08/25/2011)
74 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Bench Trial (Day 3) held on 8/25/2011. Evidence and testimony presented. Bench Trial continued to 8:30 a.m., 8/30/2011, in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(TLB) (Entered: 08/25/2011)
75 STIPULATION to Add Plaintiff by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/25/2011)
76 MOTION to Add Witnesses by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/29/2011)
77 RESPONSE to Motion re 76 MOTION to Add Witnesses filed by Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/29/2011)
78 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Federico Aguilar Murillo. Amendment to 48 Proposed Pretrial Order Amended Depositions to be Offered. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
79 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Bench Trial (Day 4) held on 8/30/2011. Motion to Add Witness 76 is granted. Trial will reconvene on 8/31/2011 at 8:30 a.m. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(KFZ) (Entered: 08/30/2011)
80 ORDER denying the 59 Stipulation to Amend Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting the 75 Stipulation to Add Plaintiff. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 08/31/11. (ESL) (Entered: 08/31/2011)
81 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Bench Trial (Day 5) held on 8/31/2011. Trial will reconvene on 9/1/2011 at 8:30 a.m. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(KFZ) (Entered: 08/31/2011)
82 ORAL MOTION for Judgment as a Matter of Law by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company nad Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (MAW) (Entered: 09/01/2011)
83 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Bench Trial [Day 6] held on 9/1/2011. IT IS ORDERED taking under advisement 82 Defendants' oral Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law [see minute entry for full details]. Trial continued to 9/2/2011. (Court Reporter Gary Moll)(MAW) (Entered: 09/01/2011)
84 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow: Bench Trial DAY 7 completed on 9/2/2011. Matter taken under advisement. Order to issue. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.)(TCA) (Entered: 09/02/2011)
85 Witness List by Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (TLJ) (Entered: 09/06/2011)
86 *Witness List (titled Exhibit List) as to Plaintiffs.(TLJ) *Modified to reflect Witness List on 9/6/2011 (TLJ).* (Entered: 09/06/2011)
87 Exhibit List as to Plaintiffs.(TLJ) (Entered: 09/06/2011)
88 Exhibit List as to Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated.(TLJ) (Entered: 09/06/2011)
89 TRIAL BRIEF (Post Trial) by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 09/09/2011)
90 TRIAL BRIEF Plaintiffs' (Post Trial) Closing Brief by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A−C)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 09/09/2011)
91 OBJECTION re 90 Trial Brief Objection to Appendix "B" by Defendants Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 09/13/2011)
92 NOTICE OF FILING BANKRUPTCY Upon the Record (Notice of Automatic Stay) by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 03/06/2012)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 77 of 81

03/27/2012
04/02/2012 04/05/2012

93 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW − The Court awards $500 in statutory damages to Raul Garcia, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Alberto Miranda Haros, Antonio Fuentes, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Guadualupe Espinoza, Jorge Delgado, Juan Rodriguez Orosco, and Raul Garcia Almeida. The Court awards $250 to Gustava Zerega Espinoza, Carlos Manuel Palacios Torres, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jose Botillo Avila, Pedro Angulo, Saul Gonzales, Marcos Amezcua, Teodoro Loya Carillo. The Court awards $150 to Javier Rendon Aguilera, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Graciela Reyes Medina, Jesus Antonio Penunuri, Jose Contreras, Jose Sepulveda, and Trinidad Medina. No other Plaintiffs are awarded relief on any of their other claims. A form Judgment Order shall be lodged with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 03/27/12. (Note: see attached PDF for complete details) (ESL) (Entered: 03/27/2012)
94 NOTICE re Lodging Proposed form of Judgment by Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated . (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Judgment in a Civil Action)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/02/2012)
95 OBJECTION Plaintiffs' Objection to Defendant's 94 Form of Judgment by Plaintiffs Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Marcos Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Harold Appling, Cesar Arce Insunza, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo Camacho, Martin Arturo Lopez, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Armando Arzate−Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran Miranda, Juan Beltran Soto, Rafael Beltran−Nunez, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marco Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Cervantes−Sandoval, Jesus Cervantes−Sandoval, Rosario Chinchillas, Jose Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona Ruiz, Cipriano Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Jesus Gaxiola, Jose Gaxiola, Rosa Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Jose Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Genoveva Gonzalez, Gloria Gonzalez, Maria Gonzalez, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus Hernandez Chavira, Sabas Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus Hernandez Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon Torres, Fernando Linares Sanchez, Luis Llamas Leon, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Lino Lopez Figueroa, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Teodoro Loya Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano Cisneros, Jose Luis Ramos, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus Luque, Rito Luque Luque, Juan Luque Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana Valdovinos, Sergio Magana Villicana, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Orne Mesa Felix, Hilario Mesa Sedano, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda Lopez, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Luis Montanez, Juan Morales Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Marco Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Martin Patino Juarez, Venancio Patino Ortega, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Juan Ramirez Garcia, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Graciela Reyes Medina, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez Cervantes, Rey Rodriguez Palma, Miguel Rodriguez Ramirez, Ramon Rodriguez Rubio, Juan

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 78 of 81

04/12/2012 04/17/2012 04/26/2012
04/26/2012 05/12/2012 05/17/2012 05/17/2012 05/21/2012 05/22/2012

Rodriguez−Orozco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Miguel Sanchez Huerta, Jose Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Jose Segura Sandoval, Maria Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda Torres Herrera, Jorge Trejo Gonzalez, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Jose Valdez Acosta, Luis Valdez Duran, Victor Valenzuela, Miguel Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose Vibriezca Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Mario Zarate Godines, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Bridge, Pamela) Modified on 4/6/2012 (ESL). (Entered: 04/05/2012)
96 REPLY re 94 Notice (Other) in Support of Proposed Form of Judgment Awarding Costs by Defendants Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/12/2012)
97 ORDER re 92 Notice of Automatic Stay. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED directing counsel for Defendants Richard and Victoria Deleon to file a Status Report on June 4, 2012, and every 90 days thereafter until the stay has been lifted. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 4/17/12. (LAD) (Entered: 04/17/2012)
98 JUDGMENT ORDER, as there is no just reason for delay pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P 54(b), Judgment is entered in favor of the following Plaintiffs and against Defendants pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1832 (c) and 1854(c)(1) for statutory damages in the following amounts: (A) $500 to (1) Raul Garcia, (2) Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, (3) Fernando Duarte Ochoa, (4) Alberto Miranda Haros, (5) Antonio Fuentes, (6) Francisco Duarte Rascon, (7) Guadualupe Espinoza, (8) Jorge Delgado, (9) Juan Rodriguez Orosco, and (10) Raul Garcia Almeida; (B) $250 to (1) Gustava Zerega Espinoza, (2) Carlos Manuel Palacios Torres, (3) Rafael Beltran Nunez, (4) Alfredo Avalos Barron, (5) Jesus Medina Uriarte, (6) Jose Botillo Avila, (7) Pedro Angulo, (8) Saul Gonzales, (9) Marcos Amezcua, (10) Teodoro Loya Carillo and (C) $150 to (1) Javier Rendon Aguilera, (2) Francisco Cervantes Gil, (3) Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, (4) Graciela Reyes Medina, (5) Jesus Antonio Penunuri, (6) Jose Contreras, (7) Jose Sepulveda, and (8) Trinidad Medina plus post−judgment interest at the rate of.18 percent per annum; Judgment is entered in favor of all Defendants with the exception of Richard DeLeon and against Plaintiffs for all other claims set forth in Plaintiffs Fifth Amended Complaint; Each party shall bear their own costs in this matter. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 4/26/12. (REW) (Entered: 04/26/2012)
99 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/26/2012)
100 NOTICE re Plaintiffs' Notice Concerning Defendants' Motion for Attorney Fees by Federico Aguilar Murillo . (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/12/2012)
101 REPLY to Response to Motion re 99 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/17/2012)
102 ORDER: Status Conference set for 6/1/2012 at 02:45 PM in Courtroom 501, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 5/17/12. (SJF) (Entered: 05/17/2012)
103 MOTION to Continue Status Conference by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/21/2012)
104 Counsel having filed a motion to continue and there being no objection, IT IS ORDERED the 103 Motion to Continue filed by Federico Aguilar Murillo is GRANTED and the Status Conference, presently set for 6/1/12 at 2:45 p.m. is VACATED and RESET. Status Conference set for 6/21/12 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow.

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 79 of 81

05/22/2012 05/25/2012 05/25/2012 05/31/2012 06/01/2012 06/01/2012 06/01/2012 06/01/2012 06/04/2012 06/06/2012 06/20/2012
06/20/2012
06/20/2012
06/20/2012

Ordered by Judge G Murray Snow.(ADG)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
105 MOTION to Strike 99 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/22/2012)
106 NOTICE OF APPEAL to 9th Circuit, as to 98 Judgment, by Federico Aguilar Murillo. Filing fee received: $ 455.00, receipt number 0970−6816678. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/25/2012)
107 Representation Statement by Federico Aguilar Murillo re 106 Notice of Appeal Representation Statement on Behalf of Plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/25/2012)
108 Ninth Circuit Case Number 12−16272 for 106 Notice of Appeal. (KMG) (Entered: 05/31/2012)
109 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Federico Aguilar Murillo for proceedings held on 8/23/11−8/25/11 & 8/30/11−9/2/11 before Judge Honorable Snow, (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
110 NOTICE re Notice of Ordering Partial Transcript by Federico Aguilar Murillo re 109 Transcript Request − Appeal . (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
111 STIPULATION to Extend Time by Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
112 RESPONSE to Motion re 105 MOTION to Strike 99 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/01/2012)
113 ORDER pursuant to 111 Stipulation: ORDERED that Defendants shall file their Memorandum in support of their Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 99), if any, on or before July 6, 2012. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/4/12. (SJF) (Entered: 06/04/2012)
114 REPLY to Response to Motion re 105 MOTION to Strike 99 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/06/2012)
115 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT of Bench Trial Day 1 (Opening Statements Omitted) for dates of 8/23/2011, before Judge G. Murray Snow, re 106 Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter Gary Moll. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/11/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/18/2012. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
116 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Bench Trial Day 2 for dates of 8/24/2011, before Judge G. Murray Snow, re 106 Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter Gary Moll. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/11/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/18/2012. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
117 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Bency Trial Day 3 for dates of 8/25/2011, before Judge G. Murray Snow, re 106 Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter Gary Moll. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/11/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/18/2012. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
118 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT Bench Trial Day 4 for dates of 8/30/2011, before Judge G. Murray Snow, re 106 Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter Gary Moll. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 80 of 81

06/20/2012
06/20/2012
06/20/2012
06/21/2012
06/21/2012 06/25/2012 06/27/2012 07/09/2012 10/03/2012 10/10/2012 01/08/2013 04/08/2013 07/08/2013 10/14/2013

through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/11/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/18/2012. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
119 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Bench Trial Day 5 for dates of 8/31/2011, before Judge G. Murray Snow, re 106 Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter Gary Moll. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/11/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/18/2012. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
120 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of Bench Trial Day 6 for dates of 9/1/2011, before Judge G. Murray Snow, re 106 Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter Gary Moll. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/11/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/18/2012. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
121 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL PARTIAL TRANSCRIPT of Bench Trial Day 7 (Closing Arguments Omitted) for dates of 9/2/2011, before Judge G. Murray Snow, re 106 Notice of Appeal. Court Reporter Gary Moll. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/11/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/23/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/18/2012. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
122 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow. Appearances: Pamela Bridge and George McKay for plaintiffs. Tom Crowe for defendants. Status Conference held on 6/21/2012. IT IS ORDERED denying 99 Motion for Attorney Fees. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying 105 Motion to Strike. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
123 CERTIFICATE OF RECORD TRANSMITTED TO 9TH CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS re 106 Notice of Appeal. (VAR) (Entered: 06/21/2012)
124 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated for proceedings held on August 23, August 24, August 25, August 30, August 31, September 1, 2011 before Judge Snow.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/25/2012)
125 STATUS REPORT of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 06/27/2012)
126 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/09/2012)
127 ORDER directing counsel for Defendants Richard and Victoria Deleon to file a Status Report on or before 10/10/12,and every 90 days thereafter until the stay has been lifted. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/3/12. (TLJ) (Entered: 10/03/2012)
128 STATUS REPORT of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 10/10/2012)
129 STATUS REPORT by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 01/08/2013)
130 STATUS REPORT of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 04/08/2013)
131 STATUS REPORT of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 07/08/2013)
132 STATUS REPORT of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 10/14/2013)

Case: 2:07-cv-2581 As of: 03/13/2018 07:50 PM MST 81 of 81

01/17/2014 01/23/2014
02/05/2014 02/07/2014 03/06/2015

133 STATUS REPORT of Chapter 13 Bankruptcy by Richard De Leon. (Campbell, Harold) (Entered: 01/17/2014)
134 ORDER, directing the parties to inform the Court by 2/5/14, if their appeal includes the DeLeons, and if not, if there is any reason why the Court cannot dismiss Plaintiffs' claims against the DeLeons without prejudice. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/22/14. (REW) (Entered: 01/23/2014)
135 MOTION to Dismiss Party Richard DeLeon Stipulated Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Richard DeLeon by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/05/2014)
136 ORDER granting the 135 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss Party; the Clerk is directed to dismiss without prejudice Richard DeLeon from this action. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/7/14.(REW) (Entered: 02/07/2014)
137 MANDATE of USCA, affirming the decision of the District Court, re: 12−16272 106 Notice of Appeal. (Attachments: # 1 Order, # 2 Memorandum, # 3 NDA) (copies sent by the Ninth Circuit)(REW) (Entered: 03/06/2015)

 
 Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 1 of 114

U.S. District Court DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Phoenix Division) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:07−cv−01492−GMS

CLOSED,STD

Jimenez et al v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., et al Assigned to: Judge G Murray Snow Cause: 29:1801 Farmworker Rights
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 08/02/2007 Date Terminated: 06/30/2011 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 710 Labor: Fair Standards Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez

represented by Joshua Karsh Hughes Socol Piers Resnick &Dym Ltd 70 W Madison St Ste 4000 Chicago, IL 60602 312−604−2630 Fax: 312−604−2631 Email: jkarsh@hsplegal.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson Farmworker Justice 4064 N Lincoln Ave Ste 359 Chicago, IL 60618 312−546−4137 Fax: 312−261−9977 Email: mwillenson@nclr.org TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz Farmworker Justice 1126 16th St NW Ste 270 Washington, DC 20036 202−293−5420 Fax: 202−293−5427 Email: vruiz@farmworkerjustice.org TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay Community Legal Services P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, AZ 85036−1538 602−258−3434 Fax: 602−253−1536 Email: GMcKay@clsaz.org ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge Community Legal Services P.O. Box 21538 Phoenix, AZ 85036−1538 602−258−3434 Fax: 602−258−4628 Email: PBridge@clsaz.org

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 2 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Lorenzo Hernandez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Tomas Hernandez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Jesus J Hernandez Chavira TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 3 of 114

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mario Hernandez Hernandez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Sabas J Hernandez Muniz

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 4 of 114

Plaintiff Humberto Hernandez Sabori
Plaintiff Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010
Plaintiff Ernesto Herrera−Luna

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 5 of 114

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Magdaleno Isais Casa

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Ledesma

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 6 of 114

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Leon−Torres

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Fernando Linares−Sanchez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis M Llamas Leon

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 7 of 114

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Martin Arturo Lopez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Gamaniel Lopez Espinoza TERMINATED: 10/04/2010 also known as Gamiel Lopez Espinoza TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 8 of 114

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Casimiro Lopez Medina

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Lino J Lopez−Figueroa

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 9 of 114

Plaintiff Teodoro Loya−Carrillo

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ruben Luna Ramirez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 10 of 114

Plaintiff Jesus G Luque
Plaintiff Rito Luque Luque

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 11 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Juan F Luque−Martinez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Abelino Macias Nunez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Antonio Magana TERMINATED: 10/04/2010 also known as Antonio Magana Valdovinos TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 12 of 114

TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Sergio Magana Villicana

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Isidro Martinez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 13 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Olegario Martinez Carrillo TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Maria R Martinez Rosas TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Trinidad Medina

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 14 of 114

Plaintiff Florentiono Medina also known as Florentino Medina
Plaintiff Rey David Medina Bojorquez

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 15 of 114

Plaintiff Jesus Medina Uriarte
Plaintiff Jesus Melendrez Prieto
Plaintiff Antonio Mendoza Madrid

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 16 of 114

Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Hilario Mesa−Sedano

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Orne Meza−Felix

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 17 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Julian Millan Rochin

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Maria A Miranda

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 18 of 114

Plaintiff Jesus A Miranda Haros
Plaintiff Austroheberto Miranda Miranda
Plaintiff Alberto Miranda Haros

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 19 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Carlos Monroy−Vega TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 20 of 114

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis A Montanez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Juan Morales−Sanchez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Baltazar Moreno Jurado

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 21 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Samuel Murillo Madrigal TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Navarrete Arambula

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 22 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Demetrio Nerez Pina

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gonzala Nunez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Nunez Avila

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 23 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Felix Nunez−Rios

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 24 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Ruben Olvera Gonzalez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 25 of 114

Marco A Pacheco Valdez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Carlos Palacios

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Enrique Paredes Ruiz

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 26 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Emiliano Parra

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Venancio Patino Ortega TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 27 of 114

Plaintiff Martin Patino−Juarez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010
Plaintiff Armando Pena Quinonez
Plaintiff Jesus Penunuri

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 28 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Armando B Pimienta

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rodrigo Placencia Contreras

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 29 of 114

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Modesto Plasencia

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Facundo Quinonez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Aurelio Quinonez Armenta

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 30 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Antonio Ramirez Soto

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan M Ramirez−Garcia

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 31 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Luis Ramos

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Miguel Angel Rapan

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Salvador Raygoza

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 32 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Javier Rendon Aguilera

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Modesto Reyes Zambrano TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 33 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Graciela Reyes−Medina

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 34 of 114

Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan Rodriguez−Orozco

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Rey A Rodriguez−Palma TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 35 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis Rojo Pacheco

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 36 of 114

Plaintiff Florencio Rojo Pacheco
Plaintiff Florencio Rojo Torres
Plaintiff Antonio Rubio

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 37 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Francisco Saldana TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Arturo Salgado Bahena

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 38 of 114

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Ruben Sanchez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan Sanchez Huerta

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose L Sanchez Salas

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 39 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Salvador Sanchez Solis TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Miguel Sanchez−Huerta

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 40 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Uriel Santos

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Martin Santos

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 41 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rosario M Santos

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose M Segura−Sandoval

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 42 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Maria Sepulveda

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Octavio Serrano

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 43 of 114

Gonzalo Tapia Haro

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Salomon Tapia Haro TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Toledo Garcia

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 44 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Pablo Tirado Duran TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Julian Torres Corona

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 45 of 114

Plaintiff Hermelinda C Torres Herrera
Plaintiff Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez
Plaintiff Luis F Valdez Duran

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 46 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Valdez−Acosta

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Victor M Valenzuela

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 47 of 114

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Guadalupe Valle Luque

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Pedro Colino Vaquero

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 48 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gabriel Vargas Avila

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Vazquez Huerta

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 49 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Eleuterio Vega Gil

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Enrique Velarde Acosta

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Federico Velazquez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 50 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Martin Villanueva TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 51 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Victor Villanueva

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan Villa Parra

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 52 of 114

Jose Villegas Garcia

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Manuel Zamora Sanchez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 53 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Vicente Zamudio Trujillo

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Mario Zarate Godinez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010 also known as Mario Zarate Godines TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 54 of 114

Plaintiff Gustavo Zerega Espinoza
Plaintiff Juan Abarca Figueroa TERMINATED: 10/04/2010
Plaintiff Federico Aguilar Murillo

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 55 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Josefa Alvarez De Meza

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Sergio Amezcua

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 56 of 114

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Marcos Amezcua

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Pedro Angulo

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Harold Appling

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 57 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Cesar Arce Insunza

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Arellano Juarez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 58 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Armando Arzate−Carrillo

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Santiago Arzate Carrillo

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 59 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Alfredo Avalos Barron

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Raul Avila Almanza

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 60 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Trinidad Ayon Jusaino TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Jose F Becerra TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 61 of 114

Ismael Becerra Perez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff David Beltran Miranda

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 62 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rafael Beltran Nunez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan F Beltran Soto

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 63 of 114

Plaintiff Jacobo Bobadilla German
Plaintiff Jose Botello−Avila
Plaintiff Vicente Briceno Farias

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 64 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mario Bustos Cruz

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Octavio Caldera

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 65 of 114

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Manuel Castillo TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mario Castro Mora

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Florentino Castro Ramirez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 66 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Adelaido Castro Ruiz

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose R Cazares Aguilar

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 67 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Cervantes Gil

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus Cervantes Sandoval

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 68 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Chavez Gomez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rosario E Chinchillas

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 69 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Joaquin Cordova Martinez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 70 of 114

Baldomero Corona−Ruiz

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Cipriano J Crispin Mendez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Josefina Cuara Aguilar

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 71 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Toledo De La Rosa TERMINATED: 11/24/2008

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jorge Delgado Marias

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 72 of 114

Plaintiff Diego Delgado−Torres
Plaintiff Alejandro Duarte
Plaintiff Fernando Duarte Ochoa

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 73 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Francisco Duarte Rascon

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Jesus E Duran TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 74 of 114

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Juan Escalante Carrillo

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Heriberto Espinoza Vargas

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 75 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Abraham Esquivel

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Sergio Felix−Prado

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 76 of 114

(See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Rosario Flores Oliverria TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Lucia Franco

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luciano Franco

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 77 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Antonio Fuentez Zamudio

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Raul Gamez−Camacho TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 78 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Raul Garcia

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Salvador Garcia TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Guberto Garcia TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 79 of 114

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose G Gaxiola

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jesus M Gaxiola

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 80 of 114

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rosa A Gaxiola

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mauro German Sanchez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Rafael Gil Soto

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 81 of 114

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Martin Gomez Alvarez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Alfonso Gomez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 82 of 114

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Genoveva M Gonzalez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Maria I Gonzalez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 83 of 114

Plaintiff Gloria E Gonzalez

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Saul Gonzalez de Leon

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza

represented by Joshua Karsh (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 84 of 114

Plaintiff Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia
Plaintiff Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez TERMINATED: 10/04/2010
Plaintiff Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joshua Karsh (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joshua Karsh (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 85 of 114

George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Joshua Karsh (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez

represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Joshua Karsh (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jaime Ruano−Lomeli

represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Joshua Karsh (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 86 of 114

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Luis Trejo−Lopez

represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Joshua Karsh (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Consol Plaintiff Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo TERMINATED: 10/04/2010
Consol Plaintiff Jose Lopez−Villegas

represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 87 of 114

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Consol Plaintiff Oscar Miranda Quiroz

represented by George Holl McKay (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Marni Willenson (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Pamela Marie Bridge (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Virginia E Ruiz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/08/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant Richard De Leon doing business as Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos
Defendant Sara De Leon TERMINATED: 01/11/2011
Defendant Marlin Ranching Incorporated
Defendant Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated
Defendant Ralph De Leon
Defendant Marlin Growers Incorporated

represented by Tom Crowe Crowe &Scott PA 1100 E Washington St Ste 200 Phoenix, AZ 85034−1090 602−252−2570 Fax: 602−252−1939 Email: tom@crowescott.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 88 of 114

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Servicios Agricola Mexicano TERMINATED: 04/22/2010

represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant Marlin Ranching Company

represented by Tom Crowe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 08/02/2007
08/02/2007 08/03/2007 08/03/2007 08/03/2007 08/03/2007 08/03/2007 08/03/2007 08/03/2007 08/06/2007 08/06/2007

# Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT. Filing fee received: $ 350.00, receipt number 1373497, filed by Jose R Casarez Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Peregrino De La Rosa, Toledo De La Rosa, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix−Prado, Rosario Flores Olivera, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentes Zamudio, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Guberto Garcia, Jose G Gaxiola, Jesus M Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Jose C Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon, Sara De Leon, Richard De Leon. (Attachments: # 1)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/02/2007)
This case has been assigned to the Honorable Earl H. Carroll. All future pleadings or documents should bear the correct case number: CV 07−1492−PHX−EHC. (Entered by REK) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
2 Notice re Magistrate Consent Form (REK) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
3 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCY re 1 Complaint,,,, filed by all plaintiffs. Description of deficiency: Incorrect Parties added to case. The following required documents were not attached: Summonses. (REK) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
4 Notice re Summons for Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc by Juan Abarca Figueroa re 1 Complaint,,,, (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
5 Notice re Summons for Ralph De Leon by Juan Abarca Figueroa re 1 Complaint,,,, (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
6 Notice re Summons for Sara De Leon by Juan Abarca Figueroa re 1 Complaint,,,, (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
7 Notice re Summons for Richard De Leon d/b/a Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos by Juan Abarca Figueroa re 1 Complaint,,,, (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
8 Notice re Summons for Marlin Ranching, Inc. by Juan Abarca Figueroa re 1 Complaint,,,, (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/03/2007)
9 Summons Issued as to Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 08/06/2007)
10 Summons Issued as to Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 08/06/2007)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 89 of 114

08/06/2007 08/06/2007 08/06/2007 08/06/2007
08/08/2007 09/05/2007 09/05/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007 10/24/2007 11/08/2007 11/09/2007 12/06/2007 12/10/2007 01/28/2008 02/26/2008 03/05/2008 03/14/2008 03/24/2008
03/24/2008

11 Summons Issued as to Sara De Leon. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 08/06/2007)
12 Summons Issued as to Richard De Leon. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 08/06/2007)
13 Summons Issued as to Ralph De Leon. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 08/06/2007)
14 Summons Issued as to Marlin Ranching, Inc.. (REK). *** IMPORTANT: You must select "Document and stamps" or "Document and comments" on the print screen in order for the court seal to appear on the summons you print. (Entered: 08/06/2007)
15 AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. (Attachments: # 1 Underlined Complaint)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2007)
16 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Marlin Ranching, Inc. waiver sent on 8/9/2007. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 09/05/2007)
17 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. waiver sent on 8/9/2007. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 09/05/2007)
18 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. served on 9/13/2007. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 09/19/2007)
19 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. served on 9/13/2007. (Same PDF as doc #18) (SAT) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
20 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Richard De Leon waiver sent on 10/4/2007. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 10/24/2007)
21 SUMMONS Returned Executed (certificate of service) as to Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. served on 8/30/2007. (TLJ) (Entered: 11/09/2007)
22 ANSWER to Amended Complaint by Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 11/09/2007)
23 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Juan Abarca Figueroa. Ralph De Leon waiver sent on 10/4/2007. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 12/06/2007)
24 ANSWER to 15 Amended Complaint by Ralph De Leon.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 12/10/2007)
25 IT IS ORDERED setting a Scheduling Conference for Monday, 3/24/2008 at 02:30 PM before Judge Earl H. Carroll. Signed by Judge Earl H. Carroll on 1/28/08. (BAH) (Entered: 01/28/2008)
26 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/26/2008)
27 Notice re Service of Initial Disclsoures by Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 03/05/2008)
28 REPORT re: Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/14/2008)
29 Minute Entry. Proceedings held before Judge Earl H. Carroll: Appearances: Pamela Bridge on behalf of plaintiffs', Tom Crowe on behalf of defendants'.Scheduling Conference held on 3/24/08. Order to follow setting forth case management deadlines.(Court Reporter Candy Potter.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (BAH) (Entered: 03/24/2008)
30 Notice re Notice of Service of First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/24/2008)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 90 of 114

03/24/2008 04/04/2008
04/10/2008 04/10/2008 04/10/2008
05/16/2008 07/25/2008 08/08/2008 08/08/2008
08/08/2008
08/08/2008
08/18/2008 08/20/2008 08/25/2008 08/28/2008 09/04/2008

31 Notice re Notice of Service of Request for Production to Defendants by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/24/2008)
32 ORDER: Discovery due by 3/3/2009. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 6/1/2009. Bench Trial set for 6/23/2009 09:00 AM before Judge Earl H Carroll. Final Pretrial Conference set for 6/15/2009 02:00 PM before Judge Earl H Carroll. Signed by Judge Earl H Carroll on 4/4/08. (TLJ) (Entered: 04/04/2008)
33 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice as to attorney Joshua Karsh on behalf of the plaintiffs. (BAS, ) (Entered: 04/10/2008)
PRO HAC VICE FEE PAID. $ 100, receipt number PHX069911 as to Joshua Karsh. (BAS, ) (Entered: 04/10/2008)
34 ORDER pursuant to General Order 05−25 granting 33 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice.Per the Court's Administrative Policies and Procedures Manual, applicant has five (5) days in which to register as a user of the Electronic Filing System. Registration to be accomplished via the court's website at www.azd.uscourts.gov. (BAS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 04/10/2008)
35 Notice re Service of Responses to Discovery Requests by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Marlin Ranching Company (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/16/2008)
36 MOTION to Consolidate Cases by Marlin Ranching Company. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/25/2008)
37 RESPONSE in Opposition re 36 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
38 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. Amendment to 32 Scheduling Order, Plaintiffs' First Motion to Amend Scheduling Order to Allow Plaintiffs To Add Parties. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
39 MOTION to Amend/Correct re Plaintiffs' 1st Motion to Amend Complaint &Join Parties by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A−B, # 2 Exhibit Amended Complaint (Strike/Underlined), # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
40 LODGED Proposed First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages re: 39 MOTION to Amend/Correct re Plaintiffs' 1st Motion to Amend Complaint &Join Parties. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
41 REPLY in Support re 36 MOTION to Consolidate Cases filed by Marlin Ranching Company. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/18/2008)
42 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' First Supplemental Disclosures by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/20/2008)
43 RESPONSE to Motion re 39 MOTION to Amend/Correct re Plaintiffs' 1st Motion to Amend Complaint &Join Parties filed by Marlin Ranching Company. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/25/2008)
44 STIPULATION to Consolidate Actions by all parties. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) Docket text modified on 9/23/2008: individual filer names removed. (APJ, ). (Entered: 08/28/2008)
45 The court has ORDERED this case reassigned to Judge G. Murray Snow who is newly−appointed to the District of Arizona. The reassignment is effective September 8, 2008. Judge Snow's docket is created from cases randomly−drawn from other judges in the Phoenix Division. As a result of combining cases that have been calendared on the dockets other judges, Judge Snow may be required to make future scheduling adjustments in this case. If, however, the Court does not otherwise provide notice of a change in the date or time of a hearing currently scheduled by the Court to which this matter was previously assigned, the parties

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 91 of 114

09/15/2008
10/02/2008
10/21/2008 11/24/2008 11/24/2008 12/02/2008 12/18/2008 02/03/2009 02/05/2009
02/06/2009 02/09/2009

should appear in Judge Snow's court for the hearing as scheduled. Any case deadlines remain unaffected by this order. Cases that have previously been referred to Magistrate Judges remain assigned to the Magistrate Judge receiving the referral. Any hearings in such matters scheduled by the Magistrate Judge remain unaffected by this Order. In such cases the parties should appear before the Magistrate Judge as scheduled. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (REK) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
46 ORDER that the actions captioned Jimenez, et al. v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., et al. CV07−1492−PHX−GMS and Figueroa, et al. v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., et al. CV07−2581−PHX−GMS are consolidated for purposes of pretrial case management, including discovery, motions disclosures, and all other pretrial matters. That the Scheduling Order entered by this Court in Figueroa (dkt. #15) shall apply to both actions, with the exception of the bench trial schedule in Jimenez for 06/23/09. The bench trial in Jimenez set for 06/23/09 is vacated, to be reset upon further order of the Court. That the 36 Motion to Consolidate is granted insofar as it pertains to pretrial case management; trial consolidation is an issue to be revisted as discovery progresses. Signed by G Murray Snow on 09/15/08. (ESL) (Entered: 09/15/2008)
47 ORDER granting 39 Motion to Amend/Correct. The Court has read Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and the Defendant's Response 43 . In their Response Defendants do not oppose Plaintiff's Motion, but note that Plaintiff need not have filed a motion, or made other allegations, to obtain the relief they seek. Because Defendants do not contest the motion It is ordered granting the Plaintiffs' First Motion To Amend Complaint and Join Parties.. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on October 2, 2008.(GMS, )(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no.pdf document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 10/02/2008)
48 Notice re Service by Marlin Ranching Company (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 10/21/2008)
49 ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to file the 40 LODGED First Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/24/08. (ESL) (Entered: 11/24/2008)
50 AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Plaintiffs(ESL) (Entered: 11/25/2008)
51 NOTICE of Deposition of Leobardo Aguirre, filed by all plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 12/02/2008)
52 ANSWER to 50 Amended Complaint (Second) by Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Growers Inc, Richard De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 12/18/2008)
53 STIPULATION to Amend Scheduling Order by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/03/2009)
54 CONSOLIDATION ORDER − LEAD CASE; directing the Clerk to consolidate CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS and CV−07−2581−PHX−GMS, with CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS as the lead case for purposes of pretrial case management; directing the parties to use the caption on this order and to file all future pleadings under the lead case. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/5/09. (REW, ) (Entered: 02/05/2009)
55 ORDER granting the 53 Stipulation to Amend Scheduling Order; Plaintiffs will have until 3/3/09 to disclose their expert witnesses and reports; Defendants will have until 4/7/09 to disclose their expert witnesses and reports; and the parties have until 5/5/09 to disclose rebuttal experts. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/5/09. (REW, ) (Entered: 02/06/2009)
56 MOTION to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order and Request for Status Conference by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 02/09/2009)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 92 of 114

02/09/2009 02/10/2009
02/11/2009 02/11/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 02/18/2009 02/18/2009 02/19/2009 02/23/2009 02/23/2009 02/23/2009 02/26/2009 03/03/2009
03/04/2009

57 Notice re Notice of Service of Responses of Defendants' First Set of Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/09/2009)
58 NOTICE TO PARTY OF DEFICIENCY RE CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT: Pursuant to FRCiv 7.1 and LRCiv 7.1.1 the attached Corporate Disclosure Statement form must be filed by all nongovernmental corporate parties with their first appearance. A supplemental statement must be filed upon any change in the information. In addition, if not already filed, the Corporate Disclosure Statement should be filed within 15 days. Corporate Disclosure Statement Deadline set for 2/25/2009 as to Marlin Ranching, Inc., Marlin Growers, Inc., Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., and Servicios Agricola Mexicano. (KFZ) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
59 ORDER granting 56 Motion (Request) for a Status Conference. ORDERED setting a status conference on 2/19/09 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/10/2009.(LAD) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
60 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
61 NOTICE of Deposition of Humberto Gaxiola, filed by all plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
62 NOTICE of Deposition of Jose Ramon Castano, filed by all plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
63 MOTION to Vacate and Reset Status Conference by Marcos Amezcua, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 02/18/2009)
64 ORDER granting 63 Motion to Vacate, vacating the Status Conference set for 2/19/09 and resetting same for 2/27/09 at 10:30. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/18/09.(LSP) (Entered: 02/18/2009)
65 ORDER Status Conference re−set for 3/3/2009 02:00 PM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/19/09. (LSP) (Entered: 02/19/2009)
66 Notice re Notice of Service of Notice of Deposition by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez Nohemi Marquez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/23/2009)
67 Notice re Notice of Service of Notice of Deposition by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez Jose Ramon Castano (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/23/2009)
68 Notice re Notice of Service of Notice of Deposition by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez Humberto Gaxiola (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/23/2009)
69 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct re Scheduling Order Concerning Expert Deadline by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/26/2009)
70 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow. Appearances: Marni Willenson (telephonically), Pamela Bridge, and George McKay for plaintiffs. Tom Crowe for defendants. Status Conference held on 3/3/2009. Discussion held re extending disclosure deadlines. Order to follow. (Court Reporter Patricia Lyons.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) (Entered: 03/03/2009)
71 AMENDED CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER Over the next sixty days the Plas and Dfts will: (a) identify the separate work crews on which each of the Plas participated; (b) determine whether they can stipulate, based on Dfts records, to the hours worked by each Pla for the relevant periods at issue under the claims and if they cannot so stipulate the reasons for this inability; (c) determine other damages issues which may be amenable to categorical stipulation; and (d) identify whether

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 93 of 114

03/12/2009 03/19/2009

the provided interrogatory responses are sufficient or whether some or all of the remaining Plas must respond to the interrogatories. The parties will have an additional sixty days after May 5, 2009 to complete discovery, including any necessary depositions of Plas based on the forthcoming interrogatory responses. The deadline for completing factual discovery will be July 6, 2009. Dispositive or partially dispositive motions shall be filed no later than November 23, 2009. The Final Pretrial Conference scheduled for September 14, 2009, and the bench trial set for September 22, 2009 in Figueroa v. Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Case No. 07cv2581 are VACATED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion 56 to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order, and Second Motion 69 to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order are moot. Discovery due by 7/6/2009. Dispositive motions due by 11/23/2009. Telephone Conference set for 5/5/2009 03:00 PM before Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/4/09. (KMG, ) (Entered: 03/04/2009)
72 ORDER − Upon the Court's consideration of a letter dated 3/11/09 from Dfts' cnsl, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plas shall hand−deliver and/or fax a copy of their full and complete expert disclosures to Dfts on 8/6/09, so that Dfts will have five (5) days in which to evaluate and determine whether or not Dfts wish to file a Daubert challenge. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/12/09. (see order for details) (SAT) (Entered: 03/12/2009)
73 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDER FORM by Rosario M Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Pablo Tirado Duran, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Juan Villa Parra, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Sergio Amezcua, Marcos Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Harold Appling, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Cesar Arce Insunza, Francisco Ledesma, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Francisco Leon−Torres, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Luis M Llamas Leon, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Martin Arturo Lopez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Jorge Delgado Marias, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Sergio Felix−Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Guberto Garcia, Jose G Gaxiola, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Jesus M Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Jesus G Luque, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Rito Luque Luque, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Trinidad Medina, Florentino Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 94 of 114

03/20/2009
03/23/2009 03/26/2009
03/26/2009 04/01/2009 04/08/2009 04/08/2009 04/08/2009 04/21/2009 04/22/2009 05/04/2009

Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Tomas Hernandez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando B Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Antonio Rubio, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Uriel Santos, Martin Santos, Humberto Hernandez Sabori for proceedings held on March 3, 2009 before Judge G. Murray Snow. (Karsh, Joshua) (Entered: 03/19/2009)
74 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDER FORM by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon for proceedings held on 03/03/2009 before Judge Snow. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 03/20/2009)
75 Notice re Service of Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Marlin Ranching Company on Four Plaintiffs (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 03/23/2009)
76 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: Status Hearing held on 3/3/09 before Judge G Murray Snow. Court Reporter: Patricia Lyons. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 4/16/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/27/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/24/2009. (BAS, ) (Entered: 03/26/2009)
77 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT (BAS, ) (Entered: 03/26/2009)
78 Notice re Service by Marcos Amezcua, Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/01/2009)
79 NOTICE of Deposition of Oscar Arguayo Jr, filed by all plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/08/2009)
80 NOTICE of Deposition of Oscar Arguayo Sr, filed by all plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/08/2009)
81 NOTICE of Deposition of Salvador Covarrubias, filed by all plaintiffs. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/08/2009)
82 NOTICE of Deposition of Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos, Marlin Ranching, Marlin Growers, filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/21/2009)
83 AMENDED DOCUMENT by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. Amendment to 82 Notice of Deposition Plaintiffs' Amended Notice of Deposition of Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc. &Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/22/2009)
84 Exhibit List in Support of Defendants' Memorandum in Supplement to Joint Status Report by Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc...

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 95 of 114

05/04/2009

(Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/04/2009)
85 JOINT STATEMENT re Joint Report by Rosario M Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Pablo Tirado Duran, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Juan Villa Parra, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Sergio Amezcua, Marcos Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Harold Appling, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Cesar Arce Insunza, Francisco Ledesma, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Marlin Growers Inc, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Francisco Leon−Torres, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Luis M Llamas Leon, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Martin Arturo Lopez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Sergio Felix−Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Guberto Garcia, Jose G Gaxiola, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Jesus M Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Jesus G Luque, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Rito Luque Luque, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Trinidad Medina, Florentino Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Tomas Hernandez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Armando B Pimienta, Ralph De Leon, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Antonio Rubio,

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 96 of 114

05/04/2009 05/04/2009 05/05/2009 05/05/2009
05/08/2009 05/22/2009 05/26/2009
05/26/2009 05/27/2009 05/27/2009

Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Uriel Santos, Martin Santos, Humberto Hernandez Sabori. (Crowe, Tom) Modified on 5/6/2009 (LAD). INCORRECT EVENT SELECTED. THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN MODIFIED FROM STIPULATION TO JOINT STATEMENT. (Entered: 05/04/2009)
86 MEMORANDUM re: Plaintiffs' Supplemental Memorandum to the Joint Status Report re 85 Stipulation,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, by Plaintiffs Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/04/2009)
87 MEMORANDUM re: Supplement to Joint Status Report by Defendants Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/04/2009)
88 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow. Appearances: Pamela Bridge and George McKay for plaintiffs. Tom Crowe for defendants. Discovery Hearing held on 5/5/2009. Order to follow. (Court Reporter Linda Schroeder.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) (Entered: 05/05/2009)
89 ORDER The Court met with the parties today concerning Plaintiffs' request for limitations on discovery. After discussion with the parties it is ordered that fifty Plaintiffs who will be randomly determined by the parties will respond to the interrogatories that were served on Plaintiffs by Defendants last October. The parties will determine a method for randomly selecting Plaintiffs with representative Plaintiffs coming from each work crew. Such Plaintiffs will be designated by Friday May 8. The designated Plaintiffs will provide full and complete responses to the interrogatories on or before May 26, 2009. It is further ordered that if on or before May 12, Plaintiffs can demonstrate to Defendants how they intend to establish liability for and prove the amounts on all of their damages claims on a work crew by work crew basis that will not give rise to possible individidual variations among plaintiffs for purposes of either damages or liability, then such discovery will not be necessary. If Plaintiffs do make such disclosure to Defendants and the parties cannot agree as to whether the individual discovery responses remain necessary, the parties may seek a telephonic conference with the Court to determine the issue. Ordered by Judge G Murray Snow on May 5, 2009. This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (GMS, ) (Entered: 05/05/2009)
90 Notice re Compliance with court order by Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/08/2009)
91 Notice re Notice to the Court by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/22/2009)
92 MOTION to Dismiss Party by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) Modified on 5/26/2009 (DMT, ).***PER 129 ORDER DATED 06/30/09 PLAINTIFF NO. 26 (JUAN M. RAMIREZ−GARCIA) LISTED ON EXHIBIT A IS STRICKEN*** DOCUMENT NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH LRCiv 7.1(c). ATTORNEY NOTICED. Modified on 6/30/2009 (ESL). (Entered: 05/26/2009)
93 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants First Set on Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/26/2009)
94 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants First Set of Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
95 MOTION to Dismiss Party For Failure to Comply with Court Order by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 97 of 114

05/29/2009 06/02/2009 06/02/2009

De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/27/2009)
96 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants First Set on Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 05/29/2009)
97 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants First Set of Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/02/2009)
98 STIPULATION Regarding Time for Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss by Rosario M Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Pablo Tirado Duran, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Juan Villa Parra, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Sergio Amezcua, Marcos Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Harold Appling, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Cesar Arce Insunza, Francisco Ledesma, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Marlin Growers Inc, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Francisco Leon−Torres, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Luis M Llamas Leon, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Martin Arturo Lopez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Sergio Felix−Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Guberto Garcia, Jose G Gaxiola, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Jesus M Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Jesus G Luque, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Rito Luque Luque, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Trinidad Medina, Florentino Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Tomas Hernandez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 98 of 114

06/03/2009
06/03/2009
06/04/2009
06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009 06/05/2009

Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Armando B Pimienta, Ralph De Leon, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Antonio Rubio, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Uriel Santos, Martin Santos, Humberto Hernandez Sabori. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/02/2009)
99 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDER FORM by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon for proceedings held on 05/05/2009 before Judge Snow. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/03/2009)
100 MOTION to Amend/Correct re Amend Exhibit "A" to Motion to Dismiss by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/03/2009)
101 ORDER pursuant to 98 Stipulation, Plaintiffs may file their responsive pleading to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 92 , which the parties have agreed is a motion for partial summary judgment, on or before 6/25/09. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/4/09. (TLJ) (Entered: 06/04/2009)
102 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants First Set of Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
103 Notice re Service of Request for Admissions by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
104 NOTICE of Deposition of Antonio Mendoza Madrid, filed by Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
105 NOTICE of Deposition of Felix Nunez Rios, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
106 NOTICE of Deposition of Francisco Duarte Rascon, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
107 NOTICE of Deposition of Gumercindo Arroyo, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
108 NOTICE of Deposition of Fernando Linares, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
109 NOTICE of Deposition of Fernando Duarte Ochoa, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
110 NOTICE of Deposition of Miguel A. Rapan, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
111 NOTICE of Deposition of Baltazar Moreno Jurado, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
112 NOTICE of Deposition of Uriel Santos, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)
113 NOTICE of Deposition of Cipriano Crispin, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/05/2009)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 99 of 114

06/09/2009 06/09/2009 06/12/2009
06/12/2009 06/12/2009 06/15/2009 06/15/2009 06/15/2009 06/17/2009 06/17/2009 06/18/2009
06/26/2009 06/26/2009 06/26/2009 06/26/2009 06/30/2009

114 STIPULATION Regarding Time for Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Court Order (First Request) by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
115 TRANSCRIPT DESIGNATION AND ORDER FORM by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez for proceedings held on 05/05/2009 before Judge Snow. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/09/2009)
116 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings re: Discovery Dispute Hearing held on 5/5/09 before Judge G Murray Snow. Court Reporter: Linda Schroeder. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/6/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 7/13/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/10/2009. (BAS, ) (Entered: 06/12/2009)
117 NOTICE OF FILING OF OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT 116 (BAS, ) (Entered: 06/12/2009)
118 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Interrogatories by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/12/2009)
119 ORDER granting 114 Stipulation: extending the time in which Plaintiffs may respond to 95 Defendants' motion to dismiss to and including June 19, 2009. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/12/09. (LSP) (Entered: 06/15/2009)
120 NOTICE of Deposition of Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos, filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/15/2009)
121 NOTICE of Deposition of Marling Ranching, Inc. &Marlin Growers, Inc., filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/15/2009)
122 MOTION to Withdraw Motion to Dismiss for Failure to Comply with Court Order by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
123 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Interrogatories by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/17/2009)
124 ORDER granting 122 Defendants' Motion to Withdraw, 95 Defendants' MOTION to Dismiss For Failure to Comply with Court Order without prejudice to Defendants bringing any related discovery motions in the future as may be appropriate. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/18/09.(LSP) (Entered: 06/18/2009)
125 NOTICE of Deposition of Jose Gonzalez, filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/26/2009)
126 NOTICE of Deposition of Julio De La Rocha, filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/26/2009)
127 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Interrogatories by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/26/2009)
128 STIPULATION Regarding Time for Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (First Request) by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/26/2009)
129 ORDER granting Dft's 100 Motion to Amend Exhibit "A" to Motion to Dismiss. That Plaintiff No. 26 (Juan M. Ramirez−Garcia) listed on Exhibit A of the Motion to Dismiss is stricken. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 06/30/09.(ESL) (Entered: 06/30/2009)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 100 of 114

06/30/2009 07/02/2009

130 ORDER granting the parties 128 Stipulation, extending the time in which Plas may file their response to Dfts' 92 Motion to Dismiss, to and including 07/21/09. No further extensions will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 06/30/09. (ESL) (Entered: 06/30/2009)
131 STIPULATION Regarding Time for Compliance With Discovery Deadlines by Rosario M Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Pablo Tirado Duran, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Juan Villa Parra, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Sergio Amezcua, Marcos Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Harold Appling, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Cesar Arce Insunza, Francisco Ledesma, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Marlin Growers Inc, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Francisco Leon−Torres, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Luis M Llamas Leon, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Martin Arturo Lopez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Sergio Felix−Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Guberto Garcia, Jose G Gaxiola, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Jesus M Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Jesus G Luque, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Rito Luque Luque, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Trinidad Medina, Florentino Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Tomas Hernandez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Armando B Pimienta, Ralph De Leon, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 101 of 114

07/02/2009 07/02/2009
07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009 07/02/2009
07/06/2009 07/06/2009 07/07/2009
07/08/2009
07/08/2009 07/09/2009 07/16/2009 07/16/2009 07/21/2009

Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Antonio Rubio, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Uriel Santos, Martin Santos, Humberto Hernandez Sabori. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Order Granting Stipulation)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
132 NOTICE of Deposition of Antonio Mendoza Madrid, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
133 STIPULATION to Allow Plaintiffs to Amend First Amended Complaint on Case No. CV07−02581 PHX−GMS by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 First Amended Complaint (Strike/Underline))(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
134 NOTICE of Deposition of Francisco Duarte Rascon, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
135 NOTICE of Deposition of Fernando Duarte Ochoa, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
136 NOTICE of Deposition of Miguel A. Rapan, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
137 NOTICE of Deposition of Baltazar Moreno Jurado, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
138 LODGED Proposed re 133 Stipulation Second Amended Compaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief and Damages. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 07/02/2009)
139 Notice re Notice of Unavailability for Deposition by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/06/2009)
140 Notice re Withdrawal of Notice of Unavailability by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/06/2009)
141 ORDER pursuant to 131 Stipulation, that Plaintiffs may file their responses to Defendants' outstanding request for admissions served on July 5, 2009 103 and the interrogatories on which the parties have agreed on or before July 31, 2009. Discovery due by 9/11/2009. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/7/09. (DMT, ) (Entered: 07/07/2009)
142 ORDER granting 133 Stipulation to Allow Plaintiffs to Amend First Amended Complaint on Case No. CV07−02581−PHX−GMS and directing theClerk of the Court to file the lodged Second Amended Complaint 138 . Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/7/09. (DMT, ) (Entered: 07/08/2009)
143 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by all plaintiffs.(as to member case CV 07−2581−PHX−GMS)(DMT, ) (Entered: 07/08/2009)
144 NOTICE of Deposition of Uriel Santos, filed by all defendants. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/09/2009)
145 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Second Production Request to Defendants by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 07/16/2009)
146 Notice re Service by Marlin Ranching Company (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/16/2009)
147 STIPULATION STIPULATION REGARDING DISMISSAL OF CERTAIN PLAINTIFFS AND WITHDRAWAL OF DEFENDANTS' PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS by Rosario M Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda,

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 102 of 114
Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Pablo Tirado Duran, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Juan Villa Parra, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Sergio Amezcua, Marcos Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Harold Appling, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Cesar Arce Insunza, Francisco Ledesma, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Marlin Growers Inc, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Francisco Leon−Torres, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Luis M Llamas Leon, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Martin Arturo Lopez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Sergio Felix−Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Guberto Garcia, Jose G Gaxiola, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Jesus M Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Jesus G Luque, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Rito Luque Luque, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Trinidad Medina, Florentino Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Tomas Hernandez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Armando B Pimienta, Ralph De Leon, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Antonio Rubio, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Uriel Santos, Martin Santos, Humberto Hernandez Sabori. (Karsh, Joshua) (Entered: 07/21/2009)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 103 of 114

07/22/2009

148 Notice re PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SERVICE RE: PLAINTIFFS' REQUEST FOR ADMISSIONS TO DEFENDANTS WILLIAM CHANEY, MARLIN RANCHING AND MARLIN GROWERS by Rosario M Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Pablo Tirado Duran, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Juan Villa Parra, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza, Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Sergio Amezcua, Marcos Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Harold Appling, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Cesar Arce Insunza, Francisco Ledesma, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, Francisco Leon−Torres, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Luis M Llamas Leon, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Martin Arturo Lopez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Sergio Felix−Prado, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Guberto Garcia, Jose G Gaxiola, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Jesus M Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Alfonso Gomez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Jesus G Luque, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Rito Luque Luque, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Trinidad Medina, Florentino Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Tomas Hernandez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando B Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Antonio Rubio, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Uriel Santos, Martin Santos, Humberto Hernandez Sabori

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 104 of 114

07/22/2009 07/27/2009
07/29/2009 08/05/2009 08/05/2009 08/05/2009 08/11/2009
08/21/2009 08/26/2009 09/04/2009 09/11/2009

(Karsh, Joshua) (Entered: 07/22/2009)
149 ANSWER to 143 Amended Complaint (Second) by Marlin Growers Inc, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Marlin Ranching Company, Richard De Leon, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Ralph De Leon.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 07/22/2009)
150 ORDER pursuant to 147 Stipulation, ORDERED withdrawing and terminating dfts' motion to dismiss 92 . FURTHER ORDERED the parties will file a notice with the Court on 8/20/09 indicating whether any of the plas listed in the parties' stipulation should not be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 7/27/2009. (LAD) (Entered: 07/27/2009)
151 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Interrogatories by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 07/29/2009)
152 Notice re Notice of Service of Report of Plaintiffs' Expert Jorge Rivero by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/05/2009)
153 Notice re Notice of Service of Report of Plaintiffs' Expert Dr. J.E. Taylor by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/05/2009)
154 Notice re Notice of Service of Subpoena of William S. Marrs by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/05/2009)
155 OBJECTION to Plaintiffs' Expert Witnesses by Defendants Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 08/11/2009)
156 RESPONSE re 155 Objection, Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants Preliminary Objections to Plaintiffs' Expert Witness by Plaintiffs Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
157 ORDER granting 147 Stipulation, dismissing Plaintiffs listed in the Stipulation with prejudice, see Stipulations for details. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 8/26/09. (LSP) (Entered: 08/26/2009)
158 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants Request for Production and Non−Uniform Interrogatories by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 09/04/2009)
159 Notice re Notice of Service of Plaintiffs' Supplemental Interrogatory Responses Concerning Damages by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Marcos Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Harold Appling, Cesar Arce Insunza, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix−Prado, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Jesus M Gaxiola, Jose G Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Saul Gonzalez de Leon,

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 105 of 114

09/21/2009 09/30/2009

Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon−Torres, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Luis M Llamas Leon, Martin Arturo Lopez, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus G Luque, Rito Luque Luque, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando B Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario M Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 09/11/2009)
160 MOTION for Extension of Time Deadlines Set Forth in Amended Case Management Order by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 09/21/2009)
161 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Marcos Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Harold Appling, Cesar Arce Insunza, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Armando Arzate Carrillo, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 106 of 114

10/01/2009
10/08/2009 10/09/2009

Felix−Prado, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Jesus M Gaxiola, Jose G Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon−Torres, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Luis M Llamas Leon, Martin Arturo Lopez, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus G Luque, Rito Luque Luque, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando B Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario M Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Willenson, Marni) (Entered: 09/30/2009)
162 ORDER granting the 160 Motion to Extend Deadlines Set Forth in Amended Case Management Order, it is hereby ordered amended the Amended Case Management Order as follows: Rebuttal expert disclosures shall occur on 10/22/09; Expert depositions shall be completed by 11/23/09; and Deadline for filing of deposition motions shall be 12/23/09. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/01/09. (ESL) (Entered: 10/01/2009)
163 ORDER granting 161 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorneys Virginia E Ruiz and Marni Willenson allowed to withdraw as counsel for Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/8/09.(REW, ) (Entered: 10/08/2009)
164 AMENDED ORDER re 162 Order; granting Defendants' 160 MOTION to Extend Deadlines Set Forth in Amended Case Management Order and amending the Amended Case Management Order 71 as follows: Rebuttal expert disclosures shall occur on 10/22/09; Expert depositions shall be completed by 11/23/09; and Deadline for filing of dispositive motions shall be 12/23/09. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/8/09. (REW, ) (Entered: 10/09/2009)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 107 of 114

12/02/2009 12/04/2009 12/04/2009
12/09/2009 01/04/2010 01/11/2010 01/15/2010
02/09/2010 02/10/2010 02/17/2010 02/18/2010
02/19/2010 02/19/2010 02/19/2010 02/19/2010

165 MOTION to Dismiss Party Jose F. Becerra by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 12/02/2009)
166 NOTICE of Deposition of Antonio Mendoza Madrid, filed by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 12/04/2009)
167 MOTION for Extension of Time For Completion of Expert Depositions and Filing Dispositive Motions by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 12/04/2009)
168 ORDER granting 167 Motion for Extension of Time. All expert depositions shall be completed on or before 1/15/10. All dispositive motions due by 2/12/2010. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/9/2009.(LAD) (Entered: 12/09/2009)
169 ORDER that Plaintiffs shall file and serve an answering memorandum to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss before 5:00 p.m. on 1/18/10 re 165 . Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/4/10. (TLJ) (Entered: 01/04/2010)
170 STIPULATION Motion to Dismiss Jose F. Becerra by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 01/11/2010)
171 ORDER; pursuant to the 170 Stipulated Motion to Dismiss, Jose F Becerra is dismissed without prejudice from this action, each party to bear their own costs concerning Jose F Becerra; directing the Clerk to terminate Defendants' 165 Motion to Dismiss Jose F Becerra as moot. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/14/10.(REW, ) (Entered: 01/15/2010)
172 STIPULATION Parties Stipulated Motion for Brief Extension for Deadlines for Dispositive Motions by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
173 ORDER pursuant to 172 Stipulation: Dispositive motions due by 2/19/2010. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/10/10. (DTN) (Entered: 02/10/2010)
174 MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/17/2010)
175 AMENDED MOTION for Leave to Exceed Page Limit by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Motion for Leave to Exceed Page Limit (Strike/Unerlined), # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) Modified on 2/18/2010, INCORRECT EVENT TYPE SELECTED. THIS ENTRY HAS BEEN MODIFIED "Motion to Amend/Correct" TO "Amended Motion for Leave to File", (LSP). (Entered: 02/18/2010)
176 ORDER granting the Plas' 175 Motion for Leave to File a 28 page dispositive motion. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/19/10.(KMG) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
177 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Ralph De Leon, Servicios Agricola Mexicano. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
178 STATEMENT of Separate Statement of Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment re 177 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Defendants Ralph De Leon, Servicios Agricola Mexicano. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit, # 2 Affidavit)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
179 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 02/19/2010)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 108 of 114

02/19/2010 02/19/2010 02/19/2010 02/19/2010
03/03/2010 03/03/2010 03/03/2010 03/18/2010

180 STATEMENT of Separate Statement of Facts in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment re 179 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Defendants Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
181 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
182 MEMORANDUM re: Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Partial Summary Judgment re 181 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Plaintiffs Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
183 STATEMENT of Plaintiffs' LRCIV56.1 Statement of Material Facts Relied on for Partial Summary Judgment re 181 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment by Plaintiffs Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1−4, # 2 Exhibit 5−6, # 3 Exhibit 7−8(1), # 4 Exhibit 8(2), # 5 Exhibit 9−12, # 6 Exhibit 13−23, # 7 Exhibit 24−34)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 02/19/2010)
184 MOTION to Amend/Correct re Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaints by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Figueroa − Second Amended Complaint (Strike/Underlined), # 2 Exhibit Jimenez − First Amended Complaint (Strike/Underlined), # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
185 LODGED Proposed Third Amended Complaint as to CV07−02581 re: 184 MOTION to Amend/Correct re Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaints. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
186 LODGED Proposed Second Amended Complaint as to CV07−01492 re: 184 MOTION to Amend/Correct re Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Amend Complaints. Document to be filed by Clerk if Motion to Leave to File or Amend is granted. Filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
187 STIPULATION To Extend Time for Parties to File Responses to Motions for Summary Judgment by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Marcos Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Harold Appling, Cesar Arce Insunza, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Armando Arzate−Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix−Prado, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Jesus M Gaxiola, Jose G Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Magdaleno

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 109 of 114

03/23/2010 03/24/2010 03/26/2010
03/29/2010 04/07/2010

Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon−Torres, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Luis M Llamas Leon, Martin Arturo Lopez, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus G Luque, Rito Luque Luque, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando B Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario M Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 03/18/2010)
188 ORDER − Pursuant to the parties' 187 Stipulation to Extend Time for Parties to File Responses to Motions for Summary Judgment, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED extending the deadline in which the parties may file their Responses, to and including, 4/13/2010. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/23/10. (SAT) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
189 ORDER − IT IS ORDERED denying the 184 Motion to Amend Plaintiffs' Complaints without prejudice. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 3/24/10. (SAT) (Entered: 03/24/2010)
190 Third MOTION to Amend/Correct for Leave to Amend Complaints by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Figueroa Second Amended Complaint (Strike/Unerlined), # 2 Exhibit Jimenez First Amended Complaint (Strike/Underlined), # 3 Text of Proposed Order, # 4 Exhibit Figueroa Proposed Third Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit Jimenez Proposed Second Amended Complaint)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/26/2010)
191 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Ralph DeLeon and Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos from CV07−02581 PHX−GMS by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/29/2010)
192 STIPULATION to Extend Time for Parties to File Responses to Motions for Summary Judgment by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Federico Aguilar Murillo, Josefa Alvarez De Meza, Marcos Amezcua, Sergio Amezcua, Pedro Angulo, Harold

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 110 of 114
Appling, Cesar Arce Insunza, Jose Arellano Juarez, Gumercindo Arroyo−Camacho, Santiago Arzate Carrillo, Armando Arzate−Carrillo, Alfredo Avalos Barron, Raul Avila Almanza, Trinidad Ayon Jusaino, Jose F Becerra, Ismael Becerra Perez, Baldemar Bedolla Bedolla, David Beltran Miranda, Rafael Beltran Nunez, Juan F Beltran Soto, Jacobo Bobadilla German, Jose Botello−Avila, Vicente Briceno Farias, Mario Bustos Cruz, Marcos Antonio Cabrera−Garcia, Octavio Caldera, Manuel Castillo, Mario Castro Mora, Florentino Castro Ramirez, Adelaido Castro Ruiz, Jose R Cazares Aguilar, Francisco Cervantes Gil, Amador Albe Cervantes Sandoval, Jesus Cervantes Sandoval, Jose Chavez Gomez, Rosario E Chinchillas, Jose O Contreras Moroyoqui, Joaquin Cordova Martinez, Baldomero Corona−Ruiz, Cipriano J Crispin Mendez, Josefina Cuara Aguilar, Toledo De La Rosa, Peregrino De La Rosa Toledo, Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Jorge Delgado Marias, Diego Delgado−Torres, Alejandro Duarte, Fernando Duarte Ochoa, Francisco Duarte Rascon, Jesus E Duran, Juan Escalante Carrillo, Guadalupe Espinoza Vargas, Heriberto Espinoza Vargas, Abraham Esquivel, Sergio Felix−Prado, Lucia Franco, Luciano Franco, Antonio Fuentez Zamudio, Raul Gamez−Camacho, Guberto Garcia, Raul Garcia, Salvador Garcia, Jesus M Gaxiola, Jose G Gaxiola, Rosa A Gaxiola, Mauro German Sanchez, Rafael Gil Soto, Alfonso Gomez, Martin Gomez Alvarez, Genoveva M Gonzalez, Gloria E Gonzalez, Maria I Gonzalez, Mariano Gonzalez Espinoza, Saul Gonzalez de Leon, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Ruben Gutierrez−Valdez, Lorenzo Hernandez, Tomas Hernandez, Jesus J Hernandez Chavira, Mario Hernandez Hernandez, Sabas J Hernandez Muniz, Humberto Hernandez Sabori, Jesus Hernandez−Vazquez, Ernesto Herrera−Luna, Magdaleno Isais Casa, Francisco Ledesma, Francisco Leon−Torres, Fernando Linares−Sanchez, Luis M Llamas Leon, Martin Arturo Lopez, Gamiel Lopez Espinoza, Casimiro Lopez Medina, Lino J Lopez−Figueroa, Jose Lopez−Villegas, Teodoro Loya−Carrillo, Pedro Lubiano−Cisneros, Ruben Luna Ramirez, Jesus G Luque, Rito Luque Luque, Juan F Luque−Martinez, Abelino Macias Nunez, Antonio Magana, Sergio Magana Villicana, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Isidro Martinez, Olegario Martinez Carrillo, Maria R Martinez Rosas, Florentino Medina, Trinidad Medina, Rey David Medina Bojorquez, Jesus Medina Uriarte, Jesus Melendrez Prieto, Antonio Mendoza Madrid, Hilario Mesa−Sedano, Orne Meza−Felix, Julian Millan Rochin, Maria A Miranda, Alberto Miranda Haros, Jesus A Miranda Haros, Austroheberto Miranda Miranda, Crisonogo Miranda−Lopez, Carlos Monroy−Vega, Luis A Montanez, Juan Morales−Sanchez, Baltazar Moreno Jurado, Ramon Moreno−Gutierrez, Samuel Murillo Madrigal, Jesus Navarrete Arambula, Demetrio Nerez Pina, Gonzala Nunez, Jose Nunez Avila, Cornelio Nunez Gonzalez, Felix Nunez−Rios, Gerardo Olivarez Hernandez, Rosario Flores Oliverria, Ruben Olvera Gonzalez, Marco A Pacheco Valdez, Carlos Palacios, Enrique Paredes Ruiz, Emiliano Parra, Venancio Patino Ortega, Martin Patino−Juarez, Armando Pena Quinonez, Jesus Penunuri, Armando B Pimienta, Rodrigo Placencia Contreras, Modesto Plasencia, Facundo Quinonez, Aurelio Quinonez Armenta, Oscar Miranda Quiroz, Antonio Ramirez Soto, Juan M Ramirez−Garcia, Jose Luis Ramos, Miguel Angel Rapan, Salvador Raygoza, Javier Rendon Aguilera, Modesto Reyes Zambrano, Graciela Reyes−Medina, Jesus Rodriguez Alvarez, Francisco Rodriguez−Cervantes, Juan Rodriguez−Orozco, Rey A Rodriguez−Palma, Miguel Rodriguez−Ramirez, Ramon I Rodriguez−Rubio, Florencio Rojo Pacheco, Luis Rojo Pacheco, Florencio Rojo Torres, Jaime Ruano−Lomeli, Antonio Rubio, Francisco Saldana, Arturo Salgado Bahena, Ruben Sanchez, Juan Sanchez Huerta, Jose L Sanchez Salas, Salvador Sanchez Solis, Miguel Sanchez−Huerta, Maria E Sandoval Bojorquez, Martin Santos, Rosario M Santos, Uriel Santos, Jose M Segura−Sandoval, Jose Maria Sepulveda, Octavio Serrano, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc., Gonzalo Tapia Haro, Salomon Tapia Haro, Pablo Tirado Duran, Francisco Toledo Garcia, Julian Torres Corona, Hermelinda C Torres Herrera, Jorge L Trejo Gonzalez, Luis Trejo−Lopez, Luis F Valdez Duran, Jose Valdez−Acosta, Victor M Valenzuela, Miguel A Valenzuela Gurrola, Guadalupe Valle Luque, Pedro Colino Vaquero, Gabriel Vargas Avila, Jose Vazquez Huerta, Eleuterio Vega Gil, Enrique Velarde Acosta, Federico Velazquez, Jose C Vibriezca−Ceja, Juan Villa Parra, Martin Villanueva, Victor Villanueva, Jose Villegas Garcia, Leopoldo Zamora Aguilera, Manuel Zamora Sanchez, Vicente Zamudio Trujillo, Mario Zarate Godinez, Gustavo Zerega Espinoza. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/07/2010)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 111 of 114

04/09/2010 04/13/2010 04/13/2010
04/16/2010 04/16/2010 04/26/2010 04/26/2010 04/26/2010 04/26/2010 05/14/2010 05/14/2010 05/20/2010 06/09/2010

193 ORDER pursuant to 192 Stipulation: extending the deadline in which the parties may file their Responses to the Motions for Partial Summary Judgment (Dkt. ## 177, 179, 181), to and including, April 26, 2010. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 4/9/10. (LSP) (Entered: 04/09/2010)
194 ORDER granting 190 Motion to Amend Complaints, and directing Plaintiffs' file their Amended Complaints and serve the amended pleadings on all parties under Rule 5 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 4/13/10.(DMT) (Entered: 04/13/2010)
195 ORDER pursuant to 191 Stipulation of Dismissal; granting the dismissal of Plaintiffs' claims against Ralph DeLeon and Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos in Figueroa v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−2581 PHX GMS. Directing the Clerk of the Court terminate Defendant Ralph DeLeon and Servicios Agricolas Mexicanos' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment 177 as withdrawn.. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 4/13/10. (DMT) (Entered: 04/13/2010)
196 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint as to CV07−01492 against All Defendants, filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez.(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/16/2010)
197 AMENDED COMPLAINT Third Amended Complaint as to CV07−02581 against All Defendants, filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez.(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/16/2010)
198 RESPONSE to Motion re 181 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/26/2010)
199 STATEMENT of Facts re 198 Response to Motion, by Defendants Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Defendants' Exhibits 1−5)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/26/2010)
200 RESPONSE to Motion re 179 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/26/2010)
201 STATEMENT of Plaintiffs' Statement of Facts in Support of their Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion to Dismiss as to Second Figueroa Claim re 200 Response to Motion by Plaintiffs Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1−11)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/26/2010)
202 Reply re 198 Response to 181 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Response in Support of Motion for Partial Summary Judgment by Plaintiffs Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) Modified on 5/20/2010, DOCKET TEXT MODIFIED to correct document linkage, (LSP). (Entered: 05/14/2010)
203 REPLY in Support re 179 MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
204 Notice re Amended Complaints by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Marlin Ranching, Inc., Servicios Agricola Mexicano (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 05/20/2010)
205 STIPULATION Stipulated Request to Amend Complaints by Federico Aguilar Murillo, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order, # 2 Exhibit Jimenez Second Amended Complaint(StrikeOut/Underlined), # 3 Exhibit Figueroa Third Amended Complaint(StrikeOut/Underlined), # 4 Exhibit Jimenez Third Amended Complaint, # 5 Exhibit Figueroa Fourth Amended

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 112 of 114

06/14/2010 09/20/2010 09/28/2010
09/29/2010
10/04/2010 10/04/2010
10/04/2010 10/04/2010 10/20/2010 10/20/2010 11/29/2010 11/30/2010 12/01/2010

Complaint)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/09/2010)
206 ORDER − Pursuant to the parties' 205 Stipulated Request to Amend Complaints, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plas leave to amend their Complaints in this matter to delete the parties which have been previously dismissed. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/14/10. (SAT) (Entered: 06/14/2010)
207 ORDER that Defendants' 179 Motion for Summary Judgment is denied; that Plaintiffs' 181 Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 09/20/10. (NOTE: see attached pdf for complete details) (ESL) (Entered: 09/20/2010)
208 AMENDED by (Doc. 210) ORDER SETTING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE − Pursuant to Rule 16(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as follows: Proposed Final Pretrial Order (lodged) due by 11/19/2010. A Final Pretrial Conference is set for 12/10/2010 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/28/10. (NOTE: See Order for full details)(KMG) Modified on 10/4/2010 (TLJ). (Entered: 09/28/2010)
209 NOTICE and Unopposed MOTION for extension of time − for Modification of Order Setting Pretrial Conference by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Sara De Leon, Marlin Growers Inc, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) Modified on 9/30/2010 CORRECTION: To create pending motion. (KMG). (Entered: 09/29/2010)
210 AMENDED ORDER SETTING FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE re granting 209 Motion for Extension of Time Deadline. Proposed Final Pretrial Order due by 12/23/2010. Final Pretrial Conference set for 1/14/2011 09:00 AM before Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/1/10.(TLJ) (Entered: 10/04/2010)
211 ORDER granting 209 MOTION for Modification of Order Setting Pretrial Conference. ORDER directing Plaintiffs to file and serve their Third Amended Complaint in No. 07−1492−PHX−GMS and Fourth Amended Complaint in No. 07−2581−PHX−GMS no later than 10/6/10. ORDER directing the Defendants to file their Answers to the Third And Fourth Amended Complaints no later than 10/20/10 Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 10/1/10. (TLJ) (Entered: 10/04/2010)
212 AMENDED COMPLAINT Third Amended Complaint as to CV07−01492 against All Defendants, filed by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez.(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 10/04/2010)
213 AMENDED COMPLAINT Fourth Amended Complaint as to CV07−02581 against All Defendants, filed by Federico Aguilar Murillo.(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 10/04/2010)
214 ANSWER to 212 Amended Complaint (THIRD) by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 10/20/2010)
215 ANSWER to 213 Amended Complaint (FOURTH) by Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated.(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 10/20/2010)
216 MOTION Settlement Conference by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) Modified on 11/30/2010 (ESL). (Entered: 11/29/2010)
217 ORDER denying defendants' 216 Motion for Settlement Conference. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 11/30/10.(ESL) (Entered: 11/30/2010)
218 STIPULATION and Request to Amend Order Setting Final Pretrial Conference by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 113 of 114

12/02/2010 12/06/2010 12/07/2010 12/23/2010 12/23/2010 12/29/2010 01/04/2011 01/07/2011 01/10/2011
01/11/2011 01/21/2011
01/21/2011
01/31/2011 02/03/2011

Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 12/01/2010)
219 ORDER denying the 218 Stipulation and Request to Amend Order. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/02/10. (ESL) (Entered: 12/02/2010)
220 STIPULATION Regarding Time for Filing of Proposed Final Pretrial Order by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 12/06/2010)
221 ORDER − IT IS ORDERED granting the 220 Stipulation and extending the time inwhich the Joint Proposed Final Pretrial Order is due, to and including, 12/29/2010. All other deadlines will remain the same. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 12/7/10. (SAT) (Entered: 12/07/2010)
222 Proposed Findings of Fact by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricola Mexicano, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated. (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 12/23/2010)
223 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT and Conclusions of Law by Plaintiffs Federico Aguilar Murillo, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit APamela) (Entered: 12/23/2010)
224 Proposed Pretrial Order (Joint) by Federico Aguilar Murillo, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 12/29/2010)
Notice of request for e−notices by Marni Willenson. (Willenson, Marni) (Entered: 01/04/2011)
225 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Sara DeLeon (Joint) by Federico Aguilar Murillo, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 01/07/2011)
226 Due to a conflict in the Court's calendar, IT IS ORDERED the Final Pretrical Conference, presently set for 1/14/2011 at 9:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET. Pretrial Conference set for 1/21/2011 09:00 a.m. in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. Ordered by Judge G Murray Snow. (ADG)(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry.) (Entered: 01/10/2011)
227 ORDER pursuant to 225 Stipulation of Dismissal, Sara De Leon is dismissed from this matter. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 1/11/11. (TLJ) (Entered: 01/11/2011)
228 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow. Appearances: Joshua Karsh (telephonically), Pamela Bridge, and George McKay for plaintiffs. Tom Crowe for defendants. Final Pretrial Conference held on 1/21/2011. Next Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/8/2011 at 2:00 PM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow. Counsel stipulate to the dismissal of defendant Marlin Ranching, Incorporated. Order to follow.(Court Reporter Gary Moll.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) (Entered: 01/21/2011)
229 ORDER SETTING TRIAL Bench Trial shall begin on 6/7/2011 at 09:00 AM. A Second Final Pretrial Conference shall be held on 4/8/2011 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 01/21/11. (NOTE: see attached pdf for complete details and further instructions)(ESL) (Entered: 01/21/2011)
230 STIPULATION re 229 Order, Set/Reset Hearings,, (Joint) Stipulated Motion to Extend Deadlines by Juan Abarca Figueroa, Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 01/31/2011)
231 ORDER pursuant to the 230 Stipulation for Extending Deadlines; the Bench trial date will remain the same; Final Pretrial Conference reset for 6/3/2011 03:00 PM in Courtroom 602, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, AZ 85003 before Judge G Murray Snow (see order for further details). Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/3/11. (REW) (Entered: 02/03/2011)

Case: 2:07-cv-01492-GMS As of: 10/07/2014 07:49 PM MST 114 of 114

02/17/2011 02/17/2011 02/25/2011
02/25/2011
03/25/2011 04/08/2011 04/28/2011 06/01/2011
06/29/2011 06/30/2011

232 ORDER − Status Conference set for 2/25/2011 11:00 AM before Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/17/11. (LAD) (Entered: 02/17/2011)
233 AMENDED ORDER − Status Conference set for 2/25/2011 01:30 PM before Judge G Murray Snow. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/17/11. (LAD) (Entered: 02/17/2011)
234 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge G Murray Snow. Appearances: Joshua Karsh (telephonically), Pamela Bridge, and George McKay for plaintiffs. Tom Crowe for defendants. Status Conference held on 2/25/2011. Order to follow. (Court Reporter Gary Moll.) This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no PDF document associated with this entry. (KFZ) (Entered: 02/25/2011)
235 ORDER RESETTING TRIAL − Vacating the June 7, 2011 Bench Trial in this matter and resetting it to begin on August 23, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. The trial shall last 8 days (August 23−26, 30−31; September 1−2, 2011). Vacating the second final pretrial conference currently set for June 3, 2011 and resetting for August 12, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 602, Sandra Day O'Connor Federal Courthouse, 401 West Washington Street, Phoenix, Arizona 85003. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 2/25/11. (KMG) (Entered: 02/25/2011)
236 NOTICE re Notice of Service of Damages Charts by Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 03/25/2011)
237 NOTICE of Settlement by Ralph De Leon, Richard De Leon, Marlin Growers Incorporated, Marlin Ranching Company, Servicios Agricolas Mex Incorporated (Crowe, Tom) (Entered: 04/08/2011)
238 STATEMENT (Joint) by Plaintiff Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Murillo Damages Chart)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 04/28/2011)
239 ORDER that this matter will, without further Order of this Court, be dismissed with prejudice within 30 days of the date of this Order unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED directing the Clerk of the Court to terminate Jimenez, et al. V. Servicios Agricolas Mex., Inc., et al., No. CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS on 07/01/11 without further leave of Court. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 06/01/11. (ESL) (Entered: 06/01/2011)
240 STIPULATION Dismissal of CV07−01492−PHX−GMS by Reynaldo Guerra Jimenez, Federico Aguilar Murillo. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Bridge, Pamela) (Entered: 06/29/2011)
241 ORDER pursuant to the 240 Stipulation of Dismissal, it is hereby ordered that that Jimenez v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS is dismissed with prejudice. Directing the Clerk of the Court to unconsolidate Jimenez v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−1492−PHX−GMS and Figueroa v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−2581−PHX−GMS. It is further ordered that any hearings and/or deadlines set in the consolidated cases will remain the same in the ongoing Figueroa v. Servicios Agricolas Mex, Inc., Case No. CV−07−2581−PHX−GMS. The parties are directed to file any further pleadings in the Figueroa case under the appropriate case number. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 06/30/11. (ESL) (Entered: 06/30/2011)