UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

u

-

$

•

-

>

.

EMILY J., a minor, by and through her next friend, MARY J.,
WILLIAM R., a minor, by and through his next friend, SANDRA R.,
MATT A., a minor, by and through his next friend, ROSEMARY A.,
RAMON C , a minor, by and through his next friend, MARIA C ,
MICHAEL T., a minor, by and through his next friend, DENISE T.,
MARK B., a minor, by and through his next friend, ANNA B.,
PAUL M., a minor, by and through his next friend, BARBARA M.,
Plaintiffs
v.
LOWELL P. WEICKER, JR., in his official capacity as Governor, State of Connecticut,
AARON MENT, JR., in his official capacity as Chief Court Administrator of Superior Court, State of Connecticut,
ANTHONY J. SALIUS, in his official official capacity as Director, Family Division, Superior Court, State of Connecticut,
PETER DOBSON, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Bridgeport Juvenile Detention Center
DONALD KONEFAL, in his official capacity as Supervisor, New Haven Juvenile Detention Center,
MARK GUASTA, in his official capacity as Supervisor, Hartford Juvenile Detention Center,
ROSE ALMA SENATORE, in her official capacity as Commissioner, Department of Children and Families, State of Connecticut,

CIVIL NO.

Emily J. v. Weicker

JI-CT-001-001

INTRODUCTION Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit to challenge the conditions of
confinement in the Juvenile Detention Centers operated by the defendant officials of the State of Connecticut. Specifically, plaintiffs claim that the overcrowded conditions at the Bridgeport, Hartford, and New Haven Juvenile Detention Centers (JDC), the lack of adequate medical and mental health care, classification system, staffing, recreational, visitation, and educational opportunities and lack of alternative placements violate their rights under the First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, 42 U.S.C. §1983, 20 U.S.C. §1401 et sea.. §504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §794, and 28 U.S.C. §5633. I. JURISDICTION
1. This action is authorized by 42 U.S.C. §1983, 20 U.S.C. §1401 et sea.. §504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §794, 42 U.S.C. §5633, and jurisdiction over this action is conferred by 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1343(3) and (4).
2. A declaratory judgment is authorized pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§2201 and 2202 and Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Injunctive relief is authorized by Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. An award of costs and attorneys' fees is authorized by 42 U.S.C. §1988. II. PARTIES Plaintiffs
3. Plaintiff Emily J. is, and at all times pertinent herein has been a citizen of the United States and a resident of Bridgeport, Connecticut. She is a thirteen year old girl who has

3 -
7. Plaintiff Michael T. is, and at all times pertinent herein has been a citizen of the United States and a resident of New Haven, Connecticut. He is a sixteen year old boy who has been accused of committing a delinquent act, and who has been committed to the care and custody of defendants at the New Haven Juvenile Detention Center. He brings this lawsuit through his aunt and next friend, Denise T.
8. Plaintiff Mark B. is, and at all times pertinent herein has been a citizen of the United States and a resident of New Haven, Connecticut. He is a fifteen year old boy who has been accused of committing a delinquent act, and who has been committed to the care and custody of defendants at the New Haven Juvenile Detention Center. He brings this lawsuit through his mother and next friend, Anna B.
9. Plaintiff Paul M. is, and at all times pertinent herein has been a citizen of the United States and a resident of North Haven, Connecticut. He is a fifteen year old boy who has been accused of committing a delinquent act, and who has been committed to the care and custody of defendants at the New Haven Juvenile Detention Center. He brings this lawsuit through his mother and next friend, Barbara M. Defendants
10. Defendant Lowell P. Weicker, Jr., is and at all times pertinent herein has been Governor of the State of Connecticut. Defendant Weicker is empowered to take any action concerning the

- 5-
13. Defendant Peter Dobson is, and at all times pertinent herein has been, Supervisor of Bridgeport Juvenile Detention Center. Pursuant to C.G.S. §4 6b-123, he is responsible for the safety of the children residing in that facility. He is sued in his official capacity.
14. Defendant David Konefal is, and at all times pertinent herein has been, Supervisor of New Haven Juvenile Detention Center. Pursuant to C.G.S. §46b-123/ he is responsible for the safety of the children residing in that facility. He is sued in his official capacity.
15. Defendant Mark Guasta is, and at all times pertinent herein has been, Supervisor of the Hartford Juvenile Detention Center. Pursuant to C.G.S. §46b-123, he is responsible for the safety of the children residing in that facility. He is sued in his official capacity.
16. Defendant Rose Alma Senatore is and at all time pertinent herein has been Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families (DCF). Pursuant to C.G.S. §17a-6, she is responsible for the overall operation, direction and supervision of DCF, for preparing and administering DCF's budget, for adopting and enforcing regulations and rules for the Department's operation, and for the administration of all state and federal funds received by DCF for its programs and activities.
17. Defendant Vincent Ferrandino is and at all times pertinent herein has been Commissioner of the Department of Education.

- 7-

i

education services to children confined at the NHJDC. He is sued

in his official capacity.

III. CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

21. The named plaintiffs bring this action as a class action

pursuant to Rule 23 (b) (1) and (2) of the Federal Rules of Civil I

Procedure.

'-

j

I
i

22. Plaintiffs file this complaint on behalf of themselves and

all others similarly situated and seek injunctive and declaratory
i i
relief from the unconstitutional and unlawful actions and inactions !

i

I

of defendants, as herein set forth.

!

|

23. The named plaintiffs are children who are detained in one i

of the three juvenile detention centers and have suffered the !

deprivations of rights claimed herein.

I

24. The class plaintiffs seek to represent is composed of all \

children who are, or will be, in the care, custody, or supervision i

of defendants as a result of being accused of a delinquent act or

adjudicated as a delinquent.

25. Joinder of all members is impracticable as the class

includes more than sixty children at any one time, and over 3,000

children during the course of a year, and class membership

fluctuates continuously.

26. There are many questions of law and fact common to the

members of the plaintiff class including:

a. whether defendants' failure to provide adequate living

conditions, recreational opportunities, staffing, rehabilitative

- 8-
treatment, classification, evaluation and alternative placements, violates plaintiffs' rights to personal safety and non-punitive conditions of confinement and their right to treatment in the least restrictive setting and under the least restrictive conditions as guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution and 42 U.S.C. §5633;
b. whether defendants have failed to adopt and implement policies and protocols to provide adequate medical and mental health care to plaintiffs and those they seek to represent, in violation of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution;
c. whether defendants' failure to provide students, including handicapped and disabled students with a free and appropriate public education deprive plaintiffs of their rights guaranteed by Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1401 et sea. (P.L. 94-142) and its implementing regulations at 34 C.F.R. §§300 et seq.. by 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §794, and the equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment; and
d. whether defendants' interference with plaintiffs' access to their families and attorneys violates plaintiffs' rights as guaranteed by the First, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.
27. The claims of the representative parties are typical of those of the class in that the constitutional and statutory

- 9 -
deprivations alleged by the named plaintiffs and caused by defendants are materially the same as those suffered by all other class members.
28. The representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. The named plaintiffs have no interests antagonistic to those of the class. Further, plaintiffs are represented by attorneys experienced in children's rights and federal constitutional litigation.
29. The prosecution of separate actions by individual members of the class would create a risk of inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual members of the class which would establish incompatible standards of conduct for defendants.
30. Defendants have consistently acted and refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby* making appropriate final injunctive and declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole. IV. STATEMENT OF PACTS
DESCRIPTION OP PLAINTIFFS EMILY J.
31. Plaintiff Emily J. is a thirteen year child who has been incarcerated at the Bridgeport Juvenile Detention Center on delinquent charges since August 31, 1993.
32. Emily is from a dysfunctional family. Prior to her arrest, she had been living with her sister. Her mother is homeless and itinerant and her father's whereabouts are unknown.

- 10 -
33. Prior to her incarceration, Emily had been truant from school for a period of two years. She has been found to be a "handicapped" child under special education laws and was placed in an ungraded special class but was "dropped due to lack of attendance" by the Bridgeport Board of Education.
34. In March of 1993, Emily was placed in the custody of DCF as a result of a voluntary agreement by her mother. She was placed in a shelter in May but did not remain there. Although Emily has a DCF worker, the worker has not been to see her in detention.
35. The probation officer filed an "uncared for" petition on Emily on September 3, 1993 alleging that her mother is unable to provide a home for her.
36. After being remanded to the Detention Center, Emily was incarcerated in a cell with two other girls. The ventilation in the cell made breathing difficult.
37. Since her incarceration, Emily has not been outside at all or breathed any fresh air.
38. Much of her time has been spent locked alone in her room for disciplinary reasons. She was locked for three days in a row, having been given consecutive periods of "room confinement." Defendants provide no toilet facilities in the cells to which plaintiffs are confined. While locked in her room, defendants' staff failed to release her to go to the bathroom. After urinating on the floor, she was given additional "room confinement."

- 12 -

i

WILLIAM R.

'

47. Plaintiff William R. is a thirteen year old child who j
i
has been detained at the Hartford Juvenile Detention Center since

August 16, 1993.

j

48. William is a child who has been identified as having j

many needs. He has witnessed a lot of family violence. At the age

of eight, he was placed at the ABC program at Mt. Sinai Hospital. ; i

49. In February, 1993, William was voluntarily placed with

DCF by his mother. He was placed unsuccessfully in several shelters

in May and June. He has not seen his DCF worker since June.

Although DCF intended to close his case after he was held in

detention, they were finally persuaded otherwise by William's

attorney.

50. William has been identified as needing a highly

structured twenty-four hour treatment milieu. He has low IQ, and

reading impairment, lacks a supportive primary family, and has

lacked a sufficient treatment program up to this point. He has been

incarcerated for over forty days awaiting residential placement.

51. While incarcerated, William has been locked with

another child in a room designed for one child.

52. William has been subjected to excessive and

inappropriate discipline by staff. He has been given forty-eight

hours of "room confinement" which has been spread out over a four

day period of time. He has not been allowed to have any reading or

- 14 -

59. He has not been allowed to go outside since being

incarcerated, nor has he breathed any fresh air in over three weeks.

60. Because of the overcrowding in the facility, much of

Matt's time is idle. Other than play basketball and go to school

i

for less than two hours a day in the crowded room, there is little j

i

else to occupy his time.

j

61. He has received excessive "room confinement," being

locked in his room for hours at a time. On one occasion, he

received six hours of solitary confinement for allegedly talking

back to a staff member.

62. The Bridgeport Board of Education has concluded that

due to "poor self-esteem and minimal interpersonal relation skills"

he is handicapped under federal and state law, in need of special

education services, and designated him socially/emotionally

maladjusted. He has not received any of the support services to

which he is entitled.

63. Matt's grandmother has raised Matt since he was a baby.

Despite this fact, when his grandmother has attempted to come to

visit him or call him, or he has tried to reach her, staff has not

allowed the contact.

RAMON C.

64. Plaintiff Ramon C. is a fourteen year old child who has

been incarcerated at the Hartford Juvenile Detention Center since

September 11, 1993.

- 16 -
72. Upon information and belief, he has not been seen by any doctor since being incarcerated.
MICHAEL T. 73. Plaintiff Michael T. is a sixteen year old child who
has been incarcerated at the New Haven Juvenile Detention Center since December 29, 1992.
74. He has many psychological problems, including posttraumatic stress disorder. He was referred to the Henry D. Altobello Children and Youth Center for psychiatric evaluation but after receiving such evaluation, was sent back to detention. Although the evaluation indicated he was in need of regular individual counseling, he has not received such counseling.
75. Michael has been evaluated as needing treatment in a residential facility. Because of the lack of facilities, he has been waiting for a placement for over nine months.
76. Michael has been diagnosed as having a systolic heart murmur and an umbilical hernia. Although he is in need of an operation, he has not yet received it.
77. His educational program has not been more than two hours a day. Because on many occasions it consisted of watching nature films, he has not been attending school.
78. He has frequently been given excessive lock time for talking back to staff and hitting a ball onto the roof. On one occasion, he was locked for twenty-four hours.

- 18 -

87. A residential treatment facility was recommended by the

court clinic and he has been awaiting placement.

PAUL M.

88. Plaintiff Paul M. is a fifteen year old child who has

been incarcerated in the New Haven Juvenile Detention Center since

September 17, 1993. He is a "Family with Service Needs" child who

is being held at the facility on a violation of probation for j
i i

violating curfew and probation on a minor misdemeanor charge.

i

89. Paul has been diagnosed as having dysthymia, ADHD, and ',

alcohol abuse.

90. He has been hospitalized at Elmcrest for his chemical

dependency on alcohol. He also has had a history of cutting his wrists. Prior to his incarceration, he had dropped out of school. !

91. Because of the overcrowding, he has slept on the floor

in a cell with another child.

92. He was not examined by any medical personnel until

three days after admittance to the detention facility.

j

93. Paul attends school only two hours a day.

94. He has been subject to verbal abuse by the staff. On

one occasion, he was given "room confinement" for asking a question

to a staff member.
1
95. Paul has received no group or individual counseling for

his alcohol problem since being incarcerated.

- 20 -

101. These children have had limited socialization from an

early age and suffer from the damaging effects of poverty, substance

abuse, and violence in their families and neighborhoods.

102. Some children are admitted to detention for serious

juvenile offenses, while many are admitted as FWSN on a violation

of court order or for minor offenses such as breach of peace. Some

are committed to the Department of Children and Families (DCF) at

the time they enter the detention facilities.

103. Children stay for varying lengths of time ranging from

twenty-four hours to over a year.

i

A. LIVING CONDITIONS

j

104. Pursuant to C.G.S. §46b-133(g) the Judicial Department i

has established bed capacity at each detention facility as follows: !

Bridgeport

16

New Haven

24

Hartford

24

105. Intake, average length of stay, and average daily I
1

population have increased in recent years at all three facilities. j

Since 1988, the number of cases entering the juvenile justice system

has increased by 23% during a period of time when the staff and

related resources in that division have been reduced because of

budget constraints.

106. The current statewide capacity of the three Juvenile

Detention Centers is sixty-four. During the last six months, the

average daily population has been 114. With 3,115 children admitted

- 22 -

both staff and facilities. It has caused stress on staff, created

a heightened sense of fear among the children, and increased the

risk of children harming each other.

112.

Defendants fail to maintain an adequate

classification system. Boys are placed inappropriately on the

girls' wing at all three facilities because of space limitations.

This practice has severely compromised the privacy of the girls.

In addition, children as young as eight to ten are housed with older

teens. Children who are identified as FWSN and incarcerated on a

violation of court order or breach of peace are commingled with

children accused of serious juvenile offenses.

113. On some occasions when the HJDC is overcrowded,

children from Hartford are transferred to the New Haven and

Bridgeport detention centers.

114. Defendants' overcrowding has impeded the safety of

the children and caused the children to become frustrated more

quickly, causing increased tension and more fights. As recently as

April, 1993, state police had to be called to control the youths in

the BJDC. On another occasion in August, 1993, at BJDC, a child

allegedly became the victim of a sexual assault while tripled in a

cell designed for one child. In May, 1993, a sexual assault

allegedly occurred on a mentally disabled child housed at HJDC in

a cell designed for one child.

- 24 -
122. At several of the facilities, defendants do not provide children with enough food. Although defendants have a menu, it is often not followed. Food has been withheld as punishment. Staff has taken food home.
123. Defendants do not provide children with adequate clean underwear in a timely fashion because of the overcrowding.
124. The recreational opportunities as described in Section D, infra are severely restricted. Because of the overcrowding, there is insufficient room to engage in active or passive exercise.
125. Although defendants are directed, pursuant to C.G.S. §46b-133(g), to admit children to detention only under certain criteria when the detention center equals or exceeds maximum capacity, they have not exercised such authority, instead leaving the facilities overcrowded.
12 6. Defendants have also failed to implement other remedies to reduce overcrowding which they have identified such as expanding intensive supervision, and reducing intake of DCF clients.
B. MENTAL HEALTH 127. An increasing number of children entrusted to
defendants' custody are seriously emotionally disturbed. Some show evidence of fetal-alcohol syndrome. There has been a significant increase in the number who seem very depressed or who have suicidal thoughts.

- 26 -

134. Although defendants have identified the need to

address areas of anger and stress management, AIDS prevention, self-

esteem, conflict resolution, health care, basic life skills, and

peer/family relationships, inadequate steps have been taken to

implement counseling in any of these areas.

135.

Although many children are from alcoholic

backgrounds, defendants have discontinued both Al-anon and AA at the

centers.

136. Defendants have failed to institute a culturally and

linguistically appropriate system to deliver mental health care to

many Latino children who are incarcerated.

C. MEDICAL SERVICES

137. The children who enter the juvenile detention centers

are medically at high risk. Because of their poverty backgrounds,

many have not seen a physician since early childhood and lack a

regular source of coordinated health care prior to incarceration.

Some enter as pregnant teenagers who are at high risk of delivering

a low birth weight baby. Others enter with HIV and other contagious

diseases such as venereal disease. Still others suffer from alcohol

and other drug abuse.

13 8. Defendants provide only approximately 65% of the

i juveniles with any kind of medical screening during the first three

days of their stay. This screening is extremely cursory and does

not include such information as medical history, immunizations,

alcohol or drug use, whether the child needs medication for on-going

- 28 -
weekly. In NHJDC, a physician is allowed to spend an additional 3 hours per week. This amount of coverage does not allow for adequate screening, daily sick call, on-going services for continuing medical needs, or more specialized diagnostic procedures including blood work.
144. There are no medics on staff at any of the detention facilities.
145. Girls have no access on a routine basis to appropriate reproductive health care. Girls who are pregnant receive inadequate prenatal care, diet, and counseling or none at all.
146. There is also inadequate space to isolate children with communicable diseases in a medical unit.
147. The defendants have failed to put in place any organized quality assurance program to monitor, analyze, and improve medical and mental health services.
148. Although defendants Salius and Ment asked for additional funds to upgrade medical services, defendant Weicker failed to include such request in the Judicial Department biennial budget he submitted to the legislature for fiscal years 1993-1995.
D. RECREATION 149. Although adolescents need regular exercise for proper
growth, and as an outlet for tensions and frustrations that develop in a confined setting, defendants never permit the children to go

- 30 -
in Bridgeport, 30,896 hours in New Haven, and 29,136 hours in Hartford for a total of 68,864 hours which needed to be filled by overtime and per diems.
165. The large number of hours provided by per diems causes such problems as having less qualified and experienced staff and inappropriate training. This staffing pattern compromises the safety and welfare of the children.
166. Defendants provide no resources for either timely or specialized training for new employees or sufficient refresher training. This lack of staff training has made potentially dangerous situations worsen as well as caused stress to be inadequately handled by staff.
167. Defendants Salius and Ment previously had established a three-week staff training course for new employees but have discontinued such training.
168. Although staff deals with a population that exhibits a high incidence of psychopathology, learning disabilities, attention deficit disorder, and other handicapping conditions, defendants provide inadequate staff training in these areas. As a result, the special needs of these children are not met, and they are sometimes severely mistreated.
169. Defendants' failure to employ adequately trained staff results in lack of attention to plaintiffs' problems during confinement, lack of appropriate assessment of plaintiffs' physical and emotional needs, and lack of remedial programs. Such failure

- 32 -
special education needs, if any, and to place them in appropriate educational programs equivalent to children outside the facility.
175. The educational services delivered to special education students are insufficient. There are often no planning and placement team ("PPT11) meetings, or individual education plans ("IEP") as required by state and federal law.
176. When IEPs are developed, they are often not followed. For those children diagnosed as "socially and emotionally maladjusted," defendants have failed to provide the necessary support services, including speech and hearing therapy, and counseling services.
177. Defendants have failed to institute a system for coordination with the student's school of origin both while the child is in detention and after the child leaves.
178. At all three facilities, children receive inadequate educational instruction time, usually no more than two hours per day.
179. At all three facilities, there is insufficient space to accommodate any meaningful educational program.
180. Contrary to the mandates of 20 U.S.C. §1415 (b) (1) (B) , and regulations promulgated thereunder, specifically 34 C.F.R. 300.514, defendants have failed to recruit, train or assign "surrogate parents" to DCF-committed children confined at the detention centers who are eligible for and/or in need of special education services.

34 -
given child to ten to twenty minutes. At New Haven, there are four hours available for visitation, but visits are limited to one hour for any given child.
186. There is insufficient space for confidential communications between the children and their attorneys.
187. Defendants allow plaintiffs and their class only one outgoing telephone call each day. At New Haven, this call is restricted to five minutes, even if it is a call to a lawyer. At Hartford, the call may only be placed between 2:30 and 4:00 p.m. or 8:00 and 9:00 p.m. Children are not allowed to call their friends or relatives other than their parents. If the line is busy when a child makes a call, some detention staff do not let the child call again until the next day.
H. DISCIPLINE 188. Despite the fact that state law, C.G.S. §46b-133(d),
prohibits solitary confinement, defendants have placed children in solitary confinement in their rooms as routinely-imposed punishment for misbehavior. Some children have been given four days of room confinement. At some of the facilities, the children are not released for meals, recreation, education, or exercise. Because some staff are slow to determine whether children in room confinement are in need of sanitary facilities, on some occasions, children have urinated in their rooms. On occasion, children have been left in urine soaked clothing for long periods of time.

- 36 -

I. FAILURE TO DEVELOP ALTERNATIVE AND LESS RESTRICTIVE PLACEMENTS

195. Many children are locked up on minor charges such as

breach of peace because families cannot be located or do not want

to take them home. As a result, they become abandoned. Defendants

fail, however, to file "uncared for" petitions, contact or notify

DCF or arrange for children placed in alternative facilities.

196. When DCF is notified, tension between the two state

agencies as to which has responsibility for the child often results.

197. DCF social workers rarely visit DCF children being

kept in juvenile detention.

198. The centers are often used to warehouse children DCF

cannot place or to hold children until DCF workers eventually

explore placement.

1

199. Although many children go from detention centers,

upon sentencing, to DCF facilities and DCF-licensed facilities,

there is a serious lack of coordination between the detention

centers and such facilities. Children often miss appointments with

state authorities due to this lack of coordination and the state's

failure to provide transportation.

200. Frequently, the Juvenile Court must order DCF workers

to remove children in order to get action. Many times, attorneys,

subsequently appointed to represent detained children, must file

neglected or uncared for petitions with DCF in order to obtain

action for their clients.

- 38 -
Program (AIP) servicing 3,500 adult criminal offenders, placing 80% in alternative sentencing arrangements, the defendants have failed to establish a similar system for juveniles.
207. Although defendant Ment acknowledged the need for an alternative sanctions program for juveniles, defendant Weicker failed to include such requests in the biennial budget submitted to the legislature and no such program has been implemented.
208. The State of Connecticut receives federal funding pursuant to the Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act. Defendants fail to fulfill the requirements of the Act by failing to file annual updates to the plan and annual evaluations of their programs and by failing to administer their programs equitably on the basis of gender, race, and mentally, emotionally, or physically handicapping conditions.
J. INACTION BY DEPENDANTS 209. Defendants have had long standing knowledge of the
problems described above. 210. Innumerable studies and task force reports by and for
the defendants include: "Report on the Juvenile Justice System in Connecticut." (October, 1983); "Delinquency in Connecticut, the Changing Juvenile Court." (May, 1984); "Tracking Juvenile Offenders into the Adult Criminal Justice System." (1985); "Juvenile Justice in Connecticut," (January, 1989); "Three Model Youth Programs; A Federally Sponsored State Initiativef" (July, 1992); "Alternative Sanctions in the Superior Court/Juvenile Matters." (March, 1993).

- 40 -

216. Defendants have knowingly failed to adopt and implement '
i
policies and protocols to provide adequate medical and mental health i
i
care to plaintiffs and those they seek to represent, in violation

of their rights under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States !

Constitution.

!

VII. THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

|

i

217. Paragraphs one through two hundred and sixteen are

incorporated herein by reference the same as though pleaded in full.

218. Defendants' failure to provide handicapped and disabled

students with a free and appropriate public education deprives

plaintiffs and members of their class of their rights guaranteed by

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §1401 et seq.

(P.L. 94-142) and its implementing regulations at 34 C.F.R. §§300

et seq. and by §504 of the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. §794.

219. Defendants' refusal and failure to provide, or ensure the

provision of free and appropriate public educational services,

including special education services to children detained in the

juvenile detention facilities, while providing such services to

other children residing in the community, violates the rights of

plaintiffs and members of their class under the Equal Protection

Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

VIII. FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

220. Paragraphs one through two hundred and nineteen are

incorporated herein by reference the same as though pleaded in full.

- 42 -

a. adequate and safe living conditions;

!

b. adequate and timely medical and mental health care; •

c. appropriate staffing;

j

d. appropriate educational opportunities;

e. adequate recreation;

f. sufficient visitation and phone calls;

\

g. appropriate classification and disciplinary procedures; i

h. system of alternative and less restrictive placements; j

4. Enter a declaratory judgment declaring that the conditions :

of confinement of plaintiffs and members of their class are

violative of their rights as guaranteed by the First, Sixth, and

Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, 42 U.S.C.

§1983, 20 U.S.C. §§1401 et. seq.. §504 of the Rehabilitation Act,

29 U.S.C. §794, and 42 U.S.C. §5633;

5. Award costs and attorneys' fees;

6. Grant such further and other relief as this court deems

just and proper.

Respectfully Submitted,

BY: Martha Stone #ct00080 Connecticut Civil Liberties Union Foundation 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106
JoNel Newman #ctO2179 Connecticut Civil Liberties
Union Foundation 32 Grand Street Hartford, CT 06106

 
 Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IDDJ ;:, - '0

.: 50

EMILY J., ET. AL.
V.
M. JODI RELL, ET. AL.

NO. 3:93CV1944 (RNC) JUNE 3, 2005

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 2 of 22

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. DEFINITION SECTION ................................................................ II. BACKGROUND .............................................................................. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................ IV. SER'VICES ...............................,'.....................................................
V. MONITORING ......................................................................... VI. MISCELLANEOUS ........................................................................... VII. COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES .....................................

PAGE 3 5 6 9 13 17 19

2

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 3 of 22

I.

DEFINITION SECTION

As used in this Settlement Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), the following

terms shall have the following meaning unless specifically stated otherwise:

1. "Alternative Detention Program" means a staff secure, residential

program contracted by the Judicial Branch.

2.

"Central Placement Team" means an administrative review process by

Department of Children and Families to match children and youth with mental health

problems to appropriate residential treatmc:nt facilities and group homes, and includes the

curren! review process by the Director of Juvenile Justice, the Chief of Operations and

the Director of Behavioral Health.

3. "Community Detention Center" means a physically secure, community-

based detention facility contracted for by the Judicial Branch.

4. "DCF" means Department of Children and Families.

5. "Defendants" for purposes of this Agreement are the Chief Court

Administrator, the Executive Director of tile Court Support Services Division, the

Supervisors of the Bridgeport, New Haven, and Hartford Juvenile Detention Centers, the

Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families, the Governor of the State of

Connecticut.

6. "CSSD" is the Court Support Services Division of the judicial Branch.

7. "Flexible Funds" means discretionary funds to obtain needed services

and/or goods, as described in DCF Policy Manual.

8. "Laws ofthe State of Connecticut": consists of state constitutional

provisions, statutes, judicial decisions, Rules of Court as promulgated by or issuing from

3

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 4 of 22
the State OfCOlUlccticutjudicial, executive or legislative branches, and regulations of
administrative agencies other than those agencies party to this lawsuit. 9. Level 1.5 Group Home means an enhanced group home that is a
therapeutic, community living program intended to serve adolescents with minimal-tomoderate behavioral health disorders. While these adolescents may likely demonstrate a nced for behavioral health intervention, they will not present with serious and persistent psychiatric disorders that require a higher level of care. The group home milieu and services will provide individualized treatment and support for each adolescent's emotional problems, development of interpersonal skills, educational and pre-vocational skills and independent living skills.
10. Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care is foster care for delinquent classmembers placed, either singly or at most with another classmember or nonclassmember, in a family setting for approximately 6-9 months. MTFC families will implement a structured, individualized program for each classmember that simultaneously builds on the classmember's strengths, and sets clear rules, expectations, and limits. The MTFC parents will be supported by a multidimensional treatment foster care case manager who will coordinate the: classmember's treatment program, and provide weekly supervision and support meetings for the parents. Other components include skill-focused individual treatment for the classmember, weekly family therapy for the biological parents, frequent contact with the biological family, close monitoring of progress in school, and psychiatric consu11ationlmedication management as needed.
4

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 5 of 22
II. "State Detention Center" means one of the 3 centers located at the following addresses: 920 Broad St., Hartford, CT; 784 Fairfield Ave., Bridgeport, CT; 239 Whalley Ave., New Haven, CT.
II. BACKGROUND
I. This Agreement is made and entered into by the parties in order to resolve issues raised by the plaintiffs' class in Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time of Supplemental Order and Joint Corrective Action Plan dated July 9, 2004.
2. Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint, by and through their next friends, on October 25, 1993 alleging that certain conditions and practices in the Detention Centers were unlawful. The Court certified a class on January 14,1994 consisting of all youth confined in the Detention Centers at that time and who may in the future be confmed in the Detention Centers.
3. A Consent Judgment was approved by this Court on February 6, 1997 and became effective March 8,1997. On June 24, 2002, in order to acknowledge that defendants had accomplished many of the original objectives of that Consent Judgment, and in order to allow the defendants to focus on improving four main areas of the original Consent Judgment, the plaintiffs and defendants agreed to substitute a Stipulated Agreement for the original Consent Judgment entered into on February 6,1997. That Stipulated Agreement was approved by thl: Court after a fairness hearing on August 12, 2002. In addition, on June 24, 2004 the Court entered an Order for Supplemental Relief ordering the parties to, inter alia, implement a Joint Corrective Action Plan (hereinafter
5

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 6 of 22
"leAP"). The stated purpose of the lCAP was ..... to ensure that the constitutional rights
of classmembers to adequate mental health services are safeguarded, and that the Defendants' obligations thereunder are fully satisfied." JCAP at p. 2. Throughout the life of the original Consent Judgment, the Stipulated Agreement and the JCAP, the parties have worked cooperatively with a court-appointed monitor in an effort to accomplish all of the provisions contained therein. The parties recognize that the defendants have made considerable progress toward achieving the goals of the Consent Judgment, the Stipulated Agreement and the JCAP. The parties further recognize that maintaining and furthering these achievements is desirable. This Settlement Agreement is entered into with the further understanding and cooperation of all parties directed towards further improving the provisions of mental health services to classmembers.
4. The parties to this Agreement agree and represent that this Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to protect the interests ofthe class in accordance with Rule 23, Fed. R. Civ. P. and also is narrowly drawn and extends no further than what is necessary and the least intrusive means to address the federal constitutional claims of the classmembers.
5. This Agreement is binding 1)n all class members and on the defendants, their successors in office, agents, and employees.
III. GENERAL PROVISIONS I. Nothing in this Agreement rihall require or permit the defendants to violate
the laws of the State of Connecticut. If there is any conflict between the defendants' obligations under this Agreement and the laws of the State of Connecticut, then the
6

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 7 of 22
defendants shall have the option of following the laws of the State of Connecticut. In the event that the defendants choose such option, the plaintiffs may opt to litigate the claims raised in this lawsuit. If the plaintiffs exercise this option, then the defendants are relieved of all obligations under this Agreement and the Agreement entered pursuant hereto shall be vacated.
2. The provisions of this Agreement are the result of lengthy and careful negotiation among all the parties. They have been agreed upon solely as a means to put a reasonable end to the issues raised in the Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time of Supplemental Order and Joint Corrective Action Plan dated July 9,2004, and to avoid the costs, time and risks which would be involved for both parties. The Agreement embodies a compromise of the issues involved in this case and, while its provisions are binding on the parties herein, its provisions are not to be construed to be statements, rulings, or precedents with respect to the constitutional and other legal rights ofpersons who are parties or nonparties to this litigation in this or any other action. Each party acknowledges that it is entering into this Agreement to settle and compromise disputed claims and defenses and that entering into this Agreement should not be construed as statements, rulings, or precedents with respect to the constitutional or other legal rights of person or persons involved in any action other than members of the plaintiff class in this action.
3. The intent of the parties is to provide supplemental services to classmembers to increase the number of classmembcrs diverted from residential placements. Highest preference will be given to classmembers in detention; any
7

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 8 of 22
exceptions will require approval of the DCF chief operating officer or her designee and will be reported to the plaintiffs and the Monitor.
4. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed so as to affect or limit the authority of Connecticut courts or the Judi<:ial Branch to remand children to juvenile detention centers or the authority of DCF to place a child who is in DCF's custody.
5. The parties agree that all rights and obligations created by this Agreement shall terminate and no longer be enforceable without the need for any further order of the Court on September 30, 2007, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, based on the Court's express finding of a constitutional violation resulting from noncompliance with this Agreement.
6. Defendants shall notify all relevant staff of the provisions of this Agreement. Counsel for plaintiffs may meet with c1assmembers in each detention center, community detention center, and alternative detention program to describe its terms. Defendants shall make available copies of this Agreement to appropriate probation staff and, upon request, to counsel for any c1assmember in each detention center, community detention center, and alternative detention program.
7. The parties agree that, upon the Court's approval, this Agreement replaces the Court's Order for Supplemental Relief entered on June 24, 2002 and that the provisions ofthat Order (including the Joint Corrective Action Plan) are no longer in effect. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to prohibit the plaintiffs from bringing a new lawsuit to challenge the conditions covered by those provisions or other matters not covered by this Agreement.
8

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 9 of 22
8. Except as otherwise provided, the obligations of the state defendants to perfonn the tenns and conditions of this Agreement shall become operative upon 1) approval by the General Assembly ofthe State of Connecticut in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes Sec. 3-125a, and 2) approval by this Court pursuant to federal rules pertaining to class actions.
IV. SERVICES
The parties agree that the following new services will be provided to certain classmembers over Years 1 and 2 as defined below, to supplement the current service delivery system available to classmembers:
YEAR 1: October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006
1. The defendants shall provide supplemental services as specified below for the period October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006 at an estimated cost not to exceed $2,538,438.
2. No later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall contract for a minimum of 10-15 multidimensional treatment foster care slots l at an estimated cost not to exceed $433,438 per year. The contract(s) for such service shall define the service as specified in this Agreement. These slots shall be used as an alternative to treatment and placement in residential treatment facilities for such c1assmembers who are identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team, or during the CPT process, as otherwise requiring residential placement.
1 A slot is defined as a single placement
9

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 10 of 22
3. For classmembers from the City of Hartford, no later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall contract for a minimum of 14-20 multidimensional treatment fostcr care slots, at an estimated cost not to exceed $520,000 per year. These slots shall be used as an alternative to treatment and placement in residential treatment facilities for such c1assmembers who are identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team, or during the CPT process, as otherwise n,quiring residential placement.
4. For classmembers from the City of Hartford, no later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall contract for a level 1.5 group home for four to six classmembers at an estimated cost not to exceed $675,000 per year. This home shall be for such classmembers who are identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team, or during the CPT process as otherwise needing treatment and placement in a residential treatment facility, and shall be clinically staffed to meet the behavioral health needs of these classmembers.
5. For c1assmembers from the City of Hartford, no later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall provide identified community-based services/programs, to supplement such services and programs already in existence. The following services shall be available for those c1assmembers identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team and/or CPT process who would otherwise need treatment and placement in a residential treatment facility but for the access to such services:
a. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services at a cost not to exceed $250,000 per year for approximately 25 classmembers;
b. Flexible Funds at a cost of$100,000 per year;
10

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 11 of 22

c.

Post Multi-Systemic Therapy support and treatment services for 12

months or longer, at a cost not to exceed $230,000 per year for approximately 30 families

who have completed MST; d. Wrap-around home-based behavioral health treatment services2

developed pursuant to an individualized phm, including but not limited to trauma-

focused gender specific treatment at a cost of $200,000 per year;

e. Flexible Funds in the amount of $1 00,000 per year to help

classmembers achieve educational success.

f. Therapeutic mentors at a cost not to exceed $75,000 per year for a

minimum of 25 c1assmembers.

6. By October I, 2005, the Defendants shall provide joint specialized training

on care coordination and applying the wrap-around care coordination principles and

practices for all DCF workers, parole officers and probation officers assigned to such

c1assmembers from the City of Hartford, who have not already received such training, and no later than October 1, 2006 for such workers and officers in the remaining parts of

the state who have not already received such training. For those c1assmemhers who have

an assigned DCF child welfare social worker, the social worker shall work

collaboratively with the c1assmembers' probation officer or parole officer. When the

class member has not been committed previously to DCF as a delinquent, the probation

officer shall act as the case manager and the DCF social worker shall be responsible for

collaborating on the development of the probation treatment plan, facilitating access to

appropriate DCF services and monitoring the c1assmember's progress in treatment. In

2 The components would include comprehensive assessment, clinical support team, mobile crisis and intensive case management.
11

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 12 of 22
the c1assmember is committed to DCF as a delinquent, the parole officer shall act as the case manager, and the DCF social worker shall be responsible for collaborating on the developing of the probation or parole treatment plan, facilitating access to appropriate DCF services and monitoring the c1assmember's progress in treatment.
7. No later than October I, 2005, defendants shall develop and implement a special pre-adjudication case review proto(:ol for classmembers involved with DCF, designed to develop treatment/service plans and identify options for services and placements with the goal of reducing the number of days such classmembers spend in detention. Plaintiffs and the Monitor shall have the opportunity to comment on such protocol prior to its implementation. The plaintiffs will meet with the public defenders to review the proposed protocol and coordinate any recommendations. The defendants have the sole discretion to determine the fmal case review protocol.
8. If there is insufficient demand for the services described above, from the c1assmembers from the City of Hartford, the defendants may utilize these services for other classmembers served by the Hartford Juvenile Court.
Year 2: October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007 9. No later than April I, 2006, defendants shall prepare a specific plan to
extend the services listed in sections 2 through 5 above to c1assmembers throughout the state who would otherwise be placed in residential treatment facilities. The plan will provide for a similar array of services for such classinembers and will have a total cost of not more than an additional $3.5 million over and above the costs for year I. The
12

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 13 of 22
plaintiffs will be given an opportunity to comment on the plan prior to its implementation.
lO. Prior to the implementation ofthe Year 2 plan, the parties shall meet with the monitor to discuss any concerns with the plan. The parties will use good faith efforts to resolve any problems, provided the total cost of such plan may not exceed $6, 083,438.3
11. The defendants, through DCF, will implement the plan as expeditiously as possible, with contracts executed by October 1, 2006. The plan may be developed with consideration of related off-sets, savings or reallocations within existing budget resources. In the event the legislature fails to appropriate adequate funding to implement the plan, the plaintiffs reserve the right to pursue appropriate judicial relief to enforce this agreement.
12. During the two-year period of this agreement, the defendants will periodically review contractor expenditures for the services listed above; if underexpenditure from the maximum amounts listed above is identified, and cannot be reasonably spent during the same fiscal year, the defendants will develop a plan to expend those funds for the benefit of classmembers, consistent with this agreement. Plaintiffs and the Monitor shall have the opportunity to comment on such plan prior to its finalization. Implementation of the plan must comply with all state law.
V. MONITORING The defendants agree to the followmg monitoring of its obligations under this
agreement:
3 Total costs includes extending Year I costs into Year 2, plus additional roll-out funding for Year 2.
13

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 14 of 22
I. The current monitor, Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. , shall monitor compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that Dr. Carl is unable to continue as monitor, the parties shall mutually select his replacement. If the parties are unable to agree upon a monitor, the Court shall select a monitor from nominations provided by the parties.
2. The State of Connecticut shall pay the monitor for his services at a rate of $125 per hour, including travel time, and reasonable costs and expenses pursuant to a budget approved by the Court.
3. In perfonning his or her duties, the monitor shall have reasonable access to the detainees confmed in the state and community detention centers and alternative detention programs, the staff of such facilities, and to files, reports and documents pertaining to such detainees which are relevant to the monitor's responsibilities under this Agreement.
4. The monitor's function and responsibility shall be to review the defendants' compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In so doing, the monitor shall consult with the plaintiffs and the defendants at the monitor's initiative or at the request of any party in order to promote efforts to facilitate compliance. The monitor may not become involved in matters that are not addressed by this Agreement. The parties recognize and agree that the failure to the defendants to implement recommendations on matters under the sole discretion of the defendants or outside the scope ofthis Agreement shall not constitute non-compliance with the Agreement. The monitor has no authority to add to or to alter the provisions ofthis Agreement.
14

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 15 of 22
5. The monitor's responsibility in determining compliance will be limited to assessing:
a. whether services listed in this Agreement have been contracted for within timeframes listed in this Agreement;
b. whether services provided are as described in this Agreement; c. whether the classmember was in detention when services were provided; d. whether training has been provided and covered areas specified in this
Agreement; e. whether the pre-adj udication protocol cited in the agreement has been
implemented; f. whether the defendants have demonstrated an increase in diversion of
classmembers from residential placement; g. whether defendants are properly tracking class members receiving services in
this Agreement to determine: 1. what services are being provided to which classmembers; 2. length of time of each service provided for each classmember; 3. costs of service per classmember;.
h. whether funding listed in this agreement has been provided to DCF; i. whether DCF has developed outcome measures and a quality assurance plan
and has provided outcome reports as described in this agreement; j. whether the defendants are screening c1assmembers and providing juvenile
justice intermediate evaluations as described in this agreement;
15

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 16 of 22
k. whether defendants have contracted with Christina Crowe and the University of Connecticut Health Center as described in this agreement;
I.. whether the defendants have prepared a plan to extend services to classmembers throughout the state as described in this Agreement;
m. whether the defendants have promulgated practices and procedures for case management for classmembers as described in this Agreement.
6. In addition, the monitor may offer advice, comments or ideas on any services, initiatives or programs described in this Agreement. To the extent the advice, comments or ideas are not within the SCOPI! of the monitor's responsibilities, they may not be the basis for any finding of noncompliance.
7. Monitoring will not include a review of the professional judgment or actions of the defendants or their employees on any particular case.
8. The defendants will prepare monthly status reports to be reviewed by the Plaintiffs and the monitor. The reports will indicate progress in implementation and expenses to date. The monitor shall file quarterly status reports with the Court, regarding the implementation of the provisions of this Agreement and meet with the parties on a quarterly basis for the first year of the agreement and semiannually thereafter. The parties will meet periodically with the Court, at the Court's request.
9. The State of Connecticut shall continue to pay Christina Crowe, mental health consultant, to complete a review of the alternative detention programs and the community detention centers to determine whether mental health services provided at these facilities are substantially similar to the services provided in the state detention centers. The parties agree that upon completion ofthis review, neither the consultant nor
16

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 17 of 22
the monitor will conduct any further such reviews, except for the purpose of determining whether any non-compliance issues found during the review havc been resolved.
10. The mental health consultant will be paid $125 per hour, including travel time and reasonable costs and expenses related to this work. The monitor will oversee this work; in the event the consultant is not able to complete her review within six months of the effective date of this agreement, the monitor may undertake this responsibility and will amend his budget to include the additional expenses anticipated.

VI. MISCELLANEOUS

1.

The plaintiffs agree that thl: defendants have substantially complied with

the Stipulated Agreement Regarding Non-Mental Health Issues dated June 24, 2002

[Non-Mental Health Agreement] and that such Agreement will no longer be in effect as

of August 12,2005.

2. Beginning January 1, 2006, the defendants shall provide outcome reports

for all services provided under Sec. IV, on a quarterly basis and will require all

contractors providing such services to submit quarterly implementation reports indicating

the number of c1assmembers receiving the service, the length of time each is in service

and the cost of the service per child. Such reports shall be submitted to the monitor and

the plaintiffs.

3. Defendants shall continue to screen classmembers and provide juvenile

justice intermediate evaluations utilizing the current screening and evaluation procedures,

unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, throughout the period of this Agreement.

17

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 18 of 22
Defendants shall maintain the current level of funding ($1,398,936) for such juvenile justice intermediate evaluations throughout the period of the Agreement.
4. Defendants shall provide ADPs and community detention centers with mental health services substantially similar to the detention centers.
5. The CSSD will continue to contract with the University of Connecticut Health Center to provide audits and quality assurance monitoring of mental health services provided in the state and community detention centers throughout the period of this Agreement.
6. By September I, 2005, the defendants will develop outcome measures for use by contractors providing services under section N of this Agreement. The plaintiffs and the monitor will have the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed outcome measures prior to the measures being finalized. The defendants have the sole discretion to determine the final outcome measures. The contracts will contain outcome measures.
7. By January 1,2006, the defendants will prepare a quality assurance plan, utilizing outcome measures, to assess the efficacy of the services provided under section IV of this agreement. The plaintiffs and the monitor will have the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed quality assurance plan prior to the plan being fmalized. The defendants have the discretion to determine the fmal quality assurance plan.
8. Utilizing the quality assurance plan, the defendants will assess and prepare reports on the efficacy of the services provided under section IV of this agreement; copies of such reports will be provided to the plaintiffs and the monitor. These reports shall not
18

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 19 of 22 be used to determine compliance with this Agreement; rather the reports will be used for informational purposes and to assist in future funding decisions.
9. Prior to any action to enforce this agreement, the plaintiffs will submit a
notice of noncompliance to the monitor. lbe monitor will have 30 days to resolve the matter, unless the parties mutually agree 011 a further extension of time. In the event the matter cannot be resolved, the plaintiff may pursue further relief through the District Court.
10. Plaintiffs shall have reasonable access to classmembers and their records. 11. This Agreement shall be a complete defense to any claim, suit or action in any forum with regard to any matter covered by this Agreement.
VII. COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES 1. Defendants shall pay to the plaintiffs reasonable costs and attorneys' fees
incurred during the period of July I, 2004 through the date of the parties' signature on this Agreement. The defendants shall not be obligated to pay any additional costs and attorneys' fees unless such fees or costs are related to reasonable activities in ensuring
19

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 20 of 22
enforcement of this Agreement and are ordered by the Court pursuant to federal law. Respectfully submitted, FOR THE PLAINTIFFS
By:~fo~'~IM~~~~__5£_·~_J_-______
Martha Stone Center for Children's Advocacy University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 (860) 570-5327 Federal Bar # 00080
Steven Schwartz Center for Public Representation 22 Green St Northampton, MA 01060 413-587-6265
Robert Fleisehner Center for Public Representation 22 Green St Northampton, MA 01060 413-587-6265
20

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 21 of 22
DEFENDANTS CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
BY: /.-"/ "]. ·C.__- - - Darlene Dunbar, Commissioner
CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
By::_~~~~~~~r---~~__
dge Joseph H. ellegrino Chief Court A ministrator
tI
FOR THE DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY GENERAL ruCHARDBLUMENTHAL
BMY~tQ:,ChaypPI~e ~
Assistant Attorney General 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06141-0120 (860) 808-5340 Federal Bar #ct05550
B~T~ Susan T. Pearlman Assistant Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 (860) 808-5480 Federal Bar #ct06338
21

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/2005 Page 22 of 22

~ ~'7 f
SO ORDERED AND APPROVED after a fairness hearing, this tiny Dfillne,

,2005.

22

 
 Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 1 of 22

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT

IDDJ ;:, - '0

.: 50

EMILY J., ET. AL.
V.
M. JODI RELL, ET. AL.

NO. 3:93CV1944 (RNC) JUNE 3, 2005

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 2 of 22

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. DEFINITION SECTION ................................................................ II. BACKGROUND .............................................................................. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS ............................................................ IV. SER'VICES ...............................,'.....................................................
V. MONITORING ......................................................................... VI. MISCELLANEOUS ........................................................................... VII. COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES .....................................

PAGE 3 5 6 9 13 17 19

2

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 3 of 22

I.

DEFINITION SECTION

As used in this Settlement Agreement (hereinafter "Agreement"), the following

terms shall have the following meaning unless specifically stated otherwise:

1. "Alternative Detention Program" means a staff secure, residential

program contracted by the Judicial Branch.

2.

"Central Placement Team" means an administrative review process by

Department of Children and Families to match children and youth with mental health

problems to appropriate residential treatmc:nt facilities and group homes, and includes the

curren! review process by the Director of Juvenile Justice, the Chief of Operations and

the Director of Behavioral Health.

3. "Community Detention Center" means a physically secure, community-

based detention facility contracted for by the Judicial Branch.

4. "DCF" means Department of Children and Families.

5. "Defendants" for purposes of this Agreement are the Chief Court

Administrator, the Executive Director of tile Court Support Services Division, the

Supervisors of the Bridgeport, New Haven, and Hartford Juvenile Detention Centers, the

Commissioner of the Department of Children and Families, the Governor of the State of

Connecticut.

6. "CSSD" is the Court Support Services Division of the judicial Branch.

7. "Flexible Funds" means discretionary funds to obtain needed services

and/or goods, as described in DCF Policy Manual.

8. "Laws ofthe State of Connecticut": consists of state constitutional

provisions, statutes, judicial decisions, Rules of Court as promulgated by or issuing from

3

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 4 of 22
the State OfCOlUlccticutjudicial, executive or legislative branches, and regulations of
administrative agencies other than those agencies party to this lawsuit. 9. Level 1.5 Group Home means an enhanced group home that is a
therapeutic, community living program intended to serve adolescents with minimal-tomoderate behavioral health disorders. While these adolescents may likely demonstrate a nced for behavioral health intervention, they will not present with serious and persistent psychiatric disorders that require a higher level of care. The group home milieu and services will provide individualized treatment and support for each adolescent's emotional problems, development of interpersonal skills, educational and pre-vocational skills and independent living skills.
10. Multidimensional Treatment Foster Care is foster care for delinquent classmembers placed, either singly or at most with another classmember or nonclassmember, in a family setting for approximately 6-9 months. MTFC families will implement a structured, individualized program for each classmember that simultaneously builds on the classmember's strengths, and sets clear rules, expectations, and limits. The MTFC parents will be supported by a multidimensional treatment foster care case manager who will coordinate the: classmember's treatment program, and provide weekly supervision and support meetings for the parents. Other components include skill-focused individual treatment for the classmember, weekly family therapy for the biological parents, frequent contact with the biological family, close monitoring of progress in school, and psychiatric consu11ationlmedication management as needed.
4

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 5 of 22
II. "State Detention Center" means one of the 3 centers located at the following addresses: 920 Broad St., Hartford, CT; 784 Fairfield Ave., Bridgeport, CT; 239 Whalley Ave., New Haven, CT.
II. BACKGROUND
I. This Agreement is made and entered into by the parties in order to resolve issues raised by the plaintiffs' class in Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time of Supplemental Order and Joint Corrective Action Plan dated July 9, 2004.
2. Plaintiffs filed an Amended Complaint, by and through their next friends, on October 25, 1993 alleging that certain conditions and practices in the Detention Centers were unlawful. The Court certified a class on January 14,1994 consisting of all youth confined in the Detention Centers at that time and who may in the future be confmed in the Detention Centers.
3. A Consent Judgment was approved by this Court on February 6, 1997 and became effective March 8,1997. On June 24, 2002, in order to acknowledge that defendants had accomplished many of the original objectives of that Consent Judgment, and in order to allow the defendants to focus on improving four main areas of the original Consent Judgment, the plaintiffs and defendants agreed to substitute a Stipulated Agreement for the original Consent Judgment entered into on February 6,1997. That Stipulated Agreement was approved by thl: Court after a fairness hearing on August 12, 2002. In addition, on June 24, 2004 the Court entered an Order for Supplemental Relief ordering the parties to, inter alia, implement a Joint Corrective Action Plan (hereinafter
5

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 6 of 22
"leAP"). The stated purpose of the lCAP was ..... to ensure that the constitutional rights
of classmembers to adequate mental health services are safeguarded, and that the Defendants' obligations thereunder are fully satisfied." JCAP at p. 2. Throughout the life of the original Consent Judgment, the Stipulated Agreement and the JCAP, the parties have worked cooperatively with a court-appointed monitor in an effort to accomplish all of the provisions contained therein. The parties recognize that the defendants have made considerable progress toward achieving the goals of the Consent Judgment, the Stipulated Agreement and the JCAP. The parties further recognize that maintaining and furthering these achievements is desirable. This Settlement Agreement is entered into with the further understanding and cooperation of all parties directed towards further improving the provisions of mental health services to classmembers.
4. The parties to this Agreement agree and represent that this Agreement is fair, reasonable, and adequate to protect the interests ofthe class in accordance with Rule 23, Fed. R. Civ. P. and also is narrowly drawn and extends no further than what is necessary and the least intrusive means to address the federal constitutional claims of the classmembers.
5. This Agreement is binding 1)n all class members and on the defendants, their successors in office, agents, and employees.
III. GENERAL PROVISIONS I. Nothing in this Agreement rihall require or permit the defendants to violate
the laws of the State of Connecticut. If there is any conflict between the defendants' obligations under this Agreement and the laws of the State of Connecticut, then the
6

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 7 of 22
defendants shall have the option of following the laws of the State of Connecticut. In the event that the defendants choose such option, the plaintiffs may opt to litigate the claims raised in this lawsuit. If the plaintiffs exercise this option, then the defendants are relieved of all obligations under this Agreement and the Agreement entered pursuant hereto shall be vacated.
2. The provisions of this Agreement are the result of lengthy and careful negotiation among all the parties. They have been agreed upon solely as a means to put a reasonable end to the issues raised in the Plaintiffs' Motion for Extension of Time of Supplemental Order and Joint Corrective Action Plan dated July 9,2004, and to avoid the costs, time and risks which would be involved for both parties. The Agreement embodies a compromise of the issues involved in this case and, while its provisions are binding on the parties herein, its provisions are not to be construed to be statements, rulings, or precedents with respect to the constitutional and other legal rights ofpersons who are parties or nonparties to this litigation in this or any other action. Each party acknowledges that it is entering into this Agreement to settle and compromise disputed claims and defenses and that entering into this Agreement should not be construed as statements, rulings, or precedents with respect to the constitutional or other legal rights of person or persons involved in any action other than members of the plaintiff class in this action.
3. The intent of the parties is to provide supplemental services to classmembers to increase the number of classmembcrs diverted from residential placements. Highest preference will be given to classmembers in detention; any
7

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 8 of 22
exceptions will require approval of the DCF chief operating officer or her designee and will be reported to the plaintiffs and the Monitor.
4. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed so as to affect or limit the authority of Connecticut courts or the Judi<:ial Branch to remand children to juvenile detention centers or the authority of DCF to place a child who is in DCF's custody.
5. The parties agree that all rights and obligations created by this Agreement shall terminate and no longer be enforceable without the need for any further order of the Court on September 30, 2007, unless otherwise ordered by the Court, based on the Court's express finding of a constitutional violation resulting from noncompliance with this Agreement.
6. Defendants shall notify all relevant staff of the provisions of this Agreement. Counsel for plaintiffs may meet with c1assmembers in each detention center, community detention center, and alternative detention program to describe its terms. Defendants shall make available copies of this Agreement to appropriate probation staff and, upon request, to counsel for any c1assmember in each detention center, community detention center, and alternative detention program.
7. The parties agree that, upon the Court's approval, this Agreement replaces the Court's Order for Supplemental Relief entered on June 24, 2002 and that the provisions ofthat Order (including the Joint Corrective Action Plan) are no longer in effect. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to prohibit the plaintiffs from bringing a new lawsuit to challenge the conditions covered by those provisions or other matters not covered by this Agreement.
8

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 9 of 22
8. Except as otherwise provided, the obligations of the state defendants to perfonn the tenns and conditions of this Agreement shall become operative upon 1) approval by the General Assembly ofthe State of Connecticut in accordance with Connecticut General Statutes Sec. 3-125a, and 2) approval by this Court pursuant to federal rules pertaining to class actions.
IV. SERVICES
The parties agree that the following new services will be provided to certain classmembers over Years 1 and 2 as defined below, to supplement the current service delivery system available to classmembers:
YEAR 1: October 1, 2005 to September 30, 2006
1. The defendants shall provide supplemental services as specified below for the period October 1, 2005 through September 30, 2006 at an estimated cost not to exceed $2,538,438.
2. No later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall contract for a minimum of 10-15 multidimensional treatment foster care slots l at an estimated cost not to exceed $433,438 per year. The contract(s) for such service shall define the service as specified in this Agreement. These slots shall be used as an alternative to treatment and placement in residential treatment facilities for such c1assmembers who are identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team, or during the CPT process, as otherwise requiring residential placement.
1 A slot is defined as a single placement
9

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 10 of 22
3. For classmembers from the City of Hartford, no later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall contract for a minimum of 14-20 multidimensional treatment fostcr care slots, at an estimated cost not to exceed $520,000 per year. These slots shall be used as an alternative to treatment and placement in residential treatment facilities for such c1assmembers who are identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team, or during the CPT process, as otherwise n,quiring residential placement.
4. For classmembers from the City of Hartford, no later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall contract for a level 1.5 group home for four to six classmembers at an estimated cost not to exceed $675,000 per year. This home shall be for such classmembers who are identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team, or during the CPT process as otherwise needing treatment and placement in a residential treatment facility, and shall be clinically staffed to meet the behavioral health needs of these classmembers.
5. For c1assmembers from the City of Hartford, no later than October 1, 2005, defendants, through DCF, shall provide identified community-based services/programs, to supplement such services and programs already in existence. The following services shall be available for those c1assmembers identified by the CSSDIDCF case review team and/or CPT process who would otherwise need treatment and placement in a residential treatment facility but for the access to such services:
a. Outpatient substance abuse treatment services at a cost not to exceed $250,000 per year for approximately 25 classmembers;
b. Flexible Funds at a cost of$100,000 per year;
10

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 11 of 22

c.

Post Multi-Systemic Therapy support and treatment services for 12

months or longer, at a cost not to exceed $230,000 per year for approximately 30 families

who have completed MST; d. Wrap-around home-based behavioral health treatment services2

developed pursuant to an individualized phm, including but not limited to trauma-

focused gender specific treatment at a cost of $200,000 per year;

e. Flexible Funds in the amount of $1 00,000 per year to help

classmembers achieve educational success.

f. Therapeutic mentors at a cost not to exceed $75,000 per year for a

minimum of 25 c1assmembers.

6. By October I, 2005, the Defendants shall provide joint specialized training

on care coordination and applying the wrap-around care coordination principles and

practices for all DCF workers, parole officers and probation officers assigned to such

c1assmembers from the City of Hartford, who have not already received such training, and no later than October 1, 2006 for such workers and officers in the remaining parts of

the state who have not already received such training. For those c1assmemhers who have

an assigned DCF child welfare social worker, the social worker shall work

collaboratively with the c1assmembers' probation officer or parole officer. When the

class member has not been committed previously to DCF as a delinquent, the probation

officer shall act as the case manager and the DCF social worker shall be responsible for

collaborating on the development of the probation treatment plan, facilitating access to

appropriate DCF services and monitoring the c1assmember's progress in treatment. In

2 The components would include comprehensive assessment, clinical support team, mobile crisis and intensive case management.
11

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 12 of 22
the c1assmember is committed to DCF as a delinquent, the parole officer shall act as the case manager, and the DCF social worker shall be responsible for collaborating on the developing of the probation or parole treatment plan, facilitating access to appropriate DCF services and monitoring the c1assmember's progress in treatment.
7. No later than October I, 2005, defendants shall develop and implement a special pre-adjudication case review proto(:ol for classmembers involved with DCF, designed to develop treatment/service plans and identify options for services and placements with the goal of reducing the number of days such classmembers spend in detention. Plaintiffs and the Monitor shall have the opportunity to comment on such protocol prior to its implementation. The plaintiffs will meet with the public defenders to review the proposed protocol and coordinate any recommendations. The defendants have the sole discretion to determine the fmal case review protocol.
8. If there is insufficient demand for the services described above, from the c1assmembers from the City of Hartford, the defendants may utilize these services for other classmembers served by the Hartford Juvenile Court.
Year 2: October 1, 2006 to September 30, 2007 9. No later than April I, 2006, defendants shall prepare a specific plan to
extend the services listed in sections 2 through 5 above to c1assmembers throughout the state who would otherwise be placed in residential treatment facilities. The plan will provide for a similar array of services for such classinembers and will have a total cost of not more than an additional $3.5 million over and above the costs for year I. The
12

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 13 of 22
plaintiffs will be given an opportunity to comment on the plan prior to its implementation.
lO. Prior to the implementation ofthe Year 2 plan, the parties shall meet with the monitor to discuss any concerns with the plan. The parties will use good faith efforts to resolve any problems, provided the total cost of such plan may not exceed $6, 083,438.3
11. The defendants, through DCF, will implement the plan as expeditiously as possible, with contracts executed by October 1, 2006. The plan may be developed with consideration of related off-sets, savings or reallocations within existing budget resources. In the event the legislature fails to appropriate adequate funding to implement the plan, the plaintiffs reserve the right to pursue appropriate judicial relief to enforce this agreement.
12. During the two-year period of this agreement, the defendants will periodically review contractor expenditures for the services listed above; if underexpenditure from the maximum amounts listed above is identified, and cannot be reasonably spent during the same fiscal year, the defendants will develop a plan to expend those funds for the benefit of classmembers, consistent with this agreement. Plaintiffs and the Monitor shall have the opportunity to comment on such plan prior to its finalization. Implementation of the plan must comply with all state law.
V. MONITORING The defendants agree to the followmg monitoring of its obligations under this
agreement:
3 Total costs includes extending Year I costs into Year 2, plus additional roll-out funding for Year 2.
13

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 14 of 22
I. The current monitor, Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. , shall monitor compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In the event that Dr. Carl is unable to continue as monitor, the parties shall mutually select his replacement. If the parties are unable to agree upon a monitor, the Court shall select a monitor from nominations provided by the parties.
2. The State of Connecticut shall pay the monitor for his services at a rate of $125 per hour, including travel time, and reasonable costs and expenses pursuant to a budget approved by the Court.
3. In perfonning his or her duties, the monitor shall have reasonable access to the detainees confmed in the state and community detention centers and alternative detention programs, the staff of such facilities, and to files, reports and documents pertaining to such detainees which are relevant to the monitor's responsibilities under this Agreement.
4. The monitor's function and responsibility shall be to review the defendants' compliance with the provisions of this Agreement. In so doing, the monitor shall consult with the plaintiffs and the defendants at the monitor's initiative or at the request of any party in order to promote efforts to facilitate compliance. The monitor may not become involved in matters that are not addressed by this Agreement. The parties recognize and agree that the failure to the defendants to implement recommendations on matters under the sole discretion of the defendants or outside the scope ofthis Agreement shall not constitute non-compliance with the Agreement. The monitor has no authority to add to or to alter the provisions ofthis Agreement.
14

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 15 of 22
5. The monitor's responsibility in determining compliance will be limited to assessing:
a. whether services listed in this Agreement have been contracted for within timeframes listed in this Agreement;
b. whether services provided are as described in this Agreement; c. whether the classmember was in detention when services were provided; d. whether training has been provided and covered areas specified in this
Agreement; e. whether the pre-adj udication protocol cited in the agreement has been
implemented; f. whether the defendants have demonstrated an increase in diversion of
classmembers from residential placement; g. whether defendants are properly tracking class members receiving services in
this Agreement to determine: 1. what services are being provided to which classmembers; 2. length of time of each service provided for each classmember; 3. costs of service per classmember;.
h. whether funding listed in this agreement has been provided to DCF; i. whether DCF has developed outcome measures and a quality assurance plan
and has provided outcome reports as described in this agreement; j. whether the defendants are screening c1assmembers and providing juvenile
justice intermediate evaluations as described in this agreement;
15

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 16 of 22
k. whether defendants have contracted with Christina Crowe and the University of Connecticut Health Center as described in this agreement;
I.. whether the defendants have prepared a plan to extend services to classmembers throughout the state as described in this Agreement;
m. whether the defendants have promulgated practices and procedures for case management for classmembers as described in this Agreement.
6. In addition, the monitor may offer advice, comments or ideas on any services, initiatives or programs described in this Agreement. To the extent the advice, comments or ideas are not within the SCOPI! of the monitor's responsibilities, they may not be the basis for any finding of noncompliance.
7. Monitoring will not include a review of the professional judgment or actions of the defendants or their employees on any particular case.
8. The defendants will prepare monthly status reports to be reviewed by the Plaintiffs and the monitor. The reports will indicate progress in implementation and expenses to date. The monitor shall file quarterly status reports with the Court, regarding the implementation of the provisions of this Agreement and meet with the parties on a quarterly basis for the first year of the agreement and semiannually thereafter. The parties will meet periodically with the Court, at the Court's request.
9. The State of Connecticut shall continue to pay Christina Crowe, mental health consultant, to complete a review of the alternative detention programs and the community detention centers to determine whether mental health services provided at these facilities are substantially similar to the services provided in the state detention centers. The parties agree that upon completion ofthis review, neither the consultant nor
16

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 17 of 22
the monitor will conduct any further such reviews, except for the purpose of determining whether any non-compliance issues found during the review havc been resolved.
10. The mental health consultant will be paid $125 per hour, including travel time and reasonable costs and expenses related to this work. The monitor will oversee this work; in the event the consultant is not able to complete her review within six months of the effective date of this agreement, the monitor may undertake this responsibility and will amend his budget to include the additional expenses anticipated.

VI. MISCELLANEOUS

1.

The plaintiffs agree that thl: defendants have substantially complied with

the Stipulated Agreement Regarding Non-Mental Health Issues dated June 24, 2002

[Non-Mental Health Agreement] and that such Agreement will no longer be in effect as

of August 12,2005.

2. Beginning January 1, 2006, the defendants shall provide outcome reports

for all services provided under Sec. IV, on a quarterly basis and will require all

contractors providing such services to submit quarterly implementation reports indicating

the number of c1assmembers receiving the service, the length of time each is in service

and the cost of the service per child. Such reports shall be submitted to the monitor and

the plaintiffs.

3. Defendants shall continue to screen classmembers and provide juvenile

justice intermediate evaluations utilizing the current screening and evaluation procedures,

unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, throughout the period of this Agreement.

17

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 18 of 22
Defendants shall maintain the current level of funding ($1,398,936) for such juvenile justice intermediate evaluations throughout the period of the Agreement.
4. Defendants shall provide ADPs and community detention centers with mental health services substantially similar to the detention centers.
5. The CSSD will continue to contract with the University of Connecticut Health Center to provide audits and quality assurance monitoring of mental health services provided in the state and community detention centers throughout the period of this Agreement.
6. By September I, 2005, the defendants will develop outcome measures for use by contractors providing services under section N of this Agreement. The plaintiffs and the monitor will have the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed outcome measures prior to the measures being finalized. The defendants have the sole discretion to determine the final outcome measures. The contracts will contain outcome measures.
7. By January 1,2006, the defendants will prepare a quality assurance plan, utilizing outcome measures, to assess the efficacy of the services provided under section IV of this agreement. The plaintiffs and the monitor will have the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed quality assurance plan prior to the plan being fmalized. The defendants have the discretion to determine the fmal quality assurance plan.
8. Utilizing the quality assurance plan, the defendants will assess and prepare reports on the efficacy of the services provided under section IV of this agreement; copies of such reports will be provided to the plaintiffs and the monitor. These reports shall not
18

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 19 of 22 be used to determine compliance with this Agreement; rather the reports will be used for informational purposes and to assist in future funding decisions.
9. Prior to any action to enforce this agreement, the plaintiffs will submit a
notice of noncompliance to the monitor. lbe monitor will have 30 days to resolve the matter, unless the parties mutually agree 011 a further extension of time. In the event the matter cannot be resolved, the plaintiff may pursue further relief through the District Court.
10. Plaintiffs shall have reasonable access to classmembers and their records. 11. This Agreement shall be a complete defense to any claim, suit or action in any forum with regard to any matter covered by this Agreement.
VII. COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES 1. Defendants shall pay to the plaintiffs reasonable costs and attorneys' fees
incurred during the period of July I, 2004 through the date of the parties' signature on this Agreement. The defendants shall not be obligated to pay any additional costs and attorneys' fees unless such fees or costs are related to reasonable activities in ensuring
19

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 20 of 22
enforcement of this Agreement and are ordered by the Court pursuant to federal law. Respectfully submitted, FOR THE PLAINTIFFS
By:~fo~'~IM~~~~__5£_·~_J_-______
Martha Stone Center for Children's Advocacy University of Connecticut School of Law 65 Elizabeth Street Hartford, CT 06105 (860) 570-5327 Federal Bar # 00080
Steven Schwartz Center for Public Representation 22 Green St Northampton, MA 01060 413-587-6265
Robert Fleisehner Center for Public Representation 22 Green St Northampton, MA 01060 413-587-6265
20

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 21 of 22
DEFENDANTS CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
BY: /.-"/ "]. ·C.__- - - Darlene Dunbar, Commissioner
CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
By::_~~~~~~~r---~~__
dge Joseph H. ellegrino Chief Court A ministrator
tI
FOR THE DEFENDANTS ATTORNEY GENERAL ruCHARDBLUMENTHAL
BMY~tQ:,ChaypPI~e ~ Assistant Attorney General 55 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06141-0120 (860) 808-5340 Federal Bar #ct05550
B~T~ Susan T. Pearlman Assistant Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 (860) 808-5480 Federal Bar #ct06338
21

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 435 Filed 10/06/05 Page 22 of 22

~ ~'7 f
SO ORDERED AND APPROVED after a fairness hearing, this tiny Dfillne,

,2005.

22

 
 Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 467 Filed 09/26/07 Page 2 of 4
MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES AND
THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT JUDICIAL BRANCH
WHEREAS, The Emily J. Settlement Agreement dated June 3, 2005, will expire on September 30,2007;and
WHEREAS, The Department of Children and Families (hereinafter DCF) and the Judicial Branch (hereinafter Judicial) recognize that many of the services, protocols, interventions, and procedures developed through the Emily J. Settlement Agreement are in the best interest of court-involved children ; and
WHEREAS, DCF and Judicial recognize that their working relationship that has developed during the course of the implementation of the Emily J. Settlement Agreement has been beneficial to DCF and Judicial and to the interests of court-involved children;
THEREFORE, in order to continue to promote the interests of court-involved children DCF and Judicial agree, subject to the right to terminate or extend this Agreement as set forth below, to continue the following through September 30, 2009:
DCF will continue to provide a liaison to each of the state-operated Juvenile Detention Centers. The liaisons will facilitate information-sharing between the DCF area offices, the Detention Centers and the Juvenile Probation offices. The liaisons will continue to screen all detention admissions for DCF involvement, notify area offices of DCF-involved children admitted to detention, ensure that area office triage meetings occur for DCF-involved children, and provide information on DCF services to Detention and Probation staff and other court personnel. Judicial will continue to provide office space, access to equipment and, as allowed by law, client information.
DCF will continue to hold triage planning meetings for all DCF-involved children admitted to detention, will develop service plans as appropriate, and will provide detention release service recommendations to the child's probation officer for presentation to the Court. Judicial, through its Juvenile Probation Officers, will present DCF detention release service plans to the court at detention hearings
DCF and Judicial will continue to jointly consider and develop, as appropriate, community-based treatment plans through the Case Review Team (CRT) process or as part of the Child and Adolescent Needs And Strengths (CANS) residential planning process, in order to divert detained children determined to be at imminent risk for residential treatment into appropriate community-based services.
Additionally, Judicial and DCF will develop and implement a second-level CRT for children in detention for whom a residential treatment match has not been found after 45 days or when the child was matched by the CRT but 45 days have elapsed since the match and placement has still not occurred. This second level CRT will be convened with the original CRT and with a senior level representative(s) with some clinical expertise from DCF and/or Judicial.

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 467 Filed 09/26/07 Page 3 of 4
DCF will continue to fund the services and flexible funds as described in the Settlement Agreement, based on funding availability and service effectiveness. If, during the term of this agreement, any services are determined not to be effective, DCF may terminate specific contracts and reallocate any funds to other services or programs that benefit detention-involved children at risk for residential treatment. DCF will seek Judicial's agreement on the reallocation of any funds to other services or programs.
Further, within available resources, DCF will provide, or arrange for, additional technical assistance to the MTFC provider in order to expedite the development and expand the utilization of treatment foster care beds statewide. DCF will authorize the MTFC provider to immediately hire staff for Team 3 for the Bridgeport area.
DCF and Judicial will continue the current practice of assigning management level staff members to oversee and coordinate the services, protocols and procedures outlined in this memorandum. Both agencies will continue to support local coordination and service-planning by the DCF area offices, the local probation offices, the detention centers, providers and community stakeholders.
DCF will continue to fund a quality assurance project through the University of Connecticut Health Center through June 2008 and if funds permit, either DCF or Judicial may continue this project beyond that date. DCF and Judicial will continue to monitor service utilization and effectiveness, and rates of triage and diversion for detention-involved children. Contracted providers and agency staff will continue to submit utilization and/or program reports on a monthly basis to DCF and Judicial management staff, as required, and DCF and Judicial staff will continue to aggregate and analyze these data.
DCF and Judicial will jointly establish a Diversion Review Committee (DRC) that will meet quarterly to review overall progress in diverting detained children from residential treatment, through the review of aggregate data, and will make recommendations regarding any systemic or programmatic impediments to diversion. The DRC will be provided with such written reports, generated through the quality assurance project, as are necessary for it to conduct its review. A representative from the Center for Children's Advocacy will be invited to join this committee.
DCF and Judicial will conduct periodic training and retraining for all probation supervisors and adolescent treatment supervisors and voluntary services supervisors in regard to the availability and efficacy of community-based services and flex funds to maintain class members in their communities.
DCF and Judicial agree to work cooperatively to develop, request, and advocate for budget appropriations to advance the purposes of the MOA as deemed necessary by DCF and Judicial.
This agreement may be cancelled by DCF or Judicial upon (90) ninety days written notice, or may be extended or otherwise modified by the written agreement of both DCF and Judicial.

Case 3:93-cv-01944-RNC Document 467 Filed 09/26/07 Page 4 of 4

AGREED:
DATE: cl} 7-/ o}: I I

STATE OF CONNECTICUT, DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES
BY: ~ __£- fl._1 . 1~/I .
SUSAN HAMILTON, M W, JD COMMISSIONER

DATE:_ ___._J~-'--;_11_/_t_lf'--;__

STATE OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL BRANCH LEGAL SERVICES APPROVED AS TO FORM

~~~ BY:

~ I

''t/ :t-, ~

~~. '

~,,

MARTIN R. LIBBIN

DEPUTY DIRECTOR

STATE OF CONNECTICUT, JUDICIAL BRANCH

BARBARAM.Q DEPUTY CHIEF COURT ADMINISTRATOR

 
 Emily J. v. Weicker JI-CT-001-002

of fflumtrrttrtrt
DIVISION OF PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES

OFFICE DF PUBLIC DEFENDER
SUPERIOR COURT, JUVENILE MATTERS 7 8 2 FAIRFIELD AVE.
BRIDGEPORT, CT. 0 6 6 0 4

GEORGE R. DLEYER, ESQ.
PUBLIC DEFENDER 579-6599 579-6279

October 13, 1993

Professor Michael Dale Nova Law Center 3305 College Avenue Ft. Lauderdale, Florida

33314

Dear Mike,

Enclosed please find a copy of the complaint in Emily J. v. Weicker (as amended complaint will be filed shortly). Also enclosed please find brief and reply brief in In re Manuel R., 207 Conn. 725, 543 A.2d 719 (1988) which covers at least the ancient history of waiver of counsel.

Thanks so much for your thoughts and whatever you forward. I'll be back in touch and feel sure Martha Stone will be as well. Best regards.

sirmserely,

GRO/ef Enclosures

. Oleyer

 
 Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 1 of 49
CLOSED,DFM
U.S. District Court United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (New Haven)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:93−cv−01944−RNC

J., et al v. Weicker, et al Assigned to: Judge Robert N. Chatigny Demand: $0 Case in other court: 02−07311(L),02−07319(Con) Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 09/27/1993 Date Terminated: 02/06/1997 Jury Demand: None Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Emily J. A Minor, by & through her next friend, Mary J.

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht Jerome N. Frank Legal Services Organization Yale Law School PO Box 209090 New Haven, CT 06520−9090 203−432−4800 Fax: 203−432−1426 Email: carroll.lucht@yale.edu LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jonel Newman Connecticut Civil Liberties Union Foundation 32 Grand St. Hartford, CT 06106 860−247−9823 TERMINATED: 01/23/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Stone Center for Children's Advocacy, Inc 65 Elizabeth St. Hartford, CT 06105−2290 860−570−5327 Fax: 860−570−5256 Email: mstone@kidscounsel.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven J. Schwartz Center for Public Representation 22 Green Street Northhampton, MA 01060 413−586−6024 Email: sschwartz@cpr−ma.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
William R. A Minor, by & through his next friend, Sandra R.

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jonel Newman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/23/1997

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 2 of 49

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Stone (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven J. Schwartz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Matt A. A Minor, by & through his next friend, Rosemary A.

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jonel Newman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/23/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Stone (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven J. Schwartz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Ramon C. A Minor, by & through his next friend, Maria C.

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jonel Newman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/23/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Stone (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven J. Schwartz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Michael T. A Minor, by & through his next friend, Denise T.

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 3 of 49

Jonel Newman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/23/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Stone (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven J. Schwartz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Mark B. A Minor, by & through his next friend, Anna B.

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jonel Newman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/23/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Stone (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven J. Schwartz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Paul M. A Minor, by & through his next friend, Barbara M.

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jonel Newman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/23/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Stone (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven J. Schwartz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Ricardo M. a minor, by and through his next friend,

represented by Carroll Lee Lucht (See above for address)

Nel K.

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 4 of 49
LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jonel Newman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/23/1997 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Martha Stone (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Steven J. Schwartz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
Lowell P. Weicker, Jr. In his official capacity only

represented by John R. Whelan Attorney General's Office Education/Dmr Dept. 110 Sherman St., Po Box 120 Hartford, CT 06105 860−566−7173 TERMINATED: 05/13/1994 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Margaret Q. Chapple Attorney General's Office Employment Rights 55 Elm St., PO Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141−0120 860−808−5315 Fax: 860−808−5383 Email: margaret.chapple@ct.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Mark F. Kohler State of Connecticut, Office of the Attorney General 55 Elm Street PO Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141 860−808−5177 Fax: 860−808−5347 Email: mark.kohler@ct.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Martha Watts Prestley Shipman & Goodwin One American Row Hartford, CT 06103−2819 860−251−5000 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Michael J. Besso

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 5 of 49

Attorney General's Office − Sherman St (Htfd) 110 Sherman St. Hartford, CT 06105 860−808−5450 Fax: 860−808−5595 Email: michael.besso@ct.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban Attorney General's Office −Elm Htfd 55 Elm Street P.O. Box 120 Hartford, CT 06141 860−808−5210 Fax: 860−808−5385 Email: ralph.urban@ct.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley Bendett & McHugh, P.C. 160 Farmington Ave. Farmington, CT 06032 860−255−5007 Fax: 860−677−4549 TERMINATED: 03/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Stephen J. O'Neill Attorney General's Office Public Safety & Special Revenue MacKenzie Hall, 110 Sherman St. Hartford, CT 06105 860−808−5450 TERMINATED: 04/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom Office of the Attorney General 110 Sherman Street Hartford, CT 06105 860−808−5450 Fax: 860−808−5591 Email: steven.strom@ct.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Aaron Ment, Jr. In his official capacity as Chief COurt Administrator of Superior Court, State of CT

represented by John R. Whelan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/13/1994 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Watts Prestley

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 6 of 49

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 03/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Stephen J. O'Neill (See above for address) TERMINATED: 04/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Anthony J. Salius In his official capacity as Director, Family Division, Superior Court, State of CT TERMINATED: 02/14/2002

represented by John R. Whelan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/13/1994 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/14/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Watts Prestley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/14/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/14/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/14/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley (See above for address)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 7 of 49

TERMINATED: 02/14/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Stephen J. O'Neill (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/14/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/14/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Peter Dobson In his official capacity as Supervisor, Bridgeport Juvenile Detention Center

represented by John R. Whelan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/13/1994 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Watts Prestley (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 03/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Stephen J. O'Neill (See above for address) TERMINATED: 04/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Donald Konefal In his official capacity as Supervisor, New Haven Juvenile Detention Center

represented by John R. Whelan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/13/1994

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 8 of 49

TERMINATED: 02/20/2002

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Watts Prestley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Stephen J. O'Neill (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Mark Guasta In his official capacity as Supervisor, Hartford Juvenile Detention Center TERMINATED: 02/20/2002

represented by John R. Whelan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/13/1994 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Watts Prestley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 9 of 49

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Stephen J. O'Neill (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom (See above for address) TERMINATED: 02/20/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Rose Alma Senatore in her official capacity as Commissioner, Dept of Children & Families, State of CT

represented by John R. Whelan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/13/1994 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Mark F. Kohler (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Watts Prestley (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley (See above for address)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 10 of 49

TERMINATED: 03/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Stephen J. O'Neill (See above for address) TERMINATED: 04/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Susan T. Pearlman Attorney General's Office Child Protection MacKenzie Hall, 110 Sherman St. Room 305 Hartford, CT 06105 860−808−6480 Email: susan.pearlman@po.state.ct.us LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Commissioner Vincent Ferrandino In his official capacity as Commissioner, Dept of Education, State of CT

represented by John R. Whelan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/13/1994 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Mark F. Kohler (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Martha Watts Prestley (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Ralph E. Urban (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sharon M. Hartley (See above for address) TERMINATED: 03/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 11 of 49

Stephen J. O'Neill (See above for address) TERMINATED: 04/05/2002 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
T. Josiha Haig In his official capacity as Superintendent of Schools, City of Hartford

represented by James J. Szerejko Halloran & Sage One Goodwin Sq., 225 Asylum St. Hartford, CT 06103 860−297−4658 Fax: 860−548−0006 Email: szerejko@halloran−sage.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Gustafson U.S. Attorney's Office−NH 157 Church St., 25rd floor New Haven, CT 06510 203−821−3700 Fax: 203−773−5376 Email: mike.gustafson@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Terrence M. O'Neill Attorney General's Office 110 Sherman St. Hartford, CT 06105 860−808−5450 Fax: 860−808−5591 Email: terrence.oneill@ct.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Thomas P. O'Dea , Jr. Diserio Martin O'Connor & Castiglioni, LLP One Atlantic Street Stamford, CT 06901 203−358−0800 Fax: 203−348−2321 Email: todea@dmoc.com TERMINATED: 07/30/2007 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 12 of 49

Defendant
James A. Connelly In his official capacity as Superintent of Schools, City of Bridgeport

represented by Jeffrey J. Mirman Hinckley, Allen & Snyder, LLP 20 Church Street, 18th Floor Hartford, CT 06103 860−331−2762 Fax: 860−278−3802 Email: jmirman@haslaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

John F. Droney , Jr. Hinckley, Allen & Snyder LLP 20 Church Street 18th Floor Hartford, CT 06103 860−725−6200 Fax: 860−278−3802 Email: jdroney@haslaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Laurann Asklof Shipman & Goodwin −ConstPlza−Htfd One Constitution Plaza 18th Floor Hartford, CT 06103−1919 860−251−5000 Fax: 860−251−5218 Email: lasklof@goodwin.com TERMINATED: 06/28/1995 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Lisa A. Zaccardelli Hinckley Allen Snyder LLP−Htfd 20 Church St. Hartford, CT 06103 860−331−2764 Fax: 860−278−3802 Email: lzaccardelli@hinckleyallen.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Reginald Mayo In his official capacity as Superintendent of Schools, City of New Haven

represented by Ann−Marie DeGraffenreidt New Haven Bd of Ed Gateway Center 54 Meadow St. New Haven, CT 06519 203−946−8888 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

George B. Wilkinson , III

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 13 of 49

450 Columbus Blvd. Hartford, CT 06115 860−277−4170 TERMINATED: 08/29/1995 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Margaret Q. Chapple (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michael J. Besso (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Wendi J. Kemp McCarter & English Cityplace I 185 Asylum St. 36th Fl. Hartford, CT 06103−3495 860−275−6744 Email: wkemp@mccarter.com TERMINATED: 05/31/2006 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

William H. Narwold Motley Rice LLC One Corporate Ctr., 17th Fl. 20 Church St. Hartford, CT 06103 860−882−1676 Fax: 860−882−1682 Email: bnarwold@motleyrice.com TERMINATED: 04/22/2004 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant
Leo C. Arnone Official Capacity

represented by Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant Leonard Barbieri

represented by Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Defendant Warden David May

represented by Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Notice
US Court of Appeals TERMINATED: 11/12/2004

represented by US Court of Appeals Office of the Clerk

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 14 of 49

US Courthouse Foley Square New York, NY 10007 212−857−8500 TERMINATED: 11/12/2004 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant Warden David May

represented by Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant Leonard Barbieri

represented by Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant Peter Dobson

represented by Steven R. Strom (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant
Cynthia K. Swienton Honorable

represented by James K. Robertson , Jr. Carmody Torrance Sandak & Hennessey, LLP − NH 195 Church St. 18th floor PO Box 1950 New Haven, CT 06510−1950 203−575−2636 Email: jrobertson@carmodylaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Mark F. Kohler (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant
Michael Mack Honorable

represented by James K. Robertson , Jr. (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Mark F. Kohler (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 09/27/1993
09/27/1993

# Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT Filing Fee $ 120.00 Receipt # 135692 (Former Employee) (Entered: 09/28/1993)
SUMMONS(ES) issued for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 15 of 49

09/27/1993 09/27/1993 09/27/1993 09/30/1993 09/30/1993 09/30/1993 09/30/1993
10/01/1993 10/04/1993 10/05/1993 10/07/1993 10/07/1993 10/15/1993
10/15/1993
10/15/1993 10/18/1993

Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo (Former Employee) (Entered: 09/28/1993)
2 ORDER on Pretrial Deadlines handed to counsel. Discovery cutoff 3/29/94 ; Dispositive Motions due 5/5/94 Amended Pleadings due 12/7/93 Motions to Dismiss due 1/7/94 (Former Employee) (Entered: 09/28/1993)
3 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M. for permission to prosecute suit in ficitious name (Former Employee) (Entered: 09/28/1993)
4 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M. for Class Certification (Brief Due 10/18/93 ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 09/28/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [3−1] motion for permission to prosecute suit in ficitious name ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
ENDORSEMENT denying w/o prej [4−1] motion for Class Certification ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
5 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo 9/28/93 Answer due on 10/18/93 for Reginald Mayo, for James A. Connelly (Former Employee) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
6 SUMMONS Returned Executed as to Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino 9/27/93 Answer due on 10/18/93 for T. Josiha Haig, for Vincent Ferrandino, for Rose Alma Senatore, for Mark Guasta, for Donald Konefal, for Peter Dobson, for Anthony J. Salius, for Aaron Ment Jr., for Lowell P. Weicker Jr. (Former Employee) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
7 MEMORANDUM by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M. in support of [4−1] motion for Class Certification by plaintiffs (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/01/1993)
ENDORSEMENT vacating [0−0] order, re: [4−1] motion for Class Certification ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/04/1993)
8 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino −− Steven R. Strom (Johnson, D.) (Entered: 10/05/1993)
9 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino −− John R. Whelan (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
10 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino −− Sharon M. Hartley (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
11 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino for Disclosure of Pltfs' True Names , and for Protective Order (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/18/1993)
12 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time by two weeks to respond to pltfs' mtn for class certification (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/18/1993)
13 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time until 11/4/93 to file a responsive pleading (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/18/1993)
14 APPEARANCE of Attorney for James A. Connelly −− Jeffrey J. Mirman (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/18/1993)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 16 of 49

10/18/1993 10/19/1993 10/19/1993 10/19/1993 10/20/1993
10/22/1993 10/22/1993
10/25/1993
10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/28/1993 10/28/1993 11/02/1993 11/03/1993
11/05/1993

15 APPEARANCE of Attorney for James A. Connelly −− John F. Droney Jr. (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/18/1993)
16 MOTION by James A. Connelly to Extend Time until 11/10/93 to respond to pltfs' mtn for class certification (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/19/1993)
17 MOTION by James A. Connelly to Extend Time until 11/10/93 to respond to pltfs' mtn for permission to prosecute suit in fictitious namt (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/19/1993)
18 MOTION by James A. Connelly to Extend Time until 11/8/93 to reespond to complaint (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/19/1993)
ENDORSEMENT [13−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/4/93 to file a responsive pleading ordered accordingly, reset Answer deadline to 11/4/93 for Vincent Ferrandino, for Rose Alma Senatore, for Mark Guasta, for Donald Konefal, for Peter Dobson, for Anthony J. Salius, for Aaron Ment Jr., for Lowell P. Weicker Jr. ( signed by Clerk ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/21/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [17−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/10/93 to respond to pltfs' mtn for permission to prosecute suit in fictitious namt ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/25/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [16−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/10/93 to respond to pltfs' mtn for class certification, Brief Deadline set for 11/10/93 [4−1] motion for Class Certification ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/25/1993)
19 AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M. against Ricardo M. due 11/4/93 for Reginald Mayo, for James A. Connelly, for Josiha Haig, for Vincent Ferrandino, for Rose Alma for Mark Guasta, for Donald Konefal, for Peter Dobson, for Anthony J. Salius, for Aaron Ment Jr., for Lowell P. Jr. ) amending [1−1] complaint (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
20 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Reginald Mayo −− William H. Narwold (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
21 MOTION by Reginald Mayo to Extend Time until 11/15/93 in which it has to answer or otherwise respond (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [18−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/8/93 to reespond to complaint, Answer deadline to 11/8/93 for James A. Connelly ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [12−1] motion to Extend Time by two weeks to respond to pltfs' mtn for class certification ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
22 APPEARANCE of Attorney for T. Josiha Haig −− James J. Szerejko (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/28/1993)
23 MOTION by T. Josiha Haig to Extend Time until 11/29/93 for answering or otherwise responding (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/28/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [23−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/29/93 for answering or otherwise responding, reset Answer deadline to 11/29/93 for T. Josiha Haig ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/03/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [21−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/15/93 in which it has to answer or otherwise respond, reset Answer deadline to 11/15/93 for Reginald Mayo ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/03/1993)
24 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time until 11/15/93 within which to file their opp and/or resp memo regarding pltf motion for class certification (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/08/1993)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 17 of 49

11/08/1993
11/10/1993
11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/15/1993
11/15/1993 11/15/1993
11/16/1993 11/18/1993 11/29/1993 11/29/1993 11/29/1993 11/29/1993 11/30/1993
12/02/1993 12/03/1993
12/03/1993

25 MEMORANDUM by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. in opposition to [11−1] motion for Disclosure of Pltfs' True Names by defendantsssssss, [11−2] motion for Protective Order by defendantsssssss (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [24−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/15/93 within which to file their opp and/or resp memo regarding pltf motion for class certification, Brief Deadline set for 11/15/93 [4−1] motion for Class Certification ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
26 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Reginald Mayo −− George B. Wilkinson III (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
27 MOTION by Reginald Mayo to Extend Time to answer up to and including 11/29/93 (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
28 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino for Leave to File Reply in Response to Pltfs' Me morandum of law in opp to defts' proposed protective order (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/16/1993)
29 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time until 12/6/93 to file a responsive pleading (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/16/1993)
30 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time by two weeks to respond to pltfs' mtn for class certification (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/16/1993)
31 MOTION by James A. Connelly to Extend Time until 11/29/93 with in which to respond to amended complaint dated 10/25/93 (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/16/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [27−1] motion to Extend Time to answer up to and including 11/29/93 ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/19/1993)
32 MOTION by Reginald Mayo to Extend Time to answer or otherwise respond to amended complaint for class certification (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/30/1993)
33 ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint by James A. Connelly (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/30/1993)
34 APPEARANCE of Attorney for T. Josiha Haig −− Terrance M. O'Neill (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/30/1993)
35 MOTION by T. Josiha Haig to Extend Time until 12/29/93 to respond to complaint (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 11/30/1993)
36 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time until 1/3/94 to respond and/or obj to interrog & req for prod (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 12/01/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting to and including 12/29/93 [35−1] motion to Extend Time until 12/29/93 to respond to complaint ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/03/1993)
ENDORSEMENT denying as moot [28−1] motion for Leave to File Reply in Response to Pltfs' Me morandum of law in opp to defts' proposed protective order ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) Modified on 12/06/1993 (Entered: 12/06/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [29−1] motion to Extend Time until 12/6/93 to file a responsive pleading ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/06/1993)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 18 of 49

12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/03/1993
12/06/1993
12/06/1993
12/06/1993
12/08/1993 12/09/1993 12/09/1993 12/10/1993 12/17/1993 12/17/1993 12/17/1993 12/17/1993

ENDORSEMENT granting [30−1] motion to Extend Time by two weeks to respond to pltfs' mtn for class certification ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/06/1993)
ENDORSEMENT denying as moot [31−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/29/93 with in which to respond to amended complaint 10/25/93 ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/06/1993)
40 ORDER of Transfer ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) to Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/07/1993)
Consolidated Member Case . Lead Case Number: 2:80CV506 (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/07/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [11−1] motion for Disclosure of Pltfs' True Names, granting [11−2] motion for Protective Order ( signed by Judge Alfred V. Covello ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/09/1993)
42 PROTECTIVE ORDER: pltfs counsel shall disclose the true names of the named pltfs in this action to counsel representing the defts in this action. Names & personally−identifiable info re children obtained by pltfs & disc through disc shall be disclosed only to counsel of the parties herein. SEE for further details. (signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/09/1993)
37 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time until 12/16/93 to file a resonsive pleading (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/06/1993)
38 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time two weeks after the disclosure of the true names of the plaintiffs within which to respond to plaintiffs' motion for class certification (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/07/1993)
39 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time to file their memorandum in support of their motion to compel disclosure of the true names of the plaintiffs under the terms of the defendants' protective order on or before 12/16/93 (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/07/1993)
41 MOTION by Reginald Mayo to Extend Time until 1/7/94 to respond and/or object to plaintiffs' first set of interrogastories and requests for production of documents (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
43 ANSWER affirmative defenses to Complaint by Reginald Mayo (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/09/1993)
44 MOTION by T. Josiha Haig to Extend Time until 1/10/94 to respond to interrog & req for prod (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 12/09/1993)
45 MOTION by Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time to respond to pltfs' discovery dated 11/9/93 (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/10/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting nunc pro tunc [32−1] motion to Extend Time to answer or otherwise respond to amended complaint for class certification, to 12/13/93 ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/17/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [37−1] motion to Extend Time until 12/16/93 to file a resonsive pleading ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/17/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [36−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/3/94 to respond and/or obj to interrog & req for prod ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/17/1993)
46 MOTION by Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time to 1/18/94 to respond to complaint (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/20/1993)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 19 of 49

12/17/1993 12/20/1993 12/22/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993
12/27/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993
12/30/1993 12/30/1993 12/30/1993

47 MOTION by Rose Alma Senatore to Extend Time to respond and or object to plaintiffs' 2nd set of interrogatories and requests for production to 1/18/94 (Graham, T.) (Entered: 12/23/1993)
48 ANSWER by T. Josiha Haig to amended complaint (Graham, T.) (Entered: 12/23/1993)
49 NOTICE of filing of Commissioner Vincent Ferrandino's response to plaintiffs' first set of interrogatories and requests for production of documents to defendants Ferrandino, Haig, Connelly and Mayo (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [44−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/12/94 to respond to interrog & req for prod ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [45−1] motion to Extend Time to respond to pltfs' discoveryi, by 1/12/94 ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [47−1] motion to Extend Time to respond and or object to plaintiffs' 2nd set of interrogatories and requests for production to 1/30/94 ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [46−1] motion to Extend Time to 1/30 /94 to respond to complaint ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting, over objection, [41−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/12/94 to respond and/or object to plaintiffs' first set of interrogastories and requests for production of documents signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
ENDORSEMENT denying as moot, [39−1] motion to Extend Time to file their memorandum in support of their motion to compel disclosure of the true names of the plaintiffs under the terms of the defendants' protective order on or before 12/16/93. SEE order entered 12/1/93 #42. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
ENDORSEMENT granting [38−1] motion to Extend Time to respond to plaintiffs' motion for class certification. Defts shall respond by 1/12/94 Brief Deadline set for 1/12/94 [4−1] motion for Class Certification ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 12/27/1993)
61 OBJECTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. re: [37−1] motion to Extend Time until 12/16/93 to file a resonsive pleading by defendants (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/21/1994)
62 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. for inspection of Juvenile Detention Centers (JDCs) in Hartford, Bridgeport and New Haven (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/21/1994)
63 OBJECTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. re: [44−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/10/94 to respond to interrog & req for prod by T. Josiha Haig, [41−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/7/94 to respond and/or object to plaintiffs' first set of interrogastories and requests for production of documents by Reginald Mayo (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/21/1994)
50 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino −− Stephen J. O'Neill (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/03/1994)
51 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. to Extend Time re Req for Prod, to 3/4/94 (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/03/1994)
64 RESPONSE by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo to [62−1] motion for inspection of Juvenile Detention Centers (JDCs) in Hartford, Bridgeport and New Haven by

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 20 of 49

01/03/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/06/1994
01/06/1994 01/11/1994 01/12/1994 01/12/1994 01/12/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/18/1994
01/31/1994 02/02/1994 02/02/1994 02/02/1994

plaintiffsssssss (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/21/1994)
54 MOTION by James A. Connelly to Extend Time, to 1/12/94 for discovery (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
53 APPEARANCE of Attorney for James A. Connelly −− Lisa A. Labella (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
Status Conference held ( JAC) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
65 OBJECTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. re: [51−1] motion to Extend Time re Req for Prod, to 3/4/94 by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/21/1994)
52 SCHEDULING ORDER: Defts to respond to Class Cert motion by 1/12/94. Defts to respond to all pending disc matters by 1/31/194. Status conf to be held on 1/14/94 & 2/28/94 @ 9:30. Parties shall submit a status report to be delivered to chambers by 1/13/94 & 2/24/94. Parties shall make a good faith effort to define the class for purposes of class cert by the 1/14/94 status conf. SEE for further details. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/06/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [51−1] motion to Extend Time re Req for Prod, in accordance w/colloquy w/counsel on the record in open court at a hrg held on 1/5/94. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/06/1994)
55 ORDER referring case to Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis for the purpose of settlement conference (signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/12/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [54−1] motion to Extend Time, to 1/18/94 to respond to interrogs & prod ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/12/1994)
56 RESPONSE by Defts to [4−1] motion for Class Certification by plaintiffssssss (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
57 APPEARANCE of Attorney for T. Josiha Haig −− Michael J. Gustafson (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/14/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [4−1] motion for Class Certification at a hrg held on notice and on the record today, abs obj. SEE order re: Class Certification ordered today. signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
58 ORDER granting [4−1] motion for Class Certification. SEE for details. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
59 ORDER re copies to JGM for duration of her involvement. ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
60 AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER: 1. proposed forms of order re Class Cert. by 1/18/94, notice of consent for inspection & inspection all in accordance w/colloquy w/counsel at hrg 1/14/94. 2. response to pltfs' proposed orders and any alt. form by 2/2/94. 3. Pltfs shall reply by 2/7/94. 4. Status conf 2/28/94 @ 9:30. 5. Status report by 2/24/94. SEE for further details. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
66 ANSWER by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to amended complaint (Graham, T.) (Entered: 02/02/1994)
67 MOTION by Defendants for Protective Order re: Inspections, Photograhps & Interviews (Brief Due 2/23/94 ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/03/1994)
68 MEMORANDUM by Defendants in support of [67−1] motion for Protective Order re: Inspections, Photograhps & Interviews by Defendants (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/03/1994)
69 AFFIDAVIT of John Chapman by Defendants Re [67−1] motion for Protective Order re: Inspections, Photograhps & Interviews by Defendants (Jefferson, V.) (Entered:

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 21 of 49

02/02/1994 02/02/1994 02/02/1994 02/03/1994 02/03/1994 02/04/1994
02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/08/1994 02/08/1994 02/08/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994
02/09/1994 02/09/1994
02/09/1994 02/09/1994

02/03/1994)
73 OBJECTION by Reginald Mayo re: [60−1] Scheduling order (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 02/07/1994)
74 MEMORANDUM by Reginald Mayo in support of [73−1] objection by Reginald Mayo re: [60−1] Scheduling order (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 02/07/1994)
78 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. to Extend Time until 3/4/94, within which to respond to state dfts int/req for prod (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
70 MEMORANDUM by James A. Connelly in opposition to [62−1] motion for inspection of Juvenile Detention Centers (JDCs) in Hartford, Bridgeport and New Haven by plaintiffsssssss (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/04/1994)
71 OBJECTION by James A. Connelly re: [4−1] motion for Class Certification by plaintiffs (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/04/1994)
72 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time to file objections to proposed order re: inspections (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/04/1994)
75 AFFIDAVIT of David Konefal by Vincent Ferrandino (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/07/1994)
76 AFFIDAVIT of Walter Anyan by Vincent Ferrandino (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/07/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [72−1] motion to Extend Time to file objections to proposed order re: inspections. Clerk shall docket the accompanying document. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
77 OBJECTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. re: [67−1] motion for Protective Order re: Inspections, Photograhps & Interviews by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [78−1] motion to Extend Time until 3/7/94, within which to respond to state dfts int/req for prod ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
79 Response/Reply to [77−1] objection by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
80 Response to defts' propsed roder and memorandum insuport of defts' proposed order of notice by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
81 ORDER Directing Notice of Pendency of Class Action. Original Legal Notice to be pubished and original notice of objection mailed to counsel. SEE Order for details. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
82 ORDER granting [62−1] motion for inspection of Juvenile Detention Centers (JDCs) in Hartford, Bridgeport and New Haven. SEE Order for details on how the inspection process is to be conducted. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
83 PROTECTIVE ORDER. RE: Juvenile Detention Center (JDC) (signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [67−1] motion for Protective Order re: Inspections, Photograhps & Interviews. SEE protective order entered today. [83−1] for details. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 22 of 49

02/09/1994
02/09/1994
02/09/1994
02/09/1994
02/09/1994 02/09/1994
02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/10/1994

ENDORSEMENT. OVERRULING in part, and SUSTAINING in part [71−1] objection. SEE Order [81−1] Re: Inspections' Order Directing Notice of Pendency of Class Action; Legal Notice; and Protective Order, each signed and entered today. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT overruling in part and sustaining in part [73−1] objection. SEE Order [81−1] Re: Inspections; Order Directing Notice of Pendency of Class Action; Legal Notice; and Protective Order, each signed and entered today. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT overruling in part and sustaining in part [77−1] objection. See Order [81−1] Re: Inspections; Order Directing Notice of Pendency of Class Action; Legal Notice; and Protective Order, each signed and entered today. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
84 LETTER dated 1/18/94 by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. Re: Pltf's revised proposed orders re: inspections, directing notice of pendency of class action, and our proposed notice. (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT [84−1] letter. The Clerk shall docket this letter. Ordered accordingly ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
85 LETTER dated 1/19/94 by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo. RE: Notice of Distribution. (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT [85−1] letter. The Clerk shall docket this letter. Ordered according ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
86 LETTER dated 1/19/94 by James A. Connelly RE: Appropriate consent re: inspection of records, conduct of interviews and the class action. (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT [86−1] letter. The Clerk shall docket this letter. Ordered accordingly ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
87 LETTER dated 2/1/94 by Reginald Mayo. RE: Objection to pltfs revised proposed order and memsup of dft Mayo's obj to pltf proposed orders. (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT [87−1] letter. The Clerk shall docket this letter. Ordered accordingly ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
88 LETTER dated 2/1/94 by T. Josiha Haig RE: Proposed Order regarding inspections of JDC (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT [88−1] letter. The Clerk shall docket this letter. Ordered accordingly ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
89 LETTER dated 2/2/94 by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Re: Alternative orders regarding giving notice to the class and dfts proposed order and protective order re: inspections of JDCs. (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT [89−1] letter. The Clerk shall docket this letter. Ordered accordingly ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [62−1] motion for inspection of Juvenile Detention Centers (JDCs) in Hartford, Bridgeport and New Haven. SEE Order Re: Inspections entered 2/9/94. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/14/1994)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 23 of 49

02/10/1994 02/11/1994
02/17/1994 02/17/1994
02/23/1994 02/23/1994 02/24/1994 02/24/1994 02/28/1994
03/03/1994 03/03/1994 03/07/1994
03/11/1994 03/15/1994
03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994

90 AFFIDAVIT of Anthony Salius by Anthony J. Salius Re [89−1] letter by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. (Lopez, B.) (Entered: 02/17/1994)
ENDORSEMENT. Treating [64−1] Dft's Response to pltfs motion for inspections as an objection to the orders proposed by the pltfs, the objection is OVERRULED in part and SUSTAINED in part. SEE, inter alia, Order Re: Inspections entered 2/9/94. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/14/1994)
91 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino for Protective Order re: Interviews w/JDC Staff (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
92 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino to Extend Time and modification re: Order directing Notice of Pendency of Class Action (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
93 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. to Continue Status Conference scheduled for 2/28/94 (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/01/1994)
94 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. to Stay Discovery (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/01/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [92−1] motion to Extend Time and modification re: Order directing Notice of Pendency of Class Action ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/25/1994)
95 OBJECTION by Emily J. re: [91−1] motion for Protective Order re: Interviews w/JDC Staff by defendants (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/01/1994)
ENDORSEMENT denying as moot, [91−1] motion for Protective Order re: Interviews w/JDC Staff, in accordance w/representations of counsel to chambers in a tele call on 2/25/94. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 02/28/1994)
96 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. for Order re Production of Records (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/04/1994)
97 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. to Seal true names of pltfs & their authorized representatives (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/04/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [93−1] motion to Continue Status Conference scheduled for 2/28/94. A status conf & hrg on all pending matters shall be held on 3/22/94 @ 10:00 ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/07/1994)
Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/15/1994)
98 MEMORANDUM of Settlement Conference held on 3/11/94. Lengthy discussions were held w/respect to the ID of significant issues as well as the structure & scheduling of future settlement discussions. Counsel agreed to hold add'l confs between themselves on 3/24 & 25, and 3/31/94. By agreement of counsel, a continued settlement conf will be held before JGM on 4/8/94 @ 11:00. ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/15/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [97−1] motion to Seal true names of pltfs & their authorized representatives. SEE Order entered today & annexed hereto. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT overruling [61−1] objection re Mot for Ext of Time ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT overruling [63−1] objection re Motion for Ext of Time ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT overruling [65−1] objection re Ext of Time ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting in part, denying in part [94−1] motion to Stay Discovery, pursuant to the colloquy & Order of the Court entered at a hearing in open court & on

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 24 of 49

03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994
03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994
03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994 03/22/1994
04/08/1994 04/08/1994

the record today: Discovery shall be suspended until the next status conf & hrg on all the pending motions shceduled for Tues, 4/19/94 @ 9:00. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT overruling [95−1] objection re Motion for Prot Order re Interviews ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [96−1] motion for Order re Production of Records. SEE Order entered today. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
99 ORDER granting [96−1] motion for Order re Production of Records Maintained in the Juvenile Detention Centers for the Named Pltfs. These records shall be kept confidential & shall not be disclosed except to pltfs' experts or upon notice to the defts & further order of this court. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) . (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
100 MOTION by pltfs for Order re: Production of Records (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [100−1] motion for Order re: Production of Records. SEE Order entered today ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
101 MOTION by Emily J. for Order re Production of Records (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [101−1] motion for Order re Production of Records. SEE Order entered today ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
102 MOTION by Emily J. for Order re Production of Records (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSEMENT granting [102−1] motion for Order re Production of Records. SEE Order entered today ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
103 ORDER granting [101−1] motion for Order re Production of Records. Deft Reginald Mayo, Super. NH Public Schools, ordered to provide pltf counsel, education records maintained by NH Public School System for named pltfs. There records shall be kept confidential. ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
104 ORDER granting [100−1] motion for Order re: Production of Records maintained by Htfd. Public School System SEE for further details ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
105 ORDER granting [102−1] motion for Order re Production of Records Maintained by the Bdpt Public School System SEE for further details ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
106 SERVICE by Publication, Legal Notice re Children confined in Bdpt, Htfd & NH w/attached "Notice of Obj" to be filed w/in 30 days (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
Status Conference held. Martha Stone reports she will be taking tour of facility on Thursday. Status Conf set for 4/19/94 @ 9:00. Motion to suspend discovery #94 Granted in part to 4/19/94. Motions for order re: production of records−all granted. Parties to meet w/JGM re: possible settlement, before 4/19/94 status conf before JAC. ( JAC) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 03/29/1994)
Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 04/11/1994)
107 MEMORANDUM of Settlement Conference held on 4/8/94. A continued settlement conference will be held on 5/2/94 @ 10:00. SEE for further details ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 04/11/1994)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 25 of 49

04/12/1994 04/18/1994
04/18/1994
04/19/1994
04/19/1994 04/19/1994 05/05/1994 05/06/1994 05/06/1994 05/06/1994 05/17/1994 05/20/1994 05/23/1994
05/25/1994
06/02/1994 06/14/1994
06/14/1994

108 APPEARANCE of Attorney for T. Josiha Haig −− Thomas P. O'Dea Jr. (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
109 JOINT MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, Richardo M. for Protective Order (Smith, S.) Modified on 04/19/1994 (Entered: 04/19/1994)
110 STIPULATION re protective order, fld by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, Richardo M. (Smith, S.) (Entered: 04/19/1994)
ENDORSEMENT denying [110−1] stipulation pursuant to the colloquy with counsel in open court and on the record today. SEE oral order of the court on this subject today on the record, granting [109−1] joint motion for Protective Order upon consent of the parties( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 04/19/1994)
111 PROTECTIVE ORDER regarding computer records (signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes (Former Employee) (Entered: 04/19/1994)
Status Conference & hearing on pending matters held. Stipulation for entry of protective order [#110] denied. Joint motion for entry of protective order [#109] granted. Protective order entered. (JAC) (Smith, S.) (Entered: 05/14/1994)
112 TRANSCRIPT for dates of April 19, 1994 (Court reporter: Collard) (Former Employee) (Entered: 05/05/1994)
113 MOTION by Emily J. to Compel Haig's Compliance w/Discovery Requests (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
114 MEMORANDUM by Emily J. in support of [113−1] motion to Compel Haig's Compliance w/Discovery Requests by Emily J. (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
115 AFFIDAVIT of Jonel Newman by Emily J. Re [113−1] motion to Compel Haig's Compliance w/Discovery Requests by Emily J. (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
116 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino −− Martha M. Watts (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 05/18/1994)
Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 05/20/1994)
117 MEMORANDUM of Settlement Conference held on 5/20/94. Varied discussions held. ORDERED: Continued settlement conf to be held on 6/14/94 @ 10:00. JGN available for such other conferences as may be necessary. ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 05/24/1994)
ENDORSEMENT denying as moot [113−1] motion to Compel Haig's Compliance w/Discovery Requests, in accordance w/representations of counsel to chambers in a tele call on 5/24/94 ( signed by Chief Judge Jose A. Cabranes ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 05/31/1994)
118 APPEARANCE of Attorney for James A. Connelly −− Laurann Askloff (Johnson, D.) (Entered: 06/04/1994)
119 MEMORANDUM of Settlement Conference held on 6/14/94. ORDERS: by 6/17/94 defense counsel will notify pltfs' counsel re clients' position with re to installation of new beds at the Juvenile Detention Centers. On 6/22/94 @ 10:00 JGM will tour JDC in Htfd. On 6/23/94 @ 9:00 JGM will tour JDC in Bdpt, followed by tour of JDC in NH. By 7/11/94 defense counsel will provide pltfs' counsel w/written response to her settlement proposals. Continued settlement conference will be held before JGM on 7/25/94 @ 2:00. ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 06/15/1994)
Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 26 of 49

06/23/1994 07/25/1994 07/26/1994
08/25/1994 08/26/1994
10/21/1994
11/09/1994 01/10/1995 01/17/1995 01/17/1995 01/26/1995 02/02/1995
02/07/1995 06/09/1995 06/14/1995 06/21/1995 06/21/1995
06/21/1995 06/23/1995 06/28/1995 06/28/1995
06/29/1995

Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 06/23/1994)
CONTINUED Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 07/26/1994)
120 MEMORANDUM of Settlement Conference held on 7/26/94. Eight areas still awaiting response from defts. Conf. scheduled for 8/15/94 @ 2:00 in Atty General's Office in Htfd. Continued settlement conf scheduled before JGM on 8/25/94 @ 2:00 ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 07/27/1994)
CONTINUED Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 08/31/1994)
121 MEMORANDUM of Settlement Conference held on 8/25/94. ORDERS: Continued settlement conference will be held 9/22/94 @ 10:00. JGM is available for such other conference (which may be held telephonically) as may be necessary. ( signed by Mag. Judge Joan G. Margolis ) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 09/01/1994)
122 STIPULATION: Survey Data, by pltfs and defts. Protective Orders signed 12/1/93 and 4/19/94, govern the utiliation of the survey data. (see for details) (Jefferson, V.) (Entered: 10/24/1994)
123 ORDER of Transfer ( signed by Clerk ) to Judge Robert N. Chatigny (Former Employee) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
Settlement Conference held ( RNC) (Johnson, D.) (Entered: 01/13/1995)
Settlement Conference held; next conference 1/26/95 at 2:00pm ( TPS) (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/20/1995)
Settlement Conference set for 2:00 1/26/95 ( TPS) (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/20/1995)
Settlement Conference held ( TPS) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/27/1995)
124 TRANSCRIPT of Settlement Conference before Honorable Thomas P. Smith, USMJ for dates of 1/26/95 (Court reporter: electronic sound recording) (Former Employee) (Entered: 02/02/1995)
Settlement Conference held ( TPS) (Blue,A.) (Entered: 02/10/1995)
125 TRANSCRIPT RE: Settlement Conference for dates of 4/22/94 (Court reporter: Paul Collard) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/12/1995)
Telephonic Pretrial Conference set for 9:00 6/23/95 ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
126 STATE DEFENDANTS' PROPOSED PRETRIAL ORDER & REPORT (Gothers, M.) Modified on 11/30/1995 (Entered: 06/22/1995)
127 JOINT PRETRIAL CONFERENCE REPORT by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo, Ricardo M. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/22/1995)
128 JOINT STATUS REPORT FILED BY DEFENDANTS HAIG & MAYO (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/22/1995)
129 Telephonic Pre−Trial Conference held ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 06/23/1995)
130 MOTION by James A. Connelly for Laurann Asklof to Withdraw as Attorney (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/29/1995)
ENDORSEMENT granting [130−1] motion for Laurann Asklof to Withdraw as Attorney (Terminated attorney Laurann Askloff for James A. Connelly ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/05/1995)
132 Settlement Conference held ( JGM) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/12/1995)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 27 of 49

07/05/1995
07/17/1995 07/17/1995 07/24/1995 07/25/1995 07/25/1995 07/26/1995 07/27/1995 07/27/1995 07/31/1995 07/31/1995 07/31/1995 08/02/1995
08/03/1995 08/03/1995 08/04/1995 08/04/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995

131 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino IN THEIR OFFICIAL CAPACITIES −− Ralph E. Urban (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/09/1995)
133 STIPULATION RE:SCHEDULING ORDER setting Discovery cutoff 9/29/95 ; ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
ENDORSEMENT approving and adopting [133−1] Scheduling order ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
134 NOTICE of OBJECTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/25/1995)
135 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. for Production of Department of Children & Families Records (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/26/1995)
136 MEMORANDUM by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. in support of [135−1] motion for Production of Department of Children & Families Records by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/26/1995)
143 NOTICE of OBJECTION to the disclosure of confidential records by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
137 Telephonic Conference held ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 07/27/1995)
138 ORDER granting [135−1] motion for Production of Department of Children & Families Records ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 07/28/1995)
139 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. for Court Tour (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/01/1995)
140 MEMORANDUM by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. in support of [139−1] motion for Court Tour by plaintiffsssssss (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/01/1995)
141 SCHEDULING ORDER setting Dispositive Motions due 9/11/95, Responses due 10/2/95 ; Filing of Trial Memorandum by 10/2/95 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 08/01/1995)
142 MOTION by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo for Reconsideration of ORDER (MOTION NOT RULED UPON YET AS OF 8/2/95) [139−1] motion for Court Tour by plaintiffs (Brief Due 8/23/95 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/02/1995)
ENDORSEMENT granting [139−1] motion for Court Tour ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Blue,A.) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
ENDORSEMENT denying as moot [142−1] motion for Reconsideration of ORDER (MOTION NOT RULED UPON YET AS OF 8/2/95) [139−1] motion for Court Tour by plaintiffs ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Blue,A.) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
144 NOTICE of FILING OF EXPERTS' REPORTS Lynn Zimmerman, Eugene Pepper, Paul DeMuro & Michael Cohen by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/07/1995)
145 Proposed Witness list by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/07/1995)
146 NOTICE of FILING OF EXPERT'S REPORTS by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/16/1995)
147 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. for Production of Probation Placement Records (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/16/1995)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 28 of 49

08/15/1995 08/17/1995
08/17/1995
08/28/1995 08/28/1995
08/28/1995
08/29/1995 08/30/1995 08/30/1995 09/05/1995 09/13/1995 09/14/1995 09/20/1995 09/27/1995 09/29/1995 10/12/1995 10/17/1995 10/25/1995 10/27/1995

148 MEMORANDUM by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. in support of [147−1] motion for Production of Probation Placement Records by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/16/1995)
149 Letter MOTION by Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo to Extend Time until 8/23/95 to respond to the brief filed by the Plaintiff's RE: Motion for Production of Probation Placement Planning Records (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
ENDORSEMENT granting until 8/28/95 [149−1] motion to Extend Time until 8/23/95 to respond to the brief filed by the Plaintiff's Motion for Production of Probation Placement Planning Records ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
150 MOTION by Reginald Mayo for George B. Wilkinson to Withdraw as Attorney (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/28/1995)
151 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo −− Michael J. Besso (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/28/1995)
152 MEMORANDUM by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo in opposition to [147−1] motion for Production of Probation Placement Records by plaintiffsssssss (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/28/1995)
ENDORSEMENT granting [150−1] motion for George B. Wilkinson to Withdraw as Attorney (Terminated attorney George B. Wilkinson for Reginald Mayo ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/29/1995)
153 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Reginald Mayo −− Wendi J. Kemp (Montgomery, C.) (Entered: 08/31/1995)
154 MOTION by Reginald Mayo to Extend Time to 9/15/95 to respond to second set of interrogatories. (Brief Due 9/20/95 ) (Montgomery, C.) (Entered: 08/31/1995)
ENDORSEMENT granting [154−1] motion to Extend Time to 9/15/95 to respond to second set of interrogatories. ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 09/06/1995)
155 MOTION by Reginald Mayo to Extend Time until 9/22/95 to respond and/or object to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/14/1995)
ENDORSEMENT granting [155−1] motion to Extend Time until 9/22/95 to respond and/or object to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Interrogatories & Requests for Production ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Blue,A.) (Entered: 09/15/1995)
Telephonic Conference set for 8:00 9/29/95 ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 09/20/1995)
COURT Trial set for 12/13/95 ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 09/27/1995)
156 Telephonic Pre−Trial Conference held ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 09/29/1995)
157 NOTICE of OBJECTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 10/23/1995)
158 NOTICE of OBJECTION by Grace Gregor (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/25/1995)
159 NOTICE of OBJECTION by Craven (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/25/1995)
160 TELEPHONIC Pre−Trial Conference held ( RNC) (Former Employee) (Entered: 10/31/1995)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 29 of 49

11/03/1995 12/20/1995 01/31/1996 03/12/1996 04/29/1996 04/30/1996 05/24/1996
05/29/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/06/1996 11/27/1996 12/04/1996 12/11/1996 12/11/1996 12/11/1996 01/21/1997 01/23/1997
01/23/1997

161 Pre−Trial Conference Calander held ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) Modified on 11/07/1995 (Entered: 11/06/1995)
162 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. −− Carroll Lee Lucht (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 12/21/1995)
ENDORSEMENT denying [147−1] motion for Production of Probation Placement Records ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/01/1996)
163 PRETRIAL ORDER setting Filing of Trial Memorandum by 6/3/96 ; see order for further details ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/12/1996)
164 MOTION by James A. Connelly for Nicole I. Mason to Withdraw as Attorney (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 04/30/1996)
ENDORSEMENT granting [164−1] motion for Nicole I. Mason to Withdraw as Attorney ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/01/1996)
165 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo, Ricardo M. to Extend Time for 30 days to respond to the Court's Pretrial Order (Former Employee) (Entered: 05/24/1996)
166 MOTION by T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo to Extend Time for 30 days to respond to the Court's Pretrial Order (Former Employee) (Entered: 05/29/1996)
ENDORSEMENT granting [165−1] motion to Extend Time for 30 days to respond to the Court's Pretrial Order, reset Filing of Trial Memorandum due by 7/3/96 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
167 ORDER of referral referred to Mag. Judge Thomas P. Smith for conference (signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
ENDORSEMENT granting [166−1] motion to Extend Time for 30 days to respond to the Court's Pretrial Order ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
168 AMENDED MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. to Certify Class (Brief Due 12/18/96 ) referring to: [4−1] motion for Class Certification by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 12/03/1996)
ENDORSEMENT granting [168−1] supplemental amended motion to Certify Class ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 12/05/1996)
169 LEGAL NOTICE OF PROPOSED SETTLEMENT OF CLASS ACTION AND CERTIFICATION OF SUBCLASS (signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 12/11/1996)
170 ORDER directing notice of proposed settlement of class action (signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 12/11/1996)
Motion hearing re: Proposed settlement of class action set for 1/23/97 at 4:00 p.m. (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 12/11/1996)
171 MOTION by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M. for JONel Newman to Withdraw as Attorney (Former Employee) (Entered: 01/22/1997)
ENDORSEMENT granting [171−1] motion for JONel Newman to Withdraw as Attorney (Terminated attorney Jonel Newman for Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., for Matt A., William R., and for Emily J. ( signed by Judge N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/23/1997)
172 Fairness hearing continued until 2/6/97 at 2:00 P.M. ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/24/1997)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 30 of 49

01/24/1997 01/24/1997 01/30/1997 02/06/1997 02/06/1997 02/06/1997
02/06/1997
02/06/1997
02/06/1997
02/06/1997
02/06/1997
02/06/1997 02/19/1997 05/15/1997 08/11/1997

173 Supplemental ORDER directing notice of proposed settlement of class action ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 01/24/1997)
174 Supplemental NOTICE of Proposed settlement of class action (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 01/24/1997)
175 TRANSCRIPT for date of 1/23/97 (Court reporter: Paul Collard) (Wood, R.) (Entered: 01/30/1997)
176 CONSENT JUDGMENT for Ricardo M., Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
177 CONSENT JUDGMENT for Ricardo M., Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
178 AFFIDAVIT of Genevieve Bednarz by Ricardo M., Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. Re [177−1] judgment order, and [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
179 AFFIDAVIT of Shirley Accatino by Ricardo M., Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. Re [177−1] judgment order, [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
180 AFFIDAVIT of Masheekia Broadie by Ricardo M., Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. Re [177−1] judgment order, [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
181 AFFIDAVIT of Judith S. Douglas by Ricardo M., Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. Re [177−1] judgment order, [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
182 AFFIDAVIT of Jackie Crawford by Ricardo M., Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. Re [177−1] judgment order, [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
183 AFFIDAVIT of Sue Mauro by Ricardo M., Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. Re [177−1] judgment order, [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/10/1997)
Case closed (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/12/1997)
184 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/6/97 (Court reporter: Paul Collard) (Wood, R.) (Entered: 02/20/1997)
185 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. −− Margaret Quilter Chapple (Wood, R.) (Entered: 05/15/1997)
186 LETTER dated 8/8/97 Regarding: payment to Mr. DeVore by Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/11/1997)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 31 of 49

08/11/1997
10/06/1997 03/04/1998 03/17/1998
07/21/1998 08/17/1998 10/28/1998 12/16/1998 02/11/1999 03/17/1999
04/28/1999 06/23/1999 09/08/1999
09/08/1999 09/08/1999 09/17/1999
10/08/1999

187 ORDER − in accordance with the Consent Degree dated 2/6/97 the State of Connecticut shall pay the Court−appointed Panel Member Donald W. Devore in the amount $4,155.04 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/11/1997)
188 ORDER State of Connecticut shall pay forthwith Donald W. DeVore $3,846.58 SEE FOR DETAILS ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 10/07/1997)
189 ORDER − with regards to the consent degree of 2/6/97 the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Monitoring Panel member, David W. DeVore, in the amount of $2,825.38 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/04/1998)
190 ORDER issued re: Consent Decree dated 2/6/97. State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore for services rendered in the amount of $2,556.99. (signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 03/17/1998)
191 ORDER − re: the consent decree dated 2/6/97 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/22/1998)
192 ORDER − as provided in the provisions of the consent degree of 2/6/97 the State of Connecticut shall reimburse Donald W. DeVore in the amount of $1,527.02 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/17/1998)
193 ORDER − The State of Connecticut shall reinburse Donald W. DeVore for services rendered on September 21−22, and Oct, 13, 1998 in the amount of $2,032.50 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/02/1998)
194 ORDER − the State of Connecticut shall reimburse Donald W. DeVore in the amount of $3,152.79 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 12/16/1998)
195 ORDER, re: see order for details ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Blue,A.) (Entered: 02/12/1999)
196 ORDER − the court shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore for services rendered February 23,24,25, & 26, 1999, in the amount of $3,327.75 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
197 Telephone Conference held ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/04/1999)
198 ORDER − payment is to made to the Court−appointed Monitoring Panal Member, David W. DeVore in the amount of $4,454.52 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/24/1999)
199 MOTION by Ricardo M., Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/08/1999)
ENDORSEMENT granting [199−1] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/08/1999)
200 ORDER − the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the court−appointed Monitoring Panel Dr. Janet Williams for services rendered 3/2/99−7/29/99 in the amount $5,500.00 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/08/1999)
201 ORDER − consent decree dated 2/6/97 ordered the State of Connecticut to reimburse the Court− appointed Monitoring Panal Member, Donald Devore $12,780.46 for services rendered. ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/20/1999)
202 ORDER − in accordance with the the Consent Degree dated 2/6/97 The State of CT shall reimburse the court−apointed Monitoring Panel Member, Janet E. Williams, M.D. $875.00 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) Modified on

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 32 of 49

11/22/1999 02/17/2000
02/17/2000 04/11/2000
05/05/2000 05/08/2000 05/23/2000 07/05/2000 08/28/2000 09/08/2000 10/18/2000 10/23/2000
12/05/2000 12/26/2000 01/12/2001 05/09/2001 05/25/2001 07/09/2001 08/14/2001

10/08/1999 (Entered: 10/08/1999)
203 ORDER − the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore ` in the amount of $2,605.37 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/22/1999)
204 ORDER − consent decree indicates that The State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court− appointed Monitiruing Panel Member, Janet E. Williams, M.D. in the amount of $2,500.00 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/17/2000)
205 ORDER − the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−Appointed panel member, Donald W. DeVore in the amount of $4,876.65 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/17/2000)
206 ORDER − the consent degree dated 2/6/97 it is ordered that the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Janet E. Williams, M.D. in the amount of $3,000.00 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/12/2000)
207 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Reginald Mayo −− Ann−Marie DeGraffenreidt (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/05/2000)
208 Telephone Status Conference held (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 05/09/2000)
209 ORDER − The State of Connceticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore in the amount of $5,085.92 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/24/2000)
210 ORDER for Defendants to pay $4233.29 (see for details) ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 07/07/2000)
211 ORDER It is ordered that the State of CT. shall pay Donald W. DeVore the sum of $2,303.89 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Montgomery, C.) (Entered: 08/28/2000)
212 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore in the amount of $2,348.16 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/11/2000)
213 ORDER re payment of monitor $4,250.00 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 10/20/2000)
214 ORDER re: the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the court−appointed monitoring panel member, Donald W. DeVore for services rendered from 9/14/2000 to 9/22/00 the amount of $3,882.84 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Johnson, D.) (Entered: 10/24/2000)
215 In court conference held (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 12/05/2000)
216 ORDER for State of Connecticut to reimburse Donald DeVore for $6,394.93 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 12/27/2000)
217 TRANSCRIPT for date of 12/5/00 (Court reporter: Paul Collard) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/12/2001)
218 ORDER for Defendants to reimburse Donald DeVore $3976.10 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Former Employee) (Entered: 05/10/2001)
219 ORDER − State of CT shall reimburse the Court − Appointed Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore, for services rendered from 5/16/01−5/18/01 in the amount of $2,395.70. ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/29/2001)
220 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore for services from 5/22/01 − 6/22/01 in the amount of $4,460.06 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/09/2001)
221 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Dr. Janet E. Williams from 2/13/01 − 8/1/01 in the amount of $3,250.00 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/15/2001)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 33 of 49

09/07/2001 10/10/2001 12/27/2001 12/28/2001 12/28/2001 01/06/2002
01/11/2002
01/14/2002 01/14/2002 01/22/2002 01/29/2002
01/29/2002
01/30/2002 01/30/2002 01/31/2002

222 ORDER − Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore to be paid $1,879.19 for services rendered between 8/9/01 − 8/17/01 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/07/2001)
223 ORDER − Consent degree dated 2/6/97 ordered State of Connecticut to remiburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. Devore, for services rendered from 8/26/01 − 9/7/01 in the amount of $3,264.87 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 10/10/2001)
224 ORDER − re: Donald W. DeVore owed in the amount of $3,979.95 − see for details ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/02/2002)
225 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. for Enforcement of the Extension , & to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order (Brief Due 1/18/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/03/2002)
226 MEMORANDUM by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. in support of [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, & [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/03/2002)
359 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL by Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr.; regarding [358−1] appeal by Michael Mack, Cynthia K. Swienton, Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino Certified Copies of Amended Notice of Appeal and Docket to USCA. (Basile, F.) (Entered: 01/10/2003)
227 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. to Extend Time until 1/31/02 to file a response to the Motion for Enforcement & Extension & Modification of Consent Decree (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/11/2002)
228 Telephone Motion hearing held re: [227−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/31/02 to file a response to the Motion for Enforcement & Extension & Modification of Consent Decree by defendants. Continuted until 1/22/02 at 3:30. ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
Telephonne Motion hearing re: [227−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/31/02 to file a response to the Motion for Enforcement & Extension & Modification of Consent Decree by defendants set at 3:30 1/22/02 ( RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
229 Telephone Status Conference held, continued to 1/30/02 at 1:30 (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 01/30/2002)
231 MEMORANDUM by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. in opposition to [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension by plaintiffs, & [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/30/2002)
232 AFFIDAVIT of Anne Louise Thompson by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Re [231−1] opposition memorandum by defendants, re: [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension & [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/30/2002)
230 Telephone Status Conference held, continuted to 2−6−02 at 1:00 (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 01/30/2002)
Telephone Status Conference set for 1:00 2/6/02 (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 01/30/2002)
233 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. to Extend Time until 2/12/02 to file

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 34 of 49

01/31/2002 01/31/2002 01/31/2002
01/31/2002
02/04/2002 02/04/2002 02/04/2002 02/04/2002 02/06/2002 02/07/2002
02/11/2002
02/12/2002

memorandum in opposition to Motion for Enforcement, Extension & Modification of Consent Decree (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/05/2002)
234 MEMORANDUM by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. in opposition to [225−1] motion for Enforcement of Extension, & [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
235 REPLY by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. to response to [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, & [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
236 AFFIDAVIT of John Chapman by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Re [235−1] response by defendants, [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, & [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
237 AFFIDAVIT of David May by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Re [235−1] response reply by defendants, [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
238 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. in Limine RE: limiting the scope of evidence (Brief Due 2/25/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
239 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. for inspection (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
240 MEMORANDUM by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. in support of [239−1] motion for inspection (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
241 AFFIDAVIT of Leo Arnone by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Re [239−1] motion for inspection by defendants (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
242 Telephone Status Conference held (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 02/06/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [233−1] motion to Extend Time until 2/12/02 to file memorandum in opposition to Motion for Enforcement, Extension & Modification of Consent Decree, Brief Deadline reset for 2/12/02 [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, reset for 2/12/02 [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
243 MEMORANDUM by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. in opposition to [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension by plaintiffs, [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/12/2002)
244 MEMORANDUM by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. in opposition to [238−1] motion in Limine RE: limiting the scope of evidence by defendants & Reply Brief in Opposition to the Motion for

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 35 of 49

02/12/2002 02/12/2002 02/12/2002 02/12/2002 02/12/2002
02/12/2002
02/13/2002 02/13/2002
02/13/2002 02/13/2002 02/13/2002 02/13/2002 02/13/2002
02/14/2002 02/15/2002 02/19/2002 02/19/2002 02/20/2002

Enforcement, Extension, & Modification of Consent Degree (Part 1 of 2) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/12/2002)
245 MOTION by David May, Leonard Barbieri, Peter Dobson to Quash deposition subpoena & Memorandum in Support (Brief Due 3/5/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
246 MOTION by Cynthia K. Swienton, Michael Mack to Quash Subpoena (Brief Due 3/5/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
247 MEMORANDUM by Cynthia K. Swienton, Michael Mack in support of [246−1] motion to Quash Subpoena (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
248 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Cynthia K. Swienton, Michael Mack −− Mark F. Kohler (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
249 MEMORANDUM by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. in opposition to [238−1] motion in Limine RE: limiting the scope of evidence by defendantss, movant, defendant & Brief in Opposition to Motion for Enforcement, Extension, & Modification of Consent Decree (Part 1 of 2) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
249 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion In Limine & REPLY by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. to response to [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Part 2 of 2) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
250 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Cynthia K. Swienton, Michael Mack −− James K. Robertson Jr. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
251 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. to Amend [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs (Brief Due 3/6/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
252 PROTECTIVE ORDER to ensure confidentiality of children issued. (signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
253 Evidentiary Hearing held Reporter: Darlene Warner ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/14/2002)
MINUTE Entry: denying [238−1] motion in Limine RE: limiting the scope of evidence ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/14/2002)
MINUTE Entry: denying [246−1] motion to Quash Subpoena ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/14/2002)
MINUTE Entry: denying without prejudice [251−1] motion to Amend [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs − Oral motion to Sequester Witnesses GRANTED ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/14/2002)
254 Evidentiary Hearing held Reporter: Warner − Defendant's Oral Motion to Substitute Leo C. Arnone for Anthony Salius GRANTED ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) Modified on 02/19/2002 (Entered: 02/19/2002)
256 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/14/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/19/2002)
255 STIPULATION regarding effective date of the Consent Judgment filed by the parties. (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 02/19/2002)
257 Evidentiary Hearing continued until 2/20/02 at 10:00 Reporter: Warner ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/20/2002)
258 Evidentiary Hearing continued on Motions to Substitute Parties 225−1 & 225−2. Oral Motions to Substitute GRANTED Reporter: Warner ( RNC) (Gothers, M.) Modified on 02/21/2002 (Entered: 02/21/2002)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 36 of 49

02/20/2002 02/20/2002 02/20/2002 02/20/2002 02/20/2002 02/25/2002
02/25/2002 02/25/2002 02/27/2002 02/28/2002
03/04/2002 03/04/2002 03/04/2002 03/05/2002
03/11/2002 03/13/2002 03/14/2002

259 Marked witness List as to Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
260 Marked witness List as to Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
261 Marked exhibit List as to Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
262 Marked exhibit List as to Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
263 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May −− Steven R. Strom (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
264 Motion hearing held re: [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension by plaintiffs, [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order by plaintiffs. Court finds non−compliance has been demonstrated as to mental health provisions of the consent judgment. Parties to develop corrective action plan. Written ruling to follow. Issues relating to other provisions of the consent judgment to be decided at a later date. (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) Modified on 03/08/2002 (Entered: 02/25/2002)
265 Telephone Motion hearing held plaintiff's oral motion to extend consent decree − granted. Consent decree extended until 4/22/02 (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 02/26/2002)
266 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/13/02 (Court reporter: Darlene Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/26/2002)
267 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/25/02 (Court reporter: Darlene Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/28/2002)
268 ORDER re: consent decree dated 2/6/97 − the State of Connecticut shall reinburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore, for services from 1/14/02 thru 1/31/02 in amount of $10,663.47 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/28/2002)
269 TRANSCRIPT for date of February 13, 2002 (Excerpt from testimony of Dr. Williams (Court reporter: D. Warner) (Kunofsky, L.) Modified on 03/04/2002 (Entered: 03/04/2002)
270 TRANSCRIPT for date of February 20, 2002. Excerpts from the testimony of Dr. Ando and Mr. Brooks (Court reporter: D. Warner) (Kunofsky, L.) Modified on 03/04/2002 (Entered: 03/04/2002)
271 MOTION by Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. for Sharon M. Hartley to Withdraw as Attorney (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/05/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [271−1] motion for Sharon M. Hartley to Withdraw as Attorney (Terminated attorney Sharon M. Hartley for Lowell P. Weicker, for Aaron Ment, for Anthony J. Salius, for Peter Dobson, for Donald Konefal, for Mark Guasta,for Rose Alma Senatore, for Vincent Ferrandino ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/05/2002)
277 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Rose Alma Senatore −− Susan T. Pearlman (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/22/2002)
272 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/25/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/14/2002)
273 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Vincent Ferrandino (Sergi), Rose Alma Senatore (Ragaglia), Lowell P. Weicker Jr.(Rowland) −− Mark F. Kohler (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 37 of 49

03/14/2002
03/14/2002
03/15/2002 03/27/2002 04/05/2002
04/05/2002 04/08/2002 04/08/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002 04/15/2002

274 NOTICE OF APPEAL of [265−1] telephone motion hearing held granting extension of Consent Decree to 4/22/02 by Vincent Ferrandino (Sergi), Rose Alma Senatore (Ragaglia), Lowell P. Weicker Jr. (Rowland) FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # H5833 Certified Copy of Appeal and Docket mailed to USCA (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 03/18/2002)
275 NOTICE OF APPEAL of [265−1] telephone motion hearing held granting extension of Consent Decree to 4/22/02 by Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr. (Pellegrino), David May, Leonard Barbieri, Leo C. Arnone FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # H5832 Certified Copy of Appeal and Docket mailed to USCA (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 03/18/2002)
276 MOTION by Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. for Stephen O'Neill to Withdraw as Attorney (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/22/2002)
278 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J., David May, Leonard Barbieri to Extend Time for thirty days after the Court enters final orders re: mental health issues (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/27/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [276−1] motion for Stephen O'Neill to Withdraw as Attorney (Terminated attorney Stephen J. O'Neill for Lowell P. Weicker, for Aaron Ment, for Peter Dobson, for Rose Alma Senatore, for Vincent Ferrandino ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/08/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [278−1] motion to Extend Time for thirty days after the Court enters final orders re: mental health issues ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/08/2002)
279 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. for Steven J. Schwartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/09/2002)
ENDORSEMENT [279−1] motion for Steven J. Schwartz to Appear Pro Hac Vice ordered accordingly ( signed by Clerk ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/09/2002)
280 Status Conference held. Hearing scheduled for 5/20/02 and 5/28/02 at 10:00. (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
281 TRANSCRIPT for date of 1/14/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
282 TRANSCRIPT for date of 4/15/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
283 TRANSCRIPT for date of 1/30/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
284 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/6/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
285 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/13/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
286 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/14/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
287 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/19/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
288 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/20/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
289 TRANSCRIPT for date of 2/25/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
290 ORDER extending the Consent Degree until 6/24/02 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 38 of 49

04/16/2002 04/25/2002
04/29/2002 05/10/2002 05/14/2002 05/20/2002 05/28/2002 05/31/2002 05/31/2002 06/03/2002
06/03/2002
06/03/2002
06/03/2002 06/03/2002 06/03/2002 06/03/2002
06/04/2002
06/04/2002

291 ORDER of referral to Mag. Judge Donna F. Martinez for settlement conference (signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/16/2002)
292 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr.; regarding [274−1] appeal by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino Certified Copies of Amended Notice of Appeal and Docket to USCA. (Basile, F.) (Entered: 04/26/2002)
293 APPEARANCE of Attorney for Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. −− Steven J. Schwartz (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/30/2002)
294 Telephonic Status Conference held ( DFM) (Wood, R.) (Entered: 05/13/2002)
295 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. for Costs and Fees for Court Monitors (Brief Due 6/4/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/15/2002)
296 Status Conference held. Evidentiary hearing scheduled beginning 6/5/02 through 6/11/02 (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 05/20/2002)
297 Status Conference held (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 05/28/2002)
298 Supplemental Corrective Action Plan on Services & Monitoring (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/31/2002)
299 Joint Plan on Screening & Evaluation (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/31/2002)
300 OBJECTIONS by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May to [295−1] motion for Costs and Fees for Court Monitors by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/04/2002)
301 MEMORANDUM by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May in opposition to [295−1] motion for Costs and Fees for Court Monitors by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/04/2002)
302 AFFIDAVIT of Steven R. Strom by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May Re [301−1] opposition memorandum by defendant , [295−1] motion for Costs and Fees for Court Monitors by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/04/2002)
303 Proposed Witness list by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/04/2002)
304 Proposed Exhibit List by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/04/2002)
305 Proposed Witness list by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/04/2002)
306 Supplemental Corrective Action Plan by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May to [298−1] corrective action plan (Gothers, M.) Modified on 06/04/2002 (Entered: 06/04/2002)
307 Proposed Corrective Action Plan by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leonard Barbieri, David May to [298−1] corrective action plan (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/04/2002)
308 Supplemental Preliminary List of Exhibits by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/05/2002)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 39 of 49

06/04/2002 06/04/2002 06/05/2002 06/06/2002 06/10/2002
06/17/2002 06/18/2002 06/20/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002
06/24/2002 06/25/2002
06/25/2002 06/28/2002
07/03/2002

309 PROPOSED Conclusions of Law by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., R., Emily J. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/05/2002)
310 PROPOSED Findings of Fact by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., R., Emily J. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/05/2002)
311 Corrective action plan Hearing held and continuted until 6/6/02 (RNC) Reporter: D. Warner (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 06/06/2002)
315 Hearing on corrective action plan Held. Joint corrective plan filed this date (RNC) Reporter/ECRO: D. Warner (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 06/18/2002)
312 Scheduling Order from USCA regarding [292−1] appeal by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Aaron Ment Jr., Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo, [275−1] appeal by Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May, Aaron Ment Jr., Peter Dobson, [274−1] appeal by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino USCA Number: 02−7311(L), 02−7319 (Con) (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 06/10/2002)
314 Plaintiff's Memorandum Regarding Additions to Joint Plan (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/18/2002)
313 Defendant's Proposal Regarding Additional Provisions for Corrective Action Plan (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/18/2002)
316 Hearing on joint corrective action plan docs 313 and 314 held (RNC) Reporter: D. Warner (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 06/20/2002)
317 Telephone Conference held re: corrective action plan [doc. 313] and 314 . Fairness hearing on non−mental health scheduled for 7/23/02 at 10:00 (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 06/24/2002)
318 ORDER for Supplemental Relief − see for details ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/24/2002)
319 Joint Corrective Action Plan to [318−1] order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/24/2002)
320 REPLY by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. to response to [295−1] motion for Costs and Fees for Court Monitors by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/25/2002)
321 STIPULATED Agreement regarding Non−mental Health Issues by Ricardo M., Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/25/2002)
ENDORSEMENT approving [321−1] stipulation re: non−mental health issues ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/25/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, granting [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order See Order for Supplemental Relief document 318 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/25/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [225−1] motion for Enforcement of the Extension, granting [225−2] motion to Modify [177−1] judgment order, & [176−1] judgment order ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/25/2002)
322 RULING and ORDER granting [295−1] motion for Costs and Fees for Court Monitors − State of CT shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitor, Donald W. DeVore, from 2/5/02 − 2/19/02 in the amount of $10,008.63 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) Page(s) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/28/2002)
323 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL by Lowell P. Weicker Jr.; regarding [274−1] appeal by Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Kristine Ragaglia; Theodore S Sergie, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino Certified Copies of Amended Notice of Appeal and Docket to USCA. (Basile, F.) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 40 of 49

07/08/2002 07/15/2002 07/15/2002 07/23/2002 07/24/2002 08/01/2002 08/09/2002
08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/20/2002
08/21/2002 08/21/2002

324 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL by Lowell P. Weicker Jr.; regarding [323−1] appeal by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Certified Copies of Amended Notice of Appeal and Docket to USCA. (Basile, F.) (Entered: 07/10/2002)
325 ORDER Directing Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/16/2002)
326 Legal Notice of Proposed Settlement of Class Action ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/16/2002)
327 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. to Extend Time for 45 days to file a request for costs & attorney's fees (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/24/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [327−1] motion to Extend Time for 45 days to file a request for costs & attorney's fees ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/24/2002)
328 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. for Costs and Fees re: Court Monitoring (Brief Due 8/22/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/01/2002)
337 OBJECTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone to proposed monitoring budget and MOTION for Hearing (Grady, B.) (Entered: 08/13/2002)
329 Fairness Hearing Held re: non−mental health issues. Court approves Stipulated Agreement effective today. (RNC) Reporter/ECRO: D. Warner (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 08/12/2002)
330 STIPULATION Agreement regarding non−mental health issues (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 08/12/2002)
ENDORSEMENT approving [330−1] stipulation agreement ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 08/12/2002)
331 AFFIDAVIT of Margaret Q. Chapple by James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Re [329−1] fairness hearing (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 08/12/2002)
332 Acknowledgement of Receipt from Attorney Martha Stone of plaintiff's exhibits (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 08/12/2002)
333 Acknowledgement of Receipt from Attorney Margaret Chapple of defendant's exhibits (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 08/12/2002)
334 TRANSCRIPT for date of 6/5/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/13/2002)
335 TRANSCRIPT for date of 6/6/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/13/2002)
336 TRANSCRIPT for date of 6/20/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/13/2002)
338 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May to Extend Time until 9/24/02 to comply with the joint corrective action plan (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/20/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [338−1] motion to Extend Time until 9/24/02 to comply with the joint corrective action plan ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/21/2002)
339 OBJECTIONS by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May to [328−1] motion for Costs and Fees re: Court Monitoring by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/21/2002)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 41 of 49

09/06/2002 09/06/2002 09/12/2002 09/24/2002 09/24/2002
09/25/2002
09/25/2002
09/26/2002 10/07/2002 10/10/2002 10/11/2002 10/18/2002
10/30/2002 11/01/2002 11/15/2002
11/25/2002
12/02/2002 12/03/2002

340 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. for Costs and Fees (Brief Due 9/27/02 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/10/2002)
341 MEMORANDUM by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. in support of [340−1] motion for Costs and Fees (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/10/2002)
ENDORSEMENT so ordered [328−1] motion for Costs and Fees re: Court Monitoring ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/12/2002)
342 Telephone Conference held (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 09/24/2002)
343 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May to Extend Time until 11/15/02 to comply with paragraph D. 1 of the Joint Correction Action Plan (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/24/2002)
344 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May to Extend Time until 10/18/02 to respond to Motion for Attorney's Fees & Expenses (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/25/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [344−1] motion to Extend Time until 10/18/02 to respond to Motion for Attorney's Fees & Expenses, Brief Deadline reset for 10/18/02 [340−1] motion for Costs and Fees ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/25/2002)
345 Telephone Conference held (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 09/26/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [343−1] motion to Extend Time until 11/15/02 to comply with paragraph D. 1 of the Joint Correction Action Plan ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 10/07/2002)
346 Quarterly Compliance Conference held (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 10/15/2002)
347 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore in amount of $4,637.32 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 10/15/2002)
348 MEMORANDUM by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May in opposition to [340−1] motion for Costs and Fees by plaintiffs (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 10/18/2002)
349 MOTION by Ricardo M., Paul M., Emily J. to Extend Time to respond to Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees & Expenses (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 10/31/2002)
ENDORSEMENT granting [349−1] motion to Extend Time to respond to Motion for Award of Attorney's Fees & Expenses ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/01/2002)
350 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May to Extend Time until 2/15/03 to comply with paragraph D. 1 of Joint Correction Action Plan (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/18/2002)
351 MEMORANDUM by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. in opposition to [350−1] motion to Extend Time until 2/15/03 to comply with paragraph D. 1 of Joint Correction Action Plan by defendant (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/25/2002)
352 REPLY by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. to response to [340−1] motion for Costs and Fees by plaintiffsssssss (Blue,A.) (Entered: 12/03/2002)
353 ORDER, State of CT to pay DW DeVore $6,793.56 forthwith ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 42 of 49

12/03/2002 12/06/2002
12/11/2002 12/18/2002 01/06/2003
01/13/2003 01/16/2003 01/21/2003 01/23/2003 02/18/2003 02/27/2003 03/27/2003 04/08/2003
04/09/2003
04/09/2003 04/23/2003 04/28/2003 05/06/2003

354 ORDER, State of CT to pay C Crowe $2,125.00 forthwith ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 12/06/2002)
355 Telephone Conference held. Defendant's second motion to extend time [#350] granted. Requested extension to continue services of monitor for another six months − granted. First monthly progress report will be filed in January. (RNC) (Kunofsky, L.) (Entered: 12/09/2002)
356 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Janet Williams in the amount of $10,812.50 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
357 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe for services for 11/5/02 − 11/27/02 in amount of $4,662.68 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 12/20/2002)
358 AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL by Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Cynthia K. Swienton, Michael Mack ; regarding [323−1] appeal by Lowell P. Weicker Jr. Certified Copies of Amended Notice of Appeal and Docket to USCA. (Basile, F.) (Entered: 01/10/2003)
360 January Progress Report (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/14/2003)
361 ORDER − the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court appointed Panel Member, Christina Crowe from 12/6/02 − 12/18/02 in the amount of $3,397.90 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/21/2003)
362 ORDER − The State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald DeVore for services from 9/12/02 − 10/22/02 in the amount of $9,513.70 ( signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/21/2003)
363 TRANSCRIPT for date of 12/6/02 (Court reporter: Darlene A. Warner) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 01/23/2003)
364 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crown, in the amount of $2,893.00 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/18/2003)
365 Progress Report (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 02/27/2003)
366 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−Appointed Panel Member, Donald DeVore, in the amount of $9,607.39 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 03/28/2003)
367 Progress REPORT by Reginald Mayo, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May (Gothers, M.) Modified on 04/09/2003 (Entered: 04/09/2003)
368 March Progress Report by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/09/2003)
369 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe, in the amount of $6,450.20 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/09/2003)
370 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reinburse the Court−Appointed Panel Member, Christina Crowe for services from 2/6/03 − 2/28/03 in the amount of $6,653.30 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 04/23/2003)
371 RULING granting [340−1] motion for Costs and Fees ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) 6 Page(s) (Basile, F.) (Entered: 04/29/2003)
372 MOTION by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, David May, Leonard Barbieri for Reconsideration of [371−1] order dated 4/28/03 re: , & for Clarification of [371−1] order & Modify (Brief Due 5/27/03 ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/06/2003)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 43 of 49

05/06/2003
05/19/2003 05/28/2003 06/17/2003 07/07/2003 07/10/2003 07/10/2003 07/10/2003 08/18/2003 08/18/2003 09/25/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003

373 MEMORANDUM by Ricardo M., Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Mark Guasta, Donald Konefal, Peter Dobson, Anthony J. Salius, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J., David May, Leonard Barbieri, Peter Dobson, Cynthia K. Swienton, Michael Mack, Leo C. Arnone, David May, US Court of Appeals, Leonard Barbieri in support of [372−1] motion for Reconsideration of [371−1] order dated 4/28/03 re:, [372−2] motion for Clarification of [371−1] order (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/06/2003)
374 PARTIAL MEMORANDUM by Ricardo M., Paul M., Mark B., Michael T., Ramon C., Matt A., William R., Emily J. in opposition to [372−1] motion for Reconsideration of [371−1] order dated 4/28/03, [372−2] motion for Clarification of [371−1] order by defendant (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/22/2003)
375 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe from 4/1/03−4/28/03 in the amount of $2,000.00 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 05/28/2003)
ENDORSEMENT granting [372−1] motion for Reconsideration of [371−1] order dated 4/28/03 re:, granting [372−2] motion for Clarification of [371−1] order See for details ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 06/18/2003)
376 MANDATE OF USCA (certified copy) dated 6/26/03 withdrawing [274−1] appeal ( Roseann Mackechnie) (Basile, F.) (Entered: 07/07/2003)
377 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−Appointed Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore, for services of 2/5/03 − 3/6/03 in amount of $6,293.40 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/10/2003)
378 ORDER State of Connecticut shall reimburse Court appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe, for services from 6/1/03 − 6/16/03 in amount of $9,060.78 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/10/2003)
379 ORDER − Court of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court Appointed Monitoring Pnael Member, Christina Crowe, for services from 5/1/03−5/31/03 in amount of %5,875.00 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 07/10/2003)
380 Quarterly Progress Report for Period of 4/25/03−7/24/03 by Reginald Mayo, James A. Connelly, T. Josiha Haig, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, Peter Dobson, Aaron Ment Jr., Lowell P. Weicker Jr., Leo C. Arnone, David May (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/19/2003)
381 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore, for services rendered from 3/27/03 − 6/17/03 in the amount of $7,251.66 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 08/19/2003)
382 ORDER − State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christine Crowe, for services rendered from 6/17/03 − 6/03/03 in the amount of $2,606.75 ( signed by Chief Judge Robert N. Chatigny ) (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 09/25/2003)
383 ORDER RE: Plaintiff's Attorney's Fees & Costs. The State of CT shall pay plaintiff's counsel $37,000.00 in attorney's fees & $1,344.19 in costs. Attorney's fees incurred through 7/1/02−6/30/03. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/31/03. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/05/2003)
384 ORDER − State of CT shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christine Crowe for services rendered from 7/14/03 − 7/29/03, in the amount of $5,974.75. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/31/03. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/05/2003)
385 ORDER − the State of CT shall reimburse the Court−apointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christine Crowe, for services rendered from 8/5/03 − 9/19/03 in the amount of $2,408.00. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/31/03. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/05/2003)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 44 of 49

11/05/2003
11/10/2003 11/24/2003
11/24/2003
12/17/2003
01/06/2004
01/07/2004 04/07/2004 04/08/2004 04/16/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 04/22/2004 06/07/2004 06/08/2004 06/28/2004

386 ORDER State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore, for services rendered from 7/6/03 − 9/5/03 in the amount of $7,321.50. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/4/03. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/21/2003)
387 ORDER re: Substitute first four sentences of paragraph 1 of the Joint Corrective Action Plan . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/7/03. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/21/2003)
388 ORDER − the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe, for services rendered from 10/1/03−10/30/03 in the amount of $12,085.93 . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/24/03. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/26/2003)
389 ORDER − the State of Connecticut shall reimburse the Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Donald W. DeVore, for services rendered from 9/9/03−10/16/03, in the amount of $3,911.48. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/24/03. (Gothers, M.) (Entered: 11/26/2003)
390 REINSTATMENT ORDER of USCA as to 274 Notice of Appeal, filed by Lowell P. Weicker, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, 275 Notice of Appeal, filed by Leonard Barbieri, Leo C. Arnone, Aaron Ment, Peter Dobson, David May USCA Case Number 02−7311/02−7319 (Basile, F.) (Entered: 12/17/2003)
391 RESPONSE re 389 Order re letter, filed by Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, James A. Connelly, Peter Dobson, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, David May, Reginald Mayo, Aaron Ment Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Lowell P. Weicker Jr.. (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 01/07/2004)
392 OBJECTION by Rose Alma Senatore (DCF) to proposed budget submitted on 11/18/03 (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 01/08/2004)
393 RULILNG AND ORDER re Letter objection to Mr. DeVore's bill 10/03−1/04. State ordered to pay full amount of $10,082.34. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/7/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 04/07/2004)
394 RULING & ORDER State ordered to pay Ms. Crowe's bills in full . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/8/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 04/13/2004)
395 ORDER State of CT to reimburse Court−Appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Janet E. Williams, $2,125. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/7/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 04/19/2004)
396 MOTION for William H. Narwold to Withdraw as Attorney by Reginald Mayo. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 04/22/2004)
397 ORDER re: State of CT shall pay forthwith Donald W. DeVore total sum of $7,312.52. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/22/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 04/22/2004)
398 ORDER re: State of CT shall pay forthwith Christina Crowe total sum of $3,288.16. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/22/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 04/22/2004)
399 ENDORSEMENT ORDER granting 396 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney William H. Narwold terminated. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/22/04. (Wiggins, M.) (Entered: 04/23/2004)
400 ORDER State of Connecticut shall pay forthwith Christina Crowe the total sum of $3,294.88. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/7/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 06/07/2004)
401 ORDER State of Connecticut shall pay forthwith Donald W. DeVore the total sum of $5,097.16. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/8/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 06/08/2004)
402 ORDER re: State of Connecticut shall pay forthwith Christina Crowe the total sum of $3,093.58. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/28/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 06/29/2004)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 45 of 49

07/01/2004 07/12/2004 07/23/2004 07/28/2004 07/30/2004 08/19/2004 08/20/2004 08/20/2004
09/15/2004 09/16/2004 09/17/2004 09/21/2004 10/16/2004 10/18/2004 11/01/2004

403 AMENDED ORDER State of CT shall pay forthwith Christina Crowe the total sum of $3,294.88 . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/30/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 07/02/2004)
404 MOTION for Extension of Time of up to one year for SUPPLEMENTAL ORDER & JOINT CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN by Matt A., Mark B., Ramon C., Emily J., Paul M., Ricardo M., William R., Michael T.. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 07/13/2004)
405 ORDER State of Connecticut shall pay forthwith Donald W. DeVore the total sum of $7,805.83. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/23/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 07/23/2004)
406 MOTION for Extension of Time until 8/20/04 to File Response to 404 MOTION for Extension of Time by Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, James A. Connelly, Peter Dobson, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, David May, Reginald Mayo, Aaron Ment Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Lowell P. Weicker Jr.. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 07/29/2004)
407 Endorsement ORDER granting 406 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to 404 MOTION for Extension of Time for Joint Corrective Action Plan (JCAP)Responses due by 8/20/2004. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/30/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 08/02/2004)
408 ORDER re: State of CT shall reimburse Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe, for services rendered in June & July in the amount of $9,083.88. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/19/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 08/23/2004)
409 Memorandum in Opposition re 404 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, James A. Connelly, Peter Dobson, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, David May, Reginald Mayo, Aaron Ment Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Lowell P. Weicker Jr.. (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 08/23/2004)
410 INDEX OF EVIDENCE by Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, James A. Connelly, Peter Dobson, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, David May, Reginald Mayo, Aaron Ment Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Lowell P. Weicker Jr.. Related document: 404 MOTION for Extension of Time filed by Emily J., William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Ricardo M.. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavits & Exhibits manually filed)(Bauer, J.) Modified on 9/17/2004 (D'Onofrio, B.). (Entered: 08/23/2004)
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert N. Chatigny : Status Conference held on 9/15/2004. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 09/16/2004)
411 USCA Scheduling Order as to 274 Notice of Appeal, filed by Lowell P. Weicker, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, 275 Notice of Appeal, filed by Leonard Barbieri, Leo C. Arnone, Aaron Ment, Peter Dobson, David May. USCA Number: 02−7311(L) & 02−7319 (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 09/21/2004)
DOCKET ENTRY CORRECTION... 410 Index of Evidence modified: For clarification of Index of Evidence as opposed to Index to Record on Appeal. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 09/17/2004)
412 ORDER State of Connecticut shall reimburse Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe for services rendered in August in the amount of $8,061.00. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/21/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 09/22/2004)
414 NOTICE Reinstatement of Appeal and Scheduling Order received from USCA. Roseann B. MacKechnie, Clerk (Warren, C.) (Entered: 10/27/2004)
413 MOTION to Modify 318 Order for Supplemental Relief by Matt A., Mark B., Ramon C., Emily J., Paul M., Ricardo M., William R., Michael T..Responses due by 11/8/2004 (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 10/18/2004)
415 ORDER State of Connecticut shall reimburse Court−appointed Monitoring Panel Member, Christina Crowe, for services rendered in September in the amount of $5,193.00. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/31/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 11/01/2004)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 46 of 49

11/02/2004 11/12/2004
12/06/2004 12/29/2004 01/20/2005 01/21/2005 02/03/2005 02/24/2005 02/25/2005 04/25/2005 05/23/2005 06/20/2005 06/20/2005 06/28/2005
07/08/2005 07/08/2005

416 Letter from State of Connecticut Dated 10/7/04 Re: Appointment of Dr. Robert L. Carl Jr as Monitor (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 11/03/2004)
417 MANDATE of USCA (certified copy)dated 11/4/04 dismissing appeals pursuant to stipulation as to 274 Notice of Appeal, filed by Lowell P. Weicker, Vincent Ferrandino, Rose Alma Senatore, 275 Notice of Appeal, filed by Leonard Barbieri, Leo C. Arnone, Aaron Ment, Peter Dobson, David May (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 11/16/2004)
418 ORDER − State of Connecticut will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Christina Crowe for services rendered in October in the amount of $7,922.00 . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/6/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 12/07/2004)
419 ORDER State of Connecticut will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered...in October & November in the amount of $5,852.30. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/28/04. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 12/30/2004)
420 ORDER State of Connecticut will reimburse Monitoring panel Member Christina Crowe for services rendered in November in the amount of $6,050.. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/19/05. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 01/20/2005)
421 Endorsement ORDER terminating 404 Motion for Extension of Time, granting 413 Motion to Modify . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/21/05. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 01/24/2005)
422 ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEYS' FEES & COSTS: In accordance with Stipulation Defendant shall pay total of $55,709.50 to Center for Children's Advocacy Inc & Center for Public Representation . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2/3/05. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 02/03/2005)
423 ORDER: State of CT will reimburse Robert Carl in the amount of $6,319.05. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2/23/05. (Basile, F.) (Entered: 02/28/2005)
424 ORDER State of Connecticut will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Christina Crowe for services rendered in December in the amount of $2,443.50. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 2/25/05. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 02/28/2005)
425 ORDER re: State of Connecticut will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered from 2/15 to 3/14/05 in the amount of $4,870.64. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 4/24/05. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 04/26/2005)
426 ORDER The State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl Jr. for services rendered from 3/15−4/25/05 in the amount of $4,300.00. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/20/05. (D'Onofrio, B.) (Entered: 05/24/2005)
427 ORDER directing notice of proposed settlement of class action. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/20/05. (Montgomery, A.) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/11/2005 (Montgomery, A.). (Entered: 06/20/2005)
428 LEGAL NOTICE of proposed settlement of class action signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Montgomery, A.) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/11/2005 (Montgomery, A.). (Entered: 06/20/2005)
429 NOTICE OF E−FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Fairness Hearing set for 7/8/2005 09:00 AM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 06/28/2005)
430 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert N. Chatigny: Fairness Hearing held on 7/8/2005. Settlement approved. (Court Reporter Darlene Warner.) (Walker, J.) (Entered: 07/08/2005)
431 AFFIDAVIT Signed By Margaret Q. Chapple filed by Anthony J. Salius, Peter Dobson, Donald Konefal, Mark Guasta, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, Reginald Mayo, Lowell P. Weicker, Jr, Aaron Ment, Jr. (Montgomery, A.) (Entered: 07/08/2005)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 47 of 49

07/12/2005 09/06/2005 09/21/2005 10/06/2005
11/17/2005 01/11/2006
01/17/2006 01/30/2006
02/27/2006
02/28/2006 03/03/2006
03/03/2006 03/06/2006 03/21/2006
04/12/2006

432 ORDER in accordance with 177 Order on Motion for Judgment dated 2/6/97 State of CT. will reimburse monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered from 5/9 to 6/12/05 in the amount of $6659.46 . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/11/05. (Montgomery, A.) (Entered: 07/12/2005)
433 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 7/8/05 before Judge Chatigny. Court Reporter: Darlene A. Warner. (Montgomery, A.) (Entered: 09/06/2005)
434 ORDER State of Connecticut will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member, Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered from 6/15 to 9/1 in the amount of $3,170.80. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/21/05. (Montgomery, A.) (Entered: 09/21/2005)
435 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT by Peter Dobson, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo, Ricardo M., Emily J., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May, William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker, Jr, Aaron Ment, Jr. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 10/06/2005)
436 ORDER regarding Plaintiffs Attorneys' Fess & Costs. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/17/05. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 11/18/2005)
437 NOTICE OF E−FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference set for 1/26/2006 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 01/11/2006)
438 ORDER: State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Christina Crowe for Services rendered from 11/10 − 12/13/05 in the amount of $5,084.18. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/16/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 01/18/2006)
439 NOTICE OF E−FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference moved from 1/26/06 to 2/23/2006 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 01/30/2006)
440 NOTICE OF E−FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE.ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference moved from 2/23/06 to 2/28/2006 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 02/27/2006)
441 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert N. Chatigny : Status Conference held on 2/28/2006. Total Time: 2 hours (Walker, J.) (Entered: 03/01/2006)
442 Joint MOTION for an Order approving Dr. Carl's proposal concerning the Court Monitor's budget, hourly rate, allowable expenses & periodic invoices by Peter Dobson, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo, Ricardo M., Emily J., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May, William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker, Jr, Aaron Ment, Jr. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 03/06/2006)
443 ENDORSEMENT ORDER granting 442 Joint Motion for an Order approving Dr. Carl's proposal. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/3/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 03/06/2006)
444 ORDER . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/6/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 03/06/2006)
445 NOTICE OF E−FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference set for 4/12/2006 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 03/21/2006)
446 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert N. Chatigny : Status Conference held on 4/12/2006. (35 minutes) (Walker, J.) (Entered: 04/12/2006)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 48 of 49

05/26/2006 05/31/2006 05/31/2006 06/12/2006
07/31/2006 07/31/2006 08/22/2006 09/22/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 11/30/2006 12/01/2006 12/07/2006 12/12/2006 12/20/2006 03/27/2007 03/28/2007 07/19/2007

447 MOTION for Wendi J. Kemp to Withdraw as Attorney by Reginald Mayo. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 05/26/2006)
448 ORDER granting 447 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Wendi J. Kemp terminated . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/30/06. (Montgomery, A.) (Entered: 05/31/2006)
449 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/31/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 05/31/2006)
450 NOTICE OF E−FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference set for 6/29/2006 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 06/12/2006)
451 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Christina Crowe for services rendered . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/31/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 08/01/2006)
452 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/31/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 08/01/2006)
453 ORDER − State of CT to reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Christina Crowe for services rendered from 5/4/06 − 7/20/06. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/22/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 08/22/2006)
454 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered from 8/17−26/2006 . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/21/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 09/25/2006)
455 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Christina Crowe for services rendered from 8/1−9/15/06. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/29/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 12/01/2006)
456 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Christina Crowe for services rendered from 10/3−5/06 . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/29/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 12/01/2006)
457 − ENTERED IN ERROR − ORDER DISMISSING CASE . Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/28/06. (Ferguson, L.) Modified on 12/1/2006 (Ferguson, L.). (Entered: 12/01/2006)
Docket Entry Correction re 457 Order Dismissing Case: Docket entry made on the wrong case (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 12/01/2006)
Docket Annotation − retransmission of entries for 12/1/06 re 456 Order, 457 Order Dismissing Case, 455 Order (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 12/07/2006)
458 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/12/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 12/12/2006)
459 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr for services rendered from 8/31−10/25/06. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 12/19/06. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 12/21/2006)
460 ORDER re: reimbursement of monitor. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/27/07. (Bauer, J.) (Entered: 03/28/2007)
461 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert N. Chatigny : Status Conference held on 3/28/2007. Total Time: 3 hours and 10 minutes (Walker, J.) (Entered: 03/28/2007)
462 NOTICE OF E−FILED CALENDAR: THIS IS THE ONLY NOTICE COUNSEL/THE PARTIES WILL RECEIVE. ALL PERSONS ENTERING THE COURTHOUSE MUST PRESENT PHOTO IDENTIFICATION. Status Conference set for 7/26/2007 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom Three, 450 Main St., Hartford, CT before Judge Robert N. Chatigny. (Walker, J.) (Entered: 07/19/2007)

Case: 3:93-cv-1944 As of: 02/23/2016 10:07 PM EST 49 of 49

07/26/2007 07/26/2007 07/30/2007 07/30/2007 09/26/2007
09/28/2007
01/29/2008 01/30/2008

463 MOTION for Thomas P. O'Dea, Jr. to Withdraw as Attorney by T. Josiha Haig. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 07/26/2007)
464 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Robert N. Chatigny : Status Conference held on 7/26/2007. Total Time: 2 hours and 10 minutes (Walker, J.) (Entered: 07/27/2007)
465 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered from 4/20/07 to 7/12/07. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/30/07. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 08/01/2007)
466 ORDER re 463 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Thomas P. O'Dea, Jr terminated. Granted. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/30/07. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 08/01/2007)
467 STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES by Peter Dobson, Rose Alma Senatore, Vincent Ferrandino, T. Josiha Haig, James A. Connelly, Reginald Mayo, Ricardo M., Emily J., Leo C. Arnone, Leonard Barbieri, David May, William R., Matt A., Ramon C., Michael T., Mark B., Paul M., Lowell P. Weicker, Jr, Aaron Ment, Jr. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 09/27/2007)
468 ORDER Approving and So ordering 467 Stipulation of the Parties, filed by Aaron Ment, Jr., Rose Alma Senatore, Emily J., Michael T., James A. Connelly, Leo C. Arnone, Matt A., Vincent Ferrandino, Paul M., Ricardo M., David May, Ramon C., Reginald Mayo, Leonard Barbieri, T. Josiha Haig, Lowell P. Weicker, Jr., Peter Dobson, William R., Mark B. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/28/07. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 09/28/2007)
469 ORDER − State of CT will reimburse Monitoring Panel Member Dr. Robert L. Carl, Jr. for services rendered from 7/16/07 to 8/21/07 in the amount of $2,932.41. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/29/08. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 01/30/2008)
470 ORDER Regarding Plaintiffs' Attorneys' Fees and Costs; GRANTED. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/30/08. (Ferguson, L.) (Entered: 01/30/2008)