UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN D1VISION

MIRNA E, SERRANO, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v
CINTAS CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation,
Defendant,
James K. Fett (P39461) Niclaolas Roumel (P37056) Lawrence A. Fields (P66086) Fett, Roumel & Fields, P.C. 805 East Main Pinckney, MI 48169 (734.) 954-0100 Attonleys for Plaintiff

File No. 04 Hon,
PAUL

William G, Tishkoff (P451651)

FILED Tishkoff & Goudsmit PLLC
407 N Main St

Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077

MAY 1 0 200k

Attorneys for Plaintiff

GLERK’S OFFICE U,$. DISTRICT GOURT
ANN ARBOR, MI

COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs, through counsel, state the following complaint against Defendant:
NATURE OF CLAIM 1. This is a gender discrimination class action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendamt to redress the violation of the rights of the Plaintiff and the class she represents under the CNil Rights of Act of 1964, 42 USC §2000(e) et se~.~., as amended in 1991 (hereafter "Title VII").

C:\[)ocum~mts and Settings\ Maureen\ L~,-d Se[lings\Tempor~,ry Interact Nles\cont~ent.IF_5\SLWLYNSl\Serrann--Cintas 050604

fed class action cmplt.doc

]

2. Plaintiff also seeks compensatory and punitive damages against Defendant to redress

the violation of the rights of the Plaintiff and the class she represents under Title VII. JURISDICTION AND PARTIES

3. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 USC §1331, 1343 (a)(3),

1343(a)(4), 2201 and 2202 and Title VII. 4. Jurisdiction to grant injtmetive and declaratory equitable relief as well as dmnages is

invoked pursuant to 42 USC §2000(e) - (5)(0,

All or most of the events giving rise to this action occurred in the Eastern District of

Michigan. 6.

The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00. ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS

7. Plaintiff liled an EEOC charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity

Conmaissio~ (’EEOC") alleging gender discrimination in hiring against Defendant on or about April

7, 2000. 8.

Although Plaintiffrcpcated requested a fight to sue letter from the EEOC, the EEOC

has declined to issue the fight to sue letter. See February 17, 2004 and May 6, 2004 letters to

EEOC, collectively attached as Exhibit A. DISCRIMINATION AI~LEGATIONS

9. At all material times, Defendant was an employer covered by and within the meaning of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII), as anaended.

10. Plaintiff is a female job applicant that applied 3 times for the position of Route Sales

Driver/Services Sales Representative ("Driver") with Defendant between July 1999 through March

C:\ IN x:umex~.ts and Settings\ Mauree~\ Local .¢a:t ting.~\ Temporary lnternet Files\ Ctmtent.IF_5\SLWLY BS1 \Serraon--C.intas 050604

fed cbass acron cmplt,doc

2

2000 at two of Defendant’s facilities in Michigan: twice at Defendant’s Westl0aad t~eility and once

at Defendant’s Sterling Heights facility. 11. Defendant rejected Plaintiff’s applications despite the fact that she was well

qualified for the position.

12. 13. gender.

Defendant hired males for the Driver position which Plaintiffappl~ed for. Defendant rejecled Plaintiff’s applications for the Driver position because o1" her

14. Plaintiff filed a charge of gender discrimination with tlae EEOC on April

7,2000.
15. The EEOC investigated Plaintiff’s charge and on July 3, 2002 issued a
determination that:
Evidence gathered during the course of the investigation reveals that there is reasonable cause to believe that the Charging Party’s allegations are true. Furthermore, like and related and growing out of this investigation, there is reasonable cause to believe that the Respondent has discriminated against females as a class by failing to hire them as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended.

16. As a result of Defendant’s practice and policy of discriminating against women as

a class by denying them employment as route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives,

Plaintiff and similarly situated females have been denied employment opportunities afforded to males.

CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS

17. Plaintiff restates and incorporates by reference the allegations contained in the

previous paragraphs of this Complaint.

18. The class is defined as all women who:

C:\Documents and Settings\Maureen\l.,ocal ,~tfings\Temporary Internet Files\Content,IFS\SLWLYBSl\Berrao~--Cintas 050604

fed class ~fion cmplt,doc

3

a. applied for Route Driver/Services Sales Representative positions in Michigan from July, 1999 through the date that judgment is entered herein; mad were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives.
19. Plaintiff seeks to maintain this class, pursttant to Rules 23(b) and 23(c)(4), on the issues of whether Defendant engaged in unlawful discrimination and whether Defendant should be enjoined from continuing their discriminatory policies.
20. The class is comprised of over 100 persons who applied for driver positions in Michigan and therefore joindcr of all members is impracticable.
21. Common questions of fact and law exist as to all members of the Class and predominate over any questions solely affecting individual members el" the Class; mnong the questions of law aad fact in common to the Class is whether Defendant violated Title VII by discriminating against the class members in hiring based on their gender and whether they will continue to do so.
22. Plaintiffs claim is typical of the claims of the members of the Class and she is an adequate representative of the Class.
23. Plaintiff and members of the Class have sustained damages because of Defendant’s’ unlawful activities herein.
24. Plaintiff has retained counsel competent and experienced in gender discrimination litigation and intends to prosecute this action vigorously.
25. Plaintiffwill fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class. WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests (1) class certification; (2) declaratory relief
recognizing that Defendant has illegally discriminated agai~t her and members el’the class
I. l:\JlM\CLIENT\Serrano\Sen’aoa~.-Cmt~s 05060,4 fed class action cmplt.doc
4

based on their gender in violation of Title VII; (3) injtmctive relief prohibiting the col~.sideration

of gender in hiring and ending the discriminatory policies described herein; (4) otller equitable

relief including, but not limited to, reinstatement; (5)judgment against Defendant in an anaount

in excess of" $75,00&00 for their economic and non-economic injuries; (6) aa award of costs,

interest and attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988, and (7) punitive damages.

Respectfully submitted,

FETT, ROUMEL & FIELDS, P.C.

TISHKOFF & GOUDSMIT PLLC

B.~o?aaess Rl~ou. mFeel~(tP(3P7~05964)6 Lawrence A. Fields (P66084) 805 East Main Pinckaaey, MI 48169 (734) 954-0100 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated "7 day of May, 2004

By: "~¢[l[i~n G. Tishkof~(P45i6:~l 7~.~’d/~. ~.~.~’

407 N Main St

c5/,¢~’’94 .....

Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158

(734) 663-4077 Attorneys for Plaintiff

C:\D~n:ument5 and Settmgs\Mau.reen\ Local Settings\Tempt~r~ry Internet File~\Contertt,IES\SLWLYBSl\ Serra~m-Cintas 050~4

fed daas at:~m cmplt, doc

5

JURY DEMAND

NOW COMES the Plaintiff, through counsel, and hereby demands trial by jury in the above

captioned matter.

Respectfully submitted,

FETT, ROUMEL & FIELDS, P.C.

TISHKOFF & GOUDSMIT, PLLC

.~hoamlaess KR.oFu~mtte(lp(NP3I379045661)) Lawrence A, Fields (P66084) 805 East Main Pinckney, MI 48169 (734) 954-0100 Attorneys for Plaintiff
Dated ---~./Z~,, day of May, 2004

.l~y~ Willidm 407 N Main St

G.

Tist~off

(P45_1,6f~f/,/,cc,,,~¢c’,d)Nf~-~’~_

.....

Ann Arbor, MI 48104-I 158

(7341) 663~4077 Attorneys l’or Plaintiff

C:\ Docaments and N~ttlngs\ Mm~reen\ Local Settings\ TempOrary Internet Files\ Content, lES\ SLWLYB.’:Jl \ Serr~on--Cm tas 050~4

fed c lass ac ~ion tuaaplt,duc

6

WILLIAM G. "I’|SHKOF[r A. POPPY GOUDSMIT

TISHKOFF & GOUDSMIT PLLC
TRIAL ATTORNF, YS AND COUNSELORS 407 NORTH MAIN STREET
ANN ARI~OR, MICn[GAN 48104 TEL C~34) 663-~077 FAX (734) 66~-]613 www.tl¢hkoffl~w,¢oltt

WRITEWS EMAIL~ ~v~l[(g~tlshkofflaw.¢em

May 6, 2004

DAN IEL TISH KOFF IT MANAGER/PARALEGAL

VIA FAX [313-226-2778] & U,S, MAIL James R, Neely, Jr.
District Director U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Detroit District Office 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865
Detroit, MI 48226-9704

Re~ Charging Party: Employer: EEOC Charge #:

Mirna Serrano Cintas 230A00845

Dear Mr, Neely:

By letter to yon dated February 17, 2004, signaed by my client, Mima Serrano, Ms.
Serrano confirmed her request for notice of right to sue by private action in court. The above letter stated, in pertinent part:

On or about January 22, 2002, the undersigned, William G. Tishkoff, Esq,, appeared in the above-referenced matter on behalf of Charging Party Mima Serrano. On July 3, 2002, you issued a Determination in the above-referenced matter, on behalfofthe Commission, finding reasonable cause to believe that Ms. Serrano’s allegations of discrimination are true and that Cintas discriminated against females as a class by failing to hire them as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives in violation of Title VII. Women discriminated by Cintas as a class, in addition to Ms. Serrano, are identified in the proposed Conciliation Agreement issued along with the above Determination.~ Since the above Determination, Ms. Serrano has not received an acceptable settlement offer from Cintas - indeed, Ms. Serrano has not received any settlement offer from Cintas nor has Cintas made any offers of compensation or remediation with respect to the above class of women.
Ms. Serrano greatly appreciates the investigation and work performed by the EEOC on her behalf and on behalf of the class of women discriminated against by Cintas. However, please be advised that Ms. Serrano intends to initiate

These women include, without limitation, the 61 women at the Cintas Westland facility, and the 51 women at the Cintas Madison Heights facility, identified in the EEOC’s proposed Conciliation Agreement.

James R. Neely, Jr. May 6, 2004
Page 2
a class action lawsuit in federal court, ba~ed on gender discrimination in violation of Title VI1, inter alia, against Cintas, on Ms. Serrano’s individual behalf and on behalf of the class of women discriminated against by Cintas. Ms. Serrano therefore respectfully requests that the EEOC issue her a notice of right to sue under Title VII, on Ms. Serrano’s individual behalf and on behalf of the elass of women discriminated against by Cintas. The original or a copy of the notice of fight to sue for Ms. Serrano should be provided, at yoar earliest convenience, to the undersigned at the address indicated in the above letterhead.
Following the provision of the above letter I engaged in several of discussion with representatives of the EEOC, including EEOC attorney Gall D. Cober on a number of occasions and you and Ms. Cober on April 22, 2004, In all of these conferences with the EEOC, the EEOC acknowledged receipt of Ms. Serrano’s request for notice of right to sue and I indicated that Ms. Serrano continues to request the issuance of notice of right to sue. Although I greatly respect the legal abilities and capabilities of you and Ms. Cober, Ms. Serrano intends to file a private lawsuit seeking class certification and her request for right to sue should be honored without delay.
Very truly yours,

WGT/dt
Cc~ Frances Angiano Gail D. Cober, Esq, Mima Serrano

William G. Tishkoff

WTLLIAM G, TISHKOFF Poppy GOUI)$M IT

TISHKOFF & GOUDSMIT PLLC
TRIAL A’[TORN EYS AND COUNSELORS 407 NORTH MAIN STREET
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN 48104 TEL (734) 6~3-4077 FAX (734) 665-1613 www.tlsh ko fllaw.eom

DANIEL TISiIKOI.’F PH,D. IT MANAGER/PARALEGAL

WRITER’S EMAIL: will(~ishkofllaw.om

February 17, 2004

VIA FAX [313-226-,2778] & U,S, MAIL James R. Neely, Jr.
District Director
U.S, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Detroit District Office 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865
Detroit, MI 48226-9704

Re: Charging Party:
Employs: EEOC Charge #:

Mima Serrano Cintas 230A00845

Dear Mr, Neely:

On or about January 22, 2002, the undersigned, Williarn G. Tishkoff, Esq,, appeared in the above-referenced matter on behalf of Charging Party Mima Serrano. On July 3, 2002, you issued a Determination in the above-referenced matter, on behalf of the Commission., finding reasonable cause to believe that Ms. Serrano’s allegations of discrimination are true and that Cintas discriminated against females as a class by failing to hire them as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives in violation of Title VII, Women discriminated by Cintas as a class, in addition to Ms. Serrano, are id,entified in the proposed Conciliation Agreement issued along with the above Determination,’ Since the above Determination, Ms, Serrano has
not received an acceptable settlement offer from Cintas - indeed, Ms, Serrano has not received m~y settlement offer from Cintas - nor has Cintas made any offers of compensation or remediation with respect to the above class of women.

Ms. Serrano greatly appreciates the investigation and work performed by the EEOC on
her behalf and on behalf of the class of women discriminated against by Cintas. However, please be advised that Ms, Serrano intends to initiate a class action lawsuit in federal court, based on gender discrimination in violation of Title VII, inter alia, against Cintas, on Ms, Serrano’s individual behalf and on behalf of the class of women discriminated against by Cintas. Ms, Serrano therefore respectfully requests that the EEOC issue her a notice of right to sue under
Title VII, on Ms, Serrano’s individual behalf and on behalf of the class of women discriminated against by Cintas. The original or a copy of the notice of fight to sue for Ms. Serrano should be

~ These women include, without limitation, the 61 women at the Cintas Westland facility, and the 5 l women at the Cintas Madison Heights facility, identified in the EEOC’s proposed Conciliation Agreement.

James R, Neely, Jr. February 17, 2004 Page 2 provided, at your earliest convenience, to the undersigned at the address indicated in the above letterhead.
We appreciate your time and eonsideratiort. Very truly yours,
William G. Ti~hkoff WGT/dt
Request for notice of right to sue authorized and confirmed by Mirna Serrano.
Mima sl/’r~ano Date: February 17,200~ Frances Angiano

JS 44 I/9e CIVIL COVER SHEET cOU.rY N W. c.’r. SACT ONAROSE; W,.. yne

The J$-44 civil cover sheet and the information contained I~ereln neither replace nor supplement the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as requireQ

by law. except as provided by local rules of court. This form, approved toy the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974. is required for use of the Clerk of Court for the purpose ef Initiating the civil docket sheet,

I. (a) PLAINTIFFS
Mirna Serrano 42480 Beechwood Canton, MI 48188

DEFENDANTS
Cintas Corporation 39415 Wcbb Drive Westland, MI 48185

ORIGINAL

(b) Count~ of Residence of First Listed

Wayne

Wayne County of ResidenCe of First Listed

(C) Attorney’s (Firm Name, Addness. and Telephone Number}

NOTE: IN LAND CONDEMNATION CASES, USE THE LOCATION OF THE

I,AN#,LNVOLVED.

. ......

-.

Attorneys (if Known}

James K. Fett, 805 E. Main St., Pinckney, M148169 734-

954-0100 & William G. Tishkoff, 407 N. Main St., Ann

Axbor. MI 48104 734-663-4077 II. BASIS OF JU~"x" in One BOx Only)

IIi, CITIZENSHIP OF PRINCIPAL PARTIES (Pl~e ~n ’w’ In One Box for Plaintiff

(For Diversity Cases Only)

and On~ Box for Delsndant}

PL~ DEF

PLA DEF

~ 1 U,S, Governme~,.,u~stion

Plaintiff

(U.S, Government Not a Party]

Citlzen of This State [] 1 D 1

Incorporated or Pr~ncipal Place [] 4 [] 4 of Business In This State

L-~ 2 u.s. Government Defendant

~--1 4 Diversity (Indicate Citizenship of Par~ie~ in Ite~ 111)

Citizen of Ano~er [] 2 [] 2

Incorperatedarm’Prinolpal D 5 [] ,5 of Bu61neas In Another Sta~

Citizen or Subject of a [] 3 [] 3

Foreign Nation

Fer#ign g?eqVY ................

IV, NATURE OF SUIT
CONTRACT, .......

{Place an "X" in One B.ox..Only) TORTS

FORFE IT ORE / ~,,ENALT Y BANKRUPTCY

OTHER STATUTES

~’1 1 1 0 Insurance [-J 120 Mar[n~ I’~ 130 MillerAet ~ 140 Negotiable In.Strument LJ 150 Re~ve~ of
~vFrp~ent ~nmreement of Judg~
~ 151 Medicar~

PERSONAL INJURY [] 31 0/,#plans [] 315 Airplane Product
klsl~llity
320 Assault Libel And Slander
[] 330 Federal Ern~loyer~’

Student Loans (E~. ~ 153 Re~ of Veteran’s B~n~t~
"~ t90 O~er Contract ~ 195 ¢ontr~ @mdumt Liability
~’~AL PROPERTY

~0 Marine ~5 Marine Pf~u~
Lla~ll;ty 350 M~o~Vehi~e 355 M~or V~hi~o
Ptodu~ Liability 360 Ot~er Personal
Injury
CiVl L RIGHTS

C’l 210 Land condemn~

[] 220 Foreclosure ~ IRI 442 Employm~

~ 230 Re~t Lsa~e & ~ectme~t ~ 240 T~ds Io ~and

~ A~mm~at~ons

~ 245 Ted PrOdu~ Li=bility ~ 444 Waif am

~ 290 AI~ Olhar Real Propedy ~ 440 Other Civil Rights

PERSONAL INJURY [] 36~ personal Injury-
Mad. Malpractice
[] 365 Pemonal.ln~rv-

610 Agriculture 620 Other Food & Drug 625 Drag R~e~
630 Liquor

[] 422 Appe=l 2S U$C 15B
[] 4~3 Wilhdrawal 26 IJSC

~.61] A~,beatoa .I;’ersonsl Iojury Prsduct

640 R.R. &

PROPERTY RIGHTS

Liability
PI~R~IONAL PROPERTY rl 370 Other Fraud

650 Airlino
660 Occupational Softy/Health
690 Other

[] 820 Copyrights [] 8~,0 Patent [] 840 Trademark

[] 371 Truth in L~ndi~ [] ~BO Other Personal

LABOR

Proper~y Damage [] 3S5 ~raperty Damage
Product Liability

[] 71 0 F&Ir Labor Standards Act
r- 720 Labor/Mgmt.

Ralatioe$

PRISONER PETITION’S’"

730 Lmbor/Mgrnt. RapC, rting

SOCIAL SECURITY
[] ~t H Ik (1 395[t) [] 862 Black Lung (923) [] as3 I~WCIDIV¢~,/ [] 864 8,$10 T~Ie XVI

~ 51 0 Motions to Vacate
"~ Sentence .----"Ha~eas Corpus:
[] 530 General [] SBS Death Penalty

[] 740 R=llw=y LaborAct

FEDERAL TAX. SUITS

7~0 Other Labor Litiga~io.

[] 670 Taxes (U.B. Plaintiff o~ D~ondant)

[j 540 Man~B & Other [] 791 Empl. Ret. lnc.

~ 55~ Civil Rights

Security Act

[] 871 IR,,~-Thire Paay 26 USC 7609

~ 555 Prison Condition

~ 400 State Reapporlionment D 41 0 Antitrust [] 430 Banks and Banking [] 450 Commeme./ICC [] 460 DepodatiOn
[] 470 Racketeer larluer~ed Com,~pt Orgeni~a~i~;~-,s
;[] 610 ~eleC, tlve Servlca !D 8~0 Sscu ritiea£o~ mud It]as;
Exmhanga :lTI 875 Customer Challenge
12 LI$C 3410 [] 691 Agrlculturm ’ [] e92 ~:¢mnomic Stabiliza(Jbn Act [] 893 Environmental Mstter~; [] 894 Energy Allocation Act I~ 895 Fn~cdom ~f
nformat on Act [] £z,00 Al~peal of Foe
O~temlinetion Und~w Equal Access to Ju.~ti¢~
~ 950 Constitutionality Of State Statutes
~ ego Olher Stsl.u[o:y Actions

r~l ,,,~ i i’l z/~m,~..,*,
~1 ~iginal D

(PLACE AN "X" tN ONE BOX ONLY)

2 Remo~d from

3

4 Rel~st~le~

Tranaferr~,d from _. snorer district
5 (~p~c~)

[] 6 Multi district Litigation

V CAUSE OF ACTION (o t~h~ ~.$ Civil ~t~t~ under whic~ you~rs ilion9 and write bHef statement of cause,
uo n~ cm~e jurisdi~ional

App¢td to DiStrict
7 Judge tmrn D MaglBtrate

Gender discrimination i~lation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of [964.

COMP~INT: ~a~ ~,~,c,e,

{See
VIII. RE~TED CASE(8) instructions):

IF ANY

JUDGE

~HECK YE~. only if deman~in o0mplaint: JURY DEMA~,.~ ~ No
DOCKET NUMBER

PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 83.11

1,

Is this a case that has been previously dismissed?

If yes, give the following information:

Co u rt:

Case No,:

Judge:

Other than stated above, are there any pending or previously discontinued or dismissed companion cases in this or any other .~,,,L.~ court, including state court? (Companion cases are matters in w)~i-ch ~! Nm,~"l it appears substantially similar evidence will be offered or the s e~...~.~_~ or related parties are present and the cases arise out of the same transaction or occurrence.)
If yes, give the following information:
Court:
Case No.:
Judge:
Notes :

 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIRNA E. SERRANO, STEFANIE L. MCVAY, and LINDA D. ALLEN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v
CINTAS CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation,
Defendant.

File No. 04-cv-40132 Hon. Paul V. Gadola

James K. Fett (P39461) Nicholas Roumel (P37056) Lawrence A. Fields (P66086) Fett, Roumel & Fields, P.C. 805 East Main Pinckney, MI 48169 (734) 954-0100 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

William G. Tishkoff (P45165) A. Poppy Goudsmit (P61944) Tishkoff & Goudsmit PLLC 407 North Main Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs, through counsel, state the following complaint against Defendant:
NATURE OF CLAIM 1. This is a gender discrimination class action for declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendant to redress the violation of the rights of the Plaintiffs and the class they represent under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 USC §2000(e) et seq., as amended in 1991 (hereafter “Title VII”).

1

2. Plaintiffs seek compensatory and punitive damages against Defendant to redress the violation of the rights of the Plaintiffs and the class they represent under Title VII.
JURISDICTION AND PARTIES 3. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343 (a)(3), 1343(a)(4), 2201 and 2202 and Title VII. 4. Jurisdiction to grant injunctive and declaratory equitable relief as well as damages is invoked pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §2000(e) - (5)(f). 5. All or most of the events giving rise to this action occurred in the Eastern District of Michigan. 6. The amount in controversy exceeds $75,000.00.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS 7. Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano filed an EEOC charge with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) alleging gender discrimination in hiring against Defendant on or about April 7, 2000. 8. The EEOC subsequently issued Ms. Serrano notice of her right to sue (a “right to sue letter”).
DISCRIMINATION ALLEGATIONS 9. At all material times, Defendant was an employer covered by and within the meaning of Title VII. 10. Ms. Serrano is a female job applicant that applied 3 times for the position of Route Sales Driver/Services Sales Representative (“Driver”) with Defendant between July 1999 and March 2000 at two of Defendant’s facilities in Michigan: twice at Defendant’s Westland facility and once at Defendant’s Madison Heights facility.
2

11. Plaintiff Stefanie L. McVay is a female job applicant that applied at Defendant’s Westland facility for the position of Driver during the same time frame as Ms. Serrano.
12. Plaintiff Linda D. Allen is a female job applicant that applied at Defendant’s Madison Heights facility for the position of Driver during the same time frame as Ms. Serrano.
13. Defendant rejected Plaintiffs’ applications despite the fact that each Plaintiff was well qualified for the Driver positions.
14. Defendant hired males for the Driver positions which Plaintiffs applied for. 15. Defendant rejected Plaintiffs’ applications for the Driver positions because of their gender. 16. Ms. Serrano filed a charge of gender discrimination with the EEOC on April 7, 2000. 17. The EEOC investigated Ms. Serrano’s charge and on July 3, 2002 issued a determination that:
Evidence gathered during the course of the investigation reveals that there is reasonable cause to believe that the Charging Party’s allegations are true. Furthermore, like and related and growing out of this investigation, there is reasonable cause to believe that the Respondent has discriminated against females as a class by failing to hire them as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. 18. As a result of Defendant’s practice and policy of discriminating against women as a class by denying them employment as route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives, Plaintiffs and similarly situated females have been denied employment opportunities afforded to males.
CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
3

19. Plaintiffs restate and incorporate by reference the allegations contained in the previous paragraphs of this Complaint.
20. The class is defined as all women who: a. applied for Route Driver/Services Sales Representative positions in Michigan from July, 1999 through the date that judgment is entered herein; and b. were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives.
21. Plaintiffs seek to maintain this class, pursuant to Rules 23(b) and 23(c)(4), on the issues of whether Defendant engaged in unlawful discrimination and whether Defendant should be enjoined from continuing their discriminatory policies.
22. The class is comprised of over 100 persons who applied for driver positions in Michigan and therefore joinder of all members is impracticable.
23. Common questions of fact and law exist as to all members of the Class and predominate over any questions solely affecting individual members of the Class; among the questions of law and fact in common to the Class is whether Defendant violated Title VII by discriminating against the class members in hiring based on their gender and whether they will continue to do so.
24. Plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims of the members of the Class and they are adequate representatives of the Class.
25. Plaintiffs and members of the Class have sustained damages because of Defendant’s unlawful activities herein.
26. Plaintiffs have retained counsel competent and experienced in gender discrimination litigation and intend to prosecute this action vigorously.
27. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class.
4

TITLE VII ALLEGATIONS

WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs request (1) class certification; (2) declaratory relief

recognizing that Defendant has illegally discriminated against them and members of the class

based on their gender in violation of Title VII; (3) injunctive relief prohibiting the consideration

of gender in hiring and ending the discriminatory policies described herein; (4) other equitable

relief including, but not limited to, reinstatement; (5) judgment against Defendant in an amount

in excess of $75,000.00 for their economic and non-economic injuries; (6) an award of costs,

interest and attorney fees pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1988, and (7) punitive damages.

Respectfully submitted,

FETT, ROUMEL & FIELDS, P.C.

TISHKOFF & GOUDSMIT PLLC

/s James K. Fett By: James K. Fett (P39461) Nicholas Roumel (P37056) Lawrence A. Fields (P66084) 805 East Main Pinckney, MI 48169 (734) 954-0100 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: September 14, 2004

/s William G. Tishkoff By: William G. Tishkoff (P45165) A. Poppy Goudsmit (P61944) 407 North Main Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

5

JURY DEMAND

NOW COME the Plaintiffs, through counsel, and hereby demand trial by jury in the above

captioned matter.

Respectfully submitted,

FETT, ROUMEL & FIELDS, P.C.

TISHKOFF & GOUDSMIT PLLC

/s James K. Fett By: James K. Fett (P39461) Nicholas Roumel (P37056) Lawrence A. Fields (P66084) 805 East Main Pinckney, MI 48169 (734) 954-0100 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Dated: September 14, 2004

/s William G. Tishkoff By: William G. Tishkoff (P45165) A. Poppy Goudsmit (P61944) 407 North Main Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077 Attorneys for Plaintiffs

6

 
 Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 1 of 18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIRNA E. SERRANO, STEFANIE L. MCVAY, AND LINDA D. ALLEN,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs
vs.
CINTAS CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation,
Defendant.

File No. 04-cv-40132 Hon. Paul V. Gadola Demand For Jury Trial Class Action

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND Plaintiffs, through counsel, state the following complaint against Defendant:
NATURE OF CLAIM 1. This is a gender discrimination class action to redress defendant’s violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., as amended, (hereafter “Title VII”) by engaging in a nationwide policy, pattern or practice of denying “Service Sales Representative” positions to female applicants. Plaintiffs seek declaratory relief, as well as all relief available under Title VII and under § 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a. 2. This case concerns defendant Cintas’ hiring in thousands of “Service Sales Representative” or “SSR” positions nationwide from 1999 to the present. The employees in SSR positions service 25 to 30 customers a day by gathering information on customers’ orders; gathering the uniforms, mats and other materials needed to fill orders from a Cintas location; loading the uniforms and other materials in their trucks and driving them to the customer’s

449937.1

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 2 of 18
location; gathering and bagging soiled uniforms and other materials from employee lockers or other customer areas; replacing the soiled uniforms and other materials with cleaned materials; interacting with customers and obtaining renewals of service contracts or new contracts; and driving soiled uniforms and other materials back to their Cintas location.
3. Plaintiffs raise (a) claims of intentional discrimination under § 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–2(a), and (b) claims of disparate-impact discrimination under §§ 703(a) and 703(k) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–2(a) and 2000e–2(k), and the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 29 C.F.R. §§ 1607.1 et seq.
JURISDICTION, VENUE, AND PARTIES 4. The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331, 1343(a)(3), 1343(a)(4), 2201 and 2202 and § 706 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5. 5. Plaintiff Mirna Serrano is an adult woman residing in Canton, Michigan. She applied for employment with defendant in an SSR position on or about June 2, 1999, November 6, 1999, and January 5, 2000. She applied at the Westland and Madison Heights locations. She was qualified for these positions, but was not hired. 6. Plaintiff Linda D. Allen is an adult woman residing in Ferndale, Michigan. She applied at defendant’s Madison Heights, Michigan, location, for employment in an SSR position on or about February 20, 2001. She was qualified for this position, but was not hired. 7. Plaintiff Stefanie McVay is an adult woman residing in Romulus, Michigan. She applied at defendant’s Westland, Michigan, location, for employment in an SSR position on or about August 18, 2000. She was qualified for this position, but was not hired. 8. Venue within this District is proper. Plaintiffs reside within the Eastern District of Michigan, applied for employment at locations within the Eastern District of Michigan, and would have worked within the Eastern District of Michigan if they had been hired.
- 2 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 3 of 18
9. Defendant is an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce, within the meaning of Title VII. Its corporate web site, www.cintas.com, states: “Cintas designs, manufactures, and implements corporate identity uniform programs, provides entrance mats, restroom supplies, promotional products, and first aid and safety products for over 500,000 businesses”; that it provides uniforms and other products “for over 500,000 businesses,” and that it “operates 351 facilities in the U.S. and Canada . . . that employ more than 28,000 people.” It reported fiscal 2004 sales of $2.81 billion, with a net income of $272.2 million. It is headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio. At all relevant times, it has had more than 500 employees. It operates at least 17 facilities in the State of Michigan.
ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS 10. On or about April 7, 2000, plaintiff Serrano filed a charge with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission or “EEOC” alleging that defendant discriminated against her on the basis of her sex, in refusing to hire her for the SSR position. Her charge stated that she had applied at two locations, and continued: “There are no female Drivers at either of their locations.” She was not represented by counsel at the time she filed her charge, and relied on the EEOC to fill out the charge form properly. The EEOC quickly commenced a class investigation of sex discrimination in hiring for the SSR position, sought nationwide information, and placed defendant on notice of a possible nationwide class. While defendant ultimately succeeded in limiting the EEOC investigation to Michigan locations, defendant never provided any information to the EEOC suggesting that its practices at these locations were in any way atypical of its nationwide practices. 11. On July 3, 2002, the EEOC issued its Determination, stating in pertinent part:
Evidence gathered during the course of the investigation reveals that there is reasonable cause to believe that the Charging Party’s allegations are true. Furthermore, like and related and
- 3 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 4 of 18
growing out of this investigation, there is reasonable cause to believe that the Respondent has discriminated against females as a class by failing to hire them as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. The Determination did not state that it was limited to Michigan facilities. 12. At the time of its Determination, the EEOC listed over a hundred female applicants for SSR positions that it found entitled to relief at just two of defendant’s Michigan facilities. The EEOC unsuccessfully sought to conciliate with defendant on a classwide basis within the State of Michigan, and unsuccessfully sought relief for all female applicants for SSR positions adversely affected by defendant’s practices within the State of Michigan. 13. The original Complaint in this action was filed on May 10, 2004. The EEOC issued a Notice of Right to Sue to plaintiff Serrano on May 26, 2004, and she received it in due course.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 14. Defendant did not hire the named plaintiffs and other female applicants for SSR positions nationwide from June 12, 1999, through the present, because of their sex. 15. Defendant has followed a nationwide practice of delegating broad subjective discretion to its managers at its locations nationwide, allowing them to determine the standards they will or will not follow in hiring applicants for SSR positions. The qualifications defendant posts on its web site are predominantly subjective, with only minimal objective requirements prior to an offer of employment. The only other factors are either subjective or stated as a “plus” rather than a requirement. The listed qualifications are:
• Previous customer service experience, preferably in an industrial or service industry, a plus
• Previous experience working in a sales-related role, a plus
- 4 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 5 of 18
• Excellent interpersonal skills • The ability to multi-task and set/achieve goals • Strong motivation to succeed • A strong work-ethic • Attention to detail • Ability to accurately follow instructions • A positive, team-player attitude • The ability to stand for an extended amount of time over the course of the
day • The ability to handle physical requirements, including but not limited to,
repeated bending, stretching, twisting, and lifting up to a minimum of 40 lbs. • A valid driver’s license and a safe driving record (please note that candidates who receive an offer of employment will be subject to a MVR check) • A high school diploma, a plus The qualifications listed appear to be virtually identical for SSR positions nationwide. Defendant’s system is to give virtually untrammeled discretion to location managers and officials. 16. The SSR position is a non-traditional job for women. The managers and officials at its locations who are involved in hiring and exercising this broad, subjective discretion are predominantly male. Under the design of this system, gender stereotyping was foreseeable and did in fact occur. Defendant knew or should have known that its managers were using their authority to discriminate against female applicants because of their sex, and has failed or refused to take effective action to stop its local managers from discriminating on the basis of sex in filling SSR positions. It is therefore liable for its managers’ intentional discrimination against
- 5 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 6 of 18
female applicants for SSR positions. 17. Defendant’s managers at locations hired, and continue to hire, male applicants for
SSR positions with qualifications equal to, or worse than, the qualifications of female applicants whom they did not hire for such positions.
18. Defendant’s managers at locations failed to hire, and continue to fail to hire, female applicants with qualifications for SSR positions equal to, or better than, the qualifications of male applicants whom they hired for such positions.
19. Defendant’s officials at its locations employing SSRs have at all relevant times discriminated against female applicants because of their sex.
20. On or about April 20, 2005, defendant produced to plaintiffs computer-readable Applicant Flow Logs for Michigan locations. These logs showed that women were 15% of the sex-identified applicants for SSR positions in Michigan locations in 2004 and the first part of 2005.
21. On or about April 20, 2005, defendant transmitted to plaintiffs a computerreadable SSR Payroll data base containing information about paychecks issued to male and female SSRs between June 1, 1999, and September 20, 2002. The hires reflected in this data base almost all occurred prior to the July 3, 2002, EEOC Determination. On information and belief, defendant’s managers and officials at its various locations would likely have taken some time to learn of the EEOC Determination, and this would likely have occurred by September 20, 2002, but perhaps not long before that date. From June 5, 1999, through September 20, 2002, the data base shows that defendant hired 627 men, and only 33 women, as SSRs. Women were thus only 5% of the new SSR hires in Michigan during the period prior to the EEOC Determination and its immediate aftermath.
- 6 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 7 of 18
22. Using as the measure of the availability of women for defendant’s SSR positions the defendant’s figure that women were 15% of the sex-identified applicants for SSR positions in Michigan locations in 2004 and the first part of 2005, there was a shortfall of 66 female hires in Michigan alone in the period prior to the EEOC Determination and its immediate aftermath. The difference between the expected and actual hiring of women in this period was statistically significant at 7.2 standard deviations.
23. Defendant’s nationwide practices with respect to the hiring of women as SSRs produced the same results nationally as they did in Michigan. On April 26, 2005, defendant admitted in another case that fewer than 5% of its SSRs nationwide were female.
24. After the EEOC’s Determination that there was reasonable cause to believe defendant had discriminated against female applicants because of their sex, defendant more than doubled the proportion of its Michigan SSR hires who were female, although its hiring still fell short of women’s level of availability.
25. Defendant’s ability to increase the hiring of women sharply in a short period of time, without any intervening change in its hiring system, shows that defendant’s failure to hire qualified female applicants in the period from June 1, 1999 through September 20, 2002, was caused only by its own actions.
26. During the administrative investigation of plaintiff Serrano’s EEOC charge, defendant failed to provide the EEOC with any nondiscriminatory explanation of its failure to hire plaintiff Serrano, the other named plaintiffs, or any of the other women whose unsuccessful applications it provided to the EEOC, although defendant had a duty to produce such information if it existed, and it would have been strongly in the company’s interest to have provided such information. This failure allows the Court to infer that there is no legitimate nondiscriminatory
- 7 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 8 of 18
explanation for these refusals to hire women on the present record. 27. During the administrative investigation of plaintiff Serrano’s EEOC charge,
defendant failed to provide the EEOC with any nondiscriminatory explanation of the sexual disparities in its hiring decisions, although it would have been strongly in the company’s interest to do so if any such nondiscriminatory explanation existed. This failure allows the Court to infer that there is no legitimate nondiscriminatory explanation for these disparities on the present record.
28. During the administrative investigation of plaintiff Serrano’s EEOC charge, defendant failed to provide the EEOC with any information showing that defendant’s delegation of such broad and uncontrolled subjective discretion to local managers in hiring for SSR positions is job related for the position in question and consistent with business necessity under the standards of § 703(k) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(k), and the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 29 C.F.R. Part 1607.1 et seq., although defendant had a duty to provide such information in light of the adverse impact of this practice on female applicants for the SSR position. This failure allows the Court to infer that defendant’s delegation of broad and uncontrolled subjective discretion to local managers in hiring for SSR positions is neither job related for the position in question nor consistent with business necessity on the present record.
29. Defendant has failed to validate its delegation of such broad authority to local managers under the standards of the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures, 29 C.F.R. Part 1607.1 et seq. It is therefore liable for the disparate impact this practice has caused against female applicants for SSR positions.
30. Defendant is also liable for the disparate treatment discrimination caused by the challenged policy, pattern or practice against female applicants for SSR positions.
- 8 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 9 of 18
CLASS ALLEGATIONS 31. Plaintiffs sue on their own behalf and on behalf of a nationwide class of female applicants for SSR positions who sought such employment on or after June 12, 1999, 300 days before the filing of the EEOC charge herein. 32. The class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable. Defendant has produced in discovery the application forms of hundreds of women who applied unsuccessfully for SSR positions between June 1999 and May 2001 in Michigan alone. 33. There are questions of law and of fact common to the class, including but not limited to the following: Questions Common to the Disparate-Treatment and Disparate-Impact Claims
a. Did defendant follow a nationwide practice of delegating to its location managers broad subjective discretion in choosing the standards they would or would not use in hiring applicants for SSR positions and in making hiring decisions?
b. Did defendant follow a nationwide practice of failing to prevent its local managers from using their broad subjective discretion to discriminate against female applicants for SSR positions because of their sex?
c. Did defendant’s managers at locations hire male applicants for SSR positions with qualifications equal to, or worse than, the qualifications of female applicants whom they did not hire for such positions?
d. Did defendant’s managers at locations fail to hire female applicants with qualifications for SSR positions equal to, or better than, the qualifications of male applicants whom they hired for such positions?
- 9 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 10 of 18
e. May defendant rely on the letters it sent class members in 2004, inviting them to re-apply but not offering any positions or stating that any different practices would be followed in handling their applications, to limit any of the relief that may be awarded in this case?
Questions as to the Disparate-Treatment Claim f. Did defendant thus allow its local managers to discriminate against female applicants for SSR positions because of their sex? g. Did defendant know, or should it have known, that its local managers were discriminating against female applicants in hiring for SSR positions? h. Are nominal compensatory damages for emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, mental anguish, loss of enjoyment of life, and other nonpecuniary losses an appropriate remedy for female applicants who were not hired in SSR positions because of defendant’s unlawful discrimination? i. Is defendant liable for classwide punitive damages for its unlawful discrimination against female applicants for SSR positions?
Questions as to the Disparate-Impact Claim j. Did defendant’s delegation to its location managers of uncontrolled broad subjective discretion in hiring applicants for SSR positions result in adverse impact against female applicants for these positions? k. Did defendant validate its hiring practices for SSR positions under the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures? l. Are there alternative hiring practices that would have reduced or eliminated the adverse impact against female applicants for SSR positions?
- 10 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 11 of 18
34. The claims of the plaintiffs are typical of the claims of the class. Plaintiffs make no claims on their own behalves that differ from the claims of the class. Proof of classwide discrimination would assist plaintiffs greatly in proving their own claims. To prevail on their own claims, plaintiffs rely on the same types of evidence and patterns needed to prevail on behalf of the class.
35. Plaintiffs will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. Their claims are identical to those of the class, and are limited to sex discrimination in hiring for the SSR position. They have no conflict with any members of the class. They have retained counsel who are experienced in litigating class actions and have achieved excellent results in the past.
36. Defendant has acted or refused to act on grounds generally applicable to the class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief and corresponding declaratory relief with respect to the class as a whole. Plaintiffs complain of a policy, pattern or practice that has adversely affected female applicants nationwide in the same way as they themselves have been adversely affected.
37. The questions of law and of fact common to the members of the class predominate over any questions affecting only individual members.
38. A class action is superior to other available methods for the fair and efficient adjudication of the controversy:
a. There is little interest among members of the class in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions. The EEOC sex discrimination charge filed by plaintiff Serrano, and the June 23, 2004, EEOC sex and national origin discrimination charge filed by plaintiff Avalos in Ramirez v. Cintas, Case No. C 04–00281 JSW (N.D. Calif.), are the only EEOC charges involving this issue. Plaintiff Avalos and the claim of sex and
- 11 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 12 of 18
national origin discrimination in hiring applicants for the SSR position were added to the Ramirez litigation in the Second Amended Complaint, filed by leave of the court on July 7, 2004.
b. At this time, no one else can file an EEOC charge that can reach back to June 12, 1999. If class certification were denied, the class would be deprived of the benefit of plaintiff Serrano’s early charge filing date, and the great majority of the class would be deprived of all relief.
c. This case and the Ramirez action in California are the only cases that challenge defendant’s sex discrimination in hiring for SSR positions.
d. It is desirable to concentrate the litigation of the claims in this forum because the sex discrimination administrative charge that gave rise to the instant case was submitted to the EEOC more than four years before the charge in the Ramirez litigation, permitting the class greater potential relief. Plaintiff Serrano’s EEOC charge in this case would allow more than fifty months of additional class relief, and would make it possible to provide relief to thousands of additional women.
e. A nationwide class action would be manageable. A hiring discrimination case in which there are no qualifications not possessed by the general population, and in which defendant made hiring decisions without much regard to plaintiffs’ and class members’ qualifications, presents relatively few individual factual issues. Nor does this hiring case present the possibility of individualistic awards of damages for humiliation and emotional distress. Plaintiffs seek only the traditional equitable relief of a systemic decree, back pay, front pay, prejudgment interest, hiring orders, and constructive seniority, nominal compensatory damages on the disparate treatment count, and an award of punitive damages that can be made on a classwide basis.
- 12 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 13 of 18
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: DISPARATE IMPACT 39. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1 through 37 above, with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 40. The practices alleged above have a disproportionately adverse impact on female applicants, and defendant has not shown that they are justified by business necessity. 41. These practices violate §§ 703(a) and (k) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–2(a) and (k), and continue to violate the statute. 42. Plaintiffs seek certification of the class on this count under Rule 23(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for declaratory relief and for the following equitable relief: (a) a systemic decree ending the discriminatory practices and establishing a reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring system to ensure that they not recur, (b) classwide back pay, front pay, prejudgment interest, hiring orders, and constructive seniority, and (c) their reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: DISPARATE TREATMENT 43. Plaintiffs incorporate paragraphs 1 through 37 above, with the same force and effect as if fully set forth herein. 44. These practices violate § 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e–2(a), and continue to violate the statute. 45. Plaintiffs seek certification of the class on this count under Rule 23(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for declaratory relief and the following equitable relief: (a) a systemic decree ending the discriminatory practices and establishing a reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring system to ensure that they not recur, (b) classwide back pay, front pay, prejudgment interest, hiring orders, and constructive seniority, and (c) their reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.
- 13 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 14 of 18
46. Plaintiffs seek certification of the class on this count under Rule 23(b)(3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the following relief under § 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a: (a) nominal compensatory damages, (b) punitive damages, and (c) their reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.
WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray that the Court award the following relief: 1. Certification of the class on both counts under Rule 23(b)(2), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for declaratory relief and for the following equitable relief: (a) a systemic decree ending the discriminatory practices and establishing a reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring system to ensure that they not recur, (b) classwide back pay, front pay, prejudgment interest, hiring orders, and constructive seniority, and (c) their reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses; 2. Certification of the class on the disparate treatment count under Rule 23(b)(3), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, for the following relief under § 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a: (a) nominal compensatory damages, (b) punitive damages, and (c) their reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses; 3. A declaration that defendant discriminated against the plaintiffs and class members because of their sex in hiring for the SSR position; 4. A systemic decree ending the discriminatory practices and establishing a reporting, recordkeeping, and monitoring system to ensure that they not recur; 5. Back pay, front pay, and prejudgment interest; 6. Orders that defendant hire the named plaintiffs and class members, with seniority back to the dates, determined by a classwide mechanism, on which they would have been hired in the absence of discrimination;
- 14 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 15 of 18
7. Nominal compensatory damages for non-economic injury, in the amount of a dollar per plaintiff and class member;
8. Punitive damages to be determined on a classwide basis; and 9. Reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses.
TISHKOFF & ASSOCIATES PLLC
/s/ William G. Tishkoff By: William G. Tishkoff (P45165) 407 North Main Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077 FETT & FIELDS, P.C.
/s/ James K. Fett By: James K. Fett (P39461) Lawrence A. Fields (P66084) 805 East Main Pinckney, MI 48169 (734) 954-0100 LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD T. SEYMOUR, P.L.L.C.
By: /s/ Richard T. Seymour By: Richard T. Seymour (D.C. Bar 28100) 1150 Connecticut Avenue N.W. Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20036-4129
Telephone: (202) 862-4320 Facsimile (800) 805-1065
- 15 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 16 of 18

Dated: September 12, 2005.

LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
Bill Lann Lee (Calif. Bar 108452) Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000 Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
By: /s/ Rachel Geman
By: /s/ Gena E. Wiltsek
Rachel Geman (NY Bar RG0998) Gena E. Wiltsek (NY Bar GW6653) 780 Third Avenue, 48th Floor New York, New York 10017-2024
Telephone: (212) 355-9500 Facsimile: (212) 355-9592
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

- 16 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 17 of 18 JURY DEMAND
NOW COME the Plaintiffs, through counsel, and hereby demand trial by jury on the disparate-treatment claims in the above-captioned matter.
Respectfully submitted, /s/ William G. Tishkoff By: William G. Tishkoff (P45165) 407 North Main Street Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077 One of the Attorneys for Plaintiffs
- 17 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 70 Filed 09/12/2005 Page 18 of 18
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on this 12th day of September, 2005, I electronically filed the foregoing Second Amended Complaint with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following, who are counsel of record for defendant:
Gregory M. Utter, Esq. KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP 1400 Provident Tower One East Fourth Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 Theodore R. Opperwall, Esq. KIENBAUM OPPERWALL HARDY & PELTON, PLC 325 South Old Woodward Avenue Birmingham, MI 48009
__________________________________________ Richard T. Seymour (D.C. Bar No. 28100) Attorney for Plaintiffs
- 18 -

 
 Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 144 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIRNA E. SERRANO, et al., Plaintiffs,
v. CINTAS CORPORATION,
Defendant. _______________________________________/

CIVIL CASE NO. 04-40132
HONORABLE PAUL V. GADOLA U.S. DISTRICT COURT

ORDER The above-captioned case was recently consolidated with Civil Case No. 06-12311, Avalos, et al. v. Cintas Corp. During the process of consolidating the cases, it came to the attention of this Court that several inaccuracies had developed on the electronic docketing system due to the way various pleadings had been entered on the docket. This order corrects these docketing inaccuracies. In the above-captioned case, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) is currently listed on the electronic docketing system as a movant and as a third-party plaintiff. In the companion case of Avalos, et al. v. Cintas Corp., the EEOC is correctly listed as an intervening plaintiff. Since the EEOC’s proper position in the current suit is as an intervening plaintiff (also known as “plaintiff-intervenor”), it will be listed as such in the above-captioned case and its positions as movant and as third-party plaintiff will be removed from the docket. Similarly, Cintas Corporation is incorrectly listed as a third-party defendant, and its position as such will be removed from the docket. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the inaccuracies to the electronic

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 144 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 2 of 2

docketing system in the instant case, Civil Case No. 04-40132, are corrected in a manner as specified in this order.
SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 10, 2006

s/Paul V. Gadola HONORABLE PAUL V. GADOLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Certificate of Service

I hereby certify that on July 10, 2006 , I electronically filed the foregoing paper with

the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to

the following:

Kenneth L. Bird; Jennifer L. Brant; Michelle Eisele; Jo Ann Farnsworth; James K. Fett;

Lawrence A. Fields; Rachel J. Geman; A. Poppy Goudsmit; Sierra R. Koch; Theodore R.

Opperwall; Richard Talbot Seymour; Paul Strauss; William G. Tishkoff; Gregory M. Utter;

Omar Weaver; Gena E. Wiltsek; Laurie Young

, and I hereby

certify that I have mailed by United States Postal Service the paper to the following non-

ECF participants:

.

s/Ruth A. Brissaud Ruth A. Brissaud, Case Manager (810) 341-7845

2

 
 Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 1 of 15

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIRNA E. SERRANO, et al.,

Case No. 04-CV-40132

Plaintiffs,
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Honorable Judge Paul V. Gadola Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v.

CINTAS CORP., an Ohio Corporation,

Defendant.

Consolidated for pre-trial proceedings with:

BLANCA NELLY AVALOS, et al.,

Case No. 06-CV-12311

Plaintiffs,
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Honorable Paul V. Gadola Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

v.

CINTAS CORPORATION,

Defendant.

AVALOS PLAINTIFFS’ FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Edward Fitch, Bennita Shiffer, Osbaldo Mundo, and Aundre Graham for themselves

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 2 of 15
and all other persons similarly situated, complain of defendant Cintas Corporation (“Cintas” or the “company”) as follows.
NATURE OF THE CASE 1. This is an employment discrimination case, brought pursuant to the provisions of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. §1981, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (“§1981”); and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§2000e, et seq., as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991 (“Title VII”). Plaintiffs allege that defendant Cintas has engaged in a company-wide pattern and practice of employment discrimination, both intentional and systemic, on the basis of race, national origin, and sex, against themselves and a class of similarly-situated African-Americans, Hispanics, and females who were discriminated against in recruitment and hiring as service sales representatives (“SSRs”). Plaintiffs seek declaratory, injunctive, and equitable monetary relief from these practices, as well as relief available under §1981 and Title VII. 2. Transfer and consolidation. This lawsuit was originally filed in the Northern District of California, captioned Ramirez et al., v. Cintas Corporation, Case No. C04-281-JSW. Plaintiffs alleged that Cintas had engaged in, and was continuing to engage in a company-wide pattern and practice of employment discrimination on the bases of race, national origin, and gender in its hiring, recruitment, promotions, transfers, job assignments, and compensation. The EEOC filed a complaint in intervention on behalf of women who were denied hire and recruitment for SSR positions because of gender. As of August 30, 2005, the four Ramirez plaintiffs who alleged discrimination in recruitment and hiring for the SSR position were: (a) Robert Harris (African-American male); (b) Luis Pocasangre Cardoza (a Hispanic male); (c) Blanca Nelly Avalos (Hispanic female); (d) Anthony Jones (African-American male).
2

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 3 of 15
Following 2006, when Pocasangre Cardoza and Harris withdrew from the lawsuit and their claims were dismissed, Jones and Avalos continued as named plaintiffs with respect to the recruitment and hiring claims.
3. At the same time, a second class action was pending in the Eastern District of Michigan (Serrano et al., and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Cintas Corporation, Case No. 04-CV-40132) alleging gender discrimination in the hiring of SSRs at Cintas. In May 2006, Avalos’ and Jones’ hiring and recruitment claims were transferred to the Eastern District of Michigan captioned under the title Avalos v. Cintas, Case No. 06-CV-12311 and consolidated with Serrano, for pretrial purposes.
4. All administrative prerequisites to these claims have been exhausted by: EEOC charges filed by Pocasangre Cardoza and Harris on September 26, 2003 and November 13, 2003 alleging that Cintas was systematically discriminating against minorities in hiring for SSR; Avalos’ EEOC charge filed on June 17, 2004 alleging that Cintas was systematically discriminating against Hispanics and women in hiring for SSR; and Jones’ charge filed on May 6, 2005 alleging that Cintas was systematically discriminating against African Americans in hiring for SSR; and necessary right to sue notices were issued.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE 5. Jurisdiction. This Court has jurisdiction of plaintiffs’ §1981 claims pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§1331, 1343(a)(4), 2201, and 2202. The Court has original jurisdiction of plaintiffs’ Title VII claims pursuant to those four provisions as well as §706 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §2000e-5(f)(3). 6. Venue. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391(c) and 42 U.S.C. §2000e-5(f)(3). Cintas has also waived any venue arguments it might otherwise have to
3

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 4 of 15
the Eastern District of Michigan’s taking venue under such doctrines as the pendent venue doctrine.
PARTIES 7. Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos is a Hispanic female and a resident of Panorama City, California. She applied for an SSR job in January 2004 at Cintas’ Van Nuys, California facility and was denied hire despite her qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time her application was pending. 8. Plaintiff Anthony Jones is an African-American male and a resident of Camden, Delaware. He applied for an SSR job in November 2004 at Cintas’ Dover, Delaware facility and was denied hire despite his qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time his application was pending. 9. Plaintiff Dimitri Mack is an African-American and a resident of Milwaukee, Wisconsin. He applied for an SSR job in December 2003 at Cintas’ Franklin, Wisconsin facility and was denied hire despite his qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time his application was pending. 10. Plaintiff Sharon Wilborn is an African-American female and a resident of Canton, Michigan. She applied for an SSR job at Cintas’ Macomb, Michigan facility in February 2003 and was denied hire despite her qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time her application was pending. 11. Plaintiff Jose Picorelli is an Hispanic male and a resident of Clermont, Florida. He applied for an SSR job at Cintas’ Franklin, Wisconsin facility in November 2002 and was denied hire despite his qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time his application was pending.
4

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 5 of 15
12. Plaintiff Edward Fitch is an African-American male and a resident of Greenville, South Carolina. He applied for an SSR job at Cintas’ Greenville, South Carolina facility in March 2002 and was denied hire despite his qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time his application was pending.
13. Plaintiff Bennita Shiffer is an African-American female and a resident of Simpsonville, South Carolina. She applied for an SSR job at Cintas’ Greenville, South Carolina facility in December 2002 and was denied hire despite her qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time her application was pending.
14. Plaintiff Osbaldo Mundo is an Hispanic male and a resident of Los Angeles, California. He applied for an SSR job at Cintas’ Pico Rivera, California facility in July 2002 and again in the late summer of 2003 and was denied hire despite his qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time his application was pending.
15. Plaintiff Aundre Graham is an African American male and a resident of Toledo, Ohio. He applied for an SSR job at Cintas’ Perrysburg, Ohio facility in September 2004 and was denied hire despite his qualifications for the position and the fact that there were vacancies at the time his application was pending.
16. Defendant Cintas is a national corporation headquartered in Mason, Ohio, near Cincinnati. Its major business involves renting uniforms, mats, and towels to commercial enterprises. It has more than 34,000 employees and operates more than 400 operations facilities across the country, most of which are in the Rental Division. For fiscal year 2007, Cintas reported more than $3.7 billion in sales and over $335 million in profits.
5

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 6 of 15
FACTS RELATING TO THE PATTERN OF INTENTIONAL AND SYSTEMIC DISCRIMINATION BY DEFENDANT CINTAS 17. Defendant Cintas’ recruitment and hiring practices and systems discriminate against African-Americans, Hispanics and females, because of their race, national origin and/or sex, who seek employment as SSRs in rental division facilities. The discriminatory practices engaged in by Cintas are intentional and systemic in nature and adversely affect plaintiffs and members of the class with respect to opportunities for hiring as SSRs in its rental division, as specifically summarized below. 18. Upon information and belief, Cintas’ upper-level management is comprised almost exclusively of white men. The homogenous racial and gender composition of Cintas’ management at the highest levels is reflected in management throughout the facilities in the rental division, which also is predominantly white and male. 19. Cintas has developed and continually reinforces a centralized corporate culture that is implemented at each of its rental division facilities throughout the country. Cintas regularly moves upper-level managers from one rental division facility to another, and often from one state to another. This practice is done, in part, to ensure that a uniform Cintas culture operates consistently throughout all of its rental facilities. 20. SSRs work in the service department at Rental Division facilities. They deliver clean uniforms, mats, and towels to clients and pick up dirty items, which they return to the facility for laundering. SSRs are the key contacts for developing good relationships with Cintas’ customers. A critical part of their job duties entails selling additional products and services to existing Cintas customers. SSRs are the highest paid non-supervisory workers in the Rental Division.
6

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 7 of 15
21. Cintas does not use objective standards or criteria for making hiring decisions for SSR positions. Instead, Cintas confers discretion on the facility managers who hire SSRS to make SSR hiring decisions based on subjective preferences, frequently based heavily on referrals by incumbent SSRs. These practices have had a disparate impact on African-Americans, Hispanics, and women who have applied for SSR positions.
22. As a result of these practices, African-Americans, Hispanics, and women have been discriminated against in recruitment and hiring for SSR positions in the rental division; and African-Americans, Hispanics, and women are underrepresented in the SSR position. For example, at no point from 1999 through 2003 (i.e., when the plaintiffs’ first EEOC charges were filed) did the total percentage of female SSRs exceed five percent at Cintas. The Cintas SSR workforce was 5.5% female in 2004, and 9% and 9.6% female in 2005 and 2006, respectively. The pattern for African American and Hispanic hiring is similar, with increases in the years following the filing of the lawsuit.
23. Plaintiffs Avalos, Jones, Mack, Wilborn, Picorelli, Fitch, Shiffer, Graham and Munoz, and hundreds of other qualified Hispanics, females, and African American applicants like them, were denied SSR jobs despite their qualifications because of their national origin, gender, and race.
CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS 24. Plaintiffs bring their claims under §1981 for race and national origin discrimination, and under Title VII for race, national origin, and gender discrimination, and as a class action pursuant to Rule 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, as more specifically described below. 25. Plaintiffs seek to represent the class consisting of:
7

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 8 of 15
(a) women who were denied SSR positions in Cintas' rental division during the limitations period;
(b) African-Americans who were denied SSR positions in Cintas' rental division during the limitations period; and
(c) Hispanics who were denied SSR positions in Cintas' rental division during the limitations period.
26. The named plaintiffs as class representatives, and the class as defined above, meet each of the requirements of Rule 23(a) and 23(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for certification of this case as a class action, for the reasons stated below.
27. Rule 23(a)(1) -- numerosity. It is estimated that there are thousands of AfricanAmericans, thousands of Hispanics, and thousands of women, who have applied unsuccessfully for SSR positions during the limitations period. They are located throughout the nation in hundreds of communities near or around Cintas’ more than 200 rental facilities. The class is therefore so numerous as to make individual joinder of class members is impracticable.
28. Rule 23(a)(2) -- commonality. There are numerous common questions of fact and law in this action that relate to and affect the claims of relief sought by the class, as well as the anticipated defenses thereto. These common questions include, without limitation, the following:
(a) whether women, African-Americans, and Hispanics were denied SSR positions in Cintas’ rental division during the limitations period because of their gender, race, or national origin;
(b) whether, over the period covered by this lawsuit, Cintas’ delegation to local level managers of unsupervised discretion in the
8

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 9 of 15
hiring of SSRs has provided a ready means for discrimination; and whether this decisionmaking authority has been used to discriminate against African-Americans, Hispanics, and women; (c) whether there is a pattern throughout Cintas’ rental division of discrimination in hiring for the SSR position against AfricanAmericans and Hispanics, and women; (d) whether plaintiffs’ statistical analyses show that Cintas’ recruitment and hiring practices had an adverse impact on AfricanAmericans, Hispanics, and women, and, if so, whether they were neither job related nor consistent with business necessity; (e) what relief is appropriate to remedy the claims of plaintiffs and the class resulting from Cintas’ above-described discriminatory employment practices pursuant to Title VII; (f) what are the appropriate standards for a grant of equitable relief, both injunctive and in the form of damages that inure to the group benefit, to remedy Cintas’ above-described discriminatory employment practices; (g) whether Cintas’ above-described discriminatory actions are “intentional” within the meaning of authorities applying §1981 and 42 U.S.C. §1981a(a)(1); and (h) whether Cintas acted with malice or reckless indifference by the above-described discrimination against plaintiffs and the class in the face of a perceived risk that its actions would violate their
9

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 10 of 15
rights such that an award of punitive damages that inure to the group benefit of the class is appropriate; and, if so, how such award should be determined and distributed to members of the class. 29. Rule 23(a)(3) -- typicality. The claims of the named plaintiffs, who are representatives of the class, are typical of the claims of the class. The named plaintiffs have been personally affected and discriminated against by the same practices that plaintiffs allege in this complaint have harmed the class as a whole and other class members individually. 30. Rule 23(a)(4) -- adequacy. The named plaintiffs will fairly and adequately represent the interests of the class. There is no conflict between any named plaintiff and other members of the class with respect to this action or the claims for relief set forth in this complaint. The attorneys for the plaintiffs are experienced and competent in representation of classes in employment discrimination actions, and they have and will devote adequate staff and other resources to the case. 31. Rule 23(b)(2) -- case maintainable under this rule. This action is properly maintained as a class action pursuant to subsection (b)(2) of Rule 23 in that defendant Cintas has acted or refused to act on grounds which are generally applicable to the class, in particular race, national origin, and/or sex, thereby making appropriate injunctive relief and corresponding back pay and punitive damages that inure to the group benefit. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION -- VIOLATION OF TITLE VII (ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFFS AND MEMBERS OF THE CLASS) 32. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege, and incorporate by reference herein the allegations of ¶¶1-32, inclusive, as though fully set forth herein.
10

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 11 of 15
33. Defendant’s discrimination against plaintiffs and members of the classes they represent, as alleged herein, is in violation of the rights secured to them by Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§2000e, et seq., as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
34. By the conduct described above, defendant intentionally violated the Title VII race, national origin, and gender rights of plaintiffs and members of the classes they represent.
35. Defendant’s conduct also has had an adverse impact against plaintiffs and members of the classes they represent, and is neither job related nor consistent with business necessity, and therefore violates their rights under Title VII.
36. In its discriminatory actions as alleged above, Cintas has acted with malice or reckless indifference to the Title VII rights of the above-named African-American, Hispanic, and female plaintiffs and class members they represent, thereby entitling them to an award of punitive damages that inure to the benefit of the class.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION -- VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. §1981 (ON BEHALF OF AFRICAN-AMERICAN AND HISPANIC PLAINTIFFS AND MEMBERS OF THE CLASS)
37. Plaintiffs repeat, reallege, and incorporate by this reference the allegations set forth in ¶¶1-37, inclusive, as though fully set forth herein.
38. Defendant Cintas’ discrimination against plaintiffs and members of the classes they represent is in violation of the rights of the plaintiffs and the class afforded them by the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. §1981, as amended by the Civil Rights Act of 1991.
39. By the conduct described above, defendant intentionally violated the §1981 race, national origin, and gender rights of plaintiffs and members of the classes they represent.
40. In its discriminatory actions as alleged above, Cintas has acted with malice or reckless indifference to the rights of the Hispanic and African-American plaintiffs and class
11

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 12 of 15
members, thereby entitling them to an award of punitive damages that inure to the benefit of the class.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, plaintiffs pray that the Court grant relief on their first and second causes of action as specified below. (1) Plaintiffs pray that the Court certify a class under Rule 23(b)(2) defined
as: (a) women who were denied hiring to SSR positions in Cintas’
rental division during the limitations period; (b) African-Americans who were denied hiring to SSR
positions in Cintas’ rental division during the limitations period; and (c) Hispanics who were denied hiring to SSR positions in Cintas’ rental division during the limitations period; (2) plaintiffs pray that the Court issue a declaratory judgment against defendant Cintas finding that Cintas’ rental division has violated the rights of plaintiffs and the class under §1981 and Title VII, by denying and depriving them of equal employment opportunities on the basis of race, national origin, and/or sex, as alleged in this complaint; (3) plaintiffs pray that the Court issue a preliminary and permanent injunction pursuant to §1981 and Title VII, enjoining defendant Cintas, its officers, agents, employees, and all others acting for or succeeding Cintas, from engaging in the discriminatory employment practices alleged in this
12

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 13 of 15
complaint that discriminate against plaintiffs or the class on the basis of race, national origin, and/or sex in violation of §1981 and/or Title VII; (4) plaintiffs pray that the Court enter a preliminary and permanent injunction ordering and requiring that defendant Cintas formulate, institute, adopt, and maintain policies and practices which will provide equal employment opportunities to plaintiffs, the class, and future African-American, Hispanic, and female applicants for employment to SSR positions, and which will to the extent practicable remedy the continuing effects of past discrimination against plaintiffs and the class, and restore them to the employment status and position they would have held and enjoyed but for the unlawful discrimination complained of herein; (5) plaintiffs pray that the Court order defendant to pay equitable monetary relief and punitive damages that inure to the group benefit to plaintiffs and members of the class on whose behalf claims are asserted under §1981 and Title VII, in an amount to be proved at trial; (6) plaintiffs pray that the Court award them their costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees, payable by defendant Cintas by determining that plaintiffs are prevailing parties, and thereupon awarding plaintiffs their reasonable costs, expenses, and attorneys’ fees incurred in bringing this action, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1988 on the first cause of action, and §1988 and 42 U.S.C. §2000e-5(k) on the second cause of action;
13

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 14 of 15
(7) plaintiffs pray that the Court order Cintas to pay pre- and post-judgment interest on all monetary amounts awarded in this action, as provided by law;
(8) plaintiffs pray that the Court retain jurisdiction of this case for a sufficient period of time to ensure that defendant Cintas has fully complied with the preliminary and permanent injunctions requested herein and has remedied to the greatest extent practicable the discriminatory policies and practices complained of herein, and that Cintas is operating in full compliance with the requirements of §1981 and Title VII with regard to its employment policies and practices; and
(9) plaintiffs pray that the Court award such other and further relief as this Court deems equitable and just. DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
On behalf of themselves and the class alleged herein, plaintiffs demand trial by jury on all claims stated in this complaint on which they are entitled to a jury trial.
Dated this 17th day of January, 2008. Respectfully submitted,
s/ Sarah E. Siskind Sarah E. Siskind (WI SB #1004902) ssiskind@lawmbg.com Miner, Barnhill & Galland, PC 44 E. Mifflin St., Suite 803 Madison, WI 53703 (608) 255-5200 (telephone) (608) 255-5380 (facsimile)
14

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 332 Filed 03/03/2008 Page 15 of 15
Judson H. Miner (IL SB #1925237) jminer@lawmbg.com Scott A. Entin (IL SB #6281347) sentin@lawmbg.com Miner, Barnhill & Galland, PC 14 West Erie Street Chicago, IL 60610 (312) 751-1170 (telephone) (312) 751-0438 (facsimile) Morris J. Baller (CA SB #048928) mballer@gdblegal.com Roberta L. Steele (CA SB #188198) rsteele@gdblegal.com Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612-3534 (510) 763-9800 (telephone) (510) 835-1417 (facsimile)
15

 
 Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 143 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIRNA E. SERRANO, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Case No. 04-CV-40132 Honorable Paul V. Gadola Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

vs.

CINTAS CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation,

Defendant.

Consolidated for Pre-Trial Proceedings with:

BLANCA NELLY AVALOS, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated,

Case No. 06-CV-12311

Plaintiffs

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

vs.

CINTAS CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation,

Defendant.

STIPULATED ORDER OF PRE-TRIAL CONSOLIDATION On June 6, 2006, the Court entered an Order reassigning Avalos, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 06-12311, a companion case to Serrano, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 0440132, to the docket of HONORABLE PAUL V. GADOLA and MAGISTRATE JUDGE

- 1 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 143 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 2 of 6

DONALD A. SCHEER pursuant to LR 83.11. The Court finds that the Serrano case and the Avalos case contain common questions of law and fact. Therefore, to avoid unnecessary costs and delay, the Court will consolidate the Serrano and Avalos cases for purposes of pre-trial proceedings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The member case of Avalos, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 06-12311, is CONSOLIDATED FOR PURPOSES OF PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER the lead case of Serrano, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 04-40132. All materials pertaining to the member case No. 06-12311 and the lead case No. 04-40132 shall henceforth be filed and docketed under the lead case No. 04-40132, with the consolidated case caption utilized in this Order. SO ORDERED.

Dated:

July 10, 2006

Entry of Order stipulated to: Dated: June 23, 2006

s/Paul V. Gadola HONORABLE PAUL V. GADOLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
s/William G. Tishkoff William G. Tishkoff (MI SB #P45165) will@tishkofflaw.com TISHKOFF & ASSOCIATES PLLC 407 North Main Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077 (telephone) (734) 665-1613 (facsimile)

- 2 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 143 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 3 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of James K. Fett James K. Fett (MI SB #P39461) jim@fettlaw.com FETT & FIELDS, P.C. 805 East Main Pinckney, Michigan 48169 (734) 954-0100 (telephone) (734) 954-0762 (facsimile)

Dated: June 23, 2006 Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Bill Lann Lee Bill Lann Lee (CA SB #108452) blee@lchb.com LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3339 (415) 956-1000 (telephone) (415) 956-1008 (facsimile)
s/ with consent of Rachel Geman Rachel Geman (NY SB #RG0998) rgeman@lchb.com Gena E. Wiltsek (NY SB #GW6653) gwiltsek@lchb.com LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP 780 Third Avenue, 48th Floor New York, New York 10017-2024 (212) 355-9500 (telephone) (212) 355-9592 (facsimile)

- 3 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 143 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 4 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Richard T. Seymour Richard T. Seymour (DC SB #28100) rick@RickSeymourLaw.net LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD T. SEYMOUR 1150 Connecticut Avenue N.W., Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036-4129 (202) 862-4320 (telephone) (800) 805-1065 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR SERRANO PLAINTIFFS

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Laurie A. Young Laurie A. Young (IN) laurie.young@eeoc.gov Michelle Eisele (IN) michelle.eisele@eeoc.gov Kenneth Bird (IN) kenneth.bird@eeoc.gov EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-4203 (317) 226-7202 (telephone) (317) 226-5571 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR SERRANO PLAINTIFFINTERVENOR

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Gregory M. Utter Gregory M. Utter (OH SB #0032528) gmutter@kmklaw.com KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP, PLL One East Fourth Street, Suite 1400 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 579-6540 (telephone) (513) 579-6457 (facsimile)

- 4 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 143 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 5 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006 Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Theodore R. Opperwall Theodore R. Opperwall (MI SB #P31374) topperwall@kohp.com KIENBAUM OPPERWALL HARDY & PELTON, PLC 280 North Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 400 Birmingham, Michigan 48009 (248) 645-0000 (telephone) (248) 645-1385 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR CINTAS
s/ with consent of Nancy L. Abell Nancy L. Abell (CA SB #88785) nancyabell@paulhastings.com Elena R. Baca (CA SB #160564) elenabaca@paulhastings.com Stephen P. Sonnenberg (CA SB #164881) stephensonnenberg@paulhastings.com Heather A. Morgan (CA SB #177425) heathermorgan@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street Twenty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 (213) 683-6000 (telephone) (213) 627-0705 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR CINTAS

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Paul Strauss Paul Strauss (CA SB #153937) pstrauss@lawmbg.com Sharon Legenza (IL SB #6207311) slegenza@lawmbg.com Scott A. Entin (IL SB #6281347) sentin@lawmbg.com MINER, BARNHILL & GALLAND 14 W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 60610 (312) 751-1170 (telephone)

- 5 -

Case 4:04-cv-40132-PVG-DAS Document 143 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 6 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006

Morris J. Baller (CA SB #048928) mjb@gdblegal.com Roberta L. Steele (CA SB #188198) rls@gdblegal.com Joseph E. Jaramillo (CA SB #178566) jej@gdblegal.com GOLDSTEIN, DEMCHAK, BALLER,
BORGEN & DARDARIAN 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 763-9800 (telephone) (510) 835-1417 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR RAMIREZ PLAINTIFFS

Dated: June 23, 2006

Robert D. Unitas (MA) robert.unitas@eeoc.gov Senior Trial Attorney SLS Erica D. White-Dunston (MD) erica.white-dunston@eeoc.gov Trial Attorney SLS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION 1801 L Street N.W. Washington, DC 20507 (202) 663-4768 (telephone) (202) 663-4196 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR RAMIREZ PLAINTIFFINTERVENOR

- 6 -

 
 Case 4:06-cv-12311-PVG-DAS Document 7 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 1 of 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIRNA E. SERRANO, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Case No. 04-CV-40132 Honorable Paul V. Gadola Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

vs.

CINTAS CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation,

Defendant.

Consolidated for Pre-Trial Proceedings with:

BLANCA NELLY AVALOS, et al., on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated,

Case No. 06-CV-12311

Plaintiffs

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,

Plaintiff-Intervenor,

vs.

CINTAS CORPORATION, an Ohio Corporation,

Defendant.

STIPULATED ORDER OF PRE-TRIAL CONSOLIDATION On June 6, 2006, the Court entered an Order reassigning Avalos, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 06-12311, a companion case to Serrano, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 0440132, to the docket of HONORABLE PAUL V. GADOLA and MAGISTRATE JUDGE

- 1 -

Case 4:06-cv-12311-PVG-DAS Document 7 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 2 of 6

DONALD A. SCHEER pursuant to LR 83.11. The Court finds that the Serrano case and the Avalos case contain common questions of law and fact. Therefore, to avoid unnecessary costs and delay, the Court will consolidate the Serrano and Avalos cases for purposes of pre-trial proceedings. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 42.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: The member case of Avalos, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 06-12311, is CONSOLIDATED FOR PURPOSES OF PRE-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS UNDER the lead case of Serrano, et al. v. Cintas Corporation, No. 04-40132. All materials pertaining to the member case No. 06-12311 and the lead case No. 04-40132 shall henceforth be filed and docketed under the lead case No. 04-40132, with the consolidated case caption utilized in this Order. SO ORDERED.

Dated:

July 10, 2006

Entry of Order stipulated to: Dated: June 23, 2006

s/Paul V. Gadola HONORABLE PAUL V. GADOLA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
s/William G. Tishkoff William G. Tishkoff (MI SB #P45165) will@tishkofflaw.com TISHKOFF & ASSOCIATES PLLC 407 North Main Street Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104-1158 (734) 663-4077 (telephone) (734) 665-1613 (facsimile)

- 2 -

Case 4:06-cv-12311-PVG-DAS Document 7 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 3 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of James K. Fett James K. Fett (MI SB #P39461) jim@fettlaw.com FETT & FIELDS, P.C. 805 East Main Pinckney, Michigan 48169 (734) 954-0100 (telephone) (734) 954-0762 (facsimile)

Dated: June 23, 2006 Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Bill Lann Lee Bill Lann Lee (CA SB #108452) blee@lchb.com LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP Embarcadero Center West 275 Battery Street, 30th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3339 (415) 956-1000 (telephone) (415) 956-1008 (facsimile)
s/ with consent of Rachel Geman Rachel Geman (NY SB #RG0998) rgeman@lchb.com Gena E. Wiltsek (NY SB #GW6653) gwiltsek@lchb.com LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN LLP 780 Third Avenue, 48th Floor New York, New York 10017-2024 (212) 355-9500 (telephone) (212) 355-9592 (facsimile)

- 3 -

Case 4:06-cv-12311-PVG-DAS Document 7 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 4 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Richard T. Seymour Richard T. Seymour (DC SB #28100) rick@RickSeymourLaw.net LAW OFFICE OF RICHARD T. SEYMOUR 1150 Connecticut Avenue N.W., Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036-4129 (202) 862-4320 (telephone) (800) 805-1065 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR SERRANO PLAINTIFFS

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Laurie A. Young Laurie A. Young (IN) laurie.young@eeoc.gov Michelle Eisele (IN) michelle.eisele@eeoc.gov Kenneth Bird (IN) kenneth.bird@eeoc.gov EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900 Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-4203 (317) 226-7202 (telephone) (317) 226-5571 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR SERRANO PLAINTIFFINTERVENOR

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Gregory M. Utter Gregory M. Utter (OH SB #0032528) gmutter@kmklaw.com KEATING MUETHING & KLEKAMP, PLL One East Fourth Street, Suite 1400 Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 579-6540 (telephone) (513) 579-6457 (facsimile)

- 4 -

Case 4:06-cv-12311-PVG-DAS Document 7 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 5 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006 Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Theodore R. Opperwall Theodore R. Opperwall (MI SB #P31374) topperwall@kohp.com KIENBAUM OPPERWALL HARDY & PELTON, PLC 280 North Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 400 Birmingham, Michigan 48009 (248) 645-0000 (telephone) (248) 645-1385 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR CINTAS
s/ with consent of Nancy L. Abell Nancy L. Abell (CA SB #88785) nancyabell@paulhastings.com Elena R. Baca (CA SB #160564) elenabaca@paulhastings.com Stephen P. Sonnenberg (CA SB #164881) stephensonnenberg@paulhastings.com Heather A. Morgan (CA SB #177425) heathermorgan@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street Twenty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-2228 (213) 683-6000 (telephone) (213) 627-0705 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR CINTAS

Dated: June 23, 2006

s/ with consent of Paul Strauss Paul Strauss (CA SB #153937) pstrauss@lawmbg.com Sharon Legenza (IL SB #6207311) slegenza@lawmbg.com Scott A. Entin (IL SB #6281347) sentin@lawmbg.com MINER, BARNHILL & GALLAND 14 W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 60610 (312) 751-1170 (telephone)

- 5 -

Case 4:06-cv-12311-PVG-DAS Document 7 Filed 07/10/2006 Page 6 of 6

Dated: June 23, 2006

Morris J. Baller (CA SB #048928) mjb@gdblegal.com Roberta L. Steele (CA SB #188198) rls@gdblegal.com Joseph E. Jaramillo (CA SB #178566) jej@gdblegal.com GOLDSTEIN, DEMCHAK, BALLER,
BORGEN & DARDARIAN 300 Lakeside Drive, Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 (510) 763-9800 (telephone) (510) 835-1417 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR RAMIREZ PLAINTIFFS

Dated: June 23, 2006

Robert D. Unitas (MA) robert.unitas@eeoc.gov Senior Trial Attorney SLS Erica D. White-Dunston (MD) erica.white-dunston@eeoc.gov Trial Attorney SLS EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY
COMMISSION 1801 L Street N.W. Washington, DC 20507 (202) 663-4768 (telephone) (202) 663-4196 (facsimile)
ATTORNEYS FOR RAMIREZ PLAINTIFFINTERVENOR

- 6 -

 
 Serrano v. Cintas Corp., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d (2006)
2006 WL 585714 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.
United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division.
Mirna E. SERRANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
CINTAS CORPORATION, Defendant.
No. Civ.A. 04-40132. | March 9, 2006.
Attorneys and Law Firms
Gena E. Wiltsek, Rachel J. Geman, Lieff, Cabraser, New York, NY, James K. Fett, Lawrence A. Fields, Fett & Fields, Pinckney, MI, Nicholas B. Roumel, William G. Tishkoff, Jennifer L. Brant, A. Poppy Goudsmit, Tishkoff & Assoc., Ann Arbor, MI, Richard Talbot Seymour, Richard T. Seymour Assoc., Washington, DC, for Plaintiffs.
Paul Strauss, Miner, Barnhill, Chicago, IL, for Colleen Grindle, Dawn Stevenson, Ruthie Richardson.
Gregory M. Utter, Keating, Muething, Cincinnati, OH, Theodore R. Opperwall, Kienbaum, Opperwall, Birmingham, MI, for Defendant.
Kenneth L. Bird, Laurie Young, Michelle Eisele, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Indianapolis, IN, Robert K. Dawkins, Omar Weaver, Detroit, MI, for Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Opinion
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’ MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS
SCHEER, Magistrate J.
*1 This is an Employment Discrimination case. Plaintiffs, Mirna E. Serrano (“Serrano”), Stefanie L. McVay (“McVay”) and Linda D. Allen (“Allen”) claim that they, and all similarly situated female applicants for Service Sale Representative (“SSR”) positions with Cintas Corporation were subjected to intentional discrimination and disparate impact discrimination by the corporation’s hiring policies. The named plaintiffs seek to pursue this action as representatives of the Class, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 23. A prerequisite to certification is a showing by plaintiffs that their claims are typical of the claims of the Class. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a).
Defendant, Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”) requested that the individual plaintiffs execute authorizations for the production of a broad range of employment related documents from their past and current employers. Plaintiffs declined to execute the authorizations. Defendant then issued a series of subpoenas directly to plaintiffs’ various past and present employers demanding, among other things, all personnel and pay records, correspondence, documented complaints and litigation pertaining to the individual plaintiffs and their employers. In response, plaintiffs filed a Motion to Quash the Subpoenas. Defendant filed its Memorandum in Opposition to the Motion, and the matter was brought on for hearing on February 27, 2006.
Plaintiff’s maintain that the subpoenas should be quashed because they raise the specter of retaliation against plaintiffs. They further argue that the subpoenas constitute harassment, and represent a “fishing expedition” for irrelevant information in derogation of the plaintiffs’ rights of privacy. Plaintiffs maintain that defendant is attempting to obtain irrelevant information by means of over broad and abusive requests, all for the purpose of establishing an “after acquired evidence defense.” They cite Gambale v. Deutsche Bank APG, 2003 WL 115221 (S.D.N.Y. Jan.10, 2003) for the proposition that other courts have refused to permit discovery efforts of the type under consideration because they constitute unnecessary annoyance and harassment which pose a threat of deleterious effects on plaintiffs’ current and future employment prospects. Among other
1

Serrano v. Cintas Corp., Not Reported in F.Supp.2d (2006) cases, plaintiffs also cite Perry v. Best Lock Corp., 1999 WL 33494858 (S.D.Ind. Jan.21, 1991) in which the court denied an employer’s use of broad discovery requests, despite its finding that such efforts “probably fall within the scope of permissible discovery pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1).” In response, defendant asserts that it is entitled to discover “after acquired evidence” and that courts can protect plaintiffs against overzealous discovery on a case by case basis as part of the judicial responsibility to oversee discovery. McKennon v. Nashville Banner Pub. Co., 513 U.S. 352, 363, 115 S.Ct. 879, 130 L.Ed.2d 852 (1995). Defendant further asserts that the information sought by its subpoenas is directly relevant to the question of whether the named plaintiffs’ claims are typical of the claims and defenses of the Class which they seek to represent. Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a) establishes that such typicality is a prerequisite to a Class Action. Defendant cites Bacon v. Honda of America Mfg., Inc., 370 F.3d 565 (6th Cir.2004) for the proposition that the typicality requirement is not met where the named plaintiffs cannot show that they were eligible for the positions sought. Cintas argues that it must be permitted to conduct discovery at the precertification stage of this case in support of its position that Serrano, McVay and Allen were not qualified to be Service Sales Representatives. *2 While I am concerned that the overzealous pursuit of discovery carries the potential for abuse and could subject the named plaintiffs to retaliation, I find that the issue of typicality is sufficiently important to warrant qualifications-related discovery at this stage of the case. The plaintiffs have produced no persuasive evidence of retaliation or other ill effects upon them as a result of the subpoenas at issue. Unless they can satisfy all of the prerequisites set out in Fed.R.Civ.P. 23(a), these plaintiffs should not be permitted to represent the Class. Ultimately, evidence tending to show their lack of qualification for SSR positions will be directly relevant to their individual claims for relief. I am persuaded that the potential benefit of discovery relating to their work histories outweighs any demonstrated burden at this point. The general policy of the Rules governing civil discovery, as enunciated in Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1) is that it should be broad. While the succeeding subsection of the Rule permits the court to impose limitations, I am not persuaded that they are necessary at this juncture. Accordingly, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Quash Subpoenas is denied.
2

 
 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 98 Filed 12/23/05 Pg 1 of 7 Pg ID 1339

1UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

MIRNA E. SERRANO, STEFANIE L. MCVAY, )

and LINDA D. ALLEN, individually and on behalf )

of others similarly situated,

)

)

Plaintiffs, and

)

)

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY

)

COMMISSION,

)

Plaintiff Intervenor,

)

v.

)

)

CINTAS CORPORATION,

)

)

Defendant.

)

Case No. 04-CV-40132 Judge Paul V. Gadola Magistrate Judge Donald A. Scheer

COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND
This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex and to provide appropriate relief to Plaintiffs Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and other women who have been adversely affected by those practices. As alleged with more particularity below, Defendant Cintas Corporation (Defendant) refused to recruit and hire women as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives throughout the State of Michigan and nationwide because of their sex, in violation of Title VII.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 451, 1331, 1337, 1343, and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Sections 705(g)(6) and 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-4 and -5(f)(1)

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 98 Filed 12/23/05 Pg 2 of 7 Pg ID 1340
and (3) (Title VII). 2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, and nationwide as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint.
PARTIES 3. Plaintiffs Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and others as described in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint. 4. Plaintiff-Intervenor Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title VII and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Sections 705(g)(6) and 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-4(g)(6) and -5(f)(1) and (3). 5. At all relevant times, Defendant Cintas Corporation has been a corporation that continuously has been doing business in the State of Michigan and throughout the nation and continuously has had at least 15 employees. 6. At all relevant times, Defendant continuously has been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Sections 701(b), (g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e(b), (g) and (h).
STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 7. All conditions precedent to this intervention have been fulfilled. Attached as Exhibit A is a certification that this case is of general public importance. 8. Since at least June 1999, Defendant has engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). Defendant has denied
2

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 98 Filed 12/23/05 Pg 3 of 7 Pg ID 1341
employment to Plaintiffs Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint by refusing to recruit and hire them as Drivers/Services Sales Representatives because of their sex. 9. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraph 8 above has been to deprive Plaintiffs Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect them because of their sex. 10. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 8 above are and were intentional. 11. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 8 are and were done with malice or reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of Plaintiffs Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women similarly situated as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF Wherefore, EEOC respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers, successors, assigns and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in the unlawful conduct alleged above and any other employment practice that discriminates on the basis of sex.
B. Order Defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs that provide equal employment opportunities for women and eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. Such relief should include adoption of recruitment practices designed to allow women equal access to future employment opportunities as Drivers/Services Sales Representatives.
3

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 98 Filed 12/23/05 Pg 4 of 7 Pg ID 1342
C. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiffs Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint who were denied employment as Drivers/Services Sales Representatives by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices.
D. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint who were denied employment as Drivers/Services Sales Representatives by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraph 8, in amounts to be determined at trial.
E. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint who were denied employment as Drivers/Services Sales Representatives by providing compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraph 8, including compensation for emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial.
F. Order Defendant to pay Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint who were denied employment as Drivers/Services Sales Representatives punitive damages for Defendant’s malicious and reckless conduct as described above, in amounts to be determined at trial.
G. Order Defendant to make whole Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano, Stefanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen and a class of women as alleged in Plaintiffs’ Second Amended Complaint who were denied employment as Drivers/Services Sales Representatives by providing the affirmative relief
4

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 98 Filed 12/23/05 Pg 5 of 7 Pg ID 1343
necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful practices, including but not limited to rightfulplace hiring or, alternatively, front pay.
H. Order Defendant to provide training to its officers and employees regarding Title VII, including the prohibition against sex discrimination.
I. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest.
J. Award the Commission its costs of this action.
JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its Complaint.
Respectfully submitted, JAMES L. LEE Deputy General Counsel s/Adele Rapport ADELE RAPPORT (P44833) Regional Attorney s/Robert K. Dawkins ROBERT K. DAWKINS (P38289) Supervisory Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION 477 Michigan Avenue, Suite 865 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 226-6701 adele.rapport@eeoc.gov robert.dawkins@eeoc.gov
5

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 98 Filed 12/23/05 Pg 6 of 7 Pg ID 1344
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

Exhibit A

Description Certification of Public Importance

6

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 98 Filed 12/23/05 Pg 7 of 7 Pg ID 1345
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, Robert K. Dawkins, certify that on December 23 2005, I electronically filed Plaintiff Intervenor’s COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION AND JURY TRIAL DEMAND with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system which will send notification of such filing to the following: 1) Gena E. Wiltsek, Lieff, Cabraser, 780 Third Avenue, 48th Floor, New York, NY 10017-2024; 2) James K. Fett & Lawrence A. Fields, Fett & Fields, 805 E. Main Street, Pinckney, MI 48169-3266; 3) William G. Tishkoff & A. Poppy Goudsmit, Tishkoff & Assoc., 407 N. Main, Suite 200, Ann Arbor, MI 48104-1158; 4) Richard Talbot Seymour, 1150 Connecticut Ave., NW, Suite 900, Washington, DC 20036-4129; 5) Gregory M. Utter, Keating, Muething, One East Fourth Street, Suite 1400, Cincinnati, OH 45202; 6) Rachel J. Geman, Lieff, Cabraser, 780 Third Avenue, 48th Floor, New York, NY 10017-2024; 7) Theodore R. Opperwall, Kienbaum, Opperwall, 280 S. Old Woodward Avenue, Suite 400, Birmingham, MI 48009-6255; 8) Omar Weaver, 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865, Detroit, Michigan 48226.
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION s/Robert K. Dawkins_____ Robert K. Dawkins (P38289) Attorney for EEOC DETROIT DISTRICT OFFICE 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 226-3406 robert.dawkins@eeoc.gov
7

 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION
MIRNA E. SERRANO, et al.,

v. CINTAS CORPORATION,

Plaintiffs,

CIVIL CASE NO. 04-40132
HONORABLE SEAN F. COX U.S. DISTRICT COURT

Defendant.

Consolidated for pre-trial proceedings with:
BLANCA NELLY AVALOS, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CINTAS CORPORATION,
Defendant. __________________________________/

CIVIL CASE NO. 06-12311
HONORABLE SEAN F. COX U.S. DISTRICT COURT

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION Before the Court are two motions for class certification filed by the two sets of plaintiffs in
the following companion cases which have been consolidated for pretrial purposes: Serrano v. Cintas Corp., Case No. 04-40132, and Avalos v. Cintas Corp., Case No. 06-12311. The parties have conducted extensive discovery and have fully briefed the issues before the Court. A hearing on the motions for class certification was held on February 5, 2009, and continued on February 6, 2009. For the reasons set out below, the Court denies the two motions for class certification. I. Background
The plaintiffs in both of the above-captioned cases have brought discrimination suits against

Defendant Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”), alleging class-wide violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. In the Serrano case, the putative plaintiff class consists of all women who unsuccessfully applied for a position as a Service Sales Representative (“SSR”) with Cintas’s Rental and First Aid & Safety Divisions at any time on or after June 12, 1999, at any Cintas facility located in Michigan. In the Avalos case, the putative plaintiff class consists of all women and all African-American or Hispanic persons who unsuccessfully applied for a SSR position with Cintas’s Rental Division at any time on or after January 20, 2002, at any Cintas location nationwide. Though the putative classes contain different class members, the nature of the allegations brought by the plaintiffs against Cintas are essentially identical. For purposes of this Order, the Court will treat both sets of plaintiffs together (collectively known as “Plaintiffs”). In addition, the analysis for class certification based on gender is similar to that of class certification based on race; accordingly, the Court will treat both requests for class certification together.
Cintas is a national company that provides uniforms and supplies for various businesses. It operates several hundred facilities across the country. These facilities operate in essentially the same manner with the same governing structure, employing SSRs as entry-level sales and customer service representatives. The SSR position has a broad range of duties and responsibilities, including selling, delivering, and replenishing products to Cintas’s clients. In each facility, SSRs are supervised by Service Managers, who in turn report to the General Manager controlling the operations of each facility. In addition to a common corporate structure, Cintas uses common orientation manuals and policy statements throughout its facilities. Cintas has standard courses and training sessions for managers and SSRs. What is particularly relevant to Plaintiffs’ allegations is the fact that Cintas has a standard system for hiring SSRs. This hiring process includes an initial screening of the
2

application, a series of interviews, a route ride with another SSR, standardized tests, an exchange of information among hiring managers, and a final hiring decision made by the General Manager of the Cintas facility. The hiring process has both objective and subjective components; some of the criteria considered in hiring are objective or “must have” considerations such as having a GED or high school diploma, while other criteria are subjective or “preferred” considerations such as having previous sales experience.
Plaintiffs allege that they unsuccessfully applied for the SSR position and that they suffered discrimination on the basis of their gender and race when Cintas failed to hire them. Much of Plaintiffs’ case for discrimination rests on a statistical analysis of the percentage of women and racial minorities in the available labor market from which SSRs are hired. Plaintiffs claim that women and racial minorities were hired at levels significantly below reasonable measures of availability and that this underhiring has been consistent at hundreds of Cintas locations across the country. Plaintiffs argue that this dearth of minority hiring is a result of Cintas’s highly subjective hiring process and Cintas’s common corporate culture, which perpetuates a belief that a white male is the best candidate for the SSR job position. Accordingly, Plaintiffs argue that there is a nationwide practice of discrimination against women and racial minorities in SSR hiring and that class action relief is merited. Plaintiffs allege both disparate impact and disparate treatment theories of liability, and seek, among other things, injunctive and declaratory relief, back pay and front pay, nominal compensatory damages, and punitive damages. II. Motions to Strike
As a preliminary matter and before addressing the issue of class certification, the Court considers the following motions to strike filed by the parties: (1) Cintas’s motion to strike the expert
3

report prepared by Dr. Barbara Reskin as being inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and the Daubert analysis; (2) Cintas’s motion to strike certain portions of declarations submitted by various individual plaintiffs; and (3) Plaintiffs’ motion to strike certain portions of declarations submitted by various Cintas employees. These motions attempt to limit the evidence that the Court can consider in determining whether class certification is warranted.
The expert report at issue in Cintas’s first motion to strike is a report prepared by Plaintiffs’ expert sociologist, Dr. Barbara Reskin. The expert report purports to show that the discretion and subjectivity inherent in Cintas’s hiring methods permits Cintas’s managers to be influenced by a culture of stereotyping, and accordingly, leads the managers to make biased and discriminatory hiring decisions. Cintas argues that the expert report fails a Daubert analysis and should be stricken.
Currently, this case is at the class certification stage. A Daubert analysis at this stage of litigation is unnecessary. See Bacon v. Honda of Am. Mfg., 205 F.R.D. 466, 470 (S.D. Ohio 2001) (hereinafter Bacon I) (“Courts have declined to engage in a Daubert analysis at the class certification stage of the action on the ground that an inquiry into the admissibility of the proposed expert testimony under Daubert would be an inappropriate consideration of the merits of the plaintiff's claims.”) (citations omitted). The expert report has been offered as evidence supporting class certification, and as such, the Court will carefully consider this evidence and will give it as much weight as is appropriate under the circumstances. See id. at 470-71; In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 552 F.3d 305, 323 (3d Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the Court denies the motion to strike the expert report.
In the other two motions to strike, both Plaintiffs and Cintas request that the Court strike certain portions of the declarations, arguing that the declarations are inadmissible under the Federal
4

Rules of Evidence. Just as with the motion to strike the expert report, the Court denies the motions
to strike portions of the declarations. At this stage of litigation, the Court should consider all the
evidence presented in support of and in opposition to class certification, and grant to the evidence
the weight that the Court finds is most appropriate. See Bacon I, 205 F.R.D. at 469-70.
In so ruling, the Court makes no determination regarding the future admissibility of the
expert report or of the declarations at trial. See, e.g., In re Hydrogen Peroxide Antitrust Litig., 552
F.3d at 324 (“A court’s determination that an expert’s opinion is persuasive or unpersuasive on a
Rule 23 requirement does not preclude a different view at the merits stage of the case.”). The parties
are permitted to file renewed motions to strike at a later date, if they so desire. See, e.g., Bacon I,
205 F.R.D. at 469-71.
III. Motions for Class Certification
A. Legal Standard
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 governs the granting of class certification:
(a) Prerequisites. One or more members of a class may sue or be sued as representative parties on behalf of all members only if:
(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable; (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class; (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class; and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.
(b) Types of Class Actions. A class action may be maintained if Rule 23(a) is satisfied and if:
(1) prosecuting separate actions by or against individual class members would create a risk of:
(A) inconsistent or varying adjudications with respect to individual class members that would establish incompatible standards of conduct for the party opposing the class; or
(B) adjudications with respect to individual class members that, as a
5

practical matter, would be dispositive of the interests of the other members not parties to the individual adjudications or would substantially impair or impede their ability to protect their interests;
(2) the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class, so that final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a whole; or
(3) the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy. The matters pertinent to these findings include:
(A) the class members’ interests in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate actions;
(B) the extent and nature of any litigation concerning the controversy already begun by or against class members;
(C) the desirability or undesirability of concentrating the litigation of the claims in the particular forum; and
(D) the likely difficulties in managing a class action.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 23. “The party seeking the class certification bears the burden of proof.” In re
American Medical Sys., 75 F.3d 1069, 1079 (6th Cir. 1996). Accordingly, Plaintiffs have the burden
of first showing that all the prerequisites in subsection (a) of Rule 23 are satisfied. Once the Rule
23(a) prerequisites are established, Plaintiffs must then show that one of the three subsections of
Rule 23(b) is also met. Id. “[A] district court may not certify any class without ‘rigorous analysis’
of the requirements of Rule 23.” Sprague v. GMC, 133 F.3d 388, 397 (6th Cir. 1998) (citing
General Tel. Co. v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147, 161 (1982)).
B. Rule 23(a) Analysis
1. Numerosity
Rule 23(a)(1) requires that the class be “so numerous that joinder of all members is
impracticable.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(1). Plaintiffs note that the proposed class would contain
thousands of members. Cintas does not dispute this and concedes that Plaintiffs have satisfied the
first element of numerosity.
6

2. Commonality To satisfy commonality, the second element of Rule 23(a), Plaintiffs must show that “there are questions of law or fact common to the class.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(2). Plaintiffs argue that commonality is satisfied because Cintas has a common set of hiring policies and procedures leading to the discrimination of women and racial minorities. Plaintiffs note that Cintas’s business is structured in a common manner throughout all of Cintas’s facilities nationwide, that the job descriptions and job functions of the SSR position are standardized, and that Cintas uses common hiring practices. Plaintiffs argue that Cintas managers have broad discretion in hiring and that there is a strong corporate culture common to all Cintas locations that perpetuates the image of a white male as being the ideal candidate for the SSR position. Plaintiffs allege that the broad hiring discretion and corporate culture leads to biases and stereotypes in hiring, resulting in favoring white males over women and racial minorities. In support, Plaintiffs base much of their case on a statistical analysis that purportedly shows that women and racial minorities are underhired as SSRs at Cintas facilities nationwide. Consequently, Plaintiffs argue that there is a pattern of discrimination across all of Cintas’s facilities and that there are common questions of law and fact appropriate for class certification. In opposition, Cintas contends that commonality is not satisfied. Cintas argues that the hiring decisions for SSR positions are made by thousands of individual facility-level managers at hundreds of Cintas facilities. Cintas also argues that the hiring process involves many different factors, has varied over time and by facility, and depends on the market-driven needs of the particular facility and the available applicant pools. After carefully considering the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, the Court
7

finds that Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate “questions of law or fact common to the class” that
are sufficient to support class certification under either disparate impact or disparate treatment
theories. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(2).
Class certification is “particularly appropriate” when the issues involved are common to the class as a whole and when they turn on questions of law applicable in the same manner to each member of the class. [Gen. Tel. Co. of the Southwest v. Falcon, 457 U.S. 147, 154-56 (1982)]. . . .
“It is not every common question that will suffice, however;” rather, it must be “a common issue the resolution of which will advance the litigation.” Sprague v. General Motors Corp., 133 F.3d 388, 397 (6th Cir. 1998). Conclusory allegations of commonality or across-the-board discrimination will not satisfy the burden of proof on certification. Falcon, 457 U.S. at 157 (there is a wide gap between an individual plaintiff’s claim of race discrimination, coupled with an unsupported allegation of a company policy of discrimination, and the existence of a class of persons who have suffered the same injury as the individual plaintiff); [In re American Medical Sys., 75 F.3d 1069, 1081 (6th Cir. 1996)] (conclusory allegations on commonality not sufficient).
Bacon I, 205 F.R.D. at 476-77 (affirmed by Bacon v. Honda of Am. Mfg., 370 F.3d 565 (6th Cir.
2004) (hereinafter Bacon II)).
In this case, the hiring process is not entirely subjective, but involves objective components
such as requiring a high school diploma or its equivalent, having a valid driver’s license and a good
driving record, or having no criminal record. Some courts have found that only an entirely subjective
decision making process, unlike the one in the instant case, can support a finding of “a general policy
of discrimination.” See Bacon I, 205 F.R.D. at 477 (citing Gen. Tel. Co. of the Southwest v. Falcon,
457 U.S. 147, 159, n.15 (1982) and Appleton v. Deloitte & Touche LLP, 168 F.R.D. 221, 228 (M.D.
Tenn. 1996)). More importantly, the hiring process in this case is conducted by thousands of Cintas
managers at hundreds of Cintas facilities. Hiring decisions are made for a diverse range of reasons
and depend on widely differing circumstances at each facility, such as the available applicant pools
8

and the hiring needs at a particular facility. Courts in similar circumstances have found that commonality is not established. See Bacon I, 205 F.R.D. at 479; Rhodes v. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc., 213 F.R.D. 619, 676 (N.D. Ga. 2003) (listing several cases finding that commonality is not satisfied where “geographic diversity or an absence of centralized decision-making exists, or where different decision-makers made the challenged decisions”). Furthermore, Cintas has presented evidence that many of the individual members of the proposed class were not hired by Cintas for legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons. In fact, previously in this case, summary judgment has been granted in Cintas’s favor regarding two individual plaintiffs who did not suffer discrimination as a matter of law. See Order Granting Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Avalos (docket entry #267, June 19, 2008); Order Granting Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Jones (docket entry #366, Oct. 7, 2008). Cintas has also presented evidence of instances where a putative class member was not hired for an open job position but was passed over for a woman or a racial minority, thereby undermining a credible claim of discrimination. Moreover, the hiring process has many different steps, including an application screening, background checks, interviews, and a route ride. Several of Cintas’s managers involved in the hiring process are women or racial minorities themselves. Putative class members would have suffered the alleged discrimination in different ways at different stages of the hiring process, and depending on the different Cintas employees involved at each hiring stage. For all these reasons, the Court concludes that these individual circumstances surrounding the non-hiring of each proposed member of the class preclude a finding that commonality is satisfied.
The Court finds that the cases cited by Plaintiffs in support of commonality are not persuasive. Plaintiffs’ most authoritative case, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals case of Senter v.
9

GMC, 532 F.2d 511 (6th Cir. 1976), is distinguishable on the facts. The class in Senter consisted of African-American employees at a single facility who were denied promotions while having objective qualifications equivalent to white employees. Senter, 532 F.2d at 523. In contrast, the class in this case consists of employees with differing objective qualifications who were denied employment at hundreds of different facilities with varied applicant pools, hiring needs, and hiring managers. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals itself has distinguished the Senter case on similar grounds in the Bacon v. Honda of Am. Mfg case. See Bacon II, 370 F.3d at 572. The remainder of Plaintiffs’ cases applicable to the current situation and cited in support of commonality involve challenges against employment practices that are much more limited in scope and geography than the practices of Cintas here.
In an attempt to show a common, class-wide discriminatory impact, Plaintiffs rely extensively on an analysis of certain statistical evidence allegedly indicating under-representation of women and racial minorities in SSR positions at Cintas locations. The Court has closely considered the statistical evidence presented by both parties. After such consideration, the Court is not persuaded by Plaintiffs’ statistical analysis. Cintas has its own statistical experts who contest the methods, statistical models, and relevant applicant pools used by Plaintiffs’ experts in interpreting the data. Cintas also observes that even assuming Plaintiffs’ own interpretation of the statistical data, although some Cintas locations under-hired women and racial minorities, other locations over-hired women and racial minorities during the same time period. In addition, when using Plaintiffs’ own statistical analysis, some Cintas locations which under-hired women over-hired racial minorities, creating an inherent conflict among the proposed classes. Moreover, not only did the hiring patterns fluctuate between particular Cintas locations, but even at individual locations,
10

patterns of under-hiring and over-hiring fluctuated from year to year. These discrepancies undermine a conclusion that the statistics are sufficient to demonstrate that there is a common, class-wide discriminatory impact against the putative class members.
Plaintiffs also rely on the expert testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin, a sociologist who submitted a report purporting to show that a common white male business culture at Cintas tends to perpetuate its culture by discriminating against women and racial minorities. Cintas contests the validity of Dr. Reskin’s scientific methods and conclusions. After a close consideration of the parties’ respective positions, the Court comes to the conclusion that Dr. Reskin’s report is not persuasive. First, the Court is skeptical of the scientific reliability of Dr. Reskin’s report. Second, Dr. Reskin’s observations that people tend to have personal biases is entirely insufficient to support the claim that in this particular case, Cintas managers acted on their biases and discriminated against women and racial minorities. If the Court were to give Dr. Reskin’s report any substantial weight, it would vitiate the clear requirement in law and public policy that a plaintiff present more than mere allegations and conjecture in order to support a claim of discrimination. See, e.g., Bacon II, 370 F.3d at 571 (“Conclusory allegations and general assertions of discrimination are not sufficient to establish commonality.”)
In fact, contrary to Dr. Reskin’s position that Cintas has a white male business culture, Cintas has presented evidence of sincere attempts to achieve greater diversity in its company. Cintas has a company policy in favor of diversity and personnel devoted to diversity considerations in the company. Internal memoranda and statements by Cintas’s CEO at Cintas’s annual meeting demonstrate endeavors to target women and racial minorities in the interests of increasing diversity. Plaintiffs’ attempt to turn these examples of Cintas’s commitment to diversity into evidence that
11

Cintas has a problematic culture of discrimination that requires remedying and, thus, into evidence that Cintas discriminated against the putative class members is entirely unpersuasive.
Actual direct evidence of discrimination against individual applicants is scant. Plaintiffs submit some testimonial evidence consisting of statements made to female applicants by Cintas employees during the hiring process. These statements include references to the fact that the SSR position involves heavy lifting, going into male locker rooms, and dealing with dirty laundry. Plaintiffs argue that these statements reveal that the Cintas managers had biases against women applicants and were trying to dissuade them from pursuing a job as a SSR. The Court does not find that these statements are compelling instances of discrimination against women. These statements could be interpreted as instances of Cintas managers giving applicants full disclosure of the demands and duties of the SSR position. Even assuming that these statements constituted particular instances of discrimination, commonality is not satisfied; on the contrary, these statements illustrate that the circumstances of discrimination are highly individualized and cannot be adequately treated in a generalized class action setting. The Court also notes that for the Avalos case alleging class-wide discrimination based on race, there is a noticeable lack of similar statements by Cintas managers or any other evidence supporting particular instances of racial discrimination.
In conclusion, after considering all the evidence presented by the parties, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to show that “there are questions of law or fact common to the class,” sufficient to support class certification. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(2).
3. Typicality The Court also finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy the third Rule 23(a) prerequisite, typicality. Rule 23(a)(3) requires that “the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical
12

of the claims or defenses of the class.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(3). As the Sixth Circuit has stated in the Reeb case:
[T]he typicality requirement is not met if the named plaintiffs do not represent an adequate cross-section of the claims asserted by the rest of the class. Employment discrimination claims require proof that particular managers took particular employment actions and that either the managers were motivated by a discriminatory animus or the actions resulted in a disparate impact upon the class; the district court is therefore required to examine the incidents, people involved, motivations, and consequences regarding each of the named plaintiffs’ claims to determine the typicality element of Rule 23(a). Reeb v. Ohio Dep’t of Rehab. & Corr., Belmont Corr. Inst., 435 F.3d 639, 645 (6th Cir. 2006). Here, as discussed above, thousands of managers at hundreds of Cintas locations made hiring decisions based on widely differing objective and subjective factors and based on the particular available applicant pool and particular hiring needs of each facility. Each putative class member’s claim of discrimination would require an individualized and fact-intensive inquiry into the particular circumstances of the decision not to hire the SSR applicant. A plaintiff who proves his own discrimination claim against Cintas would not necessarily have proven someone else’s claim of discrimination. Thus, one class member’s claim would not necessarily be typical of another class member’s claim. In addition, Cintas has provided evidence demonstrating that some purported class members do not have a valid discrimination claim because their employments applications were rejected for legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons. As mentioned above, Cintas has previously prevailed on summary judgment on two occasions against two named members of the class who did not suffer discrimination as a matter of law. Moreover, since Cintas has unique defenses against each class member’s individual claim, the case is unsuitable for class action. “Where a class definition
13

encompasses many individuals who have no claim at all to the relief requested, or where there are defenses unique to the individual claims of the class members, Beck v. Maximus, Inc., 457 F.3d 291, 296 (3d Cir. 2006), the typicality premise is lacking, for – under those circumstances – it cannot be said that a class member who proves his own claim would necessarily prove the claims of other class members.” Romberio v. UnumProvident Corp., 2009 WL 87510 (6th Cir. Jan. 12, 2009) (unpublished).
For each group of plaintiffs (the Serrano female plaintiffs, the Avalos female plaintiffs, and the Avalos racial minority plaintiffs), Cintas persuasively argues that the claims and defenses of the named plaintiffs are not typical of the unnamed class members. Cintas accomplishes this by referencing individual applicants by name and by contrasting their situations with those of other applicants. In so doing, Cintas shows that applicants were not hired at different stages of the hiring process: some applicants were rejected at the initial application screening stage, other applicants were rejected after their interviews, and others were rejected after their route rides. In addition, applicants were rejected for a variety of reasons, including making false disclosures on the application, having insufficient work experience, and having disqualifying felony convictions. Moreover, Cintas notes that in many cases where there was a rejected application, either the position was later filled by another woman or racial minority or there was not an open position to be filled in the first place.
Plaintiffs respond by contesting Cintas’s characterizations of the circumstances surrounding the rejected applicants. In fact, at the February 5, 2009 hearing, the parties argued about the circumstances surrounding the non-hiring of some particular applicants, and were required to later submit supplemental briefing about the contested applicants. Plaintiffs also argue that many of the
14

disqualifiers for female and racial minority applicants cited by Cintas as legitimate defenses to the rejected applications were not disqualifiers for some successful white male applicants. These disputes between the parties regarding the specifics of particular applicants to the SSR position tend to support the Court’s conclusion that individualized and fact-intensive inquiries are required in order to determine discrimination, that the elements of commonality and typicality are lacking, and that this case is not suited for class certification.
Consequently, for the above reasons, the Court concludes that the claims of the named class members are not typical of those of the unnamed class members. Plaintiffs have failed to show that “the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class,” sufficient to support class certification. Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(3).
4. Adequacy of Representation The final Rule 23(a) prerequisite is adequacy of representation which requires that “the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(a)(4). To satisfy this prerequisite, “1) the representative must have common interests with unnamed members of the class, and 2) it must appear that the representatives will vigorously prosecute the interests of the class through qualified counsel.” In re American Medical Sys., 75 F.3d 1069, 1083 (6th Cir. 1996). Plaintiffs argue that this prerequisite is satisfied because the class representatives have common interests with the unnamed class members, namely ending discrimination, and because the class counsel is qualified and prepared to vigorously pursue the class interests. In this case, the Court finds that the named class members may not have common interests with the other unnamed members of the class and, thus, are not adequate class representatives.
15

Plaintiffs have limited the compensatory damages of absent class members to a nominal amount, even though there is indication that some of those class members believe that they may be entitled to a full award of compensatory damages, including emotional damages. A class action suit may preclude the ability of certain members of the class from pursuing compensatory damages to which they have a legitimate right. This creates a conflict between the interests of the named and unnamed class members and, consequently, the class representatives would be unable to fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class. See O’Neal v. Wackenhut Servs., 2006 WL 1469348 (E.D. Tenn. May 25, 2006) (unpublished).
Accordingly, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy the fourth Rule 23(a) prerequisite, adequacy of representation.
C. Rule 23(b) Analysis Though Plaintiffs’ cases for class certification fail because the Rule 23(a) prerequisites have not been satisfied, the Court also finds that Plaintiffs have failed to satisfy one of the conditions set out in Rule 23(b).
1. Rule 23(b)(2) Plaintiffs seek certification of their disparate impact claim under Rule 23(b)(2). Certification under Rule 23(b)(2) is proper where “the party opposing the class has acted or refused to act on grounds that apply generally to the class, so that final injunctive relief or corresponding declaratory relief is appropriate respecting the class as a whole.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2). Plaintiffs seek injunctive and declaratory relief, including a decree ending Cintas’s discriminatory practices and implementation of a reporting, record-keeping, and monitoring system. Plaintiffs also seek, among other things, back pay and front pay. Plaintiffs argue that Rule 23(b)(2) is proper because Cintas has
16

acted in ways generally applicable to the class (by a hiring policy and a corporate culture that discriminates against women and racial minorities) and that the primary relief they are seeking is declarative and injunctive.
The Court disagrees with Plaintiffs. First, Plaintiffs have failed to show that Cintas acted in a manner “that appl[ies] generally to the class.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2). As discussed above in the sections on commonality and typicality, Plaintiffs are contesting a hiring process that involved thousands of managers at hundreds of Cintas locations making highly individualized decisions based on objective and subjective criteria.
Second, the damages sought by Plaintiffs would require individualized determinations inappropriate for a class action sought pursuant to Rule 23(b)(2), which is used to pursue injunctive or declaratory relief. Monetary relief in Rule 23(b)(2) class actions should be incidental to the requested injunctive or declaratory relief. Reeb, 435 F.3d at 647 (citing Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., 151 F.3d 402 (5th Cir. 1998)). If the nature of the damages calculations is individualized and if the proposed class members have an ability to bring individual actions, the damages claims “necessarily predominate over requested declaratory or injunctive relief” and the requested damages cannot be recovered pursuant to Rule 23(b)(2). Reeb, 435 F.3d at 651. In this case, Plaintiffs are seeking back pay and front pay. After a review of the parties’ arguments, the Court finds Cintas’s position to be more persuasive and concludes that back pay and front pay would require individualized determinations for each class member.
In addition, the Avalos plaintiffs are seeking punitive damages against Cintas. The request for punitive damages would also require individualized determinations and, thus, is not suitable for Rule 23(b)(2) certification.
17

In conclusion, even if Plaintiffs had met all the requirements of Rule 23(a), the Court finds that Rule 23(b)(2) certification is not appropriate under the current circumstances.
2. Rule 23(b)(3) Plaintiffs also seek certification of their class action pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3). Certification under Rule 23(b)(3) is proper where “the court finds that the questions of law or fact common to class members predominate over any questions affecting only individual members, and that a class action is superior to other available methods for fairly and efficiently adjudicating the controversy.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3). Rule 23(b)(3) is a more demanding requirement than the finding of commonality in Rule 23(a)(2), as it requires that common issues “predominate” over individual issues. See Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591, 623-23 (1997). Plaintiffs argue that class issues do predominate, and that a class action is the superior method for handling all the claims fairly and efficiently. The Court disagrees with Plaintiffs’ position. As discussed above in the sections on commonality and typicality, this case requires individualized inquiries into the actions of thousands of Cintas managers and the particular circumstances surrounding the non-hiring of each particular class member. Assuming that particular class members can put forward prima facie cases of discrimination, Cintas has the opportunity to rebut the cases with unique defenses by demonstrating that there were legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for the non-hirings, which would necessitate individualized examinations into the circumstances of each class member’s job application. Accordingly, individual liability issues would predominate over any common issues. Furthermore, individual damages issues predominate over common issues. Plaintiffs seek nominal compensatory damages, punitive damages, and back pay and front pay. Assuming that
18

liability is shown, a determination of damages necessitates considerations into the particular circumstances of discrimination against each individual class member. See Allison, 151 F.3d at 419.
These individualized issues undermine Plaintiffs’ argument that a class action is the superior method for handling all claims fairly and efficiently. For example, inquiries into whether Cintas had legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons to reject particular applicants would require thousands of individual proceedings for each individual class member. Plaintiffs’ proposal for bifurcating the liability and damages portions of the trial would not remedy this situation, as there are individualized issues of both liability and damages. A class action would not fairly and efficiently adjudicate the claims currently before the Court. Accordingly, even assuming that the Rule 23(a) prerequisites were satisfied, class certification pursuant to Rule 23(b)(3) would not be appropriate under the circumstances. IV. Conclusion
For the reasons stated above, the Court finds that Plaintiffs have failed to demonstrate that the commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation prerequisites of Rule 23(a) are satisfied. In addition, even assuming that the Rule 23(a) prerequisites are satisfied, the Court finds that class certification would not be appropriate under either Rule 23(b)(2) or (b)(3). These conclusions by the Court apply to the plaintiffs alleging gender discrimination in the Serrano case, the plaintiffs alleging gender discrimination in the Avalos case, and the plaintiffs alleging racial discrimination in the Avalos case. The class action claims by these putative class members all suffer from the same deficiencies discussed above, precluding certification of their respective classes.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Cintas’s motion to strike the expert report prepared by Dr. Barbara Reskin as being inadmissible under Federal Rule of Evidence 702
19

and the Daubert analysis [docket entry #484 of Case No. 04-40132; docket entry #340 of Case No. 06-12311]; (2) Cintas’s motion to strike certain portions of declarations submitted by various individual plaintiffs [docket entry #492 of Case No. 04-40132; docket entry #348 of Case No. 0612311]; and (3) Plaintiffs’ motion to strike certain portions of declarations submitted by various Cintas employees [docket entry #596 of Case no. 04-40132; docket entry #450 of Case No. 0612311] are DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ motions for class certification [docket entries #411, #418 of Case No. 04-40132; docket entries #268, #275 of Case No. 06-12311] are DENIED.
SO ORDERED. S/Sean F. Cox Sean F. Cox United States District Judge
Dated: March 31, 2009 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was served upon counsel of record on March 31, 2009, by electronic and/or ordinary mail.
S/Jennifer Hernandez Case Manager
20

 
 2:04-Ccavs-4e0: 11302-2-S6F29C-RSDWocuDmoecnt#: 010681711F4i9le5d21517/09F/1il2ed:P1g11/0o9f/22012Pg IDPa4g4e3:816 (1 of 33)

Deborah S. Hunt Clerk

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT
100 EAST FIFTH STREET, ROOM 540 POTTER STEWART U.S. COURTHOUSE
CINCINNATI, OHIO 45202-3988

Tel. (513) 564-7000 www.ca6.uscourts.gov

Filed: November 09, 2012
Ms. Jennifer S. Goldstein U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Office of General Counsel 131 M Street, N.E. Washington, DC 20507
Ms. Rachael A. Rowe Mr. Gregory M. Utter Keating, Muething & Klekamp One E. Fourth Street, Suite 1400 Cincinnati, OH 45202
Re: Case Nos. 10-2629/11-2057, Mirna Serrano, et al v. Cintas Corporation Originating Case Nos. : 2:04-cv-40132 ; 2:06-cv-12311
Dear Counsel,
The court today announced its decision in the above-styled cases.
Enclosed is a copy of the court's opinion together with the judgment which has been entered in conformity with Rule 36, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.
Yours very truly,
Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

cc: Mr. David J. Weaver Enclosures Mandate to issue.

Cathryn Lovely Deputy Clerk

2:04-Ccavs-4e0: 11302-2-S6F29C-RSDWocuDmoecnt#: 010681711F4i9le5d21510/09F/1il2ed:P1g12/0o9f/22012Pg IDPa4g4e3:817 (33 of 33)

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

MIRNA E. SERRANO et al., Plaintiffs,

Nos. 10-2629/11-2057

FILED
Nov 09, 2012
DEBORAH S. HUNT, Clerk

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff Intervenor - Appellant,

v.

CINTAS CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.

Before: MOORE, GIBBONS, and ALARCÓN, Circuit Judges.

JUDGMENT

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit.

THIS CAUSE was heard on the record from the district court and was argued by counsel.

IN CONSIDERATION WHEREOF, it is ORDERED that both judgments of the district court at issue in the present appeals are VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with the opinion of this court.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

Deborah S. Hunt, Clerk

 
 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 1095 Filed 03/13/13 Pg 1 of 6 Pg ID 44404

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Plaintiff,
v. CINTAS CORPORATION,
Defendant.

) ) ) ) Civil Case No. 04-40132 ) ) Judge Sean F. Cox ) ) Magistrate Judge R. Steven ) Whalen ) ) )

EEOC’s Second Amended Complaint and Jury Trial Demand
This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex, and to provide appropriate relief to a class of women who have been adversely affected by those practices. As alleged with more particularity in paragraph 7 below, Defendant Cintas Corporation refused to recruit and hire women as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives throughout the State of Michigan because of their sex, in violation of Title VII.

Jurisdiction and Venue
1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 451, 1331, 1337, 1343, and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3) (“Title VII”) and Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, 42 U.S.C. § 1981a.

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 1095 Filed 03/13/13 Pg 2 of 6 Pg ID 44405
2. The employment practices alleged to be unlawful were committed within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan and throughout the State of Michigan.
Parties
3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the “Commission”), is the agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of Title VII, and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3).
4. At all relevant times, Defendant, Cintas Corporation (the “Employer”), has been a corporation that continuously has been doing business in the State of Michigan and continuously has had at least 15 employees.
5. At all relevant times, Defendant Employer continuously has been an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 701(b), (g), and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(b), (g), and (h).
Statement of Claims
6. More than thirty days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Mirna E. Serrano filed a charge with the Commission alleging violations of Title VII by Defendant Employer. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled.
7. Since at least June 1999, Defendant Employer has engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of Section 703(a) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-2(a). Defendant Employer has engaged in a pattern or
2

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 1095 Filed 03/13/13 Pg 3 of 6 Pg ID 44406
practice of sex discrimination by refusing to recruit and hire a class of females for the position of Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives at Defendant Employer’s facilities in Michigan because of their sex. The affected class is comprised of those females who applied at one of Defendant Employer’s facilities in Michigan from 1999 to at least April 1, 2005 and were not hired to be a Route Sales Driver/Service Sales Representative.
8. The effect of the practices complained of in paragraph 7 above has been to deprive a class of women in Michigan of equal employment opportunities and otherwise adversely affect them, because of their sex.
9. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above are and were intentional.
10. The unlawful employment practices complained of in paragraph 7 above are and were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights of a class of women in Michigan who were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives because of their sex.
Prayer for Relief
Wherefore, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant Employer, its officers, successors, agents, servants, assigns, employees, attorneys, and all persons in active concert or participation with them, from refusing to hire females as Route Sales Drivers/Services Sales Representatives on the basis of sex.
3

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 1095 Filed 03/13/13 Pg 4 of 6 Pg ID 44407
B. Order Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs that provide equal employment opportunities for women and eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices. Such relief should include adoption of recruitment practices designed to allow women equal access to future employment opportunities as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales representatives.
C. Order Defendant Employer to make whole the class of women who were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives in Michigan, by providing appropriate backpay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial.
D. Order Defendant Employer to make whole the class of women who were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives in Michigan, by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraph 7 above, in amounts to be determined at trial.
E. Order Defendant Employer to make whole the class of women who were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives in Michigan, by providing compensation for past and future nonpecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful practices complained of in paragraph 7 above, including compensation for emotional pain, suffering, inconvenience, loss of enjoyment of life, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial.
F. Order Defendant Employer to pay the class of women who were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives in
4

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 1095 Filed 03/13/13 Pg 5 of 6 Pg ID 44408
Michigan, punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct described
above, in amounts to be determined at trial.
G. Order Defendant Employer to make whole the class of women who
were denied employment as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives
in Michigan, by providing the affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the
effects of its unlawful employment practices, including but not limited to
rightful-place hiring or, alternatively, frontpay.
H. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper
in the public interest.
I. Award the Commission its costs of this action.
Jury Trial Demand
The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its
complaint.
Respectfully submitted,
LAURIE A. YOUNG, #11480-49 Regional Attorney
MICHELLE EISELE, #12070-49 Supervisory Trial Attorney
/s/ Kenneth L. Bird KENNETH L. BIRD, Indiana #10780-02 Senior Trial Attorney
EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Indianapolis District Office 101 W. Ohio St., Suite 1900 Indianapolis IN 46204-4203 Phone: (317) 226-7204 Fax: (317) 226-5571 E-mail: Kenneth.Bird@EEOC.gov
5

2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW Doc # 1095 Filed 03/13/13 Pg 6 of 6 Pg ID 44409
Certificate of Service
I certify that on this 6th day of February, 2013, I electronically filed the foregoing Second Amended Complaint with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which will automatically send notification of the filing to all counsel of record.
/s/ Kenneth L. Bird KENNETH L. BIRD, Indiana #10780-02 Senior Trial Attorney EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION Indianapolis District Office 101 W. Ohio St., Suite 1900 Indianapolis IN 46204-4203 Phone: (317) 226-7204 Fax: (317) 226-5571 E-mail: Kenneth.Bird@EEOC.gov
6

 
 Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45732 Page 1 of 31

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, v. CINTAS CORPORATION,
Defendant.

) Civil Case No. 04-40132
) ) Hon. Sean F. Cox
) ) Magistrate Judge R.
) Steven Whalen )
) )
) )

CONSENT DECREE The Parties have filed a Joint Motion for Entry of Consent Decree, and the Court being duly advised now grants that Motion and enters the following Consent Decree.

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45733 Page 2 of 31
TABLE OF CONTENTS PART ONE: GENERAL PROVISIONS ......................................... 3 Section 101: Scope of Decree ...................................................................... 3 Section 102: Non‐Discrimination in Employment......................................... 3 Section 103: Non‐Retaliation....................................................................... 3 Section 104: Effective Date.......................................................................... 4 Section 105: Record Retention .................................................................... 4 PART TWO: POSTING, TRAINING, RECRUITMENT, AND HIRING PROCESS........................................................................... 5 Section 201: Posting .................................................................................... 5 Section 202: Diversity, harassment and anti‐discrimination training ........... 6 Section 203: Hiring training ......................................................................... 6 Section 204: Recruitment ............................................................................ 7 Section 205: Hiring Practice or Process ........................................................ 8 Section 206: Enforcement of Hiring Practice or Process ............................... 9 PART THREE: MONETARY RELIEF FOR CLASS MEMBERS
9 Section 301: Eligibility as Class Members..................................................... 9 Section 302: Amount of Back Pay and Interest ............................................ 9 Section 303: Determination of Individuals Who Will Get Relief ................. 10 PART FOUR: CLAIMS PROCESS AND FAIRNESS HEARING
10 Section 401: Claims Administrator............................................................. 10

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45734 Page 3 of 31
Section 402: Notice of Proposed Distribution ............................................ 11 Section 403: Class Members Eligible for Relief........................................... 12 Section 404: Letters of Disagreement ........................................................ 12 Section 405: Fairness Hearing .................................................................... 13 Section 406: Payments to Class Members.................................................. 13 PART FIVE: CONTINGENCY FOR REMAINING FUNDS .... 14 PART SIX: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS............................. 15 Section 601: Procedure ............................................................................. 15 Section 602: Initial Report ......................................................................... 15 Section 603: Annual Reports ..................................................................... 15 PART SEVEN: ADMINISTRATION OF THE DECREE .......... 17 Section 701: Role of EEOC.......................................................................... 17 Section 702: EEOC Monitoring ................................................................... 17 Section 703: Court Enforcement ................................................................ 18 Section 704: Successor Liability ................................................................. 18 PART EIGHT: COSTS ................................................................... 19 PART NINE: RETENTION OF JURISDICTION ...................... 19 Section 901: Term of the Decree ............................................................... 19 Section 902: Retention of Jurisdiction and Enforcement of Decree............ 19 PART TEN: OTHER PROVISIONS............................................ 20 Section 1001: Complete Financial Obligations ........................................... 20 Section 1002: Severability ......................................................................... 20
ii

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45735 Page 4 of 31
Section 1003: Amendment ........................................................................ 20 Section 1004: Computation of Time Periods .............................................. 21
iii

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45736 Page 5 of 31
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“Commission” or “EEOC”) alleges in its Second Amended Complaint that, since at least June 1999, Defendant Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”) has failed to recruit and hire a class of females for the position of route sales driver/service sales representative in Michigan. Cintas denies the EEOC’s allegations.
The Commission and Cintas hereby stipulate to the jurisdiction of the Court over the parties and the subject matter.
The EEOC and Cintas have advised the Court that they desire to resolve the claims in the EEOC’s Second Amended Complaint without the burden, expense, and delay of further litigation.
It is, therefore, the finding of the Court, based on the pleadings and the record as a whole, that: (1) the Court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action, (2) implementation of this Decree will advance the purposes and provisions of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17
2

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45737 Page 6 of 31
(“Title VII”), and (3) this Consent Decree resolves the claims in the EEOC’s Second Amended Complaint. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED as follows: PART ONE: GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 101: Scope of Decree
Unless otherwise stated, this Decree applies to all of Cintas’s Rental Division facilities in the state of Michigan, whether now existing or hereafter acquired or opened during the duration of the Decree. Section 102: Non-Discrimination in Employment
Cintas is enjoined from discriminating against females in hiring for the position of service sales representative (“SSR”). Section 103: Non-Retaliation
Cintas will not retaliate or discriminate against any of its employees, former employees, or applicants for employment, including but not limited to any individual who assisted or participated in this lawsuit, because the individual has (a) made a
3

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45738 Page 7 of 31
charge or opposed an unlawful employment practice under Title VII or any other law enforced by the EEOC or (b) assisted or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing under Title VII or any other law enforced by the EEOC. Section 104: Effective Date
The effective date of this Decree shall be the date of the Court’s entry of the Consent Decree. This Decree does not affect the Commission’s right to file suit based on charges pending at the administrative level or on any subsequently filed charges even if those charges allege violations occurring prior to the entry of this Decree. Section 105: Record Retention
Cintas will maintain all applications and employment records as required by Section 709(c) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-8(c), and 29 C.F.R. § 1602.14. Further, Cintas will retain, throughout the term of this Consent Decree, all applications for the position of SSR submitted to its Rental Division facilities in the state of Michigan, and will continue to maintain applicant data and records pertaining
4

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45739 Page 8 of 31
to the position of SSR. Cintas will maintain these applications and applicant data and records in an electronic format that can be produced in an Excel spreadsheet at any time upon reasonable notice during the term of the Consent Decree. PART TWO: POSTING, TRAINING, RECRUITMENT, AND
HIRING PROCESS Section 201: Posting
Cintas will post the Employee Notice attached to this Decree as Appendix A in conspicuous locations visible to applicants and employees at each of its Rental Division facilities in the state of Michigan, where notices to employees and applicants are customarily posted. Said Notices shall remain posted throughout the term of this Decree. Cintas will promptly replace any Notice upon discovery that it has become defaced or in any way unreadable.
5

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45740 Page 9 of 31
Section 202: Diversity, harassment, and anti-discrimination training
Cintas will continue to offer and provide diversity, harassment, and anti-discrimination training. The training will, at a minimum, be conducted on an annual basis and made available to all SSRs. Section 203: Hiring training
Within 180 days of the entry of this Consent Decree, Cintas shall provide training to individuals involved in the selection of SSRs at Cintas’s Rental Division facilities in the state of Michigan. This training will cover record retention and what constitutes an unlawful employment practice under Title VII, including sex discrimination in hiring. Prior to the signing of this Consent Decree, Cintas has provided a copy of the material to be used at this training, and the Commission has reviewed the material and has had an opportunity to provide reasonable input on the content of the training.
This training will be given to (i) managers and supervisors at all of Cintas’s Rental Division facilities in the state of Michigan who screen, hire, interview, or recommend for hire applicants for the
6

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45741 Page 10 of 31
SSR position and (ii) all human-resource employees with responsibility for any part of Cintas’s Rental Division facilities in the state of Michigan that employ SSRs. The training will also be given to any individual promoted or newly hired into a decisionmaking position. These individuals will be trained within thirty days of hire or promotion. For those individuals who are hired into a decision-making position within the first year of this Consent Decree, the training will be repeated once approximately a year after the first training given to those individuals. Only those who have completed this training may screen, interview, or be involved in the decision-making process for SSRs. Section 204: Recruitment
Cintas will continue to picture and feature females on its marketing and advertising materials pertaining to the SSR position.
Cintas will conduct outreach recruitment in an effort to attract qualified women for SSR openings.
7

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45742 Page 11 of 31
Even though this Consent Decree addresses the Rental Division facilities in Michigan, SSRs in Michigan will have access to SSR openings nationwide on Cintas’s electronic career website.
Cintas will continue to maintain a system that allows all Rental Division employees nationwide to preregister their interest in an SSR position so that they will be notified electronically when an opening occurs in the geographies for which they post. Section 205: Hiring Practice or Process
Within 90 days of the effective date of this Consent Decree, Cintas will hire an outside expert to revalidate (1) the criteria used to screen, interview, and select SSRs and (2) the interview guides used in the SSR hiring process. Cintas has provided the name of the outside expert to the Commission.
Within 90 days of receiving a final recommendation from the outside expert, all persons who screen, interview, or are otherwise involved in the decision-making process for SSRs will use the validated processes and interview guides.
8

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45743 Page 12 of 31
Section 206: Enforcement of Hiring Practice or Process Within 90 days of receiving a final recommendation from the
outside expert (Section 205), Cintas will notify decisionmakers of its intent to coach and discipline for failing to use the validated SSR hiring criteria and interview guides. PART THREE: MONETARY RELIEF FOR CLASS MEMBERS Section 301: Eligibility as Class Members
Women who applied to work at a Cintas rental facility in the state of Michigan but were not hired as a SSR from January 1, 1999, through March 31, 2005, are eligible for monetary relief under this Decree. Section 302: Amount of Back Pay and Interest
Cintas shall pay $1,500,000 in back pay to the class members. Cintas will not condition the receipt of individual relief on an agreement from any individual to (a) maintain as confidential the terms of this Decree or the facts or allegations underlying the litigation, (b) waive her statutory right to file a charge with any federal or state anti-discrimination agency, or (c) waive her right to
9

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45744 Page 13 of 31
apply for a position at Cintas. However, to receive payment under this Consent Decree, an individual must sign a release (Appendix B) and provide all information requested by the Claims Administrator. Section 303: Determination of Individuals Who Will Get Relief
The individuals who will receive monetary relief are those listed on the Commission’s Submission of April 23, 2015 (ECF No. 1132), except for those individuals who are male. The EEOC will determine the amount that the individuals receive, except that the EEOC agrees that it will not set an amount for any individual less than $100.00. The Commission’s determinations may be subject to review at a fairness hearing conducted by the Court. Cintas will not challenge the Commission’s determinations made in compliance with this Consent Decree. PART FOUR: CLAIMS PROCESS AND FAIRNESS HEARING Section 401: Claims Administrator
The EEOC will retain the services of a third-party claims administrator (“Claims Administrator”). Cintas will pay up to
10

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45745 Page 14 of 31
$50,000 for the services and costs of the Claims Administrator. The Claims Administrator will request from each class member, and provide said information to Cintas, all information necessary for Cintas to determine the amount of appropriate monetary withholding for federal income tax, Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA), and any other required tax. Section 402: Notice of Proposed Distribution
Within ninety days of entry of the Decree, the EEOC will file with the Court a proposed distribution, itemizing the amount of monetary relief for each class member. The Court will then issue a Notice of Proposed Distribution (Appendix C). At the direction of the Commission, the Claims Administrator (Section 401) will send, via U.S. mail, a copy of that Notice and a Release (Appendix B) to each class member at her last known address along with a brief explanation stating how the amount for that individual was calculated. If any notices are returned as undeliverable, the Claims Administrator will attempt to find a more current address for those
11

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45746 Page 15 of 31
individuals. If a more current address is found, the Claims Administrator will re-mail the Notice to the more current address. Section 403: Class Members Eligible for Relief
Any individual for whom the Claims Administrator or EEOC is unable to find a current address will not be eligible for relief under this Consent Decree. Section 404: Letters of Disagreement
Individuals may submit to the Court letters indicating any disagreement with the proposed distribution, including any disagreement they may have with not being listed among the individuals who will receive an award or as to the size of any payment.
This procedure will be the sole means by which individuals may challenge the proposed distribution under this Consent Decree, but this limitation does not prevent an individual from retaining counsel, at her own expense, to represent her in this matter.
12

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45747 Page 16 of 31
Section 405: Fairness Hearing If no letters of disagreement (Section 404) have been submitted
to the Court within 60 days of the last mailing of the notice of proposed distribution (Section 402), the Court will issue a final order of distribution.
If a letter of disagreement has been submitted to the Court within 60 days of the last mailing of the notice of proposed distribution, then the Court will schedule a fairness hearing. The Court will serve notice of the fairness hearing on the parties and any individuals who have submitted a letter of disagreement to the Court. At the fairness hearing, individuals who have submitted letter objections will have an opportunity to be heard. After presiding over the fairness hearing, the Court will render any appropriate rulings, including a final order of distribution. Section 406: Payments to Class Members
After the EEOC or Claims Administrator receives a signed Release for an individual, the Claims Administrator will pay the class member in accordance with the Court’s final order of
13

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45748 Page 17 of 31
distribution (Section 405). Neither Cintas nor the Claims Administrator will deduct from any payment the employer’s share of any costs, taxes, or Social Security required by law to be paid by the company. Cintas or the Claims Administrator will prepare and furnish appropriate tax forms to the class members. After an individual receives payment, the EEOC or Claims Administrator will provide the original of that person’s signed Release to Cintas. PART FIVE: CONTINGENCY FOR REMAINING FUNDS
If for whatever reason any part of the monetary amount of $1,500,000 is unable to be paid as designated above, the remainder shall be split evenly among the class members who receive an award under this Decree. The Claims Administrator shall make such payments no later than sixty days after payment pursuant to the Court’s final order on distribution.
If any funds remain after the contingency in the preceding paragraph, the remainder shall be donated to Dress for Success.
14

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45749 Page 18 of 31
PART SIX: REPORTING REQUIREMENTS Section 601: Procedure
All reports shall be sent to the attention of Laurie A. Young or her successor, Regional Attorney, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900, Indianapolis IN 46204-4239. Section 602: Initial Report
Cintas will submit a report to the EEOC detailing compliance with this Decree within 180 days of the date of the Decree. Cintas will certify to the EEOC’s Regional Attorney that it has complied with Sections 201 through 205 of this Decree and will provide the Commission with a current copy of its diversity, harassment, and anti-discrimination training materials. Section 603: Annual Reports
Cintas shall submit two annual reports to the EEOC, the first due by December 15, 2016, the second by December 15, 2017. In each report, Cintas shall include the following information for the previous 12-month period:
15

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45750 Page 19 of 31
(i) the date range and topics of all training programs offered pursuant to Sections 202 and 203; (ii) a copy of all written materials used at those training programs; (iii) the name and position of each employee who attended those training programs; (iv) a description of, and explanation for, any changes made to the SSR hiring process at the corporate level; (v) good faith effort recruiting logs; (vi) a copy of any unprivileged material from any audits made of a facility’s SSR hiring or recruiting methods or practices should an audit be done; (vii) an Excel spreadsheet containing applicant data and records which includes for each individual who applied to be an SSR at a Rental Division facility in the state of Michigan, the name, sex (if provided), location number where the individual applied, date of application, and decision made regarding the
16

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45751 Page 20 of 31
application (including at what point in the process the individual was excluded, if that is the case); (viii) a copy of any unprivileged reports on SSR hiring provided to Cintas’s human relations, diversity committee, or upper management, should any reports be created; (ix) the expert’s revalidation findings and report pursuant to Section 205; and (x) a copy of the notice sent to decisionmakers in compliance with Section 206. PART SEVEN: ADMINISTRATION OF THE DECREE Section 701: Role of EEOC The EEOC may review compliance with this Decree. As part of such review, the EEOC may request, examine, and copy documents upon reasonable notice. Section 702: EEOC Monitoring In the event that the EEOC alleges that a violation of this Decree has occurred, EEOC shall give notice to Cintas in writing
17

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45752 Page 21 of 31
specifically identifying the alleged violation. Cintas will have sixty days in which to investigate and respond to the allegation. Section 703: Court Enforcement
If the parties are unable to resolve a dispute pursuant to Section 702, Cintas or the EEOC may petition the Court to order compliance. If the Court finds that Cintas or the EEOC has failed to comply with a provision of the Consent Decree, the Court may order appropriate relief. Section 704: Successor Liability
The terms of this Decree shall be binding upon the present and future successors and assigns of Cintas. If Cintas is sold, or one of its Rental Division facilities in the state of Michigan subject to this Decree is sold in whole or part, Cintas will provide sufficiently in advance of the sale to effect meaningful notice (a) to the buyer, notice of this Decree along with a copy of the Decree and (b) to the EEOC, notice of the sale.
18

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45753 Page 22 of 31
PART EIGHT: COSTS Except as provided in Section 703, the Commission and Cintas
will bear their own costs and attorney fees. PART NINE: RETENTION OF JURISDICTION Section 901: Term of the Decree
The term of this Consent Decree shall extend until the later of twenty-eight months following the date of entry of the Decree or March 15, 2018. Section 902: Retention of Jurisdiction and Enforcement of
Decree (a) The Court will retain jurisdiction of this cause for purposes of monitoring compliance with the Consent Decree and entry of such further orders or modifications as may be necessary or appropriate, through and including 90 days following the end of the term of the Consent Decree (Section 901). (b) There is no private right of action to enforce Cintas’s duties and obligations under the Decree; only the EEOC or its successors or assigns may enforce compliance herewith.
19

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45754 Page 23 of 31
PART TEN: OTHER PROVISIONS Section 1001: Complete Financial Obligations
This Decree constitutes the complete agreement between the EEOC and Cintas regarding the financial obligations imposed on Cintas and the complete release and settlement of EEOC’s claims arising from Charge No. 230A00845 and Civil Action No. 2:04-cv40132. Section 1002: Severability
If one or more provisions of this Decree are rendered unlawful or unenforceable by an act of Congress or by a decision of the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals or the United States Supreme Court, the Parties shall attempt to agree upon what, if any, amendments to this Decree to propose to the Court (Section 1003) to effectuate the purposes of this Decree. In any event, the unaffected provisions will remain enforceable to the maximum extent permitted by law. Section 1003: Amendment
This Decree may not be amended or modified except upon written agreement of the Parties and approval of the Court. Any
20

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45755 Page 24 of 31
proposed amendment to this Decree must be signed by a duly authorized representative of each Party. Such amendment must then be presented to the Court by joint motion of the Parties. Section 1004: Computation of Time Periods
In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by this Decree, unless otherwise stated, such computation shall be made consistent with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. SO ORDERED.

Dated:

HONORABLE SEAN F. COX UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45756 Page 25 of 31

EMPLOYEE NOTICE

This Notice is being distributed and posted pursuant to a Consent Decree entered by the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan in a
case between Cintas Corporation and the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Civil Action No. 2:04-cv-40132. In that case, the
EEOC alleged that Cintas unlawfully refused to recruit and hire females as Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives throughout the State of
Michigan because of their sex.

Federal law prohibits discrimination against any employee, former employee, or job applicant because of the individual’s sex, race, color,
religion, national origin, disability, age (over 40), or genetic information.

Federal law also prohibits retaliation of any kind against any person who has opposed any practice made unlawful under federal law or because an
individual has filed a charge, testified, assisted, or participated in any manner in an investigation, proceeding, or hearing.

Cintas supports and will comply with federal law in all respects and will not
take any actions against employees because they have exercised their rights under the law. Cintas will not discriminate against women in hiring SSRs,
will conduct a training program on Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and will not retaliate against an individual who opposes discrimination or
files a charge of discrimination.

If you have any complaint of discrimination, you may contact Cintas through its 24 hour hotline at 1-888-<>. You may also contact the EEOC at the
address or telephone number given below. An employee has the right, and is encouraged to exercise that right, to report allegations of employment
discrimination in the workplace. An employee may contact the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for the purpose of filing a charge of
employment discrimination.

Questions concerning this notice may be addressed to:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865

101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900

Detroit, Michigan 48226

Indianapolis, Indiana 46204-4239

Telephone (800) 669-4000

TTY (800) 669-6820

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45757 Page 26 of 31
APPENDIX A
2

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45758 Page 27 of 31
Release
In consideration for $________ paid to me in connection with the resolution of EEOC v. Cintas Corporation, I waive my right to recover under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for any claim of sex discrimination for failing to hire me as a service sales representative that I had against Cintas Corporation prior to the date of this release and that was included in the claims alleged in the EEOC’s complaint in EEOC v. Cintas Corporation, 2:04-cv40132.

Date: __________

Signature: ________________________

APPENDIX B

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45759 Page 28 of 31

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, v. CINTAS CORPORATION,
Defendant.

) Civil Case No. 04-40132
) ) Hon. Sean F. Cox
) ) Magistrate Judge R.
) Steven Whalen )
) )
) )

NOTICE OF PROPOSED DISTRIBUTION The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) has alleged in its Second Amended Complaint in this case that it was seeking to correct alleged unlawful employment practices on the basis of sex. Specifically, the EEOC alleged that Cintas Corporation (“Cintas”) unlawfully discriminated against females in recruiting and hiring Route Sales Drivers/Service Sales Representatives throughout the state of Michigan from June 1, 1999, through March 31, 2005. The EEOC and Cintas moved that
APPENDIX C – Page 1

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45760 Page 29 of 31
the Court enter a consent decree to resolve the Commission’s claims against Cintas. The Court entered its Consent Decree on <date>. Among other things, the Consent Decree provides for (i) monetary relief to a class of females who were not hired as service sales representatives from January 1, 1999, through March 31, 2005, and (ii) equitable and injunctive relief against Cintas that is designed to correct any alleged past sex discrimination and prevent future sex discrimination.
Pursuant to Sections 301 and 303 of the Consent Decree, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has compiled a list of class members, itemizing the amount of monetary relief for each individual. The Court now ORDERS that the list of class members, this Notice of Proposed Distribution, and an explanation as to how the individual’s amount was calculated, be served on each class member for whom the EEOC has a current address.
If any individual class member has an objection to the proposed distribution of funds, that class member shall send to the Court, within 30 days of this Notice, her objection, specifically explaining the objection and the grounds for it.
2

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45761 Page 30 of 31
Any objection shall include the Civil Action Number for this case
(2:04-cv-40132) and be sent to the following address:
Clerk for the United States District Court Theodore Levin U.S. Courthouse 231 W. Lafayette Blvd, Room 564 Detroit MI 48226
Those class members who have no objection to the proposed
distribution should NOT send anything to the Court.
In order to receive any money in this case, an individual
will have to sign a release in substantially the same form as
the example enclosed.
Any individual may direct questions to the EEOC at the
following address or telephone number:
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 101 West Ohio Street, Suite 1900 Indianapolis IN 46204-4239 (317) 226-7226 (800) 407-1490 email: eeoclitigation@eeoc.gov
Individuals are cautioned, however, that the only way to preserve a
disagreement with the proposed distribution is to submit a letter to
the Court as set forth above.
3

Case 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW ECF No. 1178 filed 12/21/17 PageID.45762 Page 31 of 31

SO ORDERED. Dated: December 21, 2017

s/Sean F. Cox HONORABLE SEAN F. COX
U. S. DISTRICT JUDGE

4

 
 Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 1 of 132
CLOSED,APPEAL,CONSOL,REOPENED,reassigned
U.S. District Court Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW

Serrano v. Cintas Corporation Assigned to: District Judge Sean F. Cox Referred to: Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen Demand: $75,000 Case in other court: U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit,
08−02435/09−01674
U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit, 09−01674
U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit, 10−01662
U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit, 10−02629/11−02057
U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit, 11−02057 Cause: No cause code entered
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 05/10/2004 Date Terminated: 03/10/2017 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Mirna E. Serrano

represented by Bill Lann Lee Lewis, Feinberg, 1330 Broadway Suite 1800 Oakland, CA 94612 510−839−6824 Fax: 510−839−7839 Email: blee@lewisfeinberg.com TERMINATED: 12/21/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Gena E. Wiltsek Children's Rights 330 Seventh Avenue 4th Floor New York, NY 10001 212−683−2210 TERMINATED: 03/26/2007 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

James K. Fett Fett & Fields 805 E. Main Street Pinckney, MI 48169−3266 734−954−0100 Email: jim@fettlaw.com TERMINATED: 06/11/2015 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Lawrence A. Fields Fett & Fields 805 E. Main Street Pinckney, MI 48169−3266 734−954−0100 Email: attys@fettlaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 2 of 132
Nicholas Roumel 101 N. Main St. Suite 555 Ann Arbor, MI 48104 734−663−7550 Fax: 734−663−7592 Email: nroumel@nachtlaw.com TERMINATED: 06/27/2005 LEAD ATTORNEY
Rachel J. Geman Lieff, Cabraser, Heimann & Bernstein, LLP 250 Hudson Street 8th Floor New York, NY 10013−1413 212−355−9500 Fax: 212−355−9592 Email: rgeman@lchb.com TERMINATED: 12/21/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
William G. Tishkoff Tishkoff & Assoc. 407 N. Main Second Floor Ann Arbor, MI 48104 734−663−4077 Email: will@tishkofflaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
A. Poppy Goudsmit Foster, Meadows, 607 Shelby Street Seventh Floor Detroit, MI 48226 313−961−3234 Email: pgoudsmit@fostermeadows.com TERMINATED: 12/05/2007
Heather Mills Goldstein, Demchak, 300 Lakeside Drive Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 510−763−9800 Fax: 510−835−1417 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jennifer L. Brant Tishkoff & Assoc. 407 N. Main Second Floor Ann Arbor, MI 48104 734−663−4077 Fax: 734−665−1613 Email: jennifer@tishkofflaw.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Paul Strauss 5525 S. Woodlawn Ave. Chicago, IL 60637

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 3 of 132

773−551−5350 TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Richard Talbot Seymour Richard T. Seymour Assoc. 1150 Connecticut Ave., NW Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036−4129 202−862−4320 Fax: 800−805−1065 Email: rick@rickseymourlaw.net ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sarah E. Siskind Miner, Barnhill, 44 E. Mifflin Street Suite 803 Madison, WI 53703 608−255−5200 Fax: 608−255−5380 Email: ssiskind@lawmbg.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sierra R. Koch Tishkoff & Assoc. 407 N. Main Second Floor Ann Arbor, MI 48104 734−663−4077 TERMINATED: 06/23/2009

Plaintiff
Stephanie L. McVay TERMINATED: 02/09/2010

represented by Gena E. Wiltsek (See above for address) TERMINATED: 03/26/2007 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Rachel J. Geman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/21/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

William G. Tishkoff (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

A. Poppy Goudsmit (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/05/2007

Bill Lann Lee (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/21/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

James K. Fett (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/11/2015 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 4 of 132

Jennifer L. Brant (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Paul Strauss (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Richard Talbot Seymour (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sierra R. Koch (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/23/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Linda D. Allen TERMINATED: 01/21/2010

represented by Gena E. Wiltsek (See above for address) TERMINATED: 03/26/2007 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Rachel J. Geman (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/21/2009 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

William G. Tishkoff (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

A. Poppy Goudsmit (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/05/2007

Bill Lann Lee (See above for address) TERMINATED: 12/21/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

James K. Fett (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/11/2015 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jennifer L. Brant (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Paul Strauss (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Richard Talbot Seymour (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sierra R. Koch

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 5 of 132

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/23/2009 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Osbaldo Mundo TERMINATED: 10/21/2009

represented by Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner Miner, Barnhill & Galland 14 W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 60610 312−751−1170 Fax: (312) 751−0438 Email: jminer@lawmbg.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Edward Fitch

represented by Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Dimitri Mack TERMINATED: 10/21/2009

represented by Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Sharon Rose Wilborn TERMINATED: 10/21/2009

represented by Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Rachel J. Geman (See above for address)

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff Jose Picorelli

represented by

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 6 of 132

Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Bennita Shiffer TERMINATED: 10/21/2009

represented by Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Rachel J. Geman (See above for address)

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Aundre Graham TERMINATED: 10/21/2009

represented by Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff
Tanesha Davis TERMINATED: 05/24/2010

represented by Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Roberta L. Steele Goldstein, Demchak, 300 Lakeside Drive Suite 1000 Oakland, CA 94612 510−763−9800 Fax: 510−835−1417 Email: rsteele@gdblegal.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Plaintiff

represented by

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 7 of 132

Cindy Patterson TERMINATED: 10/21/2009

Bill Lann Lee (See above for address)

Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Consol Plaintiff
Blanca Nelly Avalos Consolidated Plaintiff, Civil Action 06−12311 TERMINATED: 06/19/2008

represented by Heather Mills (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Nancy L. Maldonado Miner, Barnhill, 14 W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 60610 312−751−1170 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Roberta L. Steele (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Scott A. Entin Miner, Barnhill, 14 W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 60610 312−751−1170 Fax: 312.751.0438 Email: sentin@lawmbg.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Sharon K. Legenza Miner, Barnhill, 14 W. Erie Street Chicago, IL 60610 312−751−1170 Fax: 312−751−0438 TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Paul Strauss (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Rachel J. Geman (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 8 of 132

Consol Plaintiff
Anthony Jones Consolidated Plaintiff, Civil Action 06−12311 TERMINATED: 10/07/2008

represented by Nancy L. Maldonado (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Scott A. Entin (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Sharon K. Legenza (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Judson H. Miner (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Paul Strauss (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Sarah E. Siskind (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Intervenor Plaintiff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by Erica D. White−Dunston Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1801 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20507 202−663−4768 TERMINATED: 02/15/2013 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Kenneth J. Kryvoruka Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1801 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20507 202−663−4826 TERMINATED: 02/15/2013 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Robert D. Unitas Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1801 L Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20507 202−663−4768 TERMINATED: 02/15/2013 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 9 of 132
Aarika D. Mack−Brown Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 101 W. Ohio Street Suite 1900 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317−226−7848 Fax: 317−226−5571 Email: aarika.mack−brown@eeoc.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jo Ann Farnsworth Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 101 W. Ohio Street Suite 1900 Indianapolis, IN 46204−4203 317−226−7949 Email: joann.farnsworth@eeoc.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jonathan Bryant Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Indianapolis District Office 101 West Ohio Street Suite 1900 Indianapolis, IN 46204 317−226−5588 Fax: 317−226−5571 Email: jonathan.bryant@eeoc.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Kenneth L. Bird Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 101 W. Ohio Street Suite 1900 Indianapolis, IN 46204−4203 317−226−7212 Fax: 317−226−5571 Email: Kenneth.Bird@EEOC.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Lauren G. Burstein Social Security Adminstration Office of Disability Adjudication and Review 477 Michigan Ave Room 900 Detroit, MI 48226 888−748−7696 ex. 21052 Fax: 313−226−3625 Email: lauren.burstein@ssa.gov TERMINATED: 07/06/2015 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Miles Shultz U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 West Madison Street Suite 2000 Chicago, IL 60661 3128698053 Email: miles.shultz@eeoc.gov

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 10 of 132 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Defendant
Cintas Corporation an Ohio corporation

represented by Elena R. Baca Paul, Hastings LLP 515 S. Flower Street 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071−2228 213−683−6000 Email: elenabaca@paulhastings.com TERMINATED: 04/28/2010 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gregory M. Utter Keating, Muething, One East Fourth Street Suite 1400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 513−579−6540 Fax: 513−579−6457 Email: gmutter@kmklaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Heather A. Morgan Grube Brown & Geidt LLP 633 West 5th Street Suite 3330 Los Angeles, CA 90071 213−358−2810 Fax: 213−995−6382 Email: heathermorgan@gbgllp.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jon A. Geier Paul Hastings LLP 875 15th Street NW Washington, DC 20005 202−508−9500 Fax: 202−508−9700 Email: jongeier@paulhastings.com TERMINATED: 04/28/2010 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Maureen E. O'Neill Paul, Hastings, 600 Peachtree Street Suite 2400 Atlanta, GA 30308−2259 404−815−2400 Email: maureenoneill@paulhastings.com TERMINATED: 04/28/2010 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Nancy L. Abell Paul Hastings LLP 515 S. Flower Street 25th Floor

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 11 of 132
Los Angeles, CA 90071−2228 213−683−6000 Fax: 213−627−0705 Email: nancyabell@paulhastings.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Benjamin G. Stewart Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL 1 E. 4th Street Suite 1400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 513−579−6400 Fax: 513−579−6457 Email: bgstewart@kmklaw.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Christy Marie Nageleisen−Blades Cintas Corporation 6800 Cintas Blvd Mason, OH 45040 513−573−4803 Fax: 855−806−4207 Email: nageleisenc@cintas.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Rachael A. Rowe Keating, Muething, One East Fourth Street Suite 1400 Cincinnati, OH 45202 513−579−6486 Email: rrowe@kmklaw.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Theodore R. Opperwall Kienbaum Hardy Viviano Pelton & Forrest, P.L.C. 280 N. Old Woodward Avenue Suite 400 Birmingham, MI 48009−6255 248−645−0000 Fax: 248−645−1385 Email: topperwall@kohp.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Defendant
Lantangia Winston

V.
Movant
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission TERMINATED: 07/10/2006

represented by Kenneth L. Bird (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Laurie Young Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 101 W. Ohio Street Suite 1900 Indianapolis, IN 46204−4203

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 12 of 132

317−226−7212 Fax: 317−226−5571 Email: laurie.young@eeoc.gov TERMINATED: 01/26/2016 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michelle Eisele Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 101 W. Ohio Street Suite 1900 Indianapolis, IN 46204−4203 317−226−7212 Fax: 317−226−5571 Email: michelle.eisele@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Robert K. Dawkins Equal Employment Opportunities Commission 477 Michigan Avenue Suite 865 Detroit, MI 48226 313−226−4600 Fax: 313−226−2778 Email: robert.dawkins@eeoc.gov TERMINATED: 05/03/2006 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Omar Weaver Equal Employment Opportunities Commission 477 Michigan Avenue Suite 865 Detroit, MI 48226 313−226−3407 Fax: 313−226−6584 Email: omar.weaver@eeoc.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant Colleen Grindle

represented by Paul Strauss (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant Ruthie Richardson

represented by Paul Strauss (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant Dawn Stevenson

represented by Paul Strauss (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/15/2008 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Movant

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 13 of 132

Bernadette Lockhart

Movant Donna Southall

represented by Donna Southall 20255 Birwood St. Detroit, MI 48221 PRO SE

Movant Dianne Jean Kredell

represented by Dianne Jean Kredell 6252 Rynn Rd. Clyde Twp., MI 48049 PRO SE

Movant Elizabeth Gillete

represented by Elizabeth Gillete 259 Lamoreaux Dr. N.W. Comstock Park, MI 49321 PRO SE

Movant Gina Parke

represented by Gina Parke 24575 Beck Ave. Eastpointe, MI 48021 PRO SE

Movant Deborah Agnew

represented by Deborah Agnew 26445 Woodland Dr. Chesterfield, MI 48051 PRO SE

Movant Nadine Todd

represented by Nadine Todd 37434 Fountain Park Circle #20B 364 Westland, MI 48185 PRO SE

Movant Scherrie Davis Postiglione

represented by Scherrie Davis Postiglione 3615 W. 213th Place Matteson, IL 60443 PRO SE

Movant Angela K. Redmond−Elliott

represented by Angela K. Redmond−Elliott 654 37th Ave. North Saint Petersburg, FL 33704 PRO SE

Movant Ilene C Lesniak

represented by Ilene C Lesniak P.O. Box 1682 Warren, MI 48090 PRO SE

ThirdParty Plaintiff

represented by

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 14 of 132

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission TERMINATED: 07/10/2006

Jo Ann Farnsworth (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Kenneth L. Bird (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Laurie Young (See above for address) TERMINATED: 01/26/2016 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Michelle Eisele (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
ThirdParty Defendant
Cintas Corporation an Ohio corporation TERMINATED: 07/10/2006

represented by Gregory M. Utter (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Christy Marie Nageleisen−Blades (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 05/10/2004 08/30/2004 09/14/2004
09/14/2004 09/14/2004 09/15/2004
09/17/2004 09/27/2004 10/13/2004

# Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT filed by Mirna E. Serrano against Cintas Corporation, Receipt No. 5023AA.(PMil, ) (Entered: 05/11/2004)
2 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Cintas Corporation served on 8/25/2004, answer due 9/14/2004. (DWor, ) (Entered: 09/03/2004)
3 AMENDED COMPLAINT First Amended Complaint And Jury Demand filed by Mirna E. Serrano against Cintas Corporation.(Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 09/14/2004)
4 NOTICE of Appearance by Theodore R. Opperwall on behalf of Cintas Corporation. (Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 09/14/2004)
5 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Cintas Corporation.(Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 09/14/2004)
6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano re 3 Amended Complaint Proof of service of First Amended Complaint And Jury Demand. (Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 09/15/2004)
7 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Scheduling Conference set for 10/20/2004 02:00 PM before Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RCho, ) (Entered: 09/17/2004)
8 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Cintas Corporation.(Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 09/27/2004)
9 DISCOVERY plan jointly filed pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(f).(Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 10/13/2004)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 15 of 132

10/18/2004
10/27/2004 11/02/2004
11/08/2004 11/12/2004 11/17/2004
11/23/2004
11/24/2004 11/29/2004
12/02/2004 12/14/2004 01/04/2005 04/12/2005 04/13/2005 04/15/2005 04/15/2005
04/15/2005 04/21/2005

10 SCHEDULING ORDER: Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/23/2006 02:00 PM before Honorable Paul V Gadola. Jury Trial set for 3/6/2006 09:00 AM before Honorable Paul V Gadola. Dispositive Motion Cut−off set for 10/15/2005. Discovery due by 10/3/2005. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (Refer to image for additional dates)(RCho, ) (Entered: 10/18/2004)
11 MOTION of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues by Cintas Corporation. (Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 10/27/2004)
12 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 11 MOTION of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RCho, ) (Entered: 11/03/2004)
13 NOTICE of hearing on 11 MOTION of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues. Motion Hearing set for 12/14/2004 02:00 PM before Honorable Paul V Gadola. (VSim, ) (Entered: 11/09/2004)
14 STIPULATION to Extend Filing Response to Motion to Limit by Mirna E. Serrano.(Fett, James) (Entered: 11/12/2004)
15 RESPONSE to 11 MOTION of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Limit Discovery To Class Certification filed by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G)(Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 11/17/2004)
17 STIPULATION AND ORDER re 11 MOTION of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues. Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings as to 11 MOTION of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues: Responses due by 11/17/2004. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (THal, ) (Entered: 11/29/2004)
16 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: A. Poppy Goudsmit appearing on behalf of all plaintiffs.(Goudsmit, A.) (Entered: 11/24/2004)
18 REPLY to Response re 11 MOTION of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3)(Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 11/29/2004)
19 NOTICE of Firm Name Change by counsel for plaintiffs (THal, ) (Entered: 12/06/2004)
20 STIPULATION to Limit Discovery by Linda D. Allen, Cintas Corporation, Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano.(Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 12/14/2004)
21 ORDER withdrawing 11 Motion to Limit Discovery to Class Certification Issues− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (PMil, ) (Entered: 01/05/2005)
22 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A − Letter to Utter# 3 Exhibit B − Proposed Order)(Fett, James) (Entered: 04/12/2005)
23 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 22 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (JDel, ) (Entered: 04/14/2005)
24 WITNESS LIST by Mirna E. Serrano (Fett, James) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
25 MOTION for Protective Order Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A − Stipulated Confidentiality Agreement and Agreed Protective Order# 3 Affidavit of David Armbrester)(Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
26 WITNESS LIST by Cintas Corporation (Opperwall, Theodore) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
27 NOTICE of hearing on 22 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 5/6/2005. Motion Hearing set for 5/10/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Paul V Gadola. (MLan, ) (Entered: 04/21/2005)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 16 of 132

04/26/2005 04/29/2005 04/29/2005 05/03/2005 05/13/2005
05/16/2005 05/23/2005 05/24/2005 05/25/2005 05/26/2005
05/26/2005 06/02/2005 06/08/2005 06/09/2005 06/10/2005

28 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT and ORDER granting 25 Motion for Protective Order.− Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (PMil, ) (Entered: 04/27/2005)
29 RESPONSE to 22 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A−I)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/29/2005)
30 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A−D)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/29/2005)
31 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 30 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RCho, ) (Entered: 05/03/2005)
32 NOTICE of hearing on 30 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests, 22 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 5/24/2005. Motion Hearing set for 5/26/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 05/13/2005)
33 RESPONSE to 30 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests Plaintiffs' Opposition To Defendant's Motion To Compel Answers To Discovery Requests filed by all plaintiffs. (Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 05/16/2005)
34 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of withdrawal of Motion to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/23/2005)
35 STATEMENT of Resolved and Unresolved Issues by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 3# 4 Exhibit 4)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/24/2005)
36 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard Talbot Seymour on behalf of all plaintiffs. (Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 05/25/2005)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 5/26/2005 re 22 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay,, Linda D. Allen, before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Hearing continued to 7/7/05 at 2:00 p.m. (Tape #DAS 05−054) (MLan, ) (Entered: 05/26/2005)
37 Notice of E−mail Delivery Failure as to attorney *Gena E. Wiltsek* Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (LBeh) (Entered: 05/26/2005)
38 MOTION for Protective Order by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Protective Order# 2 Proposed Order)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/02/2005)
39 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 38 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (Del, J) (Entered: 06/08/2005)
40 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Change of Address and Firm for Richard T. Seymour (Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 06/09/2005)
41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit Att. A − Proposed Second Amended Complaint# 3 Exhibit Att. B − Plaintiffs' FOIA Request to EEOC# 4 Exhibit Att. C − WilliamTishkoff letter to EEOC and Receipt stamp# 5 Exhibit Att. D − Cintas's Letter of Transmittal of Documents Produced# 6 Exhibit Att. E − Declaration of Richard T. Seymour# 7 Exhibit Att. F − EEOC Reasonable Cause Determination# 8 Exhibit Att. G − Third Amended Complaint in Ramirez v. Cintas (N.D. Calif.)# 9 Exhibit Att. H − Contas's Answer to Third Amended Complaint in Ramirez v. Cintas (N.D. Calif.)# 10 Exhibit Att. I − EEOC Case Log Excerpt# 11 Exhibit Att. J − EEOC Basic Charge Information Sheet Excerpt# 12 Exhibit Att. K − EEOC Intake Questionnaire# 13 Exhibit Att. L − EEOC Charge of Plaintiff Serrano# 14 Exhibit Att. M − June 1, 2000 Letter from EEOC to Cintas# 15 Exhibit Att. N − August 1, 2000 Letter from EEOC to Cintas# 16 Exhibit Att. O − Cintas's Petition to EEOC to Revoke or Modify Subpoena# 17 Exhibit Att. P − EEOC Determination on Cintas's Petition# 18 Exhibit Att. Q − Appendix of Unreported Decisions# 19 Exhibit Att. R − Copy of Decision −

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 17 of 132

06/14/2005 06/15/2005 06/16/2005 06/20/2005
06/23/2005 06/27/2005 06/27/2005
06/27/2005 06/27/2005 06/27/2005 06/27/2005 06/28/2005

EEOC v Avco New Idea Div. (N.D. Ohio 1978)# 20 Exhibit Att. S − Copy of Decision − Kent−Chojnicki v. Runyon (W.D. N.Y. 1998)# 21 Exhibit Att. T − Copy of Decision − Karpowicz v. General Motors Corp. (N.D. Ill. 1997))(Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 06/10/2005)
42 EXHIBIT 17: Corrected Attachment P, EEOC Determination on Cintas's Petition to Revoke or Modify Subpoena re 41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by all plaintiffs. (Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 06/14/2005)
43 NOTICE of hearing on 38 MOTION for Protective Order. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 7/5/2005. Motion Hearing set for 7/7/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 06/15/2005)
44 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen,. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (THal, ) (Entered: 06/17/2005)
45 RESPONSE to 38 MOTION for Protective Order on Pre−Certification Communications with Class Members filed by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Attachments# 2 Exhibit Attachment A − May 26, 2005 Proposed but Unfiled Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery# 3 Exhibit Attachment B − Plaintiffs Draft Letter Initiating Contact with Class Members)(Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 06/20/2005)
46 NOTICE of hearing on 41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 7/5/2005. Motion Hearing set for 7/7/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 06/23/2005)
47 RESPONSE to 41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Benedict v. Sky Chefs# 2 EEOC v. Prestolite)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/27/2005)
48 AFFIDAVIT of Robert W. Maxwell re 47 Response to Motion to File Second Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G# 8 Exhibit H# 9 Exhibit I# 10 Exhibit J# 11 Exhibit K# 12 Exhibit L# 13 Exhibit M)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/27/2005)
49 AFFIDAVIT of Allegra Rich re 47 Response to Motion to Filed Second Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/27/2005)
50 AFFIDAVIT of Gregory M. Utter re 47 Response to Motion for Leave to Filed Second Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/27/2005)
51 AFFIDAVIT of Michael Brigger re 47 Response to Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/27/2005)
52 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information by Mirna E. Serrano. (Roumel, Nicholas) (Entered: 06/27/2005)
53 MOTION to Amend/Correct 10 Scheduling Order, by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Attachments# 2 Exhibit Attachment A: Scheduling Order entered October 18, 2004# 3 Exhibit Attachment B: Defendant?s November 12, 2004, Initial Disclosures (in the form provided)# 4 Exhibit Attachment C: Plaintiffs? Interrogatories to Defendant Dated October 19, 2004# 5 Exhibit Attachment D: Plaintiffs? Request for Production of Documents Dated October 19, 2004# 6 Exhibit Attachment E: Cintas January 14, 2005, Letter of Transmittal of documents# 7 Exhibit Attachment F: Cintas April 13, 2005, Letter of Transmittal and Interrogatory Answers# 8 Exhibit Attachment G: Cintas April 20, 2005, Letter Transmitting Some Electronic Databases# 9 Exhibit Attachment H: Cintas April 27, 2005, Letter Transmitting Electronic Payroll Database# 10 Exhibit Attachment I: Cintas June 9, 2005, Letter Transmitting Last of Corrected Unredacted Electronic Databases# 11 Exhibit Attachment J: Declaration of Richard T. Seymour# 12 Exhibit Attachment K: Plaintiffs? June 14, 2005, Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) Depositions)(Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 06/28/2005)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 18 of 132

06/30/2005 06/30/2005 07/01/2005 07/05/2005 07/05/2005 07/05/2005
07/07/2005 07/07/2005
07/11/2005
07/11/2005 07/15/2005 08/08/2005 08/18/2005 08/18/2005 08/30/2005 08/30/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005

54 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 53 MOTION to Amend/Correct 10 Scheduling Order, filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (Del, J) (Entered: 06/30/2005)
55 REPLY to Response re 38 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/30/2005)
56 (STRICKEN)REPLY to Response re 41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by all plaintiffs. (Seymour, Richard) Modified on 8/18/2005 (RCho, ). Additional attachment(s) added on 8/18/2005 (RCho, ). (Entered: 07/01/2005)
57 MOTION to Strike 56 Reply to Response to Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/05/2005)
58 RESPONSE to 57 MOTION to Strike 56 Reply to Response to Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by all plaintiffs. (Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 07/05/2005)
59 MOTION Substitution of Five−Page Reply Broef for Over−Length Reply Brief re 56 Reply to Response to Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Substitute Five−Page Reply Brief ISO Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint)(Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 07/05/2005)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 7/7/2005 re 38 MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation, before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Denied (Tape #DAS 05−076) (MLan, ) (Entered: 07/08/2005)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 7/7/2005 re 41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Mirna E. Serrano,, Stephanie L. McVay,, Linda D. Allen,, 30 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests filed by Cintas Corporation, before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motions Taken Under Advisement (Tape #DAS 05−076) (MLan, ) (Entered: 07/08/2005)
60 NOTICE of hearing on 53 MOTION to Amend/Correct 10 Scheduling Order,. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 7/29/2005. Motion Hearing set for 8/2/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) Modified on 7/11/2005 (MLan, ). (Entered: 07/11/2005)
NOTICE of Correction re 53 MOTION to Amend/Correct 10 Scheduling Order, Hearing set for 8/2/05; Unresolved Issues list due 7/29/05 (MLan, ) (Entered: 07/11/2005)
61 RESPONSE to 53 MOTION to Amend/Correct 10 Scheduling Order, filed by Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/15/2005)
62 STIPULATED ORDER granting 53 Motion to Amend/Correct− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 08/08/2005)
63 ORDER granting 57 Motion to Strike, granting 59 Motion to Substitute− Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RCho, ) (Entered: 08/18/2005)
64 REPLY to Response re 41 MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint (Substitute Reply filed pursuant to Order of August 18, 2005) filed by all plaintiffs. (Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 08/18/2005)
65 NOTICE of Appearance by Rachel J. Geman on behalf of all plaintiffs. (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 08/30/2005)
66 NOTICE of Appearance by Gena E. Wiltsek on behalf of all plaintiffs. (Wiltsek, Gena) (Entered: 08/30/2005)
67 ORDER denying 38 Motion for Protective Order− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 09/06/2005)
68 ORDER denying 22 Motion to Compel− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 09/06/2005)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 19 of 132

09/06/2005 09/12/2005 09/19/2005 09/20/2005 09/20/2005 10/06/2005
10/07/2005 10/07/2005 10/14/2005 10/17/2005
10/18/2005 11/15/2005 11/15/2005 11/16/2005
11/16/2005
11/22/2005
12/02/2005

69 ORDER granting 41 Motion for Leave to File− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 09/06/2005)
70 AMENDED COMPLAINT Second Amended Complaint filed by all plaintiffs against Cintas Corporation.(Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 09/12/2005)
73 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 7/7/05 of Motion Hearing (THal, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2009: # 1 Main document, # 2 Document Continuation) (JCha). (Entered: 09/20/2005)
71 APPEAL OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION by Cintas Corporation re 69 Order on Motion for Leave to File. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/20/2005)
72 MOTION to Stay Answer Date Pending Resolution of Objections to Magistrate Judge Scheer's Order by Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/20/2005)
74 STIPULATION re 72 MOTION to Stay Answer Date Pending Resolution of Objections to Magistrate Judge Scheer's Order Extending for Thirty Days Plaintiffs' Time to Respond by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Cintas Corporation.(Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 10/06/2005)
75 MEMORANDUM in Response to Cintas Corporation's Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision by Mirna E. Serrano.(Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/07/2005)
76 DECLARATION by Rachel Geman in Support of Plaintiffs' Response to Cintas Corporation's Objections filed by Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit B to Declaration of Rachel Geman)(Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/07/2005)
77 ORDER re 74 Stipulation filed by Cintas Corporation, Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RCho, ) (Entered: 10/14/2005)
78 REPLY to Response re 72 MOTION to Stay Answer Date Pending Resolution of Objections to Magistrate Judge Scheer's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint filed by Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/17/2005)
79 REPLY to 75 Memorandum, 71 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision of 9/6/05 Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/18/2005)
80 MOTION to Intervene by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1)(Weaver, Omar) (Entered: 11/15/2005)
81 MOTION to Intervene by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A to Motion# 2 Exhibit A to Brief# 3 Exhibit B to Brief# 4 Exhibit C to Brief# 5 Exhibit D to Brief)(Weaver, Omar) (Entered: 11/15/2005)
82 NOTICE of hearing on (62 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 204 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel, (205 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 63 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel.Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 6/5/2007, Motion Hearing set for 6/7/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 11/16/2005)
83 Amended MOTION to Intervene by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Index# 2 Exhibit A − Motion# 3 Exhibit A − Brief# 4 Exhibit B − Brief# 5 Exhibit C − Brief# 6 Exhibit D − Brief)(Weaver, Omar) (Entered: 11/16/2005)
84 NOTICE of hearing on 81 MOTION to Intervene, 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 12/9/2005. Motion Hearing set for 12/13/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 11/22/2005)
85 [FILING ERROR RULE 9 AND LR5.1; NO 12 BLANK PAGE] RESPONSE to 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene, 81 MOTION to Intervene filed by Cintas

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 20 of 132

12/02/2005 12/02/2005 12/05/2005 12/05/2005 12/05/2005 12/05/2005 12/06/2005 12/08/2005
12/08/2005
12/09/2005 12/13/2005 12/13/2005
12/16/2005 12/22/2005 12/23/2005 01/17/2006 02/06/2006 02/15/2006

Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 12/5/2005 (BSoc, ). (Entered: 12/02/2005)
86 AFFIDAVIT of Jason M. Cohen re 85 Response to Motion to intervene by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 12/02/2005)
87 [FILING ERROR RULE 9 AND LR5.1] MOTION to Stay re 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene, 81 MOTION to Intervene by Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 12/5/2005 (BSoc, ). (Entered: 12/02/2005)
88 EXHIBIT Index re 86 Affidavit by Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 12/05/2005)
89 RESPONSE to 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene filed by all plaintiffs. (Wiltsek, Gena) (Entered: 12/05/2005)
90 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano of Plaintiffs Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff Intervenor EEOC's Corrected Motion to Intervene and Amended COmplaint−in−Intervention. (Wiltsek, Gena) (Entered: 12/05/2005)
91 RESPONSE to 87 MOTION to Stay re 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene, 81 MOTION to Intervene and Opposition to Defendant's Request to Postpone December 13, 2005, Hearing filed by all plaintiffs. (Seymour, Richard) (Entered: 12/05/2005)
92 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 87 MOTION to Stay re 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene, 81 MOTION to Intervene filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RCho, ) (Entered: 12/06/2005)
93 NOTICE of hearing on 87 MOTION to Stay re 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene, 81 MOTION to Intervene. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 12/12/2005. Motion Hearing set for 12/13/2005 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 12/08/2005)
94 [FILING ERROR − ATTORNEY NOT LISTED ON CASE, DOCUMENT UNSIGNED] RESPONSE to 87 MOTION to Stay re 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene, 81 MOTION to Intervene filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A)(Price, Dale) Modified on 12/9/2005 (KGeha, ). (Entered: 12/08/2005)
95 REPLY to Response re 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Weaver, Omar) (Entered: 12/09/2005)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 12/13/2005 re 83 , 81 MOTION to Intervene filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Granted (Tape #DAS 05−134) (MLan, ) (Entered: 12/14/2005)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 12/13/2005 re 87 MOTION to Stay re 83 Amended MOTION to Intervene, 81 MOTION to Intervene filed by Cintas Corporation, before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Denied (Tape #DAS 05−134) (MLan, ) (Entered: 12/14/2005)
96 NOTICE of Appearance by Robert K. Dawkins on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Dawkins, Robert) (Entered: 12/16/2005)
97 ORDER granting 81 , 83 Motion to Intervene, denying 87 Motion to Stay− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 12/22/2005)
98 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1)(Dawkins, Robert) (Entered: 12/23/2005)
99 ANSWER to Third Party Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation.(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 01/17/2006)
100 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation Amended Notice of Deposition of the EEOC Pursuant to Red.R.Civ.P. 30(b)(6) (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 02/06/2006)
101 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 21 of 132

02/15/2006 02/15/2006 02/17/2006 02/17/2006
02/21/2006
02/22/2006 02/22/2006 02/22/2006 02/22/2006 02/22/2006 02/22/2006 02/22/2006
02/22/2006 02/23/2006

Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G# 8 # 9 Exhibit I)(Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 02/15/2006)
102 MEMORANDUM re 101 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano.(Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 02/15/2006)
103 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 101 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RBri, ) (Entered: 02/15/2006)
104 ORDER., Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings as to 101 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas: Responses due by 2/22/2006. Motion Hearing set for 2/27/2006 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 02/17/2006)
105 [FILING ERROR:NO INDEX, EXHIBITS NOT PROPERLY LABELED] MOTION to Amend/Correct 62 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G# 8 Exhibit H# 9 Exhibit I# 10 Exhibit J# 11 Exhibit K# 12 Exhibit L# 13 Exhibit M# 14 Exhibit N)(Geman, Rachel) Modified on 2/21/2006 (DHame, ). (Entered: 02/17/2006)
106 MOTION to Compel With Memorandum Of Law And Certificate Of Service by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Index of Exhibits B# 3 Exhibit D# 4 Exhibit E# 5 Exhibit F# 6 Exhibit G# 7 Exhibit H# 8 Exhibit I# 9 Exhibit J# 10 Exhibit K# 11 Exhibit L)(Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 02/21/2006)
107 NOTICE of Appearance by Jennifer L. Brant on behalf of Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Brant, Jennifer) (Entered: 02/22/2006)
108 NOTICE of Appearance by Laurie Young on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Young, Laurie) (Entered: 02/22/2006)
109 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Eisele on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Eisele, Michelle) (Entered: 02/22/2006)
110 NOTICE of Appearance by Kenneth L. Bird on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/22/2006)
111 INDEX of Exhibits re 106 MOTION to Compel With Memorandum Of Law And Certificate Of Service by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano.(Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 02/22/2006)
112 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano re 111 Exhibit Index, 106 MOTION to Compel With Memorandum Of Law And Certificate Of Service Regarding Items Filed Under Seal. (Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 02/22/2006)
113 [FILING ERROR:NO INDEX, EXHIBITS NOT PROPERLY LABELED] RESPONSE to 101 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# [STRICKEN FROM RECORD AND FILED UNDER SEAL PER ORDER 2/24/06] (2) Exhibit B# 3 Exhibit C# 4 Exhibit D# 5 Exhibit E# 6 Exhibit F# 7 Exhibit G# 8 Exhibit H# 9 Exhibit I# 10 Exhibit J# 11 Exhibit K)(Utter, Gregory) Modified on 2/23/2006 (DHame, ). Modified on 2/24/2006 (SSchoe, ). (Entered: 02/22/2006)
114 EXHIBIT re 106 MOTION to Compel With Memorandum Of Law And Certificate Of Service by Cintas Corporation (FILED UNDER SEAL)(PMil, ) (Entered: 02/23/2006)
115 RESPONSE to 101 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas (Corrected) filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A Filed Under Seal# 3 Exhibit B Letter from Greg Utter to Richard Seymour dated January 4, 2006# 4 Exhibit C Letter from Rachel Geman to Greg Utter dated January 9, 2006# 5 Exhibit D Letter from Greg Utter to Rachel Geman dated January 13, 2006# 6 Exhibit E Letter from Rachel Geman to Greg Utter dated February 2, 2006# 7 Exhibit F Rodney v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.# 8 Exhibit G Matewski v. Orkin Extermination Co.# 9 Exhibit H Reeb v. Ohio Dep't of Rehab. & Corr.# 10 Exhibit I

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 22 of 132

02/23/2006 02/23/2006 02/24/2006 02/24/2006
02/24/2006 02/24/2006 02/27/2006 02/27/2006
02/27/2006 02/27/2006 03/06/2006
03/09/2006 03/10/2006 03/13/2006 03/13/2006

Richmond v. UPS Service Parts Logistics# 11 Exhibit J Perry v. Best Lock Corp.# 12 Exhibit K Gambale v. Deutche Bank A.G.)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 02/23/2006)
116 MOTION to Strike Exhibit by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 02/23/2006)
117 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation to filing under seal of Exhibit A to Defendant's Corrected Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 02/23/2006)
118 EXHIBIT A re 115 Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation (FILED UNDER SEAL).(DWor, ) (Entered: 02/24/2006)
119 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 116 MOTION to Strike Exhibit filed by Cintas Corporation; 105 MOTION to Amend/Correct 62 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen; 106 MOTION to Compel With Memorandum Of Law And Certificate Of Service filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RBri, ) (Entered: 02/24/2006)
120 ORDER to Strike Exhibit A of 113 Response to Motion, filed by Cintas Corporation, [Exhibit to be filed under seal]. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (SSchoe, ) (Entered: 02/24/2006)
121 MOTION to Intervene by Colleen Grindle, Ruthie richardson, Dawn Stevenson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exh. A −− proposed complaint in intervention)(Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 02/24/2006)
122 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 121 MOTION to Intervene filed by Colleen Grindle, Ruthie Richardson, Dawn Stevenson. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RBri, ) (Entered: 02/27/2006)
123 NOTICE of hearing on 105 MOTION to Amend/Correct 62 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order, 106 MOTION to Compel With Memorandum Of Law And Certificate Of Service, 116 MOTION to Strike Exhibit. Motion Hearing set for 3/14/2006 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (JHer, ) (Entered: 02/27/2006)
124 NOTICE of hearing on 121 MOTION to Intervene. Motion Hearing set for 3/14/2006 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (JHer, ) (Entered: 02/27/2006)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 2/27/2006 re 101 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Taken Under Advisement (Tape #DAS 06−024) (JHer, ) (Entered: 02/27/2006)
125 RESPONSE to 105 MOTION to Amend/Correct 62 Order on Motion to Amend/Correct Scheduling Order filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A Affidavit of Gregory M. Utter in Support of Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Amend the Scheduling Order# 3 Exhibit B Documents Produced to Date by Cintas Corporation)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/06/2006)
126 ORDER denying 101 Motion to Quash− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 03/09/2006)
127 RESPONSE to 121 MOTION to Intervene filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Rachel Geman# 2 Index of Exhibits # 3 Exhibit A# 4 Exhibit B)(Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 03/10/2006)
128 ORDER OVERRULING DEFENDANT'S re 71 Appeal of Magistrate Judge Decision. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RBri, ) (Entered: 03/13/2006)
129 RESPONSE to 121 MOTION to Intervene filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A Affidavit of Robert W. Maxwell II in Support of Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to the Grindle−Intevenors' Motion to Intervene)(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/13/2006)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 23 of 132

03/14/2006 03/14/2006
03/24/2006
04/11/2006 05/02/2006 05/03/2006 05/08/2006 05/19/2006
05/22/2006 05/22/2006 05/24/2006 06/05/2006 06/13/2006 06/21/2006 06/22/2006 07/10/2006
07/10/2006

130 STIPULATED AMENDED SCHEDULING ORDER resolving 105 MOTION to Amend/Correct 62 Scheduling Order, 106 MOTION to Compel − Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 03/14/2006)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 3/14/2006 re 121 MOTION to Intervene filed by Colleen Grindle,, Dawn Stevenson,, Ruthie Richardson, before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Taken Under Advisement (Tape #DAS 06−027) (MLan, ) (Entered: 03/15/2006)
131 [FILING ERROR − Motion should have been linked to docket entry 121 ] MOTION to Withdraw Motion to Intervene, without Prejudice (Unopposed Motion) by Colleen Grindle, Ruthie Richardson, Dawn Stevenson. (Strauss, Paul) Modified on 3/27/2006 (PMil, ). (Entered: 03/24/2006)
132 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 12/13/05 of motion hearing (DTyle, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2009: # 1 Main document) (JCha). (Entered: 04/11/2006)
133 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation.(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/02/2006)
134 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Attorney Robert K. Dawkins by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Dawkins, Robert) (Entered: 05/03/2006)
135 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 3/14/06 of Motion Hearing. (DWor, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2009: # 1 Main document) (JCha). (Entered: 05/09/2006)
136 [FILING ERROR − RULE 18 VIOLATIONS] MOTION Status Conference by all parties. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit March 14, 2006 Stipulated and Amended Scheduling Order signed by Magistrate Judge Scheer# 2 Exhibit Letter from W. Tishkoff and G. Utter to Court discussing the transfer motion and attaching related papers)(Wiltsek, Gena) Modified on 5/22/2006 (PMil, ). (Entered: 05/19/2006)
137 INDEX of Exhibits re 136 MOTION Status Conference by all parties.(Wiltsek, Gena) (Entered: 05/22/2006)
138 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 136 Joint MOTION for Status Conference. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. (RBri, ) (Entered: 05/22/2006)
139 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 6/13/2006 10:00 AM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. (MLan, ) (Entered: 05/24/2006)
140 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Notice of Recusal (Rapport, Adele) (Entered: 06/05/2006)
Minute Entry −Scheduling and Status Conference held on 6/13/2006 before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Parties to submit proposed scheduling order. (MLan, ) (Entered: 06/13/2006)
141 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jo Ann Farnsworth appearing on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.(Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 06/21/2006)
142 NOTICE of Appearance by Sierra R. Koch on behalf of Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Koch, Sierra) (Entered: 06/22/2006)
143 STIPULATED ORDER OF PRE−TRIAL CONSOLIDATION. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(RBri, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006)
144 ORDER. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission as Movant and Third−Party Plaintiff terminated; Cintas Corporation as Third−Party Defendant terminated. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(RBri, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 24 of 132

07/12/2006 07/12/2006 08/02/2006
08/07/2006 08/07/2006 08/10/2006 08/21/2006
08/25/2006 08/28/2006 09/01/2006

145 STIPULATED DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive Motion Cut−off set for 3/9/2007 Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (Refer to image for additional dates)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(MLan, ) (Entered: 07/12/2006)
146 STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT AND AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(MLan, ) (Entered: 07/12/2006)
147 MOTION to Quash Medical Records Subpoenas or, in the alternative, to Require Cintas to Hold the Subpoenas in Abeyance Pending a Hearing by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit B − Cintas Medical Records Subpoenas# 3 Exhibit C − 7/21 Letter from Wiltsek to Utter# 4 Exhibit D − Plaintiffs' Responses to D's Discovery Requests# 5 Exhibit E − 7/25 letter from Utter to Wiltsek# 6 Exhibit G − 7/28 Letter from Utter to Wiltsek# 7 Exhibit H − Perry v. Best Lock)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Wiltsek, Gena) (Entered: 08/02/2006)
148 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 147 MOTION to Quash Medical Records Subpoenas or, in the alternative, to Require Cintas to Hold the Subpoenas in Abeyance Pending a Hearing filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(RBri, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006)
149 Sealed Matter.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(RHutc, ) (Entered: 08/07/2006)
150 NOTICE of hearing on 147 MOTION to Quash Medical Records Subpoenas or, in the alternative, to Require Cintas to Hold the Subpoenas in Abeyance Pending a Hearing. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 9/1/2006. Motion Hearing set for 9/6/2006 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(MLan, ) (Entered: 08/10/2006)
151 RESPONSE to 147 MOTION to Quash Medical Records Subpoenas or, in the alternative, to Require Cintas to Hold the Subpoenas in Abeyance Pending a Hearing filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 2 March 9, 2006 Order Denying Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas# 3 Exhibit 3 Plaintiff's Supplemental Response to Defendant's Second Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Documents# 4 Exhibit 4 Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant's Third Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents# 5 Exhibit 5 Unpublished Decision# 6 Exhibit 6 Unpublished Decision)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/21/2006)
152 (Sealed) RESPONSE to 147 MOTION to Quash Medical Records Subpoenas or, in the alternative, to Require Cintas to Hold the Subpoenas in Abeyance Pending a Hearing filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(AGre, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)
Set/Reset Deadlines as to 147 MOTION to Quash Medical Records Subpoenas or, in the alternative, to Require Cintas to Hold the Subpoenas in Abeyance Pending a Hearing. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 9/15/2006. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2006 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(MLan, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)
153 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on February 27, 2006 of Motion to Quash Subpoenas Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(AGre, ) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/4/2009: # 1 Main document) (JCha). (Entered: 09/01/2006)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 25 of 132

09/01/2006 09/07/2006 09/07/2006 09/07/2006 09/08/2006 09/11/2006 09/11/2006 09/18/2006 01/03/2007
01/09/2007 01/10/2007 01/12/2007 01/12/2007 01/17/2007
01/26/2007

154 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 2/27/06 of Motion to quash subpoenas Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(RHutc, ) (Entered: 09/05/2006)
155 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Heather A. Morgan appearing on behalf of Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 09/07/2006)
156 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Maureen E. O'Neill appearing on behalf of Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(O'Neill, Maureen) (Entered: 09/07/2006)
157 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Nancy L. Abell appearing on behalf of Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/07/2006)
158 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jon A. Geier appearing on behalf of Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Geier, Jon) (Entered: 09/08/2006)
159 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Elena R. Baca appearing on behalf of Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Baca, Elena) (Entered: 09/11/2006)
160 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Elena R. Baca appearing on behalf of Cintas Corporation CORRECTION TO NOTICE OF APPEARANCE.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Baca, Elena) (Entered: 09/11/2006)
161 ORDER withdrawing 147 Motion to Quash− Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(MLan, ) (Entered: 09/18/2006)
162 STIPULATED SCHEDULING ORDER: Dispositive Motion Cut−off set for 6/8/2007 Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. (Refer to image for additional dates)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(MLan, ) (Entered: 01/03/2007)
163 MOTION to Intervene by Colleen Grindle, Ruthie Richardson, Dawn Stevenson. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 01/09/2007)
164 NOTICE by Mirna E. Serrano NOTICE OF CHANGE OF FIRM OF BILL LANN LEE Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Wiltsek, Gena) (Entered: 01/10/2007)
165 NOTICE of Appearance by Bill Lann Lee on behalf of Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Lee, Bill) (Entered: 01/12/2007)
166 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Lee, Bill) (Entered: 01/12/2007)
167 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Scheer: 163 MOTION to Intervene filed by Colleen Grindle, Dawn Stevenson, Ruthie Richardson. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(RBri, ) (Entered: 01/17/2007)
168 RESPONSE to 163 MOTION to Intervene filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1 (Part I)# 3 Document Continuation Exhibit 1 (Part II))Associated Cases:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 26 of 132

02/01/2007 02/08/2007 02/19/2007 03/19/2007 03/20/2007 03/21/2007 03/26/2007 03/26/2007 03/26/2007 03/28/2007 03/28/2007 03/28/2007

4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 01/26/2007)
169 NOTICE of hearing on 163 MOTION to Intervene. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 3/12/2007. Motion Hearing set for 3/14/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(MLan, ) (Entered: 02/01/2007)
170 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in Support of Motion to Intervene (Unopposed Motion) by Blanca Nelly Avalos. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS(Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 02/08/2007)
171 NOTICE by Colleen Grindle, Ruthie Richardson, Dawn Stevenson of withdrawal of (163 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 22 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Intervene. Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 02/19/2007)
172 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A# 3 Exhibit B# 4 Exhibit s C−H# 5 Memorandum of Law# 6 Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 03/19/2007)
173 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (31 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 172 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JMos) (Entered: 03/20/2007)
174 ORDER HOLDING SUBPOENAS IN ABEYANCE PENDING A HEARING ON MOTION 172 . Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (BRad, ) (Entered: 03/21/2007)
175 Notice of E−mail Delivery Failure as to attorney *Gena E. Wiltsek* Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (LBeh) (Entered: 03/26/2007)
176 NOTICE of hearing on (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 338 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 6/25/2008 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 03/26/2007)
177 NOTICE of hearing on (31 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 172 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 4/3/2007. Motion Hearing set for 4/5/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 03/26/2007)
178 Sealed MOTION to Compel by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 03/28/2007)
179 Sealed SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (37 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 03/28/2007)
180 NOTICE OF FAILURE TO COMPLY with Local Rule 5.1.1 issued to attorney Jennifer L. Brant re (38 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Supplemental Brief, (37 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 03/28/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 27 of 132

03/29/2007 03/30/2007
04/03/2007 04/03/2007 04/03/2007 04/04/2007
04/05/2007 04/11/2007 04/11/2007 04/11/2007 04/12/2007

181 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (37 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 178 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Mirna E. Serrano.. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 03/29/2007)
182 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (31 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 172 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash Avalos Plaintiffs' Response Memorandum in Support of the Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit 2)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 03/30/2007)
183 RESPONSE to (31 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash Subpeonas (Filed Under Seal) filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/03/2007)
184 NOTICE of hearing on (37 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 178 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 4/27/2007 Motion Hearing set for 5/1/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A ScheerAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/03/2007)
185 RESPONSE to (31 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash filed by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DEld) (Entered: 04/04/2007)
186 REPLY to Response re (31 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 172 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash [SERRANO AND AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' REPLY MEMORANDUM IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS ISSUED BY DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION TO ABSENT CLASS MEMBERS] filed by all plaintiffs.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 04/04/2007)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 4/5/2007 re (172 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 31 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash Subpoenas filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Granted (Tape #DAS 07−036) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/05/2007)
187 ORDER granting (172) Motion to Quash in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; granting (31) Motion to Quash in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/11/2007)
188 MOTION for Protective Order by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: Amended Notice to Take Deposition Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6))Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/11/2007)
189 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (47 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 188 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 04/11/2007)
190 NOTICE of hearing on (47 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 188 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 5/3/2007 Motion Hearing set for 5/7/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer NOTICE: THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO FORWARD HARD COPIES OF ALL PLEADINGS RELEVANT TO THE MOTION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCHEER'S CHAMBERS BY 5/3/07.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/12/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 28 of 132

04/16/2007 04/16/2007 04/19/2007 04/19/2007 04/19/2007 04/26/2007 04/26/2007 04/26/2007 04/27/2007 04/27/2007
04/30/2007

191 Notice of Failure to Comply with ECF Policies and Procedures as to attorney Lawrence A. Fields. (Attachments: # 1 MailDelivery Failure) (KWil) (Entered: 04/16/2007)
192 RESPONSE to (37 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/16/2007)
193 OBJECTION to Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/19/2007)
194 Notice of Failure to Comply with ECF Policies and Procedures as to attorney Lawrence A. Fields. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (ATee) (Entered: 04/19/2007)
195 OBJECTION to (46 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Order on Motion to Quash by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DEld) (Entered: 04/20/2007)
196 (NOTICE OF FILING) MOTION for Order Prohibiting Plaintiffs' Submission of Declarations of Unnamed Class Members in Support of Class Certification [Under Seal] by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 4/30/2007 (Brissaud, R.). (Entered: 04/26/2007)
197 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to (51 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 193 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Objection (Unopposed Motion) by all plaintiffs.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 04/26/2007)
200 MOTION for Order Prohibiting Plaintiffs' Submission of Declarations of Unnamed Class Members in support of Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. [FILED UNDER SEAL] Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (NHol) (Entered: 04/30/2007)
198 ORDER withdrawing (178) Motion to Compel in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; withdrawing (37) Motion to Compel in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/27/2007)
199 RESPONSE to (47 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order / Defendant Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition To Plaintiff−Intervenor EEOC's Motion For Protective Order − REDACTED VERSION filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1 − Job Patterns# 3 Exhibit 2 − Excerpt of SIC Codes# 4 Exhibit 3 − Excerpt of NAICS Codes# 5 Exhibit 4 − April 17 Meet and Confer Letter# 6 Exhibit 5 − April 18 2007 Meet and Confer Letter# 7 Exhibit 6 − Deposition Notice re Electronic Databases, etc.# 8 Exhibit 7 − Deposition Notice re Certain Personnel Mgmt Policies, etc.# 9 Exhibit 8 − Amended Deposition Notice re Location 213# 10 Exhibit 9 − Amended Deposition Notice re Locations 206 and 782# 11 Exhibit 10 − Cintas' Notice of 30(b)(6) Deposition to EEOC# 12 Exhibit 11 − November 30 2006 Letter from EEOC# 13 Exhibit 12 − Cintas' Amended Notice of 30(b)(6) Deposition to EEOC# 14 Exhibit 13 − April 2 2007 Meet and Confer Letter# 15 Exhibit 14 − Excerpts from 29 CFR Sec. 1608# 16 Exhibit 15 − August 30 2004 Letter from EEOC − CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBIT − not publicly filed# 17 Exhibit 16 − Profile Page for EEO−1 Industry Parameters# 18 Exhibit 17 − Best Practices of Private Sector Employers# 19 Exhibit 18 − Excerpt from Compliance Manual − Sec. 632# 20 Exhibit 19 − Excerpts from Fultz Deposition − CONFIDENTIAL EXHIBIT − not publicly filed# 21 Exhibit 20 − EEOC Policy Guide on Compensatory and Punitive Damages# 22 Exhibit 21 − Revised General Counsel's Memorandum on CRA of 1991# 23 Exhibit 22 − Unpublished cases cited in Memorandum)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geier, Jon) (Entered: 04/27/2007)
201 ORDER granting (197) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; granting (55) Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS Response to defendant's

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 29 of 132

04/30/2007 04/30/2007 04/30/2007
04/30/2007 05/01/2007 05/04/2007 05/09/2007 05/09/2007 05/10/2007
05/11/2007

objections due by 5/4/2007. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 04/30/2007)
202 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (200 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 58 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Order Prohibiting Plaintiffs' Submission of Declarations of Unnamed Class Memebers filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 04/30/2007)
203 NOTICE of hearing on (58 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 200 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Order. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 5/24/2007 Motion Hearing set for 5/29/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A ScheerAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/30/2007)
204 MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A Serrano's Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Documents# 3 Exhibit B Allen's Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and Document Requests# 4 Exhibit C McVay's Responses to First Set of Interrogatories and Document Requests# 5 Exhibit D February 15, 2007 Letter# 6 Exhibit E February 23, 2007 Letter# 7 Exhibit F April 24, 2007 Letter# 8 Exhibit G April 26, 2007 Letter)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/30/2007)
205 MOTION to Compel by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/30/2007)
206 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on 4/5/2007. (Court Reporter: Karin Dains) (Number of Pages: 26) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (NHol) (Entered: 05/02/2007)
207 RESPONSE to Cintas' Objections to Magistrate's Order filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Ruthie Richardson, Dawn Stevenson, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 05/04/2007)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 5/9/2007 re (47 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 188 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Denied (Tape #DAS 07−049) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 05/09/2007)
208 ORDER denying (188) Motion for Protective Order in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; denying (47) Motion for Protective Order in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 05/09/2007)
209 RESPONSE to (58 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Order PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR ORDER PROHIBITING PLAINTIFFS' SUBMISSION OF UNNAMED CLASS MEMBERS IN SUPPORT OF CLASS CERTIFICATION filed by all plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1 − Excerpt of Pls' Opp to Def's Mtn for Protective Order# 3 Exhibit 2 − Excerpt of transcripts of hearing on Def's Mtn for Protective Order# 4 Exhibit 3 − Excerpt of Stipulated Discovery Order# 5 Exhibit 4 − Sample letter from Pls' to absent class member# 6 Exhibit 5 − Excerpt of transcript of hearing on Pls' Mtn to Quash# 7 Exhibit 6 − Declaration of Jean Albanilla)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Wiltsek, Gena) (Entered: 05/10/2007)
210 RESPONSE to (62 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano.

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 30 of 132

05/14/2007 05/14/2007 05/15/2007
05/17/2007 05/18/2007 05/18/2007 05/22/2007 05/24/2007 05/25/2007
05/29/2007 05/29/2007

(Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit Exhbit A − February 15, 2007 Letter from Donyetta D. Bailey to Rachel Geman# 3 Exhibit Exhibit B − February 23, 2007 Letter from Allison Elgart to Donyetta Bailey# 4 Exhibit Exhibit C − April 24, 2007 Letter from Donyetta Bailey to Allison Elgart# 5 Exhibit Exhibit D − April 26, 2007 Letter from Daniel J. Calhoun to Allison Elgart# 6 Exhibit Exhibit E − April 30, 2007 Letter from Allison Elgart to Donyetta Bailey and Daniel Calhoun)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 05/11/2007)
211 NOTICE of Appearance by Roberta L. Steele on behalf of Blanca Nelly Avalos.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/14/2007)
212 RESPONSE to (205 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 63 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Weaver, Omar) (Entered: 05/14/2007)
213 OBJECTION to (208 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 66 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Order on Motion for Protective Order, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A: Defendant Cintas Corporation's Amended Notice of Deposition Pursuant to Rule 30(b)(6)# 3 Exhibit B: Magistrate's Order Denying EEOC's Motion for a Protective Order)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 05/15/2007)
214 NOTICE of Appearance by Heather Mills on behalf of Blanca Nelly Avalos.Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Mills, Heather) (Entered: 05/17/2007)
Reset Deadlines as to (58 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 200 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Order. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 6/5/2007 Motion Hearing set for 6/7/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 05/18/2007)
215 REPLY to (193 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash Subpoenas by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/18/2007)
216 REPLY to Response re (62 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit A Letter from Allison Elgart to Greg Utter)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/22/2007)
217 REPLY to Response re (58 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Order filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/24/2007)
218 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (62 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 204 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation, (205 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 63 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 05/25/2007)
219 REPLY to Response re (63 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel (Filed Under Seal) filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/29/2007)
220 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on May 7, 2007. (Court Reporter: Karin Dains) (Number of Pages: 25) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 05/30/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 31 of 132

05/30/2007 06/01/2007 06/05/2007 06/05/2007 06/05/2007 06/06/2007
06/06/2007

221 NOTICE of hearing on (62 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 204 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel, (205 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 63 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel.Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 6/5/2007, Motion Hearing set for 6/7/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 05/30/2007)
222 MEMORANDUM re (71 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Objection, / Defendant Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff−Intervenor EEOC's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Order Denying EEOC's Motion for Protective Order by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit List# 2 Exhibit A − Transcript# 3 Exhibit B − Magistrate Judge's Order# 4 Exhibit C − Unpublished Cases Cited)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geier, Jon) (Entered: 06/01/2007)
223 STIPULATION AND ORDER, Set Motion Hearings as to (63 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 205 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel, (204 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 62 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel Answers to Discovery Requests, (58 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 200 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Order : Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 6/19/2007 Motion Hearing set for 6/21/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/05/2007)
224 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Defendant Cintas Corporation's Notice of Ex Parte Applicaiton To Allow Defendant Additional Pages On Its Motions For Summary Judgment As To Plaintiffs Blanca Nelly Avalos and Anthony Jones# 2 Ex Parte Application and Proposed Order To Allow Defendant Additional Pages On Its Motions for Summary Judgment# 3 Declaration of Heather Morgan In Support of Ex Parte Application to Allow Defendant Additional Pages On Its Motions For Summary Judgment)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 06/05/2007)
225 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing Under Seal of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motions for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos (With Supporting Declarations and Exhibits) and As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones (With Supporting Declarations and Exhibits) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 06/05/2007)
226 MOTION for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and Request For Hearing by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Defendant Cintas Corporation's Brief In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos# 2 Index of Declarations Filed Concurrently Herewith# 3 Declaration of Laura D. Heckathorn# 4 Declaration of Nancy Abell# 5 Declaration of Kenneth Storsin# 6 Declaration of Jason Fujiki# 7 Declaration of Brett Henderson# 8 Declaration of Donald Rowlett# 9 Declaration of Robert Sherwood# 10 Declaration of Beatrice Flores# 11 Declaration of Courtney Langdon# 12 Declaration of Ana Luna# 13 Declaration of Donald Johnson# 14 Declaration of Michael R. Brigger# 15 Declaration of Jonnie Hogel# 16 Declaration of Jean Albanilla# 17 [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 06/06/2007)
227 MOTION for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones And Request For Hearing by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Defendant Cintas Corporation's Brief In Support Of Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones# 2 Index of Declarations Filed Concurrently Herewith# 3 Declaration of Nancy L. Abell# 4 Declaration of Anne Nergaard# 5 Declaration of Mike Silvia# 6 Declaration of Christie Fenton# 7 Declaration of Vickie Lowder# 8 Declaration of Matthew Christopher# 9 Declaration of Tracy Henry# 10 [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 32 of 132

06/06/2007 06/07/2007 06/07/2007 06/07/2007 06/07/2007 06/07/2007 06/07/2007
06/07/2007 06/07/2007 06/07/2007 06/07/2007

The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 06/06/2007)
228 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation of withdrawal of (62 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 204 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel Discovery Requests.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/06/2007)
229 NOTICE of hearing on (354 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 211 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Strike (206 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion. Motion Hearing set for 6/30/2008 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. (MLan) (Entered: 06/07/2007)
230 DECLARATION by Jonnie Hogel re: (84 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos, (83 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS), Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RHut) (filed under seal) (Entered: 06/08/2007)
231 MOTION for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Blanca Nelly Avalos and Request for hearing by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RHut) (filed under seal) (Entered: 06/08/2007)
232 Sealed Matter re:declaration of Jean Albanella in support of 226 (sealed in vault)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DHam) (Entered: 06/08/2007)
233 Sealed Matter regarding:Declaration of Tracy Henry, Matthew Christopher, Vickie Lowder, Christie Fenton, Mike Silvia, Anne Nergaard, Nancy L. Abell, Index of Declarations and Brief in support of 227 (sealed in vault)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DHam) Modified on 6/8/2007 (Hamel, D.). (Entered: 06/08/2007)
234 DECLARATIONS by Laura Heckathorn, Nancy Abell, Kenneth A. Storsin, Jason Fujik, Brett Henderson, Donald Rowlett, Robert Sherwood, Deatric Flores, Courtney Langdon, Ana Luna, Donald Johnson and Michael R. Brigger re: (89 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 89 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RHut)(filed under seal) (Entered: 06/08/2007)
235 INDEX of 234 declarations filed concurrently in support of defenadant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RHut) (filed under seal) (Entered: 06/08/2007)
236 BRIEF in support, re: (89 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 89 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment or in the alternative, MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as ti Blanca Nelly Avalos by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RHut)(filed under seal) (Entered: 06/08/2007)
237 MOTION for Summary Judgment, or in the alternative, MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment as to Anthony Jones and Request for Hearing by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RHut)(filed under seal) (Entered: 06/08/2007)
239 BRIEF in support Motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment as to plaintiff Anthony Jones (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS and 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) filed by Cintas Corporation. (filed under seal)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 06/13/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 33 of 132

06/07/2007 06/11/2007
06/21/2007 06/22/2007
06/22/2007 06/25/2007 07/10/2007 07/31/2007 07/31/2007 08/01/2007

240 INDEX OF DECLARATIONS in support of Motion for summary judgment or, in the alternative, partial summary judgment as to plaintiff Anthony Jones (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS and 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) filed by Cintas Corporation. (filed under seal)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 06/13/2007)
238 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (89 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 231 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation, (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 06/11/2007)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 6/21/2007 re (58 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 200 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Order Prohibiting Plaintiffs' Submissions of Declarations filed by Cintas Corporation before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Taken under advisement. (Tape #DAS 07−064) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/22/2007)
241 NOTICE of hearing on Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Nelly Avalos and Anthony Jones (Docket Numbers 226 , 227 , 231 and 237 in 04−40132 and 84 , 85 , 89 and 95 in 06−12311). Responses due by 8/6/2007, Replies due by 9/6/2007, Motion Hearing set for 9/26/2007 02:00 PM before Honorable Donald A Scheer. THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO FORWARD HARD COPIES OF ALL PAPERS RELEVANT TO THESE MOTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCHEER'S CHAMBERS. (MLan) (Entered: 06/22/2007)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 6/22/2007 re (205 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 63 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Granted (Tape #DAS 07−064) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/22/2007)
242 ORDER granting (205) Motion to Compel in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; granting (63) Motion to Compel in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/25/2007)
243 EXHIBIT F to the Declaration of Mike Silvia in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Notice of Motion and re (227 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones And Request For Hearing by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 07/10/2007)
244 [STRICKEN: DISCOVERY] NOTICE by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation to Take the Deposition of Gail Cober Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 7/31/2007 (Peruski, D.). (Entered: 07/31/2007)
245 [STRICKEN: DISCOVERY] NOTICE by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation to Take the Deposition of Shirley Lamb Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 7/31/2007 (Peruski, D.). (Entered: 07/31/2007)
246 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to (83 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 225 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) −− UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSES TO SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTIONS by all plaintiffs.Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/01/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 34 of 132

08/06/2007
08/20/2007
08/20/2007 08/20/2007 08/20/2007
08/20/2007 08/20/2007 08/20/2007 08/20/2007 08/20/2007 08/20/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007

247 ORDER granting (246)in 04−40132 and (104)in 06−12311 Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses and Replies re: Summary Judgment Motions Responses due by 8/20/2007 Replies due by 9/20/2007. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 08/06/2007)
248 APPLICATION (Ex Parte) and [Proposed] Order to Allow Plaintiffs Avalos and Jones Additional Pages on Their Brief in Response to Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
249 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones re (106 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Application, for Ex Parte Application Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
250 NOTICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos Notice of Filing Under Seal Plaintiffs' Opposition to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgement or Partial Summary Judgement to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
251 RESPONSE to (85 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment, (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment Opposition Brief filed by Anthony Jones.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
252 DECLARATION by Anthony Jones re (251 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Anthony JonesAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
253 DECLARATION by Scott A. Entin re (251 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Anthony JonesAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
254 DECLARATION by Whit Soule re (251 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Anthony JonesAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
255 DECLARATION by Bonnie Schwid re (251 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Anthony JonesAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
256 DECLARATION by Thomas A. DiPrete re (251 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Anthony JonesAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
257 DECLARATION by Barbara F. Reskin re (251 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Anthony JonesAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Strauss, Paul) (Entered: 08/20/2007)
258 Plaintiff's Objections to a Portion of Courtney Langdon's Declaration Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
259 Plaintiff's Objections to a Portion of Donald Rowlett's Declaration Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
260 Plaintiff's Objection to a Portion of Jason Fujiki's Declaration Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 35 of 132

08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/22/2007 08/30/2007
09/10/2007

261 DECLARATION by Blanca Nelly Avalos Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
262 DECLARATION by Whitman Soule Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
263 DECLARATION by Barbara Reskin Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
264 DECLARATION by Thomas Diprete Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
265 DECLARATION by Jacqueline Thompson Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
266 Plaintiff's Objections to a Portion of Ana Luna's Declaration Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
267 Plaintiff's Objections to a Portion of Beatrice Flores' Declaration Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
268 Plaintiffs' Objections to a Portion of Bret Henderson's Declaration Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
269 Plaintiffs' Objections to a Portion of Kenneth Storsin's Declaration Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
270 Plaintiffs' Objections to a Portion of Laura Heckathorn's Declaration Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
271 Plaintiffs' Objections to a Portion of Michael Brigger's Declaration Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
272 Plaintiffs' Objections to a Portion of Robert Sherwood's Declaration Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
273 Index of Declarations Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
274 Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/23/2007)
ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (293 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 436 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Serrano and Avalos Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and Quash Thirty−One Unauthorized Document Subpoenas Issued by Cintas to Former Employers and Schools of Absent Class. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 08/30/2007)
275 ORDER OVERRULING OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S ORDERS (51 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 193 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Objection filed by Cintas Corporation, (195 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 53 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Objection filed by Cintas Corporation, (213 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 71 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Objection, filed by

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 36 of 132

09/12/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007
09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 09/10/2007)
276 STIPULATION FOR DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER RELATING TO EXPERT DISCOVERY AND CERTAIN PRE−TRIAL MATTERS by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cintas Corporation, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 09/12/2007)
277 ORDER Granting (106 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 248 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Application, filed by Anthony Jones, Blanca Nelly Avalos Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
278 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing Under Seal Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos (with Supporting Declarations and Exhibits and Objections to Evidence and Responses to Objections to Defendant's Evidence) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
279 REPLY to Response re (84 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 226 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos and Request For Hearing filed by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
280 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, INDEX OF DECLARATIONS filed by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Index of Declarations Filed Concurrently Herewith In Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporaton's Motion for Summary Judgment# 2 Document Continuation Supplemental Declaration of Jason Fujiki in Support of Cintas' Reply# 3 Document Continuation Supplemental Declaratio of Beatrice Flores in Support of Cintas' Reply# 4 Document Continuation Supplemental Declaration of Laura D. Heckathorn in support of Cintas' Reply# 5 Document Continuation Declaration of Mary D. Baker, Ph.D. and Janet R. Thornton, Ph.D. in Support of Cintas' Reply)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
281 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Objections of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Declaration of Dr. Barbara Reskin Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgmentas to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
282 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 8/25/2008 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
283 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, OBJECTIONS of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Declaration of Whitman T. Soule Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
284 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, OBJECTIONS of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Declaration of Blanca Nelly Avalos Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 37 of 132

09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007

4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
285 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's OBJECTIONS to Portions of the Declaration of Jacqueline Thompson in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
286 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO A PORTION OF MICHAEL BRIGGER'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
287 Notice of Filing Transcript. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Hryshko, T) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
288 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO A PORTION OF JASON FUJIKI'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
289 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO A PORTION OF LAURA HECKATHORN'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
290 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO A PORTION OF BRETT HENDERSON'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
291 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO A PORTION OF COURTNEY LANGDON'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
292 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO A PORTION OF ANA LUNA'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
293 SECOND NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 8/25/2008 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. ONLY LEAD COUNSEL NEED TO APPEAR. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
294 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFFS' OBJECTIONS TO A

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 38 of 132

09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007
09/18/2007 09/18/2007

PORTION OF ROBERT SHERWOOD'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
295 DECLARATION re (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, Cintas Corporation's RESPONSE OBJECTIONS TO A PORTION OF KENNETH STORSIN'S DECLARATION in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporaiton's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
296 APPENDIX re: (279 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation APPENDIX OF UNPUBLISHED CASES CITED in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
297 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation re (227 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones And Request For Hearing NOTICE of Filing Under Seal Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Plaintiff Anthony Jones' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones with Supporting Declarations and Exhibits and Objections to Evidence) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
298 APPLICATION EX PARTE APPLICATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER To Allow Defendant Additional Pages on Its Reply to Plaintiff Anthony Jones' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
299 REPLY to Response re (85 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 227 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment Cintas Corporation's REPLY Memorandum to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones filed by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
300 DECLARATION re (299 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, INDEX OF DECLARATIONS FILED CONCURRENTLY HEREWITH IN SUPPORT OF CINTAS REPLY filed by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Declarations of Mary D. Baker, Ph.D. and Janet R. Thornton, Ph.D. in Support of Cintas Reply as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones# 2 Document Continuation Supplemental Declaration of Mike Silvia in Support of Cintas Reply as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones# 3 Document Continuation Declaration of M. Patricia Fisher in Support of Reply as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones# 4 Document Continuation Supplemental Declaration of Anne Nergaard in Support of Reply as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
301 DECLARATION re (299 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION TO DECLARATION OF DR. BARBARA RESKIN Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
302 DECLARATION re (299 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION TO DECLARATION AND REPORT OF THOMAS A. DIPRETE Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 39 of 132

09/18/2007 09/18/2007 09/18/2007
09/18/2007
09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007
09/19/2007

303 DECLARATION re (299 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION TO DECLARATION OF WHITMAN T. SOULE Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
304 DECLARATION re (299 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, OBJECTIONS OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION TO THE DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
305 DECLARATION re (299 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S OBJECTIONS TO PORTIONS OF THE DECLARATION OF ANTHONY JONES IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF ANTHONY JONES filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
306 APPENDIX re: (299 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation APPENDIX OF UNPUBLISHED CASES CITED in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/18/2007)
307 Objections of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Declaration of Whitman T. Soule Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
308 Objections of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Declaration of Blanca Nelly Avalos Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
309 Defendant Cintas Corporation's Objections to Portions of the Declaration of Jacqueline Thompson Filed Under SealAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
310 Sealed OBJECTION to (160 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 302 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Declaration, by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) Modified on 9/20/2007 (Greer, A.). (Entered: 09/20/2007)
311 Sealed Index of DECLARATIONS Filed Concurrently Herewith In Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply Memorandum to Plaintiffs' Brief in Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative Partial Summay Judgment as to Plaintiff Avalos.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
312 Sealed SUPPLEMENTAL Declaration of Jason Fujiki (288 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 146 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
313 Sealed Supplemental DECLARATION by Beatrice Flores re (287 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 145 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) In Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 40 of 132

09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/19/2007 09/24/2007 09/25/2007 09/26/2007 09/26/2007
10/23/2007

Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
314 Sealed Supplemental DECLARATION by Laura D. Heckathorn re (234 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 92 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
315 Sealed DECLARATION by Mary D. Baker, PH.D. and Janet R. Thornton, PH.D. in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
316 Sealed OBJECTION to (257 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 115 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Declaration of Dr. Barbara Reskin filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
317 Sealed OBJECTIONS of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Declaration of Thomas A. Diprete and Reports of Thomas A. Diprete and John Pencavel Filed in Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
318 Sealed RESPONSE to (129 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 271 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Plaintiffs' Objections to a Portion of Michael Brigger's Declaration in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (AGre) (Entered: 09/20/2007)
319 DECLARATION by SCOTT A. ENTIN −− SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATION IN RESPONSE TO CINTAS CORPORATION'S OBJECTIONS TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT ENTIN AND DECLARATION OF WHITMAN SOULE, CONCERNING CINTAS CORPORATION'S AUTHENTICATION OF APPLICANT FLOW LOGS AS BUSINESS RECORDS (FILED UNDER SEAL) filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony JonesAssociated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 09/24/2007)
320 Sealed MatterAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RHut) (Entered: 09/25/2007)
321 DECLARATION by RESUME OF JERRY MIOSI filed by Cintas CorporationAssociated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/26/2007)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 9/26/2007 re (89 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 231 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,) MOTION for Summary Judgment or for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation, (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment or for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation before Honorable Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motions Taken Under Advisment − R&R to Issue. (Tape #DAS 07−099) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) Modified on 6/10/2008 (MLan). (Entered: 09/27/2007)
322 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah E. Siskind on behalf of Anthony Jones, Anthony Jones.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 10/23/2007)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 41 of 132

10/23/2007 12/04/2007 12/05/2007 01/17/2008 02/19/2008
02/20/2008 02/28/2008 02/28/2008 02/29/2008
03/03/2008 03/03/2008

323 NOTICE of Appearance by Sarah E. Siskind on behalf of Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 10/23/2007)
324 NOTICE of Change of Electronic Filing Registration Information by A. Poppy Goudsmit on behalf of Mirna E. Serrano Stephanie McVay and Linda Allen (Plaintiffs).Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Goudsmit, A.) (Entered: 12/04/2007)
325 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Attorney A. Poppy Goudsmit by Mirna E. Serrano.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Goudsmit, A.) (Entered: 12/05/2007)
326 [SEALED PER 468 ] MOTION for Leave to File Fifth Amended Complaint by Blanca Nelly Avalos. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits # 2 Exhibit 1# 3 Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit 3# 5 Exhibit 4# 6 Exhibit 5# 7 Exhibit 6) [FILING ERROR: EXHIBIT LABELING ERROR] Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) Modified on 1/18/2008 (Eldridge, D.). Modified on 8/21/2008 (JPur). (Entered: 01/17/2008)
327 [FILING ERROR − RULE 11] STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: (1) AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) FILING OF FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; (3) LIMITED REOPENING OF LAY DISCOVERY; (4) REVISED EXPERT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND (5) REQUEST FOR CLASS ACTION HEARING DATE by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Morgan, Heather) Modified on 2/19/2008 (CGre). (Entered: 02/19/2008)
328 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (89 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 231 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment or for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation as to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos. Signed by Honorable Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 02/20/2008)
329 Avalos Plaintiffs' Report on Meet and Confer on Motion for Leave to Amend and Resulting Stipulation REPORT by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/28/2008)
330 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos re (329 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Report (Free) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/28/2008)
331 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: (1) AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; (2) FILING OF FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT; (3) LIMITED REOPENING OF LAY DISCOVERY; (4) REVISED EXPERT AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND (5) REQUEST FOR CLASS ACTION HEARING DATE. Motions terminated: (326 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 184 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Leave to File Fifth Amended Complaint filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 02/29/2008)
332 AMENDED COMPLAINT Avalos Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Complaint filed by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones against Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 03/03/2008)
333 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones re (332 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Amended Complaint, Avalos Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Complaint Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 03/03/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 42 of 132

03/04/2008 03/12/2008 03/12/2008 03/13/2008 03/13/2008
03/18/2008
03/25/2008 03/27/2008 03/28/2008 03/31/2008 04/01/2008 04/02/2008 04/04/2008

334 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ( Objections to R&R due by 3/12/2008) Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 03/04/2008)
335 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 03/12/2008)
336 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation by Blanca Nelly Avalos.[SEALED] Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DEld) (Entered: 03/13/2008)
337 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/13/2008)
338 MOTION for Summary Judgment on all Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan (Filed Under Seal) by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 8/12/2008 (PMil).[DOCUMENT RECEIVED IN FLINT CLERK'S OFFICE 8/12/08 WHICH INCLUDED EXHIBITS A−T] (Entered: 03/13/2008)
339 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 338 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation, (195 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 337 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Leave to File filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Honorable Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 03/18/2008)
340 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses Defendant Cintas Corporation's Answer to Plaintiffs' Fifth Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 03/25/2008)
341 STATEMENT of DISCLOSURE of CORPORATE AFFILIATIONS and FINANCIAL INTEREST by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 03/27/2008)
342 NOTICE of hearing on (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 338 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 6/25/2008 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 03/28/2008)
343 RESPONSE REPORT FILED UNDER SEAL: Defendant Cintas Corporation's Response to Plaintiff Avalos' Objections to Magistrate Judge Scheer's February 20, 2008 Report and Recommendation by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 03/31/2008)
344 RESPONSE to Objection to Report and Recommendation by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 04/03/2008)
345 [SEALED] RESPONSE to (194 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Objection to Report and Recommendation by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DEld) Modified on 4/3/2008 (DEld). (Entered: 04/03/2008)
346 RESPONSE to (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 338 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 43 of 132

04/07/2008 04/07/2008 04/07/2008 04/07/2008 04/08/2008
04/17/2008
04/18/2008
04/21/2008 04/21/2008 04/21/2008 04/22/2008 05/05/2008

04/04/2008)
347 RESPONSE to (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Brant, Jennifer) (Entered: 04/07/2008)
348 REPLY to Response to Objections to Magistrate Judge Scheer's February 20, 2008 Report and Recommendation filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 04/07/2008)
Sealed Response 347 received in Flint Clerk's Office on April 10, 2008. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (SGon) (Entered: 04/10/2008)
Sealed Reply 348 received in Flint Clerk's Office on April 10, 2008. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (SGon) (Entered: 04/10/2008)
349 RESPONSE to (338 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment on all Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan (Filed Under Seal) filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos. [FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER] Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (BSoc) (Entered: 04/08/2008)
350 STIPULATION and Order Granting Defendant Cintas Corporation's Request to File a Consolidated Reply Brief in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/17/2008)
351 STIPULATION AND ORDER re (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 338 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment that Cintas Corporation may file a consolidated reply brief in support not to exceed ten pages in length. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/18/2008)
352 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing (Under Seal) of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Consolidated Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside State of Michigan Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/21/2008)
353 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing (under seal) of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Consolidated Reply in Support of Its Motion For Summary Judgment on all Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/21/2008)
354 MOTION to Strike (206 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/21/2008)
355 Defendant Cintas Corporation's Consolidated Reply in Support of its Motion for Summary Judgment on all Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Memebers Applying Outside the State of Michigan Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 04/25/2008)
356 RESPONSE to (211 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Strike (206 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, Avalos Plaintiff' Opposition to Cintas' Motion to Strike filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 44 of 132

05/05/2008 05/05/2008 05/05/2008
05/05/2008 05/05/2008 05/06/2008 05/06/2008 05/13/2008 05/13/2008 05/15/2008 05/19/2008 05/19/2008 05/19/2008

05/05/2008)
357 MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
358 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Memorandum in Support of Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint (under seal) filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
359 DECLARATION by Sarah Siskind re (215 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Supplemental Brief, (357 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint in Support filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
360 DECLARATION by Tanesha Mekal Davis re (357 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
361 DECLARATION by Cindy Patterson re (357 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
362 DECLARATION of Sarah Siskind in Support of Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/06/2008)
Sealed Supplemental Brief 358 received in Flint Clerk's Office on May 6, 2008. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DWor) (Entered: 05/07/2008)
363 Notice of Failure to Comply with ECF Policies and Procedures as to attorney Paul Strauss. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (DHam) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
380 Expert REPORT of Mary D. Baker,Ph.D, and Janet R. Thornton, Ph.D Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/22/2008)
364 NOTICE of Withdrawal of Attorney Sharon K. Legenza and Paul Strauss by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Anthony Jones, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones. Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 05/15/2008)
365 REPLY to Response re (211 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Strike (206 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/19/2008)
366 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cintas Corporation Re: Filing Under Seal with the Court the Expert Report of Mary D. Baker, Ph.D. and Janet R. Thornton, Ph.D. [Dated November 14, 2007] Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 05/19/2008)
367 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cintas Corporation Re: Filing Under Seal with the Court the Sur−Rebuttal Report of Mary D. Baker, Ph.D. and Janet R. Thornton, Ph.D. [Dated May 14, 2008] Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS,

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 45 of 132

05/19/2008 05/19/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008
05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/21/2008

4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 05/19/2008)
368 NOTICE of hearing on (328 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 472 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel. Motion Hearing set for 11/20/2008 04:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 05/19/2008)
369 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cintas Corporation Re: Filing Under Seal with the Court the Reply of Philip E. Tetlock, Ph.D., to Rebuttal of Plaintiffs' Expert Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 05/19/2008)
370 Defendant Cintas Corporation's Expert Witness Designation WITNESS LIST by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
371 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos Proof of Service Re Filing Under Seal With The Court Thomas A. Diprete Report Dated May 31, 2007 Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
372 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos Proof of Service Re Filing Under Seal With The Court Rebuttal Report In Response to The November 14, 2007 Analysis of Hiring Decisions Report By Mary Baker and Janet Thornton by Thomas Diprete, Dated, March 19, 2003 Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
373 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos Proof of Service Re Filing Under Seal With The Court Declaration of Mark R. Killingsworth, D. Phil, dated August 31, 2007 Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
374 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos Proof of Service Re Filing Under Seal With The Court Rebuttal Report of Mark R. Killingsworth, D. Phil, dated March 19, 2008 Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
375 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos Proof of Service Re Filing Under Seal With The Court John Pencavel Report, dated May 2007 Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
376 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos Proof of Service Re Filing Under Seal With The Court Report Of Barbara F. Reskin, Ph. D., dated May 30, 2007 Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
377 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos Proof of Service Re Filing Under Seal With The Court Rebuttal Of Barbara Reskin To Defense Expert Report Of Dr. Tetlock And Appendix Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/21/2008)
378 SERRANO AND AVALOS PLAINTIFFS EXPERT WITNESS LIST by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) Modified on 5/22/2008 (BSoc). [STRICKEN] (Entered: 05/21/2008)
379 SERRANO AND AVALOS PLAINTIFFS EXPERT WITNESS LIST by Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) Modified on 5/22/2008 (BSoc). [STRICKEN] (Entered: 05/21/2008)
381 Sur−Rebuttal REPORT of Mary D. Baker, Ph.D and Janet R. Thornton, Ph.D Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/22/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 46 of 132

05/21/2008 05/21/2008 05/22/2008
05/22/2008 05/22/2008 05/22/2008 05/22/2008 05/22/2008 05/22/2008 05/22/2008 05/22/2008 05/28/2008
05/29/2008
06/02/2008
06/02/2008

382 REPLY of Philip E. Tetlock, Ph.D, to Rebuttal of Plaintiffs' Expert Witness Filed Under Seal. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/22/2008)
384 Expert REPORT of Philip E. Tetlock, Ph.D, Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/22/2008)
383 NOTICE of Error re (235 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 378 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Witness List, (236 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 379 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Witness List. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (BSoc) (Entered: 05/22/2008)
385 RESPONSE to (214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/22/2008)
386 John Pencavel REPORT Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/23/2008)
387 Thomas A. Diprette REPORT Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/23/2008)
388 Rebuttal REPORT in Response to November 14, 2007 Analysis of Hiring Decisions Report by Mary Baker and Janet Thornton by Thomas Diprete Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/23/2008)
389 Rebuttal REPORT of Mark R. Kilingsworth, D. Phil Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/23/2008)
390 DECLARATION of Mark R. Killingsworth, D. Phil Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/23/2008)
391 Rebuttal of Barbara Reskin to Defense Expert Report of Dr. Tetlock and Appendix Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/23/2008)
392 REPORT of Barbara F. Reskin Ph.D. Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 05/23/2008)
393 AMENDED NOTICE of hearing on (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing ADJOURNED to 6/30/2008 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 05/28/2008)
394 NOTICE of Appearance by Judson H. Miner on behalf of Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Anthony Jones. Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 05/29/2008)
395 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (354 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 211 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Strike Response to Motion filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
396 REPLY to Response re (357 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 47 of 132

06/03/2008 06/04/2008 06/05/2008 06/06/2008
06/06/2008 06/09/2008
06/09/2008 06/10/2008
06/13/2008 06/16/2008

1−3, # 2 Exhibit 1 − E−mail dated May 22, 2008 from Roberta Steele to Nancy Abell and Greg Utter, # 3 Exhibit 2 − E.D. Michigan Notice of Electronic Filing dated May 22, 2008 for Docket #385, # 4 Exhibit 3 − E−mail dated May 28, 2008 from Nancy Abell to Roberta Steel and Greg Utter)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 06/02/2008)
397 Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Amended Expert WITNESS LIST by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 06/03/2008)
398 STIPULATION and Order Re: (1) Revised Briefing Schedule; (2) Page Limits for Class Certification Briefs; and (3) Filing of Plaintiffs' Expert Reports by Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 06/04/2008)
399 NOTICE of hearing on (354 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 211 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Strike (206 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion. Motion Hearing set for 6/30/2008 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. (MLan) (Entered: 06/05/2008)
400 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (357 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 06/06/2008)
401 Avalos Plaintiffs' Reply to Cintas' Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 06/06/2008)
402 NOTICE of hearing on (357 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 6/26/2008. Motion Hearing set for 6/30/2008 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
403 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: Revised Class Certification Briefing Schedule, Page Limits for Class Certification Briefs, and Filing of Plaintiff's Expert Reports. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. (Refer to image for additional dates)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JMos) (Entered: 06/09/2008)
404 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/10/2008)
405 MOTION to Seal (184 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Leave to File Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion to Place Documents Under Seal by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 06/13/2008)
406 MOTION TO AMEND (404 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) as to MOTION for Summary Judgment and MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment and MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation by Cintas Corporation

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 48 of 132

06/16/2008
06/16/2008
06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008

Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (O'Neill, Maureen) Modified on 6/17/2008 (CGre). [CHANGED DOCUMENT TO MOTION AND CLEANED UP ENTRY] (Entered: 06/16/2008)
407 MEMORANDUM re (404 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS)in Support of Motion to Amend REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) as to MOTION for Summary Judgment and MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment and MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (O'Neill, Maureen) Modified on 6/17/2008 (CGre). [ADDED TEXT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMENDED AND CLEANED UP ENTRY] (Entered: 06/16/2008)
408 DECLARATION by Anne Nergaard re (404 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) in support of Motion to Amend REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS)as to MOTION for Summary Judgment and MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation and REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation filed by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (O'Neill, Maureen) Modified on 6/17/2008 (CGre). [ADDED TEXT IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO AMEND AND CLEANED UP ENTRY] (Entered: 06/16/2008)
409 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation ( Objections to R&R due by 7/3/2008, Response to Objections due 7/25/2008) Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
410 ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF AVALOS'S OBJECTIONS AND ACCEPTING Report and Recommendation 328 − Granting 231 Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment with respect to Plaintiff Blanca Nelly Avalos. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
411 MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Lee, Bill) Modified on 6/27/2008 (PMil).[BANKER'S BOX RECEIVED IN FLINT CLERK'S OFFICE 6/27/08] Modified on 11/6/2008 (JCre). (Entered: 06/19/2008)
412 DECLARATION by Bill Lann Lee re (411 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
413 STIPULATION re (409 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 409 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Stipulation and Order,, Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings, Stipulation and [Proposed] Order Extending Defendant's Time to Object to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Scheer on Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Anthony Jones by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (O'Neill, Maureen) (Entered: 06/19/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 49 of 132

06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008 06/19/2008

414 DECLARATION by William G. Tishkoff re (412 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 269 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (411 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
415 APPENDIX re: (268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen. by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano Appendix of Unpublished Federal Authorities Cited in Support of Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
416 DECLARATION by Rachel Geman re (268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Declaration of Rachel Geman in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and the Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Designation as Lead Class Counsel filed by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
417 DECLARATION by James K. Fett re (412 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 269 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (271 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 414 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (411 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
418 MOTION to Certify Class Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification − Filed Under Seal Pursuant To Protective Order by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) Modified on 11/6/2008 (JCre). (Entered: 06/19/2008)
419 Memorandum In Support Of Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification− Filed Under Seal Pursuant To Protective Oder by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) Modified on 6/20/2008 (CGre). [REMOVED MOTION TO CERTIFY CLASS] (Entered: 06/19/2008)
420 DECLARATION by Jacqueline Thompson re (418 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class, (419 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Declaration Of Jacqueline Thompson In Support Of Plaintiff's Memorandum In Support Of Plaintiffs'Motion For Class Certification And Appointment of Class Counsel− Filed Under Seal Pursuant To Protective Order filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
421 DECLARATION by Roberta Steele re (420 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (418 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class, (419 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
422 DECLARATION by Sarah E. Siskind re (420 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (419 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 06/19/2008)
423 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos re (422 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (421 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (420 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Declaration, (418 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class, (419 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 50 of 132

06/20/2008 06/20/2008 06/20/2008 06/23/2008 06/23/2008 06/24/2008 06/24/2008 06/25/2008 06/26/2008
06/26/2008

06/19/2008)
424 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano re (268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 06/20/2008)
425 DECLARATION by Sarah E. Siskind re (268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 06/20/2008)
426 DECLARATION by Roberta Steele re (268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 06/20/2008)
427 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (411 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 268 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 06/23/2008)
428 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation of Subpoenas to Custodians of Records (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 6/24/2008 (BSoc). [STRICKEN] (Entered: 06/23/2008)
429 NOTICE of hearing on (596 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 450 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Counter−Motion to Strike Select Portions of Cintas' Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Class Certification by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patte. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2009 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 06/24/2008)
430 APPENDIX re: (418 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos. by Blanca Nelly Avalos Appendix of Unpublished Authorities in Support of Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Mills, Heather) (Entered: 06/24/2008)
431 STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO OBJECT TO THE (404 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 261 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation( Objections to R&R due by 7/3/2008, Responses due by 7/25/2008) Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 06/25/2008)
432 MOTION to Quash Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and Quash Thirty−Five Unauthorized Document Subpoenas Issued by Cintas to Former Employers and Schools of Absent Class Member Declarants by Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A − Motion Hearing Transcript dated April 5, 2007, # 3 Exhibit B − Subpoenas Issued by Cintas, June 23−25, 2008, # 4 Exhibit C − E−mail from Geman to Utter dated June 23, 2008, # 5 Exhibit D − E−mail from Utter to Geman dated June 24, 2008, # 6 Exhibit E − E−mail from Utter to Geman dated June 25, 2008)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (THal). (Entered: 06/26/2008)
433 ORDER in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; granting (263) Motion to Amend/Correct in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/26/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 51 of 132

06/26/2008 06/27/2008 06/27/2008
06/27/2008 06/30/2008 06/30/2008 06/30/2008 07/03/2008 07/03/2008

434 MOTION for Order Motion for Removal of Image: Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and For Leave to File Corrected Motion by Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 06/26/2008)
435 ORDER granting (434) Motion for Order in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; granting (291) Motion for Order in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (THal) (Entered: 06/27/2008)
436 MOTION to Quash Serrano and Avalos Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and Quash Thirty−One Unauthorized Document Subpoenas Issued by Cintas to Former Employers and Schools of Absent Class Member Declarants by Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A − Motion Hearing Transcript dated April 5, 2007, # 3 Exhibit B − Subpoenas Issued by Cintas, June 23−25, 2008, # 4 Exhibit C − E−mail from Geman to Utter dated June 23, 2008, # 5 Exhibit D − E−mail from Utter to Geman dated June 24, 2008, # 6 Exhibit E − E−mail from Utter to Geman dated June 25, 2008)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 06/27/2008)
437 Letter from Tishkoff and Associates Regarding Service of 411 Motion for Class Certification Filed Under Seal to Clerk's Office Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 06/30/2008)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 6/30/2008 re (354 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 211 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Strike (206 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Response to Motion, filed by Cintas Corporation before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Denied. (Tape #DAS 6/30/08) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 07/02/2008)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 6/30/2008 re (196 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 338 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Taken Under Advisement. (Tape #DAS 6/30/08) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 07/02/2008)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 6/30/2008 re (357 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 214 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Sixth Amended Complaint filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Granted. (Tape #DAS 6/30/08) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 07/02/2008)
438 RESPONSE to (293 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 436 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash Serrano and Avalos Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and Quash Thirty−One Unauthorized Document Subpoenas Issued by Cintas to Former Employers and Schools of Absent Clas filed by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/03/2008)
439 NOTICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Anthony Jones re (261 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 404 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas CorporationREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 52 of 132

07/03/2008
07/03/2008 07/09/2008
07/09/2008
07/10/2008 07/10/2008 07/14/2008 07/17/2008 07/17/2008 07/18/2008

Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation −− PLAINTIFF JONES' OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SCHEER'S JUNE 10, 2008 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION −− NOTICE OF FILING UNDER SEAL (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 07/03/2008)
440 NOTICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Anthony Jones re (439 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 296 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other) −− DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN −− NOTICE OF FILING UNDER SEAL (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 07/03/2008)
441 Declaration of Scott A. Entin Filed Under Seal Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 07/07/2008)
442 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (293 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 436 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Serrano and Avalos Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and Quash Thirty−One Unauthorized Document Subpoenas Issued by Cintas to Former Employers and Schools of Absent Class. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 07/09/2008)
443 REPLY to Response re (293 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 436 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash Serrano and Avalos Plaintiff's Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and Quash Thirty−One Unauthorized Document Subpoenas Issued by Cintas to Former Employers and Schools of Absent Clas filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 07/09/2008)
444 ORDER denying (354) Motion to Strike in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; denying (211) Motion to Strike in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 07/10/2008)
445 ORDER granting (357) Motion to Amend/Correct in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; granting (214) Motion to Amend/Correct in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 07/10/2008)
446 NOTICE of hearing on (289 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 432 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 7/25/2008 Motion Hearing set for 7/29/2008 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 07/14/2008)
447 OFFER of Judgment by Cintas Corporation [PROPOSED] JUDGMENT FOR CINTAS CORPORATION AS TO ALL INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF BLANCA NELLY AVALOS Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 07/17/2008)
448 BILL OF COSTS DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S BILL OF COSTS by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 07/17/2008)
449 APPLICATION Defendant Cintas Corporation's Notice of Ex Parte Application To Allow Defendant Additional Pages On Its Response To Plaintiff Jones' Objections To Magistrate Judge Scheer's June 10, 2008 Report and Recommendation by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Defendant Cintas Corporation's Ex Parte Application To Allow Defendant Additional Pages On Its Response To Plaintiff Jones' Objections To Magistrate Judge Scheer's June 10, 2008

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 53 of 132

07/23/2008 07/24/2008 07/28/2008 07/29/2008
07/29/2008
07/30/2008 07/31/2008 08/04/2008
08/04/2008

Report And Recommendation, # 2 Document Continuation [Proposed] Order On Defendant Cintas Corporation's Ex Parte Application To Allow Defendant Additional Pages On Its Response To Plaintiff Jones' Objections To Magistrate Judge Scheer's June 10, 2008 Report and Recommendation, # 3 Document Continuation Declaration of Stephen P. Sonnenberg In Support of Cintas' Ex Parte Application To Allow Defendant Additional Pages On Its Response)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (O'Neill, Maureen) (Entered: 07/18/2008)
450 ORDER GRANTING re (449 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 306 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Application to Exceed Page Limit filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Paul V Gadola. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 07/23/2008)
451 Defendant Cintas Corporation's Response to Plaintiff Jones' Objections to Magistrate Judge Scheer's June 10, 2008 Report and Recommendation REPORT FILED UNDER SEAL PURSUANT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 07/24/2008)
452 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 8/25/2008 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 07/28/2008)
453 REPLY to Response re (261 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 404 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas CorporationREPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re (95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 95 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 237 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of Objections to Magistrate Judge's June 10, 2008 Report and Recommendation filed by Anthony Jones. Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 7/29/2008 re (293 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Motion to Enforce Joint Scheduling Order Limiting Class Certification Discovery and Quash Thirty−One Unauthorized Document Subpoenas Issued by Cintas to Former Employers and Schools of Absent Class filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Mirna E. Serrano before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Granted (Tape #DAS 7/29/08) Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 07/29/2008)
455 PARTIAL JUDGMENT FOR CINTAS CORPORATION AS TO ALL INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS OF PLAINTIFF BLANCA NELLY AVALOS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 08/04/2008)
454 Certificate of Service re (630 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal. (CGre) (Entered: 08/01/2008)
456 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on June 30, 2008. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Karin Dains) (Number of Pages: 80) Redaction Request due 8/25/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/4/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/3/2008. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Hryshko, T) (Entered: 08/04/2008)
457 Notice of Filing Transcript. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Hryshko, T) (Entered: 08/04/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 54 of 132

08/04/2008
08/05/2008 08/05/2008 08/05/2008
08/07/2008 08/08/2008 08/08/2008 08/19/2008 08/20/2008 08/20/2008

458 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on July 29, 2008. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Karin Dains) (Number of Pages: 57) Redaction Request due 8/25/2008. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/4/2008. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/3/2008. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Hryshko, T) (Entered: 08/04/2008)
459 NOTICE by Anthony Jones re (436 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash Notice of Filing Proposed Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 08/05/2008)
460 NOTICE by Anthony Jones re (436 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Quash [Corrected] Notice of Filing Proposed Order (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Proposed Order Granting Motion to Enforce Scheduling Order and Quash Subpoenas)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 08/05/2008)
461 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation re (317 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 460 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) of Cintas Corporation's Objection to Plaintiffs' August 5, 2008 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Scheduling Order and to Quash Subpoenas (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1 − Cintas Corporation's Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Scheduling Order and to Quash Subpoenas, # 3 Exhibit 2 − 7/31/08 E−mail from Greg Utter to Rachel Geman, # 4 Exhibit 3 − 8/1/08 E−mail from Sarah Siskind to Greg Utter with Plaintiffs' attached original proposed order, # 5 Exhibit 4 − 8/1/08 E−mail from Rachael Rowe to Sarah Siskind and Rachel Geman, # 6 Exhibit 5 − 8/1/08 E−mail from Sarah Siskind to Rachael Rowe, # 7 Exhibit 6 − 8/3/08 E−mail from Sarah Siskind to Rachael Rowe, # 8 Exhibit 7 − 8/4/08 E−mail from Greg Utter to Sarah Siskind, # 9 Exhibit 8 − 8/4/08 E−mail from Sarah Siskind to Greg Utter, # 10 Exhibit 9 − 8/4/08 E−mail from Sarah Siskind to Greg Utter with Plaintiffs' attached revised proposed order, # 11 Exhibit 10 − 8/5/08 E−mail from Rachael Rowe to Sarah Siskind and Rachel Geman)Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/05/2008)
462 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 8/10/2009 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 08/07/2008)
463 MEMORANDUM re (461 in 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 318 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Cintas Corporation's Reply Memorandum in Support of Objection to Plaintiffs' August 5, 2008 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce Scheduling Order and to Quash Subpoenas by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
464 ORDER granting (436) Motion to Quash in case 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS; granting (293) Motion to Quash in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 08/08/2008)
465 SECOND NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 8/25/2008 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. ONLY LEAD COUNSEL NEED TO APPEAR. Associated Cases: 4:04−cv−40132−PVG−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (RBri) (Entered: 08/19/2008)
466 ORDER REASSIGNING CASE for Docket Efficiency from District Judge Paul V Gadola in Flint to District Judge Sean F Cox in Detroit. Signed by District Judge Bernard A Friedman. (SSch) (Entered: 08/20/2008)
467 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Cintas's Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E.

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 55 of 132

08/20/2008 08/22/2008 08/22/2008 08/22/2008 08/25/2008 08/28/2008 08/28/2008 08/28/2008 09/02/2008
09/04/2008 09/04/2008

Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Geman, Rachel) Modified on 11/6/2008 (JCre). (Entered: 08/20/2008)
468 ORDER granting (405) Motion to Seal in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (262) Motion to Seal in case 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JPur) (Entered: 08/21/2008)
469 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Avalos Plaintiffs' Sixth Amended Complaint filed by Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson, Osbaldo Mundo, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Anthony Jones against all defendants.Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 08/22/2008)
470 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Osbaldo Mundo, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson, Anthony Jones re (469 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 325 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Amended Complaint, Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 08/22/2008)
471 ORDER Vacating 427 Order of Reference Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 08/25/2008)
Minute Entry −Status Conference held on 8/25/2008 before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 08/25/2008)
472 MOTION to Withdraw Motion of Miner, Barnhill & Galland and Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Jose Picorelli by Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Mills, Heather) Modified on 11/6/2008 (JCre). (Entered: 08/28/2008)
473 DECLARATION by Heather M. Mills re (328 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Withdraw Declaration of Heather M. Mills in Support of Motion of Miner, Barnhill & Galland and Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Jose Picorelli filed by Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Mills, Heather) (Entered: 08/28/2008)
474 RESPONSE to (328 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) MOTION to Withdraw Defendant Cintas Corporation's Statement of Non−Opposition to Motion of Miner, Barnhill & Galland and Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Jose Picorelli filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 08/28/2008)
475 ERRATA Sheet re: (325 in 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS) Amended Complaint, filed by Cindy Patterson, Tanesha Davis, Jose Picorelli, Osbaldo Mundo, Anthony Jones, Aundre Graham, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer. by Blanca Nelly Avalos Errata to Plaintiffs' Sixth Amended Complaint and Certificate of Service (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Plaintiffs' Corrected Sixth Amended Complaint)Associated Cases: 4:06−cv−12311−PVG−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 09/02/2008)
476 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Individual Claims of Edward Fitch Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(ii) by Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
477 NOTICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos re (332 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Stipulation of Dismissal Notice of Withdrawl of Declarations of Edward Fitch and Jose Picorelli in Support of Their Class Certification Motion Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 09/04/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 56 of 132

09/04/2008 09/04/2008 09/04/2008 09/04/2008 09/05/2008
09/05/2008
09/05/2008

478 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation Notice of EFiling Under Seal of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes (And Supporting Documents Thereto) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
479 APPENDIX by Cintas Corporation Appendix of Unpublished Authorities Cited in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
480 APPENDIX by Cintas Corporation Appendix of Unpublished Authorities Cited in Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion to Strike the Opinion and Testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/04/2008)
481 SEALED RESPONSE re (268 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
482 SEALED ADDENDUM Notice of EFiling Under Seal And Index of Declarations In Support of Defendantn Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Part 1 of 6 Declarations: Davis; Dingler; Fadell; Gabrys; Gordley; Green, # 2 Index of Exhibits Part 2 of 6 Declarations: Griffiths; Gulbranson; Holcomb; Johnson; Jones; Juarez; Leon; lombardo; Lunsford, # 3 Index of Exhibits Part 3 of 6 Declarations: Mattison; McClain; McConnell; McKinney; O'Bryan; Paurich; Pomeroy, # 4 Index of Exhibits Part 4 of 6 Declarations: Ray, # 5 Index of Exhibits Part 5 of 6 Declarations: Post; Rios; Skogebo; Smith; Somerville; Sorrells; Stangle, # 6 Index of Exhibits Part 6 of 6 Declarations: Sterling; Thomas; Whitelaw; Wilder; Williams, C.; Williams, T.)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) Modified on 9/5/2008 (DHam). Modified on 9/5/2008 (DHam). (Entered: 09/05/2008)
483 SEALED Declaration of Nancy L. Abell in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, # 2 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, # 3 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, # 4 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 31, 32, 33, 34, # 5 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, # 6 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, # 7 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 47, 48, 49, 50, # 8 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, # 9 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, # 10 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 63, 64, 65, 66, # 11 Index of Exhibits Exhibit No. 67, # 12 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 68, 69, # 13 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 70, 71, 72, 73, # 14 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 74, 75, 76, # 15 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 77a, # 16 Index of Exhibits Exhibit No. 77b, # 17 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, # 18 Index of Exhibits Exhibit No. 77c, # 19 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, # 20 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, # 21 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, # 22 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
484 SEALED MOTION to Strike Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion to Strike the Opinion and Testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Memorandum In Support Thereof (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Declaration of Nancy L. Abell in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion to Strike the Opinion and Testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, # 2 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, # 3 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 5, 6, # 4 Index of Exhibits Exhibit No. 7, # 5 Index of Exhibits Exhibit

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 57 of 132

09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008

Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, 12)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) Modified on 11/6/2008 (JCre). (Entered: 09/05/2008)
485 SEALED [Proposed] Order Granting Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion to Strike the Testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 re (484 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION to Strike Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion to Strike the Opinion and Testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Memorandum In Support Thereof by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
486 SEALED Declaration of Heather A. Morgan in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Exhibit A, Tabs 1, 2, 3, 4, # 2 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 5, 6, # 3 Index of Exhibits Exhibit No. 7, # 4 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, # 5 Index of Exhibits Exhibit Nos. 12, 13, 14)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
487 SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Evidentiary Objections to and Motion to Strike Select Portions of Declarations Submitted in Support of Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
488 SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of Its Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes re (481 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
489 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cintas Corporation re (481 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, Proof of Service by Overnight Mail and Electronic Mail of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes (and Supporting Documents Thereto) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
490 SEALED Continuation of Exhibits to Declaration of Heather A. Morgan, Exhibit B, Tabs 1, 2, 3 re (342 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Exhibit B, Tabs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, # 2 Index of Exhibits Exhibit B, Tabs 9, 10, 11, # 3 Index of Exhibits Part B, Tabs 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, # 4 Index of Exhibits Exhibit B, Tabs 18, 19, 20, 21, 22)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
491 SEALED Continuation of Exhibits to Declaration of Heather A. Morgan in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposiiton to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of African American and Hispanic Classes, Exhibit B, Tab 23 re (342 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Exhibit B, Tab 24, # 2 Index of Exhibits Exhibit B, Tabs 25, 26, # 3 Index of Exhibits Exhibit B, Tabs 27, 28, 29)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
492 SEALED MOTION Cintas Corporation's Objections to and Motion to Strike Select Portions of Declarations Submitted in Support of Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 11/6/2008 (JCre). (Entered: 09/05/2008)
493 APPENDIX by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation of Unpublished Authorities Cited in Support of Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of Gender Classes and Appointment

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 58 of 132

09/05/2008 09/05/2008
09/05/2008
09/05/2008

of Class Counsel Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
494 APPENDIX by Cintas Corporation, Cintas Corporation (Part II) Unpublished Federal Authorities Cited in Support of Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of Gender Classes and Appointment of Class Counsel Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
495 SEALED RESPONSE re (411 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 268 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of Gender Classes and Appointment of Class Counsel (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A Declaration of Greg Utter, # 3 Exhibit 1 Declaration of Cherry, # 4 Exhibit 2 Declaration of Gordley, # 5 Exhibit 3 Letter to Kathy Baugus, # 6 Exhibit 4 Abramovich 10/3/05 Depo Excerpts, # 7 Exhibit 5 Fultz11/4/05 Depo Excerpts, # 8 Exhibit 6 Clement−Williams Depo Excerpts, # 9 Exhibit 7 Diversity Committee Meeting Minutes, # 10 Exhibit 8 RIchardson Depo Excerpts, # 11 Exhibit 9 Cintas Webpage: Company History, # 12 Exhibit 10 Cintas Webpage: Company Profile, # 13 Exhibit 11 Cintas Webpage: Cintas Business Divisions, # 14 Exhibit 12 Honnold Depo Excerpts, # 15 Exhibit 13 Ramirez Depo Excerpts, # 16 Exhibit 14 (1 of 2) Photographs, # 17 Exhibit 14 (2 of 2) Photographs, # 18 Exhibit 15 Abramovich 12/7/05 Depo Excerpts, # 19 Exhibit 16 (1 of 2) Cintas Corporate Policy, # 20 Exhibit 16 (2 of 2) Cintas Corporate Policy, # 21 Exhibit 17 Abramovich 11/1/05 Depo Excerpts, # 22 Exhibit 18 Abramovich 3/30/07 Depo Excerpts, # 23 Exhibit 19 Barrett 2/8/06 Depo Excerpts, # 24 Exhibit 20 Declaration of Seng, # 25 Exhibit 21 Declaration of Gettins, # 26 Exhibit 22 Abramovich 3/29/07 Depo Excerpts, # 27 Exhibit 23 Abramovich 4/26/07 Depo Excerpts, # 28 Exhibit 24 Alkire Depo Excerpts)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
496 SEALED EXHIBIT re (351 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 495 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 25 Local 216 Rental SSR Screening Interview Guide, # 2 Exhibit 26 Stangle Depo Excerpts, # 3 Exhibit 27 Somerville Depo Excerpts, # 4 Exhibit 28 Declaration of Ray (GM), # 5 Exhibit 29 Cooper Depo Excerpts, # 6 Exhibit 30 Declaration of Borak, # 7 Exhibit 31 Declaration of Lucas, # 8 Exhibit 32 Declaration of Stanley, # 9 Exhibit 33 Declaration of Synek, # 10 Exhibit 34 Abramovich 12/14/05 Depo Excerpts, # 11 Exhibit 35 Abramovich 11/3/05 Depo Excerpts, # 12 Exhibit 36 Barrett 12/20/05 Depo Excerpts, # 13 Exhibit 37 Feller Depo Excerpts, # 14 Exhibit 38 Dorsey Depo Excerpts, # 15 Exhibit 39 Wieleba Depo Excerpts, # 16 Exhibit 40 Abramovich 12/13/05 Depo Excerpts, # 17 Exhibit 41 Fundamentals Checklist, # 18 Exhibit 42 6/23/03 Larry Fultz Memorandum, # 19 Exhibit 43 Various SSR Hiring Profiles, # 20 Exhibit 44 SSR Hiring and Interview Guides, # 21 Exhibit 45 Route Ride Form and Must Have/Preferreds List, # 22 Exhibit 46 Instructions for Using Interview Guides, # 23 Exhibit 47 Bausano Depo Excerpts, # 24 Exhibit 48 Majewski Depo Excerpts, # 25 Exhibit 49 SSR Hiring Process, # 26 Exhibit 50 Various SSR Hiring Profiles and Route Ride Evaluation Form, # 27 Exhibit 51 EEO Sections from various corporate−level manager training materials, # 28 Exhibit 52 Fultz 12/6/05 Depo Excerpts, # 29 Exhibit 53 HR Audit Checklist, # 30 Exhibit 54 Fultz 11/2/05 Depo Excerpts, # 31 Exhibit 55 Cintas Rental Division HR Audit Checklist, # 32 Exhibit 56 Troy Depo Excerpts, # 33 Exhibit 57 McConnell Depo Excerpts, # 34 Exhibit 58 Schmersahl Depo Excerpts, # 35 Exhibit 59 Staffing System)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
497 SEALED EXHIBIT re (351 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 495 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 60 Declaration of Ferraro (1 of 2), # 2 Exhibit 60 Declaration of Ferraro (2 of 2), # 3 Exhibit 61 Declaration of Armbrester, # 4 Exhibit 62 Declaration of Lombardo, # 5 Exhibit 63 Declaration of Wieleba, # 6 Exhibit 64 Cintas Employment App/Resume of Mark Bara, # 7 Exhibit 65 Emloyment Status Notification re: David Baldwin, # 8 Exhibit 66 Davis Depo Excerpts, # 9 Exhibit 67 Declaration of Plouffe, # 10 Exhibit 68 Declaration of Edmunds, # 11 Exhibit 69

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 59 of 132

09/05/2008
09/05/2008 09/05/2008 09/05/2008
09/08/2008 09/08/2008

Declaration of Abernathy, # 12 Exhibit 70 Declaration of Leslie Jones, # 13 Exhibit 71 Declaration of Post, # 14 Exhibit 72 Declaration of Skogeba, # 15 Exhibit 73 Declaration of Marquard, # 16 Exhibit 74 Declaration of Woonten, # 17 Exhibit 75 Declaration of Galvin, # 18 Exhibit 76 Declaration of McConnell, # 19 Exhibit 77 Declaration of Green, # 20 Exhibit 78 Declaration of Graham, # 21 Exhibit 79 Declaration of Horne, # 22 Exhibit 80 Declaration of Thomas, # 23 Exhibit 81 Counterdeclaration of Ray, # 24 Exhibit 82 Declaration of Johnson, # 25 Exhibit 83 Declaration of McClain, # 26 Exhibit 84 Killingsworth 5/12/08 Depo Excerpts, # 27 Exhibit 85 Vice Depo Excerpts, # 28 Exhibit 86 Patterson Depo Excerpts, # 29 Exhibit 87 Donovan Depo Excerpts, # 30 Exhibit 88 Killingsworth 10/18/07 Depo Excerpts, # 31 Exhibit 89 Hiring Profiles and Must Hav/Preferreds Lists, # 32 Exhibit 90 (1 of 2) Excel Back up to Killingsworth Report, # 33 Exhibit 90 (2 of 2) Excel Back up to Killingsworth Report)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
498 SEALED EXHIBIT re (351 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 495 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 91 Meticulous Hiring Process Power Point, # 2 Exhibit 92 Scanlan Depo Excerpts, # 3 Exhibit 93 Skogebo Depo Excerpts, # 4 Exhibit 94 Punch−Johnson Depo Excerpts, # 5 Exhibit 95 Cuttle Depo Excerpts, # 6 Exhibit 96 County Depo Excerpts, # 7 Exhibit Hemond Depo Excerpts, # 8 Exhibit 98 Spreadsheet re: Snapshot SSR Pay Data, # 9 Exhibit 99 Allen Depo Excerpts, # 10 Exhibit 100 Marker Depo Excerpts, # 11 Exhibit 101 Buddie Depo Excerpts, # 12 Exhibit 102 Cintas' Supp. Resp. to 3/30/07 Interrogatories, # 13 Exhibit 103 Location 31 2004 SSR Applicant Flow Log, # 14 Exhibit 104 Location 690 2004 SSR Applicant Flow Log, # 15 Exhibit 105 Reeb v. Ohio Dept. of Rehab. and Corr., # 16 Exhibit 106 Bacon v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc., # 17 Exhibit 107 Bacon v. Honda of Am. Mfg., Inc., # 18 Exhibit 108 International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United States)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
499 SEALED Appendix II re (495 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 351 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
500 SEALED Appendix III re (495 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 351 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
501 SEALED Appendix I re (495 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 351 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation A Declarations of Abernathy, Armbrester, Anderson< Borak, Dixon, Edmunds and Fadell, # 2 Document Continuation Declaration of Ferraro, # 3 Document Continuation Declarations of Galvin, Gettins, Gordley, Graham, Green, Horne, Johnson, L. Jones and S. Jones, # 4 Document Continuation Declarations of Kemen, Leon, Lombardo, Lucas, Marquard, McClain, McConnell and McKinney, # 5 Document Continuation Declarations of O'Bryan, Plouffe, Polo, Pomeroy, Post, Seng, Skogebo, Sorrells and Stanley, # 6 Document Continuation Declaration of Ray, # 7 Document Continuation Declarations of Synek, Thomas, Whitelaw, Wieleba, C. Williams, T. Williams and Woonten)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/05/2008)
502 ORDER withdrawing (200) Motion for Order in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; withdrawing (58) Motion for Order in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 09/08/2008)
503 SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Request for Judicial Notice in Support of its Opposition to Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification of Gender Classes and Appointment of Counsel re (495 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 351 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A Court records re: Linda Allen's criminal record, # 3 Exhibit B Court records re: Kimberly Cuttle's criminal record, # 4

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 60 of 132

09/08/2008
09/10/2008 09/11/2008 09/12/2008 09/12/2008 09/12/2008 09/19/2008 10/07/2008
10/07/2008 10/07/2008

Exhibit C Court records re: Lori Woodyard's motor vehicle violations)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/08/2008)
504 RESPONSE to (467 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 323 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Cintas's Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A O'Donnell v. Michael's Family Restaurant, Inc., # 3 Exhibit B McKnight v. Gates, # 4 Exhibit C McKnight v. Gates)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/08/2008)
505 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses Defendant Cintas Corporation's Answer to Avalos Plaintiffs' Sixth Amended Complaint by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 09/10/2008)
506 REPLY to Response re (467 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 323 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Cintas's Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 09/11/2008)
507 SEALED NOTICE OF ERRATA TO DECLARATION OF KRISTY GORDLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S OPPOSITION TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION OF AFRICAN AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES re (482 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 338 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Addendum,,,, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/12/2008)
508 SEALED DECLARATION OF KRISTY GORDLEY IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S OPPOSITION TO CLASS CERTIFICATION re (482 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 338 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Addendum,,,, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/12/2008)
509 ORDER Vacating (339 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 197 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Order Referring Motion to Magistrate Judge,. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DEld) (Entered: 09/12/2008)
510 STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order by Mirna E. Serrano Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 09/19/2008)
511 ORDER Overruling re 439 Objections to Report and Recommendation filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Jose Picorelli, Osbaldo Mundo, Aundre Graham, Anthony Jones, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION, GRANTING 227 MOTION for Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment, As To Plaintiff Anthony Jones And Request For Hearing filed by Cintas Corporation, GRANTING 237 MOTION for Summary Judgment MOTION for Partial Summary Judgment filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 10/07/2008)
512 PARTIAL JUDGMENT for Cintas Corporation as to All Individual Claims of Plaintiff Anthony Jones. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (CGre) (Entered: 10/08/2008)
513 Partial Judgment for Cintas Corporation as to All Individual Claims of Plaintiff Anthony Jones Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS,

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 61 of 132

10/10/2008
10/10/2008 10/14/2008 10/15/2008 10/23/2008
10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008

2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 10/08/2008)
514 RESPONSE to (348 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Cintas Corporation's Objections to and Motion to Strike Select Portions of Declarations Submitted in Support of Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification SERRANO AND AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S OBJECTIONS TO AND MOTION TO STRIKE SELECT PORTIONS OF DECLARATIONS SUBMITTED IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/10/2008)
515 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs Opposition To Defendant Cintas Corporations Evidentiary Objections To And Motion To Strike Select Portions Of Declarations Submitted In Support Of The Avalos Plaintiffs Motion For Class Certification by Blanca Nelly Avalos. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 10/10/2008)
516 BILL OF COSTS Defendant Cintas Corporation's Bill of Costs by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 10/14/2008)
517 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: (1) WAIVING PLAINTIFF BLANCA NELLY AVALOS'S RIGHT TO APPEAL JUDGMENT AGAINST HER, AND (2) RECORDING SATISFACTION OF JUDGMENT AGAINST PLAINTIFF AVALOS IN EXCHANGE FOR HER WAIVER OF RIGHT TO APPEAL AND PAYMENT OF $1,000 IN COSTS by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 10/15/2008)
518 STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING re (275 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 418 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification − Filed Under Seal Pursuant To Protective Order, (411 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 268 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) ( Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2008 02:00 PM IN DETROIT before District Judge Sean F Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 10/23/2008)
519 STIPULATION and Order Extending Time for the Avalos Plaintiffs to File Their Class Certification Reply Brief by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
520 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis re (374 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 519 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Stipulation, and Order Extending Time for the Avalos plaintiffs to File Their Class Certification Reply Brief Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
521 SEALED REPLY to Response re (411 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 268 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Motion to Certify Class, Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1 Application of Serrano, # 3 Exhibit 2 Serrano Deposition Excerpts, # 4 Exhibit 3 Application of Allen, # 5 Exhibit 4 Shiffer Deposition Excerpts, # 6 Exhibit 5 Wilborn Deposition Excerpts, # 7 Exhibit 6 Patterson Deposition Excerpts, # 8 Exhibit 7 Graham Deposition Excerpts, # 9 Exhibit 8 Somerville Deposition Excerpts, # 10 Exhibit 9 Wieleba Deposition Excerpts, # 11 Exhibit 10 McConnell Deposition Excerpts, # 12 Exhibit 11 Stangle Deposition Excerpts, # 13 Exhibit 12 List of Must Haves, # 14 Exhibit 13 List of Ideal SSR Traits, # 15 Exhibit 14 List of Must Haves for SSR, # 16 Exhibit 15 Feller Deposition

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 62 of 132

10/24/2008
10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008

Excerpts, # 17 Exhibit 16 Serrano's Supplement Response to 2nd Interrogatories, # 18 Exhibit 17 McVay's Supplemental Responses to 2nd Interrogatories, # 19 Exhibit 18 McVay Deposition Excerpts, # 20 Exhibit 19 Baker Deposition Excerpts, # 21 Exhibit 20 Letter from Geier to Bird, # 22 Exhibit 21 Donovan Deposition Excerpts, # 23 Exhibit 22 Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Confirm, # 24 Exhibit 23 Senter v Gen. Motors, # 25 Exhibit 24 Teamsters v United States, # 26 Exhibit 25 Watson v Fort Worth, # 27 Exhibit 26 Dukes v Wal−Mart, # 28 Exhibit 27 Reeb v Ohio, # 29 Exhibit 28 Bacon v Honda, # 30 Exhibit 29 Lunsford Deposition Excerpts)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
522 SEALED Declaration of Allison Elgart in Support of Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel re (521 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion,,,,,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A Hiring Data for the Seven Locations, # 3 Exhibit B Chart of Cintas' Declarants, # 4 Exhibit C Comparators Chart, # 5 Exhibit D Facilities Chart, # 6 Exhibit E Hired Males Chart, # 7 Exhibit F Five Exemplars of Hired Males, # 8 Exhibit G Personal Protective Order, # 9 Exhibit H Michigan State Criminal History Record, # 10 Exhibit I Accurint's State Felony and Misdemeanor Records Search)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
523 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 1 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 2, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 3, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 4, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 5)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
524 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (702 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 552 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Production of Plaintiff−Intervenor's Documents and Responses to Defendant's Discovery Requests, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
525 SEALED REPLY to Response re (370 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Motion to Strike, Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Avalos Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Objections to and Motion to Strike Select Portions of Declarations Submitted in Support of Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
526 SEALED REPLY to Response re (348 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Objections to and Motion to Strike Select Portions of Declarations Submitted in Support of Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
527 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 11 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 12, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 13, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 14, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 15)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
528 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 16 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn,

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 63 of 132

10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008 10/24/2008

Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 17, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 18, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 19, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 20)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
529 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 21 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 22, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 23, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 24, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 25)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
530 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 26 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 27, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 28, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 29, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 30)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
531 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 31 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 32, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 33, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 34, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 35)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
532 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 36 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 37, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 38, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 39, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 40)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
533 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 41 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 42, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 43, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 44, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 45)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
534 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 46 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 47, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 48, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 49, # 4 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 50)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
535 SEALED EXHIBIT J Part 51 Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs re (522 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 52, # 2 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 53, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 54, # 4

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 64 of 132

10/27/2008 10/28/2008 10/28/2008 10/28/2008
10/28/2008 10/28/2008 10/28/2008
10/28/2008

Document Continuation Exhibit J Part 55)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 10/24/2008)
536 ORDER GRANTING 338 MOTION for Summary Judgment on all Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan (Filed Under Seal) filed by Cintas Corporation. GRANTING 467 MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Cintas's Motion for Summary Judgment on All Claims Brought on Behalf of Class Members Applying Outside the State of Michigan filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 10/27/2008)
537 MOTION for Leave to File Instanter Reply Brief (filed under seal) by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
538 SEALED DECLARATION OF THOMAS A. DIPRETE by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
539 SEALED DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN IN SUPPORT OF AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CERTIFY AFRICAN−AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES re (275 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 418 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification − Filed Under Seal Pursuant To Protective Order by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
540 SEALED EXHIBIT 3, PARTS A−B, TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN re (539 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 393 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
541 SEALED EXHIBIT 3, PARTS C−F, TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN IN SUPPORT OF AVALOS PLAITIFFS' MOTION TO CERTIFY AFRICAN−AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES re (539 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 393 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Parts D−F)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
542 SEALED EXHIBIT 3, PARTS G−M, TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN IN SUPPORT OF AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CERTIFY AFRICAN−AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES re (539 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 393 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Parts J−L, # 2 Document Continuation Part M)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
543 SEALED EXHIBIT 3, PARTS N−S, TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN IN SUPPORT OF AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CERTIFY AFRICAN−AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES re (539 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 393 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Part R, # 2 Document Continuation Part S)Associated Cases:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 65 of 132

10/28/2008 10/28/2008 10/28/2008 10/28/2008
10/28/2008 10/28/2008 10/28/2008 11/03/2008 11/04/2008

2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
544 SEALED EXHIBIT 3, PARTS T−Z, TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN IN SUPPORT OF AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CERTIFY AFRICAN−AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES re (539 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 393 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
545 SEALED EXHIBIT −− EXHS. 4−28 TO DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN IN SUPPORT OF AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CERTIFY AFRICAN−AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES re (539 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 393 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10−25, # 2 Exhibit 26−28)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
546 SEALED REPLY to Response re (418 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Motion to Certify Class −− AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTIONT O CERTIFY AFRICAN−AMERICAN AND HISPANIC CLASSES by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
547 APPENDIX re: (546 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 400 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Cindy Patterson, Tanesha Davis, Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Aundre Graham, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer. by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson −− APPENDIX OF UNPUBLISHED AUTHORITIES FOR AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' CLASS CERTIFICATION REPLY BRIEF (Attachments: # 1 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
548 NOTICE of hearing on (328 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 472 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel. Motion Hearing set for 11/20/2008 04:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
549 DECLARATION by Lin Y. Chan re (546 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, In Support Of Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification filed by Mirna E. Serrano (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit B tab 1 to 4, # 3 Exhibit B tab 5 to 8, # 4 Exhibit B tab 9 to 10, # 5 Exhibit B tab 11 to 13, # 6 Exhibit B tab 14, # 7 Exhibit B tab 15 to 16, # 8 Exhibit B tab 17 to 19, # 9 Exhibit B tab 20)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
550 Defendant Cintas Corporation's STATEMENT of Non−Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Instanter Brief by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 10/28/2008)
551 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Anthony Jones re (513 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Judgment, (512 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 512 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Judgment, Add and Terminate Parties, (511 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order,,. Receipt No: 06450000000001752893 − Fee: $ 455 − Fee Status: Fee Paid. (Entin, Scott) (Entered: 11/03/2008)
552 Certificate of Service re (551 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 405 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal,. (BSoc) (Entered: 11/04/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 66 of 132

11/04/2008 11/04/2008 11/05/2008 11/05/2008 11/05/2008
11/05/2008
11/05/2008 11/05/2008

553 Certificate of Service re (551 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 405 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal. (CGre) (Entered: 11/04/2008)
554 SEALED MOTION Leave to File Instanter Corrected Reply Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Class Certification −− Unopposed Motion −− by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Avalos Plaintiffs' Amended Reply in Support of Motion to Certify African−American and Hispanic Classes, # 2 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 11/04/2008)
555 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation NOTICE OF EFILING UNDER SEAL OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLIANTIFF TANESHA DAVIS (AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS THERETO) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/05/2008)
556 SEALED MOTION DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/05/2008)
557 SEALED DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS re (556 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS by Cint by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/05/2008)
558 SEALED DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S SEPARATE STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS re (556 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS by Cint by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/05/2008)
559 SEALED DECLARATION OF HEATHER A. MORGAN IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS with Exhibits A, B, C, D, E (also see continuation of Exhibits next document) by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit A Continued, # 3 Exhibit B and C, # 4 Exhibit D and E)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/05/2008)
560 SEALED Continuation of Exhibits to Declaration of Heather Morgan: Exhibit F re (413 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit H, # 2 Exhibit I, # 3 Exhibit I continued, # 4 Exhibit J, # 5 Exhibit J continued, # 6 Exhibit K)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/05/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 67 of 132

11/05/2008 11/06/2008
11/06/2008 11/07/2008 11/07/2008
11/10/2008 11/13/2008

561 SEALED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS re (556 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS by Cint by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/05/2008)
562 NOTICE of hearing on (515 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 370 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Strike, (340 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION to Strike, (492 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 348 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Cintas Corporation's Objections to and Motion to Strike Select Portions of Declarations Submitted in Support of Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification. 487 Defendant's Evidentiary Objections, 488 Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice 503 Defendant's Request for Judicial Notice Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2008 09:30 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/06/2008)
Reset Deadlines as to (418 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class, (411 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal). Motion Hearing reset for 12/8/2008 09:30 AM (TIME CHANGE ONLY) before District Judge Sean F Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/06/2008)
563 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification as to the Court's October 8, 2008 Order Overruling Plaintiffs' Objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation and the Judgment Dismissing All Individual Claims of Plaintiff Anthony Jones and Supporting Memorandum of Law by Anthony Jones. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 11/07/2008)
564 SEALED RESPONSE re (484 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 340 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendant's Motion to Strike the Opinion and Testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 1 (Reskin Deposition Excerpts), # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 2 (Tetlock Deposition Excerpts), # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 3 (Bacon v. Honda), # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 4 (Bert v. AK Steel), # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 5 (In re Visa Check), # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 6 (Ellis v. Costco), # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 7 (Arnold v. Cargill), # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 8 (Huffcut and Roth))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 11/07/2008)
TEXT−ONLY ORDER Granting (408 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 554 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Leave to File Instanter Corrected Reply Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Class Certification −− Unopposed Motion −− by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer filed by Cindy Patterson, Tanesha Davis, Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Aundre Graham, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/10/2008)
565 MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Court's October 27, 2008 Order by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 11/13/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 68 of 132

11/14/2008 11/14/2008 11/14/2008 11/17/2008 11/19/2008 11/19/2008
11/20/2008 11/25/2008 11/25/2008

566 NOTICE by Mirna E. Serrano of withdrawal of Notice Of Withdrawal Of Motion Of Miner, Barnhill & Galland And Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian To Withdraw As Counsel For Plaintiff Jose Picorelli. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mills, Heather) (Entered: 11/14/2008)
567 NOTICE by Jose Picorelli of withdrawal of Notice Of Withdrawal Of Motion Of Miner, Barnhill & Galland And Goldstein, Demchak, Baller, Borgen & Dardarian To Withdraw As Counsel For Plaintiff Jose Picorelli. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Mills, Heather) (Entered: 11/14/2008)
568 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (748 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 596 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/14/2008)
TEXT−ONLY ORDER CANCELING HEARING re (328 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 472 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Withdraw as counsel filed by Mirna E. Serrano. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/17/2008)
569 NOTICE of hearing on (410 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION by Cintas Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2008 09:30 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/19/2008)
570 RESPONSE to (565 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou Avalos Plaintiffs Memorandum In Support Of And Correction To Serrano Plaintiffs Motion For Interlocutory Appeal filed by Tanesha Davis. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 11/19/2008)
571 AMENDED NOTICE of hearing on (410 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 556 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment by Cintas Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 12/8/2008 09:30 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/20/2008)
TEXT−ONLY ORDER GRANTING (391 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 537 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Leave to File Instanter Reply Brief (filed under seal) MOTION for Leave to File Instanter Reply Brief (filed under seal) filed by Cindy Patterson, Tanesha Davis, Jose Picorelli, Osbaldo Mundo, Aundre Graham, Edward Fitch, Bennita Shiffer, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Dimitri Mack. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/25/2008)
572 NOTICE RESETTING hearing on (515 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 370 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Strike Plaintiff's Opposition, (340 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION to Strike Opinion Testify of Barbara Reskin, (492 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 348 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Cintas Corporation's Objections to and Motion to Strike Select Portions of Declarations Submitted in Support of Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, (275 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 418 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification − Filed Under Seal Pursuant To Protective Order, (410 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 556 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 69 of 132

11/26/2008 11/26/2008 11/26/2008
11/26/2008 11/26/2008 11/26/2008 11/26/2008 11/26/2008

MOTION by Cintas Corporation., (411 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 268 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) (487 in Case No 04−40132) Defendant Cintas Corp's Evidentiary Objections (488 in Case No 04−40132) Defendant Cintas Corp's Request for Judicial Notice, (503 in Case No 04−40132 Defendant Cintas Corp's Request for Judicial Notice. Motion Hearing reset for 2/5/2009 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) Modified on 11/25/2008 (JHer). (Entered: 11/25/2008)
573 Ex Parte MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Reply Memorandum In Support Of Motion To Strike Proposed Testimony Of Dr. Barbara Reskin Pursuant to Federal Rule Of Evidence 702 by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
574 SEALED REPLY to Response re (340 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, Reply Memorandum in Support of Motion to Strike Proposed Testimony of Dr. Barbara Reskin Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
575 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (759 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 607 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, (760 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 608 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Determine Sufficiency of Cintas' Answer and Objections to the EEOC's Requests for Admission filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
576 SEALED RESPONSE re (556 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion, Avalos Plaintiffs Memorandum In Opposition To Defendant Cintas Corporations Motion For Summary Judgment As To Avalos Plaintiffs Cindy Patterson And Tanesha Davis Or In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis by Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
577 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (610 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 762 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
578 SEALED Avalos Plaintiffs Responses To Defendant Cintas Corporations Statement Of Material Facts Not In Dispute In Support Of Its Motion For Summary Judgment As To Avalos Plaintiffs Cindy Patterson And Tanesha Davis Or In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (576 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, by Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
579 SEALED Avalos Plaintiffs Statement Of Additional Material Facts Not In Dispute In Opposition To Defendant Cintas Corporations Motion For Summary Judgment As To Avalos Plaintiffs Cindy Patterson And Tanesha Davis Or In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (576 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, by Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
580 APPENDIX re: (576 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, filed by Cindy Patterson, Tanesha Davis. by Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson Appendix Of Unpublished Authorities For Avalos Plaintiffs Memorandum In Opposition To Defendant Cintas Corporations Motion For Summary Judgment As To Avalos Plaintiffs Cindy Patterson And Tanesha Davis Or In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1−6, # 2 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 70 of 132

12/01/2008
12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/08/2008 12/08/2008 12/08/2008 12/09/2008 12/12/2008

(Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
581 RESPONSE to (565 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 419 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 12/01/2008)
582 SEALED REPLY to Response re (410 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment as to Avalos Plaintiffs Cindy Patterson and Tanesha Davis or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Tanesha Davis by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
583 SEALED Supplemental Declaration of Heather A. Morgan in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply Brief in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment as to Avalos Plaintiffs Cindy Patterson and Tanesha Davis or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (582 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
584 SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to (1) Plaintiffs' Responses to Cintas' Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute and (2) Plaintiffs' Statement of Additional Material Facts Not in Dispute Regarding Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Avalos Plaintiffs Cindy Patterson and Tanesha Davis or in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (412 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
585 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (616 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 768 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 12/08/2008)
586 Stipulation and Order of Dismissal of Individual Claims of Jose Picorelli Pursuant to Fed R. Civ.P.41(a)(1)(ii) in the Matter of Avalos v. Cintas Corp. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 12/09/2008)
588 STIPULATION AND ORDER as to plaintiff Avalos, Waiving right to appeal judgment, and Recording Satisfaction of Judgment Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 12/12/2008)
587 ORDER granting (573) Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (427) Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DEld) (Entered: 12/10/2008)
589 REPLY to Response re (419 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 12/12/2008)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 71 of 132

12/12/2008
12/18/2008 01/05/2009 01/08/2009 01/15/2009 01/15/2009 01/21/2009 01/21/2009
01/22/2009

590 RESPONSE to (565 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 419 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 12/12/2008)
591 NOTICE by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Blanca Nelly Avalos Of Attorney's Change of Address Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 12/18/2008)
592 COSTS TAXED in amount of $0.00 against plaintiff. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 01/05/2009)
593 BILL OF COSTS Defendant Cintas Corporation's Objection to Taxed Bill of Cost Filed By Court Clerk on January 5, 2009 by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 01/08/2009)
594 BILL OF COSTS AVALOS PLAINTIFFS OBJECTION TO DEFENDANT'S OBJECTION TO TAXED BILL OF COST BY THE COURT CLERK by Anthony Jones (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 01/15/2009)
595 APPENDIX re: (594 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Bill of Costs filed by Anthony Jones. by Anthony Jones (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 to 10)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 01/15/2009)
596 SEALED MOTION Counter−Motion to Strike Select Portions of Cintas' Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Class Certification by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 01/21/2009)
597 SEALED Declaration of Sctt A. Entin in Support of Avalos Plaintiffs' Counter−Motion to Strike Select Portions of Cintas' Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Class Certification re (596 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Counter−Motion to Strike Select Portions of Cintas' Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Class Certification by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patte by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A−Summary Chart of Testimony that Plaintiffs are Moving to Strike, # 3 Exhibit B−Summary Chart of Inadmissible Legal Conclusion Testimony Plaintiffs are Moving to Strike, # 4 Exhibit C−Excerpted version of Plaintiffs' and Class Member Declarants' Hiring Data and Cintas Comparator Chart, # 5 Exhibit D−Cindy Patterson's Electronic Application)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 01/21/2009)
598 NOTICE of hearing on (565 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 419 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou MOTION for Certificate of Appealability Serrano Plaintiffs' Motion for

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 72 of 132

01/23/2009 01/26/2009 01/28/2009
01/28/2009 01/28/2009 01/28/2009 01/29/2009 01/30/2009 01/30/2009

Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) or, in the Alternative, for Entry of Final Judgment and Certification of Appeal Under F.R.C.P. 54(b), of the District Cou, (417 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 563 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Certificate of Appealability. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2009 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/22/2009)
599 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Supplemental Authority in Opposition to Class Certification (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit EXHIBIT B)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 01/23/2009)
600 ORDER granting (563) Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification as to Individual claims of Anthony Jones in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (417) Plaintiff's Motion for Rule 54(b) Certification as to Individual claims of Anthony Jones in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/26/2009)
601 NOTICE by Blanca Nelly Avalos, Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson re (430 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, −− AVALOS PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO AVALOS PLAINTIFFS CINDY PATTERSON AND TANESHA DAVIS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A −− EEOC v. Watkins Motor Lines, Inc., __ F.3d __, 2009 WL 152474 (7th Cir. Jan. 23, 2009), # 2 Exhibit B −− Wiesmueller v. Kosobucki, 513 F.3d 784 (7th Cir. 2008), # 3 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 01/28/2009)
602 SEALED RESPONSE re (450 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion, Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Counter−Motion to Strike Selected Portions of Declarations submitted by Cintas in Opposition to Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 01/28/2009)
603 SEALED APPENDIX of Controlling Authorities Cited in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Counter−Motion to Strike Selected Portions of Declarations Submitted by Cintas in Opposition to Class Certification re (602 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 01/28/2009)
604 SEALED APPENDIX of Unpublished Authorities Cited in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Counter−Motion to Strike Selected Portions of Declarations Submitted by Cintas in Opposition to Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 01/28/2009)
605 SEALED APPENDIX of Unpublished Authorities Cited in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition to Avalos Plaintiffs' Counter−Motion to Strike Selected Portions of Declarations Submitted by Cintas in Opposition to Class Certification re (602 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 01/29/2009)
606 ORDER granting (585) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (439) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/30/2009)
607 NOTICE of hearing on (596 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 450 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Counter−Motion to Strike Select Portions of Cintas' Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Class Certification by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 73 of 132

01/30/2009 01/30/2009 02/02/2009
02/05/2009
02/09/2009 02/09/2009 02/09/2009 02/09/2009

Davis, Cindy Patte. Motion Hearing set for 2/5/2009 09:00 AM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/30/2009)
608 SEALED REPLY to Response re (596 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 450 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion, Avalos Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum in Support of Their Counter−Motion to Strike Select Portions of Cintas' Declarations Submitted in Opposition to Class Certification by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 01/30/2009)
609 SEALED MOTION Leave to File Instanter Corrected Exhibit and Corrected Exhibit 2 to the Declartion o Scott A. Entin in Support of Their Motion for Class Certification re (393 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Amended Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 01/30/2009)
610 NOTICE by Osbaldo Mundo, Edward Fitch, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Jose Picorelli, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos, Blanca Nelly Avalos re (411 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal), (418 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class −− PLAINTIFFS' NOTICE OF SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTIONS FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A −− Stanich v. Travelers Indemnity Co., No. 1:06 CV 962, 2009 WL 185943 (N.D.Ohio Jan. 26, 2009), # 2 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/02/2009)
Minute Entry −Motion Hearing held on 2/5/2009 re (275 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 418 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class Avalos Plaintiffs' Motion For Class Certification − Filed Under Seal Pursuant To Protective Order filed by Blanca Nelly Avalos, (411 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 268 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) MOTION to Certify Class (filed under seal) filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen before District Judge Sean F Cox. Disposition: HELD AND CONTINUED TO 2/7/09 AT 9:00 A.M.(Court Reporter Marie Metcalf) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 02/05/2009)
611 SEALED Avalos Plaintiffs' Supplemental Submission Requested by the Court by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/09/2009)
612 SEALED Declaration of Thomas A. DiPrete re (465 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation Declaration of Thomas A. DiPrete.Part 2)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/09/2009)
613 SEALED Declaration of Scott A. Entin in Support of Avalos Plaintiffs' Supplemental Submission Requested by the Court re (465 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A−Location 447 2004 Excerpts, # 2 Exhibit B−EffDates)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/09/2009)
614 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson re (466 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, (467 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, Associated Cases:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 74 of 132

02/10/2009 02/10/2009 02/10/2009 02/10/2009 02/10/2009 02/10/2009 02/13/2009 02/13/2009
02/13/2009 03/03/2009

2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/09/2009)
615 SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Report To The Court On Allegations Raised By Plaintiffs At February 5−6, 2009 Oral Argument by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
616 SEALED Declaration of Nell Cobb In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition To Class Certification re (615 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
617 SEALED Declaration of Russell Haggie In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Oppostion To Class Certification re (615 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
618 SEALED Supplemental Declaration Of Pete Lombardo In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition To Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
619 SEALED Declaration of Roberta Merrick In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Opposition To Class Certification by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
620 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation re (615 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, Notice of EFiling Under Seal of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Report To The Court On Allegations Raised By Plaintiffs At February 5−6, 2009 Oral Argument (And Supporting Documents Thereto) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
621 SEALED Avalos Plaintiffs' Response to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Report to the Court on Allegations Raised by Plaintiffs at February 5−6, 2009 Oral Argument re (615 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/13/2009)
622 SEALED Declaration of Sarah E. Siskind re (621 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Osbaldo Mundo, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1−Excerpts from Deposition of Bennita Shiffer dated May 13, 2008, # 3 Exhibit 2−Applications for Employment of Giulio Fattore and Jeffrey Packett, # 4 Exhibit 3−Applications of Employment of Mark Harvey, Brandon Maxwell, et al., # 5 Exhibit 4−Applications for Employment of Laura Lang and Camille Wendel)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 02/13/2009)
623 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation Of Supplemental Authority: Rehearing En Banc Granted in Dukes, Et Al. v. Wal−Mart Stores, Inc. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/13/2009)
624 SEALED Revised Declaration of Allison S. Elgart In Support of Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Law in support of Motion for Class Certification and Appointment of Class Counsel re (389 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (387 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (384 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (377 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,, (378 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (390 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (386 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (385 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (379 in

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 75 of 132

03/03/2009 03/23/2009 03/31/2009
03/31/2009 04/22/2009 05/12/2009 05/12/2009 06/18/2009 06/19/2009

2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (383 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (382 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, (388 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,, by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Index of Revised Exhibits to Declaration of Allison S. Elgart in support of Serrano and Avalos Plaintiffs' Reply Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Class Certification, # 2 Exhibit Revised Exhibit C − Comparators Chart, # 3 Exhibit Revised Exhibit D − Facilities Chart, # 4 Exhibit Revised Exhibit E − Hired Males Chart, # 5 Exhibit Supplemental Exhibit J: Supplement to Hired Applications Reviewed by Plaintiffs, In Alphabetical Order By Last Name)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 03/03/2009)
625 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano, Blanca Nelly Avalos re (624 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,,,,, Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 03/03/2009)
626 ORDER granting (609) Sealed Motion to file Instanter in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (463) Sealed Motion to file Instatner in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/23/2009)
627 ORDER denying (411) Motion to Certify Class; denying (418) Motion to Certify Class; denying (484) Motion to Strike the expert report prepared by Dr. Barbara Reskin; denying (492) Cintas' Motion to strike certain portions of declarations; denying (596) Plaintiffs' motion to strike certain portions of declarations in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, and denying (268) Motion to Certify Class; (275) Motion to Certify Class denying (340) Motion to Strike the expert report prepared by Dr. Barbara Reskin; denying (348) Cintas' Motion to strike certain portions of declarations; denying (450) Plaintiffs' motion to strike certain portions of declarations in case 2:06−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) Modified on 3/31/2009 (JHer). (Entered: 03/31/2009)
628 ORDER Denying Without Prejudice (556) Sealed Motion; denying (565) Motion for Certificate of Appealability in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (410) Sealed Motion; denying (419) Motion for Certificate of Appealability in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/31/2009)
629 Order on Bill of Costs re (448 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 594 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Bill of Costs filed by Anthony Jones, (447 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 593 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Bill of Costs, filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JCre) (Entered: 04/23/2009)
630 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Anthony Jones re (483 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 629 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order,. Receipt No: 06450000000001985404 − Fee: $ 455 − Fee Status: Fee Paid. (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 05/12/2009)
631 Certificate of Service re (630 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal. (CGre) (Entered: 05/12/2009)
632 ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (630 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony Jones [Appeal Case Number 09−0101] (PPau) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
633 ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (630 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony Jones − Disposition: granting motion for leave to file as an amicus curiae, granting motion to file under seal and denying petition for leave to appeal 3/31 order denying class certification of the gender discrimination [Appeal Case Number

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 76 of 132

06/23/2009 06/23/2009 06/23/2009 06/25/2009 06/29/2009 07/07/2009 07/28/2009 08/06/2009 08/06/2009 08/10/2009
08/10/2009 08/10/2009
08/10/2009

09−0102] (NHol) (Entered: 06/19/2009)
634 Notice of Failure to Comply with ECF Policies and Procedures as to attorney Sierra R. Koch. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DeSa) (Entered: 06/23/2009)
Attorney Sierra R. Koch is discontinued from receiving Notices of Electronic Filing. Reason: No longer working for Tishkoff & Associates PLLC. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Brant, Jennifer) (Entered: 06/23/2009)
635 ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (630 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony Jones − Disposition: dismissed for want of prosecution [Appeal Case Number 09−1674] (ATee) (Entered: 06/23/2009)
636 ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (630 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony Jones − Disposition: motion to reinstate the case is granted [Appeal Case Number 09−1674] (DeSa) (Entered: 06/25/2009)
637 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 8/10/2009 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 06/29/2009)
638 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Sierra R. Koch re (634 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 488 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Failure to Comply with ECF Policies and Procedures Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (PMil) (Entered: 07/09/2009)
639 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Stipulation and Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1: EEOC's First Amended Complaint and Jury Trial Demand) (Bird, Kenneth) Modified on 7/29/2009 (BSoc). [DOCUMENT IS AN UNSIGNED STIP AND ORDER NOT AN AMENDED COMPLAINT] (Entered: 07/28/2009)
640 JOINT STATUS CONFERENCE STATEMENT of by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
641 JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT of by Cintas Corporation, Blanca Nelly Avalos Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 08/06/2009)
642 TRANSCRIPT of motion hearing held on 09/26/07. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Karin Dains) (Number of Pages: 193) (Appeal Purposes) Redaction Request due 8/31/2009. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/10/2009. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 11/9/2009. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 08/10/2009)
643 NOTICE OF FILING transcript. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 08/10/2009)
644 ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (551 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 405 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal, filed by Anthony Jones, (630 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 484 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal filed by Anthony Jones − Disposition: motion to voluntarily dismiss appeals is granted; appeals are dismissed. [Appeal Case Number 08−2435/09−1674] (DPer) (Entered: 08/10/2009)
Minute Entry −Scheduling/StatusConference held on 8/10/2009 before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) Modified on 8/11/2009 (JHer). (Entered: 08/11/2009)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 77 of 132

08/11/2009
08/11/2009
08/11/2009 08/13/2009 08/20/2009 08/20/2009 08/21/2009 08/21/2009 08/21/2009
09/01/2009 09/29/2009 10/06/2009

645 SCHEDULING ORDER as to AVALOS PLAINTIFFS: Discovery due by 11/10/2009 Motion Cut−off set for 12/14/2009 Final Pretrial Conference set for 5/24/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox Trailing Trial Docket set for July/August 2010 Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (Refer to image for additional dates)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 08/11/2009)
646 SCHEDULING ORDER AS TO EEOC PATTERN AND PRACTICE ACTION: Discovery due by 5/10/2010 Motion Cut−off set for 6/14/2010 Final Pretrial Conference set for 11/8/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox Trailing Trial Docket set for January/February 2011 Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (Refer to image for additional dates)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 08/11/2009)
647 ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 08/11/2009)
648 STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF INDIVIDUAL CLAIMS OF JOSE PICORELLI PURSUANT TO FED.R.CIV.P. 41(a)(1)(ii) IN THE MATTER OF AVALOS V. CINTAS CORP. Jose Picorelli terminated. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (THal) (Entered: 08/14/2009)
649 STIPULATION AND ORDER on Amending Complaint of the EEOC Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
650 AMENDED (98 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Third Party Complaint by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Jury Trial Demand Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/20/2009)
651 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (647 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 500 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Order Regarding Scheduling the Claims of Private Plaintiffs in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
652 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (500 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Order Regarding Serrano Plaintiffs' Schedule filed by Mirna E. Serrano. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Proposed Order)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
653 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (647 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 500 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Order Regarding Proposed Scheduling as to Individual Claims of Plaintiffs Serrano, McVay and Allen filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Proposed Scheduling Order)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/21/2009)
654 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 09/01/2009)
655 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation re (629 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order, Notice of Satisfaction of Judgment Re: Anthony Jones Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 09/29/2009)
656 [STRICKEN]STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order re: (1) Individual Claims of Plaintiffs Aundre Graham, Dimitre Mack, Obaldo Mundo, Cindy Patterson, Bennita Shiffer and Sharon Wilborn; (2) Avalos Plaintiffs' Class Claims Alleging Race and/or National Origin Discrimination; (3) Agreement Not to Appeal the Court's March 31, 2009 Order Denying Class Certification with Respect to Race and National Origin; and (4) Cintas' Agreement Regarding Attorneys' Fees and Costs by Osbaldo Mundo, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 78 of 132

10/06/2009 10/09/2009 10/09/2009 10/21/2009 10/21/2009
10/21/2009 10/21/2009
10/22/2009 11/04/2009 11/04/2009

Davis, Cindy Patterson Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) Modified on 10/22/2009 (JHer). (Entered: 10/06/2009)
657 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Osbaldo Mundo, Dimitri Mack, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Bennita Shiffer, Aundre Graham, Tanesha Davis, Cindy Patterson re (656 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Stipulation,, Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 10/06/2009)
658 DEFENDANT CINTAS CORPORATION'S WITNESS LIST by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 10/09/2009)
659 PRELIMINARY WITNESS LIST by Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 10/09/2009)
660 MOTION for Order to Clarify Scheduling Order by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Teamsters v. United States, 431 U.S. 324 (1977))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 10/21/2009)
661 MOTION Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Michigan Rule of Professional Conduct 4.2, # 3 Exhibit Valassis v. Samuelson, 143 F.R.D. 118 (E.D. Mich. 1992), # 4 Exhibit Smith v. Kalamazoo Ophthalmology, 322 F. Supp. 2d 883 (W.D. Mich. 2004), # 5 Exhibit Perry v. City of Pontiac, 254 F.R.D. 309, 314 (E.D. Mich. 2008), # 6 Exhibit Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Inc. v. Hoss, 2009 U.S. Dist. Ct. LEXIS 22579 (E.D. Mich. 2009), # 7 Exhibit ABA Comm. on Ethics and Profl Responsibility, Formal Op. 359 (1991), # 8 Exhibit Michigan Rule of Professional Conduct 4.3, # 9 Exhibit Michigan Rule of Professional Conduct 4.4)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 10/21/2009)
662 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings With Respect to Plaintiff−Intervenor's Pattern or Practice Discrimination Claim by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/21/2009)
663 STIPULATION AND ORDER RE: 1 Individual Claims of Plaintiffs Aundre Graham, Dimitre Mack, Osbaldo Mundo, Cindy Patterson, Bennita Shiffer and Sharon Wilborn; 2 Avalos Plaintiffs' class claims alleging race and/or national origin discrimination; 3 Agreement not to appeal the Court's March 31, 2009 Order denying class certification with respect to race and national origin; and 4 Cintas' agreement regarding attorneys' fees and costs, Dimitri Mack; Osbaldo Mundo; Cindy Patterson; Bennita Shiffer; Sharon Rose Wilborn; Aundre Graham terminated. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (PMil) (Entered: 10/26/2009)
TEXT−ONLY ORDER STRIKING FOR VIOLATION OF RULE 11 OF THE ELECTRONIC FILING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES (656 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 508 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Stipulation and Proposed order filed by Aundre Graham, Cindy Patterson, Tanesha Davis, Osbaldo Mundo, Bennita Shiffer, Sharon Rose Wilborn, Dimitri Mack. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 10/22/2009)
664 RESPONSE to (514 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit General Telephone, 446 U.S. 318, # 2 Exhibit Teamsters, 431 U.S. 324, # 3 Exhibit Monarch Machine, 737 F.2d 1444)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 11/04/2009)
665 RESPONSE to (512 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 660 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Order Clarifying Scheduling Order filed

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 79 of 132

11/04/2009
11/10/2009 11/10/2009 11/10/2009 11/10/2009 11/11/2009 11/17/2009 11/20/2009 12/01/2009 12/01/2009

by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Allison v. Citgo Petroleum Corp., # 2 Exhibit EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc.)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 11/04/2009)
666 RESPONSE to (513 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 661 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A Affidavit of Brenda V. Abramovich, # 3 Exhibit Michigan Rule of Professional Condut 4.2, # 4 Exhibit Michigan Standing Committee on Professional and Judicial Ethics, Ethics Opinion RI−120, # 5 Exhibit Victory Lane Quick Oil Change, Inc. v. Hoss)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 11/04/2009)
667 REPLY to Response re (513 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 11/10/2009)
668 REPLY to Response re (512 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Order to Clarify Scheduling Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 11/10/2009)
669 STATEMENT of Joint Statement Re: Case Evaluation Stipulation by Cintas Corporation, Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 11/10/2009)
670 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (513 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 661 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/10/2009)
671 REPLY to Response re (662 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 514 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings With Respect to Plaintiff−Intervenor's Pattern or Practice Discrimination Claim filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 11/11/2009)
672 NOTICE of hearing on (513 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 661 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 12/1/2009. Motion Hearing set for 12/3/2009 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 11/17/2009)
673 NOTICE of hearing on (662 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 514 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings With Respect to Plaintiff−Intervenor's Pattern or Practice Discrimination Claim. Motion Hearing set for 1/21/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/20/2009)
674 ORDER ESTABLISHING SCHEDULING ORDER FOR PLAINTIFFS' CAUSE OF ACTION re 653 Supplemental Brief, filed by Cintas Corporation, 652 Supplemental Brief, filed by Mirna E. Serrano. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 12/01/2009)
675 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 1/22/2010 Motion Cut−off set for 2/22/2010 Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/2/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox Trailing Trial Docket set for SEPTEMBER/OCTOBER 2010 Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (Refer to image for additional dates) (JHer) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/4/2009: # 1 Sch Order) (JHer). (Entered: 12/01/2009)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 80 of 132

12/03/2009
12/04/2009 12/04/2009 12/07/2009 12/08/2009 12/11/2009 12/11/2009 12/11/2009 12/14/2009 12/14/2009
12/14/2009

Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 12/3/2009 re (513 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 661 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Taken Under Advisement. (Tape #DAS 12/3/09) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 12/07/2009)
676 NOTICE of Correction re 675 Scheduling Order. (JHer) (Entered: 12/04/2009)
677 SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 1/22/2010 Motion Cut−off set for 2/22/2010 Final Pretrial Conference set for 8/2/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (Refer to image for additional dates) (JHer) (Entered: 12/04/2009)
678 APPLICATION Application to Withdraw as Counsel by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 12/07/2009)
679 NOTICE by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano re (678 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Application Notice to Withdraw Application to Withdraw as Counsel Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 12/08/2009)
680 APPLICATION of Lieff Cabraser to Withdraw as Counsel for Serrano Plaintiffs Mirna Serrano, Stefanie Mcvay, and Linda Allen by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geman, Rachel) (Entered: 12/11/2009)
681 APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR SERRANO PLAINTIFFS MIRNA SERRANO, STEFANIE MCVAY, AND LINDA ALLEN by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 12/11/2009)
682 APPLICATION [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR SERRANO PLAINTIFFS MIRNA SERRANO, STEFANIE MCVAY, AND LINDA ALLEN by Stephanie L. McVay, Linda D. Allen, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Lee, Bill) (Entered: 12/11/2009)
683 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation Notice of Efiling Under Seal of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis (And Supporting Documents Thereto) Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
684 SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis −− Oral Argument Requested by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits Filed Concurrently Herewith In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis, # 2 Exhibit Pete Lombardo Declaration (Part 1 of 2), # 3 Exhibit Pete Lombardo Declaration (Part 2 of 2))Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
685 SEALED EXHIBIT − Christine A. Richards In Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis (Part 1 of 5) re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 81 of 132

12/14/2009 12/14/2009 12/14/2009 12/14/2009

in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaint by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation − Christine A. Richards Declaration (Part 2 of 5), # 2 Document Continuation − Christine A. Richards Declaration (Part 3 of 5), # 3 Document Continuation − Christine A. Richards Declaration (Part 4 of 5), # 4 Document Continuation − Christine A. Richards Declaration (Part 5 of 5))Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
686 SEALED EXHIBIT − Declaration of Matthew Presendofer In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaint by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
687 SEALED EXHIBIT Declaration of Marcie Bucaro In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaint by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
688 SEALED EXHIBIT − Declaration of Judith Keigher In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaint by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
689 SEALED EXHIBIT − Declaration of Heather A. Morgan In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis (Part 1 of 8) re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 82 of 132

12/14/2009 12/14/2009 12/14/2009
12/14/2009
12/15/2009

in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaint by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation − Heather A. Morgan Declaration (Part 2 of 8), # 2 Document Continuation − Heather A. Morgan Declaration (Part 3 of 8))Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
690 SEALED EXHIBIT − Heather A. Morgan Declaration (Part 4 of 8) re (538 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Document Continuation − Heather A. Morgan Declaration (Part 5 of 8), # 2 Document Continuation − Heather A. Morgan Declaration (Part 6 of 8))Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
691 SEALED EXHIBIT − Heather A. Morgan Declaration (Part 7 of 8) re (538 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Exhibit,,,,, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit − Heather A. Morgan Declaration (Part 8 of 8))Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
692 APPENDIX re: (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaint filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation Appendix of Unpublished Authorities Cited In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
693 SEALED Separate Statement − Defendant Cintas Corporation's Separate Statement of Material Facts Not In Dispute In Supoort Of Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To PlaintSEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaint by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/14/2009)
694 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Stefanie McVay by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Material Facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits Appendix of Evidence, # 3 Tab 1 to Appendix of Evidence, # 4 Tab 2 Appendix of Evidence, # 5 Tab 3 to Appendix of Evidence, # 6 Tab 4 to Appendix of Evidence, # 7 Tab 5 to Appendix of Evidence, # 8 Tab 6 to Appendix of Evidence, # 9 Tab 7 to Appendix of Evidence, # 10 Tab 8 to Appendix of Evidence)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 12/15/2009)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 83 of 132

12/16/2009 12/21/2009 12/21/2009 12/21/2009 12/23/2009 12/31/2009 01/06/2010 01/06/2010 01/07/2010 01/11/2010

695 RESPONSE to Application of Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson, PC and Lieff Cabraser Heimann & Bernstein LLC to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiffs Mirna Serrano, Linda Allen and Stefanie McVay filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 12/16/2009)
696 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Briefing. Set Motion Deadlines/Hearings as to (684 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (532 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) :( Responses due by 1/25/2010, Replies due by 2/8/2010) Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 12/21/2009)
697 ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL FOR SERRANO PLAINITFF'S MIRNA SERRANO, STEFANIE MCVAY AND LINDA ALLEN re (527 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Application filed by Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen., Attorney Rachel J. Geman, Kelly M. Dermody and Allison S. Elgart terminated. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (PMil) (Entered: 12/21/2009)
699 ORDER re (680 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 529 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Application, filed by Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson, P.C. as to Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano, Linda D. Allen, Attorney Bill Lann Lee and Nina Wasow terminated. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (PMil) (Entered: 12/24/2009)
698 ORDER granting in part and denying in part (661) Motion for Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting in part and denying in part (513) Motion for Leave to Interview Former Decision Makers Outside the Presence of Defense Counsel in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 12/23/2009)
700 STIPULATION Extending Briefing Schedule Related To Motion For Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff McVay by Stephanie L. McVay Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Brant, Jennifer) (Entered: 12/31/2009)
701 ORDER Extending Deadlines as to (694 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 543 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Stefanie McVay :( Responses due by 1/26/2010, Replies due by 2/9/2010) Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/06/2010)
702 MOTION to Compel Production of Plaintiff−Intervenor's Documents and Responses to Defendant's Discovery Requests, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F, # 8 Exhibit G, # 9 Exhibit H, # 10 Exhibit I, # 11 Exhibit J, # 12 Exhibit K)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 01/06/2010)
703 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (702 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 552 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Production of Plaintiff−Intervenor's Documents and Responses to Defendant's Discovery Requests, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/07/2010)
704 NOTICE of hearing on (702 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 552 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Production of Plaintiff−Intervenor's Documents and Responses to Defendant's Discovery Requests, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions. Resolved/Unresolved Issues

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 84 of 132

01/12/2010 01/14/2010 01/15/2010 01/15/2010 01/20/2010 01/20/2010
01/21/2010 01/21/2010
01/21/2010 01/26/2010

due by 2/2/2010. Motion Hearing set for 2/4/2010 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 01/11/2010)
705 Joint MOTION To Hear Argument on the EEOC's Motion to Clarify Scheduling Order (dkt. 660) at the Hearing Set for January 21, 2010 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/12/2010)
706 MOTION for Protective Order by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Unpublished case in support − Nix v. Sword, 2001 WL 599707 (6th Cir. 2001))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/14/2010)
Reset Deadlines as to (662 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 514 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings With Respect to Plaintiff−Intervenor's Pattern or Practice Discrimination Claim. Motion Hearing reset for 1/27/2010 02:30 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/15/2010)
707 ORDER GRANTING re (705 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 555 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Joint MOTION To Hear Argument on the EEOC's Motion to Clarify Scheduling Order (dkt. 660)( Motion Hearing set for 1/27/2010 02:30 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/15/2010)
708 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING TIME TO COMPLETE BRIEFING ON DEFENDANT'S SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION by Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 01/20/2010)
709 RESPONSE to (552 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Form Cover Letter Sent to Potential Class Members, # 2 Exhibit Correspondence from EEOC to Cintas re Potential Class Member Communications, # 3 Exhibit EEOC v. Bill Heard Chevrolet, # 4 Exhibit EEOC v. International Profit Associates, # 5 Exhibit Bauman v. Jacobs Suchard, Inc., # 6 Exhibit EEOC v. Collegeville/Imagineering Ent., # 7 Exhibit EEOC v. Carrols Corp.)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 01/20/2010)
710 NOTICE of Appearance by Aarika D. Mack−Brown on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 01/21/2010)
711 NOTICE of hearing on (706 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 556 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order, (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 684 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment (543 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 694 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment, (702 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 552 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Production of Plaintiff−Intervenor's Documents and Responses to Defendant's Discovery Requests, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions. Motion Hearing set for 3/25/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/21/2010)
712 STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Individual Claims of Plaintiff Linda D. Allen. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 01/21/2010)
713 CORRECTED NOTICE of hearing on (706 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 556 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order, (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 684 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment re (543 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 694 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Summary Judgment. Motion Hearing set for 3/25/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 85 of 132

01/27/2010 01/27/2010 01/27/2010
01/28/2010 02/04/2010 02/04/2010 02/09/2010 02/09/2010 02/09/2010 02/09/2010

2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/26/2010)
714 STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Briefing Deadlines as to (684 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION For Summary Judgment ( Responses due by 2/8/2010, Replies due by 3/3/2010) Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/27/2010)
715 REPLY to Response re (702 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 552 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Production of Plaintiff−Intervenor's Documents and Responses to Defendant's Discovery Requests, or, in the Alternative, Motion for Evidentiary Sanctions filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 01/27/2010)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 1/27/2010 re (662 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 514 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings With Respect to Plaintiff−Intervenor's Pattern or Practice Discrimination Claim filed by Cintas Corporation before District Judge Sean F Cox. Disposition: Under Advisement(Court Reporter Marie Metcalf) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 01/28/2010)
716 RESPONSE to (556 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 01/28/2010)
717 REPLY to Response re (556 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 02/04/2010)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 2/4/2010 re (552 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 702 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Taken Under Advisement. (Tape #DAS 2/4/10) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 02/04/2010)
718 SEALED RESPONSE re (684 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, −− PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS' OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT by Tanesha Davis. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
719 SEALED PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS' RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE re (542 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 693 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,,, by Tanesha Davis. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
720 SEALED DECLARATION OF THOMAS A. DIPRETE re (567 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 718 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, by Tanesha Davis. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
721 SEALED DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN re (567 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 718 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, by Tanesha Davis. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3A, # 6 Exhibit 3B, # 7 Exhibit 4, # 8 Exhibit 5A, # 9 Exhibit 5B, # 10 Index of Exhibits 6, # 11 Exhibit 7A, # 12 Exhibit 7B, # 13 Exhibit 7C, # 14 Exhibit 7D, # 15 Exhibit 7E, # 16 Exhibit 7F, # 17 Exhibit 7G, # 18 Exhibit 7H, # 19 Exhibit 8, # 20 Exhibit 9, # 21 Exhibit 10, # 22 Exhibit 11, # 23 Exhibit 12, # 24 Exhibit 13A, # 25 Exhibit 13B, # 26 Exhibit 14, # 27 Exhibit 15, # 28

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 86 of 132

02/09/2010 02/09/2010 02/09/2010 02/09/2010 02/15/2010
02/16/2010

Exhibit 16, # 29 Exhibit 17, # 30 Exhibit 18, # 31 Exhibit 19, # 32 Exhibit 20A, # 33 Exhibit 20B, # 34 Exhibit 20C, # 35 Exhibit 21, # 36 Exhibit 22, # 37 Exhibit 23A, # 38 Exhibit 23B, # 39 Exhibit 24, # 40 Exhibit 25, # 41 Exhibit 26A, # 42 Exhibit 26B, # 43 Exhibit 26C, # 44 Exhibit 27A, # 45 Exhibit 27B, # 46 Exhibit 28A, # 47 Exhibit 28B, # 48 Exhibit 28C, # 49 Exhibit 29A, # 50 Exhibit 29B, # 51 Exhibit 29C, # 52 Exhibit 30A, # 53 Exhibit 30C, # 54 Exhibit 31A, # 55 Exhibit 31B, # 56 Exhibit 31C, # 57 Exhibit 32A, # 58 Exhibit 33A, # 59 Exhibit 33B, # 60 Exhibit 34A, # 61 Exhibit 34B, # 62 Exhibit 34C, # 63 Exhibit 35A, # 64 Exhibit 35B, # 65 Exhibit 35C, # 66 Exhibit 36A, # 67 Exhibit 36B, # 68 Exhibit 37A, # 69 Exhibit 37B, # 70 Exhibit 37C, # 71 Exhibit 37D, # 72 Exhibit 37E, # 73 Exhibit 37F, # 74 Exhibit 38A, # 75 Exhibit 39A, # 76 Exhibit 39B, # 77 Exhibit 39C, # 78 Exhibit 40A, # 79 Exhibit 40B, # 80 Exhibit 41, # 81 Exhibit 42, # 82 Exhibit 43, # 83 Exhibit 44, # 84 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
722 STIPULATION AND ORDER Dismissing Individual Claims of Plaintiff Stephanie L. McVay. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
723 OPINION AND ORDER granting (662) Motion for Judgment in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (514) Motion for Judgment in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
724 OPINION AND ORDER denying (706) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (556) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
725 OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot (660) Motion for Order in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; finding as moot (512) Motion for Order in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 02/09/2010)
726 SEALED CORRECTED DECLARATION OF SCOTT A. ENTIN IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RE TANESHA DAVIS re (570 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 721 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,,,,,,, by Tanesha Davis. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3a, # 5 Exhibit 3b, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 5a, # 8 Exhibit 5b, # 9 Exhibit 6, # 10 Exhibit 7a, # 11 Exhibit 7b, # 12 Exhibit 7c, # 13 Exhibit 7d, # 14 Exhibit 7e, # 15 Exhibit 7f, # 16 Exhibit 7g, # 17 Exhibit 7h, # 18 Exhibit 8, # 19 Exhibit 9, # 20 Exhibit 10, # 21 Exhibit 11, # 22 Exhibit 12, # 23 Exhibit 13a, # 24 Exhibit 13b, # 25 Exhibit 14, # 26 Exhibit 15, # 27 Exhibit 16, # 28 Exhibit 17, # 29 Exhibit 18, # 30 Exhibit 19, # 31 Exhibit 20a, # 32 Exhibit 20b, # 33 Exhibit 20c, # 34 Exhibit 21, # 35 Exhibit 22, # 36 Exhibit 23a, # 37 Exhibit 23b, # 38 Exhibit 24, # 39 Exhibit 25, # 40 Exhibit 26a, # 41 Exhibit 26b, # 42 Exhibit 26c, # 43 Exhibit 27a, # 44 Exhibit 27b, # 45 Exhibit 28a, # 46 Exhibit 28b, # 47 Exhibit 28c, # 48 Exhibit 29a, # 49 Exhibit 29b, # 50 Exhibit 29c, # 51 Exhibit 30a, # 52 Exhibit 30b, # 53 Exhibit 31a, # 54 Exhibit 31b, # 55 Exhibit 31c, # 56 Exhibit 32, # 57 Exhibit 33a, # 58 Exhibit 33b, # 59 Exhibit 34a, # 60 Exhibit 34b, # 61 Exhibit 34c, # 62 Exhibit 35a, # 63 Exhibit 35b, # 64 Exhibit 35c, # 65 Exhibit 36a, # 66 Exhibit 36b, # 67 Exhibit 37a, # 68 Exhibit 37b, # 69 Exhibit 37c, # 70 Exhibit 37d, # 71 Exhibit 37e, # 72 Exhibit 37f, # 73 Exhibit 38, # 74 Exhibit 39a, # 75 Exhibit 39b, # 76 Exhibit 39c, # 77 Exhibit 40a, # 78 Exhibit 40b, # 79 Exhibit 41, # 80 Exhibit 42, # 81 Exhibit 43, # 82 Exhibit 44, # 83 Exhibit 45, # 84 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/15/2010)
727 SEALED PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS' CORRECTED RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT'S STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE re (719 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 568 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Tanesha Davis. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/16/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 87 of 132

02/16/2010 02/16/2010 02/17/2010 02/17/2010 02/23/2010 02/24/2010 02/24/2010
03/02/2010 03/02/2010
03/03/2010

728 MOTION to Amend/Correct to Amend Order (dkt. 723) to Add Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) along with Memorandum in Support by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/16/2010)
729 SEALED RESPONSE re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 684 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, [CORRECTED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT] by Tanesha Davis. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/16/2010)
730 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Regarding Non−Concurrence in EEOC's Motion (dkt. 728) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/17/2010)
731 MOTION Extension of Discovery by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Affidavit of Kenneth L. Bird)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 02/17/2010)
732 Joint MOTION TO EXTEND Dispositive Motion Deadline Relating to the Claims of Mirna Serrano and Cintas Corporation's Defenses by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 02/23/2010)
733 NOTICE of hearing on (579 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION Extension of Discovery, (580 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION TO EXTEND Dispositive Motion Deadline Relating to the Claims of Mirna Serrano and Cintas Corporation's Defenses. Motion Hearing set for 3/25/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 02/24/2010)
734 SEALED MOTION for Leave to Correct Citation Errors in Corrected Response to Cintas' Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute/Counterstatement of Facts and to File Instanter Amended Corrected Response/Counterstatement re (575 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Tanesha Davis. (Attachments: # 1 Plaintiff's Amended Corrected Response, # 2 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 02/24/2010)
735 ORDER granting (702) Motion to Compel in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (552) Motion to Compel in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 03/02/2010)
736 RESPONSE to (576 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 728 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct Court's February 9, 2010 Order to Add Certification Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 1−D, # 7 Exhibit 2, # 8 Exhibit 3, # 9 Exhibit 4)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/02/2010)
737 RESPONSE to (579 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 731 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION Extension of Discovery filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 1−D, # 7 Exhibit 2, # 8 Exhibit 2−A, # 9 Exhibit 2−B, # 10 Exhibit 3, # 11 Exhibit 3−A, # 12 Exhibit 3−B, # 13 Exhibit 3−C, # 14 Exhibit 3−D, # 15 Exhibit 3−E, # 16 Exhibit 3−F, # 17 Exhibit 3−G, # 18 Exhibit 3−H, # 19 Exhibit 3−I, # 20 Exhibit 3−J, # 21 Exhibit 3−K, # 22 Exhibit 3−L, # 23 Exhibit 3−M, # 24 Exhibit 3−N, # 25 Exhibit 3−O, # 26 Exhibit 3−P, # 27 Exhibit 3−Q, # 28 Exhibit 3−R, # 29 Exhibit 3−S, # 30 Exhibit 4, # 31 Exhibit 5)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/03/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 88 of 132

03/03/2010 03/03/2010 03/03/2010 03/03/2010
03/03/2010 03/03/2010 03/03/2010 03/03/2010 03/03/2010

738 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation Notice of Efiling Under Seal of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply to Plaintiff Tanesha Davis' Corrected Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Geier, Jon) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
739 SEALED REPLY to Response re (684 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, Reply of Defendant Cintas Corporation to Plaintiff Tanesha Davis' Corrected Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment or, in the Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff Tanesha Davis by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Geier, Jon) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
740 SEALED Amended and Complete Index of Exhibits Cited in Support of (1) Its Motion for Summary Judgment; and (2) its Reply to Plaintiff's Corrected Opposition to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion for Summary Judgment re (587 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Geier, Jon) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
741 SEALED Supplemental Declaration of Heather A. Morgan In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply To Plaintiff's Corrected Opposition To Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis re (587 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B − Excerpts from Depo Transcripts of T. Davis, # 3 Exhibit C − Excerpts from Depo Transcript of S. Westphal, # 4 Exhibit D − Excerpts from Depo Transcript of C. Richards, # 5 Exhibit E − Excerpts from Depo Transcript of P. Lombardo)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
742 SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis' Amended Corrected Response To Defendant's Statement of Material Facts Not In Dispute re (587 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
743 SEALED Supplemental Declaration of Matthew Presendofer In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis // with Exhibit A − Customer Data Record−−Big Lots re (587 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
744 SEALED Supplemental Declaration of Marcie Bucaro In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply To Plaintiff's Corrected Opposition To Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis // with Exhibit A − Personnel Records Maintained at Location 447 re (587 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
745 SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Objections To The Declaration Of Thomas A. DiPrete And The Corrected Declaration of Scott A. Entin Filed In Support Of Plaintiff Tanesha Davis' Corrected Opposition To Defendant's Motion For Summary Judgment re (587 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
746 APPENDIX re: (587 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation APPENDIX OF UNPUBLISHED AUTHORITIES Cited In Support Of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Reply To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis' Corrected Opposition To Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 89 of 132

03/04/2010 03/04/2010
03/11/2010 03/12/2010 03/12/2010 03/12/2010 03/12/2010 03/15/2010 03/16/2010

Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Authority: Almond v. ABB Indus. Sys. Inc., # 2 Index of Exhibits B − Authority: Doan v. NSK Corp., # 3 Exhibit C − Authority: Ferguson v. Snow, # 4 Exhibit D − Authority: Peck v. Elyria Foundry Co., # 5 Exhibit E − Authority: Smith v. Honda of Am. Mfg. Inc.)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) (Entered: 03/03/2010)
747 REPLY to Response re (576 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/04/2010)
748 MOTION for Protective Order by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A Defendants 2/15/2010 Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, # 3 Exhibit B Defendants 3/22/2007 Amended Notice of Rule 30(b)(6) deposition, # 4 Exhibit C Letter from Kenneth L. Bird to Rachael A. Rowe dated February 19, 2010, # 5 Exhibit D FTC v. U.S. Grant Resources, LLC, No. Civ. A. 04−596, 2004 WL 1444951 (E.D. La. Jun. 25, 2004), # 6 Exhibit E SEC v. Rosenfeld, No. 97 CIV. 1467 (RPP), 1997 WL 576021 (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 16, 1997), # 7 Exhibit F United States v. District Council of New York City, No. 90 CIV. 5722 (CSH), 1992 WL 208284 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 18, 1992), # 8 Exhibit EEOC v. American Intl Group, Inc., No. 93 CIV. 6390, 1994 WL 376052 (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 18, 1994), # 9 Exhibit Alloc Inc. v. Unilin Decor. N.V., No. 02−C−1266, 2006 WL 2527656 (E.D. Wis. Aug. 29, 2006))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/04/2010)
749 MOTION Continue March 25, 2010 Hearing re (581 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice of Hearing on Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 03/11/2010)
750 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (748 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 596 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
751 ORDER granting (734) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS to Correct Citation Errors ; granting (582) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS to Correct Citation Errors. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
752 OPINION AND ORDER denying (728) Motion to Amend Order to Add Certification in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying 576 Motion to Amend Order to Add Certification in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
753 ORDER in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (597) Motion to Continue March 25, 2010 Hearing in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/12/2010)
754 RESPONSE to (748 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 596 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit A, # 6 Exhibit B, # 7 Exhibit C, # 8 Exhibit D, # 9 Exhibit E, # 10 Exhibit F, # 11 Exhibit G, # 12 Exhibit H)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/15/2010)
755 NOTICE of hearing on (748 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 596 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 4/9/2010. Motion Hearing set for 4/13/2010 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 03/16/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 90 of 132

03/17/2010 03/17/2010 03/18/2010 03/19/2010
03/19/2010 03/22/2010 03/22/2010

756 EXHIBIT −− MOST RELEVANT CASE EXHIBITS TO PLAINTIFF TANESHA DAVIS' CORRECTED OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT −− re (727 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 575 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Tanesha Davis (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 03/17/2010)
757 REPLY to Response re (596 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/17/2010)
758 ORDER granting (732) Joint Motion to Extend Motion Deadline in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (580) Joint Motion to Extend Motion Deadline in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/19/2010)
759 MOTION to Compel by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit EEOC's First Requests for Production of Documents to Cintas, # 3 Exhibit Cintas' Response to EEOC's First Requests for Production of Documents, # 4 Exhibit Dec. 22 Letter Enclosing Cintas' First Doc. Production, # 5 Exhibit Jan. 28, 2010 Letter Enclosing Cintas Second Document Production in Response to the EEOCs Request for Production of Documents, # 6 Exhibit EEOCs Second Set of Interrogatories to Defendant Cintas Corp., # 7 Exhibit EEOCs Second Requests for Production of Documents to Defendant, # 8 Exhibit The EEOCs First Requests for Admission and Interrogatory to Defendant Cintas, # 9 Exhibit EEOCs February 17th Letter to Cintas Requesting Supplementation of its December 14th Discovery Response, # 10 Exhibit Cintas Corporations Objections and Responses to the EEOCs Requests for Admission and Interrogatory, # 11 Exhibit Cintas February 25, 2010 Letter in Response to the EEOCs February 17, 2010 Letter Requesting Supplementation of Cintas Discovery Responses, # 12 Exhibit Declaration of EEOC Attorney Kenneth L. Bird, # 13 Exhibit E−mails Detailing EEOCs Objection to Cintas Redaction of Identifying Information From Application Materials, # 14 Exhibit Feb. 24, 2010 Letter from Kenneth Bird to Gregory Utter Regarding Number of Interrogatories Served by EEOC, # 15 Exhibit The EEOCs First Interrogatories to Defendant, # 16 Exhibit Cintas Response to the EEOCs First Interrogatory, # 17 Exhibit Declaration of EEOC Attorney Aarika D. Mack−Brown)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 03/19/2010)
760 MOTION to Determine Sufficiency of Cintas' Answer and Objections to the EEOC's Requests for Admission by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit EEOC's First Requests for Admission and Interrogatory, # 3 Exhibit Cintas' Objections and Responses to EEOC's Requests for Admission and Interrogatory, # 4 Exhibit Declaration of Kenneth L. Bird, # 5 Exhibit Kumar v. Hilton Hotels Corp, # 6 Exhibit McBride v. Medicalodges, Inc., # 7 Exhibit Nolan, L.L.C. v. TDC Intl Corp., # 8 Exhibit Piecuch v. Gulf & Western Mfg. Co., # 9 Exhibit Visteon Corp. vs. Natl Union Fire Ins. Co.,)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 03/19/2010)
761 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (759 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 607 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, (760 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 608 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Determine Sufficiency of Cintas' Answer and Objections to the EEOC's Requests for Admission filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/22/2010)
762 MOTION for Protective Order Barring Second Depositions of Class Members by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A − Cintass Notices of depositions and Amended Notice of depositions, # 3

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 91 of 132

03/22/2010 03/22/2010 03/23/2010 03/23/2010 03/23/2010 03/23/2010
03/24/2010
03/25/2010

Exhibit B − Subpoenas for January depositions, # 4 Exhibit C − Subpoena to Velicia Crayton, # 5 Exhibit D − Deposition of Velicia Crayton, # 6 Exhibit E− Declaration of Kenneth Bird, # 7 Exhibit F − Benson v. Giordano, 2007 WL 2355783 (D.S.D. 8/17/07), # 8 Exhibit G − Beecham v. City of West Sacramento, 2008 WL 4661457 at *2−3 (E.D. Cal. 10/18/08), # 9 Exhibit H − Jones v. Cunningham, 2009 WL 3398801 (N.D. Cal. 10/20/09), # 10 Exhibit I − Kasperski v. Village of New Haven, 2009 WL 1010916 (E.D. Mich. 4/14/09), # 11 Exhibit J − Southwest Stainless, LP v. Sappington, 2008 WL 163630 (N.D. Okla. 1/16/09), # 12 Exhibit K − Stratienko v. Chattanooga−Hamilton County Hosp. Auth., 2008 WL 927860 at (E.D. Tenn. 4/4/08), # 13 Exhibit L − TBG Inc. v. Bendis, 1993 WL 831305 (D. Kan. 2/13/93))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/22/2010)
763 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (610 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 762 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/22/2010)
764 SEALED MOTION to Strike re (590 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, by Tanesha Davis. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Part 1, # 2 Exhibit A, Part 2, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Proof of Service)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 03/22/2010)
765 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Second Amended Complaint and Jury Trial Demand)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
766 ADDENDUM re (759 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 607 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
767 NOTICE Canceling Hearing re (533 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS)(684 in 2:04−40132) SEALED Defendant Cintas Corporation's Motion For Summary Judgment Or, In The Alternative, Partial Summary Judgment As To Plaintiff Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
768 MOTION to Compel Plaintiff−Intervenor to Provide Responses to Cintas' Discovery Requests, Motion for Sanctions and Request for Expedited Briefing Schedule by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit A, # 5 Exhibit B, # 6 Exhibit C, # 7 Exhibit D, # 8 Exhibit E, # 9 Exhibit F, # 10 Exhibit G, # 11 Exhibit H, # 12 Exhibit I, # 13 Exhibit J, # 14 Index of Exhibits K, # 15 Exhibit L, # 16 Exhibit M, # 17 Exhibit N−1, # 18 Exhibit N−2, # 19 Exhibit O−1, # 20 Exhibit O−2, # 21 Exhibit P)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/23/2010)
769 NOTICE of hearing on (759 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 607 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel, (610 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 762 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order, (760 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 608 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Determine Sufficiency of Cintas' Answer and Objections to the EEOC's Requests for Admission. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 4/16/2010. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2010 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 03/24/2010)
770 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (616 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 768 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 03/25/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 92 of 132

03/25/2010 03/25/2010
03/26/2010 03/29/2010 03/30/2010 03/30/2010
03/30/2010
03/31/2010 03/31/2010 04/01/2010
04/02/2010 04/02/2010

771 MOTION Remove Exhibits/Images from Public Docket and Refile Under Seal by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/25/2010)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 3/25/2010 re (579 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION Extension of Discovery filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission before District Judge Sean F Cox. Disposition: Under Advisement(Court Reporter Marie Metcalf) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) Modified on 4/15/2010 (JHer). (Entered: 03/29/2010)
772 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re (619 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION Remove Exhibits/Images from Public Docket and Refile Under Seal of Non−Opposition Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/26/2010)
773 ORDER granting (771) Motion to Remove Exhibits/Images From the Public Docket in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (619) Motion to Remove Exhibits/Images From the Public Docket in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (PMil) (Entered: 03/29/2010)
774 NOTICE of hearing on (616 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 768 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 4/16/2010. Motion Hearing set for 4/20/2010 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
775 SEALED EXHIBIT N (Parts N−I and N−2) re (768 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Plaintiff−Intervenor to Provide Responses to Cintas' Discovery Requests, Motion for Sanctions and Request for Expedited Briefing Schedule by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit N−2)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
776 SEALED EXHIBIT O (Parts O−1 and O−2) re (768 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Plaintiff−Intervenor to Provide Responses to Cintas' Discovery Requests, Motion for Sanctions and Request for Expedited Briefing Schedule by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit O−2)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/30/2010)
777 NOTICE of Appearance by Lauren G. Gibbs on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Gibbs, Lauren) (Entered: 03/31/2010)
778 MOTION Unopposed Motion to Supplement Record by Tanesha Davis. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A−Nelly Avalos Charge of Discrimination)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Siskind, Sarah) (Entered: 03/31/2010)
779 RESPONSE to (607 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Tab A − Declaration, # 2 Exhibit Ex 1 to Tab A, # 3 Exhibit Ex 2 to Tab A, # 4 Exhibit Ex 3 to Tab A, # 5 Exhibit Ex 4 to Tab A, # 6 Exhibit Tab B, # 7 Exhibit Tab C, # 8 Exhibit Tab D, # 9 Exhibit Tab E, # 10 Exhibit Tab F)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 04/01/2010)
780 MOTION to Withdraw EEOC's Motion to Determine Sufficiency of Cintas' Answers and Objections to the EEOC's Requests for Admission by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 04/02/2010)
781 RESPONSE to (616 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Discovery filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit, # 4 Exhibit, # 5 Exhibit, # 6 Exhibit, # 7 Exhibit, # 8 Exhibit, # 9 Exhibit)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 93 of 132

04/02/2010 04/02/2010 04/05/2010 04/05/2010 04/06/2010 04/07/2010
04/08/2010
04/08/2010 04/09/2010 04/09/2010 04/12/2010

(Gibbs, Lauren) (Entered: 04/02/2010)
782 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (628 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 780 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Withdraw filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 04/02/2010)
TEXT−ONLY ORDER GRANTING re (626 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 778 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION Unopposed Motion to Supplement Record filed by Tanesha Davis. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 04/02/2010)
783 ORDER denying (731) Motion to Extend Discovery in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (579) Motion to Extend Discovery in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 04/05/2010)
784 ORDER granting (684) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (533) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 04/05/2010)
785 ORDER withdrawing (760) Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Answers; granting (780) Motion to Withdraw in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; withdrawing (608) Motion to Determine the Sufficiency of Answers; granting (628) Motion to Withdraw in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/06/2010)
786 RESPONSE to (610 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order and Combined Motion for Leave to Conduct Depositions filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Tab A, # 2 Exhibit Ex 1 to Tab A, # 3 Exhibit Ex 2 to Tab A, # 4 Exhibit Tab B, # 5 Exhibit Ex 1 to Tab B, # 6 Exhibit Ex 2 to Tab B, # 7 Exhibit Ex 3 to Tab B, # 8 Exhibit Tab C, # 9 Exhibit Tab D, # 10 Exhibit Tab E, # 11 Exhibit Tab F, # 12 Exhibit Tab G, # 13 Exhibit Tab H, # 14 Exhibit Tab I)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 04/07/2010)
787 RESPONSE to (765 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 613 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 2−A, # 8 Exhibit 2−B, # 9 Exhibit 2−C, # 10 Exhibit A, # 11 Exhibit B, # 12 Exhibit C, # 13 Exhibit D, # 14 Exhibit E)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/08/2010)
788 REPLY to Response re (607 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 04/08/2010)
789 WITNESS LIST by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 04/09/2010)
790 Preliminary WITNESS LIST by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/09/2010)
791 MOTION to Strike (788 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 636 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion to Compel Cintas' Productionof Documens and Answers by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/12/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 94 of 132

04/12/2010 04/13/2010
04/13/2010 04/14/2010 04/14/2010 04/14/2010 04/14/2010 04/15/2010
04/15/2010 04/15/2010

792 REPLY to Response re (616 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 768 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel Plaintiff−Intervenor to Provide Responses to Cintas' Discovery Requests, Motion for Sanctions and Request for Expedited Briefing Schedule filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/12/2010)
793 MOTION for Order Extending By 30 Days The Deadline For Cintas To Produce Its Rebuttal Expert Report, With Request For Expedited Hearing (Requesting That The EEOC Be Ordered To Respond By April 19, 2010, And That The Motion Be Added To The April 20, 2010 Hearing Schedule Before Magistrate Judge Scheer) by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Tab A − Declaration of RAR, # 2 Exhibit Ex 1 to Tab A, # 3 Exhibit Ex 2 to Tab A)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 04/13/2010)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 4/13/2010 re (748 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 596 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion Denied. (Tape #DAS 4/13/10) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/13/2010)
794 ORDER denying (748) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (596) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/14/2010)
795 REPLY to Response re (613 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Amend/Correct filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Report of Thomas A. DiPrete analyzing the hiring of women as SSRs in Michigan (April 9, 2010))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/14/2010)
796 MOTION to Withdraw Nonconforming Reply Brief in Support of EEOC's Motion to Compel, and to Substitute Conforming Brief re (788 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Reply to Response to Motion by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Conforming Reply Brief in Support of EEOC's Motion to Compel)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 04/14/2010)
797 REPLY to Response re (610 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order Barring Second Depositions of Class Members filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/14/2010)
798 ORDER granting (796) Motion for Leave to Withdraw Nonconforming Reply Brief and for Leave to Substitute Conforming Reply Brief. in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (644) Motion for Leave to Withdraw Nonconforming Reply Brief and for Leave to Substitute Conforming Reply Brief. in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/15/2010)
799 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Entry of Judgment Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 04/15/2010)
800 RESPONSE to Dkt. 793 (Motion to extend expert report by 30 days) filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1 − Declaration of Jo Ann Farnsworth, Part 1, # 3 Exhibit 1 − Declaration of Jo Ann Farnsworth, Part 2, # 4 Exhibit 1 − Declaration of Jo Ann Farnsworth, Part 3, # 5 Exhibit 1 − Declaration of Jo Ann Farnsworth, Part 4, # 6 Exhibit 2 − Inge v. Rock Fin. Corp., 281 F.3d 613, 625 (6th Cir. 2002))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/15/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 95 of 132

04/19/2010 04/19/2010 04/19/2010 04/20/2010
04/20/2010 04/21/2010 04/21/2010 04/22/2010 04/22/2010
04/22/2010 04/22/2010 04/22/2010

Minute Entry − Telephone Conference held on 4/19/2010 before District Judge Sean F Cox. Disposition: Held − Docket Entry #793 − Motion for Order Extending by 30 Days, being referred to Magistrate Judge Scheer Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
801 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer:. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
802 NOTICE of hearing on 765 Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint. Motion Hearing set for 6/3/2010 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 04/19/2010)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 4/20/2010 re (759 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 607 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, (610 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 762 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, (616 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 768 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION to Compel filed by Cintas Corporation before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motions Taken Under Advisement. (Tape #DAS 4/20/10) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/20/2010)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 4/20/2010 re 793 Defendant's Motion to Extend before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Granted in Part. (Tape #DAS 4/20/10) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) Modified on 4/20/2010 (MLan). (Entered: 04/20/2010)
803 Supplement to WITNESS LIST by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/21/2010)
804 BILL OF COSTS with Exhibit Listing by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Itemized Costs, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Detailed Bill of Costs, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Vendor Invoices)Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 04/21/2010)
805 COSTS TAXED in the amount of $0.00 against plaintiff. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 04/22/2010)
806 ORDER granting in part and denying in part (793) Motion for Order Extending Deadline in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting in part and denying in part (641) Motion for Order Extending Deadline in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/22/2010)
807 ORDER denying (759) Motion to Compel in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (607) Motion to Compel in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/22/2010)
808 ORDER denying (762) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (610) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/22/2010)
809 ORDER granting (768) Motion to Compel in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (616) Motion to Compel in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 04/22/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 96 of 132

04/22/2010 04/27/2010 04/28/2010 04/28/2010 04/28/2010 04/28/2010 04/29/2010
04/29/2010 04/30/2010 05/03/2010
05/05/2010
05/05/2010

810 BILL OF COSTS Objection To Taxed Bill of Cost Filed By Court Clerk by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 04/22/2010)
811 MOTION for Leave to File Response to Defendant's Objection to Taxed Bill of Cost Filed by Court Clerk by Tanesha Davis. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 04/27/2010)
812 MOTION for Reconsideration re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
Attorney Elena R. Baca is discontinued from receiving Notices of Electronic Filing. Reason: no longer counsel of record. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Baca, Elena) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
Attorney Maureen E. O'Neill is discontinued from receiving Notices of Electronic Filing. Reason: no longer counsel of record. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (O'Neill, Maureen) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
Attorney Jon A. Geier is discontinued from receiving Notices of Electronic Filing. Reason: no longer counsel of record. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Geier, Jon) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
813 MOTION to Withdraw (812 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Reconsideration re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel MOTION for Reconsideration re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
814 MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Orders re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/29/2010)
815 Amended WITNESS LIST by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/30/2010)
816 MOTION for Protective Order by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Tab A, # 3 Exhibit Tab B, # 4 Exhibit Ex 1 to Tab B, # 5 Exhibit Ex 2 to Tab B, # 6 Exhibit Tab C, # 7 Exhibit Tab D, # 8 Exhibit Tab E, # 9 Exhibit Tab F, # 10 Exhibit Tab G, # 11 Exhibit Tab H, # 12 Exhibit Tab I, # 13 Exhibit Tab J, # 14 Exhibit Tab K, # 15 Exhibit Tab L, # 16 Exhibit Tab M, # 17 Exhibit Tab N, # 18 Exhibit Tab O, # 19 Exhibit Tab P, # 20 Exhibit Tab Q, # 21 Exhibit Tab R)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
817 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on April 20, 2010. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Deborah Kremlick) (Number of Pages: 76) Redaction Request due 5/26/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/7/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/3/2010. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JCha) (Entered: 05/05/2010)
818 Notice of Filing Transcript. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JCha) (Entered: 05/05/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 97 of 132

05/06/2010 05/11/2010 05/11/2010 05/12/2010 05/12/2010
05/13/2010 05/14/2010 05/14/2010 05/21/2010
05/21/2010 05/24/2010 05/24/2010

819 ORDER REFERRING MOTION to Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer: (816 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 664 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 05/06/2010)
820 NOTICE of hearing on (816 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 664 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order. Resolved/Unresolved Issues due by 5/28/2010. Motion Hearing set for 6/1/2010 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
821 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Tanesha Davis. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (Steele, Roberta) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
822 Certificate of Service re (669 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 821 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Notice of Appeal. (DWor) (Entered: 05/12/2010)
823 SEALED RESPONSE re (664 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Motion for Protective Order,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Declaration of Kenneth Bird, # 3 Exhibit 1: Excerpt from Cintass Eighteenth Supplemental Rule 26 Disclosure Statement, # 4 Exhibit 2: Excerpts from the Speech of Scott Farmer, Bates Nos. 352064, 352067, 352084, 352089, 352094−352100, # 5 Exhibit 3: http://www.cintas.com/company/corporate_profile/diversity/career_diversity.aspx (visited May 11, 2010), # 6 Marsico v. Sears Holding Corp., 2010 WL 1141005 (6th Cir. Mar. 25, 2010), # 7 Conti v. American Axle & Mfg., Inc., 326 Fed. Appx 900 (6th Cir. 2009), # 8 Devlin v. Chemed Corp., 2005 WL 2313859 (E.D. Mich. Sep. 21, 2005), # 9 El Camino Resources Ltd. v. Huntington Natl Bank, 2008 WL 4833009 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 5, 2008))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 05/12/2010)
NOTICE −− (816 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 664 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order: Motion Hearing adjourned to 6/3/2010 02:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 05/13/2010)
824 STIPULATION and [PROPOSED] ORDER by Tanesha Davis Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Miner, Judson) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
825 REPLY in Opposition to Plaintiff−Intervenor's Objections to the Court's Orders Denying EEOC's Motion to Compel and Granting Cintas' Motion to Compel by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/14/2010)
826 REPLY to Response re (662 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Orders re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Orders re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 05/21/2010)
827 ORDER granting 813 Motion to Withdraw Motion for Reconsideration and withdrawing 812 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 05/21/2010)
828 REPLY to Response re (664 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Rachael A. Rowe)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 05/24/2010)
832 STIPULATION AND ORDER for entry of judgment against plaintiff Tanesha Davis. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS,

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 98 of 132

06/02/2010 06/02/2010 06/03/2010 06/04/2010 06/10/2010 06/14/2010
06/17/2010 06/23/2010 06/25/2010

2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 06/11/2010)
Deadlines/Hearings terminated: The June 3, 2010 Motion Hearing is cancelled. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Goltz, D) (Entered: 06/02/2010)
829 OPINION AND ORDER denying (765) the EEOC's Second Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; denying (613) the EEOC's Second Motion to Amend/Correct Complaint in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Goltz, D) (Entered: 06/02/2010)
Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 6/3/2010 re (664 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 816 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Protective Order filed by Cintas Corporation before Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Disposition: Motion taken under advisement. (Tape #DAS 6/3/10) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/03/2010)
830 STIPULATED ORDER Regarding Dispositive Motion Deadlines, (Dispositive Motion Cut−off set for 7/14/2010). Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Goltz, D) (Entered: 06/04/2010)
831 ORDER granting (816) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (664) Motion for Protective Order in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (MLan) (Entered: 06/10/2010)
833 SEALED MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert, Mary Baker by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit Report of Dr. Mary Baker, # 3 Exhibit Declaration of Dr. Thomas DiPrete, # 4 Exhibit Excerpts from Baker Deposition, # 5 Exhibit Excerpts from DiPrete Report, # 6 Exhibit Declaration of Joseph R. Donovan, # 7 Exhibit Excerpts from "Use of Statistics in Equal Employment Opportunity Litigation", # 8 Exhibit Excerpts from "Statistical Proof of Discrimination")Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 06/14/2010)
834 MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Precluding Deposition re (679 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 831 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion for Protective Order, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) [DOCUMENT IS NOT A MOTION−OBJECTION ONLY] Modified on 6/18/2010 (DEld). (Entered: 06/17/2010)
835 ORDER finding as moot 811 Motion for Leave to File. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 06/23/2010)
836 MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the EEOC's Claims on Behalf of Susan Barber, Gayle Bradstrom, Christine Colfer, Gina Comiska, Kari (Denby) Kremhelmer, Tracy (Gerke) Williams, Leila (Houston) Vitale, Miranda Hurley, Robin Leach, Susan (Majewski) Harrington, Frances O'Neal, Diana Raby, Lori Schelske, Tanya Thompson and Patricia Washington by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit 1, # 4 Exhibit 2, # 5 Exhibit 3, # 6 Exhibit 4, # 7 Exhibit 4−A, # 8 Exhibit 4−B, # 9 Exhibit 4−C, # 10 Exhibit 4−D, # 11 Exhibit 4−E, # 12 Exhibit 4−F, # 13 Exhibit 4−G, # 14 Exhibit 4−H, # 15 Exhibit 4−I, # 16 Exhibit 4−J, # 17 Exhibit 4−K, # 18 Exhibit 4−L, # 19 Exhibit 4−M, # 20 Exhibit 4−N, # 21 Exhibit 4−O, # 22 Exhibit 4−P, # 23 Exhibit 4−Q, # 24 Exhibit 4−R, # 25 Exhibit 4−S, # 26 Exhibit 4−T, # 27 Exhibit 4−U, # 28 Exhibit 4−V, # 29 Exhibit 4−W, # 30 Exhibit 4−X, # 31 Exhibit 4−Y, # 32 Exhibit 4−Z, # 33 Exhibit 4−AA, # 34 Exhibit 4−BB, # 35 Exhibit 5, # 36 Exhibit 6, # 37 Exhibit 7, # 38 Exhibit 7−A, # 39 Exhibit 8, # 40 Exhibit 9, # 41 Exhibit 10, # 42 Exhibit 11, # 43 Exhibit 12, # 44 Exhibit 13, # 45 Exhibit 14, # 46 Exhibit 15)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/25/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 99 of 132

06/30/2010 06/30/2010 06/30/2010
07/01/2010 07/01/2010 07/06/2010 07/07/2010 07/07/2010 07/09/2010
07/14/2010

837 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing Under Seal of the Rebuttal Report of Mary Dunn Baker, Ph.D. in Support of Defendant Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to the EEOC's Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/30/2010)
838 SEALED Rebuttal Report of Mary Dunn Baker, Ph.D. re (837 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 684 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Notice (Other), Notice (Other) by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/30/2010)
839 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (662 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Orders re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Orders re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Aarika D. Mack−Brown)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 06/30/2010)
840 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation re (681 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 833 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert, Mary Baker by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/01/2010)
841 SEALED RESPONSE re (681 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 833 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, Cintas Corporation's Memorandum in Opposition to the EEOC's Motion to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert, Dr. Mary Dunn Baker by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/01/2010)
842 RESPONSE in Opposition to EEOC's Objection to Magistrate's Order Granting Cintas's Motion for Protective Order by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/06/2010)
843 ORDER OVERRULING re (662 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 814 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Objection to Magistrate Judge's Orders re (807 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 655 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel, (809 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 657 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion to Compel. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 07/07/2010)
844 SEALED REPLY to Response re (681 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 07/07/2010)
845 REPLY to Response re (682 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Precluding Deposition re (679 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 831 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion for Protective Order, MOTION Objection to Magistrate Judge's Order Precluding Deposition re (679 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 831 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Order on Motion for Protective Order, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 07/09/2010)
846 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing Under Seal of Motions for Summary Judgment Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 100 of 132

07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010

847 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing Under Seal Statements of Material Facts Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
848 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Tracy Gerke Williams by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 7, # 12 Exhibit 8, # 13 Exhibit 8−A, # 14 Exhibit 8−B, # 15 Exhibit 8−C, # 16 Exhibit 9, # 17 Exhibit 10, # 18 Exhibit 11, # 19 Exhibit 12, # 20 Exhibit 13, # 21 Exhibit 14)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
849 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claim Brought by EEOC on behalf of Tracy Gerke Williams re (695 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Tracy Gerke Williams by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
850 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Christine Colfer by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 7, # 12 Exhibit 8, # 13 Exhibit 8−A, # 14 Exhibit 8−B, # 15 Exhibit 8−C, # 16 Exhibit 9, # 17 Exhibit 10, # 18 Exhibit 11)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
851 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Christine Colfer re (697 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Christine Colfer by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
852 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Lori Schelske by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 7, # 12 Exhibit 7−A, # 13 Exhibit 8, # 14 Exhibit 9, # 15 Exhibit 10, # 16 Exhibit 11, # 17 Exhibit 12, # 18 Exhibit 13, # 19 Exhibit 14, # 20 Exhibit 15, # 21 Exhibit 16)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
853 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Lori Schelske re (699 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Lori Schelske by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
854 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Patricia Lee Washington by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 6−A, # 12 Exhibit 6−B, # 13 Exhibit 6−C, # 14 Exhibit 7, # 15 Exhibit 8, # 16 Exhibit 9, # 17 Exhibit 10, # 18 Exhibit 11, # 19 Exhibit 12)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
855 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Patricia Lee Washington re (701 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Patricia Lee Washington by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 101 of 132

07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010

856 SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Majewski Harrington by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 7, # 12 Exhibit 8, # 13 Exhibit 8−A, # 14 Exhibit 8−B, # 15 Exhibit 8−C, # 16 Exhibit 9, # 17 Exhibit 10, # 18 Exhibit 11)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
857 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Majewski Harrington re (703 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Majewski Harrington by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
858 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Barber by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 6−A, # 12 Exhibit 6−B, # 13 Exhibit 7, # 14 Exhibit 8, # 15 Exhibit 9, # 16 Exhibit 10, # 17 Exhibit 10−A, # 18 Exhibit 10−B, # 19 Exhibit 11, # 20 Exhibit 12)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
859 SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Gayle Bradstrom by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 7, # 12 Exhibit 8, # 13 Exhibit 9, # 14 Exhibit 9−A, # 15 Exhibit 9−B, # 16 Exhibit 9−C, # 17 Exhibit 10, # 18 Exhibit 10−A, # 19 Exhibit 10−B, # 20 Exhibit 10−C, # 21 Exhibit 11, # 22 Exhibit 12, # 23 Exhibit 13)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
860 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Barber re (705 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Barber by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
861 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claim Brought by EEOC on behalf of Gayle Bradstrom re (706 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Gayle Bradstrom by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
862 SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Robin Leach by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 5−A, # 11 Exhibit 5−B, # 12 Exhibit 6, # 13 Exhibit 7, # 14 Exhibit 8, # 15 Exhibit 9, # 16 Exhibit 10, # 17 Exhibit 11)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
863 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Robin Leach re (709 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Robin Leach by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
864 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Kari Kremhelmer by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 7, # 12

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 102 of 132

07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/14/2010

Exhibit 7−A, # 13 Exhibit 7−B, # 14 Exhibit 7−C, # 15 Exhibit 8, # 16 Exhibit 9, # 17 Exhibit 10, # 18 Exhibit 11, # 19 Exhibit 11−A, # 20 Exhibit 11−B, # 21 Exhibit 12, # 22 Exhibit 13)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
865 NOTICE of Appearance by Christy Marie Nageleisen−Blades − NOT SWORN on behalf of Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Nageleisen−Blades − NOT SWORN, Christy) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
866 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Kari Kremhelmer re (711 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Kari Kremhelmer by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
867 SEALED MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE CLAIM BROUGHT BY THE EEOC ON BEHALF OF LEILA VITALE by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits INDEX OF EXHIBITS, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 6−A, # 12 Exhibit 6−B, # 13 Exhibit 6−C, # 14 Exhibit 6−D, # 15 Exhibit 7, # 16 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Nageleisen−Blades − NOT SWORN, Christy) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
868 SEALED STATEMENT OF MATERIAL FACTS NOT IN DISPUTE IN RELATION TO CINTAS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE CLAIM BROUGHT BY THE EEOC ON BEHALF OF LEILA VITALE re (714 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION SUMMARY JUDGMENT AS TO THE CLAIM BROUGHT BY THE EEOC ON BEHALF OF LEILA VITALE by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Nageleisen−Blades − NOT SWORN, Christy) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
869 SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Diana Lee Raby by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 6−A, # 12 Exhibit 6−B, # 13 Exhibit 7, # 14 Exhibit 8, # 15 Exhibit 9, # 16 Exhibit 10, # 17 Exhibit 11, # 18 Index of Exhibits 12)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
870 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Diana Lee Raby re (716 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on behalf of Diana Lee Raby by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
871 SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Tanya Thompson by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 6−A, # 12 Exhibit 6−B, # 13 Exhibit 7, # 14 Exhibit 8, # 15 Exhibit 9, # 16 Exhibit 10, # 17 Exhibit 10−A, # 18 Exhibit 10−B, # 19 Exhibit 10−C, # 20 Exhibit 11, # 21 Exhibit 12)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
872 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Tanya Thompson re (718 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Tanya Thompson by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/14/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 103 of 132

07/14/2010 07/14/2010 07/15/2010 07/16/2010
07/21/2010 07/21/2010 07/21/2010

873 SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Gina Mary Comiska by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 1−A, # 4 Exhibit 1−B, # 5 Exhibit 1−C, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5, # 10 Exhibit 6, # 11 Exhibit 7, # 12 Exhibit 8, # 13 Exhibit 9, # 14 Exhibit 10, # 15 Exhibit 10−A, # 16 Exhibit 10−B, # 17 Exhibit 10−C, # 18 Exhibit 10−D, # 19 Exhibit 11, # 20 Exhibit 11−A, # 21 Exhibit 11−B, # 22 Exhibit 12)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
874 SEALED Statement of Material Facts Not in Dispute in Relation to Cintas' Motion for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Gina Mary Comiska re (720 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Gina Mary Comiska by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/14/2010)
875 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Cintas Corporation re (704 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, (696 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, (698 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, (702 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other,, (700 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/15/2010)
876 RESPONSE to Cintas Corporation's Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 EEOC's Counter−Statement of Disputed Facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A Certified Copy of Complaint from EEOC v. Keco Corp, # 4 Declaration of Webster N. Smith, Acting District Director, # 5 Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of Webster N. Smith − Charge No. 230−A0−0845, filed by Mirna Serrano, # 6 Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Webster N. Smith − Letter of Determination issued July 3, 2002 pertaining to Charge No. 230−A0−0845, # 7 Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of Webster N. Smith − Conciliation Agreement proposed by the EEOC to Cintas Corporation regarding Charge No. 230−A0−0845, # 8 Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of Webster N. Smith − Letter of April 14, 2005 announcing the failure of conciliation efforts regarding Charge No. 230−A0−0845, # 9 Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of Webster N. Smith − Subpoena regarding Charge No. 230−A0−0845, # 10 Excerpts from Deposition of Frances Angiano, pages 38, 183−84, 234−35, # 11 Excerpts from Deposition of Peter Morelli, pages 213−14, # 12 General Telephone Company of the Northwest., Inc. v. EEOC, 446 U.S. 318 (1980), # 13 EEOC v. Keco Industries, Inc., 748 F.2d 1097 (6th Cir. 1984), # 14 New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742 (2001), # 15 EEOC v. Cone Solvents, Inc., No. 3:04−0841, 2006 WL 1083406 (M.D. Tenn. April 21, 2006), # 16 EEOC v. Applegate Holdings, LLC, No. 5:04−CV−167, 2005 WL 1189601 (W.D. Mich. May 19, 2005), # 17 EEOC v. Mike Fink Corp., No. 3:96−0790, 1998 WL 34078445 (M.D. Tenn. July 17, 1998))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 07/16/2010)
Court Reporter Acknowledgment of Transcript Order Form received on 07/21/2010. Transcript for court proceeding held on: 2/6/2009. Payment arrangements have not been made pursuant to FRAP 10(b). Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Metcalf, M) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
877 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on 02/05/2009. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Marie Metcalf) (Number of Pages: 202) (Appeal Purposes) Redaction Request due 8/11/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/23/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/19/2010. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Metcalf, M) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
878 TRANSCRIPT of Motion Hearing held on 02/06/2009. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Marie Metcalf) (Number of Pages: 69) (Appeal Purposes) Redaction Request due 8/11/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/23/2010. Release of Transcript

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 104 of 132

07/21/2010 07/21/2010 07/21/2010 07/22/2010
07/23/2010 07/28/2010 08/04/2010
08/05/2010

Restriction set for 10/19/2010. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Metcalf, M) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
879 Notice of Filing Transcript. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS (Metcalf, M) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
880 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing Under Seal Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
881 SEALED MOTION to Dismiss All Claims of Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano with Prejudice Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit B−1, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Rowe, Rachael) (Entered: 07/21/2010)
882 NOTICE of hearing on 833 Sealed Motion to Exclude, 836 Motion for Summary Judgment, 848 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 850 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 852 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 854 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 856 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 858 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 859 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 862 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 864 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 867 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 869 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 871 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 873 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 881 Sealed Motion To Dismiss . Motion Hearing set for 9/1/2010 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. (SJa) Modified on 7/22/2010 (SJa). (Entered: 07/22/2010)
883 REPLY to Response to Defendant Cintas Corporation's Omnibus Motion for Summary Judgment as to the EEOC's Claims on Behalf of Susan Barber, Gayle Bradstrom, Christine Colfer, Gina Comiska, Kari (Denby) Kremhelmer, Tracy (Gerke) Williams, Leila (Houston) Vitale, Robin Leach, Susan (Majewski) Harrington, Diana Raby, Lori Schelske, Tanya Thompsom and Patricia Washington filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 07/23/2010)
TEXT−ONLY ORDER Adjourning Final Pretrial Conference Without Date Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 07/28/2010)
884 RESPONSE to (728 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 881 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION to Dismiss All Claims of Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano with Prejudice Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) by Cintas Corporation.SEALED MOTION to Dismiss All Claims of Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano with Prejudice Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) by Cintas Corporation. filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit ITV Direct, Inc. v. Healthy Solutions, LLC, 445 F.3d 66 (1st Cir. 2006), # 3 Exhibit Horn v. Eltra Corp., 686 F.2d 439 (6th Cir. 1982))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/04/2010)
885 SEALED RESPONSE re (859 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 706 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter Statement of Fact, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: Defendants Amended Objection and Responses and Amended Supplemental Objections and Responses to EEOCs Amended Third Set of Interrogatories, # 4 Exhibit B: Deposition Excerpts of Holly Woonton, # 5 Exhibit C: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Wyer, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Gehan Haridy, # 7 Exhibit E: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Gayle Bradstrom, # 10 Exhibit H: Application of Curtis Rybski, # 11 Exhibit I: Application of Cory Dral)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/05/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 105 of 132

08/05/2010
08/05/2010
08/05/2010 08/06/2010 08/06/2010 08/09/2010

886 SEALED RESPONSE re (703 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 856 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter Statement of Facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: Defendants Amended Objection and Responses and Amended Supplemental Objections and Responses to EEOCs Amended Third Set of Interrogatories, # 4 Exhibit B: Deposition Excerpts of Holly Woonton, # 5 Exhibit C: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Wyer, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Gehan Haridy, # 7 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Majewski Harrington, # 10 Exhibit H: Application of Ryan Hicks, # 11 Exhibit I: Application of Antwan Price, # 12 Exhibit J: Employment Agreement signed by Greg Mertens, # 13 Exhibit K: Application of Greg Mertens, # 14 Exhibit L: Resume of Greg Mertens)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/05/2010)
887 SEALED RESPONSE re (711 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 864 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter Statement of Facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Ex A: Defendants Amended Objection and Responses and Amended Supplemental Objections and Responses to EEOCs Amended Third Set of Interrogatories, # 4 Ex B: Deposition Excerpts of Holly Woonton, # 5 Ex C: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Wyer, # 6 Ex D: Deposition Excerpts of Gehan Haridy, # 7 Ex E: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 8 Ex F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Ex G: Deposition Excerpts of Kari Denby Kremhelmer, # 10 Ex H: Application of David Cunningham, # 11 Ex I: Deposition Excerpts of Kristy Gordley, # 12 Ex J: Lisa Foster, Women Veterans by the Numbers (2009))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/05/2010)
888 SEALED RESPONSE re (697 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 850 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter Statement of Facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: Defendants Amended Objection and Responses and Amended Supplemental Objections and Responses to EEOCs Amended Third Set of Interrogatories, # 4 Exhibit B: Deposition Excerpts of Holly Woonton, # 5 Exhibit C: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Wyer, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Gehan Haridy, # 7 Exhibit E: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Christine Colfer, # 10 Exhibit H: Application of Jeremy Dantzer, # 11 Exhibit I: Application of Michael Wright)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/05/2010)
889 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of Filing Under Seal Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/06/2010)
890 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re (732 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 886 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,, (885 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 731 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (734 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 888 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (887 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 733 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/06/2010)
891 SEALED RESPONSE re (709 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 862 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter statement of facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: SSR job description, # 4 Exhibit B: List of SSR hires provided during administrative investigation, # 5 Exhibit C: Excerpts from training for service managers, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Barber, # 7 Exhibit E: Deposition Excerpts of Gayle Bradstrom, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Clifton Cooper, # 10 Exhibit H: Deposition Excerpts of Ronald Farthing, # 11 Exhibit I: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 12 Exhibit J: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Gerhard, # 13 Exhibit K: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Giasson, # 14 Exhibit L: Deposition Excerpts of Kristy

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 106 of 132

08/09/2010 08/09/2010

Gordley, # 15 Exhibit M: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Harrington, # 16 Exhibit N: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Johnson, # 17 Exhibit O: Deposition Excerpts of Shari Kocsis, # 18 Exhibit P: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Kresnak, # 19 Exhibit Q: Deposition Excerpts of Marcee Kuzniak, # 20 Exhibit R: Deposition Excerpts of Yvonne LaChance, # 21 Exhibit S: Deposition Excerpts of Sheryl McMillan, # 22 Exhibit T: Deposition Excerpts of Donald Morgan, # 23 Exhibit U: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Nierzwick, # 24 Exhibit V: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Pierzchala, # 25 Exhibit W: Deposition Excerpts of Mirna Serrano, # 26 Exhibit X: Deposition Excerpts of Angela Sutton, # 27 Exhibit Y: Deposition Excerpts of Tanya Thompson, # 28 Exhibit Z: Deposition Excerpts of Kristi Clement Williams, # 29 Exhibit : Application of Robin Leach, # 30 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Robin Leach, # 31 Exhibit : Application of Jason Muck & interview sheet, # 32 Exhibit : Declaration of Kristen Foley, # 33 Exhibit : Declaration of Sol Jaffee)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
892 SEALED RESPONSE re (869 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 716 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter statement of facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: SSR job description, # 4 Exhibit B: List of SSR hires provided during administrative investigation, # 5 Exhibit C: Excerpts from training for service managers, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Barber, # 7 Exhibit E: Deposition Excerpts of Gayle Bradstrom, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Clifton Cooper, # 10 Exhibit H: Deposition Excerpts of Ronald Farthing, # 11 Exhibit I: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 12 Exhibit J: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Gerhard, # 13 Exhibit K: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Giasson, # 14 Exhibit L: Deposition Excerpts of Kristy Gordley, # 15 Exhibit M: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Harrington, # 16 Exhibit N: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Johnson, # 17 Exhibit O: Deposition Excerpts of Shari Kocsis, # 18 Exhibit P: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Kresnak, # 19 Exhibit Q: Deposition Excerpts of Marcee Kuzniak, # 20 Exhibit R: Deposition Excerpts of Yvonne LaChance, # 21 Exhibit S: Deposition Excerpts of Sheryl McMillan, # 22 Exhibit T: Deposition Excerpts of Donald Morgan, # 23 Exhibit U: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Nierzwick, # 24 Exhibit V: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Pierzchala, # 25 Exhibit W: Deposition Excerpts of Mirna Serrano, # 26 Exhibit X: Deposition Excerpts of Angela Sutton, # 27 Exhibit Y: Deposition Excerpts of Tanya Thompson, # 28 Exhibit Z: Deposition Excerpts of Kristi Clement Williams, # 29 Exhibit : EEOC v. Tobacco Superstores, Civ. No. 3:05−cv−218, 2008 WL 2328330 (E.D. Ark. June 4, 2008), # 30 Exhibit : EEOC v. Digital Connections, Civ. No. 3:05−cv−710, 2006 WL 2792219 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 26, 2006), # 31 Exhibit : EEOC v. Apria Healthcare Group, 222 F.R.D. 608 (E.D. Mo. 2004), # 32 Exhibit : Application of Diana Raby, # 33 Exhibit : Service candidate profile of Diana Raby, # 34 Exhibit : Deposition excerpts of Diana Raby, # 35 Exhibit : Application of William Hill, # 36 Exhibit : Interrogatory responses pertaining to Diana Raby, # 37 Exhibit : Declaration of Kristen Foley, # 38 Exhibit : Declaration of Sol Jaffee)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
893 SEALED RESPONSE re (871 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 718 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter statement of facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: SSR job description, # 4 Exhibit B: List of SSR hires provided during administrative investigation, # 5 Exhibit C: Excerpts from training for service managers, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Barber, # 7 Exhibit E: Deposition Excerpts of Gayle Bradstrom, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Clifton Cooper, # 10 Exhibit H: Deposition Excerpts of Ronald Farthing, # 11 Exhibit I: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 12 Exhibit J: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Gerhard, # 13 Exhibit K: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Giasson, # 14 Exhibit L: Deposition Excerpts of Kristy Gordley, # 15 Exhibit M: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Harrington, # 16 Exhibit N: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Johnson, # 17 Exhibit O: Deposition Excerpts of Shari Kocsis, # 18 Exhibit P: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Kresnak, # 19 Exhibit Q: Deposition Excerpts of Marcee Kuzniak, # 20 Exhibit R: Deposition Excerpts of Yvonne LaChance, # 21 Exhibit S: Deposition Excerpts of Sheryl McMillan, # 22 Exhibit T: Deposition Excerpts of Donald Morgan, # 23 Exhibit U: Deposition

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 107 of 132

08/09/2010 08/09/2010

Excerpts of Karen Nierzwick, # 24 Exhibit V: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Pierzchala, # 25 Exhibit W: Deposition Excerpts of Mirna Serrano, # 26 Exhibit X: Deposition Excerpts of Angela Sutton, # 27 Exhibit Y: Deposition Excerpts of Tanya Thompson, # 28 Exhibit Z: Deposition Excerpts of Kristi Clement Williams, # 29 Exhibit : Application of Tanya Thompson (2001), # 30 Exhibit : Application of Tanya Thompson (2002), # 31 Exhibit : Application of Nafal Maktari, # 32 Exhibit : Application of Josh Gilmore, # 33 Exhibit : Application of Timothy Wollner, # 34 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Kristy Gordley, # 35 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Dave Perun, # 36 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Dave Armbrester, # 37 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Bob Ferraro, # 38 Exhibit : Declaration of Kristen Foley, # 39 Exhibit : Declaration of Sol Jaffee)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
894 SEALED RESPONSE re (867 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 714 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter statement of facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: SSR job description, # 4 Exhibit B: List of SSR hires provided during administrative investigation, # 5 Exhibit C: Excerpts from training for service managers, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Barber, # 7 Exhibit E: Deposition Excerpts of Gayle Bradstrom, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Clifton Cooper, # 10 Exhibit H: Deposition Excerpts of Ronald Farthing, # 11 Exhibit I: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 12 Exhibit J: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Gerhard, # 13 Exhibit K: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Giasson, # 14 Exhibit L: Deposition Excerpts of Kristy Gordley, # 15 Exhibit M: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Harrington, # 16 Exhibit N: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Johnson, # 17 Exhibit O: Deposition Excerpts of Shari Kocsis, # 18 Exhibit P: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Kresnak, # 19 Exhibit Q: Deposition Excerpts of Marcee Kuzniak, # 20 Exhibit R: Deposition Excerpts of Yvonne LaChance, # 21 Exhibit S: Deposition Excerpts of Sheryl McMillan, # 22 Exhibit T: Deposition Excerpts of Donald Morgan, # 23 Exhibit U: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Nierzwick, # 24 Exhibit V: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Pierzchala, # 25 Exhibit W: Deposition Excerpts of Mirna Serrano, # 26 Exhibit X: Deposition Excerpts of Angela Sutton, # 27 Exhibit Y: Deposition Excerpts of Tanya Thompson, # 28 Exhibit Z: Deposition Excerpts of Kristi Clement Williams, # 29 Exhibit : Applications of Leila Vitale, # 30 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Leila Vitale (portion redacted to protect privacy interest), # 31 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Dave Perun, # 32 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Brian Delbecq, # 33 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Richard Toepel, # 34 Exhibit : Application of Bryan Hallock & route ride evaluation, # 35 Exhibit : Application of Matthew Mullen, # 36 Exhibit : Application of Steve Nicosia, # 37 Exhibit : Application of Michael OKeefe, # 38 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Matthew Hoch, # 39 Exhibit : Declaration of Kristen Foley, # 40 Exhibit : Declaration of Sol Jaffee)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
895 SEALED RESPONSE re (854 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 701 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter statement of facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: SSR job description, # 4 Exhibit B: List of SSR hires provided during administrative investigation, # 5 Exhibit C: Excerpts from training for service managers, # 6 Exhibit D: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Barber, # 7 Exhibit E: Deposition Excerpts of Gayle Bradstrom, # 8 Exhibit F: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Burgess, # 9 Exhibit G: Deposition Excerpts of Clifton Cooper, # 10 Exhibit H: Deposition Excerpts of Ronald Farthing, # 11 Exhibit I: Deposition Excerpts of Roger Farver, # 12 Exhibit J: Deposition Excerpts of Mark Gerhard, # 13 Exhibit K: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Giasson, # 14 Exhibit L: Deposition Excerpts of Kristy Gordley, # 15 Exhibit M: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Harrington, # 16 Exhibit N: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Johnson, # 17 Exhibit O: Deposition Excerpts of Shari Kocsis, # 18 Exhibit P: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Kresnak, # 19 Exhibit Q: Deposition Excerpts of Marcee Kuzniak, # 20 Exhibit R: Deposition Excerpts of Yvonne LaChance, # 21 Exhibit S: Deposition Excerpts of Sheryl McMillan, # 22 Exhibit T: Deposition Excerpts of Donald Morgan, # 23 Exhibit U: Deposition Excerpts of Karen Nierzwick, # 24 Exhibit V: Deposition Excerpts of Jennifer Pierzchala, # 25 Exhibit W: Deposition Excerpts of Mirna Serrano, # 26 Exhibit X: Deposition Excerpts of Angela Sutton, # 27 Exhibit Y: Deposition Excerpts of Tanya

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 108 of 132

08/09/2010 08/09/2010 08/09/2010
08/09/2010 08/09/2010 08/09/2010

Thompson, # 28 Exhibit Z: Deposition Excerpts of Kristi Clement Williams, # 29 Exhibit : EEOC v. Tobacco Superstores, Civ. No. 3:05−cv−218, 2008 WL 2328330 (E.D. Ark. June 4, 2008), # 30 Exhibit : EEOC v. Digital Connections, Civ. No. 3:05−cv−710, 2006 WL 2792219 (M.D. Tenn. Sept. 26, 2006), # 31 Exhibit : EEOC v. Apria Healthcare Group, 222 F.R.D. 608 (E.D. Mo. 2004), # 32 Exhibit : Application of Patricia Washington, # 33 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Patricia Washington, # 34 Exhibit : Application of Robert Koss, # 35 Exhibit : Application of David Lowe, # 36 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Dave Perun, # 37 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Brian Delbecq, # 38 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Richard Toepel, # 39 Exhibit : Deposition Excerpts of Matthew Hoch, # 40 Exhibit : Interrogatory responses pertaining to Patricia Washington, # 41 Exhibit : Declaration of Kristen Foley, # 42 Exhibit : Declaration of Sol Jaffee)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
896 SEALED RESPONSE re (852 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 699 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter statement of facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: SSR job description, # 4 Exhibit B: Excerpts from Deposition of Susan Barber, # 5 Exhibit C: Excerpts from Deposition of Lori Schelske)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
897 SEALED RESPONSE re (873 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 720 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Counter statement of facts, # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: SSR job description, # 4 Exhibit B: Excerpts from Deposition of Susan Barber, # 5 Exhibit C: Declaration of Sol Jaffee, # 6 Exhibit D: Declaration of Kristen Foley, # 7 Exhibit E: Excerpts from Deposition of Gina Comiska, # 8 Excerpts from Deposition of Dave Armbrester)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
898 SEALED RESPONSE re (695 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A: SSR Job Description, # 2 Exhibit B: Deposition Excerpts of Susan Barber, # 3 Exhibit C: Deposition Excerpts of Tracy (Gerke) Williams, # 4 Exhibit D: Application of Frank Pinter, # 5 Exhibit E: Declaration of Kirsten Foley, # 6 Exhibit F: Application and Rsum of John Flynn, # 7 Exhibit G: Declaration of Sol Jaffee, # 8 Exhibit H: Application of Christopher Neboyskey, # 9 Index of Exhibits)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
899 Certificate of Service re (914 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1070 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal. (TMcg) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
900 SEALED RESPONSE re (705 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 COUNTER−STATEMENT OF DISPUTED FACTS IN CONJUNCTION WITH EEOCS RESPONSE AS TO CLASS MEMBER SUSAN BARBER, # 3 SSR Job Description, # 4 Excerpts from Deposition of Susan Barber, # 5 Application of Darronte Scott, # 6 Declaration of Sol Jaffee, # 7 Declaration of Kirsten Foley)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
901 SEALED EXHIBIT Part 1 of 2 EEOC's Submission of Joint Exhibits Used in the Response Briefs in Opposition to Cintas's Summary Judgment Motions Regarding the 13 class members re (746 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 900 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,, (892 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 738 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, (737 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 891 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,, (734 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 888 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (745 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 899 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, (742 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 896 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, (741 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 895 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,,, (897 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 743 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 109 of 132

08/09/2010
08/10/2010 08/13/2010

Motion,, (731 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 885 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (733 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 887 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (732 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 886 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,, (744 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 898 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,, (740 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 894 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, (739 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 893 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit AA: Declaration of Beth Smith Part 1, # 2 Exhibit AA: Declaration of Beth Smith Part 2, # 3 Exhibit AA: Declaration of Beth Smith Part 3, # 4 Exhibit AA: Declaration of Beth Smith Part 4, # 5 Exhibit BB: Expert Report of Thomas A. DiPrete (April 9, 2010), # 6 Exhibit CC: Declaration of Thomas A. DiPrete (June 14, 2010))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
902 SEALED EXHIBIT Part 2 of 2 EEOC's Submission of Joint Exhibits Used in the Response Briefs in Opposition to Cintas's Summary Judgment Motions Regarding the 13 Class Members re (746 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 900 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,, (892 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 738 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, (737 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 891 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,, (734 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 888 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (745 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 899 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Document − Other, (742 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 896 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion, (741 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 895 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,,, (897 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 743 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,, (731 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 885 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (733 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 887 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (732 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 886 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,, (744 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 898 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,, (740 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 894 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, (739 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 893 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit DD: Declaration of Thomas A. DiPrete (August 2, 2010), # 2 Exhibit EE: Annual Meeting speech excerpts of CEO Scott Farmer, # 3 Exhibit FF: Deposition Excerpts of Gregory Matesa, # 4 Exhibit GG: Declaration of Tina Fileccia, # 5 Exhibit HH: Declaration of Patricia Detloff, # 6 Exhibit II: Deposition Excerpts of Brenda Abramovich, # 7 Exhibit JJ: McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973), # 8 Exhibit KK: Declaration of Susan Jeffery, # 9 Exhibit LL: Declaration of Deborah Agnew)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/09/2010)
903 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re (892 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 738 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, (740 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 894 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, (737 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 891 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,, (739 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 893 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,, (895 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 741 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,,,,,,,, Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/10/2010)
904 NOTICE by All Defendants of withdrawal of Attorney From Defendant Cintas Corporation's Counsel's Firm and As Counsel Of Record. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Morgan, Heather) Modified on 8/13/2010 (DWor). [WRONG DOCKET EVENT SELECTED] (Entered: 08/13/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 110 of 132

08/16/2010 08/17/2010 08/17/2010
08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010
08/26/2010

905 RESPONSE to (728 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) SEALED MOTION to Dismiss All Claims of Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano with Prejudice Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) by Cintas Corporation.SEALED MOTION to Dismiss All Claims of Plaintiff Mirna E. Serrano with Prejudice Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2) by Cintas Corporation. Trustee and Mirna Serrano non−opposition filed by Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Tishkoff, William) (Entered: 08/16/2010)
906 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re (925 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal. (DPer) (Entered: 08/17/2010)
907 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re (732 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 886 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,,, (885 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 731 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (734 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 888 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, (887 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 733 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Response to Motion,,, Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/17/2010)
908 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Filing Under Seal Reply Briefs Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
909 SEALED REPLY to Response re (709 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 862 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Robin Leach by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 4−A, # 7 Exhibit 5, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 7−A, # 11 Exhibit 7−B)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
910 SEALED REPLY to Response re (711 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 864 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Kari Kremhelmer by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 8−A, # 11 Exhibit 8−B, # 12 Exhibit 8−C)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
911 SEALED REPLY to Response re (859 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 706 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Gayle Bradstrom by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 9−A)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
912 SEALED REPLY to Response re (705 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 858 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Barber by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 5−A, # 8 Exhibit 5−B, # 9 Exhibit 5−C, # 10 Exhibit 5−D, # 11 Exhibit 5−E, # 12 Exhibit 6, # 13 Exhibit 6−A, # 14 Exhibit 6−B, # 15 Exhibit 7, # 16 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
913 SEALED REPLY to Response re (703 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 856 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Susan Harrington by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 9−A, # 12 Exhibit 9−B, # 13 Exhibit 9−C, # 14 Exhibit 10, # 15 Exhibit 11)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 111 of 132

08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010 08/26/2010

914 SEALED REPLY to Response re (697 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 850 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Christine Colfer by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 8−A)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
915 SEALED REPLY to Response re (848 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 695 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Tracy Gerke Williams by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 5−A, # 8 Exhibit 6, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
916 SEALED REPLY to Response re (871 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 718 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Tanya Thompson by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit 8, # 10 Exhibit 9, # 11 Exhibit 10, # 12 Exhibit 10−A, # 13 Exhibit 10−B, # 14 Exhibit 11, # 15 Exhibit 12, # 16 Exhibit 13, # 17 Exhibit 13−A, # 18 Exhibit 13−B, # 19 Exhibit 13−C, # 20 Exhibit 13−D)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
917 SEALED REPLY to Response re (869 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 716 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Diana Raby by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 5−A, # 8 Exhibit 5−B, # 9 Exhibit 5−C, # 10 Exhibit 5−D, # 11 Exhibit 6, # 12 Exhibit 7, # 13 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
918 SEALED REPLY to Response re (699 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 852 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Lori Schelske by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
919 SEALED REPLY to Response re (873 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 720 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claims Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Gina Comiska by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 6−A, # 9 Exhibit 7, # 10 Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit 9)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
920 SEALED REPLY to Response re (854 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 701 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Patricia Washington by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 6−A, # 9 Exhibit 6−B, # 10 Exhibit 7, # 11 Exhibit 8, # 12 Exhibit 9)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)
921 SEALED REPLY to Response re (867 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 714 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Sealed Motion,, for Summary Judgment as to the Claim Brought by the EEOC on Behalf of Leila Vitale by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5, # 7 Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit 6−A, # 9 Exhibit 6−B, # 10 Exhibit 6−C, # 11 Exhibit 6−D, # 12 Exhibit 6−E, # 13 Exhibit 6−F, # 14 Exhibit 7, # 15 Exhibit 7−A, # 16 Exhibit 8, # 17 Exhibit 9)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 08/26/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 112 of 132

08/27/2010
09/03/2010 09/03/2010 09/03/2010 09/03/2010 09/03/2010 09/03/2010 09/09/2010 09/09/2010 09/09/2010 09/09/2010

922 NOTICE Cancelling Hearing on 833 Sealed Motion to Exclude, 836 Motion for Summary Judgment, 848 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 850 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 852 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 854 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 856 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 858 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 859 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 862 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 864 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 867 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 869 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 871 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 873 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment, 881 Sealed Motion To Dismiss. (JHer) (Entered: 08/27/2010)
923 OPINION AND ORDER granting (856) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (703) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) Modified on 9/3/2010 (JHer). (Entered: 09/03/2010)
924 OPINION AND ORDER granting (848) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (695) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
925 SEALED OPINION AND ORDER granting (850) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (697) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
926 OPINION AND ORDER granting (871) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (718) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
927 OPINION AND ORDER granting (854) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (701) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
928 OPINION AND ORDER granting (867) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (714) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/03/2010)
929 OPINION AND ORDER granting (862) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (709) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/09/2010)
930 OPINION AND ORDER granting (873) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (720) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/09/2010)
931 OPINION AND ORDER granting (858) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (705) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/09/2010)
932 OPINION AND ORDER granting (869) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (716) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered:

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 113 of 132

09/09/2010 09/09/2010 09/10/2010 09/20/2010 09/20/2010 09/22/2010 09/22/2010 10/18/2010 10/18/2010 10/18/2010 10/18/2010
10/18/2010

09/09/2010)
933 OPINION AND ORDER granting (852) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (699) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/09/2010)
934 OPINION AND ORDER granting (864) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (711) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/09/2010)
935 OPINION AND ORDER granting (859) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (706) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/10/2010)
936 OPINION and ORDER granting (836) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (683) Motion for Summary Judgment in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (SJa) (Entered: 09/20/2010)
937 OPINION and ORDER granting (881) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (728) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (SJa) (Entered: 09/20/2010)
938 ORDER entered Overruling (814) Motion Objection to Magistrate Judge Orders in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; entered (662) Motion Objection to Magistrate Judge Orders in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/22/2010)
939 ORDER Denying as moot (833) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; finding as moot (681) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 09/22/2010)
940 AMENDED OPINION AND ORDER DENYING (765 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 613 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Second MOTION to Amend/Correct Complaint filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 10/18/2010)
941 JUDGMENT Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 10/18/2010)
942 BILL OF COSTS by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Document Continuation Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/18/2010)
943 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits and Appendices, # 2 Appendix A, # 3 Appendix C, # 4 Appendix D, # 5 Exhibit 1, # 6 Exhibit 2, # 7 Exhibit 3, # 8 Exhibit 4, # 9 Exhibit 5 Part I, # 10 Exhibit 5 Part II, # 11 Exhibit 6, # 12 Exhibit 7)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/18/2010)
944 EXHIBIT 8 Part I re (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8 Part II, # 2 Exhibit 8 Part III, # 3 Exhibit 8 Part IV, # 4 Exhibit 8 Part V, # 5 Exhibit 8 Part VI, # 6 Exhibit 9, # 7 Exhibit 10)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/18/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 114 of 132

10/18/2010
10/18/2010
10/21/2010 10/21/2010 10/21/2010 10/26/2010 10/26/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010 10/27/2010

945 [EXHIBIT 11, PART 2 AND PART 3 OF 5 REMOVED PURSUANT TO ORDER OF 10/27/10 BY JUDGE COX]EXHIBIT 11 Part I re (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 11 Part II, # 2 Exhibit 11 Part III, # 3 Exhibit 11 Part IV, # 4 Exhibit 11 Part V, # 5 Exhibit 12, # 6 Exhibit 13, # 7 Exhibit 14)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 10/27/2010 (PMil). (Entered: 10/18/2010)
946 [APPENDIX REMOVED PURSUANT TO ORDER BY JUDGE COX OF 10/27/10]APPENDIX re: (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation Appendix B Part I (Attachments: # 1 Appendix B Part III, # 2 Appendix B Part IV, # 3 Appendix B Part V, # 4 Appendix B Part VI, # 5 Appendix B Part VII, # 6 Appendix B Part VIII, # 7 Appendix B Part IX, # 8 Appendix B Part X, # 9 Appendix B Part XI, # 10 Appendix B Part II)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) Modified on 10/27/2010 (PMil). (Entered: 10/18/2010)
947 NOTICE by Cintas Corporation re (942 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Bill of Costs Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/21/2010)
948 COSTS TAXED in the amount of $18,295.30 against plaintiffs. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (DPer) (Entered: 10/21/2010)
949 MOTION re (945 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Exhibit, 11, Part 2 of 5 and Exhibit 11, Part 3 of 5 by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory)[MOTION TO REMOVE EXHIBITS/IMAGES FROM THE PUBLIC DOCKET] Modified on 10/22/2010 (DPer). (Entered: 10/21/2010)
950 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 10/26/2010)
951 MOTION re (946 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Appendix,, Motion to Remove Exhibits/Images from the Public Docket by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/26/2010)
952 ORDER granting Motion to Remove Exhibits/Images 949 in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (793) Motion to Remove Exhibits/Images from the Public Docket in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (PMil) Modified on 10/27/2010 (PMil). (Entered: 10/27/2010)
953 ORDER granting (951) Motion to Remove Exhibits/Images in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS; granting (795) Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (PMil) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
954 EXHIBIT 11, Part 2 of 5 re (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 11, Part 3 of 5)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
955 APPENDIX re: (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation Exhibit B, Part 1 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix B, Part 2, # 2 Appendix B, Part 3, # 3 Appendix B, Part 4, # 4 Appendix B, Part 5, # 5 Appendix B, Part

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 115 of 132

10/27/2010
10/27/2010
10/27/2010
10/27/2010
10/28/2010 10/29/2010 10/29/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010

6)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
956 APPENDIX re: (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation Appendix B, Part 7 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix B, Part 8, # 2 Appendix B, Part 9, # 3 Appendix B, Part 10, # 4 Appendix B, Part 11, # 5 Appendix B, Part I2)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
957 APPENDIX re: (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation Appendix B, Part 13 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix B, Part 14, # 2 Appendix B, Part 15, # 3 Appendix B, Part 16)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
958 APPENDIX re: (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation Appendix B, Part 17 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix B, Part 18, # 2 Appendix B, Part 19, # 3 Appendix B, Part 20)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
959 APPENDIX re: (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Cintas Corporation. by Cintas Corporation Appendix B, Part 21 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix B, Part 22, # 2 Appendix B, Part 23, # 3 Appendix B, Part 24)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/27/2010)
960 OBJECTION to (792 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 948 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Costs Taxed by Linda D. Allen, Stephanie L. McVay, Mirna E. Serrano. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Brant, Jennifer) (Entered: 10/28/2010)
961 OBJECTION to (948 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Costs Taxed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 10/29/2010)
963 MOTION Permission to File Response to Objection to Costs re (961 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Objection by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 10/29/2010)
964 RESPONSE to (787 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit D, # 3 Exhibit E, # 4 Exhibit F, # 5 Exhibit G)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
965 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 4, # 2 Exhibit 5, part 2, # 3 Exhibit 5, part 1)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
966 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 6, # 2 Exhibit 7)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 116 of 132

11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010

967 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
968 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
969 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
970 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
971 INDEX of Exhibits re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit B, # 2 Exhibit C)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
972 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
973 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8, # 2 Exhibit 9)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
974 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, Appendix B 2−1)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
975 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 2−2 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
976 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
977 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 2−3 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
978 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
979 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 3−1 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
980 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 3−2 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
981 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 3−3 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 117 of 132

11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010
11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010 11/03/2010

982 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
983 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 4−1 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
984 EXHIBIT re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
985 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 4−2 by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
986 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 4−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
987 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 4−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
988 EXHIBIT 11 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 11, part 1, # 2 Exhibit 11, part 2)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
989 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 5−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
990 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 5−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
991 EXHIBIT 11 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 11, part 3, # 2 Exhibit 11, part 4, # 3 Exhibit 11, part 5)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
992 EXHIBIT 12 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 12)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
993 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B 5−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
994 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 6−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
995 EXHIBIT 10 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10, part 1)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 118 of 132

11/03/2010

996 EXHIBIT 10 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 10, part 2)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010

997 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 6−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010

998 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 6−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010

999 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 7−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1000 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 7−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1001 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 7−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1002 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 8−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1003 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 8−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1004 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 8−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1005 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 9−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1006 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 9−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1007 EXHIBIT 8, part 6 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8, part 6)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1008 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 10−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1009 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 10−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 119 of 132
(Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1010 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 11−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1011 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 11−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1012 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 12−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1013 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 12−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1014 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 13−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1015 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 13−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1016 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 14−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1017 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 14−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1018 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 15−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1019 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 15−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1020 EXHIBIT 8, part 5, part 2.1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8, part 5, part 2.1)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1021 EXHIBIT 8, part 5. part 2.2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8, part 5, part 2.2)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1022 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 15−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 120 of 132
11/03/2010 1023 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 15−4 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1024 EXHIBIT 8, part 5, part 2.3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 8, part 5, part 2.3)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1025 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 16−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1026 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 16−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1027 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 16−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1028 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 20−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1029 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 20−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1030 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 20−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1031 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 17−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1032 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 20−4 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1033 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 17−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1034 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 21−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1035 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 18−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)
11/03/2010 1036 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 18−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 121 of 132

(Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1037 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 21−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1038 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 21−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1039 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 19 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1040 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 22 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1041 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 24 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/03/2010 1042 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 23 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Farnsworth, Jo Ann) (Entered: 11/03/2010)

11/05/2010

1043

STIPULATION AND ORDER Extending Response Time re (787 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k), Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings as to (787 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) :( Responses due by 12/8/2010) Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1044 EXHIBIT A, Appendix B, 17−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1045 EXHIBIT 5 part 2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1046 EXHIBIT 8 part 1−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1047 EXHIBIT 8 part 1−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1048 EXHIBIT 8 part 1−4 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 122 of 132
11/05/2010 1049 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1050 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1051 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−4 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1052 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−5 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1053 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−7 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1054 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−8 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1055 EXHIBIT 8 part 3−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1056 EXHIBIT 8 part 3−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1057 EXHIBIT 8 part 3−4 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1058 EXHIBIT 8, 3 part 5 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1059 EXHIBIT 8 part 3−6 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1060 EXHIBIT 8 part 3−7 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1061 EXHIBIT 8 part 3−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)
11/05/2010 1062 EXHIBIT 8 part 5−1 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 123 of 132

(Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1063 EXHIBIT 8 part 5−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1064 EXHIBIT 8 part 1−3 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1065 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−2 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/05/2010 1066 EXHIBIT 8 part 2−6 re (808 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS) Response to Motion, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 11/05/2010)

11/09/2010

TEXT−ONLY ORDER Striking for Violation of Rule 11 of the Electronic Filing Policies and Procedures re (806 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 962 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Stipulation, filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (JHer) (Entered: 11/09/2010)

11/11/2010

1067

REPLY to Response re (787 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS, 943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 11/11/2010)

11/23/2010

1068

NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of Tender of Response Brief in Opposition to Cintas's Objection to Taxed Bill of Costs (dkt. 961) (Attachments: # 1 Response Brief in Opposition to Cintas's Objection to Taxed Bill of Costs (dkt. 961), # 2 Index of Exhibits, # 3 Exhibit A: list of Dismissals and agreements terminating plaintiffs causes, # 4 Exhibit B: List of depositions showing double and triple recovery of costs, # 5 Exhibit C: Ortho−McNeil Pharm., Inc., v. Mylan Lab., Inc., 569 F.3d 1353 (Fed. Cir. 2009), # 6 Exhibit D: EEOC v. CRST Van Expedited, Inc., 108 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. 809 (N.D. Iowa 2010))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Bird, Kenneth) [THIS IS A RESPONSE TO OBJECTION TO BILL OF COSTS ] Modified on 3/3/2011 (JHer). (Entered: 11/23/2010)

11/30/2010 1069 MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of its Objections to Taxed Bill of Costs Entered by the Court Clerk by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit A)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 11/30/2010)

12/07/2010

TEXT ONLY NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE from Magistrate Judge Donald A Scheer to Magistrate Judge R. Steven Whalen pursuant to Administrative Order 10−AO−013. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−DAS (ATee) (Entered: 12/07/2010)

12/10/2010 1070 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

12/10/2010 1071 Certificate of Service re (914 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1070 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal. (TMcg) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

12/10/2010 1072 Certificate of Service re (914 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1070 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal. (DSmi) (Entered: 12/10/2010)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 124 of 132

12/15/2010

1073

NOTICE of hearing on (787 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k), (804 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 960 in 2:04−40132−SFC−RSW) OBJECTION to Taxed Bill of Costs, ( 805 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 961 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) OBJECTION to Taxed Bill of Costs. Motion Hearing set for 3/17/2011 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JHer) (Entered: 12/15/2010)

02/07/2011

1074

ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (669 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 821 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Tanesha Davis − Disposition: The motions to seal are GRANTED, without prejudice to reconsideration should it appear that the parties have sealed matters that should be made available to the public. [Appeal Case Number 10−1662]. (CGre) (Entered: 02/07/2011)

02/22/2011

TEXT−ONLY ORDER GRANTING re (1069 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 913 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) MOTION for Leave to File Reply Brief in Support of its Objections to Taxed Bill of Costs Entered by the Court Clerk filed by Cintas Corporation, (807 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 963 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) MOTION Permission to File Response to Objection to Costs re (961 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−DAS) Objection filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JHer) (Entered: 02/22/2011)

03/15/2011

Reset Deadlines as to (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 787 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) ( 805 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 961 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) OBJECTION to Taxed Bill of Costs. Motion Hearing reset for 5/12/2011 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JHer) (Entered: 03/15/2011)

05/05/2011

Reset Deadlines as to (943 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 787 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e−5(k) ( 805 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 961 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) OBJECTION to Taxed Bill of Costs. Motion Hearing reset for 6/1/2011 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JHer) (Entered: 05/05/2011)

06/01/2011

Minute Entry − Motion Hearing held on 6/1/2011 re 943 MOTION for Attorney Fees and 1068 Objection to Costs Taxed before District Judge Sean F. Cox. Disposition: Taken under advisement(Court Reporter Marie Metcalf) Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (FMos) (Entered: 06/02/2011)

06/02/2011 1075 ORDER Regarding Supplemental Briefing (912 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, re 1068 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (FMos) (Entered: 06/02/2011)

06/09/2011 1076 SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (961 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 805 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Objection to Taxed Bill of Costs Entered by the Court Clerk filed by Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 06/09/2011)

06/09/2011

1077

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (805 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Objection Opposing Application of Rule 6(d) to Defendant's Objection to the Clerk's Taxed Bill of Costs filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 FHC Equities, LLC v. MBL Life Assurance Corp., 188 F.3d 678 (6th Cir. 1999))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Mack−Brown, Aarika) (Entered: 06/09/2011)

07/28/2011 1078 NOTICE of Change of Address/Contact Information by Nancy L. Abell on behalf of Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW,

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 125 of 132

2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 07/28/2011)

08/04/2011

1079

OPINION AND ORDER re 960 Objection to and Motion to Review Bill of Costs, 961 Objections to Taxed Bill of Costs ; Granting in Part and Denying in Part (943) Motion for Attorney Fees in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW; granting in part and denying in part (787) Motion for Attorney Fees in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JHer) (Entered: 08/04/2011)

08/18/2011 1080 JUDGMENT in favor of Defendant against Plaintiff Intervenor. Judgment in the amount of $ 2,638,443.93. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (DWor) (Entered: 08/19/2011)

08/24/2011 1081 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re (924 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Judgment. Fee Status: No Fee Paid. (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 08/24/2011)

08/25/2011 1082 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re (925 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal. (DPer) (Entered: 08/25/2011)

08/25/2011 1083 STIPULATION AND ORDER for Stay Pending Appeal Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JHer) (Entered: 08/25/2011)

09/30/2011 1084 ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (925 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1081 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission − Disposition: motions are GRANTED [Appeal Case Number 11−2057] (SSch) (Entered: 10/04/2011)

02/14/2012

1085

ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (914 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1070 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission − Disposition: denying motion for assignment of the instant case to the panel assigned to the related Case No. 10−1662 [Appeal Case Number 10−2629] (KKra) (Entered: 02/14/2012)

03/01/2012

1086

ORDER from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (914 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1070 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission − Disposition: granting motion exceed page limit. The panel accepts the appellant's additional citation filed on 02/22/12 & the appellee's response filed 02/23/12. [Appeal Case Number 10−2629] (KKra) (Entered: 03/02/2012)

11/09/2012

1087

JUDGMENT from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit re (914 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1070 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, (925 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1081 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission − Disposition: Both judgments of the district court at issue in the present appeals are VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings. [Appeal Case Number 10−2629/11−2057] (KKra) (Entered: 11/19/2012)

01/23/2013

1088

MANDATE from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit as to (914 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1070 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, (925 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 1081 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission [Appeal Case Number 10−2629/11−2057] (KKra) (Entered: 01/29/2013)

02/01/2013 1089 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 2/15/2013 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 02/01/2013)

02/04/2013 1090 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Jonathan Bryant appearing on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bryant, Jonathan) (Entered: 02/04/2013)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 126 of 132

02/04/2013 1091 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE: Miles Shultz appearing on behalf of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Shultz, Miles) (Entered: 02/04/2013)

02/05/2013

Set/Reset Deadlines: Status Conference reset for 2/27/2013 11:30 AM before District Judge Sean F. Cox Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 02/05/2013)

02/06/2013 1092 MOTION for Withdrawal of Attorney (1) Kenneth J. Kryvoruka; (2) Erica D. White−Dunston; (3) Robert Unitas; and (4) Robert Dawkins by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Shultz, Miles) (Entered: 02/06/2013)

02/15/2013

1093

ORDER Granting (1092 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 935 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) MOTION for Withdrawal of Attorney (1) Kenneth J. Kryvoruka; (2) Erica D. White−Dunston; (3) Robert Unitas; and (4) Robert Dawkins filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

02/27/2013

Minute Entry − Status Conference held on 2/27/2013 before District Judge Sean F. Cox. Disposition: Order to Issue (Court Reporter Marie Metcalf) (JMcC) (Entered: 02/27/2013)

02/27/2013 1094 ORDER Following Status Conference. (Status Conference set for 5/7/2013 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 02/27/2013)

03/13/2013 1095 AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand Second Amended Complaint and Jury Demand filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission against Cintas Corporation. NO NEW PARTIES ADDED. (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/13/2013)

03/18/2013 1096 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin G. Stewart on behalf of Cintas Corporation. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Stewart, Benjamin) (Entered: 03/18/2013)

04/01/2013 1097 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Cintas Corporation.Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/01/2013)

04/18/2013 1098 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Parties' Joint Report to Court Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/18/2013)

04/30/2013

1099

NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission of Submission of Plaintiff's Proposed Scheduling Order and Memorandum in Support (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1 − Planitiff's Proposed Scheduling Order, # 2 Attachment 2 − Memorandum in Support of EEOC's Proposed Scheduling Order)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/30/2013)

04/30/2013

1100

NOTICE by Cintas Corporation of Brief in Support of Proposed Discovery Plan (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1 Proposed Discovery Plan, # 3 Exhibit 2 EEOC's Response to Cintas's Supplemental Interrogatories, # 4 Exhibit 3 Response of EEOC to Petition for Rehearing En Banc)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 04/30/2013)

05/01/2013 1101 STIPULATION AND ORDER for Stay. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 05/01/2013)

05/01/2013

TEXT−ONLY NOTICE: Status Conference on 5/7/2013 is Cancelled (JMcC) (Entered: 05/01/2013)

05/16/2013 1102 LETTER from the US Supreme Court that a petition for writ of certiorari was filed on April 15, 2013. [Supreme Court Case Number: 12−1347] [Court of Appeals Case Number: 10−2629, 11−2057] (KKra) (Entered: 05/17/2013)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 127 of 132

08/15/2013 1103 MANDATE from U.S. Court of Appeals − Sixth Circuit as to (669 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 821 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Notice of Appeal filed by Tanesha Davis [Appeal Case Number 10−1662] (KKra) (Entered: 08/19/2013)

08/28/2013 1104 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference (Case # 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) set for 9/16/2013 04:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Case: 04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 08/28/2013)

09/09/2013

Set Deadlines/Hearings: Status Conference as to Case #06−12311 reset for 10/28/2013 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox. Adjourned at the Request of Counsel. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 09/09/2013)

10/09/2013 1105 LETTER from the US Supreme Court denying the petition for writ of certiorari [Supreme Court Case Number: 12−1347] [Court of Appeals Case Number: 10−2629/11−2057] (KKra) (Entered: 10/10/2013)

10/16/2013

1106

STIPULATION re Set Deadlines/Hearings, STIPULATED ORDER FOR CONTINUANCE OF THE OCTOBER 28, 2013 STATUS CONFERENCE TO JANUARY 14, 2014 AT 2:00 P.M. by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 10/16/2013)

10/17/2013

1107

STIPULATION AND ORDER Resetting Status Conference as to case # 06−12311. Status Conference reset for 1/14/2014 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 10/17/2013)

12/16/2013 1108 NOTICE of Joinder/Concurrence in by All Defendants Joint Status Conference Report for January 14 2014 Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 12/17/2013)

12/19/2013 1109 STIPULATION of Dismissal in 2:06−cv−12311 Only by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 12/19/2013)

12/23/2013

TEXT−ONLY NOTICE: Status Conference on 1/14/2014 as to Case #06−12311 is Cancelled. Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 12/23/2013)

01/08/2014 1110 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 1/28/2014 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC) (Entered: 01/08/2014)

01/25/2014 1111 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Notice of Submission of Plaintiff's Proposed Scheduling Order (Attachments: # 1 Attachment 1: Plaintiff EEOC's proposed scheduling order)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/25/2014)

01/27/2014

Set Deadlines/Hearings: Status Conference set for 1/29/2014 10:30 AM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC) (Entered: 01/27/2014)

01/29/2014

Minute Entry for proceedings held before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Status Conference held on 1/29/2014 (JMcC) (Entered: 01/29/2014)

01/30/2014 1112 ORDER for Briefing of Issues. (Briefs due by 3/3/2014, Responses due by 3/17/2014) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 01/30/2014)

02/19/2014 1113 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Entire Action With Prejudice Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) by Cintas Corporation Associated Cases: 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW, 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW (Abell, Nancy) (Entered: 02/19/2014)

03/03/2014

1114

MEMORANDUM re (1112 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 1112 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Order, Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) Modified on 3/3/2014 (PMil).[DOCUMENT TITLED EEOC's BRIEF REGARDING CASE SCHEDULING] (Entered: 03/03/2014)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 128 of 132

03/03/2014

1115

MEMORANDUM re (1112 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 1112 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Order, Set Motion and R&R Deadlines/Hearings by Cintas Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/03/2014)

03/17/2014

1116

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (952 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Memorandum, Brief in Response to Cintas's Brief (ECF No. 1115 in 2:04−cv−40132) filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Bailey v. Great Lakes Canning, Inc., 908 F.2d 38 (6th Cir. 1990), # 2 Tisdale v. Fed. Express Corp., 415 F.3d 516 (6th Cir. 2005))Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/17/2014)

03/17/2014

1117

SEALED EXHIBIT Attachment #3 to EEOC's Response Brief (ECF No. 1116)−−Report of Dr. Baker filed under seal pursuant to Protective Order re (1116 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 955 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Supplemental Brief, by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Report of Dr. Baker, filed under seal pursuant to Protective Order)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/17/2014)

03/17/2014

1118

SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF re (1114 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 952 in 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW) Memorandum, Brief in Response to EEOC's Brief filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 1)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/17/2014)

06/09/2014

1119

SEALED MOTION, originally filed as ECF No. 833 (2010 June 14) and refiled pursuant to the Court's Order of 2014 January 30 (ECF No. 1222 at 3), to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert, Mary Dunn Baker by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 2, Report of Dr. Mary Dunn Baker, # 3 Exhibit 3, Declaration of Thomas DiPrete, # 4 Exhibit 4, excerpts from deposition of Dr. Baker, # 5 Exhibit 5, excerpts from report of Dr. DiPrete, # 6 Exhibit 6, declaration of Joseph Donovan, # 7 Exhibit 7, excerpts from Connolly work, # 8 Exhibit 8, excerpts from Baldus & Cole)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 06/09/2014)

06/30/2014

1120

STIPULATION AND ORDER Staying Proceedings as to 1119 SEALED MOTION, originally filed as ECF No. 833 (2010 June 14) and refiled pursuant to the Court's Order of 2014 January 30 (ECF No. 1222 at 3), to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert, Mary Dunn Baker Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 06/30/2014)

07/02/2014 1121 Notice of E−mail Delivery Failure as to attorney Lawrence A. Fields. Bounced NEF for 1120 Stipulation and Order,. (SSch) (Entered: 07/02/2014)

01/08/2015 1122 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Hearing/Conference re Case Scheduling set for 2/12/2015 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC) (Entered: 01/08/2015)

02/11/2015

Set Deadlines/Hearings: Hearing/ Conference re Case Scheduling reset for 2/17/2015 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC) (Entered: 02/11/2015)

02/12/2015

Set Deadlines/Hearings: Hearing/Conference re Case Scheduling reset for 3/2/2015 03:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC) (Entered: 02/12/2015)

03/02/2015

Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Status Conference re Case Scheduling held on 3/2/2015. Disposition: Order to Issue (Court Reporter Marie Metcalf) (JMcC) (Entered: 03/02/2015)

03/16/2015

1123

ORDER Denying Without Prejudice (1119) Sealed Motion in case 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW originally filed as ECF No. 833 (2010 June 14) and refiled pursuant to the Court's Order of 2014 January 30 (ECF No. 1222 at 3), to Exclude the Testimony of Defendant's Expert, Mary Dunn Baker by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Index of Exhibits, # 2 Exhibit 2, Report of Dr. Mary Dunn Baker, # 3 Exhibit 3, Declaration of Thomas

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 129 of 132

DiPrete, # 4 Exhibit 4, excerpts from deposition of Dr. Baker, # 5 Exhibit 5, excerpts from report of Dr. DiPrete, # 6 Exhibit 6, declaration of Joseph Donovan, # 7 Exhibit 7, excerpts from Connolly work, # 8 Exhibit 8, excerpts from Baldus & Cole); Denying (958) Sealed Motion in case 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 03/16/2015)

03/16/2015 1124 ORDER Requiring EEOC to File a List of Applicants on whose Behalf it intends to seek Monetary Damages. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 03/16/2015)

03/23/2015 1125 MOTION for Reconsideration re (1124 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Order by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Number 1: Interrogatory response)Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 03/23/2015)

03/24/2015

TEXT−ONLY ORDER DIRECTING the Clerk's Office to Sever Electronic Association Between Lead Civil Case No. 04−cv−40132 and Closed Member Cases 06−cv−12311. The Parties are to file documents solely in Case No. 04−cv−40132. SO ORDERED. Entered by District Judge Sean F. Cox. Associated Cases: 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW, 2:06−cv−12311−SFC−RSW (JMcC) (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/24/2015 1126 ORDER Requiring Response to 1125 Motion for Reconsideration. Response due by 3/31/2015 Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/24/2015 1127 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 4/14/2015 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC) (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/24/2015 1128 AMENDED NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference by Telephone set for 4/14/2015 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox. **COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF shall initiate the call and contact the Court when all parties are present** (JMcC) (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/31/2015 1129 RESPONSE to 1125 MOTION for Reconsideration re (1124 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Order filed by Cintas Corporation. (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 03/31/2015)

04/14/2015

Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Telephonic Status Conference held on 4/14/2015. (Court Reporter Christin Russell) (JMcC) (Entered: 04/15/2015)

04/15/2015 1130 ORDER Denying 1125 MOTION for Reconsideration re (1124 in 2:04−cv−40132−SFC−RSW) Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 04/15/2015)

04/20/2015 1131 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re 1124 Order Submission of List of Class Members in Compliance with March 16 Order (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/20/2015)

04/23/2015 1132 NOTICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re 1131 Notice (Other), 1124 Order Submission of Corrected List of Class Members in Compliance with March 16 Order (ECF No. 1124) (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 04/23/2015)

04/28/2015

1133

TRANSCRIPT of Telephonic Status Conference held on 4/14/2015. (Court Reporter/Transcriber: Christin E. Russell) (Number of Pages: 14) The parties have 21 days to file with the court and Court Reporter/Transcriber a Redaction Request of this transcript. If no request is filed, the transcript may be made remotely electronically available to the public without redaction after 90 days. Redaction Request due 5/19/2015. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 5/29/2015. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 7/27/2015. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date, the transcript is publicly available. (Russell, C.) (Entered: 04/28/2015)

04/29/2015 1134 OPINION AND ORDER re Disputed Case Management Issues. (Witness Lists due by 5/31/2015, Fact Discovery due by 5/31/2016.) Signed by District Judge Sean F.

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 130 of 132

Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 04/29/2015)

05/01/2015 1135 MOTION for Sanctions and Contempt by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6) (Stewart, Benjamin) (Entered: 05/01/2015)

05/11/2015

1136

RESPONSE to 1135 MOTION for Sanctions and Contempt filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1: Excerpt from EEOC's Brief in Opposition to Petition for Rehearing En Banc, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2: Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Chester, Wilcox & Saxbe, LLP, 546 F.3d 752 (6th Cir. 2008)) (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 05/11/2015)

05/18/2015 1137 REPLY to Response re 1135 MOTION for Sanctions and Contempt filed by Cintas Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − November 11, 2012 Petition for Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc) (Stewart, Benjamin) (Entered: 05/18/2015)

05/27/2015 1138 Stage I WITNESS LIST by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 05/27/2015)

05/31/2015 1139 Preliminary WITNESS LIST by Cintas Corporation (Utter, Gregory) (Entered: 05/31/2015)

06/01/2015 1140 STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Discovery Issues. (All Expert Discovery and Depositions Concerning Reports Disclosed due by 5/31/2016. See Order for additional dates. ) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 06/01/2015)

06/11/2015

Attorney James K. Fett is discontinued from receiving Notices of Electronic Filing. Reason: client's claim was dismissed. (Fett, James) (Entered: 06/11/2015)

06/11/2015

Attorney James K. Fett is discontinued from receiving Notices of Electronic Filing. Reason: client's claim was dismissed. (Fett, James) (Entered: 06/11/2015)

06/11/2015

Attorney James K. Fett is discontinued from receiving Notices of Electronic Filing. Reason: client's claim was dismissed. (Fett, James) (Entered: 06/11/2015)

07/06/2015 1141 STIPULATION AND ORDER for Withdrawal of Counsel − Laura Burstein Withdrawn. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 07/06/2015)

08/20/2015 1142 ORDER Denying 1135 Motion for Sanctions and Contempt. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 08/20/2015)

08/20/2015 1143 STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Stay of Discovery. (Phase I Discovery due by 6/30/2016) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 08/20/2015)

10/19/2015 1144 STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Stay of Discovery. ( Phase I Discovery due by 7/29/2016) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (SBur) (Entered: 10/19/2015)

11/11/2015 1145 Joint MOTION For Entry of Consent Decree by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 11/11/2015)

11/25/2015 1146 CONSENT DECREE re 1145 Joint MOTION For Entry of Consent Decree filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 11/25/2015)

01/14/2016 1147 MOTION for Withdrawal of Attorney Laurie A. Young by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 01/14/2016)

01/26/2016

TEXT−ONLY ORDER Granting 1147 MOTION for Withdrawal of Attorney Laurie A. Young filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 01/26/2016)

02/16/2016 1148 Proposed Distribution REPORT by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Bird, Kenneth) (Entered: 02/16/2016)

03/08/2016 1149 NOTICE of Proposed Distribution Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 03/08/2016)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 131 of 132

03/31/2016 1150 OBJECTION to distribution by Bernadette Lockhart. (ATee) (Entered: 03/31/2016)

04/07/2016 1151 Letter from Karen Allen (SSch) (Entered: 04/08/2016)

04/11/2016 1152 OBJECTION to distribution by Donna Southall. (DPer) (Entered: 04/12/2016)

04/13/2016 1153 OBJECTION to distribution by Dianne Jean Kredell. (DPer) (Entered: 04/13/2016)

04/18/2016 1154 OBJECTION to distribution by Elizabeth Gillete. (DPer) (Entered: 04/19/2016)

04/19/2016 1155 OBJECTION to distribution by Gina Parke. (DPer) (Entered: 04/20/2016)

04/19/2016 1156 OBJECTION to distribution by Deborah Agnew. (DPer) (Entered: 04/20/2016)

04/19/2016 1157 OBJECTION to distribution by Nadine Todd. (DPer) (Entered: 04/20/2016)

04/22/2016 1158 OBJECTION to distribution by Scherrie Davis Postiglione. (LHos) (Entered: 04/25/2016)

04/25/2016 1159 Letter from Marbalene Denise Miller (SSch) (Entered: 04/26/2016)

04/25/2016 1160 Letter from Darlen McKay (SSch) (Entered: 04/26/2016)

04/28/2016 1161 OBJECTION to Settlement by Angela K. Redmond−Elliott. (LHos) (Entered: 04/29/2016)

05/18/2016 1162 Letter (Objection) from Deneatta Hunter (DAll) (Entered: 05/19/2016)

06/13/2016 1163 Letter (Objection) from Latangia Winston (DAll). (Entered: 06/15/2016)

07/12/2016 1164 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Status Conference set for 8/2/2016 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox. **COUNSEL FOR THE EEOC shall initiate the call and contact the Court when all parties are present** (JMcC) (Entered: 07/12/2016)

07/29/2016 1165 Letter (Objection) from Ilene C. Lesniak (DWor) (Entered: 07/29/2016)

08/02/2016

Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Telephonic Status Conference held on 8/2/2016. (TMcg) (Entered: 08/02/2016)

08/10/2016 1166 ORDER Scheduling Fairness Hearing. (Fairness Hearing set for 9/16/2016 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Sean F. Cox) Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (SBur) (Entered: 08/10/2016)

08/16/2016 1167 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE re 1166 Order, Set Deadlines/Hearings by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Bryant, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/16/2016)

08/22/2016 1168 Letter (Objection to Settlement) from Kimberly Florio (DAll) (Entered: 08/23/2016)

09/02/2016 1169 MOTION Set Separate, Telephonic Hearing to Hear Gina Parker on Her Objection to the Proposed Distribution by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Correspondence from Parker's Counsel Regarding Conflict) (Bryant, Jonathan) (Entered: 09/02/2016)

09/08/2016

1170

ORDER SETTING Telephonic Fairness Hearing with Respect to Objector Gina Parker Only re 1169 MOTION Set Separate, Telephonic Hearing filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (Telephonic Fairness Hearing set for 9/22/2016 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox) **COUNSEL FOR the EEOC shall initiate the call and contact the Court when all parties are present** Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 09/08/2016)

09/09/2016 1171 Letter from Stacey Parm (BGar) (Entered: 09/12/2016)

09/14/2016 1172 NOTICE TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE: Status Conference set for 9/15/2016 02:30 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox. **COUNSEL FOR THE EEOC shall initiate the call and contact the Court when all parties are present** (JMcC) (Entered: 09/14/2016)

09/16/2016

Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Fairness Hearing held on 9/16/2016. Disposition: Under Advisement (Court Reporter: Marie Metcalf) (JMcC) (Entered: 09/16/2016)

Case: 2:04-cv-40132-SFC-RSW As of: 04/01/2019 10:12 PM EDT 132 of 132

09/22/2016

Minute Entry for proceedings before District Judge Sean F. Cox: Fairness Hearing as to Gina Parker held on 9/22/2016. Disposition: Under Advisement. (Court Reporter: Marie Metcalf) (JMcC) (Entered: 09/22/2016)

09/29/2016 1173 FINAL ORDER of Distribution. Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 09/30/2016)

12/09/2016 1174 Letter from Lesley N. Meeker re 1173 . (Ahmed, N) (Entered: 12/12/2016)

03/08/2017 1175 NOTICE TO APPEAR: Status Conference set for 3/16/2017 at 02:00 PM before District Judge Sean F. Cox (JMcC) (Entered: 03/08/2017)

03/10/2017

TEXT−ONLY NOTICE: Status Conference on 3/16/2017 is Cancelled. (JMcC) (Entered: 03/10/2017)

12/21/2017 1176 STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Consent Decree 1146 . Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (TMcg) (Entered: 12/21/2017)

12/21/2017 1177 CORRECTED STIPULATION AND ORDER Regarding Consent Decree 1146 . Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 12/27/2017)

12/21/2017 1178 CONSENT DECREE Signed by District Judge Sean F. Cox. (JMcC) (Entered: 12/27/2017)