IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY ) COMMISSION,
Plaintiff,
Wo
JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. Defendant.

HONORABLE
CASE NO.
1 : 03 C /u 109
COMPLAINT AND ,|UR¥ TRIAL DEMAND

NATURE OF THE ACTION This is an action under Title I of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, to correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of disability and to make whole Isaac Anaya ("Anaya"). The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission alleges that Defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc. violated the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to reasonably accommodate Anaya, a qualified individual with a disability and by terminating his employment.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE 1. Jurisdiction of this Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 451,1331, 1337, 1343 and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 107(a) of the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a), which incorporates by reference Sections 706(0(1) and (3) of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("Title VII"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e5(f)(l) and (3), and pursuant to Section 102 of the Civil Rights Act of 1991, as amended, 42 U.S.C. Section 1981(A).

2. The employment practices hereafter alleged to be unlawful were committed in the Western District of Michigan.
PARTIES 3. The Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the. "Commission"), is an agency of the United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation and enforcement of Title I of the ADA and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 107(a) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12117(a), which incorporates by reference Sections 706(f)(1) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3). 4. At all relevant times, Defendant Johnson Controls was doing business in the State of Michigan and the City of Holland, and continuously had at least fifteen (15) employees. 5. At all relevant times, Defendant Johnson Controls was continuously engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 101(5) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 121 ! 1 (5), and Section 101 (7) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12111 (7), which incorporates by reference Section 701(g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e(g) and (h). 6. At all relevant times, Defendant Johnson Controls was a covered entity under Section 101(2) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12111(2).
STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 7. More than thirty (30) days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Anaya filed a charge with the Commission alleging violations of Title I of the ADA by Defendant Johnson Controls. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 8. Beginning in April 2000, Defendant Johnson Controls engaged in unlawful employment practices in violation of the ADA Sections 102(a), 102(b)(5)(A) and 102(b)(5)(B), 42
2

U.S.C. §§ 12112(a), 12112(b)(5)(A) and 12112(b)(5)(B), at its Holland, Michigan facility. The Defendant’s unlawful practices include, but are not limited to, failing to reasonably accommodate Anaya as an employee and by discharging him.
9. Anaya is a qualified individual with a disability (kidney failure) who was able to perform the essential functions of his position with or without reasonable accommodation.
10. The effect of the above-mentioned, unlawful employment practices has been to deprive Anaya of equal employment opportunities because of his disability.
11. The above-mentioned, unlawful employment practices were intentional. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining the Defendant Employer, its officers, successors, assigns and all persons in active concert or participation with it, from engaging in any unlawful employment practice which discriminates on the basis of disability; B. Order the Defendant Employer to institute and carry out policies, practices, and programs which provide equal employment opportunities for individuals with disabilities, and which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful employment practices; C. Order the Defendant Employer to provide training to its management employees regarding disability and the ADA’s requirement to provide a reasonable accommodation to disabled employees; D. Order the Defendant Employer to make whole Anaya by providing him with appropriate lost earnings and benefits, with pre-judgment interest, in amounts to be proven at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary including reinstatement, if appropriate, to eradicate the effects

of its unlawful employment practices; E. Order Defendant Employer to make whole Anaya by providing compensation for past
and future nonpecuniary losses, as well as punitive damages, resulting from the unlawful practices complained of in paragraph 8 above in amounts to be proven at trial.
F. Grant the Commission its costs in this action; and G. Grant such further relief as the Court deems necessary and proper.
Respectfully submitted, NICHOLAS M. INZEO Acting Deputy General Counsel
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 1801 L. Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20507

DATE

ADELE RAPPORy(]?44833) Regional Attorney
ROBERT DAWKINS (P38289) Supervisory Trial Attorney
DALE PRICE (P55578) Trial Attorney
DETROIT DISTRICT OFFICE Patrick V. McNamara Building 477 Michigan Ave., Room 865 Detroit, Michigan 48226 (313) 226-6701

4

 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN
SOUTHERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION,
Plaintiff, V. JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.,
Defendant.

1" ..
Case No. 1:03-CV-109 Hon. Gordon J. Quist

CONSENT DECREE 1. Plaintiff, the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (the "Commission") commenced this action on February 18, 2003 in the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan, Southern Division, alleging that the Defendant, Johnson Controls, Inc. ("Johnson Controls") discharged and failed to reasonably accommodate Charging Party Isaac Anaya, in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42, U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Johnson Controls has denied these allegations. 2. As a result of settlement discussions, the Commission and Johnson Controls have resolved their differences and have agreed that this action should be settled by entry of this Consent Decree. It is the intent of the parties that this Consent Decree be a final and binding settlement in full disposition of any and all claims alleged or which could have been alleged in the Complaint against Johnson Controls or in the Charge of Discrimination filed by Anaya, Charge No. 230-AI-0710.

01.1546844.1

STIPULATED FACTS 3. The Commission is the agency of the United States government authorized by the ADA to investigate allegations of unlawful employment discrimination based upon disability, to bring civil actions to prohibit unlawful employment practices, and to seek relief for individuals affected by such practices. 4. Johnson Controls is an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning of Section 101(5) of the ADA, 42 U.S.C. § 12111(2), which incorporates by reference Sections 701(g) and (h) of Title VII, 42 U.S.c. § 2000e (g) and (h). Johnson Controls had at least 25 employees for 20 or more calendar weeks during the relevant period of time. 5. Pursuant to the ADA, the parties acknowledge the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan (Southern Division) over the subject matter and parties to this case for the purpose of entering this Decree, and if necessary, enforcing the provisions of this Decree. 6. Venue is appropriate in the Western District of Michigan (Southern Division). For purposes of this Decree and proceedings related to this Decree only, Johnson Controls agrees that all statutory conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit against Johnson Controls have been fulfilled.
FINDINGS 7. Having examined the terms and provisions of the Consent Decree and based on the pleadings, records, and stipulations of the parties, the Court finds the following:
a. The Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action against Johnson Controls;
2
101.1546844.1

b. The terms and provisions of this Consent Decree are fair, reasonable and just. The rights of Johnson Controls, the Commission, and those for whom the Commission seeks relief are adequately protected by this Decree;
c. The Consent Decree conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the ADA, and is not in derogation of the rights and privileges of any person. The entry of this Decree will further the objectives of the ADA and will be in the best interests of the parties and those for whom the Commission seeks relief. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED THAT:
NON-ADMISSION 8. This Decree, being entered with the consent of the Commission and Johnson Controls, shall not constitute an adjudication or finding on the merits of this case and shall not be construed as an admission by Johnson Controls of any violation of the ADA or, any other law, rule or regulation dealing with or in connection with equal employment opportunity.
NON-DISCRIMINATION 9. Johnson Controls shall comply with the provisions of the ADA, 42 U.S.c. § 12101 et seq., with regard to disability discrimination. 10. During the term of this Consent Decree, In regard to the Johnson Controls facilities located in Holland, Michigan, Johnson Controls agrees that before it terminates the employment of an employee who is on medical leave because of the expiration of the leave period, Johnson Controls will conduct an individualized assessment of the employee's ability to return to work, the prognosis for when such a return to work would occur, and whether an extension of the leave period would be a reasonable accommodation under the circumstances. If Johnson Controls determines that an extension of the leave would be a reasonable accommodation, the leave will be extended. In order for this provision to apply the employee
3
101.1546844.1

must have a disability within the meaning of the 'Americans with Disabilities Act and the leave must be due to such disability.
NON-RETALIATION 11. Johnson Controls shall not take any action against any person which constitutes intimidation, retaliation, harassment, or interference with the exercise of such person's rights under the ADA because of the filing of the Charge of Discrimination by Isaac Anaya, which forms the basis for the present case, or because such person gave testimony or assistance or participated in any manner in any investigation or proceeding in connection with this case under the ADA.
MONETARY COMPENSATION 12. Johnson Controls shall pay Isaac Anaya wages in the gross amount of $55,000 (Fifty-Five Thousand Dollars), minus tax withholdings. Johnson Controls shall issue a W-2 form in connection with this payment in the ordinary course of business. This monetary compensation shall be paid in a check made payable to Isaac Anaya, 154 W. 20th Street, Holland, Michigan 49423. Johnson Controls shall mail this payment to Isaac Anaya by overnight mail within ten (10) business days after all the conditions precedent set forth in the separate settlement agreement with Isaac Anaya have been met. Johnson Controls shall mail to Adele Rapport, Regional Attorney, 477 Michigan Avenue, Suite 865, Detroit, Michigan 48226 a copy of the check and the cover letter forwarding the check to Mr. Anaya. The Commission shall have the right to monitor compliance with this paragraph through inspection of all documents relating to said disbursement, induding but not limited to a copy of the check, check stub, letters, and any other documents evidencing payment hereunder.
4
)01.1546844.1

TRAINING AND/OR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS 13. Johnson Controls agrees that it will provide a mandatory training program to all management, supervisory and human resources personnel employed at its plant located at 1776 Airport Court, Holland, Michigan, 49423, who participate in return to work decision-making, which will focus on the requirements of the federal equal employment opportunity laws, including the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended. The training will include information and discussion regarding the ADA requirement that employers must conduct an individual assessment of a disabled applicant's ability to perform the essential functions of the job, with or without reasonable accommodation, before disqualifying such individuals from employment because of a disability. This training shall also discuss the duty of reasonable accommodation for employees with disabilities and the interactive process. Johnson Controls can decide who will provide this training.
POSTING OF NOTICE 14. Johnson Controls agrees that it shall post a copy of the Notice attached as Exhibit A in a conspicuous location where employee notices are posted in its facility located at 1776 Airport Court, Holland, Michigan, 49423. The notice shall be posted for two (2) years from the date the Consent Decree is entered by the Court. Should the posted notice become defaced, marred or otherwise made unreadable, Johnson Controls agrees to post a readable copy of the notice as soon as reasonably practical after it becomes aware of such situation.
DURATION 15. This Consent Decree shall remain in effect for two (2) years from the date it is entered, and the Court shall retain jurisdiction of this action during the duration of this Decree to enforce compliance with the Decree.
5
101.1546844.1

REPORTING 16. Six months after entry of this decree and on each anniversary of the entry of this Decree, the Defendant shall submit to the Commission a report of the steps it has taken to comply with this judgment. The Defendant's report pursuant to this paragraph shall be submitted to: Adele Rapport, Regional Attorney, EEOC, Detroit District Office, 477 Michigan Avenue, Suite 865, Patrick V. McNamara Building, Detroit, Michigan 48226. The reporting obligations under this paragraph shall cease after the Defendant submits the report due on or about the second year anniversary of the entry of this Decree.
DISPUTE RESOLUTION AND COMPLIANCE 17. The Court will have all available equitable powers, including injunctive relief, to enforce this Decree. Upon motion of any party, the Court may schedule a hearing for the purpose of reviewing any party's compliance with this Decree and/or ordering appropriate relief to determine whether the parties have complied with the terms of this Decree. Prior to seeking review by the Court, the parties shall engage in a good faith effort to resolve any dispute concerning compliance with the Decree. Any party seeking court review of a matter shall be required to give thirty (30) days' notice to the other parties before moving for such review.
COURT COSTS AND ATTORNEYS' FEES 18. Each party shall bear its own court costs and attorneys' fees.
MISCELLANEOUS 19. If any provision(s) of this Agreement is found to be unlawful, only the specific provision(s) in question shall be affected and the other provisions will remain in full force and effect. 20. The terms of this Decree shall be binding upon the present and future owners, trustees, administrators, successors, and assigns of Johnson Controls.
6
J01.1546844.1

21. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement and commitments of the parties. Any modifications to this Decree must be mutually agreed upon and memorialized in a writing signed by Johnson Controls and the Commission.
22. When this Decree requires or permits the submission of any documents by Johnson Controls to the Commission, if not otherwise indicated in the Decree, they shall be mailed to Adele Rapport, Regional Attorney, EEOC, Detroit District Office, Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building, 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865, Detroit, MI48226.

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC.

Regional Attorney
Stanley Pitts (P33519) Supervisory Trial Attorney
Dale Price (P55578) Trial Attorney
Detroit District Office Patrick V. McNamara Federal Building 477 Michigan Avenue, Room 865 Detroit, MI48226
Attorneys for Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

-Susan R. Maisa
FOLEY & LARDNER LLP 777 East Wisconsin Avenue, Suite 3800 Milwaukee, WI 53202-5306 (414) 297-5822
Attorney for Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc.
ERED
~~~
rdon J. Quist
MAFi 12 2004
DATE

7

A

DRAFT EXHIBIT A NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES This Notice is being posted as a result of a Consent Decree entered between the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and Johnson Controls, Inc. in E.E.O.C. v. Johnson Controls, Inc., Civil Case No. 1:03-CV-I09, to inform you of your rights guaranteed by federal law under the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. ("ADA"). The ADA prohibits discrimination against any employee on the basis of disability with regard to any term or condition of employment including hiring, layoff, recall, promotion, discharge, pay and fringe benefits or in retaliation for the opposition to unlawful employment practices. This Notice is posted as part of a resolution to a lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of a former employee who alleged that he was terminated because of his disability while out on medical leave. Johnson Controls denies that it discriminated in any way against the employee. The United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission is the federal agency which investigates charges of unlawful employment discrimination and, if necessary, files lawsuits in federal court to enforce the anti-discrimination provisions of the ADA. Any employee who believes that he/she is the victim of discrimination or retaliation has the legal right to file a charge of discrimination with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Johnson Controls supports and will comply with this federal law in all respects. Johnson Controls will not take any action against any employees because they have exercised their rights under the ADA.
8
101.1546844.1

Dated

Johnson Controls, Inc.

9
01.1546844.1

 
 United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan - Dock... https://ecf.miwd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?668951565050223-L_...

United States District Court Western District of Michigan (Southern Division (1)) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:03-cv-00109-GJQ

CLOSED, VFM

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Johnson Controls, Inc. Assigned to: Judge Gordon J. Quist Cause: 28:451 Employment Discrimination

Date Filed: 02/18/2003 Date Terminated: 03/12/2004 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff

plaintiff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by Adele Rapport U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (MI) 865 Patrick V. McNamara Bldg. 477 Michigan Ave. Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 226-6701 Email: adele.rapport@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Dale Price U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (MI) 865 Patrick V. McNamara Bldg. 477 Michigan Ave. Detroit, MI 48226 (313) 226-7808 Email: dale.price@eeoc.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. defendant Johnson Controls, Inc.

represented by Steven Richard Fox Foley & Lardner LLP (Detroit) 500 Woodward Ave., Ste. 2700 Detroit, MI 48226-3489 (313) 442-6429 Email: sfox@foley.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Susan R. Maisa Foley & Lardner LLP (Milwaukee)

1 of 5

6/7/2007 1:09 PM

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan - Dock... https://ecf.miwd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?668951565050223-L_...

mediator
Facilitative Mediator TERMINATED: 09/24/2003

777 E Wisconsin Ave., Ste. 3800 Milwaukee, WI 53202 (414) 297-5822 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Jon G. March Miller Johnson PLC (Grand Rapids) 250 Monroe Ave., NW, Ste. 800 P.O. Box 306 Grand Rapids, MI 49501-0306 (616) 831-1729 Fax: (616) 988-1729 Email: marchj@millerjohnson.com TERMINATED: 09/24/2003 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 02/18/2003 02/18/2003 02/21/2003 03/17/2003 03/17/2003 03/20/2003 03/20/2003 03/27/2003
03/27/2003 04/09/2003

#

Docket Text

1 COMPLAINT and jury trial demand against Johnson Controls, Inc. filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (cmi, ) (Entered: 02/21/2003)
SUMMONS ISSUED as to Johnson Controls, Inc. (cmi, ) (Entered: 02/21/2003)
2 NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS directed to Adele Rapport (cmi, ) (Entered: 02/21/2003)
3 ANSWER to complaint w/affirmative defenses by Johnson Controls, Inc. (elc, ) (Entered: 03/20/2003)
4 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. re 3 answer to complaint (elc, ) (Entered: 03/20/2003)
5 ATTORNEY ADMISSION LETTER sent to attorney Fox; attorney admission deadline set for 5/19/2003 (elc, ) (Entered: 03/20/2003)
6 NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS directed to atty Fox (elc, ) (Entered: 03/20/2003)
7 ORDER setting Rule 16 scheduling conference: Rule 16 scheduling conference is set for 4/24/2003 at 10:30 AM at 584 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman Jr.; status report due by 4/21/2003 ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 03/27/2003)
Copy of Order Setting Rule 16 Scheduling Conference, 7 sent via U.S. Mail to atty Fox (elc, ) (Entered: 03/28/2003)
ATTORNEY Steven R. Fox ADMITTED to practice in the Western District of Michigan (jal, ) (Entered: 04/14/2003)

2 of 5

6/7/2007 1:09 PM

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan - Dock... https://ecf.miwd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?668951565050223-L_...

04/25/2003
04/25/2003 04/28/2003 05/08/2003
05/08/2003 05/08/2003 05/08/2003 07/24/2003 07/31/2003 08/08/2003 08/08/2003 08/13/2003 09/24/2003
09/24/2003

8 RE-NOTICE of telephone Rule 16 scheduling conference set for 4/28/2003 at 09:30 AM at 584 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman Jr.; (Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, fh) (Entered: 04/25/2003)
Copy of Re-Notice of telephone Rule 16 scheduling conf 8 sent via U.S. Mail to atty Fox (elc, ) (Entered: 04/25/2003)
9 Minutes of Rule 16 scheduling conference held via telephone with Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman Jr.; Case Management Order to issue (Court Reporter FH)(Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman, fh) (Entered: 04/28/2003)
10 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: jury trial set for 6/1/2004 at 08:30 AM at 499 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Gordon J. Quist; settlement conference set for 5/11/2004 at 02:00 PM at 584 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Magistrate Judge Hugh W. Brenneman Jr.; final pretrial conference set for 5/24/2004 at 10:00 AM at 482 Federal Building, Grand Rapids, MI before Judge Gordon J. Quist; ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 05/08/2003)
11 ORDER SETTING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE BEFORE MAGISTRATE JUDGE BRENNEMAN ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 05/08/2003)
Copy of Case Management Order, 10 sent via U.S. Mail to atty Fox (elc, ) (Entered: 05/09/2003)
Copy of Order scheduling settlement conf 11 sent via U.S. Mail to atty Fox (elc, ) (Entered: 05/09/2003)
12 NOTICE of ADR Preference by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Price, Dale) (Entered: 07/24/2003)
13 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for Rule 26(a)(2) Expert Disclosure (Price, Dale) (Entered: 07/31/2003)
14 ORDER directing case to Voluntary Facilitative Mediation ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 08/08/2003)
Copy of Order 14 sent via U.S. Mail to attorney Steven Richard Fox; copy given to mjs/adr (mj) (Entered: 08/08/2003)
15 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. for initial disclosures (elc, ) (Entered: 08/15/2003)
16 ORDER referring case to VOLUNTARY FACILITATIVE MEDIATION: Facilitative Mediator rep by Jon G. March added; plaintiff VFM fee to be submitted by 10/6/2003; defendant VFM fee to be submitted by 10/6/2003 ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 09/24/2003)
Copy of Order Referring Case to Voluntary Facilitative Mediation, 16 sent via U.S. Mail to atty Fox (elc, ) (Entered: 09/24/2003)

3 of 5

6/7/2007 1:09 PM

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan - Dock... https://ecf.miwd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?668951565050223-L_...

09/26/2003 09/29/2003 10/03/2003 10/07/2003 10/07/2003 10/07/2003 10/09/2003 10/09/2003 10/09/2003 10/10/2003 10/10/2003 10/30/2003 12/15/2003 12/17/2003 12/17/2003 02/19/2004

17 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission For Plaintiff's First Interrogatories, Request for Production of Documents and Requests for Admissions (Price, Dale) (Entered: 09/26/2003)
VFM FEE RECEIVED in the amount of $25.00, check number 112 for payment of Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission's VFM fee (Related document(s),16,16) (ADR Administrator, mjs) (Entered: 09/29/2003)
VFM FEE RECEIVED in the amount of $25.00, check number 794523 for payment of Defendant Johnson Controls, Inc.'s VFM fee (ADR Administrator, mjs) (Entered: 10/06/2003)
18 FIRST MOTION for extension of time to complete discovery /For Modification of the Scheduling Order by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ; (Price, Dale) (Entered: 10/07/2003)
19 BRIEF in support of 18 Motion for Modification of the Scheduling Order filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Price, Dale) (Entered: 10/07/2003)
20 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission for Motion and Brief for Modification of Scheduling Order (Price, Dale) (Entered: 10/07/2003)
22 ATTORNEY APPEARANCE of Susan R. Maisa on behalf of defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. (elc, ) (Entered: 10/10/2003)
23 PROOF OF SERVICE by defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. re 22 atty appearance of Susan R. Maisa (elc, ) (Entered: 10/10/2003)
24 NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS directed to atty Maisa (elc, ) (Entered: 10/10/2003)
21 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 18 motion for extension of time to complete discovery ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 10/10/2003)
Copy of Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery 21 sent via U.S. Mail to atty Fox (elc, ) (Entered: 10/10/2003)
25 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission For Disclosure of Expert Witness (Price, Dale) (Entered: 10/30/2003)
26 PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER for modification of the schedulilng order by plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. (elc, ) (Entered: 12/16/2003)
27 ORDER granting STIPULATION 26. New final pretrial date is June 22, 2004 at 3:00 p.m. and trial is scheduled to begin on July 6, 2004 at 8:30 a.m. ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 12/17/2003)
Copy of Stipulation and Order for Modification of Scheduling Order 27 sent via U.S. Mail to attys Fox and Maisa (elc, ) (Entered: 12/17/2003)
28 ORDER FOR CLOSING DOCUMENTS ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Judge Gordon J. Quist, mil) (Entered: 02/19/2004)

4 of 5

6/7/2007 1:09 PM

United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan - Dock... https://ecf.miwd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?668951565050223-L_...

03/03/2004 03/12/2004

29 CHANGE OF ADDRESS by Susan R. Maisa for defendant Johnson Controls, Inc. to (Firm Name Change to) Foley & Lardner, LLP (elc, ) (Entered: 03/08/2004)
30 CONSENT DECREE ; signed by Judge Gordon J. Quist (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A) (elc, ) (Entered: 03/15/2004)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

06/07/2007 14:09:56

PACER Login:

hs0328

Client Code:

Description:

Docket Report

Search Criteria:

Billable Pages: 3

Cost:

eeoc 1:03-cv-00109-GJQ 0.24

5 of 5

6/7/2007 1:09 PM