APR 29 '34 02:21PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

P.2

OF THE COURT MONITOR
U S Dutrict Court District or Pu«rto Rrco
Morales FtUtitito v. RoutU6 ConidltT

April 29, 1994

Memo to: John Boston Al Bronstein J. Michael Keating,

From:

Vince Nathan

The stipulation I am enclosing with this memorandunnwas filed yesterday in San Juan. I think it contains a number of unique and quite interesting ideas, and I will be happy to hear any reactions any of you may have.

Incidentally, the $130,000,000+ referred to in section I is In addition to the roughly $120,000,000 in fines that were collected and that remain in the court's special account. Although the special account funds cannot be used for ordinary compliance related expenses, the $130,000,000 guaranty created by this stipulation is available for any compliance related activity.

The Corrections Compliance Coordinator referred to in paragraph II.B is likely to be someone from the Island without a background in corrections, but with broad experience in public administration (and politics). if this is the case, the deputy described in section II.B.7 is likely to be a corrections expert from the mainland. This person should and perhaps must be fluent in Spanish and must be willing to live full-time in Puerto Rico for at least three years or so. The salary will be at least $100,000 per year or whatever it takes to get the right person. If you have any thoughts about potential candidates, please share then with me as quickly as you can.

For the moment, I am hopeful that we have found a structure within which to begin to resolve the horrendous problems in Puerto Rico. I'll keep you posted on developments and let you know whether my optimism turns out to be well founded.

Feliciano v. Parole Board of Puerto Rico

• •

••

••

HH H

H

PC-PR-001-002

P.O. Bex 5919.0l<* Sat Juan Station, Sen Juan. P.ft 00902 • Phone: (809) 725-3747 • Fax: (909) 722-4410

RPR 29 '94 02=21PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

P.3

IX THB UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR TRI DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

CARLOS MORALES FELICIANO,

et al.,

\

Plaintiffs,

vs.
PEDRO ROSSELLO GONZALEZ, et al.,

Defendants.

Civil Case No. 79-4 (PC)

STIPULATION

xCrp. <->

On this 27th day of April 1994, the parties hereby enter o

into this stipulation and submit it to the Court for review and

approval. The parties respectfully inform the Court that they

will continue to negotiate the remaining issues set forth in

their February 4, 1994 Motion to Submit Agenda of the Proposed

Negotiations.

I. Fiscal Resources for Implementation

A. The defendants will be responsible for obtaining the

fiscal resources required to implement all provisions of this

stipulation and all other past and future orders and stipulations

in Morales Feliciano v. Rossello Gonzalez and Montgro Torres y^.

conzilaz ("orders and stipulations1') in a timely

fashion. All assessed but uncollected fines computed pursuant to

the Court's orders of July 23, 1987 and March 20, 1992, which

amount to $130,626,100, will guarantee the availability of

necessary funds on a timely basis. Of this amount, defendants

APR ZS '94 QZ'-ZZPn OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

p 4

will deposit into a segregated account ("guaranty account") under their control the sun of $20,000,000 and notify the Court of that deposit, as well as the identity of the account, within 30 days of the approval of this stipulation.
B. If the court monitor finds noncompliance with any provision of this stipulation or any other order or stipulation, the monitor will be authorized to determine whether noncompliance results, in whole or in part, from the absence of readily available fiscal resources. The court monitor also will determine whether defendants have made good faith efforts to obtain necessary funds through ordinary and usual Commonwealth budget procedures and whether funds are available within the existing Administration of Correction ("AOC") or Department of Health ("DOH") budget, as appropriate, that could be reallocated to remedy noncompliance. If the court monitor finds that necessary fiscal resources are not available, that defendants have made good faith efforts to obtain budgeted funds, and that necessary funds within the AOC or DOH budgets are not available for reallocation, the monitor may recommend that the Court approve the use of accumulated funds from the guaranty account to achieve compliance. The balance of the guaranty account, however, will be maintained at all times at the level of $20,000,000; thus, within 90 days following any expenditure from the guaranty account, any amounts expended from the account will be replenished by additional transfers to the guaranty account by defendants up to the total of the remaining amount of assessed

, APR 29 "34 02:22PM OFFICE OF THE COUPT MONITOR
but uncollected fines ($130,626,100 less amounts transferred by defendants to the guaranty account). Ho expenditures may be made from the guaranty account absent a prior order of the Court; moreover, the use of funds from the guaranty account will not toll any sanction that may result from noncompliance.
C. If at the conclusion of any fiscal year during which expenditures have been made from the guaranty fund, the AOC retains unexpended funds from its operating budget, defendants will credit the unexpended amount to the remaining balance of assessed but uncollected fines, but only to the extent of expenditures from the guaranty account during that fiscal year.
D. Either party may object to a recommendation of the court monitor for the use of funds from the guaranty account to make up for budgetary shortfalls affecting compliance* Neither party, however, may appeal the Court's final determination regarding any such recommendation*
E. In directing that any expenditure from the guaranty account be made for a specific compliance effort, the Court will establish the maximum length of time during which monies froa that source will be available for that specific effort. Unless otherwise specified by the Court, monies from the guaranty account will be available for a specific compliance effort no longer than the remainder of the fiscal year during which the relevant expenditures are approved; thereafter, defendants will be required to provide funds necessary to accomplish or continue

APR 29 '94 02:23PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR P.6
the specific compliance effort for which the Court approved the expenditure of monies from the guaranty account.
F. Transfers of funds from the Commonwealth's treasury into the guaranty account for the purpose of replenishment of that account will result in a corresponding diminution in the amount of assessed but uncollected fines ($130,626,100.00) available for transfer into the guaranty account. Defendants will account scrupulously for all expenditures from the guaranty account and will file regular accountings, as required by the Court, establishing that all expenditures from that account have been used for the purposes approved by the Court.
G. The provisions of section I of this stipulation do not in any way affect the Court's use or disposition of fines imposed and collected on or before January 3, 1992 pursuant to the Court's order of July 23, 1987 for purposes set forth in the Court's order of October 24, 1989. Nor do the provisions of section I of this stipulation in any way affect the use or disposition of any fines subsequently imposed as a result of any violation of this stipulation or any other stipulation or order of the Court. II. Organization of the Department of Corrections and. Rehabilitation and thfjftflTpfnlgtrationof Correction to Achieve Compliance
A. Organizational Plan 1. Within 90 days of the court's approval of this
stipulation, defendants will file an organizational plan consisting of a table of organization for the AOC and a

., . • H F R £9 '94 02:£3PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

p.-

description of the responsibilities and authority of each component of that table of organization. In particular, the organizational plan will address the following:
a. the authority and responsibility of the Secretary of the Department of Corrections 6 Rehabilitation ("DCR") and the Administrator of the AOC;
b. the authority and responsibility of each component of the central office of the DCR and the AOC; and
c. the extent of delegation of responsibility and authority to central office staff, complex managers, and institutional superintendents.
2. The organisational plan must ensure that sufficient authority and responsibility are explicitly delegated to central office, complex, and institutional officials so as to promote the maximum degree of efficiency and accountability.
3. The organizational plan must be designed to promote compliance with remedial orders as a highest priority.
4. The organizational plan will include specific job descriptions for all central office, complex, and institutional personnel appearing on the table of organisation. These personnel will include all persons filling positions required by this stipulation and all prior orders of the Court.
5. Defendants will engage one or more external consultants in the area of correctional administration to develop the organizational plan required by subsection II.A of this stipulation. Plaintiffs and defendants jointly request that the

-ir

APR 29 '94 02••23PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

P.g

Court allow fine fund money to be used to provide partial financial support for this purpose.
6. The organizational plan will be approved by the person designated by the Governor of Puerto Rico to serve as the Governor's personal representative in the Morales Feliciano v. Rossell6 Gonzalez litigation ("Governor's Personal Representative") and the Secretary of the OCR before that plan is submitted to the Court for its review and approval.
7. The organizational plan will contain a timetable for implementation of the organizational chart. Implementation will be conditioned on the Court's prior approval following an opportunity for comment by plaintiffs' counsel and the court monitor. If it approves the organizational plan, the Court will establish automatic sanctions for noncompliance with the timetable set forth therein, unless the parties have earlier agreed to the amount of such automatic sanctions.
8. Defendants1 failure to file the organizational plan required by subsection II.A of this stipulation will result in the imposition of an automatic and unappealable sanction of $10,000 per day until the plan is filed.
9. The parties acknowledge that the Governor of Puerto Rico is required by Reorganization Plan Number 3, approved on December 9, 1993, according to the provisions of the Executive Reorganization Act of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Public Law No. 5 of April 6, 1993) to submit for approval an organization

Ht-K C.-1 34 Ud-c-4hrl ' j t - h i ^ c >> rnE COURT Pluni fvR

p g

plan for tha DCR to the Legislative Assembly of Puerto Rico by March 1995.
B. Appointment of Corrections Compliance Coordinator 1. The Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
will appoint a person to serve as Corrections Compliance Coordinator. Prior to a final appointment, the Governor will obtain the Court's approval following a finding that the person to be appointed by the Governor meets the qualifications set out in paragraph II.B.4 of this stipulation and that the person is capable of carrying out the duties of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator. Once appointed, the Corrections Compliance Coordinator may be removed by the Governor, but only for good cause shown and with the prior approval of the Court after hearing the parties. In the event of such termination, the appointment process described in subsection II.B.I of this stipulation will be used to select a new Corrections Compliance Coordinator. No order entered by the Court under this subparagraph II.B.I may be appealed by any party.
2. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will be responsible for coordinating the activities of the AOC to achieve compliance with all orders and stipulations and for supervising changes in the policies and practices of the AOC necessary to achieve compliance with those orders. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator also will be responsible for fostering the development, education, and expertise of the administrative leadership responsible for the proper management of the AOC,

APR 29 '94 02:24PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

p.ia

thereby assuring that the agency will possess all capabilities necessary to sustain the progress which will have occurred when compliance with orders and stipulations has been achieved.
3. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will report directly to the Governor's Personal Representative and will provide direct guidance of defendants' activities and direct supervision of the AOC's and the Parole Board's employees whose responsibilities are related to achieving compliance with any orders or stipulations. The defendants will continue to employ the Corrections Compliance Coordinator until the Court determines that the Coordinator's services are no longer required to achieve compliance with orders and stipulations. All defendants and their subordinates will cooperate fully with the Corrections Compliance Coordinator in the discharge of that person's responsibilities pursuant to this stipulation.
4. The qualifications of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator will be the following:
a. fluency in Spanish and English; b. substantial management/executive experience in corrections and/or public administration; c. demonstrated competence as an administrator who possesses skills in program development and administration; d. demonstrated effectiveness in the use of human and budgetary resources to obtain optimum results; and

8

• HPR Z3 ' y 4 0c-c5Pn OFFICE <JF THE COURT NCMTOR

p.u

e. established or readily achievable capability to understand the complexities of the administrative, social, and cultural factors affecting the reform of the AOC.
5. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will have the following authority:
a. authority to direct and supervise all AOC employees in all of their actions and duties pertaining to any aspect of compliance with orders and stipulations;
b. authority to recommend the selection and, if necessary, the termination of all executive, administrative or professional personnel (except individuals appointed directly by the Governor whose appointment must be confirmed by the Senate) whose responsibilities are related to compliance with any orders or stipulations;
c. budgetary authority to direct, modify, and apply available resources to achieve implementation and maintenance of compliance with the orders and stipulations, including authority to allocate space, equipment, and staff necessary to achieve and maintain compliance;
dt authority over the development of all correctional policies and procedures related to compliance with orders and stipulations;
e. authority to submit to the.Secretary of the DCR recommended annual expenditures for inclusion in the annual budget of the DCR or AOC as necessary to achieve compliance with orders and stipulations;

APR 29 '94 02:25PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

p.!?

f. participation in reviewing and approving the design, construction, rehabilitation, or renovation of
correctional facilities;and
g. supervision in all respects, subject to the review and approval of the Governor's Personal Representative, of the preparation of all reports required by the Court in this cause.
6. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will consult regularly and frequently with plaintiffs1 counsel, defendants' counsel, the court monitor, and their designees. These persons nay assist the Corrections Compliance Coordinator in identifying priorities, developing and implementing compliance strategies, and obtaining resources necessary for compliance. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will file with the Court and serve upon the court monitor and counsel for the parties a quarterly report of his or her activities, as well as a statement of progress made toward compliance and outstanding obstacles to compliance, including the absence of readily available fiscal resources. Any additional statement may be filed at any time that the Corrections Compliance Coordinator deems appropriate,
7. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will identify and employ subordinate administrative, clerical, and professional staff to permit the orderly and efficient operation of the office of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator. In the
event that the person chosen as Corrections Compliance
Coordinator does not have substantial management/executive
10

HPR £y '34 0£:cbHn OFFICE OF THE COURT riONITOR

P.13

experience in corrections, the Coordinator will employ a person with such experience as a full-time, permanent deputy. The Administrator of the AOC will provide the Corrections Compliance Coordinator with adequate office space, equipment, transportation, communication equipment, and other forms of support for the Corrections Compliance Coordinator and his or her staff.
8. Nothing in subsection II.B of this stipulation in any way affects the authority or responsibility of the Chief Health Care Coordinator appointed pursuant to prior orders of the Court.
9. Plaintiffs and defendants jointly request that the Court allow fine fund money to be used to pay up to fifty percent of the salary of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator and his or her deputy, if one is appointed pursuant to paragraph II.B.7 of this stipulation. III. Population Management
A. Population Management Office Defendants will create a Population Management Office ("PMO") that will be responsible for daily monitoring and for ensuring compliance with subparagraph III.8 of this stipulation. To fulfill this function, the PMO will be adequately staffed and will function seven days a week, 24 hours a day, including all holidays.
1. Reporting of information to PMO
11

APR 29 '94 02:26PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

p 14

The Superintendent of each AOC facility or his designee will submit, via telefax, a verified copy of the institutional count taken at midnight of each day. This submission must be made seven days a week to the PNO within six hours following the midnight count. This verified count must include all prisoners assigned to authorized housing units, prisoners assigned to detention cells, holding pens, and admission cells, prisoners assigned to any other area or facility (whether or not authorized for the housing of prisoners), and prisoners assigned to the institution who are in transit at the time the count is taken.
2. Calculation and assessment of population No later than 11:00 o'clock a.m., seven days a week, staff of the PMO will calculate the system-wide population of the AOC and determine whether the agency and/or any institution is housing prisoners in violation of any capacity provision of subparagraph III.B of this stipulation or any prior order of the Court. 3. Dissemination of information
a. The staff of the PNO will notify, via telefax, the Administrator of Correction, the Corrections Compliance Coordinator, and the Office of the Court Monitor on a daily basis of the state of compliance with all capacity provisions established by subparagraph III.B of this stipulation and prior orders of the Court.
b. In addition, staff of the PMO will be responsible for providing the Office of the Court Monitor with
12

MPR C9 '94 0£:£bPn OFF I I I UF THE COURT riOhlTuP

P. 15

all additional information regarding AOC's daily population that is needed to permit the court monitor to fulfill his monitoring and reporting requirements.
4. Inter-institutional transfer authority of PMO a. Authorieation of transfers The PKO will operate with at least one staff
member in the office 24 hours a day. All non-emergency transfers of inmates will be subject to the approval of the supervisor of the PMO or his designee. Non-emergency transfers include the assignment of inmates from classification and intake centers to home institutions and inter-institutional transfers.
b. Inmate institutional assignment PMO staff will assign sentenced inmates to institutions once the inmates have been classified or reclassified. To this end, each day institutional staff will submit to the PMO a list of inmates who require transfers to another institution during that day. Institutional staff also will submit a summary of the institutional plan of each inmate on the list, and will include a "separation needs list1* or statement of other factors that may limit the options of PMO staff in assigning the inmate. PMO staff will review this information and assign each inmate to an institution, taking into consideration the inmate's programming, health, custody, and other needs. e. Emergency transfers An emergency transfer is one that must be accomplished without delay. All emergency transfers must be
13

APR '23 '94 03:47PM o r r i C E OF THE rnijPT MONITOR P.I
\
reported to PKO staff, via telefax and with supporting reasons for the transfer, as promptly as possible following the transfer.
5. Emergency Action Center a. the PHO will function as an emergency action
coordinating and reporting center. Every significant event throughout the day will be reported immediately to the PKO staff. Significant events include, but are not limited to, riots, deaths, assaults resulting in serious injuries, major use of force incidents, emergency transfers, escapes, escape attempts, assaults on staff, employee arrests, lockdovns, and strikes. Each morning, PMO staff will prepare a report with a listing and brief description of significant events that have occurred within the prior 24 hours. By 8:00 o'clock a.m., seven days a week, PMO staff will hand deliver, or forward via telefax, copies of this report to the Secretary of Corrections & Rehabilitation, the Administrator of Correction, the Corrections Compliance Coordinator, the Director of Operations, the Director of Security, and the Office of the Court Monitor.
b. A complete listing of the office and off-hour telephone numbers, beeper numbers, and cellular telephone numbers of the Secretary of Corrections 4 Rehabilitation, the Administrator of Correction, the Director of Operations, the Director of Security, complex managers, superintendents, complex security directors, and the Corrections Compliance Coordinator will be maintained at the PMO office. Each week, the Administrator of Correction will designate from among central
14
i • ••

APR ZS "94 83 = 48PM OFFICE o r THE , : 0 l j p T m n T 0 R
office executive staff an emergency contact. The Administrator of Correction will designate which types of incidents PMO staff will immediately communicate to the emergency contact. The emergency contact will determine what action has been taken by institutional staff and decide whether to notify the Administrator of Correction or other executive staff who can make decisions regarding emergent situations.
c. The redesignation of the use or mission of housing units or cell blocks (e.g., protective custody detention, security level, etc.) is subject to authorization by the supervisor of the PNO or his designee, after consultation with the Administrator of Correction or his designee. In an emergency, institutional staff may temporarily redesignate the function of a housing unit without prior approval, but institutional staff must notify the PMO immediately ofthe circumstances of the redesignation.
B. Sanctions for Capacity Violations The following automatic and non-appealable sanctions will apply as of the date of the Court's approval of this stipulation. Any such fines, however, will be levied by the Court only onthe basis of a finding of a violation after the parties have been given an opportunity to be heard. Moreover, any fines that may be levied will be calculated in accordance with the methodology employed by the monitor in the Fifth fiapor^ of the Court Monitor-First Report pursuant to the Court's Order of July 23. I9ft7and
15

29 '94 03:48PM OFFICE Of T h E COURT
approved by the Court in its August 14, 1987 order confirming that report.
1. Dormitories In the event that defendants, after June 30, 1994, provide any prisoner housed in a dormitory with fewer than 55 square feet of living and sleeping space as required by prior orders of the Court, defendants will pay a fine in the amount of $300 per prisoner, per day, for each such violation. 2. Cell housing In the event that defendants, after June 30, 1994, house more than one inmate in any cell containing less than 70 square feet of floor space, except as permitted by prior orders of the Court, defendants will pay a fine in the amount of $300 per prisoner, per day, for each such violation. 3. Detention Cells, Holding Pens, and Admission Cells
a. In the event that defendants, after May 30, 1994, house a prisoner in a detention cell, holding pen, or admission cell in excess of the capacity established by the Court's prior orders, and this violation continues for more than 24 hours, defendants will pay a fine in the amount of $600 per prisoner, per day, for each such violation.
b. In the event that defendants, after Kay 30, 1994, house a prisoner in a detention cell, holding pen, or admission cell beyond the length of time permitted by the Court's prior orders, and this violation continues for more than 24 hours, defendants will pay a fine in the amount of $100 per
16

HPR £9 "94 03:49PM OFFICE OF THE COUPT M O W TOP
\
prisoner for each hour (or portion thereof) any such violation continues.
4. Operational Capacity In the event defendants, after June 30, 1994, exceed the operational capacity of the AOC (total bed space within cellblock and dormitory capacity limitations x .95), defendants will pay a fine in the amount of $300 per prisoner, per day for each such violation. These fines will be calculated and assessed so as not to duplicate any fines assessed pursuant to subsections III.B.l, 2, and 3. 5. Role of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator to Remedy Capacity Violations
a. in the event of any capacity violation described in subsection III.B.1-4 of this stipulation, the Population Management Office will notify the Administrator of Correction and the Corrections Compliance Coordinator of the nature, extent, and duration of any such violation. This notification will be sent as quickly as possible but no later than the close of the business day on which the violation is discovered. Upon receipt of notice of a violation, it will be the duty of the Administrator of Correction to take whatever actions may be necessary to correct the violation. These actions may include but are not limited to suspending further admissions to one or more institutions, implementing intra-institutional or inter-institutional transfers, and expediting releases from the penal system. The Administrator of Correction will keep the Corrections Compliance Coordinator informed of all actions taken
17

jq '94 pi?: 29PM Off ICE OP" THF COURT MONITnp

p -.

pursuant to this paragraph, and the Corrections Compliance Coordinator will become directly involved in resolving the violation only if the actions of the Administrator of Correction fail to remedy the violation within 72 hours following notification by the Population Management Office.
b. Neither the Administrator of Correction nor the Corrections Compliance Coordinator will take any action under subparagraph 5.a., above, that will compromise the public safety or the health or safety of prisoners or AOC staff, or the integrity of the diagnostic or intake process. If the action of the Administrator or the Corrections Compliance Coordinator constitutes a reasonable and necessary temporary violation of any provision of any order or stipulation, the Adainistrator or the corrections Compliance Coordinator will file notice with the Court of that violation together with a plan and timetable for corrective action. The notice and plan must be filed no later than the end of the working day following the action,
c. Population Projections and Impact Statements 1. Population Projections Within 30 days following the Court's approval of this
stipulation, defendants will file a detailed plan, including reasonable deadlines, for fulfilling their obligations under paragraphs 2 and 3 of the parties1 December 30, 1991 Stipulation Regarding Population Management and a Pilot Project at Ponce ("December 30, 1991 stipulation") except the provision of
paragraph 3 addressed in the immediately following subparagraph
18

H P R C3 '34 Uc^c^FM UFFI'.E U F THE 'J.'URT MONITOR

p ^

of this stipulation. Upon the Court's approval of this plan, any failure to meet an established deadline will result in the imposition of a monetary sanction in an amount to be determined by the Court. Although both parties will be given an opportunity to be heard on the issue of the amount of the monetary sanction, the Court's decision on this matter will be final and not subject to appeal.
2. Impact Statements a. Within 30 days following the appointment of
the Corrections Compliance Coordinator, this person will establish a group with the expertise necessary to prepare interim impact statements analyzing the projected capital and operating fiscal impact on the Administration of Correction, including any impact on the level of the penal population, of any proposed legislation affecting any facet of the Commonwealth's criminal justice system. The person or entity selected by the AOC to develop and implement an inmate population projection prograa pursuant to paragraph 2 of the parties' December 30, 1991 stipulation will provide staff and technical support necessary to assist the Corrections Compliance Coordinator in preparing these impact statements.
b. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will forward his conclusions to the Administrator of Correction for transmission to the persons identified in paragraph 3 of the December 30, 1991 stipulation. The Corrections Compliance Coordinator will provide such interim impact statements until
19

APR 29 '94 02:Z9PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

P.ZZ

defendants have fully implemented the population projection program required by paragraph 2 of the December 30, 1991 stipulation. Any failure to provide a required impact statement vill result in the imposition of a fine in the amount of $100,000.
D. Intermediate Sanctions 1. Within 120 days following the Court's approval of
this stipulation, the Secretary of the Department of Correction & Rehabilitation vill submit a plan, including any necessary enabling legislation, for the implementation of intermediate criminal sanctions that vill reduce the pressure for expensive prison construction. The plan vill address the necessary safeguards to ensure the public safety and the integrity of the criminal justice process, including a program of intensive supervision when appropriate.
2. Proposed intermediate sanctions may include but are not limited to the following: house arrest, electronic monitoring, long-tern furlough, day reporting, community service centers, substance abuse centers, restitution centers, work release centers, halfway houses, hospice centers, special needs centers, weekend jail programs, and pre-parole facilities.
3. If the implementation of any such plan will result in increased utilization of intermediate sanctions, defendants may seek the Court's approval of matching funds from the fine monies accumulated pursuant to the Court's order of July 23, 1987. Fine monies for such programs will be provided only if
20

APR C3 ' 9 4 0£=3UFT1 OFFICE OF THE COUPT riOMITOP
placement in the intermediate sanction program is limited to persons serving a sentence of incarceration within the Administration of Correction. Moreover, fine monies foe a particular project will be provided for no longer than a threeyear period, and then on a declining basis (100%, 66%, and 33%) to cover operating and supervision costs.
E. Pre-Trial Services Program 1. Appointment of Pre-Trial Services Development
Committee As soon as practicable following the Court's approval
of this stipulation, the Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico will appoint a Pre-Trial Services Development Committee ("PSDC") consisting of the Secretary of Justice, the Secretary of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, the Commissioner of Public Safety and any other members the Governor may wish to appoint. The members of the PSDC will utilize the Executive Director of the Expedited Bail Project and his staff as a resource.
2. Pre-Trial Services Program Plan within six months of its appointment, the PSDC will file a plan to transfer the functions of the Expedited Bail Project to a Pre-Trial Services Division of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation. This plan will include any enabling legislation necessary to achieve the objectives of the pre-trial services program. The Pre-Trial Services Division may include the following functions: recommending release on personal recognizance;
21

H P R 29 '94 32:30PM OFFICE OF THE COURT MONITOR

P. 2a

recommending the conditions of any such release; supervising all persons during the period of their release on personal recognizance; and administering deferred prosecution and deferred adjudication programs. The plan will provide for the appointment of a Director of the Pre-Trial Services Division, whose compensation will be comparable to that of other department administrators and directors who report directly to the Secretary of the Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation.
3. Financial Support for the Pre-Trial Services Division
Upon its approval of the pre-trial services plan described above, the Court will authorise the permanent transfer to the Pre-Trial Services Division of the fine monies (up to $3,250,000.00) it has allocated to the special account of the Expedited Bail Project. These funds may be used to defray the initial costs of implementation of the pre-trial services program.

FOR THE DEFEN

FOR THE PLAINTIFFS:

Baltasafc Gbrrada del Rio Personal/Representative of the Governor/of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Catlos Harry/Xpduze Mon1 Rachel Brill
Jose E, Fernandez-sain Bruce J. NcGiverin Rafael Perez-Bachs Carlos E. Ramos-Gonzalez Nora Rodriguez Katias Luis M. Villarong* Jeffrey M. Williams counsel for Plaintiffs

22

A

E was

upon the defendants by placina it

—

••"•

Francis Filipi, Esq.

? ? S ? "" QJ C W
Thhiir?dd

aa°nndfSt77WhSwaelUnUAauatrtrteeo'Srt1n1r5e5e?y?ehhtG?seneral

Harrisburg, P A 17120

StefaS 'resser

 
 300 F.Supp.2d 321 (2004)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al, Plaintiffs, v.
Sila María CALDERON SERRA, et als, Defendants.
No. CIV. 79-004(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
January 26, 2004.
322 *322 Manuel A. Rodriguez-Banchs, Carlos V. Garcia-Gutierrez, Jose R. Roque-Velazquez, Civil Action and Education Corporation, San Juan, PR, for Carlos Morales-Feliciano.
Ricardo Alfonso-Garcia, Rafael E. Rodriguez-Rivera, Civil Action and Education Corporation, San Juan, PR, Lillian N. Miranda-Rodriguez, Cond. La Arboleda, Guaynabo, PR, for plaintiffs.
Marcos A. Ramirez-Lavandero, Ramirez Lavandero & Associates, Rio Piedras, PR, for Rafael Hernandez-Colon.
Eileen Landron-Guardiola, Eduardo A. Vera-Ramirez, Landron & Vera-Ramirez, Landron & Vera LLP, Guaynabo, PR, for Johnny Rullan.
Esther Crespin-Credi, Dept. of Justice, Federal Litigation Div., San Juan, PR, for Mirla M. Rodriguez-Marin.
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
On October 1, 2003, Defendant Hon. John Rullán, MD, Secretary of the Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico filed a Motion Under the PLRA to Vacate or Terminate the Court Relief Mandating the Transfer and Privatization of the Correctional Health Program of the Department of Health (Dkt.# 8486) (hereinafter Defendant's Motion).[1] On October 23d the Plaintiff Class opposed and filed a cross motion (Dkt.8500) to modify the Medical and Mental Health Plans by terminating two sections of those Plans (Dkt.# 1959), and a handful of ancillary orders. A hearing was set for November 4, 2003.
Over the course of several hearings Defendant presented the testimony of Dr. Héctor José Mena Franco, MD, 323 Executive *323 Director of the Correctional Health Program, Dr. Aida Guzmán Font, MD, who headed the
Correctional Health Program from April of 1993 through March 2000 and from February 2001 through March 2003 as Chief Health Care Coordinator, Dr. Robert Dennis Jones, MD, who testified as an expert in medical, mental and dental correctional health and administration[2], and the Hon. Miguel Angel Pereira Castillo, Secretary of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and acting Administrator of the Administration of Corrections. In addition, extensive documentary evidence was admitted into evidence. After the presentation of this evidence Defendant rested on the issues of alleged compliance with the Medical and Mental Health Plans and the supposed lack of current and ongoing constitutional violations.
The order at issue is part of a stipulation or consent decree entered into by the parties in September 1997 as a joint alternative proposal for a remedy to substandard and chaotic conditions or denial of health care throughout the Administration of Corrections, all of which is detailed in the court's Opinion and Order, Morales Feliciano v. Rossello Gonzalez, 13 F.Supp.2d 151 (D.P.R.1998). The court approved and ordered the consent decree executed, without passing on the court's own expert witness' recommendation for a receivership. One important component of the joint proposal was defendants' responsibility to set up a private not-for-profit corporation (the initial organizational communication and operational expenses to be paid for out of fine funds held by the court) which would eventually contract with the Administration of Correction to provide health care to persons in custody of the Administration of Corrections. Extensive testimony and charts were presented during the process in 1997

to be followed until the not-for-profit corporation (eventually registered as the Correctional Health Services Corporation or CHSC) could compete with other providers in Puerto Rico's newly privatized indigents' health care economy in contracting with the AOC.
The Secretary's contention in requesting termination is threefold; that the Correctional Health Services Program is performing efficiently its task of delivering health care to persons in the custody of the AOC, that the CHP is complying with the Medical and Mental Health Plans and, that prisoners' federally protected rights are no longer violated. The Secretary, on his own evidence, is wrong.
FINDINGS OF FACT
The defendant has established that by contracting with private individuals and companies he has greatly enriched the professional staffing his command. He has also established through his own witnesses that fully one fourth of inmates who request sick-call do not get it; only 55% of ambulatory care appointments in fact occur, and only 49% of extra-mural appointments are met (these are specialist consultations for serious conditions, surgery etc.). The quoted percentages are a few points below the 1996-1997 averages, and in the case of outside specialist or hospital appointments the drop is significant, from 61.8% completion in 1996-1997 to 49% at present. All of this is enough to find that there is still a present and ongoing systematic and massive denial of health care to the inmate population in the care of the Correctional Health Program.
324 *324 In 1998 the court found that "[t]he deficiencies evidenced at the hearing are the result of systematic infirmities in the correctional health scheme, which can be characterized as (a) obstructionist interference from and inefficiency within the Department of Health and other government agencies and (b) the lack of cooperation on the part of the Administration of Correction." Morales Feliciano, 13 F.Supp.2d at 179-180. Since the Secretary has increased expenditures on professionals and private service companies[3] and inmates still fail to get health care in very substantial numbers (at eroding rates, in fact), the only finding that the court can make is that the Correctional Health Program and the Department of Health continue to fail in the administration of increased resources and continue to violate prisoners federally protected constitutional rights. The court cannot but underline that denial of health services is massive and systematic.
No matter how much the Correctional Health Program blames the Administration of Corrections for the Program's failure, the court cannot accept the present and ongoing mistreatment of plaintiffs because two cabinet secretaries 0907 Health and Corrections 0907 cannot get together to solve custody and transportation issues. Theirs has been and still is a joint responsibility[4] until we all deal with the consequences of Plaintiffs' motion to terminate which we discuss further on. Since 1993 Dr. Aida Guzmán, M.D. has been involved with correctional health care. During the present hearings she had this to say about interagency cooperation and the failure to deliver health care:
Because the problems are the same as in 1997, same problems, problems with access.
. . . . .
It is the same problems, because there has been no actual change in terms of the attitude of the organization of the Administration of Correction in providing access to care; that has not changed.
Tr. at 909:4-13.
The delays in affording inmates with important extra-institutional appointments and medical care paint a grimmer picture than that of 1997. The situation is particularly critical in the Ponce Correctional Complex, Ex. 18, where a significant percentage (just over 20%) of the total inmate population live, including almost 40% of the women under the custody of the AOC. Tr. at 1158:4-7. The Master List of Medical Routes for the Ponce Complex, copy of which was marked as plaintiffs' Exhibit 18, is plagued with instances of patients that missed important medical appointments and procedures due to lack of transportation. For example, between September 23 and September 30, 2003, all of the Ponce inmates that were scheduled for extra-institutional medical appointments 0907 a total of 72 0907 missed them. Ex.18. Among the appointments missed during that week were 12 mammograms, 6 abdominal/

pelvic sonograms, 4 brain CT scans, 2 MRI's, and various orthopedic and oncological evaluations that are 325 described as "important" in *325 the log. Id. On October 15 and 16, 2003, all of the 23 appointments scheduled
for those 2 days were also missed. Id. The same was true with the 14 appointments scheduled for October 9, 2003, the 12 for October 7, 2003, and the 18 for October 2, 2003, to name just a few. Id. One of the appointments missed on October 2, 2003 was a surgical intervention that the inmate Luis Martínez Cruz was supposed to have that day. Id. The female Ponce inmates have been left without gynecological medical attention since the end of September 2003, Tr. at 1154:20-1155:2, and are experiencing and have experienced delays of over 6 months to have mammograms performed. Tr. at 524:1-5. Although Exhibit 17 established that such had been the case of inmate Marta López Huertas, hers was not an isolated incident as evinced by Exhibit 18.
As a matter of fact, the last time that a female inmate from Ponce was taken to her scheduled mammogram was on May, 6, 2003. Since then, all of the mammogram appointments have been missed for lack of transportation. Exhibit 18. Inmate Conilia Betancourt Fernández has been waiting to have a mammogram since April 22, 2003, Ruth Rodríguez Santiago since May 1, 2003, and María Cameron Alers since May 15, 2003. From then on, Conilia Betancourt Fernández has not been taken to 6 mammogram appointments (June 3, June 19, July 15, August 28, September 30, and October 28, 2003), Ruth Rodríguez Santiago, to 4 (June 12, June 19, September 4, and October 2, 2003), and María Cameron Alers, to 6 (June 3, June 19, July 15, August 28, September 25, and October 30, 2003). During that same time span, various other female inmates were not transported to their scheduled mammograms on more than one occasion, to wit: Leonilda Santiago Santiago was forced to miss her appointments for August 26, September 25 and October 30, 2003, Norma Rosa Rivera and Betsy Rodríguez Vargas missed their respective appointments for August 28, September 30 and October 28, 2003, Rosa Robles Galarza missed hers for September 18 and October 21, 2003, while Ana Peña Frías had to endure the same outcome on September 23 and October 23, 2003. Ex. 18.
Such extended delays in obtaining medically ordered medical tests is simply unacceptable under any set of standards. Tr. at 1178:25-1179:12. A delay of eleven (11) months for a CT scan is equally untenable. Id. Such was the case of inmate José Velázquez Rivera, from Ponce Maximum. Ex. 19. The systemic infirmities caused by the AOC's lack of cooperation with the CHP persist at present. As Dr. Guzmán opined:
I think that the Administration of Corrections has been consistently and historically unresponsive to the needs of the [correctional health] program and above all to the needs of the patients.
Tr. at 905:18-21.
Despite claims to have done everything possible to ensure inmate's access to appointments, Tr. at 902:17-23, the CHP has exacerbated this problem by inflexibly centralizing its services in a system which has historically suffered from problems with access to medical appointments. Tr. at 902:17-23, 1161:20-24, 1163:4-21. No example of this is more illustrative than the situation which has arisen in Bayamón 501, an institution which houses protective custody inmates, who are at risk of being attacked when placed in the general population. Since that institution's medical area was shut down, injectables can only be given at a neighboring general population institution, Bayamón 1072. Tr. at 583:3-14. This means that insulin dependent patients from Bayamón 501 have to be taken up to twice a day to Bayamón 1072 to receive their shots. Tr. at 578:15-18, 579:5-16. These 326 protective custody inmates *326 sometimes spend the entire day in Bayamón 1072's medical area, which has very poor security, with general population inmates. Tr. at 578:23-25; 579:2-4, 580:7-15, 581:12-25. This same procedure applies to other protective custody inmates from Bayamón 501 who require injections. Tr. at 581:12-25, 583:3-14.
No good reason was given at the hearings by defendant for having to transport these inmates to Bayamón 1072, instead of coordinating a system for providing insulin shots at Bayamón 501. Tr. at 717:6-719:18, 722:10-14, 727:6-14. This problem, seemingly a simple one to solve through mutual cooperation between AOC and CHP, eventually lead to litigation in the Puerto Rico Superior Court which resulted in an injunction being issued against the CHP requiring it to provide insulin shots in the protective custody institution. Tr. at 724; 728:10. Nevertheless, for reasons which are totally incomprehensible, this service is being provided only to the patient who requested the injunction, and the remaining insulin dependent patients are still required to move to another facility on a daily basis to receive their shots. Tr. at 728:3-16. This absurd result is a perfect example of the Department of Health's and Administration of Corrections' senseless inability to work with each other to achieve common goals. This

problem is not occurring only because the AOC is not doing its part, but because there is a fundamental failure between both parties to cooperate.
The high level of tension and the utter failure of the AOC and the CHP to coordinate, communicate, and cooperate is also evident in the fortune of the medical cadre. Developed for the purpose of ensuring security in medical areas and that medical escorts would be available to transport inmates to their medical appointments, Tr. at 770:24-771:2, this remedy has not had the expected results, again, because of the lack of cooperation between AOC and CHP, Tr. at 780:13-781:4, 782:10-16, 902:22-903:9.
Another system-wide problem which persists and downgrades the value or limits the availability of the health care provided are the inadequate physical facilities. In this regard, Dr. Guzmán's testimony was also particularly telling when she characterized the facilities as "shameful for our patients and for our health professionals." Tr. at 904:12-13. Dr. Guzmán explained the reasons for the progressive deterioration of the physical plant, when compared to the 1997 conditions, as follows:
[T]here has been no success in trying to get the collaboration of the Administration of Correction in accessing patients to our services and in the physical facilities. It is the same. In fact they are worse facilities, because around seven years have passed by, in terms of the deterioration of the physical facilities, so they are worse.
Tr. at 909:23-910:4.
There has also been longstanding chronic neglect of the physical facilities for medical area services. Tr. at 761:11-13. The facilities available are small and deteriorated. Tr. at 498:6-7. The lack of appropriate facilities clearly affects the CHP's ability to deliver health services. Tr. at 497:25-498:2.
Infirmary beds are often full and obligate the CHP to keep patients in the emergency room. Tr. at 788:9-13. There is a long waiting list for medical dormitory beds because there are not enough beds to take care of the patients with chronic conditions for whom such housing is necessary. Tr. at 788:16-20. Areas designated for medical dormitories were taken over years ago (in fact, before the Court's 1998 findings) by the AOC for other uses 327 (housing for inmates) and were never returned *327 to CHP for use as medical dormitories. Tr. at 788:20-789:2. There are no isolation rooms for the management of patients with active tuberculosis. 989:23-990:24.
There are now less Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) beds for patients who need acute mental health care services than there were in 1997, twenty, while there has been an increase in the inmate population. Paragraph 8 of the Mental Health Plan requires 2 PICU beds per 1,000 inmates. In 1997, the court found that 25 such beds were required, which left a shortage of 5. At present 30 PICU beds would be required, while there are only 18 PICU beds, Tr. at 811:15-812:4, two of which no longer really function as a PICU. Tr. at 820:18-24. Hence the shortage of PICU beds has now more than doubled when compared to 1997.
The CHP expects to acquire 13 additional beds, but the current waiting list is of 70 patients. Tr. at 598:16-18. Generally throughout the system there are 1,311 inmates, equivalent to 8.7% of the total population, that are being housed in areas that do not provide them with the level of care that their chronic medical or mental conditions require, Tr. at 1260:2-6, all in violation of paragraphs 28 and 29 of the Medical Plan. Ultimately what this means is that persons having medical conditions which require a certain level of constant oversight and attention will simply have to go without.
The CHP again attempts to place the onus of this problem on the AOC. However, although the interagency agreement between AOC and the Department of Health states that the AOC shall provide necessary space for medical services, 708:17-24, the fact is that the Medical Care Plan places responsibility upon the Health Department as well as the AOC for the provision of adequate medical facilities. Tr. at 735:3-14. In fact, the Department of Health through the CHP has and maintains the correctional psychiatric hospital for the exclusive benefit of the inmates under the custody of the AOC. Even though under the circumstances it may not be reasonable to expect the CHP to build all the facilities it needs, they certainly have not reached out to the Court to request its assistance with this problem, and, from the evidence presented there is no suggestion that they have endeavored to do much more than write a few strongly worded letters and attend a handful of meetings. Tr. at 536:XX-XX-XXX:3-20.

Although, the medical doctors at CHP prescribe medical diets, Tr. at 599:11-18, medical diets are still not being provided to inmates, 1087:1-5, 1088:3-4, 1088:15-17, slowly but surely endangering the health and well being, and in some cases the lives of those patients who require them. Morales Feliciano v. Rossello, 13 F.Supp.2d 151, 197 (D.P.R.1998) Among those who require special diets are insulin dependent diabetics, non-insulin diabetics, patients with renal and hepatic conditions and heart disease. Tr. at 600:1-17. In the April, May and June quarter of 2003, 3,120 diets were prescribed and not provided. Tr. at 609:15-18. Although food service is administered by the Administration of Corrections, there is no evidence that the CHP does anything whatsoever to remedy the longstanding problem of medical diets.

Defendant makes much ado of improvements to the system relating to the CHP's fiscal and administrative autonomy. Tr. at 1305:1-10. In fact, over the past few years since the Court's May 1998 Order, the improvements in the CHP that can be observed are due entirely to the Court's direct intervention. The fiscal and administrative autonomy as well as the power to contract directly with professionals and service providers were rooted in orders issued by this Court:

328

*328 Q. Doctor, based on your years of experience in the program, what has happened that has

assisted the program in achieving, progressing, staffing, supplies, etcetera.

[Dr. Aida Guzmán] I think that if you look at this longitudinally, one of the big problems that the program faced in 1997 was the lack of administrative autonomy, everything had to go through a facility, which was the operational branch of the Department of Health. The administrative offices of the program at that time, in 1997 were just offices where documents went by, went through and there was no decision making at the program level. I think that a number of things happened that allowed the program to obtain the administrative autonomy that it needed so that it could recruit, retain, buy, and so forth and so on, all the administrative functions and it started with the Court order in 1997 authorizing the chief health care coordinator to process and sign all contracts and had the responsibility of hiring professional services under contract. That started it. There were a number of administrative orders from the Secretary of Health, I believe there were two of them, that partially, during late 1997 and 1998, partially gave some functions to the program in terms of administrative autonomy, but actually they were not really enforced. In 1999 when the AFASS, which again was the operational branch of the Department of Health, closed down, a few months before the closing down of the AFASS agency the program received an administrative order from the Secretary of Health, 141 which really gave autonomy to the program. It gave the authority to appoint temporary positions, it gave autonomy to contract hospital and services in the community, it also gave the authority to prepare and negotiate and present some budgets to the office of management and budget. It allowed the program to establish and develop the auction board which was very important in terms of obtaining equipment, materials, medications, etcetera, because the program up until then depended entirely on a facility, so that it gave the program the autonomy that it really needed to enhance the recruitment of very much needed professional personnel. And I think that that really helped.

Tr. at 887:17-889:10; see also Tr. at 672:1-21, 674:16-19, 676:11-13, 676:17-677:4. In fact, the administrative order Dr. Guzmán refers to states that it is issued, in part, under authority of the Orders of the Morales Feliciano case. Dr. Mena, the present Executive Director of the CHP, continues to benefit from those court orders even though he is not, in point of fact, covered by them. Tr. at 678:1-17. In addition, the infectious disease control program began to function properly when the Court allocated fine monies to the purchase of computer equipment and software necessary for the program's day to day work. Tr. at 848:19-851.

Despite these improvements, the Department of Health has been unable to comply, substantially or otherwise, with constitutional norms and with the Medical and Mental Health Care Plans. The CHP still suffers from a whole string of problems that adversely affect inmates' health care.

Having written manuals and guidelines is necessary in order to maintain accountability in the provision of health services. Tr. at 1187:20-1188:3. Nevertheless, only 1 of 8 treatment protocols for mental conditions has been prepared for a meager 12.5% compliance rate with paragraph 9 of the Medical Plan, which requires "written

protocols for the delivery of medical, dental and mental health services." Tr. at 1262:23-1263:13. The suicide 329 protocol *329 (prevention manual) is still wanting while suicides have substantially increased from 1 in 2002 to 7
during the first 9 months of 2003. Tr. at 1075:25-1076:5, 1189:13-21, 1077:20-22.

There are currently 1085 inmates with an HIV diagnosis; yet there are only 340, or 31.3%, undergoing treatment for that condition. Tr. at 1263:24-1264:7. Likewise, there is no protocol currently in place for the management of HIV patients. Tr. at 531:16-8. Hepatitis C Virus ("HCV") has reached epidemic proportions by infecting 4,828 inmates or close to a third of the total population. Tr. at 1165:20-1166:4. Yet, there were only 117 inmates undergoing treatment for that condition during the last quarter of fiscal year 2002-03. Tr. at 659:6-10.

Dr. Mena attempted to explain the abysmal disproportion between those numbers by testifying that 73.4% of the infected inmates did not meet the established treatment criteria. Tr. at 660:1-6. However, Dr. Jones clarified during his cross-examination that that figure did not mean that those inmates would never meet the criteria. Tr. at 1170:4-8.

A pilot study conducted in the West Detention Center during the last quarter of 2001-2002 found that almost a quarter (23%) of all HCV inmates did not meet the treatment criteria although they did have elevated liver enzymes twice in a period less than 6 months. Based on those findings and in light of the disease's progression, Dr. Jones opined that he would expect a high number of those inmates to have elevated liver enzymes when tested after the 6 months threshold period, thus becoming eligible for treatment. Tr. at 1175:14-1176:3. Dr. Jones further opined that those patients would have to be followed-up closely and that treatment should be initiated immediately after they met the criteria. Tr. at 1176:6-14. Although Dr. Jones testified that he understood that the required, close follow-up was being provided, he could not offer a satisfactory explanation of why the most current data at the CHP concerning the HCV epidemic was more than six-months-old, dating back to April of 2003. Tr. at 1172:7-1174:7. Meanwhile, deaths caused by HCV increased fourfold in 2002, jumping to 12 from the 3 deaths that occurred in both 2000 and 2001. Exhibit 14. The number of deaths caused by HCV as of September 30, 2003 has already doubled each of the totals for 2000 and 2001. Id.

While inmate mortality rates are on the rise, the CHP is not addressing that phenomenon with the sense of urgency that the situation requires. Inmate deaths up-surged in 2002 to 73 from 50 in 2001 and 47 in 2000. Exhibit 14. That is roughly a 25% increase over the two preceding years. Tr. at 1059:21-1060:8. Inmate deaths as of September 30, 2003 have already surpassed the total deaths that occurred in each of 2000 and 2001.[5]

Under Puerto Rico Law, the Institute of Forensic Medicine is obliged to conduct an autopsy in each of the following set of circumstances:

(4) When the death occurs while in custody of the Police or officers of law and order; while in

330

prison, or as a result of *330 sickness or injury occurring while in prison, or suspicion thereof.

. . . . .

(6) When it is due to acute intoxication with alcohol, narcotics, or any other type of drug or controlled substances or suspicion of such.

(7) When it is due to suicide or suspicion of such.

34 LPRA § 3011. Even though Puerto Rico law requires autopsies under these circumstances, autopsies are not routinely practiced upon persons who die while incarcerated and it appears that the CHP does nothing to compel the Forensic Science Institute to observe this requirement. Tr. at 1111:10-12, 1071:20-1072:13, 1073:14-20, 1105:14-1106:13. No doubt this hinders the CHP's ability to fully review the medical circumstances surrounding deaths which occur within the system. Although Dr. Jones generally opined that the CHP was properly monitoring, investigating and addressing the increased inmate mortality rate, he was forced to admit that the Annual Report of the Central Level Quality Assurance Committee for fiscal year 2002-03 did not discuss or mention the topic as it should have had. Tr. at 1129:6-1130:8. He further admitted that he did not verify whether appropriate mortality review documents are compiled by the CHP. Tr. at 1125:6-14, 1127:15-1128:4.

Pursuant to paragraph 70 of the Medical Health Plan, one of the matters that the Quality Assurance Committee must evaluate and monitor is precisely inmate mortalities. ("At a minimum, the Quality Assurance Committee shall review inmate mortalities...") Although the latter have been increasing since 2002, the Defendant did not present a shred of evidence that would permit the Court to infer that the situation is being adequately addressed. Quite to the contrary, the Quality Assurance Committee, which is supposed to hold quarterly meetings, did not meet during the April, May and June quarter of 2003. Tr. at 516:13-25. In fact, there was a dramatic increase in withdrawal deaths in 2002, jumping from a stable trend of 1 or 2 per year to 9 in 2002 and 6 during the first nine months of 2003. Tr. at 1060:16-22, 1068:19-25, 1069:3-11. Even though Defendant's expert, based on his interviews with clinicians, concluded that the rise in these deaths is due to a new designer drug, Fentanyl, Tr. at 1063:10-17, 1066:9-14, 1068:14-17, from his own testimony it appears that the CHP has taken no precautions to alert medical personnel throughout the system of this increased risk. Tr. at 1187:10-19. And the failure to do death review properly increases the probability of never finding out whether the hypothetical Fentanyl or other designer or vulgar drugs are causing the deaths.
Wellness clinics, yet another requirement of the Medical Plan, are not performed at satisfactory levels as admitted by Dr. Mena. During fiscal year 2002-03 the overall compliance rate fluctuated from 29% in the first quarter, to 36% in the second quarter, 29% in the third quarter and 14% in the last quarter of the year. Tr. at 644.
The CHP continues to have serious problems with retrieving medical records, especially in cases of readmissions. During fiscal year 2002-03, there were 3,997 inmates re-admitted to the AOC system. CHP retrieved the records for only 1,315 of them. This means that the medical records of 2,682 re-admitted inmates were not found. That is, CHP was able to retrieve the medical records for only 29.2% of the re-admitted inmate population during the fiscal year ended on June 30, 2003. Tr. at 1265:15-1268:10. Once again the Secretary has had recourse to the private sector to alleviate the missing-records problem and hired Iron Mountain, Inc. to organize records.
331 *331 The CHP is still suffering from a shortage of psychiatrists. Tr. at 836:4-10. This is particularly critical at Guerrero, which is not only an intake center but has a psychosocial unit. Tr. at 121:2-14, 240:13-17, 432:20-25, 613:20-614:5, 705:23-24. Guerrero has been without the services of a psychiatrist for several months. Tr. at 614:1-5. In fact, although staffing is much better than it once was, there continue to be generally some important gaps in terms of required professional medical staff. Tr. at 524:1-5, 525:15-19, 613:17-24, 614:1-5, 836:4-10, 885:21-886:7, 1090:10-16, 1156:19-24.
In 1997, psychiatric and mental health services reached only 25% of the inmates in need of them. In 2003, the situation has improved, since, according to Dr. Guzmán's most recent estimates, the CHP is reaching 60% of the inmates in need of psychiatric and mental health care. Tr. at 842:14-18. However, the current level is still far short of the 95% targeted rate. Morales Feliciano, 13 F.Supp.2d, at 179.
The critical nature of the problems still confronted by inmates whose health is seriously jeopardized because of the way medical services are administered by the CHP and the AOC is attested to by the significant number of grievances filed by them pursuant to the administrative remedies procedure of the CHP. Tr. at 1178:7-10, Ex. 19. And the CHP directs complainants to file a grievance with the Administration of Corrections.
THE REMEDY
Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act ("PLRA"), "Prospective relief shall not terminate if the court makes written findings based on the record that prospective relief remains necessary to correct a current and ongoing violation of the Federal right, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right, and that the prospective relief is narrowly drawn and the least intrusive means to correct the violation." 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b) (3).
What must be first considered and borne in mind in dealing with health care in this case is that the Administration of Corrections runs a "mixed" jail/prison incarceration system with prisoners locked up in forty (40) institutions dispersed throughout the length and breadth of Puerto Rico: some are grouped in "complexes" of five or six

institutions near important urban centers (Río Piedras, Bayamón, Ponce) and some are isolated and near nothing much by way of hospital and specialist availability. There are five admission, intake facilities at Río Piedras, Bayamón, Vega Alta, Ponce and Guerrero. The second consideration that must be taken into account is the longstanding, documented time and again history of noncompliance with Court orders.[6] Compliance and care are in direct inverse proportion to the seriousness of these constitutionally deep-rooted rights of the plaintiff class. The frequency of transfers added up to those factors make it necessary for the Court to fashion and grant system-wide relief.

The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995, dismembered and codified in various titles of the United States Code, sets a Sphinx's question for courts and litigants who must seek and order relief for violations of jail and prison inmates' constitutional rights: § 3626 of Title 18, at various places requires the parties not to request, and orders 332 that the courts of the United States "shall not grant or approve any prospective relief unless the court finds *332 that such relief is [simultaneously] narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right and is the least intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the federal right." Additionally, "the court shall give substantial weight to any adverse impact on public safety or the operation of a criminal justice system caused by the relief." § 3626(a) and (b) passim. This language mimics long standing requirements for injunctive relief under Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Referred to in the cases as the "need-narrowness-intrusiveness findings" this is the old "over broadness" doctrine used to measure garden variety injunctive relief under Rule 65.

A decade before the PLRA was enacted, Federal courts had well settled doctrines and standards on the issuance of equitable relief. It is well worth quoting in extenso from Toussaint v. McCarthy, 801 F.2d 1080, 1086-1087 (9th Cir.1986) which discusses pre-PLRA standards and doctrines in relation to constitutional violations by state actors in contextualized language:

We agree with the Fifth Circuit's description of the role of the federal courts. Injunctive relief against a state agency or official must be no broader than necessary to remedy the constitutional violation. See Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 280, 97 S.Ct. 2749, 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977) (remedy must be related to condition alleged to offend the constitution); Swann v. CharlotteMecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 16, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971) (task is to correct, by a balancing of the interests, the condition that offends the constitution; judicial powers may be exercised only on the basis of a constitutional violation); Hoptowit v. Spellman, 753 F.2d 779, 785 (9th Cir.1985) (judge must order correction of specific violations and may require only that these corrections bring the conditions above constitutional minima); Newman v. Alabama, 683 F.2d 1312, 1319 (11th Cir.1982) (relief must be no broader than necessary to remedy the constitutional violation), cert. denied, 460 U.S. 1083, 103 S.Ct. 1773, 76 L.Ed.2d 346 (1983); Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d 1237, 1246 (9th Cir.1982) (function of court is limited to determining whether a constitutional violation has occurred and to fashioning a remedy that does no more and no less than correct that particular constitutional violation); Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d at 1144-46 (court must fashion the least intrusive remedy that will still be effective). "The federal courts do not sit to supervise state prisons, the administration of which is of acute interest to the States." Meachum v. Fano, 427 U.S. 215, 229, 96 S.Ct. 2532, 49 L.Ed.2d 451 (1976).

In fashioning a remedy for constitutional violations, a federal court must order effective relief. Smith v. Sullivan, 611 F.2d 1039, 1044 (5th Cir.1980). Therefore, a federal court may order relief that the Constitution would not of its own force initially require if such relief is necessary to remedy a constitutional violation. See North Carolina State Board of Education v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43, 46, 91 S.Ct. 1284, 28 L.Ed.2d 586 (1971); Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15-16, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554. A defendant's history of noncompliance with prior court orders is a relevant factor in determining the necessary scope of an effective remedy. Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 687, 98 S.Ct. 2565, 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978); Hoptowit v. Ray, 682 F.2d at 1247; Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d at 1155-56. [Emphasis added.]

However, our goal is to cure only constitutional violations. Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board

333

of Education, 402 U.S. at 16, 91 S.Ct. 1267; Wright v. Rushen, 642 F.2d 1129, 1133-34 (9th *333

Cir.1981). The commission of a federal judge is not a "general assignment to go about doing good." Jett v. Castaneda, 578 F.2d 842, 845 (9th Cir.1978). Accordingly, injunctive restraints that exceed constitutional minima must be narrowly tailored to prevent repetition of proved constitutional violations, and must not intrude unnecessarily on state functions. Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d at 1156. See generally Mishkin, Federal Courts as State Reformers, 35 Wash. & Lee L.Rev. 949 (1978).
The Ninth Circuit is blunter:
Although the PLRA significantly affects the type of prospective injunctive relief that may be awarded, it has not substantially changed the threshold findings and standards required to justify an injunction. To this extent we agree with the Sixth Circuit [sic] that "the (PLRA) merely codifies existing law and does not change the standards for determining whether to grant an injunction." Smith v. Ark. Dept. of Correction, 103 F.3d 637, 647 (8th Cir.1996).
Gomez v. Vernon, 255 F.3d 1118, 1130 (9th Cir.2001).
Finding the "need 0907 narrowness 0907 intrusiveness" equation in a given case seems a gamble in the absence of contextuality and lends itself to gross linguistic, two-level manipulation. The Second Circuit provides an example in Benjamin v. Fraser, 343 F.3d 35, 53-54 (2d Cir.2003):
The City also contests as overly broad and burdensome the court's requirement that all windows designed to be opened must be operational. Contending that under the PLRA the district court was obliged to consider the utility of each window individually, the City observes:
The effect of a window defect depends upon the nature and degree of the defect, and the nature of the housing area, as well as the outside temperature. For example, a single window in a dayroom or modular unit that is stuck open a crack in mild weather, or one window that will not open among many windows that are operational in a particular area, will not cause unconstitutional conditions in that area. (Def. Br. at 48).
But it is ironic that the City, which strenuously opposes the OCC's continued participation, invokes the PLRA, which was intended in part to prevent judicial micro-management, in support of the proposition that the district court was required to examine every window. We agree with the district court that a comprehensive repair program would be more effective and less intrusive than an individual review of each window at the various facilities.
Although the PLRA's requirement that relief be "narrowly drawn" and "necessary" to correct the violation might at first glance seem to equate permissible remedies with constitutional minimums, a remedy may require more than the bare minimum the Constitution would permit and yet still be necessary and narrowly drawn to correct the violation. Given the impracticability of the court examining each window, ordering comprehensive repairs was a necessary and narrowly drawn means of effectuating relief-even though the Constitution would certainly permit a broken window or two.
See also Jones Él v. Berge, 164 F.Supp.2d 1096, 1096-1116 (W.D.Wis.2001), citing Smith v. Arkansas Dept. of Correction, 103 F.3d 637, 647 (8th Cir.1996) (preliminary injunction standard not changed.)
In this case three quite different remedies to the long-standing, current and ongoing violations of plaintiffs' health care constitutional rights have been presented. The defendants propose themselves, in the face of historical, 334 systematic failure and current and ongoing massive violations: hope that peripheral improvements continue *334 and maybe, sometime in the future, plaintiffs will actually receive health care. The defendants' own evidence established that as of today a quarter of those who request sick calls do not get them, and half of those who must travel to extrainstitutional appointments, which are ordered in serious cases of medical need, do not make it to the appointment. Half of prisoners who must be moved intrainstitutionally do not make their appointments and the CHP does not reach 40% of prisoners in need of mental health care. In spite of higher levels of budgeting and staffing the defendants still cannot provide care to their charges. The most daunting of the reasons, the principal

reason offered by the defendants' evidence is the utter inability of the Correctional Health Program, which depends on the Department of Health, to coordinate with the Administration of Corrections for custody and transportation. This particular institutional failure exists ever since the Department of Health took over by court order and interagency agreement the responsibility for the delivery of health care to persons under the custody of the Administration of Corrections. Under Commonwealth law the Administration of Corrections is charged with the responsibility for prisoners' health care. 4 LPRA § 1112(f).[7]
In 1997 the Court commissioned an expert witness, Vincent M. Nathan, Esq. to prepare reports on compliance with the then extant remedial orders and to submit the health care report first of all. The expert witness complied and proposed that correctional health care be placed in a receivership because the Correctional Health Program could not deliver. The plaintiffs opposed the creation of a receivership and proposed the creation of a private notfor-profit corporation as an alternative remedy. The defendants opposed both the receivership and the not-forprofit corporation in their historical denial of reality. After two weeks of hearings an agreement between the parties was reached and a joint request was presented to the Court to allow the development and to fund the organization of a nonprofit corporation. Morales Feliciano v. Rossello Gonzalez, 13 F.Supp.2d 151 (D.P.R.1998).
The Court granted in 1998 a necessary remedy and among the three alternatives chose the creation of a nonprofit corporation proposed jointly by the parties as the least intrusive and most narrowly drawn. The very fact that the defendants chose to join the plaintiffs in selecting this remedy would seem to mean 0907 and must be taken to mean 0907 that they understood it to be precisely tailored to the needs of the occasion, that it is narrowly drawn and least intrusive 0907 in fact not intrusive at all.[8]
335 *335 It is not happenstance that so many of the violations shown by the defendants' proof at the present hearings have to do with delays in transportation to outside appointments. The CHP is over-dependent on the use of the Puerto Rico Medical Center for hospital and specialist services. This was to be expected. The CHP depended in 1997, as it depends now, on outside hospital facilities and specialist services: for decades indigents and then prisoners had depended on the services rendered by the Department of Health through AFASS (Administration for Health Facilities and Services). In 1993 the structures and economy of hospital and health services began to change, and dramatically so.
With the approval of the Puerto Rico Health Insurance Act in September 1993, 24 LPRA 7000 et seq. the dependence on the Department of Health for uninsured indigents began to crumble away and as the Health Reform progressed throughout the decade it became obvious that it was best to place prison inmates in the hands of the Administration of Corrections and a not-for-profit corporation than to leave them stranded as the sole charges of a Department of Health denuded of health care capabilities: this became critical when AFASS was dissolved and public, especially regional, hospitals were sold.
The Legislative Intent of the Puerto Rico Health Insurance Act, 24 LPRA § 7001 of 1993 has an eerie resemblance to the reform history of this case, in part it reads:
From the beginning of this century, Puerto Rico's public policy has revolved around the attitude that the Government has the responsibility of offering direct health services.
Pursuant to such policy, two health systems have evolved which are notably unequal. In general terms, we can state that the quality of health care in Puerto Rico has come to depend predominantly on the financial capability of the person to cover the cost thereof with his/her own resources.
Within this scheme, the Department of Health has assumed the care of the medically-indigent sector of our population. The well-intended efforts of its officials have not been sufficient to counter the adverse effects which factors such as the following have had on the quality of the Department's services: budget insufficiency; increasing costs of technology and medical supplies; bureaucracy and government centralization; and political partisan interference with its efforts. [Emphasis added.]

Since 1967, there have been several attempts in Puerto Rico to reform medical-hospital services offered by the Department. However, it has not been possible to narrow the ever growing gap between the quality of public and private services.
This history of failing reform is what this case's long history of health care violations parallels.
The remedies fashioned by the court to correct the constitutional violations pertaining to Plaintiffs rights in the area of medical and mental health care have run the gamut from general injunctions, to more specific injunctions, to detailed and itemized plans, to pertinent modifications fine tuning particular portions of those plans, to complementary orders addressed to particular obstacles to the delivery of adequate care to inmates, to, finally, the 1998 Opinion and Order which attempts to alter the way mental and medical health services to inmates are 336 delivered, in order to make this delivery more efficient and competitive. All of this in an effort to *336 correct what continues to be the unconstitutional manner in which inmates' health care is provided or not provided at all in the AOC. The record of this case demonstrates that pre-1997 efforts to correct current and ongoing constitutional violations in the medical area, have failed. It is, therefore, indisputable that in order to be effective, it is necessary that the relief ordered by this court reach out for new solutions. Instead of the relief proposed by the court's expert in 1997, receivership, this court approved the less intrusive remedy proposed in the joint proposal of 1997 to create the Correctional Health Services Corporation. This was and continues to extend no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right, and is narrowly drawn and constitutes the least intrusive means to correct the violation. See 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b)(3).
The best remedy was and remains a nonprofit corporation which when finally operational can work in the new private medical and health services economy. The defendants' evidence shows beyond speculation that right now the CHP depends at a disadvantage on the private sector on everything from lab testing and record storage and retrieval to medical and nursing personnel. Tr. at 552:2-5, 554:8-9, 601:1-24, 680:23-681:22. This is done in an ad hoc, helter-skelter way, as the need arises and failure is specifically disastrous 0907 a psychiatrist is missing at the Guerrero facility which is supposed to operate two programs for mental health patients and addicts (La Posada 0907 a psychosocial unit 0907 and intake) and a pharmacist at Zarzal. Tr. at 121:2-14, 240:13-17, 432:20-25, 613:20-614:5, 705:23-24. The Corporation can contract with the Administration of Corrections to provide services and plan: at present the Corporation, for example, has developed a telemedicine program to provide psychiatric services at Guerrero to correct for the impoverished availability of mental health personnel in the Western half of Puerto Rico. Tr. at 503:9-12. Thus, the creation of the not-for-profit corporation will lead to the restoration of the AOC's authority under Commonwealth law as the provider of health care to inmates, eliminate the present and intolerable duality in authority, and discharge the Secretary of Health from his court-imposed responsibilities.
The Court has financed through the use of fine funds the development of a modern health care services infrastructure: computerized health records to solve the age old danger of the untransported or lost charts and the treatment disasters that tens of thousands of expedientillos or temporary records produced; the system is scheduled to begin in April 2004. Tr. at 670:18-671:1. The Corporation is now at an acute point in the training of personnel to use that system and to abort that development would cause imminent and grievous harm to the plaintiffs by perpetuating a patently unconstitutional denial of their health care.
The only intrusion the Corporation represents is the need to access information and the attendance of personnel at training sessions. The need to remedy constitutional violations which are current and ongoing in undisputable and legally mandated. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); North Carolina State Board of Education v. Swann, 402 U.S. 43, 91 S.Ct. 1284, 28 L.Ed.2d 586 (1971); Swann v. CharlotteMecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). If Federal courts are to exercise the judicial power of the United States, then they must provide a remedy to a plaintiff who complains about and proves violations of his constitutional rights when a case and controversy is properly presented within 337 the court's jurisdiction. The court cannot understand how the work *337 performed by the Corporation is either overintrussive or overbroad: access to records has worked out so well that there is now a computerized systemwide network due to begin operations as soon as personnel are trained. And the few hours needed to train personnel is an intrusion de minimis compared to the health care benefits that will accrue to the plaintiff class. The government has not done it, the Corporation has.

The Corporation is not meant to have an exclusive, perennial right to deliver health care to prisoners. Once organized and structured it will compete in a free market with others. One or two years of Court overseen contracting will prepare the Administration of Corrections 0907 under Commonwealth law the government agency responsible for prison health care 0907 for the task of negotiating with the private sector and making whatever choice is legally available.
The parties were instructed at the beginning of the hearing on these matters that they should limit their evidence to the existence or not of constitutional violations to the members of Plaintiff Class. Tr. at 172:2-9. Defendant wishes, further, to present evidence on the necessary-narrow-least intrusive inquiry. Tr. at 171:10-21. Given the severe time constraints imposed by the PLRA, and the potentially unnecessary delay in the implementation of much needed improvements generated by the CHSC, and the halting of functions already provided by the CHSC, the Court requested that Defendant Rullán make a proffer as to the evidence he wishes to present in this regard. Tr. at 1321:2-13. Based on the proffer made by Defendant Rullán in open Court, the evidence he wishes to present in this regard will add nothing to the inquiry this Court must make in order to resolve defendant Rullán's PLRA motion, it is simply irrelevant.
When first asked to make a proffer, Defendant responded through counsel with a generalized allegation that, "the Corporation is not the least intrusive remedy because they, as of this date have not provided the type of medical services that are being provided by the Correctional Health program" Tr. at 1321:21-24. When doing nothing is "intrusive" was not explained and the assertion was made in bad faith. The Corporation's development is behind schedule but it has already provided computer equipment and established an interinstitutional communication network at the central level, and contributes with the administrative part in purchases, personnel and in accounting and finance and in addition, to medical billing, according to Dr. Mena's testimony. Tr. 502-503. When the court insisted upon the specifics, Defendant stated that he wished to take discovery on the matter. Tr. at 1322:7-15. Why Defendant could not have prepared himself by taking discovery prior to filing the PLRA motion rather than burdening this court's already constrained time to issue a decision on his PLRA motion was not explained.[9] Regardless of whatever need may exist to obtain particularized facts in order to more efficiently present their evidence, the matters Defendant Rullán proposes to conduct discovery on have no bearing on the issues to be decided by this court. Rather, it appears that Defendant Rullán wishes to conduct a smear campaign in an effort to show that the persons operating the CHSC are corrupt or somehow morally reprehensible and/or incompetent and that the CHSC is not ready at present to provide the necessary health care 0907 a point which is 338 not disputed *338 by any one since the CHSC has not completed its organization.
The presentation of such evidence is unnecessary to the court because it in no way addresses the question of whether the challenged relief is "narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right, and is the least intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right." Rather, the evidence Defendant Rullán wishes to present is directed to whether the CHSC is operating as it should in light of state law requirements and the orders of this Court.[10] None of the factual matter specified by Defendant Rullán in his proffer suggest any need for alarm; but if Defendant Rullán has concerns about how the CHSC is being operated, etc., he should feel free to bring those to the Court's attention in order to request that the Court take steps to address those concerns. These facts do not, however, render the relief entered by the Court in 1998 more intrusive, less narrow or less necessary; nor do they implicate any serious need to modify that relief.
On January 14, 2004 a unanimous Supreme Court decided Frew, et al v. Hawkins, 540 U.S. ___, 124 S.Ct. 899, 157 L.Ed.2d 855 (2004).[11] The Court stated the controversy involved thus: "Judicial enforcement of [a] 1996 consent decree is the subject of the present dispute. The decree is a detailed document about 80 pages long that orders a comprehensive plan for implementing the federal statute. In contrast with the brief and general mandate in the statute itself, the consent decree requires the state officials to implement many specific procedures". Frew, at ___, 124 S.Ct. at 902. The Court further explained: "To ensure the enforcement of federal law, however, the Eleventh Amendment permits suits for prospective injunctive relief against state officials acting in violation of federal law. Ex Parte Young, [209 U.S. 123, 28 S.Ct. 441, 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908)]. This standard allows courts to order prospective relief see Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 39 L.Ed.2d 662 (1974); Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 97 S.Ct. 2749, 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977), as well as measures ancillary to appropriate prospective relief, Green v. Mansour, 474 U.S. 64, 71-73, 106 S.Ct. 423, 88 L.Ed.2d 371 (1985) [...]"

The Court then goes on to describe the nature of a consent decree in terms that fit nicely the issues before the court:

Consent decrees have elements of both contracts and judicial decrees. Local Number 93,

Firefighters v. Cleveland, 478 U.S. 501, 519, 106 S.Ct. 3063, 92 L.Ed.2d 405(1986). A consent

decree "embodies an agreement of the parties" and is also "an agreement that the parties desire

and expect will be reflected in, and be enforceable as, a judicial decree that is subject to the rules

generally applicable to other judgments and decrees." Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502

U.S. 367, 378, 112 S.Ct. 748, 116 L.Ed.2d 867 (1992). Consent decrees entered in federal court

must be directed to protecting federal interests. In Firefighters, we observed that a federal consent

decree must spring from, and serve to resolve, a dispute within the court's subject-matter

339

jurisdiction; must come within the general scope of the case made by the pleadings; and *339

must further the objectives of the law upon which the complaint was based. 478 U.S., at 525, 106

S.Ct. 3063.

Frew, at ___, 124 S.Ct. at 903. This is especially pertinent to the court's decision because the joint proposal, the court's approval in May 1998 and subsequent orders brings this matter within the Firefighters doctrine. In Frew the Court went on to restate the obvious: "Federal courts are not reduced to approving consent decrees and hoping for compliance. Once entered, a consent decree may be enforced." 540 U.S. at ___, 124 S.Ct. at 905.

Finally the Court teaches

When a federal court has entered a consent decree under Ex parte Young, the law's primary response to these concerns has its source not in the Eleventh Amendment but in the court's equitable powers and the direction given by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In particular, Rule 60(b)(5) allows a party to move for relief if "it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application." The Rule encompasses the traditional power of a court of equity to modify its decree in light of changed circumstances. In Rufo v. Inmates of Suffolk County Jail, 502 U.S. 367, 112 S.Ct. 748, 116 L.Ed.2d 867 (1992), the Court explored the application of the Rule to consent decrees involving institutional reform. The Court noted that district courts should apply a "flexible standard" to the modification of consent decrees when a significant change in facts or law warrants their amendment. Id., at 393, 112 S.Ct. 748. See also Philadelphia Welfare Rights Org. v. Shapp, 602 F.2d 1114 (C.A.3 1979) (modifying consent decree implementing Pennsylvania's EPSDT program in light of changed circumstances).

Rufo rejected the idea that the institutional concerns of government officials were "only marginally relevant" when officials moved to amend a consent decree, and noted that "principles of federalism and simple common sense require the [district] court to give significant weight" to the views of government officials. 502 U.S., at 392, n. 14, 112 S.Ct. 748. When a suit under Ex parte Young requires a detailed order to ensure compliance with a decree for prospective relief, and the decree in effect mandates the State, through its named officials, to administer a significant federal program, principles of federalism require that state officials with front-line responsibility for administering the program be given latitude and substantial discretion.

The federal court must exercise its equitable powers to ensure that when the objects of the decree have been attained, responsibility for discharging the State's obligations is returned promptly to the State and its officials. As public servants, the officials of the State must be presumed to have a high degree of competence in deciding how best to discharge their governmental responsibilities. A State, in the ordinary course, depends upon successor officials, both appointed and elected, to bring new insights and solutions to problems of allocating revenues and resources. The basic obligations of federal law may remain the same, but the precise manner of their discharge may not. If the State establishes reason to modify the decree, the court should make the necessary changes; where it has not done so, however, the decree should be enforced according to its terms.

Frew, 540 U.S. at ___ - ___, 124 S.Ct. at 905-06. The Secretary, however, has not moved for modification but for termination.
340 The court has no doubt that the moving defendant's own evidence establishes *340 that the Correctional Health Program is still malfunctioning, that the medical and mental health Plans are not nearly being complied with and that egregious and systematic violations of plaintiffs federal, constitutional rights to health care are being violated. The CHCC is still necessary: the Correctional Health Program of the Department of Health is simply not doing the job. The Administration of Corrections is blamed and the AOC by itself is not prepared to take over the task. The Corporation has been developing systems and can continue to help along the agency charged by Commonwealth law to do the job.
Far from proving Defendant Rullán's case, the evidence presented shows that there currently continue to be ongoing constitutional violations of the rights of Plaintiff Class in the areas of medical and mental health care and that Defendant is not in compliance with the Medical and Mental Health Care Plan. Plaintiffs request that, based on the evidence presented by Defendant, judgment be entered denying Defendant's PLRA Motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c).
APPLICABLE LAW
The duty of prison authorities to incarcerated inmates is well settled law. The Eighth Amendment prohibits punishments which are incompatible with "the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society," Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 100-101, 78 S.Ct. 590, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958); Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349, 378, 30 S.Ct. 544, 54 L.Ed. 793 (1910), or which "involve the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain," Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 173, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976). Government officials are therefore required by the Constitution to provide medical care to those who are incarcerated:
An inmate must rely on prison authorities to treat his medical needs; if the authorities fail to do so, those needs will not be met. In the worst cases, such a failure may actually produce physical "torture or a lingering death," the evils of most immediate concern to the drafters of the Amendment. In less serious cases, denial of medical care may result in pain and suffering which no one suggests would serve any penological purpose. The infliction of such unnecessary suffering is inconsistent with contemporary standards of decency as manifested in modern legislation codifying the commonlaw view that "it is but just that the public be required to care for the prisoner, who cannot by reason of the deprivation of his liberty, care for himself."
We therefore conclude that deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of prisoners constitutes the "unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain," proscribed by the Eighth Amendment. This is true whether the indifference is manifested by prison doctors in their response to the prisoner's needs or by prison guards in intentionally denying or delaying access to medical care or intentionally interfering with the treatment once prescribed. Regardless of how evidenced, deliberate indifference to a prisoner's serious illness or injury states a cause of action under § 1983.
Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 103-106, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (citations and footnotes omitted). Thus, it is required that mental, see Torraco v. Maloney, 923 F.2d 231, 234 (1st Cir.1991) (citations omitted) (there is "[n]o underlying distinction between the right to medical care for physical ills and its psychological or psychiatric counterpart."') and medical health services be provided at a level reasonably commensurate with modern medical science and of a quality acceptable within prudent professional standards. U.S. v. DeCologero, 821 F.2d 39, 43 341 (1st Cir.1987). A lack of funds will not excuse *341 the failure of correctional systems to maintain a certain minimum level of medical service necessary to avoid the imposition of cruel and unusual punishment. Harris v. Thigpen, 941 F.2d 1495 (11th Cir.1991).
A constitutional violation is therefore established when government officials show deliberate indifference to those medical needs which have been diagnosed as mandating treatment, conditions which obviously require medical

attention, conditions which significantly affect an individual's daily life activities, or conditions which cause pain, discomfort or a threat to good health. Brock v. Wright, 315 F.3d 158, 162 (2nd Cir.2003); see also McNally v. Prison Health Servs., 28 F.Supp.2d 671, 673-4 (D.Maine 1998) (treatment for HIV). Accordingly, the following have been held to implicate Eighth Amendment rights in the area of mental and medical health care:

a. Neglecting to fully screen incoming inmates or to detect mental health problems. DeGidio v. Pung, 920 F.2d 525, 529-33 (8th Cir.1990); Lareau v. Manson, 651 F.2d 96, 109 (2nd Cir.1981); Inmates of Occoquan v. Barry, 717 F.Supp. 854 (D.D.C.1989).

b. Failing to provide a sick call system that ensures access to care and that is capable of effectively handling emergencies. Bass v. Wallenstein, 769 F.2d 1173 (7th Cir.1985).

c. Failure to take steps to minimize the risk of inmate suicide, see generally, Partridge v. Two Unknown Police Officers, 791 F.2d 1182 (5th Cir.1986), and appropriate treatment for suicidal patients, Comstock v. McCrary, 273 F.3d 693 (6th Cir.2001).

d. "[I]nterfering with the treatment once prescribed." Estelle, 429 U.S at 105, 97 S.Ct. 285. Examples of this form of deliberate indifference are

i. the failure to appropriately administer necessary medication, Montgomery v. Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492 (3rd Cir.2002) (HIV); Wynn v. Southward, 251 F.3d 588 (7th Cir.2001) (heart medication); Roberson v. Bradshaw, 198 F.3d 645 (8th Cir.1999) (diabetes);

ii. the failure to provide transportation to scheduled specialty appointments and other therapy, Kaminsky v. Rosenblum, 929 F.2d 922 (2nd Cir.1991); Waldrop v. Evans, 871 F.2d 1030 (11th Cir.1989); and

iii. The failure to provide prescribed medical diets. Roberson v. Bradshaw, 198 F.3d 645 (8th Cir.1999); Kyle v. Allen, 732 F.Supp. 1157 (S.D.Fla.1990).

e. Delays in diagnosing and administering appropriate treatment. Clement v. Gomez, 298 F.3d 898 (9th Cir.2002); H.C. v. Jarrard, 786 F.2d 1080 (11th Cir.1986)

f. The failure to provide appropriate post surgical care. Boretti v. Wiscomb, 930 F.2d 1150 (6th Cir.1991); Wood v. Sunn, 865 F.2d 982 (9th Cir.1988).

g. Cohabitation of severely mentally ill patients with the general population without being tendered any type of mental health treatment, Cortes-Quinones v. Jimenez Nettleship, 842 F.2d 556, 560-61 (1st Cir.1988).

h. Failure to provide a sick call system that ensures the needed care. Bass by Lewis v. Wallenstein, 769 F.2d 1173 (7th Cir.1985).

i. Failure to provide adequate facilities and equipment. Langley v. Coughlin, 888 F.2d 252 (2nd Cir.1989), Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Wecht, 874 F.2d 147 (3rd Cir.1989).

j. Inadequate record keeping and records management which are critically important to the

342

continuity of medical care, otherwise, the possibility for disaster is created. Montgomery v. *342

Pinchak, 294 F.3d 492 (3rd Cir.2002); Miranda v. Munoz, 770 F.2d 255 (1st Cir.1985).

These and other wrongs of constitutional import have been found by this Court to exist and to constitute violations of the rights of the Plaintiff Class as set out in this Court's Opinion and Order of 18 May 1998. Morales Feliciano v. Rossello Gonzalez, 13 F.Supp.2d 151, 179 (D.P.R.1998). The historical systemic indifference to inmates' medical and mental health needs and the institutional failures which up to this day continue to threaten the health and the medical safety and well-being of the Plaintiff Class require the continued operation of relief granted in favor of the Class as well as the continued supervision of this Court. See generally, LaMarca v. Turner, 995 F.2d 1526 (11th Cir.1993).

Based on the evidence presented by Defendants there can be no doubt that all of the above conditions continue to prevail at AOC. These demonstrate that relief remains necessary to address current and ongoing constitutional violations in the areas of medical and mental health care.
The Medical and Mental Health Plans unequivocally impose a joint responsibility upon both the AOC and the Department of Health for the delivery of health care to the inmates. See ¶ 1 of the Medical Plan. The Plans further require interdepartmental cooperation between both agencies to achieve its goals. See ¶ 4 of the Medical Plan. By doing so, the Medical and Mental Health Plans adopted the principles of cooperation, trust and teamwork between the medical and correctional components of a prison system that are required under every set of standards, be it the Constitution, ACA or NCCHC, to be able to provide timely and adequate medical services to the inmates. Tr. at 1096-97.
When this restructuring of responsibilities, agreed to and voluntarily undertaken by all parties involved, was initiated, it involved executive and administrative orders issued by state officials under state law to transfer primary healthcare responsibilities to the Secretary of Health. See e.g. Ex. D. These orders were issued pursuant to and under the authority of a consent decree. Simply put, under the Constitution and Medical and Mental Health Plans the AOC and the DOH are partners or co-venturers in the delivery of the medical and mental health services to the Plaintiff Class. Wilson v. Town of Mendon, 294 F.3d 1, 14-15 (1st Cir.2002) (Joint venture theory succeeds where a defendant "`associated himself with the venture, participated in it as something he wished to bring about, and sought by his actions to make it succeed.'"); see also cases relating t joint liability under § 1983 Northington v. Marin, 102 F.3d 1564 (10th Cir.1996); Weeks v. Chaboudy, 984 F.2d 185 (6th Cir.1993); Finch v. City of Vernon, 877 F.2d 1497 (11th Cir.1989).
Hence, Defendant Rullán's pretension of putting the blame for the serious and pervasive access problems, the sheer inadequacy of the physical facilities and the failure to provide medical diets exclusively on the shoulders of the AOC, fails as a matter of law.
As discussed above, based on the record of this case and on the evidence brought before the Court the relief relating to the CHSC was and continues to extend no further than necessary to correct the violation of the federal right, and is narrowly drawn and constitutes the least intrusive means to correct the violation. 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b) (3).
PLAINTIFFS' CROSS MOTION
In their opposition to Defendant's Motion the plaintiff class cross-moved to terminate two sections of the Medical 343 Plan assigning the primary responsibility of inmates *343 health care to the Department of Health so that
responsibility would return to the Administration of Correction, which is the agency designated by Commonwealth law to provide medical, dental and mental health services to the inmate population, 4 LPRA § 1112(f). By returning to the Administration of Corrections the plaintiffs seek to unify responsibility and accountability. At present the Secretary of Health blames the Administrator of Corrections for his flagrant failures and nothing, it seems, can be done to make both agencies work together. The Defendant joins the plaintiffs. Typically the defendants join because, in any case, they will continue the same disastrous present arrangements by interagency agreement as a matter of "public policy".[12] They will of course do so at their peril. The defendants and their counsel have not brought forth any basis for this unknown public policy.
The plaintiffs' request is framed thus:
The scheme set up to place control and responsibility in the DOH has not worked because of conflicting patterns of authority and command lines. For years on end the conflict has survived even when the defendants have called on the Court's authority to help out. The plaintiffs continue to suffer, as shown above, by such inter-departmental conflicts. The plaintiffs must request that the Court terminate Part I(A)(1) and (2) of the Medical Plan. The plaintiffs also move that all orders relating to the Medical Cadre be terminated: these are Order to Implement Medical Cadre Plan, Dkt. # 6977; Order To Assign Correctional Officers to the Medical Cadre (several docket numbers

are: 7345; 7417; 7453, and 7574). Other Orders referring to budget and transitory matters touching the Medical Cadre are docket numbers 7106; 7418; 7611.
There are a number of orders requested by the parties to dispose of all kinds of problems with administration and execution of the Medical and Mental Health Plans, all of them, usually requested by defendants and plaintiffs, attend transient matters, are now useless and sometimes confusing. They are: Order that the Chief Correctional Health Care Coordinator Take All Necessary Contractual Steps to Maintain Continuity of Services to Inmates in the Custody of the Administration of Corrections, (Dkt.# 6558); Order Regarding Compensation Scale for Correctional Health Employees and Contractors (Dkt.# 6830); Order Regarding Purchase of Vehicles for Correctional Health Program (Dkt.# 6855); Order stating that Dr. Ernesto Torres Arroyo, MD as Executive Director of the Correctional Health Program shall take all necessary steps to enforce his line of authority, etc. (Dkt.# 7573); Endorsed Order of 6/30/97 regarding Joint Motion Stating the Fiscal Arrangements Which Shall Be Made to Pay for the Professional Services Contracted for by the Chief Health Care Coordinator Pursuant to the Court's order of 16 May 1997 (Dkt.# 6567).
THE MOTION TO INTERVENE
344 The Union General de Trabajadores, affiliated to the SEIU, Local 1199 on November *344 7, 2003 filed a motion to intervene under Rule 24(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to join the Secretary's motion, to argue that the privatization of services will put at risk health services and to announce the pendency of two resolutions in the Commonwealth Legislative Assembly and suggesting that it would be prudent to wait until the Senate and House investigations are over before holding hearings (Dkt.# 8523). The court took the motion under advisement and invited counsel to remain; counsel left. The Motion for intervention certainly is not timely, the Union has not specified the commonality of fact or law required by the Rule and has left in the hands of management's lawyers the unions representation. The Union's participation in this case would add nothing but complexity and confusion. The bizarre arrangement whereby the Union's interest are represented by counsel for management is unintelligible.
RULE 52 (c)
Under Rule 52(c), district courts are authorized to enter judgments based on partial findings once a party has presented its evidence with respect to a particular issue:
Judgment on Partial Findings. If during a trial without a jury a party has been fully heard on an issue and the court finds against the party on that issue, the court may enter judgment as a matter of law against that party with respect to a claim or defense that cannot under the controlling law be maintained or defeated without a favorable finding on that issue, or the court may decline to render any judgment until the close of all the evidence. Such a judgment shall be supported by findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by subdivision (a) of this rule.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c). According to Moore's, "A judgment of partial findings may be invoked when: (1) The party pursuing the claim has not demonstrated the elements of the claim either in fact or in law; or (2) the evidence of the party pursuing the claim has established one of the opposing party's defenses as a matter of fact or law." James Wm. Moore et al., Moore's Federal Practice, ¶ 52.50[2] (3d ed 2003). In this case the Rule is properly invoked on both counts: the defendant Secretary has failed to prove his allegations and has established to the satisfaction of even the PLRA, that massive numbers of plaintiffs fail to access and receive health care services for very serious conditions because the systems in place do not work.
Upon the findings and conclusions set out above IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:

(1) Defendant's Motion Under the PLRA to Vacate or Terminate the Court Relief Mandating the Transfer and Privatization of the Correctional Health Program of the Department of Health is denied.

(2) Plaintiffs' Cross Motion is granted. Therefor Part I(A)(I) and (2) of the Medical Plan is

terminated, as well as Order to Implement Medical Cadre Plan, (Dkt.# 6977) and the various

orders to assign officers to the Medical Cadre (Dkt.# 7345); (Dkt.7417); (Dkt.7453); (Dkt.7574);

(Dkt.7106); (Dkt. # 7418), and (Dkt.7611). Other orders terminated are: Order that the Chief

Correctional Health Care Coordinator Take All Necessary Contractual Steps to Maintain Continuity

of Services to Inmates in the Custody of the Administration of Corrections, (Dkt.# 6558); Order

Regarding Compensation Scale for Correctional Health Employees and Contractors (Dkt.# 6830);

Order Regarding Purchase of Vehicles for Correctional Health Program (Dkt.# 6855); Order

345

stating that Dr. Ernesto Torres Arroyo, MD as Executive Director of the *345 Correctional Health

Program shall take all necessary steps to enforce his line of authority, etc. (Dkt.# 7573); Endorsed

Order of 6/30/97 regarding Joint Motion Stating the Fiscal Arrangements Which Shall Be Made to

Pay for the Professional Services Contracted for by the Chief Health Care Coordinator Pursuant to

the Court's order of 16 May 1997 (Dkt.# 6567).

(3) The Unión de Trabajadores Motion To Intervene is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Secretary of Corrections and the plaintiff class shall meet and file with the Court within forty-five (45) days of the entry of this order a plan on how the Administrator of Corrections will assume his legal responsibility to provide health care to inmates.

[1] Although the unsigned certificate of service indicated that a copy of the PLRA Motion was served on Plaintiffs' counsel on that same date, it was not delivered to Plaintiffs' until October 8, 2003, after a telephone request by Plaintiffs' counsel. The allegedly mailed copy was never received.
[2] After his cross-examination plaintiffs moved to strike Dr. Jones' opinion testimony. The court declines to do so. Dr. Jones formally meets the criteria for delivering expert testimony. After his cross-examination, however, the court gives very little credence to those opinions.
[3] Some of these contracts do not provide full services: the CHP has a long standing contract with Clendo Laboratories to perform laboratory services: pick-up and delivery happen once a day. ("Panic" results are transmitted to the CHP by fax when the tests show results which need immediate attention.) The CHP, however, has no capacity at all to do STAT testing. Tr. At 554:18-20. STAT test results are necessary when a patient is in critical conditions that require an immediate response. Tr. At 1160:23-1161:5.
[4] Moreover, under Puerto Rico law physicians are required to make certain that their medical orders are carried out. Tr. At 900:24-901:8, 902:7-9.
[5] The accuracy of the 2003 death statistics came into question during the cross-examinations of doctors Mena and Jones. While the Mortality Report, a copy of which was admitted into evidence as plaintiffs' Exhibit 14, recorded 51 deaths until September 30, 2003, plaintiffs presented 62 death summaries for that same period, which were marked as Exhibit 16. While Dr. Mena was not able to explain the discrepancy in the numbers, Dr. Jones ventured to say that the Mortality Report only recorded deaths with a known cause. Tr. at 1122:20-1123:2, 1126:6-19; 1127:6-8.
[6] The Court has set out this history in detail, Carlos Morales Feliciano v. Rossello Gonzalez, 13 F.Supp.2d 151, 156-159 (D.P.R.1998).
[7] The only competence, in correctional health under the laws of the Commonwealth assigned to the Secretary of Health is stated at 4 LPRA § 1112(1) which refers to procedures under the Security Measures of Puerto Rico's Penal Code, arts. 66 et seq. 33 LPRA §§ 3351 et seq. which are not in use. The only explanation for the Secretary of Health to be involved in this matter at all is that the parties agreed to bring the Secretary of Health and the Secretary of Anti-Addiction Services together with the Administrator of Corrections in one section of the

Correctional Health Plan (Amended Sixty-Second Report of the Court Monitor) (Docket # 1959) and order adopting the stipulated plan (Docket # 2465). The plaintiff class has moved to terminate that section of the medical plan and the defendants have joined them.
[8] There must be no doubt that this court's order of May 15, 1998 approved the joint proposal for the creation of a not-for-profit corporation as part of the remedy to the violations of plaintiffs' constitutional rights to health care. The order ended by requiring counsel for the parties to report on progress, Morales Feliciano, 13 F.Supp.2d at 214, which led to any number of meetings and to substantial financial support for the development of the corporation, all of which is spread on the record.
[9] The defendant also issued and served trial subpoenas requiring the production, from the Corporation and its board members, a broad spectrum of documents for five or six years.
[10] Any violation of commonwealth law however unspecific would be a matter for Commonwealth courts and other agencies, not for this Court. And the utter absence of specificity in Defendant's proffer denudes the proffer of any credibility.
[11] Frew arises under a Medicaid program, Early and Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment. (ESPDT), Title 42 U.S.C. §§ 1396a(a) 43, 1396d(r).
[12] The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico has unequivocally stated that the Commonwealth's public policy is established by the Constitution of Puerto Rico, the statutes enacted thereunder and their judicial interpretation. Hernandez Torres v. Hernandez Colon, 129 D.P.R. 824, 878 (1992), citing Ocasio v. Alcalde, 121 DPR 37 (1988); Ortiz Andujar v. ELA; 122 DPR 817 (1988); Hurd v. Hodge, 334 U.S. 24, 68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed. 1187 (1948). The last volume of the Supreme Court's decisions to be published in English is volume 100.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 672 F.Supp. 591 (1986)

Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Carlos ROMERO BARCELO, et al., Defendants.

Civ. A. No. 79-4 (PG).

United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.

March 21, 1986.

592 *592 Harvey B. Nachman, Santurce, P.R., for plaintiffs.

Marcos Ramírez-Lavandero, Hato Rey, P.R., for defendants.

PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.

"Prison inmates are voteless, politically unpopular, and socially threatening.... Under these circumstances, the courts have emerged as a critical force behind efforts to ameliorate inhumane conditions....

There is no reason of comity, judicial restraint, or recognition of expertise for courts to defer to

593

negligent omission of officials who lack the resources or motivation *593 to operate prisons within

limits of decency...."

Mr. Justice William J. Brennan, Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981).

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The incarceration as punishment for those convicted of crime, and at times, the detention of those who await trial, are integral components of the administration of criminal law. As any judge must, the Court has accepted and exercised the awesome authority to punish the commission of crime by the deprivation of liberty. Those who are accused of the commission of a crime must at times be detained to assure their presence at trial even if the law holds them to be innocent until their guilt is proven beyond a reasonable doubt. The time is long past, however, when the punishment of crime was the occasion for spectacles of imaginative cruelty or secret torture.
We must punish crime and serious crime must be punished severely. But we must not diminish our humanity by inflicting wanton pain and degrading suffering on those convicted of crime, and we must not punish at all those who wait for the processes of the law to have their innocence or guilt adjudged. The Eighth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments compel our obedience to these salutary principles of political morality which our society has accepted as necessary premises of substantive and procedural criminal law.
The plaintiffs in this class action[1] are all in the custody of the Administration of Correction of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (the Administration). Most have been convicted of crime, a substantial minority are pretrial detainees, some have been imprisoned for civil contempt. This is not the first time that the Court is called upon to adjudicate the rights of the plaintiff class,[2] nor does the Court expect that it will be the last: the enforcement of federal injunctive relief for the protection of the constitutional rights of prison inmates is notoriously difficult. Today we commit the authority of this Court to the enforcement of the federal rights of these plaintiffs. The Court is fully 594 aware of the deference which is owed to the sound discretion and expertise *594 of prison administrators and to the right of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to define and punish crime. The Court is also aware, however, of its duty to protect federal rights and enforce the Constitution of the United States within this jurisdiction, even behind the prison walls.

The Court's experience in the implementation of the preliminary injunction entered in this action five years ago has been an education in the peculiar needs and the problems confronted by the Commonwealth and the Administration of Correction in the field of penology. The Court has given careful consideration and given great weight in deciding this case to those needs and to the difficulties which even well intentioned administrators acting in good faith meet within the performance of their duties. The Court must regretably find, however, that the defendants have all too frequently offered the appearance of compliance with its decree as a substitute for obedience, the laws of the Commonwealth have been ignored by administrators (at all levels) who disobey in silence, and vast sums of money, whose expenditure has been repeatedly proffered to the Court as evidence of reformation, have been wasted without bringing about any substantial and enduring change in the reality of daily life in Puerto Rico's prisons. What little has been done, the Court finds, is only the result of the Court's prior intervention, and the fragile and limited improvements in the provision of medical services have been made in spite of the Administration and not because of any institutional determination calculated to turn around an agency which systematically inflicts cruel and unusual punishment on the persons whom the law has committed to its custody.
Nothing in this record even hints at the inability of the Commonwealth to comply with the commands of the Constitution. What is clear to anyone who cares to give even cursory attention to the evidence before the Court is that the intolerable cruelty of the conditions forced on the plaintiff class is caused by the intentional acts and omissions, or the deliberate disregard of the natural consequences of the acts and omissions, of the defendants and their agents and employees. This has been true for decades: the problems which the Administration faces have been a long time in the making. But every person now before the Court has acted or omitted to act to perpetuate the systematic violation of plaintiff's federal rights. The Constitution and laws of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, if obeyed, would have been sufficient protection against the evils prevalent in the institutions operated by the Administration. In the exercise of our equitable jurisdiction we do not, as we must not, rely on Commonwealth law to shape injunctive relief. But we take the law of the Commonwealth as evidence of the longstanding policy to maintain humane conditions in penal institutions, evidence to which we must give greater credence than to the protestations made by defendants' counsel unsupported as they are by any meaningful evidence.
This action was commenced by a complaint filed on February 7, 1979, and certified as a class action on April 2, 1979. After extensive discovery, bitterly contested by the defendants, a motion for emergency and extraordinary relief resulted in a preliminary injunction. The parties stipulated that the Court determine the equitable claims without precluding the rights of the parties to a trial by jury on the claims for damages, and the Court approved 595 that stipulation.[3] The record now *595 before the Court was completed in hearings which extended over months and it is a thorough and accurate evidentiary basis on which to predicate an understanding of the conditions in the penal institutions run by the Administration and the structures and modus operandi of the Administration. The transcript of the testimony given by dozens of witnesses (inmates, experts, Administration officers and employees, health professionals) runs into thousands of pages. The documentary evidence, no less extensive, includes films and still pictures, Administration and prison records, inmate files and medical charts, reports prepared for or by the Administration. The Court has conducted an ocular inspection of most of the closed institutions operated by the Administration. Counsel have thoroughly and repeatedly briefed the issues before the Court. This has not been an easy process. The defendants have fought the plaintiffs' every step of the way frequently beyond the limits of responsible litigation. The Court encourages, indeed requires, forceful advocacy in the representation of any client, but the defendants and their attorneys have insisted on an adversary of extreme vexatiousness which has sorely tested the patience of the Court and wasted judicial resources. It is not proper in a civil action to litigate protractedly factual matters which a party knows to be true beyond any reasonable doubt. This the defendants have done throughout the course of these proceedings.
The Administration is an integral system which operates all institutions within the Commonwealth where pretrial detainees are held pending trial and convicts are housed to extinguish their sentences. Its operations are highly centralized at its main offices in San Juan. The institutions are of three kinds: closed institutions, agricultural camps, and halfway houses. The closed institutions are at San Juan, Río Piedras, Bayamón, Arecibo, Aguadilla, Ponce, Guayama, and Humacao. The institutions known as The Industrial School for Women at Vega Alta and the Miramar Annex (which houses most but not all of the minors in the custody of the Administration) are also

closed institutions. The State Penitentiary at Río Piedras includes a maximum security unit known by various names, but usually refered to by a euphemism as the U.T.I. or Intensive Treatment Unit. Bayamón and Guayama are recently built structures in a state of accelerated dilapidation which results from overcrowding and inadequate maintenance. Ponce and Aguadilla are nineteenth century structures. The rest are of intermediate age. All, particularly Arecibo, Aguadilla, Ponce and the Miramar Annex, which are both dangerous and unfit for human occupation, are badly dilapidated. During the pendency of this action millions were spent on the modernization of the State Penitentiary: a riot caused extensive damages which had not yet been repaired months later at the time of our ocular inspection. The status of the institution at Sabana Hoyos has changed during the course of this action from a camp to a closed institution.
The agricultural camps are underused and except intermittently and for short periods do not present the conditions of overcrowding which prevail in the closed institutions. These institutions are located at Sabana Hoyos, Mayaguez, Jayuya, Cayey, Río Grande and Naguabo. The halfway houses at Río Piedras, Arecibo and Carolina were only incidentally mentioned in litigation and their marginal function in the system makes them nonsignificant to our findings and conclusions.
Every penal institution has its own superintendent, who is responsible for the day-to-day management of the institution. A division within the Administration hierarchy, known as the Program for Penal Institutions, supervises and oversees the operation of all the penal institutions at the central office level. The director of the program is directly responsible to the Administrator and sub-Administrator of Correction.
Every year the Administration submits a budget request necessary to cover its operations and projected expenditures for the coming fiscal year. This budget request is made to form a part of the general expenditures 596 budget for the Government of Puerto *596 Rico that is submitted to the Legislature of Puerto Rico by the Governor. In the preparation of the Administration's budget, each of the penal institutions submits a budget for its operations. That includes food, medicines, supplies, equipment and personnel.
The central offices asume the distribution of medicines, the transfer of inmates, the allocation and transfer of guards, social workers and medical services personnel, and supervisory responsibility of each institution's capability to deliver services to provide for the needs of the inmates such as health services, educational and vocational services, security to life and property, food and beding and general hygiene services.
The total penal population in Puerto Rico hovered around the 3,800 mark for the year 1981. This number has continued to increase during the pendency of this action. The inmate population is divided initially in two broad categories: pretrial detainees and sentenced inmates. Except for pretrial detainees, who are not classified in any way, inmates in the penal institutions in Puerto Rico are classified into three custodial categories: minimum, medium and maximum. Pretrial detainees are normally kept in the closed institutions. There they account from anywhere between 20% to 50% of the total penal population of the institution at any given time. In most institutions, pretrial detainees are indiscriminately mixed with sentenced inmates. Only minimum custody classification inmates can be placed at the penal camps. Additionally, only minimum custody classification inmates are allowed to work with the Correctional Enterprises Corporation.
The number of inmates that are confined in any given institution is theoretically determined by capacity ratings which have been assigned to each institution by the central office. Daily reports on the penal population of each institution are sent to the central office. The Court has been unable to find any rational criteria for the capacity ratings originally assigned by the Administration to the several institutions.[4]
597 *597 Overcrowding
Overcrowding is at the center of the many ills which make the conditions of imprisonment in the Commonwealth's penal institutions constitutionally unacceptable. Neither statistics nor anecdote will suffice to express the intensity of confinement, physical and psychological, to which the plaintiff class is condemned. Medical and social services cannot be rationally planned or systematically delivered in institutions filled beyond capacity to such an extent that at times inmates will cover the entire floor space in their living quarters when they lie down to sleep on the floors 0907 with or without mattresses 0907 and in double bunks ranged so closely together that they must be entered

from the front rather than the side. Recreation, exercise and education, even where the facilities exist to provide them, are available only to a small fraction of the population. But all of these services and necessities are luxuries to these plaintiffs whose property and lives cannot be protected by the Administration.
The overcrowding evidenced by the testimony of the superintendents, the films and photographs are hard to believe even when experienced. As the Court visited each institution the sense of physical closeness and the revulsion at so much compressed humanity grew to an awareness of the psychological stress which must affect any human being almost totally deprived of any privacy or intimacy. Towels and sheets have turned bunks into cubicles of isolation in spite of the Administration's prohibition of these make-shift partitions which increase security problems by reducing custodial visibility within the dormitories. Some few inmates, by the use of unapparent authority and power, have appropriated disproportionate amounts of space; in the newer institutions spaces meant to be linen and utilities closets have become the privileged domain of one or two inmates. Otherwise, the inmate population lives in oppressive physical propinquity in communal housing units in the tropical heat, with inadequate ventilation and not infrequently unprotected against the rain.
Unprotected, convicts and pretrial detainees are housed together, most of them in total idleness, without regard to even the availability of sanitary facilities. At the remodelled State Penitentiary the Court saw a group of over sixty men housed in two large rooms whose only furniture was the thin plastic mattresses on which they slept: all sixty had access to two toilets, one of which was out of order, and both of them were beyond two locked gates manually operated by a guard who, as part of his duties, allowed one inmate at a time access to the single sanitary facility. Other institutions operate on the same standard of callous indifference to even the basic physical 598 needs of inmates. The rated capacities assigned to each institution by *598 the Administration are more a declaration of intent than anything else and there is no rational basis for the capacity assigned except in Bayamón and Guayama, which were recently constructed and designed to house a specific number of prisoners.
Bayamón was designed for a population of 450-500 inmates, the population has at times reached over 1,400; Guayama, which should have no more than 220 has been doubled. We quote from the evaluation of the Administration prepared by Moyer Associates Incorporated, at the Administration's request, titled Plan for Corrections: Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, filed on September 12, 1984, (Moyer Report), the descriptive summary of housing conditions at Bayamón:
Unacceptable. There are two types of housing at this site, maximum security single cells provide housing for approximately 184 inmates. The remainder of the housing is for all minimum security custody. Both housing types require complete building rennovations, hardware maintenance or replacement and new equipment. Also inmate counts should be determined for each housing unit and not exceeded.
The comment on this institution is in part to the effect that:
While this is a very new and reasonably good institution for 450-500 inmates as it was originally designed, the over population to inmate levels of 1,400 inmates have resulted in an almost total vandalism of the entire physical plant. The entire facility requires a major renovation and all new equipment.
The housing at Guayama was also rated unacceptable and although the population levels have not been there as dramatically over capacity as at Bayamón, overcrowding is still the assignable issue for the deficiencies in housing, caused by vandalism to be sure, but also by the poor maintenance given all facilities and the Administration's abdication of its duty to maintain order within all institutions.
The National Institute of Corrections (NIC) Report also describes the institution at Bayamón. As far as it is a description of the conditions of life and the environment in which the inmates live it is in agreement with the evidence before the Court. We quote in extenso with the coreat, here as elsewhere, that the recommendations made by the Report have been weighed by the Court in reaching the decision which we set out below, but that we have also taken care to limit the remedy which we grant to the plaintiffs to what is constitutionally required and not what is expertly desired. At pages 27-29 the Report reads:

a. Metropolitan Regional Institution/Bayamón. The original design of this facility, which began in 1968, and for which construction was completed in 1976, compares very favorably with the features called for by current standards for correctional facilities. The design designated a range of program and administrative spaces that would accommodate educational, counseling, recreational and other client activities. Today extreme overcrowding has caused these spaces, and others, to be redesignated as sleeping areas for additional inmates.

An additional result of the overcrowding has been the rapid deterioration of the relatively new physical plant. In part this appears to have been caused by the overloading of building systems which were designed for a much smaller number of inmates. In greater part it seems due to other impacts stemming from overcrowding, most particularly the institutional atmosphere that has developed. The prevailing situation is one in which inmates are in much greater control than staff over events that occur. Increased tensions and hostilities tend to become expressed through attacks upon the institution itself. Deliberate abuse and vandalism of the buildings is prevalent, some intended to achieve personal environments and individual expression in a place where there is no recognition of the individual.

The same results could occur, and sometimes do occur, without overcrowding 0907 e.g., where minor

599

repairs are neglected *599 and thereby lead to major structural or functional problems. An

unsatisfactory institutional climate, however, is exacerbated by overcrowding, though it will not be

remedied by a reduction in the number of inmates alone nor explained by suggestion that the

architect has produced a faulty design.

The condition which exists at Bayamón, in addition to its outward display of deterioration, is an extremely unsafe one for staff and inmates alike. Recommendations are separately offered concerning classification, programming and administrative measures relative to this condition. With respect to the physical environment, the following is offered.

Population should be reduced to allow originally designated classrooms, corridors, and other spaces to be returned to their intended use.

Dependent upon the classification of inmates who might be assigned to Bayamón, several alternatives are suggested that would allow compliance with the recognized standards in the field. In terms of the specific requirements of the preliminary Opinion and Order issued by the United States District Court, the requirements are quite clear. Population must be reduced to achieve 35 square feet of living and sleeping space within the specified time requirement, and later, 55 square feet. In the case of Bayamón it is found that a total capacity of 568 inmates is possible under the first condition. A systemwide plan which achieves 55 square feet per inmate in dormitories and single occupancy of cells (which at Bayamón are approximately 60 square feet in size) allows a total capacity of 416 inmates.

Under the latter condition of occupancy, considering dormitories as minimum security space, Bayamón would offer 304 minimum security beds and 112 medium or maximum security individual cells. These cells are unaccompanied by dayroom space required by recognized standards. Consequently the total capacity of 416 inmates at 55 square feet per inmate is qualified.

The further consideration of necessary amounts of day space to accompany the dormitory sleeping areas, in accordance with standards, produces a capacity finding of 268 inmates in these areas. Coupled with the 112 individual cells, the total capacity is 380 inmates on this basis.

(emphasis added)

The Ponce institution was built between 1830 and 1849 and is functionally obsolete as well as in a serious state of structural deterioration. Constructed as a barracks made of timber, frame and brick (the administrative area is a warren of cardboard and plastic partitions) structural cracking is evident at several locations on the outside wall.

The dormitories are obviously unsafe for inmates and staff 0907 a condition from which the guards and their supervisors try to protect themselves by never entering the dormitories alone and carrying out routine supervisory duties from outside the dormitories.

About the Arecibo institution the NIC has this to say at page 32:

Constructed in 1905, it possesses the degree of functional obsolescence that can be expected of a facility of this vintage. All building sub-systems are substandard, including the structure itself. Roof and floor structure consists of timber beams on masonry bearing walls with wood purlins supporting a brick and concrete deck (see Figures 47, 48 and 54). In some areas the bricks have fallen out. In other areas, an insect infestation is eating away the wood support members and tracking their wastes all over the walls. [Figure 48 documents this condition in the commissary.] Facilities in less serious condition have been condemned for public use.

And about the District Jail at Humacao:

It is a fire trap; it is unsanitary, overcrowded, and generally unfit for human occupancy. Paint is

falling off the ceiling into the food preparation area. Food spillage is everywhere. Tiles are missing

from the walls. Vermin infest the inmate lockers and living areas. Water damage is evident

600

throughout. Electrical *600 wiring is outdated and unsafe. Locking devices present a life safety

hazard. Clothing hangs everywhere. Mattresses are torn and dirty. Because there are more

inmates than beds, many sleep on mattresses placed on the floor. Rats also occupy the floor.

The capacity ratings presented in this report address area allowances only. The continued use of the Humacao District Jail, even at these levels should be considered only on a temporary basis. Facilities in less serious condition and posing less danger to their occupants have been ordered closed in other jurisdictions. Humacao, like Ponce, Arecibo and Aguadilla, should be considered no differently.

The jail at Aguadilla is exceptionally sound in structure, which advantage is offset by there being no grounds: an 848 square foot courtyard surrounded by the three story building and a blank wall is the only space for recreation. The courtyard is used for dispensing meals to inmates and for cleaning cooking utensils after use: all other uses are therefore limited to the late afternoon hours. Visits are conducted in the dining room, as they are conducted at Arecibo in the entrance hall. Kitchen equipment, electrical systems, plumbing and locks are substandard and patently dilapidated. This institution is particularly dark, damp and ill-ventilated.

The Miramar Annex, used to house young adults (almost exclusively since adult inmates who work there are also housed in the institution) is particularly shocking. Built as a hospital, the structure is totally inadequate to a penal purpose. It is deteriorated beyond redemption: the kitchen is unsanitary, open drains and open sewers, malfunctioning and insufficient toilets and drains, insufficient ventilation, bad illumination, inadequate recreational and educational facilities, heat and intolerable levels of noise characterize this hellhole where youth is expected to rehabilitate itself or wait for the judgment of society.

What is remarkable about the conditions which we have set out here is that they are evident: the films and pictures in evidence, a visit to the institutions, a layman's knowledge are enough to establish what we have described. The defendants knew that such was the reality which they so strenuously fought to keep from the record; they just plainly could not have not known. They have received the expert and documented advice of highly qualified professionals. Nothing has been done except at the command of the Court and that grudgingly and incompletely.

Let us for the sake of illustration tabulate the numerical capacities of these institutions at different intensities of occupation and compare them to the by now exceeded, recent levels of overcrowding.

To deal with this level of overcrowding policy decisions must be made and line personnel must be trained to carry them out and all employee and staff persons must be aware of the complexity of the issues, the magnitude of the effort to be made and the

Capacity at 35 square feet per inmate

Total

Actual

Beyond

Actual

Beyond

Capacity

Occupancy

Capacity

Occupancy Capacity

12/31/80

7/21/83

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bayamón

568

1242

674

916

348

Guayama

220

410

190

2449

229

State Pen

507

310

(197)

943

436

Aguadilla

80

188

108

112

32

Stop 8

66

56

(10)

74

12

Humacao

73

177

104

179

106

Vega Alta

94

74

(20)

141

47

Arecibo

109

215

106

125

16

Miramar

183

250

67

358

175

Ponce

236

325

89

499

263

601 *601

Under Professionally Recognized Standards

Total

Actual

Beyond

Actual

Beyond

Capacity Occupancy Capacity

Occupancy

Capacity

12/31/80

7/21/83

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Bayamón

380

1242

902

916

536

Guayama

116

410

294

449

333

State Pen

500

310

(190)

943

443

Aguadilla

36

188

152

112

116

Stop 8

25

56

31

74

49

Humacao

41

177

136

139

98

Vega Alta

62

74

12

141

79

Arecibo

52

215

163

125

73

Miramar

55

250

195

358

303

Ponce

99

325

226

499

400

need to abide by decisions and perform duties. Overcrowding will not be solved immediately and it affects every area of inmate life. But overcrowding must be dealt with and other problems resolved if the prisons of Puerto Rico are ever to pass constitutional muster. We again quote from the National Instutite of Corrections Report, at pages 26-27, to show the interrelation of the several areas and the magnitude of the problems to be addressed by the Court, the parties and, ultimately, the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

The recently constructed facilities at Bayamón and Guayama have deteriorated quite rapidly with overcrowding as one of the principal reasons. The older district jail facilities, including Humacao, Ponce, Arecibo and Aguadilla, are severely deteriorated for different reasons, although they are also extremely overcrowded. These older facilities are obsolete in their original design. They are uniformly characterized by violations of recognized health standards, life safety codes and building codes. They are substandard structures which, at the same time, fail to provide appropriate space in either quantity or quality for detention or corrections use.

As a matter of introduction to the material that follows, the question of requirements for pretrial as opposed to sentenced inmates needs to be addressed. As it affects facility conditions, such a distinction generally only involves the provision of intake processing spaces for pretrial use 0907 which are not required in sentenced facilities 0907 and the provision of additional program spaces in

sentenced facilities beyond basic recreation, counseling or interviewing spaces which any facility should have. Recognized standards, as well as the results of cases filed under the equal protection provisions of the 14th Amendment to the United States Constitution, establish that inmates who are not yet adjudicated should be provided no lesser level of safety or adequacy in housing condition than those who have been tried and found guilty. As a result, necessary housing, programming and support requirements are not significantly different for pretrial and sentenced individuals. Further, the type of housing, whether individual cell or dormitory, will be tied to classification in either instance.

The foregoing statement has particularly significance for the Puerto Rican corrections system. The

shortcomings of the various existing facilities will not be remedied by redesignating them as

pretrial facilities. It is observed that existing facilities primarily offer open dormitory sleeping and

living space. Despite a certain amount of cell space in the system (728), none is accompanied by

necessary day space. The dormitories are generally appropriate for inmates classified as

minimum security only. Consequently, the representation of system capacity which follows is

602

qualified and should be correlated to the results of a classification analysis of the total system

*602 population. Also, it should be correlated to the results that would be obtained by diverting

socio-medical and psychiatric cases from the corrections system to more appropriate resources.

Adequacy of existing facilities will not be obtained by a reduction in population alone. Were this possible, the charts presented in this section of the report indicate the need for a very significant reduction in population, the development of additional bedspace, or a combination of these. Compliance with the preliminary Opinion and Order of the United States District Court, dated September 5, 1980, at the levels of 35 square feet and 55 square feet of sleeping and living space per inmate points directly to such a need. While every facility has not been analyzed under this technical assistance, the major facilities and some camps have been. By extending the findings in most institutions to those remaining, it is possible to approximate the implications of compliance with the court order. This is done by comparing the existing total incarcerated population to that which is possible under the stipulated floor area allowances. Setting aside the issue of type of population, whether minimum, medium, or maximum security, it is found that the total existing institutional capacity is approximately 3187 inmates at 35 square feet, and 2332 inmates at 55 square feet. Compared to an existing population of approximately 3948 inmates, current utilization of facilities is excessive in the amount of 761 and 1616 inmates respectively.

It should be noted that we are cognizant of the U.S. District Court's mandate requiring, at a time in the future, 70 square feet per individually-celled inmate. Currently, the corrections system does not have cells that meet this requirement, although almost all are within ten to fifteen square feet of the required size. Professional standards suggest 60 square feet as adequate where time-incell is limited. In order to accommodate such standards, considerable day space would have to be created and increased emphasis placed on productive activity and programming. Without such arrangement, it would be necessary to construct new cells. In this regard, compliance with the court order requires a similar analysis of options. However, for purposes of the assessment of capacity as described in the remainder of this section, we have assumed continued use of those cells currently available. The Administration should keep this caveat in mind when preparing its report to the District Court.

Considering the matter of type of bedspace and the recognition of established standards in the field, it is found that the system has a total of 1069 minimum security beds and 721 medium and maximum security beds. Under this analysis, which is qualified to include certain improvements in existing facilities, the system has a total bedspace capacity of 1790. Particular reference is made to the Federal Standards for Prisons and Jails adopted by the U.S. Department of Justice and the Manual of Standards for Adult Correctional Institutions issued by the Commission on Accreditation for Corrections of the American Correctional Association. While compliance with these standards has not been mandated under the preliminary Opinion and Order, it has been considered as potentially useful to assess the capacity of the institutions in the system under these standards as

a reference point when considering interim or short-term actions. Beyond this approximated

assessment of capacity, it is recommended that a more detailed follow-up analysis be undertaken.

The study should be a part of a planning focus for the total system in which facility requirements

are determined by decision-making in the larger context. The amount of bedspace and kind of

bedspace are inextricably tied to a range of system options that may be considered and acted

upon. Each of these needs to be analyzed both for the immediate impact and that which may be

projected. Such option 0907 affecting routing of clients in or out of the system, classification and

603

programming for individuals incarcerated, and lengths of client stay 0907 should be *603 compared

against a profiling of the inmate population to determine the extent of their potential impact, and

referenced to the values of the public in Puerto Rico to discern the extent of their acceptability.

The overcrowding which pervades the system cannot be corrected by a uniform assignment of square feet per inmate. Nor can we rely on the standards proferred by expert opinions and professional associations. The life in these institutions is in such a state of disarray and the incapacity of the Administration to manage the system is so evident, that we can only take square footage and recommended standards as our point of departure. As improvement is shown in other areas of penal life we will have to reconsider and modify our decision of today. Let us now examine those other areas.

Security

An inmate's protection against inmate violence may often depend on how fast he can run to a locked gate to call a guard. Violence takes the form of sexual assaults, mayhem or homicide, all of which occur with intolerable frequency throughout the system. Firearms and explosives have been used during riots which have produced several fatalities. Suicides are frequent. Assaults by guards on inmates are frequently reported. Guards frequently look the other way or incite other guards or inmates when violence occurs. There is a widespread insecurity and universal fear throughout the system.
Gangs form and reform themselves around shifting loyalties. The Administration has admitted what was patently evident during our visit that institutions have in recent years been dedicated to one of two island-wide gangs who are the effective government of prison life, and no person who belongs to whichever is the other group is safe within an institution held by either gang. At Bayamón the guards were observed to be outside the individual buildings which house the communal dorms: the fact of gang control is accepted everywhere and by all.
The ratio of guards to inmates is, on paper, well within the 1:5 proportion prevalent throughout the nation. Absenteeism and sick leave modify substantially that sufficiency of guards, pay and morale are low, training is deficient. And the effective use of guards is further diminished by the need to assign them to non-custodial tasks. Almost every superintendent who testified or was heard during the inspection of the closed institutions asserted that he needed more guards to assure inmates of their personal security: requests that were routinely ignored by the central office. A staffing pattern recommended by the National Institute of Corrections, at the Administration's request, could not be met. Guards are routinely not deployed within overcrowded dormitories: as we have noted they are at times not even deployed within buildings at the posts expressly designed for this function.
Locks are of unacceptable standard throughout the institutions and security equipment is equally deficient: padlocks, with individual keys, and chains have been substituted for standard locking systems. This condition presents life safety problems as does the absence of devices to detect and suppress fires.
What has been said here is only a brief and concentrated extract of the evidence spread on the record and we will not make the crisis worse by detailing here the risks inherent to the system, but the record will uphold the Court's conclusion that the Administration does not afford inmates or staff protection against violence and that the plaintiff class lives in fear. The moral degradation of a law enforcement agency which yields its authority over persons in its custody to gangs of convicts can only work to the deterioration of inmates and force them to accept extra-legal structures of life and government.

Protective Custody
Considering the Administration's failure to protect plaintiffs from violence, it is not surprising that large numbers of 604 inmates request to be placed in protective custody. To do so they must execute a waiver since *604 protective
custody is frequently only available in isolation cells 0907 before the preliminary injunction in the infamous "calabozos". Once isolated in a hospital ward, maximum security cell or other isolated space the inmate is given no further particularized attention. Pre-trial detainees must often place themselves in protective custody because unfamiliarity with prison life makes them vulnerable, because the prison in the locality of arrest is in control of an enemy gang, or because the young must be protected against sexual assault.
Although it is not the Administration's policy to change the classification of an inmate placed in protective custody, it does occur. The practical effect of living in protective custody, however, is that the inmate forfeits his participation in work, study and recreational programs and the time-credits which go with work and study. (See Tr. 1466-68). One Administrator, Irba Cruz de Batista, was under the unaccountable impression that special tutoring was provided for persons in protective custody. The Court must reiterate that the low credibility which it assigns to Administration witnesses is at least in some part due to the bizarre beliefs and impressions to which they testified.
Considered with the deplorable conditions in the institutions and the fact that protective custody means mostly a 24-hour lock-up (with perhaps a walk down the hall for a shower once a day), the extended time for which an inmate must stay in protective custody (often months on end) and the absence of medical supervision of any kind, the Court finds that protective custody wantonly inflicts on inmates considerable pain and deprives them of opportunities to shorten their time of incarceration. The waivers, executed in fear of sexual assault, violence or death, are nullities.
Disciplinary Proceedings
Regulations on disciplinary proceedings were promulgated by the Commonwealth as a result of prior litigation in this Court: Milton Sandoval, et al v. Francisco de Jesús Schuck, et al, Civil No. 939-75. On paper, the regulations pass muster. But the operation of the disciplinary process causes delay and is frequently used arbitrarily and capriciously by custodial and administrative personnel.
Once the inmate is charged with a violation of prison regulations he is placed in the same living conditions as those discussed above for inmates in protective custody 0907 with the same results. An inmate who wins his case after waiting for a hearing and a decision after a hearing will have been punished without any cause.
Classification
There is neither a rational nor adequate classification system in the Administration of Correction. Pretrial detainees are regularly housed with convicted prisoners. First offenders are not separated from recidivists. Dangerous and aggressive inmates are housed with passive individuals. Misdemeanants are not separated from felons. There are three custodial classifications for convicted prisoners: maximum, medium and minimum. Classification of a prisoner after conviction is made by a Classification and Treatment Committee in the closed institution to which he is assigned. Before being seen by the Classification and Treatment Committee, the convicted prisoner must be interviewed and recommended by the socio-penal worker.
The Classification and Treatment Committee is, within each institution, the operational administrative unit in charge of classification. Classification and Treatment Committees are composed of the superintendent of the institution, a custodial officer and the socio-penal worker. Automatically, upon entry, the convict is classified in the medium custody unless same reason appears for a maximum classification. There is no entry point or entry points where inmates are sent after conviction for a full physical and psychological evaluation, coupled with a detailed analysis of their criminal record and past custodial behavior. The Classification and Treatment

Committee does not have the authority to transfer the convict to any other institution. Pretrial detainees are not 605 classified: indeed, they rarely, if ever, receive any *605 social services and are mostly left to their individual or
family resources to establish communications with the outside world to secure the assistance of counsel, arrange bail and prepare for trial.
Inmates may remain unclassified for long periods of time. At all times prior to the consolidated hearing in this case the number of socio-penal workers in the several institutions had never reached more than 75% of the positions allocated, and for some periods of time there were only about 60% of the positions filled. Months could go by, as happened for example at Arecibo, with no socio-penal worker at all. Nearly every socio-penal worker has a case load that is unmanageable.
This underutilization of allocated resources continued through the hearings on various contempt motions and was apparent during the inspection by the Court. It must be remembered that referrals to the CTC are one of the many duties of these underpaid and sometimes unqualified employees.
All the evidence shows that the Classification and Treatment Committees invariably decide by unanimous vote and there are hardly ever any discussions or dissents spread upon the minutes. Upon classification, the inmate is given an institutional plan. The institutional plan generally has nothing to do with the inmate's custodial classification, his propensities and talents, or his former work experience, if any. Institutional plans are determined by the size of the population in the particular institution, the services available there, the jobs open and the number of penal guards available.
Once classified as a medium custody prisoner, there are no regular periods for reevaluation of that classification. Except for a proposition in the Manual of Classification that convicts should be observed for eight months before classification from medium to minimum custody, re-classification is not geared to the length of sentence, the type of crime committed, or other rational criteria. When re-classification is made, the result is noted but reasons are seldom, if ever, placed on the record.
As a result of the chaotic classification procedure, inmates who would benefit from anti-addiction treatment may be confined in institutions where such services are unavailable. Inmates who could be learning academic courses are confined in institutions where they are not offered. Nothing is done to assure the continuity of treatment or education when a transfer from one institution to another takes place.
The record is replete with instances of the institutional mixing of young adult offenders with mature persons; of first offenders with recidivists; of minimum custody prisoners with medium and maximum custody prisoners; of misdemeanants with felons; of addicts with non-addicts; of passive and aggressive individuals; of relatively normal persons with persons suffering from mental illnesses; of the sick and contagiously ill with the healthy. This failure of classification operates to prevent rehabilitation. It also militates against the personal security of the inmates and of the institutions themselves. The classification procedures or their malfunction adversely affect the convicts' liberty rights. Extra time credit for work or study do not depend upon an inmate's custodial classification as much as upon the fortuitous placement in one or another of the ten closed institutions. This may result in the anomalous situation where maximum custody prisoners are able to lower their sentences by working while minimum custody prisoners cannot. In essence, classification depends in great measure upon such determinants as proximity to the sentencing court and availability of beds, which are not the considerations on which the classification manual is elaborated. The implementation of the institutional life-plan will further depend on the availability of guards and the institution's safety levels since an inmate will often have to lock himself up in protective custody beyond the reach of work, study or therapy.
The Court concludes that proper classification is essential to the operation of orderly and safe institutions. 606 Without proper classification of inmates, equal opportunity to prison work, to credits for lowering time *606
served, for therapy for addiction, and for educational opportunities, do not exist. The haphazard operations of classification and institutional life-plan of inmates further contributes to the confusion and frustration of their lives and to the deterioration of said lives and opportunities for rehabilitation.
Arbitrariness becomes the norm in granting or withholding services and programs which are the required means to earn time-credits or obtain parole. We do not here consider the effect of this chaos on any individual inmate.

The Court does find, however, that systematic administrative malpractice and negligence engendered by a routine failure to comply with Commonwealth law and regulations produce the random denial of statutory rights and the reasonable and well-founded expectations of members of the plaintiff class without the due process of law secured to them by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution.
Rehabilitation and Parole
A. Rehabilitation:
All the sociopenal workers, their supervisors and the superintendents asserted that rehabilitation of the convicted inmates is the most important goal of their work: rehabilitation is achieved through participation in institutional programs, successful adjustment to prison life and finally reintegration to the free community as a law-abiding citizen. Institutional programs, however, do not exist or are inadequate: when in operation they can be arbitrarily suspended for lack of materials or space, or because teachers or guards are unavailable. Program schedules are conflictive and inmates may have to drop out of one to participate in another. Educational courses are above or below the educational levels of the inmates. Work sources are few and the available work is not meaningful. Recreational facilities are either entirely lacking, underutilized or not used at all because of the unavailability of equipment, guards or other personnel. Inmates are not assessed or diagnosed for work or vocational training but made to fit the available slots: another inmate or a guard is frequently a better source of employment opportunities than the CTC, which is officially responsible for job assignments.
The agricultural camps are not an exception to the general inexistence or disarticulation of institutional programs and deterioration of facilities for recreation and education.
This situation places the mass of the population in custody in degrading idleness, shut up in overcrowded dormitories and cells during most of the day, day in, day out, for years on end. It deprives most inmates of their statutory right to reduce their terms of incarceration by obtaining good-time credits through work or education through the arbitrary capricious operation of individual whims or through the grossly negligent failure of the Administration's officers and employees who fail to comply with their duties under Commonwealth law to provide recreational and educational programs. The Administration's failure to maintain order and secure the personal safety of all persons in its custody is one of the most important factors in the deterioration of facilities, unstructured programs, the break-down of schedules. The resources are available but they are wasted by daily acts of negligence, the abdication of responsibility and the failure to supervise on the part of individual Administration officers and employees at all levels. Thus, we find unused playing fields, classrooms turned into dormitories, teaching funds withheld because of poor enrollment, classes suspended because of unavailable guards, failure to coordinate arrangements with other government agencies or the improper exercise of power by custodial personnel under the carefully averted eyes of their supervisors.
B. Parole:
The sociopenal workers are supposed to help the inmates in preparing their institutional life plans and their reintegration plans with a view to accumulate evidence that will show the Parole Board that their time in prison 607 has been well spent and that *607 they will be able to reintegrate into the free community as law-abiding and working citizens. That the inmates cannot acquire the necessary evidence of educational or work experience in prison we have already seen. But sociopenal workers are further impeded in their duty by work overloads and inadequate resources. Caseloads are normally beyond the limit of all witnesses' estimate of reasonable and manageable number of cases per worker. But even a reduction would not provide the resources needed to prepare a reintegration plan which requires a verifiable offer of employment and approved place for residence. The sociopenal worker has no time or resources to check out the information obtained by the inmate through his family and friends and parole is frequently denied through mistakes that could have been corrected by the sociopenal worker if only the reintegration plan had been properly verified and evaluated.

But of greater adverse significance to the inmate's prospects for parole is the fact that the sociopenal workers do not have adequate information about the standards used by the Parole Board to grant or deny parole. They must rely on their own experience in prior cases which they have handled to guess at what information the Board wants, the weight given to the factors purportedly applied or the corrections needed to prepare a successful application. Even the testimony at trial of the Parole Board members conflicted on the applicable standards and the weight given to the factors considered in making a decision.
The Parole Board is independent from the Administration in discharging its obligation to grant or deny parole but is administratively integrated and the two agencies are interdependent in functional ways. In spite of prior litigation in this Court, there are frequent backlogs and delays because the Administration does not adequately perform its work of preparing cases for the Board which lacks personnel needed to work efficiently. Because it must rely on the Administration, the Board's fact finding is frequently wrong.
This administrative chaos militates actively against the plaintiffs' right to present their cases for parole to the Board and to have an adjudication of their claim according to Commonwealth statutes and regulations. And it contributes significantly to exacerbate the frustration of convicted inmates, to increase the level of tension in the penal population and to inculcate in each person's mind an image of irrationality in the processes of the law. The discrepancies between the realities of prison life and the requirements for parole, promoted as they are by the callous indiference or malfeasance of Administration officers and employees, deprive the plaintiff class of even their ability to exercise rights which implicate liberty interests without the due process of law guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States.[5]
Drug Addiction
More than half of the total population in the Administration's custody have had some involvement with drugs.[6] Treatment against drug addiction is unevenly provided throughout the penal system by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico's Anti-Addiction Services Department (hereinafter DSCA).[7] Additional services are provided by 608 Hogares CREA, Inc., a private non-profit organization *608 which receives substantial funding from the Commonwealth. The pre-trial detainees are normally not provided these services.
Inmates are referred to treatment modules by the sociopenal workers who identify and determine the need for treatment from an inmate's own statements, evidence of prior contacts with drugs, or, in some cases, because treatment against drug addiction is specific in the sentence imposed by the Commonwealth courts. After approval by the Classification and Treatment Committee an inmate is once again evaluated by DSCA personnel. Neither the sociopenal workers nor the DSCA therapists know each other's criteria for identifying and defining drugaddiction or treatment needs. The criteria used by sociopenal workers and therapists at the several institutions are also unclear: misidentifications have occurred. Evaluation does not include physical or psychological testing.
Therapists send descriptive reports of an inmate's therapy history to the sociopenal worker in charge of his case. This information may be included in the report forwarded to the Parole Board and used to grant or deny parole, yet DSCA employees do not know the standards applied by the Parole Board, they do not coordinate their work with Board personnel and they ignore the weight given by the Board to the information which they originate.
No studies have been made to determine the treatment needs of the inmate population and no studies have been made to determine the efficacity of the treatment delivered to inmates.
When an inmate is transferred from one to another institution the DSCA therapists prepare reports for referral to the therapists at the receiving institutions 0907 if there is a treatment module there. Since transfers are recommended and approved by Administration personnel, an inmate is not necessarily moved to an institution where DSCA treatment facilities are available, and inmates have been in fact transferred to institutions which do not provide therapy services and their treatment has been disrupted. DSCA also operates residential programs outside the prisons. Transfers to these residential programs are recommended by the CTC and are approved by an Interagency Committee which is composed of Administration and DSCA personnel under the authority of the Director of the Administration's Penal Institutions Program. The Director, however, does not supervise the

Committee and merely signs the transfers. Although the criteria for admission to the residential programs are initially to be found in statutory law,[8] there is no uniform understanding of what is required to make a successful 609 application for a transfer. Generally, an inmate must *609 be classified in minimum custody and show an interest in rehabilitation evidenced by positive acts in the institution beyond mere compliance with institutional norms. At least one therapist also listed the completion of custodial treatment and community passes (furloughs) as requirements before a recommendation for a transfer to a residential program is made. The DSCA therapists agree that residential treatment is the only stage at which the adequacy and success of treatment can be accurately established since it is then that the addict is once again in contact with the free community and his conduct can be observed.
Treatment for drug addiction is considered by the Parole Board in reaching a decision to grant, deny or postpone parole. Sometimes it denies parole or postpones a decision because treatment records are unavailable. Board decisions which consider drug addiction and treatment as decisional factors are not uniform. Parole has been granted to addicted inmates who have not received or completed treatment. At other times it has required the initiation or continuation of treatment or a transfer when such measures have not been necessary. Parole Board decisions do not always reflect the reality of the treatment received by an inmate or his addictive status. Frequently, the trained personnel responsible for the conduct of therapy have had to take measures with which they do not professionally agree to comply with Board orders.
Treatment status is also important for admission to a half-way house which is a frequent prerequisite to release on parole.

Expert Testimony

Both plaintiffs and defendants relied on expert witnesses to sustain their claims and defenses. Their guidance in making these findings has been of great help to the Court. It is perhaps one of the most outstanding features of this case that no matter which party retained and called the experts they all substantially agreed in their damning evaluation of conditions in the Administration's institutions. This unusual agreement among experts went so far that the defendants unsuccessfully tried to withhold from the Court the testimony of their correctional expert.

The testimony given by the experts was based on their own observations at the institutions which they visited (on occasion more than once) over a span of several months. The facts ascertained by them were abundantly corroborated by other testimonial and documentary evidence.

Dr. Frank Rundle testified as a witness for the plaintiffs as an expert witness primarily on mental illness and psychiatric problems within prisons. His testimony was also pertinent to the issue of general medical care and must be read in conjunction with the evidence given by two other witnesses for plaintiffs, Dr. Lambert King, M.D., and Dr. Antonio T. Diaz Royo, Ph.D. Dr. Rundle also testified as to the effect of prison conditions on incarcerated inmates. Defendants stipulated Dr. Rundle's qualifications as an expert and with good reason; he had extensive experience in both California and New York in the mental health problems of prison life and his academic and professional qualifications were found by the Court to be impeccable. His testimony has been given the greatest weight and credibility by the Court. His testimony best integrates the effect of the totality of conditions throughout the prisons and the deleterious effect of those conditions on the inmates. We find these conclusions, and the conclusions of all the other expert witnesses, as set out here, to be a true and accurate statement of what transpires through the penal system in Puerto Rico.

Not surprisingly, Dr. Rundle underlined the need for order and continuity in the delivery of medical and rehabilitational services to an inmate population.

THE WITNESS: I think it is important in all aspects of the operation for any prison system to be, in fact, a system rather than isolated institution which operates in whatever individual manner the warden or the administrative staff may impose upon it. There has to be a coordination.

So, all of the elements of the system fit together and that should apply in terms of the basic

610

regulations that one inmate *610 is expected to follow in terms of his medical care or psychiatric

care so that there is what in medicine is called a continuity of care. I think that the same concept should apply to programs to work, to recreation, to whatever is available to the inmates at the various institutions.

Q. And what impact, if any, does it have in the mental health of the inmate if that continuity is lacking?

A. I think it would have a negative effect in someone, for example, that is involved in a regular school program and recreation activity and work or whatever at one institution and then he is transferred to another institution where he does not have the same opportunities, he would have been working towards a goal to improve his status when he left the institution and certainly he would be affected. I think that would have a bad affect. (Tr. 2816-2817)

The breakdown of regularity and continuity in services which characterizes the Administration's operations[9] actively militates against any possibility of rehabilitation and inflicts on the inmates psychological harm:

[* * *] There is very little within the institutions which I saw which allow for the possibility of the inmates to further education or training or to increase their employment skills or possibilities and there is a great deal which has a direct negative effect in my opinion. There is a desocialization process which takes place in this kind of setting which makes people less capable of coping once they get out of prison and I think that would predictably happen.

Q. Doctor, you have stated in your report which has been filed in the case, the third paragraph, to

make the following assumption. You stated as follows: "It is also clear that general conditions

611

throughout the system will militate against effective rehabilitation and guarantee *611 that most

inmates will be more socially incapacitated upon release than upon the entrance into the system."

This is the report of Doctor Rundle, the first paragraph first page continues on the second page.

I would like you to elaborate on this assertion and what do you mean by this?

A. I think I have partially explained that on what I just said. It also includes the fact that there is almost no reasonable medical care provided. That means that people are going to be agressive (sic) in terms of developing physical illness, some of which may produce permanent disability and the general lack of opportunity as they said, educational programs, vocational training programs of any kind of activity which would constructively equip someone for life outside the prison and there is a process which goes on within any prison system which has been described by the term infantilization, but which describes a progressive loss of initiative and the kind of submission to a situation in which there is no autonomy, which has no opportunity for independent action or decision.

That condition exists in any prison but I think it is present to an extraordinary degree in what I have seen here. (Tr. 285-286; emphasis supplied).

These conclusions are not generally stated propositions: they are grounded on a multiplicity of factors which affect behaviour and which are intensified by the fact of imprisonment. The lack of security which we have noted is one of these factors:

In a prison setting which is a closed social system and very small from which there is no escape I think the knowledge that violence might fall upon one is going to simply increase the level of anxiety about one's safety and one's life for that matter and I know from experience in working within a prison in which violent deaths were occurring at a very high rate, this was at Soledad, my first prison experience. It led to a situation within the prison which I called, at that time, "institutional paranoia" and others have also used that term in which everybody is afraid of everybody else. Nobody trusts [any]body else and everyone feels that he has to be ready at any moment to defend his life and that leads to another effect in prisons which I think, in a way, only promotes further violence and that is that the inmates would produce some sort of weapon

because they feel they must defend themselves and be prepared to meet this violence and I think that kind of atmosphere in which everybody is afraid, nobody trusts anybody and people are armed to defend themselves just promotes and aggravates that kind of situation. (Tr. 2822)

Present in the institutions is also the deleterious effect of enforced inactivity and the lack of educational and recreational programs and facilities which also contributes to the high level of violence in Puerto Rico's penal institutions:

The Court: [* * *] Am I correct in understanding that recreational facilities are part of the penal environment which would be conducive to assisting the inmates in his rehabilitating process?

The Witness: Yes, I believe that and especially with the younger age group with whom the opportunity at least for vigorous physical exercise I think is very important. Not only in mitigating a lack of nervous tension which results from closed confinement but I think it is also a positive factor in managing an institution, especially again in terms of outside recreation which can be vigorous such as sports. I believe that the incidents of difficulties ... in a prison can be reduced if there is a very active recreation program and also with the sort of recreation activities which can occur indoors. I think one of the most negative aspects of these prisons and many other prisons is the almost total enforced idleness, with really no challenge to one's intellect, without a challenge to one's physical body. It creates an attitude of hopelessness and futility which I believe in the long run have harmful effects. (Tr. 226-227).

The same would also be true about work opportunities, according to Dr. Rundle:

612

*612 A. Work and ones involvement in work and satisfaction with work and, I think is considered

by all people in behavioral sciences as an important part of a man's mental well being and I think

that it is true in prisons as well as anywhere else. And in prisons as elsewhere, I think the

opportunity to do work which is considered meaningful by the person is important. I mean, there

certainly are many people in the general society who work at jobs they don't find very meaningful,

certainly because they must work and support themselves.

But I think generally people strive to find work which they find satisfying. Within the prison there is not very much choice in terms of what work is available and I think very often the jobs are of a sort which most people don't find very rewarding or meaningful, like working in the cell blocks, keeping the place clean, in the kitchen, in the laundry, that sort of thing. I think generally it is just seen as a job that has to be done and it is not meaningful but most inmates would rather work than not work. They would rather work in any kind of job that they could and I think it is very important that a work opportunity be made available to all inmates. (Tr. 2813-2814).

Dr. Rundle also noted the need to maintain efficient and available social services since the inmates must rely on social workers to stay in touch with the outside world and to adequately organize their life in prison. The uncertainties of standards on which parole is granted further contributes to maladaptation and stress in the prisoner's life and to recurrent violations of regulations which extend the inmate's sentence. (Tr. 2830-2832).

All of these problems are exacerbated and magnified by overcrowding. (Tr. 233-234).

Finally, Dr. Rundle established the adverse effects that the need to seek protective custody has on inmates. Not only is the need for self-help pressed on the prisoner since the Administration must resort to locking him up to protect life and limb, the fact of segregation increases the inner conflicts of the inmate who must choose between personal security and the programs which are held out to be the way to rehabilitation and early release.

Dr. Antonio T. Diaz Royo, Ph.D., coincided to a large extent with Dr. Rundle's evaluation of prison conditions but also clarified the malfunctions of several procedures in the penal system. A clinical psychologist, Dr. Diaz Royo stresses the need for an interdisciplinary approach to classification decisions. The scarce psychological resources now at the Administration's disposal are not being properly utilized. Classification at an early stage is necessary to segregate inmates and prepare proper diagnoses which will not only help in the plans for individual rehabilitation but also would tend to predict and prevent situations in which violence can occur. The present

conditions of overcrowding and inadequate classification resulting in commingling of diverse types of offenders negate any positive effects which the classification manual in use can have.
Penal guards, who are not adequately trained, are placed in conditions which push them to develop defense mechanisms by which the guards stereotype inmates as dangerous and incapable of rehabilitation, a defense mechanism which often results in strategies of authoritarianism and arbitrariness in dealing with inmates.
The plaintiffs' correctional expert, Dr. David Fogel, Ph.D., established that the mingling of convicted felons, misdemeanants and pre-trial detainees is against all correctional standards and increases the extraordinary rate of violence in the penal system in Puerto Rico. The penal guards and inmates cannot establish meaningful institutional relationships and this results in a greatly diminished capacity to control, conduct and deter unwanted behavior since the inmate culture goes unobserved and they are left to their own devices. A self-fulfilling prophecy then becomes the guards' modus operandi: it is dangerous to go into dormitories so the guards do not go into the dormitories which of course become dangerous. This attitude is also reinforced by the fact that guard 613 functions are *613 grossly undermanned at some institutions, bad classification procedures and improper training and supervision.
The intense overcrowding and lack of personal security forces inmates to live in conditions of tension and animosity which even invalidate psychological and psychiatric evaluations after an individual is exposed to the prevalent living conditions. The stress caused by overcrowding should be relieved by allowing inmates to participate in out-of-dorm or cell activities on a rotating basis, which, from the evidence before the Court, does not happen. Dr. Fogel also found that the educational, work and recreational programs are sporadic in operation, poor in quality, undermanned and, as everything else, deficient in record-keeping. They are not adapted to correctional needs: school programs for example, run for only ten months. The unavailability of programs and their haphazard organization deprive inmates of work and study time credits and extends the time of incarceration.
Administration by Improvisation
The defendants retained through counsel Mr. Sanger B. Power as their correctional expert. For an egregious but not untypical incident the defendants tried to keep Mr. Power's testimony from the Court. Mr. Power visited Puerto Rico's penal institutions as defendants's announced expert while hearings on the preliminary injunction were being held. A tight schedule for the visit and for Mr. Power's deposition by the plaintiffs prior to his testimony in Court was arranged. The plaintiffs' first subpoena to depose Mr. Power was quashed by the Court as not in accordance with the schedule. At this point the defendants decided not to call Mr. Power and to fly him out of Puerto Rico over the week-end. The plaintiffs then served a second subpoena on Mr. Power and noticed his deposition. Without informing the Court of their changed plans, counsel for the defendants obtained an ex-parte order to quash the subpoena and Mr. Power left Puerto Rico. Upon being fully advised on the matter the Court ordered the defendants to produce Mr. Power in Puerto Rico to be deposed by plaintiffs. His deposition was taken and, after the determination of objections by the defendants, read into the record. The defendants had reason to fear the testimony of their own expert.
Mr. Sanger B. Power has had thirty years' experience of correctional administration. He was the Warden of the Wisconsin State Penitentiary, Administrator of the Wisconsin Division of Corrections, and occasionally, Chairman of the Parole Board. He also was responsible for non-custodial programs as Administrator of Corrections, and the population of the institutions which he supervised was as varied as it is in the Commonwealth's institutions.
Two things struck the Court in reading Mr. Power's testimony: he is as tough as he is honest. He was also appalled at what he saw although he made gallant efforts not to express harsh opinions. When, for example, asked to evaluate the abilities of the then Administrator, he answered:
I would prefer not commenting on her ability, because I am not sure it would be fair to her, because I don't know her that well.

She is a nice person, and I understand a very fine person, professionally competent in her field, which I think is social work.

I can only say that her office, the [Administration] has not shown the kind of leadership qualities that I think are needed, and all you've got to do is go around and look at these joints and you can see what I mean. (Tr. 1919).

Mr. Power returned again and again to the same theme: The Administration is run on the principle of abdication of individual responsibilities: when asked to clarify a statement made in his report to the Administration to the effect that "It is disturbing yet typical, of finding the superintendent of Bayamón saying in his sworn statement that [t]he responsibility to maintain the Bayamón Jail in a state of cleanliness is the responsibility of the inmates of said institution"[,] he answered:

614

Well, that was in the deposition of the warden or the statement of the warden *614 when he was

asked who was responsible for the cleanliness, and he said it's the inmates responsibility.

And I find that shocking. Because I don't think it is the inmates responsibility. Because I think it is the responsibility, as warden, to see that the joint is clean.

Now, I think that he can delegate a lot of these responsibilities, and maybe it will end up with the inmate being responsible for keeping his own cell clean; that is fine. But to suggest that because the place is dirty, that it's the inmates fault, is what I am saying is a concept that has got to be changed.

You can't buck responsibility down to the inmates. That is a management responsibility. (Tr. 1970-1971).

And the Administration's overwhelming incompetence in running the institutions it purportedly operates clearly comes through.

Q. [* * *] My question is really directed to: do you feel that in order to implement any solution, the Court will have to name a master or a third person who will come in and do what they are doing in Rhode Island, for example?

A. I think that the administration that is there has demonstrated, by what I saw, for whatever reason it may be, an inability to run these institutions and establish, maintain acceptable standards.

You can see it. And it just seems to me that the Department of Corrections is going to, probably, need some money; these things cost money, to be sure. If you don't get enough money, nobody can do it. Okay?

But they are going to have to grab ahold and knock some heads together and ride herd out there. I like people in the states who are running institutions.

And I keep saying the only reason for the difference in Sabana Hoyos from a dirty, crummy place, is in the quality of the supervision, the extent to which the guy that is running Sabana Hoyos wants to run a neat, clean, decent, orderly operation, or does he want to shut his eyes and the hell with it and just let things go. But there has got to be strong, central direction and continuing supervision to see that the policies are, in fact, carried out. And there have to be standards established for such things as kitchens; Standards with respect to overall maintenance; plumbing, ventilation, the whole bit.

And I have not seen anything that suggests that the present administration has been doing that. And I seriously question that they can.

I think they need a strong director; capable of establishing goals, and the kind of personnel that he needs to see that things get done.

I don't want to say, yeah, that the Court should appoint a master or the Court should not appoint a master. I don't know whether I could properly 0907 I tell you, I don't know.
Q. But in some of the cases that you have intervened, that has been the way of doing things, of implementing the Court's order, naming a master who would oversee the system?
[A.] In Rhode Island, they did appoint a special master, and I guess I would have to say, if they hadn't done it, they might not be as far along as they are. (Tr. 1915-1917).
After a change in the Commonwealth's Government and a number of Administrators later, the Court, in September 1985, upon motions made by both sides, ordered the Administration to produce basic statistical information on the Administration's daily operations and on specific points of security measures long ago recommended to the Administration by its own chosen advisors and consultants. Voluminous documentation was filed in response to this order. Then the continuing disarray of administrative and supervisory functions became apparent 0907 unbelievably worsened.
The Administration had again, hired a consultant. Mrs. Mercedes Vargas, who has worked as a researcher in various projects in the criminal justice area, was retained to do a study of the Administration and its operations. 615 She was diverted from her study to compile the information *615 requested by the Court. What Mrs. Vargas revealed in her direct and cross-examination was the continued state of disarticulation to the point of anomie which still persists in the penal institutions. She described the system as a "complete, or almost complete improvisation." (Tr. Sept. 30, 1985, hereinafter T.H., at p. 58). This is so because "... this is basically an undocumented system in many, many vital areas. The policies and procedures are not written and are not known and there is no supervision 0907 first of all there is no adequate dissemination and second, there is no adequate supervision to see if the people are carrying out things that they should be." (Ibid.)
The situation concerning classification was described by Mrs. Vargas as in a flux. "They've been testing it, to the best of my ability I could not locate what the normative picture is right now." (T.H. 57). And classification practices "... differ from institution to institution and are overall inadequate." (Ibid., and see T.H. 81). Nor could the Administration provide information about the time inmates spent in protective custody. (T.H. 56). And about security in general, Mrs. Vargas noted that recommending what the regulatory scheme should be, since the recommending has already been done: "However, it is important to determine what is the status of the regulatory fixture [sic] in the institution[s], because, as of now the, what we have been able to determine is that nobody knows for certain which regulations are 0907 exist for what aspects, which exist but have not been approved, have been drafted but have not been approved, which [have] been approved but are not being implemented, etcetera." (T.H. 60).
There was, of course, no improvement in overcrowding and therefore no compliance with the preliminary injunction. To a question on overcrowding the answer was: "Improvement in actual overcrowding, no, of course not. The 0907 I mean, [the] mathematical fact [is] that it is worse." (T.H. 66). There are no records on recreational services (T.H. 83).
Counsel for the defendants admitted that "The defendants have established that the information system existing in the system is not verifiable." (T.H. 79-80 and 88). Counsel for defendants finally invited the Court's intervention: "Mr. RAMIREZ: We would not object to orders from the Court. We would like to have orders from the Court with specific issues and comply with that." (T.H. 99). That is an invitation which the Court must accept without oversteping the acknowledged limitations on the judicial function particularly in the area of prison litigation. Our immediate need, however, is to obtain accurate facts: by orders of even date the Court appoints two Monitors whose first duties will be to ascertain what is going on in the institutions which the Administration purports to operate. The defendants have objected to such an appointment but the Court cannot join them in the game of blind-man's buff by which they claim to administer a prison system. To enter specific orders without a factual basis and without a neutral observer responsible to the Court for evaluation and supervision of compliance with the issued orders would prolong the state of confusion which now exists in Puerto Rico's prisons.

The Implementation of the Preliminary Injunction
On September 5, 1980, the Court entered a preliminary injunction in this case, Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14 (P.R.1979). This Opinion and Order in no way affects that preliminary injunction. The measures mandated then had a temporary ameliorating effect on the delivery of health services in the Commonwealth's prison system. The plaintiffs twice sought and twice failed to hold defendants in contempt. But the last hearing on an order to show cause led, on the plaintiffs' motion acceded to by the defendants, to a series of inspections by the Court which have made it abundantly clear to us that non-compliance is greater than any improvement which may have occurred for a time. But improvement there was and what improvement there was 616 was due to the Court's intervention. See, for example, *616 the testimony of Dr. Frank Rundle, M.D., plaintiffs' own expert at the hearing held on October 5, 6, 1981 (Transcript passim, pp. 363-424). The program which produced these improvements has been dismantled within the last year.
Numerous compliance reports have been filed by the defendants, motions have been made to modify the injunction, to supplement the record, to release prisoners, hearings have been held, and attempts to reach a settlement have been frustrated mostly by the defendants' inability to come up with precise information and their unwillingness to commit themselves to specific goals that will turn the Administration around.
Nothing has been done to alleviate overcrowding. As the Administrator's own consultant admitted last September, the mathematical fact is that overcrowding is worse. Since 1980 one Administrator after the other has placed expectations for relief of overcrowding in a new institution to be built in Western Puerto Rico. The institution was built. And, then, through the political processes of the Commonwealth, the institution was determined to be better used as a hospital 0907 for which purpose substantial amounts of money will be expended. The monstruous overcrowding inflicts on the plaintiff class living conditions which can only be called brutalizing. And a substantial number of that class, it will be remembered, are pre-trial detainees who, whatever restrictions may be imposed constitutionally on their liberty, must not be punished. Living conditions in Puerto Rico's prisons are unusual in the extreme 0907 almost without parallel in the literature on prison conditions that we have canvassed 0907 and the cruelty of the punishment inflicted on those who may be punished is hard to believe.
The Court finds that continued litigation in a traditionally adversary pattern would protract the proceedings in this case and waste judicial resources, the time and energies of able counsel and the Administration's own resources. The time needed to establish a factual record through the Court's normal operations requires the presence in San Juan and in this Court of inmates dispersed through Puerto Rico, government employees who should be at work, records and medical charts, and the expenditure of money which such mobilization entails. The process has been expensive, cumbersome and inefficient. We therefore find that the appointment of two Monitors under Rule 53 Fed.R.Civ.P. is the proper and, in this case, even the necessary way to proceed. Otherwise, this Court would have to sit almost exclusively, and, for an indeterminate time, on this one case just to determine the factual issues in this case and to supervise the implementation of its decree.
The Court has given the Administration and all of the defendants enough of an opportunity to act on the conditions which for so long have been obvious to them. We must now pursue another route. Morris v. Travisono, 707 F.2d 28 (1st Cir.1983).
THE LEGAL STANDARDS
The Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States prohibits "cruel and unusual punishment" and is applicable to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico either through incorporation into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660, 82 S.Ct. 1417, 8 L.Ed.2d 758 (1962), or because the Eighth Amendment itself is applicable to Puerto Rico since a long history of its application here shows that it poses no dangers to national interests or risk of unfairness. See, Torres v. Puerto Rico, 442 U.S. 465, 99 S.Ct. 2425, 61 L.Ed.2d 1 (1979). There is further clear indication that the Congress has implicitly determined that it should be so. Act of March 2, 1917, c. 145 § 2, 39 Stat. 951. We, therefore, hold that the Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment is applicable to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

The statement of the facts in this case identifies the applicable legal standards. The conditions which have prevailed in the prisons of Puerto Rico result from deliberate indifference to the medical and basic human needs 617 of the plaintiff *617 class and constitute the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain, which is forbidden by the Eighth Amendment. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed. 2d 251 (1976), citing, Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976) (opinion of Stewart, Powell and Stevens J.J.). Those conditions are also totally without penological or other justification. Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981). This case is so far from a problem of double-celling at an "unquestionably top-flight, first class facility[,]", 452 U.S. at 341, 101 S.Ct. at 2396; Chapman v. Rhodes, 434 F.Supp. 1007, 1009 (S.D.Ohio 1977), that our only problem in holding that the Eighth Amendment rights of the plaintiff class have been violated, arises from the fact that minimal constitutional standards are so far above what we have found in these prisons that it is difficult to establish a conceptual relationship between the conditions now existing in Puerto Rico's jails and the standards elaborated by other federal courts. The Eighth Amendment "embodies `broad and idealistic concepts of dignity, civilized standards, humanity, and decency ...'", 429 U.S. at 102, 97 S.Ct. at 290, quoting, Jackson v. Bishop, 404 F.2d 571, 579 (8th Cir. 1968), and it forbids "punishments which are incompatible with `the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.'" 429 U.S., Ibid., quoting, Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 101, 78 S.Ct. 590, 598, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958) (other citations omitted). The Administration, however much of an administrative improvisation it may be, seems to be designed to violate every principle and standard deducible from the Eighth Amendment.
Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. at 346-347, 101 S.Ct. at 2399, has pointed out a path for decisions by pointing out that "The Court has held, however, that Eighth Amendment judgments should neither be nor appear to be merely the subjective views of judges. To be sure, the Constitution contemplates that in the end a court's own judgment will be brought to bear on the question of acceptability of a given punishment. But such judgments should be informed by objective factors to the maximum possible extent. For example, when the question was whether capital punishment for certain crimes violated contemporary values, the Court looked for objective indicia derived from history, the action of state legislatures, and the sentencing by juries." (Citations, quotation marks and brackets omitted).
The Court went on to specify at page 347 that:
These principles apply when the conditions of confinement compose the punishment at issue. Conditions must not involve the wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain, nor may they be grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime warranting imprisonment. In Estelle v. Gamble, supra, we held that the denial of medical care is cruel and unusual because, in the worst case, it can result in physical torture, and, even in less serious cases, it can result in pain without any penological purpose. 429 U.S. at 103 [97 S.Ct. at 290] In Hutto v. Finney, [437 U.S. 678, 98 S.Ct. 2565, 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978)] the conditions of confinement in two Arkansas prisons constituted cruel and unusual punishment because they resulted in unquestioned and serious deprivations of basic human needs. Conditions other than those in Gamble and Hutto, alone or in combination, may deprive inmates of the minimal civilized measure of life's necessities. Such conditions could be cruel and unusual under the contemporary standard of decency that we recognized in Gamble, supra, [429 U.S.] at 103-104 [97 S.Ct. at 290-91]. But conditions that cannot be said to be cruel and unusual under contemporary standards are not unconstitutional. To the extent that such conditions are restrictive and even harsh, they are part of the penalty that criminal offenders pay for their offenses against society.
The defendants have frequently insisted that we look to Puerto Rican realities and values in judging the case 618 before us. Let us then look at the legislative enactments of the people of Puerto Rico to find there *618 societal
values on punishment. The Constitution of Puerto Rico forbids capital punishment in absolute terms: "The death penalty shall not exist." Article II, § 7. And in Section 12 of the same Article the Commonwealth Constitution reads in pertinent part: "Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist except in the latter case as a punishment for crime after the accused has been duly convicted. Cruel and unusual punishments shall not be inflicted. Suspension of civil rights including the right to vote shall cease upon service of the term of imprisonment imposed."[10] Section 15 of the Bill of Rights further provides that "No child less than sixteen years of age shall

be kept in a jail or penitentiary." All of these rights "shall not be construed restrictively." Art. II, § 19. And, finally, Article VI, § 19 establishes that "It shall be the public policy of the Commonwealth [...] to regulate its penal institutions in a manner that effectively achieves their purposes and to provide, within the limits of available resources, for adequate treatment of delinquents in order to make possible their moral and social rehabilitation."

Although not specifically directed to penological issues, Article II, § 1, also sheds light on the values which govern the Commonwealth's legal system: "The dignity of the human being is inviolable." This precept encompasses expansive values and operates without need of statutory enactments. Figueroa Ferrer v. Commonwealth, 107 D.P.R. 250 (1978).

These indicia of the community values are expanded by the statutory law governing imprisonment and parole. The Administration is regulated by the Organic Act of the Correctional Administration, Title 4 of the Laws of Puerto Rico Annotated. Section 5 of the Act, 4 L.P.R.A. § 1112, provides in part that the Administration shall have the following functions and powers:

(b) To organize correctional services to the effect that the rehabilitation shall have highest priority within the goals of the Commonwealth Government. To that end: (1) to design a new diversified system of institutions, programs, and human resources which makes it feasible to establish a better individualized treatment; (2) to proliferate the creation of smaller institutions, either semiclosed, open or of any other kind, so as to permit a treatment that will help the inmate to return to the free community within the shortest possible time; (3) to use rehabilitation methods in the community in the widest dimension possible whenever it is compatible with public security; (4) to incorporate in the rehabilitative process ample opportunities to acquire skills, training and knowledge which will expedite the inmates return to the community duly equipped to insure a decorous living; and (5) to channel the support of the citizenry to new rehabilitative programs in the community buttressed by voluntary services.

[* * *]

(f) To establish programs to offer adequate medical care and hospital services intended to prevent diseases and the diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of the patient.

The services may be furnished, whenever the circumstances so require, outside Administration facilities under the necessary security measures.

Detailed records of medical examinations and the health condition of the patient shall be kept.

(g) To create all the individualized programs which may be necessary to meet the system's

619

requirements in order to *619 provide academic, vocational, and training education of any kind,

under proper counseling. These programs shall be guided to meet the prevailing requirements

and conditions in the labor market, with a view to obtaining adequate living means. These

programs shall be envisioned, besides, in such a way as to facilitate their recognition and

accreditation by the proper government and private agencies. The necessary exchange and

coordination with said entities shall be maintained.

(h) To develop and obtain ever possible source of work to propitiate the rehabilitation of the inmates and help the released inmates. To broaden the opportunities of work by means of direct economic aid, incentives, subsidies, counseling or any other type of aid in order that its inmates and released inmates promote or participate in industrial, commercial, agricultural or any other kind of projects and activities.

To this effect the agencies and public corporations of the Commonwealth Government and the municipalities are hereby authorized to transfer funds or contribute with any available services, counseling or other resources to the Administration, under the conditions stated in the agreements.

[* * *]

The working conditions of the inmates shall be similar, in every possible way, to those prevailing for regular workers, subject to the regulations established.
We cannot enforce those statutory commands by injunctions. But, they are clear indications of the penological standards set by the legislative branch of the Commonwealth and indicate the societal values by which we will be guided in giving content to the Eighth Amendment principles enunciated by the Supreme Court. The high standards set by Puerto Rico's Legislative Assembly also disposes of the defendants' contention that the Commonwealth is too poor to live by nationally applicable constitutional standards: if the defendants complied with the statutory mandate, the conditions of imprisonment in Puerto Rico would be as far above the requirements as they are at present below. Furthermore, there is now more evidence of misadministration than of lack of economic resources.
The Administration fails in its constitutionally required obligation to provide inmates "reasonably adequate [ ...] shelter, sanitation, medical care, and personal safety." Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283, 291 (5th Cir.1977). The shelter provided also fails to include, as it must, "reasonably adequate ventilation [Aguadilla, Arecibo, Ponce, Humacao, Miramar] sanitation, beding, hygienic materials and utilities (i.e., hot and cold water, light, heat, plumbing)." Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 568 (10th Cir.1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 1041, 101 S.Ct. 1759, 68 L.Ed.2d 239 (1981). Nor are fire safety conditions constitutionally acceptable throughout the system and some of these institutions are housed in buildings which are tinder boxes (Ponce, Arecibo). Leeds v. Watson, 630 F.2d 674, 675-6 (9th Cir.1980); Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d 1115, 1152-3 (5th Cir.1982).
Reasonable protection from the constant threat of violence, terror, physical aggression, sexual assaults, is also required by the Constitution. Ramos v. Laam, 639 F.2d at 572; Woodhous v. Virginia, 487 F.2d 889 (4th Cir.1973); Jones v. Diamond, 636 F.2d 1364 (5th Cir.1981), cert. dismissed sub nom. Ledbetter v. Jones, 453 U.S. 950, 102 S.Ct. 27, 69 L.Ed. 2d 1033 (1981). The protection to the plaintiff class is all the more lacking when the representatives of the state government, in this case Administration officials and employees, abdicate the governance of prison life into the hands of organized, island-wide gangs.
The absence of rehabilitative programs is not, per se, a violation of the Eighth Amendment. Bono v. Saxbe, 620 F.2d 609, 615 (7th Cir.1980). But, there are considerations here which make a significant difference: the Administration is under a statutory duty to provide such programs, 4 L.P.R.A. § 1112; inmates can earn time credits towards an early release by participating in such programs, 4 L.P. R.A. §§ 1162, 1164, 1165; and the 620 unavailability *620 of any form of useful work, study or even recreation in the overcrowded conditions in the system, inflict serious psychological harm on the inmates. We will first examine this last point under Eighth Amendment standards.
The doctrine of psychological harm has been more frequently discussed in relation to solitary isolation than in the factual context of the totality of circumstances which characterize the instant case. As such, it was received with skeptic caution by the First Circuit in Jackson v. Meachum, 699 F.2d 578 (1st Cir.1983), which discussed thoroughly the issues and cases. But, in Morris v. Travisono, 707 F.2d 28, 32 n. 9 (1st Cir.1983), the Court made it clear that factual variations on Jackson do make a difference in the application of psychological deterioration doctrines. In Jackson the Court had already stated that "to accept plaintiff's proposition that there is a constitutional right to preventive therapy where psychological deterioration threatens, notwithstanding that the physical conditions of confinement clearly meet or exceed minimal standards, would make the Eighth Amendment a guarantor of a prison inmate's prior mental health. Such a view, however civilized, would go measurably beyond what today would generally be deemed `cruel and unusual'." 699 F.2d at 583.
In this case, where none of the physical conditions of confinement meet constitutional standards, the facts of overcrowding, idleness and the threat of violence, combined with the continuous frustration of reasonable expectations produced by administrative incompetence, do result in an ascertainable psychological deterioration in the prison population which, we hold, is independently cognizable under the Eighth Amendment. See and compare: Bono v. Saxbe, 620 F.2d at 614; Ramos v. Laam, 639 F.2d at 566-7; Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. at 687, 98 S.Ct. at 2571; Battle v. Anderson, 564 F.2d 388 (10th Cir.1977); Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F.2d 44 (4th Cir. 1977) (discusses the place of psychiatric treatment in prison law). The psychological deterioration inflicted on

plaintiffs in this case is "an unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain." Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. at 104, 97 S.Ct. at 291.
But the irregularities in the administration of work and study programs also results in violations of plaintiffs' due process rights. When those who can study or work are given these opportunities, and when the opportunities are taken away, by irregularities in classification or the Administration's inability to provide a safe environment, the plaintiffs are deprived of the liberty interest implicated in the statutorily created expectation that imprisonment can be shortened by work and study without the due process of law. Garcia v. Batista, 642 F.2d 11 (1st Cir.1981); Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 557, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 2975, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (minimum procedures in disciplinary proceedings must be observed to insure that good-time credit state-created rights are not arbitrarily abrogated). Random deprivations which result from the reckless conduct of state officials and employees who operate an "improvised" prison system is tantamount to the arbitrary abrogation of the plaintiffs' state-created right to obtain good-time credits.
The same due process analysis can be used to examine the deprivation of plaintiffs' expectation to be heard by the Parole Board to determine their eligibility for parole which is regulated by statute, 4 L.P.R. A. §§ 1503, 1504. There is a clear expectation that, whether parole is granted or not in the Board's discretion, an inmate will be heard and allowed an opportunity to establish his eligibility. Parole is, even under restrictions, a substantial change from conditions of incarceration and implicates a cognizable liberty interest. Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972). Thus, if the inmate has a right to have his eligibility determined, the capricious and arbitrary denial of an opportunity to be heard is a deprivation of liberty without the due process of law. To prepare his application for parole the inmate must repy on a social-penal worker: they are overworked 621 to the point of inefficiency, ignore the criteria for granting or denying parole, and receive *621 little or no support services in compiling an inmate's dosier. The inmate must therefore rely on insufficient and speculative help and advice to prepare his hearing in spite of statutes and regulations which would, if only they were obeyed, produce an orderly and rational process.
There is little need for our present purposes to belabor the obvious. We have already dealt with medical and psychiatric services in the Court's preliminary injunction which closed the "calabozos" and also set standards to deal with overcrowding and to provide for basic hygienic needs. What must be done now is to establish the extent and, perhaps, the reasons for noncompliance and to refine the data on which the Court can enter a final injunction which will not be a brutum fulmen and cause further chaos in the system or become academic. The Administration has admitted its inability to provide us with information that is reliable. Further courtroom litigation, we have concluded, will be overburdensome and unduly protract the proceedings. Monitors are an imperative need in this case.
What must be clear at present is that the constitutional rights of the plaintiffs have been violated and continue to be violated. Any test that we apply establishes a violation of the Eighth Amendment because the totality of conditions in these institutions "involve the wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain" of every kind on the plaintiffs' because that pain is "without any penological purpose"; because those conditions result "in unquestioned and serious deprivations of basic human needs" and "alone or in combination, [do] deprive inmates of the minimal civilized measure of life's necessities", indeed deprive inmates of their lives. Under any "contemporary standard of decency" these conditions are cruel and unusual. Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. at 347, 101 S.Ct. at 2399.
The chaotic administration, the reckless indifference of state officials to the absence of standards, disorganization in procedures and to daily violations of statutory law and regulations deprive inmates of liberty without the due process of law.
For this memorandum opinion we have not dealt separately with the rights of pretrial detainees. Suffice it to say that the finding that they live commingled with the convicted population and that the conclusion that the conditions which prevail in all of the closed institutions are violative of the Eighth Amendment rights of convicted inmates, is sufficient basis to hold that pre-trial detainees are being punished before conviction and that they have therefore been deprived and continue to be deprived of their liberty without due process of law.

The Court therefore holds that the constitutional rights of the plaintiff class guaranteed to them by the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States have been and continue to be violated by the defendants. Two separate orders will issue in contemplation of the entry of a final decree on plaintiffs' prayer for declaratory and injunctive relief.
ORDER OF REFERENCE
In a Memorandum Opinion entered this date the Court has found that there is widespread noncompliance with its September 5, 1980, preliminary emergency injunction and that conditions throughout Puerto Rico's adult penal institutions are unconstitutional. For the reasons set forth in this Order of Reference, the Court will appoint two Court Monitors to make a current assessment of the state of defendants' compliance with its September 5, 1980, order, to report on conditions disclosed by evidence subsequently heard and seen by the Court, and to prepare a proposed detailed remedial order calculated to bring about constitutional conditions throughout the correctional system. On receipt of the Court Monitors' findings and recommendations, and after independent review of those findings and recommendations, the Court will issue a final order, including complete findings of fact and conclusions of law, and a comprehensive remedial injunction including the continued use of the Court Monitors to monitor defendants' compliance with that injunction.
622 *622 This action was commenced by a prisoner's letter addressed to the Court on November 9, 1978. Counsel was appointed to represent the complainant on January 3, 1979, and a complaint was filed on February 7 of that year. Following certification of the action as a class action pursuant to Rule 23 F.R.Civ.P. and lengthy discovery, a hearing commenced on May 27, 1980, on plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. After 17 days of hearings, the Court, by order entered on September 5, 1980, granted emergency relief to the plaintiff class in a number of areas. Feliciano v. Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1979).[1] Further proceedings on plaintiffs' application for permanent injunction were held from November 12, 1980, through March 2, 1981. The Court has supplemented the record by admission of documentary evidence at various times since then. In addition, between May 23 and June 30, 1984, the Court personally inspected Bayamón, the State Penitentiary, the Intensive Treatment Unit (UTI), Miramar, Guayama, Camp Guavate, Ponce, Arecibo, Humacao and Vega Alta. On October 28, 1985, the Court again visited Bayamón, Ponce, the State Penitentiary and the Intensive Treatment Unit (UTI). Without question, all evidence received and viewed by the Court to date demonstrates that conditions throughout Puerto Rico's correctional system fall far short of constitutionally mandated minimum standards and conditions.
On August 26, 1985, the Court directed defendants to report on the state of their compliance with the Court's September 5, 1980, preliminary injunction. By defendants' own admission during the course of a hearing held on September 30, 1985, the report filed by them was not reliable for lack of proper verification. Nonetheless, the Court finds that defendants' report corroborates the Court's finding of pervasive unconstitutional conditions in all of Puerto Rico's prisons, as well as defendants' inability or unwillingness to provide the Court with accurate information regarding defendants' state of compliance with the September 5, 1980, order.
As the Memorandum Opinion entered today demonstrates, the Court's 1980 order has been largely ignored by defendants. The record of intransigence and lengthy noncompliance by defendants constitutes an "exceptional condition" within the meaning of Rule 53(b) authorizing the appointment of a Court Monitor. Gary W. v. Louisiana, 601 F.2d 240 (5th Cir.1979). This record also convinces the Court that the achievement of compliance with the Court's current and prospective remedial orders in this case will be unusually difficult and complex, and that, in the absence of a reference, such compliance is unlikely ever to be achieved. Antiquated, overcrowded facilities, several of which may be unsalvagable for the continued housing of prisoners, longstanding tolerance by defendants of filthy and dangerous conditions throughout many of the institutions involved in this action, and the apparent inability or unwillingness of successive Correction Administrators to make significant progress toward compliance with the Court's 1980 order all mandate the appointment of a Court Monitor. Indeed, all of the factors cited by another district court and approved by the court of appeals as justifying the appointment of a special master are present in this case:

the difficulty of superintending the implementation of "a comprehensive, detailed plan for the elimination of the unconstitutional conditions found to exist in the Texas prison system"; TDC's "record of intransigence toward previous court orders requiring changes in TDC's practices and conditions"; the "strained" working relations between TDC's lawyers and the plaintiffs' lawyers; TDC's failure to acknowledge even "completely evident" constitutional violations; and TDC's failure to conform its actual practices to its written policies and procedures.
Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d at 1160 (5th Cir. 1982).
Thus, the appointment of a court monitor in this case is fully justified under the "exceptional condition" 623 requirement of *623 Rule 53; moreover, it is equally clear that the rule
does not terminate or modify the district court's inherent equitable power to appoint a person, whatever be his title, to assist it in administering a remedy. The power of a federal court to appoint an agent to supervise the implementation of its decrees has long been established.... The function is clear, whatever the title.
Ruiz v. Estelle, 679 F.2d at 1161 (5th Cir. 1982). This principle was enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Exparte Peterson, 253 U.S. 300, 40 S.Ct. 543, 64 L.Ed. 919 (1920), in the following language:
Courts have (at least in the absence of legislation to the contrary) inherent power to provide themselves with appropriate instruments required for the performance of their duties.... This power includes authority to appoint persons unconnected with the court to aid judges in the performance of specific judicial duties, as they may arise in the progress of a cause. From the commencement of our Government, it has been exercised by the federal courts, when sitting in equity, by appointing, either with or without the consent of the parties, special masters, auditors, examiners and commissioners.
253 U.S. at 312-313, 40 S.Ct. at 547.
The appointment of agents to supervise the implementation of remedial decrees in institutional reform litigation involving prisons and jails is well precedented. See, Nathan, The Use of Masters in Institutional Reform Litigation, 10 Tol.L.Rev. 419 (1979), and Special Project, "The Remedial Process in Institutional Reform Litigation," 78 Colum.L.Rev. 784 (1978). Precedent for such an appointment exists in this circuit as well as in others. Palmigiano v. Garrahy, 443 F.Supp. 956 (D.R.I. 1977); Bel v. Hall, 392 F.Supp. 274 (D.Mass.1975).
For the reasons set forth above, as well as those detailed in its Memorandum Opinion of this date, the Court hereby APPOINTS Vincent M. Nathan and Frederick Byers to serve as Court Monitors in this cause. Both Messrs. Nathan and Byers are members of the law firm of Nathan & Roberts, in Toledo, Ohio.
Mr. Nathan graduated from the University of Oklahoma College of Law in 1959. He was a member of the faculty of the College of Law of the University of Toledo for 16 years, during the last 10 of which he served as a professor of law. He has been appointed by district courts to act as a special master or special monitor in five cases: Taylor v. Perini, involving Marion Correctional Institution in Marion, Ohio; Jones v. Wittenberg, involving the Lucas County Jail in Toledo, Ohio; Guthrie v. Evans, involving Georgia State Prison in Reidsville, Georgia; Ruiz v. Estelle, involving the entire Texas prison system; and Duran v. Anaya, involving all medium, close and maximum security prisons in the State of New Mexico.
Mr. Nathan is the author of "The Use of Masters in Institutional Reform Litigation", 10 Tol.L.Rev. 419 (1979), which was republished and distributed by the Federal Judicial Center. He has served as a consultant for the National Institute of Corrections and is an acknowledged expert in the field of implementation of judicial decrees in a correctional setting. Without question, he is the most experienced individual in the United States in monitoring compliance with federal court decrees relating to prison and jail conditions, having been appointed by district courts throughout the country to oversee compliance with complex remedial orders in litigation virtually identical to that in Puerto Rico.

Mr. Byers is a 1981 graduate of Harvard Law School. From June 1981 through August 1982 he served as law clerk to the Honorable William Wayne Justice, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. During the period of his clerkship, Mr. Byers assisted the district court in numerous proceedings relating to its remedial order in Ruiz v. Estelle.
Like Mr. Nathan, Mr. Byers has had exceptionally broad experience in monitoring remedial decrees in institutional 624 reform litigation. He served as Assistant to the Special Monitor in Guthrie v. Evans and is *624 the Deputy Special
Master in Duran v. Anaya, cases that have been mentioned above. In April 1984 Mr. Byers was appointed by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia to serve as monitor in Fambro v. Fulton County, a case involving conditions in the Fulton County Jail in Atlanta, Georgia.
In summary, Messrs. Nathan and Byers represent a wealth of experience in the field of monitoring judicial decrees mandating reform of correctional institutions. They have worked together on two important cases. The scope and complexity of the problems in Puerto Rico's prisons and jails require the degree of expertise possessed by these two individuals. Moreover, the appointment of Messrs. Nathan and Byers as co-monitors will permit them to exercise full and independent authority under this order of reference to fulfill effectively the myriad responsibilities assigned to them.
In addition to appointing Messrs. Nathan and Byers, the Court will authorize the employment by the Court Monitors of two assistants. These individuals should be attorneys or correctional experts with the ability to assist the Court Monitors in executing their responsibilities under this Order of Reference. The Assistants to the Court Monitors will be nominated by the Court Monitors for approval by the Court, and their level of compensation will be set by the Court. Both assistants will be required to devote substantially full time to their assignments, and both should be fluent in the Spanish language.[2]
As their first duty, the Court Monitors shall file a report detailing defendants' current state of compliance with the Court's order of September 5, 1980, and reporting on conditions disclosed by evidence received by the Court to date. The Court Monitors' report shall recommend specific remedial action required to be taken in order to eliminate the unconstitutional practices and conditions found by the Court to exist. In particular, the Monitors shall recommend the maximum population that can be accommodated in each of Puerto Rico's institutions to insure amelioration of the unconstitutional conditions reflected in the Court's findings regarding overcrowding. In addition, the report of the Court Monitors shall address the subjects of delivery of medical care, housing and teatment of mentally ill prisoners, environmental deficiencies throughout the system, excessive use of force, classification of prisoners, denial of rehabilitative programs, inadequate treatment for drug and alcohol addiction, lack of meaningful assistance for reintegration into the community, the absence of law libraries and lack of meaningful access to courts, failure to provide adequate protective custody and protection to prisoners, absence of due process and the use of brutality in connection with the disciplinary process, enforced idleness, and violation of the Court's prior order requiring due process and equal protection in the granting of paroles, including the absence of objective standards for parole decisions and practices and procedures of defendants that have the effect of delaying parole and thereby exacerbating the crowded conditions of the institutions. After the submission of their initial report, the Court Monitors shall continue to monitor and report the state of defendants' compliance with all provisions of the Court's remedial decree in this cause and shall make recommendations to the Court concerning steps that should be taken by defendants to achieve compliance.
All actions of the Court Monitors and their assistants shall be under the direct control and supervision of the Court. In particular, the Court Monitors and other persons operating on the Court's behalf shall not intervene in 625 the administrative management of the Correction Administration of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico *625 or any of its institutions. The Court Monitors and their assistants shall not be empowered to direct defendants or any of their subordinates to take or to refrain from taking any specific action to achieve compliance. The sole power to direct compliance and to punish noncompliance remains with the Court. The duties of the Court Monitors, then, shall be to observe, monitor, find facts, report or testify as to their findings, and make recommendations to the Court concerning remedial action that must be taken in order to eliminate unconstitutional conditions that have been found by the Court to exist. The Court Monitors may and should assist defendants in every possible

manner, and to this end they may and should confer informally with defendants and their subordinates on matters affecting compliance. In order to accomplish these objectives, the Court Monitors shall have the following powers:
1. The Court Monitors shall have unlimited access to any facilities, buildings or premises under the jurisdiction or control of the Correction Administration of Puerto Rico and no advance notice of any visit or inspection shall be required.
2. The Court Monitors shall have unlimited access to the records, files and papers maintained by defendants to the extent that such access is related to the performance of the Monitors' duties under this Order of Reference. Such access shall include all departmental, institutional, and inmate records, including but not limited to parole records, medical records and mental health records. The Court Monitors may obtain copies of all such relevant records, files and papers.
3. The Court Monitors may conduct confidential interviews with all staff members and employees of defendants. In addition, they may engage in informal conferences with such staff members and employees, and such persons shall cooperate with the Court Monitors and respond to all inquiries and requests related to compliance with the Court's orders in this cause. The Court Monitors may require compilation and communication of oral or written information relevant to such compliance.
4. The Court Monitors may conduct confidential interviews and meetings with any prisoner or group of prisoners under the jurisdiction of the Correction Administartion of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, so long as such meetings are held at the institution to which such prisoners are confined.
5. The Court Monitors may attend any parole hearing, or any formal institutional meetings or proceedings at any institution under the jurisdiction of the Correction Administration.
6. The Court Monitors may require written reports from defendants or any staff member or employee of defendants regarding compliance with this Court's orders.
7. The Court Monitors shall have the full power to order and conduct hearings with respect to defendants' compliance with the Court's orders in this cause. To this end they shall have the power to require the attendance of witnesses, including prisoners, the defendants and any employees of any defendant, and they shall exercise all other powers described in subsection (c) of Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
8. The Court Monitors may select and employ necessary administrative, clerical and support staff. All such persons, as well as the nature of their compensation, shall be approved by the Court in advance of their employment. In addition, with advance permission of the Court, the Court Monitors may employ independent experts and specialists to assist them in fulfilling the responsibilities assigned by this Order of Reference.
9. In exercising the powers enumerated in paragraphs 1 through 6, supra, the Court Monitors may act by themselves or through Assistants to the Monitors approved by the Court. All actions of such Assistants, however, shall be supervised and coordinated by the Court Monitors in order to accomplish the objectives of this reference.
As has been discussed above, the Court Monitors will be responsible for submitting reports from time to time 626 containing findings *626 concerning defendants' compliance with the provisions of the Court's orders and the
need, if any, for supplemental remedial action. The following procedures shall control the submission of reports by the Court Monitors:
1. Any report prepared by the Court Monitors may be submitted to the parties in draft form as provided for in Rule 53(e)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In the event that any report is submitted to the parties in draft form, the period for informal comments shall be established by the Court Monitors.

2. The Court Monitors shall file their reports with the Court. Any party may file written objections to a report of the Court Monitors within 15 days of the filing thereof with the Court. If the report has been submitted to the parties in draft form, however, no objection may be filed that has not been raised during the period for informal comments established by the Court Monitors. Otherwise, any party may file written objections to a report of the Court Monitors within 15 days of the filing thereof with the Court. The objecting party shall note each particular finding or recommendation to which objection is made, shall provide proposed alternative findings and may request a hearing before the Court.
3. Any request for a hearing before the Court must include a list of witnesses and documents to be presented at the hearing. A copy of the request for hearing, the objections and proposed findings shall be served on all parties and the Court Monitors.
4. The Court Monitors may submit reports based upon their observations and investigations in the absence of a formal hearing before them. In such event, the Court Monitors' findings must be based upon evidence that is made part of the record before the Court. Unless unobjected to, findings of the Court Monitors based on such observations and investigations shall not be accorded any presumption of correctness and the "clearly erroneous" rule shall not apply to them.
5. The Court Monitors also may submit reports based upon hearings held by them. In such instances the reports and findings contained therein shall be treated in accordance with the provisions of Rule 53 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In particular, the Court Monitors' findings of fact in these instances shall be accepted by the Court unless shown to be clearly erroneous. Any evidence not previously presented to the Court Monitors in the course of the formal hearing preceding their report shall be admitted at a hearing before the Court only upon a showing that the party offering it lacked a reasonable opportunity to present the evidence to the Court Monitors.
The Court Monitors shall not be authorized to hear matters that should be appropriately be the subject of separate judicial proceedings, such as actions under 42 U.S. C.A. 1983, and their duties shall be restricted to those set forth in this order.
Mr. Nathan shall be compensated at the rate of One Hundred and Ten Dollars ($110) per hour, and Mr. Byers shall be compensated at the rate of Eighty-Five Dollars ($85.00) per hour, for services performed in accordance with this Order of Reference. Appropriate compensation for members of the Court Monitors' staff shall be established by the Court upon the recommendation of the Court Monitors and after notice to all parties. All reasonable expenses incurred by the Court Monitors and their staff in the course of the performance of their duties, including but not limited to the rental of office space in Puerto Rico, customary office expenses, salaries of staff, long distance telephone, photocopying, printing, travel, data processing, postage and bookkeeping, shall be reimbursed. Defendants are encouraged to reduce the cost of the monitorship by providing suitable office space, office furnishings and equipment, and an automobile for the Court Monitors' use in Puerto Rico.
The cost of the monitorship shall be borne by defendants as costs in this action. The Court Monitors shall submit 627 to the Court periodic statements of time and expenses *627 for review and approval by the Court.
Defendants are hereby ORDERED to deposit the sum of One Hundred Fifty Thousand Dollars ($150,000.00) with the Clerk of this Court as interim payment of costs. This sum shall be transferred by the Clerk to the Court Monitors, by check made payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation and addressed to Nathan & Roberts, 644 Spitzer Building, 520 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio 43604, for investment in an interest bearing account, and payments to the Court Monitors out of these funds shall be approved by order of the Court. All interest earned in the account established by the Court Monitors shall accrue to the benefit of defendants. As payments are approved, defendants shall deposit additional sums with the Clerk as the Court may order and direct, and these sums shall be forwarded by the Clerk to the Court Monitors in the manner and for the purpose set forth above.

The Court Monitors may cause copies of this Order of Reference, or portions thereof, to be posted in any facility under the jurisdiction of the Correction Administration of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and may cause such copies to be distributed to prisoners within such facilities and to employees of any of the defendants. This Order of Reference shall be translated into the Spanish language by an official translator of the Court, and a copy of the translated order shall be sent by the Clerk to all counsel and the Court Monitors.
Any action required or permitted to be taken by the Court Monitors under this Order of Reference may be taken by either of them in his own name, or jointly by both of them.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] After the commencement of this action several cases have been consolidated herewith: 76-350, Méndez v. People of P.R.; 76-543, Díaz v. Cruz de Batista; 77-1152, Guadalupe v. Romero Barceló; 78-249, Re: Wilfredo Correa Suárez; 78-295, Gonzalez v. Parole Board of P.R.; 78-1286, Trujillo v. Romero Barceló; 78-1698, Caballero v. Cruz de Batista; 78-1912, Ramirez v. Cruz de Batista; 78-2138, Santana v. Cruz de Batista; 78-2204, Medina Vázquez v. Cruz de Batista; 79-4, Morales v. Parole Board of P.R.; 79-688, Figueroa Lugo v. Romero Barceló; 79-1025, Santiago v. Cruz de Batista; 79-1112, Inmates Bayamón Regional Inst. v. Cruz de Batista; 79-1128, Cintrón Ramos v. Cruz de Batista; 79-1234, Natal Rosario v. Romero Barceló; 79-1673, Esteves v. Romero Barceló; 79-1705, Chacón v. Romero Barceló; 79-1706, Cintrón v. Romero Barceló; 79-1707, Román Vega v. Romero Barceló; 79-1708, Villalobos v. Romero Barceló; 79-1709, Vega v. Romero Barceló; 79-1710, Soto v. Romero Barceló; 79-1712, Vargas v. Romero Barceló; 79-1713, Badillo v. Romero Barceló; 79-1714, Sanabria v. Romero Barceló; 79-1715, López v. Romero Barceló; 79-1716, Pérez v. Romero Barceló; 79-1717, Troche v. Romero Barceló; 79-1718, Ramos v. Romero Barceló; 79-1719, Colón Marrero v. Romero Barceló; 79-1720 Velázquez v. Romero Barceló; 79-2069, Agostini v. Cruz de Batista; 79-2470, Martino v. Maldonado; 79-2505, Cruz v. Romero Barceló; 79-2514, Rivera v. Parole Commission; 79-2527, Arce. v. Romero Barceló; 79-2623, González v. Cruz de Batista; 79-2710, Acosta v. Romero Barceló; 79-2874, Vega v. Vélez; 80-256, Natal v. Cruz de Batista; 80-269, Natal v. Cruz de Batista; 80-274, Cotto v. Romero Barceló; 80-378, Rodriguez v. Romero Barceló; 80-380, Wilson v. Cruz de Batista; 80-417, Nuñez v. Romero Barceló; 80-418, Diaz v. Romero Barceló; 80-420, González v. Romero Barceló; 80-969, Diaz v. Cruz de Batista; 80-1125, Matias v. Romero Barceló; 80-1860, Román v. Romero Barceló; 80-1861, Ríos v. Romero Barceló; 80-2286, Gordon v. Romero; 80-2500, Santiago v. Cruz de Batista; 81-138, López v. Romero Barceló; 81-423, In re: Arriaga Salamán, Freddy; 81-428, Almética v. Cruz; 81-788, Hernández v. Warden of State Pen.; 81-1908, Medina Vázquez, Enrique; 82-1457, Rivera v. Jiménez; 83-1104, Muñiz v. Pérez; 84-182, Acosta Ramos v. Corrections Administration; 83-3145, William Rivera Rivera v. Collazo; 83-2372, Nazario Ortiz Alvarado v. Rodriquez Fortier; 84-1154, Miguel Castro Nieves v. Zulma Rosario; 84-1808, In Re: Inmates of State Pen. v. Jorge Collazo; 85-1730, In Re: Inmates at Ponce Dist. Jail.
[2] The preliminary injunction Opinion and Order entered in this action appears at 497 F.Supp. 14 (P.R.1980).
[3] As part of its power to afford complete relief the Court in addition to an injunction may award damages in the same action. Restatement of Torts, 2nd ed. § 951 at 626. Local 391 Intern. Broth. of Teamsters, etc. v. City of Rocky Mount, 672 F.2d 376 (4th Cir.1982); Tritron Intern. v. Velto, 525 F.2d 432, 438 (9th Cir.1975); Rolax v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 186 F.2d 473, 480 (4th Cir.1951). In the instant case findings of fact made prior to the issuance of a permanent injunction do not preclude plaintiffs to present proof before the jury on the damages issue. Here, no "interim relief or events have completely and irrevocably erradicated the effects of the alleged violation." County of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631, 99 S.Ct. 1379, 1383, 59 L.Ed.2d 642 (1979). The failure of one seeking an injunction to prove the amount of his damages until after his right to recover damages. Tide-Water Pipe Co. v. Bell, 280 Pa. 104, 124 A. 351 (March 24, 1924).
[4] The constraints and insensibility under which field personnel work are illustrated by the following exchanges which took place during the examination of a superintendent at the Ponce institution.
BY MR. FERNANDEZ:

Q. Sir, in the dormitory you have identified as sumaria or pre-trial Roman Numeral number I, lower level, do you know how much space is available per inmate?
A. I do not know.
Q. Do you know how much space is available for any inmate at any of the dormitories at Ponce, taking any dormitory at Ponce. Do you know that?
A. As I said before, I am not the one who determines the space.
Q. Do you as superintendent of the Ponce District Jail, are there any factors or elements to you as superintendent that are important in order for you to determine how many inmates you might, you may put at a given dormitory, for example?
A. Well, as a reasonable space.
Q. And how, what is a reasonable space to you, how much,
A. I don't know. Maybe it could be a space being enough for two people to pass through at the same time. One person, ten feet of distance. I don't know. It depends.
THE COURT: Sustained. What standard do you apply or are you given any standard to apply to determine the capacity of a given penal institution?
THE WITNESS: Well, the jails, let us say in a modern jail such as the UTI, Bayamón and the State Penitentiary, they have a given capacity, they have a fixed, a certian number of cells. But as regards the Ponce District Jail, I do not know what is its capacity.
BY MR. FERNANDEZ:
Q. You do not know its capacity, is that your answer?
A. Exactly. I don't know what the amount or what the capacity for that jail is.
Q. Let us say that you have a dormitory that has two toilets, two available toilets, how many inmates, do you have any idea as to how many number of maximum number of inmates could you put in there in terms of those sanitary facilities?
A. Ten persons. I don't know.
Q. Sir, before showing you those documents, sir, how many toilets are there in the dormitory, in the dormitories which you have identified as Roman Numeral II, lower level, where the young adults are kept?
A. One toilet.
Q. How many shower stalls are there in there?
A. One faucet. One. I am not sure.
Q. How many wash basins?
A. I don't know if there is any.
Q. May I have it. Sir, I know that upon my questioning you stated that you don't know what the capacity at the Ponce District Jail is. Does this mean that, for example, if tomorrow you get 20 new inmates you just take them in?
A. I have to accept them because it is an order of the court.
Q. How if you get 100 new inmates?

A. I have to accept them.
THE COURT: Isn't it a fact, Mr. Castellar, that based on your nine vast years of experience as a custodian officer, based on your Bachelor of Arts with a concentration in sociology where you studied penal institutions, that neither the Corrections Department nor the Department of Health or anybody have to tell you when a jail is overcrowded or overpopulated and that you know that from your own experience, don't you?
THE WITNESS: Well, it's just that in jails there are areas where a group of inmates is greater than other areas.
THE COURT: So there are areas of the jail that are overpopulated and overcrowded and others are not?
THE WITNESS: It's just that I do not know what the capacity of the jail is to me to be able to tell when a jail is overcrowded or when it isn't.
THE COURT: You have now as of Friday 394 inmates. That is the number. You had 394 inmates as of last Friday, more or less, is that correct?
THE WITNESS: Up till yesterday.
THE COURT: So if all of a sudden you get 600 more prisoners in your jail in Ponce, would you still say that you do not know if your jail is overcrowded or not?
THE WITNESS: Well, they're spaced to house 600 persons more at Ponce.
THE COURT: Where, in the Holiday Inn?
THE WITNESS: No, in the visiting rooms and there is more space there.
(At 35 square feet per inmate Ponce has a total capacity of 236 inmates. By recognized correctional standards that capacity would be reduced to 99 inmates.)
[5] Statutory right to expectancy of being heard by Parole Board: 4 L.P.R.A. §§ 1503 and 1504.
[6] This estimate was provided by the Administrator. (Tr. 3656). There is no reliable information to even estimate the accuracy of this estimate. (See, Tr. 1672, 2449, 2790, 3269).
[7] Although there seems to be a consensus that the duration of treatment should be from six months to one year, at least one therapist disagreed. Some therapists do not differentiate treatment measures to reflect the type or severity of addiction; others do. (Tr. 187, 562, 889, 897, 3260, 3272). There was no treatment at Camp Zarzal, and inmates there must either "waive" their right to treatment or face a transfer to a closed institution. (Tr. 3305-3307, 3397-3404). Inmates who have chosen to stay have been denied parole or have had their parole decision postponed for lack of treatment. (Tr. 3404, 3409-3413). The Industrial School for Women at Vega Alta only had a DSCA unit until 1980 and services were then provided by Hogares CREA, Inc., and Casa Providencia, a religious group.
[8] In using "systemic" or "systematic" we do not mean to suggest that the evils which we set out in this opinion are beyond the control of the individuals who work 0907 at all levels 0907 for the Administration. The defendants and their employees have developed a callousness to suffering and an indifference to slip-shod practices which can only be characterized as intentional indifference to the conditions of life inflicted by them on the plaintiff class. Dr. Rundle noted, as did other experts and as is clearly shown by the videotapes and photographs in evidence, that a sense of duty in one administrator can make a difference. For speaking of conditions at Aguadilla he pointed out that:
[* * *] I should say that just in general the institution at Aguadilla in many ways showed a much more effective housekeeping and organization than any of the other prisons which I visited. It was clear that the superintendent was trying to provide services with very little resources.
He had gotten community people involved. He had a nurse volunteer that came in. He had a community group which donated money to provide medication and the institution, although very old, was for the most part clean

and although it suffered from the same problems with the bathrooms and the toilets not working well and that sort of thing, at least within the physical limits available it was kept clean and didn't present the kind of appearance and smell that the other places did. (Tr. 241; emphasis added).
(And see also Tr. 158-260).
Mr. Sanger Power, an expert retained by the defendants, made the same point:
And I keep saying the only reason for the difference in Sabana Hoyos from a dirty crum[m]y place, is in the quality of the supervision, the extent to which the guy that is running Sabana Hoyos wants to run a neat, clean, decent, orderly operation, or does he want to shut his eyes and the hell with it and just let things go." (Tr. 1916).
[9] This principle was expanded in Dr. Rundle's testimony at Tr. 2809-2811:
Q. Doctor, is there any relationship between providing recreational activities to inmates and their mental health and rehabilitative process?
A. Yes, I believe there is and I think the answer has to do with two major areas.
One, recreational activities can be important in providing a constructive use of time and within the prison system, there is a great deal of time which is spent in idleness, and recreational activities of whatever sort would, I think, be useful in providing an opportunity to use that time.
In addition to that, I believe that it is important to provide an opportunity for some sort of vigorous exercise. The prison population is primarily of young men, I don't know what the figure is in Puerto Rico exactly, but in most prison systems, the average is somewhere around 24 and they tend to be young men who are often focused upon their bodies in a particular way and being in prison I think even increases that focus in this way. The prison society is such that an inmate is called to protect himself and to establish himself within the inmate society, either as someone who can protect himself or who cannot and the consequences of being unable to protect oneself in prison can be very bad in terms of being forced into things which are unwanted, including sexual activities, being subjected to assault, being subjected to the various kinds of controls which other prisoners impose on the weaker prisoners.
So, to have the opportunity to keep their body fit is very important to many of these young men in terms of establishing themselves in a position within the society where they can protect themselves.
In addition to that, vigorous physical exercise is a way of relieving or discharging what we call nervous tension or emotional tension and if that opportunity is not available, then it is going to come out in some other way and I think often, in prisons, where there is not the opportunity for that kind of recreation and activity, it comes out often in hostility or actual physical altercations between inmates or even inmates and staff.
Q. Would it make any difference, doctor, as to whether the type of recreational facilities or programs which is provided is outdoor recreational, indoor recreation.
A. I think it makes a difference, well, indoor recreation can also be of a vigorous sort if there is a facility such as a gymnasium, for example, and I think in that instance the opportunity to discharge tension would be pretty much equal.
Beyond that, I think, however, to have the opportunity to be outdoors is important. I guess it is from the common sense point of view to be able to be out in the sunshine and to see the surrounding landscape is important to all of us but to people locked in a prison it is even specially important, but probably the major difference is that usually outdoor space is large enough so that vigorous activities such as organized sports can be engaged in.
[10] The Supreme Court of Puerto Rico has spoken on the scope of this section only with respect to issues of proportionality of punishment, People v. Pérez, 83 P.R.R. 221, 226 (1961), where it is stated that "With the development of civilization [...] the precept has acquired a new significance and is directed to those `punishments so grossly and inordinately disproportionate to the offense committed as to shock the moral sense of the community.' Hobbs v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, 223 Md. 651, 163 A.2d 331 (1960); People v. Elliot, 272 Ill.

592, 112 N.E. 300 (1916); Weems v. United States, 217 U.S. 349, 30 S.Ct. 544, 54 L.Ed. 793 (1910); [...]." We feel certain, without of course implying any need for such a result, that the Supreme Court of Puerto Rico would find the cruel and unusual language in this section to be at least as protective of individual rights as the same language in the federal Constitution.
[1] The reported opinion is incorrectly dated January 3, 1979.
[2] In view of the fact that 21 institutions are involved in this litigation, the appointment of two Court Monitors and two assistants to the monitors is required. In Ruiz v. Estelle, the Special Master is assisted by five attorneys appointed to serve as monitors and five administrative assistants. In Newman v. Alabama, 559 F.2d 283 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 438 U.S. 915, 98 S.Ct. 3144, 57 L.Ed.2d 1160 (1978), the court of appeals authorized the appointment of a separate monitor for each prison involved in that litigation.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 697 F.Supp. 26 (1987)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
July 23, 1987.
278 *27 *28 Harvey B. Nachman, Harry Anduze, Rafael Pérez-Bachs, José Fernández-Seín, Carlos E. Ramos, Santurce, P.R., Carlos García-Gutiérrez, Nora Rodríguez, Ivonne Díaz de Carrera, Legal Assistance Clinic, University of Puerto Rico School of Law, Rio Piedras, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Marcos Ramírez, Hato Rey, P.R., Dept. of Justice, Com. of Puerto Rico, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
This Court has held that overcrowding is at the center of the many ills which make the conditions of imprisonment in the Commonwealth penal institutions constitutionally unacceptable. Overcrowding inflicts on the plaintiff class subhuman living conditions and is the root for serious deficiencies in other areas of prison life. Fischer v. Winter, 564 F.Supp. 281, 298 (N.D.Cal. 1983).
29 Since September 5, 1980,[1] this Court directed defendants to provide each person in *29 custody of the Administration of Correction (hereinafter the Administration) with a minimum of 35 square feet of living space. This space requirement of 35 square feet was as a temporary measure which was to be eventually increased by the Administration to guarantee 70 square feet to each individually celled inmate and 55 square feet of living space to those housed in dormitories.[2]
In recognition of the urgency to comply with the Order of September 5, 1980, particularly as it pertains to the sleeping and living space for each inmate, the parties entered into a Stipulation on September 8, 1986. At the time of the stipulation a motion by plaintiffs seeking contempt penalties against defendants was pending before the Court. Plaintiffs expressly agreed as part of the stipulation[3] to withdraw said motion in exchange for defendants' undertakings of the stipulation upon the Court's approval of the terms of the stipulation. The Court provisionally approved the stipulation on September 26, 1986, in accordance with the recommendation set forth by the Court Monitors[4] in the First Report of the Court Monitors (Crowding), filed on September 10, 1986. This provisional approval of the stipulation was conditioned upon the appropriate notice to the class and a Rule 23(e) Fed.R.Civ.P. hearing by the Court on the fairness of the stipulation. The hearing was held on December 19, 1986. After said hearing, and having duly considered the terms of the stipulation, the recommendations of counsel and court monitors, as well as the objections raised by the prisoners, this Court approved and adopted as order of the Court the stipulation of September 10, 1986. At said time and through that same order the First Report of the Court Monitors (Crowding) was also confirmed in all respects. Once approved by the Court the parties became bound by the terms of the stipulation and obliged themselves to comply with the deadlines set forth therein in the implementation of its provision.
The approved stipulation requires the reduction of crowding throughout the whole penal system in Puerto Rico immediately.
The stipulation fixes the maximum population for the different institutions under the jurisdiction of the Administration, including inmates assigned to cells and dormitories and excluding those assigned to half-way

houses and provides that each inmate housed in a dormitory shall be provided with no less than 35 square feet of living and sleeping space after December 31, 1986[5] (Article 1).
The stipulation also provides that as of December 1, 1986, only cells containing more than 70 square feet of floor space may be used as double occupancy cells and ennumerates the cells which may be used to house more than one prisoner (Article 2).
The conditions under which open celling may be maintained are also part of the regulatory provisions of the stipulation. Inmates in the open-celled areas must also be provided with the 35 square feet of living and sleeping space (Article 3).
The Administration is also required to provide at least 35 square feet of living and sleeping space to each inmate housed in a dormitory commencing January 1, 1987.
30 In Article 7 the maximum capacity figures of the institutions is fixed at 55 *30 square feet. Article 7 proscribes that after December 31, 1987, any inmate housed in a dormitory be provided with less than 55 square feet of living and sleeping space.
The stipulation establishes for each existing institution the maximum population that can be housed in existing dormitory facilities at 35 square feet per inmate and 55 square feet per inmate and requires in general that any cell containing 70 square feet or less be used to house only one inmate. The most important exception to the latter requirement relates to "open celling" through which two inmates may be assigned to what otherwise would be a single occupancy cell under certain conditions.
The stipulation has three basic deadlines:
1. As of November 30, 1986, the State Penitentiary, including the area known as the Intensive Treatment Unit (UTI), was to house no more than 1151 inmates, all of whom would be confined in cells. The inmates in UTI were to be convicted inmates, and no more than one person could be confined to a cell at UTI. The rest of the State Penitentiary could be converted into "open celling" with double cell occupancy, provided that the inmates who were double celled were pre-trial detainees and also provided that certain enumerated conditions were maintained as to their care and custody.
2. As of December 31, 1986, the Administration was to provide 35 square feet of personal living space while observing certain minimum hygienic standards, and each institution was alloted a maximum number of inmates. As renovated or new living quarters became available, the square feet of personal living space to each confined prisoner or pre-trial detainee was to be raised to 50 feet.
3. As of December 31, 1987, the Administration was compelled to provide 55 square feet of living space to each person entrusted to its custody.
The plaintiffs allege that the Administration has failed to comply with the stipulation ever since it went into effect. Plaintiffs further maintain that defendants are in violation of the agreement and in contempt of the Court's order.
In support of their allegations of noncompliance plaintiffs refer to the Second Report of the Court Monitors, which is the report on defendants' state of compliance with the provisions of the Court's order on crowding, filed with the Court on February 27, 1987. The report is the product of the court appointed monitors on site inspections of the penal institutions throughout Puerto Rico during the period January 26-30, 1987.
During the course of these inspections and in the discharge of their duties the monitors proceeded to ascertain the compliance of the defendants with the capacity limits abscribed to each institution, as well as the extent of defendants' compliance with the Court's order on crowding based on the stipulation entered into by the parties on September 8, 1986, to which terms the parties were obliged to adhere.
The monitors' reports documented "serious instances of noncompliance with the terms of the stipulation" (Report at p. 4). Such problems include "institutional populations in excess of the stipulated capacities, maldistribution of populations within institutions depriving inmates of 35 square feet of living and sleeping space, and the use of unauthorized areas for housing" (Report at p. 4).

The report concludes that despite the depopulation efforts which have been made by defendants, "compliance problems of varying degrees of significance exist at most institutions under the authority of the Correction Administration" (Report at p. 66).
The report further points that some institutions house inmates in excess of the total capacity set forth in the stipulation[6] (Report at p. 66). At the same time, the monitors adverted that several institutions also house inmates in violation of the stipulation because of a problem of maldistribution of inmates among the various housing units (Report at p. 67).
31 *31 Based on the situation of noncompliance, as described by the court monitors thru explicit findings in their reports and on plaintiffs' own knowledge of the violations to the stipulation, plaintiffs have moved the Court for a decree of contempt against defendants and for the imposition of sanctions for said failure. In plaintiffs' view, this is the only remedy available to counter the continuous delays and perpetuation of an unconstitutional system.
On May 27, 1987, the Court held a hearing on the matter. The superintendents of several institutions, to wit: 1) Victor Ruiz Sárraga 0907 Sabana Hoyos; 2) José L. Crespo 0907 Aguadilla; 3) Clemente de Jesús 0907 State Penitentiary; 4) Santos Amaro Félix 0907 Ponce; 5) Efraín Vargas 0907 Vega Alta; were all ordered to appear at the hearing. They were ordered to bring the following: 1) "Libro de Recuentos" (Book of Recounts) from December 31, 1986, to the present; 2) "Informes de Movimientos Diarios" (Daily Movement Reports) from December 31, 1986, to the present; 3) minutes of the treatment and classification committee from December 31, 1986, to the present; 4) the comprehensive, recorded daily institutional count, as well as the recorded daily population diary that divides the population of the institution among the various housing units to which inmates are assigned as ordered by the Court on March 27, 1987, to the present; 5) in case that the preceding were not available, then records, including log books, tally sheets, intake sheets or any other records or documents which show where the inmates, both pre-trial detainees and sentenced prisoners, classified or not classified, were being housed at the institution from December 31, 1986, until present.
The following is a summary of their testimony.
Vega Alta
The testimony of Efraín Vargas, Superintendent at Vega Alta Women's Industrial School, the only female institution in Puerto Rico, was the first one received during the hearing. Mr. Vargas testified that since December 1986 until the present the institution has been housing inmates over the allowed capacity every single day. Superintendent Vargas admitted that he has been aware of the Court's order fixing the maximum capacity but stated that the situation is beyond his control. He stated that all orders he has received for admission have been authorized by a Magistrate. He further stated that the situation has been brought up to the attention of the Administrator of Correction and to the Deputy Administrator,[7] but he has been told that if he does not take those prisoners, he shall be held in contempt.
Mr. Vargas stated that good-faith efforts have been made but that it has been practically impossible to comply with the order of the Court.
Mr. Vargas testified that since June and July of 1986 the population started to grow in an unforeseen way.[8]
The testimony revealed other violations of which the Administration had knowledge. For example, convicted inmates and pre-trial detainees were kept in the hospital and in Room B, and also throughout the institution.
Despite of alleged efforts of compliance, the foregoing violations remained unrebutted during the hearing.
Ponce
Mr. Santos Amaro Félix, Superintendent at the Ponce District Jail, also testified. His testimony evinced that although the stipulated capacity of the institution is 457, more than 457 have been housed there since December

31, 1986, to May 23, 1987. In fact, the population fluctuates between 500 and 572, and on May 11, 1987, it reached 583. 32 The testimony also disclosed other specific *32 violations to the stipulation.[9]
State Penitentiary
The testimony of Clemente de Jesús, who had served as Superintendent for only three weeks, was also received. Mr. de Jesús stated that he was not aware of the stipulation until May 5, 1987.
The evidence presented disclosed manifest violations to the stipulation. Due to overcrowding and security five inmates were kept in a cell which housed only two.
On May 27, 1987, the population of the institution was of 1,365, in clear violation of the stipulation which fixed its maximum capacity at 1151.
There were also violations concerning the capacity at UTI, where thirty inmates in excess of the stipulation were kept therein and double celled also in contravention to the stipulation.
Also at the State Penitentiary the pretrial detainees and sentenced prisoners are kept together.
The previous superintendent at the State Penitentiary, Mr. José L. Jiménez Quiñones, was also called to testify. During his testimony further violations were established.[10]
Aguadilla
Mr. José A. Crespo, who has been Superintendent at Aguadilla since 1976, testified.
The total capacity of this institution is of 128 inmates. On May 25, 1987, there were 148 inmates but 20 were transferred to Guerrero on that day.
The superintendent stated that they had been complying until April, when they were ordered to receive inmates. On May 21, 1987, they received an order from the Administration that they had to move 20 inmates. These twenty were transferred to Guerrero. They will be evaluated and if the medical staff determines that they should not stay there, then they will be returned, thus, creating an excess over the allowed capacity.
Sabana Hoyos
Víctor Ruiz Sárraga, Superintendent at Sabana Hoyos since 1971, also testified. The institution's capacity was fixed at 460 inmates. By May 26, 1987, there were 482.
In this institution the pretrial and sentenced inmates are kept in the same housing unit.
Mr. Ruiz testified that no new facilities have been built to house inmates since 1980. With the testimony of Mr. Víctor Ruiz Sárraga plaintiffs rested their case.
The situation which prevails in the system, as had been described by the court monitors in their report, was substantiated by the testimonies of the superintendents elicited during the hearing.
The Court further finds that the report rendered by the court monitors also presents additional cases of violation to the stipulation. The report discloses that particular individual housing units as opposed to institutions are overpopulated. Among these housing units are the Admission cellblock at Vega Alta (Report, p. 6); several dormitories at Bayamón (Report, p. 12); several dormitories at Guayama (Report p. 22); illegal use of cells at Stop 8 (Report p. 50); certain dormitories at Miramar (Report p. 52); several dormitories at Humacao (Report p. 53); two dormitories at Arecibo (Report p. 60). No evidence was offered by defendants to rebut these findings of open violations to the stipulation.

Moreover, in subsequent filings[11] plaintiffs have submitted further uncontested facts. On July 3, 1987, the State Penitentiary had 424 prisoners in excess of the maximum capacity. Ponce was 35% in excess of capacity. The 33 women's institution *33 at Vega Alta had, in excess, 36 inmates. Aguadilla was over the rated capacity by 13 inmates, and Arecibo, Sabana Hoyos, Guavate, Limón and La Pica were all in excess of 90% capacity. The situation did not improve and by July 10, 1987, the State Penitentiary had 418 more inmates than it is supposed to have at 35 square feet. The annex UTI housed 55 pre-trial detainees, 62 minimum classification prisoners, 25 unclassified prisoners and 233 medium classified prisoners. This situation reveals that there are 69 maximum classified prisoners out of the 444 in a maximum security prison.
Ponce had 32 inmates above the limit, Vega Alta had 43 in excess, Aguadilla had 4 above the limit, and Sabana Hoyos 16 in excess. The reported facts disclose that at Guayama there were three dormitories over the limit. In Ponce some dormitories are 50% overcrowded and some nearly 100%. Two dormitories at Aguadilla are at 200%. At Vega Alta the "hospitalillo" area is 263% above capacity.
The testimony of Dr. Mercedes Otero de Ramos, the Administrator of Correction, was received during the hearing.
She declared that she proposed and had made a commitment to comply with the terms of the stipulation once it was signed. She was authorized to sign it by the Governor of Puerto Rico.
She admitted the reality of overcrowding in the penal institutions in Puerto Rico. As had been previously raised by written motions, Dr. Otero de Ramos alleged an unforeseen population increase[12] as the cause which has made strict compliance impossible.
Defendants have also maintained that they are under substantial compliance. They aver that the vast majority of penal institutions are in compliance with the September 1986 stipulation.
In view of the evidence before us the Court reaches the following
Findings of Fact
1. Defendants have failed to comply with the terms of the stipulation of September 8, 1986.
2. The constitutional rights of plaintiff class guaranteed to them by the Fifth, Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States have been violated and continue to be violated as a consequence of noncompliance with the terms of the stipulation of September 1986.
3. One of the causes for deterioration of the compliance at the State Penitentiary was the lack of administration capabilities on the part of the superintendent of that institution. This inefficiency resulted in delayed classification of prisoners and delays in transfers of classified prisoners from the State Penitentiary to other institutions.
4. On March 6, 1987, the Administration entered into a contract with the Federal Bureau of Prisons and the United States Marshal's Office permitting the transfer of up to 150 prisoners, including 15 female prisoners, to Bureau of Prisons facilities. [Defendants' Second Motion in Compliance with Specific Provision of Court Order.] As of May 28, 1987, only three transfers had been effected pursuant to this agreement.
5. Although the Administrator of Corrections assumed that the growth in prison population would be 9.1% annually when she approved the Crowding Stipulation, the stipulation is not conditioned upon that or any other rate of increase. No efforts were made to apprise the Court of any increase beyond 9.1% when it became apparent that the increase was greater.
6. Alternatives to incarceration for some classes of convicted and pre-trial prisoners are necessary in order for defendants to achieve compliance with the Court's order on crowding. These alternatives include more halfway houses.

34 7. The defendant Governor of Puerto Rico has been made fully aware of problems *34 relating to crowding in penal institutions as those problems have occurred and persisted. The Crowding Stipulation, which was the basis of the Court's order, was approved by the Governor and the Secretary of Justice of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
8. By and large, the only efforts that have been made to achieve compliance with the Court's order on crowding have involved the construction of new housing units for prisoners. No coordinated efforts have been made by the Commonwealth to control the flow of prisoners into or out of existing facilities.
Conclusions of Law
In the instant case the Governor, the Administrator of Correction and the individual members of the Parole Board have failed to comply with the Court's orders stemming from the stipulation entered into by the parties and subsequently approved by the Court. The disregard of judicial authority constitutes a contempt of court. The United States district courts have the inherent authority and duty to protect and effectuate their judgments and to punish disobedience of or resistance to their lawful orders and decrees. Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401, 3 L.Ed.2d 5, 3 L.Ed.2d 19 (1958).
The power of courts to punish for contempt is a necessary and integral part of the independence of the judiciary, and it is absolutely essential to the performance of the duties imposed on them by law. Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 450, 31 S.Ct. 492, 501, 55 L.Ed. 797 (1911). The basic proposition in contempt proceedings is that all orders and judgments of courts must be complied with promptly, Maness v. Meyers, 419 U.S. 449, 95 S.Ct. 584, 42 L.Ed.2d 574 (1975).
Contempt of a federal court consists in 1) misbehavior by any person in the court's presence or so near thereto as to obstruct the administration of justice; or 2) misbehavior of any of its officers in their official transaction; or 3) disobedience or resistance to a court's lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree or command. 18 U.S.C. § 401. An act or omission in violation of an order of a court may subject a party either to criminal or civil contempt, or both United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 67 S.Ct. 677, 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947).
Contempt proceedings can be either civil or criminal in nature. The characterization of a proceeding as civil or criminal depends primarily upon the purpose for which a contempt finding is sought and issued. Gompers v. Buck Stove & Range Co., supra, 221 U.S. 418, 31 S.Ct. 492, 55 L.Ed. 797; Shillitani v. United States, 384 U.S. 364, 369, 86 S.Ct. 1531, 1534-1535, 16 L.Ed.2d 622 (1966). Civil contempt is remedial in nature and generally designed either to coerce compliance with a court order or to compensate the plaintiff for any losses sustained. [13]See, United States v. United Mine Workers of America, supra, 330 U.S. at 303-304, 67 S.Ct. at 701.
There is no right to trial by jury in a civil contempt proceeding.[14]Shillitani v. United States, supra, 384 U.S. 364, 86 S.Ct. 1531, 16 L.Ed.2d 622.
The proof of the defendant's violations in a civil contempt proceeding must be clear and convincing.[15]United States v. Rizzo, 539 F.2d 458, 465 (5th Cir.1976).
35 *35 Although willfulness is a necessary element of criminal contempt, it is not of civil contempt. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 69 S.Ct. 497, 93 L.Ed. 599 (1949). Furthermore, the absence of willfulness does not relieve a party from civil contempt. Civil, as distinguished from criminal contempt is a sanction to enforce compliance with an order of the court or to compensate for losses for damages sustained by reason of noncompliance. Since the purpose is remedial, it matters not with what intent the defendant did the prohibited act. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., supra, 336 U.S. at 191, 69 S.Ct. at 499.
In the instant case defendants have continously alleged their impossibility to comply due to unforeseen circumstances. They maintain that there has been substantial compliance. It is clear that impossibility or inability to comply with the judicial decree is a valid defense to civil contempt charges. United States v. Bryan, 339 U.S. 323, 330-334, 70 S.Ct. 724, 730-732, 94 L.Ed. 884 (1950).

However, the burden of establishing impossibility or inability to comply as a defense to civil contempt is on the party raising the defense. The party petitioning for an adjudication of civil contempt does not have the burden of showing that the respondent has the capacity to comply. United States v. Rylander, 460 U.S. 752, 103 S.Ct. 1548, 75 L.Ed.2d 521 (1983); United States v. Fleischman, 339 U.S. 349, 362-63, 70 S.Ct. 739, 746, 94 L.Ed. 906 (1950); NLRB v. Trans Ocean Export Packing, Inc., 473 F.2d 612, 616 (9th Cir. 1973).
It is established that a party against whom civil contempt sanctions are sought is not held to absolute compliance with the Court's order. If a party has taken all reasonable steps within its power to insure compliance with the orders, that party ought not be held in contempt. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Amalgamated Transit Union, 531 F.2d 617, 626 (D.C.Cir.1976); Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 406 (9th Cir.1976), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 931, 97 S.Ct. 1550, 51 L.Ed.2d 774. However, if inability to comply is to serve as a valid defense to civil contempt, it must be demonstrated clearly and categorically. Powell v. Ward, 487 F.Supp. 917, 933 (S.D. N.Y.1980), aff'd as modified, 643 F.2d 924 (2nd Cir.1981).
The extent of the efforts needed to comply will vary with the circumstances. In re Westinghouse Elec. Corp. Uranium Contracts Litigation, 563 F.2d 992, 997 (10th Cir.1977).
In the instant case in spite of defendants' allegations, they have not clearly demonstrated their impossibility to comply. Defendants' arguments are unpersuasive. They represent more of what this Court has heard for years and which is evinced by the history of this lengthy and troublesome litigation. It has been held that defendants violate their obligations under a federal court order and, therefore, are subject to civil contempt sanctions if the order is violated by failures of diligence, effective control and steadfast purpose to effectuate the goals prescribed in the order. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. Train, 510 F.2d 692, 713 (D.C.Cir.1975); Aspira of New York v. Board of Education of City of New York, 423 F.Supp. 647, 654 (S.D.N. Y.1976).
Assertions of the good faith efforts to comply with the order are irrelevant. Intent is not an issue in civil contempt proceedings. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co., 336 U.S. 187, 69 S.Ct. 497, 93 L.Ed. 599 (1949). Defendants have failed to comply with the district court's order, McComb, supra, at 191, 69 S.Ct. at 499, and they have also failed to present a valid defense for their non-compliance. Budgetary limitations or inadequate resources can never be a valid justification for constitutional violations. Lareau v. Manson, 651 F.2d 96, 104 (2nd Cir.1981); Ahren v. Thomas, 434 F.Supp. 873, 898 (W.D.Mo.1977).
Such is the situation before us. Furthermore, the fact that efforts and improvement have been made leading to an 36 *36 increased degree of compliance does not protect a party from contempt where it has not established that
further improvements would be impossible. Fortin v. Commissioner of Mass. Department of Public Welfare, 692 F.2d 790, 797 (1st Cir.1982). Defendants' burden is a heavy one. Combs v. Ryan's Coal Co., Inc., 785 F.2d 970, 984 (11th Cir.1986).
In this respect, no particular percentage of compliance can be used to define the substantiality of a party's compliance. Substantiality depends on the circumstances of each case, including the nature of the interest at stake and the degree to which noncompliance affects that interest. Fortin v. Commissioner, supra, 692 F.2d 790, 795 (1st Cir.1982) (94% compliance does not constitute substantial compliance where underlying rights vindicated by order are important).
Although diligence is relevant to the question of the ability to comply, evidence of diligence alone does not satisfy the burden on a party defending itself against contempt. The fact that efforts and improvements have been made does not prove that further improvement would be impossible. Indeed, the test of impossibility is particularly strict in cases in which the needs of the persons protected by the court's order are urgent. Fortin v. Commissioner, supra, at 796-797.
The fact that a party did not foresee the difficulty of compliance does not constitute a defense to civil contempt unless that party can establish that it took all reasonable measures to exercise diligence, effective control and steadfast purpose to effectuate the prescribed goals. Aspira of New York v. Board of Education City of New York, supra, at 651.

This Court applauds whatever advances have been achieved by the Administration. However, we cannot condone any further the perpetration of constitutional violation in open disregard to the Court's order and to defendants' own compromise to comply. The situation has continued for too long. The waiting time is over.
In view of the foregoing the Court finds that defendants the Governor of Puerto Rico, the Administrator of Correction and the members of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico have failed to comply with the orders of the Court and finds them in contempt.
The sanction imposed after a finding of civil contempt serves two functions: to coerce future compliance and to remedy past noncompliance. United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 302-04, 67 S.Ct. 677, 700-701, 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947).
In choosing sanctions designed to coerce future compliance, the district judge sitting in equity is vested with wide discretion in fashioning a remedy. Vuitton et Fils S.A. v. Carousel Handbags, 592 F.2d 126, 130 (2nd Cir.1979).
In assessing the appropriate character of a remedy, the district court must consider the character and magnitude of the harm threatened and the probable effectiveness of any suggested sanction in bringing about the result desired. United States v. United Mine Workers, supra, 330 U.S. at 304, 67 S.Ct. at 701.
WHEREFORE, for their past noncompliance with the stipulation and the orders of this Court, it is hereby
ORDERED that the Governor, the Administrator of Correction and the members of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico shall pay as sanctions the amount of $50,000.00 for violations to the Court's orders.
The Court FURTHER ORDERS that a daily fine of $10.00 per inmate shall be paid whenever an inmate is held living in an institution where the maximum capacity has been exceeded. The same fine shall be paid whenever a prisoner is held living in a cell, dormitory or any other particular housing unit within an institution in conditions which contravene the terms of the stipulation concerning the required living space.
37 In the discharge of their functions, the monitors shall report to the Court on a *37 weekly basis the extent of noncompliance for the purpose of computing any fines.
Any future fines imposed and based on the formula set above shall be paid at the Clerk's Office of this Court before 3:00 P.M. the Friday following the computation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] On September 5, 1980, this Court, after a hearing on a motion for emergency relief, found the penal system of Puerto Rico unconstitutional. The Opinion and Order, which granted relief to plaintiffs in several areas, directed that the goal of 35 square feet per inmate was to be achieved in stages within six (6) months from the date of the order. Feliciano v. Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14, 41 (1980).
[2] Such plans were to be provided within 90 days of the entry of the order.
[3] Thru article 10: Scope of Agreement and Withdrawal of Plaintiffs' Motion Seeking Contempt Penalties, the parties addressed said terms of the stipulation.
[4] On March 20, 1986, the Court entered a finding of continued unconstitutionality concerning the conditions of the penal institutions in Puerto Rico. Thru order entered on same date the Court appointed two monitors under Rule 53, Fed.R.Civ.P. The monitors were appointed to make current assessment with the state of defendants' compliance with the September 5, 1980, order to report on conditions and to prepare remedial orders directed to bring about constitutional conditions throughout the correctional system.
[5] With the exception of all cells at Stop 8.
[6] This is especially evident in the State Penitentiary and in Vega Alta.

[7] A staff meeting with the Deputy Administrator in Charge of Penal Institutions, Dr. Miguel Poupart, within the presence of the Administrator and other superintendents, was held where the manner to loosen overcrowding was discussed.
[8] An example is that the pretrial detainees which had been in the high 40's had gone up to 95. (See Monitors' Report at p. 9).
[9] There were inmates at Ponce sleeping on the floor; two or three dormitories were having problems with overcrowding.
[10] There was absence of bed frames (just mattresses) and sheets at the B-2 cells and modules. There were mattresses on the floors, and during a visit in January mattresses were missing in some cells.
[11] See, Supplemental Motion in support of the imposition of contempt penalties, filed on July 13, 1987, and Further Report on Population, filed on July 14, 1987.
[12] However, although the estimated projections of population increase were 9.1%, defendants were aware by December 31, 1986, that there had been an increase of 17% and no motion was filed.
[13] On the other hand, criminal contempt is designed to vindicate the Court's authority, and the relief in criminal contempt is punitive in the manner of any other criminal sentence. Gompers v. Buck Stove & Range Co., supra, 221 U.S. at 444, 31 S.Ct. at 499; G & C Merriam Co. v. Webster Dictionary Co., 639 F.2d 29, 40 (1st Cir.1980).
[14] On the contrary, in criminal contempt proceedings, defendants are entitled to trial by jury, except for "petty offenses", which are those resulting in imprisonment of not more than six months or a fine of not more than $500.00. Bloom v. Illinois, 391 U.S. 194, 88 S.Ct. 1477, 20 L.Ed.2d 522 (1968).
[15] However, in a criminal contempt proceeding the violation of the order must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. Michaelson v. United States, 266 U.S. 42, 45 S.Ct. 18, 69 L.Ed. 162 (1924).
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 754 F.Supp. 942 (1991)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
January 10, 1991.
Nachman & Fernandez Sein, Santurce, P.R., McConnell, Valdes, San Juan, P.R., Carlos Ramos Gonzalez, Santurce, P.R., Jose A. Fernandez Paoli, Miramar, Santurce, P.R., Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Gonzalez Badillo & Davila, Harry Anduze, Pia Gallegos, Hato Rey, P.R., Jeffrey Williams, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiffs.
943 *943 Ramirez & Ramirez, Hato Rey, P.R., Pedro Del Valle, Federal Lit. Div., Dept. of Justice, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MODIFICATION AND IMPOSING SANCTIONS FOR CONTEMPT
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
I. Introduction
Once again the Court is called upon to consider a request by defendants to modify a stipulation entered into on September 8, 1986, and approved by the Court on January 26, 1987. This order is based upon testimony and documentary evidence submitted during hearings commenced on October 22, 1990. These hearings constituted a continuation of hearings commenced on May 3, 1990, which resulted in an Opinion and Order, entered on June 7, 1990, denying defendants' motion to modify the stipulation and postponing consideration of plaintiffs' June 9, 1989, motion seeking imposition of contempt sanctions. At the conclusion of its June 7 order, the Court directed defendants to file a comprehensive compliance plan, the identity of which was first disclosed during the May hearings, ordered the parties to enter into good faith negotiations regarding the adequacy of that plan, and set additional hearings to begin on October 1, 1990, in the event that the parties could not agree upon the terms of the comprehensive plan.[1]
Defendants' compliance plan was to have been filed on July 7, 1990. On July 9, however, defendants sought an extension until August 7. Plaintiffs objected and defendants were ordered to file their plan no later than July 20. Defendants complied with this order.
Negotiations over the plan quickly broke down when defendants refused plaintiffs' request that "someone with direct access to the Governor and with the authority to bind him to agreement reached during negotiations" participate in any negotiations and that the Governor agree in advance to be a signatory to a final agreement if such an agreement were to be reached.[2] Defendants then requested that the plan be referred to the Court Monitor for review, to be followed by recommendations to the Court. Following a status conference held on September 14, 1990, the Court entered its September 19, 1990, order in which it found that plaintiffs' requests were reasonable conditions to meaningful negotiation. The Court specifically found that "plaintiffs have fulfilled their obligations under the June 7 order to enter into good faith negotiations regarding the plan."[3] Hearings were scheduled to commence on plaintiffs' contempt motion on October 22, 1990, at which time defendants were invited to introduce additional evidence in support of their motion to defer compliance with the 55 square foot standard until June 1991.

On October 4, 1990, defendants filed their Motion Seeking Modification of Stipulation Regarding the 55 Sq. Ft. Standard Due to Emergency Temporary Housing Project. Although scant on details, defendants' pleading concludes as follows:
To summarize, defendants seek a modification of the stipulation regarding the 55 sq. ft. standard in order to defer compliance on the basis of an Emergency Temporary Housing Project intended to meet the 55 sq. ft. standard system-wide.
On the same date, plaintiffs renewed their motion for civil contempt, seeking fines for past violations of the 55 square foot standard at $125 per prisoner per day as well as fines of $125 per prisoner per day for future 944 violations of that standard. Plaintiffs ask that fines for past violations be *944 placed in a special fund to be used to alleviate the institutional effects of overcrowding (e.g., recreational facilities, equipment, and staff) and that any monies remaining in this fund when defendants achieve compliance be returned to them as an incentive for speedy compliance.
Hearings commenced on October 22, 1990. The first day of these hearings, however, was devoted to a motion for a temporary restraining order filed by plaintiffs on the morning of that day. Plaintiffs' motion alleged egregious conditions at Bayamón 1072, an institution used partially for housing pre-trial detainees. Among plaintiffs' allegations were extreme overcrowding and maldistribution of prisoners in various housing units,[4] the housing of prisoners in desperate need of medical or psychiatric attention that was not being provided, the near total absence of water, insufficient food, and the absence of sheets, clothing, eating utensils, and personal hygiene supplies.[5] At approximately 10:30 a.m., the Court conducted a tour of buildings 3, 5, and 7 of the facility in the company of counsel, representatives of the Administration of Correction (hereinafter referred to as the "AOC") and the Department of Health, and others.
The tour disclosed that conditions at Bayamón 1072 were at least as bad as those described in the affidavit of plaintiffs' expert, Steve Martin, a copy of which affidavit was attached to plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order. Prisoners on the second floor were found to be completely without water. Functioning toilets, showers, and lavatories were non-existent. On some occasions, some prisoners miss at least one daily meal, and prisoners who receive food are required to eat with makeshift eating utensils or with their hands. Prisoners were found sleeping on floors, both in dormitories and in shower areas, without mattresses, sheets, or pillows. The Court observed apparently seriously mentally ill inmates and later reviewed the mental health records of eight of these prisoners. That review confirmed the Court's impression. All classes of prisoners, sentenced, pretrial, youth, and adult were mixed in dormitories. Plaintiffs' allegations regarding crowding and extreme maldistribution of prisoners among housing units were confirmed.
Most troubling to the Court was the fact that many of the most egregious conditions observed during the tour of Bayamón 1072 existed as of December 1989 and were described in the 96th Report of the Court Monitor, filed on January 10, 1990. The superintendent of the institution testified that conditions essentially were unchanged since September 4, 1990, when he assumed his position there. He acknowledged that the water "problem" predated his arrival.
At one point during the hearing, the following exchange took place between the Court and Mr. Charles Montgomery, the Deputy Director for Operations of the AOC:
Q. One last question, Sir, coming back to what this hearing is all about, you saw Bayamón today, and you read a report in January 1st that there were those problems there, and that those problems had existed for ten months, is that a true statement?
A. That's true.
Q. And according to your statement just previous, rather than overcrowding you would look at other 0907 that the situation at Bayamón presents other more serious problems concerning the imminent harm to inmates' health and safety?
A. That's correct.

Q. So, in your understanding of the situation at Bayamón 1072, rather than the overcrowding

problem there, the problem of the psychotics there, lack of cleanliness, the health problem created

by lack of water, by odors, toilets being without water, and all the human feces in there, those are

945

much more serious problems *945 that need emergency attention right now?

A. That's correct.

Q. So, you won't be surprised if I acted in that fashion with this request.

A. I would hope that you would.

At the conclusion of the hearing, the Court issued a bench order granting plaintiffs a temporary injunction which, inter alia, halted all admissions to Bayamón 1072 until the population at that facility had been reduced to the maximum capacity at 55 square feet and until running water was available in all areas of the institution to permit toilets, lavatories, and showers to function properly and to provide drinking water to all prisoners. A written order to this effect was entered on October 23, 1990.[6]

Although conditions at Bayamón 1072 are not the issue directly before the Court at this time, the conditions found to exist at that institution provide a context in which to assess defendants' pending motion to modify and plaintiffs' motion for imposition of contempt sanctions. Although witnesses testified, and the Court fervently hopes, that conditions at Bayamón 1072 are not reflective of those at all AOC institutions at this time, the conditions observed at Bayamón 1072 indicate at the least that the Court is addressing at this time more than an isolated problem of crowding. To the contrary, crowding continues to exacerbate dreadfully inadequate environmental conditions, absence of medical and psychiatric health care, impermissible mingling of sentenced and unsentenced prisoners, as well as impermissible mingling of adult and youthful offenders, grossly inadequate security, and numerous other problems 0907 all of which, in combination, continue to deprive prisoners in AOC facilities of their minimal constitutional rights.

Hearings on defendants' motion to modify and plaintiffs' motion for contempt sanctions were held on October 23-24. After a recess, the continued testimony of the Administrator of Correction was completed on November 1, 1990. Defendants began by introducing evidence in support of their motion for modification; plaintiffs then presented evidence in support of their motion for contempt sanctions.

II. Findings of Fact Concerning Defendants' Motion to Modify

At the outset, it is noteworthy that defendants have abandoned their comprehensive compliance plan as a basis for modification. Although that plan was filed pursuant to the Court's June 7, 1990, order, it was not introduced into evidence during the course of the October hearings. Defendants offered no testimony that implementation of the plan would correct the wide range of constitutional deficiencies throughout the AOC, nor did they claim that it supports modification.
Moreover, defendants introduced no evidence of changed circumstances, in law or in fact, that would support modification of an injunctive order. They rely exclusively on their stated intention to implement an "emergency temporary housing project" by June 30, 1991, and they seek delay in enforcement of the 1986 stipulation until that project has been completed.
Defendants apparently have concluded that the only viable alternative to reduce overcrowding in Puerto Rico's penal system is the construction of new spaces (Tr. II. 10, 15). This is true in spite of compelling testimony by Mr. Steve Martin, plaintiffs' corrections expert, that no penal system that has fallen behind the building curve has been able to eliminate crowding by construction alone (Tr. III. 119) and that other viable options exist to address this problem (Tr. III. 137-38). Defendants are entitled to opt for new construction, however, and it is on this basis that they offer their emergency temporary housing plan.
The plan involves the construction of 1,000 dormitory spaces for minimum custody prisoners, consisting of 400 beds at Sabana Hoyos, 200 beds at Punta Lima, and 400 beds at Zarzal (Tr. II. 85, 105-06). The buildings will be

946 constructed of concrete floors, concrete block walls, and roofs of steel (Tr. II. 84). They are designed to *946 have detached hygiene facilities (likened by the Director of the Public Buildings Authority to "modern day outhouses") and are expected to have a life expectancy of 10 years (Tr. II. 104-05). The units are expected to be available by June 30, 1991 (Tr. IV. 7).
Mr. Rafael Arias, the Director of Puerto Rico's Public Buildings Authority, was first informed on September 25, 1990, of the need to complete this construction by June 30, 1991. Prior to September 25, he had never heard the topic mentioned (Tr. II. 87, 90-91). When asked by the Court whether the emergency temporary housing could have been commenced two years ago, this witness responded, "Yes, your Honor, but it was not done that way" (Tr. II. 115). Dr. Mercedes Otero de Ramos, the Administrator of Correction, testified that she first raised the emergency temporary housing project with the Governor's Criminal Justice Task Force on September 25, 1990 (Tr. II. 142). Written confirmation of financing for the plan was received by Dr. Otero on October 24, 1990 (during the recess in the hearing) (Tr. IV. 4, Plaintiffs' Ex. 5), although no specific amount of money has been approved or allocated (Tr. IV. 5).
This testimony convinces the Court that the emergency temporary housing plan is nothing more than a last minute effort by defendants, reflecting the exigencies of litigation. Mr. Arias, an architect by profession, has served as the Director of the Public Buildings Authority since 1985 (Tr. II. 74-75). During that time he has been responsible for construction of 21 penal projects with a total value of $230,744.852 (Tr. II. 76). His testimony, which the Court fully credits, establishes explicitly that defendants could have taken steps to comply with the January 26, 1987, order in 1988, following the Court's approval of a one-year delay in achieving the 55 square foot standard, and in 1989 and 1990, while the Court stayed its hand on plaintiffs' June 9, 1989, motion for contempt sanctions.
According to Dr. Otero, the projected capacity of the system in June of 1991 will be approximately 10,962, including the 1,000 beds contemplated by the emergency temporary housing plan (Tr. II. 138-39). Current capacity is 9,138 (Tr. II. 137). As of October 15, 1990, the total population of the AOC was 9,873 (Defendants' Ex. I).
Projections for the actual population to be housed in June 1991 are in conflict. Projections prepared in April 1989 by the Office of Planning of the AOC predict a total population of 11,354 by June 1991 (Defendants' Ex. L).[7] Projections prepared by the Administrator of Correction and filed on October 1, 1990, predict a total population of only 10,262 in January 1992. These same projections reflect a total population of 9,688 in January 1991 (Plaintiffs' Ex. 3) although, as been noted, the actual population on October 15, 1990, already exceeded the 947 January 1991 projection.[8]*947 Yet, a third projection was offered by Dr. Otero, who testified that the population will be 10,703 in June of 1991 (Tr. II. 130-31) although the source of that projection is not clear.[9]
In view of this evidence, the Court is not sanguine that construction of the contemplated emergency temporary housing will be sufficient to permit compliance with the 1986 stipulation. Given the near certainty that defendants' capacity will not exceed that projected by Dr. Otero, and the conflicting evidence of population projections by the AOC for June 1991, the Court cannot find that defendants' emergency temporary housing plan, even if successfully implemented, will result in compliance with the 55 square foot requirement of the 1986 stipulation.
The Court heard substantial evidence indicating that the emergency temporary housing project is likely to be a failed venture. Sites for the proposed beds were selected by the Criminal Justice Task Force on the exclusive criterion of the availability of land (Tr. II. 80). The project is opposed by the AOC's Deputy Director of Operations, who questioned the adequacy of electricity, security staff, and the ability of the AOC to identify the proper number of minimum custody inmates to assign to the temporary beds (Tr. I. 168-69). Mr. Montgomery specifically questioned the sites selected for the temporary beds:
... I specifically questioned Zarzal, I specifically questioned Punta Lima because of existing problems that I was aware that existed there at the time, such as the water tower on the hill side at Sabana Hoyos, but the only reason I've seen in getting the visibility that it was getting was to prevent being fined, being boxed, that's my opinion, I mean I am not speaking for the Administration of Corrections.

(Tr. I. 170) Although it appears that certain improvements will be made to the infra-structure of the existing institutions where emergency housing will be constructed (Tr. II. 85-87), the Court seriously questions whether defendants have given sufficient weight to their own findings regarding the serious environmental inadequacies they themselves have found at these institutions (Plaintiffs' Ex. 4, Tr. IV. 10).[10]

Plaintiffs' correctional expert expressed his strong belief that the emergency temporary housing plan is "ill-fated," even expressing doubt that the physical construction itself could be completed successfully (Tr. III. 109-10). He expressed serious concern about the "very tenuous infra-structure" and severe environmental deficiencies he had observed at these institutions, and he noted that in some instances these institutions "do not even meet the minimum human habitation requirements" (Tr. III. 118-19). Mr. Martin also noted that, in his opinion, the AOC does not have the managerial capacity or the staff to implement or to run the emergency temporary housing project (Tr. III. 134). His opinion of defendants' plan was summarized in the following testimony:

... we saw last Saturday that it's a busted broke system, that there is not more serious harm, and

948

there may be *948 that we have not detected, is amazing to me.

To suggest that over a time span of four weeks, three weeks, that you can commit yourself to building a thousand units, in seven months, to eliminate the problems that I have seen and read about, is probably one of the most astoundingly crazy suggestions that I have come across in my professional career, it is just a prescription to failure.

(Tr. III. 126).

III. Conclusions of Law Concerning Defendants' Motion to Modify

This being its third opportunity to address a request by defendants to modify the September 1986 stipulation, the Court need not repeat its earlier conclusions regarding the law controlling modification of a stipulated injunctive decree. The Court specifically incorporates the analysis set forth in Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 672 F.Supp. 627 (D.P.R.1987). The Court also addressed this legal issue in its June 7, 1990, Opinion and Order denying modification of the 55 square foot standard, and the reasoning set forth in that opinion also is incorporated herein.
The findings of the Court make it clear that defendants have not borne their burden to establish entitlement to modification by demonstrating that, by virtue of changed circumstances, the decree will not accomplish its underlying objective of ameliorating unconstitutional conditions throughout the AOC. To the contrary, further delay in the provision of minimally adequate living and sleeping space to all AOC prisoners will detract from the achievement of that objective. Defendants have failed to make a case for modification by any standard, including the "flexible" standard announced by New York State Association v. Carey (Willowbrook), 706 F.2d 956 (2nd Cir.1983). See Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. Kearney, 734 F.Supp. 561 (D.Mass.1990).
In summary, in September 1986, defendants agreed to provide each prisoner in the AOC with at least 55 square feet of living and sleeping space no later than January 1, 1988.[11] When defendants first sought a delay in implementation of this agreement, the Court extended the deadline to January 1, 1989. Faced with a second motion to modify in December 1988 and plaintiffs' subsequent motion for contempt sanctions, the Court delayed setting this matter for hearing for almost two years hoping that defendants would take steps to effectuate their promise without additional coercive action on the part of the Court. Instead, defendants have permitted the situation to deteriorate to the extent that even the 35 square foot standard is not being met at some institutions today. They premised their third motion to modify on a then-unwritten "comprehensive compliance plan," which they later abandoned in favor of their "emergency temporary housing plan" first conceived on September 25, 1900, less than one month prior to the commencement of hearings on this matter. The Court can only conclude that defendants' grounds for modification not only are legally insufficient, but that they also are grounded in bad faith. United States v. Oregon State Medical Society, 343 U.S. 326, 333, 72 S.Ct. 690, 695, 96 L.Ed. 978 (1952) ("It is the duty of the courts to beware of efforts to defeat injunctive relief by protestations of repentance and

reform, especially when abandonment seems timed to anticipate suit, and there is probability of resumption."); Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513, 1521 (11th Cir.1984).
Defendants are entitled to implement any "comprehensive compliance plan" they wish, so long as that plan comports with existing orders in this case. Moreover, whatever doubts the Court may have regarding the efficacy of the emergency temporary housing plan, defendants are entitled to implement that plan. They have made no 949 showing, however, that modification in the form of further delay is warranted, *949 and their motion to modify will be denied.
IV. Findings of Fact Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Contempt Sanctions
Without question, plaintiffs have proved noncompliance with the 55 square foot provision on the September 1986 stipulation by clear and convincing (indeed, uncontroverted) evidence. The first report of the Court Monitor setting forth violations of the 55 square foot standard reflected 10,305 prisoners housed in violation of that standard during the 14-day period covered by that report. See 92nd Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Seventy-Fifth Report Pursuant to the Court's Order of July 23, 1987, submitted on December 5, 1989.[12] The most recent report of the Court Monitor admitted into evidence at the hearing reflects a total of 13,247 prisoners housed in excess of institutional and housing unit capacities at 55 square feet of sleeping and living space per prisoner for the 14-day period covered by that report. See 140th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 103rd Report Pursuant to the Court's Order of July 23, 1987, filed on October 22, 1990. At no time during the interval between these reports were defendants remotely close to compliance with the terms of the stipulation.
Although defendants have urged that construction of additional facilities is the only viable alternative to unconstitutional crowding, they have offered no credible evidence that a building program could not have begun earlier to achieve compliance with the 1986 stipulation. To the contrary, as has been noted earlier in this opinion and order, the Director of the Public Buildings Authority since 1985, who has supervised more than $230,000,000 worth of penal construction projects, testified that defendants' "emergency" building program could have begun two years ago (Tr. II. 75-76, 115). Moreover, as has been pointed out, defendants cannot claim unforeseeable population increases that made compliance impossible or even impracticable.[13] Finally, defendants failed to refute that other means were at hand to accomplish the constitutional objective of the 1986 stipulation, e.g., expansion of the Expedited Bail Project (Tr. III. 123, 137-38), increased efficiency and funding of the parole board (Tr. III. 125), increased use of the clemency program, half-way houses, and electric monitoring, and use of any reporting centers (Tr. III. 138).[14]
V. Conclusions of Law Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Contempt Sanctions
Again, the Court will incorporate by reference its detailed discussion of the law governing contempt in earlier opinions and orders. See Order of July 23, 1987, (holding defendants in contempt for failure to provide 35 square feet of living and sleeping space to each prisoner); Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 697 F.Supp. 37 950 (D.P.R., aff'd sub nom. Morales Feliciano *950 v. Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 887 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1989) (increasing fines for noncompliance).
As has been pointed out in the findings of fact set forth above, the number of prisoners suffering harm as a result of defendants' inaction is substantial and at least as large as the percentage cited by the Court of Appeals in its affirmance of this Court's earlier order. Morales Feliciano v. Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 887 F.2d at 5. Likewise, the period of noncompliance has been as long as that preceding the increase in fines approved by the Court of Appeals in connection with defendants' noncompliance with the 35 square foot requirement of the same stipulation. Id. Moreover, the Court believes there is ample evidence to refute any claim of "good faith" on the part of defendants even if that element constituted a sufficient legal excuse for failing to comply. Fortin v. Commissioner of Mass. Dep't of Pub. Welfare, 692 F.2d 790, 796-97 (1st Cir.1982). Finally, any

reliance by defendants on Nelson v. Collins, 659 F.2d 420 (4th Cir.1981), is as inapposite now as it was in their argument before the Court of Appeals in 1989. Morales Feliciano v. Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, 887 F.2d at 5.
VI. Remedy
The sanction imposed by the Court will be designed to serve the function of coercing future compliance with its order. United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 67 S.Ct. 677, 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947). The relief sought by plaintiffs, both conditional retroactive fines and prospective fines of $125 per prisoner per day, could be justified on the basis of the record before the Court. Cabrera v. Municipality of Bayamón, 622 F.2d 4 (1st Cir.1980). Moreover, the Court is aware of the fact that nothing other than the imposition of heavy fines appears to move defendants toward compliance.
These facts notwithstanding, the Court is sensitive to the substantial fines that have been paid and that continue to be paid by the Commonwealth for failure to achieve compliance with the 35 square foot requirement of the 1986 stipulation.[15] Moreover, the Court wishes to dispel any perception that the remedy it adopts is intended to be punitive in effect, an impermissible purpose of a fine in the context of civil contempt. Hick v. Feiock, 485 U.S. 624, 108 S.Ct. 1423, 99 L.Ed.2d 721 (1988).
Therefore, effective as of the date of this order, the Court will impose a prospective fine of $10.00 per prisoner per day for each prisoner assigned to an institution or to a housing unit in excess of the maximum capacity established by the Court's order of January 26, 1987, approving and adopting as an order the parties' stipulation of September 8, 1986. For the purpose of this order, the maximum capacity of any institution and housing unit will be that which is designed to provide each prisoner with at least 55 square feet of living and sleeping space. The fine will be increased by $5.00 per prisoner per month on the first day of each succeeding month for each continuing violation.[16]
WHEREFORE, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants' motion to modify the Court's order of January 26, 1987, should be, and hereby is DENIED. It is further
ORDERED that defendants should be, and hereby are, adjudged to be in continuing civil contempt of the Court's Order of January 26, 1987, for their failure to provide each prisoner in the Administration of Correction at least 55 square feet of living and sleeping space in accordance with the aforementioned order. It is further
951 *951 ORDERED that, effective as of the date of this order, a daily fine of $10.00 per prisoner shall be paid by defendants whenever an inmate is held in an institution where the maximum capacity, calculated on the basis of 55 square feet of living and sleeping space per prisoner, is exceeded. The same fine shall be paid whenever a prisoner is held in a cell, dormitory, or any other particular housing unit within an institution in excess of the maximum capacity, calculated on the basis of 55 square feet of living and sleeping space per prisoner, of any such cell, dormitory, or housing unit. It is further
ORDERED that the fine imposed in the immediately preceding paragraph shall increase by the sum of $5.00 per month per prisoner on the first day of each succeeding month until defendants have achieved compliance with the Court's Order of January 26, 1987. It is further
ORDERED that all fines paid pursuant to this order shall be deposited in the registry established by the Clerk of the Court for the receipt of fines pursuant to the Court's order of July 23, 1987, where they shall be held until further order of the Court in accordance with the provisions of its orders of October 24, 1989. It is further
ORDERED that the Court Monitor shall continue to report to the Court on a regular basis the extent of noncompliance for the purpose of computing any fines required to be paid pursuant to this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

[1] Even in the absence of agreement regarding the plan, the Court indicated that the defendants' plan could be a basis for modification of existing orders if the plan were to be found satisfactory to bring about timely compliance with its orders and with the mandates of the United States Constitution and to implement the purposes of the Court's orders. All of this was announced to be contingent upon the plan's containing sufficient guarantees of timely and complete execution. June 7, 1990, Order, note 15, at p. 20.
[2] Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Commence Discovery Immediately, August 20, 1990, pp. 2-3.
[3] September 19, 1990, Order, p. 4.
[4] Plaintiffs alleged a population of 2,082, which is 434 in excess of the institution's capacity of 1,648. Plaintiffs further alleged that 580 prisoners were housed in Building 7, which has a maximum capacity of 256.
[5] Plaintiffs' Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order, filed October 22, 1990.
[6] Preliminary Injunction, October 23, 1990.
[7] The Administrator of Correction testified that she was not relying on the April 1989 projection for the following reasons:
Because that projection was made from 1986 to 1988 as a basis, and the variables that were being considered were taken on the basis of tendencies from previous years, and this situation of the impact that was being created, by the new changes, when imposing the alternatives, were not considered in that projection.
(Tr. II. 132) The "new changes" referred to by Dr. Otero consisted of legislation enacted in 1989 authorizing retroactive increases in good time (Tr. III. 80).
It is noteworthy, however, that the April 1989 projections predicted a total population of 9,487 at the end of January 1990 (Defendants' Ex. L, p. 10). In fact, the total population on that date was 9,297 (109th Report of the Court Monitor). Thus, the April 1989 study was accurate within .02%.
The April 1989 study projected a population of 10,281 as of June 30, 1990, at which time the actual population of the AOC was 9,206. On June 29, 1990, the total population was 9,439 (128th Report of the Court Monitor). Thus, the range of accuracy of the April 1989 projection in this instance is .08% to .10%.
Defendants, of course, are free to disregard the April 1989 projections if they choose to do so. They cannot claim surprise, however, at the level of population that existed on June 30, 1990. Indeed, the Acting Director of the AOC's Planning Office testified that the October 10, 1990, population of 9,941 was "more or less" predictable (Tr. III. 69-70). Defendants also assume the risk that the projections of the Planning Office for June 1991 may be accurate.
[8] Indeed, the actual AOC population in August 1990 was 9,756, or 68 greater than the January 1991 projection filed on October 1, 1990. Apparently, the projection was prepared earlier for filing with defendants' July 20, 1990, Comprehensive Plan (Tr. III. 81). The actual population at the end of July 1990, however, was 9,592, only 96 fewer than the projection for January 1991 (Defendants' Ex. I). In summary, the Court places no confidence in the projections filed on October 1, 1990.
[9] Although Dr. Otero describes this figure as being the result of "the last projection that we made" (Tr. II. 131), the Director of the AOC's Planning Office describes the April 1989 study as setting forth the most recent official projections prepared by that office (Tr. III. 80-81).
[10] For example, defendants found that "there is no qualified operator [of the water supply system]" and that "the pertinent routine samplings have not been conducted for the past two or three months" at Sabana Hoyos. "The garbage remains without being picked up for a long time," and "there are no clothes for the inmates, not even for an entrance to the institution." Defendants found "no clothing available" for inmates and an absence of fire prevention equipment at Punta Lima. Leaking showers, damaged equipment in the waste water treatment plant, an inadequate supply of mattresses, and absence of wash basins and bathrooms were noted at Zarzal. These observations were made for the months of July through September 1990 (Plaintiffs' Ex. 4).

[11] This space, it should be noted, includes the area taken up by a bed and footlocker, when beds and footlockers are made available.
[12] This number reflects only the excess of prisoners beyond the maximum capacities of institutions and housing units. Because all prisoners in noncompliant housing units are affected by crowding, the actual number of prisoners being deprived of 55 square feet of sleeping and living space is much greater. Moreover, all prisoners in an overcrowded institution suffer the ill effects associated with that condition, including deteriorated environmental conditions, absence of services and programming, and excessive violence.
In their August 10, 1987, Motion Requesting Clarification of Order of July 23, 1987, and for Modification of Recommendations of Monitor's Fifth Report, plaintiffs asked that the fine then being imposed be levied for every prisoner deprived of the minimum required space. In its order of August 14, 1987, the Court acknowledged the logic of plaintiffs' position, but limited the fine to the number of prisoners assigned in excess of institutional or housing unit capacities.
[13] See note 7, supra.
[14] Although defendants attempted to introduce testimony that early release resulting from the passage of legislation in 1989 implementing retroactive awards of good time brought about a dramatic increase in criminality (Tr. II. 24), defendants' proffered evidence 0907 even had it been admitted 0907 does not suggest, let alone support, the conclusion that the cited alternatives pose any threat to the public safety or to public perceptions of criminality. None of these alternatives would result in the automatic release of any pretrial detainee or sentenced prisoner.
[15] All but two institutions were providing at least 35 square feet of living and sleeping space per prisoner as of October 1, 1990. See 140th Report of the Court Monitor. Thus, although fines have not been fully effective to date to remedy noncompliance, it cannot be said that they have been without constructive effect.
[16] Again, the Court will limit the impact of this fine by applying it only to the number of prisoners assigned in excess of institutional or housing unit capacities rather than to all prisoners housed in an institution or housing unit in which capacity is exceeded. See note 12, supra.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 757 F.Supp. 139 (1991)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4 (PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
February 21, 1991.
Nachman & Fernández Sein, Santurce, P.R., McConnell Valdés Kelley Sifre Griggs & Ruiz-Suria, San Juan, P.R., Carlos Ramos Gonzalez, Santurce, P.R., José A. Fernandez-Paoli, Miramar, Santurce, P.R., Carlos Garcia Guttierrez, Hato Rey, P.R., Gonzalez Badillo & Davila, Harry Anduze, Pia Gallegos, Hato Rey, P.R., Jeffrey Williams, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Ramirez & Ramirez, Hato Rey, P.R., Pedro Del Valle, Federal Lit. Div., Dept. of Justice, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
ORDER ESTABLISHING SPECIAL FUND FOR PAYMENT OF PLAINTIFFS' ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES ON A REGULAR BASIS
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
By motion of January 22, 1991, plaintiffs' counsel seek the establishment of a special account for monthly advances of attorney fees and expenses from the interest earned on fines paid by defendants pursuant to the court's order of July 23, 1987. They propose detailed and specific procedures for making these advances, including semi-annual reviews pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
Plaintiffs argue in their motion that the advances they request are justified by the absence of institutional economic support for counsels' efforts. It is true that plaintiffs' litigation efforts are being supported in this case by the attorneys themselves, most of whom are individual practitioners or members of small law firms. No financial support is being provided by such entities as the United States Department of Justice, the National Prison Project, or any legal services organization.
It also is true, as plaintiffs point out, that plaintiffs' counsel were not compensated for their efforts in this litigation for almost ten years. Moreover, they have received no payment in the past eight and one-half months.
140 *140 Plaintiffs likewise are correct in their assertion that it is beyond dispute that they are prevailing parties. This has been recognized by the defendants themselves, as well as by the court in making its earlier interim awards of fees and expenses. Thus, there is no question about plaintiffs' entitlement to reasonable fees and expenses. As the court has noted on an earlier occasion, plaintiffs' counsel are entitled to compensation for continuing litigation efforts as well as for monitoring activities, even with the appointment of a court monitor in this case. Duran v. Carruthers, 885 F.2d 1492 (10th Cir.1989) and cases cited therein.
Finally, it is true, as plaintiffs assert, that the fine fund of more than $30,000,000 has generated substantial interest. More than sufficient funds under the court's control are available to permit advances to plaintiffs' counsel on a monthly basis for six-month periods without depleting the fund and without requiring that such advances be made by defendants.
In their opposition to plaintiffs' motion, defendants argue that the proposed payment mechanism is not contemplated by Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988, and they point to the fact that plaintiffs' have cited no legal authority in support of their motion. In this connection, the court notes that § 1988 sets forth no procedures for payment of fees and costs. It provides simply, in relevant part, that under certain circumstances "the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs." In

this connection, it is noteworthy that § 1988 is intended to benefit the prevailing party, the prisoners in this case. Thus, the advances sought by plaintiffs' may be likened to compensation of the plaintiff class for injuries sustained as a result of continued unconstitutional crowding throughout the Administration of Corrections.
Nonetheless, the question raised by plaintiffs' motion appears to be a novel one, as is demonstrated by defendants failure to cite any authority disapproving the procedures sought by plaintiffs. The question is a novel one for obvious reasons. But for the existence of a substantial fund composed of fines paid by defendants for their contumacious conduct, plaintiffs' motion could not be entertained, as the court would have no means by which to make monthly advances in the absence of full-blown adversarial proceedings related to § 1983 applications. Given the existence of the fund in this case, however, it is appropriate for the court to apply equitable principles in ruling on plaintiffs' motion.
At the outset, it should be noted that defendants do not approach the court with clean hands. It is their contumacious conduct that has brought about the establishment of the fine fund; moreover, they offer no substantive justification for refusing plaintiffs' motion. Indeed, the only effect of denial of plaintiffs' motion will be to provide defendants with undue leverage over this litigation by forcing opposing counsel to suffer the hardships associated with substantial delays in payment of reasonable fees and expenses. In this connection, it is worth noting that defendants have fought all applications for payment to date tooth and nail, postponing payment by appeals and administrative delays until the last possible moment. Moreover, it bears repeating that the fines that have been accumulated to date constitute funds under the court's control; they are not monies of the Commonwealth, and the court has made it clear on a number of occasions that the fines will not be returned to the defendants. Thus, use of the fine fund for monthly advances to plaintiffs' counsel, to be reimbursed by defendants following periodic proceedings pursuant to section 1988, is both appropriate and equitable.
In contrast, it is highly inequitable to require counsel who are required and expected to dedicate themselves to the vindication of their clients' constitutional rights to devote numerous hours of effort and to incur substantial expenses without hope of reasonably prompt reimbursement. Indeed, given the near-constant attention that plaintiffs' counsel must give to this litigation to the detriment of their other professional undertakings, it is unlikely 141 that the court can expect highly competent attorneys to provide the extent of representation *141 required to protect the interests of the plaintiff class unless a fair and equitable procedure is adopted to ensure timely payment of reasonable fees and expenses. Temporary advances from the accumulated fines for this purpose is particularly appropriate in view of the fact that nothing in the record of this case suggests that prior applications by plaintiffs' counsel have been unreasonable in any respect; indeed, all such applications have been approved.
Thus, the equities in this matter appear to lie with the plaintiffs. Although it is theoretically possible for the court to conduct full-blown proceedings pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on a monthly basis, it simply lacks the resources to do so. Thus, the choices appear to be twofold: require plaintiffs' counsel to suffer substantial delays in payment of reasonable fees and expenses or grant their pending motion. In view of the unusual circumstances surrounding this case that make monthly advances feasible, the fact that preliminary review by the court and regular, semi-annual proceedings pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 will ensure that only appropriate interim awards are made, and the clear balancing of equities in favor of plaintiffs' position, the substance of their motion will be granted. The court will amend the procedures recommended by plaintiffs, however, to ensure that defendants are not prejudiced in any respect by monthly advances from funds under the court's control.
Wherefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that the following procedures shall be followed with respect to advances and to interim awards of fees and costs to plaintiffs:
1. plaintiffs' counsel shall be permitted to file, and serve, detailed monthly statements of fees and expenses within the first five days of each month;
2. the court will review these statements and, to the extent they are approved, order specified sums to be advanced to each attorney;
3. these advances shall be made only from interest earned on fines paid by defendants pursuant to the court's order of July 23, 1987;

4. defendants are granted leave to file objections within 10 days of the filing of each application by plaintiffs' counsel;
5. every six months, the court will review prior advances and any earlier objections filed by defendants and will make an appropriate interim award of fees and expenses pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988.
6. interim awards of fees and expenses ordered following review pursuant to Title 42 U.S.C. § 1988 shall be deposited by defendants into the fine fund maintained by the Clerk of Court; and
7. in the event that any previously advanced fees, costs, or both are disallowed as interim awards, plaintiffs' counsel shall reimburse the fine fund forthwith; in the event that any previously claimed fees, costs, or both that were not approved for advance are approved as interim awards, appropriate payments will be ordered to be made by defendants to plaintiffs' counsel.
It is further ORDERED that any attorney representing the plaintiff class who seeks monthly advances pursuant to the procedures set forth above shall be relieved of the obligation to file monthly statements of fees and expenses under seal. In all other respects, the court's order entered on August 18, 1988 and filed on August 19, 1988 shall remain in full force and effect.
SO ORDERED.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 775 F.Supp. 487 (1991)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
October 10, 1991.
488 *488 Nachman & Fernandez Sein, Santurce, P.R., McConnell Valdes Kelley Sifre Griggs & Ruiz-Suria, San Juan, P.R., Carlos Ramos Gonzalez, Santurce, P.R., Jose A. Fernandez Paoli, Miramar, Santurce, P.R., Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Gonzalez Badillo & Davila, Harry Anduze, Pia Gallegos, Hato Rey, P.R., Jeffrey Williams, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Ramirez & Ramirez, Hato Rey, P.R., Pedro Del Valle, Federal Lit. Div., Dept. of Justice, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
For over ten years, this Court has been attempting to require the Administration of Corrections of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to operate institutions that comply with constitutionally required norms. With isolated exceptions, the record of compliance with this Court's orders has been dismal. Large fines have been levied with seemingly little effect. The lack of resolution and, at least currently, the lack of any prospect of resolution, bring to this Court a sense of judicial frustration without parallel in its experience. Today, the Court takes a step that it hoped to avoid but it believes has become necessary to break the current log jam.
In 1980, this Court entered its first order finding that overcrowding and other conditions in the prison system operated by the Commonwealth violated the constitutional rights of the persons confined there. The defendants were ordered, inter alia, to provide at least 35 square feet of living and sleeping space to each inmate in the system. See Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14, 41 (D.P.R.1980). At no time in the next six years did the defendants meet the court-ordered standard. In 1986, the parties entered into a stipulation that again reiterated the 35 square-foot requirement, set a deadline of January 1, 1987, for compliance with the 35 square-foot standard, and specified how such a standard would apply in particular institutions.[1] As of July 1987, inmates still were being subjected to non-compliance with the 35 square-foot standard, prompting this Court to begin imposing contempt fines as a method of coercing compliance. See Morales Feliciano v. Parole Board of Puerto Rico, 887 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1989); July 23, 1987, Opinion and Order 697 F.Supp. 26 (finding defendants in contempt and imposing sanctions); August 15, 1988, Memorandum Opinion and Order (increasing sanctions); February 6, 1991, Order re: 142nd Report at 1 (limiting fines to $300.00 per day per inmate).
With the exception of an eight-month period between January and August 1990, during which defendants achieved compliance with the 35 square-foot standard, defendants have been in contempt of this Court's 35 square-foot directive each and every month. To date, the Commonwealth has paid a total of $68,240,910.00 in fines based on violations of the 35 square-foot standard.[2]
Yet, this enormous outlay by the Commonwealth has not resulted in any reasonable progress towards the goal of a unified plan to achieve compliance. Current conditions of overcrowding are confirmed by the bi-weekly reports submitted by the Court Monitor. Proof of lack of improvement of systems in areas other than overcrowding reaches the Court regularly in the form of reports by the Court Monitor.[3]
489

*489 Despite the continuing horrors within the walls of the institutions, defendants produce more excuses than results. Repeated promises by defendants, usually accompanied by a plea for relief from the fines, never result in implementation. For instance, an emergency temporary housing plan that was to add 1,000 beds to the system by June 30, 1991, and thereby provide 55 square feet per inmate, has not yet yielded a single additional bed. This pattern of broken promises and abandoned plans must be stopped, and the business of making lasting changes in the administration of this system must be started.
In an effort to force this case out of its current deadlock, to indicate to the parties that the patience of the Court finally is at an end, and to demonstrate that the Court will settle for nothing less than a satisfactory resolution to this litigation, the Court will order the Clerk of the Court to transfer $1,000,000.00 from the special account currently holding the fine monies in this case to the United States Treasury on October 18, 1991, and to transfer another $1,000,000.00 in the same manner each Friday following October 18, 1991. See July 23, 1987, Opinion and Order; August 14, 1987, Order (imposing sanctions and creating special account).
This transfer is not without warning. In its October 24, 1989, order creating the Special Advisory Committee, the Court put all parties on notice that a continued failure to achieve compliance with the stipulated square footage requirements would result in "the transfer of a substantial amount on deposit ... to the United States Treasury." See October 24, 1989, order at 2. Moreover, the Court takes this action against the backdrop of the Court of Appeal's October 3, 1991, Memorandum and Order, in which the Court of Appeals set out its intention to postpone decision on defendants' appeal from the 55 square feet implementation order and contempt fines pending decision by the United States Supreme Court on a matter raising similar issues. The Court believes this action to be consistent with the desire expressed in the Court of Appeals' Memorandum and Order that the order withholding decision on the appeal not interfere in any way with efforts on the part of the parties or the Court to achieve a negotiated compliance plan that would move this case forward. At present, the Court knows of no meaningful negotiations between the parties of the type referred to by the Court of Appeals. It is the Court's belief that today's order will force both sides in the direction of such an agreement.
It is important to note that, in deference to the pending appeal of the January 10, 1991, order 754 F.Supp. 942 denying defendants' request for further delay of imposition of the 55 square-foot standard and imposing sanctions for violations of that standard, today's order will affect only fine monies collected for contempt of this Court's 35 square feet order and will not include any of the monies collected on the basis of contempt of the 55 square feet order. Furthermore, the transfer of fine monies effectuated by today's order is without prejudice to any plan for use of the fine monies to improve the lot of Puerto Rico's inmate population consistent with prior orders of this Court, to the degree that such monies have not been transferred pursuant to this order.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall transfer $1,000,000.00 from the special account currently holding fine monies in this case to the United States Treasury on October 18, 1991.
It is FURTHER ORDERED that thereafter, until further order of the Court, the Clerk of the Court shall transfer $1,000,000.00 from the special account to the United States Treasury each and every Friday.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] The stipulation also included provisions requiring the system to reach a level of 55 square feet per inmate by January 1, 1988.
[2] The Commonwealth has also paid another $6,803,980.00 for violations of the 55 square-foot directive. The January 10, 1991, order denying defendants' request for further delays in implementation of the 55 square-foot standard and imposing contempt sanctions for violations of it currently is pending before the First Circuit Court of Appeals.
[3] See, e.g., 137th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 First Report on Defendants' State of Compliance with the Court's March 30, 1990, Order, confirmed April 23, 1991; 148th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report Enclosing Expert's Report on Security and Life Safety, confirmed August 28, 1991; 156th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Conditions at the State Penitentiary, confirmed June 10, 1991. Most recently, the monitor filed the 174th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Water Shortage at the State Penitentiary, which describes a

seven-week water shortage at the State Penitentiary that may have contributed to a serious gastroenteritis outbreak following a riot at that overcrowded institution in July 1991.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 124 F.Supp.2d 774 (2000)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs v.
Pedro ROSELLOÓ GONZÁLEZ, et al., Defendants
No. 79-04(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
December 20, 2000.
775 *775 Carlos V. Garcia-Gutierrez, San Juan, PR, Dennisse N. Longo-De-Morgan, Special Asst Atty General, Department of Justice, Office of Attorney General, Manuel A. Rodriguez-Banchs, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs.
Rick Nemcik-Cruz, Rio Grande, PR, for Defendants.
OPINION & ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
Procedural Background
The long and unfortunate history of this case is well known to the parties and need not be discussed at length here. The immediate issue at bar concerns whether Defendants should be held in contempt for violating Court Orders concerning the usage of admission cells and the filing of a court notice and staffing report for new facilities. A short discussion of how the issue was brought to the Court's attention and some pertinent history follows.
776 The Court first dealt with overcrowding in the Administration of Correction's institutions *776 twenty years ago when it issued its preliminary injunction governing prison conditions. Feliciano v. Barcelo, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1979). Before that decision was entered, a number of cases had been litigated and settled in this Court and resulted in contempt proceedings for noncompliance: negotiations with plaintiffs' court-appointed counsel averted the sanctions sought for contempt. Feliciano, 497 F.Supp. at 16-17, n. 2. The first hearings in this case resulted in a preliminary injunction ordering relieve of the uncontrolled overcrowding that prevailed in AOC institutions.
In 1986, the court issued an Opinion and Order, Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F.Supp. 591 (D.P.R.1986), aff'd 887 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1989), in which the court evaluated compliance with the 1980 Preliminary Injunction:
The Court must regrettably find, however, that the defendants have all too frequently offered the appearance of compliance with its decree as a substitute for obedience, the laws of the Commonwealth have been ignored by administrators (at all levels) who disobey in silence, and vast sums of money, whose expenditure has been repeatedly proffered to the Court as evidence of reformation, have been wasted without bringing about any substantial and enduring change in the reality of daily life in Puerto Rico's prisons. What little has been done, the Court finds, is only the result of the Court's prior intervention ...
Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F.Supp. at 594.
As to overcrowding, this Court stated that "[a]s the Court visited each institution the sense of physical closeness and the revulsion at so much compressed humanity grew to an awareness of the psychological stress which

must affect any human being almost totally deprived of any privacy or intimacy." Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F.Supp. at 597.
In 1986, Plaintiffs filed a motion to hold defendants in contempt for their failure to obey the overcrowding reduction orders in the Preliminary Injunction. Defendants again escaped being held in contempt by entering into a stipulation with Plaintiffs. This stipulation imposed a time limitation on admission cell usage. See Stipulation dated September 8, 1986 (further discussed bellow).
By 1990 the detention cells, holding pens, and admission cells were again the subject of controversy[1]. On 22 February 1990, the Court ordered the Court Monitor to recommend maximum capacities for each admission cell not specifically addressed in the 1986 Stipulation. This led to the Court Monitor's 107th Report, which reported the capacities of the then-existing admission cells, detention cells, and holding pens. Relying on the defendants' own capacity estimates, the court monitor set a 16.9 square foot capacity for future cells and pens.
After a change in equitable defendants on January 2, 1993, Plaintiffs again sought to hold Defendants in contempt. With minor modifications, the facts set out by plaintiffs in their contempt motion were stipulated as correct by Defendants in a Motion to Submit Amendment. Negotiations ensued which produced, after months of deliberation, the Revised Stipulation (Dkt.5094), on which Plaintiffs ground their present requests for fines and compensatory relief.
On January 30, 1998 Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Order to Show Cause Why Defendants Should Not be Held in Contempt For Holding Inmates in Admission Cells in Violation of the Court's Orders (Dkt.6759). In that motion 777 Plaintiffs assert that Defendant's violated this Court's orders regarding (1) the maximum amount *777 of time an inmate may be held in a detention cell, holding pen or admission cell, (2) the maximum number of inmates which may be placed in admissions cells, (3) the immediate notification to the Court on newly created admission cell areas, and (4) the filing of staffing patterns prior to opening new facilities. On April 30, 1998, Defendants responded by filing an opposition to Plaintiffs' motion. (Dkt.6785). On May 15, 1998, Plaintiffs amended their motion (Dkt.6812), and Defendants responded in opposition on July 6, 1998. (Dkt.6858).
The Court issued an order to show cause why Defendant's should not be held in contempt. Evidentiary hearings were held on July 13, 15-17, 21-23 and October 13-15, 1998. After comprehensively considering the extensive amount of documentary and testimonial evidence presented during the hearing, the Court finds as follows.
I. Findings of Fact
A. The Court Orders
The September 8, 1986 Stipulation set forth limitations on the use of the Administration of Corrections's (AOC) housing units and facilities. The stipulation provided, in part that
"Detention cells, holding pens or admission areas shall be used only for temporary detention and transfer purposes. Inmates may be held in any such cell, pen or area for a maximum period of 24 hours, during which time they must be under constant supervision to ensure that their safety and hygienic needs are met".
Stipulation dated September 8, 1986 (filed September 10, 1986; Dkt.910). This stipulation was approved by Order dated January 26, 1987 (Dkt.948).
The Court Monitor's 107th Report Recommending Maximum Capacities for Detention Cells (Dkt.2122) established maximum capacities for detention cells throughout the correctional system. This Court adopted the report in its May 23, 1990 Order which instructed Defendant's to follow the maximum capacities established in the monitor's report. (Dkt.2236). In case of an emergency, the capacity of admission cells could be exceeded but not for more than eight hours. Defendants were directed to notify the Court "as quickly as possible" if they exceeded the cells capacities for "emergency" reasons. Id.

The May 23, 1990 Order reiterated to Defendants that they were not to hold inmates in admission cells for more than 24 hours. In the Court's own words "the aforementioned cells [admission cells] shall be used only for temporary detention and transfer purposes. Inmates may be held in any such cell for a maximum period of 24 hours". Id. (emphasis added). Defendants were further charged with the obligation of providing constant supervision of admission cells to assure the inmate's "safety and hygienic needs". Id. Defendants were to notify the Court of the location, size and designation of any cell not addressed by the order if that cell was to be used for admissions purposes.
In 1994, Defendants agreed to be subject to automatic fines in the event that they housed inmates in admission cells in violation of the Court's orders. These unappealable fines and the conditions under which they will be 778 imposed, are set forth in paragraph III.B.3 of the parties Revised Stipulation (Dkt.5094)[2]. This *778 Court further elaborated on the procedure for imposition of such fines in its Order Finally Approving Stipulations Regarding Security, Staffing, FRP, Classification and Other Matters (Dkt.5429).
On September 1, 1994 the parties entered into a Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing ("Staffing Stipulation") (Dkt.5241). This stipulation specified, at paragraph 44, that "defendants will not open any new facilities, new housing units, or housing units rehabilitated under the Facilities Rehabilitation Program until defendants have filed a staffing pattern for the facility or unit..." The Court approved the stipulation on December 5, 1994 (Dkt.5429) and directed defendants to implement the stipulation's provisions.
B. Particularity of Admission Cells
Admission cells, holding pens and detention cells must be managed differently from the rest of the correctional facility. Inmates are not expected to remain in intake facilities for prolonged periods of time. Thus, admission cells lack many of the features that make housing units habitable. In general, admission cells lack toilets, beds, bathing or washing facilities, drinking fountains and are usually located in areas where access to programming and recreational facilities is limited or nonexistent.
Admission cells house inmates which are at a particularly susceptible period of their correctional tenure. For starters some of the inmates quartered in these cells come directly from the street. Little is known about these inmates. Correctional officers are ignorant of such things as whether the newly arrived inmates are particularly violent, whether they are in need of any special care or whether they are particularly susceptible to attacks by the rest of the prison population. Not everything is known about the inmate's health before he mixes with other inmates in an admission cell[3]. Overcrowding and prolonged stays in admission cells increases the vulnerability of the overall situation and the spreading of diseases.
It was with this scenario in mind that this Court ordered Defendants to rectify their unconstitutional treatment of inmates locked up in admission cells[4].
C. Conditions of Confinement in Admission Cells
Ponce Southern Detention Center
Fase III at the Ponce Southern Detention Center (referred to herein as "Ponce Fase III") has 10 admission cells. 779 These cells are divided between two areas of the *779 institution 0907 the corrections area and the medical area[5].
Prolonged Stays & Overcrowding
Both testimonial and detailed documentary evidence demonstrate that inmates were held in the Ponce Fase III admission cells far beyond 24 hours. One inmate testified that he was held in an admission cell for eighteen days. Another testified as to being held for twelve days. Reports from the AOC's "compliance office"[6] state that

at one point 105 of the 111 inmates housed in the admissions cell areas at Ponce Fase III had been there for more than 24 hours "without any type of movement"[7]. Pls. Ex. 133, 136. According to these reports two inmates had been there from November 1, 1997 to at least the time when the report was written 0907 November 13, 1997.
The testimonial evidence relating to overcrowding vividly corroborates the documentary evidence. According to inmate testimony some of them were held for three days in a cell with a capacity of six, in which nine inmates were housed. Another inmate stated that he was held approximately twelve days in a cell with a capacity of nine, in which sixteen to twenty-three inmates were housed. Yet another inmate testified that he had been held in the intake area for fourteen days in a cell with a capacity of nine, in which up to fifteen inmates were housed. Back in November of 1997, officers from the compliance office determined that the Ponce admissions area was suffering from "a clear and punitive overcrowding"[8]. Defendant's failed to provide the Court with any evidence and/or notice to the effect that this overcrowding was compelled by an emergency.
Inmates were often compelled to take turns sleeping, or to sleep sitting up because there was not enough room to lay down. They slept on the floor and were not provided mattresses, blankets or sheets to cover themselves. At times the lack of sleeping space caused altercations among the inmates. Not to mention muscle pain and spasms. Up to at least May of 1998, inmates did not receive any recreation outside their cell during the time they were locked in the admission cells.
Hygiene
Cells in the medical area did not have toilets in them until March or April of 1998. All inmates in the medical area, at times more than fifty, used only one toilet located outside the cell. In order to use the toilet, inmates had to rely on an officer to open their cell and escort them to the bathroom. When officers did not acquiesce to their requests for access to the toilet, which apparently happened on a regular basis, inmates urinated inside or just outside the cell.
Memoranda and letters attest to the numerous sanitation and health problems endured by both the inmates and the medical personnel stationed in close quarters with the inmates. Pls. Ex. 55; 64 to 73 One of these letters 780 warns that medical personnel *780 themselves were feeling the effects of overcrowding under deplorable sanitary conditions. Pls. Ex. 67. Medical personnel suffered from conjunctivitis, allergies, nausea and other conditions associated with their work environment. At one point, one of the nurses vomited due to the strong stench. Pls Ex. 68. Inmates housed in admission cells suffered the same effects but to a higher degree. The letters further substantiate that cells in the medical area were full of flies.
Testimony reveals that the admissions cells at Ponce III were infested with cockroaches. There was vomit and urine on the floor of the cells. The extent of the roach infestation compelled some inmates to use toilet paper to plug their ears for fear that cockroaches would crawl into their ears.
Prisoners were provided with only one set of clothes which were never laundered. Inmates were not issued so much as a change of underwear. As a result, the admissions cells were permeated by the stench of old clothing, coupled with the smell of urine and vomit. Poor ventilation and high temperatures only worsen the situation.
Inmates who washed their clothes did it in the shower during their bath time. Because inmates were given only one change of clothes, those that washed their clothes either had to wear them wet until they dried, or had to spend time unclothed in crowded cells.
Aside from the small cake of soap provided to inmates for baths, inmates were infrequently provided with toothpaste, toothbrushes, deodorant, razors, toilet paper or other-personal hygiene items. They were not provided with towels to dry themselves, and had to dry themselves with their shirts, or share towels.
The admission cells at Ponce III were not cleaned regularly. Some inmates testified that they were not cleaned at all. The Court finds that no program of sanitation was in place to regularly clean the cells.

Health and Access to Medical Attention and Facilities
Sick call was denied to or was inadequately available to inmates while in the Ponce admission cells. Guards were not always willing or able to give inmates access to medical facilities. According to testimony, one inmate who had an earache was compelled to cut himself so that a guard would take him to the medical area. It took around twenty minutes for the inmate to receive medical attention.
Perhaps the most serious deficiency in the provision of medical care involves inmates suffering from drug withdrawal following their admission to prison. Drug withdrawal, if not attended to properly causes nausea, vomiting, chills, pains, restlessness, irritability, and anxiety. The record indicates that numerous inmates were denied the necessary medication and suffered through withdrawal on the floor of crowded admission cells. These inmates would vomit inside the cell. They were restless and often kept other inmates awake, increasing tensions. At times, inmates dealt with the lack of adequate care by self-medicating with medicines discarded by other inmates.
Ponce admission cell inmates did not have access to drinking water inside their cells. Instead, inmates had to rely on guards to allow them access to water outside the cell. Sometimes, guards were either unable or unwilling to allow inmates access to drinking water.
The intense overcrowding coupled with unsanitary conditions increases the risk of diseases caused by contact with blood and secretions such as Hepatitis C, Hepatitis B, HIV and Herpes. The Court finds that inmates housed in Ponce III admissions cells were unnecessarily exposed to serious health risks.
Security
781 The configuration of some cells at Ponce's correctional admissions area do *781 not lend themselves to constant sight and sound surveillance. In order to observe what is occurring inside the cell area a correctional officer would have to be located directly in front of the each of those cells. The Court finds that no officers were stationed permanently or even occasionally in front of those cells.
Only three guards were assigned to supervise 30-60 inmates in the medical admissions area. At some point there was only one guard appointed to the area. This guard had to escort the inmates to the bathroom, give them water, take them to the medical facilities when needed and ensure security for the whole area including the 60 or so inmates and the medical staff.
Letters from Correctional Health personnel to Ponce officials attest to the lack of security measures in the area. Pls. Ex. 64-73. Medical personnel pleaded with Ponce officials for more security because they feared for their safety. Although numerous letters were written, the personnel's prayers went unanswered for at least six months.
Guards assigned to the admissions area were often removed to cover other areas. At one point, the inmates in the medical area opened the gates to their cells and harassed female medical officers.
The lack of guards, an unsafe cell configuration, cell overcrowding, deplorable sanitary conditions, a lack of sleep and inmates who are going through drug withdrawal makes the perfect equation of a volatile, unsecured and very dangerous situation.
Bayamón Regional Detention Center
The Bayamón Regional Detention Center ("Bayamón 308"), has four admission cells. The conditions at these cells were similar to those found for Ponce III. A quick summary of the conditions follows.

Crowding and Duration Violations
The admissions cells at Bayamón 308 were closed for renovation during much of 1997. Beginning in September 1997, Defendants began overcrowding the admission cells and maintaining inmates there well beyond 24 hours. Inmates testified to the effect that they were held in the admission cells for 44 days, two months, over six months and seventy-four days. This practice was continuous, affected a great number of inmates and persisted at least into mid-July of 1998.
As to cell overcrowding, Defendants continuously housed inmates in excess of the cell's capacity, a practice which continued as of October 1999[9]. The total capacity of the admission cells at Bayamón is 74 inmates. At times as many as 136 inmates were housed in the admissions area. Inmates testified as to the overcrowding in their cells. Forty to forty-five in a cell that had a maximum capacity of twenty; forty-five to fifty people in each cell; Thirty to thirty-five in a cell for sixteen; Thirty to thirty-five inmates in the cell; Twenty-five inmates; Fifty-eight. A report filed by Department of Health 0907 Correctional Program found that at one point cell A with a capacity of 16 housed 25; Cell B with a capacity of 20 housed 40; Cell C capacity of 20 housed 50 and cell D with a capacity of 18 housed 21. Pls. Ex. 55.
As in Ponce III, inmates in Bayamón 308 admission cells were forced to sleep on top of each other, standing up, sitting up, on cement benches, or on windowsills. Some inmates had to tie themselves to the bars of the cell with their belts so that they could sleep standing up without falling. Defendants did not provide beds, linens or pillows to any inmates. Some inmates were provided with filthy pieces of foam rubber. The rest were forced to sleep on 782 the bare floor 0907 which causes *782 harm in the form of muscular pain and spasms. The lack of quality rest time causes irritability, anxiety and general malaise, all of which increases agitation among the inmates.
Inmates in the Bayamón 308 admission cells did not have access to drinking water or any amount of recreation. They encountered difficulty when trying to get access to drinking water. Inmates who succeeded in getting the guard's attention filled a bottle of water and brought it back to the cell. Inmates would all drink from the same bottle.
Inmates were deprived access to educational programs, work programs, religious services and the facility's socio-penal staff. Some of the inmates were not able to communicate with their families for more than a month.
It is clear that the extensive number of inmates led to tension between staff and inmates. A small number of guards were assigned to cover the admissions area. Overburdened with requests, staff would ignore inmates' requests to leave the cells to use the toilet or get a drink of water. This infuriated the inmates.
Hygiene
The lack of sanitation in the Bayamón 308 detention cells represented a serious problem and a grave threat to the health of the inmates, prison staff, and anyone that visited the area. A report by Correctional Health personnel presents a comprehensive summary of the lack of sanitation in the area and the health problems associated with it. Pls. Ex. 55.
As of May 1998 there were no toilets inside the admission cells at Bayamón. In order to perform bodily functions inmates had to get an officer's attention and be escorted to the bathroom. At times, guards took as long as a whole hour to assist inmates. Often, the officers were either unable or unwilling to allow inmates access to the toilets. Thus, inmates urinated in communal buckets or other containers located inside the cell.
Inmates in the Bayamón admissions area had infrequent access to hygiene items such as soap and toilet paper. Usually there was not enough soap with which to bathe. Inmates shared towels or dried themselves with dirty clothes. They shared razors and the plastic containers used for urination. This practice increases the risk of diseases caused by contact with blood and secretions. Overcrowding further increased the spreading of air born diseases.

As in Ponce III, inmates' clothes were not changed and no laundry services was provided. Inmates washed their clothes by hand in the shower. They wore them wet until they dried.
The admissions area was infested with cockroaches.. The area was filthy, strewn with food remains and human waste, and permeated with the stench of sweat, urine, vomit, smoke. The lack of ventilation and heat of over 95 0905 only made matters worse.
Access to Medical Attention and Facilities
AOC staff at Bayamón 308 did not take sufficient measures to ensure that inmates were provided with necessary medical attention. Sometimes, patients waited some twelve hours to see a doctor. Often patients were not taken to the medical area at all. The Court finds that newly arrived inmates did not get timely medical clearance before getting mixed with other inmates in the admissions. This practice increased the risk of disease.
AOC did not provide sufficient bed apace in the medical detoxification area. As a result, many inmates suffered through withdrawal in the bare floor of admission cells. These inmates did not receive the treatments necessary for withdrawal. They experienced nausea, vomiting, chills, pain, restlessness, anxiety and irritability, all of which adversely affects discipline, security and the rest of the inmates in the area.
783 *783 Security
The admission cells at Bayamón 308 are configured in a way that makes them particularly difficult to supervise. Cells C and D are located directly behind cells B and A, respectively. A heavy mesh screen obstructs the view into the two rear cells. Security officers' view into cells C and D is obstructed by the heavy mesh screens separating cell B from cell C and cell A from cell D, as well as by the inmates located in cells B and A. Additionally, the only area from which cells C and D can be accessed is through a narrow corridor between the cells. The corridor is so narrow that during a disturbance security guards could easily be obstructed from entering the corridor.
Due to the inordinate number of prisoners housed in the admissions area, different categories of inmates were mixed in the same cells. Pre-trial inmates were housed together with sentenced inmates; young adults were mixed with adults; inmates with special protective custody needs, such as former security guards, were not separated from the rest of the admission cell population. As in Ponce III, the admissions area at Bayamón provided the perfect equation for an unsecured and volatile situation.
D. The Defendants
Defendants comprise the Governor of Puerto Rico, the Administrator of Corrections, members of the Parole Board and other administrative officers and the Secretary of Health. The Court finds that none of the defendants except for the Administrator of Corrections have direct responsibility for cell overcrowding in the admission cells of Puerto Rico. Thus, all of the Defendants other than the Administrator cannot be held responsible for noncompliance with the Court orders. As to the Administrator of Corrections the Court finds as follows:
The Administrator of Corrections
In her capacity as an Administrator, Laboy is directly responsible for cell overcrowding. She has authority to control or remedy such condition in Puerto Rico's correctional facilities. The Court finds that Ms. Laboy wantonly ignored or disregarded this Court's Orders. Evidence demonstrates that as early as August 1997, Laboy had knowledge of admission cell overcrowding in violation of this Court's Orders. Nonetheless, Laboy failed to take any timely active action to alleviate the situation.

The Court recognizes that the Administrator is endowed with great responsibility. Puerto Rico's correctional system is indeed a very complex system with a plethora of problems. Of course, no human being is capable of making every single minute decision regarding the systems' management. A competent correctional administrator must delegate some of her functions. Nonetheless, this is a weak and unconvincing excuse for housing inmates in virtually inhumane conditions.
The evidence establishes that it was not until February of 1998 0907 after plaintiffs filed their contempt motion 0907 that Ms. Laboy took some meaningful steps to alleviate the situation. Before that time, Ms. Laboy took little or no action to ascertain her obligations under the court's orders, to discover the extent of the violations, or to correct them. All of these facts were easily available to Ms. Laboy. As Puerto Rico's Correctional Administrator, Ms. Laboy is obviously under the obligation to ascertain them.
Laboy's inaction as to Bayamón 308 is an example of her neglect. On or about July of 1997, Administrator Laboy was informed of the problem with overcrowding at Bayamón's admission cells. Although overcrowding represented a serious violation of this Court's Orders Laboy took no action at that time other than to delegate the 784 responsibility for the problem to the Regional Director. Bayamón's Regional Director did not solve the problem. *784 Nor did the following Regional Director correct the deficiencies. In the face of these failures, Laboy herself should have taken an active role to insure compliance. Instead, she did not inquire as to the duration of the prolonged detentions, to the seriousness of the overcrowding, or the nature of the living conditions in those cells. Notably, Laboy failed to establish or even inquire as to possible solutions to the problem. Her position is that she fully complied with the Court's orders by delegating her responsibility to the Regional Director. The Court disagrees.
Delegation of this type of serious problem cannot function properly without accountability and clear standards and procedures. The Administrator, however, did not cause clear standards and procedures regarding the use of admission cells to be implemented, nor did she inquire into whether they existed. Only now is the Administration of Correction attempting to draft uniform procedures for the use of admission cells, detention cells, and holding pens. As was true back in 1979,
"[t]he Court cannot, in view of the evidence, and the fact that half-hearted attempts to correct anything have only been made at the eleventh hour, most of them during the hearing, stay its hand or defer to the local authorities."
Morales Feliciano, 497 F.Supp. at 19 (footnote omitted)
Laboy herself testified that as a general practice inmates in Puerto Rico regularly sleep in admission cells. She also testified to the effect that holding inmates for up to 48 hours in admission cells is acceptable. Administrator Laboy's own testimony reveals that she is either ignorant as to her obligations under this Court's orders or that she wantonly and willfully disregards them[10]. It is hard to believe that as of October 13, 1998 (the date when the Administrator testified) she still did not comprehend her obligations under the Orders.
Overcrowding and detentions far in excess of 24 hours in admission cells continued as of at least October 1999. This in spite of Defendants' knowledge of the problem and in spite of the fact that Plaintiffs requested that defendants be held in contempt for this situation in January of 1998. The Court is appalled.
Findings of Law
A. Contempt
"Federal courts are not reduced to issuing injunctions and hoping for compliance. Once issued, an injunction may be enforced." Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 690, 98 S.Ct. 2565, 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978). Court decrees, whether consented or stipulated to, are subject to continuing supervision and enforcement. "[A] court has an affirmative duty to protect the integrity of its decree. This duty arises where the performance of one party threatens to frustrate the purpose of the decree." Stotts v. Memphis Fire Dep't, 679 F.2d 541, 557 (6th Cir.1982), rev'd on

other grounds sub nom. Firefighters Local Union No. 1784 v. Stotts, 467 U.S. 561, 104 S.Ct. 2576, 81 L.Ed.2d 483 (1984) (footnote omitted) (discussing cases); Berger v. Heckler, 771 F.2d 1556, 1558 (2d Cir.1985).
Contempt of a federal court consists in, inter alia, "disobedience or resistance to a court's lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree or command." See 18 U.S.C. § 401. The United States district courts have the inherent authority and duty to protect and effectuate their judgments and to punish disobedience of or resistance to their lawful orders and decrees. First Sec. Nat. Bank and Trust v. U.S., 382 U.S. 34, 35, 86 S.Ct. 157, 15 L.Ed.2d 28 (1965); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 697 F.Supp. 26, (D.P.R. 1987) citing Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S.Ct. 1401, 3 L.Ed.2d 5, 3 L.Ed.2d 19 (1958). The power of courts to punish for contempt is a necessary and 785 integral part of the independence of the judiciary, and it *785 is absolutely essential to the performance of the duties imposed on them by law. Id. This power does not evaporate when the cost of compliance is high. Fortin v. Comm. of Mass., 692 F.2d 790 (1st. Cir. 1982).
The real purpose of a civil contempt order is purely remedial 0907 to coerce obedience to a decree passed in complainant's favor, or to compensate complainant for loss caused by respondent's disobedience of such decree. Parker v. U.S., 153 F.2d 66, 70 (1st Cir.1946). The measure of the courts's power in civil contempt proceedings is determined by the requirement of full remedial relief. McComb v. Jacksonville Paper, 336 U.S. 187, 193, 69 S.Ct. 497, 93 L.Ed. 599 (1949). "If complainant makes a showing that respondent has disobeyed a decree in complainant's favor and that damages have resulted to complainant thereby, complainant is entitled as of right to an order in civil contempt imposing a compensatory fine". Parker, 153 F.2d at 70; See also Union Tool Co. v. Wilson, 259 U.S. 107, 42 S.Ct. 427, 66 L.Ed. 848 (1922). In civil, as opposed to criminal contempt, the court has no discretion to withhold the appropriate remedial order. Id. In this respect, civil contempt is somewhat analogous to a tort judgment for damages.
Recognizing that court's have "awesome civil and criminal contempt power" the First Circuit has established a number of principles designed to oversee its deployment. First, when levying contempt sanctions the court must exercise the least possible power suitable to achieve the end proposed. Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265, 110 S.Ct. 625, 107 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990), Project B.A.S.I.C. v. Kemp, 947 F.2d 11, 15 (1st Cir.1991). Related to this requirement is the principle that where a fine is imposed it must not exceed the actual loss caused by respondent's violation plus complainant's reasonable expenses in bringing the action. Parker, 153 F.2d at 71. Second, a complainant must prove civil contempt by "clear and convincing evidence". Langton v. Johnston, 928 F.2d 1206, 1220 (1st Cir.1991); Project B.A.S.I.C, 947 F.2d at 15. Lastly, civil contempt will lie only where the putative contemnor has violated an order that is clear and unambiguous. International Longshoremen's Ass'n, Local 1291 v. Philadelphia Marine, 389 U.S. 64, 76, 88 S.Ct. 201, 19 L.Ed.2d 236 (1967), NBA Properties v. Gold, 895 F.2d 30, 32 (1st Cir.1990);
The Court is convinced that Defendant blatantly and egregiously violated this Court's clear and unambiguous orders. Throughout the course of the evidentiary hearing, Plaintiff's presented abundant and detailed numerical proof that convincingly establish that the terms of the stipulation were violated. The numerical proof was supported with vivid and often horrific testimony from inmates who were housed in AOC's admission cells.
In an effort to avoid sanctions, Defendant raises two affirmative defenses: substantial compliance and impossibility.
B. Defendant's Defenses
Impossibility
Defendant claims that she was unable to comply with the court's orders because of (a) increased or massive police raids; (b) the unavailability of beds system-wide because of the Facilities Rehabilitation Program and other reasons; (c) unexpected increases in the number of inmates entering the correctional system; (d) new legislation increasing the sentences for repeat offenders and limiting the eligibility for parole and community release programs; and (e) an increase in the protective custody population, in part due to the AOC's "zero tolerance" policy toward gangs. Defendants contend that these factors made compliance with the orders impossible.

Impossibility or inability to comply with a judicial decree is a valid defense to civil contempt charges. United 786 States v. Bryan, 339 U.S. 323, 330-34, 70 S.Ct. 724, 94 L.Ed. 884 (1950); United *786 States v. Rylander, 460
U.S. 752, 757, 103 S.Ct. 1548, 75 L.Ed.2d 521 (1983); Star Financial Services v. Aastar, 89 F.3d 5, 13 (1st Cir.1996). The burden of establishing impossibility or inability to comply as a defense to civil contempt is on the party raising the defense. Rylander, 460 U.S. at 752, 103 S.Ct. 1548. If inability to comply is to serve as a valid defense to civil contempt, it must be demonstrated clearly and categorically. Morales Feliciano 697 F.Supp. at 35. Such burden is difficult to meet. Fortin v. Com'r of Mass. Dept. of Public Welfare, 692 F.2d 790, 796 (1st Cir.1982) ; see also United States v. Fleischman, 339 U.S. 349, 362-63, 70 S.Ct. 739, 94 L.Ed. 906 (1950). "The test of impossibility may be particularly strict in a case such as this one, in which the needs of applicants are urgent." Fortin, 692 F.2d at 797. Here, the needs of the Plaintiffs are definitely "urgent".
The Court holds that Defendant failed to carry her evidentiary burden. The evidence presented by Defendant consisted almost entirely of the testimony of James Garvey, an expert in correctional operations. Mr. Garvey's testimony did not establish how the AOC's failure to adhere to the capacity and duration standards stemmed from the impossibility of compliance. As was true ten years ago in this very case:
The [Commonwealth] has not shown that causes beyond its control have made it overwhelmingly difficult or anywhere near impossible to [follow the district court's orders]. The Commonwealth has had considerable time to meet its self-imposed [standards] ....
Morales-Feliciano v. Parole, 887 F.2d 1, 5 (1989).
The reasons proffered for defendant's alleged inability or difficulty in complying with the court's orders, although perhaps facially plausible, are not supported by the facts. Any difficulty in compliance resulting from the AOC's failure to adequately anticipate and plan how it would handle expected growths in the penal population or problems in housing protective custody inmates is of its own making. The same is true for problems relating to building rehabilitation.
Defendant has simply not done enough to comply with the court orders. Her compliance efforts have been sluggish and disorganized although she has certainly had enough time to comply with the orders. If at any time in the five years since the last orders were entered Defendant felt that she would be unable to comply, she should have sought relief from the court. Star Financial Services, Inc. v. Aastar Mortgage, 89 F.3d 5, 14 (1st Cir. 1996). At no time has she done so.
Substantial Compliance
A party against whom civil contempt sanctions are sought is not held to absolute compliance with the orders. Morales Feliciano, 697 F.Supp. at 35. If a party has taken all reasonable steps within its power to insure compliance with the orders, that party ought not to be held in contempt. Id. citing Washington Metropolitan v. Amalgamated Transit, 531 F.2d 617, 621 (D.C.Cir.1976); Sekaquaptewa v. MacDonald, 544 F.2d 396, 406 (9th Cir. 1976); See also Langton v. Johnston, 928 F.2d 1206, 1220 (1st Cir.1991). Under the theory of substantial compliance, "if a violating party shows that it has taken `all reasonable steps' to comply with the court order, technical or inadvertent violations of the order will not support a finding of contempt." General Signal Corp. v. Donallco, Inc., 787 F.2d 1376, 1379 (9th Cir. 1986); see also Food Lion v. United Food and Commercial Workers International Union, 103 F.3d 1007, 1017 (D.C.Cir.1997); Glover v. Johnson, 934 F.2d 703 (6th Cir. 1991); Morales Feliciano, 697 F.Supp. at 35. In the present case there was no "technical or inadvertent violation". Defendant has simply failed to comply.
That a party has reached the level of "substantial compliance" necessary to shield her from contempt sanctions 787 depends on the circumstances of each case, *787 including the nature of the interest at stake and the degree to
which non-compliance affects that interest. Fortin, 692 F.2d at 795. In the present case, the interest at stake 0907 protecting inmates from cruel and unusual punishment 0907 is of great importance. This makes the consequences of non-compliance very serious. Notwithstanding, at the hearings Defendant presented more of what this court has heard for years throughout the troublesome history of this litigation.

Plaintiffs have demonstrated gross excesses in both capacity and duration. Defendant, on the other hand, failed to establish that she undertook any affirmative efforts to alleviate the problems of overcrowding and prolonged detentions. To make matters worse, virtually nothing was done to rectify the appalling environmental, health and security conditions caused by the overcrowding in those cells until long after Plaintiffs had moved to hold Defendant in contempt. Such behavior further reveals a general institutional apathy towards the spirit and letter of this court's orders. Evidence demonstrates that the problems continued as of October of 1999.
Assertions of good faith efforts to comply are irrelevant. It is well established that intent is not an issue in civil contempt proceedings. McComb, 336 U.S. at 191, 69 S.Ct. 497 ("The absence of wilfulness does not relieve from civil contempt"); Fortin, 692 F.2d at 796-97 ("Good faith alone is not a defense to civil contempt"). Defendant has failed to comply with the district court's order and has failed to present a valid defense. Thus, Defendant is in contempt for violating this courts orders regarding admission cells.
There is no legal impediment to a finding of contempt against administrator Zoe Laboy. As AOC Administrator, she is charged with a duty to monitor the progress of compliance with this Courts orders. The Court finds that the Administrator knew or should have known about the widespread failures to comply with this Courts Orders and that she failed to take the necessary steps to insure compliance.
Additionally, the Court finds that Defendant failed to comply with this Courts' orders regarding notification to the court when opening new facilities and the filing of a staffing report for those facilities. As was the case with court orders regarding admissions cells, these orders were clear and unambiguous. Yet, Defendant ignored the Court's mandates.
Plaintiffs detained in admissions cells suffered serious mental and physical harm. Uncontroverted expert and inmate testimony firmly established that inmates were detained in small areas under obscenely unhygienic and mentally distressing conditions for prolonged periods of time. They were placed at an excessive risk to both their health and security. They were deprived of sleep and suffered muscle pains and spasms. They were unreasonably and unnecessarily exposed to serious and dangerous communicable diseases. They were harmed psychologically by the deplorable incarceration conditions. Inmates were deprived of basic necessities of life. They were stripped of their dignity.
Wherefore, the Court holds Defendant in contempt for violating this Court's Orders. Although Plaintiffs have suggested that the Court impose a fine equal to that one calculated utilizing the stipulated fines in the Revised Stipulation, this Court has previously stated that
"The court interprets the Revised Stipulation as permitting the court, upon a finding of noncompliance, to impose the non-appealable fine agreed to by the parties, to decline to do so, or to impose a coercive fine in a different amount, so long as the amount does not exceed what the stipulation provides for. Any such determination by the court will be final and non-appealable by either party"
(Dkt.5429).
788 *788 Because the Court feels that imposing the stipulated fines would be excessive[11], the Court opts to impose a different fine than that one stipulated by the parties. Defendant is thus ORDERED to deposit with the Court the amount of $10,000,000.00 (TEN MILLION DOLLARS). The Court deems this amount as sufficient to ameliorate the admission cell situation. The fine will be used exclusively to alleviate confinement conditions at Ponce Fase III and Bayamón 308 admission cells.
It is further ORDERED that within one hundred and twenty (120) days of the entry of this Opinion and Order Defendant and Plaintiffs shall submit to the Court a joint proposal detailing specifically how to resolve the admission cell situation. This proposal shall discuss possible admission cell construction or reconstruction alternatives including the construction of toilets and sinks within the admission cells; Security needs including cell configuration and the hiring, training and payment to security personnel designated to admission cell areas; Sanitary needs including the hiring of cleaning staff, and the development of program of sanitation to regularly clean the cells (at least once every twenty-four hours) and inmate clothing. The proposal shall include a detailed

time-line for development and implementation. It shall include a discussion of any other pertinent issues which Defendant or Plaintiffs deem proper for the improvement of the admission cell situation.
It is further ORDERED that within sixty (60) days of the entry of this Opinion and Order the Administrator of Corrections will submit a report to the Court, served upon counsel for the parties, informing the Court on the progress or obstacles the proposal is encountering. Plaintiffs are welcomed, but not ordered, to submit comments regarding the proposal at the time the Administrator has been ordered to do so.
The implementation of the proposal is, of course, subject to approval by this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED
[1] For clarity reasons holding pens, detention cells and admission cells will be collectively referred as admission cells.
[2] The paragraph reads "3. Detention Cells, Holding Pens, and Admission Cells:
a. In the event that defendant's, after June 30, 1994, house prisoners in a detention cell, holding pen, or admission cell in excess of the capacity established by the Court's prior orders, and this condition continues for more than 8 hours, defendant's will be deemed to be in violation of the capacity provisions affecting such cells or holding areas. If a capacity violation persists for more than twenty-four hours, defendants will pay a fine in the amount of $600 per prisoner, per day, for each subsequent day, or portion thereof, any such violation continues.
For the purpose of this sub-paragraph, a day is defined as each twenty four hour period commencing after the first twenty four hours of any capacity violation. The fines will be calculated on the basis of the highest count of inmates in a cell during any such period.
b. In the event that defendants, after June 30, 1994, house a prisoner in a detention cell, holding pen, or admission cell beyond the length of time permitted by the Court's prior orders, the defendant's will be deemed to be violation of the time limit provision affecting such cells or holding areas. If such a time-limit violation persists for more than 24 hours, defendants will pay a fine in the amount $100 per prisoner for each subsequent hour, or portion thereof, any such violation continues.
The parties recognize that an inmate can be held in an admission cell, holding pen or detention cell at the established capacity for up to twenty four hours. The parties also recognize that, in an emergency, defendants may house more prisoners that the established capacity in such cells, but only up to eight hours. Thus, the period during which the defendant's will be deemed to be in violation of the time limit provision will depend upon whether or not inmates are housed at capacity."
[3] For example, health officials can't possibly determine instantly whether an inmate is HIV positive. HIV testing, as well as testing for other infectious diseases, simply takes time.
[4] As discussed in the previous section, this Court specifically charged Defendants to observe admission cell capacities, not to house inmates for more than 24 hours in admission cells and to provide inmates with constant supervision to assure their hygienic and security needs.
[5] Defendants make much of the fact that some cells in the medical area were "waiting areas," for inmates awaiting medical appointments. The Court is convinced that these so called waiting areas were at some point converted into admission cells. They essentially served the same purpose. Any cell used for temporary detention or holding purposes falls within the purview of the order limiting the use of "admission cells, holding pens, or detention cells," regardless of what AOC staff may call those cells. The name of the cell doesn't change its function.
[6] "La oficina de cumplimineto" or "office of compliance" was established by AOC to overlook the institution's compliance with this Court's orders.

[7] The phrase "without any type of movement" is a direct translation from what the report actually states 0907 "De los ciento once (111) reclusos, ciento cinco (105) llevan más de veinticuatro (24) horas en las celdas sin ningún tipo de movimiento".
[8] The report's actual words are "un exceso de veinticuatro (24) más que la capacidad para lo que fueron dise&ncaron;adas. Constituyendose éste en un claro y punitivo hacinamiento".
[9] During the evidentiary hearing the Court granted leave to plaintiffs to submit further evidence regarding the issue of cell overcrowding and prolonged stays. The record was left open. Subsequently, Plaintiffs submitted numerical evidence demonstrating admission cell overcrowding and prolonged stays during the period of April 23, 1999 to October of 1999.
[10] As noted in the beginning of this Opinion and Order, the Orders of the Court came about as a result of negotiations and stipulations carried out by Plaintiffs and Defendants.
[11] Plaintiffs suggest that the Court impose a fine in the amount of $51,232,100.00 for violations occurring in the period of June 6, 1997 to March 12, 1998. $45,121,100.00 of these fines pertain to duration violations while $6,111,000.00 concern excess capacity violations. These figures were calculated using the formula stipulated by the parties of in the Revised Stipulation. (Pls. Ex. 11, 12 and 13).
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

CARLOS MORALES FELICIANO, et al,
Plaintiffs, v.
LUIS FORTUÑO BURSET, et al, Defendants.

Civil No. 79-4(PG)

OPINION AND ORDER

"[I]t is impossible for a written opinion to convey the

pernicious conditions and the pain and degradation which

ordinary inmates suffer within [unconstitutionally operated

prisons]. . . . For those who are incarcerated within [such

prisons], these conditions and experiences form the content and

essence of daily existence. It is to these conditions that each

inmate must wake every morning; it is with the painful knowledge

of their existence that each inmate must try to sleep at night.

But these iniquitous and distressing circumstances are

prohibited by the great constitutional principles that no human

being, regardless of how disfavored by society, shall be

subjected to cruel and unusual punishment or be deprived of the

due process of the law within the United States of America.

Regrettably, state officials have not upheld their

responsibility to enforce these principles. 1

In the wake of

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) their default, the United States Constitution must be enforced . . . by court decree." Ruiz v. Estelle, 503 F.Supp. 1265, 1391 (S.D. Tex. 1980).
INTRODUCTION & BACKGROUND Deficiencies in Administration of Corrections' (hereinafter "AOC") food service, food storage, food sanitation and food safety have existed since the inception of this case. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 497 F. Supp. 14, 30-34 (D. Puerto Rico 1980). At that time, the Court entered orders relating to food sanitation and the provision of special diets when medically necessary. Id. at 84-86. In 1986, the Court found that conditions in the AOC's prison system continued to violate the U.S. Constitution (Docket No. 868), and entered an order appointing Court Monitors to assess Defendants' compliance with the Court's order of 1980 and to propose a detailed remedial order to correct unconstitutional conditions in AOC prisons (Docket No. 869). Under a stipulation between the parties entered into (Docket No. 981) and approved by the Court in 1987 (Docket No. 1044), the Defendants agreed to file various plans designed to remedy unconstitutional conditions of confinement within the correctional system, including a plan pertaining to general environmental health and sanitation. (Id.).
2

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) Defendants filed such a plan, in which they committed
themselves to the development and maintenance of certain minimum standards in the area of environmental health and sanitation, including food service and safety. (Docket No. 1102, Ex. 10). This Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan, as it later came to be known, was revised with the input of experts consulted by the Court Monitor and agency administrators; agency personnel were identified and appointed by the AOC and trained to carry out the plan; and the plan was ultimately approved by the Court and incorporated into the orders in this case on 30 March 1990. (Docket No. 1786, 2137).
The requirements of the plan were fairly specific. With respect to food service, the ultimately approved Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan required, among others, that menu plans meeting minimum nutritional requirements should be approved by a licensed dietitian, that inmates who suffer from medical conditions requiring dietary restrictions be provided appropriate special meals; that food storage areas be hygienic and temperature controlled, that food temperature be properly maintained to avoid the growth of bacteria and other pathogens, that food storage and serving containers, food utensils and temperature control food transport equipment be in good condition, access to hot water in food preparation and cleaning
3

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) areas, the maintenance of thermometers in order to monitor the adequacy of temperatures in all areas of food service (storage, cooking, serving and cleaning), and that food services comply with all applicable present and future regulations of the Puerto Rico Department of Health. (Docket No. 1786, Article 15 (also labeled Sections 24.0-32.0).
In 1997, after determining that the record in this case required updating, the Court appointed an expert witness under F.R.E. 706. The Court selected Vincent M. Nathan, who at that time had been designated by the parties as a “Joint Compliance Consultant”, see Order Granting Joint Motion Requesting Vacation of Order of Reference, etc. (Docket No. 6234). The Court directed Mr. Nathan to produce two reports, the first to assess the current state of affairs with respect to correctional health care, and the second to report on the status of conditions of confinement in the areas of crowding and population control, environmental conditions, fire safety, the facilities rehabilitation program, security, staffing, personnel management, inmate discipline, use of force, classification, and “inmate management.” This second report was filed on 15 July 1997 (Docket No. 6604). Mr. Nathan, in his report, concluded that the Administration of Correction still was not providing constitutional conditions of confinement to its penal
4

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) population. Memorializing widespread violations in virtually every area of correctional operations, Mr. Nathan concluded that only the appointment of a receiver to oversee and run the Administration of Correction would be sufficient to remedy the deficiencies he found. (Id.)
Lengthy hearings on Mr. Nathan's Report concerning all areas of correctional operations, took place beginning in January 1999, and evidence was presented, inter alia, that the AOC was still doing an unsatisfactory job with food preparation including, improper storage of food leading to spoiled food in storage areas, inadequate temperature maintenance, improper cleaning of food service trays and utensils, a failure to provide special diets for inmates with medical conditions, and unavailability of hot and clean water. (Docket No. 7478). After the presentation of this evidence, both parties made proposals regarding the type of remedy to be entered. Plaintiffs proposed the appointment of a technical advisor to assist the Court in providing a comprehensive and long term plan to achieve administrative and operational efficiency at the AOC and to clarify the remedial structure in this case. (Docket Nos. 7339, 7341, 7451, 7513). Rejecting Defendants' proposals at the time as unviable and viewing Plaintiffs proposal as a less intrusive alternative to the receivership recommended by
5

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

the Court's expert, Vince Nathan, the Court adopted Plaintiffs

proposed remedy in July of 2000. (Docket Nos. 7478, 7661).

A little more than a year later, in December of 2001,

Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Prospective Injunctive Relief for

failure to deliver adequate food services to members of the

Plaintiff Class in Violation of their Constitutional Rights.

(Docket No. 8110, 8116). This motion was opposed by Defendants.

(Docket Nos. 8133, 8137, 8139, 8156, 8161). The Court later

granted Plaintiffs' "urgent" motion to consolidate hearings on

the food services issue with other pending hearings in the case.

(Docket No. 8203). Plaintiffs and Defendants engaged in

negotiations to attempt to resolve these issues without the need

for a hearing. (Docket No. 8270).

The parties later filed a joint compliance plan which

addressed, among others, the food services issue. (Docket No.

8271). With respect to food services the joint plan provided

that the AOC would outsource the provision of "complete food

services for inmates," which should provide special diets as

medically prescribed. (Id.). The AOC would also develop a new

Manual of Rules and Procedures for the Food Services Program.

(Id.).

A report evaluating the AOC's food service and

distribution facilities would be submitted to the Court within

6

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) 45 days of the approval of the compliance plan. (Docket No. 8278).
In approving the plan in August of 2002, the Court noted that "the joint Compliance Plan offers a new hope that Defendants are prepared at this time to undertake the long overdue task of providing constitutional conditions of confinement to members of the plaintiff class, at least in the areas of environmental health and food services.” (Docket No. 8283).
In October of 2002, the Court's technical advisor rendered a detailed system wide assessment of the areas of correctional operations relevant to this case. (Docket No. 8321). In its Assessment of Administration of Corrections Ancillary Services, the technical advisor documented the following observations, findings and recommendations regarding the food services offered by the AOC's existing fifteen (15) kitchens, among others:
• kitchens built to feed a fairly small number of inmates now routinely prepare meals for as many as ten times that number;
• little or no use made of recipes in preparing meals, with limited supervision of meal preparation by qualified supervisors;
7

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) • inadequate medical diets - food service personnel
generally provide low-salt, low-fat fare as the "special" diet for all prescriptions;
• little or no regard for portion control, to ensure that inmates receive adequate amounts of food;
• pots and pans rinsed with a hose and without detergent because dishwashers are either broken or were never installed;
• unsanitary containers and vehicles used to transport meals from kitchens to inmates;
• containers that do not maintain adequate temperature control, possibly exposing inmates and staff to bacteria or food poisoning;
• deteriorated facilities that make proper sanitation and safe food handling all but impossible.
• generally unsanitary conditions in kitchens during food preparation;
• containers used to transport meals that emanated foul smells and did not hold food temperatures effectively;
• vehicles transporting meals that were infested with cockroaches;
• kitchen facilities not only infested with roaches but also with flies;
8

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) • AOC should adopt and follow industry standards for all
aspects of its food service operations; • the director of Food Service and Nutrition has only
one employee to help her oversee a food service operation that prepares meals for about 17,000 inmates and 8,500 corrections workers three times a day, 365 days a year.
• The Director of Food Service and Nutrition and a regional dietitian make up the central program staff, although only the director is located in the central office. The regional dietitian is located in the southern region but works under the director's supervision.
• Central Food Service Staff simply do not have the resources needed to manage such a complex and decentralized operation. AOC's kitchen supervisors should be accountable to unit wardens for operating kitchens in line with adopted industry standards. The director of Food Services and Nutrition would continue to oversee AOC's overall food service operations, but her role would change somewhat. The director would serve as a contract manager for the arrangement resulting from AOC's effort to outsource the management of its facility food service operations. She also should continue working . . .to prepare nutritionally sound menus and ensure that special diets prescribed by medical personnel meet the appropriate guidelines.
9

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) Finally, the director would be charged with ensuring that all AOC kitchens prepare food based on the nutritional guidelines required by industry standards.
• One of the biggest hurdles facing the Food Service and Nutrition Program is its inability to control its own budget. . . . [I]f program personnel wish to make a decision that involves an expenditure, they must make a request through the director, who forwards it to AOC's Budget Office. The program must then wait, often for months, for an answer to its request, and the eventual answer often is "no."
• Food Services and Nutrition does not have a planning process for its equipment, budgetary or facilities needs. This is a recipe for disaster. It has saddled the program with inadequate or broken equipment and an unsafe, unsanitary environment. AOC should . . . . plan for future budget and equipment needs.
After rendering its detailed assessment on the AOC's Infrastructure and Management, the technical advisor was released from duty. (Docket No. 8322).
In January of 2003, Defendants requested that the Court fund the technical advisor in a new capacity, as a management consultant to the AOC for the implementation of its recommendations. (Docket 8368). Upon Plaintiffs' acquiescence
10

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) (Docket 8369) the Court acceded to this request (Docket 8382, 9052, 9068). That arrangement has since been terminated. All the efforts described, which were meant to be comprehensive, apparently never had any noticeable effect on the provision of food services, as can be seen below.
A few months after the technical advisor in this case became a management consultant to the AOC, in December of 2003, Plaintiffs filed a Motion for Order to Show Cause why Defendants should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with the compliance plan regarding the delivery of adequate food services. (Docket No. 8582). This Motion was not opposed by Defendants and evidentiary hearings were held on the matter. (Docket No. 8715-21, 8726-28, 8744-47, 8752.)
In October 2004, the Court found that unconstitutionally inadequate food services continued to be the norm at the AOC. (Docket No. 8764.) At the hearing, the Secretary of Corrections had testified before the Court that four attempts to outsource the delivery of food services through the state's bidding process had been unsuccessful and an emergency order had to be issued in order to execute a contract between the AOC and Canteen Correctional Services, a private food service provider. (Id.) The contract between Canteen and the AOC was completed before the Court entered an order of the matter, and as a
11

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) result, the Court did not hold the Secretary in contempt regarding that issue but required the he submit a report within 30 days on the progress with respect to the delivery of adequate food services as well as a report establishing an oversight and supervision program regarding the services provided by Canteen. (Id.).
It was not long before Plaintiffs had filed a Motion to Order Defendant Secretary of Corrections Hon. Miguel Pereira Castillo to Show Cause Why He Should Not Be Held in Contempt of Court arguing that unconstitutional conditions still prevailed in the area of food service and safety at AOC institutions (Docket No. 8790, 8816, 8819). Since the AOC was then in the process of making the transition to a contracted food service provider, Defendants requested that the Court's consideration of the contempt motion be held in abeyance (Docket No. 8816), and the matter was never litigated before the Court.
On 8 February 2010, plaintiffs filed a Motion to Order Defendant Hon. Carlos Molina Rodríguez to Show Cause Why He Should Not Be Held in Contempt for Failure to Comply With the Court's Orders Regarding Food Services (Docket No. 9720) (hereinafter "Motion for Contempt,") which is the subject of this Opinion and Order. In that motion Plaintiffs denounced the continued deficiencies in food services, averring that food
12

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) service at the AOC did not pass constitutional muster. This Court set the matter for a hearing (Docket No. 9729). Despite requesting (Docket No. 9726) and being granted (Docket No. 9732) an enlargement of time in which to file their response to Plaintiffs Motion for Contempt, Defendants later purposefully opted to not file any response (Docket No. 9740) a move which was opposed by Plaintiffs (Docket No. 9741). This generalized paralysis in mounting any kind of serious defense to the contempt motion continued throughout the hearing (Tr. Day 5 at 87-90) which overwhelmingly established the unconstitutional conditions complained of.
Prior to the hearing the parties attempted to reach a negotiated stipulation which would address the various area of noncompliance. (Docket No. 9777). These negotiations were unsuccessful. (Tr. Day 1). Evidence was thus heard on the matter on May 4, 5, 6, 7 and 10, 2010. At these hearings, Plaintiffs presented the testimony of 13 witnesses, including inmates currently in the custody of the Administration of Corrections, Luis Quiñones Santiago, Alex Agosto Perez, Carmen Iris Alicea Rivera, Luis Rivera Rivera, Carlos Martes Morales, María Noriega Hostos, Emilio Fuentes Santana, Peter Jiménez Hernández, the Secretary of the Corrections Department, Carlos Molina Rodríguez, the Administration of Corrections' Director of
13

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) Food Services, Frances Cruz Rosado, two members of the Correction Department's bid board, María Marcano Guerra and Esdras Vélez Rodríguez, and an expert in nutrition, diets and food security, Elba López Pérez, and submitted voluminous documentary exhibits demonstrating the extent of Defendants’ violations of this Court’s orders, and their knowledge of and deliberate indifference to constitutional violations in the areas of food services and safety.
Defendants presented two witnesses, Carmen Ortiz Luna, the Administration of Corrections' Dietician Services Coordinator, and José Luis Mercado Valle, a monitor of the Administration of Corrections' Office of Compliance and Operational Review.
THE CURRENT STATE OF FOOD SERVICES AND SAFETY AT THE ADMINISTRATION OF CORRECTIONS
In spite of the detailed orders, stipulations, plans, programs, manuals, systems, trainings, policies, procedures and timetables implemented throughout the thirty year history of this case, adequate food is still not supplied to the Plaintiff Class and food service continues to represent an unreasonable risk to the health of its members. (Tr. Day 5 at 85-86). One of the reasons for this is that, despite investing in the time and effort to create a Food Services Manual, a comprehensive manual which was designed by the AOC pursuant to the orders of
14

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) this Court (Docket No. 8271, 8278), the AOC does not bother to follow it (Ex. 7 & 37, Tr. Day 4 at 80-81). The AOC also does not comply with its Evaluation and Compliance Plan (Ex. 1, Tr. Day 2, 89-96, 108-110, 128-129, Day 4 80-81), also designed pursuant to the orders of this Court (Docket No. 8764), which would allow it to effectively supervise compliance with the food service contract between the AOC and Canteen.
In reaching these conclusions the Court relies heavily on the report and testimony of Plaintiffs expert, Ms. Elba López Pérez, a nutritionist who was qualified as an expert in nutrition, diets and food security. Ms. Elba López Pérez has a bachelors degree in nutrition dietetics and has additional education experience in food service training, hospital food service and clinical nutrition from Puerto Rico's Department of Health, and over twenty years of experience as a nutritionist and dietitian. (Ex. 36, Tr. Day 4 at 45-46). She has a license from the examining board for health professionals of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. (Ex. 36, Tr. Day 4 at 45). She has ample experience in food service in institutional settings, specifically hospitals, and in the development of food service procedures, guidelines, protocols and regulations. (Ex. 36, Tr. Day 4 at 46-56, Ex. 36). She also holds a private practice since 1999 up to the present day. (Ex. 36).
15

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) Ms. López’ inspections of AOC kitchens were carried out
between October of 2008 and June of 2009. Despite the Secretary's protestations that food service has significantly improved during his tenure (Tr. Day 2 at 32, 53, 68), Ms. López Perez’s findings during visits made in June 2009 were essentially consistent with her findings months in late 2008 (Ex. 37). Moreover, based on her evaluation of the testimony presented at the contempt hearings, Ms. López Pérez opined that the conditions which she found when she visited AOC institutions were still present. (Tr. Day 4 at 104). She further opined that said conditions, existing both at the time of her visits and at the time of the contempt hearings, jeopardize inmate health (Tr. Day 4 at 81-82, Day 5 at 85-86).
Ms. López Pérez' testimony in this regard was essentially uncontested.1 Other than making some generalized and conclusory assertions to the contrary, Defendants presented no expert testimony and no other evidence that the state of affairs was anything other than consistent with the picture painted by Ms. López Pérez. In fact, Defendants barely mounted any Defense at all. (Tr. Day 6). Defendants did present evidence that in the
1 Defendants presented the testimony of AOC nutritionist Ms. Carmen Ortiz Luna to oppose some conclusions of the Plaintiffs Class’ expert nutritionist. Ms. Ortiz, however, was not qualified as an expert by the Court. Her testimony, therefore, cannot be given any relevant weight as an opposition to the well founded expert opinions of Ms. Elba López Pérez.
16

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) weeks preceding the hearing they had made a large purchase of new serving equipment for AOC's food service operations and some repairs (Tr. Day 2 at 23-24, 87-88, Day 6 at 67-78, Ex. C), evidence which is discussed and considered below. While these are not insignificant developments, recent improvement is essentially the only “defense” that was presented for the Court's consideration. The Defendants intimated that they had developed a remedial plan to address food service deficiencies. No evidence of this remedial plan was presented and its existence was only referred to in the most oblique and general terms. (Tr. Day 2 at 69-70, Day 5 at 89-90). As a result, this Court cannot conclude that the supposed "plan" in any way mitigates the findings made here. We are left then, with the purchase of serving equipment and some recent repairs as defendants’ only defense. As will be seen below, serving a penal population of over 12,000 inmates involves many aspects other than equipment. Defendants fell very short of opposing the Plaintiff Class’ evidence pinpointing deficiencies in all areas of correctional food service.
Food Receipt and Storage: Beginning with each institution's receipt of food, no procedure is in place for inspecting food received, ensuring that it is delivered to the AOC at adequate temperatures, cataloguing it and labeling it to reduce the risk
17

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) of inadvertent spoilage or passing of expiration dates. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 91-94, Day 5 at 6, 23-25). Almost uniformly, foods are not appropriately labeled to identify expiration dates, and so, when the food is used there is no way to know if the food has expired (Ex. 33, 37, Tr. Day 4 at 79). At times the food stored in AOC's food storage areas is already expired (Tr. Day 2 at 31-32, 37-38, Ex. 2, 33, 37) and in one case, Plaintiff’s expert witness discovered that the institution actually received the food after it had expired. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 79, 97-98).
Food storage is itself inadequate, as refrigerators, freezers and dry storage areas are in disrepair and fail to comply with temperature and humidity requirements. (Ex. 30(24)(8), 31(14)(21-24), 33, 37, Tr. Day 4 at 79, Day 5 at 20-23).2 This has the potential to spoil or reduce the useful life of food. (Ex. 28(15), 37, Tr. Day 4 at 83). Dry foods are stored on wooden platforms, which are prohibited by the AOC's own Food Services Manual since those platforms encourage infestation with insects and the growth of bacteria which can cause food to spoil. (Ex. 28(25), 37).
2 The parties stipulated the photos taken by the Plaintiff Class to reflect conditions as of October 2009.
18

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) Food is placed in storage areas without rhyme or reason,
often contributing to the ruining of food. (Ex. 27(26), 31(26)(28)(29)). Once stored, there is no system in place to ensure that food is used within a reasonable period of time in order to avoid food spoilage or deterioration prior to use. (Tr. Day 4, 79, 94, Day 5 at 24-26, 86). This lowers the quality and nutritional value of the food. (Tr. Day 5 at 6).
All of the above would be a less serious problem if it merely resulted in waste, but spoiled foods actually reach the inmate population for consumption: moldy bread and cheese, "greenish" chicken, ham and hot dogs, fermented canned fruits and apple sauce, and foul smelling meats are actually served to the penal population. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 3 at 71). The Secretary of Corrections himself testified that he had observed food with expired dates being served to inmates at AOC institutions he had visited. (Tr. Day 2 at 31-32, 37-38, Ex. 2).
Adequate Temperatures: There is no monitoring of cooking temperatures (Tr. Day 4 at 78, 84-85), so food often arrives to the penal population frozen, raw or undercooked. (Tr. Day 3 at 58-59, Day 4 at 15, Day 5 at 10-11, Ex. 11, 16, 17, 37). In the case of raw or undercooked animal products this is considered potentially hazardous since adequate cooking temperatures are required in order to kill or eliminate viruses, bacteria,
19

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) parasites and other toxins which can cause food borne illnesses. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 3 at 69-72, 81-83)
Hot food items should be maintained at 135̊ F or more and cold food items should be maintained at 41̊ F or less up to the time that they are actually served for consumption in order to destroy and inhibit the growth of microorganisms which cause food borne illness.3 (Ex. 33, 37, Tr. Day 3 at 69-72, 81-82, Day 4 at 82-83, Day 5 at 9-10, 50-51). The AOC's Food Services Manual requires that the AOC's food service adhere to the Food Code of the Food and Drug Administration which contains this requirement, and independently requires that hot food items be maintained at 135̊ F or more and cold food items should be maintained at 41̊ F or less (Ex. 7, Tr. Day 6, 52-56). However, the AOC does not actually measure the temperature of food at the time it is served to the consumer and those temperature requirements, in fact, are not complied with. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 11-13, 78, 95-97, Day 5 at 58-62, 64-78).
One of the reasons that temperature requirements are not complied with is that equipment which is used to maintain food temperatures such as thermoses, insulated trays, thermal carts,
3 One of Defendants’ witnesses, Ms. Carmen Ortiz Luna, who, as mentioned, was not qualified as an expert, argued that it was acceptable to serve foods within four hours of having been at these required temperatures but provided no evidence to support this contention. (Tr. Day 6, 38-46, 52-56)
20

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) and steam tables have been either unavailable or damaged so that food is not maintained at adequate temperatures. (Ex. 33, 37, Tr. Day 4 at 94-95, 98-99, Day 5 at 29-40). This was true until a very recent purchase of such equipment by the Secretary of Corrections. (Tr. Day 2, 23-5, 87-88). The sequence of events in this matter follows a typical pattern: A particular longstanding problem is suddenly acknowledged and the Defendants make some grand gesture which is superficially directed at the problem but which does not comprehensively and squarely address it. Such efforts often come at the eleventh hour, in an effort to avoid liability under a contempt motion made by Plaintiffs.
Despite stating that the sad state of affairs in AOC food service was a priority to him (Tr. Day 2 at 23), the Secretary of Corrections who was appointed in January of 2009 (Tr. Day 2 at 22) did not undertake to replace this equipment until almost a year later (Tr. Day 2 at 23-24, 26, 87-89), in spite of the fact that the lack of appropriate equipment has been an enduring problem4 which predates his tenure as Secretary of Corrections. (Tr. Day 2 at 122-123, 125-128, Ex. 5B, 5C, 9A, 37). It may be no mistake that the purchase of the new equipment roughly
4 The evidence on record establishes that, prior to this purchase, the need to replace and repair food service equipment and implements were understood and reported to the AOC’s central office for years without any help being forthcoming. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 2 at 122-123, 125-128).
21

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) coincides with the filing of Plaintiffs contempt motion. (Tr. Day 2 at 22-28, 87-89, 123, Day 3 at 89).
As mentioned, the lack of such properly functioning equipment prevents the maintenance of safe food temperatures and increases the risk of contamination and lack of adequate sanitation. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 5 at 40-43). Without this properly functioning equipment, thermal carts are tied with rope because their latches do not close properly. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 79). Insulated trays without covers get covered with the bottom of another tray so that a stack of trays is formed with only one cover on top. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 5 at 40-44). In some cases the trays, carts and thermoses have been so deteriorated that their insulation is exposed and becomes polluted with food residue, dirt and humidity, which, aside from making them foul smelling, increases the likelihood of contaminating the foods and beverages placed in them. (Ex. 15, 17, 25-31, 37, Tr. Day 4 at 79-80). The lack of sufficient utensils, insulated trays and cups (Ex. 33) being provided to inmates results in such implements being shared amongst several people, cleaned only by rinsing in the showers of the living areas between uses, without soap or adequate sanitizing cleanser. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 3 at 91, Tr. Day 4 at 28-30). The Secretary of Corrections' observation that this type of equipment was "not in the best of conditions,
22

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) that the cleaning of that equipment was not the best" (Tr. Day 2 at 23, 78-79) is clearly a colossal understatement.
Even at the time of hearing, the AOC had still not received all of the equipment it had ordered, specifically the insulated trays, in anticipation of managing the food services issue even though this type of equipment is usually received within six to eight weeks after being ordered. (Tr. Day 2, 24-25, 27-28, 8789). Moreover, the AOC failed to purchase any new steam tables (Tr. Day 5, 84-85) which were identified at hearing as crucial for maintaining adequate food temperatures. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 79, Day 5 at 29-31, 40-43, 66, 69-70). Apparently there is no plan to purchase these. (Tr. Day 2 at 142-143).
Although the recent purchase of new equipment should assist the AOC in ameliorating some of the problems with food service, the replacement of these damaged items can be only part of the solution. (Tr. Day 4 at 22-23). In the first place, the AOC's inability to maintain adequate food temperatures is not solely attributable to the lack of proper equipment. Such equipment, even when it is in good working order, must also be used properly to maintain adequate temperatures, and it is not. (Tr. Day 5 at 40-44, 52-53, 67-68).
Moreover, the inability to maintain proper food temperatures is also caused by the fact that only a handful of
23

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) kitchens, now fourteen (14) in total, service all AOC penal institutions (Tr. Day 6 at 7), with over 12,000 prisoners. (Tr. Day 2 at 66, Day 4 at 22-23). Food must be taken from kitchens to many different dining areas and inmate living areas (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 3 at 47-48, 66, 78, 87, 92-93, Day 4 at 25-26, Day 5 at 52-53). Due to this and to poor planning, as well as the lack of proper equipment, long delays between the time that food is prepared and the time the food actually reaches the inmates’ hands contribute to the inadequate maintenance of food temperatures. (Ex. 37). Carmen Ortiz Luna, the AOC Dietitian Services Coordinator testified that the goal is that food be delivered "as fast as possible," specifying that food should be delivered within two and three hours from the time it is served. (Tr. Day 6 at 35-36). This goal, however, is based on the assumption that the food does not actually have to be maintained at adequate temperatures during this time (Tr. Day 6 at 38-40), which is contrary to the expert evidence presented in the case. (Ex. 37).
More to the point, the onetime purchase of new equipment, like the one time repair of refrigeration or other equipment (Tr. Day 6 at 76), does nothing to prevent this issue from arising again in the not so distant future. The evidence in this case is that much of the shortage of equipment and damage
24

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) to the equipment has been longstanding (Tr. Day 2 at 123, Ex. 5B, 5C, 9A, 37) and that the recent purchases of new equipment were undertaken in anticipation of litigation on the issue by the Plaintiffs (Tr. Day 2 at 22-28, 87-89, 123, Day 3 at 89). The Court was particularly struck by the testimony of the AOC Director of Food Services when she thanked God in open Court that, finally new equipment "could" be purchased. (Tr. Day 2 at 128).
Based on the history of this case and even on the very evidence presented at the hearing, this Court finds that the problem of hopelessly damaged equipment going unaddressed is highly likely if not inevitable without Court action. The new equipment will doubtless suffer wear and tear, especially if it is not handled properly. In particular, the Court is mindful of the fact that several of the dishwashing machines in the AOC kitchens do not work or do not work properly. (Ex. 9A, 37). If, as has been done in the past, the AOC resorts to cleaning these items "however they can" on the floor with a water hose, or worse, requiring inmates to clean them in showers (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 28-30), they are sure to deteriorate more quickly (Ex. 25(5)(9), 27(25), Tr. Day 3 at 72-73, 88-91, Tr. Day 4 at 4-5). Without any system in place to ensure that damaged or missing equipment is replaced on a regular basis, it is almost
25

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

inevitable that the same thing will happen again after a period

of time.

Cleaning: The conditions already described would

unacceptably increase the likelihood of food borne illnesses

even under clean conditions. Clean they are not. (Tr. Day 4 at

98-102, Ex. 37)

Kitchens themselves and food storage areas are unclean.

(Ex. 27(14)(15), 28(9), 30(1), Tr. Day 5 at 4-5). Hot running

water is not available for proper hand washing for food

handlers. (Tr. Day 5 at 79-80). Without adequate access to hot

running water or adequate dishwashing equipment (Tr. Day 4 at

98-101, Day 5 at 78-81) AOC kitchens resort to "cleaning,"

really rinsing, their wares with water hoses between uses, which

inadequately sanitizes them for use. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 3 at 68-

73, 88-89, 101, Day 4 at 100). Employees are not aware of how

to take apart the component pieces of certain equipment for

washing, resulting in residue remaining in parts of this

equipment which are exposed to food. (Ex. 17, 37, Tr. Day 4 at

98-99).

As already mentioned above, cracks and exposed

insulation in damaged thermoses, insulated trays and thermos

carts causes the trays to essentially become permanently

contaminated, causing these to remain smelly and unclean,

increasing the risk of contamination and bacterial growth. (Ex.

26

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) 37, Tr. Day 4 at 98-99). At any given mealtime, food residues from the previous meal can be found in the trays, demonstrating the lack of appropriate dishwashing and sanitation. (Ex. 15, 17, 19JJ-19LL, 37, Tr. Day 3 at 68, Day 4 at 99).
Vehicles used to transport food are not properly cleaned, sanitized or fumigated. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 80, 101, Day 5 at 18-19). They are also not appropriate for transporting food, since they are not fitted with belts to stabilize thermal food carts. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 101-102). As a result food becomes mixed and spills into the carts or on the floor of the vehicle, increasing the risk of future contamination as well as the likelihood of infestation by rodents and insects. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 4-5, 102). On occasion, food containers are placed directly on the dirty, rusty floor of the vehicle also causing food to be spilled with the attendant risk of making this equipment unsanitary and increasing the likelihood of infestation. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 4-5, 80, 102).
As a result of all of the conditions described above flies, cockroaches and worms might be found near food serving areas and equipment or actually in food served to inmates. (Tr. Day 3 at 96, Day 4 at 12, 15, 101-102, Day 5 at 4, 19, Ex. 5B, 17, 19, 37). This problem is clearly exacerbated when long periods go by without adequate fumigation. (Ex. 33). The increased
27

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) likelihood of contamination also leads to pieces of glass, wire and paper being found in food. (Ex. 37). Faced with inadequate food, members of the prison population can either eat it as is or go hungry. (Tr. Day 3 at 96).
Portions & Nutrition: Even above and beyond the inmates who, despite their hunger, cannot find it in themselves to eat spoiled or contaminated food (Tr. Day 3 at 96), the Court specifically finds that the AOC is systematically underfeeding the inmate population. (Ex. 33, 37). The lack of proper guidance from the central office in the form of standardized, uniform recipes and training regarding portion control results in noncompliance with the portion requirements established by the AOC's own food cycle. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 79). The failure to provide adequate portions is particularly true about protein sources and there seems to be some consensus that certain kinds of foods, are particularly susceptible to this problem, such as menus containing chicken parts, which contain more chicken bones than chicken meat and different types of soups, which contains more broth than actual pieces of food. (Ex. 37). In fact, the quantity of small and sharp chicken bones in food is so extreme as to be considered physical contamination, which constitutes a potential food security problem. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 85).
28

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

Commercially prepared single portion foods such as

hamburger patties and hot dogs do not comply with the food

portions established in the AOC's menu cycle (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4

at 85), so that every time these foods are served, those who

consume them are shortchanged. Other foods such as rice, stew

and vegetables are prepared in insufficient quantities resulting

in significantly smaller portions being served (Tr. Day 4 at 85-

87, Ex. 17) and leaving the last group to be served to simply go

without food because there is not enough to go around. (Ex. 37,

Tr. Day 4 at 15, 24-25, 26-27, 79, 87-88). This information was

confirmed by kitchen personnel as well as by correctional

officers. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 4 at 87-88). Some correctional

officers even reported that they felt obligated to share their

food with the inmates who were left without a meal. (Ex. 37).

The menu cycle established in the AOC's own Food Service

Manual is meant to comply with minimum nutritional standards.

(Ex. 7, Tr. Day 6, 8-12). The consistent failure to comply with

the quantities stipulated in the menu cycle, means that these

minimum requirements are not being met.

Going without

sufficient food for a day or two can be quite painful, but when

this goes on for months or years, malnutrition must become a

serious concern. See generally, Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678,

686-87 (1978) ("[T]he length of confinement cannot be ignored in

29

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) deciding whether the confinement meets constitutional standards. A filthy, overcrowded cell and a diet of 'grue' [providing 1000 calories a day] might be tolerable for a few days and intolerably cruel for weeks or months.")
Menu changes are not documented and are made without the adequate supervision of dietitians. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day 2 at 118121). In particular, the menu changes observed by Plaintiffs’ expert tended to lessen the amounts of vegetable portions and to generally lessen the variety of the food served, undercutting the nutritional adequacy of the food provided over time. (Ex. 37). Moreover the observed practice of overcooking food (Tr. Day 4 at 84-85, Ex. 16, 17, 19, 37), not to mention the serving of spoiled food, affects its nutritional content (Tr. Day 5 at 6) as well the palatability of the food provided to those confined in AOC institutions. (Ex. 37). Even the Secretary of Corrections recognized on one of his visits that the quality of the food that he observed was so poor, that he authorized the food to be sent back. (Tr. Day 2 at 37, 39).
Medically Ordered Diets: The food which is available for the provision of medically ordered diets is not adequate to meet medical orders. (Ex. 33 at 25). The line personnel who prepare modified diets clearly do not have the knowhow to follow medical orders with respect to special diets. (Ex. 5C, 9A, 37, Tr. Day
30

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

3 at 69-72, 79-84, Day 4 at 6-7, 79-80, 88-89, Day 5 at 15-16).

This is particularly true with respect to diabetic and renal

diets in which portion control is a key issue. (Ex. 37, Tr. Day

4 at 88-90, 104, Day 5 at 15-17). Moreover, medically ordered

diets are not promptly made available to inmates who need them

and often do not reach the inmate correctly prepared which often

results in the patient going without food for that meal. (Ex.

33, Tr. Day 3 at 71-72, 80-81, Day 4 at 6-7, 32-33). The

failure to follow such diets places these types of medical

patients at increased risk of serious health complications.

(Ex. 37).

On the other hand, it appears that in order to save time,

AOC’s correctional kitchens follow a one size fits all

specialized diet menu where there is one low fat, low sodium, no

irritant meal which is given to all inmates with a medical diet

order. (Ex.37, Tr. Day 4 at 32-33, Day 5 at 12-13)

Other special diets, such as diets designed to accommodate

religious dietary restrictions are also not provided. (Tr. Day 4

at 32-33). A Muslim prisoner testified regarding his experience

with food service. Muslims do not eat pork. This would seem a

simple enough dietary restriction to accommodate.

Upon

referring the matter to the AOC, he was served a low sodium, low

fat diet. On attempting to correct the situation, he was taken

31

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

off the "special diet," and now receives the same food as all

other members of the penal population, even when pork is on the

menu. For those meals, he must simply make do with what he can

from the other items on the menu. (Tr. Day 4 at 32-33). This

is emblematic of the robotic and inflexible quality of the

problem solving ability of the AOC. It may also be a symptom of

an overburdened kitchen which simply does not have the capacity

to meet even the most basic food service needs of the huge

population that it serves. (Tr. Day 4 at 32-24, Tr. Day 2 at

108).

At the end of 2008, upon the initiative of the AOC's

Dietitian Services Coordinator, a pilot program was begun at one

AOC institution to ensure that medically ordered diets were

properly complied with. (Tr. Day 2, 112-115, Ex. 5A). This

commendable effort apparently enjoyed some success, and it was

planned that it should be implemented at other institutions

within the AOC. However, no credible evidence regarding the

continued utilization of that program or its implementation at

other institutions was presented by Defendants.

(Tr. Day 2,

112-118, 130-132, Ex. 5B, Tr. Day 4 at 88-89, Day 5, 29-31).

32

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

Employees are poorly trained5 if they are trained at all and

are given inadequate guidance and supervision from the central

office. (Ex. 5C, 37, Tr. Day 4 at 80-81, 89-91, 105). They do

not correctly receive and store food, prepare sufficient

quantities, ensure that they are serving appropriate quantities,

clean food equipment, or prepare medically ordered diets.

(Id.).

Prison line personnel are either utterly dismissive or

openly hostile to prisoners' complaints and grievances regarding

food service matters. (Ex. 11C, 11E, 11I, 11L, 14C, 15O, 17E,

Tr. Day 3 at 96-100, Day 4 at 15-16, 24-25). One inmate was

told that he was not in a luxury hotel in response to his

grievance that he had received undercooked (still frozen) meat.

(Ex. 11L). In another case an inmate was placed in segregation

for repeatedly filing grievances relating to food service. (Tr.

Day 3 at 62-63).

Another inmate submitted a grievance

complaining that food trays used to serve food were filthy and

was told to talk to his fellow inmates who were the ones who

were charged with cleaning trays. (Tr. Day 3 at 68-69). In

another instance an inmate in charge of distributing food was

5 With respect to training and training materials, Plaintiffs expert was advised by kitchen personnel that employees participate in monthly “chats”. From the materials she was able to review none of these cover topics germane to the quality of the food service or to food safety. For example, one of the monthly topics was how to answer telephone calls correctly, and another was related to employee motivation. (Ex. 37).
33

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) disciplined because his fellow inmates refused to accept trays to be washed in living area showers and reused for food service. (Tr. Day 4 at 28-29, Ex. 35). The Court is hesitant to attribute such spiteful responses to cruelty or sadism; rather, these responses reveal what must be unmitigated frustration and desperation in dealing with the same incessant complaints and situations, over and over again, several times a day, every day of the week, for months on end, without receiving any kind of useful support from the prison officials with the capacity to bring about a solution.
It was brought to the Court's attention during the hearing that recent government layoffs left AOC kitchens without adequate supervisory personnel, and although it has already been recommended that personnel be trained to take over those supervisory duties, that recommendation has yet to be accepted. (Day 2 at105-108, 139-140). This is a recent development, postdating Plaintiffs' expert inspection of the kitchens. (Id.) Should this problem remain unresolved, it is likely that the lack of appropriate kitchen supervision will further aggravate the AOC's food service operations.
The Actions of the Secretary of Corrections: While Defendant Carlos Molina Rodríguez initially appears to have taken some preliminary steps to address the abysmal state of
34

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) food service in the AOC by informing himself on the state of AOC food service and investing in some new equipment and repairs, his efforts fall short of the type of categorical action that the situation truly requires considering the considerable health risk posed by the food services conditions at the AOC.
Although the Secretary pays lip service to a great urgency and concern regarding the state of food service (Tr. Day 2 at 23-24, 38-40, Ex. 2), upon closer examination he seems decidedly disengaged from the problem. For example, the Secretary, who is also the Administrator of Corrections, is not familiar and has little contact with the AOC staff involved in the agency's food service operations, including the AOC's Food Services Director. (Tr. Day 2 at 29-31, 74-77). In fact, after requesting that a report be generated evaluating food service throughout AOC institutions (Tr. Day 2 at 33-40, 71-74), he did not forward the report resulting from that exercise to the Director of Food Services,6 who was never even made aware that the evaluation had taken place until she heard testimony about it in open Court in the course of these hearings (Tr. Day 2 at 86-87). The results of that evaluation were also not forwarded to the AOC Dietitian
6 At time the Director of Food Services herself seems decidedly uninterested in the challenges presented by food service at the AOC. For example when asked, she was not aware of how many inmates were served by several of the AOC kitchens. (Tr. Day 2 at 107). She also testified that there were thirteen functioning AOC kitchens although all other witnesses agreed that there were fourteen. (Tr. Day 2 at 105).
35

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

Services Coordinator. (Tr. Day 6 at 61). These are the only

two dietitians in the employ of the entire agency for a

population of over twelve thousand inmates. (Tr. Day 2 at 85-

87, 132-133).

The Secretary was keen on sharing with the Court that he

had imparted particular "instructions" to unidentified AOC

personnel regarding various food service related matters (Tr.

Day 2 at 24-25, 32-34), yet there was no evidence of how these

instructions were given, when or to whom, nor of how the

Secretary planned to follow up on those instructions to ensure

their implementation. As this Court has previously recognized,

there is no doubt that in an agency the size of the AOC matters

should be delegated, but this sort of delegation cannot function

properly without accountability and clear standards and

procedures.

The privatization of food service: In August 2004, Canteen

Correctional Services Corporation was contracted to deliver food

services for the Administration of Corrections in the hopes that

food service would thereby be improved.

(Docket 8816).

Clearly, this change has not improved the quality of food

services in the correctional system. The Secretary declares

that a new food services contract, either with Canteen

Correctional Services Corporation or with another service

36

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

provider, should be put in place in order to improve food

service. According to the Secretary, the agency wants to

include controls to ensure compliance through sanctions, an

inspector who can carry out inspections within the system, a

requirement that more dietitians be involved in food service and

the inclusion of preventive maintenance to equipment in the

contract. (Tr. Day 2 at 33, 41, 45-46, 68, 72, 80).

But the Secretary's desire to execute a new food services

contract clearly predates his assessment of the state of the

AOC's food services. (Ex. 21, 2). Moreover, his subsequent

actions, as they relate to this goal, have not been directed to

improving the quality of food service to the inmate population.

The Secretary's first request for proposals relating to

food service, RFP-09-0001 was issued in March of 2009 (Ex. 21),

just a month after his confirmation as Secretary of the

Commonwealth's Department of Corrections and Administrator of

Corrections, (Tr. Day 2 at 22).

In August of 2009, the

Secretary issued a letter to the bids office explaining that

based on his visits to AOC kitchens, he had concluded that there

was an "urgent need to make substantial changes in the providing

of the food services," and stating that "substantial changes"

would be made to ensure that the administration's public policy

37

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) is complied with. (Ex. 2). RFP 09-0001, was therefore canceled.
During this time, however, Canteen's contract with the AOC was slated to automatically renew for another year in March of 2010. (Ex. 22). The Secretary could easily have notified Canteen in writing of its intent to terminate the contract with it 90 days prior to March 31, 2010 for the purpose of opening the contract to other bidders according to the terms of the contract, (Tr. Day 2 at 46-47, Ex. 22). He did not, however, do so (Tr. Day 2 at 44, 47-52), thereby creating tremendous uncertainty as to the legal feasibility of terminating the contract with Canteen7 in order to be able to contract with another party. (Tr. Day 1 at 6-12, 15-20, Tr. Day 2 at 41, 5255).
As mentioned RFP 09-0001, was cancelled, presumably on the basis that there were going to be major revisions to the RFP directed to improving the quality of food service. (Id.) Nevertheless the RFP issued by the Department of Corrections in December 2009, RFP 09-0042, is virtually identical to RFP 090001 (Ex. 22, 23) even to the point that the latter mistakenly
7 Although the Secretary sustains that Canteen has participated in the new requests for proposals as evidence that they were aware of the AOC’s intent to refuse to renew the contract (Tr. Day 2 at 81), this fact does not in any way guarantee that Canteen will not contest the legality of the AOC’s termination of its contractual obligations.
38

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) contains dates corresponding to the former. (Tr. Day 3 at 1317, Ex. 21, 22, 23). The new RFP did not contain any changes designed to address existing food service deficiencies as the Secretary claims.
The revised RFP did, however, divide AOC correctional institution into regions, to allow several contracts to different bidders to be awarded to different regions. (Ex. 22). This last bid was adjudicated in March 2010 (Tr. Day 3 at 28-9, Ex. 3) and later cancelled in April 2010 because the budget for the contract was not complete. (Tr. Day 3 at 19-20, 24-27, Ex. 23, 34). No one thought to wait to adjudicate the bid until budget was approved because those involved understood that there was “time pressure” (Tr. Day 3 at 26), presumably the pending motion for contempt filed by Plaintiffs. In a matter of days, the Secretary declared a state of emergency which permits him to bypass the bid process altogether in awarding another contract. (Tr. Day 3 at 37-39, Ex. 24).
The proposition that a new contract is necessary or would even be helpful in attaining a sustainable level of constitutionally adequate food service was not properly substantiated by any evidence and is a self-serving assertion on the part of Defendants. The AOC has a perfectly good Food Services Manual which is comprehensive, covering many if not all
39

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) of the basic food standards which were set out at the hearing. (Ex. 7). This Manual adopts explicitly and by reference industry standards such as the American Correctional Association standards governing food service, the National Research Council of the Food and Nutrition Board of the National Academy of Sciences, as well as the Food Code promulgated by the Food and Drug Administration (which has also been adopted by Puerto Rico's Department of Health as a regulation governing food service operations on the island). (Ex. 7). The Manual also incorporates by reference many of the orders of this Court. (Id.). Canteen Correctional Services Corporation is required to abide by the Food Services Manual. (Ex. 7).
Moreover, the AOC has an Evaluation and Contract Compliance Plan which sets forth in detail the manner in which the AOC supervises Canteen and ensures contract compliance. (Ex. 1). The AOC already has an "inspector," who is supposed to regularly visit AOC kitchens in order to demand compliance with Canteen's contractual obligations and with the minimum standards set out in the Food Services Manual; it is the Director of Food Services. (Ex. 1). Canteen is already required to repair most kitchen equipment. (Ex. 1 & 7). The problem is not Canteen's contractual obligations with the AOC, it is the AOC's utter failure to enforce those obligations.
40

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

The Director of Food Services apparently disavows any

responsibility for visiting AOC kitchens, meeting with Canteen

personnel, scrutinizing menu changes, requiring daily

inspections, etc. as set out in the Compliance Plan (Ex. 1, Tr.

Day 2 at 108-110, 114-122, 128-129). Likewise, the requirements

of the Food Services Manual are not taken seriously by the AOC

such as requiring adequate dishwashing equipment, sanitation and

cleaning, adherence to food temperature requirements and

observance of the food cycle menu and food service schedules.

(Tr. Day 2 at 102, 141-142, 144-145, Tr. Day 3 at 52-55, 61, Day

4 80-81, 110, Ex 7, 33, 37).

The Court finds that the Secretary's efforts to change the

currently existing food service contract at this time are

largely peripheral to the issue of providing constitutionally

adequate food service.

Neither evidence nor arguments have

been presented by Defendants to show that the currently existing

structure, including the current contract with Canteen

Correctional Services, cannot generate the changes necessary to

create constitutional conditions of food service or are

otherwise unworkable in some concrete way. If the AOC feels

that it will somehow serve its needs to change the currently

existing food service contract, it is its prerogative to make

such a change, and that prerogative must be exercised with due

41

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) consideration of its contractual and other legal obligations and of the significant expenditures of time, money and effort attendant on such changes. It should not, however, use its obligations under the U.S. Constitution and in this case as a pretext for making such changes.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The State has an affirmative duty to adequately provide for the basic human needs of inmates:
When the State by the affirmative exercise of its power so restrains an individual's liberty that it renders him unable to care for himself, and at the same time fails to provide for his basic human needs - e.g. food, clothing, shelter, medical care and reasonable safety - it transgresses the substantive limits on state action set by the Eighth Amendment. DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. Of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989); see also Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25, 32 (1993) ("When the State takes a person into its custody and holds him there against his will, the Constitution imposes upon him a corresponding duty to assume some responsibility for his safety and general well-being. . . . Contemporary standards of decency require no less."); Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 102-104 (1976) ("The infliction of . . . unnecessary suffering is inconsistent with contemporary standards of decency as manifested in modern legislation codifying the common law view that 'it is but just that the public be required to care for the
42

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) prisoner, who cannot, by reason of the deprivation of his liberty, care for himself.'") (citations omitted).
Various conditions of confinement may establish an Eighth Amendment violation even when each would not do so alone, when they have a mutually enforcing effect that produces the deprivation of a single, identifiable human need, such as food. Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 304 (1991); Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 346-7 (1981) ("Conditions . . ., alone or in combination, may deprive inmates of the minimal civilized measure of life's necessities.'").
Under the circumstances proven in these hearings, this Court concludes that the conditions described, taken together, produce the deprivation of adequate food to the Plaintiff Class.
It has long been established law that "[T]he State must provide an inmate with a healthy habitable environment [which] includes providing nutritionally adequate food that is prepared and served under conditions which do not present an immediate danger to the health and well being of the inmates who consume it. French v. Owens, 777 F.2d 1250, 1255 (7th Cir. 1985); Robles v. Coughlin, 725 F. 2d 12, 15 (2d Cir. 1983); Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 570 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 1041 (1981).
43

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) The findings of fact outlined above demonstrate that the
food being provided to the Plaintiff Class is not nutritionally adequate because it is not provided in sufficient quantities:
The sustained deprivation of food can be cruel and unusual punishment when it results in pain without any penological purpose. . . . [I]nmates rely on prison officials to provide them with adequate sustenance on a daily basis. The repeated and unjustified failure to do so amounts to a serious depravation. Foster v. Runnels, 554 F.3d 807, 814 (9th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted). A systematic failure to provide food in sufficient quantity to maintain normal health violates the Eighth Amendment. See Phelps v. Kapnolas, 308 F.3d 180, 187 (2d Cir. 2002) (inmate alleged he had been placed on nutritionally inadequate restricted diet for fourteen days); Reed v. McBride, 178 F.3d 849, 853-56 (7th Cir. 1999) (alleged deprivation of food was sufficiently serious and prison officials' deliberate indifference was obvious); Simmons v. Cook, 154 F.3d 805, 807-09 (8th Cir. 1998) (inmates were deprived of four consecutive meals); Robles v. Coughlin, 725 F.2d 12, 15-16 (2nd Cir. 1983) (deprivation of meals for twelve days during a fifty-three day period); Cunningham v. Jones, 567 F.2d 653, 660 (6th Cir. 1977) (remanding for consideration of whether one meal per day which was provided was nutritionally adequate to maintain normal health); Dearman v. Woodson, 429 F.2d 1288, 1290 (10th Cir.
44

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

1970) (refusal to provide food during a fifty and a half hour

period).

Moreover, this Court notes that menu substitutions and

inadequate portion measurement result in inmates receiving less

quantities of certain particular types of aliments, specifically

vegetables and proteins, than required. (Ex. 33, 37). This

Court finds that the resulting failure to provide sufficient

quantities of those foods over a sustained period of time

results in a nutritionally inadequate diet.

See e.g.,

Antonelli v. Sheahan, 81 F.3d 1422, 1432 (7th Cir. 1996)

(prisoner stated a cause of action under the Eighth Amendment by

claiming "not just 'ransid food' [sic], but also a

'nutritionally deficient' diet"); Rust v. Grammer, 858 F.2d 411,

414 (8th Cir. 1988) (diet without fruits and vegetables might

violate Eighth Amendment if it were regular prison diet);

LeMaire v. Maass, 12 F.3d 1444, 1455 (9th Cir. 1993) (evaluating

nutritional content of food provided); Cunningham v. Jones, 567

F.2d 653, 657 (6th Cir. 1997) (taking in consideration

nutritional content in finding an Eighth Amendment violation).

In addition, "[f]ood served to inmates is deficient under

constitutional standards, even when nutritionally complete, if

it is prepared under conditions so unsanitary as to make it

unwholesome and a threat to the health of inmates who consume

45

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) it." Toussaint v. McCarthy, 597 F.Supp. 1388 (1984). In evaluating the conditions under which AOC food is stored, prepared and served, this Court has considered the applicable Food Code standards pointed out by Plaintiffs’ expert, as well as the AOC's own Food Service Manual. Such codes, while not establishing "constitutional minima" are relevant in making a finding regarding the constitutionality of existing conditions." Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 570 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 1041 (1981).
The storage, preparation and service of food at the AOC are sufficiently unsanitary as to implicate the Eighth Amendment. Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1091 (9th Cir. 1996) ("Food that is spoiled and water that is foul would be inadequate to maintain health."); French v. Owens, 777 F.2d 1250, 1255 (7th Cir. 1985) (finding unsanitary kitchens and food storage areas to be unconstitutional); Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 570 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 1041 (1981) (noting that the failure to adequately store foods and maintain adequate food temperatures contributes to conditions that constitute Eighth Amendment violation.); Lightfoot v. Walker, 486 F.Supp. 504, 524 (S.D. Ill. 1980) (improper food storage, inadequate dishwashers, untrained personnel, the failure to provide a special diet for those who need it found to be unconstitutional).
46

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) Moreover, the AOC deprives inmates with special medical
conditions of proper medically ordered diets in violation of the Eighth Amendment, placing these inmates at very grave risk of serious medical complications. Byrd v. Wilson, 701 F.2d 592, 594-95 (6th Cir. 1983) (low sodium, high protein diet); Massey v. Hutto, 545 F.2d 45 (8th Cir. 1976) (stomach ulcers); Woulard v. Food Service, 294 F.Supp.2d 596 (D.Del. 2003) (diabetes and Crohn's disease); Kyle v. Allen, 732 F.Supp. 1157 (S.D. Fla 1990) (ulcers); Balla v. Idaho State Bd. Of Corrections, 595 F.Supp 1558 (D.Idaho 1984) (diabetes & Crohn's disease) ("There is simply no penological justification for depriving inmates with serious medical problems of their duly prescribed diets"); see generally, Sealock v. Colorado, 218 F.3d 1205, 1209 (10th Cir. 2000) ("[a] medical need is serious if it is one that has been diagnosed by a physician as mandating treatment . . ."); Gaudreault v. Municipality of Salem, Mass., 923 F.2d 203, 208 (1st Cir. 1990) (same).
The failure to maintain any consistent program for providing special diets also causes the failure to honor diet restrictions imposed by an inmate's religion implicating Plaintiffs' First Amendment free exercise rights. Kahane v. Carlson, 527 F.2d 492, 495-6 (2nd Cir. 1975) ("[P]rison
47

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) authorities must accommodate the right of prisoners to receive diets consistent with their religious scruples.")
In order to establish liability under the Eighth Amendment a prison official must "know[] of and disregard[] an excessive risk to inmate health or safety," specifically, the official must both be aware of facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exists, and he must also draw the inference." Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 837 (1994). The Eighth Amendment's state of mind requirement, "is a question of fact subject to demonstration in the usual ways, including inference from circumstantial evidence, and a factfinder may conclude that a prison official knew of a substantial risk from the very fact that the risk was obvious." Farmer, 511 U.S. at 842-3. It is not necessary that a prison official be aware of the precise consequences, but that the official be aware of "facts from which the inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of harm exists." Smith v. Brenoettsy, 158 F.3d 908, 912 (5th Cir. 1998).
Despite his characterization of the food services problem as "critical" and "emergent," Secretary Molina testified that he does not believe inmate health to be at risk. (Tr. Day 2 at 6467). This testimony is simply not credible. Where a substantial risk of serious harm is "'longstanding, pervasive, well-
48

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) documented, or expressly noted by prison officials in the past, and the circumstances suggest that the defendant-official being sued has been exposed to information concerning the risk and thus 'must have known' about it, then such evidence could be sufficient to permit a trier of fact to find that the defendant official had actual knowledge of the risk.'" Id. (citations and quotations omitted).
There can be no doubt in this case that the failure to provide adequate food service and medically prescribed diets and their potential damaging effects on inmate health are just such "longstanding, pervasive, well documented" risks which have been "expressly noted" and brought to the attention of all prison officials who have participated in this case in the past. The problems noted in this opinion are not new, they have existed for many many years. A report, commissioned by Secretary Molina in August of 2009, and issued in September of 2009, the results of which were submitted to him, drew a dismal system wide compliance rate of 67%, with several items drawing compliance of 0%. (Tr. Day 2 at 71-72, Ex. 33). The record is clear that Secretary Molina is, not only aware of the condition of AOC food service, but that he has observed it first hand and has received reports from his staff about such food service which painted a grim picture of food service at the AOC.
49

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

Moreover, the risk of food borne illnesses from consuming

contaminated food prepared and served in unhygienic conditions

is obvious.

The Secretary clearly has had sufficient

information to be aware of an unreasonable risk to inmate health

from inadequate food service. He cannot now hide behind an

excuse that he was unaware of such an obvious risk. See Brice

v. Virginia Beach Correctional Center, 58 F.3d 101, 105-106 (4th

Cir. 1995) ("intentionally contrived obliviousness," meets the

deliberate indifference standard under the Eighth Amendment.)

The reasonableness of a prison official's response to such

risks is a question for the trier of fact. Smith v. Brenoettsy,

158 F.3d 908, 912 (5th Cir. 1998). As already mentioned,

Secretary Molina has taken some action in response to the poor

food service conditions he knows to exist at the AOC. Above

all, he should be commended for his efforts to inform himself of

the conditions of the AOC's food services operations and for the

purchase and repairs of equipment which will begin to address

some of the deficiencies noted. Despite these modest efforts,

however, this Court finds that the Secretary of Corrections'

actions fall far short of the type of action required if meeting

constitutional standards in food service is the goal. Despite

his awareness of the problems, there are many actions the

Secretary failed to take to address these conditions: (1) the

50

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) Secretary never used the tools at his disposal to require that Canteen Correctional Services correct deficiencies (i.e. the Food Manual and the Compliance Plan); (2) he did not claim to have attempted to confer with Canteen Correctional Services to insist that it comply with its obligations under its contract and under the Food Service Manual; (3) he never met and coordinated with his own Director of Food Services (a) to address existing food services deficiencies, or (b) to evaluate why AOC kitchens and food service fail to comply with the AOC's Food Services Manual or (c) to determine why the Director of Food Services is either unwilling or unable to comply with the Contract Compliance Plan in order to supervise Canteen's execution of the contract with the AOC. These are all basic, common sense, rather inescapable measures which were not undertaken, even in the face of well known and obscene conditions which clearly place inmates at unreasonable risk of serious harm from malnutrition, medical complications, and foodborne illnesses. This Court therefore concludes that Secretary Molina’s response to the food service issue is insufficient, and that he has acted with deliberate indifference to the risk of harm to Plaintiff Class.
Based on all of the above, the Court finds that there is a current and ongoing violation of federal law, specifically, that
51

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)
food service conditions at the AOC violate the Eighth Amendment
of the U.S. Constitution in that they create an unreasonable
risk of malnutrition, food-borne illness and medical
complications with respect to the Plaintiff Class.
REMEDY
The Court has now spent thirty years in this case,
examining the conditions of confinement in the AOC and
attempting to remedy them. As this Court takes stock of the
matters which are now before it, it cannot help but consider the
long and tortuous history of this case, marked as it is by
occasional, sometimes even encouraging improvement, but
dominated by backsliding, wasted energy, neglect, misdirection,
contemptuous disregard and frustration.
As early as 1974, the Supreme Court made the following
observations about the role of the federal judiciary in the
context of prison administration:
Prison administrators are responsible for maintaining internal order and discipline, for securing their institutions against unauthorized access or escape, and for rehabilitating, to the extent that human nature and inadequate resources allow, the inmates placed in their custody. The Herculean obstacles to effective discharge of these duties are too apparent to warrant explication. Suffice it to say that the problems of prisons in America are complex and intractable, and, more to the point, they are not readily susceptible of resolution by decree. Most require expertise, comprehensive planning, and the commitment of
52

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)
resources, all of which are peculiarly within the province of the legislative and executive branches of government. For all of those reasons, courts are ill equipped to deal with the increasingly urgent problems of prison administration and reform. Judicial recognition of that fact reflects no more than a healthy sense of realism . . . . But a policy of judicial restraint cannot encompass any failure to take cognizance of valid constitutional claims whether arising in a federal or state institution.
Procunier v. Martinez, 416 U.S. 396, 404-405 (1974).
This Court can attest to its own, "healthy sense of
realism," with respect to its role in this case. To be sure,
this Court has never attempted to usurp AOC authority, even
though it has acquired a significant education on correctional
administration through its participation in this case throughout
the last thirty years. On the contrary, this Court's remedial
orders in this case have been characterized by the Court's
repeated deference to the wishes of prison authorities every
time that they have demonstrated a desire to address
constitutional wrongs, by its willingness to call upon the most
knowledgeable and experienced experts in assisting AOC prison
officials to improve conditions of confinement at the AOC and by
its restraint in withholding some of the more intrusive and
aggressive remedies which it might otherwise have imposed.
This approach stemmed from the Court's deep desire to see
the AOC solve its own problems, not only out of judicial
53

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)
deference, but because, as trite as it may sound, this Court had
been convinced that in order to effect lasting change, that
change had to borne from the prison system itself, from the
people who have to be present day in and day out, working within
that system. Without wholeheartedly dismissing such an approach
as hopelessly naive, this Court nevertheless cannot help but
note that, in spite of some limited success, this approach has
by no means brought about the sort of fundamental systemic
change which would allow the Court to extricate itself from the
case, at least not anytime soon.
At around the same time that this litigation began, Justice
Brennan, in his concurrence in the Rhodes v. Chapman case, made
the following observations regarding institutional reform
litigation in the prison context:
[I]ndividual prisons or entire prison systems in at least 24 States have been declared unconstitutional under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, with litigation underway in many others. Thus, the lower courts have learned from repeated investigation and bitter experience that judicial intervention is indispensable if constitutional dictates - not to mention considerations of basic humanity - are to be observed in the prisons.
No one familiar with litigation in this area could suggest that the courts have been overeager to usurp the task of running prisons, which as the Court today properly notes, is entrusted in the first instance to the legislature and prison administration rather than a court. . . .
Public apathy and the political powerlessness of inmates have contributed to the pervasive neglect of
54

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)
the prisons. . . . Thus, the suffering of prisoners, even if known, generally 'moves the community in only the most severe and exceptional cases.' As a result even conscientious prison officials are 'caught in the middle,' as state legislatures refuse "to spend sufficient tax dollars to bring conditions in outdated prisons up to minimally acceptable standards." After extensive exposure to this process [one court] came to view the "barbaric physical conditions" of Rhode Island's prison system as "the ugly and shocking outward manifestations of a deeper dysfunction, an attitude of cynicism, hopelessness, predatory selfishness, and callous indifference that appears to infect, to one degree or another, almost everyone who comes in contact with the [prison]."
Under these circumstances, the courts have emerged as a critical force behind efforts to ameliorate inhumane conditions. . . .
Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 353-354 and 358-359 (1980).
This Court too has been witness to the dysfunction,
cynicism, hopelessness, apathy, and to the frustration, which
pervades and dominates any effort to change and correct
unconstitutional conditions of confinement at the AOC. Due to
the manner in which this case has operated, the AOC often sees
in the Court a resource for making capital improvements to the
correctional system and for enlisting the aid of private persons
or companies which participate in different aspects of
correctional operations. Much to the dismay of the Court, such
investments of time, resources, energy and good will, all too
often vanish into thin air.
55

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) In the food services context, in particular, the Court
believes that it has been solicitous, perhaps to a fault, of Defendants' proposed solutions, particularly in recent years in which the AOC recruited a well established and experienced company to run its food service operations, designed a Food Services Manual and developed a specific compliance plan to oversee the execution of the food services contract. Nevertheless, many of the same problems which have existed for years in the case continue to exist despite all of these efforts because once these solutions are designed, detailed and written out, Defendants feel free to ignore them and to abdicate their duties under the Constitution.
During most of the long history of this case, it has been neither the lack of funding nor the lack of expertise which has allowed many of the unconstitutional conditions which were first noted thirty years ago to continue unabated. The crucial missing ingredient is the desire and the determination to actually implement the solutions which will address ongoing unconstitutional wrongs. This Court has no doubt that in a case in which the unconstitutional conditions of confinement have proven so recalcitrant and intransigent, it has authority to appoint a receiver as an independent party empowered to ensure that its orders are actually carried out. See generally, Plata
56

Civil No. 79-4 (PG)

v. Schwarzenegger, 603 F.3d 1088 (9th Cir. 2010). Receivership

has been common since the reign of Queen Elizabeth I, and was

seen as a means of protection when the Court doubted that a

party in possession would obey a Court's injunction. 12 Charles

Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Richard L. Marcus, Federal

Practice & Procedure § 2981 (2nd ed. 1997), page 7. There is

suitable justification for the establishment of a receivership

in this case for the purpose of comprehensively addressing the

case as a whole, including food service as one component.

The remedial order imposed by this Court below, requires

the implementation of critical food safety practices and will

permit the oversight and implementation of those practices.

(Tr. Day 4 at 80-81, Day 5 at 11-12). The Court finds that this

remedy, based specifically on the evidence presented by the

parties during the hearing of this matter, due consideration

being given to the history of this case, is narrowly drawn,

extends no further than necessary to correct a violation of

federal rights, and is the least intrusive means of doing so.

The remedial order of this Court will not adversely impact

public safety. On the contrary, maintaining adequate standards

with respect to food service and safety is likely to positively

impact the health of AOC staff who are also exposed to AOC food

and public health generally.

There is also no reason to

57

Civil No. 79-4 (PG) believe that this order will negatively impact criminal justice operations.
After long and careful consideration the Court ORDERS the defendants within the next forty-five days to submit an itemized list of what they will do in terms of creating the positions and staffing to implement the prior orders of this Court. Law 7 and any other local legislation shall not be deemed an excuse to fulfill this obligation by not later than April 15, 2011. The callous disregard of hygiene with which the Administration of Corrections feeds plaintiffs and their own staff must stop.
IT IS SO ORDERED. In San Juan, Puerto Rico, December 2, 2010.
S/ JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ
JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE.
58

 
 Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 1 of 32

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

CARLOS MORALES FELICIANO, et al. Plaintiffs,
v.
LUIS FORTUÑO BURSET, et al. Defendants.

CIVIL NO. 79-4 (PJB-LM)

SETTLEMENT ACCORD Introduction
1. This Settlement Accord, which the Court may consider as a form of consent decree, resolves all outstanding issues and claims for equitable relief regarding the conditions of confinement at any and all of the penal and/or correctional institutions within the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (hereinafter referred to as “DCR”) which are the subject of this whole litigation. Notwithstanding, this Settlement Accord does not address or resolve any of the following: (a) Individual class members’ claims for damages; (b) the existence of a class for the purpose of the damages claims; (c) if the Defendants in their official capacity as further defined herein are required to deposit with this Court the uncollected fines that have been assessed and imposed by the Court; and (d) the way and manner the said Defendants are required to pay the assessed but uncollected fines. Based on the terms contained herein, the parties request that the Court issue a Partial Final Judgment of the Injunctive Phase of this case disposing of all equitable relief claims.
2. This litigation, which has been ongoing since 1979, has generated over 1,300 Orders, some of which have become unnecessary because they pertain to

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 2 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
institutions and/or practices that no longer exist; others have become moot because the Defendants have complied with them; others are no longer necessary inasmuch as the Defendants have incorporated them into their rules, regulations, and policies, and others could be unenforceable because they impose obligations beyond the minimum constitutional standards.
3. This Settlement Accord will be directly enforceable by the Court for two (2) years from the date of entry of the Partial Final Judgment of the Injunctive Relief Phase. Upon completion of said time period, the relief stipulated by the parties shall be terminated, unless otherwise provided by the Court pursuant to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. §3626, et seq. (hereinafter referred to as PLRA).
4. This Settlement Accord contains all of the obligations that the Defendants must comply with in regards to all the areas of the case which are: access to courts; laundry services; classification; medical services; food services; admission cells; recreation; staffing and security; environmental conditions; crowding; visitation; and parole. The obligations set forth in this document are the product and result of a comprehensive and arms-length negotiation process between the parties and constitute the final agreement with regards to the equitable relief sought in this case.
Definitions 5. EFFECTIVE DATE: The date the Court enters Partial Final Judgment of the Injunctive Phase pursuant to the terms of this Settlement Accord. 6. PRISONER: Any adult or young adult incarcerated or detained in any facility who is accused of, convicted of, sentenced for, or adjudicated delinquent for, civil
2

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 3 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
contempt, violations of criminal law or the terms and conditions of parole, probation, pretrial release, or diversionary program.
7. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION: The agency responsible for the daily operations of Correctional Institutions and Community Programs for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
8. INSTITUTION: Every structure that is maintained for the purpose of housing and supervising a prisoner whose care and custody are the responsibilities of the DCR. The institution must be operated and managed by the DCR or a private management company that has been contracted by the DCR or that is authorized through a contract with DCR.
9. POLICY: Administrative rules and guidelines of the agency that indicate how to conduct the specific procedures to comply with the daily work activities.
10. DEFENDANTS: All of the current successors of all of the named defendants in the Fifth Amended Complaint filed on December 31, 1993, Docket No. 4840, who were sued in their official capacities.
11. PLAINTIFF CLASS: All current or future prisoners under the custody of the DCR.
Categories 12. After arduous months of negotiations and discussions the parties concluded a final agreement which incorporated all past accords as to the following categories, to wit: (1) access to courts (2) laundry services, (3) classification, (4) medical services, (5) food services, (6) admission cells, and (7) recreation (8) staffing and security, (9) environmental conditions and subcategories contained therein.
3

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 4 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
Category 1: Access to Courts 13. All members of the Plaintiff Class shall be granted adequate, effective and meaningful access to courts. 14. All DCR libraries will be open from Monday to Friday, at least, for six hours a day, at hours that meet the needs of the inmates at each institution. The operating hours of the library shall be posted outside the library and in all inmate housing units. 15. All libraries shall provide inmates with paper, pencils, pens and envelopes, as well as provide access to typewriters and/or computers, and all other materials necessary to write correspondence and draft legal documents. Photocopies and postage stamps will be made available for sale to all inmates, but will be provided to indigent inmates at no cost to them. 16. With regards to inmates in protective custody, disciplinary segregation and/or hospitalization, a procedure shall be maintained whereby inmates shall be provided with legal books and materials as required. All other inmates shall be guaranteed reasonable access to the library during operating hours. A procedure shall be maintained whereby an inmate who needs to use the library shall be guaranteed access to it. 17. All legal materials, including but not limited to Federal and Commonwealth of Puerto Rico laws and judicial decisions, shall be updated regularly. All current DCR and Parole Board regulations, and any other regulations concerning the institutional life of an inmate, will be kept in all libraries and be available upon request. 18. Each DCR library will have a librarian or librarian assistant in charge, which will be available to aid inmates in the use of the library facilities and its legal
4

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 5 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
materials. DCR librarians and librarian assistants will receive periodic training in the usage and handling of legal materials.
19. The DCR will employ two (2) paralegals, fluent in Spanish and English, which will provide service to all DCR libraries. A procedure shall be maintained whereby the paralegals will regularly visit all DCR institutions, but will also be available for personal appointments upon request.
20. The DCR will grant inmates with physical access to their attorneys, where privacy shall be guaranteed, as well as the ability to send and receive confidential written communications regarding legal matters.
21. The DCR will maintain an Administrative Recourse Division with the staff needed to tend to all inmate grievances in a timely fashion. Each DCR facility will assign civilian personnel to process inmate grievances. The appointed civilian personnel shall adequately inform inmates on the policies and procedures surrounding the filing of inmate grievance forms.
22. Inmate grievance forms shall be readily available at all DCR institutions. The filled grievance forms will be placed by the inmates in sealed envelopes in the drop box provided for those purposes in all DCR institutions. The envelopes will be provided by the DCR. The filled grievance forms will be collected by civilian personnel or by the correctional officer in charge of mail. In the instances in which the correctional officer in charge of the mail collects the filled grievance forms the forms shall be placed in a sealed envelope, the collected forms will be delivered to the grievance office on the same date. The responses to the grievance will be delivered by the civilian personnel of
5

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 6 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
the grievances office of the DCR institution. The responses will be distributed periodically by the civilian personnel only.
23. Procedures shall be maintained to aid inmates who cannot read or write, or are otherwise unable to fill out and submit an inmate grievance form.
Category 2: Laundry Services 24. Within 24 hours of admission, every inmate must be provided with the following items of clothing:
 underwear (including brassieres for female inmates)  shirts  pants  short pants  socks  footwear 25. All clothing shall be properly fitted, climatically suitable and in good condition (i.e. clean, no holes, etc.). 26. Clothing issued to inmates shall be in sufficient quantities to permit inmates to change underwear and socks daily and other clothing (including brassieres) every three days. The laundry schedule shall be sufficient to achieve this objective. All clothing distributed and exchanged shall be documented and signed by the institutional officer involved. 27. Special medical needs that require a deviation from the general clothing standards must be particularly addressed in order to secure the medical and mental health of inmates. Also, inmates’ religious beliefs that require a deviation from the
6

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 7 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
general clothing standards must be respected and particularly addressed to allow proper religious practice.
28. Items that have come into contact with agents capable of causing infection or contamination must be specially processed to prevent a spread of contamination or infection.
29. Clean and suitable bedding and linen must be provided for each inmate, including:
 one sanitary and serviceable mattress  one sanitary and serviceable pillow  two sheets  one pillow cover  one towel 30. Washable items, such as sheets, pillow covers and towels shall be exchanged each week for a clean set, and such procedure must be documented and signed. 31. All mattresses and pillows shall be made of non-absorbent, flame retardant, non-toxic and easily cleanable material. At least twice a year, mattresses and pillows must be cleaned and sanitized. Mattresses and pillows of released inmates must be cleaned and sanitized prior to re-issuance for another inmate. These procedures must be documented and signed. 32. Defendants will become fully self-sufficient in the production of inmate uniforms, inmate underwear (male and female), bed linens, mattresses and pillows by specified March 31, 2013. These products will be manufactured by inmates themselves
7

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 8 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
in workshops located in DCR institutions. Defendants will maintain sufficient quantities of cloth, mattress foam, and other necessary materials in DCR warehouses at all times.
33. The laundry area must be clean and well organized as follows:  A detailed cleaning schedule must be available for review by all personnel.  There must be washing, drying, folding, pressing and storage areas.  Spills must be immediately clean and the floors must be free of water.  Trash containers must be available and regularly emptied.  All areas and equipment must be clean.
34. Chemicals and soaps must be maintained and handled according to Material Safety Data Sheets. Correct soaps and proper wash formulas must be used. Personal Protective Equipment must be available.
35. Preventive maintenance for laundry equipment must be performed once a week. The need for repair of laundry equipment must be reported immediately to maintenance staff, and shall be repaired or replaced within thirty (30) days of its breakdown. These procedures must be documented and signed.
Category 3: Classification 36. Defendants will ensure that inmates are housed in appropriate facilities to provide for their programming and health needs. 37. Defendants will implement the new Classification Manual and will train all classification personnel in the correct use and application of the manual. 38. The implementation of the Manual and the re-training of employees will commence two (2) months after the Manual is registered at the Department of State.
8

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 9 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
39. The implementation of the Manual will be validated by Dr. James Austin. 40. Defendants recognize that the Manual creates an objective classification system. Hence, discretional overrides will be kept at a minimum.
Category 4: Medical Services 41. The MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CARE PLAN (“MMHCP”), as approved by the Court’s April 28, 2011 Order (Docket No. 9907), is hereby expressly adopted as part of this Settlement Accord. Defendants shall comply with each and every obligation arising under the MMHCP. 42. Defendants will comply, and ensure compliance on the part of the private service provider, with all obligations set forth in the contract entered into between the Defendants and “Correctional Health Services Corporation” for the provision of medical services to the Plaintiff Class. 43. The DCR will dispense all prescriptions written to members of the Plaintiff Class by external medical professionals. Notwithstanding, the DCR may provide acceptable alternate medication in compliance with its protocols and medication formulary. Likewise, any medical order issued by an external treating physician will be incorporated into the inmate’s medical treatment plan. 44. The process of substituting medications must be completed within a period of time so as to not delay treatment. If it becomes evident that this process will result in a delay of treatment, Defendants will comply with the prescription as issued by the external treating physician, unless said action creates a hazard or risk to the inmate’s health. The use of bio-equivalents or acceptable alternate medication following the protocols and/or medication formulary will not be considered a substitution.
9

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 10 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
45. The inmate’s medical file must include all external orders and/or prescriptions, and all shall reflect the substitution of medications or the modification of a medical order.
46. In the event an external medical provider writes a prescription for Ultram and/or Neurontin (referred hereinafter jointly as “the Medication”), the DCR agrees to the following procedure:
a. The DCR, through its medical provider, will evaluate each prescription for the Medication and will determine if the same is contraindicated for the particular patient. If there is any such contraindication, the prescription shall not be filled and shall be substituted by an acceptable alternate medication as defined by community and/or correctional medical standards. The inmate shall be informed of this substitution.
b. In the event the external medical provider prescribes the medication and the same is not contraindicated, a substitution for other reasons shall follow the clinical protocols for the Medication. In the event of a substitution, the DCR, through its medical provider, shall inform the inmate of the reasons for the substitution prior to administering the same.
c. In the event of a post-operative inmate, the DCR, through its medical provider, shall follow the protocol for the prescription of the Medication, which includes providing the Medication as provided therein.
47. The DCR agrees that, through its medical provider, it shall provide every six (6) months information and/or training to all inmates concerning the usage of bioequivalent medication so as to make them aware of their effectiveness and usage.
10

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 11 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
All bioequivalent medications dispensed to inmates shall be marked as such. If an inmate requests additional information regarding the bioequivalent medication he/she is receiving, the DCR shall, offer the inmate such information regarding the bioequivalent medication being dispensed.
48. A procedure will be maintained for the timely renewal of necessary medications so as to prevent the interruption of treatment between prescriptions.
49. It is Defendants’ obligation to transport all inmates to their external medical appointments. In the event that Defendants do not comply with this obligation, the DCR shall within four (4) working days, seek a new appointment, recognizing that the DCR does not control the available appointments by external providers.
Category 5: Food Services 50. The DCR will comply, and ensure compliance on the part of the private service provider, with all obligations set forth in the Food Services Manual and the contract entered into between the Defendants and “Compass Group USA, Inc” and “Trinity Services I, LLC” for the provision of food services to the Plaintiff Class. The Manual and the contract are hereby expressly adopted as part of this Settlement Accord. Any violation of the contract shall be deemed a direct violation of this Settlement Accord. 51. The DCR will observe strict compliance with the 2009 Federal Food Code, including any supplements or future versions of the document. 52. The DCR will observe strict compliance with all of its present and future regulations (i.e. DCR Meal Plan) regarding the provision of food services to the Plaintiff Class.
11

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 12 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
Category 6: Admission Cells 53. Admissions area cells, detention cells and holding pens shall be used only for temporary detention and transfer purposes. Inmates may be held in any such cell, pen or area for a maximum period of 24 hours. Inmates in admission cells, detention cells or holding pens must be under constant supervision to ensure that their safety and hygienic needs are met. 54. The established capacities of all admission, detention and holding cells shall be prominently displayed at the entrance of each cell. Except in the event of an emergency, Defendants will not exceed the maximum established capacity of any such cell. In the event of an emergency, Defendants may house more inmates than the established capacity in such cells, but for a period no longer than 8 hours.
Category 7: Recreation 55. Recreation is any organized activity to be carried out in spare time, managed by the DCR in its Correctional Institutions. Defendants will establish a Recreational Program which will impact all members of the Plaintiff Class. 56. All DCR institutions shall have dedicated recreational leaders, designated recreational areas and sufficient equipment and/or materials. 57. The recreation program must provide for indoor and outdoor recreational activities and must insure that all prisoners are afforded two (2) hours of physical recreation in open air at least five (5) days per week, weather conditions permitting. Physical recreation can be provided in designated areas inside the institutions, but
12

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 13 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
outside the housing units. The opportunity to participate in passive recreational activities should be provided to inmates as much as possible.
58. The remaining two days of the week, in which physical recreation is not mandatory, prisoners must be afforded two hours of physical movement in open air, weather permitting. Overall, inmates should be afforded the maximum amount of time possible in open air, outside housing units and outside the cells.
Category 8: Staffing and Security 59. The parties recognize that adequate levels of staffing in DCR institutions, of custodial and civilian personnel, are essential to provide security, safety, access to medical services, access to courts, recreation and other essential services. 60. With regards to custodial officers, the parties have identified a current deficiency of 635 officers system-wide. The parties have also identified a yearly attrition rate of 250 officers. In order to reach adequate levels of staffing of custodial officers, Defendants will undertake and maintain a recruitment plan. Defendants will recruit, train and employ 400 new custodial officers yearly until the deficiency is satisfied. This will be achieved by holding two academies of 200 cadets each year. 61. Newly recruited custodial officers will be distributed throughout DCR institutions as needed. As an exception, any institution without a custodial officer assigned to distribute correspondence and inmate grievance forms will fill this vacancy as soon as possible. 62. Once the adequate level of correctional officers is reached, Defendants will continue yearly recruiting of officers in an amount, at least, comparable to the
13

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 14 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
established attrition rate, so that adequate levels of staffing are maintained. This attrition rate will be reviewed yearly.
63. With regards to socio-penal technicians, the parties agree that the maximum allowable caseloads will be 50, for pre-trial detainees, and 60, for sentenced inmates. Defendants shall ensure that socio-penal technician caseloads remain within the established amounts in the future, recruiting new technicians if necessary.
64. With regards to recreational leaders, Defendants will recruit, train and employ fifteen (15) new recreational leaders, to be distributed throughout the DCR system as needed. The new recreational leaders will be employed by October 31, 2012.
65. Defendants will recruit, train and employ twenty (20) new evaluators for the DCR’s inmate grievance program at the central office. The new evaluators will be employed by October 31, 2012.
66. Defendants will immediately deploy custodial officers inside all individual housing unit posts at DCR facilities.
67. Superintendents, commanders of the guard and shift supervisors will make regular visits to all housing units in their facilities. Shift supervisors will visit all housing units at least once each shift, commanders of the guard will visit all housing units at least three times a week and superintendents will visit all housing units at least twice a week. Defendants will develop forms that the above mentioned personnel will use to record their visits to housing units.
68. To ensure that all custodial officers employed by the DCR are up to date on their responsibilities under approved security and security-related policies and procedures, a continuous training curriculum shall be established and implemented for
14

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 15 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
in-service officers. The curriculum shall address areas such as, but not limited to: use of force; security inspections; medical emergencies; suicide precaution; first aid and CPR; escort procedures; post orders; key, tool and weapons control; fire safety; emergency plans; etc. All custodial officers must receive retraining at least every two (2) years.
69. All custodial officers assigned to work in an Intake Center will be provided with at least forty (40) hours of initial training and at least forty (40) hours of annual retraining specific to intake Center operations. The initial and annual retraining shall cover the following topics, at a minimum: intake procedures; security procedures; supervision of detainees; signs of suicide risk; suicide precaution; use of force; detainees' rights and responsibilities; family, social and attorney visits; fire and emergency procedures; safety procedures; classification procedures; housing unit supervision and duties; key control procedures; interpersonal relations; first aid and CPR; sanitation requirements; and detainee programs and services. More specifically, security staff who work in the admissions process of newly assigned detainees will be trained on: detainees’ rights to receive proper meals that are handled properly and are palatable; sanitation requirements and inspections of admission cells; intake recordkeeping; detainee rights to telephone access, showering, toilet use and drinking water access; time limitation in admission holding cells and cell capacities; supervision of detainees while in admission holding cells (constant supervision); specific detainee issuance of toothpaste, soap, toothbrush, deodorant, razors, toilet paper, clothing and towels; detainee medical, dental and mental health access procedures; and all DCR policy, procedures, post orders, and directives governing the administration and management of the admission process.
15

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 16 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
70. Defendants will develop a comprehensive training program for superintendents, high-ranking correctional officers, administrative staff at DCR facilities and mid-level management staff at the central office. The program will include supervisory training in order to monitor compliance with DCR policies and procedures. This program will be in place by October 31, 2012.
71. Each DCR facility will maintain a Master Roster and a Daily Roster. The Chief Custody Officer will be responsible for designing, administering and maintaining the Master Roster. The Chief Custody Officer will also have overall responsibility for designing the Daily Roster and ensuring that it is properly administered and maintained, but each Shift Supervisor will be specifically responsible for the proper administration and completion of the Daily Roster for his/her shift. The information included in these rosters shall be designated by shift, rank and category. Both rosters shall designate fixed and pull posts within each institution and list them in order of priority.
72. Defendants will develop the capability, either in-house or through contracts with private companies, to provide preventive, corrective and emergency maintenance of all electronic mechanisms in DCR institutions, including but not limited to, locking systems, fence alarms, metal detectors, closed circuit television systems, two-way radios, sally ports, and gates. Defendants will be prepared to maintain and repair all existing security equipment as well as security equipment that will be added to DCR institutions.
73. Each DCR institution shall designate at least one person as a key control officer, whose duty shall be implementing the key Control plan. The Key control officer will be in Charge of maintaining an accurate log of all key movements. Defendants will
16

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 17 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
implement a key issue system based on chits at all DCR institutions. Staff will replace each key they issue with a Chit to identify who has that key. No one will remove institutional keys from any DCR institution.
74. Defendants will store all institutional keys, except spare keys and extra key copies, on labeled hooks in the master key cabinets and will eliminate any other key control areas. The emergency response plan for each institution will specify secure and controlled locations for all emergency keys.
75. Each DCR institution shall designate at least one person as a tool control officer, whose duty shall be implementing the tool control plan. Staff will maintain an inventory of all tools and record the issue and return of these tools. Defendants will implement a tool issue system based on chits at all DCR institutions. Staff will replace each tool they issue with a chit to identify who has that tool. Defendants will utilize tool shadow boards in all tool control areas, armories, control centers, kitchens, and vocational training areas at all institutions.
Category 9: Environmental Conditions 76. The parties recognize that the Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan recommended by the Eightieth Report of the Court Monitor, Docket No.1786, as adopted by the Court through the March 30, 1990 Opinion and Order, Docket No. 2137, as subsequently amended, provides the roadmap for environmentally safe correctional facilities. Accordingly Defendants agree to comply with all of the provisions of the Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan that remain in full force and effect.
17

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 18 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
77. Defendants further agree that they will secure all of the fiscal and budgetary resources necessary to put into effect the provisions of the Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan.
78. To ensure compliance with the Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan, within the next sixty (60) days after this Court’s approval of this Settlement Accord, the parties will conduct joint site inspections of all of the correctional facilities that are under the aegis of the DOC in order to identify any and all environmental conditions that must be eliminated, corrected and/or repaired.
79. At the conclusion of each such site inspection, the parties will prepare a joint report and/or punch list identifying all of the environmental conditions in need of repair. Once a particular condition is identified and included in the joint report/punch list, Defendants will have one hundred eighty (180) days to effect the necessary repairs to correct the situation. The parties will meet regularly to review the deadline herein establish to make the necessary repairs to correct the situation, based on the progress in the repairs.
80. In the event the Department of Corrections does not meet the established deadline of one hundred eighty (180) days to make the proper repairs, the parties shall meet in good faith to discuss the allegations and will reach and agree to a remedial plan, including a set of reasonable deadlines considering the specific repairs that need to be done. This process must be concluded within thirty (30) days after the one hundred eighty (180) days deadline.
18

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 19 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
81. If the parties are not able to resolve the allegations within those thirty (30) days, and/or Plaintiffs find that the remedial plan has not been complied with, the parties will enter into a binding mediation process before an Independent Expert.
82. The Independent Expert shall be a reputable person possessing expert knowledge and experience for the determination of the matter in question and shall be independent of the parties. The party seeking arbitration shall send a list of three (3) proposed Independent Experts with their Curriculum Vitae. The non-moving party will have twenty (20) days to select an arbitrator from the list submitted to or to reject them. The twenty (20) days term will commence from the receipt of the list of proposed Independent Experts. If the non-moving party rejects the list of proposed Independent Experts, said party will submit a list of three (3) proposed Independent Experts to the moving party, who will evaluate the list and will decide whether to choose one of them, or to reject them. If the list of proposed Independent Experts is not satisfactory to the parties, the issue will then be submitted to the District Court, so that the Court will select the Independent Expert as a post-judgment remedy. The Independent Expert shall determine the matter in question as soon as practicable in light of the circumstances. The Independent Expert may make specific determinations, as an expert aside from his role as arbitrator, for remedial action that may be required. Such determination shall be binding on the parties. The costs of the Independent Expert shall be borne by the Department of Corrections.
83. After the initial joint site inspections are conducted, the Defendants will continue to perform the daily, weekly and/or monthly inspections required by the Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan. Defendants shall execute the repairs and
19

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 20 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
undertake the necessary measures to correct/repair any and all future environmental conditions detected during those inspections. Such corrective measures shall be undertaken within the timeframes allotted by the Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan.
84. All Post Judgment actions and/or petitions to the Court for remedies shall be limited to two (2) years after the entry of Final Partial Judgment of the Injunctive Phase of this case.
OTHER CATEGORIES ACCORDED Crowding
85. Defendants will eliminate the practice of double bunking maximum custody inmates. This will be in furtherance of the rehabilitation process of the inmates in maximum custody. Furthermore, Defendants will not institute the practice of double bunking in any future construction of maximum security institutions and /or maximum security prison cells.
Visitation 86. Defendants shall eliminate the practice of cancellation of visits as a collective disciplinary sanction.
Parole 87. Pursuant to Docket No. 10002, the following was submitted to the Court for its consideration and approval, and is resubmitted herein as part of this Settlement Accord: 88. Whenever a person is sentenced for having committed any crime by the courts of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, a copy of the sentence shall accompany
20

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 21 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
said person on his or her admission into the custody of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation as a sentenced prisoner, whether or not such prisoner is to be confined in a public or private institution, provided that the named inmate has been processed through the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. If, for whatever reason, the judgment of sentence is not received by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation whenever the sentenced prisoner is entrusted into its custody, the Secretary or his or her designated representative shall notify such prisoner, after the expiration of ten (10) working days from the date the DCR is aware of the absence of the sentence, and the Secretary shall simultaneously send a copy of said notice to the sentencing court.
89. Within five (5) working days of the receipt of the sentence the institution wherein the prisoner is incarcerated, the Department of Corrections shall make a computation or liquidation of the prisoner’s minimum and maximum sentences, and a copy thereof shall be given, in writing, to the prisoner at such time.
90. After the first computation or liquidation of sentence, each prisoner confined under a sentence shall have his sentence periodically recomputed for applicable statutory and/or regulatory credits which could reduce a maximum sentence. All violations or infractions which add to the prisoners sentence shall be reviewed periodically as provided in the applicable regulation. Each prisoner shall be notified, in writing, of each re-computation of his or her minimum and/or maximum sentence.
91. In all cases of transfer of prisoners, whether by personal request of the confine or at the instance of the Department of Corrections, it shall be obligatory for the Department of Corrections to re-compute the credits and deductions for work or good
21

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 22 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
time and re-liquidation of sentence, and post them in the prisoner’s records prior to transfer. No prisoner may be transferred from one institution to another within the penal system of Puerto Rico, unless his record files accompany him. In any emergency where prisoners are transferred for their safety or for the safety of the community, their file shall be transmitted with all the re-computations made, no more than five (5) working days from the date of transfer.
92. At least ninety (90) days prior to: (a) the completion of a felon’s minimum sentence; (b) the completion of twenty-five (25) years total time by a prisoner convicted of murder in the first degree under the Penal Code of 1974; (c) the completion of twenty-five (25) years total time by a prisoner convicted of a first degree felony or sentenced as a habitual delinquent under the Penal Code of 2004; or (d) the completion of ten (10) years total time by a minor tried and sentenced as an adult, the socio-penal worker in charge of the felon’s case shall transmit his or her recommendations, and the President of the Treatment Committee shall transmit its recommendations to the Parole Board. In any case where more than ten (10) days and less than ninety (90) days remain between the date of the sentence and the date of the completion of the minimum sentence, starting when the prisoner first comes in contact with a socio-penal worker, these recommendations shall be sent to the Parole Board as soon as possible and prior to the expiration of the prisoner’s minimum sentence. The files of any prisoner sentenced for a felony who has completed his or her minimum at the time he or she is sentenced, or who has ten (10) days or less days until said completion, shall be sent to the Parole Board forthwith, and the Parole Board shall hear such case within the time limits proscribed in Paragraph 96 of this Settlement Accord.
22

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 23 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
93. The Program for Parole of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation will also submit its report on each felon to the Parole Board in the period within ninety (90) days prior to: (a) the completion of a felon’s minimum sentence; (b) the completion of twenty-five (25) years total time by a prisoner convicted of murder in the first degree under the Penal Code of 1974; (c) the completion of twenty-five (25) years total time by a prisoner convicted of a first degree felony or sentenced as a habitual delinquent under the Penal Code of 2004; or (d) the completion of ten (10) years total time by a minor tried and sentenced as an adult. Felons who, at the time of their sentence, have more than thirty (30) days and less than ninety (90) days to serve until the completion of their minimum sentence, shall have their reports of the Program for Parole sent to the Parole Board as soon as possible and prior to the expiration of the minimum sentence. Any prisoner sentenced for a felony who has completed his or minimum sentence at the time of sentencing or who has thirty (30) days or less until the completion of such minimum at the time of sentence, shall have his or her file sent to the Parole Board forthwith and the Parole Board shall hear such prisoner’s case within the time limits proscribed in Paragraph 96 of this Settlement Accord.
94. Each penal institution shall send the Parole Board, each month, a list of all prisoners whose minimum sentences will expire within the subsequent ninety (90) days.
95. The Parole Board shall hear and consider each felon’s case as closely as possible to the date of the expiration of said felon’s minimum sentence, but always within forty five (45) days from the date of the expiration of said felon’s minimum sentence. These provisions shall apply to all felons whether incarcerated in an institution operated by the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, or whether in
23

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 24 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
custody or under supervision of any other public or private institution. No less than fifteen (15) working days prior to the date on which the Parole Board will hear a felon’s case concerning possible release on parole, the felon shall be notified, in writing, of the place, time and date of the hearing, the criteria that will be used for determining whether parole may be granted and the rights that will be available at the hearing.
96. Unless the Parole Board shall postpone the decision of release on parole for just cause, in which case the affected prisoner shall be notified of such action and the reasons therefore, and such decision may not, under any circumstance, be postponed for more than one hundred eighty (180) days from the date a decision would have been due, had there been no postponement, the Parole Board must decide to grant or deny parole within thirty (30) days from the date of the hearing. No later than twenty (20) calendar days from the date of the decision, each felon shall be notified of the decision and, in the case of denial of parole, the reasons for such denial and the date when he or she shall next be reconsidered by the Parole board for parole purposes.
97. Any prisoner who is otherwise eligible for parole shall not be denied parole solely because there may be an outstanding order of detention against said prisoner by some other governmental system (state, foreign or federal), provided said prisoner is otherwise qualified for parole.
98. Prisoners convicted of misdemeanors shall be entitled to a hearing before the Parole Board, except that when a misdemeanant is sentenced to a jail term, which, after liquidation, will terminate in forty five (45) days or less from the date on which the Parole Board receives the pertinent documents from the Department of Corrections and
24

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 25 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
Rehabilitation, the Parole Board may, in its discretion, decline to accept such case. In any case where the misdemeanant has not been jailed prior to sentence, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall send the appropriate reports to the Parole Board as soon as possible, but in every case prior to the expiration of one-third (1/3) of the total time fixed by the sentencing court. In any case where the misdemeanant has been in preventive custody awaiting trial or sentence, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation shall send the appropriate reports to the Parole Board within twenty (20) days of receipt of the certified copy of the sentence by said Department. The Parole Board shall hear such cases of misdemeanants within thirty (30) days of receipt of the reports from the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Parole Board shall give notice to the misdemeanant as provided in Paragraph 95 of this Settlement Accord, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the hearing.
99. The decision in cases of persons convicted of misdemeanors may not be postponed. The decision granting or denying parole to a person convicted of a misdemeanor shall be made within ten (10) days of the date of the hearing, and within twenty (20) days of the date of the hearing the prisoner shall be notified of the result, and if parole is denied, of the reasons for said denial.
100. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Parole Board will perform all necessary and convenient actions, in accordance with the requirements of all pertinent laws, regulations, and administrative orders, to clear up the backlog of cases for which a decision either granting or denying parole is past due as of the signing of this Settlement Accord.
25

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 26 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
101. Defendants will implement all necessary and convenient monitoring mechanisms to prevent future backlogs and to achieve sustained compliance with this Settlement Accord.
102. As part of the aforementioned monitoring mechanisms, the Parole Board will generate statistics that will assist in monitoring its compliance with this Settlement Accord. The statistics shall allow the Board to ascertain compliance percentages for each provision.
103. As part of the negotiations leading to the October 30, 2009 Stipulation, Docket No. 9678, Defendants adopted, and continue to adopt, policies through regulations and/or administrative orders which specify the circumstances in which the “Living Without Violence” Program, or any other available equivalent violence prevention program provided by a qualified entity, can be required. Only the inmates that meet the criteria to be specified can be required to undergo the program as a condition for the inmates’ case to be processed by the Parole Board, the Classification Committees and any community placement program.
104. Defendants will publish monthly edicts to notify victims of crimes about the pending applications for parole of inmates in which notification is required by Law 90, only cases that are required by law to be published by edict will be published.
105. As part of the October 30, 2009 Stipulation, Docket No. 9678, Defendants have already amended the parole referral form FE-I-1 to confidentially include the identity and contact information of the victims of crimes, where required by Law 90. Moreover, Defendants have also coordinated with the Department of Justice of Puerto Rico, so that during sentencing hearings, state prosecutors recommend to the Courts to
26

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 27 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
advise victims of crimes of the need to notify any changes of their address to the Puerto Rico Parole Board. The parties may continue to explore other options to facilitate the process of identifying and contacting the victims when necessary.
106. The parties agree that the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Parole Board need to hire additional personnel for the enforcement of this Settlement Accord. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and the Parole Board will recruit personnel to fill the following positions:
 An Administrative Assistant for the Clerk’s Office of the Parole Board.
 Four (4) Hearing Officers for the Parole Board.  An Office Clerk for the Office of the Hearing Officers of the Parole
Board.  Two (2) Office Systems Technicians for the Clerk’s Office of the
Parole Board. One will be located in the area of notification to crime victims.  Twenty (20) Records Technicians in the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation.  Thirty (30) Socio-Penal Technicians for the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. 107. The recruitment of said personnel shall begin within a week after the effective date of the Order approving this Accord that may be entered by this Court. 108. The Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation will prepare a report stating the training plan of the new personnel, including a time table for its completion.
27

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 28 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
Also, the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation will prepare a report explaining the assignment of personnel to particular institutions and the reasons justifying it.
Grievance and Dispute Resolution 109. Any and all claims which allege that the Defendants have failed to comply with any of the obligations set forth in this Settlement Accord must be submitted through the DCR inmate grievance process and will be subject to the exhaustion requirements set forth in the PLRA, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a), except for those identified in the next paragraph. 110. There will be two categories of claims that will be exempted from the grievance and exhaustion requirements, to wit: those that contend that Defendants have violated specific provisions of this Settlement Accord, but that do not directly affect the constitutional rights of any individual class member, and those that contend that Defendants are incurring in systemic violations. These two categories of claims will hereinafter be referred to as "the exempted claims". 111. The exempted claims will only be asserted by counsel for the Plaintiff Class pursuant to the following dispute resolution procedure. 112. Counsel for the Plaintiff Class shall serve written notice to the Defendants setting forth the basis of any exempted claim. 113. The Defendants will respond to the Plaintiff Class within twenty (20) days of the receipt of the written notice made by counsel for the Plaintiff Class. 114. The parties will meet within twenty (20) days after Defendants’ response and discuss the allegations of noncompliance in order to reach an agreement, if
28

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 29 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
possible, as to the necessary remedial actions to be taken to resolve the alleged noncompliance.
115. If, after the meeting is held, the parties are unable to reach an agreement, counsel for the Plaintiff Class may then submit the exempted claim for the Court's resolution.
116. The parties further acknowledge and agree that preceding dispute resolution proceedings are settlement negotiations within the confines of Fed.R.Evid. 408.
117. Any claim, whether exempted from the exhaustion requirement or not, that is initiated while the Settlement Accord is in effect, shall continue its regular course until resolved, regardless of whether the Settlement Accord is terminated before the final resolution of such claim.
118. Any situation in which an irreparable damage to the Plaintiff Class is imminent due to systemic violations shall not be subject to the exhaustion requirement or the dispute resolution process and the party may move directly to seek the Court’s intervention. Likewise, if an individual member of the Plaintiff Class demonstrates that compliance with the exhaustion requirement would result in an irreparable harm, the party may move directly to seek the Court’s intervention.
General Provisions 119. The provisions of this Settlement Accord shall, upon entry of this Court’s Order, apply to and be binding upon the Defendants and all employees under their supervision as well as their agents, contractors, successors, and assigns. 120. The purpose of this Settlement Accord is to supersede all of the Orders
29

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 30 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
previously entered by the Court that constitute prospective relief within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 18 U.S.C. §3626, except those that are incorporated as part of this Settlement Accord, and to set forth all of the actions that the Defendants must take to ensure that the minimum constitutional standards are met in each of the areas that are specified herein.
121. The parties concede and agree that this Settlement Accord is narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct any and all outstanding violations of Federal Constitutional Rights, and is the least intrusive means necessary to correct all of those outstanding violations.
122. The Defendants shall provide information to all current and future relevant DCR employees about the terms of this Settlement Accord and this Court’s Order, to the extent necessary for them to carry out their duties, obligations, and responsibilities in accordance to the terms of this Settlement Accord.
123. The Defendants shall maintain sufficient records to document their compliance with all of the requirements of this Settlement Accord.
124. In order to monitor compliance with the obligations set forth in this Settlement Accord, counsel for the Plaintiff Class shall be allowed full access to any correctional institution owned and/or operated by Defendants, in accordance with this Court’s January 31, 1998 Order Regarding Access to Administration of Correction Facilities by Representatives of the Plaintiff Class, Docket No. 6758, which will remain in full effect.
125. Failure by either party to enforce this entire Settlement Accord or any provision thereof, with respect to any deadline or any other provision herein shall not be
30

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 31 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)
construed as a waiver of its right to enforce other deadlines or provisions of this Settlement Accord and/or this Court’s approval Order.
126. Nothing in this Settlement Accord shall be construed as an admission of liability on the part of the Defendants.
127. Nothing in this Settlement Accord constitutes a waiver of rights as to the parties’ respective positions regarding the damages claims and/or the assessed but uncollected fines imposed upon the Defendants.
128. Nothing in this Settlement Accord shall be deemed as an admission that Defendants have incurred in practices that constitute or may constitute a violation of constitutional rights to the plaintiff class or to any individual member of said class.
129. All subheadings in this Settlement Accord are written for convenience of locating individual provisions. If questions arise as to the meanings of individual provisions, the parties shall follow the text of each provision.
130. Upon approval of this Settlement Accord the parties pray that a Partial Final Judgment of the injunctive relief phase be entered.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED at San Juan, Puerto Rico, on this 28th day of June 2012.
31

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10195 Filed 12/13/12 Page 32 of 32
Morales Feliciano v. Fortuño Burset USDC-PR Civil No. 79-4 (PJB-LM)

Counsel for the Plaintiff Class

Counsel for Defendants

S/Guillermo Ramos Luiña GUILLERMO RAMOS LUIÑA USDC-PR 204007 gramlui@yahoo.com
PO Box 22763 UPR Station San Juan, PR 00931-2763 Tel. 787-620-0527 Fax 787-620-0039
S/Steven Lausell Recurt STEVEN LAUSELL RECURT USDC-PR 226402 slausell@gmail.com
S/Tanaira Padilla Rodríguez TANAIRA PADILLA RODRÍGUEZ USDC-PR 227912 tanairapadilla@yahoo.com

GUILLERMO SOMOZA COLOMBANI Attorney General of Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico Department of Justice
IGUINA-OHARRIZ PO Box 366603
San Juan, Puerto Rico 00936-6603 Tels. (787) 641-5012; 641-5013; 641-
5014, 641-5015 Fax (787) 641-5016 E-Mail: carlosiguinaoharriz@gmail.com
S/Carlos R. Iguina Oharriz USDC-PR 210507
S/Arlene R. Pérez Borrero USDC-PR 218207
arperezbo@hotmail.com

PO Box 9023951 San Juan, Puerto Rico 00902-3951 Tel. (787) 977-1525

32

 
 Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 1 of 10
Exhibit 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

MORALES-FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs v.
GARCIA-PADILLA, et al. Defendants

CIVIL NO. 79-4 (PJB-AKJ)

AMENDED PRIVATE SETTLEMENT AND BENEFITS PROPOSAL
TO THE HONORABLE COURT: COME NOW Defendants, through the undersigned attorneys, and very respectfully
SUBMIT the following settlement proposal: Defendants, in an effort to compensate plaintiffs for their damages, and in keeping with
the DCR’s mission of rehabilitation, has been working proposal of benefits for the members of the class who suffered damages while serving sentence in one of the DCR’s institutions and are currently in the free community. To that extent, Defendants have been working closely with several government agencies in devising a benefit package tailored made for the members of the class. Each agency has identified the benefits that each can extend, therefore, in order to show this Honorable Court that Defendants are fully committed to settling this case once and for all, a list of the proposals so far has been included below:

1

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 2 of 10
I. PRIVATE SETTLEMENT PROCESS AND NOTICE
The period of damages extends from 1979 to 2000. The filing of a claim form with adequate proof of incarceration as a pre-trial detainee or a convict shall be required for a claimant to qualify for these benefits.
The class notice program consists of publication in newspapers, postings in prison libraries and living quarters, web postings, toll free information lines and meetings between plaintiffs’ counsel and inmates to ensure notice was received. The Commonwealth shall publish Settlement notice in El Nuevo Dia and Primera Hora, the two largest circulation newspapers in Puerto Rico. The notifications will appear on a full page advertisement, half in English and half in Spanish. English and Spanish language notices will be placed in the library of every penal institution in Puerto Rico. Copies of the Private Settlement Agreement and Benefits Package in both languages will be available in the libraries. Additional copies of the notification and a Spanish translation of the Private Settlement Agreement and Benefits Package will be placed in the living quarters of each penal institution and in community offices. The Commonwealth shall also provide a toll free number that qualified claimants may be able to call and receive information regarding the Settlement in both English and Spanish. The Commonwealth shall also prepare a website that qualified claimants may be able to access and receive information regarding the Private Settlement in both English and Spanish.
Notice and claim forms will be made available through the above mentioned sources in accordance with the Court orders. Qualified claimants will have six (6) months from the approval of this Private Settlement to file a claim form. Claim forms will be made available through the Commonwealth’s website and in designated physical locations throughout the Island.
2

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 3 of 10
Claim forms will no longer be accepted after the six (6) month period to fill out the claim form. The Commonwealth shall conduct a three (3) month verification process. Benefits will be extended after that three (3) month verification process has been concluded.
The Correctional Health Services Corporation will be the administrator of this process. Should the Court authorize it the costs associated with the administration of the claim process will be funded from the fine funds under the custody of the Court.
Any grievance that may arise regarding benefits shall be handled by the Secretary of Justice, person, Agency or entity designated by him. The dispute must be resolved within a period of six (6) months. The decision by the Secretary of Justice or his/her designee will be final and binding.
II. THE GROUPS1: Group A: Qualified claimants incarcerated from 1980 to 1987. They will receive benefits for ten (10) years.
1 Qualified c laimants will be divided in five groups. Inclusion in a group will depend on how much time was spent incarcerated during the period of damages. In order to qualify for the benefits under Groups A, B, and C of this settlement Proposal, a cla imant must have been incarcerated for a minimu m of six (6) months. In order to qualify for the benefits under Group D (d ivided into D1 and D2), a claimant must have b een a pre-trial detainee for less than six (6) months but more than forty-eight (48) hours. In order to qualify for the benefits under Group E a claimant must be currently incarcerated.
3

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 4 of 10
Group B: Qualified claimants incarcerated from 1988 to 1994. They will receive benefits for five (5) years and. Group C: Qualified claimants incarcerated from 1995 to 2000. They will receive benefits for one (1) year. Group D1: Qualified claimants incarcerated after 1980 and before 1987 for less than six (6) months but more than forty-eight (48) hours. They will receive benefits for one (1) year. Group D2: Qualified claimants incarcerated after 1987 for less than six (6) months but more than forty-eight (48) hours. They will receive benefits for six (6) months. Group E: Qualified claimants under groups A-D who are currently incarcerated shall receive the benefits in III L in accordance with the amount of time allocated for Groups A-D.
4

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 5 of 10
III. BENEFITS PROPOSAL2 A. University of Puerto Rico
The UPR has eleven (11) Campuses throughout the Island. Each of those 11 Campuses offers the Continuous Education and Professional Studies Division Program. Said program offers short courses in subjects such as Computers, Entrepreneurship, Languages, Culinary Arts, Accounting Skills (Basic and Advance) and Health Plan Billing, among others. The program offers up to two hundred (200) of these courses each semester. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging course fees and shall reserve up to three (3) seats per course for qualified claimants.
B. Department of Education a. The Department of Education runs a postsecondary education program which
forms part of the Office of Occupational and Technical Education. The program is offered in Guayama, Manatí, Ponce and San Juan. Said Institutes offers associate degrees in areas such as: business administration, graphic arts, technology, environmental quality and nursing. Course sizes range from 15 to 30 students. There are no space limitations for qualified claimants.
b. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging registration fees to qualified claimants.
2 The list will be organized by agency follo wed its proposal. The benefits will be e xtended differently to qualified claimants depending of the time served during the period of damages.
5

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 6 of 10
C. Department of Sports and Recreation a. The Puerto Rican Institute for the Development of Sport and Recreation offers
sixty (60) courses per semester. Thirty (30) of these are basic and the other thirty (30) are specialized courses. The courses are offered in San Juan and the Mayaguez Regional Office. The institute offers the following courses:
i. Recreational Leadership Course (2 courses per semester) – 25 spaces are declared as reserved per course for qualified claimants.
ii. Sport Official Course (2 courses per semester) – 25 spaces are declared as reserved per course for qualified claimants.
iii. Functional Exercises Course (1 course per semester) – 25 spaces are declared as reserved per course for qualified claimants.
b. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging more than fifty percent (50%) of the courses cost.
D. Department of Housing The Housing Department currently has a Construction Materials Aid Program and a
Housing Rehabilitation program. The Materials Aid Program came into effect after September 18th, 1989. The program can be funded by Executive Orders and self- generating funds. Housing Rehabilitation program is funded by legislative assignments. The Commonwealth shall give declaratory relief as first priority to qualified claimants who wish to participate in any of these programs.
6

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 7 of 10
E. Department of Health a. The Department of Health is the government agency in charge of issuing birth
certificates. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging fees pursuant to the issuance a yearly birth certificate to qualified claimants.
b. The Department of Health will also offer all of the services provided by the Centers of Prevention and Treatment of Transmissible Disease under the coverage of “Mi Salud3”. The centers are located in Arecibo, Bayamon, Caguas, Humac ao, Carolina, San Juan, Fajardo, Mayaguez and Ponce. Deductible charges vary between Health Care Providers. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging deductible charges to qualified claimants who visit these clinics.
F. National Parks Company The National Parks Company rent villas or bungalows property of the Company’s
vacation centers. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging more than seventy five percent (75%) for rent of the Company’s vacation centers to qualified claimants. The Commonwealth is also enjoined from charging more than fifty (50%) percent of the entry fee to public areas under the management of the National Parks Company for qualified claimants.
G. Metropolitan Bus Administration The Commonwealth, through The Metropolitan Bus Authority ascribed to the
Department of Transportation and Public Works, is enjoined from charging more than fifty
3 Mi Salud is the Govern ment issued health insurance plan.
7

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 8 of 10
percent (50%) of its normal tariff, to wit, a tariff of thirty five cents (.35¢) for public transportation (bus) for qualified claimants.
H. Puerto Rico Fire Department The Commonwealth, through The Puerto Rico Fire Department, is enjoined from
charging qualified claimants more than fifty percent (50%) discount in the permits issued by the Bureau of Fire Prevention. Also, the PRFD is enjoined from charging not more than fifty percent (50%) in courses offered by the Training Bureau to qualified claimants. Also, the PRFD will declare five (5) spaces for qualified claimants who want to participate in said courses.
I. Department of State The Department of State is the government agency that registers brands (Trademarks)
and Copyrights in the Commonwealth as established by the Regulations of Rights to Charge for Services in the Trademark Registry. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging brand registration costs to qualified claimants. This benefit will enter into effect as soon as the Department of States amends its regulations.
J. Office of Management and Budget The Permits Management Office will perform the Health and Fire Department
inspections at commercial businesses in order to obtain the final certifications when applying for a Use Permit. The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging the certificate's costs to qualified applicants.
8

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 9 of 10
K. Department of Agriculture The Department of Agriculture and the agencies under its umbrella have entered (and
will enter) into agreements with the Department of Correction and Rehabilitation. So that the Commonwealth will declare priority of placement in these programs to qualified claimants still incarcerated.
L. Department of Correction and Rehabilitation The Commonwealth is enjoined from charging more than 85% of the list price charges of
the provisions available at commissaries operated by or for the Department of Correction and Rehabilitation.
This Honorable Court should note that Defendants and Plaintiffs are fully cooperating in good faith to ensure the resolution of this case. It is now a top priority for the Government of Puerto Rico to reach a favorable end, for both parties, once and for all.
As the Court might be aware, the Commonwealth is going through economic challenges that might entail the fusion and even privatization of agencies. In the event that this happens, dispositions will be made in order to ensure that the offers in this proposal continue to be a binding obligation for the agency.
In no event shall the provisions of this settlement be extended more than ten (10) years from the Court’s approval of the Private Settlement.
WHEREFORE, Defendants very respectfully request from that this most Honorable Court accept their Private Settlement and Benefits Package proposal.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED. 9

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10483-1 Filed 03/30/15 Page 10 of 10

In San Juan, Puerto Rico, this 30th day of March 2015.

For Defendants:
HON. CESAR R. MIRANDA Secretary of Justice
MARTA ELISA GONZALEZ Y. Deputy Secretary of Justice For Litigation

S/ Gerardo A. De-Jesus-Annoni Gerardo A. De-Jesus-Annoni USDC-PR No. 212209 Department of Justice Commonwealth of Puerto Rico P.O. Box 9020192 San Juan, PR 00902-0192 787-721-7700 ext. 2111 Fax: 787-722-4440 dejes usa no nni@ gma il.co m
S/Joseph G. Feldstein-Del Valle
Joseph G. Feldstein-Del Valle
USDC-PR No. 230808 Federal Litigation Division Department of Justice P.O. Box 9020192 San Juan, PR 00902-0192 Office (787) 721-2900 x. 2606 Fax. (787) 723-9188 jfe ld ste in@ justic ia.pr. go v
S/ ARLENE R. PÉREZ BORRERO ARLENE R. PÉREZ BORRERO USDC-PR #218207 Pérez Borrero & Associates Law Offices, PSC. P.O. Box 1866 Luquillo, PR 00773 Tel. (787)378-4369/Cel. (787)316-1183 arperezbo@hotmail.com

10

 
 Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10586 Filed 04/01/16 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Carlos Morales Feliciano, et al. v.
Alejandro García Padilla, et al.

Civil No. 79-004(PJB)

O R D E R On March 31, 2016, the parties submitted a joint motion requesting that the claims period begin on May 15, 2016. See Doc. No. 10585. Pursuant to that motion, the six-month claims period shall run from May 15, 2016 until November 15, 2016. Upon agreement by the parties, at least seven days before May 15, 2016, plaintiffs shall (1) publish notice of the claims period via full-page advertisements in El Nuevo Dia and Primera Hora, the two largest circulation newspapers in Puerto Rico, and (2) take the notice website live. Plaintiffs shall post the claims form on the notice website. In addition, at least seven days prior to May 15, 2016, defendants shall post notice of the commencement of the claims period and claims forms in the libraries and living quarters of every penal institution in Puerto Rico. All of the above-described notice methods shall (1) be in both English and Spanish, (2) state the claims period, (3)

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10586 Filed 04/01/16 Page 2 of 2 explain where a claimant can find a claims form, and (4) describe how, and to whom, claimants should submit their claims form. The parties may seek reimbursement for performing these steps by requesting a disbursement of fine funds, supported by relevant invoices.
SO ORDERED. /s/Paul Barbadoro Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge Sitting by Designation
April 1, 2016 cc: Counsel of Record
2

 
 Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10590 Filed 05/09/16 Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Carlos Morales Feliciano, et al. v.
Alejandro García Padilla, et al.

Civil No. 79-004(PJB)

O R D E R The court has before it the Motion for Approval of Media Expert and Campaign filed by the plaintiff class (doc. no. 10589). The parties have determined that it will be necessary to implement a media campaign in order to ensure that class members receive proper notice of the benefits they are entitled to receive under the settlement. Plaintiffs' counsel has consulted with several possible service providers who will be able to implement the campaign. He has submitted for approval by the court a contract between Despacho Jurídico Ramos Luiña, LLC (“Ramos LLC”) and Lopito, Ileana Howie, Inc. (“LIH”). He has submitted copies of campaign designed by LIH (doc. no. 10589-1) and the contract executed by the Ramos LLC and LIH (doc no. 10589-2). Defendants' counsel have been consulted and agree that the proposed services and contract are reasonable and appropriate.

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10590 Filed 05/09/16 Page 2 of 2

The court has reviewed the proposal and has determined that the

notification plan should be paid for with fine funds because it

is reasonable, appropriate, and in the interests of the class.

Therefore, the court GRANTS the motion. The contract

between the Ramos LLC and LIH and the notification campaign are

approved.

The contract provides that LIH will advance funds to

purchase media spots and will then submit invoices to the Ramos

LLC for payment within thirty days. The Ramos LLC shall submit

to the court any requests for reimbursement within two weeks of

paying an invoice.

The Budget Summary provided by LIH at page 28 of the Media

Campaign (doc. no. 10589-1) breaks down the total estimate into

five broad categories. If plaintiffs’ counsel anticipates that

any bill will cause these budget estimates to be exceeded,

counsel shall file a motion to exceed the budget and proposed

amended budget after conferring with defendants’ counsel.

SO ORDERED.

May 6, 2016 cc: Counsel of Record

_/_s/_P_a_u_l _B_ar_b_a_do_r_o______ Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge Sitting by Designation

 
 Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 1 of 15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Carlos Morales Feliciano, et al. v.
Alejandro Garcia Padilla, et al.

Civil No. 79-cv-04 (PB)

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
More than thirty years ago, a group of inmates incarcerated in Puerto Rico’s prisons brought this class action lawsuit challenging the conditions of their confinement. During the course of the litigation, the court found defendants in contempt on multiple occasions, and required Puerto Rico to pay hundreds of millions of dollars in fines. The court collected some, but not all, of the fines, and used the bulk of that money to benefit the plaintiff class in various ways. It also assessed, but did not collect, more than $140,000,000 in additional contempt fines.
In this Memorandum and Order, I explain how I will dispose of the remaining fines.

I. BACKGROUND This litigation began in the 1970s, when a group of inmates incarcerated in Puerto Rico’s prisons brought a sweeping

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 2 of 15
constitutional challenge to their conditions of confinement. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 497 F. Supp. 14, 18-19 (D.P.R. 1979). In 1979, the district court determined that then-existing prison conditions violated plaintiffs’ constitutional rights. Id. at 18. The court consequently issued a preliminary injunction, which required defendants to address some of the worst problems, including overcrowding, inadequate healthcare, and inmate abuse. Id. at 39-41.
In the years that followed, the district court became increasingly frustrated with ongoing problems in the prisons, and with defendants’ noncompliance with court orders. Therefore, in 1986, the court appointed two monitors to report on prison conditions, and to recommend remedial actions. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F. Supp. 591, 621 (D.P.R. 1986). With the monitors’ help, the court issued a series of orders over the ensuing years requiring defendants to improve conditions, holding defendants in contempt for failing to comply with those orders, and assessing multimillion dollar contempt fines. See, e.g., Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 754 F. Supp. 942, 951 (D.P.R. 1991) (ordering a daily fine of $10 per prisoner whenever an inmate was held in less than 55 square feet of living space and ordering the fine to increase by $5 per month per prisoner); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 697 F. Supp. 37, 51 (D.P.R. 1988) (imposing a
2

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 3 of 15
$50 per day fine for each inmate in excess of capacity); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 697 F. Supp. 26, 36 (D.P.R. 1987) (ordering the Governor, Administrator of Correction, and members of the Parole Board to pay $50,000 in sanctions and a daily fine of $10 per inmate living in an institution where the population exceeded capacity). During the ensuing years, the court assessed and collected hundreds of millions of dollars in fines (the “Collected Fines”).
The court also assessed, but did not collect, more than $140 million in additional fines (the “Uncollected Fines”). See Doc. No. 10318-2. With several exceptions, including a $10 million fine assessed in 2000, Doc. No. 7791, the court stopped assessing fines in the early 1990s. In addition, pursuant to a December 1991 stipulation by the parties, the court suspended fine collections. See Doc. Nos. 3413 at 7 (“[D]efendants’ obligation to pay fines imposed pursuant to the court’s prior orders in this cause . . . shall be suspended . . . .”); 3575 (order approving stipulation). Thereafter, the Court Monitors continued to issue reports assessing fines, and the court continued to review and approve those reports, but the court “provisionally suspend[ed] defendants’ obligation of payment.” Doc. No. 3413 at 7; see, e.g., Doc. Nos. 3755; 3814; 3843; 3851; 3894 (suspending specific contempt payments).
The December 1991 stipulation further provided that, if 3

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 4 of 15
defendants substantially complied with the stipulation’s provisions aimed at reducing overcrowding for six consecutive months, “the fines calculated for that six-month period shall be permanently discharged.” Doc. No. 3413 at 7. But, if defendants did not substantially comply with the stipulation, plaintiffs could “move the court for execution for any fines calculated and assessed.” Id. The court, meanwhile, retained the “discretion” to “order the execution of such amount of fines, if any, it deem[ed] appropriate.” Id. Defendants subsequently filed motions to discharge fines assessed during particular six-month periods, Doc. Nos. 3922; 4320, but voluntarily withdrew those motions pursuant to a later stipulation. See Doc. Nos. 4477 at 3; 4494 (court approving stipulation).
In most cases, contempt fines are paid to the United States Treasury. See Winner Corp. v. H. A. Caesar & Co., 511 F.2d 1010, 1015 (6th Cir. 1975) (“Coercive civil contempt fines in federal courts are ordinarily paid to the United States.”). In this case, however, the district court retained control of the fine funds, and issued numerous orders directing the expenditure of those monies to benefit the plaintiff class. The parties ultimately acquiesced in the district court’s actions, and the First Circuit Court of Appeals permitted this use of fine funds. See Morales Feliciano v. Rullan, 378 F.3d 42, 47 (1st Cir.
4

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 5 of 15
2004); Morales-Feliciano v. Parole Bd. of P.R., 887 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir. 1989) (noting that “the fine money has been deposited in an interest-bearing account, and the district court may decide to use it to help defray” costs related to decreasing overcrowding). Accordingly, “the law of this case includes a legal determination that the court has the power to direct the expenditure of fine funds to correct problems that led to the imposition of the fines.” Doc. No. 9962 at 8.
The district court put the Collected Fines to various uses. The court awarded tens of millions of dollars, for example, to the Correctional Health Services Corporation, a non-profit entity created to improve inmate healthcare. See Morales Feliciano v. Rullan, 378 F.3d at 46-47. The court also disbursed fine funds to pay plaintiffs’ legal fees, and to finance a legal services corporation that worked on plaintiffs’ behalf.1 See Doc. No. 7710 at 4 (“The Court finds that the funds expended on financing the [legal services] Corporation are necessary to the remediation process, in eliminating the underlying causes of this case, and contribute significantly to the public interest in the administration of justice.”). As a result of these programs, and the court’s other orders,
1 Between 1997 and August 2011, the legal services corporation received approximately $40 million in fine funds. See Doc. No. 9962 at 1.
5

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 6 of 15
conditions in Puerto Rico’s prisons steadily improved. See Doc. No. 10541 at 1 (“Although work remains to be done, this litigation has brought about real improvements for those incarcerated in Puerto Rico.”).
I was assigned this case in 2011. In 2012, I entered a consent decree that replaced all prior orders and decrees, and resolved all of plaintiffs’ outstanding claims for prospective equitable relief. See Doc. No. 10196 at 5. That decree aimed to transition the court away from its longstanding involvement in the day-to-day operation of Puerto Rico’s prisons. Id. at 1. But, it did not resolve issues related to monetary damages, or dispose of the fine funds. See id. at 5. Moreover, by its terms, the consent decree was judicially enforceable for only two years, and expired without objection at the end of 2014. See Doc. No. 10525 at 3.
The parties therefore continued to pursue a final resolution to their dispute, and, in May 2015, reached a private settlement agreement. See Doc. No. 10483-1. Pursuant to that agreement, defendants must provide various benefits to members of the plaintiff class who were incarcerated between 1980 and 2000. Id. at 3-4. Benefits include educational opportunities, lower-cost healthcare services, and discounts on vacation rentals, public transportation, and certain government permits. Id. at 5-9. The agreement does not, however, provide for
6

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 7 of 15
individualized monetary relief, or address the fine funds. The agreement calls for a six-month claims period, during which time class members can submit claims for benefits.
I granted the parties’ joint motion for final approval of the proposed settlement agreement in November 2015. See Doc. No. 10541. The six-month claims period began on May 15, 2016, and runs until November 15, 2016. See Doc. No. 10586. As of the date of this order, the claims process is ongoing.
I have continued to authorize the use of fine funds since becoming involved with this suit. For example, consistent with the prior court’s practice, I disbursed fine funds to implement an updated medical records system. See, e.g., Doc. Nos. 10001-1 at 4; 10003. I have reviewed attorney invoices, and used fine funds to reimburse counsel for qualifying legal work done on plaintiffs’ behalf. See, e.g., Doc. Nos. 10478; 10479; 10480. I have approved the use of fine funds for consulting services, including services rendered during settlement negotiations. See, e.g., Doc. Nos. 10364 (granting request for $26,229.32 for consulting services performed by Dr. James Austin, an expert in inmate classification); 10565 (order regarding distribution of funds to Professor Francis McGovern, one of the two special settlement masters). And, more recently, I have granted properly-supported requests to reimburse expenses incurred in winding up the case, and in notifying class members of their
7

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 8 of 15
potential entitlements under the settlement agreement. See, e.g., Doc. Nos. 10576 (granting motion to disburse $12,998.32 to plaintiffs’ counsel for file storage and destruction expenses); 10615 (disbursing $8,691.72 for translation costs and notice publication in local newspapers).
III. ANALYSIS Significant funds nonetheless remain. As of the date of this Memorandum and Order, the court controls approximately $4,500,000.00 in Collected Fines.2 Puerto Rico owes an additional $140,626,100 in Uncollected Fines. Of that approximately $140 million, $20 million is being held in a segregated “guaranty account” with the Governmental Development Bank. Doc. No. 10318-2 at 2. A. Parties’ Proposals With this litigation nearing its long-awaited conclusion, in February 2016, I invited the parties to submit proposals for the disposition of the remaining fine funds. Doc. No. 10561.
2 This figure is an approximation, and does not reflect expenditures that the court will make between now and the time that judgment is entered. For instance, I have approved the use of Collected Fines to implement a media campaign during the claims period, to ensure that class members receive adequate notice of their potential entitlements. See Doc. No. 10590. Moreover, the parties may incur additional expenses in winding up this case that should be reimbursed.
8

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 9 of 15
Plaintiffs submitted their memorandum in May 2016.3 See Doc. No.
10592. Defendants responded with their own suggestions. See
Doc. No. 10594. I held a status conference on July 26, 2016 to
discuss the parties’ recommendations. See Doc. No. 10622.
In their submission, plaintiffs suggest several
investments, totaling $140 million, to be credited against the
Uncollected Fines. Doc. No. 10592 at 1-2. These investments
include finishing the Correctional Medical Center, continuing to
update the prisons’ electronic medical record system, installing
an electronic surveillance system in correctional facilities,
funding a nonprofit legal services foundation, and building a
new women’s prison. Id. at 2. Plaintiffs do not, however,
“make any concrete proposal about the disposition of” the
Collected Fines. Id. at 1 n.1.
Defendants do not address the Collected Fines either. See
Doc. No. 10594. With respect to the Uncollected Fines,
3 In September 2015, plaintiffs’ counsel submitted a “motion for attorney’s fees.” Doc. No. 10529. According to that motion, although “[n]either the undersigned nor any other attorney has demanded or is seeking fees for the services provided in the lengthy and time consuming process that resulted in the” settlement agreement, plaintiffs’ counsel requested $7.5 million, presumably from Collected Fines, to be “used exclusively as seed money to fund a not for profit entity that will provide services to incarcerated persons in the future.” Id. Plaintiffs reiterated this same suggestion in their May 2016 memorandum. See Doc. No. 10592 at 2 (requesting $7,500,000.00 to “[f]und a not for profit foundation that will provide legal services to inmates”). Accordingly, I address only plaintiffs’ May 2016 filing here.
9

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 10 of 15
defendants request a $70 million credit for the construction of the Correctional Medical Center. Id. at 1. The defendants further suggest that the Department of Correction and Rehabilitation spend the $20 million currently held in the “guaranty account” to expand electronic supervision within the Commonwealth’s correctional facilities, “as well as for other purposes that will benefit the inmates within the correctional system.” Id. at 2. As to the remaining Uncollected Fines, defendants propose “a yearly expenditure of $10,000,000 earmarled [sic] within the budget of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitations.” Id. B. Disposition
Having carefully considered the parties’ recommendations, I order the following. The Collected Fines that remain in the court’s control after all remaining expenses have been satisfied shall be paid to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Commonwealth will hold those monies, and the $20 million now in the guaranty account, in a segregated account. The Commonwealth shall use those funds within the next three years for new capital and non-capital expenditures -- above and beyond what is otherwise appropriated for the Department of Correction and Rehabilitation -- that benefit inmates in Puerto Rico’s correctional system.
10

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 11 of 15
At least ninety days before the Commonwealth intends to expend funds from this account, it shall submit a memorandum to the district court describing the proposed expenditure, and explaining how the project would benefit inmates. The plaintiff class will have an opportunity to respond to the Commonwealth’s submission. The court will then consider any objections, and either approve or reject the Commonwealth’s proposal. The court’s role, however, will be limited to determining whether the planned expenditure is consistent with this Memorandum and Order, and will benefit the Commonwealth’s inmates.
Beyond these instructions, I decline to micro-manage the Commonwealth’s use of these funds. The time has come to close this case. See Morales Feliciano v. Rullan, 378 F.3d at 60 (urging the district court, in 2004, to “extricat[e] itself from the toils of this litigation”). The parties have identified several projects -- including purchasing and installing additional electronic surveillance equipment, and miscellaneous infrastructure repairs and improvements -- that may be appropriate uses of the segregated fine funds. See Doc. Nos. 10592; 10594. At this stage, however, the Commonwealth has regained control of the day-to-day operation of its prisons, and is best suited to decide how to use these additional funds. Therefore, subject to plaintiffs’ input and limited judicial involvement, these decisions should be left to the Commonwealth.
11

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 12 of 15
With respect to the remaining Uncollected Fines, I decline to collect them at this late stage in the litigation. First, defendants are entitled to a $70 million credit for the construction of the Correctional Medical Center, the “modern, high-security medical facility” that was created to “address current and recurring shortcomings related to inmates’ access to medical care . . . .” Doc. No. 9888 at 1-2. The prior district court indicated that “all monies paid for construction, purchase of equipment, payment of contractors, subcontractors, consultants and financing of the [Correctional Medical Center] project shall be offset or credited against the assessed and uncollected fines . . . .” Id. at 3. In their recent memorandum, the defendants represented that the Center “was built and furnished at a total cost of $70,000,000.” Doc. No. 10594 at 1. Based upon that representation, and the court’s previous orders, it is appropriate to credit $70 million against the Uncollected Fines for the Center’s construction.
Second, collecting the remaining $50 million in Uncollected Fines would not serve the principal purpose for which the fines were assessed. The judge previously assigned to this case imposed contempt fines largely to compel defendants to comply with the court’s orders, and to speed improvements at Puerto Rico’s prisons. See, e.g., Morales Feliciano v. Rosello Gonzalez, 124 F. Supp. 2d 774, 785 (D.P.R. 2000) (“The real
12

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 13 of 15
purpose of a civil contempt order is purely remedial — to coerce obedience to a decree passed in complainant's favor, or to compensate complainant for loss caused by respondent's disobedience of such decree.”); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 775 F. Supp. 477, 487 (D.P.R. 1991) (“This court . . . is firmly convinced of the need to continue sanctions at least at their current level if compliance with its orders is ever to be achieved.”). Since the court assessed those fines several decades ago, however, the deplorable prison conditions that gave rise to the court’s orders have improved. Moreover, the court’s prior orders are no longer judicially enforceable, and the parties’ settlement agreement resolved all of plaintiffs’ claims. As such, it is no longer necessary to coerce defendants to follow the court’s orders.
The parties’ December 1991 stipulation underscores this point. Pursuant to that stipulation, the parties agreed to suspend fine collection, and further agreed that defendants could “permanently discharge[]” their obligation to pay certain fines if they “substantially compli[ed]” with the stipulation’s provisions intended to reduce overcrowding. Doc. No. 3413 at 7. These provisions suggest that, according to the parties, it would be unnecessary to collect fines if defendants satisfied their contractual, and constitutional, obligation to improve prison conditions. Although that process has taken several
13

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 14 of 15
decades, conditions have improved. Third, collecting the Uncollected Fines would further delay
the conclusion of this case. Particularly given the Commonwealth’s current financial straits, collecting and disbursing the outstanding $50 million in Uncollected Fines would likely be a difficult and time-consuming process.4 That process would require continued judicial involvement in, and interference with, the Commonwealth’s governance. That kind of ongoing oversight is inconsistent with the First Circuit’s instructions to end this litigation. Therefore, in light of these considerations, and given the totality of the circumstances of this case, it is appropriate to cancel defendants’ obligation to pay these remaining Uncollected Fines.
IV. CONCLUSION For the foregoing reasons, the court orders that the Collected Fines that remain in the court’s control after all remaining expenses have been satisfied shall be paid to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Commonwealth will hold those monies, and the $20 million now in the guaranty account, in a segregated account. The Commonwealth shall use those funds
4 It is appropriate to treat the $20 million currently held in the “guaranty account” differently, because the Commonwealth has already set that money aside in the guaranty account.
14

Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10625 Filed 08/23/16 Page 15 of 15
within the next three years for new capital expenditures that benefit inmates in Puerto Rico’s correctional system. At least ninety days before the Commonwealth intends to expend funds from this account, it shall submit a memorandum to the district court describing the proposed expenditure, and explaining how the project would benefit inmates. The court will then consider any objections, and either approve or reject the Commonwealth’s proposal. It is further ordered that the Commonwealth’s obligation to pay the remaining Uncollected Fines is cancelled.
To the extent that they are inconsistent with this Memorandum and Order, the parties’ motions, Doc. Nos. 10529, 10592, 10594, are denied.
SO ORDERED.

August 23, 2016 cc: Counsel of Record

/s/Paul Barbadoro Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge

15

 
 Case 3:79-cv-00004-PJB-AKJ Document 10628 Filed 09/02/16 Page 1 of 1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO

Carlos Morales Feliciano, et al.
v.

- ')

=:---.:>

; ~) 14 1

'.

I

Case No. 79-cv-04 (PB) ~ ,

,'~
/)

Alejandro Garcia Padilla, et al.

J
(.J)

--<

I

. :.J

r-..)

JUDGMENT

. (-- 'I
: ('")
J--=") ~ ·.

-·0
0.)

Judgment is hereby entered in accordance with the following: ·

)

.

:

0 -I

lc

l-)

.•...:o:>

J
;,-I

,f-t.-

.:... n.
C"

~
/
C"

"2~· I nl
C'

1.

A Memorandum and Order dated December 13, 2012, approving a Consent

Decree, dated June -28, 2012, and filed with the court on December 13, 2012, replacing all prior

orders and consent decrees in the case and resolving all equitable relief claims.

2. A Memorandum and Order dated November 30, 2015, as amended by Order dated January 29, 2016, approving the parties' Settlement Agreement resolving all monetary damage claims; and

3.

A Memo randum and Order dated August 23, 2016, specifying the disposition of

collected and uncollected fine funds.Pursuant to this Memorandum and Order, the collected

fine funds that remain in the court's control after all previously identified expenses have been

satisfied shall be paid to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Commonwealth will hold

those monies, and the $20 million now in a guaranty account, in a segregated account, and

shall use those funds _within the next three years for new expenditures that benefit inmates in

Puerto Rico's correctional system. The Commonwealth's obl igation to pay the remaining

uncollected fines is cancelled.

Dated: September 1, 2016 cc : counsel of record

Fra ces Rios de Moran Clerk of Court
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Is/ Paul Barbadoro
Paul Barbadoro United States District Judge

 
 Ho. 88-1942

UNITED STATES COUET OP APPEALS FOR THE FIEST CIRCUIT
SIP
CARLOS MORALES FELICIANO, ET AL., Plaintiffs, Appellees.
v.
PAROLE BOARD OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, ET AL.,
Defendants, Appellants.

JUDGMENT Entered] September 26, 1989 This cause came on the heard on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Puerto Rico, and was argued by couosel. Upon consideration whereof, It is now here ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows: The judgment of the district Court is affirmed.
By the Court:
Clerk.

Feliciano v. Parole Board of Puerto Rico PC-PR-001-001
[cciMessrs. Martin, Garcia-Gutierrer)

RCV BY:u S DISTRICT iOURT ?P 9-2s-o« ; 9:28AM ".

T Q3*

4 P6 8803723427Q;* 2

United States Court of Appeals

^

Forthe First Circuit

Ho. 88-1942

CARLOS MORALES-FELICIANO, ET AL.,
Plaintiffs, Appellees,
v.
PAROLE BOARD OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF PUERTO RICO, IT AL.,
Defendants, Appellants.

5
"~r CD

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hen. Juan M. Perez-diaenes, P.a. District

Before Breyer and Selya, circuit and Caffrey,* Senior Dlatrlet Judgf.

A. Manual Marggin with vhoa Mareoyy A

Lavandaro and Ramlraz

war* on brief for appellants*

Carlo* VV. Careiia-Qlutlarraq wiith vhoa Jo»e B. Faraand.fg-Sain and Lav

Qfticmm of Wflghl*" * g*rnaTMl*K-fl*tn vere on brief for appellee.

»

8IPTIMBI1 26, X989

"Of the District of Massachusetts, sitting by designation.

RCV BY:u S DISTRICT COURT Pi 9-28-89 I 9:27AM J

C T 33-

808723A270:# 3

BREYER, Circuit Judoa. Officials of the

commonwealth of Puerto Rico, responsible for tha

Commonwealth's prison system (the "Commonwealth"), appeal two

'

i

orders that the district court entered in July and August 1988

t

in a wprison conditions" case, a case which began about 10

years ago and which has involved findings of

unconstitutionally poor-prison conditions, agreed stipulations

about a time table for improvement and the building of

'

i

considerable new prison capacity. The district court has

j

t

appointed monitors; it has imposed sanctions designed to

produce compliance with the time tables; and, in July and

August 1988 it (1) ordered the Ponce District Jail closed and

(2) increased the fines imposed as sanctions for failure to

meet certain parts of the time table. Initially the

Commonwealth appealed from both these orders. By the time of

oral argument, it had closed the Ponce District Jail, and it

therefore abandoned that portion of the appeal. It continues,

however, to press its appeal of the district court's August

1968 order significantly increasing the fines it must pay for

each month that it keeps prisoner* confined in less than 35

square feet of space per prisoner. Having reviewed the record

in this case, we conclude that the district court's order is

lawful.

-2-

RCV BY'.U S DISTRICT COURT Pf. 9-28-39 J 9:28AM !

' Cv T Q3-

8097-234270:» 4

I.

Background

To understand the issues the reader should Keep in

mind the following key events in this lengthy litigation;

a(

February 1979. The plaintiffs began their

class action complaining of unconstitutional prison

conditions.

b. fiaf>fcanhar 1980. The district court found that conditions in Puerto Rico's prisons violated the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Among other unlawful features of the system, it found serious overcrowding, with less than 20 square feet of space available for inmates in some prisons. The court entered an order requiring the commonwealth, among other things, to provide enough additional capacity so that, as a temporary, initial matter, every inmate had at least 35 square feet of space* It also required the commonwealth to submit plans for providing at least 55 square feet in dormitories and 70 square feet in individual cells on a permanent basis. Set Moralaa-Faligiano v. Roiatrofi&E&liSi 497 F. Supp. 14, 41 (D. P.R. 1979).

c.

March 1986. The district court found that the

Commonwealth's prisons still did not comply with the

Constitution. Citing "lengthy noncompllance [with the

court'i 1980 order] by defendants," Moralas-Faliclano

V. Romaro-Barcalo. 672 F. Supp. 591, 622 (D. P.R.

1986), the court appointed monitors, who looked into

prison conditions and met with the parties.

dt

g#pfcs;flber 1986 * January 1987. In September

the parties entered into a "stipulation** that the

Commonwealth would meet the "35 square foot" standard

by the end of 1986 and the "55 square foot" standard

by the end of 1987. The court approved the

stipulation in January 1987 and ordered the

Commonwealth to comply with its terms.

e.

July 3,987. Although the Commonwealth built

additional capacity in 1986 and 1987, prison inmate

RCV B Y : u5 - . - r u C T COURT PP 3 - 2 8 - 8 8 ; i - i i A H ;

CP " T Q 3 -

8087234270;* 5

population rose from 5400 to 7000 (between August 1985 and July 1987). In July 1987, tha district court found that tha Commonwealth had not mat tha N35 squara foot** standard. It held tha Commonwaalth in contampt of its September 1980 and January 1987 ordars. It assassad a fina of $50,000 for tha past failure, and a prospactiva fina of $10 par day par inmata for each inmate held in excess of a facility's "35 square foot*1 capacity. (For example, if the Commonwealth held 200 inmates in a facility that could hold 150 giving each prisoner 35 square feet, the fine would be $10 times 50 or $500 per day.) see Morales-Fsliciano v. Harnandeg-Colon. 697 F. Supp. 26 (D. P.R. 1987).

f.

July - September 1987. The Commonwealth,

pointing to the still increasing prison population, asked the court to extend the N35 square foot"

deadline until November 1987, by which time, the

Commonwealth said, it would meet the "35 square foot1*

standard. In mid-September 1987 the court denied the

request. Sea Moralea-Fa1lciano v. Hernandez-Colon,

672 F. Supp. 627 (D. P.R. 1987). In late September

the court, in another order, increased certain fines

(not directly relevant here) and warned the

Commonwealth that it was considering "additional

sanctions."

g.

April 1988. The court, after hearing from the

monitors and the parties, and taking account of

weather-related construction delays, postponed the"5J&

square foot" deadline from the end of 1987 to the end

Off 1988.

h.

July 1988. The district court ordered the

Commonwealth to close the Ponce District Jail (where

conditions were particularly poor) by the end of 1988.

Seefforalaa-Felicianov. Hernandez-Colon. 697 F. Supp.

37 (D. P.R. 1988). The Commonwealth initially opposed

the order, for it feared its new facilities would not

be ready in time. But, by the time of oral argument

on this appeal, the new facilities were ready and the

Commonwealth has closed the Jail.

i.

August 198B. The district court, noting that

the Commonwealth's prisons still did not meet the "IS

foot" standard, increased its "nonconplianca"

-4-

RCV 3Y:U S D . O SICT COURT PF 9-25-53 I 9:29AM ;

C T 33-

3CS723427QI* 8

fine from $10 per sxcsss iroaats per day to $50 per •xctn inmate per day. It also provided that th« fins rats would increase by $10 psr month bsginning in September, so that by April 1989 it would amount to $130 psr excess inmate psr day. If the Commonwealth's counsel's sstinats of 800 to 900 "excess" inmates in April 1989 is correct, the fins for April would havs amounted to $3900 psr excess inmate or $3,510,000. The Commonwealth appeals from this August order.
II. Appealability
The plaintiffs, pointing to authority holding that civil contempt orders are ordinarily "interlocutory," that is, not "final," ££1 28 U.S.C. § 1291, "injunctive," §&& 28 U.S.C. §1292(a)(l), or "collateral," at* Cohan v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.. 337 U.S. 541, 546-47 (1949), argue that the August order is not appealable. See Fox v. Capital Co. . 299 U.S. 105, 107 (1936); 11 C. Wright 6 A. Miller, Faderal Practice fc Procedure* Civil § 2960 at 592 (1973) ("A civil contempt order is interlocutory and, as to a party to ths litigation, an appeal is not available until thsre is a final judgment in the entire action.11) Indeed, the plaintiffs add, the August ordsr is not even a finding of "contempt;1* rather, it is simply an increase in a sanction rslatsd to an earlier finding of contempt (July 1987), and therefore (in plaintiff's view) still lsss "appealable,"
-5-

RCV 3Y:u 5 3i5TRiCT COURT P» 8-29-88 ! 8;33AM ;

Cr T Q3-

aia7234270;« 7

As one court has noted, however, N [exceptions to the rule [that civil contempt orders are not final] are plentiful." Drummond Co. v. District 20. UMW. 59s F.2d 381, 383 (5th Cir. 1979). Those exceptions are all based on the principle that the requirement of finality is to be given a "practical rather than a technical construction," Cohen v. Beneficial Loan Corn.. 337 U.S. at 546. They reflect a weighing of "the inconvenience and costs of piecemeal review on the one hand and the danger of denying justice by delay on the other." £ilAn v. Carliele t Jaccrue).^. 417 U.S. 156, 171 (1974) (quoting Dlckanson v. Petroleum Conversion Corp.. 338 U.S. 507, 511 (1950)).
In this case, to allow appeal threatens neither the "inconvenience" nor the "costs" associated with "piecemeal review." Eiaen. 417 U.S. at 171. See New York Telephone Co, v. Communications Workers of America. 445 F.2d 39, 45 (2d Cir. 1971) (finality determination depends in part on the "risk of disrupting the orderly course of proceedings below"). The appeal does not interrupt a trial on the merits, for any dispute on the merits (either of the constitutional violation or the remedial need to provide more than 35 square feet per prisoner) ended long ago. The district court entered an injunction embodying the "35 square foot" requirement 9 years
-6-

i — i n — i I sit m r~ ii

IT

RCV BY= U S DISTRICT COURT PR , 9-29-88 : 9'.3U» 5

CCi.T Q3-

8097234270:« 9

ago; the Commonwealth stipulated that it would quickly satisfy this requirement more than 2 years ago; there is no reason now to think the Commonwealth will further litigate the merits. Moreover, the issues raised here concern neither the merits of the underlying constitutional questions nor the legal validity of the "35 foot" requirement. Rather, they concern only compliance. See f}ru,mn>fr"4r 599 F.2d at 384 (contempt order reviewable when only issue on appeal was applicability of injunction to allegedly contemptuous conduct); New York Telephone. 445 F.2d at 45 (contempt order reviewable when only issues on appeal were interpretation of restraining order and compliance with that order).
At the same time, to force the Commonwealth to wait for a "final judgment11 to appeal the civil contempt order risks "denying justice by delay." fiiian, 417 U.S. at 171. He have no reason to believe the court intends to enter a further document called "final judgment," at least not in the near future. And, given the nature of the contempt order, the sums of money that, in theory, might be involved several years froa now are so huge, that an appeal at that time would likely prove too late to offer the Commonwealth meaningful relief. Cf. In Re American Colqnlal Broadeaftlnq CorpT. 758 F.2d 794, 803 (1st cir. 1985) (finality requirement does not
-7-

SC* BY = J a -.- moi COURT PR s-^-ss . 9:31AM ;

*. JO

apply when irreparable Injury nay be cauaad by delaying

appellate review until litigation is ovtr).

Thus, v« think the civil contempt order in this casa

resembles* those appaalabla orders where the district court

has entered the contempt order after a final judgment and a

party has appealed seeking review, not of the legal merits of

the basic case, but only of the legal validity of the order

of contempt itself. See Cabrera v. Municipality of Bavamon.

622 P.2d 4, 7 (1st Cir. 1980); Vincent v. Local 294. Int'l

and, of Taamatars, 424 F.2d 124, 128 (2d Cir. 1970); 9 Moore's

I

Federal Practice | 110.13[4], at 168 (1989). Although the

'

district court has not entered a judgment called Mfinal," its

injunction and later decrees are functionally equivalent to

a final determination of the legal merits, for the parties no

longer dispute their legal validity and the district court

seems unlikely to make any further "final11 determination of

the merits in the near future. Since the appealability of a

civil contempt order is a matter of practical, rather than

formal legal, considerations, lfift £sh£n, 337 U.S. at 546, we

conclude that the Commonwealth*s appeal is legally valid.

-8-

RCV 3 Y : U S DISTRICT COURT PR 9-29-89 I 9:32AM :

CO. ," G3*

3097234270;#10

III. The LA<J*\ Mmritm 1. The Commonwealth makes two arguments to back its claim that the district court could not lawfully find it in contempt of the January 1987 order — an order that embodied the Commonwealth's own agreed-upon time schedule for relieving severe prison overcrowding. First, it says that it "substantially complied" with the order, at least in respect to providing each prisoner with at least 35 square feet of space* See Fort j.n v. Oommlaaj.oner of Ma««. Dep't of Pub. Welfare. 692 F.2d 790, 797 (1st Cir. 1982) (assuming, but not deciding, that "substantial compliance1* is sufficient to avoid contempt) ; feji also General alemal Corp^ v. Donallco. Inc.. 787 F.2d 1376, 1379 (9th Cir. 1986) (using a substantial compliance standard). We note, however, that, "substantiality" of compliance depends upon "the nature of the interest at stake and the degree to which noncompliance affects that interest." Forfcin. 693 F.2d at 795. Here, the interest at issue — the prisoner's Eighth Amendment interest — i s "fundamental,• eee Bohln«on v. California. 370 U.S. 660, 666 (1962) (Eighth Amendment is an aspect of Fourteenth Amendment due process); EalXfl v. Connecticut. 302 U.S. 319, 325 (1937)
-9-

RCV BY:j S DISTRi. ^QURT PF 9-29-88 : 9:33AM I

C^ T Q3-»

8037234270:

(Fourteenth Amendment dua procass includes those "principle[a] of justice so rooted in the tradition and conscience of our people as to be ranked as fundamental"); the relevant harm (confinement in an area smaller than 5 by 7 feet) is significant; the number of prisoners suffering that harm (7 to 10 percent of the prison population) is large; and the time since entry of the remedial decree is long. We cannot say that compliance is so "substantial" as to invalidate the finding of contempt. See rortln. 692 F.2d at 797 (affirming contempt order when district court's finding that compliance was not impossible was not clearly erroneous).
Second, the Commonwealth argues that it has made good faith efforts to comply with the remedial order and the court cannot expect it to do better. The Commonwealth points out that, in recent years, it has dramatically increased spending on prisons. (It spent $115 million in 1977-80; $179 million in 1981-84; and $306 million in 1985-88). It has also built far more prison capacity. But, it adds, the growth of prison population from 9400 in August 1985 to 8300 by September 1988 (and to 9200 by April 1989), along with certain weather-related construction delays (which led the district court to postpone the "35 square foot" compliance date), means that overcrowding still exists.
-10-

RCV 3Y=U S DISTRICT COURT PF 9-29-33 ; 9:33A« :

Cr T Q3-

3087234270!#12

"Good faith" afforts, howsvar, do not automatically constituta a sufficiant lagal axcuss for failing to carry out tha district court's ordar. Fort in. 692 F.2d at 796-97 ("Good faith alona is not a dafansa to civil contsmpt. . . , [IImpossibility would ba a dafanaa to contampt, . . . [but] tha tast of impossibility may ba particularly atrict [vhars] tha naads of [tha plaintiffs] ara urgant.") (citations omittad) . Sa,fMcComb v. Jacksonvllla Pataar Co.. 336 U.S. 187, 191 (1949) (HTha absanca of wilfulnasa doas not raliava front Civil contampt."); m also tlr^l-fcad sfcataa v. Bryan. 339 U.S. 323, 330 (1950) (contamnor can dafand against contampt chargas "by proving that ha is unabla to comply11). Tha Commonwaalth has axplainad why complianca bacama mora difficult than it initially anticipatad. But it hat not shown that causas beyond its control hava mada it ovarwhalmingly difficult or anywhara naar impoasibla to giva aach prisonar 35 squara faat of spaca. Tha Commonwaalth has had considarabla tima to maat its salf-impossd deadlina, whathar ona counts from saptambar 1986, whtn it agraad to tha daadlina, or from Novanber 1987, its own proposad "postponamant" data (which tha court rajactad). Tha parcantaga of prisonars still housad in lass than 35 squara faat is modastj it is not claar why tha Commonwaalth could not provida at laast tamporary spaca of
-11-

RCV-BY:u S DISTRICT COURT PR 9-29-89 ; 8:34AM i

CC.i Q3-»

8097234270:#13

sufficient size vhils it builds permanent sxtra capacity. Of course, building sxtra spacs is expensive, but budgetary constraints ordinarily do not/ in and of themselves, provide a legal excuse for noncompliance. Cf. i^r«a.u v. Manson. 651 F.2d 96, 104 (2d Cir. 1981) (state's interest in spending less money on prisons cannot excuse overcrowding).
The Commonwealth points to Nelson v. ColUna. 659 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1981) as authority for the proposition that a circuit court will reverse a contempt finding when a state has exercised "reasonable diligence" in complying with a district court's "prison overcrowding1* decree. But in N«l«on. the district court premised its contsnpt finding on continued overcrowding caused in part by the court's own refusal to allow the stare to "double-cell" some prisoners in another prison. The Fourth Circuit reversed this latter finding, permitting the double-celling, thereby eliminating the overcrowding, and consequently eliminating the contempt. See Nelson. 659 F.2d at 429. Here, the Commonwealth continues to maintain conditions in which significant numbers of prisonsrs are held in less than 35 square feet of space.
In sum, we believe the district court could find that it was within the Commonwealth's power to comply with its own "35 square foot" timetable. That being so, and given the
-12-

RCV 3Y:U S DISTRICT COURT PF 9-28-89 J 9:35AM !

C T 33*

B0872342705IU

extent to which the prison system remained out of compllanes, we believe ths district court could find, in August 1988, that ths Commonwealth had failsd to meet ths court's (and its own) time schedule; that it rsmainsd in contempt; and that further monetary sanctions were appropriate.
2. The Commonwealth also argues that the amount of the sanction assessed (initially $50 per excess prisoner per day, with a rate increase of $10 per month) is unreasonably, and hence unlawfully, high. Since the purpose of the sanction in this case is to induce coapliance with the court order, its reasonableness depends upon "the character and magnitude of the harm threatened by continued contumacy, and the probable effectiveness of any suggested sanction in bringing about the result desired." United states v. UMH. 330 U.S. 258, 304 (1947). The law permits the district court considerable leeway in making this assessment, cahrara v. Municipality of Bayamon. 622 F.2d at 7. Several factors, taken together, lead us to conclude that the fine, though high, is lawful.
First, the threatened harm (providing less than 35 square feet per innate) is serious, particularly in the context of the prison conditions that originally led to this lawsuit, SJUI Moralaa-Faliciano v. Romerft-BarcalQf 497 F. SUpp. at 20-33 (finding a variety of conditions which exacerbated
-13-

RGV BY:U S DISTRICT COURT PK . 9-29-89 ! 9:35AM I

Cw.-T 93-»

8097234270I#15

overcrowding). cf. Id. at 35 (citing 75 squara faat minimum sat by tha American Corractional Inatituta); National Sheriffa Asa'n Handbook on Jail Arehitactura (1975) (70-80 squara feat minimum for single occupancy rooms); National Shariffa Aaa'n Manual on Jail Administration (1970) (55 aquara faat minimum par occupant for aultipla occupant calla); Raport of tha Spacial civilian Committee for tha study of tha United States Army Confinamant Syataa (1970) (55 aquara faat minimum adoptad by tha Army). But cf. Bbfidti v. chapman. 452 U.S. 337, 348 n.13 (1981) (expert opinions ara "helpful and ralavant1* but do not auffica to aatabliah contemporary standards of dacancy). Second, aa of August 1988, a significant number of prisonera (estimated at 600 to 700) ware held under these conditiona. Third, tha Commonwealth itself stipulated that it would meet tha minimal 35 squara foot standard by December of 1986, and than argued that, in any event, it could meet it by November of 1987. Fourth, the delays in meeting the standard have bean many and serious. They have led the diatrict court to impose sanctiona, and than to warn of aarious further sanctions. Fifth, the Commonwealth has not demonstrated any special reason that would lead us to think it cannot meat the "35 square foot11 standard. Sixth, the finea, though ateep, are geared to the extent of
-14-

RCV BY:u 5 OiSTRlST COURT P' 9-28-88 ; 3:33AM ;

C T 33*

8087234270;#18

noncompliance, and they should diminish rapidly as th« Commonwealth builds additional spac* or employs tsnporary altsrnativss. Seventh, ths fins sonsy has been dspositsd in an interest-bsaring account, and ths district court may decide to us« it to hslp dsfray rslsvant costs.
3. Ths Commonwealth arguss that ths court issusd its August order without ths prior hsaring that ths lav requires* See Washington Metro. Area Transit Agth. v. Amalgamated Transit Union. Wat. Capital Local Div. 689, 531 F.2d 617, 620 (D.c. cir. 1976) (civil contsanors who asssrt a gsnuins issus of matsrlal fact havs a right to a full, impartial hsaring); Brotherhood of Locomotive Firsmsn and
man v. Banoor t Arooatook R.R. Co.. 380 F.2d 570, 578 (D.C. Cir.) (sams), esrt. dsnlad. 389 U.S. 327 (1967). W« havs hsld bsfors, in analogous circuastancss, "that in csrtain ssttings a matter can adsquatsly ba 'hsard' on ths papsrs . . . . [if] givsn ths naturs and circumstances of ths cass, . . . ths parties ha[d} a fair opportunity to present relevant facts and arguments to ths court, and to counter the opponent's submissions[.]" Aouds v. Mobil Oil Corp.. 862 F.2d 890, 894 (1st d r . 1988) (citation omitted) (discussing nscsssity for hsaring on.preliminary injunction). This case passss ths AffJidft tsst. Ths Commonwealth had adequate notice
-1,5-
TsT

.RCV 8Y!U S DISTRICT COURT F .8-23-89 ! 9:37AM I

L FT Q3->

809723*270:«17

and an opportunity to prasant evidence and arguments in writing. Tha Conmonvaalth pointa to no diaputad factual mattara that raquirad an oral procaading. Nor doaa it claim that it asked tha court for such a haaring. Thua wa can find no violation of any lagal right. a m commodity Future*
Trading Pfltim'n v. Pr««e*. Inc. . 655 P.2d 779, 782 n.2 (7th
cir. 1981) (duaprocaaa does not require avidantiary haaring whan docuaantary avidanca was aufficiant to aatabliah contampt and defendants failad to damand a haaring or assert any material issue of fact). £ L L Y J & U v. nnitad stat«». 316 r.2d 718, 725 (loth Cir. 1963) (right to hava a planary haaring on criminal contampt ohargaa can ba vaivad).
(Wa add that if tha racant hurricana haa craatad nav, aarioua problama, tha Commonvaalth ia fraa to call thoaa problama to tha attention of tha diatrict court.)
For thaaa reasons tha August 1988 ordar of tha diatrict court ia

Adm. Offlc*; U.S. Courts — BUnehard Pre«, Inc., Boston, M«n. -16-

 
 Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 1 of 513
CASECLOSED,FRC
United States District Court District of Puerto Rico (San Juan) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 3:79−cv−00004−PJB−AKJ

Morales−Feliciano, et al v. Garcia−Padilla, et al Assigned to: Judge Paul J. Barbadoro Referred to: Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone Demand: $0 Case in other court: First Circuit, 04−01300
08−01249 Cause: 42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff

Date Filed: 01/03/1979 Date Terminated: 09/02/2016 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 550 Prisoner: Civil Rights Jurisdiction: Federal Question

Carlos Morales−Feliciano Individually and as representative of the entire class of prisoners in custody of the Correctional Administration of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

represented by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina P.O. Box 22763 UPR Station San Juan, PR 00931−2763 787−620−0527 Fax: 787−620−0039 Email: gramlui@yahoo.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Jose R. Roque−Velazquez Civil Action and Education Corporation Mercantil Plaza Bldg. 2 Ponce de Leon Ave. Suite 720 San Juan, PR 00918−1611 787−753−6999 Fax: 787−764−7666 Email: jrrv@civilactioncorp.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Manuel A. Rodriguez−Banchs Rodriguez Banchs, CSP PO BOX 368006 San Juan, PR 00936−8006 787−764−8896 787−487−0600 Email: manuel@rodriguezbanchs.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Alejandra Ysabel Bird−Lopez Federal Public Defender's Office Patio Gallery Building 241 Franklin D. Roosevelt Ave. Hato Rey, PR 00918−2441 787−281−4922 Fax: 787−281−4899 Email: alejandra_bird@fd.org TERMINATED: 08/31/1999

Arlene R. Perez−Borrero Perez Borrero & Associates Law Office, PSC PO Box 1866 Luquillo, PR 00773 (787)316−1183 Email: arperezbo@hotmail.com TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 2 of 513
Bruce J. McGiverin Mercantil Plaza Building 2 Ponce de Leon Suite 1113 San Juan, PR 00918 787−753−6131 Fax: 787−753−7053 Email: giverin@coqui.net TERMINATED: 01/30/1995
Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez Civil Action and Education Corporation Mercantil Plaza Bldg. 2 Ponce de Leon Ave. Suite 720 San Juan, PR 00918−1611 787−753−6999 Fax: 787−753−6981 Email: garciagtzcv@yahoo.com TERMINATED: 09/25/2012
Carlos E. Ramos−Gonzalez P.O. Box 9023863 San Juan, PR 00936 787−751−1912x2091 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Dennise N. Longo Quinones United States Attorneys Office District of Puerto Rico Torre Chardon Suite 1201 350 Chardon Ave San Juan, PR 00918 787−766−5656 Fax: 787−772−4012 Email: dennise.n.longo@usdoj.gov TERMINATED: 09/29/2000
Harry Anduze−Montano Harry Anduze Montano Law Office 1454 Fernandez Juncos Ave San Juan, PR 00909 787−723−7171 Fax: 787−723−7278 Email: handuze@microjuris.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Harvey B. Nachman Nachman, Guillemard & Rebollo P.O. Box 9949 San Juan, PR 00908 724−1212 TERMINATED: 05/25/1993
Jeffrey M. Williams−English Indiano & Williams, PSC 207 Del Parque Street Third Floor San Juan, PR 00912 787−641−4545 Fax: 787−641−4544 Email: jeffrey.williams@indianowilliams.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999

Plaintiff

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 3 of 513
Jose E. Fernandez−Sein P.O. Box 19855 San Juan, PR 00910 753−1463 Email: jefsprf@yahoo.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Jose R. Olmo−Rodriguez Olmo & Rodriguez Matias El Centro I Suite 215 San Juan, PR 00918 787−758−3570 Fax: 787−764−0338 Email: jrolmo1@gmail.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Nora L. Rodriguez−Matias El Centro I Suite 215 Hato Rey, PR 00918 758−3802 / 758−3570 Fax: 764−0338 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Pia Gallegos 1959 Loiza St. Box 908 Santurce, PR 00914 250−7171 TERMINATED: 06/29/1993
Rafael Perez−Bachs McConnell Valdes, LLC P.O. Box 364225 San Juan, PR 00936−4225 787−250−5658 Fax: 787−250−5185 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Rosa M. Cruz−Niemiec Cruz Niemiec & Vazquez PO Box 195498 San Juan, PR 00919−5498 787−777−0495 Email: rmc@cnvlaw.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Steven Martin 8513 Adirondack Trail Austin, TX 78759 (512)346−7607 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 PRO HAC VICE
Tanaira Padilla−Rodriguez 1225 Ponce de Leon Ave. VIG Tower Suite 1500 San Juan, PR 00907 787−620−0527 787−238−4032 Fax: 787−620−0039 Email: tanairapadilla@yahoo.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 4 of 513

Salvador Borta−Lebron TERMINATED: 01/30/2003
Plaintiff All Plaintiffs

represented by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/25/2012
Manuel A. Rodriguez−Banchs (See above for address) TERMINATED: 03/24/2004
represented by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jose R. Roque−Velazquez Civil Action and Education Corporation 2 Ponce de Leon Ave. Suite 720 San Juan, PR 00918−1611 787−753−6999 Fax: 787−764−7666 Email: jrrv@civilactioncorp.org LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero Manhattan Legal Services 1 West 125th St. Second Floor New York, NY 10027 646−442−3336 646−584−1512 Fax: 646−859−8581 Email: lahenriquez@gmail.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Milagros Rivera−Guadarrama Puerto Rico Office of Court Administration PO Box 190917 San Juan, PR 00919−0917 Fax: 787−766−9184 Email: milagrosr2@tribunales.gobierno.pr LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/25/2012

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 5 of 513

Plaintiff Jesus Ramos−Cedeno
Plaintiff Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez TERMINATED: 09/25/2012 Plaintiff

Fermin Luis Arraiza−Navas American Civil Liberties Union PO Box 40473 San Juan, PR 00940−0473 787−966−3133 Email: arraizanavasfermin@gmail.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Lillian N. Miranda−Rodriguez Miranda & Roque P.O. Box 6525 San Juan, PR 00914−6525 787−726−3960/787−407−2666 Fax: 787−726−3960 Email: li_nmr@yahoo.com TERMINATED: 04/03/2002
Rafael E. Rodriguez−Rivera PO Box 9023951 San Juan, PR 00902 787−528−1417 Email: rerr99@gmail.com TERMINATED: 06/06/2012
Ricardo Alfonso−Garcia Po Box 361669 San Juan, PR 00936−1669 787−467−1369 Fax: 787−701−0922 Email: ralfonsogarcia@gmail.com TERMINATED: 12/03/2001
Steven P. Lausell−Recurt Legal Aid Clinic Interamerican University of Puerto Rico PO Box 194735 San Juan, PR 00919−4735 787−751−1600 Fax: 787−751−1867 Email: slausell@gmail.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Manuel A. Rodriguez−Banchs (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Evelyn Aimee De Jesus−Rodriguez PO BOX 4471 TAMPA, FL 33677 United Sta 787−593−3055 Fax: 8137340232 Email: evelynaimee@me.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/25/2012

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 6 of 513

Roman Miguel Sarriera TERMINATED: 06/06/2012
Plaintiff Mario Jorge−Leon
Plaintiff Felix M. Castro−Santiago
Plaintiff Felix M. Castro−Santiago Plaintiff Juan Carrion−Torres
Plaintiff Ruben Camacho−Muriel
Plaintiff James T. Payne
Plaintiff Rosado Jose Gonzalez Plaintiff Carlos Silva−Galindo

represented by Miguel Sarriera−Roman Miguel Sarriera Roman Law Office 1104 San Miguel St. Quebradillas, PR 00678 787−630−8319 Email: miguelsarriera@yahoo.com TERMINATED: 06/06/2012
represented by Mario Jorge−Leon Institucion Ponce Principal Fase 4 Control M Seccion Roja P.O. Box 7285 Ponce, PR 00731 PRO SE
represented by Felix M. Castro−Santiago Institucion Ponce Principal Fase 4 Control M Seccion Roja P.O. Box 7285 Ponce, PR 00731 PRO SE
represented by Felix M. Castro−Santiago (See above for address) PRO SE
represented by Juan Carrion−Torres I.M.S. B5 5011 Anexo 296 (5−A 209) Box 10005 Guayama, PR 00785 PRO SE
represented by Ruben Camacho−Muriel Institution Ponce Principal P.O. Box 7285 Fase 4 M Roja #226 Ponce, PR 00732 PRO SE
represented by James T. Payne Camp. Zarzal GA−42 HC−04 Box 12502 Rio Grande, PR 00745 PRO SE
represented by Rosado Jose Gonzalez PRO SE
represented by Carlos Silva−Galindo PRO SE

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 7 of 513

Plaintiff Trustee Roberto Roman−Valentin
Plaintiff Arquelio Ruiz−Rodriguez
Plaintiff Santos Nieves−Conde Plaintiff James Perez−Hernandez Plaintiff Samuel Ramos−Gonzalez
Plaintiff Jose Bermudez−Velez
Plaintiff Teodoro Abrahan Jimenez Plaintiff Yassel Diaz−Santana Plaintiff Israel Rodriguez−Colon
Plaintiff

represented by Rafael A. Gonzalez−Valiente Latimer, Biaggi, Rachid & Godreau PO Box 9022512 San Juan, PR 00902−2512 787−726−0077 Email: rgv@g−glawpr.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arquelio Ruiz−Rodriguez Centro de Detencion del Sur Fase 4 M−Azul (212) Box 7285 Ponce, PR 00732 PRO SE
represented by Santos Nieves−Conde PRO SE
represented by James Perez−Hernandez PRO SE
represented by Samuel Ramos−Gonzalez #29005−069 YAZOO CITY MEDIUM FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION P.O. BOX 5888 YAZOO CITY, MS 39194 PRO SE
represented by Jose Bermudez−Velez Anexo 501 Edif.2−E P.O. Box 607073 Bayamon, PR 00960 PRO SE
represented by Teodoro Abrahan Jimenez PRO SE
represented by Yassel Diaz−Santana PRO SE
represented by Israel Rodriguez−Colon Institucion Regional del Sur Fase III Anexo A #12 PO Box 7285 Ponce, PR 00732−7285 PRO SE

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 8 of 513

Norberto Baez−Soto
Plaintiff Ismael E. Figueroa de la Cruz
Plaintiff Victor Rivera−Hernandez
Plaintiff Victor Diaz−Encarnacion
Plaintiff Benjamin Adorno−Garcia
Plaintiff Samuel Reyes−Reyes
Plaintiff Luis R. Hernandez−Rivera

represented by Norberto Baez−Soto PRO SE
represented by Ismael E. Figueroa de la Cruz PRO SE
represented by Victor Rivera−Hernandez PRO SE
represented by Victor Diaz−Encarnacion PRO SE
represented by Benjamin Adorno−Garcia PRO SE
represented by Samuel Reyes−Reyes PRO SE
represented by Luis R. Hernandez−Rivera PRO SE

V. Consol Plaintiff Jose Manuel Delgado−Torres
Consol Plaintiff Sigfredo Zambrana−De−Jesus TERMINATED: 05/02/1994
Consol Plaintiff KSP Surety & Bonding Corporation Civ. 93−1985
Consol Plaintiff

represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Rafael F. Castro−Lang Castro & Castro Law Office PO Box 9023222 San Juan, PR 00902−3222 787−723−3672 787−644−1448 Fax: (787)725−4133 Email: rafacastrolang@gmail.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
represented by

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 9 of 513

Hector Manuel Sanchez−Castro Civ. 92−1284
Consol Plaintiff Raymond Rivera−Rios CV 93−2387(PG) TERMINATED: 12/03/1993 Consol Plaintiff Felix Torres−Garcia
Consol Plaintiff Justo Torres−Garcia
Consol Plaintiff Roberto Gonzalez−Cruz
Consol Plaintiff Hector Ocasio−Ortiz
Consol Plaintiff Jaime Pedrosa−Colon
Consol Plaintiff Samuel Sanchez−Santana Civ. 94−1946
Consol Plaintiff Walter Diaz−Rojas Civ. 94−1946

Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Pedro A. Malavet−Cruz Ave. Fagot Esq. Calle F #66 Ponce, PR 00731 842−0118 TERMINATED: 12/06/1993
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 10 of 513

Consol Plaintiff Carlos Pizarro−Sostre Civ. 94−1946
Consol Plaintiff Rodolfo Cecilio−Figueroa Civ. 94−1946
Consol Plaintiff Ricardo Laureano−Bermudez Civ. 94−1946
Consol Plaintiff Israel Correa−Rivera Civ. 94−1946
Consol Plaintiff Mariano Maldonado−Pagan Civ. 94−1946
Consol Plaintiff Julio Medina−Medina
Consol Plaintiff Efrain Ortiz−Vega TERMINATED: 02/08/1995
Consol Plaintiff Tomas Melendez−Sanchez
Consol Plaintiff Edwin Marcucci−Caraballo TERMINATED: 05/09/1995
Consol Plaintiff Jorge Delgado−Golash

represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 11 of 513

Consol Plaintiff Efrain Ortiz−Vega
Consol Plaintiff Joseph Maya−Gambino TERMINATED: 04/26/1996
Consol Plaintiff Maximiliano Amparo−Concepcion
Consol Plaintiff Jose G. Pena−Sanchez TERMINATED: 06/19/1996
Consol Plaintiff Luis Romero−Rivera consolidated plaintiff from Civil No. 00−1193(PG) Consol Plaintiff Eli Samuel Concepcion−Maestre
Consol Plaintiff Alexis Diaz−Torres
Consol Plaintiff Edwin Vazquez−Rodriguez
Consol Plaintiff Carlos Cruz−Serrano
Consol Plaintiff Luis F. Pacheco−Carmona

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 12 of 513
TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Movant Union General de Trabajadores (UGT)
Movant Correctional Health Services Corporation
Movant Civil Action and Education Corporation
Movant Curnyn Consulting Ltd. 162−21 Powells Cove Boulevard Suite 3R Beechhurst, NY 11357 718−767−5009

represented by Anibal Escanellas−Rivera Escanellas & Juan 204 Domenech Avenue San Juan, PR 00918 787−758−3000 / 758−4167 Fax: 787−250−1111 Email: escanellas@prtc.net TERMINATED: 11/10/2003
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Angel E. Rotger−Sabat Saldana, Carvajal & Velez−Rive, PSC 166 Constitution Ave. San Juan, PR 00901 787−289−9250 Fax: 787−289−9253 Email: arotger@scvrlaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/25/2012
represented by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards Corporate Office Park, Cortec Bldg. 36 Carr. #20, Suite 701 Guaynabo, PR 00966 787−781−5266 Fax: 787−781−5269 Email: kichi.beauchamp@gmail.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 13 of 513

Petitioner Dario Castillo−Robles

V.
Defendant
Luis Fortuno−Burset In his personal capacity and in his representative capacity as Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

represented by Esther Crespin−Credi 150 De Diego Ave. Corner Baldorioty San Juan Health Centre Suite 710 (Grodzinski) Santurce, PR 00907 787−640−6162 Fax: 787−783−5827 Email: juris.ecc@gmail.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni PO Box 51 Ceiba, PR 00735 787−313−2546 Email: dejesusannoni@gmail.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle Department of Justice Federal Buraeu of Prisons GUAYNABO MDC 652 CARRETERA 28 Guaynabo, PR 00965 787−775−7807 Fax: 787−775−7817 Email: jfeldstein@bop.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero Condominio Emajagua Apartamento 2−A Punta Las Maas San Juan, PR 00925 787−727−4563 Email: marcosram1@yahoo.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz Iguina Oharriz Law Office PO Box 366603 San Juan, PR 00936−6603 787−641−5014 Fax: 787−641−5016 Email: iguinalaw@cs.com TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola Landron & Vera LLC

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 14 of 513

Defendant
Lorenzo Villalba In his personal capacity and in his representative capacity as Administrative of the Correctional Administation of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.

1606 Ave. Ponce de Leon Edif. Bogoricin Suite 501 San Juan, PR 00909 787−395−7885 Email: elandron@landronvera.com TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon 804 Ponce de Leon Ave. Suite 302 San Juan, PR 00907 787−250−1420 Fax: 787−763−3286 Email: kenneth.colon@icepr.com TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Mayra Maldonado−Colon Pedro Soto Law Office IBM Plaza 654 Munoz Rivera Ave. Suite 930 San Juan, PR 00918 751−6575 Fax: 751−6480 TERMINATED: 04/07/1994
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 15 of 513

Defendant Jose E. Soler−Zapata In his personal capacity as Secretary of the Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant Dr. Jose A. Nunez−Lopez

represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 16 of 513

Defendant Isabel Suliveres In her personal capacity and in her representative capacity as Secretary of the Dept. of Addiction Services of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
Defendant Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez In his personal capaciy and in his representative capacity as the President of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth Puerto Rico.

TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 17 of 513

Defendant Juanita Gomez In her personal capacity and in her representative capacity as a member of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant Heriberto Acevedo In his personal capacity and in his repressentative capacity as a member of the Parole Board of the

Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 18 of 513

Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant Julio Acevedo−Asencio Individually

Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993 LEAD ATTORNEY
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 LEAD ATTORNEY
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 19 of 513

Defendant Julio Garcia−Garcia Individually
Defendant Julian O. McConnie Individually

Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 LEAD ATTORNEY
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 20 of 513

Defendant Jose L. Cruz−Ramos Individually
Defendant Carlos Romero−Barcelo Individually

ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 21 of 513

Defendant
Irba Cruz de Batista Individually

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Jose A. Fernandez−Paoli Delgado & Fernandez PO Box 11750 Fernandez Juncos Station San Juan, PR 00910−1750 787−274−1414 x240 Fax: 787−764−8241 Email: jfernandez@delgadofernandez.com TERMINATED: 04/09/1996
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Roberto Lefranc−Romero Martinez Alvarez, Menendez Cortada & Lefranc Romero PSC Centro de Seguros Bldg. Suite 407 701 Ponce de Leon Ave. San Juan, PR 00907−3286 787−721−1140 Fax: 787−721−7866 Email: martilaw@prtc.net TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 22 of 513

Defendant Juan Del−Valle−Lopez Individually
Defendant Felix Rodriguez−Pinero Individually

TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 23 of 513

Defendant
Zulma Martinez−de−Cone Individually

LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 24 of 513

Defendant Adm. Correction Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos Individually
Defendant Honorable Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 09/10/1993
Kenneth Colon (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/11/1993
Marcos A. Ramirez−Lavandero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 25 of 513
Charles S. Fax Shapiro Sher & Guinot 36 South Charles St. Twentieth Floor Baltimore, MD 21201−3147 410−385−4285 f1216 Fax: 410−385−1216 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 PRO HAC VICE
Daliah Lugo−Auffant Lugo Auffant Law Offices 8420 Admiral Point Winter park, FL 32792 787−473−7354 Fax: 321−422−0482 Email: perezlugolaw@gmail.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Dennise N. Longo Quinones (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Eduardo R. Estrella Aldarondo & Lopez Bras 588 Hostos Ave. Urb. Baldrich Hato Rey, PR 00918−6241 787−791−5497 Fax: 758−7841 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Elfrick Mendez−Morales Mendez & Mendez Urb. Roosevelt 259 Ing. Ramon Ramos San Juan, PR 00918 787−765−3920 Fax: 787−765−3933 Email: elfrickmendez@yahoo.com TERMINATED: 11/15/1999
Jay A. Garcia−Gregory Fiddler, Gonzalez & Rodriguez PO Box 363507 San Juan, PR 00936−3507 753−3113 Fax: 759−3182 TERMINATED: 10/28/1994
John F. Conrad−Rodriguez Liberty Cablevision of PR Ltd PO Box 140759 Arecibo, PR 00614 787−657−3050 x5033 Fax: 787−262−6348 Email: jconrad@libertypr.com TERMINATED: 05/16/1995
Marshal D. Morgan

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 26 of 513

Defendant Dr. Enrique Vazquez−Quintana

United States Attorneys Office District of Puerto Rico Torre Chardon Suite 1201 350 Chardon Ave San Juan, PR 00918 (787) 766−5656 Fax: (787) 766−6222 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Mercedes Trigo−Ferraiuoli US District Court CCC Chambers Federal Bldg. Room CH−131 150 Chardon St. San Juan, PR 00918 787−772−3114 Fax: 787−766−5737 Email: Mercedes_Trigo@prd.uscourts.gov TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Rick Nemcik−Cruz P.O Box 43001 PMB 309 Rio Grande, PR 00745−6600 (510) 333−7333 Fax: 787−809−2158 Email: notices@nemcik.com TERMINATED: 02/07/2000
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Charles S. Fax (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 PRO HAC VICE

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 27 of 513

Defendant Johnny Colon

Eduardo R. Estrella (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Elfrick Mendez−Morales (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Jay A. Garcia−Gregory (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/28/1994
John F. Conrad−Rodriguez (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/16/1995
Marshal D. Morgan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Mercedes Trigo−Ferraiuoli (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Charles S. Fax (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 PRO HAC VICE
Eduardo R. Estrella (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Elfrick Mendez−Morales (See above for address)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 28 of 513

Defendant
Johnny Rullan Secretary of the Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

TERMINATED: 11/15/1999
Jay A. Garcia−Gregory (See above for address) TERMINATED: 10/28/1994
John F. Conrad−Rodriguez (See above for address) TERMINATED: 05/16/1995
Marshal D. Morgan (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Mercedes Trigo−Ferraiuoli (See above for address) TERMINATED: 08/31/1999
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eduardo A. Vera−Ramirez Landron & Vera LLC 1606 Ave. Ponce de Leon Edif. Bogoricin Suite 501 San Juan, PR 00909 787−395−7886 787−960−2727 Email: evera@landronvera.com TERMINATED: 02/14/2001
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz Del Valle Law PO Box 9022473 San Juan, PR 00902−24743 787 233 0202 Email: cdvlawpr@gmail.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 29 of 513

Defendant Sila M. Calderon as Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant Miguel Pereira Castillo

Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 30 of 513

Defendant Governor Anibal Acevedo Vila Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant Health Secretary Rosa Perez Perdomo TERMINATED: 03/03/2006

Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 31 of 513

Defendant Warden Judith Matias−De−Leon
Defendant Alejandro Garcia−Padilla Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
Defendant Jorge Anibal Torres−Rodriguez

(See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Carlos Rodriguez−Garcia P.O. Box 1629 Caguas, PR 00726−1629 746−0305

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 32 of 513
TERMINATED: 09/30/2015 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos Rafael Rodriguez−Garcia 1111 17th St. Urb. Villa Nevares San Juan, PR 00921 787−219−3052 Fax: 787−763−4141 Email: crgpsc@gmail.com TERMINATED: 09/30/2015 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Consol Defendant Victor Velazquez−Caussade Medical Director, Mayaguez Detention Center
Consol Defendant Miguel A. Nieves−Ruiz
Consol Defendant Angelo Ravelo−Garcia Civ. 93−1985
Consol Defendant Angel Miranda Civ. 93−1985
Consol Defendant Hon. Juan A. Garcia Commissioner of Insurance of Puerto Rico

represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Guillermo A. Macari−Grillo Macari Law Office PO Box 190222 San Juan, PR 00919−0222

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 33 of 513

Consol Defendant Jose L. Jimenez−Quinones Administrator of Corrections (Civ. 92−1284)
Consol Defendant Israel Alers Superintendent of the Maximum security annex to the Rio Piedras State Penitentiary
Consol Defendant Benito Rosario Superintendent Puerto Rico State Penitentiary at Rio Piedras Maximum Security Annex
Consol Defendant Orquidea Villanueva Civ. 93−2387
Consol Defendant Roberto Velez Civ. 93−2387
Consol Defendant Otto Riefkohl

787−403−5897 Fax: 787−791−5242 Email: macarilaw@gmail.com TERMINATED: 04/07/1994
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Hjalmar Flax Commonwealth Department of Justice Federal Litigation Division PO Box 9020192 San Juan, PR 00902−0192 721−8010 TERMINATED: 04/07/1994
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Hjalmar Flax (See above for address) TERMINATED: 04/07/1994
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Hjalmar Flax (See above for address) TERMINATED: 04/07/1994
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Charles S. Fax (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/15/2000 PRO HAC VICE

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 34 of 513

Consol Defendant Hector A. Gabriel
Consol Defendant Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez
Consol Defendant Otto Riefkohl−Gorbea
Consol Defendant Honorable Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez
Consol Defendant Nydia Cotto−Vives
Consol Defendant Administrador Geraldo Cruz−Soto
Consol Defendant Administracion de Correccion y Rehabilitacion

Gloria Rivera−Carrero Department of Justice Commonwealth of Puerto Rico P.O. Box 9020192 San Juan, PR 00902−0192 787−721−7700 TERMINATED: 03/11/1996
PHV Luis Guinot , Jr. 1800 K St. N.W. Suite 716 Washington, DC 20006−5116 202−331−0200 Fax: 202−331−7457 Email: lg@shapirosher.com TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 PRO HAC VICE
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Luis Sanchez−Betances

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 35 of 513

Consol Defendant Joe Colon
Consol Defendant Gerardo Cruz−Soto
Consol Defendant Joseph F. Colon TERMINATED: 04/11/1996
Consol Defendant Luis A. Custodian Officer Feliciano
Consol Defendant Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Sanchez−Betances, Sifre & Munoz−Noya Law Offices, PSC PO Box 364428 San Juan, PR 00936−4428 787−756−7880 Fax: 787−753−6580 Email: lsb@sbsmnlaw.com TERMINATED: 03/03/2006
PHV Barron L. Stroud 1800 K St. Suite 716 Washington, DC 20006−5116 202−331−0200 TERMINATED: 08/31/1999 PRO HAC VICE
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila Office of the Federal Public Defender Del Rio Division 2205 Veterans Blvd. Suite A2 Del Rio, TX 78840−3141 830−703−2040 Fax: 830−703−2047 Email: jzampierollo.distrito@gmail.com TERMINATED: 07/18/2018 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 36 of 513

Consol Defendant Administracion de Correccion y Rehabilitacion
Consol Defendant Zoe Laboy
Consol Defendant Gladys Rivera−Correa

Joel Torres−Ortiz Department of Justice Federal Litigation Division PO Box 9020192 San Juan, PR 00902−0192 787−340−2858 Email: joeltorres@justicia.pr.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Melissa Massheder−Torres Department of Justice of Puerto Rico PO Box 9020192 San Juan, PR 00902−0192 787−721−2900 Fax: 787−723−9188 Email: mmassheder@vclawpr.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Ivan Solares−Nunez Puerto Rico Insurance Commissioner's Office Management Department B5 Tabonuco St., Suite 216, PMB 356 Guaynabo, PR 00968−3029 787−568−3008 787−304−8686 Fax: 787−273−6365 Email: ivan.solares@ocs.pr.gov TERMINATED: 03/23/2017 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 37 of 513

Consol Defendant Evaristo Cruz
Consol Defendant Maria Riscard
Consol Defendant Celia Alamo
Consol Defendant Mirla M. Rodriguez−Marin
Mediator CCA Settlement Conusel

represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Charles A. Cordero 1st Circuit Court of Appeals Settlement Counsel Ochoa Building 5th Floor 500 De la Tanca Street, Suite 514 San Juan, PR 00901−1942 787−977−6133 Fax: 787−977−6185 Email: Honorable_Charles_Cordero@ca1.uscourts.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V.
Interested Party
Prairie Correctional Facility Corporation (PCF) TERMINATED: 04/11/1995

represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Edelmiro Salas−Garcia P.O. Box 1500 Mayaguez, PR 00681−1500 787−832−1323 TERMINATED: 04/11/1995
Luis R. Montanez−Aviles Montanez Y Alicea Condominio El Centro I Oficina 211−214

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 38 of 513

Interested Party Jorge Rondon−Melendez TERMINATED: 09/22/1997 Interested Party Ramon Mellado TERMINATED: 09/30/1998 Interested Party Luis E. Tirado−Barreras TERMINATED: 04/14/2000
Interested Party Ricardo Mercado
Interested Party MGT of America TERMINATED: 07/24/2012
Interested Party

Hato Rey, PR 00918 756−6600 TERMINATED: 01/30/1995
Thomas B. Heffelfinger Bowman & Brooke 150 South 5th St. Suite 2600 Minneapolis, MN 55402 TERMINATED: 04/11/1995 PRO HAC VICE
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Luis E. Tirado−Barreras P.O. Box 9020184 San Juan, PR 00902−0184 721−4400 TERMINATED: 04/14/2000
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by William A. Graffam Jimenez, Graffam & Lausell PO Box 366104 San Juan, PR 00936−6104 787−767−1030 Fax: 787−751−4068 Email: wgraffam@jgl.com TERMINATED: 07/24/2012 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 39 of 513

Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad c/o Padre Pedro Gerona P.O. Box 607061 Bayamon, PR 00960−7061 787−799−6120 Interested Party Correctional Health Department
Interested Party Canteen Correctional Services
Interested Party Luis Munoz−Munoz
Interested Party U.S. Probation Interested Party Comite de Amigos y Familiares de Confinados, Inc. Interested Party Association for the Rights and Rehabilitation of Inmates Population Interested Party Group of Prisoners of the Mental Health Program Interested Party Rosendo J. Rodriguez−Melendez Interested Party

Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Angel E. Rotger−Sabat (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Miguel A. Nazario−Briceno Nazario Briceno Law Office LLC Centro de Seguros Bldg. Suite 401 701 Ponce de Leon Ave. San Juan, PR 00907 787−449−2717 787−729−9444 Fax: 787−723−4661 Email: man@nblawpr.com TERMINATED: 07/22/2004
represented by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 40 of 513

Carlos Henriquez Interested Party Jorge Gonzalez−Vasquez Defendant Zoraida Buxo Secretary of Correction and Rehabilitation
Defendant Dr. Carmen Feliciano Secretary of Department of Health of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 41 of 513

Defendant Dr. Nestor Galarza Administrator of the Administration of Mental Health and Anti−Addiction Services
Defendant Dr. Aixa Mariano Director of Correctional Health Services
Defendant Enrique Garcia−Garcia

represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 42 of 513
ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Arlene R. Perez−Borrero (See above for address) TERMINATED: 07/22/2016 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz (See above for address) TERMINATED: 06/20/2013 ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Eileen Landron−Guardiola (See above for address) TERMINATED: 11/18/2008
Esther Crespin−Credi (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 02/07/1979 02/07/1979 09/05/1980
02/19/1986 03/21/1986 03/21/1986

# Docket Text
7 COMPLAINT in forma pauperis fld. (el) (Entered: 07/16/1992)
The following entries are an extract of the entries of the original docket sheet. For further entries please refer to the original docket. (el) (Entered: 07/16/1992)
373 ORDER ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) that all calabozos' or dungeons, or isolation cells in each of the closed institutions operated by the Adm. of Corrections be closed. Further that all persons mentally unfit and presently confined in the unit known as Lower Maximum 1, at Bayamon Reg. Inst. be forthwith transferred to psychiatric hospitals; further that by no later than 9/22/80 defts shall notify the Crt that a full time medical director has been app. for not less than 1 yr.; that within 1 wk from his app. he shall establish procedures for the medical screening of each incoming p.t. detainee or prisoner which shall include a complete physical exam., etc.; that within 60 days the Adm. of Corr. shall provide inmates w. soap, towels, toothpaste, etc.; that examinations shall be provided to food handlers hereafter so that no food handler shall be more than 6 months on job duty w/o an exam., etc.; that Adm. of Corr. shall repair immediately the plumbing system and shall file a report w/Crt. concerning said repairs; that steps by Adm. of Corr. to insure 35 sq. ft per inmate as temporary measure only within 6 months; that plan shall be submitted within 90 days showing steps the Adm. of Corr. is taking to provide no less than 70 sq. ft per individually celled inmate and 55 sq.ft for inmates housed in dormitories, etc.; that injunciton ordered herein is considered to be a claim separate and apart from other claims including those for costs and atty's fees, etc. (el) (Entered: 07/16/1992)
863 AMENDED COMPLAINT by Carlos Morales−Feliciano amending [7−1] complaint (el) (Entered: 07/16/1992)
868 MEMORANDUM OPINION ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) Findings that the fifth, eighth and fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the U.S. have been and continue to be violated by the defts. (el) (Entered: 07/16/1992)
869 ORDER OF REFERENCE ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) Court appointing Vicent M. Nathan and Frederick Byers as Court Monitors and directing them to file a current assessment of the state of defts' compliance with its 9/5/80 order, to report on conditions disclosed by evidence, and to prepare a proposed detailed remedial order calculate to bring about constitutional conditions throughout the correctional system. Defendants are directed to deposit the sum of $150,000.00

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 43 of 513

09/10/1986 09/29/1986 07/23/1987 05/02/1988
08/15/1988
10/24/1989
01/12/1990 07/20/1990 10/04/1990 01/10/1991

w/the Clerk as interim pymts of costs, etc. (el) (Entered: 07/16/1992)

910 STIPULATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All: re compl/w Crt's order of 9/5/80 as to sleeping and living space required for each inmate and req. to w/d pltfs' motion seeking contempt penalties against defts. (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/17/1992)

916 ORDER granting [910−1] stipulation provisionally and directing the defts to proceed to implement the terms of said stipulation, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

1029

ORDER Due to non−compliance w/Orders of this Crrt, the Governor, the Administrator of Correction and the members of the Parole Board shall pay as Sanctions the amt of $50,000.00 for violation to Crt's orders. Also a daily fine of $10.00 per inmate shall be paid whenever an inmate is held living in an institution where the maximum capacity has been exceeded. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

1233

ORDER: Within 30 days an Expedited Bail Project shall be implemented. The criteria established by defts shall be fld within 15 days. The Crt Monitors shall nominate an individual to serve as Executive Director of the EBP and shall recommend a level of compensation for that individual. The Administration of Correction shall develop and file criteria for making recommendation of executive clemency to the Governor, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

1343

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER, Directing defts to pay as Sanctions a daily fine of $50.00 per inmate for any prisoner hld at any institution in violation of the maximum capacity of the housing unit to which he is assigned. Should defts fail to achieve compliance by 9/1/88 the fine shall increase to $60.00 per inmate and shall continue to increase by $10.00 per inmate on the first day of each succeeding month until compliance is achieved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

1912

ORDER: Directing the Crt Monitor to nominate no more than 7 members of the PR community to serve as members of a consulting committee, to be known as the Morales Feliciano Special Advisory Committee, etc., and to commence function pursuant to terms of this Order, etc. Further that the Committee shall remain in existence until further order of the Crt, etc. The Committee is to consider and evaluate projects and programs and assist the Crt in making its determination of expenditures to be made from the fine fund, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

2016

ORDER: Appointing Dr. Eliezer Curet Cuevas, Enrique Irizarry, Jr., Enrique Marti Coll, Juan Agosto Alicea and Norman Maldonado, M.D. to serve as members of the Morales Feliciano Advisory Committee. It is further ordered that the committee shall assume all responsibilities delegated to it in the Crt's Order of 10/24/89. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/17/1992)

2322 MOTION SUBMITTING COMPREHENSIVE PLAN w/attachment of said plan, by Defendants−All (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

2429 MOTION by Defendant−All to Amend [910−1] stipulation re the 55 sq. ft standard due to emergency temporary housing project, by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/17/1992)

2586

ORDER denying [2429−1] motion to Amend [910−1] stipulation re the 55 sq. ft standard due to emergency temporary housing project, by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano. defts to be in continuing civil contempt for non−compliance of the 55 sq ft of living space per inmate; and imposing a daily fine/Sanctions of $10.00 per prisoner in an institution where the maximum capacity has exceeded and that said fine shall increase by the sum of $5.00 per month per prisoner on the first day of each succeeding month until defts have achieved compl/w Crt's Order of 1/26/87; that all fines paid pursuant to this order shall be deposited in the registry for the receipt of fine purs/Crt's order of 7/23/87, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/17/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 44 of 513

01/22/1991 02/25/1991 05/30/1991
08/06/1991
08/27/1991 08/27/1991 09/11/1991
10/10/1991
10/17/1991 11/21/1991 12/11/1991 12/27/1991

2607 MOTION SUBMITTING Second Comprehensive Semi Anuual Report on compliance progress with requiremnts of the medical care plan and mental health plan by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

2690 ORDER, Establishing a Special Fund for Disbursement of Funds for pymt of pltfs' atty fees and expenses on a regular basis as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

2922

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Finding deft to be in civil contempt of this Crt's order of 3−30−90 requiring the preparation and filing of evaluations of electrical, plumbing and major structural deficiencies in all faciliities of the Adm. of Corrections, as well as of plan for corrective actions in accordance with Sec. 17, 18 and 19 of the environmental plan. Deft shall enter into and file a contract with BRCA to complete the required evaluations and to prepare the necessary corrective action plans. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3107

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER: Defts are adjudged to be in civil contempt for their failure to file in evidence of the availability of adequate funding for the construction or renovation of a forensic facility as required by the Mental Health Plan. However NO SANCTIONS will be imposed. Deft are to file final construction plans for the new forensic hospital and a revised and final staffing plan, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3145 Report re: Progress Report by Special Advisory Committee. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3149 158th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: assessment of defts' revised classificaiton manual. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3174

ORDER, for the Collection of Registry Fund fee and directing the Clerk to Disburse the amt of $338,527.39 in pymt of the Registry Fee. This covers the amt of the fee from its inception on 6−12−89 to 7−31−91. From here on and in accordance with the statute the Registry fee will be imposed, calculated and paid w/o need of further order from Crt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3237

ORDER Apprvg Crt Monitors' application of additional medical expert and for use of fine monies to compensate all expert consultants; directing the Clerk to transfer the sum of $250,000.00 from the special fund to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation to permit pymt of all fees and expenses incurred by the Crt Monitor in connection with expert consultants employed by that Office, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3253

ORDER Directing the Clerk to contract the services of Vila del Corral to provide on−going support in the accounting management of this case. Vila del Corral shall be reimbursed the fee of $500.00 per wk for these services from the special fund created as result of the fines imposed and collected in Civil 79−4(PG). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3334 Report re: PROGRESS REPORT, by Special Advisory Committee. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3379 Recommendation Report by the Special Advisory Committeer and Crt Monitor Vincent M. Nathan re: for funding of a program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the Auspices of Hogares Crea, Inc. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3403

ORDER granting and confirming the [3149−1] 158th report re assessment of defts' revised classification manual; directing defts to file within 90 days of entry of this order 1) a revision of the revised Classificaiton Manuel pertaining to sentenced inmates; 2) a plan establishing institutional security designations for all currently exisitng and projected AOC penal institutions; 3) a plan for the utilization of all currently existing and projected bed space corresponding to the custody profile of the AOC's penal population and defts shall file a proposed implementation schedule for their pilot pretrial intake screening project and a proposed time frame for the development and filing of a pretrial classification manual. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/17/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 45 of 513

01/02/1992 01/05/1992 01/10/1992 01/13/1992
01/21/1992 02/05/1992 02/21/1992 03/20/1992
03/27/1992 04/14/1992 04/14/1992 04/28/1992 05/05/1992
05/14/1992 05/15/1992

3413 STIPULATION regarding population management and pilot project at Ponce jail by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All . (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER [4161−1] submission of accounting of expenditures of fine monies for Nov 1992. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)

3436 ORDER temporarily granting [3413−1] stipulation re population management and a pilot project at Ponce, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3438

ORDER Apprvg and granting [3379−1] recommendation report of the Special Advisory Committee and the Crt Monitor seeking the expenditure of $217,106.00 from fine monies hld in special fund and that these funds shall be expended by Hogar Crea in a manner consistent with the proposal set forth in Exh. B to the recommendation of the Special Advisory Committee and the Crt Monitor. Further ordered that upon recpt and apprvl of each monthly report the acctg of expenditures by Hogar Crea the Crt will enter an appropriate order for pymt of expenditures during the preceding month. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/23/1992)

3453 FOURTH AMENDED COMPLAINT by Carlos Morales−Feliciano amending [7−1] complaint (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

MANAGER CK.#407660 DTD /5/93 in the amt of $16,241.41 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

3521 MOTION SUBMITTING Fourth Semiannual Comprehensive Report by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3575

**VACATED SEE 9971 ORDER**ORDER Approving and granting [3413−1] stipulation re population management and a pilot project at Ponce. All defts are enjoined to proceed forthwith to implement the terms of the stipulation according to the timetables set forth therein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 8/18/2011 (cm). (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3587 Report re: First report of the program for the rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea pursuant to Crt's Order of 1/13/92, by Director of Alicea Alvarado of Program for Rehabilitation of Drug Users. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3633 Report re: Second Report of the Program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea by Director of Program Elliot Alicea Alvarado ad Juan Jose Garcia Rio, President of Hogar Crea. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3631 MOTION SUBMITTING revised classification manual by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3648 MOTION by Defendant−All counsel submitting time record for Attorney Fees for the period of 7−1−91 to 12−31−91. (Sealed time records attached) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3670

ORDER, to Amend [869−1] order in which the Crt Monitor is apptd and his functions are outlined. This order is amended to the extent that the Crt Monitor shall serve as mediators among the parties. To this end, the Crt Monitors shall continue to deal informally with the parties and with counsel as issues arise that require discussion and resolution. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3682 Third Report re: of the Program for the Rehabilitation of drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea, by Director of the Program Elliot Alicea Alvarado and Juan Jose Garcia, President of Hogar Cea. (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3686

ORDER granting [3631−1] defts' Inmate Classification Manual and directing defts to file with the Crt no later than 60 days upon EOD a staff training curriculum identifying by position all staff members charged with responsibilities related to inmate classification and defts shall file a Spanish translation of their Revised Classification Manual for sentenced inmates within 60 days. (EOD 5/27/92)( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 46 of 513

06/04/1992 06/08/1992 06/24/1992 06/24/1992 06/26/1992 06/29/1992
06/29/1992 06/30/1992 07/02/1992 07/02/1992 07/06/1992 07/06/1992 07/06/1992 07/06/1992 07/06/1992 07/06/1992

3716 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Correct water problems at Rio Piedras complex. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3720 NOTICE of by Carlos Morales−Feliciano thru Atty Garcia Gutierrez of pltfs' class of intention to litigate matters concerning the Rio Piedras Prison Complex. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3749 203rd Report by Vincent M. Nathan Crt Monitor re: overcrowding. (Exhb D attchd) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3750 204th Report by Vincent M. Nathan Crt Monitor re: overcrowding. (Exhb D attchd) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3755 ORDER Confirming and granting [3749−1] report and the pymt of $5,913,950.00 is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3758

ORDER: Authorizing and accepting the Special Master's final report and that vacating Crt's order of 6/12/91 announcing of its intention to appoint a special master and its order of 7/17/91 apptg Jorge A. Pierluisi Diaz to serve as special master are vacated and the Special Master is relieved of all further responsibility. Directing the Special Master and his legal counsel to submit for the Crt's review and apprvl final stmts of fees and expenses incurred during the performance of their duties within 30 days; deft shall enter into and file a contract with BRCA or with RJAG within 10 days of entry of this order for the purpose of accomplishing the objectives of sections 17, 18 and 19 of the Environmental Plan apprvd by the Crt on 3−30−90; further ordered that upon joint application by the parties, not more than $3,428,000. in fine monies shall be transferred as they become necessary to defray a portion of the expenses incurred by defts in connection with their contract. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3762 JOINT MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All on population caps pursuant to para. #5 of the parties' stipulation of 12−30−91. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3765 189th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: defts' state of compliance with ACA constructions standards in the new dormitory at Camp La Pica. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3769 199th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: defts' repair of water treatment plants at Camp Punta Lima and Camp La Pica. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3770 200th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: defts' progress toward compliance with their environmental plan as assessed by the Crt's consultants in Jan/92. (el) (Entered: 07/17/1992)

3776 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,025.52 for the month of June/92 for Atty Carlos Ramos Gonzalez. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3777 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,271.36 and expenses in the amt of $31.87 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3778 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $10,824.32 and expenses in the amt of $770.34 for the month of May 1992; the amt of $9,728.16 for atty fee and $816.27 for expenses for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3779 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $661.50 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3781 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $12,250.46 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Pia Gallegos (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3782 APPLICATION/NOTICE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses for the month of June, 1992 for Attys Nachman and Fernandez Sein. (el)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 47 of 513

07/06/1992 07/06/1992
07/07/1992 07/07/1992 07/09/1992 07/10/1992 07/10/1992 07/10/1992 07/10/1992 07/10/1992 07/13/1992 07/14/1992 07/14/1992
07/14/1992 07/15/1992 07/15/1992 07/15/1992 07/15/1992

(Entered: 07/20/1992)

3783 STIPULATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All on the continued employment of Kennet Faiver. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3784

ORDER granting [3783−1] stipulation in all respects. Further ordered that Lambert King, M.D. shall serve as a friend of the court to perform the tasks assigned to him by the parties stipulation. Dr. King shall submit to the Crt through the Crt Monitor a stmt of his usual and ordinary fees for service. Further ordered that the appl for apprvl of severance pay for Kenneth Faive is denied as moot. (Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3787 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan recommending compensation in the amt of $125.00 per hr. for services performed by Lambert King, M.D. Response due 7/20/92 . (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3788 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $1,782.50 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3791 ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 for pymt of services to Vila del Corral & Co. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3792 Amended Application/MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Amend [3781−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $12,250.46 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Pia Gallegos by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3793 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses for the period of 6/1/92 through 6/30/92. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3797 Amendment to 203rd and 204th Report by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3798 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for increase in compensation for Administrative Assistants Melissa Hayes, Anthony Petropulous and Reinaldo Roman. . Response due 7/23/92 . (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3799 Fifth Report re: the PROGRAM FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DRUG USERS under the auspices of Hogar Crea, by Director Elliot Alicea Alvarado and President Juan J. Garcia Rios. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3800 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Withdraw mot. dkt. 3756 re motion to hold deft Soler Zapata in contempt. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3801 205th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3802 MOTION in compl/w Crt order of 5−15−92 re Classification Manual and SUBMITTING Spanish translation of said document together with training curriculum of staff charged with responsibilities related to inmate classification by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3803 201st Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: Report conveying consultant's reviews of defts' Mental Health Policy and procedure manuals fld purs to sections 29 and 30 of the Mental Health Plan (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3804 Fortieth Report re: operational expenses, releases and accts, by Director Johnny Colon. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3805 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [3765−1] report on defts state of compl/w ACA construction standards in the new dormitory at camp La Pica fld by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3806 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: modification of administrative organization for the delivery of pltf class medical and mental health care. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

3807 Informative Motion by Director Johnny Colon re: EBP's June 1992 expenses. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 48 of 513

07/15/1992 07/15/1992 07/15/1992 07/16/1992
07/16/1992 07/16/1992 07/17/1992
07/17/1992
07/17/1992
07/20/1992 07/20/1992 07/21/1992 07/21/1992 07/21/1992 07/22/1992 07/22/1992 07/23/1992 07/24/1992 07/24/1992

3808 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [3797−1] amendment to 203rd and 204th reports by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
3809 ORDER apprvg and granting [3762−1] joint motion on population caps pursuant to para. #5 of the parties' stipulation of 12−30−91. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [3787−1] motion recommending compensation in the amt of $125.00 per hr. for services performed by Lambert King, M.D. as a friend of the crt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
3810 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to motion re State Penitentiary complex [3720−1] notice to litigate by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [3716−1] motion to Correct water problems at Rio Piedras complex. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
3811 MOTION SUBMITTING contract in compl/w 12/30/92 stipulation by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
3812 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time in which to file the Fifth Semiannual Comprehensie Report. (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
3813 MOTION SUBMITTING Fifth Semiannual Comprehensive Report by Defendant−All (Voluminous reports on the description of progress toward compl/w the Medical Care Plan and the Mental Health Plan at all the institution of the Administration of Correction.) (el) Modified on 07/23/1992 (Entered: 07/20/1992)
3813 MOTION SUBMITTING Fifth SemiAnnual Comprehensive Report by Defendant−All (Voluminous reports containing the description of progress toward compl/w the Medical Care Plan and the Mental Health Plan) (el) (Entered: 07/20/1992)
3814 ORDER Confirming and granting [3801−1] 205th report and the pymt of $5,243,500.00 is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/23/1992)
3815 FOURTH APPLICATION for an increase of the EBP's acct and req. that the Clerk be ordered to Disburse Funds in the amt of $500,000.00. (el) Modified on 07/28/1992 (Entered: 07/23/1992)
3816 207th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 07/23/1992)
3817 Amended First Accounting Report by Defendant−All re: expenditures for the expansion of the DSCA Program at Guerrero. (el) (Entered: 07/23/1992)
3818 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum and for a group of recommended inmates be produced for the 7−27−92 hrg. (el) (Entered: 07/23/1992)
Return of Letter−Receipt by Jorge Aa. Pierluisi Diaz of ck no. 379635 in the amt of $3,079.25 for services rendered throughout Jan. to March 31, 1992. (el) (Entered: 07/28/1992)
3819 MOTION SUBMITTING Correction's Rehabilitation Program Services Agreement and in compl/w Crt order of 6−29−92 dkt. #3758, by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 07/23/1992)
3820 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time in which to file opposition to pltfs' mot. req. hrg on the 159th Report re policy and procedure manuals. (el) (Entered: 07/23/1992)
3821 206th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding (el) (Entered: 07/28/1992)
3822 ORDER granting [3818−1] motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum and for a group of recommended inmates be produced for the 7−27−92 hrg. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/28/1992)
WRIT of habeas corpus ad testificandum issued to Administrator of Corrections. (el) (Entered: 07/28/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 49 of 513

07/24/1992 07/24/1992 07/24/1992 07/24/1992 07/24/1992 07/24/1992 07/27/1992
07/27/1992 07/27/1992
07/27/1992
07/27/1992
07/27/1992 07/27/1992 07/27/1992 07/28/1992 07/28/1992 07/28/1992

3823 MOTION SUBMITTING checks in the amt of $29,536.22 and $34,544.18 for expenditures incurred by the EBP as operations and costs for the month of April and May, 1992, by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 07/28/1992)
3824 APPLICATION by Defendant−All for Disbursement/transfer of Funds payable to the Treasury Dept (ELA) in the sum of $474,349.00 for the expansion of the DSCA program at Guerrero. (el) (Entered: 07/28/1992)
3825 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time in which to file English translation of exh B attchd to dkt. 3824. (el) (Entered: 07/28/1992)
3826 ORDER Directing the Clerk to invest the sum of $996,121.22 in U.S. Treasury Notes with a maturity date of 7/15/99 with Shearson Lehman Brothers, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3827 ORDER Directing the Clerk to invest ths sum of $999,658.32 in U.S. Treasury Notes with a maturity date of 7/15/99 with Pain Webber, as stated herein, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3828 ORDER Directing the Clerk to invest the sum of $999,893.31 in U.S. Treasury Notes with a maturity date of 7/15/99 with Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. as stated herein, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3829 Minute entry: ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) Hrg called on pltfs' req. for relief at the State Penitentiary. Defts submit a remedial plan and req.time for their experts to go into the penitentiary as a management team and assess the situation. Testimony by pltf hrd. Hreg cont'd to 7/28/92 at 9:00 a.m. (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3830 ORDER Directing the Clerk to advance to Atty Nachman the sum of $5,630.00 for Attorney Fees for the month of March, April and May, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3831 ORDER Directing the Clerk to advance and issue a check for Attorney Fees in the amt of $9,741.37 to Atty Harry Anduze Montano for the months of March, April, May and June, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3832 ORDER Directing the Clerk to advance and issue a check in the amt of $22,139.09 for Attorney Fees to Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez for the months of May and June, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 07/31/1992 (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3833 ORDER Directing the Clerk to advance and issue a check in the ssum of $12,020.52 for Attorney Fees to Atty Carlos Ramos Gonzalez for the months of March, April, May and June. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3834 ORDER Directing the Clerk to advance and issue a check for the sum of $2,793.75 for Attorney Fees to Atty Nora Rodriguez Matias for the months of March, April and May, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3835 ORDER Directing the Clerk to advance and issue a check for the sum of $3,513.75 to Atty Jeffrey Williams for Attorney Fees for the months of March, April and May, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
3836 ORDER Directing the Clerk to advance and issue a check for the sum of $5,325.08 to Atty Jose Fernandez Sein for Attorney Fees for the months of March, April and May, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
Banco Central Manager's check #380119 payable to Dean Witter Reynolds in the sum of $999,893.31, dtd 7/28/92.(For invsmt in Treasury Notes) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
Banco Central Manager's check #380122 payable to Shearson Lehman Brothers in the amt of $996,121.22 dtd 7/28/92. (For invstmt in Treasury notes.) (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)
Banco Central Manager's check #380120 payable to Paine Webber in the amt of $999,658.32 dtd 7/28/92. (For investment in Treasury Notess) (el) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 50 of 513

07/28/1992
07/28/1992 07/28/1992 07/28/1992 07/29/1992 07/29/1992
07/29/1992 07/29/1992 07/29/1992 07/30/1992 07/30/1992 07/31/1992

07/31/1992)

3837

Minute entry: ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) Second day of the hrg on req. for relief at that State Penitentiary called. Further testimonies hrd by pltfs. Deft req. that testimonies of Dr. Soriano, Dr. Estrada and Dr. Garcia be stricken from the record because pltf's counsel violated the modern rules of professional conduct. After parties discussed this issue the Crt denies the motion and states that a written ruling will be issued. Hrg cont'd to 7/29/92. (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)

3838 209th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)

3839 202nd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: HIV/AIDS Focused Study (el) (Entered: 07/31/1992)

3840 NOTICE of by Carlos Morales−Feliciano thru Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez that throughout 7−28−92 thru 8−3−92 Atty Harvey Nachman will be lead counsel. (el) (Entered: 08/03/1992)

3841

Minute entry: ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) Third day of hrg re req. for relief at the State Penitentiary called. Further testimonies hrd by pltfs. Pltfs make an offer of proof as to the testimonies of 2 remaining inmates. Exh. 3 the video taken at the State Penitentiary and exh. 22 the testimony of Steve Martin are shown. Hrg cont'd to 7−30−92. (el) (Entered: 08/03/1992)

3842

RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [3788−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $1,782.50 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [3782−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses for the month of June, 1992 for Attys Nachman and Fernandez Sein. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [3781−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $12,250.46 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Pia Gallegos by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [3779−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $661.50 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [3778−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $10,824.32 and expenses in the amt of $770.34 for the month of May 1992; the amt of $9,728.16 for atty fee and $816.27 for expenses for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [3777−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,271.36 and expenses in the amt of $31.87 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [3776−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,025.52 for the month of June/92 for Atty Carlos Ramos Gonzalez. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 08/03/1992)

3843 ORDER Confirming and granting [3816−1] 207th report and the pymt of $5,300,200.00 is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population managment and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/03/1992)

3844 ORDER granting and adopting the [3765−1] 189th report. The Crt will also order defts to implement the recommendation of Dr.Walker, the crt's expert, that defts keep fire hoses in the fire hose cabinets in the housing units in all AOC institutions ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/03/1992)

3845 ORDER granting [3799−1] report, and directing the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $20,875.20 for Disbursement of Funds to Hogar Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/03/1992)

3846 Minute entry: ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) Fourth day of hrg on req. for relief at the State Penitentiary called. Testimonies by defts hrd. Hrg is cont'd to 8/13/92 at 9:00 a.m. (Pltfs exhs 28 and 29 admit. Defts exhs B through E admitted.) (el) (Entered: 08/03/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [3815−1] motion for an increase of the EBP's acct and req. that the Clerk be ordered to Disburse Funds in the amt of $500,000.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

3847 ORDER the Clerk is to pay invoice No. 8960 in the amt of $1,375 to Vila de Corral & Co. for the services provided for the month of June 1992 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 51 of 513

07/31/1992 07/31/1992 07/31/1992 07/31/1992
08/03/1992 08/03/1992 08/04/1992
08/04/1992 08/04/1992 08/04/1992 08/05/1992 08/05/1992
08/05/1992 08/05/1992 08/05/1992 08/05/1992

3848 ORDER the Clerk is to pay invoice No. 8959 in the amt of $1,625 to Vila de Corral & Co for the services provided for the month of May 1992 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

3849 MOTION by Isabel Suliveres, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Lorenzo Villalba, Rafael Hernandez−Colon for compliance w/order of 3/30/90 re: quarterly evaluation of the Dept of Health (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

3850 MOTION by Isabel Suliveres, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Lorenzo Villalba, Rafael Hernandez−Colon to Extend Time for 30 days to file English transl of documents attached to mot #3849 (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

3851

ORDER confirming and granting [3821−1] report. That the payment of $5,338,700 pursuant to the Crt's order of 7−23−87 and 1−10−91, as a sanction for continuing contempt of this crt's orders in re crowding is SUSPENDED pursuant to the provisions of sec 7 of the parties' 12−30−91 stipulation re population management and a pilot project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

3852 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation by Isabel Suliveres, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Lorenzo Villalba, Rafael Hernandez−Colon (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

3853 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees of atty Pia Gallegos for the month of July 1992 in the amt of $18,825.63 and office expenses in the amt of $260.27 for a total of $19,085.90. (np) (Entered: 08/05/1992)

3854

MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly report on expenditures for the months of April thru June, 1992 and in accordance with Section 1.3 of the Environmental Health and Maintenance Plan by Defendant−All. (Plan de Saneamiento, Mantenimiento y Control de Incendios Informe Trimestral de Asignaciones y Desembolso de Fondos Abril a Junio, 1992 submitted) (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3855 Amended Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates' admissions and releases for the month of June, 1992. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3856 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $648.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Nora Rodriguez Matias. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3857 210th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3858 ORDER granting [3770−1] 200th report and adopting said report and findings of fact contained in it as its own. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3859

ORDER granting [3769−1] 199th report and adopting the findings of fact contained in it as its own. Deft are also directed to implement the recommendation of Dr. Walker, the court's consultant, that defts "should monitor the contractors performance strictly to insure full compliance with all provisions of the contract. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3860 ORDER vacating [3845−2] relief, and directing the Clerk to issue a check for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $48,464.07 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3861 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,263.52 and expenses in the sum of $24.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3862 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expense charges for the month of July, 1992 for Attys Harvey B. Nachman and Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

3863 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $7,462.50 plus expenses in the amt of $357.50 for a total of $7,820.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 52 of 513

08/05/1992 08/06/1992 08/06/1992 08/06/1992 08/06/1992 08/06/1992 08/06/1992 08/07/1992 08/07/1992 08/07/1992 08/07/1992 08/10/1992
08/10/1992 08/10/1992 08/10/1992 08/10/1992 08/11/1992 08/11/1992
08/11/1992

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #379634, dtd 7−7−92 payable to Dominguez & Totti, Esq in the amt of $390.00. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
3864 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $17,449.12 and expenses in the amt of $298.04 for the month of July 1992 for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
3865 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $5,070.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CHECK #380529, dtd 8/6/92 in the amt of $9,741.37 payable to Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CHECK #380526 dtd 8/6/92 in the amt of $500,000.00 payable to Expedited Bail Project. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CHECK #380527 dtd 8//6/92 in the amt of $22,139.09 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CHECK #380528 dtd 8/6/92 in the amt of $3,513.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CHECK #380580 dtd 8/7/92 in the amt of $48,464.07 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. (thru Elliot Alicea) (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
3866 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to respond to defts' Motion enclosing contract pursuant to para. #2 of 12/30/91 stipulation. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
3867 MOTION SUBMITTING Dr. King's report on modification and timetables re the medical plan and req. that defts comply with the timetables set by Dr. King by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
3868 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses for the month of July, 1992. (el) (Entered: 08/10/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS ck #380530 dtd 8/6/92 in the amt of $3,000.00 payable to Vila de Corral & Co. for services rendered on 5/19/92 $1,625.00 and services rendered on 6/19/92 for $1,375.00 for a total of $3,000.00. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S ck #380581 dtd 8/7/92 in the amt of $12,020.52 payable to Carlos Ramos Gonzalez for atty fees. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)
3869 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for payment of fees of mental health expert of Dr. Cynthia Casanova in the amt of $13,875.00 from fine Fund (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)
3870 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of AOC's quarterly evaluation on environmental conditions by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S ck 380583 dtd 8/7/92 in the amt of $5,325.08 payable to Jose Fernandez Sein for atty fees. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)
3871 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Show Cause why pltf in Cr. No 92−25(GG) and deft herein and several of their agents should not be hld in contempt (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)
3872 ORDER granting [3871−1] motion to Show Cause why pltf in Cr. No 92−25(GG) and deft herein and several of their agents should not be hld in contempt, and setting Show Cause Hearing for 9:00 8/13/92 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)
3873 MOTION by Defendant−All for Attorney Fees for the period covering April 1, 1992 until June 30, 1992. (Time sheets submitted under separate sealed envelope.) (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 53 of 513

08/11/1992 08/11/1992 08/12/1992 08/12/1992 08/12/1992 08/13/1992 08/13/1992
08/13/1992
08/13/1992 08/13/1992
08/14/1992 08/14/1992
08/14/1992
08/17/1992 08/18/1992 08/18/1992
08/18/1992
08/18/1992 08/18/1992 08/18/1992 08/18/1992

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CK #380582 dtd 8/7/92 in the amt of $5,630.00 payable to Harvey Nachman for atty fees. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)

3874 51st Report by Defendant−All re: inmate population of admissions and releases for the month of July/1992. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)

3875 211th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding w/Exh D. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)

3876 212th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding w/exh. D attchd. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)

Acknowledgment of receipt of ck #379634 in the amt of $390. for services rendered in April, 1992 Dominguez & Totti. (el) (Entered: 08/13/1992)

Acknowledgment of rcpt of ck no. 380530 from Banco Central in the amt of $3,000.00 for services rendered by Vila del Corral & Co. (el) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

3877 TRANSCRIPT filed for dates of 7/27/92 re hrg on pltf's req. matter concerning the Rio Piedras Prison Complex taken before Judge Perez Gimenez. (el) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

3878 MOTION SUBMITTING itemized list of expenses for the period of October 1988 thru June 1989 with attchmt by Director of EBP Johnny Colon. (el) (Entered: 08/14/1992)

Text not available. (Entered: 08/18/1992)

3879 Minute entry: Parties met in chambers in re deft Desmond Jadusing Cr. 92−25 (GG) pork diet. Arguments hrd. Petition is dism and the issue is referred to Cr. 92−25. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/18/1992)

3880 MOTION by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/18/1992)

3881 MOTION for a temporary and partial leave for lead counsel and to designate H. Nachman as substitute lead counsel, by atty C. Garcia Gutierrez. (np) (Entered: 08/18/1992)

3882 Sixth Report re: the PROGRAM FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DRUG USERS under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. pursuant to Crt's order of 1/13/92 (np) (Entered: 08/18/1992)

3883 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [3867−1] miscellaneous by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 08/18/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CHECK 380584 dtd 8/7/92 in the amt of $2,793.75 payable to Nora Rodriguez Matias (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3884 208th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: report on defts' progress toward compliance with their environmental plan as assessed by the Crt's consultants in May 1992 w/exhs A−F. (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3885 SUBSTITUTED 212TH Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 148th report pursuant to the Crt's order of 7/23/87 (OVERCROWDING ) w/exhs A−D. (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3886 TRANSCRIPT of second day of hrg on req for relief at the State Penitentiary hld on 7−28−92 at 9am bef Judge Perez. (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3887 TRANSCRIPT of further hrg re: req for relief at the State Penitentiary hld on 7/30/92 bef Judge Perez. (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3888 MOTION SUBMITTING organization chart of DOH's correctional health program by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3889

ORDER defts' 6−9−92 mot enclosing timetable in compliance w/5−18−92 Crt order is in compliance w/that order except to the extent indicated in this action. Plffs' mot re defts' failure to inform the crt of the date by which defts will staff the p/t intake center is gtd. In all other respects plffs' mot is denied. The Crt monitor shall after 8/15/92, file a report on the current status of the p/t intake center and the extent of

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 54 of 513

08/18/1992 08/18/1992
08/18/1992 08/18/1992 08/18/1992 08/18/1992 08/18/1992
08/18/1992
08/18/1992 08/19/1992 08/19/1992 08/19/1992 08/19/1992
08/19/1992

defts' compliance w/this timetable( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3890 ORDER adopting the findings of fact [3839−1] report ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3891

ORDER in re: itemized stmt of time and expenses in the amt of $127,095.32, expenditures from period Jun 1, 1991 thru Jun 30, 1992. The stmts were found reasonable and proper. No objection being fld by any party w/n 10 days of the date of this order, the stmt of fees an expenses is approved.(signed by Judge Juan M. Perez Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3892 ORDER adoptin the findings [3803−1] report ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3893 ORDER adopting findings of 191st report of monitor re: report conveying consultants' report on defts' filings pursuant to sec 32 and 42−c of the medical plan ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3894 ORDER adopting findings [3797−1] amended 203rd and 204th reports, Vacating [3755−1] order. The payment of $11,137,250 pursuant to the orders of 7/23/87 and 1/10/91, as sanction in re crowding is SUSPENDED signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3895 ORDER in re the itemized stmt of time and expenses in the amt of $120,614.47 for the period of Jul 1, 1991 thru Jul 31, 1992. No objection being fld by any pty w/n 10 days of the date of this order, the stmt is approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3896

ORDER granting [3824−1] motion for Disbursement/transfer of Funds payable to the Treasury Dept (ELA) in the sum of $474,349.00 for the expansion of the DSCA program at Guerrero. Defts are to file a quarterly accounting detailing how the money is spent and describing services provided. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3897

ORDER the Clerk is to transfer the sum of $155,749 to the Treasury Dept of the Commonwealth of PR for deposit in acct no. 92−252−098−01−081, which shall be the sole repository of fine monies transferred for use at the Ponce pilot project. Defts are to file a detailed and complete quarterly accounting of all funds deposited or expended from this acct. The first quarterly report shall be fld no later than 10/10/92 fro all transactions thru 10/1/92, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3904 Minute entry: further hearing called. Testimony on behalf of defts hrd. Case cont for 8/19/92 at 9am. Defts' exhs F−J, adm. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/21/1992)

3898 MOTION req advance of allocation of funds for Expedited Bail Project's operating expenses during the week of 8/24/92 in the amt of $75,000 (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3899 MOTION for application req approval of reimbursement of Expedited Bail Project expenses for trip to Portland, Oregon during Oct 11−14, 1992 (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3900 TRANSCRIPT hrg re: req for relief at the State Penitentiary hld on 8/18/92 bef Judge Perez (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3901

Minute entry: sixth day of hrg on req fo relief at the State Penitentiary called. Request to videotape testimony of Garcia−Santiago is gtd. Further testimony for defts hrd. Case cont for tomorrrow at 9am. Plffs' exhs 30,31,32, and 33, adm. Defts' exhs K,L,N, and O, admit. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/20/1992)

3905 OPINION AND ORDER denying defts' oral motion req. an injunction barring counsel for pltfs from engaging in alleged ex−parte communications with officers and employees of the government and correctional system, and denying req. for sanctions for violation of Rule 4.2 of the Model Rules of Professional

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 55 of 513

08/20/1992 08/20/1992
08/20/1992 08/20/1992 08/20/1992 08/20/1992
08/20/1992
08/24/1992 08/25/1992 08/25/1992 08/25/1992 08/25/1992
08/26/1992 08/27/1992 08/27/1992 08/28/1992 08/28/1992 08/28/1992 08/31/1992

Responsibility. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/25/1992)

3902 TRANSCRIPT hrg re: mot for relief at the State Penitentiary hld on 8/19/92 bef Judge Perez. (np) (Entered: 08/21/1992)

3903

Minute entry: seventh day of hrg on the req for relief at the State Penitentiary called. Mr. Nachman informs that he has been ifnormed daily of the status of inmate GEe Sanchez Gerena's health condition. Further testimony for defts hrd. Matter stands SUBMITTED. Defts' exhs P,Q, and R, admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/21/1992)

3906 MOTION by Defendant−All to Vacate hrg of 7/27/92 and submitting remedial plan. (motion fld nun pro tunc as of 7/27/92) (el) (Entered: 08/25/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER denying [3906−1] motion to Vacate hrg of 7/27/92 and submitting remedial plan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/25/1992)

3907 ORDER, for reinvestment of funds in the amt of of $3,555,000.00 in U.S. Treasury Notes with Paine Webber as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/25/1992)

3908 ORDER Confirming and granting [3838−1] 209th report and the pymt of fine in the amt of $5,211,950.00 is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 08/25/1992)

3909 ORDER Confirming and granting [3857−1] 210th report and that the amt of $5,324,450.00 as fine is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 09/24/1992 (Entered: 08/25/1992)

3910 OBJECTION by Defendant−All to pltfs' counsel application for attys fees (el) (Entered: 08/25/1992)

Banco Central Managers check 381069 dtd 8/25/92 in the amt of $155,749.00 payable to the Treasury Dept fothe Commonwealth of PR. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

Banco Central Managers ck. #381068 dtd 8/25/92 in the amt of $474,349.00 payable to Secretary of the Treasury. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3911 Amended Report by Defendant−All re: inmates population of admission and releases during the month of July, 1992. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [3881−1] motion for a temporary and partial leave for lead counsel and to designate H. Nachman as substitute lead counsel, by atty C. Garcia Gutierrez. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

3912 Informative Motion re: Expedited Bail Project's July 1992 operating expenses, fld by Johnny Colon Gonzalez, Director of EBP. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3913 214th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3914 REPLY by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (Atty Pia Gallego) to response in opposition to motion for atty fees for the month of June, 1992 and motion for ruling on classification of tasks. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3915 REPLY by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to response in opposition to Dr. King's report and req. for hrg on King's report. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3915 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for setting of hrg on Dr. King's Report on Modition and time tables etc. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3916 Forty First Report of the EBP pursuant to Crt's Oorder of 4−28−92 re: it's operating expenses, etc. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3917 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: defts to contract RJAG rather than BRCA. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 56 of 513

08/31/1992 08/31/1992 08/31/1992 08/31/1992
09/01/1992 09/01/1992
09/01/1992 09/01/1992 09/01/1992 09/01/1992
09/01/1992
09/02/1992 09/02/1992 09/02/1992 09/03/1992 09/03/1992 09/03/1992

3918 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of the quarterly evaluation of the Dept of Health by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3919 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Produce and/or release videotape for production of copy (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3920 ORDER granting [3798−1] motion for increase in compensation for Administrative Assistants Melissa Hayes, Anthony Petropulous and Reinaldo Roman to $24,000. a year. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3921 ORDER granting [3875−1] 211th report of the Crt Monitor and the pymt of $5,708,800.00 as fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3922 MOTION by Defendant−All req. permanent discharge of fines for the six month period btwn Nov./1991 and May/92 . Response due 9/14/92 . (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3923 ORDER granting [3898−1] motion req advance of allocation of funds for Expedited Bail Project's operating expenses during the week of 8/24/92 in the amt of $75,000. Directing the Clerk to disburse to EBP the sum of $75,000. from the fund established by the Crt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3924 Letter MOTION for Attorney Fees for work performed from April to June 30, 1992, by Jorge A. Pierluisi Diaz, Special Master. (el) (Entered: 09/23/1992)

3925 Letter MOTION for Attorney Fees for services rendered by Dominguez & Totti for the month of May 1992 in the total amt of $531.00. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3926 Letter MOTION for Attorney Fees for services rendered by Dominguez & Totti for the month of June, 1992 in the total amt of $2,083.00. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3927

ORDER granting [3924−1] motion for Attorney Fees for work performed from April to June 30, 1992, by Jorge A. Pierluisi Diaz, Special Master., granting [3926−1] motion for Attorney Fees for services rendered by Dominguez & Totti for the month of June, 1992 in the total amt of $2,083.00., granting [3925−1] motion for Attorney Fees for services rendered by Dominguez & Totti for the month of May 1992 in the total amt of $531.00. Directing defts to deposit with the Clerk the sum of $2,614.00 and upon recpt of this deposit the Clerk shall disburse to the law firm of Dominguez & Totti the sum of $2,614.00.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3928 ORDER granting and approving [3924−1] motion for Attorney Fees for work performed from April to June 30, 1992, by Jorge A. Pierluisi Diaz, Special Master in the sum of $3,240.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3929 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 9/8/92 in which to file objections to the 208th Report by the Crt Monitor. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3930 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time in which to file translation to documents included in Application for Transfer of Funds, etc. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3931 APPLICATION by Defendant−All for Release and transfer of Funds to cover operational expenses of the Ponce Pilot Project during the current fiscal semester. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Banco Central Managers Check no. 381335 dtd 9/3/92 in the amt of $75,000.00 payable to Executive Bail Project. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3932 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,042.50 for the month of August, 1992 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3933 ORDER, Approving invoice no. 9032 for services provided for on−going support in the acctg management of this case and for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila de Corral & Co. for the month of July, 1992. ( signed by Judge

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 57 of 513

09/03/1992 09/04/1992 09/04/1992 09/04/1992 09/04/1992
09/04/1992 09/08/1992 09/08/1992 09/08/1992 09/08/1992 09/08/1992
09/08/1992 09/08/1992 09/09/1992 09/09/1992 09/09/1992
09/09/1992

Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (Invoice attchd) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3934 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 in the total amt of $8,756.50 by Atty Pia Gallegos. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Copy of rcpt #64010 in the amt of $54,704.25 re Registry fee. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3935 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses for the month of August, 1992. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3936 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 in the $2,301.25 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3937

APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for Disbursement and transfer of Funds in the amt of $350,000.00 to the Center of the Study of Law. This amt will be deposited in two separate accts created, that is the "Main Fine Account" which is used to pay experts and consultants and the second the "Faiver Fine Account" which is used to make paymts to Kenneth Faiver. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3938 APPLICATION by Defendant−All for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 for Attys Nachman and Fernandez Sein. (Attchmts) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3939 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 9/10/92 in which to file their objections to the 208th Report. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3940 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 in the amt of $1,286.70 for Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3941 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,832.96 for the month of August, 1992 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3942 217th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3943 ORDER granting [3937−1] motion for Disbursement and transfer of Funds in the amt of $350,000.00 to the Center of the Study of Law. The Clerk is hereby directed to transfer the sum of $350,000.00 to the Center.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3944 ORDER granting [3935−1] itemized stmt for the month of August, 1992 in the amt of $119,217.44. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3945 ORDER granting [3864−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $17,449.12 and expenses in the amt of $298.04 for the month of July 1992 for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3946 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to respond to deft's motion req. permanent discharge of fines (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3947 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order prohibiting reprisals and retaliatory actions against the pltfs who testified or who were present at the hrg on Rio Piedras Complex. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3948 ORDER: Confirming and granting [3876−1] 212th report of the Crt Monitor and the pymt of $5,482,950.00 of fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3949

ORDER denying [3931−1] motion for Release and transfer of Funds to cover operational expenses of the Ponce Pilot Project during the current fiscal semester. Defts have failed to comply with the August 18, 1992 Order in which all future application for funds be filed jointly by pltfs and defts. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 58 of 513

09/10/1992 09/10/1992 09/10/1992 09/10/1992 09/11/1992 09/11/1992
09/14/1992
09/14/1992 09/14/1992 09/15/1992 09/15/1992 09/15/1992 09/15/1992 09/15/1992 09/17/1992 09/17/1992 09/17/1992
09/18/1992 09/18/1992

3950 Fifty−Second Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates admissions and releases. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3951 OBJECTION by Defendant−All to [3884−1] 208th report by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3952 THIRD APPLICATION by Defendant−All for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $482,411.00 payable to the Treasury Dept in order to cover the expansion of the DSCA Program at Guerrero. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3953 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to file translation of documents attchd to application for transfer of funds. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3954 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation re document identified as Exhibit A of the Application for Transfer of Funds regarding Ponce Pilot Project by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3955 ORDER granting [3937−1] motion for Disbursement and transfer of Funds in the amt of $350,000.00 to the Center of the Study of Law. The Clerk is directed to transfer the sum of $350,000.00 from fines monies. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3956 ORDER granting [3882−1] Sixth report re the Program for the Rehabilitation of the Drug Users under Hogar Crea. Directing the Clerk toissue a check in the amt of $20,787.93 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3957 Seventh Report re: the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea pursuant to Crt's order of 1/13/92. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3958 188th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: Report conveying consultants review of defts' May 2, 1991 motion in compl/w Mental Health Plan. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3959 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg dates of August 19, 1992 before Judge Perez. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Banco Central Managers ck #392807 dtd 9/15/92 in the amt of $1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Banco Central Managers ck. #392804 dtd 9/15/92 in the amt of $20,787.93 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Banco Central Managers ck. #392806 in the amt of $17,747.16 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Banco Central Managers ck #392805 in the amt of $350,000.00 payable to the Center of Study for Law. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3960 Amended Fifty Second Report by Defendant−All re: inmates population of admissions and releases for the month of August, 1992. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3961 OBJECTION by Defendant−All to all of pltfs' application for atty fees for the month of August, 1992. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3962

NOTICE OF APPEAL from Opinion and Order of 8/19/92 allowing pltfs' counsel to engage in exparte communications with officers and employees of the government and correctional systems. Appeal record due on 9/28/92 by Heriberto Acevedo, Juanita Gomez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Isabel Suliveres, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Lorenzo Villalba, Rafael Hernandez−Colon . FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 64187 Transcript Order Form furnished to appellant. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3963 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: paragraph 12(b) of the 12/30/90 Stipulation. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

3964 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [3922−1] motion req. permanent discharge of fines for the six month period btwn Nov./1991 and May/92 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 59 of 513

09/21/1992 09/21/1992 09/22/1992 09/22/1992 09/23/1992
09/24/1992 09/24/1992 09/25/1992
09/28/1992
09/28/1992
09/29/1992 09/29/1992 09/29/1992 09/29/1992 09/29/1992
09/30/1992
09/30/1992 09/30/1992 09/30/1992 09/30/1992

3965 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of document attchd to the Third Application for Transfer of Funds by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)
3966 213th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: conveying medical consultant's findings of site visits conducted 4−25−92. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)
3967 REPLY by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (Harvey Nachman) to response in opposition to pltf's application for atty fees. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)
3968 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Strike [3951−1] objections to the 208th report by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)
3969 215th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: defts' progress toward compl/w their Mental Health Plan as assessed by the Crts consultants in Dec. 1991 and March 1992. (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)
3970 MOTION by Defendant−All for Leave to File reply to pltfs' opposition to defts "Motion req. permanent discharge of fines". (el) (Entered: 09/24/1992)
3971 Informative Motion re: EPB operating expenses for the month of August, 1992. (el) (Entered: 09/29/1992)
3972 MOTION by Vincent M. Nathan to Amend and correct all the reports of the Monitor concerning overpopulation and fine assessments from January 31, 1991 to date. (el) (Entered: 09/29/1992)
3973 ORDER, to Amend [3890−1] order nunc pro tunc re the recommendations which were attached to the order confirming and approving the 202nd Report of the Crt Monitor on HIV/AIDS Focused Study. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3974 ORDER, to Amend nunc pro tunc [3893−1] order adopting and apprvg the 191st Report of the Crt Monitor and including the recommendations which were to be attached to said order. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3975 ORDER, Sealing Document(s) pages of Appendix A re the 213th Report dkt. #3966 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3976 MOTION by Defendant−All to Withdraw [3951−1] objection to the 208th Report by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3977 Second Amended Fifty−Second Report by Defendant−All re: inmates population of admissions and releases. (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3978 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order confirming the 218th Report of the Crt Monitor. (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3979 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [3963−1] motion information re para 12(b) of the December 30, 1990 Stipulation by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3980 MOTION SUBMITTING video−testimony of Ramon Garcia Santiago to be fld as part of the proceedings regarding the State Penitentiary hrg. (3 Video tapes submitted and given to Mr. Anthony Figueroa to file away at the Exhibit Section) (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3981 Forty Second Report re: EBP operating expenses. (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3982 218th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3983 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $12,860.01 payable to Steve J. Martin for expert fees. (el) (Entered: 10/01/1992)
3988 ORDER granting [3957−1] Seventh report re the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug User, and for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $18,869.68 to Hogares Crea, Inc. The Clerk shall issue a check in said amt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 60 of 513

10/01/1992 10/01/1992 10/01/1992 10/01/1992 10/01/1992 10/01/1992
10/02/1992 10/02/1992 10/02/1992 10/02/1992 10/02/1992 10/02/1992 10/05/1992 10/05/1992 10/05/1992
10/06/1992

3984 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees of Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for the month of September,1992 in the amt of $1,131.00. (el) Modified on 10/02/1992 (Entered: 10/02/1992)

3985 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees of Atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of September, 1992 in the amt of $4,056.75. (el) (Entered: 10/02/1992)

3986 MOTION for setting aside and investment of funds in the amt of $196,136.00 for the implementation of an electronic monitoring program for pretrial detainees for a twelve period by EBP Director Johnny Colon. (el) (Entered: 10/02/1992)

3987 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses for Atty Pia Gallegos for the month of September, 1992 in the total amt of $11,067.51. (el) (Entered: 10/02/1992)

3989 ORDER, Apprvg the application adn appointing Christopher Jenkins and Arron Guevara to serve as Deputy Court Monitor and both are to be compensated at $42,000.00 a yr. plus benefits. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3990

ORDER granting [3952−1] motion for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $482,411.00 payable to the Treasury Dept in order to cover the expansion of the DSCA Program at Guerrero. The Clerk shall issue a check to the Secretary of Treasury in the amt of $482,411.00 and directing defts to file a quarterly acct detailing how the money is spent and describing services provided. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3991 MOTION SUBMITTING Fire Department Inspections and corrective action plans by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3992 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time in which to file English translation to documents submitting re Fire Dept. Plans. (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3993 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of September for Atty Harvey Nachman. (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3994 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order confirming the 215th Report of the Crt Monitor, dkt. #3969 re Mental Health Plan. (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3995 RECOMMENDATION/MOTION by Vincent M. Nathan and Special Advisory Committee to request order in order to supplement pymt of tuition from fine monies for inmates enrolled in the Sedue Program of the Universidad Metropolitana. (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3996 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Harry Anduze Montano in the amt of $2,889.12 and expenses in the amt of $22.58 for the month of September, 1992. (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3997 JOINT MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Disbursement and transfer of Funds in the amt of $2,077,595.00 to cover operational expenses of the Ponce Pilot during the current fiscal semester. (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3998 JOINT MOTION SUBMITTING transcript of testimony of Ramon Garcia Santiago, Esq., in the matter of the State Penitentiary hrg., by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 10/06/1992)

3999

ORDER granting and apprvg [3995−1] motion to request order in order to supplement pymt of tuition from fine monies for inmates enrolled in the Sedue Program of the Universidad Metropolitana. Further orderd that upon rcpt and apprvl oftuition stmts submitted by the Universidad Metropolitana for each of the inmates enrolled in the SEDUE programfor 1992−93 academis yr, the Crt will enter an appropriate order for the pymt of the tuition. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/08/1992)

4000 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan to Extend Time to 10 days in which to submitted Appendixx B to the 213th Report of the Crt Monitor. (el) (Entered: 10/08/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 61 of 513

10/06/1992 10/07/1992 10/07/1992 10/07/1992 10/07/1992 10/07/1992
10/07/1992 10/08/1992 10/08/1992 10/08/1992 10/08/1992 10/08/1992 10/08/1992
10/08/1992
10/08/1992 10/08/1992
10/08/1992

4001 Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: itemized stmt of time and expenses of the Crt. Monitor's Office for the month of September, 1992. (el) (Entered: 10/08/1992)

Banco Central Managers ck. #393391 dtd 10/7/92 in the amt of$482,411.00 payable to the Secretary of Treasury. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

Banco Central Managers ck. #393390 dtd 10/7/92 in the amt of $18,869.68 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. re program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Crea. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4002 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $841.50 for the month of September, 1992 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4003 MOTION by Defendant−All to Dismiss/withdraw penal social worker Ms. Cotto and to appt another social worker to attend to the needs of the federal inmates. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4004 ORDER granting [3913−1] 214th report of the Crt Monitor and the pymt of $5,076,500.00 as fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 10/21/1992 (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4005 ORDER granting [4001−1] re itemized stmt of time and expenses in the amt of $95,642.20. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [3849−1] noted on motion for compliance w/order of 3/30/90 re: quarterly evaluation of the Dept of Health ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [3970−1] motion for Leave to File reply to pltfs' opposition to defts "Motion req. permanent discharge of fines". ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4006 ORDER granting [3868−1] itemized stmt in the amt of $120,614.47 for the month of July, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER mooting [3946−1] motion to Extend Time to respond to deft's motion req. permanent discharge of fines ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER mooting [3919−1] motion to Produce and/or release videotape for production of copy ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4007 ORDER, that the preparation of comments to proposals made by the monitor as well as preparation for negotiations be reimbursed at the "medium" rate. Parties are further ordered to settle the amt that must be reimbursed, if any, based on this assessment. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4008

ORDER, that defts refrain from taking any retaliatory actions at any time against members of the pltfs class who cooperated or assisted in any way in the hrg on the Rio Piedras Complex. Defts counsel personally serve all superintendents of the Rio Piedras Complex with this order. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4009 ORDER granting [3935−1] itemized stmt in the amt of $119,217.44 for the month of August, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4010

ORDER, Directing Atty Harvey Nachman and Jose Fernandez Sein to detail the sum of hours worked in each category, multiplied by the appropriate compensation, as well as provide the total amt in fees and costs per month re the atty fees motions for the month of June, July and August. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4011 ORDER, Directing the Clerk to issue forthwith a check in the amt of $13,875.00 to Dr. Cynthia Casanova for services rendered as an expert thru the period of 12/15/90 through 7/14/92. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 62 of 513

10/08/1992 10/08/1992 10/08/1992 10/08/1992 10/09/1992 10/09/1992 10/09/1992 10/09/1992 10/09/1992
10/09/1992
10/09/1992
10/09/1992
10/09/1992

10/21/1992)

4012 REPLY by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to response to [3938−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 for Attys Nachman and Fernandez Sein. by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4013 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to clarify motion to Compel the Monitor to amend reports. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4014 REPLY by Defendant−All to response to [3922−1] motion req. permanent discharge of fines for the six month period btwn Nov./1991 and May/92 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4015 OBJECTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (Pia Gallegos) to objections for July and August, 1992 atty fees motion for Atty Pia Gallegos. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4016 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to file English translation of motion titled "Second Accounting Report Regarding Expenditures for the DSCA Expansion at Guerrero." (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4017 Second Accounting Report by Defendant−All re: expenditures for the DSCA expansion at Guerrero for the May−August period. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4018 ORDER Confirming and approving [3942−1] 217th report of the Crt Monitor and the pymt of $4,813,450.00 of fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4019 ORDER, Directing parties to submit proposed findings of fact and conclusion of law memorandum for the Court's consideration in framing its opinion and order due 10/29/92 for Carlos Morales−Feliciano, for Defendant−All ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4020

ORDER granting [3865−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $5,070.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. granting [3940−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 in the amt of $1,286.70 for Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. Directing the Clerk to advance to Carlos Ramos Gonzalez the total sum of $6,356.70 for fees. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4021

ORDER granting [3861−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,263.52 and expenses in the sum of $24.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. granting [3941−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,832.96 for the month of August, 1992 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. The clerk is directed to advance the total sum of $6,120.48 for fees to Harry Anduze Montano. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4022

ORDER granting [3856−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $648.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Nora Rodriguez Matias. granting [3932−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,042.50 for the month of August, 1992 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. Directing the Clerk to advance Atty Rodriguez Matias the sum of $2,352.00 for fees.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4023

ORDER granting [3788−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $1,782.50 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. granting [3863−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $7,462.50 plus expenses in the amt of $357.50 for a total of $7,820.00 for the month of July, 1992 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. granting [3936−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 in the $2,301.25 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. Directing the Clerk to advance to Atty Williams the sum of $11,903.75 for fees.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4024

ORDER granting [3781−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $12,250.46 for the month of June, 1992 for Atty Pia Gallegos granting [3853−1] motion for Attorney Fees of atty Pia Gallegos for the month of July 1992 in the amt of $18,825.63 and office expenses in the amt of $260.27 for a total of $19,085.90. granting [3934−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of August, 1992 in the

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 63 of 513

10/13/1992
10/13/1992 10/13/1992 10/13/1992 10/15/1992
10/15/1992 10/15/1992 10/15/1992 10/15/1992 10/19/1992
10/19/1992 10/19/1992 10/19/1992
10/19/1992 10/20/1992
10/20/1992
10/21/1992

total amt of $8,756.50 by Atty Pia Gallegos. Directing the Clerk to advance Atty Gallegos the sum of $40,176.86 for fees. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4025 MOTION SUBMITTING exhibit entitled "Counsel's Joint Response to Experts Recommendations for Temporary Institutional Caps" by Defendant−All. (Exhibit 1 of Reply to pltfs Opposition to defts motion req. permanent discharge of fines. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4026 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 10−20−92 to oppose pltfs' motion to amend and correct all the reports of the monitor re fine assessments from 1−31−91 to date. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4027 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano consenting for Hearing re permanent discharge of fine by deft. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4028 Eighth Report re: Program for the rehabilitation of Drug User under the Auspices of Hogar Crea. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4029 ORDER Confirming and granting [3982−1] 218th report of the Court Monitor and the pymt of $4,153,100.00 as fine is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4030 Fifty Third Report by Defendant−All re: report of inmates popultion of admission and releases. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4031 MOTION by Defendant−All for Leave to File the 53rd report (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4032 Letter MOTION for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 for services rendered related to the acctg of this case by Vila del Corral & Co. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4033 219th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4034 ORDER Apprvg and granting [3969−1] 215th report of the Crt Monitor on defts progress toward compl/w their mental health plan, etc. The Crt hereby adopts the findings of fact contained in it as its own. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4035 ORDER Adopting and granting [3884−1] 208th report as its own. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4036 ORDER Adopting and granting [3966−1] 213th report conveying consultants' findings of site visits conducted 4−25−92 thru 4−28−92. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4037 MOTION SUBMITTING RJAG Preliminary Audit Reports by Defendant−All. (Bulky folders with reports of various institutions re the rehabilitation program)(These folders are kept at the Exhibit Section of File Room) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4038 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of the Corrective Action Plans for the Fire Control Quarterly Evaluation by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4039 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [3972−1] motion to Amend and correct all the reports of the Monitor concerning overpopulation and fine assessments from January 31, 1991 to date. by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4040 MOTION in compliance of Crt Order of 10−8−92 and SUBMITTING time expended in ea category for compensation for attys fees for the months sof June, July and August for Attys Nachman and Fernandez Sein by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)
4041 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan to request order directing defts to deposit the sum of $500,000.00 to replenish the fund established for pymt of fees and expenses , and for the Clerk to Disburse Funds to the Center for the Study of law once the defts

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 64 of 513

10/21/1992 10/21/1992 10/21/1992 10/21/1992 10/21/1992
10/22/1992 10/22/1992 10/22/1992 10/22/1992 10/22/1992 10/22/1992 10/22/1992 10/23/1992
10/23/1992 10/23/1992 10/23/1992 10/26/1992 10/26/1992

have deposited said amt. (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4042 MOTION SUBMITTING an acctg of expenditures of fine funds for the months of August and September, 1992 by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [3983−1] motion for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $12,860.01 payable to Steve J. Martin for expert fees. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/21/1992)

4043 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Correct/clarify motion to amend all Monitor's report on population. (el) (Entered: 10/22/1992)

4044 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order to approve dkt. #3867 Dr. Lambert King amended report. (el) (Entered: 10/22/1992)

4045

ORDER temporarily granting [3997−1] joint motion for Disbursement and transfer of Funds in the amt of $2,077,595.00 to cover operational expenses of the Ponce Pilot during the current fiscal semester. No transfer of these funds shall be made, however, until defts' first quarterly acctg pursuant to crts order of 8−18−92 has been fld and appvd. Further order that the joint req. for appvl of an independent auditor to be paid from fine monies is denied, subject to reconsideration by the court upon defts' filing of their first quarterly acctg. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/22/1992)

4046 Letter MOTION for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 for services rendered in the management of the acctg of funds in this case by Vila del Corral & Company. (el) (Entered: 10/23/1992)

4047 Informative Motion re: EBP operating expenses for the month of September, 1992. (el) (Entered: 10/23/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER's CHECK #39378 DTD 10/22/92 in the amt of $6,120.48 payable to Atty Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 10/26/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER CHECK #393799, dtd 10/22/92 in the amt of $11,903.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for atty fees and costs. (el) (Entered: 10/26/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #393800 dtd 10/22/92 in the amt of $40,176.86 payable to Pia Gallegos for atty fees and costs. (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS Ck # 393796 dtd 10/23/92 in the amt of $2,352.00 payable to Nora Rodriguez Matias for attys fees. (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #393797 IN THE AMT OF $6,356.70 payable to Atty Carlos Ramos Gonzalez for atty fees. (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

Certified and transmitted Record on Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: [3962−1] appeal by Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Lorenzo Villalba, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Isabel Suliveres, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juanita Gomez, Heriberto Acevedo (el) (Entered: 10/26/1992)

4048 ORDER granting [4001−1] itemized stmt for the month of September, 1992 in the amt of $95,642.20. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/26/1992)

4049 Amended Fifty third Report by Defendant−All re report of population and of admissions and releases of inmates. (el) (Entered: 10/26/1992)

4050 Forty Third Financial Report re: EBP operational expenses. (el) (Entered: 10/26/1992)

4051 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: pltfs' motion consenting to a hrg. (el) (Entered: 10/27/1992)

4052 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to be relieved as lead counsel and to re name Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. as lead counsel. (el) (Entered: 10/27/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 65 of 513

10/26/1992 10/27/1992 10/27/1992 10/27/1992 10/27/1992
10/27/1992 10/27/1992 10/28/1992 10/28/1992 10/28/1992 10/28/1992 10/28/1992
10/28/1992
10/28/1992 10/28/1992 10/30/1992
10/30/1992

4053 MOTION SUBMITTING first quarterly acctg report regarding the Ponce Pilot Project by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 10/27/1992)

4054 OBJECTION by Defendant−All to pltfs' application for atty fees for the month of September, 1992. (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

4055 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

4056 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time of 20 days in which to file the English translation of exh to motion enclosing First Quarterly Acctg Report Regarding the Ponce Pilot. (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

4057 ORDER Approving and granting [4033−1] 219th report of the Crt Monitor and the pymt of $3,588,450.00 of fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

Letter (Finance Clerk) enclosing ck #393795 from Banco Central Corp in the amt of $13,875.00 payable to Dr. Cynthia Casanova pursuant to Crt's Order of 10/8/92. (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

4058 MOTION SUBMITTING Appendix B to the 213th Report and a sealed list of the names of the inmates identified in Appendix B as having been interviewed or whose records were reviewed by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

4059 ORDER granting [4028−1] Hogar Crea 8th report, and Directing the Clerk to issue check for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $26,222.09 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 10/28/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL CK #393990 dtd 10/28/92 in the amt of $75,000.00 payable to Eexpedited Bail Project for EBP expenses for the months of November and December, 1992. (el) (Entered: 10/29/1992)

4060 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to 11−6−92 in which to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law re the hrgs on the Rio Piedras prison. (el) (Entered: 10/29/1992)

4061 216th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: Expansion of the Dept. of Services to counter addition's program at Guerrero. (el) (Entered: 10/29/1992)

4062 ORDER, for investment transactions with Paine Webber, Inc. in the following manner: The SALE of U.S. Treasury Note with a face value of $2,140,000.00 etc, and the PURCHASE of U.S. Teasury Note with a face value of $2,256,000.00, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4063

MOTION SUBMITTING deposit in the total amt of $41,206.69 (rcpt #64714) in compl/w Crts Order apprvg fees and expenses incurred by Special Master, Jorge Pierluissi and Dominguexz & Totti in the total amt of $5,854.00 and the apprvl of EBP expenditures in the total amt of $35,352.69 for the month of July, 1992 Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4064 MOTION SUBMITTING deposit in the amt of $27,940.61 (rcpt #64714) for expenditures incurred by EBP for the month of August, 1992 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4065 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: compliance w/Crt's order of 10/8/92 directing defts' counsel to serve all superintendents of the Rio Piedras Complex with a copy of the referred order. (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4066 ORDER, Directing parties to file brief setting forth the arguments in support of its position re the motion requesting permanent Discharge of Fines and setting Brief deadline to 12/21/92 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4067 ORDER temporarily denying [3972−1] motion to Amend and correct all the reports of the Monitor concerning overpopulation and fine assessments from January 31, 1991 to date., and Directing the Crt Monitor to file calculations of the extent of crowding based on pltfs' interpretation of 12/30/91 stipulation and setting Motion

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 66 of 513

10/30/1992
10/30/1992 10/30/1992 10/30/1992
10/30/1992 11/02/1992 11/04/1992 11/04/1992 11/04/1992
11/05/1992 11/05/1992 11/05/1992 11/06/1992 11/06/1992 11/06/1992 11/06/1992

Filing deadline to 12/21/92 This calculation together with the reports the monitor has filed, will provide the Crt with data in support of each party's contentions regarding deft's September 1 motion requesting permanent discharge of fines.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4068 ORDER denying [3986−1] motion for setting aside and investment of funds in the amt of $196,136.00 for the implementation of an electronic monitoring program for pretrial detainees for a twelve period by EBP Director Johnny Colon. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 04/30/1993 (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4069 MOTION SUBMITTING the quarterly evaluation of the Dept of Health together with the corresponding action plans and in compliance with Crt Order of 3−30−90 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4070 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to file English translation of the documents submitted with dkt #4069. (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4071 MOTION SUBMITTING report identifying those expenditures allocated for the improvement of housekeeping, maintenance and sanitation in all correctional facilities and in compliance with the Environmental Plan by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4072 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 11/17/92 in which to file revised manuals as ordered by the Crt on 8/18/92. (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4073 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $10,694.59 for the month of October, 1992 for Atty Pia Gallegos. (el) (Entered: 11/04/1992)

4074 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,291.50 for the month of October, 1992 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. (el) (Entered: 11/05/1992)

4075 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $553.80 for the month of October, 1992 for Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. (el) (Entered: 11/05/1992)

4076

ORDER granting [3997−1] joint motion for Disbursement and transfer of Funds in the amt of $2,077,595.00 to cover operational expenses of the Ponce Pilot during the current fiscal semester, and directing the Clerk to disburse and issue a check for the sum of $2,077,595.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 11/05/1992)

4077 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses for the month of October, 1992 for Atty Harvey B. Nachman. (el) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

4078 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,598.40 and expenses in the amt of $19.00 for the month of October, 1992 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

4079 REPLY by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to response to [3987−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses for Atty Pia Gallegos for the month of September, 1992 in the total amt of $11,067.51. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 11/06/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER CK #398136 dtd 11/6/92 in the amt of $2,614.00 payable to the Law Firm of Dominguez & Totti for services rendered. (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #398137 dtd 11/6/92 in the amt of $3,240.00 payable to Jorge A. Pierluisi−Diaz for services rendered from April thru June 30, 1992. (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #393991 dtd 10/28/92 in the amt of $26,222.09 payable to Hogares Crea. (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4080 MOTION by Defendant−All supplementing dkt. #4069 referring to: the enclosure of the quarterly evaluations of the Dept of Health together with the corresponding action plans for everay penal institution and submitting now the evaluations of three institutions inadvertently ommitted with the filing of the reports on 10−30−92. (el)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 67 of 513

11/06/1992 11/06/1992 11/09/1992 11/09/1992 11/10/1992 11/12/1992
11/12/1992 11/12/1992 11/12/1992 11/12/1992 11/13/1992 11/13/1992 11/13/1992
11/16/1992 11/16/1992 11/17/1992 11/17/1992

(Entered: 11/16/1992)

4081 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of October, 1992 in the amt of $6,398.10 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4082 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,258.40 plus expenses of $121.96 for the month of October, 1992 to Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4083 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: expenditures of time and expenses for the period of 10−1−92 thru 10−31−92 in the amt of $130,567.78. (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4084 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of documents annexed to the Second Acctg Report Regarding Expenditures for the DSCA Expansion of Guerrero fld 10−9−92 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4085 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of documents included with the Motion enclosing First Quarterly Acctg Report Regarding the Ponce Pilot Project fld on 10−26−92 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4086

ORDER Adapting and granting [3958−1] 188th report of the Crt Monitor and directing the deft to implement certain recommendations of the monitor's expert consultant Dr. Dennis Koson. Directing defts to file the interagency agreement, the execution of which they promised in their July 13, 1990 Informative Motion within 30 days following the entry of this order. Simultaneously, defts shall file any supplemental policies and procedures for discharging patients from hospital−level care that have been developed pursuant to the interagency agrmt btwn the Admin. of Corrections and the Dept. of Health. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4087 Fifty−Fourth Report by Defendant−All re: inmates population and amts of admissions and releases for the month of October, 1992. (el) (Entered: 11/16/1992)

4088 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [4044−1] motion to request order to approve dkt. #3867 Dr. Lambert King amended report. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4089 MOTION SUBMITTING Preliminary Audit Report by RJAG by Defendant−All (Several envelopes submitted) (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

Letter (Finance Clerk) enclosing ck no. 393795 from Banco Central Corp in the amt of $13,875.00 to Dr. Cynthia Casanova. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4090 JOINT MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to November 19, 1992 for the submission of the proposed findings of fact and conclusion of law. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4091 ORDER granting [4083−1] itemized stmt for the month of Oct, 1992 in the amt of $130,567.78. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4092 ORDER Directing defts to deposit, upon rcpt of the amt of $2,077,595.00, said monies in the acct whick hold all fines monies transferred to support the Ponce Pilot Project. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 04/30/1993 (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4093 Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: recalculation of overcrowding throughout the Administration of Corrections and in compl./with Crt's order of 10−29−92. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4094 Ninth Report re: Program for the rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4095 MOTION SUBMITTING accounting of expenditures and deposits of fine monies for October, 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)

4096 MOTION by Defendant−All to Amend [4090−1] joint motion to Extend Time to November 19, 1992 for the submission of the proposed findings of fact and

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 68 of 513

11/18/1992
11/18/1992 11/18/1992
11/18/1992 11/20/1992 11/20/1992 11/20/1992 11/23/1992 11/23/1992 11/24/1992 11/25/1992 11/25/1992 11/25/1992 11/25/1992 11/25/1992
11/25/1992 11/25/1992 11/30/1992 11/30/1992
11/30/1992 12/01/1992

conclusion of law. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4041−1] motion to request order directing defts to deposit the sum of $500,000.00 to replenish the fund established for pymt of fees and expenses, granting [4041−2] motion for the Clerk to Disburse Funds to the Center for the Study of law once the defts have deposited said amt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
4097 Informative Motion re: EBP invoice for the month of October, 1992 for operating expenses in the sum of $44,726.53. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
4098 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 11/24/92 in which to submit the manual of policies and procedures required by the Mental Health Plan. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
4099 MOTION SUBMITTING first quarterly report prepare by RJA Group with attchmts, Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
4100 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 11−23−92 tofile the proposed finding of facts and conclusion of law. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
4101 MOTION to Amend application of 3/19/92 of the EBP for relocation of office nunc pro tunc. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
4102 MOTION SUBMITTING addendum to application requesting approval of reimbursement of EBP expenses. (el) (Entered: 11/23/1992)
4103 Amended Fifty Fourth Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates' admission and releases for the month of Oct. 1992. (el) (Entered: 11/24/1992)
4104 MOTION SUBMITTING Proposed findings of facts and conclusions of law by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/24/1992)
4112 MOTION SUBMITTING manuals of policies and procedures by Defendant−All. (Attachment of manual in Spanish) (el) (Entered: 12/02/1992)
4105 OBJECTION by Defendant−All to counsel application for attys fees for the month of October, 1992. (el) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
4106 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Leave to File proposed findings of fact and conclusion of law. (el) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
4107 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW by pltfs. (el) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
4108 PROPOSED CONCLUSIONS OF LAW and proposed remedy by pltf. (el) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
4109 193rd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: Conveying Mental Health Expert's review of defts' Plan filed pursuant to Section 28 of the Mental Health Plan. (el) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
4110 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 20 days in which to file English translation of documents filed w/Fire Prevention Surveys. (el) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
4111 MOTION SUBMITTING Fire Prevention Surveys by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 11/30/1992)
4113 MOTION SUBMITTING manual of psychotropic Medication and Clinical Services by Defendant−All. (Attachment of manual in Spanish) (el) (Entered: 12/02/1992)
4114 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 30 days in which to file English translation of the attchmts of the manuals of policies and procedures fld. (el) (Entered: 12/02/1992)
4115 221st Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 12/02/1992)
4116 223rd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: report on the status of the Pretrial Intake Center at the State Penitentiary. (el) (Entered: 12/02/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 69 of 513

12/01/1992 12/02/1992 12/02/1992 12/03/1992 12/03/1992 12/03/1992 12/03/1992 12/04/1992 12/04/1992 12/04/1992 12/04/1992 12/04/1992 12/07/1992 12/07/1992 12/07/1992 12/08/1992 12/09/1992 12/10/1992 12/10/1992 12/10/1992

4117 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of documents attchd to Motion in Compliance fld on 10−30−92 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 12/02/1992)
4118 ORDER granting [4094−1] Ninth report of Hogar Crea, and Directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds and issue a check in the amt of $17,730.93 to Hogares Crea. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 12/03/1992)
4119 MOTION SUBMITTING contract entered btwn AOC and its consultant, Paul Macias by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 12/03/1992)
4120 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $9,555.00 and the amt of $213.33 for office expenses for Atty Pia Gallegos. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4121 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4122 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $507.00 for Atty Ramos Gonzalez. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4123 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $5,476.64 and expenses in the amt of $307.98 for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4124 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 for Att6y Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4125 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $3,037.00 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4126 APPLICATION by EBP to request order to authorize the EBP to open an interest bearing acct, etc. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4127 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $2,016.00 for Atty Jose Fernandez Sein. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4128 NOTICE of by Carlos Morales−Feliciano of change of address and that new postal address is P.O. Box 19855, San Juan, PR 00910. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4129 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $1,984.32 and expenses in the amt of $21,87 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4130 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $1,260.00 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4131 Forty−Fourth Financial Report by EBP re: in compliance with Crt's order of 4/28/88. (el) (Entered: 12/08/1992)
4132 STATUS REPORT of Rio Piedras Complex by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 12/09/1992)
4133 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan to Amend recommendation Two of the [4061−1] 216th report on the expansion fo the Dept. of Services to counter addition's Program at Guerrero by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)
4134 Informative Motion by Carlos Morales−Feliciano re: lead counsel Garcia Gutierrez' absence from 12−11−92 thru 12−20−92 and that Atty Fernandez Sein will be available to take any decision on emergent matters. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)
4135 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 12−16−92 in which to file the 45th report pursuant to 4−28−88 Crt Order. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)
4136 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to 12−18−92 in which to file a supplemental brief on pltfs' position with respect to the 12−30−91 Stipulation. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 70 of 513

12/10/1992 12/10/1992 12/10/1992 12/10/1992 12/10/1992 12/11/1992 12/11/1992
12/14/1992
12/14/1992 12/14/1992 12/14/1992 12/14/1992 12/14/1992 12/15/1992 12/15/1992 12/15/1992 12/15/1992 12/16/1992 12/16/1992

4137 OBJECTION by Defendant−All to all applications for atty fees for the month of November, 1992. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4138 ORDER granting [4052−1] motion to be relieved as lead counsel and to re name Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. as lead counsel. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4139 ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila de Corral & Co. for services of acctg management in this case. (Copy of Invoice No. 9287 attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S Ck #399639 dtd 12/10/92 in the amt of $1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S ck #399638 dtd 12/10/92 payable to Hogar Crea re 9th Report of the Program. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4140 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 12−24−92 in which to respond to the 193rd Report. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4141 AMENDED ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds and directing the clerk to issue a check in the amt of $1,000.000.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in special acct. (This amends order dkt. 4092) signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4142

ORDER granting [4126−1] motion to request order to authorize the EBP to open an interest bearing acct, etc. Directing the Director of EBP to transfer funds reimbursed by the local courts to this int. bearing bank acct until a balance of one million dollars is reached. The Executive Director is authorized to w/d funds from this acct solely for the purpose of paying forfeitures of bail as ordered by the local courts. After this balance is reached, ALL ADDITIONAL MONIES REIMBURSED BY THE LOCAL COURTS SHALL BE DEPOSITED WITH THE CLERK OF COURT. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4143 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of the Fire Prevention surveys completed by the Fire Dept of PR by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4144 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 12−18−92 in which to file brief regarding its position on the 12−30−91 stipulation. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4145 10th Report re: Program for the rehabilitation of Drug Users under Hogar Crea, by Director of Program Elliot Alicea. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4146 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses for the month of November, 1992. (el) (Entered: 12/15/1992)

4155 ORDER the Clerk is to issue a check in the amt of $1,000,000 to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in acct #92−252−098−01−081 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

4147 ORDER granting [4146−1] Crt Monitor's itemized stmt of time and expenses for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $111,233.38. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 12/16/1992)

4148 Informative Motion by EBP re: EBP November, 1992 invoice of operating expenses with attachments. (el) (Entered: 12/16/1992)

4149 Forty Fifth Financial Report by EBP re: bail releases and costs, special accts, forfeitures, etc. (el) (Entered: 12/16/1992)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #399744 in the amt of $1,000.000.00 payable to Treasury of the Commonwealth of P.R. (el) (Entered: 12/16/1992)

4150 Amended 54th Report by Defendant−All re: inmate's population and of admissions and releases for the month of October, 1992. (el) (Entered: 12/21/1992)

4151 54th Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates and of admissions and releases for the month of November, 1992. (el) (Entered: 12/21/1992)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 71 of 513

12/16/1992 12/18/1992
12/18/1992
12/18/1992
12/18/1992 12/18/1992 12/18/1992 12/21/1992 12/21/1992 12/21/1992 12/22/1992 12/23/1992 12/23/1992 12/23/1992

4152 FOURTH APPLICATION by Defendant−All for Release/transfer of Funds in the amt of $554,058.00 payable to the Treasury Dept in order to cover the expenditures of the DSCA program at Guerrero. (el) (Entered: 12/21/1992)

4153

ORDER regarding conditions at State Penitentiary complex that defts' objections to the 174th report of the Crt Monitor−−report on water shortgage at the State Penitentiary are OVERRULED, and the crt confirms that report and adopts the findings of fact set forth therein in all respects. Every 60 days defts shall file a report of progress toward compliance at the State Penitentiary complex w/the extant remedial orders of this Crt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/21/1992)

4154

ORDER confirming and granting [4115−1] 221st report of the Crt Monitor −− 153rd report pursuant to the Crts order of 7−23−87. That the payment of $3,651,750 pursuant to the Crt order of 1−10−91, as a sanction for continuing contempt relating to unconstitutional crowding in PR's correctional institutions is suspended as per 12−30−91 stipulation re population mgmt and a pilot project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/21/1992)

4156

ORDER approving [4044−1] motion to request order to approve dkt. #3867 Dr. Lambert King amended report. The amended recommendations are approved in all respects. Defts are enjoined to employ a Chief Health Care Coordinator pursuant to the terms of those recommendations for a period of at least 3 yrs. No later than Mar 1, 1993, defts shall file a table of organization for the delivery of medical and mental health care. No later than 1/15/93 defts shall commence the publication of notices recommended by Dr. King. The orientation and initial employment of the Chief Health Coordinator shall commence no later than 5/1/93, and the orientation period shall be completed by 6/15/93 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

4157 SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE w/memo of law by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [3922−1] motion req. permanent discharge of fines for the six month period btwn Nov./1991 and May/92 by Defendant−All (np) Modified on 12/22/1992 (Entered: 12/22/1992)

4158 RESPONSE by Defendant−All w/exhs 1−4 in opposition to [3922−1] motion req. permanent discharge of fines for the six month period btwn Nov./1991 and May/92 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

4159 MOTION SUBMITTING by Defendant−All 15th mot in compliance w/the 8/18/88 crt order in re: sealed envelope w/copies of time records for the time spent in the representation of defts covering the period of Jul 1, 1992 until Sep 30, 1992. (np) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

4160 MOTION SUBMITTING by Vincent M. Nathan NOMINATIONS of persons to serve on Special Advisory Committee (np) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

4161 MOTION SUBMITTING by Vincent M. Nathan accounting of expenditures of fine monies for Nov 1992 (np) (Entered: 12/22/1992)

CHECK #399952 dtd 12−21−92 in the amt of $75,000 payable to Expedited Bail Project (np) (Entered: 12/29/1992)

4162

ORDER confirming in all respects [4116−1] 223rd report of the Crt Monitor. That defts shall cont to house no more than one inmate in each cell of housing units B−1 and C−1, That four cells in each of housing units B−1 and C−1 remain closed pursuant to the 11/4/91 order approving the 5/30/91 stipulation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/29/1992)

4163 ORDER the Clerk is to issue a check in the amt of $1,077,595.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury of P.R. for deposit in acct #92−252−098−01−081. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/29/1992)

4164 224th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: conveying mental health consultants' report of the Aug 17−20, 1992 mental health audit (np) (Entered: 12/29/1992)

4165 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for Leave to File under seal exh B of the 224th report conveying mental health consultants' report of Aug 17−20 ,1992 mental

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 72 of 513

12/28/1992
12/28/1992
12/28/1992 12/30/1992 12/30/1992 12/30/1992 12/30/1992 12/31/1992 12/31/1992 01/04/1993 01/04/1993

health audit w/envelope. (np) (Entered: 12/29/1992)

4166

ORDER adopting and approving [3966−1] 213th report of Crt Monitor conveying medical consultant's findings of site visits conducted Apr 25−28, 1992, including Appendices A and B, as well as the recommendations in sec XV of Appendix B. That w/n 30 days of the entry of this order, defts shall file a report that itemizes each of the 46 recommendations, attached to this order as Exh A, and inform how defts have implemented or will implement each and every recommendation. In addition, defts shall include a timetable for implementation of those recommendations that they have not yet implemented. That at the end of the 90−day period, defts shall file a progress report itemizing each of the 46 recommendations and the status of implementation of the recommendations. The Monitor shall confirm the status of defts' compliance w/the 46 recommendations. That w/n 60 days of the entry of this order, the pts shall file a joint modification of section 58 of the Medical plan. set Motion Filing deadline to 1/29/93 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (cm). (Entered: 12/29/1992)

4167

ORDER vacating [4086−1] order granting and adapting 188th report of Crt Monitor; order granting [3958−1] 188th report of Crt Monitor re: conveying consultants review of defts May 2, 1991. Re: vacating order of 11/12/92 and correcting footnote 1. The Crt will order defts to implement the following recommendations of the monitor's expert consultant Dr. Dennis Koson: defts shall initiate policies and procedures for discharging patients, every 6 mos the director of Correctional Mental Health shall re−evaluate the need for a long term hospital care unit, correctional officers who have completed the specialized mental health training shall be assigned to an ICU post for a minimum of 6 mos, a policy and procedure shall be written and implemented authorizing the director of a CRMHU to have a correctional officer removed from a post w/n for inappropriate behavior, non−psychiatric inmates shall not be housed in the ICU, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/29/1992)

Letter MOTION from Domingo Grajales Cardona in Spanish for Release of Funds in the amt of $500 in re sanctions imposed upon correctional officers (tendered) (np) (Entered: 12/29/1992)

4168

ORDER vacating [4163−1] order to issue a check in the amt of $1,077,595.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury of P.R. for deposit in acct #92−252−098−01−081. The Clerk has informed the Crt that only the sum of $750,000 is available. The Crt orders the Clerk to issue a check for the sum of $750,000 to the Secretary of the Treaury of P.R. for deposit in acct #92−252−098−01−081.(Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (np) Modified on 12/30/1992 (Entered: 12/30/1992)

4169 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of manuals of policies and procedures w/attchs, by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

4170 ORDER granting [4123−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $5,476.64 and expenses in the amt of $307.98 for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. The Clerk is to issue forthwith a check payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

4171 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Dec in the amt of $764.40 for atty C. Ramos Gonzalez (np) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

4172 228th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: second report regarding calculation of overcrowding submitted pursuant to the Crt's order of 10/29/92 (np) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

MANAGER'S CHECK EL CENTRAL HISPANO #403747 dtd 12/30/92 in the amt of $750,000 payable to Treasury Dept of The Commonwealth of P.R. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1993)

4173 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of December 1992 in the amt of $552.00 for atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)

4174 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time 45 days to file sixth semiannual comprehensive report required by the Medical Care Plan (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 73 of 513

01/04/1993
01/04/1993 01/04/1993 01/05/1993 01/05/1993 01/05/1993 01/05/1993 01/05/1993 01/05/1993 01/05/1993 01/05/1993 01/07/1993 01/07/1993 01/07/1993 01/07/1993 01/08/1993
01/08/1993 01/08/1993 01/08/1993

4175 MOTION SUBMITTING reimbursement in the amt of $796.25 to be deposited in the acct for the fine fund, based on the Crt's order of 10/8/92 in re: attys fees by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, by atty Pia Gallegos. Receipt #65584. (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4176 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of December 1922 in the amt of $7,464.49 for atty Pia Gallegos (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4177 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,190.00 plus expenses $16.71 for atty Harvey Nachman (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4159−1] 15th mot in compliance w/the order of 8/18/88. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4165−1] motion for Leave to File under seal exh B ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4178 226th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 154th report pursuant to the Crt's order of 7/23/87 (overcrowding) w/exhs A−D (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4179 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly evaluations of the Administation of Corrections w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4180 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time addlt 15 days to file English transl of docts attached to mot #4179 (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4181 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Amend [4153−1] order regarding conditions at State Penitentiary Complex (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4182 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expert fees in the amt of $7,727.13 for the period of Sep 1 thru Dec 21, 1992 for Steve J. Martin, Esq. (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4183 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $11,084.32 and expenses for $485.92 for the month of December 1992 for atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 01/07/1993)
4184 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: Court Monitor's time and expenses for the month of December, 1992. (el) (Entered: 01/12/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS check #403593 dtd 1/7/93 in the amt of $5,784.62 payable to Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 01/12/1993)
4185 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,182.50 for the month of December, 1992 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. (el) (Entered: 01/12/1993)
4186 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,302.56 and expenses in the amt of $24.00 for the month of December, 1992 for Atty Harr Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 01/12/1993)
4191 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of December, 1992 in the amt of $1,223.00 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. Note: (This document was originally filed 1/8/93 but inadvertently not entered on docket) (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)
4187 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expensess in the amt of $1,223.00 for the month of December, 1992 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) Modified on 04/30/1993 (Entered: 01/12/1993)
4188 ORDER granting [4184−1] itemized statement for the month of December, 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) Modified on 04/30/1993 (Entered: 01/12/1993)
4189 ORDER granting [3765−1] 189th report and adopting the findings of fact contained in it as its own. Defts' objection with respect to Recommendation 3 and 5 is grant. Defts shall procure a license, or a letter or certificate of compliance from the contractor or builder of the new dormitory. Deft shall construct a floor to ceiling

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 74 of 513

01/08/1993
01/08/1993 01/12/1993
01/12/1993 01/13/1993 01/13/1993 01/13/1993 01/14/1993 01/14/1993 01/14/1993 01/14/1993 01/14/1993 01/14/1993

wall to separate the dayroom from the sleeping area. One shower for every eight inmates shall be provided. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/12/1993)

4190

ORDER granting [4109−1] 193rd report conveying Mental Health Expert's Review of defts' Plan and adopting all the conclusion of the monitor's experts. Defts shall implement the policies and procedures attached to the report at Exhibit I which provide for vocational, interest, intelligence and educational screening, including the policy that non−mental health personnel may administer the screening. Further ordered that the Administration of Correction shall integrate the policies and procedures at Exhibit I into its Classification Manuals. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/12/1993)

4191 ORDER Confirming and granting [4178−1] 226th report and the pymt of $3,585,350.00 of fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/12/1993)

4192

ORDER granting [4061−1] 216th report and directing defts to indicate what money has been spent and what has been obligated in future expenditure reports; deft shall also certify that the padlocks have been removed and that the doors btwn sections can be opened and setting Motion Filing deadline to 5/31/93; defts are furthered ordered to file the description of the disciplinary system to be provide to inmates during the program orientation within 15 days entry of this order and that deft shall file UNDER SEAL A COPY OF A SIGNED CONSENT FORM for each inmate housed in Bldg 8 within 15 days of entry of this order.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/14/1993)

4193 ORDER granting [4145−1] 10th report of Hogar Crea, and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in the amt of $17,120.26 to Hogar Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4194 ORDER granting [4160−1] nominations of persons to serve on Special Advisory Committee and Appointing Jose Lazaro Paoli, Esq. and Ernesto Rive Mora, M.D., to join Mr. Enrique Irizarry, Jr. to serve as members of the Special Advisory Committee. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4195 ORDER, Directing the Clerk to issue a check and for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $327,595.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico for deposit to acct #92−252−098−01−081. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4196 220th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: Report on Hogar Crea's compliance with order of 1−13−92 apprvg expenditure of the fine funds for the expansion of Hogar Crea's Drug Rehabilitation Program. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4197 MOTION SUBMITTING RJAG'S Financial report for tasks 1−E, 1−F and 1−G of the AOC Rehabilitation Program by Defendant−All. (Report submitted.) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4198 MOTION SUBMITTING RJAG's Status Report of the AOC's Rehabilitation Program by Defendant−All (Report submtted) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4199 Third Accounting Report by Defendant−All re: expenditures for the DSCA expansion at Guerrero for the September−December period. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4200 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time for 15 days in which to file English translation of documents submitted in dkt. #4199 Third Acctg Report. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4201 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 2−1−93 in which to file opposition to mot. dkt. #4181. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4202 OBJECTION by Defendant−All to applications for atty fees for the month of December, 1992. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 75 of 513

01/14/1993 01/14/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993 01/15/1993
01/15/1993 01/15/1993

4203 APPLICATION by Defendant−All for Attorney Fees and expense for the period from 10−192 to 12−23−92. (Sealed enveloped attached to this application/motion for fees) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #407111 dtd 1/14/93 in the amt of $17,120.26 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4204 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for increase in compensation from $135.00 per hr to $145.00 per hr for Crt Monitor. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4205 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for increase in compensation for Administrative Assistant Daniel Werner to $24,000.00 per yr. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4206 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 2−15−93 to comply with order requiring the Dept. of Health to publish notices calling for candidates for the position of Chief Health Coordinator. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4207 56th Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates of admissions and releases for the month of December, 1992. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4208 MOTION by Defendant−All for Eileen Landron Guardiola to Withdraw as Attorney and that the Law Firm of Ramirez & Ramirez will continue representation. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4209 NOTICE OF APPEAL from the Opinion and order of 12/18/92 dkt. #4156 re the approval of Dr. Lambert King report and recommendation on medical plans. Appeal record due on 1/25/93 by Defendant−All . FILING FEE $ 105 RECEIPT # 65739 Transcript Order Form furnished to appellant. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4210 11th Report re: Program for the rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea, by Director of Program Elliot Alicea. (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4211 ORDER granting [4122−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $507.00 for Atty Ramos Gonzalez., and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in the amt of $507.00 to said atty. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4212 ORDER granting [4127−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $2,016.00 for Atty Jose Fernandez Sein., and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in said amt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4213 ORDER granting [4125−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $3,037.00 for Atty Jeffrey Williams., and directing the Clerk to Disburse funds in said amt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4214 ORDER granting [4120−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $9,555.00 and the amt of $213.33 for office expenses for Atty Pia Gallegos., and directing the Clerk to disburse Funds in the total amt of $9,768.33 to said atty. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4215

ORDER granting [4129−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $1,984.32 and expenses in the amt of $21.87 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano., and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in the total amt of $2,006.19 to said atty. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4216 ORDER granting [4130−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992 in the amt of $1,260.00 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias., and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in said amt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

4217 ORDER granting [4121−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of November, 1992., and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in the amt of $1,970.00 payable to Atty Harvey B. Nachman. signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/19/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 76 of 513

01/19/1993 01/19/1993 01/19/1993
01/19/1993
01/19/1993
01/19/1993 01/19/1993
01/19/1993
01/20/1993 01/20/1993 01/20/1993 01/22/1993 01/22/1993 01/22/1993 01/22/1993 01/25/1993
01/25/1993 01/25/1993

4218 229th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4219 227th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4220 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan directing the defts to deposit the sum of $1,000,000.00 to replenish the Fund and directing the Clerk that upon recpt of said amt to Disburse Funds for $1,,000.000.00 to the Center for the Study of Law. (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4221 ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila de Corral & Co. for services rendered in the acctg management of this case for the month of August, 1992. (Invoice no. 9117 attached) (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4222 ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila del Corral for services rendered in the acctg management of this case for the month of September, 1992. (Invoice no. 9161 attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4223 ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 for services rendered in the acctg management of this case for the month of November, 1992. (Invoice 9341 attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4224 ORDER, for pymt of custody fees and for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $100.00 to Banco Central, Corp. for the period of 9/12/91 to 9/12/92 as per invoice no. 92−132 from Banco Central Corp. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez) (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4225 ORDER Approving and granting [4218−1] 229th report of the Court Monitor and the pymt of $3,165,950.00 of fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4226 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of exhs of corrective action plans by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4227 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of exhs A and B of the Third Accounting Report re expenditures for the DSCA Expansion at Gerrero for the Sept.−Dec. period by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #407212 in the amt of $4,875.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (Payment of invoices 9117, 9161 and 9341). (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4228 MOTION SUBMITTING ck in the sum of $500,000.00 to replenish the fund and in compl/w Crt Order of 5−20−92 by Defendant−All. (Rcpt. #65806 in the amt of $500,000.00) (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4229 MOTION SUBMITTING check in the amt of $87,273.26 to reimburse the EBP's expendiutes for the month of Sept. and Oct, 1992 by Defendant−All. (Rcpt #65806) (el) Modified on 01/25/1993 (Entered: 01/25/1993)
4230 231st Report by Defendant−All re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 01/25/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S ck #408144 dtdt 2/22/93 in the amt of $11,570.24 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)
4231 ORDER Approving and granting [4219−1] 227th report of the Court Monitor and the pymt of $3,408,400.00 of fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/27/1993)
MANAGERS CHECK no. 407347 of CENTRAL HISPANO dtd 1/25/93 in the amt of $500,000.00 payable to the Center for the Study of Law. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO managers check # 407332 dtd 1/25/93 in the amt of $3,037.00 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 77 of 513

01/25/1993 01/25/1993 01/25/1993 01/25/1993 01/25/1993 01/25/1993 01/25/1993 01/25/1993 01/26/1993 01/26/1993
01/26/1993 01/27/1993
01/28/1993
01/28/1993 01/28/1993 01/28/1993 01/29/1993 01/29/1993 01/29/1993

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #407334 in the amt of $1,260.00 payable to Atty Nora Rodriguez Matias.f (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK # 407329 dtd 1/25/93 in the amt of $327,595.00 payable to Secretary of Treasury. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #407331 DTD 1/25/93 in the amt of $1,970.00 payable to Atty Harvey B. Nachman. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #407354 in the amt of $100.00 payable to Banco Central Corp for pymt of custody fees. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #407330 in the amt of $2,016.00 payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #407335 dtd 1/25/93 in the amt of $9,768.33 payable to Atty Pia Gallegos. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER CK #40733 dtd 1/25/93 in the amt of $2,006.19 payable to Atty. Harry Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #407336 in the amt of $507.00 dtd 1/25/93 payable to Carlos Ramos Gonzalez. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4204−1] motion for increase in compensation for Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/27/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4220−1] motion for defts to deposit the sum of $1,000,000.00 to replenish the Fund and directing the Clerk that upon recpt of said amt to Disburse Funds for $1,,000.000.00 to the Center for the Study of Law. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/27/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4205−1] motion for increase in compensation for Administrative Assistant Daniel Werner with the Crt Monitor's Office. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 01/27/1993)

4232 MOTION SUBMITTING under SEAL Consent Forms for each inmate housed in bldg eight at Guerrero pursuant to 1/12/93 Court's Oorder and req. extension of 30 days to file disciplinary system by Defendant−All. (Attached Sealed Envelope) (el) Modified on 04/30/1993 (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4233

MOTION SUBMITTING reports pursuant to 12/28/92 Crts Orders re clarifications of plans for the provision of acute and intermediate level mental health services for female inmates and reports infrmg how defts have implemented or will implement the 46 recommendations of Crt Moniotr's 213th Report by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4234 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 30 days in which to file English translation of Reports submitted with dkt. #4233. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4235 Informative Motion by EBP re: operating expenses for the month of December, 1992 with attachment. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4236 FORTY SIXTH Report by EBP re: financial, expenses, bail releases and costs, etc. pursuant to Crt's order of 4−28−88. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4237 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Defendant−All by Jay A. Garcia−Gregory. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4237 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 30 days to comply with all reporting and filing requirements. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4238

MOTION by Defendant−All for Marcos A. Ramirez Lavandero to Withdraw as Attorney for all those who have become defts (Hon. Pedro Rosello, Jose Jimenz, Hon. Enrique Vazquez Quintana) but will continue to represent former governor Rafael Hernandez Colon, former Administrators of Corrections, Lorenzo Villalba and Mercedes Otero de Ramos, former Secretary of Health, Jose E. Soler Zapata, Isabel Suliveres and Jose Nunez Lopez as defts in their personal and individual capacity. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 78 of 513

02/01/1993 02/01/1993 02/01/1993 02/01/1993 02/01/1993 02/02/1993 02/02/1993
02/02/1993 02/03/1993 02/03/1993 02/03/1993 02/03/1993 02/03/1993
02/04/1993 02/04/1993 02/04/1993 02/05/1993 02/05/1993 02/05/1993

4239 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $655.20 for Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for the month of January, 1993. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4240 MOTION SUBMITTING Food Service Audits and corrective action plans pursuant to Crt's order of 3−30−90 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4241 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to 30 days in which to file translation of Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4253 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $16,241.41 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 02/08/1993)

4254 ORDER approving and confirming [4230−1] 231st report of the Crt Monitor ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 02/08/1993)

4242 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order directing the Clerk to issue a check to Atty Harvey B. Nachman covering the fees earned for the month of Oct. 1992 which has not been authorized. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4243 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order authorizing atty fees for the months of June, July, August, and September of 1992 for Atty Harvey B. Nachman and Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (See response filed 10/19/92 to Court order dtd 10−8−92) (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4244 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses in the total amt of $9,325.41 for Atty Pia Gallegos for the month of Jan/93. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4245 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses in the total amt of $738.75 for Atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of Jan./93. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4246 AMENDED Fifty Sixth Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates and of admissions and releases for the month of Dec./92. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4247 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,102.50 for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias for the month of Jan/93. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4248 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time for 3 days in which to file the 1/15/93 quarterly report for expenditures. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4249

JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy), issued as informal mandate, Re: [3962−1] appeal by Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Lorenzo Villalba, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Isabel Suliveres, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juanita Gomez, Heriberto Acevedo , dismisssing the appeal pursuant to appellants motion for voluntary dismissal. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4250 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,265.12 for Atty Harry Anduze Montano for the month of Jan/93. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4251 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,504.00 for Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for the month of Jan/93. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4252 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,710.00 for Atty Harvey B. Nachman for the month of Jan/93. (el) (Entered: 02/07/1993)

4255 235th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: third report regarding calculation of overcrowding submitted pursuant to the Crt's order of 10/29/92 (np) (Entered: 02/08/1993)

4256 ITEMIZED Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses from the period of 12/31/92 thru 1/31/93 (np) (Entered: 02/08/1993)

4257 MOTION SUBMITTING disciplinary regulations applied to inmates housed in buildings 7 and 8 of Guerrero and request for ext of 30 days to file English transl

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 79 of 513

02/08/1993 02/09/1993 02/09/1993 02/10/1993
02/10/1993 02/11/1993 02/11/1993 02/11/1993
02/12/1993 02/12/1993
02/16/1993 02/16/1993 02/16/1993 02/16/1993 02/17/1993 02/17/1993
02/17/1993

w/attchs by govt defts. (np) (Entered: 02/08/1993)

4258 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly report regarding expenditures as per the environmental plan from Oct to Dec 1992 w/attch by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 02/09/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER [4258−1] miscellaneous Noted on the quarterly report for expenditures as per the environmental plan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4259 ORDER granting [4256−1] itemized statement of the Crt Monitor in the amt of $139,677.15. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4260 ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila de Corral & Co. for services rendered in the acctg management of this case for the month of December, 1992 with invoice no. 9420 attached. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4261 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 2/16/93 in which to file the 57 Report re crowding. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4262 JOINT MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to 4−2−93 to file any response to any pdg Crt Monitor Report and to respond to any motions filed by either party by 3/17/93. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4263 JOINT MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano for transfer and Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,000,000.00 from the fine fund to the EBP. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4319 JOINT MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano for order that the sum of $227,757.00 be Disbursed and transferred from the fine fund to the acct of the Ponce Pilot project for the purchase of recreation equipment and construction of recreation facilities. (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

4264 Twelfth Report re: Program for the rehabilitation of Drug Users under Hogar Crea, by Director Elliot Alicea. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4265 JOINT MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano for transfer from the fine fund to the Ponce pilot project's special acct and Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $507,259.00 for initial repairs and improvements, equipment, and weapons at the Ponce Pilot Project. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4266 MOTION SUBMITTING report of acctg of expenditures of fine monies and deposits for the months of December, 1992 and January, 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4267 236th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding from 11/13/92 to 11/26/92. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4268 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Amend [4251−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,504.00 for Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for the month of Jan/93 to reflect the amt of $1,216.00 as total of fees requested. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4269 Fifty Seventh Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates and of admissions and releases for the month of Jan/93. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4270 237th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding covering 11/27/92 thru 12/10/92. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4271 APPLICATION and RECOMMENDATION by Vincent M. Nathan and Enrique Irizarry, Jr., Chairman of Special Advisory Committee to request order authorizing the expenditure of fine money to continue the existing program that Hogar Crea, Inc. operates at five designated AOC facilities. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4272

Subtitute and/or Supplemental MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Stay proceedings referring to: [4262−1] joint motion to Extend Time to 4−2−93 to file any response to any pdg Crt Monitor Report and to respond to any motions filed by either party by 3/17/93. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 80 of 513

02/18/1993 02/18/1993 02/18/1993 02/18/1993 02/18/1993 02/18/1993
02/18/1993 02/18/1993
02/19/1993
02/19/1993
02/19/1993
02/19/1993
02/22/1993 02/22/1993 02/22/1993 02/22/1993 02/23/1993

4273 MOTION SUBMITTING first 60−days compliance progress report for the State Penitentiary Complex by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4274 MOTION SUBMITTING Hospital Care Unit Evaluation in compl/w Crt Order of 12/28/92 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4275 Amended Fifty Seventh Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates and of admissions and releases for the month of Jan. 1993. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4276 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy), issued as informal mandate, Re: [4209−1] appeal by Defendant−All , dismissing the appeal upon consideration of appellant's mot/voluntary dismissal. (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

Record on Appeal returned from U.S. Court of Appeals: [4209−1] appeal (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4277

ORDER granting in part, [4265−1] joint motion for transfer from the fine fund to the Ponce pilot project's special acct for purchase of recreation equipment and construction of recreation facilities and directing the Clerk to issue a check for the Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $227,757.00 to the Secretary of the Treasury for deposit to acct no. 92−252−098−01−081. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4278 MOTION SUBMITTING Sixth Comprehensive Semi−Annual Progress Report toward compliance with the medical care plan and mental health Plan by Defendant−All. (Three volumes submitted) (el) (Entered: 02/21/1993)

4279

ORDER supplementing order dkt. #4167 grntg the 188th Report and directing the defts to implement the crt monitors recommendations. Defts shall within 30 days of the entry of this order revise the feasibility study of a chronic long term case unit and the Final Housing Plan contained in their May 2nd motion in accordance with the recommendation of Dr. Koson. Defts shall include in the revised housisng plan a stmt, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4280

ORDER granting [4265−1] joint motion for transfer from the fine fund to the Ponce pilot project's special acct and directing the Clerk to issue a check and Disburse Funds in the amt of $507,259.00 to Secretary of the Treasury for deposit in acct no. 92−252−098−01−081. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4281 ORDER granting [4183−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $11,084.32 and expenses for $485.92 for the month of December 1992 for atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez and directing the Clerk to issue a check from fine fund in the total of $11,5770.24. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4282 ORDER granting Joint motion for stay of proceedings [4262−1] joint motion to Extend Time to 4−2−93 to file any response to any pdg Crt Monitor Report and to respond to any motions filed by either party by 3/17/93. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4283 ORDER granting [4263−1] joint motion for transfer and Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $1,000,000.00 from the fine fund to the EBP and directing the Clerk to issue a ck from the fine monies in said amt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S ck #408148 dtd 2/22/93 in the amt of $1,000,000.00 payable to EBP. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS CK #408147 dtd 2−22−93 in the amt of $75,000.00 payable to EBP. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S ck #408145 dtd 2/22/93 in the amt of $1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS ck #408146 dtd 2/22/93 in the amt of $507,259.00 payable to Secretary of the Treasury, PR. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4284 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan to establish period for severance payments for Kenneth Faiver with memo in support. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 81 of 513

02/24/1993
02/25/1993 02/25/1993 02/25/1993 02/25/1993 02/25/1993 02/26/1993 02/26/1993 02/26/1993 02/26/1993
03/01/1993 03/01/1993 03/01/1993
03/01/1993
03/02/1993 03/02/1993
03/02/1993 03/03/1993

4285 ORDER Confirming and granting [4267−1] 236th report by the Crt Monitor and the pymt of $3,258,850.00 of fines is suspended pursuant to the Stipulation re population management and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4286 Informative Motion by EBP re: itemized list of expenses for the month of January, 1993 in the amt of $41,456.84. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4287 MOTION SUBMITTING check for $1,000.000.00 to replenish the funds and in compl/w Crt order of 1/25/93 by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

Rcpt no. 66210 in the amt of $1,000,000.00 by deft. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4288 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of docu. attached to Motion enclosing reports (dkt. 4233) by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4289 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order to grnt Atty Gallegos' applications for atty fees for the months of Sept., Oct. and Dec. of 1992 and Jan. of 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4290 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in agrmt to [4284−1] motion to establish period for severance payments for Kenneth Faiver by Vincent M. Nathan (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4291 47th Financial Report by EBP. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4292 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time of 4 days in which to compl w/Crt's order of 12−28−92 apprvg the 213th Report of Crt Monitors. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4293

ORDER granting [4182−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expert fees in the amt of $7,727.13 for the period of Sep 1 thru Dec 21, 1992 for Steve J. Martin, Esq. Directing the Crt Monitor to transmit pymt in the amt of $7,727.13 to Steve J. Martin from the fine funds transferred to the monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4294 MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time until 3−19−93 to file any papers with respect to Sections 57 and 58 of the Medical Plan. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4295 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time unitl 5/15/93 to develop and file the table of organization for the delivery of medical and mental health care. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4296 ORDER, for Disbursement of Funds for pymt of services to Vila Del Corral & Co. for the acctg management in the amt of $1,625.00 for the month of Jan. 1993. Invoice no. 9542 attached. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4297 ORDER Confirming and granting [4270−1] 237th report of the Crt Monitor and the pymt of $2,990,300.00 of fines is hereby suspended pursuant to Stipulation regarding population and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4298 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $6,337.76 and expenses for $51.61 for the month of Feb. 1993 (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4299 ORDER granting [4271−1] motion to request order authorizing the expenditure of fine money to continue the existing program that Hogar Crea, Inc. operates at five designated AOC facilities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL MANAGERS ck #408395 dtd 3−2−93 in the amt of $1,000,000.00 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Law. (el) (Entered: 03/03/1993)

4300 NOTICE of filing of summary of time charges for the month of February, 1993 by Atty Ferandez Sein. (el) (Entered: 03/05/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 82 of 513

03/03/1993 03/03/1993 03/04/1993 03/04/1993 03/04/1993 03/05/1993
03/05/1993 03/05/1993 03/05/1993 03/05/1993
03/08/1993 03/08/1993 03/08/1993 03/09/1993 03/10/1993 03/11/1993 03/11/1993 03/11/1993

4301 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,720.00 for the month of February, 1993 for Atty Fernandez Sein. (el) (Entered: 03/05/1993)
4302 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,084.16 for the month of February, 1993 for Atty Anduze Montano. (el) (Entered: 03/05/1993)
4303 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $922.50 payable to Atty Nora Rodriguez for the month of February, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4304 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $6,868.24 payable to Atty Pia Gallegos for the month of February, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4305 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 3−15−93 in which to file the AOC's portion of the report in relation to the Crt's order of 12−28−92 regarding the 213th Report by the Crt Monitor. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4306 ORDER granting [4298−1] motion for Attorney Fees for Atty Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $6,337.76 and expenses for $51.61 for the month of Feb. 1993, and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds and pay atty Garcia the sum of $6,337.76. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4307 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $655.20 payable to Atty Carlos Ramos Gonzalez for the month of February, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4308 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $693.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of February, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4309 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for expenses in the amt of $42.25 payable to Atty Nachman for the month of February, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4313 ORDER granting [4284−1] motion to establish period for severance payments for Kenneth Faiver and that his current contract with the Dept of Health will not be renewed beyond 6/30/93, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
4310 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses for the period of 2−1−93 through 2−28−93. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4311 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for expedited Hearing re emergency relief (custodial staffing) at the Rio Piedras Complex. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4312 238th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 03/09/1993)
4314 ORDER granting [4264−1] Twelfth report, and for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $18,028.55 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
4315 58th Report by Defendant−All re: population of inmates and of admisions and releases for the month of February, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
4316 ORDER granting [4310−1] itemized statement and approving the amt of $114,130.95 for expenditures for the month of February, 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
4317 MOTION SUBMITTING a copy of the Executive Order by the Hon. Pedro Rosello, Governor, naming Hon. Baltasar Corrada del Rio as his personal representative in this case by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)
4318 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 4/2/93 in which to respond to motion for emergency relief − custodial staffing, dkt. 4311. (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 83 of 513

03/11/1993 03/11/1993 03/12/1993 03/12/1993 03/15/1993 03/15/1993 03/15/1993 03/16/1993 03/16/1993 03/19/1993 03/19/1993
03/21/1993 03/22/1993

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S ck. #408713 dtd 3/11/93 payable to Hogar Crea. (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

Certified and transmitted Record on Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: [3962−1] appeal by Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Lorenzo Villalba, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Isabel Suliveres, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juanita Gomez, Heriberto Acevedo (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

4320 MOTION by Defendant−All to request order for the permanent discharge of fines calculated at $54,154.150.00 for the six months period btwn 6−1−93 and 11−30−93. Response due 3/25/93 . (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

4321 MOTION SUBMITTING ck in the amt of $21,786.21 (rcpt #66423) for the November operating expenses of the EBP by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

4322 ORDER granting [4312−1] 238th report by Crt Monitor and that the pymt of $2,875,250.00 of fines is hereby suspended pursuant to Stipulation regarding population and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

4323 1st Report re: Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea pursuant to Crt Order of 3/1/93, by Director Alicea. (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

4324 MOTION SUBMITTING AOC's Report pursuant to Crt Order of 12/28/92 and itemizing the recommendations pertinent to the Administration of Correction and informing how defts have implemented or will implement the pertinent recommendation by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/16/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #408854 dtd 3/16/93 in the amt of $6,389.37 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (el) (Entered: 03/17/1993)

4325 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of the Executive Order by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/17/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S ck. #408958 dtd 3/19/93 in the amt of $227,757.00 payable to Secretary of the Treasury of P.R. (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4326

ORDER granting [3987−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses for Atty Pia Gallegos for the month of September, 1992 in the total amt of $11,067.51., granting [4073−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses in the amt of $10,694.59 for the month of October, 1992 for Atty Pia Gallegos., granting [4176−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of December 1922 in the amt of $7,464.49 for atty Pia Gallegos, granting [4244−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses in the total amt of $9,325.41 for Atty Pia Gallegos for the month of Jan/93., granting [4304−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $6,868.24 payable to Atty Pia Gallegos for the month of February, 1993., granting [3985−1] motion for Attorney Fees of Atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of September, 1992 in the amt of $4,056.75., granting [4081−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of October, 1992 in the amt of $6,341.85 for Atty Jeffrey Williams., granting [4191−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of December, 1992 in the amt of $1,223.00 for Atty Jeffrey Williams., granting [4245−1] motion for Attorney Fees and expenses in the total amt of $738.75 for Atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of Jan./93., granting [4308−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $693.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of February, 1993., and for Disbursement of Funds in the total amt of $45,420.24 for Atty Pia Gallegos and the total amt of $13,054.10 for Atty Jeffrey Williams. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4497 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Pia Gallegos to Withdraw as Attorney (np) (Entered: 06/23/1993)

4327 MOTION SUBMITTING report informing how defts are implementing and will continue to implement recommendation number 41 by Defendant−All. (Attachment) (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 84 of 513

03/22/1993 03/23/1993 03/23/1993 03/24/1993 03/24/1993 03/26/1993 03/26/1993 03/26/1993 03/26/1993 03/26/1993 03/26/1993 03/29/1993 03/29/1993 03/30/1993
03/30/1993
03/30/1993
03/30/1993 03/30/1993

4328 MOTION SUBMITTING modification of Section 58 of the Medical Plan and in compliance with Crt Order of 12/28/92 by Defendant−All (Attachment) (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4329 MOTION SUBMITTING accounting of expenditures of fine monies for February, 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan. (Attachments) (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4330 239th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: Fourth Report regarding calculation of overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4331 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and pymt in the amt of $21,812.50 to Atty Luis M. Villaronga who has been acting of−counsel in this case. (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4332 URGENT MOTION by Defendant−All for Release of Funds in the amt of $554,058. payable to Dept. of Anti−Addiction Services to cover the expenses for the DSCA project from Jan. to April 30, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4333 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [4233−1] miscellaneous Defts' Plan for the provision of Mental Health Services for female inmates by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4334 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Hearing referring to: [4311−1] motion for expedited Hearing re emergency relief (custodial staffing) at the Rio Piedras Complex. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4335 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for order to Show Cause why defts should not be hld in contempt for failure to comply with Order dkt. #4166 of 12−28−93. (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4336 Informative Motion by EBP re: monthly operating expenses for the month of February, 1993 in the amt of $34,396.70. (Attachments of invoices) (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

4337 48TH Report by EBP re: expenses for the month of February, 1993 were $34,396.70. (el) (Entered: 03/29/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK. # 409020 dtd 3/26/93 in the amt of $13,054.10 payable to Jeffrey Williams and ck # 409019 dtd 3/26/93 payable to Pia Gallegos. (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)

4338 Second Amended Fifty−Seventh Report by Defendant−All re: admission and releases of inmates for the month of January, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/30/1993)

4339 Amended Fifty−Eighth Report by Defendant−All re: admissions and releases of inmates for the month of February, 1993. (el) (Entered: 03/30/1993)

4340 ORDER, for pymt of services to Vila del Corral & Co. for acctg management and the Clerk is to Disburse Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila del Corral. (Invoice No. 9542 covering the month of January, 1993 attached) signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/31/1993)

4341 ORDER, for pymt of services for acctg management for the month of February, 1993 and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila de Corral. (Invoice No.9574 attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/31/1993)

4342

ORDER granting and confirming the [4164−1] 224th report of the Court Monitor and that the findings of fact contained in the report including the conclusions of the monitor's experts are adopted as findings of the court. Defts shall implement the recommendations contained in section IV of the consultants' report within the time specified in the report, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 03/31/1993)

4343 MOTION by Defendant−All to Amend paragraph 58 of the Medical Plan as indicated herein at paragraph 10. (el) (Entered: 03/31/1993)

4344 MOTION SUBMITTING Fire Safety Audits and corrective action plans pursuant to 3/30/88 Order and request for extension to file English translation by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/31/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 85 of 513

03/30/1993 03/31/1993 03/31/1993 04/01/1993
04/01/1993 04/01/1993 04/01/1993 04/02/1993
04/02/1993 04/02/1993
04/02/1993 04/05/1993 04/05/1993 04/05/1993 04/06/1993 04/06/1993 04/06/1993 04/06/1993 04/06/1993

4345 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly sanitation and maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans pursuant to 3/30/90 Order and req. for extension in which to file English translation by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 03/31/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS ck#420892 dtd 3/31/93 in the amt of $1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Corral. (el) (Entered: 04/07/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS ck #420893 in the amt of $1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral. (el) (Entered: 04/07/1993)
4346 ORDER granting [4323−1] first report for the rehabilitation of Drug Users Under Hogar Crea, and directing the Clerk to issue a ck for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $18,622.80 to Hogares Crea. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/02/1993)
4347 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez in the amt of $1,021.20 for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/02/1993)
4348 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses for Atty Pia Gallegos in the amt of $10,520.57 for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/02/1993)
4349 240th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding. (el) (Entered: 04/02/1993)
4350 ORDER granting and confirming the [4349−1] 240th report by the Crt Monitor and that the pymt of $1,777,150.00 of fines is hereby suspended pursuant to Stipulation regarding population and a Pilot Project at Ponce. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)
4351 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees and expenses for Atty Harvey Nachman for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)
4352 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [4332−1] motion for Release of Funds in the amt of $554,058. payable to Dept. of Anti−Addiction Services to cover the expenses for the DSCA project from Jan. to April 30, 1993. by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)
4356 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Fernandez Sein for the month of March, 1993 in the total amt of $2,272.00. (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)
4353 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of Fire Safety Audit Corrective Action Plans by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)
4354 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $14,609.92 plus expenses in the amt of $451.94 for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)
4355 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [4311−1] motion for expedited Hearing re emergency relief (custodial staffing) at the Rio Piedras Complex. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 04/06/1993)
4357 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Jeffrey Williams in the amt of $560.75 for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/07/1993)
4358 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for the appointment of Gerardo J. Rivera Fourquet, Esq. to serve as Executive Director of the EBP. (el) (Entered: 04/07/1993)
4359 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Harry Anduze Montano in the amt of $1,260.48 and expenses in the amt of $29.58 for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/07/1993)
CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CK #421029 dtd 4/6/93 in the amt of $18,622.80 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)
4362 ORDER granting [4358−1] motion for the appointment of Gerardo J. Rivera Fourquet, Esq. to serve as Executive Director of the EBP. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 86 of 513

04/07/1993
04/07/1993
04/08/1993 04/08/1993
04/08/1993 04/12/1993 04/12/1993 04/12/1993 04/12/1993 04/13/1993 04/14/1993
04/14/1993 04/14/1993 04/15/1993 04/15/1993
04/16/1993 04/16/1993 04/16/1993
04/21/1993
04/21/1993

4360 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias in the amt of $810.00 for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/08/1993)

4361 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for Atty Luis M. Villaronga in the amt of $1,562.50 for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/08/1993)

4363 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time in which to file opposition to motion for OSC. (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4364 ORDER, Appointing Yvette Colon as interim director of EBP until such time as the person confirmed by the crt assumes full time responsibilities as the EBP Director. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4365 222nd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: Selected Environmental conditions as assessed by the Crt's consultants in Sept. 1992. (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4366 59th Report by Defendant−All re: population and ofadmissions and releases of inmates for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4367 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses for the period of 3/1/93 through 3/31/93. (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4368 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for Nomination and req. for Appointment of Assistant Crt. Monitors and Project Coordinator. (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4369 242nd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: calculation of overcrowding submitted. (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4370 244th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: overcrowding (el) (Entered: 04/16/1993)

4371 MOTION SUBMITTING ck in the amt of $45,916.43 (rcpt #66832) for EBP's operating expenses for the month of December by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 04/19/1993)

4372 Amended 59th Report by Defendant−All re: inmates' population and of admissions and releases for the month of March, 1993. (el) (Entered: 04/19/1993)

4373 ORDER granting [4367−1] itemized statement for the month of March, 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/19/1993)

4374 STIPULATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All to dispose of DSCA Controversy (Appendix B ofthe 12/30/91 Stipulation). (el) (Entered: 04/19/1993)

4375 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time in which to file second 60−day compliance progress report for the State Penitentiary complex. (el) Modified on 04/30/1993 (Entered: 04/19/1993)

4376 MOTION SUBMITTING second 60−day compliance progress report for the State Penitentiary Complex by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 04/19/1993)

4377 Second Report re: Program forthe rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. (el) (Entered: 04/19/1993)

4378

ORDER granting [4354−1] motion for Attorney Fees for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $14,609.92 plus expenses in the amt of $451.94 for the month of March, 1993. Clerk is directed to issue forthwith a ck for the total amt of $15,061.86 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/19/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO ck. #421757 dtd 4/21/93 in the amt of $15,061.86 payable to Carlos V. Gutierrez, Esq. (el) Modified on 04/26/1993 (Entered: 04/26/1993)

4379

ORDER granting and approving the [4374−1] stipulation to dispose of DSCA funding controversy and directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in the amt of $435,425.96 to the Secretary of DSCA. The Court Monitor shall employ an independent acctg firm in P.R. to conduct a thorough audit of all moneys disbursed to the Commonwealth Treasury for the use of DSCA. ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 87 of 513

04/21/1993
04/27/1993 04/28/1993 04/29/1993 04/29/1993 04/29/1993 04/29/1993 04/30/1993 04/30/1993 04/30/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993

Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/26/1993)

4380

ORDER, Motion Hearing set for 9:00 6/7/93 for [4311−1] motion for expedited Hearing re emergency relief (custodial staffing) at the Rio Piedras Complex., [4181−1] motion to Amend [4153−1] order regarding conditions at State Penitentiary Complex, 4335−1] motion for order to Show Cause why defts should not be hld in contempt for failure to comply with Order dkt. #4166 of 12−28−93., [3922−1] motion req. permanent discharge of fines for the six month period btwn Nov./1991 and May/92, [4320−1] motion to request order for the permanent discharge of fines, dkt. 3746 pltf's motion for a hrg to establish the extent of defts' failure to provide policy and procedure manuals, dkt. #4333 pltfs' opposition to defts' plan for the provision of Mental Health Services for Female Inmates. It is further ordered that defts have until 5−3−93 in which to respond to the stated herein motions; pltfs shall file a motion no later than 4−27−93 setting forth the specific relief, if any they are seeking in connection with their motion for OSC why defts should not be held in contempt, etc.; the Crt Monitor shall cease calculating fines resulting from overcrowding. Any fines that have been calculated by the Crt Monitor and assessed but suspended by the Crt, following 1−2−93 are permanently discharged; pltfs shall be grntd to 4−3−93 to file any opposition they may have to defts' Motion req. Permanent Discharge of Fines. All discvy for the 6−7−93 hrg shall be completed by 5−28−93. No later than 6−1−93 the parties shall file a joint motion informing the crt of any matter addressed in this order that has been resolved and identifying the issues with respect to which the parties remain in dispute. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/26/1993)

4381 MOTION SUBMITTING remedy for violation of 12−28−92 order and in compliance with Order dkt. #4380 by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (el) (Entered: 04/28/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #426090 dtd 4/28/93 in the amt of $75,000.00 payable to EBP. (el) (Entered: 04/30/1993)

4382 MOTION SUBMITTING Fourth Quarterly Acctg Report regarding Ponce Pilot Project by Defendant−All (el) (Entered: 04/30/1993)

4383 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for contempt for violations of Crt Orders on the construction of a psychiatric hospital. (el) (Entered: 04/30/1993)

4384 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 5−13−93 in which to file English translation of documents attached to Fourth quarterly Acctg Report. (el) (Entered: 04/30/1993)

4385 ORDER, Directing the Clerk to Disburse Funds in the amt of $2,125.00 to Vila de Corral & Co. for services rendered in the acctg management for the month of March, 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (el) (Entered: 04/30/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #426152 dtd 4/30/93 in the amt of $435,425.96 payable to Secretary of DSCA (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)

4386 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly report re expenditures as per the environmental plan from Jan to Mar 1993 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)

4387 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)

4388 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for atty J. Fernandez in the amt of $1,800 for the month of April 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)

4389 NOTICE of filing of summary of time charges for the month of April 1993 by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)

4390 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [4320−1] motion to request order for the permanent discharge of fines by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)

4391 RESPONSE w/attchs by Defendant−All in opposition to [4335−1] motion for order to Show Cause why defts should not be hld in contempt for failure to comply with

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 88 of 513

05/03/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993 05/03/1993
05/04/1993 05/04/1993 05/04/1993 05/05/1993 05/05/1993 05/05/1993 05/05/1993 05/05/1993 05/06/1993 05/06/1993 05/06/1993 05/06/1993

Order dkt. #4166 of 12−28−93. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4392 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [4333−1] opposition response plan for the provision of mental health services for female inmates by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4393 Motion by Defendant−All re: 159th report of the Crt Monitor (assessment of policy and procedure manuals fld 7/19/88. (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4394 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to plffs' mot to amend order regarding conditions at State Penitentiary complex. (order #4153 dtd 12/18/92) (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4395 MOTION in compliance with order dtd 12/28/93 re: progress report itemizing each of the 46 and status of implementation of the recommendations by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4396 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for atty Pia Gallegos in the amt of $6,384 and expenses in the amt of $185.57 for the month of April 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4397 NOTICE of filing of time charges and expense summary for the month of Apr 1993 by atty H. Nachman w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4398 ORDER granting [4377−1] second report re: program for the rehabilitation of Drug Users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $35,278.75 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/04/1993)
4399 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,937.50 of atty Luis M. Villaronga for the month of April 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/05/1993)
4400 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time of 30 days to comply w/order confirming the 224th report of the Crt Monitor (np) (Entered: 05/05/1993)
4401 NOTICE of by Carlos Morales−Feliciano re: taking of depo of the Adm of Corrections (np) (Entered: 05/05/1993)
4402 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,146.60 for atty Carlos E. Ramos for the month of Apr 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/06/1993)
4403 NOTICE of filing atty's time and expenses reports for Apr 1993 by atty J. Williams in the amt of $356.25 by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 05/06/1993)
4404 49th report by EBP re: expenses for the month of Mar 1993 were $558,200.00. (np) (Entered: 05/06/1993)
4405 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice of expenses for the month of Mar 1993. (np) (Entered: 05/06/1993)
4406 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to hold defts in contempt , and to impose Sanctions in re: failure to comply w/the stip of 9/6/86 and 12/30/91 (np) (Entered: 05/06/1993)
4407 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of quarterly sanitation and maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans w/attchs of by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/07/1993)
4408 MOTION SUBMITTING accounting expenditures of fine monies for the month of Mar 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 05/07/1993)
4409 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,560 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez for the month of Apr 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/07/1993)
4410 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,853.28 and expenses in the amt of $20 of atty Harry Anduze for the month of Apr

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 89 of 513

05/06/1993 05/06/1993 05/06/1993 05/06/1993 05/06/1993 05/07/1993 05/07/1993
05/10/1993 05/10/1993 05/10/1993 05/10/1993 05/11/1993
05/11/1993 05/11/1993
05/11/1993 05/11/1993

1993 (np) (Entered: 05/07/1993)

4411 NOTICE of service of notice of depo to the Pres of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth of PR by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 05/07/1993)

4412 ORDER that the Clerk issue forthwith a check in the amt of $4,780.80 for atty's fees incurred during the months of Sep, Oct, Dec 1992 and Jan, Feb, Mar of 1993 of atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) Modified on 05/12/1993 (Entered: 05/11/1993)

4413 COPY OF ORDER Consolidating Case 93−1435 w/79−4 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/11/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #426287 in the amt of $35,278.75 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 05/14/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS CK #426288 in the amot of $2,125.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 05/14/1993)

4414 ORDER OF USCA (certified copy), issued as informal mandate Re: dism the appeal. Each party shall bear its own costs s/cs to Judge Perez, Clerk, Appeals' Clerk (np) (Entered: 05/11/1993)

4415

RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [4354−1] motion for Attorney Fees for Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $14,609.92 plus expenses in the amt of $451.94 for the month of March, 1993. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [4360−1] motion for Attorney Fees for Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias in the amt of $810.00 for the month of March, 1993. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 05/11/1993)

4416 MOTION SUBMITTING reports by RJA Group in re: facilities rehabilitation plan w/final rpt task 1−A selection of institutions, final rpt for task 1−B, 1−C, and 1−D inventory of construction docts, inventory of inspection rpts, audit of institutions, appendix B part I, appendix B part II. by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/11/1993)

4417 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $9,967.36 and expenses in the amt of $389.90 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for the month of Apr 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/11/1993)

4418 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 5/14/93 to submit the 60th rpt pursuant to 4/28/93 crt order (np) (Entered: 05/11/1993)

4419 ORDER granting [4368−1] motion for Nomination and req. for Appointment of Assistant Crt. Monitors and Project Coordinator. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/13/1993)

4420

APPLICATION by EBP for modification of the 9/1/92 order for increase in the allocation of funds for the operating expenses of the expedited bail project in the amt of $105,268.68 effective 7/1/93 and the Clerk to issue checks during the week of 5/14/93 in the amt of $30,268.68 and $7,630 to cover the addlt operating expenses for the period of May and June of 1993 w/memo & attchs (np) (Entered: 05/13/1993)

4421 60th Report pursuant to the order of 4/28/88 by Defendant−All re: report of population and of admissions and releases, expanded furlough program, expansion of halfway house facilities. (np) (Entered: 05/13/1993)

4422

FIRST Report re: external education university system (SEDUE( pursuant to Crt's order of 10/5/92. The tuiton cost for the academic year 1992−93 was $29,431. The Federal Pell Grant covered $8,379; the current balance is $21,052; and the same will be covered by funds from the Morales Feliciano litigation. (np) Modified on 05/13/1993 (Entered: 05/13/1993)

4423 245th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 163rd report of overcrowding w/exh D during the period of 1/15/93 thru 1/28/93. (np) Modified on 05/13/1993 (Entered: 05/13/1993)

4424 246th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 164th report of overcrowding w/exh D during the period of 1/29/93 thru 2/11/93. (np) Modified on 05/13/1993 (Entered: 05/13/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 90 of 513

05/12/1993 05/12/1993 05/12/1993
05/13/1993 05/13/1993 05/13/1993 05/13/1993 05/13/1993 05/14/1993 05/14/1993 05/17/1993 05/17/1993 05/17/1993 05/17/1993
05/17/1993 05/17/1993 05/17/1993 05/17/1993 05/18/1993 05/18/1993

4425 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Appointment of Counsel Jose E. Fernandez Sein as trial counsel (np) Modified on 05/13/1993 (Entered: 05/13/1993)
4426 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for expert Fees of Steve J. Martin in the amt of $14,542.28 for the period of Dec 29, 1993 thru Mar 31, 1993 w/itemized list of hours and expenses (np) Modified on 05/13/1993 (Entered: 05/13/1993)
4427 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Withdraw [4406−1] motion to hold defts in contempt by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [4406−2] motion to impose Sanctions in re: failure to comply w/the stip of 9/6/86 and 12/30/91 by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) Modified on 05/13/1993 (Entered: 05/13/1993)
4428 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to oppose mot #4406 (np) (Entered: 05/14/1993)
4429 NOTICE of cancellation of depo and subpoena duces tecum of Jim Mates by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/14/1993)
4430 MOTION SUBMITTING nomination of Vila del Corral & Co to perform fiscal and program audit of expanded DSCA program by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 05/14/1993)
4431 THIRD Report re: program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. pursuant to Crt's order of 3/1/93 (np) (Entered: 05/14/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO CK #426442 in the amt of $4,780.80 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)
4432 LETTER/MOTION from inmates req emergency Hearing in re: conditions at the State Prison (np) (Entered: 05/17/1993)
4433 ORDER granting [4430−1] mot submitting nomination of Vila del Corral & Co. to perform fiscal and program audit of expanded DSCA program by Vincent Nathan ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/17/1993)
4434 Itemized Statement by Vincent M. Nathan re: time and expenses for the period of Apr 1, 1993 thru Apr 30, 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/17/1993)
4435 247th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 6th report re calculation of overcrowding for the period of Dec 25, 1992 thru Jan 21, 1993 (np) (Entered: 05/17/1993)
4436 ORDER granting [4434−1] itemized statement of time and expenses in the amt of $114,573.03 for the period of Apr 1, 1993 thru Apr 30, 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/18/1993)
4437 ORDER granting [4417−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $9,967.36 and expenses in the amt of $389.90 for a total of $10,357.26 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for the month of Apr 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/18/1993)
4438 JOINT APPLICATION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano for expedited transfer of Funds for the Ponce Pilot project w/exh A. (np) (Entered: 05/18/1993)
4439 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time for 30 days to file English translation of the itemized operational costs rpt (np) (Entered: 05/18/1993)
4440 AMENDED 60th Report by Defendant−All fld on 5/11/93 re: rpt of population and of admissions and releases, expanded furlough program and expansion of halfway house facilities (np) (Entered: 05/18/1993)
4441 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: progress report of status of the implementation of recommendations 31 and 46. (np) (Entered: 05/18/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4428−1] motion to Extend Time to oppose mot #4406 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)
4442 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees of the months of Jun, Jul, Aug, Sep, Oct and Dec 1992 or for 1993 of attys Jose E. Fernandez Sein and Harvey B. Nachman w/ copy of stmts (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 91 of 513

05/18/1993 05/18/1993 05/19/1993 05/19/1993 05/19/1993 05/19/1993 05/19/1993
05/19/1993 05/19/1993
05/19/1993 05/20/1993 05/20/1993
05/20/1993 05/24/1993 05/24/1993 05/24/1993 05/24/1993 05/24/1993 05/24/1993

Record on Appeal returned from U.S. Court of Appeals: [3962−1] appeal (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

4443 Letter MOTION from Pablo E. Garcia Vega in Spanish in re: complaining about imprisonment conditions (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER [4429−1] notice of cancellation of depo and subpoena duces tecum. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER [4441−1] motion information re: progress report. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER [4438−1] motion for expedited transfer of Funds for the Ponce Pilot project Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER [4421−1] 60th report. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4426−1] motion for expert Fees of Steve J. Martin in the amt of $14,542.28 for the period of Dec 29, 1993 thru Mar 31, 1993 w/itemized list of hours and expenses ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

4444 ORDER for investment of transactions with Paine Webber, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

4445 ORDER to transfer funds to the Ponce Pilot Project the amt of $800,000 from the fine fund to the special act #93−252−098−01−081 at the Commonwealth of PR Treasury account ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

4446 Informative Motion by Carlos Morales−Feliciano re: opposition to notice of cancellation of depo and subpoena duces tecum #4429. (np) (Entered: 05/20/1993)

4447 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of the itemized operational costs report of dkt #4438 and 4439 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 05/24/1993)

4448

ORDER granting [4420−1] motion for modification of the 9/1/92 order for increase in the allocation of funds for the operating expenses of the expedited bail project in the amt of $105,268.68 effective 7/1/93 and the Clerk to issue checks during the week of 5/14/93 in the amt of $30,268.68 and $7,630 to cover the addlt operating expenses for the period of May and June of 1993 w/memo & attchs. The Clerk is to issue a check in the amt of $37,898.68 to the EBP. That the EBP's budget for operating expenses shall be increased to $105,268.68 for each two month period. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/24/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO in the amt of $10,357.26 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 05/24/1993)

4449 MOTION leave to file under seal for Harvey B. Nachman to Withdraw as Attorney (np) (Entered: 05/24/1993)

4450 SEALED DOCUMENT re: mot to w/d legal representation by H. Nachman. (np) (li). (Entered: 05/24/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CK #426774 in the amt of $800,000 payable to Ponce Pilot Project special acct #93−252−098−01−081 (np) (Entered: 05/25/1993)

4451 Informative Motion by EBP re: itemized list of expenses for the month of April 1993 in the amt of $31,230.21. (np) Modified on 05/25/1993 (Entered: 05/25/1993)

4452 50th financial Report by EBP re: expenses for the month of April 1993. (np) (Entered: 05/25/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO CK #426775 in the amt of $37,898.68 payable to Expedited Bail Project (np) (Entered: 05/26/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 92 of 513

05/25/1993
05/25/1993 05/25/1993 05/25/1993 05/26/1993 05/27/1993 05/28/1993 06/01/1993 06/01/1993 06/01/1993 06/02/1993 06/02/1993 06/02/1993 06/02/1993 06/02/1993 06/02/1993 06/02/1993 06/03/1993 06/03/1993

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4449−1] motion leave to file under seal for Harvey B. Nachman to Withdraw as Attorney (Terminated attorney Harvey B. Nachman for Carlos Morales−Feliciano ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/26/1993)
4453 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees of counsel H. Nachman for the month of May 1 thru May 15, 1993 in the amt of $5,470 (np) (Entered: 05/26/1993)
4454 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: relocation of inmates to stateside facilities w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 05/26/1993)
4455 Minute entry: parties discussed the present status of the negotiations of matters set for hrg on Jun 7, 1993 ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/27/1993)
4456 FOURTH accounting Report by Defendant−All re: expenditures for the DSCA expansion at Guerrero for the period of Jan − Apr 1993 w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 05/27/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4454−1] motion information re: relocation of inmates. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/01/1993)
4457 JOINT Informative Motion by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano re: the pts have resolved all matters addressed by the Crt. (np) (Entered: 06/01/1993)
4458 MOTION SUBMITTING DOH's report pursuant to 3/29/93 crt's order re: progress toward the implementation of recommendations 1 thru 11 of the Crt Monitor's 224th rpt by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4459 MOTION SUBMITTING AOC's report pursuant to 3/29/93 crt's order re: progress toward the implementation of recommendations 6 and 7 of Crt Monitor's 224th rpt by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4456−1] fourth accounting report re expenditures for the DSCA expansion at Guerrero for the Jan−Apr 1993 period. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4460 250th Report −−166th rpt re: overcrowding w/exh D by Vincent M. Nathan re: (np) Modified on 06/04/1993 (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4461 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,651.50 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias for the period of May 1993 (np) Modified on 06/04/1993 (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4462 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,718.75 of atty Luis M. Villaronga for the month of May 1993 (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4457−1] joint inf mot re: pts have resolved all matter addressed to the Crt. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4463 ORDER that the Clerk issue a check in the amt of $18,976.53 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4464 251th Report −− 167th rpt re: overcrowding w/exh D by Vincent M. Nathan re: (np) Modified on 06/04/1993 (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4465 249th Report −− 165th rpt re: overcrowding by Vincent M. Nathan re: (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4466 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $5,286.40 of atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for the period of May 1993 (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)
4467 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 6/23/93 to oppose to mot to hold defts in contempt for violations of Crt orders on the construction of a psychiatric hospital (np) (Entered: 06/04/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 93 of 513

06/04/1993 06/04/1993 06/04/1993 06/04/1993 06/07/1993
06/07/1993 06/07/1993 06/07/1993 06/07/1993 06/08/1993 06/08/1993 06/08/1993 06/08/1993
06/09/1993 06/09/1993 06/09/1993 06/09/1993 06/09/1993

4468 JOINT MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time until 6/7/93 to file sttlement agreement in re: matters set for hrg. (np) (Entered: 06/07/1993)
4469 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,322.80 of atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for the month of May 1993 (np) (Entered: 06/07/1993)
4470 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $374.75 of atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of May 1993 (np) (Entered: 06/07/1993)
4471 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $22,216.48 and expenses in the amt of $672.09 for a total of $22,888.57 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for the month of May 1993 (np) (Entered: 06/07/1993)
4472 ORDER granting [4471−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $22,216.48 and expenses in the amt of $672.09 for a total of $22,888.57 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for the month of May 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/07/1993)
4473 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. The Clerk is to pay invoice #9801 in the amt of $1,625 for services provided for the month of April 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/07/1993)
4474 ORDER that the clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $21,052.00 to SEDUE ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/07/1993)
4475 ITEMIZED stmt of time and expenses for the period of May 2 thru May 31, 1993 in the amt of $109,037.79 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 06/08/1993)
4476 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $9,873.15 for atty Pia Gallegos for the month of May 1993 (np) (Entered: 06/08/1993)
APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for permission to increase compensation for Deputy Monitor Arron Guevara from $42,000. to $45,000. per year w/memorandum in support thereof attached. (il) (Entered: 06/10/1993)
APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for financial support for Chief Health Care Coordinator and Special Consultant Aida Guzman Font in the amt of $72,500. w/memorandum in support thereof. (il) (Entered: 06/10/1993)
4477 STIPULATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Johnny Colon on the Rio Piedras complex and other matters (il) (Entered: 06/10/1993)
4478 ORDER granting [4465−1] report, granting [4464−1] report, granting [4460−1] report, granting [4424−1] report, granting [4423−1] report, granting [4370−1] report, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/10/1993)
4479 MOTION SUBMITTING financial statements for fiscal year ending 3−31−93 w/memorandum in support thereof and attachs., by Vincent M. Nathan (il) (Entered: 06/10/1993)
4480 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of 5/93 in the amt of $1,728.48 plus expenses purs to order of 2−21−91 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 06/10/1993)
COPY of Manager's check #427248 from Banco Central Hispano in the amt of $22,888.57 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (il) (Entered: 06/10/1993)
4481 ORDER granting [4450−1] sealed document re: w/d of atty H. Nachman ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)
4482 ORDER approving the Crt's Monitor itemized stmt of time and expenses in the amt of $109,037.79 for the month of May ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 94 of 513

06/09/1993 06/09/1993 06/09/1993 06/10/1993 06/10/1993 06/10/1993 06/11/1993 06/11/1993 06/11/1993 06/14/1993 06/14/1993 06/14/1993
06/14/1993
06/15/1993 06/15/1993 06/15/1993

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427430 in the amt of $21,052.00 payable to SEDUE (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427429 in the amt of $1,625 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427427 in the amt of $18,976.53 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4483 SIXTY FIRST Report by Defendant−All re: population and of admissions and releases, expanded furlough program, and expansion of halfway house facilities. (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4484 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of fourth quarterly accounting rpt regarding the Ponce Pilot Project w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4485 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4486 252nd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 168th report of overcrowding w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4489 ORDER granting atty's fees of atty H. Anduze for the months of Sep, Oct, Dec 1992 and Jan, Feb, Mar and Apr 1993. The Clerk shall issue check in the amt of $14,847.80 payable to Harry Anduze. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4490 ORDER that the Clerk advance atty Pia Gallegos the sum of $26,963.29 in attys fees and expenses for the months of Mar, Apr and May 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4487 253rd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 17th report regarding calculation of overcrowding. (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4488 MOTION SUBMITTING application for employment of Jerry A. O'Brien, as an expert in correctional security and staffing by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 06/15/1993)

4494

**VACATED SEE 9971 ORDER**ORDER approving stipulation on the Rio Piedras Complex and other matters. The following mots are dismissed: plffs' mot for emergency relief (custodial staffing) at the Rio Piedras complex, mot to amend order re conditions at State Penitentiary complex, mot for a hrg to establish the extent of defts' failure to provide policy and procedure manuals, mot for OSC why defts should not be hld in contempt and plffs' oppos to defts' plan for the provision of mental health services for female inmates, mot req permanent discharge of fines and defts' 3/12/93 mot req permanent discharge of fines. Confirming the 159th report of the Court Monitor in re assessment of policy and procedure manual. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) Modified on 8/18/2011 (cm). (Entered: 06/16/1993)

4495

ORDER approving application for financial support for Chief Health Care Coordinator and special consultant. The Crt Monitor is authorized to make supp payments from fine monies to Dr. Aida Guzman Font not to exceed $72,500 per year; authorized to make payments from fine monies to Ramon Garcia Santiago, Esq. for time spent providing services as a special consultant to the pts and the Office of the Court Monitor. These payments shall compensate Mr. Garcia at the rate of $120 per hour. The Crt monitor to file quarterly reports in re services rendered by Mr. Garcia ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/16/1993)

4491 STIPULATION on findings of fact by the Crt Monitor regarding actions taken in advance of NCCHC accreditation inspections w/exhs A&B by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano . (np) (Entered: 06/16/1993)

4492 MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano for reimbursement of Fines in the amt of $5,309,275 to the Commonwealth Treasury Dept (np) (Entered: 06/16/1993)

4493 FOURTH Report re: of the program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of HOGAR CREA, INC. pursuant to court's order of 3/1/93 (np) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 95 of 513

06/16/1993 06/17/1993 06/17/1993 06/18/1993 06/18/1993 06/21/1993 06/22/1993 06/23/1993 06/23/1993
06/24/1993 06/24/1993 06/25/1993
06/25/1993 06/25/1993 06/28/1993
06/28/1993 06/28/1993

06/16/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4488−1] mot submitting application for employment of expert, Jerry A. O'Brien as an expert in correctional security and staffing. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/18/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427276 in the amt of $26,963.29 payable to Pia Gallegos, Esq. (np) (Entered: 06/18/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427275 in the amt of $14,847.80 payable to Harry Anduze, Esq. (np) (Entered: 06/18/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4491−1] stipulation on findings of fact by the Crt Monitor regarding actions taken in advance of NCCHC accreditation inspections. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/18/1993)
4496 SECOND Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: relocation of inmates w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 06/21/1993)
4497 254th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 8th report re calculation of overcrowding for the period of Feb 29, 1993 until Mar 18, 1993. (np) Modified on 06/25/1993 (Entered: 06/23/1993)
4498 MOTION SUBMITTING health care statistics for the FIRST SEMESTER of 1992 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 06/23/1993)
4499 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 7/13/93 to oppose to mot to hold defts in contempt for violations of Crt orders on the construction of a psychiatric hospital (np) Modified on 06/25/1993 (Entered: 06/24/1993)
4500 ORDER granting transfer $400,000 from the fine fund to the Ponce Pilot Project's special acct 93−252−098−01−081 at the Treasury of the Commonwealth of PR (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) Modified on 06/25/1993 (Entered: 06/25/1993)
4501 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 8/30/93 to revise feasibility study of chronic long term care unit and final housing plan (np) Modified on 06/25/1993 (Entered: 06/25/1993)
4502 MOTION SUBMITTING report of progress toward the implementation of recommendations 13 through 21 of Crt Monitor's 224th report w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) Modified on 06/25/1993 (Entered: 06/25/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4499−1] motion to Extend Time until 7/13/93 to oppose to mot to hold defts in contempt for violations of Crt orders on the construction of a psychiatric hospital ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4498−1] mot submitting health care statistics for the first semester of 1992. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4496−1] Second inf mot re: concerning relocation of inmates. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4467−1] motion to Extend Time until 6/23/93 to oppose to mot to hold defts in contempt for violations of Crt orders on the construction of a psychiatric hospital ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting [4468−1] joint motion to Extend Time until 6/7/93 to file sttlement agreement in re: matters set for hrg. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4479−1] submission of financial stms for the ending of 3/31/93. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 96 of 513

06/28/1993
06/28/1993 06/28/1993 06/29/1993 06/29/1993 06/29/1993 06/29/1993 06/29/1993 06/29/1993 06/29/1993 06/30/1993 06/30/1993 06/30/1993 06/30/1993 06/30/1993 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 07/01/1993 07/02/1993

ENDORSED ORDER [4502−1] motion submitting report of progress toward the implementation of recommendations 13 through 21 of Crt Monitor's 224th report w/attchs. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4501−1] motion to Extend Time until 8/30/93 to revise feasibility study of chronic long term care unit and final housing plan ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427708 in the amt of $400,000 payable to Ponce Pilot Project special acct #93−252−098−01−081 (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4503 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice in the amt of $46,111.07 for the month of May 1993 w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4504 51st financial report by EBP re: expenses for the month of May 1993. (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4505 ORDER granting [4491−1] stipulation on findings of fact by the Crt Monitor regarding actions taken ina dvance of NCCHC accreditation inspections ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4506 ORDER granting [4497−1] motion for Pia Gallegos to Withdraw as Attorney (Terminated attorney Pia Gallegos for Carlos Morales−Feliciano ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4507 ORDER granting [4486−1] 252nd report of the Crt Monitor −−168th rpt ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) Modified on 07/01/1993 (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4508 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $2,250 for the month of May 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4509 ORDER granting [4493−1] report. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $23,770.09 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4510 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 8/26/93 to comply w/the recommendations 24 thru 27 found in the order confirming the 224th rpt of the Crt Monitor (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4511 MOTION SUBMITTING accounting of expenditures of fine monies for the months of April and May 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4512 MOTION by Vincent M. Nathan for transfer of Funds in the amt of $500,000 in fine monies to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4513 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly sanitation and maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans and req ext of time to file English transl w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/01/1993)
4514 MOTION regarding 1/12/93 order in re: report on the expansion of the DSCA Program at Guerrero by Defendant−All . (np) (Entered: 07/02/1993)
4515 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 8/3/93 to file 7th semi annual comprehensive report (np) (Entered: 07/02/1993)
4516 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $687.50 for the month of Jun 1993 of atty Luis M. Villaronga (np) (Entered: 07/02/1993)
4517 NOTICE of change of address of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 07/02/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4503−1] motion information ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 97 of 513

07/02/1993 07/02/1993 07/02/1993
07/06/1993 07/06/1993 07/06/1993 07/06/1993 07/06/1993 07/06/1993 07/06/1993 07/07/1993 07/07/1993 07/07/1993 07/07/1993 07/07/1993 07/08/1993 07/08/1993 07/09/1993

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4512−1] motion for transfer of Funds in the amt of $500,000 in fine monies to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4511−1] mot submitting accounting expenditures of fine monies for Apr and May of 1993. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4510−1] motion to Extend Time until 8/26/93 to comply w/the recommendations 24 thru 27 found in the order confirming the 224th rpt of the Crt Monitor ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
4518 255th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 169th report pursuant to the Crt's order of 7/23/87 (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
4519 MOTION SUBMITTING itemized stmt of time and expenses for the period of Jun 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
4520 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $7,404.24 for the month Jun 1993 by atty Pia Gallegos (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
4521 MOTION SUBMITTING monthly stmt of fees for the month of June 1993 in the amt of $688 by atty J.E. Fernandez Sein by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
4522 NOTICE of filing of summary of time charges for the month of June 1993 by atty J.E. Fernandez Sein. (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
4523 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney's time and expenses reports for June 1993 in the amt of $390.25 by atty J. Williams (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
4524 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $15,421.12 and expenses in the sum of $1,402.54 for the month of June 1993 of atty C. Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 07/07/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4514−1] motion re: rpt of the expansion of the DSCA Program at Guerrero. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/09/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4515−1] motion to Extend Time until 8/3/93 to file 7th semi annual comprehensive report ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/09/1993)
4527 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,682 for fees and expenses for the months of Mar, Apr, May and Jun 1993 to atty J. Williams. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) Modified on 07/09/1993 (Entered: 07/09/1993)
4526 ORDER approving the itemized stmt of time and expenses in the amt of $114,963.60 for the period of Jun 1, 1993 through June 30, 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/09/1993)
4525 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,682 of atty J. Williams for the months of Mar, Apr, May and June 1993 (np) Modified on 07/09/1993 (Entered: 07/09/1993)
4528 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,417.50 for the month of June 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 07/09/1993)
4529 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $13,362 for the months of Sep, Oct and Dec 1992, Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr and May 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 07/09/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427987 in the amt of $500,000 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Int Litigation (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 98 of 513

07/09/1993 07/09/1993 07/09/1993 07/09/1993 07/09/1993
07/09/1993 07/09/1993 07/09/1993 07/09/1993 07/09/1993
07/09/1993 07/12/1993 07/13/1993 07/13/1993 07/13/1993 07/13/1993 07/13/1993 07/14/1993 07/14/1993

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427965 in the amt of $2,250 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #427966 in the amt of $23,770.09 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4530 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of June 1993 of atty Harry Anduze in the amt of $1,320.40 (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4531 APPLICATION by EBP for Appointment of Counsel Guillermo Ramos as legal counsel for the EBP in re: KSP Surety & Bonding Corp fld a comp on 7−1−93 (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4531−1] motion for Appointment of Counsel Guillermo Ramos as legal counsel for the EBP in re: KSP Surety & Bonding Corp fld a comp on 7−1−93 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4532 ORDER confiming 255th rpt of Crt Monitor−− 169th rpt ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4533 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $16,823.66 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4534 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,404.24 in atty's fees and expenses of atty Pia Gallegos for the month of June 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4535 ORDER granting tranfer of funds for the Ponce Pilot Project to cover operational costs in the amt of $800,000 for the fine fund's special acct 93−252−098−01−081 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4536 ORDER approving joint mot req reimbursement of fines. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $5,309,275 payable to the Dept of the Treasury of PR. The Clerk shall deliver the check to MR. Garcia Gregory to receive the money ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4537 ORDER amending the Medical Plan as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4538 62nd Report by Defendant−All re: report of population and of admissions and releases, expanded furlough program, expansion of halfway house facilities (np) (Entered: 07/13/1993)
4539 ORDER granting transfer of funds in the amt of $500,000 from the fine fund to the Ponce Pilot Project's special acct 93−252−098−01−081 at the Treasury Dept of PR ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/15/1993)
4540 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,058.88 payable to Harry Anduze Montano ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/15/1993)
4541 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to [4383−1] motion for contempt for violations of Crt Orders on the construction of a psychiatric hospital. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 07/15/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #428052 in the amt of $16,823.66 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (np) (Entered: 07/15/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #428047 in the amt of $1,682 payable to J. Williams (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4542 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for leave to join an attorney and a paralegal to the case in compliance w/the Crt's orders appointing lead counsel (np) (Entered: 07/15/1993)
4543 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Banco Santander the amt of $1,485 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/15/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 99 of 513

07/14/1993 07/15/1993 07/15/1993 07/16/1993 07/16/1993 07/16/1993 07/16/1993 07/19/1993 07/21/1993 07/22/1993 07/22/1993 07/22/1993 07/23/1993 07/23/1993 07/23/1993 07/27/1993 07/27/1993 07/28/1993
08/02/1993

4544 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Banco Central Hispano the amt of $3,490. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/15/1993)
4545 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of quarterly sanitation and maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/16/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4542−1] motion for leave to join an attorney and a paralegal to the case in compliance w/the Crt's orders appointing lead counsel ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4546 FIFTH Report re: program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. pursuant to Crt's order of 3/1/93. (np) (Entered: 07/19/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437149 in the amt of $7,404.24 payable to Pia Gallego (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437151 in the amt of $500,000 payable to Ponce Pilot Project special acct 93−252−098−01−081 (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 437150 in the amt of $3,058.88 payable to H. Anduze (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4547 ORDER that the Monitor's application for permission to increase compensation of Arron Guevara is gtd from $42,000 to $45,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4548 ORDER for investment of transactions with Paine Webber, Inc. to the acct 501−00001−7 at Banco Central Hispano. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4549 256th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 9th report regarding calculation of overcrowding. (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4550 MOTION SUBMITTING monthly stmts of fees for the months of Dec 1992 and Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr, May and Jun 1993 by atty J. Fernandez Sein in the amt of $14,534.40. (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4551 AMENDED 51st Report by EBP re: financial report including the amount of bail forfeited for the period of May 1993. (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437262 in the amt of $5,309,275 payable to Dept of the Treasury of P.R. (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4552 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Disbursement of consultant fees to Dr. Cynthia Casanova in the amt of $4,015.63 (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4553 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Disbursement of of expert fees to Steve J. Martin, Esq. in the amt of $15,158.07 for the period of Mar 30, 1993 thru Jun 30, 1993 (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4554 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Hearing on Forensic Hospital contempt motions and req ext of 30 days to complete discov (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4556 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625 for the month of Jun 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4555 OPINION AND ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $13,362 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for attys fees for the months of Sep, Oct and Dec, 1992, Jan, Feb, Mar, Apr and May 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (np) (Entered: 07/29/1993)
4557 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans and req for ext of time until 8/30/93 to file transl by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 100 of 513

08/02/1993
08/02/1993 08/02/1993 08/02/1993 08/03/1993 08/03/1993 08/03/1993 08/03/1993 08/04/1993 08/04/1993 08/05/1993
08/05/1993
08/05/1993 08/05/1993
08/05/1993
08/05/1993 08/05/1993 08/05/1993 08/05/1993 08/05/1993 08/05/1993
08/05/1993

4558 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan req permission for the Crt Monitor to employ a consultant in environmental health Dr. Bailus Walker w/memorandum (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4559 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice of June 1993 of operating expenses in the amt of $47,559.83. (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4560 52nd report by EBP re: financial report for the period of June 1993 (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4561 MOTION SUBMITTING fifth quarterly accounting report regarding Ponce Pilot Project for the period of June 1993 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4562 ORDER consolidating Civ. 93−2014 (PG) with this case ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4563 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 9/1/93 to file seventh semi−annual comprehensive report (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4564 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,176.20 for atty Carlos E. Ramos (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4565 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $25,946.84 to Hogares Crea, Inc. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/04/1993)
4566 MOTION SUBMITTING monthly stmt of fees for the month of July for atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein in the amt of $4,712 (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4567 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time until 8−25−93 to file time and expenses reports by J. Williams (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4568 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of July 1993 of atty Luis M. Villaronga in the amt of $6,718.75 (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4569 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of July 1993 in the amt of $7,683.91 and expenses $831.23 of atty C. Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4570 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of July 1993 for atty Rachel Brill in the amt of $7,600 (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4571 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of July 1993 of atty Harry Anduze in the amt of $1,872 and expenses $47.75 (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4557−1] mot submitting quarterly food service audits and corrective action plan. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4559−1] informative mot re EBP invoice of expenses. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4560−1] 52nd report of the EBP. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #426636 in the amt of $13,362 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez. (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #426635 in the amt of $25,946.84 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #426634 in the amt of $1,625 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4572 ORDER granting the Crt Monitor permission to employ Theodore Gordon as a consultant in environmental health ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4563−1] motion to Extend Time until 9/1/93 to file seventh semi−annual comprehensive report ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 101 of 513

08/06/1993 08/06/1993 08/09/1993
08/09/1993 08/09/1993 08/09/1993 08/09/1993 08/09/1993 08/09/1993
08/10/1993 08/10/1993 08/10/1993 08/11/1993 08/11/1993
08/11/1993 08/11/1993 08/11/1993
08/11/1993
08/12/1993 08/12/1993 08/12/1993

Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4573 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,355 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4574 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,919.75 payable to atty Harry Anduze ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4553−1] motion for Disbursement of of expert fees to Steve J. Martin, Esq. in the amt of $15,158.07 for the period of Mar 30, 1993 thru Jun 30, 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4575 MOTION SUBMITTING itemized stmt of time and expenses for the month of July 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4576 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,015.63 to Dr. Cynthia Casanova ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4577 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check payable to Jose E. Fernandez in the amt of $14,534.40 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4581 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $390.25 payable to Jeffrey Williams. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4582 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $687.50 payable to Luis M. Villaronga. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4583 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $688 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4578 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 8/24/93 to file 63rd report in re: status of prisoner intakes and releases (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4579 AMENDED 62nd Report by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4580 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/11/1993)
4584 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,600 payable to Rachel Brill ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4585 ORDER hte Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $5,515.14 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4586 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,176.20 payable to Carlos E. Ramos ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4587 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $15,344.95 payable to Harvey B. Nachman ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4588 ORDER hrg on mot to hold defts in contempt for violations of Crt orders on the construction of a psychiatric hospital. Parties gtd until 9/17/93 to conduct discov. set Contempt Hearing for 9:00 9/27/93 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4589 Informative Motion by EBP re: submitting copy of the engagement letter between the EBP and Guillermo Ramos, Esq establishing his compensation for all legal services in re: KSP Surety & Bonding Corp cmp fld on 7/1/93 against the EBP . (np) (Entered: 08/12/1993)
4590 257th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 170th report of overcrowding (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
4591 AMENDED 61st Report by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
4592 ORDER approving the itemized stmt of time and expenses submitted by the Crt Monitor for the month of July ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 102 of 513

08/12/1993 08/12/1993 08/13/1993
08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/13/1993 08/16/1993 08/16/1993 08/18/1993 08/19/1993 08/19/1993 08/19/1993 08/23/1993 08/23/1993

(Entered: 08/16/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4579−1] amended 62nd report Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4589−1] motion information Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
4593 NOTICE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to take deposition of Johnny Colon, Nevarez & Villavicencio Construction S.E., Public Buildings Administration of the Commonwealth of PR, Grizzette Enid Davila Torres. (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
4594 MOTION SUBMITTING time and expenses rpt for the month of July by atty J. Williams in the amt of $812.50. (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #437734 in the amt of $14,534.40 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437733 in the amt of $688 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437736 in the amt of $15,344.95 payable to Harvey Nachman. (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437741 in the amt of $390.25 payable to J. Williams. (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
4595 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $812.50 payable to J. Williams. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/16/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437739 in the amt of $8,515.14 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (np) (Entered: 08/19/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437738 in the amt of $7,600 payable to Rachel Brill (np) (Entered: 08/19/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437732 in the amt of $1,919.75 payable to Harry Anduze. (np) (Entered: 08/19/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437740 in the amt of $687.50 payable to Luis M. Villaronga, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437735 in the amt of $4,015.63 payable to Dr. Cynthia Casanova. (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437737 in the amt of $2,176.20 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4596 NOTICE of return of check inadvertently issued for attys fees and expenses for June 1993 by atty J. Williams (check #437741 for $390.25) (np) (Entered: 08/19/1993)
4597 SIXTH Report re: program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 08/19/1993)
4598 NOTICE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to take deposition of Administrator of the Administration of Correction of PR. (np) (Entered: 08/19/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437855 in the amt of $800,000 payable to Ponce Pilot Project. (np) (Entered: 08/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437856 in the amt of $105,268.68 payable to EBP. (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #437857 in the amt of $812.50 payable to J. Williams, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)
4599 MOTION by Administrator of Correction of PR for Protective Order re depositions w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)
4600 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly report re expenditures as per the environmental plan by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 103 of 513

08/24/1993 08/24/1993 08/25/1993 08/25/1993 08/25/1993 08/26/1993 08/26/1993 08/26/1993 08/26/1993 08/26/1993 08/27/1993 08/27/1993 08/27/1993 08/30/1993 08/30/1993 08/30/1993 08/31/1993 08/31/1993 08/31/1993 08/31/1993

4601 MOTION SUBMITTING report pursuant to order confirming the 224th report by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)
4602 63rd Report by Defendant−All re: report of population and of admissions and releases, expanded furlough program, expansion of halfway house facilities. (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)
4603 AMENDED 6th Report re: Hogar Crea, Inc. available positions at the Women's Correctional Ins. (np) (Entered: 08/25/1993)
4604 MOTION SUBMITTING the amt of $192,298.49 for the Jan thru May 1993 operating expenses of the EBP by the Commonwealth of P.R. Receipt #68645. (np) (Entered: 08/26/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4604−1] mot reimbursing the funds for the operating expenses of the EBP. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4605 MOTION by Vincent M. Nathan to request permission to increase compensation for Deputy Monitor Chris Jenkins from $42,000 to $45,000 per yr (np) (Entered: 08/27/1993)
4606 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,772.50 for the months of June and Jul 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 08/27/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4603−1] amended 6th report of Hogar Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4607 ORDER confirming the 257th report of the Crt Monitor, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4612 COPY OF ORDER consolidating this case w/Civ. 93−2155 of MIGUEL A. NIEVES RUIZ ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4608 ORDER that the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,772.50 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez Matias, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting [4578−1] motion to Extend Time until 8/24/93 to file 63rd report in re: status of prisoner intakes and releases ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting [4599−1] motion for Protective Order re depositions ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4609 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice of operating expenses for the month of July 1993 in the amt of $57,709.20. (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4610 53rd financial report by EBP (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4611 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION for Protective Order referring to: [4599−1] motion for Protective Order re depositions by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 09/01/1993)
4613 MOTION SUBMITTING revised housing plan by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4567−1] motion to Extend Time until 8−25−93 to file time and expenses reports by J. Williams ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4614 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,712 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein for the month of July 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4615 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,718.76 for the month of July 1993 payable to Luis M. Villaronga ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 104 of 513

08/31/1993 08/31/1993 08/31/1993 08/31/1993 09/02/1993 09/02/1993 09/02/1993 09/02/1993 09/02/1993 09/03/1993 09/03/1993 09/03/1993 09/03/1993 09/07/1993 09/07/1993 09/07/1993 09/07/1993 09/07/1993 09/07/1993 09/07/1993

4616 ORDER the clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,600 for the month of July 1993 payable to Rachel Brill ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4617 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,355 for the month of July 1993 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4618 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $8,515.14 for the month of July 1993 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4619 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,919.75 for the month of July 1993 payable to Harry Anduze ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4605−1] motion to request permission to increase compensation for Deputy Monitor Chris Jenkins from $42,000 to $45,000 per yr ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4620 MOTION SUBMITTING seventh semi−annual comprehensive report in re medical care plan and the mental health plan w/attchs by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4621 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein in the amt of $5,000 (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4622 NOTICE of filing of summary of time charges for the month of Aug 1993 by atty Jose E. Fernandez (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting [4611−1] supplemental motion for Protective Order ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4623 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co in the amt of $2,375 for the month of July 1993 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/03/1993)
4624 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $11,146.72 and expenses $876.91 (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
4625 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Rachel Brill in the amt of $2.962.50 (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
4626 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Luis M. Villaronga in the amt of $1,062.50 (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4613−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4620−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
4627 MOTION SUBMITTING itemized stmt of time and expenses for the month of Aug 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
4628 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez in the amt of $999 (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
4629 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Harry Anduze in the amt of $2,327.52 and expenses $176.37. (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
4630 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Carlos E. Ramos in the amt of $421.12 (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)
4631 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the monthy of Aug 1993 of atty Jeffrey Williams in the amt of $964.25 (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 105 of 513

09/07/1993 09/08/1993 09/08/1993 09/08/1993 09/08/1993
09/08/1993 09/08/1993
09/08/1993
09/08/1993 09/08/1993
09/09/1993 09/09/1993 09/09/1993 09/09/1993 09/09/1993 09/10/1993

4632 NOTICE of designation of alternate lead counsel by Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

4633 Letter MOTION from prisoner ALEJANDRO COLLADO ORTIZ to request order for change of custody level (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

4634 APPLICATION by EBP for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of Guillermo Ramos in the amt of $3,651.11 (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445039 in the amt of $2,375 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 09/10/1993)

4640

ORDER granting [4629−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Harry Anduze in the amt of $2,327.52 and expenses $176.37. Clerk shall issue forthwith a check from the fine fund mentioned herein in the amount of $2,503.89 payable to Harry Anduze Montano. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4641 ORDER vacating [4616−1] order of 8−31−93 since the matter has already been resolved by Order of 8−11−93. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4642

ORDER granting [4624−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $11,146.72 and expenses $876.91. The Clerk shall issue forthwith a check from the fine fund mentioned herein in the amt of $12,023.63 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4643 ORDER granting [4625−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Rachel Brill in the amt of $2.962.50. Clerk shall issue forthwith a check from the fine fund mentioned herein in the amt of $2,962.50 payable to Rachel Brill, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445038 in the amt of $3,772.50 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez Matias. (re: atty's fees for June & July, 1993. (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4644

ORDER amending nunc pro tunc the Order of 8−31−93 as to the advancement of fees to Luis M. Villaronga, Esq. for the month of July, 1993. The amt of $6,178.75 which appears on the second paragraph line 4 of the order, is not correct. The correct amt of money is $6,718.75. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4635 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Bco Central Hispano, acct #50−0226−00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

4636 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Smith Barney Shearson acct #837−08028−14−002 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

4637 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Dean Witter act #356−018124 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

4638 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Bco Santander acct #50−0005−00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/09/1993)

4639 258th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 171st report (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 09/10/1993)

4645

ORDER FOR INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS WITH PAINE WEBBER, INC. re: Sale of U.S. Treasury Notes = Total proceeds on sale are $35,495,200.58. The total amt of investment, including interest is $35,511,099.90 which is to be paid from the proceeds on the sale. The difference of $15,899.32 will be paid by a check to be issued by the Clerk payable to Paine Webber, Inc. of PR. The settlement date of these transactions is 9−15−93. The semi−annual interest payments of the new investment shall be paid to the Clerk by check or wire transfer as stated herein. (

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 106 of 513

09/10/1993
09/10/1993
09/10/1993
09/10/1993
09/10/1993 09/13/1993 09/14/1993 09/14/1993 09/15/1993 09/15/1993 09/15/1993 09/15/1993 09/15/1993 09/15/1993 09/20/1993 09/22/1993 09/22/1993 09/22/1993 09/22/1993

signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4646 ORDER FOR TRANSFER OF INVESTMENT from Paine Webber, Inc. of PR, Account No. JX−12738−03 to BANCO SANTANDER, Account No. 50−0005−00, U.S. Treasury Note investment in the Face Value of $3,040,000, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4647

ORDER FOR TRANSFER OF INVESTMENT from Paine Webber, Inc. of PR, Account No. JX−12738−03, to DEAN WITTER REYNOLDS, INC., Account No. 356−018124, U.S. Treasury Note investment in the Face Value of $12,912,000, etc as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4648

ORDER FOR TRANSFER OF INVESTMENT from Paine Webber, Inc. of PR, Account No. JX−12738−03, to SMITH BARNEY SHEARSON, Account No. 837−08028−14−002, U.S. Treasury Note investment with a Face Value of $14,000,000, etc as stated herein. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4649

ORDER FOR TRANSFER OF INVESTMENT FROM Paine Webber, Inc. of PR, Account No. JX−12738−03, to BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO, Account No. 50−0226−00, U.S. Treasury Note investment with a Face Value of $3,853,000, etc as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4650 ORDER granting [4639−1] 258th Report of Court Monitor. It is hereby confirmed in all respects, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S check in the amt of $15,899.32 payable to Paine Webber, Inc. of P.R. (np) (Entered: 09/20/1993)

4651 MOTION by Administrator of Corrections of the Commonwealth of PR to Extend Time to answer and/or object to req. for production of documents (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

4652 SIXTY−FOURTH Report pursuant to the 4−28−88 court order by Government Defendants (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

Certified copies of Orders, dkts #4645 thru #4650, referred to Financial Clerk. (ni) (Entered: 09/15/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S check #445566 in the amt of $2,503.89 payable to Harry Anduze. (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445567 in the amt of $6,718.75 payable to Luis M. Villaronga. (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445568 in the amt of $12,023.63 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGERS' CHECK #445569 in the amt of $2,962.50 payable to Rachel Brill (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

4653 7th REPORT re: program for rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

4654 MOTION SUBMITTING fire safety audits and corrective action plans and req ext to file English transl until 10−20−93 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

4655 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $23,085.80 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

4656 THIRD Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: relocation of inmates outside of the AOC system. (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

4657 54th financial Report by EBP (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

4658 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice for the month of Aug 1993 in the amt of $58,327.44. (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 107 of 513

09/22/1993 09/22/1993 09/23/1993 09/23/1993 09/23/1993
09/23/1993 09/23/1993 09/24/1993 09/27/1993 09/27/1993 10/01/1993 10/01/1993 10/01/1993 10/01/1993 10/01/1993 10/04/1993 10/04/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4651−1] motion to Extend Time to answer and/or object to req. for production of documents ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4652−1] 64th report by govt defts. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445037 in the amt of $4,712 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 09/24/1993)
4660 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,651.11 payable to Guillermo J. Ramos Luina. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
4661 ORDER for payment of custody fees to Banco Central Corp. in the amt of $100 covering custody services for the period of Sep 13, 1992 to Sep 13, 1993 as per invoice No. 93−187 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
4662 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co in the amt of $1,625 for the month of Aug 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445116 in the amt of $23,085.80 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
4659 MOTION by Defendant−All, Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Continue hrg on new correctional psychiatrict hospital (np) (Entered: 09/27/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4658−1] informative mot re EBP's invoice of Aug 1993 in the amt of $58,327.44. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4659−1] motion to Continue hrg on new correctional psychiatrict hospital ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/30/1993)
4663 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Sep 1993 by atty Rachel Brill in the amt of $3,012.50 (np) (Entered: 10/04/1993)
4664 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $9,784.32 and expenses for $3,988.16 (np) (Entered: 10/04/1993)
4665 ORDER the Clerk shall issue check in the amt of $964.25 for atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses for the month of Aug 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4627−1] itemized stmt of Monitor's time and expenses for the month of Aug 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4632−1] notice of designation of alternate lead counsel. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
4666 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,500 for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Luis M. Villaronga (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
4667 SECOND MOTION to Extend Time to answer and/or object to req for production of docts until 10−11−93 by Adm of Corrections (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
4668 APPLICATION for Attorney Fees in the amt of $281 for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)
4669 MOTION SUBMITTING reimbursement of funds for the operating expenses of the EBP in the amt of $47,559.83. Receipt #69206 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 108 of 513

10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/05/1993 10/06/1993 10/06/1993
10/06/1993 10/06/1993 10/06/1993 10/06/1993 10/06/1993

4670 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,560 and expenses in the amt of $172.37 for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Harry Anduze (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4671 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly sanitation and maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans and req ext until 11/4/93 to file English transl by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4672 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,062.50 for fees for the month of Aug 1993 to atty Luis M. Villaronga ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4673 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,503.02 for fees for the month of Aug 1993 for atty Harry Anduze. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4674 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $999 for fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4675 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $5,000 for fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4676 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $421.12 for fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4677 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,012.50 for fees for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Rachel Brill ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4678 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $13,772.48 for fees for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4679 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,962.50 for fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Rachel Brill ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4680 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,023.63 for fees for the month of Aug 1993 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4681 259th REPORT by Vincent M. Nathan re: 10th report regarding calculation of overcrowding. (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4682 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan for permission to make severance payment to Manuel Romero from fine monies in the amt of $19,179.50 and req that the Crt approves payment of moving expenses not to exceed $5,000 (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4683 MOTION SUBMITTING accounting expenditures of fine monies for the months of June and July 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4684 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $900 for the month of Sep 1993 for atty Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4685 NOTICE of filing of time charges for the month of Sep 1993 by atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4686 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,712 for the month of Sep 1993 for atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 10/07/1993)

4688

ORDER granting [4670−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,560 and expenses in the amt of $172.37 for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Harry Anduze. Clerk shall issue check forthwith from fine fund in the amt of $1,732.37 payable to Atty Anduze. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 109 of 513

10/07/1993 10/08/1993 10/08/1993 10/08/1993 10/08/1993
10/08/1993 10/08/1993 10/12/1993 10/12/1993 10/12/1993 10/12/1993 10/12/1993 10/12/1993 10/12/1993
10/12/1993 10/12/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993

4687 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $900 for the month of Sep 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez. (np) (Entered: 10/08/1993)

4689 ORDER vacating [4679−1] order re: payment of $12,023.63 to Rachell Brill. These fees were paid , See dkt #4643. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4690 ORDER vacating [4680−1] order re: payment of $12,023.63 to Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. These fees were paid, See dkt #4642. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4634−1] motion for Attorney Fees for the month of Aug 1993 of Guillermo Ramos in the amt of $3,651.11 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4691

APPLICATION w/memorandum in support thereof by Vincent M. Nathan for Appointment of Annette Ramirez de Arellano as additional medical Expert The Court monitor recommends she be compensated at the rate of $750.00 a day for work performed in PR and at a rate of $125.00 per hour for services performed outside of PR. (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4692 APPLICATION by EBP for Attorney Fees to Guillermo Ramos Luina in the amt of $1,383.65 (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4693 NOTICE of filing of atty's time and expenses reports for September w/attach, by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4694 MOTION SUBMITTING first quarterly accounting report for the fiscal year 1993−1994 Ponce Pilot Project, by government Defendants w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4695 MOTION SUBMITTING itemized statement of monitor's time and expenses for the month of September, 1993, w/attach by Vincent M. Nathan (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4696 MOTION SUBMITTING english translations of quarterly fire safety audits and corrective action plans w/attach by Government Defendants (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4667−1] motion to Extend Time to answer and/or object to req for production of docts until 10−11−93 by Adm of Corrections ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER [4669−1] miscellaneous Noted. re: Check in the amt of $47,559.83 deposited on 10/5/93 for operating expenses of June 1993 of the EBP. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4697 ORDER granting [4695−1] miscellaneous re: itemized statement of fees and expenses covering period of 9−1−93 thru 9−30−93, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4698 ORDER granting [4682−1] motion for permission to make severance payment to Manuel Romero from fine monies in the amt of $19,179.50 and req that the Crt approves payment of moving expenses not to exceed $5,000 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

ENDORSED ORDER [4683−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4699 ORDER granting [4691−1] motion for Appointment of Annette Ramirez de Arellano as additional medical Expert ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)

4700 QUARTERLY Report concerning activities of special consultant by Vincent M. Nathan re: (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)

4701 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,500 for fees of Sep 1993 payable to Luis M. Villaronga ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 110 of 513

10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993
10/13/1993
10/13/1993
10/13/1993
10/13/1993
10/13/1993 10/13/1993
10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/13/1993 10/14/1993 10/14/1993
10/14/1993 10/15/1993

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445482 in the amt of $3,651.11 payable to Guillermo J. Ramos. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445487 in the amt of $1,062.50 payable to Luis M. Villaronga. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445483 in the amt of $1,625 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445484 in the amt of $100 payable to Bco Central Hispano. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445485 in the amt of $13,772.48 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445481 in the amt of $3,012.50 payable to Rachel Brill. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4702 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $900 for fees of Sep 1993 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4703 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,732.37 for fees of Sep 1993 payable to Harry Anduze. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4704 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $282.75 for fees of Sep 1993 payable to Jeffrey Williams. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4705 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,712.00 for fees of Sep 1993 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4706 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $281 for fees of Sep 1993 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445486 in the amt of $964.25 payable to Jeffrey Williams. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #4687: This docket entry is a duplicate of dkt $4684. The Clerk shall proceed accordingly to correct this situation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445491 in the amt of $421.12 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445488 in the amt of $2,503.02 payable to Harry Anduze. (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANGER'S CHECK #445490 in the amt of $999 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez. (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445489 in the amt of $5,000 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
Certified copy of dkts #4688, 4689, 4690, 4634, 4669, 4697, and 4682 (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1993)
4707 MOTION by Defendant−All to request approval of contract documents pursuant to the facilities rehabilitation program (FRP) w/six binders attached (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4708 MOTION SUBMITTING final reports for tasks 1−H, 1−I and 1−J of the facilities rehabilitation program (FRP) w/binder by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4709 260th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 172nd report (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 111 of 513

10/15/1993 10/18/1993
10/18/1993 10/18/1993
10/19/1993
10/19/1993
10/19/1993 10/20/1993 10/21/1993 10/21/1993 10/21/1993
10/25/1993 10/25/1993 10/25/1993
10/26/1993
10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993

4710 EIGHTH Report re: of the program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4711 ORDER confirming the 260th report of the Crt Monitor −− 172nd report (overcrowding) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4712 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $20,798.54 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4713 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of quarterly sanitation and maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4714 SIXTY−FIFTH Report by Defendant−All re: report of population and of admissions and releases, expanded furlough program, expansion of halfway house facilities. (np) (Entered: 10/20/1993)
4715 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: concernings Tasks 1−L and 1−M of the facilities rehabilitation program and mot in compliance w/requirements of Task 2−C. (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
4716 MOTION SUBMITTING substitution of exh to the RJAG agreement for the one submitted w/defts mot dated 7/22/92 by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
4717 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time to file English translations of exhs A,B and C to the mot fld on 10/19/93 #4715 until 11/18/93 (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #445848 in the amt of $20,798.54 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
4718 MOTION SUBMITTING fourth quarterly report prepared by RJAG (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
4719 ORDER in Civ. 93−1985 of KSP Surety Bonding Corp. consolidating this action with Civ. 79−04. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4714−1] Sixty−fifth report. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4708−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4700−1] quarterly report in re activities of special consultant by Monitor. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
4720 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Temporary Restraining Order to correct violations of plffs' constitutional rights and violations of Crt orders w/stmt of Steve Martin (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
4721 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE to defts' counsel of TRO mot by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (np) (Entered: 10/26/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446161 in the amt of $105,268.68 payable to Expedited Bail Project (np) (Entered: 10/27/1993)
4722 MOTION SUBMITTING fifth sixty day compliance progress report for the State Penitentiary complex by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 10/27/1993)
4723 248th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: staffing patterns for Administration of Correction Facilities (np) (Entered: 10/27/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446167 in the amt of $282.75 payable to Jeffrey Williams. (np) (Entered: 11/01/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446163 in the amt of $900 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 112 of 513

10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/26/1993 10/27/1993
10/28/1993
10/28/1993 10/28/1993 10/29/1993 10/29/1993 11/01/1993 11/01/1993 11/02/1993 11/02/1993 11/02/1993 11/02/1993 11/02/1993 11/02/1993 11/02/1993

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446164 in the amt of $1,500 payable to Luis M. Villaronga (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446166 in the amt of $1,732.37 payable to Harry Anduze. (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
4727 Minute entry: MEETING IN CHAMBERS called. Parties stated that they are willing to stipulate the TRO. The stipulation is discussed and plffs will submit a proposed form of order. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446165 in the amt of $1,712 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446162 in the amt of $281 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez. (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4724 INFORMATIVE LETTER/MOTION from CONFINADOS BAJO LA CUSTODIA DE LA ADMINISTRACION DE CORRECCION PRO DERECHO AL CONFINADO in re: conditions at the Inst. Regional de Bayamon, req the establishment of "Comite de Confinados", etc. (np) (Entered: 11/01/1993)
4728 TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER that defts are enjoined to reduce the inmate populations at Section Q of the Bayamon Metropolitan Inst. (Bayamon 308); to bring up the custodial staff to cover all positions, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
4729 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,975 for the month of Sep 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4722−1] motion enclosing fifth sixty day compliance progress rpt for the State Penitentiary complex. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
4725 262nd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 11th report regarding calculation of overcrowing (np) (Entered: 11/01/1993)
4726 233rd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: security and staffing consultant's report of the Oct 26−29, 1992 security and staffing audit of Bayamon 292, Bayamon 1072, Arecibo, Camp La Pica and the Ponce Pilot Project. (np) (Entered: 11/01/1993)
4730 261st report of Vincent M. Nathan re: 173rd report (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
4731 263rd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 174th report (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 11/02/1993)
4732 NOTICE of filing of mot for approval of costs and atty fees in the amt of $1,936. for the month of Oct 1993 by Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (np) (Entered: 11/03/1993)
4733 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans and req ext to file English translations by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 11/03/1993)
4734 MOTION by EBP requesting that stmt of uncontested facts be deemed admitted and that summ jdmt be ent'd in Civ. 93−1985 (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4717−1] motion to Extend Time to file English translations of exhs A,B and C to the mot fld on 10/19/93 #4715 until 11/18/93 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4716−1] mot req substitution of exh ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4715−1] inf mot re: tasks 1−L and 1−M of the facilities rehabilitation program and mot in compliance w/requirements of task 2−c. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4718−1] mot submitting fourth quarterly rpt prepapred by RJAG. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 113 of 513

11/04/1993 11/04/1993 11/04/1993 11/04/1993 11/05/1993 11/05/1993 11/05/1993 11/05/1993
11/05/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993 11/08/1993

4735 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $514.80 of atty Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for the month of Oct 1993 (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
4736 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,125 of atty Luis M. Villaronga for the month of Oct 1993 (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
4737 MOTION SUBMITTING itemized stmt of time and expenses for the month of Oct 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
4738 264th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 175th report (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 11/05/1993)
4739 FIFTY FIFTH financial Report by EBP (np) (Entered: 11/08/1993)
4740 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice for the month of Sep 1993 in the amt of $52,411.25. (np) (Entered: 11/08/1993)
4741 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,435.20 and expenses for $43.87 for the month of Oct 1993 of atty Harry Anduze. (np) (Entered: 11/08/1993)
4742 MOTION by Defendant−All to request approval of contract documents pertaining to water distribution improvements at Sabana Hoyos Correctional Ins., Sabana Hoyos Penal Camp, and State Penitentiary as well as the construction documents for Phase I of El Zarzal Penal Camp (np) (Entered: 11/08/1993)
4743 APPLICATION by EBP for Attorney Fees to Guillermo Ramos in the amt of $543.21 for the month of Oct 1993 (np) (Entered: 11/08/1993)
4744 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $105.75 and $12 for expenses of atty Jeffrey Williams for the month of Oct 1993 (np) (Entered: 11/08/1993)
4745 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $6,331.25 to Rachel Brill for the month of Oct 1993 (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
4746 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,650 for the month of Oct 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
4747 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Dean Witter, Acct #356−018124 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
4748 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Banco Central Hispano, Acct #50−0226−00, JX−12738−03 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
4749 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber, Inc. from Banco Santander Acct #50−0226−00, JX−12738−03 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
4750 MOTION by Defendant−All requesting permission to use housing areas B−1 and C−1 of State Penitentiary to full capacity w/sworn stmt (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4733−1] mot submitting quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans and req ext to file English transl. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446473 in the amt of $1,975 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
4752 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,469.40 for fees during the months of April and May 1993 of atty Carlos E. Ramos ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
4753 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,383.65 for fees for the month of Oct 1993 to atty Guillermo Ramos ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez )

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 114 of 513

11/08/1993 11/09/1993 11/09/1993 11/10/1993 11/10/1993 11/10/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/12/1993 11/15/1993 11/15/1993

(np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
4754 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,479.07 for fees for the month of Oct 1993 to atty Harry Anduze. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
4751 ORDER for investment transactions with Paine Webber, Inc., etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/09/1993)
4755 ORDER approving the itemized stmt of time and expenses for the month of Oct 1993 of the Court Monitor in the amt of $67,138.92 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
4756 ORDER amending nunc pro tunc order #4749 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4739−1] fifty fifth financial report by the EBP. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4740−1] informative mot re EBP's invoice for the month of Sep 1993. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/12/1993)
4757 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to file instanter time records and expenses for the month of Oct 1993 (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4758 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $8,567.52 and expenses $487.28 for the month of Oct 1993 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4759 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $20,798.54 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4760 ORDER approving the 261st report of the Crt Monitor ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4761 ORDER approving the 263rd report of the Crt Monitor ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4762 ORDER approving the 264th report of the Crt Monito ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4763 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,650 for the month of Oct of atty Nora L. Rodriguez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4764 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,331.25 for the month of Oct 1993 of atty Rachel Brill ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4765 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $105 for the month of Oct of atty Jeffrey Williams ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4766 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,125 for the month of Oct 1993 of atty Luis M. Villaronga ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4767 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,936 for the month of Oct 1993 of atty Jose E. Fernandez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4768 NINTH Report re: program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4769 MOTION by Johnny Colon to Extend Time until 11−30−93 to answer the compt in Civ. 93−1985 (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4770 265th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 176th report (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 115 of 513

11/16/1993 11/16/1993
11/16/1993
11/17/1993 11/17/1993 11/18/1993 11/22/1993 11/22/1993
11/22/1993
11/22/1993
11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/23/1993 11/29/1993 11/29/1993

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446629 in the amt of $20,798.54 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4771 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $9,054.80 for the month of Oct 1993 of atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4772 Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: summary of the deficiencies during the sweeps held on 11/3/93 and 11/4/93 in the correctional institutions. (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4773 266the Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 177th report (overcrowding) w/exh D (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4775 ORDER consolidating Civ. 92−1284 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4774 ORDER approving the 265th report of the Crt Monitor ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 11/18/1993)
4776 Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 267th report 178th report of overcrowding w/exhs. (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4772−1] report of a summary of the deficiencies OCM staff encountered during visits to each institution. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4769−1] motion to Extend Time until 11−30−93 to answer the compt in Civ. 93−1985 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4757−1] motion to file instanter time records and expenses for the month of Oct 1993 by atty Garcia Gutierrez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446723 in the amt of $1,650 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446726 in the amt of $1,936 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446718 in the amt of $1,383.65 payable to Guillermo J. Ramos. (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446722 in the amt of $6,331.25 payable to Rachel Brill. (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446721 in the amt of $9,054.80 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446720 in the amt of $4,469.40 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446719 in the amt of $1,479.07 payable to Harry Anduze. (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4777 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446724 in the amt of $105 payable to Jeffrey Williams. (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #446725 in the amt of $2,125 payable to Luis M. Villaronga (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4778 MOTION SUBMITTING accounting expenditures of fine monies for Aug, Sep and Oct 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4779 ORDER appointing members and chair Special Advisory Committee (Dr. Eliezer Curet Cuevas, Julio Pietrantoni, Esq and Professor Luis Gonzalez Vales) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 116 of 513

11/30/1993 11/30/1993 11/30/1993 11/30/1993 12/01/1993 12/01/1993 12/01/1993
12/01/1993
12/01/1993
12/02/1993 12/03/1993
12/03/1993
12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/03/1993
12/03/1993
12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/03/1993
12/03/1993

4780 MOTION by KSP Surety & Bonding for addlt Extend of Time to file oppos to deft Rivera's EBP mot for summ jdmt in Civ. 93−1985 (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4781 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Juan A. Garcia to Dismiss , for More Definite Statement in Civ. 93−1985 (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4782 268th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 179th report of overcrowding. (np) Modified on 12/02/1993 (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4783 269th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 180th report of overcrowding (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4784 ORDER confirming the 266th report of the Crt Monitor 177th report ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4785 ORDER confirming the 267th report of the Crt Monitor 178th report ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4786 ORDER approving the 248th report of the Crt Monitor −−report enclosing staffing patterns for Adm of Correction Facilities ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4787 ORDER approving the 233rd report of the Crt Monitor−− enclosing security and staffing consultant's report of the Oct 26−29, 1993 security and staffing audit of Bayamon 292, Bayamon 1072, Arecibo, Camp La Pica, and the Ponce Complex ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4788 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co in the amt of $1,525 for the month of Oct 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/02/1993)
4789 MOTION by Defendant−All to request approval of docts pursuant to task 1−N of the facilities rehabilitation program w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 12/03/1993)
4790 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,750 for the month of Nov 1993 of atty Luis M. Villaronga (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4791 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for approval of monthly stmt of fees in the amt of $854.40 for the month of Nov 1993 of atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4792 NOTICE of filing of summary of time charges of atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4793 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,696.50 for the month of Nov. 1993 of atty Jeffrey Williams (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4794 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Disbursement of Funds of expert fees to Steve J. Martin, Esq. in the amt of $20,956.93 from period of Jul 1 thru Sep 30, 1993 w/itemized stmt (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4795 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $11,269.44 and expenses of $1,907.26 for the month of Nov 1993 of atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4796 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,850 for the month of Nov 1993 of atty Rachel Brill (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4797 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to allow plfs 10 days to audit the facilities in the B−1 and C−1 housing units at the State Penitentiary (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4798 FIFTY SIXTH financial report by EBP (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4799 APPLICATION by EBP for authorization to utilize funds from the EBP fee fund for the renovation and expansion of the EBP office space and other related expenses (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4800 ORDER confirming the 268 rpt of the Crt Monitor−− 179th rpt ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 117 of 513

12/03/1993 12/03/1993 12/06/1993 12/06/1993 12/06/1993 12/06/1993 12/07/1993 12/07/1993 12/07/1993 12/07/1993 12/08/1993 12/08/1993 12/08/1993 12/09/1993 12/09/1993 12/09/1993 12/09/1993 12/10/1993 12/10/1993 12/13/1993

4801 ORDER consolidating Civ. 93−2387 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4802 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice for the month of Oct 1993 in the amt of $47,161.47. (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4803 ORDER vacating the order of Judge Acosta appointing atty Pedro A. Malavet Cruz to represent plff Hector Manuel Sanchez Castro in Civ. 92−1284 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4804 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,850 payable to Rachel Brill, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4805 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $13,176.70 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) Modified on 12/16/1993 (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4806 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,060.80 and expenses for $39.25 for the month of Nov. 1993 of atty Harry Anduze (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4807 APPLICATION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $967.50 for the month of Nov 1993 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4808 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,100.05 payable to Harry Anduze, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4809 ORDER confirming the 269th rpt of the Crt Monitor−−180th rpt ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4789−1] motion to request approval of docts pursuant to task 1−N of the facilities rehabilitation program w/attchs. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/08/1993)
4810 Letter MOTION by Raymond Rivera−Rios pro−se in Spanish to request order addressed to defts to cease and desist his civil rights violation (tendered) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4780−1] motion for addlt Extend of Time to file oppos to deft Rivera's EBP mot for summ jdmt in Civ. 93−1985 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4778−1] submission of accounting of expenditures of fine monies for Aug, Sep and Oct 1993. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #459880 in the amt of $13,176.70 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #459881 in the amt of $3,850 payable to Rachel Brill, Esq. (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #459879 in the amt of $1,525.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #459882 in the amt of $1,100.05 payable to Harry Anduze. (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)
4811 NOTICE by Vincent M. Nathan of itemized stmt of time and expenses for the period of Nov 1 thru Dec 2, 1993. (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
4817 RESPONSE by KSP Surety & Bonding in opposition to [4781−1] motion to Dismiss by Juan A. Garcia, Johnny Colon, [4781−2] motion for More Definite Statement in Civ. 93−1985 by Juan A. Garcia, Johnny Colon (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
4812 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order for exec of fines pursuant to the 1991 stipulation , to hold defts in contempt ,and to impose Sanctions and reinstate the Crt's order of 9/5/91 (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 118 of 513

12/13/1993 12/13/1993 12/13/1993 12/13/1993
12/13/1993 12/13/1993 12/13/1993 12/13/1993
12/13/1993
12/14/1993 12/14/1993 12/14/1993 12/14/1993
12/15/1993 12/15/1993 12/16/1993 12/16/1993 12/16/1993 12/17/1993

4813 270th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: enclosing security and staffing consultant's report of the Mar−Apr 1993 audit (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
4814 ORDER approving the itemized stmt of time and expenses fld by the Crt Monitor #4811 in the amt of $70,302.58. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
4815 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,696.50 payable to atty Jeffrey Williams ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
4816 ORDER confirming the 8th and 9th rpts of the program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. in the amt of $335.71 for the difference in the 8th rpt, and $30,300.24 for the 9th rpt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4798−1] 56th financial report of EBP. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER [4802−1] inf mot re EBP's invoice for the month of Oct 1993. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4797−1] motion to allow plfs 10 days to audit the facilities in the B−1 and C−1 housing units at the State Penitentiary ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4794−1] motion for Disbursement of Funds of expert fees to Steve J. Martin, Esq. in the amt of $20,956.93 from period of Jul 1 thru Sep 30, 1993 w/itemized stmt ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4799−1] motion for authorization to utilize funds from the EBP fee fund for the renovation and expansion of the EBP office space and other related expenses ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/14/1993)
4818 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $967.50 payable to atty Nora L. Rodriguez for the month of Nov 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
4819 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $854.40 payable to atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for the month of Nov 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
4820 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,750 payable to Luis M. Villaronga for the month of Nov 1993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
ENDORSED ORDER denying w/o prej [4781−1] motion to Dismiss, granting [4781−2] motion for More Definite Statement, granting as to a req for an English transl of the cmp, in Civ. 93−1985 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
4821 TENTH Report of the program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
4822 272nd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 181st report (overcrowding) w/attchs. (np) (Entered: 12/16/1993)
4824 RESPONSE by KSP Surety & Bonding in opposition to Rivera's mot for summ jdmt and/or mot for summ fld in civ. 93−1985 dkt #6 (np) (Entered: 12/22/1993)
4825 RESPONSE by KSP Surety & Bonding in opposition to [4734−1] motion requesting that stmt of uncontested facts be deemed admitted and that summ jdmt be ent'd in Civ. 93−1985 by EBP (np) (Entered: 12/22/1993)
4826 MOTION by KSP Surety & Bonding for Leave to File Spanish doct on mot #4825 (np) (Entered: 12/22/1993)
4827 ORDER approving documents fld pursuant to task 1−N of the facilities rehabilitation program (FRP) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 119 of 513

12/17/1993
12/17/1993
12/20/1993 12/21/1993 12/21/1993 12/21/1993 12/21/1993 12/22/1993 12/22/1993 12/22/1993 12/23/1993
12/23/1993 12/23/1993 12/23/1993 12/27/1993 12/27/1993 12/29/1993 12/29/1993

12/22/1993)

4828 ORDER confirming the tenth report of the program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. in the amt of $26,465.52 to Hogar Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) Modified on 12/22/1993 (Entered: 12/22/1993)

4829

ORDER establishing period for discovery, setting pretrial conf hrg for Apr 5, 1994 at 9am to resolve any outstanding disputes regarding the proposed pre−hrg order and to approve that order. Hearings shall commence on Apr 11, 1994 at 9am; the Crt has set aside two weeks for the conduct of this hrg, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/22/1993)

4830 273rd Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 12th report regarding calculation of overcrowding. (np) (Entered: 12/22/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460114 in the amt of $30,300.24 payable to Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460113 in the amt of $26,465.52 payable to Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460112 in the amt of $105,268.68 payable to Expedited Bail Project for operating expenses of January and February, l994. (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

4831 APPLICATION w/memorandum in support for order requiring reimbursement of the July 23, l987 Fund (Fine Account) in the amt of $35,848.65 by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460164 in the amt of $967.50 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for fees of Nov. l993. (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460165 in the amt of $854.40 payable to Jose E. Fernandez for fees of Nov. l993. (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460166 in the amt of $4,750. payable to Luis M. Villaronga for fees earned during the month of November, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/20/1994)

4832

ORDER directing the defts to deposit within 15 days the amt of $35,848.65 in the registry of the court for deposit in the special fine account established on July 23, 1987; in the alternative, defts shall file evidence of full reimbursement of this amt for the advance made by the court to the Expedited Bail Project for its operating expenses for the month of June 1992. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

4833 SIXTY−SIXTH Report by Defendant−All purs to court order of April 28,1988 re: inmate population (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

4834 AMENDED SIXTY−THIRD Report by Defendant−All purs to court order dtd April 28, 1988 re: inmate population (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

4835 SIXTY−SEVENTH Report by Defendant−All purs to court order dtd April 28, 1988 re: inmate population (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

4836 MOTION by Gerardo Rivera for Leave to File reply to oppos to mot for summary jdmt (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

4837 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 1/5/94 to file response to mot for execution of fines filed by pltfs (il) (Entered: 12/29/1993)

4838 57th Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project purs to the Court's Order of 4/28/88. (il) (Entered: 01/03/1994)

4839 Informative Motion by EBP re: Expedited Bail Project's November, 1993 invoice. (il) (Entered: 01/03/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 120 of 513

12/30/1993 12/31/1993
01/03/1994 01/03/1994 01/04/1994 01/04/1994 01/04/1994
01/04/1994 01/04/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994 01/05/1994

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460306 in the amt of $1,696.50 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams purs to order of 12−10−93. (il) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

4840

FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (Answer due 1/10/94 for Rafael Hernandez−Colon, for Lorenzo Villalba, for Jose E. Soler−Zapata, for Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, for Isabel Suliveres, for Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, for Juanita Gomez, for Heriberto Acevedo, for Julio Acevedo−Asencio, for Julio Garcia−Garcia, for Julian O. McConnie, for Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, for Carlos Romero−Barcelo, for Irba Cruz de Batista, for Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, for Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, for Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, for Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, for Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez, for Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, for Johnny Colon ) amending [7−1] complaint against Zoraida Buxo, Carmen Feliciano, Nestor Galarza, Aixa Mariano, Enrique Garcia−Garcia (il) (Entered: 01/03/1994)

4841 MOTION SUBMITTING review of utilization of Fine Monies by DSCA by Vincent M. Nathan w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/03/1994)

4842 271st Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: enclosing Security and Staffing Consultants' report of their July 1993 Audit. (il) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

4843 APPLICATION w/memorandum of in support thereof for deposit of funds in the amt of $1,000,000. by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

4844 MOTION SUBMITTING Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for November, 1993 by Vincent M. Nathan (il) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

4845 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans purs to March 30, 1990 order and req. ext of time to file English translations by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

4846 MOTION SUBMITTING for approval Monthly Statement of Fees for the month of December, 1993, in the amt of $2,804.80 by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (il) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

4847 MOTION SUBMITTING Attorney's time and expenses Reports for December by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (il) (Entered: 01/05/1994)

4848 APPLICATION for atty fees for the month of December, l993 in the amt of $1,446.40 by Atty Harry Anduze, purs to order of 2−21−91 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

4849 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Carlos Morales−Feliciano by Bruce J. McGiverin (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

4850 Informative Motion by Atty Carlos Garcia re: designation of Atty Jose E. Fernandez as lead counsel for pltfs during his absence from PR. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

4851 APPLICATION for atty fees for the month of December, l993 in the amt of $6,643.75 to Rachel Brill by pltfs. w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

4852 APPLICATION for atty fees for the month of December, l993 in the amt of $16,167.84 and expenses in the amt of $746.71 to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez by pltfs., w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

4853 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 1/14/94 to file response to pltfs mot to execute (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

4854 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $16,914.55 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for payment of atty fees for the month of December, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

4855 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,498.15 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for atty fees during the month of December, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 121 of 513

01/05/1994 01/07/1994
01/07/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994
01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/10/1994 01/11/1994 01/11/1994 01/11/1994 01/12/1994 01/12/1994

4856 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,643.75 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for atty fees during the month of December, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
4857 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #1383 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral & Company. This invoice is covering the services for the month of November, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
4858 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: implementation of six month pilot roster management system. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
4859 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,282.50 for Nora L. Rodriguez for the month of December, l993, w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
4860 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [4853−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/14/94 to file response to pltfs mot to execute by Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Johnny Colon (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4838−1] report Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting [4837−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/5/94 to file response to mot for execution of fines filed by pltfs ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4836−1] motion for Leave to File reply to oppos to mot for summary jdmt ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4835−1] report Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4834−1] report Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4833−1] report Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4839−1] motion information Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4844−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4845−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER, on dkt#4843: The defts shall make the deposit herein ordered within 30 days. set Motion Filing deadline to 2/10/94 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
4861 274th REPORT of Vincent M. Nathan re: 182nd report regarding calculation of overcrowding, w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1994)
4862 ORDER The Clerk of the Court will advance Jose E. Fernandez Sein the sum of $2,804.80 for fees earned during the month of December, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
4863 ORDER confirming the 272nd rpt of the Court Monitor −− 181st rpt. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
4864 ORDER approving the 270th rpt of the Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4849−1] appear/appearance notice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 122 of 513

01/12/1994 01/12/1994 01/12/1994 01/12/1994 01/13/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/14/1994 01/17/1994 01/18/1994 01/18/1994 01/18/1994 01/19/1994 01/19/1994 01/20/1994 01/20/1994

ENDORSED ORDER granting [4853−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/14/94 to file response to pltfs mot to execute ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER denying [4860−1] opposition response ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4850−1] motion information Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4858−1] motion information Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1994)
4865 11th REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea Inc. purs to Court order of 3/1/93. (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
4866 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee in the amt of $36,440. to cover tuition costs for inmates. (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460537 in the amt of $6,643.75 payable to Rachel Brill for the month of December, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460545 in the amt of $16,914.55 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for the month of December, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460540 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Coral for invoice #1383 for the month of November, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
4867 MOTION by Gerardo Rivera to Extend Time until 1/28/94 to file the reply to pltfs cross mot for summary jdmt (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
4868 ORDER The Clerk of the Court is ordered to advance to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez Matias the amt of $1,282.50 for fees earned during the month of December, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460538 in the amt of $1,498.15 payable to Harry Anduze for fees and expenses during the month of December, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/24/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 499445 in the amt of $1,925. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1995)
4869 ITEMIZED statement of Monitors' time and expenses in the amt of $106,127.08 covering the period of December lst thru December 31, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/20/1994)
4870 ORDER Approving the itemized statement of time and expenses submitted by the Court Monitors in the amt of $106,127.08. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/20/1994)
4871 ORDER Approving the 271st Report of the Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/20/1994)
4872 MOTION to submit agreement to address the pltfs mot for execution of fines purs to the 1991 stipulation and to hold defts in contempt and to impose sanctions and to reinstate the Court's Order of 9−5−91 by pts. (il) (Entered: 01/20/1994)
4873 ORDER Approving the amt of $36,440. sought by Father Pico to cover tuition costs for inmates. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/20/1994)
4874 SIXTY−EIGHTH REPORT by govt defts purs to Court order of 4−28−88 re:inmate population (il) (Entered: 01/24/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460645 in the amt of $1,282.50 payable to Nora Rodriguez for fees during the month of December, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 123 of 513

01/20/1994 01/21/1994 01/24/1994 01/26/1994 01/26/1994 01/26/1994 01/27/1994 01/27/1994 01/27/1994 01/27/1994 01/27/1994 01/28/1994 01/28/1994 02/01/1994 02/01/1994 02/01/1994 02/01/1994 02/01/1994 02/01/1994 02/01/1994

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460644 in the amt of $2,804.80 payable to Jose Fernandez for fees during the month of December, l993. (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4867−1] motion to Extend Time until 1/28/94 to file the reply to pltfs cross mot for summary jdmt ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/24/1994)
4875 275th Report of the Court Monitor − 183rd Report purs to Court's Order of 7−23−87 re: overcrowding (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [4874−1] 68th Report. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4876 ORDER Approving the stipulation of January l9, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4877 Progress Report on selected compliance issues by Court Monitor w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4878 ORDER for the transfer of investments from Banco Central Hispano to Paine Webber Inc. in amt of $1,000,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4879 ORDER for the transfer of investments from Dean Witter to Paine Webber Inc., in the amt of $l,850,000. and $2,000,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4880 ORDER for the transfer of investments from Smith Barney Shearson to Paine Webber Inc. in the amt of $3,000,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4881 ORDER for the transfer of investments from Banco Santander to Paine Webber Inc., in the amt of $1,000,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4882 ORDER Approving the 274th Report of the Court Monitor − 182nd Report. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/28/1994)
4883 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans by gov't defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/31/1994)
4884 ORDER Approving Eleventh Report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/31/1994)
4885 APPLICATION for attys fees on behalf of Guillermo Ramos Luinas in the amt of $730.06 for services rendered from November 1st thru December 31, l993. (il) (Entered: 02/02/1994)
4886 58th FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT by Gerardo J. Rivera. (il) (Entered: 02/02/1994)
4887 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S DECEMBER, l993 INVOICE in the amt of $67,516.05 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/02/1994)
4888 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625. for services provided during the month of December, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/02/1994)
4889 ORDER for investment transactions with Paine Webber Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/02/1994)
4890 REPLY to pltfs cross−mot for summary jdmt in Civ. 93−l985 by Gerardo Rivera. (il) (Entered: 02/02/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460885 in the amt of $l,103.19 payable to Paine Webber to cover the difference of total proceeds. (il) (Entered: 02/04/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 124 of 513

02/01/1994
02/02/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994
02/04/1994
02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/04/1994 02/07/1994 02/07/1994
02/07/1994 02/07/1994 02/07/1994 02/07/1994 02/07/1994
02/08/1994

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #460886 in the amt of $1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Corral Co. for services provided during the month of December, l993. (il) Modified on 02/11/1994 (Entered: 02/11/1994)
4891 APPLICATION for fees in the amt of $1,704.00 by Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/04/1994)
4892 ORDER for transfer of investment from Paine Webber to Banco Santander in amts stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4893 ORDER for transfer of investment from Paine Webber to Banco Central Hispano amts stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4894 ORDER for transfer of investment from Paine Webber to Smith Barney Shearson amts stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4895 ORDER for transfer of investment from Paine Webber to Dean Witter amts stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4896 APPLICATION for payment of attys fees to Guillermo Ramos Luina in the amt of $1,461.75 for services during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4897 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,093.75 payable to Rachel Brill for services during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4898 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez by John F. Conrad−Rodriguez (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4899 MOTION SUBMITTING agenda of the proposed negotiations by pts. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [4891−1] mot req. temporary waiver of Local Rule l08.1 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4883: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4887: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4900 APPLICATION of attys fees in the amt of $2,914.80 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4901 276th REPORT of the Court Monitor− 13th REPORT re: overcrowding. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4902 APPLICATION for increase in compensation for Court Monitor from $145.00 per hour to $165.00 per hour effective January 1, l994 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4903 3lst APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $537.00 payable to Carlos E. Ramos for expenses during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4904 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's time and expenses in the amt of $69,220.82 for the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4905 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $1,341.60 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4906 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $1,441.38 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez for the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4907 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans and req. for ext of time to file English translations by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4908 Letter MOTION by Raymond Rivera Rios req. status of case (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 125 of 513

02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/09/1994 02/10/1994 02/10/1994 02/10/1994 02/10/1994 02/10/1994 02/10/1994 02/10/1994 02/11/1994 02/15/1994 02/15/1994

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4902: Granted and so ordered. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1994)
4909 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $1,755.83 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
4910 MOTION for reconsideration of order approving stipulation of January 19, l994 and req. order in relation to notification of mots and documents filed in Court, by Rafael Hernandez Colon and others. (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
4911 ORDER Granting itemized statement of time and expenses in the amt of $69,220.82 submitted by Court Monitors covering the period of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
4912 ORDER Approving the 275th Report of the Court Monitor− 183rd Report purs to the Court's order of July 23, l987, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
4913 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $11,396.26 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
4914 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,375.10 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
4915 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,093.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
4916 ORDER The Clerk shall advance Jose E. Fernandez the sum of $1,704.00 for fees earned during the month of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/10/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4907: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4904: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4899: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4898: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/11/1994)
4917 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,051.80 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for services rendered from November 1993 thru January, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/11/1994)
4918 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,098.00 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for services rendered during the month of December, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/11/1994)
4919 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,914.80 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for services rendered during the month of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/11/1994)
4920 12th REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1994)
4921 ORDER The Clerk is to advance atty Nora Rodriguez the sum of $1,755.83 for fees earned during the month of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461176 in the amt of $11,396.26 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for fees during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 126 of 513

02/15/1994 02/15/1994 02/15/1994 02/15/1994 02/15/1994
02/16/1994 02/17/1994 02/17/1994 02/18/1994 02/18/1994 02/18/1994 02/18/1994 02/18/1994 02/18/1994 02/19/1994 02/22/1994 02/22/1994 02/22/1994 02/22/1994

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461179 in the amt of $2,093.75 payable to Rachel Brill for fees during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461177 in the amt of $1,704.00 payable to Jose E. Fernandez for fees during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461178 in the amt of $1,375.10 payable to Harry Anduze for fees during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461181 in the amt of $23,506.49 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. for services. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4910: The req to declare null and void the mot to submit agreement of Jan. 19, 1994 is taken under advisement. All pts are hereby ordered to notify codefts of all papers, mots and documents filed in this case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
4922 MOTION by pts to hold in abeyance ruling on motions for summary jdmt pending filing of stipulation. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
4923 ORDER approving 12th REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
4924 ORDER (PG) that the Clerk issue a check in the amt of $1,461.75 to Guilllermo Ramos for payment to the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 02/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461258 in the amt of $105,268.68 payable to Expedited Bail Project for operating expenses of March and April, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461261 in the amt of $2,914.80 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of January, l994. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461264 in the amt of $2,098.00 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of December, l993. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461260 in the amt of $1,461.75 payable to Guillermo J. Ramos Luina for legal fees. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461263 in the amt of $1,755.83 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for services during the month of January, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/04/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461262 in the amt of $1,051.80 payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for fees during the months of November, l993 and January 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461259 in the amt of $25,286.65 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. regarding approval of 12th report. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
4925 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to hold in abeyance all pending dispositive mots (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
4926 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to 275th Report of the Court Monitor and to require the office of the Court Monitor to investigate and report within 30 days. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
4927 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano agreeing to resumption of established population levels and to request Court order defts to report measures taken to address security concerns (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
4928 59th Financial report of the Expedited Bail Project by Gerardo J. Rivera (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 127 of 513

02/22/1994
02/22/1994
02/28/1994 02/28/1994 02/28/1994 02/28/1994 02/28/1994 02/28/1994 02/28/1994 03/01/1994 03/01/1994 03/01/1994
03/02/1994 03/02/1994 03/03/1994
03/03/1994 03/03/1994
03/07/1994
03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994

4929 INVOICE of the Expedited Bail Project's operating expenses during the month of January, l994 in the amt of $52,742.39 by Gerardo J. Rivera. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4922 Motion to hold in abeyance ruling on mots for summary jdmt pending filing of stipulation: GRANTED. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4928: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4925: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4926: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4927: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4929: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4930 MOTION by Administrator of Corrections of the Commonwealth of PR to Extend Time 30 days to file certifications (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4931 69th REPORT byf Government Defts regarding overcrowding. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4932 MOTION by Jeffrey Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt of $240.75 for expenses during the month of February, 1994 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4933 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans by gov't defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4934 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral and Co in the amt of $2,125. invoice #1591 for the month of January, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4935 MOTION by Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,892.30 for services during the month of February, 1994 (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4936 MOTION by Jose E. Fernandez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,358.40 for services during the month of February, 1994 (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4937 ORDER Granting Jeffrey Williams the amt of $3,053.25 for expenses during the month of Feb. 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1994)
4938 MOTION by Nora L. Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,330. for services during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/04/1994)
4939 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,892.30 payable to Harry Anduze Montano for services during the month of February, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/04/1994)
4940 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor for the extension of funding for the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)
4941 APPLICATION for permission to employ William Angell and to increase compensation of Kristin Komives and Teal Luthy. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)
4942 SUBMISSION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for December 1993 and January 1994 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)
4943 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $2,223.00 of Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for fees during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)
4944 SECOND Quarterly Report concerning activities of Special Consultant w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 128 of 513

03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/07/1994 03/08/1994 03/08/1994 03/08/1994 03/08/1994
03/09/1994 03/09/1994
03/09/1994 03/09/1994

4945 APPLICATION for deposit of fine funds in the amt of $500,000. to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

4946 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,358.40 to Jose E. Fernandez for fees earned during February, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

4947 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,300. payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for fees earned during the month of February, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4930: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4931: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4933: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1994)

4948 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $13,285.65 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for the month of February, l994. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

4949 MOTION for disbursement of expert fees in the amt of $14,638.81 payable to Steve J. Martin for the months of October1, 1993 thru December 31, 1993. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

4950 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $732.51 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

4951 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $4,443.75 payable to Rachel Brill for the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

4952 SUBMISSION to add exhb to recommendation of Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

4953 SUBMISSION to add exhb. to Vila del Corral & Company's review of Utilization of Fine Monies by the Department of Services to Counter Addiction (DSCA) w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

4954 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's time and expenses in the amt of $69,231.28 for the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

4955 ORDER The proposal to extend funding of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea at seven Administration of Correction institutions at the budgetary level of $285,386.62 is approved, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/09/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4941: Granted and so ordered. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1994)

4956 ORDER Contingent on no objection being filed by any party within ten days of the date of this order, the aforementioned Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses in the amt of $69,231.28 is approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1994)

4957 ORDER That the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $10,146.59 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of February, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1994)

4958

ORDER It is ordered that the Submission of Vila Del Corral & Company's Review of Utilization of Fine Monies by DSCA is approved. Court also accepts the Court Monitor's contention that the expenditures of $522,209. incurred by DSCA after the expiration of the program where reasonable and allowable, and requires that AMSCA submit substantiating documentation for disbursement to DSCA employees in the amt of $110,008. within 30 days, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 129 of 513

03/09/1994 03/09/1994 03/09/1994 03/10/1994 03/10/1994 03/10/1994 03/10/1994 03/10/1994 03/10/1994
03/11/1994 03/11/1994 03/11/1994 03/11/1994 03/11/1994 03/11/1994 03/11/1994 03/14/1994 03/16/1994 03/18/1994

4959 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,443.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of February, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1994)
4960 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $13,285.65 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1994)
4961 ORDER The Clerk shall advance Atty Carlos E. Ramos the amt of $2,223. for fees earned during the month February, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4953: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4952: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4949: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4945: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/11/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4944: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/11/1994)
4962 ORDER Contingent that no objection being filed by any party within ten days of this order, the aforementioned Itemized Statment of Fees and Expenses is hereby approved in the amt of $69,231.28 for the period of February, 1994 by Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/11/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461610 in the amt of $2,125. payable to Vila Del Corral and Co. for invoices covering the month of January 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461613 in the amt of $13,285.65 payable to Bruce McGiverin for fees and expenses during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461605 in the amt of $10,146.59 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #461607 in the amt of $4,443.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461612 in the amt of $3,053.25 payable to Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/16/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461609 in the amt of $1,892.30 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/18/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461608 in the amt of $3,300. payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for fees during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
4963 MOTION by EBP to request order for the modification of the May 20, 1993 for an increase in the allocation of funds for the operating expenses of EBP in the amt of $115,502.61 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1994)
4964 lst REPORT of the Program for Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc., by Elliot G. Alicea (il) (Entered: 03/18/1994)
4965 MOTION SUBMITTING modified progress chart by Vincent M. Nathan w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/22/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 130 of 513

03/18/1994
03/18/1994
03/18/1994
03/21/1994 03/23/1994
03/24/1994 03/25/1994
03/25/1994 03/25/1994 03/25/1994 03/28/1994
03/29/1994 03/29/1994
03/29/1994
03/29/1994 03/30/1994
03/30/1994 03/30/1994 03/30/1994 03/30/1994

4966 ORDER for transfer of investment to Banco Santander from Paine Webber Inc., in the amt of $3,925,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
4967 ORDER for transfer of investment to Dean Witter from Paine Webber Inc., in the amt of $3,500,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
4968 ORDER for transfer of investment to Banco Central Hispano from Paine Webber Inc., in the amt of $1,015,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4964: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461606 in the amt of $2,223. payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for expenses during the month of February, 1994. (il) (Entered: 03/24/1994)
4969 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Clarify exhbs B−1 and C−1 filed with mot dtd 2−22−94 (il) (Entered: 03/25/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #472667 in the amt of $500,000. payable to Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 03/25/1994)
4970 Informative Motion by Carlos V. Garcia re: alternate lead counsel. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4971 MOTION addressing additional security concerns related to housing units B−1 and C−1 of the State Penitentiary by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4972 Informative Motion by DOJ re: notification of orders. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4973 ORDER for investment transaction with Paine Webber Inc., of US Treasury Note in the amt of $3,645,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4969: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4974 MOTION SUBMITTING fire safety audits and corrective action plans and req for ext of time to file English translations by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4975 MOTION by Administrator of Corrections to Extend Time until 4/27/94 to certify that the Chief of Security, Superintendents and Commanders of the Guard of the audited institutions have received and read a copy of the 271st report. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4976 MOTION SUBMITTING quarterly sanitation and maintenance inspection audits and corrective action plans w/attachs. by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4977 RESPONSE of the Office of the Court Monitor to defts mot addressing additional security concerns related to housing units B−1 and C−1 of the State Penitentiary. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4978 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for expenses during the month of Feb.1994 by EBP (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4979 60th Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4980 APPLICATION for payment to Guillermo Ramos Luina for legal services rendered during the month of Feb., l994 in the amt of $1,116.33. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4981 MOTION by Administrator of Corrections to Extend Time until 4/27/94 to file certification regarding the 270th Report of the Court Monitor (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 131 of 513

03/30/1994
03/30/1994 04/04/1994
04/04/1994 04/04/1994 04/04/1994
04/05/1994 04/05/1994 04/05/1994 04/05/1994 04/05/1994 04/05/1994 04/05/1994 04/05/1994 04/06/1994 04/06/1994 04/06/1994 04/06/1994
04/06/1994
04/06/1994
04/06/1994
04/06/1994

4982 ORDER That the Expedited Bail Project's budget for operating expenses be increased to $115,502.61 for each two−month period beginning May 4, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4965: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4983 MOTION SUBMITTING deposit for O.C.M. and EBP accounts by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4984 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $8,406.25 for atty Luis Villaronga for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4985 70th REPORT by gov't defts re:overcrowding. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4986 MOTION notifying amendment to interagency agreement among Administration of Correction, Department of Health and Department of Drug Addiction Services w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4987 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $4,942.40 for atty Jose Fernandez for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4988 ITEMIZED statement of Monitors' time and expenses in the amt of $85,054.40 from Feb. 8th through March 31, l994 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4989 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $1,459.75 for atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4990 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,811.75 for atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4991 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $20,231.18 for atty Carlos V. Garcia for the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4992 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $10,156.25 to atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4993 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $15,663.35 for atty McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4994 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,761. for atty Carlos E. Ramos for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4995 MOTION SUBMITTING expenditures incurred by DSCA in compliance w/Court order dtd 3−8−94 by defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4996 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,482.50 for atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4997 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $23,243.33 to Hogar Crea Inc., for expenses. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4998 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $20,231.18 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of March, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
4999 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $10,156.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of March, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
5000 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $15,663.35 payable to Atty McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
5001 ORDER The itemized statement submitted by the Court Monitor in the amt of $85,054.40 covering the period of Feb. 8th through March 31, l994 is approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
5002 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,811.75 for atty fees payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during March, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 132 of 513

04/07/1994 04/11/1994 04/12/1994 04/12/1994
04/12/1994 04/12/1994 04/12/1994 04/13/1994 04/13/1994 04/13/1994 04/13/1994 04/13/1994 04/13/1994 04/13/1994
04/13/1994
04/13/1994 04/13/1994 04/14/1994

Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1994)
5003 SUBMISSION of accounting expenditures of fine monies for February, l994 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/08/1994)
5004 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,761.00 payable to Carlos E. Ramos for fees earned during the month of March, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/11/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #461611 in the amt of $2,358.40 payble to Jose Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of February, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1994)
5005 MOTION to hold defts in contempt of the Court's various orders to evaluate and remedy unconstitutional environmental conditions, to appoint a director to oversee the Court−ordered facilities rehabilitation program and for other emergency relief w/memo in support thereof, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1994)
5006 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Leave to File documents in Spanish in support of mot #5005. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1994)
5007 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for setting of hrg as to the req for findings of contempt and appointment of FRP Director. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1994)
5008 SIXTH quarterly report prepared by RJAP w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1994)
5009 ORDER The Clerk is directed to transfer the sum of $l,000,000. from fine monies on deposit to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #472983 in the amt of $2,811.75 payable to Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #472979 in the amt of $23,243.33 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #472981 in the amt of $20,231.18 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of March, 1994. (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #472980 in the amt of $10,156.25 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of March, 1994. (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #472982 in the amt of $15,663.35 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
5010 ORDER That the members' decision to forego further consideration of nine proposals and to study more in detail the viability of five proposals is approved, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
5011 RESPONSE by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez in opposition to [5007−1] motion for setting of hrg as to the req for findings of contempt and appointment of FRP Director. by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
5012 RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE. (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #472984 in the amt of $2,761. payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for expenses during the month of March, 1994. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)
5013 SECOND report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Druge Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 133 of 513

04/15/1994
04/15/1994
04/15/1994 04/15/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/19/1994 04/21/1994 04/22/1994 04/22/1994
04/25/1994

5014 ORDER A review of attys fees and expenses paid during 1993 showed that atty Harry Anduze was overpaid $2,503.02. The Clerk shall monitor this account and inform the Court when this overpayment is cleared, etc.,as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)

5015

ORDER Atty Harry Anduze has submitted expenses and attys fees for the month of March, l994. The Court will advance to Atty Anduze the amt of $55.75 for fees and office expenses. Purs to Court order of this same date, the amt of $1,459.75 due to Atty Anduze will be applied to the overpayment of $2,0503.02 and the balance of $l,043.27 shall be refunded by Atty Anduze by check payable to the Clerk of the Court, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/15/1994)

5016 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Leave to File reply to defts oppos to mot for expedited hrg w/reply attached tendered. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

5017 MOTION SUBMITTING revised copy of mot to executed filed on 12−13−93 by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4970: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4971: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4972: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4986: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5008: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4979: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4978: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4977: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4974: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4975: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #473240 in the amt of $1,000,000. payable to Center for Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

5018 MOTION SUBMITTING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPORTING SCHEDULES RELATING TO MORALES FELICIANO SPECIAL ACCOUNT by Vincent M. Nathan w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1994)

5019 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of quarterly Fire Safety Audits and corrective action plans by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/26/1994)

5020 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/26/1994)

5021 SEVENTY−FIRST report for the month of March, 1994 (re: overcrowding) (il) (Entered: 04/26/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 134 of 513

04/25/1994 04/26/1994 04/26/1994 04/26/1994 04/26/1994 04/26/1994 04/26/1994 04/26/1994 04/28/1994 04/28/1994 04/29/1994
04/29/1994 04/29/1994 04/29/1994
04/29/1994
04/29/1994 05/03/1994
05/03/1994 05/03/1994 05/03/1994
05/03/1994 05/03/1994

5022 MOTION SUBMITTING translations of exhbs. by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/26/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5018: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/28/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #473339 in the amt of $115,502.61 payable to Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 04/28/1994)
5023 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S MARCH, 1994 INVOICE IN THE AMT OF $52,066.14 (il) (Entered: 04/28/1994)
5024 61st FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT. (il) (Entered: 04/28/1994)
5025 2nd REPORT OF THE EXTERNAL EDUCATION UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (SEDUE) (il) (Entered: 04/28/1994)
5026 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,264.32 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/28/1994)
5027 MOTION Nunc Pro Tunc for leave to amed the complaint and to enlarge time which process may be served by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 04/28/1994)
5028 STIPULATION by pts . (il) (Entered: 04/29/1994)
5029 MOTION certifying compliance with Court order concerning the 270th and 271th report of the Court Monitor, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/29/1994)
5030 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay invoice #1695 in the amt of $2,625. to Vila de Corral and Company for the month of Feb. 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/29/1994)
5031 JOINT CLARIFICATION OF STIPULATION by pts . (il) (Entered: 05/02/1994)
5032 THIRD REPORT OF THE EXTERNAL EDUCATION UNIVERSITY SYSTEM (SEDUE). (il) (Entered: 05/02/1994)
5033 ORDER The Court will convene a hrg on pltfs mot to hold defts in contempt filed on 4−12−94 at 9:00AM on June 20, l994 . Pts will have until 5−31−94 to complete all discovery. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/02/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #473466 in the amt of $2,625. payable to Vila del Corral & Co. for services provided during the month of Feb. 1994, invoice #1695. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #473465 in the amt of $22,264.32 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1994)
5034 AMENDED ORDER The Court will advance to atty Anduze the amt of $1,459.75 for fees and office expenses to be drawn from the interest earned on the fines paid by the defts purs to and subject to the conditions set out in the Court's order of 2−21−91. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5035 MOTION by Jose E. Fernandez Sein for Attorney Fees in the amt of $6,064. for expenses during the month of April, l994 (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5036 MOTION by Luis M. Villaronga for Attorney Fees in the amt of $7,875. for the month of April, 1994 (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5037 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral and Company in the amt of $1,875. covering the period of March, l994 invoice #1805. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5038 MOTION by Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $9,293.75 for expenses for the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5039 MOTION by Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $15,851.29 for fees during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 135 of 513

05/03/1994 05/03/1994 05/04/1994 05/04/1994 05/04/1994 05/04/1994 05/04/1994 05/05/1994 05/05/1994 05/05/1994 05/05/1994 05/06/1994 05/06/1994
05/09/1994 05/09/1994 05/09/1994 05/10/1994 05/10/1994 05/11/1994
05/11/1994

5040 MOTION by Bruce J. McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $14,161.10 for expenses during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5041 MOTION by Steve J. Martin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $19,955.21 for expenses during the month of Jan. 1994 thru March, 1994. (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5042 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $14,161.10 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of April, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5043 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $15,851.29 payable to Atty Carlos V. Gutierrez for expenses during the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5044 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $9,293.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of April, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5031: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5045 MOTION by Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,725. for expenses during the month of April, 1994. (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5046 MOTION by Atty Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,560.17 for expenses during the month of April, 1994. (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5047 MOTION by Atty Carlos E. Ramos for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,170. for expenses during the month of April, 1994. (il) (Entered: 05/06/1994)
5048 MOTION enclosing Quarterly Food Service Audits and Correction Action Plans by Gov't Defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
5049 MOTION by Jeffrey Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,152. for expenses during the month of April, 1994 (il) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
5050 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall issue a check in the amt of $4,152. payable to Jeffrey Williams for expensed during the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
5051 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall issue a check in the amt of $1,516.90 after deducting the overpayment payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
5052 ORDER Approving defts mot in compliance with March 8, 1994 Court order regarding expenditures incurred by DSCA in the amt of $110,007.96. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1994)
5053 ITEMIZED statement of Monitors' time and expenses in the amt of $128,735.81 for the month of April, 1994. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480694 in the amt of $20,000. payable to Angel Morales Yulfo and Zulma R. Rosario closing savings acct. #501−15015−4. (il) (Entered: 05/23/1994)
5054 MOTION by defts to Extend Time until 5/24/94 to oppose mot Nunc Pro Tunc (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
5055 SUBMISSION of accounting expenditures of fine monies for March, l994 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
5056 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee for the Use of Fine Funds to Conduct a Compensation study following the Recommendation of the Health Care Executive Committee, by Court Monitor w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480730 in the amt of $9,293.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 136 of 513

05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/11/1994 05/12/1994
05/12/1994 05/12/1994 05/13/1994 05/16/1994 05/17/1994 05/17/1994

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480731 in the amt of $14,161.10 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480732 in the amt of $15,851.29 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
5057 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall make check payable to Nora L. Rodriguez in the amt of $3,725. for fees earned during the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
5058 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall make check payable to Jose E. Fernandez in the amt of $6,064. for fees earned during the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5048: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
5059 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall make check payable to Luis M. Villaronga in the amt of $7,875. for fees earned during the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
5060 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall make check payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez in the amt of $1,170. for fees earned during the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/12/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480748 in the amt of $1,516.90 payable to Harry Anduze Montano for expenses during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/13/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480733 in the amt of $1,875. payble to Vila del Corral and Co. for invoice #1805 for services during the month of March, 1994. (il) (Entered: 05/13/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480729 in the amt of $4,152. payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/13/1994)
5061 ORDER Contingent that no objection is filed within 10 days, the Itemized Statment of Fees and Expenses is approved in the amt of $128,735.81 covering the period from April 1 thru April 30, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/13/1994)
5062 ORDER Approving the Use of Fine Funds to Fund Personnel Studies for Correctional Health Services in the amt of $66,000., etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/13/1994)
5063 ORDER The Court Monitor shall issue a check in the amt of $19,955.21 payable to Steve J. Martin for expenses during January 1st thru March 31, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/13/1994)
5064 THIRD REPORT OF THE PROGRAM FOR REHABILITATION OF DRUG USERS UNDER THE AUSPICIES OF HOGAR CREA INC. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1994)
5065 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $30,710. to the Metropolitan University. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/17/1994)
5066 ORDER for the transfer of Investments to Paine Webber Inc. from Dean Witter, Acct. 356−018124 US Treasury Note in the amt of $5,700,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/19/1994)
5067 ORDER for the Transsfer of Investments to Paine Webber Inc., from Smith Barney Shearson, Acct. #837−08028−14−002, US Treasury Note in the amts of $7,200,000. and $1,800,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/19/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 137 of 513

05/17/1994 05/17/1994 05/17/1994 05/18/1994
05/19/1994 05/19/1994 05/23/1994 05/24/1994 05/26/1994 05/26/1994 05/27/1994 05/27/1994 05/27/1994 05/27/1994 05/27/1994 05/31/1994 05/31/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480835 in the amt of $7,875. payable to Luis M. Villaronga for fees and expenses during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480834 in the amt of $6,064. payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses and fees during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480836 in the amt of $1,170. payable to Carlos E. Ramos Gonzalez for fees during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 05/26/1994)
5068 RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE REGARDING HOGAR CREA'S EXPENDITURES ON THE PROGRAM FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DRUG USERS, BY COURT MONITOR. (il) (Entered: 05/19/1994)
5069 ORDER for Investment Transactions with Paine Webber Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/19/1994)
5070 ORDER Approving the recommendation of the Special Advisory Committee regarding Hogar Crea's expenditures on the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/23/1994)
5071 SEVENTY−SECOND REPORT purs to April 28, l988 Court order by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/25/1994)
5072 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of Quarterly Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 05/25/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #480833 in the amt of $3,725.00 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for fees during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5073 APPLICATION for employment of expert Mr. Timothy Roche at a rate of $65. per hour, by CM. (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5074 JOINT MOTION by pts to Extend Time until 6/15/94 to conduct discovery (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5075 APPLICATION for permission for the Special Advisory Committee to employ Maria del Carmen Arteta as an administrative assistant parttime for two days a week at the rate of $200. (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5076 ORDER The Clerk is to issue a check in the amt of $3,482.50 for fees earned during the month of March, l994 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez. (See dkt#4996). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5071: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5072: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5077 ORDER re dkt#5073: Granted, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5078 277th REPORT OF THE COURT MONITOR − Report Regarding Amendment of Population Reports w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5027: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5029: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5023: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 138 of 513

06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/01/1994 06/02/1994
06/03/1994
06/03/1994
06/03/1994
06/03/1994 06/03/1994 06/03/1994 06/03/1994
06/03/1994

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5022: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5020: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5016: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5011: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5003: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4995: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4985: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4983: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#4981: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5006: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5079 REPLY to defts oppos to pltfs mot for expedited hrg. (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5080 62nd FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT for the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5081 INFORMATIVE MOT re Expedited Bail Project's April, l994 invoice. (il) (Entered: 06/02/1994)
5082 ORDER The Clerk shall make check payable to Luis Villaronga in the amt of $8,406.25 for fees earned during the month of March, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5083 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,116.33 payable to Guillermo Ramos Luina for legal services on behalf of Expedited Bail Project (dkt#4980). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5084 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,616.75 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of May, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5085 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,256.25 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of May, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5086 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $18,616.55 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5087 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $4,256.25 for Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5088 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $12,414.20 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5089 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,414.20 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5090 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,281.25 payable to Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 139 of 513

06/03/1994 06/03/1994
06/03/1994 06/03/1994 06/03/1994 06/03/1994 06/03/1994 06/06/1994 06/06/1994 06/06/1994 06/07/1994
06/07/1994
06/07/1994
06/07/1994 06/07/1994 06/07/1994
06/07/1994
06/07/1994 06/07/1994
06/07/1994
06/07/1994

5091 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $21,201.16 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5092 ORDER That the members decision to forego further consideration of nine (9) proposals and to study more in detail the viability of five (5) proposals is approved, etc., as stated herein.(dkt#5012). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5080: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5081: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5074: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5093 STIPULATION by pts . (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5094 REVISED STIPULATION by pts . (il) (Entered: 06/06/1994)
5095 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,503.91 payable to Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
5096 ITEMIZED statement of monitors' time and expenses in the amt of $81,135.64 for the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
5097 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,330.07 payable to Harry Anduze for the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481220 in the amt of $4,256.25 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #481218 in the amt of $12,414.20 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481221 in the amt of $18,616.55 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
5098 278th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: AOC inmates incarcerated in the Continental United States and in Leased facilities in PR (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
5099 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,860. payble to Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
5100 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to request order for increase in rate compensation for atty Jeffrey Williams to $165.00 per hour as a flat rate (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481224 in the amt of $8,406.25 payable to Luis M. Villarong for expenses during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481215 in the amt of $21,201.16 payable to Hogar Crea. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481213 in the amt of $1,116.33 payable to Guilllermo Ramos Luina for expenses. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481217 in the amt of $30,710. payable to Metropolitan University purs to order dtd 5−16−94. (il) (Entered: 06/16/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481223 in the amt of $3,482.50 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for fees during the month of March, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 140 of 513

06/08/1994 06/08/1994 06/09/1994 06/10/1994
06/13/1994 06/14/1994 06/14/1994
06/14/1994
06/14/1994 06/14/1994 06/14/1994
06/14/1994 06/14/1994 06/14/1994 06/15/1994 06/16/1994 06/16/1994 06/16/1994

5101 ORDER Preliminary approving pts stipulation regarding the facilities rehabilitation program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)

5102 ORDER Granting joint mot and preliminarily approving revised stipulation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1994)

5103 Minute entry: By order of the Court OSC hrg set for 6−20−94 is vacated and set aside. Pts are informed that a S/C will be held instead. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1994)

5104 RECOMMENDATION OF THE SPECIAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE TO USE FINE FUNDS TO CONDUCT AN EVALUATION OF HOGAR CREA'S PROGRAM FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DRUG USERS payable by Court Monitor in the amt of $60,000. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1994)

5105 279TH REPORT of the Court Monitor − l4th Report regarding overcrowing. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5094: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5106

ORDER Approving application for permission for the Special Advisory Committee to employ an administrative assistant by the name of Carmen Arteta on a three month trial beg. July 1, l994 on a part−time basis for two days a week, at the rate of $200. per day to be paid out of the fine funds.(dkt#5075). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5107 ORDER Contingent that no objection is filed within ten days, the Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses is approved in the amt of $81,135.64 covering the period of May 1 thru May 31, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5108 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to issue a check in the amt of $1,860. payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of May, l994. (dkt#5099). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5109 ORDER The Clerk of the Court is ordered to issue a check in the amt of $1,281.25 payable to Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of May, l994. (dkt#5090). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5110 ORDER Contingent upon no objection being filed within ten days, Court approves for atty Jeffrey Williams the amt of $2,503.91 for expenses during the month of May, l994. (dkt#5095). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5111 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,330.07 payable to Harry Anduze for fees earned during the month of May, l994. (dkt#5097). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5112 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 7/6/94 to respond to Atty Williams mot to increase rate of compensation (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5113 MOTION SUBMITTING payment for reimbursement of fund in the amt of $313,124.82 by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 06/15/1994)

5114 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal with prejudice by pltfs and deft Gerardo Rivera in Civ. 93−1985(PG). (il) (Entered: 06/16/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5ll3: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/17/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5112: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/17/1994)

5115 280th REPORT OF THE COURT MONITOR− 15th REPORT re: overcrowding. (il) (Entered: 06/17/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 141 of 513

06/16/1994
06/16/1994 06/17/1994
06/17/1994 06/17/1994
06/17/1994 06/20/1994 06/20/1994
06/21/1994
06/21/1994
06/21/1994
06/21/1994 06/21/1994 06/21/1994
06/23/1994 06/23/1994 06/24/1994
06/24/1994 06/24/1994 06/24/1994

5116 FOURTH REPORT OF THE PROGRAM FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DRUG USERS UNDER THE AUSPICIES OF HOGAR CREA INC. (il) (Entered: 06/17/1994)
5117 ORDER, Consolidating Case with 94CV1535 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/20/1994)
5118 ORDER Approving the use of Fine Funds to conduct an evaluation of Hogar Crea's Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users in the amt of $60,000., etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/20/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5114: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/20/1994)
5119 JUDGMENT The Court having entered on this same date an order granting pts mot for voluntary dismissal in Civ. 93−1985, jdmt is hereby entered dismissing this action with prejudice. No costs or atty fees are imposed. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/20/1994)
5120 SEVENTY−THIRD report by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 06/20/1994)
5121 DESIGNATION of alternate lead counsel. (il) (Entered: 06/21/1994)
5122 Minute entry: S/C held. Several aspects of case are discussed as well as the efforts that defts are making in trying to comply with the Court's order. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481462 in the amt of $1,860. payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481460 in the amt of $1,330.07 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1994)
5123 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 7/21/94 to file answer to pltfs 5th amended complaint (il) (Entered: 06/23/1994)
5124 281st REPORT of the Court Monitor − 16th Report re overcrowding. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481459 in the amt of $115,502.61 payable to Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 06/24/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481461 in the amt of $1,281.25 payable to Luis M. Villaronga for fees during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 06/27/1994)
5125 SIXTY THIRD Financial report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 06/24/1994)
5126 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S INVOICE FOR THE MONTH OF MAY, l994 in the amt of $53,805.42. (il) (Entered: 06/24/1994)
5127 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: extension to Pilot Roster Management System. (il) (Entered: 06/27/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5121: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/27/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5120: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/27/1994)
5128 ORDER Denying mot for increase in rate of compensation filed on June 7, 1994 by Jeffrey M. Williams, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/27/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 142 of 513

06/27/1994 06/27/1994 06/28/1994 06/28/1994 06/28/1994
06/28/1994
06/29/1994
06/29/1994
07/01/1994 07/05/1994 07/05/1994 07/05/1994 07/05/1994 07/05/1994 07/05/1994 07/06/1994 07/06/1994 07/06/1994 07/06/1994
07/06/1994
07/06/1994

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5126: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/29/1994)
5132 Letter MOTION by Raymond Rivera−Rios advising that he has been denied placement in a minimum custody cell (il) (Entered: 06/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5127: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/29/1994)
5129 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $21,499.17 to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/29/1994)
5130 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #1962 in the amt of $1,875.00 to Vila de Corral & Co. for the month of April, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/29/1994)
5131 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #1963 in the amt of $2,875. to Vila de Corral & Co. for the month of May, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/29/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481588 in the amt of $2,503.91 payable to Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of May, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/01/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481589 in the amt of $4,750. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. for services during the month of April, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1994)
5139 MOTION by Jeffrey Williams for payment of Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,094.59 for the month of June, 1994. (il) (Entered: 07/06/1994)
5133 MOTION by Jose Fernandez Sein for payment of Attorney Fees in the amt of $935.00 for the month of June, l994 (il) (Entered: 07/06/1994)
5134 MOTION by Rachel Brill for payment of Attorney Fees in the amt of $8,200. for the month of June, 1994. (il) (Entered: 07/06/1994)
5135 MOTION by Bruce McGiverin for payment of Attorney Fees in the amt of $12,086.76 for the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/06/1994)
5136 MOTION by Luis Villaronga for payment of Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,000. for the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/06/1994)
5137 ITEMIZED statement of Monitors' time and expenses during the month of June, l994, by V. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 07/06/1994)
5138 MOTION by Harry Anduze for payment of Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,802.88 for the month of June, 1994. (il) (Entered: 07/06/1994)
5140 MOTION by Nora Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $6,791.56 for the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/07/1994)
5141 MOTION by Steve J. Martin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $22,379.07 for expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/07/1994)
5142 MOTION by Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $18,394.76 for expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/07/1994)
5143 ORDER Approving the amt of $7,738.34 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for attys fees during the month of June, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/07/1994)
5144 ORDER Approving the itemized statement of fees and expenses in the amt of $189,279.02 of the Court Monitor for the period of June, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/07/1994)
5145 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,802.88 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of June, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/07/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 143 of 513

07/06/1994
07/07/1994 07/07/1994 07/07/1994 07/07/1994 07/08/1994 07/08/1994 07/08/1994 07/11/1994
07/11/1994 07/11/1994 07/11/1994 07/12/1994 07/12/1994 07/12/1994 07/12/1994 07/12/1994 07/13/1994 07/13/1994

5146

ORDER Amending Order Nunc Pro Tunc of 6−10−92. The Court directed the Clerk of the Court to issue a check in the amt of $942.50 to the law firm of Dominguez & Totti. Although payment to that firm was appropriate, the Court did not intend for payment to be made from fine monies. Defts will be ordered to deposit the amount of payment to reimburse the fine fund. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/07/1994)

5147 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1994)

5148 MOTION notifying segregation of Guarantee Account by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1994)

5149 MOTION designating Defts' Proposal for the New Program Manager of the FRP and req. the Court's approval. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1994)

5150 MOTION SUBMITTING Plan for Population Projections, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1994)

5151 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $8,200. payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of June, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/11/1994)

5152 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,086.76 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of June, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/11/1994)

5153 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,394.76 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of June, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/11/1994)

5154 AMENDED ORDER approving the Fourth Report of Program for Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea, Inc. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $21,499.17 to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/11/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481801 in the amt of $7,738.34 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/12/1994)

5155 SUBMISSION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for April 1994 and May 1994 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 07/12/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481804 in the amt of $1,802.88 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481822 in the amt of $21,499.17 payable to Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481820 in the amt of $18,394.76 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481823 in the amt of $8,200. payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #481821 in the amt of $12,086.76 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5150: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5148: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5149: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 144 of 513

07/13/1994 07/13/1994
07/13/1994 07/14/1994 07/15/1994 07/15/1994 07/19/1994 07/19/1994 07/19/1994 07/20/1994 07/20/1994 07/20/1994 07/20/1994 07/21/1994
07/21/1994 07/21/1994 07/21/1994 07/22/1994 07/22/1994 07/22/1994 07/26/1994

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5147: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

5156 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenane Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

5157 MOTION SUBMITTING application for permission to employ Daniela and Michael Thompson as assistant monitors, by Vincent Nathan. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1994)

5158 282nd REPORT OF THE COURT MONITOR − 184th REPORT RE:OVERCROWDING (il) (Entered: 07/15/1994)

5159 Seventy−Fourth Report for the month of June, l994 from gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/15/1994)

5160 FIFTH REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5161 MOTION by Felix and Justo Torres Garcia to request order for detention center to investigate prison conditions (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5162 Letter MOTION to Amend parties in complaint (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5163 Letter MOTION by Felix and Justo Torres to request order for injunction (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5l56: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5l57: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5l55: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5l59: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5164

ORDER The Clerk shall issue to Jose Fernandez Sein a check in the amt of $16,264. corresponding to fees and expenses claimed for June, July and August, l992. The Clerk shall also issue a check to Jose Fernandez Sein in the amt of $40,544.20 in his capacity as representative of the estate of Harvey B. Nachman for the fees and expenses claimed by Mr. Nachman for the months of June, July, August and Sept. l992. Defts are ordered to deposit with the Court within 10 days the sum of $1,226,328.69, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5165 SIXTY−FOURTH Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5166 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT INVOICE for the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5167 ANSWER by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (Attorney Jay A. Garcia ) to fifth amended complaint (il) (Entered: 07/22/1994)

5168 283rd REPORT of the Court Monitor − l85th Report re: Overcrowding (il) (Entered: 07/26/1994)

5169 284th REPORT of the Court Monitor − l86th Report re: Overcrowding (il) (Entered: 07/26/1994)

5170 285th REPORT of the Court Monitor − l87th Report re: Overcrowding (il) (Entered: 07/26/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5l65: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/27/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 145 of 513

07/26/1994 07/27/1994 07/27/1994 07/27/1994
07/27/1994
07/27/1994
07/29/1994 07/29/1994
08/01/1994 08/01/1994 08/01/1994 08/01/1994 08/01/1994 08/01/1994 08/01/1994 08/01/1994 08/02/1994 08/03/1994 08/03/1994 08/03/1994
08/03/1994
08/03/1994

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5l66: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/27/1994)
5171 Submission of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for June, l994 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 07/28/1994)
5172 Submission of Reviewed Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ending March, 31, l994 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 07/28/1994)
5173 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay invoice #2051 in the amt of $2,125. to Vila del Corral covering the services for the month of May, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/28/1994)
5174 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay invoice #2052 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila del Corral and Co. covering expenses during the month of June, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/28/1994)
5175 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay the amt of $6,791.56 to atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of June, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/28/1994)
5176 Informative Motion by Jose E. Fernandez Sein re: order regarding objections to atty fee applications. (il) (Entered: 08/01/1994)
5183 MOTION informing the Court that atty fees for the month of March, l994 in the amt of $4,942.40 for atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein were not paid. (il) (Entered: 08/03/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5172: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5171: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/02/1994)
5177 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $3,875. for atty Luis M. Villaronga for the month of July, l994. (il) (Entered: 08/02/1994)
5178 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $2,181.40 for atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of July, l994. (il) (Entered: 08/02/1994)
5179 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses in the amt of $72,321.38 for the month of July, l994, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 08/02/1994)
5180 MOTION SUBMITTING QUARTERLY FOOD SERVICE AUDITS AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN W/ATTACHS. (il) (Entered: 08/02/1994)
5181 ORDER Civil Case #94−1936 (PG) is ordered consolidated with this case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1994)
5182 ORDER Civil Case 94−1947(PG) is consolidated into this case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1994)
5184 MOTION submitting unpaid requests for attys fees for the months of March, l993, April through June, l994 for atty Luis M. Villaronga. (il) (Entered: 08/03/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5176: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5180: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1994)
5185 ORDER Contingent no objection the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $72,321.38 covering the month of July, 1994 is approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1994)
5186 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to advance Atty Jeffrey M. Williams the sum of $81.40 for fees earned during the month of July, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1994)
5187 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to advance to Atty Luis M. Villaronga the sum of $3,875. for fees earned during the month of July, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 146 of 513

08/03/1994 08/03/1994 08/04/1994 08/04/1994 08/05/1994 08/05/1994 08/05/1994 08/05/1994 08/05/1994 08/05/1994 08/05/1994 08/05/1994 08/08/1994
08/09/1994 08/09/1994 08/09/1994 08/09/1994 08/09/1994 08/09/1994

Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1994)
5188 Letter MOTION by Rafael Ramos Ortiz to request order for copies of documents (il) (Entered: 08/04/1994)
5189 MOTION by Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon to request order pltfs to notify them of the amended complaint . (il) (Entered: 08/04/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482293 in the amt of $3,750. payable to Vila del Corral covering invoices of May and June, l994. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482294 in the amt of $6,791.56 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez covering expenses during the month of June, l994. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5190 MOTION by Nora L. Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,920.00 for expenses during the month of July, l994 (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5191 MOTION by Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,106.25 for expenses during the month of July, l994 (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5192 MOTION by Bruce J. McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $8,584.45 for expenses during the month of July, l994. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5193 MOTION by Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $7,227.96 for expenses during the month of July, l994 (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5194 MOTION by Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,648.27 for expenses during the month of July, 1994. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5195 MOTION SUBMITTING Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for Morales Feliciano Account by Vincent M. Nathan (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5196 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein the sum of $4,942.00 for fees earned during the month of March, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5197 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay Atty Luis M. Villaronga the sum of $30,031.25 for fees earned during February, March, April and May, l993. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1994)
5198 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 9/22/94 to deposit with the Court the sum of $1,226,328.69 purs to order of 2−21−91 establishing the Special Fund for Payment of Pltfs Atty fees and expenses on a regular basis. (il) (Entered: 08/09/1994)
5199 MOTION NOTIFYING AMENDMENT to Interagency Agreement among Administration of Correction, Department of Health and the Department of Drug Addiction Services w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 08/09/1994)
5200 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,581.47 to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/09/1994)
5201 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $8,584.45 payable to atty Bruce J. McGiverin covering expenses during the month of July, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/09/1994)
5202 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,106.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of July, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/09/1994)
5203 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,648.27 payable to Atty Harry Anduze Montano for expenses during the month of July, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/09/1994)
5204 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,227.96 payable to atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of July, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/09/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 147 of 513

08/10/1994 08/10/1994
08/10/1994 08/10/1994 08/11/1994
08/11/1994
08/11/1994
08/11/1994 08/11/1994 08/11/1994 08/12/1994 08/12/1994 08/12/1994 08/12/1994 08/12/1994 08/12/1994 08/12/1994 08/15/1994
08/15/1994 08/15/1994
08/15/1994
08/16/1994

5205 75th REPORT by Defendant−All (su) (Entered: 08/12/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECKS #482353 in the amt of $4,942.40; #482328 in the amt of $16,264, and #482327 in the amt of $40,544.20 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #482355 in the amt of $81.40 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482356 in the amt of $3,875 payable to Luis M. Villaronga, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
5206 OPINION AND ORDER payment of fees to Mr. Jeffrey Williams for the month of July 1994 in the amt $2,100.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (su) (Entered: 08/12/1994)
5207 ORDER that Nora L. Rodriguez−Matias, Esq. is entitled to an advancement of $1,920.00 in fees for the month of July 1994 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (su) (Entered: 08/12/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on mot #5198 granting extention until 09/22/94 to deposit the amt of $1,226,328.69 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (su) (Entered: 08/12/1994)
5208 MOTION by Government Defendants to Extend Time 06/26/94 for Pilot Roster Management System (su) (Entered: 08/12/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER re: dkt #5195: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (su) (Entered: 08/12/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on mot #5199: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (su) (Entered: 08/12/1994)
5209 SUBMISSION of notice of appointment of Pre−Trial Services Development Committe by Vincent M. Nathan. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482431 in the amt of $30,031.25 payable to Luis M. Villaronga, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482432 in the amt of $7,227.96 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482433 in the amt of $1,648.27 payable to Harry Anduze, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482434 in the amt of $4,106.25 payable to Rachel Brill, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482435 in the amt of $8,584.45 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482436 in the amt of $22,581.47 payable to Hogares Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [5208−1] motion to Extend Time 06/26/94 for Pilot Roster Management System Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [5205−1] 75th report Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
5210 ORDER that the Court Monitor shall issue a check in the amt of $22,379.07 payable to Steve J. Martin ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
5211 APPLICATION by Vincent M. Nathan requesting order to defts to deposit funds in the amt of $1,000,000 to replenish the fund established by the Court for payment of the fees and expenses incurred by the court monitor, etc. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)
5212 SIXTH REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug users under the auspices of the Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 148 of 513

08/16/1994 08/16/1994 08/16/1994 08/16/1994 08/16/1994 08/16/1994 08/17/1994 08/17/1994 08/19/1994 08/19/1994 08/19/1994 08/22/1994
08/22/1994 08/23/1994 08/23/1994
08/23/1994 08/23/1994 08/23/1994 08/23/1994

5213 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Compel defts to comply w/the court approved stipulation regarding the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)

5214 MOTION notifying deposit of $9,120,000 and identity of segregated accounts regarding the Facilities Rehabilitation Program by govt Defendants. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)

5215 Informative Motion by govt Defendants re: complementing deft's 7/7/94 designation motion. Requesting approval of the proposed designation of Rosser Int'l, Inc. as the new Program Manager of the FRP. (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482512 in the amt of $2,100 payable to Jeffrey Williams, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

5216 SIXTH REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of drug users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482513 in the amt of $1,920 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez, Esq. (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [5189−1] motion to request order pltfs to notify them of the amended complaint . ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/17/1994)

5217 MOTION SUBMITTING English transl of quarterly food service audits and corrective action plans by govt Defendants. (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

5218 MOTION by Otto Riefkohl for Charles S. Fax and Luis Guinot, Jr. to Appear Pro Hac Vice (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

5219 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Otto Riefkohl by counsel Luis Guinot, Jr. and Charles S. Fax. (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

5223 ORDER consolidating this case with Civ. 94−1946 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)

5220

ORDER approving Rosser as the Program Manager for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program. The Court will not resolve the other matters raised in the parties' pending motions. Each party will have 10 days from the date of this order to file any response or opp to such other matters. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

5221 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: use of additional cell space for admission purposes. (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

TRANSFER OF FUNDS of EBP, Banco Central Hispano Acct #501000033 in the amt of $115,502.61 for operating expenses for Sep−Oct 1994 (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

5222 ORDER the Clerk of the Court to pay Banco Santander the amt of $625 covering amount due on investment transaction of 9/18/91 and custody fees for years 1992, 1993, and from Jan to June of 1994 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #482633 in the amt of $625 payable to Banco Santander de P.R. (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER [5215−1] motion information Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER [5214−1] notice Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [5211−1] motion requesting order to defts to deposit funds in the amt of $1,000,000 to replenish the fund established by the Court for payment of the fees and expenses incurred by the court monitor, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/23/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 149 of 513

08/23/1994 08/23/1994 08/24/1994 08/24/1994 08/24/1994 08/25/1994 08/29/1994 08/30/1994 08/30/1994 08/30/1994 08/31/1994 08/31/1994 08/31/1994 09/01/1994
09/01/1994 09/01/1994 09/01/1994 09/01/1994 09/01/1994 09/01/1994

5224 Informative Motion by EBP re: invoice of July 1994 in the amt of $66,118.21. (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)
5225 SIXTY FIFTH financial Report by EBP re: month of July 1994. (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)
5226 ORDER admitting pro hac vice counsel Luis Guinot, Jr. and Charles S. Fax for the Administration of Corrections ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [5221−1] motion information Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)
5227 Letter MOTION by Martin Gonzalez Acevedo, pro−se in Spanish language requesting a list of counsel and addresses (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)
5228 MOTION SUBMITTING exhibit to mot submission of notice of apptment of Pre−trial Services Development Committe, #5509 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)
5229 Letter MOTION by Jorge L. Cruz Rivera, pro−se in Spanish language inmate is not allowed to work at the prison and is req action from this Court (np) (Entered: 08/30/1994)
5230 287th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 188th report (overcrowding) w/ exh D. (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5231 288th Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: 189th report (overcrowding) w/exh D. (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5232 LETTER/MOTION by Roberto Gonzalez−Cruz,pro−se requesting status of Civ. 94−1936 (PG) (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5233 SUBMISSION of accounting of expenditures of fine monies for Jul 1994 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5234 MOTION SUBMITTING program manager agreement to the Court by govt Defendants. (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5235 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to inf motion complementing deft's 7/7/94 designating mot, #5215, filed by defts. (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5236 ORDER approving the 6th report of the program for the rehabilitation of drug users under the Auspices of Hogar Crea, Inc. The Clerk of the Court is to issue a check in the amt of $22,403.44 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5237 ANNUAL Report by Vincent M. Nathan re: activities of the Health Care Executive Committee. (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5238 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time for 10 days to respond to order approving program manager for facilities rehabilitation program (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5239 MOTION SUBMITTING stipulations by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez, Zoraida Buxo, Carmen Feliciano, Otto Riefkohl (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5240 STIPULATION regarding classification by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez, Zoraida Buxo, Carmen Feliciano, Otto Riefkohl . (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5241 STIPULATION regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez, Zoraida Buxo, Carmen Feliciano, Otto Riefkohl . (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5242 STIPULATION regarding security by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez, Zoraida Buxo, Carmen Feliciano, Otto Riefkohl . (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 150 of 513

09/01/1994 09/01/1994 09/01/1994 09/02/1994 09/02/1994 09/02/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994
09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994
09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/06/1994 09/07/1994

ENDORSED ORDER [5228−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [5224−1] motion information Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER [5225−1] Sixth fifth report Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 09/02/1994)
5243 MOTION by Jose E. Fernandez Sein for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,422.50 for fees during the month of August, l994 (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5244 RECOMMENDATION of the Court Monitor regarding defts' Population Projection Plan. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5245 MOTION by Atty Luis M. Villaronga for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,687.50 for expenses during the month of August, 1994 (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5246 MOTION by Atty Bruce McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,466.71 for expenses during the month of August, 1994. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5247 MOTION by Atty Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $10,200. for expenses during the month of August, 1994. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5248 Informative Motion by Gov't defts. re: plans designating the location of Regional Intake Centers and for the Construction of Segregation Cells. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5249 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses for the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5250 MOTION by Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,077.50 for expenses during the month of August, 1994. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5251 MOTION SUBMITTING Organizational Plan by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5252 MOTION by Atty Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $24,374.29 for expenses during the month of August, 1994. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5253 MOTION by Atty Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,088.57 for expenses during the month of August, 1994. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5238: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5254 ORDER Contingent on no objection, the Court grants the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses submitted by the Court Monitor for expenses during the month of August, l994 in the amt of $262,879.12. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5233: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5235: Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5234: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5229: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5239: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/07/1994)
5255 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a from the fine fund in the amt of $24,374.29 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of August, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/08/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 151 of 513

09/07/1994 09/07/1994 09/07/1994 09/08/1994 09/08/1994 09/08/1994 09/08/1994 09/12/1994 09/12/1994 09/12/1994 09/12/1994 09/12/1994 09/12/1994 09/12/1994 09/13/1994
09/14/1994 09/14/1994 09/14/1994 09/14/1994

5256 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,088.57 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/08/1994)
5257 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $17,378.71 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of August, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/08/1994)
5258 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $10,200. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of August, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/08/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5248: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5251: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/09/1994)
5259 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,077.50 for atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of August, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/09/1994)
5260 MOTION by Atty Jeffrey Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,785.90 for expenses during the month of August, 1994. (il) (Entered: 09/09/1994)
5261 SEVENTY−SIXTH report for the month of August, l994 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/13/1994)
5262 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez regarding results of study of a revised classification instrument (il) (Entered: 09/14/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491866 in the amt of $10,200. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491867 in the amt of $24,374.29 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491868 in the amt of $17,378.71 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491869 in the amt of $2,088.57 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/16/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 491870 in the amt of $2,077.50 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/16/1994)
5263 ORDER Approving joint mot to submit stipulations, provisionally approving stipulations regarding custodial and socio−penal staffing, security, and classification, and directing parties to file joint form of notice to class members. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/14/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491881 in the amt of $22,403.44 payable to Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
5264 MOTION regarding Roster Management and Pilot Roster by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
5265 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,785.90 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of August, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
5266 ORDER Vacating order of 9−6−94, denying pltfs reply to defts information mot complementing defts July 7, l994 designating mot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 152 of 513

09/14/1994 09/14/1994 09/14/1994 09/15/1994 09/16/1994 09/16/1994 09/16/1994 09/16/1994 09/16/1994 09/16/1994 09/16/1994 09/16/1994 09/19/1994 09/19/1994 09/20/1994 09/20/1994 09/21/1994 09/21/1994 09/21/1994
09/23/1994

5267 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,422.50 to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of August, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
5268 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,687.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of August, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
5269 SEVENTH REPORT of the Program for Rehabilitation of Drug Users Under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 09/15/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5261: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/16/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5262: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/19/1994)
5270 MOTION to designate selected roster management system, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1994)
5271 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: staffing stipulation items 37 and 40. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1994)
5272 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: item 59 of the staffing stipulation. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1994)
5273 JOINT MOT filing use of Force Regulations regarding item 23 of the Security Stipulation, by pltfs and defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491941 in the amt of $2,785.90 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491940 in the amt of $2,422.50 payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #491942 in the amt of $3,687.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5264: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/21/1994)
5274 Pltfs reply to defts' mot submitting program manager agreement to the Court. (il) (Entered: 09/21/1994)
5275 Designation of Alternate Lead Counsel by Atty Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 09/21/1994)
5276 Defts' opposition to pltfs mot to compel as amended by pltfs reply to defts' informative mot complementing defts' July 7, l994 designating mot. (il) (Entered: 09/21/1994)
5277 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time until 10/15/94 to file memorandum (il) (Entered: 09/22/1994)
5278 ORDER directing pltfs counsel and the Court Monitor to submit comments regarding the Administration of Correction's Organizational plan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1994)
5279 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625.00 for invoice #2245 and for $l,875.00 for invoice #2246 payable to Vila del Corral for expenses during the months of July and August, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1994)
5280 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re item 31 of the staffing stipulation (il) (Entered: 09/27/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 153 of 513

09/23/1994 09/26/1994
09/26/1994 09/26/1994 09/26/1994
09/26/1994
09/27/1994 09/27/1994 09/27/1994 09/27/1994 09/27/1994 09/27/1994 09/27/1994 09/29/1994
09/29/1994 09/29/1994
09/29/1994 09/29/1994 09/29/1994 09/29/1994 09/29/1994 09/30/1994

COPY of check#00837−2508 in the amt of $28.20 deposited by Smith Barney. (il) (Entered: 09/27/1994)
5281 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 10−5−94 to deposit with the Court the two different payments identified in paragraph 1 and 2. (il) (Entered: 09/27/1994)
5282 INFORMATION mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's August, l994 invoice. (il) (Entered: 09/27/1994)
5283 SIXTY−SIXTH Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 09/27/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK# 492089 in the amt of $3,500. payable to Vila del Corral and Company for invoices during the month of July and August, l994. (il) (Entered: 09/27/1994)
5284 MOTION SUBMITTING Correctional Health Official's Semi−Annual Reports by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 09/27/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5277: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5271: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5272: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1994)
5285 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Amend order dtd 9−20−94 (il) (Entered: 09/28/1994)
5286 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Leave to File reply to defts oppos mot dtd 9−20−94 w/reply tendered attached. (il) (Entered: 09/28/1994)
5287 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano regarding defts failure to comply with paragraphs 9, 10 and 11 of the FRP stipulation (il) (Entered: 09/28/1994)
5288 ORDER, Consolidating Case Civ. 94−1935 with Civ 79−4 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/1994)
5289 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez submitting Deposit of funds for OCM in the amt of $1,000,000. (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
5290 APPLICATION for Approval of the Revised Manuel of Policy and Procedures of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5280: The Court will wait to hear from pltfs counsel before taking any action as to the req to find defts in compliance with item 31 of the Sept. l, 1994 Staffing Stipulation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5281: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5284: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5283: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5282: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5275: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
5291 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to request approval of appointment by Governor of PR of a Facilities renovation

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 154 of 513

09/30/1994 09/30/1994
09/30/1994 09/30/1994 10/03/1994 10/03/1994 10/03/1994
10/03/1994 10/03/1994 10/03/1994 10/03/1994 10/04/1994 10/04/1994 10/04/1994 10/04/1994 10/04/1994
10/04/1994 10/04/1994 10/05/1994

Program Director and Partial Compensation from Fine Fund Money (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5291: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
5292 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to request approval of appointment by the Governor of PR of a Correctional compliance Coordinator and Partial Compensation from Fine Fund Money (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5292: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1994)
5293 JOINT mot in compliance w/Order dtd 9−13−94, by pts. (il) (Entered: 10/03/1994)
5294 MOTION by Atty Luis M. Villaronga for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,343.75 for the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1994)
5295 MOTION SUBMITTING Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req. for ext of time to file English translations by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1994)
5296 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req for ext of time to file English translations by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1994)
5297 MOTION complying with items 25 and 52 of the Staffing Stipulation and with item 4 of the Classification Stipulation, by gov't defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1994)
5298 MOTION by Atty Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $ 13,288.13 for expenses during the month September, 1994 (il) (Entered: 10/04/1994)
5299 MOTION by Atty Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $431.25 for expenses during the month of September, 1994 (il) (Entered: 10/04/1994)
5300 MOTION by Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $11,516.69 for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1994)
5301 MOTION SUBMITTING payment for pltfs attys fees in the amt of $1,226,328.69 receipt#73865 w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/05/1994)
5302 SUBMISSION of Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for August, 1994, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 10/05/1994)
5303 APPLICATION for employment of Expert Consultant William Dallman, by Court Reporter. (il) (Entered: 10/05/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5285 Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1994)
5304 ORDER Concerning Roster Management System. The Court Monitor will submit a report by 11−1−94 identifying the extent and scope of defts proposed deviations from earlier approved roster management practices, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1994)
5305 ORDER Regarding the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (FRP) Associate Program Manager and Account Balance Reports. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1994)
5306 ORDER The Court Monitor will monitor and determine the state of defts' compliance with the procedures set forth in their Sept. 16, 1994 mot., etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5289: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 155 of 513

10/05/1994 10/05/1994 10/05/1994
10/05/1994 10/05/1994 10/05/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994
10/06/1994
10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994 10/06/1994

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5293: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5307 MOTION by Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,262.96 for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5308 MOTION SUBMITTING exhb. 1, a plan for the implementation of intermediate sanctions that will reduce the pressure for expensive prision construction by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5309 MOTION by Atty Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,535.76 for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5310 289TH REPORT of the Court Monitor − 109th Report re Overcrowding w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5297: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5311 Nomination of Ivette Colon Torres to serve as Acting Executive Director of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5312 Nomination of Gerardo Rivera Fourquet to serve as Deputy Monitor. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5313 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $11,516.69 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for atty expenses during the month of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5314 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $431.25 payable to Rachel Brill for atty expenses during the month of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5315 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $13,288.13 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5316 ORDER Approving ext of employment of Administrative Assistant Maria del Carmen Arteta to the Special Advisory Committee. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5317 ORDER Approving and directing distribution of Notice to Class Members. A hrg will be set for 11−22−94 at 4:00PM to consider objections filed by members of the class, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 11/23/1994 (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5318 ORDER Appointing Gerardo Rivera as Deputy Court Monitor, approving the nomination of Ivette Colon Torres as Acting Executive Director of the Expedited Bail Project and directing payment to outgoing Executive Director. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5319 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall issue a check in the amt of $22,736.16 to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5303: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5302: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5301: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5320 ORDER Approving the defts' mot submitting Plan for Population Projections. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5321 MOTION by Atty Nora Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,595.00 for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 156 of 513

10/06/1994 10/07/1994 10/07/1994
10/07/1994 10/07/1994 10/12/1994 10/12/1994 10/12/1994 10/13/1994 10/13/1994 10/13/1994 10/13/1994 10/14/1994 10/14/1994 10/14/1994 10/17/1994 10/17/1994 10/17/1994 10/18/1994

5322 ITEMIZED Statement of Monitors' Time and Expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1994)
5323 MOTION concerning defts' designation of Roster Management System, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 10/11/1994)
5324 MOTION SUBMITTING translations of the Revised Stipulation, Stipulation regarding the Facilities Rehabilitation Project, Stipulation regarding Classification, Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Social Penal Staffing and Stipulation regarding Security by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 10/11/1994)
5325 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall issue a check in the amt of $2,535.87 payable to Atty Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte ) (il) (Entered: 10/11/1994)
5326 ORDER Approving the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $114,257.51 submitted by Court Monitors covering the period of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte ) (il) (Entered: 10/11/1994)
5327 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,262.96 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte ) (il) (Entered: 10/13/1994)
5328 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,343.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte ) (il) (Entered: 10/13/1994)
5329 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,595.00 payable to Atty Nora Rodriguez for expenses during the month of September, 1994. ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte ) (il) (Entered: 10/13/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #492551 payable to Atty Rachel Brill in the amt of $431.25 for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/13/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #492552 in the amt of $13,288.13 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/13/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #492554 in the amt of $22,736.16 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 10/13/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 492553 in the amt of $11,516.69 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/13/1994)
5330 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez submitting First Quarterly Accounting Report for the 1994−95 Fiscal Year for the Ponce Pilot Project (il) (Entered: 10/17/1994)
5331 EIGHT REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1994)
5332 Letter MOTION by Raul Ortiz Casillas to request order for transfer from PR to US (il) (Entered: 10/17/1994)
5333 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to comply with Court order regarding atty fees (il) (Entered: 10/18/1994)
5334 Letter MOTION by Asoc. Confinados Adultos Y Envejecientes to request order copy of complaint be furnished to them (il) (Entered: 10/18/1994)
5335 MOTION in compliance with Item 7 of the Security Stipulation, Items 10 and 13 of the Staffing Stipulation and Items 10, 11 and 20 of the Classification Stipulation by defts., w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/18/1994)
5336 Letter MOTION in the Spanish language by various confined females req. information regarding revised stipulation (il) (Entered: 10/20/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 157 of 513

10/19/1994 10/19/1994 10/19/1994 10/20/1994
10/21/1994
10/21/1994
10/21/1994
10/21/1994
10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994 10/21/1994
10/24/1994
10/24/1994 10/25/1994 10/25/1994

5337 APPLICATION for amendment to Revised Manual of Policy and Procedures of the Expedited Bail Project by Gerardo J. Rivera. (il) (Entered: 10/20/1994)
5338 INVOICE of the Expedited Bail Project's operating expenses for the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/20/1994)
5339 SIXTY SEVENTH Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 10/20/1994)
5340 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Respondent is ordered to appear and show cause why petitioner's req should not be granted, etc., as stated herein. Show Cause Hearing set for 10:00 10/31/94 ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte ) (il) (Entered: 10/26/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #497511 in the amt of $1,262.96 payable to Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #497510 in the amt of $2,535.87 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
COPY OF TRANSFER SLIP in the amt of $115,502.61 from Banco Central Hispano Acct. # 501−00001−7 to Banco Central Hispano Acct. # 501−00003−3. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #497512 in the amt of $2,595. payable to Atty Nora Rodriguez for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5337: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5331: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5338: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5339: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5330: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5324: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5308: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5335: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1994)
5341 Minute entry:, reset Show Cause Hearing for 10:00 10/25/94 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/26/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #497508 in the amt of $1,343.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #497569 in the amt of $1,000,000. payable to Center of the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) Modified on 10/26/1994 (Entered: 10/25/1994)
5342 Letter MOTION by Rafael Ramos violation of civil rights (il) (Entered: 10/26/1994)
5343 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Preliminary Injunction , and/or for Temporary Restraining Order (il) (Entered: 10/26/1994)
5344 MOTION SUBMITTING recommendations of The Health Care Executive Committee by Vincent M. Nathan (il) (Entered: 10/26/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 158 of 513

10/25/1994 10/25/1994 10/25/1994
10/26/1994 10/26/1994 10/26/1994 10/26/1994
10/27/1994
10/27/1994 10/28/1994
10/28/1994 10/28/1994 10/28/1994
10/28/1994 10/28/1994 10/28/1994 10/28/1994
10/31/1994 10/31/1994 10/31/1994
10/31/1994

5345 Letter MOTION by Victor James violation of civil rights (il) (Entered: 10/26/1994)
5346 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez for Jay A. Garcia to Withdraw as Attorney (il) (Entered: 10/26/1994)
5368 Minute entry: Meeting in chambers. Pts informed status of case. Hrg on TRO will be held tomorrow at 2:00PM with the understanding that the TRO expires on Sunday, Oct. 30,1994. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5347 MOTION by Prairie Correctional to Dismiss for clear lack of jurisdiction (il) (Entered: 10/27/1994)
5348 MOTION by Prairie Correctional for Thomas B. Heffelfinger to Appear Pro Hac Vice (il) (Entered: 10/27/1994)
5349 Letter MOTION by Fernando Garcia Marquez re civil rights violation (il) (Entered: 10/27/1994)
5350 Minute entry: Meeting held in chambers. An agreement was reached regarding the TRO. An order will be issued accordingly. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5351 MOTION SUBMITTING Staffing Patterns and Statements by defts that a corresponding complement of Correctional Officers has been assigned by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5369 Letter MOTION by Luis Oliveras req. periodic visits from attys handling this case (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5352 MOTION SUBMITTING translation of documents (see dkt#5351) by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5353 COPY of stipulation of classification issued by State Penitentiary regarding Howard Santiago Vazquez. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5354 MOTION in support of amendments to the Manual of Policy and Procedures of the Expedited Bail Project w/attachs., by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5355 ORDER Approving defts' mot seeking modification of criteria for provision of bail by the Expedited Bail Project. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5346: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5343: Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5370 ORDER The agreement attached is noted and the TRO is vacated, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5400 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Withdraw [5343−1] motion for Preliminary Injunction by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, [5343−2] motion for Temporary Restraining Order by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)
5356 MOTION in compliance w/Item 23 of the Security Stipulation and Items 33 and 18 of the Staffing Stipulation. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5357 MOTION in compliance with Item III C.2 of the Revised Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5358 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of Quarterly Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)
5359 SEVENTY−SEVENTH REPORT purs to April 28, l988 Court Order. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 159 of 513

10/31/1994
10/31/1994 10/31/1994 10/31/1994 11/01/1994 11/01/1994 11/01/1994 11/01/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994 11/02/1994
11/03/1994

5360 MOTION SUBMITTING Staffing Patterns and a Statement by defts that a corresponding complement of Correctional Officers have been assigned by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5361 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5362 MOTION SUBMITTING Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for the Morales Feliciano Account by Vincent M. Nathan w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5363 MOTION SUBMITTING Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses during the month of October, 1994 by Vincent M. Nathan (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5364 COMMENTS on defts' Proposed Organizational Plan by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5365 290th REPORT of the Court Monitor − Report Explaining defts' Selected Roster Management System and Submitting the Court Monitor's Recommendations w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5366 MOTION in compliance w/Court Order of 9−20−94 with respect to the filing of an AOC Organizational Plan by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5367 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time to file objection to attys fees. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1994)

5371 Letter MOTION by Mariano Maldonado violation of civil rights (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5372 MOTION by Modesto Crisoptino objecting to the most recent stipulations in this case (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5373 Letter MOTION by Modesto Crisoptimo objecting to all stipulations filed in this case (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5374 MOTION by MAximiliano Amparo Concepcion objecting to stipulations filed in case (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5375 MOTION by Atty Jose E. Fernandez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,984. for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5376 ORDER Regarding defts' submissions concerning the Facilities Rehabilitation Program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5377 ORDER Approving the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $233,286.10 covering the period of October, 1994 by Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5378 MOTION SUBMITTING Financial Statements and Supplementary Information by Vila Del Corral and Co. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5379 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: FRP Emergency Bed Certification. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5380 Letter MOTION by Efrain Ortiz Stipulations filed in this case (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5381

Letter MOTION by A. Rodriguez, J. Diaz, I. Correa, J. Miranda, C. Medina, D. Medina, S. Facundo, F. Cano, A. Roman, G. Rodriguez, R. Rivera, L. Lopez, R. Alvarado, J. Sanchez, D. Rodriguez, C. Ayala, C. Cotto, A. Cruz, J. Rivera, M. Orengo, A. Benitez and C. Pizarro stipulations filed in this case (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

5382 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano defts' failure to comply with paragraphs 20 and 22 of the stipulation regarding classification (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 160 of 513

11/03/1994 11/03/1994 11/03/1994 11/03/1994 11/03/1994
11/04/1994 11/04/1994
11/04/1994 11/07/1994
11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994

5383 MOTION by Atty Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,543.75 for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5384 MOTION by Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $10,017.70 for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5385 Letter MOTION by Modesto Crisoptimo req. all stipulations filed in this case (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5386 MOTION by Atty Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,968.02 for expenses during the month of October, 1994 (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5387 MOTION SUBMITTING English translations of Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5388 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $21,556.95 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5389 MOTION by Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt of $4,085.49 for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) Modified on 11/07/1994 (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5390 MOTION by Atty Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $13,333.53 for expenses during the month of October, 1994 (il) (Entered: 11/07/1994)
5391 MOTION SUBMITTING English translation of Revised Manual of Policy and Procedures of the Expedited Bail Project by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5382: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5379: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5366: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5362: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5361: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5359: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5358: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5357 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5356: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5352: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5387: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/09/1994)
5392 291st Report of the Court Monitor − First Report purs to Paragraphs III B 1−4 of the Revised Stipulation w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)
5393 MOTION by Atty Nora Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,666.50 for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 161 of 513

11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/08/1994 11/09/1994 11/09/1994 11/09/1994
11/10/1994
11/10/1994 11/10/1994 11/14/1994 11/14/1994

5394 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,543.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of October, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5395 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $10,017.70 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5396 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt off $2,984. payable to Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of October, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5397 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $13,333.53 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of October, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5398 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,085.49 payable to Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of October, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5399 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,968.02 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of October, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5400: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5360: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5363: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5367: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 11/21/1994 (Entered: 11/10/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5351: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5401 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor to extend funding for the Sistema de Educacion Externa Program at the Administration of Correction Penal Institutions. (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5402 RECOMMENDATION OF THE Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor to use Fine funds to pay tuition and material for inmates enrolled in the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute's Garment Manufacturing Workshop at the Ponce and Rio Piedras Complexes. (il) (Entered: 11/10/1994)

5403

ORDER Approving the 291st Report. Defts shall pay to the Clerk of this Court the sum of $1,495,600. as a sanction for continuing contempt of this Court's orders relating to unconstitutional crowding. This payment is to be deposited within 14 days. The Clerk shall deposit the monies in the segregated account established by Court's order of Aug. 14, 1987, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)

5404 ORDER requiring submission of Revised Organizational Plan within 30 days, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)

5405 MOTION SUBMITTING certification of distribution of notice to class members by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5333: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5348: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 162 of 513

11/14/1994 11/14/1994 11/14/1994 11/14/1994 11/14/1994
11/14/1994 11/14/1994 11/14/1994 11/14/1994 11/14/1994
11/14/1994
11/14/1994
11/15/1994
11/15/1994 11/18/1994
11/18/1994 11/18/1994 11/21/1994
11/22/1994
11/22/1994 11/22/1994

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5401: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5402: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5391: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5406 ORDER Approving Revised Manual of Policies and Procedures of the Expedited Bail Project. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5407 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,666.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for attys fees during the month of October, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5353: Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 497995 in the amt of $21,556.95 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 498002 in the amt of $1,968.02 payable to Atty Harry Anduze. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 497994 in the amt of $4,085.49 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #497998 in the amt of $13,333.53 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 497996 in the amt of $4,543.75 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 497997 in the amt of $10,017.70 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5408 MOTION SUBMITTING training schedule in compliance w/Item 19 of the Staffing Stipulation by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5409 NINTH REPORT of the Program for Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5410 ORDER Approving the use of Fine Funds for the Sistema de Educacion Universitaria Externa (SEDUE) Program for l994−l995 Academic Year. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5411 INVOICE of the Expedited Bail Project's operating expenses in the amt of $60,622.45 during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5412 SIXTY−EIGHTH Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 11/21/1994)
5413 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 11/29/94 to submit amendment no. 3 of the FRP Program Management Agreement (il) (Entered: 11/22/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #498003 in the amt of $2,984. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 11/23/1994)
5414 MOTION SUBMITTING summary of objections by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (il) (Entered: 11/23/1994)
5415 Minute entry: Hrg on objections by the members of the class to the 5 pending stipulations called. Pts are to file their reactions to the reports from the Monitor or

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 163 of 513

11/23/1994
11/23/1994 11/23/1994
11/28/1994 11/28/1994 11/28/1994 11/28/1994 11/28/1994 11/28/1994 11/30/1994 12/01/1994
12/01/1994 12/01/1994
12/02/1994 12/02/1994 12/05/1994 12/05/1994 12/05/1994 12/05/1994
12/05/1994

the Court will proceed to adopt the observations and objections by Monitor, etc., as stated herein. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
5416 MOTION SUBMITTING payment of fines in the amt of $1,495,600. by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
5417 FIFTH QUARTERLY REPORT of the Health Care Executive Committee, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
5418 MOTION SUBMITTING Master Plan for Regional Pretrial Status Centers, Sentenced Diagnostics and Classification Centers, & Short & Long Term Segregation Units by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5408: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5412: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5411: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5405: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5413: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
5419 SUBMISSION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for September and October, l994 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
5420 MOTION IN Compliance with Items l and 9 of the Security Stipulation and Items 1, 26 and 27 of the Staffing Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #498322 in the amt of $1,666.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5414: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
5421 ORDER The 290th Report of the Court Monitor is confirmed. All changes and additions are approved. Defts shall prepare a revised version of the Plan and include changes stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/02/1994)
5422 Letter MOTION by Jose Manuel Delgado−Torres re food menu at prison (il) (Entered: 12/06/1994)
5424 Letter MOTIONS filed by various inmates objecting to all stipulations filed in case (il) (Entered: 12/06/1994)
5423 MOTION by Atty Jeffrey Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,193.50 for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1994)
5425 MOTION by Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,093. for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1994)
5426 MOTION by Atty Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,088.57 for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1994)
5427 ORDER Granting ext of time to object to the 291st report of the Court Monitor, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/06/1994)
5428 ORDER Noting and Accepting Court Monitor's Submission of Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for September and October, 1994. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 164 of 513

12/05/1994 12/06/1994 12/06/1994 12/06/1994 12/06/1994 12/06/1994 12/06/1994 12/07/1994 12/07/1994 12/08/1994 12/08/1994 12/09/1994
12/09/1994 12/12/1994 12/13/1994 12/13/1994
12/13/1994 12/13/1994 12/13/1994

5429 ORDER Approving stipulations regarding Security, S taffing, FRP, Classification and other matters. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

5430 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,088.57 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

5431 MOTION by Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $9,417.30 for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

5432 MOTION by Atty Steve J. Martin for Expert Fees in the amt of $19,870.98 for expenses from July 1st thru October, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

5433 MOTION by Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $7,384. for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

5434 MOTION by Atty Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,156.25 for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

5435 292nd REPORT of the Court Monitor −− 191st and Final Report re: Overcrowding w/Attachs. (il) (Entered: 12/07/1994)

5436 MOTION by Jose E. Fernandez Sein for Attorney Fees in the amt of $452.50 for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/09/1994)

5437 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses for the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/09/1994)

5438 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano re civil rights violation (il) (Entered: 12/09/1994)

5439 Letter MOTION by Raymond Rivera−Rios for Appointment of Counsel (il) (Entered: 12/09/1994)

5440

SUPPLEMENTAL Recommendation of the Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor to use Fine Funds to pay tuition and materials for inmates enrolled in the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute's Garment Manufacturing Workshop at the Ponce and Rio Piedras Penitentiary Complexes. (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

5441 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 12/14/94 to file Organizational Plan (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

5442 MOTION by Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Isabel Suliveres, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Lorenzo Villalba for Marcos Ramirez Lavandero to Withdraw as Attorney (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

5443 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. to Vila del Corral for expenses during the month of October, l994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

5444 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $100. covering custody services for the period of Sept 14, 1993 thru Sept. 13, l994 as per invoice #94−330 from Banco Central Hispano. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

5445 MOTION by Rafael Hernandez−Colon to Extend Time until 1/23/95 to answer fifth amended complaint (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5432: Granting disbursement of expert fees in the amt of $19,870.98 payable to Steve J. Martin by Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

5446 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,193.50 for expenses during the month of November, 1994 payable to Jeffrey M. Williams. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 165 of 513

12/13/1994 12/13/1994 12/13/1994 12/13/1994 12/13/1994 12/14/1994 12/14/1994
12/15/1994 12/15/1994 12/15/1994 12/15/1994 12/16/1994 12/16/1994 12/16/1994 12/16/1994 12/16/1994 12/16/1994 12/19/1994 12/19/1994

5447 ORDER Approving the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $153,116.27 for expenses during the month of November, 1994 by Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)
5448 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,093. payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of November, 1994.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)
5449 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $9,417.30 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of November, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)
5450 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,384. payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of November, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)
5451 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,156.25 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of November, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)
5452 MOTION in compliance w/Court order dtd 11−10−94 by gov't defts. w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)
5453 ORDER Defts shall deposit the sum of $577,883.42 with the Clerk of the Court within 90 days of entry of this order. The Court will then enter an order directing their transmission to the Court Monitor, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/15/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5437: Noted after a careful review of the itemized statement. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/16/1994)
5454 Application for deposit of fine funds in the amt of $500,000. to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1994)
5455 20th REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1994)
5456 MOTION notifying amendment to Interagency Agreement among the Administration of Correction, the Department of Health and the Department of Drug Addiction Services by gov't defts., w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1994)
5457 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $452.50 for fees earned during the month of November, 1994 to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/19/1994)
5458 LETTER MOTION in the Spanish language by Julio Medina−Medina for Appointment of Atty Garcia Gutierrez as Counsel (il) (Entered: 12/19/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 498918 in the amt of $100. payable to Banco Central Hispano for custody services from Sept 1993 thru Sept. 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/19/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 498917 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. for accounting services during the month of Oct. 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/19/1994)
5459 APPLICATION for authorization regarding secretarial salaries for Emily Miranda Padilla in the amt of $25,050. and for Damary Vargas in the amt of $17,000. to be effective Jan. 1st, l995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 12/19/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #498916 in the amt of $2,088.57 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/23/1994)
5460 SIXTY−NINTH Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon Torres, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 12/20/1994)
5461 INFORMATIVE MOT regarding the Expedited Bail Project's November, 1994 invoice, by Ivette Colon Torres, Acting Director, EBP. (il) (Entered: 12/20/1994)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 166 of 513

12/19/1994 12/19/1994 12/20/1994 12/20/1994 12/20/1994 12/20/1994 12/20/1994
12/20/1994 12/20/1994 12/20/1994 12/20/1994 12/21/1994 12/23/1994 12/23/1994 12/27/1994 12/27/1994 12/27/1994 12/27/1994 12/27/1994

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #498945 in the amt of $2,193.50 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/23/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #498946 in the amt of $1,093 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5445: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/20/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5454: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/20/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5456: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/20/1994)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5452: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/20/1994)
5462 ORDER Approving the Use of Fine Funds to Pay Tuition and Materials for Inmates enrolled in the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute's Garment Manufacturing Workshop at the Ponce and Rio Piedras Penitentiary Complexes. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/20/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #498948 in the amt of $7,384.00 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 498947 in the amt of $9,417.30 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/21/1994)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #1,156.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 12/21/1994)
5463 MOTION in compliance with Items No. 24 thru 30 of the Classification Stipulation and Req. for ext of time to comply with Item 5 of the FRP Stipulation, by gov't defts. (il) Modified on 12/21/1994 (Entered: 12/21/1994)
5464 MOTION SUBMITTING compliance with Item 5 of the FRP Stipulation by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 12/23/1994)
5465 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Compel compliance w/orders dtd 10/4/94 and 11/2/94 concerning the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5466 RESPONSE by Carlos Morales−Feliciano in opposition to [5463−1] mot in compliance with item No. 24 thru 30 of the classification stip. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #499131 in the amt of $452.50 payable to Jose E. Fernandez for the month of Nov. 1994. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #499132 in the amt of $22,102.15 payable to Hogar Crea, Inc. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5467 TRANSFER slip from acct #501−00001−7 of Bco Central Hispano to acct #501−00003−3 of Bco. Central Hispano in the amt of $115,502.61 in re: operating expenses for Jan−Feb 1995 (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5468 MOTION SUBMITTING financial stms and supplementary information for the period ending Sep 30, 1994 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5469 ORDER approving the 9th report of the Hogar Crea, Inc. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,102.15 to Hogares Crea, Inc.(signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 167 of 513

12/28/1994 12/29/1994
12/29/1994 12/29/1994 12/29/1994 12/29/1994 12/29/1994 12/30/1994 12/30/1994 12/30/1994 12/30/1994 01/03/1995
01/03/1995 01/03/1995 01/05/1995 01/05/1995 01/05/1995
01/05/1995
01/05/1995 01/05/1995 01/05/1995 01/05/1995

5470 MOTION in compliance with Section II.B.6 of the revised stipulation w/ 1st quarterly report from CCC. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5471 ORDER regarding fine funds transf to the Ponce Pilot Project pursuant to the Dec 1991 stipulation regarding population management and a pilot project at Ponce ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5472 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $27,575.37 to Hogares Crea, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5473 MOTION SUBMITTING correctional health semi−annual reports by CCHC w/attchs (box). (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER [5461−1] remark Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER [5463−1] remark Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [5459−1] remark ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5474 MOTION in compliance with items 53,35,55,41 and 42 of the "staffing stipulation" by govt defts. w/exhs 5. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5475 MOTION SUBMITTING exh A copy of a letter from the Admin. of Corrections Acting Adm. by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5476 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Otto Riefkohl, Administration of Correction by Gloria Rivera−Carrero (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5477 MOTION filing 1st quarterly report by Facilities Rehabilitation Program w/exh I. (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5478 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 1/5/95 to submit revisions to the Custody Manpower management plan to the court monitor (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5479 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time until 1/31/95 to comply with paragraph 13 of the stipulation regarding classification (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5480 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,651.27 for the month of Dec 1994 for counsel H. Anduze (np) (Entered: 01/04/1995)
5481 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez regarding Roster Management System (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
5482 MOTION by Atty Jeffrey Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt off $570.60 for expenses during the month of December, 1994 (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
5483 MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time to comply with Section III E.2 of the Revised Stipulation (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
5484 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: amendments to Custody Manpower Plan to the Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
5485 MOTION by Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $6,624. for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
5486 MOTION by Atty Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $10,320.70 for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
5487 MOTION by Atty Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,925. for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)
5488 MOTION by Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $570. for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/10/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 168 of 513

01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/10/1995 01/11/1995 01/11/1995 01/11/1995 01/11/1995 01/11/1995
01/12/1995 01/12/1995 01/12/1995 01/12/1995

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5478: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5477: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5475: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5474: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5470: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5468: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5473: Noted and Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5479: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
5489 ORDER Approving the Court Monitors Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $371,904.82 covering the period of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
5490 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of Monitors' Time and Expenses in the amt of $371,904.82 covering the period of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
5491 MOTION SUBMITTING final quarterly Accounting Report for the Fiscal Year 1994−1995 for the Ponce Pilot Project by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 01/11/1995)
5492 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,651.27 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
5493 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,925. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
5494 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,624. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
5495 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $10,320.70 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
5496 MOTION SUBMITTING Proposed Plan to transfer the Expedited Bail Project (EBP) functions to a pre−trial service division of the Dept of Corrections and Rehabilitation (DCR) by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5481: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5484: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
5497 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $570.60 to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5483: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 169 of 513

01/12/1995 01/12/1995 01/12/1995 01/13/1995 01/13/1995 01/13/1995 01/13/1995 01/13/1995 01/17/1995 01/17/1995 01/17/1995 01/17/1995 01/17/1995 01/17/1995 01/18/1995 01/19/1995 01/19/1995 01/20/1995 01/23/1995 01/23/1995

5498 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $570. payable to Atty Nora Rodriguez for expenses during the month of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
5499 294th REPORT of the Court Monitor − Second Report purs to Paragraphs III B.1−4 of the Revised Stipulation w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
5500 ORDER Regarding defts' Work Plan and Status Report for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (FRP). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/12/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5491: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5496: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5499: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1995)
5501 ELEVENTH REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1995)
5502 293rd REPORT of the Court Monitor − Report on Compliance with the Sept. 1994 Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #499446 in the amt of $6,624. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #499444 in the amt of $10,320.70 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 499443 in the amt of $27,575.37 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. for expenses during the month of Nov. 94−95. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 499450 in the amt of $570.60 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 499448 in the amt of $570. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #499447 in the amt of $1,651.27 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
5511 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,675. invoice #2495 for the month of November, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1995)
5503 MOTION SUBMITTING payment for the Expedited Bail Project in the amt of $392,365.13 by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
5504 NOTICE of defts Submission of the Facilities Rehabilitation Program Account Balance Reports (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
5505 Letter MOTION by Reinaldo Rivera Torres regarding procedures used at State Penitentiary (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
5506 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano concerning reorganization plan (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
5507 Informative Motion by Rafael Hernandez−Colon re: atty change of address. (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 170 of 513

01/23/1995 01/23/1995 01/24/1995 01/26/1995 01/26/1995 01/26/1995 01/26/1995 01/26/1995
01/26/1995 01/26/1995 01/26/1995 01/26/1995 01/27/1995 01/30/1995
01/31/1995
01/31/1995 01/31/1995 02/02/1995 02/02/1995 02/02/1995

5508 MOTION by Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Isabel Suliveres, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Lorenzo Villalba, Rafael Hernandez−Colon to Extend Time until 1/23/95 to answer pltfs Fifth Amended Complaint (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
5509 MOTION SUBMITTING comments to the Status Report and Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program by Carlos Morales−Feliciano (il) (Entered: 01/24/1995)
5510 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor for the Extension of Funding for the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users Under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 01/25/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5503: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5504: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5506: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5507: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5508: Granted as to the mot to withdraw as counsel for the co−defts mentioned herein, except former Gov. Hernandez Colon. These co−defts have 30 days to announce their new attorneys. Granted as to the req for extension of thirty days to file an answer to the Fifth Amended Complaint. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1995)
5512 ORDER Regarding current Mission Inventory ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1995)
5513 Recommendation of the Special Advisory Committee (SAC) purs to Court Order of Dec. 19, 1994. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1995)
5514 Expedited Bail Project's December, 1994 invoice in the amt of $68,276.14 (il) (Entered: 01/27/1995)
5515 17th Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1995)
5516 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: filing of status report of FRP within the next 30 days. (il) (Entered: 01/30/1995)
5517 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req for ext of time to file English translations by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 01/31/1995)
5518 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req for ext of time to file missing audits and English translation of the same by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1995)
5519 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time until 2/3/95 to file The Classification Manual (il) (Entered: 02/01/1995)
5520 ORDER Regarding Population Capacities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/01/1995)
5521 MOTION SUBMITTING payment for EBP Account by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 02/03/1995)
5522 MOTION by Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for Attorney Fees in the amt of $10,496.60 for expenses during the month of January, 1995 (il) (Entered: 02/03/1995)
5523 MOTION by Atty Rachel Brill for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,125. for expenses during the month of January, 1995 (il) (Entered: 02/03/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 171 of 513

02/02/1995 02/03/1995 02/03/1995 02/03/1995 02/03/1995 02/03/1995 02/06/1995
02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995
02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995
02/07/1995
02/07/1995
02/07/1995
02/07/1995

5524 MOTION by Atty Carlos V. Garcia for Attorney Fees in the amt of $15,312.44 for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/03/1995)
5525 MOTION by Atty Luis M. Villaronga for Attorney Fees in the amt of $781.25 for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/06/1995)
5526 MOTION by Atty Jose E. Fernandez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $880. for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/06/1995)
5527 MOTION by Atty Harry Anduze for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,649.27 for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/06/1995)
5528 MOTION by Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for Attorney Fees in the amt of $2,433.25 for expenses during the month of January, 1994. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1995)
5529 MOTION submitting CLASSIFICATION MANUAL by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1995)
5530 MOTION submitting certified translations of the Corrective Active Plans of Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER [5515−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5514: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER [5510−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5516: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5517: Note. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5521: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER [5518−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting [5519−1] motion to Extend Time until 2/3/95 to file The Classification Manual ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5531 MOTION by Atty Nora Rodriguez for Attorney Fees in the amt of $825. for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5532 MOTION SUBMITTING Summary of the Morales Feliciano Litigation by Vincent M. Nathan w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5533 ORDER granting [5522−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $10,496.60 for expenses during the month of January, 1995 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5534 ORDER granting [5523−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $3,125. for expenses during the month of January, 1995 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5535 ORDER granting [5524−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $15,312.44 for expenses during the month of January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5536 ORDER granting [5527−1] motion for Attorney Fees in the amt of $1,649.27 for expenses during the month of January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5537 ORDER concerning compliance with October 4, 1994 and November 2, 1994 orders regarding FRP. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 172 of 513

02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/07/1995
02/07/1995 02/07/1995 02/08/1995 02/08/1995 02/08/1995 02/08/1995 02/08/1995 02/08/1995 02/09/1995 02/10/1995 02/10/1995 02/10/1995 02/10/1995 02/10/1995 02/10/1995

02/08/1995)
5538 ORDER concerning the Revised Organizational Plan ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5539 ORDER regarding defts' Evaluation of the Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5540 ORDER amending conditions imposed on the use of Fine Funds to establish Garment Manufacturing Workshops at the Ponce and Rio Piedras Penitentiary Complexes. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5541 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $27,771.50 to Hogares Crea Inc. for payment of invoice accompanying the 11th Report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5542 ORDER Approving the extension of funding for the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5543 ORDER Approving the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $174,059. covering the period of Jan. 1 thru Jan. 31, 1995 by Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1995)
5544 ORDER, Consolidating Case Civ 95−1033 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1995)
5545 APPLICATION to substitute Notice of Defendants' Submission filed on 1−19−95 by Deputy Court Monitor w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1995)
5546 ITEMIZED Statement of Monitors' Time and Expenses covering the period of Jan. 1st thru Jan. 31, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1995)
5547 Designation of Alternate Lead Counsel by Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1995)
5548 Informative mot on the Pre−trial Services Program by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1995)
5549 MOTION enclosing missing Quarterly Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/09/1995)
5550 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay Vila de Corral invoice #2583 in the amt of $1,625. for services during the month of January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/09/1995)
5551 AMENDED ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #2495 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral and Co. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/10/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5529: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5530: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1995)
5552 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,433.25 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1995)
5553 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $880. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1995)
5554 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $781.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 173 of 513

02/10/1995 02/10/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/13/1995 02/14/1995 02/14/1995 02/14/1995 02/15/1995
02/15/1995 02/16/1995

5555 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $825.00 payable to atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1995)

5556 Comments on defts Proposed Work Plan and Status Report for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (FRP) by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER [5548−1] remark Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5547: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5545: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

5557 Notice of atty appearance on behalf of Lorenzo Villalba, Mercedes Otero de Ramos, Joes E. Soler Zapata, Isabel Suliveres and Jose A. Nunez Lopez by Gloria Rivera Carrero from US DOJ. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 508274 in the amt of $3,125. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508275 in the amt of $15,312.44 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508276 in the amt of $10,496.60 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508273 in the amt of $1.649.27 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508272 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral & Co for services rendered during the month of November, 1994. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508278 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila del Corral and Co for services rendered during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508277 in the amt of $27,771.35 payable to Hogar Crea Inc. for expenses during the month of December, 1994. (il) (Entered: 02/16/1995)

5558 12th Report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 02/15/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508404 in the amt of $2,433.25 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/16/1995)

5559 ANSWER to FIFTH AMENDED COMPLAINT by Lorenzo Villalba, Mercedes Otero de Ramos, Jose E. Soler Zapata, Isabel Suliveres and Jose A. Nunez. (il) (Entered: 02/16/1995)

5560

MOTION by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez to Extend Time until 3/7/95 to file list of all Administration of Correction facilities reflecting the maximum capacity at 55 square feet of living and sleeping space per prisoner for each such institution and for each housing unit. (il) (Entered: 02/16/1995)

5561 MOTION submitting Supplemental Facility Inventory by gov't defts. w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/16/1995)

5562 MOTION enclosing Certified Translations of the Corrective Action Plans for the Quarterly Food Services Audit by gov't defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/17/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 174 of 513

02/17/1995
02/17/1995
02/21/1995
02/21/1995 02/21/1995 02/22/1995 02/22/1995 02/22/1995 02/22/1995 02/22/1995 02/22/1995 02/23/1995 02/24/1995 02/27/1995 02/27/1995 02/27/1995 02/27/1995
02/27/1995 02/28/1995 02/28/1995 02/28/1995
02/28/1995

5563 ORDER Confirming the 293rd Report of the Court Monitor −− Report on Compliance with the September 1, 1994 Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/17/1995)
5564 MOTION req. ext of time until 3/1/95 to file the name of the Independent Accounting Firm purs to Court order dtd 2−7−95 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/21/1995)
5565 295th REPORT OF THE COURT MONITOR−−THIRD REPORT PURS TO PARAGRAPHS III.B.l−4 of the REVISED STIPULATION w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/21/1995)
5566 MOTION Submitting Classification Work Plan and Req. Modification of Classification Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/22/1995)
5567 SUBMISSION of Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for November, December l994 and January 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 02/22/1995)
5568 COURT MONITOR'S ASSESSMENT OF DEFTS' REVISIONS OF THE CUSTODY MANPOWER MANAGEMENT PLAN. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5564: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5560: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1995)
5569 ORDER concerning Pre−Trial Services Plan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5562: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5561: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5567: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/24/1995)
5570 MOTION in compliance with Facilities Rehabilitation Program (FRP) order of 2−7−95 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5568: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/28/1995)
5571 SEVENTY−FIRST Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon Torres − Acting Director (il) (Entered: 02/28/1995)
5572 INFORMATIVE MOTION Regarding the Expedited Bail Project's January, 1994 Invoice (il) (Entered: 02/28/1995)
5573 MOTION submitting name of the Independent Accounting Firm Arthur Andersen LLP which will conduct audits of all expenditures from FRP construction and management accounts by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/28/1995)
5574 ANSWER by Rafael Hernandez−Colon (Attorney Marcos A. Ramirez ) to fifth amended complaint (il) (Entered: 02/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5570: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5575 MOTION for extension of time until 3/15/95 to file inmate disciplinary regulations by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5576 MOTION regarding Item No. 9 of the Security Stipulation and req ext of time of 90 days to file plan for lock shops and security equipment maintenance in AOC institutions by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5577 MOTION in compliance with Items 37,38 and 40 of the Classification Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 175 of 513

02/28/1995
02/28/1995 02/28/1995
03/01/1995 03/01/1995
03/01/1995 03/02/1995 03/02/1995 03/02/1995 03/02/1995 03/02/1995 03/02/1995 03/03/1995 03/03/1995 03/03/1995
03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995

5578 ORDER directing Defts to reimburse Fine Fund for atty fees and expenses advanced from April 1, 1994 thru September 30, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5579 MOTION in compliance with Item 56 of the Staffing Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5580 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor regarding the Termination of Funding for the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5581 MOTION in compliance with Item 29 of the Staffing Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5582 MOTION req ext of time to comply with Paragraph 20 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and informative mot on alternate Shift Rotation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5583 MOTION in compliance with December 29, regarding Pilot Project at Ponce and req ext of time to file the English version, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/02/1995)
5584 MOTION in regard to the Use of Force Section/Timetable of the Security Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1995)
5585 MOTION regarding Item l6 of the Staffing Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1995)
5586 APPLICATION for attys fees by Bruce J. McGiverin in the amt of $3,618.30 for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1995)
5587 APPLICATION for attys fees for Carlos V. Garcia in the amt of $7,166.67 for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1995)
5588 APPLICATION for atty fees of Rachel Brill in the amount of $1,325.00 for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1995)
5589 DESIGNATION of Atty Jose E. Fernandez as Lead Counsel during 3/2 − 3/8/95, by Atty Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5573: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5572: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1995)
5590 APPLICATION for atty fee in the amt of $1,304.50 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1995)
5591 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,429.04 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5576: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5582: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5580: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5579: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5577: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5584: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 176 of 513

03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/06/1995 03/07/1995
03/07/1995 03/07/1995 03/07/1995 03/08/1995 03/09/1995 03/09/1995 03/09/1995 03/09/1995 03/09/1995 03/10/1995

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5585: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5589: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5583: Noted. The extension of time is granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5575: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5581: Noted. There is no need to file English translations at this time. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
5592 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,325.00 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of February, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
5593 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,618.30 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
5594 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,166.67 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of February, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1995)
5595 MOTION for ext of time to comply with Court order of Jan. 31, 1995 ordering defts to file a list of all Administration of Correction Facilities reflecting the maximum capacity at 55 square feet of living and sleeping space per prisoner for each such institution and for each housing unit therein by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1995)
5596 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,304.50 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of February, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1995)
5597 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,429.04 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1995)
5598 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $24,428.72 to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1995)
5599 MOTION in compliance w/Court order dtd 2−7−95 req the time frame of the Audit to be performed on the FRP Accounts as well as the date of filing the result, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/09/1995)
5600 REPLY to defts' mot submitting classification Work Plan and Req modification of the Classification Stipulation by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 03/10/1995)
5601 MOTION rectifying Title of Defts mot dtd 3/1/95, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/10/1995)
5602 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $487.50 for atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/10/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508884 in the amt of $1,325. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 508883 in the amt of $3,618.30 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508921 in the amt of $1,304.50 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 177 of 513

03/10/1995 03/10/1995
03/10/1995 03/13/1995 03/13/1995 03/13/1995 03/13/1995 03/13/1995 03/14/1995 03/14/1995 03/14/1995 03/15/1995 03/15/1995 03/15/1995 03/15/1995 03/15/1995 03/16/1995 03/16/1995 03/17/1995 03/17/1995

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508922 in the amt of $2,429.04 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1995)

5603

AMENDED ORDER The Court vacates order dtd 3−6−95 which mistakenly stated that the fees and expenses were awarded for the month of January, 1995. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,166.67 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for fees and expenses during the month of February, 1995 to be drawn from the interest earned on the fines paid by the defts. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/13/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 24,428.72 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5600: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5601: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)

5604 MOTION for an Order that defts deliver to pltfs attys a copy of the Arthur Andersen LLP Scope of Audit Proposal and for ext of time to respond. (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)

5605 MOTION submitting Payment for EBP Account in the amt of $61,757.89 ck#01305028 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)

5606 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $487.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of February, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/14/1995)

5607 AMENDMENT to 294th Report of the Court Monitor − Second Report purs to Paragraphs III.B.1−4 of the Revised Stipulation, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1995)

5608 MOTION for ext of time to comply with Court order concerning Monitor's payments to I.I.T.E.M., by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #508967 in the amt of $7,166.67 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/16/1995)

5609 APPLICATION for Deposit of Funds in the amt of $1,000,000. to replenish the fund established, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/16/1995)

5610 FIRST REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 03/16/1995)

5611 MOTION for ext of time until 3/28/95 to file the inmate disciplinary regulations by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/16/1995)

5612 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/16/1995)

5613 SIXTH QUARTERLY REPORT of the Health Care Executive Committee by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/16/1995)

5614 MOTION to withdraw request for defts to deliver a copy of proposed scope of work prepared by Arthur Andersen LLP, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 03/17/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509021 in the amt of $ 487.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/21/1995)

5615 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee Regarding Hogar Crea's Expenditures between 2/94 and 1/95 in the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1995)

5616 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 178 of 513

03/20/1995 03/20/1995 03/20/1995 03/20/1995 03/20/1995 03/20/1995 03/21/1995 03/21/1995 03/21/1995 03/21/1995
03/21/1995 03/22/1995 03/23/1995
03/23/1995 03/23/1995 03/24/1995

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5614: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/21/1995)

5617 MOTION amending the Timetable for Training and Implementation of the Selected Roster Management System as submitted by defts in their mot of March 1, 1995 in compliance w/paragraph 20 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/21/1995)

5618 MOTION in response to pltfs reply to defts mot submitting Classification Work Plan and req. modification of Classification Stipulation and req. ext of time to reply by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/21/1995)

5619 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses covering the period of February 1 through March 3, 1995 by Court Monitor Vincent M. Nathan w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/21/1995)

5620 ORDER Contingent to no objection being filed within ten days of this order, the Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses in the amt of $191,336.36 covering the period from 2/1 − 3/3/95 submitted by the Court Monitor is approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/21/1995)

5621 ORDER Granting defts mot dtd 3/7/95 req ext of time until 3/31/95 to comply with court order dtd 1/31/95 regarding Population Capacities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/21/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5605: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1995)

5622 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #2683 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila de Corral & Company for services provided during the month of December, 1994. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1995)

5623 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay Banco Santander the amt of $25.00 covering custody services for the period of August 1, 1994 to January 31, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1995)

5624

ORDER Defts are ordered to deposit the sum of $1,000,000. with the clerk of the Court within 10 days. Upon receipt of this deposit, the clerk shall issue a check in the same amt payable to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation and notify the Office of the Court Monitor that the check is available. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1995)

5625 ORDER Confirming the 294th Report of the Court Monitor − Second Report purs to paragraphs III.B.1−4 of the Revised Stipulation, and Directing payment of fine in the amt of $2,327,600. by defts no later than 4/10/95, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/22/1995)

5626 Copy of Receipt # 75920 in the amount of $ 577,883.42 re: payments to I.I.T.E.M. by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/23/1995)

5627

ORDER Confirming 295th Report of the Court Monitor. Defts shall pay to the Clerk of this Court the sum of $3,415,900. as a sanction for continuing contempt of this court's orders. The payment shall be deposited within 30 days of the entry of this order, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/24/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509143 in the amt of $1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. for services rendered during the month of January, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/27/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509142 in the amt of $25.00 payable to Banco Santander for custody services for the period of Aug. lst, 1994 thru Jan. 31, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/30/1995)

5628 MOTION for disbursement of Expert Fees in the amt of $16,993.26 payable to Steve Martin covering the period from November, 1994 to February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/27/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 179 of 513

03/24/1995 03/24/1995
03/28/1995 03/28/1995 03/28/1995 03/28/1995
03/28/1995 03/30/1995 03/30/1995 03/30/1995 03/30/1995 03/31/1995
04/03/1995 04/03/1995 04/03/1995 04/04/1995
04/04/1995 04/04/1995
04/04/1995 04/05/1995 04/05/1995

5629 MOTION submitting payment for atty fees and expenses in the amt of $356,632.82 ck#01227305 to reimburse fine funds by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/27/1995)

5630

ORDER concerning defts' mot for ext of time to complete tasks in the classification stipulation. Defts mot (dkt#5566) to enlarge time for compliance with the tasks outlined in paragraphs l6 and 17 of the Classification Stipulation is granted until 12/31/95. Defts mot (dkt#5566) to enlarge time for compliance with the tasks outlined in paragraphs 18,37,38,40 and 41 is DENIED, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/27/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5629: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/29/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5628: Granted and so ordered. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/29/1995)

5631 MOTION regarding Inmate Discipline Plan Negotiation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1995)

5632 SUR−REPLY to pltfs Reply to defts mot submitting Classification Work Plan and req Modification of Classification Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1995)

5633 MOTION regarding Item 16 of the Staffing Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1995)

5634 SUBMISSION of Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for February, 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1995)

5635 SEVENTY−SECOND Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1995)

5636 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's February, 1995 invoice in the amt of $49,164.95 by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1995)

5637 PLTFS opposition to defts Roster Management Designation and Request for Remedial Measures, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1995)

5638 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to issue a check in the amt of $577,883.42 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1995)

5646 MOTION reference List of AOC Correction Facilities reflecting maximum capacity by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

5647 MOTION in compliance with Court Order referring to AOC Facilities reflecting maximum capacities by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

5648 MOTION submitting Deposit of Funds in the amt of $1,000,000. by gov't defts. Receipt #76051 Ck#01227323. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509455 in the amt of $577,883.42 payable to Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 04/06/1995)

5649 2ND Quarterly Report of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator − Report on Activities between Dec. 31st, 1994 and March 31, 1995. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509456 in the amt of $1,000,000. payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

5650 Submission of Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for Morales Feliciano Account by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)

5639 MOTION for attys fees in the amt of $2,493.65 for expenses during the month of March, 1995 by Atty Harry Anduze. (il) (Entered: 04/06/1995)

5640 MOTION for attys fees in the amt of $496.00 for expenses during the month of March, 1995 by Atty Jeffrey Williams. (il) (Entered: 04/06/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 180 of 513

04/05/1995 04/05/1995 04/05/1995 04/05/1995
04/06/1995 04/06/1995 04/06/1995 04/06/1995 04/10/1995 04/10/1995
04/10/1995
04/10/1995 04/10/1995
04/11/1995 04/11/1995
04/11/1995
04/12/1995 04/12/1995 04/12/1995 04/12/1995 04/12/1995 04/12/1995

5641 MOTION for attys fees in the amt of $2,593.75 for expenses during the month of March, 1995 by atty Rachel Brill. (il) (Entered: 04/06/1995)
5642 MOTION for attys fees in the amt of $8,661.95 for expenses during the month of March, 1995 by atty Bruce J. McGiverin. (il) (Entered: 04/06/1995)
5643 MOTION for attys fees in the amt of $16,703.17 for expenses during the month of March, 1995 by atty Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 04/06/1995)
5644 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $23,861.25 to Hogares Crea Inc., for the four−month period starting February, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #5612: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5611: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)
5645 MOTION for attys fees in the amt of $810.00 for expenses during the month of March, 1995 by atty Nora L. Rodriguez. (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)
5651 ORDER, Consolidating Case Civ. 95−1395 with Civ. 79−4 ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte ) (il) (Entered: 04/07/1995)
5652 LETTER mot req. that copies of orders and notifications be discontinued by Thomas B. Heffelfinger. (il) (Entered: 04/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5652: This mot is hereby granted. The Clerk shall forthwith stop notifying any court paper or document to the Appleton Prison Corp. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/11/1995)
5653 MOTION to ext time until 4/18/95 to file response to pltfs oppos to Roster Management Designation and Req for Remedial Measures by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/11/1995)
5654 ITEMIZED statement of Monitors' Time and Expenses covering the period of March 1 through March 31, 1995. (il) (Entered: 04/11/1995)
5655 MOTION in compliance w/Orders dtd 3/20 and 3/23/95, submitting the amts of $2,327,600. and $3,415,900. receipt #76143 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5613: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/12/1995)
5656 AMENDMENT TO 295TH REPORT OF THE COURT MONITOR− THIRD REPORT PURS TO PARAGRAPHS III.B.1−4 OF THE REVISED STIPULATION. (il) (Entered: 04/12/1995)
5657 296TH REPORT OF THE COURT MONITOR − FOURTH REPORT PURS TO PARAGRAPHS III.B.1−4 OF THE REVISED STIPULATION (VOLS l and 2 plus to boxes of exhbs. attached). (il) (Entered: 04/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509673 in the amt of $23,861.25 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5658 MOTION regarding Items 13 thru 16 of the Staffing Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5659 SECOND Report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5655: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5654: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5660 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral & Company for invoice #2805 for services rendered during the month of

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 181 of 513

04/12/1995
04/12/1995
04/12/1995
04/12/1995
04/12/1995
04/12/1995
04/12/1995 04/12/1995 04/12/1995
04/12/1995 04/17/1995 04/17/1995 04/17/1995 04/17/1995 04/17/1995 04/17/1995 04/18/1995 04/18/1995 04/18/1995
04/18/1995

January, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5661 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $16,703.17 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of March, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5662 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $8,661.95 payable to Atty Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, l995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5663 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,593.75 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of March, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5664 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $496.00 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of March, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5665 ORDER Regarding the termination of Funding for the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5666 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $19,250. payable to Metropolitan University. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5667 ORDER Regarding defts mot listing housing unit capacities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5668 ORDER Approving itemized statement submitted by Court Monitor in the amt of $103,641.76. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
5669 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,493.65 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5653: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/13/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5658: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/18/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5659: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/18/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5650: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/18/1995)
5670 AMENDED Submission of Financial Statements and Supporting Scheduled for Morales Feliciano Account, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/18/1995)
5671 APPLICATION for Employment of Secretary Socorro Quinones Claudio to replace Emily Miranda Padilla, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/18/1995)
5672 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/18/1995)
5673 MOTION in response to pltfs mot of 3/31/95 and in oppos to pltfs req fo remedial measures by gov't defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/19/1995)
5674 MOTION to amend order dtd 2/21/91 re atty fees of Jeffrey Williams, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 04/19/1995)
5675 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #2869 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral for services provided during the month of March, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509764 in the amt of $2,593.75 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for fees during the month of March, 1995. (il)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 182 of 513

04/18/1995
04/18/1995
04/18/1995 04/18/1995
04/18/1995
04/19/1995 04/20/1995
04/21/1995 04/21/1995 04/24/1995 04/24/1995 04/24/1995 04/24/1995 04/24/1995 04/24/1995
04/25/1995 04/25/1995 04/25/1995 04/25/1995 04/25/1995

(Entered: 04/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509766 in the amt of $16,703.17 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of March, 1995. (il) (Entered: 04/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509765 in the amt of $8,661.95 payable to atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, 1995. (il) (Entered: 04/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509763 in the amt of $19,250. payable to Metropolitan University. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509768 in the amt of $2,493.65 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1995. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509762 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. for services rendered during the month of February, 1995. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5676 MOTION introducing the FRP Quarterly Report by FRP Director. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #509829 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. for services rendered during the month of March, 1995. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5677 MOTION submitting Staffing Pattern purs to Item 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5678 MOTION submitting page missing on exhb. filed by gov't defts on March 1, 1995 mot regarding items 8 and 12 of the Security Stipulation. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5679 APPLICATION for reimbursement of Barrell and Associates Inc. by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5680 APPLICATION for employment of experts by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5681 MOTION for ext of time until 5/8/95 to review and submit response to 296th Report of the Court Monitor, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5649: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5647: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5682 ORDER The Clerk shall advance the amt of $496. payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of March, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5634: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5616: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5635: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5636: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5684 INFORMATIVE mot submitting exhb. 1 to be attached to the 2nd Quartertly Report of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator−Report by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 183 of 513

04/25/1995
04/25/1995 04/25/1995
04/25/1995 04/26/1995 04/26/1995 04/26/1995
04/26/1995 04/26/1995 04/26/1995 04/26/1995
04/27/1995
04/27/1995 04/27/1995 04/27/1995 04/28/1995 05/01/1995 05/01/1995 05/01/1995 05/01/1995 05/01/1995
05/01/1995

5685 NOMINATION of Deputy Monitors and Applications for Permission to increase the salary of the Project Coordinator and a Monitor by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5619: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5686 ORDER Regarding defts mot in compliance w/Dec. 29, 1194 order regarding fine funds transferred to the Ponce Pilot Project. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5687 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,900. payable to Hogar Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5683 MOTION to Report on Progress of the pts negotiations on Inmate Discipline Regulations by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5631: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5688 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $810. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of March, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5648: NOTED. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5633: Moot as the fifteen day ext has already elapsed. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5646: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #520524 in the amt of $496. payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of March, 1995. (il) (Entered: 05/01/1995)
5689 LETTER mot req. transfer of EBP bimonthly payment in the amt of $115,502.61 for the months of May and June 1995 by Ivette Colon Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 04/27/1995)
5690 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's March 1995 Invoice by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 04/28/1995)
5691 SEVENTY−THIRD FINANCIAL Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 04/28/1995)
5692 SUBMISSION of Interim Report of Health Care Executive Committee by Court Monitor (il) (Entered: 04/28/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #520723 in the amt of $810. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez. (il) (Entered: 05/01/1995)
5693 APPLICATION to continue reimbursement of Barrell and Associates by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5692: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5690: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5691: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
5694 ORDER directing defts to reimburse fine fund for atty fees and expenses advanced from 10/1/94 thru 3/31/95. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
5695 ORDER regarding the amendments to 295th Report. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 184 of 513

05/01/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/1995 05/02/1995 05/03/1995 05/03/1995 05/03/1995 05/03/1995 05/04/1995 05/05/1995 05/05/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #520767 in the amt of $2,900. payable to Hogares Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
5696 ORDER ruling on mots concerning the Classification Stipulation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5684: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5683: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5681: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5678: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5677: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5676: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/03/1995)
5697 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $240. for expenses during the month of April, 1995 by Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein. (il) (Entered: 05/04/1995)
5698 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $968.75 for expenses during the month of April, 1995 by Atty Rachel Brill. (il) (Entered: 05/04/1995)
5699 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $5,927.80 for expenses during the month of April, 1995 for atty Bruce J. McGiverin. (il) (Entered: 05/04/1995)
5700 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $8,354.71 for expenses during the month of April, 1995 for atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (il) (Entered: 05/04/1995)
5701 FIRST REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1995)
5702 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $2,430.65 for atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of April, 1995. (il) (Entered: 05/08/1995)
5703 MOTION req. ext of time until 5/29/95 to respond to the 296th Report of the Court Monitor by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5617: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5618: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5637: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5701: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5670: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5671: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5672: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5693: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5704 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $23,507.44 payable to Hogares Crea. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 185 of 513

05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/08/1995 05/09/1995
05/09/1995 05/12/1995 05/12/1995 05/12/1995 05/12/1995 05/15/1995 05/15/1995 05/15/1995 05/15/1995 05/15/1995

5705 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $5,927.80 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of April, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5706 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $968.75 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of April, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5707 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $8,354.71 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of April, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5708 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $240. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of April, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5709 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,430.65 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of April, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5710 ITEMIZED Statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses for the period of April l thru 30, l995, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5711 ITEMIZED Statement of Court Monitor's Expenses during the month of April, 1995 for payment of Expert Consultants employed by the Administration of Correction, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5712 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,044.99 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of April, 1995. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5713 MOTION in reference to Court order dtd 2/7/95 req that the Court waive their order for the filing of Addendum to the FRP Stipulation requirements, until the project is further developed, and the plans are finalized, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5714 COPY of ORDER filed in Civ. 94−2044 consolidating it with this case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1995)
5715 MOTION by Atty John F. Conrad to withdraw as atty of record for gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/15/1995)
5716 ORDER Approving the Nominations of Deputy Monitors and Application for Permission to Increase Salaries of Project Coordinator and Deputy Monitor Michael Thompson. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/15/1995)
5717 ORDER Approving employment of experts (dkt#5680). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/15/1995)
5718 ORDER Approving Reimbursement of Barrell and Associates Inc. for Phases I and Phases II of the RFP work plan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/15/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521291 in the amt of $968.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of April, l995. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521288 in the amt of $8,354.71 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of April, 1995. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521292 in the amt of $5,927.80 payable to Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of April, l995. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1995)
5719 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521287 in the amt of $23,507.44 payable to Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 186 of 513

05/15/1995
05/16/1995 05/16/1995 05/16/1995 05/16/1995 05/16/1995 05/16/1995 05/16/1995 05/16/1995 05/16/1995
05/17/1995 05/17/1995
05/19/1995 05/19/1995
05/22/1995 05/22/1995
05/22/1995 05/23/1995
05/23/1995
05/23/1995
05/23/1995

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521289 in the amt of $2,430.65 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of April, 1995. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5720 MOTION req. an increase in expert fees to $125. for Steve J Martin by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5721 MOTION req. hrg regarding Roster Management by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5722 RESPONSE to defts motion req additional time to respond to the 296th Report of the Court Monitor by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5723 MOTION to hold defts in contempt for failure to comply with FRP Stipulation and other orders, and for supplemental relief by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5724 COMMENTS of the Court Monitor regarding defts Housing Unit Capacities. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5725 THIRD REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5726 SEVENTH Quarterly Report of the Health Care Executive Committee by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5715: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5727 ORDER Approving Court Monitor's Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $104,211.80 covering the month of April, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/17/1995)
5728 INFORMATIVE mot re Quarterly Report of the Facilities Rehabilitation Program Director for the period ending 3/95 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/18/1995)
5729 SECOND REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute by Rita Colon − President Fashion Merchandising Institute. (il) (Entered: 05/18/1995)
5730 Minute Entry: S/C set for May 23, 1995 at 5:30PM. (il) (Entered: 05/22/1995)
5731 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625. for services provided during the month of April, 1995 invoice #3022. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/22/1995)
5732 SUBMISSION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for March and April 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/23/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521399 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral for services rendered during the month of April, 1995. (il) (Entered: 05/23/1995)
5733 APPLICATION for Enforcement of the Order of Reference w/memo in support thereof by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/23/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521290 in the amt of $240. payable to Jose E. Fernandez for fees during the month of April, l995. (il) (Entered: 05/24/1995)
5734 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee to Authorize the Use of Fine Funds by Correctional Health Officials to provide Drug Addiction Counseling at Administration of Correction Penal Institutions by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/24/1995)
5735 ORDER Approving the Court Monitor's payment of fees and expenses to expert consultants employed by the Administration of Correction. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/24/1995)
5736 ORDER Directing Administrator of Correction to provide Court Monitor with information regarding Population Levels in Housing Units and Dormitories. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/24/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 187 of 513

05/24/1995
05/24/1995 05/24/1995 05/24/1995 05/24/1995 05/24/1995 05/24/1995
05/25/1995 05/25/1995 05/26/1995 05/26/1995
05/26/1995
05/26/1995 05/30/1995 05/30/1995 05/30/1995 06/01/1995 06/01/1995
06/01/1995

5737 ORDER Amending Court order dtd 5−23−95 directing Administrator of Correction to provide Court Monitor with information regarding Population Levels in Housing Units and Dormitories. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/24/1995)
5738 MOTION for ext of time until 6/15/95 to respond to pending mots., by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/25/1995)
5739 MOTION for ext of time until 6/23/95 to comply with Court order dtd 2/7/95 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/25/1995)
5740 SEVENTY−FOURTH Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 05/25/1995)
5741 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's April, 1995 invoice. (il) (Entered: 05/25/1995)
5742 Minute entry: Hrg on mot regarding Roster Management (dkt#5721) is set. set Status Conference for 9:00 6/9/95 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (il) (Entered: 05/25/1995)
5743 Minute entry: S/C held on 5/23/95 in chambers. Court has ordered the Court Monitor to file and serve his report on the Revised Stipulation as quickly as possible. A hrg will be set regarding the Roster Management and Facilities Rehabilitation Program, etc., as stated herein. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/25/1995)
5744 MOTION enclosing Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req. for ext of time to file English translations w/attachs. by gov't defts. (il) Modified on 05/26/1995 (Entered: 05/26/1995)
5745 MOTION enclosing Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req. for ext of time to file English translations by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/26/1995)
5746 MOTION enclosing Quarterly Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/30/1995)
5747 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,871.20 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute regarding the First Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1995)
5748 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,484. payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute regarding the Second Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5734: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1995)
5749 299th REPORT of the Court Monitor−Report on Defts' Compliance with the Revised Stipulation Vols. I and II. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1995)
5750 Defts Mot to Modify previous Court Orders; Modify the Revised Stipulation to delete paragraph III.B.4 and Revised paragraph III.B.I. and to Object findings of the 296th Report of the Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1995)
5751 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph Nine of the Security Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1995)
5752 ORDER Directing the Court Monitor to make interim payments of fees and expenses to Deputy Compliance Coordinator. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1995)
5753 ORDER Approving the Third Report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users for the Four−Month Period starting Feb. 1995. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $23,599. to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1995)
5754 ORDER Authorizing the Use of Find Funds by Correctional Health Officials to provide Drug Addiction Counseling at Administration of Correction Penal

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 188 of 513

06/01/1995
06/01/1995 06/02/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995 06/05/1995
06/05/1995
06/05/1995
06/06/1995 06/06/1995

Institutions. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1995)
5755 ORDER denying in part/granting in part defts mot req ext of time to respond and setting hrg on pltfs mot regarding Roster Management, etc., as stated herein. set Some Disposition Hearing for 9:00 6/20/95 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/02/1995)
5757 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus by co−deft Tomas Melendez Sanchez petitioner in Civ. 95−1395(PG). (il) (Entered: 06/05/1995)
5756 MOTION for attys fees in the amt of $712.50 by Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5741: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5740: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5724: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5725: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5726: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5744: Noted. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5745: Granted and noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5729: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5746: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
5758 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $1,837.24 payable to atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
5759 MOTION for ext of time to file time sheets for the month of May, 1995 by Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
5760 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $3,312.50 payble to atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
5761 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $4,420.05 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 521683 in the amt of $6,871.20 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute for the first report. (il) (Entered: 06/07/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521684 in the amt of $7,484.40 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute for the second report. (il) (Entered: 06/07/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 521685 in the amt of $23,599. payable to Hogares Crea Inc. for expenses as per third report of rehabilitation program for the month of April, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
5762 MOTION for preliminary injunction to compel defts to adequately fund the Correctional Health Care Program, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1995)
5763 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $2,002.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/07/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 189 of 513

06/06/1995 06/06/1995
06/06/1995
06/07/1995 06/07/1995
06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/08/1995
06/08/1995
06/08/1995
06/08/1995
06/08/1995 06/08/1995 06/09/1995 06/12/1995

5764 PLAINTIFFS preliminary response to DEFTS mot to modify previous court orders, etc. (il) (Entered: 06/07/1995)
5765 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $712.50 payable to atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for atty fees earned during the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/07/1995)
5766 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,837.24 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/07/1995)
5767 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $11,685.88 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
5768 COPY of order in Civ. 95−1412: By order of Judge Casellas Civ. 95−1412 is being reassigned to Judge Perez Gimenez and consolidated with Civ. 79−4, nunc pro tunc as of 5/24/95. (Clerk) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5739: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5751: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5703: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5719: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5722: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5711: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5710: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5764: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/08/1995)
5769 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,002.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/09/1995)
5770 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,044.99 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of April, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5757: AA copy of this pleading shall be sent to pltfs class lead counsel Mr. Carlos Garcia−Gutierrez. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/09/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5720: Granted. Commencing July 1, 1995 Mr. Steve Martin's hourly fees will be $125. per hour. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/09/1995)
5771 ITEMIZED statement of Monitors time and expenses covering the period of May 1 through May 31, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/09/1995)
5772 297th REPORT of the Court Monitor − Report on compliance with the Stipulation Regarding Security (Vols I and II). (il) (Entered: 06/09/1995)
5773 CORRECTION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Funds for March, 1995, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 06/12/1995)
5774 FOURTH REPORT of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users under the Auspicies of Hogar Crea Inc. (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 190 of 513

06/12/1995 06/12/1995 06/12/1995 06/12/1995 06/12/1995 06/12/1995 06/12/1995 06/12/1995 06/13/1995 06/14/1995 06/14/1995 06/14/1995 06/14/1995 06/14/1995 06/14/1995 06/14/1995 06/14/1995 06/15/1995 06/15/1995 06/15/1995

5775 Notice of Resignation of Deputy Monitor Gerardo Rivera Fourquet, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521846 in the amt of $3,047.49 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of April, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5759: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)
5776 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check from the fine fund in the amt of $4,420.05 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)
5777 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,312.50 payable to atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)
5778 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $11,685.88 payable to atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)
5779 ORDER Approving the Court Monitors Itemized Statement in the amt of $99,301.48 for the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK in the amt of $712.50 payable to Jose E. Fernandez Sein, Esq. (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5771: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5773: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5775: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521916 in the amt of $4,420.05 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 521915 in the amt of $11,685.88 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 521914 in the amt of $3,312.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5774: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
5780 MOTION for ext of time to file objections and comments to the 299th Report of the Court Monitor − Report on defts compliance with the Revised Stipulation by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
5781 AMENDED ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,837.24 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1995)
5782 ORDER Concerning defts mot to modify previous Court orders, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/19/1995)
5783 MOTION to file the Report on Roster Management Pilot Project by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1995)
5784 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 191 of 513

06/15/1995 06/15/1995 06/16/1995 06/16/1995 06/19/1995
06/20/1995 06/20/1995
06/22/1995 06/22/1995 06/22/1995 06/22/1995 06/22/1995 06/23/1995 06/23/1995 06/23/1995 06/23/1995 06/23/1995 06/23/1995
06/26/1995 06/27/1995

5785 MOTION req. additional time to respond to pltfs mot regarding FRP dtd 5/18/95 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1995)

5786 COMMENTS of the Court Monitor regarding Defts Housing Unit Capacities. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1995)

5787 MOTION for ext of time to submit defts comments to the 299th Report of the Court Monitor by defts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #521999 in the amt of $1,837.24 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 06/20/1995)

5788 THIRD REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute purs to the Court's Orders of Dec. 19, 1994 and Feb. 6, 1995 covering the period of May 15 − June 15, 1995 in the amt of $16,900.80. (il) (Entered: 06/20/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5780: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/22/1995)

5789

Minute entry: HEARING in re: Roster Management, called. The pts inf that they have reached an agreement. The hrg is continued for 6/26/95 and the pts have until Friday at 4:30pm to file the agreement papers. If the papers are not filed, the Monday's hrg will proceed. If the papers are filed then the hrg will be cancelled. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #5787: Granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5790 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Defendant−All by Luis F. Del Valle−Emmanuelli (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5791 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 6/29/95 to file their opp to plffs' mot concerning FRP (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5792 Informative Motion by EBP regarding the Expedited Bail Project's May 1995 Invoice by Ivette Colon, Acting Director (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5793 SEVENTH FINANCIAL Report by EBP pursuant to the Court's order of 4/28/88. (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5794 MOTION SUBMITTING agreement on Roster Management by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5795 STIPULATION concerning a Roster Management System by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Defendant−All, Joe Colon. (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5796 SUBMISSION of financial statements and supporting schedules by Vincent M. Nathan for the six months period ended 3/31/95. (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5797 298TH REPORT OF THE COURT MONITOR: report on defts' state of compliance w/the open−celling provisions of the 9/8/86 stipulation regarding crowding by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5798 SECOND APPLICATION for enforcement of order of reference, as well as the Court's orders of May 23 and May 24, 1995 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5799

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Show Cause Hearing set for 9:00 6/28/95 the Administrator of Correction, Joe Colon, to appear and to show cause why he should not be held in civil contempt of this Court's order of 3/31/86 (Order fo reference). 5/23/ and 5/24/95.(signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez) (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5800 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: compliance with paragraph 24 of the stipulation of 6/3/95. (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5801 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Defendant−All by Etienne Totti−del−Valle (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 192 of 513

06/28/1995 06/28/1995 06/28/1995 06/28/1995 06/28/1995 06/28/1995
06/29/1995 06/29/1995
06/29/1995 06/30/1995 06/30/1995 07/05/1995 07/05/1995 07/05/1995 07/05/1995 07/05/1995 07/06/1995

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #5801: Granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5802 MOTION by Vincent M. Nathan for John P. Gustafson to Appear Pro Hac Vice (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5803 FIFTH REPORT of the External Education University System (SEDUE) pursuant to Court's order of 1/18/94 (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

5804 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time of 30 days to submit comments to the FRP report submitted by the Court Monitor (np) (Entered: 06/29/1995)

Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5808

Minute entry: OSC HEARING called for the Administrator of Corrections, Joe Colon, why he should not be held in contempt of Court. Counsel Fuentes presented an initial proffer as to the evidence that will be presented. All the evid was gathered and turned over to the Court Monitor. Defts acknowledge one problem: the Ponce Institution. Testimony for the Monitor heard. The parties presented their arguments. Matter stands submitted ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5805 OSC ret'd exec upon Joe Colon, Administrator of Corrections, personally on 6/27/95, by USM. (np) (Entered: 06/30/1995)

5806

OPINION AND ORDER that Joe Colon, Administrator of Correction, is in contempt of this Court's order of Reference and May 24, 1995 order; shall deposit with the Clerk of the Court on Friday, 6/30/95, and every Friday thereafter until contempt is purged, the sum of $100 for each day, including weekends and holidays; the Court Monitor is to provide assistance tot he contemnor in purging contempt; the Court Monitor shall file a report reflecting the Court Monitor's assessment of the contemnor's then−current state of compliance w/the order of Reference and 5/24/95 order; the Court Monitor's report shall be filed upon satisfaction of the Court Monitor that deft has rectified the deficits described in Sec IV of this O&O, but the Court Monitor shall file a report not later than 7/7/95; the Court Monitor is directed to bring to the Court's attention future occurrences of conduct; the USM is to provide personal service of this O&O to Joe Colon. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (np) (Entered: 06/30/1995)

5807 RESPONSE by Defendant−All in opposition to plffs' req for contempt for failure to comply w/the FRP stipulation and other orders (np) (Entered: 06/30/1995)

5809 MOTION SUBMITTING deposit of $100 as required by the June 29, 1995 order by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5810 ORDER confirming the 297th report of the Court Monitor−−report on compliance w/the stipulation regarding security ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5811 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Disbursement of Funds of expert fees to Steve J. Martin, Esq. in the amt of $16,568.13 from Mar 1 thru May 31, 1995 (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5812 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of June 1995 by Bruce J. McGiverin in the amt of $4,208 (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5813 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of June 1995 for Rachel Brill, Esq. in the amt of $6,281.25 (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5814 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of June 1995 of Harry Anduze, Esq. in the amt of $2,555.45 (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #5804: Denied. In view of the change of personnel at the Court Monitor's office, these comments shall be filed not later than 7/10/95 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/06/1995)

5815 ORDER that the Clerk shall issue forthwith a check in the amt of $2,555.45 payable to Harry Anduze, Esq. for atty's fees ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez )

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 193 of 513

07/06/1995 07/06/1995
07/06/1995 07/06/1995 07/06/1995 07/06/1995 07/10/1995 07/10/1995 07/10/1995 07/10/1995 07/10/1995 07/10/1995 07/10/1995

(np) (Entered: 07/07/1995)

5816 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $2,625 for the period of May 1995 in relation to the accounting month of April 1995 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/07/1995)

5817

ORDER that deft Jose Colon shall be deemed to have purged himself of civil contempt as of 10:30pm on 6/30/95. That the Clerk of the Court shall issue a check payable to the Treasury of the Commonwealth of P.R. in the amt of $100 and shall forward it to Jose A. Fuentes Agostini, Esq. Within 5 days of the entry of this order, the govt defts shall file a mot explaining the reason for their deposit of a check drawn on the Treasury of P.R., in contravention of the court's order of 6/29/95. The the Administrator Colon shall refrain from directing, or indirectly suggesting, to any agent or employee of the Administration of Correction that fabricated or improperly altered documentation regarding defts' compliance w/the Court's orders. Within 5 days following the entry of this order, Adm. Colon shall file a copy of a proposed notice, in English and in Spanish, to all agents and employees of the Adm. of Corrections, setting forth in unequivocal terms of duty of those persons to supply the court and the court monitor w/complete, accurate, and honest information in response to any request the court or the court monitor may make. Any failure to serve any agent or employee with the required notice shall result in a personal sanction against Adm. Colon in the amt of $100 per violation, not to exceed $10,000 per month. That Adm. Colon shall file, on the fifth day of each month during the next twelve months, a stmt under penalty of perjury setting forth the precise extent to which and the means by which he was served on all agents and employees of the Adm. of Corrections. Any failure to file the required monthly stmt shall result in a personal sanction against the Adm. in the amt of $10,000 for each such failure to file. The USM shall provide personal service of this order to Joe Colon, Adm of Correction ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/07/1995)

5818 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees of counsel Nora L. Rodriguez, Esq in the amt of $772.50 for the month of June 1995 (np) (Entered: 07/07/1995)

5819 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees of counsel Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez in the amt of $19,132.71 for the month of June 1995 (np) (Entered: 07/07/1995)

5820 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano to Extend Time until 7/28/95 to file quarterly report of Chief Health Care Coordinator (np) (Entered: 07/07/1995)

5821 Report by Vincent M. Nathan pursuant to 6/29/95 O&O holding Administrator Joe Colon in contempt (np) Modified on 07/13/1995 (Entered: 07/07/1995)

5822 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $19,132.71 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/11/1995)

5823 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,281.25 payable to Rachel Brill, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/11/1995)

5824 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,208 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin, Esq. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/11/1995)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #5820: Granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/11/1995)

5825 STATEMENT of time and expenses of period 6/1/95 thru 6/30/95 by Vincent M. Nathan (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503136 in the amt of $2,625 payable to Vila del Corral and Co. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503135 in the amt of $2,555.45 payable to Harry Anduze, Esq. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 194 of 513

07/10/1995
07/11/1995 07/11/1995 07/11/1995 07/12/1995
07/12/1995 07/12/1995 07/12/1995 07/12/1995
07/12/1995
07/13/1995 07/13/1995 07/13/1995
07/13/1995
07/14/1995 07/14/1995 07/14/1995 07/14/1995 07/17/1995 07/17/1995
07/17/1995

5826 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of draft of 392nd rpt of the Court Monitor−rpt in compliance w/the stip regarding the facilities rehabilitation program to the Court Monitor by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
5827 ORDER of contempt of Joe Colon returned exec by USM on 7/6/95. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
5828 OPINION AND ORDER dated 6/29/95 returned exec upon Joe Colon on 6/29/95 by USM. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
VOUCHER no.: 6951016724, amt: $100, check no.: 00107328, payable to: Treasury of the Commonwealth. (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
5829 RESPONSE by Defendant−All to the 298th report of the Court Monitor: report on defts' state of compliance w/the open−celling provisions of the 9/8/86 stip regarding crowding. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503171 in the amt of $19,132.71 payable to Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL MANAGER'S CHECK #503172 in the amt of $6,281.25 payable to Rachell Brill, Esq. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503173 in the amt of $4,208 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin, Esq. (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
5830 ORDER approving third report of the Garment Manufacturing workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $16,900.80 ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte for Judge Perez Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
5831 ORDER that the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $772.50 payable to Nora Rodriguez for atty's fees for the month of June ( signed by Judge Hector M. Laffitte for Judge Perez Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/13/1995)
5832 NOTICE of compliance with court opinion and order of contempt by Joe Colon (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
5833 NOTICE of compliance with paragraph 24 of the stipulation of 6/3/95 re: report for the month of June 1995 by Joe Colon (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503197 in the amt of $16,900.80 payable to Fashion Merchandising & Technical Institute. (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503196 in the amt of $772.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of June, 1995. (il) (Entered: 07/21/1995)
5834 3RD QUARTERLY REPORT on activities between 4/1/95 and 6/30/95 by Adm. de Correccion (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
5835 REPLY TO THE 299TH REPORT of the Court Monitor by Adm. de Correccion (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
5836 NOTICE of compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and socio penal staffing by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
5837 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time for 10 dyas to file comments to the 299th report of the Court Monitor, etc. (np) (Entered: 07/17/1995)
5838 MOTION submitting Quarterly Report by FRP Director. (il) (Entered: 07/18/1995)
5839 ORDER Approving Fourth Report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users for the Four−Month Period starting Feb. 1995. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $24,037.02 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/18/1995)
5840 ORDER Approving Fifth Report of the External Education University System Program. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $10,490. payable to

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 195 of 513

07/19/1995 07/20/1995 07/20/1995 07/21/1995 07/21/1995 07/21/1995 07/26/1995 07/26/1995 07/26/1995 07/26/1995 07/27/1995 07/28/1995
07/31/1995 07/31/1995 07/31/1995 07/31/1995 07/31/1995 08/01/1995 08/01/1995

Metropolitan University. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/18/1995)
5841 Designation of Atty Jose E. Fernandez as Alternate Lead Counsel from 7/20−27/95 by Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (il) (Entered: 07/20/1995)
5842 SEVENTY−SIXTH Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 07/21/1995)
5843 Expedited Bail Project's Invoice for the month of June, 1995 in the amt of $69,511.42. (il) (Entered: 07/21/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5841: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/24/1995)
5844 ORDER The Court Monitor shall issue a check in the amt of $16,568.13 payable to Steve J. Martin for expenses covering the period from March 1, 1995 thru May 31, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/26/1995)
5845 MOTION for ext of time until 8/15/95 to file mot in compliance w/Court order dtd 6/15/95, by defts. (il) (Entered: 07/28/1995)
5846 ORDER Approving Court Monitor's Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $167,466.68 covering the period of June 1 thru June 30, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/28/1995)
5847 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor to authorize the use of Fine Funds to support the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (il) (Entered: 07/28/1995)
5848 FOURTH Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop covering the period from June 16 thru July 14, 1995 in the amt of $20,076.00, by Fashion Merchandising & Technical Institute. (il) (Entered: 07/28/1995)
5850 ORDER regarding Segregation Cell Plan and Program Manager Contract and setting hrg for 9/7/95 at 9:00AM re dkt#5723 − Pltfs contempt mot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/31/1995)
5849 ORDER Amending the order approving the fourth report of the Program for the Rehabilitation of Drug Users. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/28/1995)
5851 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay invoice # 5050 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral & Company for services provided during the month of June in relation to accounting for the month of May, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/31/1995)
5852 MOTION submitting the Chief Health Care Coordinator's Correctional Health Program Annual Status Report, by gov't defts., w/two boxes attached. (Boxes were sent to File Room). (il) (Entered: 07/31/1995)
5853 APPLICATION for deposit of fine funds in the amt of $500,000. in fine monies to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 08/01/1995)
5854 SUBMISSION OF Accounting of expenditures of Fine Monies for May and June 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 08/01/1995)
5855 APPLICATION for deposit of funds by defts in the amt of $1,000,000. to replenish fund, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 08/01/1995)
5856 OBJECTION and Comments of defts to the 299th Report of the Court Monitor: Report on defts compliance with the Revised Stipulation w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 08/01/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503239 in the amt of $10,490. payable to Metropolitan University. (il) (Entered: 08/02/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503430 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. for services during the month of May,

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 196 of 513

08/01/1995
08/01/1995
08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/02/1995 08/03/1995 08/03/1995 08/03/1995 08/03/1995 08/03/1995 08/03/1995 08/03/1995 08/07/1995

1995. (il) (Entered: 08/02/1995)
5857 ORDER Approving the Use of Fine Funds to support the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad, covering the months of July, August and Sept. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (cm). (Entered: 08/02/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #503431 in the amt of $24,037.02 payable to Hogares Crea Inc. for services during the month of May, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
5858 ORDER regarding Notice to be distributed to Employees and Agents of AOC. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/02/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5800: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5791: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5807: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5802: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5847: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5848: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5852: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5843: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5842: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5795: The stipulation is hereby approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
5859 MOTION req. instruction, by defts. (il) (Entered: 08/03/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5856: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5829: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5854: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5855: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5853: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
5860 ORDER Confirming 298th Report of the Court Monitor regarding Open−Celling. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
5861 ORDER Approving the Stipulation concerning a Roster Management System. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/04/1995)
5862 MOTION to req that defts state alternative findings to go with their objections to the 299th Report of the Court Monitor, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 197 of 513

08/07/1995 08/07/1995 08/07/1995 08/07/1995 08/08/1995 08/09/1995 08/09/1995 08/09/1995
08/09/1995 08/09/1995 08/09/1995 08/09/1995 08/10/1995 08/10/1995 08/10/1995 08/10/1995
08/10/1995
08/10/1995 08/10/1995
08/10/1995
08/11/1995 08/11/1995

5863 MOTION to reset hrg scheduled for Sept. 7, 1995, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1995)
5864 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $812.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1995)
5865 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,120. payable to Atty Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1995)
5866 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraphs 20−23 of the Stipulation Regarding Classification by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/08/1995)
5874 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,963.04 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
5867 MOTION informing compliance w/Paragraph 24 of the Stipulation of June 3, 1995, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
5868 MOTION informing compliance with Paragraph 3 and 7 of the Stipulation concerning a Roster Management System by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
5869 INFORMATIVE mot advising that defts have concluded that cancellation of a Req for Proposals for Technical Assistance that had been issued by the Administration of Correction shall serve the best interests of the pts in this matter, by defts. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
5870 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $825. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
5871 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses during the month of July, 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
5872 MOTION for ext of time to file comments regarding the Program Manager Contract by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
5873 APPLICATION req. an ext of time to file comments on the Program Manager Contract by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 08/10/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5845: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5866: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
5875 MOTION submitting payment for the Expedited Bail Project Account in the amt of $54,173.04 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
5876 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $12,016.94 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5863: The hrg set for 9/7/95 shall commence at 1:00PM. If not concluded on said date it shall continue on 9/26/95 at 9:00AM. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
5877 ORDER Setting hrg regarding objections to Attorney Fee Applications for 8/31/95 at 5:00PM. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
5878 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,963.04 payable to atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of July, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
5879 ORDER Approving the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $114,867.93 covering the period of July 1 through July 31, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/11/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #526842 in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (il) (Entered: 08/14/1995)
5880 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $812.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of July, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 198 of 513

08/11/1995 08/11/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/15/1995 08/16/1995 08/16/1995 08/17/1995 08/17/1995 08/18/1995
08/18/1995 08/18/1995 08/18/1995 08/18/1995 08/18/1995 08/18/1995 08/18/1995 08/18/1995

Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/14/1995)
5881 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,120. payable to atty Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of July, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/14/1995)
5882 ORDER Directing defts to file proposed alternative findings. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/14/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5875: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/16/1995)
5883 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,016.94 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of July, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/16/1995)
5884 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing w/attachs., by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/16/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 526907 in the amt of $1,963.04 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/16/1995)
Civ. Case #95−1849 (PG) is ordered consolidated with this case as per instructions of Judge Perez−Gimenez. (il) (Entered: 08/16/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5838: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/17/1995)
5885 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $20,076. to the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute covering the period from June 16 to July 14, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/17/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 526955 in the amt of $3,120. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/22/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 526954 in the amt of $12,016.94 payable to Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/22/1995)
Upon Judge Perez−Gimenez' req. the following boxes were delivered to the Court Monitor: Pltf exhb. 14,16,17, Rollos Bayamon 1 to 4, Vega Alta l, Arecibo 1, Humacao 1, Photos Env. (22) 8.1 to 8.22, Miramar, Arecibo, Humacao, USM. (il) (Entered: 08/18/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #526998 in the amt of $20,076. payable to Fashion Merchandising for the fourth report. (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5884: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 5867: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5868: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5869: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5873: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5872: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
5886 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $825. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of July, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 199 of 513

08/18/1995 08/21/1995
08/22/1995 08/22/1995 08/22/1995 08/22/1995 08/22/1995 08/22/1995 08/22/1995 08/22/1995 08/23/1995 08/23/1995 08/23/1995 08/23/1995 08/23/1995
08/24/1995 08/24/1995
08/25/1995 08/25/1995 08/28/1995 08/28/1995 08/28/1995

Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
5887 COMMENTS of the Court Monitor regarding the Proposed Program Manager Contract filed on 6/29/95. (il) (Entered: 08/21/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #526956 in the amt of $812.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/22/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5887: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5837: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5835: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5834: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5833: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5832: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5836: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5862: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/23/1995)
5888 MOTION for opposition to pltfs req for contempt for failure to comply with FRCP stipulation and others by J. Galib, FRP Director. (il) (Entered: 08/24/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5888: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/24/1995)
5889 SUBMISSION of Reviewed Financial Statements for the Fiscal Year ending March 31, 1995 by Court Monitor w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 08/24/1995)
FIFTH Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop covering the period of July 18th thru Aug. 17, 1995 in the amt of $23,183.20. (il) (Entered: 08/24/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK# 527063 in the amt of $825. payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 08/25/1995)
5890 DESIGNATION of Atty Jose Fernandez Sein as Alternate Lead Counsel by Atty Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 08/25/1995)
5891 304th REPORT of the Court Monitor − Report on Defts state of compliance with the Stipulation regarding Classification w/Vols I and II attached. (il) (Entered: 08/25/1995)
5892 SUBMISSION of Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for July 1995, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 08/28/1995)
5893 MOTION submitting Comments to the Proposed Program Manager Contract by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 08/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5889: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/29/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #5890: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/29/1995)
5894 Notice of Atty appearance by Mercedes Trigo Ferraiuoli on behalf of gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/29/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 200 of 513

08/28/1995
08/29/1995 08/29/1995 08/31/1995
08/31/1995 09/01/1995 09/01/1995 09/01/1995 09/01/1995
09/07/1995 09/07/1995 09/07/1995 09/07/1995 09/07/1995 09/08/1995 09/08/1995
09/08/1995
09/08/1995
09/11/1995 09/11/1995 09/11/1995

5895 AMENDMENT to Objections and Comments of Defts to the 299th Report of the Court Monitor: Report on Defts Compliance with the Revised Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/29/1995)
5896 INFORMATIVE motion regarding the Expedited Bail Project's July, 1995 Invoice in the amt of $64,127.63 by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 08/30/1995)
5897 Seventy−Seven Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 08/30/1995)
5898 Application for Permission to Pay Merit Bonus to Acting Executive Director of the Expedited Bail Project Ms. Ivette Colon the amt of $2,000., by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 09/01/1995)
5899 MOTION to withdraw objections to pltfs applications for attys fees, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/01/1995)
5900 MOTION for ext of time for defts to file amended motion and to reset hrg set for 9/7/95 by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1995)
5901 MOTION of Marshal D. Morgan for admission Pro−Hac−Vice on behalf of gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1995)
5902 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,305.99 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1995)
5903 MOTION in compliance with Court order of August 2, 1995, "Order Approving Stipulation Concerning a Roster Management System", by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5896: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5893: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5894: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/08/1995)
5904 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $806. payable to Atty Jose Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/08/1995)
5905 MOTION req ext of time until 9/15/95 to file response to Court Monitor's 302nd Report by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/08/1995)
5906 MOTION for ext of time of 9 days to file a response to the 304th Report of the Court Monitor, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/11/1995)
5907 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $7,923.65 payable to atty Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/11/1995)
5908 ORDER Approving Fifth Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $23,183.80. The Clerk shall issue check. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/11/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #527379 in the amt of $500,000. payable to Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 09/13/1995)
5909 ITEMIZED STATEMENT OF MONITOR'S TIME AND EXPENSES covering the period of July 31 through August 31, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/12/1995)
5910 MOTION informing Compliance with Paragraph 24 of the Stipulation of June 3, 1995, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/12/1995)
5911 DESIGNATION of Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein as Alternate Lead Counsel from 9/9−9/12/95, by Atty Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 09/12/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 201 of 513

09/11/1995 09/12/1995
09/12/1995 09/12/1995 09/13/1995 09/13/1995 09/13/1995 09/14/1995 09/14/1995 09/14/1995 09/18/1995 09/18/1995 09/19/1995 09/19/1995 09/19/1995 09/19/1995 09/19/1995 09/19/1995 09/21/1995

5912 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $4,375. payable to atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/12/1995)
5913 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,923.65 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of August, 1995. ( signed by Judge Laffitte for Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 09/13/1995 (Entered: 09/13/1995)
5914 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,375. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of August, 1995. ( signed by Judge Laffitte for Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 09/13/1995 (Entered: 09/13/1995)
5915 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,305.99 payable to Atty Harry Anduze Montano for expenses during the month of August, 1995. ( signed by Judge Laffitte for Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/13/1995)
5916 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $810. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/14/1995)
5917 ORDER Defts are to deposit the sum of $60,109.22 with the Clerk of the Court for deposit into the fine fund. ( signed by Judge Laffitte for Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/14/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #5278493 in the amt of $23,183.80 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1995)
5918 MOTION for disbursement of expert fees in the amt of $18,766.62 payable to Steve J. Martin for expenses during June lst thru August 31, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/18/1995)
5919 MOTION submitting payment for the Expedited Bail Project Account in the amt of $53,272.26 ck#01375416 receipt #78094, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/18/1995)
5920 SUBMISSION of Financial Statements for the Expedited Bail Project as of June, 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 09/18/1995)
5921 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1995)
5922 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $16,780.48 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #527571 in the amt of $7,923.65 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/20/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #527569 in the amt of $4,375. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/20/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #527570 in the amt of $2,305.99 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/20/1995)
5923 EIGHTH−QUARTERLY Report of the Health Care Executive Committee (il) (Entered: 09/20/1995)
5924 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $810. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of August, 1995. ( signed by Judge Dominguez for Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/20/1995)
5925 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $806. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of August, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/20/1995)
5926 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $16,780.48 payable to atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of August, 1995. ( signed by Judge Laffitte for Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 202 of 513

09/21/1995
09/21/1995 09/21/1995 09/21/1995
09/22/1995 09/22/1995 09/22/1995 09/25/1995 09/26/1995 09/26/1995 09/26/1995 09/26/1995 09/26/1995 09/26/1995 09/26/1995 09/26/1995 09/27/1995 09/27/1995
09/27/1995
09/28/1995 09/29/1995
09/29/1995

5927 RESPONSE to the 302nd Report of the Court Monitor − Report on compliance with the Stipulation regarding the Facilities Rehabilitation Program by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)
5928 MOTION req. exttime until 9/21/95 to file response to the 302nd Report of the Court Monitor − by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)
5929 PROPOSED Alternative Findings to the 304th Report of the Court Monitor − by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)
5930 SIXTH Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute for the period covering August 21st thru Sept. 19, l995 in the amt of $26,258.40. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)
5931 SUBMISSION of Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for the Morales Feliciano Account by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)
5932 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's August, 1995 invoice in the amt of $57,577.36 by I. Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)
5933 Seventy−Eight Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by I Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1995)
5934 MOTION to vacate hrg setting, by pts. (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5931: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5929: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5928: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5927: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5930: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5933: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5932: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
5935 APPLICATION for employment of office administrator for Emily Miranda Padilla at an annual salary of $25,050. by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5934: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
5936 ORDER Approving application for permission to pay merit bonus to the acting Executive Director of the EBP. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/28/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 527795 in the amt of $40. payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia and BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #527765 in the amt of $16,740.48 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of August, 1995. (il) (Entered: 09/29/1995)
5937 APPLICATION for use of Fine Monies to Pay Expenses in Connection with meeting of OCM Staff by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 09/29/1995)
5938 MOTION for ext of time until 12/4/95 to re−file mot to modify previous Court orders; modify Revised Stipulation to delete paragraphs III.B.4 and revise paragraph III.B.1 and to object Findings of the 296th Report of the Court Monitor by defts. (il) Modified on 10/02/1995 (Entered: 10/02/1995)
5939 303rd REPORT of the Court Monitor−Second Report on Compliance with the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and So ciopenal Staffing (2 Vols) by Court Monitor.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 203 of 513

10/03/1995
10/03/1995 10/03/1995 10/03/1995
10/03/1995
10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995
10/04/1995

(il) (Entered: 10/02/1995)
5940 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amount of $1,338.04 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1995)
5941 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,875.payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1995)
5942 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amount of $15,186.76 payable to atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1995)
5943 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amount of $6,700.85 payabl e to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1995)
5944 DESIGNATION of Alternate Lead Counsel Jose Fernandez Sein during the period of October 3 thru October 18, 1995 by Atty Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5921: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5920: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5919: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5923: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5906: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5905: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5903: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5900: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5911: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5910: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5909: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5899: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5898: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5901: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5937: The application is hereby approved and Fine Monies can be expended to pay the expenses in connection with the meeting of OCM staff and experts in the amt of $3,872.94. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5938: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 204 of 513

10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/04/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995
10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/05/1995 10/06/1995 10/06/1995

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5935: The application is approved retroactive to June 12, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5918: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
5945 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,338.04 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
5946 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,232. payable to atty Jose Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
5947 APPLICATION for Permission to expend Fine Monies to Support the Roster Management Committee by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
5948 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,218.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/05/1995)
5949 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral for invoice covering July, 1995 in relation to accounting for the month of June,1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5950 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral for services during the month of August, 1995 in relation to accounting transactions for July, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5951 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,700.85 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5952 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $15,186.76 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of September, 1995 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5953 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,875. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5954 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $25. payable to Banco Santander covering custody services for the period of Feb. to July, 1995.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5955 REQUEST for Modification of the March 30, 1994 Order authorizing an increase in the Allocation of Funds for the Operating Expenses of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon. (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5956 MOTION in compliance with Court order and statement under penalty by Joseph F. Colon. (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5957 MOTION for ext of time until 10/13/95 to respond to defts objections and proposed alternative findings to the 302nd and 304th Report of the Court Monitor by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5958 4TH QUARTERLY Report of the Corrections Compliance Coordinator Report on Activities between July lst and September 30th, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5959 APPLICATION of atty fees in the amt of $1,935. payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/06/1995)
5960 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $637.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/10/1995)
5961 ORDER Approving the Sixth Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $26,258.40 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 205 of 513

10/10/1995 10/10/1995 10/10/1995
10/10/1995
10/10/1995
10/10/1995
10/10/1995 10/10/1995 10/10/1995
10/11/1995 10/11/1995 10/11/1995
10/11/1995 10/12/1995 10/13/1995
10/13/1995
10/13/1995 10/13/1995 10/13/1995 10/16/1995

10/10/1995)
5962 MOTION informing Compliance with Paragraph 24 of the Stipulation of June 3, 1995 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528034 in the amt of $25. payable to Banco Santander. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528032 in the amt of $3,250. payable to Vila del Coral and Company covering the months of June and July, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528031 in the amt of $6,700.85 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528030 in the amt of $1,875. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528029 in the amt of $15,186.76 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
5963 MOTION informing Compliance with Paragraph 7 of the Stipulation concerning Roster Management System by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
5964 MOTION enclosing Quarterly Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plans purs to March 30, l990 order, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528033 in the amt of $1,338.04 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5965 ITEMIZED Statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses during the month of September, 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
5966 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP Account in the amt of $296,660.93 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
5967 MOTION submitting payment to replenish the Fund established for the payment of fees and expenses incurred by the Court Monitor, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
5968 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP account in the amt of $69,510.92 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/12/1995)
5969 MOTION by the FRP Director introducing the FRP Quarterly Report. (il) (Entered: 10/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 528103 in the amt of $26,258.40 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528104 in the amt of $1,000,000. payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5970 MOTION submitting Deposit in the amt of $60,109.22 for the Fine Fund by gov't defts. Ck#01387928 receipt#78468. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5971 OPPOSITION to Defts mot concerning the 302nd Report and 304th Report of the Court Monitor and req for hrg by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5972 MOTION req ext of time to file a response to the 303rd Report of the Court Monitor, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5973 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 206 of 513

10/16/1995
10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/16/1995
10/16/1995
10/16/1995
10/16/1995
10/16/1995

5974 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's September, 1995 invoice in the amt of $66,539.31, by Ivette Colon, Acting Director, EBP. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5975 SEVENTY−NINTH Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5956: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5957: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5958: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5944: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5962: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#5963: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5963: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5966: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5967: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5968: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5969: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5964: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5947: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5965: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5976 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,232. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5977 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $637.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5978 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,935. payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5979 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,218.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)
5980 ORDER Contingent on no objection, the Court approves the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $123,899. covering the period of July 31 thru August 31, 1995 by Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 207 of 513

10/16/1995
10/16/1995
10/16/1995 10/16/1995 10/20/1995 10/20/1995 10/20/1995 10/20/1995 10/20/1995 10/23/1995
10/23/1995
10/23/1995 10/24/1995 10/24/1995 10/24/1995 10/25/1995 10/25/1995

5981 ORDER Contingent on no objection, the Court approves the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $181,232.10 covering the period of September 1 thru September 30, 1995 by Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)

5982 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for expenses covering the months of Oct, Nov and December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)

5983 ORDER Deft Joe Colon shall continue to make distribution of the required notice, as req by the Court's prior orders, until further order of the Court, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)

5984 ORDER Setting forth additional procedures for objecting to Reports of the Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528371 in the amt of $1,935. payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/24/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528369 in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528368 in the amt of $637.50 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528370 in the amt of $3,218.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528367 in the amt of $2,232. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 10/25/1995)

5985 ORDER The Court hereby directs the appropriate agent of Central Hispano to refuse payment of check #528104 and to issue a replacement check in the amt of $1,000,000. to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/23/1995)

5986

ORDER The Req for Modification of the March 30, 1994 order Authorizing an Increase in the Allocation of Funds for the Operating Expenses of the Expedited Bail Project (dkt#5955) is GRANTED; it is further ordered that the Expedited Bail Project's budget for operating expenses shall be increased, beginning on November 1, 1995 to $130,000. for each two−month period, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/24/1995)

5987 MOTION OBJECTING to Finding #32 of the 303rd REPORT of the Court Monitor, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/24/1995)

5988 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Coral for invoice #5410 for services during the month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/25/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528449 in the amt of $1,000,000. payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 10/26/1995)

5993 ORDER Consolidating Civ. 94−2735 with Civ. 79−4(PG). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/31/1995)

5989 MOTION submitting Rosser's Contracts for Program Management and Technical Assistance by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 10/26/1995)

5990 SEVENTH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $22,654. covering the period from 9−19 − 10/l8/95. (il) (Entered: 10/26/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 208 of 513

10/25/1995 10/25/1995
10/27/1995 11/01/1995 11/01/1995 11/02/1995
11/02/1995 11/02/1995
11/03/1995
11/06/1995 11/06/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995 11/07/1995

5991 ORDER The clerk is ordered to enter the 302nd Report of the Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/26/1995)
5992 302nd REPORT of the Court Monitor − Report on Compliance with the Stipulation regarding the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (Vol. 1 & 2) − filed on 8/24/95. (il) (Entered: 10/26/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #528513 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. (il) (Entered: 11/01/1995)
5994 MOTION enclosing Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans, by gov't defts (2 vols.) (il) (Entered: 11/01/1995)
5995 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,750. for atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/02/1995)
5996 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee and The Court Monitor to extend funding for the Sistema de Educacion Externa Program at Administration of Correction Penal Institutions. (il) (Entered: 11/03/1995)
5997 APPLICATION for Atty Fees in the amt of $2,771.24 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/03/1995)
5998 Recommendation of the Special Advisory Committee and the Court Monitor to Authorize the Use of Fine Funds to Support a Chaplaincy Program in Administration of Correction Facilities. (il) (Entered: 11/03/1995)
5999 RESPONSE to Court's order entitled Order setting forth additional procedures for Objecting to Reports of the Court Monitor dtd 10/13/95, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 11/06/1995)
6000 APPLICATION to continue Reimbursement of Barrell and Associates Inc., by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 11/06/1995)
6001 ITEMIZED Statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses covering the period of Oct. lst thru Oct. 31, l995. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5987: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5989: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5972: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5970: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5973: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 5974: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5975: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 5990: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
6002 MOTION in compliance with Court order dtd 7−7−95 and 8−2−95 and statement under penalty of perjury by Joseph Colon w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
6003 MOTION submitting deposit in the amt of $168,853.15 for the Special Fund by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
6004 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $1,199.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 209 of 513

11/07/1995 11/08/1995 11/08/1995 11/08/1995 11/13/1995 11/13/1995 11/13/1995
11/16/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/17/1995 11/20/1995 11/20/1995

6005 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $810. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/08/1995)
6006 APPLICATION for Atty fees in the amt of $2,250. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/09/1995)
6007 APPLICATION for Atty Fees in the amt of $5,896.40 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/09/1995)
6008 APPLICATION for Atty Fees in the amt of $6,231.35 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/09/1995)
6009 SUBMISSION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for August and September, 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 11/14/1995)
6010 MOTION informing Compliance w/Paragraph 24 of the Stipulation of June 3, 1995 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 11/14/1995)
6011 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,654. to the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute covering the period of September 19 thru October 18, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/14/1995)
6012 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,199.75 payable to atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of October, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6010: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6009: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6003: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6001: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6002 : Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
6013 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $810. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of October, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
6014 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $5,896.40 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
6015 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,231.35 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of October, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
6016 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,250. payable to atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of October, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #538938 in the amt of $22,654.00 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute. (il) (Entered: 11/20/1995)
6017 ORDER Approving the Use of Fine Funds for the Sistema de Educacion Universitaria Externa (SEDUE) Program for the 1995−1996 Academic Year ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1995)
6018 ORDER Approving the Use of Find Funds to Support a Chaplaincy Program in Administration of Correction Institutions. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 210 of 513

11/21/1995 11/21/1995 11/21/1995 11/21/1995 11/21/1995 11/21/1995 11/21/1995 11/22/1995 11/27/1995 11/27/1995 11/27/1995 11/27/1995 11/27/1995 11/28/1995 11/28/1995 11/28/1995 11/28/1995 11/29/1995 11/29/1995 11/29/1995

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 5994: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 5999: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6000: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1995)
6019 ORDER The Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses submitted by the Court Monitor for the month of October, 1995 in the amt of $92,422.46 is hereby approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1995)
6020 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,771.24 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of October, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1995)
6021 EIGHTY FINANCIAL REPORT of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1995)
6022 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's October, 1995 Invoice in the amt of $53,491.15 by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1995)
6023 INFORMATIVE mot advising that Messrs. William Korber and Adolfo Valdes are to be added to the group responsible for the preparation of impact statements by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 11/28/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 565522 in the amt of $2,250. payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/28/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #565521 in the amt of $5,896.40 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/28/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 565523 in the amt of $6,231.35 payable to Atty Carlos V. Gutierrez for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/28/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #565520 in the amt of $810. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #565519 in the amt of $1,199.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6022: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/29/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6021: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/29/1995)
6024 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,750. payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of October, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/29/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #565546 in the amt of $2,771.24 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of October, 1995. (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #565574 in the amt of $15,076,631.55 payable to Paine Webber Inc. (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
6025 MOTION to submit corrected use of Force Policies and Procedures, to request order and to provide for alternate relief by pts. (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
6026 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 211 of 513

11/29/1995 11/29/1995
11/29/1995 11/30/1995 11/30/1995 12/01/1995 12/01/1995 12/01/1995
12/04/1995 12/04/1995 12/04/1995 12/04/1995 12/04/1995 12/04/1995 12/05/1995 12/05/1995 12/05/1995 12/05/1995 12/06/1995
12/06/1995
12/06/1995
12/06/1995

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6023: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
6027 ORDER for disbursement to Paine Webber Inc the amt of $15,076,631.55 for investment in US securities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
6028 ORDER for investment transaction with Paine Webber Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/30/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6026: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/01/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6025: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/01/1995)
6029 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $1,584. for atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6030 MOTION submitting Progress Report for the State Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file the Report in Spanish by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6031 EIGHTH Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $35,330.40 covering the period from Oct 19 − Nov. 17, 1995 by Rita Colon. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6032 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $6,180.08 for atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6033 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $2,437.50 payable to atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6034 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $641.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6035 MOTION for summary jdmt (in Spanish) by Efrain Ortiz Vega. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6035: DENIED. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6036 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6037 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $7,656.32 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6038 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $1,302.88 payable to atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6039 MOTION in compliance with Court order and statement under penalty of perjury by Joseph F. Colon. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6040 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $2,375. payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1995)
6041 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,437.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/08/1995)
6042 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,878.32 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/08/1995)
6043 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,656.32 payable to Atty Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/08/1995)
6044 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,302.88 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/08/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 212 of 513

12/07/1995 12/07/1995 12/08/1995 12/08/1995 12/08/1995 12/08/1995 12/08/1995 12/11/1995 12/12/1995 12/12/1995 12/12/1995 12/12/1995 12/12/1995 12/12/1995 12/13/1995 12/13/1995 12/13/1995 12/13/1995 12/14/1995 12/14/1995

6045 MOTION submitting payment for the EPB Account in the amt of $66,539.31 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 12/08/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #566701 in the amt of $2,750. payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/08/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6036: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/12/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6039: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/12/1995)
6046 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $641.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/12/1995)
6047 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,375. payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/12/1995)
6048 ORDER Approving the Use of Force Policies and Procedures submitted, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/12/1995)
6049 INFORMATIVE mot re FRP Stipulation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 12/12/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #566784 in the amt of $2,375. payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #566785 in the amt of $641.75 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #566786 in the amt of $1,302.88 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/13/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #566789 in the amt of $2,437.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of Nov. 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #566788 in the amt of $7,656.32 payable to atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of Nov. 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #566787 in the amt of $22,878.32 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of Nov. 1995. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)
6050 ORDER relieving administrator of obligation to distribute notices to employees and agents (Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez) (kd) (Entered: 12/14/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6049: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6045: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)
6051 ITEMIZED STATEMENT OF Monitor's Time and Expenses in the amt of $82,997.54 covering the period of Nov. 1, l995 thru Dec. 4, 1995, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)
6052 MOTION in Compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6030: Noted and Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 213 of 513

12/14/1995 12/14/1995
12/14/1995 12/14/1995 12/14/1995
12/14/1995 12/14/1995
12/14/1995
12/15/1995 12/15/1995 12/15/1995 12/19/1995 12/19/1995 12/19/1995 01/02/1996 01/02/1996 01/02/1996 01/03/1996

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6029: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6053 ORDER Contingent no objection by pts, the Court hereby approves the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $82,997.54 submitted by Court Monitor covering the period from Nov. 1 thru Dec. 4, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6054 ORDER Granting defts objections to the 299th Report of the Court Monitor, confirming defts' proposed alternative findings and confirming in part the 299th Report. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6055 ORDER granting defts' objection to finding 32 of the 303rd Report of the Court Monitor, confirming defts' proposed alternative finding and confirming in part the 303rd Report. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6056 ORDER directing defts' to reimburse the fine fund for atty fees and expenses advanced from April 1, 1995 thru September, 1995 in the amt of $159,384.60 to be deposited with the Court. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6057 ORDER Confirming the 304th Report of the Court Monitor − Report on defts' state of compliance with the Stipulation regarding classification ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6058

ORDER defts' objections to the 302nd report's findings 16,19,21,33,34,78,80,81,83 and 87 are overruled. Pltfs and defts are granted 15 days to object, seek a hrg or both, etc., as stated herein. Pltfs req for a hrg in relation to the 302nd Report's original findings 14 and 77 is overruled. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6059 ORDER Approving the Eighth Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $35,330.40 for the period of Oct. 19 thru Nov. 17, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6060 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6061 EIGHTY−ONE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6062 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's November, 1995 invoice in the amt of $65,063.10 by Ivette Colon Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 12/18/1995)

6063 MOTION to dismiss w/brief in support thereof by Parole Board in Civ. 94−2735. (il) (Entered: 12/20/1995)

6064 SUBMISSION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for October and November, 1995 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 12/20/1995)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #579047 in the amt of $35,330.40 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute for the Eighth Report. (il) (Entered: 12/21/1995)

6065 ORDER Approving the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $79,832.44 covering the period of December 1 thru December 31, 1995 of the Court Monitor. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/04/1996)

6066 MOTION for disbursement of Expert Fees to Steven Martin in the amt of $22,808.02 covering the period from September 1st thru November 30, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/04/1996)

6067 MOTION enclosing Quarterly Maintenance and Environmental Audits and Corrective Action Plans by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 01/04/1996)

6068 REPORT on the USE of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering months of October, November and December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/04/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 214 of 513

01/03/1996 01/03/1996 01/03/1996 01/04/1996 01/04/1996 01/04/1996 01/04/1996 01/04/1996 01/05/1996 01/05/1996 01/05/1996 01/05/1996 01/08/1996
01/08/1996
01/08/1996
01/08/1996 01/08/1996 01/08/1996 01/10/1996
01/10/1996
01/10/1996

6069 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $540. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/04/1996)
6070 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $2,531.25 payable to Atty Luis Villaronga for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/04/1996)
6071 ITEMIZED Statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses in the amt of $79,832.44 covering the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/04/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6060: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/05/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6061: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/05/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6052: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/05/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6062: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/05/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6064: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/05/1996)
6072 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,772.64 payable to atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
6073 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,062.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
6074 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $15,971.09 payable to atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
6075 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP account in the amt of $53,491.15 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
6076 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $540. payable to atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
6077 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,772.64 payable to atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
6078 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,531.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6068: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6067: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6066: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/09/1996)
6079 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice No. 5467 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral & Company for services provided during October, 1995 in relation to the accounting month of September, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/10/1996)
6080 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for advance expenses during the months of Jan, Feb and March, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/11/1996)
6081 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $4,844.15 payable to atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 215 of 513

01/10/1996 01/10/1996 01/10/1996 01/10/1996 01/11/1996 01/11/1996 01/11/1996 01/12/1996 01/12/1996 01/16/1996 01/16/1996 01/16/1996 01/16/1996 01/16/1996 01/17/1996 01/17/1996 01/17/1996 01/19/1996
01/19/1996

6082 NINETH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $18,849.60 for the period from Nov. 21 thru December 22, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #579420 in the amt of $1,772.64 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #579421 in the amt of $540. payable to Atty Jose Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #579419 in the amt of $2,531.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6075: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 579503 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral for services provided in October, 1995 for the accounting of September, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
6083 MOTION for ext of time to answer or otherwise plead in Civ. 95−1412, by deft Adm. de Correccion. (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
6087 MOTION submitting Deposit for the Special Fund in the amt of $159,384.60 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #579520 in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for expenses covering January − March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6082: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
6084 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $15,971.09 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
6085 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,062.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
6086 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,844.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/16/1996)
6088 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing, by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 579599 in the amt of $15,971.09 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 579601 in the amt of $1,062.50 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 579600 in the amt of $4,844.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 01/19/1996)
6089 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: report detailing the current balance of the Accounts required under paragraphs 22 amd 23 and all activity in these accounts for the month of December was sent to the appropiate parties according to parragraph 24 of the FRP stipulation.. (mr) (Entered: 01/22/1996)
6090 ORDER regarding the 302nd report of the Court Monitor: Findings 14 and 77 amended in the 12/13/95 order are confirmed and adopted. Findings 1−13, 15−76

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 216 of 513

01/22/1996
01/22/1996 01/22/1996 01/22/1996 01/23/1996 01/24/1996
01/24/1996 01/24/1996 01/24/1996 01/24/1996
01/25/1996 01/25/1996 01/25/1996 01/25/1996 01/25/1996
01/30/1996 01/30/1996

and 78−87 are confirmed and adopted. Pltf's req for a hearing re: 302nd report's objected−to findings is denied as moot (etc., as stated herein) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/22/1996)

6091

ORDER directing final judgment against defts in their official capacities as to pltf's equitable claims with respect to medical and mental case; environmental deficiencies; mal−administration contributing to unconstitutional conditions; excessive use of force; classification of prisoners; security and overcrowding (etc., as stated herein) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/22/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6088: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/23/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6087: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/23/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6083: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/23/1996)

6092 ANNUAL REPORT on the use of fine funds by Special Advisory Committee (np) (Entered: 01/24/1996)

6093

PARTIAL JUDGMENT in favor of the plffs and against the defts in their official capacities as to plffs' equitable claims with respect to medical and mental health care, environmental deficiencies, mal−administration contributing to unconstitutional conditions, excessive use of force, classification of prisoners, security, and overcrowding ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 01/24/1996)

6094 EIGHTY−TWO Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6095 INVOICE for Operating Costs for the month of December, 1995 in the amt of $55,964.25 by Ivette Colon, Acting Director of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6096 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP in the amt of $65,063.10 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6097 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,849.60 payable to the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute covering the period from November 21st thru December 22, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6098 SUBMISSION of Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for Morales Feliciano Account for the year ended September 30, 1995 by Vila del Corral and Company. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6099 NINTH Quarterly Report of the Health Care Executive Committee by V. Nathan, Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6100 MOTION submitting Plan and Schedule for the Implementation of the Use of Force Policies and Procedures by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6101 JOINT motion waiving the right to appeal partial jdmt, by pts. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6101: The Court having considered the information provided herein recognizes the pts waiver of their right to appeal the partial jdmt entered on 1−24−96. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6102 APPLICATION to continue Reimbursement of Barrell and Associates Inc., by V. Nathan, Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6063: Granted. The action against the herein defts is dismissed − Civ. 94−2735. Jdmt to be entered accordingly. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 217 of 513

01/30/1996
02/02/1996 02/02/1996 02/02/1996 02/05/1996 02/05/1996 02/05/1996 02/06/1996 02/06/1996 02/06/1996 02/06/1996 02/07/1996 02/07/1996 02/12/1996 02/12/1996 02/12/1996 02/12/1996 02/13/1996 02/13/1996 02/13/1996

6103

JUDGMENT The Court having entered an order on this same date granting defts mot to dismiss in Civ. 94−2735(PG). Jdmt is hereby entered dismissing this action with prejudice as to co−defts Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and the Correctional Administration of the Commonwealth of PR. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/01/1996)

6104 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,500. for atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6105 ITEMIZED Statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses for the period of December 27th thru January 31, 1996, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6106 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,210.24 for atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6107 SUBMISSION of Accounting Expenditures of Fine Monies for the month of December, 1995, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6108 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $360. for atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580033 in the amt of $18,849.60 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute re: payment of 9th Report. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6109 NOTICE of change of address of Atty Steven J. Martin (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6110 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $14,155.78 for atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6111 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,887.80 for atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6112 10TH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop covering the period of December 26, 1995 thru January 19, 1996 in the amt of $15,622.60 by Rita Colon (il) (Entered: 02/07/1996)

6113 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,887.80 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of January, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1996)

6114 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $14,155.78 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of January, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/08/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580183 in the amt of $3,887.80 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580184 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia in the amt of $14,155.78 for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1996)

6115 MOTION submitting Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1996)

6121 MOTION in compliance with Court order dtd 1−24−96, by deft Joseph Colon. (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)

6116 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1996)

6117 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the FRP Stipulation, by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1996)

6118 Expedited Bail Project's January, 1996 Invoice in the amt of $66,188.28 by I. Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 218 of 513

02/13/1996 02/13/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/16/1996 02/20/1996 02/21/1996
02/21/1996 02/21/1996
02/21/1996

6119 Eighty−Three Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 02/14/1996)
6120 APPLICATION for Atty fees in the amt of $1,031.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/15/1996)
6122 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall issue a check in the amt of $360. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of January, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6107: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
6123 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,210.24 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6105: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
6124 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,500. payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of January, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6115: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
6125 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,031.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of January, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6117: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6116: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6118: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6119: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6112: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6109: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/16/1996)
6126 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,584. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 02/21/1996)
6127 ORDER Approving the Tenth Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of 15,622.60 for the period of Dec. 26 thru Jan. 19, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/21/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580347 in the amt of $1,210.24 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/22/1996)
6128 MOTION submitting The Rosser International Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program and the Approval of such plan by the Governor's Personal Representative in accordance with Paragraphs 5 & 6 of the FRP Stipulation by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/22/1996)
6129 ORDER Approving the Court Monitor's Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $81,745.69 covering the period of December 27 thru January 31, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/22/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 219 of 513

02/21/1996
02/21/1996
02/21/1996
02/22/1996
02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996 02/22/1996
02/22/1996
02/23/1996 02/23/1996 02/23/1996 02/23/1996 02/26/1996 02/27/1996

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580348 in the amt of $360. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580350 in the amt of $1,500. payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 580349 in the amt of $1,031.25 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of January, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6130 MOTION submitting the Updated Annual Population Projection in Accordance with Paragraph 3 of the Stipulation regarding Population Management and a Pilot Project at Ponce, by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6099: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6098: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6096: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6095: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6092: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6094: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6121: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6100: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6102: The application is hereby approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
6131 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,584. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/23/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580393 in the amt of $15,622.60 payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute re: 10th Report. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6128: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6132 INFORMATIVE mot advising that Miramar Young Adult facility has been closed due to serious structural defects, by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6133 ORDER Referring case Civ. 96−1038(RLA) for possible consolidation with Civ. 79−4. ( signed by Judge Raymond L. Acosta ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6134 ORDER Referring case Civ. 95−25359(RLA) for possible consolidation with Civ. 79−4. ( signed by Judge Raymond L. Acosta ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6135 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6136 ELEVENTH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop in the amt of $19,530. for the period of January 22 thru February 21, 1996 by Rita Colon. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 220 of 513

02/27/1996 02/27/1996 03/01/1996 03/04/1996 03/05/1996 03/05/1996 03/05/1996 03/05/1996 03/05/1996 03/05/1996 03/06/1996
03/07/1996 03/07/1996 03/07/1996 03/07/1996 03/07/1996 03/07/1996 03/07/1996 03/07/1996 03/07/1996

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580490 in the amt of $1,584. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of November, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6137 ORDER Authorizing reimbursement of Barrell and Associates Inc ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6138 INFORMATIVE mot regarding Lock Shops by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6139 ORDER Regarding the Implementation of the Use of Force Policies and Procedures. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6140 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $510. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6141 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,336.36 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6142 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $18,069.15 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6143 APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $1,281.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6130: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6151 MOTION to dismiss w/brief in support thereof by Joseph Colon in Civ. 95−1412. (il) (Entered: 03/11/1996)
6144 ORDER for payment of Services to Vila del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625. invoice #5704 and $2,250. invoice #5607 for accounting months of November and December, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1996)
6145 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,336.36 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1996)
6146 ORDER EBP is to transfer to the clerk of the Court all monies constituting interest earned to date on the $3,250,000. in fine monies held, etc. , as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/07/1996)
6147 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $510. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of February, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1996)
6148 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,069.15 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of February, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1996)
6149 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,281.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of February, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/08/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 580716 in the amt of $3,875. payable to Vila del Coral and Co. for accounting services during the months of November and December, 1995. (il) (Entered: 03/08/1996)
6150 MOTION to withdraw as atty of record of defts, by Atty Gloria Rivera Carrero DOJ (il) (Entered: 03/08/1996)
6152 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,120. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/11/1996)
6153 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $656.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/11/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 221 of 513

03/07/1996 03/11/1996 03/11/1996
03/11/1996
03/11/1996
03/11/1996
03/12/1996
03/12/1996
03/13/1996 03/14/1996 03/14/1996 03/14/1996 03/14/1996
03/14/1996 03/14/1996
03/14/1996 03/14/1996 03/14/1996 03/15/1996 03/15/1996
03/18/1996

6154 ITEMIZED statement of Monitor's Time and Expenses covering the period of February 5−29, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/11/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6150: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/12/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 580782 in the amt of $1,336.36 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 580781 in the amt of $1, 281.25 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580783 in the amt of $18,069.15 payable to Atty Carlos Garcia for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 580784 in the amt of $510. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1996)
6155 ORDER Contingent on no objection the Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses filed by the Court Monitor in the amt of $84,618.85 is approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/13/1996)
6156 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,120. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/13/1996)
6157 MOTION submitting payment for the EPB Account in the amt of $55,964.25 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/14/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6135: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/14/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6138: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/14/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6132: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/14/1996)
6158 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $656.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of February, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/14/1996)
6159 INFORMATIVE mot regarding FRP Stipulation by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1996)
6160 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Results for leave to file in Spanish by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1996)
6161 EIGHTY−FOUR Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1996)
6162 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S February, 1996 Invoice in the amt of $59,704.74 by Ivette Colon, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 03/15/1996)
6163 MOTION req. approval of the Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
6164 NOMINATION of Angelo Ravelo Garcia to serve as Acting Executive Director of the Expedited Bail Project, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
6165 ORDER Approving Mr. Ravelo Garcia's appointment on the terms and conditions set forth in the application. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6157: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 222 of 513

03/18/1996 03/18/1996 03/18/1996 03/18/1996 03/19/1996
03/20/1996
03/20/1996
03/21/1996 03/21/1996
03/27/1996 03/27/1996 03/27/1996
03/28/1996 03/28/1996 04/02/1996 04/02/1996 04/02/1996 04/02/1996 04/03/1996
04/03/1996
04/03/1996

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6162: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 1634: Civ. Case 95−2535 is consolidated with Civ. 79−4. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6133: Civ. Case 96−1038 is consolidated with 79−4. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
6166 SUBMISSION of Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for January, 1996 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
6167 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $19,530. to the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute covering the Eleventh Report . ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/20/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580987 in the amt of $656.25 payable to Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/26/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #580986 in the amt of $2,120. payable to Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1996. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1996)
6168 MOTION submitting Progress Report for the State Penitentiary Complex and Req for leave to file the Report in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/22/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #582009 in the amt of $19,530. payable to Fashion Merchandising for the eleventh Report. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1996)
6169 TWELVETH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1996)
6170 MOTION submitting Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1996)
6171 MOTION req. Authorization for withdrawal and substitution of attorney of records by Atty Jose A. Fernandez Paoli by Atty Roberto Lefranc Romero representing Carlos Romero Barcelo. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1996)
6172 SUBMISSION of Accounting of Expenditures of Fine Monies for February, 1996 by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1996)
6173 APPLICATION for Deposit of Fine Funds by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 03/29/1996)
6174 APPLICATION for atty fees for the month of March, 1996 for Atty Rachel Brill in the amt of $875. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1996)
6175 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $13,673.47 for expenses during the month of March, 1996 for atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1996)
6176 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $625. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1996)
6177 STIPULATION AND JOINT mot req vacation of order of reference, by pltf class and lead counsel for gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6177: The stipulation is approved. A final order granting the mot filed will follow.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1996)
6178 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering the months of January, February and March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/04/1996)
6179 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,062.50 for atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/04/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 223 of 513

04/04/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996
04/08/1996
04/08/1996
04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996 04/08/1996
04/08/1996
04/08/1996
04/08/1996
04/08/1996 04/09/1996 04/10/1996

6180 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,365.25 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6181 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of Monitor's Time and Expenses covering the period of Feb. 29th thru March 31, 1996, by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6182 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $935.44 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6183 ORDER The clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,365.25 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6184 ORDER The clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $13,673.47 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of March, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6185 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $875. payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of March, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6172: Noted.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6168: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6166: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6163: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6173: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6171: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6169: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6170: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6186 ORDER The clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $935.44 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6187 ORDER the clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,062.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of March, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6188 ORDER the clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $625. payable to Atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for expenses during the month of March, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6189 ORDER Contingent to no objection within ten days of this order, the Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses of the Court Monitor is approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6190 ORDER Approving the Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1996)
6191 MOTION submitting Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/10/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #582465 in the amt of $875. payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/11/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 224 of 513

04/10/1996 04/10/1996 04/10/1996 04/11/1996 04/11/1996 04/11/1996
04/16/1996
04/17/1996 04/17/1996 04/18/1996
04/18/1996
04/18/1996
04/18/1996 04/18/1996 04/18/1996 04/19/1996 04/23/1996 04/23/1996

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #582462 in the amt of $3,365.25 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #582461 in the amt of $13,673.47 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #582466 in the amt of $935.44 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/12/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6191: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/12/1996)
6192 OPINION AND ORDER The Court grants deft Joseph Colon's mot to dismiss (dkt#6151), etc., as stated herein. Partial jdmt to be entered accordingly. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 04/12/1996)
6193 PARTIAL JUDGMENT The Court having entered an O&O on this same date, partial jdmt is hereby entered dismissing the complaint as against co−deft Joseph F. Colon (Civ. 95−1412). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/12/1996)
6194 ORDER Approving Report of Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing Fourth Advancement of Fine Funds. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. to the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/17/1996)
6195 INFORMATIVE mot regarding paragraph 24 of the FRP Stipulation, by defts. w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 04/18/1996)
6196 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/18/1996)
6197 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #5795 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral & Company for services provided in December, 1995 and January, 1996 in relation to the accounting month of November, 1995. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1996)
6198 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #5798 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral & Company for services provided during Feb., 1996 in relation to the accounting month of January, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1996)
6199 ORDER The Clerk shall pay to Banco Central Hispano the amt of $100. covering custody services for the period of September, 1994 to September, 1995 as per invoice #96−068. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #582760 in the amt of $12,000., payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (il) (Entered: 04/23/1996)
6200 EIGHTY−FIVE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 04/23/1996)
6201 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S Invoice for the month of March, 1996 in the amt of $52,947.39, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 04/23/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #582805 in the amt of $3,250. payable to Vila del Corral and Company. (il) (Entered: 04/23/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6196: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/24/1996)
6202 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/24/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 225 of 513

04/23/1996
04/24/1996 04/24/1996
04/25/1996 04/26/1996
04/26/1996 04/30/1996 04/30/1996
05/01/1996 05/02/1996 05/02/1996 05/03/1996 05/06/1996 05/06/1996 05/07/1996
05/07/1996 05/07/1996 05/07/1996 05/10/1996 05/10/1996
05/13/1996 05/14/1996

6203 MOTION for disbursement of expert fees to Steve J. Martin in the amt of $8,339.90 covering the period from December 1st, l995 to March 31, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6195: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/24/1996)
6204 ORDER Approving the 12th Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $16,216.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/26/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6201: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/26/1996)
6205 AMENDED Eighty−Two and Eighty Five Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project purs to Court order dtd 4/28/88, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 05/02/1996)
6206 ORDER Consolidating Civ. 95−2181(PG) with this case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/02/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #585131 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. (il) (Entered: 05/02/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #585132 in the amt of $16,216. payable to Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute. (il) (Entered: 05/02/1996)
6207 THIRTEENTH Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop during March 22 thru April 26, 1996 in the amt of $17,497.20. (il) (Entered: 05/02/1996)
6208 MOTION submitting payment of the accumulated interest from the Expedited Bail Project in the amt of $390,497.28, by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/07/1996)
6209 MOTION submitting Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans, by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/07/1996)
6210 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $837.09 for atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 05/07/1996)
6211 MOTION for an order tht pltfs counsel atty fees and expenses be paid from fine fund, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/07/1996)
6212 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $968.75 payable to atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 05/07/1996)
6213 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $837.09 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of April, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1996)
6214 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $5.00 for atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein for the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 05/10/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6207: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6205: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/10/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6202: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
6215 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the sum of $500,000. from the fine account maintained by the Court to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
6216 LEAD Counsel's second mot on past PLRA Atty fees, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
6217 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $17,497.20 payable to the Institute for the Technical & Occupational Careers, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 226 of 513

05/14/1996 05/15/1996 05/15/1996 05/15/1996 05/16/1996 05/17/1996
05/20/1996 05/20/1996 05/21/1996 05/23/1996 05/23/1996 05/23/1996 05/23/1996 05/23/1996 05/24/1996 05/24/1996 05/24/1996 05/24/1996 05/29/1996

Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #585543 in the amt of $837.09 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
6218 DESIGNATION of Alternate Lead Counsel Jose E. Fernandez from 5/15 − 5/21/96, by Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
6219 JOINT mot purs to Paragraph 13 of the Stipulation and Joint mot req vacation of order of reference by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
6220 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/16/1996)
6221 MOTION submitting revised stipulationes (Spanish) by Efrain Rivera Merced (il) (Entered: 05/17/1996)
6222 ORDER The Joint Compliance Consultant shall issue a check in the amt of $8,339.90 payable to Steve J. Martin for expert fees covering the period from December 1st, 1995 thru March 31, 1996 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #585664 in the amt of $500,000. payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #585665 in the amt of $17,497.20 payable to the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Career Inc. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6223 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP Account in the amt of $125,893.02 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6224 EIGHTY−SIX Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Angelo Ravelo Garcia, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6225 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S Invoice for the month of April, 1996 in the amt of $52,881.21, by Angelo Ravelo Garcia, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6226 Recommendation of the Special Advisory Committee to authorize the Use of Fine Funds to Support the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for a second year, by Special Advisory Committee. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6227 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $24,036. payable to the Metropolitan University covering the l995−l996 Academic Year. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6228 ORDER directing defts to reimburse the Fine Fund for atty fees and expenses advanced from October 1st, 1995 thru March 31, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6229 Application for atty fees for Atty Bruce J. McGiverin in the amt of $4.523.15 for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6230 Application for atty fees for Atty Carlos V. Garcia in the amt of $14,130.68 for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6231 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,523.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of April, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6232 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $14,130.68 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of April, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)
6233 Recommendation of the Special Advisory Committee regarding the use of Fine Funds to run a Chaplaincy program at the Administration of Correction Institutions. (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 227 of 513

05/31/1996 05/31/1996 05/31/1996 06/03/1996 06/03/1996 06/03/1996 06/03/1996 06/03/1996
06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/04/1996 06/05/1996

6234 ORDER Granting the Joint mot req. vacation of order of reference and joint mot purs to paragraph 13 of the Stipulation and Joint mot req. vacation of order of reference. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/31/1996)

6235 Order (HL) Civ. Case 94−2384 is consolidated w/Civ. 79−4. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6236 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP Account in the amt of $52,947.39, by gov't defendants. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6237 FOURTEENTH−Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop in the amt of $14,890.40 covering the period of 4/29 − 5/17/96 in Ponce and from 4/29−5/24/96 at Las Malvinas. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6238 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $873.84 for atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6239 MOTION in compliance w/Court order dtd 5/23/96, by Atty Harry Anduze. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6240 ORDER The Clerk of the Court shall continue to make advances of $12,000. to the HCST on a trimestral basis, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (cm). (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6241

ORDER The SAC cease activity related to the establishment and operation of a chaplaincy program at AOC institutions. The fine funds remaining from the $200,000. originally authorized for the development of this program shall no longer be available to cover the costs of this program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6242 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $873.84 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6218: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6220: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 585941 in the amt of $14,130.68 payable to Carlos Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 585940 in the amt of $4,523.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6243 APPLICATION for Atty fees in the amt of $23,715.04 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6244 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $6,479.63 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6245 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,218.75 payable to atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

6246 Informative Motion by Atty Desiree LaBorde re: atty vacation schedule. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #585939 in the amt of $24,036. payable to Metropolitan University. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)

6251 Minute entry: Hrg on class representation set for 6/12/96 at 9:00AM. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)

6247 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee to use Fine Funds for a Hepatitis B Inmate Inoculation Program. (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 228 of 513

06/06/1996 06/06/1996 06/06/1996 06/06/1996 06/06/1996 06/06/1996 06/07/1996 06/07/1996 06/10/1996 06/10/1996 06/10/1996 06/10/1996 06/10/1996 06/10/1996 06/10/1996 06/12/1996 06/13/1996 06/13/1996 06/14/1996 06/14/1996

6248 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $968.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of April, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
6249 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,479.63 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
6250 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $23,715.04 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of May, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6208: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6209: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/06/1996)
Docket # 6252 was inadvertently skipped. (il) (Entered: 08/07/1996)
6253 Application for atty fees in the amt of $705. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
6254 SUBMISSION OF Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for Morales Feliciano Account, by Vila del Corral. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6239: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6236: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591055 in the amt of $6,479.63 payable to Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591052 in the amt of $23,715.04 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591054 in the amt of $873.84 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591051 in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591053 in the amt of $968.75 payable to Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
6255 Minute entry: Hrg on class representation held. Pltfs will file a proposal for the new representation of its class. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
6256 ORDER Motion for an order that pltfs counsel atty fees and expenses be paid from fine funds is granted, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
6257 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $14,890.40 payable to the Institute for the Technical & Occupational Careers, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
6258 ORDER authorizing the use of funds for a hepatitis B Inmate inoculation program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/14/1996)
6259 MOTION for approval of the Joint Compliance Consultant's Monthly Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses by pts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 229 of 513

06/14/1996 06/17/1996
06/17/1996
06/18/1996
06/18/1996
06/19/1996 06/19/1996 06/20/1996 06/20/1996
06/20/1996
06/20/1996 06/21/1996 06/21/1996 06/21/1996
06/21/1996 06/25/1996 06/25/1996 06/26/1996 06/26/1996 06/26/1996 06/26/1996

6260 JOINT mot req Allocation of Fine Funds in order to pay for AOC Owner's Representative by pts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1996)
6261 MOTION in compliance w/paragraph 56 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1996)
6262 INFORMATIVE mot that the report detailing current balance of Accounts for the months of April and May, 1996, were sent to pts., by defts. (il) (Entered: 06/19/1996)
6263 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $705. payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of May, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591184 in the amt of $14,890.40 payable to Institute for the Technical and Occupational Carrer, Inc. (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
6264 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's May Invoice in the amt of $78,722.48 , by A. Ravelo Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
6265 EIGHTY−SEVEN Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6262: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
6266 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amount of $90,608.95 from the fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
6267 ORDER The Clerk of the Court will transfer the amt of $68,749.83 from the fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6261: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6214: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6254: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
6268 COPY of Executive Order from the Governor authorizing that $2,000,000. be withdrawn from the Budget to pay expenses related to the Health Plan Program (Spanish). (il) (Entered: 06/21/1996)
6269 PROGRESS Report by Defendant−All re: State Penitentiary complex. (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #6264: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #6265: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #6269. Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
6270 SUBMISSION OF accounting of expenditures of fine monies for March 1996 by Court Monitor. (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591330 in the amt of $705 payable to Nora L. Rodriguez Matias, Esq. (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591331 in the amt of $68,749.83 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 230 of 513

06/26/1996
06/27/1996 06/28/1996 07/02/1996 07/02/1996 07/02/1996 07/03/1996 07/03/1996 07/03/1996 07/05/1996 07/05/1996 07/09/1996 07/09/1996 07/09/1996 07/10/1996 07/10/1996 07/10/1996
07/11/1996 07/11/1996

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #6260: Granted. The JCC shall proceed according to paragraph 9 of this mot and shall advise the Court how are the funds to pay for Owner's representative to be made available to him ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
6271 ORDER amending nunc pro tunc order #6266: the correct amt of money to be transf is $90,608.95 and not $90,068.95 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
6274 MOTION by Defendant−All to Extend Time until 8/31/96 to file the Correctional Health Program's Narrative Rpt and statistical information (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
6272 REPORT on the use of fine funds by The Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of Apr, May, and June 1996. (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
6273 ORDER for the payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,875 for services rendered in April 1996 relating to the accounting month of March 1996 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/02/1996)
6275 SUBMISSION of acct of expenditures of fine monies for March 1996 by Court Monitor. (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
6276 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of June 1996 of Bruce J. McGiverin in the amt of $1,722.15 (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591481 in the amt of $90,608.95 payable to Center for teh Study of Law and Inst. Litigation. (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591482 in the amt of $1,875 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
6277 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of June 1996 of atty Nora L. Rodriguez in the amt of $1,267.50 (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
6278 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Attorney Fees for the month of June 1996 of atty Harry Anduze in the amt of $745.38 (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
6279 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625 for the month of May 1996 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
6280 SUBMISSION of the joint compliance consultant in response to court's order of 6/26/96 by V. Nathan. (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6270: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
6281 15TH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Institute for the Technical & Occupational carrers, pursuant to the court's order of 12/19/94 and 2/6/95 (np) (Entered: 07/11/1996)
6282 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check from the fine fund mentioned above in the amt of $745.38 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of June, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
6283 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for expenses during the months of July, Aug and September, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (cm). (Entered: 07/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6274: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
6284 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $20,142.78 payable to atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of June, 1996. (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 231 of 513

07/11/1996 07/11/1996 07/15/1996 07/15/1996 07/15/1996 07/17/1996 07/17/1996 07/17/1996 07/18/1996 07/18/1996 07/18/1996 07/18/1996 07/18/1996 07/19/1996 07/19/1996 07/19/1996 07/19/1996 07/22/1996 07/23/1996 07/23/1996

6285 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $20,142.78 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of June, 1996.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
6286 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,722.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of June, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
6287 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,267.50 payable to Atty Nora L. Rodriguez for expenses during the month of June, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
6288 MOTION submitting Update to the Rosser International Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program by defts. (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
6289 MOTION submitting Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans by defts. (il) (Entered: 07/16/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 591683 in the amt of $20,142.78 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of June, 1996. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 591682 in the amt of $1,722.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of June, 1996. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591678 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6289: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6288: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6290 JOINT mot req an ext to the appointment of Dr. Aida Guzman as Chief Health Care Coordinator and that such appointment be financed through the use of find funds, by pts. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6291 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6292 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $781.25 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of June, 1996. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6293 MOTION of Marcelle D. Martell for admission PHV as co−counsel for defts. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6294 ITEMIZED statement of joint compliance Consultant's Time and Expenses by Vincent M. Nathan for the period of June, 1996. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6295 MOTION for the approval of the joint compliance consultant's monthly itemized statement of fees and expenses for the month of June, 1996 by pts. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6296 ORDER Approving the Fifteenth Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop . The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,966.80. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1996)
6297 MOTION submitting payment for EPB account in the amt of $131,603.69 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/24/1996)
6298 ORDER Banco Central Hispano is to disburse a check payable to Paine Webber Inc in the amt of $10,268,278.96 drawn on Acct. 501−00001−7 for investment in US Securities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/24/1996)
6299 ORDER for investment transaction with Paine Webber Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/24/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 232 of 513

07/24/1996 07/24/1996 07/24/1996 07/24/1996 07/24/1996 07/26/1996
07/26/1996 07/26/1996 07/26/1996
07/26/1996 07/26/1996 07/26/1996
07/29/1996 07/30/1996 08/01/1996
08/01/1996
08/02/1996
08/02/1996 08/05/1996 08/05/1996
08/05/1996

6300 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $843.75 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 07/26/1996)
6301 EIGHTY−NINE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 07/26/1996)
6302 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's June, 1996 Invoice, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 07/26/1996)
6303 CORRECTIONS Compliance Coordinator's Final Report to the Court by Otto J. Riefkohl. (il) (Entered: 07/26/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 591814 in the amt of $10,268,278.96 payable to Paine Webber Inc. of P.R. (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #591852 in the amt of 7,966.80 payable to Institute for the Technical and Occupational Career Inc. (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
6304 JOINT mot for disbursement of fine monies to joint compliance consultant to defray costs of Hepatitis B inmate Inoculation Program by pts. (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6293: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
6305 ORDER The Clerk will transfer the amt of $128,567.49 from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6291: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6290: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
6306 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check from the fine fund mentioned above in the amt of $781.25 payable to Atty Jeffrey Williams for expenses during the month of June, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6297: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1996)
6307 SUBMISSION of Final Accounting purs to Court order dtd 5/31/96 by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 08/02/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593023 in the amt of $781.25 payable to Atty Jeffrey M. Williams for expenses during the month of June, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/06/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593022 in the amt of $128,567.49 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 08/06/1996)
6308 SIXTEENTH Report for the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Institute for the Technical & Occupational Careers in the amt of $8,568. covering the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/06/1996)
6312 MOTION req. leave to withdraw as legal representative by Desiree Laborde. (il) (Entered: 08/06/1996)
6309 CORRECTION of submission of Accounting Expenditures of fine monies for April and May, 1996 by V. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 08/06/1996)
6310 MOTION for approval of the Joint Compliance Consultant's monthly itemized statement of fees and expenses in the amt of $113,365.98 for the month of July, 1996, by pts. (il) (Entered: 08/06/1996)
6311 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $587.70 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/06/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 233 of 513

08/06/1996 08/06/1996 08/06/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996 08/07/1996
08/07/1996
08/07/1996
08/07/1996
08/07/1996
08/08/1996 08/08/1996
08/12/1996
08/12/1996

6313 MOTION for disbursement of expert fees to Steven Martin in the amt of $8,968.41 covering the period from April, 1996 thru July 31, l996. (il) (Entered: 08/07/1996)
6314 APPLICATION for atty fees for Atty Carlos Garcia in the amt of $21,891.20 for the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/07/1996)
6315 APPLICATION for atty fees for Atty Luis M. Villaronga in the amt of $4,945.49 for the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/07/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6301: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6302: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6308: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6309: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6303: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6304: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6307: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6310: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6312: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
6316 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $843.75 payable to Atty Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of April, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
6317 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the sum of $730,516.12 to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
6318 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $113,365.98 from the fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
6319 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $21,891.20 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of July, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
6320 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $587.70 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of July, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6313: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/09/1996)
6321 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $4,945.49 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of July, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/09/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593197 in the amt of $843.75 payable to Rachel Brill for expenses during the month of April, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/14/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593196 in the amt of $21,891.20 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of July, 1996.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 234 of 513

08/12/1996
08/12/1996 08/12/1996 08/12/1996 08/12/1996 08/13/1996 08/14/1996
08/14/1996 08/14/1996 08/15/1996 08/15/1996 08/16/1996 08/19/1996 08/19/1996 08/19/1996 08/19/1996 08/19/1996 08/19/1996

(il) (Entered: 08/14/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593193 in the amt of $730,516.12 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593194 in the amt of $113,365.98 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 08/14/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593195 in the amt of $587.70 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/14/1996)

6322 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee to Use Fine Funds for a Drug Rehabilitation Pilot Program at Zarzal Correctional Institution and Camp Zarzal. (il) (Entered: 08/14/1996)

6323 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of 1,723.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/14/1996)

6324 ORDER Approving disbursement of fine funds to joint compliance consultant to defray costs of hepatitis B Inoculation Program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/14/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593219 in the amt of $4,945.49 payable to Atty Luis Villaronga for expenses during the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/15/1996)

6325 ORDER Approving recommendation of Special Advisory Committee for funding of Drug Rehabilitation Program and directing the Clerk of the Court to transfer the sum of $163,844. from the monies to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/15/1996)

6326 NINETY Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 08/15/1996)

6327 Expedited Bail Project's July Invoice in the amt of $64,062.76, by A. Ravelo Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 08/15/1996)

6328 INFORMATIVE mot detailing the current balance of the Accounts required under paragraphs 22 and 23, by defts. (il) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

6329 MOTION in Compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 08/16/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593287 in the amt of $163,844. payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 08/23/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6326: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6327: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6328: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6329: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

6330 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,723.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of July, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1996)

6331

ORDER After due consideration, the Court has determined that its Aug.6th Order should stand and the Court's Aug. 6, 1996 endorsed order of the Joint Mot for Disbursement of Fine Monies to Joint Compliance Consultant to Defray Costs of Hepatitis B Inmate Inoculation Program and its Aug. 12th order Approving Disbursement of Fine Funds to Joint Compliance Consultant to Defray Costs of

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 235 of 513

08/21/1996
08/22/1996
08/22/1996 08/26/1996 08/26/1996 09/04/1996 09/04/1996
09/04/1996 09/04/1996 09/04/1996 09/04/1996 09/05/1996 09/06/1996 09/06/1996 09/06/1996
09/06/1996
09/06/1996
09/06/1996
09/06/1996
09/06/1996

Hepatitis B Inoculation Program are hereby VACATED. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593372 in the amt of $1,723.15 payable to Atty Bruce McGiverin for expenses during the month of July, 1996. (il) (Entered: 08/27/1996)
6332 MOTION submitting Food Service Audits and Corrective Action Plans purs to March 30, 1990 order and req for leave to file them in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 08/23/1996)
6333 MOTION submitting Progress Report for the State Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file the Report in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 08/23/1996)
6334 MOTION submittingi FRP Quarterly Report covering the period from April 1st thru June 30, 1996 by Director Juseff M. Galib. (il) (Entered: 08/27/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6334: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6335 MOTION BY Joseph Maya Gambino (in Spanish) req. protective order (Civ. 95−2181) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6336 SEVENTEENTH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Careers in the amt of $5,104.41 for the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6337 APPLICATION for atty fees for atty Luis M. Villaronga in the amt of $7,610.24 for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6338 APPLICATION for atty fees for atty Bruce J. McGiverin in the amt of $3,006.90 for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6339 APPLICATION for atty fees for atty Carlos V. Garcia in the amt of $22,793.88 for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6340 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6341 APPLICATION for atty fees for atty Harry Anduze in the amt of $588.45 for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6333: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6332: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6342 ORDER Approving the Sixteenth Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop in the amt of $8,568. for the month of July, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6343 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay Atty Luis M. Villaronga the sum of $3,218.75 for fees during the month of May, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6344 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $7,610.24 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of August, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6345 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,793.88 payable to atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of August, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6346 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,006.90 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of August, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/06/1996)
6347 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $588.45 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 236 of 513

09/09/1996 09/09/1996 09/09/1996 09/09/1996 09/09/1996 09/09/1996 09/16/1996 09/16/1996 09/16/1996 09/17/1996 09/18/1996 09/18/1996 09/19/1996 09/19/1996 09/19/1996 09/19/1996 09/19/1996 09/19/1996 09/20/1996

Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/09/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593721 in the amt of $22,793.88 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593722 in the amt of $3,006.90 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593720 in the amt of $7,610.24 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593718 in the amt of $3,218.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of May, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593719 in the amt of $8,568.00 payable to the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Career (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6348 Minute entry: S/C is set for 9/16/96 at 5:15PM. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593777 in the amt of $588.45 payabe to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6349 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $5,104.41 to the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Careers covering the month of August, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6350 JOINT mot req allocation of Fine Funds in order to pay for services to be rendered by STV during the design and construction phases of various Correctional Facilities by pts. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6351 MOTION for the Approval of the Joint Compliance Consultant's monthly Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses in the amt of $126,725.05 for the month of August, 1996 by pts. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6352 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's August, 1996 Invoice in the amt of $57,606.02, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6353 NINETY−ONE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6340: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6354 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral and Company in the amt of $1,625. invoice 6290 coverin the month of June, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6355 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral and Company in the amt of $1,625. invoice 6455 for the month of July, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6356 ORDER directing filing of Reports concerning Employment of Correctional Health Staff. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/19/1996)
6357 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP Account in the amt of $58,767.16 ck# 01510775 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593852 in the amt of $5,104.41 payable to the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Careers. (il) (Entered: 09/30/1996)
6358 INFORMATIVE mot reegarding FRP stipulation by pts. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 237 of 513

09/20/1996 09/20/1996 09/20/1996 09/20/1996 09/25/1996
09/26/1996 09/27/1996 09/27/1996 09/27/1996 09/30/1996 10/01/1996 10/02/1996 10/02/1996 10/04/1996 10/04/1996 10/04/1996 10/07/1996 10/07/1996 10/07/1996

6359 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6353: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/25/1996)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6352: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/25/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0593874 and 0593873 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral & Co. for accounting management during the months of May and June, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/26/1996)

6360

ORDER the Court approves the Joint Compliance Consultant's itemized monthly statement for ther period of August 1 thru August 31, 1996. The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $126,725.05 from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/26/1996)

6361 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering the months of July, August and September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 09/30/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0593852 in the amt of $5,104.41 payable to Institute for the Technical and Occupational Careers. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1996)

6366 ORDER The complaint in Civ. 96−1038 is ordered dismissed with prejudice, having failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/08/1996)

6367 JUDGMENT in Civ. 96−1038 dismissing the case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/08/1996)

6362 MOTION SUBMITTING Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req for leave to file them in Spanish, by defts. w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1996)

6363 ORDER Consolidating Civ. 96−2180 with this case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/04/1996)

6364 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of 341.70 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1996)

BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0597088 in the amt of $126,725.05 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 10/04/1996)

6365 Informative Motion by defts re: CHP's First Bimonthly Staffing Report. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1996)

APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $19,350.72 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1996)

APPLICATION for attys fees in the amt of $2,031.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/07/1996)

6368 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,031.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for atty expenses during the month of September, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/08/1996)

6369 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $19,350.72 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of September, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/08/1996)

6370 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $2,928.30 payable to atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/08/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 238 of 513

10/08/1996 10/08/1996 10/08/1996 10/08/1996 10/09/1996 10/09/1996 10/09/1996 10/09/1996 10/09/1996 10/09/1996 10/09/1996 10/09/1996 10/10/1996 10/10/1996 10/10/1996 10/11/1996 10/15/1996 10/16/1996 10/16/1996 10/16/1996

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6362 : Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/08/1996)
6371 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $341.70 payable to atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/08/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6361: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/10/1996)
6372 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,928.30 to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of September, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/10/1996)
6373 Designation of Atty Jose E. Fernandez as Aternate Lead Counsel during Oct. 9th thru Oct. 15, 1996, by Atty Carlos Garcia. (il) (Entered: 10/10/1996)
6374 ORDER Directing notice to all prisoners within the jurisdiction of the Administration of Corrections. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/10/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6359: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/10/1996)
6375 Informative Motion by defts re: Semi−Annual Statistical Report w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/10/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0597270 in the amt of $2,031.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0597269 in the amt of $19,350.72 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK #0597269 in the amt of $19,350.72 payable to Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0597270 in the amt of $2,031.25 payble to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6365: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/11/1996)
6376 EIGHTEENTH Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Careers covering the period from Sept 3 thru Sept. 30, l996 in the amt of $3,085.60 (il) (Entered: 10/11/1996)
BANCO CENTRAL HISPANO MANAGER'S CHECK # 0597271 in the amt of $341.70 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)
6377 SUBMISSION of Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for the Morales Feliciano Account by Court Monitor. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)
6378 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish by defts. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)
6379 MOTION submitting Progress Report for the State Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file the Report in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6373: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6375: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/17/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 239 of 513

10/16/1996 10/17/1996 10/17/1996
10/17/1996 10/17/1996 10/17/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/21/1996 10/29/1996 10/30/1996 10/31/1996
11/04/1996 11/04/1996

BANCO SANTANDER CK # 1590263 in the amt of $2,928.30 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
6380 ORDER Approving joint mot req Allocation of Fine Funds to pay for services to be rendered by STV during the design and construction of various correctional facilities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/18/1996)
6381 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for expenses during the months of October, November and December, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/18/1996)
6382 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans, by defts. (il) (Entered: 10/18/1996)
6383 Informative Motion re: Expedited Bail Project's September, 1996 Invoice. (il) (Entered: 10/18/1996)
6384 MOTION SUBMITTING Ninety−Two Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 10/18/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER CK# 1590350 in the amt of $500,000. payable to the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER CK# 1590349 in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for expenses covering the months of October, November and December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6379: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6378: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6384: Noted. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6383: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6377: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6382: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
6385 MOTION for ext of time to distribute PLRA Notices to all inmates within the jurisdiction of the Administration of Correction, by defts. (il) (Entered: 10/24/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6385: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/30/1996)
6386 MOTION for approval of the Joint Compliance Consultant's Monthly Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses in the amt of $117,697.46 covering the month of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/01/1996)
6387 RECOMMENDATION of the Special Advisory Committee and the Joint Compliance Consultant to extend funding for the Sistema de Educacion Universitaria Externa Program at the Administration of Correction Penal Institutions. (il) (Entered: 11/01/1996)
6388 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $6,362.25 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1996)
6389 MOTION to req that the Court approve the Steps taken by Lead Counsel in setting up the Civil Action and Education Corporation and req funding for the Operational of the Corp. by pltf. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 240 of 513

11/06/1996 11/06/1996 11/06/1996 11/07/1996 11/07/1996 11/08/1996 11/08/1996 11/08/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/12/1996 11/13/1996 11/14/1996

6390 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the FRP Stipulation, by defts. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1996)
6391 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $397. payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1996)
6392 INFORMATIVE mot regarding change of address of DOJ, by defts. (il) (Entered: 11/07/1996)
6393 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $397. payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of October, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/08/1996)
6394 MOTION to withdraw of legal representation by Jeffrey Williams (il) (Entered: 11/08/1996)
6395 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral & Company for invoice covering the accounting of August, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6387: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
6396 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $117,697.46 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
6397 NINETEETH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Institute for the Technical & Occupational Careers in the amt of $17,631.60 covering the period of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
6398 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,641.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
6399 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $15,559.85 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
6400 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $6,362.25 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
6401 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $15, 559.85 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of October, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
6402 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,641.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of October, 1996.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6392: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6390: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/13/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1590829 in the amt of $397. payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1590830 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral for accounting during the month of August, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6403 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral for accounting expenses during the month of August, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6404 ORDER Approving the use of fine funds for the Sistema de Educacion Universitaria Externa (SEDUE) Program for the 1996−1997 Academic Year. ( signed by Judge

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 241 of 513

11/14/1996
11/14/1996
11/14/1996
11/14/1996
11/14/1996 11/15/1996
11/20/1996
11/20/1996 11/20/1996 11/21/1996 11/21/1996 11/25/1996 11/25/1996 11/25/1996 11/25/1996 11/27/1996 12/03/1996 12/03/1996 12/03/1996
12/04/1996

Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1590881 in the amt of $15,559.85 payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1590882 in the amt of $6,362.55 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1590880 in the amt of $1,641.25 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1590883 in the amt of $117,697.46 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1590891 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6405 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6406 ORDER The Court wishes to meet with lead counsel for both pts. A S/C is set for 11/25/96 at 5:30PM. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6407 MOTION submitting update to the Rosser International Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program, by defts. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6408 MOTION submitting payment for the EBP Account in the amt of $64,062.76 (July) and $57,606.02 (August), by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6409 NINETY−THREE FINANCIAL REPORT of the Expedited Bail Project by Angelo Ravelo Garcia, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
6410 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S invoice for the month of October, 1996 in the amt of $74,424.14, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 11/22/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6410: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/25/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6407: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/25/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6409: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/25/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6405: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/25/1996)
6411 JOINT mot req an ext of time to file a written joint report regarding the prison conditions at the Campamento Penal Punta Lima, by pts. (il) (Entered: 12/04/1996)
6412 APPLICATION for Attorney Fees by Atty Luis Villaronga in the amt of $3,687.50 for the month of November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/04/1996)
6413 APPLICATION for Attorney Fees by Atty Carlos V. Garcia for the amt of $20,336.9l for the month of November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/04/1996)
6414 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice #6703 in the amt of $2,625. to Vila de Corral & Co. covering the period of September and October, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/04/1996)
6415 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,687.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of November, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/05/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 242 of 513

12/04/1996 12/04/1996 12/04/1996 12/04/1996 12/04/1996 12/05/1996 12/05/1996 12/06/1996 12/06/1996 12/06/1996 12/06/1996 12/06/1996 12/06/1996 12/09/1996 12/09/1996 12/09/1996 12/10/1996 12/10/1996 12/10/1996 12/12/1996

6416 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $20,336.91 to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of November, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/05/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1627352 in the amt of $2,625. payable to Vila del Corral Co. − Accounting services for the months of Sept and Oct., 1996 (il) (Entered: 12/05/1996)
6417 MOTION for approval of the Joint Compliance Consultant's monthly Itemized statement of fees and expenses by pts. (il) (Entered: 12/05/1996)
6418 INFORMATIVE mot submitting the Correctional Health Program Second Bimonthly Staffing Report, by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/05/1996)
6419 MOTION submitting Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans purs to March 30, 1990 order and req for leave to file them in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/05/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6411: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/06/1996)
6420 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $459.40 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/06/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1627398 in the amt of $3,687.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/09/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1627397 in the amt of $20,336.91 payable to Atty Carlos Garcia for expenses during the month of November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/09/1996)
6421 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $459.40 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6419: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6418: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/09/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6417: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/09/1996)
Civ. Cases 91−1184 and 91−1185 were consolidated with this case on 2/12/91. (il) (Entered: 12/09/1996)
6422 Designation of Alternate Lead Counsel − Atty Fernandez Sein from 12/10 thru 12/13/96 by Atty Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 12/10/1996)
6423 MOTION submitting Deposit for the Special Fund in the amt of $166,748.12 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 12/10/1996)
6424 AMENDED EIGHTEENTH REPORT of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop in the amt of $3,085.60 covering the period of September, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1996)
6425 ADDITIONAL information regarding the 18th and 19th Report of the Garment Manufacturing Workshop covering the period from October − November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1627443 in the amt of $459.40 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6422: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/16/1996)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 243 of 513

12/12/1996 12/13/1996
12/16/1996
12/16/1996
12/17/1996
12/18/1996 12/18/1996
12/19/1996 12/19/1996 12/20/1996 12/20/1996
12/26/1996 12/26/1996 12/26/1996
12/30/1996 12/31/1996 01/02/1997 01/02/1997 01/03/1997 01/07/1997 01/07/1997

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6423: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/16/1996)
6426 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $10,884.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1996)
6427 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $10,884.15 for Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of November,l996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/17/1996)
6428 MOTION in Compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/17/1996)
6429 MOTION for disbursement of Expert Fees to Steve J. Martin in the amt of $8,906.89 covering the period from August 1st thru December 4, 1996, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 12/19/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6428: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/19/1996)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624508 in the amt of $10,884.15 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of November, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/02/1997)
6430 NINETY−FOUR Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 12/20/1996)
6431 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S NOVEMBER, 1996 INVOICE. (il) (Entered: 12/20/1996)
ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #6429. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (su) (Entered: 12/23/1996)
6444 MOTION SUBMITTING PROGRESS REPORT for the STATE Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file the report in Spanish w/attachment by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
6432 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing, by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/02/1997)
6433 SUBMISSION of Accounting for Fine Funds held by the Joint Compliance Consultant, Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 01/02/1997)
6434 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of October, November and December, 1996 (il) (Entered: 01/02/1997)
6435 MOTION submitting payment for EBP Account in the amt of $51,974.25, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 01/02/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6431: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/02/1997)
6436 MOTION designating Manuel A. Quilichini as lead counsel in case for defts. (il) (Entered: 01/03/1997)
6437 MOTION req leave to withdraw as lead counsel for defts by Atty. Jose A. Fuentes Agostini. (il) (Entered: 01/03/1997)
6438 OPPOSITION to mot for leave to withdraw by the Firm of Totti and Rodriguez Diaz, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1997)
6439 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $302.94 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1997)
6440 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,093.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 244 of 513

01/08/1997 01/08/1997
01/08/1997 01/09/1997
01/10/1997 01/10/1997 01/10/1997 01/10/1997 01/10/1997
01/10/1997 01/10/1997 01/10/1997 01/10/1997
01/10/1997 01/10/1997 01/14/1997 01/14/1997 01/14/1997
01/15/1997 01/15/1997

01/09/1997)
6441 MOTION for advancement of funds for the Civil Action and Education Corporation in the amt of $250,000. by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1997)
6442 INFORMATIVE mot advising that written report detailing the current balance of the Accounts required under Paragraphs 22 and 23 were sent to pts, by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1997)
6443 MOTION for approval of joint compliance Consultant's monthly itemized statement of fees and expenses in the amt of $203,569.34 by pts. (il) (Entered: 01/09/1997)
6445 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $302.94 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6433: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
6446 MOTION SUBMITTING payment for the EBP Account in the amt of $74,424.14 ck# 01552277 w/attachment, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
6447 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,000.for Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
6448 INFORMATIVE mot re atty Carlos V. Garcia change of address, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6437: Atty Fuentes Agostini is allowed to withdraw as counsel for the gov't defts in his capacity as an attorney in the private practice of law. The mot is denied as to the law firm of Totti, Rodriguez, Diaz and Fuentes. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6436: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6432: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6434: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
6449 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to transfer the amt of $203,569.34 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6442: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6438: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/14/1997)
6450 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $14,895.6l for Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
6451 Designation of Alternate Lead Counsel Jose E. Fernandez from Jan. 17 thru Jan. 26, 1997, by Carlos V. Garcia. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
6452 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,093.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of December, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624537 in the amt of $250,000. payable to Civil Action and Education Corp. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624536 in the amt of $203,569.34 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 245 of 513

01/15/1997 01/15/1997 01/15/1997 01/16/1997 01/16/1997 01/16/1997 01/16/1997 01/17/1997 01/17/1997 01/21/1997 01/23/1997 01/23/1997 01/23/1997 01/23/1997 01/24/1997 01/24/1997 01/24/1997 01/24/1997 01/27/1997

6453 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $14,895.6l payable to Atty Carlos V. Garcia for expenses during the month of December, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
6454 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $250,000. payable to the Civil Action and Education Corporation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624535 in the amt of $302.94 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
6455 MOTION to employ Christopher A. Jenkins as Assistant to Lead Counsel and President of the Civil Action and Education Corporation, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6448: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6446: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6444: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/17/1997)
6456 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
6457 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,000. for expenses during the month of December, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624540 in the amt of $14,895.61 payable to Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
6458 NOTICE of change of address for the Joint Compliance Consultant, by Vincent Nathan. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624543 in the amt of $105,866.86 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
6459 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624544 in the amt of $3,000. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624545 in the amt of $48,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6451: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6455: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
6460 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Santisima Trinidad for expenses during the months of January, February and March, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/27/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624546 in the amt of $12,000. payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the months of Oct, Nov and December, 1996. This check substitutes ck# 1624545 for $48,000. issued 1−24−97. Previous order is vacated. (il) (Entered: 01/28/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 246 of 513

01/28/1997 01/28/1997 01/28/1997 01/28/1997
01/28/1997 01/28/1997 01/29/1997
01/31/1997 01/31/1997 01/31/1997 01/31/1997 01/31/1997 02/03/1997 02/03/1997 02/04/1997 02/04/1997 02/05/1997 02/07/1997 02/07/1997

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6456: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6461 NINETY−FIVE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6462 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S December, 1996 invoice, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6463

AMENDED ORDER According to the mot req fees filed by Atty Villaronga, he did not incur in any expenses during the month of December, 1996. The order enterd by this Court (dkt#6452) erroneously awarded Atty Villaronga an additional amt of $820.49 for expenses incurred during said month. The Clerk of the Court advance Atty Villaronga the sum of $3,093.75 only for fees earned during the month of December, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6459: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6464 ITEMIZED Statement of Joint Compliance Consultant's Time and Expenses for the month of December, 1996, by Vincent Nathan. (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6465 ORDER Regarding the Special Advisory Committee. The Court accepts the resignation of Eliezer Curet Cuevas and appoints Jose Lazaro Paoli to serve as Chairman of The Special Advisory Committee. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6466 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral & Company for invoice #6897 in relation to accounting month of November, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6467 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral and Co. for the accounting month of October, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/31/1997)

6468 INFORMATIVE mot regarding compliance w/Paragraph 24 of the FRP Stipulation for the month of December, 1996, by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/05/1997)

6469 MOTION to req an ext of time to file Report on Punta Lima by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 02/05/1997)

6470 OPINION AND ORDER Listing various issues which have not been covered at previous meetings and an in−chambers meeting on 2/13/97 at 10:00AM. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 02/05/1997)

6471 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/05/1997)

BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624550 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral and Co. for accounting month of October, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/05/1997)

6472 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $646.78 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, 1997. (il) (Entered: 02/05/1997)

6473 Informative Motion by defts re: CHP's Third Bimonthly Staffing Report w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 02/05/1997)

6474 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $646.78 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/07/1997)

6475 MOTION submitting Payment for the EBP Account in the amt of $60,306.90 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

6476 MOTION to withdraw as counsel for gov't defts by Atty Marshal D. Morgan. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 247 of 513

02/07/1997 02/07/1997 02/11/1997 02/11/1997 02/11/1997 02/12/1997 02/12/1997 02/12/1997 02/13/1997 02/13/1997 02/13/1997
02/14/1997 02/18/1997 02/18/1997 02/19/1997 02/19/1997 02/19/1997 02/19/1997 02/19/1997 02/19/1997

6477 AMENDED mot in compliance w/Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

6478 INFORMATIVE mot submitting a corrected third bi−monthly staffing report by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

6479 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $2,437.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of January, 1997. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624565 in the amt of $3,093.75 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for atty fees during the month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

6482 MOTION req leave to withdraw as legal representative for defts, by Atty Ivan Vega Lassalle (DOJ). (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6469: Granted until 3/14/97. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624570 in the amt of $646.78 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of January, 1997. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1997)

6480 ORDER The Clerk will be ordered to transfer the amt of $169,154.01 from fine funds under the Court to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)

6480 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $3,280. for atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of January, 1997. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1997)

6481 EVALUATION of the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Careers Garment−Manufacturing Workshop at the Ponce Women and Young Adults Institution by V. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 02/14/1997)

6483

Minute entry: Meeting held in chambers. Mr. Fuentes Agostini informed the Court that the new lead attorney for the defts is Manuel Quilichini. All pending issues are discussed. Next meeting is set for 2/28/97 at 5:00PM. The new Adminstrator of Corrections is to be present. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

6484 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,280. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of January, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

6485 INFORMATIVE mot detailing the current balance of the Account for the month of January, by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

6486 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6478: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6477: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6475: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6481: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6476: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

6487 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,437.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of January, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 248 of 513

02/19/1997 02/20/1997 02/21/1997 02/21/1997 02/21/1997 02/24/1997 02/24/1997 02/24/1997 02/24/1997 02/25/1997 02/25/1997 02/25/1997 02/25/1997 02/27/1997 02/27/1997 02/28/1997
03/03/1997 03/03/1997 03/03/1997 03/03/1997

6488 ORDER issuing final payment for the Garment Manufacturing Workshop conducted by the Fashion Merchandising and Technical Institute in the amt of $5,291.20 . ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/20/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624585 in the amt of $3,280. payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of January, 1997. (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
6489 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's January, 1997 invoice in the amt of $50,511.17 by Acting Director, Angelo Ravelo. (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
6490 NINETY−SIX FINANCIAL REPORT OF THE Expedited Bail Project (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6486: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6485: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624616 in the amt of $2,437.50 payable to Atty Luis M. Villaronga for expenses during the month of January, 1997. (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6482: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624617 in the amt of $5,291.20 payable to the Institute for the Technical & Occupational Careers. (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624620 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral & Co. for the accounting month of December, 1996. (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
6491 ORDER for the payment of custody fees to Banco Santander in the amt of $50. covering custody services for the period of Nov. 96 to Jan. 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
6492 ORDER for payment of custody fees to Banco Santander in the amt of $50. covering custody fees for the period of Feb. 1996 to January 31, 1997.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
6493 ORDER for payment to services to Vila del Corral and Co. in the amt of $1,625. for services provided in Jan, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/27/1997)
6494 MOTION for special appearance by Gonzalez Guanill w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
6495 ORDER re dkt#6494: Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
6496 Minute entry: Meeting held in chambers. The Court will issue an order suspending the Joint Compliance Consultant and appointing Mr. Nathan as court−appointed expert witness purs to Rule 706 of the Federal Rules of Evidence. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
6497 MOTION submitting Progress Report for the State Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file the report in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
6498 MOTION in compliance with Order regarding the Privatization of the Correctional Health Program, by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6490: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6489: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 249 of 513

03/03/1997 03/04/1997
03/05/1997 03/06/1997 03/10/1997 03/10/1997 03/10/1997 03/10/1997 03/10/1997 03/11/1997 03/11/1997 03/12/1997 03/12/1997 03/12/1997 03/12/1997 03/17/1997 03/17/1997 03/17/1997 03/19/1997 03/19/1997

6499 MOTION submitting Outline of Strategic Plan, by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
6500 ORDER To Show Cause why the Court should not suspend certain provisions of prior orders relating to the Employment of the Joint Compliance Consultant and Appoint Expert Witness Vincent M. Nathan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
6501 MOTION for Approval of the Joint Compliance Consultant's monthly Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses in the amt of $123,368.99, by pts. (il) (Entered: 03/06/1997)
6502 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $367.05 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1997. (il) (Entered: 03/10/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6497: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6499: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1997)
6503 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $367.05 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of February, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1997)
6504 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to transfer the amt of $123,368.99 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1997)
6505 ORDER Appointing Vincent M. Nathan to serve as expert witness. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624648 in the amt of $123,368.99 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624649 in the amt of $367.05 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of Feb. 1997. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1997)
6506 MOTION for disbursement of expert fees in the amt of $6,099.36 payable to Steve J. Martin covering the period from 12/1/96 thru February 28, 1997. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1997)
6507 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $2,895.80 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1997. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1997)
6508 MOTION for approval of the Joint Compliance Consultant's monthly Itemized Statement of Fees and Expenses in the amt of $81,589.08, by pts. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1997)
6509 ORDER Approving summary of order appointing Vincent M. Nathan to serve as expert witness. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/13/1997)
6510 MOTION to req setting of bi−weekly S/C, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1997)
6511 MOTION to modify the Court's order Appointing Vincent M. Nathan to serve as expert witness, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1997)
6512 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1997)
6513 NINETY−Seven Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1997)
6514 INFORMATIVE mot req Expedited Bail Project's February 1997 invoice in the amt of $56,266.71, by Angelo Ravelo. (il) (Entered: 03/20/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 250 of 513

03/21/1997 03/21/1997
03/21/1997 03/21/1997 03/21/1997 03/24/1997 03/24/1997 03/24/1997 03/24/1997 03/25/1997 03/25/1997 03/25/1997 03/27/1997 03/31/1997
04/01/1997 04/02/1997 04/03/1997 04/03/1997 04/03/1997

6515 ORDER Approving the itemized statement of time and expenses in the amt of $6,099.36 of Steve Martin covering the period of December 1, 1996 thru February 28, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6516 ORDER The Clerk will transfer the amt of $81,589.08 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation covering the period of February 1,1997 thru February 28, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6517 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $2,895.80 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6498: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6510: Granted. The Court will meet with counsel on March 24, 1997 at 5:30PM. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6514: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6513: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6512: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6511: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6518 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6519 AMENDED mot in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6520 INFORMATIVE mot req. the amended mot in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the stipulation, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6521 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of January, February and March, 1997. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6522 MOTION for immediate relief concerning the conditions of the medical area at Bayamon 308 and of conditions at the maximum security section at Bayamon 308 now being used to house inmates during admission procedures, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6523 MOTION submitting Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans and req to file them in Spanish, by defts (w/attachs.) (il) (Entered: 04/03/1997)
6524 MOTION for approval of a Budget for the Civil Action and Education Corporation and for disbursement of funds in the amt of $1,075,411. by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 04/04/1997)
6525 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to issue a check in the amt of $1,075,411. payable to the Civil Action and Education Corporation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/04/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK in the amt of $2,895.80 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of February, 1997. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624705 in the amt of $81,589.08 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 251 of 513

04/04/1997
04/04/1997 04/04/1997 04/04/1997
04/04/1997 04/07/1997 04/07/1997 04/07/1997 04/07/1997 04/07/1997 04/07/1997
04/07/1997
04/07/1997 04/08/1997 04/08/1997 04/10/1997
04/14/1997 04/15/1997
04/15/1997 04/15/1997
04/15/1997

6526 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $12,000. to the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for expenses during the months of April, May and June, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/04/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6521: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/04/1997)
6527 INFORMATIVE mot concerning inmates interviewed by the Court at Bayamon Regional Jail, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
6528 MOTION submitting Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans and req for leave to file them in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
6529 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $304.65 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1996. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6522: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6519: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6520: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6518: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6523: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
6530 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $304.65 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
6531 ORDER granting in part and denying in part pltfs mot to modify the Court's order appointing Vincent M. Nathan to serve as expert witness. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
6532 SUBMISSION OF Accountant's report concerning FRP Accounts, by pltf class (w/binder attached.) (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
6533 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $3,663.52 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, 1997. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624718 in the amt of $1,075,411. payable to Civil Action and Education Corp. (il) (Entered: 04/09/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624721 in the amt of $304.65 payable to Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of March, 1997. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6534 REPORT on Medical and Mental Health Care by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624703 in the amt of $6,099.36 payable to Steven Martin thru certified mail P227 289 936 for expenditures from Dec. 96 thru Feb. 1997. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6535 INFORMATIVE MOT that report detailing the current balance of the Accounts under Paragraphs 22 and 23 were sent to pts., by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6536 MOTION in Compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6537 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's fees and expenses for the month of March, 1997 (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 252 of 513

04/16/1997
04/17/1997
04/17/1997 04/17/1997 04/17/1997 04/17/1997
04/17/1997
04/17/1997 04/22/1997 04/22/1997 04/22/1997 04/23/1997
04/23/1997 04/23/1997 04/23/1997
04/28/1997 04/29/1997 05/02/1997 05/05/1997 05/07/1997 05/12/1997

6538 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $104,918.82 from fine funds under the courts control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6539 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,663.52 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6528: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6527: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6532: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6540 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral for invoice covering the period February, l997 in relation to accounting for the month of January, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6541 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral for invoice from March, 1997 covering the accounting of February, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6542 MOTION for ext of time to respond to Court order, by Edwin Llanne Ortiz (pro−se). (il) (Entered: 04/22/1997)
6543 INFORMATIVE mot regarding Paragraph 24 of FRP Stipulation by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624733 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral for invoice 71−58. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624732 in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila del Corral for invoice 71−08. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624744 in the amt of $104,918.82 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
6544 NINETY−eight Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by Angelo Ravelo Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
6545 INFORMATIVE MOT regarding Expedited Bail Project's March 1997 invoice, by Angelo Ravelo. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624743 in the amt of $3,663.52 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of March, l997. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
6546 INFORMATIVE mot req ext of time to amend complaint, by Edwin Llanes (pro−se in Civ. 95−2535) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
Letter from Angelo Ravelo req EBP's bimonthly payment in the amt of $130,000. for the months of May and June, 1997. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
6547 MOTION containing proposal for Transfer of Certain functions performed by the Court−Appointed Expert Witness, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1997)
6548 INFORMATIVE mot concerning inmates interviewed by the Court at Bayamon Regional Jail, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/09/1997)
6549 MOTION submitting update to the Rosser International Work Plan for the Facilities Rehabilitation Program, by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/09/1997)
6550 SEVENTH REPORT of the External Education University System. (il) (Entered: 05/14/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 253 of 513

05/13/1997
05/13/1997 05/13/1997 05/14/1997 05/14/1997
05/14/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997 05/15/1997
05/16/1997
05/19/1997
05/20/1997 05/23/1997 05/23/1997 05/23/1997

6551 JOINT Emergency mot for an order that the Chief Health Care Coordinator extend or renew Professional Contracts to maintain continuity of Services in the Correctional Health Program, by pltfs class. (il) (Entered: 05/14/1997)
6552 ITEMIZED statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Time and Expenses covering the period of April, 1997 (il) (Entered: 05/14/1997)
6553 APPLICATION for atty fees in the amt of $1,968.13 for atty Bruce M.McGiverin for the month of April, 1997. (il) (Entered: 05/14/1997)
6554 HOGAR CATOLICO SANTISIMA TRINIDAD − Narrativo y Presupuesto (il) (Entered: 05/14/1997)
6555 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req to file it in Spanish by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
6556 MOTION submitting Progress Report for the State Penitentiary Complex and req to file it in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6549: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6534: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6536: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6535: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6545: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6548: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6552: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6554: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6537: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
6557 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,968.13 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of April, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
6558 ORDER that the Chief Correctional Health Care Coordinator take all necessary contractual steps to maintain continuity of services to inmates in the custody of the Administration of Correction. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
6559 MOTION to submit Pltfs specific alternative to the Court's expert witness' recommendation that a Receiver be appointed to resolve the Correctional Health Program Crisis, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/21/1997)
6560 MOTION submitting duplicate payment to Steve Martin ck#1624703 in the amt of $6,099.36 dtd 4/3/97, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/23/1997)
6561 INFORMATIVE mot regarding Paragraph 24 of the FRP Stipulation, by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1997)
6562 MOTION submitting Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans by defts. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1997)
6563 INFORMATIVE mot regarding Expedited Bail Project's April, 1997 invoice, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 254 of 513

05/23/1997 05/28/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 05/30/1997 06/02/1997 06/05/1997 06/06/1997 06/10/1997 06/10/1997 06/12/1997
06/12/1997
06/12/1997 06/16/1997

6564 NINETY−NINE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624805 in the amt of $1,968.13 payable to Bruce J. McGiverin for atty fees during the month of April, 1997. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6564: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6561: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6562: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6563: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6550: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6560: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6555: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6556: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/30/1997)
6565 DEFTS mot req additional time to address pltfs alternative recommendation to the expert witness report on the Correctional Health Program. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/03/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624825 in the amt of $169,154.01 payable to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. (il) (Entered: 06/05/1997)
6566 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,164.00 to Universidad Metropolitana. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/05/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK # 1624830 in the amt of $22,164. payable to Universidad Metropolitana Sedue Program (il) (Entered: 06/10/1997)
6567 JOINT mot stating the Fiscal arrangements which shall be made to pay for the Professional Services contracted for by the Chief Health Care Coordinator, by pltf class. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/12/1997)
6568 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Time and Expenses covering the period of May, 1997. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/12/1997)
6569 ORDER The Clerk is to transfer the amt of $136,527.57 from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Litigation for the period of April, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/13/1997)
6570 ORDER The Clerk is to transfer the amt of $230,627.05 from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Litigation for the period of May, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/13/1997)
6571 MOTION for disbursement of expert fees to Steve J. Martin in the amt of $5,883.31 for the periof of March thru May, 1997.(il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/13/1997)
6572 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's change of address. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/18/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 255 of 513

06/16/1997 06/16/1997 06/17/1997 06/17/1997 06/17/1997
06/17/1997
06/17/1997 06/17/1997 06/19/1997 06/20/1997 06/20/1997 06/20/1997 06/21/1997
06/23/1997 06/24/1997 06/24/1997 06/25/1997 06/25/1997 06/26/1997

6573 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's May, 1997 invoice in the amt of $71,168.99 by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/18/1997)
6574 One−Hundred Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project for the month of May, 1997. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/18/1997)
6575 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/18/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6565: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/18/1997)
6576 ORDER The Chief Health Care Coordinator, Aida Guzman, is directed to contact Mr. Nathan no later than 6/30/97 to coordinate the subsequent transfer of the furnishings and equipment from the Court Monitor's office. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/18/1997)
6577 ORDER Approving the Itemized Statement of Time and Expenses in the amt of $5,883.31 covering the period from March 1, 1997 through May 26, 1997 of pltfs expert Steve J. Martin. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/18/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624864 in the amt of $136,527.57 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation (il) (Entered: 06/20/1997)
BANCO SANTANDER MANAGER'S CHECK #1624865 in the amt of $230,627.05 payable to Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation (il) (Entered: 06/20/1997)
6578 MOTION for ext of time to respond to plts interrogatories by defts. (il) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/20/1997)
6579 MOTION informing vacation of cnsl Roberto Lefranc from 7/23/97 to 8/3/97. (np) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/25/1997)
6580 INFORMATIVE mot by defts in re: detailed rpt of the accounts required under Paragraphs 22 and 23 and all activity for the month of May 1997, was sent to the pts, w/attchs. (np) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/25/1997)
6581 APPLICATION for atty fees for the Month of May 1997 by B. McGiverin in the amt of $1,280. (np) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/25/1997)
6633 Minute entry: Fourth day of hrg on the correctional health program. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 9:30AM. Exhbs. 594 through 600 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/25/1997)
6582 MOTION for ext of time until 8/31/97 to complete use of force training to correctional officers. (np) Modified on 06/30/1997 (Entered: 06/25/1997)
6583 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering the months of April, May and June, 1997 in the amt of $48,000. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6578: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)
6584 MOTION setting forth Defts position on pltfs alternative recommendation to the Expert Witness Report on the Correctional Health Program, by defts. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)
6585 Letter re: Allocation of Funds, Expedited Bail Project's Operating Expenses from Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6547: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 256 of 513

06/26/1997
06/26/1997
06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/26/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997 06/30/1997
07/01/1997 07/01/1997 07/01/1997
07/02/1997

6586 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral and Co. for invoice # 7328. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

6587 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to transfer from Dean Witter to Paine Webber the Treasury Notes stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

6588 MOTION concerning Discovery Limits, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

6589 MOTION concerning Population Data, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

6590 SUPPLEMENTAL mot on pltfs Proposed Alternative to a Receivership for the Correctional Health Program, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

6591 RESPONSE to defts mot req ext of time to answer interrogatories. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6568: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6572: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6573: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6574: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6575: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6582: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6567: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

6592 FACILITIES REHABILITATION PROGRAM QUARTERLY REPORT − March 30, 1997, by Jussef M. Galib − FRP Director. (il) (Entered: 06/30/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6584: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/02/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6592: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/02/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6583: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/02/1997)

6593

ORDER Approving Report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing first advancement of fine funds for the year starting July 1, 1997. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,000. as an advancement for the expenses to be incurred during the months of July, August and September, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/02/1997)

6594 ORDER for investment transactions with Paine Webber, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/02/1997)

6595 ORDER for transfer of investment to Dean Witter, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/02/1997)

6596 ORDER The Court accepts pltfs explanation. Pltf shall amend his complaint within 30 days in Civ. 95−2535, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/02/1997)

6597 SECOND Supplement to the pltfs Recommendation to Create a Correctional Health Services Corporation, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 07/03/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 257 of 513

07/02/1997
07/03/1997
07/09/1997
07/10/1997 07/11/1997 07/11/1997
07/15/1997 07/15/1997 07/17/1997 07/17/1997 07/17/1997 07/17/1997
07/17/1997
07/17/1997 07/17/1997 07/24/1997 07/24/1997
07/28/1997 07/28/1997 07/28/1997 07/29/1997

6598 MOTION for an Order directing defts to Adopt Classification Manual and to file Plan for Implementing and Evaluating the Manual, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 07/03/1997)
6599 ORDER, The Court appoints John Boston to present the testimony of Aida Guzman Font, etc., as stated herein. set Some Disposition Hearing for 9:00 8/18/97 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/03/1997)
6600 URGENT mot req status conf with respect to Class Representation and Procedure at the hrg set for 8/18/97 on the Correctional Health Program, by pltfs class. (il) (Entered: 07/10/1997)
6601 MOTION for atty fees for the month of June, 1997 for atty Bruce J. McGiverin in the amt of $1,406.67. (il) (Entered: 07/14/1997)
6602 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's time and expenses during the month of June, 1997 (il) (Entered: 07/15/1997)
6605 ORDER the Itemized statement of Vincent M. Nathan for the period of June, 1997 is approved. The Clerk is ordered to transfer the amt of $202,083.67 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/17/1997)
6603 APPLICATION for permission to file under seal by Vincent M. Nathan w/envelope attached. (il) (Entered: 07/15/1997)
6604 COMPREHENSIVE Report of the Expert Witness (five vols) (il) (Entered: 07/15/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6591: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/17/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6590: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/17/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6597: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/17/1997)
6606 ORDER The Court will advance to Mr. McGiverin the sum of $1,280. for fees during the month of May, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/17/1997)
6607 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,406.67 payable to Mr. McGiverin for expenses during the month of June, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/17/1997)
6608 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's June 1997 Invoice, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 07/18/1997)
6609 ONE−HUNDRED ONE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project. (il) (Entered: 07/18/1997)
6610 INFORMATIVE mot submitting report detailing the current balance of the Accounts for the month of June, 1997, by defts. (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
6611 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
6612 SUBMISSION of Accounting for Fine Funds held by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6589: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6588: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6602: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 258 of 513

07/29/1997 07/29/1997 07/29/1997 08/01/1997 08/05/1997 08/05/1997 08/05/1997 08/05/1997 08/08/1997
08/08/1997 08/08/1997 08/13/1997 08/13/1997
08/13/1997 08/14/1997 08/15/1997 08/18/1997 08/18/1997
08/18/1997
08/18/1997 08/18/1997 08/19/1997

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6609: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6608: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6603: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/30/1997)
6613 MOTION req findings from Court Inspection of the Bayamon Regional Detention Center, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6611: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6610: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6612: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
6614 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $561.60 for Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of July, 1997. (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
6615 FINAL Supplement to pltfs specific alternative to the Court's expert witness recommendation that a receiver be appointed to solve the Correction Health Program Crisis, by pltfs class. (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
6616 NOTICE of Closing of San Juan Office and Application to remain on certificate of service, by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
6617 ITEMIZED Statement of Time and Expenses during the month of July, 1997, by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 08/12/1997)
6618 ITEMIZED Statement of John Boston's Time and Expenses for the month of July, 1997. (il) (Entered: 08/19/1997)
6619 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to transfer the amt of $202,083.67 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/19/1997)
6620 INITIAL Response to pltfs mot on the Correctional Health Program, by equitable defts. (il) (Entered: 08/19/1997)
6621 MOTION req. authorization to present witness out of order, by equitable defts. (il) (Entered: 08/19/1997)
6622 TRANSCRIPT OF ONSITE Inspection at Bayamon Correctional Institution on 4/1/97. (il) (Entered: 08/19/1997)
6623 ITEMIZED Statement of John Boston's Time and Expenses for the month of July, 1997. (il) (Entered: 08/19/1997)
6624 Minute entry: Hrg called on the correctional health program. Testimony for the pltfs hrd by Dr. Ernesto Torres, Dra. Aida Guzman and Dr. Angel Ramos. Hrg is continued for 8/19/97 at 9:30AM. Exhbs. 527−530,532−545 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1997)
6625 MOTION in limine to exclude Nathan's report on medical and mental health care from admission into evidence w/memorandum in support thereof by equitable defts. (il) (Entered: 08/20/1997)
6626 BRIEF in oppos to the admission of the Rule 706 expert's report on medical and mental health care, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 08/20/1997)
6627 SUPPLEMENT to their Correctional Health Program's Crisis Proposal by equitable defts. (il) (Entered: 08/20/1997)
6628 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral and Co. for invoice no. 7560 covering the accounting month of April, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/20/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 259 of 513

08/19/1997
08/20/1997 08/20/1997 08/21/1997 08/21/1997
08/22/1997 08/22/1997 08/22/1997 08/22/1997 08/22/1997 08/22/1997
08/25/1997 08/25/1997 08/25/1997 08/27/1997
08/27/1997
08/27/1997

6629 Minute entry: Second day of hrg on the correctional health program. Testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Hrg continues 8/20/97 at 9:00AM. Exhbs. 514−516,518−524,524(a),525,526,531,592,593,CT−1 through CT−6 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/22/1997)

6630 Minute entry: Third day of hrg on the correctional health program. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs. Hrg continues on 8/21/97 at 9:00AM. Exhbs. 543 through 591, CT−7 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/22/1997)

6631 BRIEF in Support of the Admission of the Rule 706 Expert's Report on Medical and Mental Health Care. (il) (Entered: 08/22/1997)

6632 SUBMISSION of Reports on Crowding (w/2 boxes attached) (il) (Entered: 08/22/1997)

6636

Minute entry: Fourth day of hrg on the correctional health program. Lead counsel req protective order be issued or prior order be extended. The Court states that he will be the one to pass on the credibility of the witnesses. Court states that prior protective order was issued to cover any person affected at work because of their testimony in this case. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Hrg is continued for 8/22/97 at 9:30AM. Exhbs. 594 through 600 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

6634 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $680.72 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for the months of July, 1997. (il) (Entered: 08/25/1997)

6635 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 08/25/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6620: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/25/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6621: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/25/1997)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6623: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/25/1997)

6637 Minute entry: Fifth day of hrg on the correctional health program. Further testimony on behalf of pltf is hrd. Mr. Garcia is granted until Monday to advise if he will depose certain gov't officials. Hrg is continued for 9/15/97 at 9:00AM. exhbs. 601−604 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

6638 INFORMATIVE mot on calling additional witnesses by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

6639 ONE−HUNDRED TWO Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

6640 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's July, 1997 invoice, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

6641

ORDER directing transfer of fine monies to support the University of Puerto Rico's Pilot Training Project. The Clerk shall transfer the sum of $334,912.33 to the UPR to defray the costs incurred in this training project in 1997. UPR may seek two additional annual installments, each in the amt of $166,314.33 to support the second and third years of the Institute's operation, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

6642

ORDER that a check be issued to the Secretary of the Treasury of the Commonwealth of PR in the amt of $1.5 million to cover the expenses of the Clendo contract for key personnel of the Correctional Health Program. Defts req until 9/24/97 to file a detailed proposal regarding the current Correctional Health Program's budget is hereby granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

6643 MOTION req Use of Fine Funds for Certain Contracts of the Correctional Health Program, by defts. (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 260 of 513

08/27/1997 08/27/1997 09/02/1997 09/03/1997 09/05/1997 09/12/1997 09/12/1997 09/12/1997 09/12/1997 09/15/1997
09/16/1997
09/17/1997
09/17/1997
09/18/1997
09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997
09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997

6644 ORDER for the transfer of Investments to Merrill Lynch, Inc. from Dean Witter. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)
6645 ORDER for investment transactions with Merrill Lynch Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)
6646 MOTION submitting Progress Report for the State Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file the Report in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)
6647 ORDER prohibiting reprisals against witnesses. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1997)
6648 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $146.33 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, 1997. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6649 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg held before Judge Perez Gimenez on 8/18/97, by B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6650 Informative Motion by Carlos Morales−Feliciano re: atty change of address. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6651 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: account balances for the month of July, 1997 sent to pts. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6652 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Time and Expenses for the period of July 28th thru August 31, 1997. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6653 Minute entry: Sixth day of hrg on the correctional health program. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Hrg is continued on 9/16/97 at 9:00AM. Exhbs. 605−608, 613−620 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6654 Minute entry: Seventh day of hrg on the correctional health program. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Pltfs rest. Hrg continues on 9/17/97 at 9:00AM. Exhbs. CT−8,CT−9,CT−10,CT−11,609−612,621,622,623 and A. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6655 Minute entry: Eighth day of hrg on the correctional health program. Testimony on behalf of defts is hrd. Defts rest. Hrg continues on 9/18/97 at 9:00AM. Exhbs. B and C admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6656 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $146.33 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of August, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
6657 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6638: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6639: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6635: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6613: The Administrator of Correction, Zoe Laboy is granted a period of 20 days to submit any statement she wishes to make, in writing anent the conditions of Bayamon 308 on the date of the Court's visit. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6640: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6646: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6632: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 261 of 513

09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997 09/18/1997
09/22/1997 09/22/1997 09/24/1997 09/24/1997
09/24/1997 09/24/1997 09/24/1997 09/26/1997 09/26/1997 09/26/1997 09/26/1997

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6616: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)

6658 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $561.60 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of July, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)

6659 ORDER the Clerk shall transfer the amt of $85,635.48 from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)

6660 ORDER the Clerk shall transfer the amt of $197,887.86 from the fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/22/1997)

6661 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 8/19/97, by CR B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6662 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 8/20/97, by CR B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6663 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 8/21/97, by CR B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6664 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 8/22/97, by CR B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6665 Minute entry: Ninth day of hrg on correctional health program. Testimony of Vincent Nathan is hrd. All pts rest. The issue stands submitted. Transcripts of hrgs are req. Pts are to submit proposed findings of fact. Exhbs. CT−12, CT−13 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6666 Letter mot bringing to the Court's attention a series of alleged non−compliances with the stipulation in this case. (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6667 ORDER letter mot sent by Mr. Jorge Rondon Melendez dated 4/2/97 is ordered filed and made part of the record. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6668 ORDER The order vacated 9−18−97 (dkt#6660) is hereby vacated. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6669

AMENDED ORDER The order dtd 8/9/97 and filed 8/13/97 (dkt#6619) is hereby amended nunc pro tunc as follows: The period covering the itemized statement of Vincent M. Nathan's fees and expenses is July 1st through July 27, 1997 and not July lst through July 31, 1997. The correct amount of money on line four of the last paragraph is $197,877.86 not $202,083.67. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/24/1997)

6670 ONE−HUNDRED THREE Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by A. Ravelo Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1997)

6671 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's August, 1997 Invoice, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1997)

6672 MOTION for approval of a Budget for the Civil Action and Education Corporation and for disbursement of funds, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 09/25/1997)

6673 JOINT PROPOSAL concerning Correctional Health Program by pltf class and defts. (il) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2011: # 1 Exhibit A) (cm). (Entered: 10/01/1997)

6674 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 9/15/97, by B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 10/01/1997)

6675 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 9/16/97, by B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 10/01/1997)

6676 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 9/17/97, by B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 10/01/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 262 of 513

09/26/1997 09/30/1997 09/30/1997 10/02/1997 10/03/1997 10/06/1997 10/06/1997 10/06/1997 10/08/1997 10/08/1997 10/08/1997 10/08/1997 10/08/1997 10/09/1997 10/09/1997
10/09/1997
10/10/1997 10/15/1997
10/15/1997 10/15/1997

6677 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 9/18/97, by CR B. Vazquetelles. (il) (Entered: 10/01/1997)
6678 MOTION for release of Fine Funds to purchase Computer Equipment and Supplies for Correctional Health Program. (il) (Entered: 10/01/1997)
6679 INFORMATIVE mot detailing the current balance of the Accounts for the month of August, 1997 in accordance with Paragraph 24 of the FRP Stipulation, by defts. (il) (Entered: 10/01/1997)
6680 MOTION req leave to withdraw as legal representative by Mercedes Trigo Ferraiuoli (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
6681 MOTION for atty fees in the amt of $520.73 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1997. (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
6682 SUBMISSION of Financial Statements and Supporting Schedules for Morales Feliciano Account, by Vincent M. Nathan (2 folders attached) (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
6683 ITEMIZED Statement of John Boston's Time and Expenses for the month of August, 1997. (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
6684 ORDER Concerning Classification Manual ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6651: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6657: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6670: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6671: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6679: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/09/1997)
6685 Report on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering the months of July, August and September, 1997, by Padre Pedro Gorena w/attachments. (ni) (Entered: 10/14/1997)
6686 ORDER to provide funding for the Civil Action and Education Corporation. The Clerk shall issue a check from the fine funds in the amt of $1,500,000. payable to the Civil Action and Education Corporation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6687 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $14,664.98 payable to the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico for the Computer Equipment for Correctional Health Infectology Program. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6688 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Time and Expenses during the month of September, 1997. (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6689 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,000. payable to the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad as an advancement for the expenses to be incurred during the months of October, November and December, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6690 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral in the amt of $1,625. for invoice #7580 for services provided in June, 1997 in relation to the accounting month of May, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6685: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 263 of 513

10/15/1997 10/15/1997 10/15/1997 10/16/1997 10/17/1997 10/20/1997 10/20/1997 10/21/1997 10/23/1997 10/23/1997 10/24/1997 10/24/1997 10/31/1997 10/31/1997 10/31/1997 10/31/1997 11/05/1997 11/07/1997 11/10/1997

6691 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $84,544.48 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6692 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral in the amt of $1,625. for invoice #7726 for services provided in July, 1997 in relation to the accounting month of June, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6693 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral in the amt of $1,625. for invoice #7840 for services provided in August, 1997 in relation to the accounting month of July, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6694 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $520.73 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of September, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6695 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6696 ORDER the Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $680.72 payable to Atty Bruce J. McGiverin for expenses during the month of July, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6680: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
6697 Minute entry: A meeting is set for 10/28/97 at 5:00PM to continue the discussions about the future proceedings to be followed in the litigation of this case. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/22/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6695: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/23/1997)
6698 INFORMATIVE mot detailing the current balance of the Accounts required under Paragraphs 22 and 23 and all activities in these accounts during the month of September, 1997, by defts. (il) (Entered: 10/29/1997)
6699 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's September, 1997 invoice in the amt of $52,759.09 by A. Ravelo Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 10/29/1997)
6700 One−Hundred and Four Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project for the month of September, 1997 by A. Ravelo, Acting Director (il) (Entered: 10/29/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6698: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/04/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6699: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/04/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6700: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/04/1997)
6701 SUBMISSION of Reviewed Financial Statements for the twelve month period ending March 31, 1997, by Vincent M. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 11/04/1997)
6702 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral and Company in the amt of $1,625. for the accounting month of August, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1997)
6703 EVALUATION of the Institute for the Technical and Occupational Career Garment Manufacturing Workshop at the Ponce Women and Young Adults Institution, by Rita Colon. (il) (Entered: 11/17/1997)
6704 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of Vincent N. Nathan's Time and Expenses during the period of October 1st thru October 31, l997 in the amt of $28,292.16. (il) (Entered: 11/17/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 264 of 513

11/10/1997 11/12/1997
11/18/1997
11/18/1997 11/20/1997
11/21/1997 11/24/1997 11/24/1997 11/24/1997
11/26/1997
11/26/1997 12/01/1997 12/02/1997 12/04/1997 12/08/1997 12/08/1997 12/08/1997 12/09/1997 12/10/1997 12/12/1997 12/12/1997 12/15/1997

6705 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing, by defts. (il) (Entered: 11/17/1997)

6706 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to transfer the amt of $28,292.16 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/17/1997)

6707

ORDER Mr. John Boston is ordered to file his proposed findings of fact and conclusion of law no later than 11/24/97. Counsel for pltf class, Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez and counsel for defts Atty Manuel Quilinchini shall file their proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law no later than 12/8/97. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1997)

6708 INFORMATIVE mot re new director of the facilities Rehabilitation Program Engineer Ramon Mellado. (il) (Entered: 11/21/1997)

6709 ORDER The clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $1,625. payable to Vila de Corral for invoice #8098 in relation to the accounting month of September, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/21/1997)

6710 ITEMIZED Statement of John Boston's Time and Expenses for the month of September, 1997. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

6711 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S OCTOBER 1997 INVOICE, by A. Ravelo. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

6712 One Hundred Five Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by A. Ravelo. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

6713 SUBMISSION OF Expert Witness' Revised Proposed Order appointing Receiver for Correctional Health Program and establishing Plan for Termination of Jurisdiction in the Area of Medical and Mental Health Care by V. Nathan. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

6714 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW CONCERNING MEDICAL AND MENTAL HEALTH CARE, BY JOHN BOSTON. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

6715 MOTION to correct hrg transcript by John Boston (il) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

6716 MOTION Submitting the FRP Quarterly Report by FRP Juseff M. Galib w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 12/02/1997)

6717 APPLICATION for atty fees for atty Harry Anduze in the amt of $156. for the month of November, 1997. (il) (Entered: 12/05/1997)

6718 MOTION for ext of time to file Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/05/1997)

6719 SUBMISSION of Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 12/12/1997)

6720 PLTFS Post hearing mot in oppos to the appointment of a receiver for the Correctional Health Program, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 12/12/1997)

6721 MOTION submitting Proposal by the Instituto de Banca y Comercio for Use of Fine Funds, by defts. w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 12/12/1997)

6722 Proof of service of discovery req by pltf class (il) (Entered: 12/12/1997)

6723 Itemized Statement of John Boston's time and expenses during the month of October, 1997. (il) (Entered: 12/12/1997)

6724 ITEMIZED Statement of John Boston's Time and Expenses for the month of November, 1997. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1997)

6725 MOTION for ext of time to file Findings of Fact and Conclusion of Law by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1997)

6726 MOTION submitting Proposed Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law by the Equitable Defts. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1997)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 265 of 513

12/15/1997
12/16/1997 12/16/1997 12/17/1997 12/19/1997 12/19/1997 12/19/1997
12/22/1997 12/22/1997 12/24/1997
12/29/1997 12/29/1997
12/30/1997 12/30/1997
12/31/1997 12/31/1997 01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998

6727 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by defts. (il) (Entered: 12/16/1997)
6728 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of Vincent Nathan's Time and Expenses for the month of November, 1997. (il) (Entered: 12/19/1997)
6729 INFORMATIVE on change of governor's personal representative, by Jose A. Fuentes Agostini (il) (Entered: 12/19/1997)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6716: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 12/17/1997)
6730 ONE−HUNDRED SIX FINANCIAL REPORT of the Expedited Bail Project by A. Ravelo Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6731 EXPEDITED BAIL PROJECT'S November 1997 Invoice in the amt of $55,227.19 by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6732 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $52,307.59 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation for expenditures during the month of November, 1997 by Vincent M. Nathan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6733 MOTION to strike portions of defts proposed findings of fact, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6734 INFORMATIVE mot on possible change of lead counsel, by equitable defts. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6735 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of Oct, Nov. and December, 1997. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6736 MOTION submitting corrected proposed finding of fact, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6737 Declaration in response to pltfs posthrg mot in oppos to the appointment of a receiver for the Correctional Health Program, by John Boston (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6738 RESPONSE to Proposal by the Instituto de Banca y Comercio for the use of Fine Funds, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6739 PLTFS recommendation to ext funding for the Sistema de Educacion Universitaria Externa Program at Administration of Correction Penal Institutions, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6740 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6741 MOTION req continuance of hrg set for 1/12/98, by equitable defts. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6742 REQUEST for authorization to Use one Module of the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital for other purposes, by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6743 RESPONSE to pltfs Proposal on the Use of Fine Funds for the SEDUE Program, by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6741: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6744 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of John Boston's time and expenses during the month of November, 1997. (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6744: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 67ll: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 266 of 513

01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998 01/09/1998
01/13/1998 01/13/1998 01/13/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/14/1998 01/20/1998

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6712: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6722: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6723: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6718: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6710: Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6745 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $156. payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of November, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/13/1998)
6746 PLTFS response to defts mot req continuance of hrg. (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
6747 PLTFS reply to defts response to pltfs proposal on the Use of Fine Funds for the SEDUE Program and req for leave to file reply. (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
6748 MOTION req ext of time to answer interrogatories, by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6682: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6721: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6701: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6708: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6725: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6729: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6705: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6703: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6727: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6683: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6681: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6728: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6724: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
6749 MOTION to strike declaration for response by Special Counsel, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/15/1998)
6750 MOTION to submit corrected text of Mot to strike declaration for response by Special Counsel, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/26/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 267 of 513

01/20/1998 01/21/1998
01/22/1998 01/22/1998 01/26/1998 01/27/1998 01/27/1998 01/27/1998 01/28/1998 01/28/1998 01/28/1998
01/30/1998
02/04/1998 02/09/1998
02/11/1998 02/11/1998 02/11/1998 02/17/1998 02/18/1998
02/23/1998 02/23/1998 02/23/1998

6751 OPPOSITION to defts req for authorization to use Module of the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 01/26/1998)
6752 ORDER Approving Report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing third advancement for the year starting July 1, l996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/26/1998)
6753 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing by defts. (il) (Entered: 01/26/1998)
6754 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of Vincent Nathan's Time and Expenses for the month of December, 1997. (il) (Entered: 01/26/1998)
6756 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's December, 1997 Invoice, by A. Ravelo. (il) (Entered: 01/29/1998)
6755 ONE−HUNDRED Seven Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 01/29/1998)
6757 MOTION req leave to withdraw as counsel for defts, by Manuel A. Quilinchini. (il) (Entered: 01/29/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6757: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/29/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6753: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/29/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6754: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/29/1998)
6758 ORDER Regarding Access to Administration of Correction Facilities by Representatives of the pltf class. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 01/29/1998)
6759 MOTION for OSC why defts should not be held in contempt for holding inmates in admission cells in violation of the Court's orders, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1998)
6760 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez by Elfrick Mendez−Morales (il) (Entered: 02/13/1998)
6761 ORDER Defts are ordered to prepare a detailed plan on its proposal to share the Psychiatric Correctional Hospital with the Dept of Health before 2/23/98, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/13/1998)
6762 MOTION req ext of time to file response to pltfs req to find defts in contempt of Court, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1998)
6763 MOTION submitting declaration of Aida Guzman Font by John Boston. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1998)
6764 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent Nathan's Time and Expenses for the month of January, 1998. (il) (Entered: 02/13/1998)
6765 RESPONSE in oppos to defts req for ext of time to respond to pltfs contempt mot. (il) (Entered: 02/24/1998)
6766 MOTION in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by gov't defts. (w/attachs.) (il) (Entered: 02/24/1998)
6767 Designation of Alternate Lead Counsel Christopher A. Jenkings during 2/17 − 2/26/98, by Atty Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (il) (Entered: 02/24/1998)
6768 MOTION req ext of time to submit plan for temporary housing of patients at the Psychiatric Correctional Hospital, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/24/1998)
6769 MOTION req. additional legal representation by Atty Charles S. Fax, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 02/24/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 268 of 513

02/23/1998
02/24/1998 02/24/1998 02/25/1998 02/26/1998
02/26/1998 02/26/1998 02/26/1998 02/26/1998 02/26/1998 03/02/1998
03/02/1998
03/04/1998
03/12/1998 03/16/1998 03/18/1998 03/24/1998
03/25/1998 03/25/1998 03/26/1998
03/30/1998

6770 MOTION req leave to file reply to pltfs oppos to defts req for ext of time to file response to pltfs contempt mot, by gov't defts. (il) Modified on 06/12/1998 (Entered: 02/24/1998)
6771 INFORMATIVE mot regarding Expedited Bail Project's January, 1998 Invoice, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
6772 ONE−Hundred Eight Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by A. Ravelo (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
6773 CK # 01688859 in the amt of $1,500,000. of the Commonwealth of PR regarding reimbursement of funds granted on 8/27/97 (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
6774 Transferring the amt of $130,000. for the months of March and April 1998, to Acct. No. 501000033 Banco Santander Puerto Rico (Expedited Bail Project) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6755: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6756: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6760: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6762: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6764: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
6775 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral and Co. in the amt of $1,625. invoice # 8501 covering the services provided in December, 1997 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
6776 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral and Co. in the amt of $1,625. invoice #8502 covering the services during the month of January, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/03/1998)
6777 ORDER for investment transaction with Merrill Lynch Inc. in the amt of $2,501,922.03. ( signed by Judge Daniel R. Dominguez for Judge Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 03/10/1998)
6778 MOTION for an order for payment of fifty percent of the salary of the FRP Director from the Fine Fund Money, by defts. (il) (Entered: 03/13/1998)
6779 INFORMATIVE MOT advising that deft withdraw their req to use a unit of the PCH for non−correctional patients. (il) (Entered: 03/24/1998)
6780 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M.Nathan's time and expenses for the month of February, 1998. (il) (Entered: 03/24/1998)
6781 MOTION req ext of time to answer interrogatories and req for production of documents regarding inmates housed in admission cells, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 03/26/1998)
6782 ONE−HUNDRED Nine Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project for the month of February, 1998, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 03/26/1998)
6783 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's February, 1998 invoice, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 03/26/1998)
6784 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req to file it in Spanish w/attachs, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/01/1998)
6785 RESPONSE in oppos to pltfs mot to show cause dkt#6759, by defts (il) (Entered: 04/01/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 269 of 513

03/30/1998 04/01/1998 04/06/1998 04/07/1998 04/14/1998 04/15/1998 04/21/1998 04/22/1998
04/22/1998
04/22/1998
04/22/1998
04/22/1998 04/22/1998 04/23/1998 04/23/1998 04/23/1998 04/23/1998 04/23/1998

6786 REPORT on the Use of Find Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester Covering the months of January, February and March, l998, by Padre Pedro Gorena (il) (Entered: 04/01/1998)
6787 MOTION submitting Progress Reports for the State Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file reports in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/08/1998)
6788 MOTION submitting Fire Safety Audits and Corrective Action Plans purs to March 30, 1990 order and req to file them in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/08/1998)
6789 MOTION for an Order to Pay STV/Silver and Ziskind for services rendered and to report on steps taken by pltfs counsel to make arrangements for a paying officer, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 04/08/1998)
6790 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,000. to the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for advanced payments covering the months of April, May and June, l998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/16/1998)
6791 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req to file in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 04/16/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6778: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1998)
6792 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay Banco Santander the amt of $50. covering custody services on Acct. # 50−0344−00 for the period of Feb. 1, 1997 to January 31, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1998)
6793 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay Banco Santander the amt of $50. covering the custody services on Acct # 50−0005−00 for the period of Feb. 1, 1997 to January 31, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1998)
6794 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay Invoice No. 8567 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral covering the services provided in Feb.1998 in relation to the accounting month of January, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1998)
6795 ORDER The Clerk is hereby ordered to pay Invoice No. 8566 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral covering the services provided in Feb. 1998 in relation to the accounting month of Dec. 1997 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/23/1998)
6796 Informative Motion by Carlos Morales−Feliciano re: atty change of address. (il) (Entered: 04/23/1998)
6797 MOTION SUBMITTING facilities Rehabilitation Program Quarterly Reports w/attachment by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez (il) (Entered: 04/23/1998)
6798 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez by John F. Conrad (il) (Entered: 04/24/1998)
6799 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: atty change of address. (il) (Entered: 04/24/1998)
6800 Informative Motion by Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez re: atty Eduardo Estrella's change of address (il) (Entered: 04/24/1998)
6801 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Johnny Colon, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez by Eduardo R. Estrella (il) (Entered: 04/24/1998)
6802 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's time and expenses covering the period of March, 1998. (il) (Entered: 04/24/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 270 of 513

04/23/1998
04/27/1998 04/27/1998 04/27/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998

6803 ORDER the Clerk shall transfer the amt of $12,119.03 from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 04/24/1998)
6804 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Time and Expenses for the month of March, 1998. (il) (Entered: 04/30/1998)
6805 ONE−Hundred Ten Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project by A. Ravelo (il) (Entered: 04/30/1998)
6806 Informative Mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's March, 1998 Invoice, by A. Ravelo. (il) (Entered: 04/30/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6791: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6781: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6787: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6784: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6798: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6799: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6801: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6788: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6806: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6771: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6805: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6783: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6782: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6772: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6771: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6796: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6797: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6772: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)
6807 ORDER (PG) The Clerk will transfer the amt of $21,693.22 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Ligitation purs to Itemized Statement of Vincent M. Nathan for the period of February 1 through February 28, l998. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 271 of 513

04/30/1998 04/30/1998 04/30/1998 05/04/1998 05/15/1998 05/15/1998 05/15/1998 05/18/1998 05/18/1998
05/18/1998 05/19/1998 05/22/1998 05/26/1998 05/27/1998 05/27/1998 05/27/1998

6808 MOTION reg compliance w/Paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of June 3, 1994, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6779: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)

6809 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check payable to STV/Silver & Ziskind in the amt of $133,803.34 from the fine funds or interest for services performed purs to Court order dtd 10−17−96. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)

6810 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $113,720. from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation for Itemized statement of Vincent M. Nathan for the month of December, 1997. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/05/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6789: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/18/1998)

6811 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/18/1998)

6812 AMENDED mot for OSC why deft should not be held in contempt, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/18/1998)

6813 ORDER, set Status Conference for 10:00 5/27/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/18/1998)

6814

OPINION AND ORDER the partial jdmt entered on 1/26/96, be continued in full force and effect with respect to all health care issues. The Joint Health Coordinator shall submit directly to the Court, a compensation scale for Correctional Health Program employees, etc. Counsel for defts shall seek a reconsideration of the Comptroller's ruling on "on−call" physicians. The Chief Health Care Coordinator shall submit to the Court, an itemized list, with the approximate cost of all vehicles needed by the Correctional Health Program. The Executive Director of the Correctional Health Program shall submit to the Administrator of Corrections a detailed schedule of the Program's security staffing needs, etc., within 30 days. The Chief Health Care Coordinator shall submit within 30 days a report informing the progress or obstacles the Program has encountered in the present administrative arrangement concerning payroll, etc. Counsel for the pts shall inform the in writing within 10 days, of the progress made in organizing the not−for−profit corporation, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 05/18/1998)

6815 MOTION submitting Progress Reports for the State Penitentiary Complex and req for leave to file reports in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/19/1998)

6816 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of Vincent Nathan's Time and Expenses for the month of April, 1998. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1998)

6817 MOTION for ext of time to file response to pltfs May 15, l998 req for OSC why defts should not be held in contempt of Court, by gov't defts. (il) Modified on 05/28/1998 (Entered: 05/28/1998)

6818 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly Sanitation and Maintenance Inspection Audit and Corrective Action Plans purs to March 30, l998 order and req for leave to file them in Spanish w/attachs, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1998)

6819 REPORT on Correctional Health Care Not−For−Profit Corporation by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1998)

6820 MOTION to submit pltfs Report and Recommendation on a paying officer, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 05/28/1998)

Status Conference held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 272 of 513

05/27/1998
05/28/1998 05/28/1998 05/28/1998 05/29/1998
05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998

6822 Minute entry: S/C held. A tentative hrg date is set. Another S/C is set. set Some Disposition Hearing for 9:00 9/8/98 , and set Status Conference for 5:30 6/10/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
6821 HOGAR CATOLICO Santisima Trinidad − Narrativo y Presupuesto (il) (Entered: 05/28/1998)
6823 One Hundred Eleven Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by A. Ravelo Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
6824 Informative mot regarding the Expedited Bail Projects, April, 1998 Invoice, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
6825 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $12,241.13 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6770: Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6749: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6748: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6747: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6746: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6766: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6815: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6808: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6751: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6765: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6806: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6769: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6769: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6768: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6767: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6811: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6730: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6731: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 273 of 513

05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 05/29/1998 06/01/1998 06/01/1998 06/01/1998 06/01/1998 06/01/1998 06/01/1998 06/10/1998 06/10/1998
06/10/1998
06/12/1998
06/12/1998 06/12/1998

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6733: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6734: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6736: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6737: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6738: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6739: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6740: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6743: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6742: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6824: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6823: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6816: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6817: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6819: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6818: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/04/1998)

Status Conference held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6826

Minute entry: S/C held. An OSC hrg is set for 7/6/98 at 9:00AM for defts. Depositions dates are set. Discovery deadline is set. Another PTC is set. set Discovery deadline to 12/1/98 , set Pretrial Conference for 3:00 1/11/99 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez , and set Pretrial Order deadline to 3:00 1/11/99 ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6826 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Defts are OSC why they should not be held in contempt for violating the Court's order. Show Cause Hearing set for 9:00 7/6/98 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6827 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6828 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M.Nathan's time and expenses during the month of May, l998. (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6829 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $58,605.58 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation related to itemized statement of Vincent M. Nathan for expenses during the month of May, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 274 of 513

06/15/1998 06/15/1998
06/15/1998
06/15/1998
06/15/1998
06/15/1998 06/17/1998 06/17/1998 06/17/1998 06/19/1998 06/19/1998 06/19/1998 06/19/1998 06/23/1998 06/23/1998 06/23/1998 06/23/1998 06/24/1998 06/24/1998
06/25/1998 06/25/1998

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6827: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6830 ORDER Regarding compensation scale for correctional health employees and contractors. The Court approves the revised salary and compensation scale submitted by Dr. Aida Guzman on 6/3/98 and orders it filed for the record. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6831 Revised salary and compensation scale for salaried personnel and professionals under contract submitted by Dr. Aida Guzman, Chief Health Care Coordinator dtd 6/3/98. (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6832

ORDER regarding cessation of funding of Expedited Bail Project. Defts shall deposit into the registry of the Court any interest accrued on the $3.25 million bail fund along with an accounting thereof within 30 days. Director of the EBP shall submit within 30 days a final accounting of any advances for operational expenses for which defts have not reimbursed the Court, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6833 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6834 Information mot regarding depositions by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6820: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6835 One−Hundred Twelve Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

6836 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's May, 1998 Invoice, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 06/18/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6835: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6834: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6836: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6833: Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

6837 CHECK # 1879072 in the amount of $ 10,592.12 payable to John Boston issued on 6/11/98. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

6838 CHECK # 1879071 in the amount of $ 5,709.75 payable to John Boston issued on 6/11/98. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

6839 CHECK # 1879073 in the amount of $ 16,299.51 payable to John Boston issued on 6/11/98. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

6840 CHECK # 1879093 in the amount of $ 35,242.85 payable to John Boston issued on 6/16/98. (il) (Entered: 06/23/1998)

6841 Informative mot regarding depositions, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 06/26/1998)

6842 ORDER Approving the Use of Find Funds to pay tuition and materials for inmates enrolled in vocational training offered by Instituto de Banca y Comercio. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/26/1998)

6843 Certificate of notice to defts of pltfs witnesses for hearing on admission cells, by pltfs. (il) (Entered: 06/26/1998)

6844 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of April, May and June 1998. (il) (Entered: 06/26/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 275 of 513

06/25/1998
06/25/1998
06/26/1998 06/29/1998
06/29/1998
06/29/1998
06/30/1998
06/30/1998 06/30/1998 07/02/1998 07/02/1998 07/06/1998 07/06/1998 07/06/1998 07/07/1998 07/07/1998 07/08/1998 07/08/1998 07/10/1998 07/13/1998 07/13/1998

6845 ORDER directing payments from fine monies on a monthly basis to Aida Guzman Font, Chief Health Care Coordinator and Ramon Mellado, Director of FRP. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/26/1998)

6846

ORDER directing retun of fine monies. Mr. Nathan shall proceed to close the STV Silver and Ziskind Account, the Hepatitis B Account, the Zarzal Account and the Chaplaincy Account, return those funds and provide a complete accounting of all transactions, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/26/1998)

6847 Minute entry:, set Show Cause Hearing for 9:00 7/13/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1998)

6848 ORDER The Clerk shall pay invoice #8961 inthe amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral and Co. in relation to the accounting for the month of February, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1998)

6849 ORDER The Clerk shall pay invoice # 8962 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral and Co. in relation to the accounting for the month of March, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1998)

6850 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to pay invoice # 9099 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral and Co. in relation to the accounting for the month of April, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/30/1998)

6851 ORDER Approving the Report of Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing third advancement of fine funds for the year starting July 1, 1996. The Clerk shall issue a ck. in the amt of $22,000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/07/1998)

6852 Interim Report on Close of Fiscal Year for the Civil Action and Education Corporation, by Carlos V.Garcia Gutierrez. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6853 URGENT mot regarding purchase of vehicles for the Correctional Health Program, by Pltf class (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6854 MOTION regarding On−Call Medical Services, by defts. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6855 ORDER regarding the purchase of vehicles for Correctional Health Program ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6856 MOTION for a writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum, by pltf class (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6857 APPLICATION for atty fees for the month of June, 1998 by Atty Harry Anduze. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6858 MOTION opposing pltfs amended mot for OSC why defts should not be held in contempt w/memo in support thereof, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6859 MOTION req continuance of hrg set for 7/13/98 by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6860 MOTION regarding printing error of mot in oppos to pltfs amended mot for OSC w/corrected pages attached, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/08/1998)

6861 INFORMATIVE mot regarding the Expedited Bail Project's June, 1998 Invoice, by Angelo Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 07/13/1998)

6862 One−Hundred Thirteen Financial Report of the Expedited Bail Project, by A. Ravelo, Acting Director. (il) (Entered: 07/13/1998)

6863 MOTION introducing FRP Quarterly Report, by Ramon Mellado, FRP Director. (il) (Entered: 07/13/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6859: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6860: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 276 of 513

07/13/1998 07/13/1998 07/13/1998 07/13/1998 07/13/1998
07/15/1998 07/15/1998
07/15/1998 07/15/1998 07/15/1998
07/15/1998 07/16/1998 07/16/1998 07/16/1998
07/17/1998 07/17/1998
07/21/1998 07/21/1998

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6856: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

WRIT of H/C Ad Testificandum issued to Warden, Ponce PR (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6864 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $530. payable to Atty Anduze for expenses during the month of June, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6865

Minute entry: Hrg called on pltfs req for defts to show cause why they should not be held in contempt for violating several orders related to the admission cells (dkt#6759/6812). Testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Hrg continues on 7/15/98 at 9:00 AM. Pltfs exhbs. 1−14 filed. continues Show Cause Hearing for 9:00 7/15/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 07/21/1998 (Entered: 07/21/1998)

Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6866 Minute entry: Second day of hrg held. Further testimony on behalf of pltf is hrd. Hrg continues on 7/16/98. Pltfs exhbs. 15−19 filed. continues Show Cause Hearing for 9:30 7/16/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6867 ORDER prohibiting reprisals against witnesses, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6868 MOTION submitting outstanding reimbursements due for advancements of the EBP's operating expenses, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6869 MOTION to inform final accounting of all funds advanced to the Operational Expense of the EBP, expense reimbursements due and interests accrued on the $3.5 million bail fund w/attach., by A. Ravelo (Receipt # 94608 in the amt of $234,572.30). (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6870 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file it in Spanish, by gov't defts. w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6871 ITEMIZED statement of Vincent M.Nathans time and expenses for the month of June, 1998 (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6872 Minute entry: Third day of hrg held. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Hrg continues on 7/17/98. continues Show Cause Hearing for 9:30 7/17/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6873 Minute entry: Fourth day of hrg held. Further testimony on behalf of pltf is hrd. Hrg continues on 7/21/98. continues Show Cause Hearing for 9:00 7/21/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

6874 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $47,403.99 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/21/1998)

Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 07/22/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 277 of 513

07/21/1998
07/22/1998
07/22/1998 07/22/1998
07/23/1998 07/23/1998
07/31/1998 08/03/1998 08/04/1998 08/06/1998 08/06/1998 08/06/1998 08/06/1998 08/06/1998 08/06/1998 08/11/1998
08/12/1998 08/12/1998 08/17/1998 08/18/1998
08/18/1998

6875 Minute entry: Fifth day of hrg held. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs hrd. Hrg continues on 7/22/98. Pltfs exhbs. 20−54 admitted. continues Show Cause Hearing for 9:30 7/22/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/22/1998)
6876 MOTION submitting remaining reimbursements due for Court advancements of EBP's operating expenses, ck# 00000542/00000543 in the amt of $57,759.65 and $131,372.63 receipt # 94703. (il) (Entered: 07/28/1998)
Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 07/28/1998)
6877 Minute entry: Sixth day of hrg held. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is hrd. Hrg continues 7/23/98. Pltfs exhbs. 55−85 admitted. continues Show Cause Hearing for 9:00 7/23/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/28/1998)
Show Cause Hearing held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (il) (Entered: 07/28/1998)
6878 Minute entry: Seventh day of hrg held. Further testimony on behalf of pltf is hrd. Hrg continues on 8/3/98. Pltfs exhbs. 86−136 admitted. continues Show Cause Hearing for 1:30 8/3/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 07/28/1998)
6879 MOTION req S/C by pltf class (il) (Entered: 08/04/1998)
6880 MOTION for return of inmates' files, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 08/04/1998)
6881 ORDER regarding Medical and Mental Health Plan. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6882 TRANSCRIPT filed for OSC hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 7/13/98 (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6883 TRANSCRIPT filed for OSC hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 7/15/98 (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6884 TRANSCRIPT filed for OSC hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 7/16/98 (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6885 TRANSCRIPT filed for OSC hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 7/17/98 (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6886 TRANSCRIPT filed for OSC hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 7/21/98. (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6887 TRANSCRIPT filed for OSC hrg proceedings held before Judge Perez−Gimenez on 7/22/98 (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6888 ORDER The Clerk shall issue make a payment in the amt of $1,625. for invoice # 9147 to Vila de Corral and Co. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER dkt# 6879: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6880: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/13/1998)
6889 ITEMIZED statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Time and Expenses for the month of July, 1998. (il) (Entered: 08/19/1998)
6890 ORDER, setting hrg on Comprehensive Report of the Expert Witness set Some Disposition Hearing for 9:00 1/19/99 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/19/1998)
6891 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/19/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 278 of 513

08/19/1998 08/20/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/24/1998 08/25/1998
08/28/1998
08/31/1998 08/31/1998 08/31/1998
08/31/1998
09/03/1998
09/03/1998
09/08/1998

6892 MOTION regarding compliance w/Paragraph 24 of the FRP Stipulation of June 3, 1994, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
6893 Report re: Informal Bidding Process for the Correctional Health Program's Vehicle Purchases, by Correctional Health Program (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6854: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 6852: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6869: noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6861: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6862: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6863: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6868: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt#6870: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6891: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6889: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
6894 Minute entry: OSC hrg on defts as to why they should not be held in contempt for violating several orders is set for 8/31/98. set Show Cause Hearing for 9:00 8/31/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 08/28/1998)
6895 ORDER The Clerk is transfer the amt of $7,388.88 from fine funds under the Court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6893: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6892: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1998)
6896 ORDER the Clerk is hereby ordered to pay invoice # 9300 in the amt of $1,625. to Vila de Corral in relation to the accounting of the month of June, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1998)
6897 Minute entry: OSC hrg set for today is continued at this time. Another date will be selected once the Court has consulted with the attys in this case. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1998)
6898 ORDER The Clerk is ordered to issue a check in the amt of $25,129. from fine funds under the court's control to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. for the month of July, l998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1998)
6899 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $18,344. from the fine funds under the Court's control to Curnyn Consulting Ltd., for the month of June, 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/04/1998)
6900 Correctional Health Report on the Implementation of the Medical Cadre, by (il) Modified on 09/11/1998 (Entered: 09/11/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 279 of 513

09/08/1998 09/09/1998 09/09/1998 09/10/1998 09/11/1998 09/11/1998 09/14/1998 09/15/1998 09/15/1998 09/15/1998 09/15/1998 09/16/1998 09/16/1998
09/17/1998 09/28/1998
09/29/1998 09/29/1998 09/29/1998 10/01/1998 10/05/1998

6901 Application for atty fees for the month of August, 1998 in the amt of 280.80 payable to Atty Harry Anduze (il) (Entered: 09/11/1998)

6902 ITEMIZED Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's time and expenses for the month of Aug, 1998. (il) (Entered: 09/11/1998)

6903 MOTION regarding compliance w/Paragraph 24 of the FRCP Stipulation, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/11/1998)

6904 ORDER for Investment Transactions with Merrill Lynch, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/11/1998)

6905 AMENDED ORDER The Clerk of the Court is to issue a check in the amt of $25,118.37 from the fine funds under the Court's control to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/11/1998)

6906 ORDER The Clerk shall transfer the amt of $44,370.03 from fine funds under the court's control to the Center for the Study of Law and Institutional Litigation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/14/1998)

6907 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 09/16/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6903: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/16/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6900: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/16/1998)

6908 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $280.80 payable to Atty Harry Anduze for expenses during the month of Aug. 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/16/1998)

6909 Minute entry:, set Show Cause Hearing for 9:00 9/28/98 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/16/1998)

6910 REPORT on Progress and Obstacles encountered by the Correctional Health Program, by Aida Guzman Font. (il) (Entered: 09/30/1998)

6911 ORDER allowing unlimited access to Mr. Nathan, the Court's expert witness and his personnel to all the facilities of the Administration of Correction and to those facilities presently administered by private entities, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 6907: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/30/1998)

6915

Minute entry: Case called for continuation of hrg anent the admission cells. Defts' counsel is not present. Hrg is reset for 10/13/98. Defts are ordered to notify by 10/1/98 the final list of witnesses that they intend to present in support of their position. set Some Disposition Hearing for 9:00 10/13/98 ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6912 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez by Rick Nemcik−Cruz (il) (Entered: 09/30/1998)

6913 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Pedro Rossello−Gonzalez by Daliah Lugo−Auffant (il) (Entered: 09/30/1998)

6914 MOTION req ext of time to identify witnesses and for continuance of hrg set for 10−13−98, by defts. (il) (Entered: 09/30/1998)

6916 MOTION informing final situation of expedited Bail Project and req for operating expenses (il) (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6917 OPPOSITION to mot for ext of time and continuance of admissions cell hrg, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 10/06/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 280 of 513

10/05/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998
10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/06/1998 10/07/1998 10/08/1998 10/09/1998 10/13/1998
10/13/1998 10/13/1998

6918 APPLICATION for atty fees for the month of September in the amt of $331. by Atty Harry Anduze (il) (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6919 REPORT by Carmen L. Correa (Informe de Confinados cumpliendo sentencia en PRARIE & MDC Guaynabo) (il) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6920 REPORT by Carmen L. Correa (Informe Estadistico Mensual de Wackenhut Bayamon − Agosto 1998) (il) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6921 REPORT by Carmen L. Correa (Informe Estadistico Mensual de Servicios Correccionales de PR (Guayama, Ponce Adultos y Jovenes Adultos − Agosto 1998) (il) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6922 REPORT by Carmen L. Correa (Informe Estadistico Mensual de Area de Servicios Sociopenales Correspondiente al mes de Agosto 1998) (il) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6923 REPORT by Janet Rivera Rosado (Informe Estadistico del mes de Agosto 1998 e Informe to Tecnicos de Servicios Sociopenales) (il) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/06/1998)

6924 MOTION requesting leave to file a reply to pltf's opposition to the motion for extension of time and continuance filed on 9/28/98, filed by defts (with reply tendered) (mr) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/07/1998)

6925 SUPPLEMENTARY motion req postponement of continuance of hrg filed by defts (mr) Modified on 10/28/1998 (Entered: 10/07/1998)

6926 Informative Motion by Defendant−All re: atty Rick Nemcik and atty Daliah Lugo's correct address. (mr) (Entered: 10/07/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6914. The Court's calendar is so congested so as to make it definitely imposible to hold the continuation of the hrg during the month of Nov. The hrg was not held sooner for reasons defts know too well. The motion is denied ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER [6913−1] appear/appearance notice, Noted. signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER [6912−1] appear/appearance notice, Noted. signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

6927 ORDER for the Clerk to issue forthwith a check from the fine fund mentioned above in the amt of $331.00 payable to Harry Anduze Montano ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

6928 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting svcs w/attachment by Defendant−All (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1998)

6929 URGENT motion for immediate relief to alleviate crowding in admission areas filed by the pltf class (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 10/09/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6925. Denied. See our margin order of 10/2/98 (dkt #6914) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/14/1998)

6930

Minute entry: Eighth day of the hrg on pltfs' request for defts to show cause why they should not be held in comtempt for violating several orders related to the use of admission cells (dkts #6759 and 6812). Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow, 10/14/98, at 9:30am. Pltfs' exhs. 137−175, 177, 178 admitted ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 11/02/1998 (Entered: 10/14/1998)

6931 Report on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of July, Aug., and Sept. 1998 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 10/14/1998)

6932 Itemized Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's time and expenses (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 10/14/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 281 of 513

10/13/1998 10/13/1998 10/13/1998 10/14/1998 10/14/1998
10/15/1998 10/15/1998 10/15/1998 10/15/1998
10/15/1998
10/15/1998
10/16/1998 10/16/1998 10/16/1998 10/16/1998 10/19/1998 10/20/1998 10/22/1998 10/22/1998

6933 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and requesting leave to file documents in Spanish (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 10/14/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6924. Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/15/1998)

6934 BRIEF reply to the opposition to the motion for extension of time, filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 10/15/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6934, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/15/1998)

6935

Minute entry: Ninth day of hrg re: dkts #6759 and 6812. Further testimony presented on behalf of pltfs. Their req for the record to be left open so they may offer these documents in evidence is granted. Testimony on behalf of defts is presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 9:00am. Pltfs' exh. 176 and defts' exh. A admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/16/1998)

6938 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting services by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., filed by defts (with attachments) (mr) Modified on 10/16/1998 (Entered: 10/16/1998)

6936 TRANSCRIPT filed for for further order to show cause hrg held on 10/13/98 (mr) (Entered: 10/16/1998)

6937 TRANSCRIPT filed for further order to show cause hrg held on 10/14/98 (mr) (Entered: 10/16/1998)

6939 Minute entry: Tenth day of hrg re: dkts #6759 and 6812. Further testimony on behalf of deft presented. Parties are granted 45 days to submit simultaneous proposed findings and conclusions of law ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/16/1998)

6940

ORDER (re: #6931) approving report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing third advancement of fine funds for the year starting 7/1/96. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,000.00 as an advancement for expenses to be incurred during the months of Oct., Nov., and Dec. 1998. By 1/5/99, the staff of the HCST shall submit an expense report on how these funds were used. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/16/1998)

6941 ORDER approving the itemized statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Fees and Expenses for the period of 9/1 − 9/30/98. These expenditures total $22,401.32. The Clerk is to transfer this amt from fine funds ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/16/1998)

6942 MOTION to dismiss pltfs' claims for damages by defts (mr) (Entered: 10/19/1998)

6943 Informative Motion by Atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez re: temporary absence from PR until 11/2/98. (mr) (Entered: 10/19/1998)

6944 EMERGENCY motion regarding the expedited bail project by pltfs (mr) (Entered: 10/19/1998)

6945 CHECK # 1879276 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued. (mr) (Entered: 10/19/1998)

6946 CHECK # 1879288 in the amount of $ 22,000.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued. (mr) (Entered: 10/20/1998)

6947 MOTION in compliance with paragraphs 56 of the "Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing" and request for leave to file documents in Spanish by defendants (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 10/21/1998)

6948 MOTION regarding defts' motion to dismiss claims for damages filed by pltfs (mr) (Entered: 10/23/1998)

6949 INFORMATIVE motion regarding exhibits from correctional health hearing filed by plaintiffs (mr) (Entered: 10/23/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 282 of 513

10/23/1998 10/23/1998 10/23/1998 10/26/1998 10/26/1998 10/26/1998
10/29/1998
10/29/1998 10/30/1998 10/30/1998 10/30/1998 10/30/1998 10/30/1998 10/30/1998 11/02/1998
11/02/1998 11/02/1998 11/02/1998 11/02/1998 11/02/1998 11/02/1998 11/02/1998

6950 MOTION for discovery order filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 10/26/1998)

6951 MOTION by Luis Del Valle to withdraw as counsel for defendants (mr) (Entered: 10/26/1998)

6952 MOTION requesting copies of exhibits from hrg on order to show cause, filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6952, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1998)

6953 OPPOSITION to pltfs' emergency motion regarding the Expedited Bail Project, filed by defendants (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1998)

6954

ORDER granting pltfs' motion req emergency funding for the Expedited Bail Project for an additional 30 days, in the amt of $20,000.00 (dkt #6944). If the Pretrial Services Office refuses to assume the cases transferred from the EBP, the defts shall return to this Court the 3.25 million dollars released to them under the Court's 6/15/98 order. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1998)

6955 MOTION requesting extension of time to answer "pltfs' first set of interrogatories and req for production of documents regarding matters to be addressed at January 1999 hrgs" by deft Adm. of Correction (mr) (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6956 MOTION to set aside order re: expedited bail project or for reconsideration (with attachments), filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6957 MOTION introducing FRP quarterly report by the FRP Director (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6958 Copy of Receipt # 96833 in the amount of $ 593,158.68 re: consigned check / Center for the Study of Law (mr) Modified on 11/08/1998 (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6959 Copy of Receipt # 96831 in the amount of $ 360.67 re: consigned check / Center for the Study of Law (mr) (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6960 Copy of Receipt # 96830 in the amount of $ 169,642.88 re: consigned check / Center for the Study of Law (mr) (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6961 Copy of Receipt # 96829 in the amount of $ 10,161.89 re: consigned check / Center for the Study of Law (mr) (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6962 ACCOUNTING pursuant to the Court's Order of 6/24/98, filed by Vincent Nathan (with attachments) (mr) Modified on 11/08/1998 (Entered: 11/03/1998)

6963 MOTION submitting the proposed budget estimate for the implementation of the Medical Cadre, filed by the Correctional Health Program (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 11/03/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6947, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6949, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6951, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6938, Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6953, Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6932, Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6931, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 283 of 513

11/02/1998 11/02/1998
11/02/1998
11/05/1998 11/05/1998 11/09/1998 11/09/1998
11/12/1998 11/12/1998 11/12/1998
11/16/1998 11/20/1998 11/20/1998 11/20/1998 11/20/1998 11/23/1998 11/23/1998
11/24/1998

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6933, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

6964 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625.00 re: invoice #9557, for svcs provided in Sept. 1998 in relation to the accounting month of August 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

6965 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625.00 re: invoice #9418 for svcs provided in Aug. 1998 in relation to the accounting month of July 1998 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1998)

6966 CHECK # 1879307 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Coral & Co. issued. (mr) (Entered: 11/09/1998)

6967 CHECK # 1879308 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Coral & Co. issued. (mr) (Entered: 11/09/1998)

6968 CHECK # 1879325 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman−Font, M.D. issued. (mr) (Entered: 11/10/1998)

6969 ORDER for the Adm. of Corrections to verify the information provided as to the cases listed herein, w/in 60 days, in order to assist the Court in determining whether these cases should remain active or otherwise be dismissed. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/10/1998)

6970 CHECK # 1879326 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued. (mr) (Entered: 11/13/1998)

6971 MOTION SUBMITTING progress report for the State Penitentiary Complex and request for leave to file documents in Spanish, filed by defendants (w/attachment) (mr) (Entered: 11/13/1998)

6972 ORDER re: Itemized Statement of Vincent M. Nathan's Fees and Expenses for 9/28 − 10/31/98. The Clerk is to transfer the amt of $57,472.33 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/13/1998)

6973 ITEMIZED statement of Vincent M. Nathan's time and expenses (mr) (Entered: 11/17/1998)

6974 MOTION req an order for disbursement of funds to finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation, filed by its President, Carlos Garcia−Gutierrez (mr) (Entered: 11/23/1998)

6975 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the "Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing" and req for leave to file documents in Spanish, filed by defendants (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 11/23/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6950, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/23/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6948, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/23/1998)

6976 MOTION for an order to approve the Correctional Health Scvs Corporation's budget proposal for 1999 natural year (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 11/24/1998)

6977

ORDER to implement the Medical Cadre Plan. The Clerk shall issue a check payable to the order of the Secretary of the Treasury of PR in the amt of $789,208.00 for the implementation of the Medical Cadre Plan first fiscal year 1999, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/24/1998)

6978 MOTION requesting extension of time to answer pltfs' second set of interrogatories and production of documents, filed by Government defendants (mr) Modified on 12/14/1998 (Entered: 11/25/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 284 of 513

11/25/1998 11/25/1998 11/25/1998 11/30/1998 11/30/1998 11/30/1998 12/02/1998 12/02/1998 12/03/1998 12/03/1998 12/03/1998 12/04/1998 12/04/1998
12/04/1998 12/04/1998 12/04/1998
12/04/1998 12/04/1998 12/04/1998 12/07/1998

6979 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting svcs by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the month of Oct. 1998 (not exh. 1 attached as stated) (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1998)
6980 Informative Motion regarding the transfer of the EBP to the PSO and request for procedural remedies, filed by defendants. (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1998)
6981 MOTION for John Conrad to withdraw as atty for defendants (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1998)
6982 PROPOSED Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, filed by pltf class (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1998)
6983 MOTION regarding contempt hearing and related matters, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1998)
6984 PROPOSED Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law, filed by defendants (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1998)
6985 MOTION for order to return EBP funds, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 12/03/1998)
6986 REQUEST for enlargement of time to respond to a "Motion for an Order to Approve Correctional Health Services Corporation Budget Proposal etc.", filed by the plaintiff class (mr) Modified on 01/04/1999 (Entered: 12/03/1998)
6987 MOTION to seal certain discovery, filed by defendants (mr) (Entered: 12/04/1998)
6988 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Plaintiffs by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina (mr) (Entered: 12/04/1998)
6989 MOTION for extension of time until 12/17/98 to respond to the motion regarding contempt hearing and related matters, filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1998)
6990 LETTER/MOTION informing on health problems and requesting the Court's intervention (in Spanish), by inmate Jose Alvarez Garcia (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1998)
6991 ORDER re: #6928, directing the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $31,408.75 from the fine funds under the court's control to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 12/23/1998 (Entered: 12/07/1998)
6992 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $8,580.00 from the fine funds under the Court's control to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1998)
6993 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check to the Civil Action and Education Corporation in the amt of $1,773,932.00, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #6976. The Budget Proposal for the 1999 Natural Year is approved in the amt of $5,660,795.00. Furthermore and pursuant to this motion, an amt of $432,000.00 is advanced from the 1999 year budget. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $432,000.00 forthwith to the Correctional Health Svcs Corporation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)
6994 ORDER for payment of svcs to Vila Del Corral & Co. for invoice 9781 in the amt of $1,625.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)
6995 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Co., for invoice 9780 in the amt of $1,625.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #6978, Granted as requested ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #6929, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 285 of 513

12/07/1998 12/07/1998 12/07/1998
12/07/1998
12/07/1998 12/07/1998 12/07/1998 12/07/1998 12/07/1998 12/07/1998 12/07/1998 12/08/1998 12/09/1998 12/09/1998 12/09/1998 12/09/1998 12/09/1998 12/10/1998 12/11/1998 12/11/1998 12/11/1998

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6962, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6957, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

6996 MOTION requesting extension of time up to 12/29/98 to file response to answer pltfs' motion for order to return EBP funds, filed by Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6986. The Court will like to have the attys for pltfs' class comments on the proposed budget. Nevertheless, the Court has already approved it and has advanced the sum of $432,000.00 so that the corp. may operate the next seven months. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6971, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6942, Denied ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6955, Moot ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6956, Denied ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6975, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6973, Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6973, Approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1998)

6997 CHECK # 1879360 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman issued. (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1998)

6998 CHECK # 1879375 in the amount of $ 8,580.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued. (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1998)

6999 CHECK # 1879374 in the amount of $ 31,408.75 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued. (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1998)

7000 CHECK # 1879373 in the amount of $ 1,773,932.00 payable to Civil Action Education Corp. issued. (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1998)

7001 CHECK # 1879359 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued. (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1998)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #6987, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1998)

7002 CHECKS # 1879371, #1879372 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 each, payable to Vila Del Coral & Co. issued. (mr) (Entered: 12/11/1998)

7003 RESPONSE to deft's motion to seal certain discovery, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 12/15/1998)

7004 MOTION requesting further assitance for the Expedited Bail Project, filed by pltf class (with exh. attached) (mr) (Entered: 12/15/1998)

7005

ORDER as to #6989, Granted. Defts shall respond no later than 12/17/98, as requested. As to #6990, Noted. Copy of inmate's letter−motion shall be sent to defts so that same may be forwarded to Correctional Health Svcs for investigation and action, if appropriate ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 01/04/1999 (Entered: 12/15/1998)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 286 of 513

12/14/1998 12/14/1998 12/15/1998 12/16/1998 12/17/1998 12/22/1998 12/23/1998 12/24/1998 12/29/1998 12/29/1998 12/30/1998 01/05/1999 01/07/1999 01/11/1999
01/12/1999 01/13/1999 01/13/1999 01/13/1999

7006 CHECK # 1879380 in the amount of $ 432,000.00 payable to Correctional Health Svcs, Corp issued. (mr) (Entered: 12/15/1998)

7007 OPPOSITION to pltfs' motion for order to return EBP funds and to the motion for disbursement of funds to pretrial service, filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/15/1998)

7008 ITEMIZED statement of Vincent Nathan's time and expenses (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/16/1998)

7009 MOTION for final extension of time until 12/27/98 to oppose pltfs' motion regarding contempt hrg and related matters and notice of change of office address, filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 12/17/1998)

7010 OPPOSITION to the motion regarding contempt hearing and related matters, filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 12/21/1998)

7011 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/23/1998)

7012 MOTIN to shorten time for response to the motion in opposition to the motion regarding contempt hrg and related matters until 1/8/99, filed by pltf class (mr) Modified on 01/12/1999 (Entered: 12/30/1998)

7013 MOTION for substitution of document attached to defts' opposition to the motion regarding contempt and related matters (with attachments), filed by Govt defendants (mr) (Entered: 12/30/1998)

7014 MOTION amending and clarifying contents of defts' motions of 12/17/98 and 12/24/98 and the exhs. attached thereto (with attachments), filed by Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 12/30/1998)

7015 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the "stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing" and req for leave to file documents in Spanish, filed by defendants (mr) (Entered: 12/30/1998)

7016 MOTION in compliance with Court order of 11/9/98, filed by Govt defendants (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/31/1998)

7017 APPLICATION for atty's fees for the month of Dec. 1998 pursuant to the order of 2/21/91, filed by Atty Harry Anduze (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 01/07/1999)

7018 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check from the fine fund in the amt of $343.20 payable to Harry Anduze Montano ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/08/1999)

7020

Minute entry: PTC held. List of expert witnesses discussed. Testimonies scheduled. Additional witnesses and exhibits also discussed. Mr. Fax states that the medical testimony will be given by doctors that are part of the Adm. of Corrections, and pltfs' attys have been talking to them ex parte. Mr. Garcia Gutierrez clarifies that they are not part of the Adm. of Corrections and are independent and under contract by the AOC ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7004, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/14/1999)

7019 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of Oct., Nov. and Dec. 1998 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/13/1999)

7021 ORDER granting pltfs' motion requesting further assistance for the Expedited Bail Project (#7004), in the amt of $20,000.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)

7022

ORDER approving the report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing third advancement of fine funds for the expenses to be incurred during the months of Jan., Feb., and March 1999. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,000.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 287 of 513

01/13/1999 01/13/1999 01/14/1999
01/14/1999 01/14/1999 01/15/1999 01/15/1999 01/15/1999
01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999
01/19/1999

7023 CHECK # 1879462 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued. (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)
7024 APPLICATION by Atty Barron L. Stroud to appear pro hac vice (filing fee not paid) (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)
7025 ORDER approving the Itemized Stmt of Vincent Nathan's Fees and Expenses and directing the Clerk of Court to transfer the amt of $120,450.25 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)
7026 CHECK # 1879461 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued. (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)
7027 CHECK # 1879463 in the amount of $ 789,208.00 payable to Secretary of the Treasury of PR issued. (mr) (Entered: 01/19/1999)
7028 ITEMIZED statement of Vincent M. Nathan's time and expenses for the period 12/1 − 12/31/98 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
7029 MOTION regarding compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of 6/3/94, filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
7030 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req for leave to file in Spanish, filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7010, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7009, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7003, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #6996, Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 01/20/1999 (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #6979, Noted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7016, Noted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7011, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7015, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7029, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7030, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
7031 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for the Plaintiff Class by Rosa M. Cruz−Niemiec (mr) (Entered: 01/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7012, Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7032 Minute entry: Hrg called on the comprehensive report submitted by Vincent Nathan on 7/15/97. Testimony on behalf of pltfs is presented. Hrg continued for tomorrow at 9:00am. Pltfs' exh. 1 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7033 APPLICATION for Barry Stroud for admission pro hac vice filed by deft Adm. of Corrections (filing fee not paid) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 288 of 513

01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999 01/19/1999
01/20/1999 01/20/1999 01/20/1999
01/20/1999
01/20/1999 01/20/1999 01/20/1999 01/21/1999 01/21/1999 01/21/1999
01/21/1999 01/22/1999 01/22/1999
01/25/1999 01/25/1999
01/25/1999

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7033, Granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7013, Granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #6981, Granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #6983, Granted as to reopening the record only at this time ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7014, Granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7034 ORDER approving Vincent Nathan's statement and directing the Clerk to transfer the amt of $85,911.59 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7035 TRANSCRIPT filed of 1st day of hrg on Vincent Nathan's report − morning session − held on 1/19/99 (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7036 TRANSCRIPT filed of P.M. session held on 1/19/99 (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7037 ORDER approving the statement by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. and directing the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $29,247.25 from fine funds under the court's control ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7038 Minute entry: Second day of hrg on comprehensive report held. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 9:15am. Pltfs' exhs. 3 and 10 admitted ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7041 COPY of Judgment entered in Civil Cases 76−350 and 76−543 dismissing the cases in part as to pltf Santos Diaz Perez (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7042 COPY of Judgment entered in Civil Case 78−2204, dismissing the case (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7043 COPY of judgment entered in Civil Case 81−1908 dismissing the case (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7039 TRANSCRIPT filed of 2nd day of hrg on Vincent Nathan's report − morning session − held on 1/20/99 (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7040 TRANSCRIPT filed of P.M. session held on 1/20/99 (mr) (Entered: 01/21/1999)
7044 Minute entry: Third day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for 1/25/99 at 1:00pm ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7045 SUBMISSION of reviewed financial statements by Vincent Nathan (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7046 MOTION in compliance with the Court's order of 12/17/92, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7047 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625.00 for services provided in Dec. 1998 in relation to the accounting month of Nov. 1998 (with invoice attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7024, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7048 INFORMATIVE memorandum concerning the admissibility of certain summary evidence, filed by Adm. of Corrections (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7049 Minute entry: Fourth day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is presented. Hrg continued for tomorrow, 1/26/99, at

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 289 of 513

01/25/1999 01/26/1999
01/26/1999 01/26/1999 01/26/1999 01/26/1999
01/27/1999
01/27/1999 01/27/1999
01/27/1999
01/27/1999 01/28/1999 01/28/1999 01/29/1999 01/29/1999 01/29/1999 02/01/1999 02/01/1999
02/01/1999 02/02/1999

9:00am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 02/09/1999 (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7050 TRANSCRIPT filed for 3rd day of hrg held on 1/21/99 (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7051 Minute entry: Fifth day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testiomny on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow, 1/27/99, at 9:00am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 02/09/1999 (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7052 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Vincent Nathan's report held on 1/25/99 (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7053 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for the plaintiff class by Alejandra Bird−Lopez (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7054 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for the plaintiff class by Jose R. Olmo−Rodriguez (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7055 AMENDED informative memorandum concerning the admissibility of certain summary evidence, filed by Adm. of Corrections (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7056 Minute entry: Sixth day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for 2/1/9/9 at 9:00 ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7057 CHECK # 1879499 in the amount of $ 29,247.25 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued. (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7058 RECOMMENDATION to extend funding for the Sistema de Educacion Universitaria Externa Program at the Adm. of Corrections penal institutions, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7058, The Clerk shall issue a check from the fine fund to cover the expenses of tuition of inmates at the SEDUE in the amt of $73,000. Payment is to be made directly to the university. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
7059 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 1/26/99 (mr) (Entered: 01/28/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7028, the stmt is approved for payment ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7028, Aproved for payment. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7046, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7045, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)
7060 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 1/27/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)
7061 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for the plaintiff class by Jose Olmo Rodriguez (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)
7062 Minute entry: Seventh day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 9:30am. Pltf's exhs. 16−19, 21, 22 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)
7063 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg on Vincent Nathan's report held on 1/27/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)
7064 Minute entry: Eighth day of hrg called on comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 2:00pm. Pltfs' exhs.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 290 of 513

02/02/1999 02/02/1999 02/02/1999 02/02/1999 02/03/1999 02/04/1999 02/04/1999 02/04/1999 02/04/1999 02/05/1999
02/05/1999 02/05/1999 02/05/1999 02/08/1999 02/08/1999 02/08/1999 02/08/1999
02/08/1999
02/09/1999

23, 24 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 02/16/1999 (Entered: 02/03/1999)

7065 MOTION SUBMITTING appendix 1 to exh. B of the Comprehensive Report of the expert witness (with attachment) filed by Vincent Nathan (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)

7066 CHECK # 2103541 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Coral & Co. issued. (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)

7067 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 2/1/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)

7068 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg on Vincent Nathan's report held on 2/2/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/03/1999)

7069 Minute entry: Case called for further hrg on Nathan's Report. Further testimony for pltf heard. Court adjourns until tomorrow at 10:30am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7070 Minute entry: Tenth day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testiomny on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7071 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg held on 2/3/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7072 TRANSCRIPT filed for 8th day of hrg (morning session) held on 2/2/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7073 TRANSCRIPT filed for 8th day of further hrg (afternoon session) held on 2/2/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7074 LETTER/MOTION by the Correctional Health Services Corp. req that a transfer be made to their account at Banco Santander in the amt of $1,784,900.84 which corresponds to the first trimester of the current 1999 year (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7074, Approved. The Clerk shall issue a check to the CHSC in the amt of $1,784,900.84 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7065, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7055, Noted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7075 TRANSCRIPT filed for 10th day of hrg (afternoon session) held on 2/4/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7076 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's Report held on 2/3/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/09/1999)

7077 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting svcs in the amt of $51,123.00 for the month of December 1998, filed by defendants (w/attachments) (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7078

ORDER for the Adm. of Corrections to verify the information provided as to the cases listed herein and inform the Court w/in 90 days its accuracy as well as any other detail which may assist the Court in determining whether this case should remain active or be otherwise dismissed (with list of cases attached). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7079 Minute entry: Case called for further hrg on Nathan's report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs. Court adjourns until 2/9/99 at 9:30am. Pltfs' exhs. 31, 32A−32D admitted.( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 02/23/1999 (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7080 Minute entry: 12th day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 9:00am. Pltfs' exhs. 14, 20, 33−37 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 291 of 513

02/09/1999 02/09/1999 02/09/1999 02/09/1999 02/10/1999 02/10/1999
02/10/1999 02/11/1999 02/11/1999 02/11/1999 02/11/1999 02/16/1999 02/18/1999
02/22/1999 02/22/1999 02/23/1999 02/24/1999
02/24/1999 02/24/1999

02/11/1999)

7081 CHECK # 2103540 in the amount of $ 73,000.00 payable to Metropolitan University issued. (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7082 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 2/8/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7083 TRANSCRIPT filed for 11th day of hrg on Nathan's report held on 2/8/99 (afternoon session) (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7083 OPPOSITION to deft's motion objecting to the admissibility of summary evidence, filed by plaintiffs (mr) (Entered: 05/25/1999)

7084 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 2/9/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7085 Minute entry: 13th day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony for pltfs presented. This concludes the presentation of the expert testimony. Parties met in chambers to discuss the next schedule for this case. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7086 CHECK # 2103555 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued. (mr) (Entered: 02/11/1999)

7087 CHECK # 2103552 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued. (mr) (Entered: 02/18/1999)

7088 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 2/10/99 (mr) (Entered: 02/18/1999)

7089 TRANSCRIPT filed for 12th day of hrg on Nathans' report held on 2/9/99 (afternoon session) (mr) (Entered: 02/18/1999)

7090 LETTER addressed to Zoe Laboy from inmates at the 448 Annex of the State Penitentiary, notifying violations and requesting her aid to solve some matters (with list of inmates attached) (mr) (Entered: 02/18/1999)

7091 MOTION regarding compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of 6/3/94 (with attachments), filed by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 02/18/1999)

7092 ORDER approving the statement and directing the Clerk of Court to issue a check in the amt of $51,123.00 from fine funds under the court's control to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/19/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7091, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/23/1999)

7093 ITEMIZED stmt of Vincent Nathan's time and expenses for the period of 1/1 − 1/31/99 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 02/23/1999)

7094 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 76−350(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated with the lead case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/24/1999)

7095

ORDER directing Vincent Nathan to pay all remaining fees and expenses he incurred in connection with his svcs as an expert witness and to make a final accounting of all fine funds under his supervision and control to the court on or before 6/30/99 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)

7096 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152, dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltf Luis Diaz Gonzalez. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)

7097 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152, dismissing the case as to pltf Alexis Melendez Diaz. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 292 of 513

02/24/1999 02/24/1999 02/24/1999 02/24/1999 02/24/1999 02/25/1999 02/25/1999 02/25/1999 02/25/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999 02/26/1999

7098 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 78−1698, dismissing the case as to pltf Hector Caraballo Rodriguez w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)
7099 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 78−249, dismissing the case as to Wilfredo Correa Suarez w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)
7100 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152, dismissing the case as to pltf Angel Figueroa Rivera w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)
7101 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152, dismissing the case as to pltf ivan Carrasquillo Castro w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)
7102 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152, dismissing the case as to pltf Wilfredo Jaiman Ramos w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 02/25/1999)
7103 ORDER for payment of custody fees to Banco Santander on acct. #50−0344−00 in the amt of $50.00 for the period of 2/1/98 − 1/31/99. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 02/25/1999 (Entered: 02/25/1999)
7104 ORDER for payment of custody fees to Banco Santander on acct. #50−0005−00 in the amt of $50.00 for the period of 2/1/98 − 1/31/99 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 02/25/1999 (Entered: 02/25/1999)
7105 CHECK # 2103593 in the amount of $ 51,123.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued. (mr) Modified on 02/26/1999 (Entered: 02/26/1999)
7106 ORDER annulling the sub−administrator communication as to the Medical Cadre Plan, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/01/1999)
7107 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Miguel Resto Ramos w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7108 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Alfredo Polo Martinez w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7109 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Miguel Vazquez Flores w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7110 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Alberto De Leon Hernandez w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7111 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Jesus Rodriguez Colon w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7112 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG) dismissing the case as to Jaime Robles Marrero w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7113 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Manuel Cruz Rosario w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7114 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Ramon Diaz Ortiz w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)
7115 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 77−1152(PG), dismissing the case as to Alejandro Perez De Jesus w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 293 of 513

03/01/1999 03/01/1999 03/02/1999 03/03/1999 03/03/1999 03/04/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999 03/05/1999
03/08/1999 03/08/1999 03/08/1999

7116 ORDER for the Clerk to transfer the amt of $139,773.48 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/04/1999)

7117 Minute entry: Meeting in chambers. The Court informed counsel that he will start a crim. jury trial this morning and that the continuation of the hrgs in this case will be tomorrow at 9:00am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/05/1999)

7118 Minute entry: 14th day of hrg on the comprehensive report called. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 9:30am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/05/1999)

7119 Minute entry: 15th day of hrg on the comprehensive report called. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow at 2:00pm ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/05/1999)

7120 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/2/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/05/1999)

7121 Minute entry: 16th day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for 3/15/99 at 9:00am. Pltfs' exh. 63 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7122 TRANSCRIPT filed for hrg held on 3/4/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7123 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 79−1708, dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltf William Villalobos Rivera, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7124 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 79−1707, dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltf Amalio Roman Vega, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7125 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 79−1706, dismissing the case w/o prejudice a sto pltf Jorge Cintron Ramon, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7126 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 79−1705 dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltf Luis Chacon Valentin, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7127 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 79−1673 dismissing the complaint w/o prejudice s to pltf Ramon Esteves Cesse, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7128 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 78−2138 dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltf Oscar Santana Martinez, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7129 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 79−1234 dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltf Roberto Natal Rosario, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7130

COPY of JUDGMENT entered in 79−1112 dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltfs Juan Cruz, Raul Gomez, Moises Vega, Eduardo Cruz, Andres Ventura, Marcos De Jesus, Rafael Figueroa, Jose Sostre, Jorge Morales, Luis Rodriguez, Neftali Rosario, William Rivera, Johnny Lopez, Jose Martinez, Juan Torres, and Ernesto Santiago, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/08/1999)

7131 ORDER for investment transactions with Merril Lynch, Inc., etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/09/1999)

7132 ORDER for investment transactions with Merril Lynch, Inc., etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/09/1999)

7133 ORDER for investment transactions with Merril Lynch, Inc., etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/09/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 294 of 513

03/08/1999 03/09/1999 03/09/1999 03/12/1999 03/15/1999
03/15/1999
03/15/1999 03/15/1999
03/16/1999 03/16/1999 03/16/1999 03/16/1999 03/16/1999
03/16/1999 03/16/1999
03/16/1999
03/17/1999

7134 CHECK # 2103618 in the amount of $ 3,021,582.25 payable to Merrill Lynch issued. (mr) (Entered: 03/09/1999)

7135 CHECK # 2103620 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman issued. (mr) (Entered: 03/10/1999)

7136 ITEMIZED statement of time and expenses for the period from 1/31 − 2/28/99, filed by Vincent Nathan (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 03/10/1999)

7137 MOTION in limine concerning mode and order of examination of witnesses filed by the pltf class (with memo in support attached) (mr) (Entered: 03/15/1999)

7138 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 for services provided in January 1999, in relation to the accounting month of December 1998. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/16/1999)

7139

Minute entry: Seventeenth day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Testimony presented on behalf of defts. Testimony on behalf of pltfs will resume tomorrow. Hrg continued for tomorrow at 9:30am. Pltfs' exh. 65 and defts' exhs. A, B admitted ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 03/16/1999 (Entered: 03/16/1999)

7140 UNOPPOSED renewed application for permission to employ a consultant in fire safety, filed by the Govt defendants (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 03/16/1999)

7141

ORDER granting defts' application for permission to employ a consultant in fire safety (dkt #7140). Defts shall retain Rolf Jensen and Assoc., Inc. as consultants and their svcs shall be compensated from the fine monies currently deposited with the Court, upon submission of the bills for the Court's approval ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/16/1999)

7142 CHECK # 2103619 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued. (mr) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

7143 Copy of Receipt # 99733 in the amount of $ 753.66 re: consigned check from Tata Travel, Inc. (mr) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

7144 Minute entry: Eighteenth day of hrg on comprehensive report. Further testimony of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for tomorrow, 3/17/99, at 9:00am. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7137, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

7145

ORDER (dated 2/8/99), for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $11,834.64 payable to Tata Travel to cover the cost of the airline tickets for the Board of Directors of the Correctional Health Svcs Corp. to visit several health care facilities in the Southeastern United States, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 04/01/1999 (Entered: 03/17/1999)

7146 ORDER for the Clerk to deposit the check received from Tata Travel for an adjustment of the plane fare in the amt of $753.66 in the fine funds under control of the Court ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

7147 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $2,986.16 to the Hon. Juan Perez−Gimenez for reimbursement of expenses incurred in the trip with the Correctional Health Svcs Corp., etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

7148 ORDER approving the statement of fees and expenses by Vincent Nathan for the period 1/31 − 2/28/99 and directing the Clerk to transfer the amt of $147,986.81 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation (re: dkt #7136) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/17/1999)

7149 CHECK # 2103638 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Coral & Co. issued. (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 295 of 513

03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/17/1999 03/18/1999 03/18/1999 03/18/1999 03/19/1999 03/19/1999 03/19/1999 03/23/1999

7150 MOTION to include Eluid Martin Montalvo, Raymond Rivera Rios, Hector Luis Serrano Labrador and Diana Ramirez Tousset as new class representatives, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7151 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/16/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7152 Minute entry: Nineteenth day of hrg called on comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. hrg is continued for tomorrow, 3/18/99, at 9:30am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7153 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 77−1152, dismissing the case w/o prejudice as to pltf Juan L. Gonzalez Alvarran. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7154 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1710, dismissing the case w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7155 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1712, dismissing the case w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7156 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1713, dismissing the case w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7157 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1714, dismissing the case w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7158 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1715, dismissing the complaint w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7159 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1716, dismissing the case w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7160 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1717, dismissing the case w/o prejudice. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/18/1999)
7161 Minute entry: Twentieth day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hrg is continued for Tuesday, 3/23/99, at 9:00am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/19/1999)
7162 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/15/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/19/1999)
7163 CHECK # 2103639 in the amount of $ 2,986.16 payable to Hon. Juan Perez Gimenez issued. (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)
7164 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 78−1912(PG) dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)
7165 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 79−1128, dismissing the case, etc., as stated herein. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)
7166 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 96−2180 dismissing the case, etc., as stated herein. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)
7167 Minute entry: Case called for further hrg on Nathan's report. Plf indicates that they have finished the presentation of their case in chief. Testimony for deft heard. Court adjourns until tomorrow at 9:30am ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 296 of 513

03/23/1999 03/23/1999 03/23/1999 03/23/1999 03/23/1999 03/24/1999 03/24/1999 03/25/1999 03/25/1999
03/29/1999 03/29/1999 03/29/1999 03/29/1999
03/30/1999 04/05/1999 04/05/1999 04/05/1999 04/05/1999 04/05/1999

7168 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civil No. 85−1370, dismissing the case, etc., as stated herein. This case is no longer consolidated therewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

7169 STIPULATION on the Rio Piedras Complex and other matters by the pltf class and deft Pedro Rossello, Enrique Vazquez Quintana and Jphnny Colon (dtd 6/8/93). (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

7170 MOTION for the Court to take Notice of certain order and other filed documents filed by the pltf class (with exhs. attached) (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

7171 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/3/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

7172 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/17/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

7173 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/23/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/25/1999)

7174 Minute entry: Case called for further hrg on Nathan's report. Further testiomny for deft heard. Court adjourns until tomorrow at 9:00am. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/26/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7150. Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/26/1999)

7175

Minute entry: Twenty−third day of hrg called on the comprehensive report. Further testimony on behalf of defts is presented. Parties rest. They are granted until 6/30/99 to submit simultaneous proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. By 8/2/99, they are to submit simultaneous proposed remedies. There remains one deposition to be taken. Parties will agree on a date and time, but it will be taken before June 30. It will be filed under seal. Defts may supplement the motion, filed by pltfs, which contains the Court's orders and stipulations. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 04/07/1999 (Entered: 03/30/1999)

7176 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/24/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/30/1999)

7177 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on Nathan's report held on 3/25/99 (mr) (Entered: 03/30/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7170, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/30/1999)

7178 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 for svcs provided in Feb. 1999 in relation to the accounting month of Jan. 1999 (with invoice attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 03/30/1999)

7179 MOTION SUBMITTING classification manual, filed by the pltf class (with 2 bound vols. attached) (mr) (Entered: 03/31/1999)

7180 MOTION in compliance with Court Order of 12/17/92, submitting the 37th progress report for the Rio Piedras Correctional Complex for the period from 12/16/98 − 2/15/99, filed by the govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/06/1999)

7181 MOTION regarding compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of 6/3/94, filed by the govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/06/1999)

7182 MOTION regarding final disposition of EBP funds and proposed order, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 04/06/1999)

7183 SUBMISSION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req leave to file reports in Spanish, filed by the govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/06/1999)

7184 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and request for leave to file in Spanish, filed by the govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/06/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 297 of 513

04/05/1999 04/08/1999 04/09/1999
04/09/1999 04/09/1999 04/09/1999 04/09/1999 04/09/1999
04/09/1999 04/12/1999
04/12/1999 04/13/1999 04/14/1999 04/14/1999 04/15/1999
04/15/1999 04/15/1999

7185 MOTION regarding compliance for the month of Jan. 1999 with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of 6/3/94, filed by the govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/06/1999)

7186 Informative Motion by the plaintiff class that during Atty Carlos Garcia's absence from 4/10 − 4/30/99, Atty Christopher Jenkins will act as lead counsel for pltfs. (mr) (Entered: 04/09/1999)

7187 MOTION for extension of time for a period of 30 days to review, opine, allege or object as to the contents of the classification manual and its translation into the Spanish language submitted to the Court by the pltf class through motion dated 3/30/99, filed by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 04/12/1999)

7188 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for professional consulting svcs provided to defts for the month of Nov. 1998 in the amt of $17,077.00 by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (w/attachment) (mr) (Entered: 04/12/1999)

7189 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for professional consulting svcs provided to defts for the month of Jan. 1999 in the amt of $36,054.74 by Curnyn COnsulting, Ltd. (w/attachment) (mr) (Entered: 04/12/1999)

7190 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of Jan., Feb., and March 1999 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/13/1999)

7191 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 84−1808(PG), dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated therewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/13/1999)

7192

ORDER for the Adm. of Corrections to verify the information provided as to the list of cases and inform w/in 60 days any other detail which may assist the Court in determining whether this case should remain active or be otherwise dismissed, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/13/1999)

7192 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for the govt defendants by Dennisse N. Longo−de−Morgan (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7193

ORDER approving report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing 3rd advancement of fine funds for the year starting 7/1/96. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $22,000.00 to the HCST as an advancement for expenses to be incurred during the months of April, May and June 1999. By 7/5/99, the staff of the HCST shall submit to the court an expense report detailing how the funds advanced have been used. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 04/16/1999 (Entered: 04/13/1999)

7194 MOTION SUBMITTING external audit report of the Civil Action and Education Corp. (w/attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/13/1999)

7195 ORDER for payment of svcs to Vila Del Corral & Co. in the amt of $2,250.00 for svcs provided in upgrading the accounting software used in this case ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/13/1999)

7196 MOTION by the Facilities Rehabilitation Program (FRP) Director introducing FRP quarterly report (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/15/1999)

7197 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for inmate vocational training project, by the govt defts, w/attachment (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7179, the Court approves the English and Spanish versions of the Classification Manual agreed to by the parties. Defts are to implement the same forthwith w/o delay. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: 7180, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7181, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 298 of 513

04/15/1999 04/15/1999 04/15/1999 04/15/1999 04/15/1999 04/15/1999
04/15/1999 04/15/1999 04/15/1999 04/16/1999 04/20/1999 04/20/1999 04/20/1999 04/21/1999 04/22/1999 04/26/1999 04/26/1999
04/26/1999
04/27/1999

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7183, Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7184, Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7185, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7194, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: 7192A, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7198 ORDER regarding final disposition of funds. Angelo Ravelo shall transfer to the Commonwealth of PR the $3.25 million bail fund provided the EBP by this Court, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7199 CHECK # 2103683 in the amount of $ 22,000.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7200 OPPOSITION to deft's motion for time to review classification manual, filed by the pltf class (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7201 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $36,054.74 from fine funds to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7202 REPORT in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of March 1999 and req for leave to file in Spanish, filed by the govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7203 MOTION SUBMITTING fire safety audits and corrective action plans for 1998 and req for leave to file them in Spanish filed by the govt defts (with 2 bound vols. attached) (mr) Modified on 04/27/1999 (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7204 CHECK # 2103685 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7205 COPY of ORDER entered in Civ. No. 99−1195(DRD), consolidating that case with Civ. No. 79−004(PG) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/21/1999)

7206 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for Rolf Jensen & Assoc., Inc. for consulting svcs provided in the amt of $18,046.57, covering the period ending 1/30/99, filed by govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 04/22/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7202, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/23/1999)

7207 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req for leave to file documents in Spanish, filed by the Govt defts (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 04/27/1999)

7208 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $17,077.00 from fine funds to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for svcs for the period of Nov. 1998 (re: #7188) ( signed Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 05/03/1999 (Entered: 04/27/1999)

7209

ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $360,000.00 from fine funds to the Instituto de Banca y Comercio for tuition and materials provided to inmates enrolled in vocational training programs being offerred by IBC at institutions of the AOC. (re: #7197) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 05/03/1999 (Entered: 04/27/1999)

7210 MOTION for leave to file motion under seal filed by the Govt defts (with sealed envelope attached) (mr) Modified on 04/28/1999 (Entered: 04/27/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 299 of 513

04/27/1999 04/27/1999 04/27/1999 04/27/1999 04/29/1999 04/29/1999 04/30/1999
04/30/1999
05/03/1999
05/04/1999 05/04/1999 05/05/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/11/1999 05/12/1999
05/13/1999
05/13/1999

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7200, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/28/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7187, Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/28/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7196, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/28/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7203, Noted and Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 04/28/1999)
7211 CHECK # 2103711 in the amount of $ 36,054.74 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (mr) (Entered: 04/30/1999)
7212 CHECK # 2103735 in the amount of $ 17,077.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (mr) (Entered: 04/30/1999)
7213 MOTION in compliance with Court Order of 12/17/92 and for leave to file document in Spanish (submitting 38th progress report for the Rio Piedras Correctional Complex for the period of 2/16/98 − 4/15/99), filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 05/04/1999)
7214 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP stipulation" of 6/3/94 (submitting report for the month of March 1999), filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 05/04/1999)
7213 MOTION submitting fire safety audits and corrective action plans for the period of July − December 1998 and request for leave to file them in Spanish (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 05/04/1999)
7216 CHECK # 2103684 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (mr) (Entered: 05/05/1999)
7217 CHECK # 2103748 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (mr) (Entered: 05/05/1999)
7218 OPPOSITION to the motion to file documents under seal, filed by the Govt defts (mr) (li). (Entered: 05/07/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7207, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/12/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7213, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/12/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7214, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/12/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7215, Noted and granted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/12/1999)
7219 ITEMIZED STATEMENT of time and expenses for the period from 3/1 − 3/31/99 filed by Vincent Nathan (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 05/12/1999)
7220 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $18,046.57 from fine funds to Rolf Jensen & Assoc., Inc. for expenses incurred during the period ending on 1/30/99 (re: dkt #7206) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/13/1999)
7221 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of March 1999 and req for leave to file documents in Spanish, filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 05/14/1999)
7222 MOTION in compliance with Court Order dtd 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce pilot project and for leave to file documents in Spanish (report covering the period of 10/1/98 − 3/31/99), filed by Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 05/14/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 300 of 513

05/14/1999 05/17/1999 05/17/1999 05/19/1999 05/19/1999
05/19/1999 05/19/1999 05/20/1999 05/20/1999 05/20/1999 05/21/1999 05/24/1999 05/24/1999
05/25/1999
05/25/1999 05/25/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999

7223 Copy of Receipt # 101163 in the amount of $ 110361.19 re: EBP Funds (mr) (Entered: 05/20/1999)
7224 CHECK # 2103749 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (mr) (Entered: 05/20/1999)
7225 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting svcs for the months of Feb. and March, 1999, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. in the amt of $54,345.50 (w/attachment) (mr) (Entered: 05/20/1999)
7226 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $54,345.50 from fine funds to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for svcs for the period of Feb. and March, 1999. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/20/1999)
7227 ORDER for the Clerk to pay invoice no. 10373 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila Del Corral & Co. for svcs provided in March 1999, in relation to the accounting months of Feb. 1999 (with invoice attached). ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7222, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/20/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7221, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/20/1999)
7228 MOTION SUBMITTING information as to 18 inmates and former inmates in compliance with Court Order of 4/8/99 (with attachments), filed by the Govt defts (mr) Modified on 05/25/1999 (Entered: 05/25/1999)
7229 MOTION SUBMITTING information as to 55 inmates and former inmates in compliance with Court Order of 2/5/99 (with attachments), filed by the Govt defts (mr) Modified on 05/25/1999 (Entered: 05/25/1999)
7230 ORDER for the Clerk to transfer the amt of $38,280.69 from fine funds to the Center for the Study of Law & Institutional Litigation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/25/1999)
7231 Copies of Receipts # 101293, 101295 − 101303 re: EBP advances (mr) (Entered: 05/25/1999)
7232 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of 6/3/94 and for leave to file document in Spanish (for the month of April 1999), filed by Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 05/25/1999)
7233 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the custodial and sociopenal staffing stipulation and for leave to file in Spanish (submission of staffing pattern for Building 1−B, Mayaguez Detention Center), filed by Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 05/25/1999)
7234 ORDER for the Clerk to pay invoice no. 10523 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila Del Corral & Co. for svcs provided in April 1999 in relation to the accounting month of March 1999 (with copy of invoice attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/25/1999)
7235 Copies of Receipts # 101344 − 101354 re: EBP advances (mr) (Entered: 05/26/1999)
7236 CHECK # 2103790 in the amount of $ 54,345.50 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7233, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7237 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−2500, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7238 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 78−295, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 301 of 513

05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/26/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999 05/28/1999

7239 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2069, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7240 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−378, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7241 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−380, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7242 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−418, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7243 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 93−1435, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7244 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 94−1936, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7245 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 95−1083, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7246 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−2286, dismissing the case. This case is no longer consolidated herewith. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 05/27/1999)
7247 CHECK # 2103791 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 05/28/1999)
7248 CHECK # 2103792 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Coral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 05/28/1999)
7249 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 81−138(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7250 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 91−1184(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7251 COPY of PARTIAL JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 76−543(PG), dismissing the case as to pltfs Mario Moreau and Aureo Morales ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7252 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2470(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7253 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2710 and 84−182(PG), dismissing the cases w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7254 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2874(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7255 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−256 and 80−269(PG), dismissing the cases w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7256 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−969(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7257 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 95−2535(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7258 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 94−1935, dismissing the complaint w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 302 of 513

06/01/1999 06/02/1999 06/02/1999 06/03/1999 06/03/1999 06/03/1999 06/04/1999
06/04/1999
06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/04/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999
06/07/1999 06/07/1999

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7232, Noted ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7259 CHECK # 2103802 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (mr) Modified on 06/09/1999 (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7260 CHECK # 2103778 in the amount of $ 18,046.57 payable to Rolf Jensen Assoc., Inc. issued (mr) Modified on 06/09/1999 (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7261 CHECK # 2103801 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (mr) Modified on 06/09/1999 (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7262 Copies of Receipts # 101510−101512 re: EBP advances (mr) Modified on 06/09/1999 (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7263 Copies of Receipts # 101514−101520 re: EBP advances (mr) Modified on 06/09/1999 (Entered: 06/04/1999)
7264 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−274(PG), dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez )(mr) Modified on 06/09/1999 (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7265 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 94−2696(PG) and 95−1412(PG) dismissing the cases w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7266 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 92−2139(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7267 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 83−1104(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7268 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 95−1395(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7269 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 81−428(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7270 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 85−1450(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7271 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 94−1947(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7272 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 90−1341(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7273 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−1861(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7274 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 93−2014(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7275 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2623(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7276 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−1720(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7277 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 94−2044(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7278 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 95−1033(PG) and 95−1849(PG) dismissing the cases w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7279 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2505(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7280 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2527(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 303 of 513

06/07/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999
06/07/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999
06/07/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999 06/07/1999
06/07/1999 06/08/1999
06/08/1999
06/09/1999
06/11/1999 06/11/1999
06/14/1999
06/17/1999 06/23/1999

7281 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 81−423(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7282 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 91−1185(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7283 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 92−1284(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7284 COPY of PARTIAL JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 94−1946(PG), dismissing the case as to pltfs Jaime Pedroza, Cecilio Figueroa and Samuel Sanchez w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7285 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 95−1408(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7286 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−417(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7287 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 82−1457(PG) and 83−3145(PG) dismissing the cases w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7288 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−1125(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7289 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 80−1860(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7290 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 83−3146(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7291 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−1719(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7292 LETTER requesting the transfer to their account if $1,535,903 corresponding to the second trimester of the current year 1999, by Rafael Ramirez−Gonzalez from CHSC (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7292. The req is approved ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7293 MOTION req that the Court direct the Secretary of Correction and Rehabilitation to comply with her obligation under the 4/15/99 order and to file the statement required by that order forthwith, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7294 Informative Motion regarding the progress of the Guayama FRP relication facility project and its impact of the overall progress of the FRP, filed by the Facilities Rehabilitation Program Director (with attachments). (mr) (Entered: 06/09/1999)
7295 PROPOSED BUDGET report by the Hogar Santisima Trinidad for fiscal year 1999−2000 submitted by Padre Pedro Gorena (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 06/10/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7294: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1999)
7296 MOTION in compliance w/Paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing for the month of June 1999 and req for leave to file in Spanish, by gov't defts w/attachs. (il) (Entered: 06/15/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7293: Granted. The Secretary shall comply forthwith but not later than 6/25/99 with this Court's order of 4/15/99. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 06/15/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7296, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/17/1999)
7297 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting svcs by Rolf Jensen & Assoc., Inc. (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 06/24/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 304 of 513

06/23/1999 06/23/1999 06/25/1999 06/25/1999 06/25/1999
06/25/1999 06/25/1999 06/28/1999 06/28/1999 06/29/1999
06/29/1999 06/29/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 06/30/1999 07/01/1999

7298 MOTION for authorization to hire a consultant to the Adm. of Corrections to be paid by the Court from fine funds, filed by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 06/24/1999)
7299 MOTION SUBMITTING fire safety audits and corrective action plans for the period of Jan. 1999 through June 1999 and req for leave to file them in Spanish, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 06/24/1999)
7300 MOTION in compliance with Court Order of 6/14/99 (regarding the transfer of the functions of the EBP to the Pretrial Svcs Office), filed by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 06/28/1999)
7301 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of 6/3/94, submitting report for the month of May 1999, filed by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 06/28/1999)
7302 MOTION in compliance with Court Order of 12/17/92, submitting 39th progress report for the Rio Piedras Correctional Complex for the period of 4/16/98 through 6/15/99, and for leave to file documents in Spanish, filed by Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 06/28/1999)
7303 MOTION requesting notification of all order, filed by Atty Rick Nemcik on behalf of the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 06/28/1999)
7304 MOTION by Daliah Lugo Auffant to w/draw as attorney for the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 06/28/1999)
7305 JOINT motion requesting brief extension until 7/2/99 to file proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law, filed by the Pltf class (mr) (Entered: 06/29/1999)
7307 MOTION for payment of FUTA owed by the EBP in the amt of $32.74, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 06/30/1999)
7306 ORDER for the AOC to provide information as to the cases listed herein, w/in 30 days, to assist the Court in determining whether these cases should remain active or be dismissed. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/29/1999)
7308 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $101,942.12 from fine funds to Rolf Jensen & Assoc., Inc. (re: #7297) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/30/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7299, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 06/30/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7304, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7303, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7302, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7305, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7301, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/01/1999)
7309 ORDER for payment of svcs to Vila Del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 for the accounting month of April 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/01/1999)
7310 ORDER approving retention of Nancy Boneta as a consultant to the AOC (re: #7298) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [7307−1] motion for payment of FUTA owed by expedited bail project ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (su) (Entered: 07/02/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 305 of 513

07/01/1999 07/02/1999 07/02/1999 07/02/1999 07/02/1999 07/06/1999 07/06/1999 07/06/1999 07/06/1999 07/06/1999 07/07/1999 07/07/1999
07/09/1999 07/09/1999 07/09/1999 07/09/1999 07/13/1999
07/15/1999 07/15/1999 07/15/1999

7311 Informative Motion by the govt defts re: the AOC's progress of the Guayama relocation project (with attachments). (mr) Modified on 07/09/1999 (Entered: 07/06/1999)
7312 PROPOSED findings of fact and conclusions of law submitted by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 07/06/1999)
7313 CHECK # 2103859 in the amount of $ 2,250.00 payable to Vila Del Corral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 07/06/1999)
7314 Copy of Receipt # 102127 in the amount of $ 11.24 re: EBP Funds (mr) (Entered: 07/06/1999)
7315 PLAINTIFF'S proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding hrg on expert witness's comprehensive report (mr) (Entered: 07/06/1999)
7316 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of April, May and June 1999 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 07/06/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7300, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/07/1999)
7317 MOTION to request an order for disbursement of funds to finan the Civil Action and Education Corporation, filed by the President of the CAEC (mr) (Entered: 07/08/1999)
7318 FINAL itemized statement of Vincent Nathan's time and expenses for the period of April 1 through June 30, 1999 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 07/08/1999)
7319 SUBMISSION of final accounting by expert witness, filed by Vincent Nathan (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 07/08/1999)
7320 Copy of Receipt # 102189 in the amount of $ 388,256.07 re: consigned funds by Nathan and Roberts (mr) (Entered: 07/08/1999)
7321 ORDER approving the report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing a third advancement of fine funds for the year starting July 1, 1996 in the amt of $27,000.00 (re: dkt #7316) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/09/1999)
7322 CHECK # 2103877 in the amount of $ 27,000.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (mr) (Entered: 07/13/1999)
7323 CHECK # 2103870 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (mr) (Entered: 07/13/1999)
7324 MOTION in compliance with Court order of 6/29/99 (with report on status of pltfs attached) (mr) (Entered: 07/13/1999)
7325 MOTION submitting environmental audits, corrective action plans and req for leave to file them in Spanish, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 07/13/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7317. The budget for fiscal year 1999−2000 is approved. The Clerk shall issue a check payable to the Corp. (CAEC) in the amt of $1,739,895.30 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 07/14/1999)
7326 Copy of Receipt # 102516 in the amount of $ 264.44 re: Fed. Int. Chemical Vs. Adolfo Dask (mr) (Entered: 07/16/1999)
7327 SECOND Informative Motion by the FRP Director regarding the progress of the Guayama FRP Relocation Facility Project and its impact on the overall progress of the FRP (with attachments). (mr) (Entered: 07/16/1999)
7328 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of June 1999 and req for leave to file documents in Spanish, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 07/16/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 306 of 513

07/16/1999 07/16/1999 07/16/1999 07/16/1999 07/16/1999 07/16/1999 07/19/1999 07/21/1999 07/28/1999 08/02/1999
08/02/1999 08/02/1999 08/02/1999 08/03/1999 08/04/1999
08/04/1999 08/04/1999 08/04/1999
08/04/1999 08/04/1999

7329 MOTION by FRP Director introducing FRP Quarterly Report for April 1st − June 30, 1999. (il) (Entered: 07/19/1999)

7330 MOTION regarding discovery in FRP matter by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 07/19/1999)

7331 MOTION to set dte for presenting additional documentation on admission cells, detention cells and holding pens, by pltf class. (il) (Entered: 07/19/1999)

7332 MOTION to ext time until 8/16/99 to respond to defts mot req order for disbursement of funds to finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation by gov't defts. (il) (Entered: 07/19/1999)

7333 CHECK # 2103895 in the amount of $ 1,739,895.30 payable to Civil Action issued (il) (Entered: 07/19/1999)

7334 CHECK # 2103869 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (il) (Entered: 07/19/1999)

7335 CHECK # 2103861 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Corral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 07/20/1999)

7336 MOTION req leave to withdraw as pltfs counsel by Atty Maria Maldonado. (il) (Entered: 07/22/1999)

7337 JOINT motion regarding corrections to the transcript of the recent hrgs that began on 1/19/99, filed by pltfs and with the authorization of defts' counsel (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 07/29/1999)

7338 MOTION in compliance with Court order dtd 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce pilot project and for leave to file documents in Spanish (Report covering the period of 4/1/98 − 7/1/99), filed by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 08/03/1999)

7339 PROPOSED remedy submitted in the matter of the hrg on the Comprehensive Report of the Court's expert witness, Vincent Nathan, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 08/03/1999)

7340 Copy of Receipt # 102804 in the amount of $ 4,097.93 re: EBP Funds (mr) (Entered: 08/03/1999)

7341 MOTION to propose the development of a remedy, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 08/03/1999)

7342 Copy of Receipt # 102834 in the amount of $ 1.98 re: EBP Funds (mr) (Entered: 08/04/1999)

7343 LETTER requesting that the Court direct the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $163,844.00 payable to the Secr. of the Treasury of PR to initiate the process of the implementation of the Zarzal Drug Program, filed by the Correctional Health Services Program (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7343, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7318, Approved for payment. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

7344

ORDER directing the transfer of fine monies to support the Institute of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the Univ. of Puerto Rico in the amt of $577,249.25. The UPR shall issue and file a report of the Institute's activities as well as an accounting for the funds transferred by the Court no later than 8/30/00 (with copy of the proposal attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 08/13/1999 (Entered: 08/05/1999)

7345 ORDER to assign correctional officers to the Medical Cadre (with list of names and transfer institutions) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7337, the corrections are approved. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 307 of 513

08/04/1999 08/04/1999
08/04/1999 08/04/1999 08/04/1999 08/04/1999 08/04/1999
08/04/1999 08/04/1999
08/05/1999 08/06/1999 08/09/1999 08/09/1999 08/09/1999 08/11/1999 08/11/1999 08/12/1999 08/12/1999 08/18/1999 08/18/1999
08/20/1999 08/20/1999

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7327, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7325, Noted as to the audits, granted as to req for leave to file docs. in Spanish ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7336, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7328, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7332, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7331, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7330, Granted. The Court urges pltfs to move swiftly as it appears that the whole FRP system is about to break down ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7329, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7338, Noted as to the report and granted and to the req to file docs. in Spanish ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/05/1999)
7346 CHECK # 2103860 in the amount of $ 101,942.12 payable to Rolf Jensen and Assoc. issued (mr) (Entered: 08/06/1999)
7347 NINTH Report of the External University Education System pursuant to the Court's Order of 1/18/94 (mr) (Entered: 08/11/1999)
7348 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 78−1286(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/11/1999)
7349 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 86−827(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/11/1999)
7350 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Civ. 79−2514(PG) dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/11/1999)
7351 CHECK # 2103933 in the amount of $577,249.25 payable to University of PR for the Inst. of Correction and Rehabilitation Project issued (mr) (Entered: 08/12/1999)
7352 CHECK # 2103931 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (mr) (Entered: 08/12/1999)
7353 CHECK # 2103934 in the amount of $ 163,844.00 payable to Secr. of the Treasury of PR, Zarzal Drug Program, issued (mr) (Entered: 08/13/1999)
7354 Copy of Receipt # 102991 in the amount of $ 95.39 re: registry for interest (mr) (Entered: 08/13/1999)
7355 Copy of Receipt # 103088 in the amount of $ 382.31 re: interest on bail funds (mr) (Entered: 08/19/1999)
7356 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of July 1999 and req for leave to file docs. in Spanish, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 08/19/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7356, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/23/1999)
7357 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 78−1797 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 308 of 513

08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999 08/20/1999
08/20/1999
08/24/1999
08/26/1999 08/26/1999 08/26/1999 08/30/1999

7358 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 81−788 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7359 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 76−543 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7360 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 95−2351 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7361 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 95−2181 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7362 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 94−1946 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7363 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 94−1535 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7364 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 93−2387 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7365 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 79−688 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7366 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 93−2155 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7367 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 92−1749 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7368 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 92−1044 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7369 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 88−548 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7370 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 80−420 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7371 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 79−1709 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7372 COPY of JUDGMENT entered in Case no. 79−1025 dismissing the case w/o prejudice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7373 ORDER for the Clerk to pay invoice no. 11076 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila del Corral & Co. for svcs provided in July 1999 in relation to accounting month of June 1999 (with invoice attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7374 ORDER for the Clerk to pay invoice no. 11075 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila del Corral & Co. for svcs provided in June 1999 in relation to the accounting month of May 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7375 MOTION for protective order terminating pltfs' discovery on the status of the RFP on the grounds of mootness, burdensomeness and overbreadth, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 08/26/1999)
7376 CHECKS #2103954 and #2103955, each in the amount of $1,625.00, payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 08/30/1999)
7377 CHECK # 2103953 in the amount of $ 1,499,893.89 payable to Merrill Lynch issued (mr) (Entered: 08/30/1999)
7378 OPPOSITION to defts' motion for protective order to terminate FRP discovery, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 08/30/1999)
7379 ORDER for investment transactions with Merrill Lynch, Inc., etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/31/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 309 of 513

08/30/1999 09/01/1999 09/07/1999 09/09/1999 09/09/1999 09/15/1999 09/15/1999 09/17/1999 09/17/1999 09/17/1999 09/17/1999 09/21/1999 09/21/1999 09/23/1999 09/27/1999 09/28/1999 10/05/1999 10/06/1999 10/07/1999 10/07/1999

7380 ORDER for investment transactions with Merrill Lynch, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 08/31/1999)
7380 MOTION to intervene and requested default hearing filed by Luis E. Romero−Rivera, Eli Samual Concepcion Maestre and Alexis Diaz Torres, pro−se and in Spanish (mr) (Entered: 11/15/1999)
7381 CHECK # 2103967 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (mr) (Entered: 09/08/1999)
7382 CHECKS # 2103966 and 2103930 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 each, payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (mr) (Entered: 09/09/1999)
7383 STIPULATION regarding submission of further evidence in admission cell hrg, filed by the pltfs and the equitable defts (with 2 bound vols. attached) (mr) (Entered: 09/10/1999)
7384 MOTION for urgent relief for inmates confined at the Bayamon Correctional Complex, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 09/15/1999)
7385 MOTION SUBMITTING exhs. to recent motion regarding Bayamon Complex, filed by the pltf class (w/attachments) (mr) (Entered: 09/16/1999)
7386 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting svcs provided by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the months of April, May and June 1999, filed by defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 09/17/1999)
7387 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $94,585.75 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for expenditues from April, May and June 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 09/17/1999)
7388 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for professional svcs provided for the month of July 1999 by Nancy I. Boneta Lopez in the amt of $7,500.00 (w/attachments) (mr) (Entered: 09/17/1999)
7389 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $7,500.00 to Nancy Boneta Lopez for expenditures from July 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 09/17/1999)
7390 CHECK # 2104005 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy Boneta Lopez issued (mr) (Entered: 09/21/1999)
7391 CHECK # 2104006 in the amount of $ 94,585.75 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (mr) (Entered: 09/21/1999)
7392 MOTION for a 30 day extension of time w/in which to file their opposition to the motion for urgent relief for inmates confined at the Bayamon Correctional Complex, filed by the govt defts (mr) (Entered: 09/24/1999)
7393 OPPOSITION to defts' motion for an extension of 30 days to respond to pltfs' motion on the Bayamon Complex, filed by the pltf class (mr) (Entered: 09/28/1999)
7394 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of August 1999 and req for leave to file in Spanish, filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 09/28/1999)
7395 ORDER denying motion for ext. of time (dkt #7392), granting response in opposition (dkt #7393) and motion in compliance (dkt #7394) is noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/05/1999)
7396 CHECK # 2104036 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman issued (mr) (Entered: 10/07/1999)
7397 CHECK # 2104035 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (mr) (Entered: 10/07/1999)
7398 MOTION requesting payment of Instituto de Banca y Comercio for vocational training programs, filed by defts (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 310 of 513

10/07/1999 10/08/1999 10/15/1999 10/19/1999 10/19/1999 10/22/1999
10/22/1999 10/26/1999 10/26/1999 10/26/1999
10/26/1999
10/26/1999
10/27/1999 10/27/1999 11/03/1999
11/03/1999 11/03/1999 11/03/1999

7399 DESIGNATION of alternate lead counsel Christopher Jenkins from 10/8 − 10/19/99 filed by Atty Carlos Garcia−Gutierrez (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1999)
7400 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $345,000.00 from fine funds to PROCEDEN for vocational training provided to inmates ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/08/1999)
7401 MOTION SUBMITTING Quarterly FRP Report w/attachment by Ramon Mellado (il) (Entered: 10/18/1999)
7402 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of July, August and September 1999 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 10/19/1999)
7403 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $345,000.00 from fine funds to PROCEDEN, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/19/1999)
7404 ORDER approving the Report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds for the year starting 7/1/96. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $25,000.00, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/22/1999)
7405 CHECK # 2104087 in the amount of $ 345,000.00 payable to PROCEDEN issued (mr) (Entered: 10/22/1999)
7406 CHECK # 2104089 in the amount of $ 25,000.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1999)
7407 ORDER for investments to be executed by Banco Santander and to be deposited in acct. no. 501−00001−7 at Banco Santander ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1999)
7408 ORDER for the Clerk to pay invoice 11314 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila del Corral & Co. for services provided in Aug. 1999 in relation to the accounting month of July 1999 (with invoice attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1999)
7409 ORDER for the Clerk to pay invoice no. 11452 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila del Corral & Co. for services provided in Sept. 1999 in relation to the accounting month of August 1999 (with invoice attached) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1999)
7410 PLAINTIFFS' recommention to extend funding for the Sistema de Educacion Externa (SEDUE) Program at the Adm. of Correction penal institutions and CCA private institutions at Guayama and Ponce i(with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1999)
7411 CHECK # 2104094 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1999)
7412 CHECK # 2104093 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 10/27/1999)
7413 MOTION in compliance with Court Order dtd 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce pilot project and for leave to file documents in Spanish (report covering the period of 7/1/99 thru 9/31/99) − with attachments (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1999)
7414 MOTION submitting fire safety audits and corrective action plans for the period of April 1999 thru Sept. 1999 and req for leave to file them in Spanish (with 2 bound vols. attached) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1999)
7415 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of Sept. 1999 and req for leave to file them in Spanish (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1999)
7416 MOTION submitting environmental audits and corrective action plans with req for leave to file them in Spanish (with 2 bound vols. attached) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 311 of 513

11/04/1999 11/10/1999
11/10/1999 11/12/1999 11/12/1999
11/15/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999 11/18/1999
11/22/1999
11/22/1999
11/30/1999 11/30/1999

7417 ORDER to assign correctional officers to the Medical Cadre, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/04/1999)
7418 ORDER directing transfer of Medical Cadre budget funds for the year 2000 to the Secretary of the Treasury of PR in the amt of $1,708,176.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/10/1999)
7419 MOTION by Atty Elfrick Mendez to withdraw from this case (mr) (Entered: 11/10/1999)
7420 CHECK # 2104107 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (mr) (Entered: 11/15/1999)
7421 EMERGENCY verified motion for stay of order to assign correctional officers to the Medical Cadre and for reconsideration of the order, filed by the Govt defts (mr) (Entered: 11/15/1999)
7422 ORDER re: dkt #7419, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/15/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7416: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/18/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7415: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/18/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7414: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/18/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7398: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/18/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7413: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/18/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt # 7401: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/18/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7399: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 11/18/1999)
7423 CHECK # 2104148 in the amount of $ 1,708,176.00 payable to Secretary of the Treasury (Medical CADRE) issued (mr) (Entered: 11/22/1999)
7424 MOTION requesting copy of the "Classification of the Inmates' Manual" filed by Felix Espinosa Babilonia (pro−se and in Spanish) (mr) (Entered: 11/22/1999)
7425 CHECK # 2104108 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (mr) (Entered: 11/22/1999)
7426 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting svcs provided by Nancy Boneta for the month of August, 1999, filed by defts (wih attachments) (mr) (Entered: 11/22/1999)
7427 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting svcs provided by Nancy Boneta for the month of September 1999, filed by defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 11/22/1999)
7428 NOTICE of removal, motion for extension of time to file the notice, motion for leave to file documents in Spanish, and motion for consolidation with 79−004 filed by the govt defts (with attachments) − re: Civ. No. 99−1195(PG) (mr) (Entered: 11/22/1999)
7429 ORDER denying the emergency verified motion for stay of the Court's order of Nov. 2 (dkt #7421) and the request for reconsideration of said order, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 11/24/1999)
7430 LETTER by the CHSC informing that the estimated budget for the third trimester of the current 1999 year is $3,449,455.75 (mr) (Entered: 11/30/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7430, Granted. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,449,445.75 to the CHSC ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 312 of 513

11/30/1999 12/01/1999 12/01/1999 12/01/1999
12/01/1999
12/01/1999
12/02/1999
12/02/1999
12/02/1999
12/02/1999
12/03/1999 12/03/1999 12/03/1999 12/06/1999 12/06/1999 12/06/1999 12/09/1999
12/10/1999 12/10/1999 12/13/1999

(Entered: 11/30/1999)
7431 CHECK # 2104172 in the amount of $ 3,449,455.75 payable to CHSC issued (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7347, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7311, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1999)
7432 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $7,500 to Nancy Boneta for svcs for the period of August 1999, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1999)
7433 ORDER for the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $7,500 to Nancy Boneta for svcs for the period of September 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/01/1999)
7434 MOTION requesting interpretation of Court order to clarify and specify the faculties and powers of the position of the FRP Director and to recognize absolute immunity to this position (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/02/1999)
7435 ORDER for payment of expenditures to Vincent Nathan in the amt of $30,107.24 for the period of April 1 thru June 30, 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) Modified on 12/15/1999 (Entered: 12/02/1999)
7436 ORDER re: #7319, approved, #7410 is granted and #7428 is granted as to the consolidation and the extension of time. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/02/1999)
7437 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of 6/3/94, submitting report for the month of June 1999 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/03/1999)
7438 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of Oct. 1999 and req for leave to file documents in Spanish (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/03/1999)
7439 CHECK # 2104176 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman issued (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1999)
7440 CHECK # 2104177 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy Boneta issued (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1999)
7441 CHECK # 2104178 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy Boneta issued (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1999)
7442 CHECK # 2104175 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (mr) (Entered: 12/07/1999)
7443 MOTION requesting order to file Notice of Removal erroneously filed under Civil No. 99−1195(PG) nunc pro tunc as of 11/22/99 (mr) (Entered: 12/08/1999)
7445 ORDER re: #7443, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1999)
7444 ORDER for the Clerk to pay invoice no. 11548 in the amt of $1,625.00 to Vila del Corral & Co. for svcs provided in Oct. 1999 in relation to the accounting month of Sept. 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/09/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7435, that this order is hereby vacated. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1999)
7446 CHECK # 2104200 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Coral & Co. issued (mr) (Entered: 12/10/1999)
7447 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting svcs provided to defts for the months of July, August and Sept. 1999, filed by Curnyn COnsulting (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 12/14/1999)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 313 of 513

12/15/1999 12/15/1999 12/15/1999
12/17/1999 12/21/1999 12/22/1999
12/22/1999 12/23/1999 12/23/1999
12/29/1999
12/29/1999 12/29/1999 01/10/2000 01/10/2000
01/11/2000 01/11/2000 01/11/2000 01/11/2000 01/12/2000
01/12/2000 01/12/2000

ENDORSED ORDER re: #7437, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/15/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7438, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/15/1999)
7448 ORDER that the order entered on 12/1/99 (dkt #7435) authorizing the payment of $30,107.24 to Mr. Vincent Nathan is hereby vacated ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/15/1999)
7449 OPPOSITION to motion requesting interpretation of Court Order, filed by the pltf class (with amended certificate of svc attached) (mr) (Entered: 12/20/1999)
7450 Informative Motion that the govt defts will make all filings regarding Civil 99−2323(PG) in the lead case. (mr) (Entered: 12/22/1999)
7451 Informative Motion of the Govt Defts advising of status of remedial workplan adopted pursuant to proposed remedy submitted in August, 1999. (mr) (Entered: 12/23/1999)
7452 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting svcs provided during the month of October, 1999, by Nancy Boneta (with attachment) (mr) (Entered: 12/23/1999)
7453 ORDER to assign correctional officers to the Medical Cadre (with list of officers) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/23/1999)
7454 ORDER re: #7434, This motion is ordered stricken from this case and it should be filed in Civ. 99−1612. The req by co−deft Ramon Mellado for this Judge to interpret a Court Order is Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 12/23/1999)
7455 ORDER re: #7452 The Ct. approves the invoice sumbitted by Nancy Boneta. The final itemized statement shall be filed in the case, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 12/29/1999)
7456 DESIGNATION of Christopher A. Jenkins as ALTERNATE LEAD COUNSEL by Atty. Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (ct) (Entered: 12/30/1999)
7457 RESPONSE by All Plaintiffs to Govt's Informative Motion Advising of Status of Remedial Workplan Adopted (ct) (Entered: 12/30/1999)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [7452−1] motion submitting invoice for consulting service ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 01/10/2000)
7458 ORDER granting [7447−1] motion submitting invoice in the amount of $60,893.50 re: Curnyn Consulting. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 01/10/2000)
7459 ORDER re: #7456, mooting the designation of alternate counsel and as to #7457, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/11/2000)
7460 CHECK # 2309341 in the amount of $ 60,893.50 payable to Curnyn Consultin, Ltd. issued (mr) (Entered: 01/12/2000)
7461 CHECK # 2309327 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy Boneta issued (mr) (Entered: 01/12/2000)
7462 CHECK # 2309337 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman issued (mr) (Entered: 01/12/2000)
7463 ORDER vacating the order entered on 1/7/00 re: #7452, approving payment for an invoice in the amt of $7,500.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/12/2000)
7464 ORDER re: #7451, Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/12/2000)
7465 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of October, November, December 1999 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/12/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 314 of 513

01/12/2000 01/12/2000 01/14/2000
01/14/2000 01/14/2000 01/19/2000
01/19/2000 01/19/2000
01/19/2000
01/21/2000 01/24/2000 01/25/2000 01/25/2000 01/28/2000 01/28/2000 01/28/2000 01/28/2000

7466 CHECK # 2309336 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (mr) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

7467 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting service for the months of October, November and December 1999 in the amt of $62,285.00 filed by Curnyn COnsulting, Ltd. (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/13/2000)

7468

ORDER approving report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad (HCST) and authorizing advancement of fine funds for the years starting 7/1/96. It is ordered that the clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $25,000.00 to the HCST , Parroquia Asencion del Senor, as an advancement for the expenses to be incurred by HCST during the months of 1/2/3/4/2000, etc as stated herein. Re: dkt #7465, 6240, and 6283 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (su) (Entered: 01/14/2000)

7469 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of November 1999 and req for leave to file documents in Spanish (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/18/2000)

7470 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of June 3, 1994 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/18/2000)

7471 ORDER re: #7467, directing the Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $62,285.00 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for svcs during the period of October, November and December 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/19/2000)

7472 MOTION by the FRP Director introducing the FRP Quarterly Report for the period from October 1 to December 31, 1999 (with report attached) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/2000)

7473 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of December 1999 and req for leave to file documents in Spanish filed by the Govt defts (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/2000)

7474

MOTION in compliance with court order dated 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce pilot project and for leave to file documents in Spanish filed by the Govt defts − Report covering the period of October 1, 1999 through December 31, 1999 (with attachments) (mr) (Entered: 01/20/2000)

7475 ORDER re: #7469 and 7470, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/21/2000)

7476 Copy of Receipt # 106481 in the amount of $ 239.15 re: 20 checks (mr) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

7477 ORDER re: #7472 − 7474, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/25/2000)

7478 OPINION AND ORDER granting pltfs and defts until 3/1/00 to submit to the court proposals on the advisor's charge or scope of work, etc., as stated herein ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (cm). (Entered: 01/26/2000)

7479 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 for services provided in December 1999 in relation to accounting month of Nov. 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/2000)

7480 ORDER for payment of services to Vila Del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 for services provided in November 1999 in relation to the accounting month of Oct. 1999 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (mr) (Entered: 01/28/2000)

7481 MOTION by All Plaintiffs for leave to allow pltfs to photograph or videotape the institutions at the Bayamon complex on 24−hour notice. (ct) (Entered: 02/01/2000)

7482 MOTION SUBMITTING external audit report of the Civil Action and Education Corporation w/attachment by Atty. Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (ct) (Entered: 02/01/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 315 of 513

02/01/2000
02/01/2000 02/01/2000 02/02/2000 02/02/2000 02/02/2000 02/02/2000 02/07/2000
02/07/2000 02/08/2000 02/09/2000 02/10/2000 02/10/2000 02/14/2000 02/14/2000 02/15/2000 02/17/2000 02/18/2000 02/22/2000
02/22/2000

7483 ORDER for Payment of Custody Fees to Banco Santander in the amount of $150.00 for the periods of 9/1/1995 thru 9/1/1998. These amounts are to cover the difference between the yearly amount incorrectly invoiced by Santander, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/01/2000)
7484 MINUTES of Setting: Setting a hearing on pltfs' motion for an emergency hearing anent the conditions in Bayamon for 2/23/00 at 9:30 before Judge Juan M. Perez Gimenez (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 02/02/2000)
7485 CHECKS # 2309386 and 2309387 both in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila De Corral & Co. issued (ct) (Entered: 02/02/2000)
7486 ORDER granting 7481 motion for leave to allow pltfs to photograph or videotape the institutions at the Bayamon Complex on 24−hrs. notice ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/02/2000)
7487 ORDER granting [7482−1] motion submitting external audit report of the Civil Action and Education Corp. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/02/2000)
7488 Motion by Pedro Rossello for Atty. Rick Nemick Cruz to withdraw as attorney. (ct) (Entered: 02/03/2000)
7489 CHECK # 2309371 in the amount of $ 62,285.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ct) (Entered: 02/03/2000)
7490 ORDER directing the transfer of operational budget funds (in the amount of $3,708,821.62) for the first trimester of the year 2000 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/07/2000)
7491 ORDER granting [7488−1] motion for Rick Nemick Cruz to withdraw as attorney. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/07/2000)
7492 CHECK # 2309391 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ct) (Entered: 02/09/2000)
7493 ORDER granting [7449−1] opposition to motion requesting interpretation of Court order ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/09/2000)
7494 MOTION by Gvt. dfts regarding compliance w/paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of June 3, 1994. (ct) (Entered: 02/11/2000)
7495 MOTION by Gvt. dfts in compliance w/order of 12/17/1992 and submitting 42nd progress report for the Rio Piedras Correctional Complex for the period of 10/16/99−12/15/99. (ct) (Entered: 02/11/2000)
7496 MOTION by pltfs to show cause why Mirla Rodriguez, Esq. and Madeline Ortiz should not be held in contempt and request for leave to file doc. in Spanish. (ct) (Entered: 02/15/2000)
7497 MOTION for sanctions by pltfs (ct) (Entered: 02/15/2000)
7498 Verified OPPOSITION of Gvt Dfts to Pltfs' Motion for sanctions (ct) (Entered: 02/16/2000)
7499 ORDER [7495−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/17/2000)
WRIT of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum issued. (14 writs) (ct) (Entered: 02/18/2000)
7500 OPPOSITION by Government Defendants to pltfs motion [7496−1] for order to show cause why Mirla Rodriguez, Esq. and Madeline Ortiz, Esq. should not be held in contempt and request for leave to file docs. in Spanish, and REQUEST of gvt. dfts for leave to file docs. in Spanish (ct) (Entered: 02/23/2000)
7501 MOTION by pltf class for Protective Order to halt and delay certain depositions of individual members of the pltf class (ct) (Entered: 02/23/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 316 of 513

02/22/2000 02/23/2000 02/23/2000 02/23/2000
02/24/2000
02/25/2000 02/25/2000 02/28/2000
02/28/2000 02/29/2000
03/01/2000
03/01/2000 03/02/2000
03/03/2000 03/03/2000 03/03/2000 03/06/2000

7502 Minute entry: Meeting in Chambers: granting motion [7501−1] for protective order filed by pltfs. The depositions may be taken on 2/26/00 at 9:00. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/23/2000)

7503 APPLICATION for Amicus Curiae Apearance by Luis E. Tirado Barreras (ct) (Entered: 02/23/2000)

7504 MOTION by Gvt. Dfts to dismiss the Bayamon Correctional Complex Hearing (ct) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

7505

Minute entry: Hearing called on the Bayamon Correctional Complex issue (dkt #7384). Gvt filed a motion [7504−1] to dismiss the hearing. Both motions are denied. Testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. The hearing is continued for 2/24/00 at 9:00 am. Pltfs' exhs. 60−72 admitted, except for 70(21) and 72(1). Dfts' exh. A. admitted.( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/24/2000)

7506 Minute entry: SECOND DAY of hrg on the Bayamon Correctional Complex issued, dkt #7384. Further testimony on behalf of plffs hrd. The hrg is cont for tomorrow at 10am. Plffs' exhs 37,38,39, 73−79, admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 02/28/2000)

7507 NOTICE in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing by government Defendants (np) (Entered: 02/28/2000)

7508 Minute entry: THIRD DAY of Hearing on the Bayamon Correctional Complex issue (dkt #7384). Testimony on behalf of pltfs is presented. The hearing is continued for 2/28/00 at 9:30. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/29/2000)

7509 Minute entry: FOURTH DAY of Hearing on the Bayamon Correctional Complex issue (dkt #7384). Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is presented. The hearing is continued for 2/29/00 at 9:30. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 02/29/2000)

7510 SUBMISSION of Gvt. Dfts in accordance w/Opinion and Order of Ct. entered on 1/25/00 (ct) (Entered: 02/29/2000)

7511

Minute entry: FIFTH DAY of hearing on the Bayamon Correctional Complex issue (dkt #7384). Further testimony on behalf of pltfs is presented. THe hearing is continued for 3/1/00 at 9:30. Pltfs' exhs. 12−29,31−36,40−44,53−56, 70(21),84−96,98−110,114, admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/01/2000)

7512

Minute entry: Sixth Day of Hearing on the Bayamon Correctional Complex issue (dkt #7384). Further testimony on behalf of pltfs heard. Testimony on behalf of dfts is presented. Hearing is continued for 3/2/00 at 9:30. Pltfs' exhs. 1−5,7−11,45−52, admitted. Dfts' exhs C, admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

7513 Pltfs' submission on proposed charged to the technical advisor. (ct) (Entered: 03/02/2000)

7514

Minute entry: Seventh day of hearing on the Bayamon Correctional Complex issue (dkt #7384). Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. The dfts offer the testimony of Ruben Torres Martinez as cumulative. The dfts rest their case. This matter stands submitted. Dfts' exhs. D,E,F,G,H,I,J,K, admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/03/2000)

7515 CHECK # 2309424 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font issued (ct) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

7516 CHECK # 2309392 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font, MD issued (ct) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

7517 MOTION in compliance w/paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing by Government Defendants (ct) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

7518 ORDER: [7507−1] motion in complaince w/paragraph 44 of the stipulation reegarding custodial and sociopenal staffing is Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/06/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 317 of 513

03/08/2000 03/09/2000 03/09/2000 03/10/2000 03/13/2000
03/14/2000 03/14/2000 03/14/2000 03/14/2000 03/15/2000 03/16/2000 03/17/2000
03/17/2000 03/20/2000 03/20/2000
03/20/2000
03/21/2000 03/21/2000
03/21/2000 03/23/2000 03/23/2000 03/28/2000

7519 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Defendant−All by Taraneh K. Ferdman (ct) (Entered: 03/09/2000)
7520 MOTION by all pltfs SUBMITTING further evidence on admission cell hearing w/attachment (ct) (Entered: 03/09/2000)
7521 MOTION by dfts SUBMITTING invoice for consulting service and requesting for leave to file doc. in Spanish w/attachment (ct) (Entered: 03/09/2000)
7522 WRITS of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum returned executed on 2/23/00 (13 writs) (ct) (Entered: 03/13/2000)
7523 INFORMATIVE MOTION of Gvt Dfts regarding compliance w/representations recited in their submission dated 2/22/00 and REQUEST for leave to file docs. in Spanish (ct) (Entered: 03/14/2000)
7524 ORDER for payment of custody fees to Banco Santander in the amount of $100.00, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/14/2000)
7525 ORDER for payment of custody fees to Banco Santander in the amount of $50.00, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/14/2000)
7526 ORDER granting [7521−1] motion submitting invoice for consulting service. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/14/2000)
7527 MOTION in compliance w/paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing (ct) (Entered: 03/15/2000)
7529 DESIGANTION of Christopher A. Jenkins as alternate lead counsel by pltfs. (ct) (Entered: 03/17/2000)
7528 CHECK # 2309444 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nacy T. Boneta issued (ct) (Entered: 03/17/2000)
7530 ORDER re: [7527−1] motion in compliance w/paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) Modified on 03/17/2000 (Entered: 03/17/2000)
7531 ORDER re: [7523−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) Modified on 03/17/2000 (Entered: 03/17/2000)
7532 MOTION by gvt. dfts in compliance w/paragraph 24 of the "FRP Stipulation" of June 3, 1994. (ct) (Entered: 03/21/2000)
7533 MOTION in compliance w/pragraph 56 of the stipulation re: custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of January 2000 and REQUEST for leave to file in Spanish by gvt dfts. (ct) (Entered: 03/21/2000)
7534 MOTION in compliance w/paragraph 56 of the Stipulation re: custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of Feb. 2000 and REQUEST for leave to file in Spanish by gvt dfts (ct) (Entered: 03/21/2000)
7535 ORDER granting [7520−1] motion to submit further evidence on admisison cell hearing ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/21/2000)
7536 ORDER approving [7517−1] motion in compliance w/paragraph 44 of the stipulation re: custodial and sociopenal staffing ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/21/2000)
7537 ORDER re: [7521−1] Noted and granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/21/2000)
7538 ORDER [7529−1] designation of alternate lead counsel Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/23/2000)
7539 INFORMATIVE MOTION of gvt dfts concerning consolidation of certain administrative functions at the departamental level (ct) (Entered: 03/27/2000)
7540 CHECK # 2309425 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ct) (Entered: 03/29/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 318 of 513

03/29/2000 03/30/2000 03/30/2000 03/30/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 03/31/2000 04/05/2000 04/06/2000
04/06/2000 04/06/2000 04/10/2000
04/10/2000 04/11/2000
04/11/2000
04/12/2000

7541 SUPPLEMENT to Gvt. Dfts' INFORMATIVE MOTION dated and filed on 3/13/00 (ct) (Entered: 03/30/2000)
7542 ORDER re: [7532−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/30/2000)
7543 ORDER re: [7533−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/30/2000)
7544 ORDER re: [7534−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/30/2000)
7545 ORDER re: [7539−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 03/31/2000)
7546 CHECK # 3309476 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Corral & Co. issued (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7547 CHECK # 2309475 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Corral & Co. issued (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7548 TRANSCRIPT filed for Further Hearing for the date of 2/23/00 (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7549 TRANSCRIPT filed for Further Hearing for the date of 2/25/00 (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7550 TRANSCRIPT filed for Fourth Day of Hearing for the date of 2/29/00 (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7551 TRANSCRIPT filed for Third Day of Hearing for the date of 2/28/00 (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7552 TRANSCRIPT filed for Fifth Day of Hearing for the date of 3/1/00 (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7553 TRANSCRIPT filed for Sixth Day of Hearing for the date of 3/2/00 (ct) (Entered: 04/03/2000)
7554 CHECK # 2309487 in the amount of $ 12,083.33 payable to Aida Guzman Font, MD issued (ct) (Entered: 04/06/2000)
7555 Report on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of January, February and March 2000. (ct) (Entered: 04/06/2000)
7556 MINUTES of Setting: setting Status Conference for 5:30 4/12/00 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 04/06/2000)
7557 MOTION SUBMITTING Curnyn Consulting's invoice in the amount of $75,039.00 for consulting services (ct) (Entered: 04/10/2000)
7558 ORDER approving [7555−1] report (for the months of January February and March 2000) of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing 3rd advancement of fine funds for the year starting July 1, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/10/2000)
7559 CHECK # 2309480 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ct) (Entered: 04/11/2000)
7560 ORDER granting [7541−1] supplement to gvt dfts' informative motion dated and filed on 3/13/00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/11/2000)
7561 MOTION IN COMPLIANCE W/ORDER dated 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce Pilot Project and FOR LEAVE TO FILE documents in Spanish (ct) (Entered: 04/12/2000)
7562 LETTER MOTION from the CHSC requesting the transfer of $3,993,851 for the second quarter of 2000. (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 319 of 513

04/12/2000 04/12/2000 04/12/2000 04/12/2000 04/12/2000 04/12/2000 04/12/2000 04/13/2000 04/14/2000 04/14/2000 04/17/2000 04/18/2000 04/19/2000
04/19/2000 04/19/2000 04/24/2000 04/24/2000 04/24/2000 04/24/2000 04/26/2000

7564 CHECK # 2309499 in the amount of $ 25,000.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima issued (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
7565 Copy of Receipt # 108164 in the amount of $ 119.82 re: Expedited Bail Project (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
7566 Copy of Receipt # 108163 in the amount of $ 136.17 re: expedited bail project (ct) Modified on 04/14/2000 (Entered: 04/14/2000)
7567 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting service for the month of January 2000 and REQUEST for leave to file docs. in Spanish by Nancy Boneta (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
7568 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting service for the month of February 2000 and REQUEST for leave to file docs. in Spanish by Nancy Boneta (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
7569 MOTION submitting invoice for consulting service for the month of December 1999 and REQUEST for leave to file docs. in Spanish by Nancy Boneta (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
Status Conference held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (ct) (Entered: 05/26/2000)
7570 ORDER granting [7557−1]. The Clerk shall issue a check as soon as there are sufficient funds available. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
7563 ORDER re: [7562−1] directing the Clerk to transfer the amount of $3,993,851.00 to Banco Santander to be disbursed to CHSC, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
ENDORSED ORDER denying [7503−1]. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/14/2000)
7571 ORDER re: [7561−1] Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/18/2000)
7572 MOTION by the FRP Director introducing FRP Quarterly Report for the period of 1/1/00−3/31/00. (ct) (Entered: 04/19/2000)
7573 ORDER stating that Dr. Ernesto Torres Arroyo, MD as Executive Director of the Correctional Health Program shall take all the necessary steps to enforce his line of authority, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/19/2000)
7574 ORDER TO ASSIGN CORRECTIONAL OFFICERS TO THE MEDICAL CADRE ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 04/19/2000)
7575 DESIGNATION of Christopher A. Jenkins, Esq. as alternate lead counsel. Atty. Carlos Garcia will be out of PR from 4/24/00−4/26/00. (ct) (Entered: 04/20/2000)
7576 MOTION in Spanish by Eddie Robledo, pro se for reconsideration of the order establishing that the inmates can't be in the Admissions Area for more than 24−hours. (ct) (Entered: 04/24/2000)
7577 PLAINTIFFS' PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACTS and conclusions of law re: Hearing Bayamon Complex (ct) (Entered: 04/25/2000)
7578 VERIFIED MOTION by dfts to terminate prospective relief relating to certain facilities and to terminate facilities from litigation (memo of law in support and attchs.) (ct) (Entered: 04/25/2000)
7579 PROPOSED FINDINGS OF FACT and conclusions of law submitted by the gvt dfts in the matter of the Bayamon Hearing (ct) (Entered: 04/25/2000)
7580 CHECK # 2309510 in the amount of $ 75,039.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting issued (ct) (Entered: 04/26/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 320 of 513

04/26/2000 04/27/2000 04/27/2000 04/27/2000 04/28/2000 05/01/2000 05/01/2000 05/01/2000 05/02/2000
05/02/2000 05/02/2000 05/02/2000 05/02/2000 05/03/2000 05/03/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000
05/04/2000

7581 MOTION by gvt dfts in compliance w/paragraph 56 of the Stipulation Re: Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing for the Month of March 2000 and MOTION for leave to file docs. in Spanish (ct) (Entered: 04/27/2000)
7582 MOTION by the Governement Dfts for leave to file motion under seal (ct) (Entered: 04/28/2000)
7584 MOTION SUBMITTING declaration of Randolph W. Tucker w/attchs. (ct) (Entered: 04/28/2000)
7585 INFROMATIVE MOTION by the Goverment Dfts re: salary differential to correction officers assigned to the Medical Cadre (ct) (Entered: 04/28/2000)
7586 Supplemental INFORMATIVE MOTION of the Government Dfts regarding declaration of Randolph Tucker (ct) (Entered: 05/01/2000)
7587 NOTICE OF APPEAL [7574−1] order assigning correctional officers to the medical cadre by All Defendants. FILING FEE $ PENDING Transcript Order Form furnished to appellant Appeal record due on 5/11/00 (ct) (Entered: 05/02/2000)
7588 MOTION by Government Dfts for urgent relief staying the order assigning correctional officers to the medical cadre and request for hearing. (ct) Modified on 05/02/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)
7589 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by the Government Dfts re: notice of appeal (ct) (Entered: 05/02/2000)
ENDORSED ORDER denying [7588−1] motion for urgent relief staying the assignment of correctional officers to the medical cadre and request for hearing ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) Modified on 05/02/2000 (Entered: 05/02/2000)
ENDORSED ORDER granting [7582−1] motion to file motion under seal by the Government Dfts ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 05/02/2000)
USCA appeal fees received FILING FEE $ 105.00 RECEIPT # 108522 (ct) (Entered: 05/03/2000)
7590 TRANSMITTAL letter from the District of Puerto Rico forwarding certified copy of docket sheet to USCA. (ct) (Entered: 05/03/2000)
7591 Copy of Receipt # 108540 in the amount of $ 2.66 re: for inter. on funds (ct) (Entered: 05/03/2000)
7592 Certified copy of Order from USCCA on 5/2/00 temporarily staying the order assigning correctional officers to the medical cadre. The DC is directed to hold a hrg on this matter. (ct) (Entered: 05/03/2000)
7593 CHECK # 2309529 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (np) (Entered: 05/04/2000)
7594 Minute entry: set Hearing on plffs' mot re: medical cadre for 9:00 5/10/00 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/04/2000)
7595 MOTION to file response to mot for partial stay of order under seal by pltf class (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)
7596 SEALED RESPONSE in opposition to motion for partial stay of order by pltf class (il). Modified on 10/1/2015 to add PDF (li). (Entered: 05/04/2000)
7597 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625. invoice # 12412 for the services provided in March and April, 2000 in relation to the accounting for February, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) Modified on 05/04/2000 (Entered: 05/04/2000)
7598 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Company in the amt of $1,625. invoice # 12411 for services provided in April, 2000 for accounting services during March, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 321 of 513

05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000
05/04/2000
05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/04/2000 05/08/2000 05/08/2000 05/09/2000
05/10/2000 05/15/2000 05/16/2000
05/16/2000 05/17/2000
05/17/2000 05/17/2000 05/17/2000

7599 ORDER regarding mot # 7586: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

7600 ORDER regarding mots # 7584 and 7585: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

7601 ORDER regarding mot #7539: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

7602 ORDER regarding mot # 7575: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

7603 ORDER regarding mot # 7572: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

7604 ORDER regarding mot # 7576: It is hereby ordered that thi document be expunged from the record of this case. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

7605 ORDER regarding mot # 7210: Denied. The proposed sealed mot shall be returned forthwith to the gov't defts. Pltfs and private deft shall forthwith return all copies of the proposed sealed mot to the gov't defts. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7210: Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt# 7218 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 05/04/2000)

7606 CHECKS # 2309545 and # 2309544 both in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila Del Corral & Co. issued (ct) Modified on 05/08/2000 (Entered: 05/08/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [7595−1] motion to seal document(s) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 05/08/2000)

7607 MOTION by the pltf class for extension of time until 6/15/00 to respond to dfts' motion for partial termination (ct) (Entered: 05/09/2000)

7608 STIPULATION regarding officers assigned to the Medical Cadre and JOINT MOTION requesting the assignment of $371,600 to AOC by all parties (ct) (Entered: 05/09/2000)

7609 ORDER re: #7581 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 05/10/2000)

7610 MOTION by pltf class concerning expedited discovery and REQUESTING leave to serve interrogatories in excess of 25 questions (ct) (Entered: 05/16/2000)

7611

ORDER re: [7608−1] stipulation and joint motion of the parties. The AOC will reassign 54 of the corrections officers ("academy"), who are listed in the 4/19/00 Medical Cadre Order, to non−Medical Cadre duties at the Bayamon Complex. The remainder of the officers listed in the 4/19/00 order shall remain a part of the Medical Cadre. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amount of $371,600, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 05/16/2000)

7612 Pltfs' OPPOSITION to motion for partial termination (ct) (Entered: 05/17/2000)

7613 MOTION by gvt. dfts in compliance w/paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of 4/00 and REQUEST for leave to file in Spanish (ct) (Entered: 05/18/2000)

7614 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice in the amount of $7,500 for the month of March 2000 by Nancy Boneta (ct) (Entered: 05/18/2000)

7615 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice in the amount of $7,500 for consulting service for the month of April 2000 by Nancy Boneta (ct) (Entered: 05/18/2000)

7616 NOTICE by gvt dfts of dismissal of "Motion for Urgent Releif and Request for Hearing" (ct) (Entered: 05/18/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 322 of 513

05/22/2000 05/22/2000 05/23/2000 05/23/2000 05/25/2000 06/07/2000
06/07/2000
06/07/2000
06/08/2000 06/09/2000 06/09/2000 06/09/2000 06/09/2000 06/09/2000 06/12/2000 06/16/2000 06/20/2000 06/21/2000 06/22/2000 06/22/2000 06/22/2000
06/26/2000

7617 ORDER stating that no further payments are to be made to Dr. Guzman after 4/30/00, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 05/22/2000)
7618 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy), issued as informal mandate, Re: [7587−1] appeal by Defendant−All dismissing the appeal (ct) (Entered: 05/23/2000)
7619 CHECK # 2309565 in the amount of $ 371,600.00 payable to Secretary of Treasury of PR issued (ct) (Entered: 05/24/2000)
7620 MOTION by gvt dfts for leave to file reply memorandum in support of their motion for partial termination (ct) (Entered: 05/24/2000)
7621 MINUTES of Setting: setting Status Conference for 9:00 5/31/00 before Judge Juan M. Perez Gimenez (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 05/26/2000)
7622 ORDER approving the statement of Nancy Boneta for the period of February 2000 and directing the Clerk to issue a check in the amount of $7,500.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/07/2000)
7623 ORDER approving the statement of Nancy Boneta for the period of January 2000 and directing the Clerk to issue a check in the amount of $7,500.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/07/2000)
7624 ORDER approving the statement of Nancy Boneta for the period of December 1999 and directing the Clerk to issue a check in the amount of $7,500.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/07/2000)
7625 DESIGNATION of Christopher Jenkins as alternate lead counsel by Atty. Carlos V. Garcia (ct) (Entered: 06/09/2000)
7626 CHECK # 2309604 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy Boneta issued (ct) (Entered: 06/12/2000)
7627 CHECK # 2309603 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy Boneta issued (ct) (Entered: 06/12/2000)
7628 CHECK # 2309602 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy Boneta issued (ct) (Entered: 06/12/2000)
7629 Pltfs' SUPPLEMENTAL OPPOSITION to dfts' motion to terminate (ct) (Entered: 06/12/2000)
7630 REPLY of dfts in support of motion for partial termination (ct) (Entered: 06/12/2000)
7631 CHECK # 2309601 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ct) (Entered: 06/13/2000)
7632 INFORMATIVE MOTION of Gvt Dfts concerning recommendation of technical advisor to the Ct. (ct) (Entered: 06/19/2000)
7633 MOTION concerning depositions to be taken by the pltfs class (ct) (Entered: 06/21/2000)
7634 MOTION to appoint MGT of America, Inc. as technical advisor to the Court, by All Plaintiffs (ct) (Entered: 06/22/2000)
7635 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Defendant−All by Venetia D. Bell (ct) (Entered: 06/23/2000)
7636 APPLICATION for admission Pro Hac Vice by Venetia D. Bell as to the Goverment Dfts. Pro Hac Vice Fee $ PENDING (ct) (Entered: 06/23/2000)
7637 MOTION in compliance w/paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of March 2000 and REQUEST for leave to file in Spanish by Gvt Dfts w/envelope attached (ct) (Entered: 06/23/2000)
7638 ORDER re: #7613 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 323 of 513

06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/26/2000 06/28/2000 06/30/2000 07/05/2000
07/07/2000
07/10/2000 07/10/2000 07/11/2000 07/13/2000 07/13/2000
07/13/2000 07/13/2000 07/18/2000

7639 ORDER re: #7610 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7640 ORDER re: #7625 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7641 ORDER re: #7607 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7642 ORDER re: #7612 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7643 ORDER re: #7629 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7644 ORDER re: #7630 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7645 ORDER re: #7632 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7646 ORDER granting [7616−1] ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
ENDORSED ORDER on #7513 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
ENDORSED ORDER re: #7510 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7647 ORDER re: #7620 Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 06/26/2000)
7648 MOTION to submit further evidence on admission cell hearing, w/attachments, by pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 06/29/2000)
7649 Proposed Budget for the Year 2000−2001, w/attach, by Hogar Santisima Trinidad. (ni) (Entered: 06/30/2000)
7650 MOTION to request an order for disbursement of funds to finance the civil action and education corporation, by atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (ni) (Entered: 07/06/2000)
7651 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of April, May and June, 2000, w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 07/11/2000)
7652 CHECK # 2309655 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued in substitution of check #2309601 of 6/8/00. (ni) (Entered: 07/12/2000)
7653 CHECK # 2309656 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued − Line funds July/2000. (ni) (Entered: 07/12/2000)
7654 OPPOSITION to motion to request an order for disbursement of funds to finance the Civil Action and Education Corp. (ni) (Entered: 07/12/2000)
7655 ORDER #7637 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 07/13/2000)
7656 ORDER APPROVING REPORT OF THE HOGAR CATOLICO SANTISIMA TRINIDAD re: #7651. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 07/13/2000)
7657 Copy of Receipt # 109908 in the amount of $ 122.81 re: interest paid. (ni) (Entered: 07/14/2000)
7658 Copy of Receipt # 109906 in the amount of $ 168.50 re: interest (ni) (Entered: 07/14/2000)
7659 COPY of JUDGMENT filed in civil action 99−1401 (PG) and stating that civil action 99−1401 (PG) is no longer consolidated w/this case, 79−4 (PG). ( signed by

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 324 of 513

07/18/2000 07/19/2000 07/24/2000
07/26/2000 07/28/2000 07/28/2000 08/01/2000 08/02/2000 08/04/2000 08/04/2000 08/04/2000 08/04/2000 08/04/2000 08/04/2000 08/11/2000 08/18/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000

Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (re) (Entered: 07/18/2000)

7660 MOTION SUBMITTING FRP Quarterly Report, w/attachment, by FRP Director. (kd) (Entered: 07/19/2000)

7662 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting service w/attachment by Defendant−All (re) (Entered: 07/25/2000)

7661

ORDER: It is ordered that the Ct. hereby appoints to the position of technical advisor MGT of America, Inc. Counsel for the pts. shall immediately notify MGT a copy of this Order. MGT will file w/the Ct. and serve on counsel as soon as possible a budget and time schedule for the preparation of the charge or scope of work to be done. Counsel will provide to MGT any documents requested by MGT. MGT will immediately designate a person to be liaison w/the Ct. and that person will communicate directly w/the Ct. as soon as designated, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (re) (Entered: 07/24/2000)

7663 Pltfs' MOTION for leave to file replt to opposition to motion for disbursement of funds to finance the Civil Action and Education Corp. (w/tendered reply) (ct) (Entered: 07/28/2000)

7664 INFORMATIVE motion regarding Supreme Court decision, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2000)

7665 CHECK # 2309671 in the amount of $ 25,000 payable to Hogar Catolica Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2000)

7666 Motion for leave to withdraw as counsel for pltf, by Christopher A. Jenkins. (ni) (Entered: 08/03/2000)

7667 Motion in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 08/03/2000)

7668 CHECK # 2309687 in the amount of $ 5,000.00 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ni) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

7669 Verified motion to strike motion for leave to reply to opp. to motion to req. an order for disb. of funds to finance the civil action and Education Corp., by Govt. defts. (ni) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

7670 Motion in compliance w/paragraph 24 of the FRP stip. of 6/3/94 ( Report for 3/2000) (ni) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

7671 MOTION SUBMITTING Report for April 2000, in compliance with paragraph 24 of the FRP Stipulation of 6/3/94, w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

7672 MOTION SUBMITTING Report from 4/1/00 thru 6/30/00 in compliance w/ order of 8/18/92 by Govt. defts. w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

7673 MOTION SUBMITTING Report of June 2000 in compliance w/paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req. for leave to file in spanish by Govt. defts. w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 08/08/2000)

7674 Motion for leave to file pltfs' motion for leave to reply time having lapsed, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 08/14/2000)

7675 Response to motion (dkt #7674) for leave to file pltfs' motion for leave to reply time having elapsed, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)

7676 ORDER [7673−1] miscellaneous Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)

7677 ORDER granting dkt #7674. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #7670. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #7671. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 325 of 513

08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000 08/21/2000
08/21/2000
08/21/2000
08/29/2000 08/29/2000
08/30/2000 08/31/2000 09/05/2000 09/07/2000 09/12/2000 09/13/2000

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #7672. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
ENDORSED ORDER denying dkt #7669. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7678 ORDER noting dkt #7633. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7679 ORDER mooting dkt #7634. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7680 ORDER noting dkt #7635. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7681 ORDER granting dkt #7636 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7682 ORDER noting dkt #7654. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7683 ORDER noting dkt #7660. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7684 ORDER noting dkt #7663. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7685 ORDER noting dkt #7664. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7686 ORDER granting dkt #7666 and noting dkt #7667. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7687 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. to pay Invoice # 12966 in the amt of $2,250.00 covering services provided in May, 2000 in relation to Acct of April, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) Modified on 08/21/2000 (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7688 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. to pay Invoice # 12967 in the amt of $1,625.00 covering services provided in June, 2000 in relation to Acct of May, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7689 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. to pay Invoice # 13078 in the amt of $1,625.00 covering services provided in July, 2000 in relation to Acct of June, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2000)
7690 Motion to enjoin diversion of FRP funds, by pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 08/30/2000)
7691 Notice of absence from PR from 8−29 to 9−3−00 by atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez and DESIGNATION of atty Jose E. Fernandez Sein as alternate lead counsel. (ni) (Entered: 08/30/2000)
7692 Motion to dismiss or for summary judgment as to defts named in their individual capacities, w/memo of law attached, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 08/31/2000)
7693 Motion in compliance with Paragraph 24 of the FRP stipulation of 6/3/94, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/06/2000)
7694 Joint Motion for reimbursement of certain expenses incurred by Mgt of America, by pltfs and govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/06/2000)
7695 OPPOSITION to pltfs' motion to enjoin diversionof FRP funds, w/declaration of Atty Manuel A. Quilichini attached, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/08/2000)
7696 ORDER granting dkt #7694. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/12/2000)
7702 CHECK # 2309787 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ni) (Entered: 09/19/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 326 of 513

09/14/2000
09/14/2000 09/14/2000
09/15/2000
09/18/2000 09/19/2000
09/19/2000
09/20/2000 09/21/2000 09/21/2000 09/21/2000 09/22/2000 09/29/2000
09/29/2000 09/29/2000 09/29/2000 09/29/2000 09/29/2000 09/29/2000 09/29/2000 09/29/2000

7697 OPPOSITION to motion of the govt defts to dismiss or for summary judgment as to defts named in their individual capacities, w/memo of law in support thereof, by pltf. (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2000)
7698 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 24 of the FRP stipulation of 6/3/94, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2000)
7699 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of August, 2000 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2000)
7700 INFORMATIVE motion and correction regarding the memo of law in support of the opp. to defts' mot. for dismissal or summary judgment, w/attach, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2000)
7701 MINUTES of Setting: set Status Conference for 5:00 10/3/00 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2000)
7703 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. Invoice No. 13187 in the amt of $2,000.00 for services provided in September, 2000 in relation to the acct month of July, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/19/2000)
7704 MOTION to submit external audit report of the Civil Action and Education Corporation for fiscal year 7/1/99 to 6/30/00, w/attach, by Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. (ni) (Entered: 09/20/2000)
7705 MOTION w/d legal representation by Dennise N. Longo de Morgan on behalf of govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/21/2000)
7706 APPLICATION for hearing under R. 12(d), by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/25/2000)
7707 MOTION for leave to file reply to opp to mot to dismiss, w/reply tendered, by govt defts. (ni) Modified on 09/25/2000 (Entered: 09/25/2000)
7708 STATEMENT of material facts as which there is no genuine issues, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/25/2000)
7709 INFORMATIVE motion re: filings of 9/21/00, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/25/2000)
7710 ORDER to disburse funds to the Civil Action and Education Corporation in the amt of 1,964,448. and deliver the check the Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez as President, etc., as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7711 ORDER re dkt# 7709: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7712 ORDER re dkt# 7706: Denied. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7713 ORDER re dkt# 7705: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7714 ORDER re dkt# 7704: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7715 ORDER re dkt# 7700: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7716 ORDER re dkt# 7698: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7717 ORDER re dkt# 7699: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)
7718 ORDER re dkt# 7693: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 09/29/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 327 of 513

09/29/2000 10/03/2000 10/05/2000
10/06/2000 10/10/2000
10/10/2000 10/12/2000 10/12/2000 10/12/2000 10/12/2000 10/12/2000 10/12/2000 10/12/2000
10/12/2000
10/13/2000 10/13/2000
10/16/2000 10/17/2000 10/17/2000
10/17/2000 10/19/2000

7719 CHECK # 2309815 in the amount of $ 1,964,448.00 payable to Civil Action and Education Corp issued (ft) (Entered: 10/02/2000)

7720 CHECK dated 9/14/00, # 2309788 in the amount of $ 9,226.97 payable to MGT of America issued (ft) (Entered: 10/03/2000)

7721 MOTION req. time to amend and supp. the 5th amended cmp and also req. that the mot to dismiss and the mot. for summ jdmt with respect to damages filed on behalf of individual defts be held in abeyance, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 10/06/2000)

7722 CHECK # 2309816 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ni) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

7723

ORDER directing Correctional Health Services Corp. to proceed with the development of the project regarding the implementation of a medical complex for the provision of inpatient services to the inmates of the Adm. of Corrections. The Court will finance each phase, etc. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/10/2000)

7731 RESPONSE in oppos to govt defts mot to dismiss and/or for summary jdmt by Rafael Hernandez Colon (il) (Entered: 10/13/2000)

7724 ORDER re dkt# 7721: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7725 ORDER re dkt# 7675: Moot. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7726 ORDER re dkt# 7662: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7727 ORDER re dkt# 7650: Moot ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7728 ORDER re dkt# 7615: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7729 ORDER re dkt# 7614: Granted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7724 Report on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisma Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of July, August and September, 2000. (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7730 ORDER Approving report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of Fine Funds for the Year starting July 1, 1996. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 10/12/2000)

7732 Notice that law firm of Shapiro and Olander has changed its name to Shapiro Sher & Guinot. (ni) (Entered: 10/16/2000)

7733 Motion submitting invoice for consulting services from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the months of July, August and September, 2000, in the amt of $85,665.75, w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 10/16/2000)

7734 CHECK # 2309837 in the amount of $ 25,000 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad (advance expenses Oct., Nov., Dec. issued (ni) (Entered: 10/17/2000)

7735 LETTER/MOTION BY Ricardo Mercado pro se informing change of address. (ni) (Entered: 10/18/2000)

7736 LETTER/MOTION BY Mariano Maldonado Pagan pro se in the Spanish language notifying that the inmates are not receiving 2 hours daily of recreational time w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 10/18/2000)

7737 CHECK # 2309843 in the amount of $ 81,008.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 10/18/2000)

7738 MOTION BY THE FRP Director introducing FRP Quarterly report for the period from July 1 to September 30, 2000. (ni) (Entered: 10/20/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 328 of 513

10/20/2000 10/20/2000 10/20/2000 10/23/2000
10/24/2000 10/24/2000 10/24/2000 10/24/2000 10/25/2000 10/25/2000 10/26/2000
10/26/2000 10/26/2000
10/30/2000 10/30/2000 10/30/2000 10/30/2000 10/30/2000 10/31/2000 11/01/2000

7739 CHECK # 2309844 in the amount of $ 7,500 payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez issued (ni) (Entered: 10/23/2000)

7740 CHECK # 2309845 in the amount of $ 7,500 payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez issued (ni) (Entered: 10/23/2000)

7741 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for plaintiff class by Manuel A. Rodriguez−Banchs (ni) (Entered: 10/23/2000)

7742

Minute entry: Hearing called on defts' req. (dkt #7578) that 12 institutions be terminated from the remedial orders of this court. Parties are still conducting discovery on this issue. Testimony on behalf of the defts presented. Hearing cont. for tomorrow at 9:00 AM. Defts' exh A admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/25/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #7738: Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2000)

7743 TRANSCRIPT of hearing on motions filed for date of 10/23/00 (ni) (Entered: 10/25/2000)

7744 CHECK # 2309800 in the amount of $ 2,000 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. (acct month of July for services provided sept/2000) (ni) (Entered: 10/25/2000)

7745 Minute entry: Second day of Hearing held. Further testimony on behalf of the defts presented. Hearing continued for tomorrow at 9:00 A.M. Defts' exh B admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/25/2000)

7747 TRANSCRIPT of hearing filed for date of 10/24/00. Court Reporter: B. Vazquetelles. (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2000)

7748 Minute entry: Third day of Hearing called. Further testimony on behalf of defts presented. Hearing cont. for tomorow at 9:00 AM. Pltfs exh 51−A,55−A, 153 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2000)

7746 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,750.00 to pay Invoice No. 13390 covering services provided in Sept., 2000 in relation to the accounting month of August, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/26/2000)

7749 TRANSCRIPT of Hearing on Motion filed for date of 10/25/00. Court Reporter: B. Vazquetelles. (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2000)

7750

Minute entry: Fourth day of Hearing called. Further testimony on behalf of defts presented. Pltfs move to strike defts' exh B and the testimony of Mr. Garvey as based on unreliable evidence and methodology. Arguments heard and matter stands submitted. This hearing is continued for tomorrow at 9:00 AM. Pltfs' exh 3,21,154−B,202,203 and defts' exh C, D & # admitted (Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) Modified on 10/30/2000 (Entered: 10/30/2000)

7751 TRANSCRIPT of further OSC filed for date of 7/23/98 (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

7752 TRANSCRIPT of further OSC filed for date of 10/15/98 (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

7753 TRANSCRIPT of hearing on motion filed for date of 10/26/00 (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

7754 TRANSCRIPT of hearing on motion filed for date of 10/27/00 (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

7755 Minute entry: Fifth day of Hearing called. Further testimony on behalf of defts presented. Hearing cont. for 10/30/00 at 9:00 AM. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2000)

7756 MINUTES of Setting: hearing on defts' req. that 12 institutions be terminated from the remedial orders will continue at 9:00 on 11/13/00 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ni) (Entered: 11/01/2000)

7756 LETTER from Correctional Health Services Corporation submitting analysis of budget along with disbursements and obligations incurred w/attach. (ni) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 329 of 513

11/03/2000 11/13/2000
11/15/2000 11/15/2000
11/15/2000 11/15/2000
11/17/2000
11/17/2000
11/17/2000 11/17/2000 11/22/2000 11/27/2000 11/29/2000 11/29/2000 11/29/2000 12/01/2000 12/04/2000 12/04/2000
12/06/2000
12/06/2000

12/21/2000)

7757 MOTION for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 11/08/2000)

7758 Minute entry: Sixth day of Hearing called. Further testimony of defts presented. Hearing continued for 11/15/00 at 9:00 AM. Pltf's exhs 115,150,150−A,206,207 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/16/2000)

7759 TRANSCRIPT of hearing on motion filed for date of 11/13/00. Court Reporter: B. Vazquetelles. (ni) (Entered: 11/16/2000)

7760 Motion to withdraw appearance and for continuance of hearing, by lead counsel for govt defts, attys Fax, Luis Guinot, Jr., Barron L. Stroud, Jr. and Venetia Bell. (ni) (Entered: 11/16/2000)

7761 OPPOSITION to motion to withdraw appearance and for continuance of hearing, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 11/16/2000)

7762

Minute entry: Meeting in Chambers. granting [7760−1] motion to withdraw appearance and for continuance of hearing. The w/d law firm is to turn over all the discovery in this case to the new law firm. The hearing will resume sometime during the month of February, 2001. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/16/2000)

7763 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial sociopenal staffing for the month of September, 2000 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

7764 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial sociopenal staffing for the month of Octoer, 2000 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

7765 MOTION SUBMITTING environmental audits, corrective action plans and req. for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

7766 OPPOSITION to pltf's motion to strike testimony and declaration of James T. Garvey, Jr., by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

7767 CHECK # 2309886 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado Villareal issued (ni) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

7768 CHECK # 2309881 in the amount of $ 1,750.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 11/28/2000)

7769 ORDER re: dkt #7731 is noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2000)

7770 ORDER granting dkt #7733. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2000)

7771 ORDER granting dkt #7757 sine die to be brought once hearing resumes. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2000)

7772 CHECK # 2309944 in the amount of $ 85,665.75 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 12/04/2000)

7773 MOTION for costs and attorney fees, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2000)

7774 MOTION for leave to reply to opp. of govt defts to motion of pltfs to strike testimony and declaration of James T. Garvey, Jr., by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2000)

7775 ORDER directing the Clerk to transfer the Medical Cadre budget funds for the year 2001 to the Secretary of the Treasury of PR in the amt of $2,195,093. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2000)

7776 CHECK # 2309963 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 330 of 513

12/07/2000 12/07/2000 12/12/2000 12/12/2000 12/12/2000 12/12/2000
12/12/2000
12/12/2000
12/13/2000 12/13/2000 12/13/2000 12/14/2000 12/14/2000 12/14/2000 12/14/2000 12/20/2000
12/21/2000 12/21/2000

7777 INFORMATIVE motion in response to motion, dkt #7774, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2000)

7778 MOTION for extension of time to respond and/or oppose to pltfs' motion for costs and attorney fees of 12/4/00, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2000)

7779 ORDER noting dkt #7765. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

7780 ORDER noting dkt #7764. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER mooting dkt #7691 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

7781 ORDER for payment of custody fees to Banco Santander in the amt of $100.00 covering custody services on Acct #50−0344−00 for the period of September 1999 to September 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

7782 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 to pay Invoice No. 13562 covering services provided in October, 2000 in relation to the acct month of September, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

7783 ORDER directing transfer of operational budget funds for the third trimester of the year 2000 to the correctional health services corporation in the amt of $1,906,176.00 to the acct #3003380156 at Banco Santander. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

7784 ORDER noting dkt #7763. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/13/2000)

7785 INFORMATIVE motion concerning subpoena to produce and permit inspection and copying of documents, by ptlfs. (ni) (Entered: 12/15/2000)

7786 CHECK # 2309978 in the amount of $ 25,490.17 payable to Juan Carlos Figueroa Avila issued (ni) (Entered: 12/15/2000)

7787 CHECK # 2309981 in the amount of $ 2,195,093.00 payable to Secretary of Treasury of PR issued (ni) (Entered: 12/19/2000)

7788 CHECK # 2309980 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 12/19/2000)

7789 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting services of Nancy I. Boneta Lopez for the months of May thru November, 2000 in the amt of $52,500.00, w/attachment. (ni) (Entered: 12/19/2000)

7790 OPPOSITION to pltfs' motion for costs and attorneys' fees, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 12/19/2000)

7791

OPINION AND ORDER holding deft in contempt for violating Court's Orders. Deft shall deposit with the court the amt of $10,000,000.00 to be used exclusively to alleviate confinement conditions at Ponce Fase III and Bayamon 308 admission cells. Parties will submit w/in 120 days a joint proposal detailing specifically how to resolve the admission cell situation. Further, the Adm. of Corrections will submit a report w/in 60 days informing on the progress or obstacles the proposal is encountering, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (ni) (Entered: 12/20/2000)

ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #7789. Clerk shall proceed to issue a check in Ms. Boneta's name in the amt of $52,500.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/21/2000)

7792 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. Invoice #13665 in the amt of $1,625.00 for services provided in November, 2000 in relation to acct month of October, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/21/2000)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 331 of 513

12/28/2000
12/28/2000 12/29/2000 01/03/2001 01/04/2001 01/10/2001 01/10/2001 01/10/2001 01/11/2001
01/12/2001 01/12/2001 01/12/2001 01/12/2001 01/12/2001 01/12/2001 01/12/2001 01/17/2001 01/17/2001 01/17/2001

7793 ORDER directing the transfer of fine monies to the University of PR to support the Institute of Corrections and Rehabilitation to continue the training of the Medical Cadre from 12/7/00 to March 2001, etc as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ft) Modified on 12/28/2000 (Entered: 12/28/2000)

7795 CHECK # 2470536 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (ft) (Entered: 01/03/2001)

7794 Motion by pltfs to deny dft's motion to terminate and req for atty's fees. (ft) (Entered: 01/02/2001)

7796 Tenth Report of the External University Edication System (ft) (Entered: 01/04/2001)

7797 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering the months of October, November and December, 2000 w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 01/08/2001)

7798 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of November, 2000 and request for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 01/11/2001)

7799 INFORMATIVE MOTION re: newly appt counsel will file notice of appearance within a few days. (ni) (Entered: 01/11/2001)

7800 MOTION submitting invoice from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for consulting services for the months of October, November and December, 2000, in the amt of $91,527.00, w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 01/11/2001)

7801

ORDER approving report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad (dkt #7797) and authorizing advancement of fine funds for the year starting July 1, 1996. Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $25,000 to HCST, as an advancement for the expenses to be incurred during the months of January, February and March, 2001. The funds shall be deposited in a separate acct to be used solely for the operation of the HCST. Further, the staff of HCST shall submit by the fifth day of April, 2001, an expense report, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/11/2001)

7802 CHECK # 2470552 in the amount of $ 54,900.00 payable to University of PR issued (ni) (Entered: 01/12/2001)

7803 REPORT OF EVALUATION OF STATE PENITENTIARY: MARCH, 1999 w/attach, submitted by Dr. Ernesto Torres Arroyo, Executive Director of Health Correctional Services Program. (ni) Modified on 02/27/2001 (Entered: 01/12/2001)

7804 APPLICATION by PRODECEN requesting payment of $235,000.00 for the vocational training provided to inmates in the custody of Administration of Corrections. (ni) (Entered: 01/16/2001)

7805 ORDER approving dkt #7804 and directing the Clerk of the Court to issue a check in the amt of $235,000.00 from the fine funds under the court's control to PRODECEN. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/16/2001)

7806 CHECK # 2470555 in the amount of $ 25,000 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

7807 DESIGNATION of alternate lead counsel, Manuel A. Rodriguez Banchs, Esq., during absence from PR from 1/12 to 1/16/01, by Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

7808 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE and req. for order to extend the term staying all pending matters, by atty Luis Sanchez Betances on behalf of govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

7809 ORDER denying w/o prejudice [dkt #7773] motion for costs and attorney's fees. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

7810 ORDER mooting dkt #7778. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

7811 ORDER noting dkt #7785. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 332 of 513

01/17/2001 01/17/2001 01/17/2001 01/17/2001
01/17/2001 01/17/2001
01/17/2001 01/18/2001 01/18/2001
01/22/2001 01/22/2001 01/22/2001 01/23/2001 01/23/2001 01/24/2001 01/24/2001 01/29/2001 01/31/2001 02/02/2001 02/02/2001

7812 ORDER noting dkt #7790. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)
7813 ORDER noting dkt #7798. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)
7814 ORDER noting dkt #7799. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)
7815 ORDER granting [dkt #7800] submitting invoice for consulting services of Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the months of October, November & December 2000 in the amt of $91,527.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)
7816 LETTER req. reimbursement of funds for the Medical Cadre Achievement Awards Ceremony w/attach, by the Correctional Health Program Director. (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)
7817 ORDER granting [dkt #7816] to reimburse funds for the Medical Cadre Achievement Awards Ceremony in the amt of $9,341.00 to the order of Secretary of the Treasury of PR ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2001)
7818 CHECK # 2470570 in the amount of $ 235,000.00 payable to PRODESEN issued (ni) (Entered: 01/18/2001)
7819 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of December, 2000 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 01/22/2001)
7820 MOTION in compliance with court order dated August 18, 1992 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce Pilot Project and for leave to file documents in Spanish (Report covering the period of September 30, 2000), by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 01/22/2001)
7821 CHECK # 2470539 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (ni) (Entered: 01/24/2001)
7822 CHECK # 2470530 in the amount of $ 52,500.00 payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez issued (ni) (Entered: 01/24/2001)
7823 MOTION req. copy of MGT of America, Inc.'s project work plan, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 01/24/2001)
7824 MOTION introducing FRP Quarterly report (Dec., 2000), by Facilities Rehabilitation Program Director. (ni) (Entered: 01/24/2001)
7825 RESPONSE to deft's informative motion of 1/10/01 and req. for order of 1/12/01 and req. for an urgent S/C on the record, by pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 01/25/2001)
7826 CHECK # 2470579 in the amount of $ 91,527.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 01/25/2001)
7827 CHECK # 2470580 in the amount of $ 9,341.00 payable to Secretary of The Treasury of PR issued (ni) (Entered: 01/25/2001)
7828 REPLY to (dkt #7825) pltfs' response to deft's informative motion of 1/10/01 and request for order of 1/12/01 and Request for S/C (ni) (Entered: 01/30/2001)
7829 MINUTES of Setting: set Status Conference for 4:00 2/2/01 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ni) (Entered: 02/01/2001)
7830 ORDER regarding dkt# 7825 set Status Conference for 4:00 2/2/01 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (il) (Entered: 02/02/2001)
7831 MOTION for TRO and preliminary injunction regarding Intake Centers, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 02/05/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 333 of 513

02/02/2001
02/02/2001 02/06/2001 02/06/2001 02/06/2001 02/06/2001 02/06/2001 02/06/2001 02/07/2001 02/08/2001 02/08/2001
02/08/2001 02/08/2001 02/12/2001 02/12/2001
02/14/2001 02/14/2001 02/14/2001 02/14/2001 02/14/2001

7832

Minute entry: S/C called. Pltfs are instructed to file a mot. to change the names of the defts. Pltfs are assured that the admission center will not be transferred to Guerrero, therefore the Court denies as moot the req. for a TRO at this time. The req. for a preliminary injunction is pending. A meeting is scheduled for 2/8/01 at 5:30 PM. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) Modified on 02/12/2001 (Entered: 02/06/2001)

Status Conference held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (ni) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

7833 ORDER noting and granting dkt #7820. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/06/2001)

7834 ORDER mooting dkt #7807. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2001)

7835 ORDER noting dkt #7819. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2001)

7836 ORDER noting dkt #7824. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2001)

7837 ORDER noting dkt #7828. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2001)

7838 MOTION in compliance with court order, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2001)

7839 MOTION req. TRO to prevent the Secretary of Health from terminating the contract of Dr. Ernesto Torres Arroyo, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 02/08/2001)

7840 ORDER noting dkt #7808. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/08/2001)

7841

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER enjoining the Secretary of Health and defts Drs. Pedro Ramos Hiraldo, Johnny Rullan, Wilberto Santiago and Ricardo Munoz from removing Dr. Ernesto Torres Arroyo from the position of Executive Director of the Correctional Health Program until the court has heard the parties and the evidence on this matter, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/08/2001)

7842 CHECK # 2470601 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (ni) (Entered: 02/09/2001)

7843 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Plaintiffs by Jose R. Roque−Velazquez (ni) (Entered: 02/09/2001)

7844 ORDER noting dkt #7838. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/12/2001)

7845 MINUTES of Setting: setting hearing on the req. for a TRO dkt #7839 for 10:00 on 2/14/01 and the hearing on defts' req. that 12 institutions be terminated from the remedial orders of this court will continue on 3/12/01 at 9:00 ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/13/2001)

7846 TRANSCRIPT of S/C filed for date of 2/2/01 Court Reporter: B. Vazquetelles. (ni) (Entered: 02/15/2001)

7847 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Defendants by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz as part of the Civil Rights Legal Task Force of the DOJ. (ni) (Entered: 02/15/2001)

7848 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Eileen Landron Guardiola and Eduardo A. Vera Ramirez. (ni) (Entered: 02/15/2001)

7849 MOTION regarding designation of Dr. Aida Guzman Font, M.D. as Chief Health Care Coordinator of the Correctional Health Program of the Department of Health of the Commonwealth of P.R., w/attach, by defts. (ni) (Entered: 02/15/2001)

7851 Minute entry: TRO hearing called. Defts make an oral motion to dismiss which is taken under advisement. Testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Hearing continued for tomorrow at 2:00 PM. Pltfs' exhs 5,8,9,15 and 16 admitted. ( Judge Juan M.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 334 of 513

02/15/2001 02/15/2001
02/16/2001 02/20/2001 02/20/2001 02/20/2001 02/20/2001
02/20/2001
02/22/2001
02/23/2001 02/23/2001 02/23/2001 02/23/2001 02/23/2001 02/23/2001 02/23/2001 02/28/2001
03/01/2001
03/01/2001
03/02/2001

Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

7850 ORDER granting dkt #7823. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/15/2001)

7852 Minute entry: Second day of TRO hearing called. Testimony on behalf of ptlfs presented. Pltfs req. TRO be extended for 10 days. Hearing continued for 2/21/01 at 9:00 AM. Pltfs' exh 1−4,6,7,10−14,17(a)−17(h) and 18 admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

7853 MOTION to extend TRO for 10 days, by ptlf class. (ni) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

7854 ORDER granting [dkt #7853] pltfs' motion to extend the TRO until 3/9/01. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

7855 TRANSCRIPT filed of TRO for date of 2/14/01 (ni) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

7856 TRANSCRIPT filed of TRO for date of 2/15/01 (ni) (Entered: 02/20/2001)

7857 MOTION for brief extension of time of 2 days to file the partial report object of order of 12/20/00, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 02/21/2001)

7858

Minute entry: Third day of TRO hearing called. Further testimony on behalf of pltfs presented. Parties will submit by 3/2/01 a motion submitting orders for court's approval as to the appointment of Dr. Guzman as Chief Health Care Coordinator. Hearing is suspended until then. TRO remains in effect until 3/9/01. Pltfs' exhs 19 thru 25(a) admitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

7859 MOTION in compliance with court order and submitting 60 day report of the Adm. of Correction and Rehabilitation, w/attach, by co−deft Secy/Adm. Victor Rivera Gonzalez. (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #7847. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #7848. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #7857. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

7860 ORDER granting dkt #7857. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

7861 LETTER from MGT dated 12/5/00 submitting invoice #8802 for professional services, w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

7862 ORDER granting dkt #7861. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

7863 TRANSCRIPT filed of TRO hearing for date of 2/20/01 (ni) (Entered: 02/26/2001)

7864 MOTION for leave to w/d, "Verified motion of govt defts to terminate prospective relief relating to certain facilities and to terminate facilities from litigation", w/o prejudice, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

7865 LETTER dated 2/26/01 requesting consideration of funding for the training of 6 additional Medical Cadre groups starting the month of March, 2001, by Director of Institute of Corrections & Rehabilitation of the University of P.R. w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

7866 ORDER directing the transfer of fine monies in the amt of $36,600.00 to support training to the Medical Cadre by the Institute of Corrections and Rehabilitation of the University of P.R. starting March 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/01/2001)

7867 ORDER granting dkt #7843. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/05/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 335 of 513

03/02/2001 03/02/2001 03/02/2001 03/05/2001 03/05/2001 03/08/2001 03/09/2001
03/09/2001 03/12/2001
03/13/2001 03/13/2001 03/13/2001 03/13/2001 03/13/2001 03/13/2001 03/14/2001
03/15/2001 03/21/2001 03/21/2001 03/21/2001

7868 SUBMISSION of second creation of the Chief Health Care Coordinator, w/attach, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 03/05/2001)
7869 MOTION for protective order as to the taking of depositions , by co−deft Secretary/Adm. of Correction and Rehab., Victor Rivera Gonzalez. (ni) (Entered: 03/05/2001)
7870 MOTION concerning appointment and powers of Chief Health Care Coordinator, by co−deft John Rullan in his official capacity as Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 03/06/2001)
7871 URGENT motion for protective order to set aside depositions, by co−deft Secretary/Adm. of Correction and Rehab., Victor Rivera Gonzalez. (ni) (Entered: 03/06/2001)
7872 CHECK # 2470771 in the amount of $ 36,600 payable to University of PR Institute of Correction and Rehabilitation issued (ni) (Entered: 03/07/2001)
7873 CHECK # 2470761 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (ni) (Entered: 03/09/2001)
7874 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 to cover invoice #13903 for services provided in January, 2001 in relation to the acct month of December, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/12/2001)
7876 SECOND MOTION concerning appointment and powers of Chief Health Care Coordinator, w/attach, by Secretary of Health John V. Rullan. (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2001)
7875 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $1,625.00 to cover invoice No. 13811 for services provided in December, 2000 in relation to the acct month of November, 2000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/12/2001)
7877 ORDER noting dkt #7868 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2001)
7878 ORDER mooting dkt #7869. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2001)
7879 ORDER noting dkt #7870. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2001)
7880 ORDER mooting dkt #7871. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2001)
7881 Invoice #9010 from MGT of America for professional fees for December, 2000 thru January 2001 in the amt of $165,976.10 w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2001)
7882 ORDER granting dkt #7881. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2001)
7883 Minute entry: advising parties that hearing set for 3/12/01 would not be held. Defts have filed a req. to be allowed to w/d their motion req. termination of 12 institutions from the remedial orders. Pltfs have opposed it and both motions stand submitted. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/15/2001)
7884 OPPOSITION to defts' motion for leave to withdraw, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 03/19/2001)
7885 CHECK # 2470755 in the amount of $ 62,404.96 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 03/21/2001)
7886 CHECK # 2470800 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 03/21/2001)
7887 CHECK # 2470801 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 03/21/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 336 of 513

03/21/2001 03/21/2001 03/28/2001 04/03/2001 04/03/2001 04/04/2001 04/06/2001 04/06/2001 04/06/2001
04/06/2001
04/09/2001 04/10/2001 04/10/2001
04/10/2001 04/11/2001
04/11/2001 04/11/2001

7888 ORDER granting dkt #7884. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/21/2001)

7889 OPPOSITION to Secretary of Health's Second Motion Concerning Appointment and Powers of Chief Health Care Coordinator, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 03/22/2001)

7890 MOTION req. clarification of order dated 3/20/01, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 03/29/2001)

7891 MOTION submitting invoice from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for consulting services during the month of March 2001 in the amt of $16,799, w/attach, by equitable defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/03/2001)

7892 CHECK # 2470825 dated 3/14/01 in the amount of $ 165,976.10 payable to MGT of America, Inc. issued (ni) (Entered: 04/03/2001)

7893 REPORT on the use of find funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of January, February, and March, 2001, w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 04/06/2001)

7894 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of January 2001 and req. for leave to file in spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

7895 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of February 2001 and req. for leave to file in spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

7896 MOTION in compliance with Court Order dated 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce Pilot Project, report covering the period of 9/30/00, and for leave to file in spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

7897 MOTION in compliance with Court Order dated 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce Pilot Project, report covering the period of 12/31/00, and for leave to file in spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/09/2001)

7898 CHECK # 2470956 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (ni) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

7899 Letter motion submitting invoice PAC−2001 in the amt of $279,999.72 for payment of vocational training of inmates, by PRODECEN w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

7900 ORDER granting [dkt #7899] directing the clerk to issue payment in the amt of $279,999.72 from the fine funds held by this court for payment of vocational training of inmates. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

7901 Designation of alternate lead counsel Manuel Rodriguez Banchs since atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez will be away from PR from 4−10−01 to 4−16−01. (ni) (Entered: 04/11/2001)

7902

ORDER approving 7893 report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. The clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $25,000 to the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad as an advancement for the expenses to be incurred during the months of April, May, and June, 2001. Further, by the fifth day of July 2001 the staff of the HCST shall submit to the court an expense report detailing how the funds advanced have been used. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/11/2001)

7903 CHECK # 2470987 in the amount of $ 279,999.72 payable to PRODESEN issued (ni) (Entered: 04/12/2001)

7904 MOTION for an extension of time for 30 days to comply with O & O of 12/20/00 to submit joint proposal detailing how to resolve the admission cell situation and setting of S/C, by pltf class and equitable defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/12/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 337 of 513

04/11/2001 04/17/2001
04/17/2001 04/19/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001 04/24/2001
04/24/2001
04/26/2001 04/27/2001 04/27/2001 05/01/2001
05/03/2001

7905 MOTION submitting fire safety audits and corrective action plans for the period of April 2000 thru September 2000 and request for leave to file them in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/12/2001)
7906 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co in the amt of $1,625.00; invoice #14139 covering services provided in February and March, 2001 in relation to the acct month of January, 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/17/2001)
7907 CHECK # 2470986 in the amount of $ 25,000 payable to Hogar Catolica Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 04/18/2001)
7908 ORDER re: dkt. #7890: The Ct. vacates the 3/20/01 order and directs defts. to w/d their verified mot. to terminate prospective relief w/o prej., etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (re) (Entered: 04/19/2001)
7909 ORDER granting dkt #7904. S/C is set for 4/24/01 at 5:00 PM.( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7910 ORDER granting dkt #7891. A check in the amt of $16,799.00 shall be issued by the Clerk in favor of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7911 ORDER noting dkt #7897. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7912 ORDER noting dkt #7896. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7913 ORDER noting dkt #7894. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7914 ORDER noting dkt #7895. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7915 ORDER noting dkt #7905. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7916 CHECK # 2470991 in the amount of $ 1,625.00 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2001)
7917 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of March, 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attachments, by govt defts. (ni) Modified on 04/25/2001 (Entered: 04/25/2001)
7918 MOTION in compliance with court order dated 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly accounting reports (covering the period of March 31, 2001) for the Ponce Pilot Project and for leave to file documents in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 04/25/2001)
7919 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting service from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the months of January and February, 2001 in the amt of $35,960.00, w/attachment, by equitable defts. (ni) (Entered: 05/01/2001)
7920 CHECK # 2522802 in the amount of $ 16,799.00 payable to Curnyn Consuling, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 05/01/2001)
7921 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for professional fees for March 2001 in the amt of $165,799.69, w/attachment, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 05/01/2001)
7922 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. Invoice #14235 in the amt of $2,000.00 covering services provided in March and April, 2001 in relation to the acct month of February, 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/01/2001)
7923 CHECK # 2522829 in the amount of $ 2,000 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 05/04/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 338 of 513

05/04/2001 05/04/2001 05/08/2001 05/08/2001 05/08/2001 05/08/2001 05/10/2001 05/16/2001 05/17/2001
05/17/2001 05/17/2001 05/17/2001
05/17/2001
05/21/2001 05/21/2001
05/22/2001
05/22/2001 05/25/2001 05/25/2001
05/25/2001
05/29/2001

7924 CHECK # 2522842 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (ni) (Entered: 05/07/2001)
7925 MOTION introducing Quarterly Report for the period from January 1 to March 31, 2001, w/attach, by FRP. (ni) (Entered: 05/07/2001)
7926 ORDER noting dkt #7917. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/08/2001)
7927 ORDER noting dkt #7918. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/08/2001)
7928 ORDER granting dkt #7919. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/08/2001)
7929 ORDER granting dkt #7921. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/08/2001)
7930 ORDER noting dkt #7925. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/10/2001)
7931 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stip. regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 05/17/2001)
7932 LETTERS addressed to August E. Bauer dated 2/23/01 and 5/15/01 authorizing the wire transfer of all interests or dividends to acct # 0501−00001−7 at Banco Santander, ABA Number 021502341. (ni) (Entered: 05/22/2001)
7933 CHECK # 2522869 in the amount of $ 165,799.69 payable to MGT OF AMERICA, INC. issued (ni) (Entered: 05/22/2001)
7934 CHECK # 2522870 in the amount of $ 35,960.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting LTD. issued (ni) (Entered: 05/22/2001)
7935 INVOICE # 9156 dated 4/6/01 for professional fees for the month of February, 2001 in the amt of $171,915.08, w/attach, by MGT OF AMERICA. (ni) Modified on 06/29/2001 (Entered: 05/24/2001)
7936 INVOICE # 9253 dated 5/8/01 for professional services for the month of April, 2001 in the amt of $152,935.27, w/attch, by MGT OF AMERICA, INC. (ni) (Entered: 05/24/2001)
7937 JOINT PROPOSAL to resolve administration of corrections (AOC) admission confinement conditions, w/attachment. (ni) (Entered: 05/24/2001)
7937 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of April, 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2001)
7938 ORDER for investment transaction with Santander Securities, Inc. in the total amount of $1,520,123.45, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/24/2001)
7939 CHECK # 2522908 in the amount of $ 1,520,123.45 payable to Santander Securities issued (ni) (Entered: 05/24/2001)
7940 ORDER noting dkt #7931. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/25/2001)
7941 ORDER of the creation and organization of a private, not−for−profit corporation, Correctional Health Services Corporation (CHSC) to replace the present Correctional Health Program (CHP), etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/25/2001)
7942 DESIGNATION of alternate lead counsel Jose E. Fernandez Seiz and Jose Roque Velazquez during 5/25/01 to 6/3/01, by Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (ni) (Entered: 05/29/2001)
7943 INFORMATIVE motion and req. to be notified by mail until telephone lines are connected, by attys Eileen Landron and Eduardo Vera on behalf of Secretary of

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 339 of 513

05/30/2001
06/01/2001 06/01/2001
06/04/2001 06/04/2001 06/04/2001 06/04/2001 06/05/2001
06/05/2001 06/06/2001 06/07/2001 06/11/2001
06/11/2001 06/11/2001 06/19/2001 06/20/2001 06/20/2001 06/21/2001 06/21/2001 06/21/2001 06/21/2001

Health, Hon. John Rullan. (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2001)
7944 INFORMATIVE motion concerning appointment by the Commonwealth of PR of the Secretary of Justice as the governor's personal representative, w/attach, by Commonwealth defts. (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2001)
7945 Proposed budget for 2001−2002 w/attach, by Hogar Santisima Trinidad. (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2001)
7946 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. Invoice #14406 in the amt of $2,300 covering services provided in April, 2001 in relation to the acct month of March, 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2001)
7947 ORDER approving for payment dkt #7935. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2001)
7948 ORDER approving for payment dkt #7936. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2001)
7949 ORDER noting dkt #7942. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2001)
7950 ORDER noting and granting dkt #7943 as requested. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2001)
7951 REQUEST for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman, M.D. as Chief Health Care Coordinator, by codeft Secretary of Health, John Rullan. (ni) (Entered: 06/06/2001)
7952 CHECK # 2522931 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 06/06/2001)
7953 CHECK # 2522928 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (ni) (Entered: 06/07/2001)
7954 ORDER noting dkt #7944. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/07/2001)
7955 FIRST scheduled motion in compliance with joint proposal to resolve Adm. of Corrections (AOC) admission confinement conditions, w/attach, by govt defts except Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2001)
7956 MOTION req. termination of FRP program and office, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2001)
7957 MOTION req. reconsideration of Order dated 5/23/01, by Secretary of Health, Hon. John Rulan. (ni) (Entered: 06/13/2001)
7958 SECOND scheduled motion in compliance with joint proposal, w/attachments, by all govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 06/20/2001)
7959 CHECK # 2522943 in the amount of $ 171,915.08 payable to MGM of America, Inc. issued (ni) (Entered: 06/20/2001)
7960 CHECK # 2522935 in the amount of $ 152,935.27 payable to MGT of America issued on 6/5/01 (ni) (Entered: 06/20/2001)
7961 ORDER noting dkt #7955. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/21/2001)
7962 ORDER noting dkt #7937A. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/21/2001)
7963 ORDER denying dkt #7957. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/21/2001)
7964 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice # 5/01 from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the month of April, 2001 in the amt of $24,387.00. w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 06/21/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 340 of 513

06/21/2001
06/21/2001 06/21/2001
06/22/2001 06/25/2001 06/25/2001
06/26/2001 06/26/2001 06/26/2001 06/28/2001
07/02/2001 07/02/2001
07/03/2001 07/03/2001
07/03/2001 07/05/2001 07/05/2001 07/05/2001
07/06/2001
07/09/2001 07/10/2001

7965 ORDER granting dkt #7964. Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $24,387.00 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/21/2001)
7966 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice # 8/01 for the month of May, 2001 from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd in the amt of $11,494.00 w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 06/21/2001)
7967 ORDER granting dkt #7966. Clerk to issue a check in the amt of $11,494 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/21/2001)
7968 ORDER noting dkt #7958 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/22/2001)
7969 OPPOSITION to defts' motion requesting termination of FRP program and office, by pltfs class. (ni) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 06/28/2001)
7970 OPPOSITION to defts' request for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guxman, by pltf class, w/attach (ni) Modified on 06/28/2001 (Entered: 06/28/2001)
7971 OPPOSITION to deft Rullan's motion requesting reconsideration of order, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 06/28/2001)
7972 CHECK # 2523024 in the amount of $ 24,387.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 06/28/2001)
7973 CHECK # 2323025 in the amount of $ 11,494.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 06/28/2001)
7974 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice #9347 in the amt of $157,544.42 for professional services for May 2001, (Payment #5), by MGT of America, w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 06/28/2001)
7975 MOTION introducing FRP quarterly report, w/attach, by FRP Director (ni) (Entered: 07/03/2001)
7976 REPORT on the use of find funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of April, May, and June, 2001, w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 07/03/2001)
7977 ORDER mooting dkt #7977. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/03/2001)
7978 ORDER approving dkt #7974. The Clerk shall issue a check to MGT of America in the amt of $157,544.42. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/03/2001)
7980 CHECK # 2523047 in the amount of $ 5,000 payable to Ramon Mellado issued (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7979 Minute entry: set Status Conference for 5:30 7/12/01 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ov) (Entered: 07/05/2001)
7981 Informative Motion by Defendant−All except for the Secretary of Health re: compliance with joint proposal. (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7982 MOTION by Carlos Morales−Feliciano for Disbursement of Funds in the amt of $2,906,074 to the Civil Action and Eductaion Corp. for the fiscal year 7/1/01 to 6/30/02 (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7983 MOTION SUBMITTING proposal to introduce the Sport Micro Enterprise concept in the correction system, by Deporte para Todos, Inc. w/attachment (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7984 MOTION SUBMITTING third scheduled mot in compliance with joint proposal w/attachment by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7985 MOTION IN compliance with paragraph 56 of the STIPULATION regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the Month of May 2001 and req for leave to file

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 341 of 513

07/10/2001 07/12/2001
07/12/2001 07/12/2001 07/12/2001 07/16/2001 07/16/2001 07/16/2001 07/16/2001 07/16/2001 07/19/2001 07/20/2001 07/20/2001 07/20/2001 07/20/2001 07/20/2001 07/23/2001 07/23/2001 07/24/2001

in Spanish by Defendant−All . (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7986 MOTION SUBMITTING fire safety audits and corrective action plans for the period of June 2000 thru Jan 2001 and req for leave to file them in Spanish w/attachment by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7987 ORDER approving rpt of The Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds. The Clerk of the Court is to issue a check in the amt of $27,500 for expenses during the months of Jul, Aug and Sept 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7988 ORDER noting #7975 quarterly report by FRP ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/12/2001)
7989 CHECK # 2523073 in the amount of $ 27,500 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (np) (Entered: 07/16/2001)
7990 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice for consulting service for the months of 12/0, Jan 01, Feb 01, Mar 01, Apr 01, May 01, and Jun 01 in the amt of $52,500 by Nancy I. Boneta Lopez w/attachment by Defendant−All (np) (Entered: 07/16/2001)
7991 ORDER noting #7981 in compliance with joint proposal ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/16/2001)
7992 ORDER referring proposal of Deporte Para Todos, Inc. to the Civil Action and Education Corp for their analysis and comments. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/16/2001)
7993 ORDER noting #7984 third scheduled mot in compliance with joint proposal ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/16/2001)
7994 ORDER noting #7985 in compliance with Paragraph 56 of the stip regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for 5/01 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/16/2001)
7995 ORDER noting #7986 re fire safety audits and corrective action plan for 6/00 thru 1/01 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/16/2001)
7996 Minute entry: set Status Conference for 5:30 8/2/01 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/20/2001)
7997 ORDER the Clerk is to issue a check in the amt of $1,000,000 payable to Civil Action and Education Corp. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/20/2001)
7998 ORDER the Clerk of the Court is to issue a check in the amt of $144,444.30 payable to Proceden for vocational training. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 07/20/2001)
7999 NOTICE OF APPEAL [7941−1] order, [7963−1] order by Johnny Rullan . FILING FEE $ 105 RECEIPT # 119171 Transcript Order Form furnished to appellant Appeal record due on 7/30/01 (ni) (Entered: 07/24/2001)
8000 Fourth scheduled motion in compliance with joint proposal, w/attach, by govt defts except Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 07/24/2001)
8001 MOTION req. resolution of request for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman, as Chief Health Coordinator, by Secretary of Health John Rullan. (ni) (Entered: 07/24/2001)
8002 CHECK # 2523099 in the amount of $ 1,000,000.00 payable to Civil Action & Education Corporation issued (ni) (Entered: 07/24/2001)
8003 MOTION for leave to allow pltfs to photograph or videotape the Guayama's 946 institution, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 07/24/2001)
8004 CHECK # 2523100 in the amount of $ 144,444.30 payable to Prodecen, Inc. issued (ni) (Entered: 07/26/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 342 of 513

07/26/2001 07/26/2001
07/26/2001
07/27/2001 07/30/2001 07/31/2001 07/31/2001 08/01/2001 08/01/2001 08/01/2001 08/01/2001 08/06/2001 08/06/2001 08/06/2001 08/06/2001 08/09/2001 08/14/2001 08/17/2001
08/20/2001 08/20/2001 08/22/2001 08/22/2001

8005 ORDER noting dkt #8000. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/26/2001)
8006 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $2,300.00. for services provided in May, 2001 in relation to the acct month of April, 2001. Invoice #14593. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/27/2001)
8007 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $2,300.00 for services provided in June, 2001 in relation to the acct month of May, 2001. Invoice #14717. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/27/2001)
8008 INVOICE #9431 for professional fees for June 2001 (payment #6) in the amt of $174,585.26, w/attachment, by MGT. (ni) (Entered: 07/30/2001)
8010 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 08/01/2001)
8009 CHECK # 2523056 dated 7/5/01 in the amount of $ 157,544.42 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2001)
8011 JOINT MOTION req. rescheduling of S/C, by parties. (ni) (Entered: 08/01/2001)
8012 ORDER granting dkt #8003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/01/2001)
8013 MINUTES of Setting: set Status Conference for 5:30 8/7/01 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/01/2001)
8014 CHECK # 2523123 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to Vila Del Corral and Company issued (ja) (Entered: 08/02/2001)
8015 CHECK # 2523122 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to Vila Del Corral and Company issued (ja) (Entered: 08/02/2001)
8016 ORDER noting dkt #8010. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/06/2001)
8017 ORDER approving dkt #7990. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/06/2001)
8018 ORDER granting dkt #8008. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/06/2001)
8019 MOTION for continuance of S/C, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 08/07/2001)
8020 ORDER granting dkt #8019 continuance of S/C. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/09/2001)
8021 CHECK # 2523190 in the amount of $ 52,500 payable to Nancy Boneta Lopez issued (ni) (Entered: 08/16/2001)
Certified and transmitted Record on Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: [7999−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan (dkts #863,3453,7876,7889,7937A,7941,7957,7958,7963,7971,7999) (ni) (Entered: 08/27/2001)
8022 MOTION SUBMITTING monitoring report, w/attachment, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 08/22/2001)
8023 INFORMATIVE motion regarding Bayamon MDU, by govt defts, except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 08/22/2001)
8024 OPERATIONAL BUDGET − Correctional Health Services Corporation, 2001 w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 08/22/2001)
8025 CHECK #2523191 payable to MGT of America, in the amt of $174,585.26. (ni) (Entered: 08/22/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 343 of 513

08/22/2001
08/23/2001 08/23/2001 08/23/2001 08/23/2001 08/23/2001 08/23/2001 08/24/2001 08/24/2001 08/28/2001
08/30/2001 08/31/2001 09/06/2001 09/07/2001 09/07/2001 09/08/2001 09/12/2001 09/12/2001 09/13/2001 09/13/2001

8026

ORDER approving the Correctional Health Services Corporation budget for 2001 natural year and transfer of operational budget funds for the third trimester of the year 2001 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation in the amt of $3,156,936 to the acct number 3003380156 at Banco Santander, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/22/2001)

8027 INVOICE #9/01 for professional and consulting services for the month of June, 2001, in the amt of $19,143.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. w/attach. (ni) Modified on 08/23/2001 (Entered: 08/23/2001)

8028 ORDER approving dkt #8027 for payment. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/23/2001)

8029 INVOICE #10/01 for professional and consulting services for the month of July, 2001, in the amt of $20,859.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 08/23/2001)

8030 ORDER approving dkt #8029 for payment. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/23/2001)

8031 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Santander Securities, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/23/2001)

8032 ORDER for sale of investment instruments with Santander Securities. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/23/2001)

8033 ORDER noting dkt #8023. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/27/2001)

8034 ORDER noting dkt #8022. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/27/2001)

8035 ORDER for sale and investment transaction of U.S. Treasury Notes with Santander Securities, Inc. Sale of Note in the face value of $10,540,000 and purchase of Note in the face value of $10,751,000, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/29/2001)

8036 CHECK # 2523309 in the amount of $ 20,859.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting issued (ni) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

8037 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/05/2001)

8038 INVOICE #9518 for July 2001 (payment #7) in the amt of $161,067.77, by MGT of America w/attachments. (ni) (Entered: 09/07/2001)

8039 ORDER noting dkt #8037 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/07/2001)

8040 MOTION req. approval of proposal and authorization for the use funds to develop rehabilitation instrument, by Deporte para Todos. (ni) (Entered: 09/13/2001)

8058 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 10/03/2001)

8041 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of June 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, by govt govts w/attachments. (ni) (Entered: 09/13/2001)

8042 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of July 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, by govt govts w/attachments. (ni) (Entered: 09/13/2001)

8043 ORDER approving dkt #8038. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/13/2001)

8044 INVOICE #11/01 from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for professional services for the month of August, 2001 in the amt of $40,616.00. (ni) (Entered: 09/13/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 344 of 513

09/13/2001 09/18/2001 09/18/2001 09/18/2001 09/20/2001 09/26/2001 09/28/2001 09/28/2001 09/28/2001 09/28/2001 09/28/2001
09/28/2001
10/01/2001 10/01/2001 10/03/2001 10/04/2001 10/04/2001 10/09/2001 10/10/2001 10/11/2001

8045 ORDER granting dkt #8044. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/13/2001)
8046 CHECK # 2523385 in the amount of $ 40,616.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 09/19/2001)
8047 CHECK # 2523310 in the amount of $ 19,143.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 09/19/2001)
8048 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of August, 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attachments. (ni) (Entered: 09/19/2001)
8049 DESIGNATION of alternate lead counsel Manuel Rodriguez Banchs during atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez' absence from PR from 9/20 to 9/26/01, on behalf of pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 09/21/2001)
8050 INVOICE #9591 for professional fees for August, 2001 (payment #8) in the amt of $157,955.74, w/attach, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 09/27/2001)
8051 REPORT of Revaluation of Services at Penitenciaria Estatal for May, 2001. (ni) Modified on 09/28/2001 (Entered: 09/28/2001)
8052 ORDER noting dkt #8048. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/28/2001)
8053 ORDER for payment of custody fees on Acct #50−0005−00 to Banco Santander in the amt of $79.16 for the period of 2/1/00 to 8/24/01. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2001)
8054 ORDER for payment of custody fees on Acct #50−0344−00 to Banco Santander in the amt of $100.00 for the period of 9/2/00 to 8/24/01. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2001)
8055 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $ 2,300.00 for the services provided in July, 2001 in relation to the acct month of June, 2001. Invoice #14894. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2001)
8056 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $ 2,300.00 for the services provided in August, 2001 in relation to the acct month of July, 2001. Invoice #15022. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2001)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #7578. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2001)
8057 ORDER approving dkt #8050. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2001)
USCA Case Number Re: [7999−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan USCA NUMBER: 01−2201 (ni) (Entered: 10/11/2001)
8059 CHECK # 2523437 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 10/11/2001)
8060 CHECK # 2523438 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 10/11/2001)
8061 Report on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of July, August and September, 2001. (ni) (Entered: 10/11/2001)
8062 ORDER noting dkt #8058 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/11/2001)
8063 Certified copy of Order from USCCA on 9/19/01 for motion to supplement the DC record to be forwarded to the DC for proper action. The doc. in question are: #373,868,869,1959, 2465,4156,6091,6093,6673 and 6814. (ni) (Entered: 10/11/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 345 of 513

10/11/2001 10/11/2001 10/11/2001 10/15/2001 10/17/2001
10/22/2001
10/23/2001 10/23/2001 10/23/2001 10/24/2001
10/24/2001 10/26/2001 10/26/2001 10/26/2001 10/29/2001 10/30/2001 10/30/2001 10/30/2001 10/30/2001

8064 THIRD motion req. resolution of req. for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman, by codeft Secretary of Health (ni) (Entered: 10/16/2001)

8065 MOTION in compliance with court order of 12/17/92 and for leave to file documents in Spanish, by govt defts w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 10/16/2001)

8066 MOTION in compliance with court order dated 8/18/92 regarding the submission of quarterly acct reports for the Ponce Pilot Project and for leave to file doc. in the Spanish language, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 10/16/2001)

8067 CHECK # 2523453 in the amount of $ 157,955.74 payable to MGT of America issued. (ni) (Entered: 10/17/2001)

8068

ORDER approving the report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds for the year starting July 1, 1996. The clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $27,500.00 for expenses incurred during the months of October, November and December, 2001. HCST shall submit an expense report by 1/7/02 detailing how the funds advanced have been used. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/17/2001)

8069 LETTER submitting invoice in the amt of $609,292.25 for services rendered by ASEM for the first, second and third dosis of Hepatitis B, during the period of August, 1998 and August 1999, by Adm. de Servicios Medicos de PR w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 10/23/2001)

8070 CHECK # 2523517 in the amount of $ 27,500 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2001)

8071 MOTION for disbursement of funds in the amt of $1,906,074 to the Civil Action and Education Corporation, (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2001)

8072 OPPOSITION to defts' third request for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2001)

8073 ORDER for payment of services to Health Department of P.R. in the amt of $609,292.25 for payment of first, second and third doses of Hepatitis B done August 1998 and August 1999. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2001)

8074 LETTER submitting invoice #9676 in the amt of $152,140.54 for professional fees for September 2001 (payment #9), w/attach, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 10/25/2001)

8075 ORDER the Clerk of the Court is to issue a check in the amt of $1,906.074 payable to Civil Action and Education Corp. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 10/26/2001)

8076 CHECK # 2523531 in the amount of $ 609,292.25 payable to Health Dept of PR issued (ni) (Entered: 10/29/2001)

8077 CHECK # 2523535 in the amount of $ 1,906,074.00 payable to Civil Action & Education Corp. issued (ni) (Entered: 10/29/2001)

8078 DESIGNATION of Manuel A. Rodriguez Banchs, Esq. as alternate lead counsel during absence of Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Esq. from 10/29/01 to 11/5/01. (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

8079 ORDER re: dkt #8040. The Court will await pltfs' counsel's imput before consulting releasing the funds requested. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

8080 ORDER noting dkt #8041 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

8081 ORDER noting dkt #8042. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

8082 ORDER noting and granting dkt #8065. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 346 of 513

10/30/2001 10/30/2001 10/30/2001 10/30/2001 10/31/2001 11/01/2001 11/07/2001 11/07/2001
11/21/2001 11/21/2001
11/21/2001
11/21/2001
11/26/2001 11/26/2001
11/26/2001 11/28/2001 11/28/2001 11/29/2001
11/29/2001 11/29/2001
11/29/2001 11/29/2001

8083 ORDER noting dkt #8066. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)
8084 INVOICE # PAC−2001−3 in the amt of $233,333.10 for Tuition of the Third Section of Vocational Training in 11 Penal Institutions. (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)
8085 ORDER approving dkt #8084. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2001)
8086 MOTION req. S/C, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2001)
8087 ORDER granting dkt #8074. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2001)
8088 CHECK # 2523547 in the amount of $ 233,333.10 payable to Prodecen, Inc. issued (ni) (Entered: 11/05/2001)
8089 INVOICE #12/01 from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. in the amount of $17,143.00 for consulting services during the month of September, 2001. (ni) (Entered: 11/07/2001)
8090 ORDER directing the payment to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. in the amt of $17,143.00 for consulting services during the month of September, 2001, Invoice #12/01. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/07/2001)
8091 CHECK # 2523568 dated 11/9/01 in the amount of $ 17,143.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 11/26/2001)
8092 MOTION submitting bi−monthly Progress Report for the Rio Piedras Correctional Complex in compliance with order of 12/17/92, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/26/2001)
8093 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of September, 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/26/2001)
8094 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of October, 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/26/2001)
8095 CHECK # 2523552 dated 11/2/01 in the amount of $ 152,140.54 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 11/26/2001)
8096 INVOICE #13/01 dated 11/5/01 from Curnyn Consulting for professional services rendered during the month of October, 2001 in the amt of $38,740.50 w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 11/26/2001)
8097 ORDER approving dkt #8096. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/26/2001)
8098 INVOICE #9728 for professional fees for October, 2001 (Payment #10), w/attachments, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2001)
8098 INFORMATIVE motion by Nestor Ayala Serrano pro se stating that he is a mental patient and req. to be placed in an alternate institution. (ni) (Entered: 11/30/2001)
8099 INVOICE # 15221 for professional services rendered during the months of Sept. and Oct. covering transactions for the month of August, 2001 in the amt of $2,300.00, by Vila del Corral & Co. (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2001)
8100 ORDER granting dkt #8099. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2001)
8101 INVOICE # 15376 for professional services rendered during the month of October covering transactions for the month of September, 2001 in the amt of $2,300.00, by Vila del Corral & Co. (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2001)
8102 ORDER granting dkt #8101. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2001)
8103 CHECK # 2523590 in the amount of $ 38740.50 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 11/30/2001)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 347 of 513

12/03/2001 12/04/2001 12/04/2001 12/07/2001 12/12/2001 12/13/2001
12/18/2001
12/21/2001 12/26/2001
12/26/2001
01/03/2002
01/08/2002 01/08/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002

8104 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for All Plaintiffs by Ricardo Alfonso−Garcia (ni) (Entered: 12/05/2001)
8105 CHECK # 2523592 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 12/06/2001)
8106 CHECK # 2523593 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 12/06/2001)
8107 REPORT on various proposals for funds and declining to recommend at this time the approval of any proposal whatsoever, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2001)
8108 DESIGNATION of Manuel A. Rodriguez Banchs, Esq. as alternate lead counsel, by pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 12/14/2001)
Transmitted Supplemental Record on Appeal: [7999−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan (dkts #373,868,869,1959,2465,3783,3784, 4156,6091,6093,6534,6551,6558,6559,6565,6567,6584,6590,6597 , 6615,6620,6627,6673,6720,6737,6814,6819,6830,6845,6855,6881 , 6976,7074,7292,7430,7490,7563,7573,7646,7783,7839,7849,7855 , 7856,7863,7868,7870,7876,7889,7971,8026,8063) (ni) (Entered: 12/18/2001)
8109 MOTION for order to hold defts in contempt of court or unilaterally terminating the FRP program and office in violation of the court's orders, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 12/19/2001)
Transmitted Supplemental Record on Appeal: [7999−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan (dkt #7846 − transcript) (ni) (Entered: 01/08/2002)
8110 MOTION for prospective injunctive relief for failure to deliver adequate food services to members of the pltf class in violation of their constitutional rights, w/attach, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 01/08/2002)
8111 OPPOSITION to pltfs motion for contempt and req. for extension of time until 1/28/02 to file memorandum in support, by govt defts, except Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 01/08/2002)
8112 Report on the use of find funds for the trimester covering the months of October, November and December, 2001, w/ attach, by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (ni) (Entered: 01/08/2002)
8113 INVOICE #9823 for professional fees for November 2001 (payment #11), in the amt of $158,517.50, w/attach, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 01/09/2002)
8114 RESPONSE to deft's opp. to pltfs' mot for contempt and req. for ext. of time to file memo in support, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 01/09/2002)
8115 ORDER mooting dkt #8086. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8116 ORDER ap−proving dkt #8098 for payment of invoice. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8117 ORDER noting dkt #8104. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8118 ORDER noting dkt #8107. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8119 ORDER mooting dkt #8108. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8120 ORDER granting dkt #8111. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8121 ORDER approving report (dkt #8112) of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds for the year starting 7/1/96 in the amt of $27,500. for expenses incurred during the months of January, February and March, 2002, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 348 of 513

01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/10/2002 01/14/2002 01/14/2002 01/14/2002 01/14/2002 01/14/2002 01/14/2002 01/14/2002 01/16/2002 01/22/2002 01/22/2002 01/22/2002 01/28/2002 01/28/2002 01/29/2002 01/29/2002 01/30/2002

8122 INVOICE #14/01 for professional services rendered during the month of November, 2001 in the amt of $38,598.00, w/attachments, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8123 ORDER approving dkt #8122. Clerk shall issue in the amt of $38,598.00 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2002)
8124 CHECK # 2523698 in the amount of $ 27,500.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8125 CHECK # 2523699 in the amount of $ 38,598.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8126 ORDER approving dkt #8113. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8127 REPORT of Evaluation on Services of Emergency − Ambulatory − Infirmary for June, 1999, from the Office of the Chief Health Care Coordinator. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8128 REPORT of Re−Evaluation on Services of Emergency − Ambulatory − for March, 2000, from the Office of the Chief Health Care Coordinator. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8129 REPORT of Evaluation on Services of Admissions, Emergency, Ambulatory, Infirmary, Extensive Care for April, 1999, from the Office of the Chief Health Care Coordinator. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8130 REPORT of Re−Evaluation of Ambulatory Services of the Penitenciary, District of Arecibo, for the month of September, 2000, from the Office of the Chief Health Care Coordinator. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8131 REPORT of Re−Evaluation on Ambulatory Services for the Corrections Institution at Jayuya, for the month of June 2000, from the Office of the Chief Health Care Coordinator. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8132 REPORT of Re−Evaluation of Ambulatory Services − of the Correctional Insitution at Juana Diaz, for the month of September, 2000, from the Office of the Chief Health Care Coordinator. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2002)
8133 OPPOSITION to pltfs motion for prospective injunctive relief in regard to food services and req. for ext of time until 2/15/02 to file memo in support thereof, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 01/17/2002)
8134 INVOICE #9885 in the amt of $157,768.09 for professional fees for December 2001 (payment #12), by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 01/23/2002)
8135 CHECK # 252711 in the amount of $ 158,517.50 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 01/25/2002)
8136 CHECK # 2523708 in the amount of $ 164,940.22 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 01/25/2002)
8137 MEMORANDUM in opposition to pltfs' motion for contempt, by govt defts, except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 01/29/2002)
8138 MOTION for extension of time for 1 day to file exhibits to attach to dkt #8137, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 01/29/2002)
8139 MOTION SUBMITTING exhibits to attach to memo in support of opp to pltfs' motion for contempt, w/attachment, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 01/30/2002)
8140 MOTION SUBMITTING FRP quarterly report of September, 2001, w/attachment, by Secretary of the Dept. of Corrections and Rehab. and Administrator of the Adm. of Corrections of the Commonwealth of PR. (ni) (Entered: 01/30/2002)
8141 MOTION under Local Rule 108 to accept exhibits attached to opp to mot for contempt in the Spanish language, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 349 of 513

02/05/2002 02/05/2002 02/05/2002 02/05/2002 02/05/2002
02/05/2002 02/06/2002
02/11/2002 02/12/2002 02/13/2002 02/13/2002 02/13/2002 02/13/2002 02/20/2002
02/20/2002
02/20/2002
02/20/2002 02/20/2002 02/25/2002 03/01/2002
03/08/2002

(Entered: 02/07/2002)
8142 ORDER mooting dkt #8138. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
8143 ORDER noting dkt #8139. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
8144 ORDER noting dkt #8140. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
8145 ORDER approving dkt #8134. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
8146 INVOICE #1/02 for professional services rendered during the month of December, 2001 in the amt of $33,046.00, by Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
8147 ORDER approving for payment dkt #8146. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
8148 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 02/07/2002)
8149 MINUTES of Setting: set Status Conference for 2:00 2/20/02 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ni) (Entered: 02/12/2002)
8150 CHECK # 2523815 in the amount of $ 33,046.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
8151 ORDER noting dkt #8148. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
8152 ORDER noting dkt #8114. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
8153 Report of revaluation of emergency services, Correctional Facility of Guayama. (ni) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8153. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/13/2002)
8154 INVOICE #15528 dated 12/18/01 from Vila del Corral & Co. for professional services rendered during the Month of November, 2001 in the amt of $2,300.00. (ni) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
8155 INVOICE #15579 dated 1/10/02 from Vila del Corral & Co. for professional services rendered during the Month of December, 2001 in the amt of $2,300.00. (ni) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
8156 MOTION for additional extension of time to file memo in support of opp to pltfs mot for prospective injunctive relief in regard to food services, by govt defts except the Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
8157 MOTION to compel production of document, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 02/21/2002)
Status Conference held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (ni) (Entered: 03/26/2002)
8158 INVOICE #9992 for professional fees for January 2002 (Payment #13) in the amt of $145,641.50 from MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 02/26/2002)
8159 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 03/04/2002)
8160 ORDER noting dkt #8159. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/08/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 350 of 513

03/08/2002 03/08/2002
03/08/2002
03/08/2002 03/11/2002 03/11/2002
03/11/2002 03/11/2002 03/13/2002 03/14/2002 03/14/2002 03/15/2002 03/18/2002 03/18/2002 03/19/2002 03/19/2002 03/19/2002 03/20/2002 03/20/2002 03/20/2002

8161 ORDER granting dkt #8156 up to and including 3/18/02. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/08/2002)
8162 ORDER granting dkt #8154 for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. to pay Invoice No. 15528 in the amt of $2,300.00 covering services provided in November, 2001 in relation to the acct month of October, 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/08/2002)
8163 ORDER granting dkt #8155 for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. to pay Invoice No. 15579 in the amt of $2,300.00 covering services provided in December, 2001 in relation to the acct month of November, 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/08/2002)
8164 ORDER approving dkt #8158 Payment to MGT of America in the amt of $145,641.50, Invoice #9992 for professional fees for January, 2002. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/08/2002)
8165 INVOICE #2/02 dated 2/4/02 for professional services rendered during the month of January, 2002 in the amt of $35,680.00 from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 03/11/2002)
8166 ORDER granting dkt #8165 for payment of Invoice #2/02 from Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for professional services rendered during the month of January, 2002 in the amt of $35,680.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/11/2002)
8167 CHECK # 2524047 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2002)
8168 CHECK # 2524048 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2002)
8185 CHECK # 2524049 in the amount of $ 145,641.50 payable to M.G.T. of America issued (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)
8169 MOTION for leave to allow pltfs to photograph or videotape AOC facilities on 24 hour notice, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 03/18/2002)
8170 DESIGNATION of atty Manuel A. Rodriguez Banchs as lead counsel during absence of atty Carlos Garia Gutierrez from 3/15 thru 3/19/02, by pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 03/18/2002)
8171 ORDER for investment transaction with Santander Securities, Inc. in the amt of $9,978,586.53, etc. as stated herein. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/18/2002)
8172 INVOICE #3/02 for professional services during the month of February 2002 in the amt of $32,962.00 by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 03/18/2002)
8173 ORDER granting dkt #8172. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/18/2002)
8174 CHECK # 2524075 in the amount of $ 9,978,586.53 payable to Santander Securities issued (ni) (Entered: 03/19/2002)
8175 CHECK # 2524069 in the amount of $ 35,680.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting issued (ni) (Entered: 03/19/2002)
8176 CHECK # 2524081 in the amount of $ 32,681.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 03/20/2002)
8177 ORDER noting dkt #8170. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/20/2002)
8178 ORDER granting dkt #8169. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/20/2002)
8179 MOTION submitting Invoice #25 from Nancy I. Boneta Lopez for consulting services for the months from August, 2001 thru February, 2002 in the amt of $33,600.00 w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 03/21/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 351 of 513

03/22/2002 03/26/2002
03/26/2002 03/26/2002 03/26/2002 03/26/2002 03/27/2002 03/27/2002 03/27/2002 03/27/2002 03/27/2002 03/27/2002 04/02/2002 04/02/2002 04/03/2002 04/04/2002 04/04/2002 04/04/2002 04/04/2002

8180 MOTION and memorandum of law regarding confidentiality of the Adkins & Co. Report, w/attach, by govt defts, except the Dept of Health and its Secretary. (ni) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

8181

REPORT. S/C held ON 2/20/02. Defts are grtd 20 days to ans. the mot to compel. The hearing on pltfs' req. for prospective relief anent FRP and food services originally set for 4/8/02 is continued for 4/11/02 at 9:00 AM. Meeting will be held in June with the Secretary of the Dept of Correction and Rehab. to discuss the various proposals subm. req. monies from the fine fund. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/26/2002)

8182 MINUTES of Setting: set Status Conference for 12:00 4/3/02 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ni) (Entered: 03/26/2002)

8183 INVOICE #10078 for professional fees for February 2002 (payment #14) in the amt of $152,501.23, w/attach, by MGT of America, Inc. (ni) (Entered: 03/26/2002)

8184 ORDER for payment of services to Vial del Corral & Co. in the amt of $2,300 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8186 ORDER for payment of services to Vila del Corral & Co. in the amt of $2,300 for the month of December 2001. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8187 CHECK # 2524094 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8188 CHECK # 2524095 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral & Co. issued (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8189 MOTION IN COMPLIANCE with Paragraph 56 of the STIPULATION regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of Feb 2002 and req for leave to file in Spanish by Government Defendants. (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8190 FIFTY−FOURTH PROGRESS Report for the Rio Piedras Correctional Complex for the period of October−December 2001 by Government Defendants. (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8191 MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH Paragraph 56 of the STIPULATION regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of December 2001 and req for leave to file in Spanish by Government Defendants (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8192 MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH Paragraph 56 of the STIPULATION regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of January 2002 and req for leave to file in Spanish by Government Defendants (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8193 ORDER for payment of services of Nancy I. Boneta Lopez for the months of August−December 2001 and Jan−Feb 2002 in the amt of $33,600 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8194 ORDER for the payment of MGT of America in the amt of $152,501.23 for the month of Feb 2002 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

8195 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for All Plaintiffs by Lillian N. Miranda−Rodriguez (ni) (Entered: 04/04/2002)

8196 ORDER noting dkts #8189, 8190, 8191 and 8192. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/04/2002)

8197 ORDER referring dkt #8180 to Mag. Gelpi for his consideration and resolution. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/04/2002)

8198 INVOICE # PAC−2001−4 in the amt of $337,036.70 for courses provided to inmates during 1/15/02 until 5/2/02, by PRODECEN, INC. (ni) (Entered: 04/04/2002)

8199 ORDER approving dkt #8198 and for clerk to pay said invoice. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/04/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 352 of 513

04/04/2002 04/04/2002 04/05/2002
04/05/2002 04/05/2002 04/08/2002 04/09/2002
04/09/2002 04/12/2002 04/17/2002 04/18/2002 04/18/2002 04/22/2002 04/23/2002 04/24/2002 04/25/2002
04/25/2002 05/03/2002 05/07/2002 05/07/2002

8200 MOTION req. copy of report of MGT of America, Inc., by all govt defts except the Dept of Health and its Secretary. (ni) (Entered: 04/05/2002)

8201 REPORT on the use of fine funds for the trimester covering the months of January, February and March, 2002, w/attach, by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. (ni) (Entered: 04/05/2002)

8202 ORDER setting hearing and oral argument on defts' motion, dkt #8180. Pltfs are grtd until 4/23/02 to respond to said motion, etc. set General Calendar Call for 10:00 4/25/02 before Magistrate Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi ( signed by Magistrate Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi ) (ni) (Entered: 04/05/2002)

8203 URGENT motion to consolidate hearings on FRP and Kitchens and hold the hearing on 7/8/02, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 04/05/2002)

ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #8203. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/05/2002)

8204 CHECK # 2524163 in the amount of $ 33,600 payable to Nancy I. Boneta issued (ni) (Entered: 04/09/2002)

8205

ORDER approving report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad (dkt #8201) and authorizing advancement of fine funds in the amt of $27,500 for expenses incurred during the months of April, May and June, 2002. Further, the staff of HCST shall submit by the 7/5/02 an expense report detailing how the funds have been used, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/09/2002)

8206 CHECK # 2524177 in the amount of $ 337,036.70 payable to PRODECEN, INC. issued (ni) (Entered: 04/11/2002)

8207 CHECK # 2524181 in the amount of $ 27,500.00 payable to Hogar Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 04/17/2002)

8208 ORDER noting and granting dkt #8092; noting dkt #8093 and noting dkt #8094. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/17/2002)

8209 CHECK # 2524162 in the amount of $ 152,501.23 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 04/19/2002)

8210 RESPONSE to defts' mot req. copy of report of MGT of America, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 04/22/2002)

8211 INVOICE #10149 in the amt of $165,548.01 for professional fees for March 2002 (payment #15), w/attach, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 04/23/2002)

8212 RESPONSE to defts' motion and memo of law regarding confidentiality of the Adkins & Co. Report, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2002)

8213 LETTER notifying change of address, by Modeso Crisoptimo pro se in the Spanish language. (ni) (Entered: 05/03/2002)

8214 Minute entry: Oral Arguments hearing held. Atty Sanchez Betances req. that the Exposure Analysis by Adkins & Co. filed in open court be sealed. Arguments heard and matter taken under advisement. ( Magistrate Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi ) (ni) (Entered: 05/03/2002)

8215 EXPOSURE analysis by Adkins & Company, Inc. on the Rehabilitation of Annex 504 State Penitentiary, Rio Piedras, December 2000. (ni) (Entered: 05/03/2002)

8216 ORDER for defts to provide copy of the Adkins Report to counsel for pltfs. Said copy shall be part of the record, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Magistrate Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi ) (ni) (Entered: 05/03/2002)

8217 DESIGNATION of Manuel Rodriguez Banch as alternate lead counsel for pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 05/08/2002)

8218 MOTION req. court order prohibiting reprisals against witnesses, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 05/08/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 353 of 513

05/08/2002 05/09/2002
05/09/2002
05/09/2002
05/13/2002 05/13/2002 05/13/2002 05/15/2002
05/17/2002
05/17/2002
05/17/2002 05/22/2002 05/23/2002 05/23/2002 05/28/2002 05/31/2002
06/06/2002 06/10/2002 06/10/2002 06/12/2002 06/12/2002

8219 INVOICE # 5/02 in the amt of $37,024.00 for expenses during the month of April 2002, by Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 05/09/2002)
8220 ORDER granting dkt #8219 for the Clerk to issue check in the amt of $37,024.00 to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/09/2002)
8221 INVOICE AO271200 in the amt of $349,246.00 for courses offered to students at the Correctional submitted by Sistema Universitario Ana G. Mendez. (ni) (Entered: 05/09/2002)
8222 ORDER granting dkt #8221 for payment of invoice AO271200 in the amt of $349,246.00 for courses offered to students at the Correctional submitted by Sistema Universitario Ana G. Mendez. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/09/2002)
8223 Report on expenses for the fiscal year 1998−1999, 1999−2000 y 2000−2001, w/attach, by Medical Cadre. (ni) (Entered: 05/13/2002)
8224 ORDER noting dkt #8217. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/13/2002)
8225 ORDER prohibiting reprisals against witnesses re: dkt #8218. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/13/2002)
8226 Minute entry authorizing Mag. Gelpi to sign the orders for payment of invoices to MGT of America and Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/15/2002)
8227 ORDER the Clerk of the Court is to issue check in the amt of $33,995 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the month of March 2002. ( signed by Magistrate Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi for Judge Juan M. Perez Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 05/17/2002)
8228 ORDER approving #8211 the Clerk of the Court to issue check in the amt of $165,548.01 payable to MGT of America for March 2002 ( signed by Magistrate Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi ) (np) (Entered: 05/17/2002)
8226 INVOICE #4/02 from Curnyn Consulting for prof. services during the month of March, 2002 in the amt of $33,995.00. (ni) (Entered: 05/21/2002)
8229 CHECK # 2548607 in the amount of $ 349,246.00 payable to Sistema Universitario issued (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2002)
8230 CHECK # 2548614 in the amount of $ 37,024.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting issued (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2002)
8231 CHECK # 2548615 in the amount of $ 33,995.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting issued (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2002)
8232 MOTION to compel production of documents w/attach, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2002)
8233 MOTION submitting quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce Pilot Project covering the period of March 31, 2001 and for leave to file documents in the Spanish language, by govt defts w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 06/03/2002)
8234 INVOICE #10238 for professional fees for April 2002 in the amount of $145,247.89, w/attach, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 06/10/2002)
8235 MOTION to set aside order of 5/9/02, by govt defts except the Dept of Health and its Secretary. (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2002)
8236 MOTION to set aside order consolidating hearings, by govt defts except the Dept of Health and its Secretary. (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2002)
ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #8233. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2002)
8237 ORDER approving dkt #8234. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 354 of 513

06/14/2002
06/14/2002 06/14/2002
06/14/2002 06/14/2002 06/14/2002 06/14/2002
06/17/2002 06/17/2002 06/17/2002 06/17/2002 06/18/2002 06/18/2002 06/18/2002 06/18/2002 06/19/2002 06/19/2002 06/19/2002 06/20/2002 06/24/2002 06/24/2002 06/25/2002

8238 INVOICE #16212 filed on 5/23/02 in the amt of $2,300.00 for professional services rendered during the month of April 2002 covering transactions for the month of March 2002, by Vila del Corral. (ni) Modified on 06/14/2002 (Entered: 06/14/2002)
8239 ORDER granting dkt #8238. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/14/2002)
8240 INVOICE #16029 filed on 4/23/02 in the amt of $2,300.00 for professional services rendered during the month of March 2002 covering transactions for the month of February 2002, by Vila del Corral. (ni) Modified on 06/14/2002 (Entered: 06/14/2002)
8241 ORDER granting dkt #8240. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/14/2002)
8242 OPPOSITION to deft's motion to set aside order of 5/9/02, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2002)
8243 OPPOSITION to deft's motion to set aside order consolidating hearing, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2002)
8244 DESIGNATION of atty Manuel A. Rodriguez Banchs as alternate lead counsel for pltfs during absence of atty Carlos Garcia Gutierrez from 6/14 thru 6/18/02. (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2002)
8245 ORDER granting dkt #8232. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2002)
8246 ORDER denying dkt #8235. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2002)
8247 INVOICE #6/02 for professional services incurred during the month of May, 2002 in the amt of $33,044.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2002)
8248 ORDER approving dkt #8247. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2002)
8249 CHECK # 2548608 in the amount of $ 165,548.01 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 06/18/2002)
8250 CHECK # 2548695 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 06/19/2002)
8251 CHECK # 2548696 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 06/19/2002)
Reply to opp to mot to set aside order consolidating hearing tendered, by govt defendants except the Dept of Health and its Secretary (ni) (Entered: 06/19/2002)
8252 ORDER noting dkt #8244. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/19/2002)
8253 ORDER granting dkt #8243. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/19/2002)
8254 ORDER granting dkt #8242. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/19/2002)
8256 MOTION to strike reply to opp to mot to set aside order consolidating hearing, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 06/24/2002)
8255 MOTION req. reconsideration of order garding payment to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd, by equitable defts. (ni) (Entered: 06/24/2002)
8257 CHECK # 2548712 in the amount of $ 33,044.00 payable to Curnyn Cosulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 06/25/2002)
8258 INVOICE #16479 in the amt of $2,300 for professional services rendered during the month of May 2002 covering transactions for the month of April 2002, by Vila del Corral. (ni) (Entered: 06/25/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 355 of 513

06/26/2002 06/28/2002 06/28/2002 06/28/2002 07/01/2002
07/01/2002 07/01/2002 07/02/2002 07/02/2002 07/03/2002 07/09/2002 07/09/2002
07/09/2002 07/09/2002 07/10/2002 07/15/2002 07/15/2002
07/15/2002 07/17/2002

8259 CHECK # 2548737 in the amount of $ 4,035,000.00 payable to Santander Securities issued (ni) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

8260 ORDER granting dkt #8258. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

8261 ORDER granting dkt #8256. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/28/2002)

8262 CHECK # 2548693 in the amount of $ 145,247.89 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 07/01/2002)

8263

ORDER re: dkt #8255: denying req. to set aside the order entered at dkt #8248 regarding payment to Curnyn for services rendered during May 2002; Curnyn Consulting shall notify its stmt of services for the month of May 2002 to the parties; and for defts to submit within 10 days any motion related to said services with the court. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/01/2002)

8264 MOTION to request an order for disbursement of funds in the amt of $2,517,939.58 to finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation's operations during its fiscal year 2002−2003, by its President. (ni) (Entered: 07/02/2002)

8265 MOTION for writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 07/02/2002)

8266 CHECK # 2548752 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to Vila del Corral issued (ni) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

8267 MOTION submitting FRP quarterly report of December 2001, w/attach, by Secretary of the Dept. of Corrections and Rehab. and Adm. of Corrections of Commonwealth of PR. (ni) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

8268 Report on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the mos. of April, May and June 2002 by Hogar Catolico w/attach. (re) (Entered: 07/08/2002)

8269 ORDER granting docket 8264 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (yr) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

8270 Minute entry: Hearing called on the FRP and the conditions of the kitchens (dkts #7956, 7969, 2109, 8111, 8137). Parties req. a week to cont. conversations to resolve issues. Parties grtd until 7/16/02 to reach agreement. Court Reporter: B. Vazquetelles ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8271 CHECK # 2548804 in the amount of $ 2,517,939.58 payable to Civil Action and Education Corporation issued. (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8269 ORDER for clerk to issue check in the amt of $2,517,939.58 payable to Civil Action and Education Corporation. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8271 ORDER granting dkt #8265. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) Modified on 08/28/2002 (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8271 COMPLIANCE PLAN, by parties. (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8271

ORDER approving report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds. Clerk shall issue check in the amt of $27,500.00 as an advancement for expenses to be incurred during the month of July, August and September, 2002, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8271 CHECK # 2548822 in the amount of $ 27,500.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8272 Minute entry: Further hearing held on FRP and kitchen conditions. The court will visit two institutions on 7/19/02, etc. as stated herein Court Reporter: Vazquetelles (Clerk) (yr) (Entered: 07/17/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 356 of 513

07/24/2002 07/30/2002 07/30/2002 07/30/2002 07/30/2002 07/31/2002 08/05/2002 08/06/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/12/2002 08/21/2002 08/26/2002 08/26/2002 09/10/2002 09/10/2002
09/10/2002 09/10/2002
09/11/2002 09/11/2002

8273 INVOICE #10359 in the amount of $155,240.06 for professional fees for May 2002, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 07/26/2002)

8274 ORDER mooting dkt #8133. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/30/2002)

8275 ORDER granting dkt #8157. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/30/2002)

8276 ORDER approving dkt #8273. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/30/2002)

8277 Printed OPINION from USCCA dated 7/15/02 re: [7999−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan dismissing the appeal. (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

ENDORSED ORDER mooting [8236−1] motion to set aside order consolidating hearings. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

8278 MOTION to submit joint draft order on the compliance plan, w/attach, by parties. (ni) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

8279 DESIGNATION of atty Manuel A. Rodriguez Bachs as alternate lead counsel from 8/6/02 thru 8/11/02 , by pltfs' counsel Carlos Garcia Gutierrez. (ni) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

8280 CHECK # 2548892 in the amount of $ 155,240.06 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 08/15/2002)

8281 ORDER noting dkt #8279. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/15/2002)

8282 INVOICE #10466 for professional fees for June 2002 in the amount of $148,454.42, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 08/15/2002)

8283 ORDER approving compliance plan re: dkt #8278; amending order (dkt #5429), dismissing as moot dkts #7956, 7969, 8109, 8110, 8111, 8114 and 8133, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2002)

8284 INVOICE #10536 for professional fees for July 2002 in the amt of $149,981.41, by MGT of America, w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 08/27/2002)

8285 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of August 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2002)

8286 INVOICE #16702 for services rendered during July 2002 and covering transactions for June 2002 by RSM ROC & Co. (pka Vila del Corral) in the amt of $2,300.00 (ct) Modified on 09/11/2002 (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8287

ORDER FOR PAYMENT OF SERVICES TO RSM ROC & CO. granting [8286−1] INVOICE #16702 for services rendered during July 2002 and covering transactions for June 2002 by RSM ROC & Co. (pka Vila del Corral) in the amount of $2,300.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) Modified on 09/11/2002 (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8288 INVOICE #16587 for services rendered during June 2002 and covering transactions for May 2002 by RSM ROC & Co. (pka Vila del Corral) in the amt of $2,300.00 (ct) Modified on 09/11/2002 (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8289 ORDER granting dkt # 8288 INVOICE #16587 for services rendered during June 2002 and covering transactions for May 2002 by RSM ROC & Co. (pka Vila del Corral) in the amt of $2,300.00 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) Modified on 09/11/2002 (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8290 INVOICE #7/02 for professional services rendered on June 2002 by Curnyn Consulting in the amt of $30,400.00 (ct) Modified on 09/11/2002 (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8291 INVOICE #8/02 for professional services rendered on July 2002 by Curnyn Consulting in the amount of $18,928.00 (ct) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 357 of 513

09/11/2002 09/11/2002 09/11/2002 09/11/2002 09/11/2002 09/12/2002 09/12/2002
09/12/2002 09/12/2002 09/13/2002
09/13/2002 09/16/2002 09/16/2002 09/23/2002 09/23/2002 09/25/2002 09/25/2002 10/01/2002
10/01/2002 10/01/2002

8292 LETTER by Manuel Quilichini, Esq. stating that dkt #8290 (Curnyn's invoice #7/02) is incorrect and that the total amount for that month is $19,828.00 (ct) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8293 ORDER granting dkts #8090, 8091 and 8092 in the amount of $50,228.00, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8294 ORDER granting dkt #8284 (MGT's invoice #10536) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8295 ORDER granting #8282 (MGT's invoice #10466) ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

8296 ORDER denying #8200, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 09/11/2002)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt. #8210, Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (re) (Entered: 09/12/2002)

8297 ORDER re: mot. in compliance w/paragraph 56 of the Stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of August 2001 and req. for leave to file in Spanish (dkt. #8285), noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (re) (Entered: 09/12/2002)

8298 CHECK # 2549040 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to R S M Roc & Co. issued (sr) (Entered: 09/13/2002)

8299 CHECK # 2549039 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to R S M Roc & Co. issued (sr) (Entered: 09/13/2002)

8300

ORDER for investment transactions with Santander Securities in the total amount of $2,067,850.47 to be paid from check drawn from acct #501−00001−7 at Banco Santander of P.R. The semi−annual interest payments of $45,062.50 shall be paid to the Clerk by wire transfer each February 15th and August 15th beginning on 2/15/03 and ending on 8/15/12. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2002)

8301 CHECK # 2549045 in the amount of $ 50,228.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2002)

8302 CHECK # 2559064 in the amount of $ 2,067,850.47 payable to Santander Securities issued (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2002)

8303 MOTION suggesting GPR conferences with court, by Commonwealth defendants. (ni) (Entered: 09/18/2002)

8304 CHECK # 2549046 in the amount of $ 148,454.42 payable to MGT of AMERICA issued (ni) (Entered: 09/23/2002)

8305 CHECK # 2549047 in the amount of $ 149,981.41 payable to MGT of AMERICA issued (ni) (Entered: 09/23/2002)

8306 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 43 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/27/2002)

8307 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 43 regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 09/27/2002)

8308 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy), issued as informal mandate, Re: [0−0] supplemental appeal, [0−0] supplemental appeal, [0−0] number appeal, [0−0] recommendations appeal, [7999−1] appeal, [0−0] fee appeal dismissing the appeal for want of appellate jurisdiction. (ni) (Entered: 10/02/2002)

Record on Appeal returned from U.S. Court of Appeals: [7999−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan (ni) (Entered: 10/02/2002)

8309 INVOICE #10557 in the amount of $148,085.48 for professional fees for August 2002, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 10/02/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 358 of 513

10/02/2002 10/03/2002 10/07/2002 10/07/2002 10/08/2002 10/21/2002 10/21/2002 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 10/22/2002 10/22/2002
10/23/2002 10/24/2002 10/24/2002 10/24/2002 10/24/2002 10/25/2002
10/28/2002 10/28/2002 10/29/2002

8310 MOTION requesting funding pursuant to court order in the sum of $908,813.50, by deft Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 10/03/2002)

8311 INFORMATIVE motion req. an order to the Adm. of Corrections to reinstate the pltf in the general prison population, w/attach, by pltf Santiago Robles Santiago. (ni) (Entered: 10/04/2002)

8312 FIRST motion in compliance with order approving compliance plan, w/attachments, by govt defts except the Secretary and the Dept of Health. (ni) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

8313 MOTION requesting the use of fine funds, w/attachments, by all govt defts, except the Secretary and the Dept of Health. (ni) (Entered: 10/08/2002)

8314 Report re: use of find funds by the Hogar Catolica Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of July, August, and September, 2002 w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8267 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

8315 SECOND motion in compliance with order approving compliance plan, by all govt defts except the Secretary and the Dept of Health w/attachments. (ni) (Entered: 10/22/2002)

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8306. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/22/2002)

ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #8307. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/22/2002)

8316 ORDER approving 8309 for payment in the amt of $148,085.48 payable to MGT of America. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/22/2002)

8317 ORDER approving 8314 report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. The Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $30,000 as an advancement for the expenses incurred during the months of October, November and December, 2002, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/22/2002)

8318 CHECK # 2552937 in the amount of $ 30,000 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

8319 INVOICE #9/02 for the months of August and September, 2002 in the amt of $63,525.00 w/attachments, by Curnyn Consulting. (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

8320 ORDER approving #8319. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

8324 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for Plaintiffs class by Rafael E. Rodriguez−Rivera (ni) (Entered: 10/29/2002)

8325 OPPOSITION to mot req. the use of find funds, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 10/29/2002)

8322

ORDER re: 8321 MGT's detailed assessment reports of AOC's Infrastructure and Mgmt. MGT is hereby released as the Technical Advisor. Clerk is to file the originals of the reports. MGT is to provide copies to the parties. The parties are given 30 days to file any joint obj., etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/28/2002)

8321 REPORT from MGT of America re: Assessment of Administration of Corrections Inmate Management. 5 volumes dated March, June, July and (2) for September, 2002. (ni) (Entered: 10/28/2002)

8323 INVOICE #10707 in the amt of $2,031.16 for expenses incurred in the month of September 2002, w/attach, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 10/28/2002)

8326 INVOICE #16995 in the amt of $2,300.00 for professional services rendered during the month of August and September, 2002, by RSM ROC & Co. (cm) (Entered: 10/29/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 359 of 513

10/29/2002
10/29/2002 10/29/2002 10/30/2002
10/30/2002 11/01/2002 11/01/2002 11/04/2002 11/06/2002 11/06/2002 11/07/2002
11/12/2002 11/12/2002 11/13/2002
11/13/2002 11/18/2002
11/20/2002
11/27/2002 11/27/2002 11/27/2002 12/03/2002

8327 ORDER approving dkt #8326. Clerk shall issue check in the amt of $2,300.00 to RSM ROC & Co. formerly doing business as Vila del Corral. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 10/29/2002)
8328 INVOICE #16996 in the amt of $2,300.00 for professional services rendered during the month of September, 2002, by RSM ROC & Co. (cm) (Entered: 10/29/2002)
8329 ORDER approving dkt #8328 for Clerk to issue check in the amt of $2,300 to RSM ROC & Co. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 10/29/2002)
8330 ORDER approving dkt #8323 for payment of check in the amt of $2,031.16 payable to MGT of America for expenses incurred in September, 2002. (signed by Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/30/2002)
8331 CHECK # 2552964 in the amount of $ 63,525.00 payable to Curning Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 10/31/2002)
8332 CHECK # 2552972 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 11/04/2002)
8333 CHECK # 2552973 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 11/04/2002)
8334 THIRD MOTION in compliance with order approving compliance plan, w/attach, by all govt defts except the Secretary and the Dept of Health. (ni) (Entered: 11/06/2002)
8335 INVOICE # PAC−2002−1 dated 9/23/02 in the amt of $360,740.38 for the courses provided to members of the pltfs' class, by Prodecen, Inc. (ni) (Entered: 11/06/2002)
8336 ORDER approving dkt #8335. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/06/2002)
8337 MOTION submitting invoice #32 for consulting services provided during the months of March thru July and September, 2002, w/attach, by equitable defts. (ni) (Entered: 11/12/2002)
8338 CHECK # 2552960 dated 10/28/02 in the amount of $ 148,085.48 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 11/13/2002)
8339 CHECK # 2553010 in the amount of $ 2,031.16 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2002)
8340 RESPONSE to pltfs' opp. to deft's motion requesting the use of fine funds, by all govt defts except the Secretary of Health and the Department of Health. (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2002)
8341 CHECK # 2553046 in the amount of $ 360,740.38 payable to Prodesen, Inc. issued (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2002)
8342 FOURTH motion in compliance with order approving compliance plan and amended request for the use of fine funds, w/attachments, by all govt defts, except the Secretary and the Dept of Health (ni) (Entered: 11/20/2002)
8343 ORDER approving dkt #8337 and directing the clerk to issue a check in the amt of $9,900 from the fine funds under the court's control to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/20/2002)
8344 INVOICE #10/02 for services for the month of October, 2002 in the amt of $31,831.00, by Curnyn Consulting. (ni) (Entered: 11/27/2002)
8345 ORDER approving dkt #8344. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/27/2002)
8346 CHECK # 2553082 in the amount of $ 9,900.00 payable to Nancy I. Boneta issued (cm) (Entered: 12/03/2002)
8347 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of October, 2002 and req. for leave to file in Spanish language, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 12/04/2002)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 360 of 513

12/03/2002 12/03/2002
12/04/2002 12/05/2002 12/05/2002 12/06/2002 12/11/2002 12/11/2002 12/11/2002 12/11/2002 12/11/2002 12/11/2002 12/11/2002 12/16/2002 12/18/2002 12/19/2002 12/20/2002 12/27/2002
12/27/2002

8348 MOTION in compliance with Court Order of 12/17/92, submitting 57th progress report for the Rio Piedras Corr. Complex for the period 4/16 to 6/15/02, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 12/04/2002)
8349 MOTION in compliance with order dated 8/18/92 reg. the submission of quarterly accounting reports for the Ponce Pilot Project and for leave to file documents in Spanish language, covering the period of September 2002, by govt defts. (ni) Modified on 02/27/2003 (Entered: 12/04/2002)
8350 Joint Informative Motion in compliance with order re: MGT Report. (ni) (Entered: 12/05/2002)
8351 INVOICE # 17129 in the amt of $2,300 for professional services rendered during the month of October 2002 covering the month of September, 2002, by RSM ROC & Co. (ni) (Entered: 12/05/2002)
8352 CHECK # 2553151 in the amount of $ 31,831.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD. issued (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
8353 MOTION to inform change of address of the law firm Ramirez Lavandero & Associates, by co−deft Rafael Hernandez Colon in his personal capacity. (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt [8347−1] (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt [8348−1] ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt [8349−1] ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt [8350−1] ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
ENDORSED ORDER re: dkt #8342 for pltf to file w/in 30 days a motion advising their position in regards to paragraph 5 of this motion. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
8354 ORDER approving [8351−1] for payment of invoice #17129 in the amt of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
8355 ORDER for investment transaction with Santander Securities Inc. in amount of $27,651,848.79, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/11/2002)
8356 CHECK # 2553196 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to RSM Roc & Co. issued at USDC on 12/16/02 (cm) (Entered: 12/18/2002)
8357 EXTERNAL AUDIT Report of the Civil Action and Education Corporation for fiscal year 7/1/01 to 6/30/02. (np) (Entered: 12/20/2002)
8358 INVOICE of Nancy I. Boneta Lopez for the month of Oct 2002 in the amt of $7,500. (np) (Entered: 12/20/2002)
8359 ORDER the Clerk of the Court to issue check to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. in the amt of $42,561 for the month of Nov. 2002. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 12/20/2002)
8360 MOTION by the Government Defendants for Leave to File in Spanish the attachments to motion in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of November 2002 (cm) (Entered: 12/30/2002)
8360 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 56 of the stipulation reg. custodial and sociopenal staffing for the month of November 2002, by govt defts. (ni) (Entered: 02/10/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 361 of 513

12/30/2002 01/07/2003 01/09/2003 01/09/2003 01/09/2003 01/10/2003 01/15/2003 01/27/2003 01/27/2003 01/30/2003 01/30/2003 01/31/2003 02/04/2003 02/04/2003
02/04/2003 02/06/2003 02/06/2003
02/06/2003 02/06/2003 02/06/2003

8361 CHECK # 2553255 in the amount of $ 42,561.00 payable to Curning Consulting, LTD issued (cm) (Entered: 12/31/2002)

8362 Informative Motion notifying FMO Director is engineer Jimmy Grullon, by all govt defts except the Secretary and the Dept of Health. (ni) (Entered: 01/08/2003)

8363 INVOICE #1/03 dated 1/1/03 for professional services rendered in the amt of $37,293.00, by Curnyn Consulting Services (ni) (Entered: 01/09/2003)

8364 ORDER approving dkt #8363 for payment of invoice #1/03 to Curnyn Consulting in the amt of $37,293.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/09/2003)

8365 INVOICE #17373 for professional services rendered during the month of November, 2002 covering the month of October, 2002 in the amt of $2,300.00, by RSM ROC & Co. (ni) (Entered: 01/10/2003)

8366 OPPOSITION to defts' Sundry req. for fine funds, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 01/13/2003)

8367 CHECK # 2553306 in the amount of $ 37,293.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) Modified on 02/27/2003 (Entered: 01/22/2003)

8368 MOTION requesting approval of contract and funds, w/attach, by all govt defts except the Dept of Health and its Secretary. (ni) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

8369 MOTION concurring in the result of the motion requesting approval of contact and funds, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

8370 COPY OF JUDGMENT in Civil 99−1195 dismissing the case. Cases are no longer consolidated. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

8371 COPY OF JUDGMENT in Civil 99−2323 dismissing the case. Cases no longer consolidated. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

8372 LETTER/ MOTION re: violation of civil rights, by Daniel Dingui Ayalai pro se in the Spanish language. (ni) (Entered: 02/04/2003)

8373 ORDER approving dkt #8365 for payment of invoice #17373 in the amt of $2,300 to RSM ROC & Co. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/04/2003)

8374

ORDER for investment transactions with Santander Securities, Inc. in the total amount of $12,135,577.04. This amount will be paid from the proceeds on the sale of $12,450,080.59. The remaining balance on the proceeds of sale of $314,503.55 will be paid by Santander to the Clerk of Court, by wire transfer on 1/16/03, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/04/2003)

8375 INVOICE #17410 in the amt of $2,300.00 for professional services rendered during the month of December 2002, covering the month of November 2002, by RSM ROC. (ni) (Entered: 02/04/2003)

ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #8358 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/06/2003)

8376 ORDER approving the Correctional Health Services Corp. budget for 2003 natural year and transfer of operational budget funds for the first trimester of the year 2003 in the amount of $1,679,996, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/06/2003)

8377 ORDER for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300 covering services provided in December 2002 in relation to the acct month of November 2002. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/06/2003)

8378 Report re: use of funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of October, November, and December 2002. (ni) (Entered: 02/06/2003)

8379 CHECK # 2553432 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 02/10/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 362 of 513

02/10/2003 02/10/2003 02/10/2003 02/11/2003 02/12/2003
02/13/2003 03/03/2003 03/05/2003 03/05/2003 03/06/2003 03/07/2003 03/12/2003 03/12/2003 03/18/2003 03/18/2003 03/21/2003 03/25/2003 03/31/2003 03/31/2003 04/01/2003

ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8360A. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/10/2003)

8380 ORDER approving report [dkt #6283] of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds in the amt of $30,000, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/10/2003)

8381 Informative Motion re: change of address of atty Marcos A. Ramirez Lavandero. (ni) (Entered: 02/11/2003)

8383 CHECK # 2553517 in the amount of $ 30,000.00 payable to Hogar Santisima Trinidad issued by USDC/PR (cm) (Entered: 02/14/2003)

8382

ORDER to finance from fine funds the AOC's project for the implementation of the MGT Report. Defts will present to the court all vouchers submitted by MGT of America to the Adm. of Corrections for consulting services. The court authorizes an expenditure of up to $13.5 million on this acct to be spent only w/in the next 4 years, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 02/12/2003)

8384 CHECK # 2553536 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 02/19/2003)

8385 Informative Motion by atty Marcos Ramirez Lavander on behalf of co−deft Rafael Hernandez Colon re: new telephone number. (ni) (Entered: 03/04/2003)

8386 INVOICE #2/03 dated 2/4/03 for professional services rendered and personal expenses in the amt of $47,489.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 03/06/2003)

8387 ORDER approving dkt #8386. Clerk is to issue a check to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd in the amt of $47,489. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/06/2003)

8388 CHECK # 2843337 in the amount of $ 7,500.00 payable to Nancy I. Boneta issued (ni) (Entered: 03/07/2003)

8389 INVOICE #3/03 dated 3/4/03 for professional services rendered and personal expenses in the amount of $37,373.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 03/07/2003)

8390 INVOICE #17538 for professional services rendered during the month of January 2003, covering the month of December 2002 in the amt of $2,300.00, by RSM ROC & Co. (ni) (Entered: 03/12/2003)

8391 CHECK # 2843364 in the amount of $ 47,489.00 payable to Curning Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 03/13/2003)

8392 Statement from the Correctional Health Services Corp for the transfer of $398,435 to pay for the services rendered by Rosser Int'l. (ni) (Entered: 03/18/2003)

8393 ORDER granting dkt #8392 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/18/2003)

8394 CHECK # 2843405 in the amount of $ 398,434.00 payable to Correctional Health Services issued (ni) (Entered: 03/24/2003)

8395 INVOICE for professional fees for consulting services for January 2003 in the amt of $295,595.26 w/attach, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 03/27/2003)

8396 ORDER approving dkt #8389. Clerk to issue check in the amt of $37,373.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 03/31/2003)

8397 MOTION SUBMITTING exhibits from the Corrections Adm. in the Spanish language w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 04/01/2003)

8398 ORDER approving dkt #8395. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/01/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 363 of 513

04/01/2003 04/02/2003 04/03/2003 04/03/2003
04/07/2003 04/09/2003 04/15/2003 04/22/2003 04/22/2003
04/22/2003
04/22/2003
04/22/2003 04/24/2003
04/24/2003 04/28/2003 04/28/2003 04/29/2003 04/30/2003 05/01/2003 05/01/2003 05/06/2003

8399 INVOICE #4/03 for professional services during the month of March, 2003 in the amt of $58,298.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

8400 CHECK # 2843479 in the amount of $ 37,373.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

8401 ORDER approving dkt #8399. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/03/2003)

8402 Report by Hogar Catolico re: use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolica Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of January, February and March of 2003, w/attach. (yr) (Entered: 04/07/2003)

8403 CHECK # 2843501 dated 4/4/03 in the amount of $ 58,298.00 payable to Curning Consulting, Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 04/16/2003)

8404 REQUEST for extension of time to file response to defts' informative motion of 3/31/03, by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 04/16/2003)

8405 MOTION SUBMITTING invoice #39 in the amt of $1,700 for consulting services and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attachment (ni) (Entered: 04/16/2003)

ENDORSED ORDER granting [8405−1] miscellaneous ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

8406

ORDER approving [dkt #8402] report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds. Clerk shall issue check in the amt of $30,000 to HCST as an advancement for expenses incurred during the months of April, May and June, 2003, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

8407 ORDER for investment transaction with Santander Securities, Inc. in the total amount of $6,373,499.32, etc. as stated herein. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

8408 ORDER granting [dkt #8390] for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300.00 to pay Invoice #17538 to cover services provided in January 2003 in relation to the accounting month of December 2002. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/22/2003)

8409 CHECK # 2843498 in the amount of $ 295,595.26 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2003)

8410 INVOICE #PAC−2002−03−02 dated 2/5/03 in the amt of $502,088.40 for the courses provided to members of the pltfs' class, by Prodecen, Inc. (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2003)

8411 ORDER approving dkt #8410. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/24/2003)

8412 CHECK # 2843545 in the amount of $ 30,000 payable to Hogar Catolica Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 04/30/2003)

8413 CHECK # 2843551 in the amount of $ 502,088.40 payable to Prodecen, Inc. issued (ni) (Entered: 04/30/2003)

8414 CHECK # 2843548 in the amount of $ 5,070.00 payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez issued (ni) (Entered: 04/30/2003)

ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #8360 Noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 04/30/2003)

8415 INVOICE #17742 in the amount of $2,300 for professional services rendered during the month of February 2003, by RSM ROC & Co. (ni) (Entered: 05/01/2003)

8416 INVOICE #17853 in the amount of $2,300 for professional services rendered during the month of March 2003, by RSM ROC & Co. (ni) (Entered: 05/01/2003)

8417 INVOICE #5/03 for professional services rendered during the month of April, 2003 in the amt of $37,617.00, by Curnyn Consulting. (ni) (Entered: 05/07/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 364 of 513

05/07/2003 05/07/2003 05/14/2003
05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/14/2003 05/16/2003 05/21/2003 05/21/2003 05/21/2003
05/27/2003

8418 ORDER approving 8415 for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/07/2003)
8419 ORDER approving 8416 for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/07/2003)
8420 ORDER approving [#8417] directing the clerk to issue a check in the amt of $37,617.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting dkt #8303. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting dkt #8310. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8312. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting dkt #8313. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8315. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #8324. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8325. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8334. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8340. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8340. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8342. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8362. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8366. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8397. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8404. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/14/2003)
8421 CHECK # 2843659 in the amount of $ 37,617.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 05/19/2003)
8422 CHECK # 2843629 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM Roc & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 05/22/2003)
8423 CHECK # 2843630 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM Roc & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 05/22/2003)
8424 ORDER for the transfer of investments from Paine Webber of PR to Santander Securities, Inc. in the amt of $21,190,000 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/22/2003)
8425 Invoice #18075 in the amt of $2,300.00 for professional services rendered during the month of April 2003, by RSM ROC & Co. (cm) (Entered: 05/27/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 365 of 513

05/29/2003
05/29/2003
05/29/2003 05/29/2003 05/29/2003 06/02/2003 06/02/2003 06/03/2003
06/03/2003 06/04/2003 06/06/2003 06/06/2003 06/09/2003 06/10/2003 06/16/2003 06/18/2003 06/26/2003 06/26/2003 06/30/2003 07/03/2003 07/07/2003 07/07/2003

8426 ORDER for investment transaction with Santander Securities in the amt of $22,381,684.19, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2003)
8427 ORDER for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300.00 covering April 2003 in relation to the accounting month of March 2003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2003)
8428 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber of PR in the face value of $21,928,000 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 05/30/2003)
8429 INVOICE #11131 in the amount of $293,413.63 for consultation fees for the month of February, 2003, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 06/02/2003)
8430 INVOICE #11188 in the amount of $311,432.86 for consultation fees for the month of March, 2003, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 06/02/2003)
8431 CHECK # 2843546 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 06/03/2003)
8432 CHECK # 2843705 in the amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 06/03/2003)
8433 INVOICE #11256 for consulting services for the month of April in the amt of $308,976.66, by MGT of America. (ni) Modified on 08/13/2003 (Entered: 06/04/2003)
8434 INVOICE # 6/03 in the amt of $35,582.00 for services rendered by Curnyn Consulting LTD for the month of May 2003. (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2003)
8435 ORDER granting dkt #8434. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 06/04/2003)
8436 ORDER approving dkt #8430 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/06/2003)
8437 ORDER approving dkt #8429 ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (np) (Entered: 06/06/2003)
8438 MINUTES of Setting: set Status Conference for 2:00 6/16/03 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ni) (Entered: 06/10/2003)
8439 Proposal for Application of Funds for the year 2003−2004, w/attachments, by Hogar Santisima Trinidad. (ni) (Entered: 06/12/2003)
8440 MINUTES of Setting: set Status Conference for 10:00 7/11/03 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez (Clerk) (ni) (Entered: 06/17/2003)
8441 VOUCHER #11371 in the amount of $302,257.90 for professional fees covering the month of May 2003, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 06/19/2003)
8442 CHECK # 2843732 in the amount of $ 311,432.86 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 06/27/2003)
8443 CHECK # 2843733 in the amount of $ 293,413.63 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 06/27/2003)
8452 Invoice No. 18353 for professional services rendered during the month of May 2003, in the amt of $2,300.00 by RSM ROC & Company (cm) (Entered: 07/18/2003)
8444 CHECK # 2843730 in the amount of $ 35,582.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD. issued (cm) (Entered: 07/08/2003)
8445 Invoice PAC−2002−03−Verano in the amt of $19,779.24 by Prodecen, Inc. (cm) (Entered: 07/08/2003)
8446 Motion submitting invoice for consulting services for the months of Feb, March, April, and May 2003 in the amt of $17,775.00; and req for leave to file in Spanish. (cm) Modified on 07/08/2003 (Entered: 07/08/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 366 of 513

07/08/2003 07/09/2003 07/09/2003 07/10/2003 07/14/2003
07/15/2003 07/16/2003 07/17/2003 07/23/2003 07/23/2003 07/24/2003 07/24/2003 07/24/2003
07/29/2003 07/30/2003 07/30/2003 07/30/2003 08/11/2003 08/12/2003 08/12/2003

8447 Invoice #7/03 for professional services rendered during month of June 2003 in the amt of $34,627.00 by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (cm) Modified on 07/08/2003 (Entered: 07/08/2003)
8448 Motion in Spanish language by Rev. Elvin de la Torre Negron, pro se. (cm) Modified on 07/11/2003 (Entered: 07/11/2003)
8449 Motion req order to show cause why defts should not be held in contempt and req that ct payments to mgt be immediately suspended. (cm) (Entered: 07/11/2003)
8450 Reports on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of April, May, and June 2003. (cm) Modified on 07/11/2003 (Entered: 07/11/2003)
8451 ORDER for Sale of Investment instruments with Santander Securities, total proceeds of $6,095.00, on sale to be wired and deposited in A/C No.501−00001−7 at Bco Santander. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) Modified on 09/03/2003 (Entered: 07/15/2003)
8453 Motion seeking clarification of 8/27/97 court order (dkt #6642), by Deft Hon John Rullan. (cm) (Entered: 07/18/2003)
8454 Motion in Compliance w/paragraph 44 of the Stip regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and for leave to file in spanish. (cm) (Entered: 07/18/2003)
8455 Motion to req an order for disbursement of funds to finance the civil action and education corporation. (cm) (Entered: 07/22/2003)
8456 Motion withdrawing motions by all Govt defts, except Secy and Dept of Health. (cm) (Entered: 07/24/2003)
8460 INVOICE #18443 for professional services rendered during the month of June 2003 in the amt of $2,300.00 by RSM ROC & Co. (ni) (Entered: 07/28/2003)
8458 ORDER for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. for services provided in 5/03, Invoice #18353, granting [8452−1] remark ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 07/24/2003)
8459 ORDER for payment to Curnyn Consulting. Ltd, in the amt of $34,627.00 for services as consultant to the Correctional Health Services Corp. granting [8447−1] remark ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 07/24/2003)
8457 ORDER approving Report of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $30,000,00 as an advancement for the expenses to be incurred during the months of July, August and September 2003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 09/03/2003)
8461 ORDER approving the transfer of operational budget funds for the second trimester of the year 2003 to the Correctional Health Services Corp. in the amt of $1,039,443, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 07/29/2003)
8462 CHECK # 2843989 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2003)
8463 CHECK # 2843988 in the amount of $ 30,000 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad issued (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2003)
8464 CHECK # 2843987 in the amount of $ 34,827.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 07/31/2003)
8465 INVOICE #8/03 in the amount of $36,324.00 for professional services rendered, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 08/11/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #8456. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/12/2003)
8466 ORDER approving dkt #8445 and req. clerk to pay said invoice. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/12/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 367 of 513

08/14/2003 08/14/2003 08/19/2003 08/20/2003 08/20/2003 08/21/2003
08/21/2003 08/22/2003 08/28/2003 08/28/2003 08/28/2003
08/29/2003 09/02/2003 09/03/2003 09/05/2003 09/11/2003 09/25/2003 09/30/2003 10/01/2003

8467 INVOICE #11461 in the amount of $323,530.93 for professional services rendered covering the month of June 2003, w/ attachments, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 08/14/2003)
8468 ORDER for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amount of $2,300 covering the month of June 2003 in relation to the accounting month of May 2003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/19/2003)
8469 CHECK # 2558156 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC and Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 08/20/2003)
8470 ORDER granting dkt #8455. Clerk shall issue a check in the name of Civil Action and Education Corp. in the amt of $2,842,589.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/20/2003)
8471 CHECK # 2558130 in the amount of $ 19,779.24 payable to Prodecen, Inc. issued (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2003)
8472 ORDER approving the Correctional Health Services Corp. (CHSC) req. for budget transfer in the amount of $1,500,000.00 to account # 3003380156 to Banco Santander for CHSC's disbursement. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/21/2003)
8473 INVOICE #11537 in the amount of $316,239.16 for professional fees covering the month of July 2003, w/attachments, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 08/22/2003)
8474 CHECK # 2558187 in the amount of $ 2,842,589.00 payable to Civil Action and Education Corp issued (cm) (Entered: 08/25/2003)
8475 ORDER approving dkt #8465. Clerk shall issue check in the amount of $36,324.00 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2003)
8476 Request for transfer of operational budget funds for the third and fourth trimesters of the year 2003, by Correctional Health Services Corp. (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2003)
8477 ORDER approving dkt #8476. Clerk shall transfer the amount of $1,287,619 corresponding to the third trimester of fiscal year 2003 and $976,752 for the fourth trimester of fiscal year 2003 to the account number 3003380156 at Banco Santander, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 08/28/2003)
8478 INVOICE #18580 in the amount of $2,300 covering services provided in July 2003 in relation to the month of June, 2003, by RSM ROC & Co. (ni) (Entered: 09/02/2003)
8479 Designation of alternate lead counsel Manuel A. Rodriguez Banchs, Esq. during Carlos Garcia Gutierrez's absence from 8/29/03 through 9/11/03. (ni) (Entered: 09/03/2003)
8480 CHECK # 2558305 in the amount of $ 36,324.00 payable to Curning Consulting Ltd. issued (ni) (Entered: 09/08/2003)
8481 INVOICE #9/03 dated 9/2/03 for professional services rendered during the month of August, 2003 in the amt of $52,057.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni) (Entered: 09/08/2003)
8482 MOTION req. leave to w/d as legal counsel, by Iris Hernandez Castro on behalf of all govt defts except the Secretary and the Dept of Health. (ni) (Entered: 09/16/2003)
8483 REQUEST for intervention, by Luis R. Nieves Martinez pro se in the Spanish language. (ni) (Entered: 09/26/2003)
8484 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts except the Secretary and the Dept. of Health. (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2003)
ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #8482. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 368 of 513

10/01/2003 10/01/2003 10/01/2003 10/02/2003 10/02/2003 10/02/2003 10/05/2003 10/06/2003 10/08/2003 10/15/2003 10/16/2003 10/16/2003 10/17/2003 10/21/2003 10/23/2003 10/24/2003
10/24/2003 10/28/2003
10/28/2003 10/30/2003

8485 ORDER approving dkt #8433, payment of invoice #11256 to MGT of America in the amt of $308,976.66. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/01/2003)

8486 MOTION under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the Correctional Health Program of the Dept of Health, by John V. Rullan. w/attach. (ni) (Entered: 10/02/2003)

8487 MOTION req. time to submit translated documents to statement attached to dkt #8486, by Johnny Rullan. (ni) (Entered: 10/02/2003)

8488 INVOICE #10/03 for professional services during the month of September, 2003 in the amt of $44,619.00, by Curnyn Consulting. (ni) (Entered: 10/02/2003)

8489 ORDER approving dkts #8481 and 8488 and directing clerk to issue check in the amt of $96,676.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/02/2003)

8490 ORDER for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. invoice #18580 in the amt of $2,300 re: dkt #8478. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/03/2003)

8491 CHECK #2911312 issued to Curnyn Consulting LTD. in the amt of $96,676.00 for the month of August and September, 2003. (ni) (Entered: 10/07/2003)

8492 CHECK # 2911305 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. issued (ni) (Entered: 10/07/2003)

8493 INVOICE #11623A of August 2003 for professional fees in the amt of $325,178.02, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 10/08/2003)

8496 Report on the use of fine funds by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering the mos. of July, August and September 203 w/attach. (re) (Entered: 10/16/2003)

8494 Letter by Correctional Health Services Corp dtd 10/1/03 to req ct's approval of supuplementary budget req in the amt of $5,325,414. (ov) (Entered: 10/16/2003)

8495 ORDER granting [8494−1] remark ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ov) (Entered: 10/16/2003)

8497 MOTION to extend time until 10/23/03 to respond to motion under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer, by pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 10/21/2003)

8498 CHECK # 2911306 in the amount of $ 308,976.66 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 10/21/2003)

8499 INVOICE #11715 OF September, 2003 in the amount of $316,536.19, w/attachment, by MGT. (ni) (Entered: 10/23/2003)

8500 RESPONSE by pltfs in opposition to dfts' motion under PLRA to vacate order re: transfer and privatization of correctional health program AND pltfs' CROSS MOTION to modify and terminate the medical health plan (ct) (Entered: 10/24/2003)

8501 ORDER approving 8496 report by Father Pedro Gerena for the months of 7, 8 and 9 2003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ct) (Entered: 10/24/2003)

8502

ORDER approving the Correctional Health Services Corp. transfer of supplementary budget funds for the fourth trimester of the year 2003 in the amt of $4,000,000 to the acct number 3003380156 at Banco Santander. The remaining $1,325,414 shall be transferred to CHSC's account at a future date, etc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 10/28/2003)

8503 Motion regarding stay of Court ordered relief by Pltfs. (cm) (Entered: 10/30/2003)

8504 Invoice No. 18723 for services rendered during the month of 8/2003 in the amt of $2,300.00 by RSM ROC Co. (cm) (Entered: 10/30/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 369 of 513

10/30/2003 10/30/2003 10/30/2003 10/31/2003 11/03/2003 11/03/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003 11/04/2003
11/04/2003
11/05/2003 11/05/2003 11/05/2003 11/05/2003
11/06/2003

8505 Invoice #18823 for services rendered during the month of 9/2003 in the amt of $2,300.00 by RSM ROC, Co. (cm) (Entered: 10/30/2003)

8506 ORDER granting [8503−1] Motion req order postponing the operation of "Automatic Stay" for an additional 60 days. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 10/30/2003)

8507 ORDER Motion Hearing on deft John Rullan's Motion to vacate or terminate the Ct's relief set 11/4/03 9:30 before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 10/30/2003)

8508 Motion submitting translated documents to Statement of Hector J. Mena Franco by John V. Rullan (cm) (Entered: 11/03/2003)

8509 ORDER granting [8504−1] Inv. 1873 in the amt of $2,300.00 by RSM ROC & Co., for services provided in August 2003 in relation to the accounting for the month of July 2003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/04/2003)

8510 ORDER granting [8505−1] Invoice #18823 in the amt of $2,300.00 to RSM ROC & Co., covering services provided in September 2003 in relation to the accounting for the month of August 1003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/04/2003)

8511 ORDER granting [8441−1] Mgt of America's Invoice #11371−professional fees for consulting services & expenses May 2003 in the amt of $302,257.90. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/04/2003)

8512 ORDER granting [8467−1] Mgmt of America's Inv #11461−professional fees for consulting services covering the month of June 2003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/04/2003)

8513 NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL of [8506−1] order dated 10/31/03 by Johnny Rullan Appeal record due on 11/14/03 (cm) (Entered: 11/05/2003)

8514

NOTICE OF INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL of by Johnny Rullan as to order by Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez entered in open court on 11/4/03 requiring from appearing party that it immediately begin the presentation of evidence in support of its Motion under the PRLA to nullify or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the correctional health program. Appeal record due on 11/14/03 (cm) (Entered: 11/05/2003)

8516

Minute entry: Case called for hearing on deft Hon John A. Rullan's motion under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the ct relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the Correctional Health Program of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Arguments by cnsl are heard. Ct denies motion and states reasons for the record. Def cnsl files in open court a notice of appeal. Further hearing is continued until tomorrow. Court Reporter: Bo Vazquetelles ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/06/2003)

8515 TRANSCRIPT filed for Hearing on Motion before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/4/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 11/05/2003)

8517 Motion to Quash subpoenas for the production of documents pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P 45(C), by Correctional Health Services Corp (CHSC). (cm) (Entered: 11/06/2003)

8518 Informative Motion by deft Rullan re: CHSC (cm) (Entered: 11/06/2003)

8519

Minute entry: Second day of hearing on motion filed by deft Hon John A. Rullan (dkt #8486). Cnsl Landron req continuance because she is currently on a trial with another Judge. Req granted. Arguments heard. Hearing is continued for Monday, 11/10/03 at 9:00a.m. Court Reporter: Bo Vazquetelles ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8520 Certified and transmitted Record on Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: [8514−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan; Dkt #6673,8486,8500,8503,8506,8514,8515, and 8515 (Transcript) (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 370 of 513

11/06/2003 11/07/2003 11/07/2003
11/07/2003 11/07/2003 11/07/2003 11/07/2003 11/10/2003 11/10/2003
11/12/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003 11/12/2003
11/12/2003 11/13/2003
11/14/2003 11/17/2003
11/17/2003

8521 Certified and transmitted Record on Appeal to U.S. Court of Appeals: [8513−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8522 CHECK # 2911751 in the amount of $ 30,000.00 payable to Hogar Catolico DSantisima Trinidad issued (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8523 MOTION by Union General Trabaj to Intervene by Union General de Trabajadores (UGT) in support of the Secy of Health's motion to vacate and terminate all prospective relief ordering the privatization of the correctional health program of the Dept of Health (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8524 TRANSCRIPT filed for Motion hearing before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/4/03 Court Reporter: Bo Vazquetelles (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8525 MOTION by Correctional Health to Extend Time until 12/8/03 to submit additional grounds to quash subpoena pursuant to FRCP 45(c) (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8526 Motion joining motion to Quash by Pltf class (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8527 TRANSCRIPT filed for further Hearing on motion before Hon Judge Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/5/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 11/10/2003)

8528 TRANSCRIPT filed for hearing before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/5/03 Court Reporter: Bo Vazquetelles (cm) (Entered: 11/12/2003)

8529

Minute entry: Case called for third day of hearing on motin filed by deft Hon John A. Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relife mandating the transfer and privatization of CHP of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Further testimony on behalf of defts is presented. Hearing is continued for 11/12/03 at 9:00a.m. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/12/2003)

8530 CHECK # 2911750 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC issued (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

8531 CHECK # 2911749 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC issued (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

8532 MOTION SUBMITTING payment of interlocutory appeal fee w/copy of Receipt #140761 in the amt of $255.00 and receipt #140762 in the amt of $255.00 attached. (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

8533 Minute entry: Fourth day of hrg held. Further testimony on behalf of defts presented. cont. General Calendar Call for 1:30 11/17/03 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

8534 TRANSCRIPT of 3rd day of hearing filed for date of 11/10/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

8535 ORDER for the transfer of investments in the amt of $15,000,000 from UBS Paine Webber of PR Acct Number JX12738−03 to Santander Securities, DTC# 0443 Acct Number 67C−501292. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2003)

8536 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hearing (Day Four) before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/12/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

8537

Minute entry: Fifth day of Hearing on motion filed by deft Hon John A. Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the Court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHP of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Further testimony hear on behalf of defts. Hearing is continued for 11/18/03 at 9:30 a.m. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

8538 Certified copy of Order from USCCA on 11/13/03, dismissing appeal No. 03−2499 for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Dismissing Appeal No. 03−2498 for lack of jurisdiction. Motions to consolidate these appeals and to stay the evidentiary proceedings before the DC are denied as moot. (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 371 of 513

11/18/2003 11/18/2003
11/18/2003 11/18/2003 11/20/2003
11/21/2003 11/21/2003 11/21/2003 11/21/2003 11/21/2003 11/21/2003 11/21/2003
11/24/2003 11/24/2003 11/24/2003 11/24/2003
11/25/2003

8539 TRANSCRIPT filed for date of 11/17/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

8541 Minute entry: Case called for 7th day of hearing on motion filed by deft Hon John Rullan re:(dkt #8486). Further testimony heard on behalf of defts. Hearing is continued for 11/21/03 at 10:00am. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

8542 Informative Motion with respect to Cross−Claim by Commonwealth defts. (cm) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

8543 Defendant Rullan's opposition to motion to quash and cross motion to compel compliance with subpoenas. (cm) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

8540

Minute entry: Sixth day of hearing on motion filed by deft Hon John A. Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer the privatization of the CHP (dkt #8486). Further testimony heard on behalf of defts. Hearing is continued for 11/19/03 at 9:30am. Exhs for Pltfs admitted 2 and 3. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

8544 ORDER granting [8473−1] Mgmt of America's invoice #11537 professional fees for consulting services covering the month of July 2003 in the amt of $316,239.16. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/21/2003)

8545 ORDER granting [8493−1] Mgmt of America's Invoice #11623A professinal fees for consulting services for August 2003 in the amt of $325,178.02. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/21/2003)

8546 Inv #12/03 for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the stipulation during the month of October 2003 in the amt of $45,919.00, by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (cm) (Entered: 11/21/2003)

8547 ORDER granting [8546−1] Inv #12/03 for professional services by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., in the amt of $45,919.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/21/2003)

8548 TRANSCRIPT filed for Further hearing−Day Seven, before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/19/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 11/24/2003)

8549 TRANSCRIPT filed for Further hearing − Day Six, before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/18/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 11/24/2003)

8550

Minute entry: Eighth day of hearing on motion filed by deft Hon John A. Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHP of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Further testimony heard on behalf of defts. Hearing is continued for 11/24/03 at 9:30 a.m. Exhs admitted:4,5,6,7,8,9,10. Exhs admitted:C,D. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) Modified on 11/24/2003 (Entered: 11/24/2003)

8551 ORDER for investment transactions with Santander Securities, Inc. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

8552 ORDER for the transfer of investments to Paine Webber of Puerto Rico, Inc. (signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez) (cm) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

8554 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hearing, Day Eight before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/21/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

8555

Minute entry: Ninth day of hrg on motion filed by deft Hon Juan Rullan under PLRA to vacate or terminate the court reflief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHP of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Further testimony on behalf of defts heard. Hearing is continued for 12/4/03. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2003)

8553 INVOICE #19053 for professional services rendered during the month of October 2003 covering the transactions for the month of September, 2003 in the amount of $2,300.00, by RSM ROC. (ni) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 372 of 513

11/25/2003 11/25/2003 11/26/2003 12/01/2003 12/02/2003 12/02/2003 12/03/2003 12/04/2003
12/05/2003 12/05/2003 12/05/2003
12/08/2003 12/08/2003 12/08/2003
12/08/2003 12/09/2003 12/09/2003
12/11/2003 12/11/2003

8556 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hearing − 9th day before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 11/24/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2003)

8557 CHECK # 2911892 in the amount of $ 45,919.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD. issued (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2003)

8558 CHECK # 2911791 in the amount of $ 323,530.93 payable to Mgt of America issued (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2003)

8559 CHECK # 2911752 in the amount of $ 302,257.90 payable to Mgt of America issued (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2003)

8560 Invoice #11779 in the amt of $325,405.21 for consulting services 10/2003 by MGT of America. (cm) (Entered: 12/02/2003)

8561 Inv #1/04 for prof services rendered during the month of 11/03 by Curnyn Consulting, Ltd, in the amt of $40,246.00. (cm) (Entered: 12/03/2003)

8562 Motion submitting external audit report of the civil action and education corporation by Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez (cm) (Entered: 12/04/2003)

8563

Minute entry: Tenth day of hearing on motion filed by deft Hon John Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHP of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Defts' exh G admitted. Hearing is continued for 12/5/03 at 10:15 a.m. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) Modified on 12/05/2003 (Entered: 12/05/2003)

8564 Pltf's response to defts' so called informative motion of 11/18/03. (cm) (Entered: 12/08/2003)

8565 TRANSCRIPT filed for day 10 of further hearing on motion date of 12/4/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 12/08/2003)

8566

Minute entry: 11th day of hrg on motion filed by deft Hon John Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHP of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Hearing is continued for 12/8/03 at 1:30p.m. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 12/08/2003)

8567 Motion requesting order prohibiting reprisals against witnesses. (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8568 Motion tendering further grounds to quash subpoena pursuant to FRCP 45(C). (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8569

Minute entry: Nineth day of hearing on motion filed by deft Hon John Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHP of the Dept of Health (dkt #8486). Further testimony heard. Ct adjourns until tomorrow at 1:30 p.m. Exhs admitted: #12. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8570 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hearing − day 11 before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 12/5/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8571 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hearing − day 12, before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 12/8/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8572

Minute entry: Thirteenth day of hrg on motion filed by deft Hon John Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHCP of the dept of health (dkt #8486). Testimony on behalf of pltfs is presented. Hearing is continues for 12/11/03 at 1:30 p.m. Pltf's exhs 13,14,16,17,18 admitted. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) Modified on 12/15/2003 (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8573 TRANSCRIPT filed for further hrg on motion − day 13 before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez dates of 12/9/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz. (cm) Modified on 12/15/2003 (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8574 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum by Pltfs. (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 373 of 513

12/11/2003 12/11/2003 12/11/2003
12/15/2003 12/18/2003 12/18/2003 12/19/2003 12/19/2003 12/22/2003 12/22/2003 12/22/2003 12/22/2003 12/22/2003 12/22/2003
12/22/2003 12/29/2003 12/30/2003 12/30/2003 12/30/2003

8575 JUDGMENT OF USCA (certified copy), issued as informal mandate, Re: [8514−1] appeal, [8513−1] appeal Dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

Record on Appeal returned from U.S. Court of Appeals: [8514−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan, [8513−1] appeal by Johnny Rullan; All vols (copies) received. (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8576

Minute entry: Fourteenth day of hrg on motion filed by deft Hon John Rullan under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the CHCP of the dept of health (dkt #8486). Any further hrg is stayed until the court rules on the pending motions. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz ( Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 12/15/2003)

8577 TRANSCRIPT filed for hearing on motin − day fourteen before Hon Juan M. Perez Gimenez date of 12/11/03 Court Reporter: Diane Breaz (cm) (Entered: 12/17/2003)

8578 ORDER granting [8499−1] Invoice #11715 of Mgmt of America for professional fees for consulting services, Sept 2003 in the amt of $316,536.19. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 12/18/2003)

8579 ORDER granting [8561−1] Invoice #1/04 of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. for the month of November 2003 in th amt of $40,246.00. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (cm) (Entered: 12/18/2003)

8580 CHECK # 2924472 in the amount of $ 40,246.00 payable to Curning Consulting issued (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8581 ORDER for payment of services to RSM ROC in the amt of $2,300 covering services provided in October 2003 in relation to acct month of Sept 2003. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8582 MOTION for OSC why defts should not be held in contempt for failure to comply with compliance plan regarding the delivery of adequate food services to members of the pltf class, by pltfs. (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8583 MOTION to extend the date of the operation of the PLRA automatic stay to prevent irreparable harm to members of the pltf class and in protection of pltfs' due process rights. (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8584 MOTION under Rule 52 (C), by pltf class. (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8585 PROFFER on testimony to be elicited from Curnyn Corp and its relevancy to the req. for termination of relief, by John V. Rullan Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8586 MOTION for disc. and presentation of evidence regarding CHSC, by deft John V. Rullan Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8587 MEMORANDUM on the effect of the stay provisions of the PLRA if the court does not rule by the end of the month and on whether evidentiary hearings could (or should) continue after the stay becomes effective, by John V. Rullan Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8588 MOTION to supplement argument in opposition to Rule 52 motion already made in open court and submitting proposed findings of fact as to to evidence now on the record, by John V. Rullan Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

8589 INVOICE #11839 in the amt of $324,516.82 for services during the month of November, 2003, by MGT of America. (ni) (Entered: 12/29/2003)

8590 CHECK # 2924627 in the amount of $ 316,239.16 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) (Entered: 01/07/2004)

8591 CHECK # 2924629 in the amount of $ 325,178.02 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to a1dd pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/07/2004)

8592 MOTION regarding the commencement of the automatic stay, by pltf class. (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/07/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 374 of 513

12/30/2003 01/08/2004 01/08/2004 01/08/2004 01/09/2004 01/09/2004 01/09/2004 01/13/2004 01/15/2004 01/15/2004 01/15/2004 01/15/2004 01/15/2004 01/15/2004 01/15/2004 01/15/2004 01/20/2004 01/20/2004 01/21/2004 01/26/2004

8593 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req. for leave to file in Spanish, by govt defts. (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/07/2004)
8594 CHECK # 2924682 in the amount of $ 2,300 payable to RSM ROC issued (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/09/2004)
8595 INFORMATIVE motion re: CHSC will be assuming adm. functions w/attach, by John Rullan Secretary of Health. (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/09/2004)
8596 INVOICE # 2/04 in the amt of $38,759.00 for professional services rendered during the month of December, 2003, by Curnyn Consulting. (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/09/2004)
8597 CHECK # 2924473 in the amount of $ 316,536.19 payable to MGT of America issued (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/09/2004)
8598 MOTION req. order directed to the CHSC on the terms proposed in the appendex affixed to deft Rullan's Memorandum on the effect of the stay provisions of the PLRA, w/attach, by John Rullan, Secretary of Health. (ni) (Entered: 01/14/2004)
8599 MOTION in compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and req. for leave to file in Spanish, w/attach, by govt defts. (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/14/2004)
8600 INFORMATIVE motion re: Corr. Health Program has answered the CHSC's 1/9/04 letter w/attach, by John Rullan. (ni) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/15/2004)
8601 ORDER granting dkt #8560. Clerk shall pay invoice. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/15/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER on dkt #8593 noted. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/15/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER granting dkt #8446. Clerk shall issue corresponding check to Nancy Boneta. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/15/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting dkt # 8453. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/15/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8454. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/15/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER mooting dkt #8479. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/15/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER noting dkt #8484. ( signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez ) (ni) (Entered: 01/15/2004)
8602 Report on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of October, November and December 2003. (cm) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/16/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER noting re 8600 Informative motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/15/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/20/2004)
ENDORSED ORDER Noting re 8599 Motion in compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/15/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/20/2004)
8603 Check No. 2924736 Disbursed in amount of $ 17,775.00 payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez for Professional Consulting month of Feb., March, April and May 2003. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/23/2004)
8604 OPINION AND ORDER denying motion under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer and privatization of the Corr. Health Program of the DOH, dkt #8486; granting pltfs' cross motion, dkt #8500. Therefore, Part I(A)(I) and (2) of the Medical Plan is terminated, as well as Order to Implement Medical

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 375 of 513

01/26/2004 01/27/2004 01/27/2004 01/28/2004 01/28/2004 01/28/2004 01/28/2004
01/28/2004 01/28/2004 01/28/2004 01/28/2004 01/29/2004 01/30/2004 01/30/2004 02/02/2004 02/03/2004

Cadre Plan, dkt #6977, and the various orders to assign officers to the Medical Cadre, dkt #7345, dkt #7417, dkt #7453, dkt #7574, dkt #7106, dkt #7418, dkt #7611. Other orders terminated are: dkt #6558, dkt #6830, dkt #6855, dkt #7573, dkt #6567. The Union de Trabajadores Motion to Intervene is denied. Further, the Secretary of Corr. and the pltf class shall meet and file with the court w/in 45 days, a plan on how the Adm. of Corr. will assume his legal responsibility to provide health care to inmates, etc. as stated herein. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/26/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8605 MOTION for Reimbursement of deft's expert witness' fees, filed by Johnny Rullan w/attach. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8606 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to 8604 Opinion and Order, by Johnny Rullan. Filing fee $ 255, receipt number 142583. Appeal Record due by 2/6/2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8607 Invoice number 11920 in the amount of $345,393.94 for consulting fees for the month of December, 2003, by MGT of America. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8608 ORDER for the clerk to transfer $1.98 from the Registry of the court to Acct #501−00001−7 at Banco Santander. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/27/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8609 Invoice number PAC−2003−3 in the amount of $840,076.24 payable to Prodecen, Inc. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8610 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving dkt #8609. Clerk to pay said invoice.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/26/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8611

ORDER approving report (dkt #8602) of the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad and authorizing advancement of fine funds. Clerk shall issue check in the amt of $30,000.00 for expenses during the months of January, February and March, 2004, etc. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/27/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8612 Invoice number 19167 Received on 12/19/04 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RMS ROC & Co. for services during the month of October, 2003. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8613 Invoice number 19322 Received on 1/23/04 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/28/2004)

8614 Check No. 2924737 Disbursed in amount of $ 325,405.21 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/29/2004)

8615 MOTION to Stay re 8604 Opinion and Order, filed by Johnny Rullan (Related document(s) 8604 ) (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/29/2004)

8616 ORDER for sale of investment instruments w/Santander Securities. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/28/04. (ft, ) (Entered: 01/30/2004)

ENDORSED ORDER approving for payment re: 8596 invoice. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/28/04. (ft, ) (Entered: 01/30/2004)

8617 Motion In Compliance with paragraph 44 of the stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing and request for leave to file in Spanish w/attach, filed by all govt defendants (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/02/2004)

8618 Check No. 2924847 Disbursed in amount of $ 840,076.24 payable to Prodecen, Inc. (cm, ) (Entered: 02/05/2004)

8619 Invoice number 3/04 in the amount of $51,508.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD for professional services rendered during the month of January 2004. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/05/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 376 of 513

02/04/2004 02/05/2004 02/05/2004 02/06/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004 02/09/2004 02/11/2004 02/11/2004 02/11/2004 02/25/2004 03/08/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/09/2004 03/10/2004 03/19/2004 03/19/2004 03/22/2004

8620 Check No. 2924848 Disbursed in amount of $ 30,000.00 payable to Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/06/2004)
8621 ORDER re: 8612 invoice for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co., for services provided in Nov 2003 in relation to the accounting month of Oct 2003 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/4/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 02/06/2004)
8622 ORDER re 8613 Invoice for payment of services to RSM Roc & Co., provided in Dec 2003 in relation to the accounting month of November 2003. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/4/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 02/06/2004)
8623 RESPONSE in Opposition filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 8615 MOTION to Stay re 8604 Opinion and Order filed by Johnny Rullan (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/09/2004)
8624 ORDER granting 8619 Invoice #3/04 for Curnyn Consulting, Inc., in the amt of $51,508.00 for consulting services month of January 2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/4/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 02/09/2004)
8625 Check No. 2949745 Disbursed in amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & CO. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/11/2004)
8626 Check No. 2949746 Disbursed in amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & CO. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/11/2004)
8627 ORDER approving the Correctional Health Services Corp., budget for fiscal year 2004 and transfer of funds for the first trimester of fiscal year 2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/6/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 02/11/2004)
8628 Check No. 2949747 Disbursed in amount of $ 51,508.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/13/2004)
8629 Check No. 2949701 Disbursed in amount of $ 38,759.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/13/2004)
8630 Certified and Transmitted Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 8606 Notice of Appeal (cm, ) (Entered: 02/26/2004)
8631 Invoice number 12010 in the amount of $314,489.40 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for consulting fees month of January 2004. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 03/09/2004)
8632 Minute Entry: A meeting in chambers is set for 3/18/2004 03:00 PM in PG's Chambers before USDJ Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. (li, ) (Entered: 03/09/2004)
8633 MOTION for extension of time to submit plan filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/22/2004 (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 03/09/2004)
8634 Invoice number 4/04 in the amount of $45,352.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc., for professional services during the month of February 2004. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 03/11/2004)
8635 Invoice number 19485 in the amount of $2,300.00 for professional services rendered during the month of January 2004 by RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/12/2004)
8636 Minute Entry In Chambers Conference set for 4/1/2004 at 04:30 PM in PG's Courtroom before Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (li, ) (Entered: 03/19/2004)
8640 USCA Case Number 04−1300 for 8606 Notice of Appeal filed by Johnny Rullan. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2004)
8637 ORDER granting 8589 Invoice #11839 in the amt of $324,516.82 payble to MGT of America. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 377 of 513

03/22/2004 03/22/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004
03/23/2004
03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004
03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/23/2004

8638 ORDER granting 8607 Invoice #11920 in the amt of $345,393.94 payable to Mgmt of America for consulting services, 12/03. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2004)
8639 ORDER granting 8631 Invoice #12010 in the amt of $314,489.40 payable to Mgmt of America for professional fees of 1/2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2004)
8641 ORDER mooting 8449 motion for OSC why defts should not be held in contempt and req. that payments to MGT be immediately suspended. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8642 ENDORSED ORDER noting 8483 REQUEST for intervention by Luis R. Nieves Martinez pro se in the Spanish language. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8643 ENDORSED ORDER mooting 8487 MOTION req. time to submit translated documents to statement attached to dkt #8486, by Johnny Rullan. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8644 ORDER noting 8497 MOTION to extend time until 10/23/03 to respond to motion under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the court relief mandating the transfer, by pltfs . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8645 ENDORSED ORDER noting 8532 MOTION SUBMITTING payment of interlocutory appeal fee w/copy of Receipt #140761 in the amt of $255.00 and receipt #140762 in the amt of $255.00 attached. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8646 ENDORSED ORDER noting 8542 Informative Motion with respect to Cross−Claim by Commonwealth defts. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8647 ENDORSED ORDER mooting 8543 Defendant Rullan's opposition to motion to quash and cross motion to compel compliance with subpoenas. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8648 ENDORSED ORDER noting 8562 Motion submitting external audit report of the civil action and education corporation by Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8649 ENDORSED ORDER mooting 8567 Motion requesting order prohibiting reprisals against witnesses. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8650 ENDORSED ORDER mooting 8568 Motion tendering further grounds to quash subpoena pursuant to FRCP 45(C). Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8651 ENDORSED ORDER mooting 8574 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum by Pltfs. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8652 ENDORSED ORDER denying 8605 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Johnny Rullan. Defts are to bear the expenses of the experts they presented during the hearing held during the months of November and December 2003. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8653 ENDORSED ORDER noted 8617 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8654 ORDER for disbursement of Funds to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd in the month of $45,352.00 for the month of February 2004. Invoice # 4/04. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8655 ORDER for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amount of $2,300.00 for services provided in January 2004 in relation to the accounting month of December 2003 re 8635 Invoice # 19485 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 378 of 513

03/23/2004 03/23/2004 03/24/2004
03/24/2004
03/25/2004 03/25/2004 03/25/2004 03/25/2004 03/26/2004 03/29/2004 03/29/2004 03/30/2004
04/02/2004
04/02/2004 04/02/2004 04/02/2004

(ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8656 Invoice number PAC−2004−1 in the amount of $348,990.78 payable to Prodecen, Inc. for educational services for Vocational Training Courses. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8657 ORDER approving for payment 8656 Invoice PAC−2004−1 in the amt of $348,990.78 to Prodecen, Inc. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/23/2004)
8658 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Document TO SUBMIT PLAN filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/6/2004 (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 03/24/2004)
8659 Motion for Contempt Administrator of Corrections filed by Manuel A. Rodriguez−Banchs on behalf of all plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/6/2004 (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Rodriguez−Banchs, Manuel) (Entered: 03/24/2004)
8660 ENDORSED ORDER noting 8564 Plaintiff's response to defts' so called informative motion of 11/18/03. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/25/2004)
8662 Check No. 2950310 Disbursed in amount of $ 2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Co, (cm, ) (Entered: 03/26/2004)
8663 Check No. 2950311 Disbursed in amount of $ 45,352.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 03/26/2004)
8664 Check No. 2950312 Disbursed in amount of $ 348,990.78 payable to Prodecen, Inc. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 03/26/2004)
8661 ORDER, Set DeadlinesNotice of Compliance with this Court's January 26, 2004 order − the Deadline is Reset, due by 3/29/2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/25/04. (csh, ) (Entered: 03/26/2004)
8665 ORDER for sale of investment instruments. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/25/04. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 03/29/2004)
8666 MOTION Submitting compliance plan filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit to compliance plan)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 03/29/2004)
8667 RESPONSE in Opposition to plaintiffs' motion for order to show cause filed by Corrections Administration Re: 8659 Motion for Contempt Administrator of Corrections filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs (Sanchez−Betances, Luis) (Entered: 03/30/2004)
8668 ORDER finding as moot 8001 Motion requesting payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman as Chief Health Care Coordinator. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/04. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/27/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 04/02/2004)
8669 ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot 7970 Pltf's opposition to deft's req for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/24/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 04/02/2004)
8670 ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot 7951 Request for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman, as Chief Health Care Coordinator. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 04/02/2004)
8671 ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot 8064 Third motion req resolution of req for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 04/02/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 379 of 513

04/02/2004 04/02/2004
04/06/2004 04/06/2004 04/06/2004 04/07/2004 04/19/2004 04/19/2004 04/30/2004
05/03/2004 05/03/2004 05/10/2004 05/10/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004 05/18/2004
05/27/2004

8672 ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot 8072 Pltf's Opposition to deft's third req for payment of compensation for services rendered by Dr. Aida Guzman. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 04/02/2004)

8673

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Status Confrence and Show Cause Hearing held on 4/1/2004 as to plffs.' motion for contempt (dkt. #8659). Show Cause Hearing is continued for 5/10/2004 @ 09:00 AM to give the plffs. an opportunity to review the plan submitted by the defendants. (Court Reporter Bo VAZQUETELLES.) (li, ) (Entered: 04/02/2004)

8674 Invoice number 12091 in the amount of $$332,082.11 payable to MGT of America for professional services for the month of February 2004.(ni, ) (Entered: 04/07/2004)

8675 REPORT on use of funds covering months of January, February and March, 2004, w/attachments by Hogar Catolico. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/24/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 04/07/2004)

8677 Invoice number 5/04 for professional services rendered during month of March 2004, in the amount of $49,782.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd (cm, ) (rc). (Entered: 04/14/2004)

8676 MOTION Submitting Invoice for Consulting Services and Request for Leave to File in Spanish filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Consulting Services Invoices)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 04/07/2004)

8678 ORDER for investment transactions with Santander Securities, Inc. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/16/04. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/24/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 04/19/2004)

8679 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : The Order To Show Cause Hearing set for 05/10/04 is hereby continued for 6/1/2004 @ 09:00 AM before USDJ Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. (li, ) (Entered: 04/19/2004)

8680 Motion In Compliance With Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodialand Sociopenal Staffing and for Leave to File in Spanish filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments: # 1)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 04/30/2004)

8681 TRANSCRIPT of Status Conference Proceedings held on April 1, 2004 before Judge Juan Perez Gimenez. Court Reporter: Boabdil Vazquetelles. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/24/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 05/03/2004)

8682 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to US Court of Appeals Re 8606 Notice of Appeal filed by Johnny Rullan (Copies of Dkts. 1959,...,8676; 6661,...,8534/transcripts & 8472,...,8600 in CD Rom) (xi, ) (Entered: 05/03/2004)

8683 Invoice number 12164 for March 2004 in the amount of $320,251.53 payable to MGT of America, Inc. (cm, ) (Entered: 05/10/2004)

8684 Invoice for professional serviced rendered during the month of April 2004, number 6/04 in the amount of $49,493.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (cm, ). Modified on 9/24/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 05/13/2004)

8685 ORDER APPROVING 8675 Report filed by Hogar Catolico. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/04. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/24/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 05/18/2004)

8686 ORDER GRANTING 8684 Invoice Statement of Curnyn Consulting, Ltd for the month of April 2004 in the amt of $49,493.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

8687 ORDER GRANTING 8677 Invoice number 5/04 for professional services rendered during month of March 2004, in the amount of $49,782.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 05/18/2004)

8688 Motion In Compliance With Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Request for Leave to File En Spanish filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 380 of 513

05/28/2004 05/28/2004
06/01/2004 06/01/2004 06/15/2004 06/15/2004 06/15/2004 06/15/2004 06/16/2004 06/16/2004 06/16/2004 06/17/2004 06/22/2004
06/24/2004 07/01/2004 07/02/2004 07/06/2004

# 1)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 05/27/2004)

8689 INFORMATIVE Motion and Request for Continuance Sine Die of Hearing filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 05/28/2004)

8690

ORDER re 8689 INFORMATIVE Motion and Request for Continuance Sine Die of Hearing filed by Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico. BY ORDER OF THE COURT the Order To Show Cause Hearing set for 6/1/04 is hereby RESET for 7/19/2004 @ 09:00 AM before USDJ Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. MOTION is terminated. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/28/04. (li, ) (Entered: 05/28/2004)

8691 INFORMATIVE Motion Protocols of the Correctional Health Program filed by Eileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of Johnny Rullan (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 06/01/2004)

8692 Invoice number 7/04 in the amount of $53,404.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) . Modified on 9/24/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 06/02/2004)

ENDORSED ORDER noting 8691 Informative motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/10/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/15/2004)

ENDORSED ORDER approving 8676 Invoice for consulting services in the amount of $13,050.00 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/10/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/15/2004)

ENDORSED ORDER noted 8680 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/10/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/15/2004)

ENDORSED ORDER noted 8688 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/10/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/15/2004)

8694 ORDER approving payment of 8674 Invoice #12091 in the amt of $332,082.11 payable to MGT of America. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/10/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/16/2004)

8695 ORDER approving for payment 8683 Invoice #12164 in the amt of $320,251.53 payable to MGT of America. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/10/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/16/2004)

8696 ORDER approving for payment 8692 Invoice #7/04 in the amt of $53,404.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/10/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/16/2004)

8697 Invoice number 12265 in the amount of $337,338.08 payable to MGT of America of April, 2004 Payment #16 w/attachments. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/17/2004)

8698

MOTION requesting Order for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action And Education Corporation filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Aula Verde: An Insect Garden As A Metaphor of Sustainable Community Development (Pilot Project))(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/22/2004)

8699 ORDER approving for payment dkt # 8697 Invoice #12265 in the amount of $337,338.08 payable to MGT of America. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/23/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/24/2004)

8700 Invoice number 12399 in the amount of $304,972.26 payable to MGT of America (ft, ) (Entered: 07/02/2004)

8701 Invoice for professional services during the month of June 2004, number 8/04 in the amount of $58,730.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/23/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 07/06/2004)

8702 ORDER granting in part 8698 Motion requesting Order for disbursement of funds to finance civil action and education corporation. At this time the court will transfer half of the requested amount of $1,528,642.00. As soon as the fine fund account is replenished, the Court will transfer the other half of the requested budget. Clerk of

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 381 of 513

07/06/2004 07/06/2004
07/06/2004 07/07/2004 07/08/2004 07/09/2004 07/16/2004 07/18/2004
07/19/2004 07/19/2004 07/19/2004 07/20/2004 07/20/2004
07/21/2004 07/21/2004

Court to issue a check in the amount of $1,528,642.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/1/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/06/2004)

8703 MOTION requesting transfer of funds−second trimester filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (cm, ) (Entered: 07/06/2004)

8704

ORDER granting in part 8703 Motion requesting transfer of funds−second trimester. At this time the Court will consent to the transfer of half of the requested amount, $3,462,500.00. As soon as the fine fund account is replenished, the Court will transfer the other half of the requested operating budget. The Clerk of Court shall issue a check in the amt of $3,462,500.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/1/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/06/2004)

8705 REPORT on use of funds covering the months of April, May and June, 2004 by Hogar Catolico. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits) (ov, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 7/7/2004 (ov, ). (Entered: 07/07/2004)

8706 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Request for Leave to File in Spanish filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments: # 1)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 07/07/2004)

8707 Order granting 8701 Invoice #8/04 in the amount of $58,730.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD., for professional services month of June 2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/7/04. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/08/2004)

8708 MOTION to Quash Subpoena filed by Miguel A. Nazario−Briceno on behalf of Canteen Correctional Services (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3)(cm, ) (Entered: 07/12/2004)

8709 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum filed by Manuel A. Rodriguez−Banchs on behalf of all plaintiffs (Rodriguez−Banchs, Manuel) (Entered: 07/16/2004)

8710

INFORMATIVE Motion Submitting Compliance Plan and Requesting Stay or Deferment of Show Cause Hearing filed by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Sila M. Calderon (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit AOC Compliance Plan (A)# 2 Exhibit AOC Compliance Plan (B)# 3 Exhibit Letter to Angel Rotger Sabat)(Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Entered: 07/18/2004)

ENDORSED ORDER granting 8709 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/19/04. (ja, ) Modified on 7/20/2004 (ja, ). (Entered: 07/19/2004)

8711 NOTICE of Appearance of MILAGROS RIVERA GUADARRAMA and FERMIN L. ARRAIZA NAVAS by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez by on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/19/2004)

8718 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Order to Show Cause Hearing held on 7/19/2004. Testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs is heard. Show Cause Hearing will continue on 7/20/2004 at 09:00 AM before Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter Bou Vazquetelles.) (ja, ) (Entered: 07/27/2004)

8712 MOTION requesting Order Prohibiting Reprisals Against Witnesses filed by Manuel A. Rodriguez−Banchs on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rodriguez−Banchs, Manuel) (Entered: 07/20/2004)

8719

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Second day of Show Cause Hearing held on 7/20/2004. Further testimony on behalf of the plffs is heard. Show Cause Hearing to continue on 7/21/2004 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Clerk)(Court Reporter Diane Breaze.) (ja, ) (Entered: 07/27/2004)

8720 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings held on 7/20/04 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Giminez. Court Reporter: Diane Breaze. (ja, ) (Entered: 07/27/2004)

8721 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Third day of Show Cause Hearing held on 7/21/2004. Further testimony on behalf of the plaintiffs is heard. Show Cause Hearing to resume on 7/22/2004 at 09:30 AM before

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 382 of 513

07/21/2004
07/22/2004 07/22/2004 07/22/2004 07/22/2004 07/22/2004
07/27/2004
07/28/2004 07/28/2004 07/28/2004 07/30/2004
08/02/2004
08/03/2004 08/03/2004 08/03/2004 08/05/2004 08/05/2004

Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Clerk)(Court Reporter Bou Vazquetelles & Diane Breaze.) (ja, ) (Entered: 07/27/2004)

8722

ORDER granting re 8712 MOTION requesting Order Prohibiting Reprisals Against Witnesses filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Motions terminated: 8712 MOTION requesting Order Prohibiting Reprisals Against Witnesses filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/21/04. (ja, ) (Entered: 07/27/2004)

8713 ENDORSED ORDER granting 8708 Motion to Quash . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/20/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 07/22/2004)

8714 ENDORSED ORDER GRANTING 8711 Notice of Appearance filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/20/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 07/22/2004)

8715 TRANSCRIPT of ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE held on 7/19/2004 before Judge JUAN M. PEREZ−GIMENEZ. Court Reporter: BOABDIL VAZQUETELLES. (be, ) (Entered: 07/22/2004)

8716 TRANSCRIPT of FURTHER ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE held on 7/21/2004 before Judge JUAN M. PEREZ−GIMENEZ. Court Reporter: BOABDIL VAZQUETELLES. (be, ) (Entered: 07/22/2004)

8717 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Further Order to Show Cause Hearing held on 7/22/2004. Further Hearing is continued for 7/27/2004 at 09:00 AM before Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter D. BREAZ.) (be, ) (Entered: 07/23/2004)

8723

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Further Show Cause Hearing held on 7/27/2004. Testimony of witnesses Fernando Muriel, Alejandro Pagan, Victor Yanes, Luis Velez, Edison Flores and Luis Lugo heard on behalf of plaintiffs. Testimony of Miguel Pereira is rescheduled for tomorrow, July 28, 2004 at 9:00 a.m. (Court Reporter Dianne Breaz.) (yr, ) (Entered: 07/27/2004)

8726 JOINT Exhibit List. (su, ) (Entered: 07/30/2004)

8727 PLAINTIFFS' Exhibit List. (su, ) (Entered: 07/30/2004)

8728 DEFENDANTS' Exhibit List. (su, ) (Entered: 07/30/2004)

8725 Motion In Compliance With Paragraph 44 Of The Stipulation Regarding Custodial And Sociopenal Staffing And Request For Leave To File In Spanish filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments: # 1)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 07/30/2004)

8729 ORDER referring matter to the US Attorney to investigate and advise if violation of criminal statutes have occurred. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/04. (Attachments: Exhibit # 1 Letter of 3/1/04 from Secretary of Justice; Exhibit # 2 Opinion & Order of 1/26/04 )(ni, ) (Entered: 08/02/2004)

8730 ENDORSED ORDER noted 8706 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/03/2004)

8731 ENDORSED ORDER noted 8725 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/03/2004)

8732 ORDER APPROVING 8700 Invoice for payment.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/03/2004)

8733 Invoice number 19647 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of February and March 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/05/2004)

8734 Invoice number 19746 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of March 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/05/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 383 of 513

08/05/2004 08/05/2004 08/05/2004 08/09/2004 08/09/2004 08/09/2004 08/09/2004 08/09/2004 08/11/2004 08/11/2004 08/12/2004 08/12/2004 08/12/2004 08/13/2004
08/17/2004
08/18/2004 09/02/2004

8735 Invoice number 19921 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of April, 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/05/2004)

8736 Invoice number 20163 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of May, 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/05/2004)

8737 Invoice number 20254 received on 7/21/04 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of June, 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/05/2004)

8738 Invoice number 9/04 in the amount of $66,200.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for professional services rendered during the month of July, 2004. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/23/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 08/09/2004)

8739 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds 8733 Invoice #19647 in the amt of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/6/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/09/2004)

8740 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds 8734 Invoice #19746 payable to RSM ROC & Company in the amt of $2,300.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/6/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/09/2004)

8741 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 8737 Invoice #20254 payable to RSM ROC & Company in the amt of $2,300.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/6/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/09/2004)

8742 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 8736 Invoice #20163 payable to RSM ROC & Company in the amt of $2,300.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/6/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/09/2004)

8744 TRANSCRIPT of Order to Show Cause Proceedings held on July 28, 2004, afternoon session before Judge Juan M. Perez Gimenez. Court Reporter: Boabdil Vazquetelles. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/23/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 08/11/2004)

8745 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings of further Show Cause hearing − Day Six (Morning Session) held on 7/28/04 before Judge Perez Gimenez. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/11/2004)

8746 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings Show Cause hearing held on 7/22/04 before Judge Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

8747 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings of Show Cause Hearing held on 7/27/04 before Judge Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter: Diane Breaz. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

8748 ORDER approving 8735 Invoice #19921 in the amount of $2,300 to RSM ROC & Co. for services provided in April, 2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/11/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/12/2004)

8750 ORDER re: approving 8738 Invoice number 9/04 in the amount of $66,200.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for professional services rendered during the month of July, 2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/11/04. (cm, ) . (Entered: 08/13/2004)

8752

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Further Show Cause Hearing held on 7/28/04. Testimony of witness Miguel Pereira, Secretary of Corrections, heard on behalf of plaintiffs. Plantiffs rest. Counsel for defts move to Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Court denied request (Court Reporter Bo Vazquetelles.) (su, ) (Entered: 08/17/2004)

8753 Invoice number 12516 in the amount of $318,854.93 payable to MGT for the month of June 2004 (ni, ) (Entered: 08/19/2004)

8754 Invoice number 20463 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for services rendered during the month of July, 2004 covering the transactions for the month of June, 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/02/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 384 of 513

09/03/2004
09/03/2004 09/03/2004 09/03/2004
09/08/2004 09/22/2004 09/30/2004 10/06/2004 10/07/2004 10/12/2004 10/12/2004 10/14/2004 10/14/2004 10/14/2004 10/14/2004 10/19/2004

8755

***FILED IN ERROR*** MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services and Request for Leave to File in Spanish filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit # 2 Exhibit # 3 Exhibit # 4 Exhibit # 5 Exhibit # 6 Exhibit)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Modified on 9/13/2004 − filed in error )(ni, ). (Entered: 09/03/2004)

8756 ***FILED IN ERROR*** MOTION Submitting invoices for consulting services filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) Modified on 9/13/2004 − filed in error. (ni, ). (Entered: 09/03/2004)

Appeal Record Returned: 8606 Notice of Appeal (xi, ) (Entered: 09/03/2004)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 8755 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services and Request for Leave to File in Spanish, 8756 MOTION Submitting invoices for consulting services. (Motions to refiled since the attachments are illegible, and they lack electronic signature and certificate of service. ) (ni, ) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

8758 Invoice number 10/04 in the amount of $61,607 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of August, 2004. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/22/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 09/09/2004)

8759 Invoice number 12623 in the amount of $316,174.83 payable to MGT of America for professional services for the month of July 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/22/2004)

8760 Invoice number 12686 in the amount of $322,644.02 payable to MGT of America for the month of August, 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/01/2004)

8763 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 10/06/2004)

8764 ORDER for defendant to submit to the Court, within 30 days, reports as stated herein. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 11/8/2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/6/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/07/2004)

8765 Invoice number 11/04 in the amount of $63,042.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of September, 2004. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/22/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 10/12/2004)

8766 BY ORDER OF THE COURT,a Status Conference is set for 10/20/2004 at 04:30 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/12/04. (ja, ) (Entered: 10/12/2004)

8768 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $61,607.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of August 2004 re: 8758 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/12/04. (ni, ) Modified on 10/14/2004 to add document. (ni, ). (Entered: 10/14/2004)

8769 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $24,075 payable to Nancy Boneta Lopez for the months of 9/2003, 10/2003, 1/2004, 2/2004, 3/2004, 5/2004 and 6/2004 re: 8763 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/12/04. (ni, ) Modified on 10/14/2004 to add document. (ni, ). (Entered: 10/14/2004)

8770 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $63,042 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of September 2004 re: 8765 . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/12/04. (ni, ). Modified on 10/14/2004 to add document. (ni, ). (Entered: 10/14/2004)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 8768 Order of Distribution of Funds, 8769 Order of Distribution of Funds,, 8770 Order of Distribution of Funds (pdf document attached) (ni, ) (Entered: 10/14/2004)

8771 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds for payment of Invoice # 20463 to RSM ROC & Company in the amount of $2,300.00 for services provided in July 2004 in relation to the accounting month of June 2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/12/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/19/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 385 of 513

10/21/2004 10/28/2004 10/28/2004 10/28/2004
11/05/2004
11/05/2004 11/05/2004 11/10/2004 11/15/2004
11/18/2004 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 12/01/2004 12/10/2004

8772 Invoice number 12765 in the amount of $306,950.46 payable to MGT of America for the month of September 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/21/2004)

8773 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 8753 approving payment of Invoice #12516 in the amt of $318,854.93 to MGT of America. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/26/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/28/2004)

8774 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 8759 approving payment of Invoice #12623 in the amt of $316,174.83 to MGT of America. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/26/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/28/2004)

8775

ORDER. The Court has received notice of the recusal of the entire US Attorney's Office for the District of Puerto Rico, and notice that US Attorney Paul Perez and Assistant US Attorney James Klindt of the Middle District of Florida will continue to handle this matter. Notice of appearance to be filed. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/28/04. (Attachments: # 1 Copy of Order of 10/6/04)(ni, ) (Entered: 10/28/2004)

8776 Motion In Compliance With Court Order filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit # 2 Exhibit # 3 Exhibit Continuation of Exhibit 2# 4 Exhibit Continuation of Exhibit 2)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 11/05/2004)

8777 MOTION for extension of time until 10/9/04 filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/18/2004 (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 11/05/2004)

8778 Invoice number 12/04 in the amount of $57,130.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the month of October 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/08/2004)

8779 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 11/10/2004)

8780 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Status Conference held on 10/20/2004 re: Secretary of Corrections compliance with Court's Contempt Order of 10/6/04. Plan will be submitted by 11/6/04. (Clerk) (ja, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/15/2004 (ja, ). (Entered: 11/15/2004)

8781 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 11/18/2004)

8783 ORDER granting 8781 Motion submitting invoice. Clerk to issue check in the amount of $3,675.00 payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/29/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/01/2004)

8784 ORDER approving 8760 Invoice and directing Clerk to pay said invoice. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/29/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/01/2004)

8785 ORDER re 8778 Invoice. Clerk to issue check in the amt of $57,130 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/29/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/01/2004)

8786 PETITION to Appear and practice by Paul I. Perez on behalf of USA (Attachments: # 1 Letter US DOJ # 2 Appointment Affidavits)(ni, ) (Entered: 12/02/2004)

8787 ORDER re 8786 Petition to Appear filed by USA. Signed by Clerk on 12/1/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/02/2004)

8788 PETITION TO Appear by James R. Klindt on behalf of USA (Attachments: # 1 Letter US DOJ # 2 Appointment Affidavits)(ni, ) (Entered: 12/02/2004)

8789 ORDER re 8788 Notice of Appearance filed by USA. Signed by Clerk on 12/1/04. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/02/2004)

8790 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Secretary of Corrections Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court as to Miguel Pereira Castillo filed byRicardo Alfonso−Garcia on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Alfonso−Garcia, Ricardo) (Entered: 12/10/2004)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 386 of 513

12/10/2004 12/13/2004 12/14/2004 12/21/2004 12/28/2004 01/03/2005 01/03/2005 01/03/2005 01/04/2005 01/04/2005 01/08/2005 01/11/2005 01/11/2005 01/11/2005 01/11/2005 01/11/2005 01/11/2005 01/11/2005
01/11/2005

8791 Invoice number 13/04 in the amount of $64,791.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the month of November 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/13/2004)
8792 Invoice number 12830 in the amount of $363,143.19 payable to MGT of America for services during the month of October 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/13/2004)
8793 Motion In Compliance filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Sila M. Calderon (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Staffing Pattern for Bayamon 1072)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 12/14/2004)
8794 NOTICE to Parties of Subpoena Duces Tecum by all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Subpoena)(Rodriguez−Banchs, Manuel) (Entered: 12/21/2004)
8795 Invoice number 12917 in the amount of $388,730.15 payable to MGT of America for services during the month of November 2004. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 12/28/2004)
8797 Invoice number 20587 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of August 2004. (re, ) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/04/2005)
8798 Invoice number 20882 in the amount of $4,600.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of September and October 2004. (re, ) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/04/2005)
8800 ***FILED IN ERROR−directed to the Clerk of Court*** LETTER MOTION requesting remedy filed by Luis Munoz−Munoz, pro se. (re, ) Modified on 9/21/2005 (ni, ). (Entered: 01/10/2005)
8799 Motion In Compliance filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Sila M. Calderon (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 01/04/2005)
8801 Invoice number 1/05 in the amount of $65,518.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for services rendered during the month of December 2004. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 01/11/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER noted 8776 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER noted 8793 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/10/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER noted 8794 Notice of service of trial subpoena duces tecum. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/10/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER noted 8799 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/10/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER finding as moot 8777 Motion for extension of time . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/10/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
8802 ORDER approving 8772 Invoice for payment of Invoice #12765 payable to MGT of America in the amt of $306,950.46. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
8803 ORDER approving 8791 Invoice for payment payable to Curnyn Consulting in the amt of $64,791.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
8804 ORDER approving for payment 8792 Invoice number 12830 in the amount of $363,143.19 payable to MGT of America for services during the month of October 2004. (ni, ) . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)
8805 ORDER approving for payment 8795 Invoice number 12917 in the amount of $388,730.15 payable to MGT of America for services during the month of November 2004. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 387 of 513

01/11/2005
01/12/2005
01/12/2005 01/18/2005 01/18/2005 01/28/2005
02/01/2005 02/02/2005 02/10/2005
02/15/2005 02/22/2005 02/24/2005
02/28/2005
03/02/2005 03/03/2005 03/03/2005 03/08/2005

8806 ORDER approving for payment 8801 Invoice number 1/05 in the amount of $65,518.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for services rendered during the month of December 2004 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2005)

8808 ORDER approving for payment 8798 Invoice number 20882 in the amount of $4,600.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of September and October 2004.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/12/2005)

8809 ORDER approving for payment 8797 Invoice number 20587 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of August 2004. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/11/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/12/2005)

8811 Letter from Correctional Health Services Corp. requesting transfer of funds. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/19/2005)

8812 ORDER re 8811 CHSC Letter. Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $3,623,660.00 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/11/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/19/2005)

8813 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Request for Leave to File in Spanish filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Staffing Pattern)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 01/28/2005)

8814 Invoice number 13027 in the amount of $404,367.15 payable to MGT of America for the month of December 2004. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/02/2005)

8815 Invoice number 02/05 in the amount of $63,804.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for services during the month of January 2005. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 02/03/2005)

8816

RESPONSE to Motion to Order Defendant Secretary of Corrections to Show Cause why He Should not be Held in Contempt of Court filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo Re: 8790 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Secretary of Corrections Should Not be Held in Contempt of Court as to Miguel Pereira Castillo filed by All Plaintiffs, (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 02/10/2005)

8817 ORDER approving 8815 Invoice #2/05 in the amt of $63,804.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/14/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/15/2005)

8818 Invoice number 13072 in the amount of $401,940.99 payable to MGT of America. Payment #25 for January, 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/23/2005)

8819

REPLY in Opposition to Motion to Show Cause and Second Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why Secretary Pereira Should not be Held in Contempt of Court filed by all plaintiffs Re: 8816 Response to Motion, filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo, (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) Modified on 2/28/2005 to correct title. (ni, ). (Entered: 02/24/2005)

8820 ORDER finding as moot 8615 Motion to Stay, finding as moot 8633 Motion for extension of time, finding as moot 8658 Motion for Extension of Time to File, finding as moot 8659 Motion for Contempt, finding as moot 8666 Motion submitting . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/28/05. (ba, ) (Entered: 02/28/2005)

8821 ORDER approving 8814 Invoice #13027 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/25/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/02/2005)

8822 Amended NOTICE of Appearance by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Anibal Acevedo Vila (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Entered: 03/03/2005)

8823 Amended NOTICE of Appearance (Correct title) by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Anibal Acevedo Vila (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Entered: 03/03/2005)

8825 Invoice number 3/05 in the amount of $63,838.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of February 2005. (ni, ) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 03/08/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 388 of 513

03/14/2005
03/16/2005 03/17/2005 03/21/2005 03/22/2005 03/22/2005 03/22/2005 03/22/2005 03/22/2005 04/01/2005 04/04/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/14/2005 04/20/2005

8826 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Employment Security of Correctional Health Program Employees filed byCarlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Anibal Acevedo Vila (Attachments: # 1 Appendix CHSC Letter 050310)(Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Entered: 03/14/2005)
8827 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Correctional Health Services Corporation ("CHSC") filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 03/16/2005)
8828 INFORMATIVE Motion re: budgetary analysis filed byAngel E. Rotger−Sabat on behalf of Correctional Health Services Corporation (Rotger−Sabat, Angel) Modified on 3/18/2005 to add text (ov, ). (Entered: 03/17/2005)
8830 Invoice number 13203 for the month of February 2005, in the amount of $389,193.34 payable to MGT of America, Payment #26. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2005)
8832 ENDORSED ORDER noted 8790 Motion for Order to Show Cause . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/17/2005. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2005)
8833 ENDORSED ORDER noted 8813 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/17/2005. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2005)
8834 ENDORSED ORDER noting 8816 Response to Motion, filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/17/2005. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2005)
8835 ENDORSED ORDER noting 8819 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/17/2005. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2005)
8836 ENDORSED ORDER noted 8827 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/17/2005. (cm, ) (Entered: 03/22/2005)
8838 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed byEsther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 04/01/2005)
8839 Invoice number 4/05 in the amount of $69,023.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for services rendered during the month of March 2005. (cm, ) . Modified on 9/21/2010 to add pdf (rc). (Entered: 04/05/2005)
8842 Invoice number 20951 in the amount of $2,300 for the month of November 2004, payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8843 ORDER approving 8842 Invoice. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/14/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8844 Invoice number 21079 in the amount of $2,300 for the month of December 2004, payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8845 ORDER approving 8844 Invoice. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/13/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8846 Invoice number 21259 in the amount of $2,300 for the month of January, 2005 payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8847 ORDER approving 8846 Invoice. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/13/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8848 Invoice number 21507 in the amount of $2,300 for the month of February, 2005 payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8849 ORDER approving 8848 Invoice. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/13/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/15/2005)
8850 ORDER noted 8828 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/18/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 389 of 513

04/20/2005 04/20/2005 04/22/2005 04/26/2005 04/27/2005 04/28/2005 04/29/2005 05/02/2005
05/05/2005
05/09/2005 05/09/2005 05/11/2005 05/24/2005 05/24/2005 05/24/2005 05/24/2005

8851 ORDER approving 8838 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services . Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $19,725.00 to Nancy Boneta Lopez. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/18/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

8852 ORDER approving 8839 Invoice. Clerk shall issue a check in the amt of $69,023.00 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/18/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/20/2005)

8853 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certification# 2 Exhibit staffing pattern)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 04/22/2005)

8854 MOTION for Hearing or Status Conference on Correctional Health filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 04/26/2005)

8855 INFORMATIVE Motion filed byAngel E. Rotger−Sabat on behalf of Correctional Health Services Corporation (Rotger−Sabat, Angel) (Entered: 04/27/2005)

8856 ORDER noted 8853 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/28/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/29/2005)

8858 Invoice number 13295 in the amount of $421,616.80 for the month of March 2005, payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 05/02/2005)

8857

RESPONSE to Motion to Request a Hearing or Status Conference on Correctional Health filed by Corrections Administration Re: 8854 MOTION for Hearing or Status Conference on Correctional Health filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) Modified on 5/4/2005 to correct title. (ni, ). (Entered: 05/02/2005)

8859

ORDER re 8854 MOTION for Hearing or Status Conference on Correctional Health filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs,, 8855 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation: Status Conference is set for 5/12/2005 at 05:00 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/5/05. (ja, ) (Entered: 05/05/2005)

8861 Invoice number 5/05 in the amount of $69,390.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the month of April 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/09/2005)

8862 ORDER resetting In Chambers Meeting for 5/26/2005 at 05:00 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/9/05. (ja, ) (Entered: 05/09/2005)

8863 ORDER approving for payment re 8830 Invoice #8830 in the amt of $389,193.34 payable to MGT for services during the month of February 2005. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/9/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/11/2005)

8864 ***FILED IN ERROR*** INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues filed byCarlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Anibal Acevedo Vila (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Modified on 6/3/2005 − lacking electronic signature) (ni, ). (Entered: 05/24/2005)

8865 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues filed by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Anibal Acevedo Vila and Miguel Pereira Castillo (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) Modified on 6/3/2005 to add filer. (electronically submitted by Attorney Carlos del Valle.) (ni, ). (Entered: 05/24/2005)

8866 ***FILED IN ERROR*** INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues filed byCarlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Anibal Acevedo Vila (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Modified on 6/3/2005−DUPLICATE FILING of dkt #8865) (ni, ). (Entered: 05/24/2005)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk. 8864 and 8866 terminated as filed in error. 8865 and 8867 Modified. 1) Documents should contain electronic signature; 2) electronic signature should match name of attorney filing document, and 3) all filers should be included in one motion). (ni, ) (Entered: 06/03/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 390 of 513

05/25/2005
05/31/2005 06/03/2005
06/07/2005 06/07/2005 06/10/2005 06/10/2005
06/10/2005 06/14/2005
06/16/2005 06/23/2005 06/27/2005 06/29/2005 06/29/2005 07/05/2005 07/06/2005

8867

MOTION Submitting Health Care Agreement re 8865 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo and Anibal Acevedo Vila, filed by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Anibal Acevedo Vila (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Global Agreement)(Related document(s) 8865 ) (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) Modified on 6/3/2005 (lacking electronic signature) (ni, ). (Entered: 05/25/2005)

8869 Invoice number 13382 for the month of April 2005 in the amount of $417,617.78 payable to MGT of America. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

8870

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion Regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues and Motion Submitting Global Agreement filed by all plaintiffs Re: 8865 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo,, Anibal Acevedo Vila,, 8867 MOTION Submitting Health Care Agreement filed by Anibal Acevedo Vila, (Attachments: # 1)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) Modified on 6/8/2005 re: links. (ni, ). (Entered: 06/03/2005)

8871 REPLY 8870 to Opposition to Global Agreement re: 8865 and 8867 filed by Anibal Acevedo Vila (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) Modified on 6/10/2005 to create links and correct title. (ni, ). (Entered: 06/07/2005)

8872 Invoice number 6/05 in the amount of $66,964.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd for the month of May 2005, w/attachments. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/08/2005)

8873 ORDER approving 8858 Invoice #13295 payable to MGT of America for the month of March 2005 in the amount of $421,616.80 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/9/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/10/2005)

8874 ORDER approving 8861 Invoice #5/05 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. in the amount of $69,390.00 for the month of April 2005 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/9/05. (ni, ) Modified on 6/10/2005 to add Invoice #. (ni, ). (Entered: 06/10/2005)

8875 ORDER approving 8872 Invoice #6/05 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd in the amount of $66,964.00 for the month of May 2005 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/8/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/10/2005)

8876 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Staffing Pattern Certification)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 06/14/2005)

8877 Invoice number 13203A in the amount of $9,000 payable to MGT of America as due amount for services, February 2005. (Attachments: # 1) (ni, ) (Entered: 06/16/2005)

8879 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed byEsther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 06/23/2005)

8881 ORDER regarding global agreement.Deadline set for June 29,2005 . Signed
by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/27/05. (ba, ) (Entered: 06/27/2005)

8882 Invoice number 13474 in the amount of $392,805.11 payable to MGT of America for the month of May 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/29/2005)

8883 Motion In Compliance with Court Order filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 06/29/2005)

8885 Invoice number 7/05 in the amount of $72,358.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD for the month of June 2005. (ft, ) (Entered: 07/06/2005)

8884 Supplemental Motion In Compliance with Court Order filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Executive Orer No.: OE−2005−49)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 07/06/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 391 of 513

07/14/2005 07/14/2005 07/15/2005 07/15/2005 07/15/2005 07/15/2005
07/18/2005 07/21/2005 08/02/2005 08/02/2005 08/03/2005 08/04/2005 08/04/2005 08/04/2005 08/04/2005 08/04/2005 08/11/2005 08/15/2005 08/18/2005

8886 ORDER noted 8876 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 7/13/05. (mt, ) (Entered: 07/14/2005)
8887 ORDER noted 8884 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 7/13/05. (mt, ) (Entered: 07/14/2005)
8888 ORDER approving 8885 Invoice number 7/05 in the amount of $72,358.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD for the month of June 2005. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/13/05. (ft, ) (Entered: 07/15/2005)
8889 ORDER approving 8877 Invoice number 13203A in the amount of $9,000 payable to MGT of America as due amount for services, February 2005. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/13/05. (ft, ) (Entered: 07/15/2005)
8890 ORDER granting 8879 Motion Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services. The Clerk shall issue a check payable to Nancy I. Boneta in the amount of $10,125.00 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/13/05. (ft, ) (Entered: 07/15/2005)
8891 MOTION requesting Order for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Auditors' Report for FY 2003−2004)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/15/2005)
8893 ORDER approving 8869 Invoice #13382 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/15/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 07/18/2005)
8897 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amt of $1,275,000.00 in the name of Civil Action and Education Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/19/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 07/21/2005)
8898 Invoice number PAC−2004−2 in the amount of $348,210.04 payable to Prodecen, Inc. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/03/2005)
8899 ORDER approving 8898 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/03/2005)
8900 Invoice number 13587 in the amount of $414,292.36 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 08/03/2005)
8901 ORDER approving 8882 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/04/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER noted 8109 Motion for order to hold defts in contempt . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/04/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER noted 7956 Motion requesting termination of FRP program and office . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/04/2005)
ENDORSED ORDER noted 7969 Opposition to defts' motion requesting termination of FRP Program and Office . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/04/2005)
8902 Invoice number 8/05 in the amount of $65,699 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/05/2005)
8903 ORDER APPROVING 8902 Invoice for the month of July 2005, in the amt of $65,699.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/8/2005. (cm, ) (Entered: 08/11/2005)
8904 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Management Agreement filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 08/15/2005)
8905 ORDER for AOC to file, on or before noon 8/19/05, a duly executed agreement . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/18/05. (ni, ) (Modified on 8/19/2005 to correct Deadline for filing of agreement; noon 8/19/05)(ni, ). (Entered: 08/18/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 392 of 513

08/18/2005 08/22/2005 08/22/2005
08/22/2005 08/31/2005 09/01/2005 09/02/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/06/2005 09/21/2005 09/26/2005

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 8905 Order (Correct Deadline for filing of agreement is noon 8/19/05). (ni, ) (Entered: 08/19/2005)

8906 ORDER noted 8904 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/18/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/22/2005)

8907

MOTION for Leave to Appear Law Firm − Quinones, Sanchez & Guzman, PSC, MOTION to Withdraw Law Firm − Sanchez, Betances & Sifre, PSC Attorney as to Gerardo De−Jesus−Annoni filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/6/2005 (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 08/22/2005)

8908 MOTION Submitting Executed Management Agreement between CHSC and AOC filed byGerardo De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (Attachments: # 1)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 08/22/2005)

8909 ORDER for AOC to provide information re: a) Budget; b) Budgetary Shortfall and c) Monitoring Reports . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/29/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/31/2005)

8910 STATEMENTS of Revenues and Expenses, w/attachments, by FILIUS Institute. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/02/2005)

8911 Invoice number 13623 in the amount of $363,847.90 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 09/02/2005)

8912 Invoice number 21583 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8913 ORDER for payment of 8912 Invoice #21583 to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300 for the month of March, 2005 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8914 Invoice number 21815 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8915 ORDER for payment of 8914 Invoice #21815 to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300 for the month of April, 2005 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8916 Invoice number 22055 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8917 ORDER for payment of 8916 Invoice 22055 to RSM ROC & Co. in the amt of $2,300 for the month of May, 2005. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8918 Invoice number 22199 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8919 ORDER for payment of 8918 Invoice #22199 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of June, 2005 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8920 Invoice number 22284 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8921 ORDER for payment of 8920 Invoice # 22284 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of July, 2005 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/2/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/07/2005)

8922 Invoice number 9/05 in the amount of $75,564.00 payable to Curnyn Consult for the month of July, 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/13/2005)

8923 ORDER noted 8779 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/21/05. (ba, ) (Entered: 09/21/2005)

8924 MOTION to dismiss as to Rosa Perez Perdomo filed byCarlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Rosa Perez Perdomo Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/11/2005 (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Entered: 09/26/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 393 of 513

09/27/2005 09/28/2005 09/29/2005 10/04/2005 10/10/2005
10/12/2005 10/14/2005
10/14/2005 10/14/2005
10/21/2005 10/24/2005 10/24/2005 10/28/2005
11/02/2005 11/08/2005 11/16/2005 11/17/2005
11/18/2005 11/23/2005 11/23/2005 11/23/2005

8925 Invoice number 22440 in the amount of $$2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of July 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/28/2005)
8926 ORDER approving 8922 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/26/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/28/2005)
8928 ORDER approving 8900 Invoice #8900 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/27/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/29/2005)
8929 Invoice number 13720 in the amount of $363,789.85 payable to MGT of America for the month of August 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/04/2005)
8930 MOTION Submitting Invoice for Consulting Services filed byEsther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Invoice# 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 10/10/2005)
8932 Invoice number 10/05 in the amount of $74,048.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd for the month of September 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/14/2005)
8933 ORDER granting 8930 Motion submitting Invoice for consulting services of Nancy Boneta Lopez in the amount of $4,200. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/14/2005)
8934 ORDER approving 8911 Invoice #13623 for MGT in the amount of $363,847.00 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/14/2005)
8935 ORDER approving 8925 Invoice No. 22440 in the amount of $2,300 to RSM ROC & Co . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/13/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/14/2005)
8936 Invoice number 13791 in the amount of $369,962.98 for the month of September 2005 payable to MGT of America. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/24/2005)
8938 ORDER approving 8932 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/21/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/24/2005)
8939 ORDER approving 8929 Invoice 13720 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/21/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/24/2005)
8941 MOTION to dismiss as to the Secretary of Health, filed by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Rosa Perez Perdomo Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/10/2005 (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) Modified on 3/6/2006 to eliminate "as to all plaintiffs". (ni, ). (Entered: 10/28/2005)
8943 Invoice number 11/05 in the amount of $60,288 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of October 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/03/2005)
8944 Invoice number 22665 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of August 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/09/2005)
8945 ORDER for payment of 8944 Invoice to RSM ROC in the amount of $2,300 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/18/2005)
8946 ORDER approving the Correctional Health Services Corp. Budget for the remainder of fiscal year 2005−2006 and transfer of funds in the amount of $10,887,478.00 to Banco Santander . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/18/2005)
8947 Invoice number 13863 in the amount of $377,054.80 payable to MGT of America for the month of October 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/18/2005)
8948 ORDER modifying 8946 Order, . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/21/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/23/2005)
8949 ORDER approving 8936 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/21/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/23/2005)
8950 ***FILED IN ERROR, See Dkt #8951*** ORDER approving 8943 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/21/05. (ni, ) Modified on 11/23/2005 (ni, ). (Entered: 11/23/2005)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 394 of 513

11/23/2005 11/23/2005 12/05/2005 12/05/2005
12/06/2005
12/07/2005 12/07/2005 12/13/2005 12/13/2005 01/03/2006 01/10/2006 01/23/2006
01/23/2006 01/24/2006 01/26/2006 01/31/2006 02/02/2006 02/03/2006 02/03/2006

8951 ORDER approving 8943 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/21/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/23/2005)

8952 Invoice number 22722 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC for the month of September 2005. (ni, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 11/28/2005 − pdf document of Invoice. (ni, ). (Entered: 11/28/2005)

8953 MOTION for Hearing Status Conference in chambers filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/05/2005)

8954 Motion In Compliance Paragraph 44 Of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Request for Leave to File in Spanish filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 12/05/2005)

8955 BY ORDER OF THE COURT re 8953 MOTION for Hearing Status Conference in
chambers filed by All Plaintiffs: Status Conference set for 12/13/2005 @ 09:30 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. . Signed by Clerk on
12/6/05. (ja, ) (Entered: 12/06/2005)

8956 ORDER approving 8952 Invoice for payment . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/5/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/07/2005)

8957 ORDER noted 8954 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/7/05. (ba, ) (Entered: 12/07/2005)

8958 Invoice number 12/05 in the amount of $52,822.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) (Entered: 12/13/2005)

8959 ORDER re 8958 Invoice. Clerk to issue check in the amt of $52,822.00 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/9/05. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/13/2005)

8960 Invoice number 13940 in the amount of $357,034.64 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 01/03/2006)

8961 Invoice number 1/06 in the amount of $58,916.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) (Entered: 01/11/2006)

8964

Motion In Compliance WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING AND REQUEST FOR LEAVE TO FILE IN SPANISH filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 01/23/2006)

8965 Invoice number 22918 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)

8966 Invoice number 14004 in the amount of $379,600.68 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 01/24/2006)

8967 Invoice number 23045 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 01/27/2006)

8968 ORDER for the Clerk to issue check payable to Civil Action and Education Corporation in the amount of $1,299,341.00 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/27/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/31/2006)

8969 ORDER noted 8964 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 2/1/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 02/02/2006)

8970 ORDER approving payment of 8947 Invoice in the amount of $377,054.80 payable to MGT of America . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/1/6. (nivea, ) (Entered: 02/03/2006)

8971 ORDER approving 8961 Invoice in the amount of $58,916.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/1/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/03/2006)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 395 of 513

02/03/2006 02/03/2006 02/07/2006 02/15/2006 02/15/2006 02/23/2006 02/27/2006
02/28/2006 03/03/2006 03/03/2006
03/03/2006
03/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/03/2006

8972 ORDER approving 8965 Invoice in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/1/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/03/2006)

8973 ORDER approving 8967 Invoice in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/1/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/03/2006)

8974 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding the Accreditation of the Correctional Officers? Training Academy by the American Correctional Association filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Accreditation)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 02/07/2006)

8975 MOTION Motion in Compliance with Stipulation and its Paragraph 44 filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 02/15/2006)

8976 Invoice number 2/06 in the amount of $56,864.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) (Entered: 02/16/2006)

8977 ORDER approving 8976 Invoice in the amt of $56,864.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/17/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/23/2006)

8978

MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Secretary of Corrections Hon. Miguel Pereira Castillo Should Not Be Held In Contempt of Court and Punished as to Carlos Morales−Feliciano filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I# 2 Exhibit II# 3 Exhibit III# 4 Exhibit IV# 5 Exhibit V# 6 Exhibit VI)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 02/27/2006)

8979 Invoice number 23285 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of December 2005. (ni, ) (Entered: 02/28/2006)

8980 ORDER for payment of 8979 Invoice in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/2/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8981

ORDER noted 8826 INFORMATIVE motion, noted 8838 Motion submitting, noted 8855 INFORMATIVE motion, noted 8865 INFORMATIVE motion, noted 8867 Motion submitting, approved 8883 Motion In Compliance, granting 8891 Motion requesting Order, granting 8907 Motion for Leave to Appear, granting 8907 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney, noted 8908 Motion submitting . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (ba, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8982

MOTION Submitting English Version of Exhibits II, III, IV and VI re: 8978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Secretary of Corrections Hon. Miguel Pereira Castillo Should Not Be Held In Contempt of Court and Punished as to Carlos Morales−Feliciano filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibits II, III, IV and VI)(Related document(s) 8978 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8983 ORDER noted 8974 INFORMATIVE motion, noted 8975 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8984 ORDER: GRANTED AND SO ORDERED re 8924 Motion Requesting Dismissal of the Case With Respect to the Secretary of Health . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8985 ORDER granting 8941 Motion to Dismiss . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8986 ORDER NOTED re 8865 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo,, Anibal Acevedo Vila, . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8987 ORDER NOTED re 8867 MOTION Submitting Health Care Agreement re: 8864 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 396 of 513

03/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/03/2006 03/06/2006
03/06/2006 03/06/2006 03/06/2006 03/07/2006 03/08/2006 03/09/2006
03/10/2006 03/14/2006 03/16/2006 03/16/2006 03/17/2006

Issues filed by Anibal Acevedo Vila,, 8865 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Global Agreement Concerning Health Care Issues filed by Mi filed by Anibal Acevedo Vila, . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8988 ORDER NOTED re 8870 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8989 ORDER NOTED re 8871 Objection to filed by Anibal Acevedo Vila, . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8991 ORDER granting re 8982 Motion To File English Version of Exhibits II, III, IV and VI . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/03/2006)

8992 ***VACATED & SET ASIDE as per dkt #8997*** ORDER approving 8838 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services in the amount of $19,725 payable to Nancy Boneta. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (ni, ) Modified on 3/8/2006 (ni, ). (Entered: 03/06/2006)

8993 ORDER approving 8960 Invoice number 13940 in the amount of $357,034.64 payable to MGT of America . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/06/2006)

8994 ORDER approving 8966 Invoice number 14004 in the amount of $379,600.68 payable to MGT of America . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/06/2006)

8995 ORDER NOTED re 8883 Motion In Compliance with Court Order filed by Corrections Administration . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/07/2006)

8996 ORDER approving the transfer of the remaining approved operational budget funds for the fiscal year 2005−2006 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/3/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/07/2006)

8997 ORDER VACATING AND SETTING ASIDE DOCKET 8992 PREVIOUSLY APPROVED ON APRIL 18, 2005 8851 . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/8/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/08/2006)

8998 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE as to defendant Miguel Pereira, Sec. of Corrections:
Show Cause Hearing set for 3/20/2006 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on
3/9/06. (ja, ) (Entered: 03/09/2006)

8999 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed byEsther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I− Invoices# 2 Exhibit II− Proposed Order)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 03/10/2006)

9000 Invoice number 3/06 in the amount of $56,408 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of February 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/15/2006)

9001 ORDER Vacating re 8996 Order, . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 3/16/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/16/2006)

9002 ORDER approving the transfer of funds for fiscal year 2005−2006 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/15/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/16/2006)

9003

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo Re: 8978 MOTION for Order to Show Cause Why Defendant Secretary of Corrections Hon. Miguel Pereira Castillo Should Not Be Held In Contempt of Court and Punished as to Carlos Morales−Feliciano filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Amended Classification Manual# 2 Appendix I−1) A APENDICE Formulario de Evaluaci?n de Confinados e Instr# 3 Appendix II−2) B APENDICE Formulario de Ingreso e Instrucciones# 4 Appendix III−3) C APENDICE Formulario de Evaluaci?n de Confinados e

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 397 of 513

03/20/2006
03/21/2006 03/21/2006 03/21/2006 03/21/2006 03/27/2006 04/03/2006 04/03/2006 04/06/2006 04/06/2006
04/06/2006 04/07/2006
04/10/2006 04/21/2006

Instrucciones# 5 Appendix IV−4−1) D1 Instrucciones Sumariado# 6 Appendix V−4) D1 APENDICE PLANILLA INICIAL SUMARIADO# 7 Appendix VI−5−1) D1, ANEJO 2 ESCALA DE GRAVEDAD DEL DELITO CODIGO PENAL# 8 Appendix VII−5−2) D1, ANEJO 3 ESCALA SEVERIDAD DISCIPLINARIA# 9 Appendix VIII−5) D1, ANEJO 1 ESCALA DE GRAVEDAD DEL DELITO# 10 Appendix IX−6−1) D−2 APENDICE Intrucciones Casos Sentenciados# 11 Appendix X−6) D2 PLANILLA INICIAL SENTENCIADO# 12 Appendix XI−7_ E1 FORMULARIO NECESIDADES EDUCATIVAS# 13 Appendix XII−8_ Ap?ndice E−2# 14 Appendix XIII−9_ F APENDICE FORMULARIO APELACION CLASIFICACION# 15 Appendix XIV−10−1_ G−1 INTRUCCIONES FORMULARIO RECLASIFICACION# 16 Appendix XV−10_ G1 PLANILLA SUMARIADO# 17 Appendix XVI−11−1) G−2 ESCALA RECLASIFICACION DE CUSTODIA (CASOS SENTENCI# 18 Appendix XVII−11_ G2 PLANILLA SENTENCIADOS)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 03/17/2006)
9004 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Show
Cause Hearing held on 3/20/2006, Set Deadlines. Arguments heard.Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 4/20/2006. Response to Motion Deadline due by 4/20/2006. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (sr, ) (Entered:
03/21/2006)
9005 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $18,262.50 to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez. re: 8999 Invoice #68 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/20/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/21/2006)
9006 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $56,408.00 to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. re: Invoice #3/06 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/20/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/21/2006)
9007 Invoice number 14077 in the amount of $338,077.59 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 03/21/2006)
9008 TRANSCRIPT of Proceedings of OSC held on 3/20/06 before Judge Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter: Joyce del Valle. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/22/2006)
9009 Invoice number 23400 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 03/27/2006)
9010 ORDER approving for payment 9009 Invoice . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/31/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/03/2006)
9011 Invoice number 14183 in the amount of $375,538.59 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 04/03/2006)
9012 Invoice number 4/06 in the amount of $62,523.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) (Entered: 04/06/2006)
9013 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Miguel Pereira Castillo (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Staffing Pattern)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 04/06/2006)
9014 Motion In Compliance with Order Regarding Population Capacities filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Miguel Pereira Castillo (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 04/06/2006)
9015 MOTION to Clarify Motion in Compliance with Paragraph 44 of The Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 04/07/2006)
9016 ORDER noted 9013 Motion In Compliance, noted 9014 Motion In Compliance, noted 9015 Motion to clarify . Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 4/10/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 04/10/2006)
9019 ORDER the Clerk of the Court to issue a check in the amt of $62,523 from the fine funds under the court's control to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/20/06. (np, ) (Entered: 04/21/2006)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 398 of 513

04/28/2006
05/01/2006 05/02/2006 05/04/2006 05/09/2006 05/23/2006 05/23/2006 06/06/2006 06/12/2006 07/06/2006 07/10/2006 07/11/2006
07/11/2006 07/21/2006 07/21/2006 07/26/2006
08/08/2006 08/15/2006
08/16/2006 08/16/2006

9021 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 43 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing and Order Regarding Population Capacities filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 04/28/2006)
9022 ORDER noted 9021 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/1/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 05/01/2006)
9023 Invoice number 23542 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of February 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/02/2006)
9024 Invoice number 14257 in the amount of $383,970.47 payable to MGT of America for the month of March 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/04/2006)
9025 Invoice number 5/06 in the amount of $65,564.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of April 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/10/2006)
9026 ORDER the Clerk of the Court is to issue check payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd in the amt of $65,564.00 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/22/06. (np, ) (Entered: 05/23/2006)
9027 ORDER re: granting 9011 Invoice for the month of Feb 2006, payment #38 in the amt of $375,538.59 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/22/06. (np, ) (Entered: 05/23/2006)
9028 Invoice number 6/06 in the amount of $70,132 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) (Entered: 06/07/2006)
9029 Invoice number 14339 in the amount of $$363,789.42 payable to MGT of America (ft, ) (Entered: 06/13/2006)
9031 Invoice number 14436 in the amount of $357,099.70 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 07/07/2006)
9033 ORDER approving payment for 9028 Invoice number 6/06 in the amount of $70,132 payable to Curnyn Consulting . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/6/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 07/10/2006)
9035 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 CAEC Financial Statements 2004−2005)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/11/2006)
9036 Invoice number 07/06 in the amount of $86,511.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) (Entered: 07/13/2006)
9037 Letter from Correctional Health Services Corp. requesting transfer of funds. (ni, ) (Entered: 07/21/2006)
ORDER re: 9037 for the Clerk to transfer $1,500,000 to the Account of Correctional Health Services Corporation at Banco Santander . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/21/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 07/21/2006)
9038 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed byEsther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I−Invoices February−April 2006# 2 Exhibit II−May 2006 Invoice# 3 Exhibit III−June 2006 Invoice# 4 Exhibit IV−Proposed Order)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 07/26/2006)
9039 Invoice number 8/06 in the amount of $$80,300.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd (ni, ) (Entered: 08/09/2006)
9040 ORDER setting meeting for 8/23/2006 @ 04:00 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on
8/15/06. (ja, ) (Entered: 08/15/2006)
9041 ORDER granting in toto 9038 Motion submitting invoices for consulting services. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/15/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/16/2006)
9042 ORDER for clerk to issue check in the amt of $80,300.00 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. re: dkt #9039. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/14/06. (ni, ) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 399 of 513

08/16/2006 08/16/2006 08/16/2006 08/16/2006 08/17/2006
08/18/2006 08/18/2006 08/18/2006 08/18/2006 08/18/2006
08/21/2006 08/22/2006 08/24/2006 08/25/2006 08/28/2006 08/28/2006
08/28/2006

08/16/2006)

9043 ORDER for clerk to issue check in the amt of $86,511.00 to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. re: dkt #9036 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/14/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/16/2006)

9044 Invoice number 23744 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of April 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/16/2006)

9045 Invoice number 24072 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of May 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/16/2006)

9046 Invoice number 24145 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of June 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/16/2006)

9047

ERRATA ORDER re 9043 Order of Distribution of Funds for Clerk of Court to issue check in the amount of $86,511.00, payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., re docket # 9036 , should read: Pending before the Court is a Statement of Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for the month of May 2006. The same is hereby corrected to change the month indicated from July to May 2006. IT IS SO ORDERED . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/17/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 08/17/2006)

9048 ORDER approving 9024 to pay MGT of America the amount of $383,970.47 for the month of March 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/17/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/18/2006)

9049 ORDER re: 9044 for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amount of $2,300 for the month of April 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/17/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/18/2006)

9050 ORDER re: 9045 for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amount of $2,300 for the month of May 2006. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/17/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/18/2006)

9051 ORDER re: 9046 for payment of services to RSM ROC & Co. in the amount of $2,300 for the month of June 2006. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/17/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/18/2006)

9052

MOTION to Amend/Correct (Joint) Order of February 10, 2003 Entitled "To Finance from Fine Funds the AOC's Project for the Implementation of the MGT Report" filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of Corrections Administration Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/31/2006 (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 08/18/2006)

9053 ORDER re: 9035 Motion for Disbursement of Funds in the name of The Civil Action and Educational Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/18/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/21/2006)

9055 Letter for the creation of an escrow account in the amount of $2,000,000, by Correctional Health Services Corp. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006)

9056 ORDER approving 9055 for the creation of an escrow account in the amount of $2,000,000 for Correctional Health Services Corp. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/23/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/25/2006)

9054 NOTICE of Appearance by Eileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 08/25/2006)

9058 LETTER for Disbursement of Funds, filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)

9059 ORDER re 9058 Motion for Disbursement of Funds . The Clerk shall proceed to make a check payable to Correctional Health Services Corporation in the amount of $1,000,000.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/28/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)

9060 ERRATA ORDER re 9059 Order for Disbursement of Funds for Clerk to issue check in the amount of $1,000,000.00, payable to Correctional Health Services Corporation re 9058 . The Order should read: The Clerk shall proceed to transfer the

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 400 of 513

08/31/2006 09/05/2006 09/06/2006 09/06/2006 09/15/2006
09/18/2006 09/18/2006 09/18/2006 09/18/2006 09/21/2006 09/26/2006 10/03/2006 10/04/2006 10/20/2006
10/20/2006
10/23/2006 10/23/2006

amount of $1,000,000.00 to the account of Correctional Health Services Corporation at Banco Santander . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/28/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 08/28/2006)
9061 Invoice number 14502 in the amount of $346,528.45 payable to MGT of America, Inc. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/05/2006)
9063 Invoice number 9/06 in the amount of $85,371.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting (ni, ) (Entered: 09/06/2006)
9064 Invoice number 24298 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 09/06/2006)
9065 ORDER approving transfer of administrative budget to Correctional Health Services Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/6/06. (nivea, ) (Entered: 09/07/2006)
9068 ORDER: GRANTED AND SO ORDERED re 9052 Joint Motion Requesting Amendment to the Court Order of February 10, 2003 entitled "To Finance From Fine Funds the AOC's Project for the Implementation of the MGT Report" . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/15/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 09/15/2006)
9069 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds to RSM ROC & Company in the amount of $2,300 for the month of June 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/10/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/18/2006)
9070 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds to Curnyn Consulting LTD in the amount of $85,371.00 for the month of August 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9.15.06. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/18/2006)
9071 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds to MGT of America in the amount of $363,789.42 for the month of April 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/15/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/18/2006)
9072 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds to MGT of America in the amount of $357,099.70 for the month of May 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/15/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/18/2006)
9073 Invoice number 14585 in the amount of $$340,114.31 payable to MGT of America for the month of July 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/21/2006)
9075 Invoice number 24382 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/27/2006)
9076 Invoice number 14651 in the amount of $352,117.21 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 10/03/2006)
9077 Invoice number 10/06 in the amount of $84,091.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for the month of September 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/17/2006)
9079 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving dkt 9061 in the amount of $346,528.45, Invoice #14502 payable to MGT of America covering the month of June 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/19/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/20/2006)
9080 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving dkt 9073 in the amount of $340,114.31, Invoice #14585 payable to MGT of America covering the month of July 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/19/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/20/2006)
9081 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds from the approved budget of Correctional Health Services Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/20/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/23/2006)
9082 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds for payment of services to RSM ROC & Company in the amount of $2,300.00 for services during the month of August 2006. re: dkt 9075 . . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/20/06. (ni, ) Modified on 10/23/2006 to add dkt # of Invoice. (ni, ). (Entered: 10/23/2006)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 401 of 513

10/23/2006 11/06/2006 11/07/2006 11/08/2006 11/14/2006 11/14/2006 11/14/2006 11/14/2006 11/15/2006 12/05/2006 12/08/2006 12/08/2006 12/08/2006 12/08/2006
12/08/2006 12/12/2006 12/12/2006 12/13/2006

9083 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: dkt 9077 . Clerk shall issue a check in the amount of $84,091 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/20/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 10/23/2006)
9085 Invoice number 24644 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of August 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/06/2006)
9086 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding CLOSURE OF MORALES FELICIANO LITIGATION filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 11/07/2006)
9087 ORDER for payment of 9085 Invoice number 24644 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. for the month of August 2006. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/6/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/08/2006)
9088 Invoice number 14733 in the amount of $361,009.01 payable to MGT of America for the month of September 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/14/2006)
9089 Invoice number 11/06 in the amount of $67,026.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of October 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/14/2006)
9090 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds payable to Curnyn Consulting in the amount of $67,026.00 re: 9089 Invoice 11/06 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/8/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 11/14/2006)
9091 Minute: In Chambers Conference is hereby set for 12/11/2006 at 04:30 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (ja, ) (Entered:
11/14/2006)
9092 Minute: At request of counsel, In Chambers Conference is reset for 12/12/2006 at 04:00 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (ja, )
(Entered: 11/15/2006)
9093 Invoice number 12/06 in the amount of $73,170 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of November 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/08/2006)
9094 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9093 Invoice number 12/06 in the amount of $73,170 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of November 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/7/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/08/2006)
9095 ORDER approving disbursement of funds from the approved budget of Correctional Health Services Corporation. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/7/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/08/2006)
9096 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9076 Invoice number 14651 in the amount of $352,117.21 payable to MGT of America . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/7/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/08/2006)
9097 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9088 Invoice number 14733 in the amount of $361,009.01 payable to MGT of America for the month of September 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/7/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/08/2006)
9098 Minute: By Order of the Court, the Meeting in Chambers has been reset for 12/12/2006 at 02:30 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.
(ja, ) (Entered: 12/12/2006)
9099 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Designation of Alternate Lead Counsel filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/12/2006)
9100 ORDER noted 9099 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/12/06. (ba, ) (Entered: 12/12/2006)
9101 Invoice number 24708 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of September 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/13/2006)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 402 of 513

12/14/2006 12/14/2006 12/15/2006
12/15/2006
12/18/2006
12/18/2006 12/20/2006 12/22/2006 12/26/2006 12/27/2006 01/10/2007 01/12/2007 01/25/2007
01/25/2007 01/25/2007 01/30/2007 01/31/2007

9102 Invoice number 14771 in the amount of $353,935.55 payable to MGT of America for the month of October 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/14/2006)

9103 ORDER noted 9086 Informative Motion Concerning Closure of Morales Feliciano Litigation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/14/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 12/14/2006)

9104 MOTION Submitting External Audit Report of the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CAEC Financial Statements June 30, 2006)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/15/2006)

9105

***FILED IN ERROR, INCOMPLETE PDF*** Joint MOTION requesting Order Approving Contract and Funds Therefor filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Professional Services Contract# 2 Exhibit Extension of Professional Services Contract)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) Modified on 12/18/2006 (ni, ). (Entered: 12/15/2006)

9106

Joint MOTION requesting Order Approving Contract Extension and Funds Therefor and in Substitution of Docket 9105 filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Professional Services Contract# 2 Exhibit Extension of Professional Services Contract)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 12/18/2006)

9107 ORDER granting 9106 Joint Motion Requesting Approval of Contract Extension and Funds . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/18/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 12/18/2006)

9108 ORDER approving 9101 Invoice number 24708 for payment to RSM ROC & Company in the amount of $2,300 for the month of September 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/13/06. (ni, ) (Entered: 12/21/2006)

9109 ORDER noted re 9104 Motion To Submit External Audit Report of The Civil Action and Education Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/22/06. (mt, ) (Entered: 12/22/2006)

9114 Invoice number 24916 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company (jms, ) (Entered: 01/22/2007)

9110 ORDER approving disbursement of funds from the approved budget of Correctional Health Services Corporation. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/22/06. (ov, ) (Entered: 12/27/2006)

9111 Invoice number 14886 in the amount of $361,820.75 payable to MGT of America for the month of November 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/10/2007)

9112 Invoice number 1/07 in the amount of $71,771.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. for the month of December 2006. (ni, ) (Entered: 01/12/2007)

9115 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9112 Invoice number 1/07 in the amount of $71,771.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. for the month of December 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/23/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 01/25/2007)

9116 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9114 Invoice number 24916 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/23/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 01/25/2007)

9117 Invoice number 24955 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company (jms, ) (Entered: 01/26/2007)

9118 NOTICE OF SERVICE by all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 01/30/2007)

9119 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed byEsther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 01/31/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 403 of 513

01/31/2007 02/01/2007 02/02/2007 02/02/2007 02/06/2007 02/07/2007
02/09/2007
02/09/2007 02/09/2007 02/09/2007 02/21/2007 02/27/2007
02/27/2007 03/05/2007
03/08/2007
03/08/2007
03/13/2007

9120 MOTION Regarding the Road to Closure filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 01/31/2007)
9121 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Notice of Service filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of Miguel Pereira Castillo (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 02/01/2007)
9122 ORDER noted re 9121 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/1/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 02/02/2007)
9123 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Submission of Documents to Plaintiffs Class filed byWilliam A. Graffam on behalf of MGT of America (Graffam, William) (Entered: 02/02/2007)
9125 Invoice number 2/07 in the amount of $77,239.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of January 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 02/07/2007)
9126 RESPONSE to Motion filed by all plaintiffs Re: 9121 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Notice of Service filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter to Gerardo De Jesus Annoni, Esq.)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 02/07/2007)
9127 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9117 Invoice number 24955 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/7/07. (jms, ) Modified on 2/9/2007 to add text (jms, ). (Entered: 02/09/2007)
9128 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9125 Invoice number 2/07 in the amount of $77,239.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of January 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/7/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 02/09/2007)
9129 Invoice number 14942 in the amount of $344,796.88 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for the month of December 2006 (jms, ) (Entered: 02/09/2007)
9130 AMENDED ORDER re 9128 Order of Distribution of Funds. The Correct amount for the Clerk of Court to issue is $77,239.00 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/9/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 02/09/2007)
9131 ORDER Noted re 9126 Response to Motion filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/21/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 02/21/2007)
9132 MOTION for Extension of Time until March 9, 2007 to File Answer to Plaintiffs' "Interrogatories Regarding Roadmap to Closure" filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/12/2007 (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 02/27/2007)
9133 ***WITHDRAWN AS PER ORDER ON DKT #9155*** MOTION requesting Order filed by U.S. Probation (U.S. Probation Officer, Gonzalez) Modified on 3/30/2007 (ov, ). (Entered: 02/27/2007)
9134 MOTION to Appoint Counsel [RECOMMENDATION OF DESIGNATION OF JOINT LEAD COUNSEL] filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/19/2007 (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 03/05/2007)
9135 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 43 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing Order Regarding Population Capacities filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 03/08/2007)
9136 Motion In Compliance with Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing Order and Request for Leave to File in Spanish filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Staffing Pattern)(De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 03/08/2007)
9137 MOTION to Withdraw Legal Representation filed byGerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of all defendants (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 03/13/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 404 of 513

03/13/2007 03/13/2007 03/13/2007 03/13/2007 03/13/2007 03/13/2007 03/14/2007
03/14/2007
03/15/2007 03/20/2007 03/20/2007 03/20/2007 03/23/2007 03/28/2007 03/28/2007 03/29/2007 03/29/2007 03/29/2007 03/29/2007

9138 ORDER finding as moot 9132 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/12/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/13/2007)
9139 ORDER granting 9134 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Appointed Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina for All Plaintiffs and Carlos Morales−Feliciano . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/12/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/13/2007)
9140 ORDER noted 9135 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/12/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/13/2007)
9141 ORDER noted 9136 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/12/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/13/2007)
9144 Invoice number 3/07 in the amount of $65,507.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of February 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 03/14/2007)
9145 Invoice number 25143 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company (jms, ) (Entered: 03/14/2007)
9142 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9102 Invoice number 14771 in the amount of $353,935.55 payable to MGT of America for the month of October 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/12/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/14/2007)
9143 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9111 Invoice number 14886 in the amount of $361,820.75 payable to MGT of America for the month of November 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/12/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/14/2007)
9146 Invoice number 15014 in the amount of $367,174.34 payable to MGT of America (ni, ) (Entered: 03/16/2007)
9147 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9144 Invoice number 3/07 in the amount of $65,507.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of February 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/16/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/20/2007)
9148 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9145 Invoice number 25143 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/16/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/20/2007)
9149 MOTION to Withdraw filed by U.S. Probation (U.S. Probation Officer, Gonzalez) (Entered: 03/20/2007)
9150 ORDER approving Disbursement of Funds from the approved budget of Civil Action and Education Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/22/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/23/2007)
9151 ORDER approving the Transfer of Funds from the approved budget of Correctional Health Services Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/26/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 03/28/2007)
9152 MOTION for Hearing [Status Conference] filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 03/28/2007)
9153 Motion In Compliance With Paragraph 44 filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 03/29/2007)
9154 ORDER granting re 9137 Motion to Withdraw Legal Representation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/29/2007)
9155 ORDER granting re 9149 Motion to Withdraw . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/29/2007)
9156 ORDER re 9152 MOTION for Hearing [Status Conference] filed by All Plaintiffs:
Status Conference is hereby set for 4/20/2007 at 01:30 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez
on 3/29/07. (ja, ) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 405 of 513

03/29/2007 03/29/2007
03/30/2007
04/02/2007 04/03/2007 04/09/2007 04/11/2007 04/11/2007
04/16/2007 04/18/2007 04/20/2007 04/23/2007 04/24/2007 04/25/2007
04/25/2007 04/27/2007 05/01/2007 05/03/2007

9157 ORDER noted 9153 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

9158

MOTION Submitting Classification Manual filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Manual I# 2 Exhibit Manual II# 3 Exhibit Manual III# 4 Exhibit Manual IV# 5 Exhibit Appendix A# 6 Exhibit Appendix B# 7 Exhibit Appendix C# 8 Exhibit Appendix D1 pre−trial# 9 Exhibit Appendix D1# 10 Exhibit Appendix D1 Exhibit 1# 11 Exhibit Appendix D1 Exhibit 2# 12 Exhibit Appendix D2# 13 Exhibit Appendix E1# 14 Exhibit Appendix E2# 15 Exhibit Appendix F# 16 Exhibit Appendix G1# 17 Exhibit Appendix G2)(Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

9159 Minutes of Resetting: Upon request by counsel for MGT of America, the Status
Conference set for April 20, 2007 is hereby rescheduled for April 18, 2007. Status Conference reset for 4/18/2007 at 01:30 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (ja, ) (Entered: 03/30/2007)

9161 ORDER granting 9119 Motion submitting Invoices for Consulting Services . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/29/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 04/02/2007)

9162 Invoice number 4/07 in the amount of $64,920.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of March 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 04/04/2007)

9164 ORDER noted re 9158 Motion Submitting Inmates' Classification Manual . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/2/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 04/09/2007)

9165 Invoice number 25321 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company (jms, ) (Entered: 04/11/2007)

9166 Motion In Compliance With Paragraph 44 of the Stipulation filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Revised Staffing Pattern# 2 Exhibit Certification)(Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 04/11/2007)

9167 Invoice number 15066 in the amount of $411,447.77 payable to MGT of America for the month of February 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 04/16/2007)

9174 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Status Conference held on 4/18/2007. (ja, ) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

9169 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9165 Invoice number 25321 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/18/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 04/20/2007)

9170 ORDER noted 9166 Motion In Compliance . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/23/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 04/23/2007)

9171 AMENDED ORDER re 9169 Order of Distribution of Funds . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/23/07. (ni, ) (Entered: 04/24/2007)

9172 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9129 Invoice number 14942 in the amount of $344,796.88 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for the month of December 2006 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/23/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

9173 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9162 Invoice number 4/07 in the amount of $64,920.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of March 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/23/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 04/25/2007)

9175 AMENDED ORDER re 9151 ORDER approving the Transfer of Funds from the approved budget of Correctional Health Services Corporation . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/26/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 04/27/2007)

9176 Invoice number 15145 in the amount of $409,268.70 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for the month of March 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 05/02/2007)

9177 Invoice number 25455 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company (ni, ) (Entered: 05/03/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 406 of 513

05/03/2007 05/03/2007 05/04/2007 05/08/2007 05/15/2007 05/16/2007
05/17/2007 05/17/2007 05/17/2007 05/17/2007 05/18/2007 05/18/2007
05/18/2007 05/18/2007
05/18/2007 05/21/2007
05/21/2007

9178 NOTICE of Appearance of Luis A. Henriquez Carrero by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 05/03/2007)
9180 Invoice number 5/07 in the amount of $63,344.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of April 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 05/07/2007)
9179 ORDER Noted re 9178 Notice of Appearance filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/4/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 05/04/2007)
9181 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9177 Invoice number 25455 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/4/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 05/08/2007)
9182 NOTICE of Appearance by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/15/2007)
9183 MOTION requesting Order to Defendants to File Amendments to the Inmates' Classification Manual and for Other Purposes filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I# 2 Exhibit II)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 05/16/2007)
9184 ORDER NOTED re 9182 Notice of Appearance filed by all plaintiffs . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/07. (mt, ) Modified on 5/18/2007 to edit text (ov, ). (Entered: 05/17/2007)
9185 ORDER noted 9183 Motion requesting Order . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 05/17/2007)
9186 LETTER for Disbursement of Funds re: funding request for Correctional Medical Center, filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/17/2007)
9187 ORDER approving distribution of Funds for the Correctional Medical Center re: 9186 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/15/07. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/17/2007)
9188 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9180 Invoice number 5/07 in the amount of $63,344.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of April 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 05/18/2007)
9189 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9176 Invoice number 15145 in the amount of $409,268.70 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for the month of March 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 05/18/2007)
9190 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9146 Invoice number 15014 in the amount of $367,174.34 payable to MGT of America . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 05/18/2007)
9191 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9167 Invoice number 15066 in the amount of $411,447.77 payable to MGT of America for the month of February 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/17/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 05/18/2007)
9192 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 05/18/2007)
9193 ORDER GRANTED as requested. The Clerk shall proceed to issue a check, in the amount of $300,000.00, to the Corporation. re 9192 Motion for Disbursement of Funds . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/21/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 05/21/2007)
9194 ORDER granting 9183 MOTION requesting Order to Defendants to File Amendments to the Inmates' Classification Manual and for Other Purposes filed by
All Plaintiffs. Amendment to Manual due by 6/5/2007. . Signed by Judge
Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/18/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 05/21/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 407 of 513

05/24/2007 05/25/2007 05/26/2007 05/31/2007 05/31/2007
06/06/2007 06/11/2007
06/12/2007 06/13/2007 06/15/2007 06/21/2007
06/29/2007 07/02/2007

9195 MOTION requesting Order regarding the Announced Closure of the Rio Piedras Complex filed byGuillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of all plaintiffs (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/24/2007)

9196 Motion In Compliance PURSUANT TO ORDER REGARDING filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/25/2007)

9197 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed byEsther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 # 2)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 05/26/2007)

9198 Invoice number 25694 in the amount of $$2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co. (ni, ) (Entered: 05/31/2007)

9199

MOTION to Withdraw Document MOTION PURSUANT TO ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES re: 9196 Motion In Compliance PURSUANT TO ORDER REGARDING filed by Rafael Hernandez−Colon,, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos,, Lorenzo Villalba,, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez,, Juanita Gomez,, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez,, Isabel Suliveres,, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata,, Heriberto Acevedo,, Julio Acevedo−Asencio,, Julio Garcia−Garcia,, Julian O. McConnie,, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos,, Carlos Romero−Barcelo,, Irba Cruz de Batista,, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez,, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero,, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone,, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana,, Johnny Colon,, Zoraida Buxo,, Carmen Feliciano,, Nestor Galarza,, Aixa Mariano,, Enrique Garcia−Garcia,, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez,, Johnny Rullan,, Sila M. Calderon,, Miguel Pereira Castillo,, Anibal Acevedo Vila,, Rosa Perez Perdomo, filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Related document(s) 9196 ) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/31/2007)

9200 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9198 Invoice number 25694 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Co . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/5/07. (jms, ) (Entered: 06/06/2007)

9201

RESPONSE In Opposition to Motion filed by all defendants Re: 9195 MOTION requesting Order regarding the Announced Closure of the Rio Piedras Complex filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 6/19/2007 to correct title (ov, ). (Entered: 06/11/2007)

9202 Invoice number 6/07 in the amount of $69,710.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of May 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 06/13/2007)

9203 Invoice number 15228 in the amount of $402,517.15 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for the month of April 2007 (jms, ) (Entered: 06/13/2007)

9204 Motion In Compliance With Court Order Docket No. 9194 filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 06/15/2007)

9205

Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND INFORMATIVE MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 06/21/2007)

9206 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9197 Invoice for Consulting Services . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/28/07. (ni, ) (Entered: 06/29/2007)

9207

MOTION to Strike Re: 9158 MOTION Submitting Classification Manual filed by Rafael Hernandez−Colon,, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos,, Lorenzo Villalba,, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez,, Juanita Gomez,, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez,, Isabel Suliveres,, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata,, Heriberto Acevedo,, Julio Acevedo−Asencio,, Julio Garcia−Garcia,, Julian O. McConnie,, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos,, Carlos Romero−Barcelo,, Irba Cruz de Batista,, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez,, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero,, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone,, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana,, Johnny Colon,, Zoraida Buxo,, Carmen Feliciano,, Nestor Galarza,, Aixa Mariano,,

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 408 of 513

07/02/2007 07/03/2007
07/05/2007 07/06/2007 07/06/2007
07/10/2007 07/12/2007 07/19/2007 07/19/2007 07/20/2007 07/20/2007 07/23/2007

Enrique Garcia−Garcia,, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez,, Johnny Rullan,, Sila M. Calderon,, Miguel Pereira Castillo,, Anibal Acevedo Vila,, Rosa Perez Perdomo,, 9204 Motion In Compliance With Court Order Docket No. 9194 filed by Rafael Hernandez−Colon,, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos,, Lorenzo Villalba,, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez,, Juanita Gomez,, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez,, Isabel Suliveres,, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata,, Heriberto Acevedo,, Julio Acevedo−Asencio,, Julio Garcia−Garcia,, Julian O. McConnie,, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos,, Carlos Romero−Barcelo,, Irba Cruz de Batista,, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez,, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero,, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone,, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana,, Johnny Colon,, Zoraida Buxo,, Carmen Feliciano,, Nestor Galarza,, Aixa Mariano,, Enrique Garcia−Garcia,, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez,, Johnny Rullan,, Sila M. Calderon,, Miguel Pereira Castillo,, Anibal Acevedo Vila,, Rosa Perez Perdomo, filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/16/2007 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Related document(s) 9158 , 9204 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/02/2007)

9208 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/02/2007)

9209 Motion for Contempt and for the Levying of Fines Due to Defendants' Failure to Monitor and/or Comply with the Maximum Operational Capacity filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/16/2007 (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/03/2007)

9210 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Absence of Joint Lead Counsel filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/05/2007)

9211 ORDER noted 9210 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/6/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 07/06/2007)

9212 ORDER re 9035 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds. The Clerk shall issue a check in the name of the Civil Action and Education Corporation, in the amount of $336,565.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/6/2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/09/2007)

9219 Invoice number 7/07 in the amount of $60,065.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of June 2007, (cm, ) (Entered: 07/19/2007)

9214 Invoice number 25969 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of May 2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/12/2007)

9217 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9214 Invoice #25969 for professional services rendered during the month of May 2007 in the amount of $2,300.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/18/2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/19/2007)

9220 Invoice number #15312 in the amount of $374,471.86 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for services rendered during the month of May 2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/20/2007)

9221 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $60,065.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd., re: 9219 Invoice 7/07. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/19/2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 07/20/2007)

9290 LETTER/MOTION for Disbursement of Funds, filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (ni) (Entered: 10/25/2007)

9222

MOTION for extension of time until August 8, 2007 to TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS? MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND FOR LEVYING OF FINES DUE TO DEFENDANTS? FAILURE TO MONITOR AND/OR COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL CAPACITY filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/6/2007 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/23/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 409 of 513

07/23/2007
08/08/2007
08/08/2007
08/13/2007 08/15/2007 08/15/2007 08/22/2007 08/23/2007 08/23/2007 08/24/2007 08/24/2007 08/24/2007 08/24/2007

9223

MOTION for extension of time until August 8, 2007 to TO FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS? MOTION TO STRIKE DEFENDANTS? MOTION SUBMITTING INMATE?S CLASSIFICATION MANUAL (DKT. NO 9158) AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER DATED MAY 18, 2007 AT DOCKET 9194 (DKT. NO. 9204) filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/6/2007 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/23/2007)

9224

MOTION for Extension of Time until August 15, 2007 to file FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS? MOTION FOR CONTEMPT AND FOR LEVYING OF FINES DUE TO DEFENDANTS? FAILURE TO MONITOR AND/OR COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM OPERATIONAL CAPACITY filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/21/2007 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/08/2007)

9225

INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Classification Manual, MOTION for Extension of time until August 20, 2007 to file Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Motion Submitting Inmate's Classification Manual (DKT. NO 9158), and MOTION In Compliance with Order Dated May 18, 2007 at Dkt 9194 (DKT. NO. 9204) filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/21/2007 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 8/9/2007 to add event and text (ov, ). (Entered: 08/08/2007)

9226

Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND INFORMATIVE MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/13/2007)

9227

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by all defendants Re: 9209 Motion for Contempt and for the Levying of Fines Due to Defendants' Failure to Monitor and/or Comply with the Maximum Operational Capacity filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/15/2007)

9228 ORDER finding as moot re 9120 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, noted re 9123 INFORMATIVE motion, finding as moot re 9133 Motion requesting Order . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/15/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 08/15/2007)

9229 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding TRANSLATION OF INMATE CLASSIFICATION MANUAL filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/22/2007)

9230 MOTION for Leave to File Document Reply filed byGuillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of all plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/5/2007 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 08/23/2007)

9231 Motion for Contempt of the Court for the Use of Padlocks in the Housing Units, Cells, and Emergency Exits in Violation of the Court's Orders filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/5/2007 (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 08/23/2007)

9232 LETTER/MOTION for Disbursement of Funds, filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation.(ni, ) (Entered: 08/24/2007)

9233 ORDER approving 9232 Letter/Motion for Disbursement of remaining funds for the Correctional Medical Center. Clerk shall transfer the amount of $787,816.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/23/07. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/24/2007)

9234 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9203 Invoice number 15228 in the amount of $402,517.15 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for the month of April 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/23/07. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/24/2007)

9235 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9220 Invoice number #15312 in the amount of $374,471.86 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for services rendered during the month of May 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/23/07. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/24/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 410 of 513

08/28/2007 08/30/2007 08/31/2007 09/04/2007 09/05/2007 09/05/2007
09/05/2007 09/06/2007
09/07/2007 09/07/2007 09/07/2007
09/14/2007 09/14/2007 09/20/2007 09/25/2007

9236 ORDER granting 9208 Motion for Disbursement of Funds . Clerk shall issue check in the name of Civil Action and Education Corporation in the amount of $1,500,000.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/28/07. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/28/2007)

9237 Invoice number 15389 in the amount of $396,926.22 payable to MGT of America for the month of June 2007. (ni, ) (Entered: 08/30/2007)

9238 ORDER: Status Conference set for 9/11/2007 at 05:00 PM before
Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez
on 8/31/07. (ja, ) (Entered: 08/31/2007)

9239 Invoice number 9/07 in the amount of $66,944.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD (cm, ) (Entered: 09/05/2007)

9240 Invoice number 8/07 in the amount of $69,809.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd. for the month of July 2007. (ni, ) (Entered: 09/05/2007)

9241

***FILED IN ERROR*** Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 9/6/2007 (ni, ). (Entered: 09/05/2007)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 9241 Motion In Compliance (FILED IN ERROR, WRONG PDF) (ni, ) (Entered: 09/06/2007)

9242

Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 09/06/2007)

9243 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9240 Invoice payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for the month of July 2007 in the amount of $69,809.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/6/2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 09/07/2007)

9244 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9239 Invoice payable to Curnyn Consulting,Ltd., for the month of August 2007 in the amount of $66,944.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/6/2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 09/07/2007)

9245

MOTION for extension of time until September 25, 2007 to FILE OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS? MOTION FOR ORDER TO HOLD DEFENDANTS IN CONTEMPT OF THE COURT FOR THE USE OF PADLOCKS IN THE HOUSING UNITS, CELLS, AND EMERGENCY EXISTS IN VIOLATION OF THE COURT?S ORDERS (DOCKET 9231) filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/20/2007 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 09/07/2007)

9246 MOTION requesting Order to Use Photographic and Videotape Cameras in Facility Inspection filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 09/14/2007)

9247 ORDER Approving 9290 Letter submitting the Operational Budget and Transfer of Funds for the First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2007−2008 to The Correctional Health Services Corporaiton. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/12/2007. (cm, ) Modified on 10/25/2007 to create link to Letter. (ni). (Entered: 09/17/2007)

9248 Invoice number 15437 in the amount of $369,186.78 payable to MGT of America, Inc. (cm, ) (Entered: 09/20/2007)

9250

RESPONSE In Opposition to Motion filed by all defendants Re: 9246 MOTION requesting Order to Use Photographic and Videotape Cameras in Facility Inspection filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano,, Salvador Borta−Lebron,, All Plaintiffs, (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 9/26/2007 to correct title (ov, ). (Entered: 09/25/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 411 of 513

09/27/2007 10/02/2007
10/03/2007 10/03/2007 10/03/2007
10/03/2007 10/04/2007
10/04/2007 10/04/2007
10/09/2007 10/09/2007
10/09/2007 10/09/2007 10/09/2007 10/09/2007 10/09/2007 10/09/2007

9251 Invoice number 26506 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company (cm, ) (Entered: 09/27/2007)

9252

INFORMATIVE Motion regarding POPULATION CAPACITIES FOR THE RIO PIEDRAS PENAL COMPLEX PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH 43 and in Compliance w/Ct order filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 10/3/2007 to edit text (ov, ). (Entered: 10/02/2007)

9253 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 10/03/2007)

9254 ORDER granting re 9246 Motion requesting Order . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/3/07. (mt, ) (Entered: 10/03/2007)

9255 BY ORDER OF THE COURT re 9231 Motion for Contempt of the Court for the Use of Padlocks in the Housing Units, Cells, and Emergency Exits in Violation of the
Court's Orders filed All Plaintiffs. Contempt Hearing set for 10/15/2007 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. . Signed by Clerk
on 10/3/07. (ja, ) (Entered: 10/03/2007)

9256 Invoice number 10/07 in the amount of $69,635.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for expenses incurred during the month of September 2007. (cm, ) (Entered: 10/03/2007)

9257 Emergency MOTION for Protective Order filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/17/2007 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1# 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 10/04/2007)

9258 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 10/04/2007)

9259 MOTION for Sanctions as to Defendant−All filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/17/2007 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter 1 October 2007# 2 Exhibit Statement Under the Penalty of Perjury)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 10/04/2007)

9260 ORDER: GRANTED AND SO ORDERED. re 9258 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/9/07. (Entered: 10/09/2007)

9261

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion for sanctions filed by all defendants Re: 9246 MOTION requesting Order to Use Photographic and Videotape Cameras in Facility Inspection filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, 9259 MOTION for Sanctions as to Defendant−All filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, 9254 Order on Motion requesting Order (Entered: 10/09/2007)

9262 Invoice number 15495 in the amount of $382,283.94 payable to MGT of America, Inc. (cm) (Entered: 10/09/2007)

9263 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to CARLOS COLON−ESTELA for 10/15/07. (ct) (Entered: 10/09/2007)

9264 ***VACATED AS PER ORDER AT DKT #9270*** Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Jesus Rodriguez for 10/15/2007. (ct) Modified on 10/12/2007 (ov,). (Entered: 10/09/2007)

9265 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Luis Franco for 10/15/2007. (ct) (Entered: 10/09/2007)

9266 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Angel Caraballo Matos for 10/15/07. (ct) (Entered: 10/09/2007)

9267 MOTION to Strike Re: 9253 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 412 of 513

10/10/2007 10/10/2007 10/11/2007
10/11/2007
10/11/2007 10/11/2007 10/11/2007 10/11/2007 10/11/2007 10/11/2007 10/11/2007
10/11/2007

Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio filed byGuillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of all plaintiffsSuggestions in opposition/response due by 10/22/2007 (Related document(s) 9253 ) (Entered: 10/09/2007)

Notice of Manual Notification sent to USM re: 9263 , 9264 , 9265 and 9266 to (ct) (Entered: 10/10/2007)

9268 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9256 Invoice payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd.,. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/5/2007. (cm) (Entered: 10/10/2007)

9269

MOTION to Amend/Correct Petition of Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Re: 9258 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano filed byJose R. Roque−Velazquez on behalf of all plaintiffsSuggestions in opposition/response due by 10/29/2007 (Related document(s) 9258 ) (Roque−Velazquez, Jose) (Entered: 10/11/2007)

9270 ORDER granting re 9269 Amended Petition For Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum and
VACATING Order 9264 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on
10/11/07. (mt) (Entered: 10/11/2007)

9271 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Jesus Rodriguez Robles for 10/15/07. (ct) (Entered: 10/11/2007)

9272 MOTION to Set Aside THAT CONTEMPT HEARING BE VACATED filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment A# 2 Exhibit Attachment B)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 10/11/2007)

9274 ORDER re 9253 Motion to Quash : DENIED. Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/2007. (grf) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9275 ORDER re 9252 INFORMATIVE motion : NOTED. Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/2007. (grf) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9276 ORDER re 9257 Motion for Protective Order: DENIED. Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/2007. (grf) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9277 ORDER re 9267 Motion to Strike : DENIED.Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/2007. (grf) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9279

ORDER re 9250 Response to Motion, filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio : DENIED. Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/2007. (grf) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9280

ORDER re 9261 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 413 of 513

10/15/2007
10/15/2007 10/15/2007
10/16/2007 10/16/2007
10/17/2007 10/17/2007 10/17/2007 10/23/2007 10/29/2007 10/29/2007

Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio : DENIED.Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/11/2007. (grf) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9273

MOTION in Limine and, MOTION to Strike Re: 9272 MOTION to Set Aside THAT CONTEMPT HEARING BE VACATED filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio filed byGuillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of all plaintiffsSuggestions in opposition/response due by 11/1/2007 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Tom Jons' CV)(Related document(s) 9272 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9278 ORDER re 9272 Motion to Set Aside : DENIED. Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/15/2007. (grf) (Entered: 10/15/2007)

9284 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Motion Hearing held on 10/15/2007 re 9231 Motion for Contempt of the Court for the Use of Padlocks in the Housing Units, Cells, and Emergency Exits in Violation of the Court's Orders filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos
Morales−Feliciano. Further Motion Hearing is set for 10/16/2007 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter
Joyce del Valle.) (grf) (Entered: 10/17/2007)

9282 ORDER granting 9273 Motion in Limine; granting 9273 Motion to Strike . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/16/07. (ct) (Entered: 10/16/2007)

9283 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Motion Hearing held on 10/16/2007 re 9231 Motion for Contempt of the Court for the Use of Padlocks in the Housing Units, Cells, and Emergency Exits in Violation of the Court's Orders filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos
Morales−Feliciano. Further Motion Hearing set for 10/17/2007 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter Del Valle.)
(ct) (Entered: 10/17/2007)

9286

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez : Further Motion Hearing held on 10/17/2007 re 9231 Motion for Contempt of the Court for the Use of Padlocks in the Housing Units, Cells, and Emergency Exits in Violation of the Court's Orders filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano. Matter is submitted. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (sr) (Entered: 10/19/2007)

9287 Exhibit List by All Plaintiffs. (sr) (Entered: 10/19/2007)

9288 Exhibit List by Defendant−All. (sr) (Entered: 10/19/2007)

9289 MOTION Submitting Translations to Defendants Exhibits filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit Exhibit D# 3 Exhibit Exhibit E)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 10/23/2007)

9291 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9237 Invoice #15389 in the amount of $396,926.22 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for services covering the month of June 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/24/2007. (cm) . (Entered: 10/29/2007)

9292 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds approving 9248 Invoice #15437 in the amount of $369,186.78 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for services covering the month of July 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/24/2007. (cm)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 414 of 513

11/01/2007
11/06/2007
11/13/2007 11/21/2007 11/29/2007 11/29/2007 11/29/2007 11/29/2007 12/04/2007
12/05/2007 12/11/2007 12/11/2007 12/11/2007 12/11/2007 12/12/2007 12/12/2007 12/13/2007

(Entered: 10/29/2007)

9293

Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Staffing Analysis)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 11/01/2007)

9294 MOTION Submitting External Auditors' Report for Fiscal Year 2006−2007 filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit External Auditors' Report)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 11/06/2007)

9295 Invoice number 11/07 in the amount of $61,699 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of October 2007. (ni) (Entered: 11/14/2007)

9296 Invoice number 15569 in the amount of $376,150.32 payable to MGT of America, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal Letter) (cm) (Entered: 11/21/2007)

9297 ORDER for payment to RSM ROC & Company re: 9251 Invoice number 26506 in the amount of $2,300.00. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/27/07. (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2007)

9298 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $61,699 to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. re: 9295 Invoice number 11/07. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/27/07. (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2007)

9299 Invoice number 26292 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of July 2007. (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2007)

9300 ORDER for payment to RSM ROC & Company re: 9299 Invoice number 26292 in the amount of $2,300 for the month of July 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/27/07. (ni) (Entered: 11/29/2007)

9301

MOTION Submitting Translation of evidentiary documents filed byLuis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of all plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Translation − Table of Comparison from Bayamon 501# 2 Exhibit Translation − Table of Comparison from Bayamon 1072# 3 Exhibit Translation − Table of Comparison from Bayamon 308)(Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 12/04/2007)

9302 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of all defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 12/05/2007)

9303 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9306 Letter from the Correctional Medical Center. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/10/2007. (cm) Modified on 12/12/2007 to create link to dkt. #9306 (cm,). (Entered: 12/11/2007)

9304 Invoice number 26295 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered the month of June 2007. (cm) (Entered: 12/11/2007)

9305 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9304 Invoice. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/10/2007. (cm) (Entered: 12/11/2007)

9306 Letter from Correctional Health Services, Corp. requesting transfer of funds. (cm) (Entered: 12/12/2007)

9307 Invoice number 12/07 in the amount of $67,088.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of November 2007. (ni) (Entered: 12/13/2007)

9308 Invoice number 15636 in the amount of $382,011.47 payable to MGT of America for the month of October 2007. (ni) (Entered: 12/13/2007)

9309

ORDER granting 9231 Motion for Contempt of the 1987 Order and the 1994 Stipulation. Miguel A. Pereira−Castillo must pay $10.00 per day for each padlock used to close cell doors at Bayamon 501 and dormitory doors at Bayamon 1072 as stated herein. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/13/07. (ni) (Entered: 12/13/2007)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 415 of 513

12/14/2007 12/14/2007 12/17/2007 12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/18/2007
12/19/2007 12/19/2007 12/19/2007 12/21/2007 12/24/2007
12/24/2007
01/02/2008
01/08/2008 01/10/2008

9310 Invoice number 26914 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of August 2007. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 12/14/2007)

9311 Invoice number 26913 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of September 2007. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 12/14/2007)

9312 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding vacations filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/17/2007)

9313 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9307 Invoice number 12/07 in the amount of $67,088.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of November 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/17/07. (ni) (Entered: 12/18/2007)

9314 ***VACATED AS PER 9317 *** ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9308 Invoice number 15636 in the amount of $382,011.47 payable to MGT of America for the month of October 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/17/07. (ni) Modified on 12/19/2007 (ni). (Entered: 12/18/2007)

9315 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9310 Invoice number 26914 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of August 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/17/07. (ni) (Entered: 12/18/2007)

9316 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9311 Invoice number 26913 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of September 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/17/07. (ni) (Entered: 12/18/2007)

9317 ORDER VACATING 9314 Order of Distribution of Funds . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/19/07. (mt) (Entered: 12/19/2007)

9318 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re 9262 Invoice number 15495 in the amount of $382,283.94 payable to MGT of America for the month of August 2007 . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/19/07. (mt) (Entered: 12/19/2007)

9319 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Absence of Joint Lead Counsel filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of all plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/19/2007)

9320 ORDER noted 9259 Motion for Sanctions; noted 9319 INFORMATIVE motion . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/21/07. (mt) (Entered: 12/21/2007)

9321 Joint MOTION APPROVAL OF CONTRACT EXTENSION AND FUNDS THEREOF filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 1/11/2008 to edit word (ov). (Entered: 12/24/2007)

9322 MOTION Stating Plaintiff Class' Position re 9321 Joint MOTION APPROVAL OF CONTRACT EXTENSION AND FUNDS THEREOF filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of all plaintiffs (Related document(s) 9321 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) Modified on 6/5/2008 to edit text volume (cm). (Entered: 12/24/2007)

9323 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9309 Order on Motion for Contempt, filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of all defendantsSuggestions in opposition/response due by 1/18/2008 (Related document(s) 9309 ) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 01/02/2008)

9324 Invoice number 1/08 in the amount of $73,188.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (ab) . (Entered: 01/10/2008)

9325

ORDER: This Motion is Approved, including the payment process. re 9321 Joint MOTION PPROVAL OF CONTRACT EXTENSION AND FUNDS THEREOF filed by Roberto Velez, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Hector Manuel Sanchez−Castro, Jaime Pedrosa−Colon, Victor Velazquez−Caussade, Julio Medina−Medina, Felix Torres−Garcia, Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, Joe Colon, Jorge Rondon−Melendez, Gerardo Cruz−Soto, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata,

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 416 of 513

01/10/2008 01/10/2008 01/15/2008
01/15/2008
01/22/2008 01/25/2008 01/28/2008 01/28/2008 01/30/2008 01/30/2008

Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Angelo Ravelo−Garcia, Luis Romero−Rivera, Maximiliano Amparo−Concepcion, Johnny Colon, Otto Riefkohl, USA, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad, Miguel A. Nieves−Ruiz, All Plaintiffs, Jose Manuel Delgado−Torres, Benito Rosario, Aixa Mariano, Maria Riscard, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Joseph F. Colon, Canteen Correctional Services, Otto Riefkohl−Gorbea, Jose L. Jimenez−Quinones, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Carlos Cruz−Serrano, Israel Alers, EBP, Luis A. Custodian Officer Feliciano, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Sigfredo Zambrana−De−Jesus, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Gladys Rivera−Correa, Prairie Correctional Facility Corporation (PCF), Alexis Diaz−Torres, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Walter Diaz−Rojas, Luis Munoz−Munoz, Carlos Pizarro−Sostre, MGT of America, Union General de Trabajadores (UGT), Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Isabel Suliveres, Geraldo Cruz−Soto, Sila M. Calderon, Samuel Sanchez−Santana, Edwin Marcucci−Caraballo, Lorenzo Villalba, Rodolfo Cecilio−Figueroa, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Eli Samuel Concepcion−Maestre, Correctional Health Department, Orquidea Villanueva, KSP Surety & Bonding Corporation, Raymond Rivera−Rios, Jorge Delgado−Golash, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Ramon Mellado, Angel Miranda, Defendant−All, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Tomas Melendez−Sanchez, Juanita Gomez, Luis E. Tirado−Barreras, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Civil Action and Education Corporation, Roberto Gonzalez−Cruz, Johnny Rullan, Corrections Administration, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Ricardo Laureano−Bermudez, Ricardo Mercado, U.S. Probation, Evaristo Cruz, Efrain Ortiz−Vega, Irba Cruz de Batista, Nydia Cotto−Vives, Justo Torres−Garcia, Salvador Borta−Lebron, Edwin Vazquez−Rodriguez, Mirla M. Rodriguez−Marin, Celia Alamo, Hector A. Gabriel, Luis F. Pacheco−Carmona, Zoe Laboy, Jose G. Pena−Sanchez, Israel Correa−Rivera, Correctional Health Services Corporation, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Joseph Maya−Gambino, Nestor Galarza, Hector Ocasio−Ortiz, Carmen Feliciano, Juan A. Garcia, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/10/08. (mt) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
9326 ORDER noted re 9322 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/10/08. (mt) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
9327 ORDER denying re 9323 Motion for Reconsideration . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/10/08. (mt) (Entered: 01/10/2008)
9328 First MOTION for Extension of Time until January 16, 2008 to file report and deposit check filed byEileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of Miguel Pereira Castillo Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/31/2008 (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 01/15/2008)
9329 Motion In Compliance with Order, MOTION to Deposit Funds in concept of fines filed byEduardo A. Vera−Ramirez on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A − Report, # 2 Exhibit Check)(Vera−Ramirez, Eduardo) (Entered: 01/15/2008)
9332 NOTICE OF APPEAL by Miguel Pereira Castillo. Re: 9309 Order, (Filing fee $ 455.) (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) Modified on 1/23/2008 to add docket entry relationship (cm,). (Entered: 01/22/2008)
9333 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed byCarlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 01/25/2008)
9334 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9333 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/25/2008. (cm) (Entered: 01/28/2008)
9335 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9324 Curnyn Consulting Ltd.'s Invoice for the month of December 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/25/2007. (cm) (Entered: 01/28/2008)
9337 LETTER/ MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed byCorrectional Health Services Corporation (cm) (Entered: 01/30/2008)
9338 ORDER granting 9337 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/29/2008. (cm) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 417 of 513

01/30/2008 01/30/2008 02/01/2008 02/07/2008
02/12/2008 02/13/2008 02/13/2008 02/19/2008 02/22/2008 02/25/2008 02/25/2008 02/25/2008 02/25/2008 02/25/2008

9339 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9296 MGT of America's Invoice #15569 in the amount of $376,150.32 for services covering the month of September 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/29/2008. (cm) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

9340 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9308 MGT of America's Invoice #15636 in the amount of $382,011.47 for services covering the month of October 2007. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/29/2008. (cm) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

9341 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Invoice for June, # 2 Exhibit Invoices for July and August, # 3 Exhibit Invoice for September, # 4 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 02/01/2008)

9342

MOTION to Clarify, MOTION to Strike Re: 9341 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Defendant−All, 9302 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio ( Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/23/2008) filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Related document(s) 9341 , 9302 ) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 02/07/2008)

9343 Invoice number 2/08 in the amount of $74,800.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered in the month of January 2008. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Consulting Fees) (cm) (Entered: 02/13/2008)

9344 Invoice number 15757 in the amount of $386,945.14 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for consulting services November 2007. (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal Letter) (cm) (Entered: 02/13/2008)

9345 Invoice number 15803 in the amount of $376,379.53 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for consulting services December 2007. (Attachments: # 1 Transmittal Letter) (cm) (Entered: 02/13/2008)

USCA Appeal Fees received $ 455.00 receipt number 174832 re 9332 Notice of Appeal filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo (ne) (Entered: 02/19/2008)

9346 Certified and Transmitted Record on Appeal to US Court of Appeals re 9332 Notice of Appeal (Copies of dkts. 979,...,9332; Pltffs'. Exhs. 6,...,19 & Defts'. Exh. C; Master & CM/ECF docket sheets sent on CD Rom)(xi) (Entered: 02/22/2008)

9347 TRANSCRIPT of Hearing on Motion held on 10/15/07 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Filed at 2/25/08 at 9:00 a.m. by Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle. (cr) (Entered: 02/25/2008)

9348 TRANSCRIPT of Hearing on Motion held on 10/16/07 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Filed by Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle on 2/25/08 at 9:00 a.m. (cr) (Entered: 02/25/2008)

9349 TRANSCRIPT of Hearing on Motion held on 10/17/07 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Filed by Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle on 2/25/08 at 9:00 a.m. (cr) (Entered: 02/25/2008)

9350 Invoice number 27185 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services for the month of November 2007. (cm) (Entered: 02/25/2008)

9351 Invoice number 27186 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services for the month of October 2007. (cm) (Entered: 02/25/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 418 of 513

02/25/2008 02/26/2008 02/26/2008 02/29/2008 03/04/2008 03/04/2008 03/04/2008 03/04/2008
03/04/2008 03/04/2008 03/04/2008
03/04/2008 03/04/2008 03/11/2008 03/12/2008
03/13/2008
03/17/2008
04/02/2008

9354 Invoice number 27333 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services for the month of December 2007. (cm) . (Entered: 02/28/2008)

9352 USCA Case Number 08−1249 for 9332 Notice of Appeal filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo. (xi) (Entered: 02/26/2008)

9353 Supplemental Record on Appeal transmitted to US Court of Appeals Re 9332 Notice of Appeal filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo [Docket Entries 9347 − 9349 (Transcripts)](xi) (Entered: 02/26/2008)

9355 Invoice number 15976 in the amount of $336,941.95 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for professional consulting services, January 2008. (cm) (Entered: 02/29/2008)

9356 ORDER noted 9302 Motion submitting (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/08.) (mt) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

9357 ORDER noted 9341 Motion submitting (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/08.) (mt) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

9358 ORDER noted 9342 Motion to clarify; noted 9342 Motion to Strike (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/08.) (mt) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

9359 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: Invoice No. 27185 payable to RSM ROC & Company for the month of November 2007, in the amount of $2,300.00.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/2008.)(cm) Modified on 3/4/2008 to read: November 2007. (Entered: 03/04/2008)

9360 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: Invoice No. 27186 payable to RSM ROC & Company in the amount of $2,300.00 for the month of October 2007.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/2008).(cm) (Entered: 03/05/2008)

9361 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: Invoice No. 27333 payable to RSM ROC & Company in the amount of $2,3000.00 for the month of December 2007.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/2008).(cm) (Entered: 03/05/2008)

9362 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $18,187.50 payable to Nancy I. Boneta−Lopez for professional services as consultant, for the months of May, June, July, September and October 2007.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 03/05/2008)

9363 LETTER/ MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed byCorrectional Health Services Corporation (cm) . (Entered: 03/05/2008)

9364 ORDER granting 9363 Motion for Disbursement of Funds ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/2008). (cm) (Entered: 03/05/2008)

9367 Invoice number 3/08 in the amount of $74,044.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. (cm) (Entered: 03/12/2008)

9366 The Court approves 9344 Invoice No. 15757, and requests the Clerk of the Court to pay said invoice, payable to MGT OF America in the amount of $386,945.14.(Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/10/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 03/12/2008)

9368

Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/13/2008)

9369 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Invoices for November 2007 to February 2008, # 2 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/17/2008)

9370 Invoice number 16033 in the amount of $355,124.37 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for consulting services February 2008. (cm) (Entered: 04/02/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 419 of 513

04/04/2008
04/07/2008 04/08/2008 04/15/2008
04/16/2008 04/16/2008 04/16/2008 04/16/2008 04/16/2008 05/05/2008 05/09/2008
05/13/2008 05/14/2008 05/15/2008 05/16/2008 05/16/2008 05/16/2008 05/16/2008 05/19/2008

9371 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Invoice for March 2008, # 2 Exhibit Certificate of Services, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 04/04/2008)
9372 USCA JUDGMENT as to 9332 Notice of Appeal filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo; The appeal is DISMISSED as untimely. (xi) (Entered: 04/07/2008)
9373 Invoice number 4/08 in the amount of $73,317.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for services rendered during the month of March 2008. (cm) (Entered: 04/09/2008)
9375 Motion In Compliance with December 13, 2007 order and tendering payment in concept of fines filed byArlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Report, # 2 Exhibit Check)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 04/15/2008)
9376 ORDER granting 9345 Invoice ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/15/08.)(np) (Entered: 04/16/2008)
9377 ORDER granting 9367 Invoice ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/15/08.)(np) (Entered: 04/16/2008)
9378 ORDER granting 9343 Invoice ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/15/08.)(np) (Entered: 04/16/2008)
9379 ORDER granting 9374 Invoice ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/15/08.)(np) (Entered: 04/16/2008)
9380 ORDER granting 9369 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Defendant−All ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/15/008.)(np) (Entered: 04/16/2008)
9381 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 05/05/2008)
9382 Motion In Compliance with 9309 December 13, 2007 order, filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 5/13/2008 (to add docket entry relationship(cm,). (Entered: 05/09/2008)
9383 Invoice number 27664 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & COMPANY (cm) (Entered: 05/13/2008)
9384 Invoice number 5/08 in the amount of $72,404.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting for the month of April 08. (np) (Entered: 05/15/2008)
9385 Invoice number #16095 in the amount of $345,352.64 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for the month of 03/08. (np) (Entered: 05/15/2008)
9386 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds RE: 9371 MOTION Submitting (Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/14/08)(ov) (Entered: 05/16/2008)
9387 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9373 Invoice Number 4/08 (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/14/08.)(ov) Modified on 5/16/2008 to correct invoice number(ov). (Entered: 05/16/2008)
9388 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9383 Invoice number 27664 (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/14/08.)(ov) (Entered: 05/16/2008)
NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 9387 Order of Distribution of Funds. ***ENTRY MODIFIED TO CORRECT INVOICE NUMBER *** (ov) (Entered: 05/16/2008)
9390 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR NANCY BONETA filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Report, # 2 Exhibit Invoice for April 2008, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/19/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 420 of 513

05/20/2008 05/20/2008 05/20/2008 05/20/2008 05/20/2008 05/20/2008 05/23/2008 05/30/2008 06/02/2008
06/02/2008 06/02/2008 06/02/2008
06/02/2008

9391 MANDATE of USCA as to 9332 Notice of Appeal filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo; The appeal is DISMISSED as untimely. (xi) (Entered: 05/20/2008)

9392 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9370 MGT of America's Invoice #16033, Professional Fees for Consulting Services covering the month of February 2008 (Payment #62), in the amount of $355,124.37. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/20/2008).(cm) (Entered: 05/20/2008)

9393 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9355 MGT of America's Invoice #15976 for professional fees for consulting services covering the month of January 2008 (payment #61), in the amount of $336,941.95.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/20/2008).(cm) (Entered: 05/20/2008)

9394 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9385 MGT of America's Invoice #16095 for professional fees for consulting services covering the month of March 2008 (Payment $63) in the amount of $345,352.64. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/20/2008).(cm) (Entered: 05/20/2008)

9395 ORDER granting 9381 Motion for Disbursement of Funds ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/19/2008). (cm) (Entered: 05/20/2008)

9396 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9384 Invoice #5/08 in the amount of $72,404.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD., for professional services during the month of April 2008.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/20/2008).(cm) (Entered: 05/20/2008)

Appeal Record Returned: 9332 Notice of Appeal (Copies; copies of Plttf's Exhs. 6,...,19, Deft's Exh. C; CD/Rom & Transcripts #9347−9349)(xi) (Entered: 05/23/2008)

9397 Invoice number 28007 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for services rendered during the month of February 2008. (cm) . (Entered: 05/30/2008)

9398

ORDER re 9209 Motion for Contempt and for the Levying of Fines Due to Defendants' Failure to Monitor and/or Comply with the Maximum Operational Capacity filed by All Plaintiffs and opposition filed at Dkt #9227: Counsel shall submit a Joint Informative Motion advising the Court of the status of the two pending motions. (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/2/2008.)(ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9399 ORDER noted 9195 Motion requesting Order; noted 9196 Motion In Compliance; granting 9199 Motion to Withdraw Document (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9400 ORDER denying 9204 Motion In Compliance; noted 9205 Motion In Compliance; granting 9207 Motion to Strike (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9401

ORDER finding as moot 9222 Motion for extension of time; finding as moot 9223 Motion for extension of time; finding as moot 9224 Motion for Extension of Time to File; finding as moot 9225 INFORMATIVE motion; finding as moot 9225 Motion for extension of time (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9403

ORDER: NOTED re 9229 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding TRANSLATION OF INMATE CLASSIFICATION MANUAL filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 421 of 513

06/02/2008 06/02/2008
06/02/2008 06/02/2008
06/02/2008 06/02/2008 06/02/2008 06/02/2008 06/02/2008 06/02/2008 06/02/2008

9404

ORDER: Noted re 9230 MOTION for Leave to File Document Reply filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Motions terminated: 9230 MOTION for Leave to File Document Reply filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano. (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) . (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9405

ORDER: NOTED re 9242 Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) . (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9406 ORDER finding as moot 9245 Motion for extension of time; noted 9289 Motion submitting (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9407

ORDER : NOTED re 9293 Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Motions terminated: 9293 .( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) Modified on 6/2/2008 to edit repetitive text (cm). (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9408 ORDER noted 9301 Motion submitting (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9409 ORDER: Noted re 9329 Motion In Compliance with Order MOTION to Deposit Funds in concept of fines filed by Defendant−All (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) . (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9410 ORDER : Noted re 9332 Notice of Appeal filed by Miguel Pereira Castillo. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) . (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9411 ORDER: Noted re 9375 Motion In Compliance with December 13, 2007 order and tendering payment in concept of fines filed by Defendant−All (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) . (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9412

ORDER : Noted re 9368 Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER REGARDING POPULATION CAPACITIES AND MOTION IN COMPLIANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 44 OF THE STIPULATION REGARDING CUSTODIAL AND SOCIOPENAL STAFFING filed by Defendant−All (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) . (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9413 ORDER: Noted re 9382 Motion In Compliance with December 13, 2007 order filed by Defendant−All (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9414 ORDER : Moot re 9231 Motion for Contempt of the Court for the Use of Padlocks in the Housing Units, Cells, and Emergency Exits in Violation of the Court's Orders filed by Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano (. Signed

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 422 of 513

06/02/2008 06/02/2008 06/02/2008
06/02/2008 06/03/2008 06/05/2008 06/05/2008 06/09/2008 06/09/2008 06/11/2008 06/12/2008 06/12/2008 06/23/2008

by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.)(ja) . (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9415 ORDER noted 9294 Motion submitting (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9416 ORDER finding as moot 9328 Motion for Extension of Time to File (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9417

ORDER : Noted re 9312 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding vacations filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/2/2008.)(ja) (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9421 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: Invoice No. 28007 in the amount of $2,300 payable to RSM ROC & Company for services provided in April 2008 for the month of February 2008.(. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/30/2008.) (cm). (Entered: 06/02/2008)

9425 Invoice number 6/08 in the amount of $72,524.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered during the month of May 2008. (cm) (Entered: 06/05/2008)

9426 Invoice number 16259 in the amount of $354,954.65 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for professional consulting services rendered during the month of April 2008. (cm) (Entered: 06/05/2008)

9427 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9425 Invoice number 6/08 in the amount of $72,524.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered during the month of May 2008.(Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/4/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 06/05/2008)

9428 ORDER granting 9390 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR NANCY BONETA in the amt of $6,600 for the month of April filed by Defendant−All ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/9/08)(np) (Entered: 06/11/2008)

9429 **STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD SEE (9558) ORDER**
INFORMATIVE Motion regarding civil rights violation filed by plaintiff Juan Velez−Menendez, pro−se. (np) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/11/2008: # 1 Envelope) (np). Modified on 2/17/2009 (cm). (Entered: 06/11/2008)

9430 ORDER finding as moot 9209 Motion for Contempt (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/11/2008.) (ja) (Entered: 06/11/2008)

9431 LETTER MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(cm) (Entered: 06/12/2008)

9432 ORDER granting 9431 Motion for Disbursement of Funds (. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/12/2008.) (cm) (Entered: 06/12/2008)

9433

Joint MOTION Submitting Inmate Classification Manual filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs, Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Inmate Classification Manual, # 2 Appendix Appendix A, # 3 Appendix Appendix B, # 4 Appendix Appendix C, # 5 Appendix Appendix D1, # 6 Appendix Appendix D1 Instructions, # 7 Appendix Appendix D1 Exhibit 1, # 8 Appendix Appendix D1 Exhibit 2, # 9 Appendix Appendix D1 Exhibit 3, # 10 Appendix Appendix D2, # 11 Appendix Appendix D2 Scale, # 12 Appendix Appendix E1, # 13 Appendix Appendix E2, # 14 Appendix Appendix F, # 15 Appendix Appendix G1, # 16 Appendix Appendix G1 Scale, # 17 Appendix Appendix G2 Instructions, # 18 Appendix Appendix G2 Scale)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 06/23/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 423 of 513

07/08/2008 07/08/2008 07/10/2008 07/11/2008 07/15/2008
07/15/2008 07/16/2008 07/16/2008 07/16/2008 07/16/2008
07/18/2008
07/18/2008 07/30/2008
08/01/2008 08/06/2008

9434 Invoice number 28219 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of April 2008. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 07/09/2008)

9435 Invoice number 28218 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of March 2008. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) . (Entered: 07/09/2008)

9438 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (cm) (Entered: 07/11/2008)

9436 Invoice number 7/08 in the amount of $70,011.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc., for professional services rendered re: Stipulation, during the month of June 2008. (cm) (Entered: 07/11/2008)

9439

**FILED IN ERROR** Motion In Compliance WITH DECEMBER 13, 2007
ORDER AND TENDERING PAYMENT IN CONCEPT OF FINES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Check)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 7/16/2008 (cm). (Entered: 07/15/2008)

9440 Invoice number 16387 in the amount of $345,095.66 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for professional consulting services, May 2008. (cm) (Entered: 07/16/2008)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 9439 Motion In Compliance WITH DECEMBER 13, 2007 ORDER AND TENDERING PAYMENT IN CONCEPT OF FINES. **MOTION TERMINATED DUE TO CHECK ERROR, COUNSEL ADVISED BY TELEPHONE** (cm) (Entered: 07/16/2008)

9442 ORDER noted 9433 Motion submitting (Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/14/2008.) (cm) (Entered: 07/16/2008)

9443 ORDER granting 9438 Motion for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corp.(Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/16/2008.) (cm) (Entered: 07/16/2008)

9444

INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Check for Payment of FinesJuly 22, 2008, MOTION for extension of time until Check for Payment of FinesJuly 22, 2008 to DEPOSIT THE FUNDS ORDERED BY THIS HONORABLE COURT( Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/1/2008) filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/16/2008)

9445 **STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD SEE (9466) ORDER**
RESPONSE to Motion to Plaintiffs' Statements on Request for Disbursement of Funds filed by MGT of America Re: 9438 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by MGT of America. (Graffam, William) Modified on 9/10/2008 (cm). (Entered: 07/18/2008)

9446 Motion In Compliance with Order, MOTION to Deposit Funds filed by Eduardo A. Vera−Ramirez on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Check, # 2 Exhibit Report)(Vera−Ramirez, Eduardo) (Entered: 07/18/2008)

9447

MOTION to Strike "Response to Plaintiffs' Statements on Request for Disbursement of Funds" Re: 9445 Response to Motion, filed by MGT of America filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/15/2008 (Related document(s) 9445 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/30/2008)

9448 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion to Strike filed by all defendants Re: 9445 Response to Motion, filed by MGT of America, 9447 MOTION to Strike "Response to Plaintiffs' Statements on Request for Disbursement of Funds"filed by all defendants. (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 08/01/2008)

9449 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Invoice May 2008, # 2 Exhibit Report May 2008, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/06/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 424 of 513

08/06/2008 08/06/2008 08/06/2008 08/07/2008 08/13/2008 08/13/2008 08/20/2008
08/26/2008 09/04/2008
09/09/2008 09/10/2008 09/10/2008 09/10/2008 09/10/2008 09/10/2008 09/10/2008

9450 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Invoice June 2008, # 2 Exhibit Report June 2008, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/06/2008)

9451 MOTION requesting leave to participate in Status Conference and/or hearing filed by Comite de Amigos y Familiares de Confinados, Inc.,PRO SE. (dv) (Entered: 08/07/2008)

9452 MOTION requesting leave to participate in Status Conference or Hearing filed by Association for the Rights and Rehabilitation of Inmates Population, PRO SE. (dv) (Entered: 08/07/2008)

9453 Invoice number 16546 in the amount of $245,199.18 payable to MGT of America for the month of June 2008. (ni) (Entered: 08/08/2008)

9454 ORDER denying 9451 Motion requesting Order ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/12/2008). (cm) (Entered: 08/13/2008)

9455 Invoice number 8/08 in the amount of $59,585.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to stipulation during the month of July 2088. (cm) (Entered: 08/14/2008)

9456

MOTION Submitting Plaintiff Class' Comments on the Jointly Filed Inmate Classification Manual re: 9433 Joint MOTION Submitting Inmate Classification Manual filed by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Related document(s) 9433 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 08/20/2008)

9457 Invoice number #16618 in the amount of $228,111.05 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for consulting services, July 2008 (cm) (Entered: 08/26/2008)

9458

MOTION for Extension of Time until September 12, 2008 to File Response/Reply re: 9456 Motion Submitting; filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/22/2008 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 9/8/2008 to add docket entry relationship (cm,). (Entered: 09/04/2008)

9459 Invoice number 9/08 in the amount of $69,132.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of August 2008. (cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9460 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9426 Invoice No. 16259 payable in the amount of $354,954.65 to MGT of America for consulting services during the month of April 2008. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/208.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9461 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9435 Invoice No. 28218 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company in relation to the accounting for the month of March 2008.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9462 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9434 Invoice No. 28219 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company in relation to the accounting for the month of April 2008. (Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9463 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9440 Invoice No. 16387 in the amount of $345,095.66, payable to MGT of America for consulting services covering the month of May 2008. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9464 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9453 Invoice No. 16546 in the amount of $245,199.18 payable to MGT of America for consulting services covering the month of June 2008. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9465 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9455 Invoice No. 8/08 in the amount of $59,585.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd., for professional services rendered

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 425 of 513

09/10/2008 09/10/2008 09/10/2008 09/10/2008
09/10/2008 09/10/2008 09/11/2008 09/15/2008 09/15/2008
09/25/2008
09/25/2008 09/30/2008

during the month of July 2008. (Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9466 ORDER re 9445 Response to Motion, filed by MGT of America. Docket (9445) is stricken from the record of this case.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9467 ORDER noted 9446 Motion In Compliance; noted 9446 Motion to Deposit Funds.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.) (cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9468 ORDER granting 9447 Motion to Strike ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.) (cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9469

ORDER noted re 9448 Response in Opposition to Motion, filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Rafael Hernandez−Colon, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9470 ORDER denying 9452 Motion requesting Order ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008.) (cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9471 ORDER granting as requested 9458 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 9456 MOTION Submitting Plaintiff Class' Comments on the
Jointly Filed Inmate Classification Manual, Reply deadline due 9/12/2008 (
Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2008)(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2008)

9472 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Invoice July 2008, # 2 Exhibit Report July 2008, # 3 Text of Proposed Order)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 09/11/2008)

9473 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9436 Invoice No. 7/08 in the amount of $70,011.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services relative to the stipulation during the month of June 2008. (Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/15/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/15/2008)

9474

MOTION for Leave to File Instanter DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINITFFS 9456 MOTION SUBMITTING PLAINTIFF CLASS COMMENTS ON THE JOINTLY FILED INMATE CLASSIFICATION MANUAL, filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Errata DEFENDANTS RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINITFFS MOTION SUBMITTING PLAINTIFF CLASS COMMENTS ON THE JOINTLY FILED INMATE CLASSIFICATION MANUAL)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 9/18/2008 to correct event type(cm). (Entered: 09/15/2008)

9476

Second MOTION for Hearing re 9474 MOTION for Leave to File Document filed by Defendant−All, 9456 MOTION Submitting Plaintiff Class' Comments on the Jointly Filed Inmate Classification Manual re: 9433 Joint MOTION Submitting Inmate Classification Manual filed by Defendant−All, filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Related document(s) 9474 , 9456 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) Modified on 10/2/2008 to edit repetitive text(cm). (Entered: 09/25/2008)

9477 MOTION requesting leave to participate in Status Conference and/or hearing filed by Association for the Rights and Rehabilitation of Inmates Population, pro se (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 09/26/2008)

9478 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9459 Invoice No. 9/08 in the amount of $69,132.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services incurred relative to the stipulation during the month of August 2008. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/29/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 426 of 513

09/30/2008
09/30/2008
09/30/2008 09/30/2008 09/30/2008 10/09/2008 10/09/2008 10/15/2008 10/16/2008
10/20/2008 10/20/2008 10/29/2008
10/30/2008 10/30/2008

9479

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, re: 9449 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by all defendants, payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez for the month of May 2008. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/29/2008)(cm) Modified on 9/30/2008 to correct text (cm). (Entered: 09/30/2008)

9480

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, re: 9450 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by all defendants, payable to Nancy I. Boneta Lopez for the month of June 2008.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/29/2008.)(cm) Modified on 9/30/2008 to correct text(cm). (Entered: 09/30/2008)

9481 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, re: 9472 MOTION Submitting INVOICES FOR CONSULTING SERVICES filed by all defendant payable to Nancy I. Boneta−Lopez for the month of July 2008. ( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/27/2008.)(cm) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

9482 LETTER MOTION Submitting for Approval the Operational Budget for fiscal year 2008−2009, Disbursement of Funds filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (cm) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

9483 ORDER APPROVING 9482 The Operational Budget and Transfer of Funds for the First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2008−2009 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation.( Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/26/2008.) (cm) (Entered: 09/30/2008)

9484 ORDER granting 9476 Motion for Hearing Motion Hearing set for 10/29/2008 at 09:30 AM before Judge Juan M
Perez−Gimenez. (Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/9/2008.)
(ja) (Entered: 10/09/2008)

9485 ORDER denying 9477 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 10/09/2008.) (mt) (Entered: 10/09/2008)

9486 Invoice number 16713 in the amount of $222,454.19 payable to MGT of America for consulting services covering the month of August 2008. (cm) (Entered: 10/15/2008)

9487

INFORMATIVE Motion regarding COMPLIANCE WITH DECEMBER 13, 2007 ORDERNovember 7, 2008, MOTION for extension of time until COMPLIANCE WITH DECEMBER 13, 2007 ORDERNovember 7, 2008 to Deposit Fines( Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/3/2008) filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certification)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 10/16/2008)

9489 MOTION to Withdraw Legal Representation Attorney as to Eileen Landron−Guardiola filed by Eileen Landron−Guardiola on behalf of Defendant−All (Landron−Guardiola, Eileen) (Entered: 10/20/2008)

9490 NOTICE of Appearance by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of all defendants (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 10/20/2008)

9491

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez: Motion Hearing held on 10/29/2008 re 9476 Second MOTION for Hearing re 9474 , 9456 re: 9433 . Present for the plaintiffs, Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Guillermo Ramos Luina, and Luis Henriquez. For the defendants, Esther Crispin, and Arlene De La Mata. Also present in court, Juan C. Deliz Morales. Parties presented their respective positions as to the pending matters in this case. Simultaneous legal memorandums shall be filed by the parties within ten (10) days. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (om) (Entered: 10/29/2008)

9492 MOTION to Deposit Funds (Fine) filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 10/30/2008)

DEPOSIT of Funds in the amount of $ 24,000.00; Receipt #179367. (cm) (Entered: 10/31/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 427 of 513

10/30/2008 10/30/2008 10/31/2008 10/31/2008 11/11/2008
11/12/2008 11/12/2008 11/13/2008
11/18/2008
11/18/2008
11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/18/2008 11/26/2008
11/26/2008

9494 MOTION requesting participation in status conference filed by Association for the Rights and Rehabilitation of Inmates Population (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 10/31/2008)
9495 MOTION requesting participation in status conference filed by Association for the Rights and Rehabilitation of Inmates Population (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 10/31/2008)
9493 ORDER granting 9487 INFORMATIVE motion; granting 9487 Motion for extension of time of 15 days to comply. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/30/2008. (cm) (Entered: 10/31/2008)
9496 Invoice number 16847 in the amount of $210,766.83 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for professional services rendered during the month of September 2008. (cm) (Entered: 10/31/2008)
9498 MOTION for extension of time until Novembre 28, 2008 to File Legal Memorandum filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/1/2008 (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 11/11/2008)
9499 Invoice number 10/08 in the amount of $65,249.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd, for professional services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of September 2008. (cm) . (Entered: 11/13/2008)
9500 Invoice number 11/08 in the amount of $70,367.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of October 2008. (cm) (Entered: 11/13/2008)
9501 Motion In Compliance with Order Regarding Population Capacities and with Order Approving Stipulation Regarding Security, Staffing, FRP, Classification and Other Matters (Paragraph 44) filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 11/13/2008)
9502 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9499 Invoice number 10/08 in the amount of $65,249.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd, for professional services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of September 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/2008.(cm) (Entered: 11/18/2008)
9503 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9500 Invoice number 11/08 in the amount of $70,367.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of October 2008.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/2008.(cm) (Entered: 11/18/2008)
9504 ORDER granting 9489 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Eileen Landron−Guardiola and Arlene R. Perez−Borrero terminated Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/2008. (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2008)
9505 ORDER noted 9492 Motion to Deposit Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/2008. (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2008)
9506 ORDER denying 9494 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/2008. (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2008)
9507 ORDER denying 9495 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/2008. (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2008)
9508 ORDER granting 9498 Motion for extension of time Memorandum Filing due by 11/28/2008. Signed by Judge Juan M
Perez−Gimenez on 11/15/2008. (cm) (Entered: 11/18/2008)
9509 Motion In Compliance WITH ORDER (DKT. 9508) RE: PLAINTIFF CLASS' BRIEF ON THE SECRETARY'S LACK OF LEGAL AUTHORITY AND THE RIGHT TO RECONSIDERATION UNDER THE UAPA filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
9510 Motion In Compliance with Court Orders filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 11/26/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 428 of 513

11/26/2008 11/28/2008 12/01/2008 12/02/2008 12/02/2008 12/02/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/03/2008

9511 Motion In Compliance with Court Orders filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 11/26/2008)
9512 Motion In Compliance with Court Order filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 11/28/2008)
9513 Invoice number 16936 in the amount of $208,945.44 payable to MGT of America, Inc., for professional consulting services during October 2008. (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2008)
9514 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/02/2008)
9515 Invoice number 28745 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of May 2008. (cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9516 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9515 Invoice No.28745 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of May 2008.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/1/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9517 Invoice number 28746 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of June 2008. (cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9518 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9517 Invoice No. 28746 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for serviced rendered for the month of June 2008.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9519 Invoice number 28800 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of July 2008. (cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9520 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9519 Invoice No. 28800 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of July 2008.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9521 Invoice number 29002 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of August 2008. (cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9522 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9521 Invoice No. 29002 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered for the month of August 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9523 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9457 Invoice in the amount of $228,111.05 payable to MGT of America for professional consulting services covering the month of July 2008.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9524 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9486 Invoice No. 16713 in the amount of $222,454.19 payable to MGT of America for professional consulting services for the month of August 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9525 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9496 Invoice No. 16847 in the amount of $210,766.83 payable to MGT of America for professional consulting services during the month of September 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)
9526 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9513 Invoice No. 16936 in the amount of $208,945.44 payable to MGT of America for professional consulting services during the month of October 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2008.(cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 429 of 513

12/03/2008 12/03/2008 12/15/2008 12/19/2008 12/31/2008
01/07/2009 01/12/2009
01/12/2009 01/13/2009
01/15/2009
01/15/2009 01/16/2009
01/16/2009 01/27/2009 02/10/2009 02/10/2009 02/10/2009

9527 Invoice number 12/08 in the amount of $63,503.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered during the month of November 2008. (cm) (Entered: 12/03/2008)

9528 ORDER Granted and so Ordered re 9514 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez on 12/03/2008. (mt) (Entered: 12/03/2008)

9529 Motion In Compliance with Court Order filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 12/15/2008)

9530 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding ABSENCE OF JOINT LEAD COUNSEL filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/19/2008)

9531

INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit MGT Fifth Year Status Report, # 2 Exhibit MGT Fifth Year Status Report Executive Summary, # 3 Exhibit MGT Operational Review Program Status Report and Results November 2008)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 12/31/2008)

9532 Invoice number 16998 in the amount of $202,995.52 payable to MGT of America, Inc. for professional consulting services during November, 2008. (ov) . (Entered: 01/09/2009)

9533 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9527 Invoice in the amount of $63,503.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services during the month of November 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/8/2009.(cm) (Entered: 01/12/2009)

9535 ORDER noted 9530 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/12/2009. (mt) (Entered: 01/12/2009)

9536 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9532 Invoice #16998 in the amount of $202,995.52 payable to MGT of America for professional fees for consulting services covering the month of November 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/12/2009.(cm) (Entered: 01/13/2009)

DEPOSIT of Funds in the amount of $16.21, receipt number 180624 & $21.23, receipt number 180625. Deposited ((NEXT WORKING DAY)) in an Interest Bearing Account in compliance with L.R.67. **FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR DISBURSEMENT WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS**. (jla) (Entered: 01/15/2009)

9537 ORDER noted 9529 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 01/15/2009. (mt) (Entered: 01/15/2009)

DEPOSIT of Funds from Tribunal General de Justicia in the amount of $ 104.49, receipt number 180638. Deposited ((NEXT WORKING DAY)) in an Interest Bearing Account in compliance with L.R.67. **FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR DISBURSEMENT WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS** (jla) (Entered: 01/16/2009)

9538 ORDER Approving the Transfer of Funds for the Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2008−2009 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/15/2009.(cm) (Entered: 01/16/2009)

9540 Invoice number 1/09 in the amount of $57,311.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of December 2008. (cm) (Entered: 01/27/2009)

9542 ORDER finding as moot 9444 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/10/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/10/2009)

9543 ORDER noted 9510 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/10/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/10/2009)

9544 ORDER noted 9511 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/10/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/10/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 430 of 513

02/10/2009 02/11/2009
02/11/2009 02/11/2009
02/11/2009 02/11/2009
02/11/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 02/12/2009 02/13/2009
02/25/2009 03/02/2009
03/03/2009
03/06/2009

9545 ORDER noted 9531 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/10/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/10/2009)
9546 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9540 Invoice #1/09 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., in the amount of $57,311.00 for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of December 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/10/2009.(cm) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
9547 Invoice number 29176 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services covering transactions for the month of September 2008. (cm) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
9548 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9547 Invoice Number 29176 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services covering transactions for the month of September 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/10/2009.(cm) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
9549 Invoice number 29217 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services covering transactions for the month of October 2008. (cm) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
9550 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9549 Invoice number 29217 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services covering transactions for the month of October 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/10/2009.(cm) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
9551 Invoice number 29432 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services covering transactions for the month of November 2008. (cm) (Entered: 02/11/2009)
9552 ORDER noted 9444 Motion for extension of time Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/12/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
9553 ORDER noted 9456 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/12/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
9554 ORDER noted 9474 Motion for Leave to File Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/12/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
9555 ORDER noted 9501 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/12/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
9556 ORDER noted 9509 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/12/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
9557 ORDER noted 9512 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/12/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/12/2009)
9558 ORDER: This motion shall be stricken from the record since it alleges violations of inmate's civil rights which is the subject of the litigation being carried out in Civil Case No. 79−004(PG) re 9429 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/13/2009. (mt) (Entered: 02/13/2009)
9559 Invoice number 2/09 in the amount of $52,547.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of January 2009. (cm) (Entered: 02/26/2009)
9560 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9559 Invoice No. 2/09 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., in the amount of $52,547.00 for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of January 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/26/2009.(cm) (Entered: 03/02/2009)
9561 **STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD SEE (9566) ORDER
**INFORMATIVE Motion regarding non compliance of stipulation by state correctional facilities filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) . Modified on 3/18/2009 (cm). (Entered: 03/04/2009)
9562 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order, # 2

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 431 of 513

03/10/2009 03/12/2009 03/13/2009 03/17/2009 03/17/2009 03/19/2009 03/20/2009
03/20/2009 03/20/2009 03/24/2009 03/25/2009 03/27/2009 04/14/2009 04/16/2009 04/30/2009

August Invoice, # 3 September Invoice, # 4 October Invoice, # 5 November Invoice, # 6 December Invoice)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 03/06/2009)

9563 Invoice number 3/09 in the amount of $67,075.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of February 2009. (cm) (Entered: 03/10/2009)

9564 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 03/12/2009)

9565 ORDER Granted as requested. re 9564 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/13/2009. (mt) (Entered: 03/13/2009)

9566 ORDER: This motion shall be stricken from the record since it alleges violations of inmate's civil rights which is the subject of the litigation being carried out in Civil Case No. 79−004(PG) re 9561 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/16/2009. (mt) (Entered: 03/17/2009)

9572 Letter Motion for disbursement of funds filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (cm) (Entered: 03/25/2009)

9567 Invoice number 29571 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company, for professional services covering transactions for the month of December 2008. (cm) (Entered: 03/19/2009)

9568

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds payable to Nancy I Boneta−Lopez in the amount of $27,487.50, Motions terminated: 9562 MOTION Submitting Invoices for Consulting Services filed by Defendant−All. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/16/2009.(cm) Modified on 4/23/2009 to add payee name and amount(cm). (Entered: 03/20/2009)

9569 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9563 Invoice number 3/09 in the amount of $67,075.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of February 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/17/2009.(cm) (Entered: 03/20/2009)

9570 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9551 Invoice number 29432 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services covering transactions for the month of November 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/2009.(cm) (Entered: 03/20/2009)

9571 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9567 Invoice No. 29571, in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company, for professional services covering transactions for the month of December 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/23/2009.(cm) (Entered: 03/24/2009)

9573 ORDER Approving the Transfer of Funds for the THIRD QUARTER of Fiscal Year 2008−2009 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation, re: 9572 Letter Motion. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/24/2009.(cm) (Entered: 03/25/2009)

9574 NOTICE to Counsel filed in Misc. 09−59 re: Measures to address the congestion of the civil docket (Signed by All Judges).(cm) (Entered: 03/31/2009)

9575 Invoice number 4/09 in the amount of $69,893.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of March 2009. (cm) (Entered: 04/15/2009)

9576 **STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD SEE (9622) ORDER** INFORMATIVE MOTION for Permanent Injunction, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by Various Plaintiffs, pro se (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I, # 2 Envelope)(cm) Modified on 9/30/2009 (cm). (Entered: 04/17/2009)

9578 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9575 Invoice number 4/09 in the amount of $69,893.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of March 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/29/2009.(cm) (Entered: 04/30/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 432 of 513

05/12/2009 05/18/2009 05/19/2009
05/20/2009 05/26/2009 05/26/2009 06/09/2009 06/16/2009 06/18/2009
06/24/2009 07/01/2009 07/01/2009 07/01/2009 07/06/2009 07/06/2009

9580 Invoice number 5/09 in the amount of $76,590.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of April 2009. (cm) (Entered: 05/13/2009)

9581 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9580 Invoice number 5/09 in the amount of $76,590.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of April 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/15/2009.(cm) (Entered: 05/18/2009)

DEPOSIT of Funds in the amount of $364.86, receipt number 182424; $179.80, receipt number 182425 and $108.13, receipt number 182426. Deposited ((NEXT WORKING DAY)) in an Interest Bearing Account in compliance with L.R.67. **FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR DISBURSEMENT WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS**. (jla) (Entered: 05/19/2009)

DEPOSIT of Funds in the amount of $ 36.08, receipt number 182448. Deposited ((NEXT WORKING DAY)) in an Interest Bearing Account in compliance with L.R.67. **FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR DISBURSEMENT WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS**. (jla) (Entered: 05/20/2009)

9582 Letter MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (ov) (Entered: 05/26/2009)

9583 ORDER Approving 9582 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/22/09. (ov) (Entered: 05/26/2009)

9585 Invoice number 6/09 in the amount of $71,555.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of May 2009. (cm) (Entered: 06/10/2009)

9586 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/16/2009)

9587

MOTION to Strike PREVIOUS MOTION ON BUDGET AND REQUEST FOR FUNDS Re: 9586 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/6/2009 (Related document(s) 9586 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/18/2009)

9588 MOTION requesting Order to Use Photographic and Videotape Cameras on 24 Hour Notice filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 06/24/2009)

9590 ORDER The Clerk shall issue a check payable to the Civil Action and Education Corporation in the amount of $1,000,000.00 (One Million Dollars), granting 9586 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; terminating 9587 Motion to Strike.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/1/2009. (cm) (Entered: 07/01/2009)

9591 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9585 Invoice number 6/09 in the amount of $71,555.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of May 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/1/2009.(cm) (Entered: 07/01/2009)

9592 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: (9589) Proposal Report for the year 2009−2010 by Holgar Catolico Santisima Trinidad. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/1/2009.(cm) (Entered: 07/01/2009)

9594 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding in Compliance with Court Order filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 07/06/2009)

9595 MOTION for extension of time until July 26, 2009 to file Opposition re: 9588 Motion; filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/22/2009 (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) . (Entered: 07/06/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 433 of 513

07/14/2009 07/14/2009 07/14/2009 07/16/2009
07/16/2009 08/04/2009 08/11/2009 08/13/2009 08/13/2009 08/26/2009
08/26/2009
08/31/2009
08/31/2009 09/03/2009

9597 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds in the amount of $250,000 for consultant fees for CMC project as of April 30, 2009 filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (cm) (Entered: 07/14/2009)

9598 ORDER APPROVING 9597 Disbursement of Funds for the Correctional Medical Center, Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/13/2009. (cm) (Entered: 07/14/2009)

9599 Invoice number 7/09 in the amount of $73,529.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered relative to the stipulation during the month of June 2009. (cm) (Entered: 07/15/2009)

9600

ORDER granting 9588 Motion requesting Order. Plaintiffs attorneys may use photographic and video tape cameras without providing 24 hours notice, otherwise, the defendants would have the opportunity to correct any food services that are constitutionally deficient. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/15/2009. (cm) (Entered: 07/16/2009)

9601 ORDER denying 9595 Motion for extension of time. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/15/2009. (cm) (Entered: 07/16/2009)

9602 MOTION requesting Order to obtain copies of the docket from 1/2/09 to 7/31/09 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan Pro Se in the Spanish language. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(rc) Modified on 8/6/2009 to add docket text (rc). (Entered: 08/05/2009)

9603 Invoice number 8/09 in the amount of $62,302.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for Professional Services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of July 2009. (cm) (Entered: 08/13/2009)

9604 Invoice number 16847 in the amount of $203,658.02 payable to MGT of America for professional consulting services rendered during the month of December 2008. (cm) (Entered: 08/13/2009)

9605 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9599 Invoice Number 7/09 payable to Curnyn Consulting. Ltd., in the amount of $73,529.00 for professional services rendered relative to the Stipulation during the month of June 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/12/2009.(cm) (Entered: 08/13/2009)

9606

Motion for Contempt Against Defendants Administrator of Corrections and President and Members of the Parole Board for Failure to Abide by the Terms of the Montero Torres Stipulation filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/11/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit No. 1 − Montero Torres Stipulation and Court Order, # 2 Exhibit No. 2 − Order of Consolidation, # 3 Exhibit No. 3 − 19 March 2008 Deposition Excerpts)(Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 08/26/2009)

9607

Motion for Contempt Against Defendant Administrator of Corrections for Failure to Comply with the Mental Health Plan and the Plan for the Provision of Sociopenal Services filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/11/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit No. 1 − 29 May 2009 letter)(Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 08/26/2009)

9608

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9603 Invoice number 8/09 in the amount of $62,302.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for Professional Services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of July 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/14/2009.(cm) (Entered: 08/31/2009)

9609 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9604 Invoice number 16847 in the amount of $203,658.02 payable to MGT of America for professional consulting services rendered during the month of December 2008. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/14/2009.(cm) (Entered: 08/31/2009)

9610 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs for proceedings held on 10/29/2008 before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. (cm) (Entered: 09/03/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 434 of 513

09/08/2009 09/08/2009 09/09/2009 09/10/2009
09/11/2009
09/16/2009 09/16/2009 09/18/2009 09/18/2009 09/23/2009 09/29/2009
09/29/2009 09/29/2009 09/29/2009

9611 MOTION for Leave to File Document in Excess of Fifteen Pages filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/24/2009 (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 09/08/2009)

9612 Invoice number 9/09 in the amount of $57,199.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of August 2009. (cm) (Entered: 09/09/2009)

9613 ORDER Granted in part. re 9611 "Defendant's Motion for Leave to File Motion in Opposition Containing More Than Fifteen Pages". Opposition shall not exceed limit by more that five (5) pages. No more exceptions of this kind will be allowed. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/9/2009. (mt) (Entered: 09/09/2009)

9614

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9612 Invoice number 9/09 in the amount of $57,199.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of August 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/8/2009.(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2009)

9615

Memorandum in Opposition to Motion for Contempt filed by all defendants Re: 9607 Motion for Contempt Against Defendant Administrator of Corrections for Failure to Comply with the Mental Health Plan and the Plan for the Provision of Sociopenal Services filed by All Plaintiffs, 9606 Motion for Contempt Against Defendants Administrator of Corrections and President and Members of the Parole Board for Failure to Abide by the Terms of the Montero Torres Stipulation filed by All Plaintiffs filed by all defendants. (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 09/11/2009)

9616 ORDER noted 9594 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/16/2009. (mt) (Entered: 09/16/2009)

9617 First INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Kitchen and Food Services filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 09/16/2009)

9618 LETTER MOTION for approval of Operational Budget for Fiscal Year 2009−2010 and transfer of funds filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A & B)(cm) (Entered: 09/18/2009)

9619 ORDER APPROVING 9618 The Operational Budget and Transfer of Funds for the First Quarter of Fiscal Year 2009−2010 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/17/2009. (cm) (Entered: 09/18/2009)

9620 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Informative Motion at Docket No. 9617 filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/9/2009 (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) . (Entered: 09/23/2009)

9621

Motion in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike the Informative Motion (Interim Report) Related to Defendants' Work Performed in the Food−Services Area filed by Defendant−All Re: 9620 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Informative Motion at Docket No. 9617 filed by All Plaintiffs. (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) Modified on 10/5/2009 as to title and repetitive text (mim). (Entered: 09/29/2009)

9628 Invoice number 29711 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of January 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9629 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9628 Invoice No. 29711 in the amount of 2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company, for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of January 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/17/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9631 Invoice number 29882 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of February 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 435 of 513

09/29/2009
09/29/2009 09/29/2009 09/29/2009 09/29/2009 09/30/2009
09/30/2009
09/30/2009 09/30/2009 09/30/2009 10/01/2009 10/01/2009 10/01/2009 10/01/2009 10/01/2009

9632

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9631 Invoice No. 29882 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of February 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/17/2009.(cm) Modified on 10/1/2009 to add dollar amount (cm). (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9633 Invoice number 29960 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of March 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9634 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9633 Invoice No. 29960 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of March 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/17/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9635 Invoice number 29963 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of April 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9636 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9635 Invoice number 29963 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of April 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/17/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9622

ORDER: This document, written in the Spanish language, shall be stricken from the record. A copy of it shall be sent to attorney Carlos Garcia−Gutierrez. re 9576 MOTION for Permanent Injunction MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009.(mt) (Entered: 09/30/2009)

9623 ORDER re 9607 Motion for Contempt Against Defendant Administrator of Corrections for Failure to Comply with the Mental Health Plan and the Plan for the Provision of Sociopenal Services filed by All Plaintiffs, 9615 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion filed by defendants and 9606 Motion for Contempt Against Defendants Administrator of Corrections and President and Members of the Parole Board for Failure to Abide by the Terms of the Montero Torres Stipulation filed by
All Plaintiffs, Set Hearings Hearing on Motions for Contempt set for 10/5/2009 at 01:30 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.Signed
by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009.(ja) (Entered: 09/30/2009)

9624 ORDER denying 9602 Motion requesting Order Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009. (mt) (Entered: 09/30/2009)

9625 ORDER noted 9617 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009. (mt) (Entered: 09/30/2009)

9626 ORDER denying 9620 Motion to Strike Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009. (mt) (Entered: 09/30/2009)

9630 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9637 ORDER Granted and so Ordered. re 9630 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/1/2009. (mt) (Entered: 10/01/2009)

9638 Invoice number 31066 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of May 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)

9639 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9638 Invoice No. 31066 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of May 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)

9640 Invoice number 31067 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 436 of 513

10/01/2009
10/01/2009
10/01/2009
10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009 10/02/2009
10/03/2009
10/05/2009

June 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9641 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9640 Invoice No. 31067 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of June 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9642 Invoice number 31068 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of July 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9643 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9642 Invoice No. 31068 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of July 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/30/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9644 MOTION to Quash Subpoenas filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9645 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Carlos Crespo Febus for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9646 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Joel Cintron−Caraballo for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9647 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Santos Delgado−Morales for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9648 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Edward Martinez−Gonzalez for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9649 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Angel Cruz−Vazquez for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9650 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Angel Andino−Davila for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9651 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Jose Carlo−Salcedo for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9652 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Omar Marrero−Lopez for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9653 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Jose Luis Diaz for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9654 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Santos Ayala−Nieves for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9655 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Jose Torres−Rivera for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9656 Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Feliciano Rios−Disdier for 10/6/2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9657 ORDER denying 9644 Motion to Quash Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/2/2009. (mt) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9658 First MOTION for Reconsideration re 9657 Order on Motion to Quash filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/19/2009 (Related document(s) 9657 ) (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 10/02/2009)
9659 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Notice to the Court re Hearing filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 10/03/2009)
9660 MOTION requesting Order Pursuant to Local Rule 83.10 filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 10/05/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 437 of 513

10/05/2009
10/06/2009
10/08/2009 10/09/2009 10/09/2009 10/09/2009 10/09/2009 10/13/2009 10/13/2009 10/16/2009 10/21/2009 10/23/2009 10/23/2009

9664 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez:Hearing on motions for contempt set for 10/5/2009 was not held. Upon request of the defendants, the Court met with the parties in chambers to discuss defendants' proposed work plan and try to reach an agreement as to the issues before the court. Defendants will provide plaintiff with all documents requested at this in chambers conference and will advise the Court later this afternoon if parties have reached an agreement. If the agreement does not materialize, the contempt hearing will
commence tomorrow. Contempt Hearing reset for 10/6/2009 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (ja) (Entered: 10/09/2009)

9665

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez:In Chambers Conference held on 10/6/2009. Attorneys Present: Carlos Garcia−Guitierrez, Guillermo Ramos−Luina, Luis Henriquez, Alfredo Castellanos, Esther Crespin and Arleen de la Matta. Parties informed they have been thoroughly engaged in trying to reach an agreement. Documents have been exchanged and negotiations are ongoing. After counsel met in private, the Court was informed they had reach an agreement and the contempt hearing was no longer necessary. The parties were granted until this Friday to submit a sealed document wtih the terms and
conditions of the agreement. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 10/9/2009. (ja) (Entered: 10/09/2009)

9663 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 10/08/2009)

9666 Invoice number 10/09 in the amount of $69,546.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of September 2009. (cm) (Entered: 10/09/2009)

9667

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9666 Invoice number 10/09 in the amount of $69,546.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of September 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/8/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/09/2009)

9668 ORDER finding as moot 9606 Motion for Contempt; finding as moot 9607 Motion for Contempt; denying 9658 Motion for Reconsideration ; noted 9659 INFORMATIVE motion; noted 9660 Motion requesting Order Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/9/2009. (ja) (Entered: 10/09/2009)

9669 MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/16/2009 to file Stipulation filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/26/2009 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 10/09/2009)

9670 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, granting 9663 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/9/2009.(cm) (Entered: 10/13/2009)

9671 ORDER granting 9669 Motion for Extension of Time to File Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/13/2009. (mt) (Entered: 10/13/2009)

9672 Second MOTION for Extension of Time until October 21, 2009 to file Joint Document Stipulation filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/2/2009 (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 10/16/2009)

9673 ORDER granting 9672 Motion for Extension of Time to File Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/21/2009. (mt) (Entered: 10/21/2009)

9674 ORDER : In Chambers Conference set for 10/26/2009 at 05:00 PM
before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.Signed by Judge Juan M
Perez−Gimenez on 10/23/2009.(ja) (Entered: 10/23/2009)

9675 Motion In Compliance with Court Order filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 10/23/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 438 of 513

10/26/2009 10/30/2009
11/02/2009 11/02/2009 11/04/2009 11/04/2009 11/05/2009 11/06/2009 11/06/2009 11/09/2009 11/12/2009
11/16/2009 11/18/2009
12/01/2009 12/01/2009

9676 MOTION for Leave to Appear filed by Evelyn Aimee De Jesus−Rodriguez on behalf of Jesus Ramos−Cedeno Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/12/2009 (De Jesus−Rodriguez, Evelyn) (Entered: 10/26/2009)

9678

***SELECTED PARTIES***Joint MOTION Submitting STIPULATION regarding the Administration of Corrections and the Puerto Rico Parole Boards compliance with the Montero Torres Stipulation and the Administration of Corrections compliance with the plan for the provision of socio penal services and the provision of psychological services filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs, Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Settlement Stipulation)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) Modified on 11/3/2009 to edit text (cm). (Entered: 10/30/2009)

9679 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 11/02/2009)

9680 ORDER noted 9675 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/29/2009. (mt) (Entered: 11/02/2009)

9681 ORDER Granted and so Ordered 9679 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/4/2009. (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2009)

9682 ORDER Denied re 9676 Motion for Leave to Appear Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/4/2009. (mt) (Entered: 11/04/2009)

9683 ORDER The Stipulation is hereby APPROVED re: (9678) Motion submitting. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/4/2009. (cm) (Entered: 11/05/2009)

9684 Invoice number 31239 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of August 2009. (cm) (Entered: 11/06/2009)

9685 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9684 Invoice number 31239 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered covering transactions for the month of August 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/4/2009.(cm) (Entered: 11/06/2009)

9686 Invoice number 11/09 in the amount of $70,964.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of October 2009. (cm) (Entered: 11/09/2009)

9687

MOTION to Strike or in the Alternative Motion to Dismiss Re: 9677 MOTION for Order to Show Cause For Denying Attorney Visit to Inmate in Violation of Access to Court Rights as to Judith Matias−De−Leon filed by Jesus Ramos−Cedeno filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/30/2009 (Related document(s) 9677 ) (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 11/12/2009)

9688 ORDER Docket 9677 is hereby stricken from the Record of this case. re 9687 Motion to Strike 9677 MOTION for Order to Show Cause For Denying Attorney Visit to Inmate in Violation of Access to Court Rights as to Judith Matias−De−Leon Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/16/2009. (mt) (Entered: 11/16/2009)

9689

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9686 Invoice number 11/09 in the amount of $70,964.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of October 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/17/2009.(cm) (Entered: 11/18/2009)

9690 LETTER MOTION for Disbursement of Funds re: Operational Budget fiscal year 2009−2010 filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2009)

9691 ORDER APPROVING the transfer of funds for the second quarter of fiscal year 2009−2010 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation in the amount of $4,130,000, re: granting 9690 Letter Motion for Disbursement of Funds, Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/1/2009. (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 439 of 513

12/01/2009 12/01/2009
12/01/2009 12/02/2009 12/09/2009 12/14/2009
12/14/2009 12/15/2009 12/21/2009 12/21/2009 12/21/2009
12/22/2009 12/22/2009
12/24/2009 12/29/2009 12/29/2009 12/29/2009

9692 LETTER MOTION for Disbursement of Funds re: Correctional Medical Center (CMC) filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2009)

9693 ORDER APPROVING the disbursement of funds for the Correctional Medical Center in the amount of 250,000, granting 9692 Letter Motion for Disbursement of Funds, Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/1/2009. (cm) (Entered: 12/01/2009)

9694 INFORMATIVE Motion (in Spanish language), requesting copy of order as to federal monitors filed by Felix Espinosa Babilonia, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 12/02/2009)

9695 Invoice number 31561 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services for the month of September 2009. (cm) (Entered: 12/07/2009)

9696 MOTION Submitting Inmates' Disciplinary Manual filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Inmates' Disciplinary Manual)(Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 12/09/2009)

DEPOSIT of Funds in the amount of $ SEALED, receipt number 186504. Deposited ((NEXT WORKING DAY)) in an Interest Bearing Account in compliance with L.R.67. **FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR DISBURSEMENT WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS**. (jla) (Entered: 12/14/2009)

9697 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** Motion In Compliance filed by Esther Crespin−Credi, Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez, (cm) Modified on 12/15/2009 to edit text (cm). (Entered: 12/14/2009)

9698 Invoice number 12/09 in the amount of $65,208.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of November 2009. (cm) (Entered: 12/16/2009)

9699 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Compliance with Court Order filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 12/21/2009)

9700 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Seasons Holiday Recess filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 12/21/2009)

9757 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9695 Invoice number 31561 in the amount of $2,300.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services for the month of September 2009. (cm) (Entered: 12/07/2009). Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/21/2009.(cm) (Entered: 05/03/2010)

9701 AMENDED ORDER for the approved Operational Budget of Correctional Health Services Corporation for Fiscal Year 2009−2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/21/2009.(cm) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

9702

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9698 Invoice number 12/09 in the amount of $65,208.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of November 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/21/2009.(cm) (Entered: 12/22/2009)

9703 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 12/24/2009)

9704 ORDER noted 9697 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/28/2009. (mt) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

9705 ORDER noted 9699 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/28/2009. (mt) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

9706 ORDER noted 9700 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/28/2009. (mt) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 440 of 513

12/29/2009 01/04/2010 01/08/2010 01/12/2010 01/19/2010
01/22/2010 01/29/2010 02/01/2010 02/03/2010 02/04/2010 02/08/2010 02/08/2010
02/09/2010 02/09/2010 02/11/2010 02/11/2010 02/12/2010
02/17/2010

9707 ORDER Granted as requested and so Ordered. re 9703 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/28/2009. (mt) (Entered: 12/29/2009)

9709 ORDER Directing Construction of the Correctional Medical Center. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/4/2010.(cm) (Entered: 01/04/2010)

9710 ORDER for sale of investment instruments with Santander Securities. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2009.(cm) (Entered: 01/13/2010)

9711 Invoice number 1/10 in the amount of $30,397.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of December 2009. (cm) (Entered: 01/13/2010)

9713

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9711 Invoice number 1/10 in the amount of $30,397.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of December 2009. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/14/2010.(cm) (Entered: 01/19/2010)

9714 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 01/22/2010)

9715 AMENDED ORDER DIRECTING CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CENTER. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/28/2010.(cm) (Entered: 01/29/2010)

9716 Motion In Compliance with October 2009 Stipulation (Docket 9678−2) filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 02/01/2010)

9717 ORDER granting 9714 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/3/2010. (mt) (Entered: 02/03/2010)

9718 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion at Docket No. 9716 filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/22/2010 (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 02/04/2010)

9719 Memorandum in Opposition to Motion to Strike filed by Defendant−All Re: 9718 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion at Docket No. 9716 filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Defendant−All. (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 02/08/2010)

9720 Motion for Contempt Against the Hon. Carlos Molina−Rodriguez for Failure to Comply With the Court's Orders Regarding Food Services filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/24/2010 (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 02/08/2010)

9721 MOTION for Leave to Reply filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 02/09/2010)

9722 Invoice number 2/10 in the amount of $53,068.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of January 2010. (cm) (Entered: 02/10/2010)

9723 ORDER granting 9696 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/11/2010. (mt) (Entered: 02/11/2010)

9724 ORDER granting 9721 Motion for Leave to Reply . Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/11/2010. (mt) Modified on 2/12/2010 to edit text(cm). (Entered: 02/11/2010)

9725 ORDER granting 9722 Invoice number 2/10 in the amount of $53,068.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of January 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/11/2010.(cm) (Entered: 02/12/2010)

9726 MOTION for Extension of Time until April 5, 2010 to File Response/Reply as to 9720 Motion for Contempt Against the Hon. Carlos Molina−Rodriguez for Failure to Comply With the Court's Orders Regarding Food Services filed by All Plaintiffs

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 441 of 513

02/21/2010
02/24/2010 02/26/2010
03/02/2010 03/02/2010 03/02/2010 03/02/2010 03/03/2010 03/04/2010 03/09/2010 03/10/2010 03/10/2010 03/23/2010
04/04/2010

filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/5/2010 (Related document(s) 9720 ) (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 02/17/2010)

9727

REPLY to Response to Motion filed by all plaintiffs Re: 9721 MOTION for Leave to Reply filed by All Plaintiffs, 9718 MOTION to Strike Defendants' Motion at Docket No. 9716 filed by All Plaintiffs, 9716 Motion In Compliance with October 2009 Stipulation (Docket 9678−2) filed by Defendant−All filed by all plaintiffs. (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 02/21/2010)

9728 MOTION requesting Order for Expedited Discovery and Other Matters filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 02/24/2010)

9729 ORDER re 9720 Motion for Contempt Against the Hon. Carlos Molina−Rodriguez for Failure to Comply With the Court's Orders Regarding Food Services filed by All
Plaintiffs : Show Cause Hearing set for 5/3/2010 at 09:30 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. Status Conference set for 3/10/2010 at 01:30 PM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.Signed
by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/26/2010.(ja) (Entered: 02/26/2010)

9730 ORDER noted 9716 Motion In Compliance; noted 9718 Motion to Strike ; noted 9719 Response in Opposition, Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/26/2010. (cm) (Entered: 03/02/2010)

9731 ORDER noted re 9727 Reply to Response to Motion, filed by Jesus Ramos−Cedeno, Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Judith Matias−De−Leon. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/26/2010.(cm) (Entered: 03/02/2010)

9732 ORDER granting 9726 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply,
Response to Motion Deadline due by 4/5/2010.
Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/26/2010. (cm) (Entered: 03/02/2010)

9733 ORDER granting 9728 Motion requesting Order for Expedited Discovery. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/26/2010. (cm) (Entered: 03/02/2010)

9734 MOTION for Reduction of Time to Respond filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 03/03/2010)

9735 ORDER :Upon oral request by defense counsel, Status Conference is hereby RESET for 3/10/2010 at 09:30 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/4/2010.(ja)
(Entered: 03/04/2010)

9736 MOTION requesting Order to Reduce Discovery Term filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 03/09/2010)

9737 ORDER granting 9734 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief ; granting 9736 Motion requesting Order. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/10/2010. (sr) (Entered: 03/10/2010)

9738 Invoice number 3/10 in the amount of $69,042.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of February 2010. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 03/16/2010)

9739

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds granting 9738 Invoice number 3/10 in the amount of $69,042.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of February 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/19/2010.(cm) (Entered: 03/23/2010)

9740 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 04/04/2010)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 442 of 513

04/05/2010 04/08/2010 04/08/2010 04/09/2010 04/15/2010 04/16/2010 04/16/2010
04/19/2010 04/19/2010 04/22/2010 04/23/2010 04/26/2010 04/27/2010

9741 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by all plaintiffs Re: 9740 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Defendant−All filed by all plaintiffs. (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 04/05/2010)

9742 Invoice number 4/10 in the amount of $76,198.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of March 2010. (cm) (Entered: 04/09/2010)

9743 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for the First Trimester of 2010 for the Correctional Medical Center filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (cm) (Entered: 04/09/2010)

9744 ORDER APPROVING the Disbursement of Funds for the First Trimester of 2010 for the Correctional Medical Center, granting 9743 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/8/2010. (cm) (Entered: 04/09/2010)

9749 MOTION for Permanent Injunction filed by Various Plaintiffs Confined at 448 Correctional Institute in Bayamon. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/3/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 04/19/2010)

9747 MOTION requesting Order to Schedule a Status Conference filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 04/16/2010)

9748 ORDER granting 9747 Motion requesting Order Status Conference set for 4/27/2010 at 03:00 PM before Judge Juan
M Perez−Gimenez. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/16/2010.
(ja) (Entered: 04/16/2010)

9750 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for the Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2009−2010 filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation (cm) (Entered: 04/19/2010)

9751 ORDER APPROVING the Transfer of Funds for the Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2009−2010 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation, re: 9750 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/16/2010. (cm) (Entered: 04/19/2010)

9752 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 04/22/2010)

9753 MOTION for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 04/23/2010)

9754 ORDER Noted re 9741 Response in Opposition to Motion filed by Jesus Ramos−Cedeno, Salvador Borta−Lebron, All Plaintiffs, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Judith Matias−De−Leon Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 04/26/2010.(mt) (Entered: 04/26/2010)

9777

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez:Status Conference held on 4/27/2010. Attorneys present: Carlos Garcia−Gutierrez, Guillermo Ramos & Luis Henriquez for plaintiffs; Esther Crispin & Arlene De La Matta for defendants. Attorney Alfredo Castellanos for AOC and Mirta Rodriguez for GPR were also present. Defendants have reviewed plaintiffs' allegations and have put together a remedial plan which they submit to plaintiffs for their consideration. Defendants requested 120 days to put in practice this plan in an effort to address allegations made plaintiffs in their Motion for Contempt re: Court's Orders regarding food services, Dkt# 9720. Plaintiffs expressed their concern as to defendants' lack of resources to improve the food services. Plfts requested an extension of time to review the plan submitted by defendants and stated that the only way they would agree to a stipulation is if it included economic sanctions for defendants non−compliance. After parties stated their positions regarding plaintiffs' allegations of non−compliance, the Court granted the parties until Monday, May 3rd to try to reach a stipulation. If on Monday there are still some items to discuss and there is a possibility to each an agreement, the Court will grant them until Tuesday,

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 443 of 513

04/28/2010
04/28/2010
05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010

May 4th to reach a final solution. Counsel to keep the Court informed of their
progress. Advise Court of Settlement Deadline due by 5/3/2010. (ja)
(Entered: 05/04/2010)
9755 ORDER granting 9742 Invoice number 4/10 in the amount of $76,198.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of March 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/26/2010.(cm) (Entered: 04/28/2010)
9756 ORDER re 9752 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Civil Action and
Education Corporation The Clerk of Court shall disburse to the Civil Action and Education Corporation the sum of Three Hundred Thousand Dollars ($300,000.) immediately. The remaining Three Hundred Thousand Dollars shall be disbursed at a later time.
Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 04/28/2010.(mt) s/c: Finance Section(cm). (Entered: 04/28/2010)
9758 ORDER granting 9753 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/3/2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9759 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Luis Rivera−Rivera for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9760 NOTICE of Appearance by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Lausell−Recurt, Steven) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9761 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Maria Noriega Hostos for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9762 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Edwin Colon Martinez for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9763 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Emilio Fuentes Centeno for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9764 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Ramon Rivera−Caraballo for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9765 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Gabriel Baez Gonzalez for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9766 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Alex Agosto Piris for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9767 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Juan Echevarria De Leon for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9768 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Peter Jimenez−Hernandez for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9769 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Edwin Colon Martinez for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9770 ***SELECTED PARTIES***AMENDED Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Emilio Fuentes Centeno for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9771 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Ramon Rivera Caraballo for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9772 ***SELECTED PARTIES***AMENDED Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Gabriel Baez−Gonzalez for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9773 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Amended Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Alex Agosto Piris for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)
9774 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Luis Quinonez−Santiago for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 444 of 513

05/03/2010 05/03/2010 05/03/2010
05/04/2010 05/05/2010 05/06/2010
05/06/2010

9775 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Carmen Alicea Rivera for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)

9776 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Testificandum Issued as to Carlos Martes−Morales for May 4, 2010. (ja) (Entered: 05/03/2010)

9778

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez: Attorneys present: Carlos Garcia−Gutierrez, Guillermo Ramos, Luis Henriquez and Steven Lausell for plaintiffs; Esther Crespin & Arlene De La Matta for defendants; Attys Alfredo Castellanos for AOC and Mirta Rodriguez for GPR. Case called for Order to Show Cause Hearing re: Contempt Motion on 5/3/2010, but same was not held. Parties apprised the Court as to their efforts to reach an agreement on the matter pending before the Court. Defendants informed that after the last meeting with the Court, they had several communications with plaintiffs in order to iron out the monetary sanctions and address the issues presented by plaintiffs. Defendants presented their recently amended remedial plan and plaintiffs stated their objections to defendants' proposal. After hearing both parties, the Court advised the parties that if there is no meeting of the minds the Contempt Hearing will start tomorrow, May 4th, at 9:00 AM. The Court granted plaintiff's Motion for issuance of Writs of
Habeas Corpus. Contempt Hearing set for 5/4/2010 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.)
(ja) (Entered: 05/06/2010)

9779 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez:First day of Contempt Hearing held on 5/4/2010. Testimony was heard on behalf of the
plaintiffs. Exhs admitted: 1,2,32,33,24,1,5A,5B,5C,9A,9C. Contempt Hearing to resume on 5/5/2010 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (ja) (Entered: 05/06/2010)

9780 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez:Second day of Contempt Hearing held on 5/5/2010. Further testimony was heard on behalf of the plaintiffs. Exhs admitted: 25−31, 21,22,23,3,34,11A−11E, 11−I−11N,7,
15M−15O,19S−19W, 19JJ−19LL, 25−31. Contempt Hearing to resume on 5/6/2010 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court
Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (ja) (Entered: 05/06/2010)

9782 Transcript of Proceedings held on 5/4/2010, Contempt Hearing, Day 2, before Sr. Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle, 787−587−7979, email: joycedelvalle@earthlink.net.

NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov.

Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER or the Court Reporter. Redaction Request due 6/1/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/9/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/9/2010. (jdv) (Entered: 05/06/2010)
9783 Transcript of Proceedings held on 5/5/2010, Contempt Hearing, Day 3, before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle, 787−587−7979, email: joycedelvalle@earthlink.net.

NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov.

Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER or the Court Reporter. Redaction

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 445 of 513

05/06/2010
05/06/2010 05/07/2010
05/07/2010 05/10/2010 05/10/2010 05/10/2010 05/11/2010 05/12/2010

Request due 6/1/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/9/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/9/2010. (jdv) (Entered: 05/06/2010)
9786 Transcript of Proceedings held on Monday, May 3, 2010, before Judge Senior Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter/Transcriber Joyce Del Valle. Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle, 787−587−7979, email: joycedelvalle@earthlink.net.
NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 6/1/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/9/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/9/2010. **THIS DOCKET ENTRY REPLACES (9781) MARKED FILED IN ERROR** (cm) . (Entered: 05/10/2010)
9788 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez:Third day of Contempt Hearing held on 5/6/2010. Further testimony was heard on behalf of
plaintiffs. Plffs' Exhs: 16A−C, 17A, 17C−E, 14A−C, 35, 36. Contempt Hearing set for 5/7/2010 at 09:00 AM before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (Attachments: # 1 Medical
Certificate of Ramon Rivera Caraballo, # 2 Subpoena Luis Casanova) (ja) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
9784 Transcript of Proceedings held on 5/6/2010, Contempt Hearing, Day 4, before Sr. Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle, 787−587−7979, email: joycedelvalle@earthlink.net.
NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov.
Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER or the Court Reporter. Redaction Request due 6/1/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/10/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/9/2010. (jdv) (Entered: 05/07/2010)
9785 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez: Fourth day
of Contempt Hearing held on 5/7/2010. Further Contempt Hearing set for 5/10/2010 09:00 AM in Courtroom 2 before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (cr) (Entered: 05/10/2010)
9787 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez: Fifth Day of Contempt Hearing held on 5/10/2010. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (br) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
9789 AMENDED Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez: Fifth Day of Contempt Hearing held on 5/10/2010. Exhibits will be kept by the Court. (Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle.) (br) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
9790 Exhibit List by defendants.(br) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
9791 Exhibit List by Plaintiffs.. (ja) (Entered: 05/11/2010)
9792 Transcript of Proceedings held on 5/10/2010, Day 6, Contempt Hearing, before Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez. Court Reporter Joyce Del Valle, 787−587−7979, email: joycedelvalle@earthlink.net.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 446 of 513

05/12/2010 05/13/2010 05/18/2010 05/18/2010 05/19/2010 05/20/2010 05/27/2010
06/02/2010
06/02/2010 06/09/2010 06/10/2010 06/14/2010 06/15/2010

NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov.

Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER or the Court Reporter. Redaction Request due 6/7/2010. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/15/2010. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/13/2010. (jdv) (Entered: 05/12/2010)

9794 Invoice number 5/10 in the amount of $84,904.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of April 2010. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 05/13/2010)

9793 MOTION requesting Order for the compliance of mental health services filed by a Group of Prisoners of the Mental Health Program, Pro se, in the Spanish language. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(er) (Entered: 05/13/2010)

9795 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Canteen Correctional Services for proceedings held on May 4, 2010 before Judge Perez Jimenez.. (Nazario−Briceno, Miguel) Modified on 5/20/2010 to remove restrictions(cm). (Entered: 05/18/2010)

9796 MOTION to Unseal Document at Docket No. 9795 filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 05/18/2010)

9797 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** MOTION to Unseal Document 9795 as to Counsel of Record filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of Defendant−All (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 05/19/2010)

9798 ORDER granting 9796 Motion to Unseal Document ; granting 9797 Motion to Unseal Document, re: 9795 Transcript Request.. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/20/2010. (cm) (Entered: 05/20/2010)

9799

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9794 Invoice number 5/10 in the amount of $84,904.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of April 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/25/2010.(cm) (Entered: 05/27/2010)

9800

Invoice number 32220 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the months of February and March 2010, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with case no. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, including system maintenance. (cm) (Entered: 06/02/2010)

9801 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/02/2010)

9802 ORDER Granted and so Ordered 9801 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 06/09/2010. (mt) (Entered: 06/09/2010)

9804 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9800 Invoice number 32220 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the months of February and March 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/9/2010.(ni) (Entered: 06/14/2010)

9803 ORDER APPROVING the transfer of Funds for the Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2009−2010 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation, re 9801 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 6/9/2010.(er) (Entered: 06/14/2010)

9806 **STRICKEN FROM THE RECORD***Invoice number 6/10 in the amount of $84,522.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD., for professional services rendered

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 447 of 513

06/22/2010
06/30/2010
07/01/2010 07/02/2010 07/09/2010 07/12/2010 07/12/2010
07/16/2010 07/16/2010 07/16/2010 07/16/2010 07/16/2010
07/23/2010
07/23/2010

and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of May 2010. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (ni) Modified on 8/10/2010 (cm). (Entered: 06/16/2010)

DEPOSIT of Funds in the amount of $.71, receipt number 189447; $36.93, receipt number 189448; $2.90, receipt number 189449; $2.50, receipt number 189450; $45.17, receipt number 189451; $13.91, receipt number 189452 and $30.48, receipt number 189453. Deposited ((NEXT WORKING DAY)) in an Interest Bearing Account in compliance with L.R.67. **FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR DISBURSEMENT WITHIN 7 WORKING DAYS**. (jla) (Entered: 06/22/2010)

9807

MOTION for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CAEC Financial Statements, 30 June 2008, # 2 Exhibit CAEC Financial Statements, 30 June 2009)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/30/2010)

9809 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez filed by Arlene De−La−Matta−Melendez on behalf of Defendant−All (De−La−Matta−Melendez, Arlene) (Entered: 07/01/2010)

9810 MOTION for Disposition of Outstanding Issues and Approval of the Inmate Classification Manual filed by Luis A. Henriquez−Carrero on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 29 October 2008 hearing transcript)(Henriquez−Carrero, Luis) (Entered: 07/02/2010)

9812 NOTICE of Appearance by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 07/09/2010)

9813 ORDER granting 9807 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 7/9/2010. (cm) (Entered: 07/12/2010)

9814

MOTION for Extension of Time until July 27, 2010 to File Response/Reply as to 9810 MOTION for Disposition of Outstanding Issues and Approval of the Inmate Classification Manual filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of Defendant−All Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/29/2010 (Related document(s) 9810 ) (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 07/12/2010)

9815 ORDER finding as moot 9694 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 07/16/2010. (mt) (Entered: 07/16/2010)

9816 ORDER noted 9720 Motion for Contempt Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 07/16/2010. (mt) (Entered: 07/16/2010)

9817 ORDER granting 9809 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 07/16/2010. (mt) (Entered: 07/16/2010)

9818 ORDER noted 9810 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 07/16/2010. (mt) (Entered: 07/16/2010)

9819

ORDER granting 9814 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 9810 MOTION for Disposition of Outstanding Issues and Approval of the Inmate Classification Manual filed by All Plaintiffs . Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/2/2010 Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 07/16/2010. (mt) Modified on 7/16/2010 to remove repetitive text (cm). (Entered: 07/16/2010)

9820

ORDER APPROVING the 9836 Operational Budget of Fiscal Year 2010−2011 and the Transfer of Funds for the First Quarter to the Correctional Health Services Corporation. Signed by Judge Gustavo A. Gelpi on 7/21/2010 for Judge Juan M. Perez−Gimenez.(cm) Modified on 9/23/2010 to add docket entry relationship (cm). (Entered: 07/23/2010)

9821 RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by All Defendants Re: 9810 MOTION for Disposition of Outstanding Issues and Approval of the Inmate Classification Manual filed by All Plaintiffs filed by All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Curnyn Consultants' Opinion)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 07/23/2010)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 448 of 513

07/27/2010 07/31/2010
08/05/2010 08/10/2010 08/10/2010
08/13/2010 08/23/2010
09/07/2010 09/08/2010 09/10/2010
09/10/2010
09/16/2010 09/22/2010 09/23/2010 09/23/2010 09/23/2010
09/30/2010

9822 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding violations to stipulations in this case, filed by Dario Castillo−Robles Pro Se and in representation of Members of Guayama 500, in the Spanish language. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(ni) (Entered: 07/29/2010)

9823 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding TO APPRISE THE HONORABLE COURT OFDEFENDANTS INITIATIVES IN THE AREA OF SECURITY filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Recruitment announcement)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 07/31/2010)

9824 ORDER noted 9823 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 08/05/2010. (mt) (Entered: 08/05/2010)

9825 Invoice number 6/10R in the amount of $84,083.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of May 2010. (cm) (Entered: 08/10/2010)

9826

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9825 Invoice number 6/10R in the amount of $84,083.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of May 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 8/9/2010.(cm) (Entered: 08/10/2010)

9828 MOTION REGARDING THE DOCKET OF THE CASE AT BAR filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of Defendant−All (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 08/13/2010)

9829 Invoice number 7/10 in the amount of $79,563.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of June 2010. (Attachments: # 1 Receipts) (cm) (Entered: 08/26/2010)

9830 Invoice number 8/10 in the amount of $70,040.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of July 2010. (cm) (Entered: 09/08/2010)

9831 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 09/08/2010)

9832 ORDER granting 9829 Invoice number 7/10 in the amount of $79,563.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of June 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/10/2010.(cm) (Entered: 09/10/2010)

9833 ORDER granting 9830 Invoice number 8/10 in the amount of $70,040.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of July 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/10/2010.(cm) . (Entered: 09/13/2010)

9834 NOTICE of Appearance by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 09/16/2010)

9835 ORDER Granted as Requested. 9831 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 09/22/2010. (mt) (Entered: 09/22/2010)

9836 Operational Budget for Fiscal Year 2010−2011 by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (cm) (Entered: 09/23/2010)

9837 Invoice in the amount of $450,000 re: new funding request for the Correctional Medical Center filed by Correctional Health Services Corp. (cm) (Entered: 09/23/2010)

9838 ORDER APPROVING the disbursment of funds for the First Trimester of 2010 for the Correctional Medical Center re: 9837 Invoice in the amount of $450,000 for the Correctional Medical Center filed by Correctional Health Services Corp., Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 9/22/2010.(cm) (Entered: 09/23/2010)

9839 Invoice number 9/10 in the amount of $65,531.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 449 of 513

10/18/2010 10/20/2010 10/25/2010 10/25/2010 11/01/2010 11/01/2010 11/05/2010
11/08/2010 11/08/2010

the Stipulation during the month of August 2010. (cm) (Entered: 10/07/2010)

9850 MOTION requesting the transfer of funds for the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2010−2011 filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (cm) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

9841 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Compliance with Stipulation Regarding Classification of 1994 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 10/20/2010)

9845

Invoice number 32790 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the months of April and May 2010, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, including system maintenance. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 10/25/2010)

9846

Invoice number 33441 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company, for professional services rendered during the months of July through September 2010, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with the case 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, including system maintenance. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 10/25/2010)

9847

ORDER For Payment of Services to RSM ROC & Company, re: 9845 Invoice number 32790 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the months of April and May 2010, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, including system maintenance. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/28/2010.(cm) (Entered: 11/01/2010)

9848

ORDER for Payment of Services to RSM ROC & Company re: 9846 Invoice number 33441 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company, for professional services rendered during the months of July through September 2010, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with the case 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended June 30, 2010, including system maintenance. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 10/28/2010.(cm) (Entered: 11/01/2010)

9849

MOTION Submitting translated documents filed by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 5−A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 5−B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 5−C, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 11−A, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 11−B, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 11−C, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 11−D, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 11−E, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 11−I, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 11−J, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 11−K, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 11−L, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 11−M, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 11−N, # 15 Exhibit Exhibit 14−A, # 16 Exhibit Exhibit 14−B, # 17 Exhibit Exhibit 14−C, # 18 Exhibit Exhibit 15−M, # 19 Exhibit Exhibit 15−N, # 20 Exhibit Exhibit 15−O, # 21 Exhibit Exhibit 16−A, # 22 Exhibit Exhibit 16−B, # 23 Exhibit Exhibit 16−C, # 24 Exhibit Exhibit 17−A, # 25 Exhibit Exhibit 17−C, # 26 Exhibit Exhibit 17−D, # 27 Exhibit Exhibit 17−E, # 28 Exhibit Exhibit 19−S, # 29 Exhibit Exhibit 19−T, # 30 Exhibit Exhibit 19−U, # 31 Exhibit Exhibit 19−V, # 32 Exhibit Exhibit 19−W, # 33 Exhibit Exhibit 19−JJ, # 34 Exhibit Exhibit 19−KK, # 35 Exhibit Exhibit 19−LL, # 36 Exhibit Exhibit 23, # 37 Exhibit Exhibit 24, # 38 Exhibit Exhibit 33, # 39 Exhibit Exhibit 34, # 40 Exhibit Exhibit 35, # 41 Exhibit Exhibit 37 (pp. 1−50), # 42 Exhibit Exhibit 37 (pp. 51−100), # 43 Exhibit Exhibit 37 (pp. 101−124))(Lausell−Recurt, Steven) . (Entered: 11/05/2010)

9851 ORDER approving 9850 the transfer of funds for the second and third quarters of fiscal year 2010−2011 filed by Correctional Health Services, Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/5/2010. (cm) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

9852 ORDER granting 9839 Invoice number 9/10 in the amount of $65,531.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, LTD., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of August 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/5/2010.(cm) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 450 of 513

11/17/2010 11/18/2010 11/18/2010 11/23/2010 11/29/2010 11/30/2010 12/01/2010 12/01/2010
12/01/2010 12/02/2010 12/02/2010 12/03/2010

9855 Invoice number 10/10 in the amount of $72,053.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of September 2010. (cm) (Entered: 11/22/2010)

9853

Motion In Compliance with order regarding population capacities and Informative Motion in compliance with paragraph 44 of the Stipulation regarding custodial and sociopenal staffing filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Post Analysis)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 11/29/2010 to edit upper case text(cm). (Entered: 11/18/2010)

9854

MOTION for Judgment, MOTION to dismiss AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS REGARDING INMATES RIGHTS TO ACCESS TO COURTS as to All Defendants filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/6/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Memorandum of Law in Support)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 11/18/2010)

9856

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9855 Invoice number 10/10 in the amount of $72,053.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of September 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/22/2010.(cm) (Entered: 11/23/2010)

9857 Invoice number 11/10 in the amount of $52,943.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of October 2010. (cm) (Entered: 11/30/2010)

9858

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9857 Invoice number 11/10 in the amount of $52,943.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of October 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 11/29/2010.(cm) (Entered: 11/30/2010)

9859 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/01/2010)

9860

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 9854 MOTION for JudgmentMOTION to dismiss AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS REGARDING INMATES RIGHTS TO ACCESS TO COURTS as to All Defendants filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero filed by All Plaintiffs. (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/01/2010)

9861 NOTICE of Appearance of TANAIRA PADILLA−RODRIGUEZ by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 12/01/2010)

9862 OPINION AND ORDER. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2010.(ASJ) (Entered: 12/02/2010)

9863 ORDER granting 9859 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 12/2/2010. (cm) (Entered: 12/02/2010)

9864

MOTION for Leave to File Document REPLY TO PLAINTIFFS MOTION TITLED PLAINTIFFS OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS MOTION REQUESTING PARTIAL JUDGMENT AND/OR MOTION TO DISMISS AS TO PLAINTIFFS CLAIMS REGARDING INMATES RIGHTS TO ACCESS TO COURTS filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/20/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Reply)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/03/2010)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 451 of 513

12/03/2010 12/12/2010
12/12/2010
12/13/2010
12/13/2010 12/13/2010 12/15/2010 12/15/2010

9865 Letter (in Spanish language) from Inmate Population Guayama 1000 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (cm) (Entered: 12/08/2010)

9866

MOTION for Reconsideration re 9862 Opinion and Order filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/30/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit 5−A, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit 6, # 8 Exhibit Exhibit 7, # 9 Exhibit Exhibit 7−A, # 10 Exhibit Exhibit 8, # 11 Exhibit Exhibit 8−A, # 12 Exhibit Exhibit 9, # 13 Exhibit Exhibit 10, # 14 Exhibit Exhibit 11)(Related document(s) 9862 ) (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 12/12/2010)

9867

**FILED IN ERROR−NO EXHIBITS ATTACHED** MOTION Submitting Exhibits re: 9866 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9862 Opinion and Order filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants (Related document(s) 9866 ) (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) Modified on 12/13/2010 (cm). (Entered: 12/12/2010)

9868

MOTION Submitting EXHIBITS re: 9866 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9862 Opinion and Order filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Related document(s) 9866 ) (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) Modified on 12/13/2010 to edit repetitive text (cm). (Entered: 12/13/2010)

9869 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits by Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 13, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 13A) (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 12/13/2010)

9870 NOTICE of Filing Exhibits by Defendant−All (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 15, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 15 A) (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 12/13/2010)

9871 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 12/15/2010)

9872

MEMORANDUM in Opposition to Defendants' Motion Pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the FRCP Regarding the Opinion and Order of this Court Dated December 2, 2010 as to Food Services filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 9866 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9862 Opinion and Order , filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Dr. Jose E. Soler Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero filed by All Plaintiffs. (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) Modified on 12/16/2010 to edit repetitive text(cm). (Entered: 12/15/2010)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 452 of 513

12/17/2010 12/21/2010 12/28/2010 01/12/2011 01/14/2011 01/24/2011 02/01/2011
02/01/2011 02/08/2011 02/09/2011 02/11/2011
02/16/2011 02/25/2011 02/25/2011

9873 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding that Plaintiffs' Lead Counsel will be away from 18 December 2010 until 8 January 2011 filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Carlos V Garcia (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) . (Entered: 12/17/2010)

9874

MOTION for Leave to File Document Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' 9866 Motion Pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure As to Food Services filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/10/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) . (Entered: 12/21/2010)

9875 Invoice number 1/11 in the amount of $70,296.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of November 2010. (cm) (Entered: 12/28/2010)

9882 Invoice number 2/11 in the amount of $39,357.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of December 2010. (cm) (Entered: 02/02/2011)

9877

Motion In Compliance WITH OPINION AND ORDER DATED DECEMBER 2, 2010 RELATED TO FOOD SERVICES (DOCKET NO. 9862) filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 01/14/2011)

9879 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** INFORMATIVE Motion (in Spanish language) regarding Prison Conditions at Guayama, PR filed by inmate K. Siragusa De−Jesus, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 01/26/2011)

9880

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9875 Invoice number 1/11 in the amount of $70,296.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of November 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 1/28/2011.(cm) (Main Document 9880 replaced on 2/2/2011) to correct signature date(cm). Order regenerated to all parties concerned. (Entered: 02/01/2011)

9881

Invoice number 33943 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the months of October and November 2010, in connection with the accounting for the transaction of funds related with case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, including system maintenance. (cm) (Entered: 02/01/2011)

9883 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 02/08/2011)

9884

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9882 Invoice number 2/11 in the amount of $39,357.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of December 2010. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/8/2011.(cm) (Entered: 02/09/2011)

9885

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9881 Invoice number 33943 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the months of October and November 2010, in connection with the accounting for the transaction of funds related with case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, including system maintenance. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/8/2011.(cm) (Entered: 02/11/2011)

9886 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER granting 9883 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/16/2011. (cm) (Entered: 02/16/2011)

9887 ORDER noted 9877 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 02/25/2011. (mt) (Entered: 02/25/2011)

9888 ORDER on Funding of The Correctional Medical Center. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 2/25/2011.(cm) (Entered: 02/25/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 453 of 513

03/02/2011 03/02/2011 03/07/2011 03/22/2011 03/30/2011 03/30/2011 04/01/2011
04/12/2011 04/12/2011 04/12/2011 04/13/2011 04/14/2011 04/14/2011
04/14/2011
04/14/2011

9889 ORDER as to moving this litigation to closure. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/1/2011.(cm) (Entered: 03/02/2011)

9890 ORDER noted 9740 INFORMATIVE motion; denying 9749 Motion for Permanent Injunction; denying 9793 Motion requesting Order; noted 9822 INFORMATIVE motion; finding as moot 9828 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 3/2/2011. (ja) (Entered: 03/02/2011)

9895 Invoice number 3/11 in the amount of $76,767.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc. for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of January 2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Proposed Order) (ni) (Entered: 04/07/2011)

9896 Invoice number 4/11 in the amount of $83,204.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc. for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of February 2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Proposed Order) (ni) (Entered: 04/07/2011)

9891 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** INFORMATIVE Motion (in Spanish language) regarding non compliance of federal stipulations of the Administracion de Correccion y Rehabilitacion filed by inmate Gilberto Valentin−Valentin. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(er) (Entered: 03/31/2011)

9892 (court only) REPORT on the use of fine funds by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of January, February and March 2011. (er) (Entered: 03/31/2011)

9893

Motion In Compliance with March 2, 2011 Order at Docket 9889, MOTION for extension of time until May 4, 2011 to to comply with March 2, 2011 order( Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/18/2011) filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 04/01/2011)

9897 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Compliance in Crowding filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Parties (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 04/12/2011)

9898 MOTION to inform cases for legal representation, etc. filed by Rosendo J. Rodriguez−Melendez, pro−se. (np) (Entered: 04/13/2011)

9900 Invoice number 5/11 in the amount of $76,472.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred during the month of March 2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits) (ni) (Entered: 04/13/2011)

9899 ORDER noted 9893 Motion In Compliance; granting 9893 Motion for extension of time Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 04/13/2011. (mt) (Entered: 04/13/2011)

9901 Second INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Defendants' Initiatives filed by Esther Crespin−Credi on behalf of All Defendants (Crespin−Credi, Esther) (Entered: 04/14/2011)

9902

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9895 Invoice number 3/11 in the amount of $76,767.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc. for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of January 2011. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/13/11.(su) (Entered: 04/14/2011)

9903

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds 9896 Invoice number 4/11 in the amount of $83,204.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc. for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of February 2011. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/13/11.(su) (Entered: 04/14/2011)

9904 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds Re: 9900 Invoice number 5/11 in the amount of $76,472.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd. for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred during the month of March 2011. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/14/11.(su) (Entered: 04/14/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 454 of 513

04/15/2011
04/28/2011 04/28/2011 05/02/2011 05/09/2011 05/10/2011 05/10/2011
05/10/2011 05/10/2011
05/10/2011 05/10/2011 05/12/2011 05/18/2011 05/18/2011

9905

Motion In Compliance with December 2, 2010 Order at Docket 9862 as to Food Services filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Food Services Manual, # 2 Exhibit Food Services Manual, # 3 Exhibit Recruitment of Personnel, # 4 Exhibit Job Postings "Convocatorias", # 5 Exhibit Certification of Eligible Personnel, # 6 Exhibit Certification of Eligible Personnel)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 04/15/2011)

9906 ORDER Approving the Correctional Health Services Corporation Transfer of Funds for the Operational Budget for the Third Quarter of Fiscal Year 2010−2011 to the Correctional Health Services Corporation. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/27/2011.(cm) (Entered: 04/28/2011)

9907 The Court ORDERS that the Medical and Mental Health Care plan be amended as proposed. CHSC is directed to provide a final copy of the amended MMHCP to all parties to this lititgation and to the Court. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 4/27/2011.(cm) (Entered: 04/28/2011)

9908 ORDER : Status Conference set for 5/18/2011 at 04:00 PM in PG's Chambers (Old San Juan) before Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez.Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/2/2011.(ja) (Entered: 05/02/2011)

9909 ORDER OF RECUSAL: for the reasons explained herein, the undersigned shall not continue to preside the instant case. Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez recused. Signed by Judge Juan M Perez−Gimenez on 5/9/2011.(PMA) (Entered: 05/09/2011)

9910 ORDER: DESIGNATION OF DISTRICT JUDGE FOR SERVICE IN ANOTHER DISTRICT WITHIN THIS CIRCUIT BY Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Sandra L. Lynch. Signed by Clerk on 5/10/2011.(be) (Entered: 05/10/2011)

9911

MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: Pursuant to Order entered on 5/10/2011 (Docket 9910), by Chief Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, Sandra L. Lynch, this case has been assigned to Hon. Paul J. Barbadoro. All future pleadings shall bear the following initials next to the case number: CIVIL CASE NO. 79−4 (PJB).Signed by Clerk on 5/10/2011.(be) (Entered: 05/10/2011)

9912 MOTION requesting Order regarding MAY 18TH STATUS CONFERENCE filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 05/10/2011)

9913

Invoice number 34408 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of January 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with Case 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, including system maintenance. (cm) (Entered: 05/10/2011)

9914 MOTION for Joinder filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 05/10/2011)

9915 Invoice number 6/11 in the amount of $72,152.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of April 2011. (cm) (Entered: 05/11/2011)

9916 NOTICE OF VIDEO−STATUS CONFERENCE: set for 5/19/2011 11:00 AM in Courtroom (5), Hato Rey Courthouse before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.Signed by Clerk on 5/12/2011.(cm) (Entered: 05/12/2011)

9917 ORDER denying as moot 9912 Motion requesting Order regarding MAY 18TH STATUS CONFERENCE; denying as moot 9914 Motion for Joinder. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/18/11. (ft) (Entered: 05/18/2011)

9918

Motion for Contempt OF COURT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE STIPULATIONS REGARDING CLASSIFICATION AND STAFFING AND THE COURT'S 26 JANUARY 1995 ORDER filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/3/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter from Guillermo J Ramos Luina to the Defendants, # 2 Exhibit Ltr from Defendants to Plaintiffs)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 05/18/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 455 of 513

05/19/2011 05/21/2011 05/25/2011
05/26/2011
05/31/2011 06/17/2011 06/17/2011 06/20/2011 06/21/2011 06/23/2011
06/30/2011 07/01/2011 07/01/2011

9919 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Video Status Conference held on 5/19/2011. (Court Reporter Barbara Dachman.) (Attachments: # 1 Attendance List) (ft) (Entered: 05/20/2011)

9920 Joint INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Compliance in the Area of Visitation filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/21/2011)

9921

Transcript of Videoconferenced Status Conference Proceedings held on 05/19/2011, before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Court Reporter/Transcriber Barbara Dachman, Telephone number 787−722−0132. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter or PACER. Redaction Request due 6/16/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/27/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/25/2011. (bd) (Entered: 05/25/2011)

9922

Motion In Compliance with order regarding Curnyn Consulting filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Docket 6177, # 2 Exhibit Docket 6219, # 3 Exhibit Memorandum by Curnyn Consulting, # 4 Exhibit CV Garvey, # 5 Exhibit CV Vaughan, # 6 Exhibit CV Rivera−Vandermyde)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/26/2011)

9923 ORDER noted 9920 INFORMATIVE motion. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/31/2011. (cm) (Entered: 05/31/2011)

9924 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/17/2011)

9925 Joint MOTION Submitting THE NEW INMATES CLASSIFICATION MANUAL FOR THE COURTS APPROVAL filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Inmates' Classification Manual)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 06/17/2011)

9926 Motion In Compliance filed by Angel E. Rotger−Sabat on behalf of Correctional Health Services Corporation (Rotger−Sabat, Angel) (Entered: 06/20/2011)

9927 Invoice number 7/11 in the amount of $61,515.00 payable to Curnyn Consulting, Inc., for professional services rendered and personal expenses incurred relative to the Stipulation during the month of May 2011. (cm) (Entered: 06/23/2011)

9928

MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for the Operation of the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 CAEC External Auditors' Financial Statements, June 30, 2010)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 06/23/2011)

9929 ORDER granting 9925 Motion submitting THE NEW INMATES CLASSIFICATION MANUAL FOR THE COURTS APPROVAL. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/30/11. (ft) (Entered: 06/30/2011)

9930 Emergency MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/01/2011)

9931

ORDER denying 9930 Motion for Disbursement of Funds As I explained when I directed counsel to file a memorandum addressing the fee issue, I required counsel to file the memorandum 30 days in advance of submitting any request for payment of fees. Counsel has failed to comply with this request. Motion denied. The clerk shall set a video conference with the parties to discuss the fee issue. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/1/11. (mmi) (Entered: 07/05/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 456 of 513

07/05/2011
07/05/2011 07/05/2011 07/06/2011
07/06/2011
07/06/2011
07/06/2011 07/07/2011 07/07/2011 07/07/2011 07/12/2011 07/12/2011 07/13/2011
07/15/2011

9933

ORDER: The Court will hold a Video Conference on Thursday, July 7, 2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 5 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. The purpose of this Video Conference is to discuss the Correctional Health Services for the first 1/2 hour and then the fees issue for the second 1/2 hour. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/5/11.(ft) (Entered: 07/05/2011)

9934 Joint Motion In Compliance with Order at Docket 9919 filed by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Lausell−Recurt, Steven) (Entered: 07/05/2011)

Attachments referred to in DE 9934 bounded and marked as Volumes 1, 2 and 3 filed conventionally in Clerk's Office due to large volume. A courtesy copy via FedEx will be sent by the court to Judge Paul J. Barbadoro at New Hampshire U.S. Courthouse. (cm) Modified on 7/7/2011 to edit text (cm). (Entered: 07/05/2011)

9935

**FILED IN ERROR−PDF ERROR** MOTION requesting Order AUTHORIZING USE OF FINE FUNDS FOR PAYMENT OF EXPERT IN CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Curriculum Vitae)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) Modified on 7/6/2011 as requested by filer (cm). (Entered: 07/06/2011)

9936

Supplemental Motion to the Report Setting Out Legal Authority for a Judge's Use of Fine Funds re: 9924 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order to Disburse Funds to the CAEC, dkt. 7710)(Related document(s) 9924 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/06/2011)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 9935 MOTION requesting Order AUTHORIZING USE OF FINE FUNDS FOR PAYMENT OF EXPERT IN CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES. Marekd as **FILED IN ERROR DUE TO PDF ERROR **. As requested by filer, counsel to re−file. (cm) (Entered: 07/06/2011)

9937 MOTION requesting Order Authorizing Use of fine Funds for Payment of Expert in Classification of Inmates filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/06/2011)

9938 ORDER denying without prejudice for the parties to refile as a joint proposal as outlined by the court 9937 Motion requesting Order Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/7/11. (mmi) (Entered: 07/07/2011)

9939 ORDER denying wihtout prejudice 9928 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/7/11. (mmi) (Entered: 07/07/2011)

9942 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Video Conference held on 7/7/2011. Motions due by 8/7/2011.(Court Reporter Amy Walker.) (Attachments: # 1 Attendance Lists) (ft) (Entered: 07/13/2011)

9941 Motion In Compliance filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/12/2011)

DEPOSIT of Funds in the amount of $SEALED, receipt number PRX100006691, in compliance with docket number 9940. Deposited in an Interest Bearing Account in compliance with L.R.67. Funds will be available for disbursement after 07/21/2011. (ne) Modified on 7/13/2011 to edit text (cm). (Entered: 07/13/2011)

9943

MEMORANDUM in Support of Request for Funding of the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation Re: 9924 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Order, Dkt. 7710, # 2 Exhibit Order, Dkt. 9813)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/13/2011)

9944 ORDER re 9943 Memorandum in support, filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/15/11.(mmi) (Entered: 07/15/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 457 of 513

07/15/2011 07/19/2011
07/19/2011 07/19/2011 07/19/2011 07/19/2011 07/21/2011
07/22/2011 07/22/2011 07/26/2011 07/26/2011 07/27/2011

9945 ORDER re 9932 Invoice by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/15/11.(mmi) (Entered: 07/15/2011)

9946

Transcript of Video Conference held on 07/07/11, before Honorable District Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Court Reporter/Transcriber Amy Walker, Telephone number 787−772−3470, prcsr123@gmail.com. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Redaction Request due 8/11/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/19/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/17/2011. (aw) . (Entered: 07/19/2011)

9947 ORDER setting Video Conference re 9945 Order for 7/26/2011 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/19/11.(ft) (Entered: 07/19/2011)

9948

***FILED IN ERROR−ATTORNEY SUBMITTED WRONG DOCUMENT (DRAFT OF THE MOTION)***MOTION for Reconsideration re 9944 Order filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/4/2011 (Related document(s) 9944 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) Modified on 7/19/2011 (ft). (Entered: 07/19/2011)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 9948 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9944 Order ***FILED IN ERROR−ATTORNEY SUBMITTED WRONG DOCUMENT (DRAFT OF MOTION)*** (ft) (Entered: 07/19/2011)

9949 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9944 Order filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/4/2011 (Related document(s) 9944 ) (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 07/19/2011)

9950

ORDER denying 9949 Motion for Reconsideration re 9944 Order. I cannot reimburse plaintiffs for expenditures that they have incurred without documentation that the expenditures were incurred pursuant to the approved budget and are otherwise appropriate. The court will seek an audit on an expedited basis and will approve the expenses as soon as they are properly documented. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/21/11. (ft) (Entered: 07/21/2011)

9951 ORDER re 9943 Memorandum in support, filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation. The Corporation shall provide documentation concerning the fiscal year in question for in camera review by the court and an accountant. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/22/11.(mmi) (Entered: 07/22/2011)

9952 Joint MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Attachment A Budget for the First Quarter of the Fiscal Year 2011−2012)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/22/2011)

9953 ORDER granting 9952 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Status Report due by 8/26/2011. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/26/11. (mmi) (Entered: 07/26/2011)

9954 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Video Conference held on 7/26/2011. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 7/28/2011. Joint Filing due by 8/9/2011. (Court Reporter Diane Breaz.) (sr) (Entered: 07/27/2011)

9955

ORDER denying 9841 INFORMATIVE motion; denying 9853 Motion In Compliance; denying 9854 Motion for Judgment; denying 9854 Motion to Dismiss; denying 9864 Motion for Leave to File; denying 9866 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 9868 Motion submitting ; denying 9871 INFORMATIVE motion; denying 9874 Motion for Leave to File; denying 9879 INFORMATIVE motion; denying 9891 INFORMATIVE motion; denying 9897 INFORMATIVE motion; denying 9898 Motion requesting Order; denying 9901 INFORMATIVE motion; denying

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 458 of 513

07/28/2011 07/29/2011 08/01/2011 08/02/2011 08/02/2011
08/05/2011 08/15/2011 08/16/2011 08/16/2011
08/16/2011 08/16/2011

9905 Motion In Compliance Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/27/11. (mmi) (Entered: 07/27/2011)

9956 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order, Dkt. 9951 filed by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Lausell−Recurt, Steven) (Entered: 07/28/2011)

9957 Joint INFORMATIVE Motion regarding HOGAR SANTSIMA TRINIDAD filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/29/2011)

9958 ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds in the amount of $350,000.00 payable to the Civil Action and Education Corporation from the fine funds as an advance on the funds it is seeking pursuant to the previously approved budget. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/1/2011.(cm) (Entered: 08/01/2011)

9959 MOTION Submitting Contract with Cunrnyn Consulting, Ltd. filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/02/2011)

9960

Transcript of Video Conference Hearing held on July 26, 2011, before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Court Reporter/Transcriber Diane Breaz, Telephone number 787−781−1154. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Redaction Request due 8/25/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 9/2/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/31/2011. (db) (Entered: 08/02/2011)

9961 Joint Motion In Compliance with Order dated July 7, 2011 at Docket 9954 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/05/2011)

9962 ORDER denying without prejudice re 9928 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for the Operation of the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/15/11.(mmi) (Entered: 08/15/2011)

9963

ORDER denying as moot re 9926 Motion In Compliance filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation, 9922 Motion In Compliance with order regarding Curnyn Consulting filed by parties 9941 Motion In Compliance filed by parties 9957 Joint INFORMATIVE Motion regarding HOGAR SANTSIMA TRINIDAD filed by the parties 9934 Joint Motion in Compliance with order at 9919 filed by the parties Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/16/11.(mmi) (Entered: 08/16/2011)

9964

ORDER denying re 9956 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order, Dkt. 9951 filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation, 9943 Memorandum in support, filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation, 9936 Supplemental Motion to the Report Setting Out Legal Authority for a Judge's Use of Fine Funds re: 9924 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order Supplemental Motion to the Report Setting Out Legal Authority for a Judge's Use of Fine Funds re: 9924 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation, 9924 Motion In Compliance with Court's Order filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/16/11.(mmi) (Entered: 08/16/2011)

9965 ORDER re: services of construction consultant Response to ORDER Deadline due by 8/31/2011.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/16/11. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Scope of Work)(mmi) (Entered: 08/16/2011)

9966 ORDER taking under advisement 9959 Motion submitting Contract with Curnyn Consulting The clerk shall set a video conference hearing to consider the motion. A representative from Curnyn shall be present and shall be prepared to testify Signed

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 459 of 513

08/16/2011
08/16/2011 08/16/2011 08/17/2011
08/17/2011
08/17/2011 08/18/2011
08/18/2011 08/24/2011
08/26/2011
08/26/2011 08/29/2011

by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/16/11. (mmi) (Entered: 08/17/2011)

9968

ORDER re 9934 Joint Motion In Compliance with Order at Docket 9919 The parties shall meet and confer and agree on a plan for the resolution of all remaining issues within the next 12 months. The plan shall identify all remaining issues and propose a hearing schedule for the resolution of said issues. The plan shall be filed on or before September 9, 2011. Status Report due by 9/9/2011.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/16/11.(mmi) (Entered: 08/17/2011)

9970 PROCEDURAL ORDERSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/16/11.(mmi) (Entered: 08/17/2011)

9971 ORDER Order numbers 3575 and 4494 are vacatedSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/16/11.(mmi) (Entered: 08/17/2011)

9967

NOTICE of Filing Proposed Order re: 9913 Invoice number 34408 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of January 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with Case 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, including system maintenance. (cm) (Entered: 08/17/2011)

9969

Invoice number 35828 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of April 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, including system maintenance. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 08/17/2011)

9972 ORDER re 9932 Invoice from Hogar Catolico Santisma Trinidad, Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/17/11.(mmi) (Entered: 08/17/2011)

9973

ORDER The proposed order shall issue. The Clerk shall inform RSM ROC & Company that no further services shall be performed in connection with this matter without prior court approval, re 9969 Invoice number 35828 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of April 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, including system maintenance. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/18/2011.(cm) (Entered: 08/18/2011)

9974 ORDER setting Video Conference Hearing re 9959 Motion submitting Contract with Curnyn Consulting set for 9/13/2011 10:00 AM before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/18/11.(ft) (Entered: 08/18/2011)

9975

Invoice number 35848 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company, for professional services rendered during the month of August 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transaction of funds related with Case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, including system maintenance. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order) (cm) (Entered: 08/24/2011)

9976

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9969 Invoice number 35828 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of April 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, including system maintenance. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/18/2011.(cm) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

9977 Joint MOTION Submitting Status Report Regarding Health Services, Motion In Compliance with Order Dated July 26, 2011 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 08/26/2011)

9978 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 460 of 513

08/30/2011 08/31/2011
08/31/2011
09/06/2011 09/07/2011 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 09/08/2011 09/09/2011 09/13/2011
09/13/2011 09/19/2011
09/20/2011 09/21/2011

Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 08/29/2011)

9979 ORDER approving re 9975 Invoice, 9913 Invoice, Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 08/30/2011.(mmi) (Entered: 08/30/2011)

9980

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9913 Invoice number 34408 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company for professional services rendered during the month of January 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transactions of funds related with Case 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended December 31, 2010, including system maintenance. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/30/2011.(cm) (Entered: 08/31/2011)

9981

ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: 9975 Invoice number 35848 in the amount of $3,500.00 payable to RSM ROC & Company, for professional services rendered during the month of August 2011, in connection with the accounting for the transaction of funds related with Case No. 79−4, covering the transactions for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, including system maintenance. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/30/2011.(cm) (Entered: 08/31/2011)

9982 REPORT by Civil Action and Education Corporation. (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 09/06/2011)

9983 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for Health Services filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 09/07/2011)

9984 **FILED IN ERROR−WRONG EVENT**Joint Motion In Compliance Status Report in Compliance with Order at Docket 9968 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 9/9/2011 (cm). (Entered: 09/08/2011)

9985 ORDER: The Video Conference set for 9/13/2011 10:00 AM re: 9959 MOTION Submitting Contract with Cunrnyn Consulting, Ltd. will be held in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/7/2011.(ct) (Entered: 09/08/2011)

9986 STATUS REPORT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ORDER AT DOCKET 9968 by All Plaintiffs, Defendant−All. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 09/08/2011)

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk re: 9984 Joint Motion In Compliance Status Report in Compliance with Order at Docket 9968.**Marked as Filed in Error−Wrong Event**, See 9986 for correct entry. (cm) (Entered: 09/09/2011)

9987

Minute Order. Proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Video Conference held on 9/13/2011. Re: [ 9959 MOTION Submitting Contract with Cunrnyn Consulting, Ltd. filed by defendants AND 9978 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds to Finance the Civil Action and Education Corporation filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation. (Court Reporter Barbara Dachman.)Hearing set for 10:00.Hearing held at 10:18.Hearing ended at 12:00. (ct) (Entered: 09/13/2011)

9988 ORDER granting 9978 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/13/11. (mmi) (Entered: 09/13/2011)

9989

ORDER re> case management, Set Deadlines Trial plan for the litigation of damage claims Deadline due by 12/19/2011. Response to Status report re: defendants' noncompliance with court orders and stipulations Deadline due by 11/17/2011. Status Report due by 11/3/2011 re: pending constitutional claims for injunctive relief and defendants' noncompliance with court orders and stipulations.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/19/11.(mmi) (Entered: 09/20/2011)

9990 ORDER denying without prejudice 9959 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/20/11. (mmi) (Entered: 09/20/2011)

9991 Transcript of Videoconferenced Motion Hearing Proceedings held on 09/13/2011, before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Court Reporter/Transcriber Barbara Dachman,

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 461 of 513

Telephone number 787−722−0132. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter or PACER. Redaction Request due 10/14/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 10/24/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 12/22/2011. (bd) (Entered: 09/21/2011)

09/27/2011

9992 Motion In Compliance with Court Order dated 13 September 2011 (Dkt. 9988) filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

09/27/2011 9993 MOTION for extension of time filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Carlos Morales−Feliciano Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/14/2011 (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 09/27/2011)

10/03/2011

9994 MOTION for Reconsideration re 9989 Order, Set Deadlines,, filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/20/2011 (Related document(s) 9989 ) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 10/03/2011)

10/04/2011 9995 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad covering the months of July, August and September 2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (cm) (Entered: 10/04/2011)

10/07/2011

9996 ORDER re 9983 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for Health Services filed by the parties, Set Hearings VIDEO Status Conference set for 10/11/2011 10:00 AM before Judge Paul J Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/7/11.(mmi) (Entered: 10/07/2011)

10/07/2011 9997 Minute Entry: The VIDEO Status Conference set for 10/11/2011 10:00 AM will be held in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 10/07/2011)

10/07/2011 9998 ORDER Reminder of proper way to file status reportsSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/7/11.(mmi) (Entered: 10/07/2011)

10/11/2011 9999 ORAL MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation. (ct) (Entered: 10/11/2011)

10/11/2011

10000

Minute of Proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Video Status Conference held on 10/11/2011. Re: (9983) Motion for Disbursement of Funds; (9992) Motion In Compliance; (9993) Motion for extension of time. Taking under advisement (9999) ORAL Motion to Withdraw as Attorney submitted by Attorney Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez. Status Report re: hospital construction due within 14 days. Status Report due by 10/25/2011. (Court Reporter Amy Walker.)Hearing set for 10:00.Hearing held at 10:05.Hearing ended at 12:25. (ct) (Entered: 10/11/2011)

10/11/2011 10001 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds OF FINE FUNDS FOR HEALTH SERVICES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 10/11/2011)

10/12/2011 10002 NOTICE REGARDING AGREEMENT FOR TERMINATION RELATED TO THE CONSOLIDATED CASE MONTERO TORRES AND ISSUES PERTAINING TO THE PAROLE BOARD by All Parties (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 10/12/2011)

10/13/2011

10003

ORDER granting 10001 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Granted. The request is approved. The clerk shall disburse $4,382,785 from the fine funds to the Correctional Health Services Corporation to cover anticipated expenditures during the second quarter of the current fiscal year. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/13/11. (mmi) (Entered: 10/13/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 462 of 513

10/13/2011 10004 ORDER denying 9993 Motion for extension of time Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/13/11. (mmi) (Entered: 10/14/2011)

10/13/2011 10005 ORDER denying 9994 Motion for Reconsideration Motion denied. I will determine whether to allocate time for settlement discussions after the parties comply with my September 19, 2011 Order. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/13/11. (mmi) (Entered: 10/14/2011)

10/14/2011 10006 ORDER denying 9983 Motion for Disbursement of Funds The motion is denied as moot in light of the court's October 13, 2011 order granting the motion for disbursement of funds (Doc. no. 10001) Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/14/11. (mmi) (Entered: 10/14/2011)

10/14/2011

10007

ORDER re 9992 Motion In Compliance with Court Order dated 13 September 2011 (Dkt. 9988) Motion In Compliance with Court Order dated 13 September 2011 (Dkt. 9988) filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation On or before October 28, 2011 the Corporation shall submit a proposed rate schedule for all attorneys who will be submitting bills for payment. On or before October 28, 2011 the Corporation shall file under seal a proposed litigation budgetSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/14/11.(mmi) (Entered: 10/14/2011)

10/14/2011 10008 ORDER approving re 9995 Report filed by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad Before January 5, 2012, Hogar shall submit an expense report detailing how the funds advanced pursuant to this Order have been used.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/14/11.(mmi) (Entered: 10/14/2011)

10/17/2011 10009 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Exhibit)(Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 10/17/2011)

10/19/2011 10010 ORDER denying 10009 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/19/11. (mmi) (Entered: 10/20/2011)

10/24/2011 10011 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding the Civil Action and Education Corporation Financial Situation filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Civil Action and Education Corporation (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) (Entered: 10/24/2011)

10/25/2011

10012

ORDER re 10011 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding the Civil Action and Education Corporation Financial Situation filed by Civil Action and Education Corporation A Video conference will be held on Friday, October 28, 2011, at 3:00 pmSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/25/11.(mmi) (Entered: 10/25/2011)

10/25/2011 10013 MOTION FOR RESCHEDULING OF HEARING by All Defendants re 10012 Order, (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) Modified on 10/26/2011 to edit event type (cm). (Entered: 10/25/2011)

10/26/2011

10014

MOTION for Joinder Re: 10013 Notice (Other) filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Related document(s) 10013 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 10/26/2011)

10/26/2011 10015 ORDER granting 10013 Motion to Continue The motion is granted. The video conference is rescheduled to Thursday, 11/3/11 at 2:30 pm. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/26/11. (mmi) (Entered: 10/26/2011)

10/26/2011 10016 Minute Entry. The VIDEO Conference set for 11/03/2011 2:30 PM will be held in Courtroom 5 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. (gsr) (Entered: 10/26/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 463 of 513

10/26/2011 10017 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**CERTIFIED ACCOUNT REPORT. (cm) (Entered: 10/26/2011)

10/28/2011

10018

Motion In Compliance with October 14, 2011 Order filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Statement by Rodriguez Vidal, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Statement by Anduze Montano, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Opinion and order in Civil No. 99−1457, # 4 Exhibit 4 − Ramos Luina CV, # 5 Exhibit 5 − Rodriguez Rivera CV, # 6 Exhibit 6 − Miranda Rodriguez CV, # 7 Exhibit 7 − Roque Velazquez CV, # 8 Exhibit 8 − Arraiza Navas CV, # 9 Exhibit 9 − Olmo Rios CV, # 10 Exhibit 10 − Diaz Ramirez CV, # 11 Exhibit 11 − Lausell Recurt CV, # 12 Exhibit 12 − Padilla Rodriguez CV)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 10/28/2011)

11/03/2011 10019 Minute Entry: The Video Conference set for today at 2:30 PM will be held in Courtroom 7 before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (dv) (Entered: 11/03/2011)

11/03/2011 10021 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Status Conference held on 11/3/2011. After receiving the pending reports, the Court will set a Chamber's Conference for an in−person meeting. (Court Reporter Amy Walker.) (dv) (Entered: 11/04/2011)

11/04/2011 10020 ORDER Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 11/4/11. (Attachments: # 1 Time Sheet)(mmi) (Entered: 11/04/2011)

11/07/2011 10022 STATUS REPORT REGARDING PENDING CONSTITUTIONAL CLAIMS FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 11/07/2011)

11/07/2011 10023 STATUS REPORT REGARDING DEFENDANTS NONCOMPLIANCE WITH COURT ORDERS AND STIPULATIONS by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 11/07/2011)

11/08/2011 10024 NOTICE Report on Correctional Medical Center by Correctional Health Services Corporation (Quilichini−Garcia, Manuel) (Entered: 11/08/2011)

11/14/2011

10025

MOTION for Reconsideration (Partial) re 10020 Order filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/1/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − March 18, 2010 Statement by the Hon. Julia Gibbons before the House of Representatives Committee)(Related document(s) 10020 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 11/14/2011)

11/18/2011

10026

NOTICE Regarding Curnyn by All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Memorandum, # 2 Appendix Appendix 1, # 3 Appendix Appendix 2, # 4 Appendix Appendix 3, # 5 Appendix Apppendix 4, # 6 Appendix Appendix 5, # 7 Appendix Appendix 6, # 8 Appendix Appendix 7, # 9 Appendix Appendix 8, # 10 Appendix Appendix 9, # 11 Appendix Appendix 10, # 12 Appendix Appendix 11, # 13 Appendix Appendix 12, # 14 Appendix Appendix 13, # 15 Appendix Appendix 13A, # 16 Appendix Appendix 13B, # 17 Appendix Appendix 13C, # 18 Appendix Appendix 14, # 19 Appendix Appendix 15, # 20 Appendix Appendix 16, # 21 Appendix Appendix 17, # 22 Appendix Appendix 18, # 23 Appendix Appendix 19, # 24 Appendix Appendix 20, # 25 Appendix Appendix 21, # 26 Appendix Addendum) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Additional attachment(s) added on 1/13/2012: # 27 Certified Translation Exhibit 18) . Modified on 2/23/2012 to remove docket entry restriction per order DE# 10080 . (cm). (Entered: 11/18/2011)

11/18/2011 10027 SCHEDULING ORDER, Status Report due by 12/7/2011 re: resolution of all remaining issues. Status Conference set for 12/9/2011 09:00 AM before Judge Paul J Barbadoro in Puerto Rico.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 11/18/11.(mmi) (Entered: 11/18/2011)

11/20/2011 10028 REPORT ON PENDING ISSUES AND REQUEST FOR TERMINATION UNDER PLRA by All Defendants. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 11/21/2011 to link it to documents 10022 and 10023(mmi). (Entered: 11/20/2011)

12/05/2011 10029 Minute Entry: The Status Conference set for 12/9/2011 09:00 AM in will be held in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 12/05/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 464 of 513

12/07/2011 10030 REPORT ON THE SCHEDULING FOR THE RESOLUTION OF ALL REMAINING ISSUES by All Parties. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/07/2011)

12/08/2011

10031

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion to Terminate filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10028 Report filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 12/08/2011)

12/09/2011 10032 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Status Conference held on 12/9/2011. Status Report re: uncollected fines due by 12/19/2011. Advise Court of Settlement Deadline due by 3/1/2012. (Court Reporter Yvette Richardson.) (ct) (Entered: 12/12/2011)

12/09/2011 10033 LETTER/MOTION requesting an extension of another year of service, filed by Padre Pedro Gorena of Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad, Pro Se. (ni) (Entered: 12/12/2011)

12/14/2011 10034 STATUS REPORT filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez on behalf of Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez (Garcia−Gutierrez, Carlos) Modified on 12/14/2011 (mmi). (Entered: 12/14/2011)

12/14/2011 10035 ORDER Judge Charles Cordero is appointed as settlement master. The case is stayed until 3/1/12. Status reports due every 2 weeks.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/14/11.(mmi) (Entered: 12/14/2011)

12/14/2011 10036 ORDER, Set Deadlines Sealed Status Report due by 1/13/2012 re: accounts being used to hold funds.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/14/11.(mmi) (Entered: 12/14/2011)

12/15/2011 10037 ***EX−PARTE***REPORT REGARDING THE CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CENTER by All Defendants. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/15/2011)

12/16/2011 10038 ***EX−PARTE***REPORT Regarding Uncollected Fines by All Defendants. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/16/2011)

12/23/2011

10039

MOTION SUBMITTING FOR APPROVAL CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION by All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CHSC Contract and Attachments) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 12/27/2011 to edit event type (cm). (Entered: 12/23/2011)

12/26/2011 10040 REPORT ON THE SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS by All Parties. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/26/2011)

12/28/2011 10041 NOTICE REGARDING EXTENSION OF CONTRACT WITH CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION by All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/28/2011)

12/28/2011 10042 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10025 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/28/2011. (cm) (Entered: 12/28/2011)

12/28/2011 10043 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re (10038) Report filed by All Defendants NOTED. The funds referenced in document number 10038 shall not be used encumbered or transferred without prior approval of the court. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/28/2011.(cm) (Entered: 12/28/2011)

12/28/2011

10044

ORDER re 10034 STATUS REPORT filed by Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez, The clerk shall set a video conference. To discuss the recent bankruptcy filing by the Civil Action and Education Corporation. Counsel for the plaintiffs, the defendants, and the trustee shall attend..Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/28/2011.(cm) (Entered: 12/28/2011)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 465 of 513

12/29/2011 10045 Minute Entry: Video Conference set for 1/9/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 12/29/2011)

12/29/2011 10046 ORDER re: Videoconference hearing on the proposed contract between the defendants and the Correctional Health Services Corp. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/29/2011.(cm) (Entered: 12/29/2011)

12/30/2011

10047

Minute Entry: As per Order 10046 , a Video Conference re: Correctional Services' contract is set for 1/9/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. The Video Conference re: bankruptcy proceedings is hereby reset for 1/9/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 12/30/2011)

12/30/2011 10048 REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester Covering the Months of October, November and December 2011. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A) (cm) (Entered: 01/03/2012)

01/03/2012 10049 Minute Entry: Set Hearings The 1st Video Conference is hereby reset for 1/9/2012 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. The 2nd Video Conference is hereby reset for 1/9/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 01/03/2012)

01/05/2012 10050 Minute Entry: The Video Conferences set for 1/9/2012 will be held in Courtroom #2. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 01/05/2012)

01/06/2012 10051 ***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Transition and Litigation Plan filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Office space quotation, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Moving quotation, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Litigation plan)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/06/2012)

01/06/2012

10052

RESPONSE to Motion Submitting CHSC Contract for Court Approval filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10039 MOTION Submitting filed by Johnny Rullan, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Lorenzo Villalba, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Johnny Colon, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Nestor Galarza, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Carmen Feliciano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Isabel Suliveres, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/06/2012)

01/08/2012 10053 REPORT on Settlement Negotiations by All Parties. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 01/08/2012)

01/09/2012

10054

ORDER: Assignment of Magistrate Judge Landya Boyer McCafferty from the District of New Hampshire to perform all duties authorized within 28 U.S.C. § 636(a)−(c) for the duration of this case. So Ordered. Signed by Chief Judge Aida M. Delgado−Colon, and Chief Judge N. Laplante on 1/9/2012.(cm) (Entered: 01/09/2012)

01/09/2012 10055 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: Pursuant to the Order issued by Chief Judge Aida M. Delgado Colon and Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante on 1/9/12, docket entry #10054, this case is hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. Signed by Clerk on 1/9/12. (li) (Entered: 01/09/2012)

01/09/2012 10056 ORDER referring Curnyn matters re 9959 MOTION Submitting Contract to the Magistrate Judge. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/9/12.(mmi) Modified on 1/9/2012 to add wording and remove names (mmi). (Entered: 01/09/2012)

01/09/2012

10057

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro:Status Conference held on 1/9/2012. Modified contract and proposed budget due as soon as possible. Objections to proposed budget due within 7 days after its filing. Staffing plan for the hospital due within next 90 days.(Court Reporter Vicky Eastvold.) (gsr) (Entered: 01/10/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 466 of 513

01/11/2012

10058

MOTION SUBMITTING CHSCS BUDGET REQUEST FOR THE THIRD AND FOURTH QUARTER OF FISCAL YEAR 2011−2012 by All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CHSC's Budget Proposal for Third and Fourth Quarter of Fiscal Year 2011−2012) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 1/12/2012 to edit event type(cm). (Entered: 01/11/2012)

01/11/2012

10059

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting First Set of Invoices by Plaintiffs Counsel filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Invoices by Rafael Rodriguez Rivera, # 3 Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodirguez, # 4 Invoices by Jose Rafael Roque Velazquez, # 5 Invoices by Ivonne Olmo Rios, # 6 Invoices by Fermin Arraiza Navas, # 7 Invoices by Melba Daz Ramrez, # 8 Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 9 Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodriguez)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/11/2012)

01/17/2012

10060

Transcript of Status Conference held on 1/9/2012, before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Court Reporter Vicki Eastvold, Telephone number 787−772−3478. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Redaction Request due 2/9/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 2/17/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 4/16/2012. (Eastvold, Vicki) (Entered: 01/17/2012)

01/18/2012 10061 ORDER re 10048 Report filed by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad, Clerk is to disburse funds. Status Report due by 4/5/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/18/12.(mmi) Modified on 1/20/2012 to correct the date the status report is due(mmi). (Entered: 01/18/2012)

01/18/2012 10062 ORDER The Commonwealth is relieved of its obligation under the court's prior order to pay interest on the transferred fine funds.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/18/12.(mmi) (Entered: 01/19/2012)

01/20/2012 10063 ENDORSED ORDER I refer all (plaintiffs') fee requests to the Magistrate Judge for resolutionSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/20/12.(mmi) (Entered: 01/23/2012)

01/31/2012 10064 ORDER Parties to review request for proposal, Response to Proposal Deadline due by 2/14/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/31/12. (Attachments: **CASE PARTICIPANTS**# 1 Request for Proposal)(mmi) Modified on 1/31/2012 to edit text (cm). (Entered: 01/31/2012)

02/01/2012 10065 STATUS REPORT ON THE SETTLEMENT NEGOTIATIONS by All Plaintiffs, Defendant−All. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 02/01/2012)

02/03/2012 10066 ORDER re 10026 Notice filed by All defendants Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/2/12. (Attachments:**SELECTED PARTIES** # 1 Attachment)(mmi) (Entered: 02/03/2012)

02/03/2012 10067 Minute Entry: Video Conference set for 2/23/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 02/03/2012)

02/09/2012 10068 REPORT Plan for the Presevation, Return and/or Disposition of Files of Individual Class Members by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − CV for Julia Primero Miranda) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/09/2012)

02/10/2012 10069 MOTION Requesting that Plaintiff Class Lead Counsel Be Excused from February 23rd Video Conference and/or that It Be Reset for 2:00 PM AST re 10067 Minute, Set Hearings filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Related document(s) 10067 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/10/2012)

02/10/2012 10070 ORDER granting 10069 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Plaintiff Class Lead Counsel is excused from attendance at the February 23, 2012, video conference. Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/10/12. (mmi) (Entered: 02/10/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 467 of 513

02/10/2012 10071 STATUS REPORT REGARDING THE NEGOTIATIONS FOR THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND CORRECTIONAL HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION by Defendant−All. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 02/10/2012)

02/11/2012

10072

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting January 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Guillermo Ramos Luia's Invoice, # 2 Appendix 2 − Rafael Rodriguez Rivera's Invoices, # 3 Appendix 3 − Lillian Miranda's Invoices, # 4 Appendix 4 − Ivonne Olmos's Invoices, # 5 Appendix 5 − Fermin Aarraiza Navas' Invoices, # 6 Appendix 6 − Meba Diaz's Invoices, # 7 Appendix 7 − Jose Roque Velazquez's Invoices, # 8 Appendix 8 − Sreven Lausell Recurt's Invoices, # 9 Appendix 9 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodriguez)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/11/2012)

02/13/2012 10073 Minute Entry: Video Conference set for 2/23/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 4 before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 02/13/2012)

02/14/2012 10074 ORDER : A Video Conference is hereby set for 2/27/2012 11:30 AM in Courtroom 2 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro re: 10068 Report filed by All Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/14/2012.(ct) (Entered: 02/14/2012)

02/14/2012 10075 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10064 Order,, Set Deadlines, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/14/2012)

02/15/2012 10076 ORDER approving proposal for consulting services submitted by Dewberry Architects, Inc., in Docket# 10064 . Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/15/2012.(cm) (Entered: 02/15/2012)

02/16/2012

10077

MOTION requesting Order for the Approval of an Expert in the in the Area of Classification of Inmates filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Curriculum vitae, # 2 Exhibit Proposed Professionl Services Agreement, # 3 Exhibit Scope of Services)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 02/16/2012)

02/16/2012

10078

REPORT REGARDING CURNYN CONSULTING, LTD. by All Defendants. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Work performed for the Government Defendants, # 2 Exhibit Work performed for CHSC) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 2/23/2012 to remove docket entry restriction per order DE# 10080 . (cm). (Entered: 02/16/2012)

02/17/2012

10079

***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10072 MOTION Submitting January 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs, 10059 MOTION Submitting First Set of Invoices by Plaintiffs Counsel filed by All Plaintiffs, 10051 MOTION Submitting Transition and Litigation Plan filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 3/5/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/17/12.(mmi) (Entered: 02/17/2012)

02/23/2012

10080

Minute Proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty: Video Conference held on 2/23/2012. Memorandum re: Curnyn's hourly rates due by 3/14/2012. Marked Exhibits due by 3/21/2012. Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/30/2012 11:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. (Court Reporter Zulma Ruiz.)Hearing set for 11:00.Hearing held at 11:00.Hearing ended at 12:20. (ct) (Main Document 10080 replaced on 2/27/2012 to correct typographical error) (cm). (Entered: 02/23/2012)

02/23/2012

Docket entries 10026 and 10078 modified to remove docket entry restrictions per order 10080 . (cm) (Entered: 02/23/2012)

02/23/2012

10081

ORDER re 10026 Notice RE: Curnyn invoices, 10078 Curnyn Report, filed by the defendants, Memorandum Filing due by 3/14/2012 re: legal issues and Curnyn's hourly rate. Motions in limine and exhibits due by 3/21/2012. Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/30/2012 11:00 AM in Courtroom 2 before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty.Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/23/12.(mmi) (Entered: 02/23/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 468 of 513

02/23/2012 10082 AMENDED ORDER re 10081 Order, correcting the name of the person present for Curnyn Consulting. All the previously set deadlines remain the same.Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/24/12.(mmi) (Entered: 02/24/2012)

02/27/2012 10083 ORDER approving 10077 Motion requesting approval for expert in the area of classification of inmates ( Dr. Austin) Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/27/12. (mmi) (Entered: 02/27/2012)

02/27/2012

10084

Minute for Proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Video Conference held on 2/27/2012. Re: 10051 Motion submitting AND 10079 Report and Recommendation. Revised transition plan due within 7 days. CHSC contract due by the end of the week. (Court Reporter Zulma Ruiz.)(ct) (Entered: 02/27/2012)

02/27/2012 10085 ORAL ORDER re 10084 Minutes. CASE STAYED FOR 30 ADDITIONAL DAYS. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/27/2012.(ct) (Entered: 02/27/2012)

02/27/2012 10086 Status Report on Settlement Negotiations filed by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of All Parties (Lausell−Recurt, Steven) Modified on 3/27/2012 to correct the nature of the document, it is not a motion(mmi). (Entered: 02/27/2012)

02/28/2012 10087 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10079 Report and Recommendation, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Certificate of Registration)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/28/2012)

03/01/2012 10088 ORDER granting in part and denying in part 10033 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/1/12. (mmi) (Entered: 03/02/2012)

03/02/2012 10089 MOTION requesting Order for Disbursement of Funds filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Signed Copy of Extension, # 2 Exhibit Budget request 3rd Quarter Fiscal Year 2012)(Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 03/02/2012)

03/05/2012 10090 REPORT [Amended Plan for Transfer and Preservation of Files] by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/05/2012)

03/05/2012 10091 ORDER adopting in part Report and Recommendation re 10079 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/5/12. (mmi) (Entered: 03/05/2012)

03/05/2012 10092 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER of disbursements Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/5/12.(mmi) (Entered: 03/05/2012)

03/07/2012 10093 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**MOTION to Amend/Correct Order for Disbursement of Funds Re: 10092 Order filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/23/2012 (Related document(s) 10092 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/07/2012)

03/07/2012 10094 ORDER granting 10093 Motion to Amend/Correct Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/7/12. (mmi) (Entered: 03/07/2012)

03/07/2012 10095 ***SELECTED PARTIES***AMENDED ORDER OF DISBURSEMENT Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/7/12.(mmi) (Entered: 03/07/2012)

03/07/2012 10096 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER re 10090 Report filed by All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/7/12.(mmi) (Entered: 03/07/2012)

03/08/2012 10097 TRANSCRIPT REQUEST by Nuria Rivera on behalf of Curnyn Consulting, Ltd., for Video Conference proceedings held on 2/23/2012 before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. (cm) (Entered: 03/08/2012)

03/14/2012

10098

Transcript of Status Conference held on February 23, 2012, before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. Court Reporter/Transcriber Zulma M. Ruiz, Telephone number 787−772−3375. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 469 of 513

terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Redaction Request due 4/5/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 4/16/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 6/14/2012. (zr) (Entered: 03/14/2012)

03/14/2012 10099 MOTION for Leave to Appear filed by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards on behalf of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/30/2012 (Beauchamp−Richards, Christina) (Entered: 03/14/2012)

03/14/2012

10100

Motion In Compliance with order regarding reasonableness of Curnyn Consulting Ltd's hourly rate filed by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards on behalf of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Unsworn statement under penalty of perjury, # 2 Affidavit Unsworn statement under penalty of perjury)(Beauchamp−Richards, Christina) (Entered: 03/14/2012)

03/14/2012 10101 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding REASONABLENESS OF CURNYNS HOURLY RATES, Motion In Compliance filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/14/2012)

03/15/2012

10102

ORDER granting 10099 Motion for Leave to Appear Granted. The court notes that the Commonwealth has not sought to be relieved of its obligation as the moving party at the upcoming evidentiary hearing. As the moving party, the Commonwealth will bear the burden to prove Curnyn Consulting, Ltd.'s entitlement to the fees. Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/15/12. (mmi) (Entered: 03/15/2012)

03/15/2012

10103

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION for Disbursement of Funds, submitting February 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Appendix 2 − Rafael Rodriguez Rivera's Invoices, # 3 Appendix 3 − Lillian Miranda's Invoices, # 4 Appendix 4 − Ivonne Olmos's Invoices, # 5 Appendix 5 − Fermin Aarraiza Navas' Invoice, # 6 Appendix 6 − Meba Diaz's Invoices, # 7 Appendix 7 − Jose Roque Velazquez's Invoices, # 8 Appendix 8 − Sreven Lausell Recurt's Invoices, # 9 Appendix 9 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodriguez)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) Modified on 4/4/2012 to edit event title(cm). (Entered: 03/15/2012)

03/15/2012 10104 SPECIAL MASTER'S FIRST REPORT (Signed by Hon. Charles A. Cordero, Special Master on 3/15/12. (Attachments: # 1 Comprehensive Agreement (Pages 1−19), # 2 Comprehensive Agreement (Pages 20−44), # 3 Comprehensive Agreement (Pages 45−79))(su) (Entered: 03/15/2012)

03/21/2012 10105 ORDER granting 10100 Motion In Compliance, 10101 Informative Motion Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/21/12. (mmi) Modified on 3/21/2012 (mmi) to add the link to 10101. (Entered: 03/21/2012)

03/21/2012 10106 **FILED IN ERROR−INCOMPLETE PDF**INFORMATIVE Motion regarding CURNYNS REPRESENTATION IN THE UPCOMING EVIDENTIARY HEARING filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 3/22/2012 (cm). (Entered: 03/21/2012)

03/21/2012

10107

Joint MOTION Submitting Exhibits CURNYN 1 − 20 Exhibits filed by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards on behalf of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CURNYN 1, April 2011 invoice, # 2 Exhibit CURNYN 2, May 2011 invoice, # 3 Exhibit CURNYN 3, June 2011 invoice, # 4 Exhibit CURNYN 4, Attachment A, # 5 Exhibit CURNYN 5, Attachment B, # 6 Exhibit CURNYN 6, Resume Garvey, # 7 Exhibit CURNYN 7, Resume Vaughan, # 8 Exhibit CURNYN 8, Resume Rivera, # 9 Exhibit CURNYN 9, Memorandum May 25, 2010, # 10 Exhibit CURNYN 10, Memo re Curnyn deliverables, # 11 Exhibit CURNYN 11, Addendum to invoices, # 12 Exhibit CURNYN 12, Scope of services, # 13 Exhibit CURNYN 13, Issues re food services, # 14 Exhibit CURNYN 14, Food services report, # 15 Exhibit CURNYN 15, Compliance re food services, # 16 Exhibit CURNYN 16, memo re discovery requests, # 17 Exhibit CURNYN 17, Memo May 3, 2010, # 18 Exhibit CURNYN 18, Initial crowding report, # 19 Exhibit CURNYN 19, Report on capacity, # 20 Exhibit CURNYN 20, Draft work plan)(Beauchamp−Richards, Christina) (Entered: 03/21/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 470 of 513

03/21/2012

10108

Joint MOTION Submitting Exhibits CURNYN 21 −36 Exhibits for evidentiary hearing filed by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards on behalf of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CURNYN 21, Report on capacity field visits, # 2 Exhibit CURNYN 22, Docs re capacity and overcrowding, # 3 Exhibit CURNYN 23, memo re recreation and access, # 4 Exhibit CURNYN 24, Expert Witness Report re Access, # 5 Exhibit CURNYN 25, Table A Expert Report, # 6 Exhibit CURNYN 26, Table B Expert Report, # 7 Exhibit CURNYN 27, Table C Expert Report, # 8 Exhibit CURNYN 28, Example re legal resources, # 9 Exhibit CURNYN 29, Memo re recreation, # 10 Exhibit CURNYN 30, Email re classification manual, # 11 Exhibit CURNYN 31, Memo re classification and definition of security, # 12 Exhibit CURNYN 32, Email re visitation, # 13 Exhibit CURNYN 33, Request for Information, # 14 Exhibit CURNYN 34, Funding proposal, # 15 Exhibit CURNYN 35, Exhibit re Guerrero admissions, # 16 Exhibit CURNYN 36, Translation of Curnyn 28)(Beauchamp−Richards, Christina) (Entered: 03/21/2012)

03/22/2012 10109 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding CURNYNS REPRESENTATION IN THE UPCOMING EVIDENTIARY HEARING filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/22/2012)

03/26/2012 10110 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**DEWBERRY REPORT. (mmi) (Entered: 03/26/2012)

03/26/2012

10111

ORDER The Correctional Health Services Corp and the Defendants shall meet and confer with a representative from the Dewberry Architects, Inc. and unless all outstanding issues are resolved by agreement, the parties shall respond to Document #10110 within 14 days.Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 4/9/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/26/12.(mmi) (Entered: 03/26/2012)

03/27/2012 10112 Minutes of Setting: The Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/30/2012 11:00 AM will take place in Courtroom 4 before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. (Clerk) (ct) (Entered: 03/27/2012)

03/28/2012 10113 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** Motion In Compliance Submitting Amended Case Budget and Litigation Plan for the Case of Sanchez−Caycoya v. ELA filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/28/2012)

03/28/2012 10114 ORDER The parties request for an additional stay of 30 days is granted.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/28/12.(mmi) (Entered: 03/28/2012)

03/28/2012

10115

ORDER granting 10058 Motion submitting, 10089 motion requesting disbursement The request is approved. The clerk shall disburse $8,443,248 from fine funds to the Correctional Health Services Corporation to cover anticipated expenditures during the third and fourth quarters of the current fiscal year. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/28/12. (mmi) (Entered: 03/28/2012)

03/29/2012 10116 Minutes of Setting: As daylight savings time commenced in March, and therefore New Hampshire and Puerto Rico are under the same time zone, the Evidentiary Hearing set for 3/30/2012 will be held at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty. (gsr) (Entered: 03/29/2012)

03/30/2012 10118 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty:Evidentiary Hearing held on 3/30/2012. (Court Reporter Zulma Ruiz/FTR Courtroom 4.) (cr) (Entered: 04/03/2012)

04/03/2012 10117 REPORT on the use of fine funds by the Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad for the trimester covering the months of January, February and March 2012. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Statistical Report) (cm) (Entered: 04/03/2012)

04/09/2012

10119

***SELECTED PARTIES*** Filed in Error see doc #100120 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10072 MOTION Submitting January 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs, 10103 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 4/26/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 4/9/12.(mmi) Modified on 4/10/2012 (mmi). (Entered: 04/10/2012)

04/10/2012 10120 ***SELECTED PARTIES***AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10103 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 4/27/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 4/10/12.(mmi) (Entered: 04/10/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 471 of 513

04/10/2012

10121

MOTION for Extension of Time until April 14, 2012 to file RESPOND TO COURTS CONSULTANT REPORT ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CENTER filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/26/2012 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 04/10/2012)

04/11/2012 10122 ORDER granting 10121 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Report Deadline due by 4/13/2012. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/11/12. (mmi) (Entered: 04/11/2012)

04/13/2012

10123

SUBMITTING RESPONSE TO COURTS CONSULTANT REPORT ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CENTER filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Heriberto Acevedo, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Zoraida Buxo, Sila M. Calderon, Johnny Colon, Correctional Health Services Corporation, Irba Cruz de Batista, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Carmen Feliciano, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Nestor Galarza, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Julian O. McConnie, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Johnny Rullan, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Isabel Suliveres, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Lorenzo Villalba (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Report by CMC Project Manager)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 4/16/2012 removed words Motion in Compliance (mmi). (Entered: 04/13/2012)

04/13/2012

10124

Memorandum in support of Curnyn Consulting's request for payment of pending invoices filed by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards on behalf of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit 1: NPR calendar and notes, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit 2: RFI vendor submissions, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit 3: initial report re: RFI, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit 6: NPR June 29, 2011 email, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit 7: JG reports and emails)(Beauchamp−Richards, Christina) Modified on 4/16/2012 removed words Motion in Compliance (mmi). (Entered: 04/13/2012)

04/13/2012 10125 OBJECTION to Payment from Fine Funds of Invoices Submitted by Curnyn Consulting filed by All Plaintiffs filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/13/2012)

04/13/2012

10126

Addendum to 10124 and submitting, regarding Exhibit 4: AOC staffing reports filed by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards on behalf of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 4A: pages 1−150, AOC staffing documents, # 2 Exhibit 4B: pages 151−300, AOC staffing documents, # 3 Exhibit 4C: pages 301−450, AOC staffing documents, # 4 Exhibit 4D: pages 451−564, AOC staffing documents)(Beauchamp−Richards, Christina) Modified on 4/16/2012 removed words Motion in Compliance(mmi). (Entered: 04/13/2012)

04/13/2012

10127

Addendum to 10124 and submitting, regarding Exhibit 5, "initial analysis and notes" filed by Christina M Beauchamp−Richards on behalf of Curnyn Consulting Ltd. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 5A: pages 1−25, notes and initial analysis, # 2 Exhibit 5B: pages 26−50, notes and initial analysis, # 3 Exhibit 5C: pages 51−75, notes and initial analysis, # 4 Exhibit 5D: pages 76−100, notes and initial analysis, # 5 Exhibit 5E: pages 101−300, notes and initial analysis)(Beauchamp−Richards, Christina) Modified on 4/16/2012 removed words Motion in Compliance(mmi). (Entered: 04/13/2012)

04/16/2012

10128

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting March 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Appendix 2 − Rafael Rodriguez Rivera's Invoices, # 3 Appendix 3 − Lillian Miranda's Invoices, # 4 Appendix 4 − Ivonne Olmos's Invoices, # 5 Appendix 5 − Fermin Aarraiza Navas' Invoice, # 6 Appendix 6 − Meba Diaz's Invoices, # 7 Appendix 7 − Jose Roque Velazquez's Invoices, # 8 Appendix 8 − Sreven Lausell Recurt's Invoices, # 9 Appendix 9 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodriguez, # 10 Appendix 10 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos, Inc., for April rent)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/16/2012)

04/23/2012 10129 ORDER re 10117 Report filed by Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/23/12.(mmi) (Entered: 04/23/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 472 of 513

04/27/2012 10130 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY Invoice REPORT by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 04/27/2012)

04/27/2012

10131

ORDER re 10130 Dewberry Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days.Response to Motion Deadline due by 5/7/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/27/12.(mmi) (Entered: 04/27/2012)

05/08/2012 10132 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10103 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; adopting 10120 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/8/12. (mmi) (Entered: 05/09/2012)

05/14/2012 10133 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10128 MOTION Submitting March 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 6/1/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 5/14/12.(mmi) (Entered: 05/14/2012)

05/16/2012 10134 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** MOTION for Leave to Appear filed by Miguel Sarriera−Roman on behalf of Roman Miguel Sarriera Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/1/2012 (Sarriera−Roman, Miguel) (Entered: 05/16/2012)

05/18/2012 10135 ORDER re 10130 Report filed by Dewberry Clerk is to disburse fundsSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/18/12.(mmi) (Entered: 05/21/2012)

06/05/2012 10136 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 9959 Request for payment of invoices by Cunrnyn Consulting, Ltd. filed by the defendants Objections to R&R due by 6/22/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 6/5/12.(mmi) (Entered: 06/05/2012)

06/06/2012 10137 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER denying 10134 Motion for Leave to Appear The motion addresses a debt of the corporation that should be addressed in bankruptcy court. Motion denied Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/6/12. (mmi) (Entered: 06/06/2012)

06/07/2012

10138

MOTION for DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS FOR DR. JAMES AUSTIN CONSULTING SERVICES AS EXPERT IN THE AREA OF CLASSIFICATION OF INMATES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Dr. James Austin's May 2012 invoice)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 6/8/2012 to correct event type (cm). (Entered: 06/07/2012)

06/08/2012 10139 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 10133 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/8/2012. (mmi) (Entered: 06/08/2012)

06/08/2012 10140 ORDER granting 10138 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Motion granted. The clerk shall disburse $2796.34 to Dr James Austin from fine funds in the court's registry account. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/8/12. (mmi) (Entered: 06/08/2012)

06/16/2012

10141

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting April 2012 Invoices by Plaintiff's Counsel filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − GRL's Invoice, # 2 Appendix 2 − RERR's Invoices, # 3 Appendix 3 − LMR's Invoices, # 4 Appendix 4 − JRV's Invoices, # 5 Appendix 5 − MDR's Invoices, # 6 Appendix 6 − IOR's Invoices, # 7 Appendix 7 − FAR's Invoice, # 8 Appendix 8 − Invoices by Servicios Juridicos & SLR, # 9 Appendix 9 − TPR's Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/16/2012)

06/20/2012 10142 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY REPORT (mmi) (Entered: 06/20/2012)

06/20/2012

10143

ORDER, Set Deadlines The Correctional Health Services Corp, the Plaintiffs and the Defendants shall meet and confer with a representative from the Dewberry Architects, Inc. and unless all outstanding issues are resolved by agreement, the parties shall respond to Document #10142 within 14 days.Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 7/5/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/20/12.(mmi) (Entered: 06/20/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 473 of 513

06/29/2012 10144 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10141 MOTION Submitting April 2012 Invoices by Plaintiff's Counsel filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 7/16/2012Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 6/29/12.(mmi) (Entered: 07/02/2012)

07/02/2012

10145

REPORT on the Use of Fine Funds by the Hogar Santisima Trinidad for the Trimester covering the Months of April, May and June 2012. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A).(cm) Modified on 7/10/2012 to edit text(cm). (Main Document 10145 replaced on 8/6/2012 to correct months to April, May & June). (cm) (Entered: 07/02/2012)

07/18/2012 10146 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY INVOICE REPORT by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 07/18/2012)

07/18/2012

10147

ORDER re 10146 Dewberry Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days.Response Deadline due by 7/26/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/18/12.(mmi) (Entered: 07/18/2012)

07/19/2012 10148 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10141 Motion submitting ; adopting Report and Recommendation re 10144 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/19/12. (mmi) (Entered: 07/19/2012)

07/19/2012

10149

Joint MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT ACCORD CONTENT AND MANNER OF NOTICE, AND SETTING OF FINAL APPROVAL HEARING filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Parties (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Settlement Accord)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/19/2012)

07/23/2012

10150

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION for Disbursement of Funds of May 2012 Invoices by Plaintiff's Counsel filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − GRL's Invoice, # 2 Appendix 2 − RERR's Invoices, # 3 Appendix 3 − LMR's Invoices, # 4 Appendix 4 − JRV's Invoices, # 5 Appendix 5 − MDR's Invoices, # 6 Appendix 6 − FAN's Invoices, # 7 Appendix 7 − Invoices by SLR and Servicios Jurdicos, Inc., # 8 Appendix 8 − TPR's Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) Modified on 7/24/2012 to correct event type (cm). (Entered: 07/23/2012)

07/24/2012

10151

Joint NOTICE of Filing Exhibits Proposed Order for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Accord re 10149 Joint MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT ACCORD CONTENT AND MANNER OF NOTICE, AND SETTING OF FINAL APPROVAL HEARING filed by Roberto Velez, Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Hector Manuel Sanchez−Castro, Jaime Pedrosa−Colon, Victor Velazquez−Caussade, Julio Medina−Medina, Felix Torres−Garcia, Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, Joe Colon, Jorge Rondon−Melendez, Gerardo Cruz−Soto, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, Comite de Amigos y Familiares de Confinados, Inc., Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Angelo Ravelo−Garcia, Luis Romero−Rivera, Maximiliano Amparo−Concepcion, Johnny Colon, Otto Riefkohl, Curnyn Consulting Ltd., Administracion de Correccion y Rehabilitacion, USA, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Hogar Catolico Santisima Trinidad, Miguel A. Nieves−Ruiz, All Plaintiffs, Jose Manuel Delgado−Torres, Benito Rosario, Aixa Mariano, Maria Riscard, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Joseph F. Colon, Canteen Correctional Services, Otto Riefkohl−Gorbea, Jose L. Jimenez−Quinones, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Carlos Cruz−Serrano, Israel Alers, EBP, Luis A. Custodian Officer Feliciano, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Sigfredo Zambrana−De−Jesus, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Gladys Rivera−Correa, Prairie Correctional Facility Corporation (PCF), Judith Matias−De−Leon, Alexis Diaz−Torres, Jesus Ramos−Cedeno, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Walter Diaz−Rojas, Luis Munoz−Munoz, Dario Castillo−Robles, Carlos Pizarro−Sostre, MGT of America, Union General de Trabajadores (UGT), Isabel Suliveres, Association for the Rights and Rehabilitation of Inmates Population, Group of Prisoners of the Mental Health Program, Geraldo Cruz−Soto, Sila M. Calderon, Samuel Sanchez−Santana, Edwin Marcucci−Caraballo, Lorenzo Villalba, Rodolfo Cecilio−Figueroa, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Eli Samuel Concepcion−Maestre, Correctional Health Department, Orquidea Villanueva, KSP Surety & Bonding Corporation, Raymond Rivera−Rios, Jorge Delgado−Golash, Heriberto Acevedo,

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 474 of 513

Julian O. McConnie, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Ramon Mellado, Angel Miranda, Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez, Defendant−All, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Tomas Melendez−Sanchez, Juanita Gomez, Luis E. Tirado−Barreras, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Civil Action and Education Corporation, Roberto Gonzalez−Cruz, Johnny Rullan, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Ricardo Laureano−Bermudez, Roman Miguel Sarriera, Ricardo Mercado, U.S. Probation, Evaristo Cruz, Efrain Ortiz−Vega, Irba Cruz de Batista, Nydia Cotto−Vives, Justo Torres−Garcia, Salvador Borta−Lebron, Edwin Vazquez−Rodriguez, Mirla M. Rodriguez−Marin, Celia Alamo, Hector A. Gabriel, Luis F. Pacheco−Carmona, Zoe Laboy, Jose G. Pena−Sanchez, Israel Correa−Rivera, Correctional Health Services Corporation, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Rosendo J. Rodriguez−Melendez, Joseph Maya−Gambino, Nestor Galarza, Hector Ocasio−Ortiz, Carmen Feliciano, Juan A. Garcia, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Notice to Plaintiff Class) (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/24/2012)

08/01/2012 10152 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** ORDER re 10146 DEWBERRY INVOICE Report: Clerk to disburse funds. Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/1/2012.(ni) (Entered: 08/02/2012)

08/03/2012

10153

ORDER preliminary approving 10151 Joint NOTICE of Filing Exhibits Proposed Order for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Accord re: 10149 Joint MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT ACCORD CONTENT AND MANNER OF NOTICE, AND SETTING OF FINAL APPROVAL HEARING filed by All Plaintiffs, and 10149 Joint MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT ACCORD CONTENT AND MANNER OF NOTICE, AND SETTING OF FINAL APPROVAL HEARING. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/3/12.(li) (Entered: 08/03/2012)

08/09/2012

10154

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting June 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − GRL's Invoice, # 2 Appendix 2 − RERR's Invoices, # 3 Appendix 3 − LMR's Invoices, # 4 Appendix 4 − JRV's Invoices, # 5 Appendix 5 − MDR's Invoices, # 6 Appendix 6 − IOR's Invoices, # 7 Appendix 7 − SLR's Invoices, # 8 Appendix 8 − TPR's Invoices, # 9 Appendix 9 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos, Inc.)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 08/09/2012)

08/13/2012 10155 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10150 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 8/30/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 08/09/2012.(cm) (Entered: 08/13/2012)

08/21/2012

10156

Joint Motion for disbursement of funds re: NOTICE Plan by Heriberto Acevedo, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, All Plaintiffs, Zoraida Buxo, Sila M. Calderon, Johnny Colon, Irba Cruz de Batista, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Carmen Feliciano, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Nestor Galarza, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Julian O. McConnie, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Johnny Rullan, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Isabel Suliveres, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Lorenzo Villalba re 10153 Order,, (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Translations Invoice, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Newspapers' Quote, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Copier's Quote) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) Modified on 8/22/2012 to edit event title (cm). (Entered: 08/21/2012)

08/24/2012

10157

MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for First and Second Quarter of Fiscal Year 2012−2013 for CHSC filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of Heriberto Acevedo, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Zoraida Buxo, Sila M. Calderon, Johnny Colon, Correctional Health Services Corporation, Irba Cruz de Batista, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Carmen Feliciano, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Nestor Galarza, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Julian O. McConnie, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Johnny Rullan, Jose E.

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 475 of 513

Soler−Zapata, Isabel Suliveres, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Lorenzo Villalba Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/10/2012 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CHSC Budget for 1 and 2 Quarter FY 2012−2013)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 8/27/2012 to correct event title (cm). (Entered: 08/24/2012)

08/27/2012 10158 ORDER granting 10156 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/27/12. (mmi) (Entered: 08/27/2012)

09/11/2012

10160

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER, Set Hearings The clerk shall set a video conference hearing to discuss the status of the hospital construction project and the Correctional Health Service Corporation's funding request Status Conference set for 9/26/2012 03:30 PM in Courtroom 2 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/11/12.(mmi) (Entered: 09/13/2012)

09/12/2012 10159 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10154 MOTION Submitting June 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs. Objections to R&R due by 10/1/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 9/12/2012.(cm) (Entered: 09/12/2012)

09/13/2012 10161 Minutes of Setting: The Status Conference set for 9/26/2012 at 03:30 PM will take place in Courtroom 10 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. (gsr) (Entered: 09/13/2012)

09/25/2012 10162 ORDER denying as moot 9999 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. The motion is denied as moot because counsel has died. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/25/12. (mmi) (Entered: 09/25/2012)

09/25/2012 10163 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10150 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; adopting Report and Recommendation re 10155 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 09/25/12. (mmi) (Entered: 09/25/2012)

09/25/2012 10164 ORDER: Video Status Conference set for 9/26/2012 03:30 PM will take place in Courtroom 7 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/25/12.(ft) (Entered: 09/25/2012)

09/26/2012 10165 NOTICE Supplementing Court Remarks by All Plaintiffs re 10162 Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 09/26/2012)

09/26/2012 10170 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Video/ Status Conference held on 9/26/2012. (Court Reporter Amy Walker.) (ft) (Entered: 10/02/2012)

09/27/2012 10166 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation re 10136 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/27/12. (mmi) (Entered: 09/27/2012)

09/27/2012 10167 ORDER terminating 10145 Motion for Disbursement of Funds The court thanks Hogar for its submission. Further reporting will not be required nor will further funds be forthcoming. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/27/12. (mmi) (Entered: 09/27/2012)

09/27/2012 10169 ORDER terminating 10039 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/27/12. (mmi) (Entered: 10/01/2012)

09/28/2012 10168 ORDER granting 10157 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. The Clerk shall disburse the funds requested in the motion from fine funds. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/28/2012. (cm) (Entered: 09/28/2012)

10/04/2012 10171 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING (Attachments: # 1 Motion, # 2 Exhibit, # 3 Envelope) Notice w/Original documents sent to Eliezer Santana−Baez, C.R.B. A−292, Edif. 8C, PO Box 60−700, Bayamon, PR 00960.(cm) (Entered: 10/04/2012)

10/04/2012 10172 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. (Attachments: # 1 Motion, # 2 Envelope). Notice w/Original documents sent to Martin Febres−Cepeda, Inst. 384 Sabana Hoyos Ste 3 1−B #47, PO Box 31000, Arecibo, PR 00688.(cm) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 476 of 513

10/04/2012)

10/04/2012 10173 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. (Attachments: # 1 Motion, # 2 Envelope). Notice w/Original documents sent to Carlos Pillot−Ocasio, Anexo 292, Edif. 3−C, P.O. Box 60700, Bayamon, PR 00960.(cm) (Entered: 10/04/2012)

10/04/2012 10174 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. (Attachments: # 1 Motion, # 2 Envelope). Notice w/Original documents sent to Juan Echevarria De−Leon, Anexo Guayama 500, Edif. B, Secc.A, Celda 119, PO Box 10,005, Guayama, PR 00785−4005. (cm) (Entered: 10/04/2012)

10/04/2012 10175 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. (Attachments: # 1 Motion. Notice w/Original documents sent to Santos Nieves−Conde, Institicion Bayamon 501, Edif. 2−H, Celda 205, PO Box 60,7073, Bayamon, PR 00960.(cm) (Entered: 10/04/2012)

10/04/2012 10176 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. (Attachments: # 1 Motion, # 2 Envelope). Notice w/Original documents sent to Harry Martell Rodriguez, Inst. Ponce 500, Modulo E, Celda 201, PO Box 9008, Ponce, PR 00732. (cm) (Entered: 10/04/2012)

10/04/2012

10177

CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. (Attachments: # 1 Motion dated 10/3/2013, # 2 Envelope). Notice w/Original documents sent to Miguel Medina−Orta, Complejo Las Cucharas Ponce, Control 25, Secc. Azul 102B, PO Box 7126, Ponce, PR 00732. (cm) Modified on 10/16/2012 to add docket text. (cm). (Entered: 10/04/2012)

10/04/2012 10178 MOTION Requesting Temporary waiver of Local Rule 5(g) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/22/2012 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 10/04/2012)

10/10/2012 10179 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10154 Motion submitting ; adopting 10159 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/10/2012. (mmi) (Entered: 10/11/2012)

10/17/2012 10180 ORDER re: 10178 Motion requesting temporary waiver of Local Rule 5(g) denying to the extent it seeks relief inconsistent with the attached order Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/17/12. (mmi) Modified on 10/17/2012 (mmi)to remove repetitive wording. (Entered: 10/17/2012)

10/17/2012 10181 ORDER. The Hearing on the Accord set for 11/9/2012 10:00 AM will be held in Courtroom 5 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/17/12.(gsr) (Entered: 10/17/2012)

10/19/2012

10182

Acknowledgment of Receipt of 599 copies of defective filings written in the Spanish language received at the U.S. District Court from various inmates of the Bayamon, Ponce, Aguadilla, Penuelas, and other state correctional facilities. Original documents will be kept at the Clerk's Office Records Room. Signed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina, Esq. (cm) (Entered: 10/19/2012)

10/22/2012 10183 OBJECTION filed by Feliciano Rios−Disdier, Inmate of the Ponce Institution 500, Re: 10149 SETTLEMENT ACCORD. (cm) (Entered: 10/23/2012)

10/25/2012 10185 OBJECTION filed by Jorge Irizarry−Marti, Inmate of the Mayaguez Detention Center, Re: 10149 SETTLEMENT ACCORD (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 10/26/2012)

10/26/2012

10184

Acknowledgment of Receipt of 25 copies of defective filings written in the Spanish language received at the U.S. District Court from various inmates of the Bayamon, Ponce, Aguadilla, Penuelas, and other state correctional facilities. Original documents will be kept at the Clerk's Office Records Room. Signed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina, Esq. (cm) (Entered: 10/26/2012)

11/01/2012

10186

Acknowledgment of Receipt of 23 copies (postmarked by 10/26/2012), of defective filings written in the Spanish language received at the U.S. District Court from various inmates of the Bayamon, Ponce, Aguadilla, Penuelas, and other state correctional facilities. Original documents will be kept at the Clerk's Office Records Room. Signed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina, Esq. (cm) (Entered: 11/01/2012)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 477 of 513

11/06/2012

10187

Memorandum Summarizing Objections to Settlement Accord re 10180 Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief, filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/26/2012 (Related document(s) 10180 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) Modified on 11/7/2012 to edit event title (cm). Modified on 11/8/2012 to correct event.(mmi). (Entered: 11/06/2012)

11/07/2012

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk : Event title edited to read : 10187 MOTION Submitting Memorandum (cm) (Entered: 11/07/2012)

11/09/2012 10188 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro:Hearing on the Accord held on 11/9/2012. The Accord was approved. Order to follow.(Court Reporter Amy Walker.) (gsr) (Entered: 11/13/2012)

11/13/2012 10189 ENDORSED ORDER re 10188 Settlement Conference The Court held a hearing on settlement in this case on November 9, 2012. A transcript of that hearing is to be made and provided to the Court as soon as possible.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 11/13/12.(mmi) (Entered: 11/13/2012)

11/14/2012 10190 Plaintiffs' Exhibit List during hearing on the accord held on 11/9/12. (gsr) (Entered: 11/14/2012)

11/19/2012

10191

Transcript of Hearing held on November 9, 2012, before Honorable United States District Court Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Court Reporter/Transcriber Amy Walker, Telephone number prcsr123@gmail.com. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Redaction Request due 12/13/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 12/26/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 2/20/2013. (aw) (Entered: 11/19/2012)

11/27/2012 10192 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Dewberry Invoice REPORT by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 11/27/2012)

11/27/2012

10193

ORDER re 10192 Dewberry Invoice Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days.Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 12/7/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 11/27/12.(mmi) (Entered: 11/27/2012)

12/13/2012 10194 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10192 Dewberry Report filed as to Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs The invoice is approved. The clerk of court shall disburse the funds.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/13/12.(mmi) (Entered: 12/13/2012)

12/13/2012 10195 SETTLEMENT ACCORD/CONSENT DECREE by the parties. (mmi) Modified on 12/13/2012 to add consent decree(mmi). (Entered: 12/13/2012)

12/13/2012 10196 ORDER re 10195 Settlement Agreement by the parties approving the settlement agreementSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/13/12.(mmi) (Entered: 12/13/2012)

12/20/2012 10197 ORDER re: Dewbery Architect's continuation of consulting services. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/19/2012.(cm) (Entered: 12/20/2012)

12/20/2012 10198 ORDER, Parties to review the response to the Request for Proposal, Objections to response Deadline due by 1/8/2013. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/19/2012. (Attachments: # 1 **Case Participants**Request for Proposal by KPMG LLP)(cm) (Entered: 12/20/2012)

12/21/2012 10199 ORDER, Setting Various Deadlines : Correctional Health Services Corp., status report due by 2/27/2013. Commonwealth Status Reports due by 3/1/2013. Plaintiff's Proposed budget due on or before 1/28/2013. On 5/1/2013 and every six (6) months thereafter, the parties shall file joint status reports addressing

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 478 of 513

the implementation of the settlement agreement. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 12/20/2012.(cm) (Entered: 12/21/2012)

01/08/2013 10200 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/Dewberry Invoice #4 by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 01/10/2013)

01/08/2013

10201

ORDER re 10200 Dewberry Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response to Motion Deadline due by 5/7/2012.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro Response to Motion Deadline due by 1/17/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/8/13.(mmi) (Entered: 01/10/2013)

01/14/2013

10202

ORDER : No objections have been filed with respect to the proposal for auditing services submitted by KPMG LLP, a copy of which was attached to my 10198 Order of December 19, 2012. The court finds that the terms of the proposal are reasonable. Accordingly, the proposal is approved.SO ORDERED. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/11/2013.(cm) (Entered: 01/14/2013)

01/22/2013 10203 NOTICE OF ATTORNEY APPEARANCE as Co−counsel for Defendants filed by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of All Defendants (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) Modified on 2/12/2013 to correct the nature of the document (mmi). (Entered: 01/22/2013)

01/24/2013 10204 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/Third Quarter Budget Request from Correctional Health Services Corp by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 01/24/2013)

01/24/2013

10205

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10204 Report filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the Third Quarter Budget Request submitted by CHSC, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response to Motion Deadline due by 2/4/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/24/13.(mmi) (Entered: 01/24/2013)

01/24/2013 10206 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/Dewberry Invoice Report #3 by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Travel Invoice) (mmi) (Entered: 01/24/2013)

01/24/2013

10207

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10206 Dewberry Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days.Response to Motion Deadline due by 2/4/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/24/13.(mmi) (Entered: 01/24/2013)

01/24/2013 10208 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/Dewberry Invoice 4 by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 01/24/2013)

01/24/2013

10209

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10208 Dewberry Invoice Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response Due 2/4/13Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/24/13.(mmi) (Entered: 01/24/2013)

01/25/2013 10210 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10200 Dewberry Report The invoice is approved. The clerk of court shall disburse the funds.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 1/25/13.(mmi) (Entered: 01/25/2013)

01/28/2013 10211 MOTION for Extension of Time until February 7, 2013 to file Litigation Budget and Updated Litigation Plans filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/14/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/28/2013)

02/06/2013 10212 First MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/22/2013 (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 02/06/2013)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 479 of 513

02/07/2013 10213 Final MOTION for Extension of Time until February 19, 2013 to file Litigation Budget and Updated Litigation Plans filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/25/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/07/2013)

02/12/2013 10214 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10206 Dewberry Report The invoice is approved. The clerk of court shall disburse the funds.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/12/13.(mmi) Modified on 2/12/2013 to add text. (mmi). (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/12/2013 10215 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10208 Dewbery Report The invoice is approved. The clerk of court shall disburse the funds.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/12/13.(mmi) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/12/2013

10216

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10204 Third quarter budget Report filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation, The court has reviewed the budget request and has determined that it appropriate and is therefore approved.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/12/13.(mmi) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/12/2013

10217

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting July 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/28/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 4 Exhibit 4 − Invoices by Melba Daz Ramrez, # 5 Exhibit 5 − Invoices by Jos Roqu Velzquez, # 6 Exhibit 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodrguez, # 7 Exhibit 7 − Invoices by Steven Lausell recurt, # 8 Exhibit 7 − Invoices by Servicios Juridicos)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/12/2013

10218

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting August 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/28/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 4 Exhibit 4 − Invoices by Melba Daz Ramrez, # 5 Exhibit 5 − Invoices by Jos Roqu Velzquez, # 6 Exhibit 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodrguez, # 7 Exhibit 7 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 8 Exhibit 8 − Invoices by Servicios Juridicos, # 9 Exhibit 9 − Invoices by Rafael Rodrguez Rivera, # 10 Exhibit 10 − Invocie by Fermn Arraiza Navas)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/12/2013

10219

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting September 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/28/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Exhibit 3 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 4 Exhibit 4 − Invoices by Melba Daz Ramrez, # 5 Exhibit 5 − Invoices by Jos Roqu Velzquez, # 6 Exhibit 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodrguez, # 7 Exhibit 7 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 8 Exhibit 8 − Invoices by Servicios Juridicos, # 9 Exhibit 9 − Invoices by Rafael Rodrguez Rivera, # 10 Exhibit 10 − Invocie by Fermn Arraiza Navas)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/12/2013 10220 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket Nos. 10217 − 10219) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/28/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/12/2013

10221

MOTION to Excuse Delay re 10219 MOTION Submitting September 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs, 10218 MOTION Submitting August 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs, 10217 MOTION Submitting July 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/28/2013 (Related document(s) 10219 , 10218 , 10217 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/12/2013)

02/13/2013 10222 ORDER granting 10221 Motion to excuse the delay Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/13/13. (mmi) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

02/13/2013 10223 ORDER finding as moot 10211 Motion for Extension of Time to File The motion for extension is denied as moot Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/13/13. (mmi) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 480 of 513

02/13/2013

10224

ORDER granting 10213 Motion for Extension of Time to File The final motion for extension of time is granted. The motion for extension of time is denied as moot.Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 2/19/2013 re: filing of the Litigation Budget and updated litigation plans. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/13/13. (mmi) (Entered: 02/13/2013)

02/14/2013 10225 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10216 Order, in light of my order dated February 12, 2013, the Clerk shall disburse the funds. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/14/13.(mmi) (Entered: 02/14/2013)

02/15/2013

10226

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting October 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/4/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Appendix 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 4 Appendix 4 − Invoices by Melba Daz Ramrez, # 5 Appendix 5 − Invoices by Jos Roqu Velzquez, # 6 Appendix 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodrguez, # 7 Appendix 7 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 8 Appendix 8 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos, # 9 Appendix 9 − Invoice by Rafael Rodrguez Rivera, # 10 Appendix 10 − Invocie by Fermn Arraiza Navas)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/15/2013)

02/15/2013 10227 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket No. 10226) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/4/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/15/2013)

02/19/2013 10228 STATUS REPORT and Proposed Litigation Budget by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

02/19/2013

10229

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting November 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/7/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luia, # 2 Appendix 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 4 Appendix 4 − Invoices by Melba Daz Ramrez, # 5 Appendix 5 − Invoices by Jos Roqu Velzquez, # 6 Appendix 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodrguez, # 7 Appendix 7 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 8 Appendix 8 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos, # 9 Appendix 9 − Invoice by Rafael Rodrguez Rivera, # 10 Appendix 10 − Invocie by Fermn Arraiza Navas)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

02/19/2013 10230 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket No. 10229) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/7/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/19/2013)

02/27/2013 10231 ORDER The Court will hold a Video Conference re: the status of this case on 3/5/2013 at 10:00 AM (EST) before Judge Paul J Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/27/13.(mmi) (Entered: 02/27/2013)

02/27/2013 10232 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/15/2013 (Lausell−Recurt, Steven) (Entered: 02/27/2013)

02/27/2013 10233 First MOTION for Extension of Time until March 11 or April 15, 2013 to file CHSC Funding Source filed by Carlos Del−Valle−Cruz on behalf of Alejandro Garcia−Padilla Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/15/2013 (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Entered: 02/27/2013)

02/27/2013 10234 ORDER granting 10232 INFORMATIVE motion for Tanaira Padilla Rodrguez, to withdraw as counsel for the plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/27/13. (mmi) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

02/27/2013 10235 ORDER granting 10220 Motion to Restrict docket Nos 10217−10219 Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/27/13. (mmi) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

02/27/2013 10236 ORDER granting 10230 Motion to Restrict docket no. 10229 Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 2/27/13. (mmi) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

02/28/2013 10237 ORDER The Video Conference re:Status set for 3/5/2013 at 11:00 AM (AST) (10:00 AM EST) will be held in Courtroom 5 before Judge Paul J

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 481 of 513

Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/28/13.(gsr) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

02/28/2013 10238 ORDER. Parties to take notice that the video status conference set for 3/5/2013 at 11:00 AM (AST) will now be held in courtroom 3 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/28/13.(gsr) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

02/28/2013 10239 ORDER taking under advisement 10233 Motion for Extension of Time until March 11 or April 15, 2013 to file CHSC Funding Source The parties shall be prepared to discuss this motion during the status conference. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 2/28/13. (mmi) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

02/28/2013

10240

REPORT In Compliance with Order at Docket 10199 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/18/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Staffing Analysis for the CMC)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 2/28/2013 to correct document type(mmi). (Entered: 02/28/2013)

02/28/2013 10241 MOTION for Leave to File Spanish language documents filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/18/2013 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 02/28/2013)

03/04/2013

10242

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Updated Litigation Plans for Pending Individual Cases re: 10228 Status Report filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/21/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Updated Litigation Plans for Pending Individual Cases)(Related document(s) 10228 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/04/2013)

03/04/2013 10243 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10242) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/21/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/04/2013)

03/04/2013 10244 STATUS REPORT on Pending Individual Cases by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/04/2013)

03/04/2013 10245 ORDER granting 10241 Motion for Leave to File Spanish language documents Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/4/13. (mmi) (Entered: 03/04/2013)

03/04/2013 10246 ORDER granting 10227 Motion to Restrict Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/4/13. (mmi) (Entered: 03/04/2013)

03/05/2013 10247 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro:Status Conference held on 3/5/2013. (Court Reporter FTR.) (gsr) (Entered: 03/05/2013)

03/05/2013 10248 ORDER granting 10233 Motion for Extension of Time to File Memorandum Filing due by 4/15/2013 re: CHSC Funding Source. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/5/13. (mmi) (Entered: 03/05/2013)

03/06/2013 10249 ORDER granting 10243 Motion to Restrict, Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/4/2013. (cm) (Entered: 03/06/2013)

03/07/2013 10250 ORDER summarizing video conference held on 3/5/2013, Joint Status Report due by 5/1/2013. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 3/6/2013.(cm) (Entered: 03/07/2013)

03/11/2013 10251 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10217 MOTION Submitting July 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 3/28/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/11/13.(mmi) (Entered: 03/12/2013)

03/13/2013 10252 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10218 MOTION Submitting August 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/13/13.(mmi) (Entered: 03/13/2013)

03/13/2013 10253 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10219 MOTION Submitting September 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 482 of 513

R&R due by 4/1/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/13/13.(mmi) (Entered: 03/13/2013)

03/14/2013 10254 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10226 MOTION Submitting October 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/14/13.(mmi) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

03/14/2013 10255 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10229 MOTION Submitting November 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 4/1/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/14/13.(mmi) (Entered: 03/15/2013)

03/26/2013

10256

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting December 2012 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/11/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez, # 4 Appendix 4 − Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez, # 5 Appendix 5 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 6 Appendix 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodrguez, # 7 Appendix 7 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos, Inc.)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/26/2013)

03/26/2013

10257

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting January 2013 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/11/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 4 Appendix 4 − Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez, # 5 Appendix 5 − Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez, # 6 Appendix 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodriguez, # 7 Appendix 7 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 8 Appendix 8 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/26/2013)

03/26/2013 10258 MOTION to Restrict Document − Dockets 10256 and 10257 filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/11/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/26/2013)

03/26/2013 10259 ORDER granting 10258 Motion to Restrict Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 3/26/13. (mmi) (Entered: 03/27/2013)

03/28/2013

10260

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting February 2013 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/15/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez, # 4 Appendix 4 − Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez, # 5 Appendix 5 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 6 Appendix 6 − Invoices by Tanaira Padilla Rodriguez, # 7 Appendix 7 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 8 Appendix 8 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/28/2013)

03/28/2013 10261 MOTION to Restrict Document − Docket 10260 filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/15/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/28/2013)

03/28/2013 10262 MOTION Submitting Translation of Document filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/15/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Translation of Attachment to Docket 10240)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/28/2013)

04/02/2013 10263 REPORT on the Transfer and Preservation of Files and Request for Reimbursement of Additional Expenses Incurred by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Certified Copies of Checks) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/02/2013)

04/03/2013 10264 ORDER granting 10261 Motion to Restrict document Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 4/3/13. (mmi) (Entered: 04/03/2013)

04/04/2013 10265 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10217 Motion submitting ; adopting Report and Recommendation re 10251 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/4/13. (mmi) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 483 of 513

04/04/2013 10266 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10219 Motion submitting ; adopting Report and Recommendation 10253 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/4/13. (mmi) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

04/04/2013 10267 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10229 Motion submitting ; adopting Report and Recommendation 10255 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/4/13. (mmi) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

04/04/2013 10268 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10226 Motion submitting ; adopting Report and Recommendation 10254 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/4/13. (mmi) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

04/04/2013 10269 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10218 Motion submitting ; adopting Report and Recommendation 10252 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/4/2013. (mmi) (Entered: 04/05/2013)

04/11/2013

10271

***SELECTED PARTIES***AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (See Appendix 8 of docket 10229), re 10255 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10229 MOTION Submitting November 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 4/10/2013.(cm) (Entered: 04/11/2013)

04/15/2013 10272 Motion In Compliance regarding continuing funding of CHSC filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/2/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 04/15/2013)

04/15/2013 10273 MOTION for Leave to File Spanish language documents filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/2/2013 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 04/15/2013)

04/15/2013 10274 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10256 MOTION Submitting December 2012 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 5/2/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 4/15/13.(mmi) (Entered: 04/17/2013)

04/16/2013 10275 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10257 MOTION Submitting January 2013 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 5/3/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 4/17/13.(mmi) (Entered: 04/17/2013)

04/19/2013 10276 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10260 MOTION Submitting February 2013 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 5/6/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 4/18/13.(mmi) (Entered: 04/19/2013)

04/23/2013

10277

RESPONSE to Motion in Compliance regarding CHSC Funding filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10272 Motion In Compliance regarding continuing funding of CHSC filed by Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Lorenzo Villalba, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Johnny Colon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Johnny Rullan, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Alejandro Garcia−Padilla, Nestor Galarza, Carmen Feliciano, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres filed by All Plaintiffs. (Lausell−Recurt, Steven) (Entered: 04/23/2013)

04/29/2013 10278 ORDER granting 10273 Motion for Leave to File Spanish language documents Granted Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/29/13. (mmi) (Entered: 04/30/2013)

04/30/2013 10279 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY Invoice REPORT dated 4/23/13 by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 04/30/2013)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 484 of 513

04/30/2013

10280

ORDER re 10279 Dewberry Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days.Response Deadline due by 5/7/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 4/30/13.(mmi) (Entered: 04/30/2013)

05/01/2013 10281 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 16, 2013 to file First Status Report Addressing Implementation of the Settlement Accord filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Parties Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/17/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/01/2013)

05/02/2013

10282

MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/20/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A: Dr. James Austin's invoice for April 2013, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B: Dr. James Austin's First Status Report)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/02/2013)

05/08/2013

10283

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting March 2013 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/24/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix 2 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 4 Appendix 4 − Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez, # 5 Appendix 5 − Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez, # 6 Appendix 6 − Invoices by Fermin Arraiza Navas, # 7 Appendix 7 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt, # 8 Appendix 8 − Invoice by Servicios Juridicos)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/08/2013)

05/08/2013 10284 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10283) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/24/2013 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/08/2013)

05/10/2013 10285 ORDER granting 10284 Motion to Restrict Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 5/10/13. (mmi) (Entered: 05/10/2013)

05/10/2013 10286 ORDER granting 10281 Motion for Extension of Time to File status report Status Report due by 5/16/2013. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/10/13. (mmi) (Entered: 05/10/2013)

05/16/2013 10287 STATUS REPORT Addressing Implementation of the Settlement Accord by All Plaintiffs, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Alejandro Garcia−Padilla. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/16/2013)

05/20/2013 10288 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10279 Dewberry Report filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/20/13.(mmi) (Entered: 05/20/2013)

05/28/2013 10289 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10256 Motion submitting ; adopting Report and Recommendation 10274 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13. (mmi) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10290 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10260 Motion submitting ; adopting 10276 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13. (mmi) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10291 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10257 Motion submitting ; adopting 10275 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13. (mmi) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10292 ORDER Within 14 days, the defendant shall file a proposed budget for the work that Dr Austin intends to perform for the defendants during the next 24 monthsBudget Report due by 6/11/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13.(mmi) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10293 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY INVOICE REPORT dated 5/16/13 as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10294 ORDER re 10293 Dewberry Report Amy party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response Deadline due by

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 485 of 513

6/5/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13.(mmi) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10295 ***SELECTED PARTIES***KPMG Invoice REPORT as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Travel Invoice, # 2 Travel Receipts) (mmi) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/7/2013: # 3 Corrected Invoice) (mmi). (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10296 ORDER re 10295 KPMG Invoice Report Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by KPMG, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response Deadline due by 6/5/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13.(mmi) (Entered: 05/28/2013)

05/28/2013 10299 ORDER approving re 10263 Report filed by All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13.(mmi) (Entered: 05/30/2013)

05/29/2013 10297 ORDER for defendants to file within 14 days the certified translations of the attachments to 10272 Motion In Compliance regarding continuing funding of CHSC. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 6/12/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/2013.(ni) (Entered: 05/29/2013)

05/29/2013 10298 ORDER for parties to file within 14 days a revised staffing plan for the Correctional Medical Center, etc. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 6/12/2013. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/29/2013. (ni) (Entered: 05/29/2013)

05/30/2013

10300

ORDER re 10272 Motion In Compliance regarding continuing funding of CHSC Video Conference set for 6/20/2013 10:00 AM EST before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. The parties should also be prepared to discuss their efforts to settle the damages portion of this case.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 5/28/13.(mmi) (Entered: 05/30/2013)

06/05/2013 10301 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10242 Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 6/5/13.(mmi) (Entered: 06/05/2013)

06/12/2013 10303 ORDER: Parties to take notice that the Video Conference set for 6/20/2013 10:00 AM will be held in Courtroom 4 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/12/13.(gsr) (Entered: 06/12/2013)

06/12/2013 10304 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** Minute Order re: Order (docket entry 10301).(gsr) (Entered: 06/12/2013)

06/12/2013 10305 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10293 Dewberry Report as to Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/12/13.(mmi) (Entered: 06/12/2013)

06/12/2013 10306 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10295 KPMG Report, as to Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/12/13.(mmi) (Entered: 06/12/2013)

06/12/2013 10307 ***EX−PARTE***Ex Parte INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Hearing Scheduled filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/28/2013 (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 06/12/2013)

06/13/2013 10308 MOTION Requesting that June 13th Videoconference Be Held on an Ex−Parte Basis re 10301 Order, Set Hearings filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/1/2013 (Related document(s) 10301 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/13/2013)

06/13/2013 10309 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10308 Motion for 6/13/13 hearing to be held ex parte. Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 6/13/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/13/2013)

06/13/2013 10310 ***SELECTED PARTIES***Minute Entry for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty: Motion Hearing held on 6/13/2013 re 10242 MOTION Submitting Updated Litigation Plans for Pending Individual Cases. (Court Reporter FTR Courtroom # 4 Hato Rey.) (cr) (Entered: 06/13/2013)

06/13/2013 10311 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10242 MOTION Submitting Updated Litigation Plans for Pending Individual Cases re: 10228 Status Report filed by All

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 486 of 513

Plaintiffs Memorandum/Supplemental Filing Filing due by 6/27/2012.Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 6/13/13.(mmi) (Entered: 06/14/2013)

06/14/2013 10312 MOTION for Extension of Time until July 14, 2013 to file translations of documentssubmitted with Motion in Compliance with Order at Docket 10272 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/1/2013 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 06/14/2013)

06/17/2013 10313 STATUS REPORT Regarding Staffing Pattern of the CMC by All Plaintiffs, Defendant−All. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/17/2013)

06/17/2013 10314 MOTION requesting Order Rescheduling Hearing set for June 20, 2013 to be held in the afternoon filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/5/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 06/17/2013)

06/17/2013 10315 STATUS REPORT on the Conversations Held by the Parties Regarding the Damages Issue by All Plaintiffs, Defendant−All. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/17/2013)

06/18/2013 10316 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting 10307 INFORMATIVE motion Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/18/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/18/2013)

06/18/2013 10317 ORDER granting 10314 Motion requesting Order Motion Hearing 10272 Motion re: continuing funds and damages reset for 6/20/2013 01:00 PM before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/18/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/18/2013)

06/18/2013

10318

INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Assessed but Uncollected Fines filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/5/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit June 11, 2013 Letter from Judge Cordero, # 2 Exhibit June 18, 2013 Defendants Response to Judge Cordero's letter, # 3 Exhibit Revised Stipulation, # 4 Exhibit Docket 7791, # 5 Exhibit Docket 9888, # 6 Exhibit Docket 10272)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 06/18/2013)

06/19/2013 10319 ORDER: the parties should take notice, Video Conference set for 6/20/2013 10:00 AM is RESET for 6/20/2013 at 1:00 PM in Courtroom 4 before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/19/2013.(amr) (Entered: 06/19/2013)

06/20/2013 10320 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Status Conference held on 6/20/2013. Defendant shall file within 14 days of the conclusion of the Legislation a status report. (Court Reporter Amy Walker.) (amr) (Entered: 06/21/2013)

06/20/2013 10321 DISREGARD−FILED IN ERROR: ORDER approving re 10138 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by the parties Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/20/13.(mmi) Modified on 6/25/2013 (mmi). (Entered: 06/21/2013)

06/20/2013 10322 ORDER granting 10212 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz terminated Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/20/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/25/2013)

06/20/2013 10323 ORDER denying without prejudice 10272 Motion In Compliance regarding continuing funding of CHSC Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/20/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/25/2013)

06/20/2013 10324 ORDER finding as moot 10312 Motion for Extension of Time to File translation of documents Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/20/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/25/2013)

06/25/2013 10325 ORDER granting 10282 Motion for Disbursement of Funds for Dr. Austin. The Clerk shall disburse the funds. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/25/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/25/2013)

06/26/2013 10326 First MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney as to Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz filed by Carlos R. Iguina−Oharriz on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/12/2013 (Iguina−Oharriz, Carlos) (Entered: 06/26/2013)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 487 of 513

06/26/2013 10327 ORDER denying as moot 10326 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 6/26/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/26/2013)

06/27/2013 10328 ***EX−PARTE*** Motion In Compliance filed by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/15/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix)(Lausell−Recurt, Steven) (Entered: 06/27/2013)

06/27/2013 10329 MOTION to Restrict Document filed by Steven P. Lausell−Recurt on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/15/2013 (Lausell−Recurt, Steven) (Entered: 06/27/2013)

06/27/2013 10330 ORDER granting 10329 Motion to Restrict Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 6/27/13. (mmi) (Entered: 06/28/2013)

07/03/2013

10331

***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10328 Motion In Compliance filed by Jesus Ramos−Cedeno, Salvador Borta−Lebron, Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez, All Plaintiffs, Roman Miguel Sarriera, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, 10283 MOTION Submitting March 2013 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 7/22/2013Signed by Magistrate Judge Landya McCafferty on 7/3/13.(mmi) (Entered: 07/05/2013)

07/08/2013 10332 OBJECTION to Report and Recommendation filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10331 Report and Recommendation, filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 07/08/2013)

07/15/2013 10333 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting in part 10283 Motion submitting ; adopting 10331 Report and Recommendation Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/15/13. (mmi) (Entered: 07/15/2013)

07/16/2013 10334 ORDER If the defendants intend to seek funds from the court for Dr. Austin's services in the future, a proposed budget for Dr. Austin's services must be filed on or before July 29, 2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 7/16/13.(mmi) (Entered: 07/16/2013)

07/30/2013

10335

MOTION Submitting Dr. James Austin proposed Work Plan and Budget for Consulting Services filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/15/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Dr. austin Proposed Work Plan and Budget)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 07/30/2013)

07/31/2013 10336 INFORMATIVE Motion (in the Spanish language) regarding Civil Rights Violations filed by Various Inmates from the Guayama Anex 296 Regional Detention Center. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/16/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 08/02/2013)

08/08/2013 10337 INFORMATIVE Motion (in the Spanish language) regarding Civil Rights Violations filed by the Committee on Legal Issues, Ponce Penal Institution. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/26/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 08/12/2013)

08/15/2013 10338 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY REPORT#1014298 as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 08/15/2013)

08/15/2013 10339 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10338 Dewberry Report Any objection to the Dewberry Report shall be filed within seven days. Response Deadline due by 8/22/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/15/2013.(mmi) (Entered: 08/15/2013)

08/21/2013

10340

INFORMATIVE Motion (in the Spanish language) regarding Civil Rights Violations filed by Ernesto Vega Lugo on behalf of various inmates from the IC Guerrero, Aguadilla 8C−II Detention Center. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/6/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit I, # 2 Exhibit II, # 3 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 08/21/2013)

08/21/2013 10341 ORDER granting 10335 Motion submitting Dr. Austin's work plan and budget for consulting services The proposed budget is approved. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/21/13. (mmi) (Entered: 08/21/2013)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 488 of 513

08/29/2013

10342

ORDER re 10340 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Civil Rights Violations filed by Ernesto Vega Lugo on behalf of various inmates from the IC Guerrero, Aguadilla 8C−II Detention Center., 10336 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Civil Rights Violations filed by Carlos Morales−Feliciano, 10337 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Civil Rights Violations filed by All Plaintiffs The court cannot accept documents that are not filed in the English language. The filer shall file an English language translation of the document within 14 days or the filing shall be stricken.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 8/29/13.(mmi) (Entered: 08/29/2013)

09/03/2013 10343 NOTICE of Extended Medical Leave by Atty. Carlos Del Valle Cruz by All Defendants (Del−Valle−Cruz, Carlos) (Entered: 09/03/2013)

09/05/2013 10344 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10338 Dewberry Report filed as to Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/5/13.(mmi) (Entered: 09/05/2013)

09/10/2013 10345 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/4th Quarter Budget Request as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 09/10/2013)

09/10/2013

10346

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10345 Report/4th Quarter Budget as to Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the fourth quarter budget request submitted by CHSC, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response to Motion Deadline due by 9/17/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/10/13.(mmi) (Entered: 09/10/2013)

09/10/2013 10347 ORDER Video Conference/Status Conference set for 9/23/2013 01:30 PM before Judge Paul J Barbadoro. Topics of discussion include: budget issues; settlement negotiations and prisoner filings. Signed by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 9/10/13.(mmi) (Entered: 09/10/2013)

09/12/2013 10348 NOTICE of Appearance by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of All Defendants (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 09/12/2013)

09/16/2013

10349

MOTION (filed in the Spanish language) requesting that a copy of the Spanish version of the settlement accord be provided to inmates at the Guayama Prison library filed by Angel L. Rodriguez−Cruz, pro−se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/3/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 09/16/2013)

09/20/2013 10350 Minute Entry: The Video Conference set for 9/23/2013 at 1:30 PM before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro will be held in COURTROOM #1. Signed by Clerk on 9/20/2013.(ct) (Entered: 09/20/2013)

09/23/2013

10351

Minute for Proceedings held before Judge Paul J Barbadoro: Status/Video Conference held on 9/23/2013. Letters from inmates received in the Spanish language shall be referred to the plaintiffs' attorney instead of docketing them into ECF. (Court Reporter Zulma Ruiz.)Hearing set for 01:30.Hearing held at 01:48.Hearing ended at 02:37. (ct) Modified on 6/2/2014 to add docket text (cm). (Entered: 09/27/2013)

10/09/2013 10352 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10345 Report filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs The budget request is approved. The funds shall be disbursedSigned by Judge Paul J Barbadoro on 10/9/13.(mmi) (Entered: 10/09/2013)

10/17/2013 10353 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/1st Quarter FY 2014 Budget Request as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Memorial 2014 1st Quarter Request) (mmi) (Entered: 10/17/2013)

10/17/2013

10354

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10353 Report/1st Quarter Budget filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the first quarter budget request submitted by CHSC, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days.Response Deadline due by 10/24/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 10/17/13.(mmi) (Entered: 10/17/2013)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 489 of 513

10/17/2013 10355 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/PROPOSED FY 2014 BUDGET filed by CHSC as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 10/17/2013)

10/17/2013

10356

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10355 Report filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation, as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Any party that objects to the proposed 2014 FY budget request submitted by CHSC, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response Deadline due by 10/24/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 10/17/13.(mmi) (Entered: 10/17/2013)

10/24/2013 10357 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re: review by KPMGResponse Deadline due by 11/7/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 10/23/13.(mmi) (Entered: 10/24/2013)

11/07/2013

10358

MOTION for Disbursement of Funds FOR DR. JAMES AUSTIN CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/25/2013 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A: Invoice, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B: Invoice, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit C: Invoice, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit D: Report)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 11/07/2013)

11/12/2013 10359 ***SELECTED PARTIES***REPORT/Dewberry 11/11/13 Invoice as to All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All. (mmi) (Entered: 11/13/2013)

11/12/2013

10360

ORDER re 10359 Report Dewberry Invoice Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response Deadline due by 11/20/2013.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/12/13.(mmi) (Entered: 11/13/2013)

11/20/2013 10361 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10357 Order, The proposal is approved.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/20/13.(mmi) (Entered: 11/20/2013)

11/26/2013 10362 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10359 Dewberry Report as to Correctional Health Services, all plaintiffs, all defendants. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/27/13.(mmi) (Entered: 11/27/2013)

12/06/2013 10363 ORDER, Status VideoConference set for 12/13/2013 01:00 PM EST in a Courtroom before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/6/13.(mmi) (Entered: 12/06/2013)

12/10/2013 10364 ORDER granting 10358 Motion for Disbursement of Funds Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/10/13. (mmi) (Entered: 12/10/2013)

12/11/2013 10365 Minute Entry: Parties are advised that the Status Video Conference set for 12/13/2013 at 1:00 PM (EST) before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro will be held in Courtroom #1. (Clerk)(ct) (Entered: 12/11/2013)

12/13/2013 10366 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10353 Report filed by Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs The Court approved the 1st quarter request. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/13/13.(mmi) (Entered: 12/13/2013)

12/13/2013 10367 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro:Video Conference held on 12/13/2013. (Court Reporter Joe Reynosa.) (sr) (Entered: 12/17/2013)

01/08/2014 10368 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY REPORT #1059009 as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) Modified on 1/8/2014 to indicate the correct report (mmi). (Entered: 01/08/2014)

01/08/2014

10369

ORDER re 10368 DEWBERRY Report as to Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response to Motion Deadline due by 1/15/2014.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/8/14.(mmi) Modified on 1/8/2014 (mmi). Modified on 1/9/2014 (mmi). (Entered: 01/08/2014)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 490 of 513

01/17/2014 10370 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds FOR DR. JAMES AUSTIN CONSULTING SERVICES filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/3/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit December 2013 Invoice)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 01/17/2014)

01/23/2014 10371 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10368 Dewberry Report The invoice is approved, the clerk of court shall disburse the funds. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/23/14.(mmi) (Entered: 01/23/2014)

01/31/2014 10372 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re: KPMG Response to Motion Deadline due by 2/10/2014.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/31/14.(mmi) (Entered: 02/03/2014)

01/31/2014 10373 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re: invoices, Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/1/2014.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/31/14.(mmi) (Entered: 02/03/2014)

01/31/2014 10374 ORDER The parties shall file their second joint status report on the implementation of the settlement agreement.Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/1/2014.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/31/14.(mmi) (Entered: 02/04/2014)

02/06/2014 10375 ORDER granting 10370 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. The clerk shall disburse the funds. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/6/14. (mmi) (Entered: 02/07/2014)

02/14/2014 10376 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER re 10372 The proposal is approved.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/14/14.(mmi) (Entered: 02/14/2014)

03/03/2014 10377 STATUS REPORT on the Implementation of the Settlement Accord by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − December 13, 2013 Letter to Defendants' Counsel) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/03/2014)

03/18/2014 10378 ***SELECTED PARTIES***DEWBERRY Invoice REPORT as to Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs, Correctional Health Services Corporation. (mmi) (Entered: 03/18/2014)

03/18/2014

10379

ORDER re 10378 Dewberry Report as to Correctional Health Services Corporation, Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Any party that objects to the proposed payment of the invoice submitted by Dewberry Architects, a copy of which has been filed under seal, shall file an objection within 7 days. Response to Motion Deadline due by 3/28/2014.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/18/14.(mmi) (Entered: 03/18/2014)

03/20/2014 10380 ORDER Setting Hearing Hearing set for 4/10/2014 10:00 AM EST before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro regarding 10377 Status Report.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/20/14. (with a court reporter)(mmi) (Entered: 03/21/2014)

04/03/2014 10381 Minute Entry re 10380 Order Setting Hearing on Motion. The Motion Hearing set for 4/10/2014 10:00 AM EST will be held at the 5th floor courtroom − Old San Juan Courthouse before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.(Clerk)(ct) (Entered: 04/03/2014)

04/04/2014 10382 **SELECTED PARTIES**ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: DE#10378, The Clerk shall disburse the funds. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 4/4/2014.(cm) Modified on 4/7/2014 to add docket entry restriction (cm) (Entered: 04/07/2014)

04/10/2014 10383 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro: Video Conference held on 4/10/2014. (Court Reporter EvilysCarrion.) (amr) (Entered: 04/17/2014)

04/21/2014

Set Deadlines/Hearings: TELEPHONE CONFERENCE re: Status of the Correctional Medical Center set for 4/28/2014 11:00 AM before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 4/21/2014.(cm) (Entered: 04/21/2014)

04/30/2014 10384 ***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Updated and Revised Litigation Plan for Individual Case No. 16 re: 10331 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10328

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 491 of 513

Motion In Compliance filed by Jesus Ramos−Cedeno, Salvador Borta−Lebron, Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez, All Plaintiffs, Roman Miguel Sarriera, Carlos Morales−Feliciano, 10283 MOTION Submitting 10331 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10385 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket No. 10384) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10386

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt and Servicios Juridicos, Inc. filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix April Invoices, # 2 Appendix May Invoices, # 3 Appendix June Invoices, # 4 Appendix July Invoices, # 5 Appendix August Invoices, # 6 Appendix September Invoices, # 7 Appendix October Invoices, # 8 Appendix November Invoices, # 9 Appendix December Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10387 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket No. 10386) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10388 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle on behalf of All Defendants (Feldstein−Del Valle, Joseph) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10389

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez. filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix April Invoices, # 2 Appendix May Invoices, # 3 Appendix June Invoices, # 4 Appendix July Invoices, # 5 Appendix August Invoices, # 6 Appendix September Invoices, # 7 Appendix October Invoices, # 8 Appendix November Invoices, # 9 Appendix December Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10390 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 1389) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10391 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10391) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10392

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix April Invoices, # 2 Appendix May Invoices, # 3 Appendix June Invoices, # 4 Appendix July Invoices, # 5 Appendix August Invoices, # 6 Appendix September Invoices, # 7 Appendix October Invoices, # 8 Appendix December Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10393 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10392) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10394

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix April−May Invoices, # 2 Appendix June Invoices, # 3 Appendix July Invoices, # 4 Appendix November Invoice, # 5 Appendix December Invoice)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10395 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10394) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10396 ***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Fermin Arraiza Navas filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix April Invoice, # 2 Appendix May Invoice, # 3 Appendix June Invoice, # 4 Appendix

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 492 of 513

September−December Invoice)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10397 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10396) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10398

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Ivonne Olmo Rios filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix April Invoice, # 2 Appendix June Invoice)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10399 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10398) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10400

***EX−PARTE***Supplemental MOTION Submitting Additional Outstanding 2013 Invoices by Lilian Miranda Rodriguez re: 10394 MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Additional Invoices)(Related document(s) 10394 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10401 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10400) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10402

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting January 2014 Invoices by Plaintiffs' Counsel filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt and Servicios Juridicos, # 3 Appendix Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez, # 4 Appendix Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez, # 5 Appendix Invoice by Fermin Arraiza Navas)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10403 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10402) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014

10404

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting February 2014 Invoices by Plaintiffs' Counsel filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt and Servicios Juridicos, # 3 Appendix Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez, # 4 Appendix Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez, # 5 Appendix Invoice by Ivonne Olmo Rios)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10405 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10404) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/16/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

04/30/2014 10406 STATUS REPORT on Pending Individual Cases by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/30/2014)

05/01/2014 10407 MOTION for Leave to File Document − Outstanding 2013 Invoices for Guillermo Ramos Luina filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/19/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/01/2014)

05/01/2014

10408

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Oustanding 2013 Invoices by Guillermo Ramos Luina filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/19/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix April Invoice, # 2 Appendix May Invoice, # 3 Appendix June Invoice, # 4 Appendix July Invoice, # 5 Appendix August Invoice, # 6 Appendix September Invoice, # 7 Appendix October Invoice, # 8 Appendix November Invoice, # 9 Appendix December Invoice)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/01/2014)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 493 of 513

05/01/2014 10409 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10408) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/19/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/01/2014)

05/05/2014 10410 ORDER : The Parties shall file a Joint Status Report on or before June 1, 2014, re 10199 Order, Status Report due by 6/1/2014. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/2/2014.(cm) (Entered: 05/05/2014)

05/05/2014

10411

**CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER Setting Deadlines re reimbursement of travel expenses for Francis McGovern. Objections to Proposed Payment Deadline due by 5/12/2014. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/2/2014.(cm) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/24/2014: # 1 Invoice for January Trip to Puerto Rico, # 2 Invoice for February Trip to Puerto Rico) (cm). (Entered: 05/05/2014)

06/02/2014 10412 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 12, 2014 to file joint status report filed by Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle on behalf of All Parties Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/19/2014 (Feldstein−Del Valle, Joseph) (Entered: 06/02/2014)

06/10/2014

10413

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting March 2014 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/27/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix 2 − Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez, # 4 Appendix 4 − Invoices by Ivonne Olmo, # 5 Appendix 5 − Invoices by Meba Diaz Ramirez, # 6 Appendix 6 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt and Servicios Juridicos, Inc.)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/10/2014)

06/10/2014

10414

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting April 2014 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/27/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Invoice by Guillermo Ramos Luina, # 2 Appendix 2 Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez, # 3 Appendix 3 − Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt and Servicios Juridicos, Inc.)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/10/2014)

06/10/2014 10415 MOTION to Restrict Document (Dockets 10413 and 10414) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/27/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/10/2014)

06/12/2014 10416 Final MOTION for Extension of Time until June 23, 2014 to file Joint Status Report filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Parties Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/30/2014 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/12/2014)

06/16/2014 10417 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds re: DE# 10411 Order. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 6/13/2014.(cm) (Entered: 06/16/2014)

06/23/2014 10418 STATUS REPORT on Compliance with Settlement Accord by All Plaintiffs, Defendant−All. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Table with Points of Contention) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 06/23/2014)

09/10/2014 10420 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding change in menu filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 9/29/2014. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(ni) (Entered: 09/19/2014)

09/15/2014

10419

**WITHDRAWN−SEE DE#10445 ORDER** MOTION to Amend Settlement Accord re 10195 Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs filed by Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/2/2014 (Related document(s) 10195 ) (Feldstein−Del Valle, Joseph) Modified on 12/29/2014 (cm). (Entered: 09/15/2014)

09/19/2014 10421 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER, re reimbursement of travel expenses for Francis McGovern Objections to Proposed Payment Deadline due by 9/29/14.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/19/14.(mmi) (Entered: 09/22/2014)

09/22/2014 10422 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER granting in part and denying in part re: 10394 MOTION Submitting Outstanding 2013 Invoices by Lillian Miranda Rodriguez filed by All Plaintiffs, 10408 MOTION Submitting Outstanding 2013

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 494 of 513

Invoices by Guillermo Ramos Luina filed by All Plaintiffs, 10396 MOTION Submitting Outstanding 2013 Invoices by Fermin Arraiza Navas filed by All Plaintiffs, 10389 MOTION Submitting Outstanding 2013 Invoices by Melba Diaz Ramirez. filed by All Plaintiffs, 10398 MOTION Submitting Outstanding 2013 Invoices by Ivonne Olmo Rios filed by All Plaintiffs, 10392 MOTION Submitting Outstanding 2013 Invoices by Jose Roque Velazquez filed by All Plaintiffs, 10386 MOTION Submitting Outstanding 2013 Invoices by Steven Lausell Recurt and Servicios Juridicos, Inc. filed by All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/22/14.(mmi) (Entered: 09/24/2014)

09/22/2014

10423

***SELECTED PARTIES***PER ORDER #10422 Granting: re 10393 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10392) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10401 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10400) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10409 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10408) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10407 MOTION for Leave to File Document − Outstanding 2013 Invoices for Guillermo Ramos Luina filed by All Plaintiffs,denying as moot 10391 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10391) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10397 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10396) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10399 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10398) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10395 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10394) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10385 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket No. 10384) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10390 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 1389) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10387 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket No. 10386) filed by All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/22/14.(mmi) (Entered: 09/24/2014)

09/25/2014

10424

ORDER granting 10415 MOTION to Restrict Document (Dockets 10413 and 10414) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10405 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10404) filed by All Plaintiffs, 10403 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10402) filed by All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/14.(mmi) (Entered: 09/26/2014)

09/25/2014 10425 ORDER denying without prejudice 10420 INFORMATIVE motion regarding change in menu. I refer this motion to plaintiffs' counsel for whatever further action may be appropriate. The motion is denied without prejudice Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/14. (mmi) (Entered: 09/26/2014)

09/25/2014 10426 ORDER granting 10416 Final MOTION for Extension of Time until June 23, 2014 to file Joint Status Report filed by the parties and 10412 MOTION for Extension of Time until June 12, 2014 to file Joint Status Report filed by the parties Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/14.(mmi) (Entered: 09/26/2014)

09/29/2014

10427

MOTION for Extension of Time until October 9, 2004 to File Response/Reply as to 10419 MOTION to Amend Settlement Accord re 10195 Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs filed by Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Lorenzo Villalba, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Johnny Colon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Johnny Rullan, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Alejandro Garcia−Padilla, Nestor Galarza, Carmen Feliciano, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/17/2014 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Official Translation of Puerto Rico Act 135−2004)(Related document(s) 10419 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 09/29/2014)

10/03/2014

10428

ORDER granting 10427 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply re 10419 MOTION to Amend Settlement Accord re 10195 Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/9/2014 Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 10/3/14. (mmi) (Entered: 10/03/2014)

10/06/2014

Set Hearings Status Conference set for 10/24/2014 09:30 AM EST before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 10/6/14.(mmi) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 495 of 513

10/06/2014)

10/09/2014 10429 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS re 10421 Order, Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 10/9/14.(mmi) (Entered: 10/09/2014)

10/09/2014

10430

RESPONSE in Opposition to Motion filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10419 MOTION to Amend Settlement Accord re 10195 Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs filed by Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Lorenzo Villalba, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Johnny Colon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Johnny Rullan, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Alejandro Garcia−Padilla, Nestor Galarza, Carmen Feliciano, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres filed by All Plaintiffs. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Official Translation of Puerto Rico Act 135−2004)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 10/09/2014)

10/14/2014 10431 ORDER re 10422 Order, No objections have been filed, the Clerk is directed to disburse fees from the fine finds. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 10/14/14.(mmi) (Entered: 10/15/2014)

10/20/2014 10432 MINUTES: The Status Conference set for 10/24/2014 09:30 AM EST will take place in Courtroom 3 before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (Clerk)(ct) (Entered: 10/20/2014)

10/24/2014 10433 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro:Video Conference held on 10/24/2014. (Court Reporter Amy Walker.) (ab) (Entered: 10/28/2014)

10/29/2014

10434

ORDER for assignment of Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnston from the District of New Hampshire to perform all duties authorized within 28 U.S.C. Section 636(a)−(c) for the duration of this case. Signed by Chief Judge Aida M. Delgado−Colon from the District of Puerto Rico, and Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante from the District of New Hampshire on 10/27/2014.(cm) (Entered: 10/29/2014)

10/30/2014 10435 MEMORANDUM OF THE CLERK: Pursuant to the Referral Order issued by Chief Judge Aida M. Delgado−Colon and by Chief Judge Joseph N. Laplante on 10/29/14, entry #10434, this case hereby referred to Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnston. Signed by Clerk on 10/30/14. (li) (Entered: 10/30/2014)

12/01/2014 10436 ORDER, the defendants are ordered to file a status report on the meeting between Dr. Austin and the Secretary of Corrections. Status Report due by 12/10/2014.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/1/14.(mmi) Modified on 12/4/2014 to correct deadline (cm). (Entered: 12/03/2014)

12/04/2014 10438 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10402 MOTION Submitting January 2014 Invoices by Plaintiffs' Counsel filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2014Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 12/4/14.(mmi) (Entered: 12/05/2014)

12/04/2014 10439 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10404 MOTION Submitting February 2014 Invoices by Plaintiffs' Counsel filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2014Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 12/4/14.(mmi) (Entered: 12/05/2014)

12/05/2014 10437 Consent MOTION Requesting Extension of the Settlement Accord re 10196 Order filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/22/2014 (Related document(s) 10196 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 12/05/2014)

12/05/2014 10440 ORDER granting 10437 Motion to extended the effectiveness of the Settlement Accord up to and including December 31, 2014 Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/5/14. (mmi) (Entered: 12/05/2014)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 496 of 513

12/05/2014 10441 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10413 MOTION Submitting March 2014 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2014Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 12/5/14.(mmi) (Entered: 12/08/2014)

12/05/2014 10442 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10414 MOTION Submitting April 2014 Invoices filed by All Plaintiffs Objections to R&R due by 12/22/2014Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 12/5/14.(mmi) (Entered: 12/08/2014)

12/19/2014 10443 Joint NOTICE of Settlement by Defendant−All (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 12/19/2014)

12/19/2014

10444

MOTION to Withdraw Document re: 10419 MOTION to Amend Settlement Accord re 10195 Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs filed by Zoraida Buxo, Julio Garcia−Garcia, Sila M. Calderon, Lorenzo Villalba, Jose E. Soler−Zapata, Miguel Pereira Castillo, Johnny Colon, Zulma Martinez−de−Cone, Heriberto Acevedo, Julian O. McConnie, Jose L. Cruz−Ramos, Enrique Vazquez−Quintana, Juanita Gomez, Aixa Mariano, Jose A. Nunez−Lopez, Luis Fortuno−Burset, Julio Acevedo−Asencio, Johnny Rullan, Enrique Garcia−Garcia, Anibal Acevedo Vila, Irba Cruz de Batista, Victor A. Vazquez−Gonzalez, Juan Del−Valle−Lopez, Rosa Perez Perdomo, Mercedes Otero−de−Ramos, Carlos Romero−Barcelo, Judith Matias−De−Leon, Pedro J. Rossello−Gonzalez, Alejandro Garcia−Padilla, Nestor Galarza, Carmen Feliciano, Felix Rodriguez−Pinero, Isabel Suliveres filed by Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/8/2015 (Related document(s) 10419 ) (Feldstein−Del Valle, Joseph) (Entered: 12/19/2014)

12/19/2014 10445 ORDER granting 10444 Motion to Withdraw Document 10419 MOTION to Amend Settlement Accord re 10195 Settlement Agreement filed by Defendant−All, All Plaintiffs Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/19/14. (mmi) (Entered: 12/22/2014)

01/13/2015 10446 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 10442 granting 10414 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/13/15. (mmi) (Entered: 01/13/2015)

01/13/2015 10447 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER adopting 10441 Report and Recommendation granting 10413 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/13/15. (mmi) (Entered: 01/13/2015)

01/13/2015 10448 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 10439 granting 10404 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/13/15. (mmi) (Entered: 01/13/2015)

01/13/2015 10449 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 10438 granting 10402 Motion submitting Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/13/15. (mmi) (Entered: 01/13/2015)

01/13/2015 10450 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 1/31/2015 re: invoices.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/13/15.(mmi) (Entered: 01/13/2015)

01/28/2015 10451 ORDER re 10443 Notice of Settlement Motions due by 1/30/2015 Follow Up Deadline due by 2/13/2015. Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2015 09:00 AM in a Courtroom in Puerto Rico before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/28/15.(mmi) (Entered: 01/28/2015)

01/30/2015

10452

Joint MOTION Requesting Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/17/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Final Settlement Proposal, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Proposed Class Notice)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/30/2015)

01/30/2015 10453 MOTION for Extension of Time until February 10, 2015 to file Pending 2014 Invoices filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/17/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/30/2015)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 497 of 513

02/04/2015 10454 ORDER granting 10453 Motion for Extension of Time to File. No further extensions will be allowed. Invoices due by 2/10/2015. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/3/2015. (cm) (Entered: 02/04/2015)

02/04/2015

10455

***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10384 MOTION Submitting Updated and Revised Litigation Plan for Individual Case No. 16, re: 10331 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10328 Motion In Compliance filed by Jesus Ramos−Cedeno, Salvador Borta−Lebron, Carlos V. Garcia−Gutier, filed by All Plaintiffs. Additional related dockets: 10389 , 10394 , 10400 , 10402 and 10414 . Objections to R&R due by 2/23/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 2/3/2015.(cm) (Entered: 02/04/2015)

02/05/2015

***SELECTED PARTIES***Correction to Deadlines re: 10455 Report and Recommendation. Objections to R&R due by 2/18/2015 (within fourteen days) Signed by Clerk. (cm) (Entered: 02/05/2015)

02/10/2015 10456 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Servicios Juridicos, Inc. filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Outstanding 2014 Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/10/2015)

02/10/2015

10457

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Melba Diaz Ramirez filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix May 2014 Invoices, # 2 Appendix June 2014 Invoices, # 3 Appendix July 2014 Invoices, # 4 Appendix August 2014 Invoices, # 5 Appendix September 2014 Invoices, # 6 Appendix October 2014 Invoices, # 7 Appendix November 2014 Invoices, # 8 Appendix December 2014 Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/10/2015)

02/10/2015

10458

***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Lillian Miranda Rodriguez filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix June 2014 Invoices, # 2 Appendix August 2014 Invoices, # 3 Appendix December 2014 Invoices)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/10/2015)

02/10/2015

10459

MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Guillermo Ramos Luia filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 2/27/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix May 2014 Invoice, # 2 Appendix June 2014 Invoice, # 3 Appendix July−September 2014 Invoice, # 4 Appendix October 2014 Invoice, # 5 Appendix November 2014 Invoice)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/10/2015)

02/11/2015 10460 MOTION to Restrict Document (Dockets No. 10457, 10458, and 10459) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/2/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/11/2015)

02/12/2015 10461 Minute Entry: By order of the Court, the Motion Hearing set for 2/17/2015 09:00 AM will be held in Courtroom 11 (4th floor of the Federal Building−Chardon Ave.) before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (Clerk)(ct) (Entered: 02/12/2015)

02/13/2015 10462 ORDER granting 10460 Motion to Restrict. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/13/2015. (cm) (Entered: 02/13/2015)

02/13/2015 10463 ***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting December 1014 Invoice for Guillermo Ramos Luina filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/2/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix December 2014 Invoice)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/13/2015)

02/13/2015 10464 MOTION to Restrict Document (Docket 10463) filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/2/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/13/2015)

02/17/2015 10467 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro:Motion Hearing held on 2/17/2015 re 10452 Joint MOTION Requesting Preliminary Approval of Settlement filed by All Plaintiffs. (Court Reporter −DCR.) (yr) (Entered: 02/26/2015)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 498 of 513

02/23/2015

10465

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER APPROVING 10455 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ; ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds; granting 10384 ***EX−PARTE*** MOTION Submitting Updated and Revised Litigation Plan for Individual Case No. 16 re: 10331 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10328 Motion In Compliance filed by Jesus Ramos−Cedeno, Salvador Borta−Lebron, Carlos V. Garcia−Gutierrez, All Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/23/2015.(cm) (Entered: 02/23/2015)

02/23/2015 10466 ORDER granting 10464 Motion to Restrict. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/23/2015. (cm) (Entered: 02/23/2015)

02/27/2015 10468 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10456 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Servicios Juridicos, Inc. filed by All Plaintiffs. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2015Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 2/27/2015.(cm) (Entered: 02/27/2015)

02/27/2015 10469 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10457 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Melba Diaz Ramirez filed by All Plaintiffs. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2015Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 2/27/2015.(cm) (Entered: 02/27/2015)

02/27/2015 10470 ***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10458 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Lillian Miranda Rodriguez filed by All Plaintiffs. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2015Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 2/27/2015.(cm) (Entered: 02/27/2015)

02/27/2015

10471

***SELECTED PARTIES*** REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10463 MOTION Submitting December 1014 Invoice for Guillermo Ramos Luina filed by All Plaintiffs, 10459 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Guillermo Ramos Luia filed by All Plaintiffs. Objections to R&R due by 3/16/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Andrea K. Johnstone on 2/27/2015.(cm) (Entered: 02/27/2015)

03/02/2015 10472 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER Setting Deadline. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/30/2015. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/2/2015.(cm) (Entered: 03/02/2015)

03/02/2015 10473 ORDER re 10452 Joint MOTION Requesting Preliminary Approval of Settlement filed by All Parties. Parties shall either file an amended settlement agreement or a notice of intent not to file an amended settlement agreement by 3/13/2015. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/2/2015.(cm) (Entered: 03/02/2015)

03/12/2015 10474 MOTION for Extension of Time until March 23, 2015 to file Amended Settlement Agreement documents for approval filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/30/2015 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/12/2015)

03/16/2015 10475 ORDER granting 10474 Motion for Extension of Time to File. Amended Settlement Agreement document Deadline due by 3/23/2015. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/16/2015. (cm) (Entered: 03/16/2015)

03/18/2015 10476 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding violations to the 2012 Settlement Agreement filed by Ramon De−Jesus Cuevas, Member of Friends and Relatives of Inmates, pro−se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/6/2015. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(cm) (Entered: 03/18/2015)

03/24/2015 10477 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, re 10468 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10456 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Servicios Juridicos, Inc., filed by All Plaintiffs, Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/23/2015.(cm) (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/24/2015 10478 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, re: 10469 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10457 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Melba Diaz Ramirez filed by All Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/23/2015.(cm) (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/24/2015 10479 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, re: 10470 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10458 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Lillian Miranda Rodriguez filed by All Plaintiffs. Signed

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 499 of 513

by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/23/2015.(cm) (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/24/2015

10480

***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds, re: 10471 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re 10463 MOTION Submitting December 1014 Invoice for Guillermo Ramos Luina filed by All Plaintiffs, 10459 MOTION Submitting 2014 Outstanding Invoices for Guillermo Ramos Luia filed by All Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/23/2015.(cm) Modified on 3/24/2015 to add docket entry restriction. (Entered: 03/24/2015)

03/25/2015 10481 Final MOTION for Extension of Time until March 30, 2015 to file Amended Settlement Proposal filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/13/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/25/2015)

03/25/2015 10482 ORDER granting 10481 Motion for Extension of Time to File Amended Settlement Proposal. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/30/2015. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/25/2015. (cm) (Entered: 03/25/2015)

03/30/2015

10483

Joint MOTION Submitting Amended Private Settlement and Benefits Proposal and Revised Notice to Class re: 10452 Joint MOTION Requesting Preliminary Approval of Settlement filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/16/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Amended Private Settlement and Benefits Proposal, # 2 Exhibit 2 − Revised Notice to Class)(Related document(s) 10452 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/30/2015)

05/04/2015 10484 ***SELECTED PARTIES***ORDER Setting Deadline to comply re 10472 Order, Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 5/18/2015. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/4/2015.(cm) (Entered: 05/04/2015)

05/05/2015 10485 ORDER granting 10483 Motion submitting Amended Private Settlement Proposal. Final Approval Hearing on the proposed settlement is set for 10/2/2015 09:00 AM before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/5/2015. (cm) (Entered: 05/05/2015)

05/18/2015 10486 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 26, 2015 to file Proposed Budgets and Cost Estimates filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/4/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/18/2015)

05/21/2015 10487 ORDER granting 10486 Motion for Extension of Time to File until 5/26/15 to File Proposed Budgets and Cost Estimates. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/21/15. (su) (Entered: 05/21/2015)

05/26/2015 10488 Motion In Compliance filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/12/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/26/2015)

05/27/2015 10489 MOTION for extension of time until 5/29/31 to submitt Dr. Austin's estimate of costs filed by Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/15/2015 (Feldstein−Del Valle, Joseph) (Entered: 05/27/2015)

05/29/2015 10490 Motion In Compliance with the May 4th Order filed by Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/15/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit estimate of costs)(Feldstein−Del Valle, Joseph) (Entered: 05/29/2015)

06/17/2015 10491 MOTION requesting Order filed by Mariano Maldonado, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 06/23/2015)

06/24/2015 10492 ORDER re 10491 MOTION requesting Order filed by inmate Mariano Maldonado, pro se. The plaintiffs and the defendant shall respond to the motion within 14 days.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 6/24/15.(su) (Entered: 06/24/2015)

07/07/2015 10493 LETTER/MOTION requesting Copy in the English Version of section No. 7 of the Inmates Classification Manual No. 6067 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/24/2015 (Attachments: # 1

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 500 of 513
Envelope) (nat) (Entered: 07/08/2015)
07/17/2015 10494 Motion In Compliance with Docket No. 10492 filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/3/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 07/17/2015)
07/21/2015 10495 Motion In Compliance filed by Joseph G. Feldstein−Del Valle on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/7/2015 (Feldstein−Del Valle, Joseph) (Entered: 07/21/2015)
07/21/2015 10496 INFORMATIVE Letter/Motion regarding defendant's non compliance filed by Ramon De−Jesus Cuevas, pro se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/7/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit, # 2 Envelope) (nat) (Entered: 07/22/2015)
08/04/2015 10497 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding status of Motion #10491 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 08/06/2015)
08/12/2015 10498 ORDER re 10488 Motion In Compliance. The budget for publication proposed by the plaintiffs is approved. As previousy ordered, the court will hold a final approval hearing on the proposed settlement on October 2, 2015 at 9:00 a.m. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 8/12/2015. (cm) s/c DQAs and Finance. (Entered: 08/12/2015)
08/24/2015 10499 MOTION requesting Order Regaring Imitation Cheese Served to inmate filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 08/28/2015)
09/08/2015 10502 OBJECTION to the Offer of Agreement and Impartial Proposal of the Complaint Class filed by Mario Jorge−Leon, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Doc. #10483−1 (in the Spanish Language), # 2 Exhibit 2 − Doc. #10483 (in the Spanish Language))(su) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
09/08/2015 10503 OBJECTION to the Offer of Agreement and Impartial Proposal of the Complaint Class filed by Felix M. Castro−Santiago, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Doc. #10483−1 (in the Spanish Language), # 2 Exhibit 2 − Doc. #10483 (in the Spanish Language))(su) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
09/09/2015 10504 MOTION requesting Order regarding visits through glasses and telephones filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1− Resolution of Reconsideration in Case GMA−1000−2000−13 (in the Spanish Language), # 2 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
09/09/2015 10508 OBJECTION to the Amended Agreement Offer filed by James T. Payne, pro se (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
09/10/2015 10505 MOTION for extension of time to retain counsel filed by Jorge Anibal Torres−Rodriguez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibits (in the Spanish Language), # 2 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
09/11/2015 10500 ORDER − Telephone Conference set for 9/18/2015 02:00 PM in Courtroom 3 before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.The only parties in this conference will be Plaintiffs' Counsels, Defense's Counsels, and Judge Charles Cordero. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/11/15.(su) (Entered: 09/11/2015)
09/12/2015 10501 MOTION for Leave to Appear on behalf of Mr. Torres Rodriguez, Jose Anibal filed by Carlos Rafael Rodriguez−Garcia on behalf of Jose Anibal Torres−Rodriguez. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/1/2015 (Rodriguez−Garcia, Carlos) Modified on 9/14/2015 filer(su). (Entered: 09/12/2015)
09/15/2015 10506 OBJECTION to the Amended Agreement Offer filed by Juan Carrion−Torres filed by Juan Carrion−Torres and 2 others inmates, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
09/15/2015 10507 OBJECTION to the Settlement Offer and Fair Hearing filed by Ruben Camacho−Muriel, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 09/15/2015)
09/17/2015 10509 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/5/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 09/17/2015)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 501 of 513

09/17/2015

10510

ORDER Telephone Conference set for tomorrow 9/18/15 at 2:00 PM will be held at Courtroom 3 at the HATO REY COURTHOUSE before judge Paul J. Barbadoro. The only parties in this conference will be Plaintiffs' Counsels, Defense's Counsels, and Judge Charles Cordero. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/17/15.(su) Modified on 9/17/2015 to add text(su). (Entered: 09/17/2015)

09/18/2015 10511 Minute of Proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro: Telephone Conference held on 9/18/2015. (Court Reporter NONE.)Hearing set for 02:00.Hearing held at 02:02.Hearing ended at 02:42. (ct) (Entered: 09/18/2015)

09/18/2015 10512 ENDORSED ORDER granting 10501 Motion for Leave to Appear by Attorney Carlos Rodriguez−Garcia. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/18/2015. (ct) (Entered: 09/18/2015)

09/18/2015 10513 ORDER granting 10509 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/18/2015. (ct) (Entered: 09/18/2015)

09/22/2015 10514 ORDER denying without prejudice 10496 Letter regarding prison conditions filed by Ramon de Jesus Cuevas, pro se. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/21/15. (su)(s/c to Mr. Cuevas) (Entered: 09/22/2015)

09/22/2015 10515 MOTION requesting Order regarding settlement filed by Rosado Jose Gonzalez, pro se.(su) (Entered: 09/25/2015)

09/23/2015 10516 LETTER Motion regarding status of his prior motion filed by James T. Payne, pro se. (su) (Entered: 09/25/2015)

09/25/2015 10517 ORDER denying 10476 INFORMATIVE motion filed by Ramon de Jesus Cuevas, pro se. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/15. (su)(s/c to Ramon de Jesus Cuevas) (Entered: 09/25/2015)

09/25/2015

10518

ORDER Denying 10491 MOTION references the use of powdered beverage mix in place of natural fruit juice and Noting 10497 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding status of Motion #10491 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/15.(su)(s/c to Mariano Maldonado−Pagan) (Entered: 09/25/2015)

09/25/2015 10519 ORDER denying 10499 LETTER references the provision of imitation cheese. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/15. (su)(s/c to Mariano Maldonado) (Entered: 09/25/2015)

09/28/2015 10520 MOTION to Withdraw as attorney for Jorge Anibal Torres Rodriguez Attorney as to Carlos Rafael Rodriguez−Garcia filed by Carlos Rafael Rodriguez−Garcia on behalf of Jorge Anibal Torres−Rodriguez Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/16/2015 (Rodriguez−Garcia, Carlos) (Entered: 09/28/2015)

09/28/2015 10521 Minute Entry: Final Approval Hearing on the proposed settlement set for 10/2/2015 09:00 AM will be held in Courtroom 7 before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. (Clerk)(ct) (Entered: 09/28/2015)

09/29/2015

10522

ORDER − DENIED as MOOT. Counsel filed motion in compliance on 5/29/15 10489 MOTION for extension of time until 5/29/31 to submitt Dr. Austin's estimate of costs filed by All Defendants; GRANTED 10490 Motion In Compliance with the May 4th Order filed by All Defendants; GRANTED 10494 Motion In Compliance with Docket No. 10492 filed by All Plaintiffs; GRANTED 10495 Motion In Compliance filed by All Defendants. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/15.(su) (Entered: 09/29/2015)

09/29/2015

10523

ORDER Re: 10493 LETTER/MOTION requesting Copy in the English Version of section No. 7 of the Inmates Classification Manual No. 6067 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. Class member Mariano Maldonado has requested a copy of section 7 of Classification Manual No. 6067. The defendants have failed to respond. Within 14 days, the defendants shall respond and inform the Court whether they have any objection to the request. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/15. (su)(s/c to Mariano Maldonado) (Entered: 09/29/2015)

09/29/2015 10524 ORDER− DENYING AS MOOT 10505 MOTION for extension of time to retain counsel filed by Jorge Anibal Torres−Rodriguez, pro se. Class member Jorge Anbal Torres filed a motion seeking more time to retain counsel. I granted his attorneys

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 502 of 513

motion to appear on September 18, 2015. Therefore this motion is denied as moot. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/25/15. (su)(s/c to Jorge A. Torres with copy of 10501 & 10512) (Entered: 09/29/2015)

09/29/2015 10525 ORDER − DENYING 10504 Motion alleging that all maximum custody inmates were allowed two contact visits per month and two non−contact visits per month filed by Mariono Maldonado, pro se. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/29/15. (su)(s/c to Mariano Maldonado) (Entered: 09/29/2015)

09/30/2015 10526 PRETRIAL MEMORANDUM by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 09/30/2015)

09/30/2015

10527

MOTION Requesting Approval of Proposed Amended Private Settlement Agreement re 10483 Joint MOTION Submitting Amended Private Settlement and Benefits Proposal and Revised Notice to Class re: 10452 Joint MOTION Requesting Preliminary Approval of Settlement filed by All Plaintiffs filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/19/2015 (Related document(s) 10483 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 09/30/2015)

09/30/2015 10528 ORDER granting 10520 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Carlos Rafael Rodriguez−Garcia terminated. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/28/15. (su)(s/c to Jorge Torres−Rodriguez) (Entered: 09/30/2015)

09/30/2015 10529 MOTION for Attorney Fees filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 10/19/2015 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 09/30/2015)

10/02/2015 10530 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro:Settlement Conference held on 10/2/2015. (Court Reporter Cindy Brown. Court Interpreter Edna Brayfield.) (cmd) (Entered: 10/08/2015)

10/15/2015 10531 MOTION Requesting Copy of Docket #10504 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 10/21/2015)

10/21/2015 10532 MOTION requesting copy of English version of section #7 of the Inmate Classification Manuel # 6067 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/9/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 10/22/2015)

10/27/2015

10533

LETTER/MOTION requesting Order filed by Jose Ortiz−Lopez, pro se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/13/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (nat) Modified on 11/30/2015 Pursuant to Order 10538 this document wil be treated as an OBJECTION to 10527 MOTION Requesting Approval of Proposed Amended Private Settlement Agreement. (su). (Entered: 11/03/2015)

11/09/2015 10534 MOTION Regarding Settlement filed by Carlos Henriquez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 11/13/2015)

11/18/2015 10535 ORDER − Plaintiffs' counsel are order to respond to 10534 MOTION Regarding Settlement filed by Carlos Henriquez, pro se. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/17/15.(su) (Entered: 11/18/2015)

11/23/2015 10542 MOTION requesting Order filed by Carlos Silva−Galindo, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 12/01/2015)

11/24/2015 10543 INFORMATIVE Motion filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/11/2015 (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (nat) (Entered: 12/01/2015)

11/29/2015

10536

Transcript of Proceedings, Settlement Conference, held on 10/02/15, before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. Court Reporter/Transcriber Cindy Lee Brown, Telephone number 775−722−9061. NOTICE RE REDACTION OF TRANSCRIPTS: The parties have seven (7) calendar days to file with the Court a Notice of Intent to Request Redaction of this transcript. If no such Notice is filed, the transcript will be available electronically to the public without redaction after 90 calendar days. The policy is

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 503 of 513

located at www.prd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER.. Redaction Request due 12/24/2015. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/4/2016. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/3/2016. (clb) (Entered: 11/29/2015)

11/30/2015 10537 ORDER denying 10533 Motion requesting that the air conditioners of the Ponce 1000 facility be replaced. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/24/15. (su)(s/c to Jose Ortiz−Lopez) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

11/30/2015 10538 ORDER denying 10493 and 10532 Motion requesting copy in English of a portion of Classification Manual No. 6067 of December 1999. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/24/15. (su)(s/c to Mariano Maldonado) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

11/30/2015 10539 ORDER granting 10531 Motion Requesting "a copy of the documents filed as regard the visits through glasses (docket #10504)." Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/24/15. (su)(s/c to Mariano Maldonado with copy of docket #10504) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

11/30/2015

10540

ORDER noted 10516 LETTER Motion regarding status of his prior motion filed by James T. Payne. The court will treat this filing as an objection to the proposed settlement agreement and will consider it when evaluating the parties' request for approval of the proposed settlement. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/24/15. (su)(s/c to James T. Payne) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

11/30/2015

10541

SETTLEMENT MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The parties to submit, within fourteen days, a joint proposal outlining how the parties will notify potential claimants of their possible entitlements pursuant to this agreement.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/30/15.(su) (Entered: 11/30/2015)

12/15/2015 10544 ORDER denying without prejudice 10542 Motion requesting to be transferred back to the Commonwealth's custody. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/14/15. (su)(s/c to Silva−Galindo) (Entered: 12/15/2015)

12/15/2015 10545 ORDER denying without prejudice 10543 MOTION for Reconsideration of 10538 Order denying copy in English of a portion of Classification Manual. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/14/15. (su)(s/c to Mariano Maldonado) (Entered: 12/15/2015)

12/15/2015

10546

ORDER granting 10515 Motion declaring himself to be a class member filed by Jose Gonzalez−Rosado, pro se. The motion is GRANTED, to the extent that Gonzlez Rosado seeks to be noted as a class member. To the extent that he seeks relief under the proposed settlement agreement, he must comply with the terms of that agreement. In pertinent part, the terms of the proposed agreement. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/14/15. (su)(s/c to Jose Gonzalez−Rosado) (Entered: 12/15/2015)

12/15/2015 10547 MOTION for extension of time until December 30, 2015 filed by Gerardo A. De−Jesus−Annoni on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/4/2016 (De−Jesus−Annoni, Gerardo) (Entered: 12/15/2015)

12/16/2015 10548 ORDER granting 10547 Motion for extension of time until 12/30/15 to submit a full media plan and butget. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/16/15. (su) (Entered: 12/16/2015)

12/28/2015

10549

ORDER Regarding FINE FUNDS. JOINT REPORT is due on 1/30/16, if you agree on a proposal concerning the disposition of the collected and uncollected fines. If not in agreement, a MEMORANDUM is due on 2/15/16 supporting yours respecttive positions.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 12/28/15.(su) (Entered: 12/28/2015)

01/05/2016 10551 RESPONSES filed by Rosado Jose Gonzalez Re: 10546 Order on Motion requesting Order, filed by Rosado Jose Gonzalez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 01/08/2016)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 504 of 513

01/07/2016 10550 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Rafael A. Gonzalez−Valiente on behalf of Roberto Roman−Valentin Suggestions in opposition/response due by 1/25/2016 (Gonzalez−Valiente, Rafael) (Entered: 01/07/2016)

01/11/2016 10552 RESPONSE to Motion filed by All Plaintiffs Re: 10550 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Roberto Roman−Valentin filed by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/11/2016)

01/29/2016 10553 ORDER GRANTING 10527 MOTION Requesting Approval of Proposed Amended Private Settlement Agreement.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/29/16. (su) (Entered: 01/29/2016)

01/29/2016 10554 ORDER − Telephone Conference set for 2/3/2016 10:00 AM Eastern Standard Time before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. The Court will initiate the call. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/29/16.(su) (Entered: 01/29/2016)

02/01/2016 10555 Minute Entry: Parties are advised that the Telephone Conference set for 2/3/2016 before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro will be held in Courtroom 1 at the Hato Rey Courthouse. This is not a public hearing.(Clerk)(ct) Modified on 2/1/2016 to add text (su). (Entered: 02/01/2016)

02/01/2016 10556 CLARIFYING ORDER Telephone Conference set for 2/3/2016 11:00 AM Puerto Rico Time in Courtroom 1 at the Hato Rey Courthouse before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.Signed by Clerk on 2/1/16.(su) (Entered: 02/01/2016)

02/02/2016 10557 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER Setting Deadlines re reimbursement of travel expenses for Francis McGovern. Objection to Proposed Payment Deadline due by 2/9/2016.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/2/16. (Attachments: # 1 Invoices for January 2015 and October 2015)(su) (Entered: 02/02/2016)

02/02/2016 10558 ORDER − DENYING without prejudice re 10551 Motion seeking a claim form. filed by Rosado Jose Gonzalez, pro se. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/2/16.(su)(s/c to Jose Gonzalez−Rosado) (Entered: 02/02/2016)

02/02/2016 10559 ORDER granting 10534 Motion requesting information regarding the settlement administration website, terms of settlement and claims process for potential benefits under the settlement filed by Carlos Henriquez, pro se. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/2/16. (su) (s/c to Carlos Heriquez) (Entered: 02/02/2016)

02/03/2016 10560 ORDER − Defendants shall submit a motion, supported by accompanying invoices, requesting disbursement of fine funds for unreimbursed consulting services performed by Dr. James Austin. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 2/17/2016.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/3/16.(su) (Entered: 02/03/2016)

02/03/2016 10561 ORDER − The parties shall submit memorandum concerning the disposition of collected and uncollected fine funds. Memorandum Deadline due by 4/4/2016.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/3/16.(su) (Entered: 02/03/2016)

02/03/2016

10562

ORDER − Regarding joint report concerning their claims form negotiations, and provide a proposed claims form to the court for approval. In addition, the parties shall submit for approval a joint proposal outlining how the parties will notify potential claimants of their possible entitlements pursuant to the private settlement and benefits program. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/3/16.(su) (Entered: 02/03/2016)

02/03/2016 10563 ORDER − Plaintiffs' counsel is authorized to destroy the case files that are currently in storage and the court will reimburse counsel from fine funds for reasonable expenses that are incurred in destroying the files, etc as stated herein. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/3/16.(su) (Entered: 02/03/2016)

02/03/2016 10564 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro:Telephone Conference held on 2/3/2016. (Court Reporter None.) (sr) (Entered: 02/05/2016)

02/11/2016 10565 **CASE PARTICIPANTS**ORDER OF DISTRIBUTION of Funds to McGovern Expenses 2015 re 10557 Order. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/11/16.(su) (Entered: 02/11/2016)

02/11/2016 10566 MOTION requesting Private Settlement Claim Form filed by Rosado Jose Gonzalez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service, # 2 Exhibit B (in the Spanish

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 505 of 513

Language), # 3 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 02/17/2016)

02/17/2016

10567

Motion In Compliance with 10083 Order and 10560 Order , MOTION for Disbursement of Funds from fine funds for the payment of Dr. James Austin's services related to the validation of the Classification Manual filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 Dr. James Austin invoice)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 2/18/2016 text and add relationship to order(su). Modified on 2/26/2016 to add relationship (su). (Entered: 02/17/2016)

02/17/2016 10568 Joint Motion In Compliance with 10562 Order filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 2/18/2016 text and to add relationship (su). (Entered: 02/17/2016)

02/19/2016 10569 ORDER Telephone Conference set for 2/25/2016 12:00 PM (PUERTO RICO TIME) in Courtroom 5 before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro. **NOT a Public Hearing**Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/19/16.(su) (Entered: 02/19/2016)

02/22/2016 10570 ORDER denying without prejudice 10566 Motion seeking a claims form or that the court consider his submission in lieu of a claims form. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/22/16. (su)(s/c to Jose Gonzalez−Rosado) (Entered: 02/22/2016)

02/24/2016 10571 Second Motion In Compliance with Docket 10562 filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/14/2016 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/24/2016)

02/25/2016 10573 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro:Telephone Conference held on 2/25/2016. (Court Reporter None.) (sr) (Entered: 02/26/2016)

02/26/2016

10572

ORDER − NOTED 10567 Motion In Compliance; GRANTING 10567 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. THE CLERK OF COURT shall disburse $1,650.00 from fine funds currently held in the courts registry account to Dr. Austin and $10,000.00 from fine funds for expenses associated with finishing validation of the Classification Manual. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/25/16. (su) (Entered: 02/26/2016)

02/26/2016

10574

NOTICE ORDER: Re: 10568 MOTION in Compliance. Parties granted until 3/10/16 to submit a joint motion specifying the date on which the claims period will begin. Upon agreement by the parties, at least 7 days prior to the beginning of the claims period, plaintiffs shall (1) publish notice of the claims period via full−page advertisements in El Nuevo Dia and Primera Hora, the two largest circulation newspapers in Puerto Rico, and (2) prepare a notice website, etc as stated herein. Notice of Compliance 3/10/2016.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/25/16.(su) (Entered: 02/26/2016)

03/02/2016 10575 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds pursuant to Docket No. 10563 filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/21/2016 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/02/2016)

03/04/2016 10576 ORDER granting 10575 Motion for Disbursement of Funds in the amount of $12,998.32 for rental fees paid for storage of case files, cost of destruction of those files. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/3/16. (su) (Entered: 03/04/2016)

03/08/2016 10580 NOTICE Regarding Proposed Private Settlement Agreement by Rosado Jose Gonzalez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (su) (Entered: 03/16/2016)

03/08/2016 10581 NOTICE of violation in Settlement by Arquelio Ruiz−Rodriguez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope) (su) (Entered: 03/16/2016)

03/09/2016 10577 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding Trustee's Motion #48 filed in Cv 15−1067 (PJB) filed by Julia A. Primero Miranda, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibis 1 to 15)(su) (Entered: 03/10/2016)

03/11/2016 10578 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding March 22, 2016, MOTION for extension of time until March 22, 2016 to comply with order at Docket 10574 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 3/31/2016 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/11/2016)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 506 of 513

03/14/2016 10579 ORDER granting 10578 Motion for extension of time. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/14/16. (su) (Entered: 03/14/2016)

03/15/2016 10582 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding that he has been privated of receiving medication ordered by the Physician who operate him at the Medical Center in PR filed by Santos Nieves−Conde, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 03/16/2016)

03/22/2016 10583 Final MOTION for Extension of Time until March 31, 2016 to file Joint Motion Specifying Commencement Date for Claims Period filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/8/2016 (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 03/22/2016)

03/29/2016 10584 LETTER requesting the status of Letter sent on 10/27/15 filed by James Perez−Hernandez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit (in the Spanish Language), # 2 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 03/31/2016)

03/31/2016

10585

Joint Motion In Compliance with order at ECF Document No. 10574 INFORMING THE AGREED DATE FOR THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE CLAIMS PERIOD filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 4/18/2016 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 03/31/2016)

04/01/2016

10586

ORDER − GRANTING 10583 Final MOTION for Extension of Time to file Joint Motion Specifying Commencement Date for Claims Period filed by All Plaintiffs and NOTING 10585 Joint Motion In Compliance with order at 10574 filed by All Defendants. Claims shall run from 5/15/16 until 11/15/16 , etc as stated herein. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 4/1/16.(su) (Entered: 04/01/2016)

04/15/2016

10587

Final MOTION for Extension of Time until May 15, 2016 to file Memoranda Concerning the Disposition of Collected and Uncollected Fine Funds filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/2/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 − Redacted Discharge Summary)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 04/15/2016)

04/19/2016 10588 ORDER − GRANTING 10587 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 15, 2016 to file Memoranda Concerning the Disposition of Collected and Uncollected Fine Funds filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 4/18/16. (su) (Entered: 04/19/2016)

05/04/2016

10589

MOTION Requesting Approval of Media Expert and Campaign re 10541 Memorandum & Opinion, 10586 Order,, Terminate Motions, filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/23/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix Media Campaign, # 2 Appendix LIH Contract)(Related document(s) 10541 , 10586 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/04/2016)

05/09/2016 10590 ORDER granting 10589 Motion Requesting the Approval of Media Expert and Campaign, etc as stated herein. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/6/16. (su) (Entered: 05/09/2016)

05/13/2016

10591

MOTION for Disbursement of Fine Funds re 10586 Order,, Terminate Motions, filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 5/31/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − Translation Invoice, # 2 Appendix 2 − Pirmera Hora Invoice, # 3 Appendix 3 − El Nuevo Dia Invoice)(Related document(s) 10586 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/13/2016)

05/16/2016 10596 MOTION requesting to be added to Class Action Member List of Plaintiffs filed by Samuel Ramos−Gonzalez, pro se (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service and Exhibits, # 2 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 05/19/2016)

05/17/2016 10592 MEMORANDUM Regarding Disposition of Uncollected Fine Funds In Compliance with 10561 Order filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) Modified on 5/18/2016 event and text (su). (Entered: 05/17/2016)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 507 of 513

05/17/2016

10593

MOTION Submitting English Language Publication Invoices re: 10591 MOTION for Disbursement of Fine Funds re 10586 Order,, Terminate Motions, filed by All Plaintiffs filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/3/2016 (Related document(s) 10591 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 05/17/2016)

05/17/2016 10594 Motion In Compliance with order at ECF Document No. 10561 filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 6/3/2016 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/17/2016)

05/18/2016 10595 ORDER − NOTED 10593 MOTION Submitting English Language Publication Invoices and HOLDING IN ABEYANCE 10591 MOTION for Disbursement of Fine Funds. Response to Motion Deadline due by 6/1/2016.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/18/16.(su) (Entered: 05/18/2016)

05/24/2016 10602 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Jose Bermudez−Velez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/24/2016 10603 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Teodoro Abrahan Jimenez, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/24/2016 10604 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Yassel Diaz−Santana, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/24/2016 10605 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Israel Rodriguez−Colon, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/25/2016 10597 ORDER denying 10577 INFORMATIVE motion regarding Trustee's Motion #48 filed in Cv 15−1067 (PJB). DENIED for the reasons set forth in 15−cv−1067 doc. no. 50 Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/25/16. (su) (Entered: 05/25/2016)

05/25/2016 10598 ORDER granting 10571 Motion In Compliance with 10562 Order. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/25/16. (su) (Entered: 05/25/2016)

05/25/2016 10599 ORDER DENYING 10581 MOTION informing that he has been deprived of the benefit of sentence recalculation and parole procedures filed by Arquelio Ruiz Rodriguez. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/25/16.(su)(s/c to Arquelio Ruiz) (Entered: 05/25/2016)

05/25/2016 10600 ORDER DENYING 10582 INFORMATIVE Motion regarding that he has been privated of receiving medication ordered by the Physician who operate him at the Medical Center in PR filed by Santos Nieves−Conde, Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/25/16. (su)(s/c to Santos Nieves Conde) (Entered: 05/25/2016)

05/25/2016

10601

ORDER granting 10584 Motion stating that he filed an affidavit and requests notification that it has been received filed by James Perez. Motion is granted to the extent that the court received his affidavit, but that filing an affidavit with the court does not constitute an application for potential benefits under the settlement. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/25/16. (su)(s/c to James Perez) (Entered: 05/25/2016)

05/25/2016 10606 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Norberto Baez−Soto, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/25/2016 10607 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Ismael E. Figueroa de la Cruz, pro se. (su) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/27/2016: # 1 Envelope) (su). (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/25/2016 10608 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Victor Rivera−Hernandez, pro se. (su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/26/2016 10609 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Victor Diaz−Encarnacion, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 508 of 513

05/26/2016 10610 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Benjamin Adorno−Garcia, pro se.(su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/26/2016 10611 MOTION requesting Application Form for the Claim of Benefits of the Transaction Agreement filed by Samuel Reyes−Reyes, pro se. (su) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/26/2016 10612 ORDER denying 10580 MOTION Requesting that the court consider his submission in lieu of a claims form, or in the alternative, that the Court hold his claim in abeyance filed by Jose Gonzalez−Rosado. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/26/16.(su)(s/c to deft) (Entered: 05/27/2016)

05/31/2016

10613

ORDER − DENYING the following MOTIONS: 10602 MOTION requesting Order filed by Jose Bermudez−Velez, 10603 MOTION requesting Order filed by Teodoro Abrahan Jimenez, 10604 MOTION requesting Order filed by Yassel Diaz−Santana, 10605 MOTION requesting Order filed by Israel Rodriguez−Colon, 10606 MOTION requesting Order filed by Norberto Baez−Soto, 10607 MOTION requesting Order filed by Ismael E. Figueroa de la Cruz, 10608 MOTION requesting Order filed by Victor Rivera−Hernandez, 10609 MOTION requesting Order filed by Victor Diaz−Encarnacion, 10610 MOTION requesting Order filed by Benjamin Adorno−Garcia, and 10611 MOTION requesting Order filed by Samuel Reyes−Reyes. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/31/16.(su)(s/c to all defts) (Entered: 05/31/2016)

05/31/2016 10614 ORDER denying without prejudice 10596 Motion requesting to be included as a benefits pursuant to the settlement agreement filed by Samuel Ramos−Gonzalez. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/31/16. (su)(s/c to deft) (Entered: 05/31/2016)

06/08/2016 10615 ORDER granting 10591 MOTION for Reimbursement of translation costs and notice of publication in the news papers. The Clerk is directed to disburse a total of $8,691.72 to Despacho Juridico Ramos Luina, LLC. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 6/8/16. (su) (Entered: 06/08/2016)

06/30/2016 10616 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Arlene R. Perez−Borrero filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Suggestions in opposition/response due by 7/18/2016 (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 06/30/2016)

07/13/2016

10617

Motion In Compliance with Orders of this Court; and (2) that it approve a distribution from the Morales−Feliciano fine funds (Cas No.79−0004) to the Bankruptcy Estate of Corporacin Accin Civil (Bank. Case No. 11−10608) in the amount of $383,884.63. filed by Rafael A. Gonzalez−Valiente on behalf of Roberto Roman−Valentin Suggestions in opposition/response due by 8/1/2016 (Gonzalez−Valiente, Rafael) (Entered: 07/13/2016)

07/15/2016 10618 ORDER re 10586 and 10590 Orders: Parties shall submit a JOINT STATUS REPORT regarding any actions taken pursuant to that notice plan since the claims period began. Joint Status Report due by 7/30/2016.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 7/15/16.(su) (Entered: 07/15/2016)

07/19/2016 10623 OBJECTION to the Agreement filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 07/27/2016)

07/21/2016 10619 ORDER − A Telephone Status Conference will be set by the Clerk to discuss the disposition of the collected and uncollected fine funds, etc. as stated herein. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 7/21/16.(su) (Entered: 07/21/2016)

07/21/2016 10620 ORDER Telephone Status Conference set for TUESDAY 7/26/2016 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4 in Hato Rey before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro.Signed by Clerk on 7/21/16.(su) (Entered: 07/21/2016)

07/22/2016 10621 ORDER granting 10616 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Arlene R. Perez−Borrero terminated. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 7/22/16. (su) (Entered: 07/22/2016)

07/26/2016 10622 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Paul J. Barbadoro: Telephone Conference held on 7/26/2016. Matters discussed: compliance with settlement agreement, disposition of collected and uncollected fine funds and the upgrading of the medical record system. (Court Reporter Evylis Carrion.)(ct) (Entered:

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 509 of 513

07/26/2016)

08/01/2016 10624 STATUS REPORT in Compliance with Docket No. 10618 by All Plaintiffs. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 08/01/2016)

08/23/2016

10625

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER − regarding remaining fines. The court orders that the Collected Fines that remain in the court's control after all remaining expenses have been satisfied shall be paid to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The Commonwealth will hold those monies, and the $20 million now in the guaranty account, in a segregated account. The Commonwealth shall use those funds within the next three years for new capital expenditures that benefit inmates in Puerto Rico's correctional system. At least ninety days before the Commonwealth intends to expend funds from this account, it shall submit a memorandum to the district court describing the proposed expenditure, and explaining how the project would benefit inmates. The court will then consider any objections, and either approve or reject the Commonwealth's proposal. It is further ordered that the Commonwealth's obligation to pay the remaining Uncollected Fines is cancelled.To the extent that they are inconsistent with this Memorandum and Order, the parties' motions, Doc. Nos. 10529 , 10592 , 10594 , are denied. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 8/23/16.(su) (Entered: 08/23/2016)

09/01/2016

10626

ORDER − DENYING AS MOOT 10550 Motion for Disbursement of Funds and GRANTING 10617 The Chapter 7 trustee's Motion seeking money from fine funds. The Clerk is directed to disburse $383,884.63 from Morales Feliciano fine funds to the Chapter 7 trustee, etc. as stated herein. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 8/31/16. (su) (Entered: 09/01/2016)

09/02/2016 10627 ORDER re 10572 Order for Disbursement of $10,000 to complete the validation of the classification manual. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/2/16.(su) (Entered: 09/02/2016)

09/02/2016 10628 FINAL JUDGMENT. Signed by the Clerk of Court and Approved by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/1/16.(su) (Entered: 09/02/2016)

10/05/2016 10629 MOTION Requesting Copy of his last motion filed in this case filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 10/17/2016)

10/26/2016 10630 MOTION requesting copy of his last motion filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 10/31/2016)

11/02/2016 10631 ORDER − DENYING 10629 and 10630 MOTION Requesting Copy of the Last Motion filed by him filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan. This Court's function is not to provide copies of previously filed documents. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 11/1/16.(su) (s/c to Mariano Maldonado) (Entered: 11/02/2016)

11/07/2016 10632 MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/28/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − May 2016 Invoice from LIH, # 2 Appendix 2 − June 2016 Invoice from LIH)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 11/07/2016)

11/07/2016

10633

Second MOTION for Disbursement of Funds pursuant to Docket No. 10590 filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 11/28/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − July 2016 Invoice from LIH, # 2 Appendix 2 − August 2016 Invoice from LIH, # 3 Appendix 3 − September 2016 Invoice from LIH)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 11/07/2016)

11/22/2016 10634 Third MOTION for Disbursement of Funds filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Suggestions in opposition/response due by 12/9/2016 (Attachments: # 1 Appendix 1 − October 2016 Invoice by LIH)(Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 11/22/2016)

01/04/2017 10635 Supplemental MOTION for Disbursement of Funds pursuant to Docket No. 10590 filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Responses due by 1/18/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 01/04/2017)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 510 of 513

01/09/2017

10636

ORDER − GRANTING 10632 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; GRANTING 10633 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; GRANTING 10634 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Clerk's office to disburse to Despacho Jurdico Ramos Luia, LLC the total amount of $232,757.09 from the fine funds held in the court's registry account. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/5/17. (su) (Entered: 01/09/2017)

01/09/2017 10637 ORDER DENYING as MOOT 10635 Motion for Disbursement of Funds. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/5/17. (su) (Entered: 01/09/2017)

02/15/2017

10638

MOTION for Leave to Appear , MOTION for extension of time until July 15, 2017 to To Extend Goverment Benefits filed by Ivan Solares−Nunez on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Defendant−All Responses due by 3/1/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Solares−Nunez, Ivan) (Entered: 02/15/2017)

03/02/2017

10639

ORDER − DENYING 10638 MOTION for extension of time until July 15, 2017 to To Extend Government Benefits filed by Ivan Solares−Nunez on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.The aspect of the case that the motion addresses was resolved through a private settlement agreement. That agreement provides that this court will play no role in resolving disputes that may arise under the agreement. Defendants' counsel seeks a relatively brief extension of one deadline established by the agreement that appears to be reasonable under the circumstances set forth in the motion. This court, however, has no power to modify the agreement. Accordingly, the motion is denied without prejudice to the defendants' right to seek to negotiate an agreement for the extension of the deadline with plaintiffs'counsel. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/2/17. (su) (Entered: 03/02/2017)

03/03/2017 10640 FINAL FUND DISPOSITION ORDER re 10625 Order. Notice of Compliance Deadline due by 3/16/2017.Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/3/17.(su) (Entered: 03/03/2017)

03/14/2017

10641

MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel Attorney as to Ivan Solares−Nunez filed by Ivan Solares−Nunez on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Defendant−All Responses due by 3/28/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Solares−Nunez, Ivan) (Entered: 03/14/2017)

03/16/2017

10642

Motion In Compliance as to 10640 Order, Set Deadlines filed by Melissa Massheder−Torres on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 3/30/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Certification)(Related document(s) 10640 ) (Massheder−Torres, ) (Entered: 03/16/2017)

03/17/2017

10643

Supplemental Motion re: 10642 Motion In Compliance as to 10640 Order, Set Deadlines filed by Melissa Massheder−Torres on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 3/31/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) 10642 ) (Massheder−Torres, ) (Entered: 03/17/2017)

03/22/2017

10644

ORDER − GRANTING 10641 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Ivan Solares−Nunez filed by Defendant−All; GRANTING 10642 Motion In Compliance as to 10640 Order and GRANTING 10643 Supplemental Motion re: 10642 Motion In Compliance. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/22/17.(su) (Entered: 03/22/2017)

04/11/2017 10645 MOTION to Restrict Document filed by Melissa Massheder−Torres on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 4/25/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Massheder−Torres, ) (Entered: 04/11/2017)

04/11/2017 10646 MOTION to Restrict Document filed by Melissa Massheder−Torres on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 4/25/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Massheder−Torres, ) (Entered: 04/11/2017)

04/11/2017 10647 **CASE PARTICIPANTS** Motion In Compliance filed by Melissa Massheder−Torres on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 4/25/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 511 of 513

service done electronically. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Check and Deposit)(Massheder−Torres, ) (Entered: 04/11/2017)

04/17/2017

10648

ORDER − GRANTED 10645 MOTION to Restrict Document filed by Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; REVIEWED 10647 Motion In Compliance filed by Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; GRANTED 10646 MOTION to Restrict Document filed by Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 4/13/17.(su) (Entered: 04/17/2017)

04/21/2017 10649 MOTION Requesting Copy of Docket Sheet from today up to 1/1/16 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(su) (Entered: 04/25/2017)

04/26/2017

10650

ORDER − DENYING 10649 Motion Requesting Copy of Docket Sheet from today up to 1/1/16 filed by Mariano Maldonado−Pagan, pro se. The court does not ordinarily provide free copies of documents. The filer may prepay for copies to be made by the court at the rate of $.50 per page. He should make his request by letter addressed to the Clerk, not by a motion. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 4/26/17. (su) (s/c Mariano Maldonado) (Entered: 04/26/2017)

06/06/2017

10651

NOTICE of Appearance filed by Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 6/20/2017. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Zampierollo−Vila, Jaime) Modified on 6/9/2017 to edit event(cm). (Entered: 06/06/2017)

06/09/2017

NOTICE of Docket Text Modification by Deputy Clerk. DE# 10651 Motion to Appear, corrected event to Notice of Appearance, (Not a Motion). (cm) (Entered: 06/09/2017)

02/06/2018 10652 Consent MOTION Requesting Approval for Use of Fine Funds filed by Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 2/20/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Zampierollo−Vila, Jaime) (Entered: 02/06/2018)

02/14/2018 10653 ORDER re 10652 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. The court has reviewed the Commonwealth defendants' request and determined that the proposed expenditure is for a purpose permitted under the court's prior order. Motion granted. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/14/2018. (gav) (Entered: 02/14/2018)

02/26/2018 10654 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING. Document is not in English language. (gav) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/1/2018: # 1 Letter/Motion, # 2 Envelope) (gav). (Entered: 02/26/2018)

02/28/2018 10655 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING. Document is not in English. (gav) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/28/2018: # 1 Letter, # 2 Envelope) (gav). (Entered: 02/28/2018)

03/08/2018 10656 MOTION for Leave to File Spanish language documents filed by Luis R. Hernandez−Rivera, Pro se. Responses due by 3/22/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(gav) (Entered: 03/09/2018)

03/27/2018

10657

ORDER re 10656 Motion for Leave to File Spanish language documents. DENIED. this is a closed case. The settlement agreement reached by the parties provides for dispute resolution procedures that do not contemplate the involvement of the court. Therefore, no purpose would be served in allowing a Spanish language pleading to be filed in violation of court rules. The motion is denied without prejudice to the moving party's right to seek relief in a newly filed action if the facts justify such a filing. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 3/27/2018. (gav) (Entered: 03/27/2018)

04/04/2018 10658 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE FILING. Document is not in English language. (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (gav) (Entered: 04/04/2018)

04/05/2018 10659 Consent MOTION Requesting Approval for Use of Fine Funds filed by Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 4/19/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 512 of 513

service done electronically. (Zampierollo−Vila, Jaime) (Entered: 04/05/2018)

04/06/2018 10660 ORDER granting 10659 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 4/5/2018. (gav) (Entered: 04/06/2018)

04/12/2018 10661 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING. Document is not in English language. (Attachments: # 1 Motion, # 2 Envelope) (gav) (Entered: 04/12/2018)

04/16/2018 10662 CLERK'S NOTICE OF DEFECTIVE PLEADING. Document is not in English language. (copy sent to filer Jose A. Santiago−Tanco by regular mail) (Attachments: # 1 Letter) (gav) (Entered: 04/17/2018)

06/06/2018 10663 Consent MOTION Requesting Approval for Use of Fine Funds filed by Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 6/20/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Zampierollo−Vila, Jaime) (Entered: 06/06/2018)

06/06/2018 10664 ORDER granting 10663 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 6/6/2018. (gav) (Entered: 06/07/2018)

07/16/2018 10665 MOTION to Withdraw Attorney as to Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila filed by Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Responses due by 7/30/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Zampierollo−Vila, Jaime) (Entered: 07/16/2018)

07/18/2018 10666 ORDER granting 10665 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney. Attorney Jaime J. Zampierollo−Vila terminated. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 7/18/2018. (gav) (Entered: 07/18/2018)

07/27/2018 10667 NOTICE of Appearance by Joel Torres−Ortiz on behalf of Commonwealth of Puerto Rico (Torres−Ortiz, Joel) (Entered: 07/27/2018)

10/26/2018 10668 NOTICE of Appearance by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 10/26/2018)

12/13/2018 10669 MOTION requesting Order filed by Jorge Gonzalez−Vasquez, Pro se. Responses due by 12/27/2018. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: # 1 Envelope)(gav) (Entered: 12/14/2018)

01/04/2019 10670 ORDER re 10669 Motion requesting Order. The Clerk shall provide Mr. Gonzalez−Vasquez with contact information for class counsel. (Notice sent by regular mail with class counsel contact information.) Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/3/2019. (gav) (Entered: 01/04/2019)

01/24/2019

10671

INFORMATIVE Motion regarding REQUEST OF APPROVAL FOR USE OF FINE FUNDS FOR EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM FOR THE CORRECTIONAL POPULATION filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Responses due by 2/7/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 01/24/2019)

01/24/2019

10672

MOTION for Disbursement of Funds for the Payment of Correctional Health Services Corporation as the Claims Administrator filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Responses due by 2/7/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit CHSC Invoice)(Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 1/25/2019 lower caps (gav). (Entered: 01/24/2019)

01/30/2019 10673 ORDER: On or before February 15, 2019 plaintiffs' counsel shall inform the court of his position with respect to documents 10671 and 10672 . Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 1/30/2019.(gav) (Entered: 01/30/2019)

02/19/2019 10674 Motion In Compliance as to 10673 Order filed by Guillermo J. Ramos−Luina on behalf of All Plaintiffs Responses due by 3/5/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Related document(s) 10673 ) (Ramos−Luina, Guillermo) (Entered: 02/19/2019)

Case: 3:79-cv-4 As of: 01/28/2020 01:21 PM AST 513 of 513

02/26/2019 10675 ORDER granting 10671 INFORMATIVE motion; granting 10672 Motion for Disbursement of Funds; granting 10674 Motion In Compliance. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 2/25/2019. (gav) (Entered: 02/26/2019)

05/15/2019

10676

MOTION CONSENTED MOTION REQUESTING APPROVAL FOR USE OF FINE FUNDS (Electronic Records) filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Responses due by 5/29/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) (Entered: 05/15/2019)

05/24/2019 10677 ORDER granting 10676 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 5/23/2019. (gav) (Entered: 05/24/2019)

09/03/2019

10678

MOTION Consented Motion Requesting Approval for Use of Fine Funds filed by Arlene R. Perez−Borrero on behalf of All Defendants Responses due by 9/17/2019. NOTE: Pursuant to FRCP 6(a) an additional three days does not apply to service done electronically. (Perez−Borrero, Arlene) Modified on 9/4/2019 lower caps (gav). (Entered: 09/03/2019)

09/06/2019 10679 ORDER granting 10678 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief. Signed by Judge Paul J. Barbadoro on 9/4/2019. (Entered: 09/06/2019)

 
 497 F.Supp. 14 (1979)
Carlos Morales FELICIANO et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Carlos Romero BARCELO et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4.
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
January 3, 1979.
15 *15 Harvey B. Nachman, Santurce, P. R., Servicios Legales de P. R., Inc., Río Piedras, P. R., for plaintiffs.
Raúl Juan Escudero, Dept. of Justice, San Juan, P. R., Robert B. Donnin, Mayda Colón Tsaknis, Puerto Rico Federal Affairs Administration, Washington, D. C., for defendants.
16 *16 OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
This action involves the alleged violations of the rights of prisoners and pre-trial detainees confined by the Administration of Correction of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. This type of case has grown as rivers growdeeper, wider and with a crescendo of speed and noise as they approach the oceans. This watercourse has not sprouted overnight, but has developed through the years from a small creek to its present size.[1] The instant action is as ambitious an action as we have seen reported anywhere. The entire correctional system of the Commonwealth is challenged on the ground that it violates the due process rights, the equal protection rights, the rights of free association, and the right of access to the courts, as well as the right to be free or rid of cruel and unusual punishment.
Plaintiffs are all persons incarcerated under the custody of the Administrator of Correction and the defendants are the Governor of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, the Administrator of Correction and the present and some former members of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. The action was filed in early 1979, but has a genealogy of other class actions previously filed and decided by this Court.[2]
17 *17 After nearly a year and a half of extensive discovery, most of which was bitterly contested, the plaintiffs procured orders to distribute questionnaires, to have experts visit selected institutions and to take both motion pictures and still photographs of the institutions. The picture taking was governed by stringent regulations to prevent any possibility of either public disclosure or revelation of prison security. With the pictures and reports of the experts, the plaintiffs moved for a Preliminary Injunction and for Emergency, Provisional and Extraordinary Relief. That motion was accompanied by affidavits from five experts,[3] the qualifications of whom were uncontested; portions of the depositions of the Administrator of Correction; and, copies of various Standards or Draft Standards of national organizations or governments.[4]
Convinced that a prima facie showing had been made in relation to basic health and custodial care, this Court issued an Order to Show Cause on May 9, 1980, directing the defendants to file, if they so desired, a response to the Motion for Preliminary Injunction not later than May 21, 1980, and that the hearing on the Show Cause Order commence on May 27, 1980. The plaintiffs requested emergency relief in nine designated areas:
1. To close the "calabozos" or dungeons to human occupation;
2. To transfer all known psychotics or other definable mentally ill inmates out of the prison system into mental hospitals or other institutions designed to treat such persons;

3. To screen all incoming inmates, whether convicted persons or pretrial detainees, to separate the psychotics for removal;
4. To screen the entire prison population for contagious, infectious, respiratory and venereal diseases and for such other physical conditions such as epilepsy, diabetes, blood pressure, liver disorders, and to continue to do such screening of every inmate admitted to the system in the future;
5. To reduce the population of every institution under the authority of the Administrator of Correction to a number compatible with minimum physical and mental health standards;
6. To provide each inmate with a personal living space of at least seventy (70) square feet and at least five (5) hours a day outside of such confinement;
7. To provide each inmate who requires, a special diet for medical or religious reasons, with such a diet;
8. To provide (or to advise the Court what was needed to so provide) with staff, facilities and supplies necessary to deliver adequate health care and adequate sanitation to all the institutions operated by or under the authority of the Administration of Correction;
9. Provide a psychological and psychiatric screening of all persons confined in the institutions.
The Court heard a total of 45 witnesses, carefully scrutinized all the exhibits admitted into evidence, including the four hundred (400) photographs, the selected medical and psychological records, the motion pictures of each of the closed institutions and of Sabana Hoyos Prison Camp, and all the papers filed by the attorneys for the 18 parties. In addition to the thousands of pages *18 of documentary evidence, the Court has re-read the transcript of proceedings of nearly 3,000 pages and all of the cases cited by the parties. The Court cannot delay any further this ruling.
The Administration of Correction of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico is an integrated system structured by statute to find effective ways of providing individualized treatment to foster rehabilitation. 4 L.P. R.A. 1111, 1112. [5] The legislature of Puerto Rico recognized its obligation of providing adequate medical care and hospital services. 4 L.P.R.A. 1112(f). Rehabilitation and humanitarian treatment is mandated not only in the organizing statute, 4 L.P.R.A. 1111-1125, inclusive, but in a number of the provisions of the Constitution of Puerto Rico. Article II, Section 1; Article II, Section 7; Article II, Section 1; Article II, Section 12; and Article VI, Section 19.
Because the Court finds that the defendants have so blatantly violated the federal Constitution's interdiction against cruel and unusual punishment, it becomes unnecessary to pass upon the plaintiffs' various claims of denials of due process, of statutory due process, or of equal protection of the laws. The importance of these statutes heretofore mentioned is that they negate any local or state justification or mitigating circumstances. Puerto Rico, by its laws, recognizes its duty and obligations to its prisoners and pre-trial detainees.[6] The statutory obligations imposed upon the executives of the local government are more exacting than the reported decisions on the minimum quality of treatment required by the Eighth Amendment. There is no justification for the cruel and brutalizing conditions and treatment that the penal and pre-trial populations of Puerto Rico's prisons are compelled to endure. What has been shown the Court might be incredible to a naive person who accepted the presumption that legal duties are followed were it not for the fact that all these horrors have been preserved on film and frequently, in the records or lack of records of the several institutions.
Psychotic mad men are kept for weeks and months, (some pre-trial detainees) caged like animals, without clothes, without toilet facilities, without medicines, forced to eat with their hands and in most cases without ever having been seen by a doctor. Others, presumably sane, seeking asylum from threats of death or serious injury in the general penal population, lose all their privileges, all programs for possible rehabilitation, all chance for parole, all recreation, while they are locked in dungeons called "calabozos".
Prisoners and pre-trial detainees die from lack of medical treatment. Epileptics inflict upon themselves or suffer injuries which are too often fatal. Suicides are alarmingly frequent, but not so staggering to the mind as the number of violent deaths that the Court has reviewed. Raw sewage runs in dormitories and kitchens; toilets in all

closed institutions do not work; prescriptions do not get filled; bed and mattresses are not provided; nor, for that matter is soap, toothpaste or toothbrushes, or sufficient toilet paper. Food has to be destroyed everywhere because it has been contaminated by rats or other vermin. Usually, people cannot see a doctor unless the prison guards acquiesce. They cannot be sent to a hospital if ordered by a physician unless there are enough prison guards available. There is no screening of incoming inmates and apart from check-ups made every six months by federal authorities for venereal disease, many prisoners never see a physician or are they given a medical examination. The only psychiatric screening that the overwhelming number of inmates receive is the untrained subjective evaluation of the prison guard. Overcrowding, the basic evil of each closed institution, is so intense 19 that in some areas, such as the "Q" or quarantine section of the Bayamón *19 Regional Institution, where pre-trial detainees constitute the overwhelming majority, the inmate may have no more than fifteen (15) square feet of living space.
This evidence presented by the plaintiffs was not controverted. Defendants and their experts admitted all these shortcomings, as did the witnesses who were subpoenaed from the Administration of Correction. An emergency exists. The fundamental Constitutional guarantees of these prisoners have been and are being violated daily. The Court cannot, in view of the evidence, and the fact that half-hearted attempts to correct anything have only been made at the eleventh hour, most of them during the hearing, stay its hand or defer to the local authorities.[7] The Court accepts its jurisdiction and its responsibility. An injunction shall issue.
Findings of Fact
1. The Administration of Correction is a governmental agency that operates all the institutions where pre-trial detainees are kept and convicted persons are housed. It is an integrated agency.
2. There are nineteen (19) institutions in all, ten (10) of them designated as closed institutions: Aguadilla, Arecibo, Ponce, Guayama, Bayamón, Humacao, Vega Alta Industrial School for Women, Miramar Young Adults Institution, the Intensive Treatment Unit at Río Piedras, and the San Juan Municipal Jail.[8]
The Intensive Treatment Unit at Río Piedras presently houses prisoners who are almost all classified as maximum custody prisoners. They are kept in individual cells and although there have been visits by experts, and testimony about conditions, the situation there is not comparable to the situation at the other closed institutions. Likewise, the testimony concerning the San Juan Municipal Jail has been so meager that no specific findings will be made concerning that institution.[9]
3. Each of the other closed institutions has a budget for food, medicines, linens, supplies, and said budget is administered by the superintendent of the respective institution. The distribution of medicines, the transfer of inmates and the supervision of medicines, repairs and other functions are all assumed by the central office, which also coordinates all medical services and prepares contracts with individual physicians.
The bases for the following findings are principally the motion pictures and still photographs that the Court 20 examined and the testimony of the several superintendents. *20 Whenever the testimony of an expert is used as
a basis for a finding, the name of the expert and the transcript reference will be given.
4. The Aguadilla Regional Jail is so old that its date of construction is unknown, but it was probably built before the turn of the century. Except for female prisoners, it houses pretrial detainees, young adult offenders and convicted criminals of every custodial classification. At one time, this institution only had 90 beds, which appears to be too many for the interior space. About one year ago, its "rated capacity" was raised by the Administration of Correction to 125 inmates. At the time that rating was made by the central office of the Administration, there were already 148 beds occupied. On June 4, 1980, 182 inmates were housed at Aguadilla, and there have been on occasion as many as 215 inmates.
5. This overcrowding has made it impossible for the superintendent to put prisoners to work who are entitled to reduce their sentences by productive labor because there is insufficient space. The space restriction makes use of the only available recreation area, the inner patio of less than 848 square feet, unavailable for exercise or

recreation until after 4:00 P.M. To accommodate all the inmates, the space is used on a rotation basis so that young adult offenders, for example, are able to exercise once a week.
6. Overcrowding at Aguadilla is, in part, a contributing cause for the occasional out-breaks of scabies and other skin infections. Screens, which are vitally needed to keep out flies, have not been installed because they would cut off the circulation of air. Even though there are insufficient beds, prisoners who sleep on the floor usually sleep on mattresses, but sometimes, there are insufficient mattresses and then inmates have to sleep either doubled or on the floor without mattresses.
7. The "calabozos" or dungeons or isolation cells, are primitive; they have no windows and as recently as a year ago, they had no toilet or wash basin. They became somewhat more liveable after the deposition of the superintendent had been taken. Two persons have recently died in the "calabozos" in Aguadilla, both of them pre-trial detainees. Both were placed there because they appeared mentally ill. One was a known alcoholic; the other was an unknown epileptic. Both died without receiving adequate medical attention and there was not even a medical file for the epileptic.
8. The "calabozos" have been used in Aguadilla only to house "psychotics" (as determined by the penal guards) or persons who seek asylum from physical harm in the general population of the prison.
9. There is another dormitory ward in Aguadilla where mentally ill, only, are kept. There are no psychiatric or medical facilities to tend to them; there is no psychiatrist who visits the institution. The medical care program in Aguadilla consists of a doctor who attends a total of six hours per week over a five-day period and earns $15.00 per hour. There is no full-time doctor, dentist, pharmacist or nurse, although a nurse was retained between the time of the superintendent's testimony and the testimony of the defendants' expert. There is no pharmacy, but there are medicines purchased with a total current annual budget of $750.00. There is no preventive medicine or dental program; no regular physical check-up; no vaccination program and no obligation on the part of the contract physician to attend to the emergencies. The medical files are inadequate; they have no regular entries; no memoranda from the contract physician; no sick call entries and no reports of physical examinations. New medical records for in-coming inmates are being made up by the superintendent at home.
10. There is in Aguadilla, however, a citizens' committee which provides medicines to inmates when needed, which helps with emergency medical problems and otherwise assists the superintendent whenever he calls up its members. In fact, the superintendent does not believe he could do without the committee. The superintendent 21 has had contact with the coordinator of medical services from the central office of the Administration *21 of Correction, at most, on an average of once a year.
11. The experts were unanimous in praising the efforts made by the officials at Aguadilla to keep the place clean. But, only the defendants' expert felt that the use of the citizens' committee was a healthy sign. The Court finds that the Commonwealth cannot avoid its obligations in providing basic health services by reliance upon volunteer services.
12. The psychiatric treatment or lack of it, is disgraceful. On the date that the plaintiffs' psychiatric expert, Dr. Frank Rundle, visited Aguadilla, there were 205 inmates. (Rundle, T. 234). More than half of the persons in the dormitory for the mentally disturbed had to sleep on the floor on mattresses. (Rundle, T. 235). That dormitory had less than fifteen (15) square feet living space per person. (Rundle, T. 235). One person in "calabozo" was diagnosed as having organic brain syndrome (Rundle, T. 236); another in "calabozo" was there because he was allegedly mentally ill, but there was no medical history and no physical examination record. There were also no reports of alleged treatment at mental health clinics in Aguadilla, or at the Mayaguez Regional Hospital. (Rundle, T. 237-238).
13. The medicines were improperly organized. (King, T. 675). A recent epidemic of skin rashes had occurred. (King, T. 676). The sanitation facilities were not only broken or improper, there were an insufficient number for the persons incarcerated. (King, T. 677). The medical treatment and the medical record keeping was completely inadequate. (King, T. 678-679). The heat in Aguadilla is unbearable and that, plus the lack of facilities and the overcrowding, makes inevitable that deterioration is the only effect for the mentally ill inmates. (Diaz-Royo, T. 1696).

14. The conditions of overcrowding and lack of facilities were not contested by the defendants' expert. (Hastings, T. 2651-2652). The superintendent himself was of the opinion that the mentally ill should be out of "calabozos" and out of the prison into a psychiatric hospital. (T. 1073-1074). He sees no need for "calabozos" at all. (T. 1073).
15. The Arecibo District Jail is 75 years old and houses both pre-trial and convicted inmates. Although the "rated capacity" is 220 inmates, that number has been constantly exceeded for the past three years. Some inmates sleep without beds, and articles of personal hygiene are not supplied. There are no facilities at the institution for psychiatric or dental care or X-rays. There is no laboratory or pharmacy or pharmacist, but there is a $700.00 budgetary allowance for medicines.
16. Medical services are provided by a doctor who comes five hours a week. There is no provision for medical assistance on week-ends. The medical records are poorly kept, and there is no effort to take physical histories, make or record physical examinations, nor are the results of TB screening or sick-call notes placed in the individual charts.
17. The "calabozos" at Arecibo are like cages with bars on the top. Suicides have occurred there. There is at least one case of a man being housed in a "calabozo" for more than one year. Individual "calabozos" are frequently used for two or more persons at a time. All severely mentally ill are placed in "calabozos" in Arecibo.
18. Like the other institutions, there is no hot water in the dormitory areas. Adult and young offenders are frequently housed together and there have been at least three inmate deaths during the past year, and in none of the cases could it be said that adequate medical treatment was given.
19. There is no privacy at sick calls. (King, T. 649). The organization of medicines is haphazard and many medicines are kept beyond their expiration date. (King, T. 649). Medical records are so poorly organized that charts concerning one inmate may be found inside the files of another man. (King, T. 649-651). There is no first aid kit, no laboratory tests, no emergency equipment at all. (King, T. 651-653). There are no charts for nine of the 22 ten *22 psychotics that were in "calabozos". (King, T. 655). The medical records are totally inadequate. (Hastings, T. 2784).
20. The persons in "calabozo" are markedly agitated and disoriented. (King, T. 655). The "calabozos" are contraindicated for potential suicides. Because of the way the "calabozos" are constructed, it is easy for a person to hang himself. (Hastings, T. 2786).
21. The stench from the overcrowding throughout the institution is omnipresent. (Díaz-Royo, T. 1679).
22. The Ponce Regional Institution was built in 1849. Young adults, pretrial detainees and all custody classifications for convicted prisoners are housed at Ponce. Occasionally, women pre-trial detainees are housed there as well. The superintendent had no idea of the capacity (but Dr. Hastings was advised that the "capacity" was 250). That "rating" was not made by any standard acceptable to the American Correctional Association. (Hastings, T. 2789). There were on the date of Dr. Hastings' visit, 404 inmates. (Hastings, T. 2789). The number of toilets, showers and wash basins are totally inadequate. The institution is horribly overcrowded. People are sleeping on the floor everywhere. The budget at Ponce for repairs was less in 1979/80 than it was in 1978/79.
23. The medical services at Ponce are unacceptable. There is no record of sick call notes, no history or physical examinations. (Hastings, T. 2626). There are not even any records of physical examinations for inmates who have been hospitalized. (King, T. 670). There were no records for psychiatric inmates, even those in "calabozos". (Rundle, T. 222). In the hospital area inside the institution, there is a desperate need for disinfectants, soap and toilet paper. (Rundle, T. 344). The hospital area is a fire trap. (King, T. 670).
24. The "calabozos" are small; they have no windows, no beds, no wash basin, no showers and no drinking water. They are only about 3 feet wide and are 10 to 12 feet deep. Toilets have been placed in some of them during the hearing or slightly before the hearing commenced. Some of those toilets are not connected to the plumbing system. As many as three naked men have been placed in a single dungeon. Most of the people placed in "calabozos" in Ponce are mental cases and at least one man had been in "calabozo" for more than two years.

25. The "calabozos" are filthy and they stink. (Rundle, T. 216-217). One man was apparently in "calabozo" even though his criminal case had been dismissed in 1978. (Rundle, T. 219-220). There is no access to psychiatric services. (Hastings, T. 2627). On the day of Dr. Hastings' visit, there were 14 persons confined in six "calabozos"; two of which had no toilets. (Hastings, T. 2790). The "calabozos" in Ponce are extremely dark and depressing. (Hastings, T. 2792).
26. The hospital area in the prison has been patched with tin cans to prevent rats from coming through the floor. (Díaz-Royo, T. 1690). The medical records are not even dated and no medical record was found in Ponce that was complete. (King, T. 672).
27. The sanitation is horrible. The dormitories are overcrowded and gloomy; the bathrooms are dirty with no working toilets and showers. The kitchen floor and equipment is broken and unsatisfactory, which constitutes a public health hazard. It also contains an open sewer. (Rundle, T. 354). There are no recreation areas in Ponce that are adequate (Rundle, T. 224), and young adults that were found by Dr. Díaz-Royo to be filled with rage (Díaz-Royo, T. 1690), were no longer in the institution at the time of Dr. Hastings' visit. The overcrowding is so bad that there are insufficient beds, mattresses and sheets, and people have died for lack of medical attention. (Hastings, T. 2793).
28. The "rated capacity" for Guayama Regional Institution is 240 persons and from 349 to 388 were confined on various dates between April and June, 1980. Guayama is a new institution and has been in use for less than five 23 years. The prisoners *23 from the North part are separated from the prisoners from the South part of Puerto Rico for security reasons.
29. There are no psychiatric services available at the prison and "calabozos" at Guayama, which are similar to those used at Bayamón, are for mental cases and for those seeking asylum. The solid steel doors on the "calabozos" had to be detrimental to the psychotics and non-psychotics housed therein. (Rundle, T. 230).
30. To get on sick call, a prisoner needs the approval of his penal guard, and it is conceded that some sick people get no medical attention. There is a contract physician who is supposed to come to the institution ten hours a week. The sick call schedule, however, varies. There was no dentist at Guayama at the time of the hearing, but there is equipment available.
31. The psychotics, most of whom were in "calabozos", were receiving no psychiatric attention, no medications and no medical treatment of any kind; nor were health records kept. (Hastings, T. 2803).
32. The sanitation, for a new institution, is bad. The bathrooms are covered with water; they are dirty and smelly and the toilet facilities frequently break down. The plumbing fixtures are frequently not functioning. The noise level for the pre-trial detainees is intolerable. (King, T. 675). The films and photographs that the Court saw for Guayama are depressing when one considers that this institution is less than five years old.
33. The Humacao Regional Institution was constructed in 1914 in wood and it has been replaced by concrete throughout. The "rated capacity" is 150, but that number results from a Superior Court Order limiting the institution to no more than 150. It has had as many as 190, and on the days to which testimony is relevant herein, it has always exceeded the 150 number. At 150 inmates, including pre-trial detainees, the average space per inmate for the institution is 23 square feet, but for individual dormitories that number may be less. The plumbing and sanitation is bad; there is no hot water; some beds are broken and a large amount of food has had to be destroyed because of rats and other vermin.
34. The medical care at Humacao is provided by a contract physician who attends six hours, approximately three times a week and a nurse who works full time during the day. The physician only runs a sick call; no physical examinations are given; there is no preventive dental care; there is no psychiatric service provided; there is no one trained in emergency procedures. (Hastings, T. 2636). There is no organized system for handling medications, many of which are kept beyond their expiration date, and there is not even any record kept of medication administered. (Hastings, T. 2637). The medical records are poor (Hastings, T. 2636) and the food handlers do not have current certificates. (Hastings, T. 2639). The refrigeration does not work (King, T. 699) and

no proper medical record keeping is maintained. (Hastings, T. 2641; King, T. 699). The inmates frequently have to purchase their own medications. (King, T. 700).
35. The "calabozos" are constructed as are the "calabozos" in Arecibo; that is, like cages with bars on tops. They have no beds, nor are all of the inmates in them given mattresses. The "calabozos" are hardly ever used for disciplinary matters and they are only used for psychiatric cases or for isolation of sick people and/or protective custody. There have been two suicides in "calabozo"; one during the pendency of these proceedings. The mental case that is presently in "calabozo" has never been examined by a psychiatrist and the only person who has written in his medical record is the nurse.
36. There is no provision in this institution for special diets. (Hastings, T. 2819).
37. The institution cannot physically function with so many people. The kitchen floor is cracked, hot water does not exist even for dishes; toilets do not work; there is exposed wiring in the dormitories; there is no fire extinguisher; (King, T. 702); and there is poor ventilation. (Hastings, T. 2639).
24 *24 38. A cholostomy patient was kept there without having been seen by a doctor and without having replacements of his cholostomy bags. Were it not for the visits of plaintiffs' experts, his health would seriously be impaired. (King, T. 700). The recent suicide was a pretrial detainee sent to "calabozo" because he was to be isolated because of venereal disease. (Hastings, T. 2817-2819).
39. Like Aguadilla and almost every other institution, there are insufficient penal guards. The ration of penal guards to inmate may be as low as 1:18 or 1:20 per shift. This makes it difficult to properly protect the prisoners. There have been 13 attacks, including one stabbing death at Humacao since July 1979. The lack of guards also makes it difficult if not impossible for inmates who have medical treatment pending outside the institution to keep their appointments. (Hastings, T. 2816).
40. Miramar Home for Young Adults is in such a run down condition that the defendants' expert testified that "I would demolish it if I could". (Hastings, T. 2775). Its "rated capacity" is 200 persons, but the population varied, according to the witnesses, from 267 to 278. Although meant to house young adults only, there were adults there. (King, T. 661).
41. There are no maximum security prisoners at Miramar. The "calabozos", which were in a completely isolated area of the building and which may be dangerous for confinement of healthy people and should never be used for persons who have been confined there in the past such as young diabetics, (King, T. 664), were closed. According to the superintendent, he has no intention of reopening them even though two of them are presently under repairs.
42. The rest of the institution is run down. The sanitation conditions in the kitchen and throughout, are bad, but the cleaning procedures are themselves unsanitary. The kitchen is unclean and uncleanable. (Hastings, T. 2616). The floor is cracked, rodents and vermin come through it and the garbage storage is inadequate and uncovered, creating an invitation to flies and the windows are without screens. (Hastings, T. 2617). In the dormitories, the overcrowding is bad, but made worse by the inmate distribution. (Díaz-Royo, T. 1684). In some dormitories the urinals empty into the showers and the lack of cleanliness is so omnipresent that cockroaches are in the medicine chest. (King, T. 661).
43. At Miramar, a contract physician comes to manage a sick call five times a week. The admission to the sick call is via the permission of the prison guards. Most records show no physical examinations; there are no psychological or psychiatric screening procedures and the record keeping is poor and the records are incomplete. Many of the drugs have expired, and the logbook containing the names of the persons who are to receive medications does not match the labels on the bottles or medications of the persons for whom they are intended. (Hastings, T. 2619). The dental equipment appears not to have been used for a long period of time, and such little emergency equipment that is present, like oxygen, cannot be used because there is no wrench to open the cartridges. (King, T. 662). The records of those persons who were thought to be mentally ill were either nonexistent or so sketchy as to be inadequate for any reasonable purpose in terms of an evaluation establishing the diagnosis or any reasonable plan of treatment. (Rundle, T. 207-208).

44. As everywhere throughout the entire system, there is inadequate space for storage of personal possessions such as clothing and towels. (Rundle, T. 211). Miramar, as it exists and as it is operated, has an adverse effect on any one forced to live in such a degree of overcrowding with inadequate sanitary facilities. (Rundle, T. 213). The rage of the inmates against the system is more evident than elsewhere. (Díaz-Royo, T. 1685).
45. The Vega Alta Industrial School for Women is a euphemistic title. It is a prison. The physical plant is run down with exposed wiring, broken plumbing and a large gaping hole in the dining room. The budget for food 25 preparation is $1.15 per *25 person and that figure within 50 cents, is reflective of the budget for food per inmate in each institution. Inmates have to go through the same procedures to see a doctor as they do in the male institutions. Medications are not provided and even patients who demonstrate their need for certain medication may have them withheld. The institution itself does not have sufficient medications and has to go out to the community to seek donations.
46. The medical services are provided by a general practitioner and a psychiatrist, each of whom comes to the institution about four hours a week. The schedule of the general practioner, however, is set by the doctor himself, and no one knows in advance when he is coming. (King, T. 679). The psychiatrist visits the institution on Saturdays (Rundle, T. 244). The medical charts are not up to date, but most of the patients here have had a physical examination (King, T. 680). No record is kept of the administration of medications. The records for the psychiatric patients were deficient and none contained the elements which are generally accepted as necessary to justify the treatment program. (Rundle, T. 245). Less crowded than all other closed institutions, Vega Alta is, nevertheless, similar to all others in the general deterioration, lack of sanitary facilities, inadequate mental and physical examination and treatment.
47. The Bayamón Regional Institution, opened only four years ago as the then panacea for the prisoners who were housed in "La Princesa", which Judge Torruella ordered closed,[10] is the crowning disgrace of the entire penal system in Puerto Rico.[11]
48. Bayamón was built primarily for pretrial detainees. It has a "rated capacity" of 640 inmates. The population figures range from 1,256 on the day of Dr. Rundle's visit, to more than 1,400 on the day the superintendent testified0907May 29, 1980. There has never been less than 1,000 persons for at least two years. There are insufficient guards and the physical plant, the structure, the overcrowding and the lack of socio-penal services and the lack of medical services, including psychiatric services, presents major problems to the Administration.
49. The kitchen facilities are bad. There are open sewers and slow drainage. There are flies throughout the kitchen area; there were rat droppings and cat droppings; no hot water or soap for the kitchen workers; no caps or hair nets; multiple leaking pipes; no screens. (King, T. 690). The kitchen, in the opinion of the defendants' expert, presents a major public health problem. (Hastings, T. 2600).
50. The food appears unpalatable and there is evidence that the Administrator had to instruct the superintendent to give sufficient food. (Cruz de Batista, T. 2036). There is contradictory testimony concerning the availability of special diets. The superintendent testified that Bayamón could provide special diets and the defendants' expert 26 testified that the institution was incapable *26 of providing them. (Hastings, T. 2764). The Court finds that Bayamón does not provide special diets when prescribed by physicians.[12]
51. The amount of food destroyed at Bayamón reaches astronomical proportions. Literally, tons of food have had to be destroyed because of contamination from rats, vermin, worms and spoilage. The Court finds that much of its spoilage stems from the lack of adequate sanitary conditions, poor storage and the lack of proper cleaning techniques.[13] The Court further finds that the conditions in the kitchen are detrimental to the public health of the entire institution and that food poisoning, salmonella, shigellosis, staphylococcal infections and hepatitis are inevitable. (King, T. 696). The food supplied at Bayamón does not include fresh fruits or fresh vegetables, although attempts are made to supply the recommended daily requirements of protein, carbohydrates, fats, vitamins and nutrients. At $1.40 a day or even at $1.75 a day, it is not possible for the Administration to supply a balanced diet.

52. The plumbing throughout the entire institution is a source of public health hazard. The sanitation was found to be inadequate by every person who testified, including the superintendent. According to the defendants' experts, the sewer system was improperly built and there is a structural defect which prevents drainage. The Administration has a civil engineer, but has no sanitation engineer. The chronic overpopulation of Bayamón also causes the plumbing system to become fatigued. (Rivera, T. 1608). The condition in Bayamón is violating the environmental quality law. (Rivera, T. 1610). The toilets do not work; the urinals flush into the sinks; the floors and walls are ruined by seeping water; there has been internal flooding.
53. The plumbing system at Bayamón does not connect with any city sewage system, but empties into open manholes. The manholes overflow. In the opinion of the Administration's engineer, the general plumbing and sanitation situation at Bayamón represents an emergency. (Rivera, T. 1627). The plumbing system at Bayamón is in a state of collapse. (Rivera, T. 1641). There is insufficient supervision and maintenance.
54. The intake section at Bayamón is designated as "Q" which stands for quaranteened area. Here, pretrial detainees are kept. Although built to accommodate 68 persons, as many as 300 or more have been confined in "Q". Because the inmates in "Q" are pretrial detainees, they are not allowed to leave the area for any recreation or exercise. The majority sleep on the floor and many do not even have mattresses. It has always been overcrowded.
55. Most of the toilets in "Q" do not work; the urinals are overflowing; there are few showers and there is water on the floor and the smell of urine and excrement is omnipresent. In the individual cells, (and there is a group on each of the two floors of the "Q" section), young adults are held while awaiting trial. The young adults are placed into these individual cells to protect them from rape. There were, on the day of Dr. Hastings' visit, three young adults in each cell. (Hastings, T. 2586). The overcrowding in "Q" is so severe that it is a public health problem. (Hastings, T. 2735). The excuse for this inhuman treatment of persons who are presumed innocent is just that there is no other place to put them. (Cruz de Batista, T. 2054). The Administration claims that although this situation has existed since Bayamón was opened, that the situation is temporary. (Cruz de Batista, T. 2057). 27 Despite the fact that everyone regards the overcrowding in "Q" in Bayamón *27 to be so severe as to present an emergency situation, no short-term plan has been made nor has any plan been presented to the Governor. (Cruz de Batista, T. 2072).
56. The dormitories, living quarters or modules at Bayamón are all overcrowded. The plumbing is bad in each module and the institution does not supply any articles of personal hygiene. No soap, towels, toothpaste, toothbrush, or underwear are supplied. Toilet paper is supplied, but in such grudging amounts that it may contribute to the disintegration of the plumbing system as inmates seek every means to keep clean. The lack of toilet and other items of personal hygiene is degrading and humiliating.
57. The individual dormitory units are also fire hazards. If there ever had been fire extinguishers and fire hoses, they are missing or destroyed and have never been replaced. There exists no evacuation plan, no disaster plan, nor any medical mobilization plan in the living areas. Because there are so many inmates at Bayamón, recreation and exercise is restricted. The inmates eat in shifts by module and are allowed exercise periods once or twice a week.
58. In Bayamón, there are 140 cells for maximum security. Almost all are occupied by persons who claim that they have enemies in the general population. The majority are occupied by only one inmate. Many toilets in many of the maximum cells do not flush. The inmates who are admitted to maximum, lose their custodial classification and are deprived of their privileges. They do not exercise outside of their cells and they eat in their cells.
59. The "calabozos" at Bayamón, as in Guayama, face a central corridor and have a solid steel door with two slits. The upper slit is so that the confinee can look out and the prison guard can look in; the bottom slit is for passage of a food tray. Except for bathing at the sufferance of the penal guard, the person confined to "calabozo" is not permitted out for any reason. There are 12 "calabozos" and generally more than one person is placed in a single cell. As many as three have been placed in single cells. Seldom are persons placed in "calabozo" for disciplinary reasons. People are placed in "calabozo" for the same reason that they may be placed in maximum0907they are either requesting asylum or they have been labeled psychotic by a prison guard. The

passageway between the "calabozo" is frequently covered with raw sewage because of a broken sewer line in that area. The solid steel door interferes with sensory perception.
60. In the context of the physical setting of the "calabozos", the defendants' expert could find no medical or psychological or practical justification for the existence or use of solid doors in front of the "calabozos". (Hastings, T. 2742-2743). The mental cases that are in "calabozos" have had no psychiatric evaluation; in fact, there is no medical record for those that were there in April or May. No one seemed to have any knowledge as to the length of time persons were kept in "calabozos" at Bayamón. But prisoners who were in "calabozo" there have testified that they have been there for months. No one is given a hearing when placed in "calabozo" despite the fact that it is the Correction Administrator's interpretation of the regulation that everyone placed in a "calabozo" should have a hearing before being put there, or at least seven days after, if they were placed there as an emergency. (Cruz 28 de Batista, T. 1902). The effect of being placed in "calabozo" is destructive to the personality.[14]*28 The risk of depriving fragile personalities of sensory perception is great. (Hastings, T. 2744).
61. No doctor visits the "calabozo". The Court has heard testimony as to persons who have recently died in "calabozo" for lack of medical attention, and the Court finds that on the basis of all the testimony, that there is no justification, medically or psychiatrically, or for any other reason, for the continued existence of the "calabozos".
62. Bayamón Regional Institution serves as the referral point for medical observation and treatment of the entire system. It has a roster of two part-time general practitioners who, combined, work less than 20 hours per week, [15] several specialists, such as ophthalmologist, dermatologist, orthopedist, dental hygienist, radiologist, who are supposed to come for several hours a week, and a psychiatrist, who is supposed to come about ten hours a week. Although the Administrator of Correction stated that she knew that the proper standard was that they should at least have one full-time doctor for every 500 prisoners, there is no full-time doctor in the system. (Cruz de Batista, T. 1883). There is no current regulation concerning medical or psychiatric treatment, but there is a recognition that the American Medical Association's health standards for prisons should be adopted. (Cruz de Batista, T. 1897). There is also a recognition that the system needs at least ten full-time psychologists or psychiatrists. (Cruz de Batista, T. 1903). There is no policy to give physical examinations to pretrial detainees as a matter of course, and in fact, they are not given. Histories are not taken of persons admitted into the system either as pretrial detainees or as convicted persons, nor is there any psychiatric screening of new inmates. There is no internist; there is no official policy and procedures manual; there is no ambulance; there is no stretcher. There is a pharmacy manned by a registered pharmacist, but that does not alleviate the necessity for the inmates having to purchase special prescriptions with their own funds.
63. The physicians on call did not appear for the scheduled sick calls and sick calls are erratic, both as to the time they are held and the duration, and on occasion, the non-qualified Corporal of the guard conducts the sick calls.
64. There have been outbreaks of epidemics of mange, tuberculosis and dengue.[16] No reports or investigations are made of the source of the infectious diseases. The medical records are generally non-existent. Where they do exist, they are by any standards, inadequate. Histories are not taken; physical examinations are not performed; laboratory tests, if made, are not recorded; X-rays, if taken, are not recorded; sick call visits are frequently not recorded.
65. As a referral system for the medical problem cases arising in other institutions, Bayamón is a failure. There are no copies of the consultations made at Bayamón for such prisoners, nor are there duplicate files for such prisoners. Bayamón is not equipped to perform any kind of X-rays, other than chest films. It has no laboratory nor any electrocardiographic machine. The medical area does not come close to fulfilling the needs of those confined in Bayamón, much less referrals from other institutions. (King, T. 692). People are becoming ill and people are 29 dying for lack of medical treatment. *29 There is no way of knowing whether an epidemic is in progress.[17]
66. The total number of psychiatrically ill prisoners is unknown. The estimates run up to 50% or more of the population. Those medical records concerning psychiatric care that do exist are unacceptable by any standard. (Rundle, T. 397). The psychiatric staff does not exist and there is little, if any, contact between the socio-penal worker and the psychiatrist. There is no excuse for not performing acceptable psychiatric evaluations or not

having acceptable medical and psychiatric records, nor not having a sufficient staff to provide the necessary treatment.[18] (Rundle, T. 315). There are probably 200 severely ill psychotics in the prison system who require medical care in a psychiatric hospital and many other hundreds who need intensive psychiatric care within the institution. There has never been any adequate psychiatric screening, and special treatment or isolation is given only to those who are completely disorganized and who are decompensating, or are in a state of cognitive deterioration. This evaluation of the severely mentally ill is now being made in a large part by penal guards who have no specialized training and only rely on their "experience".
67. At Bayamón, the psychotics who are not in "calabozo" are kept in that portion of the maximum security block known as Lower Maximum 1, but which is commonly referred to as "Máxima de Locos".[19] Anywhere from 14 to 18 persons are kept in this area among whom are several "John Does", persons for whom the Administration does not have even a name. The psychiatrist has not been to this area for more than one year and none of the persons confined here have seen a doctor for that period of time. (Hastings, T. 2754). Of the 18 persons who were there on the day of Dr. Rundle's visit, there were medical records for only four. (Rundle, T. 248). The records revealed very little and there was not enough information to determine from the records whether the medication that had been prescribed was appropriate. (Rundle, T. 254-255). Although it has been alleged that some of the persons were placed in this area because they were suicidal, there was no way to know from the record that that is so. If it is so, they are getting the worst possible treatment. (Rundle, T. 266). If someone is dangerously suicidal, he belongs in a psychiatric hospital. (Rundle, T. 266; Hastings, T. 2667). The inmates in "Máxima de Locos" are kept in cells naked, without beds, without mattresses, without any private possessions, and most of them without toilets that work and without drinking water. They are being cared for by an inmate who washes them daily. There is feces all around their cells and the stench is overpowering. Only two of the 18 are receiving any medication. Each of the prisoners now confined in "Máxima de Locos" belong in a psychiatric hospital. (Hastings, T. 2595, 2666; Rundle, T. 279).
30 68. There are 48 other serious mental cases in the psychiatric module, D-1-C *30 Lower.[20] The persons in the psychiatric module do not receive regular medical attention. One of the men that was there when the module was visited by Dr. Rundle, was in a catatonic stupor and his life may have been saved by the intervention of Drs. Rundle and King. (Rundle, T. 262-263; King, T. 768). These inmates are totally neglected, and what attention they get and what records and medications are distributed, come through the efforts of one of their members who writes in the records as if he were a doctor. The persons in D-1-C Lower are unsupervised and are all in a state of cognitive disintegration.
69. There is also a hospital at the Bayamón Regional Institution with 25 beds; 12 of the beds are for the use of the Anti-Addiction Services, who have contracted the services of a doctor and a nurse. That doctor and nurse do not provide even emergency care for anyone who is not their patient. There is no on-site laboratory for the hospital patients. The hospital contains a large gaping hole in the ceiling. The hospital has never received approval from the Secretary of Health, and many of the patients who are there probably do not need intensive hospital care. (Hastings, T. 2590). In the hospital charts, there is no laboratory data, nor are there records of complete physical examination, nor are there histories. (Hastings, T. 2590). The paraplegics who are there in the hospital, occupy four beds and receive no medical treatment. Because they are hospitalized, these paraplegics are precluded from work, study or contact with others. (Hastings, T. 2747). The hospital is not administered by a professional staff, but it is run by the Corporal of the guard together with a night para-medic and prisoners who have some nursing background. Admission to the hospital and hospital care does not seem to relate to known medical standards. The hospital and examining area has no hot water in the doctor's bathroom. (King, T. 686). [21]
70. There is a position in the Central Office of the Administration of Correction called Coordinator of Medical Services. The duties of the Coordinator of Medical Services is to get the individual contract physicians to comply with their contracts; to buy medicines; to make changes in the budget and to coordinate the medical facilities from institution to institution and between the institutions and the community health services. There is no memorandum of standards or guidelines concerning the maintenance of medical records, the maintenance of psychological and psychiatric records, the keeping and recording of doctors' orders and prescriptions, the control of drugs or any other aspect of medical care at the institutions operated by the Administration of Correction.

(Díaz-Delgado, T. 809). There are standard forms for medical histories to be filled out by the patient, standard forms for dental examination and other standard forms relating to physical examinations and prescriptions, but there is no standard utilization of these forms. (Díaz-Delgado, T. 811). There is no program to have inmates examined by a psychiatrist before being sent to the psychiatric wards. (Díaz-Delgado, T. 819). There is no memorandum concerning admissions to either "Máxima de Locos" or to the psychiatric module. (Díaz-Delgado, T. 820). There is no program or any regulations concerning intake physicals for all pretrial detainees, nor for intake physicals at any penal institution. (Díaz-Delgado, T. 820). The dermatologist and cardiologist resigned on May 8, 1980, and had not been replaced by the Medical Coordinator. The Medical Coordinator has never repaired the broken ceiling in the Hospital at Bayamón.
71. There is no program for the detection of viral diseases, dermatological diseases, infectious or venereal 31 diseases and *31 respiratory diseases in any of the institutions operated by the Administration of Correction.
(Díaz-Delgado, T. 830). There is no program for X-rays, for dental inspection, for the detection of epileptics or other neurological disorders. (Díaz-Delgado, T. 831-832). There is no coordination to see that special diets issued upon the orders of a physician are in fact provided. (Díaz-Delgado, T. 833). There have been outbreaks of small epidemics of scabies, of mange and flu at every institution.
72. On the basis of all the evidence, the Court finds that the differences that exist between institution and institution, albeit, dramatic in some instances, is much less pronounced than the similarities. The system is run from a central office, with engineers, financial officers, penal program officers, medical coordinators, dietitians, socio-penal supervisors, records supervisors and budget controllers. Transfers of prisoners may be dictated by the central office, as well as its transfer of personnel. Policy, or the absence of policy, ultimately lies with the Administrator and the executive branch of the Commonwealth Government.
73. Thus, despite the insistence by the defendants and the concurrence by the Court that evidence be presented concerning each of the major institutions, the Court finds that the system is a unitary system and the relief that may be given must be on a system-wide basis.[22]
74. Unsanitary conditions dangerous to the health and life of the inmates exist throughout the system. This includes raw sewage in the kitchens and living spaces, the plumbing breakdowns, the toilets that do not work, the inoperative sinks and showers, the plethora of flies, insects, vermin and rats. The stench of excrement and urine commonly associated with zoos is predominant throughout the system.
75. The physical impositions upon inmates are dangerous to the health and safety of the inmates throughout the system. Lack of beds, doubling upon mattresses, or lack of mattresses, doubling and tripling in individual cells, failure to give sufficient minimal living space, lack of adequate ventilation and the failure to give any articles of personal hygiene or to afford any privacy, is systemic.
76. The "calabozos" are ubiquitously used principally for improperly identified mental cases and for persons who seek asylum from threats of bodily harm. These cells are seldom used for disciplinary purposes, and even then, under conditions that are cruel and unusual. They are all in isolated areas of the respective institutions, all insufficiently attended, insufficiently lighted, most of them without the basic amenities of beds, mattresses, sheets, functioning toilets or drinking water, and all confinees in them are without any exercise, recreation or rehabilitative program.
77. The health care throughout the system leaves much to be desired. There is no program or plan or direction. Intake physical examinations are notable by their absence. There is no systematic record keeping. Records, when they do exist, may not include physical examinations, histories, laboratory tests, X-rays, sick call or progress notes, medication orders or diagnosis. Records for so-called psychiatric patients do not exist, or are 32 sketchy and inadequate by any standard. Medical assistance depends upon persuading a chain of penal *32 guards that the inmate is sick enough to merit examination by a physician or nurse. Inmates die from lack of medical treatment with frightening regularity. Psychotics who should be hospitalized in psychiatric hospitals are kept caged like wild animals with no psychiatric or medical intervention. Others less disorganized are allowed to deteriorate. Medications are not properly dispensed, accounted for, or sometimes not even given without payment by the inmate. Special diets are almost non-existent, even when ordered by the prison physician. Medications necessary for health are not given on any regular basis. X-rays, laboratory tests, preventive medical

and dental care are almost unknown. Epidemics of mange, scabies, respiratory and other infections occur.[23] Outside medical care depends at times upon the sufferance of the penal guards or upon a sufficiently large daily roster of guards so that enough are available to transport the inmates. Medical, psychiatric, psychological, nursing or paramedic staff is woefully small to cope with the number of inmates or the disease-infested environment. Deficiencies in health care and hygiene foster inmate frustration and resentment.
78. Death haunts the prisons. Suicides and stabbings occur from lack of supervision, and the overcrowded conditions where young adults mix with long-term prisoners, where pretrial detainees live in incredible concentration camp-like units along with convicted felons, and where neglect may be so great as to be equated with brutality.[24] The excessive overcrowding, or acute population concentration, rampant in the system, makes adequate supervision of inmates very difficult in all institutions. The extremely high inmate-to-staff ratio negates personal interaction between the two, as the guards must spend most of their time protecting themselves. This specific condition more so than any other nurtures the highly volatile atmosphere which permeates all institutions. [25]
79. The conditions heretofore enumerated are barbaric and shocking. If not stopped, more persons will needlessly die before their time, or will become severely ill. Constitutional violations do exist, and there is no adequate remedy at law.
80. Deference to the Commonwealth authorities to institute long-term solutions, or to defer action until the State Penitentiary reopens, or to wait 120 days for the inauguration of new medical solutions, is unwarranted. The indescribable conditions of confinement in the isolation cells, dungeons ("calabozos") and maximum security cells of the various institutions, as depicted in the photographs admitted into evidence and visually portrayed in the movies shown to the Court, demand from this Court immediate and corrective action.[26]
33 *33 81. An emergency exists and irreparable harm will occur if immediate relief is not granted.[27]
Conclusions of Law
1. The Eighth Amendment provides: "Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel or unusual punishment inflicted." The Eighth Amendment is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment. Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 (1972).
2. Puerto Rico occupies a unique position with relation to the United States and the Supreme Court has never resolved whether the inhabitants of Puerto Rico are protected by the Bill of Rights or by the provisions of the Fourteenth Amendment. Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co., 416 U.S. 663, 94 S.Ct. 2080, 40 L.Ed.2d 452 (1974). Nevertheless, the Supreme Court has categorically stated that regardless of whether the rights of its inhabitants are afforded protection under the Eighth or Fourteenth Amendments, such protection is available through suits filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C., Section 1983, and jurisdiction lies under 28 U.S.C., Section 1343. Examining Board of Engineers, Architects and Surveyors v. Flores de Otero, 426 U.S. 572, 96 S.Ct. 2264, 49 L.Ed.2d 65 (1976).
3. Pretrial detainees, however, are not prisoners and their restraint is justifiable under either the Fifth Amendment or the Fourteenth Amendment, provided that their restraint is not punished or the conditions and restrictions imposed upon them do not otherwise violate the Constitution. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979).
4. Absent an intent to punish, if the restriction or condition of pretrial detention is arbitrary or purposeless in relation to the maintenance of the effective management of the detention facility and to insure the detainee's presence at trial, then a court may infer that the purpose of the governmental action is punishment that may not constitutionally be inflicted upon detainees qua detainees. Bell v. Wolfish, supra, 441 U.S. at 538, 99 S.Ct. at 1874.

5. The overcrowding, lack of sanitation, the absence of health facilities or adequate medical or psychological services, the triple bunking of young adults, the failure to protect the pretrial detainees from attack, constitute punishment, whether intended or not.
6. The Eighth Amendment proscribes more than physically barbarous punishment. Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976) (Joint Opinion of Stewart, Powell and Stevens, JJ.). Punishments which are incompatible with "the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society" are repugnant to the Eighth Amendment. Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 78 S.Ct. 590, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958).
7. Embodied within the Eighth Amendment are "broad and idealistic concepts of dignity, civilized standards, humanity and decency ...", Jackson v. Bishop, 404 F.2d 571, 579 (8 Cir., 1968) and prohibitions of treatment which "involve the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain." Gregg v. Georgia, supra, 428 U.S. at 171-173, 96 S.Ct. 2925 at 2924-25 as quoted in Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 102-103, 97 S.Ct. 285, 290, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976).
8. The government's obligation to provide medical care, recognized in the legislation of Puerto Rico, if not 34 properly met, may produce physical torture or lingering *34 death in the worst cases and in less serious cases,
may result in pain and suffering. Deliberate indifference to the serious medical needs of the inmates constitutes "unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain" proscribed by the Eighth and Fifth Amendments. Estelle v. Gamble, supra, at 104, 97 S.Ct. at 291.
9. The medical program or better said, the lack of it, in the institutions operated by the Puerto Rico Administration of Correction violates the Constitution.[28]
10. If individually, any one of the following practices does not violate the Constitutional interdictions, the combination of them does. The failure to have a medical director; the failure to employ any full-time medical or psychiatric personnel; the failure to provide intake examinations of all pretrial and convicted persons; the failure to maintain proper medical records or standards; the failure to permit direct access from the prisoner to the medical authorities; the failure to provide articles of hygiene; the failure to screen the mentally ill, or if screened, the failure to afford meaningful treatment; the failure to hospitalize the seriously ill; the failure to provide medically ordered special diets; the failure to provide needed prescriptions; the failure to provide meaningful dental care; the isolation of the known psychotics without clothing, functioning sanitary facilities, treatment or medication; the failure to screen epileptics, diabetics, tubercular inmates or persons suffering from kidney or other diseases; the unsupervised isolation of inmates who have made suicidal threats; the close juxtaposition of ill and healthy; the failure to stop disease-producing unhygienic conditions, like open kitchen drains, raw sewage in dormitories and elsewhere; permitting the infestation of food and clothing by lice, scabies, rats and other vermin; and the failure to have any medical planning, emergency equipment and procedures and disaster plans.
11. Solitary confinement is not per se unconstitutional. If the segregated confinement involves neither intolerable isolation, nor inadequate food, heat, sanitation, lighting or bedding, and if the confinement is short-termed, and properly supervised with no lack of necessary medical attention, it offends no Constitutional prohibition. O'Brien v. Moriarity, 489 F.2d 941 (1 Cir., 1974).
12. Isolation, for any reason, without adequate sanitary conditions, is unconstitutional. Wright v. McMann, 387 F.2d 519 (2 Cir., 1967); Hancock v. Avery, 301 F.Supp. 786 (M.D.Tenn., 1969); Jordan v. Fitzharris, 257 F.Supp. 674 (N.D.Cal., 1974); Novak v. Beto, 453 F.2d 661 (5 Cir., 1971).
13. Isolation, for prolonged periods of time without exercise and recreation, is unconstitutional. Sinclair v. Henderson, 331 F.Supp. 1123 (E.D.La., 1971); Laaman v. Helgemoe, 437 F.Supp. 269 (D.N.H., 1977).
14. Isolation which threatens the physical health of prisoners and which interferes with medical attention is 35 unconstitutional. *35 Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291 (5 Cir., 1974); Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F.Supp. 122 (D.Colo.,
1979).
15. Solitary confinement of young adults is unconstitutional. Morales v. Turman, 364 F.Supp. 166 (E.D.Tex., 1973) ; Inmates of Boys' Training School v. Affleck, 346 F.Supp. 1354 (D.R.I., 1972).[29]

16. Solitary confinement of psychiatric patients without supervision, without treatment and without medication, is cruel and barbaric. Laaman v. Helgemoe, supra.
17. The use of the solitary confinement cells known as "calabozos" for housing persons voluntarily seeking protective custody, accompanied frequently as it is with multiple prisoners per cell, lack of any exercise, lack of working toilets, no drinking water, no ventilation, unbearable heat and insufficient light, with the accompanying loss of work privileges and change in classification, constitutes arbitrary and cruel punishment.
18. The "calabozos" in the Puerto Rico's prisons physically violate the Eighth Amendment proscriptions. They are isolated from the rest of the prisons, attended irregularly, they contain insufficient space, light and ventilation, are overpoweringly destructive, and some are invitations to suicide. "With or without improvements" their continued use "cannot be suffered in a society governed by our Constitution". Laaman v. Helgemoe, supra, at 323.
19. The punishment of persons because they are mentally disturbed is unconscionable and barbaric. Isolation without clothes or bedding in "calabozos" or in filthy stinking maximum security cells of mentally ill persons, not only violates all modern treatment practices, but also offends all notions of civilized behavior of humanity. Estelle v. Gamble, supra; McCray v. Burrell, 516 F.2d 357 (4 Cir., 1975).
20. The failure to hospitalize known mentally ill under conditions where the penal institution personnel know that they cannot provide medical or psychiatric services constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F.2d 44 (4 Cir., 1977).
21. Overcrowding is not per se a violation of the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. Nor is this Court bound by a standard of "rated capacity" set by the institution or any of the organizations who have published standards[30] for jails and prisons. According to Chapman v. Rhodes, 434 F.Supp. 1007, 1021 (S.D.Ohio, 1977), the American Correctional Institute has set 75 square feet, the National Sheriffs' Association Handbook on Jail Architecture calls for 70-80 square feet for single occupancy detention, and its Manual on Jail Administration sets 55 square feet as minimal for multiple celling. In 1969, the Army standard was 55 square feet and the National Council on Crime and Delinquency Model Act for the Protection of the Rights of Prisoners concluded that not less than 50 square feet of floor space in any confined living area should be provided. The court in Chapman, supra, held that double celling in 60-foot cells was federally unconstitutional.
36 *36 Other cases require space limits of 70 square feet or 75 square feet in dormitories that is the concern of this suit, Battle v. Anderson, 564 F.2d 388 (10 Cir., 1977); Palmigiano v. Garrahy, 443 F.Supp. 956 (D.R.I., 1977); Anderson v. Redman, 429 F.Supp. 1105 (D.Del., 1977), or as low as 50 square feet of space. Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291 (5 Cir., 1974). This Court has previously set the 70 square feet minimum as constitutional requirement in Martínez Rodríguez v. Jiménez, 409 F.Supp. 582 (D.P.R., 1976). In view of the most recent decisions, especially Williams v. Edwards, 547 F.2d 1206 (5 Cir., 1977); Jordan v. Wolke, 460 F.Supp. 1080, 1086-1089 (E.D. Wis., 1978); and Bell v. Wolfish, supra, this Court rejects any approach that will determine any fixed amount of minimum space as constitutional.
22. The actual square footage in the dormitories of Puerto Rico prisons is closer to 20 square feet and does not approximate any suggested standard. In some areas, such as Aguadilla, Ponce, Miramar and the "A" Sections of Bayamón and Guayama, the space is almost non-existent. The dormitories in all these institutions are all lacking in space, sanitation, ventilation and are such firetraps that in some places the inmates are not confined during day-light hours, but allowed to move about within the confines of the institutions. Nevertheless, this mobility is not synonymous with recreation. It is the Court's conclusion that the space provided in the dormitories of the closed institutions, when considered together with the poor sanitary facilities and the insufficient light and ventilation and lack of privacy, are all unconstitutional.
23. There has been no suggestion that the individual cells at Río Piedras Maximum Unit, Bayamón or Guayama, are constitutionally improper for single cell occupancy. They are ample, provided that the toilets work and the inmates are provided beds, bedding and drinking water. This Court would permit, if it be required for short periods of time, double occupancy of these cells with the same provisions. The cells are too small for triple occupancy.

24. With the exception of the Vega Alta Industrial School for Women and the Maximum Security Unit at Río Piedras, every closed institution operated by the Administration of Correction is unconstitutionally overcrowded.
25. The inmates who require special medications or special diets are being cruelly punished when such medication or special diet is withheld. Pugh v. Locke, 406 F.Supp. 318 (M.D.Ala., 1976); Mitchell v. Untreiner, 421 F.Supp. 886 (N.D.Fla., 1976); Westlake v. Lucas, 537 F.2d 857 (6 Cir., 1976); Goldsby v. Carnes, 429 F.Supp. 370 (W.D.Mo., 1977); Laaman v. Helgemoe, supra.

Remedies

"Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court's equitable powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for breadth and flexibility are inherent in equitable remedies." Smith v. Sullivan, 553 F.2d 373, 381 (5 Cir., 1977), citing Chief Justice Burger in Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). Moreover, inadequate resources, which has been the main thrust of defendants' arguments, can never justify depriving any person of his constitutional rights. Gates v. Collier, 501 F.2d 1291, 1309 (5 Cir., 1974); Shapiro v. Thompson, 394 U.S. 618, 89 S.Ct. 1322, 22 L.Ed.2d 600 (1969).

Our Court of Appeals has suggested caution in ordering remedies without considering administrative convenience or expense. Nadeau v. Helgemoe, 561 F.2d 411, 417 (1 Cir., 1977). On the other hand, when faced with pervasive failure of responsible authorities to maintain the Essex County Jail in Massachusetts in conformity with constitutional requisites, it held that the district court did not abuse its discretion in ordering the jail closed if certain mandated corrections were not implemented. Dimarzo v. Cohill, 575 F.2d 15 (1 Cir., 1978). There, at pages 19-20, the Court said:

37

*37 "Faced with unconstitutional conditions, the court ordered that the facility be brought within

constitutional parameters. The remedy does not exceed the constitutional violation. See Milliken v.

Bradley, 418 U.S. 717, 744-745, 94 S.Ct. 3112, 3126-3127, 41 L.Ed.2d 1069 (1974) (Milliken I).

The mandated changes are modest in nature, fair to the inmates and not oppressive to the

Correction authorities. We conclude that, on the facts of this case, the order of the district court is

`reasonable, feasible, and workable'. Swann v. Board of Education, [Swann v. Charlotte-

Mecklenburg Board of Education, supra] supra, 402 U.S. at 31, 91 S.Ct. 1267, at 1283.

"We do not understand defendant Hall's complaint to lie with the specifically mandated changes, but rather with the trump card held by the district court, namely, the threat of ordering Essex closed if the changes are not made. We find neither error nor abuse of discretion in the court's action. A district court can order changes which will force the state to expend funds. Milliken v. Bradley, 433 U.S. 267, 288-291, 97 S.Ct. 2749, 2761-2762, 53 L.Ed.2d 745 (1977) (Milliken II); Edelman v. Jordan, 415 U.S. 651, 667-668, 94 S.Ct. 1347, 1357-1358, 39 L.Ed.2d 662 (1974); Martínez Rodríguez v. Jiménez, 537 F.2d 1 (1 Cir., 1976). If the legislature should balk at allocating funds for court ordered changes, an appropriate remedy for a court to choose, at least conflicting with the principles of federalism and the separation of powers, is to order the facility closed. See Rhem v. Malcolm, 507 F.2d 333, 399 ([2] Cir., 1974); Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. Kearney, 573 F.2d 98 (1 Cir., 1978)."

Balancing as we must, the rights of the inmates with the duties of the state officials to operate their facilities with that degree of discretion and within the confines of their budgetary allowances as provided by state law, we conclude that certain conditions can no longer be tolerated. The "calabozos" must go. There is no justification for using these cells for mentally ill or to isolate persons with communicable diseases. There is no justification for ever putting a pretrial detainee in such a chamber. While persons who seek asylum or protective custody may forfeit certain privileges, there is no constitutional justification for imposing added punishment upon such persons by confining them in this type of cell. Even if they were to be used for disciplinary purposes, only, these cells do not pass constitutional muster. They are so far removed from the rest of the institution or in such an isolated area that there is no hope of anyone placed in such a cell receiving adequate supervision, food, water, sanitation or medical facilities.

The psychotics must be removed from the penal institutions. Nothing we have seen is more depressing than the sight of young men totally out of contact with their surroundings and reality, stripped naked and left to their delusions and hallucinations without the benefit of working toilets, toilet paper, drinking water, beds, mattresses or linen, human attention, medical care or medications. The prisons cannot cope with these sick persons. All the identified psychotics or severe mentally ill must be removed forthwith and placed by the Commonwealth in proper psychiatric hospitals.[31]
Every incoming inmate, whether pretrial detainee or convicted prisoner must have a complete screening medical examination within one week from the date of his admission. To have such an examination presupposes the existence of proper systems or record keeping, regular annotations in the records and adequate personnel and 38 staff to *38 maintain the records. It also presupposes the existence of laboratory testing for basic purposes such as the determination of tuberculosis and venereal disease, as well as X-ray equipment. Physical examinations must be taken by trained personnel who take their own personal histories and do not rely upon the inmates who may have varying degrees of literacy, to fill out forms.
Not only must there be medical screening of the inmates, there must also be psychiatric screening to determine which inmates are so seriously ill as to require hospitalization in a psychiatric facility outside the Administration of Correction and to determine which require treatment and the intensity of such treatment within the penal institutions. Psychiatric examinations presuppose trained personnel under the supervision of qualified psychiatrists. The Court is not in a position to direct the institutions that they must employ so many psychiatrists and so many psychologists or so many psychiatric nurses or psychiatric social workers, but it should be obvious to all that housing 4,200 persons and accepting responsibility for their medical and psychiatric well-being makes it obligatory that the Administration of Correction place the medical care under the supervision of a full-time medical director who has as his assistant a full-time director of psychiatric services.
Medical and psychiatric screening of just the incoming inmates will not alleviate the medical problems. A complete screening of the penal population must be done at once. Teams of doctors and nurses may be necessary, but the health and lives of the inmates can no longer be left to blind chance. The authorities must know which inmate is diabetic, which has a kidney problem, which a respiratory infection, as well as which has a communicable disease.
Each inmate who enters the penal population or the pretrial detainee population of the facilities operated by the Administration of Correction is entitled to continue to receive any life-supporting medication, prescription or special diet that he had in civilian life. Each inmate has the right to receive medications, prescriptions and diets as they have been prescribed by a physician while the inmate is incarcerated. It may prove more cost effective to locate such prisoners in a single unit, but that is not the concern of the Court.
It should be apparent from all of the reported opinions in this field that the conditions under which prisoners and pretrial detainees are kept in Puerto Rico are barbaric by any legal standard. The overcrowding appears worse than in any other reported decision, and the sanitation and public health standards employed are among the poorest that one could imagine. The Court is not going to order that all the prisons in Puerto Rico be closed. When La Princesa was closed, the description of the conditions as they existed there does not impress the Court as being worse than what was seen in the films and photographs concerning the remaining facilities in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
The Court also will not appoint a Master to operate the facilities at this time. The failure of the officials of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to perform the duties imposed upon them by statute and the Constitution is more than casual indifference. It approaches a deliberate attempt to inflict pain and suffering. Nevertheless, without foreclosing the possibility of such an appointment in the future, or of any other remedy that may be necessary, the Court is of the opinion that the Commonwealth officials must learn to run their own prisons.
The conditions cannot be corrected overnight. However, constitutional rights cannot be delayed because the correction of certain conditions is either difficult or costly. Throughout the hearing, the defendants have tried to assure the Court that the conditions were being remedied and that with the opening of the State Penitentiary in July many of the plaintiffs' complaints would disappear. July has come and gone and the State Penitentiary has

not opened. The only other planned construction for which appropriations are made are at Fajardo and a new 39 young adult detention center at the Zarzal prison camp. The Court *39 does not believe that these additions will
alleviate the overcrowding pressure.[32]
The prisons will have to be kept in a cleaner and more sanitary condition, or in a condition which does not represent an environmental control problem on the outside and a public health problem in the inside. Prisoners cannot live in the overcrowded conditions in which they now live. Although the Court does not think it is sufficient, for temporary purposes, within a period not to exceed six months, each prisoner in Puerto Rico shall be provided with at least 35 square feet of space for himself and his belongings. The 35 square feet of space may not be halved by the mere expedient of doubled tiered bunking in dormitories.
The following order is entered as an emergency order for temporary and provisional relief. It is merely a stopgap to comply with what the defendants' expert stated were the goals of a prison system from a health standpoint. He said that the primary purpose was to prevent death; secondly, to prevent disease; thirdly, to prevent disability; then to prevent disruption of the Administration or flow of services; to prevent dissatisfaction among the inmates; and finally, to prevent discomfort. As the prison system in Puerto Rico now functions, it prevents none of these things. It is therefore,
ORDERED, that all "calabozos" or dungeons or isolation cells in each of the closed institutions operated by the Administration of Correction be and hereby are closed; and it is further
ORDERED, that no such similar cells shall be constructed or used in any facility operated by the Administration of Correction; and it is further
ORDERED, that all persons presently confined in a "calabozo" cell because they are mentally unfit and all persons presently confined in the unit known as Lower Maximum 1 (Máxima de Locos), at Bayamón Regional Institution, be forthwith transferred to psychiatric hospitals; and it is further
ORDERED, that all persons presently confined in the unit known as the "psychiatric module" of D-1-C Lower at the Bayamón Regional Institution or in the dormitories for the mentally ill at Aguadilla (Galera de Locos), or any other person confined in any other ward or any facility operated by the Administration of Correction and labeled as mentally unfit, be examined by a qualified psychiatrist within ten (10) days from the date of this Order to determine whether said psychiatrist recommends treatment of such persons in a psychiatric hospital, or whether treatment can be continued under proper psychiatric guidance within the penal institutions; and it is further
ORDERED, that henceforth and from the date of this Order, neither the Administrator of Correction nor any person operating as an employee, servant, agent or contracting party with the Administration of Correction, may place known psychotics or severely mentally ill persons in any isolation cell or in any other cell or dormitory or ward, without constant attention and medical care, and shall, if the medical conditions so warrant, transfer such inmate to a psychiatric hospital; and it is further
ORDERED, that not later than September 22, 1980, the defendants, or any of them, shall notify the Court that a full-time medical director has been appointed for not less than one year; and it is further
ORDERED, that if the defendants do not appoint a medical director within said time, the Court, as a provisional measure only, will appoint a medical director to serve until a full-time, permanent director is appointed by the defendants; and it is further
40 *40 ORDERED, that the medical director appointed shall forthwith institute unified plans and procedures for the maintenance of medical records, standardize the contents of medical records and order that all information of a medical nature, including history, physical examination, laboratory tests and their results, X-rays and their results, diagnoses, doctors' orders, prescriptions and medications given, inter alia, be included in each such record; and it is further
ORDERED, that the medical director appointed shall be empowered to employ such staff of professionals, be they doctors, nurses, paramedics, psychiatrists, psychologists, psychiatric nurses, psychiatric social workers,

dentists and dental hygienists as may be necessary to provide adequate medical care and attention to the entire penal population; and it is further
ORDERED, that within one week from his appointment, the medical director shall establish procedures for the medical screening of each incoming pretrial detainee or prisoner, which shall include a complete physical examination and such tests as may be necessary to diagnose tuberculosis, venereal disease, epilepsia, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or any communicable disease; and it is further
ORDERED, that from the commencement of the screening of all incoming inmates, each inmate shall be screened medically and psychologically within one week from the date of his entry into the custody of the Administration of Correction of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; and it is further
ORDERED, that among the persons to be employed by the medical director shall be a psychiatrist who shall be in charge of the psychiatric care for emotionally and mentally disturbed inmates; and it is further
ORDERED, that the psychiatrist in charge employed by the medical director shall forthwith establish procedures for the psychiatric screening of all incoming inmates into the facilities operated by the Administration of Correction; and it is further
ORDERED, that those incoming inmates who require hospital treatment in a psychiatric institution shall be transferred thereto and that those incoming inmates who require intensive psychiatric treatment shall have such treatment provided as is necessary; and it is further
ORDERED, that the psychiatric screening of all incoming inmates shall commence within one week from the appointment of the psychiatrist in charge, whose appointment shall be made within one week of the appointment of the medical director; and it is further
ORDERED, that within two months from the date of this Order the medical director shall cause the entire existing population in the custody of the Administration of Correction to be screened with a complete physical examination and psychiatric examination for the detection of any chronic disorder or any communicable disease; and it is further
ORDERED, that the screening of the entire population of the facilities operated by the Administration of Correction shall be completed within three months of the date it is commenced; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Administration of Correction shall provide to each incoming inmate, whether pretrial detainee or convicted person, soap, towels, toothpaste and toothbrush, commencing immediately; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Administration of Correction shall provide all presently confined pretrial detainees and convicted persons, soap, towels, toothpaste and toothbrush, and that such items shall be completely distributed within sixty (60) days from the date of this Order; and it is further
ORDERED, that all food handlers shall be required to have had a physical examination and tests for tuberculosis or venereal disease; and it is further
ORDERED, that such examinations shall be provided to food handlers hereafter so that no food handler shall be more than six (6) months on job duty without such an examination; and it is further
41 *41 ORDERED, that all food handlers be provided caps or hairnets for use while handling foods; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Administration of Correction shall immediately repair the plumbing and sewage system at the Bayamón Regional Institution; and it is further
ORDERED, that a report concerning said repairs shall be filed with this Court within one month from the date of this order; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Administrator of Correction shall, at the time of filing said report, also report on the repairs and modifications of the sanitary and sewage system of all other closed institutions and any other steps taken to improve said conditions; and it is further

ORDERED, that the Administrator of Correction take the necessary steps to insure that each inmate, whether prisoner or pretrial detainee, be afforded no less than thirty five (35) square feet of living and sleeping space. This goal of 35 square feet per inmate shall be achieved in stages as necessary within six (6) months from the date of this order; and it is expressly provided that said space requirement of 35 square feet is a temporary measure only; and it is further
ORDERED, that plans shall be submitted within ninety (90) days from the date of this Order showing the steps the Administration of Correction is taking to provide no less than 70 square feet per individually celled inmate and 55 square feet for inmates housed in dormitories, provided that said space limitations be accompanied by detailed plans for time out of cells by the inmates in restricted dormitories; and it is further
ORDERED, that henceforth no inmate or pretrial detainee shall be denied any medication prescribed by a qualified physician, nor shall any inmate be denied a special diet prescribed by a qualified physician, unless said prescription is rescinded for medical reasons by the medical director appointed; and it is further
ORDERED, that the injunction ordered herein is considered to be a claim separate and apart from other claims, including those for costs and attorneys' fees within the context of Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
There is no just reason for delay, and the Clerk of this Court is instructed to enter this Opinion and Order forthwith as a judgment so that this Order be made immediately appealable.
This Court shall maintain continuing jurisdiction over the enforcement of these Orders, and in order to permit the plaintiffs an opportunity to contest any report or statement filed by the Administration of Correction, it is
ORDERED, that the seven plaintiffs' attorneys who appeared at trial shall be permitted to enter into any of the institutions operated by the Administration of Correction and to confer with their clients and to inspect any of the conditions covered in this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] Because of the nature of the Emergency and Extraordinary Relief requested by Plaintiffs, the Court was very restrained in allowing evidence on the record of past violations. Nevertheless, a trickle of testimony made its way into the record which evinces that the genesis of the present conditions of confinement has its roots in years gone by. The thrust of the evidence presented covered the years 1977-78, 1978-79, and 1979-80. Yet, even at least since 1960 the inmates at the State Penitentiary were receiving very deficient medical, psychiatric and therapeutic treatment; were complaining of receiving cruel and inhuman punishment; and throughout the system the inmates were living in subhuman conditions, which "... did not begin three years ago ...". (Cruz de Batista, T. 1834-35, 1837-38, 1879). See also footnote 2, infra.
[2] Efraín Montero Torres v. Rafael Hernández Colón, Civil 75-828, filed by the inmates of La Pica, one of the minimum security camps, ended by stipulation and order requiring the Administrator of Correction to provide the Parole Board with psychological and other information that it was legislatively ordered to amass so that the Parole Board would be in position to act. In essence, the prisoners were being deprived of statutory due process and equal protection of the laws when parole eligible prisoners were denied consideration for parole when the Parole Board could not decide their case for lack of information.
The Montero Torres case was reopened by a pro se intervenor in 1977. Roberto Morales Escudero had his intervention transformed into a class action which attacked the gamut of parole procedures. The critical event in that case was a scheduled hearing to hold the former and present Governors, the present and former Administrators of Correction and the former and then current members of the Parole Board in contempt for violation of the Order entered in the Montero Torres case. As the then Magistrate, the Court acted as mediator of an eight-day settlement conference that ended in another stipulation and order that was detailed as to each step and requirement of the parole deciding process. Substantial fees were awarded court-appointed counsel who, with one addition, are the same corps of attorneys representing plaintiffs in this case.

The Morales Escudero order was followed by another class-action intervention, that of Juan Serrano Martínez, which also ended by stipulation and order, refining the procedures set down in the Morales Escudero order of October 1, 1977, and requiring specific standardization of action by the prison authorities in classification and treatment of prisoners for parole purposes. This was followed by yet another action to hold named defendants in contempt for failure to comply with orders of this Court, the intervention of Pedro Jiménez Alvarado. That action was tried and a fine assessed if compliance were not made by a date certain.
Another class action by federal prisoners claiming that their Eighth Amendment Rights were violated by their conditions of confinement in the now extinct "La Princesa" was settled by the federal authorities removing pretrial detainees and prisoners to the State Penitentiary. But then the state prisoners brought suit and a trial was had, and that particular institution was ordered closed. Martínez Rodríguez v. Jiménez, 409 F.Supp. 582 (D.P.R., 1976), affirmed on petition for a stay order, 537 F.2d 1 (1 Cir., 1976). The State Penitentiary then was voluntarily closed for repairs and remodeling after successive suits claiming intolerable conditions of confinement, first by federal inmates and then by Commonwealth prisoners. The federal prisoners successfully closed Bayamón Regional Institution insofar as they only were concerned, and the federal female prisoners have had their lot improved at the Vega Alta Industrial School for Women. Both these institutions still house local prisoners.
All of these later cases concerning conditions of confinement have ended with the plaintiff prevailing by last minute settlement stipulation. The present action seeks for the first time Island-wide equitable and injunctive relief for ten separate claims for relief, including conditions of confinement. It also seeks damages for individual intervening prisoners whose particular rights are alleged to have been violated.
[3] Four of the five experts testified during the hearing and their testimony will be properly identified below.
[4] The Draft Standards of the Federal Department of Justice and the American Medical Association Standards for Jails. Allusion has been made by various witnesses to other standards and the American Correctional Standards and American Bar Association Standards have also been checked by the Court.
[5] Law 116 of July 22, 1974.
[6] The right of convicted persons to humane treatment is not eschewed by reason of their confinement. They are guaranteed the provision of life's basic needs for the period of their incarceration. Bowring v. Godwin, 551 F.2d 44 (4 Cir., 1977).
[7] The Court is aware that substantial deference to prison officials is required. Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979); Procunier v. Martínez, 416 U.S. 396, 94 S.Ct. 1800, 40 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974); Jones v. North Carolina Prisoners' Labor Union, Inc., 433 U.S. 119, 97 S.Ct. 2532, 53 L.Ed.2d 629 (1977). But this policy cannot interfere with the duty to protect constitutional rights. Procunier v. Martínez, supra; Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319, 92 S.Ct. 1079, 31 L.Ed.2d 263 (1972). Government entities have no discretion to violate the Constitution. Owen v. City of Independence, Missouri, 445 U.S. 622, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 63 L.Ed.2d 673 (1980). Once a court finds that an Eighth Amendment violation exists, it is obligated to remedy the situation. Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976); Battle v. Anderson, 564 F.2d 388, 392-393 (10 Cir., 1977); Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153, 96 S.Ct. 2909, 49 L.Ed.2d 859 (1976); Smith v. Sullivan, 611 F.2d 1039, 1044 (5 Cir., 1980); Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 98 S.Ct. 2565, 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978); Ramos v. Lamm, 485 F.Supp. 122 (D.Colo., 1979).
[8] Testimony concerning the first eight of these institutions will be reviewed in these Findings of Fact. The Court compelled the parties to present evidence concerning conditions in the several institutions separately, in case certain remedies were to be ordered against specific institutions, or, in the case the Court were to find that the system was not an integrated one.
[9] The State Penitentiary at Río Piedras has been shut down for repairs during the pendency of this lawsuit. The defendants' witnesses have referred to the reopening of that institution as if that opening would magically eliminate all the violations and solve all the problems of the penal system. The State Penitentiary will reopen on September 3, 1980, but the Court can make no findings as to how much that reopening will alleviate any of the

problems in the other closed institutions. As of the date of the hearing ended, there was no evidence as to what kind of prisoners would be housed in the reopened facilities.
[10] Martínez Rodríguez v. Jiménez, 409 F.Supp. 582, 587-588, 592, (D.P.R., 1976).
[11] The Court was appalled viewing the motion picture and the still photographs. It must be much worse to visit it. The impressions of the witnesses convey, better than can the Court, the effect that Bayamón has upon the visitor. Dr. Rundle, in answer to a question posed by the Court, said at pages 413-414:
"(E)very time that I have been in a prison whether it was at Soledad when I went there to work for five years, in New York, or just on a visit, I come out depressed to some degree. And I have certainly been in situations which were very bad and were certainly very depressing. But I think the point I was making was that the concentration of the horrors was greater there by a mode and much greater subjective affect upon me and I think also upon some of the others who were with me.
"Doctor King, for example, he and I talked about that and there came a certain point we just felt we had to get out of there. We could not deal with it any more."
The Administrator of Correction, in response to the following question: "You have been in office three years and in those three years would you see that the people in Bayamón have been living in sub-human conditions?" answered: "Yes, but that did not begin three years ago." (Cruz de Batista, T. 1879-1881). See footnote 1, supra.
[12] The Court finds that the superintendent of Bayamón was not a credible witness. The Court admonished this witness because he was evasive (T. 526). Whenever conflicting evidence as to actual conditions appeared in the record, the Court finds that the testimony of the trained expert observers is in every instance more credible than those of the employees of the institutions.
[13] "I never visited a kitchen (before) where there was no soap for the institution." (King, T. 690).
[14] Dr. Díaz-Royo testified, at 1717:
"Aside from the despair and despondency, we cannot establish, but we can say that if the person had some mental disturbance prior to "calabozo", with some certainty I can say he will not get better. He will deteriorate, if he was angry he will get angrier. If he was [non] cognative or [had] defective organization, it will be worse at that level if you have something prior to that. Now if you were a healthy human being and you were put in calabozo your memory is going to be impaired somehow, your problem solving abilities are going to deteriorate as has been demonstrated in experimental work ..."
The effect could be permanent. He testified at 1718:
"If you have what has been called the premorbid personality0907and premorbity doesn't mean you are crazy, it means that you are vulnerable as all healthy humans, human beings are vulnerable if put under undue stress. "If you have certain premorbid traits which the calabozo situation particularly hits your structure, personality structure, you might permanently be impaired."
[15] No expert who visited the institution ever met either of these general practitioners, no matter what day of the week or what time the inspection was made. When they were called by both Dr. King and Dr. Hastings for an interview, they could not be reached or would they come.
[16] There is also a high incidence of venereal disease, but venereal disease is checked semi-annually through an agency of the federal government and most of the victims are identified and treated. Although venereal disease is prevalent, the most virulent are under control from the standpoint of public health.
[17] It is depressing to relate the testimony and the impressions of the experts.
"Relative to the number of people that are confined, I have not seen any system in which there was such an absolute lack of qualified staff available and I have not seen any system in which there was such an absolute lack of thoughtful direction or leadership or procedures. There was a complete absence of any kind of systemic

planning and the kind of care that emerges as a result of lack of resources and the conditions, I would characterize as systemic malpractice, both medically and administratively." (King, T. 703).
"There is almost no reasonable medical care provided." (Rundle, T. 286).
[18] The Court agrees with the following statement:
"A prison system takes command of a man totally and therefore, must accept the responsibility for providing for certain basic necessities, one of which is medical care and that includes psychiatric care. As far as I am concerned, when a man goes into a prison system, he must receive a medical examination, which should include a screening psychiatric examination by some one who is specially trained." (Rundle, T. 321).
[19] Translation is Maximum Security for the crazy.
[20] The defendants' expert was never advised about these people. He was under the impression that there were only 40 identified severely psychiatrically ill in the entire penal system. (Hastings, T. 2753).
[21] There is no place within the hospital area to isolate any inmate with infectious or contagious disease. (Peterson, T. 727). Release from the hospital may be by a penal guard authority as well as by a doctor. (Peterson, T. 727).
[22] By the third day of the hearing, the evidence was mounting that the commonality of the faults was much greater than the difference. During a colloquy, the Court stated: (T. 360-361)
"(I)f the system is a unitary system as it apparently is where the central administration is carried out by the director here in San Juan and it applies to all the institutions through the superintendent, assistants, wardens and whatever, I am not going to enter an order specifically for each institution. If I do enter an order, it will be addressed to the Administrator of Correction and that the Administrator would be the one in charge or the overseer to see that the Court orders are carried out....
"...
"And if there is one institution for example, let's talk about the calabozos. There is an order issued about closing calabozos and there is only one institution that uses them, that's better for the Administrator. She only has to close one instead of seventeen...."
[23] In the Regional Institution of Bayamón alone, at a given time, approximately 200 inmates out of a population of 1265 were suffering from mange, or roughly 17%. During the same period of time anywhere from 200 to 300 inmates failed the tuberculosis tests, or roughly between 17% and 24%. (Maldonado-Vázquez, T. 528, 532).
[24] Although the Court heard evidence concerning "calabozo" deaths which involved alleged beatings by prison officials, no findings of physical brutality are made. The proof is insufficient and brutality was not an issue framed by the show cause order. Suggestions of brutality appear interspersed throughout the record, especially in the testimony of the prisoners.
[25] Contrary to defendants' expert's testimony to the effect that the level of tension at Bayamón Regional Institution was quite low (Dr. Hasting, T. 2587, 2754), the plaintiffs' experts perceived in their visits a high level of tension. (Rundle, T. 286, 331, 381; King, T. 688-689, 705, 781; Fogel, T. 1259-1261, 1263-1264, 1307-1308; Díaz-Royo, T. 1687-1688). Subsequent events to the completion of the hearing proved Dr. Hastings wrong. The first page of the "San Juan Star", on June 28, 1980, carried the following banner headline: "Three Inmates Killed. One Injured in Bayamón Prison Brawl".
[26] The Court's intervention is further sustainable by the inaction of the Governor's Special Commission of Inquiry (Plaintiffs' Exhibit 110). This commission was created with the specific duty to investigate the recent rash of escapes occurring in the jails of Puerto Rico. In the course of its fact-finding inspections of the various institutions one or more members of the Commission, composed by the Secretary of Justice, two former Secretaries of Justice, the Police Superintendent, and the Administrator, became aware of the conditions of confinement affecting the plaintiffs and their repercussions in light of recent federal court's requirements that

penal conditions must comply with civil rights. The report was delivered personally to the Governor by the Secretary, but the Commission, a continuing commission, never met after the report was submitted. (T. pp. 1935 thru 1980).
[27] The defendants' experts position on direct examination was that all of these ills existed, but time should be granted for reorganization. However, he admitted on cross-examination that emergency conditions were everywhere and his own recommendations were that drastic measures be implemented immediately.
[28] Prior to the decision of the Supreme Court in Estelle v. Gamble, supra, courts had determined that prison officials and the medical officers employed or contracted by them, had wide discretion in treating prisoners and only a clear allegation and proof of abuse of discretion would elevate the claim to constitutional proportions. However, there were cases prior to Estelle v. Gamble, which held that failure or refusal to provide medical care, or treatment so cursory to be no treatment at all, are compatible with the "deliberate indifference to serious medical needs" test of Estelle v. Gamble. The evidence in this case supports the conclusion that the practice is unconstitutional. See Tolbert v. Eyman, 434 F.2d 625, 626 (9 Cir., 1970) (warden refused authorized medicine); Page v. Sharpe, 487 F.2d 567, 569 (1 Cir., 1973) (conduct in the giving or failing to supply treatment to prisoners which shocks the conscience is actionable under 1983); Dewell v. Lawson, 489 F.2d 877 (10 Cir., 1974) (failure to procure urgently needed attention may amount to cruel and unusual punishment); Thomas v. Pate, 493 F.2d 151 (7 Cir., 1974), cert. den., sub nom. Thomas v. Cannon, 419 U.S. 879, 95 S.Ct. 143, 42 L.Ed.2d 119 (1974) (medical care so clearly inadequate as to amount to refusal); Newman v. State of Alabama, 503 F.2d 1320, 1331 (5 Cir., 1974), cert. den. 421 U.S. 948, 95 S.Ct. 1680, 44 L.Ed.2d 102 (1975) (lack of available personnel; illconceived emergency and referral procedures, shortages in drug supplies, disorganized lines of therapeutic responsibility, glaring unhygienic conditions) (callous indifference, n. 14, 1330).
[29] Young adults are not juveniles, but Judge Pettine's observation is subscribed by this Court. He said in 346 F.Supp., at 1367:
"If a boy were confined indoors by his parents, given no education or exercise and allowed no visitors, and his medical needs were ignored, it is likely that the state would intervene and remove the child for his own protection. See R.I.G.L. 14-34. Certainly, then, the State acting in its parens patriae capacity, cannot treat the boy in the same manner and justify having deprived him of his liberty. Children are not chattels."
[30] The plaintiffs' experts, although mentioning various standards, explicitly negated that their opinions were based upon the standards as some sort of talisman for space requirements. Dr. Hastings was likewise wary of putting stress upon the standards. The Administrator of Correction did state that she did refer to some standards and although she never applied for accreditation with the American Correctional Association, she is aware of their standards and plans to attend the ACA convention.
[31] The Court is aware, through testimony presented during the course of the hearings, that in many instances the superintendent of the institution sends identified psychotics or severe mentally ill inmates to the Forensic Ward of the Psychiatric Hospital of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, only to have them returned to the institution on even date. This revertion occurs because there may not be sufficient beds at the Hospital to accept these patients. That does not constitute an excuse. There are other facilities, including private facilities, in the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico where these seriously mentally ill can be treated.
[32] The Court has taken judicial notice of the fact that the Legislature of Puerto Rico has passed a revised penal code which adopts obligatory sentencing and modified determinate sentencing. Without passing judgment on the legislation, experience teaches us that obligatory sentencing radically increases prison populations and determinate sentencing inevitably leads to prisoners remaining in jail for longer periods of time. No appropriations have been made for the facilities that will be needed to house the large influx of prisoners in the immediate future.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 303 F.3d 1 (2002)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v.
John RULLAN, Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Health, etc., Defendant, Appellant.
No. 01-2201.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Heard May 9, 2002. Decided July 15, 2002.
2 *2 Carlos Del Valle, with whom Anabelle Rodriguez, Attorney General, Eileen Landrón Guardiola, and Eduardo A. Vera Ramirez were on brief, for appellant.
Alejandra Bird Lopez, with whom Carlos V. García Gutiérrez, Manuel Rodríguez Banchs, Rafael E. Rodrígues Rivera, and Civil Action and Education Corporation were on brief, for appellees.
Before BOUDIN, Chief Judge, BOWNES, Senior Circuit Judge, and SELYA, Circuit Judge.
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
This interlocutory appeal requires us to revisit a marathon class-action suit brought to remedy unconstitutional conditions of confinement in the Puerto Rico prison system. On this occasion, the Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Health (the Secretary) alleges that the district court's assignment of certain duties to the so-called chief health care coordinator (the CHCC) constitutes an unwarranted modification of a prior injunction and, in the bargain, violates the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA), Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996) (codified as amended in scattered sections of 18 U.S.C., 28 U.S.C., & 42 U.S.C.). The plaintiff class (composed of prison inmates) responds that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider the appeal on an interlocutory basis, and that, in all events, the challenged order is a proper exercise of the district court's authority. We agree with the first of the plaintiffs' assertions: the challenged order merely clarifies the court's prior decrees and imposes no serious consequences on the Secretary. Moreover, the order, in the last analysis, is a procedural measure that constitutes an exercise of the district court's housekeeping powers. For these reasons, immediate appellate 3 review is not available *3 to the Secretary as of right. Consequently, we dismiss the appeal without addressing the remaining issues briefed and argued by the parties.
I. BACKGROUND
Although the lore of this case is Byzantine, we confine our introductory remarks to those events that are directly pertinent to this appeal. We refer readers who hunger for more exegetic detail to the district court's myriad opinions. E.g., Morales Feliciano v. Roselló González, 13 F.Supp.2d 151 (D.P.R.1998) (Morales II); Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1979) (Morales I).
In early 1979, representatives of the plaintiff class commenced this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. They named several public officials as defendants, including, pertinently, the Secretary. The suit alleged dire shortcomings in virtually every aspect of prisoner confinement. The district court found that the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on some of their claims and issued a preliminary injunction ordering the defendants to address the most pressing of the identified concerns. See Morales I, 497 F.Supp. at 38-41. The court gave very high priority to inadequate medical and mental health care. See id. at 37-38.
Over time, the district court grew frustrated with the defendants' desultory responses to the preliminary injunction. To expedite compliance, the court appointed a monitor in March of 1986. The court charged the monitor with studying the relevant elements of the corrections program and recommending remedial action. With the monitor

in place, the court became actively involved in certain aspects of the management of the prison system. Not surprisingly, the court found inertia to be a persistent problem and, to overcome it, issued temporary restraining orders and contempt citations against the defendants when and as required. The court also began to impose fines for the defendants' most egregious failures to comply with its decrees (particularly those failures relating to overcrowding). Those fines escalated as the foot-dragging continued and the court's level of exasperation mounted. To date, the court has levied aggregate fines totaling nearly $135,000,000.
In October of 1990, the court ordered the implementation of medical and mental health care plans (the Plans) recommended by the monitor. By their terms, the Plans contemplated that overall responsibility for inmate health care would pass from the Administration of Corrections to the Department of Health. The Plans also required the Secretary to employ, for at least three years, a designated official 0907 the CHCC 0907 who would be responsible for easing the transition and coordinating compliance with the Plans.[1] In April of 1993, the Secretary nominated Dr. Aida Guzmán Font to assume the position. The district court approved financial support (from the fine fund) for her endeavors. When her term expired three years later, the parties jointly requested that the court approve her reappointment. The court obliged.
In January of 1996, the district court entered what it termed a "partial final judgment." In this decree, the court settled several disputed issues and urged the parties to focus their energies on "consensus-based compliance efforts, and the resolution of yet unresolved areas of the case." In the same document, the court enumerated 4 certain prior orders that it now considered *4 final (including the order approving the Plans and the orders containing the job description for the CHCC position).
The passage of time revealed that the remedial framework was not functioning smoothly. In April of 1997, a courtappointed expert found that the extant correctional health program was a bureaucratic morass incapable of meeting constitutional standards. To rectify this situation, the expert suggested the appointment of a receiver for the ailing program. The parties closed ranks to oppose this recommendation, proposing instead the creation of a private non-profit corporation (the Corporation), which would eventually assume total responsibility for providing medical and mental health services to the inmate population.
On September 26, 1997, the parties filed a stipulation designed to flesh out this joint proposal. Under its terms, the Corporation would provide health care services, consistent with the Plans, to all persons held in institutions operated by the Administration of Corrections. The stipulation promised "full coordination among all parties concerned" and required the defendants (including the Secretary) to take a series of preparatory steps to lay the groundwork for an effective transition from the existing correctional health program to the new model. The stipulation also memorialized the parties' agreement to engage in further discussions "concerning the role and authority of the CHCC with respect to monitoring the Corporation." Finally, the process of privatization 0907 that is, the transition from the existing remedial framework to the stipulated alternative 0907 was made subject to the district court's supervision. The court would be kept informed by, inter alia, the submission of regular progress reports from the CHCC.
In an ensuing opinion, the district court elaborated on the constitutional deficiencies of the existing health care programs, but declined to rule on the receivership recommendation. Morales II, 13 F.Supp.2d at 213. Instead, the court issued a series of orders designed to "build on the remedial structure ... already in place." Id. In so doing, the court reaffirmed its earlier support for the Plans and expressed a willingness to listen should the parties or the CHCC "request modifications of the [Plans] to keep abreast of health care developments or to enhance administrative and fiscal efficiency." Id. at 158.
The court also acknowledged the recommendation for the creation of a private non-profit corporation as a vehicle for the delivery of inmate health care services. See id. at 203 (citing the testimony of an expert in correctional health care to the effect that "[t]he objective of an adequate budget process and a sense of relative permanency can be accomplished through a private not-for-profit health care corporation whose primary mission is correctional health care"). But the court expressed skepticism about the parties' abilities to establish such an entity and ordered class counsel to report within ten days on the progress made in organizing the Corporation. Id. at 214. Within the allotted period, class counsel outlined the steps that were being taken to create the Corporation.

Although Morales II provides, at best, a tentative endorsement of the parties' suggested remedy, the court's subsequent statements and actions indicate full support for the nascent Corporation. That support has been 5 unwavering: despite slower-than-expected progress on the path to privatization, the court has regularly *5 reviewed and approved annual budgets for the Corporation and has authorized the disbursement of substantial monies from the fine fund to cover the Corporation's operating expenses. To date, these disbursements total around $20,000,000.
On March 31, 2000, Dr. Guzmán resigned. The district court believed that recruiting a new CHCC would be inopportune given the Corporation's "advanced stage of development" and the court's expectation that the Corporation would take over the delivery of correctional health care services within the next eighteen months. Still, the vacancy left a void. To bridge the gap temporarily, the court entered an order transferring some of the CHCC's duties to the executive director of the correctional health program (Dr. Ernesto Torres Arroyo).
A new administration came to power in Puerto Rico following the November 2000 general elections. The following February, the Secretary 0907 an appointee of the newly-elected governor 0907 sought to terminate Dr. Torres' employment as executive director of the correctional health program. In response to the plaintiffs' objection, the district court restrained the Secretary from cashiering Dr. Torres until such time as the court chose to relieve him of the duties assigned to him after Dr. Guzmán's resignation.
The Secretary did not appeal from this order, but, rather, notified the court that he was reappointing Dr. Guzmán to the vacant CHCC position. In the same motion, he asked the court to approve the appointment. The court ordered the parties to confer and submit a joint proposal designed to harmonize the CHCC's job description with the court's prior orders. The parties were unable to reach agreement. The principal bone of contention centered on the extent to which the Secretary (and, to some degree, the CHCC) would be in control of decisions regarding the privatization process.
The district court resolved the matter by issuing the order underlying the instant appeal. That ukase, entered on May 23, 2001, noted that the court had "ordered, as a solution to the myriad of problems affecting delivery of mental and medical health services to the plaintiff class in this case, the creation and organization of a private, not-for-profit corporation, to replace the present Correctional Health Program." This made it "imperative that the [CHCC] cooperate[] fully with the [Corporation] during the transition period." To achieve this goal, the court directed the CHCC to (1) provide the Corporation with information reasonably necessary for the performance of its obligations; (2) ensure attendance of correctional health program workers at training seminars organized by the Corporation; (3) appoint coordinators to assist in the development of the training seminars, the reorganization of work areas, and the installation of electronic and telephonic equipment in the medical areas of correctional institutions; (4) guard against the improper use of installed equipment; (5) require the presence of Corporation personnel during consultations with higher officials anent matters related to the provision of correctional health services; (6) inform the Corporation's chief executive officer (CEO) of the times and locations of certain meetings; and (7) attend relevant meetings called by the Corporation's board or its CEO.
The Secretary chafed at this directive and asked the district court to reconsider it. He argued, inter alia, that the order was superfluous because the CHCC, of her own volition, was cooperating fully with the Corporation. The plaintiff class opposed reconsideration, claiming that there was ample reason to believe that the Secretary and 6 the CHCC were refusing to *6 cede control over the provision of inmate health services while simultaneously conspiring to appropriate the Corporation's resources. When the district court denied reconsideration, the Secretary appealed.
On appeal, the Secretary asseverates that the assignment of new duties to the CHCC contravenes the district court's January 1996 partial judgment, which purported to make final several earlier orders (including the orders that collectively contained the CHCC's job description). Building on that foundation, the Secretary posits that the district court lacked jurisdiction to modify the January 1996 judgment and, alternatively, that the May 23 order fails to comport with the requirements of the PLRA. The plaintiffs counter that this interlocutory appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; and that, in all events, the May 23 order is unimpugnable.

II. APPELLATE JURISDICTION
It is black-letter law that "[f]ederal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, and thus must take pains to act only within the margins of that jurisdiction." Cumberland Farms, Inc. v. Me. Tax Assessor, 116 F.3d 943, 945 (1st Cir.1997). Hence, the preferred 0907 and often the obligatory 0907 practice is that a court, when confronted with a colorable challenge to its subject-matter jurisdiction, should resolve that question before weighing the merits of a pending action. See Berner v. Delahanty, 129 F.3d 20, 23 (1st Cir.1997); see also Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment, 523 U.S. 83, 94, 118 S.Ct. 1003, 140 L.Ed.2d 210 (1998). This principle holds true when an appellate court's right to exercise appellate jurisdiction is called into question. In re Cusumano, 162 F.3d 708, 712 (1st Cir.1998); Director, OWCP v. Bath Iron Works Corp., 853 F.2d 11, 12-13 (1st Cir.1988). Thus, we turn first to the question of our own jurisdiction. We start this inquiry by elucidating the general tenets that govern the existence of appellate jurisdiction and then proceed to apply those tenets to the case at hand.
A. The Legal Landscape.
There is a well-established legislative policy disfavoring inchmeal appellate review. See Anderson v. City of Boston, 244 F.3d 236, 238 (1st Cir.2001). This policy makes very good sense. "Multiple appeals in a single litigation are necessarily disruptive and, if freely allowed, subject to abuse." Sierra Club v. Marsh, 907 F.2d 210, 214 (1st Cir.1990). Thus, a federal court of appeals, as a general rule, will review decisions made by a district court only after that court enters a final judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
This rule, like virtually every general rule, admits of certain exceptions. One exception to the rule against interlocutory appeals is embedded in 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1). That statute authorizes immediate review of district court orders "granting, continuing, modifying, refusing or dissolving injunctions, or refusing to dissolve or modify injunctions." Id. This exception must be strictly construed. Sierra Club, 907 F.2d at 214. Strict construction prevents the statute from being used as a means of evading the final judgment rule.
To determine whether a particular trial court order is appealable under section 1292(a)(1), a reviewing court must look to the practical effect of the order rather than its verbiage. See Carson v. American Brands, Inc., 450 U.S. 79, 84, 101 S.Ct. 993, 67 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981). The Carson Court also made plain that a party seeking the benefit of section 1292(a)(1) must establish that the contested order imposes "serious, perhaps irreparable, 7 consequence[s]" *7 and that it may be challenged effectively only by immediate appeal. Id.
Another line of cases has relevance here. Although orders that modify injunctions may be appealable under section 1292(a)(1), orders that merely clarify previously entered injunctions are not. See, e.g., Birmingham Fire Fighters Ass'n 117 v. Jefferson County, 280 F.3d 1289, 1292-93 (11th Cir.2002); United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Asbestospray, Inc., 182 F.3d 201, 207 (3rd Cir.1999); Mikel v. Gourley, 951 F.2d 166, 168 (8th Cir.1991). To ascertain whether an order modifies an injunction, we must determine whether the underlying decree is of an injunctive character, and if so, whether the ruling complained of can be said to have altered the underlying decree in a jurisdictionally significant way. Sierra Club, 907 F.2d at 212. A change is jurisdictionally significant if it substantially readjusts the legal relations of the parties, see Cunningham v. David Special Commitment Ctr., 158 F.3d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir.1998), and does not relate simply to the conduct or progress of litigation, see Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp., 485 U.S. 271, 279, 108 S.Ct. 1133, 99 L.Ed.2d 296 (1988). Doubts as to the applicability of section 1292(a)(1) are to be resolved against immediate appealability.
B. The Case at Hand.
Here, the Secretary appeals from the district court's order of May 23, 2001, claiming that it modifies a previously issued injunction. He maintains that the underlying injunctive decree 0907 the decree modified by the order appealed from 0907 is the January 1996 partial final judgment. This designation strikes us as arbitrary. The district court created the CHCC position in an order dated October 22, 1990; broadened its purview somewhat by order dated December 18, 1992; and continued the office in effect without any appreciable change in the 1996 partial final

judgment. By the same token, the court issued several orders affecting the CHCC position in the period between January of 1996 and May of 2001.[2] Last 0907 but far from least 0907 the district court did not refer at all to the 1996 partial final judgment in crafting the order of May 23, 2001. Given this history, the Secretary's designation of the 1996 partial final judgment as the underlying injunction seems odd. The most that can be said is that the combination of orders composing the status quo as of May 23, 2001 amounted to an injunction.

Leaving to one side this obvious weakness in the Secretary's case, the question remains whether the May 23 order represented a jurisdictionally significant change in the status quo. See Sierra Club, 907 F.2d at 212-13. Answering this question requires us to focus on the practical effect of the order. See id. at 213.

As a practical matter, the May 23 order did not break new ground. The stipulation entered into by and between the parties on September 26, 1997 heralded the dawning of a new era, paving the way for a phase-out of the preexisting correctional health program and the creation of the Corporation as a new and different way to provide health services to inmates. That stipulation itself imposed obligations on the CHCC to report on the progress, and 8 otherwise monitor the activities, of the new Corporation. While these changes constituted a dramatic modification *8 of the status quo ante, the Secretary certainly cannot complain about them; they were introduced with the consent and active cooperation of his predecessor in office and, thus, bind the Secretary now. See Cornelius v. Hogan, 663 F.2d 330, 334-35 (1st Cir.1981) (finding, in an official-capacity suit, that a successor in office was bound by his predecessor's consent decree); see also Fed.R.Civ.P. 25(d)(1). A party's stipulations are binding on that party and may not be contradicted by him at trial or on appeal. Keller v. United States, 58 F.3d 1194, 1199 n. 8 (7th Cir.1995). It follows from these two propositions that a government official, sued in his representative capacity, cannot freely repudiate stipulations entered into by his predecessor in office during an earlier stage of the same litigation.

The Secretary tries to wiggle off this hook by arguing that we should disregard the stipulation because it was not explicitly entered by the district court. This argument borders on the jejune. The parties docketed the stipulation and, although the district court did not instantly embrace it, the court's subsequent actions 0907 particularly the entry of orders designed to facilitate the establishment of the new remedial framework and the release of funds to finance those activities 0907 made manifest the court's adoption of the concept. In all events, the court certainly believed that it had approved the stipulation and its serial orders put the Secretary on clear notice of its belief. See, e.g., Order of July 2, 1998 (reminding the parties that "[c]orrectional health services w[ould] soon begin to undergo the transition to a private non-profit corporation"); Order of April 19, 2000 (stating that the court previously had "accepted and ordered the implementation of the parties' stipulations and proposals to create a not-for-profit Correctional Health Services Corporation"). If the Secretary wished to hold the district court to a particular punctilio in the entry of the stipulation, the Secretary had an obligation to assert that position in a timely manner. See Putnam Resources v. Pateman, 958 F.2d 448, 456-57 (1st Cir.1992) (explaining that an aggrieved party must act expeditiously to cure perceived error); see generally United States v. Taylor, 54 F.3d 967, 972 (1st Cir.1995) (stating that "a litigant who deems himself aggrieved" by a ruling of the trial judge "ordinarily must object then and there, or forfeit any right to complain at a latter time"). His failure to do so constitutes a waiver.

Against this backdrop, it is surpassingly difficult to see how the May 23 order worked a jurisdictionally significant change in the status quo. In some respects, this case is reminiscent of Gautreaux v. Chicago Housing Authority, 178 F.3d 951 (7th Cir.1999). There, the Seventh Circuit held that an order directing a housing authority to involve a receiver in any settlement negotiations with tenants of a particular housing project was merely a reiteration of an earlier receivership decree that required "full cooperation" with the receiver. Id. at 953. On that basis, the court deemed the order unappealable under section 1292(a)(1). Id. at 958.

This case is similarly configured. The stipulation obligated the parties, in effect, to cooperate fully in the

privatization process. The assignment of specific duties to the CHCC 0907 the part of the May 23 order that rankles

the Secretary 0907 is simply another way of expressing what is reasonably to be expected from the stipulated

promise of full cooperation. In short, the May 23 order is a logical corollary to the Secretary's stipulated

9

commitment to assist in the privatization of the delivery of correctional *9 health services.[3]

The particulars of the May 23 order do not alter this analysis. The specific dictates contained in that order 0907 for instance, those requiring consultation with Corporation personnel and support of training programs 0907 do no more

than identify particular areas in which cooperation is required. Thus, the enumerated duties, taken as a whole, do not modify the status quo in any meaningful way. Confirming this conclusion is the fact that the Secretary initially objected to the May 23 order on the ground that it added nothing new to what the CHCC already was doing. His belated attempt to press the opposite view in this venue is untenable. Cf. Lydon v. Boston Sand & Gravel Co., 175 F.3d 6, 12 (1st Cir.1999) (warning that "if parties feel free to select contradictory positions before different tribunals to suit their ends, the integrity and efficacy of the courts will suffer") (quoting Patriot Cinemas, Inc. v. Gen. Cinema Corp., 834 F.2d 208, 214 (1st Cir.1987)).
For much the same reasons, we do not accept the Secretary's plaint that the May 23 order has serious consequences. The order is disruptive, he tells us, because it undermines his authority to control the actions of a subordinate and, concomitantly, forces that subordinate 0907 the CHCC 0907 to preside over the dismantling of the correctional health program. This tale is unconvincing 0907 and mischaracterizes the record to boot.
In the first place, it was the Secretary 0907 not the district court 0907 who insisted on filling the CHCC position. He nominated Dr. Guzmán for the post knowing full well that a court-ordered privatization of health care services was in full swing. He cannot seriously contend that his unilateral decision to fill this vacancy somehow wipes the slate clean, allowing him to throw a monkey wrench into the privatization process and scuttle the reforms to which his predecessor had stipulated.
In the second place, the consequences that the Secretary cites are the natural sequelae of the earlier agreement to transfer correctional health services to the Corporation. Those woes are not fairly attributable to the May 23 order. By first consenting to the privatization plan and then seeking to fill the CHCC position while the transition to privatization was underway, the Secretary became the author of his own misfortune.
If more were needed on this point 0907 and we doubt that it is 0907 the Secretary's argument misstates the nature of the CHCC position. That position has never been exclusively under the Secretary's hegemony. From the very beginning, the CHCC has been subject to dual oversight, reporting both to the Secretary and the district court.[4] This dual reporting relationship dovetails with the remedial framework that the court erected when it created the CHCC position to address constitutional shortcomings in inmate health services. Given the hybrid nature of the position, fine-tuning the CHCC's role to accommodate the stipulated changeover to privatization does little to alter 10 the legal relations *10 of the parties as they existed on May 23, 2001. The alteration, as we have said, dates back to the execution of the stipulation.
There is yet another basis for our conclusion that the May 23 order does not significantly modify the status quo. The parties, through the stipulation, explicitly agreed that "[t]he privatization process must be subject to Court supervision." This language gave the court substantial latitude in procedural matters relating to how best to achieve privatization. Given that fostering compliance with the district court's remedial framework is the CHCC's raison être, the order that the Secretary challenges here can be viewed as procedural in nature (akin, say, to the appointment of a monitor).
The Ninth Circuit dealt with an analogous procedural order in Thompson v. Enomoto, 815 F.2d 1323 (9th Cir.1987), a prisoner class action. There, the court had to decide whether the appointment of a special master to supervise compliance with a consent decree constituted a modification of the decree. Emphasizing the interim nature of the position, the court found no "serious or irreparable harm" stemming from the appointment. Id. at 1327. We think that here, as in Thompson, the order appealed from was within the lower court's reserved power to establish procedures for compliance with the court's earlier decrees.[5]Id. So viewed, the May 23 order was simply "a step in controlling the litigation before the court," Baltimore Contractors, Inc. v. Bodinger, 348 U.S. 176, 185, 75 S.Ct. 249, 99 L.Ed. 233 (1955). Orders of that stripe are not immediately appealable. See, e.g., Van Orman v. Am. Ins. Co., 680 F.2d 301, 314 (3d Cir.1982) (dismissing interlocutory appeal when the order appealed from was merely a "judicial housekeeping measure designed to assist the court in framing ultimate relief in the case").

III. CONCLUSION
To recapitulate, the May 23 order is not a modification of a previous injunction, but, rather, a clarification of the CHCC's role in light of other developments in the case. At any rate, the order does not have serious or irreparable consequences for the Secretary because any infringement on his autonomy is a function of previously ordered relief. Finally, the nature of the obligations imposed on the CHCC places the May 23 order in the category of procedural orders that are not immediately appealable.
We need go no further. For the reasons discussed above, we dismiss the appeal for want of appellate jurisdiction.
Appeal dismissed.
[1] The designated official initially was called the "chief medical coordinator." The title was changed in December of 1992.
[2] These include an order of May 16, 1997 (directing the CHCC to take contractual steps to maintain continuity of health services) and an order of April 19, 2000 (declining to name a new CHCC because the position would become obsolete within "a brief period of time").
[3] This conclusion is fortified by the fact that the CHCC position was created for the express purpose of implementing the Plans. The parties (through the stipulation) and the district court have now determined that privatization is the best route to achieve that goal. From that standpoint, a failure on the part of the CHCC to assist in executing the privatization process would violate her longstanding duty to implement the Plans.
[4] The process by which the Secretary aspired to reappoint Dr. Guzmán as the CHCC illustrates this dichotomy. Although the Secretary selected her for the position, he submitted the nomination to the district court for the court's approval.
[5] As was true of the court-appointed special master in Thompson, the CHCC position was never meant to exist in perpetuity. To the contrary, the Plans contemplate that the CHCC will serve a three-year term, and the court has made it abundantly clear that the position will become obsolete once the transition to privatization has been completed. Thus, the May 23 order is temporary in the sense that it applies only to the transition period.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 13 F.Supp.2d 151 (1998)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Pedro ROSSELLÓ GONZÁLEZ, et al., Defendants.
No. CIV. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
May 18, 1998.
1523 *152 *153 Carlos García Gutiérrez, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs.
Luis F. Del Valle Emmanuelli, Federal Litigation Division, Department of Justice, San Juan, PR, for Defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, District Judge.
1. On March 10, 1997, the court entered an order appointing Vincent M. Nathan, Esq., the former Court Monitor, as an expert witness pursuant to Rule 706, Fed. R. Ev., to prepare a report that would update the record in this case and document the state of compliance with the court's orders. The court directed Mr. Nathan to submit a 154 report on medical and mental health care. Mr. *154 Nathan's report concluded that "there is virtually no likelihood that the defendants, left to their own devices, will ever achieve compliance with the court's orders in the areas of medical and mental health care or will ever provide services in these areas that comport with even the most basic constitutional requirements." Report on Medical and Mental Health Care at 39 (filed April 14, 1997, admitted in evidence over objection as CT Exhibit 13). Accordingly, Mr. Nathan recommended that the court appoint "a receiver with ample authority to manage the Correctional Health Program free of all constraints of Commonwealth law." Id. at 40. That report and recommendation set the stage for the instant proceedings.
2. The Court received motions from both the plaintiffs and the defendants opposing the court's expert witness's recommendation of a receiver. Motion to Submit Plaintiffs' Specific Alternative to the Court's Expert Witness' Recommendation that a Receiver Be Appointed to Resolve the Correctional Health Program Crisis (Dkt.6559, May 19, 1997); Supplemental Motion on Plaintiffs' Proposed Alternative to a Receivership for the Correctional Health Program (Dkt. 6590, June 26, 1997); Final Supplement to Plaintiffs' Specific Alternative to the Court's Expert Witness' Recommendation that a Receiver Be Appointed to solve the Correctional Health Program Crisis (Plaintiffs' Alternative) (Dkt.6615, August 8, 1997); Defendants' Motion Requesting Additional Time to Address Plaintiffs' Alternative Recommendation to the Expert Witness' Report on the Correctional Health Program (Dkt.6565, May 30, 1997); Defendants' Supplement to Their Correctional Health Program Crisis Proposal (Dkt.6627, August 18, 1997). The Court scheduled a hearing to commence August 18, 1997, to address the recommendation and the current state of medical and mental health care in the prison system.[1] The Correctional Health Program is referred to as the Program or the CHP. After the hearing was concluded, the parties submitted a Plaintiff Class' and Defendants' Joint Proposal Concerning Correctional Health Program (September 26, 1997).
3. At the hearing, 13 witnesses testified. In general, the witnesses were distinguished professionals knowledgeable about the Puerto Rico prison system, and highly credible, with such exceptions as set out below. 1556 [2] In *155 *156 addition to the testimony, close to seven hundred documentary exhibits were submitted by plaintiffs and stipulated by defendants including considerable statistical data concerning the operation of the Correctional Health Program. Additional documentary evidence was submitted on behalf of the Court's Expert Witness, without objection by the parties. Some documents were admitted over objection.

I. FINDINGS OF FACT
4. The defendants in this litigation have been subject to court orders to improve the delivery of health care services to inmates dating back to the court's preliminary injunction of 1980. Feliciano v. Barcelo, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1980). The parties eventually stipulated to the Medical Care and Mental Health plans (together referred to below as the "Plans"). In 1990, the court approved the court monitor's Amended 62nd Report, the Report Recommending Adoption of Revised Medical and Mental Health Plans, which included the Plans. The court's order of approval also ordered defendants to implement the Plans to remedy almost a decade of non-compliance with the court's orders to provide constitutionally required health care. As a result, the Administrator of Correction and the Secretary of Health agreed to transfer the responsibility for correctional health services to the Department of Health. In 1986, after further hearings, the court found inter alia that the preliminary injunction had not been complied with. The court appointed Vincent M. Nathan, Esquire, as the Court Monitor, to monitor compliance with its orders, including those addressing medical and mental health care. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F.Supp. 591 (D.P.R.1986).
5. In 1980, health care services within Puerto Rico's prisons were virtually nonexistent. There was one psychiatrist for the entire system, which had custody at that time of approximately 3,000 inmates. Mentally ill patients at Bayamón 308 were housed in what was known as the "máxima de locos" (maximum for crazies), where they received virtually no attention and the distribution of medication was carried out by other inmates. There were three, perhaps four physicians to provide medical services to the entire AOC inmate population. There were no licensed pharmacists in the system.
6. In 1988, the Administration of Correction entered into an agreement with the Department of Health by which correctional health services were to be rendered by Department of Health personnel. By 1993, the program under which such services were provided was just beginning to develop an identity of its own and was designated the Correctional Health Program. At the same time, the services at the institutional level were severely disorganized and understaffed and still relied upon unlicenced personnel. The services were not integrated and each "track" of services 0907 e.g., nursing, mental health, etc. 0907 responded to its own directors at the central office level. There was only one licensed pharmacist for all of the island's penal institutions. Medical records were disorganized and there was not even a rudimentary infectious disease control program. Quality improvement was very fragmented. Health education was done by a psychologist at the central level and was not being extended to the institutions. The administrative aspects of the program were being performed by a single secretary.
7. A 1990 report by the Court Monitor concluded, based on the assessments of two distinguished expert 157 consultants, that "[a] number of conditions found and prohibited by the Court in 1980 persist throughout the *157
correctional system, and the current medical and mental health delivery systems throughout the AOC endanger the lives and health of inmates and staff alike." 100th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Delivery of Medical and Mental Health Care (Dkt.2050, at 3, filed February 2, 1990, confirmed by order of June 14, 1990, Dkt. 2268). This conclusion, and the experts' findings, were not contested by the defendants and, indeed, came as no surprise. When the Court Monitor first introduced the consultants to the then Administrator of Corrections, Dra. Mercedes Otero de Ramos, she
made clear her preference that the consultants not tell her what she already knew at the time 0907 that systems for delivery of medical and mental health care to prisoners throughout Puerto Rico were in near total disarray. Rather, she requested that the consultants provide her with a plan containing proposed solutions to the problems that had been brought to her attention through prior evaluations and her own observations of the correctional system.

Amended 62nd Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report Recommending Adoption of the Revised Medical Plan and Mental Health Plan at 3 (filed December 13, 1989).
8. Both of the Court Monitor's consultants conferred extensively with representatives of the Administration of Correction and the Department of Health in the course of their work and submitted initial proposed plans for providing adequate medical and mental health care. These became the subject of extensive and cooperative discussion and revision among the parties and the Court Monitor that led to the Medical Care Plan and the Mental Health Plan ("the Plans") that were recommended to the court in the Amended 62nd Report. Neither party objected to any part of the Plans. On January 2, 1990, the court tentatively approved the Plans and directed the defendants to commence implementing them. Final approval was given by order dated October 23, 1990 (Dkt.2465), after the court completed the notice and review procedure required by Rule 23(e), Fed.R.Civ.P., which the court followed out of an abundance of caution.
9. Since their entry as orders, these Plans have been supplemented and modified by several further orders addressing certain medical and mental health care issues. See Order Approving Lambert King's Recommendations, December 18, 1992 (Dkt.4156); Order Confirming 213th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report Conveying Medical Consultant's Findings of Site Visits Conducted April 25-28, 1992 and Appendix B of the Report, December 29, 1992 (Dkt.4166); Order amending § 58 of the Medical Care Plan, July 9, 1993 (Dkt.4537). At the hearing, the Correctional Health Care Coordinator praised the plans, and she was not alone in doing so.
Goals of the Plans
10. The principal goals of the Correctional Health Program, are fourfold: (1) integration of health services throughout the large and complex institutional system under the jurisdiction of the Administration of Correction; (2) to provide services commensurate with contemporary standards of professional practice of medicine, with emphasis on preventive services to the entire inmate population; (3) to guarantee accessibility for all inmates to the full range of health services available, including hospitalization, emergency services, and subspecialty facilities and clinics; and (4) to provide health education to the inmate population and correctional staff to improve the level of understanding of sound health and prevention of disease. The services addressed by the Plans include, in addition to direct medical services, all the supporting services necessary to operate an integrated health care system, including, among others, health education, quality improvement, diets, medical records, and administrative support. These goals and services reflect contemporary standards for the provision of adequate health services generally, whether within the free community or within a correctional setting. The general community standards of providing integrated health care services are embodied as well in the standards promulgated by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (the "Joint Commission"). The Health Care Executive Committee had thus proposed the adoption of the standards of the Joint Commission 158 as the benchmark *158 by which to evaluate correctional health services in Puerto Rico.
11. The court specifically finds that the four goals set out in the Plans are essential to any remedy for the elimination of the long-standing and present violation of plaintiffs' federal constitutional rights. Of special importance is the integration of health care services throughout all of the institutions operated, directly or under contract, by the Administration of Correction. While the parties, or the Chief Health Care Coordinator, may from time to time request modifications of the Plans to keep abreast of health care developments or to enhance administrative and fiscal efficiency, any changes must be shown to further these goals.

Historic Noncompliance with the Plans
12. Past and present defendants have not complied with the Plans, as documented in a series of motions and reports by the Court Monitor, as a result of which the court took a series of actions intended to facilitate compliance.
13. In the 202nd Report of the Court Monitor 0907 HIV/AIDS Focused Study (filed July 28, 1992, confirmed August 18, 1992; Dkt. 3839), the monitor found extensive noncompliance with the Medical Plan's requirements with respect to HIV care and concluded that defendants' failure "places HIV-positive prisoner's lives in peril." Id. at 27, Finding 31. The court directed the defendants to implement the report's recommendations.
14. In the 213th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report Conveying Medical Consultant's Findings of Site Visits Conducted April 18-25, 1992 (filed September 21, 1992; Appendix B filed October 27, 1992; confirmed December 28, 1992; Dkt. 3966), the monitor's consultants documented noncompliance with the Plans' requirements concerning intake screening, inadequately equipped medical facilities, inadequate staffing of facilities housing chronically ill patients, failure to provide medical diets, unavailability of correctional staff to escort inmates to medical appointments inside and outside the prison, etc.
15. A memorandum of August 12, 1993, addressed to the Department of Health officials reporting the most recent findings of the audits performed at seven prisons by the monitor's medical consultants, the report was very critical of the very little progress achieved toward compliance with the Medical Plan. Office of the Court Monitor, Summary of the Morales Feliciano Litigation, January 11, 1995 (Dkt.5532), at 193-94.[3]
16. A June 8, 1993 Stipulation on the Río Piedras Complex and Other Matters at 12 (Dkt.4477) described health care at the State Penitentiary as "fragmented, disjointed, thus lacking continuity of care."
17. A similar pattern of noncompliance with the Mental Health Plan was documented in a series of reports including, the Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report Pursuant to the Court's Order of January 4, 1990 (filed March 16, 1990; confirmed June 13, 1990; Dkt. 2123) (finding acute mental health care at Annex 504 and Vega Alta grossly deficient); 151st Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Delivery of Mental Health Services at Vega Alta at 2 and § II (filed April 25, 1991; confirmed May 21, 1991; Dkt. 2822) (documenting dangerous conditions under which psychotic female inmates had been held, and defendants' failure to remedy problem); 134th Report of the 159 Court Monitor 0907 *159 Report on the Delivery of Health Care Services at Guerrero (filed December 7, 1990; confirmed February 4, 1991; Dkt. 2545) (documenting failure to operate special treatment unit in compliance with Mental Health Plan and inadequate, sometimes inappropriate and dangerous, treatment); 168th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Observations of Mentally Ill Inmates Housed in the Intensive Treatment Unit of the State Penitentiary (filed August 23, 1991; confirmed October 30, 1991; Dkt. 3139) (finding failure to screen inmates in Intensive Treatment Unit consistently with mental health plan and noting breakdowns of communication between AOC and the Department of Health ("DOH") that adversely affected provision of care); 215th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Defendants' Progress Toward Compliance with Their Mental Health Plan (filed September 23, 1992; confirmed October 19, 1992; Dkt. 3969) (reporting comprehensive audit finding little progress toward compliance with Mental Health Plan).
II. NEEDS OF THE INMATE POPULATION: HEALTH CONDITIONS
18. The inmate population in Puerto Rico has a disproportionate need for health services, which translates to a similar need for resources-including time, money, equipment, and facilities 0907 to address those health needs. Particularly there is an urgent need for careful planning based on rational budgeting, streamlined procedures, job security and reasonable compensation, adequate staffing (both health care and security personnel), transportation, quick and responsible contracting and acquisitions, and everything else that is needed to set up an organized health care system that provides services to human beings, albeit not the most fortunate human beings. The Commonwealth's Secretary of the Treasury, who testified on behalf of the equitable defendants, and particularly on behalf of the Governor, repeatedly stated "That is unacceptable" when confronted with the

obstacles placed in the way of the Correctional Health Program. No explanation was offered for the consistent policies and decisions by highly placed officials which have brought about the present debacle.
19. In general terms, a high percentage of the AOC inmate population has suffered from childhood neglect or abandonment, abuse, or drug abuse, and/or have previously been in juvenile institutions. Even though the average age of population is in the mid-thirties, there are a disproportionate number of chronic conditions.
20. The prison population in Puerto Rico suffers from a higher overall prevalence of chronic diseases than the general population. The prevalence in the prison population is 20.7 per 100 persons, while the rate in the general population is 12.75 per 100 males. The rate of mental health disorders in the prison population is approximately 30 percent, which is higher than the rate in the general population. The target population in terms of oral health in the prisons is 100 percent. The inmate population is at higher risk for infectious diseases than the general population, and a higher concentration of high-risk illnesses than the free community. The control of infectious diseases is more difficult in the inmate population, first, because inmates tend to be a higher risk population, and second, because of the close confinement of the population. Outbreaks of contagious diseases can more easily become uncontrollable. Based on an outreach performed by mental health staff in 1997, there are an estimated 674 inmates in the Puerto Rico prison system who require mental health care services but who are not receiving such services; of these, approximately 121 should be in an intermediate psychiatric care facility, 464 in ambulatory services, and 89 in the hospital. Approximately 70 percent of the total inmate population in Puerto Rico has a history of drug abuse. This population is a target for mental health services.
21. Approximately 1.4 percent of the total inmate population in Puerto Rico requires acute mental health care. "Acute" mental health care is that care provided to patients who are psychologically decompensated and can involve acute psychosis, severe depression with suicidal ideations, or drug or alcohol withdrawal. (Acute mental health care is provided in a hospital setting or infirmary for those with drug withdrawal symptoms.)
160 *160 22. Approximately 1.9 percent of the total inmate population in Puerto Rico requires intermediate mental health care. "Intermediate" mental health care is care provided within a psychosocial residential facility. It is care provided to patients with chronic mental health problems who may need constant care at different levels. Within intermediate mental health units, patients are taught daily living skills, use of medication, and how to detect the onset of acute symptoms. Patients in intermediate facilities also are provided occupational and group therapy.
23. Approximately 27.2 percent of the total inmate population in Puerto Rico requires ambulatory mental health care. Ambulatory mental health services are outpatient services provided in the same setting and integrated with regular out-patient services.
24. Currently in the AOC system, the CHP has identified 131 patients with hepatitis A, 356 patients with HIV, 279 PPD + patients, 147 patients with AIDS, 198 patients with diabetes, 6 patients with active tuberculosis, 311 patients with high blood pressure, 106 patients with epilepsy, 4 with lupus, 46 with peptic ulcer disease, 4 with leukemia, 4 with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and 1 cancer patient. There also are 922 patients with chronic conditions in the privatized institutions.
25. One of the objectives of the Plans is the creation of an integrated health care system. An integrated system for the delivery of health care is necessary because it has a multiplying effect on the delivery of services. In an integrated system, services are delivered through interdisciplinary teams. An integrated system of health care delivery represents the standard of care in the community and comports with professional standards of care. An integrated system maximizes the benefits that patients receive from the services rendered by the CHP. It is more cost effective, allows patients to receive different levels of care, and is sounder from an administrative perspective. In an integrated system, all prisoners have available to them the same medical services. The CHP cannot achieve acceptable professional standards of care if any one component of an integrated health care systems is not present. As part of an integrated system of medical care, all of the different specialties 0907 medical, mental, and dental care 0907 must work together. If an integrated system of health services is available when an inmate enters the prison system, all health needs that the inmate may have can be identified, and all such needs can be addressed.

26. An integrated health system includes a system for health education. Health education is necessary to the prevention and promotion of health. Inmates with specific medical conditions require education concerning medication, attending appointments, how to determine when medical attention is required, etc. Health education also is important to enable people within the correctional setting to lower their risk of exposure to disease within the institutions.
27. In certain cases, it is necessary to provide unitary dosages of medication to inmates. Unitary dosage of medication is the individual presentation of each dose of medication to a patient, to ensure that the patient is taking the medication properly. Several types of medications call for unitary doses. For example, the medications used for HIV + and AIDS patients, for patients with a positive tuberculin test, or active tuberculosis, for patients with mental conditions who must receive psychopharmacological medication, patients who exhibit some kind of physical condition requiring controlled medication, and for epileptic patients. Unitary doses are served by nurses at various times during the day and are taken by the patient in front of the nurse and the custodial officer that accompanies the nurse.
28. Current standards call for placing inmates going through withdrawal symptoms under medical supervision for at least seven days. Failure to provide the necessary treatment can result in dehydration. In addition, withdrawal patients suffer from restlessness and changes in personality. They can be vulnerable and subject to mistreatment or sexual abuse by the general population. Withdrawal from alcoholic intoxication can be a life threatening process.
161 29. To conduct an effective infection control program, the CHP requires protective *161 isolation and respiratory isolation facilities to control outbreaks of diseases such as tuberculosis. These facilities are also required by OSHA regulations. Isolation rooms should be checked at least every month, and air changes in the rooms should be monitored. Failure of the isolation rooms to work correctly increases the probability of an outbreak of disease among inmates and staff. Infection control nurses should inspect the isolation rooms at least monthly.
30. An integrated health care system requires the maintenance of medical records, which should accompany inmates who are transferred from one institution to another. Current professional standards also require the maintenance of valid statistics concerning the incidence and prevalence of infectious diseases.[4]
III. POLICY AS AN INSTRUMENT OF CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS
Budgeting Insufficiencies and Instability
31. Since 1993 the Correctional Health Program has never has been provided with a budget sufficient to provide adequate health care services to inmates. In addition, money has been promised to the Program by the Office of Management and Budget, but never delivered, and the Program has not been able at times, to use even available funds. The Health Services and Facilities Administration (AFASS, the Spanish acronym) has on occasions arbitrarily deducted money from the appropriation assigned for the Program, which cannot submit a budget request directly to the Puerto Rico legislature nor to the Office of Management and Budget. The CHP must, instead, submit a proposed budget request to AFASS. From there on, the Program has no control over what happens to its budget request. Nevertheless, by the time the request reaches the legislature, it has been dramatically slashed. Correctional Health Program personnel are not allowed to be involved in developing the CHP's portion of the Executive Branch's budget, beyond submitting the initial proposal to AFASS.
32. A stable budget is critical for the Program because the administration and management of resources cannot be planned unless the program administrators know how much their budget will be. The budgeting process under which the CHP operates does not provide any certainty to the program's administrators. Even after funds have been appropriated to the program, the staff is never really sure how much money will be available for the program's operations. Resolving these issues throughout the year diverts attention and efforts from the primary responsibilities of the program.[5] In spite of increasing expenses over the last four fiscal years, and increasing

budget petitions, the funds appropriated for the CHP for the 94-95, 95-96, and 96-97 fiscal years did not change significantly.
33. The Puerto Rico Correctional system is not capable of achieving compliance with the medical and mental health care plans under the present administrative arrangements. The inadequate resources allocated to the CHP result in staffing and supply problems. The present financial arrangements for the Program are not sufficient to achieve compliance with the medical care plan. At present, the process for obtaining professional staff to work in the program is insufficient to comply with the medical and mental health care plans. The physical facilities in many of the institutions are inadequate to achieve compliance with both plans.
34. In preparing a budget request for the CHP, institutional staff present their needs to the program's central office and based on these and the central office's own needs, a budget petition for the program is prepared by the central office staff. The program sends the budget petition to the executive director of AFASS, and has no further 162 participation in the budget process. The process of preparing the CHP budget petition *162 begins in September of the prior year, and the Governor's budget petition is presented to the legislature in February or March. The appropriations are made by June 30th and arrive at the program during the first or second week of July of the new fiscal year.
35. The Chief Health Care Coordinator was not involved in preparing the budget for the 1992-1993 or the 1993-1994 fiscal years, because those budgets already had been prepared by the time of her appointment. The budget appropriation for the CHP, including the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, during the 1993-1994 fiscal year was approximately $18.4 million. Late in 1993, however, the program was notified that $1 million would be subtracted from the appropriation, and later was notified that an additional $1 million would be subtracted from the appropriation. No explanation was forthcoming for either subtraction. Exhibit 613. See also Exhibits 331-334. After the CHCC sought assistance from the Secretary of State, then the Governor's Personal Representative anent this litigation, the $2 million was restored to the program, along with an additional $686,505.00. In spite of the additional $686,505.00 provided the CHP in the 1993-1994 fiscal year, the program had a budget shortfall of nearly $2 million for that year.
36. For the 1994-1995 fiscal year, the CHP submitted a budget petition of approximately $27.5 million, but was appropriated only $22.6 million for operational expenses. The program also had requested approximately $9.5 million for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, but was appropriated only $8.4 million. The total amount appropriated to the CHP, therefore, was $31 million. During the 1994-1995 fiscal year, the government withheld 4 percent of the total funding for government agencies to pay incentive bonuses to government employees. In addition, 2 percent of funds appropriated for government agencies was withheld as a contingency fund. This policy affected the CHP as well as all government agencies, but no amounts were withheld from the appropriation for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital. As a result of the 4 percent incentive pay withholding and the 2 percent withholding for contingencies, the resulting amount available for planning to the CHP, including the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, during the 1994-1995 fiscal year was $29.785 million.
37. After the Chief Health Care Coordinator requested assistance from the Secretary of State in late 1994, $2.2 million of the amount appropriated for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital was transferred to the CHP for its operations. The Secretary of Health promised to cover any further deficiencies that might occur in the program's budget for that fiscal year. In addition to the $2.2 million transfer from the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, the CHP was restored the 6 percent withheld for merit bonuses and contingencies, although the restoration of these funds did not occur until three weeks before the end of the fiscal year in which they were appropriated. The total funding available for the program in the 1994-1995 fiscal year, therefore, was $24,826,064. The Chief Health Care Coordinator managed to obtain the transfer of funds from the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital and the restoration of funds from the contingency and merit bonus funds after plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction to compel defendants to adequately fund the CHP.[6]
38. Expenditures by the CHP in fiscal year 1994-1995, however, were approximately $31 million, leaving the program with a deficit of approximately $6.3 million. It cannot be determined how the $6.3 million deficit was covered, because the responsibility for covering costs and expenditures of the program falls upon AFASS.

39. For the 1995-1996 fiscal year, the CHP submitted a budget request for approximately $64.6 million. This amount includes $15.2 million for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, $38.4 million for the CHP's operations, and $11 million for the medical surgical unit. The medical surgical unit was to be a secure unit for tertiary care for 163 inmates, to minimize reliance on outside facilities: this *163 component of the health care system also has not been developed. The amount appropriated for the CHP for the 1995-1996 fiscal year was approximately $34.2 million; which is just under 50 percent of what was requested. The $34.2 million included $2 million appropriated for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, and $32.2 million for CHP operations. Although the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital could not be opened during the 1995-1996 fiscal year, the CHP already had hired staff for the hospital based on the promises made to her that the Hospital was nearing completion.
40. At a meeting in June 1995, the Secretary of Health agreed to make available $48.3 million to the CHP. These funds would consist of the full $38 million requested for CHP operations and approximately $10 million for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital. In spite of the Secretary of Health's promises at the June 1995 meeting, only $40 million was assigned to the CHP consisting of the original $32 million appropriated, plus an additional $8.4 million. The additional $8.4 million assigned to the CHP disappeared from AFASS' information system in June 1996 because the Office of Management and Budget had decided not to make the monies available through AFASS' accounting system. Instead, the program would be allowed to spend up to $5 million and any excess would be covered by AFASS from its own budget. The CHP spent $40 million in fiscal year 1995-1996, leaving a deficit of $7.8 million. This is typical of the unstable budgeting practices which make rational, efficient and cost effective management impossible as a direct result of the defendants' policy acts and omissions.
41. For fiscal year 1996-1997, the CHP requested a budget of $75.5 million, including $50.8 million for the program's operations, $12.8 million for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, and $11.8 million for the Medical Surgical Unit. The total amount appropriated to the CHP for fiscal year 1996-1997 was $31 million for the program's operations. This amount also was supposed to include the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital. In addition to the $31 million appropriated to the CHP's operational budget, two special assignments totaling $900,000 were made to the Program. Although no funds had been specifically appropriated to the CHP for the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital for fiscal year 1996-1997, in May 1996 the Governor signed an executive order awarding $2 million for opening the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, which was accomplished in August 1996.
42. Given the anticipated shortfall in funding for the CHP in fiscal year 1996-1997, in July 1996 the Director of the Office of Management and Budget agreed to award an additional $20 million to the program. In spite of the promise by the OMB Director, the $20 million never was made available to AFASS for CHP's budget.[7] In May 1997 the Governor signed an executive order transferring $20 million from the Budgetary Fund for use by the CHP. These funds were placed within the Department of the Treasury. The Governor's executive order of May 1997 did not actually provide the CHP with an additional $20 million, but merely reinstated the $20 million that the Director of the OMB had promised the program the previous year.
43. At the time of the hearing it was still not known how much the CHP spent in fiscal year 1996-1997 (which had ended on June 30) because AFASS ceased making payments to contractors and suppliers and the program's expenses are currently are being paid for from the $20 million in the control of the Department of the Treasury. The process of determining how much money is owed by the program still hasn't been completed. Of the $20 million placed in the control of the Treasury Department, approximately $8 million were used to pay debts of the CHP for the 1996-1997 fiscal year and debts outstanding from prior fiscal years. Another $8 million was spent in the program's regular operations.
44. The Program was assigned $46.06 million for its 1997-1998 budget. The CHP anticipated that it would have a 164 budget shortfall *164 of approximately $6 million for the 1997-1998 fiscal year. Based on the anticipated
1997-1998 shortfall, the CHP prepared four analyses of its budget in an attempt to confront and deal with the contemplated shortfall.
45. As an example, one alternative proposed for dealing with the 1997-1998 budget shortfall would be to dismiss 20 regular employees. Furthermore, purchases would be reduced by 32 percent comprising of medical and surgical material; dental material; health education material; physical, occupational and recreational material; office and maintenance supplies; dental prosthesis and eyeglasses. In addition, the program would reduce by 15

percent the purchase of drugs and medicines, it would eliminate the purchase of medical and office equipment, reduce by 18 percent the general expenditures of the program and do away with the reserves of funds created to pay debts from previous years. The implementation of any one of the four alternatives to counterbalance the 1997-1998 budget shortfall would deal a severe blow to the delivery of health care services by CHP.
46. The budgetary difficulties faced by the CHP have not allowed the program to use its budget and fiscal processes as administrative and management instruments because the program has never been able to anticipate how much money it will have available. The program has no control over its budgetary and fiscal situation, much less the autonomy required to comply with the court's orders.
47. Since 1993, the services provided to inmates have increased. This increase necessarily results in higher costs to the CHP. As more inmates are seen by health care professionals, more lab tests are ordered and more illnesses and diseases are diagnosed and treated.
48. The problem of lack of funds which affects the CHP has diverted the attention of its personnel from other administrative aspects of the program. The time spent addressing the funding problems has reduced the time available to attend to personnel and internal administrative matters. The CHP's staff does not know how, when or whether budget deficits are covered since this is an internal matter within AFASS's control.
49. Because of funding shortages, the CHP can only obtain special nutritional supplements for the most seriously ill patients. One of the Chief Health Care Coordinator's concerns in initiating a triple therapy program for HIVpositive patients in the AOC system is the lack of monies for medication and personnel. The CHP could have begun to provide triple therapy in 1996 if the concerns about budget, inmate tracking, and continuity of care had been addressed. The cost per patient of triple therapy is between $8,000 and $13,000 per year. Instituting triple therapy, however, can eventually save the Commonwealth money by reducing the number of patients that are hospitalized for opportunistic infections. The shortages and uncertainty in appropriations for the CHP make it difficult to contract with outside vendors since the program has to certify to them that funds are available to cover the expenses generated by any such contract. In addition, the program could not fill thirty staff positions needed to handle the administrative responsibilities associated with the execution of such contracts.
50. Administrative Order 112, together with Administrative Order 66, were intended to provide the CHP with greater autonomy in contracting and budgeting. Exhibit 379. Order 112 was intended to allow the CHP to transfer funds between line items in its budget. Administrative Order 112, however, did not fulfill the purposes for which it was promulgated because the Correctional Health staff were not given contract numbers.[8] The CHP also could not exercise the budgetary autonomy intended by Administrative Order 112 because the program's staff did not have access to the Department of Health computers to transfer funds from one line to another. Thus, even when 165 monies were available *165 in the program's budget, the program may not be able to use them.[9]
51. The dissolution of the Anti-Addiction Services Department (DSCA, the Spanish acronym) and the creation of the Administration of Mental Health and Anti-Addiction services (ASSMCA, the Spanish acronym) created problems for the CHP because some former DSCA personnel were assigned to the CHP's mental health services program. Even so, the program was not assigned the additional financial resources to pay the salaries of those added persons or to provide anti-addiction services to inmates. Administrative Order 69, which transferred to the CHP the responsibility for providing services formerly provided by DSCA, established that all financial resources, personnel and equipment were to be transferred to the CHP. Although Administrative Order 69 required the CHP to provide mental health services for inmates with addictive disorders, the program was not assigned any budget for providing those services. In spite of the fact that both personnel and responsibility for anti-addiction services supposedly were transferred from DSCA to the CHP, the program never received the budgetary funds to correspond to the transfers. The only items actually transferred to the CHP from DSCA were some vehicles in very poor condition and some equipment.
Deficiencies in Staffing
52. The Correctional Health Program never has been able to recruit the number of health care staff required to provide adequate health care services to the AOC inmates. In particular, the number of staff personnel required

to provide mental health services has never been enough. In some intake centers, where medical personnel are supposed to cover the admissions area 24 hours per day, CHP can only provide staff during the day and evening hours.
53. The Program does not have adequate control over its personnel administration. This lack of control has led directly to deficiencies in the delivery of health care services, and, in at least one instance, caused the death of an inmate. Arbitrary and unreasonable limitations on the program's ability to recruit personnel have been imposed on the program by the Secretary of Health and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). For example, after the government privatized the Commonwealth's public health system, the Secretary of Health and the Director of the OMB instructed the CHP that it must first recruit new personnel from individuals formerly employed by the (Department of Health) DOH. It took several months for AFASS to deliver to the CHP a list of candidates who had been ceased from their employment with DOH as a result of the health reform. Even then, most of the candidates had no interest in working for the CHP.
54. Personnel in the CHP are grouped into four categories: employees who hold regular or permanent positions, transitory employees, wage earning employees 0907 also called irregular employees 0907 and contract employees. The law that created AFASS permits the recruitment of health professionals by contracts to provide medical services to the patients. Of the four categories of personnel in the DOH, the irregular and contract categories are the least attractive to prospective staff because they do not include fringe benefits.[10]
55. Employees in the irregular category were recruited by the clinical services director at each institution and, once recruited, were officially appointed by the program's central office personnel division. As to the employees to be hired under contracts, the Chief Health Care Coordinator approved the recruitment of such employees subject to availability of funds. Once the potential employee is recruited, however, the award of a contract requires the processing of a number of documents. The contract processing procedure was originally performed by AFASS. 166 Subsequently, the authority to process these contracts was transferred to the CHP although *166 such contracts were still subject to AFASS' approval. Some of the documents that had to be compiled included a negative certification of debt from the Municipal Revenue Collection Center (CRIM, the Spanish acronym), the Department of the Treasury, and the Administration for Child Support Enforcement (ASUME, the Spanish acronym). This process could take months to complete. After the Court issued an order (at the joint request of plaintiffs and defendants) allowing the Chief Health Care Coordinator to process contracts, the process is presently completed in just a few days.
56. During the time that it takes to process a contract for professional services, the professional is not paid, even though he or she was performing services for the CHP. The CHP would compensate the professional by means of a "debt resolution." Under a debt resolution system, the actual payment is made after a contract is approved. The executive director of AFASS can approve a debt resolution up to a certain amount but beyond that amount, it must be approved by the Secretary of Health. Currently, however, the executive director of AFASS is the Secretary of Health. Typically, in agencies other than the DOH, a debt resolution is used to pay for services rendered on a one-time basis, where there is no contract. If a contract is being processed, then the agency does not issue debt resolutions. Initially, payment by debt resolution was made during the time that contracts were pending at AFASS, but later, the process was changed so that debt resolutions were issued only after the contract was approved. The Secretary of Health, however, has tried to limit the use of debt resolutions. In effect, this leaves the CHP in a difficult situation because it cannot offer contract employees immediate pay while contracts are pending, but it cannot offer them debt resolutions either. See Exhibits 179-198, 227-237. In July 1995, AFASS notified the CHP that it no longer would pay contract professionals whose contracts were pending renewal until after the contract was renewed. Under this arrangement professionals had to work for extended periods of time without being paid. Exhibits 228, 229.
57. Prior to August 1996, doctors on duty were paid $18 per hour, and it was extremely difficult to get anyone to work for that money. Beginning approximately in August 1996, doctors on duty were paid $22 an hour from Monday to Friday night and $25 an hour on weekends and holidays. This modest raise has not resolved the problems of recruiting doctors to work at night and on weekends because at medical facilities covered by the health reform, night and weekend shifts are paid $30 to $35 an hour. In June of 1996 and June of 1997, many

professionals under contract positions resigned because the money they were paid was too low and because the facilities were grossly inadequate.
58. The CHP cannot pay per diem and mileage to the doctors on duty. In 1996 the CHP paid mileage to the personnel under contract but was not authorized to pay per diem.
59. The large number of transitory employees and regular positions in the CHP has resulted in instability within the work place. The transitory positions offer some measure of stability, but those positions tend to be extended after expiration of the initial term on a month-to-month basis, offering the employees little assurance that their positions will remain available in the long term.
60. The CHP can offer no incentives for the economic betterment of its personnel. The CHP cannot provide any economic incentives to reward good work or merit. Contract personnel in the CHP have no fringe benefits except for mileage. The bureaucratic and budgetary obstacles to recruiting and retaining qualified personnel result in a loss of motivation among the personnel. Correctional Health professional staff complain that the personnel system is too complicated and bureaucratic. The budgetary and bureaucratic obstacles to recruiting and retaining professional staff negatively affect the ability of the administrators of the CHP to monitor the quality of services delivered to the penal population. The CHP cannot recruit the necessary staff it needs to operate efficiently 167 because the difference in the budget appropriated to the program in relation to the actual *167 payroll expenses of the program in previous years is inadequate.
61. The number of regular employees increased between March 1996 and June 1997 as a result of a law passed in 1996 that granted regular status in permanent positions to certain transitory employees. Exhibit 543. The CHP experienced substantial instability in staffing levels during the period from April 1995 through June 1997. Exhibit 590. The CHP experienced a substantial decrease in recruitment, and a consequential decrease in staffing levels, in June 1996 after the adoption of Law 150. This law established a two-year waiting period before a person who had worked for the government could be re-hired into government service. Furthermore, the Program's recruitment efforts declined in September, October, November, and December 1996 because of the electoral law's prohibition on hiring personnel for sixty days before and after a general election. Exhibits 590, 545. [11] A precipitous decline in recruitment was experienced by the CHP in June 1995 because a hiring freeze was implemented at the Department of Health. Exhibits 590, 545. The CHP experienced a decline in the number of registered nurses employed by the program in May and June of 1996. The program recovered from the decline following July 1996 after the promulgation of Administrative Order 112, but experienced another decline after February 1997 because the prohibition on hiring imposed by the electoral law in the months following the 1996 election ended and nurses started seeking employment with other governmental agencies. Exhibits 547, 595, 596. The experience of the CHP in recruiting and retaining registered nurses during 1995, 1996, and 1997 was very disheartening.
62. In August 1997, the CHP could not hire nurses for Camp La Pica because of budgetary shortfalls. The shortage of nurses at La Pica had to be covered by transferring nurses from the Ponce correctional facilities. It became very difficult at times to effectuate said transfer due to the resistance and protests of the nurses selected to be transferred to La Pica.
63. The CHP is not complying with the Medical and Mental Health Plans in part due to the difficulties it faces hiring and retaining personnel. Said difficulties are caused by factors foreign to the functioning of the Program.
64. A serious setback in the ability of the CHP to recruit qualified professional personnel occurred in 1995 when the Government Ethics Law was amended to mandate a two-year prohibition or waiting period before awarding employment contracts to persons who formerly held civil service positions with the government. This amendment, knows as Law 150, created problems for the CHP because one of the sources available to it for recruitment of health professionals comprised those individuals who had just completed a mandatory one-year public service requirement. These persons were considered "civil servants" under the statute, and thus were subject to the twoyear waiting period. It was possible depending on the circumstances to obtain a waiver from said prohibition. The waiver had to be obtained from either the Government Ethics Office or the Central Office of Personnel Administration (OCAP, the Spanish acronym). The delays confronted in obtaining a waiver, in most cases, was too costly to significantly improve recruitment.

65. Unfortunately, OCAP and the Government's Ethics Office (OEG, the Spanish acronym) had conflicting interpretations of Law 150. OCAP was of the opinion that the mandatory year of public service did not fall within Law 150. The OEG not only concluded otherwise, but also insisted that OCAP had not authority to interpret Law 150 in such cases. In addition, the OEG opined that a person who had obtained a waiver from the application of 168 Law 150 was required to apply for a second waiver when that person's contract was renewed, even if there was *168 no change in the substantive terms of the original contract. Following the entry of the Court's order of May 16, 1997, the CHP ceased requiring waivers for persons who already had obtained a waiver but whose contracts were up for renewal. The CHP, nevertheless, was not able to recover from the detrimental effects of Law 150 on its recruitment efforts. As a result of the passage of Law 150, the CHP lost 14 professionals because that were not granted waivers. These included general practitioners, psychologists, dentists, occupational therapy assistants, physical education teachers, and medical coordinators.[12] The defendants have not shown that any effort was made to solve these bureaucratic conflicts in spite of the dire consequences which they directly caused to the quality of the health care provided to the members of plaintiffs' class.
66. The CHP attempted to fill positions with independent contractors because the program could not offer salaries to professionals for permanent employment positions that were competitive with private sector opportunities. By offering them contracts instead of permanent employment positions the program was able to offer higher salaries. Although this practice is fairly common throughout the Department of Health since the department's salary scales are too low to attract qualified professionals for employment, the CHP was not very successful in its efforts to recruit personnel.
67. The CHP began to develop a personnel office in 1994. The creation of a personnel office within the CHP was authorized by Administrative Order No. 66 of June 3, 1993, which also allowed the program to appoint employees and to contract for professional services. The CHP began to recruit personnel in April 1994 until July 1994, at which time it had to suspend recruitment because of a June 1994 moratorium on hiring at the Department of Health. The moratorium on hiring declared in June 1994 continues in effect as to permanent positions and irregular positions, but the CHP has managed to hire professionals as independent contractors. The program also had to seek the intervention of the Governor's Personal Representative to cover positions at the Ponce Complex when that complex became an intake center. Even though the program obtained the requested assistance, there was considerable delay in staffing the intake center.
68. A second Administrative Order, Number 112, issued in July 1996, delegated further authority to the CHP in making hiring decisions. The program's ability to make use of the authority granted by Administrative Orders 66 and 112 has been curtailed by a number of hiring moratoria. The Secretary of Health insisted that all irregular appointments required the approval of the deputy director of AFASS. This requisite meant that the delegation under Administrative Order 66 had little effect. Nevertheless, the CHP experienced a substantial increase in staffing levels during the months following July 1996, when Administrative Order 112 delegated to the program's newly created personnel office the authority to create transitory positions.
69. Although the June 1994 moratorium continued in effect, it was conditionally lifted in October 1994 to allow the program to fill regular positions, provided that such positions were first to be offered to qualified DOH employees who had been displaced by the privatization of health services and by persons referred to CHP by the Right to Employment Administration. If no personnel was available from these two sources, then the CHP was permitted to recruit from outside the DOH. Only if the Deputy Secretary of Health issued a written certification that there were no candidates available under the health reform, could the program recruit from other sources. The requirement that the CHP recruit from among DOH employees displaced by the health reform led to a number of 169 problems. For example, the *169 Secretary of Health transferred a number of displaced DOH employees to the CHP without first notifying the CHP's central office. In addition, the Executive Director of the CHP made a number of attempts to obtain a list of available personnel displaced by the health reform, but the list was not provided until late 1994, several months after the directive was issued. Until then the CHP continued recruiting personnel from the other sources up to December 1994. It was then that the Secretary of Health announced that all irregular appointments had to be submitted for approval to the deputy director of AFASS. The CHP made numerous efforts to recruit DOH personnel displaced by the health reform from 1994 through 1997, but many of the candidates

that were available did not want to work in the prisons. A large number of them did not even show up for interviews with the institutional medical directors.
70. The CHP has been losing ground steadily since 1996 in recruiting and retaining personnel. During 1997, the program lost the executive director, its director of mental health services, the director of the psychology section, the pharmacy director, and the director of the control of infectious diseases (who was replaced in July 1997). In 1996 the program lost its engineer, its director of quality improvement, its director of dental services, and previously in 1995, the program lost its personnel director. With the exception of the director of the area of infectious disease control, the program has not been able to replace any of the other directors it has lost. The program suffers from a high rate of turnover, which currently stands at the rate of 50% throughout the system. This high rate of turnover affects proportionately, in negative way, the continuity of care provided to patients in the institutions. The conditions at the physical facilities of the AOC institutions have made it difficult to recruit personnel. Another difficulty when recruiting personnel is the fear that prospective recruits have to work in a prison setting. At times, the CHP has had to stop recruitment because of budgetary difficulties. At other times, the program has had the budget, but there were no candidates available. Still at other times the budget has been available and candidates have been recruited, but because of some bureaucratic impediment, they were not hired.
71. It is impossible to cover every aspect of health care delivery when the program suffers from shortages of key personnel. The shortage of CHP staff at the institutional level has severe consequences on the ability to provide health care to inmates. For example, the effect of the amendment to the Government Ethics Law (Law 150) meant that admission services were curtailed or eliminated at some institutions, resulting in numerous inmates with undetected health conditions entering the prison system.
72. Other factors which impact on staff retention are the frustration that the personnel feel when they are not able to move the Program towards greater compliance with the court's orders; the difficulty in replacing lost personnel because it cannot compete with the private sector in terms of salary and benefits; the crowded and inadequate facilities where the health services are provided; and the lack of adequate equipment.
73. It may take six to eight months to fully train CHP staff before they become familiarized with the institutions and the Program's policies. Each time the Program loses personnel this represents a loss of a significant investment in time and resources even if the person leaving is immediately replaced.
74. The dedication and quality of the CHP personnel are simply not enough of a driving force to continue to improve the correctional health services offered. People can burn out, which in turn, causes the fragile system that is in place to collapse.
75. The CHP also lacks the necessary staff to cover the infectious disease program at the central level. In particular, the program lacks a statistician. The absence of staff in this area means that certain duties that need to be performed by specially trained staff are carried by other health care staff.
76. One specific area of great concern to the court is the decline in the mental health staffing levels. It is very 170 difficult to find *170 mental health providers who want to work in a correctional environment. The problem exists
at both the retention and recruiting stages. The requisite staffing levels for the mental health care component of the CHP were established as a result of a mental health staffing plan that was developed after the Mental Health Plan was adopted. Since that time the demand for mental health staff has increased in the AOC, in part, because of an increase in the inmate population, and also because of an increase in the number of acute psychiatric cases being admitted from the free community.[13] Statistics for the program show that after a marked improvement in staffing in the types of mental health provided between 1993 and 1996, these fell overall during the 1996-1997 fiscal year. The reasons encountered in recruiting personnel to provide mental health services are two-fold: first, most mental health professionals gravitate to the San Juan area, thereby reducing the number of potential candidates for facilities outside of the metropolitan area; second, the CHP cannot compete with the private sector, with ASSMCA, or with the health reform, since the program cannot offer competitive salaries or fringe benefits.

77. The program has taken steps to expand the amount of coverage provided with the short numbers of staff it has, but even so, not all areas are covered. For example, to cover the shortage of psychologists providing admission services, CHP personnel are in the admissions areas from 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. The Mental Health Plan requires that admission areas be staffed 24 hours per day. Similar measures are taken anent emergency areas. The shortage of personnel at the Sabana Hoyos Correctional Institution for approximately three months prior to September 1997 was so acute that the CHP was not able to provide full-time admissions or emergency areas coverage.
78. The CHP cannot provide on-call physicians to cover emergency services at smaller institutions. The Comptroller of Puerto Rico has concluded that it is illegal to pay on-call physicians that are not on-site during the time that they are on-call. Nevertheless, using on-call physicians to cover emergency needs is standard medical procedure. (This is the single instance of a stumbling block that the court can find that does not originate with the defendants. The Comptroller is an autonomous entity. The defendants, however, did nothing to challenge the Comptroller's ruling.)
79. The CHP has only 50 percent of the dentists it needs. It is difficult to recruit dentists because the Commonwealth's health reform program includes very generous dental care coverage, which means that dentists can make substantially more money in the private sector than at the CHP. As explained elsewhere in these findings, dentists (as well as other CHP personnel) also are difficult to recruit because of inadequate facilities, supplies and equipment.
80. In spite of significant improvements in health education, the CHP still does not have a sufficient number of health educators to train correctional officers and for in-service training of health personnel. The program requires six or seven more health educators.
Personnel Problems at the Three Main Correctional Complexes[14]
81. The CHP is plagued by a high turn-over of physicians and shortages of staff at the institutional level. The 171 admissions area at the State Penitentiary complex in Río Piedras suffers from a lack of physicians. *171 On
many occasions there are no physicians on duty during the night hours. The constant resignation of the doctors ascribed to the admissions area of the Río Piedras complex detrimentally affects the completion of the inmates' intake health evaluations. In 1995, the completion of intake evaluations within seven days of admission was 30.6%; by 1996, this rate had increased to 90%. After May 1996, however, the rate dropped to around 50%. The recruitment of physicians for the Río Piedras complex is very difficult. Employment under contract is not attractive to physicians because there are no fringe benefits available. Until recently, physicians who had just completed the required year of public service were ineligible to work for CHP by contract because of recent amendments to government ethics statutes. Another factor that affects negatively the recruitment of physicians is the risk factor of working within a prison setting. The program cannot offer sufficient incentives to compete with the private sector in the recruitment of psychiatrists at the Río Piedras complex.
82. Admission services available at night and during the weekends at the Ponce Complex are staffed with physician, nurses, and medical record personnel until 11:00 p.m., although admission services should be staffed 24 hours per day. The recruitment of personnel for night duty is made by professional service contracts. The CHP has encountered problems recruiting personnel for the Ponce Complex because of competition from the private sector and from the health reform. As a result of the health reform carried out in the municipalities near Ponce there exist job opportunities for physicians offering better salaries, working conditions, and personal security than those offered at the Ponce complex. The complex does not have a gynecologist or obstetrician for the women's facility. The chronic care clinic for young adults and the women's facility is staffed with a family medicine practitioner. The lack of physicians for the complex as a whole results in only 2 percent of the population having access to sick call services. At least three or four more physicians are needed, especially in the maximum security area, where two physicians are required to cover sick call. Currently, only one is available and there have been months when no physicians were available. The dispersion of medical services throughout the complex stretches to its limits the personnel that are available, whereas centralization of these services would result in a

more efficient use of available personnel. The complex is short of dentists. The young adults intermediate psychiatric care unit is staffed with a director (who is a social worker) and a psychiatrist during Saturdays. The shortages of personnel affect the delivery of care to the patients and also makes it difficult to retain the personnel, who leave as they become frustrated as a result of said shortages. Only one psychiatrist, who works 120 hours a month, is assigned to cover the ambulatory services plus the admission patient referrals at Ponce Main, young adults, women, and Ponce Maximum. Another psychiatrist, who works 40 hours per month, divides his time between the two intermediate care modules at the complex.
83. The Bayamón facility also suffers from a lack of personnel. The admission process at the Bayamón complex never has been carried out in a continuous fashion because of a lack of physicians to perform the admission examinations. Part of the difficulty in recruiting personnel is the scarcity of X-ray services. Doctors have refused employment at Bayamón because they cannot count on the use of X-rays as a diagnostic tool in completing evaluations. Other factors which contribute to the difficulty of recruiting health personnel at Bayamón is the lack of security and the great number of patients needing medical treatment. One of the tactics used by CHP personnel to cover admission services is assigning off-duty physicians to night duty. Thus, some physicians at the complex in effect work 80-hour weeks. Some of the physicians have threatened to resign because of the stress this places on them.
84. The Río Piedras complex lost one of its two X-ray technicians in October 1995. The remaining technician was not sufficient to cover the demand generated by new admissions. Although a second technician finally was 172 recruited in July 1997, the two that *172 are presently there are not sufficient to cover all shifts.
Additional Personnel Insufficiencies
85. The CHP does not have an ophthalmologist.
86. Additional staff will be necessary to properly administer triple therapy treatment for HIV patients. In particular, physicians who specialize in infectious diseases must perform the initial evaluations and the initial follow-ups for such patients in order to design the optimal treatment plan. The infectious disease specialists also should perform periodic supervision of the treatment these patients are receiving.
87. In spite of the difficulties in finding and retaining qualified staff, the persons that the CHP does manage to recruit are highly competent and extremely committed to the process of providing correctional health care services. Those who testified at the hearing however, made it abundantly clear that they cannot hold out much longer under the present circumstances and that some drastic changes must occur. Although the various medical directors testified about their personal experiences, they also stated that many other health care personnel under their supervision felt the same way.
Employee Discipline
88. By virtue of Administrative Order 66, the CHP's personnel office commenced filing for disciplinary proceedings against CHP staff with AFASS but no action was forthcoming. In early 1995, the director of the personnel office of the CHP visited AFASS to inquire as to the status of the disciplinary cases referred to it and was told that AFASS had too much work and too many disciplinary cases from the Department of Health. It was then that the Chief Health Care Coordinator requested permission from the Secretary of Health to contract a lawyer to process the disciplinary cases. Although authorization was granted, the CHP encountered numerous obstacles anent the attorney's contract. After having rendered services for some time, the contract for the attorney retained by the CHP to process the disciplinary cases was not renewed and another attorney, chosen by the legal division of the Department of Health, but paid for from the Program's budget, was assigned. The attorney selected by the Department of Health's legal division to process disciplinary cases for the CHP was completely unfavorable to the program. In January 1997, the Secretary of Health peremptorily ordered the immediate cessation of legal services for disciplinary matters and ordered the CHP to contact the services of a private law firm.

89. The disciplinary actions processed by the CHP through AFASS involved permanent employees and those transitory employees with an expectation of a contract lasting more than one year. There are several reasons why an efficient employee disciplinary program is important, including deterring employees from infractions of the rules, thus ensuring order in the functioning of the program. The inefficiency in processing disciplinary matters in the CHP threatens these goals. For example, in early 1996, a number of CHP staff participated in an illegal strike at the Río Piedras Complex. Although AFASS was asked to take disciplinary action against these employees, six months later nothing had been done. One CHP employee was the subject of numerous complaints at the Arecibo District Jail in 1996. The Secretary of Health was asked to take some action against the employee, but almost nine months later, the Secretary still had not responded to the request. In early 1995, the Chief Health Care Coordinator requested the assistance of the Secretary of Health in dismissing a problematic CHP employee, but almost two years later the situation remained unresolved.
90. Disciplinary action is ineffective because cases are not energetically and promptly prosecuted. For example, the program currently has 52 disciplinary cases that have been pending between two to three years at different levels in the process of adjudication. It can take months to prepare a disciplinary case for presentation to the Secretary of Health for action. Then, the disciplinary regulations which cover the CHP staff are general regulations developed for AFASS and the DOH and do not take into consideration the particular concerns 173 relevant to a correctional setting such as security. *173 Because the disciplinary regulations which apply to CHP staff are not geared to a correctional setting, the program does not have the tools that would facilitate the enforcement of adequate discipline measures in the correctional setting. The absence of a prompt and effective disciplinary system for CHP staff lowers the morale of those that do not violate the regulations. They come to feel that the system has a greater concern for those who do not comply with applicable norms than for those that do.
Facilities
91. Admission into the Puerto Rico prison system currently is done through the Bayamón, Ponce, and Río Piedras Complexes, and at the Vega Alta and Sabana Hoyos correctional institutions.
92. Among the weaknesses identified during the strategic evaluation performed in 1996 was the inadequacy of the physical facilities available for providing correctional health services. Crowded, unsecure and inadequate physical facilities is one of the factors making it difficult to hire and retain health care personnel. The physical setting in which health care is provided in the AOC system affects the ability of specialists in various disciplines to work together, particularly in the larger institutions, where services are scattered among different buildings. This is especially true in Río Piedras, Bayamón, and Ponce, where the scattering of services makes supervision almost impossible. Insufficient clinical space at the prisons also has made it difficult to provide subspecialty clinics on-site.
93. Acute mental health care for inmates is provided at the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, which opened in August 1996. Only one of the three modules 0907 which module has 54 beds 0907 is currently in use. The criteria for psychiatric hospitalization is acute decompensation exhibiting psychotic symptomatology, suicidal ideation and severe depression, or drug addiction-related symptomatology with psychiatric decompensation.
94. During an outreach performed by Correctional Health staff in 1997, 17 inmates were identified as requiring hospitalization, yet only 11 of these inmates could be hospitalized for lack of psychiatric hospital beds. Some of these inmates have been waiting two to three months for a bed in the hospital. Optimally, when a patient is diagnosed as requiring psychiatric hospitalization, the patient should be immediately hospitalized. The Correctional Psychiatric Hospital remains partially open because the AOC cannot provide the 45 correctional officer needed to provide security for the hospital.
95. The CHP also does not have sufficient PICU (psychiatric intensive care unit) beds for the number of patients who require that level of care. The Plans require a total of 25 beds for emergency mental health care in the Puerto Rico prison system. Currently, the system has only 20 beds for emergency mental health care: 14 at Río Piedras, 2 at Ponce, and 4 at Vega Alta. None of the other intake centers have emergency mental health care beds. The PICU at the Río Piedras complex must serve all of the male institutions on the island because the

Ponce facility, with only two beds, is not sufficient. Consolidating emergency mental health care services at the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital would allow the CHP to render better services to the inmate population. Because of the unavailability of physical facilities generally for correctional health services, the PICU area also houses the offices of the regional epidemiologist, the health services coordinator for the Río Piedras complex, two health educators, and two other staff persons not directly related with the mental health care services.
96. There is also an acute shortage of medical dormitory beds. There are only 32 medical dormitory beds currently in use; these are located at the Río Piedras State Penitentiary, which means that only pre-trial detainees can be housed there. Ten medical dormitory beds at Annex 504 have been unavailable for a year and a half because of reconstruction work performed under the Facilities Rehabilitation Program. Although there is an area designated as a medical dormitory at the Bayamón Complex, the AOC places inmates in that area that do not require health care services. There used to be 25 beds at Ponce Main designated as a medical dormitory, but the 174 AOC requested use of the beds for non-health care purposes *174 in 1995. The AOC has never returned those beds to be used for medical purposes only. There is no medical dormitory (or infirmary) at the Sabana Hoyos Correctional institution, nor is there an intermediate psychiatric facility there. There used to be nine medical dormitory beds at Guayama, but the area where those beds are located is also under repairs. Finally, there are 24 medical dormitory beds at Ponce Maximum, but the beds originally were designed to be used as segregation beds, and inmates who are assigned to that medical dormitory refuse to go there thereby jeopardizing their health.
97. The CHP is not in compliance with the standards for provision of chronic illness care, in part because of the shortage of chronic care beds. Moreover, the program cannot control which inmates are assigned to beds in medical dormitories, and the AOC indiscriminately assigns inmates who do not require chronic care to those beds. The AOC simply has no system for determining whether an inmate meets medical criteria for placement in medical dormitories or intermediate psychiatric units.
98. In addition to using medical dormitory beds for nonmedical purposes, the AOC also has used intermediate psychiatry beds for non-medical uses. Although infirmary beds are not included in the census of the AOC general population, medical dormitory beds are included. It would assist the CHP in administering its responsibilities if medical dormitories and intermediate psychiatric beds were excluded from the inventory of beds counted for crowding purposes. The inclusion of these extended care beds in the general population inventory places pressure on the AOC to use the beds for non-health care purposes.
99. The prison system in Puerto Rico also lacks isolation facilities. In order to effectively deal with infectious diseases, the CHP requires protective isolation and respiratory isolation facilities to control outbreaks of diseases like tuberculosis, as well as to comply with OSHA regulations. Isolation rooms should be checked at least every month and the air changes in the rooms should be monitored. Failure of the isolation rooms to work correctly increases the probability of an outbreak of disease among inmates and staff. The infirmary at the Río Piedras complex does have three isolation rooms, but these facilities cannot be used for that purpose because they lack the special equipment required to minimize the risk of spreading diseases to the personnel in the infirmary. In particular, the rooms lack ultra violet lamps, which have never been installed, and the split unit air conditioners and retractors are not functioning. The Ponce Complex also has two isolation rooms in the main institution and four in the maximum security infirmary but they have never been used because the ventilation systems required for such rooms were never installed.
100. The physical facilities on the first and second floors of the hospital at the Río Piedras Complex are unsuitable for their intended purpose. The dental area is very small and more chairs are needed in order to render services to more patients at the same time. Also, there are only two holding cells on the first floor and two on the second floor to keep the inmates awaiting their medical appointments. Each cell holds ten inmates. These are not large enough for the number of patients seen at the hospital. Also, when inmates from different institutions are brought to the clinics, they must be separated from each other for security reasons. Thus, the clinics cannot be used to their full capacity.
101. Both the medical records area and the pharmacy area at the Río Piedras complex are overcrowded, a deficiency pointed out by both the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the Department of Health. The Department of Health also found numerous other deficiencies during an inspection of the State Penitentiary

hospital. For example, the alarm system was broken, warehouses were without smoke detectors, cockroaches were found in different areas, water leak marks on the ceiling and biomedical waste was improperly stored in a room beside the laboratory. Because of these deficiencies, the accreditation of the hospital at the time of the 175 hearing was in jeopardy. If the Department of Health withdraws the accreditation of the hospital, the *175 ensuing reduction in services would detrimentally affect the entire inmate population.
102. A shortage of beds at the detox area and in the infirmary at the Río Piedras complex makes it impossible to place all inmates suffering from withdrawal symptoms in those areas. Inmates suffering from withdrawal symptoms must therefore be provided treatment through ambulatory services. This situation impacts their health significantly. This same problem exists at the Ponce Complex, which has only 13 infirmary beds. Of approximately 150 admissions to the infirmary each month, around 135 of the patients are suffering from withdrawal symptoms. The shortage of beds means that many of these withdrawal patients must be treated through ambulatory services. This type of treatment is dangerous because such patients suffer from dehydration, blood pressure problems, cardiac problems, mental problems such as change of personality, and they require constant supervision. The Bayamón Complex also suffers from a shortage of infirmary beds with the same attendant problems.
103. The San Juan Correctional Institution, also known as Annex 504 or "Las Malvinas", has two modules that serve as intermediate psychiatric services modules. Mental health patients housed in the intermediate care modules suffer from severe chronic mental conditions and require continuous supervision in order to perform their everyday tasks. These modules at Annex 504 in Río Piedras lack nurses' stations and are located far away from the interdisciplinary team that serves these patients. Thus, the Correctional Health staff rely on custodial officers to escort them into the modules. Because of a constant unavailability of custodial officers, however, the opportunities to provide medical services to inmates in the intermediate care modules are limited. The intermediate care area also suffers from lack of water, which results in unsanitary conditions.
104. The absence of water in the higher floors of the State Penitentiary and Annex 504 diminishes the willingness of inmates to attend clinics and sick call because they cannot bathe or shave. Also, when there is no water in the hospital at the Río Piedras complex, the dental clinics have to be suspended.
105. The Correctional Health facilities at Ponce Main and Ponce Maximum have problems with the air conditioning system each summer. The intermediate psychiatric services areas at the Ponce Complex also suffer from electrical problems which affect the continuity of services to the inmates.
106. The Bayamón Complex also has inadequate physical facilities. For example, dental services must be provided in the same place where sick call and internal medicine clinics are carried out. The number of services rendered results in an enormous volume of patients in a small area. At Bayamón 448, there is no work-space for nursing and medical personnel, thus, the only service rendered at that facility is the delivery of medication. Patients must be taken to Bayamón 308 for treatment and examination. The medical dormitory at Bayamón 1072 lacks the most fundamental amenities of a medical dormitory. There are no ramps for handicapped patients, there is no hot water, and there are no facilities to perform medical examinations within the unit. Although the medical dormitory has a capacity of 36 patients, the AOC houses inmates in the module for security or disciplinary reasons, thus reducing the number of patients who can be housed there for medical reasons. These problems affect not only the health of the medical patients but also their safety. At times, the number of disciplinary cases in the medical dormitory has equaled the number of medical cases. The Bayamón facilities suffer from a lack of adequate sanitation and bathing facilities and a lack of hot water. While undergoing intake evaluation, inmates at Bayamón are housed in dilapidated and unsanitary conditions which the Court personally inspected, along with counsel for the parties.
107. Medical facilities at the Sabana Hoyos Correctional Institution are inadequate, both in terms of space and because the equipment is old and outdated.
108. The lack of space and equipment compromises the medical care provided. In Río Piedras, the lack of space 176 results in a *176 number of inmates answering health staff's questions in close proximity to each other, thus
compromising confidentiality and security.

109. CHP staff have identified 26 patients in the AOC system with antisocial personality disorders, who exhibit symptomatology, at times, of self mutilation, acute brief psychotic episodes or suicidal attempts or gestures. Those patients are extremely disruptive within the system and exhibit highly abusive behavior toward other inmates. Although the CHCC has requested that 26 to 30 beds be designated for these inmates from several AOC administrators, none of them have responded to the requests.
110. The only physical therapy clinic and optometry clinic in the AOC system are located at the Río Piedras Complex. These clinics serve all of the institutions on the island, including patients from privatized institutions. Inmates incarcerated near Río Piedras have more access to the optometry clinic than do inmates located farther from Río Piedras. This is also true for physical therapy clinic. There is only one physical therapist and one optometrist to serve the entire inmate population on the Island. The Río Piedras complex does not have a physiatrist to make referrals to physical therapy. The complex depends on referrals to the Medical Center in Río Piedras.
111. During the intake process at the Río Piedras complex, prisoners receive services at the infirmary and at the PICU. Patients at the different out-patient clinics also receive services at the hospital, located adjacent to the State Penitentiary. All chest X-rays that are ordered at the complex are taken at the hospital. The inmates who are going through the admissions process are housed in modules A-2 and C-2, each with a capacity for 14 inmates, and in modules B-1 and C-1, each with a capacity for 75 inmates. This commingling of inmates and functions in substandard physical facilities delays or impedes the delivery of health care services, causes health hazards, and creates serious unacceptable security conditions.
112. The medical area at the State Penitentiary has only one holding cell with capacity for 10 inmates. This affects the admission process because only ten inmates at a time are allowed to wait their turn for medical evaluations. If more than ten inmates require evaluations, they may not all be seen immediately.
113. The AOC is housing inmates in the admissions area at the Ponce complex even though the inmates are not admission cases since there is no space in the general population cells to house these inmates. The AOC promised the Court that the inmates would be moved. However, they assigned numbers to three cells to use them to expand the housing capacity. This leaves the admissions area with only two cells and a reduced space where newly admitted inmates can be held. This also promotes mixing of newly admitted inmates with general population inmates. At Ponce Main, patients wait to be processed for admission first at the AOC holding cells and then at the Ponce Main holding cells. There are five holding cells at Ponce Main; each has a capacity from 12 to 15 inmates. When these holding cells are overcrowded, the AOC uses the holding cells in the medical area. Sometimes the AOC houses inmates in the medical area's holding cells for four to five days. There is only one bathroom for the five cells and occasionally only one officer to supervise them.
114. Because newly admitted inmates and general population inmates are mixed in the admissions area, inmates from different gangs sometimes come into contact with each other, which creates substantial security problems. Thus, the security of staff and patients is compromised.
115. On the first floor of Ponce Max is an emergency room area and a dental services area. There also is a medical dormitory where inmates with chronic diseases, paraplegics, and persons with physical impediments are housed. The Ponce Max medical dormitory serves the entire Ponce Complex, as well as all the institutions in the southern region of Puerto Rico, including Fort Allen, La Pica, Guayama, and occasionally Mayaguez, located on the West coast of Puerto Rico, and Sabana Hoyos, located in the Northwest part of the Island.
177 *177 116. In Bayamón, the admissions services are integrated with other medical services. The admission process is carried out in the same place and at the same time as dental, pharmaceutical, internal medicine, and chronic services. Because of the mixing of all these services at the same time and in the same place, inmates from different gangs may come into contact with each other, which results in security problems for the inmates and the medical personnel.
117. Dental services at the Bayamón Complex are offered at Bayamón 308, which also covers dental patients from Bayamón 448. Dental services are offered at Bayamón 1072, where patients from Bayamón 292 also are served. There are no X-ray services available in these areas. The dental services at Bayamón 1072 are rendered

in the same area where the delivery of medications and sick call and all internal medicine clinics are carried out. Because so many services are rendered in the same area, the volume of patients is enormous. Because there usually is only one officer available, the medical services director must at times order the suspension of dental services at Bayamón 1072.
118. The medical services provided at Bayamón 1072 are dental, sick call, and internal medicine services. Bayamón 1072 is the only area in the entire complex where emergency services are rendered, together with hospitalization services, infirmary services, and psycho-social intermediate services.
Equipment and Supplies
119. Because AFASS fails to pay suppliers, the CHP has not received medical supplies, such as gloves, disposal gowns, office materials, eyeglasses prescribed by the optometrist, and X-ray film. Lack of equipment at some institutions hampers the completion of intake health evaluations.
120. The lack of supplies in the emergency area at the State Penitentiary hospital hampers efforts to provide emergency services. The Bayamón Complex also suffers from a shortage of emergency room equipment. The emergency area at the Ponce Complex has only one gurney.
121. Two years ago an X-ray machine was purchased for the Sabana Hoyos Correctional Institution. Because that institution did not have the appropriate physical facilities in which to install the machine it was sent to the Río Piedras complex, where it was to be installed in the admissions area of the State Penitentiary. The installation of this machine would avoid the problem of transporting newly-admitted inmates at the State Penitentiary to the hospital for chest X-rays. The machine remained in storage for two years, and when it was finally installed in the admissions area, other facilities, however, necessary to use the machine 0907 a dark room, correct lighting and electrical equipment 0907 were not prepared. At the Río Piedras complex, there also are shortages of X-ray film.
122. The CHP also suffers from lack of supplies and materials at the central office level. The infection control program at the CHP does not have the computer equipment necessary to perform its functions. The program suffers from a lack of functioning vehicles, which are necessary to ferry personnel, communications, and supplies between the institutions and the central office and among the institutions.[15] The infectology program cannot perform its job because statistics must be compiled by hand and the CHP does not have an effective inmate 178 tracking system. This results in a very inefficient and too slow a process which is not of much use to the *178 CHP. The infection control program is not complying with current professional standards of medical treatment because of the difficulty of obtaining accurate statistics. The incompleteness of the infection control program results in an increased risk to the inmate population because the lack of information hinders early treatment of diseases. Moreover, the lack of information makes it difficult for the infectious disease program to make accurate recommendations concerning the control of infectious diseases in the AOC system. The spread of opportunistic infections in AOC institutions can affect staff members as well as inmates, if those staff have compromised immune systems.
123. The lack of ambulances is a widespread problem throughout the AOC system. Although the AOC purchased ambulances for every institution approximately two and a half years ago, the purchase has not resolved the shortage of ambulances because the AOC does not follow the guidelines for using the ambulances that were established by the CHP and signed by the Administrator of the AOC. It took two years for the AOC to forward to the CHP a list of correctional officers who are qualified to drive the ambulances.
Non-Performance by the Administration of Correction
124. Conditions in some medical dormitories 0907 which are controlled by the AOC-are so bad that inmates in need of treatment refuse to be placed in them, especially when the dormitories are used also to house dangerous or aggressive prisoners. Because inmates refuse to be placed in medical dormitories, and instead reside in the general population, chronically ill inmates who require constant supervision do not receive that supervision and their health is thus endangered.

125. The AOC is also unable to transport inmates to offsite medical appointments. Although the CHP staff is able to obtain appointments for inmates at offsite specialty clinics, AOC staff have been almost uniformly unable or unwilling to take inmates to those appointments. The AOC does not have sufficient vehicles or staff for security or transportation purposes.
126. The Administration persistently transfers inmates from one institution to another without the inmates' files being reviewed by CHP personnel to determine whether the inmates' medical needs can be met at the institution to which the inmate is transferred. Not all institutions offer the same level of care. It would be inefficient and prohibitively expensive to offer the same range of services at all institutions. Thus, the CHP offers greater levels of medical coverage at some institutions than at others. In terms of the placement of inmates, those who suffer from certain medical conditions cannot be transferred to just any institution. For this reason, prior to transferring an inmate, the AOC must first consult with CHP staff to determine if there are medical contraindications for the transfer. The AOC routinely ignores this requirement. In addition, inmates are frequently transferred without their medical files. This represents an unwarranted danger to the health of the inmate if he or she requires a level of medical care that is not available at the new institution.
127. In addition to lack of facilities in AOC institutions, the inability or unwillingness of the AOC to staff the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital together with the history of deficiencies in the budget have prevented the CHP at present from using all of the beds that are available in that facility. Under an agreement between the AOC and the Department of Health, the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital is administered by the CHP, but security and custody are provided by the AOC (the facility houses and treats inmates under the AOC's custody). A study performed by the CHP has determined that there are a number of inmates in the AOC system who currently require hospitalization for mental health conditions but who are not receiving that care as a result of the lack of beds at the Hospital. Lack of space in which to provide treatment for inmates who are acutely psychotic results in profound pain and agony for those inmates. Such inmates are a threat to themselves because they can become suicidal, and to other inmates if they are prone to aggressive behavior. Such inmates also are vulnerable to 179 attacks from other inmates. They disrupt the order of *179 institutions, thus creating security hazards that must be addressed by AOC staff.
128. Although a number of housing units in AOC facilities are designated as medical dormitories, they often lack the elements necessary for true medical dormitories, such as nursing services areas, ramps for patients, hot water, examining rooms, etc. Because of a lack of infirmary beds, not all patients who require placement in an infirmary can be placed in one. Thus, for example, inmates who require observation during withdrawal from drugs or alcohol abuse may not be held in an infirmary for the necessary time.
129. Lack of coordination with the AOC hampers the completion of sick-call requests, because the AOC cannot provide sufficient numbers of custody officers to escort CHP staff to collect sick-call slips, or else cannot provide sufficient officers to accompany inmates in need of attention to the medical area. The witnesses repeatedly testified to the pervasive absence of officers needed to provide security to health care staff, to move inmates within the institutions and to transport those inmates to their outside treatment appointments or even for emergencies. This situation has reached an acute, critical point and must be remedied at once.
IV. HARM TO PLAINTIFFS
130. Since 1993, when the current Chief Health Care Coordinator was appointed, until 1995, the Correctional Health Program made remarkable progress in specific areas, to wit: it recruited more and better qualified professional staff; it greatly improved pharmacy services; it expanded the number and types of services provided to inmates achieving the level of care required by current professional standards, and it improved the quality of services provided to inmates. As a benchmark of acceptable professional performance, the Health Care Executive Committee has established 95% compliance with each provision of the Plans as their goal. Unfortunately, deficiencies in the delivery of services to inmates persist, and in some cases these have worsened over the past two years. The progress achieved has dissolved in the face of the obstacles placed in the Program's path.

131. In virtually all key areas that can be measured statistically (including admission evaluations, ambulatory services, sick call, and extra-institutional appointments for sub-specialty services), the Correctional Health Program has been unable to achieve a professionally acceptable level of performance. During the last two years, moreover, overall rates of performance have dropped at 11 out of 16 institutions (for purposes of this assessment, each correctional complex counts as one institution). At no institution did overall performance reach the 95% level. The average rate of performance at all institutions dropped from 68.9% during the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 65.2% during the 1996-1997 fiscal year. A further analysis of key services is presented below. Services that are not susceptible to statistical analysis also are currently unacceptable by professional standards of care, as explained in more detail below.
132. In addition, the Program cannot provide consistent and timely access to emergency services for inmates. AOC inmates who are prescribed specialized diets do not receive those diets. There is one optometry clinic and one physical therapy clinic for AOC inmates, but because of the lack of transportation, inmates who are not housed at the same prison where these services are provided do not have access to those services. Neither the AOC nor the CHP has an adequate system for tracking inmates receiving medical or mental health care from one institution to another. Inmates who are transferred, therefore, are at risk for interruptions or delays in their treatment, or even incorrect treatment, which can be and has been fatal. The Correctional Health Program cannot assure that it has adequate medical supplies. Some facilities lack basic equipment necessary for the services required to be given at those facilities. For example, one of the AOC's intake centers at Sabana Hoyos has never had a functioning X-ray machine, which is necessary, among other things, to screen inmates for tuberculosis. Emergency areas in some institutions lack necessary equipment as well.
180 133. The deficiencies evidenced at the hearing are the result of systematic infirmities *180 in the correctional health care scheme, which can be characterized as (a) obstructionist interference from and inefficiency within the Department of Health and other government agencies and (b) the lack of cooperation on the part of the Administration of Correction. In brief, the Correctional Health Program has been submerged by a relentless and impenetrable miasma of bureaucracy. As a result, defendants have consistently acted to prevent the CHP from functioning properly in recruiting, contracting for, and retaining essential professional staff as well as in completing the arrangements necessary to ensure access for AOC inmates to community-based emergency, subspecialty, and hospital services. There has not been timely progress toward the renovation and construction of the health care facilities that are needed by the CHP in order to attract and retain all necessary professional staff and to ensure satisfactory and efficient medical and mental health services. The AOC lacks the necessary information systems, classification systems, and administrative capacities and commitment to cooperate effectively with the CHP in ensuring satisfactory and efficient provision and continuity of medical and mental health services.
134. It is extremely difficult to recruit professional personnel to work for the CHP. These difficulties have a number of causes. These include potential recruits' perception that working in correctional facilities is dangerous and the remote location of many correctional institutions. In addition to these issues, a number of other issues make it difficult to retain staff once hired. Among the difficulties in retaining personnel are low pay and the total lack of fringe benefits for contractual personnel, compared to that obtained in the private sector (or other government agencies), inadequate and cramped physical facilities, and lack of up-to-date equipment.
135. Because employment positions with the Department of Health and AFASS pay so little, professionals, such as physicians, physical therapists, and other specially trained health care workers cannot be hired as employees of those agencies. Instead, in order to pay a reasonable and competitive salary, the CHP must hire those professionals as independent contractors, as other health care agencies and programs do, but at times competing agencies are allowed to pay more than the CHP. These contracts must be reviewed and approved by AFASS personnel, but the process of review and approval can take months to effectuate. Because of the uncertainty inherent in waiting months for approval of a contract, health care professionals are reluctant to work for the CHP and those who do tend to leave as soon as they can obtain a position elsewhere.
136. The difficulties in recruiting and retaining staff have prevented the CHP from hiring sufficient staff to provide necessary health care services to inmates. The program never has achieved the acceptable level of staff

required according to staffing needs assessments prepared by or for the program. This lack of staff has resulted in actual harm to inmates in the AOC system.

137. Bureaucratic hostility has hampered the provision of medical services in other ways as well. The CHP has had trouble obtaining clinical services because the Secretary of Health has inexplicably and unreasonably 181 terminated contracts with outside reference laboratories.[16] AFASS, on which the *181 CHP depends for purchasing and supplies, takes inordinate amounts of time to process bids for basic materials and often fails to pay its suppliers, who understandably cut off supplies until they are paid. Whether they are paid or not is beyond the control of CHP administrators.

138. The conditions established by the evidence have caused actual pain and suffering with no conceivable penological purpose to members of the plaintiff class. Some of the deficiencies have directly resulted in inmate deaths. Delays and interruptions in the treatment of diseases, caused by inappropriate transfers and transfers without medical records, by failure to complete health evaluations upon admission to the AOC system, or by failure to provide unitary doses or to see inmates at sick call or for ambulatory services, all result in the progression of disease or in health conditions' deteriorating to a critical state. Failure to treat inmates with acute psychiatric conditions causes catastrophic pain and suffering to those inmates. Failures to provide intake evaluations result in the spread of contagious diseases that could be prevented if infected inmates are identified in time. Lack of infirmary beds results in inmates suffering from withdrawal symptoms being deprived of a controlled setting for their treatment, thus exacerbating the symptoms and consequences of withdrawal. Failure to provide triple therapy for inmates with HIV reduces the chances of being able to treat the disease effectively, and increases the likelihood of the onset of AIDS. Interruptions in the provision of medications for HIV or for tuberculosis through unitary doses reduces the effect of those medications, at best, and can produce drugresistant strains of the diseases at worst. Because of lack of access to mental health services and shortages of mental health personnel, an inordinate number of suicides have occurred in AOC institutions over the past two years. These are not generalizations or a calculus of probabilities about the pain and suffering inflicted on plaintiffs, the testimony in the recent hearings indicated that specific inmates have suffered as a result of the deficiencies in the organization of the delivery of health care services, as a causal result of the defendants' policies and decisions:

a. One inmate, who suffered from a schizoaffective disturbance was transferred to a minimum security camp. He arrived at the camp without a medical file and without his medication. The inmate never should have been transferred to the camp, due to his mental health condition, but was transferred by the AOC nonetheless. The same night that he arrived at the camp, he decompensated, entered into an acute psychotic condition, and had to be taken to the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit.

b. An inmate transferred to Camp Zarzal was admitted to the emergency area there with an acute illness. The medical staff at the camp did not have the necessary supplies to test the inmate for diabetes when he arrived there. Upon being admitted to the emergency area, he was hydrated with dextrose in water. The inmate subsequently died from diabetic toxidosis. The dextrostick was not available at Zarzal, and was not dispatched to the Camp until after the inmate's death because suppliers had not been paid by AFASS and had stopped deliveries.

c. An inmate with high blood pressure, congestive heart failure, and bronchial asthma was

transferred from the medical dormitory at Annex 504 to the medical dormitory at Ponce. The

patient refused to be housed at Ponce, and was transferred to Annex 448 0907 a general population

housing facility 0907 at Río Piedras. After a number of visits to the emergency room at the Río

Piedras Complex, the inmate was placed in Cell Block C2 of the State Penitentiary, which is

182

designated as a medical dormitory. Because of the type of crime committed by the inmate, and

*182 because he was a sentenced inmate, medical staff had to negotiate an agreement from the

inmate leaders at the State Penitentiary that he would not be harmed if he was placed in the

medical dormitory. Once medical staff had obtained this agreement from the leaders, the inmate

was placed in the medical dormitory, but AOC personnel subsequently transferred the inmate out

of the dormitory without medical authorization to Annex 352 where he could not receive the

continuous observation he needed. While at Annex 352, the inmate suffered respiratory problems and was admitted to the emergency room at the State Penitentiary, where he died of cardiac arrest.
d. A CT scan of the head and neck was ordered for a patient who was admitted to the Río Piedras Correctional complex in November 1995. The scan was ordered in November 1995 and it wasn't until April 1996 that it was conducted. The patient was released under a diversion program in June 1996, and the results of the scan still had not been received in June. In this case, where a lymphoma was suspected, no more than one week should have elapsed between the time the appointment was obtained and the CT Scan was performed. The delay in this procedure endangered the health and the life of the patient.
e. Because of the lack of a psychologist at the Ponce intake center, an inmate suffering from drug withdrawal at that center committed suicide on May 27, 1997. The inmate had been admitted for a minor crime, but did not receive the standard mental evaluation upon admission because no psychologist was on duty, even though there was supposed to be one. Thus, no one was available to determine whether the inmate was a suicide risk. The inmate also required admission to an infirmary, because of his withdrawal symptoms; had he been admitted to the infirmary, he would have been under 24-hour close supervision. There were no beds available at the time of his admission, however, and he thus lacked not only the mental health evaluation, but also the close supervision he should have received.
f. CHP staff identified a patient at Camp Punta Lima whose PPD test indicated exposure to tuberculosis; because of the lack of isolation rooms in the AOC system, this inmate could not be properly isolated pending determination of his medical status. Because the Río Piedras complex' isolation rooms were not functioning, the inmate was referred to the Humacao Regional Hospital. The hospital, however, returned the patient to Punta Lima without having any tests performed. Because of the persistence of the medical director at Punta Lima, the patient eventually was taken to be evaluated by an internist at the Río Piedras complex. A valisoscopy of the inmate's sputum was performed, and it was determined that the inmate had active tuberculosis. The CHP's epidemiologist visited Punta Lima, and identified 11 inmates who had had contact with the infected inmate, and who had converted to a positive PPD from exposure to the disease.
The Strategic Evaluation
139. In 1996, the Health Care Executive Committee conducted a strategic evaluation of the CHP. The evaluation involved all of the members of the HCEC and the office of the court monitor. Participants visited all facilities, interviewed line and leadership staff, and reviewed documents, logs, and records.
140. The strategic evaluation used 1993 as a baseline for comparison of the status of correctional health services, and covered the 1994-1995 and 1995-1996 fiscal years. The HCEC chose 1993 as the baseline because that is when the Chief Health Care Coordinator began working, and also because there really was not a lot of data available for the years prior to 1993.
141. The strategic evaluation identified the strengths and weaknesses of the program. The strengths identified by 183 the evaluation *183 included a significant increase in the number of professionals the program had been able to
recruit, that the beginnings of a fragile organized health care system were in place, that substantial progress had been made in implementing an infectious disease program, that the central office staff were working at a high level of competency and as an integrated team, and that data collection, although being done manually, was being performed, that records were legible and well-kept, that services that in 1993 existed only minimally had ben developed, such as dental services, mental health services, health education and infectious disease control, that there was a reasonable preparedness for emergencies and managing medical emergencies, and that the program had established licensing procedures and obtained licenses for its pharmacies.

142. The weaknesses identified during the strategic evaluation included inadequate physical facilities, lack of an information tracking system, lack of integration with AOC personnel, and lack of administrative flexibility. The principal threat identified during the strategic evaluation was the unavailability of resources to develop the Program.
143. At the time of the strategic evaluation in 1996, the HCEC determined that the CHP's strengths outweighed its weaknesses and that the program also had improved its ability to protect the health of the inmates. Unfortunately, the CHP has been losing ground since the strategic evaluation was conducted in 1996. What progress has been maintained is extremely fragile and could regress further if changes of a substantial nature do not take place soon.
144. Currently, the CHP is not in substantial compliance with the Plans. The program has suffered decreases in staffing levels since 1995. There has been no substantial progress in the coordination of medical services between the AOC and the CHP. Not all specialties 0907 medical, mental, dental, etc. 0907 work together because the CHP does not have all the necessary components at all the appropriate institutions. The CHP is not in compliance with the requirement of an integrated appointment system. Various services are available, but inmates do not have access to the services. The CHP cannot complete intake assessments due to insufficient staff and because AOC personnel transfer inmates prematurely. Overall compliance with the objectives for sick call, ambulatory services, admissions evaluations, and extra-institutional appointments fell from 68.9 percent in the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 65.2 percent in the 1996-1997 fiscal year.
145. The CHP has been losing ground over the past two years in its attempts to achieve compliance with the Medical and Mental Health Care Plans. Not only has compliance not been achieved, the situation is deteriorating and is characterized by what the CHCC described as "back sliding from a non compliance position." Even defendants' own expert concedes that inmates in the Puerto Rico prison system are provided with inadequate health care.
Intake Evaluations
146. The Correctional Health Program has never been able to complete 95% of intake evaluations.[17] The rate of completed intake evaluations, in fact, has fallen from 76.2% during the 1995-96 fiscal year to 68.4% during the 1996-1997 fiscal year. Intake evaluations are the cornerstone of correctional health services, because identifying inmates' health needs upon entry into the prison system allows health care staff to develop treatment plans for individuals with health needs and to control the spread of infectious diseases within the system. Thus, there are numerous inmates in the AOC system who have not received a complete medical or mental health evaluation. 184 This increases the risk of the spread of disease, and threatens the *184 health of inmates whose conditions require special care, but whose needs have not been identified. In addition to integration of health care services, an inmate tracking system is necessary so that a patient who requires follow-up or further care does not get lost in the process.
147. The AOC frequently transfers inmates out of intake facilities before these evaluations are completed. Thus, the opportunity to treat inmates with infectious diseases before they enter the general population is lost. In addition, inmates who may require a certain level of treatment may not receive that treatment at all, or else the treatment may be delayed. Because of the failure of AOC staff to send inmates' medical files along with the inmates upon transfer. All too frequently the only way that CHP staff become aware of the presence of an inmate in an institution is if the inmate puts in a sick-call slip or is brought to the emergency area.
148. The evaluation is important for the diagnosis of any acute or chronic medical or mental problem, which in turn can forestall potential exposure of others to communicable diseases that can be treated. In addition, the initial evaluation allows staff to determine the correct housing assignment for each inmate. A mental health assessment allows staff to detect inmates with mental conditions and to place them in an environment in which they would be able to function. To identify those people most at risk, the intake period is crucial, because inmates with mental conditions may be vulnerable and unable to protect themselves from other inmates. Inmates with

particular health needs must be housed in an institution that has facilities and personnel available for treating those needs.
149. The initial intake screening includes oral inquiry into current illnesses, medications, health problems and conditions and suicidal ideation; taking of vital signs including weight; observation for clinical abnormalities (e.g., behavior, appearance, injuries, deformities, and psychotic behavior); implantation of a skin test for tuberculosis (PPD); and documentation of the patient's disposition (referral to physician, to general population, or psychiatric team). Medical Care Plan at III.B.11.
150. The full health assessment includes review of intake screening results, expansion of the medical history, laboratory and diagnostic tests to detect communicable diseases, physical examination, and initiation of required treatment and examination. There are additional requirements addressing the special medical needs of women. Medical Care Plan at III.B.13.
151. Dr. Torres gave a practical description of how the admissions process works. When the inmate arrives at the admissions department, a doctor opens up a medical file and conducts a physical examination. He also conducts a pre-counseling session in which he advises the inmate to authorize an HIV test. On the order sheet, the doctor writes down the tests that he wants conducted. For example, he may want staff to conduct a CBC test, a urinalysis, a VDRL test, chest x-rays, and a tuberculin test. Doctors also conduct dental, mental health and health education screening. Finally, the inmate is given three appointments: one appointment for the reading of the tuberculin test, one appointment to discuss the results of the laboratory tests (two days after they are conducted), including the HIV test if applicable, and postcounseling. And one appointment for the following year for a new physical examination and pertinent lab tests.
152. Noncompliance with these admissions requirements is widespread. Compliance at the five regional intake centers with the requirement that the admissions process be completed within days fell from 76.1% in 1995-96 to 68.3% in 1996-97. At the State Penitentiary at Río Piedras, the rate was 59.6%; at Sabana Hoyos, it was 42.3%.
153. In some cases, failure to complete the admissions process timely simply means that it is completed later. Often, however, it is not completed at all, because the Administration of Correction transfers many patients away from the regional intake centers before the assessment is completed 0907 and in many cases, before the 7 days provided by the Medical Care Plan for the assessment. Medical Care Plan at § III.B.13. Such transfers violate the 185 Medical Care Plan, which requires *185 (at § III.B.14): "No individual shall be transferred from a regional intake facility until his intake health screening, initial history and full health assessment are completed unless the transfer is to another regional intake center."
154. AOC does not give notice before removing inmates from the intake centers, despite a 1992 court order requiring such notice. These transfers without records occur because AOC does not consult with Correctional Health personnel on all transfers, and when it does consult, it often does not give notice in time to produce the medical record. This practice violates a 1992 order that provides: "Defendants should develop immediately an agreement between the AOC and DOH to ensure that correctional staff notify medical staff of an inmate's impending transfer, so that medical staff can prepare the inmate's medical record for transfer." Order, December 28, 1992, at § XV.2 (Dkt.4166). Official policy states that CHP is to have 72 hours to review inmates' files and recommend for or against transfer, but the policy is not complied with. The CHCC has asked to be given 48 working hours for this purpose, but her request has not been honored.
155. Prisoners who are transferred to another intake center, but not to an intake building 0907 or even to another building in the same complex 0907 may still not receive their admission assessment and may not come to medical staff's attention until and unless they request sick call or a clinic appointment or arrive at the emergency room. Prisoners do not always do this, especially persons who are mentally ill. These prisoners are at particularly great risk of being lost in the system. Persons admitted Friday through Sunday, when certain laboratory services are not available, are particularly likely to be transferred before their assessments are completed.
156. At Ponce, about 66% of newly admitted inmates are removed before 7 days. Some 12% are bailed out, but most are transferred to other complexes or elsewhere in the Ponce complex. Only 33% are completed. If they are transferred within Ponce, medical staff try to find out where they are and complete the admissions process. In FY

1996-97 at Ponce, 3,604 inmates who were admitted were not evaluated. Of these, 2,044 (56.7%) were transferred before their assessment was completed, and 1,307 (36.3%) were released from prison. The remainder were hospitalized or transferred to other medical facilities.
157. A smaller fraction of Río Piedras prisoners are transferred before the seven days have elapsed. However, other causes have prevented compliance with the admissions requirement at Río Piedras. Compliance reached and exceeded 90% in 1995-96 but then dropped precipitously in 1996-97. The Medical Director cited insufficient medical staffing, high turnover among staff and the attendant disruption, the lack of custodial officers and transportation, shortages of x-ray films, the unavailability of laboratory services on weekends, and for a long time the availability of only one x-ray technician. The shortage of holding cells at the prison hospital, which are usually filled with patients for clinics, delays bringing admissions patients for required x-rays. Sabana Hoyos received a new x-ray machine two years ago for its intake center. However, the area where it was to be installed was never prepared. The machine was then brought to Río Piedras. If installed in the admissions area, it would expedite admissions processing by obviating the need to take prisoners to the hospital for x-rays. But the AOC, which controls the physical plant, has failed to complete the preparation of the Río Piedras site as well. In general, Dr. Guzmán described a situation in which the personal efforts of staff are defeated by the lack of a system.
158. At Sabana Hoyos, staff shortages have been so bad for the year before the hearing (and particularly the last three months) that the prison cannot arrange the necessary physician coverage to conduct admissions assessments.
159. At Bayamón, as of the hearing, admissions assessments were covered only because the doctors work enormous amounts of overtime, 70 to 80 hours a week in Dr. Torres' case and 90 hours or more in that of the 186 director of admissions. The AOC does not provide the medical staff with lists of new *186 admissions, and in some cases inmates are brought to the admissions area only after the seven days have already passed. Young adult inmates (ages 18-20) are transferred from the admissions area to other locations in the complex after no more than 24 hours.
160. At Ponce, problems in recruiting staff have obstructed completion of the admission process. The lack of sufficient escort officer to take prisoners to x-rays delays the process, and AOC uses admissions holding cells as overflow when the prison is overcrowded, which interferes with the medical staff's ability to work.
161. Failure to complete the admissions process poses significant risks to the health of plaintiff class members. [18] Persons with medical conditions requiring treatment may not be diagnosed and treated. Persons receiving medication for chronic conditions may have their medication interrupted, which in some cases may lead to the development of resistance to the medication. Mentally ill persons, if they are not evaluated on admission, may have decompensated by the time they come to the attention of mental health staff. The risk of suicide among prisoners is particularly great during the first 48 hours of incarceration. The presence of untreated mentally ill persons in the population presents risks both to those persons and to others in the prison population, since their disorders may render them either fragile and vulnerable or aggressive, and since their behavior may evoke hostility from other prisoners. Persons with communicable diseases may not be identified and treated, putting other prisoners as well as themselves at risk. The crowded prison environment presents a high risk of transmission of respiratory, skin and bloodborne infections and the correctional population is already a high-risk population for these diseases. Many prisoners requiring drug detoxification are transferred before this process is completed.
Sick Call
162. The Correctional Health Program never has been able to achieve 95% overall performance in sick-call appointments. The percentage of sick-call requests by inmates that resulted in patients being seen by medical staff in fiscal year 1996-97 exceeded 95% at four institutions (for purposes of statistic, each correctional complex counts as one institution); of the remaining 12 institutions, the rate dropped from the prior fiscal year.

163. The Medical Care Plan requires defendants to "establish a standardized system for the daily handling of non-emergency request for medical or dental care by inmates," ¶ III.C.16, and more generally "to create a system that guarantees accessibility to health care services for all inmates." ¶ II.7, objective (3).
164. Sick call is the gateway through which patients gain access to medical services. To attend sick call, a prisoner fills out a paper request and gives it to a nurse.
165. The percentage of sick call requests honored decreased from 81.3% in 1995-96 to 77.5% in 1996-97, with individual prisons having 1996-97 compliance rates as low as 64.3% (Bayamón), 74.4% (Sabana Hoyos), 69.1% (Ponce), 76.4% (Punta Lima), 78% (Mayagüez), and 68.7% (Fort Allen).
166. The reasons for noncompliance with the sick call requirement include both lack of correctional officers to escort prisoners, T44 (Dr. Torres, referring to 308 at Bayamón), and lack of physicians to conduct sick call. T165-66 (Dr. Ramos) (citing a shortfall of three or four M.D.'s at Ponce, and one recent month when the prison had no doctors to cover sick call; at present he has only one physician for sick call.)
187 167. The percentage of compliance with sick call requirements decreased from 81.3 *187 percent in the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 77.5 percent in the 1996-1997 fiscal year.
168. At Bayamón 308, sick call is not carried out on a regular basis because of the lack of officers.
169. Throughout the Río Piedras complex there is a medical area for sick call in each institution. The sick call area at the State Penitentiary is on the second floor, where there are also located the emergency room, the internal medicine clinics, the surgery clinics, X-rays, and the medical records department. Inmates being brought to the area for sick call are strip searched, which discourages inmates from attending sick call.
Medical Records: Failure to Transfer Records with Patients: Multiplicity of Records
170. The Medical Care Plan requires: "The complete medical record ... shall accompany all inmates being transferred from one institution to another for housing." V.D.64.g.
171. The AOC consistently transfers inmates without their medical records or without first consulting medical staff concerning transfers. During the 1996-1997 fiscal year, the Administration of Correction transferred approximately 6,394 inmates without transferring their medical records at the same time. When an inmate is transferred without the inmate's medical record, CHP personnel at the receiving institution may not be aware that the inmate has been placed in the institution, and, if they are aware of the inmate's presence, do not know the inmate's medical history or current medical condition. Thus, transfers without medical records can result in interruptions or delay in treatment. If health care staff are not consulted prior to an inmate's being transferred, this can result in inmates with chronic medical or mental health conditions being transferred to an institution that is not set up to offer the services needed by the inmate.
172. In 1966-97, in an inmate population of 11,610 there were 6394 transfers of inmates without medical records.
173. For example, at Ponce in FY 1996-97, 18.54% of inmates transferred into the facility arrived without medical records (1,098) inmates; 7.87% who were transferred out left without records (954 inmates). When an inmate is transferred without a medical record, a temporary record is created. In 1996-97, there were 9400 temporary medical records extant in the system.
174. These transfers without records occur because AOC does not consult with Correctional Health personnel on all transfers, and when it does consult, it often does not give notice in time to produce the medical record. This practice violates a 1992 order that provides: "Defendants should develop immediately an agreement between the AOC and DOH to ensure that correctional staff notify medical staff of an inmate's impending transfer, so that medical staff can prepare the inmate's medical record for transfer." Order, December 28, 1992, at § XV.2 (Dkt.4166). Official policy states that CHP is to have 72 hours to review inmates' files and recommend for or

against transfer, but the policy is not complied with. The CHCC has asked to be given 48 working hours for this purpose, but her request has not been honored.
175. Often medical personnel at the transferring prison learn of transfers only when a prisoner whose records are still at the prison fails to appear for an appointment or is not present to receive his unit dose medication. At the receiving prison, medical personnel may learn of the missing records only when the inmate requests services or appears with a medical emergency and no chart can be found.
176. Failure to transfer medical records when the prisoner is transferred is not consistent with the goal of an integrated medical care system.
177. This absence of medical records presents risks to patients that may be life-threatening in some cases, given the wide range of chronic conditions among the population. Patients receiving medications may not receive them timely, which in some cases may lead to relapses and even to development of resistance or to a "rebound" effect of the disease. They may also miss specialty appointments.
188 *188 178. CHP personnel make informal efforts to locate medical records by communication with CHP offices in the prison the patient was transferred from and notifying the medical records administrator at the central office. Even when this process works, it may take two weeks, and it does not correct all transfers without medical records. It is not a system.
179. One of the strengths of the CHP identified by the HCEC during the strategic evaluation in 1996 was that CHP records were legible and well-kept. Unfortunately, many inmates are transferred between institutions without their medical records. During fiscal year 1996-1997, 6,394 inmates were transferred from one AOC facility to another without their medical records. From July 1996 to July 1997, 18.5% of the transfers received at the Ponce Complex arrived without medical records, and 7% of the inmates transferred from the Ponce Complex to other institutions were sent without medical records. Transferring inmates without their medical records violates the principles of an integrated health system.
180. The failure to accompany inmates with their medical records results from not providing CHP sufficient notice of a pending transfer. This in turn results from the emphasis placed on overcrowding in the Morales Feliciano litigation. Inmates are moved constantly to avoid overcrowding, regardless of their condition or handicap.
181. One of the problems in transferring inmates without their medical records is that physicians at the receiving institution may not be able to easily confirm whether an inmate has been prescribed medication. If an inmate receiving medication is transferred without his or her medical record, the continuity of the delivery of the medication can be interrupted. For example, if inmates on triple therapy for HIV infection are transferred without records, and without an effective inmate tracking system, the CHP cannot follow patients from one institution to another; those patients will miss dosages and the efficacy of the medication will decrease. Disrupting the continuity of medications can ultimately lead to resistance to medication. Some medications, if stopped abruptly, cause a "rebound" phenomenon. A transfer without medical records also can result in a missed appointment for treatment or diagnostic intervention.
182. The absence of an inmate's medical record also has critical consequences because patients with emergent medical problems arrive at the emergency room with chronic diseases and mental conditions, yet emergency room personnel do not know of these conditions. In an emergency situation, a patient is exposed to a risk of harm to his health or even his life.
183. Transferring inmates without informing CHP staff means that inmates get "lost" in the system, because neither the CHP nor the AOC have an effective inmate tracking system. CHP staff can sometimes track inmates through the system by using pharmacy records. This informal system was developed internally by CHP staff. This informal system cannot correct all of the problems created by the failure to transfer medical records.
184. Some inmates have more than one medical record. An inmate may have more than one medical record if the inmate is admitted to one institution and then released, and later the same inmate is admitted through a different institution. Unless the inmate informs medical staff of the existence of the prior record, CHP staff may

not discover the prior record. The existence of multiple medical records is a potential source of confusion for CHP personnel.
185. When inmates are transferred without their medical records, staff at the receiving institution may not even be aware of the inmates' presence. CHP staff must periodically check AOC inmate movement records to determine if inmates have been received at an institution. Other times, CHP staff discover the presence of an inmate when the inmate shows up for sick call or seeks medical care through the emergency room, or else requests a clinic appointment. Once CHP staff have determined that an inmate is present without a medical file, they must attempt to locate the inmate's institution of origin through the AOC's records, and then request the original medical file. It 189 can take two *189 weeks to locate and obtain an inmate's medical file. At the sending institution, CHP personnel discover an inmate's absence only after an inmate misses an appointment for medical services or when medical personnel attempt to deliver unitary dosages and find that the patient no longer resides at the institution. While staff at the receiving institution attempt to locate and retrieve the original record, they must reconstruct the inmate's medical history and create a temporary file. This process creates an unconscionable number of temporary records.
186. Patients that are transferred from one institution to another without their medical file are supposed to pass through the medical area in admissions at the receiving institution. CHP staff then open a provisional file, which is used until the medical file arrives. This process creates a duplication of files and taxes the resources of nursing and medical staff. In July 1997, the AOC system had 9,400 temporary medical records.
Transfers Without Review by CHP
187. Court orders require that the AOC provide CHP staff with notice that an inmate will be transferred, so that the inmate can be transferred to an institution with appropriate medical facilities. The AOC does not consistently comply with these orders. CHP staff require at least 48 hours' notice that an inmate is to be transferred to review the inmate's record, assuming that they have access to the record, and make a recommendation concerning the institution to which the inmate can be transferred. The CHP's internal protocols establish an optimal period of 72 hours' notice to review the medical file and, depending on an inmate's medical and mental conditions, to approve or disapprove a transfer. This protocol is not consistently followed.
188. Transferring inmates without first allowing medical personnel to review the inmates' files can endanger the health of the inmate. For example, a number of inmates have been transferred to Camp Guavate with chronic medical conditions that cannot be adequately treated at that institution.
189. The AOC sometimes independently of the efforts of the medical staff, places chronically ill patients including patients with HIV, in facilities inappropriate to receive the medical treatment they require. They are transferred to a variety of facilities, camps, or smaller prison facilities, and the input of the medical staff is not utilized. If the transfer of inmates is done without medical input, the disease burden at a given facility will exceed the capability of the resources.
190. Patients with medical conditions requiring close supervision are being transferred to institutions, such as Guavate Camp, which lack a medical dormitory and the appropriate staff or resources to cater to their medical needs. These patients are transferred without their medical files.
191. Camp Guavate does not have mental health staff qualified to treat seriously mentally ill patients, thus those inmates should not be assigned to said penal institution since adequate medical treatment cannot be afforded. Patients suffering major depression, for example, should not be confined at Camp Guavate. Notwithstanding the above, a mentally ill inmate with a diagnosis of schizoaffective disorder was transferred to Camp Guavate without his medical file. His condition deteriorated the same day he was transferred and he had to be returned that same night to the Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit in Río Piedras for evaluation and treatment. Another inmate suffering from major depression was sent to Camp Guavate, without his medical file, posing a risk to his life, since failure to provide adequate mental treatment could have led to suicidal ideation.

192. A patient with a cardiac condition and a major depression history was transferred to Camp Guavate, which lacks the human and medical resources to treat and monitor his medical condition. This inmate takes Visteril and Cumadin-an anticoagulant-and should have blood tests performed regularly to avoid suffering an hemorrhage and a hypobulemic shock which could threaten his life. Because of his physical condition, the inmate should be assigned to a medical dormitory where he could be under close medical supervision. That supervision could not be provided at Camp Guavate.
190 193. Another inmate suffering thrombocytopenia, a blood disorder which could lead *190 to hemorrhages, was transferred to Camp Guavate in 1997. He should have been assigned to a medical dormitory. An inmate suffering from uncontrolled juvenile diabetes also was transferred to Camp Guavate. He too should have been placed in a medical dormitory, where his condition could be closely monitored.
194. The CHP is not in substantial compliance with the requirement of performing an admissions assessment; in fact, the CHP never has achieved the 95% completion goal. The percentage of completion of intake health evaluations dropped from 76.1 percent in the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 68.3 percent in the 1996-1997 fiscal year. The primary reason is that inmates are transferred by the AOC before the admission process can be completed. This is in spite of initial signs of improvement shown in 1994 and 1995. The rate of non-compliance with the admission assessment requirements also results from difficulties in hiring necessary personnel and from inmates being removed from intake institutions prior to the completion of their health assessment. In fiscal year 1996-1997, 5,967 inmates were transferred out of intake centers before seven days following their admission. In other instances, some institutions do not have the equipment necessary in order to complete intake evaluations.
195. Between early transfers and early releases, approximately 11,400 out of approximately 28,000 admissions do not complete the admissions evaluation, even though the CHP has begun to invest time and money in performing evaluations of those prisoners. The failure to complete intake assessments has a negative effect on the CHP's attempts to control infections disease. Some inmates could have chronic medical diseases or present symptoms of withdrawal from drugs or alcohol; they can represent a danger to the population and to themselves if not tracked and treated properly.
196. In the Ponce Complex, during the last three years, only 33% of inmates admitted to the institution receive a complete intake evaluation. The remaining 66% are either transferred by the AOC or released on bail before the intake evaluation can be completed. Similarly low percentages prevail at the Bayamón Complex, where the current rate of completion is approximately 50%. There were three months during 1996 at which the completion rate was 0% because of the lack of medical staff to perform intake examinations. Most admissions occur at night. If a physician is not available to cover a night shift, the admission process cannot be completed.
197. The most frequent way in which CHP staff discover an inmate who has been transferred without a complete intake evaluation is when the inmate shows up for sick call or seeks medical care through the emergency room, or requests a clinic appointment. But not all inmates request sick call or other medical care shortly after their admission. Mentally ill patients report to medical areas less frequently than do other inmates. Thus, mentally ill patients are at a particular risk of being lost in the system if they are not given an initial intake evaluation. If an inmate requires mental health treatment but does not receive it, a number of problems can result: the inmate can be very vulnerable to physical abuse by other inmates; the inmate can cause problems for the general population and staff, because the inmate can become disruptive; the inmate diverts attention by prison staff, so that they cannot deal with other problems; failure to treat also causes a great deal of pain for the mentally ill inmate; the inmate can also can be at risk of harming him or herself.
198. The completion of intake evaluations at Río Piedras in July 1995 was only 30.6%; this was increased to 90% in 1996. The rate fell dramatically, however, after May 1996 to approximately 5%. This decrease results in part from a shortage of physicians. This decrease also results from the lack of custodial officers and the lack of transportation to take patients to the hospital across the courtyard to have X-rays taken. Moreover, there are no laboratory services available during the weekend. A backlog of inmates awaiting lab test results, and when lab services are available again on Monday mornings, there are not enough officers to bring the inmates to the medical area. The failures in the admission process at Río Piedras affect the health of persons admitted to the 191 complex. *191 The delay in the diagnosis of infectious conditions, chronic mental conditions, and withdrawal

symptoms causes the interruption of treatment until admissions staff are able to identify the medical conditions of each patient.
199. The Bayamón Correctional Complex, also lacks physicians to conduct all the admissions evaluations. CHP personnel attempt to deal with this shortage of physicians by assigning doctors to night watch for several days each week. Some physicians, therefore, work 80-hour weeks. As a result of these conditions, the morale of the physicians is being affected, to a point that some are threatening to resign. The AOC sometimes transfers inmates undergoing withdrawal from the admission area to other areas in Bayamón or to other institutions. Frequently, inmates that arrive from the street are placed in the general population before a medical and mental history examination is performed and chest X-rays and labs are taken. This has medical consequences in the general population because a patient could be carrying a communicable disease.
200. CHP staff at the Sabana Hoyos Correctional Institution report that the facility has the lowest compliance of correctional facilities in Puerto Rico in completing intake evaluations. The CHP is practically in total noncompliance with the Plans at the Sabana Hoyos Correctional Institution. The CHCC, over the past four years, has been told a number of times that admissions in the western region of the island will be changed to Guerrero, only to be told on a number of occasions that this plan has changed. This has hampered the development of admission health services at Sabana Hoyos because, if admissions are to be moved to another facility, it does not make sense to devote resources to developing a full complement of admissions services at Sabana Hoyos. Nevertheless, the change to another facility has never been implemented by the AOC.
201. Approximately two years ago, the CHP successfully tested the entire prison population for tuberculosis. At the end of these tests, CHP staff knew who in the AOC system was potentially at risk of developing active TB. This is no longer true because failure to complete intake assessments has made it impossible to determine accurately the number of PPD positive inmates in the system.
Failure to Select Medically Safe Housing
202. Generally, there is no system by which the defendants take into account prisoners' medical condition in making housing placements. Although CHP reviews medical records and makes recommendations concerning proposed transfers to private prisons, there is no such procedure for AOC facilities. Official policy states that CHP is to have 72 hours to review inmates' files and recommend for or against transfer, but this policy is not complied with, and the CHCC's requests for 48 hours for this purpose have not been heeded.
203. In practice, the regional intake centers are the locations that best comply with requirements for chronic patients. The defendants do not concentrate persons with chronic disorders in the regional intake centers. Rather, they disperse many of them to facilities such as camps which do not provide adequate care for such patients and are remote from emergency services. This failure to place chronic patients in facilities with an appropriate level of care is inconsistent with the goal of an integrated system.
Transportation of Inmates to Emergency Facilities
204. Many inmates who are brought to medical facilities requiring emergency services must be taken to outside emergency facilities, and for the last six years there have been delays in transportation either from one prison in a complex to another to reach the emergency facilities, or from the prison to an outside hospital. There are problems related to the transfer of inmate patients between services to the various facilities complexes and the regional secondary facility because of either the unavailability of a working emergency vehicle and/or the lack of correctional officers. Delays of up to four hours were reported. The standard of care to prevent morbidity is a fifteen to twenty minute wait for an ambulance. Increased morbidity, deterioration of conditions, increased 192 symptoms *192 such as pain and suffering are all caused by delays in transporting an inmate to an emergency room.

205. Records show that within the last twelve months, 15 deaths occurred and the record also indicates that inmates are brought to the medical unit by other inmates, which reflects a system completely dependent upon inmates, which can only result in unnecessary deaths.
206. On Saturday, August 2, 1997, during a visit of representatives of the AOC and Dr. John H. Clark, defendants' correctional health expert, to the Bayamón Correctional Complex, an inmate suffered a head injury. This patient was taken to the emergency ward, but due to the neurological changes he was presenting he needed to be transferred to the Medical Center emergency room in Río Piedras to have a CT scan. At that moment there was an ambulance at the emergency area, but there was no officer who could start or drive the ambulance. This delay in transportation to emergency rooms is a common experience if emergencies occur after 4:00 p.m. at the complex. The patient arrived at the Bayamón 1072 emergency ward around 2:00 in the afternoon, and it wasn't until 6:00 p.m. that he was finally transferred to the Medical Center. This patient should not have been more than 15 or 20 minutes in the emergency room waiting to be taken to the hospital. This unacceptable delay in transferring the patient to the emergency room exposed him to a risk of harm or even death.
207. An inmate at Bayamón who suffered left chest trauma presenting a diminished lung sound, pallor and tachycardia was transferred to an outside emergency room almost two hours after the referral to the hospital. This type of delay is not medically acceptable. The delay posed a serious risk to this patient's health, who had a rupture to the spleen which had to be removed. Another inmate at Bayamón with a history of arterial hypertension, congestive heart failure, bronchial asthma and insulin dependence, diabetes mellitus and a history of coagulopathy, who arrived at the prison's emergency room with rectal bleeding, was transferred to the outside emergency room almost 5 hours after being referred to the hospital. That delay was medically unacceptable. He should have been transferred within 15 to 20 minutes. Also medically unacceptable was a 24 hour delay in transferring an inmate who suffered a fracture of the left hand with a degree of deformity. There was also a 24 hour delay in the case of an inmate suffering a fractured finger. Like the other inmate, he could have developed a deformity and subsequent medical treatment would have been more profound. Another inmate suffering persistent seizures was transferred to a hospital six hours after being referred. This is medically unacceptable and posed a risk to his health for he could have suffered cerebral damage.
208. Emergency transfers between modules inside the institution, and between institutions at the same complex, are also characterized by unacceptable delays. The transfer of an inmate suffering a left and right eye trauma took approximately two hours. The delay could have led to problems with his eyesight. Another example is that of an inmate suffering of trauma to his head and left costal area whose transfer took over two hours. Similarly, there is undisputed evidence on the record of two other inmates suffering head trauma and multiple trauma whose transfer from one module to another inside the institution took approximately two hours. The delay posed a threat to their health.
Off-Site Appointments and Subspecialty Clinics
209. Although completion of extra-institutional appointments rose from 60.8% in the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 61.8% in the 1996-1997 fiscal year, that rate of performance is still unacceptable. In addition, 69% of individual correctional institutions suffered a decrease in performance with respect to extra-institutional appointments in the 1996-1997 fiscal year.
210. The Correctional Health Program never has been able to achieve 95% completion in the area of off-site appointments. These appointments are necessary to provide specialized health procedures 0907 such as computerized tomography scans and major surgery 0907 that cannot be provided at the institutional level within AOC 193 facilities. During the *193 1995-1996 fiscal year, 41.5% of off-site appointments were missed. During the 1996-1997 fiscal year, 38.2% of appointments were missed. The rate of completion of off-site appointments dropped at 11 of 16 institutions from the 1995-96 to the 1996-97 fiscal years (for purposes of this statistic, a correctional complex counts as one institution): the rate did not exceed 81% at any institution, and at most institutions, was below 75%.

211. The program does have an internal process for obtaining and scheduling extra institutional medical appointments, which is somewhat effective. The problem in getting inmates to their medical appointments inside or outside of prison is the result of inefficient custodial escorts. In addition, first priority is given to transporting inmates to court, and the shortage of vehicles results in inmates' not being taken to outside medical appointments. Even if a vehicle is available, there may not be an escort or, if an escort is available, there may not be a vehicle.
212. Under the CHP's internal procedures, a contact at the Río Piedras Medical Center obtains the appointments and faxes them to the CHP's central office, from which point notice of the appointments is communicated to the prisons. Correctional Health staff then notify AOC personnel of the appointment two or three days beforehand. The AOC has never complained to the Chief Health Care Coordinator that it does not receive sufficient notice of inmates' off-site medical appointments.
213. Even when Defendants took direct steps to resolve the problems in taking inmates to offsite appointments, the AOC has not been able to carry through with those efforts. For example, pursuant to a security stipulation, the Chief Health Care Coordinator designated the Río Piedras State Penitentiary as a priority institution, met with officers at that institution, and designed a plan for providing medical escorts. The escorts were assigned for two or three weeks, but suddenly the officers were removed from medical escort duty.
214. Delays in obtaining appointments in off-site subspecialty clinics threatens the continuity of a patient's medical care. At the Río Piedras complex, for example, it can take seven months to get an orthopedic clinic appointment, and if the patient misses the appointment for lack of a vehicle or custodial officer, it can take another six months to obtain another appointment. Extra institutional appointments are delayed and canceled and in some cases inmates may wait months to schedule an appointment. If the appointment gets canceled, it can take a year for the visit to finally take place. These delays are unacceptable and pose a risk to the health and safety of inmates, prolonging unnecessary pain and discomfort. The delays can also cause conditions to deteriorate to a point where they are no longer treatable.
215. At the Ponce Complex, inmates who require subspecialty medical attention are referred to the Ponce Regional Hospital. If that hospital does not offer the necessary specialty, a referral is made to the Puerto Rico Medical Center. The Ponce Complex, however, has serious problems with extra institutional appointments. The Ponce Correctional Complex is not providing inmates transportation to off-site appointments. This problem affects the follow-up of the patient in the outside institution that usually has arranged for a specialist or for a special study. Also, this problem affects compliance with the Plans, because Correctional Health personnel cannot complete the evaluation or treatment of the patient.
216. There is a significant problem with transporting inmates to off-site appointments and in getting timely off-site appointments at the Río Piedras Complex. The Bayamón Complex also suffers from a lack of dependable vehicles and a lack of escort and transportation staff to take inmates to off-site medical facilities.
217. In addition to depriving inmates of health care, the inability of the AOC to get inmates to medical appointments results in wasted resources. The Plans provide that if the delay in getting inmates to outside clinics is more than four weeks following a referral, efforts should be made to provide subspecialty clinics on-site at the prisons. The Chief Health Care Coordinator has attempted to reduce reliance on extra institutional appointments 194 by bringing subspecialists into some of *194 the prisons. CHP staff found a number of specialists willing to offer clinics in some prisons, but the program could not contract with those specialists for two reasons: first, they wanted to be paid for each clinic they attended, but the program did not have the administrative mechanisms to hire on those terms; second, there is insufficient space at the institutions to hold the clinics.
Ambulatory Services
218. The Correctional Health Program never has been able to achieve 95% delivery of ambulatory medical services. Ambulatory medical services are general outpatient medical services. The rate of provision of ambulatory medical services fell from 59.6% during the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 57% during the 1996-1997 fiscal

year. The highest rates for ambulatory medical services at individual institutions were 94.9% at Stop 8 (an institution with a capacity of 59 inmates) and 99.7 percent at Camp La Pica (an institution with a capacity of 160 inmates). At the remaining AOC institutions (with a total capacity in excess of 12,000 to 14,000 inmates), no institution achieved a rate higher than 74%.
219. Performance in completing ambulatory services dropped from 59.7% in the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 57% in the 1996-1997 fiscal year. Overall compliance with objectives for sick call, ambulatory services, admissions evaluations, and extra institutional appointments fell from 68.9% in the 1995-1996 fiscal year to 65.2% in the 1996-1997 fiscal year. This reduction was echoed at both the Río Piedras State Penitentiary and the Mayaguez Western Detention Center. In addition, at the Ponce complex, mental health ambulatory services and mental health patients are not fully served in terms of their monthly evaluations and their regular medications.
220. The problems experienced by the CHP with respect to ambulatory and extra-institutional medical appointments have a greater effect on persons with chronic conditions.
HIV + and AIDS (Triple Therapy); Hepatitis C; Tuberculosis
221. The Program does not provide the current modality of standard medical treatment indicated for HIV and AIDS patients. The treatment termed "triple therapy" is the standard of treatment for many HIV patients. Failure to provide the treatment to those for whom it is indicated increases the likelihood of morbidity and mortality.[19] Approximately 60-70% of HIV or AIDS patients in the AOC system would benefit from triple therapy if it were properly administered. In order to start and properly administer triple therapy for HIV or AIDS patients, three elements are necessary: higher rate of compliance with medication administration, additional staff, and an adequate budget to purchase the drugs and perform testing. Part of the reason for the failure to provide triple therapy is the budgetary constraints suffered by the CHP. Initial and periodic viral load tests, in addition to other types of tests, are necessary, and these all carry their own economic costs.
222. As an initial evaluation of a candidate for triple therapy, the patient's history must be taken, a physical examination made, viral load, CT4 and CT8 analyses performed; CBC measured, and SMA20, a VDRL, a hepatitis profile, and a chest X-ray made.
223. The most important factor to assess in evaluating a candidate for triple therapy is currently the viral load. If an HIV patient does not have any liver or renal disease, the patient should be given triple therapy. It is important to begin the therapy as early as possible to decrease the viral load and maintain the CT4 count (once decreased, the CT4 count does not recover, and the only way to preserve the CT4 count is to decrease the viral load).
224. "Triple therapy" for HIV + consists of the administration of a combination of antiviral medications. If triple therapy doses are not administered correctly, a patient's HIV infection can develop resistance to the medications 195 included in triple therapy. "Resistance" *195 occurs when an organism develops a mutation that makes it immune to or less affected by a drug. Triple therapy represents a substantial advance in the treatment of people with HIV because it decreases mortality, decreases opportunistic infections, decreases hospital admission rates, decreases viral loads, improves the immune system, and improves the quality of life for HIV patients.
225. To avoid the development of drug resistance by HIV, it is necessary to prescribe more than one medication. Also, the patient must take some medications at strictly prescribed times throughout the day, and cannot miss doses. This requires commitment by the patient, as well as resources by the health provider. For example, some of the HIV medications must be refrigerated.
226. In order for triple therapy medication to be effective, the patient must take at least 90% of the prescribed doses; if less than 90% is taken, the effectiveness will decrease; if less than 60% are taken, the medication has no effect. When unit dosage delivery of triple therapy falls below 90%, CT4 counts will decrease and infections and mortality will increase. As inmates on triple therapy are transferred without records, and without an effective inmate tracking system, the CHP cannot follow patients from one institution to another. Those patients will miss dosages and the efficacy of the medication will decrease.

227. In addition to applying the medications in triple therapy to HIV patients, it is necessary to monitor CT4 counts and viral loads. Patients have to be followed very closely, especially during the first three months of treatment, because of the possible side effects of the medication. The effect of delays on initiation of treatment with triple therapy in AOC institutions will be a higher mortality rate 0907 i.e., patients die sooner than those whose treatment begins earlier 0907 and higher rates of opportunistic infections. As a consequence, hospital admissions will increase. On the other hand, early intervention will reduce mortality and the incidence of opportunistic infections. The delay in treatment with triple therapy also can result in increased spread of opportunistic infections among the population to inmates with HIV. There also are some diseases, such as tuberculosis, that can spread to people who are not infected with HIV.
228. Hepatitis C also poses a problem in the inmate population. To adequately treat the disease, which is spread by blood contact, it is necessary to spot it as soon as possible. Treatment requires 12 to 18 months of treatment with Interferon. Hepatitis C can lead to carcinoma or cirrhosis of the liver. There is a high prevalence of hepatitis C among the inmate population. The interferon treatment is administered once a day, seven days a week, by injection, which must be administered by a nurse.
229. The procedure for administering HIV test to inmates in the AOC system is to provide them with counseling upon admission to prison, and to ask if they want to be tested.
230. The medication for tuberculosis is applied twice a week. If this frequency is interrupted, the efficacy of the medication will decrease.
231. The lack of an inmate tracking system and the transfer of inmates without medical records also makes it difficult to effectively apply triple therapy, because the CHP cannot follow patients from one institution to another. Those patients would miss dosages and the efficacy of the medication will decrease.
232. Discontinuity in triple therapy treatment can result in a "rebound" effect, in which the HIV virus begins to reproduce much more actively, and to become drug resistant.
233. The procedure for administering HIV test to inmates in the AOC system is to provide them with counseling upon admission to prison, and to ask if they want to be tested. Some inmates refuse to be tested for HIV, however; the reasons for this refusal vary. Some inmates do not want to accept that they are in a high risk group, some already know they are infected, some think they may be infected but do not want to face it, and some patients simply do not want to receive treatment.
196 *196 Medication and Unit Dosages
234. Nor has the Program ever been able to achieve 95% successful delivery of unitary dosages of medicine. "Unitary dosages" refers to the administration of individual doses of medication to an inmate with a contagious, deadly, long term or acute condition, directly by health care staff. In certain cases, this is necessary to ensure that an inmate actually takes the medication at the prescribed time. For example, one type of medication to combat HIV must be taken every eight hours to be effective. This means not just three times a day, but actually at the end of every eight-hour period. Failure to adhere to this rigid schedule can render the medication ineffective at best. At worst, it can promote the development of drug resistant strains of HIV.
235. In the system as a whole, the percentage of unit doses actually dispensed decreased from 86.4% in 1995-96 to 85.5% in 1996-97. Individual prisons had 1996-97 compliance levels as low as 84.7% (Sabana Hoyos), 77% (Ponce) 2.3% (Zarzal), and 77.6% (Fort Allen). Exhibit 560. These compliance percentages translate into huge numbers of medication doses returned and not dispensed: 180,761 in 1995-96 and 194,406 in 1996-97.
236. These levels of noncompliance pose serious risks to patients. Patients on psychotropic medication whose mental illnesses is controlled may relapse into an acute phase. Patients taking medications for epilepsy who miss them for three days may revert to chronic/acute phases and have convulsions. Patients on cardiac medication can suffer mild cardiac arrest or can die. The failure to provide medications as prescribed for infectious diseases

such as tuberculosis, HIV and hepatitis C may not only constitute ineffective treatment but also may result in the medications becoming ineffective through the development of resistance. Triple therapy for HIV requires a 90% compliance rate to be effective.
237. The issue of returned unit doses has been discussed with nursing staff, taken to executive committee meetings with AOC staff, discussed with area superintendents and with prison superintendents, as well as with the Chief Health Care Coordinator.
238. The failure to complete unit dosages results from a number of factors. Nurses that administer unitary dosages to patients must be accompanied by a custodial officer. Because officers are not available, however, the nurses often cannot take the medications to the housing units. Transferring inmates without their medical records can interrupt the continuity of medication as well, because staff at the receiving institution do not know what diseases or medications are being taken by the inmate who is transferred. Currently, if inmates receiving unit doses are transferred from one institution to another, the nursing staff at the first institution, upon discovering that the inmate was transferred, contacts the infection control nurse, who attempts to locate the inmate at the institution to which the inmate was transferred.
239. The failure to provide unitary dosages to mental health patients results in those patients' relapsing into acute conditions. When this happens, the entire cycle of medication must be started over again, or the patient must be sent to the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital or to the PICU.
Physical Therapy
240. For a course of physical therapy to commence, there must be a prescription from a physiatrist or an orthopedist. The delay in commencement of a course of physical therapy can perpetuate neurological damage and incapacitate the patient. At the Río Piedras complex, it can take seven months to get an orthopedic clinic appointment, and if the patient misses the appointment for lack of a vehicle, or of a custodial officer, it can take another six months to get a second appointment.
241. The physical therapy area at the Río Piedras Complex has the minimal equipment necessary to provide physical therapy services. But frequently, inmates who are scheduled for therapy do not make their appointments because they are not brought to the facility. Although the physical therapy services provided to inmates who have access to them are adequate, there is only one physical therapy facility in the entire AOC system.
197 *197 Diets
242. The AOC does not provide inmates with special medical diets. This has been and continues to be a significant problem. There is nothing resembling a professionally acceptable medical diet program in the Puerto Rico correctional system. The CHP's responsibility with respect to medical diets is fairly limited; it is the AOC's responsibility to actually provide diets to inmates. Because of shortages of funds, the CHP can obtain special nutritional supplements for only the most seriously ill patients. The failure to provide an appropriate diet results in a number of dangers to inmates: chronic illnesses can rapidly deteriorate, diabetics can suffer cardiovascular and neurological damage; people with high blood pressure can suffer damage to blood vessels, the kidneys, brain, heart, and run the risk of stroke.
Mental Health Services
243. Psychiatric and mental health services have suffered in particular. Psychiatric staff were able to provide treatment to only 25% of the inmates in the AOC system who require such treatment during the 1996-1997 fiscal year.
244. In the system as a whole, approximately 698 of inmates require some form of treatment for mental health conditions who are not receiving that treatment. Of these, 121 inmates require intermediate care, 464 require ambulatory care, an indeterminate number require hospitalization, and others require some other form of care.

"Ambulatory" mental health services are those that can be provided on an outpatient basis. "Intermediate" mental health care requires placement in a specialized unit for mental health patients who require more intensive therapy for prolonged periods of time. Hospitalization is required for patients suffering acute psychosis. Currently, there are not enough intermediate care beds available for the inmates who require such care. The CHP also does not have sufficient psychiatric hospitalization beds for the inmates who require such services.
245. About 30% of the inmate population requires mental health services of some sort (excluding addictive disorders) according to the estimates that underlie the Mental Health Staffing Plan. Based on need, the CHP has estimated that its mental health staff reaches about one-fourth of those persons who need care.
246. The need for mental health services has increased since the Mental Health Staffing Plan was adopted. Since then the AOC population has grown substantially, and in recent years there has been a significant increase in the number of acutely mentally ill patients requiring immediate hospitalization upon their admission to prison. T1068-69 (Dr. A.Guzmán); T896-97 (Dr. A.Guzmán) (citing 423 acute psychiatric patients, newly sentenced or pretrial detainees, received from court at Río Piedras in FY 1996-97, increased from 260 the year before; noting that the problem extends beyond Río Piedras); Plaintiffs' Exhibit 526 (showing that in FY 1996-97, of 549 person from the Río Piedras admissions area evaluated at the PICU in Río Piedras, 174 required admission to that unit).
247. Because of concerns about untreated mental illness, the CHP in mid-1997 initiated an "outreach" effort in which mental health staff were taken away from their regular duties and sent into the prison population to look for mentally ill persons. This effort has to date been carried out at the Ponce complex, Vega Alta, and the State Penitentiary at Río Piedras. At these facilities, staff identified some 23 inmates who required intermediate mental health care, 88 who required ambulatory treatment, and 17 who required hospitalization. T884-85, 1071, 72 (Dr. A.Guzmán); Exhibit 559; see T317 (Dr. R. Guzmán) (describing outreach findings at Río Piedras).
248. Based on these results, the CHP has estimated that extending the outreach program to the entire system would yield 121 persons requiring intermediate care, 464 requiring ambulatory care, and 89 requiring hospitalization.
249. Defendants have not been able to provide the appropriate treatment for those persons with serious mental health needs discovered in the outreach to date. Of 17 inmates who require immediate hospitalization, only 6 198 have been hospitalized because *198 the defendants, citing lack of security staff, have permitted Dr. Guzmán to open only one of the wards in the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital. The remaining patients have been waiting two to three months for hospitalization. Ordinarily, patients who are identified as needing hospitalization must be admitted immediately. Some of these patients have been repeatedly referred to the Psychiatric Intensive Care Units when they decompensated. At times there have been as many as 20 patients competing for the 14 beds in the Río Piedras PICU, with the overflow being held in the hallways.
250. No date has been set for opening the additional wards to provide room for these patients (or the dozens of other persons needing hospitalization that will likely be discovered when the outreach effort continues). The psychiatric hospital was to have been opened by July 1, 1993. Mental Health Plan at ¶ II.D.16. The partial opening took place on August 1, 1996.
251. The prison system's mental health staff is far lower than the levels required by the Mental Health Staffing Plan, and the shortfall has worsened rather than improved. Recruitment of mental health staff, especially psychiatrists, is difficult because they are concentrated in metropolitan areas and because the program has great difficulty competing with the private sector, the health reform, and ANSCA, the new addition agency. Salaries are unattractive and persons working on contract receive no fringe benefits.
252. Of a required total of 177.32 full time equivalents mental health staff, the number actually employed reached a total of 94.54 in 1996 but has fallen to 80.6 in 1997.
253. The greatest shortfalls are in psychiatrist and psychologists. Of 35.89 psychiatrists required, the number employed reached a peak of 12.79 in 1995 and fell to 9.9 in 1997. Of 90.14 psychologists required, the program employed 37.27 in 1996, and in 1997 employed 30.8.

254. These shortfalls are further broken down for each professional category among ambulatory, intermediate and admissions services in Exhibits 571-579; T878-80 (Dr. A.Guzmán). In no instance does the number employed in 1997 equal the number required, and in every instance the 1997 figure represents a decline from the previous year. At the hearing, Dr. Guzmán testified that since Exhibit 570 was prepared, the program has lost another three psychiatrists.
255. At Ponce, the psychiatric staff is inadequate, with only one psychiatric assigned to ambulatory services and referrals from admissions and another assigned to the intermediate units. Dr. Ramos testified, "Yes, we don't fully serve the mental health patients, specially in terms of their evaluation month by month and also the medication that has to be served to them."
256. At Río Piedras, Dr. Rafael Guzmán linked inadequate mental health staffing to the failure to evaluate patients and to adjust their medication properly, resulting in deterioration in their mental condition, as demonstrated by the results of the mental health outreach effort. He added that "we are usually brought the patients who have disciplinary problems bu the patient who is depressed, who is isolated, who is not bothering anybody, that patient is not making it to us and we are not making it to them."
257. Untreated mental illness in a prison setting presents risks both to the mentally ill and to those around them in the prison population, since their disorders may render them either fragile and vulnerable or aggressive. There may be physical abuse of the vulnerable mentally ill prisoner by other inmates because their behavior is unruly and their presence is obnoxious. They create management problems for the staff in housing units. Mental illness itself is a catastrophic illness that is extremely painful for the person experiencing it. Some mentally ill persons are at risk of suicide if not treated.
258. Some untreated mental illness results from prisoners' being transferred out of admissions areas before their assessments are completed. In some such cases, the Correctional Health staff are first notified of the patient when he has decompensated.
259. The risks of inadequate mental health staff are illustrated by the case of the patient admitted to Ponce for a 199 motor vehicle *199 violation, with a history of mental health problems and in a state of drug withdrawal, at a time
when there was no psychologist on duty; he committed suicide the next day.
260. The number of suicides in the AOC population has varied from 8 to 11 during the last four fiscal years. This appears to be a high suicide rate. Dr. Shansky testified that in Illinois, there were two or three suicides a year in a population that varied from 25,000 to 30,000. In the District of Columbia, there was previously a high rate (8 or 9 in a population of 1700), but it has been reduced to one suicide in the two years he has been receiver.
261. Defendants' mental health program is deficient in facilities or operations in a number of other respects.
262. Correctional Regional Mental Health Units (CRMHU) are to be established at the regional intake centers. Mental Health Plan at ¶ I.3. Each CRMHU is to maintain a Psychiatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU). There should be 25 beds. In fact, there are only 20 beds in three PICUS: 14 beds at Río Piedras, 4 at Vega Alta and 2 at Ponce. Sabana Hoyos and Bayamón do not have PICU units. Nor have there been PICU beds at Mayagüez, though it was initially designated an intake center.
263. The number of PICU beds in completely inadequate. However, because of the loss of medical dormitory beds because of remodeling, construction defects, and AOC crowding and security demands, the Chief Health Care Coordinator has proposed utilizing one of the presently closed wards of the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital as a PICU and devoting the existing PICU beds to use as medical dormitories in light of the major loss of medical dorm beds to remodeling and AOC crowding and security demands. No action has been taken on this proposal.
264. The Mental Health Plan requires each CRMHU to maintain a psychosocial unit for persons needing intermediate mental health care, i.e., chronic mentally ill persons who do not require hospitalization but must be separated from the general population. Mental Health Plan at ¶ II.C.12. These are patients who inter ali must be taught daily living skills, the use of medication, and he to recognize their symptoms and ask for help.

265. While these intermediate units exist, except at Sabana Hoyos, they are not operated consistently with their purpose. In the Río Piedras 504 building, there is a Psychosocial Intermediate Area with two living modules of 24 cells each. However, it is located far from the medical staff and there is no nursing staff in the area. Correctional Health staff must rely on custodial staff to give them access, and sometimes custodial staff are not available, resulting in limitation of services to this vulnerable population. This lack of security coverage is detrimental to the population, since they have chronic psychiatric disorders and need constant supervision to perform the tasks of everyday living. T285-87 (Dr. R. Guzmán); see Plaintiffs' Exhibit 524 (letter from mental health staff to AOC security supervisor, noting dangers of lack of security coverage including other inmates' coming into the unit and selling razors to the mental health patients, some of whom cut themselves with razors). There is also no running water in this unit.
266. Similarly, at Bayamón, the intermediate psychosocial unit, Dorm 5C, lacks adequate correctional staff to supervise the unit, resulting in inability of nurses and other personnel to visit the unit to do their work. Dr. Torres testified that routinely on weekend nights, he would encounter the nurse assigned to the intermediate unit in the medical area rather than at her post because lack of custodial staff meant that she could not get to the unit. As a result, the patients cannot get their medication, most of which is unit doses. This lack of supervision poses risks to the patients' health and safety. Without supervision, there are fights, and there has been sodomy in a population that includes persons with HIV infection. If these patients, whose mental conditions have been stabilized, do not receive their medication as prescribed, they may revert to an acute state. Some of these patients have suicidal ideation. Dr. Torres cited the example of a patient who got out of the unit onto the roof, threatened suicide, and cut himself on barbed wire. This is the kind of behavior that interruption of medication may cause.
200 *200 267. At Ponce, there is an intermediate psychiatric area for young adults, the only one in the system. The staffing of this unit is inadequate, resulting in harm to the patients and frustration to the staff.
268. In some instances AOC has placed prisoners in intermediate psychiatric areas who do not meet the criteria for placement in them. These areas are carried on the AOC census as if they were general population housing areas.
269. One psychiatric population for whom no provision at all is made is a group, now numbering 26, of persons with severe antisocial personality disorder. These prisoners have long histories of criminal activity and have brief psychotic episodes and depressive episodes with suicidal conduct and acts of self-mutilation. They are not appropriately housed in a psychiatric hospital or an intermediate care unit because their behavior is abusive to other people and disruptive to an intermediate program. They require a secure unit with a solid mental health component and appropriately trained security staff. Dr. Guzmán's requests to successive AOC administrators concerning this population have gone unanswered, except for the present administrator's suggestion that she set up a committee.
270. The CHP cannot provide mental health services to the population that requires such services. During the fiscal year 1996-1997, CHP psychiatrists saw only 6.7% of the inmate population, compared to an estimated 27.2% of the population who require psychiatric services. Thus, CHP psychiatrists saw only 25% of the target population. In real numbers, this means that CHP psychiatrists were able to see only approximately 775 inmates out of an estimated 3,158 who needed psychiatric services. Much of the failure to treat mental health illness in the system results from shortages in mental health staff. The demand for mental health staff has increased within the AOC since 1993, in part because of an increase in the inmate population, but also because of an increase in the number of acute psychiatric cases being admitted from the free community.
271. Out of approximately 177 full time mental health staff required by the CHP in 1993, the program had only 52.5. That number increased to approximately 94.5 by 1996, but fell again during 1997 to 80.6. Out of approximately 51 full time social workers required by the CHP in 1993, the program had only 20.6. This number rose to approximately 45 in 1996, but fell again to approximately 40 in 1997. Out of approximately 90 full time psychology staff required by the CHP in 1993, the program had only 22.27. This number rose to 37.27 in 1996, but fell again in 1997 to 30.8. Out of approximately 35.9 full time psychiatric staff required by the CHP in 1993, the program had only 9.63. This number rose to 12.79 in 1995, but had fallen to below 9.9 by 1997. Out of

approximately 134.5 full time ambulatory mental health services staff required by the CHP in 1993, the program had only approximately 32. This number rose to 65.72 in 1996, but had fallen to approximately 58 in 1997. Out of approximately 36 full time social workers required for the ambulatory mental health services of the CHP in 1993, the program had only 15.6. This number rose to approximately 29 in 1996, but fell to approximately 28 in 1997. Out of approximately 65.5 full time psychologists required for the ambulatory mental health services of the CHP in 1993, the program had less than one. This number rose to 26.07 in 1996, but fell to 2.3 in 1997. Out of approximately 32.7 full time psychiatrists required for the ambulatory mental health services of the CHP in 1993, the program had only 7.51. This number rose to approximately 11 in 1995, but had fallen to approximately 9 in 1997. Out of approximately 21.4 full time staff members required for intermediate mental health services in the CHP in 1993, the program had only approximately 12. This number rose to 20.45 in 1995, but had fallen to approximately 13 in 1997. Out of 15 full time social workers required for intermediate mental health services in the CHP in 1993, the program had only 5. This number rose to 15 by 1996, but had fallen to 11 by 1997. Out of approximately 3 full time psychologists needed for intermediate mental health services in the CHP in 1993, the 201 program had approximately 5. This number had fallen to less than 1 by *201 1997, however. Out of approximately 3 full time psychiatrists needed for intermediate mental health services in the CHP in 1993, the program had only approximately 2. This number had fallen to 1 by 1997. Out of approximately 21 full time mental health personnel required for admissions services in the CHP in 1993, the program had only 8.67. This number rose to 11 in 1995, but had fallen to 9.6 by 1997. (These numbers are stated in terms of full-time equivalents.)
272. Because of limitations in staffing, there is a substantial amount of untreated mental illness in the AOC system. Patients are not being evaluated and their mental conditions are deteriorating. In many instances, psychiatric patients requiring hospitalization have been sent to the psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) for emergency treatment. After being stabilized, however, they are released to the general population, where they decompensate, requiring that they once again be sent back to PICU.
273. The failure to provide adequate mental health treatment to an inmate can have a number of results: the inmate can be vulnerable to physical abuse by other inmates; the inmate can cause problems for the general population and staff because the inmate can become disruptive; the inmate diverts the attention of prison staff, so that they cannot deal with other problems; the inmate suffers a great deal of psychic pain because of the illnesses affecting him or her. In addition, if the inmate suffers from depression or has suicidal ideation or a history of previous suicide attempts, the inmate can harm him- or herself. Untreated mental illness in an inmate creates the potential for an increase in the number of suicides. In fiscal year 1996-1997, the AOC system had eleven reported suicides: a fact we reiterate because it is utterly unacceptable.
274. Consolidating emergency mental health care services a the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital would allow the CHP to rends better services to the inmate population. If 14 beds at the PICU in Río Piedras can be freed by using the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital for emergency mental health services, then the former PICU beds can be used as medical dormitory beds until other beds are located elsewhere.
Testimony of Lambert N. King, M.D.
275. Lambert N. King, M.D., was qualified without objection as an expert in correctional health care and the administration of health care programs, in public institutions, not-for-profit, and for-profit corporations, as well as an expert in health care administration within correctional settings, in medical education and internal medicine. His testimony is not only valuable for whatever contributions he may offer as an expert, but for the comprehensive experience and knowledge he has in this case as an expert witness for almost two decades. He was also a member of the Health Care Executive Committee and participated in the Committee's strategic evaluation of the CHP. The court sets out his testimony separately because we take it to express the plaintiffs' position on the urgency of action by the court and for more intense court supervision in this area. Dr. King's testimony, as always, deserves the court's highest respect and credence.
276. Dr. King emphasized the main objectives that the correctional health system in the Commonwealth's prisons should be aimed at in order to provide adequate health services which will meet constitutional standards. In short, these include compliance with contemporary standards of professional practice, an emphasis on preventive

services to the entire inmate population; guarantee accessibility to health care services for all inmates; health education for the correctional population; and monitoring diagnosis and treatment of communicable diseases.
277. Dr. King pinpointed the main obstacles behind the correctional health system's inability to provide or improve the quality of the health services, or even identify and track infectious diseases: (a) budget uncertainty and unpredictability; (b) failure to contract in a stable and predictable manner for required services; (c) relentless bureaucratic and regulatory problems; and (d) the inability to ensure plaintiffs would receive specialized medical care from outside facilities, e.g., emergency, specialized and hospital care.
202 *202 278. Regarding budgetary deficiencies, monitored by the Joint Health Care Executive Committee during the years 1993 through 1996, he stated: "...it was solid, a solid impenetrable wall of crisis. It was one crisis after another and not only did it have inherent problems ... but diverted the attention of the Correctional Health Program's leadership both in the central office and at the institutional levels such that it markedly compromised their ability to achieve other things that they might achieve." This handicap, which he described as fundamental, must be solved by including advance knowledge of what the budget will be, not only or an annual, but on a long term basis. T. 726. This would eliminate uncertainty in the relationships between the programs outside vendors and health services providers, such as laboratory services and pharmacy services, which must necessarily be interdependent with and have a cooperative working relationship with the program. It would also allow for the integration of the delivery system.
279. As for the administrative problems which have made it unable to function as effectively as it could, Dr. King emphatically stated: "...since 1993 the Correctional Health program and the Chief Health Care Coordinator have been submerged by a relentless and impenetrable miasma of bureaucracy which is another type of problem above and beyond the unpredictable budgets." T. 728. As a result, defendants have consistently acted to prevent the CHP from functioning properly in recruiting, contracting for, and retaining essential professional staff as well as in completing the arrangements necessary to assure access for AOC inmates to community-based emergency, subspecialty, and hospital services. Furthermore, the CHP does not have the types of contemporary information systems that are required to run a complex correctional health program. This is a very significant problem, Dr. King concludes. The bureaucratic inefficiencies confronting the program consume the attention of the leadership staff so that they cannot devote the majority of their time and energy to improve the program. Also money is wasted because the program cannot function with flexibility and the autonomy required. Therefore the CHP is trapped in a vicious cycle of inefficiency.
280. The budgetary and administrative managerial problems confronting the CHP have made it difficult to retain some of the better staff that have been recruited in the past, and have made it difficult to recruit high quality staff. He proposed the following measures to achieve the medical and mental health plans' objectives: first, to have adequate, stable, and predictable budgets; second, assure the ability to function with a minimal amount of bureaucratic interference; third, leadership of quality and integrity so that the program is identified as a health care organization run and directed by people of the highest caliber in terms of medical and organizational expertise.
281. Dr. King also commented the possible causes and solutions to the systemic problem of failure to hire and retain health care staff. He pointed out that CHP has suffered recruitment problems particularly in the area of psychiatry. Some of the causes relate to professional compensation, which must be competitive with the market place, but such problems also relate to uncertainty about what the CHP will be in the future. That is, about the aegis under which it functions and the degree to which whatever success and vitality that the CHP has relates to the involvement of the Court.
282. Therefore, Dr. King stressed the importance of giving an assured identity and an assured future to the CHP, so that a physician or nurse or health care administrator that considers working for it will know who they are working for and will have some reasonable assurance that they can devote at least a significant portion of the professional life to the organization and program.
283. Regarding systemic problems related to proper, safe and adequate facilities, Dr. King stated that the CHP has been plagued by the types of facilities in which its staff must work. One of the manifestations of the facilities problems confronting the CHP is that the program areas are substandard, unattractive, and nonfunctional in

203 many respects, and lack such things as sinks and private areas for interviewing patients. *203 Many institutions are haphazardly planned and located so that there is a great deal of inefficiency and waste. Staff cannot communicate or work together effectively and a great deal of time is wasted assuring that patients will be where they need to be at the right time and in the right place. There has been no timely progress toward the renovation and construction for the health care facilities that are needed by the CHP in order to attract and retain all necessary professional staff and to assure satisfactory and efficient medical and mental health services.
284. Far-reaching and relatively drastic measures are required to reform the CHP; these measures require some form of court intervention. To remedy and correct the situation now faced by the CHP, which was preventable, the action required must be stronger than what has been done in the past. The level of court intervention required, which should last a period of years, should be that degree that will assure that the CHP will devote itself to its mission as a health care and public health organization "without being consumed by unnecessary bureaucracy or by lack of any assurance that it will have an adequate budget in the future and by some type of mechanism that will establish the authority and the relative degree of autonomy that experts who can be relied upon will be allowed to carry out their tasks". The objective of an adequate budget process and a sense of relative permanency can be accomplished through a private not-for-profit health care corporation whose primary mission is correctional health care.
VI. DEFENDANTS AWARENESS OF PROBLEMS
285. The testimonial evidence and massive documentary evidence (together with the long history of this case), leave no doubt that the defendants have been well aware of the problems set out above. With respect to budgeting matters, representatives of the Correctional Health Program, in addition to the Chief Health Care Coordinator, communicated in writing and in person on numerous occasions with the Secretary of Health, who also served as the Executive Director of AFASS. The Chief Health Care Coordinator, in an attempt to resolve budgetary crises, also met or communicated on numerous occasions between 1994 and 1997 with the Governor's Personal Representative and the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. Even after these attempts to resolve the budgetary problems described above, as late as fiscal year 1997-1998, the budgetary request to the Legislature for the Correctional Health Program fell far short of the program's estimated needs. The budgetary problems experienced by the Correctional Health Program have, in addition, been the subject of litigation in the Morales Feliciano case. See, for example, the discussion concerning plaintiffs' 1995 motion seeking a preliminary injunction. In addition, a letter from the Director of the Office of Management and Budget sent in February 1997 to the Secretary of Health indicates that he was well aware that the issue of adequate funding for correctional health services was a critical issue in the Morales Feliciano case. In spite of this fact, the budget request for the Correctional Health Program submitted to the legislature for the 1997-1998 fiscal year fell far short of the Program's needs.
286. Defendants also have been aware of the many problems that hinder efforts by the Correctional Health Program to recruit and maintain sufficient staff. Program personnel sent numerous memoranda to AFASS and the Secretary of Health between 1993 and 1997 describing the difficulties encountered in recruiting staff, requesting assistance in processing contracts for professional staff, in improving benefits and pay for Correctional Health staff, and with other problems experienced by the program.
287. In addition to the foregoing, most of the problems described above have been described in reports of the Court Monitor confirmed by the court and in semi-annual reports produced by the Chief Health Care Coordinator and filed by defendants. See, for example, the Seventh Semi-Annual Report concerning correctional health care, which defendants filed in 1993 (Docket # 4620). The need for greater autonomy in the Correctional Health 204 Program was the subject of intense negotiation in 1995 after plaintiffs filed a Petition for Preliminary Injunction *204 to Compel Defendants to Adequately Fund the Correctional Health Care Program (Docket # 5762). These negotiations culminated in an administrative order that purported to grant the requisite authority to the Correctional Health Program, but which did not accomplish its purpose, which was evident to the Secretary of Health through numerous communications throughout the remainder of 1996 and into 1997.

288. In short, the persistence of the problems described above go beyond deliberate indifference or reckless disregard and can be ascribed to intentional acts on the part of defendants. What is not there is what the defendants have intended and still intend not to be there. It is not a question only of mere administrative incompetence, these are willed, intended results. Prejudice against inmates throughout the prison system and throughout the public health systems is one of the factors that hinders the delivery of health care to inmates.
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Continuing Violations of Plaintiffs Federal Constitutional Rights
289. The uncontested facts and evidence regarding the present status or conditions of the correctional health delivery system and its administration amply support the conclusion, as a matter of law, that the plaintiff class' constitutional rights have been and continue to be violated by defendants. The record as well as the applicable law reveal that this is not a matter of simple noncompliance or default with Court Orders or Stipulations by the parties. The violations of Federal rights that are in evidence are of constitutional import and relevance as to mandate immediate remedial and injunctive action. A shift on emphasis from mere noncompliance to pervasive and continuous disregard to constitutional rights is mandatory when evaluating the legal impact of the facts supported by the record.
290. Defendants have violated plaintiffs' rights under the Eighth, Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments to the United States Constitution by failing to provide inmates with adequate and reasonable health care. See Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 97 S.Ct. 285, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976) (Estelle).
The Unnecessary and Wanton Infliction of Pain to Plaintiffs
291. Defendants' acts constitute the unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain and violates the "cruel and unusual punishment" component of the Eighth Amendment.
292. "[T]he treatment a prisoner receives in prison and the conditions under which he is confined are subject to scrutiny under the Eighth Amendment". Helling v. McKinney, 509 U.S. 25, 31, 113 S.Ct. 2475, 125 L.Ed.2d 22 (1993) (Helling). As the Court explained in DeShaney v. Winnebago County Dept. of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189, 199-200, 109 S.Ct. 998, 103 L.Ed.2d 249 (1989) (DeShaney):
"... The rationale for this principle is simple enough: when the State by the affirmative exercise of its powers so restrains an individual's liberty that it renders him unable to care for himself, and at the same time fails to provide for his basic human needs 0907 e.g., food, clothing, shelter, medical care, and reasonable safety 0907 it transgresses the substantive limits on state action set by the Eighth Amendment ...".
Although the Constitution does not mandate comfortable prisons, Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 349, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981) (Rhodes); "...neither does it permit inhumane ones..." Farmer v. Brennan, 511 U.S. 825, 832, 114 S.Ct. 1970, 128 L.Ed.2d 811 (1994) (Farmer).
293. The prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment contained in the Eighth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States has been made applicable to the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico either through incorporation into the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment or as a result of the long history of its application in our District. Morales Feliciano, et al. v. Romero Barcelo, et al., 672 F.Supp. 591, 616 (D.P.R. 1986) (Morales Feliciano II). Indeed earlier in this very case, this court emphasized that the Administration of Corrections in 205 Puerto Rico is constitutionally required to provide "`reasonably adequate [...] shelter, *205 sanitation, medical care and personal safety'" under the Fifth and Eighth Amendments. Morales Feliciano (II), Id., at 619 (emphasis added, internal citations omitted). See also, Feliciano v. Barcelo, 497 F.Supp. 14, 33-34 (1979) (Morales Feliciano II). In the present case, the plaintiff class is constitutionally protected under the Eighth Amendment from the denial of reasonably adequate health care. Rhodes, 452 U.S. at 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392; Estelle v. Gamble, supra. In

Morales Feliciano II the Court, citing Estelle, emphasized: "... the denial of medical care is cruel and unusual because, in the worst case, it can result in physical torture, and, even in less serious cases, it can result in pain without any penological purpose." 672 F.Supp. at 617. Moreover, as stated by the Supreme Court in the landmark decision of Estelle "in the worst cases, [the government's failure to provide medical care for those whom it is punishing by incarceration] may actually produce physical `torture or a lingering death[.]'" Estelle, 429 U.S., at 103, 97 S.Ct. 285 (citations omitted).
294. Applicable constitutional interpretation of the cruel and unusual component of the Eighth Amendment has established that a violation exists when the conditions of confinement "involve unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain", or are "grossly disproportionate to the severity of the crime warranting imprisonment". Rhodes, 452 U.S. at 347, 101 S.Ct. 2392.
295. The content of what constitutes unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain under the Eighth Amendment derives from "`broad and idealistic concepts of dignity, civilized standards, humanity, and decency ...'", Estelle, 429 U.S. at 102, 97 S.Ct. 285, quoting from Jackson v. Bishop, 404 F.2d 571, 579 (8th Cir.1968), and from "`... the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society.'" Id. quoting Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 101, 78 S.Ct. 590, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958)(Trop). The court in Morales Feliciano II, 672 F.Supp. at 617-619, has relied on the high penological standards set up by Article II, §§ 7 and 12 of the Constitution of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico which prohibits, among others, the death penalty as well as cruel and unusual punishment. Also, legislative enactments of Puerto Rico's Legislative Assembly specifically require that adequate medical care and hospital services be provided to the inmates as part of the contemporary values of the Puerto Rican society, which give content to the constitutional protection, from wanton infliction of pain embodied in the Eighth Amendment and its Puerto Rican counterpart. See 4. P.R. Laws Ann. § 1112(f).
Defendants Deliberate Indifference to Plaintiff Class
296. In order to prove that the defendants have violated plaintiffs' rights to be free from cruel and unusual punishment, plaintiffs must come forth with evidence sufficient to sustain that defendants acted with "deliberate indifference" toward a federally protected right. In the present case, plaintiffs' proof required a showing that defendants' actions amounted to "deliberate indifference to a serious medical need." Estelle, 429 U.S. at 106, 97 S.Ct. 285. See; Wilson v. Seiter, 501 U.S. 294, 299-300, 111 S.Ct. 2321, 115 L.Ed.2d 271 (1991) (Wilson); DesRosiers v. Moran, 949 F.2d 15, 18 (1st Cir.1991)(DesRosiers). The analysis required by the standard of deliberate indifference is two-fold: 1) the objective component which looks at the existence of a sufficiently serious deprivation of a "single, identifiable human need" in the present case, adequate medical care); and, 2) the subjective component which inquires whether the required mental state of the defendants was present in the deprivation (Was it wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain?). Wilson, at 305, 111 S.Ct. 2321; DesRosiers, at 18. Plaintiffs must prove that defendants had a "culpable state of mind and intended wantonly to inflict pain." DesRosiers, at 19.
297. In order to establish that defendants wantonly and deliberately intended to inflict pain under the deliberate indifference standard of Estelle, the defendants' state of mind may be established by "... the official's response to an inmate's known needs or by denial, delay or interference with prescribed health care." DesRosiers, at 19, quoting Estelle, supra at 104-05, 97 S.Ct. 285. Deliberate indifference may also be established in cases where 206 the attention received *206 by the inmate is "`so clearly inadequate as to amount to a refusal to provide essential care.'" Torraco, 923 F.2d at 234, quoting Miranda v. Munoz, 770 F.2d 255, 259 (1st Cir.1985) (Miranda).
298. Accidental or mere negligence in the provision of adequate health care to a prisoner is not sufficient for a finding of Eighth Amendment violation. DesRosiers, 949 F.2d at 19 ("inadvertent failures to provide medical care, even if negligent, do not sink to the level of deliberate indifference") (citations omitted).
299. The evidence presented by plaintiff class amply satisfies the standards stated above, and amply establishes that defendants' actions constitute deliberate indifference to the plaintiff class' serious medical needs in violation of applicable constitutional provisions. There is substantial evidence that defendants actions or lack thereof has caused or contributed to the deaths of class members and to the infliction of pain and suffering on countless others.

Systemic Deliberate Indifference
300. In class action cases challenging the entire system, the deliberate indifference standard may be shown, as stated in Ramos v. Lamm, 639 F.2d 559, 575 (10th Cir.1980) cert. denied 450 U.S. 1041, 101 S.Ct. 1759, 68 L.Ed.2d 239 (1981): "... by proving repeated examples of negligent acts which disclose a pattern of conduct by the prison medical staff ... or by proving there are such systemic deficiencies in staffing, facilities, equipment or procedures that the inmate population is effectively denied access to adequate medical care." See Todaro v. Ward, 565 F.2d 48, 52 (2d Cir.1977).
301. "...[S]ystemic deficiencies in staffing, facilities, or procedures [which] make unnecessary suffering inevitable" constitute deliberate indifference. Todaro v. Ward, 565 F.2d at 52, quoting Bishop v. Stoneman, 508 F.2d 1224, 1226 (2d Cir.1974); accord, Harris v. Thigpen, 941 F.2d 1495, 1505 (11th Cir. 1991); DeGidio v. Pung, 920 F.2d 525, 529 (8th Cir.1990) (lack of "adequate organization and control in the administration of health services"supported finding of Eighth Amendment violation); Free v. Granger, 887 F.2d 1552, 1556 (11th Cir.1989) ("Proof of staffing or procedural deficiencies may give rise to a finding of deliberate indifference"); French v. Owens, 777 F.2d 1250, 1254 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 817, 107 S.Ct. 77, 93 L.Ed.2d 32 (1986).
302. The hearing record as a whole supports a finding of such systemic deficiencies in staffing, facilities, procedures, and administration.
303. Defendants have long been perfectly aware both of the level of care required and the level of care actually provided. During the 17 years since the Court's initial grant of relief concerning medical and mental health care, defendants' continued litigation of health care issues has enabled them to become increasingly knowledgeable of both plaintiffs health care needs and of defendants' obligations under the U.S. Constitution. Defendants have failed despite these years of opportunity, encouragement, and coercion to comply with the court's orders and establish a constitutional system of prison health care.
304. Defendants act with deliberate indifference because they are not responsive to the plaintiff class' known needs or when they deny, delay or interfere with prescribed health care due to systemic mismanagement of resources. Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104-05, 97 S.Ct. 285; DesRosiers, supra. The vast majority of the testimonies reveal that the defendants know and understand plaintiff class' need for adequate and basic health care but continue nonetheless to deny or delay said care wantonly and deliberately due greatly to systemic failures.
305. The combination of individualized and systemic health care conditions amount to a deprivation of prisoners' rights pursuant to applicable constitutional provisions. The Supreme Court clarified that although some conditions of confinement alone could not amount to a deprivation of constitutional rights, others may establish an Eighth Amendment violation "`in combination' when each would not do so alone." Wilson, 501 U.S. at 304, 111 S.Ct. 207 2321. Conditions of confinement "in combination" may support a finding of constitutional violation when the *207 conditions "have a mutually enforcing effect that produces the deprivation of a single, identifiable human need such as food, warmth, or exercise ...". Id. For instance, placing a schizophrenic inmate in a badly overcrowded cell amounts to a "recipe for an explosion" and "death". Cortes-Quinones v. Jimenez Nettleship, 842 F.2d 556, 558-560 (1st Cir.1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 823, 109 S.Ct. 68, 102 L.Ed.2d 45 (1988)(Cortes-Quinones).
306. Similarly, defendants' lack of adequate organization and control in the administration of health services has been noted by the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in Miranda, 770 F.2d at 261, fn. 4: "This is not a case in which it is inconsistent to find liability on the part of both the local prison officials and the central prison administration. A jury could have found that it was the combination of conditions authorized by the Correctional Department [sic] and specific actions taken by the Arecibo Jail Official's which caused plaintiffs' injury" (italics in original). Regarding lack of adequate organization and control in the administration of health services that are tantamount to deliberate indifference, see also: Todaro, 565 F.2d at 52; Harris v. Thigpen, 941 F.2d 1495, 1505 (11th Cir.1991); DeGidio v. Pung, 920 F.2d 525, 529-33 (8th Cir.1990).
307. In addition, defendants have consistently failed to provide adequate sanitation and security to correctional health personnel thereby contributing to the development of hostile and indifferent attitudes toward inmates'

overall health needs. The resulting circumstances no doubt amount to deliberate indifference as proscribed under the law.
308. The non-existence of an integral system or unitary institutional structure of administration and delivery of health services denies the plaintiff class or delays their access to necessary medical care in wanton disregard to basic medical and human needs, causing infliction of pain without any penological purpose. Defendants' breakdown of regularity and continuity of services, including medical services, inflicts on inmates psychological and medical harm in wanton disregard of their constitutionally protected right to reasonably adequate health care within contemporary medical standards of professional care. Such systemic deficiencies in the administration of the corrections system, especially the lack of security and the administration of the health care services constitute deliberate indifference and disregard to defendants' legal duties, in violation of the plaintiffs' constitutionally protected right to reasonably adequate health care.
309. The undisputed and uncontested facts of this case support the conclusion that defendants' acts and omissions are deliberately indifferent to basic human and health needs of inmates and that the pervasive and continuous egregious conditions in prison health facilities constitute wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain of the kind specifically proscribed by the Fifth and Eighth Amendments. Estelle, supra. Moreover, defendants' reckless indifference to the chaotic, isolated administration and/or mismanagement of health services, constitute daily violations of statutory laws and regulations requiring reasonable medical care and thus, deprive inmates of their liberty without the due process of law as contained in the Fourteenth Amendment. Cameron, supra.
Defendants Violations of the Health Care Required by Applicable Constitutional Standards Is Egregious.
310. In the present case, the plaintiff class is constitutionally protected under the Eighth Amendment from the denial of reasonably adequate health care. Rhodes, 452 U.S. at 347; Estelle, 429 U.S. at 103, 97 S.Ct. 285. In the landmark Estelle opinion, the Supreme Court concluded that "acts or omissions sufficiently harmful to evidence deliberate indifference to serious medical needs of prisoners" violate constitutional standards for it amounted to unnecessary and wanton infliction of pain. 429 U.S. at 106, 97 S.Ct. 285 (emphasis added). The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit has defined that "serious medical need" is one "that has been diagnosed by a physician as mandating treatment, or one that is so obvious that even a lay person would easily recognize the necessity for a doctor's attention". Gaudreault v. Municipality of Salem, 923 F.2d 203, 208 (1st Cir.1990) (citations omitted)(Gaudreault).
208 *208 311. The "seriousness" of an inmate's medical need may also be determined by reference to the effects of a delay in treatment. Gaudreault, Id. at 208. "Serious medical needs" also include conditions that threaten to cause health problems in the future. In Helling, 509 U.S. at 32-33, 113 S.Ct. 2475 the Supreme Court established, in the context of involuntary exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) by inmates, that the Eighth Amendment also protects against future harm to the inmates' health.
312. In this case, the inability of health care personnel to treat Hepatitis C, to administer triple therapy to HIV + and AIDS patients and to properly isolate cases of active tuberculosis inflicts cruel and unusual punishment on particular individuals at present, endangers their health in the future and threatens the health of all the members of the class. That this happens because defendants cannot provide security to their own personnel is all the more indicative of defendants' recklessness in the face of repeated complaints and reports about this state of affairs.
313. Serious medical needs refer indistinctly to mental and physical ailments. It is well settled law in the First Circuit that the Eighth Amendment also protects against deliberate indifference to an inmate's serious mental health and safety needs. Cortes-Quinones, 842 F.2d at 560. The extension of the Eighth Amendment protection from physical health needs, as presented in Estelle, to mental health needs is appropriate according to First Circuit standards due to the fact that there is "`[n]o underlying distinction between the right to medical care for physical ills and its psychological or psychiatric counterpart.'" Torraco v. Maloney, 923 F.2d 231, 234 (1st Cir.1991) (citations omitted) (Torraco).

314. The evaluation of the adequacy of health care revolves around the inquiry of whether the services are "... at a level reasonably commensurate with modern medical science and of a quality acceptable within prudent professional standards." U.S. v. DeCologero, 821 F.2d 39, 43 (1st Cir.1987)(DeCologero). The standard of care does not include the "most sophisticated care that money can buy", DeCologero, Id. at 42, but only that which is reasonably appropriate "within modern and prudent professional standards" in the field of medicine and health.
315. As the record shows, defendants have continuously acted with deliberate indifference toward the standards of care "within modern and prudent professional standards" by delaying or denying access to medical attention to serious and urgent medical needs of inmates, all this without any penological purpose. Estelle, supra. The record is full of instances showing failure by defendants to take the necessary steps to provide access or avoid delay in access to medical and health care as, for example, failure to make provision for triple therapy for HIV + and AIDS patients; insufficient medical dormitory beds for patients who require close medical supervision; the placement of patients with chronic illnesses in camps that lack the medical facilities they need; unwarranted delay in providing transportation to emergency facilities, and the long delays in scheduling specialty care appointments and the failure actually to comply with them, which constitutes a denial of access to such specialized care. Waldrop v. Evans, 871 F.2d 1030, 1036 (11th Cir.1989). See also, Inmates of Occoquan v. Barry, 717 F.Supp. 854, 867 (D.D.C.1989) (Inmates of Occoquan) (where deliberate indifference was shown by defendants' failure to have a follow up system for treating chronic diseases).
316. The record in this case includes yet other forms of deliberate indifference by defendants to the required standards of professional of care. As the findings clearly reveal, defendants have also neglected to fully screen incoming inmates for infectious diseases such as tuberculosis or to detect mental health problems. Such or similar omissions have been held to violate the Constitution in Lareau v. Manson, 651 F.2d 96, 109 (2d Cir.1981); Inmates of Occoquan, supra; DeGidio, 920 F.2d at 529-33. The record further evinces that defendants, as a matter of course, fail to inquire into essential facts and fail to conduct routine tests necessary to provide adequate 209 medical care. *209 Likewise, the record illustrates defendants' failure to inquire about the inmates' prior medical history.
317. Defendants have failed to provide for a sick call system that ensures access to care and that is capable of effectively handling emergencies. By so doing, defendants endanger the lives of the inmates by denying or delaying access to health care. In the Seventh Circuit this type of deficiency supported a finding of deliberate indifference. See, Bass v. Wallenstein, 769 F.2d 1173, 1184-86 (7th Cir.1985); Inmates of Occoquan, supra, at 867 (deliberate indifference shown by sick call system which relied heavily on medical technical assistants by allowing them to diagnose and dispense medication without proper supervision by trained medical staff).
318. Similarly, the failure to carry out medical orders by neglecting to provide prescribed medication or disregarding special recommendations for surgery or specialized care, when officials are subjectively aware of conditions requiring intervention, is deliberate indifference according to Mahan v. Plymouth County House of Corrections, 64 F.3d 14, 18 (1st Cir.1995).
319. Another recognized form of deliberate indifference is "intentionally interfering with the treatment once prescribed." Estelle, 429 U.S. at 105, 97 S.Ct. 285. Examples of this form of deliberate indifference are the failure consistently to administer "unit dose" medication, the failure to provide transportation to scheduled specialty appointments and physical therapy, and the failure to provide prescribed medical diets.
320. Defendants' manifest inability to adequately train, supervise or retain health care personnel which results in rampant under-staffing and the consequent impossibility to adequately meet the needs of the inmate population constitute deliberate indifference towards the health care needs of the plaintiff class. In Newman v. Alabama, 503 F.2d 1320, 1331 (5th Cir.1974), cert. denied 421 U.S. 948, 95 S.Ct. 1680, 44 L.Ed.2d 102 (1975), the Fifth Circuit held that "the inexorable nonattention and delays in receiving treatment attributable to personnel shortages, the ill-conceived system for referrals of inmates ... from other facilities, and the maladroitly operated `emergency' referral system also present grave constitutional problems." For a discussion of the nature and consequence of insufficient or inadequate mental health staff. See Greason v. Kemp, 891 F.2d 829, 838 (11th Cir.1990); See also Inmates of Occoquan, at 868.

321. As the testimony of Dr. Aida Guzmán reveals, severely mentally ill patients (a population that has significantly increased in recent years) continue to cohabit with the general population without being tendered any type of mental health treatment. In Cortes-Quinones, 842 F.2d at 560-61, this was found to violate the Constitution. See also, Inmates of Occoquan, 717 F.Supp. at 868 (housing mentally ill inmates with punitive segregation inmates violated Eighth Amendment rights of inmates).
322. In addition, defendants' admitted failure to hospitalize inmates whose mental health condition require the therapeutic environment of a mental health treatment facility constitutes deliberate indifference to an inmate's health care needs. Arnold on Behalf of H.B. v. Lewis, 803 F.Supp. 246, 257 (D.Ariz.1992).
323. Moreover, defendants have admitted to the repeated failure to timely provide necessary medical care outside their facilities, when not available internally, due in part to lack of personnel or transportation means. Evidence exists on the record showing that delays have endangered the life of inmates. This not only falls considerably short of acceptable professional standards but has also expressly been held to violate the Constitution. Miltier v. Beorn, 896 F.2d 848, 853 (4th Cir.1990); Inmates of Occoquan, supra.
324. Constitutional violations by defendants are further evidenced by their failure to provide and maintain adequate facilities and equipment necessary for the provision of adequate health care of inmates pursuant to acceptable professional standards. It is undisputed that defendants have consistently failed to provide adequate 210 sanitation *210 and security measures to correctional health personnel, thereby contributing to the development of hostile and indifferent attitudes towards inmates overall health needs. When combined with other constitutional violations, the state of deterioration and unfitness of correctional health facilities and equipment further reinforce the deep-seated deliberate indifference of defendants toward the inmates' constitutionally protected rights. Langley v. Coughlin, 888 F.2d 252, 254 (2d Cir.1989); Williams v. Edwards, 547 F.2d 1206, 1216-17 (5th Cir.1977); Newman, 503 F.2d, at 1331; Morales Feliciano It, supra, at 34.
325. Furthermore, the upkeep, administration and transfer of medical records by defendants is yet another of their indisputable constitutional shortcomings. Defendants have shown a manifest ineptitude in maintaining adequate medical records that are available to health personnel when needed. Miranda supra, at 261; Brown v. Coughlin, 758 F.Supp. 876, 882 (S.D.N.Y. 1991); Burks v. Teasdale, 492 F.Supp. 650, 676 (W.D.Mo.1980); Inmates of Occoquan, supra. Systemic deficiencies related to management of medical records obstructs good patient tracking within the system, affects the continuity of care and therefore impedes the adequate delivery of health care in violation of the plaintiffs' constitutional rights.
326. In addition, the defendants' failure to provide necessary medical diets has been held as deliberate indifference. Kyle v. Allen, 732 F.Supp. 1157, 1159 (S.D.Fla.1990); Johnson v. Harris, 479 F.Supp. 333, 336-37 (S.D.N.Y.1979). Budgetary limitations or inadequate resources, as alleged by defendants in this case, can never be a valid justification for constitutional violations as the court has determined. Morales-Feliciano v. HernandezColon, 697 F.Supp. 26, 35 (D.P.R.1987).
327. The undisputed facts of this case support the conclusion that defendants' acts and omissions, separately and in combination, are deliberately indifferent to basic human and health needs of inmates and that the pervasive and continuous egregious conditions in prison health facilities constitute wanton and unnecessary infliction of pain of the kind specifically proscribed by the Fifth and Eighth Amendments. Estelle, supra. The evidence presented at trial incontestably established that defendants are perfectly aware both of the level of care required and the level of care actually provided. No surprise or ignorance may be claimed before a factual situation that has been well documented since the initial stages of this litigation as corroborated by the decisions previously rendered by this court.
328. A number of specific practices or failings shown by this record are identical or similar to matters that have been held to violate the Constitution. These include:
a. The failure to screen incoming inmates for infectious diseases including tuberculosis. Lareau v. Manson, 651 F.2d 96, 109-11 (2d Cir.1981).

b. The failure to provide access to specialized care required by a prisoner's medical condition. Howell v. Evans, 922 F.2d 712, 723 (11th Cir.1991) (failure to provide access to a respiratory therapist could constitute deliberate indifference), vacated as settled, 931 F.2d 711 (11th Cir.1991); Waldrop v. Evans, 871 F.2d 1030, 1036 (11th Cir.) (nonpsychiatrist was not competent to evaluate significance of a prisoner's suicidal gesture; prison officials must "inform competent authorities" of medical or psychiatric needs) (emphasis supplied), rehearing denied, 880 F.2d 421 (11th Cir.1989); Tillery v. Owens, 719 F.Supp. 1256, 1307 (W.D.Pa.1989) (services of cardiologist and dermatologist should be provided), aff'd, 907 F.2d 418 (3d Cir. 1990).
c. The failure to provide a sick call system that ensures that prisoners receive needed care. Bass by Lewis v. Wallenstein, 769 F.2d 1173, 1184-86 (7th Cir.1985) (known deficiencies in sick call system supported a finding of deliberate indifference).
d. The failure to provide mental health staff adequate to meet the needs of the population. Greason v. Kemp, 891 F.2d 829, 837-40 (11th Cir.1990) (prison clinic director, prison system mental health director, and prison warden could be found deliberately indifferent based on their knowing toleration of a "clearly inadequate" mental health 211 staff); *211 Cabrales v. County of Los Angeles, 864 F.2d 1454, 1461 (9th Cir.1988) (under staffing such that psychiatric staff could only spend "minutes per month" with disturbed inmates was unconstitutional), vacated, 494 U.S. 1091, 110 S.Ct. 1838, 108 L.Ed.2d 966 (1990), reinstated, 886 F.2d 235 (9th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1091, 110 S.Ct. 1838, 108 L.Ed.2d 966 (1990).
e. Leaving severely mentally ill prisoners in general population without mental health treatment. Cortes-Quinones v. Jimenez-Nettleship, 842 F.2d 556, 560-61 (1st Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 823, 109 S.Ct. 68, 102 L.Ed.2d 45 (1988).
f. The failure to hospitalize prisoners whose mental health condition requires hospitalization. Arnold on Behalf of H.B. v. Lewis, 803 F.Supp. 246, 257 (D.Ariz.1992).
g. The failure timely to provide necessary medical care outside the prison when it is not available within the prison. Kaminsky v. Rosenblum, 929 F.2d 922, 927 (2d Cir.1991) (failure to act on recommendation of immediate hospitalization); Miltier v. Beorn, 896 F.2d 848, 853 (4th Cir.1990) (failure to act on a recommendation for transfer to a cardiology unit); Washington v. Dugger, 860 F.2d 1018, 1021 (11th Cir.1988) (failure to return patient to VA hospital for treatment for Agent Orange exposure); Inmates of Occoquan v. Barry, 717 F.Supp. 854, 867 (D.D.C. 1989) (Eighth Amendment violation found in part because "inmates wait months for appointments to specialty clinics"); United States v. State of Michigan, 680 F.Supp. 928, 1002 (W.D.Mich.1987) (prison officials "may not allow security or transportation concerns to override a medical determination that a particular inmate is in need of prompt treatment and must be transported to an appropriate facility.").
h. The failure to provide adequate facilities and equipment for necessary medical care. Langley v. Coughlin, 888 F.2d 252, 254 (2d Cir.1989); Inmates of Allegheny County Jail v. Wecht, 874 F.2d 147, 153 (3d Cir.1989) (inadequate space for mental health facilities supported an order closing the jail), vacated and remanded on other grounds, 493 U.S. 948, 110 S.Ct. 355, 107 L.Ed.2d 343 (1989); Newman v. Alabama, 503 F.2d 1320. 1331 (5th Cir.1974); Tillery v. Owens, 719 F.Supp. 1256, 1307 (W.D.Pa.1989) (condemning infirmary's lack of space, unsanitary conditions, and deficiencies in equipment and supplies), aff'd, 907 F.2d 418 (3d Cir.1990).
i. The failure to ensure that medical records are available to practitioners treating the prisoner. Miranda v. Munoz, 770 F.2d 255, 261 (1st Cir.1985) (prison officials' knowledge of continuing problem of prisoners arriving at hospital without their medical records cited as a basis for damage liability); Brown v. Coughlin, 758 F.Supp. 876, 882 (S.D.N.Y.1991) ("failure to transfer necessary medical records in a timely fashion" supported a deliberate indifference claim); see Burks v. Teasdale, 492 F.Supp. 650, 676 (W.D.Mo.1980) and cases cited (noting that medical records are essential to continuity of medical care).
j. The failure to provide necessary medical diets. Kyle v. Allen, 732 F.Supp. 1157, 1159 (S.D.Fla.1990); Balla v. Idaho State Bd. of Corrections, 595 F.Supp. 1558, 1574-75 (D.Idaho 1984); Johnson v. Harris, 479 F.Supp. 333, 336-37 (S.D.N.Y.1979). The facts of this case indisputably sustain the conclusion that defendants have deprived and continue to deprive the plaintiff class of reasonably adequate health care within modern and prudent

professional standards of care. The vast majority of the testimonies reveal that the defendants know about the plaintiff class' need for adequate and basic health care but continue to deny or delay said care wantonly and deliberately due to systemic failures. Yet, defendants' reckless and deliberate indifference the chaotic, isolated administration and/or mismanagement of health services, constitute daily violations of statutory laws and regulations requiring reasonable health care and thus, deprive inmates of their liberty without the due process of law as contained in the Fourteenth Amendment. Cameron, 990 F.2d at 18.
329. Defendants' chaotic and arbitrary administration of the correctional health system, the absence of standards and daily violations of statutory law in the area of health care as well as the failure to provide for proper sanitation 212 or a safe environment, have *212 also produced a deprivation of liberty interests of inmates without due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, as ruled by this Court since 1980 and specifically on 1986. Morales Feliciano I, 497 F.Supp. at 18 (1980); Morales Feliciano II, 672 F.Supp. at 620-621. According to applicable case law from the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment prohibits a state from extending an inmate's detention indefinitely and limits the state's capability to worsen an inmate's condition. The Due Process clause mandates a state to balance the competing demands and interests properly after which a state correctional facility may not choose alternatives or provide for circumstances that unwarrantedly lengthen an inmate's term. Cameron v. Tomes, 990 F.2d 14, 21-22 (1st Cir.1993)(Cameron). The plaintiff class has brought forth ample evidence that it has a cognizable claim under the Fourteenth Amendment since the defendants' "ordinary procedures and constraints affirmatively and needlessly worsen their mental health condition, such that members of the class might well be confined long after their sentences" expire due to the wanton and reckless infliction of pain and suffering during their imprisonment. Cameron, Id. at 18.
330. This court's conclusions are not altered by the undoubtedly sincere good intentions expressed on the witness stand by the outgoing Secretary of the Treasure, nor by the commitments he made as the Governor's expressly authorized representative, nor by the assurances of defense counsel on behalf of the government, nor by actions taken in the weeks before the hearing. The court has heard such professions before, and after the passage of years of noncompliance, the dispositive factor must be the long-standing failure to achieve compliance. See Dixon v. Barry, 967 F.Supp. at 553-54 (activity and promises of improvement in response to receivership motion are insufficient to avert appointment of a receiver); LaShawn A. v. Kelly, 887 F.Supp. at 315 ("While it is true that the defendants have made some progress in various areas, the [court's] factual findings show the urgent need for a new, more fundamental approach to change. Otherwise, each report of incremental progress will be mitigated by regression in another area or future inaction on that first step forward. Much of the progress originally made is now slipping back into the same tired way of doing business that brought these parties before the Court."); Wayne County Jail Inmates v. Wayne County Chief Executive Officer, 444 N.W.2d at 560 (same conclusion as to "flurry of compliance activities" in response to receivership motion).
331. The facts the court has found in this case, are supported by ample evidence, and show without doubt that the defendants in this case have failed in their constitutionally required obligation to provide inmates reasonably adequate medical care, as well as reasonably adequate shelter, sanitation and personal safety, under the Eighth, Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. As result, the plaintiff class is entitled to continued federal injunctive relief for the protection of their constitutional rights.
REMEDY
332. Therefore the court holds that it is necessary, to protect the members of the plaintiff class from cruel and unusual punishment through constitutionally unacceptable health care services, to continue in full force that part of the Order Directing Partial Judgment filed January 22, 1996, (Dkt.6091) and the Partial Judgment entered on January 24, 1996, (Dkt.6093) which relates to health care. This remedy extends no further than is necessary to correct the violation of the Federal rights of members of the plaintiff class. The court finds that such relief is narrowly drawn and certainly extends no further than is necessary to correct the violation of plaintiffs' Federal rights. There is no less intrusive means to correct the violation of plaintiffs' Federal rights.

333. The court further finds that the conditions described above are a danger to public health and security and that Puerto Rico's criminal justice system can only be improved by the implementation of the court's prior orders 213 and judgment. Cost saving efficiency and institutional security will result from the *213 implementation of those orders and judgment.
334. The court at this time will not decide whether or not to appoint a receiver, and under which circumstances and conditions such a receiver can and should be appointed. But the court must take the necessary steps to assure that its orders and judgment are obeyed and that the violations of plaintiffs' Federal rights cease. To do so the court will build on the remedial structure that is already in place.
335. The Medical Plan at paragraph 49, page 20 established that
Within 90 days, the DOH shall prepare and submit to the Central Personnel Office (OCA) a reimbursement schedule for physicians, dentists and nurses whose services are required to achieve the purposes and objectives of this Medical Care Plan. The schedule, a copy of which shall be filed with the Court, shall take into consideration travel allowance, malpractice insurance, and continuing medical education. The reimbursement schedule for professionals shall be at a level sufficient to recruit and retain qualified professional staff including specialists. (Emphasis added.)
336. The parties have jointly requested an order to allow the Chief Health Care Coordinator untrammeled authority to process.
337. The Hon. Manuel Diaz Saldaña, then Secretary of the Treasury, now Comptroller of Puerto Rico, deprecated the ruling by the former Comptroller that the Correctional Health Program could not contract "on-call" physicians. He also stated that the delays on requesting bids and awarding contracts were unacceptable.
338. In their Joint Proposal Concerning the Correctional Health Program of September 26, 1997 (Dkt.6673) at paragraph 12, pages 7-8, the parties agreed that
The success of any effort to provide constitutionally-mandated health care to the plaintiff class will require coordination and support from the Administration of Correction. In 1994, the parties incorporated into the Stipulation Regarding Custodial and Sociopenal Staffing (Docket # 5241) a provision that defendants would "assign a permanent cadre of medical security personnel to occupy intra-institutional escort posts, extra-institutional escort posts, and general medical security posts, which include manning medical dormitories, medical areas, psychiatric care centers, and drug abuse treatment areas." It is crucial that the provisions be implemented as part of the overall solution to the health care problems confronting the plaintiff class. The implementation of these provisions will require that the following steps be taken in preparation:
a. The Executive Director of the CHP and the parties will confer with consultants to determine the selection, training, and qualifications necessary for a medical cadre.
b. The recruitment and training of the medical cadre must be coordinated with the Administrator of Correction.
c. A specialized training program for the officers who will make up the medical cadre (and for those officers who will be assigned to the cadre in the future) must be developed.
d. The parties will respectfully request that the Court provide necessary funding for developing the cadre and one year of supplemental compensation for the members of the cadre, in addition to the regular salary paid by AOC, with the understanding that following that first year, defendants will be responsible for paying any differential accorded to the members of the cadre.
339. In the same Joint Proposal the parties agreed upon a schedule for setting up the private not-for-profit corporation proposed by plaintiffs and embraced by defendants. So far the court has been advised at an informed status conference only that the incorporation papers have been filed with the Department of State of Puerto Rico.

214 Every *214 other deadline on the parties' joint submission has gone by with no action that the court is aware of. The court is particularly concerned about budgeting and not less concerned about the proposed not-for-profit corporation.
340. The court will at this time take interim measures and pursue the path which it deems necessary to protect the plaintiffs' rights and take some of the steps proposed by the parties. The court expects obedience now. The parties are all on notice that should the court be disappointed in its rightful expectations, it will not hesitate to reach the ultimate issues raised in this matter.
IT IS NOW ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Partial Judgment entered on January 26, 1996, be continued in full force and effect with respect to all health care issues, and all orders set out in the Order Directing Partial Judgment be also continued in full force and effect. And it is further
ORDERED that the Joint Health Care Coordinator shall submit directly to the court, over her signature, and to counsel for the parties, as soon as feasible, a compensation scale for Correctional Health Program employees, which meets the criteria of the Medical Health Plan set out above, including compensation for "on-call" physicians. This compensation scale should be implemented for the present contracting cycle. And it is further
ORDERED that counsel for defendants, through the Attorney General if necessary, shall seek a reconsideration of the Comptroller's ruling on "on-call" physicians. And it is further
ORDERED that the Chief Health Care Coordinator shall submit to the court, as soon as practicable, over her signature, and shall serve on counsel for the parties, an itemized list, with the approximate cost of all vehicles needed by the Correctional Health Program. And it is further
ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order the Executive Director of the Correctional Health Program shall submit to the Administrator of Corrections a detailed schedule of the Program's security staffing needs, including ambulance drivers and drivers and escorts for transportation medical appointments outside the institutional setting. The Administrator of Corrections shall meet with the Program's Executive Director and counsel for the parties within five (5) working days of receipt of the Executive Director's communication to discuss the development and implementation of the medical cadres agreed upon by the parties. Counsel for the parties are directed to inform the court in writing of any progress or obstacles they meet with in the implementation of this agreement. The court deems this a matter of the greatest urgency. And it is further
ORDERED that within thirty (30) days of the entry of this Opinion and Order the Chief Health Care Coordinator will submit a report to the court over her own signature, and serve upon counsel for the parties, to inform the court on progress or obstacles the Program has encountered in the present administrative arrangements concerning payroll, services contract payments, acquisitions, bidding procedures, etc. The Chief Health Care Coordinator shall also include the Program's budgeting expectations, based on the information provided to her or to the Executive Director. The Chief Health Care Coordinator shall specifically address the budgetary needs for mental health care and the full operation of the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital, HIV + and AIDS triple therapy and Hepatitis C treatment. And it is further
ORDERED that within ten (10) calendar days of the entry of this Opinion and Order counsel for the parties shall inform the court in writing of the progress made in organizing the not-for-profit corporation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] The Court was concerned that the litigation positions of the parties, both of which opposed the expert witness' recommendations, might not result in a full airing of all the facts and circumstances relevant to its decision in this class action. Accordingly, the court appointed an attorney experienced in institutional reform litigation concerning prisons, John Boston, Esq., the Project Director of the Prisoners' Right Project of the Legal Aid Society of the City of New York (hereinafter "appointed counsel"), to assist in the development of the record at the hearing. Order, July 3, 1997 (Dkt.5532).
[2] In the order of their presentation these witnesses were:

a. Ernesto Torres Arroyo, M.D., the Medical Director of the Bayamón Correctional Center, is a physician licensed in Puerto Rico and is certified as a specialist in emergency medicine. He testified without objection as an expert in general medicine and in emergency room procedures.
b. Angel Luis Ramos Casanova, M.D., the Medical Director of the Ponce Correctional Complex, is a physician licensed in Puerto Rico and is certified as a specialist in internal medicine. He testified without objection as an expert in internal medicine.
c. Rafael Guzmán Fonalledas, M.D., the Medical Director of the Río Piedras Correctional Complex, is a physician and is certified as an emergency medicine specialist. Because the Executive Director of the CHP had resigned, the Chief Health Care Coordinator had also assigned Dr. Guzmán to the main CHP office to assume some responsibilities for all facilities. He testified without objection as an expert in general medicine and emergenciology.
d. Ana C. Bonet Rolón currently works at the Correctional Health Program as a Resources Consultant for the Chief Health Care Coordinator. She testified without objection as an expert in employment law, particularly in the management of personnel in the health care field, which encompasses correctional health.
e. Jorge Efren Ruiz-Román, M.D., is Director of the Infectious Control Program for the Correctional Health Program. He testified without objection as an expert in general medicine, infectious disease control, and epidemiology.
f. Lambert N. King, M.D., Ph. D., is the Medical Director/Senior Vice President for Medical and Academic Affairs at St. Vincent's Hospital and Medical Center of New York. He testified without objection as an expert in internal medicine, correctional health care, the administration of health care programs both in public institutions and for profit corporations, and in general health care administration within an institutional setting. His resume shows him to be a distinguished national figure in correctional health care. He has extensive familiarity with this litigation and the prison system of Puerto Rico, having served as plaintiffs' expert since 1979, see Feliciano v. Barcelo, 497 F.Supp. 14, 21-30 (D.P.R.1979) and having been a member of the Joint Health Care Executive Committee and a participant in its 1996 strategic evaluation.
g. Aida Guzmán Font, M.D., is the Chief Health Care Coordinator of the Correctional Health Program, and has held that position since 1993. She testified without objection as an expert in health care delivery and psychiatry. Dr. Guzmán's acquaintance with this litigation began in 1980, after the court entered a preliminary injunction. At that time she was Assistant Secretary for Mental Health, and she remained involved with prison mental health services until she left that position in 1984. Her lengthy testimony was well informed, precise, knowledgeable, characterized by a thorough knowledge and understanding of present conditions in Puerto Rico's correctional institutions and the structures needed to set up and maintain a health care services delivery system. The testimony of this highly credible and knowledgeable witness carries great weight with the court and suffuses the findings of fact made in this Opinion and Order.
h. Magali Maldonado de Oms, M.D., M.P.H., is the President of Health Insurance and Administrative Services Consultants Corporation. She testified without objection as an expert on the administration of delivery of health care services in public and private sectors and on health care delivery through insurance programs. She has worked with the Chief Health Care Coordinator since October 1996 on issues related to the Correctional Health Program, and both plaintiffs and defendants have relied on her advice in formulating their proposals. Dr. Maldonado de Oms has extensive knowledge of public and private health care systems and a thorough knowledge of the health care delivery system being implemented at present by the government of Puerto Rico.
i. John Hubert Clark, Jr., M.D., M.P.H., the Chief Medical Officer of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, is a physician licensed in the State of California and the State of Georgia. He testified, over plaintiffs' objection, as an expert in general medicine, correctional health services, and correctional health management administration and accreditation in the private as well as the public sectors. Despite his distinguished resume, Dr. Clark's testimony is entitled to less weight, and is therefore relied upon by the Court only exceptionally: nevertheless in some important respects he agreed with other witnesses.

Based on a weekend's visit to several prisons and a conversation with the CHCC, Dr. Clark had prepared a report, which was made available to counsel. Dr. Shansky and Dr. Aida Guzmán reviewed the report and agreed that it was generally superficial and inaccurate; Dr. Shansky: "either misunderstanding of what was going on in the system or an understanding that was extremely superficial and not fully adequate"; Dr. A. Guzmán: "not thorough enough ... did not cover all the areas and [...] he lacked the time to go into an in depth evaluation of our system"; See also T434-48, T450-51, T503 for Dr. Shansky's more detailed testimony.
Dr. Clark had concluded that "it is my opinion to a reasonable degree of medical certainty that the inmates incarcerated in the Puerto Rico Department of Corrections are receiving care that meets the minimal standards of the correctional health care profession." However, on cross examination at the hearing after having made a second brief visit to one prison and having listened to and read some of the hearing testimony, he abandoned this conclusion, conceding that "In the total context of the standards, the care is not adequate."
In general, Dr. Clark's testimony added little to the court's understanding. His acquaintance with the prison system was minimal compared with that of other witnesses who testified. Most of his testimony was either peripheral to the significant issues before the court or cumulative of the testimony of other witnesses, for whom he expressed much praise and little disagreement. Moreover, he expressed high regard for the testimony of Drs. Rafael Guzmán, Torres, and Ramos, and found nothing in their testimony that he thought was wrong. He agreed that Dr. Aida Guzmán, the CHCC, knows her program and stated that her leadership is "[s]econd to none." The testimony of these witnesses is far more useful and reliable than is Dr. Clark's.
j. William R. McNeill is an architect who works for Rosser International, a multi-discipline architectural engineering and program management firm that manages the Facilities Renovation Program. His testimony, not as an expert, referred to one of defendants' exhibits, which is no more than an estimate of costs for the construction and rehabilitation of facilities for the CHP. He also stated that in the past necessary funds have been available when needed.
k. The Hon. Manuel Diaz Saldaña was the Secretary of the Treasury of the Government of Puerto Rico, who testified without objection as an expert in financial management, public management, public policy on contracting, government purchasing, and the privatization process from the government standpoint.
l. Ronald M. Shansky, M.D., is a physician licensed in Illinois who is a consultant for corrections medicine and continuous quality improvement, a part-time surveyor for the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, and Attending Physician for the Department of Medicine at Cook County Hospital in Chicago, Illinois. He also serves as court-appointed receiver for medical and mental health at the District of Columbia Jail. He testified without opposition as an expert in general medicine, internal medicine, and prison medical administration. He also has had extensive experience with the Puerto Rico prison system; he worked for the Office of the Court Monitor during 1991-93 and in 1993 was appointed to the Joint Health Care Executive Committee. He returned to Puerto Rico and consulted with the CHCC and other CHP staff and reviewed medical records shortly before the hearing.
m. Vincent M. Nathan, LL. B., the court's expert witness, is an attorney who has served as special master, monitor, or expert consultant to courts in a number of prison cases. In this litigation, he served from 1986 to 1995 as Court Monitor and from 1995 to 1996 as a joint expert consultant to the parties, and is extensively familiar with the Puerto Rico prison system. He testified without objection as an expert in correctional administration and operations generally as well as monitoring and formulating remedies in prison conditions.
[3] Despite these discouraging findings, the National Commission on Correctional Health Care in 1992 had accredited the medical care programs at four prisons and provisionally accredited four more, with several additional prisons under consideration for accreditation. However, one of the monitor's consultants, Dr. Ronald Shansky, found noncompliance with at least one essential standard at every institution the Commission had accredited. During this investigation, Department of Health personnel provided the monitor's staff with credible evidence that other employees had falsified documents in support of accreditation. Plaintiffs' Exhibit 607, Stipulation Findings of Fact by the Court Monitor Regarding Actions Taken in Advance of NCCHC Accreditation Inspections (June 14, 1993), approved by Order of June 29, 1993, Dkt. 4504. The Executive Director of

Correctional Health then withdrew the request for accreditation for all Administration of Correction ("AOC") institutions, including those previously accredited. Office of the Court Monitor, Summary of Morales Feliciano Litigation (January 11, 1995), Dkt. 5532, at 194-95.
[4] "Prevalence" of a disease is the number of patients that have the disease during a given period of time. "Incidence" of a disease denotes the number of patients who become infected with a disease during a given period of time.
[5] Exhibits 331 through 390 highlight the difficulties experienced by the CHP in attempting to obtain an adequate budget over the past four years.
[6] Funds appropriated for the operation of the Correctional Psychiatric Hospital could be used for other purposes because the construction and delivery of the Hospital were inordinately delayed.
[7] Repeatedly, funds promised by the OMB either have never been transferred or a lesser amount than promised has been transferred to AFASS. See Exhibits 373, 375, 377, 380, 381, 383, 385, 386.
[8] Public contracts, once approved, must be numbered. All agencies have a set of numbers for contracts to track them in the system. In effect, the lack of a contract number renders the contract.
[9] Another blow to the Program's stability was the transfer of anti addiction functions to the CHP which thus acquired greater obligations without the wherewithal to deliver the services.
[10] Staff classified as "irregular" can, however, begin to accrue sick leave and annual leave after three months of employment, but they do not get medical insurance coverage.
[11] The Court notes that a dispensation can be obtained to hire personnel during the "veda electoral" period (September through December of an electoral year) under emergency conditions or to provide necessary public services. No evidence was presented to show whether or not an application for such a dispensation was made by the Secretary of Health, or why such an application, if made, was denied.
[12] The 14 persons lost by the CHP in 1996 because of Law 150 had not been granted waivers because OCAP determined that the professional services they provided the CHP were the same as those for which permanent employment positions were defined by Puerto Rico's personnel laws. Nevertheless, few positions were available in the CHP for those persons;. For those few permanent positions that did exist, the compensation package established by the DOH could not compete with the compensation available in the private sector.
[13] The Puerto Rico prison system has been receiving acutely psychotic patients from the street over the past few years. From July 1996 to June 1997, 423 acute psychiatric patients with incarceration orders were admitted to the Río Piedras State Penitentiary. This number represents an increase over prior years. This is also a general problem affecting all intake centers in the AOC system. Admission of these inmates cannot be refused by the AOC because they are committed by Commonwealth courts. When acutely psychotic patients are admitted to an AOC institution, they must be placed in emergency care facilities.
[14] The three main correctional complexes at Río Piedras, Bayamón and Ponce hold approximately 60% of the AOC's population and must process by far the largest number of admissions to the system: Sabana Hoyos (which is a health care disaster) is smaller and Vega Alta is an intake facility only for women who represent only a small percentage of the total population.
[15] In May 1996, the CHP attempted to purchase new vehicles with funds identified in the program's budget. In spite of the approval by the Chief of Staff, Mr. Angel Morey, to the purchase of new vehicles with funds from the program's 1995-1996 budget, and in spite of the availability of funds from that fiscal year's budget, the Secretary of Health required the program to purchase the vehicles with funds from the 1996-1997 budget, which would have had a detrimental effect on that year's budget. In December 1996, the CHP attempted to consummate the purchase of the vehicles for which the bid had been held the prior fiscal year. The dealer who had won that bid agreed to sell the vehicles to the program at the original 1995 bid prices. AFASS, however, refused to allow the program to purchase vehicles with a 1995 date, and required instead that a new bid be put out, which delayed

even further the purchase of the vehicles. In March 1997, the Director of the OMB again forestalled the purchase of the new vehicles which the program had been working on for two years.
[16] In 1993, the CHP contracted with CLENDO Reference Laboratories to provide lab services at Bayamón and Guayama. Because the service provided by CLENDO were satisfactory, the program requested that AFASS put out a bid request for laboratory services and CLENDO was the successful bidder. In April 1995, CLENDO notified the CHP of the need to renew its contract with CLENDO. The renewed contract was to contain some price changes. AFASS balked at renewing the contract and the CHP attempted to obtain AFASS' assistance in putting out a new bid request, while allowing the program to temporarily renew the contract with CLENDO. The contract was renewed pending resolution of these matters. From 1994 to 1997, however, AFASS carried a substantial debt with CLENDO. The debt eventually reached approximately $1,000,000, in spite of numerous attempts by CLENDO to obtain payment for the debt.
The Secretary of Health canceled the CHP's contract with CLENDO Reference Laboratories because she objected to increased prices (which were understood by Program staff to be reasonable) for some services. The Secretary directed, however, that the program could continue to purchase services from CLENDO at open market prices, which resulted in higher overall costs for the program. The Secretary of Health also recommended that the CHP contract for laboratory services through the Medical Services Administration (ASEM, by its Spanishacronym); although ASEM could perform the laboratory services, it could not perform the pick-up and delivery services that CLENDO performed.
[17] The Medical Care Plan requires newly admitted prisoners to be received at a small number of designated "regional intake centers" that provide a full range of necessary medical services. Medical Care Plan at III.A.10. The Plan requires "24 hour per day intake medical and mental health screening" (Medical Plan at ¶ III.A.10) and requires that screening to be performed "upon [inmates'] arrival." Medical Plan at ¶ III.B.11. A full health assessment is to be conducted within 7 days. Medical Care Plan at III.B.13. At present the regional intake centers are Río Piedras, Bayamón, Ponce, Sabana Hoyos and Vega Alta.
[18] The dangers of noncompliance with the Plan's admission assessment requirements are illustrated by the case of an inmate with a history of mental health problems who was admitted to Ponce on a motor vehicle violation charge at 10:00 p.m. one night in a state of drug withdrawal. There was no psychologist on duty to evaluate him, in violation of the requirement of "24 hour per day intake medical and mental health screening" to be performed "upon [inmates'] arrival." Medical Plan at ¶¶ III.B.10-11. Part of the psychologist's job is to screen new admissions for suicidal tendencies. There was also no room in the infirmary, where this patient would ordinarily have been placed for drug detoxification. He was therefore returned to the intake are, where he committed suicide the next day.
[19] There are a number of patients in the AOC being provided triple therapy. These are limited to those who were receiving the therapy when they were admitted to the system. These prisoners, however, are suffering from the same problems in administration of medication that is experienced throughout the system.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 605 F.Supp. 967 (1985)
Carlos Morales FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Carlos Romero BARCELO, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
March 20, 1985.
968 *968 Ivonne Díaz de Carreras, San Juan, P.R., Nora Rodríguez, Rio Piedras, P.R., Harvey Nachman, Santurce, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Marcos Ramírez Lavandero, Hato Rey, P.R., for defendants.
ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
On February 28, 1985, this Court entered an order requiring the Clerk to return all pleadings and papers submitted for filing bearing the name of Héctor Rivera Cruz, as attorney, since Mr. Rivera Cruz is not admitted to practice law before this Court. On March 1, 1985, the above-named defendants moved this Court for relief from this order or to stay the enforcement of it, pending a petition for mandamus to the Court of Appeals.
Having carefully reviewed the unique circumstances of this situation and the competing interests involved, the Court finds that less restrictive measures may be taken to retain the integrity of this Court without unduly prejudicing the interests of the parties Mr. Rivera Cruz represents as Secretary of Justice for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.
The defendants, while admitting that their attorney, Secretary Rivera Cruz, is not a member of the bar of this Court, assert that his name is included in pleadings and motions, and other papers, "as a matter of proper form" (defendants' motion, p. 2). They argue that although the Secretary is charged by Commonwealth law with the representation of the interests of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico,[1] his name is included only "as a matter of 969 protocol and symbolism, since as a matter of historical fact, [he] never engages in the *969 active practice of law before courts of justice." (Defendants' motion, p. 2)
While it may be a matter of historical fact that the Secretary of Justice never engages in the active practice of law before courts of justice, (the Court at this time is not willing to rule on the validity of this assertion) intensive research by this Court has failed to reveal a case from another jurisdiction in which a state attorney general or justice secretary was not properly admitted to the U.S. District Court sitting in that jurisdiction. The lack of precedent in this matter is not surprising, however, since it is almost inconceivable that an attorney would attain such an important appointed position in state or commonwealth government without having been admitted at some point to the practice of law in the respective U.S. District Court.
A U.S. District Court has the inherent power to admit qualified attorneys to practice before it. Furthermore, the U.S. Congress has given the District Courts specific rulemaking power to set criteria for the admission of attorneys. 28 U.S.C. 2071, F.R.Civ.P. 83. This rulemaking power may be exercised independently and separately from admission rules in other federal courts. In Re Matter of Roberts, 682 F.2d 105 (3rd Cir.1982).
In this jurisdiction, until very recently an attorney duly licensed to practice law before the courts of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico could be admitted to this Court on motion. At the present time, however, and since January 1, 1982, pursuant to the Local Rules discussed in our previous order, an examination is given several times each year covering the areas of federal procedure, jurisdiction and litigation, for those who wish to become

members of the bar. Prior to the last two offerings of this examination, the Puerto Rico Chapter of the Federal Bar Association has provided a thorough review course to help prepare for this examination.
Finally, it is clear that admission to a state bar does not carry with it the right to appear before a U.S. District Court, In Re Rappaport, 558 F.2d 87, 89 (2d Cir.1977), and the consequence of one's position as Justice Secretary for that state or commonwealth does not carry with it any greater right or privilege to so appear.
However, given the uniqueness of this situation, and the awkward circumstances produced by the inability of the Secretary of Justice to practice before this Court,[2] the Court at this time shall allow the pleadings and motions of these appearing co-defendants and of all those in other cases pending before this Court whom the Secretary of Justice represents pursuant to the mandate of 3 L.P.R.A. § 72, to be regularly filed, if such pleadings, papers, or motions are duly signed, and such parties are properly represented by attorneys licensed to practice before this Court.
However, the appearance of Secretary Rivera Cruz, in person or by any writing must, regretfully, be strictly forbidden until such time as he becomes duly admitted, as all other lawyers, to this Court.
WHEREFORE, this Court's order of February 28, 1985, is hereby MODIFIED in accordance with this opinion, and the Clerk is instructed to allow the regular filing of pleadings and papers of parties represented by the Secretary of Justice if properly signed by an attorney duly admitted to practice before this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] See 3 L.P.R.A. § 72, incorrectly cited by defendants in their motion as 2 L.P.R.A. § 72.
[2] The Court takes note of the numerous cases pending before it in which the interests of the Commonwealth are involved.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 672 F.Supp. 627 (1987)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. A. No. 79-4 (PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
September 14, 1987.
628 *628 Harvey B. Nachman, Santurce, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Marcos Ramírez-Lavandero, Hato Rey, P.R., for defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
Pending before the Court is the defendants' Motion to Modify the Stipulation on Crowding. That pleading in fact seeks modification of the order of this Court, dated January 26, 1987, approving and adopting as an order of the Court, a stipulation of the parties, filed September 8, 1986. The defendants' motion seeks relief under Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, specifically under subsections (5) and (6).
Section I of the order will discuss the background of the present motion. Section II will discuss the standards applicable to motions to modify injunctions. Section III will evaluate defendants' modification request in light of the applicable standards.
I. BACKGROUND
Since the inception of this litigation, over eight years ago, the issue of crowding in the penal institutions of Puerto Rico has been pervasive. The Court's first substantive decree, issued on September 5, 1980, addressed this issue by directing defendants to provide each person in the custody of the Administration of Correction with at least 35 square feet of living space.[1] Five and a half years after that decree, the Court entered its Memorandum Opinion and Order, finding fundamental constitutional violations in the operation of the Puerto Rican prison 629 system. At the heart *629 of that finding was the problem of crowding. The simple staggering numbers of inmates, crowded in facilities already sorely taxed by age and neglect, create a core of constitutional deprivation, from which radiate related problems of deplorable hygiene, rampant violence, disregarded illness, pervasive idleness and arbitrary discipline. The Memorandum Opinion and Order of March 23, 1986, revisited the issue of crowding in light of evidence made known to the Court by a variety of means set out in the opinion. The Court was dismayed to learn how little had been done to ameliorate the crowded conditions that had been condemned a half-decade earlier; indeed, the numbers of inmates, housed typically in the same aging facilities, had grown greatly, far outstripping the modest new construction and renovation undertaken in the intervening time. That this situation was intolerable, and would not be tolerated by the Court, could not have escaped the attention of defendants after issuance of the March 23 order.
At the time of that order, the Court appointed two monitors to assist in evaluating the conditions in the prisons of Puerto Rico, and to participate in the development of a comprehensive remedial plan to alleviate unconstitutional conditions. The first formal act of the monitors, undertaken with the Court's express approval, was to convene negotiations designed to address the fundamental problem of crowding in the penal facilities of Puerto Rico.[2] Those negotiations consumed a considerable period of time, as they required, among other things, the

compilation of accurate information about the size of housing units in all of the institutions, a process that proved to be difficult and protracted.
On September 8, 1986, over six years after the Court's initial decree on living space, the parties signed a stipulation on the crowding issue. The stipulation establishes population limits for each penal institution in Puerto Rico, and also requires that inmates be provided a minimum amount of living space. The provision of living space for inmates is to be accomplished in a phased manner; the only standard in the stipulation at issue in the pending motion is the requirement that as of December 31, 1986, defendants provide a minimum of 35 square feet of personal living space for inmates.[3]
The Stipulation was provisionally approved by the Court on September 26, 1986, and finally approved by an order filed on January 26, 1987, after appropriate proceedings pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The Court's order approving the stipulation directed that it be implemented immediately, thereby transforming the stipulation into an order of this Court, with full binding effect on the parties.
On February 27, 1987, the monitors filed their Second Report, evaluating defendants' state of compliance with the provisions of the Court's order on crowding. The report reflected the state of affairs in Puerto Rico's prisons as of January 26-30, 1987. The report was approved, and its findings adopted, by the Court on March 27, 1987, without objection by any party. In brief, the report documented significant noncompliance with the substantive provisions of the stipulation on crowding, including institutional populations in excess of those permitted by the stipulation, and maldistribution of population within institutions, combining to deprive individuals housed in certain housing units of the 35 square feet of living space to which they are entitled under the terms of the Stipulation.
After the Second Report of the Monitors was filed, plaintiffs filed a Motion for Contempt. The motion alleged 630 fundamental *630 and pervasive noncompliance with the terms of the stipulation, beginning with its first effective
date and continuing until the date of filing of the motion. Plaintiffs' motion sought a finding of contempt and the imposition of civil sanctions.
The Court convened a hearing on the plaintiffs' motion on May 27, 1987, at which testimony was adduced relating to the facts of compliance, and the circumstances surrounding development and implementation of the stipulation.[4] On July 23, 1987, the Court issued its Opinion and Order adjudicating plaintiffs' motion for contempt. The Opinion and Order first reviewed the procedural background of the contempt proceeding and summarized the evidence presented at the hearing. After these preliminary matters, Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law were set forth, supporting the judgment of the Court that defendants were in contempt of the Court's order on crowding. As a consequence of that judgment, and in order to promote future compliance with the Court's orders, a sanction in the amount of $50,000 was imposed; further, a prospective daily sanction of $10 per inmate was imposed, to be paid whenever the terms of the stipulation concerning maximum institutional capacity or individual living space are violated.
The July 23 order was not appealed from. Rather, after plaintiffs' motion for contempt was adjudicated, defendants had been found in contempt, and a sanction had been imposed, defendants moved for relief from the underlying obligation to provide 35 square feet of living space for inmates housed in the penal institutions of Puerto Rico.[5] The facts alleged in defendants' brief in support of their motion for relief essentially summarize the testimony of Dra. Otero de Ramos, the Administrator of Correction, which was the primary evidence offered by the defendants during the May hearing in defense of the charge of contempt.[6]
II. STANDARDS FOR MODIFICATION
Rule 60(b) of Federal Rules of Civil Procedure governs the modification of decrees and relief from judgment. Rule 60(b) provides, in pertinent part, as follows:
On Motion and upon such terms as are just, the court may relieve a party or his legal representative from a final judgment, order, or proceeding for the following reasons:

(5) it is no longer equitable that the judgment have prospective application;
(6) any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.
Defendants' motion apparently seeks relief under both subsections of the rule. At the outset, then, the rule should be analyzed to determine the standard to be applied to defendants' motion.
A. Modification Generally
Modification of an injunctive decree is extraordinary relief, and parties seeking such relief have a formidable burden in establishing that equitable concerns warrant modification. United States Steel Corp. v. Fraternal Association of Steel Haulers, 601 F.2d 1269, 1274 (3rd Cir. 1979); V.T.A. v. Airco, 597 F.2d 220, 224 (10th Cir.1979). It is, of course, proper that modification should be exceptional rather than routine, as any attempt to 631 alter the terms of a binding injunctive decree implicates the elemental concerns of finality, *631 the legitimate expectations of the parties and the preservation of judicial resources. As expressed by the United States Supreme Court, "firmness and stability must no doubt be attributed to continuing injunctive relief based on adjudicated facts and laws and neither the plaintiff nor the court should be subjected to the unnecessary burden of reestablishing what has once been decided." System Federation No. 91 v. Wright, 364 U.S. 642, 647, 81 S.Ct. 368, 371, 5 L.Ed.2d 349 (1961). This concern is no less valid when the injunction in question was entered by consent, since it is beyond question that consent decrees are judicial acts, as well as contracts, and are entitled to the same finality and deference as orders entered following constested litigation. United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U.S. 106, 52 S.Ct. 460, 76 L.Ed. 999 (1932). "There must be an end to litigation some day, and free, calculated and deliberate choices are not to be relieved from." Ackerman v. United States, 340 U.S. 193, 198, 71 S.Ct. 209, 211, 95 L.Ed. 207 (1950).
Of course, the present case presents an interesting hybrid of these issues since the obligation to provide 35 square feet of living space per inmate is, within this litigation, derived from both an injunction following a hearing (the September 1980 order)[7] and an order adopting an agreed decree (the September 1986 stipulation and order). In any event, the relief sought by defendants is extraordinary, and the showing they must make to obtain the relief is imposing.
B. Subsection (5)
Subsection (5) of Rule 60(b) embodies the long-standing common law doctrine that permits modification of equitable decrees when three requirements are met:[8]
a) the decree has been in place for a considerable period of time;
b) compliance has been achieved and maintained for long enough to diminish the threat of further dereliction; and
c) prospective application of the decree would work an injustice. This three-prong test embodies the fundamental rule governing modification of consent decrees that was announced a half-century ago by the United States Supreme Court. In United States v. Swift & Company, 286 U.S. 106, 52 S.Ct. 460, 76 L.Ed. 999 (1932), the Court reviewed a lower court's refusal to modify a consent judgment, several years after its entry and, it is worth noting, after defendants had established a course of compliance. The basic claim of defendants in Swift was that the decree should be modified to account for intervening changes in the market structure. Because of the controlling nature of the Swift standard as it relates to subsection (5), the opinion will be discussed at some length.
First, the Court observed the historic power of an equity court to modify its orders:
We are not doubtful of the power of a court of equity to modify an injunction in adaptation to changed conditions though it was entered by consent.... A continuing decree of injunction directed to events to come is subject always to adaptation as events may shape the need.

286 U.S. at 114, 52 S.Ct. at 462. After acknowledging the possibility that some decrees might of necessity be provisional, in that they involve changing conduct and conditions, the court enunciated the standard that should be applied on the facts before it. Two formulations are set out, and they are essentially the same:

a) [a] court must not abdicate its power to revoke or modify its mandate, if satisfied that what it has been doing has been turned through changed circumstances into an instrument of wrong;

Id. at 115, 52 S.Ct. at 462; and, in a lengthier and more revealing passage,

b) [t]he injury for us is whether the changes are so important that dangers, once substantial, have

632

become atenuated to a shadow. No doubt the *632 defendants will be better off if the injunction is

relaxed, but they are not suffering hardship so extreme and unexpected as to justify us in saying

they are the victim of oppression. Nothing less than a clear showing of grievous wrong evoked by

new and unforeseen conditions should lead us to change what was decreed after years of

litigation with the consent of all concerned.

Id. at 119, 52 S.Ct. at 464.[9]See, Fortin v. Commissioner of Mass. Dept. of Public Welfare, 692 F.2d 790, 799 (1st Cir.1982).

In summary, then, it may be said that subsection (5) relates to situations in which a party seeks to modify a decree, after a sustained course of compliance, on the ground that changed circumstances make further application for the decree unjust. Reduced to those terms, it is apparent that defendants are not in a position to seek relief under subsection (5). The decree has, as yet, had no application, in that it has never been complied with. Moreover, nothing has changed since entry of the decree to make its application unjust, or to transform it into "an instrument of wrong." The requirement that defendants provide 35 square feet of living space for inmates remains just, to say the least, and prospective application of the decree is fitting and proper. Any changes in circumstance averred by defendants relate only to their misapprehension of facts extant at the time the stipulation was assigned. That situation is not cognizable as changed circumstances within the meaning of Swift.

C. Subsection (6)

Thus, if at all, defendants are entitled to seek modification under subsection (6). As a practical matter, the content of subsection (6) must be construed as a residual exception, embodying any historic equitable ground for modification not otherwise specified in the specific grounds set out in subsection (1) through (5).
Although because of its facts Swift is predominantly a case iluminating the common law origin of subsection (5), the Supreme Court's opinion observes that equitable relief might be entered in cases of markedly different character. The Court defined the distinction as being
between restraints that give protection to rights fully accrued upon facts so nearly permanent as to be substantially impervious to change, and those that involve the supervision of changing conduct or conditions and are thus provisional and tentative.
Id. The effect of this distinction on the standard to be applied in the event modification is sought is not set out in the Swift opinion. It has been articulated, however, by courts of appeals, in reviewing requests for modification of complex and organic injunctions such as those involved in institutional litigation.
These requests arise in factual contexts different from that present in Swift in two primary respects. First, rather than a prolonged course of compliance, defendants seek modification at a time of significant noncompliance; second, rather than asserting that prospective application is unjust by virtue of changed conditions, defendants suggest that the decree, if applied, will not accomplish the objective sought. The latter contention is essential in seeking modification of injunctions, in light of the clear doctrine that "a decree may not be changed in the 633 interests of defendants if the purposes *633 of the litigation have not been fully achieved." United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 391 U.S. 244, 248, 88 S.Ct. 1496, 1499, 20 L.Ed.2d 562 (1968).

The leading discussions of the standard to be applied in the "provisional" setting envisioned in Swift are Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292 (7th Cir.1983) and New York State Association v. Carey, 706 F.2d 956 (2nd Cir.1981); see also, Mayberry v. Maroney, 558 F.2d 1159 (3rd Cir.1977). Ultimately, the decisions evaluating requests for modification in institutional reform litigation place heavy reliance on the "changed circumstances" and "grievous wrong" language of Swift. Nonetheless, because of the difference in underlying facts, the cases merit discussion apart from the basic holding in Swift.
Particularly instructive here is the decision in Duran v. Elrod, where the Court of Appeals reviewed, and affirmed, a district court's refusal to modify the provisions of a consent decree relating to crowding at a detention facility. The defendants sought modification on the ground that unexpected population increases had complicated the task of complying with the crowding provisions they had agreed to.
The court noted first the "extraordinary" nature of rule 60(b) relief, and the requirement that "a significant change of circumstance shall have occurred since the date of the final judgment to warrant its modification." 713 F.2d at 296, quoting, Benjamin v. Malcolm, 528 F.Supp. 925, 928 (S.D.N.Y. 1981).[10] Defendants failed to make this showing, even though they were able to establish unforeseen population increases. The court concluded
[t]the County officials made a free, deliberate choice when it [sic] agreed to settle this dispute and terminate the long costly litigation. The parties engaged in armslength bargaining and the detainees have a justified expectation that the bargain freely entered will be honored.
Id. at 296-97.
In New York State Association v. Carey (Willowbrook), 706 F.2d 956 (2nd Cir.1981), defendants sought to modify an order relating to the depopulation of an unconstitutional mental health facility. The court's order originally limited the size of alternative facilities that could be used to house inmates released from Willowbrook. Defendants' motion conceded the validity of the underlying objective 0907 depopulation of Willowbrook 0907 and argued that the injunction in fact hindered accomplishment of the objective by limiting the use of alternative facilities. Thus, at issue was only the matter of how best to accomplish depopulation. In this context, the court noted that the particular demands of institutional reform litigation, and the dynamic character of the reform project, require that modification be granted "with a rather freer hand." Id. at 970. Yet, the greater freedom of modification in this situation serves only the end of perfecting or improving the mandated route to the underlying objective. As the court in Carey noted, changes should be viewed more freely, provided the change "would not derogate from the primary objective of the decree." 706 F.2d at 969.[11]
D. Conclusion
The analysis set out above yields the following principles:
634 *634 1) defendants bear the burden of establishing that they are entitled to modification;
2) to meet this burden, defendants must demonstrate that, by virtue of changed circumstances, the decree as written will not accomplish the underlying objectives;
3) defendants must show, as well, that the changes sought will not detract from the basic objective, here the provision of minimally adequate living space for inmates.
Defendants' request to modify the Court's order on crowding will be reviewed in light of these standards.[12]
III. DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR MODIFICATION
The considerations advanced in support of their claim for relief are denominated by defendants, in the subheadings of their motion, as "unforeseen population increase", "substantial compliance", "1987 construction program" and "consequences". The foregoing analysis of the standards for modification should make it apparent

that "substantial compliance" and the scope of the current construction program are not generally cognizable as grounds for modification. Therefore, primary attention will be addressed to two following separate but related issues: (1) changed circumstances relating to the rate of increase in the inmate population; and (2) the potential adverse consequences that might arise from compliance with the mandate as written. Following that discussion, the extent of compliance and the scope of the efforts thus far to comply will be addressed.
Defendants offer factual assertions to support the claim of changed circumstances, and those assertions warrant discussion. The second ground, relating to consequences, can be discussed simply and will not require a detailed review of the evidence; accordingly, it will be discussed first.
A. Consequences
The core of the argument concerning pernicious consequences is that if defendants are required strictly to comply with the terms of the stipulation, they will be forced to loose on the community large numbers of prisoners not qualified for such release, thereby endangering the community and hindering the Commonwealth's attempt to curb crime. With regard to the latter point, defendants suggest that considerations of comity and commonwealth/ federal relations are implicated.
First, the factual basis for this position is dubious. It relies on the assertion that all persons presently incarcerated in Puerto Rico would present a danger to the community if released. That assertion is confuted by the testimony of Dra. Otero that the Correction Administration has insufficient halfway houses and other alternatives to confinement to handle inmates eligible for such assignments or diversion.
Second, the argument has an undertone of disingenuity, since defendants have known for six years that they are obligated to provide minimally adequate living space for inmates, and have, throughout, been delinquent in doing so. Now, having been punished, for the first time, for not meeting their obligations, they invoke the spectre of release of inmates. Of course, the civil contempt remedy imposed in this case is not a directive for release, such 635 as that reviewed in Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir.1984). Indeed, the remedy *635 here is the precisely approved remedy, one that permits defendants to choose their fate: either comply, or be sanctioned 0907 the option remains with defendants, as does the choice of means of achieving compliance. Defendants' recalcitrance has brought them to the point where, in the short run, release of inmates appears to be the only means of compliance. Had they not ignored other means of controlling the operation of the criminal justice system and the rate of incarceration, their options would have been more bountiful.
Finally, as for the effect of compliance on the sovereignty of the Commonwealth and the integrity of federalist relations, there must be no confusion as to the nature of the obligation in this case. Nothing in this Court's actions interferes with the efforts of the Commonwealth as to the enforcement of the criminal laws of Puerto Rico, or any other policy decision of that entity. The Commonwealth is being required to do only one thing in this action: adhere to the mandates of the United States Constitution. In the event internal policy decisions lead to the incarceration of individuals in institutions operated by the Commonwealth, the conditions of confinement must meet constitutional standards. The application of this principle of constitutional government to Puerto Rico scarcely interferes with the prerogatives of the Commonwealth.[13]
B. Changed Circumstances
The more forceful argument advanced in support of defendants' motion for modification is that the circumstances extant at the time the stipulation was agreed to and entered as an order have changed. Defendants' factual allegations in support of this claim essentially condense the testimony of Dra. Otero during the May contempt hearing. Importantly, however, certain critical elements of that testimony are not set forth in defendants' brief. The salient points of Dra. Otero's testimony, as it relates to the changed circumstances advanced by defendants, are the following:
1. When Dra. Otero assumed the responsibilities of the position of Administrator of Correction, she knew that the problem of crowding in the institutions was the central issue to be addressed, and she began immediately to

address it by developing plans for reduction of the population and expansion of available housing facilities. At least one of these plans was submitted to the Governor, urging immediate attention to the priority of crowding.
2. Dra. Otero was aware, early in her administration, that the internal planning efforts of the Administration had been adversely affected by inaccurate population projections.
3. The Administration of Correction commissioned a study of the correctional system in Puerto Rico, to be conducted by Multi Search, Inc. the report resulting from that study, usually referred to as the "Vargas Report" after the chief author, was completed in April 1986. The report predicted that the annual growth rate for the inmate population over the five-year period at the end of this decade would be 2.75%.[14]
4. Aware of past inaccuracies in population prediction, and concerned about the apparent illogic of the estimate contained in the Vargas Report, the Administration of Correction revised the predicted growth upward to 9.1%. 636 [15] It is important to note *636 that the basis for this estimate is not in evidence, although Dra. Otero apparently attributed the projection to the Planning and Development Division of the Correction Administration.
5. It is apparent, however, that Dra. Otero did not have confidence in the accuracy of the 9.1% projection, which is understandable in view of the haphazard nature of the projection and the legacy of inaccuracy that has surrounded the effort to project the penal population in Puerto Rico.[16] While Dra. Otero was working on the population projections that informed the stipulation, she was developing contingency plans in the event the actual rate of growth in the inmate population exceeded the 9.1% figure.
6. In September 1986 the Stipulation was signed. Dra. Otero was aware at that time that the population was growing at more than 11% per year. Moreover, even a cursory review of the available data concerning population increases in 1986 discloses that from January 1, 1986, to September 1986 the inmate population had grown by 600 inmates, an annual rate of 17.34%.[17]
7. By the end of December 1986, Dra. Otero knew that the actual rate of growth in the inmate population was on the order of 17% per annum.
This body of testimony does not establish changed circumstances. Indeed, it is striking that the circumstances that existed, in fact, at the time the stipulation was entered into are essentially the same as those that obtain now. At most, defendants' claim is that they misapprehended the facts at the time of their agreement. The evidence does not even support this claim, as it appears that the 9.1% figure either did not, or should not have, controlled the projections upon which defendants' agreement to the stipulation was based. In any event it is clear that defendants should have known that the population projection figure on which they relied was, in all probability, inaccurate.
Moreover, even if defendants misunderstood the underlying facts relevant to population projections, and did not properly assess the information available at that time, they certainly knew by the end of 1986 that they had drastically underestimated the actual rate of growth. Yet, they did not make a motion for relief from the stipulation, did not informally apprise the Court of the predictable problems in compliance, did not solicit the assistance of the monitor and did not seek discussions with plaintiffs' counsel. Indeed, nothing was done to seek relief from the obligation when plaintiffs filed their motion for contempt. Only when the Court issued its order of July 23, finding defendants in contempt and imposing sanctions, did they seek to change the order. This sort of brinksmanship does not speak well for the defendants' claim that their good faith efforts to comply were derailed by unanticipated problems in the growth rate, which necessitate the filing of the motion to modify.
One must be mindful of the content in which the stipulation was signed. In summer 1986, a contempt motion was pending alleging that defendants had failed, from the start, to comply with the September 1980 order concerning provision of 35 square feet of living space per inmate. The fact of noncompliance at that time is beyond question although ultimately the issue of contempt was never adjudicated. Thus, defendants faced the real possibility of contempt sanctions at the time the stipulation was signed. The four-month grace period from September to 637 December was the product or negotiation and conscious choice by the parties, and certainly the *637 December implementation date for the 35 square foot standard was not the product solely of defendants' internal

calculations, however erratic or unreliable. "The parties engaged in arms-length bargaining and the detainees have a justified expectation that the bargain freely entered will be honored." Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d at 297.
Finally, even if changed circumstances were present, defendants have provided no support for the proposition that, by virtue of these changed circumstances, they should be relieved from the requirement of providing inmates with 35 square feet of living space. The underlying rights of inmates remain fully accrued, yet denied, and will until defendants take their obligations under the order seriously, and fulfill them. Had defendants established at the contempt hearing that all reasonable efforts to achieve compliance had been made 0907 a showing they were unable to make 0907 they might have availed themselves of a defense to a finding of contempt. That defense, however, is wholly separate from a claim that the underlying obligations should be altered, particularly when to do so would postpone further the vindication of the rights of the plaintiff class.
C. Other Asserted Grounds for Modification
In addition to the basic grounds of consequences and changed circumstances, defendants urge on the court consideration of the scope of the 1987 building project and the degree to which that project has accomplished compliance with the goals of the crowding stipulation. Neither of these matters, even if established, warrants modification of the injunction. Sincere, thorough and effective efforts to comply with court orders are nothing more than what the law expects. The attempt to transform those efforts into relief from the underlying duty is unseemly. Indeed, the efforts made by defendants to comply with the injunction are more in the manner of defenses to contempt, and they were given plenary consideration as such by the Court in its adjudication of contempt. Those efforts will be considered here as grounds of modification to demonstrate that, even if relevant to modification, the facts do not support defendants' claim of diligence in attempting to comply.
The Court is aware, in great detail, of the building project undertaken by the Correction Administration in 1987 to increase dramatically the available beds for housing inmates. These efforts are hartening, and they suggest, it may be hoped, that the protracted course of inaction and dereliction that so long troubled this litigation may be at an end. Yet, building alone is not sufficient to constitute the form of resolute purpose and steadfast endeavor that shields a party from contempt, let alone provide a basis for relief from judgment.
The conditions of crowding in a penal system are the product of more than a shortage of beds, and there is reason to believe that active efforts by defendants on all fronts will be fruitful. Finding of Fact number 8 in the July 23 opinion found that "no coordinated efforts have been made by the Commonwealth to control the flow of prisoners into or out of existing facilities." That finding is beyond challenge, and defendants do not attempt to suggest it is erroenous. Dra. Otero testified forcefully about her views of the desirability of increased numbers of half-way houses and alternatives to incarcerations. Yet, defendants have not even suggested, much less established, that efforts to pursue such alternatives have been made. The contract for transfer of inmates to the Federal Bureau of Prisons remained unfulfilled at the time of the hearing despite its important role in assisting the Administration in ameliorating crowding and its attendant problems. Defendants have undertaken no efforts to arrange for temporary housing as an interim solution to crowding of institutions. The process by which the amount of bail is set by judicial officers and the possibilities for expediting the posting of bonds to secure inmate 638 releases, have not been the subject of intensive scrutiny and reasoned evaluation. There appears to have *638 been no systematic assessment of sentencing practices in the Commonwealth.[18]
The Court is not required to suggest to defendants the routes they should pursue to further their efforts to depopulate; yet the listing of these essentially rudimentary matters suggests the extent to which defendants have fallen short of establishing that they have taken "all reasonable measures to exercise diligence, effective control and steadfast purpose, achieving the prescribed goals." Aspira of New York v. Bd. of Education, 423 F.Supp. 647, 651 (S.D.N.Y.1976). That gap cannot be bridged solely by the construction of new and renovated housing space.
To be sure, the construction has greatly increased the number of inmates housed in Puerto Rico who are afforded at least 35 square feet. Defendants' assertions in this regard are skewed by misconception, however, and when analyzed fall far short of establishing a basis for modification, even temporarily, of the order.

When a housing unit is overcrowded every inmate in that unit suffers deprivation of the rights guaranteed by the Court's order in that none of the inmates have the 35 square feet to which they are entitled.[19] This fact should not be diminished, yet defendants' contention seems to take little note of it.
Moreover, serious compliance problems exist at several institutions, including the State Penitentiary, the largest institution in Puerto Rico; Ponce, one of the most dilapidated; Vega Alta, where all female inmates are housed; and Aguadilla, an old and structurally obsolete institution. Taken together, these institutions house approximately one third of the members of the plaintiff class. The Court is unwilling to barter the rights of prisoners assigned to the overcrowded prisons against those fortunate enough to be housed elsewhere and conclude that, on balance, all is well. The crowding order guarantees rights to every member of the plaintiff class, wherever housed, and it applies to every prison in Puerto Rico. The accomplishment of depopulation at some institutions is commendable, but the effort must be systemic in order to be effective, and its effects must be systemwide.
To the extent defendants have been conscientious in pursuing compliance, and have achieved it at some institutions, that fact is recognized by the connection between the prospective fine and the actual extent of noncompliance. To permit defendants to modify the underlying order, however, because they have attempted to obey the law and have had some success recently in doing so would exhibit disregard of settled legal principles and of the rights of inmates that are the subject of this litigation.
Projections of inmate population may be perilous. These perils aside, adherence to the long settled obligation concerning the provision of living space for inmates in Puerto Rican correctional institutions must not be postponed further. "A decree may not be changed in the interests of defendant if the purposes of the litigation have not been fully achieved." United States v. United Shoe Machinery Corp., 391 U.S. 244, 248, 88 S.Ct. 1496, 1499, 20 L.Ed.2d 562 (1968). In the end, indifference to law and nonchalance in obedience to duty is pernicious, 639 in its direct consequences on the *639 victims of neglect, and in its indirect effect on the quality of life in a society devoted to the rule of law. The order of the court approving the stipulation on crowding and adopting it as an order of the Court will not be modified.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] Critically, this minimum mandate was a temporary measure designed to provide inmates immediately with a modicum of decency in their habitations while incarcerated. The September 5 order requires, ultimately, that inmates housed in cells be provided with at least 70 square feet of living space and that inmates in dormitories be afforded at least 55 square feet of living space. Plans to accomplish these graduated objectives were to be filed with the Court within 90 days of the order. Feliciano v. Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1980).
[2] At the time of these negotiations plaintiffs' motion seeking a finding of contempt against defendants, alleging violations of the Court's September 4, 1980, order on crowding, was pending before the Court. As part of the stipulation plaintiffs agreed to withdraw that motion.
[3] Of course, to the extent defendants seek a nine-month extension of the time at which they are required to provide 35 square feet of living space per inmate, extension of the subsequent deadline for provision of 55 square feet seems inevitable although the matter is not addressed in the current motion.
[4] The testimony adduced at the hearing is described in detail in the Court's Opinion and Order of July 23, 1987, and need not be recounted here.
[5] The present case thus is far different from that reviewed in Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir.1984), where the court held that a district court, faced with simultaneous motions for contempt and modification, should resolve the modification issues before assessing defendants' compliance with, and possible contempt of, the decree.
[6] Indeed, the factual matters alleged in defendants' motion all relate to developments that occurred before the May hearing, and therefore, are addressed in the evidentiary record of that hearing, making the compilation of additional evidence unnecessary. In fact, defendants have not sought an evidentiary hearing for their motion. The

Court has concluded, therefore, that it can resolve the pending motion without an evidentiary hearing. A certain number of the findings of fact made by the Court in its July 23 order are directly material and will be noted; additional findings will be made herein.
[7] No appeal was taken from this judgment.
[8] Rule 60(b) codified the common law doctrines relating to modification of, and relief from, judgments.
[9] The final intonation of the holding 0907 the consensual nature of the judgment 0907 was a notable part of the Court's entire opinion. For example, in response to the argument that market dislocations had arisen since entry of the consent decree that was the subject of the modification motion, the Court noted
The difficulty of ferreting out these evils and repressing them when discovered supplies an additional reason why we should leave the defendants where we find them, especially since the place where we find them is the one where they agreed to be. 286 U.S. at 119, 52 S.Ct. at 464.
The rationale applies at least as strongly to the present case, where the defendants have been under the primary obligation concerning provision of adequate living space for six years. The difficulty of projecting rates of growth in an inmate population provides a powerful reason for not allowing the obligation of defendants to provide minimally adequate habitation to shift with the prevailing prediction.
[10] The opinion in Duran v. Elrod traces this standard to the "grievous wrong" language in Swift. This lineage establishes that parties seeking modification must show a significant change in circumstances, warranting modification, whether the decree at issue is entered in a fixed or an organic context as those situations are delineated in the Swift opinion.
[11] In Fortin v. Commissioner of Mass. Dept. of Public Welfare, 692 F.2d 790 (1st Cir.1982), the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit affirmed a denial of defendants' motion to modify, which motion was based on an alleged "change of law" since entry of the consent decree. After reviewing the facts and rejecting the claim of "change of law" the court assessed the line of cases that permit modification under the more flexible standard applicable to supervision of changing conduct. As summarized by the Fortin court, "the rationale of these cases is that when the relevant facts turn out to be different than supposed at the start, the decree may be altered to produce the originally intended result." 692 F.2d at 800. In Fortin, the defendants were unable to make that showing, and so modification was denied, even under the more flexible standard.
[12] Impossibility is also a basis for modification. In other words, if the terms of an injunction are impossible to meet, defendants are entitled to have the decree modified. The claim of impossibility in this context is one of permanent impossibility, and thus, is far different from a claim of temporal impossibility alleging that a particular deadline cannot be met. Such a claim is not a basis for modification although it may serve as a defense to contempt. In other words, if defendants suggest that the December date for provision of 35 square feet was impossible to achieve because of temporal miscalculation, that argument might stand as a defense to contempt. In the current case, of course, evidence on that point has been received and carefully considered, and it was rejected as a defense in the present case. Even were such a defense of temporal impossibility established, however, it would still not warrant modification of the decree.
[13] Moreover, although the Court's order is the product of federal constitutional considerations, it is worth noting that the current conditions of confinement violate commonwealth law as well. These laws are a forceful index of the values of Puerto Rico and suggest that in applying the requirements of the federal constitution to the operation of commonwealth institutions, the Court is not traducing on the prerogatives of the sovereign.
[14] The Vagas Report was introduced into the record of this litigation pursuant to a motion of plaintiffs, to which defendants did not object.
[15] Indeed, Dra. Otero testified that she was aware, in fall 1985, that the rate of growth far exceeded the 2.75% figure advanced in the Vargas Report. As a simple example of the unreasonable nature of the Vargas predictions, the report predicted a total inmate population for 1990 of 6,352, a growth of only 600 inmates from April 1986,

notwithstanding the fact that in the six months immediately preceding issuance of the report the population had grown by approximately 350 inmates.
[16] It is noteworthy that in projecting population in the late 1980s, allowance had to be made for the uncharted impact of determinate sentencing in Puerto Rico. The record does not reflect whether such allowance in fact was made. Inadequate assessment of that factor, alone, would substantially skew any projection.
[17] This figure is derived by taking the increase in inmate population for the first eight months of 1986 (from 5432 to 6060) and projecting that rate of increase for an entire year.
[18] The operation of the entire criminal justice system in Puerto Rico unquestionably is a prime element in the combination of circumstances that creates crowding in the penal institutions. That system has not been subjected to intensive scrutiny to ensure it operates appropriately in all its particulars in light of the limited incarceration resources available on the Island. Such an evaluation plainly is mandated by the pervasive crowding. In this regard it is worth noting that the Governor of the Commonwealth is a named defendant in this action.
[19] The prospective sanction imposed in the July 23 order applies only to each inmate housed over the number that may be housed consistent with the provision of 35 square feet. This matter was clarified in a recent order. Plaintiffs have argued that, since every inmate in a crowded dormitory is deprived of his right to 35 square feet, the per capita fine should apply to each inmate so housed. This argument is entirely logical, and has considerable force. For now, the Court will stand by the position announced in its order of August 14, 1987. Should crowding continue to plague the institutions, the sanction might be adjusted to account for every inmate housed without minimally adequate living space.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 697 F.Supp. 37 (1988)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
July 28, 1988.
38 *38 Harvey B. Nachman, Harry Anduze, Rafael Pérez-Bachs, José Fernández-Seín, Carlos E. Ramos, Santurce, P.R., Carlos García-Gutiérrez, Nora Rodríguez, Hato Rey, P.R., Ivonne Díaz de Carrera, Legal Assistance Clinic, University of Puerto Rico School of Law, Río Piedras, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Marcos Ramírez, Hato Rey, P.R., Dept. of Justice, Com. of Puerto Rico, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a motion by plaintiffs to close the Ponce District Jail (popularly known as "El Castillo") because of the continuing violations of the federal constitutional rights of all persons 0907 pretrial detainees and convicted felons and misdemeanants 0907 incarcerated at this institution under the custody of the Administration of Correction of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Defendants opposed the plaintiffs' motion and on June 14, 1988, the Court issued an order to show cause. Extensive testimonial and documentary evidence has been adduced by the parties during nine days of hearings held from June 22 to July 14, 1988. All efforts to reach a negotiated settlement have failed.[1]
The facts are not contested by the defendants except in non-significant details: there is no doubt, and there can be no doubt in the mind of anyone familiar with conditions at El Castillo that imprisonment there results in daily violations of the federally protected rights of the inmates. The defendants do vigorously dispute the remedy for which the plaintiffs pray. They argue that the Administration has invested approximately seventy-six million dollars in the construction of a new Southern Regional Institution to which the inmates at El Castillo will be transferred come December 1988 and that closing the Ponce District Jail within five months of its conversion to a historical monument would be an abuse of discretion.[2] They chiefly rely on Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. Kearney, 573 F.2d 98 (1st Cir.1978). The decision in that case, the plaintiffs contend, was predicated on such different facts that it is inapplicable to their request for equitable relief.
This incident is the latest episode in more than a decade of litigation in federal courts over alleged violations of the federally protected constitutional rights of persons incarcerated in the jails and penitentiaries of the Commonwealth. Plaintiffs have been conspicuously, almost routinely, successful in their claims for money damages and equitable or declaratory relief against violations of their procedural and substantive rights. This record of success in an increasingly complex area of the law cannot be soley attributed to the tenacity and the devotion of the highly skilled lawyers who have undertaken the representation of individual inmates or of the class at the request of the Court or on their own. We do not mean to substract a dram from the worth of the 39 fatiguing work in the field and in the library which counsel have expended *39 to secure success in court when we point out that the record in these cases establishes an appalling disregard by defendants not only of constitutional rights but of common decency in the incarceration of human beings, convicted or unconvicted, in Puerto Rico. Nor is this dismal situation to be attributed, as some have tried to do, to the vagaries of the electoral process. As we have noted before, governments come and go and the prisons only get worse: changes in government only exacerbate the discontinuities in policy which characterize the administrative chaos in the Administration's operations.[3]

This action was commenced early in 1979. On September 5, 1980, a preliminary injunction was entered by the Court dealing with only those violations that required immediate attention. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R. 1979). Some improvements have been achieved when those orders have been obeyed. Obedience, however, has been incomplete and intermittent. And the defendants now before the Court seemed to take the position that the preliminary injunction is the only source available to them in ascertaining their constitutional obligations to the members of the plaintiff class. Even the extensive findings and declaration of constitutional violations which we made herein in 1986, Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 672 F.Supp. 591 (D.P.R.1986), has not shaken the Administration's officers, employees or counsel from their lethargic indifference to daily violations of the federal rights of thousands of inmates.
By Order of March 21, 1986, the Court appointed a special master designated as a monitor to supervise the implementations of the preliminary injunction, Id., at 621-627. The Court then instructed the Monitor to proceed more as a conciliator than a supervisor; to reassure the Administration by assisting; to seek compromises rather than more litigation. Again a hands-off policy has failed. Very little progress has been made and every attempt to mend the rotten cloth only causes a greater tear.
The Court therefore finds that any improvement, and we reiterate that some improvements have been made since 1980, that has been made to correct the conditions of confinement in the system operated by the Administration of Correction has been a consequence of the bringing of this action and of the preliminary injunction entered herein. The Court finds specifically with respect to the Ponce District Jail that the only significant improvements there are the result of the preliminary injunction and the stipulation limiting the population of the institution, negotiated by the Court's Monitor. The improvements noted by the Court are the increase in medical personnel, the newer and more complete medical equipment, the newly refurbished kitchen and the decrease in population. All of these improvements, however, are compromised by the circumstances which we detail below.
Findings of Fact
1. Once again the Court must regretably find that the testimony given by members of the plaintiff class is generally more credible and it therefore deserves greater weight than the testimony of government officers and employees. The plaintiffs' demeanor, the directness and precision of their answers to friendly and hostile questions alike, contrasted sharply with the evasiveness and frequent equivocations of their gaolers and others acting in concert with them. Plaintiffs were generally, although not always, inaccurate about dates, a lapse which is easily understandable in anyone forced to spend months on end locked-up in total idleness, for whom one day 40 is as meaningless as the next. Plaintiffs *40 also at times could not allegedly remember the names of the custodial officers of whose conduct they complained, and the Court understands such selective forgetfulness as self-censorship for fear of retaliation. The only time the plaintiffs bowed their heads and mumbled was when asked, usually by counsel for defendants, to give the name of the officer who had denied them access to medical services. By contrast, one administration supervisor testified for hours with his back firmly turned on the Court mumbling his answers to the court interpreter. Very rarely could administration officers and employees come up with the specifics of the information solicited from them, and their answers were characterized by vagueness and the repetition of frequently irrelevant slogans.
2. The Court also finds that the records kept by the Administration and the documents generated by its employees are unreliable, to be scrutinized with care, and that they cannot routinely be given the weight to be given public documents produced in the day-to-day operation of a governmental agency. There are no apparent agency standards or procedures concerning the making of entries or marginal notes to entries in the many log books kept at the Ponce District Jail or anywhere else in the system. There is certainly no procedure for checking the truth or accuracy of the entries which are made in such books: there is no assurance that entries which should be made are in fact made. The sole principle on which these log books are kept seems to be bureaucratic self-preservation: to "cover the responsibility" of the writers. The same is true of letters and memoranda; they are usually intended more for the record than to communicate information or to carry instructions. One egregious example will suffice to establish the need to pick and choose with care. One budget document showing amounts

designated to carry out repairs at El Castillo was filed long ago with the Court in a compliance report and is now part of Exhibit 57, but the expenditure of the sums specified therein was never contemplated since defendants had already decided to build a new institution and not to spend the requested or apportioned sums.
3. The Ponce District Jail was constructed as a military installation in 1848, hence its popular name 0907 The Castle. The structure is totally unsuited to a modern penal institution and cannot house in safety the inmates confined there or the custodial and administrative personnel who should provide services for the inmates. The building is not structurally sound. Electric wiring and plumbing were of course not provided for in the original plans and have been added from time to time. Electric wires are exposed and ad hoc illicit adaptations are made by the inmates to supply their needs or convenience. Plumbing leaks in spite of constant repairs, and when repairs are not made, as frequently happens, sewage seeps into dormitories, puddles collect, drains become clogged. The roof shows ample evidence of attempts to seal it against torrential tropical rain, which nevertheless finds a way to fall on the inmates below.
4. El Castillo's structure includes substantial woodwork. The jail is a fire trap. A letter sent by inmates provoked an inspection of the building in 1986. A report was made and served on the Administration. Again an inspection was made in 1988 as a result of the hearings held by this Court on the plaintiffs' instant motion. Nothing has been done to correct the deficiencies noted two years ago. The opinion of the fire department officer who testified is that the building is dangerous for human habitation, which the Court finds to be true. Only a small number of staff know and have been trained in evacuation procedures in case of fire. This is all the more dangerous to the health and lives of plaintiffs because they are housed in dormitories with chain-and-padlock locks which must be individually opened with a single key.
5. The dormitories are not sufficiently ventilated. Heat is oppressive. Inmates spend the days and nights dressed only in their underwear shorts. The few ceiling fans are so ineficacious that inmates who sleep on lower bunks at 41 night frequently *41 place their thin plastic and foam-rubber mattresses on the floor to get some air. The inmates' personal laundry hangs from washlines inside the dormitories. The circulation of air is further impeded by the hangings which inmates place around their bunks to make privacy for themselves. (These hangings are forbidden by regulations which the Administration cannot enforce.)
6. Not unexpectedly, in so old a building so badly maintained it is infested with vermin: rats, cockroaches and centipedes abound. Fumigation is the responsibility of one guard who frequently delegates on his inmate helpers. He does not know what is in the agent he uses which is so strong that undiluted it burns the skin. The efficiency of his fumigations is demonstrated to his satisfaction by the fact that the number of dead cockroaches is greater after each use. Fumigating is carried out by sectors, claims to the contrary notwithstanding, and is not carried out in dormitories where asthmatic inmates understandably object to the strong fumes. Rat poison in pellets is used to control these pests outside the jail and is not used inside because it is poison. The well in the central court is the point of entry for rats into the prison, which have been observed to go up the stairs into the upper dormitories. One cat nicknamed Pancho is probably their worst enemy.
7. The medical director at El Castillo disclaims all knowledge of the environmental conditions in which his patients live. He only visits the dormitories when an inmate cannot be moved. He does not know whether inmates are or are not provided wih razors, toothbrushes and other necessaries for their personal hygiene. There are several inspection reports from officers of the Environmental Health Program at the Ponce District Hospital that detail substandard environmental conditions at the institutions. The opinion of Jorge Torres Soto, environmental health inspector, in his testimony was, and the Court finds, that the Ponce District Jail is unfit for human habitation.
8. New equipment and more health professionals have been provided to dispense health services at Ponce. There is, however, no sick-call. The inmates still depend on the good will of a guard or of another inmate to get to the medical services area. Permission is sometimes denied because there are not enough guards to protect the inmate on his short trip there and frequently for no reason at all. The fact is that access to trained personnel and medical facilities is determined by untrained and sometimes ill-disposed guards. At night an inmate must first get the attention of the nearest guard (who may be downstairs), who will then summon a sergeant to decide the need for medical attention. An epileptic inmate suffering an attack depends for help at night on the upper level on a chorus of his fellows who shout for attention on his behalf.

9. There are a few HIV positive and stable patients in the population. There was at least one case of an inmate who suffered from advanced AIDS-related sickness until approximately one month before his death. This man, formerly a drug addict, was abandoned to the care of his fellows in a crowded dormitory, where he deteriorated to the point that he suffered from convulsions, threw up blood and became incontinent. That he found charity and care from his fellows is as much to the credit of those who helped him as it is to the shame of the defendants. Six or seven other inmates who were housed at Ponce have subsequently died of AIDS-related illness. Two cases of meningitis in the Ponce population were reported by inmate testimony not contradicted by the defendants, who took care to bring evidence to show that detected cases of hepatitis were returned to the general population only after they stopped being contagious.
10. The medical record kept at the prison for the deceased AIDS patient did not contain a single discharge summary from the Ponce Regional Hospital. It is also uninformative and disorganized. The medical staff at Ponce in integrated by personnel appointed by the Administrator and others appointed by the Secretary of Health.
42 *42 11. The kitchen facilities at Ponce were reconstructed at a cost of some two hundred and eighteen thousand dollars. They are in generally good condition although there have been problems with the installation of some of the equipment and its operation. The repairs to the ceiling have not prevented a leak just outside the kitchen area, which may be due to leakage from the old or the new ceiling.
12. The stipulated maximum for the Ponce District Jail population is 457 inmates. One former warden testified that any number of inmates over 350 was unreal due to the conditions at the jail. During 1988 the population levels have been kept under the stipulated caps. In upper level dormitories the general deleterious conditions are compounded by a leaking roof. When it rains the inmates must regroup the double bunk beds to take some of them away from under the more precipitous leaks 0907 this maneuver, of course, reduces the available space. The conditions specified in these findings force the Court to find that the stipulated caps at 35 square feet per inmate, as computed for the whole institution and for individual dormitories, are not reasonable. The Court also finds that it must exclude Ponce from the delay it granted the defendants in implementing the requirement that the defendants must provide 55 square feet of living space per inmate when housed in a dormitory. The Court also finds that for months dorm population counts were purportedly kept under stipulated ceilings by counting beds and ignoring the bodies sleeping on mattresses on the floor.
13. The Hospitalillo or Little Hospital is a wooden structure built on top of the original building's second story. It houses some inmates who are actually ill and those who are in need of protection. The present incident was brought about by shortages of water in the whole of the District Jail, which became particularly acute in the Hospitalillo, where the Court finds that inmates were driven to draw water to clean their eating trays and utensils from the toilet tanks. From September 1987 until June 1988 intermittent water shortages resulted because there was not enough water pressure to reach the Hospitalillo or to adequately work toilets (those few which would otherwise work) in other areas of the prison. The Hospitalillo is the most dangerous location in the institution in case of fire because it is mostly constructed in wood and because the inmates there would have to be evacuated through the interior of the building.
14. After this motion was brought and perhaps not because the motion was brought, a new pump was installed that may or may not provide adequate water pressure throughout the institution. The fact remains that defendants ignored the problem of unsanitary conditions due to water shortages throughout the institution for approximately nine months. The Court is skeptical about the results of the pump installation with good reason. On June 22nd and 23rd, while the hearings were conducted in San Juan, the defendants caused three video-tapes to be made at El Castillo. The films made on the first day show unequivocal evidence that toilets were not flushing 0907 the defendants' producer-cameraman testified that there was not sufficient water pressure to flush the toilets in the sequences he shot. No water-works experiments were conducted the second day of filming because the pump had been dismantled to correct some malfunction.
15. The normal situation at Ponce is detrimental to health. Overall, about a third of the washbasing faucets and toilets do not work. And even counting those that are out of commission, they are not sufficient for even the present population of 410 considering that what facilities exist must be used for personal ablutions and washing clothes. Hot water has frequently been unavailable for use in the kitchen and laundry. Water coolers have been

installed within the last few weeks although at least three had been warehoused somewhere for months. Shower curtains have been provided and beds installed as the hearings progressed.
16. The old "calabozos" at Ponce are now styled isolation cells. They are still unhygienic cubbyholes used to 43 lock-up *43 those who need protection (who are understandably reluctant to be moved elsewhere) and to the
mentally ill. They scarcely provide space to move when the cell is locked: they are opened to allow inmates to walk to the single shower, which has drainage problems. A toilet was installed in the sixth cell a few days ago; until then the inmate housed there had to obtain permission from one of the five other inhabitants in the isolation cells to use a toilet. The fixings in one of these cells were destroyed by one mentally ill inmate. The only reason for the use of these cells is the administration's incapacity to provide protection for some inmates and to warehouse the mentally ill. The persistent misuse which has been made of these cells, where mentally ill inmates are abandoned for days and weeks and the healthy are locked up with nothing to do but pace the short corridor, requires that their use be conditioned by stringently limiting the time that an inmate is there, providing for medical supervision and excluding the mentally ill.
17. There is next to no recreation, active or passive, physical exercise or work for the overwhelming majority of inmates. Pretrial detainees are not given work. Television sets there are, some bought by the inmates themselves or their families. Against regulations, which the Administration is unable to enforce, inmates play musical instruments in the dormitories to fight the tedium of idleness. Classrooms are available and some vocational education takes place. Otherwise, there is only idleness for the vast majority. Security problems deprive the weak of the two hours a week in the basketball court, which is the most physical exercise that anyone gets.
18. The population at Ponce comprises convicted felons and misdemeanants, pretrial detainees, the feeble old and young adults, the well and the sick, and the mentally ill. There is no classification plan. The young adults are mostly segregated from older inmates. Pretrial detainees are comingled with convicted inmates. The Administration has no control over housing assignments which are changed at will by the inmates, sometimes at the invitation of friends, who take the newly arrived under their protection and provide toiletries and other necessities for them. At least in one instance one feeble old inmate depends for his food on his fellows, who sometimes cannot take a tray back to him because guards on duty at the dining area will not allow it.
19. The defendants strongly relied on security reasons for many of the grievous lapses from constitutional standards which were established by the evidence and to urge the Court not to order the jail closed down. The assertions that Ponce is inhabited by dangerous criminals whose release would endanger the public safety is not born out by the staggering ignorance demonstrated by the Administrator about the basic, general characteristics of the population at this institution.[4] One of the inmates who testified during these hearings was released before their conclusion upon completing his sentence. The gravamen of the Administration's argument is that at Ponce and throughout the other institutions the security of a large number of inmates (about 30% if the Administrator's estimate is correct) is threatened by the existence of two gangs organized into loose island-wide associations which are assigned responsibility for the deadly violence which shook the system a few years ago. The Court finds that the Administration officials lack substantial control over the security at Ponce and that they have abdicated their responsibility to give reasonable protection to individual inmates. The evidence conclusively shows that the decision to recognize gangs as institutional entities and to assign particular prisons to one or another association (or chapter) was made as a policy decision by the highest officers of the Administration, 44 including the present Administrator. The defendants *44 are now estopped from using their own abdication of their responsibility for maintaining internal order and discipline in the prison population to deprive individual inmates of their federally protected constitutional rights.
20. The Court also finds that, all protestations to the contrary notwithstanding, the Administration can transfer to other institutions within its control the entire population at Ponce without causing major disruptions. The number of inmates at present confined at Ponce would in any case be reduced if the Administration had only set up an adequate classification system and the Parole Board was discharging its duties.[5] That defendants are not performing their statutory duties is not a reason to oppose never ending clamor of plaintiffs of their constitutional rights. Answering questions by her own attorneys, the Administrator herself made it clear that even a peremptory, short-term order by the Court to close El Castillo could be dealt with. And under cross-examination, she admitted that there were at the time of the hearing enough spaces in the system to accommodate the entire population at

the Ponce District Jail. The Court notes with disbelief that, when pressed to state what measures had been planned to meet a catastrophic event at this dilapidated site, the Administrator could only refer to vague contingency plans such as calling out the National Guard.
21. There continues to be pervasive administrative chaos, as we have noted before, Morales Feliciano, 672 F.Supp. at 613-615, in the operations of the Administration. The Ponce District Jail is no exception. Once again the Administrator puts the blame for the indecent conditions in which the plaintiffs at Ponce live on the local superintendent. She now claims that the superintendent in charge of Ponce until mid-June 1988 will be charged and dismissed once she receives evidence to do so from the Court Monitor. This admission of supervisory incompetence is amply corroborated by the record. During his testimony the alluded superintendent produced documents to show that his hierarchical superiors knew or should have known about conditions at Ponce. Further information 0907 about inmates sleeping on mattresses on the floor because beds were not available, for example 0907 was transmitted to the central offices in daily-count reports mandated by prior, stipulated orders of the Court. And complaints about the incompetence of superintendents are not new, nor is there even a scrap of evidence to show that anything has been done to establish training, supervisory or auditing procedures to deal with such acknowledged incompetence. In this instance the Court finds that while some 0907 certainly not all 0907 of the improvements which have been made at El Castillo contemporaneously with the litigation of plaintiffs' motion had been planned months in advance, they had not been carried out because of administrative incompetence. Thus, three desperately needed water coolers were not installed when bought, two smoke detectors were allegedly installed in the dorms but no one could say where; the electric set-up for the water pump was so inadequately installed that the mistake could be corrected by anyone with minimal training. These, and other minor modifications, were carried out with almost farcical speed once the instant motion was brought and the order to show cause issued. This administrative incompetence weighs heavily with the Court in judging how far defendants can be trusted to keep their promises or comply with orders.
22. The Court has the gravest doubts about the assertions made by defendants that the prison being built at Las Cucharas 0907 the Southern Regional Institution 0907 will be usable by December 31, 1988. The architect in charge of that project could not categorically state so. Delays in prison construction have already caused delays in complying with prior stipulations and orders. There is no assurance that the regional sewage-treatment plant to 45 which the *45 new institution must be connected will be ready in time. To the contrary, the documents submitted into evidence strongly suggest that the construction of the treatment plant is already behind schedule. But we will hold the defendants to their word.
Conclusions of Law
Housing convicted inmates in the conditions set out above violates the rights of each individual incarcerated for any period of time at the Ponce District Jail to be free from cruel and unusual punishment. The building is structurally unsound and vermin infested; the lives of inmates locked-up by chain and padlock are at risk in case of fire and fire hazards are present and go uncorrected; the entire environment is unfit for human habitation. The defendants can only guarantee the security and life of large numbers of inmates by locking them up the whole day except at meals for the duration of confinement and then only by sufferance of gangs who have been assigned Ponce as their domain. This comes well within the constitutional commands, which forbid cruel and unusual punishment and which proscribe "more than physically barbarous punishments" since the Eighth Amendment "embodies `broad and idealistic concepts of dignity, civilized standards, humanity and decency ...' (citation omitted) against which we must evaluate penal measures." Estelle v. Gamble, 429 U.S. 97, 102, 97 S.Ct. 285, 290, 50 L.Ed.2d 251 (1976), and cases cited. The Supreme Court has held "repugnant to the Eighth Amendment punishments which are incompatible with `the evolving standards of decency that mark the progress of a maturing society[.]'" Id., quoting from Trop v. Dulles, 356 U.S. 86, 101, 78 S.Ct. 590, 598, 2 L.Ed.2d 630 (1958) (and citing to other cases).
The continuing interference of custodial officers, and frequent refusal of access to medical services is also, and by itself, Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104, 97 S.Ct. at 291, a violation of the rights of the Ponce inmates to be free from "physical `torture or a lingering death'", Id. at 103, 97 S.Ct. at 290, quoting from In re Kemmler, 136 U.S. 436, 447, 10 S.Ct. 930, 933-934, 34 L.Ed. 519 (1890). The Administration's employees and officers have amply

demonstrated, by their knowing failure to assure communications between inmates and medical staff, their indifference to the serious medical needs of all inmates, even those at death's door. The Court cannot avoid its duty to insure that the defendants comply with their constitutional "obligation to provide medical care for those whom it is punishing by incarceration." Estelle, 429 U.S. at 103, 97 S.Ct. at 290. "It is but just that the public be required to care for the prisoner, who cannot by reasons of the deprivation of his liberty, care for himself." Spicer v. Williamson, 191 N.C. 487, 490, 132 S.E. 291, 293 (1926), as quoted in Estelle, 429 U.S. at 104, 97 S.Ct. at 291. The requirements of justice can only be the more stringent in the case of the mentally ill, who by reason of their condition are even more unable to help themselves.
If these conditions are not permissible in the case of those who are incarcerated as punishment for crime, they can only be a greater violation of the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendment rights of those who are incarcerated as punishment for crime, they can only be a greater violation of the Fifth or Fourteenth Amendment rights of pretrial detainees to be free from punishment until convicted of crime by the due process of law. There has not been "an expressed intent to punish on the part of detention facility officials," Bell v. Wolfish, 441 U.S. 520, 538, 99 S.Ct. 1861, 1873 60 L.Ed.2d 447 (1979). The defendants, however have established a pattern of commingling pretrial detainees with convicted inmates subjecting them to the same regime and deprivations of liberty. If anything, pretrial detainees are worse off than convicts: they are thrust alone into a population organized into autonomous gangs. Those who are not native to the pretrial-detention catchment area for the Ponce District Jail are in particular danger. A large proportion of pretrial detainees are housed in the "security" dorms and thereby deprived of even the scant opportunities for recreation and exercise available at Ponce. By the mere fact of knowingly 46 commingling these *46 pretrial detainees with convicts suffering punishment for crime, the defendants also punish the unconvicted however unexplicit the officials' purpose to punish may be.
But there is more. None of the conditions which characterize the detention of the unconvicted at Ponce have an "alternative purpose to which [the restrictions] may rationally be connected." Id., quoting from, Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martínez, 372 U.S. 144, 168-169, 83 S.Ct. 554, 567-568, 9 L.Ed.2d 644 (1963). Nor if any such purpose could be divined could these conditions be less than "excessive in relation to the alternative purpose." Bell, 441 U.S. at 538, 99 S.Ct. at 1873. None of the conditions of pretrial detention at Ponce are, nor can they be, related to a legitimate goal; they are totally without a purpose and we hold that at Ponce the sole "purpose of the governmental action is punishment that may not be inflicted on detainees qua detainees." Id. at 539, 99 S.Ct. at 1874. And see Santana v. Collazo, 714 F.2d 1172 (1st Cir.1983), which discusses the due process and Eighth Amendment rights of those who are confined by the state while unconvicted. This case also holds that fire and general safety considerations are proper to the analysis of Eighth Amendment violations. Id. at 1183.
The Court of Appeals for this circuit vacated and remanded the pro se complaint of a pretrial detainee whose claims appear to be less grievous and more specific than violations established by these plaintiffs. Lyons v. Powell, 838 F.2d 28 (1st Cir.1988). Plaintiff James Lyons complained that he was confined with another inmate in a cell where he had to sleep on a mattress on the floor in close proximity to the open toilet and that he was in his cell 22-23 hours per day during a 27-day period. Id. at 30-31. The Court of Appeals held that both claims were sufficient to survive a motion to dismiss.
We have detailed in our previous opinions and orders in this case the legal analysis of each specific violation of rights and we will not repeat that analysis. We note the particular care that the Court's role in this litigation requires in the shaping of a remedy as part of our constitutionally ordained oversight responsibility: "In discharging this oversight responsibility, however, courts cannot assume that state legislatures and prison officials are insensitive to the requirements of the Constitution or to the perplexing sociological problems of how best to achieve the goals of the penal function in the criminal justice system [ ...]", Rhodes v. Chapman, 452 U.S. 337, 352, 101 S.Ct. 2392, 2402, 69 L.Ed.2d 59 (1981). But we are compelled to hold that in this case the conditions at the Ponce District Jail demonstrate that the defendants have been indifferent to the daily violations of constitutional rights inflicted on members of the plaintiff class. These conditions are so intertwined and inseparable from the structure and operation of the jail at Ponce that the peremptory and immediate closing of this institution would not be an excessive exercise of our equitable authority. Only our overwhelming sense of self-restraint compels the Court to allow the continued operation of this institution until December 1988. But we do so only if the defendants strictly comply with the orders we now enter to remedy the present violations of the plaintiffs' rights.

The preliminary injunction in this case, and the Order of May 20, 1988, allowing defendants additional time to comply with the requirement that they provide 55 square feet per inmate in dormitories, must be modified with respect to the Ponce District Jail. Neither the preliminary injunction nor the Order of May 20, 1988, are to be modified with respect to any other institution. As far as Ponce is concerned, the preliminary injunction will remain in full force except as specifically modified herein.
Federal courts have broad powers to fashion equitable relief once a federal right and a violation have been established. "Once a right and a violation have been shown, the scope of a district court's equitable powers to remedy past wrongs is broad, for breadth and flexibility are inherent in equitable remedies." Swann v. Charlotte47 Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 15, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1275-1276, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971). And "[w]hen *47 conditions of confinement amount to cruel and unusual punishment, `federal courts will discharge their duty to protect constitutional rights.'" Procunier v. Martínez, 416 U.S. 396, 405-406, 94 S.Ct. 1800, 1807-1808, 40 L.Ed.2d 224 (1974); see Cruz v. Beto, 405 U.S. 319, 321, 92 S.Ct. 1079, 1081, 31 L.Ed.2d 263 (1972) (per curiam); Rhodes, 452 U.S. at 352, 101 S.Ct. at 2402. In words which squarely meet the needs of the present occasion, the Supreme Court in Hutto v. Finney, 437 U.S. 678, 687, 98 S.Ct. 2565, 2571-2572, 57 L.Ed.2d 522 (1978), held that:
In fashioning a remedy, the District Court had ample authority to go beyond earlier orders and to address each element contributing to the violation. The District Court had given the [defendants] repeated opportunities to remedy the cruel and unusual conditions in the [institution]. If [defendants] had fully complied with the court's earlier orders, the present time limit might well have been unnecesary. But taking the long and unhappy history of the litigation into account, the court was justified in entering a comprehensive order to insure against the risk of inadequate compliance. (Emphasis supplied)
The Court also notes that here, as in Hutto, correctional officers agree that use of the Ponce District Jail should have ceased at least three, and probably five, years ago. Id. at 688, 98 S.Ct. at 2572.
The particularities of conditions at the Ponce District Jail[6] require that we specify a remedy fitted to relieve the present violations as we now know them.
The essence of equity jurisdiction has been the power of the Chancellor to do equity and to mold each decree to the necessities of the particular case. Flexibility rather than rigidity has distinguished it. The qualities of mercy and practicality have made equity the instrument for nice adjustment and reconciliation between the public interest and private needs as well as between competing private claims.
Swann, 402 U.S. at 15, 91 S.Ct. at 1275-1276, quoting from, Hecht Co. v. Bowles, 321 U.S. 321, 329-330, 64 S.Ct. 587, 591-592, 88 L.Ed.2d 754 (1944). In fashioning the remedy ordered today our only concern is that we may have fallen short in the measure of equitable mercy and our duty to insure that punishment is just. Rhodes, 452 U.S. at 352, 101 S.Ct. at 2402.
We have carefully examined the three opinions reported in the Charles Street Jail case: Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. Kearney, 360 F.Supp. 676, aff'd as modified, 573 F.2d 98 (1st Cir.1978), and Inmates of the Suffolk County Jail v. Eisenstadt, 494 F.2d 1196 (1st Cir.1974). Without calling our attention to or discussing the other two opinions, the defendants rely exclusively on the Court of Appeals 1978 opinion. That case, as plaintiffs suggested in oral argument, is predicated on an entirely different set of facts.
As is abundantly clear from the recital of Massachusetts statutory law found in the Eisenstadt decision and the conflicts among defendants in the 1978 Court of Appeals opinion, two different taxing and spending jurisdictions 0907 county and state 0907 were involved in the Charles Street Jail litigation. The Mayor of Boston, the City Council, the state's Commissioner of Correction, sheriffs, county commissioners were embroiled in what was obviously a local conflict which was summarized in legal terms by the Court in Eisenstadt, Id. at 1197: "[t]hough the jail is administered by the county rather than the state, the Commissioner holds significant statutory responsibilities and powers relevant to the jail[.]" The Administration of Correction is a centralized agency with jurisdiction over two

dozen institutions, it is part of the Commonwealth government, which funds its operations and has no conceivable obligation to obtain even the opinion of any other political body in the operation of the Administration 48 of Correction. The defendants *48 herein are the officers of one executive jurisdiction. This fact is of crucial relevance when the Court evaluates the defendants' ability to plan for and execute any remedial actions ordered by the Court.
Nor must the defendants have recourse to building or habilitating any new jails as was the case in the Charles Street Jail litigation. The Administrator of Correction admitted that the system has enough vacancies right now to absorb the entire population of the Ponce District Jail.
Not the least difference between the Charles Street Jail litigation and this case is that Judge Garrity could state, as we cannot, that "[t]he history of this litigation reflects a spirit of cooperation by the parties and their counsel with each other and with the court[.]", Kearney, 360 F.Supp. at 678. To the contrary, evidentiary hearings in this case have established a pattern of gratuitous, time-wasting contentiousness by the defendants, who litigate in vain and obstruct the discovery of the truth of facts which are, and should be, beyond dispute. The Court has frequently observed the uncontrollable expressions of amazement and dismay which overwhelm counsel for the defendants at the evidence presented in Court, frequently by their own witnesses. The Court's attempts to mediate have been rebuffed and the defendants have a poor record of cooperation in disposing of the many problems generated even by stipulated decrees.
We have given careful consideration to the Charles Street Jail decisions cited above and to Dimarzo v. Cahill, 575 F.2d 15 (1st Cir.1978). We have given particular attention to Martínez Rodríguez v. Jiménez, 409 F.Supp. 582, aff'd, 537 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1976). The remedy we order is well within the framework of those decisions.
It is therefore ORDERED that
A.
1(a) Not later than twenty days from the entry of this order the Administrator of Correction shall remove from the Ponce District Jail every mentally ill inmate at that institution, whether convicted or pretrial detainee. The Administrator, the Superintendent and the Medical Director of the Ponce District Jail shall certify in writing and under penalty of perjury that this order has been complied with immediately upon completing the evacuation of the mentally ill from the jail. This certificate shall be filed with the Court and served on counsel for the plaintiffs.
1(b) After the evacuation ordered in paragraph 1(a) above has been completed, no mentally ill person may be retained at the Ponce District Jail for longer than 24 hours while his transfer to another institution is processed.
2(a) Immediately upon entry of this order, every inmate admitted by the Ponce District Jail shall be medically screened before he is admitted to any area in which the general population lives.
2(b) Such screening shall be completed within twenty-four hours of admission unless it is determined by the medical officer who examines the inmate that a longer term of quarantine is required.
2(c) When a determination is made that such longer quarantine is required before the inmate is released into the general population, the medical officer who makes the decision shall make an entry in the inmate's medical record and sign and date such entry.
2(d) The Administrator of Correction, the Superintendent, and the Medical Director shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury that the orders included in this paragraph 2 have been complied with. Such certificate is to be filed with the Clerk of the Court before three o'clock every Friday afternoon until December 31, 1988. Those certificates are to be served on counsel for plaintiffs.
3(a) Not later than thirty days after entry of this order the defendants shall have corrected all the deficiencies detailed in the Fire Department's report of inspection dated June 27, 1988, (Exhibit 21(a)), to wit:

I. General

1. A plan of action for emergency cases must be established.

49

*49 2. All personnel must be trained in the use of the fire fighting equipment.

3. Smoke detectors must be provided in the dormitories. These detectors must be connected in line and with a control box in the guard area.

4. An internal fire alarm system must be established.

5. The emergency electrical plant service must be reestablished.

6. Refill empty fire extinguishers.

7. The fire extinguishers must be hung in visible and handy places.

8. Make all necessary repairs to the electrical system in the following areas:[7] workshops, storage rooms, laundry, store, offices and inmates dormitories. We list below the deficiencies to be corrected:

a. Lack of protective covers on the great majority of the electrical receptacles and switches.

b. Boxes with exposed electrical cables.

c. Lightbulb rosettes detached from or out of their ceiling box.

d. Automatic breaker panels without protective lid.

e. Electrical cables without the cover and/or adequate insulation. (bare)

f. Electrical receptacles and switches out of their box.

g. Electrical cable junctions out of their box.

h. Permanent use of electrical extensions.

II. By Sections:

A. Laundry 1. Provide electrical cord & plug with a ground connection to the Singer brand sewing machine. 2. Provide one (1) ten-(10) pound ABC (Dry Chemical Powder) Type fire extinguisher. B. Store 1. Provide one (1) five-(5) pound ABC Type fire extinguisher. C. Medical Area-Dispensary I-Dental Section 1. Discontinue use of nonapproved multiple electrical receptacle in which the following equipment is connected: Autoclave, AutoScaler, Air compressor and the Dental Chair. II-Records Section

1. Discontinue use of the electrical extension where the Elkay brand drinking fountain is connected.
III-Examination Section
1. Provide a safety cart for the oxygen cylinder and/or attach it to the wall.
D. Food Storehouse
1. Post No Smoking signs in this area.
E. Mechanics Shop
1. Check the electrical receptacle located on the wall along the eastern side of the auto alignment area since it displays reverse polarity.
2. Provide plug with a ground connection to the battery charger and to the yellow electrical extension. Note: The use of the electrical extensions should be temporary.
E. Electrical shop
1. Conduct repairs on the structure since it is in a state of deterioration.
2. Provide one (1) ten-(10) pound ABC Type fire extinguisher.
G. Armory
1. The oxy-acetylene cylinders must be placed outside the building on an adequate site.
3(b) The Administrator of Correction and the Superintendent of the Ponce District Jail shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury that these deficiencies have been corrected. This certificate shall be filed with the Court and served on counsel for the plaintiffs.
50 4(a) The third-story area of the Ponce District Jail known as El Hospitalillo shall *50 not be used as a dormitory or living quarters thirty (30) days after the entry of this order. This area may be used for recreational purposes.
4(b) The Administrator of Correction and the Superintendent at the Ponce District Jail shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury that the Hospitalillo is no longer in use as a dormitory or living quarters as soon as they have complied with this order. This certificate is to be filed with the Court and served on counsel for the plaintiffs.
5(a) The doors to the six individual isolation cells shall be removed within thirty (30) days of the entry of this order.
5(b) The medical director of the Ponce District Jail shall cause a medical officer to visit the inmates held in the area of the isolation cells at least once a day. The medical director or the person whom he designates shall ascertain that the sanitary facilities and the shower in the isolation cell area are in good working condition. If there is any doubt about the working conditions of the sanitary equipment or the shower in this area, the medical director shall so notify personally and immediately the Superintendent of the Ponce Jail and the Administrator of Correction. If the problems and deficiencies are not corrected within twenty-four (24) hours of their notification to the Superintendent and the Administrator of Correction, the Medical Director shall certify the fact in writing under penalty of perjury and cause such certificate to be filed with the Court. The Clerk of the Court shall serve any certificate filed under this paragraph on counsel for all the parties and the Court Monitor.
6(a) Not later than ten (10) days after entry of this order the Administrator of Correction, the Superintendent and the Medical Director of the Ponce District Jail shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury that they have devised a plan to establish sick-call procedures that insure that all inmates at the Ponce District Jail have access once a day to a qualified person under the Medical Director's supervision. The plan shall be appended to the certificate, which shall be filed with the Court and served on counsel for plaintiffs and the Court Monitor.

6(b) The plan required by paragraph 6(a) above shall also specify the measures to be taken by the custodial staff and the medical personnel to handle emergencies between 9:00 P.M. and 8:00 A.M. on week-days and between 12:00 P.M. on Saturdays thru 8:00 A.M. on Mondays.
6(c) The plan required by paragraphs 6(a) and (b) above shall be fully implemented within twenty days of the entry of this order. The Medical Director and the Superintendent of the Ponce Jail and the Administrator of Correction shall certify every week in writing under penalty of perjury that the plan has been complied with and this certificate shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court every Friday before 3:00 P.M. and served on counsel for the plaintiffs.
7) The Superintendent of the Ponce District Jail and the Administrator of Correction shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury every time that there is inadequate water pressure for longer than three hours to use any cooking, cleaning, washing or sanitary facility or equipment at the Ponce District Jail. These certificates shall be filed with the Court and served on counsel for the plaintiffs and the Court Monitor within forty-eight (48) hours of the event and shall describe the areas affected and the duration of time during which there was insufficient water pressure.
8) After August 31, 1988, every inmate at the Ponce District Jail shall be provided with the opportunity to participate in active physical recreation during a period of at least three (3) hours twice a week.
9(a) The Superintendent of the Ponce District Jail and the Administrator of Correction shall determine the number of custodial officers needed to provide adequate protection to every person confined at the Ponce District Jail at all times, including mealtimes, recreation and medical visits. The Superintendent and the Administrator shall devise a plan stating the number and posting of custodial officers for every shift which they deem to be sufficient for this purpose.
51 *51 9(b) The Superintendent and the Administrator shall certify every week, in writing under penalty of perjury, that the schedule required in paragraph 9(a) has been complied with. This certificate is to be filed every Friday before 3:00 P.M. with the Clerk of the Court.
9(c) The plan described in paragraph 9(a) and the schedule described in prgraph 9(b) shall be filed and kept under seal for the exclusive use of the Court and the Court Monitors.
B.
1(a) The population at the Ponce District Jail after August 31, 1988, shall not exceed the rated capacity of 292 for the whole institution.
1(b) Population figures shall continue to be reported as previously ordered by the Court.
1(c) After August 31, 1988, the fine for every inmate in excess of the ordered capacity shall be fifty dollars ($50.00) per day for each inmate in excess of capacity.
1(d) If the population limits specified in this part "B" of this order have not been reached by September 30, 1988, the defendants, their officers, attorneys, agents, employees and all other persons acting in concert with them are forever enjoined from admitting to the Ponce District Jail or holding there any pretrial detainee, convict or any person committed to the custody of the Administration of Correction of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, which person was not already confined at the Ponce District Jail on the day this order was entered.
1(e) If the population limits specified in this part "B" of this order are not reached by September 30, 1988, the defendants, their officers, attorneys, agents, employees and all persons acting in concert with them are hereby forever enjoined from incarcerating or holding at the Ponce District Jail any pretrial detainee after October 30, 1988, or any young adult after November 15, 1988, or any person at all after November 30, 1988.

C.
If there is non-compliance with any part of part "A" of this order, the Court upon such notice as it deems proper and after hearing may advance the dates set out in part "B" of this order to evacuate the inmate population from the Ponce District Jail.
D.
Any person required by this order to make a certificate who is not able to make such certificate shall certify in writing under penalty of perjury the reasons for which he/she is unable to do so and file and serve such negative certificate as he/she is required by the order to file the certificate which he/she would otherwise make.
E.
The defendants, their successors in office, their attorneys, agents, officers, employees and all persons acting in concert with them are forever enjoined from using the premises now known as the Ponce District Jail after December 31, 1988, to confine any person committed to their custody.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] On several occasions the Court met in chambers with counsel for the plaintiffs and defendants and pressed on the parties the convenience to all of reaching an agreement which would dispose of the matters here at issue in a planned and organized manner on a schedule which the defendants could keep, the plaintiffs accept and the Court approve. Several days into the hearings the Court in chambers informed counsel for the defendants that we took the dimmest view of their ability to controvert the plaintiffs' evidence and that the Court would indeed close El Castillo if the conditions of confinement were not within reasonable divergence from constitutional standards by September 15, 1988. Attorneys for the defendants, on Thursday, July 7, 1988, requested until early the next week to come up with a counter-proposal. The delay was necessary, counsel asserted, to confer with codefendant the Governor of Puerto Rico, who was away from the Island. The only news the Court has had of counsel's conference was in the press: a personal attack on the Court by the Governor and a distorted account by the Administrator of Correction of the conference in chambers as reported to her by counsel.
[2] Only five million dollars have been actually appropriated for this purpose. The rest of the sum was raised by a mortgage which must be paid for out of the Administration's operational budget during the next thirty years.
[3] After the change in government, which resulted from the 1984 general elections in Puerto Rico, several months elapsed before the incumbent Administrator of Correction took office on June 10, 1985, several months after the resignation of the prior Administrator. This change was reflected in the proceedings in this action by a change of counsel for plaintiffs. At that time the Court stayed its hand and held plaintiffs at bay to allow the new administrators time to find their bearings. It is perhaps ironic, perhaps an indication of defendants' mind-set, that they now complain that the Court has been slow to act.
[4] The Administrator did not know how many inmates at Ponce were misdemeanants, how many were classified as in medium or minimum custody, how many were due to appear before the Parole Board or how many were young adults. The conclusion that the population is made up of dangerous criminals is not sustained by anything except ignorance of the facts.
[5] Referrals to the Parole Board was one of the procedures which the Administrator mentioned as one of her options if the Court ordered the Ponce District Jail closed. The Court's question about why this was not being done now went unanswered.
[6] We intimate no opinion on whether any other institution has reached the level of constitutional violations prevalent at the Ponce District Jail.

[7] All work on the electrical system must be performed by an authorized master electrician.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 704 F.Supp. 16 (1988)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
December 30, 1988.
Harvey B. Nachman, Harry Anduze, Santurce, P.R., Carlos García-Gutiérrez, Hato Rey, P.R., Rafael PérezBachs, San Juan, P.R., José Fernández-Seín, Carlos E. Ramos, Santurce, P.R., Nora Rodríguez, Hato Rey, P.R., and Ivonne Díaz de Carrera, Legal Assistance Clinic, University of Puerto Rico School of Law, Río Piedras, P.R., for plaintiffs.
17 *17 Marcos Ramírez, Hato Rey, P.R., and Dept. of Justice, Com. of Puerto Rico, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
The matter is before this Court on a motion for contempt filed by Domingo Grajales Cardona, a member of plaintiffs' class, against Mercedes Otero de Ramos, Administrator of the Correction Administration of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico; Captain Domingo Alvarez, Deputy Administrator for Security Affairs of the same agency; Sergeant Benito Torres; Heriberto Torres and José Ramón García, custody officers employed by the Correction Administration. Mr. Grajales ("complainant") claims that these individuals have failed to comply with various outstanding orders issued by the Court which prohibit retaliation against members of the plaintiffs' class who appear as witnesses or otherwise communicate with the Court in the exercise of their constitutional rights.
A hearing which lasted three days was held to ascertain if the contemptuous conduct had taken place. The action against Ms. Otero was dismissed in open court after the complainant failed to meet the standard of proof required in civil contempt proceedings.[1] A similar request by the other respondents was denied.
Much of the evidence submitted by the parties consisted of oral testimony. Some documentary evidence was also presented. After observing the demeanor of the witnesses and taking into consideration the other evidence submitted, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
Findings of Fact
1. On September 13, 1988, two attorneys representative of plaintiffs' class, Harvey B. Nachman and Carlos Ramos González, conferred with Mr. Domingo Grajales Cardona at the Guayama Regional Detention Center, "Annex 292". The interview was conducted inside the dormitory area of the complainant while he remained in his individual cell. This area is identified as Building Four, Section C. The interview lasted from 8:45 P.M. to 10:00 P.M.
2. Messrs. Nachman and Ramos visited Grajales in response to a pro se complaint drafted by the latter and addressed to this Court. The complaint raised several issues concerning the conditions of confinement at the "Guayama Annex". On August 24, 1988, the Court referred a copy of the complaint to the law office of Mr. Nachman, who is the lead counsel in a group comprising seven attorneys that represent the prisoners' class.

3. Access into the prison, and the corresponding individual cells, was obtained by the aforementioned attorneys pursuant to an outstanding order of the Court issued on January 3, 1980, which authorized such entry.[2] These visits have been performed on numerous occasions since the issuance of the order.
4. The visit of September 13, 1988, was widely commented on by the custody officers of the Guayama prison. Following standard procedures, the visit was registered in the "Lawyers Log Book", usually kept at the entrance of the institution (Exhibit 2). This particular visit was also annotated in the "Novelty Log Book" also kept at the institution (Exhibit B(2)). Both entries identified the name of the above mentioned attorneys. The latter also identified the dormitory area which was visited by them, that is, Building Four, Section C. The annotation also served as notice and source of knowledge about the visit to other custody officers, including Torres, García and Martínez.
18 *18 5. On the next day following the visit, that is, September 14, 1988, at or about 8:30 A.M., Sergeant Benito Torres, officers Heriberto Martínez and José Ramón García removed the complainant from his cell. Although initially told that he was to be taken to the admissions area, he was taken to a recreation area known as the "cajones" ("the boxes"). These are open ceiling recreational facilities with dimensions of approximately 20' × 30' × 8'. Once in front of the entrance of one of the "cajones", Grajales was handcuffed. Promptly thereafter, Sergeant Torres grabbed him while officer Martínez punched him in the stomach and officer García slapped his face. In the meantime, he was told phrases such as "charlatán", "here we are in command", "we do not work under pressure". Once beaten, he was pushed into the "box" and locked inside it. Officer García obtained a "tear gas shot gun" from an unidentified custody officer assigned to a special force unit. García fired tear gas cannisters against the complainant. The bombs exploded near him, and although he was not burned by them, the complainant suffered smoke inhalation and experienced the pain associated with it. He further suffered the pain and anguish caused by being hit on the stomach and slapped on the face.
6. Tear gas bombs are usually kept on hand by members of the aforestated "special forces" of the security staff of the Administration of Correction. The distribution of these "bombs" to members of the "special forces" is not necessarily registered in the official logs kept for this purpose at the Armory of the institution (Exhibit I).
7. The complainant was left alone at the "box" for several minutes. While inside, he was able to pick up several components of the cannisters and bomb shells fired against him (Exhibit 1). He was then removed from the area and taken back to his cell by the same three custody officers. While being placed in his cell, defendant García told complainant that "we are acting upon orders issued by Domingo Alvarez". This statement was also heard by other inmates next to Grajales' cell.
8. Mr. Domingo Alvarez is the Deputy Administrator for Security Affairs of the Administration of Correction. He is a member of the Police Department of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and is presently on leave of absence without pay. He works under the supervision of the Administrator of Correction and also responds to the Director of the Penal Institution Program. The latter is the division in charge of the daily supervision of the entire correctional system. Mr. Alvarez has been entrusted with responsibilities that include inter alia, direction of the "academy" for new custody officers and the recruitment, evaluation and promotions of these. He is also accountable for the design and support of all security plans for the Administration of Correction. Respondent Alvarez also provides special security assistance whenever a mass transfer of inmates takes place. He knows complainant Grajales, having met him due to several requests for prison transfers made by the latter. Alvarez opines that the complainant is the leader of a prisoners' group known as "the Grajales".
9. Sergeant Benito Torres, officers Heriberto Martínez and José Ramón García personally known Mr. Grajales. To all of them he is considered "dangerous"; to García he is also an inmate who is "difficult to manage" and who has "bad attitudes".
10. Complainant is considered a "jail-house lawyer" by respondents, as well as by his fellow inmates. He has filed several pro se complaints at previous times before this Court and has drafted others on behalf of fellow inmates.

Conclusions of Law
This Court has issued several written and oral protective orders to prevent reprisals by defendants, its agents, servants and employees against inmates that seek the vindication of their constitutional rights. See Order of May 30, 1980 (docket # 254), January 21, 1981 (docket # 542), June 26, 1984 (docket # 807), and July 9, 1984 19 (docket # 809). Our Order of January 21, 1981, specifically restrained "all employees, *19 agents (and) servants of the Administration of Corrections" from "taking reprisals" against any "inmate who testifies in this case as well as those who are interviewed by plaintiffs' attorneys ... based solely on the fact that he/she has testified or has been interviewed for these proceedings". It further ordered the Administration of Correction to circulate copies of the order among the Superintendents of each penal institution or prison camp under its jurisdiction, and to orally advise each superintendent of its contents.
Every order granting an injunction is "binding upon the parties to the action, their officers, agents, servants (and) employees...." Fed.R.Civ.P. 65(d). Although it is not necessary to establish that a party's employees had actual notice of the injunction in order for them to be bound by it, Shakman v. Democratic Organization of Cook County, 533 F.2d 344, 352 (7th Cir.1976), some notice may nevertheless be required by due process. See Moore's Federal Practice, Vol. 7 0907 Part 2, pp. 65-156 through 65-158.
Here, defendants were in all probability placed on actual notice of the January 21 Order's terms by its requirement that it be circulated among the Superintendents of all penal institutions and prison camps. Since the order specifically stated that it applied to "all employees" of the Administration of Correction, the Superintendents were under an obligation to notify their subordinates by posting or otherwise, and presumably did so. Under these circumstances, it is so highly improbable that defendants were unaware of our order that actual notice can be reasonably inferred. Cf. Hill v. United States, 33 F.2d 489, 491 (8th Cir.1929). In any event, even if there was no actual notice, there was sufficient constructive notice, given the terms of the order, to satisfy due process.
Civil contempt proceedings are an appropriate vehicle when a victorious party secures the full relief granted by the Court. Gompers v. Bucks Stove and Range Co., 221 U.S. 418, 31 S.Ct. 492, 55 L.Ed. 797 (1911). Although willfulness is not required for a finding of civil contempt, civil contempt may be based on willful behavior. United States v. Laurins, 857 F.2d 529 (9th Cir.1988).
The standard of proof in civil contempt proceedings is that of "clear and convincing evidence". United States v. Rizzo, supra. To the Court, the events that transpired during the morning of September 13, 1988, occurred as alleged by the complainant and for the motives asserted. The staunch and extensive cross-examination to which defendants subjected Mr. Grajales, as well as the witnesses that testified on his behalf, only served to further and corroborate his complaint. The evidence presented was in the Court's opinion "clear and convincing". These witnesses were well articulated and their testimony flawless. The same cannot be said as to the witnesses on behalf of the Administration of Correction. Their theory of the case rested on the notion that nothing unusual happened during the morning of September 13, 1988. Complainant's allegations, they state, were "fabricated" to protect himself from an alleged seizure carried out on September 12, 1988, which produced an illegal "home made" weapon taken from Mr. Grajales. Although the investigation of said incident was conducted and completed on that same day, criminal charges were not filed until twenty eight days after the alleged criminal conduct took place and after the commencement of this hearing. These circumstances raise considerable doubts, to say the least, as to respondents' theory.
The incident of the tear gas bombs exposes even further the lack of candor on the part of respondents. Witnesses, including the very respondents, testified that the only persons who carry tear gas weapons into the institutions of the Administration of Correction are the officers of the Tactical Operations Unit of the Police of 20 Puerto Rico.[3] On September 13, 1988, they were not called into action at Guayama to help *20 squelch a riot or any other similar major disturbance. There is evidence on record that at the Guayama Institution there is a secured room or armory where firearms and other types of weapons are kept for use by the penal guards. There is an officer in charge of said room, who must make an entry into a log book every time a firearm or weapon is retrieved or returned by a penal guard. In said armory there are weapons of the type that fire tear gas bombs.

Although tear gas bombs were fired inside Annex 292 on September 13,[4] there is no entry in the log book of the armory reflecting the delivery or return of any weapon to a penal guard on said date or on prior subsequent dates. (Exhibit I).
Sanctions in civil contempt proceedings may be employed for either or both of two purposes: to coerce defendants into compliance with the Court's order, and to compensate the complainant for losses sustained. United States v. Mine Workers of America, 330 U.S. 258, 303-304, 67 S.Ct. 677, 701, 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947); Local 28 of Sheet Metal Workers v. E.E.O.C., 478 U.S. 421, 106 S.Ct. 3019, 3033, 92 L.Ed.2d 344 (1986). In civil contempt proceedings the punishment is remedial and for the benefit of the complainant. Gompers v. Bucks Stove and Range Co., supra; Hicks ex rel. Feiock v. Feiock, ___ U.S. ___, 108 S.Ct. 1423, 1429-30, 99 L.Ed.2d 721 (1988). "Once a complainant makes a showing that respondent has disobeyed a decree in complainant's favor and that damages have resulted to the complainant thereby, complainant is entitled as of right to an order in civil contempt imposing a compensatory fine." Parker v. United States, 153 F.2d 66, 70 (1st Cir.1946). See also Thompson v. Cleland, 782 F.2d 719 (7th Cir.1986); Sizzler Family Steak Houses v. Western Sizzlin Steak House, Inc., 793 F.2d 1529 (11th Cir.1986), reh. den., en banc, 797 F.2d 982; General Motors Corp. v. Gibson Chemical & Oil Corp., 627 F.Supp. 678 (E.D.N.Y.1986); New York Times Co. v. Newspaper & Mail Deliverers' Union, 517 F.Supp. 662 (S.D.N.Y.1981). Accord, Vuitton et Fils S.A. v. Carousel Handbags, 592 F.2d 126, 130 (2nd Cir.1979) (District Court required to issue order in civil contempt awarding compensatory damages where complainant has shown he suffered harm because of violation of terms of injunction).
Public interest law litigation usually presents complex legal goals. For this reason, the Court must "undertake a continuing involvement requiring flexibility both in the formulation of the decree and in the determination of the appropriate response to ensuing requests for the enforcement or modification of the original order in light of changing circumstances." Mass. Ass'n of Older Amer. v. Com'r. of Pub. Welfare, 803 F.2d 35, 38 (1st Cir.1986).
In the case at bar we are forced to act to insure that defendants, their agents, employees and servants, and in particular custody officers, conform their conduct to the strict terms of the outstanding orders issued by this Court. The orders at stake aim to protect complainant as well as any other member of the plaintiffs' class from retaliatory actions motivated by complainants' exercise of their constitutional rights. Non-compliance with these orders creates a "chilling effect" upon complainant and other members of the class. Notice is hereby given that further non-compliance with these orders could result in the initiation of criminal contempt proceedings against those acting in such fashion.
However, for the time being, and in order to compensate complainant for the physical and emotional injuries suffered as a result of defendants' contumacious conduct, it is hereby
ORDERED that a compensatory fine of $125.00 be imposed on each and everyone of the named respondents in the present action, to wit: Captain Domingo Alvarez, Sergeant Benito Torres, Officer Heriberto Martínez and Officer José Ramón García;
ORDERED that the totality of this sum ($500.00) be made payable to complainant, Domingo Grajales.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] The standard of proof in this type of proceedings is that of "clear and convincing evidence". United States v. Rizzo, 539 F.2d 458, 465 (5th Cir.1976).
[2] The pertinent section of this order reads: "...that the seven attorneys who appeared at trial shall be permitted to enter into any of the institutions operated by the Administration of Corrections and to confer with their clients and to inspect any of the conditions covered in this Order." Feliciano v. Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14, 41 (D.P.R.1980).
[3] This specialized unit of the Police is called into the institutions whenever major disturbances or riots occur in the prison population.
[4] Finding of Fact No. 5.

Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 697 F.Supp. 51 (1988)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
September 20, 1988. As Amended September 23, 1988.
52 *52 Francisco G. Bruno, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Carlos Del Valle, Hato Rey, P.R., for defendants.
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
Under our consideration are applications for interim attorney's fees submitted by five of plaintiffs' attorneys: 53 Messrs. Harvey Nachman, Rafael Pérez Bachs, Harry *53 Anduze, José Fernández Seín and Carlos Ramos.
The applications cover the hours worked until November 30, 1987. Attorneys for plaintiffs and for defendants have exchanged documents as to the hours worked in this case and rates charged in this as well as other cases. A two-day hearing was held in which all applicants testified as witnesses on their own behalf and submitted documentary and expert evidence in support of their applications.[1] Before going into the applications' merits, a brief summary of this litigation is a necessary background.
I.
Plaintiffs are all persons incarcerated under the custody of the Administration of Correction of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, and the defendants are the Governor of the Commonwealth, the Administrator of Correction, as well as the present and some former members of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth. The action was commenced by a complaint filed on February 7, 1979,[2] and certified as a class action on April 9, 1979. Plaintiffs alleged the conditions of confinement violated their rights under the United States Constitution as well as the laws and Constitution of the Commonwealth.
After more than a year of bitterly contested discovery, plaintiffs filed a motion for a preliminary injunction for emergency, provisional and extraordinary relief to halt the alleged violations. On May 7, 1980, we issued an order to show cause why the requested injunction should not be granted. A month-long hearing on the motion was held. On September 5, 1980, we granted emergency relief as to the most pressing health and custodial maladies within the prison system. Feliciano v. Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1981). Patent violations to the Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution sufficed as a basis to our order. Id. at 18. Thirty-eight days of hearing followed during the November 1980 to March 1987 period. Convinced that the chaotic conditions would take time to mend, we gave defendants some leeway to come up with a major reform plan.
During the years between 1981 and 1985 some short-lived efforts were made by defendants to comply partially with the preliminary injunction. To corroborate it, the Court visited most of the penal institutions on the Island. Evidentiary hearings were held. Finding that the constitutional violations continued and, thus, that compliance would not come about voluntarily, the Court had no choice but to appoint monitors on March 21, 1986. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 672 F.Supp. 591 (D.P. R.1986). The Court was particularly shocked at the intolerably overcrowded condition of most penal institutions.

The first formal act of the monitors, undertaken with the Court's express approval, was to convene negotiations to address the overcrowding crisis. After several months of gathering information and negotiating as to living space in the different institutions, the parties signed a stipulation on the overcrowding issue. Defendants were to provide 35 feet of living space per inmate by December 31, 1986. They had been ordered to provide that space since 1980. This Court approved the stipulation and transformed it into its order on January 26, 1987.
A month later the monitors filed a report as to defendants' compliance with the stipulation. Defendants had not complied. Plaintiffs moved for contempt and imposition of civil sanctions. Hearings were held. On July 23, 1987, 54 this Court found defendants in contempt of the January order, *54 fined them for $50,000, and imposed a prospective daily fine of $10 for each inmate above stipulated institutional capacity, 697 F.Supp. 26. Defendants moved for relief of their obligation to provide the required living space. The motion was denied. Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 672 F.Supp. 627 (D.P.R.1987).
Since then defendants have been fined every day for violating the stipulation. During February and March of the current year they were close to fully complying with it. Unfortunately, this effort was short-lived. Defendants have been paying biweekly fines of over $25,000 since May 13. By July the biweekly fines were of over $80,000. Given this pattern of non-compliance, we decided to increase the fine per inmate held in violation of the stipulation to $50 a day beginning on September 1 and an automatic increase of $10 per inmate for every upcoming month in which defendants fail to comply. Furthermore, we ordered the Ponce District Jail to commence a phase out to be completed by December 31, 1988.
II.
Eight attorneys have represented plaintiffs at some point during this litigation. Two of them have already settled their fees with defendants. Messrs. Nachman, Pérez Bachs, Anduze, Fernández Seín and Ramos await our award.[3]
Mr. Nachman was the first lawyer we tapped to represent plaintiffs. He is their lead counsel, the mastermind behind the whole case. He has been a litigator ever since he graduated from Columbia University School of Law and started practicing in 1950. Mr. Nachman is among the three better plaintiffs' lawyers of our bar. His expertise in civil rights cases is indisputable. In his fee application, Mr. Nachman claims to have worked 2,810 hours and asks us to award each hour worked at $200, his current hourly rate. His rates during the years of this litigation have increased in the following manner: $125 between 1979 and 1980; $150 between 1980 and 1986; $175 between 1986 and 1987; and since January 1, 1988, $200. Most of his work, however, is done on a contingency basis.
Mr. Pérez Bachs became involved in this litigation in 1979, when four cases in which he represented maximum security prisoners were consolidated with the one at hand. He has been litigating since his graduation from the University of Puerto Rico Law School ("U.P.R. Law School") in 1971. He is currently a partner in Puerto Rico's largest law firm, where he works as a corporate litigator. Mr. Pérez Bachs is undoubtedly one of the premiere litigators of his kind. Although he rarely worked or works on civil rights litigation other than this case, at the time of its inception he had been working on prisoners' cases for over two years. That experience made Mr. Pérez Bachs an "expert" on such cases given the only handful of attorneys then accepting prisoners' representation. In his fee application Mr. Pérez Bachs asks us to award him fees for 385.75 hours of work at a rate between $140 and $160 per hour. The bulk of his labored hours occurred during the early years of this litigation, including some worked prior to the consolidation. He has been almost completely inactive in this case since 1982. His hourly rates during the years of this litigation have increased in the following fashion: 1976 0907 $70; 1977 0907 $80; 1978 0907 $90; 1979 0907 $100; 1980 0907 $110; 1981 0907 $125; 1982 0907 $135; 1983 0907 $140; 1984 0907 $150; 1985 0907 $160; 1986 0907 $170; 1987 0907 $170; 1988 0907 $180.
Mr. Anduze was recruited by Mr. Nachman to join the case in 1979. His initial task was to teach a prisoners' rights seminar to Legal Services' ("Legal Services") attorneys along with Messrs. Nachman and Fernández Seín, in exchange for which Legal Services was to pay for the expenses incurred by plaintiffs' attorneys during the early 55 years of this litigation and to provide the help of three of Legal Services' lawyers *55 for this case. Although Mr.

Anduze does not have the years of experience Mr. Nachman does, he is also one of the shining stars of our plaintiffs' bar as well as an excellent criminal defense lawyer. He has been litigating since his graduation from the U.P.R. Law School in 1968, with a three-year interruption (1969-1972) while he served in the armed forces. From 1972 to 1979 he was associated with the law firm of Calderón, Rosa-Silva and Vargas. He has been a solo practitioner since 1979. Mr. Anduze claims 869.25 hours of work to be paid at a rate of $150 per hour. He has not had fixed billing rates since being on his own. Most of his work is done on a contingency basis. He testified that his rates during the 1979-80 period fluctuated between $100 and $150 and his current rates vary between $100 and $200. Mr. Anduze states in his application that $150 is "his current billing rate."
Mr. Fernández Seín was recruited by Mr. Nachman in 1978. They struck a deal under which Mr. Nachman provided Mr. Fernández Seín with office space in exchange for 25 hours of work a month in this case. Mr. Fernández Seín graduated from the U.P.R. Law School in 1966. Between 1966 and 1973 he litigated with private firms, mostly on behalf of insurance companies. From 1973 to 1976 he worked for the Commonwealth government, first as legal counsel to the Right to Work Administration and then as a Special Assistant to the Governor. In 1977 he joined Legal Services as a staff attorney for its litigation division. A year later he was promoted to supervisor of his division, position that he held until 1979. During his years at Legal Services, Mr. Fernández Seín became very involved in the prisoner's rights cause. He filed several class actions on behalf of prisoners. With Mr. Pérez Bachs, he was one of the Island's very few "experts" in prisoner's cases at the commencement of this case. Mr. Fernández Seín shared office space with Mr. Nachman until becoming his associate in 1983 and his full partner in 1984. He requests an award for 2,480 hours worked to be paid at $150 an hour. We do not know what were his hourly rates from 1979 to 1983. Since then his rates have been $125 per hour between 1984 and 1985, and $150 per hour since January 1986. Like Mr. Nachman, however, most of his work is done on a contingency basis.
Mr. Ramos joined the team of plaintiffs' attorneys in 1979 while working at Legal Services. He was one of the three lawyers Mr. Nachman bargained in exchange for the seminars. Mr. Ramos was employed by Legal Services in January 1979, some months after his graduation from the U.P. R. Law School. He remained there until late 1980, when he joined the faculty of the Inter American University Law School. Among other courses, he has taught a prisoner's rights seminar since joining the faculty. He has remained active in this case while teaching and has acted as court-appointed counsel in several other prisoners' and civil rights cases in this as well as the Commonwealth courts. He took a sabbatical year between 1986 and 1987 to obtain his Master in Law degree from the University of California at Berkeley. Mr. Ramos requests an award for 582.5 worked hours at $100 per hour. All hours claimed occurred after he left Legal Services. He has never had any fixed billing rates because he has not assumed any representation on such basis.
III.
A brief summary of the fees' proceeding must be told. On prior occasions we have noted the contentiousness and the excessive adversariness with which defendants have met the claims made by the plaintiff class. Feliciano, 497 F.Supp. at 17; Morales Feliciano, 672 F.Supp. at 595; and Opinion and Order of July 28, 1988, 697 F.Supp. at pp. 47-48. This incident is no exception to the stonewalling, dilatory tactics used by the defendants. They have made every attempt to make sure that "[t]his fee litigation [would result] in what the Court in Hensley warned against; `a second major litigation.'" Rogers v. Okin, 821 F.2d 22, 28 (1st Cir.1987), quoting Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1941, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). Months before the hearing on these 56 applications, *56 defendants had received from plaintiffs' attorneys statements in support of their applications. These statements itemized for each attorney the service for which payment was claimed as well as the date and the time spent on each occasion. A few days before the date in which the hearing was first scheduled, defendants moved to take depositions and for production of documents. We denied the motion for the taking of depositions, modified the request for production of documents and granted the defendants additional time to prepare for the hearing.
Not unexpectedly, the showing made by defendants at the hearing was weak. Broad-gauged attacks on duplication of work or challenges to the claims made by plaintiffs' attorneys followed the same pattern of litigation that has characterized this case. The fact that an immense amount of work had been performed for the plaintiff

by first-rate lawyers could not be contested. We had anticipated attacks on particularized claims to match the requests for information and for time to prepare for this hearing. The defendants never went beyond vagueness and protestation.
The one witness which the defendants brought before the Court only established the bad faith with which he had been treated by the defendants. Jorge Segarra Olivero, Esquire, Executive Director of Puerto Rico Legal Services, Inc., had settled the claims made by that corporation on the clear understanding that he would not be required to give evidence on this matter. Defendants nevertheless subpoenaed him, by surprise, to try and elicit from him the testimony which they had agreed not to require from him.
The applicants base their fee award petition on 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (1981). Since the claim on which we have ruled as to the unconstitutionality of the prison system is based on 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1981), we "may allow the prevailing party ... a reasonable attorney's fee as part of the costs." Plaintiffs clearly are prevailing parties under section 1988. Nadeau v. Helgemoe, 581 F.2d 275, 278-279 (1st Cir.1978). We so held on March 20, 1986. Defendants have not challenged that fact. We will thus award reasonable fees in favor of plaintiffs' attorneys.
It is settled law that to calculate attorney's fees under section 1988 a two-step process must be followed. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433-434, 103 S.Ct. 1933, 1939-1940, 76 L.Ed.2d 40 (1983). We first have to multiply hours reasonably expended by each prevailing attorney times a reasonable hourly rate, to arrive at the "lodestar" of a reasonable fee. This lodestar is "presumed to be the reasonable fee to which counsel is entitled." Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizen's Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 106 S.Ct. 3088, 3098, 92 L.Ed.2d 439 (1986) (Delaware Valley I). Then we may, in exceptional cases, make upward adjustments to the lodestar figure in light of various factors which are not accounted for in it, such as risk of nonpayment, delay in payment, and undesirability or importance of the case. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean Air, ___ U.S. ___, 107 S.Ct. 3078, 3081-3082, 97 L.Ed.2d 585 (1987) (Delaware Valley II).
A.
To determine the number of reasonable hours that each of plaintiffs' attorney should be paid for, we take the "hours actually spent and then substract from that figure hours which were duplicative, unproductive, excessive or otherwise unnecessary." Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Larkin, 749 F.2d 945, 950 (1st Cir.1984). During the attorneys' fees hearing defendants made general allegations that plaintiffs' attorneys overstaffed court appearances and negotiation meetings.[4] Defendants unfortunately did not specify which hours should have been reduced. Notwithstanding, we do not think their allegations have any merit.
As explained during the hearing, and a matter of which this Court has intimate knowledge, plaintiffs' attorneys 57 had to divide up their work by "committees". *57 During the discovery period in 1979 and 1980, they split among
themselves the nineteen penal institutions involved in this case. When the time came to argue the 1980 preliminary injunction in court or when the 1986 stipulation was negotiated, lawyers with first-hand knowledge of all institutions had to be present. Furthermore, the work was also divided by tasks. Messrs. Fernández Seín, Nachman and Ramos did most of the discovery and, thus, had a better command of the facts. They obviously had to be present in court or at the negotiating table. Mr. Anduze did not do much field work, but co-counsel needed him to be on top of all the technical aspects of courtroom appearances. His expertise in such matters made him the perfect choice for that task. In sum, the factual and procedural complexity of a class action challenging the constitutionality of the confinement conditions in nineteen penal institutions required the presence of the plaintiffs' attorneys that appeared in court or at the negotiating table.
Defendants did not make any other specific challenges to the reasonability of the claimed hours. They rightly did not do so because the claimed hours are more than reasonable. This Court knows that all applicants underrepresented the hours worked in this case. They so testified during the hearing without being challenged by defendants. A couple of examples illustrate our point. During 1983 Mr. Nachman claims compensation for 9.5 hours and calculates that at least 100 hours were not reported because of difficulty in reconstructing time records. We know that he worked more than 9.5 hours that year and that his underrepresentation estimate for that year is very modest. Mr. Pérez Bachs' claimed hours offer another fine example. He asks for compensation

for time spent on only 2 phone calls, 2 visits to institutions and 2 meeting with co-counsel. He certainly did many more than those in 12 years of litigation. We could go on and on with such examples.
Finally, we believe that the claimed hours are more than reasonable in light of defendants' contentiousness and lack of compliance with this Court's orders. It must be stressed that the prison conditions were declared unconstitutional more than eight years ago. Plaintiffs' attorneys are still litigating this case because of defendants' irresponsibility. And, as we have held before, Feliciano, 479 F.Supp. at 17; Morales Feliciano, 672 F.Supp. at 595, defendants' conduct throughout the whole litigation has been, to put it mildly, obstreperous. They have opposed, sometimes viciously, every discovery attempt or motion by plaintiffs.[5] "The government cannot litigate tenaciously [in this case, excessively] and then be heard to complain about the time necessarily spent by plaintiffs in response." Jacobs v. Mancuso, 825 F.2d 559, 562 (1st Cir.1987), quoting from, City of Riverside v. Rivera, 477 U.S. 561, n. 11, 106 S.Ct. 2686, n. 11, 91 L.Ed.2d 466 (1986).
In light of all that has transpired in this case, we will compensate plaintiffs' attorneys for all the hours claimed in their applications 0907 Mr. Nachman for 2810 hours; Mr. Pérez Bachs for 385.75 hours; Mr. Anduze for 869.25 hours; Mr. Fernández Seín for 2480 hours; and Mr. Ramos for 582.5 hours.
B.
As to the reasonable compensation for each hour worked, plaintiffs' attorneys believe to be entitled to be paid at their current hourly billing rates (except for Mr. Ramos, who does not have fixed rates). As previously indicated, their billing rates have increased periodically since the commencement of this case 0907 Mr. Nachman's from $125 to $200; Mr. Pérez Bachs' from $70 to $180; Mr. Anduze's from $100-150 to $100-$200; and Mr. Fernández Seín's from $125 (in 1984) to $150. They want to be paid current rates given the close to nine years of inflation 58 depreciating the value of the dollar and the lost interest income *58 that could have been generated if fees had been paid when their services were provided.
We sympathize with plaintiffs' argument but are constrained by our Court of Appeals decision in Rogers v. Ohio, 821 F.2d 22 (1st Cir.1987), which itself was bound to apply the principles in Library of Congress v. Shaw, 478 U.S. 310, 106 S.Ct. 2957, 92 L.Ed.2d 250 (1986). The Rogers holding is clear: unless the sovereign, in this case the Commonwealth, waives its immunity under the Eleventh Amendment, we can neither award lost interest nor take into consideration the delay-in-payment factor when assessing a reasonable fee under 42 U.S.C. § 1988. Rogers, 821 F.2d at 26-27. By ignoring this key factor we believe to be unduly penalizing plaintiffs' attorneys. Unfortunately, there is nothing we can do but echo our Court of Appeals' request:
We are not happy about this result from a policy standpoint; indeed, particularly where private and unfunded counsel are expected to be enlisted to assist the private attorney general plaintiff[s], one can hardly overestimate the chilling effect of an interminable wait for payment in sharply shrunken dollars. The situation cries out for congressional remedy.
Rogers, 821 F.2d at 28.
We have no choice but to do what the Rogers court did: use the attorney's historical rates as a point of reference in determining a reasonable fee. As to Messrs. Anduze and Fernández Seín, of whom we do not have historical rates for some years or, as to Ramos, who has no such rates, we will have to determine what would have been their reasonable historical rates for those years.
It is fair to treat Messrs. Anduze and Fernández Seín as one person for purposes of assessing rates. They have been practicing law for almost the same number of years (Mr. Anduze, 20 years; Mr. Fernández Seín, 22 years). Both have been actively litigating civil rights cases since the late 1970's. Mr. Fernández Seín has been involved in this case maybe a few months longer than Mr. Anduze. They are equally well-respected within the Puerto Rican legal community.
As noted before, supra, pp. 54-55, both of them offered some testimony as to historical rates. Mr. Anduze said his 1979-80 hourly rates ranged from between $100 and $150 and currently go from between $100 and $200. He

indicated in his application that $150 is his current rate. Mr. Fernández Seín's historical rates were $125 during the 1984-85 period and since January 1986 they have been fixed at $150. We also have rates that they have been assigned in previous civil rights cases. Mr. Anduze's hours were valued at $150 for in-court and $100 for out-of-court in a recent civil rights case. Mr. Fernández Seín has been awarded fees by this Court in the following civil rights cases: Morales v. Romero Barceló, Civil No. 80-1783 0907 $100 per hour awarded in 1983; Wildman v. Lerner Stores, 771 F.2d 605 (1st Cir.1985) 0907 $100 per hour awarded in 1984; Vázquez v. Racing Sport Adm., Civil No. 82-27960907 $100 per hour awarded in 1984; Cristóbal v. Romero Barceló, Civil No. 81-0006 0907 $125 per hour in 1986; Valdivieso v. Burgos, Civil No. 82-1430 0907 $125 per hour in 1986; Baldomero Arbona v. Awilda Aponte Roque, Civil No. 85-1367 0907 $150 per hour awarded in August 11, 1988.
With all this professional background and fee data in mind, we fix Messrs. Anduze's and Fernández Seín's historical hourly rates in the following fashion: $110 for the 1979 and 1980 years; $120 for the 1981 and 1982 years; $130 for the 1983 and 1984 years; $140 for the 1985 and 1986 years; and $150 for 1987. The $10 increase every two years is to reflect what is obvious to all of us in the legal profession: an attorney's rate goes up as he or she accumulates years of experience. We believe these rates are reasonable approximations of what would have been the prevailing market rates for civil rights lawyers with the skill, experience and reputation of Messrs. Anduze and Fernández Seín.
Mr. Ramos stands on a different footing. He has been practicing law for nine years. Although we have only but 59 praise for his abilities as a litigator, his experience in *59 court is far less than those of his fellow attorneys.
Knowing the legal fees' market, these factors would have certainly been reflected in the rates Mr. Ramos could have commanded if he had worked on a fixed rate basis. With that in mind, we believe the market would have valued Mr. Ramos' hourly rate in the following fashion: $60 an hour during 1980 and 1981; $80 an hour during 1982 and 1983; $100 an hour during 1984 and 1985; and $120 an hour in 1986 and 1987. The $20 increase every two years is to account for the fact that, as we said before, lawyer's rates go up with years of experience. The bianual increases are higher than those we assigned to Messrs. Anduze and Fernández Seín because the experience a young lawyer acquires during the early years of his or her career is usually more valuable than what he can learn after fifteen or twenty years in the profession.
The rate-fixing task does not end with the determination of historical rates. We also must assign different rates to different tasks following the practice approved by our Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court of the United States. See United States of America v. Metropolitan District Commission, 847 F.2d 12, 19 (1st Cir.1988); Jacobs, 825 F.2d at 561, n. 3; Miles v. Sampson, 675 F.2d 5, 9 (1st Cir. 1982); Furtado v. Bishop, 635 F.2d 915, 920 (1st Cir.1979), cert. denied, 444 U.S. 1035, 100 S.Ct. 710, 62 L.Ed.2d 672 (1980); Delaware Valley I, 106 S.Ct. at 3099.
Two factors come to mind in trying to differentiate the tasks performed by plaintiffs' attorneys in this case: (a) how much legal skill and ability is required by the task; and (b) how emotionally and mentally demanding is the task. For example, an hour in court or brief-drafting will be more valuable than fact-finding tasks, which in this case would be, among others, visits to the prison or interviews with prisoners. By the same token, since an hour of deposition-taking is usually not as legally and mentally exacting as an hour of writing letters or reviewing documents, the former will be priced higher than the latter.
In light of those principles, we have divided up the tasks performed by plaintiffs' attorneys in three categories. They will be awarded a fraction of or full historical hourly rate depending on which category the task falls. The categories are:
1) Low: includes notifications and visits to the penal institutions; prisoners' interviews; conferences with co-counsel or adversaries (unless otherwise categorized); drafting of letters; drafting and reading of intra-counsel memoranda; proofreading and copyreading; notification of and preparation for depositions; review of documents; telephone conversations; and travel time.
Hours falling under the low category will be compensated at 60 percent of the applicable historical rate.
2) Medium: includes general research; taking of and attendance to depositions; preparations for court hearings or conferences (if so specified on the time records); preparation of subpoenas,

class notices, interrogatories and answers to them, prisoners' questionnaires, and affidavits; unspecified meetings with monitors; preparation for prisoner rights' seminar; and preparation of fee applications.
Hours falling under the medium category will be compensated at 80 percent of the applicable historical rate.
3) High: includes court appearances and in-chambers conferences; legislature and administrative agencies' appearances; jail visits with the judge; preparation and drafting/dictation of motions and briefs; negotiations toward stipulation with court monitors and defendants.
Hours falling under the high category will be compensated at the full applicable historical rate.
The composition of the team of plaintiffs' counsel compels us to implement the categories. Four out of the five applicants command very high hourly rates, and rightfully so, given their skill and reputation. This case had to be managed by lawyers of their caliber. By the same token, not all tasks to be performed had to be done by lawyers 60 of their extraordinary capacity. *60 An analogy with a large law firm illustrates our point. If plaintiffs would have been represented by such a firm, tasks in the low and medium categories could have been delegated, partly or totally, to associates or junior partners charging a lower fee. By valuing the applicants' claimed hours at 60 or 80 percent of their historical value, we superimpose such hierarchy in an attempt to arrive at a reasonable fee award.[6] The use of the historical rates as a reference point reflects the fact that, although task differentiation is appropriate, we must not forget their skill and reputation. An "associate hour" of work by any of the applicants will obviously be more efficient and, therefore, more valuable, than a "real associate" hour.
IV.
The implementation of the guidelines in Part III of this opinion result in the following "lodestars":[7]

Mr. Nachman: Mr. Pérez Bachs: Mr. Anduze: Mr. Fernández Seín: Mr. Ramos:

$337,422.50 $35,235.00 $84,197.50
$228,151.50 $41,075.00

These "lodestars" are "presumed to be the reasonable fee to which counsel are entitled." Delaware Valley II, 106 S.Ct. at 3098, quoting from Blum v. Stenson, 465 U.S. 886, 104 S.Ct. 1541, 79 L.Ed.2d 891 (1984). We believe, however, that this is one of the exceptional cases where an upward adjustment is appropriate based on three factors:[8] (a) The undesirability of this case, (b) the public importance of this case, and (c) counsel for plaintiffs' preclusion of more remunerative employment due to the acceptance of this case. An explanation ensues.

Plaintiffs' representation is undesirable because their cause is unpopular. The prisoners' cause is repudiated in a community, like Puerto Rico, infested with crime. The Island's largest cities, San Juan and Ponce, have among the worst murder-per-capita rates in the United States. Robberies, rapes, drug deals, and other felonies are so common Puerto Ricans see them as part of every day life. The general population's attitude toward those who commit or are accused of committing crimes is understandably one bordering in despise. Many Puerto Ricans believe that since plaintiffs are criminals, they deserve the conditions under which they live in the prisons. We must also note that Puerto Rico is decades behind the United States in the prisoners' rights movement. While prisoners in the States fought over their rights to law books in the 1970's, Puerto Rican prisoners fought, and are still fighting, over a humane amount of living space. Prisoners' rights had been completely ignored by our government and, sadly, by our legal community until the commencement of this litigation.

The case is also undesirable because it involves grueling work. In January 1989, this litigation will be ten years old. More than a thousand motions have been filed. Transcripts of in-court proceedings cover hundreds of pages. 61 Expert witnesses had *61 to be procured in the United States. Videos and hundreds of photos were taken and introduced into evidence.

This is not the typical plaintiff in a civil rights' case who knocks on the lawyer's door. Access to plaintiffs was a severe problem. Plaintiffs' counsel had to travel throughout the Island's twenty-four institutions to visit their clients, a task made more difficult when prisoners are being constantly moved from institution to institution to prevent them from consulting with their lawyers. Hundreds of inmates were interviewed. A further complication was that plaintiffs' attorneys had to rely on their clients' word as to prison conditions. Before we ordered defendants to open up the institutions, plaintiffs' attorneys were not allowed to visit them. It is a very difficult task to build up a case when a lawyer is unable to investigate the facts for himself. Finally, and more importantly, having to go in and out of prisons for nine years is undesirable in itself, and that normal discomfort reaches depressive levels when the institutions are as ill-kept as those under defendants' control. We have commented extensively on the institutions' grim conditions elsewhere. See Feliciano, 479 F.Supp. 14; Morales Feliciano, 672 F.Supp. 591. Plaintiffs' lawyers have had to deal with the Island's prison bureaucracy, which has demonstrated to be totally inefficient and uncooperative.
The case's undesirability is further compounded by its economic effects on the practice of plaintiffs' counsel. Applicants in private practice have spent many hours of billable time in this case when they could have been billing rates higher than those we have allowed them or taking cases on contingency basis that would have resulted in higher paychecks.[9] To illustrate our point, we have allowed them to charge 60 or 80 percent of what were or would have been their historical rates for 59 percent of the hours claimed by Mr. Nachman; 56 percent of the hours claimed by Mr. Pérez Bachs; 49 percent of the hours claimed by Mr. Anduze; and 68 percent of the hours claimed by Mr. Fernández Seín. Of course, we recognize that their billing rates "at best afford relevant comparisons," U.S. v. Metropolitan District Commission, 847 F.2d 12, 17 (1st Cir.1988), quoting from Blum, 465 U.S. at 895-896 n. 11, 104 S.Ct. at 1547-1548 n. 11 and, that we are therefore not compelled to base our award on those rates. "It is precisely because there is no external market-based check upon the scope of counsel's efforts in such a case that it falls to the court to act as the guarantor of fairness." Metropolitan, 847 F.2d at 17. On the other hand, we may not completely ignore the aforementioned percentages, especially knowing that these lawyers did not take this case voluntarily.
The public importance of this case is enormous. Plaintiffs' attorneys are the pioneers of the prisoners' rights movement in Puerto Rico. Without their initiative, more than 8,000 citizens would probably still be held under custody in violation of their basic constitutional rights. Plaintiffs' attorneys took it upon themselves to achieve an imperative prison reform and at least have laid out a solid ground on which to build it. They have not done more because of defendants' protraction. It is up to defendants to comply with the minimal requirements this Court has imposed.
Quantifying these three award enhancement factors is far from an exact science. But mindful of the frowning at multipliers in recent case law of our Court of Appeals and the Supreme Court, Delaware Valley I, 106 S.Ct. at 3098; Cortés Quiñones v. Jiménez Nettleship, 842 F.2d 556, 564 (1st Cir.1988), we will increase each applicant's lodestar a minimal 10 percent for each factor applicable to him. In other words, the lodestars of Messrs. Nachman, Pérez Bachs, Anduze and Fernández Seín will be increased by 30 percent and Mr. Ramos' lodestar will be increased by 20 percent. The awards will therefore be:

Mr. Nachman: Mr. Pérez Bachs: Mr. Anduze:

$438,649.25 $45,805.50
$109,456.75

62 *62 Mr. Fernández Seín: Mr. Ramos:
IT IS SO ORDERED.

$296,596.95 $49,290.00

APPENDIX A
This is a breakdown, by the categories defined in Part B III of the opinion, of the annual fees (without multipliers) we are awarding in favor of Messrs. Nachman, Pérez Bachs, Anduze and Fernández Seín. The following is the model/description of how the calculations were made: YEAR X (year X's historical rate) Low category hours claimed × 60% of year X's historical rate = fees awarded for low category hours in year X. Medium category hours claimed × 80% of year X's historical rate = fees awarded for medium category hours in year X. High category hours claimed × 100% of year X's historical rate = fees awarded for high category hours in year X. Total hours claimed for year X/Lodestar (total fees awarded (without multiplier) for year X).

MR. NACHMAN

1979 ($125) 192.5 63 36.5 _____ 292

× $ 75 = × $100 = × $125 =

$14,437.50 6,300.00 4,562.50
__________ $25,300.00

1980 ($150)

596.75 × $ 90 = $ 53,707.50

169.25 × $120 = 20,310.00

608.25 × $150 = 91,237.50

_______

___________

1374.25

$165,255.00

1981 ($150) 160.5 × $ 90 = 16.75 × $120 = 234.75 × $150 = ______ 412

$14,445.00 2,010.00
35,212.50 __________ $51,667.50

1982 ($150)

19

× $ 90 =

0

× $120 =

62.25 × $150 =

_____

81.25

$ 1,710.00 00.00
9,337.50 __________ $11,047.50

1983 ($150) 3.5 0 6 ___ 9.5

× $ 90 = × $120 = × $150 =

$ 315.00 00.00
900.00 _________ $1,215.00

1984 ($150)

56.75 × $ 90 =

7

× $120 =

38.5 × $150 =

______

102.25

$ 5,107.50 840.00
5,775.00 __________ $11,722.50

1985 ($150)

66

× $ 90 =

7.75 × $120 =

6

× $150 =

_____

79.75

$5,940.00 930.00 900.00
_________ $7,770.00

1986 ($175) 171.25 × $105 = 16.50 × $140 = 74.25 × $175 = ______ 262

$17,981.25 2,310.00
12,993.75 __________ $33,285.00

1987 ($200) 111.75 × $120 = 7.50 × $160 = 77.75 × $200 = ______ 197

$13,410.00 1,200.00
15,550.00 __________ $30,160.00

Total hours 2810/Lodestar $337,422.50

MR. PÉREZ BACHS

1976 ($70)

1.25 × $ 42 =

0

× $ 56 =

11.75 × $ 70 =

______

13

1977 ($80)

6.75 × $ 48 =

2

× $ 64 =

11.25 × $ 80 =

______

20

1978 ($90)

8.75 × $ 54 =

32

× $ 72 =

9.25 × $ 90 =

______

50

$52.50 00.00
822.50 _______ $875.00
$ 324.00 128.00 900.00
_________ $1,352.00
$ 472.50 2,304.00 832.50
_________ $3,609.00

1979 ($100) 25.5 8.5 24.5 ____ 58.5

× $ 60 = × $ 80 = × $100 =

$1,530.00 680.00
2,450.00 _________ $4,660.00

1980 ($110)

20.5 × $ 66 = $ 1,353.00

9.5 × $ 88 =

836.00

71.25 × $110 =

7,837.50

______

__________

101.25

$10,026.50

63 *63

1981 ($125)

40.75 × $ 75 = $3.056.25

7.50 × $100 =

750.00

42.75 × $125 = 5,343.75

_____

_________

91

$9,150.00

1982 ($135)

14.5 × $ 81 =

0

× $108 =

0

× $135 =

____

14.5

$1,174.50 00.00 00.00
_________ $1,174.50

1983 ($140) 5 0 0
__ 5

× $ 84 = × $112 = × $140 =

$420.00 00.00 00.00
_______ $420.00

1984 ($150) 4 0 0
__ 4

× $ 90 = × $120 = × $150 =

$360.00 00.00 00.00
_______ $360.00

1985

0

0

1986 ($160)

1.25 × $ 96 =

27.25 × $128 =

0

× $160 =

_____

28.50

120.00 3,488.00
00.00 _________ $3,608.00

Total hours 385.75/Lodestar $35,235.00

MR. ANDUZE

1979 ($110) 26 15 0 __ 41

× $ 66 = × $ 88 = × $110 =

$1,716.00 1,320.00 110.00
_________ 3,036.00

1980 ($110)

141 × $ 66 = $ 9,306.00

59 × $ 88 =

5,192.00

272.75 × $110 = 30,002.50

______

__________

472.75

$44,500.50

1981 ($120)

38 × $ 72 = $ 2,736.00

0 × $ 96 =

00.00

137.5 × $120 = 16,500.00

_____

__________

175.5

$19,236.00

1982 ($120) 9.5 0 0 ___ 9.5

× $ 72 = × $ 96 = × $120 =

$684.00 00.00 00.00
_______ $684.00

1983 ($130) 2 0 0 _ 2

× $ 78 = × $104 = × $130 =

$156.00 00.00 00.00
_______ $156.00

1984 ($130)

7.75 × $ 78 =

0

× $104 =

7.5 × $130 =

_____

15.25

$ 604.50 00.00
975.00 _________ $1,579.50

1985 ($140)

39.25 × $ 84 =

0

× $112 =

8.5 × $140 =

____

47.75

$3,297.00 00.00
1,190.00 _________ $4,487.00

1986 ($140)

35.5 × $ 84 =

4.75 × $112 =

0

× $140 =

_____

40.25

$2,982.00 532.00 00.00
_________ $3,514.00

1987 ($150)

43.5 × $ 90 =

5.75 × $120 =

16

× $150 =

_____

65.25

$3,915.00 690.00
2,400.00 _________ $7,005.00

Total hours 869.25/Lodestar $84,197.50

MR. FERNÁNDEZ SEÍN

1979 ($110)

157.75 × $ 66 = $10,411.50

129.25 × $ 88 = 11,374.00

6.5 × $110 =

715.00

______

__________

293.5

$22,500.50

1980 ($110)

435.75 × $ 66 = $28,759.50

145.25 × $ 88 = 12,782.00

414 × $110 = 45,540.00

_____

__________

995

$87,081.50

1981 ($120)

136.5 × $ 72 = $ 9,828.00

14.5 × $ 96 =

1,392.00

168 × $120 = 20,160.00

____

__________

319

$31,380.00

1982 ($120)

67.25 × $ 72 =

29

× $ 96 =

8

× $120 =

______

104.25

$4,842.00 2,784.00 960.00
_________ $8,586.00

1983 ($130)

39.75 × $ 78 = $ 3,100.50

59.5 × $104 =

6,188.00

90.75 × $130 = 11,797.50

_____

__________

190

$21,086.00

64 *64

1984 ($130)

107.5 × $ 78 = $ 8,385.00

4 × $104 =

416.00

12 × $130 = 1,560.00

_____

__________

123.5

$10,361.00

1985 ($140)

90.75 × $ 84 = $ 7,623.00

14.75 × $112 = 1,652.00

26.25 × $140 = 3,675.00

______

__________

131.75

$12,950.00

1986 ($140)

107.25 × $ 84 = $ 9,009.00

52.50 × $112 = 5,880.00

17.5 × $140 = 2,450.00

______

__________

177.25

$17,339.00

1987 ($150)

76.25 × $ 90 = $ 6,862.50

14 × $120 = 1,680.00

55.5 × $150 = 8,325.00

______

__________

145.75

$16,867.50

Total hours 2480/Lodestar $228,151.50

APPENDIX B

This is a breakdown, by categories during 1986 and 1987, see n. 4, of the annual fees (without multipliers) we are awarding in Mr. Ramos' favor:

1980-81 404.5 hours × $60 hourly rate = $24,270.
1982-83 15 hours × $80 hourly rate = $1,200.
1984-85 84.5 hours × $100 hourly rate = $8,450.
1986-87 ($120 hourly rate) 75.5 hours in low and medium categories

× $90 (75% hourly rate) = $6,795.
3 hours in high category × $120 (full hourly rate) = $360.
Total hours 582.5/Lodestar $41,075.00
[1] At the beginning of the hearing defendants attempted to submit a so-called "hearing aid brief" that we disallowed. At the end of the hearing, they again tried to submit it as a post-hearing brief. We reiterated our rejection convinced that our acceptance would be unfair to plaintiffs' attorneys, who would not have had an opportunity to oppose the brief. Defendants had a chance to present their challenges to the claimed hours and fees during the hearing, where we would have had the benefit of face-to-face confrontation.
[2] This action originated as a letter complaint filed on January 2, 1979. After petitioner was allowed to proceed in forma pauperis and an attorney was named to represent him, the formal complaint was filed on this date.
[3] Mrs. Ivonne Santiago submitted her application, belatedly, on September 9, 1988. We will be ruling on it very soon.
[4] See August 15, 1988, Transcript ("Tr. 8/15/88"), pp. 107-110.
[5] The latest example was the Secretary of Justice's complete disobeyance of this Court's July 13, 1986, order to produce documents in relation to the attorneys' fees issue. We could have held him in contempt but reluctantly refrained from doing so because that would have further delayed the attorney's fees award.
[6] We start categorizing Mr. Ramos' hours after 1985, when he becomes a "partner" in this imaginary law firm. Pre-1985 hours are valued at "associate" rates and, thus, need not be further reduced through categorization. After 1985, his hours in the low and medium categories are priced at 75 percent of his historical rate.
[7] See Appendixes A and B for an annual breakdown per category for each applicant.
[8] We would have considered another enhancement factor, risk of loss, but unfortunately plaintiffs' attorneys did not present the quite specific evidence required in Delaware Valley II. That case sets forth two criteria for awarding such enhancement. Justice O'Connor together with four dissenting justices (Blackman, Brennan, Marshall and Stevens) held that "compensation for contingency must be based on the difference in market treatment of contingent fee cases as a class, rather than on an assessment of the riskiness of any particular case." Delaware Valley II, 107 S.Ct. at 3089. (O'Connors, J. concurring) A different majority (Chief Justice Rehnquist and Justices White, Powell, Scalia and O'Connor) held that "no enhancement for risk is appropriate unless the applicant can establish that without an adjustment for risk the prevailing party `would have faced substantial difficulties in finding counsel in the local or other relevant market'." Id. at 3091 (O'Connor, J. concurring, quoting White, J. plurality) Plaintiffs' attorneys made neither showing. See McKenzie v. Kennickell, 684 F.Supp. 1097 (D.D. C.1988).
[9] Mr. Ramos is not affected by this economic factor because he is not in the private practice. Working on this case certainly has precluded him from doing more enjoyable things but not from assuming more remunerative representations.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 771 F.Supp. 11 (1991)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4(PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
June 12, 1991. Order Appointing Special Master July 18, 1991.
12 *12 Nachman & Fernandez Sein, Santurce, P.R., Mcconnell, Valdes, San Juan, P.R., Carlos Ramos Gonzales, Jose A. Fernandez Paoli, Santurce, P.R., Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Gonzalez Badillo & Davila, Harry Anduze, Pia Gallegos, Hato Rey, P.R., Jeffrey Williams, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Ramirez & Ramirez, Hato Rey, P.R., Pedro Del Valle, Federal Lit. Div., Dept. of Justice, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
On May 30, 1991, the court entered an order finding defendants in contempt of its order of March 30, 1990 and directing defendants to enter into a contract with BRCA for conducting certain evaluations and preparing plans of corrective action required by §§ 17, 18, and 19 of the environmental plan approved by the March 1990 order. Defendants were required to file an executed contract by June 10, 1991, but they have failed to do so.
In its earlier order, the court stated that it would not adopt the remedy sought by plaintiffs, the imposition of a coercive fine in the amount of $10,000 per day until defendants file the evaluations and plans required by §§ 17, 18, and 19 of the environmental plan. Rather, it directed defendants to enter into an appropriate contract with BRCA within ten days and announced that it would enter an additional order to ensure compliance with those critically important provisions of the environmental plan if that became necessary.
Accordingly, for the reasons set forth below, the court will exercise its discretion to appoint a special master, pursuant to Rule 70 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to enter into and oversee performance of a contract with BRCA for the purposes set forth above. As quickly as the court identifies a person to serve as master, it will enter an order appointing the special master and setting forth the specific powers and duties of that individual.[1]
Rule 70 reads, in relevant part,
If a judgment directs a party to execute a conveyance of land or to deliver deeds or other documents or to perform any other specific act and the party fails to comply within the time specified, the court may direct the act to be done at the cost of the disobedient party by some other person appointed by the court and the act when so done has like effect as if done by the party.
Rule 70 "gives the courts ample power to deal with parties who seek to thwart judgments by refusals to comply 13 with orders to perform specific acts." Wright & Miller, 12 Federal Practice and Procedure *13 § 3021. See also
T.J. Moore, Moore's Federal Practice § 70.02.
The use of Rule 70 is not limited to conveyances of land, but may be employed whenever a party fails to perform any specific act ordered by a court. Gilbert v. Johnson, 490 F.2d 827 (5th Cir.1974). The rule has been relied upon, for example, to employ an accountant to render an accounting that a party refused to make, Standard

Scale & Supply Co. v. Cropp Concrete Mach. Co., 6 F.2d 447 (7th Cir.1925), to abate a nuisance, Clarke v. Chicago, B. & Q.R. Co., 62 F.2d 440 (10th Cir.1932), cert. denied, 290 U.S. 629, 54 S.Ct. 49, 78 L.Ed.2d 548 (1933), and to reinstate a contract of insurance. Lufkin v. United States, 168 F.Supp. 451 (D.N.H.1958).
The rule also has been relied upon by courts to effectuate judgments in public reform litigation. In United States v. City of Detroit, 476 F.Supp. 512 (E.D.Mich. 1979), the district court appointed the Mayor of Detroit (who had acknowledged that "the buck stops here and with me") to administer the water treatment plant of the City of Detroit after the defendants, the City and its Sewer Department, had failed to achieve compliance with a consent decree. In Gates v. Collier, 616 F.2d 1268 (5th Cir.1980), a case involving conditions at Mississippi's Parchman Penitentiary, the court of appeals relied upon Rule 70 to affirm a directive to the State Auditor and the State Treasurer to take steps that would result in satisfaction of an award of attorneys' fees.
In conclusion, the court cannot in good conscience brook further delay with respect to compliance with §§ 17, 18, and 19 of the environmental plan; nor can it tolerate continued defiance of its lawful orders. It has concluded that imposition of coercive fines will lead to additional delay in the vindication of plaintiffs' constitutional rights, but it eschews the harsh remedy of conditional imprisonment of any of the defendants in this action. Thus, the court will rely upon its traditional equitable power to impose a remedy that is precisely tailored to the immediate need for prompt and effective compliance with these critically important provisions of the environmental plan.
Wherefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that a special master will be appointed to enter into and oversee performance of a contract with BRCA for the performance of evaluations of electrical, plumbing, and major structural deficiencies throughout all AOC facilities, as well as for the preparation of plans for corrective action, as required by §§ 17, 18, and 19 of the environmental plan approved by the court on March 30, 1990. It is further
ORDERED that all actions of the special master shall be subject to the review and approval of the court in accordance with the terms of an order of reference to be entered appointing the master and setting forth the specific duties and powers of that individual.
SO ORDERED.
ORDER APPOINTING SPECIAL MASTER
By order of June 12, 1991, the court announced its intention to appoint a special master, pursuant to Rule 70 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to enter into and oversee a contract with BRCA to perform certain evaluations and to prepare certain plans required by sections 17, 18, and 19 of the Environmental Plan approved by the court on March 30, 1990. In that order, the court indicated as well that it would rely on the more detailed provisions of Rule 53(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in issuing its order of reference appointing the master. For the reasons set forth in the court's June 12 order and its order of May 30, 1991, finding defendants in contempt of the March 30, 1990 order, the court will appoint Jorge A. Pierluisi-Diaz to serve as special master, but will limit his duties at this time to the negotiation and execution of an appropriate contract. Upon approval of a contract, pursuant to the terms of this order, the defendants in this action will be given an opportunity to oversee performance of that contract if they wish to do so; only if they decline to provide the necessary supervision will it 14 be *14 necessary for the court to assign this responsibility to the special master.
Mr. Pierluisi-Díaz is a civil engineer with exceptionally broad experience. He has served as Construction Inspector, Chief Inspector, and finally as Civil Engineer in the Design Department of the Army Antilles Engineers. He has worked as a general contractor and developer in the construction of public and private housing projects, hotels, hospital buildings, office buildings, industrial buildings, and shopping centers. For eight years, he served as Secretary of the Housing for the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. He is a Member of the Puerto Rican College of Engineers and Surveyors, a Member of the Panel of Arbitrators of the American Arbitration Association, and the former President of the Puerto Rican chapter of the Associated General Contractors of America. At the present time, Mr. Pierluisi-Díaz is engaged in engineering consulting, arbitration, and the development of feasibility studies and inspections for construction projects in Puerto Rico.

In summary, Mr. Pierluisi-Díaz is exceptionally well qualified to perform the services required of the special master in connection with negotiation and execution of a contract for the evaluations of plumbing, electrical, and major structural deficiencies and for the development of plans of corrective action required by the Environmental Plan. Wherefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that, pursuant to Rule 70 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Jorge A. Pierluisi-Díaz is appointed to serve as special master. The duties and powers of the special master are designated in this order pursuant to that rule and Rule 53(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. It is further
ORDERED that, as promptly as possible, the special master shall enter into and conclude negotiations with BRCA regarding a contract for professional services for the performance of evaluations of electrical, plumbing, and major structural deficiencies throughout all facilities of the Administration of Corrections and for the preparation of plans of corrective action regarding any deficiencies that are discovered, as required by sections 17, 18, and 19 of the Environmental Plan approved by the court on March 30, 1990. It is further
ORDERED that, at the conclusion of these negotiations, the special master shall provide the court with his recommendations regarding the sufficiency of the proposed contract to accomplish the objectives of sections 17, 18, and 19 of the Environmental Plan approved by the court on March 30, 1990, the reasonableness of the cost of the proposed contract, and the reasonableness of the length of time projected for the completion of the required evaluations and of the required plans for corrective action. It is further
ORDERED that, following the court's review and approval of the proposed contract, the special master will be directed to execute the contract on behalf of the defendants in this action. It is further
ORDERED that the special master shall be provided access to all facilities, records, and personnel of the Administration of Corrections to the extent such access is necessary to accomplish the objectives of this order. The defendants in this action, shall cooperate with the special master and shall respond to all requests for assistance made by the special master in connection with the performance of his duties pursuant to this order. It is further
ORDERED that the special master shall be compensated at the rate of One Hundred Thirty-Five Dollars ($135.00) per hour and shall be reimbursed for all necessary and reasonable expenses in connection with the fulfillment of his duties pursuant to this order. The special master shall file an itemized statement of his fees and expenses, which, when approved by the court, shall be paid by defendants as costs in this action.
SO ORDERED.
[1] The instant order will discuss in some detail the authority provided by Rule 70 for the master's appointment. The court also will rely upon the more detailed provisions of Rule 53(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in issuing its subsequent order of reference setting forth the duties and powers of the master.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 775 F.Supp. 477 (1991)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79-4 (PG).
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
June 25, 1991.
478 *478 Nachman & Fernandez Sein, Santurce, P.R., McConnell Valdes Kelley Sifre Griggs & Ruiz-Suria, San Juan, P.R., Carlos Ramos Gonzalez, Santurce, P.R., Jose A. Fernandez Paoli, Miramar, Santurce, P.R., Carlos Garcia Gutierrez, Gonzalez Badillo & Davila, Harry Anduze, Pia Gallegos, Hato Rey, P.R., Jeffrey Williams, San Juan, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Ramirez & Ramirez, Hato Rey, P.R., Pedro Del Valle, Federal Lit. Div., Dept. of Justice, San Juan P.R., for defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR PARTIAL AND TEMPORARY RELIEF FROM FINES
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This court yet again is confronted with an effort by the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to evade the coercive force of contempt sanctions and, in so doing, to continue its long resistance to rectifying pervasive unconstitutional conditions of confinement in Puerto Rican prisons. In their May 6, 1991 Motion Seeking Partial and Temporary Relief from Fines, defendants sought a reduction of fines imposed as a result of their decade-long failure to comport with this court's orders requiring the Administration of Corrections (AOC) to provide at least 35 square feet of living and sleeping space to each person incarcerated in its penal institutions. This most recent attempt to control the cost of noncompliance founds itself on an altogether specious argument. Because the court had been forced to close admissions to an institution overcome by life-threatening environmental and health conditions, defendants contend they are entitled to relief from the fines generated by the attendant rise in population at other institutions.[1]
Plaintiffs, quite naturally, opposed defendants' motion. On May 30, 1991, the court conducted a hearing on the matter. For the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, defendants' motion is denied.
II. HISTORY OF 35 SQUARE FEET STANDARD AND DEFENDANTS' CONTEMPT
The sheer audacity of defendants' motion can only be understood fully in the context of prior proceedings relating to the 35 square feet standard. In its March 21, 1986 memorandum opinion, the court attempted to describe the effects of overcrowding on the quality life in prison:
Overcrowding is at the center of the many ills which make the conditions of imprisonment in the Commonwealth's penal institutions constitutionally unacceptable. Neither statistics nor anecdote will suffice to express the intensity of confinement, physical and psychological, to which the plaintiff class is condemned.... As the court visited each institution, the sense of physical

closeness and the revulsion at so much compressed humanity grew to an awareness of the psychological stress which must affect any human being almost totally deprived of privacy or intimacy.
Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 672 F.Supp. 591, 597 (D.P.R.1986).
From this matter's inception twelve years ago, this court has made clear time and again its conviction that crowding creates, contributes to, or exacerbates virtually every adverse and dangerous condition of confinement. See Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1980) (issuing preliminary injunction). Thus, as early as 1980, defendants were ordered to provide each member of the plaintiff class temporarily with at least 35 square feet of living and sleeping space; ultimately, the court envisioned that each inmate confined to a closed cell would be provided with at least 70 square feet of space while inmates assigned to dormitories would receive at least 55 square feet. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barceló, supra, 497 F.Supp. at 41.
479 *479 Between issuance of the preliminary injunction and September 1986, defendants at no time complied with the 35 square feet standard. On September 10, 1986, the parties entered into a stipulation, the terms of which were provisionally approved by the court on September 26, 1986 and finally approved on January 26, 1987. In general, the stipulation set institutional and housing unit capacities for dormitories first at 35 square feet per inmate and ultimately at 55 square feet, and required that cells containing less than 70 quare feet be used to house only one inmate. The stipulation also provided, however, that in specific cell blocks in which "open celling" was permitted, cells containing less than 70 square feet could be used to house two prisoners.[2] Finally, the stipulation and order required compliance with the 35 square feet standard at every institution by January 1, 1987.[3]
Inmates still were being provided with less than 35 square feet of living space in July 1987. On July 23, upon motion by plaintiffs and after a hearing, the court found defendants in contempt of its January 26, 1987 order and ordered them to pay sanctions in the amount of $50,000 as well as a prospective fine of $10 per day for each inmate housed either in an institution in which the total population exceeded the total capacity at 35 square feet or in a housing unit in which the population exceeded the capacity at 35 square feet.[4] At the time this order was issued, nearly seven years had passed since defendants first were ordered to comport with the 35 square feet standard and seven months had passed since the January 1, 1987 deadline. Based on the testimony offered by defendants at the contempt hearing, the court found that "by and large, the only efforts that have been made to achieve compliance with the court's order on crowding have involved the construction of new housing units for prisoners. No coordinated efforts have been made by the Commonwealth to control the flow of prisoners into or out of existing facilities." July 23, 1987 order, 697 F.Supp. 26 at 34.
Rather than appealing the July 23, 1987 order, defendants moved for modification of the underlying consent decree pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. They based their motion on a number of grounds, including 0907 ironically enough 0907 the planned construction of Bayamón 1072. See section III, infra. In its September 14, 1987 opinion and order, the court denied modification, noting that
defendants have provided no support for the proposition that, by virtue of ... changed circumstances, they should be relieved from the requirement of providing inmates with 35 square feet of living space. The underlying rights of inmates remain fully accrued, yet denied, and will until defendants take their obligations under the order seriously, and fulfill them.
Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 672 F.Supp. 627, 634 (D.P.R.1987).
By August 1988, defendants still had not achieved compliance with the 35 square feet standard. Plaintiffs moved 480 for an increase in the amount of the fines, which *480 was granted in an August 15, 1988 order. "In view of
defendants' failure to abide by the maximum capacities ... and the absence of legal excuse for such noncompliance, any failure by the court to increase the sanction in an effort to achieve the objective of the original order would be tantamount to abdication of the judicial function." August 15, 1988 order at 6. Thus, the daily fine per inmate was raised initially to $50, to increase by $10 monthly until compliance was achieved. This

increase was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. See Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 887 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1989).[5]
The impact of these fines at last was felt, and the combination of new facilities, the passage of legislation increasing "good time" awards for inmates,[6] and the commencement of the Expedited Bail Project (E.B.P.) contributed to a reduction in crowding.[7] Between January and August 1990, the Commonwealth owed virtually no fines for violations of the 35 square feet standard. See 106th, 109th-112th, 116th, 117th, 120th, 122nd-124th, 126th, 128th, and 130th Reports of the Court Monitor pursuant to the court's July 23, 1987 order.
In August 1990, however, the population at certain institutions began to creep upward once again. See 131st Report of the Court Monitor 0907 99th Report Pursuant to the Court's Order of July 23, 1987, confirmed October 26, 1990. As the 132nd Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Reintegration, confirmed April 23, 1991, later revealed, this increase derived from the levelling-off of "good time" releases and the failure of defendants to implement functional early release programs and pre-release services. During the 13-day period ending on October 18, 2,159 inmates were held in institutions or housing units in which the population exceeded capacity at 35 square feet.[8]See 142nd Report of the Court Monitor 0907 104th Report Pursuant to the Court's Order of July 23, 1987, confirmed January 18, 1991.
On October 1, 1990, the daily fine per prisoner reached $310. per day. On February 6, 1991, following the filing of the 142nd Report, which assessed fines for October 3-18, 1990, the court issued an order, sua sponte, limiting the fine to $300 per prisoner, per day. The reason for this order was stated succinctly: "Although it is clear that even increased fines per prisoner have not resulted in full compliance with the relevant provisions of the court's order of January 26, 1987 ... the court has concluded that a continuation of a fine at $300 per prisoner per day constitutes a reasonable, non-punitive sanction that should be sufficient to coerce compliance." February 6, 1991 Order re: 142nd Report at 1. Thus, throughout the labyrinthine course of litigation on this issue, the court at every turn has weighed the nature and breadth of the sanctions imposed and tailored them to their coercive purpose.
III. FINDINGS OF FACT
Defendants premise their motion on a single argument: that because the closing of admissions at the Bayamón 1072 and Miramar facilities led to crowding at other institutions, the government should be granted a "temporary 481 respite" from the ensuing increase in fines. Counsel asserted *481 during oral argument that the Commonwealth would be "willing" to pay $1.2 million monthly for the period of time between October 22, 1990, when admissions were closed at Bayamón 1072, and June 15, 1991, when the AOC expected the facility to be ready to accept admissions once more.[9] It should be noted that at the time the instant order was entered, defendants had not yet petitioned the court for either a modification of its preliminary injunction regarding Bayamón 1072[10] or a modification of the March 5, 1991 stipulation that closed admissions at Miramar.
Because defendants' argument is based on facts well-known to the court, they did not offer testimony or documentary evidence at the May 30 hearing, but instead relied on the oral argument of counsel. Because the issues at hand cannot be addressed without a full understanding of the circumstances that led to the closing of admissions at the two institutions, however, those circumstances bear recitation here.
Bayamón 1072
On October 22, 1990, plaintiffs moved for a temporary restraining order seeking, among other relief, the closing of admissions to Bayamón 1072 until such time as the population of the institution was reduced to its capacity at 55 square feet of 1,648 inmates and running water was available throughout the institution. As the parties and the court were already assembled on the morning of October 22 for the commencement of long-delayed hearings regarding plaintiffs' motion for contempt and defendants' motion for modification regarding the 55 square feet stipulation, the court decided to visit Bayamón immediately.

The situation at the facility shocked the conscience and constituted a graphic illustration of the defendants' complete lack of progress toward rectifying the unconstitutional conditions outlined in the September 8, 1980 preliminary injunction and the March 21, 1986 memorandum opinion. The daily inmate count was 2,069, 421 in excess of the facility's capacity. Crowding was so severe in some buildings that inmates had been assigned to sleep on the floors of shower rooms. Many inmates did not have mattresses and were sleeping on concrete floors, without sheets. The second floor of the institution completely lacked water, leaving over 1000 inmates without toilets, showers, sinks, or drinking water. Water pressure on the first floor was so low that it, too, was without effective plumbing and drinking water. The resultant stench was overwhelming.
Inmates complained, and the institutional superintendent later confirmed, that the prisoners frequently were not provided with three meals a day and that food frequently ran out before all inmates were fed. There were insufficient eating utensils and trays for the inmates, forcing them to eat out of tin cans with their hands. Inmates also lacked basic hygiene supplies, such as soap, toothpaste, toothbrushes, and toilet paper, as well as clothing. [11]
In this rancid setting, overtly mentally ill inmates were mixed with the general population and received no 482 treatment for their *482 illnesses.[12] Inmates also suffered from physical ailments ranging from broken bones to
AIDS. No effort had been made to separate highly contagious prisoners from the general population, and inmates complained of a lack of medical attention.[13]
Faced with these and other patently unconstitutional conditions at Bayamón 1072, the court issued a preliminary injunction from the bench at the close of the October 22 hearing. See October 22, 1991 Preliminary Injunction. The injunction granted a variety of relief to the plaintiff class, including the closure of admissions to the institution until such time as the population was reduced to its institutional capacity and until running water was available in all areas of the prison; the repair and maintenance of all toilets, lavatories, and drinking fountains; the medical evaluation of all inmates and transfer of those with medical needs that could not be met at the facility to appropriate medical settings; the mental health evaluation of all inmates and the transfer of those needing mental health treatment to suitable institutions; the immediate provision of three meals a day to each prisoner; and the immediate provision of bedding, linen, hygienic supplies, and clothing to each prisoner.
Miramar
The Miramar Penal Institution for Young Adults houses inmates between the ages of 16 and 21. It is the only institution in Puerto Rico for young offenders. On January 3, 1991, plaintiffs filed their Emergency Motion for an Order to Show Cause Why the Miramar Penal Institution for Young Adults Should Not be Closed. In their motion, plaintiffs alleged violations of virtually every remedial order issued thus far in this litigation.
Over the course of three days of testimony, the court heard of Dickensian horrors at the institution. In February 1991, Miramar was crowded to well over 200% of its capacity of 147 inmates. In the main dormitory area, two toilets served 300 inmates, many of whom could only use the sanitary facilities if the frequently absent guards agreed to open the padlocked gates between housing units. When they were not granted the privilege of a toilet, inmates relieved themselves in tin cans.
Most inmates had no bed, and many had not even a mattress. None were provided with sheets, towels, or toiletries. The facility's roof leaked, and most of the walls lacked windows, resulting in flooding during the frequent tropical rainstorms.
The youths of Miramar require intensive socio-penal services, which were not provided to them. In addition, inmates went for weeks or months without a single hour of outdoor recreation. Although this court did not enter findings of fact regarding Miramar, the uncontroverted testimony made clear the rampant constitutional violations suffered by inmates at the facility.
Contrary to defendants' assertion during the May 30, 1991 hearing on the instant motion, however, the court did not unilaterally impose the closing of admissions to Miramar. Instead, on March 5, 1991, the parties entered into

a stipulation, which was approved by the court, in which defendants agreed to close admissions to the institution until the population conformed to the facility's capacity at 55 square feet. By this time, four and one-half months after the October 22 injunction had been issued, defendants were well aware of the implications of closing admissions to another facility.
State Penitentiary
Hovering in the background of these proceedings is plaintiffs' May 16, 1991 motion for emergency relief at the State Penitentiary, which has absorbed much of the population overflow from Bayamón 1072 and Miramar and currently is responsible for the bulk of the fines at 35 square feet. See 154th Report, supra, at 2. This motion followed on the heels of the 156th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report on Conditions at the State Penitentiary. 483 Both the *483 motion and the report graphically illustrate conditions of confinement at the penitentiary that mirror those found at Bayamón 1072 and Miramar. So extreme is the degree of physical deterioration and denial of basic services at the facility that the situation could not possibly have arisen out of crowding alone. Instead, it bespeaks ongoing neglect of every aspect of prison administration.
Although the court commenced a hearing on the State Penitentiary motion earlier in the day on May 30, the parties eventually entered into a stipulation in which defendants agreed, inter alia, to close admissions to the facility's two intake units. That the stipulation also permitted the inmates placed in those units to be transferred to building 7 of Bayamón 1072 is ironic and illustrative of the reactive approach that defendants have taken toward this litigation.[14] Rather than working to achieve and maintain compliance with the court's orders, defendants simply are pouring water from one glass into another. In so doing, they are trading institutions off against each other and militating against systemic improvement.
The gist of plaintiffs' opposition to defendants' motion is clear: the court should not reward defendants' knowing creation and perpetuation of pervasive unconstitutional conditions in two institutions by reducing fines designed to coerce compliance with court orders throughout the system. They called two witnesses in support of this position. The first was Charles M. Montgomery, Director of Operations for the AOC. Mr. Montgomery has testified before this court on numerous occasions, and the court consistently has been impressed with his candor concerning problems within the agency and its penal institutions.
Upon questioning by plaintiffs' counsel, Mr. Montgomery stated that correctional systems throughout the country are faced with overcrowding. Most notably, he referred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons, where he was employed for 23 years. As Mr. Montgomery pointed out, however, no system can build itself out of overcrowding, as the AOC is attempting to do.[15] Instead, other means of population reduction must be employed, including but not limited to viable parole, executive clemency, furlough, work and study release, or electronic monitoring programs. Although these programs nominally exist in Puerto Rico, Mr. Montgomery stated that the Commonwealth is "in the dark ages" compared to the Federal Bureau of Prisons in terms of the programs' utilization and effectiveness in crowding reduction. Mr. Montgomery's message was clear: the AOC has the means at its disposal to reduce crowding, and therefore fines, but has elected not to use those means to their full advantage.
Plaintiffs' second witness was Steve J. Martin, a correctional expert. Mr. Martin testified that, in his opinion, a reduction in fines would eliminate much of the coercive force of the court's contempt sanctions.
IV. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Although defendants are seeking "partial and temporary relief from fines," their motion can only be considered a motion for relief from this court's judgment of July 23, 1987 holding them in contempt and imposing sanctions and the two subsequent orders that modified the amount of the fines imposed.[16]See United States v. Work Wear Corp., 602 F.2d 110 (6th Cir. 1979) (motion for reduction of contempt fines considered as motion for 484 modification). As this court has addressed requests *484 for modification by defendants on three prior occasions, it specifically incorporates the analysis set forth in Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 672 F.Supp. 627 (D.P.R.1987) and in its June 7, 1989 Opinion and Order denying modification of the 55 square feet standard and

January 10, 1991 Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Modification and Imposing Sanctions for Contempt. [17]
Rule 60(b)(5) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in relevant part permits the modification of judgments if "it is no longer equitable that the judgment should have prospective application." Although defendants have not stated in their pleadings the basis for their request for relief, the court assumes from their papers and oral argument that they are proceeding under Rule 60(b)(5).[18]
As a threshold matter, the judgment from which relief is sought must be "prospective" in nature. Although few courts have addressed the meaning of "prospective" relief, Justice Cardozo offered a definition in United States v. Swift & Co., from which Rule 60(b) derives. "A continuing decree of injunction directed to events to come is subject always to adaptation as events may shape the need.... The distinction is between restraints that give protection to rights fully accrued upon facts so nearly permanent as to be substantially impervious to change, and those that involve the supervision of changing conduct or conditions and thus are provisional and tentative." 286 U.S. 106, 114, 52 S.Ct. 460, 462, 76 L.Ed. 999 (1932) (citations omitted). In Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia, furthermore, the D.C. Circuit invoked the Swift formulation in holding that an order dismissing a party from the action did not constitute a judgment with "prospective application" pursuant to Rule 6(b)(5); thus, in granting plaintiffs' motion to reinstate the defendant, the district court had abused its discretion.
The order did not compel him to perform, or order him not to perform, any future act; it did not require the court to supervise any continuing interaction between him and the other parties to the case; rather, it definitively discharged [him] from any further involvement in the case.
841 F.2d 1133, 1139 (D.C.Cir.1988).
In the May 30, 1991 hearing on this matter, defendants informed the court that they were only seeking relief from fines accrued during the period beginning on October 23, 1990 and ending on June 15, 1991. Except for the 16day period between May 30 and June 15, the fines from which defendants sought relief had already accrued at the time of the hearing.[19] With the exception of those sixteen days, then, the relief is sought from an order that is no longer executory and thus cannot be considered to have "prospective application."
Even assuming, however, that all the fines defendants seek to avoid satisfy the "prospective application" requirement, they would not be entitled to relief. As the court's September 14, 1987 opinion denying modification of the 35 square feet standard discussed, Rule 60(b)(5) permits modification of equitable decrees when, "after a sustained course of compliance ... changed circumstances make further application of the decree unjust." 485 Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, supra, 672 *485 F.Supp. at 632. The rule derives from the well-recognized power of courts of equity to modify judgments in the face of changed circumstances. Courts have relied traditionally on Justice Cardozo's formulation of the principle in Swift, which is particularly apropos here:
The injunction, whether right or wrong, is not subject to impeachment in its application to the conditions that existed at its making. We are not at liberty to reverse under the guise of readjusting. Life is never static, and the passing of a decade has brought changes.... The inquiry for us is whether the changes are so important that the dangers, once substantial, have become attenuated to a shadow. No doubt the defendants will be better off once the injunction is relaxed, but they are not suffering hardship so extreme and unexpected as to justify us in saying that they are the victims of oppression. Nothing less than a grievous wrong evoked by new and unforeseen conditions should lead us to change what was decreed after years of litigation....
United States v. Swift Co., supra, 286 U.S. at 119, 52 S.Ct. at 465 (emphasis added). The First Circuit has long followed this standard. See Fortin v. Commissioner of Massachusetts Dept. of Public Welfare, 692 F.2d 790, 799 (1st Cir.1982).
Far from being "attenuated," the dangers faced by inmates afforded less than 35 square feet of living space remain as real and "substantial" today as they were when the contempt decree was issued in 1987. As the recent hearings and reports on Bayamón 1072, Miramar, and the State Penitentiary made painfully clear, crowding has contributed to the pervasive structural deterioration, to the shortage of food, utensils, and hygienic supplies, and

to the lack of basic medical and psychiatric care from which inmates continue to suffer. These conditions are not mere shadows of things past; they remain a tangible and constant threat to AOC inmates and staff alike.[20]
Indeed, the "changed circumstances" upon which defendants base their motion derive entirely from their ongoing violation of this court's remedial orders. As outlined in Section III of the instant order, the preliminary injunction that closed admissions to Bayamón 1072 and the stipulated consent decree that closed admissions to Miramar arose out of the court's observations and from testimony pointing to clear violations of not only the crowding stipulation and the eighth amendment but also defendants' court-ordered environmental, medical, and mental health plans.
Confronted with dangers as manifest as those it observed at Bayamón 1072, the court would have been remiss had it not exercised its equitable remedial powers as it did in issuing the October 22 preliminary injunction. Reducing the contempt fines would in essence reward defendants for creating and perpetuating those dangers. As the Third Circuit noted in Mayberry v. Maroney, "The Commonwealth may not now artificially create its own `changed circumstance....'" 558 F.2d 1159, 1163 (3d Cir.1977) (holding that district court abused its discretion in modifying consent decree closing section of state penitentiary).
Nor did the increase in population at the State Penitentiary and subsequent increase in fines that followed the closing of admissions at Bayamón 1072 and Miramar constitute "unforeseen conditions" warranting relief under the Swift standard. The defendants in this case are charged with the overall administration of the correctional system. After twelve years of litigation in this matter, they are well aware of their obligation to comport with the requirements of the eighth amendment and of the court's obligation to uphold it. The potential reverberations of future injunctions on the inmate population were evident at the time the court entered its contempt finding in July 486 1987, and were well within the *486 court's view when it limited the fines to $300 per day in February 1991.[21] See Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292, 296 (7th Cir. 1983) (rise in jail population leading to violation of crowding decree did not constitute unforeseen conditions meriting relief from judgment).
Even under the evolving "flexible standard" for modification in institutional reform litigation, defendants are not entitled to relief. In New York State Association for Retarded Children v. Carey, 706 F.2d 956 (2nd Cir.1983), the district court, relying on Swift, had denied the defendants' motion to modify a consent decree in a manner that would further both the interests of the plaintiff class and the ultimate end of the litigation: the speedy closing of the squalid Willowbrook facility for the mentally retarded. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded, noting,
As experience with this type of litigation increases, a consensus is emerging among commentators in favor of modification with a rather free hand. According to one, the judge who declines to respond flexibly will fail to `respond to the need, present in most institutional reform cases, for phased implementation and small alterations in strategic objectives as new knowledge is acquired.'
706 F.2d at 969, quoting Note, Implementation Problems in Institutional Reform Litigation, 91 Harv.L.Rev. 428, 436 (1977).
Courts that have adopted the Carey standard have been careful to determine whether the modification sought would further the objectives of the litigation. In Kozlowski v. Coughlin, 871 F.2d 241, 266-269 (2d Cir.1989), for example, the Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's refusal to modify a consent decree governing the suspension and termination of inmate contact visits, despite the defendant Commissioner of Corrections' contention that visitation was largely responsible for an increase in drug abuse in the prisons.
To alter the current equation, the Commissioner bears the burden of clearly showing that quantum of necessity needed to convince us of the need for action. This done, he must also show that each change prunes the decree deftly, changing only as much as is required and leaving the ability to obtain the ultimate goal intact.
871 F.2d 241, 248. See Badgley v. Santa-Croce, 853 F.2d 50, 54 (2d Cir.1988); Ruiz v. Lynaugh, 811 F.2d 856, 862 (5th Cir. 1987). Cf. Thompson v. Enomoto, 915 F.2d 1383, 1389 (9th Cir.1990) (district court granting of

plaintiffs' motion for modification of consent decree regarding treatment for death row inmates affirmed; modification needed to effectuate primary goals of the decree).
Defendants in the instant case have not presented a scintilla of evidence to indicate that the sought-after relief from fines would further the singular objective of this litigation: the amelioration of unconstitutional conditions in Puerto Rico's prisons. In fact, they have offered no basis at all for their request other than their own continued violation of the consent decree, upon which the court's finding of contempt was grounded. Accordingly, the Carey standard is inapposite to the matter at hand.
Finally, defendants imply that the amount of the fines itself constitutes an inequity meriting modification. They aver that they would be "willing" to pay $1.2 million dollars per month and that this amount would continue to have a "coercive" impact.
It is axiomatic that if a contumacious party is "willing" to pay a certain amount in fines that the fines by definition are not coercive. See United States v. City of Yonkers, 856 F.2d 444, 460 (2d Cir.1988), cert. granted in part, 489 U.S. 1064, 109 S.Ct. 1337, 103 L.Ed.2d 808 (1989), cert. denied in part, 489 U.S. 1065, 109 S.Ct. 1339, 103 L.Ed.2d 810 (1989), rev'd on other grounds sub nom. Spallone v. United States, 493 U.S. 265, 110 S.Ct. 625, 487 107 L.Ed.2d 644 (1990) ("The need for a substantial *487 daily fine to coerce compliance is demonstrated by the City's announcement to the District Court of its willingness to pay $30 million....") Indeed, the willingness to pay in itself indicates that the party has made an economic (or, in this case, political) decision that it can afford to pay that amount in order to continue down the path of noncompliance. It is only when fines reach the point at which the party is no longer willing to pay, at which noncompliance has become too costly, that the true coercive impact is felt. That defendants in this case are seeking relief now, after nearly four years of paying fines, in itself indicates that the fines have at last achieved their coercive purpose.
The court is fully aware of the magnitude of the fines imposed in this case. Those fines, however, far fall short of the $1 million per day fine sanctioned by the Second Circuit in United States v. City of Yonkers, supra, 856 F.2d at 460. Substantial fines, moreover, are necessary to vindicate the court's authority and "secure compliance with and respect for the court's order." United States v. Work Wear, supra, 602 F.2d at 115. As the First Circuit noted in its September 26, 1989 affirmation of the August 15, 1988 order increasing fines, "the fine, though high, is lawful." Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 887 F.2d 1, 6 (1st Cir.1989).
In its opinion, the Court of Appeals pointed out that,
since the purpose of the sanction in this case is to induce compliance with the court order, its reasonableness depends upon `the character and magnitude of the harm threatened by the continued contumacy, and the probable effectiveness of any suggested sanction in bringing about the result desired.'
Id. at 6, quoting United States v. United Mine Workers, 330 U.S. 258, 304, 67 S.Ct. 677, 701, 91 L.Ed. 884 (1947) . As the situations at Bayamón 1072, Miramar, and the State Penitentiary make clear, the "character and magnitude of the harm threatened by [defendants'] continued contumacy" could not be greater. This court has twelve years of experience with that contumacy, and is firmly convinced of the need to continue sanctions at least at their current level if compliance with its orders is ever to be achieved.
WHEREFORE, it is hereby
ORDERED, that for the reasons set forth in this memorandum opinion, defendants' motion for partial and temporary relief from fines should be, and is, DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
[1] For a detailed history of the pertinent orders and stipulations regarding crowding, see section II, infra.
[2] "Open celling" refers to a practice in which cell doors remain open 24 hours per day, allowing inmates free access to adjacent corridor space, under certain conditions. See September 8, 1986 stipulation, Article 3.

[3] The September 1986 stipulation and order also set a January 1, 1988 deadline for system-wide compliance with the 55 square feet standard. After three years of motions for modification of the order and court-ordered postponements of the deadline, defendants were held in contempt for their failure to provide the required amount of space on January 10, 1991. See Morales Feliciano v. Hernández Colón, 754 F.Supp. 942 (D.P.R.1991), appeal docketed, No. 91-1206 (1st Cir. March 5, 1991).
Because the January 10 order currently is pending before the Court of Appeals, plaintiffs argue and defendants concede that this court is divested of jurisdiction to modify it. The fines assessed for violations of the 55 square feet standard thus are not before the court at this time.
[4] As early as August 1987, when the first fines were imposed, the court recognized their potential magnitude. It thus limited the assessment of fines to the excess number of inmates in a particular institution or housing unit rather than to the entire population of the institution or unit. See August 14, 1987 order at 2.
[5] In the same motion, plaintiffs asked the court to reconsider its August 14, 1987 decision to only assess fines vis-á-vis population in excess of the stipulated capacity. After careful consideration, the court once again refused this request, recognizing the potentially "staggering" amount of such fines. It remarked, however, that "perhaps, eventually, the court will have no choice but to adopt such a draconian measure." August 15, 1988 order at 6.
It is worth noting that the population of the State Penitentiary in August 1988 was 1638, or roughly 146.25% of its capacity at 35 square feet. Id. at 4. This is almost identical to the facility's population level in March 1991. See 156th Report of the Court Monitors 0907 Report on Conditions at the State Penitentiary.
[6] See Amended Good Time Credit Law, 4 L.P.R.A. 1162, 1165 (amended July 20, 1989).
[7] See April 28, 1988 order at 1 (creating Expedited Bail Project).
[8] The injunction pertaining to Bayamón 1072 was issued on October 23, 1991. Thus, the increase in fines was not, as defendants contend, directly attributable to the closing of admissions at that facility. Instead, the spiral already had begun its upward climb. See section III, infra.
[9] This amount derived from the Court Monitor's 142nd Report, which assessed fines in the amount of $647,700. for a 13-day period preceeding the issuance of the October 23 preliminary injunction. See defendants' May 6, 1991 motion, para. 14, at 9; see also February 6, 1991 order at 2. The most recent fines assessed against defendants for violations of the 35 square feet standard totaled $1,349,700. for the fourteen-day period commencing January 10, 1991 and ending January 23, 1991. See 154th Report of the Court Monitor 0907 110th Report Pursuant to the Court's Order of July 23, 1987, confirmed May 3, 1991.
[10] The court has agreed, however, to reopen partially admissions to buildings 7 and 4, pursuant to a stipulation of the parties regarding plaintiffs' May 16, 1991 Motion for Emergency Relief and for an Order to Show Cause Why the Rio Piedras State Penitentiary Should Not Be Enjoined from Admitting Any New Arrivals and for Other Relief. See note 12, infra.
[11] These conditions constituted pervasive violations of both the September 8, 1980 preliminary injunction and the defendants' environmental plan. See Eightieth Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report Recommending Adoption of Environmental Plan, Appendix A, confirmed March 30, 1990.
[12] See generally Amended 62nd Report of the Court Monitor 0907 Report Recommending Adoption of Medical and Mental Health Plans, Appendix B, confirmed January 2, 1990.
[13] See generally id. at Appendix A.
[14] The court's decision to permit the partial reopening of building 7 was based on Mr. Montgomery's testimony that it was "substantially repaired." This testimony was not refuted by plaintiffs. The stipulation also permitted building 4 to be reopened for use as an "incentive unit" for inmate workers at the facility, pursuant to Mr. Montgomery's testimony.

[15] Defendants' most recent attempt to comply with the September 26, 1986 order involves the building of 1000 "temporary" minimum custody beds at three penal camps. For a lengthy discussion of this proposal, see January 10, 1991 Memorandum Opinion and Order Denying Modification and Imposing Sanctions for Contempt at 8-14.
[16] See August 15, 1988 Order Increasing Fines and February 6, 1991 Order re: 142nd Report of the Court Monitor 0907 105th Report Pursuant to the Court's Order of July 23, 1987.
[17] The court recognizes that its prior opinions addressed motions to modify a stipulated consent decree. The legal analysis set forth in those opinions, however, is equally relevant to the instant motion. See generally C. Wright and A. Miller, Federal Practice and Procedure secs. 2863-2864 (2d ed. 1987), which draws no distinction between modification of consent decrees and modification of other orders.
[18] Rule 60(b)(6) constitutes a residual exception and allows modification for "any other reason justifying relief from the judgment." Courts frequently have not distinguished between the two subsection in discussing modification, and for all practical purposes this discussion pertains equally to both. See, e.g., Duran v. Elrod, 713 F.2d 292 (7th Cir.1983); Mayberry v. Maroney, 558 F.2d 1159 (3d Cir.1977).
[19] Due to delays in the reporting of the inmate population counts and the Court Monitor's subsequent assessment of the fines, defendants had been ordered to pay only for those violations that had occurred up to January 23, 1991. The obligation to pay the fines, however, vests at the end of each day upon which a violation occurs.
[20] Rather than a "sustained course of compliance," the most recent monitor's report on crowding indicated that between January 10 and January 23, 1991, 4,499 prisoners were being held in institutions or housing units in violation of the 35 square feet standard. See 154th Report at 2.
[21] As defendants' pleadings correctly point out, the court exercised its discretion and reduced fines in light of truly unforeseen circumstances in 1989, when Hurricane Hugo forced the agency to house inmates at the State Penitentiary in excess of its capacity at 35 square feet. The distinction between that situation and the one at hand is self-evident.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 378 F.3d 42 (2004)
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v.
John A. RULLAN, Secretary of the Puerto Rico Department of Health, et al., Defendant, Appellant.
No. 04-1300.
United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.
Heard June 7, 2004. Decided August 6, 2004.
4345 *43 *44 *45 Carlos A. Del Valle Cruz, with whom Anabelle Rodriguez, Secretary of Justice, Eileen Landron Guardiola, Eduardo A. Vera Ramirez, and Landron & Vera, LLP, were on brief, for appellant.
Carlos V. Garcia Gutierrez, with whom Alejandra Bird Lopez, Manuel A. Rodriguez Banchs, Ricardo Alfonso Garcia, and Civil Action and Education Corporation were on brief, for appellees.
Before SELYA, LYNCH and LIPEZ, Circuit Judges.
SELYA, Circuit Judge.
Like the legendary Phoenix, this class action litigation involving prison conditions in Puerto Rico is seemingly incapable of eternal rest. The iteration now before us focuses on prospective injunctive relief ordered by the district court in 1998 (the centerpiece of which is the proposed privatization of medical and mental health care throughout the correctional system). Despite his predecessor's enthusiastic assent to that arrangement, the Commonwealth's Secretary of Health (the Secretary), acting in his official capacity, sought five years later to vacate or terminate the consent decree embodying that relief.[1] Following an evidentiary hearing, the district court rejected that initiative. Morales Feliciano v. Calderon Serra, 300 F.Supp.2d 321 (D.P.R.2004) (Morales IV). The Secretary now attacks this decision on several fronts. He asserts, inter alia, that the court acted ultra vires; that the court's 1998 order was void ab initio for failure to meet the requirements of section 802 of the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321-66, § 802 (1996), codified at 18 U.S.C. § 3626; and that in all events, the order should be terminated because the district court's supportive factfinding was clearly erroneous and infected by errors of law. As a fallback, he argues that the district court bungled the evidentiary hearing and that, at a bare minimum, the matter should be remanded for reconsideration. Finding these importunings unpersuasive, we affirm the decision below.
I. BACKGROUND
Given the long and tortuous history of this litigation 0907 two years ago, we acknowledged that "the lore of this case is Byzantine," Morales Feliciano v. Rullan, 303 F.3d 1, 3 (1st Cir.2002) (Morales III) 0907 we confine our introductory comments to those events that are most directly germane to this appeal. The shelves of any well-stocked law library will satisfy the appetites of readers who hunger for more exegetic detail. See, e.g., Morales III, 303 F.3d 1; Morales-Feliciano v. Parole Bd., 887 F.2d 1 (1st Cir.1989); Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d 321; Morales Feliciano v. Rossello Gonzalez, 124 F.Supp.2d 774 (D.P.R.2000); Morales Feliciano v. Rossello Gonzalez, 13 F.Supp.2d 151 (D.P.R.1998) (Morales II); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 775 F.Supp. 487 (D.P.R.1991); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 775 F.Supp. 477 (D.P.R.1991); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 771 F.Supp. 11 (D.P.R.1991); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 754 F.Supp. 942 (D.P.R.1991); Morales 46 Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 704 F.Supp. 16 (D.P.R.1988); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez *46 Colon, 697 F.Supp. 51 (D.P.R.1988); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 672 F.Supp. 627 (D.P.R.1987); Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 697 F.Supp. 26 (D.P.R.1986); Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F.Supp.

591 (D.P.R.1986); Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 605 F.Supp. 967 (D.P.R.1985); Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.P.R.1979) (Morales I).
In the 1970s, a group of prison inmates initiated a class action alleging "dire shortcomings in virtually every aspect of prisoner confinement" in the Puerto Rican correctional system. Morales III, 303 F.3d at 3. The district court found the plaintiffs likely to succeed on the merits and issued preliminary injunctive relief. Morales I, 497 F.Supp. at 39-41. The defendants made little progress and the district court, in March of 1986, appointed a monitor. See Morales III, 303 F.3d at 3; Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F.Supp. at 621. The court charged the monitor with studying various elements of the correctional system and recommending remedial action. With the monitor's assistance, the court became more proactive and issued a torrent of orders, including temporary restrainers and contempt citations. The court thereafter imposed multimillion dollar fines for the most egregious failures to comply with its directives.
In 1990, the court ordered the implementation of medical and mental health care plans recommended by the monitor. These plans transferred the primary responsibility for medical and mental health care in the correctional system from the Administrator of Corrections (the AOC) to the Secretary. The plans also required that the Secretary employ for a minimum of three years a chief health care coordinator (the CHCC) who would bear responsibility for easing the transition and coordinating compliance.
Over time, prison conditions improved. In 1996, the district court entered a partial final judgment that settled several disputed issues and urged attempts at consensus-based compliance efforts as to other issues. Despite improvements in many areas, the delivery of medical and mental health care lagged behind.
In April of 1997, a court-appointed expert found the existing health care programs incapable of meeting constitutional standards and suggested, as an alternative, the appointment of a receiver. The parties (who, over a quarter of a century, have agreed on little else) unanimously opposed this recommendation. They suggested instead the formation of a private non-profit corporation to provide medical and mental health services to the inmate population. On September 26, 1997, the parties drafted, executed, and filed a stipulation embodying this consensus. Under the terms of the stipulation, a non-profit corporation was to be formed. The corporation would be structured to provide health care services, consistent with the 1990 plan, to all individuals held in institutions operated by the AOC. The stipulation pledged the parties' full cooperation, required the Secretary and the AOC to lay the groundwork for a transition, and offered to subject the process of privatization to the supervision of the district court. Finally, the stipulation memorialized the parties' agreement to engage in further discussions concerning the role and authority of the CHCC.
The district court endorsed the stipulation and, thus, assumed ownership of the privatization plan that had been conceived by the parties. See Morales III, 303 F.3d at 3-4; see also Morales II, 13 F.Supp.2d at 212-14 (justifying the adoption of the privatization remedy by elaborating on the grave constitutional deficiencies that continued to 47 haunt the existing programs). The order, as it pertains to this appeal, has *47 retained its original substance. The non-profit entity, known as the Correctional Health Services Corporation (the CHSC), has been formed.
The parties and the district court envisioned the CHSC as a key piece of the privatization machinery. Withal, the CHSC was intended as a transitional device rather than as the exclusive provider of inmate health care services in perpetuity. The parties expected that within a few years of its full implementation, the CHSC would compete with private health care providers for contracts to furnish health care services to those persons held in the AOC's custody. This expectation remains in force.
The CHSC has a checkered history. Originally, the parties hoped that it would begin to function as early as July 1, 1998, and become fully operational as a provider of health care to the inmate population by the end of that year. That prediction proved wildly optimistic. Although the district court, using accrued fines, has made substantial funding available to the CHSC 0907 as of the date of the district court's decision, roughly $55,000,000 had been spent on the privatization solution 0907 this monetary infusion has not yet brought the project to fruition. While the CHSC has made substantial progress toward reaching its stated goals, the pace has been much slower than anticipated. To this point, the CHSC has developed an administrative infrastructure, fashioned an impressive set of substantive programs, and constructed needed facilities. As a result, it has begun contributing to the management of payroll, staff assignments, inventory, purchasing, billing, and financing. The CHSC's

achievements in formulating substantive programs include the creation of an electronic database for health records, patient tracking, and the keeping of appointments; the design of a telemedicine program to enable remote diagnosis and treatment of psychiatric illnesses; and the training of personnel to maximize the efficacy of these (and other) programs. The CHSC also has improved the quality of the facilities and equipment dedicated to the provision of inmate health care. In the same vein, it has purchased and installed computers at most of the institutions operated by the AOC. Last 0907 but far from least 0907 it is in the process of developing a new acute care hospital.
Without in any way minimizing either the value or extent of these accomplishments, it is evident that the CHSC has lagged far behind the timetable that its proponents originally envisioned. Part of the reason is that court supervision has made the process cumbersome (for example, lengthy periods of time have been consumed in the submission and approval of budget proposals). Other factors, such as snail's-pace negotiations with outside contractors, false starts, and resistance to change, have contributed to the delay. Though this lag time may have been unavoidable, the fact remains that, to this date, not a single patient has been treated by the CHSC.
On October 1, 2003, the Secretary, emphasizing this protracted period of delay and the mounting costs of completing the necessary infrastructure, filed a motion under the PLRA to vacate or terminate the privatization component of the extant consent decree. The plaintiffs cross-moved to modify the medical and mental health plans by terminating sections of the decree that assigned the primary responsibility for inmate health care to the Secretary. See Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 342-43. The cross-motion went unopposed and the district court granted it. Id. at 343.
Following an evidentiary hearing on the main motion, the court found that pervasive and persistent constitutional 48 violations *48 continued to shackle the delivery of health care in Puerto Rico's correctional system. Id. at 323-31.
The court also found that the contemplated relief 0907 privatization 0907 satisfied the requirements of the PLRA. Id. at 331-38. Accordingly, the court upheld the challenged portion of the consent decree and directed the AOC to meet with the plaintiff class and submit a further plan for achieving constitutional compliance. Id. at 344-45. The Secretary now appeals.[2]
II. APPELLATE JURISDICTION
We start by clarifying the extent of our jurisdiction. It is beyond serious question that we have jurisdiction over the main elements of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1) (conferring jurisdiction over interlocutory orders refusing to terminate injunctions). The Secretary, however, has also attempted to raise a tangential issue. With regard to that issue, appellate jurisdiction is more problematic.
The circumstances are as follows. As part of its ruling below, the district court ordered the AOC to "meet [with the plaintiff class] and file with the Court within forty-five (45) days... a plan on how the [AOC] will assume his legal responsibility to provide health care to inmates." Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 345. The Secretary asserts that this order, ex proprio vigore, violates the PLRA and contravenes Supreme Court precedent regarding limitations on the power of federal courts to enforce state law against state officers. Pennhurst State Sch. & Hosp. v. Halderman, 465 U.S. 89, 117, 104 S.Ct. 900, 79 L.Ed.2d 67 (1984) ("[A] federal suit against state officials on the basis of state law contravenes the Eleventh Amendment when ... the relief sought and ordered has an impact directly on the State itself."). We cannot reach the merits of these claims for we have no jurisdiction over them.
This result is largely dictated by the rationale of our decision in a prior phase of this seemingly endless litigation. In Morales III, we ruled that an order that "was within the lower court's reserved power to establish procedures for compliance with the court's earlier decrees" was not immediately appealable. 303 F.3d at 10. That reasoning is apposite here. A necessary correlate of the lower court's duty to supervise the ongoing process of privatization is the power to issue subsidiary orders in aid of that objective. We thus have no jurisdiction to entertain an interlocutory appeal from this portion of the court's decision (or even to consider the plaintiffs' contention that the Secretary lacks standing to register such a protest).[3]

III. THE MERITS
We proceed to examine the remainder of the Secretary's asseverational array. He has loosed a scattershot attack. Only four of his claims are worthy of extended discussion, namely, (i) that the lower court lacked general equitable power to grant a privatization remedy; (ii) that the PLRA mandates vacation of the 1998 order as void 49 ab initio; (iii) that, after almost five years of wheel-spinning, the PLRA now *49 mandates termination of the prospective relief; and (iv) that the court repeatedly erred in the course of the evidentiary hearing.[4] We address these issues (some of which have subparts) sequentially.
A. General Equitable Powers.
The Secretary's first broadside need not detain us. He posits that the relief ordered here is an invalid exercise of federal equitable power. Because this argument presents a purely legal issue, it engenders de novo review. See Sunshine Dev., Inc. v. FDIC, 33 F.3d 106, 111 (1st Cir.1994).
At the outset, we note that this argument quite likely is by the boards. The Secretary's predecessor in office stipulated to the privatization remedy, and there is no claim that he lacked authority to do so. Normally, that would constitute a waiver, which would prevent the Secretary from making this argument altogether.
Even if the Secretary is not bound by his predecessor's acquiescence 0907 a matter on which we take no view 0907 the Secretary did not present this argument to the district court and attempts to raise it for the first time on appeal. "It is a bedrock rule that when a party has not presented an argument to the district court, [he] may not unveil it in the court of appeals." United States v. Slade, 980 F.2d 27, 30 (1st Cir.1992). At the least, then, the argument is forfeited.
We nonetheless inquire briefly into the merits, as forfeited arguments (unlike waived arguments) ordinarily warrant review for plain error. Gomez v. Rivera Rodriguez, 344 F.3d 103, 118 (1st Cir.2003). That type of review "entails four showings: (1) that an error occurred (2) which was clear or obvious and which not only (3) affected the [appellant's] substantial rights, but also (4) seriously impaired the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of judicial proceedings." United States v. Duarte, 246 F.3d 56, 60 (1st Cir.2001).
The Secretary concedes that injunctions 0907 like this one 0907 that have been issued pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 are limited only by the court's inherent equitable powers. See, e.g., Giles v. Harris, 189 U.S. 475, 486, 23 S.Ct. 639, 47 L.Ed. 909 (1903) (Holmes, J.). He insists, however, that a federal court's equitable powers are restricted to the remedies that were available in equity in 1789 (at the time of the passage of the First Judiciary Act). This proposition is a correct statement of the law, see Grupo Mexicano de Desarrollo v. Alliance Bond Fund, Inc., 527 U.S. 308, 318-19, 119 S.Ct. 1961, 144 L.Ed.2d 319 (1999), but the Secretary's application of it fails plain error review.
50 Specifically, the Secretary characterizes privatization as "a fairly recent endeavor" *50 and claims, therefore, that there is no reasonable basis for holding that court-imposed privatization of duties ordinarily ascribed to the government is within the district court's armamentarium. Appellant's Br. at 29. If this crabbed view reflected the state of the law, equitable remedies would be frozen in time and new remedial applications could never be developed to meet contemporary needs. The view, however, is fundamentally at odds with the core principle that equity must evolve over time "in order to meet the requirements of every case, and to satisfy the needs of a progressive social condition in which new primary rights and duties are constantly arising and new kinds of wrongs are constantly committed." Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pac. Ry. Co., 163 U.S. 564, 601, 16 S.Ct. 1173, 41 L.Ed. 265 (1896).
Consistent with this principle, the Supreme Court has made clear that the inquiry into the availability of equitable relief in a particular case focuses upon whether the general manner of relief sought was available at equity in 1789. See Grupo Mexicano, 527 U.S. at 322, 119 S.Ct. 1961. This inquiry is informed by a recognition that equity

is flexible and that the boundaries of permissible relief are broad. Id. Thus, the relevant question is not whether a specific application of relief was available in 1789, but, rather, whether that general type of relief was available.
In this case, the answer to that question is affirmative. At bottom, the endorsed anodyne 0907 privatization 0907 calls for relief in the nature of a mandatory injunction, and injunctive relief is a classic equitable remedy. Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co. v. Knudson, 534 U.S. 204, 211 n. 1, 122 S.Ct. 708, 151 L.Ed.2d 635 (2002); Mertens v. Hewitt Assocs., 508 U.S. 248, 256, 113 S.Ct. 2063, 124 L.Ed.2d 161 (1993); Griggs v. E.I. Dupont de Nemours & Co., 237 F.3d 371, 384 (4th Cir.2001). A survey of contemporary applications of this rule supports this conclusion. Courts consistently have upheld relief in equity notwithstanding the fact that the particular remedial application was not available in 1789. School busing orders exemplify this point. See, e.g., Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Bd. of Educ., 402 U.S. 1, 30, 91 S.Ct. 1267, 28 L.Ed.2d 554 (1971); Morgan v. Kerrigan, 530 F.2d 401, 414-15 (1st Cir.1976). If the Secretary's argument were sound, all such orders would be beyond the equitable power of a federal court.
The short of it is that a federal district court, faced with pervasive and persistent constitutional violations, has not only the power but also the duty to render a decree that will, insofar as is possible, return matters to a constitutionally acceptable level. While the privatization remedy constitutes extraordinary relief and can be justified in only the most exceptional circumstances, the nature of the remedy is no different than that of a garden-variety mandatory injunction. Seen in this light, we conclude that the district court did not commit plain error in determining that it had the authority to approve and implement a privatization remedy jointly proposed by the parties.
B. Compliance with the PLRA.
In 1996, Congress enacted the PLRA, partially in an effort to curb the involvement of the federal judiciary in dayto-day prison management. See 141 Cong. Rec. 13,319 (1995) (statement of Sen. Abraham); id. at 14,418 (statement of Sen. Hatch). This ambient intent must guide our interpretation of the statutory text. See Inmates of Suffolk County Jail v. Rouse, 129 F.3d 649, 655 (1st Cir.1997).
The PLRA establishes standards for the entry and termination of all prospective relief in civil actions challenging 51 prison *51 conditions. See Miller v. French, 530 U.S. 327, 333, 120 S.Ct. 2246, 147 L.Ed.2d 326 (2000). The term
"prospective relief" encompasses "all relief other than compensatory monetary damages." 18 U.S.C. § 3626(g) (7). The statute requires that prospective relief "shall extend no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right of a particular plaintiff or plaintiffs." Id. § 3626(a)(1). It further provides that a federal court "shall not grant or approve any prospective relief unless the court finds that such relief is narrowly drawn, extends no further than necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right, and is the least intrusive means necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right." Id. A party is entitled to immediate termination of any relief that has been granted in the absence of findings as to these criteria. Id. § 3626(b)(2). Conversely, however, prospective relief "shall not terminate if the court makes written findings based on the record that prospective relief [meets the above requirements]." Id. § 3626(b)(3).
This statutory backdrop provides the setting for the Secretary's next challenge to the propriety of the privatization order. This challenge has three foci, each spawned by the PLRA. We deal with them in order.
1. Validity of the 1998 Order. The Secretary first argues that, when originally entered in 1998, the order approving privatization did not meet the PLRA's requirements and, thus, "must be set aside without further consideration." Appellant's Br. at 31. Because the district court did not make the findings specifically required by the PLRA coincident with the entry of its 1998 order, the Secretary's thesis runs, the order was void ab initio.[5]
The Secretary's thesis hinges on the premise that when prospective relief does not meet the PLRA's requirements at the moment of issuance, the decree is void without reference to the statutory termination procedure. On this premise, the termination procedure applies only to (i) prospective relief entered before the effective date of the PLRA and (ii) prospective relief entered after that date which is accompanied by the requisite narrowness-need-intrusiveness findings. Prospective relief entered after the PLRA's effective date but unaccompanied by narrowness-need-intrusiveness findings is simply void.

There is no textual support for the Secretary's position. He relies on the mandatory language of 18 U.S.C. § 3626 (a), which states that "[t]he court shall not grant or approve any prospective relief" in the absence of specific findings. But this subsection sets forth the standard district courts must follow when determining whether prospective relief not yet ordered is permitted by the PLRA. Gilmore v. California, 220 F.3d 987, 999 (9th Cir.2000) ("If prospective relief has already been granted by a court, § 3626(b) controls."). Here, however, privatization constitutes the status quo (and the Secretary advanced no PLRA-based argument at the time that privatization was originally approved).
52 *52 The only authority cited by the Secretary 0907 Rouse 0907 does not support his point of view. He asserts that Rouse drew a distinction between orders issued prior to the enactment of the PLRA and those issued subsequent thereto. That is incorrect. Rouse drew a distinction between "existing federal court orders" and those "not yet obtained." 129 F.3d at 654. That distinction contradicts the position that the Secretary advocates in this appeal.
Accordingly, we hold that the procedure limned in 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b) applies to any existing prospective relief, regardless of when that relief was first ordered. See Miller, 530 U.S. at 333, 120 S.Ct. 2246 (stating that section 3626(b) applies to "existing injunctions"); Harvey v. Schoen, 245 F.3d 718, 720 (8th Cir.2001) (holding that prospective relief made "in the absence of the required findings" is immediately terminable "regardless of when ordered"); see also Rouse, 129 F.3d at 654 (suggesting that the termination procedures set forth in section 3626 (b) apply to all existing federal court orders).
Since privatization is required by a preexisting court order, the situation is controlled by subsection (b), not subsection (a). See Rouse, 129 F.3d at 654. That makes a significant difference. Nothing in subsection (b) or in its legislative history speaks of vacating consent decrees but only of terminating them. That linguistic shift has practical consequences. "While terminating a consent decree strips it of future potency, the decree's past puissance is preserved...." Id. at 662.
That gets the grease from the goose. Although 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b) entitles a defendant to termination of existing prospective relief ordered in the absence of the requisite findings, that proviso excepts cases in which the court supportably finds that the particular form of prospective relief remains at the time of the challenge narrowly tailored, necessary, and relatively unintrusive. See id.; see also Guajardo v. Tex. Dep't of Crim. Justice, 363 F.3d 392, 394 (5th Cir.2004) (per curiam). There is no time limitation present in section 3626(b)(2), nor does its language suggest that it reaches only those orders issued prior to the PLRA's effective date.
To cinch matters, section 3626(b) provides that any order made in the absence of the required findings is subject to "immediate termination." This word choice is significant. See Rouse, 129 F.3d at 662. The verb "terminate" means "to put an end to" or "to end." Black's Law Dictionary 1482 (7th ed., 1999). If Congress had intended that orders issued in the absence of the required findings be void ab initio, it would almost certainly have chosen a phrase such as "void."
To sum up, the PLRA grants the Secretary a right to move for the termination of prospective relief. The PLRA does not, however, confer any right to argue, five years after the fact, that an order should be deemed void ab initio for lack of contemporaneous findings. Therefore, this aspect of the Secretary's challenge founders.
2. The Constitutional Violations. Upon a motion to terminate prospective injunctive relief under the PLRA, a court may continue the relief only if it supportably finds that there are ongoing constitutional violations. 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b). The district court purposed to make such findings in this instance. See Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 323-31, 342. The Secretary counters that the record does not show infirmities sufficient to justify ongoing relief and that the district court's contrary findings are clearly erroneous.
53 An inquiry into whether current prison conditions constitute an ongoing violation *53 of a federal right "comprises a mixed question of fact and law, the answer to which we review along a degree-of-deference continuum, ranging from plenary review for law-dominated questions to clear-error review for fact-dominated questions." Rouse, 129 F.3d at 661. Here, the question is fact-intensive 0907 the Secretary frontally challenges the lower court's factfinding 0907 so our standard of review is deferential. See id.; see also Dedham Water Co. v. Cumberland Farms Dairy, Inc., 972 F.2d 453, 457 (1st Cir.1992) (admonishing that appellate courts should respect the trial court's findings of fact

unless convinced, after a careful review of the record, that a mistake has been made). If there are two permissible views of the evidence, the factfinder's choice between them must be respected. See Fed. Refin. Co. v. Klock, 352 F.3d 16, 29 (1st Cir.2003). The lower court's factual findings easily pass muster under this deferential standard.
We have painstakingly reviewed the record and examined the numerous findings of fact, mindful that a trial court generally is considered the most informed interpreter of its own prior rulings and findings. See Rouse, 129 F.3d at 661. In this instance, the court was very careful to update the record and to consider the ways in which conditions had changed since its original endorsement of the privatization concept. See Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 323-31. The court painted a compelling, record-rooted picture of how and in what respects health care for inmates in Puerto Rican prisons remains constitutionally deficient. See id. On this grim record, it is simply implausible to suggest that these findings are clearly erroneous.
The district court characterized the denial of medical and mental health services as "massive and systematic." Id. at 324. That characterization seems apt. No useful purpose would be served by rehearsing the court's findings in minute detail. We offer instead a few of the more glaring examples. As of 2003, one-fourth of all inmates who requested sick call did not get it; only 55% of all ambulatory care appointments actually took place; only 49% of specialist consultations deemed necessary for serious conditions were arranged; as a rule, medically prescribed diets for inmates were habitually ignored; only 31.3% of inmates who had been diagnosed HIV-positive were receiving treatment; and inmate mortality rates were rising. See id. at 323-31. These are but the tip of a particularly unattractive iceberg. Despite the CHSC's efforts, physical facilities for inmate health care remain inadequate and there is an acute shortage of psychiatric expertise. See id. at 326-27, 331. Basic health care is critical to maintaining a decent quality of life, and Puerto Rico's correctional system is not delivering a constitutionally acceptable level of health care to its captive population.
We acknowledge that in the course of making these findings, the district court largely disregarded the testimony of the Secretary's expert witness as lacking in credibility. Although the Secretary complains bitterly about this rejection, it is hornbook law that matters of credibility are ordinarily for the court of first instance, not for the appellate court. Laurent v. Ashcroft, 359 F.3d 59, 64 (1st Cir.2004). Unless the record mandates a contrary finding 0907 and this record most assuredly does not 0907 the court of appeals ought not disturb a trial court's credibility determination. See Anthony v. Sundlun, 952 F.2d 603, 606 (1st Cir.1991); see also 9A Charles Alan Wright & Arthur R. Miller, Federal Practice & Procedure § 2586 (2d ed.1994) (collecting cases). Here, moreover, there is 54 much to commend the *54 district court's assessment of the witness's dubious credibility (for example, the witness provided haphazard and inconsistent testimony and, on cross-examination, withdrew or corrected a myriad of statements).
The Secretary accurately observes that some noteworthy advances have been made in the delivery of health care to inmates. He overlooks, however, that notwithstanding these improvements, the district court found substantial deficiencies attendant to virtually every aspect of the inmate health care system. Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 324. However laudable the advances may be, the district court's supportable finding that constitutional violations persist suffices to satisfy the requirements of the PLRA and to justify a comprehensive injunctive decree.
To say more on this subject would be supererogatory. We hold, without serious question, that the district court's findings and conclusions about the incidence of continuing constitutional violations are adequately anchored in the record.
3. The Narrowness-Need-Intrusiveness Findings. The PLRA mandates "the termination of extant consent decrees altogether unless the district court makes the specific findings that are necessary to keep a particular decree alive." Rouse, 129 F.3d at 655. In addition to ongoing constitutional violations, this compendium includes a finding that the ordered relief satisfies the statutory narrowness-need-intrusiveness criteria. See 18 U.S.C. § 3626(b). The district court made such findings here. See Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 342. The Secretary argues that the facts of this case, as found, require termination of the decree because the chosen remedy 0907 privatization 0907 does not meet the narrowness, need, and intrusiveness requirements delineated in the PLRA.

Congress plainly intended the PLRA to operate as a mechanism that would decrease federal judicial involvement in prison administration. See Rouse, 129 F.3d at 655. Congress left room, however, for needed injunctive relief. The Secretary's insistence that Congress did not want courts involved in prison administration begs the real question 0907 which is whether a particular set of facts, measured under the statutorily specified criteria, warrants continued judicial involvement. We think that this is a close call in the case at hand, but for the time being, we find supportable the district court's conclusions regarding narrowness, need, and lack of intrusiveness.
The narrowness-need-intrusiveness criteria are, to some extent, self-explicating. The devil is in the details attendant to their application. The application of those criteria is case-specific and must be undertaken in light of both the magnitude of existing constitutional violations and the available remedial alternatives.[6]See, e.g., Clement v. Cal. Dep't of Corrections, 364 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th Cir.2004). The constitutional violations here are substantial in both scope and degree. They have defied correction for more than two decades. The district court has tried more conventional measures, but found them wanting. It has afforded the Commonwealth ample 55 opportunity to bring preexisting mechanisms up to speed or otherwise to correct *55 the phalanx of problems. It has witnessed the Commonwealth's continued inability to cure the constitutional infirmities plaguing the delivery of health care in the correctional system. This record of abject failure matters in the narrowness-needintrusiveness inquiry. See Benjamin v. Fraser, 343 F.3d 35, 49 (2d Cir.2003) (upholding narrowness-needintrusiveness findings "in light of the district court's finding that the [defendant's] compliance with its remedial responsibilities has been consistently incomplete and inadequate").
The need for continued prospective injunctive relief is patent. The lower court has been dealing with the deficiencies of Puerto Rico's correctional system since 1979, and we acknowledge that the sheer passage of so much time counsels restraint in ordering further extensions of prospective injunctive relief. See, e.g., Spangler v. Pasadena City Bd. of Educ., 611 F.2d 1239, 1241 (9th Cir.1979). However, the correctional system is sprawling, the problems with which the court has had to grapple are massive, the Commonwealth's acceptance of the need for reforms has ranged from inconsistent to grudging (witness the current state of affairs in which the AOC embraces privatization as the Secretary seeks to dismantle it), and progress has been correspondingly slow. Insofar as health care is concerned, the level of improvement still falls well short of bringing serious violations into constitutional compliance. Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 323-31. In some respects, backsliding has occurred. See id. at 324. In light of these facts, we have no difficulty affirming the district court's finding that a need for ongoing injunctive relief exists.
We next consider the district court's findings regarding narrow tailoring and lack of intrusiveness. In 2003, the district court was keenly aware of its duty to ensure that prospective remediation complies with the PLRA's requirements. See Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 331. It was, however, faced with a constitutional crisis and only three proposed solutions: turning back the health care clock to reinstate the system that had failed miserably for two decades, placing the system into receivership, or persisting with the plan for privatization (which the parties had conceived and to which they originally had agreed). The status quo ante alternative had proven to be ineffective, and, thus, was undesirable. No one favored the receivership alternative. That left privatization. Against this mise-en-scene, we cannot say that the lower court's choice of that alternative was unreasonable.
The Secretary nonetheless argues that privatization is much broader than necessary to forfend against cruel and unusual treatment of inmates. If this were the district court's first attempt at remediation, we quite likely would agree. But the district court has attempted narrower, less intrusive alternatives 0907 and those alternatives have failed to restore the constitutional balance. For this reason, a more innovative remedy is justifiable. The increased intrusiveness and broader scope of the privatization remedy is a direct response to the unique need created by the Commonwealth's own failure 0907 for more than twenty years 0907 to correct serious constitutional inadequacies. Drastic times call for drastic measures.
The Secretary has one final shot in his sling. He laments that privatization is far behind schedule and has accomplished very little to date. Nevertheless, a great deal of time, effort, and money has been spent in constructing facilities, procuring equipment, creating programs, and building a more responsive infrastructure. Perhaps more important, the CHSC has developed a functional information technology system. Knowledge is 56 power, and *56 that platform seems reasonably likely to contribute measurably to the long-term success of the

prison health care system. It provides a means of maintaining accurate records and thus creating accountability. See, e.g., Carol Gentry, Health-Care Firms Face Costly Change, Wall St. J., Jan. 3, 2000, at A3 ("By speeding up the transmission and improving the accuracy of information, health plans should be able to do a better job of monitoring the quality of care."); Laura Landro, Health Care Goes Digital: Doctors and Hospitals Find They Can't Stay Offline Any Longer, Wall St. J., June 10, 2002, at R6 ("There is a clear linkage now between technology and better patient outcomes."). The district court has cultivated this tree patiently and at great expense, and it would be rash for us to insist that it be uprooted just when it shows promise of bearing fruit.
The Secretary's related complaint 0907 that the ineffectiveness of privatization to date defeats the finding of narrowness 0907 is unpersuasive for two reasons. First, a determination of narrowness requires a court to decide whether ordered relief is tailored to rectify existing constitutional violations. See Cason v. Seckinger, 231 F.3d 777, 784 (11th Cir.2000) ("The court must make new findings about whether the relief currently complies with the need-narrowness-intrusiveness requirements, given the nature of the current violations."); see also Castillo v. Cameron County, 238 F.3d 339, 354 (5th Cir.2001). Whether a remedy is capable of successfully ameliorating constitutional violations has no necessary correlation with whether it is narrowly drawn. Narrow relief can be completely ineffectual. See Morales II, 13 F.Supp.2d at 157-58 (noting the failure of limited injunctive orders to bring the Puerto Rican correctional system into constitutional compliance). That the privatization concept has been slow to come to fruition does nothing to prove that the order is overly broad (or overly intrusive, for that matter).
Second, we think that the PLRA is too blunt an instrument for addressing this concern. As said, the PLRA limits courts to terminating prospective relief. Not every unforeseen difficulty in implementing injunctive decrees necessitates the total abandonment of a remedy. It is true that the CHSC has lagged far behind the original schedule and that the corporation has, to date, not accomplished its ultimate goals. It is also true that an ineffective remedy is a cause for concern. In light of the substantial progress that has been made, however, the mere fact that privatization is behind schedule does not convince us that it fails the narrowness-needintrusiveness test.[7]
We are well aware that federal oversight of Puerto Rico's correctional system cannot 0907 and should not 0907 last forever. We strongly urge both the district court and the litigants to move the privatization process forward with all practicable speed. For now, however, we conclude, based on the record evidence and the factual findings of the district court, that the privatization order meets the PLRA's requirements. The privatization solution has not yet been put into practice and common sense dictates that it be given a fair chance to work. The order appealed from provides that chance.
C. The Evidentiary Hearing.
The Secretary's fallback position is that the district court committed reversible error in its manner of conducting 57 the evidentiary hearing on the motion to terminate *57 prospective relief. This contention has four branches. All of
them are acarpous.
1. Burden of Proof. The Secretary first suggests that the district court impermissibly shifted the burden of proof. This suggestion derives primarily from the court's decision to order the proof by directing the Secretary (rather than the inmate class) to come forward, at the start of the hearing, with his evidence.
It is axiomatic that district courts enjoy wide latitude in matters concerning the ordering of proof and the presentation of evidence. See, e.g., United States v. Holmquist, 36 F.3d 154, 163 (1st Cir.1994); Elgabri v. Lekas, 964 F.2d 1255, 1260 (1st Cir.1992); see also Fed.R.Evid. 611(a). We review a trial court's determinations concerning the mode and order of proof for abuse of discretion. Nat'l R.R. Pass. Corp. v. Certain Temporary Easements, 357 F.3d 36, 42 (1st Cir.2004). We will reverse only if a determination has unfairly prejudiced the complaining party. Id.
The decision to require the Secretary to present his proof first was not an abuse of discretion. In arriving at its decision on the motion to terminate, the court was free to rely on any aspect of the record that tended to shed light on whether constitutional violations persisted. See Laaman v. Warden, N.H. State Prison, 238 F.3d 14, 17-18

(1st Cir.2001) (noting that the court's familiarity with the record and its receipt of periodic reports may afford it "comprehensive knowledge of whether a prison is, or is not, continuing to violate the consent decree"). At the beginning of the hearing, the court had before it a full evidentiary record, developed over many years, together with a cache of periodic reports as to progress under the consent decree. This plethoric evidence was sufficient, if unrebutted, to support a finding that constitutional violations endured. With this in mind, it was sensible for the court to invite the Secretary to offer evidence to the contrary.
To be sure, a trial court's authority to regulate the order of proof does not include the power to shift the burden of proof. Brown Daltas & Assocs., Inc. v. Gen. Accid. Ins. Co., 48 F.3d 30, 37 (1st Cir.1995) (reversing a judgment because the trial court erroneously shifted the burden of proof); see also 9 J. Wigmore, Evidence § 2489 (J. Chadbourn ed.1981). But that is not what happened here: the court's election to hear the Secretary's evidence first in no way betokened reallocation of the burden of proof. In its subsequent review of the evidence, the court said nothing that indicated any misunderstanding as to where the burden of proof rested. Rather, it supportably determined that the facts presented by the Secretary lacked sufficient probative force to blunt the thrust of the accumulated evidence of record. Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 339-40 (relying on the Secretary's own evidence to find continuing constitutional violations). In short, the contention that the lower court impermissibly shifted the burden of proof has no footing in the record.
2. The Agreement Between the Parties. The Secretary next maintains that the district court erred by relying on the existence of a "private agreement" (by private agreement, he means the stipulation that was signed in 1997 by, inter alios, his predecessor in office). Specifically, the Secretary asserts that the fact that there was an agreement between the parties should have had no bearing on the continuing viability of the subsequent order approving privatization (entered in 1998). This assertion overlooks that the so-called private agreement was 58 embodied in a stipulation presented to and adopted by the district court. Upon its adoption, the private *58 agreement became a judicially enforceable consent decree. Frew ex rel. Frew v. Hawkins, 540 U.S. 431, 124 S.Ct. 899, 903, 157 L.Ed.2d 855 (2004) ("A consent decree embodies an agreement of the parties and is also an agreement that the parties desire and expect will be reflected in, and be enforceable as, a judicial decree that is subject to the rules generally applicable to other judgments and decrees." (internal quotation marks omitted)); In re Pearson, 990 F.2d 653, 658 (1st Cir.1993) (similar).
This is significant because the Secretary's argument blurs the crucial distinction, for PLRA purposes, between private side agreements and consent decrees. The latter may serve as a vehicle for prospective relief under the PLRA; the former may not. See 18 U.S.C. § 3626(a); see also id. § 3626(c)(1).
In all events, the lower court did not rely impermissibly on the parties' original agreement. Although the court noted the existence of that agreement and scolded the Secretary for trying to renege on it, the holding in Morales IV was in no way premised either on an estoppel or on the fact that the parties previously had agreed to explore a privatization alternative. For these reasons, the Secretary's argument fails.
3. The Exclusion of Evidence. The Secretary also contends that the district court erred in refusing to allow him to introduce evidence as to the narrowness-need-intrusiveness criteria. On this point, as is so often true in litigation, context is decisive.
After the Secretary had presented his evidence as to the existence vel non of continuing constitutional violations, the district court asked him to summarize the evidence that he planned to adduce on the narrowness-needintrusiveness criteria. The Secretary proceeded to make an offer of proof. Having heard the proffer, the court determined that nothing in it bore directly upon the narrowness of, need for, or potential intrusiveness of the privatization remedy. Consequently, the court rejected the Secretary's offer of proof on relevancy grounds.
We descry no error. In many instances, relevancy boils down to a judgment call. See generally Fed.R.Evid. 401 (deeming evidence relevant if it has "any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence"). Accordingly, district courts enjoy wide latitude in determining the relevancy vel non of evidence. Laaman, 238 F.3d at 18-19; United States v. Tierney, 760 F.2d 382, 387 (1st Cir.1985). In this instance, the district court concluded that the offer of proof had no bearing on the appropriateness of the remedy under the PLRA's

narrowness-need-intrusiveness criteria. Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 337-38. Having reviewed the offer of proof, we find that this ruling was within the realm of the district court's discretion. We explain briefly.
By way of his offer of proof, the Secretary proposed to introduce evidence designed to show the ineffectiveness of the remedy. He began the proffer by alleging generally that the non-profit corporation was not a viable remedy because it had not yet treated a single patient. The district court asked for elaboration, and the Secretary expressed a desire to take discovery on the matter. Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 337. When the court refused that untimely request, the only details proffered by the Secretary tended to show that the CHSC was not complying with either the district court orders or Puerto Rico laws, and that it was not ready to begin treating 59 patients. Id. at 338. This is a distinct line *59 of inquiry. See Hadix v. Johnson, 228 F.3d 662, 673 (6th Cir.2000) (explaining that inquiries into compliance and inquiries into necessity under the PLRA are separate and distinct). As the district court sagely noted, compliance was not at issue in the evidentiary hearing. Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 338.
We 0907 like the district court 0907 do not see how the Secretary's offer of proof informs a determination of whether the privatization remedy is a narrowly tailored, relatively unintrusive response to the serious constitutional violations that the district court found still existed. We note, moreover, that the Secretary has not explained the connection. We thus cannot fault the district court either for the rejection of the offer of proof or for its consequent exclusion of the proffered evidence.
4. Rule 52(c). Finally, the Secretary assigns error to the district court's use of Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c) as an adjudicative tool. See Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 344. Rule 52(c) provides a court conducting a bench trial with a means for issuing a judgment on partial findings. The rule is designed for use when "a party has been fully heard on an issue and the court finds against the party on that issue." Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(c).
The district court invoked that procedure here. The Secretary asseverates that this was not permissible on the facts of this case. We reject this asseveration.
To be frank, we find the Secretary's argument difficult to fathom. The text of the rule is clear. When a party has finished presenting evidence and that evidence is deemed by the trier insufficient to sustain the party's position, the court need not waste time, but, rather, may call a halt to the proceedings and enter judgment accordingly. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 52 advisory committee note ("Subdivision (c) ... authorizes the court to enter judgment at any time that it can appropriately make a dispositive finding of fact on the evidence."); see also Atl. Track & Turnout Co. v. Perini Corp., 989 F.2d 541 (1st Cir.1993). The fact that the inmate class had the burden of proof did not place Rule 52(c) off limits. A judgment under Rule 52(c) can be entered for or against either a plaintiff or a defendant, regardless of the allocation of the burden of proof. See Bursztajn v. United States, 367 F.3d 485, 488 (5th Cir.2004); Fed. Refin. Co., 352 F.3d at 26; see also 9A Wright & Miller, supra § 2573.1.
Here, the Secretary had advanced his proof and the district court supportably concluded that the Secretary's evidence could not withstand the probative force of the historical record. In other words, even after taking the Secretary's case into account, the court determined that the plaintiffs had sustained their burden of showing pervasive and persistent constitutional violations. Morales IV, 300 F.Supp.2d at 340-42. The court also supportably determined that the privatization remedy satisfied the narrowness-need-intrusiveness criteria, and that the Secretary's offer of proof did not include any relevant evidence to the contrary. Based on these findings, the district court appropriately entered judgment pursuant to Rule 52(c). That the court made a series of credibility calls in reaching these conclusions in no way detracts from the legitimacy of its approach. See Wright & Miller, supra § 2573.1, at 497-99 (noting that the court's task under Rule 52(c) is to weigh the evidence, without drawing any special inferences in the nonmovant's favor, resolve any conflicts in the evidence, and "decide for itself where the preponderance lies").
IV. CONCLUSION
We are sensitive both to Congress's manifest desire to limit federal judicial oversight of state correctional systems 60 and to the length of time that Puerto *60 Rico's prisons have been under federal hegemony. These concerns
impel us to counsel the parties and the district court to move forward as swiftly as possible to cross the threshold

of constitutional adequacy so that federal judicial involvement may cease. For now, however, we accept the welldocumented judgment of the district court 0907 a court intimately acquainted with the details of this litigation and the intricacies of the Puerto Rican correctional system 0907 that inmate health care remains constitutionally unacceptable and that the privatization remedy holds promise for bringing inmate health care into compliance with constitutionally mandated standards.[8] Consequently, we reject the Secretary's current effort to vacate or terminate the existing consent decree.
We add a few words of caution. There are now significant financial reserves (in the form of accumulated fines) available for improvements in health care delivery, and the AOC seems willing to work for change. We urge the district court to move toward extricating itself from the toils of this litigation as soon as it can do so without defaulting on its responsibilities under the Constitution.
We need go no further. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the district court's denial of the Secretary's motion to vacate or terminate the pertinent portions of the existing consent decree. We take no view of the district court's procedural order, see supra Part II, as we lack jurisdiction to review that order on this interlocutory appeal.
Affirmed. Costs shall be taxed in favor of the plaintiffs.
[1] We note that a new administration, representing a different political party, took office following the general election held in November of 2000.
[2] The AOC has not appealed, and the district court's ukase has not been stayed. We are advised that meetings between the AOC and the plaintiffs are proceeding apace.
[3] With only isthmian exceptions, the courts of appeals are prohibited from exercising pendent appellate jurisdiction. See Swint v. Chambers County Comm'n, 514 U.S. 35, 49-51, 115 S.Ct. 1203, 131 L.Ed.2d 60 (1995); Limone v. Condon, 372 F.3d 39, 51-52 (1st Cir.2004). The Secretary offers no developed argumentation on this point and, as matters stand, we believe that this case is not a credible candidate for the exercise of pendent appellate jurisdiction.
[4] The Secretary makes a fifth argument: that the relief ordered by the district court requires Puerto Rican officials to act in contravention of local law. The district court refused to address this argument on the ground that the Secretary did not sufficiently specify the nature of the alleged violations. That ruling is supportable, and it precludes reliance on the argument here. See Teamsters Union v. Superline Transp. Co., 953 F.2d 17, 21 (1st Cir.1991) (holding that arguments not squarely raised in the trial court cannot be advanced on appeal). In all events, the Secretary's appellate presentation suffers from the same lack of specificity; he alleges the violations in the most general terms and does not inform us of where in the record we might find any evidence of them. This lack of developed appellate argumentation constitutes an independently sufficient basis for deeming the argument abandoned. See United States v. Zannino, 895 F.2d 1, 17 (1st Cir.1990) ("It is not enough merely to mention a possible argument in the most skeletal way, leaving the court to do counsel's work, create the ossature for the argument, and put flesh on its bones.").
[5] Although we assume arguendo the correctness of the Secretary's assessment of what transpired in 1998, we note that the district court made a series of contemporaneous written findings, which may well have satisfied the narrowness-need-intrusiveness requirements. See Morales II, 13 F.Supp.2d at 212 (holding that privatization "is necessary to protect the members of the plaintiff class from cruel and unusual punishment through constitutionally unacceptable health care services," that the remedy "extends no further than is necessary to correct the violation of the Federal rights of members of the plaintiff class," that "such relief is narrowly drawn," and that there "is no less intrusive means to correct the violation of plaintiffs' Federal rights").
[6] We reject out of hand the Secretary's argument that an order to privatize is a per se violation of the narrowness requirement of the PLRA. The narrowness of a remedy necessarily involves a close examination of a particular set of facts and a determination concerning what steps are reasonable to cure the ongoing constitutional violations. Because this will necessarily be influenced by a variety of factors, we are wary of adopting ironclad rules.

[7] It may well be that modification, or some other more limited adjustment, is appropriate to address such concerns, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(5) 0907 but that issue is not before us. [8] Should the circumstances change, or a substantial interval pass without significant progress, the Secretary is, of course, free to ask the lower court to reexamine these findings and reconsider the advisability of the ordered relief.
Save trees - read court opinions online on Google Scholar.

 
 Feliciano v. Barcelo, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1986)
1986 WL 21347 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
Carlos Morales FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Carlos Romero BARCELO, et al., Defendants.
Civ. No. 79–4(PG). | March 21, 1986.
Attorneys and Law Firms
Harvey B. Nachman, Harry Anduze, Santurce, P.R., Carlos García–Gutiérrez, Hato Rey, P.R., Rafael Pérez–Bachs, San Juan, P.R., José Fernández–Seín, Carlos E. Ramos, Santurce, P.R., Nora Rodríguez, Hato Rey, P.R., Ivonne Díaz de Carrera, Río Piedras, P.R., for plaintiffs.
Marcos Ramírez, Hato Rey, P.R., Department of Justice, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, San Juan, P.R., for defendants.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER INTERIM ATTORNEYS’ FEES
PEREZ–GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
*1 The Court has today entered an Order of Reference appointing two monitors in this action which will delay the entry of a final judgment in the case. The Court is seriously concerned that such delay will work to plaintiffs’ disadvantage in one respect which can be remedied before the final disposition of the case. Plaintiffs have been ably represented by counsel who have spent substantial amounts of time in the prosecution of their clients’ claims. The record eloquently speaks for the time consumed, the complexity of the issues litigated and the success of counsel’s endeavors. The plaintiffs have obtained a preliminary injunction which the defendants have not appealed. Some substantial, if temporary, relief has resulted in the delivery of health services, and that has only happened because of the success of plaintiffs. It is clear to the Court, and it appears from the Memorandum Opinion which has been entered that beyond even the relief and the results which have been obtained so far, plaintiffs have more than a substantial likelihood to prevail on a broad spectrum of issues. The longstanding and continuing violation of the

constitutional rights of the plaintiff class has been established beyond any doubt.
It is inequitable to delay at this point the award of attorneys’ fees to counsel for the plaintiff class. Defendants have been represented by law firms here and on the Mainland who have been and continue to be paid for their services. It is onerous to allow the plaintiffs’ attorneys to continue in their work without at least partial compensation.
Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 interim attorneys’ fees may be awarded to a party at any stage of the proceedings in the trial court’s discretion. There is no doubt that plaintiffs have already prevailed on the merits of their central claims. Hanrahan v. Hampton, 446 U.S. 754 (1980); Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 433 (1983), citing, Nadeau v. Helgemoe, 581 F.2d 275, 278–9 (1st Cir.1978); Frazier v. Board of Trustees, 765 F.2d 1278, 1292–5 (5th Cir.1985).
The Court must exercise its discretion and consider that the time to enter an interim award of attorneys’ fees is now.
Counsel for all the parties are reminded that a reasonable settlement of this matter is one thing that the courts can expect able lawyers to deal with. White v. New Hampshire Dept. of Empl. Sec., 455 U.S. 445, 453 (1982); Henley, 461 U.S. at 437.
Without in any way judging any issue about the rate of compensation or the time for which plaintiffs’ attorneys have a right to be compensated, the Court is nevertheless, on this record, prepared to intimate that substantial amounts of time have been and will be spent in the litigation of difficult issues by able counsel of recognized standing in and beyond the Puerto Rican legal community.
It is therefore ORDERED that all the parties shall brief within the next fifteen (15) days after entry of this Order the issue of an award of interim attorneys’ fees for plaintiffs’ attorneys.
*2 It is FURTHER ORDERED that, if no reasonable agreement is reached by the parties, attorneys for the plaintiffs shall move the Court for interim attorneys’ fees at any time after thirty (30) days from the entry of this Order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
	  
1

Feliciano v. Barcelo, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1986) 2

 
 Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

1990 WL 83321 Only the Westlaw citation is currently available.
United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico.
Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al., Plaintiffs, v.
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, et al., Defendants.
CIV. No. 79-4 (PG). | June 7, 1990.
Attorneys and Law Firms
Harvey B. Nachman, Harry Anduze, Santurce, P. R., Carlos Garcia-Gutierrez, Hato Rey, P. R., Rafael Perez-Bachs, San Juan, P. R., Jose Fernandez-Sein, Carlos E. Ramos, Santurce, P. R., Nora Rodriguez, Pia Gallegos, Hato Rey, P. R., for plaintiffs.
Marcos Ramirez, Hato Rey, P. R., Department of Justice, Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, San Juan, P. R., Jose A. Fernandez Paoli, Santurce, P.R., Gonzalez Badillo & Davila, Hato Rey, P. R., for defendants.
Opinion
OPINION AND ORDER
PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Chief Judge.
*1 On September 8, 1986, the parties entered into a stipulation requiring defendants to provide each prisoner within the jurisdiction of the Administration of Corrections (AOC) at least 55 square feet of living and sleeping space no later than December 31, 1987.1 That stipulation was provisionally approved by the court on September 26, 1986, and was finally approved, following notice to the class pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.Pro. Rule 23 and a hearing, on January 26, 1987. In response to defendants’ October 1, 1987 motion for partial and temporary relief from the stipulation and order, the court granted an extension until January 1, 1989. On December 23, 1988, nine days before the deadline for compliance, defendants filed a second motion for partial and temporary relief regarding the 55 square foot standard. This constituted defendants’ third effort to modify the order approving the parties’ September 1986 stipulation. This motion, which is the subject of this opinion and order, requested that the 35 square foot standard remain in effect at La Pica, Limon, Punta Lima, Sabana Hoyos, Guavate, and Zarzal prison camps “at least for an additional year and a half.” Subsequently, defendants filed a series of supplements to their motion. The Amended Fourth Supplement, filed on November 27, 1989, added Vega Alta and Fajardo, two

institutions housing female prisoners, to the list of facilities for which delay was sought.
Hearings were held on May 3, 4, 7, and 8, 1990.2 Testimonial evidence was adduced from Lorenzo Villalba Colon, the Chairman of the Parole Board of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico, Manuel Romero, a deputy monitor appointed by this court, Jose Jimenez-Quinones, the Executive Director of the Expedited Bail Project, Nancy Boneta, Director of Penal Institutions for the AOC, Charles Montgomery, the Director of Institutional Operations of the AOC, Dr. Raul Villalobos, Director of the Correctional Health Program of the Department of Health, and Steve J. Martin, plaintiffs’ correctional expert.3 The court also received documentary evidence offered by the parties.
*2 The question of the precise relief defendants are seeking was clarified during the course of the hearings.
Q. [by the court] You are only requesting that that [delay in achieving 55 square feet] be done as to the 6 penal camps and the two women’s institutions?
A. [Mr. Del Valle] Yes you Honor and we stated that to the Court.
Q. So I understand then that the 5th supplement should be read in light of the statement you just made?
A. Yes your Honor.
Q. Are we talking about La Pica, Limon, Sabana Hoyos, Punta Lima, Guavate and Zarzal, Fajardo and Vega Alta?
Q. [by Mr. Del Valle] Is that the position of the Corrections Administration Doctora Otero?
A. [by Dra. Otero]
The temporal limits of the modification sought by defendants with respect to these eight institutions also require clarification. Originally, as has been noted, defendants requested a delay in the implementation of the 55 square foot standard for at least 18 months.4 Subsequently, in a fourth supplement filed on November 27, 1989, defendants requested that dormitories at the six camps be allowed to remain at the 35 square foot standard until July 1, 1990, and that the dormitories at the two institutions for female prisoners, Vega Alta and Fajardo, be allowed to remain at the 35 square foot standard “until the new women’s facility at Ponce is completed.” Finally, in their Fifth Supplement filed on March 26, 1990, in which defendants rested their request for modification and a continuance of the May 3 hearing on a comprehensive compliance plan to be developed by Mr. Charles
1

Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

Montgomery, the Director of Institutional Operations for the Administration of Corrections, and to be filed by defendants in July 1990, defendants requested that
the hearing scheduled for May 3 be continued and enforcement of the 55 square foot standard be postponed at least until the parties and the Court have had the opportunity to consider the comprehensive plan to be filed in July of 1990. Fifth Supplement, p. 19. Thus, the Court can only surmise that defendants’ present position is that the 55 square foot requirement not be imposed at six camps and at the two closed institutions for female prisoners until some date, not yet known, that will be revealed in the comprehensive compliance plan defendants intend to file in July 1990. This statement of the issue before the court, standing alone, is sufficient to suggest the outcome of this proceeding.
In their initial motion, defendants requested modification based on (1) their expectation that 80% of the penal population would be able to be housed at the 55 square foot standard by January 1, 1989; (2) the practical impossibility of making use of all beds in the system due to security constraints; (3) defendants’ willingness to “redouble efforts” under certain programs (e.g., executive clemency, opening of additional halfway houses) pursuant to the court’s April 28, 1988 order granting a delay until January 1, 1989 to meet the 55 square foot standard; and (4) the conditions at the penal camps that would be affected by the modification. In the text of various supplements to their initial motion, however, defendants asserted a variety of shifting bases for their request for modification. These include delays in opening Bayamon 1072 and attendant delays in transfers of prisoners to that facility [Supplement of December 30, 1988], further delays in completion of the Bayamon facility resulting from construction worker absenteeism, heavy rainfall, and other factors, “last minute” water pressure problems at Limon, and delayed transfers to Vega Alta because of delay in the delivery of concrete mix, construction worker absenteeism, and other factors [Second Supplement filed January 5, 1989], additional delays in the occupancy of new spaces at Bayamon and Vega Alta resulting from heavy rainfall [Third Supplement, filed January 17, 1989], and various reasons “beyond defendants’ control” that prevented the achievement of compliance with the 55 square foot standard at all closed institutions [[[Fourth Supplement, filed November 27, 1989].
*3 As has been noted, it was in their fourth supplement that defendants, for the first time, requested modification in connection with Vega Alta and Fajardo. In adding these facilities to their request for relief, defendants simply informed the court that
(t)he 55 sq. ft. standard may not be

achieved in Vega Alta and Fajardo, until the 200 bed facility for women is completed in the Institucion Regional del Sur in December of 1990. It should be considered that most of the Vega Alta spaces regularly provide 55 sq. ft. Thus most of the Vega Alta population would continue to be provided 55 sq. ft. Also, the Fajardo institution - recently being used for women - is a small institution almost exclusively housing pretrial detainees. These are detained for relatively short periods of time - not exceeding 6 months. The conditions of confinement at Fajardo compare favorable [sic] with those of other closed institutions.
In their November 27, 1989 pleading, defendants also informed the court of various legislative and executive measures taken to reduce the penal population and described increases in budget enjoyed by the AOC since fiscal year 77-78. Data regarding the number of prisoners housed in facilities providing 55 square feet of sleeping and living space also are set forth in this supplement.
It was not until their fifth supplement, filed on March 26, 1990, that defendants broached their theory that an “accumulation of changes that have taken place in the system since the Stipulation was signed” had caused defendants to undertake the development of a comprehensive compliance plan to deal with all elements of the litigation. In this pleading, defendants described Mr. Montgomery’s diligent efforts to develop this plan, the fact of full compliance with the 35 square foot standard, the reduction and stabilization of the AOC’s population, and various alleged improvements made throughout the system. Defendants also informed the court for the first time that the AOC had reached a state of “gridlock” resulting apparently from ““defendants’ obligations in this case, Commonwealth law and/or AOC policy.” Defendants also reminded the court of defendants’ obligations in areas other than crowding and provided the court with a list of goals established by the AOC’s Operations Division. Finally, the court was informed that
Mr. Montgomery is convinced that in order to make substantial progress in meeting the obligations of the case it is necessary to develop a comprehensive plan that integrates all of defendants’ obligations in light of obstacles to
2

Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

implementation and to move forward systematically.
Defendants concluded their final supplement by arguing the “standard for modification” and by requesting a delay in hearings scheduled on March 19, 1990 to commence on May 3. Thus, seven days after the hearing was set, defendants announced a new theory to support their motion for partial and temporary relief, filed on December 23, 1988. It was upon this theory that defendants reluctantly, but finally, went to trial on May 3, 1990.
*4 Defendants’ argue that their decision to develop a comprehensive compliance plan, of unknown content or effect and to be filed sometime in July, supports modification under the “flexible standard” of modification relied on by several courts in recent cases. The court disagrees. Accordingly, based on its review of the evidence it heard during the May hearings and its review of the law, the court will deny defendants’ motion for partial and temporary relief.
As of April 15, 1990, prisoners were being housed in violation of the 55 square foot standard at Stop 8, Fajardo, Sabana Hoyos, Zarzal, Guavate, Punta Lima, Limon, and La Pica. The population at these facilities ranged from 118% to 162% of the permitted capacity. [Agreed Statement of Fact #3].
As of April 26, 1990, 577 prisoners were assigned in excess of institutional capacities established pursuant to the 55 square foot standard. This number represented 6% of the total population of the Administration of Corrections [[[Defendants’ Exhibit C]5 It is obvious, however, that all prisoners in an overcrowded institution suffer harm. Thus, it is relevant that as of April 26, 1990, the total number of prisoners housed in facilities providing fewer than 55 square feet of living and sleeping space to some or all prisoners in those institutions was 1,948, or 20.7% of the total penal population [[Defendants’ Exhibit C].
At the time the September 1986 stipulation was entered into, the penal population in Puerto Rico was increasing by 18% per year, and that rate of growth is said to continue at this time. Dra. Otero testified as follows: “when we worked on the stipulation we get the projection of 18 [percent] and that’s what we have up to now” [Tr. 144]. According to Dra. Otero, those projections were made very carefully and have been very good projections up to date [Tr. 144].6
*5 Conditions in the penal camps are appallingly dreadful. Mr. Montgomery, the AOC’s Director of Institutional Operations, testified that crowding at the penal camps was exacerbated by a “gross lack of staff

supervision and guidance.” [Tr. 59] In general, he found uncontrolled accumulation of inmate property that reduced living space considerably [Tr. 59], inadequate sanitation [Tr. 59], and improper facility maintenance [Tr. 60]. According to Mr. Montgomery, inmates at the camps he visited are not even enjoying 35 square feet of living and sleeping space, as corridors and activity space are being included in the measurement.7 He found inadequate numbers of showers and toilets at Punta Lima [Tr. 61]. At Zarzal, he observed garbage overflowing in the center of the compound [Tr. 62], only 50 chairs in a dining room that serves a population of 499 [Tr. 62], and unsatisfactory kitchen arrangements. [[[Tr. 63]. He also testified to inoperable plumbing, the impossibility of obtaining a verified count of prisoners, and the presence of “privileged” housing countenanced by security officers for favored prisoners [Tr. 64-65].
Mr. Montgomery found the sewer plant at La Pica to be inoperative [Tr. 65]. He described conditions at Guavate as “horrible,” by which he meant “filthy, overcrowded and excess property” [Tr. 67]. He described Guavate as “the worst facility that I saw in the tour, although Zarzal is nothing to brag about” [Tr. 67]. He also testified to understaffing at that institution [Tr. 68] and to the presence of a large number of fighting cocks and a gaming arena observed by Dra. Otero on at least one prior occasion [Tr. 68-70].8 According to Mr. Montgomery, apart from this form of entertainment, there are no organized recreational programs at Guavate [Tr. 71].
Camp Limon is characterized by “excessive personal property and almost total lack of staff supervision [Tr. 72]. Mr. Montgomery agreed that “you found the kitchen that smelled, you found that the kitchen stove should be replaced, you found that there was preferred housing” [Tr. 73].
Given this testimony by the AOC official to whom Dra. Otero has delegated plenary responsibility for institutional operations, which testimony was fully corroborated by that of plaintiffs’ expert, Mr. Steve Martin, the court is outraged by defendants’ assertion that conditions in the penal camps justify modification. Moreover, the fact that as many as 20% of the penal population are provided with less than 55 square feet of living and sleeping space hardly constitutes a basis for modification. No other factual justification cited in the original motion for partial and temporary relief, or in the first four supplements to that pleading, merits consideration by the court.9 Defendants’ final justification, set forth in their fifth supplement, amounts to nothing more than the announcement of a new operational policy and, for reasons explained below, provides no legal basis for modification of the existing order.
*6 No standard of review, “flexible” or otherwise, supports modification on the factual record before the
3

Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

court.10 Defendants’ reliance on New York State Association for Retarded Children v. Carey, 706 F.2d 956 (2d. Cir. 1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 915 (1983), is altogether misplaced. The gist of the reasoning of the court of appeals in that case was that the modification sought by defendants would, according to the testimony of experts, best serve the Willowbrook class. These experts testified that implementation of the order as written would effectively deny members of the plaintiff class the proper medical supervision they require. One expert went so far as to describe implementation of the original decree as amounting to “malpractice.”
In describing the case before it, the court of appeals stated,
But it is not, as in Swift, in derogation of the primary objective of the decree, namely to empty such a mammoth institution as Willowbrook; indeed defendants offered substantial evidence that, again in contrast to Swift, the modification was essential to attaining that goal at any reasonably early date.
706 F.2d at 969. This court has heard no evidence, even crediting fully the evidence that was proffered by defendants after it was excluded for irrelevancy, that suggests that the modification sought by defendants would be anything other than in derogation of the primary objective of the court’s order adopting the September 8, 1986 stipulation: the reduction of an unconstitutional level of population density, which is an essential precondition to the achievement of all other reforms required throughout the AOC. To suggest that the modification would in any manner be “essential to attaining that goal at any reasonably early date” simply is ludicrous.
Much more relevant to the decision in this case is the opinion of the court of appeals in Ruiz v. Lynaugh, 811 F.2d 856 (5th Cir. 1987). In affirming the district court’s denial of modification of a “crowding stipulation,” the court found that the request for modification failed under either the “stricter standards” of United States v. Swift & Co., 286 U.S. 106 (1932), or under the “flexible approach to modification.”11 With respect to the former, the Texas Department of Corrections failed to establish any unforeseen factual change necessary for modification; regarding the latter, the court of appeals noted that “the modification sought by TDC would abrogate the primary objective of the decree, i.e., to reduce overcrowding in TDC through use of facilities meeting agreed-upon standards.” 811 F.2d at 862.

*7 Here, as in Ruiz, defendants’ motion for partial and temporary relief must fail under any test. As has been noted, there has been no unforeseen population increase or any other unforeseen fact that would justify modification under the standard announced in Swift. Moreover, and without question, the modification sought by defendants will abrogate the primary objective of the stipulation and order designed to eliminate unconstitutional conditions of crowding throughout Puerto Rico’s correctional institutions.12
An analogous line of cases relates to defendants’ argument that a change in policy, i.e., the decision to develop a comprehensive compliance plan, justifies modification. These cases address the effect of change of conduct on the part of defendants on the eve of a hearing in which plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief. Unless a court is satisfied that the change of conduct will vindicate the rights asserted by plaintiffs and that there is no reasonable expectation of future injurious conduct, defendants’ action does not render moot the issue before the court and thus will not prevent the issuance of prospective injunctive relief. See generally, Wright & Miller, Vol. 11, Sec. 2942 (1973), United States v. W.T. Grant Co., 345 U.S. 629, 632-33 (1953), United States v. Oregon State Medical Society, 343 U.S. 326 (1952), Atlantic Richfield Co. v. Oil Chemical & Atomic Workers Int’l. Union, 447 F.2d 945, 947 (7th Cir. 1971). Here defendants offer even less than a change of practice in advance of the issuance of injunctive relief; they simply assert that their long overdue decision to attempt to develop a rational, comprehensive plan to achieve constitutional conditions in Puerto Rico’s correctional institutions suffices to justify suspension of the prospective application of a stipulation and order, consented to by the parties, that goes to the heart of plaintiffs’ constitutional entitlement.13 Moreover, defendants offer virtually nothing by way of assurance that the change of policy, i.e., the development and implementation of a comprehensive plan, will ever materialize into a permanent change of practice guaranteed to eliminate unconstitutional conditions throughout the AOC:
*8 Q. [by Mr. Nachman] Now, do you have a commitment from the administration that if you submit a plan, that they will go along with it?
A. [by Mr. Montgomery] I have every reason to believe that Doctor Otero is going to get me that.
Q. Has she told you so, in so many words?
A. I am not going to ask Doctor Otero, are you going to give me permission to do the plan, I think in fairness to her, she has to see the plan too.

4

Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

Q. Is it necessary for --- I mean let’s assume that she does make that commitment?
A. Yes Sir.
Q. And is it necessary to also get the people higher up in the government involved, so that this can be accomplished? . . .
A. Yes I would say from my experience and everything, from the organizational chart, it does not stop with her, she would have already signed the organizational chart, somebody else obviously has to do it.
Q. Does that include getting the Governor involved in this whole project?
A. Yes Sir, and I believe that the stimulus that you can provide, that’s where I see the Court coming in.
Tr. 101-102. Dra. Otero also addressed this question in her testimony:
Q. Do you endorse the plan the comprehensive plan that is being prepared by Mr. Montgomery?
A. I have been working with Mr. Chuck Montgomery on ideas, the plan is not something that he invented, the plan is the final decision between he and me, and between recommendations from experts and between conversations with monitors and with conversations with deputy monitors and with visiting and experience, and these 5 years experience is a lot, so that plan is to take all the parts and put it together, from that, I get the ideas and I get my worries, and he is the one who is putting everything together, once he puts that plan together then I have to react to that plan, I don’t know if everything he is going to put there I will accept, but I will be willing to review it and I know because we are working together on this that most of the things that he is going to put there is because I agree on that, so I don’t know why I cannot accept his plan and just support him, not only as Administrator of Corrections, but the next step will be take him to the Task Force of Corrections that is the organization that the Governor relies on for discussing previously that this has to go to the Governor, Mr. Chuck Montgomery has been in that Task Force before has talked about this on how he can do these things, he accepted the plan, he, in the meeting the president of the Task Force, the Secretary of Justice, told him he can [meet] with anybody he can, in order to see if that can be done, and from that he can get the support, I am planning to get the Task Force meet again, once he get the plan and discuss it in that Task Force, and if I am not pleased with the decisions made at the Task Force, he and me are going to get the Governor in this, because the problem is that the Governor is in this already, because we met in the

Security Council most of the time and the Task Force’s decisions and discussions are given to the Governor, so the Governor know about it, and he is giving all support we need to finish with this problems and if it was not for his support, I will not practically comply with many things that we have already (emphasis added).
*9 Tr. 123-24. Whatever may be derived from Dra. Otero’s testimony, it surely does not amount to unequivocal assurance that an adequate, comprehensive plan will be submitted or that the resources and full support from all agencies of government that will be needed for implementation in fact will be made available. The court and the plaintiff class are being offered nothing more than a hope and a half-promise that at last, more than 10 years following the commencement of this litigation, the AOC will attempt to obtain endorsement and support of a comprehensive plan to address the multitude of problems confronting the agency.
In summary, modification will be denied. Upon careful consideration, however, the court has determined that it will not resume the scheduled hearings at this time to determine whether defendants should be held in contempt of the court’s order approving the September 1986 stipulation. Having addressed this issue on two earlier occasions, the court entertains doubt, abundantly sustained by the record in this case, that defendants would be able to present a cognizable defense to contempt charges or to avoid coercive or remedial sanctions.14 This having been said, however, the court will provide the defendants in this action with one final opportunity to prove their willingness and ability to comply with existing orders and to correct constitutional deficiencies throughout the AOC. This opportunity will be provided by permitting defendants to file their “comprehensive compliance plan” within 30 days of the entry of this order.
As this opinion and order suggests, the court has reached this conclusion with hesitance and foreboding. Lest there be any misunderstanding on the part of defendants, the court will outline carefully the expectations it attaches to its act of grace toward defendants.
The plan is expected to remedy the condition described by Mr. Montgomery in the following exchange:
Q. [by the court] Sir, according to exhibit 2 and what I gather from it, and your comments on it, is that what the situation boils down [to] is that the prisons are being run by the prisoners and not the staff?
A. [by Mr. Montgomery] That is just about it in a nut shell.
[Tr. 97]. Moreover, Mr. Montgomery testified that the
5

Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

plan would be based ““totally” on American Correctional Association Standards [Tr. 61], and the court does not expect to be disappointed with respect to this representation. It is the court’s expectation that the plan will address all outstanding orders in this cause, including Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 497 F.Supp. 14 (D.Puerto Rico 1980), and all issues identified in the memorandum opinion written by the court in March of 1986. Morales Feliciano v. Romero Barcelo, 672 F.Supp. 591 (D.Puerto Rico 1986). In particular, the court expects the plan to provide for compliance with the 55 square foot standard at the earliest possible date. Mr. Montgomery testified that compliance with this requirement could be achieved in 18 months. This goal, he testified, will require construction, the possible release of inmates, and substantial expansion of halfway house facilities (Tr. 90-93). Without in any way suggesting that 18 months is an acceptable delay, the court assumes that it will not be affronted by a timetable that contradicts Mr. Montgomery’s testimony. In fact, the court expects the plan to provide for significantly lower population densities in the camps and institutions for females by the end of 1990.
*10 When the plan is filed, the court will provide the parties with a reasonable period of time to attempt to reach agreement on the terms of a comprehensive compliance plan that will redirect the course of this litigation and ultimately bring about vindication of the constitutional rights of members of the plaintiff class in the shortest possible time. Failing agreement on such a plan, hearings will commence on October 1, 1990. In the absence of a legally cognizable defense to contempt, the court will act.15 The court has considered, but not yet concluded, what remedies might be imposed at that time. Defendants are hereby put on notice, however, that compensatory fines for the benefit of members of the plaintiff class, coercive fines at a level calculated to bring about speedy compliance with the 55 square foot standard, and the accelerated award of good time to prisoners to reduce population density are among the remedies the court will be prepared to impose and enforce.
Quite beyond the issue of crowding, all parties and counsel understand the nature of conditions throughout the AOC. These abominable conditions, resulting largely from maladministration, are reflected in numerous reports submitted by the Court Monitor and confirmed by this court.16 Thus, the court also will consider, finally and reluctantly, whether anything short of the imposition of a receivership will bring about compliance with minimal constitutional standards in the jails and prisons of the Commonwealth. If this drastic remedy is shown to be required, the court will not hesitate to impose it.

*11 In conclusion, the court recalls Mr. Montgomery’s testimony that
. . . I see us agreeing somehow, coming to some sort of agreement, that yes, this is the way that we are going to proceed, then I see the gun being at the Administration of Corrections’ head (emphasis added).
The court has every hope that defendants will produce a workable and comprehensive plan that enjoys the full support of the Administrator of Corrections, the Secretary of Justice, who serves as the chairman of the Commonwealth’s Corrections Task Force, the Governor of Puerto Rico, and plaintiffs’ counsel. Mr. Montgomery’s vision of judicial violence notwithstanding, it is neither the function nor the intention of this court to hold a gun to the head of any of the defendants in this litigation; it should be equally clear, however, that this court of equity will not suffer a wrong of such constitutional magnitude as is being imposed on prisoners throughout Puerto Rico to go any longer without an adequate remedy.
Wherefore, it is hereby
ORDERED that defendants’ Motion for Partial and Temporary Relief of the September 8, 1986 Stipulation Regarding the 55 Sq. Ft. Standard should be, and hereby is, DENIED. It is further
ORDERED that, within 30 days of the entry of this order, defendants shall file a comprehensive compliance plan in accordance with the terms of their own representations to the court and in keeping with the requirements of this order. It is further
ORDERED that the parties shall enter into good faith negotiations regarding the adequacy of the plan filed by defendants and, with the assistance of the Court Monitor, attempt to reach agreement on the terms of the plan. It is further
ORDERED that, in the absence of an agreed-upon plan, hearings shall commence on October 1, 1990 to determine the nature of any supplemental relief, coercive or otherwise, that may be required.
SO ORDERED this 7th day of June 1990, in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
	  

Footnotes 6

Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

1

The stipulation also required that 35 square feet of living and sleeping space be afforded to all prisoners by December 31, 1986.

Defendants’ motion to modify the 35 square foot requirement was denied on September 14, 1987. Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez

Colon, 672 F.Supp. 627 (D.Puerto Rico 1987). Noncompliance with this provision of the stipulation resulted in a finding of

contempt and the imposition of heavy fines. Order, July 23, 1987 and Order, August 15, 1988. The latter order was affirmed,

Morales Feliciano v. Parole Bd. of Com. of P.R., 887 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1989), cert. denied 58 U.S.L.W. 3597 (1990), and, to date,

defendants have paid more than $30,000,000 in fines pursuant to these orders. Only the 55 square foot standard is before the court

at this time.

2

The hearings were convened to consider not only defendants’ motion to modify, but also to consider plaintiffs’ June 9, 1989

motion for the willful disobedience of court orders entered on stipulations of the parties (contempt motion). On March 19, 1990,

the court entered an order setting a hearing on both the modification and the contempt motions for May 3, 1990. In that order, the

court indicated that it would first hear evidence from the parties on the modification motion and would proceed on the contempt

motion only if it reached a decision to deny modification. On May 8, the hearing was adjourned after the court heard evidence on

the modification motion, and this opinion and order is being entered on the basis of that evidence.

3

Testimony of eight AOC superintendents was excluded on plaintiffs’ objection for lack of relevancy. Defendants made a proffer of

the testimony they claim would have been adduced had the objection not been sustained, and plaintiffs made a proffer of facts they

claim would have been elicited on cross-examination of those witnesses.

The court wishes to express its special appreciation to Mr. Montgomery and Mr. Villalba for their conscientious and candid

testimony. Both of these witnesses are functionaries of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico. Nonetheless, they expressed without

reservation the obstacles they confront in their day-to-day efforts to achieve compliance with the court’s orders in this litigation,

and their dedication to constructive change is apparent. The court also wishes to express its appreciation to Mr. Martin, whose

observations regarding the role of the court in institutional reform litigation were particularly helpful and well received.

4

Since defendants’ original motion was filed on December 23, 1988, May 23, 1990 marked the 18th month following the motion for

temporary and partial relief.

5

In determining the substantiality of defendants’ compliance with the 35 square foot standard in this case, the court of appeals found

that “the number of prisoners suffering that harm (7 to 10% of the prison population) is large . . . (emphasis added). Morales

Feliciano v. Parole Bd. of Com. of P.R., 887 F.2d at 5. In the same opinion, however, the court found that this percentage range

was sufficiently “modest” to overcome any alleged defense of impossibility. Id.

6

Defendants introduced no other evidence in support of Dra. Otero’s testimony, and the court has no knowledge of the basis for this

projection. It is noteworthy, however, that the increase in population between January 3, 1989 and January 31, 1990 was only 8.5%

[Fifth Supplement, p. 5]. This reduced rate of growth was attributable to legislation increasing awards of bonificacion (good time)

and revising criteria for the setting of bail in cases involving misdemeanor charges. Therefore, although the court is not confident

of the accuracy of Dra. Otero’s testimony that the 18% growth rate continues at this time, it appears that the defendants have been

planning on the basis of that annual growth rate at least since September 1986, when the stipulation was executed. Thus, they

cannot argue credibly that unanticipated growth in population provides a basis for modification.

7

This method of measurement is permitted by the parties’ September 8, 1986 stipulation. Mr. Montgomery’s testimony only

underscores the fact that a minimal constitutional standard was applied by the parties and the court in addressing the problem of

extreme overcrowding of Puerto Rico’s correctional institutions.

8

On that occasion, Dra. Otero gave instructions that the fighting cocks were to be removed. Her orders, however, had been ignored

as of April 21, 1990, the date of Mr. Montgomery’s visit to Guavate [Tr. 69, Plaintiff’s Exhibit 2].

9

Although defendants put on no direct evidence in support of their argument regarding the practical impossibility of making use of

all beds in the system due to security constraints, Mr. Montgomery’s testimony implicitly supported the obvious conclusion that

some number of beds must remain empty at any time to permit proper classification procedures to be implemented. This truism,

however, comes as no surprise to Dra. Otero, who testified to her knowledge of classification principles [Tr. 119] and to her

general correctional expertise [Tr. 154], and cannot serve as a basis for modification of the court’s order.

10

The court incorporates herein the reasoning set forth in its earlier order denying modification of the order approving the September

1986 stipulation. Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, 672 F.Supp. 627 (D.Puerto Rico 1987).

11

The facts in Ruiz are highly apposite to those before this court. In the Texas litigation, defendants were attempting to avoid

compliance with a provision of a stipulation that was designed to ameliorate unconstitutional crowding throughout the system. The

provision in question related to construction standards applicable to new penal facilities.

12

Other cases relied on by defendants in their post-trial brief are easily distinguishable and offer no support for modification on the

record before this court. Kozlowski v. Coughlin, 871 F.2d 241 (2d Cir. 1989), Keith v. Volpe, 784 F.2d 1457 (9th Cir. 1986),

7

Morales Feliciano v. Hernandez Colon, Not Reported in F.Supp. (1990)

Duran v. Elrod, 760 F.2d 756 (7th Cir. 1985), Donovan v. Robbins, 752 F.2d 1170 (7th Cir. 1985), Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir. 1984),Smith v. Fairman, 690 F.2d 122 (7th Cir. 1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 964 (1983), Nelson v. Collins, 659 F.2d 420 (4th Cir. 1981).

13

Particularly relevant to the case at hand is the Supreme Court’s admonition “to beware of efforts to defeat injunctive relief by

protestations of repentance and reform, especially when abandonment seems timed to anticipate suit, and there is probability of

resumption.” United States v. Oregon State Medical Society, 343 U.S. at 333.

14

Defendants have admitted noncompliance with the court’s order. Thus, the only question remaining would be the existence of a

valid defense.

15

Of course, even in the absence of agreement, a plan that the court found satisfactory to bring about timely compliance with its

orders and with the mandates of the United States Constitution, and to implement the purposes of its orders, could be a basis for

modification of existing orders, if the plan contains sufficient guarantees of timely and complete execution. In this connection,

however, the court announces that its patience with repetitive efforts to modify a recent stipulation has reached its end. Defendants

should ponder the implications of the following observation by the court of appeals in Newman v. Graddick, 740 F.2d 1513, 1521

(11th Cir.1984):

The contention could be made that this decision would simply mean that the defendants could continually delay enforcement

of a remedy for unconstitutionality by seeking modification every time enforcement is sought. This should not be a necessary

result. The good faith of the defendants and the substantiality of the alleged improvements would always be a consideration

before a hearing on modification would be required.

Id. at 1521.

16

The court is truly saddened by Mr. Montgomery’s testimony that his first priority for reform of the system is the fundamental

organization of the AOC:

Until we can get a handle on the organization from top to bottom with clear lines of delegated authority all the way down, so

everybody knows who answers to who and who, and who jumps when someone speaks . . .

Surely, this much - if nothing more - could have been accomplished since 1980.

	  

8

 
 Rullan v. Feliciano, 543 U.S. 1054 (2005) 125 S.Ct. 910
Supreme Court of the United States John A. RULLAN, Secretary, Puerto Rico Department of Health, et al., petitioners,
v. Carlos Morales FELICIANO, et al.
No. 04-630. | Jan. 10, 2005. Case below, 378 F.3d 42. Opinion Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied. Parallel Citations 125 S.Ct. 910 (Mem), 160 L.Ed.2d 776, 73 USLW 3299, 73 USLW 3394, 73 USLW 3397
1

 
 Hernandez Colon v. Morales Feliciano, 494 U.S. 1046 (1990)

110 S.Ct. 1511 Supreme Court of the United States
Rafael HERNANDEZ COLON, Individually and as Governor of Puerto Rico, et al., petitioners, v. Carlos MORALES FELICIANO, et al
No. 89-1016 | March 19, 1990
Case below, 697 F.Supp. 37; Morales-Feliciano v. Parole Board of Com. of P.R., 887 F.2d 1.

Opinion
The motion of respondents Pedro Rivera Ortiz, et al. for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit denied.
Parallel Citations 110 S.Ct. 1511 (Mem), 108 L.Ed.2d 646
	  

1