0 l JGE JOHN W DARRAH

'-

UNITED STATESOISTRICTCOURflIAGfSTRATE JUDGe Lb vL

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

L\I

-'
In the Matter of

4U1GJ0;0~lfJia/Mif.rIo,,,."!/(1J

If~ C;) f'l

u.s. Equal Elnployment Opportuni1$} ~ission, V,....: V

Plaintiff,

'vue Case Number:

v.

American Airlines, Inc.,

c

APPEA~NCES ARE f:n:;W.rBVfuDBYTHE UNDERSIGNED AS ATTORNEY(S) FOR:

U,
o

u.s. Equal Elnployment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff

u~( "

-'j ..

:::::.r·'i

.

~/;/,

CJ:";.;·

,

, "'-r

n w

.._.!h. '.1-;-0',
~,

~

{,J,dJd SIGNA;:(L {J

I~_
I"

"-

J (J'r--..

~illljl/:;/

NAME
,~. W",lr'lron

/

C~ickson

FIRM
Equal

Elnployment

Opportunity

Cannissi~n

I~ ~l ~loyment Opportunity Cannission

STREET ADDRESS
500 W. Madison St. Suite 2800
CITY!STATfiZIP
Chicago,. Illinois 60661

STRE ADDRESS
50~ W. Madison St., Suite 2800 ~TAlTcEaJgZIoP, Illinois 60661

TELEPHONE NUMBER

(312) 353-7525

"

IDtNTIFICAIION NUMBER (SE!, !IEM. ON ,",vEHSE)
ARDC No. 02920646

MEMBER OF TRIAL IWl?

0 YES

"- IJ:'LEPHONE NUMBER (312) 353-8551 IDENTltlCAliON NUMBER (SEE II EM • ON REVERSE)

0 NO

AROC No, 01187589
MEMBER OF TRIAL IWl?

YES IQJ:

0 NO

TRIAL ATIORNEY?

YES 1KI

0 NO

TRIAL ATIORNEY?

YES £9-

0 NO

DESIGNATED AS LOCAL COUNSEL?

0 YES

0 NO

(C)
SIGNATURE

(0)
SIGNATURE

NAME

NAME

FlAM

FIRM

STREET ADDRESS

STREET ADDRESS

CrrY/STATE/Z[P

CfTY/sTATE/ZIP

TELEPHONE NUMBER

TELEPHONE NUMBER

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (SEE ITEM .. ON REVERSE)

MEMBER OF TRLAl SAR? TRAL ATIOANEY? DESIGNATED AS LOCAL COUNSEL?

0 YES 0 YES 0 YES

0 NO 0 NO 0 NO

IDENTIFICATION NUMBER (SEE rTEM4 ON REVERSE)

MEMBER OF TRiAl BAR? TRALAnOANEY? OE$lGNATEO AS lOCAl COUNSEL?

0 YES 0 YES 0 YES

,
PLEASE COMPLETE IN ACCORDANCE WITH INSTRUCTIONS ON REVERSE.

0 NO 0 NO 0 NO

Civil Cover Sheet

&1)

http;//www.ilnd.uscouIts,gov/PUBLIC/Formsiauto.Js·
r-':
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE JOHN W DARRA NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS MAGISTRATE JUDGE LE\
Civil Cover9~e9 6172

This automated JS-44 conforms generally to the manual JS-44 approved by the Judicial Conference of the United States in September 1974, The data is required for the use of the Clerk of Court for the pillpose of initiating the civil docket sheet. The information contained herein neither replaces nor supplements the filing and service of pleadings or other papers as required by law, This form is authorized for use only in the Northern District of Illinois,

Plaintiff(s): U.S, EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION

Defendant(s):AMERlCAN AIRLINES, INC.

County ofResidence:

County of Residence:

Plaintiff's Atty:

Defend~~~" Gordon Waldron
Equal E,~p1oyment

Opportum·ty

Q p ",·tf,v{,t,,,,,,' -~
4(;0'"

CheryITama Ob'lander WINSTON & STRAWN

CommissIOn

500,

W '

Mad,'Is~n

St "

St e,

2800

.:I)J<'eI' t;

35 W, Wacker Dr.

,
Chicago,

u{JJ IL 60601-0703

Chicago, Ilhnols 60661

(312) 558-5797

(312) 353-7525

II Basis ofJurisdiction:

1. U.S. Gov't Plaintiff

III. Citizenship of Principal Parties (Diversity Cases Only)
Plaintiff:- NtA Defendant:- NtA

N, Origin:

1. Original Proceeding

c:

C)
N

(f)

~:::"

cVo,,
=:::::~'rr:,',

c-
GJ ''0 CO?

-'1
r:"'1
C.,.J

V

C-) :;,;.~,
--l ::::.<

--,0,"

..r';"
.~-

~-.'

"C)
c::

.. b·

::::.0

<::)

-l

(.-.:.'

V. Nature of Suit:

442 Employment

VI Cause of Action:

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. §2000

et seq., and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991,42 U.S.C. §1981a, to

correct unlawful employment practices on the basis of religion.

VII Requested in Complaint

Class Action: Yes

Dollar Demand:

Jury Demand: Yes

VIII This case IS NOT a refiling of a previously dismissed case.

Date:

/\

JUDGE JOHN W DARRAH

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

EASTERN DIVISION

MAGISTRATE JUDGE LEVIN

0 2 C 6 1 7 2 EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY )

COMMISSION,

)

) Civ. Action No.

Plaintiff,

)

v.

)

) COMPLAINT

IJ(JC!f[f!f~ AMERICAN AIRi.INES, INC.,

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

',',

Aue;.2 9200Z)

Defendant.

)

)

NATURE OF THE ACTION

c:

'"
CJ

t:: -n
1...') r---

:::~ ~.-: "") P 1

2".: ~ ,I co 1':-.1

lJ "_'-
--1 ::;.~ :,~! r',":

C'I

--.-.~

~=~~

This is an action under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as &fuended, 42'"

....:..J

C:::J

--1

C-.,)

u.S.C. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VIlli) and Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1991 to correct

unlawful employment practices on the basis of religion and to provide appropriate relief to

Rania Fneiche ("Fneiche"), and a class of applicants who were adversely affected by such

practices. Plaintiff, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC"), alleges that

American Airlines, Inc. ("Defendant") violated Title VII by maintaining a uniform policy

which discriminated against Fneiche and a class offemale Muslim applicants who sought a

reasonable accommodation because of their religion, Islam, and were refused employment

because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet of their religion, Islam.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

1. lurisdictionofthis Court is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 451,1331,1337,

1343, and 1345. This action is authorized and instituted pursuant to Section 706(f)(1) and

(3) ofTitle VII, 42 U.S.c. § 2000e-5(f)(I) and (3) and § 102 ofthe Civil Rights Act of1991,

n
2
42 U.S.C. § 1981A. 2. The employment practices hereafter alleged to be unlawful were and are now
being committed within the jurisdiction ofthe United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.
PARTIES 3. Plaintiff, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, is an agency ofthe United States of America charged with the administration, interpretation, and enforcement of Title VII and is expressly authorized to bring this action by Section 706(f)(1) and (3) of Title VII, 42 U.S.c. Section 2000e-5(f)(1) and (3). 4. At all times relevant, Defendant, has continuously been a Delaware corporation doing business in the Northern District of Illinois and has continuously had at least fifteen employees. 5. At all times relevant, Defendant, has continuously been and is now an employer engaged in an industry affecting commerce within the meaning ofSections 701(b), (g) and (h) ofTitle VII, 42 U.S.C. Sections 2000e(b), (g) and (h).
STATEMENT OF CLAIMS 6. More than 30 days prior to the institution of this lawsuit, Rania Fneiche filed a charge ofdiscrimination with the EEOC, alleging violations ofTitle VII by Defendant. All conditions precedent to the institution of this lawsuit have been fulfilled. 7. From at least November 5, 1996, through about August, 1999, Defendant engaged in unlawful employment practices, in violation ofSections 701 (j) and 703(a) ofTitle

3
VII, 42 V.S.c. Sections 2000e(j) and 2(a). Such unlawful employment practices have included (a) the denial ofa reasonable accommodation to Fneiche's sincere religious practice, (b) failure to hire Fneiche because of her religion, Islam, and (c) failure to hire a class of female Muslim applicants who sought a reasonable accommodation because oftheirreligion and were refused employment because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet of their religion, Islam.
8. The effect of the practices complained of above has been to deprive Fneiche and a class offemale Muslim applicants, who sought a reasonable accommodation because of their religion and were refused employment because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet of their religion, Islam, of equal employment opportunities.
9. The unlawful employment practices complained ofin paragraph 7 above were intentional.
10. The unlawful employment practices complained ofin paragraph 7 above were done with malice or with reckless indifference to the federally protected rights ofFneiche and a class of female Muslim applicants, who sought a reasonable accommodation because of their religion and were refused employment because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet of their religion, Islam.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, the Commission respectfully requests that this Court: A. Grant a permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, its officers, successors, assigns, and all persons in active concert or participation with Defendant, from engaging in

4
any employment practice which discriminates because of religion against female Muslim applicants.
B. Order Defendant to institute and carry out policies, practices and programs which eradicate the effects of its past and present unlawful practices.
C. Order Defendant to make whole Fneiche and class of female Muslim applicants, who sought a reasonable accommodation because of their religion and were refused employment because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet oftheir religion, Islam, by providing appropriate back pay with prejudgment interest, in amounts to be determined at trial, and other affirmative relief necessary to eradicate the effects of its unlawful employment practices, including but not limited to rightful-place hiring of members of the class.
D. Order Defendant to make whole Fneiche and a class of female Muslim applicants, who sought a reasonable accommodation because of their religion and were refused employment because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet oftheirreligion, Islam, by providing compensation for past and future pecuniary losses resulting from the unlawful employment practices described in paragraph 7 above, including medical expenses, in amounts to be determined at trial.
E. Order Defendant to make whole Fneiche and a class of female Muslim applicants, who sought a reasonable accommodation because of their religion and were refused employment because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet oftheir religion, Islam, by providing compensation for past and future non-pecuniary losses resulting from the

'.
5
unlawful practices complained of in paragraph 7 above, including emotional pam, inconvenience, and humiliation, in amounts to be determined at trial.
F. Order Defendant to pay Fneiche and a class offemale Muslim applicants, who sought a reasonable accommodation because oftheir religion and were refused employment because they wore a Hijab (head scarf) as a tenet of their religion, Islam, punitive damages for its malicious and reckless conduct described in paragraph 7 above, in amounts to be determined at trial.
G. Grant such further reliefas the Court deems necessary and proper in the public interest; and
H. Award the Commission its costs in this action.

6
JURY TRIAL DEMAND The Commission requests a jury trial on all questions of fact raised by its complaint.
Respectfully submitted,
GWENDOLYN YOUNG REAMS Associate General Counsel
EQUALEMPLOYMENTOPPOR~TY
COMMISSION

C\mt\AAComplaint

EQUALEMPLOYMENTOPPOR~TY
COMMISSION Chicago District Office 500 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312) 353-7525

 
 Minute Order Form (06191)

States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

John W. Darrah 02 C 6172

Sitting Judge if Other than Assigned .Judge
~.-+----------------------~
9/312002

CASE TITLE

EEOC VS. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

MOTION: DOCKET ENTRY:

[In the following box (a) indicate the party filing the motion, e.g., plaintitr, defendant, 3rd party plaintiff, and (b) state briefly the nature of the motion being presented.]
---~

(I) o

Filed motion of [ use listing in "Motion" box above.]

(2)

o

Brief in support of motion due _ _ _.

(3) o

Answer briefto motion duc.___. Reply to answer brief due_~_

(4) o

Ruling,Hearing on ___ set for ___ at _ _ _.

(5)

o

Status hearing[heldlcontinucd to] [set for/re-set for] on .___ s·::t for

at

(6) o

Pretrial conference[heldlcontinued to] [set for/re-set for) on __~ set for

at _ __

(7) o

Trial[s(Ot for/re-set for] on _____ at ___.

(8) o

[Bench/Jury trial] [Hearing] heldlcontinued to ___ at _ _.

(9) o
• (10)

This case is dismissed [with/without] prejudice and without costslby;agreementlpursuant to]
o FRCP4(m) 0 Local Rule 41.1 0 FRCP41(a)(1) 0 FRCP41(a)(2).
[Other docket entry] Enter Order Of Resolution. Case dosed.

• (11)

[For further detail see order attached to the original minute ordeLI

No notices required, advised in open court.

I--
f\,'o notices required.
I--
Notices mailed by judge's stall".
I--
Notified counsel by telephone.

7 -

Docketing to mail notices.

-

Mail AD 450 Conn.

Copy to j udgelmagistratc~ judge.

c.Qurtroom

LG

cleputy's

illitials

Date/time received in· central Clerk's Office

number of notices
SEP 04 2002 date docketed
dote mailed notice mlliling deputy initials

D,o,cu~,e,rit l'I'~mb.r

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
EASTERN DIVISION

EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OI'PORTUNITY )

COMMISSION,

)

)

Plaintiff,

)

v.

)

)

)

AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.,

)

)

Defendant.

)

)

Clv. Action No. 02 C 6172jjOrYTT.:D

Judgl: Darrah

SI-!' 0; l!J!J?

ORDER OF RESOLUTION

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (hereafter the "Commission" or

"EEOC") filed this action against American Airlines, Inc. ("Defendant" or "American") under

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U. S.c. § 2000e et seq. ("Title VII")

and Title I oftlle Civil Rights Act of 1991. The EEOC alleged that Defendant violated Title VII

by maintaining a work uniform policy which discriminated against Rania Fneiche ("Fneiche"),

and other unknown female Muslim applicants, who sought a n:asonabJe accommodation because

of their religion, Islam, and were refused employment became they wore a Hijab (head scarf)

because of their sincerely held religious beliefs. American denies each and every allegation.

The EEOC, Fneiche and American have determined to 'inally resolve this action through

the agreed entry of this Order of Resolution in order to fUrther the purposes of Title VII.

Findings Having carefully examined the terms and provisions ,)f this Order of Resolution and

based on the pleadings, record and stipulations of the parties, the Court finds the following:

l.The Court has jurisdiction of the subject matter ofthis action and ofthe parties.

'.----_._----_._----_..,.",.., ...,.._--------

2. The terms and provisions of this Order of Resolution are fair, reasonable, equitable

and just. The rights of the EEOC, Rania Fneiche and American are adequately protected by this

Order of Resolution.

3. This Order of Resolution conforms with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and

Title VII and is not in derogation of the rights and privilege:; of any person. The entry of this

Order of Resollution will further the objectives of Tille VII and will be in the best interests of

American, EEOC, Rania Fneiche and the public.

4. Neither of the parties admit or deny the claims, delcnses or contentions of the other

and the Court makes no finding with respect thereto.

WHEREFORE, with the agreement ofthe parties to this action, it is ordered as follows: 5. Within ten (10) business days of its receipt of an executed release (in the form

attached as Exhibit A) signed by Fneiche and as to which Fneiche has been represented by her own

private counsel.. American shall pay Fneiche, in full .md final settlement of all her claims, the

amount of Sixty Thousand Dollars ($60,000) (the "Settlement Amount"). No deductions,

including deductions for income or social security or other taxes, shall be made from the

Settlement Amount. The Settlement Amount shall be paid as fol]ows:

(a) one check shall be made payable to "Ran ia Fneiche" in the amount of Forty
+ K...... r","" !"I""".'\I\ .. 2..0 $. M;d.·.~"", A-v... , ~"'.\.. \L~O.

Five Thousand Dollars ($45,000.00) and sent to 8eNwJlI'IC adt!ress, certified mail, return receipt (1..; c...If,' (,1> 40'{

requested;

J".~./ .~v.

(b) one check shall be made payable to Fneich(,'s attorney "Kamran Memon",

and sent to 200 South Michig,m Ave., Suite 1240, Chicago, Illinois 60604, certified mail, return

receipt requested, in the amount of Fifteen Thousand Dollars ($15,000.00). in lieu of attorney's

2

fees that Fneiche would otherwise be obligated to pay, and Mr. Memon agrees that he will not seek from American or Fneiche any other attorney's fees, costs or expenses arising in connection with his representatIOn of Fneiche; and
(c) American will issue an IRS Fonn 1099 to each of Fneiche and Mr. Memon respecting said payments.
6. At the time American sends the above checks, it shall also send copies to Gordon Waldron, regular mail, at EEOC: at the address listed below.
7. American shall not discriminate against any person on the basis of religion by failing to provide, as required by Title VII, a reasonable accommodation to hislher sincerely held religious beliefs or practices.
8. American shall not engage in reprisal or retaliation of any kind against any person because of such person's opposition to any religious discrimination made unlawful under Title VII, or because of filing a charge, testifying or participating in any manner in any investigation, proceeding or hearing alleging religious discrimination under Title VII, or because of such person's seeking or obtaining relief under this Order ofResoluLon.
9. Americ,m shall visibly post at its facilities that receive applications for Passenger Service Agent positions the notice attached as Exhibit B hereto for continuous period of one (I) year.
10. During the tenn of this Order of Resolution, American shall provide written notice to the EEOC: of any complaint it receives of religious discrimination, or of failure to provide religious accommodation, from any Muslim woman who apphcs for a Passenger Service Ag'~nt position, because she wears a Hijab (head scarf) due to her sincerely held religious beliefs, within
3

seven (7) days: (one week) after receiving such complaint. Notices shall be sent regular mail on or before the expiration ofthe seventh (7th) day to Gordon Wald ron, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 500 West Madison Street, Suite 2800, Chicago, ]]]inois 6066l.
II. American and the EEOC shall attempt to 10ca18 any other Muslim woman who at any time since January 9, 1998 was denied a Passenger Servic,~ Agent position because she wore a Hijab (head scarf) because of her sincerely held religious belie Is, as follows:
(a) Within ten (10) days of entry of this Order of Resolution, American shall identify to th(: EEOC any Muslim woman, other than Fneiche, who has filed a charge of discrimination with the EEOC or a state or local govemmental agency at any time since January 9, 1998 through the date of the entry of this Order of Resolution, alleging that American denied her employment because she wore a Hijab (head scarf) because of her sincerely held religious beliefs; and
(b) American shall contact each employee who is currently a member of the "Muslim Employees Employee Resource Group"("MEER Group") and ask them to identify, if they know, any female Muslim applicant rejected for a Passenger Service Agent position by American, from January 9,1998 through the date of the entry of this Order of Resolution, because she wore a Hijab (head scarf) because of her sincerely held religiOUS beliefs. The MEER Group member will be told to inform any such applicant that she should contact the EEOC by telephoning Paralegal Specialist Paula Jackson at (312) 353-7527, or writing her at the address listed below within three (3) months. The notification to members of the MEER Group shall be made by mail to each person identified on the most recent MEER Group membership list (or lists if there is more
4

than one MEER Group) at their respective last known addresses within two (2) weeks of the entry of this Order of Resolution.
12. Should the EEOC receive within three (3) m 3nlhs of the entry of this Order of Resolution infiJrmation about or l1-om any Muslim woman who claims that she applied but was not hired for a Passenger Service Agent position by American because she wore a Hijab (head scarf) because of her sincerely held religious beliefs from January 9, 1998 through the date of the entry of this Order of Resolution, it shall send her the Letter and QuestiOlmaire attached as Exhibit C hereto. The EEOC shall contemporaneously advise American that a Letter and Questionnaire has been sent by sending a copy of any such Letter and Questionm.irc to counsel for American, Cheryl Tama Oblander, Winston & Strawn, 35 West Wacker, ChicagD, Illinois, 60601. The recipient of any Letter and Questionnaire from the EEOC must return the Questionnaire, and any supp0l1ing documentation, to the EEOC so that it is actually received by the EEOC by a date certain not more than forty-five (45) days from the date of the mailing by EEOC and the recipient must simultaneously send a copy to American by mailing the copy 10 Cheryl Tama Oblander, Winston & Strawn, 35 West Wacker, Chicago, Illinois, 60601,
13. If the EEOC receives a completed Questionr.aire from any potential claimant ("Potential Claimant"), American and the EEOC shall determin~ whether there is reasonable cause to believe that the Potential Claimant is a female Muslim who applied for and was refused a Passenger Service Agent position between January 8, 1998 anel the date of the entry of the Order of Resolution be'cause she wore a Hijab (head scarf) because of her sincerely held religious beliefs. Absent reasonable cause to believe that the Potential Claimant was denied such a position because of her sincerely held religious beliefs, the Potential Claimant is not entitled to any relief. In the
5

event that American presents evidence of reasonable cause to believe that it had a legitimate nondiscriminatory reason to have reJused the Passenger Servi ce Agent position to the Potential Claimant or to not have been able to accommodate the Potential Claimant, then the Pot(mtial Claimant is not entitled to any relief. In the event that there is reasonable cause to believe that the Potential Claimant is a female Muslim who applied for and was denied a Passenger Service Agent position by American between January 8, 1998 and the date of the entry of this Ord(:r of Resolution because she wore a Hijab (head scarf) because of her sincerely held religious beliefs, then: (a) American and the EEOC shall negotiate a method or procedure to determine if the Potential Claimant is entitled to monetary relief, and jf so, (be amount; and, (b) within thre(: (3) months of such determination American shall offer the Potential Claimant a Passenger Service Agent Position, at the closest possible location to the current personal residence of the Potential Claimant, if such Potential Claimant so elects on the QuestiOlulaire; provided, however, that (c) in no event shall American be required to offer any such position if it is not hiring Passenger Service Agents at any such location during the three (3) month period; and, (d) such Potential Claimant is otherwise qualified for an offer of a Passenger Service Agent position. Monetary relief may include, back pay, fringe benefits and out of pocket pecuniary losses, subject to mitigation, and interest on such sums through the date of entry of this Order of Resolution.
14. If the EEOC and American are unable (0 aj:;ree on any Potential Claimant's eligibility for monetary relief, the amount of such monetary rei ief and/or the offer of a Passenger Service Agent position, then either party may seek the Court'!; assistance in resolving any such disputes.
6

15. Ifthe EEOC does not receive any completed Questionnaire within the time allowed, then American will have no obligation under this Order of Resolution to provide compensation to any Muslim woman, other than Fneiche, for a claim of having been denied a position as a Passenger Service Agent because she wore a Hijab (head scarl) because of her sincerely held religious beliefs at any time from January 9, 1998 through the date of entry of this Order of Resolution.
16. This Order of Resolution shall be remain in effect for one (1) year from the entry hereof. During that period the Court shall retain jurisdiction to enforce its provisions.
17. The EEOC and American shall each shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. 18. The EEOC agrees that this Order of Resolution fully resolves the claims filed against American in this lawsuit and the Charge of Discrimination filed by Fneiche against American.
[THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]
7

SO AGREED

Nicholas M. Inzeo

Acting Deputy General Counsel

Gwendolyn Young Reams
Associate Genera~cou';~II

z·nto;rDjj.l,/ E al

t

unitYCommW·ssion

L r , .w. .

07

,./i/L/t~

l&:~~P+--A~

Gordon Waldron Equal Employment Opp0l1unity Commission 500 West Madison Street. Suite 2800 Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312) -7525
C-_
Attorney for Rania Fneiche Kamran Memon 200 S. Michigan Ave, Suitel:::Hi'6 \ 1.'( 0
Chicago, II 60604 (311.) "It I· 2.35'1
J.,..LiL~~lra.~Cj&~~
Attorn for American Airlines, mc. ' Cheryl ama Oblander Winston & Strawn 35 West Wacker Chicago, IL 6060 I

Date:~~ Entered>? _ /

2.otJ2----

8

SEE CASE FILE FOR
EXHIBITS

 
 CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 - U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois - Docket... https://ecf.ilnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?105239102020331-L_35...
LEVIN, TERMED
United States District Court Northern District of Illinois - CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 (Chicago)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:02-cv-06172

EEOC v. Amer Airlines Inc Assigned to: Hon. John W. Darrah Demand: $0 Cause: 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)

Date Filed: 08/28/2002 Date Terminated: 09/03/2002 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights: Jobs Jurisdiction: U.S. Government Plaintiff

Plaintiff
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

represented by Gordon G. Waldron United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 353-7525 Fax: (312)35 -8555 Email: gordon.waldron@eeoc.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

John C. Hendrickson United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission 500 West Madison Street Suite 2800 Chicago, IL 60661 (312) 353-8551 Fax: (312) 353-8555 Email: john.hendrickson@eeoc.gov ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant American Airlines Inc

Date Filed 08/28/2002

#

Docket Text

1 COMPLAINT; jury demand - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of John C. Hendrickson, Gordon G. Waldron as attorney(s) for plaintiff ( no summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1-1 through 1-3) (yap) (Entered: 08/29/2002)

1 of 2

6/1/2007 9:04 AM

CM/ECF LIVE, Ver 3.0 - U.S. District Court, Northern Illinois - Docket... https://ecf.ilnd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?105239102020331-L_35...

08/28/2002 09/03/2002

2 JOINT MOTION by plaintiff and defendant for entry of order of resolution (yap) (Entered: 08/29/2002)
3 MINUTE ORDER of 9/3/02 by Hon. John W. Darrah: Case closed terminating case . (Entered Order of Resolution). Mailed notice. (srb) (Entered: 09/04/2002)

PACER Service Center

Transaction Receipt

06/01/2007 09:04:30

PACER Login: hs0328

Client Code: eeoc

Description: Docket Report Search Criteria: 1:02-cv-06172

Billable Pages: 1

Cost:

0.08

2 of 2

6/1/2007 9:04 AM