Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 1 of 11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

AMPARO SANCHEZ and FRANCISCO MARTY.

CASE NO. - - - - - - -

Plaintiffs. v.

CLASS ACTION JURY DEMAND

CARNIVAL CORPORATION; and FATHOM TRAVEL LTD. CORPORATION.

Defendants.

__________________________/

CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT

Plaintiffs, Amparo Sanchez and Francisco Marty ("Plaintiffs"), individually and on

behalf of all others similarly situated, file this Class Action Complaint against the Defendants,

Carnival Corporation and Fathom Travel Ltd., Corporation for violation of Title II of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964.

INTRODUCTION

1. Defendants, Carnival Corporation ("Carnival") and Fathom Travel Ltd.,

Corporation, ("Fathom") (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Defendants") are refusing to

allow Cuban-born persons to board its Fathom cruise line to Cuba, the first American cruise line

to cruise to Cuba in over 50 years.

2. Cuban law currently prohibits Cuban Nationals from traveling to or from Cuba by

ship, including cruise lines and ferries.

3. Defendants have adopted Cuba's policy to disallow Cuban-born persons from

traveling to Cuba by ship.

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 2 of 11
4. Defendants will start operating their first cruise from the port of Miami to Cuba on May 1, 2016.
5. This case presents a model situation for class treatment. Defendants' conduct including its refusal to allow any Cuban-born on the Fathom cruise line to Cuba is uniform among all passengers. The application of Florida federal law to a shared course of conduct will determine liability for members of the putative class as a whole, ensuring that the rights of thousands of individuals are vindicated through the efficiency of a single trial.
PARTIES, JURISDICTION & VENUE 6. During the Class Period, Plaintiff Amparo Sanchez resided in, and continues to reside in, the Southern District of Florida. 7. During the Class Period, Plaintiff Francisco Marty resided in, and continues to reside in, the Southern District of Florida. Francisco Marty is a United States Army Veteran and a frequent passenger on Carnival cruise lines. He is an actual VIP cruiser with Carnival. 8. This is an action for injunctive relief and this Court has federal question jurisdiction as this case arises under federal law- 42 U.S.C. § 2000a. 9. Defendant Carnival Corporation is a Florida Corporation with its principal place of business in the Southern District of Florida. 10. Defendant Fathom Travel Ltd., Corporation is a corporation incorporated in the United Kingdom authorized to transact business in Florida. Fathom is a cruise line company wholly owned by Carnival Corporation. 11. The Court has jurisdiction over Carnival because it is a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in the Southern District of Florida. By conducting business in the Southern District of Florida, Carnival has sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Florida,
2

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 3 of 11
or otherwise intentionally availed itself of the Florida consumer market through the systematic sale of its cruise line reservations to Florida citizens. This purposeful availment renders the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court over Carnival permissible under traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
12. This Court has jurisdiction over Fathom because it is a foreign corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, and is regularly and systematically engaging in business in the Southern District of Florida. By conducting business in the Southern District of Florida, Fathom has sufficient minimum contacts with the State of Florida, or otherwise intentionally availed itself of the Florida consumer market through the systematic sale of its cruise line reservations to Florida citizens. This purposeful availment renders the exercise of jurisdiction by this Court over Fathom permissible under traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
13. Venue is proper in this forum pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1391 because a substantial part of the practices complained of herein occurred in the Southern District of Florida. Further, at all times material to the allegations contained in this Complaint, Defendants personally and/or through an agent:
a. Operated, conducted, engaged in, and carried on a business venture in the Southern District of Florida or had an office or agency in the Southern District of Florida; and/or
b. Engaged in substantial activity within this State and district. 14. All conditions precedent to this action have occurred, been performed, or have been waived.
3

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 4 of 11
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS 15. Carnival is "The World's Most Popular Cruise Line" with 24 ships operating 3 to 16-day voyages around the world. Carnival carries nearly 11 million passengers ever year to ports world-wide. 16. Fathom is the newest brand in the Carnival family and is a subsidiary of Carnival. The Fathom cruise line is scheduled to depart on May 1, 2016 from the Miami port to Cuba. 17. In April 2016, Plaintiffs Amparo Sanchez and Francisco Marty each contacted Fathom Travel separately to make a reservation on the Carnival cruise line, Fathom, to travel to Cuba. 18. Due to Plaintiffs' heavy accents, the Fathom representatives asked Plaintiffs for their country of national origin. 19. Plaintiffs proceeded to tell the Fathom representatives that they are of Cuban national origin. 20. In response, the Fathom representatives explained to Plaintiffs that they could not have a reservation on the Fathom cruise line because they were Cuban Nationals. 21. The Fathom representatives proceeded to explain to Plaintiffs that Carnival has been "working on the issue for months" and did not want to lose the loyalty of their customers. 22. In Fathom's website, one of the frequently asked questions (FAQs) is: "Are Cuban-born U.S. Citizens and/or residents able to participate in a Fathom Cruise with valid U.S. and Cuban passports?" Fathom's response is:
Unfortunately, the Cuban government has a longstanding regulation that prohibit Cuban-born individuals traveling from anywhere in the world to and from Cuba by ship. This regulation applies to all cruise lines, ferries and any form of shipping planning to travel to and from Cuba.
Of course, it is Carnival's policy to obey the regulations and laws of the
4

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 5 of 11
countries we sail to around the world. However, we have requested a reconsideration of this particular regulation especially as it relates to cruise travelers.
We understand and empathize with the concerns being voiced and will continue to work the issue with Cuban officials. It is our hope and intention that we will be able to travel with everyone. About Fathom in Cuba, FATHOM TRAVEL, https://www. Cathom.org/cuba-faq/ (last visited Apr. 12, 2016). 23. Carnival and Fathom have adopted a policy to support Cuba's boycott of Cubanborn individuals from traveling to and from Cuba by ship. 24. As a result of Defendants' discriminatory practices, Plaintiffs and the Class have been denied the full enjoyment of Defendants' place of public accommodation while being discriminated on the ground of national origin.
CLASS ACTION ALLEGATIONS
A. Class Definition 25. Plaintiffs bring this action against Defendants pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure on behalf of all other persons similar situated. Plaintiffs seek certification of the Nationwide Class, defined as follows:
All individuals in the United States born in Cuba that were denied a reservation through Carnival or Fathom cruise lines for travel by ship to Cuba after June 1, 2015 up to and including the present (the "Class"). 26. Plaintiffs reserve the right to modify or amend the definition of the proposed class before the Court determines whether certification is appropriate. 27. Defendants subjected Plaintiffs and the respective Class members to the same discrimination and harmed them in the same manner.
B. Numerosity 28. The proposed Class IS so numerous that joinder of all members would be 5

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 6 of 11
impracticable. Defendants sell (or refuse to sell) thousands of cruise line reservations nationwide. The individual Class members are ascertainable, as the names and addresses of all class members can be identified in the business records maintained by Defendants. The precise number of Class members for the Class is at least in the thousands and can only be obtained through discovery, but the numbers are clearly more than can be consolidated in one complaint such that it would be impractical for each member to bring suit individually. Plaintiffs do not anticipate any difficulties in the management of the action as a class action.
C. Commonality 29. There are questions of law and fact that are common to Plaintiffs and Class
members' claims. These common questions of law and fact predominate over any questions affecting only individual members of the Class. Such questions include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Whether Defendants' cruise line 1s a "public accommodation" pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 2000a;
b. Whether Defendants have a policy of refusing Cuban-born individuals reservations on the Fathom cruise line on the ground of national origin;
c. Whether Defendants' policy violates Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a; and
d. Whether injunctive relief is appropriate to prevent Defendants from continuing to engage in their unlawful and discriminatory conduct.
D. Typicality 30. Plaintiffs are members of the Class they seek to represent. Plaintiffs' claims are
typical of the Class's claims because of the similarity, uniformity, and common purpose of the
6

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 7 of 11
Defendants' unlawful and discriminatory conduct. Class members were denied access to board the Fathom cruise line and sustained the same injury arising out of Defendants' common course of conduct. Each Class member has sustained, and will continue to sustain, damages in the same manner as Plaintiffs as a result of Defendants' wrongful conduct.
E. Adequacy of Representation 31. Plaintiffs are adequate representatives of the Class they seek to represent and will
fairly and adequately protect the interests of the Class. Plaintiffs have retained competent counsel, experienced in litigation of this nature, to represent them. There is no hostility between Plaintiffs and the unnamed Class members. Plaintiffs anticipate no difficulty in the management of this litigation as a class action.
32. To prosecute this case, Plaintiffs have chosen the undersigned law firms, which are very experienced in class action litigation and have the financial and legal resources to meet the substantial costs and legal issues associated with this type of litigation.
F. Requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3) 33. The questions of law or fact common to Plaintiffs and each Class member's
claims predominate over any questions of law or fact affecting only individual members of the Class.
34. Common issues predominate when, as here, liability can be determined on a classwide basis.
35. When determining whether common questions predominate, courts focus on the liability issue, and if the liability issue is common to the class as is the case at bar, common questions will be held to predominate over individual questions.
7

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 8 of 11

G. Superiority

36. A class action 1s superior to individual actions in part because of the non-

exhaustive factors listed below:

a.

Joinder of all class members would create extreme hardship and

inconvenience for the affected customers as they reside all across the

states;

b. Individual claims by class members are impractical because the costs to pursue individual claims exceed the value of what any one class member has at stake. As a result, individual class members have no interest in
prosecuting and controlling separate actions;

c. There are no known individual class members who are interested m individually controlling the prosecution of separate actions;

d. The interests of justice will be well served by resolving the common disputes of potential class members in one forum;

e. Individual suits would not be cost effective or economically maintainable as individual actions; and

f.

The action is manageable as a class action.

H. Requirements of Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(2)

37. Defendants have acted or refused to act in a manner generally applicable to the

class, thereby making appropriate final injunctive relief with respect to the Class as a whole.

38. Defendants' wrongful conduct and discriminatory practice, if not enjoined, will

subject Class members and other members of the public to substantial continuing harm and will

cause irreparable injuries to class members and members of the public who are damaged by

Defendants' conduct.

8

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 9 of 11
COUNT I VIOLATION OF 42 U.S.C. § 2000A (TITLE II OF THE CIVIL RIGHTS ACT OF 1964) (On behalf of the Nationwide Class) Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate paragraphs 1 - 38 above as if fully set forth herein and further allege as follows: 39. This is a claim for an injunction for violations of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000a- § 2000a-6(b). 40. 42 U.S.C. § 2000a, et seq., prohibits discrimination and segregation in places of accommodation. Section 2000a(a) states: "All persons shall be entitled to the full and equal enjoyment of the goods, services, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, as defined in this section, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin." 41. A place of accommodation, as defined by 42 USC 2000a, includes, among other things, "any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than establishment located with a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence." 42 USC§ 2000a(b)(l). 42. Fathom cruise lines are places of public accommodation as defined under Section 2000a. Fathom is an establishment which provides lodging to transient guests. 43. Each Plaintiff and Class member is a member of a protected class. 44. Each Plaintiff and Class member attempted to contract for services with Defendants and to afford themselves the full benefits and enjoyment of a public accommodation -Fathom cruise lines.
9

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 10 of 11
45. Each Plaintiff and Class member was denied the right to contract for those services with Defendants and, thus, were denied those benefits and enjoyments.
46. Plaintiffs and Class members were denied access to a place of accommodationDefendants' cruise ships, on the basis of discriminatory acts by Defendants.
47. Similarly situated persons who are not members of the protected class received full benefits or enjoyment, or were treated better. Namely, non-Cuban Nationals are freely allowed to make reservations with Fathom cruise lines to travel to and from Cuba.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, respectfully demand a judgment enjoining Defendants' conduct, awarding costs for this proceeding and attorneys ' fees pursuant to 42 USC §2000a-3(b), and such other relief as this Court deems just and proper.
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiffs and the Class request a jury trial for all issues which a trial by jury is permitted by law. Dated: April12, 2016.
(mkttlaw.c t Javier A. Lopez, Esq. Florida Bar No. 16727 jal@kttlaw.com Stephanie Moncada Gomez, Esq. Florida Bar No. 112095 sgomez@kttlaw. com KOZYAK TROPIN & THROCKMORTON, LLP 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd., 9th Floor Coral Gables, Florida 33134 Telephone: (305) 372-1800
10

Case 1:16-cv-21319-MGC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/12/2016 Page 11 of 11 Facsimile: (305) 372-3508 -andIs/ Robert W. Rodriguez Robert W. Rodriguez, Esq. Florida Bar No. 856975
ro bertvvrodriguez(Z~gmail. com ROBERT W. RODRIGUEZ, P.A. 5001 SW 74th Court, Suite 105 Miami, Florida 33155 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
11

 
 Case: 1:16-cv-21319 As of: 12/11/2016 04:30 PM EST 1 of 4
U.S. District Court Southern District of Florida (Miami) CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 1:16−cv−21319−MGC

CLOSED,EGT

Sanchez et al v. Carnival Corporation et al Assigned to: Judge Marcia G. Cooke Cause: 28:1331 Federal Question Plaintiff Amparo Sanchez
Plaintiff Francisco Marty

Date Filed: 04/12/2016 Date Terminated: 04/28/2016 Jury Demand: Plaintiff Nature of Suit: 440 Civil Rights: Other Jurisdiction: Federal Question
represented by Robert William Rodriguez Email: robertwrodriguez@gmail.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Stephanie Moncada Kozyak Tropin Throckmorton 2525 Ponce de Leon Blvd, Floor 9 Miami, FL 33134 (305) 372−1800 Email: smoncada@kttlaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Thomas A. Tucker Ronzetti Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton 2525 Ponce de Leon Boulevard Suite 900 Coral Gables, FL 33134−6036 305−372−1800 Fax: 372−3508 Email: TR@kttlaw.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Javier Asis Lopez Kozyak Tropin & Throckmorton PA 2525 Ponce De Leon Blvd Suite 900 Coral Gables, FL 33134 305−372−1800 Fax: 305−372−3508 Email: jal@kttlaw.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Robert William Rodriguez (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Stephanie Moncada (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Thomas A. Tucker Ronzetti (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 1:16-cv-21319 As of: 12/11/2016 04:30 PM EST 2 of 4
Javier Asis Lopez (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant Carnival Corporation
Defendant Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation

represented by Stuart Harold Singer Boies Schiller & Flexner 401 E Las Olas Boulevard Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954−356−0011 Fax: 356−0022 Email: ssinger@bsfllp.com LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Luis Eduardo Suarez Boies Schiller & Flexner 100 SE 2nd Street Suite 2800 Miami, FL 33131−2144 305−539−8400 Fax: 539−1307 Email: lsuarez@bsfllp.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Markenzy Lapointe Boies, Schiller & Flexner LLP Bank of America Tower 100 Southeast 2nd Street Suite 2800 Miami, FL 33131 305−357−8419 Fax: 305−357−8519 Email: mlapointe@bsfllp.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Stephen N. Zack Boies Schiller & Flexner 100 SE 2nd Street Suite 2800, Miami Tower Miami, FL 33131−2144 305−539−8400 Fax: 305−539−1307 Email: szack@bsfllp.com ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
represented by Stephen N. Zack (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Stuart Harold Singer (See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED
Luis Eduardo Suarez (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Case: 1:16-cv-21319 As of: 12/11/2016 04:30 PM EST 3 of 4

Markenzy Lapointe (See above for address) ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Date Filed 04/12/2016 04/12/2016 04/12/2016
04/13/2016 04/13/2016 04/14/2016 04/18/2016 04/18/2016
04/18/2016
04/18/2016 04/18/2016 04/18/2016 04/18/2016
04/18/2016
04/18/2016

# Docket Text
1 COMPLAINT (Class Action) against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00 receipt number 113C−8646982, filed by Amparo Sanchez, Francisco Marty. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lopez, Javier) (Entered: 04/12/2016)
2 Judge Assignment to Judge Marcia G. Cooke (lrz) (Entered: 04/13/2016)
3 Clerks Notice pursuant to 28 USC 636(c). Parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Edwin G. Torres is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the attached form. (lrz) (Entered: 04/13/2016)
4 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez re 1 Complaint filed by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez (Lopez, Javier) (Entered: 04/13/2016)
5 NOTICE of Filing Proposed Summons(es) by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez re 1 Complaint filed by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez (Lopez, Javier) (Entered: 04/13/2016)
6 Summons Issued as to Carnival Corporation, Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Summon(s))(lk) (Entered: 04/14/2016)
7 Plaintiff's MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Their Motion for Preliminary Injunction by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Ronzetti, Thomas) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
8 Plaintiff's MOTION for Preliminary Injunction and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E)(Ronzetti, Thomas) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
9 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stuart Harold Singer on behalf of Carnival Corporation, Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation. Attorney Stuart Harold Singer added to party Carnival Corporation(pty:dft), Attorney Stuart Harold Singer added to party Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation(pty:dft). (Singer, Stuart) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
10 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephen N. Zack on behalf of Carnival Corporation. Attorney Stephen N. Zack added to party Carnival Corporation(pty:dft). (Zack, Stephen) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
11 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Luis Eduardo Suarez on behalf of Carnival Corporation. Attorney Luis Eduardo Suarez added to party Carnival Corporation(pty:dft). (Suarez, Luis) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
12 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Markenzy Lapointe on behalf of Carnival Corporation. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe added to party Carnival Corporation(pty:dft). (Lapointe, Markenzy) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
13 Clerks Notice to Filer re 10 Notice of Attorney Appearance. Attorney Did Not Associate Themselves to All Applicable Parties; ERROR − Filing attorney neglected to associate themselves to all applicable defendants. The Clerk has added the attorney to the defendants. It is not necessary to refile this document. (asl) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
14 NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez re 7 Plaintiff's MOTION to Expedite Hearing on Their Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit) (Ronzetti, Thomas) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
15 Corporate Disclosure Statement by Carnival Corporation, Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation (Singer, Stuart) (Entered: 04/18/2016)

Case: 1:16-cv-21319 As of: 12/11/2016 04:30 PM EST 4 of 4

04/18/2016 04/18/2016 04/18/2016 04/19/2016
04/20/2016
04/21/2016
04/21/2016 04/22/2016 04/28/2016 04/28/2016 04/28/2016 05/03/2016

16 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Stephen N. Zack on behalf of Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation (Zack, Stephen) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
17 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Luis Eduardo Suarez on behalf of Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation. Attorney Luis Eduardo Suarez added to party Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation(pty:dft). (Suarez, Luis) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
18 NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Markenzy Lapointe on behalf of Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation. Attorney Markenzy Lapointe added to party Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation(pty:dft). (Lapointe, Markenzy) (Entered: 04/18/2016)
19 ENDORSED ORDER Setting Status Conference: Parties shall appear for a status conference on April 21, 2016 at 11:30 AM in the Miami Division before Judge Marcia G. Cooke. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/19/2016. (abi) (Entered: 04/19/2016)
20 NOTICE by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez of Filing Evidence of Defendants' Ongoing Discrimination (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Declaration of Michael Lorigas, # 2 Exhibit Declaration of Andres Andres, # 3 Exhibit Settlement Agreement between United States and Carnival) (Ronzetti, Thomas) (Entered: 04/20/2016)
21 ENDORSED ORDER Requiring Supplemental Briefing: Parties shall submit briefing, not to exceed ten (10) pages in length, on or before April 29, 2016, regarding this Court's subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Specifically, parties shall focus on Plaintiffs' standing to bring an action for injunctive relief. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/21/2016. (abi) (Entered: 04/21/2016)
23 Paperless Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Marcia G. Cooke: Status Conference held on 4/21/2016. Court Reporter: Gizella Baan−Proulx, 305−523−5294 / Gizella_Baan−Proulx@flsd.uscourts.gov (im) (Entered: 04/27/2016)
22 NOTICE by Carnival Corporation, Fathom Travel Ltd. Corporation (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B) (Singer, Stuart) (Entered: 04/22/2016)
24 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Due to the End of Carnival's Discrimatory Policy by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez (Ronzetti, Thomas) (Entered: 04/28/2016)
25 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal Due to the End of Carnival's Discriminatory Policy by Francisco Marty, Amparo Sanchez (Ronzetti, Thomas) (Entered: 04/28/2016)
26 ORDER DISMISSING CASE per 25 Plaintiff's Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Due to the End of Carnival's Discriminatory Policy. CASE CLOSED. Signed by Judge Marcia G. Cooke on 4/28/2016. (abi) (Entered: 04/28/2016)
27 TRANSCRIPT of status conference held on 4−21−2016 before Judge Marcia G. Cooke, 1−44 pages, Court Reporter: Gizella Baan−Proulx, 305−523−5294 / Gizella_Baan−Proulx@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 5/27/2016. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 6/6/2016. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 8/4/2016. (gbx) (Entered: 05/03/2016)