. 1 DAVIDJ.PALMER,DC417834 CHEUSTINE ROTH DC 464815
2 LESLIE M. G A R D ~ RC,A 228693
VICTORD.QUINTANILLA,TX24046669
!i 3 Attome s United tates Department of Justice
4 Civil Rights Divisipn
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 5 Washington, D.C. 20035-3968
1 Telephone: 202) 307-3925
6 Facsimile: ( 02) 514-1005 ,
7 Attorne s for Plaintiff IlUnited Ztates of America

2g07APR-4 PtI2.34
CIERX:J.~,~~~:~~:TC~UR.T CE$dTH:ci k i 5 T . OF CALIF. it-s AZGGELES
BY,,

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

CENTRAL DISTIUCT OF' CALIFORNIA

11

12
EARL G. BRANTNER,
13
Plaintiff,
14
v.
15

CASE NO.: COMPLAINT
(C43MUL.S.RCI.G$H5 4T3S01, et seq.)

16 TOTAL LOGISTIC CONTROL, INC.,
17
Defendant.
18

JURY TRIAL DEMAND

19

20
Plaintiff, Earl G. Brantner ("Brantner"), by the undersigned attorneys,
2 1
makes the following averments:
22

23 1. This civil action is brought pursuant to the Uniformed Services
24 Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994,38 U.S.C. $5 4301 - 4333

25 USE^").
26

JURISDICTIONAND VENUE

27 2. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action pursuant to

28 38 U.S.C. $ 4323(b).

3. Venue is proper in this district under 38 U.S.C. 8 4323(c)(2) and 28 U.S.C.
tj 1391(b) because Defendant, Total Logistic Control, Jnc. ("TLCJ'), maintains a place of business in this judicial district.
. . PARTIES 4. Plaintiff Brantner resides in Spartanburg, South Carolina, and consents to the jurisdiction of this Court. 5. TLC maintains a place of business at 9160 Buffalo Ave, Rancho Cucamonga, Califomia 91730, within the jurisdiction of this Court.
CLAIM FOR RELIEF 6. Brantner enlisted in the United States Army in 1982. He was honorably discharged in 1985. Brantner enlisted in the United States Navy in 1986. He was honorably discharged in 1992. 7. On or about February 2001, Brantner joined the Vermont Air National Guard as an A i m First Class (E-3). He later moved to California and transferred into the California Air National Guard. Brantner was assigned to the 163rdAir Refueling Wing of the California Air National Guard. 8. InSeptember2001,BrantnerwaspromotedtoSeniorAimm(E-4). 9: In late 2002, Brantner applied to attend the California Air National Guard's Airrnan Leadership School, in residency, at the suggestion of his commanding officers. 10. On or about February 3,2003, Brantner commenced fill-time employment as a warehouse clerk with TLC at its Ontario Dedicated Warehouse in Rancho Cucamonga, California ("the Warehouse"). 1 1. On or about March 10,2003, Brantner received a phone call fiom Senior Master Sergeant Rachael Del Real informing him that lie had been selected to attend the Aiman Leadership School. 12. On or about March 13,2003, Brantner provided TLC with verbal notice that he would be attending Airman Leadership School.

13. On or about March 25,2003, the California Air National Guard issued a . written order, ordering Brantner to attend the Airman Leadership School, in residency, from April 13 through May 17,2003. 14. Shortly.thereafter, Brantner provided TLC with written notice of the written order. 15. On or about April 4,2003, Gene Tenuta ("Tenuta"), the Warehouse facility manager, met with Brantner and requested that he not attend the Airman Leadership School as ordered. Brantner refused. 16. On or about April 8, .2003,Ken Vogel ('Vogel"), the TLC Warehouse operations manager, met with Brantner'and requested that he not attend the Airman Leadership School as ordered. Brantner refused. 17. On or about April 11,2003, Vogel requested that Brantner sign a letter df voluntary resignation ljrom TLC. Brantner refused to sign the letter of voluntary resignation. Vogel then told Brantner that he no longer worked for the company. Vogel requested that Brantner collect his personal effects and leave the premises. . Shortly thereafter, TLC mailed Brantner a letter stating that it had accepted Brantner's voluntary resignation effective April 11,2003. The letter stated in part "the resignation is a result of your choice to attend a non-mandatory military leadership training course." 18. From April 13 through May 17,2003, Brantner attended the Airman Leadership School. 19. On or about May 19,2003, Brantner returned to TLC and verbally and iri writing requested reemployment. TLC denied him reemployment. 20. TLC has violated Sections 4311 and 4312 of USERRA, among other ways, by discriminating against Brantner, by discharging Brantner, and by denying him reemployment and other employment benefits because of his membership in, service in, application'forservice in, or obligation for service in the uniformed services.

21. TLC's violations of USERRA were willful as TLC knew or showed reckless disregxd for whether its conduct was prohibited under U S E W . Specifically, at a minimum, prior to his termination, Brantner provided TLC with a brochure explaining TLC's obligations under USERRA, and TLC's Tenuta spoke with California Air National Guard Senior Master Sergeant Rachael Del Real and Colonel Rex Hinesly. Moreover, TLC knew about its duty to reemploy
1 servicemembers because its employee information book contained provisions
I1 requiring reemployment of senicemembers. 22. Brantner has suffered substantial loss of earnings and other benefits of employment as a result of TLC's violations of USERRA. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
1 WHEREFORE, Brantner prays that the Court enter judgment against TLC, its officers, agents, employees, successors, and all persons in active concert or participation with it, as follows: 23. Declare that TLC's discharge of, and denial of reemployment to, Brantner were unlawful and in violation of USERRA; 24. Order that TLC fully comply with the provisions of USERRA by reinstating Brantner at the level of seniority, status and compensation that he would have enjoyed had he remained employed continuously with TLC, or provide appropriate fiont pay; 25. Order that TLC pay appropriate backpay, including but not limited to the loss of wages and other benefits suffered by reason of TLC's failure or refusal to Icornplywith the provisions of the law; 26. Find that TLC's violations of USERRA were willful as TLC either knew or showed reckless disregard for whether its conduct was prohibited by USERRA; 27. Order that TLC pay Brantner as liquidated damages an amount equal to the amount of his lost wages and other benefits suffered by reason of TLC's ~ i i l k l violations of USERRA;

28. Enjoin TLC fiom taking any action against Brantner that fails to comply with the provisions of USERRA; 29. Award Brantner prejudgment interest on the amount of lost compensation found due; and 30. Grant such other and further relief as may be just and proper, together with the costs and disbursements of this lawsuit.
ALBERT0 R. GONZALES Attorney General WAN J.. KIM . Assistant Attorney General Civil Rights Division By:
w
DAVID J.+&MER, DC 417834 Chief, Employment Litigation Section
4648 15 Deputy Chief LESLIE M. GARDNER, CA 228693 VICTOR D. QUINTANILLA, TX 24046669 Trial Attorneys EMPLOYMENT LITIGATION SECTION Civil Rights Division U.S. Department of Justice

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY
This case has been assigned to District Judge Stephen G. Larson and the assigned discovery Magistrate Judge is John Charles Jr. Rayburn. The case number on all documents filed with the Court should read as follows:
EDCVO7- 391 SGL (JCRX)
Pursuant to General Order 05-07 of the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the Magistrate Judge has been designated to hear discovery related motions.
All discovery related motions should be noticed on the calendar of the Magistrate Judge

NOTICE TO COUNSEL

A copy of this notice must be senled with the summons and complaint on all defendants (if a removal action is filed, a copy of this notice must be served on all plaintivs).

Subsequent documents must be filed at the following location:

L] Western Division
312 N. Spring St., Rm. G-8 Los Angeles, CA 90012

U Southern Division
411 West Fourth St., Rm. 1-053 Santa Ana, CA 92701-4516

[XI Eastern Division
3470 Twelfth St., Rm. 134 Riverside, CA 92501

Failure to file at the proper location will result in your documents being returned to you.

CV-18 (03106)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT TO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE FOR DISCOVERY

I

1

VICTOR D. QUINTANILLA, TX 24046669

I

US Department Of Justice, Civil Rights Division 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

! I

Washington, DC 20035-5968 Tel(202) 307-3925 Fax (202) 514-1005

I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

I

EARL, G. BRANTNER,

I

1

1

v.

1

TOTAL LOGISTIC CONTROL, INC.,

CASE NUMBER

ORIGINAL

DEFENDANT(S).

SUMMONS

i

TO: TKE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S):

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMOWD and required to file with this court and serve upon plaintiffs attorney

VICTOR D. QUINTANILLA

, whose address is:

i

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION 950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW WASHINGTON, D.C., 20035-5968

an answer to the Elcomplaint

amended complaint counterclaim cross-claim

which is herewith served upon you within 20 days after service of this Summons upon you, exclusive

of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgement by default will be taken against you for the relief

demanded in the complaint.

CV-O1A (01101)

(Seal of the Court)
SUMMONS

VICTOR D. QUINTANILLA, TX 24046669

US Department Of Justice, Civil Rights Division

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20035-5968

Tel(202) 307-3925

1

Fax (202) 514-1005

I

EARL G. BRANTNER,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
II CASE NUMBER

v. TOTAL LOGISTIC CONTROL, INC.,

SUMMONS

TO: THE ABOVE-NAMED DEFENDANT(S):

YOU ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to file with this court and serve upon plaintiffs attorney

VICTOR D. QUINTANILLA

, whose address is:

J

UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

-

CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION

950 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE, NW

WASHINGTON, D.C., 20035-5968

an answer to the Ei complaint

amended complaint counterclaim El cross-claim

which is herewith served upon you within 20 days after service of this Summons upon you, exclusive

of the day of service. If you fail to do so, judgement by default will be taken against you for the relief

demanded in the complaint.

Dated:

4'
APR - 4. 2007'

, ' r & ;, . . %

:, -3 ,
:.<.

. ,.

. .

.

, xC;1;
.."...

Clerk, U.S. District Court ' .:.+f ~ + - ~ $ ~ ~ . $ ~ ~ ~ ~ 7

By:

*xBi . L I Z P A D I L L ~ % '

,,., ...e.: ': ,- $;

. -.'

..

. >+$

... ,,8

- - . .$T'
".rr ,+..s,"

Deputy Clerk

(Seal of the Court)

CV-OIA (01/01)

SUMMONS

 
 1 DAVID J. PALMER, DC 417834

2

CLEHSRLIISETlMN.EGARRODTI\SHER

DC

4648 15 CA 228693

VICTOR D. QUINTAN~LLAT, X 24046669

r.,

I

I

,:: ~J ~ -

i

.4 - ~. .

-
-4
..-.---.

8

KATHY HUGHES

9 Director of Labor & Employment Law

SUPERVALU, Inc.

10 11840 Valley View Road

Eden Pra~rieM, N 55344

1 11 Phone: 952) 828-4623 Fax: (9 2) 828-4403

12

Attorney for Defendant

13 Total Logistic Control, Inc.

P-J L L .
14 pJ :,:;

I

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

'..?
"-
JS-2 Scan Only-

CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

,- ,

16

C'

.,. :

I .-- ;"'? 1 7 + < c --. : ' 18 @ARC, C. BMNTNER,

a'''- ~$//cs&

L J.. '

&
-'

~- I

DOCKET NO: ~

19

@Plaintiff,

EDCV 07-9549SGL

20

v.

1
2 1

STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

TOTAL LOGISTIC CONTROL, INC.,

22

Defendant

23

24

25

26

STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

27

This matter is before the Court for entry of the attached Settlement

28 Agreement ("Agreement") by consent of all parties to effectuate a compromise and

.u;g 1

- - $ 7 .
DL2-.;~!.

!ciJ

17..
), P

~

I

settlement of all claims stemming from plaintiff, Earl G.Brantner's ('Brantner")

employment with defendant, Total Logistic Control, Inc. ("TLC").

Attachment 1. As a result of settlement discussions, Brantner and TLC have

resolved their differences and have agreed that this action should be settled by the

Court's entry of the Agreement. It is the intent of the parties that the Agreement be

a final and binding settlement in full disposition of all claims against TLC that

7 could have been alleged in the Complaint. The parties request that the Court enter

8 the Agreement.

9
10 Dated: fl,i.+/1/ .2&V7

Respecffilly submitted,

ALBERT0 R. GONZALES Attorney General

By:

ON BEHALF OF PLAINTIFF EARL G. BRANTER

ON BEHALF OF D E F E N D A ~ ~ TOTAL LOGISTIC CONTROL, INC.

/254
126

IT IS SO ORDERED:
Dated: ( - / 7 - q

Attachment 1

MTHE UNITED STATES DISTXUCT COUXT
FOR THE CENTRhLDISTRICT OF C A m m
EAS'P'ERlv DIVISION

TOTAL LOGlSTlC CONTROL INC. Defendant

Civil Action No. 07-edcv-391
I Jury Trial Demanded

/
1
1
1.
I
I.
1.
I i
I
I

This matteris before the Carirt for entry of this settlement Agreement C'Agrement'? by
,,
conscnt of a]] parties to effectuate a compromise and settlement of all claimsstemmingfrom
plaintiff, Earl G.~rantner's("%tantner") employmentwith defendantTotal Logistic Co"tro1,
Inc. ('TLC').
. ,
1. Branmer commericed the above entitled a k o n in the United States Disixict Court foi
the CBntntral District of California, Eastern Division, alleging &at TLC violated the Unifomed
- Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act of 1994,38 U.S.C. §$4301 4333
'("USERRG") by discrimiqatingagainst Brantncr, by discharging him, and by denying him
reemployment ~ n odther employment benefits because of his membership in, service in,
application for service in, or obligation for service in the California Air National Guard.
2. As a result of sett~emendtiscussions, Brantncr and TLC have resolved their

' I 1

I

I

i

!
i 1

1 I
I I
I I
i

differences and have agmd.thatthis action should be settled by the court's entrj ofthis Agreement. It is the intent of the parties that this Agreement be a final and binding settlement in
full disposition of a! claims alleged against TLC that could have hen alleged in the Complaint. STIPULATED FACTS
3. Pursuant to USERRA, the parties aolqowledge the jurisdiction ofthe United States District Court for the Central District of California, Eastern Division, over the subject matter of h i s action and of the parties to this case for the purpose of entering this Agreement and, if necessaly, enforcing Lhis'Agreement.
4. Venue is proper in this district for purposes of this Agreement and any proceedings related to this ~Breernent.TLC agrees that all conditions precedent to the insiitution of this lawsuit have bwn fulfilled..
-1
5. 'The parties waive findings of fict and conclusions of law.
. ,.
6 . Having examined the terms and.provisions ofthis Agreement and based on the pleadings record&and the stipulations of the parties, the Court determine tbe following:

. ,,

pmies to this action.
b. The terms and provisionsof this Agreement are fair, reasonable, and jug' and the rights of Branher and TLC are ~rotectedadequately by this Agreement.

USERRA, and is not in derogation ofthe rights and privileges of any pcrson.
d. The entry ofthis Agreemmt will firther the objectives of USERRA and other applicable law, and will be in the best intmsrs of the parties.
NON-ADMISSrn
7. This Agreement, being entered with the consent o f Brantnerand TLC, shall not constitule an adjudication or finding an the merits of the c d e and shall not be construed either as an admission by TLC of any violations of USERRA, or any other law, rule, or regulation dealing with or In donne&on with equal employment opport&ities, or an admission by Branmer as to tho merits of any defcnses asserted by TLC. TLC denies MY wrongdoing.
YON-8. TLC shall not retaliate or interfere with the exercise of any person's rights under
USERRA,or Brantner's claim herein that fom the basis for tho present case, or becausdsuch person gave testimony or assistance or participated in any mannerinany investigation or
proceeding in connection with this case.
, ,
JUWEDIAL RIEOUIREHENTS 9. The parties have agreed to keep confidential cemin ~ r m rselating to Brantner's
reernployrnem with TLC and amounts paid to Branmer in settlement of this case, and have
executed a confidential Private Letter Agreement reflecfing these tens. 10. TLC shall not retaliate against Brantner becausehe h i opposed allegdly unlawful
policies or practices; filed a complaint. either formal or informal, with n C ;filed a claim with the U.S.D e p m e n t of Labor, Veterans' ~ m ~ l o ~ maendn Tt raining Service; or participated in or

cooperated with tbe'initiation, investigation, litigation or administration of this case or this

Decree. TLC shall ensure that Branher will be protecied against Ktaliation. I I . Within five (5) days from the date of entry ofthis Agreement TLC shall pay

Brantner the amount reflected in the confidential Private Letter Agreement referenced in paragraph 9. Ofsuch amount Brantner shell be responsible for paymat of all employee income

laxes associabd with the payment. TLC shall be separately responsible for paying all applicable

federal and state employer taxes. Each party shall provide to the other the appropriate local,

state, and federal tax forms. TLC shall, within twenty (20) days after the entry of this

Agreemenf provide documentaty evidence,of having paid Brantnerthe above amount by mailing

the same to the follo,wingaddress:

Chief Employmknt Litigation Seotion United States Department oflustice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Civil Rights Divislon
Employment Litigation Sedion, PHB,Room 4040
Washingtor+DC 20530
BJL&SE OF ALL C m

-
...

12. By exccuiingthis Agreement, and the PrivateLetter Agreement,and aocepti~gthe

abovbdescribed monetary and non-rn6nmtyrelief, Branber on behalf of himself and his heirs,

successors, and assigns, expressly releases and dircharges.TLC,as well as its current, former and

future ofhcials. ernployees,'agents; and succermn, fium'all legal and equitable claims that were

or could have been brought as of the date of entry of tiis Agreementrelating to Branher's

en~ploymcntwith TLC,includingbut not limited to the claims identified in the Complaint filed

i

I
1

I I

I ' I

I
I

I II
1

1

I I

I
I

, .

I I

1

I

1 I

in Earl CI. Brnntnqr v. .T&l Lo.QisticConbl. lnc., Civil Action No. 07-edcv-391 SGL(JCRx), and USERKA Case No. 09-~~-2004-0031-10~fiGle,d with the United States D e p m e n t of, Labor.
13. l h e Court shall retainjurisdiotion and will have all available equitable powers, including injunctive relief, to enforce this Agreement and the kivate Letter Agreement. Upon motion ofeither p a q , the Court may schedule a hearing forthe purpose of reviewing compliance with his Agreementand thePrivate Letter Agreement. The parties shall engage in
good faith efforts ti resolve any dispute c o n m i n g compliance prior toseekingreview by he
Court. 'Re parties shall be rquired to give notice to each other ten (10) days before moving for
review by the Court. The parties may conduct expedited discovery under the Federal Rules of
Civil Proceduic for the purpose of detetmining compliance with this Agreement or defending a
claim of non-comp~ianoe.
14. The efl'ectivedateofthisAgreement shall be the date it is entered by the Court. 15. This Agreementshall expire, and this aotion shall be dismissed with prejudice,
without fudher order ofthis Coilrt one (I) yaar fmrn't.he, date of eney of this Agreement.
Brantner. by and through his attorneys,may move to extend the Agreement for good cause ifthe
rcrncdial relief called forherein has not bten effectuated. Any such extension may be granted by
thc Court for such time as is necessruy lo effectuate the relief set forth in this Agreement.

I
8.
!

'i i

I
I

I

!
I 1

16. The parties shall bear their own costs and expenses 0f litigntion, including

attomys'fees.

17. This Agreement constitutes the entry of a final judgment within the meaning of

Rule 54 of the Federal Rules ofcivil procedure on all claims asserted in or that could hsve been

asserted by Brantner in thisaction. The Court retains jurisdiction o v a this matter, however, for

the purpose of entering appropriate orders interpreting od enforcing this judgment.

18. By executingthis Agreement, Brnntner expressly acknowledges that he has had

suficient time to review the terms af this Agreement with his anomys, that he has in fact

reviewed the Agreemen6 and that he has voluntarily entered into this Agreement.

19. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be unlawful, only thespecific provision in question shdl be affected and the other provisions will remain in full force md

effect.

20. Tho terms of this Agreementand the Private Letter Agreement are and shall be

binding upon the presmt and future owners, offioers, directors employees, d i t o r s , agents,

trustees, administrators, successors. representatives, snd assigns of TLC and upon the heir$

successors, end assigns of Branmet.

21. This ~greem'enlt,ogether with the ~rivat;Letter Agreement, consthutes the entire

agreement and commitments ofthe

Any modifications to this Agreement, or the Prjvnle

Letter Agreement, mug be mutually agreed upon and memorialized in a writing signed by TLC

and Brantner.

- APPROVED and ORDERED this

day

of

2007.
A

G./=DAVID 1. ALMRR (DCBar NO.417834) Chief
CHRISTINE~ROTIHDCBar No. 464815)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I

Ledif

p

LES~JEM. G A R D N Z (CA BI No. 228693) Trial Attorney

VICTOR D.QUINTANILLA(TX Bar NO. 24046669)
Triel Anomey U.S. ~ e ~ a r t m ionftjustice Civil Rights Division Employment Litigation Section 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Patrick Henry Building, Room 4027 Washington, DC 20530 Telephone: (202) 305-3179 Fsosimile: (202) 514-1 105

Kathy Hughes Direotor of Labor b Employment !AN'
SLJP$KVALU, lnc. 11840 Valley View Road
Eden Prairie, MN 55344
Phone: (952) 828-4623
Fax: (9i2) 8.28-4403 , ON BEHALF OFDEF&'fDANTTOTALLOGISnC CONTROL,MC.

APPENDIX A
RELEASE OF AIL CLAlMS '

For and in consideration oFmy acceptance of the relief, or any part of it, to be provided to me pursuant to the provisionsof thc Settlement Agreement I have signed and that is to be entend in the case o f B d Q . B r m e r v. Toml Loristic Cvnf~oLhc., filed in rhe United States Disttict Court for the Central District o fCalifornia, Eastern Division, J, Earl G.Brantner, hereby forever release and discharge Dekndant in this case, Total Logistic Control, Inc., as well as its
current, former and future officials, employees, agents, and s u m s o r s from a11 legal and
equitable claims arising out of the Complaint filed in this action and USERRA Case No. 09-CA-2004-0003 1-10-0 filed with the United States Department o fLabor.
I undevtand that the reliefto be provided to me by Total Logistic Contro!, Inc., under the terms of the Sealement Agreement does not cohstitute an admission by any of the parties hereby releawd oithe vslidiiy of any claim raised by me, or on my behalf. 1 further understand.that the payments and other terns and conditions set forth in this release are in settlement of disputed
claims.
This release, in conjunction with the &fflementAgreemen4 constitutes the entire .'
agreement betweenTotal Logistic ConGI, Inc.. and me, without exception or exclusion.
I aknowledge that a wpy o f the Settlement Agreement in this action has b m made available to me for my review.
I HAVE READ THIS RELEASE AND UNDERSTANDTHECONTENTS
THEREOF AEJP JqEXECUTETHISRELEASE OF MY OWN FREE ACT AND DEED.
Signature:
Earl 0.Brantner
a t :. 8Nd$&!Id 7

- Subscribed and sworn to before me !his da.yfo

. .

Notary Public

My Commission expires:

 
 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (Eastern Division - Riverside)
CIVIL DOCKET FOR CASE #: 5:07-cv-00391-SGL-JCR

Earl G. Brantner v. Total Logistic Control Inc

Date Filed: 04/04/2007

Assigned to: Judge Stephen G. Larson

Date Terminated: 05/17/2007

Referred to: Magistrate Judge John Charles Rayburn, Jury Demand: Plaintiff

Jr

Nature of Suit: 442 Civil Rights:

Cause: 42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment

Jobs

Discrimination)

Jurisdiction: U.S. Government

Plaintiff

Plaintiff Earl G Brantner

represented by David J Palmer United States Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20035-5968 202-616-9614 LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

Leslie M Gardner US Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW, Suite 4300 Patrick Henry Building Washington, DC 20530 202-514-4092 Email: leslie.gardner@usdoj.gov LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED

V. Defendant Total Logistic Control Inc

Date Filed 04/04/2007

#

Docket Text

1 COMPLAINT against defendants Total Logistic Control

04/04/2007 04/09/2007 04/10/2007
05/17/2007

Inc.(Filing fee $ 0) Jury Trial Demanded. , filed by plaiintiff Earl G Brantner.(am, ) (Entered: 04/09/2007)
FAX number for Attorney Leslie M Gardner, David J Palmer is 202-514-1005. (am, ) (Entered: 04/09/2007)
2 STANDING ORDER by Judge Stephen G. Larson (See original document for futher information)(am, ) (Entered: 04/10/2007)
3 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by plaintiff Earl G Brantner, upon The Summons and Complaint were served by Mailing service on 4/10/07. Due Dilligence declaration not attached. Original Summons not returned. (am, ) (Entered: 04/12/2007)
4 STIPULATION TO ENTRY OF SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND ORDER by Judge Stephen G. Larson : (See document for specifics). (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.)(mrgo, ) (Entered: 05/21/2007)