Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Sciences/Computer_Science)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: specifically dependent continuant(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. capable of(?x, ?y) ∧ specifically dependent continuant(?y)
B. obsolete flowViz(?y) ∧ part of(?x, ?y)
C. part of(?x, ?y) ∧ specifically dependent continuant(?y)
D. obsolete FARMS(?y) ∧ part of(?x, ?y)

Answer: part of(?x, ?y) ∧ specifically dependent continuant(?y)