Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Legal/LKIF_Core_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: Qualification(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. Exception(?y) ∧ qualifies(?x, ?y)
B. Qualified(?y) ∧ held by(?x, ?y)
C. Qualified(?y) ∧ qualifies(?x, ?y)
D. Propositional Attitude(?y) ∧ qualifies(?x, ?y)

Answer: Qualified(?y) ∧ qualifies(?x, ?y)