Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Legal/LKIF_Core_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: Normatively Qualified(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. Normatively Qualified(?y) ∧ normatively comparable(?x, ?y)
B. Normatively Qualified(?y) ∧ normatively equivalent or better(?x, ?y)
C. Allowed And Disallowed(?y) ∧ normatively comparable(?x, ?y)
D. Legal Expression(?y) ∧ normatively comparable(?x, ?y)

Answer: Normatively Qualified(?y) ∧ normatively comparable(?x, ?y)