Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Legal/LKIF_Core_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: Exception(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. Proposition(?y) ∧ evaluatively comparable(?x, ?y)
B. Evaluative Attitude(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
C. Evaluative Proposition(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
D. Proposition(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)

Answer: Proposition(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)