Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Legal/LKIF_Core_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: Qualified(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. Qualified(?y) ∧ qualitatively comparable(?x, ?y)
B. Evaluative Proposition(?y) ∧ qualitatively comparable(?x, ?y)
C. Qualified(?y) ∧ asserts(?x, ?y)
D. Mental Object(?y) ∧ qualitatively comparable(?x, ?y)

Answer: Qualified(?y) ∧ qualitatively comparable(?x, ?y)