Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Business_Finance/Financial_Industry_Business_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: debtor(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. LegalPerson(?y) ∧ has denomination(?x, ?y)
B. debtor(?y) ∧ is played by(?x, ?y)
C. is played by(?x, ?y) ∧ sub-facility(?y)
D. LegalPerson(?y) ∧ is played by(?x, ?y)

Answer: LegalPerson(?y) ∧ is played by(?x, ?y)