Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Legal/LKIF_Core_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: Negated Atom(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. Negated Atom(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
B. Valid Rule(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
C. Atom(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
D. Atom(?y) ∧ rule predicate(?x, ?y)

Answer: Atom(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)