Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Legal/LKIF_Core_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: Continuation(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. Change(?y) ∧ direct part of(?x, ?y)
B. Termination(?y) ∧ direct part of(?x, ?y)
C. Change(?y) ∧ result(?x, ?y)
D. Continuation(?y) ∧ direct part of(?x, ?y)

Answer: Change(?y) ∧ direct part of(?x, ?y)