Task: SWRL-based Rule Reasoning (ontology: Legal/LKIF_Core_Ontology)

Suppose an individual ?x satisfies: Atom(?x). Which composite conclusion is inferred?

A. Argument(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
B. Atom(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
C. Assumption(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)
D. Atom(?y) ∧ rule predicate(?x, ?y)

Answer: Atom(?y) ∧ played by(?x, ?y)