it seems potentially possibly from the fda my problem with a new drug my problem here is with the silencing of information of potential alternative treatments people suppressing any information of any potential alternative treatments the government's saying you are not allowed to speak about alternative treatments the top organizations in the world information organizations big tech saying you're not allowed to discuss uh any alternative and you know it's not an alternative treatment treatment there has been no treatment available if you go right now they put you on a ventilator and they say kiss your ass goodbye which they said yeah was worse some people have said that now that the the the science isn't in but there are some studies that show maybe ventilation is worse intubation can be worse than for example they wanted to maybe conduct some studies on a cpap which they thought might be more effective i have one do you oh my gosh it works this sound like a train coming through when you sleep uh no i mean it's it's i don't bother me well your son's praying to god he falls ask you or you're the roommate i know it works anytime i fall asleep on a plane when i wake up everyone looks at me like i'm a dick that's also because you ordered the fish and ate beef jerky ooh don't sprinkle that's true you're cod with beef jerky and i tell them there's no cure yes and then you smash a soft boiled egg against the vomit value how do you like it you like it now yeah by the way something else is really concerning this is something that we discovered and again all the sources are available URL_TOKEN after we covered ivermectin in great detail on the show the journal of antibiotics retracted an article why on ivermectum and by the way it had nothing to do with cohort oh we didn't cite it as having something to do with covet it was a an article about the mechanism of action of ivermec which took into account several mechanisms of action it's anti-parasitic effect it's protease inhibition effect in other words we used it as a reference and it was removed now to be clear only one month later they published an article on the mechanisms of action for uh mulna pirovir and that was despite the authors admitting the review article appropriately describes the mechanism of action of ivor mektin and none of the authors agreed to the retraction so the statement the reason that they retracted this article was not because it was incorrect it's not even because it had anything to do with covid it's because someone might reference it look at the mechanism of action cross-reference it with other recommended drugs that use a similar mechanism of action and may actually make an informed medical decision between them and their physician we can't have that so they remove the medical information someone argue the science the data that simply explains the mechanism of action how ivermectin works it's gone you can't read up on it now despite the fact that they admit it was correct how is that not ball retractingly terrifying it is it's gonna make them a lot of money maybe just buy their stock now i don't know how do we get in on this game yeah that's a good point can we
NO_SEGMENT_TOKEN