say in the first place destiny what do you think i think the first moment is important i think it's beautiful i think it's all worded and i think freedom of speech as a concept is something that should be defended but i think oftentimes people misapply it to private platforms like twitter and facebook and they try to take these arguments about whether or not the government should abridge our freedom of speech which shouldn't um except in certain dire cases um like yelling fire and crowded theater or the spreading of like trump pornography or something of course i think we all agree with but i think that applying those same arguments to private institutions actually in a way becomes an anti-first amendment argument so i do agree that the first amendment is important in so far as it applies to the government but those principles shouldn't carry forward to every single private platform that we engage with because one of your freedoms as an owner of a private platform is to determine what type of content do i want posted on this particular platform true whatever that platform is after everything after destiny says anything i'm going to be like yes based destiny holy PROFANITY_TOKEN he really brought that one home become a monopoly i think that's a good argument to to come at that point i mean if a platform has become a monopoly then we can talk about anti-trust laws we can talk about things like this but you cannot enforce a platform to just have all content on it i would also push back on that too because it's not a monopoly google facebook these big tech companies they are not actually monopolies they don't fit that definition i think the last time there was a monopoly that had to be broken up was in the NUMBER_TOKENs when it came to microsoft right because they were building their technology in a way that uh uh hindered other software developers from being able to develop uh web browsers that would work as well as the already built in internet explorer so that was considered a monopoly because they were they were uh prohibiting competition that's not what we're seeing with these big tech companies we're like we have alternative ones now like we have parlor we have gab we have i mean we have bit shoot like that's picking up right like there are alternative ones they're just not as good they're not as popular anti-trust laws we can talk about things like this but you cannot enforce a platform to just have all content on it so first amendment true uh why do people keep pretending that facebook is a private platform like it's it's not a definition it's not they literally have former cia agents working within facebook facebook goes into congress you know comes up with a bunch of nonsense after they get accused of something and somehow some way they always end up coming out on top in fact it is literally a law that is allowing them to act as like as arbiters of truthful or false information like because of the law that it's protecting them and whenever anyone goes to try and change it they're the ones who have the money to then influence politicians not that they even have to this guy like just sounds like a drunk grandpa like rambling right now what the the PROFANITY_TOKEN are you on breath but they have the money to influence politicians to make sure that that law that they are benefiting from continues to allow them to
NO_SEGMENT_TOKEN