house yeah i don't want to ship it across the country to you also like i mean i don't know too much about david but he was like basically homeless before his parents took him in which leads to me to believe he uh doesn't have a steady job or any uh uh he he hasn't uh built much of a safety net for himself spending thousands of dollars on pornography the only argument i could see here is if he had some like classic bangers that were actually worth money and then it's like okay well yeah he had like an original film reel of like debbie does dallas yeah if he's running like a successful uh like vintage porn site but he's not this is all personal use yeah this is that is and it's very already in the dumpster behind your local like porn store like he's he's yelling at his dad he's like dad if you want all this porn go on the internet it's like david why don't you go on the internet why do you need all these i need to hold the it's you can't find these it's only on vhs i can't take this down to the local place and have them transcoded do a dvd they'll look at me weird it's not the same so at this point it's hard to really side with i mean look i sided with the father i i don't know too much more about this other than what we're reading so maybe there is some reason to side with david i mean like yeah on the morally i yeah i side with the dad but legally i mean he did leave it at his parents house well that was the parents defense but did it work david clearly has a bit of a porn addiction and uh didn't respect his parents wishes when they gave him a place to live but paul is also extremely judgmental towards his son and destroyed a bunch of his son's property but the courts don't care about family dysfunction they only care about what's outlined in the case and what we have here is a pretty clear-cut case of destruction of property worth thousands of dollars so late last year the court ruled in david's favor with the judge saying there is no question that the destroyed property was david's property defendants repeatedly admitted that they destroyed the property defendants do not cite any statute or case law to support their assertion that landlords can destroy property that they dislike so look in the eyes of the court david wins david wins and and that's it this we gotta live with it NUMBER_TOKEN year old man has uh permanently uh destroyed his relationship with his family over a dozen boxes of very old pornography yeah great job guys but now eight months later eight months after that ruling the the damages have finally been added up this is a doozy the judge has ordered the parents to pay a little over thirty thousand dollars to their son plus another fourteen thousand to their son's lawyer to cover his legal fees wow so that and that thirty thousand dollar figure which seems a bit much that was determined by an expert in pornography valuation that was hired by the defense meaning the parents they were just worthless so yeah you tell us how much it's worth um so yeah
NO_SEGMENT_TOKEN