attacks the shanghai attacks essentially ethereum was uh ddus attacked for like a series of days like weeks and had to like uh implement some emergency patch to to mitigate the uh the threat of this attack and ethereum was not down during that time but it was effectively like unusable or very hard to use because you couldn't get your transactions through and so hudson jameson is a former eth coordinator former ethereum foundation um community community manager community manager and um he's he's saying essentially that this is not at all comparable to the shanghai attacks david why don't you read parts of his thread yeah so hudson says what happened today to salon is not the same thing that happened during the ethereum shanghai attack so in NUMBER_TOKEN but i understand why people think so so a thread hutton says both attacks were dd dos attacks meant to halt block productions so that is similar the big difference is that ethereum blocks never stopped producing during the attacks because of a multi-client design that ethereum has i believe there were two major ethereum clients at the time of shanghai attacks i think there was a third but it was more insignificant there was parody and death and geth was the one being attacked during the shanghai attack so if you had a guest node you would have a real hard problem getting a transaction name but if you had a parry node it was fine it looks like blocks still uh were being produced hudson finish uh continues and saying i do not like the rhetoric and comparisons to ethereum that uh uh yokoshi uh how do you pronounce his name again anatoly anatoly uh the the ceo of solana labs basically the ceo of solana and others have made throughout the day on twitter because it feels disingenuous and feels like it minimizes the issue solana faced i also don't like some people in the ethereum community are bashing solana for having to manually restart ethereum could have just as easily been in a similar position if the emerge had a bug all that being said i hold hold no ill will towards solana and wish them the best so the important differentiator is that ethereum's multi-client design which has saved ethereum multiple times and also has caused bitcoin to have to have to to roll back due to an inflation bug back in NUMBER_TOKEN or NUMBER_TOKEN because ethereum or bitcoin also only has a single client design solana like bitcoin only has a single client design and the whole point about having a multi-client design is that it promotes decentralization there's more than one way to interpret this spec of ethereum and to apply it and to have consensus with other clients and so worst case scenario is that making a transaction on ethereum just becomes difficult also because of ethereum's multi-client design the shanghai attacker had to spend a ton of money a ton of ether to continue to ddos the network dollars millions of how much money that's worth now right yeah it got billions and now it
NO_SEGMENT_TOKEN