as my individual thoughts on how useful that tool was and my experience with it so for this video rather than give a play-by-play comparison of both tools i'm going to give you what i consider the absolute strengths of both and the weaknesses of both as well as my specific recommendation for what you should do with both also i should say i am totally open to representatives from either one of these companies reaching out to me to clarify any points that i feel like i got wrong or to prove me irrevocably wrong if nate is totally off his rocker i don't think i am but i am open to it also i've never done this so early in the video before but if you wouldn't mind taking a moment to boop the like button on this video right now to appreciate yes the amount of research that went into this and also because you may or may not like what i'm about to say thank you guys okay first of all let's talk about what is great about both of these tools they are both very good at giving you access to data that is already available on youtube but making it easier to find whether that be channel lytics in the case of a tubebuddy or just a side-by-side comparison or search results a lot of different examples of like ratios so many things and both of these tools do very well at bringing it up and making it more easily more readily available the other thing i will say about both of these companies is from my interactions with them the creators the developers of both of these companies are great people and they're both have their top goal of helping you and i helping youtube creators to build their channels with that said let's get into the specific strengths of each of these tools and the specific weaknesses so first of all tubebuddy strengths bulk actions they by far have more capability for doing bulk processing on a channel whether that's descriptions cards end screens oh man comments filters so many things are built into tubebuddy that make bulk actions actually incredibly useful for a large channel tubebuddy also has a lot of specific use cases built into their tool they have a lot of things going on over there an example of a specific use case tool i would say is the comment contest winner they have the capability to choose a random commenter across your entire channel or within a specific video or you can even filter by specific keywords they have to say specific keywords it's a very specific use case but when it is used would be very useful and that was the case i saw across the board with tubebuddy they have a lot of that type of stuff going on tubebuddy also has a lot of very interesting things going on in the realms of adding additional functionality to what's already available on youtube for example a b testing retention analyzer and their click magnet tools they're all very interesting and could provide additional insights on a specific case by case basis for almost any channel okay and here's where we get into more of the weaknesses of tubebuddy the first part of their strength is it's a two-edged sword part of their strength is so many specific use cases it's also a weakness there's so much going on in the tool that i get the impression that when the developers are thinking of new features they look at their feedback and they say all right let's add that feature let's add that feature let's add that feature but the problem is after a while
START_INTERACTION_TOKEN also i've never done this so early in the video before but if you wouldn't mind taking a moment to boop the like button on this video right now to appreciate yes the amount of research that went into this and also because you may or may not like what i'm about to say thank you END_INTERACTION_TOKEN