how's it going everybody in this video i have a really important update for you on the duncan v boneta slash duncan v basara california magazine band case the NUMBER_TOKENth circuit on bank panel just issued their ruling and they ruled in favor of california's magazine ban essentially finding in favor of the state of california so let's talk about what happened and what this all means but real quick before we jump into this video if you think california's ban on so-called large capacity magazines is unconstitutional and violates our second amendment rights go hit that like button and subscribe i also wanna give a shout out to one of the main supporters of the channel which is safe life defense safe life defense has some of my favorite soft body armor out on the market and if you're interested right now they're still running their cyber monday sale it's kind of been extended and if you use the code arm scholar you can get NUMBER_TOKEN off of your order so check them out i'll leave a link to them down the details section also i'll let you know that this content is powered by the firearms policy coalition so head on over to URL_TOKEN to help support the second amendment cause thank you again farm's policy collision for supporting this channel so i guess in the intro we received some really important news this morning that the ninth circuit has issued their on bank decision in the duncan v bonta formerly known as the duncan v bacera case which deals with california's ban on large capacity magazines this case is also known as the california freedom week case for those of you who purchased magazines during that freedom week period when the initial decision was made by the district court now off the bat the decision by the NUMBER_TOKENth circuit on bank panel was not in favor of our second amendment rights here in the state of california and it was not in favor of our right to possess magazines that hold more than NUMBER_TOKEN rounds in this video i'm going to give a quick rundown on the decision and answer one of the important questions i'm sure a lot of you guys have about the impact of this on-bonk panel decision now what is going on with this case for those of you who aren't aware this is a case in california that involves the possession of so-called large capacity magazines under california penal code section NUMBER_TOKEN the state of california bans the buying selling possession etc of magazines that hold more than NUMBER_TOKEN rounds and this applies primarily to just ordinary citizens in the state of california but doesn't apply to individuals like law enforcement officers this law was challenged in federal court and the district court judge roger t benitez or saint benitez issued a ruling that found the law was a violation of our second amendment rights this led to what was called freedom week in california during this week period of time millions of magazines were purchased by lawful gun owners in the state of california now one important aspect of judge benitez's ruling is that he also issued a stay of enforcement against those individuals who lawfully purchased those magazines during that period of time so it became lawful for individuals to possess and use magazines that they purchased during freedom week and essentially he
START_SELFPROMO_TOKEN real quick before we jump into this video if you think california's ban on so-called large capacity magazines is unconstitutional and violates our second amendment rights go hit that like button and subscribe i also wanna give a shout out to one END_SELFPROMO_TOKEN BETWEEN_SEGMENTS_TOKEN START_SPONSOR_TOKEN main supporters of the channel which is safe life defense safe life defense has some of my favorite soft body armor out on the market and if you're interested right now they're still running their cyber monday sale it's kind of been extended and if you use the code arm scholar you can get NUMBER_TOKEN off of your order so check them out i'll leave a link to them down the details section also i'll let you know that this content is powered by the firearms policy coalition so head on over to URL_TOKEN to help support the second amendment cause thank you again farm's policy collision for supporting this channel so i guess in the END_SPONSOR_TOKEN