the print before with that being said i do feel like the dNUMBER_TOKEN or dNUMBER_TOKEN style machine from creality does have potential but it just isn't there and if they do fix those things i really do think they'd have a very solid abs machine but for me the dNUMBER_TOKEN and its current state is really just a swing and a miss and i did happen to see recently that creality announced a few more machines i think there's like another end of three coming out that's got direct drive and auto bed leveling from factory and i i swore that there was a another surmoon in the family that's coming out i don't know if it's a replacement or not and this isn't confirmed i can't remember where i saw it but if they do release another version and it does correct those things that i stated i would love to try it again because again it is a very unique and sort of robust machine as far as the way it's built they just they just didn't go all the way with it i am happy to see that creality is trying out some new things because they have released a ton of machines over the years that are very similar to one another but in this instance with the retail price on this being around NUMBER_TOKEN us dollars you can pick up something like two and a half ender three vNUMBER_TOKENs or two ender three vNUMBER_TOKENs in a pack of different filaments that is definitely the direction i would go over something like the sermon and like i said i do have the ender NUMBER_TOKEN and based off what i'm seeing it definitely looks promising the fact that it is a core xy it does have linear rails i am excited to test it out so again i'm really hoping that it is a little less disappointing than what my experience has been with the dNUMBER_TOKEN and that has been the creality sir moon dNUMBER_TOKEN i hope you guys enjoyed this review i i like to think of myself as a fairly optimistic reviewer and i always try to look on the positives more so than focusing on the negatives but honestly with this printer there just was so many little things that were oversights that it just sort of seems to me like it was rushed out and it wasn't fully thought through and so i i feel like i'd be doing a disservice to not point out all of these things so let me know what you guys think in the comments down below if you guys have any um feedback or recommendations as well again i i throughout this process because it has been many months i did give them some feedback regarding like i said the packaging the thing going on with the lead screw the fact that the strain relief is ridiculous and uh that's the or lack of strain relief and that it should have a top enclosure but if i see that there is quite a few of similar requests i'm more than happy to pass that along crowley in the past has definitely taken some community feedback and implemented that into their products and so i'd like to think that with this new or current generation of printers that they will very likely do the same on that note don't forget to like and subscribe for more great videos we make a video every single week so there's always fresh content coming your way and if you do want to
START_INTERACTION_TOKEN on that note don't forget to like and subscribe for more great videos we make a video every single week so there's always fresh content coming your way END_INTERACTION_TOKEN BETWEEN_SEGMENTS_TOKEN START_SELFPROMO_TOKEN and if you do want to END_SELFPROMO_TOKEN