therefore a view history as this kind of clear dichotomy between these two Sunni versus Shia in some kind of conflict because this divided these this grouping didn't exist historically in the way that we conceive of it today ok so historical facts aside we should also recognize that since the Sunni and Shia often had completely different ideas about Authority this of course affected their own sort of doctrines and ideas too not only was this sort of divided political early on it also eventually became philosophical theological and legalistic because the Shia and Sunni viewed different companions of Muhammad as more or less trustworthy this also affected greatly the the transmission of hadith the stories about the prophet and his companions so the Sunni and Shia often used different collections of hadith from each other which is also the basis of much Islamic law and ritual not only that but the Shias also view the hadith of the Imams as authoritative and not just those of Muhammad and these hadith SAR also frequently used in legal matters as well as time went by theological differences appeared to generally one can say that the more rationalistic Lee based theological school of the Motta's ala which eventually became a minority in the Sunni world was adopted to a much larger degree by the Shiites especially by the twelve or anxiety branches then what does Allah favored a more metaphorical and allegorical reading of Scripture and had a more transcendent view of God without any anthropomorphic features for example what does Allah school was quite popular early on for the Sunnis as well but soon thereafter it lost its prominence to another school called Arshad ISM a more literalist approach which is still the mainstream today the Smyly is in turn went in their own direction heavily inspired by new platonic philosophy their theology is very unique in this context having very different ideas about revelation and metaphysics for example and features many esoteric aspects when it comes to question of thick or jurisprudence there are differences here too while the Sunnis eventually developed to gradually discard things like personal rational efforts by the jurist in favor of the revealed sources like the Quran hadith and analogy and and so on the Shia market a generally has maintained the importance of something called a jihad which could be translated as personal interpretation or personal efforts to interpret while they didn't like things like analogy as much as the Sunnis did when talking about the Sunni world that is often stated that the door to each D had closed around the Year NUMBER_TOKEN and this of course isn't true at all since the people still kept interpreting and are still interpreting today but that's a subject for another video we should remember that these are huge generalizations and that I'm speaking primarily from a historical perspective in fact the concept HD HUD has very much resurfaced in the Sunni world especially in the last two centuries with the emergence of certain reform movements like what is often called Islamic modernism in which people have started to reinterpret and use HD had again to reinterpret the original sources like the Quran which has led to everything from Islamic feminism to al-qaeda so the Sunni schools of law the mother hubs which are the Hanafi the Shafi the Maliki and the Hanbali are independent and difference from the various Shia schools the the the NUMBER_TOKENer school of jurisprudence
NO_SEGMENT_TOKEN