and so this time, I am afraid that no matter how heavy criminal liability may not be able to deter wine constraints driving occurred, but all is generally more rules, would have been less likely sinner in addition, some people even think that opposition to draconian laws not only can not say that aggravated criminal drunk driving prevention but will also result in greater counter this is how you say? [Severe punishment is counterproductive? ] To drunk driving is, everyone knows that drunk driving is a harm to others so under normal circumstances we all know to avoid this risky behavior but for various complex reasons certain someone will finally go to drunk driving that if the current the law is "drunk driving were the only death penalty" that drunk driving parties might then fled before being found becomes more troublesome hit and run some people pointed out that the marginal effect of tion is decremented emphasis from off NUMBER_TOKEN to off NUMBER_TOKEN years , but we may be afraid of life imprisonment from NUMBER_TOKEN years to become a lot of people might choose to fight it, to make it even more dangerous behavior can drink and drive people who have successfully arrested this punishment as life imprisonment, will increase the burden on prisons squeeze resources to educate other inmates trouble, causing a real problem greater social costs Also consider that the issue of compensation of victims and the families of accident casualties because most of the small amount of compensation is not a long time to be locked up in prison people came out without a stable income is also likely to find a job, can not compensate for the loss of so although the victim saw the offender is off, the whip, to be shot may make people feel the satisfaction of everyone, but it might actually not only not reduce the chances of accident or even the damage of a single event becomes larger [our view: cognitive gap between the two sides] before entering the point of view of our special thanks to all the members of Xie Zhiqi seventy-seven because of everyone's support and sponsorship that we can continue to operate the important issue is to make the channel more people to see, really very thank you! If you are willing to support us to go further, please click the "Join" or link information from this column, join our members good, having said that, in the "drunk driving tion" issue above fact, whether to support or do not support people who have agreed to drunk driving ruin a person's life, but the reason why we can not discuss a consensus could be crucial for both sides because of "legal" support people have different expectations tion may be more focused on "justice and punishment of crime" in think only for drunk driving tooth for a tooth to let everyone who can not make the same mistake in the future but also to heal the families of inner trauma because of this very strong feeling of empathy they may feel, is to tion is consistent with social justice that is not supported who is to help drunk driving talk, condone drunk driving guilty but did not support tion, should not think that drunk driving is that they may just be more focused for the "prevention" of fear heavier penalties no way to reduce drunk driving but also for their families and the general law-abiding people to bring greater harm, why they want to use other ways to prevent so people want to achieve these two objectives does not actually look so great on the surface of the key differences is that between the two sides, grasp after the information may be different in different places of care, leading to the emergence of different ideas
START_SELFPROMO_TOKEN before entering the point of view of our special thanks to all the members of Xie Zhiqi seventy-seven because of everyone's support and sponsorship that we can continue to operate the important issue is to make the channel more people to see, really very thank you! If you are willing to support us to go further, please click the "Join" or link information from this column, join our members good, END_SELFPROMO_TOKEN