the biggest fallacy i see is the idea that he was breaking the law and therefore it's impossible assuming he was breaking the law at the time that he acted for him to defend himself wondering why that logic is not applied to rosenbaum and gross and croots but you know they're on the left so they think that antifa members are good people but keep in mind down below first and foremost if you're watching this video on youtube there will be a pinned comment with links to four other video hosting sites that i use keep in mind i make several exclusive videos a day again not sure i'll get to the extra video although there is a literary update so i've got a huge amount of material to do i will be getting back on dailymotion as well but i'm going to put off that announcement because i've still i've got too many videos i've got a backlog at the moment here's the problem with saying you're not allowed to defend yourself or use self-defense as a legal claim if you are in the commission of any other form of crime jaywalking is a crime let's say that i'm jaywalking and someone comes along and shoots me in the head and their defense in court is something to the tune of well you know the i i felt threatened by this person and they can't defend themselves because they're breaking the law let's say for example you're speeding and another motorist starts attacking you or or rams into your vehicle trying to run you off the road um does that preclude your ability to defend yourself in that situation through whatever means you feel necessary are you are you disallowed to do anything other than speed even more in order to flee which kyle ridden house sort of tried to do and failed and that's why the first dude was shot in the first place what happens is you get into a really really dubious situation let's say that i'm unknowingly trespassing on someone's property specifically i'm not doing anything else wrong i'm just i happen to be you know two feet on off of the sidewalk i'm not even aware of that and someone comes out and starts screaming at me and punching me if i punch that person back am i guilty of assault simply because i unknowingly trespassed in some states you have of course castle doctrine not always going to apply in such a situation the idea that written house can't defend himself against multiple assailants would also have to therefore necessarily apply to the people that were attacking him one of which quite literally is invoking the concept of self-defense well he was a active shooter at the time so i pulled out my gun to stop the active shooter well you were there illegally you also illegally were carrying a firearm i'm surprised that nobody points this out in the legacy media um so you couldn't defend yourself either you were taking part in a riot and supposedly after curfew although that charge was dropped for written house and i'm not sure what pertinence that even had the case to begin with and anyway i find it also a little bit funny this is a semi-related topic how a lot of people are saying well written house is done for the jury's allowed to consider whether he
START_SELFPROMO_TOKEN keep in mind down below first and foremost if you're watching this video on youtube there will be a pinned comment with links to four other video hosting sites that i use keep in mind i make several exclusive videos a day again not sure i'll get to the extra video although there is a literary update so i've got a huge amount of material to do i will be getting back on dailymotion as well but i'm going to put off that announcement because i've still i've got too many videos i've got a backlog at the moment here's END_SELFPROMO_TOKEN