really scares me is the age restrictions and the potential for having channel strikes attributed because of darker content you may cover if you ever look at content that i make covering this kind of dark stuff i censor a lot of stuff i put blurs up the ass i am very liberally applying blurs all over the screen simply because i don't want to get a channel strike for covering this kind of content i like covering this content but if i cover this content and i don't cover every single basis i face a channel strike and at that point if i upload something that is blatantly against youtube tos i can't complain i broke the rules it is what it is which is why every time i edit a video like this i scrub through the timeline not once not twice not three sometimes up to NUMBER_TOKEN PROFANITY_TOKEN times that's how insane it's gotten to cover this kind of stuff and even when you get d monetized for covering risque content it baffles me because youtube is one of the only places where that actually ever really happens to this degree a lot of news organizations even on youtube will cover dark very very advertiser unfriendly material yet they don't necessarily face the same demonetization that everyone gets i personally believe anybody that uploads content to youtube if you upload advertiser unfriendly material if youtube is going to yellow dole in everyone they should do it across the board regardless of channel size regardless of how much traction or whatever the channel's identity is whether they're mainstream news or their independent news or if you're gonna monetize one side you should monetize everyone okay either it's advertiser unfriendly for everyone or it isn't but we're gonna get to this in a little bit max uploaded this video and he had received a strike he appealed the strike the strike basically uh the appeal basically just got rejected within minutes from what i understand this doesn't shock me back in the day when i covered the cash app scam uh that video is up doing just fine one day i received a channel strike and uh i didn't understand why to be honest i didn't promote the scam i didn't talk about people go in fact i educated people to not fall for the scam now we all know that youtube is primarily monitored mostly from what it seems with machine learning algorithms there's simply so much content uploaded to this website that to have human beings sitting around watching every hour of uploaded content is literally almost impossible to do okay so when you have machine learning systems i want you to think of it like this when a video is uploaded and completely processed through the system it is constantly being updated with newer features features such as transcripting which allows youtube to get sort of a play-by-play of what each word is being spoken in in a video so in this transcript i believe from at least what i am speculating right now youtube will look through this transcript find a bunch of trigger words or find a bunch of strings that maybe are not exactly aligned with a creator friendly video or sorry an advertiser friendly video and i guess if more strings are detected or maybe a video is flagged and a combination of various factors a strike can be attributed now of course youtube does offer an appeal system however the appeal system like i
NO_SEGMENT_TOKEN