aren't putting forth mental energy to stream your computer is putting forth the energy to run that foreground task that he said is being ran in parallel and with that in mind and p core could just also run the streaming just fine versus the e chord right which i i did like a point he made about like you know people say that's not what the e chords are for it's for running background tasks and he's like i don't think that's fair to say they're for running background tests because that's the only thing they can do well i mean what i would say is i hope um stuff like this eventually goes into which who knows maybe this is a the wrong way to look at it and it would just be better if they kept adding more cores but i don't know if they can though too that's true which he points out they might not literally be able to based on how their architectures work like if the scheduling uh having a bunch of these tiny cores uh on their system can do something like what the dedicated hardware and like the psNUMBER_TOKEN has like it once uh the instruction the scheduling gets better over time maybe this could somehow like speed up loading speeds or something which that would be interesting if they could utilize them more effectively but they'd have to program it specifically to do that and no devs are yet yeah so i i actually think it will be interesting to see if new games utilize them over time better than so maybe alderley gets slightly better over time with newer games than with games that weren't designed with alderlake in mind um because really just no games use the e cores at this point or they don't use them super effectively versus the p cores where it's just in what shadow of the tomb raider like it literally didn't use them at all and in other times it used them but it would just be better to have two more p chords than what you have already right and i think that's where i might i i don't i don't use the word disagree so much as lean in another direction and how it could pan out where he's like you know long term it just doesn't seem like this might age better than you think it might compare to like a zen NUMBER_TOKENd with just NUMBER_TOKEN big cores but a little lower ipc on eight of them like that or i guess on all NUMBER_TOKEN of them compared to eight of alder like i should say but that maybe maybe it because like what he's basically arguing is well the argument is is over time you need more threads and this is kind of adding eight more threads while taking up less space than otherwise and he's like yes but by the time you need more threads you're going to want NUMBER_TOKEN big cores you're not going to want you know eight plus eight and i would say that might end up being true and that's an outcome that we shouldn't discount could happen especially in the midterm but having said that i also think that just neglects that they'll probably do something more with this yeah yeah but then he says by the time any of that's gonna matter though by the way i think his point also was there will be cpu substantially stronger anyways and we'll be laughing about caring how
NO_SEGMENT_TOKEN