WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
I leased this car and have been making payments. I was surprised in the first place to even get it due to my credit situation. But I needed a car after being in 2 car accidents in less than a yr last yr. I have been making payments, some in full, some half and even would try and do 2-3 months. Lately I have been phone calls all day and just about every 2-3 days from different agents even though I had spoken to someone prior to the new calls. The last rep told me that one of my payments that I had made back in XXXX was sent, then returned. Which I was never informed of it nor received it back in my account. I called my bank and they pulled up my payment history and saw where I had made the payment and that it was deposited on their end. XXXX still tried to tell me that when I made the payment, there might not have been enough funds in my account to make the payment. I've tried to explain to them that I use a prepaid debit card and can only spend what is in my account. So if the funds wasn't there, it wouldn't have gone through. They are still trying to tell me that the payment wasn't made, when I got the last call before making this complaint, I had asked to speak to a supervisor, they found one that was available, I was placed on hold and was on hold for over 10mins before I hung up since no one came back to the line.
I currently have a home equity loan wit h BBVA Compass. Rec ently, a leak in shower pipes caused a great deal of damage for which I 've filed an insurance claim with  XXXX   XXXX .  XXXX  has been great to provide payment for me to get my home repaired. I walked in to BBVA Compass t o deposit a check from  XXXX  to get the work done on my home. The branc h manager explained  they were not able to take the check at the branch. I had to sub mit a Hazard Insurance Claim Disbursement Request F orm and send paperwork, along with the check, into the bank. I 've had to pay for the repairs myself while waiting for the checks, already approved by insurance, to be deposited into my account. Currently, I 'm out a little over {$12000.00} and have been forced to take money out of savings to pay bills. The process, according to BBVA  Compass, takes 2 weeks to get funds into an account if you have a Home Equity Loan with  the institution. Two weeks ...?? to process a check from a large, reputable insurance company? I wonde r if BBVA Compass is ca shing the checks and reaping the rewards of interest on my funds? {$12000.00} is not a great deal of money for a financial institution to try and scam, but if all of their other customers are having to deal with the same situation, it could probably add up very quickly.
In XXXX 2012 I bought a Jeep that was financed by a jacked up company called Lobel Financial. I started having problems with them right out of the gate, way before the first payment was ever due. They jacked up my payment by {$66.00} a month claiming that the required proof of insurance had not been provided. They 're blatant liars. Proof of insurance had to be submitted before ever being to take the vehicle from the property. This continued throughout the entire time I had possession of the vehicle. I will be submitting proof of this claim. Before the first payment was due I got sick and was diagnosed with XXXX. I was on LOA for 3 months. I was struggling to survive & they kept jacking the payments up. Maybe a year into it, the picked it up. The Monday morning they took it, they also received a payment. I had called on Friday and given them the information but they made sure they had it picked up before the mail ran that day. While in their possession it was damaged. I fought and got it back but naturally not without additional fees. They made me sign a paper they refused to give me a copy of. I had a witness to that. It went along again for awhile and they did it again. I was n't going to fight for it the second time. The sow that works the XXXX XXXX office sold the vehicle & proceeded to sue me for the what the balance was when they took it which was about {$7000.00}. She really thought she was going to get both. Lobel Financial has repeatedly been asked for the proof of the sale to see what they really got for it and they have refused to provide. When we went to Court she claimed they only charged me {$66.00} one time, but that should never have happened. I maintained the proper insurance the whole time and that proof was submitted to the Court. The DOJ is finally taking a look at the practices of Companies like this. Now she has a XXXX XXXX trying to collect another {$2000.00}, balance is incorrect and not owed. I have submitted a complaint to the CA AG 's ofc to look into this matter as well.
I was enrolled in paperless statements with Citibank. It is a secondary card and I 'm a pay in full customer who has never had a delinquency mark in 28 years on file. After utilizing this card, my work email was changed ( added my middle initial ) at my employers request which caused the electronic statements for Citibank to be returned. 

Subsequently after two full months and Citibank getting returned electronic mail, I was contacted to inform me my account was 30 days behind. I received a call on a Saturday for the first time and called back immediately. I was shocked but quickly realized why I would n't have paid the full balance which was because I never received the electronic statement. I was informed as a customer it is solely my responsibility to inform the financial institution of the change in email address. I was told that Citibank does not monitor return emails, and I asked if that was the same for mailed statements and was told yes. In the event this happens, their is no ability to utilize judgment to determine if based on the customer 's individual circumstances whether to correct the delinquency history. 

Additionally, I am concerned based on my good credit I was n't a priority to call while I was XXXX payment behind and before it impacted my credit history. 

I thanked the escalation representative I spoke to, let him know that I would voice my concern through this channel- unfortunate. 
Again, this is not a financial issue. I paid off the account immediately which I always do, but now I have a 30 day mark on my credit file based for the first time in 28 years.
I had an account with XXXX XXXX Bank in 2006 and they changed the company to XXXX XXXX XXXX. I paid the account several years ago and I recently received a settled in full letter from them the only issue I have is that its still reporting on my credit report only under Experian, it is not reporting under XXXX or XXXX. I would like it to be off of Experian as well so I called the original company however they said that the account is no longer with them so I called XXXX XXXX they sent me settled in full letter however I asked if the account can be taken off of Experian because it is off on XXXX and XXXX however both creditors send me back to the other and XXXX said they do n't know if anything can be done however I feel if its off the other credit unions why is n't if off of Experian, its an old settled in full account if they cant delete like the others then a minimal explanation like paid in full would be more helpful then negative comments. I hope your office can help me.
I had my credit report pulled from the credit bureaus, to see what was on my report for monitoring purposes. I noticed that there were a couple of collection debts reported by a Company called  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX the amount of both accounts is {$0.00}. However, the company is reporting that the account was paid in full for less than the full balance. I sent Portfolio Recovery a validation of debt certified letter on XX/XX/18. While I did receive response letters within the required 30 days, I didnt receive evidence bearing my signature, showing that I ever had a contractual obligation to them or the original creditors. At this time, I am seeking assistance in having Portfolio Recovery remove both debts from all three credit bureaus since they were not able to provide acceptable proof of validation of this debt bearing my signature, and not just a printout of an alleged debt.
A Nissan collections agent called me at XXXX PST on XX/XX/2016. This is a violation of the FDCPA.
He called me at my work. I told him I am not able to take these phone calls at work. 
I told him my work hours and he can call me on my cell phone, before or after those hours. 
He has now contacted me again, at my work, as well as calling my personal cell during my work hours he was provided with. 
He continues to be rude, and very ignorant about working with me, even after I ask set up payments with him.
This is the continuous effort to resolve the dispute I have with American Express on the terms and conditions they are hiding from customers. 

I made the complaint in a previous case XXXX In XXXX 2017, I have signed up for a American Express XXXX cards with the promotion to award XXXX XXXX XXXX reward points after I reach the spending limit of {$3000.00} which I did. I have confirmed multiple times with American Express customer representatives regarding this welcome reward point during and after my application. All those American Express customer representatives have promised and confirmed with me on the recorded line that I should be awarded with those XXXX points after I reached the spending limits which I did. With such promise and conditions, I was convinced and applied for this card with {$95.00} annual fee. Unfortunately, most recently they told me that there was a fine print terms in the application contract that those reward points will not be given to me since I had the similar card before. First, I do n't remember I had similar card before. Second, I did not remember I saw such fine print terms in my application form ( I have included their advisement here for your information, please help me to find where did they ever disclose such condition in the application form?? ), Lastly, I never signed and agree such hidden terms in a written document. Actually I have been asking American Express to provide me the copy of application form which I signed and agreed such hidden terms, they never did sent me a copy. Therefore, I believe this is a very unethical and wrong business practice conducted by American Express. I am urging American Express honor that they have promised to customers and correct their wrong doing.
Recently, I have began cleaning up my credit reports. I have noticed fairly quickly that I had a unimaginable amount of accounts from  XXXX . I began to review these accounts and noticed a few issues almost immediately. The biggest issue is the fact that I I have roughly  XXXX  accounts showing up as closed with a delinquent status. It is also showing that I have a charged of account status of roughly {$32000.00} total. These loans have been negatively effecting my credit and financial situation since  XXXX . I have been denied car loans, credit cards and other financial items directly related to these student loans. My current car loan is at 20.9 % apr for a  XXXX    XXXX   XXXX  . I pay {$410.00} on a vehicle I could be paying {$200.00} a month for. I can not begin to tell you just how negatively this has effected mine and my families life. I hope you can offer some assistance or relief in this matter.
I noticed that a credit card company reported my account on my credit report, even though I am only an authorized user. This is a violation of the FCRA and I respectfully request that you remove this listing immediately. 

According to section XXXX of the FCRA, only information on credit issued to a consumer is allowed. If you are an authorized user, you do not fall under these categories, you are not responsible for the debt and did not receive credit. An authorized user does n't have credit on this account and it 's only the signor that is responsible. So, in essence, if an account on which you are an authorized user shows up on your report, it would be someone else 's credit ( the signor on the account ).
Springleaf Financial Services placed several inquiries on my credit report as a result of someone submitting an application, using my personal information, without my consent. The dates of these inquiries are : XXXX XXXX, 2015 XXXX XXXX, 2015
This complaint is a follow-up complaint to XXXX   submitted on XX/XX/XXXX and closed on XX/XX/XXXX after Penn Credit responded to the complaint. Prior to receiving any response to the complaint referenced above, I emailed both the original creditor, XXXX XXXX XXXX, and Penn Credit, described as a third party collections company. On XX/XX/XXXXand XXXX I received a comprehensive list of bills, payments, and verifications from the original creditor. This shows dates of move in and out of residences covering XX/XX/XXXX thru XX/XX/XXXX. I submit these places of residence and dates appear to be accurate. Close examination of these records shows that the original creditor sets the date of first delinquency as XX/XX/XXXX.This was the first month a fee was charged for an overdue account. Also, the original creditor shows that at no time after XX/XX/XXXX was the account ever brought up to date. Payments were made but not the total amount XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) stated as the amount due. So, it would seem that the date of first and sustained delinquency was XX/XX/XXXX-XX/XX/XXXX and not XX/XX/XXXX or XX/XX/XXXX as Penn Credit reported to XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX. I was under the impression, as per the response to complaint by XXXX XXXX, collections manager for Penn Credit ; he had requested debt verification from XXXX  and updated same as of XX/XX/XXXX ( I believe that may be a typo and XX/XX/XXXX was meant by XXXX XXXX ) Also, as of XX/XX/XXXX he states that an itemized breakdown outlining the debt was mailed to me. And that according to the FCRA he contacted and updated the credit bureaus as prescribed by law. I maintain that he has done none of what was described in the response by XXXX XXXX  when he responded to my original complaint. XXXX XXXX  sent me 3 pages ; a cover letter from Penn Credit, the last month bill from XXXX  of XX/XX/XXXX, and the second page which accompanies the bill from Penelec. No itemized list, no verification showing the accurate date when debt first came due. I know that Penn Credit, once a dispute is filed concerning the date of first delinquency must investigate and correct the date if evidence warrants same. It is apparent that XXXX XXXX did not do his due diligence as required by law. Question : Did XXXX send Penn Credit the same information they did me? Did XXXX or Penn Credit purposely try and conceal the date debt first became due? Did either XXXX or Penn Credit violate laws by not properly or timely fix reported errors of the date of first delinquency? Further, I am still not positive that third parties that aid indigent and XXXX individuals may have paid some of this debt but it was never credited. I applied to several companies, some of which were made available on the XXXX  website, for payment assistance. I am still investigating to see if any payments were made on my behalf. As evidence, I have the emails from XXXX XXXX XXXX responding to my email inquiry. They also sent copies of every bill and payment they claim I made. I have the 3-page response from XXXX XXXX. I have sent evidence of my assertions in this complaint with this complaint.
On XX/XX/XXXX I made a {$1500.00} payment to my citi credit card. The {$1500.00} has been taken out of my checking account at XXXX and paid to citi bank for this account yet citi bank will not release the payment 2+ business days later and doesnt have anyone available to talk to about why this payment is not reflecting on my account. Ive had citi credit card since XX/XX/XXXX, only paid out of one checking account ( the same checking account since XX/XX/XXXX ) and they refuse to release the {$1500.00} in funds they already received from me!? On top of all that, Ive never once since XX/XX/XXXX not paid my account with citi due to insufficient funds. They are thiefs!
XX/XX/XXXX Payment was late, and was reported to credit agencies. 
- I wrote to XXXX about this. Unfortunately, I was out of the Country. The auto payment was canceled because of a fraud warning from my bank. When I returned I made all payments necessary. This was the only time I was late and when I spoke with customer service they said the notice of being late was returned via mail. As this was the first time their policy stated that If I wrote in to this group the late notice would be dropped. It was not. 
XX/XX/XXXX Collection/charge off - This is possible the MOST frustrating event of all. Another driver struck my vehicle and totaled it. The insurance company paid for nearly all of the remaining balance. The unpaid off amount was suppose to be paid by the GAP insurance I had purchased, however they were dragging their feet. I had placed several calls to XXXX  letting them know where we were in the process and CONTINUED making my monthly payments so that I would not receive a late charge. During one of the calls I made to XXXX I was told that payments would not help the total needed to be paid. I asked for two weeks to either get GAP to make a payment or I would. Despite XXXX saying that I would be fine to wait two weeks they reported this to the credit agency. I made a full payment om XX/XX/XXXX in the amount of {$2300.00} with a confirmation number of XXXX. Gap insurance has also made a payment since then. I have not been reimbursed for anything and at last check XXXX says I still owe money.
I have a charge dispute with Discover thats going on 4 months now, for goods and services that were never received. A merchant charged {$6800.00} on XX/XX/XXXX for a siding job on my and my husband 's house. The merchant never delivered the goods or service, and after a year of excuses, the contract was cancelled, and I requested a refund. Through repeated attempts, I have been unable to contact the merchant since then. After failing to resolve this with the merchant, I opened a charge dispute with Discover.

4 months in dispute and this charge has not been settled. Ive provided extensive documentation of the merchants non-delivery and contract breach. Each time I speak to the dispute department, Im told additional information is needed, and I provide this information. However, on my XX/XX/XXXX phone call to the dispute department, I was again told Discover requires additional information, however this time I was told I cant tell you specifically what that information is. The agent also inquired as to why Discover should be responsible for refunding me this money.

Discover claims this is still a valid charge, despite the fact that I never received the goods/services. As the charge is beyond 3 months, Discover no longer has the ability to chargeback the merchant, so the money would come from Discover itself. I believe this is why Discover continues to claim the charge as valid, because it would cost them money otherwise.
I reached out to multiple parties at PNC Bank for 2 issues without any success : 1. {$300.00} new account bonus ( get a different story every time ) 2. Excessive overdraft charges that I can not get any recent response to. 
The following is more information : {$300.00} Bonus I opened a Virtual Wallet Performance Select Checking account with a savings account via a banner ad in XXXX of 2012. The banner ad specified requirements and I met all the requirements. I have been following up for over 4 years now and I get different answers everywhere I go. In 2012, the branch told me to call the XXXX number. They told me that I opened the account in a branch ( XXXX I never visited ) and thus was not eligible. I went back to a branch and was told that sometimes they assign online accounts to branches. I called the XXXX number again and they said there was nothing they could do. I go back to branch and escalate and they have someone from XXXX give me a call. They leave a name and number and no-one returns my call. Finally, I find someone and they say that it 's too old. I find a VP and he forwards it along and another person tells me that they ca n't find any promotion at that time. They ask for proof that there was a promotion ... how am I supposed to do that after all this time? 

Now what is really infuriating ... I never got anyone to respond to this inquiry : overdraft fees that have been applied to my account since opening. I have been charged over {$2000.00} in overdraft fees. 

I think what is most frustrating about the overdraft fees is that PNC has overdraft protection ( that I was never told about until my last conversation a month ago with a rep ). I have called dozens of times and made visits to try and understand the fees and how they relate to Bill Pay, CheckCard purchases, and of course the deposits I make to cover the transactions. While I do n't claim to be the best money manager, I have always moved money to PNC to cover such charges. Also, I 'm confused by the consistency of the messages I get ... in some cases I have the fees refunded, in other situations ( which are the same ) I do n't. I get the line from PNC reps that they can only offer a courtesy refund on charges once a year. But then as I go through my statements, some were refunded well within a year of each other. Also, it seems like I get charged multiple fees on the same day for the same overdraft.
I didnt authorize any of these 4 inquires.I called the credit agency and they could not inform me who input my information SYNCB  XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Bank Creditor Contact Details SYNCB XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, SD XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX See something wrong? 
Find out how to dispute a hard inquiry. 
XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Finance Creditor Contact Details XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, SD XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX See something wrong? 
Find out how to dispute a hard inquiry. 
XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX Finance Creditor Contact Details XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, CA  XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX
I 've called Sallie Mae a few times now to try and get an extended loan for lower monthly payments. They will not offer me this, they instead tell me my two options are putting my loan into forbearance for three months if i pay them a {$50.00} " good faith '' fee OR if i just flat out do n't pay my loan a collection agency will call me and help me set up a payment plan. Both of these options only hurt me and help them in the long run. How are they allowed to try and force me into collecting large amounts of interest or late fees?