WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
I have been a Discover card holder since XXXX. Since that time, I have never had a delinquency with them. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX I gave birth to a baby girl who experienced some health issues. After coming home and getting settled in XXXX, I missed my Discover payment. I called and called Discover to beg them to remove this one late marking off of my credit report. I spoke to account supervisors and asked that I speak to upper management, who they informed me are not accessible by phone. Given my hardship, I ask they please remove this XXXX mark and return my nine year account to good status. 
Thank you
United Wholesale Mortgage got XXXX XXXX XXXX to sign a note and mortgage to United Wholesale Mortgage 's benefit and they advanced no money. The note and mortgage are payable to United Wholesale Mortgage. XXXX XXXX XXXX and United Wholesale Mortgage have a false relationship of " maker '' and " XXXX '' on the note that never should have been released from " closing '' had the real facts been revealed by disclosures required by the Truth in Lending Act. United Wholesale Mortgage securitized the paper but not the debt.
I am a victim of identity theft and have unauthorized and fraudulent inquiries listed on my Equifax credit report. The following inquiries are unauthorized and fraudulent : XXXX, XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, XXXX, XXXX/XXXX/XXXX
Wrong address never lived there : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, NY XXXX
The Stark Collections agency in Wisconsin has contacted me approximately 3 months ago regarding a debt with XXXX  for phone and internet. I explained then that the debt was not valid, that I was disputing it, and that I would like validation MAILED. I have received NOTHING. They reported to the credit bureaus as owing {$510.00} for 5 months when service was was cancelled. XXXX  is a horrid company, and NOT an honest company, and Stark Collections is refusing to send documentation.
I have been requesting verification of the following accounts that Equifax continues to report on my credit file : XXXX XXXX, Tax Lien # XXXX, and Tax Lien # XXXX. Equifax listed XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX, GA XXXX as the source of their verification on XXXX XXXX, 2016. 
On Friday, XXXX XXXX, I directly called the XXXX XXXX XXXX number that is listed on my report at XXXX and spoke with XXXX agent ID # XXXX and she informed me that a security freeze was placed on my account as of XXXX XXXX, 2016. I have attached a copy of my security freeze confirmation that I received directly from XXXX XXXX showing the date of confirmation. I have also attached Equifax 's dispute investigation of the results. 
On Friday, XXXX XXXX, 2016, I also directly called the telephone number listed on my SECURITY FREEZE CONFIRMATION LETTER FROM XXXX XXXX and spoke with XXXX agent ID # XXXX and she also advised me that my security freeze was confirmed and set into place as of XXXX XXXX, 2016. She also told me that there is NO inquiry from Equifax or mode of verification from XXXX XXXX to Equifax showing on my XXXX credit file. And she also stated that XXXX XXXX DID NOT verify the verification that Equifax shows as " reported '' as of XXXX XXXX, 2016. 
I demand that these public records XXXX # XXXX, Tax Lien # XXXX, and Tax Lien # XXXX are removed due to lack of verification and inaccurate reporting of verification date! XXXX XXXX agents assured me that Equifax 's so-called " verification '' on XXXX XXXX, 2016 WAS NOT REPORTED BY THEM BECAUSE MY XXXX CONSUMER FILE HAD A SECURITY FREEZE ON IT ON THAT DATE. 
I have repeatedly requested tangible documentation whether electronically or hard copies and Equifax has yet to verify. All they send is a XXXX XXXX address and a statement saying " the account is verified. '' I demand that these unverified accounts : XXXX # XXXX, Tax Lien # XXXX, and Tax Lien XXXX ARE PERMANENTLY DELETED FROM MY ACCOUNT. I also request an updated XXXX credit report showing the deletions. 
Please see attachments : XXXX security freeze confirmation dated XXXX XXXX, 2016 **Equifax dispute confirmation results showing that XXXX XXXX " reported '' and " verified '' on XXXX XXXX, 2016. 
Please help!
I recently had my old mortgage lender ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, IL ) sell my home loan to Citizens First Wholesale Mortgage Co. Their address is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FL XXXX and phone is XXXX. We have tried several times in XXXX XXXX to get in touch with Citizens First about taking an automatic draft payment from our checking account every month as XXXX XXXX did. They never returned our calls for a couple weeks so we kept calling them back. Finally they did say the first month they needed a check so we sent them XXXX for XXXX. After that they would set up our payment to come out on the XXXX of every month. As of XXXX XXXX our payment of XXXX has still not come out. My husband called last week to find out what was going on and they said they transposed some numbers and our payment would be automatically drafted out in a couple of days. He spoke with someone named XXXX XXXX  week later it still has n't come out. I called them this morning to find out again why it was so difficult to take our money and I do n't want to have any late charges against me. An answering service answered and said they are not accepting calls and lots of other people are mad that no one has returned their calls either. This is crazy that I ca n't get the mortgage company to take my money, do what they say or not even be able to speak with someone from Citizens First now about my mortgage. I am worried about them trying to charge me late fees or having to pay a mortgage payment twice. What kind of fly by night operation is this?
I recently submitted a complaint about transunion. They said they will send another dispute however they are not actually disputing fairly in accordance with the FCRA. I 've asked for the method of verification and they admitted to not actually verifying and if these laws are in place how are they allowed to continue to not follow them. I recorded a conversation with XXXX XXXX with her knowledge and she admits to not being able to verify 2 XXXX XXXX XXXX accounts that they are reporting on my credit report which is harmful to my credit. They are n't verifying the accuracy of these accounts. I do n't have any accounts with XXXX XXXX XXXX as I have never done business with them.
I was out of work from XXXX XXXX, 2016 until XXXX XXXX, 2016 due to a XXXX that required at least XXXX weeks of recuperation without use of my XXXX. My worker 's comp claim was denied. I was attempting to go back on light duty, which my employer denied. I attempted to file a claim for unemployment, because although I had initially been informed I could work light duty, my company would not let me return to work with restrictions. On XXXX XXXX, 2016, I called USAA to inform them that I was out of work, and could not make my auto loan and personal loan payments, and initiated the USAA debt protection coverage. After a week or so, I called USAA. The employee I spoke with told me that my debt protection was in place, and that I did n't need to worry about my payments. Within the next month, I Iearned that that was not in fact the case. I was called by USAA multiple times, and I called USAA multiple times to inform them that I was unable to make my payments and was waiting for the debt protection to make said payments. I ended up having to fill out the debt protection paperwork twice, because they said that I was not out for over 30 days ( this was on XXXX XXXX, 2016, at which point I had in fact been out for more than 30 days ). Because of these delays, USAA has not only assessed both of my accounts with late fees, but they 've also reported my accounts to the credit bureaus. None of this would have happened if the debt protection process was not so cumbersome ( the forms had to be either mailed or faxed ; there are no options to do so electronically ), and if the debt protection had paid on my accounts in a more timely fashion. One of the late charges was reversed, but there are still {$47.00} worth of late charges that USAA refuses to reverse.
Hello, i bought a XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX. They collected first and last payment and the salesman signed me up for automatic debiting from my checking in order to save 0.025 % interest. After accepting this offer, i received a notice of 30 day payment delinquency the next month after i bought this car. XXXX XXXX said the salesmen never submitted my auto debit and was charged a non payment credit hit. I am desperately trying to payoff debt, raise my score back up in order to get purchase my second home but this is stopping my dreams from happening. Please help!!
Experian has continually reported a false chapter XXXX bankruptcy on my credit report that ALL their agents have acknowledge the bankruptcy being reported is under a DIFFERENT name! Experian will not remove the listing even though it's under someone else name due to they keep saying " their '' source verified the information? Experian will not provide me with the name of the source to dispute this directly with them. Under Federal law, any INACCURATE OR INCOMPLETE information must be deleted. How can a company verify information under a different than mine? Easy answer, they are not verifying anything! Over 30 days ago I submitted a written request for Experian to provide me with physical evidence of this chapter XXXX bankruptcy, as XX/XX/2018 they have not. Approximately on or about XX/XX/2018 I called Experian with the Federal Bankruptcy court on the line, Experian reps realize that a officer from the courts was on the line and stated they could not discuss that issue further and stated they would need to end the call if the court ( who they claim is reporting this ) did not disconnect. Experian is a fraud, the CFPB is supposed to protect Americans from these types of companies. They are ruining my life and has caused my great financial harm! I have been fighting with this company for over a year! CFPB, what are you going to do! Experian is breaking every Federal credit reporting law on the books! I am prepared to use every legal recourse available to me to fight this!
On XXXX XXXX 2017 I was to go to XXXX, Florida and purchase a car that my son had found me at the dealership he was currently working at. The company is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I was on my way from XXXX, MS to purchase a vehicle when my son advised he was not getting commission on the vehicle that I was purchasing. He said I could still come purchase it and he would stay through the sale however, he was leaving the company after that. I still had planned on going and he called back and advised that the dealership advised they did n't want my business and XXXX could pack his desk and leave. My son XXXX then called me and told me to turn around they did not want my business and I asked to speak to XXXX the finance person and he refused to speak with me. I have a witness in my car hearing the conversation. I then called back and wanted to make sure they had nothing on my credit. I then come home and checked and sure enough on XXXX XXXX 2017 they checked my credit without my consent or signature. There are several hard inquiries on there now from XXXX XXXX 2017.  I then contacted the XXXX XXXX XXXX after they did n't want to speak with me on the phone, and no one returned my call. XXXX had tried two attempts to resolve the issue, they did n't respond and I received an email on XXXX XXXX 2017 advising no response and this negative information will be reported for three years for XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX of XXXX, Florida. I just purchased a car at the current company my son is a XXXX at and seen there is still the ones from XXXX XXXX 2017. THIS IS THE EMAIL THEY SENT ME : COULD N'T UPLOAD ... .... XXXX Logo XXXX XXXX 2017 XXXX XXXX Re : Complaint # XXXX - XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX In the absence of any response from the company to this complaint despite our two requests to them, we are closing our file on this complaint. This unanswered complaint will become part of the information we report to the public on this company for the next three years. Should any government agency request our files on this company, your complaint will be included. If you have settled this complaint directly with the company, would you please let us know that, as well as any other comments you might have. Your help in doing this is important to ensure that our report to the public on this company is accurate. Thank you for using XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX
We have submitted 5 loss mitigation applications ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX ). Out of these 5 applications we only received 3 denials in a written letter mailed to us. One denial was received on XX/XX/XXXX, 3 months after the initial application was sent. The servicer denied us due to insufficient income, but they were not calculating my husbands/ borrowers income. They claimed they did n't get all of the income information. The other denial was on XX/XX/XXXX, we were denied because I failed to complete a welcome call from the servicer. I did n't receive any letter indicating this step was required in order for my application to get re-reviewed. After that I did 2 welcoming calls, XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX, I was notified via phone that my application was removed as of XX/XX/XXXX. I was not notified about this. My application had been with the servicer since XX/XX/XXXX and I was never told about the removal, I was only requested for additional docs. The servicer again asked for another complete pkt on XX/XX/XXXX and we submitted it on XX/XX/XXXX, and onXX/XX/XXXX we were denied due to insufficient income. And I was asked for another pkt. We sent it on XX/XX/XXXX. Now the servicer said that they will not review my pkt since the acct is 3 yrs past due and the UW has had my pkts for 3 yrs in review. They will only look into transition options. We have complied with the servicer in submitting documents when requested.
The Ohio Attorney General submitted correspondence to remove a State Lien from my credit repository accounts as they have been paid and released. The credit reporting agency has yet to successfully comply with this request after several letters from myself with attached documentation and from the Ohio Attorney General which held the lien. 

Equifax states that they have investigated the information and found the information to be accurate, which they would find it is not if they verified the information through the Ohio Attorney General ( lienholder ). 

What method of verification is Equifax using? Are they using an automated system or actually calling the Ohio Attorney General to verify the information that I 've previously stated? A tax lien is a big deal and it 's inappropriate for due diligence not to be acknowledged for the sake of saving time. 

My complaint was not whether or not the lien could be verified. The complaint was that the agency has not abided by the lien holder 's request to remove the lien from my credit report, as XXXX and XXXX has already done. 

The agency is using simply using a program to scan for information as to calling the Ohio Attorney General 's office directly and verifying that they have, in fact, requested that the lien be removed from all credit reports -- again to which all have complied except Equifax. 

The Ohio Attorney General can be reached at ( XXXX ) XXXX to verify that the lien should be removed. Please do the due diligence required in this matter.
Since XX/XX/2015 I have been in dispute of fraudulent accounts that have been opened in my name. I contacted all three credit bureaus and notified them of my situation. They requested for me to file a police report and send them my identity theft report, both of which I have done. XXXX and XXXX have since removed the accounts from my credit report but Equifax has refused to remove them. I have called Equifax about XXXX times in the last three months and have spoken to many different departments in hopes of getting these fraudulent accounts removed. I have been trying to join the U.S mil-tary since XX/XX/XXXX and have not been eligible due to my credit report have theses fraudulent accounts. I have explained the urgency of my situation to Equifax but they give me the run arounds and keep asking me to send them the save documents I have already sent over 6 times both by certified mailing, fax, and on their website. I have filed a smalls claims against Equifax with a court hearing scheduled on XX/XX/2015 because they are causing me damages and defamation due to their refusal to remove the fraudulent accounts. 

I ask your agency to please assist in contacting Equifax about how they have been handling my investigation and having them due their due diligence properly. At this point, I am missing out on loss income due to not being able to enlist in the military. Please help me as I only want to have these accounts removed from my file. I will be attaching the last documents I have sent to Equifax legal in regards to my situation.
Dear Transunion XXXX, I checked my personal credit report, which I acquired from your organization on XX/XX/2018 and I noticed an unauthorized inquiry had been made on XX/XX/2018. 
I contacted XXXX XXXX  XXXX, who conducted the inquiry and asked them to remove their credit inquiry from my credit profile. 
I request that you initiate an investigation into XXXX XXXX XXXXs ( XX/XX/18 ) inquiry on my credit report to determine who authorized the inquiry. If, once your investigation is complete, you find my allegation to be true, please remove the unauthorized inquiry and send me an updated copy of my credit report at the address listed above. 
Please note that although the inquiry shown on my credit report is a factual record of the company who accessed and reviewed my profile and although it is only logged on the report, when in fact, an inquiry was made ; a record of this activity, pursuant to federal law, must NOT remain a part of record if the inquiry was UNAUTHORIZED. 
If you find the inquiry referenced above to be valid, please send me a description of the procedures used in your investigation within 15 business days of the completion of the investigation. Thank you for your assistance in this matter Very Respectfully, XXXX XXXX
I was in foreclosure after a severe XXXX XXXX  caused me to fall behind in payments. I received a grant from XXXX XXXX the amount of {$48000.00} to get me out of the rears and pay the next 5 months of mortgage payments as I continue to heal and get back to working full time. When the government agency asked Provident Funding for the amount I was in the rears, they paid my rears in full and made my XXXX payment. After Provident received the rears payment and mortgage payment, they reached out to the XXXX and said they had other monies owed from the lawyer and needed to be paid so I do not go back into the rears. I was not informed of this and when the government agency told me, I thought it was odd that my mortgage company never sent me any info on this so I asked them. The Sheriff 's Auction/auctioneer fees were {$4900.00} along with other fees. When I asked the mortgage company about it, they told me that what the lawyer sent. Since this was a little on the high side since it never went to auction, I called the sheriff 's office, my fees charged was {$2400.00}. Now I call the law firm and I 'm told the mortgage company is lying and was never sent a legal bill yet. So Povident called the government agency, demanding more money for a legal bill they never received or paid out with amounts they made up. If this is not illegal I think it should be. This additional money paid out was to go to XXXX and XXXX mortgage payments. I do n't understand how they can give an amount to get current only to come back after being paid to tell a government agency you now owe more to be current and they also sent me a bill to be insured by their insurance company over {$1000.00} for 6 months when they already paid my personal homeowners policy. I no longer trust them, I would have not known I owed any other monies if the government agency did n't call me and the money they took were double what I was being billed by the lawyer ... ...
The complaint and supporting documents are attached.This complaint is against Bank of America, N.A.On XX/XX/XXXX, I filed a CFPB complaint against Bank of America. See complaint number XXXX.On XX/XX/XXXX, Bank of America responded in a letter, alleging that it could not respond to my CFPB complaint because of an, “adversarial proceeding” between me and Bank of America. The letter also instructed me to contact Bank of America with any questions. Exhibit APursuant to the letter, onXX/XX/XXXX, I contacted Bank of America and asked for the contact information of its legal counsel in the “adversarial proceeding” referred to in Bank of America’sXX/XX/XXXX letter. See, Exhibit B. Bank of America received my request on XX/XX/XXXX. See, Exhibit C.I have received no response from Bank of America to what would seem to be a very simply question. Does the CFPB not find it odd, that Bank of America will not identify the “adversarial proceeding” it claims to be engaged in, that prevents it from answering my complaint? Further, is it not odd that Bank of America will not provide the contact information of its legal counsel in that alleged “adversarial proceeding?”I am asking that Bank of America identify the “adversarial proceeding” that it claims to be engaged in, that prevents it from answering my complaint. Further, I am asking that Bank of America provide the contact information of its legal counsel in that “adversarial proceeding.”
XXXX credit card, auto payments stopped around XX/XX/XXXX, was not aware due to I was in the middle of a Military move and preparing for a deployment. 

Was notified by XXXX that they had taken over my XXXX card account, so worked with them to address the issue rather than run from the problem. 

Due to deployment I was not monitoring as I should have been. ( Now I check weekly and I am fixing my creidt ) Paid to debt collector : XXXX XXXX, ( have letter of statement saying account paid in full from XXXX. 

Payments in 3 deposits from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX ( every 15 days ) totaling in {$1900.00}. 

Tried to dispute with all 3 Agencies, no help. Just adjusted verbiage on report.
, On XXXX XXXX 2016, I went into the Suntrust XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Branch, I had received a large deposit that went in my account. I went in to the bank and agreed to pay the entire amounts that I owed Suntrust for a closed checking and savings account. The banker added the amounts and provided me a with-drawal slip for the total amount due, there were two cashier checks made out to the department to which I owed, I have copies. I see on XXXX XXXX 2016 Suntrust processed a draft out of my other account for the same amount that I paid one account on XXXX XXXX 2016. I was never contacted by any representative from Suntrust, had they contacted me I would have gladly told them I had already submitted payment 10 days prior through the banker at the Brank. I do not know what happened by someone did n't research it, I did n't mail the checks the banker handled that I have receipts that it was paid, the original amount clearly shows in my account that this money was in-fact deducted from my account on XXXX XXXX 2016. This is the 2nd time that Suntrust took funds with-out talking to me or even attempting to contact me, back in XXXX I received some funds, I had gone into the branch and spoken to the bankers. I was told my account would be noted that I would make payments on the owed money, two days later they took XXXX out my account leaving with XXXX to pay my bills or even live on, although I new I owed money I had been assured that only the amount I had agreed to would be deducted.