WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
XX/XX/XXXX To whom it may concern : In XX/XX/XXXX, I entered into a contract with XXXX XXXX to install a new furnace and air conditioning unit. As arranged by XXXX, the work was financed by XXXX, via a VISA credit card, [ Account # XXXX - Amount : {$6300.00}, ( see copy included ) ]. 
Approximately one year later and after more than {$2000.00} in payments, I received a notice on the back page of my monthly coupon/statement ( which I did n't notice ) that the VISA feature was being suspended and transferred to a new non-bankcard credit line ( see copy included ) ; to use only for home repairs and only with XXXX specified vendor - XXXX, account # XXXX ( see copy included ). This seemed like a bait and switch deal to me. Needless to say, I was not happy. 
I eventually decided to transfer the balance of the XXXX XXXX card to a legitimate bankcard ( VISA, MC, etc. ), preferably with friendlier terms. I chose a Chase Bank credit card ( per XXXX XXXX ) and applied for the transfer. When my approval was announced it was only for half of the amount requested [ VISA account # XXXX, ( see copy included ) ] and I was informed no changes could be made until after I received my card and paperwork. 
Once I received the card and called Chase Bank, an attempt was made to transfer the remaining balance from the original XXXX XXXX account. I was immediately rejected ( less than 10 seconds ) and I had to suffer another ping on my credit score for the additional credit inquiry ; with no results, despite the representative 's guarded optimism and the short span between inquiries. 
Now I 'm stuck with XXXX credit cards ( each with substantial balances ) and a compromised credit score that I will have to compromise more in order to get the total balance transferred from XXXX XXXX. 
Ideally, I wanted this not to have happened, so I would n't have to pay the price I 'm paying now to fix it ; but my desired resolution would include : -- Complete transfer of the XXXX XXXX balance to one bankcard ( VISA, MC, etc. - preferably the new Chase card I presently have ), with equal or better terms as that Chase card, at no cost to me or my credit score. I no longer wish to do business with XXXX XXXX. 
-- If that option is not possible, I 'd like the remaining balance on my XXXX XXXX card to be converted or transferred to a bankcard ( VISA, MC, etc. ), with agreeable terms and at no cost to me or my credit score. 
Thank you for your consideration.
I disputed a XXXX/XXXX/XXXX charge for {$350.00} to my credit card account by letter to my Credit Card Company on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. The charge was credited back to my account and a dispute opened. I responded to form letters from my Credit Card Company providing the requested information : ( 1 ) form XXXX date XXXX/XXXX/XXXX -response XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, ( 2 ) form XXXX date XXXX/XXXX/XXXX - response date XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, and ( 3 ) form XXXX date XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. The XXXX/XXXX/XXXX form letter provided response from the merchant and requested a " new letter addressing the merchant 's documentation '' to be returned by XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. My credit card account was rebilled by my Credit Card Company for the {$350.00} on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX because " it was determined to be a valid charge. '' My response letter required extensive research and analysis, and was mailed to my Credit Card Company on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX I received a form letter form my Credit Card Company dated XXXX/XXXX/XXXX reporting non-receipt of my response to their XXXX/XXXX/XXXX letter and informing me that the investigation is complete since they did not receive a response and that my account had been rebilled for the disputed amount. On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX I mailed a letter to my Credit Card Company retransmitting the XXXX/XXXX/XXXX response and requesting the dispute be reopened. I then received a XXXX/XXXX/XXXX form letter from my Credit Card Company stating that they have " no further recourse in this matter and can not obtain credit on your behalf. Our investigation remains closed. '' Thus my dispute was closed and the disputed amount charged to my account 9 days after the date of the letter which gave me 20 days in which to respond - my response was mailed 14 days into the allowed response period, and my Credit Card Company denied having received my response 8 days after it was mailed and had not been found some 11 days later. It is a travesty that my Credit Card Company can not or will not timely evaluate information provided by their customer that is critical to my dispute. It is a breach of their responsibility to efficiently process disputes when they are unable or unwilling to timely receive and connect information to the relevant dispute and to process that information in the interest of justice. It is a violation of the dispute process to rebill the disputed amount and close the dispute before the date they request me to respond. The dispute provision is meaningless when the disputed amount is released to the merchant before the customer has adequate time to provide evidence of the validity of the dispute.
On XX/XX/2017 XXXX XXXX XXXX appeared on my credit report with a balance of {$1700.00} ( I am disputing this item ) Please be advised this is my SECOND WRITTEN REQUEST. The unverified items listed below remain on my credit report in violation of Federal Law. You are required under the FCRA to have a copy of the original creditors documentation on file to verify that this information is mine and is correct. In the results of your first investigation, you stated in writing that you verified that these items are being reported correctly? 
Who verified these accounts? 
You have NOT provided me a copy of ANY original documentation required under Section 609 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) & Section 611 ( a ) ( 1 ) ( A ) ( a consumer contract with my signature on it ) and under Section 611 ( 5 ) ( A ) of the FCRA you are required to promptly DELETE all information which can not be verified. The law is very clear as to the Civil liability and the remedy available to me for negligent noncompliance ( Section 617 ) if you fail to comply. I am a litigious consumer and fully intend on pursuing litigation in this matter to enforce my rights under the FCRA
On XXXX XXXX, 2015 I received a bill of {$60.00} from Macy 's American express account. I informed the company the charge was fraudulent. I filled out a statement of fraud letter and mailed this to the company. I then received three calls a day from the collections department regarding non-payment. I informed them the charges were fraudulent and I should not be held responsible. The current date is XXXX 2015 and I continue to receive calls from the collections department.
Specialized Loan Servicing ( SLS ) assumed our loan from XXXX Bank but failed to notify us of the change. Our loan payments continued to be made to our XXXX checking account per the agreement agreed upon when the loan was originated. SLS falsely reported XXXX late payments to the credit agencies greatly harming our credit. I have contacted SLS on numerous occasions and they are unwilling to correct this wrong. Their continued delay continues to cause great harm to my families well being.
By not reporting the entire account number they ( CRA ) are not complying with Section 609 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act.

Per FTC Opinion letter " in sum it is our view that a CRA that always scrambles or truncates account ( or social security ) numbers does not technically comply with Section 609 because it does not provide " accurate '' ( and perhaps not " clear '' ) disclosure of " all information '' in the file.
They have been constantly leaving phone messages over the past several weeks. I can not afford the full amount of the loan payments. I was unemployed for  1.5 ye ars. I was even paying {$150.00} per month during that time out of my savings, which I was living off of.   XXXX  They are now calling family members.
Bank of America just charged me {$35.00} overdraft fee for less than 24 hours when my bank account was negative {$1.00}. That 's a lot of interest for an extremely short term loan on a dollar. When I called to try to get them to refund me, they told me they already had refunded me once in XXXX and therefore they could n't do it again.
I received XXXX calls in XXXX day from citi bank XXXX not the original bank when I applied for the card in 2006 XXXX representing my best buy XXXX in attempt to collect a past due balance I was unaware of and thought I had paid. A {$20.00} late fee was applied to the account, but being that I have been consistent with my payments and was an honest mistake requested that they remove the late charge towards the minimum balance.They refused saying they will only credit the amount which does not help me. In the past companies are forgiving and will lower your minimum contingent that this is not a habitual occurrence and you promise to pay or set up an automatic electronic payment for the balance which I stated to them I was more than willing to make. I requested that they honor this business practices which I was familiar with especially since I NEVER agreed to those terms citi has changed how the handled late fees. I believe one 's money should not be help hostage, just like a thief is not allowed to keep what he stole under the condition that it technically belongs to you and its there for you. Through many years of loyalty they have also refused to lower my exceedingly high interest rate despite multiple request and multiple current payments and use.
XXXX XXXX XXXX Cancel service after having the phones for a week. They claim my number belong to someone else. After contacting fraud department. They advise me go to XXXX XXXX XXXX Corp store. I did. My issue wasn't never resolve. Now it's in collections. They claim I owe {$2600.00}. 

This number came from my son account with XXXX XXXX XXXX. I had this number XXXX for five years.
Pursuant 1692 ( a ) ( b ) the City of XXXX engaged in abusive, deceptive and unfair debt collection practices by booting, impounding and holding consumers vehicles, which contributes to a high number of bankruptcies, material instabilities, job loses, and invasion of ones privacy. Existing laws are inadequate and offers no true remedy, or relief, which forced me to file bankruptcy to get my car back. 
Violations have been detemined after thorough examination of the communication 1692a ( 2 ), FDCPA, conveyed through the mails and received at the consumers ' sanctuary. Employees agents, and or assigns from ARNOLD SCOTT HARRIS, P.C., XXXX XXXX XXXX - XXXX XXXX who operated in the capacity of a debt collector pursuant 1692a ( 6 ), FDPA, because o ARNOLD SCOTT HARRIS, P.C., XXXX XXXX XXXX did violate numerous provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( " FDCPA '' ), Public Law 111-203, title X, 124 Stat.
2092 ( 2010 }.
For years I have not been able to make enough money to live and pay on my loans. I graduated with approximately $ XXXX debt. Over the years what started with an occasional re-deferment went from once per year to 6 months and then to every 3 mo. 's. The charges have accumulated with the debt to over $ XXXX total now. 

There is no program to help get rid of all the charges that Navient and XXXX before gave me. Numerous times through the years I would ask about consolidation of the several loans and was ignored when I asked them to send a paper consolidation application. 

This debt is not the debt that I when to school with. What can be done about this additional amount now?
I am trying to understand why a closed an inactive credit card reflects as open on my credit report while my mortgage which is still actively paid shows no history and closed. This is the home I reside in and intend on paying the loan amount in full. There was a lack of communication during my bankruptcy while attempting to reaffirm this debt.
There are things showing up on my credit numerous of times. Also wrong information inquirys I didnt do mail In forms I didnt do either.
I called Equifax to dispute inquires that I know for a fact were not authorized by myself. These inquiries should not have been allowed to be placed on my file since I did not authorize them. They were not court ordered, for employment, insurance nor for an offer of credit for myself. My dispute came back verified and I know this to be u true as I never attempted to gain credit with ANYONE other then a credit card! This is unsatisfactory and AGAINST THE LAW!!
I went to a credit union, XXXX XXXX to apply for a savings account and was not informed that I my credit report was being pulled for consideration to open the account, causing a hard pull and decrease of my credit score.
Violations of 18 U.S.C.1970 The Anti-SLAPP provision by the Administrative agents of all   XXXX   of our major Credit Bureau 's of Trans Union ,   XXXX   , and   XXXX   that 's amounts to hate crimes and Conspiracy to Commit Fraud, and Rackateering under 18 U.S.C. 1964 ( C ) & 1964 ( d ). There administrative policies and the law states they can not list institutions who inquire about you more than once! What they are doing is listing the institutions that inquire about you repeatedly! What this criminal act does is deny anyone who requests to view your credit report access to your report! This is a violation of F.M.O.C. v. Merrill ( 1979 ). These illegal administrative acts are targeted toward   XXXX   XXXX   Males, and is classified by law as hate crimes!
Ok, so neither my XXXX nor XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) card, both XXXX XXXX backed, were being updated on my Equifax credit report. These account would update every month on both XXXX and XXXX but around 6-8 months ago they both stopped updating on Equifax , the only way I could get them to update was dispute, which would take 30 days to get them to update then the information would be out of date again and I would have to start the process all over again. This should not be the case. I contacted both Equifax and both XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) and XXXX ( XXXX ) and all of them passed the blame onto each other. XXXX and XXXX blamed and Equifax said they never received any information. So basically everyone was passing the buck and no one wanted to take any responsibility nor help resolve the issue. My last conversation with Equifax rep stated nothing they could due to get them to report accurate information other then disputing which I really did n't want to do as it does n't resolve the bigger issue but I said ok. Now 30 day 's later my 2 years of positive credit history with XXXX card has been removed from my Equifax report. This is unacceptable and I want this problem resolved permanently, and as I have had no luck with either of the companies, I am turning to you to hopefully get something done. This is a violation of my rights under FCRA as accurate information is not being furnished to my credit reports which has affected me in my credit approvals for the last 8 months. I want to buy a house next year and ca n't have these people screwing around with my credit reports. Please help me fix this. Also this dispute was not initiated by me, it was the Equifax rep who did it, so I have no idea how he coded the dispute, if it was coded anything other than verifying balance/credit limit etc then he did represent our conversation nor the issue I was calling to resolve. This has been an ongoing terrible experience.
American Express Blue Preferred Cash back Credit Card promised me a {$200.00} bonus if I spent {$1000.00} on their card. They will not give me my bonus. I have complained, and their response is that I had a card previously and that disqualifies me for a bonus. That point was not in the terms of the card agreement that I read online. They mailed me a card agreement for a different offer and tried to pass it off as my credit card offer. They stated that they are reviewing my case, but no one will contact me. I made the requisite charges, I should get the bonus. They easily could have told me I would not get the bonus when I applied for the card.
a collection appeared on my credit report, this company did not inform me before it was added or inform me of my right to dispute. when i called the company they could not find the account.
When we applied for a home equity loan, our bank contacted XXXX XXXX XXXX to do a search. We were called by the bank and told that company said there are XXXX liens against us. I knew that was wrong so I called the courthouse and had copies of the judgements sent to me. It only took me one minute to see that the only thing that matched was my husband 's name. Birth date, address and SS # were all different. I called the XXXX XXXX XXXX company and asked if I could send them proof that these liens were not ours so they could correct their records. They told me no because I am not their client and that I would have to go to the bank and have them correct it. I asked how they could make XXXX such errors and a manager, XXXX XXXX, told me that all they do is match a name to a county. They do not check further unless their client ( in this case my bank or their underwriters ) requested it. So I went to the bank and the manager said they simply have us sign a form declaring that those liens are not ours. They do nothing to correct the error or remove those liens from our report. I asked her to help me find a way to correct this because we did not want our name connected to these offenses. She said she would pass our request on to the underwriters. The underwriters accepted the document we signed declaring the liens were not ours but were n't interested in clearing up the error. Why would any company be allowed to attached lien information based on name only? We live in a small town and there are XXXX or XXXX men that we know of with the same name as my husband, XXXX. I ca n't imagine how many there are in the whole county. The manager at XXXX suggested we were lucky there were only XXXX. That 's XXXX too many as far as I am concerned!! If I had not been such a good customer and well known in our bank, this information could easily have been used to deny us a loan. Someone should be responsible for correcting this but so far no one accepts or cares about it.
On XX/XX/2018 I sent Equifax a certified letter disputing a late payment reported in XX/XX/2018 on an account with XXXX XXXX XXXX. The certified letter was delivered on XX/XX/2018 ( delivery confirmation receipt attached ). In that letter I stated this was a formal dispute & requested validation, made pursuant to the Fair Debit Collection Practices Act & the Fair Credit Reporting Act, within 30 days of the receipt of the certified letter. 31 days after the date of delivery ( XX/XX/18 ), I obtained another copy of my credit report to ensure Equifax had added a notice of dispute on the account, which they had NOT. Equifax is in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Section 623 ( a ) ( 3 ) and by not placing the disclosure within the REQUIRED 30-day period. I have sent Equifax a follow up letter stating the companys violation of federal law, by not properly marking the XXXX XXXX XXXX account with a proper notice of dispute within the required timeframe & that they now must remove the item from my credit file. FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 3 ) - Responsibilities of consumer reporting agencies of information [ 15 U.S.C. 1681s-2 ] ( 3 ) Duty to provide notice of dispute. If the completeness or accuracy of any information furnished by any person to any consumer reporting agency is disputed to such person by a consumer, the person may not furnish the information to any consumer reporting agency without notice that such information is disputed by the consumer. ( B ) Time of Notice ( I ) The notice required under subparagraph ( A ) shall be provided to the customer prior to, or no later than 30 days after, furnishing the negative information to a consumer reporting agency described in section 603 ( p ).
My Payments with Regions credit line in XXXX was late, and was paid in XXXX. Although I paid account to {$0.00}. Regions did not accurately display my payments as they said both months were late. 

I contacted Regions and told them the reason I missed was because of bills not being accurately sent to my address due to me moving, and I also did not get correspondence from Regions that I owed. I thought account was at {$0.00}.
I spoke with a representative of XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Florida. XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX. Regarding a collection account with XXXX XXXX. In speaking with this company, I argued that the collection about information on my report is incorrect and that I would consider making a formal dispute with the credit reporting agencies and contact XXXX XXXX to resolve the problem. The next think I noticed on my credit report a few weeks later is there that I incurred this debt on XXXX XXXX, 2017. I have had no financial transactions with XXXX XXXX XXXX. Nor, have I made any type of formal dispute with them directly. Had I done so, I would have done so in writing. They continue to cause me financial stress and aggravation due to their improper reporting. <P/>I am not disputing that I was indeed terminated business dealings with XXXX XXXX over 5 years ago. In the State of Arkansas, all attempts to collect on this debt have long past the Statute of Limitations of 2 years for this type of account I have not yet disputed this account with the 3 major credit reporting agencies and as of yet, this information continues to appear on my credit report. <P/>There is also inaccurate reporting of the debt owed with an original debt of {$240.00} and an amount owed of {$240.00}. This would assume that somewhere, somehow, I made a {$1.00} payment towards this account thereby giving cause to this unscrupulous, to make changes in the reporting dates in an effort to coerce me into making restitution on a fraudulently reported account.
I received the recorded call on a Sunday. Our credit is perfect and we do not owe anyone. I am tired of these scams calling and want them to stop. The company was Portfolio Recovery and we have never done business with them before.
I am a XXXX veteran. My status was official through the Department of Veterans Affairs in XX/XX/2011. I contacted XXXX and informed them of my XXXX status and I would no longer pursue a college degree. I submitted all required documentation of my status. Somehow the process of discharging my student loan debt, slipped through the cracks and my account showed delinquent. My loans are currently discharged due to my XXXX status, but it should have never been reported as delinquent. ECMC discharged all student loan debt under XXXX application that I filed. The letter for approval states I was eligible as of XX/XX/2011. 
My family and I are suffering greatly by the reporting practices of all XXXX major credit reporting bureaus. Please correct this wrong. 

Thank you, XXXX
When requested, XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) claimed they acted on behalf of XXXX XXXX. However, when asked to provide documentation supporting the debt, XXXX did not respond in a timely manner. Instead, the company would just send letters saying, " this letter verifies that you owe $ XXXX " but without any supporting documentation. 

It took more than a year to get documentation from XXXX XXXX. XXXX never forwarded or provided any proof, even after multiple requests. 

HSBC did not provide notice to me that the account had been transferred and XXXX XXXX refused to provide documentation for a full year. 

XXXX never provided any verification documents even though it was requested on multiple occasions.
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, In XXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX Dear XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX I amrespondingtoyourcontactaboutadebtyou aretryingtocollect. 
I recently received a mail dated XXXX/XXXX/2017 from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to collect a debt in the amount of {$180.00} that just appeared on my credit report on XXXX/XXXX/17 which has grossly lowered my credit score. the information provided in the letter is grossly inaccurate. I do not know the nature of this collection nor am I aware of any unpaid bills from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I have medical insurance and always pay any copays.