WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
I reported to XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX that the XXXX XXXX adverse accounts were the same accounts listed under Department of education as satisfactory accounts. I am no longer liable for any XXXX XXXX accounts. These were paid by insurance. They are also way older than 7 years. I was never given a final response on my dispute filed XX/XX/XXXX. I believe that they thought I would just forget about it. I am XXXX years old and just now learning about credit reports. Instead of teaching me my mother was getting school loans in my name, but that is not the issue. I am no longer liable for them anyway. XXXX has been grossly negligent with my report. They had medical information not coded on my report, listed a XXXX as my address from XX/XX/XXXX and did not list and of my professional work experience from after I graduated college. They only still have a fast food restaurant from XX/XX/XXXX. They had my address as living in XXXX, Ks, XXXX, Ks and XXXX, Ks all in the same month and did not notify creditors about the address discrepancy. The XXXX XXXX accounts are settled. They have also been selling my credit report willy nilly without a permissible purpose listed on my account review inquiries without my consent. There are people who try to tell me they got my report because I got a homeowners ins quote, but I do n't own a home and they say I am not giving them the address that the quote was for. There are a few who just tell me they ca n't find any account for me. This is a blatant disregard for my privacy.
I have a loan with Peaks Private Student Loan and it has been charged off for sometime now however they keep re-aging the account and this practice is illegal. I filed a dispute with XXXX and all they did was verify that the account belonged to me. That was not what I was disputing. So I would like the account deleted from my file.
My  XXXX  account was hacked I spoke with  XXXX  and the refunded what they could on their end and emailed.  Letter instructing the bank on how to retrieve my money that was stolen and my financial information was compramised and I filed a dispute with. Huntington bank in the ban k mysteriously and the copy of the email from  XXXX  and the dispute was lost I still retain my copy of both then I had to refile on a different day then I was told after checking on it that only  XXXX  dollars would be refunded even though  XXXX  were stolen and that there was only a  90day windo w from the time it was reported well they never  went 80days ba ck because I went through the bank statements with the banker in my branch and sent them a total as well as phone banking reps I feel like this decision was made with prejudice and I am being discriminated against because the process and procedures were not folles as well as being refused and hung up on once I requested to speak with a compliance  officer  and I have that right several of my rights were violated and this is not faut
On  XXXX - XXXX -2017 I asked Hyundai Via their website portal to stop communicating by phone as their calls were so frequent as they became harassing and annoying.
On  XXXX - XXXX -2017 a payment for {$450.00} was mailed out via EXPRESS mail with Saturday delivery before noon to their overnight mailing address.
On  XXXX - XXXX -2017 Hyundai called again, but this time was early in the morning on Saturday morning.
This is a violation of the fair debt collections practices act.
PLEASE CONSIDER THIS MY NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE A SMALL CLAIMS LAWSUIT.
I was a victim of identity theft. I recently learned that my personal information was used to open an account at your company. I did not open or authorize this account, and I request that it be closed immediately. and to be remove from XXXX Please send me written confirmation that I am not responsible for charges on this account, and a police investigation is in progress take the appropriate action and remove my information about this account from my credit file. I File A Police Report and Capital One Wont Still Remove This Account And Investigaion was Filed againts Capital One XXXX 2017 and Capital One Denied The Investigaion and Claim that Some Voice Calls Match Mines and is False Statement and they are not going to Reinvestigate this account and that the charges will remain on my XXXX report.
my   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX   was declared a total loss after a hail storm on XX/XX/XXXX . My insurance company  XXXX  immediately sent a check in the amount of {$6800.00} dated  XX/XX/XXXX . I began calling Santander every few days to see if the balance had been applied to my loan so that we could move forward with getting GAP to pay the remainder of the loan. it was almost 3 weeks when I asked to speak with a manger worried the check had become lost. the manager assured me it can take some time to process and not too worry, i advised that my insurance company was also concerned and if much more time goes by they will consider stopping payment. A few days later the check was cashed, and I began asking them to please send GAP the forms needed to process the rest of the claim. Santander assured me they had already sent the needed documents and would refax them, all the while  XXXX  denies receiving them. Well a few days after the {$6800.00} was applied it was deducted from the account bringing the loan back to the full amount owed before the total loss. Santander assured me the payment was stopped on the check,   XXXX   proves it was not stopped.   XXXX    is now sending me nasty letters advising if they do n't get the info they need in 20 days they are closing my GAP claim. my loan is now 36 days past due and counting. My insurance company has spent numerous hours arguing with santander as well as myself. I have gotten no where, it 's ruining my credit, and now i 'm in a time crunch for my gap claim.
I had several issues with Upstate Services ( https : //upstateservices.net/ ). 

I returned several calls and voicemails on XX/XX/18 from them ( left both on my cell phone and on my work phone the prior week ) and requested a written validation of my debt, which I was told was a " waste of their time '' since I would not pay anyway. The company also called several family members and friends, stating to some of them they were making a final attempt on a complaint against me before turning it over to an attorney. The company also left a voicemail stating this in one instance. On a second call that day with the company, I asked for them to confirm the phone number of their company. The individual I spoke to refused because I had already called them back and had the number.
I recently discovered that your company ran an unauthorized report on me on XX/XX/2018 and XX/XX/2018. I did not authorize such an inquiry, I did not apply for credit or financing. and demand that you contact [ redit reporting agency ] immediately and have your inquiry deleted from my credit file. You do not have a permissible purpose to pull my credit report hence invaded my right to privacy and may subject to a fine. I will be filing on a claim in court should you willfully ignore my request.

Any applications you have received in my name is FRAUD. I did not give anyone my permission to use my personal info. Please show me the original application for credit or service bearing my actual signature, also show me any documentation giving your company permission to pull my credit file bearing my actual signature and not a computer-generated signature.

PLEASE REMOVE YOUR INQUIRIES WITHIN 10 DAYS OF THIS LETTER.
Hello, I checked my credit report and i found that GAP clothing store has closed my credit account with them with an amount of {$97.00}, while i haven't even received their credit card nor gotten any notifications about my credit. I tried to contact them but i didn't get a reply. My credit score was pushed back because of this and i hope i can get it fixed. 

Thanks, XXXX XXXX
I'm requesting that the following accounts be removed / blocked from my credit report, due to the fact that I DO NOT HAVE A CONTRACT with any of the following companies and according to the FCRA law these accounts shall be removed ... XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, and XXXX
ON XX/XX/XXXX WE WERE APPROVED FOR A LOAN THROUGH CAPITAL ONE AUTO FINANCE.The vehicle they financed had been involved in a rear end collision with 2 other vehicles.truck rear ended vehicle in front and the truck was hit from behind also. front end of truck sustained moderate damage.rear of truck minor damage to bumper. 

we come to find this out after having vehicle diagnosed for an engine problem and the truck needs a motor and is inoperable.computer diagnostics wereperformed and a thorough inspection performed.The mechanic who looked at truck found some hidden from plain sight issues and pointed them out.The after market exhaust system and fiberglass muffler were installed before the vehicle was sold to us.Mechanic said they sold you junk.It should have been reported on car fax.The car fax the dealer showed us was incomplete and missing information.The car fax I ordered XX/XX/XXXX reveals more information but does not specify extent of damage.We went to the clear vin website and ordered a report there which did gave less detailed information.i posted the truck onto XXXX XXXX and find auto check report containing clear concise damage information.car fax we ordered shows FUNCTIONAL DAMAGE REPORTED.MEANING TRUCK WAS NOT DRIVEABLE. 
the front end was busted up and quite likely why we are having problems not just with the engine, also going to use 4 wheel drive, wheel alignment- front end wheels could not be properly aligned odd.Maybe slightly bent control arm.steering wheel and driving vibration troubles.There are problems brought up when changing oil with having oil filter and oil pan problems noted. 
had the dealer been honest we would have not traded in my car or put money down nor would a lender have financed this vehicle.
I pay it on XX/XX/2017. But it still show on my credit report. They never toll me they will put it on.
Dear Consumer Advocate, I am writing to escalate an issue I am running into with XXXX XXXX. My account opened under XXXX originally and in 2013 this company merged with XXXX XXXX. As a customer, I have never been late with my payments. In fact, I worked diligently to keep all my accounts in order to carefully build my credit back up after a Chapter XXXX dismissal. I had numerous technical issues after the XXXX companies merged, including not being able to access my online account for which I contacted Customer Service three times to help with this issue that kept recurring. With XXXX ( now XXXX XXXX ) and all my other accounts, I have reminder notices setup so that I could diligently make sure my payments were sent on time, for which I relied on. I did not use this credit card much, but last year getting ready for my wedding, I missed my XX/XX/XXXX payment. I never received a notice, thus I realized I was late because I had a credit reporting alert setup, for which XXXX XXXX reported to. My balance was approximately {$40.00}. Again, I had never been late with this company before. I contacted their Customer Service department immediately and the agent I spoke with understood, was very concerned and added a dispute code. She mentioned it was likely they could remove it because she did acknowledge all the system errors they had. I paid my balance in full immediately. Since then I am refinancing my home, and also trying to keep my finances as low as possible and making the best decisions, I realized that entry is still on my credit report. I 've written a letter to XXXX XXXX and spoke with XXXX agents who say there is nothing they can do and keep repeating the same thing over and over. This does not seem fair considering my costs incurred to refinance because I did not get my reminder notice I duly relied on -- especially at that critical time in my life. There should be some exceptions! The cost does not match the action per se. I would think as a consumer, and having been a very good customer, they would have acknowledged their system glitches and helped me out. After the last letter I received from them this week, I called this morning again and spoke to a 'supervisor. ' She finally admitted they did not have any alerts set on my account. She was the first person to tell me this after the merge from XXXX and all the technical issues I had. She says I should have known to reset all my alerts! I am very frustrated because I have been working very hard to build my credit back up. I am hoping your organization will be able to assist me in some way. Please advise. 

Best Regards, XXXX XXXX XXXX
I ended cable services with XXXX and returned there equipment. When the collection agency called me I was informed that the charges were for non returned equipment. I returned the equipment to the XXXX store in XXXX Ca. I was told that they would investigate and return the call with an update. The next thing I received was a ding on my credit report.
loan amount {$35000.00} denied on XX/XX/XXXX I received an advertisement from XXXX XXXX to apply for a pre-approved {$35000.00}. When my credit was checked they said my loan was pre-approved. Because I am self-employed I provided 12 Months Bank Statements to support my income. I was told I was denied because my debt ratios are too high. This would be fine if the statement was true. 

The fact is that my Income for the year was met with very few debts as evidenced by my Bank Statements and remaining balance. The High Debt ratio is false and misleading. There is no system in place to appeal false information and in addition, this places me in a position where now I have an inquiry on my credit report. It is a frustrating waste of time and effort. 

I believe that lending criteria should be clearly stated so that a Consumer doesn't wast his or her time and inadvertently reduce their Credit Score by adding inquiries to it.
TODAYS DATE : XX/XX/XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX SOC SEC # XXXX DOB XX/XX/XXXX ADDRESS XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, FL XXXX ADVANCED COLLECTION BU XXXX ADVANCED COLLECTION BU XXXX Your company have violated FCRA 615 ( f ) ( 15 U.S.C. 1681m ( f ) ) ( f ) Prohibition on sale or transfer of debt caused by identity theft You have not responded to my request to provide me with an investigation report.

I need this resolve, under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, these disputed items may not appear on my credit report if they can not be supported by any evidence ( 1 ) In general No person ( company ) shall sell, transfer for consideration, or place for collection a debt that such person has been notified under section 1681c-2 of this title has resulted from identity theft. 
( 2 ) Applicability The prohibitions of this subsection shall apply to all persons collecting a debt described in paragraph ( 1 ) after the date of a notification under paragraph ( 1 ).

( 3 ) Rule of construction Nothing in this subsection shall be construed to prohibit -- ( A ) The repurchase of a debt in any case in which the assignee of the debt requires such repurchase because the debt has resulted from identity theft ; ( B ) the securitization of a debt or the pledging of a portfolio of debt as collateral in connection with a borrowing ; or ( C ) the transfer of debt as a result of a merger, acquisition, purchase and assumption transaction, or transfer of substantially all of the assets of an entity.

A person that furnishes information to any consumer reporting agency shall have in place reasonable procedures to respond to any notification that it receives from a consumer reporting agency under section 1681c-2 of this title relating to information resulting from identity theft, to prevent that person from refurnishing such blocked information. 
The reference items are listed below please take this matter very serious ADVANCED COLLECTION BU I have report your company to consumerfinance.gov As a form of record and I am prepare to sue your company Example In re XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX Telephone Consumer Protection Act Litigation, Case No. XXXX, in the U.S. District Court for the XXXX District of California Stop collection proceedings against me Signatures on applications and accounts Investigators report XXXX, XXXX XXXX SOC SEC # XXXX DOB XX/XX/XXXX ADDRESS XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, FL XXXX
XXXX XXXX XXXX, conducting business under the name " XXXX, '' included the following solicitation on the web site of XXXX XXXX XXXX " 3 Credit Scores ( Free ) - Get Your Credit 3 Bureau Score View Your Latest Credit Scores From All 3 Bureaus in Just 60 Seconds For {$0.00}! '' I believe that is an outright lie and fraud equivalent to what you alleged in the XXXX  and XXXX law suits. 

Copy of the relevant XXXX XXXX XXXX 's web page including the offending solicitation is included. 

In the late morning of XXXX XXXX, 2017, I went to the web site XXXX XXXX XXXX/ XXXX by clicking the link included in its solicitation on XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX web site. I filled out the application for the allegedly free credit scores. The first 2 pages of the application required my name, address, social security number, birth date, where I lived when receiving social security number, answers regarding history of my residences and personal credit, email address, and establishing a user name and password for XXXX XXXX XXXX/ XXXX. When the 3rd page of the application was presented to me, it requested authorization to charge my credit card for 2 items. The 1st was a payment of {$1.00} charge for an initial 7 day free trial of a subscription program that provided the " free '' Credit Scores, which charge would be refunded by a refund request made within 7 days of the application. The 2nd was the automatic long term enrollment in the subscription program for a monthly subscription fee of {$39.00} automatically charged against by credit card unless I telephoned XXXX XXXX XXXX/XXXX in advance to cancel the subscription. I did not include the my credit card information in the application, authorize XXXX XXXX XXXX/ XXXX to place a charge against a credit card of mine or submit the application to it. THIS IS NOT " FREE '' OR " {$0.00}. '' I contacted XXXX XXXX XXXX/XXXX and informed it of my experience, I considered its practices regarding the so-called " free '' offer to be false and illegal and requested it to remove my very sensitive information from its records, including any of its data bases. The person who took my call did not agree to do this, but did not state my information would be retained, and informed me by not submitting the application my very sensitive information would not be entered in its records. I believe this as far as I can throw the organization.
I made a check for {$70.00} to pay   XXXX   on  XXXX   XXXX ,  XXXX . I noticed on  XXXX   XXXX ,  XXXX  the check for {$5700.00} being paid from my account. The check was altered and made  Payable  to  XXXX   XXXX  along with amount of {$5700.00} and not the {$70.00}. I contacted the Bank of the West branch  manager   XXXX   XXXX  about the problem. He said he would handle it.   I was also the victim of another altered check at the same time period from another bank and I was credited for that amount in a couple of weeks. That other check was also altered and Made payable to  XXXX   XXXX  for {$5800.00} and I had made it to the city of long beach for {$500.00}.   I insisted with  XXXX   XXXX  my branch  manager  for months after and said he was checking on it ...  XXXX  of  XXXX  came and he informed me that the bank was not going to credit me
I sent money to other country ( XXXX ), my sister did get this money and was sent back western union of the united states again
XX/XX/XXXX On XX/XX/XXXX, I received a notice by email from American Express about a reduction to my credit limit. The reduction was from {$9500.00} to {$4500.00}. This left me approximately {$130.00} dollars of available credit. Since I never missed a payment or was ever late with my payments I thought there was some mistake. I thought this happened to those with payment issues only. I have been with AMEX for over 25 years and never had incident. I called them up and spoke to customer service. He informed me on XX/XX/XXXX my credit report from XXXX was reviewed and the score was XXXX. In checking XXXX rating scale this falls under good. Still he stated because there was revolving debt mostly from the personal financing of our business, they decided to reduce my credit by 50 %. He said making minimum payments was not sufficiently reducing the debt. Attached I have three statements for the last year since XX/XX/XXXX. My balance then was {$4900.00}. In XX/XX/XXXX a payment of {$400.00} dollars was made reducing the balance to {$4500.00}. By XX/XX/XXXX the balance was down to {$4200.00} respectively. The difference is approximately close to {$700.00} dollars. In addition, if minimum payments are an issue to AMEX then why have a card that allows them as most cards do. He went on to tell me I had options, one option was to make a {$2000.00} dollar  payment by XX/XX/XXXX. This would ensure restoration of the credit line. The second option was to send AMEX tax documents and bank statements to review for a possible appeal. If satisfied a decision could be made to restore my credit. At that point I felt something was not right. I knew credit reports are generally used for credit cards and supplying a credit card with such documentation without consulting someone was not a good idea. Especially, when there was no justifiable reason for such a drastic reduction or measure. I have never heard of such despicable and abusive behavior from a company. 
Though I have no problem supplying documents, I do believe this can lead to further abuse and unchallenged unfair practices from AMEX and others that follow in their steps. This in addition to the potential harm it can do to my credit file. I would like to know if this is considered normal practices from a credit card. According to your website this kind of transgression is not unusual for AMEX. It seems there are illegalities that they have been cited for. I would ask that your agency please follow-up on this situation. 

Thank You, XXXX XXXX
I have a {$24000.00} 6 % interest consolidation loan through Navient ( originally XXXX ) originating in XX/XX/2001. I have been making payment on this loan for 15 years ( less a few early periods of forbearance and an unemployment forbearance ). I logged in recently to see how much my remaining balance was and was shocked to see that I am after 15 years of payments listed as now owing Navient {$38000.00} in student loans. I have called and spoken with their customer service department asking how this can be the case on a 6 % loan I have been paying for 15 years on, they explained that during my forbearance periods interest was accrued and that for a time I was on an interest only repayment plan. My math still does not add up on how these amounts could lead to such a massive increase in the loan amount. I inquired on how we could get the loan paid in a timely fashion and the best offer they could give me was that I could pay $ XXXX/month for for 170 more months - which would be another {$55000.00} in addition to the 15 years of payment already made - which would be something like four times the amount of the original loan in total. 

I suspect something may have been added to my account or misfiled ( late fees, misapplied payments, etc ). Also, if I had been aware I would be accruing interest during forbearance or that I was paying an interest-only repayment plan ( and with that, if I was, how could I have been accruing interest as they claim ) I would never have agreed to those terms. I am turning to the CFPB as Navient appears unwilling to work with me on coming to a reasonable repayment of these loans. I would like to work out a reasonable and mutually acceptable repayment to get these loans resolved - I have been paying them for 15 years already.