WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
My complaint is regarding a recent dispute with my XXXX credit card with Barclay 's bank account ending XXXX the case number they provided me is XXXX purchase dated XX/XX/XXXX merchant XXXX XXXX dispute amount {$190.00} my complaint first off is i ain't Happy with how my dispute was handled the card company is going in the favor of the merchant because of them providing a tracking number that the item was recived how ever i never said the item was not received my disputed was for a different reason the item was damaged and was not new has described and i noted too the dispute represented on the phone that i did try too reach out too the seller and the seller was not responding back i understand the seller can contested this dispute how ever when this XXXX   tv was purchased from this seller on XXXX over the internet i never saw the merchandise intill it was delivered this seller has had many complaints from other customers of not receiveing merchandise or them sending items that are not working and not has described maybe XXXX or XXXX let fraudsters on there site but my credit card company is supposed to be there to protect my account information and when a purchase is made using my card online and if a seller is trying too committed possible fraud or not following through with services that are promise they need to take that serious the reason why i was not able too return item is the seller choosing too not respond too my messages and the thirty days too return the item of what was stated in there ad on XXXX  can't be done now all returns have too go threw XXXX and with the merchant not working with me in the first place and XXXX won't let the item be returned and me serious suspect potential fraud by the merchant and concerned whether my account information is truly protected against potential fraud when making purchases over the web or when a merchant on a site like XXXX or XXXX is there ripping people off i note this purchase was made on eBay but my credit card was process by XXXX but Barclay 's bank needs too handled this dispute seriously with it being made online and seriously listen too customers and this dispute needs too be resolved the right way
On XXXX XXXX I sent a letter to WAYPOINT RESOURCE GROUP XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX TX XXXX, I requested VALIDATION OF A DEBT they say is owed to them ... In response to my request they keep sending me bills which is not validtion of a debt. This is a third party collection agency I request they provide written documentation signed by me and them stating I the debt is mine and that I would pay the debt to them. Following below is the exact verbiage that was sent to them. Instead of sending me the signed documentation I asked for what I received was copies of bills which is not VALIDATION OF DEBT. I am requesting that WAYPOINT  cease all collections and remove themselves from all credit reporting agencies as I did not authorize the sell or use of my information for any purpose. Attached you will find verification of communication I sent to them also documentation they sent back to me. There is NO CONTRACT between me and this agency. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- This is to inform you that I've recently pulled my credit report and noticed that there's a collection from your agency on my credit report. I have never been notified of this collection. However, this letter does not imply that I refuse to pay this debt. Rather, I would like to dispute your claim. As per the FDCPA, I have the right to request a validation of this debt. I request you to prove that I am indeed the party who is by contract obligated to pay off this debt. I hope you are aware of the fact that reporting any invalidated information to major credit bureaus may constitute defamation of character, as negative listing on credit report does not allow me to enjoy the benefits of good credit. In addition, you must also be aware that until you validate this debt, you can neither continue collection activities nor report this information on my credit report. I'm sure your legal staff will agree that non-compliance with this request is likely to put your company in serious legal trouble with the Federal Trade Commission ( FTC ) and other state/federal agencies. Please attach copies of the following documents : 1 ) Agreement with your client that authorizes you to collect on this alleged debt. 2 ) Agreement that bears signature of the alleged debtor wherein he promises to pay the creditor. 3 ) Complete payment history on this account so as to prove that the debt amount you wish to collect is correct.
XX/XX/XXXX I applied for a XXXX loan online with XXXX, made 4 payments of XXXX and wrote them a letter stating that I was in hardship could we work on payoff amount and I would guarantee whatever I could afford to send at that time, no reply back, no emails, nothing. I have been receiving phone calls all week XX/XX/XXXX from a private number, on Friday they directly called my work and spoke with my boss who therefore pulled me into his office telling me they were serving me papers by XXXX XXXX. At this time I called the XXXX number they had listed the woman was very rude and then switched me to a XXXX XXXX who said if I paid them today they would cancel the the papers being served, of course embarassed that they had actually spoke with him. I gave them over the phone my debit card and paid XXXX towards this debt, they are telling me that I owe a total of XXXX??? I only took out the XXXX. Please advise as this was a third party ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) debt collector and needs to get a little bit of ethics on dealing with people who struggle and do have lives, I do not want to be disturbed at work or home as I have reached out to them in XX/XX/XXXX.
On XX/XX/XXXX I received a notification from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX stating that they were attempting to collect a debt on the behalf of XXXX XXXX in the amount of {$180.00} and that they would be willing to settle the account for {$170.00}. I found this letter to be alarming because I received a notice from XXXX stating that the same amount was due. 

This issue stemmed from this summer when I was supposed to have service installed at my new residence. Prior to the scheduled installation at the new residence, I cancelled the appointment with XXXX but XXXX failed to cancel the appointment and prematurely disconnected my service at my old address. As a result, I awoke to no television, internet, or phone service. It took XXXX hours to remedy the issue and as a result, they had to create a new account in order to restore my service. I was told that my prior account would be merged with this new account number for billing and statement purposes which clearly is n't the case. 

Ironically, I receive monthly statements for my active service and I pay my bill monthly. Until XX/XX/XXXX I  never received any notification from XXXX XXXX stating that there was an outstanding bill on the previous account and that failure to submit payment would result in collection actions being taken against me. I knew nothing of this debt. While I have no issue of paying this debt, I need XXXX to remove this from collections since it was an error on their part. I take my credit very seriously and this collection will hurt my credit score and has the potential of staying on my report. 

On XX/XX/XXXX I contacted XXXX and explained the situation to XXXX, id # XXXX who later transferred me to a woman who later transferred me to XXXX who refused to give his id #. I spoke withe supervisor, XXXX XXXX and I advised him of the collection notice and the fact that I was not pleased with XXXX. This is because I have an active account with a triple bundle package that I pay every month. Until Saturday, I never received a notice regarding an outstanding bill on my previous residence. I explained that I was under the impression the bill from my previous residence and my current bill were supposed to be merged. He stated that was not I explained my concern for my credit rating and I was told that this account with Convergent was an in-house collection agency and would not bear adversely on my credit report.
Please be advised, it has been over a year that i have tried to work with both credit bureaus Experian and XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to have an account that is reporting false and inaccurate information removed. I have called and wrote letters to all 3 companies and to date, like i said it has been over a year and the wrong information remain on both me and my wife credit. <P/>I am not sure who is at fault, the bureaus or the credit union, but XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX is reporting on my credit as a REPOSSESSION when i still have the car and have been driving it pretty much every day, making my payments on time without any slow pays or missed payments!!!! <P/>At this point, i have met with an attorney and will move forward with a steep law suit because this discrepancy has prevented me from securing a home loan for my family and I. My beautiful daughters should not have to suffer because of an error that has been caused by the bureaus or the credit union. I am requesting the account be removed or the payment history be corrected by XXXX XXXX, 2017!!!
<P/>I have awaited a year!!!
A public record pertaining to a bankruptcy filing is listed on my report. This record is inaccurate Inreached out to the XXXX XXXX of Georgia and they explained to me they did not verify this information with your agency. It is violating my rights as a consumer.
Discover credit needs to be investigated for fraud, and bait and switch practices. There is no {$0.00} fee charged each year, despite the attached online statement made by their company. Fees ARE indeed charged each year by Discover, they are exorbitant, and they continue to lie about it. This is a discriminatory practice, and it is unlawful. Discover should not be allowed to make this statement, as it is a lie. Discover does indeed pull a bait and switch on the consumer as a result of this front page statement, and continues to advertise incorrect information to an unsuspecting public. 
This continues the complaint I made about Discover Credit on XXXX XXXX, 2016 ; to date have received no reply from Discover to my complaint, and in fact, continue to be ignored by Discover Corporation regarding my email dated XX/XX/2016.This is a bait and switch complaint. It will continue to be this way until I receive a correct settlement of account for my credit card balance for Discover credit minus the yearly fees that their company supposedly does not charge. I need the corrected balance minus the exorbitant fees that I was charged was all that I requested. This request as per XXXX/XXXX/2016 continues to go ignored. Why?! I do need an itemized statement sent by US Mail, so I can settle this account. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. 

Sincerely, XXXX
Hi my name is XXXX XXXX XXXX, # I Got my CLARITY Services Inc, Credit Report for Year Back # there was So much = fraud & Theft, breach Contracts, for a lot of Accounts, I have Loss Financialy at the bottom I will show Amounts and Send Bank Docs by Thursday # The Clarity Services Inc, have Not Done a Good Job, theres so many almost all of report is wrong, fake bank accounts and fake phone numbers, Fake Emails, etc Names Wrong my ID SSN Wrong, this costed me $ $ Financialy Ok $ , I will Send All Paper Docs to you By Email Ok # Plus Bank Statements ok By # TRACKING # will be on Top Right Corner By #
American Express reported a collection account on my personal credit report even though the collection account is not my personal account. The borrower on the subject American Express account is a corporation which is " XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX '' and has a corporate tax id # of XXXX. Thus, this corporation, and not me individually, is the borrower. Because I am not personally the borrower the reporting information has no reason to reflect on my personal credit report ( My social security number is XXXX ). The corporation is the borrower, not me, and is a separate and distinct legal entity under Florida and Federal law. ( the corporation is a Florida corporation ). The account number that is being reported that belongs tot he corporation is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. For whatever reason the account number that is reflected on the attached statement is different but notice the amount that is stated on the credit report {$30000.00}, is the same exact amount as on the attached statement. It is in fact the same account.
On XX/XX/2018 I was served a summons to settle a debt. The summons was dated for XX/XX/2018 exactly a full month before I received any word of this summons. To top it off I was served on a Sunday when the courts are closed giving me no possibility to respond to the summons. I was not made aware of this summons in any way before the date to respond expired.
The lender does not disclose accurate account information in the collection of this debt. Paper statements and online account access does not clearly disclose how much interest is being charged to each student loan monthly. Furthermore, paper statements and online access do not show clearly show the application of how payments are applied, even when a borrower tenders payment application instructions. The lender advances payment due dates when additional payments are made beyond the IBR plan designated payment amounts. The concern is that when the payment due dates are advanced interest may be charged to the loan for the future due date period and then when the actual due date period comes interest is again charged to the loan for the actual period. A borrower would never know because the lender does not clearly disclose what interest is being charged, or how payments are applied ( pmt. to monthly interest vs capitalized interest vs principal vs fees ) on a monthly basis to each loan group. Therefore, a borrower can not understand the status of their loan in terms of growth or reduction, or have a real opportunity to identify discrepancies, and if needed dispute the accuracy of their account. 

Furthermore, if the lender holds several loans the loans are lumped together by loan type as one amount on the paper statements. This practice does not reflect the actual accounting of each loan and prevents borrowers from learning the actual amount owed and status of loans. Rather, the accounting practices of NMSL with borrowers who are on an income based repayment plan appear to be designed to minimize disclosure about individual loans, keep borrower 's in debt to collect as much as possible from them for as long as possible, and grow the debt as much as possible to allow for a bigger write off when loans are forgiven ; instead of allowing borrowers who are willing and barely able to make financial sacrifices beyond the mandated IBR repayment amount to make informed decisions that would allow them to actually pay off smaller loan amounts. 

In not disclosing a proper accounting of what is happening to the loans on a monthly basis and separating the loans by the actual loan amounts owed I am concerned this may be a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.
I cancelled XXXX XXXX summer of XXXX due to their system being unreliable. I paid the final bill which i have a copy of and also returned their equipment. 

They said if had to pay {$290.00} additional for cancelling the contract before end of term. I told them since they could not supply reliable stable service they had breached their contract. I told them i would pay the final bill of {$110.00} and return their equipment. Which it did. 

they turned me over to a collection agency which has been harassing me for several months now. They reported me to XXXX and they placed a derogatory item on my credit report. 

I asked XXXX to remove the item as I do not owe XXXX XXXX anything. XXXX owes me {$1000.00} rent for leaving their antenna on my roof which they have not removed after several written requests. 

I asked XXXX be required to remove the item and their collection agency be ordered to stop calling me. The agency is : AFNI, INC. 

Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX ( XXXX ) XXXX Account Number : XXXX I also want XXXX to pay me {$1000.00} rent for their equipment on my roof they have failed to remove. 

Best regards, XXXX XXXX
I had a car loan with XXXX XXXX XXXX, in XX/XX/XXXX the car was totaled and the insurance company was to pay the car in full, The insurance co forgot to mail the payment to XXXX causing additional fees. XXXX received the payment in XX/XX/XXXX.When the payment was applied to the account I did not receive a payoff letter on a bill showing the balance and no payment due. This has gone on for a few months until I called customer service to find out why I was still receiving a bill. I was told that the payoff balance was short and I explained how can that be when after the insurance company sent a a payment plus I sent an additional {$420.00} to close the account. For several months a tried to get this resolved, I was told by several customer service reps that XXXX  does n't mail out payoffs and that 's when i filed a complaint with the better business bureau. XXXX poor business practice has errouneously reported incorrect information to the credit bureau. My account should have been paid ahead until the issue was resolved. I filed a complaint with the credit bureau, my account was reporting 60 to 90 days late, XXXX being spiteful replied that the issue is resolved and now changed the account to 90 to 120 days late.
XXXX XXXX has continued to contact us after we told them that the person they were trying to contact was not at the number they were calling they called us XXXX times within one hour on a sunday XXXX we advised them if they continued to call we would file a complaint the names of the persons that called us were XXXX XXXX and the XXXX time the person was very hard to understand very poor english XXXX XXXX we believe
In XX/XX/2018 as I was preparing to sell my house, I was reviewing my payment history on Ditech Financial and noticed that they had made an error in XX/XX/2018 they posted my mortgage payment twice on, and then reversed the duplicated payment that was posted in error on XX/XX/XXXX and then they then reversed the payment a second time on XX/XX/XXXX, when I called to inquire about this the representative first told me they had re-applied the second one on XX/XX/XXXX and he sent me a PDF showing this payment was in fact re-applied, what I found very odd was that the principal balance I could see online and the principal balance of this PDF they sent me was exactly the same. I questioned him on the fact that the math on the PDF that was sent did not add up and that the principal balance was exactly the same as what I see online without the reapplied payment. If in fact they did reapply that payment then there would be a significant difference in the principal balance. I was then told that it was a programming issue and that the computer system shows different information online as to what they have in the system, I informed him that I am a computer engineer and what he is saying sounds very suspicious. I asked to speak with a supervisor who also argued with me about this imaginary reapplied payment. The PDF that was sent to me was only available to view for 45 mins then it was removed from the system. I have since sold my house and probably can't recover the money that they have shorted me, however I am extremely concerned that they are possibly doing the same to other consumers
Equifax is reporting an auto loan that was opened due to identity theft. The account is under my name and social. The account is from creditor XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XXXX ) with the balance of {$17000.00}. This account was opened after I experienced identity theft and I have provided a previous police report to dispute this matter.
I made a mortgage payment to M & T bank on XXXX/XXXX/15 on their online website. On the same day, I made another payment for our escrow shortgage on their online website. I received a confirmation number for XXXX transactions and made printouts of the same. Now I am told I am behind a mortgage payment because I made XXXX payments on the same day so it cancelled out XXXX! The funds were in my account on the day I paid it, I have the confirmation of it and I do n't feel I should now have to pay it. There is NOWHERE on their site that it mentions not being able to make more than XXXX payment a day! What can I do?
I sent a letter to XXXX XXXX XXXX and disputed the item with Experian on XX/XX/2018. I advised both parties that I have know knowledge of this debt. I went on to explain that the bill with the original creditor had been paid in full almost 3 years ago with no additional contact with the company to advise otherwise. I requested verification of this debt from both parties and to date I have received nothing. I am right in the middle of purchasing a home and need this removed from my credit file ASAP.
I received an email on XXXX XXXX 2016 from Discover Student Loans stating that they had not yet received my payment. I logged onto my banks website and saw that a payment of {$200.00} had been withdrawn from my account on XXXX XXXX at XXXX by Discover Student Loans. I then logged on to my DSL account and checked the payment history. My XX/XX/XXXX payment was marked {$200.00} and next to it was the word " paid ''. I went to the home screen and along of the top of the page was a banner that said my payment was past due. It also listed a minimum payment due of {$210.00}. I called DSL and talked to a CSR who informed me that my minimum payment due had changed in XX/XX/XXXX to {$200.00}. I told him that I had not received an email or any paperwork in the mail about this change. There was also no indication on the website that my minimum payment had changed. He responded that it had changed in XX/XX/XXXX, corrected himself and stated that the terms had changed in XX/XX/XXXX. He became very confused over whether the terms had changed in XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, or XX/XX/XXXX. He indicated that I should have received a message in my account inbox on the site about this change even if I did n't receive an email. I checked the inbox and there were no documents present. When I told him this, he stated that the documents must have " expired '' and that I no longer had any access to these documents, but that the terms had changed in XX/XX/XXXX. He corrected himself again, stating that it was actually changed in XX/XX/XXXX. He was unable to provide any documentation when they had changed or what they had been changed too. The CSR then stated that in order to bring my account current, I would need to pay {$6.00}. I questioned why if I only owed {$6.00}, the website had {$210.00} listed as the minimum payment due. I had paid {$200.00} on XX/XX/XXXX, in the payment history it was marked as paid, so it should only be {$6.00} due. The CSR said that was correct, but the website would n't show partial payments only total minimum payments. Going to the online bill page, the past due amount was listed as {$0.00}, despite being told I owed {$6.00}. 

1. I was never notified about a change in payment terms. 

2. Discover Student Loans was unable to provide any documentation that the terms had changed ( my previous months statements had " expired '' as well ). 

3. The CSR I was talking to on the phone was confused as to when the payment terms had changed. He stated it was in XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, and XX/XX/XXXX multiple times throughout the conversation. 

4. The site itself never stated how much I needed to pay to bring my account current.