WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
RESIDENTCOLLECT INC claims I broke lease by not providing " Intent to Vacate Notice '' and that I owe 2 months rent. I have document that proves I gave 30-Day Notice with copy of Military Orders. Document was signed by Property Management personnel on XXXX XXXX 2011. After finding out I was in collection, I called property manager and she agreed to remove account from collection which never happened. Collector did not accept my document and became abusive, used profanity and obscene language and threatened me with legal action. I am very frustrated because now the property management company at XXXX XXXX XXXX is no longer a business and the new property management company can not help me out. I feel that the burden of proof is on me and I have provided a document that shows that the property management office received and verified military orders in support of execution of my military clause and RESIDENTCOLLECT INC is undermining that. I feel this collection agency is abusive and is taking advantage of me as a consumer. I feel the document provided should have been sufficient to remove my account from collections immediately. What needs to be asked is what instrument ( s ) are using to claim I owe anything? You will find my document sufficient evidence to refute their baseless claim. They should be held liable as well for their rude and offensive behavior. Please have them provide any and all phone conversations they have had with me so that you can see how they have violated my rights as a consumer. this account needs to be removed from collections immediately.
Merchandise was not received. I submitted a dispute and got confirmation from XXXX that Bank of America has already issued a {$91.00} charge-back. Bank of Amer asked me, online, to provide additional Info, which I did. Meanwhile, no provisional credit was ever issued, and, in fact, no credit at all was issued. On XX/XX/XXXX, I called about the status of my dispute and inquired why, online, there is a message in my inbox advising that the dispute is resolved and was combined with another dispute ( which does not exist ). Incompetence and deception both.
I have filed multiple grievances with this organization, attempting to have this loan removed as I did not apply for it. 

At some point during XX/XX/XXXX my computer was compromised and accounts were opened in my name, linked to my checking account and emails compromised. An individual was acting on my behalf to obtain these loans. 

I tried to explain this to someone at Mobiloans, without any assistance. I was told that this was my debt, and that I was responsible for it. Furthermore, I would not have taken out a loan with such a high interest rate that is illegal in the state of California. 

As of XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, this is being reported unfairly and illegally on my credit report as a charged off account.
Comenity Bank failed to disclose that by applying for a line of credit with them they can pull other credit reporting agencies without disclosing a list of possible credit reporting agencies they will use. The CFPB has over 100 or more documented credit reporting agencies for 2017. As a consumer I was only aware of Comenity Bank pulling one of the three major credit reporting agencies to obtain a line of credit with them. However, they failed to disclose that they can access any of the 100s of Credit Reporting agencies available to them without disclosing this information to me as a consumer. I requested that they use my XXXX hard pull or remove it but they instead sent me a letter stating they tried to also pull my XXXX report which I have frozen with a security pin due to identity theft that recently happened to me. I requested they could access my XXXX with my security pin or remove the XXXX Hard pull due to failing to provide that they can pull any of the 100 available credit reporting agencies that are listed from the CFPB. Which to me is dishonest and doing business in bad faith. Why? Because a consumer is not aware of the fact that multiple inquires from up to 100 credit reporting agencies is accessible to Comenity bank to make a decision simply for a store card seems to be illegal in my opinion. How can Comenity Bank do this? Run multiple inquires, fail to list the credit reporting agencies they use since there are 100s of Credit reporting agencies based upon the CFPB lastest updates? How is this legal!
I had a savings, checking, auto insurance and investment accounts with USAA since XXXX. I cancelled my auto insurance policy and moved it to XXXX for a better rate. Despite the cancellation of my policy, USAA continued to attempt to debit my checking account for the USAA insurance. I sent documentation on 4 ( four ) occasions to prove that the policy had been cancelled-USAA refuses to correct their error and has now frozen my access to my banking accounts and my investment accounts. They also refuse to timely process any investment transactions I request. My last transaction was not only late in processing, but they also sold the wrong stock ( requested the sale of XXXX XXXX but XXXX XXXX XXXX was sold ) and they witheld extra fees. I have had a XXXX on file since the inception of my investment account, no change has been authorized by me since XX/XX/XXXX. In XX/XX/XXXX, more than {$320.00} in backup withholdings were held from a sale of stock ; my social security number has not changed and has not been questioned in prior sales. Currently, USAA is holding my accounts XXXX by blocking online access to my accounts. This is causing me much distress because I have no other means of accessing my accounts.
approximatley 3 yrs. ago my mortgage loan with Indymac was sold or transferred to ocwen debt collection-loan servicing company. it has been a consistant battle with them since then, regarding payments i send on time and then they will hold the payment till it 's considered late so they can collect late fees, then indicate they will foreclose on my home. i have documentation of the paper work they send re : this. i have documented all the phone calls of when, person 's name and id # & time of calls. i ask if it will be recorded. they say it is. i had to miss a payment in XXXX 2015. i called XXXX, told them it was just for XXXX, explained why, asked if it was ok and if there would be any penalties or issues of foreclosure. cust. service said a XXXX time XXXX month payment would not have any effect and my account was in good standing, and that it would be fine. so, i did not make XXXX payment. i made XXXX and XXXX 2015 payments on time and have been harrased by collections dept. @ ocwen, recieved paper work from them giving me options to short sell, give deed in lieu of and foreclosure. i call them about this and am told to disregard it because it is automatically sent by their system. then i am sent more paper work re : foreclosure issues. and they applied XXXX payment to XXXX and then they applied XXXX to XXXX. more foreclosure paper sent to me. i sent the funds required to them on XXXX XXXX and then XXXX XXXX 2015 to be caught up and they withheld paymenys till they were considered late again. this is my complaint.. i am very concerned they are sabotaging all the payments i send so they can foreclose on my house. indymac did this as well just before they gave my loan w/them to ocwen. i had to hire attourney 's to stop foreclosure then. please instruct me on how to get ocwen from doing what they are doing. Thank-you. Sincerely XXXX XXXX.
I was approved for the XXXX $ repayment based on income. Both my student loan companies are charging more interest than I believe should be charged. I am unemployed at this time. Navient is not looking to help and I had to go through the actually student financial government website to find the help that I need. Even with XXXX I had to do the same tjhing. I wish instead of putting people further behind when it comes to repayment they would help people.
Equifax recently was part of a cyber attack in which millions of people 's information was compromised. Only way to figure out if you were compromised is to visit a equifax website in which they try to sell you fraud protection. Should n't have to pay them for fraud protection when my information was compromised due to their security and no fault of my own.
There were student loans taken out in my name without my knowledge and a police report has been filed and sent to the companies
Wrong addresses and names or spellings of my name and variations on my address are making it inaccurate and violates FCRA that states it should be 100 % accurate. there are inquiries I do not recognize and original creditors can not locate my information. 

1. XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 2. XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 3. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 4. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 5. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ) 6. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 7. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 8. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 9. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) and Equifax is reporting 1. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 2. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 3. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 4. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 5. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ) 6. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ) 7. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ) 8. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 9. XXXX XXXX XXXX  ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 10. XXXX ( 1XX/XX/XXXX ) 11. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ) 12. XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 13. XXXX XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 14. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ) 15. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX ) 16. XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX )
I had an issue making my monthly car payment to PNC and I called them to make payment arrangements. I gave them a partial payment that day and the remaining portion was to be paid my next paycheck 2 weeks later. I was told that this would be ok. 3 days later my PNC account was overdrawn because they took the remaining part of the payment 7 days prior to the agreement. Now PNC is overdrafting my account {$35.00} every day.
In XX/XX/2018, I discovered that my personal information was used to open a business credit card and used to attempt to open a business loan at Navy Federal Credit Union by my former employer. I contacted Navy Federal to inform them that the account opened and the account attempted to be opened was not mine and they sent me the proper documents to dispute the account and the charges made. After I successfully completed all required documents and they completed their investigation, they still ruled that the fraudulent account was mine, which indeed it is not. I have a police report and FTC Fraud affidavit and I would like them to stop badgering me for an account that was clearly opened fraudulently and I have the proper documents to prove it.
I purchased a car from car max. My credit is not the best and I was prepared to pay a higher interest percentage. I am a widow with XXXX children working two jobs. I receive survivor benefits on a card provided to me by the SSA. My payment is 16 days late and I am receiving calls three times a day to collect payment. I tried to pay my payment and was informed they can't try to enter a payment from a pre paid card until it is 30 days late. after they report it to the credit bureau. I can't set up recurring payments off my pre paid card either. I was informed that upon entering my payment two different ways their system was not taking it and to avoid them reporting my non payment I could drive 45 min to the store every month and pay it or pay 12 to 20 dollars to go wire it from XXXX XXXX each month in my spare time and if these options didn't work for me I could bring the car to them and they would report voluntary repossession to the credit bureaus and sell my car at an auction and I would be responsible for the rest. I again tried to explain to them I did not have a problem paying my bill and I would be happy for them to deduct automatically. I was informed that because the options I was offered I should bring the car back and as a curtsey they would sell it at an auction and that would get me out of my payment. I was never informed in any way that unless I paid my payment exactly how they wanted me to they would not even attempt to take a different payment method until it was 30 days past due. I repeatedly asked to speak to a manager above the one I was speaking to and by the third person I had reached the top. I asked if there was some type of record I could have of our conversation and was informed she would file a written complaint to her boss. I was informed I could go refinance it somewhere that took prepaid cards because they didn't and that I had the reaming 14 days left on my statement to figure it out or it would be reported to the credit bureau.
A settlement was reached between U. S. Department of Justice and the Consumer Protection Bureau and Ally Bank for allegations of discrimination in auto financing. After notified of the lawsuit a few months later I received a letter from ally bank noting that I was to receive a credit on my loan and will be reflected on the following billing statements. The letter was dated XX/XX/XXXX. I have since called and found out that my payments were adjusted and instead of a decrease they increased from XXXX to XXXX. 
I have called and In fact the monthly payments did increase with no changes in length of total amount financed. Customer service states credit has been applied. I have the correspondence letters. Please send contact information of whom I should contact next. 
Thanks so much for your assistance. 
XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX
Experian deliberately discourages customers ability to submit online submission of request of correction in credit report errors by deliberately blocking access by issuing fake security questions and blacking online access. 

Experian has repeatedly blocked the last three attempts I have made to submit correction request via there online site. They ask obscure id verification questions which I still answer correctly and stull black access. They demand I send sensitive copies of personal id via mail which I will not do. XXXX and XXXX have no problems verifying my ID, this is a deliberate ploy by Experian to black access and is fraudulent.
On XX/XX/XXXX I viewed my Equifax credit report. In the inquiries section I noted duplicate inquiries for XXXX  XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX and also for XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX. I disputed these inquiries online with Equifax, but my results stated these inquiries are factual information. Perhaps it was misunderstood that I was not stating that I did not authorize these companies to pull my credit for that date, but rather I am stating that there should not have been duplicate pulls for the same date for these companies. I did not authorize any duplicates. There should only be one XXXX XXXX inquiry for XX/XX/XXXX and one from XXXX for XX/XX/XXXX.
I was approved online for a loan through  OneMain Financial  for {$12000.00}  XXXX  unsecured ) or {$15000.00}  (  secured by auto ) to purchase construction equipment for my personal use ( attachment 1 ). I later discussed the loan over the phone with  XXXX  employees who contacted me about the loan  XXXX   XXXX  and  XXXX  at bank phone  XXXX  ). I was told the financial institution did not make equipment loans, but that I could refinance  XXXX  of my cars and received {$9000.00} in addition to pay for the equipment. I told them I was not interested in their loan since it did not accomplish what I wanted and I felt the interest rate th ey quoted was too high. A few days later, I was notified online that my loan application had been denied ( attachment 2 ). An attachment to this denial was my credit report with several boxes checked indicating why I was " denied '' ( not attached due to personal information ).
M & T mortgage is billing me for things, increasing my payments then charging me late fees. M & T stated my home owner insurance lapsed due to lack of payment. My insurance agent stated it did not lapse. My payments are done thru escrow so it is paid by the mortgage company. If it was n't paid then they did n't pay it. My insurance agent says it was paid and never lapsed. I did change insurance providers thru my agent for a better rate and additional coverage. 
M & T charged me {$4300.00} for lack of insurance then did a partial refund of {$2900.00}. They have done escrow assessments every 2-3 months ( this seems excessive is n't that once a year? ) increasing my payments every 2-3 months so my auto payments are short. Then, M & T does n't apply my payments since it is not the full amount and holds it in " suspense balance '' then charges me a late fee of {$470.00}. 
I have called repeatedly to resolve this. I get a different person every time and I am bounced from department to department with no resolution after days and hours on the phone. 
I think M & T has questionable practices making money on this repeated escrow assessment increasing payments, billing me for insurance I have and charging late fees on the payment increases they incurred. And I can not get it resolved so I keep getting charged more. I need help with this. I would like M & T investigated for these practices and a refund. So far I do not believe I have been reported to the credit bureau but that is a concern as well ... that they will ruin my credit rating
I do not recognize this company and I do not owe them, remove this from my credit report..I already sent letters to the credit bureaus to no avail..CFPB step up and remove XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX
I have been a customer of Discover bank for almost 7 years and I have always been following their rules and made prompt payments. ( My credit score is excellent. ) Last month they sent me a short notice saying that my account will be closed, effective immediately. This was highly unanticipated since I never did anything wrong and it will greatly affect my credit history.
From my credit report from XXXX and XXXX there is credit inquiries that I did not make. XXXX XXXX  on XXXX XXXX saw XXXX as well. XXXX has inquiries from XXXX national credit Card Cos. Also XXXX XXXX. I did not make these inquiries. Please take them off
We paid for a concrete pour service from XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/18 ( which would not take place until XX/XX/18 ). On XX/XX/18, we canceled the service ( there was no cancellation clause in the contract, and it was timely cancellation since it would not have taken place until XX/XX/18 ). Then we didn't hear back from XXXX XXXX despite many calls and emails. 

Our credit card company XXXX XXXX PREFERRED credited this charge at first but then reversed it - asking us to support with other information which we did throughout these past 2 months. They have since closed the case despite these circumstances : 1 ) We never got the service we were charged for. ( another concrete vendor wrote a letter to XXXX in our defense saying the work was never done ) 2 ) We tried to cancel timely. ( see contract - no cancellation clause ) 3 ) XXXX XXXX is a fraudulent company ( see the recent XXXX complaints, XXXX station in XXXX will also do a story on them about them ripping people 's money ) 4 ) We have provided everything possible that they have requested. 

Citibanks investigation did not even ask for the cancelation clause, even though that is why they initially ruled in the merchants favor. If they had done a proper investigation none of this would have happened. Citibank employees have told me numerous times to submit documentation, the claim was open all to be told later by a senior supervisor XXXX XXXX XXXX that none of that is true and after XX/XX/XXXX deadline nothing else mattered. They are very incompetent and had they discussed how the dispute should have been filed ( cancellation vs no services received ) we also would not be in this situation. Citibank blamed the rules on Mastercard/Visa rules about timelines, but they were the ones that caused this because they did not properly investigate. I am happy to provide more explanation because this should be a very logical dispute that should have ruled in our favor. 

Somehow the merchant and the merchants bank stated services were done, obviously not true and why would Citibank just accept that was true??
Around XX/XX/2018, I applied for a XXXX XXXX XXXX Credit card at the XXXX XXXX XXXX 's location. The card was approved. 

About a week later I received a letter from XXXX 's communicating congratulations for opening a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. ( See attached letter ). 

However, I was stunned to learn that XXXX 's also applied for me to get a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX without my approval. 

This practice should not be permitted and I believe it's is not legal. As a result, my credit is damaged for being declined for a credit card I did not apply for.
I received a letter fro m Southern Finance i n  XXXX  stating that I owe  XXXX  for medical bills. I sent a money order for {$50.00} in  XXXX  so I could start paying toward the balance. I received a phone a rude call today from  XXXX  at  Southern Finance,  after I would n't respond to her rude phone call she hung up, and it resulted in me talking to her boss. He stated that I had balance of over  XXXX  and I could n't pay {$50.00} but I had to pay {$100.00}. I told him that a payment arrangement was not arrange so I started paying {$50.00} per month and he said well you need to pay {$100.00}. I repeated that I will only pay {$50.00} and he stated well I will sue you in court. I have also asked them not to call me but they can contact me via letter and they continue to call me.
I have been reported by TD Bank on XXXX XXXX,2015 and the information is inaccurate. I was offer an settlement offer on account ending # XXXX, in the amount of XXXX if paid by XXXX XXXX. I set-up XXXX payments to be withdrawn from an different account of {$37.00} which both payments has been satisfied by such date. I contacted TD Bank and explain to them that I was given an settlement to prevent further collections activity. I have spoken to several representatives regarding this matter and no resolution. I have been contacted by a manager and when I tried calling her back I have n't received a follow up called back from TD Bank. This account has been reported inaccurately. Please make necessary corrections. The account should be consider paid in full for the settlement amount I was offered {$74.00} ( +/- ). 

Also, I noticed on my report that account ending # XXXX has been reported for the incorrect amount owed at closing. The account was charged off with an outstanding balance owed {$450.00} ( +/- ) of which I have called the collections company to set-up payment arrangements. Please have amount corrected.