WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
i had bad credit reason child support outstanding {$5100.00}, XXXX phone bill outstanding {$1000.00}, XXXX credit card outstanding {$2000.00}, XXXX  electric bill outstanding {$2500.00} federal tax lien XXXXoutstanding balance $ XXXX XXXX  federal tax lien {$30000.00} my drivers licensed # XXXX still suspended in XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX dl # XXXX suspended nationwide santander consumer usa could not approved a retail installment sale contract no dealer number no contract number wrong address of buyer XXXX correct XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX md XXXX wrong name of seller XXXX if XXXX XXXX XXXX forfeited business licensed. contract federal truth-in-lending disclosures annual rate 17.07 % with credit score XXXX at XXXX years old. finance amount {$10000.00} vehicle price {$10000.00} vehicle amount finance {$19000.00} total of payments {$30000.00} total sale price {$33000.00} monthly {$410.00} beginning baby boy XXXX stolen at XXXX from southern maryland hospital in XXXX md on oXX/XX/XXXX1978 child is still missing invalid contract block print XXXX of XXXX XXXX XXXX no seller signature by no name or signature or title law form no. XXXX santander in default of {$19000.00}, pay off {$18000.00} conduct the fbi
Previously deleted student loans that were at a XXXX balance have had the original balance added back to them and reinserted into my credit report. This erroneous error has negatively affected my credit score and student loan balance. 
Account Type Previous Balance New Balance Reported By XXXX XXXX {$2500.00} {$2500.00} ( - {$25.00} ) XXXX XXXX XXXX {$3100.00} {$3100.00} ( - {$31.00} ) XXXX DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXX {$0.00} {$1100.00} ( + {$1100.00} ) Equifax DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXX {$0.00} {$6500.00} ( + {$6500.00} ) Equifax DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXX {$0.00} {$3500.00} ( + {$3500.00} ) Equifax DEPT OF ED/XXXX XXXX {$0.00} {$2500.00} ( + {$2500.00} ) Equifax XXXX XXXX {$3100.00} {$3100.00} ( + {$31.00} ) Equifax XXXX XXXX {$2500.00} {$2500.00} ( + {$25.00} ) Equifax
I have several collection accounts or student loan debt on my credit report from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Delaware XXXX. RE : XXXX -On behalf of XXXX XXXX. Please be advised that I 'm disputing these collections due to the fact that we have chosen to work directly with XXXX for lowering payments. I 'm disputing these collections due to the fact does not currently have a a valid license to collect debt in the State of Virginia according to the Virginia department of XXXX XXXX for verification. I am requesting that you delete these accounts from my credit file or provide me physical proof that they are licensed to collect debt in Virginia.
I have not lived with my parents for over 20 years and they called my father at his work. I have had so many letters and calls from these people over the years XXXX and I find it hard to deal with. The company Portfolio Recovery has 4 collections on me totaling almost {$2500.00}. In the past I have tried to call and they are not willing to work with any type of payment plan for someone on foodstamps with low income. I have no idea what companies or debts they represent. They fill up my credit report and make it hard to find a home, job, school loans.The continuous letters and harassment have led me to feel consumed with fear, worry and anxiety. I tried to buy a home recently and was crushed to find out my credit score. I am a person with XXXX and the hits on my credit and all the continuous harassment mail and calls XXXX.
XXXX/XXXX/2016 Bank of America credit card statement. As soon as monthly statement cut on XXXX/XXXX/2016, I electronically scheduled to pay the minimum payment as presented on statement. I did not know what the minimum payment would be until after the statement cut on XXXX/XXXX/2016. Bank of America applied this XXXX/XXXX/2016 payment ( posted XXXX/XXXX/2016 ) to the XXXX/XXXX/2016 statement even though they previously applied a XXXX/XXXX/2016 minimum payment to this statement and after the XXXX/XXXX/2016 statement was cut. Why would BofA apply a second minimum payment to a statement that had already been cut? Why tell me what the minimum payment is for next minimum due before they are ready to apply payment to appropriate statement??????? My conclusion - CEOs & CFOs lay awake at night scheming to rip off customers next day. This is a prime example. Even though they did credit late fee charge, now my new minimum payment due is {$45.00} " past due payment '' plus current {$44.00} for new payment due of {$89.00}. I have asked for a corrected statement to no avail, even though XXXX customer service reps including a supervisor told me one would be sent. Preposterous. And banks do not understand " lack of trust '' in financial institutions. I feel like the bank has committed fraud against me even though I had to talk to their fraud department to get the " late fee charge '' reversed. 

How can it be that BofA can tell me what the minimum payment is before BofA can apply an online payment for that minimum payment due?????????????????????????????????
Submitted an application to add my husband to my account as a designated joint owner because he is XXXX and have provided me with a durable power of attorney. I wanted too change an account and add his deposits to my account because his bank is in North Carolina. This would make it easier for me to manage the funds because the bank in NC only have branches in NC, OK, DE and other states not close to Virginia. The Power of Attorney was on file and has been used in the past, but not too add him to my account. According to Navy Federal 's website : Joint ownership is not the same as Navy Federal membership. Federal regulations permit anyone to be designated a joint owner ; but permit only those within Navy Federal Credit Union 's " field of membership '' to become members. Therefore, joint owners are not automatically Navy Federal members, and they may not vote, obtain loans or hold office unless they are also members. A joint owner is entitled to purchase and withdraw shares with or without the member 's consent and, if designated joint owner " with right of survivorship, '' would be entitled to the share balance at the time of the members death. The joint owner may also request information regarding the account at any time and authorize the transfer of any funds in the share account. I was not provided with an attorney to read the POA but XXXX who said she was not an attorney or a paralegal. She denied my request and told me she was the supervisor. I would have to write to the Office of General Counsel. The POA is valid and gives me the authority to handle financials transactions broadly from banking to real estate and other issues. I am concerned an administrative person was handling legal matters and our access to due process was inhibited without having an attorney to even review the POA before making the denial to add my husband to my account. Additionally, my husband is incapacitated and can not sign any documents but if he was able to go into the credit union and sign the transaction would have been granted. Therefore, be cause he is XXXX a simple request was denied.
I contacted account recovery services to pay a medical bill that had gone into collections. When I asked to pay the debt in full, I received a nasty response by XXXX XXXX. Instead of taking the payment and giving me a reference number she was very confrontational and would talk above me. I gave her my debit card information and asked when this modification would be revised on my credit report. She told me it would not change anything. I confronted her about her rudeness only to be told she had something I would never have, " a good credit report. '' This transaction took place on or around XX/XX/17 and have a bank statement as well as a recorded conversation when her behavior became escalative.
I was approved for an amex everyday credit card in XX/XX/2018. I was mislead by being told I would receive a welcome offer. Upon approval I was told that I would not by receiving the welcome offer and that I would be given a {$500.00} Credit limit to start and that I would have access to a higher line of credit after making my first five payments on time. The following is a copy and pasted email from American Express : Pay on time and increase your credit limit American Express logo Hello, XXXX XXXX XXXX Account ending in XXXX American Express Card View Account Make a Payment Manage Alerts Preferences You can earn a higher credit line on your new Amex EveryDay Card. Simply follow the steps below for each of your first five statements : Use your Card. You must have a balance due each month. 
Pay at least the minimum due on time each month. 


To help you pay on time you can set up automatic payments with AutoPay, where you can customize your payment amount and date. You can also enroll in Alerts informing you when your statement is ready and reminding you of your payment date.

Thank you for your Card Membership.

American Express Customer Care Contact Us | Privacy Statement | Add us to your address book Your Card Member information is included above to help you recognize this as a customer service e-mail from American Express. To learn more about e-mail security or report a suspicious e-mail, please visit us at americanexpress.com/phishing. We kindly ask you not to reply to this e-mail but instead contact us via customer service. 



Terms & Conditions 1. You will receive an increased credit limit if you ( a ) have an amount due on each of your first five billing statements, ( b ) pay at least the minimum amount due on those statements by the due date, ( c ) are not past due on the credit report we review at the time we evaluate the credit limit increase, ( d ) meet federal requirements for ability to pay, and ( e ) havent already received a credit limit increase.

2. Your credit line increase will go into effect by the end of the sixth month after your first payment. 



XX/XX/2018 American Express. All rights reserved. 



XXXX It has been over 8 months and I have not yet been given an increase in credit. The people that i speak to are very rude and are not concerned by the fact that I have been lied to. My credit score sits at XXXX with utilization around 20 % income over $ 70K/year with assets around $ 20K. I'm  not asking for a crazy amount of credit. I am just asking that they keep up their end of the bargain. They lied to me about the welcome offer and they are not telling me lies and even yelling at me, and hanging up on me when trying to explain the issue. I am so angry. I feel like I have been completely manipulated and it's unfair.
XXXX XXXX XXXX : Account was Paid in full and it was agreed to be deleted from the credit bureau upon full payment. It is still appearing on the credit and with a balance. Please correct.
I am a service member since XXXX and continue to be XXXX XXXX. I have XXXX capital one and XXXX card that where paid off and I have not used due to deployments and training. I atttempted to use a Capital One card in XXXX XXXX and the card was declined. I called Capital one and asked what was going on. All accounts where closed due to inactivity. I never recieved a notice or warning that these cards would be closed. I got upset and did close XXXX of the accounts and asked them to please open my cards again. Upon doing this I had a credit line of XXXX on XXXX of the cards but was given only XXXX limit. I think this company needs to let people know when they are going to just close your accounts especially when you are XXXX XXXX and potentially not able to use them for a period of time when you are XXXX for a year. My home address is correct my wife had power of attorney they could have contacted us via mail or phone before they did that. Now I have a lower credit limit than I was granted before the closure and a hard hit on my reports because I had to redo the same account they closed. I would appriciate the full credit line I initially was granted and Capital One knows I am military because they have been sent proof for lower interest rates while deployed and failed to give them however when contacted did fix the matter. I would like to know why I was not contacted about the closures becasue I would have had them stay open as we kept them with zero balance and had all XXXX ready in case of an emergancy while I was delpoyed or in the event of unforeseen expenses. Also I would like them to reopen the card I closed out of pure anger at the fact they would do this to me.
I had requested more information regarding the debt they were attempting to collect and was told due to HIIPA they could not release that information. After a couple of different contacts I finally received the information in the mail from one of the collectors. I called the Advantage group to let them know that I was disputing the medical charges due to my daughter having XXXX insurances and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX were at fault. I received a letter in the mail from the Advantage Group dated XXXX/XXXX/2016 stating that charges were confirmed and had been paid in full with the total equaling {$0.00}.
Equifax is still continuously reporting high incorrect balances and current balances are being changed from paid in full to high balance that is incorrect. I was never late on my XXXX account, and also you will see I have paid both accounts off in full. They do not allow the consumer to dispute online or via any way period. They are corrupt, along with XXXX, and XXXX. During the recent Government shut down, they especially took advantage of the down time, denying consumers access to reports, disputes, or any attempt period to have a fair credit report. I am trying to purchase a home for me and my family and they are purposefully at this point breaking the law by not allowing the consumer access to their own reports, along with no access to dispute incorrect information. This is how smart they are, you can't even pay to have access. LOL kind of defeats the purpose of being in business, or am I taking crazy pills here?
We are informing Bank of America, N.A. that attached letter Notice of Fraud and Intent to Litigate along with eight attachments has been sent via certified mail to their employees : XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX. We also sent the same documentation to their attorney XXXX XXXX. XXXX, XXXX. via certified mail as well.
this company keeps calling my home number asking for me. then ask for my personal information which i will not give out. they claim i owe a debt and i do not owe anyone or company anything. then they hang up in the middle of me talking which is very rude but yet continue to call my home when i have asked them to stop.
I contacted XXXX XXXX to report a debt that that was opened while I was a minor in XX/XX/2006. I explained to them that I do not recall ever having this debt and to send me information about the debt. They stated that they would not send me information about the debt and that I would have to fill out a police report.
My mortgage was transferred to another servicer and I was never notified. I went to make my monthly payment and my mortgage account no longer showed up. I called my previous servicer Bank of America and they informed me that my loan had been sold. They stated they mailed letters on XXXX XXXX. I contacted them on XXXX XXXX. I have not received any information from the new servicer either.
I asked Collection Consultants of California to stop reporting on a medical debt for 1 ) it violated HIPPA and 2 ) it was past the statute of limitations in California, which is four years, and they can not try to collect a debt that is beyond four years old. They have refused to do so and are still trying to collect the debt. Therefore, I am making another complaint against them. It is against the law to collect a debt that is beyond the statute of limitations and violates HIPPA.
This complaint is being filed because I have tried to reach out to experian telephonically and have been unable to get through to a live person. On XXXX XXXX I sent Experian a copy of my police report because I have been a victim of identity theft. In the cover page I included a list of the fraud accounts including the XXXX account # XXXX. For some reason all of the other accounts were removed but this one was not included. I have tried to reach by phone but can not get through to a representative to make them aware of this situation.
Our daughter XXXX six years ago and the bank has been trying to foreclose on her apartment for the last six years. The first foreclosure was dismissed due to fact they had used XXXX XXXX the robo-signing attorney to try to steal the apartment and could not produce the original note. We have maintained the property over the last six years. We are the heirs to our daughter 's Estate. The case was refiled and was at issue. We were never served by the court my wife and I. We located the attorney ad litem that was supposed to defend our interest XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX XXXX. He referred us to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Suite XXXX XXXX XXXX, FL XXXX XXXX where we met with both attorneys. XXXX told us he could not defend us and recommended his friend XXXX. We asked XXXX our attorney ad litem to inform the court that we wanted to defend or position as heirs of the estate and he refused. Instead XXXX insisted we needed to hire his friend XXXX to represent us. When we failed to give XXXX or XXXX the business due to lack of funds. It seems XXXX took retaliatory action against us and got the trial moved to an earlier date then the original docket stated and allowed the court to foreclose on the apartment in XXXX of 2015 for a XXXX sale date, knowing we wanted to defend our interest for the estate. XXXX XXXX also runs the XXXX XXXX XXXX out of his law offices and wanted to get the real estate sale business from this transaction. We are a XXXX year old retired couple with no home of our own living on social security. We are asking the CFBP to investigate this case stop the sale of the property and over-turn the foreclosure due to attorney mis-conduct and mis-representation. 
The bank claims it has been unable to contact us but has never tried. Wells Fargo has our phone number and email. We also met Wells Fargo legal team in court this month and they never reached out to make contact. It is not legal or fair lending practice to the Estate of XXXX XXXX that owns the mortgage to not have the right to bid on the property like the banks investor hedge fund did for {$460000.00}, when the property is worth {$250000.00} more. Essentially robbing the Estate of XXXX XXXX and its heirs and creditors of {$250000.00}.
I entered into an agreement with Wakefield associates at the XXXX Tennessee office for medical debt. The debt was around {$1200.00}. My monthly payment I was told had to be {$120.00} or they could not assist with arrangements. The amount was paid for several months until I became ill. I then called a Wakefield rep to see if it would ok to lessen my payment for a couple of months and then return the original {$120.00}. I was told that it would be fine as long as I did not stop paying all together. So for one month I paid {$50.00}, the following month I paid {$75.00} and last month I began paying the {$120.00}. 

Beginning from XXXX to XX/XX/XXXXI have received numerous calls at work, which my supervisor does not allow personal phone calls. There have been two men calling stating they represent Wakefield and associates. 

They have been ask not to call again, but as of Friday XX/XX/XXXX the calls and hangups are continuing. The calls are harassing because they either call my direct ext and directly hang up, purposely allow my phone to ring to voice mail and then hang up or their asking any coworker who answers the phone questions regarding my personal business. Recently I have been receiving calls after XXXX XXXX and sometimes before XXXX XXXX. In addition to that, they have taken some of my payments and most recently {$120.00} and are not properly crediting my account. But they are consistently harassing and trying to intimidate me as if they are not taking my cash payments. 

Since I 've been away, I have a temporary house sitter, who witnessed an unknown man and woman in a car. the man approached the mailbox as if he was trying to read the mail. I 'm very honest in my reporting of this incident and I ca n't prove that this was someone representing Wakefield and associates but I simply have a strong suspicion that it was. Especially since my house sitter said that he heard the woman in the car say " lets call the cops, we 'll get her XXXX ''. How is this deemed professional protocol.
Phone calls from Convergent Outsourcing XXXX. I have no debt does not concern me ... Calls my direct dial work number with an automated message.
These debts are noncollectable, they advised me they are beyond statute of limitations. These accounts with Hospital Collection Services are noncollectable according to them. They have ceased all collection activity but still call. Collection activity includes reporting the bureaus. Since this is no longer collectible or active, this account must be removed. All collection activity mustcease including reporting to the bureaus. If not I am entitled under the law to {$1000.00} perviolation. <P/>XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( 2 accounts ) these are medical collections as well I am reminding you of the HIPPA laws. It is a violation to report which doctor ive seen. The Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information ( Privacy Rule ) establishes, for the first time, a set of national standards for the protection of certain health information. The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services ( HHS ) issued the Privacy Rule to implement the requirement of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 ( HIPAA ) .1 The Privacy Rule standards address the use and disclosure of  individuals health informationcalled protected healthinformation by organizations subject to the Privacy Rule called covered entities, as wellas standards for individuals ' privacy rights to understand and control how their health information is used. Within HHS, the Office for Civil Rights ( OCR ) has responsibility for implementing and enforcing the Privacy Rule with respect to voluntary compliance activities and civil money penalties. A major goal of the Privacy Rule is to assure that individuals health information is properly protected while allowing the flow of health information needed to provide and promote high quality health care and to protect the public 's health and well being. The Rule strikes a balance that permits important uses of information, while protecting the privacy of people who seek care and healing. Given that the health care marketplace is diverse, the Rule is designed to be flexible and comprehensive to cover the variety of uses and disclosures that need to be addressed. This is a summary of key elements of the Privacy Rule and not a complete or comprehensive guide to compliance.
Entities regulated by the Rule are obligated to comply with all of its applicable requirements and should not rely on this summary as a source of legal information or advice. To make it easier for entities to review the complete requirements of the Rule, provisions of the Rule referenced in this summary are cited in the end notes. Visit our Privacy Rule section to view the entire Rule, and for other additional helpful information about how the Rule applies. In the event of a conflict between this summary and the Rule, the Rule governs.