WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
I had both personal and business bank accounts with Fifth Third Bank XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. The accounts were closed XXXX XXXX. In XXXX XXXX I began receiving phone calls to my business phone from XXXX XXXX threatening a law suit if I did not settle a past due balance with Fifth Third Bank in the amount of {$360.00}. This was the first notice I had received of the balance. Fifth Third Bank in 5 years had never tried to contact me concerning the supposed open balance. XXXX also called my wifes business phone threatening her with a law suit. At no time in the phone calls did they ever prompt me that " this was an effort to collect a debt ''. I would like to file complaints against both Fifth Third Bank and XXXX regarding this failure to comply with the Consumer Fair Credit Act.
I sent a letter to FedLoan Servicing in XXXX 2016 explaining that I would like all the extra payments I make to be applied to the principle balance of the loan, rather than to interest. I have just discovered that for the past 7 months, they have continued to apply my extra payments to interest, despite my wishes. They never sent me acknowledgement of receipt my request, yet when I call their XXXX number there is only a computer that responds. I feel I do not know how to contact them in order to apply my extra payments to my principle, which hurts me in the long run as it extends the payment period and increases the overall amount that I will be paying back.
To Whom It May Concern : Be advised this is not a refusal to pay, but a notice that your claim is disputed and validation is requested. Under the Fair Debt collection Practices Act ( FDCPA ), I have the right to request validation of the debt you say I owe FABCO. I am requesting proof that I am indeed the party you are asking to pay this debt, and there is some contractual obligation that is binding on me to pay this debt. 
This is NOT a request for " verification '' or proof of my mailing address, but a request for VALIDATION made pursuant to 15 USC 1692g Sec. 809 ( b ), 609 of the FDCPA. I respectfully requested that your offices provide me with competent evidence that I have any legal obligation to pay you. 
At this time I will also inform you that if your offices have or continue to report invalidated information to any of the XXXX major credit bureaus ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, this action might constitute fraud under both federal and state laws. Due to this fact, if any negative mark is found or continues to report on any of my credit reports by your company or the company you represent, I will not hesitate in bringing legal action against you and your client for the following : Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and Defamation of Character. 
I am sure your legal staff will agree that non-compliance with this request could put your company in serious legal trouble with the FTC and other state or federal agencies. 
If your offices are able to provide the proper documentation as requested in the following declaration, I have already made several requests require to investigate this information and during such time all collection activity must cease and desist. Also, during this validation period, if any action is taken which could be considered detrimental to any of my credit reports, I will consult with legal counsel for suit. This includes any listing of any information to a credit-reporting repository that could be inaccurate or invalidated. It has been past 30 days since my original request so this account must be deleted and completely removed from my credit file and a copy of such deletion request shall be sent to me immediately. The papers I revived did't show me anywhere the FABCO is a entity that is entitled to FORCE a claim against me based on OHIO XXXX XXXX Taking assignment of debts.
On XXXX XXXX 2017, I submitted a direct dispute to TransUnion via XXXX XXXX for a creditor that I did not recognize and have no relationship with. Through Direct Dispute, TransUnion acknowledged that the dispute was being investigated and that they normally respond within 30 Days. On XXXX XXXX 2017, I sent a certified mail letter to TransUnion at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, CA XXXX. This mail was returned to sender. I then made attempts to call TransUnion on the telephone at XXXX. I spoke with two people. The first lady told me the dispute was completed. When I told her that I had received no such confirmation, and that the current status in Direct Dispute on XXXX XXXX shows the status as currently under investigation, she told me they had emailed me the result. I asked her which email and she told me, the one on file used to open the dispute. However, as described herein, the dispute was opened on XXXX XXXX, and I have screenshots. I told her this many times, yet she kept telling me the dispute was closed. Eventually she changed her story and said the results were mailed to me, however I have seen no mail and the Direct Dispute center shows that the dispute is still under investigation. After trying to clarify the situation, and with proof that the Direct Dispute center shows an open dispute, the lady kept talking in circles about how the dispute was closed yet would not offer any proof or method for me to confirm this. At this point I asked for the manager. The manager again asked for my social security number, and verified my identity. I explained the previous information to him again, and that the status of the dispute shows currently under investigation. He again told me that they had emailed the information. Later he said it was mailed. Neither of them provided me any concrete evidence or method to verify the dispute was closed, and furthermore, the official Direct Dispute center which is a partnership between XXXX XXXX and TransUnion, shows that the dispute is still currently open 55 days after the initial dispute was confirmed. I would like to resolve this matter in as timely a manner as possible because according to Direct Dispute timeline they are in violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. Direct Dispute is an official partnership between both TransUnion and XXXX XXXX, so I see no reason for the story the two TransUnion representatives provided me with. I have use Direct Dispute prior and the results are always communicated through Direct Dispute, so the story I got from both TransUnion representatives does not make sense. I believe this warrants a thorough investigation of TransUnion business practices and how they are attempting to take advantage of consumers by lying about results of disputes. This is negatively impacting my credit and causing me financial harm. Thank you.
The collection agency somehow contacted my father in law on XX/XX/18 who has nothing to do with the credit card in collections. They told him i have a debt in the amount of {$1200.00} and gave him the reference number. Again he has nothing to do with this credit card account. They violated my rights by sharing information with another person.
I write Equifax a letter with my disputes in XXXX. It has been 60 days and they have not responded to me.
The past few months XXXX 2017 through current, I have made formal disputes regarding Navient inaccurately reporting a debt they claim I owe. I am disputing the debt amount. Navient claims that I owe a loan balance of roughly $ 220k, but they ca n't find the consolidation documents that XXXX XXXX sent to them nor the Master Promissory Note to justify the balance. Navient referred me to NSLDS to find loan amount details and to XXXX for the MPN that they should have on file. Well, I do n't trust the info on NSLDS because Navient is reporting this information to NSLDS and the credit bureaus without proper evidential support. Even so, when I look onto NSLDS and perform the calculations it seems as though some loans were be consolidated twice and some loans that were not paid through consolidation are also being included in the total debt amount. When I went over the debt calculations as reported on NSLDS with XXXX XXXX, supervisor of the ombudsman department, and the social media department, the debt they are claiming I owe includes debts that were already consolidated previously through XXXX and XXXX XXXX and debts that were paid off through other methods other than consolidation. The social media representative at Navient noticed this as we were on the phone calculating debt and said she would email XXXX to verify if the loans were paid through consolidation or not. I am positive that XXXX would not have this information because they told me since they transferred it over years ago, they did n't keep any information on file. Yet, Navient continues to report the inaccurate information on my credit file. I have also filed a formal complaint to the US Department of Education in which they just referred it back to Navient to complete and thereafter closed the case after Navient sent an inaccurate spreadsheet that does n't align with NSDLS. US Department of Education did not facilitate an investigation of their own, they merely reassign it back to Navient. Also, when I check XXXX, there was no MPN on file. Ultimately, I feel that Navient is not listening. I am getting nowhere with them. No resolution ... just aggravation. HELP
Prior to paying on my account with portfolio recovery associates, It was in agreement with the reps I spoke to that the account would be deleted after it was payed. I ended up paying the entire amount owed, and received a letter in the mail that it had been paid in full. After months of the debt still showing on my credit report as " paid, {$0.00} owed '' I contacted portfolio recovery associates to ask again for the item to be removed as that was our original agreement. At this time I was given the run-around, told to contact  XXXX  etc to have them delete it. I am currently trying to dispute the item to no avail. I had read that this is a regular occurance when dealing with this specific collection company.
As of  XXXX    XXXX    XXXX   XXXX  reported a 30 day delinquency on my credit report, which decreased my credit score by  XXXX  points. The company alleged I was delinquent on the account and made several attempts to contact me however to date I have not received a letter or phone call. In learning of the delinquency I immediately paid the card in full, as the balance was less than {$100.00}. I was advised I would be contacted within 48 hours by a manager to further discuss the situation, that was on  XXXX   XXXX  and no one has contacted me.     Up until this point I have never been late with any credit obligations, car, mortgage, student loans, credit cards, my credit has been perfect.     But do to this  one  incident I feel  XXXX   XXXX  has ruined the good credit I have maintained for over 20 years.
I was not aware that XXXX XXXX has me listed as an authorized user on this account. This account belongs to family member and I or the owner of account was not aware that I was listed on the account. I want the account removed from all three credit bureaus.
The medical debt incurred by Americollect was done while I had health insurance and placed them under a previous bankruptcy. When informing the representative of this and that my file needs to be rechecked they informed me that they did not care and that the debt was owed. I never received notice of the debt and it was never validated and I never received a bill period, it was just continuously put on my credit for the last four years back to back with change of dates.
Organizations that want to do business with the U.S. federal government, and their state and local agents, such as XXXX XXXX Community Development, must have a System for Award Management ( SAM ) number to apply for federal grants and/or contracts. Although acquiring a SAM number is free, the application process can be cumbersome. In addition to a taxpayer identification name and number, XXXX XXXX XXXX number, and IRS review, organizations must have a bank account and routing number. 

Last XX/XX/XXXX, I was completing a SAM application for XXXX XXXX, the community development arm of Metropolitan XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, when I decided to search low-cost offers for small business banking. When I checked online, PNC, which has a branch less than a mile away, popped up. 

Great news, I thought. The ad read : Earn up to {$300.00} [ 1 ]  when you open a qualifying PNC business checking account by XX/XX/18. Then I read the smaller print. Is your business located in zip code XXXX? If not, tell us the zip code where your business is located and well connect you with the offer available in your area : In the box below, I entered the XXXX and pressed Go to Offer. What message did I receive? Your business is located outside of PNCs servicing area. There are no offers available. '' An invitation for businesses in XXXX generated the same response when XXXX was identified as the location.The explanation in footnote [ 1 ] : Offer only available in select PNC Bank branch locations and only to businesses with an annual revenue less than {$5.00} million. 

" Outside the banks service area. '' What does that mean? What small businesses meet PNC 's criteria better than those in XXXX and XXXX? Both zip codes are in the heart of XXXX XXXX, and are populated with small businesses. Incidently, they are among the most racially and ethnically diverse areas in the city. 

Do households in XXXX and XXXX have sufficient incomes for PNC to accept deposits, but not sufficient not enough to do business with them? Not enough to ease the way for them to apply for federal grants and contracts? If PNC were the only bank in town, where would small businesses in those zip codes get bank accounts? 

Offended, I decided not to seek answers to those questions, but to do business elsewhere. Thank goodness for good and honest and community banking. Where PNC drew a red line, XXXX Bank rolled out the red carpet.
I had created a XXXX debit card which was recommended as an employee. It was linked to my bank account and the money I used was my own money. A week before I received my card in the mail I saw a charge for XXXX I brought this up to customer service and called XXXX to return my money and cancel my account. I was furious that this happened because it was a debit card which meant someone is taking my hard earned money to buy shoes not even in XXXX. They apoligzed and returned my money in 3-5 days. A week later it happened again over drafting my account I called XXXX again and they said that this transaction had to be processed three times and returned back again in 3-5 days they also said how they cancelled my card and have a new one for me when I explained to them I just did n't want an account with them because this should n't have happened. I also had to call my bank and get them to reverse the overdraft fee. I got the money back agian and then the following week they took out the money again over drafting my account again. I called them for the third time and they said they reversed the transaction again and it will return in 3-5 days hoping this was the last time I called my bank again to reverse the overdraft fee. After two weeks I get a call saying I owe a balance of XXXX for the shoes I bought I explained that I had already disputed with someone that I did n't make this purchase they looked through the records and said oh OK yeah I see that. We returned the money twice and I said actually three times you took my money three times and returned it three times. That 's when they claimed that they gave me an extra XXXX one from my bank and one from them and that I need to pay it. I looked at my account and did n't see any extra money and I refused to pay the balance something that should n't have even happened and caused me allot of problems with my bank. A full month of problems for a fraudulent charge on a debit card I did n't even recieve before this happened and inconsiderate reps that did n't follow my wishes to close the account just to keep me as a card holder.
We refianced our home mortgage in 2015, and the loan was sold Caliber Home Loans in XXXX, TX ( XXXX # XXXX ) for servicing. in XXXX, Caliber informed us there was insufficient money in our Escrow account to keep the monthly payment the same, and listed the new payment amount. They also included a smaller monthly payment amount if we sent them approx. {$300.00}. 
We wanted to keep the payments for our loan from increasing, so we sent the {$300.00} amount, PLUS the difference of the monthly increase XXXX. 
They returned the difference. I sent another check for them to keep our monthly loan payments the same, and they AGAIN returned the money, saying, by law, they had to return anything more than {$50.00} that was required by Escrow calculations. I explained that I did n't want them to add it to Escrow, but to keep the payments as they had been in 2015. 
They said they are unable to keep the payments fixed, even though I twice sent them monies which would do that very thing.
Dear Officer, I am writing to report that Bank of America cheated me over the phone. Please ask Bank of America to face the fact and explain why they should cheat its customers. Bank of America has never answered this question. Bank of America is still lying. That is not decent business behavior. Something is wrong within Bank of America because its phone representatives misled or cheated me. 
Thank you! 
XXXX XXXX PS : The following is the detail : On XXXX XXXX, 2016, I and XXXX XXXX XXXX in her XXXX office made a phone call to Bank of America ( XXXX ), regarding my home-line-equity account with Bank of America. Bank of America told me that my Home Equity Line account would be kept open and Bank of America would refund me the payoff fee if they receive any. 
XXXX XXXX ( Tel : XXXX ) would like to serve as the witness of this issue. 
Thank you! 
XXXX XXXX
I have put in disputes through the credit bureau, as well as, sent validation letters to XXXX Collections. This is a false debt that the company is trying to collect on. I did not recieve any response from XXXX Collections in response to the validate or delete letter I have sent. I have also have not received sufficient evidence from the credit bureau that they indeed had the creditor themselves validate or delete the false account.
I have an account with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX that was a signature loan that went into default because I missed 2 payments. I have brought the account current and I am making payments on the account. The account shows Collection/Chargeoff
I sent out a certified letter to XXXX requesting them to verify this account, I pulled the address from credit report from Experian. It came back to me because Experian must have the wrong address on my credit report. By law in which stuff like this protects the costumer XXXX had 30 days to verify. Since my letter to them game back to me dated XX/XX/2016 Experian has refused to remove this trade line that does not belong to me.
My previous complaint with Nationstar Mortgage was looked into deeper by the company regarding a sum held in a suspense account that was not applied to a payment, thus making every payment following that late. After the  XXXX  review, Nationstar admitted fault, stated they would go back and change the VOM, but have not yet completed this. The payment history was completed, but not the VOM.
I had contract with Honor Finance for a car that they financed ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ). Each and everyday, Honor Finance would call, text me then send an email to my employer 's email regarding payment. I have asked verbally, and have sent written notification for Honor Finance not to call or send emails to my job, but they continue to ( see attached ). About a week ago, I traded the XXXX XXXX. I spoke with XXXX XXXX and let him know that I no longer have the car and to contact XXXX. XXXX was furious and after a few words, abruptly hung up the phone on me. Calls and emails continue even as of this date XXXX XXXX, XXXX and I am stressed out and harassed by Honor Finance customer service and XXXX XXXX. I need for this to stop as it has elevated my XXXX XXXX. If you look at my emails from XXXX XXXX, XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX and XXXX XXXX, XXXX where I clearly state for Honor Finance not to send emails to my job, BUT, they continued to do so. XXXX XXXX always threatened to take the car and report a bad rating on my credit. He even told me that he was doing me a favor by letting me keep the car.
Beginning in XXXX of XXXX, I separated from my spouse and began the divorce process by moving my residence twice. On numerous occasions, I contacted Chase regarding both of these changes. Despite my efforts to have the bill sent to my new residences and / or e-mailed to me, Chase failed to follow through with this. I spent a great deal of time on the phone with Chase and many of our conversations became hostile. Because of this hostility, I firmly believe that I was intentionally targeted and one of my payments over the phone was not processed in retaliation. One month after my divorce was finalized, Chase reported a 30 day late on my account in XXXX XXXX. This was a complete slap in the face, especially because of the repetitive due diligence on my end to change two of my home addresses during the divorce process. I NEVER RECEIVED US MAIL CORRESPONDENCE BILLS AS REQUESTED DURING THIS TIME.
I 'm trying to drop my PMI insurance on an FHA loan. I currently owe {$34000.00} on the loan with the current value of the house at {$45000.00} leaving me with a ltv of 76.27 % the original value of the house was {$72000.00} leaving me with a value of 47.67 %.
today I got a call at XXXX, yesterday XXXX. on XXXX XXXX. On XXXX. On XXXX XXXX. I have more records showing they consistently call XXXX times a day. They also leave multiple messages on the same day- for example I had a message at XXXX and again at XXXX which is against FDCPA
While checking my personal credit report, I noticed an unauthorized and fraudulent credit inquiry made by XXXX on or about XX/XX/XXXX on Equifax. I did not authorized anyone employed by this company to make any inquiry and view my credit report. XXXX has violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act Section 1681b ( c ). They were not legally entitled to make this fraudulent inquiry. This is a serious breach of my privacy rights. 
I have requested that they mail me a copy of my signed authorization form that gave them the right to view my credit within five ( 5 ) business days so that I can verify its validity and advised them that if they can not provide me with proof that I authorized them to view my credit report then I am demanding that they contact the credit bureaus immediately and have them remove the unauthorized and fraudulent hard inquiry immediately. I also requested that they remove my personal information from their records. My Social Security # is XXXX and my Date of Birth is XXXX in case it is needed to locate the fraudulent inquiry in their system.
On the XXXX/XXXX/XXXX someone did a fraudulent wire transfer from my Business account at Chase Bank. The amount of the wire was {$40000.00} Chase bank approved the wire, debited my account and to this day XXXX/XXXX/XXXX they have not credited my account. 
The company the wire was sent to ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) does not exist. 
Chase Banks claims department has informed me that the claim has been denied.