WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
On X/X/2017, A new collection account appeared on my XXXX credit report. Reported by agency Diversified Consultants Inc. ( DCI ) in the amount of {$88.00}. Original Creditor was XXXX. I did have  an account with XXXX, but was paid in full when i closed the account and switched providers. I never received any bill, call, email or any notification that I still owed XXXX anything. On XXXX/XXXX/XXXX, I contacted DCI by telephone and was informed that I owed for an unpaid amount. I asked why I was never notified of this debt by either agency, and was informed they didnt know, and that I should have definitely been billed or contacted. I was also informed that XXXX had given DCI the contact phone number I had originally provided when I signed up for their services, which has not changed, so I know that had they wanted to, they could have easily contacted me. Had I known they wanted more money, Id likely have paid them immediately as I have been working on my credit. No attempts in any format were made by XXXX or DCI to contact me and inform me of any outstanding balance. My phone number has not changed, and I am rather easy to contact. Fair notice was not given to me by either company before this mark was added to my credit report.
I have repeatedly disputed account information with Equifax and they have never shown me any verifying information to confirm account status. Online collections account is reporting negatively on my credit file.
To Whom It May Concern, In my attempts to pay off my loans with Navient early, they will not allow me to view my repayment allocation for the the years XXXX. My monthly repayment minimum was also reduced to extend my repayment timeframe even after purposeful extra payments to reduce it. Thank you for your time.
I closed on my loan last year and escrowed for taxes and insurance- I have repeatedly submitted a copy of my HUD 1 and Initial Escrow Account Disclosure statement which clearly identifies that my account was set up with escrows for both taxes and insurance. I had to submit the documentation several times and Ocwen refuses to acknowledge that I am escrowing for insurance as well as taxes.
I co-signed a loan with my son in XXXX. He missed two payments earlier this year, but called and resolved the issue before the end of XXXX. He called them as soon as it became an issue and was told that they would work with him. While he did resolve the issue prior to XXXX, the company reflected a delinquency for XXXX on both my and my son 's credit reports. I am currently in the process of building a home, and the delinquency dropped my credit score by more than 110 points, jeopardizing my loan with the  mortgage company, and I am now in danger of losing the home that I have been building for the past six months. I am scheduled to close on my home in XXXX, and if the negative information is not removed from my credit report only ( not my son 's ), I am in danger of losing my home. 

The effects of this action on my credit score have been dire. I track my scores regularly, and when I checked them on XXXX XXXX and they were XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and XXXX ( XXXX XXXX. When the mortgage company pulled my report on XXXX XXXX the scores had dropped to XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX respectively. As you can imagine, my mortgage company was concerned. This is the ONLY issue on my credit report that has caused my scores to drop, and it seems extreme. 

Following are some relevant facts about the loan : 1.  The car being financed is XXXX car with a value of about {$5000.00} that was purchased used. 
2. My son took out the loan in XXXX, XXXX and XXXX was the ONLY month when he had late payments reported. 
3. He only owes {$1800.00} on the car. 
4. The account is now in good standing. 
5. This is the only thing keeping me from being able to close on my home. 

While I understand that co-signing on a loan does imply certain consequences, I feel like this particular consequence would be a bit unjust considering the circumstances. I did not act irresponsibly with this account, I did not personally miss any payments, and the account -- which I would have been responsible for paying if it had gone into default -- has been brought current. 

I called the bank on XXXX/XXXX/XXXX and discussed the situation with four different customer services agents and a member of the Executive Review Team, and while every one I have spoken to has sympathized with my situation, said that they have no problems with the account as of now, and agreed that the negative information was not a fair representation of my credit worthiness, they said they did not have the proper authority to remove that information from my account. I feel that someone at that organization should be able to remove this information, given the relative minor nature of the offense, the fact that I did not commit it, and the fact that the delinquency is no longer an issue. My son called the company today to try to refinance the loan in his own name and they declined to do so.
Our firm represents XXXX XXXX, 21-year owner of the property sold on XXXX XXXX, 2015 via trustee 's sale. We believe that sale is invalid, and in violation of RESPA. We are asking the CFPB to contact the servicer, Ocwen. A third-party purchaser issued the consumer a five-day notice to vacate, so we are immediately seeking to have Ocwen rescind the sale, on the grounds that it is invalid. 
XXXX XXXX is XXXX was XXXX in active loss mitigation, yet Ocwen foreclosed. Ocwen entered a trial payment plan with XXXX XXXX in XXXX 2015. Attached is a statement which makes note of the establishment of a TPP. We have payment stubs that evidence the consumer was performing under the Plan ; payment receipts for the months of XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX 2015. 
Ocwen neither denied a permanent modification, nor granted XXXX. It issued nothing in writing to the consumer, and consumer continued to perform under the TPP. 
Despite a live loss mitigation that includes a TPP, Ocwen foreclosed on the consumer 's property. The Trustee executed its sale on XXXX XXXX, 2015 selling the home to a third party. The Notice of Trustee 's Sale is attached. ( The sale executed on XXXX XXXX although you may notice that the original Notice of Sale schedules it for XXXX/XXXX/2015 because Arizona law allows foreclosures to proceed any time thereafter without rescheduling/fresh notification ). 
We believe the sale was prohibited by the federal regulations that place a moratorium on foreclosure during loss mitigation. During a Trial Payment Plan, that moratorium is absolute : no trustee sale may be executed during performance under a trial payment plan. Specifically, a servicer may not conduct a foreclosure sale if a borrower is performing pursuant to the terms of an agreement on a loss mitigation option. XXXX C.F.R. XXXX ( j ). 
If Ocwen alleges that it denied a permanent modification, we point out that we have no written notice of denial as required under the regulations, and notwithstanding any denial, the timing itself of the sale may have violated other provisions of RESPA. A borrower whose complete loss mitigation application results in a denial for any loan modification also has a right to appeal the denial if the servicer received the complete loss mitigation application 90 days or more before a foreclosure sale or before the date for a foreclosure sale is set. 
Immediate action is required in order to limit liability and an independent action for damages, which our research indicates may be appropriate under these facts. We are requesting the rescission of the sale.
Were writing requesting your assistance in disputing fraud billing from Specialized Loan Servicing LLC for a property which is not owned by us as it has changed ownership under a court ordered Receivership on XX/XX/XXXX The property in question is XXXX XXXX XXXX located in XXXX, Massachusetts. This property was surrendered under Chapter XXXX bankruptcy on XX/XX/XXXX and since then, no payments were made on the previous outstanding mortgage. Please be informed that since XX/XX/XXXX through XX/XX/XXXX the mortgage on this property has been sold numerous times to different lending institutions. SLS claims that we still owe them {$150000.00} and refuse to acknowledge that the property was sold to XXXX XXXX on XX/XX/XXXX under a receivership sale approved by the Housing Court/Commonwealth of Massachusetts. As the property was surrendered under bankruptcy and subsequently was sold by the courts, SLS should cease all billing and correspondence to us.
TransUnion did not address my issue and claims they ca n't find the collection that is as clear as day on my credit report. This collection has been handled directly with the creditor and was removed from XXXX, however, TransUnion is still showing it on their credit report. It needs to be removed completely not showed as a " paid '' collection. I used Divorce paperwork from court to show that this debt was not mine and XXXX XXXX XXXX cleared the debt and had it removed completely from my credit as a collection. TransUnion is still showing it as a collection for some reason.
A vehicle loan were established with Wells Fargo Dealer Services ; XXXX XXXX, XXXX - total Loan Amount : $ XXXXXXXXXXXX/APR ( 60 ) Months @ $ XXXXmonth payments. Consumer purchased a ( used ) XXXX vehicle. Consumer understood from car dealer ; a warranty purchase would be added to loan. Car dealer failed to add the XXXX warranty as promised. During XXXX XXXX through XXXX XXXX ; the vehicle were inoperable ; Consumer paid {$15000.00} ( out of pocket ) for car repairs within ( 1 ) year ; vehicle remains under repairs. Wells Fargo Dealer Services ; had been advised ref ; vehicle mechanical issues and problems with vehicle. -- Consumer had requested WFDS follow through with a deferment payment plan and make a resolution to the consumer ; regarding a dispute and investigation into the car dealer 's lack of transparency to the warranty purchase. 
Consumer made monthly payments ; XXXX XXXX through XXXX XXXX. Consumer advised WFDS ref ; the overwhelming out of pockets costs to repair the vehicle ; and that Consumer would be considering a lawsuit against the car dealer ; for deceptive practices and the errors and omissions ref the loan. 
Consumer contends WFDS has ingnored the hardship and failed to work with the consumer on said loan amount ( s ), payment ( s ), and deferment ( s ) as requested ; in order to accommodate out of pockets expenses/costs for said vehicle. Consumer has ( documents ) on file regarding mechanical repairs : {$13000.00} + {$3000.00} loan payments = {$16000.00} paid in XXXX by the consumer. WFDS were aware of the issues and financial hardship. WFDS has neglected to work with consumer and has made numerous excuses as to the agreement and/or advisement made by consumer. 
In XXXX XXXX ; WFDS charged-off the loan with interest against consumer. WFDS did n't provide adequate notice nor written memorandum, nor advised consumer of options and/or consequences. WFDS has canceled and terminated loan payments and has requested consumer to make payment in full for the remaining balance in the amount of {$10000.00}
Trans Union will  not remove old accounts. Collection accounts that have been paid and show  XXXX  balance are still showing up.   Old accounts showing closed are still showing up and they claim anything reported to them will stay on the account, even with proof that they are closed or paid in full.
I keep receiving calls stating that I have a case filed against me by a company that says they are arbitrators and are a nutral party. They called and provided the last four of social. They provided a fictious case number XXXX stating that I need to be present at an old address between XXXX and XXXX XXXX  every day to be servied papers. This was settled in bankruptsy approximately 9 years ago. I am advised to call XXXX and advised to give personal information which I will not do. They keep saying that I have a claim filed against me. Which I know I do not. Case number have letters or the county in them as to where the court case is being handled. These indentifying numbers are never provided in their fake case number.
I am have problem with my mortgage company ( Green Tree Servicing later became Ditech ) giving options to save parents home, which happens to be my primary residence. To give a short background of the situation, after both my parents passed away I relocated from XXXX to XXXX and when I got behind on the payments I asked for a loan modification and was asked to probate my Mother will and get the Deed in my name. I was turned down for the first loan modification and I was told I did n't get the deed in on time so I was turned down a second time. After this, I got lawyer so they could help me get a loan modification and we were both told the way they could help me was me that if I bring the loan current I could assume the loan, so after that a few weeks I was asked to send in all the paper work again for a third loan modification ( with the deed and the dates of past 2 loan modification that I applied for ) and was still turned down, because I may now own the property, but I am not on the original loan ( even after I turned in all the paperwork after my XXXX passed that I was financially responsible for the loan ). The issue started back in XXXX XXXX, and the three attempts for modification was 2 in XXXX and one XXXX which they told me to apply for.
To Whom It May Concern : I have noticed that you have placed an inquiry on my XXXX & XXXX  credit file dated XXXX & XXXX/XXXX/XXXX. As you probably know, Credit Reporting Agencies treat inquiries as a statement of fact and will not allow a consumer to dispute them. Since it is against federal law ( Fair Credit Reporting Act15 USC 1681n ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ) for an entity to view a customers credit report without a permissible purpose, I am writing to inquire as to your alleged purpose for doing so since I did not apply or request credit from your organization. Based on the evidence in my possession, this inquiry was performed under false pretenses as described in the clear language of the law. 15 USC 1681n ( a ) ( 1 ) ( B ) states, in part, in the case of liability of a natural person for obtaining a consumer report under false pretenses or knowingly without a permissible purpose, actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure or {$1000.00}, whichever is greater.This is informing you that this was a fraudulent application and I did not authorize your company to pull my report. I do hope that we can settle this matter amicably. Please remove this hard inquiry from my credit report upon receipt of this complaint to avoid further damage to my credit. Your immediate attention is appreciated in regards to this matter.
I rented an apartment XX/XX/XXXX with a friend. I moved out of the apartment in XX/XX/XXXX. However, my friend stayed in the apartment. I went to the main office and requested my name to be removed from the lease, I was told that everything will be OK and my name was would be removed. I later found out that my friend was behind on the rent and my name was still on the lease. Since I 've already moved out of the apartment and requested my name to be removed from the lease I am not entitled to this amount. I would like to get it removed from my credit score because it is affecting me. I am not able to get a loan for a mortgage, and buy a house for me and my family.
I believe I have XXXX loans from XXXX Colleges and would like to know if they were included in the CFPB settlement.
On XX/XX/2014 XXXX sent me a letter stating : Dear estate of ( my name ). The letter did not give me my mini-miranda rights nor did their letter state they they were a debt collector. 

I disputed the debt in a letter dated XX/XX/2014 and requested that they conduct an investigation and to send me the results. 

On XX/XX/2014 I received another collection letter from them with out receiving results of the investigation of my dispute on the alleged debt. The collection letter attempted to collect {$12000.00} and then it also stated to me : " You personally are not required to pay any of the debts from the estate. '' What estate if I am still alive and the the letter was sent addressed to me! 

XXXX Violated the FDCPA and the Texas Finance Code.
I have made multiple attempts to submit my income verification information to Navient over a period of three months. Each time I submit my information I receive confirmation that the materials have been received then vague communication if any stating items are missing but not outlining what is missing. After submitting several documents outlining my gross pay, I called Navient on three occasions to verify that they did in fact have what they needed to verify my income. Each time I was told I need one more thing then I was told that it would be expedited in 1-2 business days to keep my payment from tripling and consuming almost half of my income which I can not afford. I confirmed receipt of needed information with nothing outstanding only to receive notification that items were missing again two weeks later. This is delaying my payment calculation and I feel it's intentional as I fight with Navient every single year. They claim XXXX XXXX XXXX is not a valid site to verify income yet they have it listed on their site and it is widely used by many employers. I have taken the necessary steps multiple times, and have no clue how my payments are being applied as my total balance only increases despite never missing a payment. I want to leave Navient and their crooked business practices.
We are in a Hurricane Irma FEMA designated area ( XXXX Florida- XXXX , FL vicinity ). 

We applied for a {$110.00} deferred minimum payment grace period on our XXXX credit card ending in -XXXX. 

We have not received the {$110.00} payment deferment as promised for XX/XX/XXXX that is due by Monday, XX/XX/XXXXper XXXX Irma Relief at XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

XXXX XXXX
There was an amount showing up as unpaid that the company agreed was paid last year and per our agreed upon monthly amounts. They could not see why / how it got reported as an issue and were contacting the Bureau immediately for resolution.
XX/XX/XXXX- $ XXXX-unathorized charges XX/XX/XXXX- $ XXXX-paid in full not removed from credit report XX/XX/XXXX- $ XXXX-unauthorized charges and will not contact me XX/XX/XXXX- $ XXXX- not my account/fraud activity XX/XX/XXXX- $ XXXX- not my account, I had another one and paid in full XX/XX/XXXX- $ XXXX- paid in full and not removed from credit report XX/XX/XXXX- {$880.00} account was in a plan and paid from bank draft every month until paid balance down and it showed that I was late 30-60 days and was not
X/XX/2017    sent a  XXXX  letter asking that they provide me physical proof of how they verified an account when I received an email from the actually company stated she cant find me in her systems. Yet TransUnion is saying they verified accounts belong to me. They didnt not investigate anything. I would like these items removed immediately.
I receive at least XXXX call per day at work. XXXX of my coworkers informed me that they have called them on their personal cell phones trying to force them to provide an alternate number for me.
I was contacted by XXXX XXXX at CBE Group. He would not identify why he was calling, or who he was, until after I confirmed my address. 

I have a bill that is in dispute with XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. I believe I am being wrongfully charged for an uneccessay procedure. I have contested this bill in writing and have requested more information about why I am being charged. XXXX XXXX has not yet responded to my letter. 

In my letter, I state that this bill is in dispute and I am not to be contacted by creditors. Moreover, I state that if they report this on my credit, it is to be listed as " disputed. '' This is obviously being ignored, as creditors are calling me repeatedly and have even attempted to contact my father at on old number of mine.
I, XXXX DOB XX/XX/XXXX SS # XXXX contacted all XXXX credit bureaus XXXX, Experian and XXXX about some information on my credit file. I was advised to contact XXXX about an acct I never initiated or knew about until a family member advised me they put me on their acct as an authorized user. I contacted XXXX and had myself removed from the acct and was advised none of this would affect my credit. Then after checking my credit I saw this info on my credit report and it has harmed my credit and affected my score as if I did something wrong. I should not be punished for something I did not do or had no knowledge of until after it was done. My grandmother XXXX initiated these XXXX accounts with my niece on XX/XX/XXXX with {$3000.00} limits. Hence, me being her Power of Attorney she asked for me to be on there but I told her after she done this her actions would affect my mortgage closing and now my credit is shot to ruins. Somehow XXXX used information already known about me as I am a cardholder to associate me and thus used my social security number on this to be reported to the credit bureaus. My credit is now down some XXXX points. I asked the credit bureaus to remove this because I did not initiate these accounts but only to be told to contact the creditor. The credit card says contact the bureaus so I am in a bubble here with no help. I desire to have these accounts removed from my credit file immediately.
I had faxed my report request To Clarity Services to obtain my report by fax and they have not responded.
Credit inquires was removed and then inserted back onto my transunion credit report and I was n't notified.
I was cheated by BB & T and the XXXX could not handle the case and I am asking your help. I had a previous case ( XXXX ) opened and was asked to open another case with updated information. 
My first savings account was from XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank opened in 1996. The bank was taken over by BB & T. I decided to let go of my high pay job and went to XXXX. I wanted to close my savings account and I had plenty of Money in the checking account. The teller at a XXXX Branch told me not to close the savings account because if I had sufficient fund in the checking account there will not be any fees. I did not have that in writing, because I was banking with BB & T for many years. After XXXX months I found out that there is a monthly service charge of {$7.00} on a dormant account. I questioned the charges and they refuse to refund the money. When I went to close the account, they asked me to bring lots of ID to reactivate the account in person. Later I got a mail notice saying my account is active and please call to deactivate the account. I asked the manager saying if I was dead, would the money be depleted through service charges without letting my relatives know about the account and she said yes. She could not find any means to refund the money. BBT did not mail me nor have sent me notification regarding monthly statements. I contacted XXXX, and their complain office for BB & T is in XXXX, the same office of the BB & T head quarters. They did not intervene on my case, but acted as a medium for communication. When I tried to contact XXXX by writing I did not get any response. So please help. I have all documents and proofs. BB & T only refunded XXXX of the service charges and refused to refund the other half. 
Few things : If a customer dies, there is no written notice to the client or relatives regarding the balance in the bank. 
Second, The meaning of " BANK '' for savings is no longer applicable in BB & T because their business practices does not allow written notification regarding dormant accounts. 
Third the term " dormant '' is unfairly one way. I can not as an account holder withdraw the money without ID, but the bank can enjoy deducting money till it is empty. When I went to activate it. they need all the ID and they wanted me in person. 
Please help. 

Attached are BBT 's response for the previous case. They have attached the statements, but it was not sent electronically nor have there any alerts regarding monthly statements sent to me. BBT does not want to take responsibility for their errors but refuses to refund charges from my hard earned savings account. 
BBT also responds that Bank has the power to change anything without notice.