WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
I chose to pursue my  XXXX  and  XXXX  education in NYS, and then chose to work in jobs that serve our  XXXX  and   XXXX   XXXX   ( 501 ( c ) ( 3 ) ). In pursuing my degrees, I had to apply for federal student loans, originally through   XXXX   XXXX  , then Navient took over. Over the course of time, I was advised to consolidate my loans ( into two accounts : subsidized and unsubsidized ), During this time, and over repeated verbal contact, I repeatedly asked and continuously affirmed ( verbally via phone ) that the payment statuses and consolidated payments I made were applicable toward the Public Service Loan Forgiveness Program. Now I 'm told that the statuses and payments I 've made, during service to the communities I 've faithfully served, do n't count. I 've documented my contact with Navient, who of course, subsequently deny their representatives ' statements and I assume they 've omitted such documentation from their records. As an info systems professional, I 'm not surprised they think their denial is incontrovertible, yet they acknowledged employing people I identified during the time frame I describe below : For example, Navient employees advised, on or about ( includes, but not limited to  ) :  XX/XX/XXXX   : I was advised that none of my payments were applicable ; they apologized because this was a common complaint and they would only offer to " retrain/re-advise '' their employees as to how to advise customers.
  XX/XX/XXXX  :  per  XXXX  - advised me that income sensitive repayments were applicable to public service loan agreement .  XX/XX/XXXX   : per  XXXX  - advised me that income sensitive repayments were applicable to public service loan agreement.
As stated, I did my due diligence, in good faith, and was repeatedly advised and understood that from the inception of the public service forgiveness program until   XX/XX/XXXX  that all my payments/payment status were eligible and applied toward the public service loan forgiveness program. On  XX/XX/XXXX  I reach ed out to an agency representing the public service loan forgiveness pr ogram, MyFedLoan.org, and was advised that my status and all the payments that I 've made on my consolidated loans are no t eligible for the program. A follow up call to Navient resulted in one of their supervisors acknowledging the error, confirming that I 've been " misinformed '' all these years, apologizing, and stating there was nothing they can do but advise their employees to provide the correct information from this point forward. Their recommendation was for me to re-consolidate and restart the 120 payment ( 10 year ) from scratch. Combined loans excee d   XXXX   XXXX  . To date, I  continue to dedicate myself to public service, particularly and proudly serving those who are " Always Ready Always There, '' who are often most likely to deploy to defend us all.
I am adding some documents to my original complaint to prove that XXXX was lying to me. I did not go through the mail they sent me and after going through it I found a document that says " Provided we receive a signed copy of this Agreement from you ( the student borrower or cosigner ) by XXXX/XXXX/2015, XXXX agrees to place your Loan into in-school deferred status beginning XXXX/XXXX/2015, and ending XXXX/XXXX/2015. Monthly payment will not be required while the Loan is/are in deferred ( in-School Forbearance ) status. '' When I spoke to XXXX he ( very aggressively ) told me that my request for Forbearance was neither approved or denied yet this letter basically says I was approved for Forbearance and I just need to sign the document. Additionally the letter was mailed XXXX XXXX, 2015. I was just about to make a payment on this account to just show that I am not careless in paying my bills but now I 'm nervous that my payment would count against me in some way unless this is handled by CFPB. I tried to call AES today, Saturday, but they are closed.
My mother unexpectedly passed away last year leaving matters regarding our home up in the air. I was unable to communicate with her mortgage company until I completed the probate process, this made me I fall into foreclosures hands. I am trying to keep my mothers home, and have requested a modification with Wells Fargo. I was advised that they would work with me, I was told that all I needed to start the review was a form XXXX that I submitted with a checkstub and my XXXX. Now 2 days before my sale date I am being told that they require a full file, I could have sent this to them last week, now I am rushing to get these several documents over to Wells Fargo within a day. This is not right. To make matters worse the person I was advised would open my file is not available to take my calls, every supervisor is in a meeting, just excuse after excuse to refuse to help me and foreclose instead. I am trying to do what is right things have not been easy for me and I thought Wells Fargo understood that- I guess I was wrong, this is the first sale date for my mothers loan and they will not even allow me a couple more days to gather the laundry list of items they requested, I am hoping that I can work something out soon, I do not like to be in this predicament, I work in law enforcement helping people is my job- I was not prepared for this type of mistreatment.
I have corresponded with this company multiple times and each time I 've told them this is n't my debt and I 've requested validation as well. They recently sent me what they deem validation but it does n't belong to me. It 's a copy of a  XXXX   XXXX    XXXX    check where she paid  XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  a {$10.00} payment. I 've never lived in Texas and my name is n't  XXXX   XXXX . With all the identity theft going on they 're not careful enough to protect other people. It also has an address I 've NEVER heard of or lived at and has some  XXXX   XXXX  as my significant other. The only  XXXX   XXXX  I know of is the   XXXX   XXXX  .
Since XX/XX/XXXX, despite making my mortgage payment, in the same manner and for the same amount ( {$2300.00} ) as I had for the previous 10 months, our mortgage provider Fifth Third Bank has incorrectly processed payments. This problem has now occurred in XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ), XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ), XXXX and XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ). Each month the payment processing error is different and the problem has persisted, despite my filing XXXX complaints with the XXXX, monthly calls to Fifth Third bank Customer Service and several interactions with Fifth Third Bank 's Office of the President. I CAN NOT understand or fathom, how the bank processed these payments correctly 10 consecutive months in a row ( {$900.00} mortgage payment and {$1400.00} additional on the principal of the loan ) and suddenly not only ca n't process the payment correctly, but worse can not explain all of the errors. I have also filed a formal complaint with the Fifth Third Ethics and Compliance line on Monday XXXX XXXX, 2015 and have not even had the courtesy of a follow-up call. I find this practice unethical and likely to be occurring to other consumers who may not even be aware. I was provided this channel to file the complaint after reaching out to " XXXX On Your Side '' television investigative reporting, here in the XXXX, XXXX, FL area. I am hoping you can help, as the stress of dealing with these ongoing payment processing errors is now taking a toll on my emotional health and well being. I find this bank despicable. I have prepared and will be sending formal written complaints to the CEO of this bank and the Senior VP, whose name was on a form letter I received in XXXX, following a call from the Fifth Third Bank 's collection department on XX/XX/XXXX, informing me I had not made my XXXX XXXX payment, when in fact Fifth Third Bank had processed my check on XX/XX/XXXX, informing each of the persistent, frustrating and insulting treatment I have been receiving month after month.
I wanted to LOWER my credit card LIMIT on my Chase Southwest account to {$500.00}. I called Chase & was told this is possible but I would need to pay off the existing balance first as it was over {$500.00}. Once the payment posted, I would need to call back to LOWER the LIMIT. So I called back XXXX XXXX, 2017 & spoke with a supervisor. She assured me the LIMIT would be lowered. I called back around XX/XX/XXXX to check to make sure the LIMIT was set for {$500.00}. I was told it was. Next, I get a bill for {$1100.00}. I called Chase & asked how this is possible since I LOWERED the LIMIT. I was told I have an access line - so to prevent embarrassment they do not decline transactions. So what was the point of jumping through all the hoops to lower the limit if they are n't / do n't honor it? Not one employee or supervisor mentioned anything about being able to go over the so-called limit & there is no limit to the limit! I was told they are not obligated to tell me this. I was told if I want to increase the  limit I would need to re-apply- what is the point? I have since closed the account but wanted to bring this to your attention as I find the practices used by Chase as despicable. The charges are mine & I paid them but the point is I was expecting a bill for {$500.00} not over double.
Last XX/XX/XXXX, I filed a complaint against the credit bureaus to delete the Bank of America accounts opened in XX/XX/XXXX. I am a victim of mixed files and Bank of America sent me correspondence dated XX/XX/XXXX. In the correspondence, BOA is saying that they did an investigation and concluded that, " YOUR CREDIT FILE MAY BE COMBINED WITH SOMEONE WHO HAS A SIMILAR NAME. PLEASE CONTACT THE CONSUMER REPORTING AGENCIES LISTED BELOW TO HAVE THIS CORRECTED ''. So I did. I sent them a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX, and even filed a complaint against them with the CFPB and uploaded a copy of the letter from BOA which I am attaching to this complaint. Obviously, XXXX didn't care to investigate. They refused to delete this account that belongs to someone else. As a furnisher, it is your responsibility to correct this ASAP.
I opened an account with Credit Acceptance Corporation in  XXXX . A car loan. I made monthly payments on time every month until the loan was paid in full. For some reason,  Credit Acceptance  is reporting I made  1  late payment  XXXX . This is incorrect. I made payments on time every month. I then traded the car in, in  XXXX  of  XXXX . I do n't understand how they are reporting that the last payment that was made was a late payment.     It is not fair that I pay all my bills on time and  Credit Acceptance  gets to report a delusional late payment. I have disputed this problem and nothing has changed. This late payment is being reported incorrectly. I WAS NEVER LATE.
Chexsystems reporting fraud from XXXX XXXX XXXX on my accounts were fraud was reported and case number from the FTC dated XX/XX/XXXX. I have tried to fax and mail copies of filed fraud and still no response. Chex Systems took the information from XXXX XXXX XXXX and is unfounded and investigated for fraud.
Optimum Outcomes is reporting to XXXX a collection in the amount of {$740.00} for XXXX XXXX with a delinquency date of XXXX XXXX. I was seen at XXXX XXXX in fall of XXXX but medical insurance paid the full amount since I had met my deductible. I have lived at my current address in XXXX since XXXX XXXX. I never received a XXXX day collection activity from Optimum Outcomes and it was reported to XXXX XXXX credit file without me being able to fully validate debt. Optimum Outcome is in direct violation of federal law by reporting inaccurate debt by re-aging the delinquency/open date to XXXX XXXX which is illegal. If this debt did occur it would have been in XXXX and the delinquency date would have started then, but since I tried disputing the debt, I am unsure if I owe this medical debt which also violates HIPPA Laws. I did dispute the debt but it remains on my credit file and has been being reported since XXXX XXXX. Since they have re-aged a debt or received misinformation from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX and reported inaccurate information they Optimum Outcome is in direct violation of federal law under the FCRA. If the collection item is not deleted I would like FCRA penalties and fines against the reporting company, Optimum Outcomes. I have lived in XXXX since XXXX XXXX and can prove this address was on my credit file then and proof of employment starting in XXXX XXXX.
XXXX opened a invalid 7 year car loan debt on my credit report that was bought by a collection agency ( accelerated financial ), which I m sure is totally out of the legal standard, after XXXX disputes XXXX wont still remove it from my report
My husband and I applied for a mortgage with Suntrust because they have been our bank for 13 years. Their customer service is horrible I am crying for the 5th time as I am writing this complaint. The website lies about how they will service you. 
1. They do not call or email us giving us an update. 
2. Every time we call them we get a voicemail only to be ignored. 
3. I called the customer service line who said the manager was on the other line and would call me right back, and I 'm still waiting. 
4. We lost money on moving trucks, and we are now in danger of having to move the settlement date up on our home we are selling. 
5. My and my husbands employers are upset with us for changing our days off 3x. 
6. It 's as if they do n't care about anyone and do everything in their power to make a happy life event as stressful and aggravating as possible. 
I understand they make good money in the stock market but not so much on Mortgages, so why, then, do n't they just get out of the mortgage business altogether instead of pretending they want to give you a mortgage and at the end, hope they aggravate you so much that you just want to pull out? I wish so bad I chose a different lender, it 's like they know they got you and do n't care. Please help I ca n't stop crying!
Equifax was compromised. Instead of reaching out to those it believed were involved I had to investigate it myself to prevent potential usage of my information.
This lender had shown up at my house and left a business card with my XXXX XXXX XXXX son. I then sent a letter of non-contact, requesting to no longer be contacted through phone or in person, but only via USPS mail, and cited Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. They have since called me and said that they " are not under that law according to their supervisor XXXX XXXX so they are going to continue to call. '' Today they called me at work. This is unacceptable. I have also sent a Pay for Delete letter to their home office, certified mail, that was picked up yesterday, I believe, which also requested contact via USPS mail only.
under tx law the collection of a debt has to include a sworn account this is not sworn to and so may not be mine I have no recollection fo being in this place at this time arringin by ambulance etc I have been to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX but I am thinking that this is not me I had care and care insurance under medicare a medicare replacement insurance co privately funded insurance that takes some of the financial burden off medicare social security and provides also supplemental ( ie more than medicare allows to its patients. ) I don't have the funds due to income stolen but these collection agencies just send bills that is why the tx law requires at least a sworn account of all of it.. under another insurance co XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX a regular inspection of underlying documentation I found in XX/XX/XXXX XXXX that was wrongly billed for a XXXX XXXX and XXXX of my kid. so I want the details to make sure this is me and not been paid by my insurance co and that this is not just late fees and someone elses bill I had been starved by the XXXX county probate court which took over 150000 in assets and would not even provide m a cent for food transportation anything for 5 months from XX/XX/XXXX to after XX/XX/XXXX when I ended up in XXXX for XXXX I lived on samples from XXXX XXXX and XXXX to which I walked 12 mis a day this situation has been declared void under t sup court XXXX all my stuff in trust and unsubjects to guardianships and no personal jurisdiction over me.
I disputed inquiries that were not made by me, however I have not heard back from them. I will attach a copy of my credit report from XXXX XXXX ( XXXX/ Equifax ) each hard inquiry marked in was infact one I allowed. All other visible inquiries are ones not authorized by me.
On XXXX XXXX, I attempted to open an account with a credit union. Apparently they use Chex Systems , Inc. for a check before allowing you to open an account. Chex Systems responds with " Driver license is not on state file '' so I was declined. This has never happened to me before. I asked them to run it again, same thing. I contacted the local Division of Motor Vehicles in XXXX XXXX, MO who indicated my driver 's license is on file and the driver 's license number is correct. I then contacted the Missouri Department of Revenue in XXXX XXXX, MO who also confirmed my driver 's license is on file and the driver 's license number is correct. I 've sent a letter explaingin all this to Chex Systems , Inc via fax to their complaint department and consumer relations department XXXX XXXX, 2015 and have heard nothing back. This is a time sensitive matter for reasons I wo n't discuss here and have spent several hours trying to figure out how to get this inaccurate information taken care of quickly, so it has me extremely frustrated.
In XXXX and XXXX XXXX, the following accounts were deleted from all 3 credit bureaus : XXXX XXXX in the amount of {$64.00} -XXXX XXXX XXXX in the amount of {$440.00} In XXXX of XXXX and XXXX XXXX both accounts were reinserted back onto my credit report. According to the fair credit reporting law we are supposed to be notified before reinsertion of any deleted accounts on a consumers credit report. I did not receive any reinsertion notification about either of these accounts. Here is the law below : FCRA 611, Procedure in case of disputed accuracy [ 15 U.S.C. 1681i ] Requirements relating to reinsertion of previously deleted material : Certification of accuracy of information. If any information is deleted from a consumer 's file pursuant to subparagraph ( A ), the information may not reinserted in the file by the consumer reporting agency unless the person who furnishes the information certifies the information is complete and accurate. 

If any information that has been deleted from a consumer 's file pursuant to subparagraph ( A ) is reinserted in the file, the consumer reporting agency shall notify the consumer of the reinsertion in writing not later than 5 business days after the reinsertion or, if authorized by the consumer for that purpose, by any other means available to the agency. Additional information. As part of, or in addition to, the notice under clause ( ii ), a  consumer reporting agency shall provide to a consumer in writing no later than 5 business days after the reinsertion date. 
( I ) a statement that the disputed information has been reinserted ; ( II ) the business name and address of any furnisher of information contacted and the telephone number of such furnisher, if reasonably available, or of any furnisher of information that contacted the consumer reporting agency, in connection with the reinsertion of such information ; and ( III ) a notice that the consumer has the right to add a statement to the consumer 's file disputing the accuracy or completeness of the disputed information.
I was late paying my auto loan, Westlake Financial has called my work number 5 times in 2 1/2 hours ( XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX ) and has called my cell phone in 3 hours ( XXXX, XXXX, XXXX ). 

Every time I am late making my loan payment they harass me by calling my work and cell phone number repeatedly. Then when I do speak to them, they are very hateful. 

What are my options?
Experian is reporting incorrect and fraudulent information on my credit report. I have never opened an account with XXXX XXXX XXXX or never entered into any agreement or contract. 
Please remove information from my credit file. ( Experian, XXXX XXXX ) Please find the enclosed Affidavit of Identity Theft, regarding the above mentioned account. Please cease from reporting this information on my credit file [ FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 6 ) ( B ) ]
COLLECTOR FAILED TO CEASE AND DESIST COLLECTION EFFORTS FOR CONTY TAX BILL DATED XX/XX/XXXX. THE S.O.L EXPIRED ON XX/XX/XXXX. CEASE COMMUNICATIONS OR BE SUED IN CLASS ACTION.
CitiMortgage denied request for modification stating : " Threre was an irreconcilable discrepancy within your application request. '' CitiMortgage is not providing additional information and we have only been reviewed for Citi Supplemental Modification Program. The denial letter was dated XXXX/XXXX/2015.
Re : Discriminatory Practices This Formal Complaint is against JP Morgan Chase Bank and the Bank Manager XXXX XXXX XXXX. On XXXX/XXXX/16 at approximately XXXX XXXX I entered the bank ( XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) to make a deposit. 

While standing on line, a customer in front of me walked up to the bank teller and handed the teller his money and deposit slip only, and his transaction was processed. 

I walked up to the teller and handed my deposit slip and money to him. He immediately requested to see my I.D, I then politely asked why do I have to produce my I.D and the gentlemen standing at the teller window next to him did not have to produce his I.D . He replied " that 's a business customer and they do n't have to show their identification '' I then requested to speak with the bank supervisor. 

XXXX XXXX came to the window, and I asked him the same question and he gave me a different answer stating " the teller knows that customer that 's why he did n't have to show his I.D I then replied " is that fair, is this really the policy '' He then stated " some customers do n't have to show their I.D because it states KNOWN CUSTOMER on their account. I then replied that does not make sense. He then stated in a boisterous manner " I know my bank policies do you '' I then asked, am I 'm being targeted because I 'm XXXX. He replied in a very condescending matter " I 'm offended that you would say that because I 'm XXXX XXXX and I 'm darker then you '' I then requested his business card, which he gave me. I then made my deposit with my I.D and left the bank. 

I received XXXX different explanations has to why I had to show my I.D and the XXXX male customers did n't. For over 10 years I 've been doing business with Chase Bank