WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
In XX/XX/XXXX, after ten years paying XXXX XXXX account # XXXX, XXXX XXXX sold my mortgage loan services to Green Tree. I pay my mortgages by check mailed from XXXX XXXX 's main XXXX XXXX on XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX on the XX/XX/XXXX. The first seven XX/XX/XXXX payments went to GreenTree account # XXXX. The last five XX/XX/XXXX payments went to Ditech account # XXXX. GreenTree 's XX/XX/XXXX updated statement represented a 'principal balance ' of {$47000.00}. I made all $ 2000 monthly payments since XX/XX/XXXX in time through XX/XX/XXXX. Accordingly, Ditech 's XX/XX/XXXX 's statement showed a 'principal balance ' of just over {$24000.00}. XX/XX/XXXX statement 's declining 'principal balance ' reflected just over {$22000.00}. I appeal to CFPB here because Ditech 's subsequent three XX/XX/XXXX monthly statements for XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, and XX/XX/XXXX reflected the same 'principal balance ' amount of just over {$22000.00}. Furthermore, Ditech 's XX/XX/XXXX counts my XX/XX/XXXX payment in a " Total Paid Year to Date '' amount of exactly {$24000.00} or 12 times {$2000.00}. My primary appeal to CFPB believes I have paid off the mortgage for XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, although Ditech disagrees. 

My secondary CFPB appeal here questions first GreenTree 's and now Ditech 's increasing, instead of decreasing, monthly statements ' 'amount due ' amounts. XXXX XXXX  's monthly 'amount due ' amounts annually decreased from $ XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX to $ XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX when GreenTree became my mortgage service provider, decreasing because I always paid {$2000.00} each month on a fixed rate mortgage pegged at 4.875 %. In less than four years GreenTree and Ditech increased the monthly 'amount due ' amount to {$1900.00} due by JXX/XX/XXXX. In XX/XX/XXXX, the year GreenTree became my mortgage service provider, Vermont 's attorney general had GreenTree restore Vermont citizens ' money paid to GreenTree for GreenTree 's fraudulent mortgage services. XXXX 's first Attorney General, XXXX XXXX, first won election in XX/XX/XXXX. GreenTree 's Vermont legal outcome, GreenTree and Ditech 's annually increasing 'amount due ' amounts, my own XX/XX/XXXX $ 22,000+ 'principal balance ', and XX/XX/XXXX statement 's {$24000.00} 'total paid year to date ' amount, all let me wonder if I my mortgage payoff completion passed with XX/XX/XXXX 's pay receipt. If so then Ditech owes me at least {$2000.00} instead of me owing Ditech {$6900.00} more. 

This CFPB appeal should also inform Ditech of XX/XX/XXXX payment 's possible late arrival if at all. My faith in transparency urges CFPB 's publishing with account numbers and the aforementioned DC address.
My identity was stolen in XXXX while living in XXXX. I took all necessary steps and filed a police report and have closely monitored my credit, checking account, etc. since then. I now live in XXXX and discovered SCA Collections placed a collection acct. on my XXXX  credit report in XX/XX/XXXX. ( The collection does not show up on XXXX or XXXX   ). I filed the first dispute with XXXX upon discovery and SCA Collections stated the acct. is mine. I never received any phone calls or mail from SCA Collections regarding this supposed debt. I contacted the original debtor ( XXXX ) and they could not find anything with my name or DOB in their system. I filed a second dispute and SCA Collections stated again the acct. is mine. I just filed a third dispute today, XX/XX/XXXX. As of today, I have also filed a report with the Federal Trade Commission, XXXX XXXX XXXX, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Colorado Attorney General 's office. I mailed and emailed documentation to SCA Collections on XX/XX/XXXX, as they are not responding to my voicemails, emails and on-line inquiries. I also discovered an address on my XXXX credit report that is not mine as well and that was also mentioned in the FTC report. My next step is to file a report with the local police department of XXXX, XXXX.
I submitted a complaint to CFPB ( XXXX ) and XXXX denied the allegation and were snide in their response as well, I might add. Per XXXX 's letter dated X/XX/2017, 'We respectfully decline to request any changes to the information provided to the credit reporting agencies '. To this I reply, " XXXX, you are not at liberty to decline. It is the law that you delete the information per The Fair Credit Reporting Act and the State Attorney Generals Office of Consumer Affairs, because it is not accurate information as you purport. '' You are not truth telling when you state in your letter that you are reporting in a consistent and accurate manner to the agencies. I have attached, and have hard copies, from the three different credit bureaus to prove that you in fact have been reporting different balances and payment histories to all three agencies, to include wrong/different reporting for the month of XXXX  2017. Ill regardless of my payment arrangement, that I made a payment on today, you must delete the account as I am requesting by law, as you have violated credit reporting laws, and refuse to obey and delete. '' In your letter you mention a {$100.00} difference you credited me in the total remaining balance on my settlement agreement as the reason for the credit agencies having different totals, etc. The difference you are reporting to XXXX and Experian is a {$2700.00} difference. And the XXXX  difference in comparison to what is being reported to Experian is $ XXXX.You XXXX , suggest request that I contact the Credit reporting agencies regarding discrepancies. You contradict your earlier statement of, 'XXXX is merely a furnisher of credit information, and not the agency, and has no control of the contents of credit history maintained by the agency. ' You are the original reporter and must request that they delete this inaccurate/inconsistent account from all three agencies. I did not say delete my payment arrangement, I said delete this account off my record as is your responsibility to me the consumer, per fair credit reporting laws.
I am a victim of identity theft. Several years ago someone broke into my office and stole several ID documents, including my social security card, driver 's license and passport. I filed a police report with the XXXX Police Department. The XXXX   approved my report and gave me the official report number # REPORT NUMBER : XXXX I have attached a copy of the report to this complaint. 

The last negative item due to the identity theft is for an apartment complex lease I did not authorize, know about, or execute myself. I disputed this directly with the apartment complex and forwarded their management a copy of the police report. They asked me to also send a copy to this debt collector, which I have now done through the official CFPB portal.
PAID OFF THE BALANCE DUE XX/XX/2019 {$11000.00} - PAID OFF EARLY ONXX/XX/2018 BUT RECEIVED NO BENEFIT FOR EARLY PAYMENT. TALKED WITH TWO SUPERVISIORS WITH NO ADJUSTMENT - IN BANKING WE CALCULATE INTEREST ON SIMPLE WHICH SHOULD SAVE ME {$190.00} IF I HAD PAID THE BALANCE OF {$10000.00} ON XX/XX/2018 - THEY WOULD GET NO INTEREST. IT WOULD SEEM THAT {$1200.00} IN INTEREST FOR A 4 DAY LATE PAYMENT WOULD MAKE THEIR DAY. IT WAS NOT DISCUSSED AT THE TIME SHARE XXXX ABOUT THE DEFERRED INTEREST AND I ASSUMED THE INTEREST WOULD START AFTHER 6 MONTHS.

XXXX XXXX - XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, TEXAS XXXX E-MAIL XXXX XXXX
Nationstar Mortgage continually misappropriates my payments. They put the money wherever they feel like, and I have to call on a monthly basis to get it straightened out. I pay my taxes and insurance and have had no escrow since the establishment of the mortgage. In XXXX, they paid my insurer, out of an escrow account that did n't exist, XXXX 10 XXXX days after I paid the homeowners insurance in full. Then they made me responsible for getting their money back. I received a check from my insurer. I put the check, a letter describing what happened and what needs to be done, and a copy of their letter that detailed the situation. The money was full appropriated to my principal and they told me my escrow account, which does n't exist, was in arreers. I had to call to get this matter straightened out and they had XXXX XXXX XXXX payment misappropriated. If I would n't have checked on my mortgage, I would have been " late '' on payment because of this. Now, as I attempt to make another mortgage payment, They have increased my payment approximately {$64.00} to cover escrow costs. THERE IS NO ESCROW ACCOUNT, THERE NEVER WILL BE!. I now have to call them again and get my account straightened out. They are under several investigations, and have several pending lawsuits against them. I want my mortgage sold to a reputable mortgage company.
During XXXX and XXXX, I requested to be place in the PSLF plan and was told several times by Navient that I did not qualify. During this time, I worked for XXXX XXXX XXXX in the XXXXXXXX XXXX. I was unable to make the payments and therefore my account went into default.
I went to get my free annual credit report from Experian and basically to do it, I would have to get charged XXXX dollar and get forced into a trial period for a service I do not want. I also looked at XXXX and XXXX XXXX and found the same thing. I am concerned about identity theft, as I had recent unauthorized activity on one of my credit cards, but I have to pay and be forced into a trial of a product or service I do not want to be able to check my credit, even for the first time in a year. I find that not only deceptive and unfair, but bordering upon abuse of the public to force them to buy services or products in order to get a service that is supposed to be free once a year. When I told Experian I wanted a free credit report, they referred me to yet another site that is neither of the XXXX bureaus.
IRS says my funds were released on XXXX/XXXX/16 to my Netspend account that I 've had for years. A couple days go by and I still do not have my funds. When I call customer service it 's always someone Foreign who I can never understand. They tell me I need to check with IRS about my money. I should n't have to check with them when my direct deposit is with Netspend!! So I get on Netspend page on XXXX and seems like everyone is having the same issue. People opting for the Netspend card when they filed their taxes and no money. Turns out that Netspend has rejected everyone 's tax refund and now IRS will be mailing out a check on XXXX/XXXX/16. I had plans to move my family on a certain date now I ca n't thanks to Netspend not giving me the money that I have earned. They keep lying on their page instead of telling people the real truth on where their money is. The customer service sucks and they do not care about their customers.
Earlier this year Navy Federal credit union did an unauthorized transfer from my checking account to an installment loan without notifying me. This resulted in checks that I previously written being returned for non-sufficient funds. Navy Federal then charged me a NSF returned check fee, when the reason there was not sufficient money available and the returned was because they took it upon themselves to make an unauthorized transfer out of my checking account without notifying me. Then Later they completed another unauthorized transfer from my checking account to a revolving line of credit as a payment. I did not authorize this transfer either and was again not notified. That and that unauthorized transfer over-drafted my checking account. Most recently Navy Federal yet again did an authorized advance from my line of credit to my checking account to cover the overdraft that they caused In the first place, and the bogus fees that also were a result of their bad business practices of transferring money between customers accounts without notification or authorization. The unauthorized draft that they did from my line of credit account put my line of credit over its credit limit of XXXX
Equifax fails to remove the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX account. Equifax reports incorrectly that this account has a balance {$22000.00}. Equifax reports incorrectly that this is an XXXX account. Equifax reports incorrectly this account 's Date of First Delinquency. Equifax continues to report inaccurate information on my credit file which lowers my credit score. This causes me the inability to obtain credit and lowers my standards of living and causes me to languish and suffer.
I received an alert from my credit report from that a new account was opened in my name but I've never heard of XXXX XXXX XXXX. They came up on.y credit report and I want to dispute and find out who and what this company is and why they are reporting to my credit.
My husbands name was on my house 's mortgage. He passed away XXXX 2012. Since then I have paid the mortgage and have received a XXXX form for income tax filing. This year, Chase has decided that they do not need to send me this form and report the interest I have paid. I have paid the interest from my personal checking account and my name was on the deed even before my husband 's passing ( done at the time of purchase ).
Why, if you are reporting the account as paid timely in XXXX XXXX to XXXX XXXX, are you then reporting the account to XXXX and XXXX as paid 30 days late in that same month of XXXX XXXX. Obviously both statements can be true so why are you confirming to the credit bureaus that you have investigated this account and both of those statements are true? 
Additionally, you are reporting the account to XXXX XXXX as late for the months of XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, and XXXX XXXX. On XXXX XXXX and XXXX you have reported these months as paid on time. 
Additionally you have reported to XXXX XXXX that the account was paid on time in XXXX of XXXX then the next month in XXXX XXXX it shows as 60 days past due. You claim to have " investigated '' and found this to be accurate. If you can explain this accounting of timely in XXXX then 60 Days late the next month in XXXX, I would love to hear that explanation. 
Finally, your correspondence of XXXX XXXX, XXXX indicates that the account was late 3 times 30 days or more. If this is accurate, why did you subsequently verify to the credit bureaus the 60 day late payments in XXXX and XXXX of XXXX? 
I am asking for them to remove all negative late payments because they failed to perform a substantive investigation, in fact any type of investigation would have uncovered these discrepancies. 
Sincerely, XXXX XXXX
Greetings, I have initiated multiple disputes with NELNET for incorrectly reported late payments on the NELNET Account # XXXX. They have failed to fully validated that the account was late during the months being reported on my XXXX, XXXX XXXX & XXXX credit reports. XXXX, XXXX XXXX & XXXX  should not be reporting incorrect information per the Fair Credit Reporting Act and must remove / delete the following reported late payments below. I have provided all requested documents to NELNET, XXXX, XXXX XXXX & XXXX to get this issue resolved in which they requested. They have also failed to provided me with requested information in which I have asked to Prove I was late in any of the months provided within the 30-day time frame. The NELNET account being reported is currently in good status/standing but is showing as a negative account being reported on my credit report. On each of my credit reports they are different late payment months being reported and does not line up with each other which shows inaccuracy. This ERROR has severely affected my chances to gain professional employment, increase credit & apply for a home for me and my family. Below are the reported late months that should be Removed/Deleted from my personal credit reports : XXXX Reported Late Payments : 1 ) XX/XX/XXXX 2 ) XX/XX/XXXX 3 ) XX/XX/XXXX 4 ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Reported Late Payments : 1 )XX/XX/XXXX 2 ) XX/XX/XXXX 3 ) XX/XX/XXXX 4 ) XX/XX/XXXX, 5 ) XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Reported Late Payments : 1 ) XX/XX/XXXX 2 ) XX/XX/XXXX 3 ) XX/XX/XXXX 4 ) XX/XX/XXXX, 5 ) XX/XX/XXXX Should you need any additional information please let me know. Thank you for your assistance in resolving this matter. 

Regards, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, PA XXXX
The car that was allegedly leased was repossessed with the original creditor and was not resold. According to Virginia state law once the vehicle has been repossessed, the original creditor may decide to either keep it as compensation for your debt or resell it in a public or private sale. The original creditor decided to keep the car as compensation and therefore I no longer owe the original creditor for the lease of this vehicle. If this car was resold proper notices were not given. Under the laws of the State of Virginia UCC and State RISA and MVISA statutes a deficiency can not be claimed unless all of the required notices were properly and timely given, and all of the allowable redemption and cure time limits were adhered to. State law also requires that the creditor tell you the time and place of the sale so that you can attend and participate in the bidding or If the vehicle will be sold privately, you have a right to know the date of the sale. None of these things have been done or provided by this collection agency to properly validate that this debt is owed. 
I want to be provided the following : A proper validation with the signed contract with the original creditor A copy of purchase agreement between the original creditor and XXXX XXXX XXXX. With the original creditor giving all rights to this debt including the right to receive payment and charge interest to XXXX XXXX XXXX 
If there have been any other changes or adjustments since the last billing statement from the original creditor, for them to please provide full verification and documentation of the amount you are trying to collect. Explain how that amount was calculated. In addition, explain how the other changes or adjustments are authorized by the agreement creating the debt and permitted by law in my state. 
Do they have a debt collection license from my state? provide the date of the license, the name on the license, the license number, and the name, address and telephone number of the state agency issuing the license. 
Provide proof that all of the required notices were properly and timely given, and all of the allowable redemption and cure time limits were adhered to. 
If the leased vehicle was sold provide proof with a copy of the required State law notice sent of the amount, time, and place of the sale and If the vehicle was sold privately, provide the proper notice with the amount and date of the sale.
Reference ( Copy of Email Communication to date ) : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX XXXX : Requested to have account closed since credit line was denied and no business transaction was going to be enacted. 
XX/XX/XXXX, Their response in brief : " ... we regret to inform you that XXXX can not honor your request to delete your personal information from our database. We are required by federal and state laws to retain and keep a record of any customer information submitted to us. '' The rest of the email response is referenced above. 

No exchange of funds transpired, but personal information may be at risk of being sold, abused, or misused. They chose to not do business with me, and I chose to not do business with them, therefore requesting to have my account closed.
XXXX XXXX ( DBA Supreme Lending ) NMLS ID # XXXX is the lender and XXXX XXXX of XXXX XXXX is their loan officer. Have gotten false and conflicting information consistently from XXXX and his office and have tried contacting both the regional manager ( XXXX XXXX ) and the branch overseer in Texas ( XXXX XXXX ) and received no response whatsoever. Disclosures came in wildly different than what XXXX represented on the phone and then he promised orally to send new ones that were correct and took weeks and much cajoling to do it even and they were STiLL wrong. Months of delays and then tells us that the files still have n't gone to underwriting because " they fell through the cracks, '' then he says later that it was " customary procedure '' for them not to get the file approved until AFTER an appraisal, which was n't ordered until weeks after the file was at Supreme Lending. When challenged, he then said that 's the way Supreme Lending does it. That 's odd, since they are charging the borrower for the appraisal even before they know if they can do the loan. Furthermore they did n't even ORDER the appraisal for a month while they had the entire file in their possession. Furthermore, XXXX prior lending partner ordered an appraisal for XXXX of the properties and it was completed and never paid for ( the company went out of business ), so the appraiser is going after US for the payment because he refuses to do the right thing and pay them and get a correct appraisal at the same time. Now they are using a demonstrably WRONG appraisal as the new basis for doing the loan at a much reduced value. We have detailed the inaccuracies and they have taken a week to respond and then basically said they were n't going to do anything about it.
Bankruptcy was dismissed  XX/XX/XXXX  and still has not been removed. ( Was originally filed XX/XX/XXXX  ).
Judgment was satisfied Supreme Court State of N.Y XX/XX/XXXX  and still has not been removed.
Bank Of America/XXXX XXXX Representatives told me that if I have a combined amount of {$50000.00} in my BofA and XXXX Accounts, I would be able to do 20 monthly trades for free, and after 3 months, I would receive a {$200.00} cash reward. I put {$60000.00} to my BofA account and transferred {$10000.00} to XXXX, and did not touch the money since then. 

Upon calling after 4 months, they said that it will take time to receive the cash reward, and upon calling after 6 months they said that at least {$20000.00} of the combined amount should have been at XXXX XXXX, and because of that I did not receive it. They told me that they would fix it and get back to me asap, but they did not. It has been another 3 months now. 

I think this was a mis-representation/misinformation on their side and they did not provide accurate/clear information to customers. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX
You have illegally attempted to run my credit for a auto loan I never applied for with your bank which is illegal. CFPB may fine Wells Fargo as much as {$1.00} XXXX : report The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau may fine Wells Fargo WFC, several hundred million dollars and as much as {$1.00} XXXX for auto insurance and mortgage lending abuses, XXXX reported, citing sources with knowledge of the plans. The fine would be the first since XXXX XXXX was named interim director of the CFPB. XXXX is eyeing a penalty that would dwarf the {$100.00} XXXX the CFPB fined Wells Fargo in XX/XX/2016 to settle its phony accounts scandal,  the report said. 

You are continuing to violate consumer rights.
There are inquiries on my report that I did not authorize. I also have information on my credit report that is still reporting after multiple request to send verifiable proof. I have not received verifiable proof of these accounts and I would like this information removed.