WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
My wife and I purchased our home XX/XX/XXXX for {$350000.00}. Since that time we have made timely payments each month and made significant improvements to the home. By XX/XX/XXXX mortgage balance was slightly less than {$290000.00}, while the market value of the house increased to somewhere between {$400000.00} - {$450000.00}. The mortgage has been held by multiple banks since inception, and was held by Ditech Financial XX/XX/XXXX, when we made a written request to cancel the PMI, based on the principal balance to market value ratio. 
In response to the PMI cancellation request, Ditech contracted with local Realtor XXXX XXXX to perform a Broker Price Opinion ( BPO ). XXXX XXXX came to the house to evaluate the property, and orally stated to us that it would " easily value at {$400000.00} or more ''. However, it is apparent that Ditech then communicated with XXXX XXXX about the principal balance left on the mortgage, and which time she returned a BPO with a value of {$380000.00}, several thousand dollars below the amount needed to cancel the PMI. 
Several facts make it clear that the final BPO was manipulated. Firstly, the BPO listed XXXX comparable sales, and in XXXX of the XXXX comparables the " Adjusted Price of Subject '' was significantly above {$380000.00}. The only comparable that set an " Adjusted Price of Subject '' less than {$380000.00} was 'Comparable # XXXX ' ( {$380000.00} XXXX and this property is located in an entirely different county, in less desirable school districts. Looking at the " Adjusted Price of Subject '' of the other XXXX comparables, the average figure is {$400000.00}. Even including Comparable # XXXX, the average figure would still be over {$400000.00}. Additionally, the Realtor selected XXXX comparable as being " Most Similar to Subject ''. These XXXX properties established " Adjusted Price of Subject '' values of {$430000.00} and {$390000.00}, for an average of {$410000.00}. 
Finally, the " Additional Comments '' section of the XXXX undermine the final determination reached by the Realtor. In this section ( page XXXX ) the Realtor notes the extensive upgrades made to the property. She expressly listed the major upgrades made, and notes " Upgrades equal to {$48000.00}. '' Given these upgrades, and the purchase price of {$350000.00}, even if the property did not increase in value since purchase ( which it undoubtedly has, as has every property in our neighborhood ) then fair marker value of the house would still be around {$400000.00}. Please note that all of these values listed above are greater than the {$380000.00} value listed in the BPO, and all of these other figures would have resulted in the cancellation of our PMI. Finally, while it may or may not be relevant the Realtor who conducted the PMI was the exact same Realtor who represented the seller when the purchased the house XX/XX/XXXX. She knew or should have known the value of the house at that time, and undoubtedly is aware that prices have increased in the neighborhood since we bought our home.
I believe this is more of a problem with a potential creditor, and not Experian itself. I am not sure how to proceed, however, here is what happened. I applied for a credit card sometime prior to XXXX, just XXXX with XXXX. I did n't hear about approval so I called and inquired, and then followed up with a letter dated XXXX XXXX, 2015. My experian credit report notes XXXX hard inquiries spaced just weeks apart, XXXX XXXX, 2014, XXXX XXXX, 2015, XXXX XXXX, 2015, and XXXX XXXX, 2015. 

I know this is impossible because there would be no way I would attempt to reapply for credit in such a short time frame, so I have XXXX hard inquiries on this report that will be on this report incorrectly for two years from now. It is wrong, and I only gave permission for XXXX hard inquiry.
As of XX/XX/2017, the new law states that no public records, civil judgements or tax liens will report on your credit report. I have contacted each credit bureau regarding the new law XXXX removed the public records however XXXX and Experian still will not remove the public records from their file.
On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Bank of America 's agent foreclosed on my house. After the completed foreclosure sale, the substitute trustee executed a trustee 's deed to the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX filed an eviction suit and was awarded Judgment of Possession. 

On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, I filed a lawsuit to stop a post-foreclosure wrongful eviction. This lawsuit XXXX is currently pending in the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX because the Defendants ( XXXX and Bank of America ) was granted leave to file an answer to the complaint more than two years late. 

On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Bank of America and XXXX filed a late answer to the lawsuit and included the following affirmative defense : XXXX. Should Plaintiff be awarded any damages, Defendants are entitled to offset and recoupment in the amount the funds due and owing at the time of the foreclosure sale plus reasonable market value rent from the date of foreclosure until the service release of the loan to non-party XXXX. 

As per the aforementioned defense, XXXX predecessor, Bank of America, is asking for rent after the foreclosure sale on XXXX XXXX, XXXX in their answer. However, XXXX contends I owe them more than {$110000.00} for the same loan their predecessor foreclosed on. I have not executed any loan agreements to Bank of America or XXXX since the foreclosure sale on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. 

XXXX is reporting this fraudulent, incorrect, and false information to a third party, the credit bureaus ( XXXX. ) Bank of America is claiming the house was foreclosed and they are seeking rent post foreclosure. 

XXXX is claiming I contractually owe them from XXXX XXXX. 

To add on, XXXX is reporting to XXXX that the loan is a contested foreclosure. 

XXXX is reporting contradictory and false information to XXXX the credit bureaus, and me. 

XXXX has not been able to validate their debt collection activity. 

Bank of America and XXXX are colluding and harassing me to collect a loan that was satisfied from foreclosure proceeds four years ago. 

I will be filing this complaint with the XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ; since my loan was XXXX insured loan. 


I 've included the following documents to substantiate my claims : 1. The Defendants ' Late Answer excerpts XXXX XXXX. XXXX ) 2. The most recent docket entry of the pending lawsuit, XXXX. XXXX ; Order Continuing Stay dated XXXX XXXX, XXXX These are records that are documented in the Federal Court that are undisputed.
at this time they have to different collection companys reporting on a single account XXXX XXXX is reporting I owe XXXX to XXXX and rgs financial is reporting to report I owe XXXX to XXXX I have disputed and they removed account now rgs is placed back with out 5 day re insert notice and another collection account is added for 1 single account that was unverified. 
certified mail track numberXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX- as they are aware you cant have to tradeline names reporting on a single collection account, that defimation of credit report and is unlawfull to low score, at this time I do entend to file suit on this matter you are in violation of the fcra.
Pay pal is issuing credit cards with a revolving line of credit without the consumer submitting an application. I made a purchase and it automatically opened up a PayPal credit account. I called customer service to have them close the account and they said that I filled out an application, which I had not. And, they said that they would close the account but that I would have to submit in writing a request to have the inquiry removed from my credit report. This conversation took place less than an hour from the time I received the email saying " welcome to PayPal credit ''. Almost all of the links on this welcome email direct you to a splashy video on how you can get what you want when you want it. It is very difficult to find where the late payment fees and the annual percentage rate fees are.
I submitted This to XXXX XXXX XXXX - who then forwarded it to XXXX XXXX ( CFPB ) - per Our telephone conversation - I am filing this with CFPB - my entire submitted file was XXXX pages and can submit to you as needed : Under FTC Settlement, Debt Buyer Agrees to Pay XXXX for Alleged Consumer deception - - - XXXX - I was recently sued by asset acceptance in regards to a credit card debt from XX/XX/XXXX and the statute of limitations was well over - I feel as though this case is part of their FTC settlement for the following : The asterisks mark the what they did to me & my court case : *****misrepresenting that consumers owed a debt when it could not substantiate its representations ; *****failing to disclose that debts are too old to be legally enforceable or that a partial payment would extend the time a debt could be legally enforceable ; providing information to credit reporting agencies, while knowing or having reasonable cause to believe that the information was inaccurate ; failing to notify consumers in writing that it provided negative information to a credit reporting agency ; failing to conduct a reasonable investigation when it received a notice of dispute from a credit reporting agency ; repeatedly calling third parties who do not owe a debt ; informing third parties about a debt ; *****using illegal debt-collection practices, including misrepresenting the character, amount, or legal status of a debt ; providing inaccurate information to credit reporting agencies ; and making false representations to collect a debt ; and*****failing to provide verification of the debt and continuing to attempt to collect a debt when it is disputed by the consumer. 

I have been back to court 4 times since XX/XX/XXXX - finally XXXX the Judge ordered this dismissed as the statute of Limitations was over - it was time-barred and they had no documentation supporting a payment was made as they had claimed I made a payment and that restarted the SOL in Wisconsin - I have court documentation of the case and the numerous ploys used by asset acceptance and XXXX XXXX which was representing them - Please guide me as to where to continue my grievance - it is my understanding this lawsuit against them was in XXXX Court via the FTC - FTC File No. XXXX - as far as I am concerned they are still practicing what they were sued for. 
Thank you - XXXX XXXX
I have   XXXX   accounts  with Stuart Lippman that I d isputed, due to the fact that these are payments to an insurance company for money owed to credit unions. I currently pay this money every month to a clerk of courts. After I filed the original dispute back in  XXXX  around the  XXXX , of  2017 ,  XXXX  accounts were removed from my credit files. However, around  XXXX   XXXX ,  2017   XXXX  of the accounts were added back to my file without my knowledge.   In accordance with t  he requirements of the FCRA section 611 ( a ) ( 5 ) ( B ) ( ii ), you are required to notify me of the reinsertion in writing within 5 business days.
( B ) Requirements relating to reinsertion of previously deleted material ( ii ) Notice to consumer If any information that has been deleted from a consumer 's file pursuant to subparagraph ( A ) is reinserted in the file, the consumer reporting agency shall notify the consumer of the reinsertion in writing not later than 5 business days after the reinsertion or if authorized by the consumer for that purpose, by any other means available to the agency.
I received no such notifications  . This is a very serious violation of the FCRA, and I reserve the right to pursue legal action for their blatant disregard for the law.
I found out in XX/XX/XXXX I had judgement entered against me. I was not aware that judgement was entered in XXXX, I was never given court papers. It was explained to me I was served papers by substitution, that is not fair. I can not speak XXXX very well, but I was able to have a friend try to help me settle. They have raised the debt by way to much money and are not being cooperative in settling this debt for a fair amount, even though they never served me properly. I feel like I have been taken advantage of and now being forced to pay a large amount I can not afford.
Due to my financial hardship I was behind on my first and second mortgage payments. After some time, Green Tree, the servicer of my second mortgage got a judgement against me for the amount owed on the second mortgage in XX/XX/XXXX. They approached my employer and began wage garnishment in XX/XX/XXXX even though the house was still undergoing foreclosure review by the first mortgage company. The foreclosure sale of the property eventually took place on XX/XX/XXXX, two months after the wage garnishment had started.
I was reviewing my account and noticed some charges coming out of the account. I tried to dispute them and saw it wouldn't allow me to pull those up. I did some XXXX  and see that the funds were taken to be put into another account that my name was associated with for my ex-husband that I was informed I was removed off of many months ago. Due to this I am now out almost XXXX dollars and am absolutely disgusted that nothing was said to me before this action was taken. How very deceptive and sneaky of a company to do something like this to a customer of over 10 years.
Was called on my cell phone stating they had paperwork in order too sue on their desk. Also has called my phone 24 hrs later asking for my husband. I spoke to them on the phone stating that i did not know anything about this and I refused to give them anymore information. The person said then we will sue you.They also are claiming to sue my husband. It is my understanding that I am to be notified in mail if there is a pending suit, not by phone.
I was contacted by Wells Fargo regarding my loan which is less than one year old claiming they made a mistake on the taxes on my loan. Then I was told it was a property tax increase. I had opened a fixed loan and my payment was to remain at XXXX for 30 years. They claimed it was an escrow shortage now i am being asked to pay well over XXXX dollars. I am on a fixed income and this is not what I expected with a 30 year fixed FHA. 
Do I have the right to stick with the original contract.
I 've requested via online disputes as well as calling the credit bureaus to delete two incorrect and out dated address that are listed on my report. I in turn reach out to the said creditor to make sure they have my correct information and requested they update their records and they have assured me they have done so but the credit bureaus insists on still reporting the wrong info, please have them delete this incorrect information
I initially entered the last 4 of my social security to obtain rates offered by the company because of the claim that it would not impact my credit report. This was the only way, it seemed, to get a display of possible mortgage rates. Following this event someone called me. 

I made sure the first thing was to verify that My initial act did not impact my report and this was so verified by the banker who called. During our conversation I explained I only needed to ask questions. He verified some of my information and I asked him what was the purpose or difference since who was on the phone, because I'm only asking questions. He said to provide a rate he has to pull my credit report. I told him I was not ready to shop and did not want my report pulled. He proceeded by asking what was wrong with my report and why was I so concerned. I had to ask him not to try to sell me and if I needed anything I would call since I now have a number. On XX/XX/XXXX I received an alert that there was a hard inquiry which impacted my report by -8 points. 

When I logged in I saw it pulled by XXXX. I did not know who this was but only recalled speaking with QUICKEN LOANS. When I contacted them they said they did run my credit. I asked them to correct the error with the credit bureau because I did not authorize them to run my report and specifically requested they do NOT run my credit. 

The issue was escalated and I received a call on Monday XX/XX/XXXX from XXXX XXXX, Resolution Advocate. She said they were pulling the recording to investigate and would contact me with a resolution by Wednesday XX/XX/XXXX. 

XXXX XXXX Contacted me again on XX/XX/XXXX and confirmed that I was correct, and that she counted 5 times where I specifically requested he does not run my report. However, she also explained that because they have access to my personal information they can legally run my credit report. I explained I was never a client, I had no relationship with their company, I simply wanted questions answered and under these conditions I needed them to contact the credit bureau and have this inquiry reversed but she said there is nothing further that could be done since they had the right to run my report since they had my information, even with my request to not run it.
My identity was stolen and multiple account were opened in my name. I reached out to Barclay Bank Delaware to inform them of this issue but they did not want to remove the account. Instead they sent it to collections. I contacted the collection agency and the collection agency did nothing either.
American Medical Collection placed an erroneous item on my XXXX Credit report. I have disputed this item once and again today, XXXX XXXX, 2016, but TransUnion claims it was verified. I called this collection agency and encountered unprofessional customer service where the rep claimed she could not find the claim. Informed her that I have Medicare and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX -- what is not paid by Medicare is paid by XXXX. The rep hung up without assisting me. I called again after disputing with XXXX and, again, explained to the rep my medical insurance. She asked for my Medicare # and stated that she would bill Medicare. I demanded that she immediately remove this erroneous item from my XXXX report, and she laughed and stated that she would not. This is a {$120.00} XXXX charge that should not have been sent to the patient. In essence, American Medical Collection is committing Medicare fraud.
We deposited {$510.00} ( cash and check ) into a BB & T business checking account on XXXX XXXX, 2016 and have a copy of the receipt showing this - teller, as usual, counted the deposit as it was being made. Several days later, we received an 'account adjustment letter ' noting that the deposit was short by {$20.00} and that the funds had been withdrawn from the account as a result. I have been trying since XXXX XXXX to resolve this, with both the branch and BB & T, with no success. I did learn on XXXX XXXX that while we deposited {$430.00} cash and {$78.00} check, the teller showed it as {$410.00} cash and {$98.00} check - as there were clearly XXXX mistakes made by the teller in her paperwork, we feel it is clear that we are owed {$20.00}
i am filing another complaint so I can resolve the issue on all XXXX major credit report companies. I would like to get this resolved on my Transunion credit report. 

On my credit report, in the public record section it says I still owe XXXX dollars to a said cable company. I resolved this issue over a year ago. I left for XXXX and my wife went and paid the said company. Yet I still owe, and it is causing damage to my credit score. I would like to get this resolved and off my credit report. Thank you.
I currently have an issue with my student loan servicer Navient in the sense that they are trying to raise my interest and payments even though I have fixed 30 year interest and repayment schedule and I have never been late on my payment and have been making regular payments for over 12 years automatically deducted from my bank account every month on time. 

I 've contacted the loan service ( Navient ) and all they could tell me was they have looked at the contract and are increasing my payment, even though again, I have a fixed rate and have been paying on time.
Hello, I have a student loan with SallieMae. They keep giving me harassing phone calls. When I tried to make a resolution with them, they did not want to work one out for me. I explained to them that I am having a financial hardship at the moment, since my apartment was broken into two times. But, they did not want to hear it. Please advise or help me regarding this situation. Thank you. 

Sincerely, XXXX XXXX XXXX
According to the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) the consumer reporting companies role is to review the accuracy and completeness of any dispute by contacting the source ( creditor/s ) and to inform the creditor/s of all relevant information regarding consumer 's dispute. For over one year I have asked why the XXXX XXXX Account is being reported as an adverse account or an account that may be considered negative. The credit agencies have failed to address this very issue. The only responses received from the credit agencies are that the XXXX XXXX account is being reported accurately. 
I have written letters to XXXX XXXX asking why account is being reported as an adverse account or an account that may be considered negative. XXXX XXXX concluded that they have certified that account is reported accurately as open/current with no delinquencies. 
A letter from XXXX XXXX stated that their responsibility to their customers is to report accurate payment history and that they have no control over how the information is interpreted by the credit agencies. 
Why are the credit agencies insist on reporting XXXX XXXX Account as an adverse account or an account that may be considered negative? These credit agencies have yet to address why account is being reported in this manner. Reporting account as an adverse/account that may be considered negative is having a negative impact on credit scores. 
Items found under accounts that may be considered negative include late payments, charged off or sent to collections, bankruptcies, liens and judgments or account that are not necessarily negative, but that a potential creditor might want to review more closely. XXXX XXXX account does not fit any of these categories.
In the beginning of XX/XX/XXXX, I spoke with XXXX XXXX, my account manager and advised that Id received a check from my insurance company for roof damage and needed the correct process to get the check released as both my name and the mortgage company was listed. I was advised to start the " loss draft '' process. The first step was to send the check and insurance documents to a XXXX IL address, which was incorrect. A week later, I received a packet which instructed me to send the check and insurance documents to a XXXX Tx address which was done. I placed a follow up call on XX/XX/XXXX and was told by the same account manager that my documents were received and that I would need to send additional documentation as my claim is monitored due to default. I advised him that my payments are current ; which he agreed and stated that the system is showing the payment amounts in a suspended status. He explained that he had to reach out to the accounting department to have the payments applied. However, my loss draft claim/insurance check payment will be delayed as a result of the misapplied payment. In the interim, the repairs on my home are still in limbo-almost 2 months later. This is the 3rd time in less than a year that Ive had payment processing issues with Fay Servicing. Im not sure that this is legal. 
1.My ask is that my payments are updated in the system as expeditiously as they are withdrawn from my bank account. 
2. Please ensure that my insurance check is released within the 3 day period as with all good standing accounts ; which was outlined with my original documentation- 3. Please coach, teach and train your associates. " Im not in Loss Draft '' is never an acceptable response when a customer has an unresolved issue.
This was on my credit report years ago.. I wrote XXXX credit bureaus, XXXX.. I disputed owing this bill this bills years ago.. All XXXX credit bureau dismissed an removed this from my credit report. Now i am getting threating letters again from Convergent. Same bill XXXX I so not owe this bill. Please stop this. Stop the harrassing letters etc..