WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
innovis is reporting incorrect information on my reports.

1 ) XXXX account # XXXX 2 ) XXXX   XXXX XXXX XXXX # XXXX  3 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX account # XXXX  4 ) XXXX  account # XXXX 5 ) XXXX   XXXX account # XXXX  They are saying these account have been verified as belonging to me and none of them are my accounts. There is another person in the state of Oklahoma with similar social security number and same name that has been identified on my credit reports.
Sent information to put credit freeze on my report all they did was to remove my name from pre approved list, called the phone numbers given on the website but unable to get a real person. Company refused to initiate freeze online even though i answered all their questions correctly. Please help
I closed an account and the balance still showing on my credit for an amount of {$2300.00}. I would like this mistake to be fixed.
I set up a reduction rate payment plan with Navient on XX/XX/2018. They insist on asking you questions and getting detailed numbers on your entire life expenses before the person on the phone determines what your payment plan should be. I begged the Navient employee to help me with a payment that could be lower than {$400.00} because I am already paying another loan servicer $ XXXX and that will make me have to pay double rent every month. She said over and over again that my payment would have to be {$420.00} ( previously {$390.00} ) and they couldn't go any lower because " that's what the system will allow ''. So I eventually agreed and gave my debit card to have the money taken out ( they said I can only have the rate reduction program if they have my card information ). The first payment was scheduled to be taken out on XX/XX/XXXX but it wasn't and now I'm delinquent a payment. When I called today and spoke with XXXX, employee ID XXXX, she told me she couldn't do anything about it and my bank " didn't allow the payment ''. I begged her to bring my payment current and she said there's nothing she can do to help me lower my payment or bring me current.
I recently received a letter from Financial Asset Management Systems Inc in regards to a private student loans with XXXX XXXX. I am recently dealing with collection calls everyday where they are stating they are trying to collect a debt on a student loan. I recently contacted Department XXXX who looked up all student loans under my social security number. Department XXXX did not inform me of this so call XXXX loan with XXXX XXXX. Im in need of some assistant because this particular debt collector is telling me I owe them {$11.00}, XXXX which {$2700.00} are fees.
An erroneous credit inquiry was associated with my credit report. Because the algorithm that calculates FICO scores relies on the number of inquiries made in the prior 2 years, the erroneous inquiry negatively impacted my FICO score. The inquiry hit my credit report within 3 days of the incident. After faxing the request to remove the erroneous inquiry to Equifax as instructed, I am told it takes 60-90 days for the inquiry to be removed. According to XXXX, whom I worked with on this issue, " That is standard industry practice and there is no alternative. '' In the next 60 days I have to move. The erroneous hit on my credit report and resulting decline in my credit score will cost me money, as the score is used to determine the deposit required on a new apartment. Given the power of the FICO score, it is totally unreasonable for Equifax to take 60-90 days to remove an error when it takes less than a week from an incident for the error to appear. By comparison, it takes only 41 days for Equifax to report its corporate earnings for the entire year to shareholders -- a far more complex task than removing an error from a single individual 's credit report.
My loans were paid in full in XX/XX/XXXX, I thought I gave XXXX ample time to submit my account status as paid to credit bureaus, as I did not start inquiring until XXXX XXXX as to why they show " deferred '' with an outstanding balance of over {$130000.00}. Each time I am given the run-around. The last representative I spoke to in XXXX, emphasized with my position as this is hindering my ability to obtain new credit because of the high balances an assured me he would send in correct to the 3 bureaus. I called back last week on or around XX/XX/XXXX to inquire if my credit bureau had been correct. I was told by another representative that she saw the notes from the last phone call. She further stated I would need to send XXXX a letter disputing the debt they are reporting erroneously, along with a copy of a credit bureau that shows how the debt is reporting of which I did as requested. I called to check on if XXXX is in receipt of letter, I was told yes, but it will take a while. I am XXXX and need to purchase a lawnmower on credit so I can have a riding mower as I am unable to cut my grass with a push lawn mower now. I really need help getting this off my bureaus.
Debt is not mineDescribe what happened so we can understand the issue ... 

I have received a XXXX point reduction in my credit score from Equfax. When I got my score XX/XX/XXXX it was XXXX XX/XX/XXXX it is XXXX. When I reviewed my credit report I found that XXXX had reported me as having a bill of {$340.00}. I have never received a bill from XXXX and since they put me into collection And have never received a bill from them ( XXXX.. ) This bill is showing as XXXX year old. If I had received a bill from either one I would have paid it immediately. I have always paid all of my bills on time. I Called XXXX who. Referred me to XXXX. I called covergent who sent me back to XXXX. XXXX said I would have to go to the collection agency because they can no longer send an itemized bill, when calling XXXX again they said they did n't have one but I should pay it anyway. Why would I pay a bill that I never received and did n't know what it was for. I finally filed a dispute with Equifax and explained that I never received an itemized bill from either XXXX or XXXX. The answer to my disputewas " It was my bill. " That, of course did not answer my problem. I am sure that you would not pay a bill that gave you a number but not itemized and did not know what it was for. I have been given the runaround enough. 

I called XXXX XX/XX/XXXX because I wanted to unlock my phone ''. I could n't unlock my phone unless I knew I had a XXXX balance '' and was told by the billing department that I had a XXXX balance and my account was current. I ca n't understand why they would now say this. 
XXXX XXXX
I opened a credit card several years ago with no annual or membership fees but was recently charged a {$19.00} membership fee that I never agreed to. When I called to have it waived they refused to do so and claim it was in the original terms of the account but it was certainly not. This is the first time it was charged after having the account for approximately 5 years so I clearly did not agree to this.
A company called NetSpend has twice sent me a debit card in the mail that I did not ask for. From what I understand, they gather people 's personal information, create a debit account in their name, and send them a debit card in the mail. The debit card had a phone number to call to activate the card, but said to just ignore the offer if I did not want it. It bothers me that a company opened a financial account in my name that I did not ask for. No, I did not activate the card, but I believe they would have had to create an account beforehand to be able to send me a card in the mail that was ready to be activated. I think this practice should be illegal. And I believe that it could increase identity fraud if there are financial accounts being created in my name that I am not aware of.
Repayment status since XX/XX/XXXX, IBR payment {$0.00} + PSLF enrollment. 
I was put into an un-requested administrative forbearance in XX/XX/XXXX due to Chapter XXXX notification : qualifying PSLF payments are not being counted for this time frame and another time frame in from XX/XX/XXXX to XX/XX/XXXX due to employment change. XXXX got the certification from BOTH employers, there was no break in employment. 

The Mass. Attorney General Sued XXXX XX/XX/XXXX for : For borrowers on track for PSLF, the lawsuit alleges that XXXX XXXX   engaged in a variety of activities ( such as paperwork delays and erroneous determinations ) that forced people into forbearance instead of qualifying PSLF payments, or it failed to properly count qualifying PSLF payments. These actions caused thousands of PSLF-eligible borrowers to be in repayment far longer than they otherwise would need to be under the program.
I paid my mortage for XX/XX/XXXX through Bank of America online banking portal on my computer. I received a phone call on XX/XX/XXXX for the first time from XXXX stating they had not received my XXXX mortgage. I spoke with a representative and stated the mortgage was paid on XX/XX/XXXX on online banking through Bank of America. I then pulled up my Bank of America and saw they sent my payment to XXXX XXXX, my husband 's car loan company. I explained that Bank of America made an error. The representative from XXXX called Bank of America and we had a 3 way phone conference call and Bank of America refused to acknowledge their error and couldn't get XXXX the money due to it had been sent to XXXX XXXX. I was unemployed at the time and did not have money in my savings or checking account neither did my husband to cover an immediate payment to XXXX. I then had to call XXXX XXXX XXXX with my husband, and had a discussion in which XXXX XXXX said they would have to mail back the check to my husband and it would take 7 to 10 business days. XXXX was also on this 3 way conference call. I was informed from XXXX due to the error there would be no late payments. I was also informed our credit report would not be contacted for late payment. I was informed due to the XXXX and XXXX XXXX holiday, XXXX XXXX couldn't guarantee the check would be to us before XX/XX/XXXX. The check arrived on XX/XX/XXXX and XXXX was paid on XX/XX/XXXX after the check had cleared. I also paid our XX/XX/XXXX mortgage payment before XX/XX/XXXX. On XX/XX/XXXX even though all of this information was made a record of on my account I began receiving harassing phone calls from XXXX about my XX/XX/XXXX mortgage payment and received them the next month on XX/XX/XXXX. Also, our credit report was lowered because XXXX reported that our mortgage payment was over 30 days late even though I have never been late on a mortgage payment and XXXX had a record of what happened to our XX/XX/XXXX mortgage. I had a dispute with XXXX and called XXXX who will not take down this late payment stating that legally XXXX had to report this late payment and that the only way XXXX will correct the dispute is if Bank of America sends them something in writing stating their mistake. Bank of America won't acknowledge the mistake since it was done on their website. This incident is one of many problems I have had with XXXX where one time I paid our escrow off at the end of the year otherwise our mortgage payment would have gone significantly higher due to our escrow being short for the next year. I put a payment coupon and put the check stated this was for correction of escrow and XXXX applied this payment to our mortgage instead of the escrow. It took my 4 phone calls each lasting an hour and a half to straighten out their mistake. Also, I have up until the XXXX of the month before my mortgage is late but if you pay after the XXXX of the month XXXX calls your payment a remittance payment. This payment is not a remittance payment since legally I have until the XXXX of the month grace period to pay my mortgage without a penalty.
After checking my credit reports I noticed a debt collection from Convergent Outsourcing , INC . I have written to this company for them to supply me validation of said debt. I received a bill. I have never had a contract with this company. I wrote to them again about this matter and have received no response.
Over the past seven years, I have diligently repaid my federal Direct Subsidized and Unsubsidized student loans each month. I have never missed a payment. I have stayed in good contact with my service provider. I have never deferred or been in forbearance. When I can, I pay more than what I owe each month in a sisyphean attempt to repay my loans faster. 

In those seven years, my service provider has changed at least three times. Currently, both of my loans are serviced by Navient. 

At every turn, Navient has been unhelpful, rude, cruel and has made it as hard as possible to make payments, to reach them, to ask simple questions and to get crucial information about my loans. Currently, they refuse to accept a payment via debit card, over the phone or on their website. The flimsy reason they offer is that my account does not have an outstanding balance, though I should be able to repay my loans at any time and in any amount, regardless of what is outstanding. I should never be punished for making payments on time every month. They also refuse to allow me to apply my overpayment directly to the principal balance, or to XXXX loan specifically, as is my right. It feels illegal, icky and wrong. 

In light of the lawsuit filed on XXXX XXXX, 2017 by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau for " failing borrowers at every turn, '' I would like to share my experience in the hope that it strengthens your suit against this vile company, who feeds off the misfortune and ignorance of XXXX 's educated young people. I will call your attention, specifically, to this paragraph from the press release regarding your lawsuit : " [ Navient ] Fails to correctly apply or allocate borrower payments to their accounts : As soon as a borrower begins to pay back their loans, student loan servicers are supposed to take a borrower 's payment and follow instructions from the borrower about how to apply it across their multiple loans. Navient repeatedly misapplies or misallocates payments -- often making the same error multiple times over many months. The company all too often fails to correct its errors unless a consumer discovers the problem and contacts the company. '' I am XXXX of the borrowers they have failed in this regard and I want out. Immediately. I want them to be held responsible for failing me and others like me and I want my loans serviced by a company that does not prey upon its customers like lions on weakened gazelle. 

Given the atrocious level of service provided, the pending CFPB lawsuit, the current-good standing of my loan status and my impeccable credit score, I have formally requested to change service providers through the Ombudsman of the Department of Education. Though, I 'm sure there will be a XXXX reasons why I do not have the right to make that choice. 

Please take Navient to court and represent all of us.
I have had XXXX for my mortgage for 4 years. Last month, they switched over to XXXX XXXX. My payments were always {$1600.00}. Payments were up to date with XXXX. 

XXXX XXXX sent me my first statement in XX/XX/XXXX up-charging me {$480.00} additional. My initial call was XX/XX/18 to see where the additional charge was coming from. No-one that I spoke to for several calls could tell me the reason for the up-charge and where that money is coming from. I paid the overcharge to avoid late fees and so they would not hurt my credit. I have called over 8 times in a months time period and still have not received any answers. On XX/XX/18 with my initial call I requested an escrow analysis which I was told would be complete in 2 weeks. As of XX/XX/XXXX, the analysis is still not completed which is 6 weeks later. I have provided XXXX with all proofs of House insurance and Tax information. It has been over a month of phone calls, email, and sending them proof and I still can not get an answer to where this additional payment they want every month is coming from. 

I am also receiving 2-3 robo calls from their company daily to refinance or to take out more money in a loan.
I filed a XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX of XXXX And both navient accounts were supposed to be XXXX however it never did and sent both accounts to collections I tried talking to navient but they were only interested charging me full price which far exceeds original loan amounts Also the loans were originally under XXXX XXXX before becoming navient the account originally went negative in XXXX when I went to XXXX XXXX service As being over 7 years of initial negativity Both accounts should be removed from my 3 credit reports they also filed a lot of misinformation in my file
i been paying this sence XXXX i asked them to send bill. they said no. just send money. they wont send a bill but will add interest and late charges. i dont know how much i owe anymore. it 's been along time.
I wanted to pay off my mortgage by XX/XX/18. Some of the payoff funds came from various XXXX XXXX Bill Pay payments. 

On XX/XX/18 I called PennyMac to find out what my payoff amount would be and I was given the amount and told I would need to send the final payment as a wire transfer. I made the wire transfer and assumed everything was fine. 

Unfortunately one of the XXXX XXXX Bill payments arrived on XX/XX/18 and they wouldn't take responsibility for any extra interest or MIP payments this caused. Although this seems to be in conflict with XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX  Bill Pay Guarantee, I am not filing a complaint about it. 

My problem is that PennyMac says that my loan wasn't satisfied until XX/XX/18, an additional 8 days later, and sent me an escrow account overages check that is considerably less than it should be. When I asked for an accounting of my funds they said I needed to refer to their website loan account information. However, for the past month there has been so much confusion and misappropriation of my payments on their website that I do not trust their accounting. I imagine they expect me to just take them at their word that my refund is correct. I don't! 

I want a concise accounting of when they received my funds, what my funds were applied to and why they say my loan wasn't satisfied for an additional 8 days.
I recently froze my XXXX report, and have received verification that my report has an activity freeze on it. I contacted XXXX & Experian credit reporting agencies on XXXX different occasions, and asked them to verify a public record of bankruptcy on my credit report. They sent a reply stating that it was verified through XXXX, which is untruthful.
Equifax recently reported a negative item on my credit report for XXXX. This item was discovered on XX/XX/XXXX. It is the credit reporting agency 's responsibility to ensure Reasonable procedures. Section 602 for the Fair Credit Reporting Act clearly outlines this responsibility It is the purpose of this title to require that consumer reporting agencies adopt reasonable procedures for meeting the needs of commerce for consumer credit, personnel, insurance, and other information in a manner which is fair and equitable to the consumer, with regard to the confidentiality, accuracy, relevancy, and proper utilization of such information in accordance with the requirements of this title. XXXX Agreed to remove any negative information from my credit reports. In turn, it appears that XXXX removed the negative information from XXXX and XXXX, however newly reported this item to Equifax. Equifax is a consumer reporting agency and in accordance with 611. Procedure in case of disputed accuracy [ 15 U.S.C. 1681i ] of the Fair Credit Reporting Act credit reporting agencies have a responsibility is to report information the is 100 % Accurate 100 % Complete and 100 % Verifiable. If in fact Equifax were following these procedures, this information would have been verified with the company ; prior to placing this information on my credit report. This information was not verified ; because if it in fact was verified ; XXXX would have told them that they should not be reporting this negative tradeline. You have a responsibility as per section 611. Procedure in case of disputed accuracy [ 15 U.S.C. 1681i ] to treat Inaccurate or Unverifiable Information accordingly. I have outlined this below : Treatment of Inaccurate or Unverifiable Information ( A ) In general. If, after any reinvestigation under paragraph ( 1 ) of any information disputed by a consumer, an item of the information is found to be inaccurate or incomplete or can not be verified, the consumer reporting agency shall- ( i ) promptly delete that item of information from the file of the consumer, or modify that item of information, as appropriate, based on the results of the reinvestigation ; and ( ii ) promptly notify the furnisher of that information that the information has been modified or deleted from the file of the consumer. Furthermore, if this item appeared on my credit report in the past ; the following steps were not taken to reinsert this item to my report. ( ii ) Notice to consumer. If any information that has been deleted from a consumer 's file pursuant to subparagraph ( A ) is reinserted in the file, the consumer reporting agency shall notify the consumer of the reinsertion in writing not later than 5 business days after the reinsertion or, if authorized by the consumer for that purpose, by any other means available to the agency. I have attached a copy of the BBB complaint where the company agreed to remove any and all negative listings from my credit report.
Dear Sir or Madame, The purpose of this communication is to file a formal complaint against Equifax. I have repeatedly asked for evidence to support their reporting, but they have failed to provide me with a copy of viable evidence submitted by the following collection agencies reporting fraudulent collection accounts in my credit files. 

1 ) XXXX XXXX - Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance - {$150.00} 2 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX - Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance -  {$320.00} 3 ) XXXX XXXX XXXX - Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance - {$120.00} Unfortunately, after not receiving any responses from the collection agencies reporting erroneous collection accounts on my credit reports. I disputed these accounts on three separate occasions with all 3 credit bureau 's by mail ( Certified mail return receipt requested ) requesting the following : 1 ) Investigation of the fraudulent collection accounts 2 ) " Burden of Proof '' Documentation bearing my signature, verifying that these accounts belong to me 3 ) " Fraud Alert '' be placed in my credit files with my phone number asking that goods or services not be extending without first contacting me personally and verifying all application information. 

Thankfully, XXXX  and XXXX abided by the " Fair Credit Reporting Act '' by working with me in a collective manner to rectify these fraudulent collection accounts ultimately deleting them from my credit files. However, I have little to no responses from Equifax in providing me with the " burden of proof '' or status of my investigation/re-investigation results within a timely manner. Most importantly, in my third written communication to all three Bureau 's I submitted a police report, a letter requesting a Fraud alert be placed on my file and a re-investigation of the fraudulent collection accounts. 

Therefore, I will be providing all supporting documentation to support my claim and attempts to communicate effectively with Equifax and the collection agencies regarding this matter. Lastly, I am asking for you to intervene for a fair judgment based on the Violation of The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act and The Fair Credit Reporting Act ( including but not limited to Section 623. ) and have any inaccuracies removed from my credit report.