WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
From XX/XX/XXXX until XX/XX/XXXX we lived in XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX, Texas and we signed a 6 month lease that was set to expire XX/XX/XXXX. Upon 3 days after our move-in we noticed that our building had a roach infestation and we asked them to take care of the matter. The apartment allegedly scheduled for an exterminator to come spray our unit for the roaches. However every time the exterminator came the problem worsened and we were told it was part of the process. We endured this problem every day of our lease as roaches were coming out of appliances, crackes/crevices in the wall, outside, etc. and we demanded that they fix the issue immediately. The roaches were not only a health hazard but the chemicals that they exterminator would use for their " roach clean out '' made it difficult for my wife to breathe whenever she was in the unit. Failure for them to repair the issue left us no choice but to end the lease in XXXX and Texas law states that landlords have a responsibility to ensure their property does not affect a residents health or safety. After all of the certified mail and emails we sent them they did not fix our issue and the day before we moved our apartment flooded in both of the bedrooms of our apartment and they did not fix it. Now they have hired Phoenix Recovery Group to collect an amount that we do not owe and we went to court and a take nothing judgment was granted. They have been reporting negative information on our credit reports for the past 8 months and they are going against a judge 's judgement and it is making it borderline impossible to rent another home.
Here is a copy of the complaint mailed to Capital One. 

On XXXX/XXXX/16 I disputed my charge with XXXX XXXX XXXX. I received two secure messages regarding the dispute, almost immediately. Printed copies are enclosed. 
On XXXX/XXXX/16, I received another secure message advising, verbatim - Unless the merchant resubmits the charge within 45 days of the date of this letter, we consider your case closed. If this occurs, we 'll notify you and may re-bill your account for the amount of the credit. Please keep all documentation related to this dispute for 90 days. Again, a printed copy is enclosed. 
On XXXX/XXXX/16, we received another message, stating that the merchant resubmitted the charge, with proof. Here is where the problems arise. 
XXXX/XXXX/16 through XXXX/XXXX/16 is 73 days. 52 Business days. This was WELL beyond the 45 days, so I initiated an online chat on XXXX/XXXX/16 to find out why. I chatted with XXXX. I asked outright - what date did the merchant rebill the charge. He said I was rebilled on XXXX/XXXX/16. I reiterated, asking if XXXX/XXXX/16 was the actual date. He said yes. I explained the issue. With that, the chat ended fairly quickly - printed copy enclosed. 
On XXXX/XXXX/16 I received mailed letter of documentation from Capital one. All correspondence is dated XXXX postage stamp is dated XXXX/XXXX/16. Unfortunately, the rebuttal from XXXX XXXX XXXX is all dated XXXX/XXXX/16. 
I was advised, as written above, if this occurs, we 'll notify you and may re-bill your account for the amount of the credit. 
Is your turn around time normally 63 days, 45 working days from the merchant 's response? Is that how it works? If so, why do you claim 45 days from date of this letter?
I had a fraudulent purchase on my discover card at XXXX. I filed police reports and the police indicated that I was scammed through a known scam. I provided this information to discover card and informed them I was not paying the fraudulent charges. I provided a follow up letter when they refused to stop harassing me. I sent this letter asking them to stop contacting me by return receipt certified mail, return signature receipt, in XX/XX/2018. I received the return receipt showing they signed for the letter on XX/XX/2018. Discover card agents have called me repeatedly since that time. I mailed another letter to them telling them not to contact me. This was also sent by certified mail, signature required.
Bank of America is giving out complete bank account numbers, along with complete routing numbers on their automated telephone system, when a payment is being made. This can compromise not only the credit card, if stolen, but also the person 's bank account. Per the Fair and Accurate Credit Transaction Act of 2003 : Section 605 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( 15 U.S.C. 1681c ) is amended by adding at the end the following : '' ( g ) TRUNCATION OF CREDIT CARD AND DEBIT CARD NUMBERS. -- '' ( 1 ) IN GENERAL. -- Except as otherwise provided in this subsection, no person that accepts credit cards or debit cards for the transaction of business shall print more than the last XXXX digits of the card number or the expiration date upon any receipt provided to the cardholder at the point of the sale or transaction. 
So, anyone who accepts credit cards can only print the last XXXX digits on the receipt, but Bank of America can give complete routing numbers and bank account numbers on an automated phone system, to anyone?? This makes no sense all at. I 've been told by XXXX agents and XXXX supervisors that my checking account number has been changed to all XXXX, but when I checked this on the automated phone system, it gave me my complete bank account number, Again!! I have had to close this bank account and open another account to protect the security of my account. This cost me {$10.00} for the shipping and handling of the new checks, which I can not afford!! All because Bank of America changed their system about 4 or 5 months ago, to give complete bank account numbers now, not just the last XXXX digits of the account number, This puts XXXX of their customers who pay their credit cards over the phone at risk of having their bank account information compromised. This is NOT OK!! It has cost me a lot of time and now also money, because they will not do anything about it. A secondary issue is that I had a CREDIT balance on my credit card of {$12.00}, which I kept there because I now have no way to pay my credit card bill without it costing me money, and I wanted to keep account active, It is a XXXX points card, and they will keep the XXXX plus points on the card, I will use the points, and then close the card. I charged {$2.00} on my card, to be taken from my credit balance, and now my card has a balance on it of {$2.00}, My credit balance had gone away, It seems, without my knowledge, consent or permission, they have sent a refund check for this amount, Not received yet, I had to go to the merchant that I charged to {$2.00}, have them refund the card, and I then paid cash for this, Please Help!!
I applied for a Home Depot XXXX XXXX XXXX and was declined due to a Bankruptcy from XXXX. 
I spoke to several credit analysts at Citi, XXXX of which was a senior credit analyst who recommended that the application be approved. I was promised a call back with in 72 hours, of which I never received. It took me over 1 hour to get in though with someone from there credit department who was able to take a look at my application ( of which they spend XXXX seconds in and then to a manager who spent less that XXXX minute in ). I have other cards with Citi that I have now had for over 4 years that have XXXX lines. I have nearly XXXX in available credit. The manager said that my overall utilization was to high. According to my credit reports I am using less that 25 % of my available credit which is considered to be low utilization. 

I do not believe I was treated fairly. I believe the analysts seen that I had a BK and was simply done reviewing the application and giving it proper consideration.
XXXX XXXX XXXX is reporting a closed account as open. The account is a old account and should be removed. 
XXXX charged off this account back in XXXX XXXX XXXX and is reaging this account to show a negative account on my Equifax, XXXX reports. Every month they 're aging the account to show a current delinquency on a charged off account. The amount charged off was {$19000.00}. I have tried to resolve this matter numerous times with XXXX to report this properly by removing this account. XXXX continues to inaccurately report data on a charged off closed account by reaging it. This is a violation under FCRA.
My Mortgage company affected my credit negatively. I applied for a loan modification because times got tough for me. I went around and around with BOA and many lies and many diseptive methods used to avoid modifing my loan. They refused my payments until I was placed into a position over the three month of non payment. I sent them a letter that I sent to the governor of Florida once they did this and immediately they decided they they approved my loan modification. After 4 years of XXXX, lies and absolute despection I do have my home and yes they modified it to a lower monthly payment but it 's not without a bittersweet note. They changed the terms to 40 years and now my credit has been compromised. I need help and would like to know what can and could be done. Please help.
Nationstar has been making mistakes in managing my escrow for almost two years. It appears that Nationstar has manipulated my escrow account- by reducing payments one year and increasing another year- in order to justify the increase in escrow payments and creating an escrow shortage. Such escrow increases are illegal in California because my expenses have not changed. For years my payments have been as follows : real estate taxes {$10000.00}, hazard insurance {$760.00}, and flood insurance {$1900.00}. I provided the latest policies to the VP of customer services. 

XX/XX/XXXX, Nationstar paid only {$370.00} for my hazard insurance, below the required amount. 

XX/XX/XXXX, Nationstar paid {$920.00}, above the required amount. Immediately after this exaggerated payment, Nationstar followed up with an increase in escrow. 

Nationstar 's mishandling of my escrow account has caused me significant hardship. Nationstar knew that I was struggling after the rate increase XX/XX/XXXX, when I submitted a request for loan modification, which was rejected. Nationstar knew I was struggling, and yet they manipulated my escrow account in order to force upon me another increase, in total XXXX % increase in one year, in an attempt to force me into foreclosure. This appears to be a pattern for Nationstar : for customers in trouble, after a rate hike follow up with another increase in escrow. I found many such instances on XXXX. 

Regarding my escrow account, I want to take over and manage my own expenses : it will be simpler and more efficient for Nationstar. Prior to Nationstar, I have been making payments to XXXX XXXX for 6 years, always on time, never missed a payment.
have sent 2 certified letters asking all credit reporting agencies to VALIDATED ( not a verification ) this account with proof of the Certified copy of the TRUE BILL ( not a statement ) and copies of Original documents with my ( Wet Seal Signature ) on them nothing has been sent to me showing the account was VALIDATED or Original Documents showing my Wet Seal Signature with certified copies of the TRUE BILL ( not a statement or a verification ) I Now Demand these request to be placed on file that I have requested these items that have been ignored the credit agencies told me that they closed the cl as I'm stating it had nothing to do with them the account was valid I NEED THE ACCOUNT TO BE VALIDATED, WET SEAL SIGNATURE SHOWN ON ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS AND A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE TRUE BILL to be sent to me i was told it was left up to the company to send you that I never received that information that was requested and the creditor closed the case as completed and VALIDATED this creditor also needs to update the address on accounts to XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX California XXXX
I have a loan with WFHM. I have always made my payments on time. For some reason I realized that there was a late payment on my credit report. As you can see, I have always had a stellar payment record with this company. I tried contacting both XXXX, XXXX  and WFHM with no successful resolution. XXXX and XXXX were reporting me late. There was definitely an error on their part. I was never 30 days late XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX.
Transunion is showing a collection that is two years and it is invalid. I disputed the charge and the company removed it from XXXX. Further, they are artificially lowering my credit score due to inquiries and percentage of outstanding credit used, even though the amount is miniscule compared to my income. This has damaged me by causing a higher interest rate on the loans I am attempting to get.
Sears Account XXXX Account inquires XXXX XXXX made at Sears, XXXX, XXXX, XXXX, OK XXXX XXXX Item XXXX Made payment on XX/XX/XXXX for XX/XX/XXXX bill that was due XX/XX/XXXX Item XXXX Made payment on XX/XX/XXXX for XX/XX/XXXX bill that was due XX/XX/XXXX Item XXXX Made payment on XX/XX/XXXX for XX/XX/XXXX bill that was due XX/XX/XXXX Item XXXX payment was applied to XX/XX/XXXX bill not to the XX/XX/XXXX bill. Item XXXX payment bill has a statement that I did n't make the XX/XX/XXXX payment. XX/XX/XXXX @ XXXX I called Account Inquires, spoke to Princes, I was informed that the XX/XX/XXXX payment was applied to my XX/XX/XXXX bill. I asked that the XX/XX/XXXX payment be applied to XX/XX/XXXX bill. The options I was given was a removal of late payment fee or the refund of the {$50.00} XX/XX/XXXX payment. I told Princes, that I did n't want that because my credit report would still reflect a no payment in XX/XX/XXXX. Princes connect me to the supervisor, XXXX, who gave same options. I informed her that the current system of payment in store should be updated. The system does n't tell you that you are making a duplicate payment and give you the option to opt out of the payment. The current system will cause the customer 's credit rating to be negatively impacted because you will have a " no payment '' on your credit report that is false. This will reduce your credit score in a fraudulent way.
American Express Prepaid Card was issued to me for {$1000.00} as a reimbursement for flight cancellation. The card represents Prepaid Rewards, ( a ), there is no reward program for use of the card as advertised, ( b ), when I attempted to utilize the card to pay the outstanding balance on my American Express Credit Card ( 30 year card holder ), it was refused. Clearly, for each transaction I charge on the non-reward prepaid card ( advertised as a reward card ), I loose rewards on the credit card which has rewards. Further, where the card is prepaid ( funds on deposit with American Express Bank ), the movement of the funds from one account to another has no risk and no expense. By forcing the use of the prepaid card with merchants there is an expense to the consumer ( me ), with no reward benefit as ascribed to the credit card. Pursuant to the Prepaid Card Rules this is a violation of the rules in both respects. The inter-lata transfer at the same bank from one account to another for a consumer is requisite. It is clear if the prepaid card is drawn on another bank, the non issuing bank does not have the responsibility to accept the funds on the prepaid card for deposit. However, at the same bank movement of funds inter-lata is required. I spoke with American Express and requested escalation to the supervisor and received the same denial. Prepaid Card number XXXX XXXX XXXX - Credit Card Number XXXX XXXX both American Express.
I opened a checking and savings accounts with Fifth Third Bank on XX/XX/2017. I have made a few cash deposits and two check deposits. Both checks were from my employer who banks with XXXX bank the checks are drawn on an account from there. The first check for XXXX cleared no problem the second for XXXX has been placed on hold. I deposited the check in question on XX/XX/2017 they want to hold the funds until XX/XX/2017. The reason they claim to be doing this is because of my account being new. I have already spoke to my employer and there is no problem what so ever on their end the check has already cleared their bank. The is no logical reason for the hold.
I CALLED IN TO NEGOTIATE A SETTLEMENT THE ENTIRE STAFF IS UNPROFESSIONAL THE FIRST PERSON I SPOKE WITH HAD TO LOOK ME UP BY LAST NAME 3 TIMES CALL TIME ALREADY AT FIVE MINUTES SHE MADE A SMART COMMENT BECAUSE I PHONETICALLY PROVIDED THE SPELLING YET THE OTHER TIMES SHE HAD NOT FOUND IT AND IMMEDIATELY THREATENED THAT SHE WOULD TERMINATE CALL SHE THEN FAILING TO PROVIDE HER NAME AFTER MY REQUEST AS SHE WANTED TO PREVENT HER NAME BEING MENTIONED IN ANY TYPE OF COMPLAINTS SAID SHE WOULD PASS ME TO XXXX IM ASSUMING HER FRIEND IN HOPES THAT XXXX TOO WOULD SHARE IN HER DISDAIN FOR ME I ASKED XXXX FOR THE PREVIOUS REPS NAME AND SHE RFSD TO PROVIDE I TOLD HER THAT THE REP HAD BEEN NASTY TO ME AND SHE THEN HUNG UP I CALLED BACK AND WAS THEN TRANSFERRED TO XXXX WHO IMMEDIATELY HAD A BIASED OPINION BECAUSE OF THE NOTES BY XXXX SHE THEN TOLD ME I WOULD ONLY QUALIFY FOR A 20 % OFF OF THE BALANCE AS A SETTLEMENT. I ADVISED HER THAT THIS RESPONSE WAS ONLY PROVIDED BECAUSE OF MY PREVIOUS CONVERSATION AND THAT THIS WAS DISCRIMINATORY IN NATURE SHE THEN SAID IF I PAID THE SETTLEMENT SHE WOULD NOT REMOVE THIS ITEM FROM MY CREDIT AT THAT POINT SHE HAD BROKEN THE FDCPA AND I ADVISED HER THAT SHE WAS TREADING DOWN A SLIPPERY SLOPE AS I AM AN INFORMED CONSUMER AND THEN SHE SAID I CAN NO LONGER HAVE A SETTLEMENT AND I COULD NO LONGER PAY AND THIS WOULD REMAIN ON MY CREDIT FOREVER AND TERMINATED THE CALL YET AGAIN. I AM MAKING THIS COMPLAINT AS THIS ILLEGAL ACT AND PREVENTION OF ME REMOVING THIS FROM MY CREDIT SHOULD BE PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE AND THE LEADERSHIP TEAM OF THIS COMPANY SHOULD BE AWARE OF THE ILLEGAL VERBIAGE IN THE USE OF THEIR COLLECTORS AS WELL AS THE FACT LETS FACE IT THEY REFUSED THE MONEY ISNT THAT THE SOLE PURPOSE OF A COLLECTION AGENCY I HOPE THAT CREDITORS THINKING OF PLACING THEIR BUSINESS WITH THIS COMPANY WILL SEE THIS COMPLAINT AND THINK TWICE I WILL ALSO BE FILING COMPLAINTS WILL THE OTHER AGENCIES PROTECTING MY RIGHTS IE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND CFPB
Experian has incorrect personal information to my credit report. Someone much have a name similar to my name the name and DOB is incorrect please remove anything that is associated with that name and DOB XXXX XXXX/INCORRECT/DELETE XX/XX/XXXX INCORRECT/ DELETE
Upon direction of Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc, XXXX Bank, XXXX XXXX, has been illegally attempting to collect a mortgage debt for the past 2.5 years and has engaged in multiple instances of fraudulent misrepresentation to both me, the state and appellate courts of Ohio, and to the United States Sixth Circuit Federal Court. Specifically, the Bank, by and through its attorneys, alleged that it is the new trustee in the case by virtue of being the successor in interest to XXXX XXXX XXXX. As a result of those false statements, the bank then stated to the courts that it was the 'real party in interest ' in my case. In addition, XXXX Bank itself wrote me a letter ( attached ) in XX/XX/XXXX stating that it was the 'trustee ' for the 'trust ' that owns my note and mortgage. None of the statements above, both made in court and made to me, were true at the time they were made, and they are still not true today. The evidence of their falsity is readily apparent by means of a fraudulent 'Corporate Assignment of Mortgage ' that was filed by Select Portfolio Servicing , INC , the servicing agent on the account. The assignment, which was prepared on XX/XX/XXXX, contains a number of contradictions that prove that the statements made prior to that date were false. In addition, further statements that were made after XX/XX/XXXX are also false since they assignment failed to transfer any 'interests ' to XXXX Bank as they alleged in court documents. XXXX Bank, in addition to committing fraud upon the Courts, is in direct violation of the Consent Decree it signed with the OCC in XXXX, XXXX. Article IV ( 1 ) ( e ) of the Compliance Program, signed by the bank on XX/XX/XXXX, requires the bank to establish and maintain : ( e ) processes to ensure that the Bank has properly documented ownership of the promissory note and mortgage ( or deed of trust ) under applicable state law, or is otherwise a proper party to the action ( as a result of agency or other similar status ) at all stages of foreclosure and bankruptcy litigation, including appropriate transfer and delivery of endorsed notes and assigned mortgages or deeds of trust at the formation of a residential mortgage- backed security, and lawful and verifiable endorsement and successive assignment of the note and mortgage or deed of trust to reflect all changes of ownership ; ( emphasis added ) All of the above requirements imposed by the OCC detailed above have been violated. As of XX/XX/XXXX, XXXX Bank has filed a new praecipe of sale as part of its ongoing fraudulent scheme to literally steal my home under false pretenses. I filed in state court on XX/XX/XXXX the attached new motion to vacate the summary judgment due to fraud on the court and 'any other reasons justifying relief ', but it was incorrectly denied on XX/XX/XXXX due to 'res judicata XXXX XXXX
XXXX XXXX - XXXX XXXX {$790.00} Account was not verified as according to law ; no documents were sent. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681g I have the right to demand that the credit reporting agency disclose to me all of the documents that have been recorded and retained in your file at the time of this request concerning the accounts that you are reporting in my credit report. It was responded to my request saying that these accounts have been verified. There were no copies of the documents that the credit agency has in their files sent to me. 
You do not have any documentation in your files to verify the accuracy of the disputed account, please delete them immediately as required under Section 611 ( a ) ( 5 ) ( A ) ( i ). By publishing these inaccurate and unverified items on my credit report and distributing them to 3rd parties you are damaging my reputation and credit worthiness. 
Under the FCRA 15 U.S.C. 1681i, all unverified accounts must be promptly deleted. Therefore, the credit agency was unable to provide me with a copy of the verifiable proof that for the account listed below within 30 days of XX/XX/2016 please remove accounts from my credit report.