WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
I have several accounts in my Equifax file that does not make any sense im filing a complaint on each one individualy detailing my concern with supporting documentation to back up my complaint. First i will start off with XXXX XXXX this account was a checkin account and went negative in XX/XX/XXXX. It was reported to XXXX and fell off my XXXX report after 5 years. This was never a payment account or credit account it was a bounce check that caused overdrfts fees that exceeded XXXX altho my report reflects positive payment history followed by a charge off in XXXX XXXX. This info is incorect and has been close to 7 years reporting inacurate outdated info. Also this account has been paid in full as of XXXX XXXX it still reflects a balance.
My XXXX report lists a collection from 2015, with no information, and no other account showing as a write off or collection as it 's source. This is not my debt.
I am being sued by  XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  for a time-barred debt in the amount of {$4100.00}. They have filed a lawsuit in  XXXX   XXXX  TX case #  XXXX . I was never notified by them that they were filing a lawsuit. They are also reporting this time-barred debt to  XXXX . This debt was charged off by  OneMain Financial i n  XXXX    XXXX  .
First off, this is a predatory lender offering quasi-payday loans. 

It has lied in its response to CFPB : " Let 's start from the beginning, borrower has not responded to a single call or email EVER. '' You never responded to my e-mails about Alabama usury law. Company only kept trying to debit a closed bank account, causing NSFs. 

" A loan was taken out in the amount of {$2000.00}, fully explained the rate and terms. '' A bald-faced lie! This was a bait and switch process. Terms only divulged when the loan was finalized. 

" Under Alabama Law, only loans under {$2000.00} are covered by usury. Our Alabama license allows Argon to charge the rate we choose depending on borrowers credit. '' I have a Phd in law. Please reread the law -- up to {$2000.00}. Of course, scammers know best. 

" Adding up all the payments borrower has made equals {$1900.00}, less than the initial balance. she has {$75.00} in unpaid NSF, and {$120.00} in unpaid late fees. '' Bald-faced liar, again. The principal of the loan has been paid. 

" Not sure how she believes this is paid off, even if we were to give her an 8 % rate she would owe more than {$2000.00}. '' What kind of interest rates are you offering? Usury and predatory interest rates. 


" Borrower HAS to contact us by EMAIL to resolve this, as the complaints to CFPB are not the solution. We have no problem working with borrower, we just need to talk to her. '' Consumer has engaged an attorney and will have my attorney contact you. What about violation of FCRA? There is definitely a violation?
I only have one collections account. Its from an old XXXX bill, the collections agency ERC is coming after me for {$860.00}. I was young & dumb, I wish I could pay it off but I dont have the funds to pay off this amount. I know taking care of my credit is important but my paychecks go to rent & my car payments. Please help, thank you.
Although I received a letter from Green Tree ( see attached ) saying that all calls on this account have been stopped, I received a call at my work on XXXX/XXXX/15 at XXXX. This is unacceptable.
Purchased new vehicle and requested to have credit life and disability added to the loan however, dealership said this is not an option since i am in the military. Was told that the SSRA ( Soldiers and Sailors Relief Act ) prevents them from offering this product to me. Advised dealership that this only applies to active duty military, which I am not. I am a XXXX in the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Dealership also kept my warranty cancellation refunds and charged additional monies to the loan. Although I have a credit FICO score of around 780, i was still charged a 5 % interest fee on the loan
Chase Bank sent me an aggressive reply on this portal trying to verify their inaccurate reporting on my credit file Chase is attempting to validate charge offs with paid receipts from two PAID car loans through their company. On this date XX/XX/2018 Chase Bank is unwilling or unable to provide contracts bearing my signature obligating me to pay the amount theyre claiming.Attached is an FTC opinion letter in reference to what CHASE BANK is attempting to do. Chase is breaking the law and reporting inaccurate information. Help me obtain letters from Chase I requested contractually obligating me to pay the amount charged off.
i was briefly employed by a XXXX company that is based out of XXXX and specializes in the third party consumer collection of subrogation debts across the country. Not only did it become obvious they were not properly licensed in the states they do business but their collection tactics were some of the most abusive and misleading I have EVER witnessed. I have been in the collection business for over twenty years. Disclosure of debts to third parties including texts and written emails, threats of drivers license suspension even when they know the debt does not qualify for that kind of action and open threats of lawsuit and wage garnishment. Just ask to see the collection records as it is all there, the texts, threats, emails, intimidation everything. there is no mini miranda or FDCP used even though they are a third party collecting debts against private individuals. When i complained they changed and reduced my hourly wage. I believe they feel that because some of the debtors were driving without insurance that nobody will care if they are misleading and abusive. Companies like this are the reason that many decent agencies are suffering from lawsuits.
While checking my personal credit report, I noticed an unauthorized and fraudulent credit inquiry made by XXXX CARD on or about XX/XX/XXXX on Experian. I did not authorized anyone employed by this company to make any inquiry and view my credit report. XXXX XXXX has violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act Section 1681b ( c ). They were not legally entitled to make this fraudulent inquiry. This is a serious breach of my privacy rights. 
I have requested that they mail me a copy of my signed authorization form that gave them the right to view my credit within five ( 5 ) business days so that I can verify its validity and advised them that if they can not provide me with proof that I authorized them to view my credit report then I am demanding that they contact the credit bureaus immediately and have them remove the unauthorized and fraudulent hard inquiry immediately. I also requested that they remove my personal information from their records. My Social Security # is XXXX and my Date of Birth is XX/XX/XXXX in case it is needed to locate the fraudulent inquiry in their system.
I was contacted about a request for a mortgage pre-qualification that I made via email on the website XXXX. I was replied to by a XXXX XXXX, who works at The Mortgage Firm in XXXX XXXX, FL. He sent a very disturbingly-worded email to me. I told him he was upsetting me and asked that he not send any further emails. He ignored this and proceeded to send me an email that listed the name " XXXX XXXX '' as the subject line. I had recently contacted a XXXX XXXX, as he is a broker from whom I requested information on a property for sale ... and XXXX XXXX should have had no knowledge of my correspondence with XXXX XXXX. In my mind, there is no possibility that XXXX XXXX ' name could have been mentioned as mere coincidence, as XXXX XXXX and I had never discussed brokers or specific properties in any capacity. This leads me to believe that XXXX XXXX somehow gained access to my email inbox - the only other explanation is that the XXXX men may know each other, and happened to discuss me prior to this second email being sent to me ( this is not professional behavior on their part, if so ). Following my receipt of this second email, I blocked XXXX XXXX from contacting me, but I am still shaken by his knowledge of my personal contacts, and by his disturbing first letter to me. I filed a complaint with the XXXX, but The Mortgage Firm failed to respond to my complaint - they are behaving as if I never filed a complaint at all. I wrote to The Mortgage Firm directly, and also received no response ... I then attempted to call, and they put me on hold in order to hang up on me the moment I gave my name. The attempt I made to call back after this happened was not answered.
RE : Making Home Affordable Incentive Payments With the addition of the {$5000.00} Principle reduction incentive payment ( see here : XXXX ) XXXX issued a letter ( see attached ) notifying lenders/servicers that they send a notice to borrowers who qualify of the option to reamortize or recast their loan. The document specifically states : The servicer must ... 
provide written notice of an option to re-amortize the UPB, excluding deferred principal, over the remaining term of the mortgage loan if at the time of the notice the mortgage loan is in good standing. 
The written notice must be provided at least 60 days, but no more than 120 days, prior to the sixth anniversary of the XXXX HAMP modification effective date ; give the borrower at least 30 days, but no more than 180 days, from the date of the notice to respond to the re-amortization offer ; notify the borrower of any changes to principal and interest payments as required by applicable law ; specify changes to the payment schedule as a result of the re-amortization and total interest to be paid during the remaining term of the mortgage loan after the sixth anniversary of the XXXX HAMP modification effective date, both with and without the effect of the reamortization ; and include the contact information of the servicer and instruct the borrower to contact the servicer if the borrower has questions or concerns about the re-amortize offer. 
Not only did I NOT receive the letter from Ditech, I 've called many times and they will not send the letter. Further more, I was told on the XXXX/XXXX/XXXX when I called in by a supervisor, that my loan did not qualify for a recast! Their customer service reps as well as their supervisors are uneducated on the matter or playing dumb. Of course the consumers can only gain from the recast lowering their monthly payments and the date the PMI falls off which means less money for Ditech. I shudder to think off uneducated borrowers missing out on this opportunity simply because the folks at Ditech refuse to be in compliance with XXXX guidelines. I should have received notice XX/XX/XXXX but I did n't. And I was also told by a rep. that they were not required to send the notice of recast until the incentive payment was applied which is a lie. 

Ditech needs to be investigated and fined for their mishandling of this as well as perhaps thousands of other consumers.
I HAVE A CITIBANK CREDIT CARD.TODAY, I WAS TRYING TO CONTACT CUSTOMER SERVICE. FIRST CALL WENT TO XXXX, THEN IN U.S.A., BOTH WERE NOT CO-OPERATIVE AT ALL. THE CUSTOMER SERVICE IS HORRIBLE, AL THOUGH I SPENT MORE THAN 30 MINS ON THIS CALL. I WAS REQUESTING FOR MY ACCOUNT STATEMENT FOR XX/XX/XXXX BUT THEY DENIED TO DO SO.CITIBANK HAS NO RESPECT FOR CUSTOMER
Summary : I want to be reimbursed for the {$20.00} I 've spent freezing my credit with Experian and XXXX. The CFPB should be investigating these fees. 

Hello there, I thank you for your time and your patience. I 'm sure you are being slammed with requests right now. As an American citizen, I am thankful that we have people like the CFPB to field these complaints. 

Due to the recent XXXX breach in XXXX of 2017, I wanted to freeze all access to my credit reports by any of the existing credit bureaus. Though XXXX reportedly claims my information was not breached, my partners data was, and we both attempted to freeze our accounts, in case XXXX  was incorrect. 

I was astonished to find that XXXX, Experian, and XXXX are not only hawking additional protection services as a result of this breach, but still fully expect consumers to PAY to freeze their credit reports. 

XXXX seems to have done the right thing in offering freeze services for free ( temporarily ), but I am shocked that I had to pay {$10.00} each to Experian and XXXX for these services. 

I would love to be reimbursed for these ludicrous fees ( {$20.00} is {$20.00} more than they deserve in my opinion ), and I would love nothing more than to see the CFPB investigate these companies to help protect consumer data in the future.
XX/XX/XXXX there was a collection account listed on my Equifax report with XXXX, XXXX XXXX XXXX for {$470.00} on the updated report dated XX/XX/XXXX the collections account was no longer listed ; it had been deleted. Now as of today XX/XX/XXXX the account is listed again on my Equifax report with the same collection company and same amount. This information is from XXXX XXXX. Once a collection is deleted it should not be added back with the same information originally deleted.
I was issued a personal check. When I went to cash it at the bank that it was drawn on ( Suntrust ), they wanted to charge me {$7.00} to redeem it claiming that I would have to open an account with them for the fee to be waived. This ca n't be legal. Why should I be penalized for accepting a legal financial bearer instrument. It is as if I were to borrow {$100.00} from you, and when you asked for repayment I told you that I 'd be please to repay you but it would cost you {$7.00} for me to take it out of my pocket.
I have had an AMERICAN Express XXXX Skymiles card for just under 20 years. Last week I received via postal mail a letter stating my XXXX skymiles card was going away and I would be moved at not cost to me to the Gold card. The funny thing about the letter was it stated that the current card was free. I was pretty sure I pay {$50.00} bucks a year for a fee. Well today I get my monthly bill and sure enough I have a {$50.00} fee for annual fee. 

I decide to click on card options and the exact card I have is showing on the AM X web site while I am logged in as carrying NO FEE. 

I did an online chat and it only left me more confused as the agent told me that the no fee card was going away and starting next year I would pay the XXXX fee for the gold card. Yet the card I currently have is listed and shown exactly as mine available at NO FEE. So if I am being charge {$50.00} then it is not a free upgrade. I also understand that XXXX apparently made my card free last year yet they still charged the {$50.00} annual fee last year. 

I asked if all customers were paying for the free card and was told during the chat yes you are all be treated the same. 

I am pretty certain if you were to go to AM X and click on various cards and pull up the XXXX card you would also see that it clearly states NO ANNUAL FEE. So makes zero sense.
I was in a debt management service in year XX/XX/XXXX. My income level lowered, so I contacted this company ans asked would they contact my creditor and asked for a ( pay off now amount ). This management company told me that I would have to not make payments ( go into default ). When in default the management company said then they could contact this creditor about accepting a lower payoff amount. After I went into default this management company did nothing and left me out of contract with them, and I was left out of good standing with this credit. This is when my debt was sold to a third party debt collector for XXXX dollar. That third party debt collector is the focus of my issue. My credit reports has had this bad report for sixteen years. This one debt has been sold and resold to XXXX to different debt collecting companies and going past the time limit to pursue debt without a court case. In XX/XX/XXXX XXXX of the credit reporting agencies dropped this debt from my credit files. But XXXX just got around to removing this collection agency ( on! XX/XX/XXXX ). Here is what made me angry, this collection agency company wrote me in same mouth that XXXX said this creditor listing had came to the its legal duration. In this delt collector 's letter in XX/XX/XXXX, they said that the law would not allow them to come after me on an old debt like mind but they would continue to report my debt to the XXXX collection agencies. I then contacted XXXX and they said there was nothing bad on my current credit report files ( debt collector lies ). This debt company is bothering me every other mouth with a {$730.00}. bill I can 40 % off. I 'm retirement age and I surely know retirement income is not subject to law suit. I just want this company to go away and the bills in my male box to stop too. This is a very very old bill that went wrong and should be forgotten.
This student loan was obtained in XX/XX/XXXX. Since then t it has been in & out of forbearance for many reason, but mainly because I was a single mother. In XX/XX/XXXXI got married and due to my husband 's income I had to start repaying the loan. A few times I did receive more forbearance 's. XX/XX/XXXX I was XXXX XXXX XXXX  with my XXXX child and I received a call that my paychecks would be garnished if I did not start repaying the loan. At that time I set up automatic withdrawals. I completed their rehabilitation program. I was then granted another forbearance and it was only for a few months. I was not aware the forbearance ended and received 5 late payment reporting : XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX & XX/XX/XXXX. Since that time I have been granted several more forbearance and made every payment due timely. Due to the fact that I was not aware nor received anything stating that my loan was due I feel that these late payments should be removed from my credit report. I have requested twice for these to be removed and Nelnet is acting unreasonably. Please help me. I will be paying for my XXXX XXXX loan probably until its time to send my own children to college.
I had a vehicle on lease through Ally Financial. I paid the bills on time, and turned the vehicle in on time, under mileage, and with no damage. Ally 's inspection shows damage that was n't there when I turned the vehicle in. I had to continually XXXX them down to get a response to my complaint. It finally took several calls, and a letter to their CEO to get someone to respond to me, but even then, they would not accept my best evidence ( a digital photo which they would n't accept through email ) as to the fact there was no damage upon turn in. They reduced the amount owed, which I paid, to avoid damage to my credit rating, but there was no opportunity for arbitration, or appeal. There was no process whereby they would respond to me proactively -- except to collect money. The inspection process was clearly set up as a yield enhancement for Ally, and had nothing to do with diminished residual value, as they we looking for scratches under the hood. There was no evidence of chain of custody of the car after turn in. There was no way to provide my best evidence of no damage. There was no independent appeal opportunity. There was no single point of contact to deal with. There were no return calls without my initiating the call.
Good Day, I am writing to you today to request that my credit report be updated to reflect the correct information. I pulled my report from XXXX today and it is showing XXXX. I am not sure what happened buy my credit score dropped by 72 points. 
I have copy and attached the information from the XXXX Website and Also XXXX Report Number : XXXX Date Generated : XX/XX/XXXX Potentially Negative *****The accounts below were included in a Chapter XXXX Bankruptcy. XXXX Bankruptcy # XXXX Discharge Date XX/XX/XXXX so they should not show as late or unpaid. Please contact the reporting agency to update the information. 

XXXX XXXX/XXXX Dispute XXXX XXXX Dispute XXXX XXXX/XXXX   Dispute XXXX XXXX/XXXX XXXX Dispute XXXX XXXX/XXXX XXXX Dispute XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX/XXXX Dispute Personal Information NamesAddressesDOBSSNPhone Numbersshow tooltip button 37 personal information entries View All Accounts Credit CardsMortgagesLoansshow tooltip button 26 accounts, 6 potentially negative Inquiries For Accounts 4 hard inquiries Not Disputable Online.

Public Records No public records reported ******Bankruptcy not showing and Negativley reporting as NOT PAID or LATE******
Dear Transunion, I checked my personal credit report, which I acquired from your company onXX/XX/XXXX and I noticed that a FRAUDULENT inquiry that had been made on XX/XX/XXXX is still being reported on my credit report.

I contacted XXXX XXXX XXXX, who conducted the inquiry and asked them to remove their credit inquiry from my credit profile. According to XXXX XXXX XXXX they can not see the inquiry and so they can not remove something that isnt there.

I request that you initiate a REINVESTIGATION into XXXX XXXX XXXX  (XX/XX/XXXX ) inquiry on my credit report to determine who authorized this hard inquiry. If, once your REINVESTIGATION is complete, you find my allegation to be true, please remove the FRAUDULENT inquiry. ( Do not send me anything via US mail. ) Please note that although the inquiry shown on my credit report is a factual record of the company who accessed and reviewed my profile and although it is only logged on the report, when in fact, an inquiry was made ; a record of this activity, pursuant to federal law, must NOT remain a part of record if the inquiry was FRAUDULENT.

If you find the inquiry referenced above to be valid, please respond only via the CFPB PORTAL with a description of the procedures, used in your REINVESTIGATION to determine that this inquiry was not FRAUDULENT, within 5 days of the completion of the REINVESTIGATION. This includes providing the name, business address, and telephone number of the furnisher ( s ) contacted in connection with this FRAUDULENT hard inquiry. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

Very Respectfully, XXXX XXXX
I contacted Transunion on numerous occasions via telephone in XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX. I also disputed multiple inaccurate inquiries online and via US Mail. They replied each time that all inquiries are factual when in case they are not. I have a fraud alert on my credit report and unauthorized inquiries that I absolutely did not authorize after several failed attempts with Transunion they have not deleted any of the inquiries. I am trying to purchase my first home and having so many inquiries on my report is slowing down the purchase process.
This company is representing an apartment complex I lived at. After two years they  are stating I owe them $ XXXX. I have attached email between me and the apartment property management. They have now sold the file to a collection company while in dispute. Also I stated the rental box was broken into when I put in my 60 day notice. Should n't they have all this information? Should they have not done a police report? 
Property : XXXX XXXX XXXX Unit : XXXX Account # : XXXX Current Balance {$5400.00} I have disputed this prior to being sold as not mines and I do n't owe any moneys why they have sent collection is against the law.
I opened this card at Marshall 's inXX/XX/XXXX. I paid the entire balance off each month on this card. Then in XX/XX/XXXX they contacted me and told me that I was past due about {$600.00}, I told them that I always paid the balance off and asked how could I be past due. They did not have an explanation and now I found it listed on my credit report as in collections for {$930.00}. This is not correct and I need help to get this straightened out.
capital one credit card closed XXXX accounts for no reason. due to the fact they closed the accounts we can not redeem our accumulated points to purchase a new XXXX XXXX  product.
This is a company called Portfolio Recovery claim I owe them {$450.00}. I do not know this company or the company they represent this is fraud. I never authorized any purchase of {$450.00} I never signed anything. This is fraud. They say they are working with XXXX XXXX I have no idea what they are talking about as this was fraud and never authorized by me.