WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
We are currently under chapter XXXX bankruptcy and have our mortgage withOcwen. I received a phone call from Ocwen on a Sunday, XXXX, andwas told we owe them over {$9000.00}. I 've since been told by Ocwen that ourpayment went up from {$1200.00} to {$1500.00} XX/XX/XXXX and they have also told methat I was not notified of this increase, nor was our attorney or the chapterXXXX trustee. How can you indebt us for something that we were never notifiedof in the first place? I also received documentation stating my payment wasgoing to increase XX/XX/XXXX from {$1200.00} to {$1300.00}. I spoke withOcwen yesterday and was told my payment is supposed to be {$1500.00}. Also, we are under a loan modification which lowered our payments to somethingwe could afford, so why do they keep raising our payments?? In addition, when I go onto Ocwens website, it does n't show any increase XX/XX/XXXX and itshows the current amount due as {$1000.00} with a due date XX/XX/XXXX. 
How can I be liable for Ocwens mistake especially since their website is n't evencorrect??? Additionally, is n't it illegal to try and collect a debt from me while I'I 'm under chapter XXXX bankruptcy?
Received a letter from the magistrate court of XXXX  County stating that XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX was suing me as the assignee of CITIBANK.

Form states that it is a " PLAINTIFFS APPLICATION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS ''.

The following wording is noted : " NOW COMES the Plaintiff in the above styled case and files this Application for payment of all funds due Plaintiff paid by Garnishee after such time as the Clerk determines that no claim has been filed and no Traverse has been filed with twenty ( 20 ) days after Garnishee 's Answer was filed.

Moreover, Plaintiff states Garnishee and Defendant will be properly served with the Garnishment pursuant O.C.G.A XXXX and that proof of such service will be filed with the Court prior to any disbursement of funds. '' This letter is signed by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Georgia Bar # : XXXX   The law firm that sent the letter is XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  The APH File number is XXXX
I was racially profiled from the beginning of opening the account. I was told I could n't withdraw my funds when they were direct deposited. I was told I could n't get a Debit Card for the account until 90 days of the account being in good standing. 
I made a transaction to purchase a product online and the vendor never supplied the services and refused to give me a refund. Iberia Bank stated they will not Dispute it because the bank does n't trust they will get their money back. I have never been treated this way by any bank, this bank is racially profiling me as a client and on XXXX/XXXX/16 I requested they close out my account.
On several occasions I have requested that " Paid Civil Judgment '' be removed as derogatory remarks from report. Docket # XXXX for {$3500.00} has been removed. However, Docket # XXXX for {$4000.00} has not. It clearly reflects as Paid, as did the other one, and yet they continue to ignore my requests to remove it as a derogatory item.
Bank of America/ We began calling in XXXX of XXXX. We faxed all papers requested. We followed all and in XXXX of XXXX, we were told we can walk into any branch to file our paperwork. Mind you our mortgage is always paid on time. It is the equity line of credit that they began asking a few dollars short of our mortgage payments that we need lowered. To date we have paid interest monthly, however they feel tripling the amounts we should be able to pay. The facts are I only recieve social security, do not file federal taxes do to my age, and need the equity payments re-evaluated. The bank has asked for same forms over and over, we faxed mailed and can not pay a double mortgage. we explained this only to be refured to a counselor whom informed us that the making homes affordable is no longer. Than today i called the hot line only to be told it is. At this time i need some one to investigate the bank, and the referals they are giving. The bank for not working within the time allowed and the refferal agency for miss leading people. We do not want to loose our home. we only want a lower payment.
Yes I received a pre approve loss mitigation application they Sai all I have to do was signed it and overnight it after reading over it carefully we discovered clause that was n't explain to us like lower your payment after 5 years your payment goes back up we are liking five years before our house is paid off and they are talking about another 30 years and at first they were asking for pay stubs and bank statements and my wife award letter so how can they do this without documents I am 3 months behind on my mortgage I told them I Will be making a payment and half by XX/XX/XXXX and on XX/XX/XXXX and I will not signed it please give some advice I never face anything like this my mortgage sold to another mortgage very unhappy.
I 've been trying to fix multiple errors on my reports, to no avail.my proof of the error carries less weight than the creditors word. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ca, XXXX, is the collection agency that is insisting they are correct, when they 're not. My business XXXX XXXX is a XXXX # XXXX corporation number. We wrote a check to by advertisor, just before I had a XXXX XXXX and was forced to close my business. I should have been protected under my corporation. They will not show me a copy of the check, so I can prove my point.the 3 credit reporting agencies, do n't want to here the truth, or fix it.
I have a state tax liens still showing on my report that was withdrawn in XX/XX/2011. On multiple occasions I have disputed this with Equifax , Providing Equifax with copies of the State Of Alabama Department of Revenue Release forms which states " A tax lien can be withdrawn and released by the department conditioned on payment in full ( which I will also attach here for you ) this tax lien has been paid in full but Equifax will only report it has been released. I have also verified with each county that the lien withdrawals have been recorded. Equifax continues to improperly report the lien. The other CRA 's ( XXXX ) removed the lien from my credit report immediately
I am a new employee of a non-profit and was issued a card through Comdata for my initial paycheck, as the direct deposit process had not been completed by my employer by the end of my first pay period. On Friday, XX/XX/2018, I attempted to withdraw the sum of {$500.00} from the ATM at XXXX XXXX at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX, CT using the Comdata card provided to me. Though the ATM printed a receipt for {$500.00}, the funds were never dispensed, and the ATM displayed an error on the screen. Upon speaking to the manager at the XXXX XXXX   branch, I was advised that I needed to contact Comdata to work it out with them. I immediately contacted Comdata and was connected to a customer service representative. I was advised that a complaint would need to be opened and that I would be hearing from someone within a few days. On XX/XX/2018, after not hearing from anyone, I called Comdata again to check on the status of my complaint. I was told that nothing would be resolved for 21 business days, as an investigation needed to be launched. I waited 21 business days and on XX/XX/2018, I contacted Comdata again. I was provided a case number ( # XXXX ) and was told that I had to write to them to get any additional information, which I did. Though I can appreciate that investigations take time, these are payroll funds that are necessary to pay household expenses. I have been more than patient, but I still have no resolution to this matter. I need some assistance to get my payroll funds back to me immediately. Comdata is located at XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, TN XXXX, XXXX.
Rushcard stated they would be doing a system update that would end at XXXX Mon. XXXX XXXX. They have yet to finish the update and users are shut out of their accounts, funds are missing, deposits have disappeared and no one is answering the customer service lines and if you are able to get thru after a XXXX hour hold time you are hung up on. Something must be done so that this will never happen again. People are in need of their money
This company was awarded judgment against me in  XXXX . From that time until just  XXXX  weeks ago, they have NEVER notified me or attempted to resolve this issue, however they are now taking me back to court, and refusing to provide original debt records, or offer any assistance to pay/settle the debt, if it is mine.     I 've spoke with  XXXX  and  XXXX  who are both worthless.  XXXX  advised that if I did n't pay the balance in full they would be taking my paychecks in whole. The calls are recorded-so I demanded a copy of the records, which he advised " that 's none of my business ''.  XXXX  was no help either as again, they wanted me to make a payment just to show the judge that I did pay, however no payment has been done because I 've never received verification of this debt all the way from   XXXX   to  XXXX . You mean in  XXXX  years, you never tried to collect anything, but are wanting to take me to court? Verify the proof of debt and allow me an option to pay for it, as THIS has NEVER been done. I 've lived in the same city for the whole time and again they have NEVER communicated anything to me.
Mid-XXXX through XXXX XXXX This is the time frame in which Equifax says hackers gained unauthorized access to its data. 

Thursday, XXXX XXXX Equifax discovers the hack and immediately stopped the intrusion. 

Tuesday, XXXX XXXX & Wednesday, XXXX XXXX XXXX top executives from Equifax sell nearly {$2.00} XXXX worth of company stock. 

Thursday, XXXX XXXX Equifax officially alerts the public about the cybersecurity incident and provides a dedicated website for consumers to check if they were affected. Later on that night, the company also issues a statement saying the three executives had no knowledge that an intrusion had occurred at the time they sold their shares. 
-- -- -- -- -- -- -- - I have signed up for their free " service '' and I get contradicting updates from their call center. The executives took action to preserve their profit before they took action to protect those hacked.
U.S. Bank, NA offers a product called the XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. The most valuable benefit of the card is the " Bonus Award Night. '' The Bonus Award Night is a free night on multi-night award stays. When I applied for the card, the marketing materials stated that the benefit is conferred upon the cardholder in exchange for the {$75.00} annual fee. I paid the annual fee on XXXX XXXX, 2015. On my very next statement, I was informed that the Bonus Award Night is no longer a benefit. I think that it is dishonest to cancel the most valuable benefit directly after accepting payment for the annual fee.
We sold a property in XXXX and transferred the money to our account here in USA. The XXXX Bank sent out the money on XXXX XXXX, 2016 via Deutsche Bank, XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX got the money transfer on XXXX XXXX, 2016. The money could not be traced from Deutsche Bank XXXX to Deutsche Bank New York for more than 4 weeks. During this time we lost more than XXXX in the exchange rate XXXX/Dollar. Deutsche Bank is blocking any information on where the money was for this 4 weeks. The only proof we have is the outgoing wire copy from the XXXX Bank and the arrival at XXXX XXXX XXXX. We complaint in XXXX, but Deutsche Bank said we have to go back to the XXXX Bank. But from there we have the clear proof with all correct banking details for the money transfer.And the XXXX " XXXX Deutscher Banken in XXXX '' seems to protect the Deutsche Bank also, as they do no open a case since XXXX when we sent them all documents and proofs.
This is the XXXX time I am complaining to you about the unfair banking practices of Wells Fargo in relation to their checking accounts. I accessed my bank account online and Wells Fargo showed a posted balance of {$190.00}. The asterisk clearly states the posted balance includes transactions that are pending, thus leading the customer to believe the posted balance is the remaining balance minus the pending transactions. So, over the weekend I purchased XXXX product for {$12.00} and then another product for {$5.00}, which are new transactions totaling {$17.00}. The new transactions totaling {$17.00} should well be covered by the posted balance of {$190.00}, right? No, I was charged XXXX XXXX overdraft fees for a total of {$100.00} to cover the {$12.00}, {$5.00} and another recurring {$4.00} transaction. The posted balance is a false balance and leads the consumer to think he or she has more money in the account than he or she actually does, So what happens? The consumer purchases something within the posted balance and creates overdrafts on multiple items, which is profit for the bank. ( I do n't think it costs the bank {$35.00} to " cover '' a {$12.00} or {$5.00} purchase ) Either the bank 's assertion that the posted balance includes posted AND pending transactions is purposely misleading or the posted balances are miscalculated. In either scenario, the consumer is primed for overdraft fees. This practice must stop and I am asking your Bureau to investigate and ensure personal checking balances are accurate within the industry. Personally, I believe I should not have paid overdraft fees since I acted on the posted balance as stated by Wells Fargo and I am seeking reimbursement.
This company sent a negative information as retaliation to my credit report. after I reported them to the XXXX. In my prevouis report they show the account as closed and not in their office. In checking my credit report they re aged the XXXX account. 

They stated in case number Case Number : XXXX Reference : XXXX, XXXX, & XXXX they showed they closed the account. 

This is against FRCA reporting and I demand compensation for pain and suffering volutarlery or through small claims court. 

I am also contacting my states attorney generals office for the tactics used by this company. 

here is the XXXX case against them. 

Case Number : XXXX Reference : XXXX, XXXX, & XXXX XXXX, XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXXCase Number : XXXX Reference : XXXX, XXXX, & XXXXDear Consumer Financial Protection Bureau : This is in response to the complaint received from XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

XXXX separate accounts were placed with our office for collection to service the delinquent portions owed. 
On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, we received an account from our client XXXX with a balance of {$260.00} and it was assigned the internal reference number XXXX. The account was later closed in our office and returned to XXXX on XXXX XXXX, XXXX. Our agency previously submitted a deletion for this account ; however it appears it was not processed correctly by the credit reporting agencies. In an effort to resolve XXXX XXXX 's concerns, our agency has submitted a manual deletion request with all credit reporting agencies associated with the XXXX account and our office. The confirmation number for this request is XXXX. 
On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, we received an account from our client XXXX with a balance of {$590.00} and it was assigned the internal reference number XXXX. On XXXX XXXX, XXXX, our agency sent an initial letter notifying XXXX XXXX that his previously disputed XXXX account was placed in our office for resolution to the address on file. Said letter also informs XXXX XXXX that an investigation of his dispute has been completed. Our agency has had no communication with XXXX XXXX regarding the account to date. 
In response to XXXX XXXX 's dispute, we have closed his account in our office and returned it to our client for further review. When an account is closed unpaid and returned to our client, our agency submits a deletion request to all credit reporting agencies associated with the account and our office. We will have no further contact with XXXX XXXX regarding the XXXX account. If he has further questions regarding the account he may contact our client directly at the address below : XXXX XXXX XXXX, CO XXXX
Usaa was contacted today via phone in regards to continued inaccurate reporting of data on my credit report with all XXXX credit bureaus. I was given the run around by the representing with no resolve. I was told there is no one or department that handles discrepancy in reporting credit. I would like the closed account that they are reporting with an increasing past due amount every month to show correct balance, which was the balance owing when closed and charged off over XXXX years ago in XX/XX/2011! This violation of my rights under the FCRA needs to cease.
My payment for  Navy Federal CU  was due  XXXX   XXXX . I had other payments to make besides  Navy Federal si nce this account is closed. So I paid {$20.00} on the  XXXX  and   XXXX   XXXX   XXXX    for  my  XXXX  payment. Then I followed up and sent  two  more payments on the  XXXX  and the    XXXX   XXXX   XXXX     equal to {$60.00} ( {$10.00} & {$50.00} ) They also applied a {$20.00} la te fee which is fine. Then on the  XXXX  they reported to the credit bureaus that I was 30 days late for  XXXX  which is not true. I know that the only way you can be 30 days delinquent on an account is if there was none payment in which it was. They reported the balance which would cover   XXXX   XXXX   bill to {$74.00} owed and  XXXX   XXXX  just passed so how can you add  2 di fferent payments on a credit report that is not 30 days passed due. I calle d Navy Federal and the reps that I spoke to could.not give me an answer and eventually agreed with m  e. Navy Federal c an not do as they please.
Individuals from Student Assistance Corporation have begun calling me, asking for me by name and saying the call is regarding a Navient Student Loan. I tell them that I do not have a student loan. They then ask me to give them my personal information. I refuse to give my personal information so they say the calls will continue. On XXXX XXXX, 2016, at XXXX. I received a call from them XXXX. I called them back to again tell them I do not have a student loan and asked for their address. The lady refused to give me an address and insisted I give her my birthdate. She told me it was a Navient student loan. I used that information to look up the address and send letter telling them I do not have a student loan, do not call me and to send and further communication in writing. They received the letter on XXXX/XXXX/2016 ( USPS Item # XXXX ). The calls have continued with six calls on XXXX/XXXX/2016.
I called to ask for a retention offer and I never gave permission for them to close my credit card. I complained about 1. bad service 2. the annual fee.

The call got disconnected ( which in such a case has happened before and nothing happened after that ) and my credit card got closed 9 hours later against my consent and will. 

I tried to have them reinstate it and they claim the card is no longer offered which is a lie at it's best. The card is a XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. 

I would like to add that this has happened to me before and I was shot down by Amex all day until I opened a CFPB complaint ... ... it seems Amex won't move until they get pressed against the wall.

See link below that it is still being offered : XXXX XXXX XXXX I called them numerous times and spent more than 5 hours on this and was told yes we will get it sorted and all this and then only to get told no later on in the phone call. 

In addition I have some {$7000.00} in charges that are eligible for XXXX points per dollar which is XXXX points and now I will also be losing these points.
Citibank charged {$39.00} over-the-limit fee on my Citi Professional Card. The Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009, card issuers can not charge this fee unless cardholders opt in to allow the issuer to approve transactions that push them over their credit limit. I had never opted in to allow Citi to approve transactions over my credit limit. I called Citi and they said it was part of the conditions in the terms and they have the permission. I then asked to opt out and asked them to decline any future transactions if there is no sufficient credit available. They said they do not have that option.
Had a XXXX conventional fixed mortgage through XXXX that originated in XX/XX/XXXX. That loan was sold to Rushmore Loan Management on XX/XX/XXXX That transaction was completed on XX/XX/XXXX ( Rushmore loan # XXXX ). 
My XXXX homeowners insurance was being paid through escrow for approximately 11yrs and the information was transferred to Rushmore ( policy # XXXX XXXX ). 
A pipe or connection burst in the condo and caused approximately $ XXXX in damages to the unit below me. While contacting XXXX to start a claim, they stated that the policy lapsed on XX/XX/XXXX and was never pain by Rushmore. Representatives from Rushmore have sent this to the " research dept. '' ( claim # XXXX ), but I have been told it may take XXXX days for them to make a decision. Can you help expedite this?!
On XXXX, I had XXXX checks clear my account. XXXX for {$300.00} and the other for {$160.00}. On XXXX/XXXX/15 I transfered money from my other checking account to cover ATM transactions and some other Credit transactions. Please see the attached document, which clearly shows I had a posititve balance post on XXXX, yet they still are charging me {$35.00} for each check that cleared. The other credit transactions, along with my transfer has not even posted yet. I understand an authorization was placed for those credit transactions, however, if the balance was negative on XXXX after checks cleared, why did they authorize more transactions? Wells Fargo has a habit of back posting debits/checks if they see it will make your account go negative. I have experienced on more than XXXX occasion, yet they wait to credit deposits. I have XXXX separate checking accounts ( XXXX are mine and XXXX is my son 's ) I realize having XXXX accounts confused me on which acct I was using for those credit transactions, which is why I immediately transfered cash from my other account, which had more than sufficient to cover my transactions. As you will see from the attached document, it shows a positive balance of {$18.00} AFTER the checks were paid.