WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
Several months ago, I filed 2-3 complaints against the American Express Company dealing the following : On about XX/XX/XXXX and XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX, monies were electronically sent to American Express Company ( AMEX ) by XXXX XXXX XXXX. These monies were sent back to be applied against a personal loan I had taken with AMEX. There were two separate transfers made : {$350.00} on XX/XX/2018 - Reference Trace Number : XXXX {$10000.00} on XX/XX/XXXX - Reference Trace Number : XXXX AMEX had verbally acknowledged receipt/return of these funds and had been agreeing to credit any interest that may be accruing for the amount of the funds returned. 

On or about XXXX of this year, American Express Company finally resolved this matter by crediting me for the returned funds along with any additional finance charges that may have been charged. 

On or about XX/XX/XXXX, I was again charged for the amount of {$10000.00}! It was listed as a " Reversal of Balance Transfer ''. I have been trying to resolve this again with AMEX employees, XXXX and XXXX without success. I am also now being charged interest for the new larger balance. Finally, I am being adversely impacted by this mistaken/fraudulent charge as I in the process of refinancing some properties. My outstanding short-term debt is being reported as {$10000.00} then it actually is. Can someone please, please get this resolved and stop singling me out for this mistreatment?!!
Something is wrong with the electronic payment system at XXXX. I have tried to make my XX/XX/2017 payment twice and the payments still have not been taken out of my checking account. I have tried calling multiple times, but I never talk to a live person. There is a phone number on their website, I have called over and over again, but no person can be reached. Why wo n't they pull the finds out of my account? Will my payment be reported as late? Will I have late fees, will this appear as a late payment on my credit report? I have lots of questions but no one to answer them. I made a payment of {$520.00} on the company website on XX/XX/2017. Then I made a second payment of {$520.00} on XX/XX/2017 also on the company website. Today is XX/XX/XXXX and the money is still sitting in my checking account.
I have an existing investigation with CFPB number XXXX I have received an email reply from Equifax with a new case number XXXX When I try to log into Equifax website to view the results or the status of the dispute, I am not able due to incorrect information and no access There is no information on the Equifax website on how to contact them, email or phone I would like to get some clarifications/answers : 1 ) With all the complains against this company, why are they still allowed to do business in the United States 2 ) Why is this company allowed to report on persons credit with the wrong information 3 ) Who do I have to contact or how do I get to have this company stop reporting on my credit and history, since the information provided is incorrect and of no help to my credit report and/or history
On XX/XX/2018 I filed a written demand ( USPS Certified mail # XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ) for Validation of Debt with Landmark Accounts Inc. a debt purchaser in XXXX, IN for an negative collection account they placed on my consumer credit files with XXXX , XXXX, XXXX   and others. 

I requested legal validation and documents showing bearing my signature that makes me liable for this account. 

It has been more than 30 days and Landmark Accounts Inc. has refused to validate the debt and continues to report the debt as valid to the credit bureaus. I am requesting your assistance in getting this debt validated or removed.
To whom it may concern : On Friday, XXXX/XXXX/XXXX I received a text message from an acquaintance of mine, jokingly asking if I would be sharing with him a recently issued {$350.00} new-account bonus. I was both surprised and angered that he somehow managed to get this information. Upon asking him how he learned that I recently received such a bonus, he replied that an employee of HSBC Bank in XXXX XXXX disclosed this information to him. 

I immediately called the branch and spoke with XXXX XXXX XXXX banker who allegedly disclosed my account information to a third party without my consent, verbal or written ). I have an individual checking account with HSBC and never had anyone else on the account. Nor was I ever asked or granted permission to share my account information with anyone other than myself. 

XXXX XXXX immediately admitted to making a mistake in sharing my account information with a third party, and apologized for doing so. I was so angry that I hung up on him. I collected myself and called him again. This time he was away from his desk, but another employee promised to have him call me back, which he did promptly. 

During our second conversation, I apologized to XXXX for hanging up on him, however I made it very clear that I was extremely upset that he - or any other HSBC employee - would ever disclose private banking information to anyone unauthorized to have such information. 

Again, XXXX apologized and admitted to his mistake. His apology seemed sincere, and my prior interactions with XXXX XXXX all via telephone ) were always very pleasant. XXXX was the only employee at the XXXX XXXX branch of HSBC who always seemed genuine. He was easy to communicate with, he was prompt in his replies, he was courteous and respectful. He was the last person whom I would ever imagine doing something like this. 

I truly believe that XXXX is genuinely sorry for disclosing my information. I know he regrets doing it. In the end, him sharing this particular bit of my personal account information with my acquaintance did no physical or financial harm to me. Yet, I feel betrayed and violated, and I hope that this does not happen to another customer, with potentially much more serious consequences. 

My hope is that HSBC takes this incident as a learning opportunity for itself and its employees. I hope that some educational material is distributed to its employees for review and acknowledgement. I hope that XXXX does not get severely disciplined for his actions and is given a chance to continue to work for HSBC. I wish him the best, but I also want to ensure that other customers ' privacy is protected moving forward. 

PS - I am not sure if branch phone calls are recorded or not, but I will gladly provide the exact times of when these phone calls took place.
I received a debit card from Wells Fargo in the mail on XX/XX/XXXX. The card had originally been mailed to a Kentucky address. The envelope was returned to Wells by the post office as there was no one by my name at the Kentucky address. Wells then re-mailed it to me at my correct address in Illinois.  Of course it should have been a " red flag '' to Wells when the card was returned to them from the original address.When I received the card, I immediately called Wells to understand why I was receiving this debit card. I have never had an account with Wells or done any business with Wells. My call was directed to the Identity Theft unit. They told me that someone had opened a bank account online in my name using my social security number and birthdate. When I asked how that could happen with out some form of picture ID or signature verification, Wells said that was not needed to open an account online. As a XXXX of a XXXX XXXX XXXX, I know that we require a picture ID and identity verification on all transactions. How can Wells open up and account without a verification process? This should be prohibited by the CFPB and the appropriate banking regulators.
I am being constantly harassed a third party collection law firm claiming there is an outstanding balance for a XXXX final hearing that never even occurred, after my having already paid thousands of dollars in 2017. The collector claims to be an attorney and repeatedly calls in a nasty, harassing and threatening matter, having already been told to cease.
I have a credit card with the company with a credit line of {$700.00}. I went onto their website and made a purchase of {$580.00} on Tuesday   XXXX    . I went into the store today  X/XX/17    to return {$340.00} worth of the online purchase due to ill fitting clothing. I then went to try on clothes and shop in store for better fitting clothes. I went to the check out counter with my purchase and was told I had to to call the customer service number but not why. With a line of people behind me I had to call the customer service number. The first representative advised me that I did not have any available credit to make my purchase and that I was in fact over my limit. I advised her that I had a credit line of {$700.00} and made a purchase of {$580.00} and a return of {$340.00} ; therefore, I should have {$450.00} available. She informed me that my return today of {$340.00} would not credit my account until the clothes made it back to the online warehouse. That is bad enough. I can understand if the credit takes a few days to post, but if the store has the clothes they should not have to wait to credit me until the clothes physically make it back to the warehouse when the company is possession of the clothes! My real gripe though is that even without the return I should have had {$110.00} in available credit. The lady argued this point with me as I tried to get her to understand basic math. She then transferred me to a another representative who researched my account and let me know that while she agreed that yes I should have an available credit of {$110.00} I do n't have any available credit and I 'm showing as over my credit limit. I asked how this could possibly be. She tells me that even though she can see the original {$580.00} hard posted to my account that there is still a {$580.00} authorization holding funds on my account that she can not manually release, so my account reads as having {$1100.00} charged to it. This makes absolutely no sense. I could have spent {$700.00} even that day online, but I did n't. Due to their weird practices of hard posting and having the authorization still there  four  days after my purchase means I could not use {$110.00} worth of credit that I should have had available to me. I wasted three hours of my time in that store trying on clothes and dealing with the phone call in line in front of other patrons only to walk away empty handed. I also missed out on a store-wide sale today that I wo n't be able to take advantage of when my account finally balances out. This is beyond frustrating. When all credits post to my account and the authorization falls off I think I might just close the account and never shop there again.
I received, by mail, a letter advising me of my " pre-qualified '' loan for {$7500.00}. '' - " To guarantee you pre-qualified status, be sure to request your money before XX/XX/2018. I applied using the appropriate " Pre-Qualified Code '' before the XXXX date as described in letter and was denied credit. 

I would consider this a UDAAP violation as is misrepresents the pre-qualified status and if anyone else experiences similar notification and denial would consider this a class action. I have a copy of the letter should you care to review.
I received a {$50.00} American Express Prepaid Reward card as a rebate for a purchase in XX/XX/2015. Upon receiving the card, I noted an expiration date of XX/XX/XXXX and have carried it in my wallet ever since. When I went to use the card today, I was shocked to learn that there was only {$2.00} available on the card. 

I have since carefully reviewed the back of the card, which includes the following text : " FUNDS EXPIRE ON THE DATE PRINTED ON THE FRONT OF THE CARD. SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE LAW, A {$3.00} MONTHLY FEE WILL BE ASSESSED AGAINST CARD BALANCE STARTING 7 MONTHS AFTER CARD ISSUANCE. '' In my case, these fees added up to {$48.00}. 

I am disappointed that American Express has taken away 96 % of my rebate amount, when the front of the card indicates the funds do not expire for four more years and there is no asterisk, footnote, or other disclaimer on the front of the card that would cause a consumer to inquire about further restrictions or limitations. Had I not used the card today, the funds would have been entirely depleted next month. Thus, at the very least, the expiration date on the front of the card should read XX/XX/XXXX. 

Furthermore, American Express is certainly aware of whether it will charge such fees " under applicable law, '' while the average consumer is not. In fairness, it would be helpful for American Express to include a web address after this disclosure, pointing cardholders to a page on their website providing more specific information about the fees it assesses for its prepaid cards in each state.
X/XX/2017 Thursday @ XXXX, {$620.00}, the store manager XXXX from XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX TX XXXX XXXX Ph : XXXX right off the bat during the welcoming into the office displayed by the Manager XXXX actions of hatred towards myself in front of my wife, all while she harassed me, with a hostile, tone by disrespecting my wife and I used all while using Abusive Misconduct Language being very rude, ill minded, demonstrating poor Unprofessional MisBehavior in public on office site grounds. 
All in the event of my wife and I walking in to open a new loan under her name. 
XXXX XXXX the Manager instantly verbally attacked me pushing for me to make a payment, when my loan account had been charged off. this so called manager did n't have the common courtesy and Respect, Integrity nor decency to apologize to my Wife and I for such ill display of misconduct with negative impulsive behavior and has made such a negative impact we the way there business practice are handed. my wife and i realized that XXXX XXXX the manager was actually threatening me in front of my wife in order to attempt to collect a charged off account debi. 
XXXX XXXX stated while claiming that I owed her money that it was her money she lend me. I avoided engaging in any form of conversation due to XXXX XXXX the manager 's low childish standard display of unprofessional attitude and misbehavior that was being projected to deliberately pushing and provoking to instigate some type of argument. which she was using her authority position as manager in instill fear and create scare tactics in order for myself to pay her something. I told her, No that I was n't going to make no such payment especially displaying such hostile, insulting and offensive tone, attitude, and immature manner. After her outburst of Rage, I remain clam and kept my composure only for the reason that My wife and I needed to take out the loan due to a emergency of personal private matters. I inform the Manager that I will be coming back to discuss filing a Complaint and she laugh.
I have a debt collection agency Listed on my credit report named Assetcare LLC, collecting on the behalf of XXXX XXXX. I 'm disputing this debt because Assetcare LLC is n't license in the state of Florida.
Re : Acct # XXXX According to XXXX and another collection agency called XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, I am indebted to them in the amount of {$11000.00}. I have on numerous letters requested validity of their claim. All that l have been receiving spreadsheets with numbers on them. I have reached out to all 3 Credit Reporting Agencies, XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, and XXXX  on numerous letters ( Please see attached letters and their responses from XXXX  ) have FAILED to honor my request. 

I have no knowledge of the validity of the alleged debt, nor of the certifiably compliant matter to either its collection attempts and or its reporting despite previous consumer filed composed complaints checking for each. Might it be known to XXXX any debt claim must be pursued for collection in a very defined and precisely compliant and physically verifiable or certifiable manner as detailed in the requisite obeyed federal and state collection regulations associated with said claim to include but not limited to the FDCPA and TCPA, etc. ADDITIONALLY, if an entity acts as a collector and also elects to act as a reporting party of consumer credit they must as well adhere to every single one even each any and all of the regulatory reporting requisites and standards of reporting with legal standing in full accordance of laws and accepted reporting standards. To date, XXXX has failed to demonstrate any capacity or willingness to validate the alleged debt much less certify the fair, accurate, complete and compliant reporting of the claims, particularly being significantly deficient is any display of certified metro 2 compliance. As such, given the fact of recent breaches of information collection repositories, I am hesitant to readily accept what is presented without testimonial and certified physically verifiable document evidence of claim as being legitimate. I deny nothing, yet I reserve the right to question any unproven claim. I do NOT accept the statement of claim by XXXX and I call on the CFPB to reject their claim as untrue, unverified, incomplete, not compliant or otherwise invalid and thereby reject-able and dischargeable which requires to be dismissed in full. I demand said court resolution today, even here and now in full accords of regulatory statutes, mentioned by me or not.
Equifax had removed an account   XXXX    XXXX   XXXX  off my credit report. However I just viewed my report on   XXXX   XXXX   and it shows this account again.  XXXX   XXXX   XXXX  had confirmed that this information will be deleted from all  XXXX  credit reporting agencys. It was deleted and as of today it looks as though it has been re-inserted again. I spoke to corporate office at   XXXX   XXXX    XXXX  a few months ago and it was confirmed they would contact all  XXXX  credit reporting agency 's and have this information deleted. Having this put back on my report is affecting my credit score in a negative way. I am submitting this complaint about equifax because they should have never re-inserted this informaiton once they were notified it was to be deleted off my report.
XXXX XXXX XXXX filed debt for cell phone that is not mine, sent to collection without any notification to me, Equifax will not respond to three dispute requests, starting 6 months ago. continues to list this debt on my credit report. Was removed by other reporting agency back in XXXX, Equifax removed and then relisted without notification.
i called in to open a checking account with USAA back in late 2015, whne i was told that i already had a account with them. I told the Rep that i have never opened a previous account with them, so she ask me some personal info to verify what she had on file. the info did not match so she changed it to my current info so who ever was using the account could not continue to use it. i later contacted the fraud department about the discovery conducted a investigation. they gave me a call about a week later stating that i a am still responsible for the negative balance on the account since the infomation matches. i told them that i just updated my info with a customer service rep eariler. i have been trying to resolve this for quite some time but USAA is cooperating at all.
After logging in online on XXXX/XXXX/2016 and previous being logged in online through my account on XXXX/XXXX/2016 I noticed that Amazon Credit Card ( Synchrony Bank ) had lowered my credit limit from {$600.00} to {$100.00}. Which is very funny seeing that I just had their card security make a payment to pay the prior balance of over {$700.00} as a debt cancellation just two days before and that posted on XX/XX/XXXX. Well on XX/XX/XXXX even though the statement generated on XX/XX/XXXX shows available of {$100.00}, it still showed I had an available credit limit of {$600.00} and - balance on my account. Well when I woke up on Sunday to make a purchase I noticed I only had a {$100.00} limit I immediately called them and spoke to a manager who informed me the reason that my account limit was lowered was because of the claim being filed and the account being paid off by card security. I asked her again how is that fair that something that is there to protect someone 's credit causes them to have negative effects on the credit when they use it. She then changed her story stating that the limit was lowered because after the payment a new credit report was pulled and that the decision was based on factors that were obtained from that report and that this is something that Synchrony randomly does but has never done in the time I have had the account and also they have pulled my credit prior to XX/XX/XXXX because I had tried to get a credit increase and it was denied because of credit at that time, so that theory of randomly being selected should be knocked off the list of why my account was lowered. This is the company 's attempt to fault customers when they use the card protection on the accounts they have with Synchrony Bank and they are using excuses of random credit report checks, or your pay history ( which before the event happened was paid every month ) to justify lowering a customers credit after they use the account security and something should be done about this because if you research it online there are XXXX 's of other customers this has happened to after using card security and they continue to get away with this.
I opened a bank account at Citi ( CitiGold checking account ) with a publicly available bonus code that would grant me a specific bonus ( XXXX Thank You Points ). As soon as I opened the account, I sent a Secure Message asking if the bonus was tied to my account, and the response from Citi was a confirmation of such. Upon completing the requirements, I then sent another Secure Message, where Citi replied stating that my bonus points would post within 3 statement periods, just as the promotion stated. I was told the points would hit my account no later than XX/XX/XXXX. XX/XX/XXXX, I reached out to Citi where I was told I would not be granted the points. This is a complete reversal of what I was told by their own personnel, which is why I felt it necessary to reach out.
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Pa XXXX XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Oh XXXX XX/XX/17 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Tx XXXX XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Tx XXXX XX/XX/17,XX/XX/17 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX  XXXX, Ca XXXX XX/XX/17 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Mn XXXX XX/XX/17,XX/XX/2017 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Tx XXXX XX/XX/17 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, Mi XXXX XX/XX/17 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Tx XXXX XX/XX/2017 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX, XXXX, Tx XXXX XX/XX/2017 XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX XX/XX/17 All of these companies have inquiries on my credit report that were never authorized by me.
XXXX  management calls me over  XXXX  times a day. They call early and late. They have now changed their number to unknown. I am trying to dispute this debt but they still call.