WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
XXXX sold my loan to Select Portfolio Servicing , Inc. in XX/XX/XXXX every since then I have been having problems with my mortgage. They are a company out of Utah whom I am not sure if they know California mortgage laws they are very rude when they talk to you on the phone once they even hung up on me because the manager said they were closing and his reps were tired. When they took over my loan I was paying my flood insurance on my own, XX/XX/XXXX I received my paid declaration page from my insurance carrier I called them and asked who paid my insurance they replied SPS did. I then called XXXX XXXX and asked them why did they pay my flood insurance they stated the laws in Calfornia requires them to pay my flood insurance from my escrow account even though paying it shorten my escrow balance. XX/XX/XXXX I received a notice stating they added very expensive flood insurance to my loan even though they had already paid flood insurance through my escrow account. I called and the people on the phone insisted it was n't paid and they were going to leave the enforced insurance. I had to called my insurance company explain to them what was happening and ask them to help me eventually XXXX helped me to resolved the problem. Recently I received a notice that my flood insurance was not paid I really thought it was a mistake until XXXX XXXX sent me a letter stating I have no insurance so they were adding there expensive insurance to my loan again. I almost passed out I 'm thinking this just ca n't be they told me not to pay it that it 's part of my escrow account yet when I called the uncaring guy on the phone just said he did n't see were it was part of my escrow account and they did n't budget it into my escrow. They got me now, I have to find money somewhere to purchase flood insurance or have mine reinstated so I wo n't have to take their expensive coverage. This is going to ruin my grand kids XXXX and something tells me they are going to do this again the only way to make them stop is to walk away from my home. What a horrible company, it 's sad we do n't have a chose and how many others have they done this to.
I filed and completed a Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure in XXXX with XXXX. They also issued a XXXX " Cancellation of Debt '' which was recorded on my XXXX IRS Tax Forms. XXXX was negligent in filing the Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure documents with XXXX XXXX Assessor of Property and Tax Accessor 's Office. The Clerk 's offices show that I own the property at : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX, TN XXXX free and clear of any lien and that the property is deeded in my name. I believe this to be in error because I ca n't fathom the lienholder willing to give me the property mentioned herein, especially after filing and both parties agreeing to Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure. XXXX or XXXX XXXX XXXX transferred service to LoanCare. I have requested and have proof of my request to communicate in writing, via email. They refuse to do so. They also do not want me recording the phone conversation if I call. My preferred method of communication is email. 

Furthermore, XXXX called me on XXXX XXXX, XXXX, she stated the following in speaking to both my wife and I on speakerphone : 1. In 30-60 days, when everything is finalized, LoanCare will record the " account settled and nothing due '' on my credit history. 

2. In 30-60 days, LoanCare would file the proper Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure documentation with XXXX XXXX Tax Accessors Office and XXXX XXXX Clerk 's Office. As previously stated via email on XXXX XXXX XXXX, those offices ' records show I own the property free and clear of any lien with the property in my name. These issues are to be fixed in the 30-60 day timeframe. 

3. I am to email a copy of the XXXX XXXX Tax Statement to LoanCare for payment.
On XXXX XXXX, I made a payment through t the Capital One website for {$300.00}. On XXXX XXXX, an automatic payment was made for {$1400.00}, because of a setting to " pay full balance '' or similar setting. This was unintentional, as the setting had been made months ago, when bill was normally under {$10.00} monthly. When I realized that this transaction was pending in my checking account with my home bank, I contacted Capital One to cancel the transaction or set up a refund. I was told that the transaction was already processing, and to contact them when it went through and cleared my checking account, that they would refund it for me. I called on XXXX XXXX when it was cleared from my checking account. I was told that the refund was processing and could be several business days. I then received a letter in the mail that the transaction was unable to be processed at this time, but to call if I had questions. 
On the evening of XXXX XXXX, I called, and was told that the reason it was declined or unprocessed was that my banking account number and routing numbers were not on file. I then provided this information. A week later, I still had no refund. Today, XXXX XXXX, I called checking on my refund. I was told that it was processed on XXXX XXXX, and declined on XXXX XXXX, but that it was because my bank declined it. I was advised to call my bank, but I was assured by them that I needed to make sure that Capital One had the correct routing number on file, and selected checking account to ensure proper transaction. 
When I called again, for the second time today, and fifth time contacting Capital One in two weeks over this issue, I was told that they just could not refund it, that it would keep getting declined, and did " not meet the criteria '' without any examples or answers on what this criteria is, for a refund. I just bought a home, my checking account is empty, I am paying over charges and fees for bills that I can not cover in my checking, and Capital One will not return MY MONEY to me, or provide a reasonable explanation. I closed my account with them, but I still need that money to live on.
Keep calling me while I'm at work I wish they would email me. I told them to stop calling and email me
XX/XX/XXXX : I arrived at a BoA location to make an ATM deposit. I attempted to use an ATM. It gave me an error. Another customer was off to the side and noticed this. He said that ATM is having issues and that he is on the phone with BoA right now about an error that ATM just made on his transaction. I cancelled out of that ATM, walked over to the next one and made my deposit. When I requested an e-mail only receipt as usual, it gave me an error and printed one instead. I didn't think more of that - I threw the receipt away. 

XX/XX/XXXX : I noticed that BoA made the deposit successfully but also made a withdrawal at the same time for the same amount. I called in to dispute this as I did not make this withdrawal. I gave the rep all info including about the other person who was on the phone making a claim. 

XX/XX/XXXX : I received notice from BoA that my claim was denied because it was " The same person that used both ATMs ''. At this point I realized that the ATM glitches were causing them to think I used and made a withdrawal at the ATM that gave me an error. I asked them to re-check the claim and get photo and video proof that I was withdrawing money from that ATM. I specifically mentioned this being a BoA banking location lobby on XXXX XXXX in XXXX XXXX, blocks away from XXXX XXXX. I mentioned this because they should have very clear photos and videos of that entire transaction that would be easy to pull. The agent said they will get back to me within 10 days, the standard for claims. 

XX/XX/XXXX : I called in BoA to get an update on the status. The first agent said they don't see any updates since XX/XX/XXXX and they asked me if BoA had reached out to me since XX/XX/XXXX. I said they did not and requested an escalation to a manager. I spoke to a manager who told me that the guideline for reopening claims is actually 60 days and that they do not have any limit on the amount of time to review a re-opened claim may take. 

It's at this point now that I'm frustrated because BoA glitched out, took money from my account, refused to properly review the claim, did not communicate the " guideline '' for reviewing reopened claims, and now they are telling me they have no timeline to review the re-opened claims.
I have been contacting OneMain Financial, who appear on my credit file as OneMain numerous of times trying to rectify the situation regarding unauthorized inquires but I have been given the run around and told I would be contacted back on numerous of occasions but I have not. Initially I was not even sure what type of loan company this company is but upon contacting them I was told my social security number was used during an application to obtain a loan of some sort. On my XXXX report, there are inquires dates of XX/XX/XXXX, XX/XX/XXXX. Neither of these did i authorize or give permission. they are a result of fraud.
I have a XXXX XXXX XXXX aka XXXX XXXX   XXXX. On XX/XX/2018 I logged on their website and requesting a credit line increase. While I was completing the form on their website. which is XXXX there was an option just under the annual income field that states " by selecting this check box, I am allowing the bank to access my credit report, if necessary. '' I made certain that I did not check that box and i did not. 

Well on XX/XX/2018 I get an email alert from Experian stating that something changed on my credit file. I logged on and according to Experian it was a hard inquiry from XXXX XXXX  for new credit. I did not authorized XXXX to pull my credit. I called Experian to dispute the inquiry but Experian referred me back to XXXX. I called XXXX and that stated I must submit a written request and that they have 90 days to respond. I found that to be absurd. So I decided to submit a complaint through CFPB. 

Also Experian would not take my complaint at all even though after I logged in to their site ( i have credit monitoring service with them ) and attempted to submit the dispute online their website directed me to call to submit disputes about credit inquiries. After waiting 30 minutes on the phone their rep stated they do not dispute take credit inquiries and i must dispute though the company directly. I found that odd and i asked 2 times just for clarification
The site " XXXX '' is a self service debt collection platform. It is owned and/or affiliated by Fidelity Capital Holdings , Inc ; Fidelity Information Corporation and other corporate obfuscations. I received a " Collection Notice '' as initiated by the " Creditor '' ( XXXX XXXX ) dated XXXX XXXX, 2017. The letter was generated by using the " XXXX '' website that allows virtually ANYONE to report a consumer debt, in any amount. The letterhead of the Notice states the company name " Fidelity Information Corporation ''. This creditor using this Debt Collection agency 's online site by a means of extorting or " ruin my credit '' and is being allowed willfully by the Debt Collection Company. There is NO oversight for consumers by this website. Virtually ANYONE and WITHOUT a court ordered judgment or social security number, can make grotesque claims of debt owed and impair a consumer credit report and score. This creditor is demanding I remove an online review or " suffer '' credit consequences at an amount that is severely overstated. It is outlandish and should be in violation of the law. The CFPB has yet to provide ANY oversight to Debt Collectors that allow anyone ( John Q Public ) for a fee, report ANY debt amounts, including fictitious, that is ONLY validated by the any creditor ( individuals, businesses, anyone ) that can be used to perpetrate extortion! This is no oversight.
I have been disputing inquiries with all  XXXX  bureaus since  XXXX   2017 . My initial dispute for VALIDATION was online and the results came back as " verified ''. When I called in    XXXX   XXXX    2017   to clear up that I asked for VALIDATION not verification and to inquire on what proof they had in accordance to FCRA reporting rules that the inquires were " verified '', I was told that I had to dispute them with each company. I reminded them that according to FCRA rules, it is the burden of the reporting agency to report accurate information and be able to prove such accuracy if asked and if they can not furnish such proof they are obligated by law to delete it and in return to my statement I was told again I needed to call the creditor. I then disputed the inquiries with the creditors and received the same " verified '' dispute status. I then initiated ANOTHER dispute    XXXX   XXXX  2017     in writing asking AGAIN for VALIDATION and the  XXXX  bureaus returned with the same " verified '' notification but no one has proof as to me actually applying for these accounts. I furnished the bureaus with a identity theft report and continue to ask them to show me the proof that the inquiries are verified . It has now been 60plus days  an d 3  disputes later and no one including the original creditor can show me proof I applied for these accounts nor credit issued for any of the questioned inquiries. the  XXXX  bureaus are in violation of FCRA rules and need to remove the inquiries or show me indisputable proof that approved these inquires or delete them. I HAVE ALSO RECEIVED CONFLICTING REPORTS FROM ALL  XXXX  BUREAUS,  ONE MINU TE THE INQUIRIES WERE GONE AND THEN RETURNED. I have a paper report of them being gone but online they are there, then I received another report where they are there AGAIN. When I called, I was in contact with a agents who barely speak English and I was told it was a glitche in the system and they do n't know what is reporting correctly because of the glitche but the REFUSED to remove them nor can prove they were initiated by me. Attached is a list of hard inquiries not approved by me and identity theft report. Please just remove all hard  INQUIRES, it i s prevented me from obtaining a mortgage.
I received a fraud alert from CITI on XX/XX/XXXX about a transaction in the amount of {$690.00} on XX/XX/XXXX which I did not originally recognize, so CITI cancelled my credit card and sent me a new one ( my current card ). A few days later, I learned that my granddaughter to whom I had given permission to use my card, had used it to make that {$690.00} purchase ( XXXX XXXX order no. XXXX ). So I called and informed CITI that the {$690.00} charge was legitimate. This charge correctly shows up on my XX/XX/XXXX statement as rebill cm accepts ( XXXX ) and of course I am not disputing it. 

Also, at about the same time, on XX/XX/XXXX, my granddaughter cancelled the order and got an acknowledgement from XXXX XXXX. Subsequent to this, XXXX XXXX credited 75 % of the {$690.00} charge ( amounts to {$520.00} ) instead of the full amount as the product had already shipped and their third party retailer policy was to charge a 25 % restocking fee ( amount of {$170.00} ). This is the credit of {$520.00} which shows on my XX/XX/XXXX statement. 

Subsequent to this, upon my complaining about having to pay the {$170.00} restocking fee, XXXX XXXX sent a XXXX XXXX gift card on XX/XX/XXXX to XXXX XXXX as she is the one who had placed the original XXXX XXXX order no. XXXX. 

Therefore, the {$690.00} amount was fully refunded through a credit of {$520.00} to the CITI Card and a Gift Card for {$170.00}. 

There is no purchase in the amount of {$520.00} from XXXX XXXX or any other merchant for that matter. As such, the charge of {$520.00} on my XX/XX/XXXX statement is in error and I am disputing it and asking for an immediate credit in the same amount. 

I urged CITI to contact XXXX XXXX to verify everything I have explained and to contact me if further information was needed. 

I have repeatedly called and wrote a detailed letter, attaching all relevant information but CITI has not responded and the issue stays unresolved. 

I want CITI to credit the {$520.00}.
I get phone calls everyday, they are calling relatives, friends and people I do n't have contact with anymore, they are calling my employer constantly and I am being reprimanded at work for the phone calls.
I applied for a car loan, there is now a judgement that is all of a sudden appearing on my credit report which does not belong to me the judgement was on my dad 's report clearly I was too young to have a judgement back in 2011. My dad and I have the same first and last name but not middle. I am not clear as to who would be able to place that judgement on my credit report after it 's already been placed under my dads 's name back in 2011. If so I would like to know if I can file a lawsuit for emotional distress to the person that is responsible for this.
I had a XXXX XXXX account that was opened XX/XX/XXXX. The account was closed XX/XX/XXXX. Because I never made payments on the account, I had a judgement against me. The judgement was satisfied after I made my final payment. XXXX XXXX, a representative from XXXX XXXX was over-seeing the account. After making my final payment in XX/XX/XXXX, he said that the information would be sent in the credit bureaus to update my report. I've been contacting Mr. XXXX since early this year ( XXXX ) to help with the corrections. Mr. XXXX then told me he didn't have any control of what would be updated with the bureaus. I contacted the 3 bureaus and they told me to contact XXXX XXXX. I contacted XXXX XXXX and they told me that they couldn't do anything about it. I've been experiencing the run arounds since XXXX of this year. I've contacted the Minnesota Attorney general 's office as well. I have yet to find help with this issue. The status on my credit report is not showing paid as it should be. It also shows that I still have a balance. I've written multiple letters to all 3 bureaus and nothing ever happened ( No response ). I've had the status to change on other items on my credit report accurately this year, but nothing has been done with the XXXX XXXX account.
I *love* my new car - a 2015 Chevy Spark XXXX a fantastic value and wonderful service at the dealership. However, I *don't* love my GM Financial billing statement which does not readily and easily display pertinent auto loan. Nothing is " at a glance. '' The statement does not include 1 ) the interest rate ( it shows the monthly charge and what I PAY for interest - but not the APR ) ( 2 ) No structured " payoff '' amounts ( like credit card statements do : XXXX. " If you pay {$300.00} a month, this will be paid off in x months ; If you pay {$350.00}, it will be paid off in x months. '' I think these statements are deliberately misleading to the consumers and need to be revamped to resemble the newer credit card statements where everything is " out there '' for the consumer. Thank you.
I have XXXX private loan with XXXX # XXXX accounts on my Equifax credit report that were written off and charged off and the statue of Limitation are coming up for these loans and I have requested for them to be removed however no action has been taking.
During  XXXX   XXXX ,  201  6 Wells Fargo placed an account for which i never applied for. I called and asked for it to be removed. However Wells Fargo h as only removed the inquiry from my  XXXX  report. It is still in both my   XXXX   and  XXXX  credit reports.   The inquiry : Name  : Wells Fargo Pl & L Inquir y Date :  XXXX   XXXX ,  2016  Phone: XXXX
On XX/XX/2018 I purchased a bundle deal from XXXX XXXX XXXX for {$230.00} consisting of a computer processor and computer motherboard using my Bank of America Travel Rewards credit card. XXXX XXXX   shipped part of the purchase, the motherboard, but cancelled the processor, while still charging the full amount for the transaction. 

I first attempted to contact XXXX XXXX regarding this issue, but received no reply. I then attempted to dispute the transaction with Bank of America. After initially finding in my favor, Bank of America reversed their decision after a response from the merchant and charged me the full amount. Despite finding an issue with their review process, they closed the case and rejected an appeal. They have since refused to review this case.
American Express will not allow me to redeem cash back rewards, as advertised, without me providing them with an email address that they can dump trash email marketing into. They have widely advertised their cash back reward card but have not indicated that an email address for AMEX 's use and convenience is required to redeem your earned cash back credits. Yet I just tried to redeem my cash back credit through their online website and was not allowed to do so without providing them with an email address they like better than the one I gave them ( a non-working one appropriate for the junk email dumping AMEX wishes to use it for ). 
Why is a company as deceptive, unfair and abusive in its practices as AMEX allowed to violate people 's privacy and put them at risk by demanding an email address for their own marketing purposes? Why are people being forced to pay for more of AMEX 's advertising than they want to or should be required to?
Equifax continues to report a XXXX credit card on my credit report as an authorized user. I want this to come off my report as I am not responsible and not an authorized user of this specific XXXX account. I have requested this twice over the past XXXX months and this account is still showing up under my report. 
There should only be XXXX XXXX Bank Credit Card on my credit profile and not XXXX! XXXX is mine and my obligation while the other is NOT my obligation and should be removed ASAP.
I have several accounts that are NOT mine reporting to Experian. In addition my name is not correct with Experian either. I 've sent documentation proving my identity several times over the past 5 months and Experian is not complying with my demand to remove this erroneous information from my credit profile. This mis-reporting information is causing me much grief and frustration. Clearly I am NOT XXXX XXXX as they are reporting me as. On XXXX XXXX & again on XXXX XXXX I sent letters of dispute with all Identification documentation provided. There are several delinquent student loan accounts reporting falsely in my credit profile. I have confirmed with the Dept of Ed several times and they are in agreement these accounts are not mine. These accounts were deleted from my profile with XXXX and XXXX properly already. Experian is now the last credit bureau not in compliance.
I have contacted / disputed with Equifax regarding a inquiry from  XXXX  that I did not authorize. The company refuses to investigate.   I did not authorize this inquiry.
After I make the monthly payment, interest charge for purchases and interest charge for cash advances are charged to my account. I am debited with these charges, after I make a payment on my account as if I have made additional purchases, and cash advances ( since the last payment ) from my account when I have not.