WillisBack/dataset-financial-user-claim huggingface dataset:
In XXXX 2017, I contacted XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX, Md. to inquire about getting a mortgage for my first home. After reviewing my credit score, asking about my income and my down payment amount, the loan officer said that I 'd need to work on my credit score before they 'd be able to offer me a long. The issue was my credit utilization. He told me that if I took care of that right away, my score should shoot up very quickly and I 'd be able to look for a home. 

I immediately paid all my credit cards to zero and got back in touch with the Capital One loan officer. He said that it would take a while for the credit agencies to reflect my new credit utilization, but that we 'd keep checking. It took about 30 days, but my scores had improved by about 80 points, which the loan officer told me was more than sufficient for me to buy a home. He issued me a pre-approval letter for {$420000.00} and I began looking for my home. 

I found a home on which I wanted to make an offer, which was significantly less expensive than my pre-approval amount. I was soon under contract with the purchase price of {$360000.00}. I contacted my loan officer and immediately provided him with all the documentation he needed to confirm my income and my down payment. Every piece of information I provided to him was exactly as I told him ( income was accurate, funds for down payment were accurate ). However, a few days later, the loan officer informed me that the bank would not be able to finance my mortgage. There was no clear reason for why, he just said the combination of my income, credit score, etc could n't work. The frustrating thing about this is that, if this were the case, the bank should never have told me they would give me a mortgage and issue a pre-approval letter. Nothing changed from the time they issued the letter to when I went under contract except for the fact that I was asking to borrow about $ 60k less than they approved me to borrow. 

The pre-approval letter lists qualifications they need to check for full approval as satisfactory appraisal and title report, verification of income, assets and other information, and no material changes to your credit or financial situation. I provided information to verify my income and assets, which were exactly as I stated in order to get the pre-approval in the first place.
I was a loyal Best Buy credit card holder for years. I used my in-store credit to make purchases at Best Buy, which also let me pay with no interest on certain items, very handy. Last year Best Buy, in conjunction with  Citi, enabled these Best Buy in store cards to morph into a credit card. Here lies my issue ... .no action needed on my part. So, after forgetting about the issue, my card turned into a Citi Visa able to charge wherever Visa accepted.  So of course I used it ... my interest rate is 24.99 %. I find this wrong, in that, by letting them use the no action on my part, to constitute permission, to turn my in store card to a credit card usable anywhere. Here, guy with a drinking problem, here is a bottle of  XXXX   XXXX , you do n't have to use it, but feel free to if you want to!!   This should be illegal ... ONLY with a customers consent should they have been able to do this switch, not just because of inaction on my part. I would have done nothing otherwise. My credit is good, I have no issues paying for this ... but, its wrong. Wrong on top of wrong. Doubt guys at  XXXX   XXXX  thought much of what they were doing at the time as well.
I have SEVERAL unauthorized inquiries on my credit report from Transunion. I have contacted them many, many times seeking a resolution.I have also reached out to all of the creditors. They have no evidence that I have applied for credit with them. I have placed fraud alerts on my report and still receive UNAUTHORIZED inquiries. I have an unauthorized inquiry from XXXX XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ). I also have  UNAUTHORIZED/FRAUDULENT inquires from XXXX  XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ), XXXX/XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ), and XXXX/XXXX ( XX/XX/XXXX ). I have XXXX children and these inquiries are definitely stopping me from getting a mortgage/home for my family. None of these inquiries were made by me. I have no knowledge of them. I have fraud alerts with all three bureaus and it is wrong to still have these fraudulent inquiries on MY files. I have reached out to each company several times and they all say that i need to contact Transunion because they have no record of me applying for anything.
I recently noticed that my XXXX score was impacted due to Southwest credit systems LP reporting inaccurate information on behalf of XXXX, i currently have only one account with XXXX service and do not recall owing XXXX, i will like full validation including billing statements and signed contract. Southwest credit systems has been reporting that i owe {$58.00} dollars.
The XXXX XXXX XXXX site will not allow me to login to my account. There is an error with the system either timing out while trying to log in or it has an issue with cookies. The site locks you out of your account ( even after allowing you to go through layers of verification- which have to be correct or the system does n't let you proceed ) and there are no protocols in place to unlock the password or account on the weekends. 

I am buying a home, and keep my money for appraisal/inspection/insurance in this account. I will now be unable to access the account to set up a transfer in any capacity until Tuesday, potentially causing my student loan payments to now bounce since I 'm on auto pay and and was assuming I could ... You know, access the money in my account to help cover the XXXX $ appraisal I went ahead and paid for. 

No way to access to my account or money for three days or a bank with no physical presence being closed for that long should be illegal.
I settled this debt on XX/XX/XXXX. Requested a lean release to be removed on my property. They have not completed the lean release so I can not refinance my house. I now have to pay for a second appraisal since the first one expired. They will not commit to remove the lean or give me any other information. 
Company : XXXX XXXX XXXX, XXXX XXXX my Account # XXXX
I am attaching the investigation requests I sent to the credit bureaus on XX/XX/XXXX. Almost 90 days have passed without a response. They were supposed to respond in 30.
XXXX XXXX/XXXX XXXX failed to notify me about reporting derogatory info. to XXXX, XXXX, and XXXX In section 603 ( p ) 15 U.S.C. ss 168s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( A ) ( I ) ; The notice required under subparagraph ( A ) shall be provided to the customer prior to, or no later than 30 days after XX/20157, furnishing the negative derogatory 30, 60,90,120, 150, CO information to a consumer reporting agency described in section 603 ( p ), 15 U.S.C. ss 1681s-2 ( a ) ( 7 ) ( B ) ( I ) .Plus broke commercial law under UCC 9.501 that all notices were timely and properly given bydated certified mail receipt. They were not met. I asked for documentation & received no response.
Also, XXXX XXXX/XXXX '' failed to give me my " Mini-Miranda '' five days prior to placing this derogatory item on all of my credit reports, per Section 807 ( 11 ) & FDCPA 809, which is {$1000.00} per violation and the state of CA allows treble damages. 

Under 809. Validations of date and Mini-Mirandi under Section 807 ( 1 ) XXXX XXXX/XXXX failed to send me my initial communication before placing this alleged derogatory 30, 60,90,120, 150, CO status on my credit reports further violating the FCRA, I understand that according to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, failing to provide this notice can result in a penalty up to {$2500.00} and can be enforced by the FTC, and that my state attorney general can also enforce this with a {$1000.00} penalty as well. 

I attached a copy of the law and the actual document from the federal reserve XXXX XXXX/XXXX is held liable as well for defamation and in the state of CA a creditor is who collects their on debt is considered a debt collector under FDCPA. XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. ) citing XXXX v. XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Tex.App-XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX )
Equifax was a victim of a significant cyber attack. My identity was stolen in this attack. I have set up alerts on my credit but as one of many victims of this attack, I have not sought recourse. Their free credit monitoring offer makes it so that I am unable to participate in a class action lawsuit which is unappealing and deceitful.
Miramed Revenue XXXX has opened 8 credit collections for one instance in XXXX, 2016 thus making my credit appear worse! 
This debt is incorrect and should be combined as one derogatory, not multiple.
XX/XX/XXXX, after losing a job, I applied with Bank of America for modification of my mortgage. In the next three months, I did receive XXXX letters from BofA, XXXX of them with the requests to submit the same documents I submitted originally at the time of application. Finally, BofA informed me on XXXX and XXXX that I am not eligible for modification of the loan for the following reasons:1. " You are making all required loan payments on time. " 2. " You did not obtain my loan on or before XX/XX/XXXX. '' It was absolutely clear from the very beginning that I obtain my loan long after XX/XX/XXXX. 
XXXX. " You have sufficient net income ( pension of XXXX a month ) to pay your current mortgage payments ( {$1300.00} a month ) '' 4. " Your loan is not eligible for the Home Affordable Unemployment Program because we service your loan on behalf of an investors that has not given us the contractual authority to suspend your payment under the Home Affordable Unemployment Program '' ( The most puzzling one ). 
The whole process was tortuous as nobody explained to me why should I submit the same package of documents ( bank statements, verification of my pension and unemployment status, etc ) seven times in three months. I am sure nobody read them as I was getting the same letters with different dates on them. 
I am still unemployed ( my unemployment benefits rean out long time ago ) with almost no prospects ( my age of XXXX works against me ) and I am still making payments on time borrowing money left and right. I do not believe I ever had a single late payment in my lifetime and I can not allow myself not to pay. Unfortunately, according to BofA, this is # 1 reason I was denied a loan modificationI am still having difficulties making payments as in addition to that I have medical bills, child support, plus prolonged unemployment since XX/XX/XXXX. 
The whole situation is described in several attachments. I am seeking loan modification, but Bank of America does not want to cooperate. They told me openly, that if I would stop making payments, my chances for loan modification will significantly improve. But it is against my principles. 
Thank you, XXXX XXXX. All documents from BofA were signed by XXXX XXXX, Customer Relationship Manager
I sent 3 certified letters and the company has violated and failed too : Required by federal law to place a " notice of dispute '' on my account within 30 days of my dispute, which the company signed for my letter 3 times. I have retained a copy of the signatures and date of receipt, as well as a time-stamped copy of my credit reports, showing that company has violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act, Section 623 ( a ) ( 3 ) and/or the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act Section. 


This company has violated and is in non-compliance, per FCRA 623 ( a ) ( 3 ) Responsibilities of furnishers of information to consumer reporting agencies ( 3 ) Duty to provide notice of dispute. If the completeness or accuracy of any information furnished by any person to any consumer reporting agency is disputed to such person by a consumer, the person may not furnish the information to any consumer reporting agency without notice that such information is disputed by the consumer. 
( B ) Time of Notice ( B.I ) The notice required under subparagraph ( A ) shall be provided to the customer prior to, or no later than 30 days after, furnishing the negative information to a consumer reporting agency described in section 603 ( p ). 

This company violated federal law, by not properly providing the credit bureaus with proper notice within the required timeframe, and I have evidence of such, via certified mail receipts, and the company must now remove the item. 

Any other action ( or in-action ) on your behalf will result in a small claims action against your company. I will be seeking a minimum of {$1000.00} in damages per violation for : 1. ) Defamation 2. ) Negligent Enablement of Identity Fraud 3. ) Violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act ( including but not limited to Section 807- 4. ) Violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( including but not limited to Section 623-b )
I was a victim of Transunion inquiries issue and their customer support does not want to help their customers to remove all those fraudulent inquiries from the report. 

XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX  Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX  Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX  Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX/XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX   Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX  XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XXXX  XXXX Inquiry from XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX
I was issued but did not activate a Citi Master Card. They continue to send me letters that say that I owe monies for "   XXXX   '' for an inactive card. I have tried calling the toll free number on the back of the card and I am told the card is not active. I continue to get postal mail telling me that I have to logon to a website or I will be charged for the "   XXXX   '' service for the inactive card. I am unable to talk with Citi directly because they hang up on the automation answering service or they do not acknowledge my request to speak to a person because the card number I enter is not active. Account ending  XXXX  and Customer reference   XXXX   Please help with the demands they place upon me for the inactive card.
There needs to be a way for a person to talk with a responsible Citi employee.
Thanks,   XXXX   XXXX
AR RESOURSES. XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Florida XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX XXXX/XXXX/XXXX XXXX  XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Florida At times of Incidents I had moved into a XXXX XXXX Shelter in XXXX Florida and was using State Provided Insurance at XXXX State Granted Issuance. Contact Department of Health Human resources for I.D . numbers or XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Florida XXXX Was informed that the bills incurred from E.R physical inspection report and other accumulated Dr . Visits would be handled by State/County Insurance. Please send me any paperwork for crisis payment or Homelessness verification as I stayed at XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Please understand that I have been provided with XXXX Payment at XXXX per month and receive benefits on 1 of month each Month. I  'm Sorry for any misunderstandings on my behalf as it was mandatory visits I made as a resident of both XXXX and XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX after leaving XXXX. 
MY EMAIL IS XXXXXXXXXXXX
I had my XXXX student loans through XXXX XXXX, which turned over to Navient. I took out roughly {$35000.00} back in the mid XXXX for school tuition. When I graduated, I was not able to start payments, so the only option I was given was forbearance ( i.e., interest continued to accrue during this time that I put my payments on hold ). I also was told that I could only consolidate for a lower interest rate one time, which I had already done, so my interest rate has always remained the same, even with offers to others for lower rates. I have paid consistently on this loan since XX/XX/XXXX, have paid back my original {$35000.00}, and I still have {$38000.00} to pay due to the interest. No one has been able to help me with this. I read an article about the class action law suit towards Navient/XXXX and was wondering if I qualified for the complaint.
Dear CFPB, I have been trying to dispute a debt that is not mine with XXXX, XXXX ( XXXX XXXX RENTAL ) for the past 3 years. This entity has been using deceptive debt collection practices to collect on a debt that they have not proven to belong to I, XXXX XXXX XXXX. At the same time, the CRA 's have not honored my request to remove tradeline off my reports and the furnisher of the information to verify the debt. I had to file a complaint with my local XXXX and XXXX XXXX did not respond. I made a debt collection complaint to the CFPB and the company is not registered, so they can not respond. This is a last ditch effort for the CRA 's to comply with the FCRA.
I spoke to a man at Tek Collect inc. that said " May I speak to XXXX ''. I did not identify who I was, I asked him who was calling.. He said XXXX were calling to collect on a debt. I told him that I had not identified myself. He yelled did you pay the bill or not. Then he hung up in my face. He was rude and condescending.
On XXXX XXXX, 2015, I took advantage of a promotion in the Macy 's men 's department at their XXXX, OR store where I would receive a XXXX % discount if I opened a revolving charge account. So I did, and promptly paid the full amount of the charge right there at the checkout stand. Several months later, I receive a statement that I owed more than {$500.00}. Upon investigating, I discovered that the account was charged XXXX for the same purchase. Once at the discounted price of {$390.00} that I paid on the spot, but then the charge at the full price of {$480.00} was also added for the same transaction. I never received a statement until several months later to discover the account had been referred to collections and more than {$100.00} in late fees and interest were also added. After trying for several weeks, and speaking to dozens of customer service representatives, I am compelled to file a formal complaint against Macy 's and their predatory credit practices. They lure customers to open usurious revolving charge accounts with discounts at the time of purchase only to rip-off consumers with false charges to their accounts and then charge outrageous late fees and penalties, referrals to collection agencies, and incur deleterious impacts to their credit scores without providing consumer-friendly, effective means to redress the problems.
Last XX/XX/2018, I sent this credit repository a letter via fax requesting the XXXX XXXX   account ref # XXXX to be removed and blocked from my credit report pursuant to FCRA 605B. Pursuant to FCRA 605B a reported fraudulent account MUST be removed from a consumer 's credit report within 4 business days. Attached to this complaint is a copy of my Police Report and FTC ID theft report and copy of the letter faxed to this credit bureau.
when I took look at my credit report I notice some Hard Inquiry that I know I did not give permission to run. I look at all of the majors credit agency each one is showing something different. with these hard inquiry cause my credit score to drop. I would like these hard inquiry to be correct and remove. from all three credit agency. 

This is list of all the Hard inquiry. 
1. XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX DATE : XXXX XXXX, XXXX 2. XXXX XXXX -- -- -- DATE XXXX XXXX 3.XXXX XXXX XXXX -- -- -- - DATE .... XXXX XXXX 4.XXXX XXXX XXXX -- XXXX DATE XXXX XXXX, XXXX 5.PXXXX XXXX XXXX DATE XXXX XXXX XXXX.
I have limited exact dates of transactions as the company XXXX XXXX XXXX closed in XXXX of XXXX. I purchased several packages from XXXX XXXX XXXX for XXXX XXXX XXXX between XXXX and XXXX. Over those 4 years I paid XXXX XXXX XXXX approximately {$6000.00}. In XXXX when my services ended without being complete I stopped paying XXXX XXXX XXXX as they closed. When I stopped paying I was sent letters from Comenity Bank asking me to pay my balance. I explained to them several times that I do not owe the debt as my treatments are incomplete and in fact I felt as XXXX XXXX XXXX  owed me money. I paid thousands of dollars and still have incomplete treatments. XXXX XXXX XXXX agrees to continue treatments until all hair is gone. They discuss that it can take years of treatments. I did as Comenity asked me to do regarding disputing the charges. I sent them letters expressing that I dispute all charges. I told them I could not get exact transaction dates as XXXX XXXX XXXX is closed. They did not accept my dispute and have continued to harass me. I am now being sued by them. Comenity is claiming I owe them {$2800.00} however with interest and fees they are now suing me for {$4200.00}. They have hurt my credit and I am so stressed. I do n't understand how a bank can harass and force people to pay for services they did not receive. I obviously did not get the services as the place closed. As I have told them I would pay if I received the money or the service but I did not. How can we as consumers trust the stores we purchase things from if this is allowed? If I want to apply at a store for credit for floors I will not ever want to do that. What if they close before I get my floors and I have to pay for them anyway? I think this is a scary precedent to set, that banks can collect money despite no serve or product being rendered. The definition of purchase is to by a product or service. I purchased nothing. I should owe nothing. I am also assuming that Comenity Bank received large payments from XXXX XXXX XXXX when they filed chap XXXX or XXXX. XXXX XXXX has my services and my money not me. Comenity is harassing the little person in this and I am beyond angry. I have also complained to Better Business Bureau and the Attorney General 's office.
A CREDIT INQUIRY FOR XXXX XXXX XXXX WAS PLACED ON MY TRANSUNION REPORT ON XX/XX/2018. I IDID N'T AUTHORIZE THIS INQUIRY FOR A CAR. 

FRAUDULENT INQUIRY WAS MADE TO XXXX XXXX XXXX BY AUTO DEALER. 

XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX CT XXXX XXXX
I have multiple balance transfers on my CitiBank Mastercard with different promotional interest rates and end dates for those promotional rates. I also have a small standard purchase amount ( annual fee billed directly to the card by the card company. ) I have been paying extra above my minimum payment each month. When I took a look at how the extra payment has been applied, it appears to me that it is NOT being applied according to the regulations of the CARD act. My understanding, based on the materials on this site as well as supplemental reading elsewhere, is that when you have multiple balances with different interest rates, the credit card must apply payments first to outstanding interest, then to the balance with the highest interest. If multiple balances are at the same interest rate, then they should apply the payment first to the balance with the promotional rate that ends first. 
It appears based on my statements that instead they are applying payments first to outstanding interest, then to the nearest promotional balance, with a tiny amount going towards the standard purchase amount. My calculations show that my standard purchase amount, which is at 16.49 % interest rate versus 1.99 % or less on the other balances, should be approximately half the balance it currently is if the payment was applied as I understand it should be. This was not an issue until the card was charged for the annual fee and thus had a standard purchase balance. 
I did attempt to contact Citibank, but was put on hold for an extended time and gave up. I read their website but was unable to find a description of how they apply payments in this situation. 
Therefore, I am filing this complaint. I have attached all statements, which show both payments made and the breakdown of balances and interest rates, going back to XX/XX/2017the month prior to when the annual fee was charged to the card.